Monterey City Council
August 19, 2025

Council Chamber
580 Pacific St.

Monterey, California

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Regular Meeting and
Closed Session, and Joint
Meeting with the NCIP
Committee
Tuesday, August 19, 2025
4:00 PM
Mayor
Tyller Williamson
Councilmembers
Kim Barber, District 1
Ed Smith, District 2
Jean Rasch, District 3
Gino Garcia, District 4
City Manager
Hans Uslar
City Attorney
M. Christine Davi
HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING:
 In-Person: At the meeting location listed above.
 Remotely via ZoomGov webinar:
o On a computer or smartphone: https://monterey-org.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 Zoom software must be up-to-date. For help, please use our Zoom Meeting Instructions. o By telephone dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (CA) or 646-828-7666 (NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another. Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 # If asked for participant ID, press #. To raise your hand (or lower it), dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute.
 This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (~10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay).  Written comment: Emailed comments to [email protected] sent no later than ½ hour before the start of the meeting (sooner preferred) are not read aloud but are made available to the Council and public at monterey.gov/submitted-comments.

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS:

The total amount of time allocated for public comment on a particular issue and for each individual speaker is generally as follows:

1. Up to three minutes per speaker.

2. For regular City Council meetings, there are two 15-minute public comment periods, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. Speakers may only comment during one session.

3. The total time allocated for public comment:
a. 30 minutes per item – Public Appearance and Public Hearing items b. 15 minutes per item – All other items (including, but not limited to, Consent, Closed Session, Presentations, and Requests to Agendize)
At the time an item is considered, the Mayor will ask those attending the meeting in person to line up at the podium or raise their hands, and for remote participants to use *9 on the telephone or the “raise hand” function in Zoom, if they wish to address the City Council. The maximum amount of time for each person to speak and the total amount of time allotted for each item will be determined based on the number of people indicating an interest in speaking and the amount of business to be conducted on the agenda. In exceptional circumstances and when necessary to ensure a full opportunity for public input, the Mayor may, with the legislative body’s consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt. Code §84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.

August 19, 2025 4:00 PM
2 AFTERNOON SESSION (4:00 p.m.)
Call to Order
General Public Comments
The public may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Consent Agenda
All matters listed under Consent Agenda are routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

Consent: Approval of Minutes

1. August 5, 2025 Regular Meeting (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Consent: Award of Construction Contracts

2. Award a Construction Contract in the Amount of $710,465.06 to Stanley Semmel, an Individual Doing Business as Solex and Applied Solar Energy for POM-B617 Install Solar and Battery Sys (POM 23-035) at Presidio of Monterey ***IGSA*** (Categorically Excluded from NEPA 32 CFR, Part 651, Section II(g)(1); CEQA Not a Project) Consent: Ordinances
An ordinance is a law adopted by the City Council and codified in the City Code. Through the adoption of an ordinance, the City may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other laws not in conflict with state or federal law. An ordinance generally becomes effective 30 days after approval at a second reading.

3. Approve 2nd Reading of Ordinances Amending Chapter 33 and Chapter 38 of the Monterey City Code to Implement the Provisions of California Senate Bill 9 and Housing Element Program I-J Allowing for Ministerial Approval of Qualifying Residential Developments and Lot Splits (Not a Project under Division 13, Commencing with Section 21000, of the Public Resources Code) Consent: Resolutions
A resolution is an expression of opinion or evidence of a decision made by the City Council and often relates to administrative business of the City. Resolutions generally become effective immediately upon adoption.

4. Approve Participation in the Nationwide Opioid Litigation Settlements with Purdue Pharma L.P., the Sackler Family, Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, and Zydus and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Participation and Subdivision Agreements, and Request Direct Payments to the City (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

5. Approve the Purchase of One Sewer Jet Truck from Vac-Con, Inc. in the Amount of $492,401.34 (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

6. City Council Adopt the Historic Preservation Commission Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Mills Act Contract August 19, 2025 4:00 PM
3 Maintenance Schedule for the Property at 1078 W. Franklin Street (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31)

7. Amend and Restate Resolution 25-058, the FY 25/26 Position Control List, to Delete a Deputy City Attorney Classification and Add a New Deputy City Attorney I/II Classification and Amend and Restate Resolution 25-059, the FY 25/26 Salary Schedule, to Establish the Salary (Not a Project Under CEQA, Per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
End of Consent Agenda
Afternoon Session Items
Public Hearing (Afternoon)
Public Hearings are held to receive a staff presentation and public comment on certain items prior to City Council action. NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS: If you challenge the City Council’s zoning, planning, or land use decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing on the matter, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at the time of or prior to the public hearing. (Government Code section 65009.)

8. Adopt the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Recommendations to Approve 1st Reading of an Ordinance to Rezone 817 Martin Street from R-1-15 to R-1-15-H-2 as a City Historic Resource and Authorize a Mills Act Contract (Property Tax Savings Program for Historic Structures) (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5)
Public Appearance (Afternoon)
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

9. Appoint Councilmembers as Representative and Alternate to Serve on the Access Media Productions (AMP) Board of Directors (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Council Comments
Councilmembers may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their activities. In addition, Councilmember or the City Council may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information. (Government Code section 54954.2(a)(3).)
City Manager Reports
The City Manager may make a brief report on their activities or a brief announcement. They may also ask for clarification or direction regarding scheduling of Council meetings and study sessions.

Adjourn to Closed Session
The City Council will take public comments on closed session items before convening to closed session.

Closed Session (Afternoon)
Part or all of a meeting may be closed to the public under special conditions. Council can consider only matters covered in the agenda descriptions.

10. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1):

1. City of Monterey v. Marianne McNicol (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV001205)
August 19, 2025 4:00 PM
4 2. City of Monterey v. Leslie J. Flores, Trustee (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 24CV000750)

3. Ashley Ellcessor v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 24CV000649)

4. Francisca Moralez v. City of Monterey et al. (United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 22-CV-07540)

5. Richard Rosendale v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000879)

6. Ronald Rogers v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV003206)

7. Tammy Ryan v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 25CV002541)

8. Pacific Western Bank v. City and Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2212212; Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No.

E082907)

9. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. v. City of Monterey (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 18CV329015)

10. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. v City of Monterey (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. CVR12103427)

11. Save Tarpy Flats v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 24 CV005125)
(Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Recess
Reconvene
EVENING SESSION AGENDA (Approximately 7 p.m.)
Pledge of Allegiance
Announcements from Closed Session
Adjourn to Joint Meeting of the City Council and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Committee, and Establish Quorum of the NCIP Committee
NCIP Committee Members:

Aguajito Oaks: A.J. Purdy (Alt: Dean Bobrowski)
Alta Mesa: Amy Stocker (Alt: Holly Ochoa)
Casanova Oak Knoll: Shelly Schmidt (Alt: Chelsea Lenowska) Deer Flats: Scott Cohick (Alt: Dave Overton)
Del Monte Beach: Jayme Fields (Alt: Vacant)
Del Monte Grove-Laguna Grande: Scott Hanson (Alt: Joseph Hill) Downtown: William Curtis Tipton (Alt: Bella Lofaso)
Fisherman Flats: Gary Baker (Alt: Vacant)
Glenwood: Lee Whitney (Alt: Amanda Preece)
Monterey Vista: Hans Jannasch (Alt: Gina Sessions)
New Monterey: Chinyere Ogbonna, Chair of NCIP Committee (Alt: Natalia Tjandra) Oak Grove: Luz Adam (Alt: Vacant)
Old Town: Susan Ricketson (Alt: Rosemary Robert)
Skyline: Dennis Duke (Alt: Vacant)
Villa Del Monte: Jil Johnson (Alt: Tammy Jennings)
August 19, 2025 4:00 PM
5 Public Appearance (Evening)
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

11. Joint Meeting of the City Council and Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) to Discuss Project Priorities and Process (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Adjournment
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.gov/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours. All comments and materials provided to the Council become part of the public record. Members of the public who comment in any fashion on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $500 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months.

INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings.

Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance.

Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including disabled people in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact [email protected] or (831) 646-3935.

Notification 30+ hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-to-speech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. If you require a hearing amplification device to attend a meeting, dial 711 to use CRS to talk to the City Clerk's Office at (831) 646-3935 to coordinate use of a device.

CITY OF MONTEREY 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES: (831) 646-3799 or [email protected] Upcoming city meetings are listed at monterey.gov/agendas For more information, call (831) 646-3935

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Tuesday, August 5, 2025
4:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Police Chief, Fire Chief, Human Resources Director, Library & Museums Director, Public Works Director, City Clerk, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer, Capital Programs Coordinator, Planning Manager, Acting Assistant Fire Chief, Recreation Manager, Sustainability Coordinator, Senior Engineer, Police Lieutenant, Principal Planner, Housing Manager, Firefighters (2)
AFTERNOON SESSION (4:00 p.m.)
Call to Order
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. City Clerk Klein called the roll with the Council present as indicated above.

General Public Comments
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from: John Tilley of Monterey Commercial Property Owners Association, Anthony Mitchell, Mira Nissim, and Daniel Armendariz.

Consent Agenda
Mayor Williamson noted that members of the public had requested to pull Items 3 and 7 from Consent. He asked if the public would like to request any further items be pulled, and no request was made.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the Consent Agenda, except Items 3 and 7:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Consent: Approval of Minutes

1. July 15, 2025 Regular Meeting (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Approved

2. July 23, 2025 Special Meeting (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Approved
Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 6 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
2 Consent: Ordinances

3. 2nd Reading of the Sidewalk Vending Ordinance Update (Monterey City Code Chapter 32, Article 1, Section 3) (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5) Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Ordinance No. 3708 C.S.

Planning Manager Hill gave a brief verbal presentation.

Based on the number of people desiring to comment, Mayor Williamson limited the time per speaker to two minutes.

Public comment was received was received from vendors Mira Nissim, India Weeks, Jim Burns, Brian, Marina, Liz Grijalva, an unidentified person, and Daniel Armendariz, all in opposition to the ordinance. Comments made included speakers expressing disappointment with the proposed ordinance; disputing the factual basis of statements made by Anthony Lombardo at the July 15, 2025 meeting; alleging that the ordinance was designed to drive vendors out of business; alleging that there was no supportive health or safety data to back up the ordinance; alleging that the Council had been fed false information; stating that the health and safety concerns that had been presented were not objective and accounted to economic animus; stating that the vendors were a draw for visitors to come to Monterey; stating that an accident was imminent were "absurd"; alleging that the Wharf's Whalefest had blocked pedestrian passage; alleging prejudice against street vendors who were being used as scapegoats for broader health and safety concerns relating to the Wharf; sharing information on a recent e-bike collision on the Recreation Trail; expressing concern that the regulations would push out vendors and stop them from providing for their families; asserting that the decision would be challenged and was illegal and morally wrong; stating that the reduction of space size was unfair; and stating that the numbers given regarding emergency vehicle clearance were not adding up.

On question from the Council, Planning Manager Hill provided the rough number of square feet (416 sq. ft.) that would be available for street vending at the Wharf under the new regulations.

The Council discussed the matter. It was stressed that the Council was not prejudiced against street vendors and that the proposed ordinance was not intended to attack any group but rather to bring clarity to the vendor regulations. The difficulty of the conversation was acknowledged but it was stated that the ordinance was supported citing the importance of safety and navigation in busy areas, noting that the crowded state of the area was different dependent on the time that a photo was taken but stressing that the Council had made personal observations of congestion in the area. The emergency vehicle issue was intended to make sure there was space for an emergency vehicle to respond in an emergency. It was stated that it was disappointing that there had not been a greater opportunity to collaborate and find common ground. The Council expressed that it was sensitive to the vendors' needi to succeed in their businesses but it was noted that allowing larger vendor spaces would reduce the number of vendors and it was stressed that the ordinance presented a balanced compromise for the limited space available.

It was stated that many individuals had been heard on the matter. The Council agreed to move forward with the ordinance while remaining open to evaluating its effectiveness after implementation.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 3708 C.S.:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 7 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
3 Consent: Resolutions

4. Adopt Resolution Certifying Compliance with State Law with Respect to Levying Assessments and Special Taxes; and Approve the Agreement with Monterey County (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-077 C.S.

5. Award Professional Services Contract for Independent Audit Services to CliftonLarsonAllen Wealth Advisors, LLP and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement. (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-078 C.S.

6. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Hinderliter, de Llamas and Associates for Transient Occupancy Tax Audit Services (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-079 C.S.

7. Close and Defund Four (4) Neighborhood and Community Improvement Program (NCIP) Projects, Approve Funding to Cut-Off Projects from the Approved FY2024/25 NCIP Project List, and Authorize the Finance Director to Appropriate Funding (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Resolution No. 25-080 C.S. as amended to add a Tier II seismic evaluation of Fire Station 12
Public comment was received from: Tom Reeves, who said that his concern about a deck had been addressed as the deck in question was no longer part of the scope, and urged that the Council refer the matter of Fire Station 12 to the NCIP Committee to approve expansion of the project scope to include a rigorous seismic analysis.

On question from the Council, City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Easterling provided further details regarding the history of the scope of the Fire Station 12 project, which was described as originally addressing immediate needs but had expanded as the project progressed due to increased costs and the discovery of additional structural repair needs. He said that City staff was trying to stay within a reasonable budget and stay within the immediate needs that had come forward, but that the scope could be adjusted at the pleasure of the Council. He explained that at a high level there was not an imminent concern about seismic risk to the Fire Station 12 building, but that a Tier II seismic analysis would cost approximately $15,000 and could give more confidence moving forward and provide insight into potentially needed seismic improvements.

On question from the Council, Senior Engineer Paulding reported to the Council on the reason for recommending closure of the Mar Vista Reconstruction Design project, explaining that there was not neighborhood support because of resident concerns about lost parking and safety. He explained that it was the NCIP process that required the full agreement of the neighborhood, not the Council's, and agreed with the Council that if directed, the City could proceed with the project despite lack of neighborhood support. He provided insight into the process of moving funds to the undergrounding project and assured the Council that the funds would be used for undergrounding purposes. He discussed NCIP project completion rates, which he said was roughly 12 projects completed annually, while he noted that the Council had approved 33 projects and that the list continued to grow. The Council expressed interest in looking into potentially revising the NCIP process that currently required full neighborhood support for a project to move forward.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 3, Packet Page 8 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
4 On question from the Council, Matt Frantz, structural engineer with ZFA, explained that the project scope for the Fire Station 12 building already included voluntary seismic strengthening work, and provided insight into what the Tier II seismic analysis could add to the scope of the project at additional cost.

The Council discussed the matter. Support was expressed for the staff recommendation and it was stated that spending $15,000 for the tier two seismic evaluation would be a logical, diligent thing to do.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Smith, and seconded by Councilmember Rasch, tp adopt Resolution No. 25-080 C.S., as amended to add a Tier II seismic evaluation of Fire Station

12. The Council discussed the motion. It was stated that the Council should revisit the NCIP process to consider potential refinements such as ensuring that projects with significant public benefit could move forward without 100% neighborhood consensus, and to address staff capacity and the ability to timely complete projects. Overall it was stressed that the NCIP should do the right thing by the general public. The topic of what it would involve to revive a project included discussion of the "Casanova Ave, 500 Block Sidewalk" project in relation to upcoming development, and timing considerations for NCIP projects in relation to development concerns.

The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

8. Authorize the City of Monterey Cemetery El Encinal to Buy Back Cemetery Lot 9 in Block 268 for $2,872.75 Payable to Mr. Ron Cota (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-081 C.S.

End of Consent Agenda
Afternoon Session Items
Public Appearance (Afternoon)

9. Receive an Update and Provide Direction to Staff on the Development of 2025 Climate Action Plan (CAP) (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Approved and accepted report, provided feedback This item was heard after Item 10. Sustainability Manager Terrasas gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. During the presentation, Councilmember Barber left the Chamber from 6:26 p.m. to 6:28 p.m.

Public comment was received from: Esther Malkin, who highlighted the need to incorporate renters in the plan and asked how landlords could be incentivized in a way that would not pass along the costs to renters; and Laura Davis of LandWatch Monterey County, who spoke in support of the City's efforts, and specifically requested that the vehicle miles traveled ("VMT") analysis uses an origin destination model and direct the consultants to include an evaluation of whether building more housing to address the jobs/housing imbalance would help reduce VMT and to what extent, in line with the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation ("RHNA") allocation and Housing Element.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 4, Packet Page 9 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
5 A motion was introduced by Councilmember Smith, and seconded by Councilmember Barber, to approve and accept the report.

The Council discussed the matter. Interest was expressed in looking into the points brought up by LandWatch and Ms. Malkin. The importance was stressed of engaging with the community and interest was expressed in learning about staff's plan for outreach to low-income and disadvantaged community members. It was suggested that staff contact organizations that specifically represent those parts of the community. Interest was expressed in receiving a timeline showing the work status of all the different elements of the Climate Action Plan. It was urged that the City develop a policy to disincentivize the use of natural gas. It was requested to prioritize the walking and bicycling goal.

The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

10. Authorize the Mayor to Sign a Letter and Submit Public Comment to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to Reconsider the Long-Term Water Demand Forecasts in the Proposed Decision for Application 21-11-024 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) -- continued from July 23, 2025
Action: Approved letter (4-1, Councilmember Smith voting no) Based on the number of attendees who expressed that they were attending the meeting for this item, this item was heard first of the afternoon public appearances.

Mayor Williamson gave a brief verbal presentation. Councilmember Smith left the Chamber from 5:35 p.m. to 5:37 p.m.

Public comment in support of the letter stated: that there would be plenty of water available in the near future; that the estimates of California-American Water ("Cal Am") were very inaccurate, that Cal Am had no track record of producing any water through any alternate water project, and that they made a point to obstruct innovative water projects; that the community used less water than projected; that this was a justice issue because access to water complicated the building of affordable housing in the area; and was received from Pat Venza, Sylvia Shih, Alice Ann Glenn, Melodie Chrislock of Public Water Now, Margaret-Anne Coppernoll, and Laura Davis of LandWatch Monterey County.

Public comment opposing the letter referred to a statement attributed to the Monterey County Water Resource Agency that recommended caution regarding cities making land use decisions based on perception of future water supply; discussed the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project and asserted that Pure Water Monterey was never meant to provide the majority of water, stating it would be a serious problem if Monterey One Water (M1W) were to lose a few sources of water; expressed concern about water supply during any future drought; asserted that the traditional three-pronged approach was required to ensure the area gets the water it needs longterm; expressed concern that the City Council was getting involved in something that should be left to experts; expressed disappointment that the letter had been sent on City letterhead without public discourse; asserted that water demand numbers were hard to pin down and that the key issue moving forward was supply, not demand; and was received from: John Tilley of the Monterey Commercial Property Owners Association, Carol Chorbajian, Rick Aldinger and Gary Cursio of the Monterey County Hospitality Association, Christopher Bunn of the Monterey County Farm Bureau, and Adam Pinterits.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 5, Packet Page 10 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
6 During public comments, Councilmember Garcia left the Chamber from 5:55 to 5:57 p.m.

The Council discussed the matter.

In opposition to the letter, it was expressed that the Council should not be taking a City position because they were not privy to the details, that the numbers were under dispute and that informed members of the public and the staff of the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) had vouched for the higher number. It was noted that the matter had been postponed by a lot of initiative from the political side. Concern was expressed about having only one voice advocate to a state agency on a matter on which the community was divided.

In support of the letter, it was stated that taking a position on the water issue was an appropriate municipal interest and that the water supply issues impacted residents' quality of life. The need was emphasized for affordable and sustainable water solutions and the importance was stressed of addressing water supply issues to enable housing development for the community. It was noted that farmers had had the opportunity to develop their own recycled water plant for many years but had not done so due to the high cost and because one already existed in the region. The unaffordable and unsustainable water rates were referenced and it was expressed that time after time, Cal Am had acted against the interest of its customers and that the letter would send a message to the community that there was an alternative and that members of the community were advocating for change. It was stated that the the Council should base its actions on facts and trust experts, and that many studies had been done, and that federal and state agencies would not have approved a project that did not have reliable source water. It was expressed that if the community kept arguing over the matter it would muddy the waters for the conversation that needed to happen with the State Water Resources Control Board. It was stressed that the City needed housing now.

Regarding the use of City letterhead for the letter before receiving Council approval, concern was expressed about the breach in the Council's governance process. It was suggested that the governance resolution should be reviewed to ensure proper following of procedures in the future.

On a motion by Councilmember Barber, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, the City Council authorized the letter
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Williamson NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Smith

11. Provide Direction to Staff on the Executive Recruitment for City Manager (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20 Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5 Section 15061)
Action: On consensus, directed staff to issue a Request for Proposals for an executive recruitment firm and bring the top three proposals back to the Council This item was heard at the beginning of the evening session after the recess. Human Resources Director Neal gave a verbal presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. On question, City Manager Uslar explained the recruitment process that had been used in 2018 to fill the position, following which he was appointed.

Public comment was received from: Nelson Vega and Lori Mazzuca, who both spoke in favor of employing a recruiting firm for a full external executive search; and Ross Pounds of the Monterey Firefighter Association, who spoke in favor of appointing Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira to the role of City Manager.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 6, Packet Page 11 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
7 The Council discussed the matter. It was stressed that while it was an important process to do a full and robust executive search, qualified internal candidates were encouraged to apply. It was stressed that there must be outreach to community stakeholders, including residents, the employee unions, and the business community, to build a profile of what the City wants from its City Manager. In order to keep the process fair, structured, and streamlined it was agreed that utilizing an executive recruitment firm for a full recruitment would be the appropriate and most professional choice. It was expressed that it would be ideal to have a replacement selected before City Manager Uslar's retirement.

On consensus, the Council directed staff to issue a Request for Proposals ("RFP") for an executive recruitment firm and to bring the top three proposals back to the Council to make a selection.

12. Update the Governance Policy to Provide for a Mayor/Vice Mayor Subcommittee to Interview and Nominate Applicants to Boards, Commissions, and Committees, and Update the Council’s 2025 Appointments Chart (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-082 C.S. as amended to offer two interview times and 15 minute interviews; and determined that the Council would send proposed application questions to staff to incorporate into a revised boards, commissions, and committees application
This item was heard second after Item 11, at the beginning of the evening session after the recess. City Clerk Klein gave a verbal staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. It was noted by the Council that the Governance Policy currently in place did not allow for the use of City letterhead by individual Councilmembers for policy purposes. Regarding the subcommittee developing standards such as interview questions, it was asserted by the Council that these should come to the full body for approval, because otherwise other members who were not on the subcommittee would not have a voice in the matter.

Public comment was received from: Tom Reeves, who said that the subcommittee standards should come before the Council for review and approval; and Lori Mazzuca, who referred to Governance Policy Section K (Letterhead Use by Councilmembers) and described the letter to the CPUC having been sent prior to receiving Council approval as a breach of public policy (item 10 on this agenda). During public comment, Councilmember Smith left the Chamber from 8:05 p.m. to 8:07 p.m.

The Council discussed the matter.

Regarding subcommittee standards and guidelines, such as interview questions to be asked of applicants, some concern was expressed about the lack of participation from non-subcommittee members in the initial process. It was suggested that the subcommittee bring back its guidelines and standards to the full Council for approval, and the Council discussed how involved the full Council should be considering that the subcommittee's recommendations would come to the Council for review and for the full Council's action.

In the interest of maintaining efficiency, it was noted that anything that the Council wanted to dictate to the subcommittee could be done in advance at this meeting. It was suggested that the Council add to the policy to offer two interview times to each applicant in the interest of flexibility, and that interviews be 15 minutes each. It was suggested that part of the concern around interview questions could be resolved by having the boards, commissions, and committees application be more robust with questions specific to each advisory body. Application questions preferred by the Council included asking applicants whether they had attended a meeting of the Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 7, Packet Page 12 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
8 body to which they wished to be appointed, to describe their background in the specific matter of that body, and whether there was something in that body in which they hold a specific interest or something specific that they were interested in accomplishing. The Council agreed that they would send additional questions to the City Clerk. It was stated that with robust body-specific answers in the application, the subcommittee could be flexible and ask more open-ended questions in the interview to get a better sense of the applicants and their ability to communicate and respond on the spot.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Barber, and seconded by Councilmember Garcia, to adopt Resolution No. 25-082 C.S., as amended to offer two interview times and 15 minute interviews, and determined that the Council would send proposed application questions to staff to incorporate into a revised boards, commissions, and committees application.

Regarding the use of City Council letterhead, the Council revisited its Governance Policy on the subject, due to a concern raised about a letter sent by the Mayor (agenda item 10), which was deemed a violation of the policy. Mayor Williamson acknowledged the issue, took responsibility, and stated that the matter could be addressed in a future agenda item. Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira clarified that the error was made with staff's erroneous approval, and City Attorney Davi noted that the public comment submitted to the CPUC in the official docket did not appear to include City letterhead. It was resolved that the Council would agendize the item.

The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Adjourn to Closed Session
Public comment on the closed session was not received.

Closed Session (Afternoon)

13. (A) Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1) -- continued from July 23, 2025:

1. City of Monterey v. Marianne McNicol (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV001205)

2. City of Monterey v. Leslie J. Flores, Trustee (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 24CV000750)

3. Ashley Ellcessor v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 24CV000649)

4. Francisca Moralez v. City of Monterey et al. (United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 22-CV-07540)

5. Richard Rosendale v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV000879)

6. Ronald Rogers v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 23CV003206)

7. Pacific Western Bank v. City and Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVSB2212212; Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No.

E082907)

8. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. v. City of Monterey (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 18CV329015)

9. Stronghold Engineering, Inc. v City of Monterey (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. CVR12103427)
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 8, Packet Page 13 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
9 10. Save Tarpy Flats v. City of Monterey (Monterey County Superior Court Case No. 24 CV005125)

11. Ruttschow v. City of Monterey (Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Case Nos.

ADJ17283108, ADJ1491826)

12. Silva v. City of Monterey (Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Case No. Case No. ADJ17523531)
(B) Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(2):

1. Alexiou, Workers Compensation Claim No. 21MON056

2. Woltman, Workers Compensation Claim No. 24MON001
(Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: In the matter of Ruttschow v. City of Monterey, confidential direction was given on a unanimous roll call vote to legal counsel; In the matter of Silva v. City of Monterey, confidential direction was given on a unanimous roll call vote to legal counsel; In the matter of Alexiou, confidential direction was given on a unanimous roll call vote to legal counsel; and in the matter of Woltman, confidential direction was given on a unanimous roll call vote to legal counsel; The remaining matters were not heard

14. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1): Joseph Barboa v. City of Monterey (CRD Case No. 202403-23873807) (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, the Council gave confidential direction to legal counsel
Recess
The Council recessed at 7:08 p.m. and reconvened at 7:17 p.m.

Reconvene
EVENING SESSION AGENDA (Approximately 7:00 p.m.)
Pledge of Allegiance
Councilmember Garcia led the Pledge.

General Public Comments, Continued
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Esther Malkin and Nina Beety.

Announcements from Closed Session
Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira reported out from the closed session as indicated in the actions recorded for closed session items 13 and 14 above.

Evening Session Items
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 9, Packet Page 14 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
10 Public Hearing (Evening)

15. Adopt the Planning Commission Recommendation and Approve a 1st Reading of Ordinances Amending Chapter 33 and Chapter 38 of the Monterey City Code to Implement the Provisions of California Senate Bill 9 and Housing Element Program I-J Allowing for Ministerial Approval of Qualifying Residential Developments and Lot Splits (Not a Project under Division 13, Commencing with Section 21000, of the Public Resources Code)
Action: Passed two ordinances to second readings (3-2, Councilmembers Rasch and Smith voting no)
Principal Planner Roveri gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

During the question period, Councilmember Barber left the Chamber from 8:52 p.m. to 8:55 p.m.

Councilmember Garcia left the Chamber from 9:02 p.m. to 9:03 p.m.

Based on the number of individuals wishing to comment, Mayor Williamson limited the time per speaker to two minutes.

