Agenda packet — Monterey City Council, February 3, 2026

Council Chamber
580 Pacific St.

Monterey, California

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
Council Regular Meeting and
Closed Session
Tuesday, February 3, 2026
4:00 PM
Afternoon Only
Mayor
Tyller Williamson
Councilmembers
Kim Barber, District 1
Ed Smith, District 2
Jean Rasch, District 3
Gino Garcia, District 4
Interim City Manager
Lew Bauman
City Attorney
M. Christine Davi
HOW TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING:
• In-Person: At the meeting location listed above.
• Remotely via ZoomGov webinar:
o On a computer or smartphone: https://monterey-org.zoomgov.com/j/1607729333 Zoom software must be up-to-date. For help, please use our Zoom Meeting Instructions. o By telephone dial 833-568-8864 (Toll Free), 669-254-5252 (CA) or 646-828-7666 (NY). If one number doesn’t work, please try another. Enter Webinar ID: 160 772 9333 # If asked for participant ID, press #. To raise your hand (or lower it), dial *9. Once called upon, dial *6 to unmute.
• This meeting will also stream live for viewing only on youtube.com/cityofmonterey (~10 second delay) and on Comcast Channel 25 (up to 90 second delay). • Written comment: Emailed comments to [email protected] sent no later than ½ hour before the start of the meeting (sooner preferred) are not read aloud but are made available to the Council and public at monterey.gov/submitted-comments.

PUBLIC COMMENT PROCEDURES AND TIME LIMITS:

The total amount of time allocated for public comment on a particular issue and for each individual speaker is generally as follows:

1. Up to three minutes per speaker.

2. For regular City Council meetings, there are two 15-minute public comment periods, one in the afternoon and one in the evening. Speakers may only comment during one session.

3. The total time allocated for public comment:
a. 30 minutes per item – Public Appearance and Public Hearing items b. 15 minutes per item – All other items (including, but not limited to, Consent, Closed Session, Presentations, and Requests to Agendize)
At the time an item is considered, the Mayor will ask those attending the meeting in person to line up at the podium or raise their hands, and for remote participants to use *9 on the telephone or the “raise hand” function in Zoom, if they wish to address the City Council. The maximum amount of time for each person to speak and the total amount of time allotted for each item will be determined based on the number of people indicating an interest in speaking and the amount of business to be conducted on the agenda. In exceptional circumstances and when necessary to ensure a full opportunity for public input, the Mayor may, with the legislative body’s consent, adjust the amount of time allowed for public input and/or the time allotted for each speaker.

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to the Levine Act (Govt. Code §84308), any party to a permit, license, contract, or other entitlement before the Council is required to disclose on the record any contribution, including aggregated contributions, of more than $500 made by the party or the party's agents within the preceding 12 months to any City official. Participants and agents are requested to make this disclosure as well. The disclosure must include the name of the party, participant, or agent, and any other person making the contribution; the name of the recipient, the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made.

February 3, 2026 4:00 PM
2 Call to Order
Pledge of Allegiance
AFTERNOON SESSION: 4:00 p.m.

Presentations (Afternoon)

1. Recognize February 2026 as Black History Month (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

2. Receive a Presentation Introducing Nicole Banks as the City’s New Parks and Recreation Director (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
General Public Comments
The public may speak to any item that is not on the agenda and that is in the City of Monterey’s subject matter jurisdiction.

Consent Agenda
All matters listed under Consent Agenda are routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the City Council or the public requests discussion or a separate vote.

Consent: Approval of Minutes

3. January 20, 2026 Regular Meeting (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

4. January 28, 2026 Special Meeting (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Consent: Award of Construction Contracts

5. Award a Construction Contract in the Amount of $420,095.00 to Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. for the Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Aguajito Sewer Cured-in-Place Pipe (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)

6. Award a Construction Contract to Eaton Corporation in the Amount of $192,950.00 for the Removal and Replacement of 90 Enersys Batteries at Camp Roberts – Project POM 25-011 ***IGSA*** (Categorically Excluded from NEPA 32 CFR, Part 651, Section II(g)(1) (CEQA Not a Project))
Consent: Ordinances
An ordinance is a law adopted by the City Council and codified in the City Code. Through the adoption of an ordinance, the City may make and enforce within its limits all local, police, sanitary, and other laws not in conflict with state or federal law. An ordinance generally becomes effective 30 days after approval at a second reading.

