Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Monterey City Council
June 3, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
June 3, 2025
Body
Monterey City Council
Original file
76.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on isearchmonterey.org. That file is the official record.

FILING OF ANNUAL RATE REPORT FOR PROPOSED COLLECTION OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON THE FY2025-26 TAX ROLL
AND

PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE MONTEREY CITY COUNCIL
Notice is hereby given that the City of Monterey Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2025-26 Tax Roll has been filed with the City Clerk. This report describes each parcel of real property that receives sewer services from the City of Monterey and the amount of sewer service charges to be imposed on each parcel for Fiscal Year 2025-2026. The written report is available at the following locations for review:
 Online at https://monterey.gov/sewer available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week  Monterey Public Library, 625 Pacific St., Monterey, during library hours  Monterey Engineering Division, 580 Pacific St., Room 7, Monterey, during business hours
Notice is hereby further given that the City of Monterey City Council will hold a public hearing to consider approving the City of Monterey Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2025-26 Tax Roll and directing collection of its sewer rate charges on the Monterey County tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes.

DATE: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard.

PLACE: Council Chamber, Few Memorial Hall of Records, 580 Pacific St., Monterey, CA 93940
SUBJECT: Receive Protests Related to the Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the Property Tax Roll for Fiscal Year 2025-26, Approve the Annual Rate Report of Sewer Charges for FY 2025-26, and Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the Collection of FY 2025-26 Sewer Charges on the Tax Roll if a Majority Protest Does Not Exist PROPOSED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: At the public hearing, the City Council will hear and consider all evidence, testimony, objections, or protests, if any, to the Annual Rate Report by all interested persons. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may: (1) adopt, revise, change, reduce or modify any change or overrule any or all objections and make its determination upon each charge as described in the Annual Report, which decision shall be final; (2) adopt the Annual Rate Report as presented or modified by the Council; and (3) direct the City Clerk to file a copy of the Annual Rate Report as presented or modified with the AuditorController of the County of Monterey for the purpose of placing the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 sewer service charges and any delinquencies on the tax roll. If the City Council finds that protest is made by the owners of a majority of separate parcels of property described in the Annual Report, then the Annual Report shall not be adopted and the charges shall be collected separately from the tax roll.

DETAILED INFORMATION: The Annual Rate Report for Proposed Collection of Sewer Service Charges on the FY2025-26 Tax Roll is filed and available online 24/7 at Monterey.gov/sewer and at the Monterey Public Library (625 Pacific St.) during library hours and the Engineering Division (580 Pacific St., Room 7) during business hours. The meeting agenda will be posted at

ATTACHMENT
2 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 169, Packet Page 199 least 72 hours before the meeting outside the Council Chamber at 580 Pacific St., Monterey, CA 93940 and on https://isearchmonterey.org/
HOW TO PROTEST: Any owner of a parcel included in the report may submit a written protest; however, only one protest will be counted per identified parcel. Any written protest must:

1. State that the property owner protests the annual sewer rate report;

2. Provide the location of the identified parcel (by street address or assessor’s parcel number);

3. Include the full name and signature of the property owner submitting the protest; and

4. Be received by the City before the end of the public hearing on June 3, 2025.

Written protests from property owners must be received by the City Clerk before the closing of the City Council public hearing on June 3, 2025. Property owners may submit protests by:
 Personal delivery to the secure drop box across from the accessible entrance to the Council Chamber, City Hall, 580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940, in an envelope clearly marked “Attention: Sewer Rate Report Protest,” or  Mail to the City Clerk, 580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940, in an envelope clearly marked “Attention: Sewer Rate Report Protest,” or
 Hand delivery to the City Clerk at the meeting prior to the conclusion of the public hearing on June 3, 2025.

Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a written protest as provided above.

HOW TO PROVIDE INPUT ON THE MATTER (NON-PROTEST): Any interested person or an authorized agent may appear at the hearing and be heard. Comment may be made in writing or by addressing the Council during the meeting. Written comments will not qualify as formal protests unless they meet the specifications outlined above. Oral comments at the public hearing will not qualify as formal protests unless accompanied by a written protest as specified above. Please email [email protected] to submit non-protest written comments or be added to the agenda notification email list.

QUESTIONS? Contact:

City of Monterey Public Works Department, Engineering Division 580 Pacific Street, Room 7, Monterey, CA 93940
[email protected] (831) 646-3921
ACCESS: For disabled access to the City, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanishlanguage services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. /s/ Clementine Bonner Klein, City Clerk
Published on May 17, 2025 and May 24, 2025, pursuant to California Health and Safety Code § 5473.1 and Government Code § 6066.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 170, Packet Page 200 RESOLUTION NO. 24-096 C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
SETTING RATES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2024 FOR WASTEWATER (SEWER) RATES WHEREAS, Monterey City Code (MCC) Section 19-103 lists services provided by the City and the percentage of the cost of the services that are to be recovered and adopted as a fee;
WHEREAS, for Fiscal year 2021-22, the Sewer Line Maintenance Fund (279) had $2,431,727.00 in expenditures and $2,048,989.00 in revenue, which was a $382,738.00 shortfall;
WHEREAS, final numbers for fiscal years 2022-23 and 2023-24 are not yet available, but, as of February 2024, the projected shortfall is estimated over $400,000.00 per year; WHEREAS, Proposition 218 requires that fees cannot exceed the cost of service, must be fair and equitable, and are based on the actual cost of providing the entire service. Each customer must be charged their proportional cost of service attributable to the customer; WHEREAS, the California Constitution requires (1) notice; (2) a public hearing; and (3) a protest process before increasing the rate of a property-related fee; WHEREAS, the City desires to adjust the wastewater rates it charges to recover the cost of service, maintenance and future improvements of the City wastewater collection system; WHEREAS, Bartle Wells Associates conducted a 2024 Wastewater Rate and Capacity Fee Study to develop proposed rates to recover costs and the proposed rates are based on that fee study;
WHEREAS, revenue derived from the fee will not be used for any purpose other than that for which the fee is imposed;
WHEREAS, the rates imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident of property ownership must not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel; WHEREAS, the wastewater (sewer) rates are not imposed unless used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property subject to the fee or charge; WHEREAS, pursuant to Proposition 218, a notice of the proposed rate increase was mailed on April 19, 2024 to all affected parcels;
WHEREAS, on June 4, 2024, the City held a public hearing to consider all protests against the proposed rate increase;
WHEREAS, the total number of written protests presented by the close of the public hearing was less than 50% plus one of the total number of property owners subject to the rate and fee increases; and




 






ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 171, Packet Page 201 2 WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby adopts the attached Wastewater Collection System Rate Schedule in Exhibit A hereto and that said rates shall become effective on July 1, 2024, and that all previous conflicting resolutions are hereby rescinded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 4th day of June, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Haffa, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof




 






ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 172, Packet Page 202

EXHIBIT A
CITY OF MONTEREY – WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM

RATE SCHEDULE
1 Single-Family Residential Sewer Charge
The proposed single-family dwelling (SFD) sewer charges are based on the estimated sewage generated by an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) which is 189 gallons per day (gpd). The following table outlines the monthly single-family residential sewer charge:

MONTHLY SFD SEWER CHARGE
Current 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
Residential $10.77 $14.11 $16.93 $19.47 $21.42 $22.92
Monthly Increase $3.34 $2.82 $2.54 $1.95 $1.50
Multi-Family Residential and Condominium Sewer Charge
The proposed multi-family dwelling (MFD) sewer charges, including condominium units, are based on sewerage generated, which has been calculated to be 73.22% of 189 gpd. The following table outlines the monthly multi-residential and condominium sewer charge, per dwelling unit:

PROPOSED MONTHLY MFD SEWER CHARGE
Current 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
Residential $7.88 $10.32 $12.38 $14.24 $15.66 $16.76
Monthly Increase $2.44 $2.06 $1.86 $1.42 $1.10
Non-Residential Sewer Charge
The proposed non-residential sewer charges will vary based on sewage generated by customer type.

Non-residential sewer charges will be converted to an equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) cost using sewage flow estimates. One residential EDU is equivalent to 189 gallons per day (gpd) of flow. The monthly non-residential sewer charges will be calculated based on the following formula:
- Daily flow / 189 gpd = Total Number of EDUs (to 2 decimal places) - Total Number of EDUs x Monthly EDU Rate = Monthly Non-Residential Sewer charge The proposed non-residential sewer charges listed below are per one unit of sewer charge. For special user or categories not listed, call the City for an individual determination. 



 






ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 173, Packet Page 203

EXHIBIT A
CITY OF MONTEREY – WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM

RATE SCHEDULE
2 NOTIFICATION OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
Pursuant to Government Code section 53759, there is a 120-day statute of limitations for challenging any increased fee or charge.

DESCRIPTION UNITS Current 7/1/2024 7/1/2025 7/1/2026 7/1/2027 7/1/2028 Business/Government (1-10 employees) Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Business/Government (11-20 employees) Location/Each Business $16.59 $21.73 $26.08 $29.99 $32.99 $35.30 Business/Government (21-30 employees) Location/Each Business $24.99 $32.74 $39.29 $45.18 $49.70 $53.18 Business/Government (31-40 employees) Location/Each Business $33.28 $43.60 $52.32 $60.17 $66.19 $70.82 Business/Government (41-50 employees) Location/Each Business $41.57 $54.46 $65.35 $75.15 $82.67 $88.46 Business/Government (51-60 employees) Location/Each Business $49.87 $65.33 $78.40 $90.16 $99.18 $106.12 Business/Government (61-70 employees) Location/Each Business $58.27 $76.33 $91.60 $105.34 $115.87 $123.98 Business/Government (71-80 employees) Location/Each Business $66.56 $87.19 $104.63 $120.32 $132.35 $141.61 Business/Government (81-90 employees) Location/Each Business $74.85 $98.05 $117.66 $135.31 $148.84 $159.26 Business/Government (91-100 employees) Location/Each Business $83.14 $108.91 $130.69 $150.29 $165.32 $176.89 Business/Government (101-110 employees) Location/Each Business $91.55 $119.93 $143.92 $165.51 $182.06 $194.80 Business/Government (111-120 employees) Location/Each Business $99.84 $130.79 $156.95 $180.49 $198.54 $212.44 Business/Government (141-150 employees) Location/Each Business $124.82 $163.51 $196.21 $225.64 $248.20 $265.57 Business/Government (171-180 employees) Location/Each Business $149.70 $196.11 $235.33 $270.63 $297.69 $318.53 Business/Government (181-190 employees) Location/Each Business $158.10 $207.11 $248.53 $285.81 $314.39 $336.40 Business/Government (210-220 employees) Location/Each Business $182.98 $239.70 $287.64 $330.79 $363.87 $389.34 Business/Government (271-280 employees) Location/Each Business $232.52 $304.60 $365.52 $420.35 $462.39 $494.76 Business/Government (721-730 employees) Location/Each Business $607.32 $795.59 $954.71 $1,097.92 $1,207.71 $1,292.25 Hotel/Motel Each Room $4.63 $6.07 $7.28 $8.37 $9.21 $9.85 Supermarket Each Location $45.45 $59.54 $71.45 $82.17 $90.39 $96.72 Medical Office Each Licensed Physician $11.09 $14.53 $17.44 $20.06 $22.07 $23.61 Dental Office Each Licensed Dentist $15.29 $20.03 $24.04 $27.65 $30.42 $32.55 Rest Home/Convalescent Each Bed of Licensed Capacity $3.12 $4.09 $4.91 $5.65 $6.22 $6.66 Animal Hospital Location/Each Licensed Business $20.79 $27.23 $32.68 $37.58 $41.34 $44.23 Restaurant - 1 Meal/day Each Restaurant Seat $0.43 $0.56 $0.67 $0.77 $0.85 $0.91 Restaurant - 2 Meals/day Each Restaurant Seat $0.65 $0.85 $1.02 $1.17 $1.29 $1.38 Restaurant - 3 Meals/day Each Restaurant Seat $1.18 $1.55 $1.86 $2.14 $2.35 $2.51 Restaurant with Bar Each Restaurant Seat $1.18 $1.55 $1.86 $2.14 $2.35 $2.51 Bar Location/Each Business $18.09 $23.70 $28.44 $32.71 $35.98 $38.50 Night Club Location/Each Business $54.17 $70.96 $85.15 $97.92 $107.71 $115.25 Take-Out Small Location/Each Business $20.14 $26.38 $31.66 $36.41 $40.05 $42.85 Take-Out Medium Location/Each Business $49.65 $65.04 $78.05 $89.76 $98.74 $105.65 Take-Out Large Location/Each Business $90.47 $118.52 $142.22 $163.55 $179.91 $192.50 Bakery Location/Each Business $16.37 $21.44 $25.73 $29.59 $32.55 $34.83 Theatre Per screen @ each Location $26.82 $35.13 $42.16 $48.48 $53.33 $57.06 Gym - 500 Members Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Mortuary Location/Each Business $22.08 $28.92 $34.70 $39.91 $43.90 $46.97 School - Minimum Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 School - Pre-Grade 6 School Population $0.11 $0.14 $0.17 $0.20 $0.22 $0.24 School - Grade 7 - College School Population $0.22 $0.29 $0.35 $0.40 $0.44 $0.47 School - Boarding School Population $2.26 $2.96 $3.55 $4.08 $4.49 $4.80 Instructional Facility School Population $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Church - 1-100 Members Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Church - Over 100 Members Location/Each Business $16.59 $21.73 $26.08 $29.99 $32.99 $35.30 Photo Developer Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Laboratory - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Laboratory - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $16.59 $21.73 $26.08 $29.99 $32.99 $35.30 Printer - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Printer - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $16.59 $21.73 $26.08 $29.99 $32.99 $35.30 Garage/Repair Location/Each Business $7.97 $10.44 $12.53 $14.41 $15.85 $16.96 Paint Shop - 10 Employees Location/Each Business $8.29 $10.86 $13.03 $14.98 $16.48 $17.63 Paint Shop - 20 Employees Location/Each Business $16.59 $21.73 $26.08 $29.99 $32.99 $35.30 Dry Cleaner Location/Each Business $27.57 $36.12 $43.34 $49.84 $54.82 $58.66 Laundromat Each Washing Machine $7.22 $9.46 $11.35 $13.05 $14.36 $15.37

PROPOSED MONTHLY SEWER CHARGES




 






ATTACHMENT 3
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 174, Packet Page 204 №10/24
Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Mark Ackermann, Management Analyst
SUBJECT: Approve Installation of Rainbow Crosswalk(s) to Express the City’s Support of the LGBTQ+ Community and Update the Crosswalk Policy (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) – continued from May 23, 2025
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving the installation of rainbow crosswalk(s) as the City’s message of support of the LGBTQ+ community
and updating the Crosswalk to clarify the process for
decorative crosswalk design selection.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Foster a local government that is transparent and
collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates
input from all.

Preserve, promote, and maintain our City’s historic and cultural resources through responsible stewardship and
historic preservation that highlights the contributions and perspectives of all people who are a part of Monterey’s diverse history.

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation,
accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

A decorative crosswalk design needs to be consistent with the City’s Crosswalk Policy.

The crosswalk policy helps advance the City’s Vision Zero goal of reducing fatalities and severe injuries on City streets to zero, adopted by City Council on November 7, 2017 (Reso 17-191 C.S.). Furthermore, establishing a
uniform process for crosswalk markings is aligned with the California Vehicle Code Section 21400, which prescribes uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices.

Agenda Report Highlights
 City Council is considering
installing rainbow crosswalks to
express support for the LGBTQ+
community and promote
inclusivity.
 Decorative crosswalks must
comply with safety standards and
align with the City’s Crosswalk
Policy and Vision Zero goals.
 Installation costs range from
$2,000 to $15,000 per crosswalk,
with funding coming from the
General Fund unassigned
balance.
 Three proposed locations include
Lighthouse and Reeside Avenues,
Alvarado and Pearl Streets, and
Pacific and Madison Streets, each
with symbolic significance.
 Temporary installations can be
completed in June for Pride
Month, while permanent
installations require contracting
and additional maintenance
funding.

Date: 6/3/2025
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 205 №10/24
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The costs associated with installation of a decorative crosswalk may range widely depending on the treatment. Typical paint may not be used for crosswalks as it won’t hold up to traffic. Traffic paint, thermoplastic or Methal methacrylate are the appropriate treatments for high traffic locations.

Consideration is also given to traction for pedestrians. Costs can range between $2,000 and $15,000 per crosswalk depending on the size and complexity of the design, and if work can be performed in-house or if it must be contracted . Additionally, decorative crosswalks may require enhanced maintenance compared to a conventional crosswalk, their use and appropriate locations should be carefully considered.

There are currently no funds appropriated for the installation and maintenance of a decorative crosswalk, and if the City Council directs staff to install a decorative crosswalk all costs will come from the General Fund unassigned balance.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to approve any of the proposed locations or not to install a decorative crosswalk. The Council could recommend a different location or request that staff provide additional locations to consider. Delaying a decision or requesting additional information from staff will extend the project timeline past a June installation date that coincides with Pride Month.

The crosswalk policy contains an update to reflect that decorative crosswalks are the City’s speech and clarifies that the City Council determines whether to consider proposals and gives final approval of the placement of decorative crosswalks.

DISCUSSION:

Background
Rainbow crosswalks have been a symbol of inclusivity and support of the LGBTQ+ community in cities across California since the first was established in West Hollywood in 2012. The City of Monterey is home to a diverse group of residents and visitors alike and is proud to support the LGBTQ+ community and all groups of people who have been impacted by hatred and bigotry.

The establishment of a rainbow crosswalk at a prominent location in the City signifies this support and furthers the City’s commitment to public art. In the spirit of Pride Month, the City Council may consider the approval of one or more locations for a rainbow crosswalk in Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 206 №10/24
Monterey.

Creative or decorative crosswalks are a relatively new trend. Many other agencies across the county have begun implementing various types of new creative crosswalks. Creative crosswalks are a means to promote vibrant place-making, which can improve active pedestrian lifestyles in downtown districts or culturally significant neighborhoods.

At a special meeting on May 23, 2025, the City Council considered authorizing rainbow crosswalks and received public comment. This item was continued to June 3, 2025, to obtain feedback from business associations and to have a full composition of the City Council present for the decision.

Safety
It is important to note that crosswalks are a regulatory traffic control device intended to promote safety. The Federal Highway Administration originally issued an Official Ruling in 2011 that crosswalk art, defined as any freeform design to draw attention to the crosswalk, would degrade the contrast of the white transverse lines against the composition of the pavement beneath it.

In 2013 the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) refined its findings to clarify in the FHWA Interpretation Letter 3(09)-24(I) that: “The FHWA's position has always been, and continues to be that subdued-colored aesthetic treatments between the legally marked transverse crosswalk lines are permissible provided that they are devoid of retroreflective properties and that they do not diminish the effectiveness of the legally required white transverse pavement markings used to establish the crosswalk.”
City Crosswalk Policy
On May 20, 2025, the City adopted design guidelines to address where and under what conditions creative crosswalk treatments should be considered. The recommended amendment to the policy is to clarify the role of the City Traffic Engineer in design approval to ensure that the crosswalk markings are consistent with State and Federal Standards.

The update to the policy specifies that the City Council may invite a request for proposals from the public, on terms and conditions determined by the City Council, for decorative crosswalks at specific locations. This process is like the City’s utility box art program adopted in Resolution 19- 051 and its banner signs program set forth in City Code section 31-3(F). These programs, like the proposed update to the crosswalk policy, ensure the City’s ability to use City property for the expression of its own messages and make clear that the City does not use its utility boxes, banners signs, or crosswalks to sponsor the expression of third parties. The City’s intent is that the placement of decorative crosswalks reflects the City’s own message, and the painting of crosswalks authorized by the City shall not function as the designation of a traditional public forum.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 207 №10/24
Locations
The following is a list of three (3) location options based on their visibility and connection to the LGBTQ+ community.

Option 1: Lighthouse and Reeside Avenues
This intersection is recommended for its proximity to the former site of popular gay bar After Dark, currently Pearl Hour, located at 214 Lighthouse Avenue. This location is also near the former Lighthouse Bar and Grill at 281 Lighthouse Avenue where in 1997 a man was savagely beaten for responding affirmatively when asked if he was queer. The two perpetrators were arrested by the Monterey Police Department and charged by the Monterey County District Attorney’s Office for hate crimes. A rainbow crosswalk at this location would further emphasize the City’s support of inclusion and acceptance, as well as serve the memory of well-known location where members of the LGBTQ+ community felt safe to enjoy.

Option 2: Alvarado and Pearl Streets
This intersection marks the entryway to the City’s beloved Alvarado Street where Monterey Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 208 №10/24
Peninsula Pride hosts its annual parade in celebration of Pride Month. This location would provide the opportunity to bring additional public art and vibrancy to the City’s downtown corridor. Establishing the rainbow crosswalk across Alvarado Street creates a symbolic “starting line” to the rest of the downtown. The City Council could choose to decorate the two (2) additional crosswalks on Pearl Street to encompass the entire intersection. However, decorating additional crosswalks would increase the cost.

Option 3: Pacific and Madison Streets
The intersection at Pacific and Madison Streets lies at the heart of the local government between City Hall, Monterey Police Department, Fire Station 11, and the Monterey Public Library, and it is in view of the City’s annual Pride flag raising held in June. Like the Alvarado and Pearl Streets location, City Council could choose to paint just the crosswalk between the Library and the Police Department (across Pacific Street) or all four (4) crosswalks in the intersection. It should be noted that choosing to paint all four (4) crosswalks will significantly increase cost.

Next Steps
If approved on June 3, 2025, City crews will be able to install the crosswalk during the month of June, using temporary oil-based paint. The crosswalk markings will fade overtime and when scheduled to be refreshed the crosswalk could be converted back to the high-contrast standard white color. If Council desires a permanent rainbow crosswalk installation the markings could be installed with pre- formed thermoplastic. The permanent installation would need to be contracted out and would take a few months to implement. Increased maintenance funding would need to be identified for permanent installation.

Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution
AR/ma
cc: Monterey Peninsula Pride, [email protected]
All Business Associations
All Neighborhood Associations
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 209 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
APPROVING INSTALLATION OF RAINBOW CROSSWALK(S) TO EXPRESS THE CITY’S SUPPORT OF THE LGBTQ+ COMMUNITY AND UPDATING THE CROSSWALK POLICY WHEREAS, the City of Monterey adopted Resolution No. 23-066 to authorize the observation of Pride Month by displaying the Intersex-Inclusive Progressive Flag to honor the history of the LGBTQ+ liberation movement and to support the rights of all citizens to experience equality and freedom from discrimination. The Intersex-Inclusive Progressive Pride Flag is recognized as a symbol of pride, inclusion, and support for social movements that advocate for the LGBTQ+ people in society;
WHEREAS, in May 2025, the City passed Resolution No. 25-052 which adopted a crosswalk policy that allows decorative crosswalks;
WHEREAS, rainbow crosswalks have been a symbol of inclusivity and support for the LGBTQ+ community in cities across California since the first was established in West Hollywood in 2012. The City of Monterey is home to a diverse group of residents and visitors alike and is proud to support the LGBTQ+ community and all groups of people who have been impacted by hatred and bigotry. The establishment of a rainbow crosswalk at a prominent location or locations in the City signifies this support and furthers the City’s commitment to public art;
WHEREAS, with the adoption of this Resolution, the City authorizes rainbow crosswalks to be painted on City-owned streets to reflect the City’s message of support of the LGBTQ+ community;
WHEREAS, the amended Crosswalk Policy will provide a transparent and consistent process for the implementation of decorative crosswalks in the City of Monterey; WHEREAS, the crosswalk policy is consistent with the City’s adopted Vision Zero goal of reducing fatalities and serious injuries to zero and the City’s adopted multimodal plan, Move Monterey;
WHEREAS, that the City hereby declares that it does not use decorative crosswalks to sponsor the expression of third parties. The City declares its intent that the placement of decorative crosswalks is its own message, and the painting of any such decorative crosswalks authorized by the City shall not function as the designation of a traditional public forum; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Article 5, Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 6, Packet Page 210 any effect on the environment, this is not a project because it does not cause a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not subject to CEQA. Subsequent projects resulting from this funding will be reviewed for their CEQA status; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the City amends its crosswalk policy, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to update the process for decorative crosswalk selection and placement by the City Council; NOW THEREORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City hereby declares that it does not use its crosswalks to sponsor the expression of third parties. The City declares its intent that the placement of rainbow crosswalks or other decorative crosswalk are its own message, and the painting of such rainbow crosswalks or other decorative crosswalks as authorized by the City shall not function as the designation of a traditional public forum.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City hereby authorizes rainbow crosswalks to be implemented by the City in locations and in manner that is consistent with the City’s crosswalk policy. Specifically, rainbow crosswalks may be installed at the following locations:
.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 7, Packet Page 211 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, California
May 2025
Prepared for:

City of Monterey
Prepared by:

Kimley-Horn
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 8, Packet Page 212 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
2 Table of Contents
List of Figures .................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Crosswalk Fundamentals .................................................................................................................. 5 Types of Crosswalks ...................................................................................................................... 5 Location: Intersection or Midblock .............................................................................................. 5 Control: Controlled or Uncontrolled............................................................................................ 6 Marking: Marked or Unmarked .................................................................................................... 7 Pedestrian Crossing Laws .............................................................................................................. 8 Intersection Crosswalks and Rights-of-Way ................................................................................ 8 Midblock Crosswalks and Rights-of-Way .................................................................................... 9 Existing Crosswalks .......................................................................................................................... 12 Existing Uncontrolled, Marked Crosswalk Preliminary Inventory ..................................................... 12 Existing Pedestrian Plans and Policies ............................................................................................... 14 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update ............................................................................................. 14 Circulation Element .................................................................................................................. 14 Move Monterey - Multimodal Plan for the City of Monterey .............................................................. 16 City Council Vision, Mission, Value Drivers, and Strategic Priorities ................................................ 16 ADA Transition Plan ...................................................................................................................... 17 Evaluating Existing Crosswalks ......................................................................................................... 18 When to Evaluate ......................................................................................................................... 18 Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 18 Decision Outcomes ...................................................................................................................... 20 Meets Standard ........................................................................................................................ 20 Needs Improvement ................................................................................................................. 20 Consider for Removal ................................................................................................................ 22 New, Proposed Crosswalks .............................................................................................................. 25 Evaluating New, Proposed Crosswalks .......................................................................................... 25 When to Evaluate ......................................................................................................................... 25 Evaluation Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 25 Decision Outcomes ...................................................................................................................... 25 Meets Standard ........................................................................................................................ 26 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 9, Packet Page 213 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
3 Needs Improvement ................................................................................................................. 26 Do Not Implement .................................................................................................................... 26 Special Scenarios ............................................................................................................................ 26 Trail crossings .............................................................................................................................. 27 Bicycle crossings .......................................................................................................................... 27 Decorative crosswalks .................................................................................................................. 28 Decorative Crosswalk Guidelines ..................................................................................................... 28 Design Parameters ....................................................................................................................... 29 CA MUTCD ............................................................................................................................... 29 FHWA Interpretation Letter 3(09)-24(I) ....................................................................................... 29 Cost/Maintenance ........................................................................................................................ 30 Implementation Guidelines ........................................................................................................... 30 Appendix ......................................................................................................................................... 31 Applicable Codes and Guidelines .................................................................................................. 31 California Vehicle Code (CVC) ................................................................................................... 31 Assembly Bill No. 413................................................................................................................ 34 Monterey City Code .................................................................................................................. 36 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) ............................................. 36 Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way ................................ 43 Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) ............................................................ 46 Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 10, Packet Page 214 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
4 List of Figures
Figure 1: Location of Crosswalks ........................................................................................................ 6 Figure 2: Crosswalks at Controlled Approaches .................................................................................. 6 Figure 3: Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Approaches .............................................................................. 7 Figure 4: Marked or Unmarked Crosswalks ......................................................................................... 7 Figure 5: Intersection Crosswalks and Rights of Way ........................................................................... 9 Figure 6: Marked Midblock Crossing Right of Way .............................................................................. 10 Figure 7: Allowable and Unallowable Unmarked Midblock Crosswalks (Per CVC 21955) ...................... 11 Figure 8: Unmarked Midblock Crosswalk Right of Way ....................................................................... 12 Figure 9: Preliminary Inventory of Uncontrolled, Marked Crosswalks .................................................. 13 Figure 10: Flowchart A –Crossing Evaluation Process for Existing and Proposed Marked Crosswalks .... 19 Figure 11: Flowchart B – Potential Improvements Review ................................................................... 21 Figure 12: Pedestrian Crossing Improvements by Roadway Configuration, Speed Limit and AADT ........ 22 Figure 13: Flowchart C - Removal of Existing Crossing ........................................................................ 24 Figure 14: Monterey Bay Coastal Recreational Trail Crossing .............................................................. 27 Figure 15: North Fremont Street Median Cycle Track Bike Exclusive Crossing ...................................... 28 Figure 16: Decorative Crosswalk in Cannery Row ............................................................................... 29 List of Appendices
Applicable Codes and Guidelines
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
Assembly Bill No. 413
Monterey City Code
California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
Flowchart D – Curb Ramps at T-intersections
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 11, Packet Page 215 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
5 Introduction
The City of Monterey's Crosswalk Policy aims to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility. A holistic pedestrian safety plan integrates four key components: engineering, enhancement, enforcement, and education programs. This policy specifically emphasizes the engineering and enhancement components.

This document covers the following topics:

1. Pedestrian Crossing Types, Rights-of-Way, and Legal Context

2. City of Monterey’s Existing Pedestrian Safety and Mobility Policies

3. Existing Crosswalk Evaluation Criteria

4. New, Proposed Crosswalk Policies and Evaluation Criteria

5. Special Scenarios – Trail and Bicycle Crossings and Decorative Crosswalks The purpose of this Crosswalk Policy is to provide the City of Monterey with standard evaluation criteria, policies, and improvement types for existing and new pedestrian crossings. The evaluation criteria for existing crosswalks provides direction on whether they should be unmarked, marked or enhanced. The evaluation criteria for new crosswalks provides direction on whether the proposed location is suitable for a crosswalk. This document also provides crosswalk improvements that meet the City’s standards and describes the policy for crosswalk removals.

The decision to install, remove, or enhance a crosswalk should be made on the basis of engineering judgment. This policy provides a formal and transparent process for crosswalk applications, but it should not be considered a substitute for engineering judgment.

Crosswalk Fundamentals
Pedestrian crossings, also known as crosswalks, can occur in many different types and locations. The varied types of crosswalks and legal right-of-way attributed to different roadway users can cause confusion. This section reviews the different types and locations of crosswalks and who has the legal right-of-way at each type.

Types of Crosswalks
 Location: Intersection or Midblock
 Control: Controlled or Uncontrolled
 Marking: Marked or Unmarked
Location: Intersection or Midblock
Pedestrian crossings may occur at either intersection or midblock locations. Intersections consist of two or more roadways intersecting each other. The pedestrian path of travel along each roadway creates pedestrian crossings of the intersecting roadway. These crossings may be controlled or uncontrolled and marked or unmarked. Midblock pedestrian crossings occur between intersections. These crossings may also be controlled or uncontrolled and marked or unmarked. See Figure 1 for a representation of crosswalks at intersection and midblock locations.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 12, Packet Page 216 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
6 Figure 1: Location of Crosswalks
Control: Controlled or Uncontrolled
Crosswalks at intersections can have either controlled or uncontrolled approaches. Controlled approaches have either a traffic signal or a stop sign. Uncontrolled approaches have either a yield sign or no sign. See Figure 2 for a depiction of crosswalks at controlled approaches and Figure 3 for crosswalks at uncontrolled approaches.

Figure 2: Crosswalks at Controlled Approaches
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 13, Packet Page 217 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
7 Figure 3: Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Approaches
Marking: Marked or Unmarked
Crosswalks may be marked with striping that is white or yellow, in school areas only, or may be unmarked with no striping delineating the pedestrian crossing. Figure 4 shows the difference between marked and unmarked crosswalks.

Figure 4: Marked or Unmarked Crosswalks
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 14, Packet Page 218 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
8 Pedestrian Crossing Laws
Many laws in the California Vehicle Code (CVC) dictate the type, function and legality of pedestrian crossings. The CVC also states which road users have the right-of-way based on the location along a roadway and on the type of crosswalk, if present. The following is a summary of pertinent codes related to crosswalks:
 275 – Crosswalks exist at all intersections, marked or unmarked, and at midblock locations that are marked unless there is a signage prohibiting pedestrian crossings  21950 – Drivers of vehicles shall yield the right-of-way to pedestrians at all intersection crosswalks, both marked and unmarked, and at marked midblock crosswalks  21954 – At all locations not covered by Section 21950 pedestrians shall yield the right-of-way to vehicles
 21955 – Pedestrians shall not cross a roadway segment that has traffic signals at the nearest intersections on both end of the roadway segment
The sections below further discuss and clarify the pedestrian crossing laws at intersection and midblock locations per the CVC.

Intersection Crosswalks and Rights-of-Way
Figure 5 depicts the legal locations of crosswalks per CVC 275 and the rights-of-way per CVC 21950. As shown in the figure, crosswalks #1 and #2 are marked and crosswalks #3 and #4 are unmarked. These all represent legal locations for pedestrians to cross. Drivers of vehicles and bicyclists shall yield the rightof-way to pedestrians at all four locations. All roadway users shall use due care at these locations for the safety of all users.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 15, Packet Page 219 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
9 Figure 5: Intersection Crosswalks and Rights-of-Way
Midblock Crosswalks and Rights-of-Way
The legal conditions regarding pedestrian crossings midblock, away from intersections, is more nuanced than at intersections. Midblock crosswalks, as defined by CVC 275, exist only when the crossing is marked. Drivers of vehicles are required to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians only at marked midblock crossing per CVC 21950. This type of crossing is illustrated in Figure 6.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 16, Packet Page 220 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
10 Figure 6: Marked Midblock Crossing Right-of-Way
However, pedestrians are also allowed to cross at unmarked midblock locations with due care under the following circumstances:
 The nearest intersections in both directions are both not controlled by traffic signals (CVC 21955) as shown in Figure 7.
 Pedestrians yield the right-of-way to drivers of vehicles and bicyclists (CVC 21954) as shown in Figure 8.

It is important to note that these codes do not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for their safety and do not relieve the driver of a vehicle from the duty to exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian (CVC 21950).

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 17, Packet Page 221 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
11 Figure 7: Allowable and Unallowable Unmarked Midblock Crossings (Per CVC 21955) Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 18, Packet Page 222 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
12 Figure 8: Unmarked Midblock Crosswalk Right-of-Way
Existing Crosswalks
Monterey has many existing marked crosswalks throughout the City. These crosswalks are located on different roadway functional classification types and in proximity to differing types of land uses. To date existing crosswalks have been reviewed for compliance ad hoc and against varying technical criteria, since the City of Monterey has not had a formalized crosswalk policy.

This policy will outline when and against which criteria the City should evaluate existing crosswalks to determine if they meet current standards, need improvements or should be removed.

Existing Uncontrolled, Marked Crosswalk Preliminary Inventory Although a complete inventory of marked crosswalks has not yet been compiled, a preliminary inventory of uncontrolled, marked crosswalks has been compiled by City staff. An overview map of the preliminary inventory is shown in Figure 9.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 19, Packet Page 223 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
13 Figure 9: Preliminary Inventory of Existing Uncontrolled, Marked Crosswalks Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 20, Packet Page 224 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
14 Existing Pedestrian Plans and Policies
The City of Monterey has several existing pedestrian safety and mobility plans and policies that are pertinent to the Crosswalk Policy. The relevant portions of the following plans and policies are discussed in this section:
 Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
 Move Monterey - Multimodal Plan for the City of Monterey  City Council Mission Statement
 ADA Transition Plan
Monterey 2031 General Plan Update
The City of Monterey’s current General Plan, Monterey 2031 General Plan Update, was adopted in July 2024. The following excerpts from the General Plan’s Circulation Element pertain to the City’s policies regarding pedestrian safety and mobility.

Circulation Element
Transportation and Land Use
Goal a. A transportation network that is complemented by land uses that are easily accessible by walking, bicycling, or utilizing transit.

Policy a.1. Continue to apply land-use planning tools and strategies that support the City's circulation goals and direct growth to areas best served by alternative modes of transportation.

Policy a.2. Continue to use land-use policies to concentrate development within walking distance of the transit system.

Policy a.3. Encourage transit/pedestrian-oriented (TOD/POD) designs in mixed-use neighborhoods.

Policy a.10. Require proposed developments to provide ADA improvements, sidewalks or pedestrian connections, bicycle facilities, or transit facilities which would provide active transportation access to the development.

Street System
Goal b. A safe and well-maintained roadway system that efficiently moves people and goods across all modes of transportation.

Policy b.1. Create and maintain a roadway system of “Complete Streets” that is safe and easy to use for all modes of transportation.

Policy b.2. Consider the needs of buses, bicyclists, and pedestrians when planning all road improvements.

Policy b.4. Prioritize bicycle and pedestrian mobility improvements over vehicle convenience.

Policy b.5. Implement the City’s multimodal plan to integrate and implement the circulation element policies and update as needed.

Policy b.6. Establish a list of guidelines and considerations for Complete Streets in the City’s multimodal plan, maximizing safety through design.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 21, Packet Page 225 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
15 Pedestrian
Goal d. A safe, accessible, connected and integrated pedestrian transportation network that encourages walking as a primary mode of transportation for residents, employees and visitors.

Policy d.1. Design pedestrian facilities that take into account users of all abilities and ages.

Policy d.2. Design intersections to improve pedestrian safety and mobility.

Policy d.3. Increase pedestrian connectivity between neighborhoods and major city and regional destinations.

Policy d.4. Establish and maintain a current list of pedestrian improvement projects in the City’s multimodal plan to create a continuous pedestrian network throughout the City.

Policy d.5. Establish Crosswalk Guidelines which provide standards for the strategic placement of pedestrian crossings throughout the City in the City’s multimodal plan, as well as the basis for relocating and eliminating crosswalks.

Policy d.6. Continue to identify and prioritize projects which would improve accessibility for all pedestrians, such as ADA ramps, audible pedestrian signals, sidewalk widenings or any other transportation infrastructure improvement that could improve accessibility.

Policy d.7. Require that development projects provide internal pedestrian connections and linkages to adjacent public streets, neighborhoods and community facilities. Ensure that projects are designed and/or retrofitted to be efficiently served by buses, bike routes and pedestrians connections.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 22, Packet Page 226 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
16 Vision Zero
Goal h. A transportation network supported by projects and programs that work towards zero collisions involving serious or fatal injuries.

Policy h.1. Prioritize safety over congestion.

Policy h.2. Prioritize transportation improvements that enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety.

Policy h.3. Prioritize transportation projects at locations which have been identified as high collision intersections/segments.

Policy h.6. Incorporate the five E’s of safety (Education, Engineering, Enforcement, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technology) when addressing safety concerns.

Policy h.8. Collaborate with Monterey Peninsula Unified School District (MPUSD), Monterey Fire Department (MFD) and Monterey Police Department (MPD) on education and enforcement programs, including promoting “Safe Routes to School” Programs.

Move Monterey - Multimodal Plan for the City of Monterey Move Monterey is the City of Monterey’s multimodal transportation plan document. The multimodal plan was last updated and adopted in May 2021. Move Monterey covers the following policies and topics:
 Complete Streets
 Pedestrians
 Bicycles
 Safe Routes to Schools
 Transportation Demand Management
 Vehicles Miles Traveled
 Vision Zero
 Implementation
The document provides tools for enhancing pedestrian mobility such as enhanced trail crossings, wider sidewalks, curb extension, curb return radius reduction, removal of free right turn slip lanes, pedestrian refuge islands, high-visibility crosswalk striping, and rectangular rapid-flashing beacons.

Move Monterey does not include an existing inventory of sidewalks or pedestrian crossings; however, it identifies the collecting of this data as two proposed projects. The plan also includes the continuation of the City’s ADA Transition Plan and other specific pedestrian improvements listed in the appendices.

City Council Vision, Mission, Value Drivers, and Strategic Priorities On December 7, 2021 the City of Monterey City Council established the following cascading goals:
 Vision is a description of Monterey’s “desired future”;  Mission identifies the role of the City of Monterey in pursuing the City’s Vision;  Value Drivers identifies what is important to the community to support the City’s Mission;  Strategic Priorities describes how the City can advance its goals in support of the Value Drivers; and the
 City Staff Work Program is a set of specific program, policy, or projects that support the City’s Strategic Priorities.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 23, Packet Page 227 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
17 Pedestrian mobility is addressed in the Active Mobility Strategic Priority and one of its underpinning goals is:

CONTINUE TO ENHANCE MOBILITY FOR PEOPLE OF ALL AGES AND ABILITIES.

Staff work program efforts to accomplish this goal include the following (status updates as of August 2023 in italics):
 Complete an update to the City’s ADA Transition Plan. o ADA Transition Plan work began in 2022 and is expected to conclude in late 2023 following a public engagement process.
 Continue the implementation of ADA-compliant curb ramps funded by Measure P/S. o Ongoing.
 Continue to implement APS (Audible Pedestrian Signal) installation at signalized intersections. o Ongoing.
 Continue to look for opportunities to enhance the transportation network to include pedestrian and bike facilities.
o Ongoing.
 Continue to procure grants in order to provide safety education and encourage programs such as Safe Routes to School to encourage more walking and biking. o Ongoing.

ADA Transition Plan
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 provides prohibits discrimination against people who have disabilities. Title II of the Act requires specifics accommodations within the public right-of-way.

Public agencies are required to develop a Program Access Plan, also known as a Transition Plan.

The City of Monterey is currently updating its ADA Transition Plan. The previous plan was completed March 11, 2013 and recently updated on December 17,2024.

The City’s ADA Transition Plan provides the following:
 Identifies physical obstacles in the public entity's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities  Assesses the extent of architectural barriers to program accessibility in the public rights-of-way  Describes in detail the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible  Estimates costs for mitigation solutions
 Specifies the steps necessary to achieve compliance
 Provides a schedule for barrier removal/mitigation
 Sets priorities for barrier elimination
 Indicates the official responsible for implementation of the plan Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 24, Packet Page 228 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
18 Evaluating Existing Crosswalks
This policy sets forth the standard process for evaluating existing controlled and uncontrolled pedestrian crossings.

When to Evaluate
In order to standardize the process for evaluating existing crosswalks, reviews of existing crosswalks should generally be limited to the following occasions:
 City capital improvement project
 City maintenance project involving pavement resurfacing or reconstruction  Public request
 Pedestrian-involved collision at uncontrolled crossing  City Traffic Engineer’s discretion
Once a review has been completed, the outcome of the review should be valid for until a substantial change in conditions has occurred. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires projects that may substantially change traffic conditions be evaluated for impacts. Projects that may conflict with this policy once adopted or that only substantially increase hazards will be required to evaluate locations which may be impacted and mitigate impacts if necessary. A log of all reviews should be maintained stating the date and outcome of the review.

Evaluation Criteria
After deciding if a crosswalk should be reviewed, see Flowchart A in Figure 10 for the evaluation flowchart to determine if the study crosswalk meets City standards, needs improvements or should be considered for removal. The evaluation is divided between controlled and uncontrolled approaches. The main criteria for marking crosswalks in Monterey is the pedestrian crossing’s proximity to major pedestrian generators, such as schools, libraries, parks, community centers, transit centers, hospitals, major retail areas and senior housing. These locations are expected to produce sufficient pedestrian usage to warrant marking the crosswalk to warn other road users of the expected presence of a pedestrian. Flowchart A outlines the decision-making flow and additional criteria to utilize during the crosswalk evaluation.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 25, Packet Page 229 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
19 Figure 10: Flowchart A –Crossing Evaluation Process for Existing and Proposed Marked Crosswalks Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 26, Packet Page 230 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
20 Decision Outcomes
The evaluation of existing crosswalks will yield the following three outcomes:
 Meets standards
 Needs improvement
 Remove
Meets Standard
If the evaluation of the crossing shows that the location and design are in compliance with current standards and City of Monterey guidelines, then no further action is required.

Needs Improvement
If the evaluation of the crossing shows that the location is in compliance with current standards and City of Monterey guidelines, but the design is not in compliance, then the crosswalk should be considered for modifications to meet compliance. See Flowchart B in Figure 11 to evaluate the need for improvements to the existing crossing.

Policy For Modifying Existing Crosswalks
Existing crosswalks, if meeting the criteria of Flowchart A, should be reviewed to see if any physical improvements are required per Flowchart B. Items to review for improvements include:
 ADA-compliance of curb ramps and adjacent sidewalk
 High-visibility crosswalk markings per the latest City standard detail.  Compliance with AB 413 Daylighting Law or any applicable City of Monterey Code Additional improvements may be considered at the crossing based on the roadway characteristics, i.e. number of lanes, speeds and vehicle volumes, adjacent land uses or the volume of pedestrians.

The typical improvements to be considered for uncontrolled crossings are the following:
 Marked crosswalk per latest City of Monterey Standard Detail  Marked crosswalk plus warning signs (W11-2 and W16-7P)  Marked crosswalk plus warning signs plus rectangular rapid-flashing beacon (RRFB) FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations (Figure 12) should be utilized to determine when the above treatments are recommended based on the roadway configuration.

FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations and Move Monterey may be consulted for additional improvements at the crossing location. Pedestrian hybrid beacons are not an approved treatment per this policy.

See the Special Scenarios section for guidance on multiuse trail crossings, bicycle crossings and decorative crosswalks.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 27, Packet Page 231 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
21 Figure 11: Flowchart B – Potential Improvements Review Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 28, Packet Page 232 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
22 Figure 12: Pedestrian Crossing Improvements by Roadway Configuration, Speed Limit and AADT Source: FHWA’s Guide for Improvement Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations Consider for Removal
If the evaluation of the existing crosswalk shows that the crosswalk location and design are not in compliance with current standards and City of Monterey guidelines and improvements are not elected, then the crosswalk should be removed.

Policy For Removal Of Existing Crosswalks
Conditions that contribute to the need for a crosswalk or crossing treatments may change over time, and an existing crosswalk or treatment may no longer be needed.

The potential removal of an existing crosswalk should be evaluated according to Flowchart C in Figure

13. If the use of a crosswalk does not meet current criteria, the crosswalk should be removed following the City of Monterey and CVC removal procedures.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 29, Packet Page 233 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
23 The California Vehicle Code, Section 21950.5, states the following:
(a) An existing marked crosswalk may not be removed unless notice and opportunity to be heard is provided to the public not less than 30 days prior to the scheduled date of removal. In addition to any other public notice requirements, the notice of proposed removal shall be posted at the crosswalk identified for removal.
(b) The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include, but is not limited to, notification to the public of both of the following:
(1) That the public may provide input relating to the scheduled removal. (2) The form and method of providing the input authorized by paragraph (1).

A public meeting shall precede the removal with the ability of the public to provide input via phone, email, or letter as well as attend the public meeting. Notice will be visibly posted for a minimum of 30 days prior at the crossing location to inform the public of the intent to remove them. City contact information will be provided on these notices.

The crossing slated for removal should have the crosswalk markings removed and should not be allowed to fade or wear away (CA MUTCD 3B.18.29). The crosswalk should be removed by grinding or approved equivalent method and then the road shall be resealed by slurry or fog seal until no crosswalk remnants or scaring is visible. Any pedestrian crossing signs, i.e. W11-2 or others, shall also be removed.

Consideration should be given to providing pedestrian barricades and/or guide signs to legally restrict crossings, if necessary, and to provide direction to the nearest crossing.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 30, Packet Page 234 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
24 Figure 13: Flowchart C - Removal of Existing Crosswalk Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 31, Packet Page 235 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
25 New, Proposed Crosswalks
The initial step in pinpointing potential sites for marked crosswalks involves identifying areas where people want to walk, also known as pedestrian desire lines, which are influenced by land uses such as homes, schools, parks, commercial areas, and transit stops. The ultimate aim is to establish a convenient, connected, and continuous walking environment.

This policy will outline when and against which criteria the City should evaluate the addition of new crosswalks to determine if the proposed location meets criteria for marking and/or additional improvements or should not be marked.

Evaluating New, Proposed Crosswalks
This policy sets forth the standard process for evaluating the proposed installation of a marked crosswalk at controlled and uncontrolled pedestrian crossings. The review of new, proposed crosswalks should generally follow the evaluation of existing crosswalks except that removal is not an outcome. See Flowchart A in Figure 10 for the overview evaluation process of proposed new crosswalks. See Flowchart D in the Appendix for the evaluation process for constructing curb ramps at t-intersections.

When to Evaluate
In order to standardize the process for evaluating crosswalks, reviews of proposed crosswalks should generally be limited to the following occasions:
 City capital improvement project
 City maintenance project involving pavement resurfacing or reconstruction  Private development with potential transportation impacts  Public request
 City Traffic Engineer’s discretion
Once a review has been completed, the outcome of the review should be valid for until a substantial change in conditions has occurred. A log of all reviews should be maintained stating the date and outcome of the review.

Evaluation Criteria
After deciding if a crosswalk should be reviewed, see Flowchart A in Figure 10 for the evaluation flowchart to determine if the study crosswalk meets City standards or needs improvements. The evaluation is divided between controlled and uncontrolled approaches. The main criteria for marking crosswalks in Monterey is the proposed crosswalk’s proximity to major pedestrian generators, such as schools, libraries, parks, community centers, transit centers, hospitals, major retail areas and senior housing.