Public comments opposing or expressing concern regarding the ordinances: stressed anticipated impacts on infrastructure, water supply, parking, fire safety, and the effects of increased density, traffic, noise, and pollution on neighborhood character; questioned who would pay for the changes; expressed concerns about Monterey's car dependency; asserted that the City's housing problem was the result of years of neglectful housing policy and should be addressed with zoning; suggested the Council consider reducing the cost of issuing permits; asserted that they would not guarantee housing affordability; asked about the source for increased water needs; encouraged the City to undertake or join in on legal action against Senate Bill 9 ("SB9") and emphasized its impact on R1 neighborhoods; suggested the Council postpone action until external litigation regarding compliance by charter cities was resolved, or if the ordinances were adopted but litigation later showed that charter cities did not have to comply, that it come back for reevaluation; described SB9 as overreach by the state; suggested the City develop restrictive objective standards for housing units to minimize impacts on neighborhoods; encouraged the Council to adopt only the four units per parcel that were mandated by the state, not six; urged the Council to avoid rushing the implementation of SB9, citing the lack of urgency as no SB9 projects had yet been built in Monterey; criticized the lack of public outreach and said the public needed more time to grapple with the issue; and was received from: Char Carter, Nancy Soule, Marta Kraftzeck, Cecilia Moreno, Nelson Vega, Tom Reeves, Adam Pinterits, Nina Beety, and Lori Mazzuca.

Public comments in favor of the ordinances, or expressing that compliance was a requirement of law: criticized the public for not opposing SB9 earlier at the State level; acknowledged the inevitability of SB9 but questioned the lack of parking requirements; suggested adding affordability requirements to the four-unit option; argued that the ordinances would alleviate the housing crisis by increasing density and affordability through faster and cheaper permitting; supported SB9 as a way to create affordable homeownership opportunities for local workers; emphasized the importance of gentle density and compliance with safety and parking requirements; and was received from: Esther Malkin, Laura Davis of Landwatch, Gabriel Sanders of the Monterey Opportunity Housing Trust.

During public comments, Councilmember Smith left the Chamber from 9:13 p.m. to 9:15 p.m.

A motion was introduced by Mayor Williamson, and seconded by Councilmember Garcia, to pass the ordinances to second readings.

Council discussed the matter and the motion.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 10, Packet Page 15 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
11 In support of the ordinances, it was stated that any kind of zoning law change resulted in voices expressing "not in my backyard" sentiments, but it was stressed that there was a significant housing crisis in California and that the current lack of affordable housing was a quality of life issue, and if the City of Monterey did not do its part to help address the issue, it would only add to the problem. The need was emphasized to comply with state requirements and to do what the City could to move in the direction of more affordable housing.

In opposition, it was stated that the State was making a mistake in intruding on land use. It was stated that the Council had alternatives beyond approving the ordinances through for adoption.

Opposition was expressed for allowing six units on one parcel, citing concerns about overdensification, affordability, and community pushback. It was argued that the Council should delay action until pending litigation and Supreme Court decisions provided greater clarity about SB9's ability to dictate action to charter cities.

Councilmember Rasch a proposed friendly amendment that would remove incentives for six units and instead limit the number of units per lot to four.

The mover declined the friendly amendment, stating that the City had already taken a position and approved the Housing Element, and needed to move forward with it. It was stated that changing the number would put more strain on the City's planning staff who were already struggling to meet statutory deadlines. On the other hand, it was expressed that there had not been sufficient public outreach and that the matter of six units had not been transparent at the time of the Housing Element's adoption or the public would have disagreed with it then.

The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Williamson
NOES: 2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Rasch, Smith
Public Appearance (Evening)

16. Approve Changes to Rental Assistance Program (RAP) Guidelines (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15601) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 25-083 C.S. and directed staff to clearly exempt medical debt in the Excessive Debt section of the Guidelines, and change Unit Eligibility language to remove the term "too expensive" so that it referred only to the specific cost burden limit
Housing and Community Development Coordinator Verania gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. During the presentation, Councilmember Smith left the Chamber from 9:48 p.m. to 9:50 p.m. and Councilmember Rasch left the Chamber from 9:59 p.m. to 10:0 p.m. Council interested in prioritizing children, requiring assessment with a financial advisor.

Public comment was received from: Elouise Shim, who objected to characterization of some people as perpetually low-income; Adam Pinterits, who spoke in support of the program and of refining the process; and Esther Malkin, who said that the program was supposed to help people who earned too much to qualify for programs for very low income individuals. During public comments, Councilmember Barber left the Chamber from 10:05 p.m. to 10:07 p.m.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Garcia, and seconded by Councilmember Rasch, to approved Resolution No. 25-083 C.S.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 11, Packet Page 16 City Council Minutes August 5, 2025
12 The Council discussed potential further changes to the guidelines, such as to limit assistance to one month instead of denying eligibility or to define a qualifying event that would allow an unapproved program applicant to become eligible, or to prioritize applicants dealing with medical conditions, domestic abuse, or who are seniors or have children.

On question, Housing Manager Wyatt provided clarity on what was meant by excessive debt and provided an example of $50,000 in credit card debt.

Mayor Williamson introduced a friendly amendment, which was approved by the mover and seconder, to direct staff to clearly exempt medical debt in the Excessive Debt section of the Guidelines, and change Unit Eligibility language to remove the term "too expensive" so that it referred only to the specific cost burden limit.

The Council suggested that City staff bring a status report back to the Council at the mid-year point.

The motion carried by the following vote:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Council Comments
Councilmember Garcia thanked the Villa Del Monte Neighborhood Association for an enjoyable barbecue that he attended with the Mayor.

Councilmember Smith reported on a recent meeting he had attended of the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) Rail Committee meeting and gave details of an upcoming board meeting for Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST). He remarked on the success of the recent NTT IndyCar event at Laguna Seca, and alerted all that the Monterey Peninsula Unified School District (MPUSD) schools were about to begin the new school year.

Mayor Williamson led the room in singing "Happy Birthday" to Councilmember Garcia.

City Manager Reports
City Manager Uslar shared details of the successful end-of-summer celebration event at Jacks Park, and notified the Council that the Monterey Fire Department had sent fire personnel and a wildfire engine to Gifford Fire in Santa Maria.

Adjournment
The Council adjourned at 10:35 p.m. in memory of Monterey residents James Vincent and Jamie Lee Tabscott, and Salinas resident Steve Eugene Clatterbuck, victims of the Pacific Grove plane crash. The Mayor announced that the remaining closed session topics would not be heard at this meeting.

Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 1., Item Page 12, Packet Page 17 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Richard Llantero, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract in the Amount of $710,465.06 to Stanley Semmel, an Individual Doing Business as Solex and Applied Solar Energy for POM-B617 Install Solar and Battery Sys (POM 23-035) at Presidio of Monterey ***IGSA*** (Categorically Excluded from NEPA 32 CFR, Part 651, Section II(g)(1); CEQA Not a Project)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the plans and specifications for the
POM-B617 Install Solar and Battery Sys (POM
23-035) (“Project”) which are available in the
office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and
granting the Public Works Director, or their
designee, the authority to approve all
amendments and addenda thereto as
necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awarding a Construction Contract for the
Grand Total Bid in the Amount of $710,465.06
to Stanley Semmel, an Individual Doing
Business as Solex and Applied Solar Energy
for POM-B617 Install Solar and Battery Sys
(POM 23-035) (“Project”);

4. Authorizing staff to expend up to an additional
10% for unforeseen construction contingencies
for timely completion of the Project; and

5. Authorizing the City Manager, or their
designee, to execute the contract upon the
receipt of information required by the call for
bids and, if necessary, to execute contract
amendments for the expenditure of the
authorized contingency funds.

VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing; and maintaining a safe environment.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City of Monterey is
recommended to award a
$710,465.06 construction contract
to Solex/Applied Solar Energy for
installing solar panels and battery
systems at Buildings 617 and 624 at
the Presidio of Monterey.
 The project aims to reduce energy
demand and utility costs for the
Army, with a total system capacity
of 120kW solar power and 400kWh
battery storage.
 Construction is scheduled to begin
in October 2025 and will be
completed within six months,
including installation of 300 solar
panels, 24 battery units, and
necessary electrical
interconnections.
 Solex/Applied Solar Energy was
selected as the low bidder after a
second bid solicitation and has a
proven track record of successful
solar and battery installations.

Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 18 №11/25
Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with the City’s policy to provide services to the U.S. Department of the Army through the Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) between the City of Monterey and the Federal Government.

This action is also consistent with the City’s policy to approve Public Works contracts exceeding $150,000.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

On June 17, 2025, four (4) bids were received and opened by the Finance Director’s designee as follows:

Bidder Total Bid
Solex/Applied Solar Energy $335,670.46
Solar Savings Direct Inc. $345,600.00
Hooked on Solar $563,510.00
Valley Pacific Builders $755,000.00
Basis of award for this project is based on the Base Bid.

Estimated Construction Cost:

Base Bid $335,670.46
Additive Alternate 1 $202,284.03
Additive Alternate 2 $172,510.57
Total Bid $710,465.06
Construction Contingency (10%) $71,046.51
Total Construction Cost (This Authorization) $781,511.57 Construction Management (City Staff & Indirect Cost) $ 50,000.00 Total Estimated Cost to Complete the Project $831,511.57 The Engineer’s estimate of probable cost for this project is $1,105,700.

Available Funding Sources:

POM 23-035 $1,374,000.00
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 19 №11/25
This Project has an available funding balance of $1,374,000 as of June 24, 2025. Therefore, funding is available in the project account for the construction of the Base Bid and both Additive Alternates.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The proposed action has been reviewed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and determined to qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CX). The proposed action is categorically excluded under the provisions set forth in “Part II Department of Defense, Department of the Army, 32 CFR Part 651 Environmental Analysis of Army Actions; (29 March 2002 Edition) Appendix B to Part 651-Categorical Exclusions” as follows:

II(g)(1) Routine repair and maintenance of buildings, airfields, grounds, equipment, and other facilities. Examples include, but are not limited to: Removal and disposal of asbestos-containing material (for example, roof material and floor tile) or lead-based paint in accordance with applicable regulations; removal of dead, diseased, or damaged trees; and repair of roofs, doors, windows, or fixtures (REC required for removal and disposal of ACM and LBP or work on historic structures).

All screening conditions in 32 CFR 651.29 have been met. No circumstances exist that would require an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA.

CEQA applies to discretionary projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (a).) CEQA does not apply to ministerial projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (b)(1).). There is a recognized policy consideration underlying the distinction between ministerial and discretionary projects. The purpose of CEQA is to minimize the adverse effects of new construction on the environment. To trigger CEQA compliance, the discretion must be of a certain kind; it must provide the agency with the ability and authority to mitigate environmental damage to some degree. Unless a public agency can shape the project in a way that would respond to concerns raised in an EIR, or its functional equivalent, environmental review would be a meaningless exercise.

Here, the City does not have the power to deny or condition the permit, or otherwise modify the project in ways which would mitigate environmental problems an environmental impact report might conceivably have identified. The City does not have the authority to dictate changes to the Army’s project’s design or location in response to any impacts that an environmental review might reveal, the City’s authority under CEQA is essentially ministerial and therefore no further environmental review is required by the City.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the construction contract for the Project, however this is not recommended as the Project is sufficiently funded and implements necessary improvements critical to the Army’s Mission Objective.

DISCUSSION:

Overview
Under an Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA), the City of Monterey provides services to the Department of the U.S. Army, which are fully reimbursed by the Federal government. The City coordinates a variety of projects on the Presidio of Monterey, Ord Military Community, and Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 3, Packet Page 20 №11/25
Camp Roberts, including this project to install solar panels and battery system to Buildings 617 and 624 at the Presidio of Monterey.

Project
The objective of this project is to install solar panels and battery storage systems to Buildings 617 and Building 624 to reduce the demand and lower electric utility cost for the Army. This project will install 60kW solar panels and 200kW battery storage on Building 617 and a similar system on Building 624, for a total system capable of generating 120kW of power and 400kWh of battery storage. The work, in general, consists of installing approximately 300 solar panels and 24 battery units as well as necessary converters, electrical and switchgear interconnections, utility coordination with Pacific Gas and Electric, testing, and commissioning.

The work is slated to start in October and be completed within six months.

On April 22, 2025, the City received four (4) non-responsive and/or non-responsible bids responsive for failure to submit a bid bond in a timely manner and all four were summarily rejected. A second bid solicitation on June 17, 2025 received another four (4) proposals, all of which were deemed responsive and responsible. The basis for determining the low bidder is the base bid and Solex/Applied Solar Energy, based in Pacific Grove, California, is the low bidder, with a base bid proposal of $335,670.46 and a total bid $710,465.06 including Additive Alternates 1 and 2. Due to unforeseen conditions of working on existing structures, a ten percent (10%) contingency is requested for this work. Staff is also recommending that the City Manager be delegated authority to amend the contract should expenditure of the authorized contingency funds become necessary.

Solex/Applied Solar Energy has the required license to perform the work and has successfully completed solar and battery systems installations for residential, commercial, and public entities for the City of Monterey and throughout California. Staff has checked the firm’s references and are confident with the ability of the Contractor to complete the work successfully.

RL/pl
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Evaluation Tabulation
e: Solex/Applied Solar Energy
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 4, Packet Page 21 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $710,465.06 TO

STANLEY SEMMEL, AN INDIVIDUAL DOING BUSINESS AS SOLEX AND APPLIED SOLAR ENERGY FOR POM-B617 INSTALL SOLAR AND BATTERY SYS (POM 23-035) AT PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY ***IGSA***
WHEREAS, on the 17th day of June 2025, at 2:00 p.m. the City of Monterey Finance Director’s designee received four (4) electronic bids through the City’s e-Procurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement, for the POM-B617 Install Solar and Battery Sys (POM 23-035) (“Project”);
WHEREAS, the basis of award for the project was the Base Bid; WHEREAS, Solex/Applied Solar Energy submitted the lowest responsive, responsible base bid in the amount of $335,670.46;
WHEREAS, in addition to the base bid, the City will award Additive Alternate 1 and Additive Alternate 2 for a total amount of $710,465.06; WHEREAS, a 10% contingency is requested for this project due to the uncertainties in the global economic market caused by the proposed tariffs on foreign goods and existing unforeseen conditions at the time of installation;
WHEREAS, the project is fully funded by the Department of the Army through the Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) and sufficient funding is available in the project account number POM 23-035; and
WHEREAS, the proposed action has been reviewed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and determined to qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CX).

The proposed action is categorically excluded under the provisions set forth in “Part II Department of Defense, Department of the Army, 32 CFR Part 651 Environmental Analysis of Army Actions; (29 March 2002 Edition) Appendix B to Part 651-Categorical Exclusions” as follows:

II(g)(1) Routine repair and maintenance of buildings, airfields, grounds, equipment, and other facilities. Examples include, but are not limited to: Removal and disposal of asbestoscontaining material (for example, roof material and floor tile) or lead-based paint in accordance with applicable regulations; removal of dead, diseased, or damaged trees; and repair of roofs, doors, windows, or fixtures (REC required for removal and disposal of ACM and LBP or work on historic structures).

All screening conditions in 32 CFR 651.29 have been met. No circumstances exist that would require an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 5, Packet Page 22 CEQA applies to discretionary projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (a).) CEQA does not apply to ministerial projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (b)(1).).

There is a recognized policy consideration underlying the distinction between ministerial and discretionary projects. The purpose of CEQA is to minimize the adverse effects of new construction on the environment. To trigger CEQA compliance, the discretion must be of a certain kind; it must provide the agency with the ability and authority to mitigate environmental damage to some degree. Unless a public agency can shape the project in a way that would respond to concerns raised in an EIR, or its functional equivalent, environmental review would be a meaningless exercise.

Here, the City does not have the power to deny or condition the permit, or otherwise modify the project in ways which would mitigate environmental problems an environmental impact report might conceivably have identified. The City does not have the authority to dictate changes to the Army’s project’s design or location in response to any impacts that an environmental review might reveal, the City’s authority under CEQA is essentially ministerial and therefore no further environmental review is required by the City.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approves the plans and specifications for the POM-B617 Install Solar and Battery Sys (POM23-035) (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepts all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awards a Construction Contract for the Grand Total Bid in the Amount of $710,465.06 to Stanley Semmel, an Individual Doing Business as Solex and Applied Solar Energy, for POM-B617 Install Solar and Battery Sys (POM 23-035) (“Project”);

4. Authorizing staff to expend up to an additional 10% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project; and

5. Authorizing the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the call for bids and, if necessary, to execute contract amendments for the expenditure of the contingency funds authorized herein.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 6, Packet Page 23 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 7, Packet Page 24 City of Monterey
Finance Department
Rafaela King, Finance Director
580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940

EVALUATION TABULATION
General Solicitation - REBID: B617 INSTALL SOLAR AND BATTERY SYS (POM 23-035)

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
REBID: B617 INSTALL SOLAR AND BATTERY SYS (POM 23-035)
RESPONSE DEADLINE: June 17, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Tuesday, June 17, 2025

SELECTED VENDOR TOTALS
Vendor Total
Solex $335,670.46
Solar Savings Direct Inc. $345,600.00
Hooked on Solar $563,510.00
Valley Pacific Builders $755,000.00

BASE BID SCHEDULE
Vendor Total
Solex $335,670.46
Solar Savings Direct Inc. $345,600.00
Hooked on Solar $563,510.00
Valley Pacific Builders $755,000.00
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 1
Vendor Total
Hooked on Solar $0.00
Solar Savings Direct Inc. $0.00
Solex $0.00
Valley Pacific Builders $0.00
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE 2
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 8, Packet Page 25

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
REBID: B617 INSTALL SOLAR AND BATTERY SYS (POM 23-035)

Vendor Total
Hooked on Solar $0.00
Solar Savings Direct Inc. $0.00
Solex $0.00
Valley Pacific Builders $0.00
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 2., Item Page 9, Packet Page 26 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/24
ADDING ARTICLE 7 TO CHAPTER 33 OF THE MONTEREY CITY CODE, URBAN LOT SPLITS IN SINGLE FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS, TO COMPLY WITH SENATE BILL 9, AND

OTHER MINISTERIAL UPDATES TO THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 9 added Government Code section 66411.7, providing for ministerial approval of a parcel map for an Urban Lot Split, effective January 1, 2022.

Government Code section 66411.7 was further amended by SB 450, effective January 1, 2025 (together “Senate Bill 9”), to specify that this law applies to charter cities; WHEREAS, state law allows a local agency to adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions in Senate Bill 9;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey (the "City”) has implemented land use policies based on the City's General Plan, which provide an overall vision for the community and balance important community needs, and the City seeks to ensure that Senate Bill 9 projects are consistent with those policies;
The proposed amendments to the Monterey City Code implement requirements of state law and add local policies that are consistent with the state law and implement the City’s General Plan;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the provisions of this ordinance are consistent with the City's General Plan 2023-31 Housing Element Housing Action Plan Program I-J to promote and facilitate Senate Bill 9 housing as appropriate in Monterey; WHEREAS, this ordinance allows a maximum of two dwelling units of any kind per lot, including but not limited to primary dwelling units, accessory dwelling units, and junior accessory dwelling units, unless an additional unit is approved as an affordable unit incentive pursuant to City Code section 38-26.1(g)(1)(A). This illustration shows the development options with a maximum of four units that may be developed without application of the affordability incentive:

WHEREAS, this ordinance also makes other clerical amendments to Chapter 33 by renumbering and recodifying existing ordinances; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed code amendments are intended to implement Senate Bill 9 and are not considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code, as provided in Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66511.7(n).

Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 27

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DECLARES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 2: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 1, In General, Sections 33-1 through 33-8 are hereby recodified as Sections 33-1.00 through 33-1.07.

SECTION 3: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 2, Types of Subdivisions, Sections 33-9 through 33-14 are hereby recodified as Sections 33-2.00 through 33-2.05.

SECTION 4: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 2, Types of Subdivisions, section 33-2.06, Urban Lot Split, is added as follows:
“Sec. 33-2.06. Urban Lot Split. An Urban Lot Split is a one-time subdivision of an existing legal parcel in the R-E Residential Estate District, R-1 Residential Single-Family District, or PC Planned Community Zoning District where the General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential, to create no more than two new parcels of approximately equal area, pursuant to Government Code section 66411.7.

SECTION 5: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 2, section 33-14.5, Voluntary Merger of Lots, Process, is recodified and added as Section 33-2.07.

SECTION 6: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 3, Basic Design Objectives and Requirements, Sections 33-15 through 33-41 are hereby recodified as Sections 33-3.00 through 33-3.26.

SECTION 7: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 4, Exceptions, Sections 33-42 through 33-48 are hereby recodified as Sections 33-4.00 through 33-4.06.

SECTION 8: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 5, Standard Subdivisions, Division 1, Preliminary Maps, Sections 33-49 through 33-54 are hereby recodified as Sections 33-5.00 through 33-5.05.

SECTION 9: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 5, Standard Subdivisions, Division 2, Tentative Maps, Sections 33-55 through 33-64 are hereby recodified as Sections 33-5.06 through 33-5.14.

SECTION 10: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 5, Standard Subdivisions, Division 2.1, Relating to Vesting Tentative Maps, is hereby recodified as Division 3, Section 33-

5.15. SECTION 11: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 5, Standard Subdivisions, Division 3, Final Maps, Sections 33-64 through 33-78 is hereby recodified as Division 4, Section 33-5.16 through 33-5-30.

SECTION 12: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 6, Minor Subdivisions, Sections 33-79 through 33-89 is hereby recodified as Sections 33-6.00 through 33-6.10.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 28 SECTION 13: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 7, Enforcement, Sections 33-90- 33-91 is hereby recodified as Article 10, Sections 33-10.00 through 33-10.01.

SECTION 14: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 7, Urban Lot Splits in SingleFamily Zones, is added as follows:
“Article 7. Urban Lot Splits in Single-Family Zoning Districts.

Sec. 33-7.00. Purpose. This article sets forth the objective zoning and subdivision standards for Urban Lot Splits within single-family residential zones to facilitate the development of new residential housing units consistent with the City’s General Plan and to ensure sound standards to protect public health and safety.

Sec. 33-7.01. Definitions. As used in this Article:
a. “Acting in concert” means pursuing a shared goal to split adjacent lots pursuant to an agreement or understanding, whether formal or informal. b. "Adjacent parcels" means parcels of land that (1) share a common boundary or corner, or that touch each other at any point; (2) are separated at any point only by a public right-of-way, private street or way, or public or private utility, service, or access easement; or (3) separated only by other real property which is in common ownership or control of the applicant.
c. "Car share vehicle" means a motor vehicle that is operated as part of a regional fleet by a public or private car sharing company or organization and provides hourly or daily service.
d. “Common ownership or control” means property owned or controlled by the same person, persons, or entity, or by separate entities in which any shareholder, partner, member, or family member of an investor of the entity owns 10 percent or more of the interest in the property.
e. “Director” means Community Development Director or designee. f. "Lower income household" has the meaning set forth in Health & Safety Code section 50079.5.
g. “Moderate income household” has the meaning set forth in Health & Safety Code section 50093.
h. “Single-Family Zoning Districts” means property zoned R-E Residential Estate District, R-1 Residential Single-Family District, or PC Planned Community Zoning District where the General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential. i. “Specific adverse impact” is a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan land use designation, and eligibility to claim a welfare exemption under Revenue and Taxation Code section 214(g), shall not constitute a specific adverse impact.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 29 j. "Urban Lot Split" means a one-time subdivision of an existing parcel in a Single Family Zoning District into no more than two separate parcels that meet all the criteria and standards for approval set forth in this article.
k. "Very low income household" has the meaning set forth in Health & Safety Code section 50105.

Sec. 33-7.02 Urban Lot Split.
a. The City shall ministerially review and approve or deny an application for an Urban Lot Split that subdivides an existing parcel in a Single-Family Zoning District to create no more than two new parcels as provided by Government Code section 66411.7 and this article. A maximum of two dwelling units of any kind (including primary dwelling units, accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, density bonus units, and units created as a Two Unit Development pursuant to City Code section 38-26.1 et seq.) are permitted on a lot created through an Urban Lot Split.
b. Denial. If the City denies the application, within the 60-day review period the City shall return in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with the list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant. An Urban Lot Split map shall be denied for any parcel:

1. Described in Government Code section 65913.4(a)(6)(B) through (a)(6)(K), incorporated herein by reference, as that section read on September 16, 2021. Such parcels include, for example, parcels located in earthquake fault zones, hazardous waste sites, wetlands, very high fire severity zones (unless the site has adopted certain fire hazard mitigation measure), in special flood hazard areas or regulatory floodways, protected habitats, etc.;

2. Created by prior exercise of an Urban Lot Split;

3. Adjacent to a parcel that was created by prior exercise of an Urban Lot Split by the owner, or a person acting in concert with the owner of the parcel sought to be split;

4. That requires demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:

A. Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low- or very low-income;
B. Housing that is subject to any City ordinance imposing rent control;
C. Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years; or
D. A parcel on which an owner exercised the owner’s rights under Government Code section 7060 et seq. to withdraw
a unit from rent or lease within the past 15 years.

5. Located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1, or within a site that is designated as a City landmark or historic property or historic district pursuant to a City ordinance; or

6. If the building official makes a written finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 30 development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health and safety, for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. c. Approval. An Urban Lot Split map shall be approved if the following criteria are met:

1. The parcel is located within a Single-Family Residential Zone;

2. The minimum lot size for both resulting parcels created by an
Urban Lot Split is no smaller than 1,200 square feet;

3. The lots created by an Urban Lot Split are of approximately equal area, such that no resulting parcel shall be smaller than 40 percent of the lot area of the original parcel proposed for subdivision;

4. There will be no more than two dwelling units of any kind (including primary dwelling units, accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, density bonus units, and units created as a Two Unit Development pursuant to City Code section 38-26.1 et seq.) on a lot created through the Urban Lot Split;

5. No lot line would bisect any existing structure or would result in more than two dwelling units on any resulting parcel;

6. The development proposed on the parcels complies with all objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards applicable to the parcel as provided in the zoning district in which the parcel is located; provided, however, that:

A. The application of such standards shall not preclude two units, each with a unit size up to 800 square feet on the resulting parcels created pursuant to this chapter.

B. Notwithstanding subsection (6)(A) above, required rear and side yard setbacks shall equal at least four feet,
except that no setback shall be required for an existing structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure.

7. Each resulting parcel shall have access to, provide access to, or adjoin the public right-of-way. Resulting parcels that do not adjoin the public right-of-way shall provide an access easement no less than 12 feet wide and of the length required to connect the resulting parcel to the public right-of-way. This easement area shall be unobstructed and uninterrupted. The easement document shall be prepared at the owner’s expense and shall be recorded by City staff at the same time that the Urban Lot Split map is recorded. The easement shall contain a maintenance agreement to ensure shared maintenance of any shared access easements, landscaping, and private utilities, prior to final parcel map recordation. A covenant of easement shall be recorded pursuant to Monterey City Code, Article 8, Sections 33-8.00 through 33-

8.02. For purposes of meeting lot size criteria set forth in subsections (c)(2) and (c)(3) above, the easement does not Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 31 reduce the lot size of the servient tenement (the land that provides the easement).

8. Proposed adjacent or connected dwelling units shall be permitted if they meet building code safety standards and are designed sufficiently to allow separate conveyance. The proposed dwelling unit shall provide a new or separate utility connection, including a separate sewer lateral, between each proposed dwelling unit and the utility. A connection fee or capacity charge may be charged that is proportionate to the size in square feet of the proposed dwelling units or their drainage fixture unit (DFU) values. Separate electric and water submeters shall be required for the proposed dwelling unit. Separate water meters shall be required for the proposed dwelling units when the City’s water purveyor is allowed to establish new water meters.

9. Parking. One off-street parking space that meets the Parking Dimension Standards adopted by the Planning Commission shall be required for each unit created by an Urban Lot Split, except that no parking may be required where:

A. The parcel is located within one-half mile walking distance of either a stop located in a high-quality transit corridor, as defined in Public Resources Code section 21155(b), or a major transit stop, as defined in Public Resources Code section 21064.3; or
B. There is a designated parking area for one or more carshare vehicles within one block of the parcel.