7. 2nd Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 31 of the Monterey City Code to add a Ten-Foot Spacing Requirement between Temporary Signs on Private Property (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3)
February 3, 2026 4:00 PM
3 Consent: Resolutions
A resolution is an expression of opinion or evidence of a decision made by the City Council and often relates to administrative business of the City. Resolutions generally become effective immediately upon adoption.

8. Award a Job Order Contract in the Amount of $150,000 to Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. for Presidio of Monterey Pest Control Services ***IGSA*** (Categorically Excluded from NEPA 32 CFR, Part 651, Section II(g)(1) (CEQA Not a Project))

9. Order Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Alvarado Street Maintenance District No. 85-1 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

10. Order Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Calle Principal Maintenance District No. 00-1 (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

11. Award a Contract to ComSonics, Inc. for the Purchase of an Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Camera System and Associated Software and Services for the Parking Division in an Amount Not to Exceed $182,255.27 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Consent: Other

12. Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 160 Municipal Wharf #2 and Approximately 3,238 Square Feet of Area Located Under the Wharf #2 Warehouse; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Art Seavey and Amanda Fay (Monterey Abalone Company); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) End of Consent Agenda
Afternoon Session Items
Public Appearance (Afternoon)
Public Appearance items are on non-routine issues that might stimulate public interest and comments.

13. Appoint Dante G. Hall as City Manager, Approve Employment Contract, and Amend the City’s Full-Time Salary Schedule (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

14. Authorize the City Manager or Designee to Execute an Agreement with the Monterey County Office of Education for an Amount Not to Exceed $120,668.40 for Production and Broadcast Services (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Council Comments
Councilmembers may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on their activities. In addition, Councilmember or the City Council may provide a referral to staff or other resources for factual information. (Government Code section 54954.2(a)(3).)
February 3, 2026 4:00 PM
4 City Manager Reports
The City Manager may make a brief report on their activities or a brief announcement. They may also ask for clarification or direction regarding scheduling of Council meetings and study sessions.

Adjourn to Closed Session
The City Council will take public comments on closed session items before convening to closed session.

Closed Session (Afternoon)
Part or all of a meeting may be closed to the public under special conditions. Council can consider only matters covered in the agenda descriptions.

15. Closed Session Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 160 Municipal Wharf #2 and Approximately 3,238 Square Feet of Area Located Under the Wharf #2 Warehouse
Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete
Negotiating Parties: Art Seavey and Amanda Fay (Monterey Abalone Company) Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)

16. Conference with Legal Counsel, Deciding Whether to Initiate Litigation Pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(d)(4) (One Case - Re: Zoning Code Violations at 548 Mar Vista Dr., Monterey, Owned by Desiree Albert, Trustee) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Adjournment
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on these matters within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, are available at: monterey.gov/submitted-comments and in the City Manager’s Office at 580 Pacific St., Room 1, Monterey, CA 93940 during regular business hours. All comments and materials provided to the Council become part of the public record. Members of the public who comment in any fashion on an agenda item may be subject to the Levine Act which requires disclosure of campaign contributions of more than $500 to an officer of the City within the preceding 12 months.

INTERPRETATION: The Monterey City Council invites and encourages public participation at its meetings.

Requests for language interpretation may be made by contacting the City Clerk at [email protected] or 831-646-3935. The City Clerk will make every effort to accommodate requests for interpreter assistance.

Requests should be made as soon as possible in advance of any meeting of the City Council. The City is committed to addressing language interpretation requests swiftly in order to maximize public participation.