These locations are expected to produce sufficient pedestrian usage to warrant marking the crosswalk to warn other road users of the expected presence of a pedestrian. Flowchart A outlines the decisionmaking flow and additional criteria to utilize during the crosswalk evaluation.

Decision Outcomes
The evaluation of proposed marked crosswalks will yield the following three outcomes:

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 32, Packet Page 236 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
26  Meets standards
 Needs improvement
 Do not implement crosswalk
Meets Standard
If the evaluation of the proposed crosswalk shows that the location is in compliance with current standards and City of Monterey guidelines, then the crosswalk can remain as is or with improvements based on the guidelines in the following section.

Needs Improvement
Existing and proposed crosswalks, if meeting the criteria of Flowchart A, should be reviewed to see if any physical improvements are required per Flowchart B. Items to review for improvements include:
 ADA-compliance of curb ramps and adjacent sidewalk
 High-visibility crosswalk markings per the latest City standard detail.  Compliance with AB 413 Daylighting Law or any applicable City of Monterey Code Additional improvements may be considered at the crossing based on the roadway characteristics, i.e. number of lanes, speeds and vehicle volumes, adjacent land uses or the volume of pedestrians.

The typical improvements to be considered for uncontrolled crossings are the following:
 Marked crosswalk per latest City of Monterey Standard Detail  Marked crosswalk plus warning signs (W11-2 and W16-7P)  Marked crosswalk plus warning signs plus rectangular rapid-flashing beacon (RRFB) FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations (Figure 12) should be utilized to determine when the above treatments are recommended based on the roadway configuration.

FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations and Move Monterey may be consulted for additional improvements at the crossing location. Pedestrian hybrid beacons are not an approved treatment per this policy.

See the Special Scenarios section for guidance on multiuse trail crossings, bicycle crossings and decorative crosswalks.

Do Not Implement
If the evaluation of the proposed crosswalk shows that the crosswalk location is not in compliance with current standards and City of Monterey guidelines and improvements are not elected, then the crosswalk should not be implemented.

Special Scenarios
Several special scenarios, such as trail crossings, bicycle crossings and decorative crosswalks, may require different reviews or different improvement processes. Any application of a non-standard crosswalk striping or treatment shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 33, Packet Page 237 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
27 Trail crossings
Monterey has several multiuse trails, or Class I trails, with the most notable being the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreational Trail. Multiuse trail crossings represent a special type of crossing that may facilitate different active mode users, i.e. pedestrians, cyclists, skateboarders, roller skaters, walkers, joggers, etc.

Trail crossings, the same as other crossing types, may be at an intersection or midblock and across controlled or uncontrolled approaches.

Figure 14: Monterey Bay Coastal Recreational Trail Crossing Source: Kimley-Horn
All trail crossings should be marked with high-visibility crosswalk striping. All uncontrolled trail crossings should be accompanied by a trail crossing warning sign (W11-15) and diagonal downward pointing arrow sign (W16-7P). Due to the potential high crossing volumes, consideration should also be given for advanced warning signs, advanced yield markings and signs, raised crossing/continuous sidewalk and/or rectangular rapid-flashing beacons based on the context of the crossing per FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations.

Bicycle crossings
Bicycle crossings may be striped separately from other users based on the bicycle facility context. Bicycle lanes and cycle tracks may be striped across intersections to provide enhanced warning for vehicles crossing their path or to better direct cyclists across an intersection because of a shifting alignment. One current application of bicycle crossing striping is found along the North Fremont Street median cycle track. As seen in Figure 15, the cycle track crossing is striped through the intersection and the cyclist crossing areas are marked separate from the pedestrian crossing areas.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 34, Packet Page 238 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
28 Figure 15: North Fremont Street Median Cycle Track Bike Exclusive Crossing Source: Nearmap
Decorative crosswalks
The City of Monterey has several existing applications of decorative crosswalks such as Cannery Row and several Neighborhood and Community Improvement Programs.

The use of decorative, or creative, crosswalks must be approved by the City Council upon a determination by the City Traffic Engineer that the design complies with this policy. See the Decorative Crosswalk Guidelines section for implementation guidelines.

Decorative Crosswalk Guidelines
Decorative, or creative, crosswalks are used to create a sense of place and designs tend to correlate with the specific district or community in which they are located. The design of decorative crosswalks often, but are not limited, to the following styles:
 Colored striping
 Colored pavement
 Textured surface – concrete, asphalt, brick
There are various existing instances of decorative crosswalks within Monterey. Most notably the Monterey Bay Coastal Recreational Trail is marked with decorative crosswalks in the Cannery Row area as seen in Figure 16.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 35, Packet Page 239 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
29 Figure 16: Decorative Crosswalk in Cannery Row
Source: Kimley-Horn
Decorative crosswalks have several limiting factors to their widespread use, including:
 Design parameters
 Cost
 Maintenance
Design Parameters

CA MUTCD
The design of decorative crosswalks must meet certain parameters in order to not be confused with other traffic markings. Decorative crosswalks shall maintain white, or yellow if in a school area, transverse lines on both sides of the crosswalk. The colors within the white, or yellow, stripes shall not be yellow or white and should not degrade the contrast with the crosswalk lines (2014, Rev 9, CA MUTCD 3G.06).

FHWA Interpretation Letter 3(09)-24(I)
FHWA guidance (FHWA Interpretation Letter 3(09)-24(I)) recommends the following design parameters:
 Treatments
o Non-reflective paint
o Brick lattice pattern
o Paving bricks
o Paving stones
o Setts
o Cobbles
 Colors
o Red
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 36, Packet Page 240 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
30 o Rust
o Brown
o Burgundy
o Clay
o Tan
o Or similar earth tones
 Uniform or consistent patterns as to avoid distraction  Consider buffer between color and transverse crosswalk marking MUTCD
Decorative crosswalks shall be consistent with Section 3H.03 of the December 2023 Edition of the MUTCD “Aesthetic Surface Treatments.”
Cost/Maintenance
Since decorative crosswalks require enhanced maintenance compared to standard crosswalks, their use should be carefully considered
Implementation Guidelines
The location for any decorative crosswalk must meet the requirements in this policy.

City Staff may propose decorative crosswalk designs and locations to the City Council for approval.

In addition to proposals submitted by City Staff, the City Council may invite proposals from the public for decorative crosswalk designs for installation at pre-designated locations. The request for proposals will set forth the design criteria, process, and terms and conditions for the submittal and selection of crosswalk designs.

Prior to any City Council decorative crosswalk design approval, the City Traffic Engineer shall evaluate crosswalk designs and make recommendations to the City Council based on safety standards.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 37, Packet Page 241 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
31 Appendix
Applicable Codes and Guidelines
California Vehicle Code (CVC)
DIVISION 1. WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED [100 - 681]
(Division 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
275. “Crosswalk” is either:
(a) That portion of a roadway included within the prolongation or connection of the boundary lines of sidewalks at intersections where the intersecting roadways meet at approximately right angles, except the prolongation of such lines from an alley across a street. (b) Any portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface.

Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, there shall not be a crosswalk where local authorities have placed signs indicating no crossing.
(Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
DIVISION 11. RULES OF THE ROAD [21000 - 23336]
(Division 11 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
CHAPTER 2. Traffic Signs, Signals, and Markings [21350 - 21468] (Chapter 2 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
ARTICLE 1. Erection and Maintenance [21350 - 21376]
(Article 1 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
21368. Whenever a marked pedestrian crosswalk has been established in a roadway contiguous to a school building or the grounds thereof, it shall be painted or marked in yellow as shall be all the marked pedestrian crosswalks at an intersection in case any one of the crosswalks is required to be marked in yellow. Other established marked pedestrian crosswalks may be painted or marked in yellow if either (a) the nearest point of the crosswalk is not more than 600 feet from a school building or the grounds thereof, or (b) the nearest point of the crosswalk is not more than 2,800 feet from a school building or the grounds thereof, there are no intervening crosswalks other than those contiguous to the school grounds, and it appears that the facts and circumstances require special painting or marking of the crosswalks for the protection and safety of persons attending the school. There shall be painted or marked in yellow on each side of the street in the lane or lanes leading to all yellow marked crosswalks the following words, “SLOW—SCHOOL XING,” except that such words shall not be painted or marked in any lane leading to a crosswalk at an intersection controlled by stop signs, traffic signals, or yield right-of-way signs. A crosswalk shall not be painted or marked yellow at any location other than as required or permitted in this section.
(Amended by Stats. 1976, Ch. 232.)
CHAPTER 5. Pedestrians’ Rights and Duties [21949 - 21971] (Chapter 5 enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 38, Packet Page 242 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
32 21949. (a) The Legislature hereby finds and declares that it is the policy of the State of California that safe and convenient pedestrian travel and access, whether by foot, wheelchair, walker, or stroller, be provided to the residents of the state.
(b) In accordance with the policy declared under subdivision (a), it is the intent of the Legislature that all levels of government in the state, particularly the Department of Transportation, work to provide convenient and safe passage for pedestrians on and across all streets and highways, increase levels of walking and pedestrian travel, and reduce pedestrian fatalities and injuries. (Added by Stats. 2000, Ch. 833, Sec. 6. Effective January 1, 2001.) 21950. (a) The driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
(b) This section does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for their safety. No pedestrian may suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle that is so close as to constitute an immediate hazard. No pedestrian may unnecessarily stop or delay traffic while in a marked or unmarked crosswalk.
(c) The driver of a vehicle approaching a pedestrian within any marked or unmarked crosswalk shall exercise all due care and shall reduce the speed of the vehicle or take any other action relating to the operation of the vehicle as necessary to safeguard the safety of the pedestrian. (d) Subdivision (b) does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within any marked crosswalk or within any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection.
(e) (1) A peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, shall not stop a pedestrian for a violation of this section unless a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of a collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power.
(2) This subdivision does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for their safety. (3) This subdivision does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within the roadway.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 957, Sec. 8. (AB 2147) Effective January 1, 2023.) 21950.5. (a) An existing marked crosswalk may not be removed unless notice and opportunity to be heard is provided to the public not less than 30 days prior to the scheduled date of removal. In addition to any other public notice requirements, the notice of proposed removal shall be posted at the crosswalk identified for removal.
(b) The notice required by subdivision (a) shall include, but is not limited to, notification to the public of both of the following:
(1) That the public may provide input relating to the scheduled removal. (2) The form and method of providing the input authorized by paragraph (1). (Added by Stats. 2000, Ch. 833, Sec. 9. Effective January 1, 2001.) Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 39, Packet Page 243 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
33 21951. Whenever any vehicle has stopped at a marked crosswalk or at any unmarked crosswalk at an intersection to permit a pedestrian to cross the roadway the driver of any other vehicle approaching from the rear shall not overtake and pass the stopped vehicle. (Enacted by Stats. 1959, Ch. 3.)
21954. (a) Every pedestrian upon a roadway at any point other than within a marked crosswalk or within an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles upon the roadway so near as to constitute an immediate hazard.
(b) The provisions of this section shall not relieve the driver of a vehicle from the duty to exercise due care for the safety of any pedestrian upon a roadway.
(c) (1) A peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, shall not stop a pedestrian for a violation of subdivision (a) unless a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of a collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power.
(2) This subdivision does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for their safety. (3) This subdivision does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within the roadway.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 957, Sec. 10. (AB 2147) Effective January 1, 2023.) 21955. (a) Between adjacent intersections controlled by traffic control signal devices or by police officers, pedestrians shall not cross the roadway at any place except in a crosswalk. (b) (1) A peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, shall not stop a pedestrian for a violation of subdivision (a) unless a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of a collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power.
(2) This subdivision does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for their safety. (3) This subdivision does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within the roadway.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 957, Sec. 11. (AB 2147) Effective January 1, 2023.) 21956. (a) A pedestrian shall not walk upon a roadway outside of a business or residence district otherwise than close to the pedestrian’s left-hand edge of the roadway. (b) A pedestrian may walk close to their right-hand edge of the roadway if a crosswalk or other means of safely crossing the roadway is not available or if existing traffic or other conditions would compromise the safety of a pedestrian attempting to cross the road. (c) (1) A peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, shall not stop a pedestrian for a violation of this section unless a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of a collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power.
(2) This subdivision does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for their safety.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 40, Packet Page 244 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
34 (3) This subdivision does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within the roadway.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 957, Sec. 12. (AB 2147) Effective January 1, 2023.) 21961. (a) This chapter does not prevent local authorities from adopting ordinances prohibiting pedestrians from crossing roadways at other than crosswalks. (b) (1) A peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, shall not stop a pedestrian for a violation of an ordinance adopted by a local authority pursuant to this section, unless a reasonably careful person would realize there is an immediate danger of a collision with a moving vehicle or other device moving exclusively by human power. (2) This subdivision does not relieve a pedestrian from the duty of using due care for their safety. (3) This subdivision does not relieve a driver of a vehicle from the duty of exercising due care for the safety of any pedestrian within the roadway.
(Amended by Stats. 2022, Ch. 957, Sec. 13. (AB 2147) Effective January 1, 2023.) Assembly Bill No. 413
22500. A person shall not stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle whether attended or unattended, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a peace officer or official traffic control device, in any of the following places:
(a) Within an intersection, except adjacent to curbs as may be permitted by local ordinance. (b) On a crosswalk, except that a bus engaged as a common carrier or a taxicab may stop in an unmarked crosswalk to load or unload passengers when authorized by the legislative body of a city pursuant to an ordinance.
(c) Between a safety zone and the adjacent right-hand curb or within the area between the zone and the curb as may be indicated by a sign or red paint on the curb, which sign or paint was erected or placed by local authorities pursuant to an ordinance.
(d) Within 15 feet of the driveway entrance to a fire station. This subdivision does not apply to any vehicle owned or operated by a fire department and clearly marked as a fire department vehicle. (e) (1) In front of a public or private driveway, except that a bus engaged as a common carrier, school bus, or a taxicab may stop to load or unload passengers when authorized by local authorities pursuant to an ordinance.
(2) In unincorporated territory, where the entrance of a private road or driveway is not delineated by an opening in a curb or by other curb construction, so much of the surface of the ground as is paved, surfaced, or otherwise plainly marked by vehicle use as a private road or driveway entrance, shall constitute a driveway.
(f) On a portion of a sidewalk, or with the body of the vehicle extending over a portion of a sidewalk, except electric carts when authorized by local ordinance, as specified in Section 21114.5. Lights, mirrors, or devices that are required to be mounted upon a vehicle under this code may extend from the body of the vehicle over the sidewalk to a distance of not more than 10 inches. (g) Alongside or opposite a street or highway excavation or obstruction when stopping, standing, or parking would obstruct traffic.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 41, Packet Page 245 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
35 (h) On the roadway side of a vehicle stopped, parked, or standing at the curb or edge of a highway, except for a school bus when stopped to load or unload pupils in a business or residence district where the speed limit is 25 miles per hour or less.
(i) Except as provided under Section 22500.5, alongside curb space authorized for the loading and unloading of passengers of a bus engaged as a common carrier in local transportation when indicated by a sign or red paint on the curb erected or painted by local authorities pursuant to an ordinance. (j) In a tube or tunnel, except vehicles of the authorities in charge, being used in the repair, maintenance, or inspection of the facility.
(k) Upon a bridge, except vehicles of the authorities in charge, being used in the repair, maintenance, or inspection of the facility, and except that buses engaged as a common carrier in local transportation may stop to load or unload passengers upon a bridge where sidewalks are provided, when authorized by local authorities pursuant to an ordinance, and except that local authorities pursuant to an ordinance or the Department of Transportation pursuant to an order, within their respective jurisdictions, may permit parking on bridges having sidewalks and shoulders of sufficient width to permit parking without interfering with the normal movement of traffic on the roadway. Local authorities, by ordinance or resolution, may permit parking on these bridges on state highways in their respective jurisdictions if the ordinance or resolution is first approved in writing by the Department of Transportation. Parking shall not be permitted unless there are signs in place, as may be necessary, to indicate the provisions of local ordinances or the order of the Department of Transportation.
(l) In front of or upon that portion of a curb that has been cut down, lowered, or constructed to provide wheelchair accessibility to the sidewalk.
(m) In a portion of a highway that has been designated for the exclusive use of public transit buses. (n) (1) (A) Within 20 feet of the vehicle approach side of any marked or unmarked crosswalk or within 15 feet of any crosswalk where a curb extension is present. (B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), a local authority may establish a different distance if both of the following requirements are met:
(i) A local authority establishes the different distance by ordinance that includes a finding that the different distance is justified by established traffic safety standards. (ii) A local authority has marked the different distance at the intersection using paint or a sign. (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a local authority may permit commercial vehicle loading or unloading within 20 feet of the vehicle approach side of any marked or unmarked crosswalk or within 15 feet of any crosswalk where a curb extension is present if both of the following requirements are met:
(A) A local authority authorizes the commercial vehicle loading and unloading by ordinance and identifies the crosswalk or crosswalks in the ordinance. (B) A local authority has marked the commercial loading and unloading areas with paint or signage. (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a local authority may permit parking for bicycles or motorized scooters within 20 feet of a crosswalk.
(4) Prior to January 1, 2025, jurisdictions may only issue a warning, and shall not issue a citation, for a violation unless the violation occurs in an area marked using paint or a sign.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 42, Packet Page 246 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
36 SEC. 2. If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

Monterey City Code
Sec. 20-62. Establishment of crosswalks.
a. The Traffic Engineer is hereby authorized to establish and maintain crosswalks and to designate them by appropriate devices or painted signs upon the surface of the roadway. b. The Traffic Engineer may place signs at or adjacent to an intersection in respect to any crosswalk directing that pedestrians shall not cross in the crosswalk so indicated.

Sec. 20-63. Use of crosswalks required in certain areas.

No pedestrian shall cross a roadway other than by a crosswalk in any business district.

Sec. 20-64. Obedience to pedestrian signals and traffic signals.

Pedestrians shall obey the indication of special traffic signals installed for pedestrians only and shall disregard the indication of a vehicular traffic signal at any location where special pedestrian traffic signals are in place.

California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) Chapter 1A: General
Section 1A. 13 Definitions of Headings, Words, and Phrases in this Manual

11. Approach: all lanes of traffic moving toward an intersection or a midblock location from one direction, including any adjacent parking lane(s).

44. Crosswalk—(a) that part of a roadway at an intersection included within the connections of the lateral lines of the sidewalks on opposite sides of the highway measured from the curbs or in the absence of curbs, from the edges of the traversable roadway, and in the absence of a sidewalk on one side of the roadway, the part of a roadway included within the extension of the lateral lines of the sidewalk at right angles to the center line; (b) any portion of a roadway at an intersection or elsewhere distinctly indicated as a pedestrian crossing by pavement marking lines on the surface, which might be supplemented by contrasting pavement texture, style, or color. As per CVC 275, "Crosswalk" is either: (a) That portion of a roadway included within the prolongation or connection of the boundary lines of sidewalks at intersections where the intersecting roadways meet at approximately right angles, except the prolongation of such lines from an alley across a street. (b) Any portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this section, there shall not be a crosswalk where local authorities have placed signs indicating no crossing.

45. Crosswalk Lines—white or yellow (in school areas per CVC 21368) pavement marking lines that identify a crosswalk.
140. Pedestrian Clearance Time—the time provided for a pedestrian crossing in a crosswalk, after leaving the curb or shoulder, to travel to the far side of the traveled way or to a median. 142. Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon— a special type of hybrid beacon used to warn and control traffic at an unsignalized location to assist pedestrians in crossing a street or highway at a marked crosswalk.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 43, Packet Page 247 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
37 241. Transverse Markings—pavement markings that are generally placed perpendicular and across the flow of traffic such as shoulder markings; word, symbol, and arrow markings; stop lines; crosswalk lines; speed measurement markings; parking space markings; and others.

CALIFORNIA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
PART 3 MARKINGS
Chapter 3B: Pavement and Curb Markings
Section 3B. 15 Transverse Markings
Standard:
01 Transverse markings, which include shoulder markings, word and symbol markings, arrows, stop lines, yield lines, crosswalk lines, speed measurement markings, speed reduction markings, speed hump markings, parking space markings, and others, shall be white unless otherwise provided in this Manual.
01a Crosswalk markings near schools shall be yellow. Refer to CVC 21368 and Part 7.

Guidance:
02 Because of the low approach angle at which pavement markings are viewed, transverse lines should be proportioned to provide visibility at least equal to that of longitudinal lines.

Support:
03 Refer to Caltrans’ Standard Plans for pavement marking letters, numerals and symbols. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication
Chapter 3B: Pavement and Curb Markings
Section 3B. 18 Crosswalk Markings
Support:
01 Crosswalk markings provide guidance for pedestrians who are crossing roadways by defining and delineating paths on approaches to and within signalized intersections, and on approaches to other intersections where traffic stops.
02 In conjunction with signs and other measures, crosswalk markings help to alert road users of a designated pedestrian crossing point across roadways at locations that are not controlled by traffic control signals or STOP or YIELD signs.
03 At non-intersection locations, crosswalk markings legally establish the crosswalk.

Standard:
04 When crosswalk lines are used, they shall consist of solid white lines that mark the crosswalk.

They shall not be less than 6 12 inches or greater than 24 inches in width.

Guidance:
05 If transverse lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the gap between the lines should not be less than 6 feet. If diagonal or longitudinal lines are used without transverse lines to mark a crosswalk, the crosswalk should be not less than 6 feet wide.
06 Crosswalk lines, if used on both sides of the crosswalk, should extend across the full width of pavement or to the edge of the intersecting crosswalk to discourage diagonal walking between crosswalks (see Figures 3B-17 and 3B-19).
07 At locations controlled by traffic control signals or on approaches controlled by STOP or YIELD signs, crosswalk lines should be installed where engineering judgment indicates they are needed to direct pedestrians to the proper crossing path(s).
08 Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study should be performed before a marked crosswalk is installed at a location away from a traffic control signal or an approach controlled Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 44, Packet Page 248 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
38 by a STOP or YIELD sign. The engineering study should consider the number of lanes, the presence of a median, the distance from adjacent signalized intersections, the pedestrian volumes and delays, the average daily traffic (ADT), the posted or statutory speed limit or 85th-percentile speed, the geometry of the location, the possible consolidation of multiple crossing points, the availability of street lighting, and other appropriate factors.
09 New marked crosswalks across uncontrolled roadways should include alone, without other measures designed to reduce traffic speeds, shorten crossing distances, enhance driver awareness of the crossing, and/or provide active warning of pedestrian presence, should not be installed across uncontrolled roadways where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and either:

A. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel without a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater; or
B. The roadway has four or more lanes of travel with a raised median or pedestrian refuge island and an ADT of 15,000 vehicles per day or greater.
09a If a marked crosswalk exists across an uncontrolled roadway where the speed limit exceeds 40 mph and the roadway has four or more lanes of travel and an ADT of 12,000 vehicles per day or greater, advanced yield lines with associated Yield Here to Pedestrians (R1-5, R1-5a) signs should be placed 20 to 50 ft in advance of the crosswalk, adequate visibility should be provided by parking prohibitions, pedestrian crossing (W11-2) warning signs with diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16- 7p) plaques should be installed at the crosswalk, and a high-visibility crosswalk marking pattern should be used (See Figure 3B-17(CA)).

Support:
10 Chapter 4F contains information on Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons. Section 4L.03 contains information regarding Warning Beacons to provide active warning of a pedestrian’s presence. Section 4N.02 contains information regarding In-Roadway Warning Lights at crosswalks. Chapter 7D contains information regarding school crossing supervision.

Guidance:
11 Because non-intersection pedestrian crossings are generally unexpected by the road user, warning signs (see Section 2C.50) should be installed for all marked crosswalks at non-intersection locations and adequate visibility should be provided by parking prohibitions.

Support:
12 Section 3B.16 contains information regarding placement of stop line markings near crosswalk markings.

Option:
13 For added visibility, the area of the crosswalk may be marked with white diagonal lines at a 45-degree angle to the line of the crosswalk or with white longitudinal lines parallel to traffic flow as shown in Figure 3B-19.
14 When diagonal or longitudinal lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the transverse crosswalk lines may be omitted
Guidance:
14a This type of marking should be used at locations where substantial numbers of pedestrians cross without any other traffic control device, at locations where physical conditions are such that added visibility of the crosswalk is desired, or at places where a pedestrian crosswalk might not be expected. 15 If used, the diagonal or longitudinal lines should be 12 to 24 inches wide and separated by gaps of 12 to 60 inches. The design of the lines and gaps should avoid the wheel paths if possible, and the gap between the lines should not exceed 2.5 times the width of the diagonal or longitudinal lines.

Option:
16 When an exclusive pedestrian phase that permits diagonal crossing of an intersection is provided at a traffic control signal, a marking as shown in Figure 3B-20 may be used for the crosswalk.

Guidance:

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 45, Packet Page 249 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
39 17 Crosswalk markings should be located so that the curb ramps are within the extension of the crosswalk markings.

Support:
18 Detectable warning surfaces mark boundaries between pedestrian and vehicular ways where there is no raised curb. Detectable warning surfaces are required by 49 CFR, Part 37 and by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) where curb ramps are constructed at the junction of sidewalks and the roadway, for marked and unmarked crosswalks. Detectable warning surfaces contrast visually with adjacent walking surfaces, either light-on-dark, or dark-on-light. The “Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG)” (see Section 1A.11) contains specifications for design and placement of detectable warning surfaces.

Standard:
19 Crosswalk markings near schools shall be yellow as provided in CVC 21368. See Part 7.

Option:
20 Pedestrian crosswalk markings may be placed at intersections, representing extensions of the sidewalk lines, or on any portion of the roadway distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing. Refer to CVC 275.

Guidance:
21 In general, crosswalks should not be marked at intersections unless they are intended to channelize pedestrians. Emphasis is placed on the use of marked crosswalks as a channelization device. 22 The following factors may be considered in determining whether a marked crosswalk should be used:

A. Vehicular approach speeds from both directions.

B. Vehicular volume and density.

C. Vehicular turning movements.

D. Pedestrian volumes.

E. Roadway width.

F. Day and night visibility by both pedestrians and road users.

G. Channelization is desirable to clarify pedestrian routes for sighted or sight impaired pedestrians.

H. Discouragement of pedestrian use of undesirable routes.

I. Consistency with markings at adjacent intersections or within the same intersection.

Option:
23 Crosswalk markings may be established between intersections (mid-block) in accordance with CVC 21106(a).

Guidance:
24 Mid-block pedestrian crossings are generally unexpected by the motorist and should be discouraged unless, in the opinion of the engineer, there is strong justification in favor of such installation. Particular attention should be given to roadways with two or more traffic lanes in one direction as a pedestrian may be hidden from view by a vehicle yielding the right-of-way to a pedestrian.

Option:
25 When diagonal or longitudinal lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the transverse crosswalk lines may be omitted.

Standard:
26 However, when the factor that determined the need to mark a crosswalk is the clarification of pedestrian routes for sight-impaired pedestrians, the transverse crosswalk lines shall be marked.

Option:
27 At controlled approaches, limit lines (stop lines) help to define pedestrian paths and are therefore a factor the engineer may consider in deciding whether or not to mark the crosswalk. 28 Where it is desirable to remove a marked crosswalk, the removal may be accomplished by repaving or surface treatment.

Guidance:
29 A marked crosswalk should not be eliminated by allowing it to fade out or be worn away.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 46, Packet Page 250 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
40 Support:
30 The worn or faded crosswalk retains its prominent appearance to the pedestrian at the curb, but is less visible to the approaching road user.

Standard:
31 Notification to the public shall be given at least 30 days prior to the scheduled removal of an existing marked crosswalk. The notice of proposed removal shall inform the public how to provide input related to the scheduled removal and shall be posted at the crosswalk identified for removal.

Refer to CVC 21950.5
Option:
32 Signs may be installed at or adjacent to an intersection directing that pedestrians shall not cross in a crosswalk indicated at the intersection in accordance with CVC 21106(b). 33 White PED XING pavement markings may be placed in each approach lane to a marked crosswalk, except at intersections controlled by traffic signals or STOP or YIELD signs.

Chapter 3C: Roundabout Markings
Section 3C. 05 Crosswalk Markings at Roundabouts
Standard:
01 Pedestrian crosswalks shall not be marked to or from the central island of roundabouts.

Guidance:
02 If pedestrian facilities are provided, crosswalks (see Section 3B.18) should be marked across roundabout entrances and exits to indicate where pedestrians are intended to cross. 03 Crosswalks should be a minimum of 20 feet from the edge of the circulatory roadway.

Support:
04 Various arrangements of crosswalks at roundabouts are illustrated in the figures in this Chapter.

CHAPTER 3G. COLORED PAVEMENTS
Section 3G.01 General
Support:
01 Colored pavements consist of differently colored road paving materials, such as colored asphalt or concrete, or paint or other marking materials applied to the surface of a road or island to simulate a colored pavement.
02 If non-retroreflective colored pavement, including bricks and other types of patterned surfaces, is used as a purely aesthetic treatment and is not intended to communicate a regulatory, warning, or guidance message to road users, the colored pavement is not considered to be a traffic control device, even if it is located between the lines of a crosswalk.

Standard:
03 If colored pavement is used within the traveled way, on flush or raised islands, or on shoulders to regulate, warn, or guide traffic or if retroreflective colored pavement is used, the colored pavement is considered to be a traffic control device and shall be limited to the following colors and applications:

A. Yellow pavement color shall be used only for flush or raised median islands separating traffic flows in opposite directions or for left-hand shoulders of roadways of divided highways or one-way streets or ramps.

B. White pavement color shall be used for flush or raised channelizing islands where traffic passes on both sides in the same general direction or for right-hand shoulders. 04 Colored pavements shall not be used as a traffic control device, unless the device is applicable at all times.

Guidance:

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 47, Packet Page 251 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
41 05 Colored pavements used as traffic control devices should be used only where they contrast significantly with adjoining paved areas.
06 Colored pavement located between crosswalk lines should not use colors or patterns that degrade the contrast of white crosswalk lines, or that might be mistaken by road users as a traffic control application.

CHAPTER 4D. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL FEATURES
Section 4D. 01 General
Standard:
05 A traffic control signal shall control traffic only at the intersection or midblock location where the signal faces are placed.
06 Midblock crosswalks shall not be signalized if they are located within 300 feet from the nearest traffic control signal, unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic.

Guidance:
07 A midblock crosswalk location should not be controlled by a traffic control signal if the crosswalk is located within 100 feet from side streets or driveways that are controlled by STOP signs or YIELD signs. 08 Engineering judgment should be used to determine the proper phasing and timing for a traffic control signal. Since traffic flows and patterns change, phasing and timing should be reevaluated regularly and updated if needed.
09 Traffic control signals within 1/2 mile of one another along a major route or in a network of intersecting major routes should be coordinated, preferably with interconnected controller units. Where traffic control signals that are within 1/2 mile of one another along a major route have a jurisdictional boundary or a boundary between different signal systems between them, coordination across the boundary should be considered.

Support:
10 Signal coordination need not be maintained between control sections that operate on different cycle lengths.
11 For coordination with grade crossing signals and movable bridge signals, see Sections 4D.27, 4J.03, 8C.09, and 8C.10
PART 7 TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR SCHOOL AREAS
CHAPTER 7C. MARKINGS
Section 7C. 02 Crosswalk Markings
Standard:
00a When transverse crosswalk lines are used, they shall be solid white or yellow, marking both edges of the crosswalk, except as noted in the Option. Refer to CVC 21368. They shall be not less than 12 inches nor greater than 24 inches in width.

Guidance:
00b If transverse crosswalk lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the gap between the lines should not be less than 6 feet. If diagonal or longitudinal lines are used without transverse lines to mark a crosswalk, the crosswalk width should not be less than 6 feet.
00c Crosswalk lines on both sides of the crosswalk should extend across the full width of pavement or to the edge of the intersecting crosswalk to discourage diagonal walking between crosswalks. 01 Crosswalks should be marked at all intersections on established routes to a school where there is substantial conflict between motorists, bicyclists, and student movements; where students are encouraged to cross between intersections; where students would not otherwise recognize the proper place to cross; or where motorists or bicyclists might not expect students to cross (see Figure 7A-1).

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 48, Packet Page 252 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
42 02 Crosswalk lines should not be used indiscriminately. An engineering study considering the factors described in Section 3B.18 should be performed before a marked crosswalk is installed at a location away from a traffic control signal or an approach controlled by a STOP or YIELD sign. 03 Because non-intersection school crossings are generally unexpected by the road user, warning signs (see Sections 7B.11 and 7B.12) should be installed for all marked school crosswalks at non-intersection locations. Adequate visibility of students by approaching motorists and of approaching motorists by students should be provided by parking prohibitions or other appropriate measures.

Support:
04 Section 3B.18 contains provisions regarding the placement and design of crosswalks, and Section 3B.16 contains provisions regarding the placement and design of the stop lines and yield lines that are associated with them. Provisions regarding the curb markings that can be used to establish parking regulations on the approaches to crosswalks are contained in Section 3B.23.

Support:
05 Examples of school area signing, markings, flashing beacons and overhead school signs are shown in Figures 7B-1(CA), 7B-5(CA), 7B-4 through 7B-6 and Figures 7B-101(CA) through 7B-104(CA). 06 Refer to CVC 21368 for crosswalks near schools.

Standard:
07 Whenever a marked pedestrian crosswalk has been established in a roadway contiguous to a school building or school grounds, it shall be yellow. If any one of the crosswalks is required to be yellow at an intersection, then all other marked pedestrian crosswalks at that intersection shall also be yellow. Refer to CVC 21368.

Option:
08 A marked pedestrian crosswalk may be yellow if the nearest point of the crosswalk is not more than 600 feet from a school building or school grounds. Refer to CVC 21368. 09 A marked pedestrian crosswalk may be yellow if the nearest point of the crosswalk is not more than 2800 feet from a school building or school grounds and there are no intervening crosswalks other than those contiguous to the school grounds, and it appears that the facts and circumstances require special marking for the protection and safety of persons attending the school. Refer to CVC 21368.

Guidance:
10 Diagonal or longitudinal markings should be used when a crosswalk is marked at an uncontrolled crossing location. The diagonal or longitudinal lines should be 12 to 24 inches wide and spaced 12 to 60 inches apart. The spacing design should avoid the wheel paths.

Option:
11 For added visibility, the area of a crosswalk may be marked with white or yellow diagonal lines at a 45- degree angle to the line of the crosswalk or with white or yellow longitudinal lines parallel to traffic flow.

Refer to CVC 21368. When diagonal or longitudinal lines are used to mark a crosswalk, the transverse crosswalk lines may be omitted.

Section 7C. 03 Pavement Word, Symbol, and Arrow Markings Standard:
06 The SLOW SCHOOL XING marking shall be used in accordance with the provisions of CVC 21368 in advance of all yellow school crosswalks (see Figure 7C-101(CA)). They shall not be used where the crossing is controlled by stop signs, traffic signals, or yield signs. They shall be yellow, with the word XING at least 100 feet in advance of the school crosswalk.

Option:
07 The SCHOOL XING marking and crosswalks may be used at remote locations outside of the school zone.

Support:
08 Remote crosswalk locations are locations near schools, which are not included in CVC 21368 criteria.

Also refer to Section 7C.03.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 49, Packet Page 253 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
43 Standard:
09 If the SCHOOL XING marking and crosswalks are used at remote locations outside of the school zone, they shall not be yellow (Refer to CVC 21368), but white.

Guidance:
10 The SCHOOL XING marking should be used in advance of all white school crosswalks.

Option:
11 The SCHOOL marking may be used with the School Assemblies A(CA) or C(CA), except at locations where SLOW SCHOOL XING markings are required.

Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board or Board) issues its final rule that provides minimum guidelines for the accessibility of pedestrian facilities in the public right- of-way. These guidelines, once adopted, would ensure that facilities used by pedestrians, such as sidewalks and crosswalks, constructed or altered in the public right-of-way by Federal, state, and local Governments are readily accessible to and usable by pedestrians with disabilities. When the guidelines are adopted, with or without modifications, as accessibility standards in regulations issued by other Federal agencies implementing the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act, compliance with those enforceable accessibility standards is mandatory.

DATES: The final rule is effective September 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Scott Windley, Office of Technical and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 1331 F Street NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004–1111.

Telephone (202) 272–0025 (voice) or (202) 272–0028 (TTY). Email address [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Executive Summary
The U.S. Access Board issues its final rule for accessibility guidelines for pedestrian facilities in public rights-of- way (PROWAG or guidelines). These guidelines are issued under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (ABA). Title II of the ADA applies to State and local government facilities, among others.

The ABA applies to facilities constructed or altered by or on behalf of the Federal Government, facilities leased by Federal agencies, and some facilities built with Federal funds. The purpose of these guidelines is to ensure that pedestrian facilities located in the public right-of-way are readily accessible to and usable by pedestrians with disabilities. Despite on-going efforts to improve access, pedestrians with disabilities throughout the United States continue to face major challenges in public rights-of-way because many sidewalks, crosswalks, and other pedestrian facilities are inaccessible. Equal access to pedestrian facilities is of particular importance because pedestrian travel is the principal means of independent transportation for many persons with disabilities.

Key accessible features of pedestrian facilities specified in these guidelines include:

Pedestrian Access Routes: Sidewalks, shared use paths and other pedestrian circulation paths must contain a ‘‘pedestrian access route,’’ which is required to be accessible to and traversable by individuals with disabilities. The portions of these sidewalks and paths that comprise the pedestrian access route Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 50, Packet Page 254 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
44 must be wide enough to minimize the possibility of a pedestrian using a mobility device falling into a roadway when passed by another pedestrian. Pedestrian access routes have specified cross slopes and running slopes so that they are traversable by pedestrians using manual wheelchairs or other mobility aids without exhaustive effort. Surfaces of paths in the pedestrian access route must be firm, stable, and slip resistant, without large openings or abrupt changes in level. Objects may not hazardously protrude onto sidewalks, shared use paths, or other pedestrian circulation paths.

Alternate Pedestrian Access Routes: When an entity closes a pedestrian access route for construction, it must provide a temporary alternate pedestrian access route with basic accessible features. Alternate pedestrian access routes ensure that construction in the public right-of-way does not prevent pedestrians with disabilities from reaching their destinations.

Accessible Pedestrian Signals: All new and altered pedestrian signal heads installed at crosswalks must include ‘‘accessible pedestrian signals’’ (APS), which have audible and vibrotactile features indicating the walk interval so that a pedestrian who is blind or has low vision will know when to cross the street.

Pedestrian push buttons must be located within a reach range such that a person seated in a wheelchair can reach them. The walk speed used to calculate the crossing time allows pedestrians with disabilities sufficient time to cross.

Crosswalks: Curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces are required where a pedestrian circulation path meets a vehicular way. Crosswalks at multilane roundabouts and channelized turn lanes must have additional treatments that alert motorists to the presence of pedestrians or slow or stop traffic at those crosswalks.

Transit Stops: Boarding and alighting areas at sidewalk or street level, as well as elevated boarding platforms, must be sized and situated such that a person with a disability can board and alight buses and rail cars. Pedestrian access routes must connect boarding and alighting areas and boarding platforms to other pedestrian facilities. Transit shelters must have clear space for use by a person in a wheelchair.

On-Street Parking: On-street non-residential parking must have designated accessible parking spaces sized so that a person with a disability may exit a parked vehicle and maneuver to the sidewalk without entering a vehicular way. Standard size designated accessible on-street parking spaces must be situated near an existing crosswalk with curb ramps.

These minimum guidelines will become enforceable once they are adopted, with or without modifications, as mandatory standards under the ADA by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), or the four Federal agencies that set standards for the Federal Government under the Architectural Barriers Act—the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), General Services Administration (GSA), U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)).

II. Legal Authority and Need for Rulemaking
These guidelines are issued pursuant to the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act, which provide statutory authority for the Access Board to issue minimum accessibility guidelines to ensure that transportation facilities are usable by persons with disabilities. See 29 U.S.C. 792(b)(3)(B), 42 U.S.C. 12204. These guidelines serve as the minimum requirements for enforceable standards issued by other agencies pursuant to their responsibilities under the ADA and the ABA. 29 U.S.C. 792(b)(3)(B); 42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq., 12134(c), 12149(b).

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 51, Packet Page 255 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
45 As described in the Rulemaking History section below, these final guidelines have been long awaited, particularly by state and local governments subject to Title II of the ADA. Both the Access Board’s 2004 Americans with Disabilities Act and Architectural Barriers Act Accessibility Guidelines (2004 ADAAG/ABAAG), and the Board’s initial 1991 Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, were developed primarily for buildings and facilities on sites. 36 CFR part 1191; 56 FR 35408 (July 26, 1991). While some of the requirements can be readily applied to pedestrian facilities in the public rightof-way, others need substantial modification, and many issues specific to public rights-of-way were simply not addressed. Further, the magnitude of existing physical constraints in public rights-of-way poses unique considerations that are not present in the context of buildings and sites.

In the absence of final technical requirements for accessibility of pedestrian facilities, state and local governments have been left to determine on their own how to comply with the ADA’s existing mandate to make public pedestrian transportation facilities accessible. The lack of final Federal standards has contributed to uncertainty about the relevant standards, which has resulted in courts determining technical requirements for accessibility, in some cases applying requirements for buildings and sites to public rights-of- way, although public rights-of-way are, for the most part, not specifically addressed by these standards (see e.g., Kirola v. City & Cty. of S.F., 860 F.3d 1164 (9th Cir. 2017) (finding that ADAAG applies to public rights-of- way); Fortyune v. City of Lomita, 766 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2014) (applying the 2010 ADA Standards to diagonal
See 29 U.S.C. 792(b)(3)(B); 42 U.S.C.4151 et seq.

R203 Pedestrian Access Routes This section contains scoping requirements that explain where pedestrian access routes are required, and scoping requirements that point to the technical requirements in Chapters 3 and 4 applicable to each component of pedestrian access routes.

Pedestrian access routes are a portion of the traversable pedestrian facilities in a public right-of-way that must comply with the accessibility requirements in these guidelines. In new construction, there will be a continuous network of pedestrian access routes that connect all accessible elements, spaces, and pedestrian facilities (R203.2). In alterations, a continuous network of pedestrian access routes will be established piece-by-piece as pedestrian facilities are altered and brought into compliance with PROWAG. A pedestrian access route exists within or is connected by each newly constructed or altered traversable pedestrian facility: pedestrian circulation paths (including shared use paths) (R203.3); crosswalks (R203.4); pedestrian at-grade rail crossings (R203.5); curb ramps and blended transitions (R203.6); pedestrian overpasses and underpasses (R203.7); ramps (R203.8); elevators and limited use/limited application elevators (R203.9); platform lifts (R203.10); and doors and gates (R203.11).10 Again, the goal, over time, is a continuous accessible pathway through all traversable facilities in the public right- of-way. The structure of section R203 Pedestrian Access Routes in the final rule has been revised from the proposed section R204 of the NPRM (as modified by the SNPRM). First, with edits to R203.1 General, the Board has clarified that the facilities listed in R203 either ‘‘contain’’ or ‘‘connect’’ a pedestrian access route. In the years since the NPRM was published, Access Board technical staff have received inquiries related to whether each piece of sidewalk or pedestrian facility is expected to be part of a pedestrian access route, or whether, for example, a pedestrian access route could be provided on one side of the street and not the other. This confusion stems from a requirement in the 2004 ABA and ADA Accessibility Guidelines that at least one accessible route connect buildings, sites, elements, and spaces, but does not require that each route between these locations be accessible. See 36 CFR part 1191, App. A, Ch. 2,206.2.2. The public right-of-way in this aspect is not analogous to buildings and sites.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 52, Packet Page 256 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
46 Every new or altered pedestrian facility must be made accessible. Thus, the Access Board clarifies that the requirements for pedestrian access routes are applicable to every newly constructed or altered pedestrian circulation path, crosswalk, pedestrian at-grade rail crossing, and pedestrian overpass and underpass, and the curb ramps, ramps, elevators, platform lifts, and doors and gates that connect pedestrian facilities with pedestrian access routes must also comply with the accessibility requirements of PROWAG. Second, the Board has moved the scoping for crosswalks (referred to as pedestrian street crossings in the proposed rule at NPRM R206) and the scoping for curb ramps and blended transitions (NPRM R207) into the final rule’s scoping section for pedestrian access routes at R203. The Board made this change to further clarify that crosswalks, curb ramps, and blended transitions are pedestrian facilities that comprise part of the continuous network of pedestrian access routes present in the public right-of-way. Third, in response to numerous technical assistance inquiries over the years since the NPRM was published, in the final rule the Board has added detailed scoping as to the required placement of curb ramps. The scoping clarifies when curb ramps are required at intersection crosswalks, midblock and roundabout crosswalks, on-street parking, and passenger loading zones. It further clarifies that when alterations are made to crosswalks, missing curb ramps must be added as part of the alteration. This added scoping is discussed in greater detail below.

Pedestrian Circulation Paths (R203.3)
In response to the proposed rule (NPRM 204.2), some commenters requested that the Access Board explicitly require that jurisdictions provide sidewalks, while others requested that the Board clarify that the PROWAG rule does not require sidewalks. The final rule requires that pedestrian access routes connect accessible elements, spaces, and pedestrian facilities (R203.2). A pedestrian access route is comprised primarily of conforming portions of a pedestrian circulation path, which are defined as ‘‘a prepared exterior or interior surface provided for pedestrian use in the public right-of-way’’ (R104.3). It does not matter under the rule whether the pedestrian access route runs through a sidewalk, shared use path, shoulder intended for pedestrian use, or other type of prepared surface, as long as it meets the technical requirements for pedestrian access routes. Jurisdictions may meet the requirements of PROWAG using any of the available options.

In the final rule the Board has revised this provision to indicate that transitional segments, as defined in R104.3, may be used to connect new or altered pedestrian access routes to existing pedestrian circulation paths. Transitional segments appeared in the proposed rule at NPRM R202.3.2.

Crosswalks (R203.4)
As noted above, in the final rule, the Board has relocated the scoping for crosswalks to the scoping section for pedestrian access routes to reinforce that crosswalks have a pedestrian access route within them and are part of the continuous network of accessible pedestrian facilities required through public rights-of-way. In addition, the Board has substituted the MUTCD- defined term ‘‘crosswalk,’’ with minor revisions to the MUTCD definition, for the term ‘‘pedestrian street crossing’’ that was used in the proposed rule (NPRM R204.3). In doing so the Board clarifies that there is no distinction between the places the Access Board expects pedestrian crossings to occur and the industry understanding of the places where crosswalks are located. The main impact of the use of the MUTCD-defined term ‘‘crosswalk’’ in place of ‘‘pedestrian street crossing’’ is to further clarify the places where curb ramps are required. This is detailed below in the discussion of R203.6.

Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
R306 Crosswalks
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 53, Packet Page 257 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
47 R306.1 General
Crosswalks shall comply with R306.

R306.2 Pedestrian Signal Phase Timing
Where a traffic control signal with pedestrian signal indications is provided at a crosswalk, pedestrian signal phase timing shall be based on a pedestrian clearance time that is calculated using a pedestrian walking speed of 3.5 ft/s (1.1 m/s) or less from the location of the pedestrian push button to a pedestrian refuge island or the far side of the traveled way. The walk interval shall be 7 seconds minimum. Where the pedestrian clearance time is calculated to a pedestrian refuge island, an additional pedestrian push button or passive detection device shall be provided on the pedestrian refuge island.

EXCEPTION: If a passive pedestrian detection device is used to automatically adjust the pedestrian clearance time based on the pedestrian’s actual clearance of the crosswalk, a faster walking speed may be used.

R306.3 Accessible Walk Indication
An accessible walk indication complying with R308.2 shall have the same duration as the walk interval.

EXCEPTION: Where the pedestrian signal rests in walk, the accessible walk indication may be limited to the first 7 seconds of the walk interval. If the pedestrian signal is resting in walk and there is sufficient time remaining to provide an accessible walk interval before the beginning of the pedestrian change interval, the accessible walk indication may be recalled by a button press.

R306.4 Roundabouts
Where pedestrian circulation paths are provided at roundabouts, they shall comply with R306.4.

R306.4.1 Edge Detection
The street side edge of the pedestrian circulation path at the approach and along the circulatory roadway of the roundabout shall comply with R306.4.1.1 where not attached to the curb, or R306.4.1.2 where attached to the curb. Detectable warning surfaces shall not be used for roundabout edge detection.

R306.4.1.1 Separation
Where pedestrian crossing is not intended, the pedestrian circulation path shall be separated from the curb, crosswalk to crosswalk, with landscaping or other nonprepared surface 24 inches (610 mm) wide minimum.

R306.4.1.2 Vertical Edge Treatment
Where pedestrian crossing is not intended, a curb-attached pedestrian circulation path shall have a continuous and detectable vertical edge treatment along the street side of the pedestrian circulation path, from crosswalk to crosswalk. The bottom edge of the vertical edge treatment shall be 15 inches (380 mm) maximum above the pedestrian circulation path.

R306.4.2 Crosswalk Treatments
Each multi-lane segment of the roundabout containing a crosswalk shall provide a crosswalk treatment consisting of one or more of the following: a traffic control signal with a pedestrian signal head; a pedestrian hybrid beacon; a pedestrian actuated rectangular rapid flashing beacon; or a raised crossing.