10. Compliance with Subdivision Map Act. The Urban Lot Split shall conform to all applicable objective requirements of the Subdivision Map Act (commencing with Government Code Section 66410), except as otherwise expressly provided in Government Code section 66411.7 and this article. Notwithstanding Government Code section 66411.1, no dedications of rights-of-way or the construction of offsite improvements may be required as a condition of approval for an Urban Lot Split, although easements may be required for the provision of public services and facilities.

11. The correction of nonconforming zoning conditions may not be required as a condition of approval.

12. Parcels created by an Urban Lot Split shall be used for residential uses only and shall not be used for rentals of less than 30 days.

13. If any existing dwelling unit is proposed to be demolished, the owner will comply with the replacement housing provisions of Government Code section 66300.5 or successor provision.
d. Application Processing.

1. Applications for an Urban Lot Split shall be submitted to, and made on forms kept and updated by, the Director, who shall be responsible for determining within 60 days of receipt of a completed application whether an Urban Lot Split meets the requirements for ministerial approval.

2. An application shall include an affidavit from the property owner, signed under penalty of perjury that:

A. The owner (if multiple owners, at least one owner) intends to occupy one of the housing units on the newly created parcels as their principal residence for a minimum of three Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 6, Packet Page 32 years from the date of the recording of the parcel map.

This subsection shall not apply to a "community land trust," as defined Revenue and Taxation Code section
402.1(a)(11)(C)(ii) or a "qualified nonprofit corporation" as described in Revenue and Taxation Code section 214.15.

B. If any existing housing is proposed to be altered or demolished, the owner shall state that none of the
conditions listed in subsection (b)(4) exist and shall provide a comprehensive history of the occupancy of the units to be altered or demolished for the past three years (five years if an existing unit is to be demolished).

C. That neither the owner or applicant, nor any person acting in concert with the owner or applicant, has previously
subdivided an adjacent parcel using an Urban Lot Split.

3. The City Manager or their designee is authorized to execute the restrictive covenant required under this Section on behalf of the City and to deliver any approvals or consents required by the covenant. Prior to approval and recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall record a restrictive covenant in the form prescribed by the city attorney, which shall run with the land and provide for the following:

A. A prohibition against further subdivision of the parcel using the Urban Lot Split procedures as provided for in this
article;
B. A prohibition on non-residential uses of the parcel created by an Urban Lot Split; and
C. A prohibition against renting or leasing the units for fewer than 30 consecutive calendar days.

D. A maximum of two dwelling units of any kind, including but not limited to primary dwelling units, accessory dwelling units, and junior accessory dwelling units, are permitted on a lot created through an Urban Lot Split unless approved as an affordable unit incentive pursuant to City Code
section 38-26.1(g)(1)(A).

SECTION 15: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby not applicable to Urban Lot Splits in Single Family Residential Zones.

SECTION 16: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 8, Merger of Substandard Lots, Sections 33-100 through 33-102 are hereby recodified as Article 9, Sections 33-9.00 through 33-9.02.

SECTION 17: Monterey City Code, Chapter 33, Article 9, Covenant of Easement, is hereby recodified as Article 8, Sections 33-8.00 through 33-8.08.

SECTION 18: If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 7, Packet Page 33 SECTION 19: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 8, Packet Page 34 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/24

AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE MINISTERIAL APPROVAL OF

TWO-UNIT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN SINGLE-FAMILY ZONING DISTRICTS THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, on September 16, 2021, Senate Bill 9 added Government Code section 65852.21, allowing additional housing units on properties within single-family zones; WHEREAS, state law allows a local agency to adopt an ordinance to implement the provisions in Senate Bill 9;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey (the "City”) has implemented land use policies based on the City's General Plan, which provide an overall vision for the community and balance important community needs, and the City seeks to ensure that Senate Bill 9 projects are consistent with those policies. The proposed amendments to the Monterey City Code implement requirements of state law and add local policies that are consistent with the state law and implement the City’s General Plan;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the provisions of this ordinance are consistent with the City's General Plan 2023-31 Housing Element Housing Action Plan Program I-J to promote and facilitate Senate Bill 9 housing as appropriate in Monterey. Further, to promote housing opportunities for very low-income families in single-family neighborhoods in Monterey, this ordinance would allow up to six units on what is currently a single-family parcel if the property owner commits to making at least one of the additional units affordable to households earning less than 50 percent of the Monterey County area median income (AMI) through a longterm affordability agreement; WHEREAS, this ordinance allows for the maximum development of four units per parcel.

An example of development options is demonstrated in this illustration:

WHEREAS, the proposed code amendments are intended to implement Senate Bill 9 and are not considered a project under Division 13 (commencing with Section 21000) of the Public Resources Code, as provided in Government Code Sections 65852.21(j) and 66511.7(n).

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 9, Packet Page 35 NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: The following definitions are added in alphabetical order to Chapter 38, Article 3, Section 38-11, Definitions, as follows:
“Single-Family Zoning Districts” means property zoned R-E Residential Estate District, R-1 Residential Single-Family District, or PC Planned Community Zoning District where the General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential.
“Specific adverse impact” is a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. Inconsistency with the zoning ordinance or general plan land use designation, and eligibility to claim a welfare exemption under Revenue and Taxation Code section 214(g), shall not constitute a specific adverse impact.
"Two-Unit Development" means a development that proposes no more than two new units or proposes to add one new unit to one existing unit on a lot. For purposes of this definition, a unit means any dwelling unit, including but not limited to a primary dwelling unit, an accessory dwelling unit, or a junior accessory dwelling unit.

SECTION 4: Chapter 38, Article 5A, Two-Unit Development in Single Family Residential Zoning Districts, is hereby added as follows:
“Section 38-26.1, Two-Unit Development.
a. Purpose. This section sets forth special regulations applicable to the construction of two dwelling units in the Single Family Zoning Districts pursuant to Government Code section 65852.21. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this section and the generally applicable regulations in Chapter 38, the more permissive provisions shall prevail.
b. Application Process. The City shall ministerially review and approve or deny an application for a Two-Unit Development in Single Family Zoning Districts as provided by Government Code section 65852.21 and this article. Applications for a Two-Unit Development shall be submitted to, and made on forms kept and updated by, the Community Development Director, who shall be responsible for determining within 60 days of receipt of a completed application whether a TwoUnit Development application meets the requirements for ministerial approval. c. Denial. A Two-Unit Development shall be denied for any parcel:

1. Described in Government Code section 65913.4(a)(6)(B) through (a)(6)(K), incorporated herein by reference, as that section read on September 16, 2021. Such parcels include, for example, parcels located in earthquake fault zones, hazardous waste sites, wetlands, very high fire severity zones (unless the site has adopted certain fire hazard mitigation measure), and in Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 10, Packet Page 36 special flood hazard areas or regulatory floodways, protected habitats, etc.

2. That requires demolition or alteration of any of the following types of housing:

A. Housing that is subject to a recorded covenant, ordinance, or law that restricts rents to levels affordable to persons and families of moderate, low- or very low-income.

B. Housing that is subject to any City ordinance imposing rent control.

C. Housing that has been occupied by a tenant in the last three years.

D. A parcel on which an owner exercised the owner’s rights under Government Code section 7060 et seq. to withdraw
a unit from rent or lease within the past 15 years.

3. Located within a historic district or property included on the State Historic Resources Inventory, as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1, or within a site that is designated as a City landmark or historic property or historic district pursuant to a City ordinance;

4. Created by an Urban Lot Split under Chapter 33, Article 7 that would result in more than two units of any kind per parcel, including primary dwelling units, accessory dwelling units, junior accessory dwelling units, on parcels unless there is compliance with the affordability criteria set forth in subsection (g); or

5. If the building official makes a written finding, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon public health and safety, for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific, adverse impact. d. Approval. A Two-Unit Development shall be ministerially approved if the following criteria are met:

1. The parcel is located in a Single-Family Residential Zoning District.

2. The dwelling units in the Two-Unit Development may be new construction and/or converted from an existing, permitted structure that meets the requirements of this article.

3. The proposed Two-Unit Development complies with all objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design review standards applicable to the parcel as provided in the zoning district in which the parcel is located; provided, however, that:

A. The application of such standards shall be
modified as required to physically allow the
construction of two units up to 800 square feet
each.

B. Notwithstanding subsection (3)(A), required rear
and side yard setbacks shall equal at least four
feet, except that no setback shall be required for
an existing structure or a structure constructed in
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 11, Packet Page 37 the same location and to the same dimensions as
an existing structure.

4. As defined in Monterey City Code Chapter 37, section 37-2, protected tree(s) whose dripline is within the proposed footprint of any unit constructed in a development at the time of application shall be replaced onsite. The replacement ratio shall be two replacement trees per tree impacted. Replacement tree(s) shall be provided in addition to all other required landscaping pursuant to objective standards and shall be installed prior to final occupancy of the proposed development. The replacement tree(s) shall be minimum 15 gallon container size at time of planting and be of the same size or a greater size at maturity as the tree(s) being removed. The replacement tree(s) shall be any one or more of the species listed on the City of Monterey Urban Forestry’s online list of trees suitable for Monterey, unless the tree(s) being removed are Monterey Pine, Monterey Cypress, or Coast Live Oak, then the replacement trees shall be of those same species.

5. Proposed adjacent or connected dwelling units shall be permitted if they meet building code safety standards and are designed sufficiently to allow separate conveyance. The proposed dwelling units shall provide a new or separate utility connection, including a separate sewer lateral, between the proposed dwelling units and the utility. A connection fee or capacity charge may be charged that is proportionate to the size in square feet of the proposed dwelling units or their drainage fixture unit (DFU) values. Separate electric and water submeters shall be required for the proposed dwelling units. Separate water meters shall be required for the proposed dwelling units when the City’s water purveyor is allowed to establish new water meters.

6. Parking. One off-street parking space shall be required per unit constructed via the procedures set forth in this article, except that the City shall not require any parking where:

A. The parcel is located within one-half mile walking
distance of either a stop located in a high-quality
transit corridor, as defined in Public Resources
Code section 21155(b), or a major transit stop, as
defined in Public Resources Code section
21064.3; or
B. There is a designated parking area for one or
more car-share vehicles within one block of the
parcel.

7. Dwelling units created by a Two-Unit Development may be used for residential uses only and may not be used for rentals of less than 30 days.

8. If any existing dwelling unit is proposed to be demolished, the owner will comply with the replacement housing provisions of Government Code section 66300.5 or successor provision.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 12, Packet Page 38 e. Declaration of Prior Tenancies. If any existing housing is proposed to be altered or demolished, the owner of the property proposed for a Two-Unit Development shall sign an affidavit, in the form approved by the city attorney, stating that none of the conditions listed in subsection (c)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(D) exist and shall provide a comprehensive history of the occupancy of the units to be altered or demolished for the past three years (five years if an existing unit is to be demolished).
f. Recorded Covenant. The City Manager or their designee is authorized to execute the restrictive covenant required under this Section on behalf of the City and to deliver any approvals or consents required by the covenant. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record a restrictive covenant in the form prescribed by the city attorney, which shall run with the land and provide for a prohibition on non-residential use of any units developed or constructed through the Two-Unit Development procedure, including a prohibition against renting or leasing the units for fewer than 30 consecutive calendar days. g. Affordable Unit Incentives.

1. If at least one dwelling unit in the Two-Unit Development is made available at affordable rent or affordable housing cost to a very low income household (the “Affordable Unit”), as defined in Health & Safety Code section 50105, the Two-Unit Development will qualify for the following incentives:

A. If the Two-Unit Development is developed on a
parcel created through an Urban Lot Split, the
total number of dwelling units allowed across both
parcels will be increased from four to six dwelling
units, with no more than four dwelling units
allowed on a single parcel. All three dwelling unit
types (i.e., primary dwelling units, accessory
dwelling units, and junior accessory dwelling
units) count toward this six dwelling unit limit.

B. If the requirements of the underlying residential
zoning district, any applicable overlay district, and
all other applicable provisions of this Chapter
would restrict the size of the dwelling units in a
Two-Unit Development to 800 square feet, the
size of one of the primary dwelling units in the
Two-Unit Development shall be allowed to go up
to 1,000 square feet if two or more bedrooms are
provided.

2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any new dwelling unit incorporating either or both of the incentives in Section (f)(1) above, the property owner must record a regulatory agreement against the parcel that is or will concurrently be developed with the Affordable Unit. The regulatory agreement shall be in the form provided by the City Attorney’s Office restricting the sale or rental of the Affordable Unit such that the Affordable Unit will be sold or rented to a very low income household, as defined in Health & Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 13, Packet Page 39 Safety Code section 50105, at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent (the “Regulatory Agreement”). The City Manager or their designee is authorized to execute the regulatory agreement on behalf of the City and to deliver any approvals or consents required by the covenant.

SECTION 5: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are not applicable to two unit ministerial developments processed under this ordinance.

SECTION 6: If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 3., Item Page 14, Packet Page 40 Council
Agenda Report
№07/19
FROM: Hans Uslar, City Manager
Christine Davi, City Attorney
Prepared By: Karin Salameh, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: Approve Participation in the Nationwide Opioid Litigation Settlements with Purdue Pharma L.P., the Sackler Family, Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, and Zydus and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Participation and Subdivision Agreements, and Request Direct Payments to the City (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve participation in the
nationwide settlement agreements that would resolve
opioid litigation brought by states and local political subdivisions against Purdue Pharma L.P. and the
Sackler family (collectively “Purdue”), eight opioids
manufacturers, Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma,
Indivior, Mylan, Sun, and Zydus (collectively the
“Manufacturers”), and authorize the City Manager to
sign the participation and subdivision agreements and
request a direct payment of the settlement funds to the City.

VALUE DRIVERS:

This action meets the City Council’s stated value
driver of “working to improve the quality of life of our residents.”

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: Yes
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Under the proposed Purdue settlement agreement,
California will receive a maximum of approximately
$440 million if all eligible California local governments sign on. Assuming, the City’s weighted allocation
percentage among eligible California subdivisions
remains 0.033654% and assuming a best case
scenario for participation, if the City elects to
participate, it would receive approximately $148,077 in total from the Purdue settlement. The Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is recommended to
approve participation in nationwide
opioid litigation settlements with
Purdue Pharma, the Sackler family,
and eight opioid manufacturers, and
request direct payments for opioid
remediation activities.
 The City could receive approximately
$148,077 from the Purdue settlement
and a smaller amount from the
Manufacturer settlement, with funds
distributed over multiple years.
 Settlement payments must be used
for opioid remediation activities, such
as education, disposal programs, and
behavioral health services, with
unspent funds transferred to the State
after five years.
 Participation maximizes the State's
overall settlement payment and
ensures the City's share is spent
within its jurisdiction.

Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 4.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 41 settlement will be spread over 16 annual payments unless Purdue elects to make prepayments, which can lower its overall settlement payment. If fewer subdivisions participate in the settlement agreement, the City will receive less money due to decreased incentive payments. The same is true of the Manufacturer settlement, but at a much smaller scale given that the maximum amount available to all states and subdivisions is $720 million. Given this, the City’s share of the Manufacturer settlement is likely to be less than the $41,000 received in the Kroger settlement. Portions of the Manufacturer settlement may also be distributed in the form of naloxone products.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

See the three options discussed below.

DISCUSSION:

In December 2021, the City Council authorized the City to participate in a nationwide opioid litigation settlement reached with the three largest pharmaceutical distributors – McKesson, Cardinal Health, and AmerisourceBergen – and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, including its parent corporation Johnson & Johnson, which manufactured and marketed opioids. In late 2022, similar nationwide settlements were reached with opioid manufacturers Teva and Allergan, and pharmacies Walmart, Walgreens, and CVS. In 2024, the City also elected to join the settlement with The Kroger Co.

Although the City was not a party to any of the underlying actions, it elected to participate in the settlements by executing participation agreements. For all of the previous opioid settlements, the City elected to receive direct payments and to date the City has received a total of $363,182.26 from the settlements. To date, the City has spent $62,172.40 of the settlement funds to support homeless navigation and outreach efforts. The City will continue to support strategies that connect at-risk individuals to behavioral health services and support networks.

The proposed Purdue settlement is being implemented in connection with Purdue’s bankruptcy proceedings, and consists of, among other things, a settlement of direct claims against the Sacklers held by States, local governments and other creditors. The Settlement contemplates that the Sacklers will be paying an aggregate of $6.5 billion in 16 payments over 15 years, including $1.5 billion on the settlement’s Effective Date (expected to be in 2026), though some amounts are subject to discounted prepayments. These amounts are in addition to amounts Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 42 available from the Purdue estate including amounts available on the Effective Date (expected to be around $900 million). Assuming full participation in the settlement, the maximum amount estimated to be received by the State of California and its subdivisions would be approximately $440 million. The Settlement also contains injunctive relief governing opioid dispensing practices and requires the successor-in-interest of Purdue Pharma L.P. to implement safeguards to prevent diversion of prescription opioids, and also restrict certain Sacklers from directly or indirectly engaging in the manufacturing or sale of opioids.

Separately, eight opioids manufacturers, Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, and Zydus (the “Manufacturers”) have reached nationwide settlement agreements. This settlement requires the settling Manufacturers to pay a maximum of approximately $720 million in cash to participating states and subdivisions to remediate and abate the impacts of the opioid crisis. Depending on participation by states and subdivisions, the Settlements require:
 Alvogen to immediately pay up to approximately $19 million;  Amneal to pay up to approximately $74 million over 10 years, and to provide either approximately $177 million of its generic version of the drug Narcan or up to an additional approximately $44 million in cash;
 Apotex to immediately pay up to approximately $65 million;  Hikma to immediately pay up to approximately $98 million, and to provide either approximately $35 million of its naloxone product or up to an additional approximately $7 million in cash;
 Indivior to pay up to approximately $75 million over five years, a portion of which, at the election of the state, could be paid in the form of Indivior’s branded buprenorphine and/or nalmefene products with a value of up to $140 million.;  Mylan to pay up to approximately $290 million over nine years;  Sun to immediately pay up to approximately $32 million; and  Zydus to immediately pay up to approximately $15 million.

The Manufacturers settlements also contain injunctive relief governing opioid marketing, sale, distribution, and/or distribution practices and require the Manufacturers to implement safeguards to prevent diversion of prescription opioids.

As with the prior settlements, the City has three options regarding the settlement with Purdue and the Manufacturers. It can:

1. Not participate in the settlements. The City's share of the settlement payment would then go to the State of California and the overall payment to the State would not be maximized as a portion of the overall payment is based on the number of participating local entities.

2. Participate in the settlements, but not request a direct payment. The City's share of both settlement payments would then go to the County of Monterey. The County is not required to spend the City's share within the City's jurisdiction, but may spend it anywhere in the County. The County would be responsible for all reporting requirements relating to the funds.

3. Participate in the Purdue and Manufacturer settlements and request a direct payment. The settlement payments may only be used for opioid remediation activities specified in the agreements, including but not limited to providing funding for medication assisted treatment (MAT) education and awareness training to law enforcement and other first responders, community drug disposal programs, training Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 43 for first responders to participate in prearrest diversion programs, post-overdose response teams, or similar strategies that connect at-risk individuals to behavioral health services and supports, etc. Funds received and not spent in accordance with the agreement within 5 years must be transferred to the State. Additionally, annual reports must be filed with the State regarding the use of the funds.

Staff recommends that the City participate in the settlements with Purdue and the Manufacturers and request direct payments (option 3). To do so, the City must release its claims against Purdue and the Manufacturers in exchange, for the settlement payments, which the City can use for opioid remediation activities.

The deadline for eligible cities and counties to join the Purdue Pharma and Sackler family settlements is September 30, 2025. The deadline for eligible cities and counties to join the Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, and Zydus settlements is October 8, 2025. Additional information and documents regarding the national settlements and individual state allocations can be found on the Settlements website at https://nationalopioidsettlement.com/.

Attachments: 1. Resolution
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
monterey.gov/submittedcomments
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 44 RESOLUTION NO. __- ___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

APPROVING PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONWIDE OPIOID LITIGATION SETTLEMENTS WITH PURDUE PHARMA L.P., THE SACKLER FAMILY, ALVOGEN, AMNEAL, APOTEX,

HIKMA, INDIVIOR, MYLAN, SUN, AND ZYDUS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER

TO EXECUTE THE PARTICIPATION AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENTS AND REQUEST

DIRECT PAYMENTS TO THE CITY
WHEREAS, nationwide opioid litigation settlement agreements were reached with Purdue Pharma L.P. and the Sackler family (collectively “Purdue”), eight opioids manufacturers, Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, and Zydus (collectively the “Manufacturers”);
WHEREAS, although the City of Monterey was not a party to any of the underlying cases, it and other cities and counties may elect to participate in the settlements by executing the participation and subdivision agreements;
WHEREAS, under the proposed Purdue settlement agreement, the City would receive a maximum amount of approximately $148,077. The City’s payment from the Manufacturer settlements is likely to be less than the $41,000 received in the prior Kroger settlement based upon the size of the overall settlement. Portions of the Manufacturer settlement may also be distributed in the form of naloxone products;
WHEREAS, settlement payments may only be used for abatement activities specified in the agreement, including, but not limited to, providing funding opioid remediation activities specified in the agreements, including but not limited to providing funding for medication assisted treatment (MAT) education and awareness training to law enforcement and other first responders, community drug disposal programs, training for first responders to participate in prearrest diversion programs, post-overdose response teams, or similar strategies that connect at-risk individuals to behavioral health services and supports, etc. Funds received and not spent in accordance with the agreement may need to be transferred to the State. Additionally, annual reports must be filed with the State regarding the use of the funds; and WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines”), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 5, Packet Page 45 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves participation in the nationwide opioid settlements with Purdue Pharma L.P. and the Sackler family, Alvogen, Amneal, Apotex, Hikma, Indivior, Mylan, Sun, and Zydus, and authorizes the City Manager to execute the participation and subdivision agreements and request direct payments to the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 4., Item Page 6, Packet Page 46 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Rex Van Slyke, Fleet Manager
SUBJECT: Approve the Purchase of One Sewer Jet Truck from Vac-Con, Inc. in the Amount of $492,401.34 (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution approving the
purchase of a sewer jet truck from Vac-Con, Inc. in the amount of $492,401.34.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Protect and preserve our natural environment by
addressing climate change through ecologically
responsible and pragmatic solutions.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The action is consistent with the City policy to replace City vehicles and equipment when they have fulfilled
their useful life cycle and are no longer economical to operate or maintain.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Council approved funding for the replacement of the
sewer jet truck in the FY26 vehicle replacement budget.

Funding is available in Vehicle Replacement Fund 705-
110-1130-3153-4503. The jet truck will be purchased
from Vac-Con, Inc., fulfilled by Municipal Maintenance
Equipment, Inc., “piggybacking” under Sourcewell
Contract number 101221-VAC (Monterey City Code
section 28-14) for $492,401.34 including tax and
delivery. The Finance Department approved this
piggyback purchase July 28, 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Agenda Report Highlights
 Approval recommended for
purchasing a $492,401.34 sewer jet
truck to replace the current aging
unit, funded through the FY26
Vehicle Replacement Budget.
 The sewer jet truck is critical for
daily sewer and storm drain
maintenance, preventing
environmental hazards and
ensuring infrastructure reliability.
 The current truck, with 10 years of
service and high maintenance
costs, has reached the end of its
useful life, necessitating
replacement.
 Delaying the purchase could impact
the City’s ability to respond to
infrastructure failures due to long
lead times in the specialty
equipment industry.
 The new truck’s smaller size
ensures accessibility to spacerestricted areas, vital for maintaining public health and environmental
safety.

Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 5.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 47 №11/25
Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to authorize this purchase; however, this is not recommended. The specialty equipment industry is currently experiencing lead times of eighteen to twenty-four months from purchase order to delivery. The sewer jet truck is a critical asset for the City’s sewer and storm drain maintenance operations. It plays a key role in preventing environmental hazards through daily use. Without approval, delaying a replacement could significantly impact the City’s ability to respond to and prevent potential infrastructure failures.

DISCUSSION:

The sewer jet truck is the Sewer Division’s most heavily utilized asset, operating daily (Monday through Friday) to clean critical sewer and storm drain infrastructure. This routine maintenance is essential for preventing hazardous environmental incidents and maintaining the integrity of the City’s underground systems.

The truck’s smaller size provides access to areas of the City that are inaccessible to larger sewer equipment, making it an indispensable tool for service in space-restricted locations.

Maintaining the operational reliability of this unit is vital to protecting public health and environmental safety.

The current sewer jet truck has been identified for replacement due to its age and service life.

The vehicle is ten years old and has accumulated approximately 6,800 engine hours, equivalent to an estimated 408,000 miles. Lifetime maintenance costs have reached $275,422, with $140,182 of that total incurred over the past four years alone. These rising costs have also resulted in increased downtime, impacting service reliability.

AR/rvs/dt
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Jeff Glass, Streets & Utilities Operations Manager
M.J. Dubois, Vac-Con
James Wheeler, Municipal Maintenance Equipment
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 48 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF ONE SEWER JET TRUCK FROM VAC-CON, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $492,401.34
WHEREAS, the City wishes to enter into a contract with Vac-Con, Inc. under Sourcewell Contract #101221-VAC, utilizing the accepted “piggyback” purchasing process (Monterey City Code 28-14) for the purchase of one Sewer Jet Truck;
WHEREAS, the City evaluated the procurement process utilized by Sourcewell and determined it to be an acceptable “piggyback” purchasing option allowing the City to utilize multi-agency contract pricing. The Finance Department approved the “piggyback” request on July 28, 2025;
WHEREAS, the City has funds appropriated in the FY26 Vehicle Replacement Fund, Account No. 705-110-1130-3153-4503; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby approves the purchase of one Sewer Jet Truck from Vac-Con, Inc. in the amount of $492,401.34.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 5., Item Page 3, Packet Page 49 APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 5., Item Page 4, Packet Page 50 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Levi Hill, AICP, Planning Manager
Prepared By: Fernanda Roveri, AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: City Council Adopt the Historic Preservation Commission Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Amendment to the Mills Act Contract Maintenance Schedule for the Property at 1078 W. Franklin Street (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an amendment to the Mills Act
contract for the property 1078 W. Franklin Street.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Preserve, promote, and maintain our City’s historic and cultural resources through responsible stewardship and
historic preservation that highlights the contributions and perspectives of all people who are a part of Monterey’s diverse history.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

None. There is an existing Mills Act contract for the
property at 1078 W. Franklin Street. The City Council’s action would amend the contract’s maintenance schedule
to reflect repairs and alterations approved by the Historic Preservation Commission and proposed by the property
owner.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: Yes.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31) because the project proposes to amend the
maintenance schedule of a designated historic building.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is
recommended to adopt a
resolution amending the Mills
Act contract for 1078 W.

Franklin Street to update the
maintenance schedule for
historic preservation.
 The William O. Stevens House,
built in 1925, is a historic
Spanish Colonial Revival Style
property requiring remediation
and restoration to maintain its
historic accuracy.
 Proposed amendments include
replacing deteriorated historic
elements, restoring original
features like windows, doors,
and wrought iron railings,
rebuilding the terrace, and
adding a roof canopy to prevent
water damage.
 The Historic Preservation
Commission has approved the
amendments and
recommended City Council
action.

Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 51 №11/25
Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to Class 31 exempt projects.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource. There is no anticipated cumulative effect.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource. There is no anticipated significant effect.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource. Therefore, impacts to scenic highways would not occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The project site is not listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The project would have no impacts related to hazardous waste sites.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource consistent with Secretary of Interior Standards. There would be no adverse impact to historical resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to amend the Mills Act maintenance schedule for 1078 W.

Franklin Street.

DISCUSSION:

Background
The William O. Stevens House at 1078 W. Franklin Street (Figure 1) is an “H-2”-zoned historic resource in the Upper Old Town Neighborhood. It was constructed in the Monterey Heights subdivision in 1925 as part of a residential building boom during the 1920’s. Named after its first owner, the William O. Stevens House was one of the largest and most attractive of the early Spanish Colonial Revival Style residential buildings.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 52 №11/25
Figure 1: Photo of 1078 W. Franklin St.

The City Council approved a Mills Act contract for the property on December 17, 2019.