ACCESSIBILITY: The City of Monterey is committed to including people with disabilities in all of its services, programs and activities. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, including to coordinate the use of a hearing device, please contact [email protected] or (831) 646-3935. Notification 30+ hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting [28 CFR 35.102-

35.104 ADA Title II]. Later requests will be accommodated to the extent feasible. For communication-related assistance, dial 711 to use the California Relay Service (CRS) to speak to City offices. CRS offers free text-tospeech, speech-to-speech, and Spanish-language services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

CITY OF MONTEREY 24-HOUR SUGGESTION HOTLINES: (831) 646-3799 or [email protected] Upcoming city meetings are listed at monterey.gov/agendas For more information, call (831) 646-3935 Council
Agenda Report
№12/25
FROM: Lew Bauman, Interim City Manager
Prepared By: Hayley Goodwein, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: Recognize February 2026 as Black History Month (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council recognize February 2026 as Black
History Month
VALUE DRIVERS:

Preserve, promote, and maintain our City’s historic and cultural resources through responsible stewardship and
historic preservation that highlights the contributions and perspectives of all people who are a part of Monterey’s diverse history.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

The City of Monterey recognizes and celebrates Black
History Month in honor of the culture, accomplishments, and contributions of the African American community in
Monterey and across the United States. The City
proudly supports the continued advancement of equality
for African-American individuals and their families.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no costs incurred in connection with
supporting this action.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to Agenda Report Highlights
• The recommendation to City Council
is to recognize February 2026 as
Black History Month.
• The recognition is designated as an
opportunity to learn about and honor
the culture, accomplishments, and
contributions of the African
American communities in Monterey
and across the United States.
• The Association for the Study of
African American Life and History
announced the 2026 Black History
theme as “A Century of Black
History Commemorations”, as 2026
marks the 100th anniversary of
Negro History Week.
• There are no fiscal or environmental
implications associated with this
recognition.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 1.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 1., Item Page 1, Packet Page 5 №11/25
CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose to not recognize February 2026 as Black History Month, however that is not recommended.

DISCUSSION:

Initially referred to as Negro History Week, the seeds were sown for Black History Month by historian and scholar Carter G. Woodson in the second week of February in 1926 to coincide with the birthdays of Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass. He sought to shed light on the achievements of African Americans that were often overlooked, promote the significant contribution that Black people had made to American society and to encourage them to be proud of their history. Black History Month has been celebrated annually in February since 1976.

The Association for the Study of African American Life and History (ASALH) announced that the 2026 Black History theme is ‘A Century of Black History Commemorations”. The 100th anniversary theme “urge us to explore the impact and meaning of Black history and life commemorations in transforming the status of Black peoples in the modern world”, as described in the ASALH Black History Theme Executive Summary.

The City of Monterey is proud to recognize and celebrate Black History Month. In the face of great adversity, African Americans have made and continue to make a positive, indelible mark on the history of Monterey and the United States. The City also acknowledges that while progress has been made, there is work left to be done. As the ASALH states in their Executive Summary, “to understand the modern world, especially nations where Black peoples form a significant population, one must grapple with the impact that the public observances have had on the past and the present. This year, when we are also commemorating the 250th anniversary of United States independence, it is important to tell not only an inclusive history, but an accurate one. We have never had more need to examine the role of Black History Month than we do when forces weary of democracy seek to use legislative means and book bans to excise Black history from America’s schools and public culture. Black history’s value is not its contribution to mainstream historical narratives, but its resonance in the lives of Black people.” LB/hg
Attachments: 1. Proclamation
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 1., Item Page 2, Packet Page 6 ATTACHMENT 1
Proclamation declaring
February 2026
Black History Month
WHEREAS, in 1926, Harvard scholar Carter G. Woodson founded the first African American History Week and the Association for the Study of African American Life and History (ASALH) to bring attention to the need of acknowledging Black history and representing those voices lost to time; and, WHEREAS, the week-long event and the ASALH were first founded in recognition of the lack of Black history in the nation’s educational curriculum and to promote the scientific study of Black life and history, the event inspired community celebrations nationwide; and WHEREAS, the month of February was chosen by Carter Woodson as a month of tradition and reform.