R306.5 Channelized Turn Lanes
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 54, Packet Page 258 Crosswalk Policy
City of Monterey, CA
48 Crosswalks at multi-lane channelized turn lanes shall provide treatments consisting of one or more of the following: a traffic control signal with a pedestrian signal head; a pedestrian hybrid beacon; a pedestrian actuated rectangular rapid flashing beacon; or a raised crossing.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 55, Packet Page 259 Crossing Evaluation Process for Existing and Proposed Marked Crosswalks Begin Evaluation
Uncontrolled
Approach Type Controlled
Crossing is located
greater than 300 feet,
or 150 feet in
Downtown2, from the
nearest marked
crosswalk crossing the
same roadway?
No Review both
crossings
Choose one crossing to
remain and one to remove
if both meet criteria.3
Yes
Crossing is located within 200
feet of a major pedestrian
generator1
No
Collect a minimum of 8 hours of vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian (schoolaged children shall be specifically denoted*) count data between 6am and 8pm. The following thresholds are recommended to be met:
 20 ped/hr for any 1 hr, or
 18 ped/hr for any 2 hr, or
 15 ped/hr for any 3 hr
*School-aged children count as 2 pedestrians
Yes
Adequate sight
distance?
Remain
No
Feasible to improve
sight distance or
lower prevailing
speeds?
Yes
No
Yes
Threshold Not Met
Remove
Threshold Met
Crossing is located within 200
feet of a major pedestrian
generator1
Yes
No
Notes:

1. School, library, park, community center, transit center, hospital, major retail, senior housing

2. Refer to Downtown Specific Plan extents of Downtown Planning Area.

3. For uncontrolled crossings, only stripe one crossing per intersection.

4. Refer to FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations.

5. Crossings may be added or removed based on City Engineer’s, or their designee’s, discretion, superseding this flowchart.

6. Staff may review 3 years collision data for trends as part of the improvement selection process See Flowchart
C for removal
See Flowchart
B
See Flowchart
C for removal
See Flowchart
C for removal
Existing
Existing or
Proposed?
Do not mark Proposed
See Flowchart
C for removal Existing
Existing or
Proposed?
Proposed Do not mark
See Flowchart
B to review if
improvements
are necessary
Stop
Signal or stop?
Signal Mark as standard
crosswalk
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 56, Packet Page 260 Guidelines for reviewing if any improvements are required at a pedestrian crossing after Flowchart A criteria is satisfied Curb ramps and
sidewalk?1 No Improvements feasible? No
Yes
Yes
Yes
City-standard highvisibility crosswalk
striping?2
No
Implement
improvements
Flowchart A
criteria is
satisfied
Yes
No Do not use this
flowchart
Needs additional
enhanced
improvements?4
Yes
No Keep
(Re)construct
ramps and/or
sidewalk
(Re)stripe
crosswalk3
Yes
Compliant with AB
413 or any
applicable City of
Monterey Code?
No Remove parking
Notes:

1. The City has adopted an ADA Transition Plan with prioritization criteria for ramp improvements. A marked crosswalk at a noncompliant ramp can remain, if ADA improvements are planned.

2. See City of Monterey Standard Detail 421 – Crosswalk.

3. For uncontrolled crossings, only stripe one crossing per intersection.

4. See Move Monterey Figure 3.2 and/or FHWA’s Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations Table 1.

5. Crossings may be added or removed based on City Engineer’s, or their designee’s, discretion, superseding this flowchart.

See Flowchart
C for removal Existing
Existing or
Proposed?
Proposed Do not mark
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 57, Packet Page 261 Guidelines for removal of existing crossings
Keep crossing and/or
make improvements
Provide public
notice of removal
for at least 30 days
Removal
confirmed? No
Yes
 Remove crosswalk markings
 Consider pedestrian
barricade
 Consider sign directing
pedestrians to nearest
marked crosswalk
Removal of Existing Crossings
Hold Public Meeting
See Flowchart B
for
improvements
review
Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 58, Packet Page 262 Guidelines for curb ramps at t-intersections
Are there sidewalks or
pedestrian facilities on the other
side of the t-intersection?
No
T-Intersection Curb Ramp
Hold Public Meeting
Yes
Are there multiple tintersections in close
proximity?1
Yes
Consolidate crossings by
creating one joint crossing or
placing two crossings at the far
ends of the offset intersection.

No
Are there R/W design
constraints or safety
concerns?
No
Is there high pedestrian
activity on all corners of the
intersection?
No
Build one crossing
across the major
road2
Yes
Build crossings on
all legs of tintersection
Yes
Is there another
preferable crossing
within a reasonable
distance?
Yes
No crossing needed
for the through
street
No
Can a compliant crossing be
reasonably accommodated? Yes
Build one crossing
across the major
road2
No
No crossing needed
for the through
street
Notes:

1. Close proximity is approximately less than 300 feet, or 150 feet in Downtown, from the nearest location on the same roadway.2. Select crossing based on R/W constraints, obstructions, technical feasibility, pedestrian desire paths and pedestrian travel distance.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 59, Packet Page 263 Council
Agenda Report
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Prepared by: Brian Edwards, Library & Museums Director
SUBJECT: Proclamation Apologizing to the Esselen and Rumsien First Peoples in Monterey and Acknowledgement of Historic Injustices (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council issues a proclamation apologizing to the Esselen and Rumsien Ohlone of the Monterey
Peninsula as the First Peoples of the area and recognize their continued presence and contributions before, during, and after colonization.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Preserve, promote, and maintain our City’s historic and cultural resources through responsible stewardship and
historic preservation that highlights the contributions and perspectives of all people who are a part of Monterey’s diverse history.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey apologizes to the Rumsien and
Esselen Ohlone communities of the Monterey Peninsula as the First Peoples, and celebrates their culture,
accomplishments, and contributions to the Monterey
Peninsula. The City recognizes that the Rumsien and
Esselen communities have lived here since pre-Colonial
times and continue to live and contribute to Monterey.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications in connection to supporting this action.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City of Monterey apologizes to
the Esselen and Rumsien Ohlone
as the First Peoples of the Monterey
Peninsula and acknowledges their
continued presence and
contributions.
 Indigenous tribes faced historic
injustices, including displacement,
loss of land, and denial of rights,
with many policies negatively
impacting their communities until the
mid-20th century.
 The Rumsien and Esselen tribes
have not received federal
recognition, despite their longstanding presence and contributions to the region.
 Cultural preservation efforts have
helped document and maintain the
traditions and language of the
Rumsien and Esselen tribes.
 The City of Monterey recognizes its
ancestral lands as belonging to the
Rumsien and Esselen nations and
commits to celebrating their culture
and contributions.

Date: 6/3/2025
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 264 №10/24
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to make this apology, however, that is not recommended.

DISCUSSION:

Ancestral Lands of the Rumsien and Esselen Tribes
Most representations of early California portray the indigenous narrative as only existing until the arrival of Spanish colonization beginning in 1769; however, the Rumsien and Esselen tribes had lived on their ancestral lands for thousands of years, and continue to live and contribute to the Monterey Peninsula. The term Costanoan (or Coastal People) was a Spanish term to describe the First Peoples of the area. Ohlone is a term used today for the different Tribes from San Francisco through Monterey Bay regions, but was not used historically by Monterey Bay tribes; the different tribes and villages were thriving throughout these lands.

During the era of New Spain, the colonialism beginning in 1769-1770 led to the formation of the California Missions and the goal to convert indigenous populations across California. Initially, the Spanish government had planned to stay for 10 years in Alta California and to return land and resources to the indigenous populations to the Rumsien and Esselen tribes. This land transfer did not ever take place, and by 1821 Mexico won independence from Spain and took over Alta California, along with claiming all lands taken from the First Peoples.

Indigenous Displacement: Treaties, Laws, and Land Grants Beginning in 1821, lands that had been previously recognized for Indigenous families were deeded as “ranchos” to large land grants across California for Mexican and Californio families.

These land grants, or Diseños, used naturally occurring boundaries of rivers, mountains, trees, or other natural markers to signify land ownership.

In 1848, the United States and Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ceding land to the United States, setting the new boundary and extended property and civil rights of Mexican nationals in California. The United States Congress passed the Land Act in 1851 creating the Board of Land Commissioners which set out to review Mexican land grants and survey these Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 265 №10/24
maps. At the height of the Gold Rush the United States government authorized a special commission to negotiate treaties with Indigenous Tribes across the state to cede their lands to the United States in exchange for compensation and 7.5 million acres of reservation land.

However, these treaties by the United States Government were unratified by the United States Senate and placed in an injunction of secrecy through 1905, leaving native land titles and tribes unrecognized. Many of the Mexican land grants, or Diseños, were not ratified due to language interpretation and lengthy legal processes. Lands were then claimed by the United States government as public lands. The State commission to negotiate treaties did not negotiate with the Central Coast leading to further issues related to land ownership and tribal recognition.

Although the 1849 California State Constitutional Convention has been looked at as progressive in the addition of women’s rights to property and excluding slavery from the State of California; it purposely excluded indigenous populations from citizenship or the right to vote. This differed from the Mexican rule in Alta California which allowed indigenous populations to vote. In 1850 the California State Act for the Government and Protection of Indians removed the legal rights for California Indians to represent themselves or be witnesses at court, be arrested for vagrancy, and allowed any white person to pay the bond for any incarcerated indigenous person and in return be compelled to indentured labor. Originally titled An Act for the Relative to the Protection, Punishment, and Government of Indians, this California State Act further removed the rights of Indigenous families and facilitated removal from their homelands by allowing any white person to contact a Justice of the Peace to obtain Indian children for indenture, or to remove and Indians from land in a white person’s possession. The historic jail records of the Old Monterey Jail holds records of indigenous men being bonded for labor. The California State Act for the Government and Protection of Indians was not fully repealed until 1937.

On June 2, 1924 United States Congress enacted the Indian Citizenship Act, which finally allowed First Peoples the right to vote and to be citizens in the lands that they had occupied for thousands of years. Prior to this, many indigenous populations identified publicly as Mexican to be allowed to vote. The Indian Citizenship Act allowed indigenous populations to be United States citizens without denying their tribal citizenship or connection. In Monterey, the Esselen and Rumsien families continued to live and contribute to their communities.

To date, the Rumsien and Esselen Tribes have not received Federal recognition as a tribe, and there are no Ohlone Tribes throughout the San Francisco to Monterey Bay who have received Federal recognition. The Bureau of Indian Affairs through the Office of Federal Acknowledgment (OFA). Federal and State policies and laws of “Termination” during the 1950’s further led to loss of lands, acknowledgments, and rights. The descendants of the Rumsien and Esselen Tribes have had continued presence in Monterey.

Documenting Indigenous Culture Through Change
These villages of indigenous families continued to live in Monterey and contribute to the complex history of our city. One of the culture bearers, Isabel Meadows (1846-1939), traced her Ohlone heritage to the village of Ensen and shared the stories of the Rumsien and Esselen families at Mission San Carlos. In 1932, Meadows met linguist and ethnographer John P.

Harrington and spent the remainder of her years living in Washington D.C.; during this time she Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 266 №10/24
shared oral histories, Rumsien culture and traditions, family relationships, and Rumsien language. From these records and recordings tribal scholars have continued to piece together precious cultural knowledge. The work of Harrington for the American Bureau of Ethnology was later contributed to the Smithsonian Institute.

One of the communities that has been impacted by the historic land lived on what was once the 600 block of Dutra Street, but since 1959 have called El Cuartel, or the Monterey Police & Fire Public Safety Complex. In 1835 the Diseño land grant from the Mexican government located by the Hartnell Gulch and South Gulch was owned by Gualterio (Walter) Duckworth. By 1884, the property had been divided during the American period of land ownership and the public safety complex property was largely owned by the Boronda family, with several families living on the site. By 1913, the single land parcel was split into 14 parcels with multiple working class families working at this site in industries such as landscaping and fishing industries. In 1939 the City of Monterey adopted the Emerson Knight City Master Plan and identified this parcel, along with several others, for acquisition to develop as a downtown city complex. At the time, the Monterey Police Department operated out of the first floor (now Planning Office) of Colton Hall.

In 1956, Monterey Voters approved Measure A, and allocated $350,000 in bonds towards acquiring property and building the new public safety complex. Multiple Ohlone families lived on this block of Dutra Street in a communal village, and continued the traditions of the First Peoples. 1956 the Old Jail which had once bonded indigenous men for labor finally closed, and by 1960 it had turned into a museum. The construction of the Monterey Police and Fire Public Safety complex at the 600 block of Dutra, Madison and Pacific Streets through eminent domain separated the communal village and compensation for parcels was not consistent. However, the descendants of Isabelle Meadows and others continued the oral traditions and cultural traditions of the indigenous community through recreating the arts and language of the First Peoples.

The Rumsien and Esselen families of Monterey continue to live and contribute to the Monterey community today in their ancestral lands, and the City of Monterey recognizes these lands as the ancestral home of the Rumsien and Esselen nations, apologizes to the Esselen and Rumsien First Peoples in Monterey, and recognizes their continued presence, participation, and contributions to the region.

Next Steps
Staff recommends the City Council issues the proclamation. If approved, the proclamation apologizing to the Esselen and Rumsien First Peoples in Monterey would be published as a fullpage advertisement in the Monterey Herald.

NR/be
Attachment: Proclamation
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 267

ATTACHMENT
Proclamation Apologizing to the
Esselen and Rumsien First Peoples in Monterey and Acknowledgement of Historic Injustices Towards Native American Populations WHEREAS, prior to the Spanish colonization beginning in 1769 the Rumsien and Esselen tribes had lived on their ancestral lands for thousands of years; WHEREAS, during the Spanish colonial period beginning in 1770 the California Missions were to “convert” indigenous populations within 10 years and return land and resources to the indigenous populations, with Rumsien and Esselen families directly affected; WHEREAS, during the Mexican period beginning in 1821, lands that had been previously recognized for Indigenous families were deeded as “ranchos” to large land grants across California for Mexican and Californio families;
WHEREAS, the United States and Mexico signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo in 1848, ceding land to the United States and identifying boundaries and extended property and civil rights of Mexican nationals in California;
WHEREAS, the 1849 California State Constitutional Convention excluded indigenous populations from citizenship or the right to vote;
WHEREAS, in 1850, the State of California’s Act for the Government and Protection of Indians removed the legal rights for California Indians to represent themselves or be witnesses at court, be arrested for vagrancy, and allowed any white person to pay the bond for any incarcerated indigenous person and in return be compelled to indentured labor; WHEREAS, the State of California’s Act for the Government and Protection of Indians removed the rights for Indigenous families and facilitated removal from their homelands by allowing any white person to contact a Justice of the Peace to obtain Indian children for indenture, or to remove and Indians from land in a white person’s possession; WHEREAS, during the Gold Rush the United States government authorized a special commission to cede land to the United States in exchange for compensation and reservation land; these 1851 to 1852 treaties by the United States Government were unratified by the United States Senate and placed in an injunction of secrecy, leaving native land titles unrecognized; WHEREAS, the Old Monterey Jail holds justice and incarceration records of indigenous men being bonded for labor;
WHEREAS, on June 2, 1924, the United States Congress enacted the Indian Citizenship Act, which finally allowed Indigenous first peoples the right to vote; WHEREAS, the California State Act for the Government and Protection of Indians was not fully repealed until 1937; Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 268

ATTACHMENT
WHEREAS, these institutional and legislative barriers led to indigenous families identifying publicly as Mexican to access the same rights as their community; WHEREAS, villages of indigenous families continued to live in Monterey and contribute to the complex history of our city;
WHEREAS, the construction of the Monterey Police and Fire departments’ Public Safety complex at Dutra, Madison and Pacific streets led to eminent domain and the removal of one of these family networks;
WHEREAS, the descendants of Isabelle Meadows continued the oral traditions and cultural traditions of the indigenous community;
WHEREAS, the village residents were dispersed after the eminent domain of the property at Dutra, Madison, and Pacific streets and whose compensation may have fallen short ; WHEREAS, the Rumsien and Esselen families of Monterey continue to live and contribute to the Monterey community today in their ancestral lands; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey recognizes the Monterey region as the ancestral home of the Rumsien and Esselen nations.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT I, Tyller Williamson Mayor of the City of Monterey, on behalf of the City Council and citizens, apologizing to the Esselen and Rumsien First Peoples in Monterey and acknowledges historic injustices towards Native American populations.

Dated: June 3, 2025 _____________________
Tyller Williamson, Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 9., Item Page 6, Packet Page 269 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Rafaela T. King, Finance Director
Prepared By: Kyle Olsen, Finance Analyst
SUBJECT: Adopt the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 Operating Budget and Adopt a Resolution for the FY 2025-26 Salary Schedules for Regular Full-Time, Regular Part-Time and Part-Time/Seasonal Employees Effective July 1, 2025 (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the fiscal year (FY) 2025-26 operating budget and a resolution to approve the
FY2025-26 salary schedule for regular full-time, regular part-time, and part-time/seasonal employees effective
July 1, 2025.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary
long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community
partnerships.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources and provide sufficient resources and support to develop,
retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This request is consistent with City Charter Section 6.3 Budget: “Based on the recommendation of the City
Manager, the City Council shall adopt a budget
estimating the revenues and expenditures for the City for the period covered.”
This also meets the requirements of California Code of
Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, and Government
Code section 20636(b)(1), which require governing
bodies of local agencies contracting with CalPERS to
adopt a publicly available pay schedule.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Agenda Report Highlights
 The FY 2025-26 budget projects
$110.2M in General Fund revenue
and $120.7M in expenditures,
resulting in a $10.5M operating
deficit.
 Departments were required to
reduce budgets by 7%, in addition
to other strategic reductions, this
achieved $4.2M in savings to help
balance the budget.
 Rising costs include 4% annual
salary increases, health insurance
premiums, and a 375% increase in
liability/property insurance since FY
2019-20.
 The Special Event Support Program
funding is discontinued, while First
Night Monterey and Rental
Assistance Program funding remain
unchanged.
 The budget adds 5.25 new
positions, including roles in Human
Resources, Information Services,
and Economic Development,
totaling $872,619 in costs.

Date: 6/3/2025
Item No.: 13.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 270 №11/24
Adopting the attached resolution will adopt $110,205,573 in revenue and $120,653,607 in expenditures in the City’s General Fund. Before taking into consideration the City’s transfer/out, City Staff projected an operating deficit of $10,458,034. City Staff intends to use projected savings from the current and next fiscal year, the City’s unassigned fund balance, and restructured financial commitments to balance the budget.

Other funds include Special Revenue Funds, Enterprise Funds, Internal Service Funds, and Agency Funds. These funds are shown in summary throughout this report and in detail in the attached Exhibit A to the budget resolution.

There are no fiscal implications to adopting the salary schedules, as current salaries are included in the adopted budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose to adopt the budget as proposed, appropriate different amounts, or choose to add/remove items from City’s budget.

DISCUSSION:

Budget Process and Balancing the Budget
Budget Process
The Finance Department launches the City’s annual budget cycle in February of each year.

Departments are asked to submit revenue and expenditure estimates while the Finance Department calculates the City’s internal service charges (including insurance premiums and equipment replacement charges), debt-service, and the City’s transfers in/out for the upcoming the fiscal year. During this time, Departments are also required to submit any new technology requests or new position requests. By the end of February, the Budget Team0F 1 is able to have a
clear view of the City’s overall fiscal positions, projected surplus/deficit, and a full view of the City’s projected needs for the upcoming year.

Beginning in March, the Budget Team hosts a series of Departmental Meetings with each department (sometimes combining smaller departments as appropriate) to discuss in detail the 1 The budget team consists of representatives from the City Manager’s Office, Human Resources Department, and Finance Department.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 2, Packet Page 271 №11/24
Department’s budget, technology, and position requests. Over the course of two to three weeks, the Budget Team conducts more than 20 hours of meetings with departments and as a Budget Team.

Balancing the Budget
For FY 2025-26, the Budget Team was able to identify early in the process that the City’s expenditure requests outpaced the City’s projected revenue. As a result, Departments were asked to identify a minimum of 7% of their Department’s budget to be reduced. Additionally, the Finance Team carefully reviewed all other expenditures for the City (Internal Service Fund projections, position costing, etc.) to ensure accurate calculations and identify areas which could reduce the burden on the General Fund. After completing this process, staff identified a more than $2.1 million in reductions within the City’s projected General Fund expenditure accounts.

Along with other staffing decisions, the City was able to identify approximately $4.2 million to be removed from the projected expenses for the City for next year. These savings, combined with projected revenue from FY 2024-25 and salary savings in FY 2025-26, restructured financial commitments, and freezing of select vacant positions are utilized to balance the City’s FY 2025- 26 budget.

Revenue
The City continues to have consistent revenues and is projecting continued consistency in the upcoming fiscal year. In terms of growth, the City is expecting a modest increase of 4% above the FY 2024-25 adopted revenue, in line with the area’s Consumer Price Index (CPI). For FY 2025-26 the City is projecting a total of $110,205,573 (4% above the FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget).

Expenditures
As indicated above, the City’s expense growth is outpacing the City’s revenue generation. For FY 2025-26, the City is projecting a total of $120,663,607 in expenses for the General Fund (11% above the FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget).

Before considering the City’s transfers in/out, the City is projecting an operating deficit of $10,458,034. This is a result of the City’s rising costs, some of which can be controlled by the City, and many of which are outside the City’s control.

Rising Costs
Salaries & Benefits
For any municipal organization, salary and benefits are one of the largest drivers of costs and the City’s budget is no exception.
 Renewed Labor Agreements: Beginning in FY 2024-25, the City entered into renewed labor agreements with each of the City’s seven labor groups. One of the focal points of the new agreements is a 4% annual pay increase through FY 2026-27. Of note, the previous labor agreements, which spanned covered FY 2022-23 and FY 2023-24, also included 4% annual wage growth. The two agreements taken together will result in 20% wage growth from FY 2022-23 to FY 2026-27.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 3, Packet Page 272 №11/24
 Market Rate Adjustments: Beginning FY 2024-25, the City implemented a salary adjustment to bring a majority of positions throughout the City to a comparative level to other, similar positions among comparator agencies. This was part of an effort to recruit and retain a high-quality workforce, in line with the City’s adopted Value Drivers.  Health Insurance and Other Benefits: Costs continue to rise for health insurance and other benefits provided to employees. The City is proud to support staff through competitive salaries and strong benefits; however, many benefits-related costs such as health insurance are outside the City’s control.
 Position Growth: Since FY 2021-22 (post-COVID) and including the proposed FY 2025- 26 budget, the City has added 59.5 full-time and regular part-time positions.

Conservatively, this accounts for approximately $6 million of the City’s FY 2025-26 budget.

Insurance Premiums
The City’s liability and worker’s compensation premiums continue to rise. Insurance premiums throughout the United States and, perhaps even more so in California have increased dramatically in the past several years.
 Liability and Property Insurance: In FY 2019-20, the total cost of all the City’s liability and property insurance premiums was $850K. The FY 2025-26 budgets projects a total cost for liability and property insurance premiums to be more than $3.2 million, a more than 375% increase. Furthermore, experts in the insurance industry do not expect the market to stabilize in the immediate future. Throughout this time, the City has not dramatically changed the type of insurance carried by the City. Additionally, for at least the next five years, the City’s Finance Department is projecting, at a minimum, further insurance cost increases of 15% to 20%.

Based on these projections, by 2030, insurance premiums for the City could total more than $5.3M. The City is exploring all possible options to mitigate against these increases, including increasing the City’s Self-Insured Retention (SIR); however, these discussions will require coordination across the City, City Council, and the City’s Joint Powers Authority (JPA).The City’s General Fund carries about 80% of the City’s insurance premium costs.
 Workers’ Compensation: In FY 2019-20, the cost of the City’s Workers’ Compensation Insurance was $395K. During the COVID-19 pandemic and the years immediately following, workers’ compensation premiums dropped slightly due to a decreased workforce. However, in the post-COVID years the number of staff has increased and in FY 2025-26 the City is projecting $511K for workers’ compensation insurance. The City’s General Fund carries about 80% of the City’s workers’ compensation insurance premium costs.

Other Challenges – Maintaining Services
Throughout the budget process, the Budget Team has had to make hard decisions in order to balance the City’s budget. The City takes great pride in providing high quality services and assistance to the citizens of Monterey and the organizations which do business in the City. The Budget Team and City staff recognizes the impact that reductions have on City services and the community. With this in mind, and to carefully balance the City’s resources, the Budget Team Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 4, Packet Page 273 №11/24
recommends continuing with City support for the First Night Monterey event and Rental Assistance Program, while discontinuing support for the City’s Special Event Support Program (SESP), also known as Community Grants. The reality is that the City must focus its efforts on its own programs and services and can no longer afford the SESP. Summary of select services are shown below:

FY 2025-26 SELECT SPECIAL BUDGET ITEMS

BUDGET ITEM
FY 2024-25
BUDGET

PROPOSED FY
2025-26
Special Event Support
Program $100,000
$ -

First Night Monterey $35,000 $35,000
Rental Assistance
Program $250,000 $250,000
Total $385,000 $285,000
SUMMARY OF THE FY 2025-26 BUDGET
Operating Budget
In total, the FY 2025-26 budget allocates $110,205,573 in revenue and $120,663,607 in expenditures in the City’s General Fund as well as $121,656,076 in revenue and $91,894,684 in expenditures in other funds. Additionally, the FY 2025-26 budget provides $24,123,281 in transfers in/out, of which, $21,900,049 is allocated to Capital Improvement Projects. Exhibit A to the budget resolution, attached to this report, provides a detailed overview of the City’s revenue, expenditures, transfers in/out, CIP projects, and the City’s position control. A summary is below and select items follow in this report.

FUND

OPERATING

REVENUE

TRANSFER IN

TOTAL TOTAL
General Fund* $110,205,573 $1,365,423 $111,570,996
Other Funds $121,565,076 $22,757,858 $144,322,934
Total $231,770,649 $24,123,281 $255,893,930
FUND

OPERATING

REVENUE

TRANSFER OUT

TOTAL TOTAL
General Fund* $120,663,605 $1,271,936 $121,935,541
Other Funds $91,894,683 $22,851,345 $114,746,028
Total $212,558,288 $24,123,281 $236,681,569

OPERATING BUDGET - REVENUE

OPERATING BUDGET - EXPENDITURES
*Includes Fund 105 - Facility Maintenance Fund
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 5, Packet Page 274 №11/24
Five-Year Projection (General Fund)
A summary of the General Fund’s Five-Year Forecast can be seen below. The forecast assumes moderate, but consistent, growth in the City’s revenues and tight control over the City’s spending.

The above forecast also includes modest salary growth starting in FY 27-28 and presumes that the City will be able to continue the savings generated in the FY 2025-26 budget. There are several other ways in which the City could accelerate efforts towards balancing the City’s budget:
 Operationalize Anticipated Savings – Each year, including FY 2025-26, the Finance Department calculates for savings that come, typically, as a result of vacant positions throughout the City. Working with departments, the City could work to eliminate positions that have been vacant for long periods of time and relieve the burden on the City’s expenses.
 Align Project Appropriations with Implementation Schedules – The City follows standard municipal practice by appropriating CIP funds over multiple years, often accumulating resources before major projects begin. This approach is fiscally sound and allows for proper project planning and full funding. However, some appropriated projects have remained inactive for extended periods beyond their planned timelines due to various factors such as permitting delays, design complications, or shifting priorities. Staff has prioritized projects and defunded/reallocated funds to the more urgent and critical projects. Currently, approximately $5 million in General Fund CIP appropriations remains unspent and unencumbered. Of the $5 million, Rule 20A and Conference Center allocations cannot be spent (approximately $1.4 million). The remaining funding will be encumbered and/or spent in FY 25/26. While multi-year accumulation of project funds is appropriate when sufficient funding sources are available, continuing improvement of the alignment between appropriation timing and realistic project implementation schedules is enhancing the City's ability to optimize cash flow and resource planning.  Review the City Purchase Order Policy – Each year, the City rolls over a certain number of purchase orders from one fiscal year to the next. A review of the policy and scrutiny of the size and types of purchase orders which are rolled from one year to the next, would mitigate the potential for funds to be needlessly tied up from the previous fiscal year. The City’s Purchasing Policy along with all other fiscal-related policies are being reviewed and revised as necessary in the upcoming months in preparation for the implementation of the ERP system.

General Fund*
FY 2025-26
Proposed
FY 2026-27
Projected
FY 2027-28
Projected
FY 2028-29
Projected
FY 2029-30
Projected
FY 2030-31
Projected
Revenue $110,205,572 $115,715,852 $121,501,645 $127,576,727 $133,955,563 $140,653,341 Expenditure ($120,663,605) ($124,975,040) ($127,401,629) ($132,327,105) ($135,743,883) ($140,830,667) Over/(Under) ($10,458,033) ($9,259,188) ($5,899,985) ($4,750,378) ($1,788,320) ($177,326) Transfer In $1,365,423 $1,405,219 $1,446,402 $1,489,021 $1,533,128 $1,578,778 Transfer Out ($1,471,936) ($615,682) ($619,041) ($621,626) ($618,437) ($614,668) Net Transfer Over/(Under) ($106,513) $789,537 $827,361 $867,395 $914,691 $964,110 Operating Surplus/(Deficit) ($10,564,546) ($8,469,651) ($5,072,624) ($3,882,983) ($873,629) $786,784 *IncludesFund 105 -FacilityMaintanenceFund
FIVE YEAR FORECAST: FY 2025-26 THROUGH FY 2030-31*
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 6, Packet Page 275 №11/24
Reserve Contributions
Consistent with the City’s reserve policies, the FY 2025-26 budget includes contributions to the City’s reserves. However, to balance the FY 2025-26 budget, the Budget Team has recommended, with the exception of Economic Uncertainty Fund, Tidelands Reserve Fund (Sea Level Rise), and Parking Reserve Fund, reducing the FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 contributions by half of the policies’ standard annual amount outlined in the City’s reserve policies. A list of contributions to the City’s reserves can be found below and additional details, including reserve history and balances, can be found in Exhibit A to the budget resolution.  Economic Uncertainty Reserve Fund: $1,415,044
 Conference Center Reserve Fund: $375,000
 Sports Center Facility Reserve Fund: $250,000
 Pension Liability Reserve Fund: $500,000
 Technology Infrastructure Reserve Fund: $584,848
 City Facilities Reserve Fund: $125,000
 Public Safety Facility and Maintenance Reserve Fund: $125,000  Library Facility and Maintenance Reserve Fund: $125,000 The City continues to contribute to two reserves outside the General Fund in the Parking Fund and Tidelands Fund:
 Parking Facilities Reserve Fund (Parking Fund): $250,000 o In addition, the City plans to reallocate $2,700,000 from unrestricted fund balance to be contributed into the reserve fund.
 Sea Level Rise Reserve Fund (Tidelands Fund): $250,000 Additionally, the City intends to utilize several of the reserves from the General Fund to support the FY 2025-26 budget:
 Conference Center Reserve Fund: $125,998
 Sports Center Facility Reserve Fund: $775,998
 Technology Infrastructure Reserve Fund: $1,169,696
 Pension Reserve Fund – OPEB payment: $1,762,565
As mentioned above, Appendix A has additional detail about the City’s reserves, including balances, uses, and a history going back to FY 2019-20.

Debt Service
The FY 2025-26 continues the City’s efforts to pay down existing debt. In total, the City will pay a total of $6,618,100 in principal and interest towards its obligations. Of note, in the FY 2025-26 budget the City will begin the process of reimbursing the Equipment Replacement Fund for the purchase of three fire trucks purchased over the past three years. Interfund payments (advances to/from) will be paid between the General Fund and the Equipment Replacement for the next seven years.

Regarding the City’s debt, the City carries a responsible level of debt that can be managed from year to year. Of note, is the pay-off date for several of the City’s largest loans: 2013 Financing Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 7, Packet Page 276 №11/24
Agreement (Sports Center Renovations) and the Conference Center Bond. Both loans will be paid off in the early 2030s. Several other loans have maturity dates ranging from 2027 to 2029.

A full list of the City’s debt payments, including pay-off dates, can be seen below and in Exhibit A to the budget resolution:
*2013 Financing Agreement is for the Monterey Sports Center.

Transfers In/Out
For the General Fund, the FY 2025-26 budget includes $1,471,936 to be transferred out and $1,365,423 will be transferred in, resulting in a net deficit of $106,513. Compared to previous fiscal years, the transfer in/out schedule is consistent from previous years; however, after a detailed review of the Parking Fund’s staffing and resources, it has been determined that a transfer from the Parking Fund to the General Fund is justified to support an additional transfer of $609K. A detailed list of transfers in/out can be seen below and the City’s full transfer schedule can be viewed in Exhibit A to the budget resolution.

Loan REPAYMENT FROM REPAYMENT TO

PAY-OFF
DATE

INITIAL LOAN
AMOUNT
FY 2025-26

PAYMENT
(PRINCIPAL
AND

INTEREST)

YEAR END

BALANCE
Fire Truck Debt Service 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 7/1/2027 $356,500 $17,825 $19,310 Fire Truck Loan #1 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 12/31/2030 705,000 $141,000 564,000 Fire Truck Loan #2 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 12/31/2032 1,719,371 $245,624 1,473,747 Fire Truck Loan #3 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 12/31/2031 980,438 $163,406 817,032 Settlement Funding 716 - Liab. and Prop. Ins. Fund 807 - Tidelands Fund 12/1/2028 2,000,000 220,000 600,000 Cemetery Columbarium 610 - Cemetery Fund 101 - General Fund 6/30/2027 879,383 100,000 159,383 INTERFUND LOAN TOTAL $6,640,692 $887,856 $3,633,471
Loan REPAYMENT FROM REPAYMENT TO

PAY-OFF
DATE

INITIAL LOAN
AMOUNT
FY 2025-26

PAYMENT
(PRINCIPAL
AND

INTEREST)

YEAR END

BALANCE
2013 Financing Agreement 310 - Debt Service Fund Capital One Public Fundng 5/1/2032 $7,170,000 $546,936 $2,860,000 2017 PG&E Financing Loan 101 - General Fund PG&E 12/1/2027 97,035 $9,704 14,555 Fire Truck Loan #1 705 - Equipment Replacement Banc of America 12/1/2029 705,000 $80,240 305,000 Fire Truck Loan #2 705 - Equipment Replacement Banc of America 12/20/2029 1,719,371 $305,709 994,620 Fire Truck Loan #3 705 - Equipment Replacement Banc of America 12/30/2029 980,438 $222,949 616,281 Conference Center Bond 918 - Conf. Center Facilties Dist. PNC Bank 12/1/2034 50,000,000 $3,678,327 22,560,452 Sewer Loan #110 279 - Sewerline Maint. Fund State Water Resources 8/30/2035 3,352,782 $215,796 1,928,302 Sewer Loan #120 279 - Sewerline Maint. Fund State Water Resources 3/12/2038 10,872,248 670,583 7,048,290 EXTERNAL LOAN TOTAL $74,896,874 $5,730,244 $36,327,500
GRAND TOTAL $81,537,566 $6,618,100 $39,960,971
FY 2025-26 INTER-FUND LOAN SUMMARY (Advance To/From Funds) FY 2025-26 EXTERNAL LOAN SUMMARY (Principal & Interest) Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 8, Packet Page 277 №11/24
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
The FY 2025-26 budget includes a total of $21,900,049 for CIP. Zero dollars from the General Fund’s Unassigned Fund Balance are allocated for the CIP; however, $850,000 funded by the Monterey Sports Center’s facility fees and Monterey Sports Center reserve fund, which are General Fund restricted funds are being allocated for the CIP. These funds support the Sports Center’s much-needed maintenance. Other projects include maintenance on the City’s wharf, improving the City’s streets, improving bike lanes, and investing in essential maintenance and repairs for the City’s facilities. A summary table for CIP is below and a detailed list of the City’s new and ongoing projects for FY 2025-26 can be viewed in Exhibit A to the budget resolution.

Additionally, it is worth noting that over the years the City has made significant contributions to CIP around the City. As of the writing of this report, the City has nearly $50 million in Use To Fund Amount
Sports Center Loan 310- Debt ServiceFund $546,936
Capital Improvement Projects* 410- CIPFund $850,000
PERSReplacement Benefits 718- EmployeeBenefits Fund $75,000 Total $1,471,936
Use From Fund Amount
DomesticViolencePosition 249- StateGrant Fund $100,000
Signal Maintenance 251- Gas TaxFund $6,000
ParkingMaintenanceand Sign Repair 625- ParkingFund $609,384 Cleaning/TrafficEngineering 625- ParkingFund $342,025
Parks/Streets MaintenanceServices 807- Tidelands Fund $258,014 Park Maintenance 821- ScholzePark MainteenanceFund$25,000 Park Maintenance 822- ScholzePark MainteenanceFund$25,000 Total $1,365,423
Net Usage Over/(Under) ($106,513)
*IncludesFund105- FacilityMaintenanceFund
FY 2025-26 General FundTransfer In
FY 2025-26 General FundTransfer Out
Fund Amount
101 - General Fund $ 850,000
251 - Gas Tax (Highway User Tax - HUTA) $ 863,942
252 - MeasureS $15,753,781
257 - MeasureX $ 1,491,547
258 - Road Maintenanceand Rehab (SB1) $ 90,779
279 - Sewer Fund $ 900,000
625 - ParkingFund $ 1,600,000
807 - Tidelands Fund $ 350,000
Total $21,900,049
FY 2025-26 CIP Project Funding
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 9, Packet Page 278 №11/24
appropriated, unspent funds dedicated to CIP. Of this amount, approximately $5 million is allocated from the General Fund and remains unspent. Since FY 2015-16 the General Fund has contributed more than $15 million to CIP.

Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) projects are allocated and appropriated outside the budget cycle by the City Council based on recommendations from the NCIP Committee. NCIP projects and funding will be brought to City Council later in the year.

Special Revenue Funds (Select)
Below is a table of select Special Revenue Funds for the City. Please note, the beginning and end fund balances include funds that have been appropriated to CIP in previous fiscal years.

Specific amounts are noted in the footnote of the table below. A detailed view of all Special Revenue Funds can be seen in Exhibit A to the budget resolution.

Enterprise Funds
Below is a table of the City’s active Enterprise Funds. Except for the Cemetery Fund, which relies on subsidies from the General Fund, the City’s enterprise funds operate at a narrow margin, when taking CIP and other uses into consideration. Please note, the beginning and end fund balances include funds that have been appropriated to CIP in previous fiscal years.

Specific amounts are noted in the footnote of the table below. A detailed view of the City’s Enterprise Funds can be seen in Exhibit A to the budget resolution.

Fund Name
7/1/2025
Beginning
Fund Balance
(estimated)
FY 2025-26
Projected
Revenue
FY 2025-26
Projected
Expenses
FY 2025-26
Allocated to
CIP Projects
Other Uses
(Net Transfer
In/Out)
6/30/2026 End
Fund Balance
(Projected)
216 - NCIP
1 $19,074,018 $6,100,581 ($387,132) TBD $ - $25,561,731 252 - Measure P&S
2 $19,261,303 $12,391,265 $ - ($15,753,781) $ - $15,898,787 650 - Presidio of Monterey
3 ($797,068) $29,766,472 ($28,891,575) $ - $ - $77,829
807 - Tidelands Fund
4 $5,365,781 $3,998,686 ($2,835,107) $350,000 ($258,014) $6,621,346 1 NCIP has approximately $19.5 committed to CIP projects from previous years. 2 Measure P&S has approximately $14.8M committed to CIP proejcts from previous years. 3A negative balance in the Presidio Fund is related to the timing of the City's annuals reports. The Army is billed on an ongoing basis and fully recovers costs.
4 Tidelands has appoximately $2.2M committed to CIP projects from previous year.

Fund Name
7/1/2025
Beginning
Unrestricted
Net Position
(estimated)
FY 2025-26
Projected
Revenue
FY 2025-26
Projected
Expenses
FY 2025-26
Allocated to
CIP Projects
Other Uses
(Net
Transfer
In/Out)
7/1/2026
Ending
Unrestricted
Net Position
(estimated)
279 - Sewer Utility Fund
1 $2,964,665 $3,810,000 ($3,316,981) ($900,000) $ - $2,557,684 600 - Marina Fund
2 $2,142,985 $4,072,860 ($2,653,630) $ - ($235,873) $3,326,342 610 - Cemetery Fund ($1,352,297) $348,200 ($788,709) $ - $ - ($1,792,806) 625 - Parking Fund
3 $8,479,029 $12,959,571 ($10,402,980) ($1,600,000) ($7,665,536) $1,770,084 1 The Sewer Utility Fund has approximately $1.7M appropriated to CIP from previous years. 2 The Marina Fund has approximately $1.4M appropriated to CIP from previous years. 3 The Parking Fund has approximaely $3.8M appropriated to CIP from previous years; Other uses includes transfers in/out, one-time transfer to the reserve fund, and the annual contribution to the reserve fund.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 10, Packet Page 279 №11/24
Internal Service Funds
Below is a table of the City’s Internal Service Funds. Internal Service Fund charges are allocated to departmental budgets based on staffing, usage, and other factors. As can be seen in the table below, several of the City’s Internal Service Funds have a negative fund balance; the City’s Finance Department is developing a plan to right size these funds over the next several fiscal years by increasing charges to departments so they outpace expenses. A detailed view of the City’s Internal Service Funds can be seen in Exhibit A to the budget resolution.

Staffing Changes
Consistent with the City’s value drivers, the City is continuously evaluating its staffing levels to ensure the City is operating as efficiently as possible and meeting the needs of Monterey’s constituents. The FY 2025-26 budget proposes the following changes be made to the City’s Position Control List (PCL) – these changes will add a total of 5.25 positions to the PCL.  Senior Craftsworker (1), Conference Center (General Fund) - ADD  Artifact Specialist (1), Library and Museums (General Fund) - ADD  Artifact Specialist RPT (.75), Library and Museums (General Fund) – REMOVE  Senior Human Resources Analyst (1), Human Resources (General Fund) – ADD (threeyear temporary position)  IT Applications Engineer (1), Information Services Division (General Fund) – ADD (three-year temporary position)
 Economic Development Manager (1), Community Development (General Fund) – ADD  Administrative Assistant (1), Public Works (Presidio of Monterey Fund) – ADD A summary of these changes and the impact on the budget is found below:

The City’s full PCL can be viewed in Exhibit B to the budget resolution.

Fund Name
7/1/2025 Beginning
Fund Balance
(estimated)
FY 2025-26
Projected Revenue
FY 2025-26
Projected
Expenses
Other Uses (Net
Transfer In/Out)
6/30/2026 End Fund
Balance (Projected)
705 - Equipment Replacement Fund $9,738,436 $3,437,324 ($3,135,921) $ - $10,039,839 708 - Vehicle Maintenance Fund ($2,263,536) $3,278,054 ($3,237,356) $ - ($2,222,838) 710 - Information Services Fund $2,521,085 $8,147,693 ($8,147,694) $ - $2,521,085 715 - Worker's Compensation Insurance Trust Fund ($3,248,042) $3,704,773 ($3,704,644) $ - ($3,247,913) 716 - Liability & Property Insurance Fund ($2,488,375) $5,305,851 ($5,305,850) $ - ($2,488,374) 718 - Employee Benefit Fund $1,436,083 $11,821,710 ($11,821,710) $75,000 $1,511,083 Department Fund Title Quantity Salary Benefits Retirement Total ConferenceCenter General Fund Senior Craftsworker 1.00 $95,880 $29,708 $12,148 $137,736 Libraryand Museums General Fund Artifact Specialist RPT (0.75) ($53,789) ($10,010) ($5,287) ($69,086) Libraryand Museums General Fund Artifact Specialist 1.00 $71,718 $29,358 $9,087 $110,163 Human Resources General Fund Senior HRAnalyst (3-year) 1.00 $130,944 $30,217 $16,591 $177,752 Information Services Division General Fund ITApplicationsEngineer (3year) 1.00 $132,000 $30,232 $16,724 $178,956 CommunityDevelopment General Fund Economic Development Mgr. 1.00 $172,104 $30,813 $21,806 $224,723 General Fund Total 4.25 $548,857 $140,318 $71,069 $760,244 Public Works* Presidio of MontereyFund AdministrativeAssistant 1.00 $73,656 $29,386 $9,332 $112,374 Presidio of Monterey Fund Total 1.00 $73,656 $29,386 $9,332 $112,374 Grand Total 5.25 $ 622,513 $ 169,704 $ 80,401 $ 872,619 FY 2025-26 Position Control List Changes Summary
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 11, Packet Page 280 №11/24
Budget Resolution Exhibits
Exhibit A – Preliminary Budget Book
The provided agenda report and presentation deliver an overview and highlight of the FY 2025- 26 budget with some history and analysis to give a brief synopsis of the financial picture for the upcoming fiscal year. The Preliminary Budget Book (Exhibit A), attached to this report, provides the details of the City’s projected revenues, expenditures, transfers in/out, debt schedule and the other important tables. This is a preliminary budget book as it contains the key information that the City Council is asked to adopt.

After the budget is adopted, the Budget Book will be finalized. The final book will have any new changes or updates provided during the council meeting, or future meetings before June 30, 2025, and will also include additional sections that include the City Manager’s Message, Department Narratives, Financial Policies, and detailed tables and graphs. The full, online budget book will be available online in mid-July.

Exhibit B – Position Control List
The attached Position Control List provides and overview of the City’s full-time and regular parttime positions. When finalized, the City’s online Budget Book will contain the full Position Control List and the historic position table.

Salary Schedule (2nd resolution)
The City Council has previously authorized the establishment of all employee classifications and salaries for regular full-time and regular part-time employees. This action does not change any of those prior approvals. California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, and Government Code section 20636(b)(1), require governing bodies of local agencies contracting with CalPERS to adopt a publicly available pay schedule. This schedule is attached as Exhibit A to the salary schedule resolution.

RTK/kro
Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution: Approving FY 2025-26 Operating Budget

2. Exhibit A: Preliminary Budget Book

3. Exhibit B: FY 2025-26 Position Control List

4. Draft Resolution: Approving FY 2025-26 Salary Schedule

5. Exhibit A: FY 2025-26 Salary Schedules
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 12, Packet Page 281 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2025-26 OPERATING BUDGET
WHEREAS, the proposed operating budget of the City of Monterey for fiscal year 2025- 26 was prepared and submitted to the City Council by the City Manager in accordance with Section 6.3 of the City Charter;
WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the proposed operating budget and thereafter agendized this item as a public appearance to inform the City Council and the public about the budget;
WHEREAS, the proposed operating budget includes changes to the position control list; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein. The City Council hereby adopts and approves of the proposed operating budget and position control list for FY 2025-26 with Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Exhibit A and Exhibit B contain the information required by Section 6.3 of the Monterey City Charter as the budget and position control list of the City of Monterey in the following amount:

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 13, Packet Page 282 A copy of said budget and position control list (Exhibit A and Exhibit B) is also on file in the office of the City Clerk.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT monies may be transferred from one account to another with the approval of the City Manager or designee except for the following transfers which may be made only with the approval of the City Council:

1. Transfer to or from Special Revenue Funds where state or federal regulations require council approval;

2. Transfers to or from Enterprise Funds;

3. Transfers from unappropriated reserves or fund balances;

4. Transfers from Library Trust Fund pursuant to Charter Section 7.1;

5. Transfer from the Museum Trust Fund pursuant to City Code section 21-4.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT sixteen percent (16%) of the total projected revenue from Transient Occupancy Taxes is hereby appropriated in the amount of $5,648,000 for use in the Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program for FY 2025-26. This amount is the total appropriation from which all applicable City administration and program expenses will be deducted as appropriate. (Charter section 6.6.) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the City Manager is hereby authorized during declared emergencies to create fund accounts and projects as necessary to accurately record the appropriations in this budget, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursement funding as applicable;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the proposed transfers included in the Interfund Transfers schedule that is part of the FY 2025-26 Proposed Operating Budget as proposed are hereby adopted and approved; and that the Finance Director is hereby authorized to make administrative budget adjustments to the schedule as deemed necessary.