In 2024, Mr. and Mrs. Rich and Rene Williams bought the subject property and through a property inspection it became apparent that remediation work was needed to several aspects of the building. Subsequently, Mr. Williams applied for a historic permit to replace and reestablish deteriorated historic elements, replace fenestration, rebuild terrace, and add roof canopy. The proposed work exceeded the scope of the maintenance activities established in the property’s Mills Act maintenance schedule in 2019 and associated Historic Preservation Report. The property owners propose to amend the maintenance schedule (Exhibit A to Resolution) to reflect the work and expense required to reestablish the building to its historic accuracy in addition to the work required to preserve original historic features. On December 12, 2024, the Historic Preservation Commission approved the associated historic permit and recommended that the City Council amend the Mills Act maintenance schedule.

Project Description
Mr. Williams hired Mr. Kent Seavey (architectural historian) and Mr. Terry Latasa (architect) to develop a program to rebuild historic elements that have deteriorated beyond repair and reestablish others that have been altered over the years. This program is included as an amendment to the Mills Act maintenance schedule (Exhibit A to Resolution) and includes window, door, and wrought iron railing replacements to return windows and doors back to their original operation and craftmanship and to reveal original wrought iron railing that was stuccoed over; a new roof canopy would shield the French doors that lead out onto the terrace from the rain (currently, rain gets inside the house); and the terrace would be reconstructed as it has severe water damage.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 53 №11/25
Analysis
Monterey City Code requires that property owners under a Mills Act contract follow a detailed maintenance schedule to ensure that the historic resource is preserved. The amended maintenance schedule would capture the work and expense required to reestablish the building to its historic accuracy in addition to the work required to preserve original historic features. All proposed work would be consistent with Secretary of Interior Standards.

In conclusion, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution amending the Mills Act contract for 1078 W. Franklin Street, as recommended by the Historic Preservation Commission.

KC/LH/fr
Attachment: 1. Draft Resolution with Exhibit A
e: Rich and Rene Williams (Property Owner)
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 54 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AMENDING THE MILLS ACT CONTRACT FOR THE PROPERTY AT
1078 W. FRANKLIN STREET
WHEREAS, Rich and Rene Williams, property owners, submitted an application to amend the maintenance schedule associated with the existing Mills Act contract for the William O. Stevens House at 1078 W. Franklin Street;
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the existing Mills Act contract for the property on December 17, 2019;
WHEREAS, the subject property has deteriorated over time, and amending the maintenance schedule would capture the additional work and expense required to reestablish the building to its historic accuracy and include the work required to preserve original historic features;
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2024, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the amended schedule, and, after discussion, voted to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution amending the maintenance schedule;
WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned R-1-6-H2 and its General Plan land use designation is Low Density Residential; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15331, Class 31) because the project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of a designated historic building.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to Class 31 exempt projects.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource. There is no anticipated cumulative effect.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource. There is no anticipated significant effect.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 55 Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource. Therefore, impacts to scenic highways would not occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The project site is not listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The project would have no impacts related to hazardous waste sites.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project proposes to amend the maintenance schedule of an existing historic resource, consistent with Secretary of Interior standards. There would be no adverse impact to historical resources.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute an amendment to Section 6 of the Mills Act contract for 1078 W. Franklin Street, recorded on March 12, 2021, in Document No. 2021018533, with the revised Exhibit (Maintenance Schedule), attached hereto.

The City shall cause the contract amendment to be recorded no later than six (6) months after the parties execute the amendment.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 19th day of August, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 56

EXHIBIT A
Amendment to Mills Act Contract
1078 W Franklin Street, Monterey CA
1 RECORDING REQUEST BY

CITY CLERK

CITY OF MONTEREY

WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO

NAME CITY CLERK

CITY OF MONTEREY

MAILING CITY HALL
ADDRESS MONTEREY, CA 93940

CITY, STATE MONTEREY CA
ZIP CODE 93940
**************************************************************************************

CITY OF MONTEREY

AMENDMENT TO MILLS ACT AGREEMENT

HISTORICAL PROPERTY PRESERVATION CONTRACT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this___ day of_______, 2025 by and between the CITY OF MONTEREY a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and Rich and Rene Williams (hereinafter referred to as “Owner”).

RECITALS
(i) California Government Code section 50280, et seq. (known as the Mills Act) authorizes cities to enter into contracts with the owner of qualified historical properties to provide for their appropriate use, maintenance and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic characteristics;
(ii) The Owner possesses fee title to real property, together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 1078 E. Franklin Street, Monterey, CA 93940. (iii) The City and Owner entered into a Mills Act Agreement Historical Property Preservation Contract (Contract) on December 18, 2019 recorded on March 12, 2021 as reflected in Document No. 2021018533 in the Monterey Conty Recorder’s Office. The land is situated in the State of California, County of Monterey, City of Monterey, and is described as follows:

Lots Twenty-One (21), Twenty-Three (23) and Twenty-Five (25) in Block Ten (10), as shown on “Map of Monterey Heights, Monterey, Monterey County, Cal., the property of Henderson Realty Company, as surveyed by Little, C.E., March 1906”, filed for record April 18, 1906, in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of Monterey, State of California, in Volume 1 of Maps, “Cities and Towns” at Page 68.

Assessor’s Parcel Number: 001-243-10
(iv) City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to amend Exhibit 2 to Section 6, Preservation of Property, of the Contract.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 7, Packet Page 57

EXHIBIT A
Amendment to Mills Act Contract
1078 W Franklin Street, Monterey CA
2 NOW, THEREFORE, City and Owner, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein, do hereby agree as follows:

Exhibit 2 to Section 6, Preservation of Property, of the Contract is hereby amended by replacing it with the attached Exhibit 2. All other terms of the Contract remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the City and Owner have executed this Agreement on the day and year written above.

CITY OF MONTEREY:

By: ______________________________
Print Name: ___________________________
Title: City Manager
PROPERTY OWNER:

By: ________________________________
Print Name: ____________________________
Name: Rich Williams
PROPERTY OWNER:

By: ________________________________
Print Name: ____________________________
Name: Rene Williams
[Above signatures must be notarized]
State of California
County of Monterey
}
On ______________________________ before me, ________________________________________________________________ Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
Personally appeared __________________________________________________________________________________________ Name(s) of Signer(s)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________________________ Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 8, Packet Page 58

EXHIBIT A
Amendment to Mills Act Contract
1078 W Franklin Street, Monterey CA
3 On ______________________________ before me, ________________________________________________________________ Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
Personally appeared __________________________________________________________________________________________ Name(s) of Signer(s)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________________________ Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public
State of California
County of Monterey
}
On ______________________________ before me, ________________________________________________________________ Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer
Personally appeared __________________________________________________________________________________________ Name(s) of Signer(s)
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _________________________________________________ Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public
State of California
County of Monterey
}
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 9, Packet Page 59

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 10, Packet Page 60 Proposed Initiatives to Exterior - Amendment to Mills Act Maintenance Schedule for 1078 W. Franklin Street, Monterey - 31 OCTOBER, 2024 Item 1: Rebuild the east side terrace/patio to its historically correct configuration with wrought iron guardrails and stair balusters, eliminating the previously added stucco guardrail wall enclosing the terrace as well as rebuilding existing stairs. The original dilapidated staircase is still present in the subarea, as are its riser and tread outlines in the exterior stucco wall enclosing the stairway. We desire to extend the new terrace/patio four feet to accommodate new stairs.

Valuation of materials: $9,000. Valuation for labor $10,000. = Total $19,000.

Expected completion of item 1: By December 31, 2025
Item 2: Remove stucco wall and re-establish previous wrought iron safety rail at east side entrance to laundry room. Wrought iron details will be replicated to be consistent with other original wrought iron exterior installations present at the residence.

Valuation of materials: $2,500 Valuation for labor $1,000 = Total $3,500.

Expected completion of item 2: By December 31, 2025
Item 3: Remove walls that enclosed the previous covered porch section of the terrace/patio.

Frame and finish two stucco arches on said walls to reflect the original exterior aesthetic of the residence.

Valuation of materials: $2,000. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $3,000.

Expected completion of item 3: By December 31, 2025
Item 4: Construct a new roof canopy over the French door leading to the uncovered portion of the terrace/patio on the east side of the residence. Roof canopy to be architectural and aesthetically consistent with original existing roof canopy at west side entrance to laundry room.

Valuation of materials: $1,500. Valuation for labor $2,000. = Total $3,500.

Expected completion of item 4: By December 31, 2025

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 11, Packet Page 61 Proposed Window & Door Initiatives - Amendment to Mills Act Maintenance Schedule -1078 W. Franklin Street, Monterey - 31 OCTOBER, 2024 Item 1: Rebuild and replace existing deteriorated out-swing east facing French doors leading to the terrace/patio with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ French door 5-Lite 5'-0" X 6’-8" Valuation of materials: $2,826. Valuation for labor $1,500. = Total $4,326.

Expected completion of item 1: By December 31, 2025
Item 2: Re-establish living room north facing French XO out-swing casement window adjacent to covered terrace patio section with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ window - 4-Lite 4'-2" X 5’-4" Valuation of materials: $1,662. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $2,662.

Expected completion of item 2: By December 31, 2025
Item 3: Replace existing bedroom #3 east facing fixed glass window (not original) with French XOX out-swing casement window with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ window - 4-Lite 6'-2" X 4’-0"
Valuation of materials: $2,431. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $3,431.

Expected completion of item 3: By December 31, 2025
Note: The following five (5) windows are all within the primary bedroom. Two (2) of the 3'-8" X 4’-6” windows below may not need to be ordered and replaced. It will depend on the condition of the two (2) existing windows that are entombed/enclosed within the west facing wall once demoed.

Item 4: Replace existing primary bedroom east facing fixed glass window (not original) with French out-swing dbl. casement window with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ window - 3-Lite 3'-8" X 4’-6"
Valuation of materials: $1,776. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $2,776.

Expected completion of item 4: By December 31, 2025
Item 5: Replace existing primary bedroom east facing fixed glass window (not original) with French out-swing dbl. casement window with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ window - 3-Lite 3'-8" X 4’-6"
Valuation of materials: $1,776. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $2,776.

Expected completion of item 5: By December 31, 2025
Item 6: Replace existing primary bedroom west facing fixed glass window (not original) with French out-swing dbl. casement window with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ window - 3-Lite 3'-8" X 4’-6"
Valuation of materials: $1,776. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $2,776.

Expected completion of item 6: By December 31, 2025

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 12, Packet Page 62 Proposed Window & Door Initiatives - Amendment to Mills Act Maintenance Schedule -1078 W. Franklin Street, Monterey - 31 OCTOBER, 2024 Item 7: Replace existing primary bedroom west facing fixed glass window (not original) with French out-swing dbl. casement window with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ window - 3-Lite 3'-8" X 4’-6"
Valuation of materials: $1,776. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $2,776.

Expected completion of item 7: By December 31, 2025
Item 8: Install in primary bedroom north facing fixed glass window with newly constructed ‘like-kind’ window - 6'-0" X 1’-8"
Valuation of materials: $1,231. Valuation for labor $1,000. = Total $2,231.

Expected completion of item 8: By December 31, 2025
Item 9: Rehabilitate thirty-six (36) existing windows and nine (9) wood doors. Rehabilitation will involve, where needed, the use of epoxy wood fillers, repair of wood rails and muntins, reglazing and re-puttying the original glazing as well as the priming and painting of said sashes and frames.

Valuation of materials & labor: $1,500. (valuation already in Mills Act maintenance Schedule) Expected completion of item 9: By December 31, 2025

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 6., Item Page 13, Packet Page 63 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Brette Neal, Human Resources Director
Prepared By: Gina Russo, Assistant Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Amend and Restate Resolution 25-058, the FY 25/26 Position Control List, to Delete a Deputy City Attorney Classification and Add a New Deputy City Attorney I/II Classification and Amend and Restate Resolution 25-059, the FY 25/26 Salary Schedule, to Establish the Salary (Not A Project Under CEQA, Per Article 20, Section 15378 And Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt a resolution to amend and
restate Resolution 25-058, the 2025-26 Position Control List, by deleting the Deputy City Attorney classification and adding a Deputy City Attorney I/II classification and to amend and restate Resolution 25-059, the FY 25/26
Salary Schedule, to establish the salary.

VALUE DRIVERS:

The proposed recommendation is consistent with the
City Council’s vision to “provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high-quality city workforce”.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City conducts periodic reviews of job descriptions to ensure accurate classification and that both the
responsibilities and corresponding salary align with the work being performed

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed
action is not a project as defined by the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is recommended to
replace the Deputy City Attorney
classification with a new dual-level
Deputy City Attorney I/II classification
to address recruitment challenges.
 The Deputy City Attorney position has
been vacant since its establishment in
2017 despite multiple recruitment
efforts, prompting the need for this
change.
 The new classification structure aims
to attract a broader range of qualified
candidates by offering flexibility to hire
at either level based on applicant
qualifications and experience.
 The salary range for Deputy City
Attorney I is set at 5% below the
bottom step of Deputy City Attorney II,
ensuring a clear progression between
the two levels.
 Maintaining the status quo is not
recommended, as the new
classification is expected to improve
the likelihood of filling this critical role.

Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 64 №11/25
Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

One alternative is to maintain the status quo; however, this is not recommended. The Deputy City Attorney position has been difficult to fill, and creating a new classification presents an opportunity to successfully address the vacancy
DISCUSSION:

The Deputy City Attorney position was originally established in 2017 to support the growing legal needs of the City. Despite multiple recruitment efforts over the past several years, we have been unsuccessful in filling the role. In response, we have made several attempts to revise the job description and adjust the salary range to attract qualified candidates. Unfortunately, these efforts have not yielded the desired results, and the position remains vacant.

To address this ongoing challenge, we are proposing the creation of a Deputy City Attorney I/II classification. This dual-level structure will provide the flexibility to recruit and hire at either level, depending on the qualifications and experience of the applicant pool. By broadening the scope of the position, we aim to increase the likelihood of attracting a wider range of talented legal professionals and ultimately filling this critical role within the City Attorney’s Office.

The salary range for the Deputy City Attorney II level will be what is currently stated in the salary schedule as the Deputy City Attorney position. The newly established Deputy City Attorney I will have a top step that is set at 5% below the bottom step of the Deputy City Attorney II range, ensuring a clear and consistent progression between the two classifications.

Semi-Monthly Deputy City Attorney I Deputy City Attorney II Step 1 $5330 $6803
Step 2 $5597 $7143
Step 3 $5877 $7501
Step 4 $6171 $7875
Step 5 $6479 $8269
BN/gr
Attachments: 1. Resolution with:

Exhibit A - Position Control List
Exhibit B - Salary Schedule

2. Deputy City Attorney I/II Class Specification
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 65 №11/25
e: Christine Davi, City Attorney
Rafaela King, Finance Director
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 66 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION 25-058, THE FY 25/26 POSITION CONTROL

LIST, TO DELETE A DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY CLASSIFICATION AND ADD A NEW

DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY I/II CLASSIFICATION,
AND AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION 25-059, THE FY 25/26 SALARY

SCHEDULE, TO ESTABLISH THE SALARY
WHEREAS, the City adopted the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Operating Budget with the passage of Resolution 25-058. The Operating Budget contains a Position Control List (Exhibit B to Resolution 25-058). The City would be better served by amending and restating Exhibit B to Resolution 25-058, by adding a new Deputy City Attorney I/II classification in the City Attorney’s Office;
WHEREAS, the City would be better served by amending and restating Resolution 25- 059, the adopted Full-time Salary Schedule, to include the newly established salary for the Deputy City Attorney I/II classification;
WHEREAS, the proposed position control list is amended as follows:

Department Adopted Amended
City Attorney Department
Deputy City Attorney 1 0
Deputy City Attorney I/II 0 1
WHEREAS, the proposed salary schedule is amended to delete the Deputy City Attorney position and add the following positions:

Deputy City Attorney I
Semi Monthly Salary: Step 1: $5,330
Step 2: $5,597
Step 3: $5,877
Step 4: $6,171
Step 5: $6,479
Deputy City Attorney II
Semi Monthly Salary: Step 1: $6,803
Step 2: $7,143
Step 3: $7,501
Step 4: $7,875
Step 5: $8,269
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 4, Packet Page 67 the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability. and;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby amends and restates Exhibit B to Resolution 25-058, the Position Control List for the City of Monterey Budget for fiscal year 25/26, as set forth in Exhibit A to this resolution, to delete a Deputy City Attorney classification and replace it with a Deputy City Attorney I/II classification.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ALSO FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby amends and restates Resolution 25-059, the Adopted Salary Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit B, to provide for the salaries for the Deputy City Attorney I and Deputy City Attorney II positions.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 5, Packet Page 68 CITY MANAGER DEPARTMENT Administration
Community
Resources/
Education City Clerk Total Allocation
Fund 101 0210 0211 0321

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 2.00

0.83 0.83

1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total City Manager Dept 3.83 1.00 2.00 6.83
Conference Center Administration Sales
Event
Operations Maintenance Total Allocation
Fund 101 6210 6220 6231 6232
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Custodian 1.75 1.75

1.00 1.00
Event Coordinator 2.00 2.00

2.50 2.50
Operations Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Senior Facility Attendant 1.00 1.00
Senior Craftsworker 1.00 1.00
HVAC Senior Tech 1.00 1.00
Total Conference Center 2.00 1.00 9.25 2.00 14.25

INFORMATION RESOURCES

DEPARTMENT
Information
Resources Total Allocation
Fund 710 0340

1.00 1.00

0.17 0.17

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Senior Information Tech Specialist 1.00 1.00
IT Application Engineer II 4.00 4.00

1.00 1.00
Administrative Assistant 0.75 0.75
Total Information Services Dept 11.92 11.92

CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT
City Attorney
Administration Total Allocation
Fund 101 0500

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total City Attorney Dept 4.00 4.00
HUMAN RESOURCES Administration (1)
Workers'
Comp/
Employee
Benefits(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/715(2) 0600 0612

1.00 1.00 2.00
Senior Human Resource Analyst 1.00 1.00
Human Resources Assistant 1.00 1.00
Assistant HR Director 0.50 0.50 1.00

0.75 0.25 1.00
Human Resources Specialist 2.00 2.00
Total Human Resources Dept 6.25 1.75 8.00
City Clerk
Conference Center General Mgr
Sales Coordinator
Facility Attendant
Operations Supervisor
Chief Information Officer

AMENDED POSITION CONTROL LIST
FISCAL YEAR 2025-26
Communications Manager
Administrative Assistant
Assistant City Manager
City Manager
City Attorney
Deputy City Attorney 1 | 2
Legal Secretary
Human Resources Analyst
Human Resources Director
Assistant City Manager
GEO Info System (GIS) Coordinator
Network Engineer II
Information Technology Specialist
Systems & Network Administrator
Assistant City Attorney

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 6, Packet Page 69 FINANCE DEPARTMENT Finance (1) Revenue Accounting Revenue(2) Risk
Management (3) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/807(2)/716(3) 1110 1120 1130 1120 1143

1.00 3.50 4.50
Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.70 2.00 0.30 4.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Business License Inspector 1.00 1.00

0.00 1.00 1.00

0.75 0.25 1.00
Finance Manager 1.00 1.00 2.00
Purchasing Analyst 1.00 1.00
Risk Specialist 1.00 1.00
Risk Manager 1.00 1.00
Total Finance Dept 1.75 5.70 9.50 0.30 2.25 19.50
POLICE DEPARTMENT Administration
Field
Operations Support
Investigations/
Community
Services Total Allocation
Fund 101 2110 2120 2130 2140
Assistant Police Chief 1.00 1.00
Homeless Navigator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Police Officer 34.00 5.00 39.00

7.00 2.00 9.00

2.00 1.00 3.00
Community Service Officer 2.00 2.00

1.00 2.00 3.00
Police Services Technician 8.00 8.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00
Total Police Dept 5.00 45.00 14.00 8.00 72.00
FIRE DEPARTMENT Administration
Fire Prevention
& Emerg.

Preparedness Fire Operations Fire Training Total Allocation Fund 101 2510 2520 2530 2540

2.00 2.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Fire Inspector II 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00 4.00
Fire Captain 21.00 21.00

24.00 24.00

39.00 39.00

1.00 1.00
Total Fire Dept 6.00 2.00 87.00 1.00 96.00
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Administration(1)
Neighborhood
Improvement
Fund Admin(2)
Presidio Maint.

Admin(3) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/216(2)/650(3) 3110 3110 3110

1.00 1.00
Accounting Assistant 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst 1.00 1.00

0.50 0.10 0.60

0.10 0.10
Senior Engineer 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Administration 4.50 1.00 2.20 7.70
Accountant/Auditor
Police Lieutenant
Police Services Assistant
Police Records/Detention Superviso
Senior Administrative Analyst
Senior Police Services Technician
Assistant Fire Chief
Accounting Specialist
Assistant Finance Director
Finance Analyst
Finance Director
Police Chief
Police Sergeant
Senior Adminstrative Analyst
Accounting Specialist
Deputy PW Director/Admin
Executive Assistant
Senior Administrative Analyst
Public Works Director
Fire Chief
Fire Prevention Technician
Deputy Fire Marshal
Division Chief
Fire Engineer
Firefighter
Deputy PW Director/Engineer

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 7, Packet Page 70 Engineering Engineering(1)
Sewer Line
MaintenanceEngineering(2)Storm Drain
Engineering(3)
Presidio Proj
Engineering &
Admin(4) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/279(2)/280(3)/650(4) 3121 3121 3121 3159

2.00 2.00

2.85 0.15 2.00 5.00

1.00 1.00

0.50 0.20 0.20 0.90

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Engineering Project Manager 2.00 1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.40 0.30 0.30 3.00
Senior Project Manager 1.00 1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.42 0.58 2.00

0.14 0.86 1.00
Total Engineering 17.75 1.21 1.94 4.00 24.90
Vehicle Management -Mechanical Mechanical Total Allocation Fund 708 3154

5.00 5.00
Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Vehicle Mgmt.-Mechanical 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.00 Building Maintenance
Building
Maintenance(1)
Presidio Maint.

Bldgs(2)
Presidio Camp
Roberts(2)
Presidio Naval
Research(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2) 3152 3152 3163 3164

1.00 13.00 1.00 1.00 16.00

1.00 3.00 4.00

0.15 0.85 1.00

0.25 0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

4.00 1.00 5.00

1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00
General Srvc Field Oper Manager 0.25 0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 5.00 6.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Building Maintenance 5.65 37.35 5.00 2.00 50.00
Streets/Sewer/Stormdrain
Maintenance Maintenance(1)
Presidio Maint.

Streets(2)
Sewer
Maintenance(3)
Storm Drain
Maintenance(4)
Presidio Maint.

Streets(2) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2)/279(3)/280(4) 3151 3151 3153 3155 3155

0.30 0.20 0.30 0.20 1.00

0.49 0.40 0.11 1.00

1.00 2.00 1.00 4.00

1.00 1.00

0.74 1.00 0.13 0.13 2.00

2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 6.00

1.00 1.00 2.00
Total Streets 6.53 2.20 5.83 2.31 17.00
Custodial Services Custodial Total Allocation
Fund 101 3172

7.00 7.00
Lead Custodian 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Engineering Programs Analyst
Public Works Inspector
Senior Engineer
Senior Public Works Inspector
Environmental Reg. Analyst
Environmental Reg. Manager
Administrative Assistant
Associate Civil Engineer
City Traffic Engineer
Deputy PW Director/City Engineer
Engineering Assistant II
Engineering Technician
General Srvc Superintendent
Admin Services Technician
Management Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Building Maintenance Supervisor
Building Maintenance Worker
Automotive Mechanic
Parts Clerk
Fleet Manager
Lead Mechanic
Building Maintenance Craftsworker
Electrician
Streets & Utilities Operations Manag
Administrative Assistant
Senior Street Maintenance Worker
Sign Craftsworker
Street Maintenance Leadworker
Street Maintenance Worker
Facilities Maintenance Coordinator
Historic Facilities Sr. Craftsworker
HVAC Senior Technician
Senior Craftsworker
Senior Locksmith
Senior Parts Clerk
Street & Utilities Supervisor
Custodian
Senior Custodian

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 8, Packet Page 71 Total Custodial Services 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 Marina/Harbor Administration(1) Maintenance(1) Security(1) Administration(2) Maintenance(2) Security(2) Total Allocation Fund 600(1)/807(2) 3310 3320 3330 3410 3420/3440 3430

0.50 0.50 1.00
Harbor Coordinator 1.00 1.00 2.00

1.50 1.50

0.10 0.10 0.20

0.80 0.20 1.00

1.50 1.50 3.00

2.77 0.98 3.75
Total Marina/Harbor 2.40 1.50 2.77 1.80 3.00 0.98 12.45 Parking Administration Enforcement Maintenance Parking Services Total Allocation Fund 625 3510 3520 3530 3540

2.75 2.75

1.00 1.00

0.75 0.75
Assistant Parking Superintendent 1.00 1.00

0.20 0.20

1.00 1.00

8.00 8.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

4.00 4.00

0.50 0.50 1.00

4.50 4.50

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Parking 7.20 10.00 9.00 6.00 32.20
Community Development Department Planning
Building Safety
& Inspection Total Allocation
Fund 101 4400 4410

2.00 1.75 3.75
Accountant/Auditor 0.50 0.50
Assistant Planner 1.00 1.00

0.60 0.60
Economic Development Manager 1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

3.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Planning Manager 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Community Development 14.10 6.75 20.85
Housing & Property Management Property Mgmt(1)
Property
Mgmt(2)
Housing
Admin(1) Housing Admin(3)
Housing
Admin(4)
Housing
Projects(4) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/807(2)/268(3)/270(4)/274(5) 4300 4300 4305 4305 4305 4310

0.15 0.85 0.50 0.25 0.25 2.00

0.10 0.30 0.40

3.00 3.00
Housing Manager 1.00 1.00
Property Technician 1.00 1.00

0.15 0.85 1.00
Total Housing & Property Mgmt 1.40 2.00 4.50 0.00 0.25 0.25 8.40 Marina Harbor Assistant
Harbor Maintenance Craftsworker
Harbor Security Worker
Accounting Assistant
Accounting Specialist
Administrative Assistant
Harbormaster
Facility Attendant (RPT)
Deputy PW Director/Admin
Parking Maintenance Supervisor
Parking Maintenance Leadworker
Parking Maintenance Worker
Parking Services Coordinator
Parking Services Representative
Parking Services Specialist
Deputy PW Director/Admin
Parking Superintendent
Parking Enforcement Officer
Parking Enforcement Supervisor
Senior Parking Enforcement Off.

Parking Controls Technician
Sustainability Manager
Sustainability Assistant
Plans Examiner
Building Technician
Chief Of Inspct Srvc/Bldg Off.

Senior Building Inspector
Senior Parking Controls Technician
Administrative Assistant
Community Development Director
Principal Planner
Senior Associate Planner
Code Compliance Coordinator
Inspector
Administrative Assistant
Community Development Director
HCD Coordinator - Projects/Prgm.