FUND

OPERATING

REVENUE

TRANSFER IN

TOTAL TOTAL
General Fund* $110,205,572 $1,365,423 $111,570,995
Other Funds $121,672,952 $22,757,858 $144,430,810
Total $231,878,524 $24,123,281 $256,001,805
FUND

OPERATING

REVENUE

TRANSFER OUT

TOTAL TOTAL
General Fund* $120,663,605 $1,271,936 $121,935,541
Other Funds $91,894,683 $22,851,345 $114,746,028
Total $212,558,288 $24,123,281 $236,681,569

OPERATING BUDGET - REVENUE

OPERATING BUDGET - EXPENDITURES
*Includes Fund 105 - Facility Maintenance Fund
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 14, Packet Page 283 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 15, Packet Page 284

OPERATING BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 STARTING JULY 1

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 16, Packet Page 285

COMBINED

STATEMENTS
FY 2025-26 OPERATING BUDGET

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 17, Packet Page 286

ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION GENERAL FUNDSSPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSDEBT SERVICE FUND PERMANENT FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDSINTERNAL SERVICE FUNDSAGENCY FUNDS TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES $ 17,074,474 $ 28,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 17,102,474 - $ SALES TAX $ 16,113,000 $ 11,952,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,065,000 - $ CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST TAX $ - $ - $ 5,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,700,000 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES $ 29,687,000 $ 5,659,110 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 35,346,110 - $ BUSINESS LICENSE $ 5,300,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,300,000 UTILITY USERS TAXES $ 5,247,080 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,247,080 FRANCHISE FEES $ 2,765,500 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 2,765,500 OTHER TAXES $ 528,214 $ 76,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 604,214 LICENSES & PERMITS $ 2,328,650 $ - $ - $ - $ 856,700 $ - $ - $ 3,185,350 FINES & FORFEITURES $ 259,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,707,500 $ - $ - $ 1,966,500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 3,000,782 $ 3,431,234 $ - $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ - $ 6,462,016 INTEREST $ 2,442,144 $ 1,737,018 $ 99,903 $ 68,675 $ 502,654 $ - $ 2,098 $ 4,852,492 RENTS $ 2,690,166 $ 4,112,303 $ - $ - $ 925,000 $ - $ - $ 7,727,469 FEES & CHARGES $ 22,215,461 $ 14,956,364 $ - $ - $ 16,895,337 $ 34,960,500 $ 89,027,663 - $ OTHER REVENUES $ 554,101 $ 16,961,689 $ - $ - $ 234,761 $ 734,905 $ 2,000 $ 18,487,456 TOTAL SOURCES $ 110,205,572 $ 58,913,718 $ 5,799,903 $ 68,675 $ 21,151,952 $ 35,695,405 $ 4,098 $ 231,839,324

ACCOUNT CLASSIFICATION GENERAL FUNDSSPECIAL REVENUE FUNDSDEBT SERVICE FUND PERMANENT FUNDS ENTERPRISE FUNDSINTERNAL SERVICE FUNDSAGENCY FUNDS TOTAL SALARIES/BENEFITS $ 87,218,668 $ 11,832,851 $ - $ - $ 8,276,949 $ 5,133,264 $ 112,461,731 - $ SERVICES/SUPPLIES $ 18,231,444 $ 19,711,975 $ 4,225,263 $ - $ 5,104,407 $ 5,313,894 $ 52,587,283 300 $ SERVICES/SUPPLIES INCL INTERNAL SVC CHGS 538,250 $ $ 950,550 $ - $ - $ 619,500 $ 19,251,203 $ 8,000 $ 21,367,503 EQUIPMENT OUTLAY $ 599,001 $ 32,500 $ - $ - $ 7,500 $ 3,697,916 $ - $ 4,336,917 INTERNAL SERVICE CHARGES $ 13,877,110 $ 3,060,990 $ 30,780 $ - $ 3,153,945 $ 956,896 $ 21,079,722 - $ SERVICES/SUPPLIES HPM DIVISION $ 199,132 $ 526,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 725,132TOTAL USES $ 120,663,605 $ 36,114,866 $ 4,256,043 $ - $ 17,162,300 $ 34,353,174 $ 8,300 $ 212,558,288 NET SOURCE/UE OF FUNDS $ (10,458,033) $ 22,798,852 $ 1,543,860 $ 68,675 $ 3,989,652 $ 1,342,231 $ (4,202) $ 19,281,035

TYPE OF FUNDSTYPE OF FUNDS
FY 2025-26 COMBINED STATEMENT (DOES NOT INCLUDE TRANSFERS IN/OUT AND CIP)

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 18, Packet Page 287 FY 2025-26 OPERATING BUDGET

REVENUES

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 19, Packet Page 288 FUND TITLE FY 2021-22 ACTUAL FY 2022-23 ACTUAL FY 2023-24 ACTUAL FY 2024-25 AMENDED
BUDGET
FY 2024-25 YTD
ACTUAL (as of May 18,
2025) FY 2025-26 PROPOSED
101 GENERAL FUND $ 97,370,920 $ 98,268,563 $ 104,508,292 $ 107,722,982 $ 92,066,621 $ 109,885,934 105 FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND $ 105,277 $ 221,961 $ 294,749 $ 300,959 $ 273,361 $ 319,638 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 97,476,198 $ 98,490,524 $ 104,803,041 $ 108,023,941 $ 92,339,982 $ 110,205,572 205 SEWER MAINS FUND $ (10,995) $ 10,763 $ 32,681 $ 22,396 $ 22,112 $ 28,027 210 WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND $ 34,723 $ 33,845 $ 33,859 $ 30,000 $ 35,134 $ 36,188 215 SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST $ 26,306 $ 34,489 $ 43,085 $ 33,303 $ 40,933 $ 35,341 216 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 5,717,461 $ 5,979,547 $ 6,192,067 $ 6,040,190 $ 5,241,074 $ 6,100,581 241 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND $ 43,743 $ - $ 8,027 $ - $ - $ - 249 STATE COPS - AB1913 (DVO) $ 159,730 $ 169,720 $ 187,846 $ 200,007 $ 172,139 $ 205,387 251 GAS TAX FUND $ 665,766 $ 709,643 $ 822,807 $ 823,859 $ 699,463 $ 843,873 252 STREET INFRASTRUCTURE REHAB FUND (MEASUR $ 11,292,986 $ 11,960,274 $ 12,884,422 $ 12,310,231 $ 8,359,809 $ 12,391,265 253 CCFD BONDS - PROJECT FUND $ (5) $ 1 $ 14 $ 155 $ - $ - 254 CCFD-CITY REVENUE FUND $ (21,127) $ 20,639 $ 57,147 $ 30,420 $ 38,665 $ 40,266 257 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & INVESTMENT PLAN $ 1,317,820 $ 1,426,329 $ 1,494,673 $ 1,426,202 $ 1,196,117 $ 1,471,513 258 SB1 ROAD MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION $ 585,043 $ 671,678 $ 808,174 $ 757,697 $ 674,396 $ 838,963 261 ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT $ 49,056 $ 52,328 $ 51,640 $ 48,500 $ 408 $ 48,513 262 CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT $ 25,130 $ 25,535 $ 4,598 $ 28,059 $ 5 $ 27,535 263 S CANNERY ROW PARKING DISTRICT $ (26) $ (6) $ 10 $ - $ - $ - 264 PARKING ADJUSTMENT FEE-FUND A $ 307 $ 2,298 $ 2,336 $ 3,612 $ 2,147 $ 3,685 266 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FUND $ 13,295 $ 13,223 $ 13,347 $ 13,272 $ (2,582) $ 13,524 267 CANNERY ROW PARKING VARIANCES $ 1,799 $ 593 $ 42 $ 1,822 $ 27 $ 1,829 268 LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND $ 259,129 $ 245,855 $ 551,143 $ 486,791 $ 662,682 $ 547,051 269 EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $ 896,777 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 270 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND $ 892,924 $ 874,438 $ 1,098,761 $ 1,421,947 $ 983,035 $ 1,553,268 274 HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA $ 92,367 $ 99,555 $ 103,152 $ 92,326 $ 37,897 $ 100,236 277 PARK DEDICATION FEES FUND $ (589) $ 449 $ 27 $ 14 $ 18 $ 19 278 HOME GRANT 2005 FUND $ (4,305) $ 4,085 $ 11,075 $ 5,895 $ 7,493 $ 7,803 279 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 2,269,664 $ 2,492,307 $ 2,597,612 $ 2,546,748 $ 3,632,188 $ 3,810,000 280 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $ 937,470 $ 1,370,901 $ 955,101 $ 603,387 $ 360,059 $ 99,032 281 INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT $ (282) $ 276 $ 838 $ 446 $ 99,027 $ 590 290 WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND $ (5,020) $ 4,914 $ 14,920 $ 7,942 $ 10,095 $ 10,513 291 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS $ 59,688 $ 87,947 $ 97,609 $ 75,000 $ 85,643 $ 120,000 292 ASSET SEIZURE FUND $ 2,824 $ 2,211 $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ 5,000 295 FEMA FUND $ - $ 34,529 $ 695,714 $ - $ 109,349 $ -
298 PUBLIC EDUC & GOV ACCESS (PEG) $ (72) $ (231) $ (187) $ - $ - $ - 299 SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND $ (678) $ 664 $ 2,015 $ 1,073 $ 1,245 $ 1,420 310 DEBT SERVICE FUND $ 3,022 $ 2,626 $ 4,635 $ 696 $ 1,725 $ 1,016 314 RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND $ (1,104) $ 1,083 $ 2,979 $ 1,585 $ 2,015 $ 2,098 404 STATE LOAN $ (66,366) $ 66,366 $ - $ - $ - $ -
405 CIP - STATE FUNDING SOURCE $ 846,585 $ 398,569 $ - $ - $ 61,699 $ - 406 FEDERAL STIMULUS PROJECTS $ 2,345,042 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 407 CIP - OTHER FUNDING SOURCE $ 17,151 $ 17,360 $ 129,693 $ - $ - $ - 408 CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION $ 6,435 $ 1,385 $ - $ - $ - $ - 410 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 515,948 $ 35,822 $ - $ - $ - $ - 600 MARINA FUND $ 3,392,006 $ 3,609,532 $ 3,802,379 $ 3,903,441 $ 3,401,179 $ 4,072,860 610 CEMETERY FUND $ 474,003 $ 453,708 $ 329,339 $ 344,600 $ 414,089 $ 348,200 625 PARKING FUND $ 12,323,201 $ 12,893,896 $ 12,787,173 $ 11,994,587 $ 11,586,044 $ 12,959,571 641 MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY $ (925) $ 971 $ 1,323 $ 755 $ 500 $ 521 642 OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD $ - $ 390 $ 190 $ 2,000 $ - $ 2,000 650 PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS $ 7,529,998 $ 24,081,320 $ 18,355,948 $ 30,057,760 $ 12,169,258 $ 29,766,472 655 NAVY SERVICES FUND $ 249,839 $ 277,060 $ 239,410 $ 330,000 $ 256,715 $ 330,000 705 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND $ 633,021 $ 1,182,266 $ 1,308,489 $ 3,637,155 $ 1,140,246 $ 3,437,324 708 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 2,546,407 $ 2,558,780 $ 2,742,984 $ 3,445,347 $ 2,068,946 $ 3,278,054 710 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND $ 4,396,813 $ 7,379,489 $ 4,787,188 $ 4,886,740 $ 3,644,646 $ 8,147,694 715 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST $ 3,464,495 $ 4,271,877 $ 4,316,741 $ 4,106,328 $ 3,133,456 $ 3,704,773 716 LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE $ 3,920,979 $ 3,951,786 $ 5,365,100 $ 4,716,862 $ 3,541,665 $ 5,305,851 718 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND $ 9,510,792 $ 10,131,856 $ 10,929,072 $ 11,215,810 $ 10,233,254 $ 11,821,710 807 TIDELANDS TRUST FUND $ 3,621,684 $ 4,120,989 $ 4,335,485 $ 3,947,736 $ 3,099,712 $ 3,998,686 810 LIBRARY TRUST FUND $ 260,985 $ 381,780 $ 337,604 $ 177,735 $ 231,054 $ 227,674 818 MUSEUM TRUST FUND $ 4,898 $ 40,843 $ 20,759 $ 22,948 $ 65,410 $ 49,689 821 SCHOLZE PARK TRUST FUND $ (18,277) $ 17,829 $ 51,314 $ 265 $ 32,783 $ 34,359 822 SCHOLZE PLAYGROUND TRUST FUND $ (18,153) $ 17,662 $ 50,128 $ - $ 32,741 $ 34,316 900 SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND $ 129,743 $ (4,765) $ 3,007 $ - $ - $ - 918 CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 $ 5,391,100 $ 5,975,289 $ 6,098,818 $ 6,011,368 $ 5,091,834 $ 5,798,887 952 MONTEREY CO TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DIST $ 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 956 NEW MONTEREY BUS.IMPROVE.DIST. $ - $ - $ (804) $ - $ - $ - 961 GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND $ - $ - $ 6,813 $ 9,775 $ 14 $ 9,775 $ 184,256,427 $ 206,685,088 $ 209,573,364 $ 223,853,728 $ 175,017,543 $ 231,878,524 FY 2025-26 PROPOSED SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY FUND (DOES NOT INCLUDE TRANSFERS IN/OUT AND CIP)

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 20, Packet Page 289 FUND TITLE FY 2021-22 ACTUAL FY 2022-23 ACTUAL FY 2023-24 ACTUAL FY 2024-25 AMENDED
BUDGET
FY 2024-25 YTD
ACTUAL (as of May 18,
2025)
FY 2025-26

PROPOSED
Fund 101 -- GENERAL FUND
3110 PROPERTY TAXES $ 13,680,790 $ 14,728,138 $ 15,441,794 $ 15,795,810 $ 15,842,977 $ 17,074,474 3120 SALES TAX $ 14,937,322 $ 15,479,785 $ 15,295,237 $ 15,748,711 $ 10,183,120 $ 16,113,000 3140 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES $ 28,375,420 $ 30,282,539 $ 29,678,681 $ 30,250,000 $ 25,076,380 $ 29,687,000 3150 BUSINESS LICENSE $ 3,215,649 $ 3,862,220 $ 4,601,563 $ 4,800,000 $ 4,791,686 $ 5,300,000 3160 UTILITY USERS TAXES $ 4,184,273 $ 4,700,838 $ 4,915,491 $ 4,997,218 $ 4,186,055 $ 5,247,080 3170 FRANCHISE FEES $ 2,892,821 $ 2,746,824 $ 2,916,660 $ 2,765,500 $ 2,073,290 $ 2,765,500 3190 OTHER TAXES $ 717,958 $ 517,910 $ 583,007 $ 528,214 $ 423,293 $ 528,214 3300 LICENSES & PERMITS $ 1,792,347 $ 2,052,133 $ 2,039,818 $ 2,015,320 $ 2,291,050 $ 2,328,650 3400 FINES & FORFEITURES $ 245,867 $ 271,255 $ 743,133 $ 257,000 $ 312,824 $ 259,000 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 8,638,757 $ 2,011,887 $ 1,259,307 $ 4,245,217 $ 1,733,666 $ 3,000,782 3600 INTEREST $ (166,181) $ 1,062,098 $ 3,857,782 $ 1,630,947 $ 2,038,768 $ 2,442,144 3620 RENTS $ 2,930,602 $ 2,407,041 $ 2,593,494 $ 2,828,329 $ 2,278,672 $ 2,690,166 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 15,259,813 $ 17,789,786 $ 20,074,694 $ 20,540,855 $ 19,708,069 $ 21,895,823 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 665,483 $ 356,110 $ 507,629 $ 1,319,862 $ 1,126,772 $ 554,101 Total 101 -- GENERAL FUND $ 97,370,920 $ 98,268,563 $ 104,508,292 $ 107,722,982 $ 92,066,621 $ 109,885,934 Fund 105 -- FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 105,277 $ 221,961 $ 294,749 $ 300,959 $ 273,361 $ 319,638 Total 105 -- FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND $ 105,277 $ 221,961 $ 294,749 $ 300,959 $ 273,361 $ 319,638 Fund 205 -- SEWER MAINS FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (10,995) $ 10,763 $ 32,681 $ 17,396 $ 22,112 $ 23,027 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ - $ - $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ 5,000
Total 205 -- SEWER MAINS FUND $ (10,995) $ 10,763 $ 32,681 $ 22,396 $ 22,112 $ 28,027 Fund 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 34,723 $ 33,845 $ 33,859 $ 30,000 $ 35,134 $ 36,188 Total 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND $ 34,723 $ 33,845 $ 33,859 $ 30,000 $ 35,134 $ 36,188 Fund 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST
3110 PROPERTY TAXES $ 29,344 $ 31,655 $ 33,240 $ 28,000 $ 33,857 $ 28,000 3600 INTEREST $ (3,038) $ 2,833 $ 9,845 $ 5,303 $ 7,076 $ 7,341 Total 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST $ 26,306 $ 34,489 $ 43,085 $ 33,303 $ 40,933 $ 35,341 Fund 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND
3140 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES $ 5,404,814 $ 5,767,989 $ 5,653,070 $ 5,771,110 $ 4,776,452 $ 5,659,110 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 263,600 $ 20,311 $ 100,000 $ - $ - $ - 3600 INTEREST $ 44,296 $ 191,248 $ 438,998 $ 269,080 $ 464,622 $ 441,471 3900 TRANSFERS IN $ 4,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 5,717,461 $ 5,979,547 $ 6,192,067 $ 6,040,190 $ 5,241,074 $ 6,100,581 Fund 241 -- FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 43,743 $ - $ 8,027 $ - $ - $ - Total 241 -- FEDERAL/STATE PROJECTS FUND $ 43,743 $ - $ 8,027 $ - $ - $ - Fund 249 -- STATE COPS - AB1913 (DVO)
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 161,285 $ 165,271 $ 186,159 $ 200,000 $ 169,663 $ 200,000 3600 INTEREST $ (1,554) $ 4,449 $ 1,687 $ 7 $ 2,475 $ 5,387 Total 249 -- STATE COPS - AB1913 (DVO) $ 159,730 $ 169,720 $ 187,846 $ 200,007 $ 172,139 $ 205,387 Fund 251 -- GAS TAX FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 649,027 $ 695,773 $ 750,635 $ 784,111 $ 627,585 $ 776,234 3600 INTEREST $ (13,048) $ 13,870 $ 72,172 $ 39,748 $ 71,878 $ 67,639 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 29,787 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 251 -- GAS TAX FUND $ 665,766 $ 709,643 $ 822,807 $ 823,859 $ 699,463 $ 843,873 Fund 252 -- STREET INFRASTRUCTURE REHAB FUND (MEASUR
3120 SALES TAX $ 11,453,238 $ 11,804,659 $ 11,849,946 $ 11,952,000 $ 7,889,174 $ 11,952,000 3600 INTEREST $ (160,252) $ 155,614 $ 709,073 $ 358,231 $ 470,635 $ 439,265 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ - $ - $ 325,403 $ - $ - $ -
Total 252 -- STREET INFRASTRUCTURE REHAB FUND (ME $ 11,292,986 $ 11,960,274 $ 12,884,422 $ 12,310,231 $ 8,359,809 $ 12,391,265 Fund 253 -- CCFD BONDS - PROJECT FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (5) $ 1 $ 14 $ 155 $ - $ -
Total 253 -- CCFD BONDS - PROJECT FUND $ (5) $ 1 $ 14 $ 155 $ - $ - Fund 254 -- CCFD-CITY REVENUE FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (21,127) $ 20,639 $ 57,147 $ 30,420 $ 38,665 $ 40,266 Total 254 -- CCFD-CITY REVENUE FUND $ (21,127) $ 20,639 $ 57,147 $ 30,420 $ 38,665 $ 40,266 Fund 257 -- TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & INVESTMENT PLAN
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 1,280,008 $ 1,330,512 $ 1,335,903 $ 1,313,934 $ 1,040,176 $ 1,313,934 3600 INTEREST $ 37,813 $ 95,817 $ 158,770 $ 112,268 $ 155,941 $ 157,579 Total 257 -- TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & INVESTMENT P $ 1,317,820 $ 1,426,329 $ 1,494,673 $ 1,426,202 $ 1,196,117 $ 1,471,513 Fund 258 -- SB1 ROAD MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 568,773 $ 628,436 $ 719,982 $ 703,538 $ 581,883 $ 747,066 3600 INTEREST $ 16,271 $ 43,242 $ 88,192 $ 54,159 $ 92,513 $ 91,897 Total 258 -- SB1 ROAD MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATIO $ 585,043 $ 671,678 $ 808,174 $ 757,697 $ 674,396 $ 838,963 Fund 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT
3190 OTHER TAXES $ 49,021 $ 52,092 $ 51,608 $ 48,500 $ 406 $ 48,500 3600 INTEREST $ 35 $ 236 $ 32 $ - $ 2 $ 13
Total 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT $ 49,056 $ 52,328 $ 51,640 $ 48,500 $ 408 $ 48,513 Fund 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT
3190 OTHER TAXES $ 25,503 $ 25,180 $ 3,703 $ 27,500 $ - $ 27,500 3600 INTEREST $ (373) $ 355 $ 895 $ 559 $ 5 $ 35
Total 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT $ 25,130 $ 25,535 $ 4,598 $ 28,059 $ 5 $ 27,535 Fund 263 -- S CANNERY ROW PARKING DISTRICT
3600 INTEREST $ (26) $ (6) $ 10 $ - $ - $ -
Total 263 -- S CANNERY ROW PARKING DISTRICT $ (26) $ (6) $ 10 $ - $ - $ - Fund 264 -- PARKING ADJUSTMENT FEE-FUND A
3600 INTEREST $ (7) $ 18 $ 56 $ 22 $ 57 $ 95
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 314 $ 2,280 $ 2,280 $ 3,590 $ 2,090 $ 3,590 Total 264 -- PARKING ADJUSTMENT FEE-FUND A $ 307 $ 2,298 $ 2,336 $ 3,612 $ 2,147 $ 3,685 Fund 266 -- TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FUND
3600 INTEREST $ 50 $ (22) $ 102 $ 22 $ 130 $ 274
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 13,245 $ 13,245 $ 13,245 $ 13,250 $ (2,712) $ 13,250 Total 266 -- TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT FUND $ 13,295 $ 13,223 $ 13,347 $ 13,272 $ (2,582) $ 13,524 Fund 267 -- CANNERY ROW PARKING VARIANCES
3600 INTEREST $ (1) $ (7) $ 42 $ 22 $ 27 $ 29
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 1,800 $ 600 $ - $ 1,800 $ - $ 1,800 Total 267 -- CANNERY ROW PARKING VARIANCES $ 1,799 $ 593 $ 42 $ 1,822 $ 27 $ 1,829 Fund 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND
3600 INTEREST $ 226,581 $ 167,114 $ 455,837 $ 186,791 $ 257,499 $ 205,151 3620 RENTS $ 67,322 $ 78,485 $ 100,160 $ 65,000 $ 88,104 $ 81,900 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ (34,774) $ 256 $ (4,855) $ 235,000 $ 317,079 $ 260,000 FY 2025-26 PROPOSED SUMMARY OF REVENUES BY FUND AND TYPE (DOES NOT INCLUDE TRANSFERS IN/OUT AND CIP)

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 21, Packet Page 290 Total 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND $ 259,129 $ 245,855 $ 551,143 $ 486,791 $ 662,682 $ 547,051 Fund 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 896,777 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRA $ 896,777 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 263,657 $ 235,491 $ 347,338 $ 250,000 $ 65,595 $ 250,000 3600 INTEREST $ 269,801 $ 288,064 $ 313,159 $ 151,947 $ - $ 128,000 3620 RENTS $ 359,466 $ 358,992 $ 333,712 $ 520,000 $ 388,474 $ 500,000 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ - $ (8,109) $ 104,551 $ 500,000 $ 528,967 $ 675,268 Total 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND $ 892,924 $ 874,438 $ 1,098,761 $ 1,421,947 $ 983,035 $ 1,553,268 Fund 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ 120 $ - $ - $ - $ -
3600 INTEREST $ (2,454) $ 2,193 $ 13,100 $ 6,826 $ 9,471 $ 9,736 3620 RENTS $ 92,992 $ 97,159 $ 88,874 $ 84,000 $ 27,701 $ 89,000 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 1,829 $ 83 $ 1,178 $ 1,500 $ 725 $ 1,500 Total 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRA $ 92,367 $ 99,555 $ 103,152 $ 92,326 $ 37,897 $ 100,236 Fund 277 -- PARK DEDICATION FEES FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (589) $ 449 $ 27 $ 14 $ 18 $ 19
Total 277 -- PARK DEDICATION FEES FUND $ (589) $ 449 $ 27 $ 14 $ 18 $ 19 Fund 278 -- HOME GRANT 2005 FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (4,305) $ 4,085 $ 11,075 $ 5,895 $ 7,493 $ 7,803 Total 278 -- HOME GRANT 2005 FUND $ (4,305) $ 4,085 $ 11,075 $ 5,895 $ 7,493 $ 7,803 Fund 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (63,284) $ 59,673 $ 179,659 $ 106,248 $ 95,450 $ 103,060 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 2,332,948 $ 2,432,634 $ 2,417,953 $ 2,440,500 $ 3,536,738 $ 3,706,940 Total 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 2,269,664 $ 2,492,307 $ 2,597,612 $ 2,546,748 $ 3,632,188 $ 3,810,000 Fund 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (8,676) $ 5,525 $ 49,226 $ 30,087 $ 27,235 $ 26,232 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 853,750 $ 1,188,124 $ 856,084 $ 502,100 $ 206,749 $ 2,100 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 92,397 $ 177,252 $ 49,792 $ 71,200 $ 126,075 $ 70,700 Total 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $ 937,470 $ 1,370,901 $ 955,101 $ 603,387 $ 360,059 $ 99,032 Fund 281 -- INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATERSHED MANAGEMENT
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 98,461 $ -
3600 INTEREST $ (282) $ 276 $ 838 $ 446 $ 567 $ 590
Total 281 -- INTEGRATED REGIONAL WATERSHED MANA $ (282) $ 276 $ 838 $ 446 $ 99,027 $ 590 Fund 290 -- WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (5,020) $ 4,914 $ 14,920 $ 7,942 $ 10,095 $ 10,513 Total 290 -- WATER SYSTEM IMPROV FUND $ (5,020) $ 4,914 $ 14,920 $ 7,942 $ 10,095 $ 10,513 Fund 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 44,196 $ 46,692 $ 50,900 $ 50,000 $ 47,107 $ 50,000 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 15,491 $ 41,255 $ 46,709 $ 25,000 $ 38,536 $ 70,000 Total 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS $ 59,688 $ 87,947 $ 97,609 $ 75,000 $ 85,643 $ 120,000 Fund 292 -- ASSET SEIZURE FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 2,824 $ 2,211 $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ 5,000 Total 292 -- ASSET SEIZURE FUND $ 2,824 $ 2,211 $ - $ 5,000 $ - $ 5,000 Fund 295 -- FEMA FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ 34,529 $ 695,714 $ - $ 109,349 $ - Total 295 -- FEMA FUND $ - $ 34,529 $ 695,714 $ - $ 109,349 $ - Fund 298 -- PUBLIC EDUC & GOV ACCESS (PEG)
3600 INTEREST $ (72) $ (231) $ (187) $ - $ - $ -
Total 298 -- PUBLIC EDUC & GOV ACCESS (PEG) $ (72) $ (231) $ (187) $ - $ - $ - Fund 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (678) $ 664 $ 2,015 $ 1,073 $ 1,245 $ 1,420 Total 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND $ (678) $ 664 $ 2,015 $ 1,073 $ 1,245 $ 1,420 Fund 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND
3600 INTEREST $ 3,022 $ 2,626 $ 4,635 $ 696 $ 1,725 $ 1,016 Total 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND $ 3,022 $ 2,626 $ 4,635 $ 696 $ 1,725 $ 1,016 Fund 314 -- RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (1,104) $ 1,083 $ 2,979 $ 1,585 $ 2,015 $ 2,098 Total 314 -- RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT FUND $ (1,104) $ 1,083 $ 2,979 $ 1,585 $ 2,015 $ 2,098 Fund 404 -- STATE LOAN
3600 INTEREST $ (66,366) $ 66,366 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 404 -- STATE LOAN $ (66,366) $ 66,366 $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 405 -- CIP - STATE FUNDING SOURCE
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 846,585 $ 398,569 $ - $ - $ 61,699 $ - Total 405 -- CIP - STATE FUNDING SOURCE $ 846,585 $ 398,569 $ - $ - $ 61,699 $ - Fund 406 -- FEDERAL STIMULUS PROJECTS
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 2,345,042 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 406 -- FEDERAL STIMULUS PROJECTS $ 2,345,042 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 407 -- CIP - OTHER FUNDING SOURCE
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 17,151 $ 17,360 $ 129,693 $ - $ - $ - Total 407 -- CIP - OTHER FUNDING SOURCE $ 17,151 $ 17,360 $ 129,693 $ - $ - $ - Fund 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION
3600 INTEREST $ 6,435 $ 1,385 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION $ 6,435 $ 1,385 $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 472,292 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
3800 OTHER REVENUES $ - $ 22,990 $ - $ - $ - $ -
3900 TRANSFERS IN $ 43,656 $ 12,832 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 515,948 $ 35,822 $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 600 -- MARINA FUND
3300 LICENSES & PERMITS $ 30,140 $ 46,206 $ 54,196 $ 40,000 $ 43,915 $ 56,700 3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ - $ - $ 74,700 $ - $ 30,000 3600 INTEREST $ (78,137) $ 159,616 $ 167,148 $ 75,732 $ 92,617 $ 75,263 3620 RENTS $ 506,521 $ 491,251 $ 589,024 $ 528,000 $ 457,195 $ 585,000 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 2,899,534 $ 2,843,190 $ 2,956,732 $ 3,142,809 $ 2,762,090 $ 3,280,897 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 33,948 $ 69,269 $ 35,279 $ 42,200 $ 45,362 $ 45,000 Total 600 -- MARINA FUND $ 3,392,006 $ 3,609,532 $ 3,802,379 $ 3,903,441 $ 3,401,179 $ 4,072,860 Fund 610 -- CEMETERY FUND
$ - $ - $ 10,728 $ - $ 46,111 $ 39,200
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ (0) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
3600 INTEREST $ (1,128) $ 8,330 $ 2,437 $ - $ - $ -
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 426,246 $ 406,406 $ 277,667 $ 307,600 $ 365,448 $ 309,000 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 48,886 $ 38,971 $ 38,508 $ 37,000 $ 2,530 $ - Total 610 -- CEMETERY FUND $ 474,003 $ 453,708 $ 329,339 $ 344,600 $ 414,089 $ 348,200 Fund 625 -- PARKING FUND
3300 LICENSES & PERMITS $ 749,591 $ 832,607 $ 914,131 $ 800,000 $ 792,771 $ 800,000 3400 FINES & FORFEITURES $ 1,727,264 $ 1,904,177 $ 2,056,671 $ 1,707,500 $ 1,774,317 $ 1,707,500

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 22, Packet Page 291 3600 INTEREST $ (131,371) $ 366,462 $ 427,631 $ 211,478 $ 354,242 $ 323,810 3620 RENTS $ 371,458 $ 380,628 $ 337,260 $ 325,000 $ 261,170 $ 340,000 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 9,521,703 $ 9,293,581 $ 8,907,214 $ 8,762,500 $ 8,312,021 $ 9,598,500 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 84,556 $ 116,442 $ 144,267 $ 188,109 $ 91,523 $ 189,761 Total 625 -- PARKING FUND $ 12,323,201 $ 12,893,896 $ 12,787,173 $ 11,994,587 $ 11,586,044 $ 12,959,571 Fund 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY
3600 INTEREST $ (925) $ 971 $ 1,323 $ 755 $ 500 $ 521
Total 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY $ (925) $ 971 $ 1,323 $ 755 $ 500 $ 521 Fund 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD
3800 OTHER REVENUES $ - $ 390 $ 190 $ 2,000 $ - $ 2,000 Total 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD $ - $ 390 $ 190 $ 2,000 $ - $ 2,000 Fund 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS
3600 INTEREST $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ -
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 6,423,564 $ 13,864,489 $ 12,225,422 $ 14,409,795 $ 9,544,631 $ 14,262,426 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 1,106,434 $ 10,216,832 $ 6,130,526 $ 15,637,965 $ 2,624,627 $ 15,504,046 Total 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS $ 7,529,998 $ 24,081,320 $ 18,355,948 $ 30,057,760 $ 12,169,258 $ 29,766,472 Fund 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (1,368) $ 1,368 $ (354) $ - $ - $ -
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 251,207 $ 275,692 $ 239,764 $ 330,000 $ 256,715 $ 330,000 Total 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND $ 249,839 $ 277,060 $ 239,410 $ 330,000 $ 256,715 $ 330,000 Fund 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (98,506) $ (8,929) $ 36,987 $ - $ - $ - 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 731,527 $ 1,119,981 $ 1,163,535 $ 3,519,330 $ 981,171 $ 2,769,469 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ - $ 71,214 $ 107,967 $ 117,825 $ 159,075 $ 667,855 Total 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND $ 633,021 $ 1,182,266 $ 1,308,489 $ 3,637,155 $ 1,140,246 $ 3,437,324 Fund 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 2,545,022 $ 2,558,075 $ 2,742,252 $ 3,443,597 $ 2,068,199 $ 3,276,004 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 1,385 $ 705 $ 732 $ 1,750 $ 747 $ 2,050 Total 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 2,546,407 $ 2,558,780 $ 2,742,984 $ 3,445,347 $ 2,068,946 $ 3,278,054 Fund 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 4,383,682 $ 7,379,489 $ 4,787,188 $ 4,886,740 $ 3,644,646 $ 8,147,694 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 13,131 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND $ 4,396,813 $ 7,379,489 $ 4,787,188 $ 4,886,740 $ 3,644,646 $ 8,147,694 Fund 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 3,143,534 $ 3,930,010 $ 4,123,704 $ 4,041,328 $ 3,079,746 $ 3,639,773 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 320,961 $ 341,867 $ 193,037 $ 65,000 $ 53,710 $ 65,000 Total 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST $ 3,464,495 $ 4,271,877 $ 4,316,741 $ 4,106,328 $ 3,133,456 $ 3,704,773 Fund 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE
3600 INTEREST $ - $ - $ 652,062 $ - $ - $ -
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 3,893,562 $ 3,852,281 $ 4,683,581 $ 4,716,862 $ 3,539,739 $ 5,305,851 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 27,418 $ 99,505 $ 29,457 $ - $ 1,926 $ - Total 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE $ 3,920,979 $ 3,951,786 $ 5,365,100 $ 4,716,862 $ 3,541,665 $ 5,305,851 Fund 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND
3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 9,510,792 $ 10,131,856 $ 10,929,072 $ 11,215,810 $ 10,233,254 $ 11,821,710 Total 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND $ 9,510,792 $ 10,131,856 $ 10,929,072 $ 11,215,810 $ 10,233,254 $ 11,821,710 Fund 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND
3600 INTEREST $ 387,874 $ 645,057 $ 701,477 $ 48,277 $ 66,298 $ 48,173 3620 RENTS $ 3,045,791 $ 2,872,569 $ 3,011,854 $ 3,371,403 $ 2,788,133 $ 3,441,403 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 186,994 $ 198,442 $ 214,716 $ 224,456 $ 173,332 $ 229,510 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 1,025 $ 404,921 $ 407,438 $ 303,600 $ 71,950 $ 279,600 Total 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND $ 3,621,684 $ 4,120,989 $ 4,335,485 $ 3,947,736 $ 3,099,712 $ 3,998,686 Fund 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ 64,800 $ 202,745 $ 105,573 $ 54,000 $ 4,327 $ 54,000 3600 INTEREST $ (9,201) $ 7,607 $ 36,682 $ 19,235 $ 17,990 $ 19,174 3700 FEES & CHARGES $ 2,999 $ 3,548 $ 3,371 $ 2,500 $ 5,873 $ 2,500 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 202,387 $ 167,881 $ 191,977 $ 102,000 $ 202,864 $ 152,000 Total 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND $ 260,985 $ 381,780 $ 337,604 $ 177,735 $ 231,054 $ 227,674 Fund 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND
3500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL $ - $ 30,000 $ - $ 10,000 $ 50,000 $ 35,000 3600 INTEREST $ (3,455) $ 3,758 $ 8,552 $ 4,648 $ 6,775 $ 5,889 3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 8,353 $ 7,085 $ 12,207 $ 8,300 $ 8,635 $ 8,800 Total 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND $ 4,898 $ 40,843 $ 20,759 $ 22,948 $ 65,410 $ 49,689 Fund 821 -- SCHOLZE PARK TRUST FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (18,277) $ 17,829 $ 51,314 $ 265 $ 32,783 $ 34,359 Total 821 -- SCHOLZE PARK TRUST FUND $ (18,277) $ 17,829 $ 51,314 $ 265 $ 32,783 $ 34,359 Fund 822 -- SCHOLZE PLAYGROUND TRUST FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (18,153) $ 17,662 $ 50,128 $ - $ 32,741 $ 34,316 Total 822 -- SCHOLZE PLAYGROUND TRUST FUND $ (18,153) $ 17,662 $ 50,128 $ - $ 32,741 $ 34,316 Fund 900 -- SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND
3600 INTEREST $ (5,929) $ (4,765) $ 3,007 $ - $ - $ -
3800 OTHER REVENUES $ 135,672 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 900 -- SPECIAL DEPOSITS FUND $ 129,743 $ (4,765) $ 3,007 $ - $ - $ - Fund 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1
3130 CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST TAX $ 5,422,072 $ 5,872,107 $ 5,823,673 $ 6,000,000 $ 4,892,167 $ 5,700,000 3600 INTEREST $ (30,972) $ 103,182 $ 275,145 $ 11,368 $ 199,667 $ 98,887 Total 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 $ 5,391,100 $ 5,975,289 $ 6,098,818 $ 6,011,368 $ 5,091,834 $ 5,798,887 Fund 952 -- MONTEREY CO TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DIST
3190 OTHER TAXES $ 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 952 -- MONTEREY CO TOURISM IMPROVEMENT DIS $ 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 956 -- NEW MONTEREY BUS.IMPROVE.DIST.
3190 OTHER TAXES $ - $ - $ (804) $ - $ - $ -
Total 956 -- NEW MONTEREY BUS.IMPROVE.DIST. $ - $ - $ (804) $ - $ - $ - Fund 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND
3800 OTHER REVENUES $ - $ - $ 6,813 $ 9,775 $ 14 $ 9,775 Total 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND $ - $ - $ 6,813 $ 9,775 $ 14 $ 9,775 Total $ 184,256,427 $ 206,685,088 $ 209,573,364 $ 223,853,728 $ 175,017,543 $ 231,878,524

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 23, Packet Page 292

EXPENDITURES
FY 2025-26 OPERATING BUDGET

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 24, Packet Page 293 FUND TITLE FY 2021-22 ACTUAL FY 2022-23 ACTUAL FY 2023-24 ACTUAL FY 2024-25 AMENDED
BUDGET
FY 2024-25 YTD
ACTUAL (as of May 18,
2025)
FY 2025-26

PROPOSED
101 GENERAL FUND $ 78,820,379 $ 89,177,654 $ 95,573,719 $ 115,134,338 $ 84,260,860 $ 120,383,605 105 FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 280,000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 78,820,379 $ 89,177,654 $ 95,573,719 $ 115,134,338 $ 84,260,860 $ 120,663,605 210 WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND $ 37,341 $ 15,632 $ 89,089 $ 75,000 $ 15,542 $ 75,000 215 SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST $ 21,303 $ 21,114 $ 22,704 $ 29,363 $ 18,890 $ 24,380 216 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 701,554 $ 1,616,037 $ 1,664,909 $ 22,753,380 $ 2,302,330 $ 387,132 251 GAS TAX FUND $ - $ 16,138 $ 3,861 $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 261 ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT $ 101,280 $ 106,284 $ 112,525 $ 114,855 $ 36,491 $ 57,262 262 CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT $ 29,548 $ 29,615 $ 28,445 $ 27,908 $ 11,797 $ 9,840 268 LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND $ 254,953 $ 323,606 $ 74,952 $ 177,077 $ 60,064 $ 204,002 269 EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM $ 894,644 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 270 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND $ 953,856 $ 1,232,158 $ 835,619 $ 1,265,149 $ 564,762 $ 1,596,318 274 HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA $ 52,627 $ 47,152 $ 79,711 $ 55,908 $ 33 $ 55,000 279 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 1,869,855 $ 2,559,325 $ 2,939,899 $ 3,081,922 $ 2,783,807 $ 3,316,981 280 STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $ 977,566 $ 1,188,191 $ 1,148,512 $ 2,031,877 $ 740,813 $ 1,295,589 291 PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS $ 111,172 $ 124,490 $ 97,733 $ 151,000 $ 95,056 $ 37,500 292 ASSET SEIZURE FUND $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
299 SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND $ - $ - $ - $ 12,500 $ 11,528 $ 12,500 310 DEBT SERVICE FUND $ 545,566 $ 541,635 $ 542,316 $ 542,416 $ 542,416 $ 546,936 408 CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION $ 16,654 $ 410 $ - $ 1,827,045 $ - $ - 410 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 10,507,411 $ 7,584,175 $ 16,501,516 $ 78,103,137 $ 13,966,329 $ - 600 MARINA FUND $ 1,333,971 $ 5,164,955 $ 3,487,353 $ 2,977,118 $ 1,688,428 $ 2,653,630 610 CEMETERY FUND $ 361,311 $ 602,404 $ 542,161 $ 623,814 $ 461,959 $ 788,709 625 PARKING FUND $ 2,805,403 $ 5,461,375 $ 7,761,030 $ 10,726,953 $ 7,385,733 $ 10,402,980 641 MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY $ (1,062,344) $ 107,157 $ 109,947 $ - $ - $ - 642 OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD $ - $ 390 $ 190 $ 8,300 $ 140 $ 8,300 650 PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS $ 17,452,743 $ 16,028,784 $ 15,750,994 $ 29,441,303 $ 13,825,000 $ 28,891,575 655 NAVY SERVICES FUND $ 306,647 $ 254,570 $ 212,074 $ 330,000 $ 185,254 $ 330,000 705 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND $ 1,080,321 $ 903,163 $ 1,050,314 $ 2,481,910 $ 1,417,457 $ 2,135,921 708 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 559,365 $ 2,968,774 $ 2,930,195 $ 3,296,516 $ 2,299,429 $ 3,237,356 710 INFORMATION SERVICES FUND $ 1,568,354 $ 5,213,916 $ 5,971,564 $ 7,282,558 $ 4,975,623 $ 8,147,694 715 WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST $ 5,010,514 $ 4,965,538 $ 5,180,468 $ 4,126,122 $ 2,197,489 $ 3,704,644 716 LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE $ 3,109,640 $ 5,022,344 $ 4,114,952 $ 4,731,580 $ 3,617,068 $ 5,305,850 718 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND $ 9,667,173 $ 9,751,455 $ 10,489,247 $ 11,215,810 $ 9,776,709 $ 11,821,710 807 TIDELANDS TRUST FUND $ 3,306,867 $ 3,253,164 $ 3,384,420 $ 2,981,082 $ 2,157,500 $ 2,835,107 810 LIBRARY TRUST FUND $ 178,775 $ 191,979 $ 517,708 $ 199,458 $ 97,220 $ 220,310 818 MUSEUM TRUST FUND $ 1,905 $ 22,661 $ 18,261 $ 122,150 $ 25,242 $ 52,150 918 CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 $ 3,970,236 $ 5,663,013 $ 5,972,327 $ 3,982,516 $ 5,486,089 $ 3,709,107 961 GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND $ - $ - $ 7,587 $ 11,200 $ 574 $ 11,200 GFA GENERAL FIXED ASSET GROUP $ 5,457,538 $ 5,613,972 $ 5,816,181 $ - $ - $ - TOTAL $ 151,014,130 $ 175,773,228 $ 193,032,482 $ 309,941,266 $ 161,007,633 $ 212,558,288 FY 2025-26 PROPOSED SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND (DOES NOT INCLUDE TRANSFERS IN/OUT AND CIP)

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 25, Packet Page 294 FUND TITLE FY 2021-22 ACTUAL FY 2022-23 ACTUAL FY 2023-24 ACTUAL FY 2024-25 AMENDED
BUDGET
FY 2024-25 YTD
ACTUAL (as of May 18,
2025)
FY 2025-26