Property Manager

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 9, Packet Page 72 Parks & Recreation Department Administration Total Allocation Recreation
Fund 101 5110

1.00 1.00
Management Analyst I 0.34 0.34

0.34 0.34

1.00 1.00
Recreation Supervisor 1.00 1.00
Total Recreation 3.68 3.68
Recreation Centers
El Estero Park
Center
Scholze Park
Center
Hilltop Park
Center
Special Programs
& Events Sports Total Allocation
Fund 101 5121 5122 5124 5130 5160

1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00
Sports Coordinator 1.00 1.00
Lead Preschool Instructor 0.75 0.75

0.50 1.00 0.50 2.00
Total Centers 1.50 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.50 6.75
Monterey Sports Center Operations Maintenance Total Allocation Fund 101 5180 5189

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Fitness Supervisor 1.00 1.00
Guest Service Specialist 1.00 1.00
Management Analyst I 0.33 0.33

0.33 0.33

1.00 1.00
Sports Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Sports Center 8.66 2.00 10.66
Parks Maintenance(1)
Presidio
Maintenance(2)
Street
Maintenance
District(3)
Vets Park / Urban
Forestry(1) Cemetery (4) Parking (5) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/650(2)261-262(3)610(4)625(5) 5210 3210 5210 5220/5230 5240 5210

0.70 0.25 0.05 1.00
Management Analyst I 0.33 0.33

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Park Maintenance Leadworker 2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00
Park Maintenance Worker 10.10 0.40 0.50 1.00 12.00

0.80 0.03 0.15 0.02 1.00

0.33 0.33

2.00 2.00

0.50 1.50 2.00
Greenbelt Coordinator 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Total Parks 18.26 0.53 0.40 3.90 2.57 1.00 26.66
Museum Administration Total Allocation
Fund 101 5610
Artifact Specialist 1.00 1.00

0.25 0.25
Total Museum 1.25 1.25
LIBRARY Administration (1)
Reference
Services (1) Total Allocation
Fund 101(1)/810(2) 5510 5530

0.75 0.75
Assistant Library Director 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Parks & Rec Director
Recreation Manager
Recreation Coordinator
Recreation Specialist
Administrative Assistant
Aquatics Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Assistant Urban Forester
Cemetery Coordinator
Cemetery Maintenance Worker
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Assistant
Library Director
Park Attendant
Park Maintenance Craftsworker
Park Maintenance Supervisor
Park Operations Manager
Parks & Rec Director
Senior Park Maintenance Worker
Facility Coordinator
Parks & Rec Director
Sports Center Manager
Building Maintenance Craftsworker
Senior Craftsworker
Admin Services Technician

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 10, Packet Page 73

0.75 0.75

4.50 4.50

1.00 1.00

4.00 4.00

1.00 1.00
Total Library 2.75 11.25 14.00
GRAND TOTAL 155.38 133.24 155.14 32.31 9.57 2.23 488.00 Library Assistant I
Library Assistant II
Technology Services Mgr
Librarian
Library Manager

EXHIBIT A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 11, Packet Page 74 City of Monterey
Full-Time Salary Schedule, Regular
Part-Time, and
Part-Time Hourly Schedule
FY 25/26
Effective: 07-01-25 to 06-30-26