PROPOSED
Fund 101 -- GENERAL FUND
0100 MAYOR/COUNCIL $ 118,973 $ 130,536 $ 179,811 $ 243,211 $ 179,501 $ 262,323 0210 CITY MANAGER-ADMINISTRATION $ 953,763 $ 975,994 $ 1,140,465 $ 1,591,573 $ 1,097,946 $ 1,540,339 0211 COMMUNICATIONS & OUTREACH $ 220,418 $ 212,461 $ 245,124 $ 250,259 $ 230,610 $ 268,947 0321 CITY CLERK $ 391,782 $ 549,534 $ 488,493 $ 686,362 $ 522,664 $ 663,773 0500 CITY ATTORNEY $ 1,019,343 $ 1,164,806 $ 1,214,733 $ 1,425,342 $ 1,055,134 $ 1,533,667 0600 HUMAN RESOURCES $ 911,324 $ 1,011,280 $ 1,327,478 $ 1,534,691 $ 1,113,182 $ 1,799,184 1110 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION $ 783,907 $ 996,983 $ 1,028,114 $ 1,152,088 $ 730,139 $ 1,231,718 1120 REVENUE DIVISION $ 833,008 $ 799,195 $ 827,161 $ 1,300,232 $ 839,749 $ 1,282,605 1130 ACCOUNTING DIVISION $ 1,340,048 $ 1,425,656 $ 1,545,081 $ 1,900,155 $ 1,481,904 $ 2,047,645 2110 POLICE - OFFICE OF THE CHIEF $ 4,492,750 $ 3,751,322 $ 4,112,371 $ 3,221,816 $ 2,513,464 $ 3,353,877 2120 PATROL DIVISION $ 10,595,290 $ 12,971,435 $ 13,299,556 $ 16,122,473 $ 12,565,231 $ 18,358,824 2130 ADMINISTRATION DIVISION $ 1,780,014 $ 2,388,765 $ 2,353,750 $ 2,795,110 $ 1,971,333 $ 2,897,416 2140 INVESTIGATIONS $ 1,944,579 $ 2,378,780 $ 2,599,948 $ 3,239,884 $ 2,261,660 $ 3,292,375 2510 FIRE - ADMINISTRATION $ 1,789,920 $ 1,888,131 $ 1,847,520 $ 2,009,392 $ 1,521,184 $ 2,128,836 2520 FIRE - PREVENTION $ 326,726 $ 645,092 $ 513,510 $ 982,137 $ 514,462 $ 812,056 2530 FIRE - OPERATIONS $ 22,545,122 $ 23,559,526 $ 25,636,289 $ 27,986,280 $ 22,589,846 $ 30,318,517 2540 FIRE - TRAINING $ 70,726 $ 325,442 $ 440,630 $ 583,392 $ 466,934 $ 596,215 2550 FIRE - EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS $ 70,575 $ 57,218 $ 53,809 $ 101,088 $ 60,578 $ 114,418 3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION $ 730,673 $ 1,017,205 $ 1,076,369 $ 1,261,572 $ 834,278 $ 1,214,277 3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION $ 1,331,532 $ 1,942,126 $ 1,501,367 $ 2,356,039 $ 1,508,205 $ 2,609,285 3151 STREET MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES $ 1,791,931 $ 1,860,709 $ 2,213,374 $ 2,457,913 $ 1,795,841 $ 2,381,451 3152 BUILDING MAINTENANCE $ 1,186,651 $ 1,676,983 $ 1,953,485 $ 2,269,526 $ 1,849,585 $ 2,437,451 3172 CUSTODIAL SERVICES $ 1,159,243 $ 1,038,219 $ 1,231,501 $ 1,471,167 $ 1,079,818 $ 1,515,791 4300 PROPERTY MGMT $ 282,921 $ 268,907 $ 265,521 $ 1,711,173 $ 290,260 $ 425,712 4305 HOUSING ADMINISTRATION $ - $ - $ 513,364 $ 1,487,329 $ 919,406 $ 1,752,693 4400 PLANNING $ 2,454,921 $ 3,236,530 $ 4,096,132 $ 6,211,826 $ 2,782,248 $ 5,969,511 4410 BUILDING SAFETY AND INSPECTION $ 1,283,167 $ 1,437,623 $ 1,619,373 $ 1,872,984 $ 1,367,454 $ 2,103,755 4440 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $ 71,000 $ 40,750 $ 29,874 $ - $ - $ - 5110 PARKS & RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $ 781,417 $ 843,992 $ 982,811 $ 1,192,985 $ 888,449 $ 1,326,250 5121 RECREATION - EL ESTERO PARK CENTER $ 311,585 $ 380,801 $ 327,186 $ 624,590 $ 424,352 $ 525,449 5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER $ 256,549 $ 250,782 $ 271,991 $ 291,485 $ 234,399 $ 306,427 5123 RECREATION - ARCHER PARK CENTER $ 1,910 $ 3,330 $ 4,008 $ - $ - $ - 5124 RECREATION - HILLTOP PARK CENTER $ 363,219 $ 383,866 $ 479,692 $ 631,910 $ 488,161 $ 536,799 5125 RECREATION - CASANOVA OAK KNOLL PARK CT $ 74,143 $ 50,145 $ 48,414 $ 54,961 $ 23,024 $ 58,275 5130 RECREATION - SPECIAL PROGRAMS & EVENTS $ 282,660 $ 544,873 $ 584,994 $ 885,982 $ 479,816 $ 810,866 5160 RECREATION - SPORTS $ 257,195 $ 292,617 $ 376,612 $ 479,463 $ 343,709 $ 547,854 5180 MONTEREY SPORTS CENTER $ 3,507,023 $ 4,207,077 $ 4,757,028 $ 5,635,717 $ 4,290,306 $ 5,996,621 5189 SPORTS CENTER - BLDG MAINT. $ 428,828 $ 787,760 $ 459,499 $ 625,247 $ 511,660 $ 614,568 5210 PARKS $ 4,017,456 $ 3,803,096 $ 4,342,471 $ 5,045,790 $ 3,435,981 $ 4,785,669 5220 VETERANS PARK $ - $ - $ 200,782 $ 298,305 $ 192,059 $ 287,463 5230 URBAN FORESTRY $ 958,921 $ 1,742,843 $ 1,453,595 $ 1,452,156 $ 1,127,347 $ 1,626,334 5510 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION $ 802,596 $ 974,550 $ 820,549 $ 959,430 $ 583,764 $ 973,633 5520 SUPPORT SERVICES $ 349,110 $ 570,558 $ 50,725 $ - $ - $ - 5530 REFERENCE SERVICES $ 254,665 $ 276,038 $ 1,627,972 $ 2,424,086 $ 1,699,867 $ 2,592,914 5540 YOUTH SERVICES $ 288,640 $ 406,192 $ 172 $ - $ - $ 1,564 5550 READERS' SERVICES $ 275,109 $ 298,975 $ 593 $ - $ 561 $ - 5600 MUSEUM $ - $ - $ 569 $ - $ - $ -
5610 MUSEUM $ 174,371 $ 232,220 $ 226,482 $ 297,308 $ 226,066 $ 404,658 5640 PRESIDIO HISTORIC PARK/MUSEUM $ 23,285 $ 34,166 $ - $ - $ 6,420 $ - 6210 CONFERENCE CENTER-ADMIN $ 654,295 $ 709,959 $ 774,091 $ 543,289 $ 470,676 $ 686,516 6220 CONFERENCE CENTER SALES $ 334,781 $ 360,247 $ 327,489 $ 419,283 $ 267,882 $ 537,727 6231 CONFERENCE CENTER - EVENT OPERATIONS $ 1,095,702 $ 1,365,964 $ 1,451,880 $ 2,289,590 $ 1,980,642 $ 2,130,021 6232 CONFERENCE CENTER - BUILDING MAINTENANC $ 341,573 $ 450,589 $ 348,581 $ 458,213 $ 344,630 $ 571,592 6234 CONFERENCE CTR - LANDSCAPE/GENERAL MAI $ 251,954 $ 290,620 $ 286,720 $ 318,412 $ 273,912 $ 296,204 6240 CONFERENCE CENTER - VISITOR PROMOTION $ 1,727,944 $ 1,771,232 $ 1,602,721 $ 1,500,000 $ 1,509,373 $ 1,500,000 9110 NON-DEPARTMENTAL $ 228,724 $ 111,549 $ 63,086 $ 45,028 $ 57,957 $ 20,874 9113 COMMUNITY PROMOTION - CITYWIDE $ 112,338 $ 55,000 $ 65,000 $ 67,000 $ 37,000 $ 67,000 9114 INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS $ 168,778 $ 183,513 $ 221,956 $ 291,300 $ 193,332 $ 191,300 9115 COMMUNITY PROMOTION - JULY 4TH $ 15,303 $ 43,890 $ 61,844 $ 77,793 $ 26,899 $ 74,369 Total 101 -- GENERAL FUND $ 78,820,379 $ 89,177,654 $ 95,573,719 $ 115,134,338 $ 84,260,860 $ 120,383,605 Fund 105 -- FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND
5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000 5124 RECREATION - HILLTOP PARK CENTER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,000 5130 RECREATION - SPECIAL PROGRAMS & EVENTS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000 5180 MONTEREY SPORTS CENTER $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 5210 PARKS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,000
Total 105 -- FACILITY MAINTENANCE FUND $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 280,000 Fund 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND
3420 HARBOR TIDELANDS MAINTENANCE $ 37,341 $ 15,632 $ 89,089 $ 75,000 $ 15,542 $ 75,000 Total 210 -- WHARF I SPRINKLER SYSTEM FUND $ 37,341 $ 15,632 $ 89,089 $ 75,000 $ 15,542 $ 75,000 Fund 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST
5210 PARKS $ 21,303 $ 21,114 $ 22,704 $ 29,363 $ 18,890 $ 24,380 Total 215 -- SKYLINE FOREST SERVICE DIST $ 21,303 $ 21,114 $ 22,704 $ 29,363 $ 18,890 $ 24,380 Fund 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND
3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION $ 184,898 $ 152,989 $ 172,337 $ 326,069 $ 270,051 $ 387,131 3140 CAPITAL PROJECTS DIVISION $ 175,812 $ 175,812 $ 124,704 $ - $ - $ - 3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP $ 340,844 $ 1,287,236 $ 1,367,868 $ 22,427,311 $ 2,032,279 $ 0 Total 216 -- NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT FUND $ 701,554 $ 1,616,037 $ 1,664,909 $ 22,753,380 $ 2,302,330 $ 387,132 Fund 251 -- GAS TAX FUND
3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION $ - $ 16,138 $ 3,861 $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 Total 251 -- GAS TAX FUND $ - $ 16,138 $ 3,861 $ 20,000 $ - $ 20,000 Fund 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT
5210 PARKS $ 101,280 $ 106,284 $ 112,525 $ 114,855 $ 36,491 $ 57,262 Total 261 -- ALVARADO STREET MAINT DISTRICT $ 101,280 $ 106,284 $ 112,525 $ 114,855 $ 36,491 $ 57,262 Fund 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT
5210 PARKS $ 29,548 $ 29,615 $ 28,445 $ 27,908 $ 11,797 $ 9,840 Total 262 -- CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINT DISTRICT $ 29,548 $ 29,615 $ 28,445 $ 27,908 $ 11,797 $ 9,840 Fund 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND
4305 HOUSING ADMINISTRATION $ 254,098 $ 323,031 $ 74,372 $ 173,229 $ 45,577 $ 204,002 4310 HOUSING PROJECTS $ 850 $ 570 $ 575 $ - $ 14,488 $ - 4315 HOUSING TRUST $ 4 $ 4 $ 4 $ 3,848 $ - $ -
Total 268 -- LOW & MODERATE INCOME ASSET FUND $ 254,953 $ 323,606 $ 74,952 $ 177,077 $ 60,064 $ 204,002 Fund 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
FY 2025-26 PROPOSED SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES BY FUND & DIVISION (DOES NOT INCLUDE TRANSFERS IN/OUT AND CIP)

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 26, Packet Page 295 4310 HOUSING PROJECTS $ 894,644 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 269 -- EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRA $ 894,644 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND
4300 PROPERTY MGMT $ 6,200 $ 6,531 $ 7,201 $ 6,000 $ - $ - 4305 HOUSING ADMINISTRATION $ 377,678 $ 425,069 $ 219,591 $ 152,313 $ 47,930 $ 57,237 4310 HOUSING PROJECTS $ 569,978 $ 800,558 $ 608,827 $ 1,106,837 $ 516,832 $ 1,539,081 Total 270 -- COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND $ 953,856 $ 1,232,158 $ 835,619 $ 1,265,149 $ 564,762 $ 1,596,318 Fund 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRALLA
4300 PROPERTY MGMT $ 51,997 $ 46,891 $ 79,449 $ 55,908 $ - $ 55,000 4310 HOUSING PROJECTS $ 631 $ 261 $ 262 $ - $ 33 $ -
Total 274 -- HOME GRANT 1992 FUND-CASA DE LA ESTRA $ 52,627 $ 47,152 $ 79,711 $ 55,908 $ 33 $ 55,000 Fund 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND
3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION $ (301,604) $ 41,374 $ 519,910 $ 481,151 $ 313,880 $ 698,770 3153 SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE $ 2,171,460 $ 2,517,951 $ 2,419,988 $ 2,600,772 $ 2,469,927 $ 2,618,211 Total 279 -- SEWER LINE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 1,869,855 $ 2,559,325 $ 2,939,899 $ 3,081,922 $ 2,783,807 $ 3,316,981 Fund 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND
3121 ENGINEERING DESIGN SECTION $ 503,667 $ 696,833 $ 605,761 $ 1,302,067 $ 351,539 $ 589,543 3155 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE $ 473,899 $ 491,358 $ 542,752 $ 729,810 $ 389,274 $ 706,046 Total 280 -- STORM WATER UTILITY FUND $ 977,566 $ 1,188,191 $ 1,148,512 $ 2,031,877 $ 740,813 $ 1,295,589 Fund 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS
2530 FIRE - OPERATIONS $ 108,763 $ 124,490 $ 93,050 $ 123,500 $ 88,444 $ - 2540 FIRE - TRAINING $ 2,409 $ - $ 4,684 $ 27,500 $ 6,612 $ 37,500 Total 291 -- PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING & SVCS $ 111,172 $ 124,490 $ 97,733 $ 151,000 $ 95,056 $ 37,500 Fund 292 -- ASSET SEIZURE FUND
2120 PATROL DIVISION $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 292 -- ASSET SEIZURE FUND $ 10,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Fund 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND
5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER $ - $ - $ - $ 12,500 $ 11,528 $ 12,500 Total 299 -- SR CTR PROGRAMS - GARDNER FUND $ - $ - $ - $ 12,500 $ 11,528 $ 12,500 Fund 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND
7012 DEBT SERVICE - LEASE REV.BONDS $ 545,566 $ 541,635 $ 542,316 $ 542,416 $ 542,416 $ 546,936 Total 310 -- DEBT SERVICE FUND $ 545,566 $ 541,635 $ 542,316 $ 542,416 $ 542,416 $ 546,936 Fund 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION
3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP $ 16,654 $ 410 $ - $ 1,827,045 $ - $ - Total 408 -- CONFERENCE CENTER RENOVATION $ 16,654 $ 410 $ - $ 1,827,045 $ - $ - Fund 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP $ 12,262,950 $ 13,063,511 $ 18,542,605 $ 78,103,137 $ 13,966,329 $ - ZZ99 CIP CONTRA EXP./FIXED ASSETS $ (1,755,538) $ (5,479,337) $ (2,041,089) $ - $ - $ - Total 410 -- CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND $ 10,507,411 $ 7,584,175 $ 16,501,516 $ 78,103,137 $ 13,966,329 $ - Fund 600 -- MARINA FUND
3310 MARINA ADMINISTRATION $ (699,276) $ 909,984 $ 1,033,745 $ 1,003,655 $ 673,550 $ 1,089,857 3320 MARINA MAINTENANCE $ 1,607,487 $ 3,783,609 $ 2,004,529 $ 1,178,510 $ 668,374 $ 1,120,772 3330 MARINA SECURITY $ 373,237 $ 431,117 $ 421,663 $ 469,623 $ 346,503 $ 443,001 7014 DEBT SERVICE - LOANS $ 52,523 $ 40,246 $ 27,416 $ 325,329 $ - $ - Total 600 -- MARINA FUND $ 1,333,971 $ 5,164,955 $ 3,487,353 $ 2,977,118 $ 1,688,428 $ 2,653,630 Fund 610 -- CEMETERY FUND
5240 PAY LOCATION/CEMETERY $ 361,311 $ 602,404 $ 542,161 $ 623,814 $ 461,959 $ 788,709 Total 610 -- CEMETERY FUND $ 361,311 $ 602,404 $ 542,161 $ 623,814 $ 461,959 $ 788,709 Fund 625 -- PARKING FUND
3510 PARKING ADMINISTRATION $ 2,290,260 $ 1,360,597 $ 2,009,729 $ 2,938,798 $ 2,052,002 $ 3,074,228 3520 PARKING ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM $ 303,754 $ (456,652) $ 2,199,924 $ 2,438,467 $ 1,914,185 $ 3,213,260 3530 PARKING MAINTENANCE PROGRAM $ (1,539,425) $ 3,163,043 $ 2,238,649 $ 2,772,451 $ 1,796,974 $ 2,626,080 3540 ATTENDANT/CASHIER/SECURITY $ 859,883 $ 852,221 $ 804,760 $ 1,274,425 $ 672,813 $ 1,010,289 5210 PARKS $ 102,323 $ 102,027 $ 118,476 $ 153,705 $ 100,652 $ 179,123 7012 DEBT SERVICE - LEASE REV.BONDS $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 7014 DEBT SERVICE - LOANS $ 188,608 $ 140,140 $ 89,492 $ 849,107 $ 849,107 $ - Total 625 -- PARKING FUND $ 2,805,403 $ 5,461,375 $ 7,761,030 $ 10,726,953 $ 7,385,733 $ 10,402,980 Fund 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY
3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION $ (1,062,344) $ 107,157 $ 109,947 $ - $ - $ - Total 641 -- MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY $ (1,062,344) $ 107,157 $ 109,947 $ - $ - $ - Fund 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD
1110 FINANCE ADMINISTRATION $ - $ 390 $ 190 $ 8,300 $ 140 $ 8,300 Total 642 -- OCEAN VIEW PLAZA CSD $ - $ 390 $ 190 $ 8,300 $ 140 $ 8,300 Fund 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS
3110 PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION $ 2,010,900 $ 2,181,469 $ 2,369,367 $ 1,408,329 $ 1,874,802 $ 1,461,465 3151 STREET MAINTENANCE & UTILITIES $ 306,371 $ 283,520 $ 325,813 $ 422,803 $ 304,620 $ 462,440 3152 BUILDING MAINTENANCE $ 5,226,744 $ 5,516,706 $ 5,601,253 $ 8,549,164 $ 5,279,280 $ 8,262,748 3155 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE $ 67,894 $ 54,879 $ 59,871 $ 84,765 $ 54,662 $ 196,201 3158 SEASIDE PASSTHROUGH $ 899,939 $ 1,289,989 $ 1,287,808 $ 1,200,000 $ 857,956 $ 1,200,000 3159 PROJECT ENGINEERING & ADMIN $ 292,276 $ 269,724 $ 415,727 $ 433,277 $ 292,865 $ 439,722 3161 DEFENSE MANPOWER DATA CENTER $ 287,418 $ 239,797 $ 277,553 $ 618,236 $ 552,091 $ 645,885 3163 USASA CAMP ROBERTS $ 990,542 $ 1,105,037 $ 1,131,517 $ 1,664,163 $ 916,589 $ 1,654,157 3164 NAVAL RESEARCH LAB CAMP ROBERTS $ 243,847 $ 178,383 $ 171,571 $ 499,856 $ 228,644 $ 530,228 3165 REFUSE CONTRACTS $ 1,063,365 $ 645,876 $ 638,896 $ 900,000 $ 700,671 $ 900,000 3199 PROJECT ACCOUNTING ROLL-UP $ 5,897,330 $ 4,057,473 $ 3,259,056 $ 13,369,264 $ 2,545,925 $ 12,848,565 3210 PARKS $ 166,116 $ 205,932 $ 212,563 $ 291,447 $ 216,894 $ 290,164 Total 650 -- PRESIDIO OF MTRY PUBLIC WORKS $ 17,452,743 $ 16,028,784 $ 15,750,994 $ 29,441,303 $ 13,825,000 $ 28,891,575 Fund 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND
3165 REFUSE CONTRACTS $ 306,647 $ 254,570 $ 212,074 $ 330,000 $ 185,254 $ 330,000 Total 655 -- NAVY SERVICES FUND $ 306,647 $ 254,570 $ 212,074 $ 330,000 $ 185,254 $ 330,000 Fund 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
1130 ACCOUNTING DIVISION $ 1,064,909 $ 895,600 $ 947,095 $ 1,840,848 $ 1,043,458 $ 1,527,000 7014 DEBT SERVICE - LOANS $ 15,413 $ 7,563 $ 103,219 $ 641,063 $ 373,999 $ 608,921 Total 705 -- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND $ 1,080,321 $ 903,163 $ 1,050,314 $ 2,481,910 $ 1,417,457 $ 2,135,921 Fund 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND
3154 VEHICLE MANAGEMENT $ 558,970 $ 2,968,476 $ 2,929,847 $ 3,296,016 $ 2,299,057 $ 3,236,856 3156 COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS STATION $ 395 $ 298 $ 348 $ 500 $ 372 $ 500 Total 708 -- VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FUND $ 559,365 $ 2,968,774 $ 2,930,195 $ 3,296,516 $ 2,299,429 $ 3,237,356 Fund 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND
0340 INFORMATION SERVICES $ 1,568,354 $ 5,213,916 $ 5,971,564 $ 7,282,558 $ 4,975,623 $ 8,147,694 Total 710 -- INFORMATION SERVICES FUND $ 1,568,354 $ 5,213,916 $ 5,971,564 $ 7,282,558 $ 4,975,623 $ 8,147,694 Fund 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST
0612 WORKERS' COMP INSURANCE $ 5,010,514 $ 4,965,538 $ 5,180,468 $ 4,126,122 $ 2,197,489 $ 3,704,644 Total 715 -- WORKER'S COMP INSURANCE TRUST $ 5,010,514 $ 4,965,538 $ 5,180,468 $ 4,126,122 $ 2,197,489 $ 3,704,644 Fund 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE
1143 RISK MANAGEMENT $ 3,109,640 $ 5,022,344 $ 4,114,952 $ 4,731,580 $ 3,617,068 $ 5,305,850 Total 716 -- LIABILITY & PROPERTY INSURANCE $ 3,109,640 $ 5,022,344 $ 4,114,952 $ 4,731,580 $ 3,617,068 $ 5,305,850 Fund 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 27, Packet Page 296 0614 SALARY CONTINUATION $ 169 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
0615 HEALTH INSURANCE $ 8,356,951 $ 8,534,213 $ 9,174,778 $ 9,661,635 $ 8,719,665 $ 10,267,535 0616 VISION INSURANCE $ 69,088 $ 5,500 $ 94,604 $ 80,835 $ 58,255 $ 80,835 0617 DENTAL INSURANCE $ 688,052 $ 750,431 $ 656,974 $ 735,835 $ 493,763 $ 735,835 0618 EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PLAN $ 28,862 $ 29,337 $ 31,577 $ 56,835 $ 37,296 $ 56,835 0619 LIFE INSURANCE $ 125,122 $ 118,304 $ 146,454 $ 148,835 $ 118,233 $ 148,835 0620 LONG TERM DISABILITY $ 243,959 $ 237,416 $ 304,390 $ 341,835 $ 255,675 $ 341,835 0622 UNEMPLOYMENT $ 71,228 $ 8,322 $ 16,403 $ 100,000 $ 28,154 $ 100,000 0623 NON-PAYROLL BENEFITS $ 83,742 $ 67,932 $ 64,066 $ 90,000 $ 65,667 $ 90,000 Total 718 -- EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUND $ 9,667,173 $ 9,751,455 $ 10,489,247 $ 11,215,810 $ 9,776,709 $ 11,821,710 Fund 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND
1120 REVENUE DIVISION $ 37,585 $ 48,804 $ 50,583 $ 56,790 $ 23,456 $ 49,765 2120 PATROL DIVISION $ 626,397 $ 449,053 $ 515,369 $ 73,460 $ 248,334 $ 73,460 2140 INVESTIGATIONS $ 4,447 $ 3,180 $ 3,264 $ - $ - $ - 2530 FIRE - OPERATIONS $ 79,170 $ 111,292 $ 175,567 $ 198,890 $ 153,156 $ 86,023 3410 HARBOR TIDELANDS ADMINISTRATION $ 964,689 $ 917,782 $ 1,064,722 $ 451,040 $ 334,576 $ 479,798 3420 HARBOR TIDELANDS MAINTENANCE $ 390,790 $ 438,806 $ 366,331 $ 535,652 $ 292,203 $ 549,052 3430 HARBOR TIDELANDS SECURITY $ 141,516 $ 159,886 $ 159,477 $ 209,474 $ 122,550 $ 210,661 3440 RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY $ 59,889 $ 87,543 $ 97,782 $ 199,295 $ 181,332 $ 120,468 4300 PROPERTY MGMT $ 615,075 $ 641,842 $ 599,652 $ 861,242 $ 523,328 $ 878,561 5210 PARKS $ 36,633 $ 44,299 $ 37,489 $ 53,476 $ 22,244 $ 31,885 9020 TIDELANDS TRUST $ 350,676 $ 350,676 $ 314,184 $ 341,763 $ 256,322 $ 355,434 Total 807 -- TIDELANDS TRUST FUND $ 3,306,867 $ 3,253,164 $ 3,384,420 $ 2,981,082 $ 2,157,500 $ 2,835,107 Fund 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND
5510 LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION $ 105,599 $ 159,675 $ 102,062 $ 84,778 $ 32,000 $ 65,310 5520 SUPPORT SERVICES $ 30,881 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
5530 REFERENCE SERVICES $ 14,614 $ 1,583 $ 191,716 $ 114,680 $ 65,220 $ 155,000 5540 YOUTH SERVICES $ 26,261 $ 25,089 $ 223,930 $ - $ - $ - 5550 READERS' SERVICES $ 1,421 $ 5,633 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total 810 -- LIBRARY TRUST FUND $ 178,775 $ 191,979 $ 517,708 $ 199,458 $ 97,220 $ 220,310 Fund 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND
5610 MUSEUM $ 1,905 $ 22,661 $ 18,261 $ 122,150 $ 25,242 $ 52,150 Total 818 -- MUSEUM TRUST FUND $ 1,905 $ 22,661 $ 18,261 $ 122,150 $ 25,242 $ 52,150 Fund 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1
7013 DEBT SERVICE-SPECIAL ASSMTS $ 3,970,236 $ 5,663,013 $ 5,972,327 $ 3,982,516 $ 5,486,089 $ 3,709,107 Total 918 -- CONF CTR FACILITIES DIST 2013-1 $ 3,970,236 $ 5,663,013 $ 5,972,327 $ 3,982,516 $ 5,486,089 $ 3,709,107 Fund 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND
5122 RECREATION - SCHOLZE PARK CENTER $ - $ - $ 7,587 $ 11,200 $ 574 $ 11,200 Total 961 -- GOLDEN 55 TRAVELERS FUND $ - $ - $ 7,587 $ 11,200 $ 574 $ 11,200 Fund GFA -- GENERAL FIXED ASSET GROUP
9110 NON-DEPARTMENTAL $ 5,457,538 $ 5,613,972 $ 5,816,181 $ - $ - $ - Total GFA -- GENERAL FIXED ASSET GROUP $ 5,457,538 $ 5,613,972 $ 5,816,181 $ - $ - $ - Total $ 151,014,130 $ 175,773,228 $ 193,032,482 $ 309,941,266 $ 161,007,633 $ 212,558,288 Run: 5/18/2025 11:53 AM

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 28, Packet Page 297

FIVE-YEAR

FORECAST
FY 2025-26 OPERATING BUDGET

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 29, Packet Page 298 General Fund*
FY 2025-26
Proposed
FY 2026-27
Projected
FY 2027-28
Projected
FY 2028-29
Projected
FY 2029-30
Projected
FY 2030-31
Projected
Revenue $110,205,572 $115,715,852 $121,501,645 $127,576,727 $133,955,563 $140,653,341Expenditure ($120,663,605) ($124,975,040) ($127,401,629) ($132,327,105) ($135,743,883) ($140,830,667)Over/(Under) ($10,458,033) ($9,259,188) ($5,899,985) ($4,750,378) ($1,788,320) ($177,326)Transfer In $1,365,423 $1,405,219 $1,446,402 $1,489,021 $1,533,128 $1,578,778Transfer Out ($1,471,936) ($615,682) ($619,041) ($621,626) ($618,437) ($614,668)Net Transfer Over/(Under) ($106,513) $789,537 $827,361 $867,395 $914,691 $964,110 Operating Surplus/(Deficit) ($10,564,546) ($8,469,651) ($5,072,624) ($3,882,983) ($873,629) $786,784 *Includes Fund 105 - Facility Maintanence Fund
FIVE YEAR FORECAST: FY 2025-26 THROUGH FY 2030-31*

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 30, Packet Page 299

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT

PROJECTS
FY 2025-26 OPERATING BUDGET

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 31, Packet Page 300 Project Title/Description Project # Fund
Funding Prior to
FY 2025-26
Total FY 2025-26
Funding
Total Funding
Identified
Life of Project
Total Spent (as of
April 23, 2025)
Monterey Sports Center Boiler Replacements** New in FY 2025-26 General Fund $ - $ 650,000 $ 650,000 $ - Cass and El Dorado St. Curb Ramp and Road Rehab. New in FY 2025-26 Road Maintenance and
Rehab (SB1) $ - $ 90,779 $ 90,779 $ -
Programmatic Wharf Inspections & Maint. New in FY 2025-26 Tidelands Fund $ - $ 350,000 $ 350,000 $ - Calle Principal Garage Repairs and Upgrades New in FY 2025-26 Parking Fund $ - $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ - Cannery Row Garage Repairs and Upgrades New in FY 2025-26 Parking Fund $ - $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ - Downtown East Garage Repairs and Upgrades New in FY 2025-26 Parking Fund $ - $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ - Downtown West Garage Repairs and Upgrades New in FY 2025-26 Parking Fund $ - $ 275,000 $ 275,000 $ - Library Parking Lot Repairs New in FY 2025-26 Parking Fund $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ - Parking Office Repairs and Upgrades New in FY 2025-26 Parking Fund $ - $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ - Lake El Estero Multi-Use Path New in FY 2025-26 Measure X $ - $ 800,000 $ 800,000 $ - Total Capital Requirements per Fund $ - $ 3,240,779 $ 3,240,779 $ - Project Title/Description Project # Fund
Funding Prior to
FY 2025-26
Total FY 2025-26
Funding
Total Funding
Identified
Life of Project
Total Spent (as of
April 23, 2025)
Monterey Sports Center Repairs and Upgrades CIP2304 General Fund $ 1,755,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,955,000 $ 302,496 Tunnel Maintenance & Repair CIP2412
Gas Tax (Highway User Tax -
HUTA) $ 881,392 $ 863,942 $ 1,745,334 $ 550
Sewer Root Foaming 33c1501 Sewer Fund $ 480,000 $ 100,000 $ 580,000 $ 480,000 Sewer Repair and Rehab. 33c1750 Sewer Fund $ 6,440,642 $ 500,000 $ 6,940,642 $ 5,136,730 Sewer Line Video Evaluation 33c1805 Sewer Fund $ 1,500,000 $ 300,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 1,159,574 Parking ADA Upgrades CIP2507 Parking Fund $ 300,000 $ 250,000 $ 550,000 $ - Measure S - Storm Drains 33c1554 Measure S $ 8,300,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 9,300,000 $ 5,585,501 Measure S - Sidewalks 35c1552 Measure S $ 10,320,000 $ 800,000 $ 11,120,000 $ 7,119,208 Measure S - Pavement 35c1553 Measure S $ 63,262,814 $ 6,639,481 $ 69,902,295 $ 56,879,507 Measure S - ADA 35c1555 Measure S $ 22,129,143 $ 7,314,300 $ 29,443,443 $ 12,520,995 Multi-Modal Plan Implementation CIP2509 Measure X $ 200,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 62,652 Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bicycle & Pedestrian
Improvement Project CIP2511 Measure X $ 100,000 $ 391,547 $ 491,547 $ - Calle Principal Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project CIP2320 Measure X $ 904,918 $ 200,000 $ 1,104,918 $ - Total Capital Requirements per Fund $ 116,573,909 $ 18,659,270 $ 135,233,179 $ 89,247,212 GRAND TOTAL $ 116,573,909 $ 21,900,049 $ 138,473,958 $ 89,247,212 *Funded by Fund 105 - Facility Maintenance Fund
**Will utilize funds from the Sports Center Reserve Fund CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - NEW IN FY 2025-26
ONGOING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS - ADDITIONAL FUNDING IN FY 2025-26 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 32, Packet Page 301

INTERFUND TRANSFERS,
DEBT SERVICE, and

RESERVES
FY 2025-26 OPERATING BUDGET

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 33, Packet Page 302 Loan REPAYMENT FROM REPAYMENT TO

PAY-OFF
DATE

INITIAL LOAN
AMOUNT
FY 2025-26

PAYMENT
(PRINCIPAL
AND

INTEREST)

YEAR END

BALANCE
Fire Truck Debt Service 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 7/1/2027 $356,500 $17,825 $19,310Fire Truck Loan #1 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 12/31/2030 705,000 $141,000 564,000 Fire Truck Loan #2 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 12/31/2032 1,719,371 $245,624 1,473,747 Fire Truck Loan #3 101 - General Fund 705 - Equipment Replacement 12/31/2031 980,438 $163,406 817,032 Settlement Funding 716 - Liab. and Prop. Ins. Fund 807 - Tidelands Fund 12/1/2028 2,000,000 220,000 600,000 Cemetery Columbarium 610 - Cemetery Fund 101 - General Fund 6/30/2027 879,383 100,000 159,383 INTERFUND LOAN TOTAL $6,640,692 $887,856 $3,633,471
Loan REPAYMENT FROM REPAYMENT TO

PAY-OFF
DATE

INITIAL LOAN
AMOUNT
FY 2025-26

PAYMENT
(PRINCIPAL
AND

INTEREST)

YEAR END

BALANCE
2013 Financing Agreement 310 - Debt Service Fund Capital One Public Fundng 5/1/2032 $7,170,000 $546,936 $2,860,0002017 PG&E Financing Loan 101 - General Fund PG&E 12/1/2027 97,035 $9,704 14,555 Fire Truck Loan #1 705 - Equipment Replacement Banc of America 12/1/2029 705,000 $80,240 305,000 Fire Truck Loan #2 705 - Equipment Replacement Banc of America 12/20/2029 1,719,371 $305,709 994,620 Fire Truck Loan #3 705 - Equipment Replacement Banc of America 12/30/2029 980,438 $222,949 616,281 Conference Center Bond 918 - Conf. Center Facilties Dist. PNC Bank 12/1/2034 50,000,000 $3,678,327 22,560,452 Sewer Loan #110 279 - Sewerline Maint. Fund State Water Resources 8/30/2035 3,352,782 $215,796 1,928,302 Sewer Loan #120 279 - Sewerline Maint. Fund State Water Resources 3/12/2038 10,872,248 670,583 7,048,290 EXTERNAL LOAN TOTAL $74,896,874 $5,730,244 $36,327,500GRAND TOTAL $81,537,566 $6,618,100 $39,960,971FY 2025-26 INTER-FUND LOAN SUMMARY (Advance To/From Funds)FY 2025-26 EXTERNAL LOAN SUMMARY (Principal & Interest)

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 34, Packet Page 303 Reserve Fund
7/1/2024 Beginning
Balance
FY 2024-25 Contributions
(Revised)
FY 2024-25 Uses (as of
5/30/2025)
6/30/2025 End Balance -
7/1/2025 Beginning
Balance (Projected)
FY 2025-26
Contributions FY 2025-26 Uses
6/30/2026 End Balance
(Projected)
Economic Uncertainty Reserve $20,276,870 $2,440,807 $ - $22,717,677 $1,415,044 $ - $24,132,721 Conference Center Reserve $2,588,739 $375,000 $ - $2,963,739 $375,000 ($125,998) $3,212,741 Sport Center Facility Reserve $2,500,000 $250,000 ($250,000) $2,500,000 $250,000 ($775,998) $1,974,002 Pension Liability Reserve $6,000,000 $500,000 $ - $6,500,000 $500,000 ($1,762,656) $5,237,344 Technology Infrastructure Reserve $1,910,000 $545,000 $ - $2,455,000 $584,848 ($1,169,696) $1,870,152 City Facilities Reserve $850,000 $125,000 $ - $975,000 $125,000 $ - $1,100,000 Public Safety Facility and Maint. Reserve $250,000 $125,000 $ - $375,000 $125,000 $ - $500,000 Library Facility and Maint. Reserve $250,000 $125,000 $ - $375,000 $125,000 $ - $500,000 TOTAL $34,625,609 $4,485,807 ($250,000) $38,861,416 $3,499,892 ($3,834,348) $38,526,960 Reserve Fund
7/1/2024 Beginning
Balance FY 2024-25 Contributions
FY 2024-25 Uses (as of
5/30/2025)
6/30/2025 End Balance -
7/1/2025 Beginning
Balance (Projected)
FY 2025-26
Contributions FY 2025-26 Uses
6/30/2026 End Balance
(Projected)
Parking Facilities Reserve (Parking Fund) $250,000 $250,000 $ - $500,000 $2,950,000 $ - $3,450,000 of which, annual contribution $250,000 $ -
of which, one-time transfer from unresticted fund balance $2,700,000 $ - Sea Level Rise Fund Reserve (Tidelands Fund) $500,000 $250,000 $ - $750,000 $250,000 $ - $1,000,000 TOTAL $500,000 $250,000 $ - $750,000 $2,950,000 $ - $1,000,000 GENERAL FUND RESERVES - CONTRIBUTIONS AND USES (FY 2024-25 REVISED AND FY 2025-26 PROJECTED) SPECIAL REVENUE FUND RESERVES - CONTRIBUTIONS AND USES (FY 2024-25 AND FY 2025-26 PROJECTED) Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 35, Packet Page 304 Reserve Fund 2020 End Balance 2021 End Balance 2022 End Balance 2023 End Balance 2024 End
Balance
2025 End Balance
(Projected)
Total Net
Increase Since
FY 2019-20
Economic Uncertainty Reserve $ 13,746,207 $ 12,246,207 $ 14,756,207 $ 17,241,473 $ 20,276,870 $ 22,717,677 $ 8,971,470 Conference Center Reserve $ 88,739 $ 88,739 $ 838,739 $ 1,838,739 $ 2,588,739 $ 2,963,739 $ 2,875,000 Sport Center Facility Reserve $ - $ - $ 750,000 $ 1,750,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 Pension Liability Reserve $ - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 4,000,000 $ 6,000,000 $ 6,500,000 $ 6,500,000 Technology Infrastructure Reserve $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 1,910,000 $ 2,455,000 $ 2,455,000 City Facilities Reserve $ - $ - $ - $ 600,000 $ 850,000 $ 975,000 $ 975,000 Public Safety Facility and Maint. Reserve $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 375,000 $ 375,000 Library Facility and Maint. Reserve $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 375,000 $ 375,000 Total $ 13,834,946 $ 12,334,946 $ 18,844,946 $ 27,930,212 $ 34,625,609 $ 38,861,416 $ 25,026,470 Reserve Fund 2020 End Balance 2021 End Balance 2022 End Balance 2023 End Balance 2024 End
Balance
2025 End Balance
(Projected)
Total Net
Increase Since
FY 2019-20
Parking Facilities Reserve (Parking Fund) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Sea Level Rise Fund Reserve (Tidelands Fund) $ - $ - $ - $ 250,000 $ 500,000 $ 750,000 $ 750,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $750,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000
GENERAL FUND RESERVES HISTORY - FY 2019-2020 THROUGH FY 2024-25 GENERAL FUND RESERVES HISTORY - FY 2019-2020 THROUGH FY 2024-25 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 36, Packet Page 305 MONTEREY.ORG

EXHIBIT A - PRELIMINARY BUDGET BOOK
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 37, Packet Page 306 CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT Administration
Community
Resources/
Education City Clerk Total Allocation
Fund 101 0210 0211 0321

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 2.00

0.83 0.83

1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total City Manager Dept 3.83 1.00 2.00 6.83
Conference Center Administration Sales
Event
Operations Maintenance Total Allocation
Fund 101 6210 6220 6231 6232
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Custodian 1.75 1.75

1.00 1.00
Event Coordinator 2.00 2.00

2.50 2.50
Operations Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Senior Facility Attendant 1.00 1.00
Senior Craftsworker 1.00 1.00
HVAC Senior Tech 1.00 1.00
Total Conference Center 2.00 1.00 9.25 2.00 14.25

INFORMATION RESOURCES

DEPARTMENT
Information
Resources Total Allocation
Fund 710 0340

1.00 1.00

0.17 0.17

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Senior Information Tech Specialist 1.00 1.00
IT Application Engineer II 4.00 4.00

1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 0.75 0.75
Total Information Services Dept 11.92 11.92

CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT
City Attorney
Administration Total Allocation
Fund 101 0500

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total City Attorney Dept 4.00 4.00
HUMAN RESOURCES Administration (1)
Workers' Comp/
Employee
Benefits(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/715(2) 0600 0612

1.00 1.00 2.00
Senior Human Resource Analyst 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Assistant 1.00 1.00
Assistant HR Director 0.50 0.50 1.00

0.75 0.25 1.00
Human Resources Specialist 2.00 2.00
City Clerk
Conference Center General Mgr
Sales Coordinator
Facility Attendant
Operations Supervisor
Chief Information Officer

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Communications Manager
Administrative Assistant
Assistant City Manager
City Manager
City Attorney
Deputy City Attorney
Legal Secretary
Human Resources Analyst
Human Resources Director
Assistant City Manager
GEO Info System (GIS) Coordinator
Network Engineer II
Information Technology Specialist
Systems & Network Administrator
Assistant City Attorney
EXHIBIT B - FY 2025-26 POSITION CONTROL LIST
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 38, Packet Page 307 Total Human Resources Dept 6.25 1.75 8.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance (1) Revenue Accounting Revenue(2) Risk
Management (3) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/807(2)/716(3) 1110 1120 1130 1120 1143

1.00 3.50 4.50
Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.70 2.00 0.30 4.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Business License Inspector 1.00 1.00

0.00 1.00 1.00

0.75 0.25 1.00
Finance Manager 1.00 1.00 2.00
Purchasing Analyst 1.00 1.00
Risk Specialist 1.00 1.00
Risk Manager 1.00 1.00
Total Finance Dept 1.75 5.70 9.50 0.30 2.25 19.50
POLICE DEPARTMENT Administration Field Operations Support Investigations/
Community
Services Total Allocation
Fund 101 2110 2120 2130 2140
Assistant Police Chief 1.00 1.00
Homeless Navigator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Police Officer 34.00 5.00 39.00

7.00 2.00 9.00

2.00 1.00 3.00
Community Service Officer 2.00 2.00

1.00 2.00 3.00
Police Services Technician 8.00 8.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00
Total Police Dept 5.00 45.00 14.00 8.00 72.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT Administration
Fire Prevention
& Emerg.

Preparedness Fire Operations Fire Training Total Allocation Fund 101 2510 2520 2530 2540

2.00 2.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Fire Inspector II 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00 4.00
Fire Captain 21.00 21.00

24.00 24.00

33.00 33.00

1.00 1.00
Total Fire Dept 6.00 2.00 81.00 1.00 90.00
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Administration(1)
Neighborhood
Improvement
Fund Admin(2)
Presidio Maint.

Admin(3) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/216(2)/650(3) 3110 3110 3110

1.00 1.00
Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00

0.50 0.10 0.60
Senior Engineer 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Accountant/Auditor
Police Lieutenant
Police Services Assistant
Police Records/Detention Supervisor
Senior Administrative Analyst
Senior Police Services Technician
Assistant Fire Chief
Accounting Specialist
Assistant Finance Director
Finance Analyst
Finance Director
Police Chief
Police Sergeant
Senior Adminstrative Analyst
Accounting Specialist
Deputy PW Director/Admin
Executive Assistant
Fire Chief
Fire Prevention Technician
Deputy Fire Marshal
Division Chief
Fire Engineer
Firefighter
EXHIBIT B - FY 2025-26 POSITION CONTROL LIST
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 39, Packet Page 308

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Administration 4.50 1.00 2.10 7.60
Engineering Engineering(1)
Sewer Line
MaintenanceEngineering(2)
Storm Drain
Engineering(3)
Presidio Proj
Engineering &
Admin(4) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/279(2)/280(3)/650(4) 3121 3121 3121 3159

2.00 2.00

2.85 0.15 2.00 5.00

1.00 1.00

0.50 0.20 0.20 0.90

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Engineering Project Manager 2.00 1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.40 0.30 0.30 3.00
Senior Project Manager 1.00 1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.42 0.58 2.00

0.14 0.86 1.00
Total Engineering 17.75 1.21 1.94 4.00 24.90
Vehicle Management -Mechanical Mechanical Total Allocation Fund 708 3154

5.00 5.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Vehicle Mgmt.-Mechanical 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 Building Maintenance
Building
Maintenance(1)
Presidio Maint.

Bldgs(2)
Presidio Camp
Roberts(2)
Presidio Naval
Research(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2) 3152 3152 3163 3164

1.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 16.00

1.00 3.00 4.00

0.15 0.85 1.00

0.25 0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

4.00 1.00 5.00

1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00
General Srvc Field Oper Manager 0.25 0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 5.00 6.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Building Maintenance 5.65 37.35 5.00 2.00 50.00
Streets/Sewer/Stormdrain
Maintenance Maintenance(1)
Presidio Maint.

Streets(2)
Sewer
Maintenance(3)
Storm Drain
Maintenance(4)
Presidio Maint.

Streets(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2)/279(3)/280(4) 3151 3151 3153 3155 3155

0.30 0.20 0.30 0.20 1.00

0.49 0.40 0.11 1.00

1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 1.00

0.74 1.00 0.13 0.13 2.00

2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 6.00

1.00 1.00 2.00
Total Streets 6.53 2.20 5.83 2.31 17.00
Senior Administrative Analyst
Engineering Technician
Engineering Programs Analyst
Public Works Inspector
Senior Engineer
Senior Public Works Inspector
Environmental Reg. Analyst
Public Works Director
Administrative Assistant
Associate Civil Engineer
City Traffic Engineer
Deputy PW Director/City Engineer
Engineering Assistant II
Electrician
General Srvc Superintendent
Admin Services Technician
Management Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Building Maintenance Supervisor
Environmental Reg. Manager
Automotive Mechanic
Parts Clerk
Fleet Manager
Lead Mechanic
Building Maintenance Craftsworker
Senior Parts Clerk
Streets & Utilities Operations Manag
Administrative Assistant
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Sign Craftsworker
Street Maintenance Leadworker
Building Maintenance Worker
Facilities Maintenance Coordinator
Historic Facilities Sr. Craftsworker
HVAC Senior Technician
Senior Craftsworker
Senior Locksmith
Street Maintenance Worker
Street & Utilities Supervisor
EXHIBIT B - FY 2025-26 POSITION CONTROL LIST
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 40, Packet Page 309 Custodial Services Custodial Total Allocation
Fund 101 3172

7.00 7.00
Lead Custodian 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Total Custodial Services 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 Marina/Harbor Administration(1) Maintenance(1) Security(1) Administration(2) Maintenance(2) Security(2) Total Allocation Fund 600(1)/807(2) 3310 3320 3330 3410 3420/3440 3430

0.50 0.50 1.00
Harbor Coordinator 1.00 1.00 2.00

1.50 1.50

0.10 0.10 0.20

0.80 0.20 1.00

1.50 1.50 3.00

2.77 0.98 3.75
Total Marina/Harbor 2.40 1.50 2.77 1.80 3.00 0.98 12.45 Parking Administration Enforcement Maintenance Parking Services Total Allocation Fund 625 3510 3520 3530 3540

2.75 2.75

1.00 1.00

0.75 0.75
Assistant Parking Superintendent 1.00 1.00

0.20 0.20

1.00 1.00

8.00 8.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

4.00 4.00

0.50 0.50 1.00

4.50 4.50

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Parking 7.20 10.00 9.00 6.00 32.20
Community Development Department Planning
Building Safety
& Inspection Total Allocation
Fund 101 4400 4410

2.00 1.75 3.75
Accountant/Auditor 0.50 0.50
Assistant Planner 1.00 1.00

0.60 0.60
Economic Development Manager 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Planning Manager 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Community Development 14.10 6.75 20.85
Housing & Property Management Property Mgmt(1)
Property
Mgmt(2)
Housing
Admin(1) Housing Admin(3)
Housing
Admin(4)
Housing
Projects(4) Total Allocation
Deputy PW Director/Admin
Marina Harbor Assistant
Harbor Maintenance Craftsworker
Harbor Security Worker
Accounting Assistant
Accounting Specialist
Administrative Assistant
Custodian
Senior Custodian
Harbormaster
Facility Attendant (RPT)
Deputy PW Director/Admin
Parking Maintenance Leadworker
Parking Maintenance Worker
Parking Services Coordinator
Parking Services Representative
Parking Services Specialist
Senior Parking Controls Technician
Parking Superintendent
Parking Enforcement Officer
Parking Enforcement Supervisor
Senior Parking Enforcement Off.

Parking Controls Technician
Parking Maintenance Supervisor
Sustainability Assistant
Plans Examiner
Building Technician
Chief Of Inspct Srvc/Bldg Off.

Senior Building Inspector
Inspector
Administrative Assistant
Community Development Director
Principal Planner
Senior Associate Planner
Code Compliance Coordinator
Sustainability Manager
EXHIBIT B - FY 2025-26 POSITION CONTROL LIST
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 41, Packet Page 310 Fund 101(1)/807(2)/268(3)/270(4)/274(5) 4300 4300 4305 4305 4305 4310

0.15 0.85 0.50 0.25 0.25 2.00

0.10 0.30 0.40

3.00 3.00
Housing Manager 1.00 1.00
Property Technician 1.00 1.00

0.15 0.85 1.00
Total Housing & Property Mgmt 1.40 2.00 4.50 0.00 0.25 0.25 8.40 Parks & Recreation Department Administration Total Allocation Recreation
Fund 101 5110

1.00 1.00
Management Analyst I 0.34 0.34

0.34 0.34

1.00 1.00
Recreation Supervisor 1.00 1.00
Total Recreation 3.68 3.68
Recreation Centers
El Estero Park
Center
Scholze Park
Center
Hilltop Park
Center
Special Programs
& Events Sports Total Allocation
Fund 101 5121 5122 5124 5130 5160

1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00
Sports Coordinator 1.00 1.00
Lead Preschool Instructor 0.75 0.75

0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00
Total Centers 1.50 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.50 6.75
Monterey Sports Center Operations Maintenance Total Allocation Fund 101 5180 5189

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Fitness Supervisor 1.00 1.00
Guest Service Specialist 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst I 0.33 0.33

0.33 0.33

1.00 1.00
Sports Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Sports Center 8.66 2.00 10.66
Parks Maintenance(1)
Presidio
Maintenance(2)
Street
Maintenance
District(3)
Vets Park / Urban
Forestry(1) Cemetery (4) Parking (5) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2)261-262(3)610(4)625(5) 5210 3210 5210 5220/5230 5240 5210

0.70 0.25 0.05 1.00
Management Analyst I 0.33 0.33

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Park Maintenance Leadworker 2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00
Park Maintenance Worker 10.10 0.40 0.50 1.00 12.00

0.80 0.03 0.15 0.02 1.00

0.33 0.33

2.00 2.00

0.50 1.50 2.00
Greenbelt Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Parks 18.26 0.53 0.40 3.90 2.57 1.00 26.66
Recreation Manager
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Specialist
Administrative Assistant
Aquatics Coordinator
Facility Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Community Development Director
HCD Coordinator - Projects/Prgm.

Property Manager
Administrative Assistant
Parks & Rec Director
Park Maintenance Craftsworker
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Park Operations Manager
Parks & Rec Director
Senior Park Maintenance Worker
Assistant Urban Forester
Parks & Rec Director
Sports Center Manager
Building Maintenance Craftsworker
Senior Craftsworker
Admin Services Technician
Park Attendant
Cemetery Coordinator
Cemetery Maintenance Worker
EXHIBIT B - FY 2025-26 POSITION CONTROL LIST
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 42, Packet Page 311 Museum Administration Total Allocation
Fund 101 5610
Artifact Specialist 1.00 1.00

0.25 0.25
Total Museum 1.25 1.25
LIBRARY Administration (1)
Reference
Services (1) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/810(2) 5510 5530

0.75 0.75
Assistant Library Director 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.75 0.75

4.50 4.50

1.00 1.00

4.00 4.00

1.00 1.00
Total Library 2.75 11.25 14.00
GRAND TOTAL 155.38 133.24 149.04 32.31 9.57 481.90 2.23 Library Assistant II
Technology Services Mgr
Librarian
Library Manager
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Assistant
Library Director
Library Assistant I
EXHIBIT B - FY 2025-26 POSITION CONTROL LIST
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 43, Packet Page 312 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№07/19
ADOPTING THE FY 2025/26 SALARY SCHEDULES FOR REGULAR FULL-TIME, REGULAR PART-TIME AND PART-TIME EMPLOYEES EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2025 WHEREAS, the Council has previously authorized the establishment of all employee classifications and salaries for regular full-time and regular part-time employees; WHEREAS, California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 570.5, and Government Code section 20636(b)(1), require governing bodies of local agencies contracting with CalPERS to adopt a publicly available pay schedule; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby adopts the FY 2025/26 salary schedule as reflected in Exhibit A effective July 1, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 44, Packet Page 313 City of Monterey
Full-Time Salary Schedule, Regular
Part-Time, and
Part-Time Hourly Schedule
FY 25/26
Effective: 07-01-25 to 06-30-26

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 45, Packet Page 314 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3310 ACCOUNTANT/AUDITOR ft gem Step: 1076 4,043.00 97,032.00 076 3310 ft gem Step: 2076 4,245.00 101,880.00
3310 ft gem Step: 3076 4,460.00 107,040.00
3310 ft gem Step: 4076 4,680.00 112,320.00
3310 ft gem Step: 5076 4,913.00 117,912.00
3313 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1268 2,624.00 62,976.00 268 3313 ft gem Step: 2268 2,755.00 66,120.00
3313 ft gem Step: 3268 2,893.00 69,432.00
3313 ft gem Step: 4268 3,038.00 72,912.00
3313 ft gem Step: 5268 3,192.00 76,608.00
3320 ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1285 3,139.00 75,336.00 285 3320 ft gem Step: 2285 3,294.00 79,056.00
3320 ft gem Step: 3285 3,456.00 82,944.00
3320 ft gem Step: 4285 3,631.00 87,144.00
3320 ft gem Step: 5285 3,813.00 91,512.00
1203 ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1015 4,088.00 98,112.00 015 1203 ft mea Step: 2015 4,295.00 103,080.00
1203 ft mea Step: 3015 4,508.00 108,192.00
1203 ft mea Step: 4015 4,734.00 113,616.00
1203 ft mea Step: 5015 4,971.00 119,304.00
3307 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1373 2,380.00 57,120.00 373 3307 ft gem Step: 2373 2,499.00 59,976.00
3307 ft gem Step: 3373 2,624.00 62,976.00
3307 ft gem Step: 4373 2,755.00 66,120.00
3307 ft gem Step: 5373 2,893.00 69,432.00
3307 ft gem Step: 6373 3,038.00 72,912.00
3307 ft gem Step: 7373 3,192.00 76,608.00
6112 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECH ft gem Step: 1731 3,129.00 75,096.00 731 6112 ft gem Step: 2731 3,287.00 78,888.00
6112 ft gem Step: 3731 3,449.00 82,776.00
6112 ft gem Step: 4731 3,622.00 86,928.00
6112 ft gem Step: 5731 3,805.00 91,320.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 1 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 46, Packet Page 315 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5303 AQUATICS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1114 3,482.00 83,568.00 114 5303 pt gem Step: 2114 3,656.00 87,744.00
5303 pt gem Step: 3114 3,840.00 92,160.00
5303 pt gem Step: 4114 4,031.00 96,744.00
5303 pt gem Step: 5114 4,233.00 101,592.00
5301 AQUATICS SPECIALIST II pt gem Step: 1302 2,271.00 54,504.00 302 5301 pt gem Step: 2302 2,384.00 57,216.00
5301 pt gem Step: 3302 2,503.00 60,072.00
5301 pt gem Step: 4302 2,627.00 63,048.00
5301 pt gem Step: 5302 2,758.00 66,192.00
5107 ARTIFACT SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1107 2,458.00 58,992.00 107 5107 ft gem Step: 2107 2,581.00 61,944.00
5107 ft gem Step: 3107 2,710.00 65,040.00
5107 ft gem Step: 4107 2,846.00 68,304.00
5107 ft gem Step: 5107 2,988.00 71,712.00
1207 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY pt mea Step: 1200 8,055.00 193,320.00 200 1207 pt mea Step: 2200 8,480.00 203,520.00
1207 pt mea Step: 3200 8,926.00 214,224.00
1207 pt mea Step: 4200 9,396.00 225,504.00
1207 pt mea Step: 5200 9,890.00 237,360.00
1122 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ft exec Step: 5010 10,821.00 259,704.00 010 1264 ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1263 6,853.00 164,472.00 263 1264 ft mea Step: 2263 7,196.00 172,704.00
1264 ft mea Step: 3263 7,556.00 181,344.00
1264 ft mea Step: 4263 7,933.00 190,392.00
1264 ft mea Step: 5263 8,331.00 199,944.00
2205 ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF ft fma Step: 1325 8,589.00 206,136.00 325 2205 ft fma Step: 2325 9,014.00 216,336.00
2205 ft fma Step: 3325 9,468.00 227,232.00
2205 ft fma Step: 4325 9,942.00 238,608.00
2205 ft fma Step: 5325 10,437.00 250,488.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 2 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 47, Packet Page 316 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1298 ASSISTANT HR DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1370 6,761.00 162,264.00 370 1298 ft mea Step: 2370 7,100.00 170,400.00
1298 ft mea Step: 3370 7,456.00 178,944.00
1298 ft mea Step: 4370 7,828.00 187,872.00
1298 ft mea Step: 5370 8,220.00 197,280.00
1205 ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR pt mea Step: 1016 5,664.00 135,936.00 016 1205 pt mea Step: 2016 5,947.00 142,728.00
1205 pt mea Step: 3016 6,244.00 149,856.00
1205 pt mea Step: 4016 6,556.00 157,344.00
1205 pt mea Step: 5016 6,884.00 165,216.00
3309 ASSISTANT PLANNER ft gem Step: 1180 3,234.00 77,616.00 180 3309 ft gem Step: 2180 3,396.00 81,504.00
3309 ft gem Step: 3180 3,565.00 85,560.00
3309 ft gem Step: 4180 3,743.00 89,832.00
3309 ft gem Step: 5180 3,930.00 94,320.00
6724 ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF ft plma Step: 1340 8,536.00 204,864.00 340 6724 ft plma Step: 2340 8,961.00 215,064.00
6724 ft plma Step: 3340 9,411.00 225,864.00
6724 ft plma Step: 4340 9,881.00 237,144.00
6724 ft plma Step: 5340 10,376.00 249,024.00
6722 ASSISTANT URBAN FORESTER pt gem Step: 1320 3,660.00 87,840.00 320 6722 pt gem Step: 2320 3,843.00 92,232.00
6722 pt gem Step: 3320 4,036.00 96,864.00
6722 pt gem Step: 4320 4,237.00 101,688.00
6722 pt gem Step: 5320 4,451.00 106,824.00
1208 ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1018 5,046.00 121,104.00 018 1208 ft mea Step: 2018 5,297.00 127,128.00
1208 ft mea Step: 3018 5,563.00 133,512.00
1208 ft mea Step: 4018 5,839.00 140,136.00
1208 ft mea Step: 5018 6,485.00 155,640.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 3 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 48, Packet Page 317 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4202 ASSOCIATE PLANNER ft gem Step: 1097 4,132.00 99,168.00 097 4202 ft gem Step: 2097 4,340.00 104,160.00
4202 ft gem Step: 3097 4,557.00 109,368.00
4202 ft gem Step: 4097 4,785.00 114,840.00
4202 ft gem Step: 5097 5,026.00 120,624.00
1290 ASST DIR OF INFO RESOURCES ft mea Step: 1357 6,415.00 153,960.00 357 1290 ft mea Step: 2357 6,736.00 161,664.00
1290 ft mea Step: 3357 7,074.00 169,776.00
1290 ft mea Step: 4357 7,428.00 178,272.00
1290 ft mea Step: 5357 7,799.00 187,176.00
1226 ASST PARKING SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1237 4,646.00 111,504.00 237 1226 ft mea Step: 2237 4,877.00 117,048.00
1226 ft mea Step: 3237 5,121.00 122,904.00
1226 ft mea Step: 4237 5,377.00 129,048.00
1226 ft mea Step: 5237 5,646.00 135,504.00
6301 AUTOMOTIVE MECHANIC rpt gem Step: 1132 3,241.00 77,784.00 132 6301 rpt gem Step: 2132 3,401.00 81,624.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 3132 3,577.00 85,848.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 4132 3,751.00 90,024.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 5132 3,941.00 94,584.00
6501 BUILDING MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1135 3,030.00 72,720.00 135 6501 ft gem Step: 2135 3,180.00 76,320.00
6501 ft gem Step: 3135 3,344.00 80,256.00
6501 ft gem Step: 4135 3,504.00 84,096.00
6501 ft gem Step: 5135 3,680.00 88,320.00
6502 BUILDING MAINT. SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1136 3,856.00 92,544.00 136 6502 ft gem Step: 2136 4,051.00 97,224.00
6502 ft gem Step: 3136 4,254.00 102,096.00
6502 ft gem Step: 4136 4,465.00 107,160.00
6502 ft gem Step: 5136 4,688.00 112,512.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 4 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 49, Packet Page 318 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6503 BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1137 2,318.00 55,632.00 137 6503 ft gem Step: 2137 2,434.00 58,416.00
6503 ft gem Step: 3137 2,555.00 61,320.00
6503 ft gem Step: 4137 2,683.00 64,392.00
6503 ft gem Step: 5137 2,817.00 67,608.00
6503 ft gem Step: 6137 2,957.00 70,968.00
6503 ft gem Step: 7137 3,105.00 74,520.00
4306 BUILDING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1196 3,667.00 88,008.00 196 4306 ft gem Step: 2196 3,850.00 92,400.00
4306 ft gem Step: 3196 4,046.00 97,104.00
4306 ft gem Step: 4196 4,246.00 101,904.00
4306 ft gem Step: 5196 4,462.00 107,088.00
3334 BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1247 3,401.00 81,624.00 247 3334 ft gem Step: 2247 3,577.00 85,848.00
3334 ft gem Step: 3247 3,751.00 90,024.00
3334 ft gem Step: 4247 3,941.00 94,584.00
3334 ft gem Step: 5247 4,134.00 99,216.00
6702 CEMETERY COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1157 3,482.00 83,568.00 157 6702 ft gem Step: 2157 3,656.00 87,744.00
6702 ft gem Step: 3157 3,840.00 92,160.00
6702 ft gem Step: 4157 4,031.00 96,744.00
6702 ft gem Step: 5157 4,233.00 101,592.00
6710 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1165 2,687.00 64,488.00 165 6710 ft gem Step: 2165 2,824.00 67,776.00
6710 ft gem Step: 3165 2,966.00 71,184.00
6710 ft gem Step: 4165 3,113.00 74,712.00
6710 ft gem Step: 5165 3,268.00 78,432.00
1300 CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ft mea Step: 1011 7,320.00 175,680.00 011 1300 ft mea Step: 2011 7,686.00 184,464.00
1300 ft mea Step: 3011 8,069.00 193,656.00
1300 ft mea Step: 4011 8,473.00 203,352.00
1300 ft mea Step: 5011 8,896.00 213,504.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 5 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 50, Packet Page 319 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1270 CHIEF OF INSPCT SRVC/BLDG OFF. ft mea Step: 1311 6,842.00 164,208.00 311 1270 ft mea Step: 2311 7,181.00 172,344.00
1270 ft mea Step: 3311 7,545.00 181,080.00
1270 ft mea Step: 4311 7,921.00 190,104.00
1270 ft mea Step: 5311 8,316.00 199,584.00
1104 CITY ATTORNEY pt exec Step: 5002 11,739.00 281,736.00 002 1221 CITY CLERK ft mea Step: 1031 5,291.00 126,984.00 031 1221 ft mea Step: 2031 5,620.00 134,880.00
1221 ft mea Step: 3031 5,952.00 142,848.00
1221 ft mea Step: 4031 6,281.00 150,744.00
1221 ft mea Step: 5031 6,612.00 158,688.00
1101 CITY MANAGER ft exec Step: 5001 12,685.00 304,440.00 001 1254 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER pt mea Step: 1050 6,415.00 153,960.00 050 1254 pt mea Step: 2050 6,736.00 161,664.00
1254 pt mea Step: 3050 7,074.00 169,776.00
1254 pt mea Step: 4050 7,428.00 178,272.00
1254 pt mea Step: 5050 7,799.00 187,176.00
4308 CODE COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1326 4,033.00 96,792.00 326 4308 ft gem Step: 2326 4,236.00 101,664.00
4308 ft gem Step: 3326 4,448.00 106,752.00
4308 ft gem Step: 4326 4,670.00 112,080.00
4308 ft gem Step: 5326 4,905.00 117,720.00
1299 COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1048 4,659.00 111,816.00 048 1299 ft mea Step: 2048 4,892.00 117,408.00
1299 ft mea Step: 3048 5,137.00 123,288.00
1299 ft mea Step: 4048 5,395.00 129,480.00
1299 ft mea Step: 5048 5,665.00 135,960.00
1110 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5006 9,447.00 226,728.00 006 General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 6 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 51, Packet Page 320 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6805 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ft gem Step: 1353 2,857.00 68,568.00 353 6805 ft gem Step: 2353 3,003.00 72,072.00
6805 ft gem Step: 3353 3,152.00 75,648.00
6805 ft gem Step: 4353 3,308.00 79,392.00
6805 ft gem Step: 5353 3,478.00 83,472.00
1266 CONFERENCE CENTER GENERAL MGR ft mea Step: 1303 6,060.00 145,440.00 303 1266 ft mea Step: 2303 6,364.00 152,736.00
1266 ft mea Step: 3303 6,681.00 160,344.00
1266 ft mea Step: 4303 7,018.00 168,432.00
1266 ft mea Step: 5303 7,364.00 176,736.00
1287 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1345 4,966.00 119,184.00 345 1287 ft mea Step: 2345 5,219.00 125,256.00
1287 ft mea Step: 3345 5,477.00 131,448.00
1287 ft mea Step: 4345 5,744.00 137,856.00
1287 ft mea Step: 5345 6,032.00 144,768.00
8101 COUNCIL MEMBER ft counc Step: 1301 482.63 11,583.12 301 6510 CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1143 2,056.00 49,344.00 143 6510 pt gem Step: 2143 2,161.00 51,864.00
6510 pt gem Step: 3143 2,268.00 54,432.00
6510 pt gem Step: 4143 2,380.00 57,120.00
6510 pt gem Step: 5143 2,503.00 60,072.00
1121 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY pt mea Step: 1732 6,803.00 163,272.00 732 1121 pt mea Step: 2732 7,143.00 171,432.00
1121 pt mea Step: 3732 7,501.00 180,024.00
1121 pt mea Step: 4732 7,875.00 189,000.00
1121 pt mea Step: 5732 8,269.00 198,456.00
2204 DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL pt mffa Step: 1209 5,546.00 133,104.00 209 2204 pt mffa Step: 2209 5,823.00 139,752.00
2204 pt mffa Step: 3209 6,116.00 146,784.00
2204 pt mffa Step: 4209 6,416.00 153,984.00
2204 pt mffa Step: 5209 6,738.00 161,712.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 7 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 52, Packet Page 321 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1294 DEPUTY PW DIRECTOR/ADMIN ft mea Step: 1017 6,415.00 153,960.00 017 1294 ft mea Step: 2017 6,736.00 161,664.00
1294 ft mea Step: 3017 7,074.00 169,776.00
1294 ft mea Step: 4017 7,428.00 178,272.00
1294 ft mea Step: 5017 7,799.00 187,176.00
1247 DEPUTY PW DIRECTOR/CITY ENGNR ft mea Step: 1046 6,804.00 163,296.00 046 1247 ft mea Step: 2046 7,144.00 171,456.00
1247 ft mea Step: 3046 7,501.00 180,024.00
1247 ft mea Step: 4046 7,873.00 188,952.00
1247 ft mea Step: 5046 8,269.00 198,456.00
1209 DIVISION CHIEF pt fma Step: 1019 7,326.00 175,824.00 019 1209 pt fma Step: 2019 7,693.00 184,632.00
1209 pt fma Step: 3019 8,079.00 193,896.00
1209 pt fma Step: 4019 8,481.00 203,544.00
1209 pt fma Step: 5019 8,906.00 213,744.00
1278 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1330 5,900.00 141,600.00 330 1278 ft mea Step: 2330 6,195.00 148,680.00
1278 ft mea Step: 3330 6,504.00 156,096.00
1278 ft mea Step: 4330 6,830.00 163,920.00
1278 ft mea Step: 5330 7,171.00 172,104.00
6203 ELECTRICIAN ft gem Step: 1124 3,650.00 87,600.00 124 6203 ft gem Step: 2124 3,832.00 91,968.00
6203 ft gem Step: 3124 4,026.00 96,624.00
6203 ft gem Step: 4124 4,226.00 101,424.00
6203 ft gem Step: 5124 4,437.00 106,488.00
6727 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1343 3,569.00 85,656.00 343 6727 ft gem Step: 2343 3,749.00 89,976.00
6727 ft gem Step: 3343 3,939.00 94,536.00
6727 ft gem Step: 4343 4,133.00 99,192.00
6727 ft gem Step: 5343 4,338.00 104,112.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 8 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 53, Packet Page 322 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6728 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1364 4,035.00 96,840.00 364 6728 ft gem Step: 2364 4,234.00 101,616.00
6728 ft gem Step: 3364 4,453.00 106,872.00
6728 ft gem Step: 4364 4,670.00 112,080.00
6728 ft gem Step: 5364 4,905.00 117,720.00
1297 ENGINEERING PROGRAMS ANALYST ft gem Step: 1040 4,132.00 99,168.00 040 1297 ft gem Step: 2040 4,340.00 104,160.00
1297 ft gem Step: 3040 4,557.00 109,368.00
1297 ft gem Step: 4040 4,785.00 114,840.00
1297 ft gem Step: 5040 5,026.00 120,624.00
1286 ENGINEERING PROJECTS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1344 4,965.00 119,160.00 344 1286 ft mea Step: 2344 5,211.00 125,064.00
1286 ft mea Step: 3344 5,473.00 131,352.00
1286 ft mea Step: 4344 5,744.00 137,856.00
1286 ft mea Step: 5344 6,032.00 144,768.00
4103 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1090 3,242.00 77,808.00 090 4103 ft gem Step: 2090 3,402.00 81,648.00
4103 ft gem Step: 3090 3,573.00 85,752.00
4103 ft gem Step: 4090 3,751.00 90,024.00
4103 ft gem Step: 5090 3,941.00 94,584.00
1276 ENVIRONMENTAL REG ANALYST ft gem Step: 1329 4,132.00 99,168.00 329 1276 ft gem Step: 2329 4,340.00 104,160.00
1276 ft gem Step: 3329 4,557.00 109,368.00
1276 ft gem Step: 4329 4,785.00 114,840.00
1276 ft gem Step: 5329 5,026.00 120,624.00
4108 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS MGR. ft mea Step: 1334 4,841.00 116,184.00 334 4108 ft mea Step: 2334 5,086.00 122,064.00
4108 ft mea Step: 3334 5,333.00 127,992.00
4108 ft mea Step: 4334 5,605.00 134,520.00
4108 ft mea Step: 5334 5,887.00 141,288.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 9 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 54, Packet Page 323 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6517 EVENT & SALES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1086 2,555.00 61,320.00 086 6517 ft gem Step: 2086 2,682.00 64,368.00
6517 ft gem Step: 3086 2,816.00 67,584.00
6517 ft gem Step: 4086 2,958.00 70,992.00
6517 ft gem Step: 5086 3,108.00 74,592.00
6507 EVENT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1140 3,482.00 83,568.00 140 6507 pt gem Step: 2140 3,656.00 87,744.00
6507 pt gem Step: 3140 3,840.00 92,160.00
6507 pt gem Step: 4140 4,031.00 96,744.00
6507 pt gem Step: 5140 4,233.00 101,592.00
6513 EVENT SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1144 3,835.00 92,040.00 144 6513 pt gem Step: 2144 4,027.00 96,648.00
6513 pt gem Step: 3144 4,228.00 101,472.00
6513 pt gem Step: 4144 4,438.00 106,512.00
6513 pt gem Step: 5144 4,660.00 111,840.00
3318 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1288 2,889.00 69,336.00 288 3318 ft gem Step: 2288 3,035.00 72,840.00
3318 ft gem Step: 3288 3,188.00 76,512.00
3318 ft gem Step: 4288 3,347.00 80,328.00
3318 ft gem Step: 5288 3,516.00 84,384.00
3324 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1289 3,238.00 77,712.00 289 3324 ft gem Step: 2289 3,398.00 81,552.00
3324 ft gem Step: 3289 3,570.00 85,680.00
3324 ft gem Step: 4289 3,748.00 89,952.00
3324 ft gem Step: 5289 3,937.00 94,488.00
5209 FACILITIES MAINT. COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1305 4,157.00 99,768.00 305 5209 ft gem Step: 2305 4,365.00 104,760.00
5209 ft gem Step: 3305 4,583.00 109,992.00
5209 ft gem Step: 4305 4,814.00 115,536.00
5209 ft gem Step: 5305 5,057.00 121,368.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 10 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 55, Packet Page 324 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6504 FACILITY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1138 2,637.00 63,288.00 138 6504 pt gem Step: 2138 2,770.00 66,480.00
6504 pt gem Step: 3138 2,910.00 69,840.00
6504 pt gem Step: 4138 3,056.00 73,344.00
6504 pt gem Step: 5138 3,207.00 76,968.00
5205 FACILITY COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1111 3,482.00 83,568.00 111 5205 pt gem Step: 2111 3,656.00 87,744.00
5205 pt gem Step: 3111 3,840.00 92,160.00
5205 pt gem Step: 4111 4,031.00 96,744.00
5205 pt gem Step: 5111 4,233.00 101,592.00
3109 FIELD ASSISTANT pt gem Step: 1172 2,555.00 61,320.00 172 3109 pt gem Step: 2172 2,682.00 64,368.00
3109 pt gem Step: 3172 2,816.00 67,584.00
3109 pt gem Step: 4172 2,958.00 70,992.00
3109 pt gem Step: 5172 3,108.00 74,592.00
1252 FINANCE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1294 4,088.00 98,112.00 294 1252 ft mea Step: 2294 4,295.00 103,080.00
1252 ft mea Step: 3294 4,507.00 108,168.00
1252 ft mea Step: 4294 4,734.00 113,616.00
1252 ft mea Step: 5294 4,971.00 119,304.00
1106 FINANCE DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5004 9,737.00 233,688.00 004 1277 FINANCE MANAGER ft mea Step: 1051 5,829.00 139,896.00 051 1277 ft mea Step: 2051 6,121.00 146,904.00
1277 ft mea Step: 3051 6,428.00 154,272.00
1277 ft mea Step: 4051 6,751.00 162,024.00
1277 ft mea Step: 5051 7,080.00 169,920.00
2201 FIRE CAPTAIN ft mffa Step: 1059 5,281.00 126,744.00 059 2201 ft mffa Step: 2059 5,544.00 133,056.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 3059 5,821.00 139,704.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 4059 6,109.00 146,616.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 5059 6,415.00 153,960.00
1107 FIRE CHIEF ft exec Step: 5005 10,962.00 263,088.00 005 General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 11 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 56, Packet Page 325 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2203 FIRE ENGINEER ft mffa Step: 1060 4,560.00 109,440.00 060 2203 ft mffa Step: 2060 4,787.00 114,888.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 3060 5,028.00 120,672.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 4060 5,281.00 126,744.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 5060 5,544.00 133,056.00
2207 FIRE INSPECTOR I ft gem Step: 1178 3,359.00 80,616.00 178 2207 ft gem Step: 2178 3,529.00 84,696.00
2207 ft gem Step: 3178 3,705.00 88,920.00
2207 ft gem Step: 4178 3,890.00 93,360.00
2207 ft gem Step: 5178 4,084.00 98,016.00
2208 FIRE INSPECTOR II ft gem Step: 1182 3,696.00 88,704.00 182 2208 ft gem Step: 2182 3,881.00 93,144.00
2208 ft gem Step: 3182 4,075.00 97,800.00
2208 ft gem Step: 4182 4,279.00 102,696.00
2208 ft gem Step: 5182 4,492.00 107,808.00
4309 FIRE PREV PLANS EXAM/INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1369 4,236.00 101,664.00 369 4309 ft gem Step: 2369 4,448.00 106,752.00
4309 ft gem Step: 3369 4,670.00 112,080.00
4309 ft gem Step: 4369 4,904.00 117,696.00
4309 ft gem Step: 5369 5,146.00 123,504.00
3329 FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1324 3,088.00 74,112.00 324 3329 ft gem Step: 2324 3,242.00 77,808.00
3329 ft gem Step: 3324 3,402.00 81,648.00
3329 ft gem Step: 4324 3,573.00 85,752.00
3329 ft gem Step: 5324 3,751.00 90,024.00
2206 FIREFIGHTER ft mffa Step: 1062 4,135.00 99,240.00 062 2206 ft mffa Step: 2062 4,342.00 104,208.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 3062 4,560.00 109,440.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 4062 4,787.00 114,888.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 5062 5,028.00 120,672.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 12 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 57, Packet Page 326 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5212 FITNESS SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1375 4,074.00 97,776.00 375 5212 pt gem Step: 2375 4,274.00 102,576.00
5212 pt gem Step: 3375 4,488.00 107,712.00
5212 pt gem Step: 4375 4,711.00 113,064.00
5212 pt gem Step: 5375 4,946.00 118,704.00
6307 FLEET MANAGER rpt mea Step: 1360 4,643.00 111,432.00 360 6307 rpt mea Step: 2360 4,875.00 117,000.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 3360 5,118.00 122,832.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 4360 5,377.00 129,048.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 5360 5,646.00 135,504.00
6810 FUND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1356 3,535.00 84,840.00 356 6810 pt gem Step: 2356 3,712.00 89,088.00
6810 pt gem Step: 3356 3,896.00 93,504.00
6810 pt gem Step: 4356 4,089.00 98,136.00
6810 pt gem Step: 5356 4,295.00 103,080.00
1285 GEN SERV FIELD OPERATION MGR ft mea Step: 1339 5,512.00 132,288.00 339 1285 ft mea Step: 2339 5,788.00 138,912.00
1285 ft mea Step: 3339 6,077.00 145,848.00
1285 ft mea Step: 4339 6,380.00 153,120.00
1285 ft mea Step: 5339 6,700.00 160,800.00
1272 GENERAL SRVC SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1313 6,220.00 149,280.00 313 1272 ft mea Step: 2313 6,526.00 156,624.00
1272 ft mea Step: 3313 6,858.00 164,592.00
1272 ft mea Step: 4313 7,199.00 172,776.00
1272 ft mea Step: 5313 7,559.00 181,416.00
3602 GEO INFO SYS (GIS) COORDINATOR ft mea Step: 1248 4,479.00 107,496.00 248 3602 ft mea Step: 2248 4,703.00 112,872.00
3602 ft mea Step: 3248 4,939.00 118,536.00
3602 ft mea Step: 4248 5,184.00 124,416.00
3602 ft mea Step: 5248 5,444.00 130,656.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 13 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 58, Packet Page 327 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6720 GREENBELT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1115 3,022.00 72,528.00 115 6720 pt gem Step: 2115 3,173.00 76,152.00
6720 pt gem Step: 3115 3,329.00 79,896.00
6720 pt gem Step: 4115 3,504.00 84,096.00
6720 pt gem Step: 5115 3,676.00 88,224.00
5307 GUEST SERVICE SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1372 2,369.00 56,856.00 372 5307 pt gem Step: 2372 2,490.00 59,760.00
5307 pt gem Step: 3372 2,615.00 62,760.00
5307 pt gem Step: 4372 2,746.00 65,904.00
5307 pt gem Step: 5372 2,881.00 69,144.00
6111 HARBOR COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1359 3,482.00 83,568.00 359 6111 ft gem Step: 2359 3,656.00 87,744.00
6111 ft gem Step: 3359 3,840.00 92,160.00
6111 ft gem Step: 4359 4,031.00 96,744.00
6111 ft gem Step: 5359 4,233.00 101,592.00
6110 HARBOR MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1269 3,030.00 72,720.00 269 6110 ft gem Step: 2269 3,180.00 76,320.00
6110 ft gem Step: 3269 3,344.00 80,256.00
6110 ft gem Step: 4269 3,504.00 84,096.00
6110 ft gem Step: 5269 3,680.00 88,320.00
6102 HARBOR MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1186 3,260.00 78,240.00 186 6102 ft gem Step: 2186 3,422.00 82,128.00
6102 ft gem Step: 3186 3,598.00 86,352.00
6102 ft gem Step: 4186 3,774.00 90,576.00
6102 ft gem Step: 5186 3,965.00 95,160.00
6105 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER pt gem Step: 1120 2,732.00 65,568.00 120 6105 pt gem Step: 2120 2,869.00 68,856.00
6105 pt gem Step: 3120 3,016.00 72,384.00
6105 pt gem Step: 4120 3,165.00 75,960.00
6105 pt gem Step: 5120 3,325.00 79,800.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 14 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 59, Packet Page 328 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1210 HARBORMASTER ft mea Step: 1020 5,829.00 139,896.00 020 1210 ft mea Step: 2020 6,121.00 146,904.00
1210 ft mea Step: 3020 6,428.00 154,272.00
1210 ft mea Step: 4020 6,751.00 162,024.00
1210 ft mea Step: 5020 7,080.00 169,920.00
4208 HCD COORDINATOR-PROJ &PROGRAMS ft gem Step: 1230 3,676.00 88,224.00 230 4208 ft gem Step: 2230 3,858.00 92,592.00
4208 ft gem Step: 3230 4,052.00 97,248.00
4208 ft gem Step: 4230 4,255.00 102,120.00
4208 ft gem Step: 5230 4,468.00 107,232.00
6512 HISTORIC FAC. SR. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1203 3,414.00 81,936.00 203 6512 ft gem Step: 2203 3,588.00 86,112.00
6512 ft gem Step: 3203 3,769.00 90,456.00
6512 ft gem Step: 4203 3,959.00 95,016.00
6512 ft gem Step: 5203 4,155.00 99,720.00
2106 HOMELESS NAVIGATOR ft gem Step: 1198 3,569.00 85,656.00 198 2106 ft gem Step: 2198 3,748.00 89,952.00
2106 ft gem Step: 3198 3,935.00 94,440.00
2106 ft gem Step: 4198 4,132.00 99,168.00
2106 ft gem Step: 5198 4,338.00 104,112.00
1289 HOUSING MANAGER ft mea Step: 1368 5,036.00 120,864.00 368 1289 ft mea Step: 2368 5,288.00 126,912.00
1289 ft mea Step: 3368 5,552.00 133,248.00
1289 ft mea Step: 4368 5,833.00 139,992.00
1289 ft mea Step: 5368 6,126.00 147,024.00
1250 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST ft mea Step: 1267 4,088.00 98,112.00 267 1250 ft mea Step: 2267 4,295.00 103,080.00
1250 ft mea Step: 3267 4,508.00 108,192.00
1250 ft mea Step: 4267 4,734.00 113,616.00
1250 ft mea Step: 5267 4,971.00 119,304.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 15 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 60, Packet Page 329 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3331 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1335 2,624.00 62,976.00 335 3331 ft gem Step: 2335 2,755.00 66,120.00
3331 ft gem Step: 3335 2,893.00 69,432.00
3331 ft gem Step: 4335 3,038.00 72,912.00
3331 ft gem Step: 5335 3,192.00 76,608.00
3332 HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1361 3,482.00 83,568.00 361 3332 ft gem Step: 2361 3,656.00 87,744.00
3332 ft gem Step: 3361 3,840.00 92,160.00
3332 ft gem Step: 4361 4,031.00 96,744.00
3332 ft gem Step: 5361 4,233.00 101,592.00
1112 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5277 9,605.00 230,520.00 277 3322 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1280 3,139.00 75,336.00 280 3322 ft gem Step: 2280 3,294.00 79,056.00
3322 ft gem Step: 3280 3,456.00 82,944.00
3322 ft gem Step: 4280 3,631.00 87,144.00
3322 ft gem Step: 5280 3,813.00 91,512.00
4307 HVAC SENIOR TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1306 3,521.00 84,504.00 306 4307 ft gem Step: 2306 3,699.00 88,776.00
4307 ft gem Step: 3306 3,881.00 93,144.00
4307 ft gem Step: 4306 4,078.00 97,872.00
4307 ft gem Step: 5306 4,281.00 102,744.00
3107 INFORMATION TECH SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1378 3,484.00 83,616.00 378 3107 ft gem Step: 2378 3,658.00 87,792.00
3107 ft gem Step: 3378 3,844.00 92,256.00
3107 ft gem Step: 4378 4,034.00 96,816.00
3107 ft gem Step: 5378 4,236.00 101,664.00
4301 INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1100 4,035.00 96,840.00 100 4301 ft gem Step: 2100 4,234.00 101,616.00
4301 ft gem Step: 3100 4,453.00 106,872.00
4301 ft gem Step: 4100 4,670.00 112,080.00
4301 ft gem Step: 5100 4,905.00 117,720.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 16 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 61, Packet Page 330 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3610 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER I ft gem Step: 1069 3,973.00 95,352.00 069 3610 ft gem Step: 2069 4,173.00 100,152.00
3610 ft gem Step: 3069 4,382.00 105,168.00
3610 ft gem Step: 4069 4,601.00 110,424.00
3610 ft gem Step: 5069 4,833.00 115,992.00
1236 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER II ft gem Step: 1038 4,774.00 114,576.00 038 1236 ft gem Step: 2038 5,011.00 120,264.00
1236 ft gem Step: 3038 5,262.00 126,288.00
1236 ft gem Step: 4038 5,523.00 132,552.00
1236 ft gem Step: 5038 5,800.00 139,200.00
3611 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER III ft gem Step: 1080 5,164.00 123,936.00 080 3611 ft gem Step: 2080 5,422.00 130,128.00
3611 ft gem Step: 3080 5,692.00 136,608.00
3611 ft gem Step: 4080 5,977.00 143,448.00
3611 ft gem Step: 5080 6,272.00 150,528.00
3604 IT NETWORK ENGINEER I ft mea Step: 1380 5,165.00 123,960.00 380 3604 ft mea Step: 2380 5,422.00 130,128.00
3604 ft mea Step: 3380 5,688.00 136,512.00
3604 ft mea Step: 4380 5,977.00 143,448.00
3604 ft mea Step: 5380 6,269.00 150,456.00
6508 LAUNDRY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1250 1,363.00 32,712.00 250 6508 pt gem Step: 2250 1,434.00 34,416.00
6508 pt gem Step: 3250 1,502.00 36,048.00
6508 pt gem Step: 4250 1,580.00 37,920.00
6508 pt gem Step: 5250 1,655.00 39,720.00
6518 LEAD CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1142 2,539.00 60,936.00 142 6518 pt gem Step: 2142 2,667.00 64,008.00
6518 pt gem Step: 3142 2,801.00 67,224.00
6518 pt gem Step: 4142 2,941.00 70,584.00
6518 pt gem Step: 5142 3,087.00 74,088.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 17 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 62, Packet Page 331 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6304 LEAD MECHANIC rpt gem Step: 1254 3,401.00 81,624.00 254 6304 rpt gem Step: 2254 3,577.00 85,848.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 3254 3,751.00 90,024.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 4254 3,941.00 94,584.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 5254 4,134.00 99,216.00
3316 LEGAL SECRETARY pt gem Step: 1078 2,889.00 69,336.00 078 3316 pt gem Step: 2078 3,035.00 72,840.00
3316 pt gem Step: 3078 3,188.00 76,512.00
3316 pt gem Step: 4078 3,347.00 80,328.00
3316 pt gem Step: 5078 3,516.00 84,384.00
5101 LIBRARIAN pt gem Step: 1104 3,332.00 79,968.00 104 5101 pt gem Step: 2104 3,495.00 83,880.00
5101 pt gem Step: 3104 3,673.00 88,152.00
5101 pt gem Step: 4104 3,854.00 92,496.00
5101 pt gem Step: 5104 4,047.00 97,128.00
3101 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I pt gem Step: 1063 2,436.00 58,464.00 063 3101 pt gem Step: 2063 2,556.00 61,344.00
3101 pt gem Step: 3063 2,683.00 64,392.00
3101 pt gem Step: 4063 2,818.00 67,632.00
3101 pt gem Step: 5063 2,959.00 71,016.00
3102 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1064 2,555.00 61,320.00 064 3102 ft gem Step: 2064 2,682.00 64,368.00
3102 ft gem Step: 3064 2,816.00 67,584.00
3102 ft gem Step: 4064 2,958.00 70,992.00
3102 ft gem Step: 5064 3,108.00 74,592.00
1105 LIBRARY DIRECTOR pt exec Step: 5003 9,199.00 220,776.00 003 1255 LIBRARY MANAGER pt mea Step: 1028 4,929.00 118,296.00 028 1255 pt mea Step: 2028 5,174.00 124,176.00
1255 pt mea Step: 3028 5,430.00 130,320.00
1255 pt mea Step: 4028 5,705.00 136,920.00
1255 pt mea Step: 5028 5,986.00 143,664.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 18 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 63, Packet Page 332 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6718 MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1299 2,539.00 60,936.00 299 6718 pt gem Step: 2299 2,667.00 64,008.00
6718 pt gem Step: 3299 2,801.00 67,224.00
6718 pt gem Step: 4299 2,936.00 70,464.00
6718 pt gem Step: 5299 3,086.00 74,064.00
6109 MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1216 3,047.00 73,128.00 216 6109 ft gem Step: 2216 3,200.00 76,800.00
6109 ft gem Step: 3216 3,357.00 80,568.00
6109 ft gem Step: 4216 3,527.00 84,648.00
6109 ft gem Step: 5216 3,705.00 88,920.00
1249 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I ft mea Step: 1187 4,088.00 98,112.00 187 1249 ft mea Step: 2187 4,295.00 103,080.00
1249 ft mea Step: 3187 4,508.00 108,192.00
1249 ft mea Step: 4187 4,734.00 113,616.00
1249 ft mea Step: 5187 4,971.00 119,304.00
1301 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II ft mea Step: 1047 4,962.00 119,088.00 047 1301 ft mea Step: 2047 5,210.00 125,040.00
1301 ft mea Step: 3047 5,470.00 131,280.00
1301 ft mea Step: 4047 5,744.00 137,856.00
1301 ft mea Step: 5047 6,032.00 144,768.00
3328 MARINA HARBOR ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1298 3,238.00 77,712.00 298 3328 ft gem Step: 2298 3,398.00 81,552.00
3328 ft gem Step: 3298 3,570.00 85,680.00
3328 ft gem Step: 4298 3,748.00 89,952.00
3328 ft gem Step: 5298 3,937.00 94,488.00
8101 MAYOR ft counc Step: 1300 708.75 17,010.00 300
6813 MEDIA SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1094 2,555.00 61,320.00 094 6813 pt gem Step: 2094 2,682.00 64,368.00
6813 pt gem Step: 3094 2,816.00 67,584.00
6813 pt gem Step: 4094 2,958.00 70,992.00
6813 pt gem Step: 5094 3,108.00 74,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 19 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 64, Packet Page 333 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5306 MEDICAL RECORDS ASSISTANT pt gem Step: 1711 2,555.00 61,320.00 711 5306 pt gem Step: 2711 2,682.00 64,368.00
5306 pt gem Step: 3711 2,816.00 67,584.00
5306 pt gem Step: 4711 2,958.00 70,992.00
5306 pt gem Step: 5711 3,108.00 74,592.00
1282 MUSEUM CULTURAL ARTS /ARCH MGR pt mea Step: 1336 4,088.00 98,112.00 336 1282 pt mea Step: 2336 4,295.00 103,080.00
1282 pt mea Step: 3336 4,508.00 108,192.00
1282 pt mea Step: 4336 4,734.00 113,616.00
1282 pt mea Step: 5336 4,971.00 119,304.00
1284 NETWORK ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1338 4,965.00 119,160.00 338 1284 ft mea Step: 2338 5,211.00 125,064.00
1284 ft mea Step: 3338 5,473.00 131,352.00
1284 ft mea Step: 4338 5,744.00 137,856.00
1284 ft mea Step: 5338 6,032.00 144,768.00
6515 OPERATIONS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1322 3,482.00 83,568.00 322 6515 pt gem Step: 2322 3,656.00 87,744.00
6515 pt gem Step: 3322 3,840.00 92,160.00
6515 pt gem Step: 4322 4,031.00 96,744.00
6515 pt gem Step: 5322 4,233.00 101,592.00
6506 OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1139 3,835.00 92,040.00 139 6506 pt gem Step: 2139 4,027.00 96,648.00
6506 pt gem Step: 3139 4,228.00 101,472.00
6506 pt gem Step: 4139 4,438.00 106,512.00
6506 pt gem Step: 5139 4,660.00 111,840.00
6703 PARK ATTENDANT ft gem Step: 1158 2,755.00 66,120.00 158 6703 ft gem Step: 2158 2,895.00 69,480.00
6703 ft gem Step: 3158 3,039.00 72,936.00
6703 ft gem Step: 4158 3,190.00 76,560.00
6703 ft gem Step: 5158 3,353.00 80,472.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 20 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 65, Packet Page 334 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6704 PARK MAINTENANCE CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1194 2,824.00 67,776.00 194 6704 ft gem Step: 2194 2,966.00 71,184.00
6704 ft gem Step: 3194 3,113.00 74,712.00
6704 ft gem Step: 4194 3,268.00 78,432.00
6704 ft gem Step: 5194 3,429.00 82,296.00
6705 PARK MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1160 3,112.00 74,688.00 160 6705 ft gem Step: 2160 3,267.00 78,408.00
6705 ft gem Step: 3160 3,426.00 82,224.00
6705 ft gem Step: 4160 3,596.00 86,304.00
6705 ft gem Step: 5160 3,780.00 90,720.00
6701 PARK MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1156 3,598.00 86,352.00 156 6701 ft gem Step: 2156 3,780.00 90,720.00
6701 ft gem Step: 3156 3,971.00 95,304.00
6701 ft gem Step: 4156 4,167.00 100,008.00
6701 ft gem Step: 5156 4,374.00 104,976.00
6706 PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1161 2,323.00 55,752.00 161 6706 ft gem Step: 2161 2,440.00 58,560.00
6706 ft gem Step: 3161 2,562.00 61,488.00
6706 ft gem Step: 4161 2,691.00 64,584.00
6706 ft gem Step: 5161 2,824.00 67,776.00
6706 ft gem Step: 6161 2,965.00 71,160.00
6706 ft gem Step: 7161 3,113.00 74,712.00
1283 PARK OPERATIONS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1337 4,643.00 111,432.00 337 1283 ft mea Step: 2337 4,875.00 117,000.00
1283 ft mea Step: 3337 5,118.00 122,832.00
1283 ft mea Step: 4337 5,377.00 129,048.00
1283 ft mea Step: 5337 5,646.00 135,504.00
6606 PARKING CONTROLS TECHNICIAN pt gem Step: 1274 3,179.00 76,296.00 274 6606 pt gem Step: 2274 3,336.00 80,064.00
6606 pt gem Step: 3274 3,503.00 84,072.00
6606 pt gem Step: 4274 3,682.00 88,368.00
6606 pt gem Step: 5274 3,863.00 92,712.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 21 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 66, Packet Page 335 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6601 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ft gem Step: 1145 2,732.00 65,568.00 145 6601 ft gem Step: 2145 2,871.00 68,904.00
6601 ft gem Step: 3145 3,015.00 72,360.00
6601 ft gem Step: 4145 3,164.00 75,936.00
6601 ft gem Step: 5145 3,325.00 79,800.00
6605 PARKING ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1149 3,833.00 91,992.00 149 6605 ft gem Step: 2149 4,027.00 96,648.00
6605 ft gem Step: 3149 4,228.00 101,472.00
6605 ft gem Step: 4149 4,438.00 106,512.00
6605 ft gem Step: 5149 4,660.00 111,840.00
6615 PARKING MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER pt gem Step: 1159 3,260.00 78,240.00 159 6615 pt gem Step: 2159 3,422.00 82,128.00
6615 pt gem Step: 3159 3,598.00 86,352.00
6615 pt gem Step: 4159 3,774.00 90,576.00
6615 pt gem Step: 5159 3,965.00 95,160.00
6604 PARKING MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1148 3,856.00 92,544.00 148 6604 pt gem Step: 2148 4,051.00 97,224.00
6604 pt gem Step: 3148 4,254.00 102,096.00
6604 pt gem Step: 4148 4,465.00 107,160.00
6604 pt gem Step: 5148 4,688.00 112,512.00
6608 PARKING MAINTENANCE WORKER pt gem Step: 1151 2,318.00 55,632.00 151 6608 pt gem Step: 2151 2,434.00 58,416.00
6608 pt gem Step: 3151 2,555.00 61,320.00
6608 pt gem Step: 4151 2,683.00 64,392.00
6608 pt gem Step: 5151 2,817.00 67,608.00
6608 pt gem Step: 6151 2,957.00 70,968.00
6608 pt gem Step: 7151 3,105.00 74,520.00
6616 PARKING SERVICES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1116 4,160.00 99,840.00 116 6616 ft gem Step: 2116 4,365.00 104,760.00
6616 ft gem Step: 3116 4,583.00 109,992.00
6616 ft gem Step: 4116 4,814.00 115,536.00
6616 ft gem Step: 5116 5,057.00 121,368.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 22 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 67, Packet Page 336 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6617 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV ft gem Step: 1117 2,555.00 61,320.00 117 6617 ft gem Step: 2117 2,683.00 64,392.00
6617 ft gem Step: 3117 2,817.00 67,608.00
6617 ft gem Step: 4117 2,957.00 70,968.00
6617 ft gem Step: 5117 3,105.00 74,520.00
6618 PARKING SERVICES SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1118 3,157.00 75,768.00 118 6618 ft gem Step: 2118 3,313.00 79,512.00
6618 ft gem Step: 3118 3,477.00 83,448.00
6618 ft gem Step: 4118 3,653.00 87,672.00
6618 ft gem Step: 5118 3,836.00 92,064.00
1212 PARKING SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1022 5,829.00 139,896.00 022 1212 ft mea Step: 2022 6,121.00 146,904.00
1212 ft mea Step: 3022 6,428.00 154,272.00
1212 ft mea Step: 4022 6,751.00 162,024.00
1212 ft mea Step: 5022 7,080.00 169,920.00
1292 PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5014 9,447.00 226,728.00 014 6711 PARKS CRAFTS LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1264 3,086.00 74,064.00 264 6711 ft gem Step: 2264 3,240.00 77,760.00
6711 ft gem Step: 3264 3,398.00 81,552.00
6711 ft gem Step: 4264 3,567.00 85,608.00
6711 ft gem Step: 5264 3,749.00 89,976.00
6305 PARTS CLERK ft gem Step: 1253 2,555.00 61,320.00 253 6305 ft gem Step: 2253 2,683.00 64,392.00
6305 ft gem Step: 3253 2,817.00 67,608.00
6305 ft gem Step: 4253 2,957.00 70,968.00
6305 ft gem Step: 5253 3,105.00 74,520.00
1215 PLANNING MANAGER ft mea Step: 1025 6,650.00 159,600.00 025 1215 ft mea Step: 2025 6,982.00 167,568.00
1215 ft mea Step: 3025 7,332.00 175,968.00
1215 ft mea Step: 4025 7,699.00 184,776.00
1215 ft mea Step: 5025 8,084.00 194,016.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 23 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 68, Packet Page 337 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4305 PLANS EXAMINER ft gem Step: 1258 4,236.00 101,664.00 258 4305 ft gem Step: 2258 4,448.00 106,752.00
4305 ft gem Step: 3258 4,670.00 112,080.00
4305 ft gem Step: 4258 4,904.00 117,696.00
4305 ft gem Step: 5258 5,146.00 123,504.00
1111 POLICE CHIEF ft exec Step: 5007 11,835.00 284,040.00 007 1214 POLICE LIEUTENANT ft plma Step: 1024 7,407.00 177,768.00 024 1214 ft plma Step: 2024 7,778.00 186,672.00
1214 ft plma Step: 3024 8,171.00 196,104.00
1214 ft plma Step: 4024 8,579.00 205,896.00
1214 ft plma Step: 5024 9,006.00 216,144.00
2103 POLICE OFFICER ft mpa Step: 1057 4,729.00 113,496.00 057 2103 ft mpa Step: 2057 4,966.00 119,184.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 3057 5,218.00 125,232.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 4057 5,473.00 131,352.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 5057 5,743.00 137,832.00
3201 POLICE RECORDS/DETENTION SUP. ft gem Step: 1191 4,321.00 103,704.00 191 3201 ft gem Step: 2191 4,538.00 108,912.00
3201 ft gem Step: 3191 4,765.00 114,360.00
3201 ft gem Step: 4191 5,003.00 120,072.00
3201 ft gem Step: 5191 5,255.00 126,120.00
2105 POLICE SERGEANT ft mpa Step: 1058 5,773.00 138,552.00 058 2105 ft mpa Step: 2058 6,058.00 145,392.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 3058 6,363.00 152,712.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 4058 6,680.00 160,320.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 5058 7,020.00 168,480.00
3209 POLICE SERVICES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1346 2,624.00 62,976.00 346 3209 ft gem Step: 2346 2,755.00 66,120.00
3209 ft gem Step: 3346 2,893.00 69,432.00
3209 ft gem Step: 4346 3,038.00 72,912.00
3209 ft gem Step: 5346 3,192.00 76,608.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 24 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 69, Packet Page 338 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3205 POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1068 3,229.00 77,496.00 068 3205 ft gem Step: 2068 3,389.00 81,336.00
3205 ft gem Step: 3068 3,558.00 85,392.00
3205 ft gem Step: 4068 3,737.00 89,688.00
3205 ft gem Step: 5068 3,923.00 94,152.00
1267 PRINCIPAL PLANNER ft mea Step: 1307 5,398.00 129,552.00 307 1267 ft mea Step: 2307 5,670.00 136,080.00
1267 ft mea Step: 3307 5,950.00 142,800.00
1267 ft mea Step: 4307 6,249.00 149,976.00
1267 ft mea Step: 5307 6,561.00 157,464.00
1259 PROPERTY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1030 5,291.00 126,984.00 030 1259 ft mea Step: 2030 5,620.00 134,880.00
1259 ft mea Step: 3030 5,952.00 142,848.00
1259 ft mea Step: 4030 6,281.00 150,744.00
1259 ft mea Step: 5030 6,612.00 158,688.00
3306 PROPERTY TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1219 3,086.00 74,064.00 219 3306 ft gem Step: 2219 3,241.00 77,784.00
3306 ft gem Step: 3219 3,403.00 81,672.00
3306 ft gem Step: 4219 3,572.00 85,728.00
3306 ft gem Step: 5219 3,751.00 90,024.00
1116 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 5009 10,326.00 247,824.00 009 4105 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1092 3,675.00 88,200.00 092 4105 ft gem Step: 2092 3,857.00 92,568.00
4105 ft gem Step: 3092 4,053.00 97,272.00
4105 ft gem Step: 4092 4,257.00 102,168.00
4105 ft gem Step: 5092 4,469.00 107,256.00
1275 PURCHASING ANALYST ft mea Step: 1327 4,089.00 98,136.00 327 1275 ft mea Step: 2327 4,294.00 103,056.00
1275 ft mea Step: 3327 4,509.00 108,216.00
1275 ft mea Step: 4327 4,734.00 113,616.00
1275 ft mea Step: 5327 4,971.00 119,304.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 25 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 70, Packet Page 339 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1234 PW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MGR ft mea Step: 1036 5,829.00 139,896.00 036 1234 ft mea Step: 2036 6,121.00 146,904.00
1234 ft mea Step: 3036 6,428.00 154,272.00
1234 ft mea Step: 4036 6,751.00 162,024.00
1234 ft mea Step: 5036 7,080.00 169,920.00
4102 QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1234 4,035.00 96,840.00 234 4102 ft gem Step: 2234 4,234.00 101,616.00
4102 ft gem Step: 3234 4,453.00 106,872.00
4102 ft gem Step: 4234 4,670.00 112,080.00
4102 ft gem Step: 5234 4,905.00 117,720.00
5208 RECREATION COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1292 3,482.00 83,568.00 292 5208 pt gem Step: 2292 3,656.00 87,744.00
5208 pt gem Step: 3292 3,840.00 92,160.00
5208 pt gem Step: 4292 4,031.00 96,744.00
5208 pt gem Step: 5292 4,233.00 101,592.00
1230 RECREATION MANAGER ft mea Step: 1291 5,829.00 139,896.00 291 1230 ft mea Step: 2291 6,121.00 146,904.00
1230 ft mea Step: 3291 6,428.00 154,272.00
1230 ft mea Step: 4291 6,751.00 162,024.00
1230 ft mea Step: 5291 7,080.00 169,920.00
9581 RECREATION SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1323 2,369.00 56,856.00 323 9581 pt gem Step: 2323 2,490.00 59,760.00
9581 pt gem Step: 3323 2,615.00 62,760.00
9581 pt gem Step: 4323 2,746.00 65,904.00
9581 pt gem Step: 5323 2,881.00 69,144.00
5201 RECREATION SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1259 4,074.00 97,776.00 259 5201 ft gem Step: 2259 4,274.00 102,576.00
5201 ft gem Step: 3259 4,488.00 107,712.00
5201 ft gem Step: 4259 4,711.00 113,064.00
5201 ft gem Step: 5259 4,946.00 118,704.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 26 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 71, Packet Page 340 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1256 RISK MANAGER ft mea Step: 1052 4,859.00 116,616.00 052 1256 ft mea Step: 2052 5,099.00 122,376.00
1256 ft mea Step: 3052 5,351.00 128,424.00
1256 ft mea Step: 4052 5,618.00 134,832.00
1256 ft mea Step: 5052 5,899.00 141,576.00
3333 RISK SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1371 3,139.00 75,336.00 371 3333 ft gem Step: 2371 3,294.00 79,056.00
3333 ft gem Step: 3371 3,456.00 82,944.00
3333 ft gem Step: 4371 3,631.00 87,144.00
3333 ft gem Step: 5371 3,813.00 91,512.00
6516 SALES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1081 3,482.00 83,568.00 081 6516 ft gem Step: 2081 3,656.00 87,744.00
6516 ft gem Step: 3081 3,840.00 92,160.00
6516 ft gem Step: 4081 4,031.00 96,744.00
6516 ft gem Step: 5081 4,233.00 101,592.00
1263 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT ft mea Step: 1262 4,673.00 112,152.00 262 1263 ft mea Step: 2262 4,904.00 117,696.00
1263 ft mea Step: 3262 5,146.00 123,504.00
1263 ft mea Step: 4262 5,404.00 129,696.00
1263 ft mea Step: 5262 5,674.00 136,176.00
1265 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1284 4,673.00 112,152.00 284 1265 ft mea Step: 2284 4,904.00 117,696.00
1265 ft mea Step: 3284 5,146.00 123,504.00
1265 ft mea Step: 4284 5,404.00 129,696.00
1265 ft mea Step: 5284 5,674.00 136,176.00
4201 SENIOR ASSOCIATE PLANNER ft gem Step: 1251 4,526.00 108,624.00 251 4201 ft gem Step: 2251 4,754.00 114,096.00
4201 ft gem Step: 3251 4,992.00 119,808.00
4201 ft gem Step: 4251 5,237.00 125,688.00
4201 ft gem Step: 5251 5,501.00 132,024.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 27 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 72, Packet Page 341 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 4302 SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1101 4,236.00 101,664.00 101 4302 ft gem Step: 2101 4,448.00 106,752.00
4302 ft gem Step: 3101 4,670.00 112,080.00
4302 ft gem Step: 4101 4,904.00 117,696.00
4302 ft gem Step: 5101 5,146.00 123,504.00
6511 SENIOR CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1205 3,414.00 81,936.00 205 6511 ft gem Step: 2205 3,588.00 86,112.00
6511 ft gem Step: 3205 3,769.00 90,456.00
6511 ft gem Step: 4205 3,959.00 95,016.00
6511 ft gem Step: 5205 4,155.00 99,720.00
6514 SENIOR CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1257 2,262.00 54,288.00 257 6514 pt gem Step: 2257 2,373.00 56,952.00
6514 pt gem Step: 3257 2,493.00 59,832.00
6514 pt gem Step: 4257 2,620.00 62,880.00
6514 pt gem Step: 5257 2,753.00 66,072.00
1246 SENIOR ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1256 5,926.00 142,224.00 256 1246 ft mea Step: 2256 6,239.00 149,736.00
1246 ft mea Step: 3256 6,568.00 157,632.00
1246 ft mea Step: 4256 6,913.00 165,912.00
1246 ft mea Step: 5256 7,636.00 183,264.00
6505 SENIOR FACILITY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1211 3,252.00 78,048.00 211 6505 pt gem Step: 2211 3,414.00 81,936.00
6505 pt gem Step: 3211 3,583.00 85,992.00
6505 pt gem Step: 4211 3,762.00 90,288.00
6505 pt gem Step: 5211 3,953.00 94,872.00
1296 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCS ANALYST ft mea Step: 1376 4,673.00 112,152.00 376 1296 ft mea Step: 2376 4,904.00 117,696.00
1296 ft mea Step: 3376 5,146.00 123,504.00
1296 ft mea Step: 4376 5,404.00 129,696.00
1296 ft mea Step: 5376 5,674.00 136,176.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 28 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 73, Packet Page 342 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3607 SENIOR INFORMATION TECH SPECIA ft gem Step: 1084 3,881.00 93,144.00 084 3607 ft gem Step: 2084 4,075.00 97,800.00
3607 ft gem Step: 3084 4,278.00 102,672.00
3607 ft gem Step: 4084 4,492.00 107,808.00
3607 ft gem Step: 5084 4,716.00 113,184.00
1279 SENIOR LOCKSMITH ft gem Step: 1331 3,414.00 81,936.00 331 1279 ft gem Step: 2331 3,588.00 86,112.00
1279 ft gem Step: 3331 3,769.00 90,456.00
1279 ft gem Step: 4331 3,959.00 95,016.00
1279 ft gem Step: 5331 4,155.00 99,720.00
6707 SENIOR PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1162 2,824.00 67,776.00 162 6707 ft gem Step: 2162 2,966.00 71,184.00
6707 ft gem Step: 3162 3,113.00 74,712.00
6707 ft gem Step: 4162 3,268.00 78,432.00
6707 ft gem Step: 5162 3,429.00 82,296.00
6613 SENIOR PARKING CONTROLS TECH. pt gem Step: 1275 3,482.00 83,568.00 275 6613 pt gem Step: 2275 3,656.00 87,744.00
6613 pt gem Step: 3275 3,841.00 92,184.00
6613 pt gem Step: 4275 4,032.00 96,768.00
6613 pt gem Step: 5275 4,233.00 101,592.00
6611 SENIOR PARKING ENFOR. OFFICER ft gem Step: 1154 3,130.00 75,120.00 154 6611 ft gem Step: 2154 3,287.00 78,888.00
6611 ft gem Step: 3154 3,450.00 82,800.00
6611 ft gem Step: 4154 3,624.00 86,976.00
6611 ft gem Step: 5154 3,805.00 91,320.00
6803 SENIOR PARTS CLERK ft gem Step: 1347 3,030.00 72,720.00 347 6803 ft gem Step: 2347 3,180.00 76,320.00
6803 ft gem Step: 3347 3,344.00 80,256.00
6803 ft gem Step: 4347 3,504.00 84,096.00
6803 ft gem Step: 5347 3,680.00 88,320.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 29 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 74, Packet Page 343 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3207 SENIOR POLICE SERVICES TECH. ft gem Step: 1070 3,389.00 81,336.00 070 3207 ft gem Step: 2070 3,558.00 85,392.00
3207 ft gem Step: 3070 3,737.00 89,688.00
3207 ft gem Step: 4070 3,923.00 94,152.00
3207 ft gem Step: 5070 4,121.00 98,904.00
1219 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1029 5,512.00 132,288.00 029 1219 ft mea Step: 2029 5,788.00 138,912.00
1219 ft mea Step: 3029 6,077.00 145,848.00
1219 ft mea Step: 4029 6,380.00 153,120.00
1219 ft mea Step: 5029 6,700.00 160,800.00
4104 SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1093 4,035.00 96,840.00 093 4104 ft gem Step: 2093 4,234.00 101,616.00
4104 ft gem Step: 3093 4,453.00 106,872.00
4104 ft gem Step: 4093 4,670.00 112,080.00
4104 ft gem Step: 5093 4,905.00 117,720.00
6206 SENIOR STREET MAINT. WORKER ft gem Step: 1126 2,843.00 68,232.00 126 6206 ft gem Step: 2126 2,986.00 71,664.00
6206 ft gem Step: 3126 3,136.00 75,264.00
6206 ft gem Step: 4126 3,292.00 79,008.00
6206 ft gem Step: 5126 3,454.00 82,896.00
6212 SIGN CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1183 3,030.00 72,720.00 183 6212 ft gem Step: 2183 3,180.00 76,320.00
6212 ft gem Step: 3183 3,344.00 80,256.00
6212 ft gem Step: 4183 3,504.00 84,096.00
6212 ft gem Step: 5183 3,680.00 88,320.00
6811 SPECIAL EVENT COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1106 3,482.00 83,568.00 106 6811 ft gem Step: 2106 3,656.00 87,744.00
6811 ft gem Step: 3106 3,840.00 92,160.00
6811 ft gem Step: 4106 4,031.00 96,744.00
6811 ft gem Step: 5106 4,233.00 101,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 30 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 75, Packet Page 344 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5102 SPECIAL SERVICES COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1199 3,677.00 88,248.00 199 5102 pt gem Step: 2199 3,858.00 92,592.00
5102 pt gem Step: 3199 4,053.00 97,272.00
5102 pt gem Step: 4199 4,255.00 102,120.00
5102 pt gem Step: 5199 4,469.00 107,256.00
1258 SPORTS CENTER MANAGER pt mea Step: 1217 5,829.00 139,896.00 217 1258 pt mea Step: 2217 6,119.00 146,856.00
1258 pt mea Step: 3217 6,427.00 154,248.00
1258 pt mea Step: 4217 6,747.00 161,928.00
1258 pt mea Step: 5217 7,080.00 169,920.00
5204 SPORTS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1110 3,482.00 83,568.00 110 5204 pt gem Step: 2110 3,656.00 87,744.00
5204 pt gem Step: 3110 3,840.00 92,160.00
5204 pt gem Step: 4110 4,031.00 96,744.00
5204 pt gem Step: 5110 4,233.00 101,592.00
6204 STREET & UTILITIES SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1252 3,767.00 90,408.00 252 6204 ft gem Step: 2252 3,953.00 94,872.00
6204 ft gem Step: 3252 4,153.00 99,672.00
6204 ft gem Step: 4252 4,362.00 104,688.00
6204 ft gem Step: 5252 4,578.00 109,872.00
6208 STREET MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1128 3,135.00 75,240.00 128 6208 ft gem Step: 2128 3,291.00 78,984.00
6208 ft gem Step: 3128 3,451.00 82,824.00
6208 ft gem Step: 4128 3,623.00 86,952.00
6208 ft gem Step: 5128 3,807.00 91,368.00
6209 STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1129 2,340.00 56,160.00 129 6209 ft gem Step: 2129 2,458.00 58,992.00
6209 ft gem Step: 3129 2,579.00 61,896.00
6209 ft gem Step: 4129 2,709.00 65,016.00
6209 ft gem Step: 5129 2,843.00 68,232.00
6209 ft gem Step: 6129 2,985.00 71,640.00
6209 ft gem Step: 7129 3,136.00 75,264.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 31 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 76, Packet Page 345 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 9214 STREETS & UTILITIES OPERAT MGR ft mea Step: 1363 4,643.00 111,432.00 363 9214 ft mea Step: 2363 4,875.00 117,000.00
9214 ft mea Step: 3363 5,118.00 122,832.00
9214 ft mea Step: 4363 5,377.00 129,048.00
9214 ft mea Step: 5363 5,646.00 135,504.00
5308 SUSTAINABILITY ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1374 3,569.00 85,656.00 374 5308 ft gem Step: 2374 3,749.00 89,976.00
5308 ft gem Step: 3374 3,939.00 94,536.00
5308 ft gem Step: 4374 4,133.00 99,192.00
5308 ft gem Step: 5374 4,338.00 104,112.00
1295 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1365 5,100.00 122,400.00 365 1295 ft mea Step: 2365 5,355.00 128,520.00
1295 ft mea Step: 3365 5,623.00 134,952.00
1295 ft mea Step: 4365 5,906.00 141,744.00
1295 ft mea Step: 5365 6,203.00 148,872.00
1291 SYSTEMS AND NETWORK ADMIN ft mea Step: 1358 5,605.00 134,520.00 358 1291 ft mea Step: 2358 5,886.00 141,264.00
1291 ft mea Step: 3358 6,181.00 148,344.00
1291 ft mea Step: 4358 6,491.00 155,784.00
1291 ft mea Step: 5358 6,808.00 163,392.00
3103 TECHNOLOGY SVCS. SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1271 3,139.00 75,336.00 271 3103 ft gem Step: 2271 3,294.00 79,056.00
3103 ft gem Step: 3271 3,456.00 82,944.00
3103 ft gem Step: 4271 3,631.00 87,144.00
3103 ft gem Step: 5271 3,813.00 91,512.00
1253 URBAN FORESTER pt mea Step: 1321 4,298.00 103,152.00 321 1253 pt mea Step: 2321 4,515.00 108,360.00
1253 pt mea Step: 3321 4,738.00 113,712.00
1253 pt mea Step: 4321 4,974.00 119,376.00
1253 pt mea Step: 5321 5,226.00 125,424.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 32 of 32