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 12, Packet Page 75 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3310 ACCOUNTANT/AUDITOR ft gem Step: 1076 4,043.00 97,032.00 076 3310 ft gem Step: 2076 4,245.00 101,880.00
3310 ft gem Step: 3076 4,460.00 107,040.00
3310 ft gem Step: 4076 4,680.00 112,320.00
3310 ft gem Step: 5076 4,913.00 117,912.00
3313 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1268 2,624.00 62,976.00 268 3313 ft gem Step: 2268 2,755.00 66,120.00
3313 ft gem Step: 3268 2,893.00 69,432.00
3313 ft gem Step: 4268 3,038.00 72,912.00
3313 ft gem Step: 5268 3,192.00 76,608.00
3320 ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1285 3,139.00 75,336.00 285 3320 ft gem Step: 2285 3,294.00 79,056.00
3320 ft gem Step: 3285 3,456.00 82,944.00
3320 ft gem Step: 4285 3,631.00 87,144.00
3320 ft gem Step: 5285 3,813.00 91,512.00
1203 ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1015 4,088.00 98,112.00 015 1203 ft mea Step: 2015 4,295.00 103,080.00
1203 ft mea Step: 3015 4,508.00 108,192.00
1203 ft mea Step: 4015 4,734.00 113,616.00
1203 ft mea Step: 5015 4,971.00 119,304.00
3307 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1373 2,380.00 57,120.00 373 3307 ft gem Step: 2373 2,499.00 59,976.00
3307 ft gem Step: 3373 2,624.00 62,976.00
3307 ft gem Step: 4373 2,755.00 66,120.00
3307 ft gem Step: 5373 2,893.00 69,432.00
3307 ft gem Step: 6373 3,038.00 72,912.00
3307 ft gem Step: 7373 3,192.00 76,608.00
6112 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TECH ft gem Step: 1731 3,129.00 75,096.00 731 6112 ft gem Step: 2731 3,287.00 78,888.00
6112 ft gem Step: 3731 3,449.00 82,776.00
6112 ft gem Step: 4731 3,622.00 86,928.00
6112 ft gem Step: 5731 3,805.00 91,320.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 1 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 13, Packet Page 76 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5303 AQUATICS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1114 3,482.00 83,568.00 114 5303 pt gem Step: 2114 3,656.00 87,744.00
5303 pt gem Step: 3114 3,840.00 92,160.00
5303 pt gem Step: 4114 4,031.00 96,744.00
5303 pt gem Step: 5114 4,233.00 101,592.00
5301 AQUATICS SPECIALIST II pt gem Step: 1302 2,271.00 54,504.00 302 5301 pt gem Step: 2302 2,384.00 57,216.00
5301 pt gem Step: 3302 2,503.00 60,072.00
5301 pt gem Step: 4302 2,627.00 63,048.00
5301 pt gem Step: 5302 2,758.00 66,192.00
5107 ARTIFACT SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1107 2,556.00 61,344.00 107 5107 ft gem Step: 2107 2,684.00 64,416.00
5107 ft gem Step: 3107 2,818.00 67,632.00
5107 ft gem Step: 4107 2,960.00 71,040.00
5107 ft gem Step: 5107 3,108.00 74,592.00
1207 ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY pt mea Step: 1200 8,055.00 193,320.00 200 1207 pt mea Step: 2200 8,480.00 203,520.00
1207 pt mea Step: 3200 8,926.00 214,224.00
1207 pt mea Step: 4200 9,396.00 225,504.00
1207 pt mea Step: 5200 9,890.00 237,360.00
1122 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER ft exec Step: 1010 8,902.00 213,648.00 010 1122 ft exec Step: 2010 9,348.00 224,352.00
1122 ft exec Step: 3010 9,815.00 235,560.00
1122 ft exec Step: 4010 10,306.00 247,344.00
1122 ft exec Step: 5010 10,821.00 259,704.00
1264 ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1263 6,853.00 164,472.00 263 1264 ft mea Step: 2263 7,196.00 172,704.00
1264 ft mea Step: 3263 7,556.00 181,344.00
1264 ft mea Step: 4263 7,933.00 190,392.00
1264 ft mea Step: 5263 8,331.00 199,944.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 2 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 14, Packet Page 77 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2205 ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF ft fma Step: 1325 8,589.00 206,136.00 325 2205 ft fma Step: 2325 9,014.00 216,336.00
2205 ft fma Step: 3325 9,468.00 227,232.00
2205 ft fma Step: 4325 9,942.00 238,608.00
2205 ft fma Step: 5325 10,437.00 250,488.00
1298 ASSISTANT HR DIRECTOR ft mea Step: 1370 6,761.00 162,264.00 370 1298 ft mea Step: 2370 7,100.00 170,400.00
1298 ft mea Step: 3370 7,456.00 178,944.00
1298 ft mea Step: 4370 7,828.00 187,872.00
1298 ft mea Step: 5370 8,220.00 197,280.00
1205 ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR pt mea Step: 1016 5,664.00 135,936.00 016 1205 pt mea Step: 2016 5,947.00 142,728.00
1205 pt mea Step: 3016 6,244.00 149,856.00
1205 pt mea Step: 4016 6,556.00 157,344.00
1205 pt mea Step: 5016 6,884.00 165,216.00
3309 ASSISTANT PLANNER ft gem Step: 1180 3,234.00 77,616.00 180 3309 ft gem Step: 2180 3,396.00 81,504.00
3309 ft gem Step: 3180 3,565.00 85,560.00
3309 ft gem Step: 4180 3,743.00 89,832.00
3309 ft gem Step: 5180 3,930.00 94,320.00
6724 ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF ft plma Step: 1340 8,536.00 204,864.00 340 6724 ft plma Step: 2340 8,961.00 215,064.00
6724 ft plma Step: 3340 9,411.00 225,864.00
6724 ft plma Step: 4340 9,881.00 237,144.00
6724 ft plma Step: 5340 10,376.00 249,024.00
6722 ASSISTANT URBAN FORESTER pt gem Step: 1320 3,660.00 87,840.00 320 6722 pt gem Step: 2320 3,843.00 92,232.00
6722 pt gem Step: 3320 4,036.00 96,864.00
6722 pt gem Step: 4320 4,237.00 101,688.00
6722 pt gem Step: 5320 4,451.00 106,824.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 3 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 15, Packet Page 78 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1208 ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1018 5,046.00 121,104.00 018 1208 ft mea Step: 2018 5,297.00 127,128.00
1208 ft mea Step: 3018 5,563.00 133,512.00
1208 ft mea Step: 4018 5,839.00 140,136.00
1208 ft mea Step: 5018 6,485.00 155,640.00
4202 ASSOCIATE PLANNER ft gem Step: 1097 4,132.00 99,168.00 097 4202 ft gem Step: 2097 4,340.00 104,160.00
4202 ft gem Step: 3097 4,557.00 109,368.00
4202 ft gem Step: 4097 4,785.00 114,840.00
4202 ft gem Step: 5097 5,026.00 120,624.00
1290 ASST DIR OF INFO RESOURCES ft mea Step: 1357 6,415.00 153,960.00 357 1290 ft mea Step: 2357 6,736.00 161,664.00
1290 ft mea Step: 3357 7,074.00 169,776.00
1290 ft mea Step: 4357 7,428.00 178,272.00
1290 ft mea Step: 5357 7,799.00 187,176.00
1226 ASST PARKING SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1237 4,646.00 111,504.00 237 1226 ft mea Step: 2237 4,877.00 117,048.00
1226 ft mea Step: 3237 5,121.00 122,904.00
1226 ft mea Step: 4237 5,377.00 129,048.00
1226 ft mea Step: 5237 5,646.00 135,504.00
6301 AUTOMOTIVE MECHANIC rpt gem Step: 1132 3,241.00 77,784.00 132 6301 rpt gem Step: 2132 3,401.00 81,624.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 3132 3,577.00 85,848.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 4132 3,751.00 90,024.00
6301 rpt gem Step: 5132 3,941.00 94,584.00
6501 BUILDING MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1135 3,030.00 72,720.00 135 6501 ft gem Step: 2135 3,180.00 76,320.00
6501 ft gem Step: 3135 3,344.00 80,256.00
6501 ft gem Step: 4135 3,504.00 84,096.00
6501 ft gem Step: 5135 3,680.00 88,320.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 4 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 16, Packet Page 79 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6502 BUILDING MAINT. SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1136 3,856.00 92,544.00 136 6502 ft gem Step: 2136 4,051.00 97,224.00
6502 ft gem Step: 3136 4,254.00 102,096.00
6502 ft gem Step: 4136 4,465.00 107,160.00
6502 ft gem Step: 5136 4,688.00 112,512.00
6503 BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1137 2,318.00 55,632.00 137 6503 ft gem Step: 2137 2,434.00 58,416.00
6503 ft gem Step: 3137 2,555.00 61,320.00
6503 ft gem Step: 4137 2,683.00 64,392.00
6503 ft gem Step: 5137 2,817.00 67,608.00
6503 ft gem Step: 6137 2,957.00 70,968.00
6503 ft gem Step: 7137 3,105.00 74,520.00
4306 BUILDING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1196 3,667.00 88,008.00 196 4306 ft gem Step: 2196 3,850.00 92,400.00
4306 ft gem Step: 3196 4,046.00 97,104.00
4306 ft gem Step: 4196 4,246.00 101,904.00
4306 ft gem Step: 5196 4,462.00 107,088.00
3334 BUSINESS LICENSE INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1247 3,401.00 81,624.00 247 3334 ft gem Step: 2247 3,577.00 85,848.00
3334 ft gem Step: 3247 3,751.00 90,024.00
3334 ft gem Step: 4247 3,941.00 94,584.00
3334 ft gem Step: 5247 4,134.00 99,216.00
6702 CEMETERY COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1157 3,482.00 83,568.00 157 6702 ft gem Step: 2157 3,656.00 87,744.00
6702 ft gem Step: 3157 3,840.00 92,160.00
6702 ft gem Step: 4157 4,031.00 96,744.00
6702 ft gem Step: 5157 4,233.00 101,592.00
6710 CEMETERY MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1165 2,687.00 64,488.00 165 6710 ft gem Step: 2165 2,824.00 67,776.00
6710 ft gem Step: 3165 2,966.00 71,184.00
6710 ft gem Step: 4165 3,113.00 74,712.00
6710 ft gem Step: 5165 3,268.00 78,432.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 5 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 17, Packet Page 80 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1300 CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ft mea Step: 1011 7,320.00 175,680.00 011 1300 ft mea Step: 2011 7,686.00 184,464.00
1300 ft mea Step: 3011 8,069.00 193,656.00
1300 ft mea Step: 4011 8,473.00 203,352.00
1300 ft mea Step: 5011 8,896.00 213,504.00
1270 CHIEF OF INSPCT SRVC/BLDG OFF. ft mea Step: 1311 6,842.00 164,208.00 311 1270 ft mea Step: 2311 7,181.00 172,344.00
1270 ft mea Step: 3311 7,545.00 181,080.00
1270 ft mea Step: 4311 7,921.00 190,104.00
1270 ft mea Step: 5311 8,316.00 199,584.00
1104 CITY ATTORNEY pt exec Step: 5002 11,739.00 281,736.00 002 1221 CITY CLERK ft mea Step: 1031 5,291.00 126,984.00 031 1221 ft mea Step: 2031 5,620.00 134,880.00
1221 ft mea Step: 3031 5,952.00 142,848.00
1221 ft mea Step: 4031 6,281.00 150,744.00
1221 ft mea Step: 5031 6,612.00 158,688.00
1101 CITY MANAGER ft exec Step: 5001 12,685.00 304,440.00 001 1254 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER pt mea Step: 1050 6,415.00 153,960.00 050 1254 pt mea Step: 2050 6,736.00 161,664.00
1254 pt mea Step: 3050 7,074.00 169,776.00
1254 pt mea Step: 4050 7,428.00 178,272.00
1254 pt mea Step: 5050 7,799.00 187,176.00
4308 CODE COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1326 4,033.00 96,792.00 326 4308 ft gem Step: 2326 4,236.00 101,664.00
4308 ft gem Step: 3326 4,448.00 106,752.00
4308 ft gem Step: 4326 4,670.00 112,080.00
4308 ft gem Step: 5326 4,905.00 117,720.00
1299 COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1048 4,659.00 111,816.00 048 1299 ft mea Step: 2048 4,892.00 117,408.00
1299 ft mea Step: 3048 5,137.00 123,288.00
1299 ft mea Step: 4048 5,395.00 129,480.00
1299 ft mea Step: 5048 5,665.00 135,960.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 6 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 18, Packet Page 81 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1110 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 1006 7,772.00 186,528.00 006 1110 ft exec Step: 2006 8,161.00 195,864.00
1110 ft exec Step: 3006 8,569.00 205,656.00
1110 ft exec Step: 4006 8,997.00 215,928.00
1110 ft exec Step: 5006 9,447.00 226,728.00
6805 COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER ft gem Step: 1353 2,857.00 68,568.00 353 6805 ft gem Step: 2353 3,003.00 72,072.00
6805 ft gem Step: 3353 3,152.00 75,648.00
6805 ft gem Step: 4353 3,308.00 79,392.00
6805 ft gem Step: 5353 3,478.00 83,472.00
1266 CONFERENCE CENTER GENERAL MGR ft mea Step: 1303 6,060.00 145,440.00 303 1266 ft mea Step: 2303 6,364.00 152,736.00
1266 ft mea Step: 3303 6,681.00 160,344.00
1266 ft mea Step: 4303 7,018.00 168,432.00
1266 ft mea Step: 5303 7,364.00 176,736.00
1287 CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1345 4,966.00 119,184.00 345 1287 ft mea Step: 2345 5,219.00 125,256.00
1287 ft mea Step: 3345 5,477.00 131,448.00
1287 ft mea Step: 4345 5,744.00 137,856.00
1287 ft mea Step: 5345 6,032.00 144,768.00
8101 COUNCIL MEMBER ft counc Step: 1301 482.63 11,583.12 301 6510 CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1143 2,056.00 49,344.00 143 6510 pt gem Step: 2143 2,161.00 51,864.00
6510 pt gem Step: 3143 2,268.00 54,432.00
6510 pt gem Step: 4143 2,380.00 57,120.00
6510 pt gem Step: 5143 2,503.00 60,072.00
1121 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY l pt mea Step: 1733 5,330.00 127,920.00 733 1121 pt mea Step: 2733 5,597.00 134,328.00
1121 pt mea Step: 3733 5,877.00 141,048.00
1121 pt mea Step: 4733 6,171.00 148,104.00
1121 pt mea Step: 5733 6,479.00 155,496.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 7 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 19, Packet Page 82 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1121 DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY ll pt mea Step: 1732 6,803.00 163,272.00 732 1121 pt mea Step: 2732 7,143.00 171,432.00
1121 pt mea Step: 3732 7,501.00 180,024.00
1121 pt mea Step: 4732 7,875.00 189,000.00
1121 pt mea Step: 5732 8,269.00 198,456.00
2204 DEPUTY FIRE MARSHALL pt mffa Step: 1209 5,546.00 133,104.00 209 2204 pt mffa Step: 2209 5,823.00 139,752.00
2204 pt mffa Step: 3209 6,116.00 146,784.00
2204 pt mffa Step: 4209 6,416.00 153,984.00
2204 pt mffa Step: 5209 6,738.00 161,712.00
1294 DEPUTY PW DIRECTOR/ADMIN ft mea Step: 1017 6,415.00 153,960.00 017 1294 ft mea Step: 2017 6,736.00 161,664.00
1294 ft mea Step: 3017 7,074.00 169,776.00
1294 ft mea Step: 4017 7,428.00 178,272.00
1294 ft mea Step: 5017 7,799.00 187,176.00
1247 DEPUTY PW DIRECTOR/CITY ENGNR ft mea Step: 1046 6,804.00 163,296.00 046 1247 ft mea Step: 2046 7,144.00 171,456.00
1247 ft mea Step: 3046 7,501.00 180,024.00
1247 ft mea Step: 4046 7,873.00 188,952.00
1247 ft mea Step: 5046 8,269.00 198,456.00
1209 DIVISION CHIEF pt fma Step: 1019 7,326.00 175,824.00 019 1209 pt fma Step: 2019 7,693.00 184,632.00
1209 pt fma Step: 3019 8,079.00 193,896.00
1209 pt fma Step: 4019 8,481.00 203,544.00
1209 pt fma Step: 5019 8,906.00 213,744.00
1278 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1330 5,900.00 141,600.00 330 1278 ft mea Step: 2330 6,195.00 148,680.00
1278 ft mea Step: 3330 6,504.00 156,096.00
1278 ft mea Step: 4330 6,830.00 163,920.00
1278 ft mea Step: 5330 7,171.00 172,104.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 8 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 20, Packet Page 83 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6203 ELECTRICIAN ft gem Step: 1124 3,650.00 87,600.00 124 6203 ft gem Step: 2124 3,832.00 91,968.00
6203 ft gem Step: 3124 4,026.00 96,624.00
6203 ft gem Step: 4124 4,226.00 101,424.00
6203 ft gem Step: 5124 4,437.00 106,488.00
6727 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1343 3,569.00 85,656.00 343 6727 ft gem Step: 2343 3,749.00 89,976.00
6727 ft gem Step: 3343 3,939.00 94,536.00
6727 ft gem Step: 4343 4,133.00 99,192.00
6727 ft gem Step: 5343 4,338.00 104,112.00
6728 ENGINEERING ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1364 4,035.00 96,840.00 364 6728 ft gem Step: 2364 4,234.00 101,616.00
6728 ft gem Step: 3364 4,453.00 106,872.00
6728 ft gem Step: 4364 4,670.00 112,080.00
6728 ft gem Step: 5364 4,905.00 117,720.00
1297 ENGINEERING PROGRAMS ANALYST ft gem Step: 1040 4,132.00 99,168.00 040 1297 ft gem Step: 2040 4,340.00 104,160.00
1297 ft gem Step: 3040 4,557.00 109,368.00
1297 ft gem Step: 4040 4,785.00 114,840.00
1297 ft gem Step: 5040 5,026.00 120,624.00
1286 ENGINEERING PROJECTS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1344 4,965.00 119,160.00 344 1286 ft mea Step: 2344 5,211.00 125,064.00
1286 ft mea Step: 3344 5,473.00 131,352.00
1286 ft mea Step: 4344 5,744.00 137,856.00
1286 ft mea Step: 5344 6,032.00 144,768.00
4103 ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1090 3,242.00 77,808.00 090 4103 ft gem Step: 2090 3,402.00 81,648.00
4103 ft gem Step: 3090 3,573.00 85,752.00
4103 ft gem Step: 4090 3,751.00 90,024.00
4103 ft gem Step: 5090 3,941.00 94,584.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 9 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 21, Packet Page 84 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1276 ENVIRONMENTAL REG ANALYST ft gem Step: 1329 4,132.00 99,168.00 329 1276 ft gem Step: 2329 4,340.00 104,160.00
1276 ft gem Step: 3329 4,557.00 109,368.00
1276 ft gem Step: 4329 4,785.00 114,840.00
1276 ft gem Step: 5329 5,026.00 120,624.00
4108 ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS MGR. ft mea Step: 1334 4,841.00 116,184.00 334 4108 ft mea Step: 2334 5,086.00 122,064.00
4108 ft mea Step: 3334 5,333.00 127,992.00
4108 ft mea Step: 4334 5,605.00 134,520.00
4108 ft mea Step: 5334 5,887.00 141,288.00
6517 EVENT & SALES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1086 2,555.00 61,320.00 086 6517 ft gem Step: 2086 2,682.00 64,368.00
6517 ft gem Step: 3086 2,816.00 67,584.00
6517 ft gem Step: 4086 2,958.00 70,992.00
6517 ft gem Step: 5086 3,108.00 74,592.00
6507 EVENT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1140 3,482.00 83,568.00 140 6507 pt gem Step: 2140 3,656.00 87,744.00
6507 pt gem Step: 3140 3,840.00 92,160.00
6507 pt gem Step: 4140 4,031.00 96,744.00
6507 pt gem Step: 5140 4,233.00 101,592.00
6513 EVENT SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1144 3,835.00 92,040.00 144 6513 pt gem Step: 2144 4,027.00 96,648.00
6513 pt gem Step: 3144 4,228.00 101,472.00
6513 pt gem Step: 4144 4,438.00 106,512.00
6513 pt gem Step: 5144 4,660.00 111,840.00
3318 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT I ft gem Step: 1288 2,889.00 69,336.00 288 3318 ft gem Step: 2288 3,035.00 72,840.00
3318 ft gem Step: 3288 3,188.00 76,512.00
3318 ft gem Step: 4288 3,347.00 80,328.00
3318 ft gem Step: 5288 3,516.00 84,384.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 10 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 22, Packet Page 85 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3324 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1289 3,238.00 77,712.00 289 3324 ft gem Step: 2289 3,398.00 81,552.00
3324 ft gem Step: 3289 3,570.00 85,680.00
3324 ft gem Step: 4289 3,748.00 89,952.00
3324 ft gem Step: 5289 3,937.00 94,488.00
5209 FACILITIES MAINT. COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1305 4,157.00 99,768.00 305 5209 ft gem Step: 2305 4,365.00 104,760.00
5209 ft gem Step: 3305 4,583.00 109,992.00
5209 ft gem Step: 4305 4,814.00 115,536.00
5209 ft gem Step: 5305 5,057.00 121,368.00
6504 FACILITY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1138 2,637.00 63,288.00 138 6504 pt gem Step: 2138 2,770.00 66,480.00
6504 pt gem Step: 3138 2,910.00 69,840.00
6504 pt gem Step: 4138 3,056.00 73,344.00
6504 pt gem Step: 5138 3,207.00 76,968.00
5205 FACILITY COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1111 3,482.00 83,568.00 111 5205 pt gem Step: 2111 3,656.00 87,744.00
5205 pt gem Step: 3111 3,840.00 92,160.00
5205 pt gem Step: 4111 4,031.00 96,744.00
5205 pt gem Step: 5111 4,233.00 101,592.00
3109 FIELD ASSISTANT pt gem Step: 1172 2,555.00 61,320.00 172 3109 pt gem Step: 2172 2,682.00 64,368.00
3109 pt gem Step: 3172 2,816.00 67,584.00
3109 pt gem Step: 4172 2,958.00 70,992.00
3109 pt gem Step: 5172 3,108.00 74,592.00
1252 FINANCE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1294 4,088.00 98,112.00 294 1252 ft mea Step: 2294 4,295.00 103,080.00
1252 ft mea Step: 3294 4,507.00 108,168.00
1252 ft mea Step: 4294 4,734.00 113,616.00
1252 ft mea Step: 5294 4,971.00 119,304.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 11 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 23, Packet Page 86 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1106 FINANCE DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 1004 8,011.00 192,264.00 004 1106 ft exec Step: 2004 8,411.00 201,864.00
1106 ft exec Step: 3004 8,832.00 211,968.00
1106 ft exec Step: 4004 9,273.00 222,552.00
1106 ft exec Step: 5004 9,737.00 233,688.00
1277 FINANCE MANAGER ft mea Step: 1051 5,829.00 139,896.00 051 1277 ft mea Step: 2051 6,121.00 146,904.00
1277 ft mea Step: 3051 6,428.00 154,272.00
1277 ft mea Step: 4051 6,751.00 162,024.00
1277 ft mea Step: 5051 7,080.00 169,920.00
2201 FIRE CAPTAIN ft mffa Step: 1059 5,281.00 126,744.00 059 2201 ft mffa Step: 2059 5,544.00 133,056.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 3059 5,821.00 139,704.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 4059 6,109.00 146,616.00
2201 ft mffa Step: 5059 6,415.00 153,960.00
1107 FIRE CHIEF ft exec Step: 1005 9,018.00 216,432.00 005 1107 ft exec Step: 2005 9,469.00 227,256.00
1107 ft exec Step: 3005 9,943.00 238,632.00
1107 ft exec Step: 4005 10,440.00 250,560.00
1107 ft exec Step: 5005 10,962.00 263,088.00
2203 FIRE ENGINEER ft mffa Step: 1060 4,560.00 109,440.00 060 2203 ft mffa Step: 2060 4,787.00 114,888.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 3060 5,028.00 120,672.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 4060 5,281.00 126,744.00
2203 ft mffa Step: 5060 5,544.00 133,056.00
2207 FIRE INSPECTOR I ft gem Step: 1178 3,359.00 80,616.00 178 2207 ft gem Step: 2178 3,529.00 84,696.00
2207 ft gem Step: 3178 3,705.00 88,920.00
2207 ft gem Step: 4178 3,890.00 93,360.00
2207 ft gem Step: 5178 4,084.00 98,016.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 12 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 24, Packet Page 87 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2208 FIRE INSPECTOR II ft gem Step: 1182 3,696.00 88,704.00 182 2208 ft gem Step: 2182 3,881.00 93,144.00
2208 ft gem Step: 3182 4,075.00 97,800.00
2208 ft gem Step: 4182 4,279.00 102,696.00
2208 ft gem Step: 5182 4,492.00 107,808.00
4309 FIRE PREV PLANS EXAM/INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1369 4,236.00 101,664.00 369 4309 ft gem Step: 2369 4,448.00 106,752.00
4309 ft gem Step: 3369 4,670.00 112,080.00
4309 ft gem Step: 4369 4,904.00 117,696.00
4309 ft gem Step: 5369 5,146.00 123,504.00
3329 FIRE PREVENTION TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1324 3,088.00 74,112.00 324 3329 ft gem Step: 2324 3,242.00 77,808.00
3329 ft gem Step: 3324 3,402.00 81,648.00
3329 ft gem Step: 4324 3,573.00 85,752.00
3329 ft gem Step: 5324 3,751.00 90,024.00
2206 FIREFIGHTER ft mffa Step: 1062 4,135.00 99,240.00 062 2206 ft mffa Step: 2062 4,342.00 104,208.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 3062 4,560.00 109,440.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 4062 4,787.00 114,888.00
2206 ft mffa Step: 5062 5,028.00 120,672.00
5212 FITNESS SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1375 4,074.00 97,776.00 375 5212 pt gem Step: 2375 4,274.00 102,576.00
5212 pt gem Step: 3375 4,488.00 107,712.00
5212 pt gem Step: 4375 4,711.00 113,064.00
5212 pt gem Step: 5375 4,946.00 118,704.00
6307 FLEET MANAGER rpt mea Step: 1360 4,643.00 111,432.00 360 6307 rpt mea Step: 2360 4,875.00 117,000.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 3360 5,118.00 122,832.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 4360 5,377.00 129,048.00
6307 rpt mea Step: 5360 5,646.00 135,504.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 13 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 25, Packet Page 88 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6810 FUND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1356 3,535.00 84,840.00 356 6810 pt gem Step: 2356 3,712.00 89,088.00
6810 pt gem Step: 3356 3,896.00 93,504.00
6810 pt gem Step: 4356 4,089.00 98,136.00
6810 pt gem Step: 5356 4,295.00 103,080.00
1285 GEN SERV FIELD OPERATION MGR ft mea Step: 1339 5,512.00 132,288.00 339 1285 ft mea Step: 2339 5,788.00 138,912.00
1285 ft mea Step: 3339 6,077.00 145,848.00
1285 ft mea Step: 4339 6,380.00 153,120.00
1285 ft mea Step: 5339 6,700.00 160,800.00
1272 GENERAL SRVC SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1313 6,220.00 149,280.00 313 1272 ft mea Step: 2313 6,526.00 156,624.00
1272 ft mea Step: 3313 6,858.00 164,592.00
1272 ft mea Step: 4313 7,199.00 172,776.00
1272 ft mea Step: 5313 7,559.00 181,416.00
3602 GEO INFO SYS (GIS) COORDINATOR ft mea Step: 1248 4,479.00 107,496.00 248 3602 ft mea Step: 2248 4,703.00 112,872.00
3602 ft mea Step: 3248 4,939.00 118,536.00
3602 ft mea Step: 4248 5,184.00 124,416.00
3602 ft mea Step: 5248 5,444.00 130,656.00
6720 GREENBELT COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1115 3,022.00 72,528.00 115 6720 pt gem Step: 2115 3,173.00 76,152.00
6720 pt gem Step: 3115 3,329.00 79,896.00
6720 pt gem Step: 4115 3,504.00 84,096.00
6720 pt gem Step: 5115 3,676.00 88,224.00
5307 GUEST SERVICE SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1372 2,369.00 56,856.00 372 5307 pt gem Step: 2372 2,490.00 59,760.00
5307 pt gem Step: 3372 2,615.00 62,760.00
5307 pt gem Step: 4372 2,746.00 65,904.00
5307 pt gem Step: 5372 2,881.00 69,144.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 14 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 26, Packet Page 89 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6111 HARBOR COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1359 3,482.00 83,568.00 359 6111 ft gem Step: 2359 3,656.00 87,744.00
6111 ft gem Step: 3359 3,840.00 92,160.00
6111 ft gem Step: 4359 4,031.00 96,744.00
6111 ft gem Step: 5359 4,233.00 101,592.00
6110 HARBOR MAINT. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1269 3,030.00 72,720.00 269 6110 ft gem Step: 2269 3,180.00 76,320.00
6110 ft gem Step: 3269 3,344.00 80,256.00
6110 ft gem Step: 4269 3,504.00 84,096.00
6110 ft gem Step: 5269 3,680.00 88,320.00
6102 HARBOR MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1186 3,260.00 78,240.00 186 6102 ft gem Step: 2186 3,422.00 82,128.00
6102 ft gem Step: 3186 3,598.00 86,352.00
6102 ft gem Step: 4186 3,774.00 90,576.00
6102 ft gem Step: 5186 3,965.00 95,160.00
6105 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER pt gem Step: 1120 2,732.00 65,568.00 120 6105 pt gem Step: 2120 2,869.00 68,856.00
6105 pt gem Step: 3120 3,016.00 72,384.00
6105 pt gem Step: 4120 3,165.00 75,960.00
6105 pt gem Step: 5120 3,325.00 79,800.00
1210 HARBORMASTER ft mea Step: 1020 5,829.00 139,896.00 020 1210 ft mea Step: 2020 6,121.00 146,904.00
1210 ft mea Step: 3020 6,428.00 154,272.00
1210 ft mea Step: 4020 6,751.00 162,024.00
1210 ft mea Step: 5020 7,080.00 169,920.00
4208 HCD COORDINATOR-PROJ &PROGRAMS ft gem Step: 1230 3,676.00 88,224.00 230 4208 ft gem Step: 2230 3,858.00 92,592.00
4208 ft gem Step: 3230 4,052.00 97,248.00
4208 ft gem Step: 4230 4,255.00 102,120.00
4208 ft gem Step: 5230 4,468.00 107,232.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 15 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 27, Packet Page 90 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6512 HISTORIC FAC. SR. CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1203 3,414.00 81,936.00 203 6512 ft gem Step: 2203 3,588.00 86,112.00
6512 ft gem Step: 3203 3,769.00 90,456.00
6512 ft gem Step: 4203 3,959.00 95,016.00
6512 ft gem Step: 5203 4,155.00 99,720.00
2106 HOMELESS NAVIGATOR ft gem Step: 1198 3,569.00 85,656.00 198 2106 ft gem Step: 2198 3,748.00 89,952.00
2106 ft gem Step: 3198 3,935.00 94,440.00
2106 ft gem Step: 4198 4,132.00 99,168.00
2106 ft gem Step: 5198 4,338.00 104,112.00
1289 HOUSING MANAGER ft mea Step: 1368 5,036.00 120,864.00 368 1289 ft mea Step: 2368 5,288.00 126,912.00
1289 ft mea Step: 3368 5,552.00 133,248.00
1289 ft mea Step: 4368 5,833.00 139,992.00
1289 ft mea Step: 5368 6,126.00 147,024.00
1250 HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST ft mea Step: 1267 4,088.00 98,112.00 267 1250 ft mea Step: 2267 4,295.00 103,080.00
1250 ft mea Step: 3267 4,508.00 108,192.00
1250 ft mea Step: 4267 4,734.00 113,616.00
1250 ft mea Step: 5267 4,971.00 119,304.00
3331 HUMAN RESOURCES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1335 2,624.00 62,976.00 335 3331 ft gem Step: 2335 2,755.00 66,120.00
3331 ft gem Step: 3335 2,893.00 69,432.00
3331 ft gem Step: 4335 3,038.00 72,912.00
3331 ft gem Step: 5335 3,192.00 76,608.00
3332 HUMAN RESOURCES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1361 3,482.00 83,568.00 361 3332 ft gem Step: 2361 3,656.00 87,744.00
3332 ft gem Step: 3361 3,840.00 92,160.00
3332 ft gem Step: 4361 4,031.00 96,744.00
3332 ft gem Step: 5361 4,233.00 101,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 16 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 28, Packet Page 91 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1112 HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 1277 7,902.00 189,648.00 277 1112 ft exec Step: 2277 8,297.00 199,128.00
1112 ft exec Step: 3277 8,712.00 209,088.00
1112 ft exec Step: 4277 9,148.00 219,552.00
1112 ft exec Step: 5277 9,605.00 230,520.00
3322 HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1280 3,139.00 75,336.00 280 3322 ft gem Step: 2280 3,294.00 79,056.00
3322 ft gem Step: 3280 3,456.00 82,944.00
3322 ft gem Step: 4280 3,631.00 87,144.00
3322 ft gem Step: 5280 3,813.00 91,512.00
4307 HVAC SENIOR TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1306 3,521.00 84,504.00 306 4307 ft gem Step: 2306 3,699.00 88,776.00
4307 ft gem Step: 3306 3,881.00 93,144.00
4307 ft gem Step: 4306 4,078.00 97,872.00
4307 ft gem Step: 5306 4,281.00 102,744.00
3107 INFORMATION TECH SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1378 3,484.00 83,616.00 378 3107 ft gem Step: 2378 3,658.00 87,792.00
3107 ft gem Step: 3378 3,844.00 92,256.00
3107 ft gem Step: 4378 4,034.00 96,816.00
3107 ft gem Step: 5378 4,236.00 101,664.00
4301 INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1100 4,035.00 96,840.00 100 4301 ft gem Step: 2100 4,234.00 101,616.00
4301 ft gem Step: 3100 4,453.00 106,872.00
4301 ft gem Step: 4100 4,670.00 112,080.00
4301 ft gem Step: 5100 4,905.00 117,720.00
3610 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER I ft gem Step: 1069 3,973.00 95,352.00 069 3610 ft gem Step: 2069 4,173.00 100,152.00
3610 ft gem Step: 3069 4,382.00 105,168.00
3610 ft gem Step: 4069 4,601.00 110,424.00
3610 ft gem Step: 5069 4,833.00 115,992.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 17 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 29, Packet Page 92 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1236 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER II ft gem Step: 1038 4,774.00 114,576.00 038 1236 ft gem Step: 2038 5,011.00 120,264.00
1236 ft gem Step: 3038 5,262.00 126,288.00
1236 ft gem Step: 4038 5,523.00 132,552.00
1236 ft gem Step: 5038 5,800.00 139,200.00
3611 IT APPLICATION ENGINEER III ft gem Step: 1080 5,164.00 123,936.00 080 3611 ft gem Step: 2080 5,422.00 130,128.00
3611 ft gem Step: 3080 5,692.00 136,608.00
3611 ft gem Step: 4080 5,977.00 143,448.00
3611 ft gem Step: 5080 6,272.00 150,528.00
3604 IT NETWORK ENGINEER I ft mea Step: 1380 5,165.00 123,960.00 380 3604 ft mea Step: 2380 5,422.00 130,128.00
3604 ft mea Step: 3380 5,688.00 136,512.00
3604 ft mea Step: 4380 5,977.00 143,448.00
3604 ft mea Step: 5380 6,269.00 150,456.00
6508 LAUNDRY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1250 1,363.00 32,712.00 250 6508 pt gem Step: 2250 1,434.00 34,416.00
6508 pt gem Step: 3250 1,502.00 36,048.00
6508 pt gem Step: 4250 1,580.00 37,920.00
6508 pt gem Step: 5250 1,655.00 39,720.00
6518 LEAD CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1142 2,539.00 60,936.00 142 6518 pt gem Step: 2142 2,667.00 64,008.00
6518 pt gem Step: 3142 2,801.00 67,224.00
6518 pt gem Step: 4142 2,941.00 70,584.00
6518 pt gem Step: 5142 3,087.00 74,088.00
6304 LEAD MECHANIC rpt gem Step: 1254 3,401.00 81,624.00 254 6304 rpt gem Step: 2254 3,577.00 85,848.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 3254 3,751.00 90,024.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 4254 3,941.00 94,584.00
6304 rpt gem Step: 5254 4,134.00 99,216.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 18 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 30, Packet Page 93 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 3316 LEGAL SECRETARY pt gem Step: 1078 2,889.00 69,336.00 078 3316 pt gem Step: 2078 3,035.00 72,840.00
3316 pt gem Step: 3078 3,188.00 76,512.00
3316 pt gem Step: 4078 3,347.00 80,328.00
3316 pt gem Step: 5078 3,516.00 84,384.00
5101 LIBRARIAN pt gem Step: 1104 3,332.00 79,968.00 104 5101 pt gem Step: 2104 3,495.00 83,880.00
5101 pt gem Step: 3104 3,673.00 88,152.00
5101 pt gem Step: 4104 3,854.00 92,496.00
5101 pt gem Step: 5104 4,047.00 97,128.00
3101 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I pt gem Step: 1063 2,436.00 58,464.00 063 3101 pt gem Step: 2063 2,556.00 61,344.00
3101 pt gem Step: 3063 2,683.00 64,392.00
3101 pt gem Step: 4063 2,818.00 67,632.00
3101 pt gem Step: 5063 2,959.00 71,016.00
3102 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II ft gem Step: 1064 2,555.00 61,320.00 064 3102 ft gem Step: 2064 2,682.00 64,368.00
3102 ft gem Step: 3064 2,816.00 67,584.00
3102 ft gem Step: 4064 2,958.00 70,992.00
3102 ft gem Step: 5064 3,108.00 74,592.00
1105 LIBRARY DIRECTOR pt exec Step: 1003 7,568.00 181,632.00 003 1105 pt exec Step: 2003 7,946.00 190,704.00
1105 pt exec Step: 3003 8,344.00 200,256.00
1105 pt exec Step: 4003 8,761.00 210,264.00
1105 pt exec Step: 5003 9,199.00 220,776.00
1255 LIBRARY MANAGER pt mea Step: 1028 4,929.00 118,296.00 028 1255 pt mea Step: 2028 5,174.00 124,176.00
1255 pt mea Step: 3028 5,430.00 130,320.00
1255 pt mea Step: 4028 5,705.00 136,920.00
1255 pt mea Step: 5028 5,986.00 143,664.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 19 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 31, Packet Page 94 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6718 MAINTENANCE SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1299 2,539.00 60,936.00 299 6718 pt gem Step: 2299 2,667.00 64,008.00
6718 pt gem Step: 3299 2,801.00 67,224.00
6718 pt gem Step: 4299 2,936.00 70,464.00
6718 pt gem Step: 5299 3,086.00 74,064.00
6109 MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1216 3,047.00 73,128.00 216 6109 ft gem Step: 2216 3,200.00 76,800.00
6109 ft gem Step: 3216 3,357.00 80,568.00
6109 ft gem Step: 4216 3,527.00 84,648.00
6109 ft gem Step: 5216 3,705.00 88,920.00
1249 MANAGEMENT ANALYST I ft mea Step: 1187 4,088.00 98,112.00 187 1249 ft mea Step: 2187 4,295.00 103,080.00
1249 ft mea Step: 3187 4,508.00 108,192.00
1249 ft mea Step: 4187 4,734.00 113,616.00
1249 ft mea Step: 5187 4,971.00 119,304.00
1301 MANAGEMENT ANALYST II ft mea Step: 1047 4,962.00 119,088.00 047 1301 ft mea Step: 2047 5,210.00 125,040.00
1301 ft mea Step: 3047 5,470.00 131,280.00
1301 ft mea Step: 4047 5,744.00 137,856.00
1301 ft mea Step: 5047 6,032.00 144,768.00
3328 MARINA HARBOR ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1298 3,238.00 77,712.00 298 3328 ft gem Step: 2298 3,398.00 81,552.00
3328 ft gem Step: 3298 3,570.00 85,680.00
3328 ft gem Step: 4298 3,748.00 89,952.00
3328 ft gem Step: 5298 3,937.00 94,488.00
8101 MAYOR ft counc Step: 1300 708.75 17,010.00 300
6813 MEDIA SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1094 2,555.00 61,320.00 094 6813 pt gem Step: 2094 2,682.00 64,368.00
6813 pt gem Step: 3094 2,816.00 67,584.00
6813 pt gem Step: 4094 2,958.00 70,992.00
6813 pt gem Step: 5094 3,108.00 74,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 20 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 32, Packet Page 95 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 5306 MEDICAL RECORDS ASSISTANT pt gem Step: 1711 2,555.00 61,320.00 711 5306 pt gem Step: 2711 2,682.00 64,368.00
5306 pt gem Step: 3711 2,816.00 67,584.00
5306 pt gem Step: 4711 2,958.00 70,992.00
5306 pt gem Step: 5711 3,108.00 74,592.00
1282 MUSEUM CULTURAL ARTS /ARCH MGR pt mea Step: 1336 4,088.00 98,112.00 336 1282 pt mea Step: 2336 4,295.00 103,080.00
1282 pt mea Step: 3336 4,508.00 108,192.00
1282 pt mea Step: 4336 4,734.00 113,616.00
1282 pt mea Step: 5336 4,971.00 119,304.00
1284 NETWORK ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1338 4,965.00 119,160.00 338 1284 ft mea Step: 2338 5,211.00 125,064.00
1284 ft mea Step: 3338 5,473.00 131,352.00
1284 ft mea Step: 4338 5,744.00 137,856.00
1284 ft mea Step: 5338 6,032.00 144,768.00
6515 OPERATIONS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1322 3,482.00 83,568.00 322 6515 pt gem Step: 2322 3,656.00 87,744.00
6515 pt gem Step: 3322 3,840.00 92,160.00
6515 pt gem Step: 4322 4,031.00 96,744.00
6515 pt gem Step: 5322 4,233.00 101,592.00
6506 OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1139 3,835.00 92,040.00 139 6506 pt gem Step: 2139 4,027.00 96,648.00
6506 pt gem Step: 3139 4,228.00 101,472.00
6506 pt gem Step: 4139 4,438.00 106,512.00
6506 pt gem Step: 5139 4,660.00 111,840.00
6703 PARK ATTENDANT ft gem Step: 1158 2,755.00 66,120.00 158 6703 ft gem Step: 2158 2,895.00 69,480.00
6703 ft gem Step: 3158 3,039.00 72,936.00
6703 ft gem Step: 4158 3,190.00 76,560.00
6703 ft gem Step: 5158 3,353.00 80,472.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 21 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 33, Packet Page 96 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6704 PARK MAINTENANCE CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1194 2,824.00 67,776.00 194 6704 ft gem Step: 2194 2,966.00 71,184.00
6704 ft gem Step: 3194 3,113.00 74,712.00
6704 ft gem Step: 4194 3,268.00 78,432.00
6704 ft gem Step: 5194 3,429.00 82,296.00
6705 PARK MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1160 3,112.00 74,688.00 160 6705 ft gem Step: 2160 3,267.00 78,408.00
6705 ft gem Step: 3160 3,426.00 82,224.00
6705 ft gem Step: 4160 3,596.00 86,304.00
6705 ft gem Step: 5160 3,780.00 90,720.00
6701 PARK MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1156 3,598.00 86,352.00 156 6701 ft gem Step: 2156 3,780.00 90,720.00
6701 ft gem Step: 3156 3,971.00 95,304.00
6701 ft gem Step: 4156 4,167.00 100,008.00
6701 ft gem Step: 5156 4,374.00 104,976.00
6706 PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1161 2,323.00 55,752.00 161 6706 ft gem Step: 2161 2,440.00 58,560.00
6706 ft gem Step: 3161 2,562.00 61,488.00
6706 ft gem Step: 4161 2,691.00 64,584.00
6706 ft gem Step: 5161 2,824.00 67,776.00
6706 ft gem Step: 6161 2,965.00 71,160.00
6706 ft gem Step: 7161 3,113.00 74,712.00
1283 PARK OPERATIONS MANAGER ft mea Step: 1337 4,643.00 111,432.00 337 1283 ft mea Step: 2337 4,875.00 117,000.00
1283 ft mea Step: 3337 5,118.00 122,832.00
1283 ft mea Step: 4337 5,377.00 129,048.00
1283 ft mea Step: 5337 5,646.00 135,504.00
6606 PARKING CONTROLS TECHNICIAN pt gem Step: 1274 3,179.00 76,296.00 274 6606 pt gem Step: 2274 3,336.00 80,064.00
6606 pt gem Step: 3274 3,503.00 84,072.00
6606 pt gem Step: 4274 3,682.00 88,368.00
6606 pt gem Step: 5274 3,863.00 92,712.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 22 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 34, Packet Page 97 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6601 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER ft gem Step: 1145 2,732.00 65,568.00 145 6601 ft gem Step: 2145 2,871.00 68,904.00
6601 ft gem Step: 3145 3,015.00 72,360.00
6601 ft gem Step: 4145 3,164.00 75,936.00
6601 ft gem Step: 5145 3,325.00 79,800.00
6605 PARKING ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1149 3,833.00 91,992.00 149 6605 ft gem Step: 2149 4,027.00 96,648.00
6605 ft gem Step: 3149 4,228.00 101,472.00
6605 ft gem Step: 4149 4,438.00 106,512.00
6605 ft gem Step: 5149 4,660.00 111,840.00
6615 PARKING MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER pt gem Step: 1159 3,260.00 78,240.00 159 6615 pt gem Step: 2159 3,422.00 82,128.00
6615 pt gem Step: 3159 3,598.00 86,352.00
6615 pt gem Step: 4159 3,774.00 90,576.00
6615 pt gem Step: 5159 3,965.00 95,160.00
6604 PARKING MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR pt gem Step: 1148 3,856.00 92,544.00 148 6604 pt gem Step: 2148 4,051.00 97,224.00
6604 pt gem Step: 3148 4,254.00 102,096.00
6604 pt gem Step: 4148 4,465.00 107,160.00
6604 pt gem Step: 5148 4,688.00 112,512.00
6608 PARKING MAINTENANCE WORKER pt gem Step: 1151 2,318.00 55,632.00 151 6608 pt gem Step: 2151 2,434.00 58,416.00
6608 pt gem Step: 3151 2,555.00 61,320.00
6608 pt gem Step: 4151 2,683.00 64,392.00
6608 pt gem Step: 5151 2,817.00 67,608.00
6608 pt gem Step: 6151 2,957.00 70,968.00
6608 pt gem Step: 7151 3,105.00 74,520.00
6616 PARKING SERVICES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1116 4,160.00 99,840.00 116 6616 ft gem Step: 2116 4,365.00 104,760.00
6616 ft gem Step: 3116 4,583.00 109,992.00
6616 ft gem Step: 4116 4,814.00 115,536.00
6616 ft gem Step: 5116 5,057.00 121,368.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 23 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 35, Packet Page 98 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6617 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV ft gem Step: 1117 2,555.00 61,320.00 117 6617 ft gem Step: 2117 2,683.00 64,392.00
6617 ft gem Step: 3117 2,817.00 67,608.00
6617 ft gem Step: 4117 2,957.00 70,968.00
6617 ft gem Step: 5117 3,105.00 74,520.00
6618 PARKING SERVICES SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1118 3,157.00 75,768.00 118 6618 ft gem Step: 2118 3,313.00 79,512.00
6618 ft gem Step: 3118 3,477.00 83,448.00
6618 ft gem Step: 4118 3,653.00 87,672.00
6618 ft gem Step: 5118 3,836.00 92,064.00
1212 PARKING SUPERINTENDENT ft mea Step: 1022 5,829.00 139,896.00 022 1212 ft mea Step: 2022 6,121.00 146,904.00
1212 ft mea Step: 3022 6,428.00 154,272.00
1212 ft mea Step: 4022 6,751.00 162,024.00
1212 ft mea Step: 5022 7,080.00 169,920.00
1292 PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 1014 7,772.00 186,528.00 014 1292 ft exec Step: 2014 8,161.00 195,864.00
1292 ft exec Step: 3014 8,569.00 205,656.00
1292 ft exec Step: 4014 8,997.00 215,928.00
1292 ft exec Step: 5014 9,447.00 226,728.00
6711 PARKS CRAFTS LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1264 3,086.00 74,064.00 264 6711 ft gem Step: 2264 3,240.00 77,760.00
6711 ft gem Step: 3264 3,398.00 81,552.00
6711 ft gem Step: 4264 3,567.00 85,608.00
6711 ft gem Step: 5264 3,749.00 89,976.00
6305 PARTS CLERK ft gem Step: 1253 2,555.00 61,320.00 253 6305 ft gem Step: 2253 2,683.00 64,392.00
6305 ft gem Step: 3253 2,817.00 67,608.00
6305 ft gem Step: 4253 2,957.00 70,968.00
6305 ft gem Step: 5253 3,105.00 74,520.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 24 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 36, Packet Page 99 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1215 PLANNING MANAGER ft mea Step: 1025 6,650.00 159,600.00 025 1215 ft mea Step: 2025 6,982.00 167,568.00
1215 ft mea Step: 3025 7,332.00 175,968.00
1215 ft mea Step: 4025 7,699.00 184,776.00
1215 ft mea Step: 5025 8,084.00 194,016.00
4305 PLANS EXAMINER ft gem Step: 1258 4,236.00 101,664.00 258 4305 ft gem Step: 2258 4,448.00 106,752.00
4305 ft gem Step: 3258 4,670.00 112,080.00
4305 ft gem Step: 4258 4,904.00 117,696.00
4305 ft gem Step: 5258 5,146.00 123,504.00
1111 POLICE CHIEF ft exec Step: 1007 9,737.00 233,688.00 007 1111 ft exec Step: 2007 10,224.00 245,376.00
1111 ft exec Step: 3007 10,735.00 257,640.00
1111 ft exec Step: 4007 11,271.00 270,504.00
1111 ft exec Step: 5007 11,835.00 284,040.00
1214 POLICE LIEUTENANT ft plma Step: 1024 7,407.00 177,768.00 024 1214 ft plma Step: 2024 7,778.00 186,672.00
1214 ft plma Step: 3024 8,171.00 196,104.00
1214 ft plma Step: 4024 8,579.00 205,896.00
1214 ft plma Step: 5024 9,006.00 216,144.00
2103 POLICE OFFICER ft mpa Step: 1057 4,729.00 113,496.00 057 2103 ft mpa Step: 2057 4,966.00 119,184.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 3057 5,218.00 125,232.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 4057 5,473.00 131,352.00
2103 ft mpa Step: 5057 5,743.00 137,832.00
3201 POLICE RECORDS/DETENTION SUP. ft gem Step: 1191 4,321.00 103,704.00 191 3201 ft gem Step: 2191 4,538.00 108,912.00
3201 ft gem Step: 3191 4,765.00 114,360.00
3201 ft gem Step: 4191 5,003.00 120,072.00
3201 ft gem Step: 5191 5,255.00 126,120.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 25 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 37, Packet Page 100 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 2105 POLICE SERGEANT ft mpa Step: 1058 5,773.00 138,552.00 058 2105 ft mpa Step: 2058 6,058.00 145,392.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 3058 6,363.00 152,712.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 4058 6,680.00 160,320.00
2105 ft mpa Step: 5058 7,020.00 168,480.00
3209 POLICE SERVICES ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1346 2,624.00 62,976.00 346 3209 ft gem Step: 2346 2,755.00 66,120.00
3209 ft gem Step: 3346 2,893.00 69,432.00
3209 ft gem Step: 4346 3,038.00 72,912.00
3209 ft gem Step: 5346 3,192.00 76,608.00
3205 POLICE SERVICES TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1068 3,229.00 77,496.00 068 3205 ft gem Step: 2068 3,389.00 81,336.00
3205 ft gem Step: 3068 3,558.00 85,392.00
3205 ft gem Step: 4068 3,737.00 89,688.00
3205 ft gem Step: 5068 3,923.00 94,152.00
1267 PRINCIPAL PLANNER ft mea Step: 1307 5,398.00 129,552.00 307 1267 ft mea Step: 2307 5,670.00 136,080.00
1267 ft mea Step: 3307 5,950.00 142,800.00
1267 ft mea Step: 4307 6,249.00 149,976.00
1267 ft mea Step: 5307 6,561.00 157,464.00
1259 PROPERTY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1030 5,291.00 126,984.00 030 1259 ft mea Step: 2030 5,620.00 134,880.00
1259 ft mea Step: 3030 5,952.00 142,848.00
1259 ft mea Step: 4030 6,281.00 150,744.00
1259 ft mea Step: 5030 6,612.00 158,688.00
3306 PROPERTY TECHNICIAN ft gem Step: 1219 3,086.00 74,064.00 219 3306 ft gem Step: 2219 3,241.00 77,784.00
3306 ft gem Step: 3219 3,403.00 81,672.00
3306 ft gem Step: 4219 3,572.00 85,728.00
3306 ft gem Step: 5219 3,751.00 90,024.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 26 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 38, Packet Page 101 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1116 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ft exec Step: 1009 8,495.00 203,880.00 009 1116 ft exec Step: 2009 8,920.00 214,080.00
1116 ft exec Step: 3009 9,366.00 224,784.00
1116 ft exec Step: 4009 9,834.00 236,016.00
1116 ft exec Step: 5009 10,326.00 247,824.00
4105 PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1092 3,675.00 88,200.00 092 4105 ft gem Step: 2092 3,857.00 92,568.00
4105 ft gem Step: 3092 4,053.00 97,272.00
4105 ft gem Step: 4092 4,257.00 102,168.00
4105 ft gem Step: 5092 4,469.00 107,256.00
1275 PURCHASING ANALYST ft mea Step: 1327 4,089.00 98,136.00 327 1275 ft mea Step: 2327 4,294.00 103,056.00
1275 ft mea Step: 3327 4,509.00 108,216.00
1275 ft mea Step: 4327 4,734.00 113,616.00
1275 ft mea Step: 5327 4,971.00 119,304.00
1234 PW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES MGR ft mea Step: 1036 5,829.00 139,896.00 036 1234 ft mea Step: 2036 6,121.00 146,904.00
1234 ft mea Step: 3036 6,428.00 154,272.00
1234 ft mea Step: 4036 6,751.00 162,024.00
1234 ft mea Step: 5036 7,080.00 169,920.00
4102 QUALITY CONTROL INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1234 4,035.00 96,840.00 234 4102 ft gem Step: 2234 4,234.00 101,616.00
4102 ft gem Step: 3234 4,453.00 106,872.00
4102 ft gem Step: 4234 4,670.00 112,080.00
4102 ft gem Step: 5234 4,905.00 117,720.00
5208 RECREATION COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1292 3,482.00 83,568.00 292 5208 pt gem Step: 2292 3,656.00 87,744.00
5208 pt gem Step: 3292 3,840.00 92,160.00
5208 pt gem Step: 4292 4,031.00 96,744.00
5208 pt gem Step: 5292 4,233.00 101,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 27 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 39, Packet Page 102 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1230 RECREATION MANAGER ft mea Step: 1291 5,829.00 139,896.00 291 1230 ft mea Step: 2291 6,121.00 146,904.00
1230 ft mea Step: 3291 6,428.00 154,272.00
1230 ft mea Step: 4291 6,751.00 162,024.00
1230 ft mea Step: 5291 7,080.00 169,920.00
9581 RECREATION SPECIALIST pt gem Step: 1323 2,369.00 56,856.00 323 9581 pt gem Step: 2323 2,490.00 59,760.00
9581 pt gem Step: 3323 2,615.00 62,760.00
9581 pt gem Step: 4323 2,746.00 65,904.00
9581 pt gem Step: 5323 2,881.00 69,144.00
5201 RECREATION SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1259 4,074.00 97,776.00 259 5201 ft gem Step: 2259 4,274.00 102,576.00
5201 ft gem Step: 3259 4,488.00 107,712.00
5201 ft gem Step: 4259 4,711.00 113,064.00
5201 ft gem Step: 5259 4,946.00 118,704.00
1256 RISK MANAGER ft mea Step: 1052 4,859.00 116,616.00 052 1256 ft mea Step: 2052 5,099.00 122,376.00
1256 ft mea Step: 3052 5,351.00 128,424.00
1256 ft mea Step: 4052 5,618.00 134,832.00
1256 ft mea Step: 5052 5,899.00 141,576.00
3333 RISK SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1371 3,139.00 75,336.00 371 3333 ft gem Step: 2371 3,294.00 79,056.00
3333 ft gem Step: 3371 3,456.00 82,944.00
3333 ft gem Step: 4371 3,631.00 87,144.00
3333 ft gem Step: 5371 3,813.00 91,512.00
6516 SALES COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1081 3,482.00 83,568.00 081 6516 ft gem Step: 2081 3,656.00 87,744.00
6516 ft gem Step: 3081 3,840.00 92,160.00
6516 ft gem Step: 4081 4,031.00 96,744.00
6516 ft gem Step: 5081 4,233.00 101,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 28 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 40, Packet Page 103 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1263 SENIOR ACCOUNTANT ft mea Step: 1262 4,673.00 112,152.00 262 1263 ft mea Step: 2262 4,904.00 117,696.00
1263 ft mea Step: 3262 5,146.00 123,504.00
1263 ft mea Step: 4262 5,404.00 129,696.00
1263 ft mea Step: 5262 5,674.00 136,176.00
1265 SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE ANALYST ft mea Step: 1284 4,673.00 112,152.00 284 1265 ft mea Step: 2284 4,904.00 117,696.00
1265 ft mea Step: 3284 5,146.00 123,504.00
1265 ft mea Step: 4284 5,404.00 129,696.00
1265 ft mea Step: 5284 5,674.00 136,176.00
4201 SENIOR ASSOCIATE PLANNER ft gem Step: 1251 4,526.00 108,624.00 251 4201 ft gem Step: 2251 4,754.00 114,096.00
4201 ft gem Step: 3251 4,992.00 119,808.00
4201 ft gem Step: 4251 5,237.00 125,688.00
4201 ft gem Step: 5251 5,501.00 132,024.00
4302 SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1101 4,236.00 101,664.00 101 4302 ft gem Step: 2101 4,448.00 106,752.00
4302 ft gem Step: 3101 4,670.00 112,080.00
4302 ft gem Step: 4101 4,904.00 117,696.00
4302 ft gem Step: 5101 5,146.00 123,504.00
6511 SENIOR CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1205 3,414.00 81,936.00 205 6511 ft gem Step: 2205 3,588.00 86,112.00
6511 ft gem Step: 3205 3,769.00 90,456.00
6511 ft gem Step: 4205 3,959.00 95,016.00
6511 ft gem Step: 5205 4,155.00 99,720.00
6514 SENIOR CUSTODIAN pt gem Step: 1257 2,262.00 54,288.00 257 6514 pt gem Step: 2257 2,373.00 56,952.00
6514 pt gem Step: 3257 2,493.00 59,832.00
6514 pt gem Step: 4257 2,620.00 62,880.00
6514 pt gem Step: 5257 2,753.00 66,072.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 29 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 41, Packet Page 104 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1246 SENIOR ENGINEER ft mea Step: 1256 5,926.00 142,224.00 256 1246 ft mea Step: 2256 6,239.00 149,736.00
1246 ft mea Step: 3256 6,568.00 157,632.00
1246 ft mea Step: 4256 6,913.00 165,912.00
1246 ft mea Step: 5256 7,636.00 183,264.00
6505 SENIOR FACILITY ATTENDANT pt gem Step: 1211 3,252.00 78,048.00 211 6505 pt gem Step: 2211 3,414.00 81,936.00
6505 pt gem Step: 3211 3,583.00 85,992.00
6505 pt gem Step: 4211 3,762.00 90,288.00
6505 pt gem Step: 5211 3,953.00 94,872.00
1296 SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST ft mea Step: 1376 4,673.00 112,152.00 376 1296 ft mea Step: 2376 4,904.00 117,696.00
1296 ft mea Step: 3376 5,146.00 123,504.00
1296 ft mea Step: 4376 5,404.00 129,696.00
1296 ft mea Step: 5376 5,674.00 136,176.00
3607 SENIOR INFORMATION TECH SPECIA ft gem Step: 1084 3,881.00 93,144.00 084 3607 ft gem Step: 2084 4,075.00 97,800.00
3607 ft gem Step: 3084 4,278.00 102,672.00
3607 ft gem Step: 4084 4,492.00 107,808.00
3607 ft gem Step: 5084 4,716.00 113,184.00
1279 SENIOR LOCKSMITH ft gem Step: 1331 3,414.00 81,936.00 331 1279 ft gem Step: 2331 3,588.00 86,112.00
1279 ft gem Step: 3331 3,769.00 90,456.00
1279 ft gem Step: 4331 3,959.00 95,016.00
1279 ft gem Step: 5331 4,155.00 99,720.00
6707 SENIOR PARK MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1162 2,824.00 67,776.00 162 6707 ft gem Step: 2162 2,966.00 71,184.00
6707 ft gem Step: 3162 3,113.00 74,712.00
6707 ft gem Step: 4162 3,268.00 78,432.00
6707 ft gem Step: 5162 3,429.00 82,296.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 30 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 42, Packet Page 105 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6613 SENIOR PARKING CONTROLS TECH. pt gem Step: 1275 3,482.00 83,568.00 275 6613 pt gem Step: 2275 3,656.00 87,744.00
6613 pt gem Step: 3275 3,841.00 92,184.00
6613 pt gem Step: 4275 4,032.00 96,768.00
6613 pt gem Step: 5275 4,233.00 101,592.00
6611 SENIOR PARKING ENFOR. OFFICER ft gem Step: 1154 3,130.00 75,120.00 154 6611 ft gem Step: 2154 3,287.00 78,888.00
6611 ft gem Step: 3154 3,450.00 82,800.00
6611 ft gem Step: 4154 3,624.00 86,976.00
6611 ft gem Step: 5154 3,805.00 91,320.00
6803 SENIOR PARTS CLERK ft gem Step: 1347 3,030.00 72,720.00 347 6803 ft gem Step: 2347 3,180.00 76,320.00
6803 ft gem Step: 3347 3,344.00 80,256.00
6803 ft gem Step: 4347 3,504.00 84,096.00
6803 ft gem Step: 5347 3,680.00 88,320.00
3207 SENIOR POLICE SERVICES TECH. ft gem Step: 1070 3,389.00 81,336.00 070 3207 ft gem Step: 2070 3,558.00 85,392.00
3207 ft gem Step: 3070 3,737.00 89,688.00
3207 ft gem Step: 4070 3,923.00 94,152.00
3207 ft gem Step: 5070 4,121.00 98,904.00
1219 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER ft mea Step: 1029 5,512.00 132,288.00 029 1219 ft mea Step: 2029 5,788.00 138,912.00
1219 ft mea Step: 3029 6,077.00 145,848.00
1219 ft mea Step: 4029 6,380.00 153,120.00
1219 ft mea Step: 5029 6,700.00 160,800.00
4104 SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR ft gem Step: 1093 4,035.00 96,840.00 093 4104 ft gem Step: 2093 4,234.00 101,616.00
4104 ft gem Step: 3093 4,453.00 106,872.00
4104 ft gem Step: 4093 4,670.00 112,080.00
4104 ft gem Step: 5093 4,905.00 117,720.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 31 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 43, Packet Page 106 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6206 SENIOR STREET MAINT. WORKER ft gem Step: 1126 2,843.00 68,232.00 126 6206 ft gem Step: 2126 2,986.00 71,664.00
6206 ft gem Step: 3126 3,136.00 75,264.00
6206 ft gem Step: 4126 3,292.00 79,008.00
6206 ft gem Step: 5126 3,454.00 82,896.00
6212 SIGN CRAFTSWORKER ft gem Step: 1183 3,030.00 72,720.00 183 6212 ft gem Step: 2183 3,180.00 76,320.00
6212 ft gem Step: 3183 3,344.00 80,256.00
6212 ft gem Step: 4183 3,504.00 84,096.00
6212 ft gem Step: 5183 3,680.00 88,320.00
6811 SPECIAL EVENT COORDINATOR ft gem Step: 1106 3,482.00 83,568.00 106 6811 ft gem Step: 2106 3,656.00 87,744.00
6811 ft gem Step: 3106 3,840.00 92,160.00
6811 ft gem Step: 4106 4,031.00 96,744.00
6811 ft gem Step: 5106 4,233.00 101,592.00
5102 SPECIAL SERVICES COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1199 3,677.00 88,248.00 199 5102 pt gem Step: 2199 3,858.00 92,592.00
5102 pt gem Step: 3199 4,053.00 97,272.00
5102 pt gem Step: 4199 4,255.00 102,120.00
5102 pt gem Step: 5199 4,469.00 107,256.00
1258 SPORTS CENTER MANAGER pt mea Step: 1217 5,829.00 139,896.00 217 1258 pt mea Step: 2217 6,119.00 146,856.00
1258 pt mea Step: 3217 6,427.00 154,248.00
1258 pt mea Step: 4217 6,747.00 161,928.00
1258 pt mea Step: 5217 7,080.00 169,920.00
5204 SPORTS COORDINATOR pt gem Step: 1110 3,482.00 83,568.00 110 5204 pt gem Step: 2110 3,656.00 87,744.00
5204 pt gem Step: 3110 3,840.00 92,160.00
5204 pt gem Step: 4110 4,031.00 96,744.00
5204 pt gem Step: 5110 4,233.00 101,592.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 32 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 44, Packet Page 107 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 6204 STREET & UTILITIES SUPERVISOR ft gem Step: 1252 3,767.00 90,408.00 252 6204 ft gem Step: 2252 3,953.00 94,872.00
6204 ft gem Step: 3252 4,153.00 99,672.00
6204 ft gem Step: 4252 4,362.00 104,688.00
6204 ft gem Step: 5252 4,578.00 109,872.00
6208 STREET MAINTENANCE LEADWORKER ft gem Step: 1128 3,135.00 75,240.00 128 6208 ft gem Step: 2128 3,291.00 78,984.00
6208 ft gem Step: 3128 3,451.00 82,824.00
6208 ft gem Step: 4128 3,623.00 86,952.00
6208 ft gem Step: 5128 3,807.00 91,368.00
6209 STREET MAINTENANCE WORKER ft gem Step: 1129 2,340.00 56,160.00 129 6209 ft gem Step: 2129 2,458.00 58,992.00
6209 ft gem Step: 3129 2,579.00 61,896.00
6209 ft gem Step: 4129 2,709.00 65,016.00
6209 ft gem Step: 5129 2,843.00 68,232.00
6209 ft gem Step: 6129 2,985.00 71,640.00
6209 ft gem Step: 7129 3,136.00 75,264.00
9214 STREETS & UTILITIES OPERAT MGR ft mea Step: 1363 4,643.00 111,432.00 363 9214 ft mea Step: 2363 4,875.00 117,000.00
9214 ft mea Step: 3363 5,118.00 122,832.00
9214 ft mea Step: 4363 5,377.00 129,048.00
9214 ft mea Step: 5363 5,646.00 135,504.00
5308 SUSTAINABILITY ASSISTANT ft gem Step: 1374 3,569.00 85,656.00 374 5308 ft gem Step: 2374 3,749.00 89,976.00
5308 ft gem Step: 3374 3,939.00 94,536.00
5308 ft gem Step: 4374 4,133.00 99,192.00
5308 ft gem Step: 5374 4,338.00 104,112.00
1295 SUSTAINABILITY MANAGER ft mea Step: 1365 5,100.00 122,400.00 365 1295 ft mea Step: 2365 5,355.00 128,520.00
1295 ft mea Step: 3365 5,623.00 134,952.00
1295 ft mea Step: 4365 5,906.00 141,744.00
1295 ft mea Step: 5365 6,203.00 148,872.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 33 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 45, Packet Page 108 8/12/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE Group Semi-Monthly Rate Annual Rate GRADE 1291 SYSTEMS AND NETWORK ADMIN ft mea Step: 1358 5,605.00 134,520.00 358 1291 ft mea Step: 2358 5,886.00 141,264.00
1291 ft mea Step: 3358 6,181.00 148,344.00
1291 ft mea Step: 4358 6,491.00 155,784.00
1291 ft mea Step: 5358 6,808.00 163,392.00
3103 TECHNOLOGY SVCS. SPECIALIST ft gem Step: 1271 3,139.00 75,336.00 271 3103 ft gem Step: 2271 3,294.00 79,056.00
3103 ft gem Step: 3271 3,456.00 82,944.00
3103 ft gem Step: 4271 3,631.00 87,144.00
3103 ft gem Step: 5271 3,813.00 91,512.00
1253 URBAN FORESTER pt mea Step: 1321 4,298.00 103,152.00 321 1253 pt mea Step: 2321 4,515.00 108,360.00
1253 pt mea Step: 3321 4,738.00 113,712.00
1253 pt mea Step: 4321 4,974.00 119,376.00
1253 pt mea Step: 5321 5,226.00 125,424.00
General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch-Annual3.rpt Page 34 of 34

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 46, Packet Page 109 5/13/2025 CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9373 ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT rpt rpt 673Step: 1 30.30 673
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 2 31.81
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 3 33.42
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 4 35.08
9373 rpt rpt 673Step: 5 36.85
9329 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT rpt rpt 643Step: 1 27.47 643 9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 2 28.84
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 3 30.29
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 4 31.81
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 5 33.42
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 6 35.08
9329 rpt rpt 643Step: 7 36.85
9320 ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK ptsn pt 724Step: 1 21.02 724
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 2 22.07
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 3 23.17
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 4 24.33
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 5 25.55
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 6 26.83
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 7 28.17
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 8 29.58
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 9 31.06
9320 ptsn pt 724Step: 10 32.61
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 1 of 23

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 47, Packet Page 110 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9523 AQUATICS SPECIALIST ptsn pt 579Step: 23 17.00 579
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 24 17.25
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 25 17.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 26 17.75
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 27 18.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 28 18.25
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 29 18.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 30 18.75
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 31 19.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 32 19.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 33 20.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 34 20.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 35 21.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 36 21.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 37 22.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 38 22.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 39 23.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 40 23.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 41 24.00
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 42 24.50
9523 ptsn pt 579Step: 43 25.00
9999 AQUATICS SPECIALIST I ptrpt 000Step: 1 21.87 475
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 2 22.96
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 3 24.11
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 4 25.32
9999 ptrpt 000Step: 5 26.61
9534 ARTIFACT SPECIALIST ptpts 434Step: 1 19.39 434
9534 ptpts 434Step: 2 20.36
9534 ptpts 434Step: 3 21.38
9534 ptpts 434Step: 4 22.45
9534 ptpts 434Step: 5 23.57
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 2 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 48, Packet Page 111 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9545 CAMP COOK ptsn pt 542Step: 13 18.00 542
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 14 18.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 15 18.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 16 18.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 17 19.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 18 19.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 19 19.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 20 19.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 21 20.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 22 20.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 23 20.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 24 20.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 25 21.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 26 21.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 27 21.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 28 21.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 29 22.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 30 22.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 31 22.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 32 22.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 33 23.00
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 34 23.25
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 35 23.50
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 36 23.75
9545 ptsn pt 542Step: 37 24.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 3 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 49, Packet Page 112 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9535 CAMP DIRECTOR/ASSIST CAMP DIR ptsn pt 605Step: 13 19.00 605 9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 14 19.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 15 19.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 16 19.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 17 20.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 18 20.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 19 20.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 20 20.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 21 21.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 22 21.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 23 21.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 24 21.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 25 22.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 26 22.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 27 22.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 28 22.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 29 23.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 30 23.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 31 23.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 32 23.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 33 24.00
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 34 24.25
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 35 24.50
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 36 24.75
9535 ptsn pt 605Step: 37 25.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 4 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 50, Packet Page 113 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9243 COMMUNITY SVC OFFICER INTERN ptsn pt 480Step: 3 17.00 480 9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 4 18.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 5 19.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 6 20.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 7 21.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 8 22.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 9 23.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 10 24.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 11 25.00
9243 ptsn pt 480Step: 12 26.00
CULTURAL ARTS ASSISTANT rpt Step: 1 29.49 639
rpt Step: 2 30.97
rpt Step: 3 32.52
rpt Step: 4 34.14
rpt Step: 5 35.88
9339 CUSTODIAN rpt rpt 471Step: 1 23.71 471
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 2 24.93
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 3 26.17
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 4 27.49
9339 rpt rpt 471Step: 5 28.88
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 5 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 51, Packet Page 114 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9540 DESK ATTENDANT ptsn pt 583Step: 23 16.50 583
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 24 16.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 25 17.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 26 17.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 27 17.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 28 17.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 29 18.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 30 18.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 31 18.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 32 18.75
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 33 19.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 34 19.25
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 35 19.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 36 20.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 37 20.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 38 21.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 39 21.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 40 22.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 41 22.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 42 23.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 43 23.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 44 24.00
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 45 24.50
9540 ptsn pt 583Step: 46 25.00
9546 EXTRA-HELP RETIRED ANNUITANT ptpts 410Step: 1 16.50 410 9546 ptpts 410Step: 5 78.46
9546 ptpts 410Step: 15 115.45
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 6 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 52, Packet Page 115 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9664 FACILITY ATTENDANT rpt rpt 545Step: 1 30.40 545
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 2 31.96
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 3 33.53
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 4 35.21
9664 rpt rpt 545Step: 5 36.96
9421 FACILITY WORKER ptsn pt 510Step: 1 20.87 510
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 2 21.91
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 3 23.01
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 4 24.16
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 5 25.37
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 6 26.64
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 7 27.97
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 8 29.37
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 9 30.84
9421 ptsn pt 510Step: 10 32.38
9216 FIRE INSPECTOR I ptpts 401Step: 1 32.19 401
9216 ptpts 401Step: 2 33.80
9216 ptpts 401Step: 3 35.49
9216 ptpts 401Step: 4 37.26
9216 ptpts 401Step: 5 39.13
9216 ptpts 401Step: 6 41.08
9216 ptpts 401Step: 7 43.14
9216 ptpts 401Step: 8 45.29
9216 ptpts 401Step: 9 47.56
9216 ptpts 401Step: 10 49.94
9419 GUEST SERVICES ATTENDANT ptsn pt 508Step: 1 23.36 508 9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 2 24.53
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 3 25.75
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 4 27.04
9419 ptsn pt 508Step: 5 28.39
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 7 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 53, Packet Page 116 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9340 HARBOR ATTENDANT ptsn pt 725Step: 1 22.48 725
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 2 23.60
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 3 24.78
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 4 26.02
9340 ptsn pt 725Step: 5 27.32
9615 HARBOR SECURITY WORKER rpt rpt 713Step: 1 31.54 713 9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 2 33.09
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 3 34.78
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 4 36.49
9615 rpt rpt 713Step: 5 38.32
9221 HUMAN RESOURCES TECHNICIAN ptsn pt 447Step: 1 25.81 447 9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 2 27.10
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 3 28.46
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 4 29.88
9221 ptsn pt 447Step: 5 31.37
9413 INTERN ptsn pt 662Step: 3 17.00 662
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 4 18.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 5 19.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 6 20.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 7 21.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 8 22.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 9 23.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 10 24.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 11 25.00
9413 ptsn pt 662Step: 12 26.00
9379 JANITORIAL WORKER ptsn pt 727Step: 1 17.76 727
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 2 18.65
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 3 19.58
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 4 20.56
9379 ptsn pt 727Step: 5 21.59
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 8 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 54, Packet Page 117 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
LAUNDRY ATTENDANT rpt Step: 1 17.36 580
rpt Step: 2 18.18
rpt Step: 3 19.09
rpt Step: 4 20.04
rpt Step: 5 21.05
9526 LEAD PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR rpt rpt 525Step: 1 25.24 525 9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 2 26.48
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 3 27.82
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 4 29.21
9526 rpt rpt 525Step: 5 30.65
LIBRARIAN rpt Step: 1 33.10 546
rpt Step: 2 34.79
rpt Step: 3 36.51
rpt Step: 4 38.35
rpt Step: 5 40.26
9515 LIBRARY ASSISTANT I rpt rpt 547Step: 1 28.09 547
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 2 29.52
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 3 30.97
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 4 32.54
9515 rpt rpt 547Step: 5 34.14
9513 LIBRARY ASSISTANT II rpt rpt 548Step: 1 29.52 548
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 2 30.97
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 3 32.52
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 4 34.14
9513 rpt rpt 548Step: 5 35.88
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 9 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 55, Packet Page 118 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9314 LIBRARY CLERK ptsn pt 716Step: 1 20.03 716
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 2 21.03
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 3 22.08
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 4 23.18
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 5 24.34
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 6 25.56
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 7 26.84
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 8 28.18
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 9 29.59
9314 ptsn pt 716Step: 10 31.07
9311 LIBRARY PAGE ptpts 403Step: 3 16.70 403
9311 ptpts 403Step: 4 17.54
9311 ptpts 403Step: 5 18.42
9311 ptpts 403Step: 6 19.33
9311 ptpts 403Step: 7 20.29
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 10 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 56, Packet Page 119 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9524 LIFEGUARD rpt rpt 492Step: 1 17.75 492
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 2 18.55
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 3 19.54
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 4 20.50
9524 rpt rpt 492Step: 5 21.54
9524 LIFEGUARD ptsn pt 578Step: 22 17.00 578
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 23 17.25
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 24 17.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 25 17.75
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 26 18.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 27 18.25
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 28 18.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 29 18.75
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 30 19.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 31 19.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 32 20.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 33 20.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 34 21.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 35 21.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 36 22.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 37 22.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 38 23.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 39 23.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 40 24.00
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 41 24.50
9524 ptsn pt 578Step: 42 25.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 11 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 57, Packet Page 120 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9315 MAINTENANCE WORKER ptsn pt 717Step: 1 20.87 717
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 2 21.91
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 3 23.01
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 4 24.16
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 5 25.37
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 6 26.64
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 7 27.97
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 8 29.37
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 9 30.84
9315 ptsn pt 717Step: 10 32.38
9350 MILITARY AFFAIRS COORDINATOR ptsn pt 712Step: 1 59.37 712 9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 2 62.34
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 3 65.46
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 4 68.73
9350 ptsn pt 712Step: 5 72.16
9316 MUSEUM ATTENDANT ptsn pt 718Step: 3 16.67 718
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 4 17.51
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 5 18.38
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 6 19.30
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 7 20.27
9316 ptsn pt 718Step: 8 21.28
9342 PARK ASSISTANT ptsn pt 719Step: 1 22.46 719
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 2 23.58
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 3 24.76
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 4 26.00
9342 ptsn pt 719Step: 5 27.30
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 12 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 58, Packet Page 121 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9665 PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER rpt rpt 482Step: 1 31.54 482 9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 2 33.09
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 3 34.78
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 4 36.49
9665 rpt rpt 482Step: 5 38.32
9343 PARKING ENFORCEMENT REPRESENT ptsn pt 720Step: 1 22.48 720 9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 2 23.60
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 3 24.78
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 4 26.02
9343 ptsn pt 720Step: 5 27.32
6619 PARKING FACILITY ATTENDANT ptsn pt 715Step: 2 17.15 715 6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 3 18.00
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 4 18.90
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 5 19.85
6619 ptsn pt 715Step: 6 20.84
9662 PARKING SERVICES REPRESENTATIV rpt rpt 714Step: 1 29.47 714 9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 2 30.96
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 3 32.49
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 4 34.11
9662 rpt rpt 714Step: 5 35.84
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 13 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 59, Packet Page 122 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9582 PERSONAL TRAINER ptsn pt 728Step: 1 20.00 728
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 2 21.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 3 22.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 4 23.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 5 24.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 6 25.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 7 26.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 8 27.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 9 28.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 10 29.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 11 30.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 12 31.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 13 32.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 14 33.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 15 34.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 16 35.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 17 36.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 18 37.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 19 38.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 20 39.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 21 40.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 22 41.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 23 42.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 24 43.00
9582 ptsn pt 728Step: 25 44.00
9518 PHYSICAL THERAPIST rpt rpt 535Step: 1 55.55 535
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 2 58.32
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 3 61.26
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 4 64.30
9518 rpt rpt 535Step: 5 67.52
9313 POLICE RECRUIT ptsn pt 486Step: 1 45.61 486
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 14 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 60, Packet Page 123 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9341 PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 721Step: 5 20.00 721
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 6 20.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 7 20.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 8 20.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 9 21.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 10 21.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 11 21.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 12 21.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 13 22.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 14 22.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 15 22.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 16 22.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 17 23.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 18 23.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 19 23.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 20 23.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 21 24.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 22 24.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 23 24.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 24 24.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 25 25.00
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 26 25.25
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 27 25.50
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 28 25.75
9341 ptsn pt 721Step: 29 26.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 15 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 61, Packet Page 124 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9422 RECREATION ASSISTANT ptsn pt 722Step: 1 20.00 722
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 2 21.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 3 22.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 4 23.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 5 24.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 6 25.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 7 26.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 8 27.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 9 28.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 10 29.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 11 30.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 12 31.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 13 32.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 14 33.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 15 34.00
9422 ptsn pt 722Step: 16 35.00
9528 RECREATION SPECIALIST rpt rpt 476Step: 1 27.32 476 9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 2 28.69
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 3 30.13
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 4 31.64
9528 rpt rpt 476Step: 5 33.25
9321 REFERENCE/CHILDRENS LIBRARIAN ptsn pt 723Step: 1 27.37 723 9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 2 28.74
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 3 30.18
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 4 31.69
9321 ptsn pt 723Step: 5 33.27
9411 RESERVE POLICE OFFICER ptpts 412Step: 1 50.19 412
9411 ptpts 412Step: 2 52.70
9411 ptpts 412Step: 3 55.33
9411 ptpts 412Step: 4 58.10
9411 ptpts 412Step: 5 61.01
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 16 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 62, Packet Page 125 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9416 SENIOR AQUATICS SPECIALIST ptsn pt 505Step: 1 34.35 505 9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 2 36.07
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 3 37.87
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 4 39.76
9416 ptsn pt 505Step: 5 41.75
9417 SENIOR FACILITY SPECIALIST ptsn pt 506Step: 1 34.35 506 9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 2 36.07
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 3 37.87
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 4 39.76
9417 ptsn pt 506Step: 5 41.75
9519 SITE DIRECTOR/AFTERSCHOOL rpt rpt 513Step: 1 19.80 513 9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 2 20.80
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 3 21.85
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 4 22.92
9519 rpt rpt 513Step: 5 24.09
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 17 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 63, Packet Page 126 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 617Step: 1 20.00 617 9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 2 21.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 3 22.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 4 23.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 5 24.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 6 25.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 7 26.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 8 27.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 9 28.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 10 29.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 11 30.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 12 31.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 13 32.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 14 33.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 15 34.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 16 35.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 17 36.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 18 37.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 19 38.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 20 39.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 21 40.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 22 41.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 23 42.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 24 43.00
9530 ptsn pt 617Step: 25 44.00
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 619Step: 1 45.00 619 9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 2 46.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 3 47.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 4 48.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 5 49.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 6 50.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 7 51.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 18 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 64, Packet Page 127 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9530 SPECIALTY CLASS INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 619Step: 8 52.00 619 9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 9 53.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 10 54.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 11 55.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 12 56.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 13 57.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 14 58.00
9530 ptsn pt 619Step: 15 59.00
9537 SPORTS OFFICIAL ptsn pt 560Step: 1 17.00 560
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 2 18.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 3 19.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 4 20.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 5 21.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 6 22.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 7 23.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 8 24.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 9 25.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 10 26.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 11 27.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 12 28.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 13 29.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 14 30.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 15 31.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 16 32.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 17 33.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 18 34.00
9537 ptsn pt 560Step: 19 35.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 19 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 65, Packet Page 128 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9548 SR REC LEADER/REC LEADER ptsn pt 729Step: 13 18.00 729 9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 14 18.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 15 18.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 16 18.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 17 19.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 18 19.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 19 19.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 20 19.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 21 20.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 22 20.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 23 20.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 24 20.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 25 21.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 26 21.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 27 21.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 28 21.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 29 22.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 30 22.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 31 22.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 32 22.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 33 23.00
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 34 23.25
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 35 23.50
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 36 23.75
9548 ptsn pt 729Step: 37 24.00
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 20 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 66, Packet Page 129 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9322 SUPPORT ANALYST ptsn pt 726Step: 1 33.98 726
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 2 35.68
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 3 37.46
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 4 39.34
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 5 41.30
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 6 43.37
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 7 45.54
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 8 47.81
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 9 50.20
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 10 52.71
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 11 55.35
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 12 58.12
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 13 61.02
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 14 64.07
9322 ptsn pt 726Step: 15 67.28
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 21 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 67, Packet Page 130 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9527 SUPPORT PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTOR ptsn pt 502Step: 19 17.50 502 9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 20 17.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 21 18.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 22 18.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 23 18.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 24 18.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 25 19.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 26 19.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 27 19.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 28 19.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 29 20.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 30 20.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 31 20.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 32 20.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 33 21.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 34 21.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 35 21.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 36 21.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 37 22.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 38 22.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 39 22.50
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 40 22.75
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 41 23.00
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 42 23.25
9527 ptsn pt 502Step: 43 23.50
TOT ACTIVITY LEADER rpt Step: 1 19.80 491
rpt Step: 2 20.80
rpt Step: 3 21.85
rpt Step: 4 22.92
rpt Step: 5 24.09
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 22 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 68, Packet Page 131 5/13/2025
POS # POSITION TITLE GRADE Group
9831 WHARF ATTENDANT ptpts 705Step: 1 21.51 705
9831 ptpts 705Step: 2 22.59
9831 ptpts 705Step: 3 23.71
9831 ptpts 705Step: 4 24.90
9831 ptpts 705Step: 5 26.15
9716 WHARF ATTENDANT rpt rpt 707Step: 1 29.31 707
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 2 30.75
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 3 32.28
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 4 33.90
9716 rpt rpt 707Step: 5 35.61
roll\402-01-Payroll General Info\SALARY SCHEDULES\SalarySch Part-time.rpt Page 23 of 23