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 77, Packet Page 346 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9373 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT rpt rpt 673Step: 1 30.30 673
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 2 31.81
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 3 33.42
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 4 35.08
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 5 36.85
9329 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT rpt rpt 643Step: 1 27.47 643 9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 2 28.84
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 3 30.29
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 4 31.81
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 5 33.42
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 6 35.08
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 7 36.85
9320 ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK ptsn pt 724Step: 1 21.02 724
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 2 22.07
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 3 23.17
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 4 24.33
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 5 25.55
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 6 26.83
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 7 28.17
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 8 29.58
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 9 31.06
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 10 32.61
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 1 of 23

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 78, Packet Page 347 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9523 AQUATICS SPECIALIST ptsn pt 579Step: 23 17.00 579
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 24 17.25
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 25 17.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 26 17.75
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 27 18.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 28 18.25
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 29 18.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 30 18.75
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 31 19.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 32 19.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 33 20.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 34 20.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 35 21.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 36 21.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 37 22.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 38 22.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 39 23.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 40 23.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 41 24.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 42 24.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 43 25.00
9999 AQUATICS SPECIALIST I ptrpt 000Step: 1 21.87 475
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 2 22.96
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 3 24.11
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 4 25.32
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 5 26.61
9534 ARTIFACT SPECIALIST ptpts 434Step: 1 19.39 434
9534 ptpts 434Step: 2 20.36
9534 ptpts 434Step: 3 21.38
9534 ptpts 434Step: 4 22.45
9534 ptpts 434Step: 5 23.57
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 2 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 79, Packet Page 348 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9545 CAMP COOK ptsn pt 542Step: 13 18.00 542
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 14 18.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 15 18.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 16 18.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 17 19.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 18 19.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 19 19.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 20 19.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 21 20.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 22 20.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 23 20.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 24 20.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 25 21.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 26 21.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 27 21.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 28 21.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 29 22.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 30 22.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 31 22.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 32 22.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 33 23.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 34 23.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 35 23.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 36 23.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 37 24.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 3 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 80, Packet Page 349 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9535 CAMP DIRECTOR/ASSIST CAMP DIR ptsn pt 605Step: 13 19.00 605 9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 14 19.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 15 19.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 16 19.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 17 20.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 18 20.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 19 20.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 20 20.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 21 21.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 22 21.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 23 21.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 24 21.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 25 22.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 26 22.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 27 22.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 28 22.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 29 23.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 30 23.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 31 23.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 32 23.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 33 24.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 34 24.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 35 24.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 36 24.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 37 25.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 4 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 81, Packet Page 350 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9243 COMMUNITY SVC OFFICER INTERN ptsn pt 480Step: 3 17.00 480 9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 4 18.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 5 19.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 6 20.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 7 21.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 8 22.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 9 23.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 10 24.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 11 25.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 12 26.00
CULTURAL ARTS ASSISTANT rpt Step: 1 29.49 639
rpt Step: 2 30.97
rpt Step: 3 32.52
rpt Step: 4 34.14
rpt Step: 5 35.88
9339 CUSTODIAN rpt rpt 471Step: 1 23.71 471
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 2 24.93
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 3 26.17
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 4 27.49
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 5 28.88
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 5 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 82, Packet Page 351 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9540 DESK ATTENDANT ptsn pt 583Step: 23 16.50 583
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 24 16.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 25 17.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 26 17.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 27 17.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 28 17.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 29 18.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 30 18.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 31 18.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 32 18.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 33 19.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 34 19.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 35 19.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 36 20.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 37 20.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 38 21.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 39 21.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 40 22.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 41 22.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 42 23.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 43 23.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 44 24.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 45 24.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 46 25.00
9546 EXTRA-HELP RETIRED ANNUITANT ptpts 410Step: 1 16.50 410 9546 ptpts 410Step: 5 78.46
9546 ptpts 410Step: 15 115.45
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 6 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 83, Packet Page 352 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9664 FACILITY ATTENDANT rpt rpt 545Step: 1 30.40 545
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 2 31.96
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 3 33.53
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 4 35.21
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 5 36.96
9421 FACILITY WORKER ptsn pt 510Step: 1 20.87 510
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 2 21.91
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 3 23.01
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 4 24.16
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 5 25.37
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 6 26.64
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 7 27.97
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 8 29.37
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 9 30.84
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 10 32.38
9216 FIRE INSPECTOR I ptpts 401Step: 1 32.19 401
9216 ptpts 401Step: 2 33.80
9216 ptpts 401Step: 3 35.49
9216 ptpts 401Step: 4 37.26
9216 ptpts 401Step: 5 39.13
9216 ptpts 401Step: 6 41.08
9216 ptpts 401Step: 7 43.14
9216 ptpts 401Step: 8 45.29
9216 ptpts 401Step: 9 47.56
9216 ptpts 401Step: 10 49.94
9419 GUEST SERVICES ATTENDANT ptsn pt 508Step: 1 23.36 508 9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 2 24.53
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 3 25.75
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 4 27.04
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 5 28.39
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 7 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 84, Packet Page 353 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9340 HARBOR ATTENDANT ptsn pt 725Step: 1 22.48 725
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 2 23.60
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 3 24.78
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 4 26.02
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 5 27.32
9615 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER rpt rpt 713Step: 1 31.54 713 9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 2 33.09
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 3 34.78
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 4 36.49
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 5 38.32
9221 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN ptsn pt 447Step: 1 25.81 447 9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 2 27.10
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 3 28.46
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 4 29.88
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 5 31.37
9413 INTERN ptsn pt 662Step: 3 17.00 662
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 4 18.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 5 19.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 6 20.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 7 21.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 8 22.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 9 23.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 10 24.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 11 25.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 12 26.00
9379 JANITORIAL WORKER ptsn pt 727Step: 1 17.76 727
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 2 18.65
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 3 19.58
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 4 20.56
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 5 21.59
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 8 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 85, Packet Page 354 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
LAUNDRY ATTENDANT rpt Step: 1 17.36 580
rpt Step: 2 18.18
rpt Step: 3 19.09
rpt Step: 4 20.04
rpt Step: 5 21.05
9526 LEAD PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR rpt rpt 525Step: 1 25.24 525 9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 2 26.48
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 3 27.82
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 4 29.21
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 5 30.65
LIBRARIAN rpt Step: 1 33.10 546
rpt Step: 2 34.79
rpt Step: 3 36.51
rpt Step: 4 38.35
rpt Step: 5 40.26
9515 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I rpt rpt 547Step: 1 28.09 547
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 2 29.52
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 3 30.97
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 4 32.54
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 5 34.14
9513 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II rpt rpt 548Step: 1 29.52 548
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 2 30.97
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 3 32.52
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 4 34.14
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 5 35.88
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 9 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 86, Packet Page 355 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9314 LIBRARY CLERK ptsn pt 716Step: 1 20.03 716
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 2 21.03
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 3 22.08
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 4 23.18
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 5 24.34
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 6 25.56
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 7 26.84
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 8 28.18
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 9 29.59
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 10 31.07
9311 LIBRARY PAGE ptpts 403Step: 3 16.70 403
9311 ptpts 403Step: 4 17.54
9311 ptpts 403Step: 5 18.42
9311 ptpts 403Step: 6 19.33
9311 ptpts 403Step: 7 20.29
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 10 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 87, Packet Page 356 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9524 LIFEGUARD rpt rpt 492Step: 1 17.75 492
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 2 18.55
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 3 19.54
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 4 20.50
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 5 21.54
9524 LIFEGUARD ptsn pt 578Step: 22 17.00 578
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 23 17.25
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 24 17.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 25 17.75
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 26 18.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 27 18.25
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 28 18.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 29 18.75
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 30 19.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 31 19.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 32 20.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 33 20.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 34 21.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 35 21.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 36 22.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 37 22.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 38 23.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 39 23.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 40 24.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 41 24.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 42 25.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 11 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 88, Packet Page 357 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9315 MAINTENANCE WORKER ptsn pt 717Step: 1 20.87 717
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 2 21.91
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 3 23.01
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 4 24.16
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 5 25.37
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 6 26.64
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 7 27.97
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 8 29.37
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 9 30.84
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 10 32.38
9350 MILITARY AFFAIRS COORDINATOR ptsn pt 712Step: 1 59.37 712 9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 2 62.34
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 3 65.46
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 4 68.73
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 5 72.16
9316 MUSEUM ATTENDANT ptsn pt 718Step: 3 16.67 718
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 4 17.51
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 5 18.38
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 6 19.30
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 7 20.27
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 8 21.28
9342 PARK ASSISTANT ptsn pt 719Step: 1 22.46 719
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 2 23.58
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 3 24.76
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 4 26.00
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 5 27.30
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 12 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 89, Packet Page 358 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9665 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER rpt rpt 482Step: 1 31.54 482 9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 2 33.09
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 3 34.78
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 4 36.49
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 5 38.32
9343 PARKING ENFORCEMENT REPRESENT ptsn pt 720Step: 1 22.48 720 9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 2 23.60
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 3 24.78
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 4 26.02
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 5 27.32
6619 PARKING FACILITY ATTENDANT ptsn pt 715Step: 2 17.15 715 6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 3 18.00
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 4 18.90
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 5 19.85
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 6 20.84
9662 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV rpt rpt 714Step: 1 29.47 714 9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 2 30.96
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 3 32.49
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 4 34.11
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 5 35.84
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 13 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 90, Packet Page 359 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9582 PERSONAL TRAINER ptsn pt 728Step: 1 20.00 728
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 2 21.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 3 22.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 4 23.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 5 24.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 6 25.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 7 26.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 8 27.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 9 28.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 10 29.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 11 30.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 12 31.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 13 32.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 14 33.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 15 34.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 16 35.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 17 36.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 18 37.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 19 38.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 20 39.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 21 40.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 22 41.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 23 42.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 24 43.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 25 44.00
9518 PHYSICAL THERAPIST rpt rpt 535Step: 1 55.55 535
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 2 58.32
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 3 61.26
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 4 64.30
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 5 67.52
9313 POLICE RECRUIT ptsn pt 486Step: 1 45.61 486
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 14 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 91, Packet Page 360 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9341 PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 721Step: 5 20.00 721
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 6 20.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 7 20.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 8 20.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 9 21.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 10 21.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 11 21.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 12 21.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 13 22.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 14 22.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 15 22.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 16 22.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 17 23.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 18 23.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 19 23.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 20 23.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 21 24.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 22 24.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 23 24.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 24 24.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 25 25.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 26 25.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 27 25.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 28 25.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 29 26.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 15 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 92, Packet Page 361 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9422 RECREATION ASSISTANT ptsn pt 722Step: 1 20.00 722
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 2 21.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 3 22.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 4 23.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 5 24.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 6 25.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 7 26.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 8 27.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 9 28.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 10 29.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 11 30.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 12 31.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 13 32.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 14 33.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 15 34.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 16 35.00
9528 RECREATION SPECIALIST rpt rpt 476Step: 1 27.32 476 9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 2 28.69
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 3 30.13
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 4 31.64
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 5 33.25
9321 REFERENCE/CHILDRENS LIBRARIAN ptsn pt 723Step: 1 27.37 723 9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 2 28.74
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 3 30.18
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 4 31.69
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 5 33.27
9411 RESERVE POLICE OFFICER ptpts 412Step: 1 50.19 412
9411 ptpts 412Step: 2 52.70
9411 ptpts 412Step: 3 55.33
9411 ptpts 412Step: 4 58.10
9411 ptpts 412Step: 5 61.01
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 16 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 93, Packet Page 362 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9416 SENIOR AQUATICS SPECIALIST ptsn pt 505Step: 1 34.35 505 9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 2 36.07
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 3 37.87
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 4 39.76
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 5 41.75
9417 SENIOR FACILITY SPECIALIST ptsn pt 506Step: 1 34.35 506 9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 2 36.07
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 3 37.87
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 4 39.76
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 5 41.75
9519 SITE DIRECTOR/AFTERSCHOOL rpt rpt 513Step: 1 19.80 513 9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 2 20.80
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 3 21.85
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 4 22.92
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 5 24.09
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 17 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 94, Packet Page 363 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 617Step: 1 20.00 617 9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 2 21.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 3 22.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 4 23.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 5 24.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 6 25.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 7 26.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 8 27.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 9 28.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 10 29.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 11 30.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 12 31.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 13 32.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 14 33.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 15 34.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 16 35.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 17 36.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 18 37.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 19 38.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 20 39.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 21 40.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 22 41.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 23 42.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 24 43.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 25 44.00
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 619Step: 1 45.00 619 9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 2 46.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 3 47.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 4 48.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 5 49.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 6 50.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 7 51.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 18 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 95, Packet Page 364 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 619Step: 8 52.00 619 9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 9 53.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 10 54.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 11 55.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 12 56.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 13 57.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 14 58.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 15 59.00
9537 SPORTS OFFICIAL ptsn pt 560Step: 1 17.00 560
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 2 18.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 3 19.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 4 20.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 5 21.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 6 22.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 7 23.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 8 24.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 9 25.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 10 26.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 11 27.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 12 28.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 13 29.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 14 30.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 15 31.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 16 32.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 17 33.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 18 34.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 19 35.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 19 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 96, Packet Page 365 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9548 SR REC LEADER/REC LEADER ptsn pt 729Step: 13 18.00 729 9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 14 18.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 15 18.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 16 18.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 17 19.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 18 19.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 19 19.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 20 19.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 21 20.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 22 20.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 23 20.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 24 20.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 25 21.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 26 21.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 27 21.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 28 21.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 29 22.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 30 22.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 31 22.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 32 22.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 33 23.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 34 23.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 35 23.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 36 23.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 37 24.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 20 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 97, Packet Page 366 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9322 SUPPORT ANALYST ptsn pt 726Step: 1 33.98 726
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 2 35.68
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 3 37.46
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 4 39.34
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 5 41.30
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 6 43.37
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 7 45.54
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 8 47.81
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 9 50.20
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 10 52.71
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 11 55.35
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 12 58.12
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 13 61.02
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 14 64.07
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 15 67.28
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 21 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 98, Packet Page 367 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9527 SUPPORT PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 502Step: 19 17.50 502 9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 20 17.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 21 18.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 22 18.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 23 18.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 24 18.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 25 19.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 26 19.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 27 19.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 28 19.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 29 20.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 30 20.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 31 20.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 32 20.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 33 21.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 34 21.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 35 21.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 36 21.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 37 22.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 38 22.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 39 22.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 40 22.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 41 23.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 42 23.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 43 23.50
TOT ACTIVITY LEADER rpt Step: 1 19.80 491
rpt Step: 2 20.80
rpt Step: 3 21.85
rpt Step: 4 22.92
rpt Step: 5 24.09
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 22 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 99, Packet Page 368 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9831 WHARF ATTENDANT ptpts 705Step: 1 21.51 705
9831 ptpts 705Step: 2 22.59
9831 ptpts 705Step: 3 23.71
9831 ptpts 705Step: 4 24.90
9831 ptpts 705Step: 5 26.15
9716 WHARF ATTENDANT rpt rpt 707Step: 1 29.31 707
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 2 30.75
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 3 32.28
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 4 33.90
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 5 35.61
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 23 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 13., Item Page 100, Packet Page 369 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approve the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan, Authorize the Finance Director to Make Any Necessary Administrative Budget Transfers for Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects for FY 2025/26, and Reappropriate Capital Improvement Program Closeout Project Budget Savings in the Amount of $11,295,940 to Various Active Capital Improvement Program Projects (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, 15302, 15306, Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061 or Initial Study Mitigated Negative Previously Prepared and Certified) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt resolutions:

1. Approving the recommended Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan;

2. Authorizing the Finance Director, or their
designee, to make any necessary administrative
budget transfers, none of which may individually
exceed $350,000, between projects with the
same funding source during the fiscal period of
July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026; and

3. Authorizing the Finance Director, or their
designee, to reappropriate Capital Improvement
Program Closeout Project Budget Savings in the
Amount of $11,295,940 to Various Active Capital
Improvement Program Projects.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing;
and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements,
visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and
community partnerships.

Protect and preserve our natural environment by
Agenda Report Highlights
 City Council is recommended to
approve the Five-Year Capital
Improvement Plan and authorize
budget transfers and
reappropriation of $11,295,940 to
critical projects.
 Funding for FY 2025/26 CIP
projects totals $21,900,049 across
nine restricted funding sources, with
no General Fund allocation
available except for revenues
allocated for the Sports Center.
 Infrastructure needs include $26
million in critical maintenance and
$49 million for right-of-way
improvements over the next five
years.
 Deferred maintenance risks longterm deterioration, with Measure S funding for streets and sidewalks
set to expire in 2027.

Date: 6/3/2025
Item No.: 14.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 370 №11/24
addressing climate change through ecologically responsible and pragmatic solutions.

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and abilities to bike and walk safely through active transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The recommended action is consistent with established policy and procedures for adopting the annual City budget and approving the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project list. On May 13, 2025, the Planning Commission determined all existing and new proposed projects in the CIP to be consistent with the General Plan, Area Plans, Master Plans, Coastal Plans, Traffic Calming Plans, and Move Monterey Multimodal Plan. None of the proposed FY 2025/26 projects required review by the Parks and Recreation Department.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The proposed Fiscal Year 2025/26 CIP projects will be funded by nine (9) funding sources, as shown in the following table:

The appropriation for the funding has been included in the proposed FY 2025/26 budget as listed above. The full list of projects recommended for funding approval separated by funding source is attached as Exhibit A.

In addition to the proposed funding allocations above, City Staff have prepared 15 CIP projects that can be closed or funding reduced and reallocated to other critical and/or new projects. See Exhibit B for distribution details. Below is a summary of the total amount per funding source:

Funding Source
No. of
Proposed
Projects
Budget
FY 25/26
General Fund 0 $ 0
Monterey Sports Center – Facility Fees (General
Fund)
1 $ 200,000
Monterey Sports Center Reserve Fund (General Fund) 1 $ 650,000 Gas Tax (Highway User Tax) 1 $ 863,942
Road Maintenance & Rehab (SB1) 1 $ 90,779
Tidelands Fund 1 $ 350,000
Sewer Fund 3 $ 900,000
Parking Fund 7 $ 1,600,000
Measure S 4 $15,753,781
Measure X 4 $ 1,491,547
Total 29 $21,900,049
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 371 №11/24
Funding Source Amount*
General Fund $ 300,000
Marina Fund $ 1,057,665
Gas Tax (HUTA) Fund $ 2,442,707
Road Maintenance and Rehab (SB1) Fund $ 4,494,161
Tidelands Fund $ 1,036,492
Parking Fund $ 1,964,914
Total $ 11,295,940
*Project balances as of May 7, 2025
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the following actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Sections 15301, 15302, 15306, and Classes 1, 2, and 6) because the proposed actions involve the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, mechanical equipment or topographical features involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination; the replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities, where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced; or basic data collection, research, experimental management, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource (these may be strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted, or funded).

Furthermore, projects found to be exempt do not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exemption a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1 or 31. The projects which are exempt under Class 6 would have no effect on the environment because they consist of studies and informationgathering only.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The projects have a limited scope. Therefore, no cumulative impacts are anticipated.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated to be found at the project sites. The projects would not have a significant effect due to their limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 372 №11/24
rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The projects would not be visible from scenic highways; therefore, no impacts to scenic highways would occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. None of these projects would be located on hazardous waste sites listed pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. None of the projects exempt under CEQA would involve historic properties; therefore, there would be no impacts to historic resources. Those projects exempt under Class 6 would have no effect on historic resources because they consist of studies and information-gathering only. Some of the projects which are exempt under Class 1 and 2 may be in a sensitive archeological area as shown in the General Plan EIR (Figure 8, Archeological Sensitivity Map); however, these projects would require either no excavation or minimal excavation of previously disturbed ground; no improvements in native soil. Therefore, projects which are exempt under Class 1 and 2 would not affect historic or archaeological resources. In the case of an inadvertent archaeological discovery at any of the project sites, the City’s typical archaeological procedures shall be followed, making impacts to archaeological resources less than significant.

These exempt projects include:

Exempt Projects: CEQA Exemption
(Article, Section,
Class):

ADA Transition Plan Improvements (30c1211) – funding act Not a Project CW-Del Monte Ave-Undergrounding Utility – information Gathering (30c1702)
19, 15306, 6
Fire Storage Building Repair (30c1950) – information Gathering 19, 15306, 6 CW-Sewer-Root Foaming (33c1501) – funding act Not a Project Measure S-Storm Drains (33c1554) – funding act Not a Project Sewer Repair and Rehab (33c1750) – funding act Not a Project Sewer Line Video Evaluation (33c1805) – funding act Not a Project Tunnel Repairs (35c1801) – funding act Not a Project
Critical Maintenance (35c1850) – funding act Not a Project Identified Safety Projects (35c1851) – funding act Not a Project City Facilities Repairs & Upgrades (36c1803) – funding act Not a Project Citywide Adaptive Measure X (37c2050) – funding act Not a Project Marina Dredging (63c1103) – funding act Not a Project
Coast Guard Pier Reuse Project (63c1754) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Replace Marina “K” Tier Dock (64c1605) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Wharf 1 ADA Improvements (64c1806) - construction 19, 15301, 1 Wharf 2 Warehouse Exterior Rehab (64c1807) – construction 19, 15301, 1 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 373 №11/24
6 Fisherman Wharf Repairs (64c1808) - construction 19, 15302, 2 Waterfront Parking Resurface/Stripe/ADA (65c1330) - construction 19, 15302, 2 Parking Meter Upgrades (cip2002) – funding act Not a Project Pay Station Upgrades (cip2003) – funding act Not a Project Tiba Parking Systems Equipment Replacement - implementation 19, 15301, 1 Waterfront Parking Lot Resurface/Restripe (cip2005) - construction 19, 15302, 2 Operational Improvements to Trans System (cip2012) – funding act Not a Project Traffic System Pedestrian and Bike Upgrade (cip2101) – funding act Not a Project Police/Fire Gate (cip2302)- information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Fire Station 13 Tower Demo (cip2303) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Monterey Sports Center Repairs and Upgrades (cip2304) - construction
19, 15301, 1
Sign Replacement Program (cip2305) - implementation 19, 15301, 1 Annual Fog Inspection Program (cip2308) – implementation 19, 15306, 6 Lake El Estero Stormwater Diversion to Sanitary Sewer (cip2310) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Open Channel O&M Environmental Services (cip2311) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
SD Utility – Repair and Maintenance Program (cip2312) – funding act Not a Project Parking Lot Signage (cip2313) – funding act Not a Project Parking Facility Electronic Signage (cip2314) – funding act Not a Project ALPR for Enforcement Scooters (cip2315) – funding act Not a Project Parking Garage Security Cameras (cip2316) – funding act Not a Project Replace Parking Garage Lighting (cip2317) – funding act Not a Project 30 Fisherman’s Wharf Roof Repair (cip2319) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bicycle Pedestrian (cip2320) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Monterey Conference Center Backup Generator (cip2401) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Monterey Sports Center Backup Generator (cip2402) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Hilltop Sewer Line Replacement (cip2403) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Hilltop Roof Replacement (cip2405) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Monterey Tennis Center Upgrades (cip2406) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Police Men’s Bathroom (cip2409) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Utility Flow Level Monitoring (cip2410) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Tunnel Maintenance and Repair (cip2412) – funding act Not a Project Local Road Safety Plan Grant (cip2413) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 CW-Monterey Sports Center Natatorium Dehumidifier Replacement (cip2414) - construction
19, 15302, 2
Wharf II Repairs (cip2415) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 374 №11/24
Olivier Street Stormwater Diversion (cip2416) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Madison/Herrmann/Larkin Safety Improvements (cip2422) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Prop 68 – Per Capita Grant Program (prop68) – construction to existing facility
19, 15301, 1
Wharf 1 Repairs and Upgrades (cip2501) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Wharf 1 Fire Suppression System Upgrades (cip2502) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
City Facilities ADA Upgrades – (cip2503) – funding act Not a Project Fire Station 11/Monterey Police Department Repairs & Upgrades (cip2504) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Monterey Sports Center Roof Repairs (cip2505) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Parking ADA Upgrades (cip2507) – funding act Not a Project Pump Station 11 Repairs (cip2508) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Lake El Estero Multi-Use Path (cip2509) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 E Franklin St. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements (cip2510) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Multi-Modal Plan Implementation (cip2511) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Fire Station 12 Repairs & Upgrades (cip2512) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Fire Station 13 Repairs & Upgrades (cip2513) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
City Parks ADA Upgrades (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Monterey Sports Center Boiler Replacements (NEW) – construction 19, 15302, 2 Gas Tax Right-of-Way Maintenance (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Foam Street Rehabilitation and Signal Upgrades (NEW) –
information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Franklin Street Rehabilitation (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Cass and El Dorado Street Curb Ramp and Road Rehabilitation (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Harbormaster Restroom Project (NEW) – construction to existing facility, information gathering
19, 15302, 2
Parking Lot Maintenance (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Parking Garage Maintenance (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Calle Principal Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Cannery Row Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Downtown East Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 6, Packet Page 375 №11/24
Downtown West Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Parking Office Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Cannery Row Surface Lot Repairs (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Downtown Surface Lots Repairs (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 El Estero Park Center Parking Lot Repairs (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Library Parking Lot Repairs (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Calle Principal Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
28 of the CIP programs listed above are not a project as defined by CEQA. The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
45 of the CIP programs listed above are for information gathering only. The City of Monterey ----determined that the proposed action is solely just information gathering for this stage of the project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

For the remaining projects listed below that are in the construction or implementation phase, project-specific environmental review will be conducted as projects are proposed. As currently conceived, the projects are consistent with the City’s plans, and project-specific impacts could be reduced to a less-than-significant level through project design and specifications.

Further Review Required:

CW-Conference Center Renovation (30c1453)
Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update (33c1804)
Measure S – Sidewalks (35c1552)
Measure S – Pavement (35c1553)
Measure S – ADA (35c1555)
Marina Structural Repairs and Replacement (cip2006)
Median Upgrades (cip2306)
SSMP Update and Biennial Audit (cip2309)
Monterey Conference Center Cooling Towers (cip2318)
Programmatic Wharf Inspections & Maintenance (NEW)
Measure P/S Street Maintenance – 5 Year Streets List (33c1554, 33c1552, 35c1553, 35c1555, NEW)
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 7, Packet Page 376 №11/24
Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Adopted:

Wharf II Critical Repairs and Parking Area (30c1354) – IS-MND adopted by City Council on October 28, 2014 (Resolution P14-044).

CW-951 Del Monte Ave-Groundwater Remediation (33c1454) – IS-MND adopted by City Council Resolution on April 19, 2016 (Resolution 16-061).

CAL FIRE Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Grant (cip2423) – Supplemental IS-MND adopted by City Council on October 25, 2022 (Resolution P22-024).

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The purpose of this report is to present the final list of proposed projects to the City Council.

Council may make additional revisions to the proposed projects and/or remove projects. Council could also choose not to reappropriate Capital Improvement Program funds and de-appropriate projects, returning funds to the respective ending balances; however, this is not recommended.

The recommended transfers allow staff to continue to utilize those funds for the completion of critical Capital Projects, for which no General Funds are available in the FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program.

DISCUSSION:

There are 23 projects proposed for funding in FY 2025/26 which represent a wide array of infrastructure needs. Continuing the Five-Year Plan introduced last year, the proposed project list for FY 2025/26 will focus on long-term Citywide programs to address critical infrastructure.

The full list of projects recommended for funding approval separated by funding source is attached as Exhibit A.

The City’s Finance Budget team has determined that, aside from the $850,000 that is recommended for allocation from the Monterey Sports Center’s Reserves and Facilities Fee, no funding is available for the Capital Improvement Program from the General Fund in FY 2025/26.

In FY 2024/25, only $2.5 million was allocated, representing just 2.3% of the General Fund. In comparison, other cities allocate a much higher percentage of their General Fund to their CIP, with amounts ranging from 13% in the City of Seaside to 25% in the City of San Luis Obispo. At this funding level, the Five-Year Capital Improvement Program will only include projects that represent the most critical needs. With no unrestricted General Funds available this fiscal year, funding for critical projects had to be deferred to subsequent fiscal years.

The City invested $2 million in General Funds in FY 2024/25 for the repair and upgrade of the City’s Municipal Wharves; in total, the City will invest approximately $4 million over five years for Wharf 1 and 2 Repairs and replacement of the Wharf 1 Fire Suppression System.

Based on a 2024 inspection by the City’s Wharves Engineering consultant, COWI, Wharf 2 is in “poor condition” and has major deterioration or overstressing on widespread portions of the structure. Wooden structures in marine environments face variable deterioration rates. Some elements may be identified as minor and escalate to immediate within a short time frame, whereas some may be identified as major but remain in this condition for a lengthy duration.

This most recent inspection resulted in emergency deck repairs at a cost of $1.3 million, critical Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 8, Packet Page 377 №11/24
pile repairs estimated to cost roughly $100,000, and in future additional upcoming projects to address moderate and major damage across the entire structure.

At nearly 100 years old, Wharf 2 is well past its intended lifespan. The City’s programmatic repair and maintenance program, funded through the Tidelands Fund, only addresses the identified critical maintenance needs; the repairs do not strengthen the wharf. This program costs approximately $3 million every program cycle of assessment and repair (every three to five years). This maintenance strategy can be said to be a “band-aid” approach. This approach has an unknown lifespan and associated risks. Keeping the status quo will no longer be an option. City Council received a presentation by staff and COWI at the April 15th regular meeting.

Recent Facility Condition Assessments revealed nearly $26 million in critical maintenance needs over the next five years alone, from roof repairs to HVAC and electrical updates.

Monterey's right-of-way infrastructure, including streets, sidewalks, traffic signals, and curb ramps, requires over $49 million investment in the next five years to maintain safe and accessible public spaces.

Prior to the adoption of Measure P in 2015, the City’s overall pavement condition index ("PCI”) was independently rated 54 out of 100, which categorized Monterey’s street system as “At Risk,” only five points away from a “Poor” rating. After ten years of investment through Measure P and S, the City’s PCI is now 80 out of 100, which is categorized as “Very Good.” The City has adequate funding through Measure S to complete significant street and sidewalk improvements for the next couple of years; however, Measure S sunsets in March of 2027, and the City must invest an average of $5 million to $6 million dollars per year to maintain our streets or risk having City streets deteriorate. If this does not happen, the achieved success in our investment into our streets will be short-lived and roadway disrepair will be inevitable. Delayed maintenance often leads to more extensive and expensive repairs in the future, exacerbating budgetary pressures. It is important to note that capital project costs continue to increase due to Federal and State mandates, including ADA and storm water regulations, as well as inflation.

The funds proposed to be used to complete the recommended projects are Gas Tax Revenue (Highway User Tax-HUTA), SB-1 Revenue (Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation AccountRMRA), Tidelands Fund, Sewer Fund, Parking Fund, Measure S Fund, Measure X Funds, Monterey Sports Center Facility Maintenance Fees, and Monterey Sports Center Reserve.

These funding sources have restrictions for the types of infrastructure rehabilitation that can be completed. As an example, the City is restricted from using Gas Tax (Highway User TaxHUTA) revenue for expenditures on City buildings. The attached list contains a brief description and preliminary estimates for each item. Each project will be individually analyzed for cost and contingency as specific projects are awarded.

Reappropriate CIP Project Funding
Public Works Department Staff are continuously auditing funded and active CIP projects. Staff reviewed the current CIP list and identified 15 projects to be closed and/or combined with active projects. Due to inflation and rising construction costs, projects approved in prior budget cycles often do not have sufficient funding to complete the project. In addition, the limited amount of unrestricted General Funds allocated for the FY 2025/26 CIP requires that Staff re-prioritize and reallocate approved funding to the most critical and urgent projects, to ensure that there is sufficient funding for completion. The full list of projects recommended for re-appropriation and close out, separated by funding source, is attached as Exhibit B.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 9, Packet Page 378 №11/24
Due to the restricted nature of the majority of funding sources, staff is requesting that the funds be placed in projects with identical funding requirements. In some cases, projects may be funded through a combination of sources when their scope qualifies for multiple funding programs. In total, the 15 projects represent an approved budget of $19,998,683 and a reallocated amount of $11,295,940. This funding was previously approved and appropriated for the CIP projects listed in the attachment. This action allows staff to utilize those funds for the completion of critical and urgent Capital Projects, for which no funding is available in the FY 2025-26 Capital Improvement Program.

Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan
This five-year Capital Improvement Plan (Plan) is the vision for short- and long-range development, maintenance, improvement and building of assets to benefit our residents, businesses, property owners and visitors. It provides a link between the General Plan, various master planning documents and budget, and provides a means for planning, scheduling and implementing capital projects over the next five years.

A Capital Improvement Plan provides a long-term approach for prioritizing and selecting projects. Although the plan document is updated annually, it allows the public to review projects planned over the five-year timeframe and provides an overview of work in progress. The Plan is intended to incorporate the City’s investments in infrastructure, rehabilitation, development, and maintenance (i.e., capital improvements) with other significant capital expenditures that add to, or strategically invest in, the City’s assets.

The adoption of the five-year Capital Improvement Plan is neither a firm commitment to a particular project nor a limitation to a particular cost because funding assumptions are made for years 2 through 5. As a basic tool for prioritizing and scheduling anticipated capital projects and capital financing, the Plan is a key element in planning and managing capital funds. The Plan consists of two parts: the one-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) (Year 1 of the Plan), and the capital investment plan (Years 2 through 5 of the Plan). Only the first year of the Plan represents a funding commitment for the projects to proceed to the next stage, or to be implemented depending on the level of funding appropriated.

After adoption of the CIP, Public Works staff will publish a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Book (in draft form as Attachment 4) on the City’s website. Publishing a public-facing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) document is crucial for fostering transparency, accountability, and community engagement. By making this information accessible to the public, stakeholders such as residents, businesses, and other government agencies, gain insight into the priorities and investments shaping their community's development. Ultimately, a publicly available CIP document not only informs residents about upcoming improvements but also empowers them to participate in shaping the future of their neighborhoods and cities. In addition to providing information regarding the development of the CIP Program, the document will include individual project pages that provide a variety of information about the City’s CIP projects.

Striking a balance between the infrastructure needs and the financial capacity of the City is a challenging process. Foregoing or deferring capital improvements is often a response to limited resources and constrained financial times. The City can no longer continue to defer critical maintenance and must prioritize the highest need infrastructure projects or risk these assets deteriorating beyond repair. Because of the limited amount of unrestricted General Funds available for the CIP over the next five years, efforts continue to identify additional funding Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 10, Packet Page 379 №11/24
through federal and state resources, as well as the continued evaluation of effective and efficient use of the limited resources available to the City. Staff continue seeking alternative funding opportunities and approaches to address the funding gaps, including local, state, and federal grants.

However, relying heavily on grant funding for complex, multi-year capital improvements is illadvised due to its inherently competitive and unreliable nature. The intense competition for limited grant funds means there's no guarantee of success, making it a precarious foundation for critical long-term financial planning.

Ultimately, addressing the City’s growing infrastructure needs will require difficult decisions, strategic prioritization, and more reliable funding to avoid further deterioration and long-term consequences for our community.

AR/mb
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A: Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan

3. Exhibit B: Capital Project Budget Transfer List

4. Draft Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Book
e: Rafaela King, Finance Director
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 11, Packet Page 380 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, AUTHORIZE THE

FINANCE DIRECTOR TO MAKE ANY NECESSARY ADMINISTRATIVE BUDGET

TRANSFERS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) PROJECTS FOR FY 2025/26, AND REAPPROPRIATE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CLOSEOUT PROJECT BUDGET SAVINGS IN THE AMOUNT OF $11,295,940 TO VARIOUS ACTIVE

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS
WHEREAS, on May 13, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects included in the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan are Consistent with the General Plan, Area Plans, Master Plans, Coastal Plans, Traffic Calming Plans, and Move Monterey Multimodal Plan; WHEREAS, none of the proposed projects required review by the Parks and Recreation Commission under City Code section 2-6.01(d) for consistency with the Parks and Recreation Master Plan;
WHEREAS, Staff reviewed the current CIP list and identified 15 projects that can be closed and/or combined with active projects;
WHEREAS, as a basic tool for prioritizing and scheduling anticipated capital projects and capital financing, the Capital Improvement Plan (Plan) is a key element in planning and managing future debt service requirements. The CIP Plan consists of two parts: the one-year Capital Budget Improvement Program (CIP) (Year 1 of the Plan), and the capital investment plan (Years 2-5 of the Plan). Only the first year of the Plan represents a funding commitment for the projects to proceed to the next stage, or to be implemented depending on the level of funding provided; and, WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the following actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Sections 15301, 15302, 15306, and Classes 1, 2, and 6) because the proposed actions involve the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, mechanical equipment or topographical features involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination; the replacement or reconstruction of existing structures and facilities, where the new structure will be located on the same site as the structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the structure replaced; or basic data collection, research, experimental management, and resource evaluation activities which do not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource (these may be strictly for information gathering purposes, or as part of a study leading to an action which a public agency has not yet approved, adopted, or funded).

Furthermore, projects found to be exempt do not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 12, Packet Page 381 to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exemption a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1 or 31. The projects which are exempt under Class 6 would have no effect on the environment because they consist of studies and informationgathering only.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The projects have a limited scope. Therefore, no cumulative impacts are anticipated.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated to be found at the project sites. The projects would not have a significant effect due to their limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The projects would not be visible from scenic highways; therefore, no impacts to scenic highways would occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. None of these projects would be located on hazardous waste sites listed pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. None of the projects exempt under CEQA would involve historic properties; therefore, there would be no impacts to historic resources. Those projects exempt under Class 6 would have no effect on historic resources because they consist of studies and information-gathering only. Some of the projects which are exempt under Class 1 and 2 may be in a sensitive archeological area as shown in the General Plan EIR (Figure 8, Archeological Sensitivity Map); however, these projects would require either no excavation or minimal excavation of previously disturbed ground; no improvements in native soil. Therefore, projects which are exempt under Class 1 and 2 would not affect historic or archaeological resources. In the case of an inadvertent archaeological discovery at any of the project sites, the City’s typical archaeological procedures shall be followed, making impacts to archaeological resources less than significant.

These exempt projects include:

Exempt Projects: CEQA Exemption
(Article, Section,
Class):

ADA Transition Plan Improvements (30c1211) – funding act Not a Project Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 13, Packet Page 382 CW-Del Monte Ave-Undergrounding Utility – information Gathering (30c1702)
19, 15306, 6
Fire Storage Building Repair (30c1950) – information Gathering 19, 15306, 6 CW-Sewer-Root Foaming (33c1501) – funding act Not a Project Measure S-Storm Drains (33c1554) – funding act Not a Project Sewer Repair and Rehab (33c1750) – funding act Not a Project Sewer Line Video Evaluation (33c1805) – funding act Not a Project Tunnel Repairs (35c1801) – funding act Not a Project
Critical Maintenance (35c1850) – funding act Not a Project Identified Safety Projects (35c1851) – funding act Not a Project City Facilities Repairs & Upgrades (36c1803) – funding act Not a Project Citywide Adaptive Measure X (37c2050) – funding act Not a Project Marina Dredging (63c1103) – funding act Not a Project
Coast Guard Pier Reuse Project (63c1754) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Replace Marina “K” Tier Dock (64c1605) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Wharf 1 ADA Improvements (64c1806) - construction 19, 15301, 1 Wharf 2 Warehouse Exterior Rehab (64c1807) – construction 19, 15301, 1 6 Fisherman Wharf Repairs (64c1808) - construction 19, 15302, 2 Waterfront Parking Resurface/Stripe/ADA (65c1330) - construction 19, 15302, 2 Parking Meter Upgrades (cip2002) – funding act Not a Project Pay Station Upgrades (cip2003) – funding act Not a Project Tiba Parking Systems Equipment Replacement - implementation 19, 15301, 1 Waterfront Parking Lot Resurface/Restripe (cip2005) - construction 19, 15302, 2 Operational Improvements to Trans System (cip2012) – funding act Not a Project Traffic System Pedestrian and Bike Upgrade (cip2101) – funding act Not a Project Police/Fire Gate (cip2302)- information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Fire Station 13 Tower Demo (cip2303) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Monterey Sports Center Repairs and Upgrades (cip2304) - construction
19, 15301, 1
Sign Replacement Program (cip2305) - implementation 19, 15301, 1 Annual Fog Inspection Program (cip2308) – implementation 19, 15306, 6 Lake El Estero Stormwater Diversion to Sanitary Sewer (cip2310) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Open Channel O&M Environmental Services (cip2311) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
SD Utility – Repair and Maintenance Program (cip2312) – funding act
Not a Project
Parking Lot Signage (cip2313) – funding act Not a Project Parking Facility Electronic Signage (cip2314) – funding act Not a Project Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 14, Packet Page 383 ALPR for Enforcement Scooters (cip2315) – funding act Not a Project Parking Garage Security Cameras (cip2316) – funding act Not a Project Replace Parking Garage Lighting (cip2317) – funding act Not a Project 30 Fisherman’s Wharf Roof Repair (cip2319) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bicycle Pedestrian (cip2320) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Monterey Conference Center Backup Generator (cip2401) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Monterey Sports Center Backup Generator (cip2402) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Hilltop Sewer Line Replacement (cip2403) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Hilltop Roof Replacement (cip2405) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Monterey Tennis Center Upgrades (cip2406) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Police Men’s Bathroom (cip2409) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Utility Flow Level Monitoring (cip2410) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Tunnel Maintenance and Repair (cip2412) – funding act Not a Project Local Road Safety Plan Grant (cip2413) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 CW-Monterey Sports Center Natatorium Dehumidifier Replacement (cip2414) - construction
19, 15302, 2
Wharf II Repairs (cip2415) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Olivier Street Stormwater Diversion (cip2416) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Madison/Herrmann/Larkin Safety Improvements (cip2422) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Prop 68 – Per Capita Grant Program (prop68) – construction to existing facility
19, 15301, 1
Wharf 1 Repairs and Upgrades (cip2501) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Wharf 1 Fire Suppression System Upgrades (cip2502) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
City Facilities ADA Upgrades – (cip2503) – funding act Not a Project Fire Station 11/Monterey Police Department Repairs & Upgrades (cip2504) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Monterey Sports Center Roof Repairs (cip2505) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Parking ADA Upgrades (cip2507) – funding act Not a Project Pump Station 11 Repairs (cip2508) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Lake El Estero Multi-Use Path (cip2509) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 E Franklin St. Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements (cip2510) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Multi-Modal Plan Implementation (cip2511) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 15, Packet Page 384 Fire Station 12 Repairs & Upgrades (cip2512) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Fire Station 13 Repairs & Upgrades (cip2513) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
City Parks ADA Upgrades (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Monterey Sports Center Boiler Replacements (NEW) – construction 19, 15302, 2 Gas Tax Right-of-Way Maintenance (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Foam Street Rehabilitation and Signal Upgrades (NEW) –
information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Franklin Street Rehabilitation (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Cass and El Dorado Street Curb Ramp and Road Rehabilitation (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Harbormaster Restroom Project (NEW) – construction to existing facility, information gathering
19, 15302, 2
Parking Lot Maintenance (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Parking Garage Maintenance (NEW) – funding act Not a Project Calle Principal Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Cannery Row Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Downtown East Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Downtown West Garage Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Parking Office Repairs & Upgrades (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Cannery Row Surface Lot Repairs (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Downtown Surface Lots Repairs (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 El Estero Park Center Parking Lot Repairs (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
Library Parking Lot Repairs (NEW) – information gathering 19, 15306, 6 Calle Principal Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project (NEW) – information gathering
19, 15306, 6
28 of the CIP programs listed above are not a project as defined by CEQA. The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 16, Packet Page 385 foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.
45 of the CIP programs listed above are for information gathering only. The City of Monterey ----determined that the proposed action is solely just information gathering for this stage of the project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

For the remaining projects listed below that are in the construction or implementation phase, project-specific environmental review will be conducted as projects are proposed. As currently conceived, the projects are consistent with the City’s plans, and project-specific impacts could be reduced to a less-than-significant level through project design and specifications.

Further Review Required:

CW-Conference Center Renovation (30c1453)
Sanitary Sewer Master Plan Update (33c1804)
Measure S – Sidewalks (35c1552)
Measure S – Pavement (35c1553)
Measure S – ADA (35c1555)
Marina Structural Repairs and Replacement (cip2006)
Median Upgrades (cip2306)
SSMP Update and Biennial Audit (cip2309)
Monterey Conference Center Cooling Towers (cip2318)
Programmatic Wharf Inspections & Maintenance (NEW)
Measure P/S Street Maintenance – 5 Year Streets List (33c1554, 33c1552, 35c1553, 35c1555, NEW)
Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration Adopted:

Wharf II Critical Repairs and Parking Area (30c1354) – IS-MND adopted by City Council on October 28, 2014 (Resolution P14-044).

CW-951 Del Monte Ave-Groundwater Remediation (33c1454) – IS-MND adopted by City Council Resolution on April 19, 2016 (Resolution 16-061).

CAL FIRE Greenbelt Fuel Reduction Grant (cip2423) – Supplemental IS-MND adopted by City Council on October 25, 2022 (Resolution P22-024).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approves the recommended Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (Plan) for Fiscal Years 2026-2030, as set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference;
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 17, Packet Page 386

2. Authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to make any necessary administrative budget transfers, none of which may individually exceed $350,000, between projects with the same funding source during the fiscal period of July 1, 2025 to June 30, 2026; and,

3. Authorizes the Finance Director, or their designee, to reappropriate Capital Improvement Program Closeout Project Budget Savings in the Amount of $11,295,940 to Various Active Capital Improvement Program Projects, as set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 18, Packet Page 387 &ŝǀĞͲzĞĂƌĂƉŝƚĂů/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ

y,//d
Funding Allocations FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 TOTAL 5 year Unfunded (Estimate) Description Project Number Project Name GENERAL FUNDWharf 1 Repairs & Upgrades $200,000 $200,000 $8,432,000 Project will address repairs to Wharf I, to include, but not limited to: decking and asphalt repairs, substructures, pilings.*assessment in progress CIP2501 WHARF 1 REPAIRS & UPGRADES Wharf 2 Repairs $2,150,000 $500,000 $2,650,000 $3,150,000 Project will address repairs to Wharf II, to include, but not limited to: decking and asphalt repairs, substructures, pilings. CIP2415 WHARF II REPAIRSWharf 1 Fire Suppression System Upgrades $1,000,000 $300,000 $1,300,000 $1,500,000 Replacement of the under-wharf sprinkler fire system on Wharf 1. This includes mains and laterals. CIP2502 WHARF 1 FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM UPGRADES City Facilities ADA Upgrades $100,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $850,000 $9,150,000 Implement ADA upgrades based on, but not limited to, 2024 ADA Transition Plan CIP2503 CITY FACILITIES ADA UPGRADES City Parks ADA Upgrades $100,000 $200,000 $150,000 $150,000 $600,000 $10,900,000 Implement ADA upgrades based on, but not limited to, 2024 ADA Transition Plan NEW Fire Station 11/Monterey Police Department Repairs & Upgrades $0 $3,200,000 The scope of projects will be refined as the facility assessment progresses, it includes, but it is not limited to: repair leaking pipes, electrical, HVAC repair, generator installation, exterior painting, and critical repairs as identified. CIP2504
FIRE STATION 11 REPAIRS & UPGRADES
Citywide Pavement Repair $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $3,600,000 $7,600,000 Funding for pavement repairs (Due to sunset of Measure S in 2027), Goal is $5M to $6M per year, supplements Gas Tax and SB1 as well.
951 Del Monte Avenue Groundwater Remediation **See Note** $0 $0 Funding to implement clean up and remediation of groundwater contamination at City-owned property at 951 Del Monte Avenue. 33c1454 951 DEL MONTE AVE- GROUNDWATER REMEDIATIONSidewalk Repair Program $200,000 $200,000 $400,000 Funding for sidewalk and curb ramp repairs that are the City's responsibility (Due to sunset of Measure S in 2027) NEW City Facilities Repairs and Upgrades $300,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,350,000 $10,585,000 Funding to address maintenance and repairs at City Facilities, to include but not limited to: City Offices, Recreation Centers, Police Stations, and Restrooms. Public Works Staff will present a scope for each Fiscal Year. 36c1803

CITY FACILITIES REPAIRS & UPGRADES
Storm Drain Utility Repair Program $350,000 $350,000 $700,000 $500,000 Funding for storm drain repairs (Due to sunset of Measure S in 2027) CIP2312 SD UTILITY-REPAIR & MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Total General Fund: $0 $3,850,000 $2,800,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $11,650,000 $58,217,000 $11,650,000 MONTEREY SPORTS CENTER FACILITY FEESMonterey Sports Center Repairs & Upgrades $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,535,000 The scope of projects includes, but it is not limited to: remodel front desk to be ADA compliant with lower check in station; repair leak in small pool; repair walls in gym closet; replace old and damaged saunas; replace interior lighting with LED Lighting; replace parking lot lights with LED lighting; classroom upgrades; HVAC controls replacement. This project is part of the Housing Element Implementation Plan. CIP2304 MSC REPAIRS & UPGRADES Total MSC Facility Fees: $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,535,000 MONTEREY SPORTS CENTER RESERVE FUNDMonterey Sports Center Boiler Replacements $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 Replace 5 boilers at Monterey Sports Center NEW
Total MSC Reserve Fund: $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $0 GAS TAX (Highway User Tax-HUTA)Gas Tax Right-of-Way Maintenance **See Note** $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 $100,000 Resurface City streets by overlay, slurry, and cape sealing. NEW Foam Street Rehabilitation and Signal Upgrades **See Note** $736,303 $773,429 $1,509,732 Road Rehabilitation of Foam Street (Crack, Seal, HMA Overlay), signalized intersection & ADA upgrades NEW Franklin Street Rehabilitation $770,897 $808,715 $1,579,612 Road Rehabilitation of Franklin Street (Crack, Seal, HMA Overlay) NEW Sign Replacement Program $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 Program to replace regulatory, warning, directional, wayfinding, etc. signs throughout the City CIP2305 SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAMTunnel Maintenance & Repair $863,942 $863,942 Repairs to include, but not limited to: patch pavement, assess lighting and upgrade existing electrical panel, repair or replace exhaust and pump systems and generator CIP2412 TUNNEL MAINTENANCE & REPAIR Total Gas Tax Fund: $863,942 $856,303 $873,429 $890,897 $908,715 $4,393,286 ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHAB (SB1)Cass and El Dorado Street Curb Ramp and Road Rehabilitation $90,779 $90,779 The project site is the Cass Street right of way from Munras Avenue to El Dorado Street and the El Dorado Street right of way from Pacific Street to Munras Avenue. The project entails pavement repair on Cass Street from Munras Avenue to El Dorado Street, culb bulb-outs and retrofitting curb ramps at the intersections of Cass Street and Munras Avenue, Carmelito Avenue, and El Dorado Street, and pavement repair on El Dorado Street from Pacific Street to Munras Avenue. NEW Foam Street Rehabilitation and Signal Upgrades **See Note** $786,762 $802,498 $1,589,260 Road Rehabilitation of Foam Street (Crack, Seal, HMA Overlay), signalized intersection & ADA upgrades NEW Franklin Street Rehabilitation $818,547 $834,918 $1,653,465 Road Rehabilitation of Franklin Street (Crack, Seal, HMA Overlay) NEW Total Road Maintenance and Rehab (SB1) Fund: $90,779 $786,762 $802,498 $818,547 $834,918 $3,333,504 Proposed CIP Plan
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 19, Packet Page 388 &ŝǀĞͲzĞĂƌĂƉŝƚĂů/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ
y,//d
Funding Allocations FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 TOTAL Description Project Number Project Name TIDELAND FUNDProgrammatic Wharf Inspections & Maintenance $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,750,000 Pier pile/timber inspections and maintenance on Wharves 1 & 2. This is ongoing maintenance. NEW Total Tideland Fund: $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,750,000 SEWER FUNDSewer Root Foaming $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $500,000 Sewer root foam approximately 48,000 lineal feet of the 538,560 lineal feet of sewer mains. These mains either have known root intrusion or have access constraints that prohibit routine jetting operations. 33c1501 CW-SEWER-ROOT FOAMING Sewer Repair & Rehab $500,000 $500,000 $350,000 $500,000 $350,000 $2,200,000 This project will provide the ability to respond to unforeseen sewer failures during the course of the budget period and for minor cost overruns and contingencies. 33c1750 CW-SEWER REPAIR & REHAB Sewer Line Video Evaluation $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $1,500,000 Perform video inspection of the City's sanitary sewer infrastructure to assist in programming sewer capital repair projects. 33c1805 SEWER LINE VIDEO EVALUATION
SSMP Update & Audit $150,000 $150,000 $300,000
Regulatory Requirements for Utility - Perform Biennial Program Audit. CIP2309 SSMP BIANNUAL UPDATE Total Sewer Fund: $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $4,500,000 PARKING FUNDParking ADA Upgrades $250,000 $150,000 $200,000 $400,000 $400,000 $1,400,000 Implement ADA upgrades based on Draft 2024 ADA Transition Plan CIP2507 PARKING ADA UPGRADES Parking Lot Maintenance **See Note** $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $600,000 Provide maintenance at City owned Parking Lots NEWParking Garage Maintenance **See Note** $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000 $600,000 Project will address deferred maintenance at the City parking Garages (Downtown, Cannery Row and Calle Principal). NEW
Calle Principal Garage Repairs & Upgrades $275,000 $250,000 $525,000 Implement repairs & upgrades identified in the Parking Garage Facility Assessment (2024). NEW Cannery Row Garage Repairs & Upgrades $275,000 $700,000 $975,000 Implement repairs & upgrades identified in the Parking Garage Facility Assessment (2024). NEWDowntown East Garage Repairs & Upgrades $275,000 $275,000 Implement repairs & upgrades identified in the Parking Garage Facility Assessment (2024). NEWDowntown West Garage Repairs & Upgrades $275,000 $275,000 Implement repairs & upgrades identified in the Parking Garage Facility Assessment (2024). NEWParking Office Repairs & Upgrades $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 $200,000 NEWReplace Parking Garage Lighting $850,000 $850,000 Replace lighting in Downtown and Cannery Row garages CIP2317 REPLACE PARKING GARAGE LIGHTING Cannery Row Surface Lot Repairs $500,000 $500,000 Pavement repair and restriping of Cannery Row surface lot. Storm water control measures to comply with the General Storm Water Permit. NEW Downtown Surface Lots Repairs $1,000,000 $1,000,000 Pavement repair and restriping of downtown surface lots. NEW El Estero Park Center Parking Lot Repairs **See Note** $0 Pavement repair and restriping of El Estero Parking Lot. NEWLibrary Parking Lot Repairs $200,000 $200,000 Pavement repair and restriping of surface lot. Storm water control measures to comply with the General Storm Water Permit. NEW Total Parking Fund: $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $1,000,000 $7,400,000 MEASURE SMeasure S - Storm Drains $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Citywide storm drain repair. 33c1554 MEASURE S-STORM DRAINSMeasure S - Sidewalks $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,800,000 Sidewalk repairs in the downtown and commercial areas. 35c1552 MEASURE S-SIDEWALKSMeasure S - Pavement $6,639,481 $5,327,525 $960,567 $12,927,573 Citywide pavement repair. 35c1553 MEASURE S-PAVEMENTMeasure S - ADA $7,314,300 $2,573,224 $9,887,524 Citywide ADA upgrades to include signalized intersections, curb ramps 35c1555 MEASURE S-ADA Total Measure S Fund: $15,753,781 $9,900,749 $960,567 $0 $0 $26,615,097 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 20, Packet Page 389 &ŝǀĞͲzĞĂƌĂƉŝƚĂů/ŵƉƌŽǀĞŵĞŶƚWůĂŶ
y,//d
Funding Allocations FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 TOTAL Description Project Number Project Name MEASURE XLake El Estero Multi-Use Path $800,000 $700,000 $1,500,000 This project proposes a Class I multi-use path around the perimeter of Lake El Estero. The scope includes closing sidewalk gaps with new AC sections, and upgrading existing dirt paths to have a continuous class I facility around the lake. The scope will also include pedestrian crossing improvements at Del Monte Ave between the Rec Trail and the new multi-use path. This project is part of the Housing Element Implementation Plan. CIP2509 LAKE EL ESTERO MULT-USE PATH E Franklin St Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements $700,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $2,500,000 E Franklin St Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements - This project proposes bicycle and pedestrian improvements between the Monterey Sports Center and the Rec Trail. The project proposes reconfiguring E Franklin St between Washington St and Camino El Estero with a wider multi-use sidewalk and a single eastbound lane. The project will increase parking supply on Franklin by converting parallel parking to angle parking. The reduction in lanes also allows for the signal at Figuroa St to be converted into a two-way stop. The project will also make necessary ADA upgrades along the corridor and rehab the concrete pavement on E Franklin St. This project is part of the Housing Element Implementation Plan. CIP2510 E FRANKLIN ST. BIKE & PED IMPROVEMENTS
Multi-Modal Plan Implementation $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $400,000 A bicycle and pedestrian connection improvement on Garden Road between Olmsted and Fairground. Several Potential Alternatives including, Class I or Class IV Bicycle facilities. Class III Bicycle Boulevard on Casanova Avenue, Airport Road, English Avenue, Casa Verde Way, Montecito Ave. CIP2511

MULTI-MODAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
Del Monte/Washington Intersection Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project $391,547 $595,911 $633,866 $372,240 $1,993,564 Bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements at the intersection of Del Monte Avenue and Washington St. CIP2320 DEL MONTE/WASHINGTON BICYCLE PED IMPRCalle Principal Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Project $200,000 $200,000 Bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements on Calle Principal between Del Monte Ave and Hartnell St NEW Total Measure X Fund: $1,491,547 $1,395,911 $1,433,866 $1,272,240 $1,100,000 $6,693,564 CIP Total: $21,900,049 $19,639,725 $9,720,360 $8,331,684 $7,593,633 $66,985,451 ** Receiving funding via re-appropriation of CIP Funds.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 21, Packet Page 390 W/d>WZK:
dh'
ddZE^&
Z>/^d
y,//d
Project Account
Code Project Name Project Account Code Project Name
CIP2408 Police Satellite Offic Exterior Paint $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 33c1454 951 Del Monte Avenue Groundwater Remediation CIP2404 Police Department HVAC Repair $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 CIP2504 Fire Station 11/Monterey Police Department Repairs & Upgrades Total General Fund: 300,000.00 $ $ 300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 Project Account
Code Project Name Project Account Code Project Name
CIP2506 Roberts Ave Slope Stabilization $ 728,358 $ 728,358 $ 728,358 $ 765,803 $ 3,000,000 NEW Foam Street Rehabilitation & Signal Upgrades Total Road Maintenance & Rehab (SB1) Fund: 4,662,440 $ $ 4,494,161 $ 4,494,161 Project Account
Code Project Name Project Account Code Project Name
$ 600,000 CIP2412 Tunnel Maintenance & Repair $ 1,600,000 NEW Foam Street Rehabilitation & Signal Upgrades $ 202,565 34c1215 Upgrade City Pavement Management Program $ 158,400 $ 40,142 $ 40,142 Total Gas Tax Fund: 6,303,423 $ $ 2,442,707 $ 2,442,707 Balance Transfer
Transfer to Project:

CIP2307 Pavement Reconstruction/Resurfacing Program - SB1 $ 3,934,082 $ 3,765,803 NEW Cass & El Dorado Street Curb Ramp/Road RehabilitationNEW Gas Tax Right-of-Way Maintenance 30c1308 Pavement Reconstruction/Resurfacing Program $ 6,145,023 $ 2,402,565

GAS TAX (HUTA) FUND
Transfer from Project:

Budget

GENERAL FUND
Budget Balance Transfer
Transfer from Project: Transfer to Project:

ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHAB (SB1) FUND
Transfer from Project:

Budget Balance Transfer
Transfer to Project:
1 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 22, Packet Page 391 W/d>WZK:
dh'
ddZE^&
Z>/^d
y,//d
Project Account
Code Project Name Project Account Code Project Name
CIP2001 Programmatic Wharf Repairs $ 2,375,000 $ 678,627 $ 678,627 NEW Programmatic Wharf Inspections & Maintenance 63c1754 Coast Guard Pier Reuse Project $ 170,000 $ 6,525 $ 6,525 30c1950 Fire Storage Building Repair $ 55,000 $ 51,340 $ 51,340 CIP2411 Wharf 2 Warehouse Transformer $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 CIP2502 Wharf 1 Fire Supression System Upgrades 64c1807 Wharf 2 Warehouse Exterior Rehab $ 462,493 $ 398,335 $ 200,000 CIP2415 Wharf II Repairs Total Tidelands Fund: 3,162,493 $ $ 1,234,827 $ 1,036,492 Project Account
Code Project Name Project Account Code Project Name
64c1604 Wharf 2 Mid-Wharf Restroom $ 695,000 $ 627,908 $ 627,908 63c1902 Harbormaster ADA Upgrades $ 429,922 $ 429,758 $ 429,758 Total Gas Tax Fund: 1,124,922 $ $ 1,057,665 $ 1,057,665 Wharf II Repairs

TIDELANDS FUND
Transfer from Project:

Budget
CIP2415
Balance Transfer
Transfer to Project:

MARINA FUND
Transfer from Project:

Budget Balance Transfer
Transfer to Project:

CIP2501 Wharf 1 Repairs & Upgrades
2 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 23, Packet Page 392 W/d>WZK:
dh'
ddZE^&
Z>/^d
y,//d
Project Account
Code Project Name Project Account Code Project Name
$ 378,500 NEW Parking Lot Maintenance $ 250,000 NEW El Estero Park Center Parking Lot Repairs $ 575,086 NEW Library Parking Lot Repairs $ 100,000 NEW Parking Garage Maintenance $ 220,442 NEW Downtown East Garage Repairs & Upgrades $ 220,443 NEW Downtown West Garage Repairs & Upgrades $ 220,443 NEW Cannery Row Garage Repairs & Upgrades Total Parking Fund: $ 4,445,406 $ 1,964,914 $ 1,964,914 Grand Total: 19,998,683 $ $ 11,494,274 $ 11,295,940
65c1809 Parking Garage Repair $ 2,525,000 $ 761,328
Transfer from Project:

Budget Balance Transfer
Transfer to Project:

PARKING FUND
65c1427 CW-Parking Lot Maintenance & Repair $ 1,920,406 $ 1,203,586 3 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 24, Packet Page 393

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM

FIVE YEAR CIP
FISCAL YEARS 25/26 TO 29/30
ATTACHMENT 4
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 25, Packet Page 394 This five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the community’s vision for short- and long-range development, maintenance, improvement and building of new infrastructure assets to benefit our residents, businesses, property owners and visitors. It provides a linkage between the General Plan, various master planning documents and budget, and provides a means for planning, scheduling and implementing capital projects over the next five years.

The CIP provides a long-term approach for prioritizing and selecting new projects in the City. The program document is updated annually to reflect changing community needs, priorities, and funding opportunities to ensure that the infrastructure exists to advance the community’s strategic and longterm goals and objectives. The CIP is intended to incorporate the City’s investments in infrastructure development and maintenance (i.e., capital improvements) with other significant capital expenditures that add to or strategically invest in the City’s inventory of assets.

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT

PROGRAM
Five Year CIP FY 25/26 to FY 29/30
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 26, Packet Page 395 1

CITY INFRASTRUCTURE

OVERVIEW
2 2 Wharves 108 Centerline Miles
Marina
414 Berths
114 Moorings
40 Seasonal
Parking
4 Structures
1,955 stalls
3129 Street
Lights
56 Signalized
Intersections 30 Surface Lots 5.8 miles of Rec Trail
Sewer
100 miles
7 Lift Stations
2300 structures
Stormwater
44 miles
2 Lift Stations
2800 structures
97 City Facilities
396,000 sq. ft.
18 miles of Bike Facilities
36 Parks and
Open Spaces
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 27, Packet Page 396

ALIGNMENT WITH VALUE

DRIVERS

COUNCIL

MISSION
"In partnership with our entire
community, the Monterey City Council
provides visionary leadership ensuring
a safe, healthy, historic, economically
vibrant, and sustainable environment."

CASCADING
GOALS
Vision is a description of Monterey’s “desired future”; Mission identifies the role of the City of Monterey in pursuing the City’s Vision; Value Drivers identifies what is important to the community to support the City’s Mission;
Strategic Priorities describes how the City can advance its goals in support of the Value Drivers; and the
City Staff Work Program is a set of specific program, policy, or projects that support the City’s Strategic Priorities.

COUNCIL
VISION
"Monterey: A beautiful, special place to
live, work, and visit. Anda!"
3 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 28, Packet Page 397

DEFINITION OF

CAPITAL PROJECTS
A capital project is defined as a long-term investment project requiring relatively large sums to acquire, design, plan, develop, improve, and/or maintain City infrastructure. Under this definition, a capital project could include land acquisition, construction, reconstruction, renovation, demolition, equipment, and studies necessary to plan for development of the community.

A capital project should possess the following characteristics:

It has a long, useful life or significantly extends the useful life of an existing fixed asset.

It is comparatively expensive and is not of routine nature.

It serves an essential public purpose.

It is fixed in place or stationary.

It is related to government functions and expenditures.

It is a usual responsibility of a local government.

Costs for ordinary repair and routine maintenance work necessary to keep a facility or asset in useful condition for its function and occupants are included in the operating budget and not the capital budget.

Generally, a capital project is fixed in nature, has a relatively long life expectancy, and requires a substantial financial investment. Capital projects traditionally take the form of large-scale physical developments, such as buildings, streets, and utility infrastructure. A capital project must cost a minimum of $50,000, and generally include one or more of the following characteristics:

Major replacement of facilities such as roofs, heating, plumbing, and electrical systems.

Preliminary studies and surveys pursuant to construction or rehabilitation of City-owned property.

Improvements to City-owned utilities such as sewers, streets, and storm drains.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 29, Packet Page 398 4

CIP PROGRAM

DEVELOPMENT
Many City Departments are ‘asset owners’ of buildings, parks and other facilities covered by the CIP, and are integral partners in the CIP prioritization process.

Department representatives submit project requests to the Public Works Department that reflect their priorities and goals for capital improvements, which are then reviewed for prioritization.

After the project proposals have been submitted, the CIP committee evaluates and prioritizes each project, without regard to the funds available. (See Page 5) Then, Finance staff will forecast the amount of funds available. Projects competing for general funds are re-prioritized based upon the available funds.

Criteria used for project ranking include: critical needs; operating efficiency; legal mandates; alignment with Council priorities; managing department resources; project schedule; funding source alignment; and impact to operating budget. The CIP selection process is continuously being updated based on best practices, with additional objective selection criteria and priority ranking being considered every year. Staff will continue to study operational demands on aging facilities and infrastructure, consider public health and safety, and ensure reliability and compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, and building, fire, and safety codes.

Unspent funds from previous Capital Budgets are reviewed annually to determine whether a former project has been temporarily delayed, altered, or is no longer feasible. Based on this analysis, funds might be transferred to current fiscal year projects.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 30, Packet Page 399 5

CIP PROJECT

PRIORITIZATION

HEALTH & SAFETY
Creates a safer and healthier
community for everyone in the
City of Monterey.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Addresses issues with City
facilities and reduces future
repair costs.

ECONOMY
Addresses impacts to quality
of life for residents, visitors and
workforce.

ENVIRONMENT
Prepares for climate change
and improves air and water
quality.

REQUIRED WORK
Addresses the City’s policies
and regulations, as well as
Federal and State mandates.

IMPROVEMENT
Builds or provides upgrades to
City infrastructure and
facilities (streets, sidewalks,
recreation centers, etc.)

COLLABORATION
Driven by communities and/or
involves community groups or
other agencies.

PROJECT READINESS
Work has been planned and/or
already started.

EQUITY is also considered by identifying projects that address disparities within the Health/Safety, Existing Conditions, Economy, Environment, Improvement and Collaboration factors. These subfactors vary within Capital Assets as appropriate.

Staff performs the initial evaluation and ranking of proposed projects. Projects are generally prioritized in accordance with evaluation criteria including:
6 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 31, Packet Page 400 Facilities Parking Harbor Utilities Right of
Way
Parks Info.

Tech.

City Owned
Buildings
Parking
Infrastructure
Conference
Center
Police Station
Fire Stations
Rec Centers
City Offices
Library
Municipal
Wharves &
Marina
Sanitary Sewer
System & Storm
Drains
Roads,
Sidewalks,
Traffic Systems
Parking
Garages
Surface Lots
Metered
Parking
City Facility
Lots
Parking
Enforcement
Wharf
Infrastructure
Marina
Infrastructure
Parks,
Greenbelts,
Beaches
Storm Drain
Repair
Sanitary
Sewer System
Repair
Sewer Line
Maintenance
Environmental
Regulations
Pavement
Maintenance
and Repairs
Sidewalk
Repairs
ADA and
Signal
Upgrades
Traffic
Systems
Greenbelt
Fuel
Reduction
Rec Trail
Improvements
Park Upgrades
Asset
Management
and Work
Order
Software
Traffic Video
Surveillance
Software &
Related
Hardware
Except for the General Fund, funding sources have restrictions for the types of infrastructure rehabilitation that can be completed. Projects fall within 7 primary categories: Facilities, Parking, Harbor, Utilities, Right of Way, Parks, and Information Technology.

PROJECT CATEGORIES
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 32, Packet Page 401 7

FUNDING SOURCES
General Fund Parking Fund Measure X SB1 Gas Tax
Tidelands Fund Measure S Sewer Fund Stormwater Fund
Marina Fund MSC Facility Fees MSC Reserve Funds
FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 FY30
0 5
10 15
20 25
The five-year CIP coordinates physical improvements with financial planning, allowing maximum benefits from available funding sources. Providing a fiveyear funding plan allows staff to identify, prioritize, and optimize the financing of capital projects.

In Millions of Dollars
8 ***Sewer, Stormwater, and Marina Funds unavailable for appropriation FY 25-29*** Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 33, Packet Page 402

SAMPLE CIP PROJECT PAGE

1. Title of Project: Title of project on official
documents

2. Category: Describes the project type

3. Project Number: Funding account number

4. Funding: Current level of funding (Funded,
Partially Funded, On-Going)

5. Location: Specific location of project, Citywide
initiative, or neighborhood

6. Status: Describes progress of the project
(Existing/New, Active/On-hold/Complete)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 11
10 12

7. CEQA: Applicability of CA Environmental Quality
Act

8. Project Description: Provides information
regarding scope of project

9. Estimate: Total cost of project

10. Estimated O&M: Operating impacts associated
with project completion

11. Funding Sources: Appropriation schedule, by
year for the project, including previous funding

12. Value Drivers: Alignment with Council Value
Drivers and Strategic Priorities
9 Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 34, Packet Page 403

THANK YOU
CONTACT US :
831-646-3920
www.monterey.gov
[email protected]
580 Pacific St. Monterey, CA 93940
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 14., Item Page 35, Packet Page 404 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Andrea Renny, P.E., PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared by: Reginald Paulding, P.E., Senior Engineer
SUBJECT: Provide Guidance Concerning 2025/26 Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Objectives and Priorities ***NCIP*** (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council provide guidance to the
Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program
(NCIP) Committee regarding submissions and
prioritizing projects that address public health, safety, and essential facilities.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing;
and maintaining a safe environment.

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements,
visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and
community partnerships.

Expand opportunities for people of all ages and
abilities to bike and walk safely through active
transportation, accessibility, and safety initiatives.

Foster a local government that is transparent and
collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates
input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with past Council practice to provide guidance to the NCIP Committee prior to project submissions.

Agenda Report Highlights
 City Council guidance is essential
for prioritizing NCIP projects that
address public health, safety, and
essential facilities.
 NCIP funding, sourced from
Transient Occupancy Tax, is critical
for infrastructure repairs due to the
lack of General Fund allocations.
 Staff shortages in the Engineering
Division are delaying project
delivery despite efforts to hire and
contract consultants.
 Deferred maintenance needs total
$341 million over 30 years,
highlighting a significant funding gap
for infrastructure.
 Recommended priority projects for
FY26 include Wharf II repairs, ADA
upgrades, restroom remodels, and
park facility improvements.

Date: 6/3/2025
Item No.: 15.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 15., Item Page 1, Packet Page 405 №10/24
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no direct fiscal implications associated with providing guidance to the NCIP Committee.

City Council approved 30 new NCIP projects in 2024 with an estimated value of $10.56 million. As of May 5, 2025, there are 77 active NCIP projects with a budget of approximately $18.8 million. There is an additional $592,642 in contingency funding. The unappropriated and available fund balance is currently approximately $5.5 million and the Projected Revenues are approximately $6 million. The total amount of funding projected in the NCIP account in FY26 is approximately $25.8 million.

NCIP Active Project Balance (Previous Years) $18,800,000 NCIP Projected FY26 Revenues $6,000,000
Less FY26 Admin Expense ($400,000)
NCIP Projected FY26 Unappropriated Fund Balance $1,400,000 NCIP Projected Total Balance $25,800,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to provide guidance to the NCIP Committee to prioritize projects that address public health, safety, and essential facilities; however, this is not recommended because the City has significant unfunded critical infrastructure needs with limited funding sources available. Utilizing other City funds would result in a reduction of other services or programs, which is not recommended. The projects described in this agenda report are in dire need of repair, and if these critical needs are not addressed, an option would be to close the facilities and the services provided at these locations.

DISCUSSION:

As in previous years, City Council provides guidance to the NCIP committee on program objectives and priorities at the beginning of the NCIP Year, prior to project submissions. NCIP project nominations are due on July 31, 2025 for consideration during the FY 2025/26 cycle.

The NCIP is projected to receive approximately $6 million in funding in FY 2025. After Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 15., Item Page 2, Packet Page 406 №10/24
reconciliation of accounts, the NCIP was allocated approximately $10.3 million in funding in FY 2024 including approximately $4.8 million in one-time funding. The NCIP is funded through the allocation of 16 percent of the money collected through Transient Occupancy Tax (hotel tax).

NCIP Program: Funding New Projects or Existing Infrastructure? The purpose of the NCIP since its inception has been to direct tourist-generated dollars directly back into the City’s residential neighborhoods and to provide for capital projects of communitywide benefit. (Charter section 6.6.) The City Council funds projects that are ranked and recommended by the NCIP Committee.

Over the past 20 years, annual funding for the NCIP Program has grown from $2 million in 2004 to a projected $6 million in FY 2026. Average annual funding for the NCIP program has stabilized around $6 million since the TOT increase of two percentage points, from 10% to 12%, went into effect in January 2021. Approximately $500,000 in allocations each year are made from interest earned and not TOT revenue. NCIP dollars are generated from the City’s Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) collections at a rate of 16 percent.

The City is facing a budget deficit and has made the difficult decision to not fund any infrastructure needs out of unrestricted General Funds in FY26. This highlights the increased importance of funding critical infrastructure projects through the NCIP this year.

Absent closing down existing City facilities because of a lack of funding to maintain them or cutting core services (neither of which staff recommends, and would be a disservice to the community), the City must continue to look at partnering with the NCIP Committee to utilize this important source of City funds towards the repair of existing aging infrastructure in our community. The amount of NCIP funding far exceeds General Fund Capital Improvement Program (CIP) funding, which is zero dollars this fiscal year due to operating costs, pension liabilities, insurance, debt payment, and other essential expenses. There are not enough General Fund dollars to support City operations and the City’s aging infrastructure. The cost of funding City services such as staffing (including police officers, firefighters, park workers, and other personnel) along with operational expenses like insurance, supplies, and materials, has risen significantly in recent years.

The City Council, the City Council-appointed NCIP Committee Members, and City staff have a long history of collaboration in supporting Citywide projects and City facilities which benefit the community. In FY25, the NCIP recommended funding for five projects of great benefit to the City and neighborhoods: Forest Management & Fuel Reduction at an amount of $1M, Hilltop Park Center at $1 million, and Fire Stations 12 and 13 Rehabilitation at an amount of $2.25 million.

These examples show how well Council, NCIP Committee Members, and City staff understand that NCIP funds support a variety of projects in our community.

As a result of this prior Council guidance, the NCIP Committee has been aware of the Council’s fiscal responsibilities, priorities, and value drivers. As such, NCIP-recommended projects were more heavily weighted towards projects that addressed the City Council’s priorities of public health, public safety, and essential functions. The project application deadline for the 2025/26 NCIP Year is July 31, 2025, and the recommended NCIP budget and projects are anticipated to be brought to the City Council in April 2026. The City Council will consider the Committee’s recommendations and establish a budget for each approved project.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 15., Item Page 3, Packet Page 407 №10/24
Current Status of the NCIP Program
City Council approved 31 new NCIP projects in FY 2023, 44 new NCIP projects in FY 2024, and 30 new NCIP projects in FY 2025, for a total of 105 projects over the last three years. City staff completed 15 projects in Calendar Year (CY) 2023, 18 projects in CY 2024, and three (3) projects to date in CY 2025 for a total of 36 projects. As of May 2025, there are 77 active NCIP projects with a budget of approximately $18.8 million. There is an additional $592,642 in contingency funding. Currently, the unappropriated and available fund balance is approximately $5.5 million.

The number and variety of approved NCIP projects have stretched staff’s ability to deliver the projects in a timely manner. Unfortunately, this is not a new issue, but is exacerbated by the significant staff shortage, particularly in the Engineering Division. NCIP projects require careful planning, permitting, project management, and expertise across multiple City departments.

Currently, one full-time equivalent staff engineer is dedicated to the design and implementation of NCIP projects. In order to implement the program successfully and deliver projects timely, approximately six (6) to seven (7) full time employees would be required to be assigned to the NCIP program.

The City is making efforts to hire additional engineers and project managers and has increased compensation, offering retaining incentives, and utilizing creative recruitment methods; however, there are challenges with the current market and fierce competition for engineers throughout the region. The Engineering Division has operated with 50% vacancy rate or higher in the past two years. These are the positions responsible for design, project management, and construction management. In the past six months, the Division has gained an Assistant Engineer but also lost a Senior Engineer. The City currently has only four licensed engineers and 15 years ago, there were over 10 licensed engineers. These vacancies continue to severely impact the Division’s ability to deliver NCIP projects since in the past the program also relied on other staff engineers. The City is also augmenting its capacity by contracting with consultants; however, consultants are also facing the same staff shortages and increased lead time for delivery of projects.

Historically, the City Council has provided guidance to the NCIP committee on projects it would like to see considered in the upcoming funding cycle. For example, Council could indicate it would like to see NCIP prioritize projects that make improvements to public safety, parks and recreation, and infrastructure projects.

Project Impacts to Ongoing Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Certain NCIP-recommended projects have ongoing O&M costs. NCIP projects bring great value to the community; however, after the initial NCIP funding for construction, any O&Mrelated costs are funded out of the General Fund. While NCIP committee will support extensive repairs, funding ongoing maintenance out of NCIP funding is not allowed. This exacerbates the City’s infrastructure funding conundrum: limited funds are available outside of NCIP for necessary facility rehabilitation, and select new NCIP projects that need ongoing maintenance also rely on the limited non-NCIP funds. As beneficial as these projects are to the community, these ongoing O&M expenses should be taken into consideration in the current funding shortage. These projects may increase the City’s long-term financial obligations and limiting the City’s ability to plan and budget for the City’s capital needs over time.

Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 15., Item Page 4, Packet Page 408 №10/24
Summary of Funding Needs and Challenges
To provide additional perspective to the discussion on the needs the City is facing, staff has recently completed a needs assessment of our critical infrastructure as well as City-owned facilities. On May 6, 2025, City staff presented on the City’s infrastructure funding needs to the City Council. Based on current estimates there are approximately $106 million in deferred maintenance needs within the next five years and approximately $235 million from years six to year 30, for a total of approximately $341 million. There is a substantial gap between projected infrastructure needs and funding. Every city and county is facing rising expenses for the operation, maintenance, and rehabilitation of infrastructure. Insufficient investment over the years has led to a growing backlog of projects, hindering the overall functionality and safety of essential infrastructure.

Despite the daunting nature of this funding gap, City staff are striving for transparency and emphasizing that the challenge should not be deferred to future generations of councilmembers and staff. This approach reflects a sense of responsibility toward ensuring the sustainability and resilience of the City's infrastructure, recognizing that delayed action could exacerbate the existing issues and lead to more significant challenges in the future. Neglected infrastructure does not only result in additional maintenance costs over time, but it also has a serious impact on the ability of the City to recruit and retain talented employees who do not want to work in dilapidated facilities or community members who do not want to participate in programs held in poorly maintained facilities.

Currently, the City of Monterey lacks the necessary funding within its current tax and revenue framework to adequately maintain its infrastructure assets. The repercussions of this infrastructure deficit are far-reaching, affecting public safety, community services, and the overall quality of life for our community. The City continues to invest in programs and services by funding staff who deliver these services. However, staff and the community rely on buildings that are adequately maintained in order to deliver services effectively.

Currently, there is no available funding from the General Fund for CIP projects in FY 2025-26, and even in FY 2024-25, only $2.5 million was allocated, a fraction of what is needed. Recent Facility Condition Assessments revealed nearly $26 million in critical maintenance needs over the next five years alone, from roof repairs to HVAC and electrical updates. Monterey's right-ofway infrastructure, including streets, sidewalks, traffic signals, and curb ramps, requires over $49 million in investments in the next five years to maintain safe and accessible public spaces.

Measure P and S have been critical to the repairs of our streets, storm drains and installation of curb ramps. However, these funds can only be used to address specific projects and the measure sunsets in 2027. It is clear we have a significant challenge to adequately fund our infrastructure, including City-owned buildings. Meanwhile, both Wharf I and Wharf II have been rated in poor condition, requiring urgent repairs totaling over $18 million.

Projects for Consideration
The following Projects are recommended for priority consideration:
 Wharf II Repairs
 Citywide Public Restroom Repairs and Upgrades
 Replace Failing Sections of Recreation Trail Retaining Wall along Lighthouse Curve  Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Improvements at Facilities and Parks  Utility Undergrounding Funds for Rule 20A Project (North Fremont)  205 Montecito Ave Tenant Improvements (Community Space) Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 15., Item Page 5, Packet Page 409 №10/24
 El Estero Park Center Facility Improvements
 Scholze Park Center Facility Improvements
NCIP FY26 Projected Available Funding $7,400,000
Wharf II Repairs $1,650,000
Citywide Public Restroom Remodels $800,000
Replace Failing Sections of Rec Trail
Retaining Wall
$250,000
ADA Upgrades – Facilities and Parks $300,000
Rule 20A Utility Undergrounding $1,000,000
205 Montecito Ave Tenant Improvements $600,000
El Estero Park Center Facility Improvements $1,000,000
Scholze Park Center Facility Improvements $250,000
Total $5,850,000 $5,850,000
Available
Unappropriated
Balance
$1,550,000
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that Council makes the above projects a priority for NCIP funding.

Additionally, Staff recommends that the City Council advise the NCIP Committee to continue to focus on projects that address public health and public safety, and that special attention be paid to City facilities since this component of the City’s infrastructure is critically underfunded.

Staff looks forward to Council’s discussion and recommendations. c: NCIP Representatives
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 6/3/2025, Item No. 15., Item Page 6, Packet Page 410

← All documents from this meeting