CITY OF MONTEREY PART-TIME HOURLY SCHEDULE
Effective 7/01/2025 Through 6/30/2026

EXHIBIT B
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 69, Packet Page 132

CLASS SPECIFICATION

DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY I/II
DEPARTMENT: City Attorney’s Office DATE: July 2025
SALARY GROUP: Full-Time
FLSA Status: Exempt
SUMMARY:

Under the supervision of the City Attorney or Assistant City Attorney, provides a wide range of professional legal services to the City Council, City Manager, City departments, and Boards and Commissions. Deputy City Attorney I is an entry-level professional position requiring no prior legal experience. Deputy City Attorney II performs more complex legal assignments with increased independence and may represent the City in trials, hearings, and administrative proceedings as the lead attorney/first chair while the Deputy City Attorney I assists the lead attorney.

DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS:

Deputy City Attorney I is the entry-level classification in the Deputy City Attorney series. Incumbents work under close supervision while learning to apply legal principles and practices in a municipal setting. This classification is designed for recent State Bar of California admittees or attorneys with minimal experience and serves as a training ground for promotion to the II level.

Deputy City Attorney II is the journey-level classification, expected to perform a broader range of duties with greater independence and less supervision. Incumbents at this level may independently handle litigation, legal research, contract negotiation, and advisory matters.

ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS: Essential functions, as defined under the Americans with Disabilities Act, may include any of the following representative duties, knowledge, and skills. Factors such as regular attendance at the job are not routinely listed in job descriptions, but are an essential function. Essential duties and responsibilities may include, but are not limited to, the following:
● Resolve legal issues within City policy guidelines; research and evaluate pertinent decisions, policies, regulations, claims, civil actions, and other legal matters; assure effective communication of issues and strategies with the City Attorney and Assistant City Attorney. ● Prepare written or oral opinions on various legal issues for the City Attorney, Assistant City Attorney, City Manager, Council, and City departments.
● Provide legal advice and counsel to City officials, boards, commissions, and City staff on a variety of legal matters.
● Assist with case preparation and resolution of litigation, negotiations, settlements, prosecutions, and other municipal legal proceedings within scope of authority; develop legal assessments and strategies under the direction or guidance of the Assistant City Attorney; conduct factual and legal analysis to determine whether legal issues should be prosecuted or defended, based on the facts of law and evidence; conduct conferences with opposing parties concerning case management and settlement of cases. ● Negotiate, draft, and review contracts; develop drafts of resolutions, ordinances, and proposed legislation; represents the City in civil, criminal, and administrative hearings. ● Assist Code Enforcement to prepare code violation cases for hearing or prosecution. ● Review meeting agenda items, attend public meetings to provide legal advice and information, and present findings, recommendations, and effective solutions.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 70, Packet Page 133 Deputy City Attorney I/II City of Monterey, CA 2 of 3
● Exercise independent judgment within policy guidelines; recognize and analyze potential liability and legal issues, evaluate complex legal issues, and recommend and implement solutions to minimize risk and safeguard the City’s operations.
● Monitor changes in state and federal regulations, standards, and legislation governing municipalities. ● Support the relationship between the City of Monterey and the general public by demonstrating courteous and cooperative behavior when interacting with residents, visitors, and City staff. ● Maintain confidentiality of work-related issues and City information. ● Perform other job-related duties within the scope of this job classification as assigned.

KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS:

Knowledge of:
● City organization, operations, policies, and procedures. ● How to obtain and interpret legal precedents and court decisions impacting municipal government. ● Legal research methods, techniques, sources, databases, and other research tools. ● Principles and protocols for the evidentiary gathering of information, documents, financial records, and other data that may be used in court and legal hearings. ● Principles and practices of legal, ethical, and professional rules of conduct. ● Office procedures and equipment, including computers and specialized software applications.

Skill in:
● Analyzing legal, administrative, and operational data and issues, interpreting laws and regulations, evaluating alternatives, and developing strategies for effective resolution of issues. ● Representing the City in legal hearings and negotiations. ● Effectively assessing, interpreting, and applying laws to information, evidence, and other data compiled.
● Evaluating technical and legal documents, and evaluating compliance with regulatory requirements and municipal government activities.
● Explaining City policies and procedures while exercising the highest degree of confidentiality. ● Exercising judgment and discretion, negotiating agreements, and mediating difficult situations. ● Establishing and maintaining cooperative working relationships with employees, officials, other government agencies and the general public.
● Assessing and prioritizing multiple tasks, projects and demands. ● Strong oral communication and advocacy skills.
● Communicating knowledge clearly and concisely to staff in writing.

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS:

Deputy City Attorney I:
• Education: Completion of Juris Doctor Degree from an American Bar Association accredited law school. • Experience: No prior legal experience required; experience in government or municipal law (e.g., internships, clerkships) is desirable.

Deputy City Attorney II:
• Education: Completion of Juris Doctor Degree from an American Bar Association accredited law school; consideration of graduates from non-ABA accredited law schools that have been accredited by the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of California will be given based on experience. • Experience: Three (3) years’ experience in the practice of law. Government legal practice and courtroom experience is preferred.

An equivalent combination of education and experience may be considered.

LICENSE AND CERTIFICATION:

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 71, Packet Page 134 Deputy City Attorney I/II City of Monterey, CA 3 of 3
● Must possess a valid California Driver’s License upon time of appointment and be insurable with the City’s standard insurance rate, unless otherwise approved by appointing authority. ● Must be a member of the California State Bar Association, licensed to practice law in the state, and remain active with all California Bar annual requirements.

PHYSICAL DEMANDS AND WORKING ENVIRONMENT:

Physical Demands
● Standing & Walking – Primarily sedentary classification although standing in work areas and walking between work areas may be required.
● Sitting - Ability to work in a seated position at a computer station for extended periods of time. ● Lifting - Ability to safely lift up 20 pounds to waist level; these requirements include bending at knees to facilitate proper lifting techniques.
● Manual Dexterity - Ability to perform multiple work activities requiring a significant level of physical and mental coordination, such as operating a computer keyboard; copying, and adding machines. ● Visual – Ability to read printed materials and view a computer screen for long periods. ● Hearing and Speech - Ability to communicate in person, before groups, and over the telephone. ● Mobility – Ability to work in a standard office setting and operate a motor vehicle to visit various meeting sites, reach, carry, push, pull, stoop, and bend.

Environmental Elements
Employees work in an office environment with moderate noise levels, controlled temperature conditions and no direct exposure to hazardous physical substances. Employees may interact with upset staff and/or public and private representatives in interpreting and enforcing departmental policies and procedures.

DISASTER SERVICE WORKERS
All City of Monterey employees are designated Disaster Service Workers through state and local law (California Government Code Section 3100-3109). Employment with the City requires the affirmation of a loyalty oath to this effect. Employees are required to complete all Disaster Service Worker-related training as assigned, and to return to work as ordered in the event of an emergency.

ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 7., Item Page 72, Packet Page 135 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Levi Hill, AICP, Planning Manager
Prepared By: Fernanda Roveri, AICP, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Adopt the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Recommendations to Approve 1st Reading of an Ordinance to Rezone 817 Martin Street from R-1-15 to R-1-15-H-2 as a City Historic Resource and Authorize a Mills Act Contract (Property Tax Savings Program for Historic Structures) (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:

1. Pass a first reading of an ordinance to rezone 817
Martin Street from R-1-15 to R-1-15-H-2 as a City
Historic Resource; and

2. Adopt a resolution authorizing a Mills Act Contract
(property tax savings program for historic structures)
for 817 Martin Street.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Preserve, promote, and maintain our City’s historic and cultural resources through responsible stewardship and
historic preservation that highlights the contributions and perspectives of all people who are a part of Monterey’s diverse history.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey is one of the most historic cities in the United States. The Council has placed value in the
preservation of historic resources and made it a goal in the Historic Preservation Element. One of the ways this goal is achieved is through the implementation of Historic
Preservation Element Program a.1.7, which states:
“Maintain and update the City’s historic incentive programs to support historic property owners, including grant
programs, land use incentives, flexible zoning and parking standards, property tax relief, Historic Building Code, and expedited processing for historic resources.”
H-2 zoning is intended to identify and protect historic resources in the City that would be recognized as resources of local historic importance, and their significance would not be generally recognized outside the immediate area of the Monterey Peninsula.

Agenda Report Highlights
 The City Council is
recommended to rezone 817
Martin Street to R-1-15-H-2 as
a City Historic Resource and
approve a Mills Act Contract to
preserve the historic property.
 The Bruguiere Cottage qualifies
as a local historic resource, due
to its architectural design and
its association with significant
persons.
 The Mills Act Contract provides
property tax savings to offset
maintenance costs, which
include comprehensive repairs
to the property, ensuring that its
preservation aligns with official
standards for historical
properties.
 The Historic Preservation
Commission and Planning
Commission have reviewed
and recommended approval of
the rezoning and Mills Act
Contract.

Date: 8/19/2025
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 136 №11/25
Mills Act contracts provide property tax savings to property owners to offset the additional maintenance costs associated with ownership of a historic property. Through the contract, the City is assured that the historic property will be maintained.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: Yes.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

Each property owner pays approximately 1% annually of the assessed value of their property in property taxes and approximately 20% of those property taxes are passed through to the City.

Most Mills Act contract properties recognize 40-60% savings in taxes, depending on how the County Assessor estimates the site’s rental rate.

The following chart represents the approximate reduction in property taxes that would be passed to the City under the Mills Act:

Property Address Standard Property
Tax
Standard Tax Passed
to City (20%)
Mills Act Rate Tax
Passed to City (40-
60% Reduction)
817 Martin Street $19,750 $3,950 $1,580-$2,370
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5) because the addition of H-2 overlay zoning to the property will not result in significant changes to land use limitations and will maintain a designated historic building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Mills Act contracts require that all work performed subsequent to entering into a contract is consistent with those standards.

Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would not impact a resource of critical concern. The project proposes maintenance of a historic building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. The project would have a positive impact in that a historic resource would be maintained. The environment is not particularly sensitive (existing building and paved areas).

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The project proposes maintenance of a building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. No cumulative impacts would occur.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances exist at the site. The building is an Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 137 №11/25
existing structure and the surrounding environment is an established residential area. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The project proposes to maintain the structure consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Therefore, a significant effect would not occur.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project proposes maintenance of a building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. The property is not located on or viewable from a state scenic highway. Therefore, impacts to scenic highways would not occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The project site is not listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. There would be no impacts related to hazardous waste sites.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The building is eligible as a local historic resource and the addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The building maintenance would be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The project would not cause an adverse change to the historic resource.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to rezone or approve the Mills Act contract for the property.

DISCUSSION:

Background
The owner of the “Bruguiere Cottage”, a two-story wood-framed residence located at 817 Martin Street, requested H-2 (City Historic Resource) overlay zoning and to enter into a Mills Act Contract with the City of Monterey. As required by Monterey City Code, an intensive historic survey and a detailed maintenance schedule that covers the life of the contract were submitted as part of the application.

H-2 Overlay Zoning
To qualify for H-2 overlay zoning, an Intensive Survey prepared by or under supervision of a Qualified Professional shall find that the property meets one or more National Register or California Register Criteria. The Criteria are generally described as historic event, person, design, or information potential. According to the Intensive Survey prepared by Qualified Professional Kent Seavey, the “Bruguiere Cottage” at 817 Martin Street qualifies as a local historic resource based on Criteria 2 and 3:
 Criterion 2: The resource is associated with the lives of significant persons in Monterey's history.

The residence is significant under California Register Criterion 2 for its association with the four families who owned and resided in the residence, sequentially between c.1909 and 1969, Bruguiere, McAulay, Snook, and Powers, and their collective contributions to the civic and Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 138 №11/25
cultural development of Monterey in the areas of residential development, medical innovation, and architectural and visitor serving excellence over time while in the “Bruguiere Cottage”.  Criterion 3: The resource embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction.

The residence is significant under California Register Criterion 3 as a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction, specifically as a good and interesting example of architectural design from the mid1910s. The two-story, wood-framed residence, asymmetric in plan, and eclectic in design, reflects both Vernacular and Monterey Colonial elements in its composition and detailing.

Figures 1 and 2: Photographs of the property at 817 Martin Street

The “Bruguiere Cottage” was designed under the direction of Adel Shortridge Bruguiere, wife of Emile Bruguiere, developer of Bruguiere Park, a 50-lot residential subdivision in Monterey’s Doud Tract. Bruguiere Cottage was Bruguiere Park’s first home c. 1905. The Bruguiere Gates (pictured below) marked the entrance to the estate prior to its subdivision and remain today on Colton Street, near Alameda Street. The property retains all seven aspects of integrity, including, location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association.

Figure 3: Photograph of the Bruguiere Gates in current form Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 139 №11/25
Mills Act Contract
A Mills Act Contract is an agreement between the City of Monterey and the property owner of a City-designated historic building. The owner benefits from a reduction in property taxes and the City is assured that the historic building will be preserved. The Contract requires that the historic building be maintained in good condition and includes the following conditions of approval:

1. An identification plaque shall be installed describing the building as an historic resource. The plaque text, design, and materials shall be approved by the Planning Division prior to installation;

2. The building shall be made available for an annual tour; and,

3. The property owner shall maintain the property in good general repair and make any or all repairs as necessary. The roof, exterior and interior walls, and electrical and plumbing systems will be inspected on a regular basis.

The owner has agreed to all the above conditions.

Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Recommendations On July 10, 2025, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) reviewed the historic zoning and Mills Act proposal. After discussion, the HPC voted to recommend that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the historic zoning and associated Mills Act contract.

On July 22, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the historic zoning proposal. After discussion, the Planning Commission voted to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance rezoning the property at 817 Martin Street from R-1-15 to R-1-15-H-2 as a City Historic Resource.

Analysis
As required by Monterey City Code, an Intensive Survey and a detailed maintenance schedule that covers the life of the Mills Act Contract were submitted as part of the application. The property meets the eligibility requirements for H-2 overlay zoning and the Mills Act Program in that the property has been identified by a Qualified Professional to be a significant local historic resource and that granting the contract will serve to offset the costs of maintaining the resource.

The maintenance schedule proposes repairs to all aspects of the property, including but not limited to roofing, chimney, siding, windows, doors, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and outdoor areas.

In conclusion, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission recommendations to:

1. Pass a first reading of an ordinance to rezone 817 Martin Street from R-1-15 to R-1-15- H-2 as a City Historic Resource; and

2. Adopt a resolution authorizing a Mills Act Contract (property tax savings program for historic structures) for 817 Martin Street.

KC/LH/fr
Attachments: 1. Ordinance with Exhibit A (Map)

2. Resolution Authorizing Mills Act Contract with Exhibit A (Legal Description) and Exhibit B (Maintenance Schedule)

3. Intensive Survey
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 140 №11/25
e: Gregory Bernard, Applicant, [email protected]
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 6, Packet Page 141 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/24
REZONING THE PROPERTY AT 817 MARTIN STREET AS A CITY HISTORIC RESOURCE FROM R-1-15 TO R-1-15-H-2
THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, Gregory Bernard, applicant, on behalf of Gregory Michael Bernard and Jessica Rae Bernard, owner, requested that 817 Martin Street receive H-2 (City Historic Resource) overlay zoning (Exhibit A);
WHEREAS, adoption of H-2 overlay zoning requires the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) to recommend to the Planning Commission (PC) to recommend to the City Council to adopt an ordinance rezoning the property;
WHEREAS, as required by Monterey City Code, an Intensive Survey (DPR 523B form) prepared by a Qualified Professional was submitted as part of the application, and it concludes that the subject property qualifies as a local historic resource.

WHEREAS, the subject property is significant under California Register Criterion 2 for its association with the four families who owned and resided in the residence, sequentially between c.1909 and 1969, Bruguiere, McAulay, Snook, and Powers, and their collective contributions to the civic and cultural development of Monterey in the areas of residential development, medical innovation, and architectural and visitor serving excellence over time while in the “Bruguiere Cottage”;
WHEREAS, the subject property is also significant under California Register Criterion 3 as a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction, specifically as a good and interesting example of architectural design from the mid1910s. The two-story, wood-framed residence, asymmetric in plan, and eclectic in design, reflects both Vernacular and Monterey Colonial elements in its composition and detailing. The “Bruguiere Cottage” was designed under the direction of Adel Shortridge Bruguiere, wife of Emile Bruguiere, developer of Bruguiere Park, a 50-lot residential subdivision in Monterey’s Doud Tract. Bruguiere Cottage was Bruguiere Park’s first home c. 1905. The property retains all seven aspects of integrity, including, location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association;
WHEREAS, the HPC, at a property noticed public hearing on July 10, 2025, carefully considered all of the information presented to it, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons, and adopted a resolution recommending that the PC recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance rezoning the property; WHEREAS, the PC, at a properly noticed public hearing on July 22, 2025, carefully considered all of the information presented to it, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons, and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt an ordinance rezoning the property; Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 7, Packet Page 142 WHEREAS, the City Council, at a properly noticed public hearing on August 19, 2025, carefully considered all of the information presented, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons; and, WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5) because the addition of H-2 overlay zoning to the property will not result in significant changes to land use limitations and will maintain a designated historic building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Mills Act contracts require that all work performed subsequent to entering into a contract is consistent with those standards. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would not impact a resource of critical concern. The project proposes maintenance of a historic building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. The project would have a positive impact in that a historic resource would be maintained. The environment is not particularly sensitive (existing building and paved areas).

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The project proposes maintenance of a building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. No cumulative impacts would occur.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances exist at the site. The building is an existing structure and the surrounding environment is an established residential area. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The project proposes to maintain the structure consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Therefore, a significant effect would not occur.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project proposes maintenance of a building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. The property is not located on or viewable from a state scenic highway. Therefore, impacts to scenic highways would not occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The project site is not listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The project would have no impact to hazardous waste sites.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 8, Packet Page 143 Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The building is eligible as a local historic resource and the addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The building maintenance would be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. The project would not cause an adverse change to the historic resource.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: The property at 817 Martin Street is hereby rezoned from R-1-15 to R-1-15- H-2, as shown in Exhibit A.

SECTION 4: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 5: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 19th day of August, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 9, Packet Page 144

EXHIBIT A
817 Martin Street
Subject property
Rezoning from R-1-15
to R-1-15-H-2
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 10, Packet Page 145 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AUTHORIZING A MILLS ACT CONTRACT FOR THE PROPERTY
AT 817 MARTIN STREET
WHEREAS, Gregory Bernard, applicant, on behalf of Gregory Michael Bernard and Jessica Rae Bernard, owner, submitted the required application and information to enter the property located at 817 Martin Street into a Mills Act Contract with the City of Monterey, including a detailed legal description (Exhibit A) and maintenance schedule that covers the life of the Contract (Exhibit B);
WHEREAS, a Mills Act Contract is an agreement between the City of Monterey and the property owner of a City-designated historic building;
WHEREAS, the property owner benefits from a reduction in property taxes and the City is ensured that the historic building will be preserved; WHEREAS, granting the contract will serve to offset the costs of maintaining the resource;
WHEREAS, the City could expect to receive reduced tax revenue as a result of the Mills Act Contract in the amount of approximately $1,580-$2,370 annually; WHEREAS, the HPC, at a property noticed public hearing on July 10, 2025, carefully considered all of the information presented to it, including the agenda report and information submitted at the public hearing by interested persons, and adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the Mills Act Contract;
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that 817 Martin Street meets the eligibility requirements for the Mills Act Program in that it meets the eligibility requirements for H-2 overlay zoning, and the property owner has applied to rezone the property, and granting the Contract will serve to offset the costs of maintaining the resource; WHEREAS, the authorization of the Mills Act Contract will be in effect 30 days after City Council approval of the associated rezone; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15305, Class 5) because the addition of H-2 overlay zoning to the property will not result in significant changes to land use limitations and will maintain a designated historic building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. Mills Act contracts require that all work performed subsequent to entering into a contract is consistent with those standards. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 11, Packet Page 146 may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would not impact a resource of critical concern. The project proposes maintenance of a historic building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. The project would have a positive impact in that a historic resource would be maintained. The environment is not particularly sensitive (existing building and paved areas).

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The project proposes maintenance of a building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. No cumulative impacts would occur.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances exist at the site. The building is an existing structure and the surrounding environment is an established residential area. The addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The project proposes to maintain the structure consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Therefore, a significant effect would not occur.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project proposes maintenance of a building consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards. The property is not located on or viewable from a state scenic highway. Therefore, impacts to scenic highways would not occur.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The project site is not listed pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The project would have no impact to hazardous waste sites.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The building is eligible as a local historic resource and the addition of H-2 overlay zoning would add an additional layer of protection to the resource. The building maintenance would be consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 12, Packet Page 147

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby authorizes a Mills Act Contract for the property at 817 Martin Street, with Exhibit A (Legal Description) and Exhibit B (Maintenance Schedule) attached hereto.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this 19th day of August, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 13, Packet Page 148 EXHIBIT 1
The Land Referred to is situated in the County of Monterey, City of Monterey, State of California and is described as follows:

Parcel A in the City of Monterey, County of Monterey, State of California as shown on that certain Parcel Map Recorded April 19, 1979 in Volume 13, Page 51 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of said County.

Exhibit A
Council Regular Meeting, 8/19/2025, Item No. 8., Item Page 14, Packet Page 149 interval proposed.

Property Address: 817 Martin St Monterey CA 93940Owner Name: Gregory and Jessica Bernard Note: Dollar amounts will be revised at 10 year intervals and Owner Telephone No: 202-480-9280 adjusted for inflation as appropriate.

Contract Year
Frequency 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031
Exterior
Install Gutter Guards One-time $11,000.00
Repair/Replace Gutters Every 10 years $4,000.00
Inspect and Paint Exterior of house Every 10 years $15,000.00 Replace Roof Every 20 years
Maintenance Yearly $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 Inspect and Repair/Replace Skylights Every 10 years $3,000.00 Rehabilitate exterior Chimneys One-time $44,000.00
Foundation Repair Every 20 years $30,000.00
Interior
Update Plumbing One-time $12,000.00
Update Electrical One-time $14,200.00
Install Hybrid Water Heater One-time $1,500.00
Plumbing Maintenance Every 2 years $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Upgrade Panel One-time $4,000.00
Knob and Tube Replacement One-time $500.00
Electrical Maintenance Every 2 years $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Install Heat Pump upstairs One-time $15,300.00 $7,000.00 Install Heat Pump downstairs One-time $15,500.00
Repair/Replace HVAC Ducting Every 20 years $8,000.00
Install Dryer Vent One-time $1,500.00
Fireplace Inspection/Maintenance Yearly $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 $350.00 Windows/Doors
Repair/Replace Wood Windows One-time $7,000.00
Maintenance Every 2 years $200.00 $200.00 $200.00
1st floor bedroom window replacement One-time $7,000.00 sunroom glass replacement One-time $1,250.00
garage door maintenance Every 2 years $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 $600.00 Grounds
Rehabilitate Gardens One-time $10,000.00
Garden Bed maintence Yearly $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Inspect French drain & repair as needed 5 years $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Rehabilitate Garden Pond/River One-time $11,000.00
Rehabilitate rear garden walking paths One-time $5,000.00 Paint Deck, Repair/Replace Rot Every 2 years $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Misc.

Termite Inspection and Treatment Every 5 years $14,000.00 $14,000.00 ANNUAL TOTAL $174,700.00 $33,850.00 $49,650.00 $33,850.00 $12,650.00 $28,850.00 $12,650.00RUNNING TOTAL $208,550.00 $258,200.00 $292,050.00 $304,700.00 $333,550.00 $346,200.00 City of Monterey Note: Frequency of repairs continues beyond 2038 based on Mills Act Maintenance Schedule