The month of February encompasses the birthdays of President Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass, two Americans who had prominent roles in shaping Black history. While recognizing traditional celebrations of the birthdays of the two men, Woodson hoped to inspire reform and refocusing on the contributions of the countless black men and women throughout history who have and continue to advance our nation; and,
WHEREAS, Black History Month was officially recognized by President Gerald Ford in 1976, calling upon the American people to “seize the opportunity to honor the too-often neglected accomplishments of Black Americans in every area of endeavor throughout our history” and since every U.S. president has designated February as Black History Month; and,
WHEREAS, the ASALH announced that the 2026 Black History theme is ‘A Century of Black History Commemorations”. The 100th anniversary theme “urge us to explore the impact and meaning of Black history and life commemorations in transforming the status of Black peoples in the modern world; and, WHEREAS, as 2026 marks the 100th anniversary of these celebrations, the ASALH states in their Executive Summary, “to understand the modern world, especially nations where Black peoples form a significant population, one must grapple with the impact that the public observances have had on the past and the present. This year, when we are also commemorating the 250th anniversary of United States independence, it is important to tell not only an inclusive history, but an accurate one”; and, WHEREAS, as a community, we can celebrate Black History Month and continue to work together towards a more fair and inclusive future; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT I, Tyller Williamson Mayor of the City of Monterey, on behalf of the City Council and citizens, hereby proclaim the month of February 2026 as Black History Month.

Dated: February 2026 _______________________
Tyller Williamson, Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 1., Item Page 3, Packet Page 7 Council
Agenda Report
№12/25
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: Receive a Presentation Introducing Nicole Banks as the City’s New Parks and Recreation Director (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378, and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council receive a presentation introducing Nicole Banks as the City’s new Parks and Recreation
Director.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Provide sufficient resources and support to develop,
retain, and recruit a high quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

It is common practice for new department heads to be
formally introduced to the City Council and community.

This presentation would introduce Nicole Banks as the
new Parks and Recreation Director.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no costs incurred in connection with this
presentation.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed
action is not a project as defined by the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14,
Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section
15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061
includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to
activities that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a Agenda Report Highlights
• Nicole Banks has been introduced
as the new Parks and Recreation
Director for the City of Monterey,
starting January 28, 2026.
• Banks brings over 20 years of
municipal recreation leadership
experience, including managing
large teams and budgets.
• She previously served as
Commissioner of Parks, Recreation
& Culture in Newton,
Massachusetts, overseeing 200+
acres of open space and various
public services.
• Banks is a Certified Park and
Recreation Professional (CPRP)
with expertise in community
collaboration, inclusive recreation
programs, and public space
activation.
• Former Parks and Recreation
Director Karen Larson retired in
June 2025 after 39 years of service
to the City of Monterey.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 2.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 2., Item Page 1, Packet Page 8 №11/25
category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could choose to not receive the presentation, but that is not recommended.

DISCUSSION:

Former Parks and Recreation Director Karen Larson retired from the City in June 2025 after 39 years of service to the City of Monterey. City staff acknowledges the hard work of division managers in the Division, including Recreation Manager Shannon Leon, Parks Operations Manager Thys Norton, and Sports Center Manager Bill Rothschild, as well as other members of the Parks and Recreation Department, for working with the City Manager’s Office and City team to keep the department operational and thriving.

After a rigorous nationwide search for a Parks and Recreation Director, the City has hired Nicole Banks. Ms. Banks comes to the City of Monterey from the City of Newton, Massachusetts, where she served as the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation & Culture. She brings over 20 years of experience in municipal recreation leadership. In her previous role, she managed a complex operation similar to the City of Monterey, leading a team of over 50 full-time staff and hundreds of seasonal employees. Her operational experience is extensive; she oversaw a $10 million budget and was responsible for the care of 200+ acres of open space, including the maintenance of 20,000 street trees and the management of public trash collection and snow clearing operations.

Beyond her operational expertise, Ms. Banks has a demonstrated history of building bridges.

She is a Certified Park and Recreation Professional (CPRP) who prioritizes collaboration.

Throughout her career, she has successfully facilitated community meetings with stakeholders and cultivated partnerships to maintain and beautify neighborhood spaces. She has also partnered with arts-focused groups to activate public spaces and ran one of the largest inclusive recreation programs in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Ms. Banks’ first day with the City was January 28, 2026.

NR
Attachment: Media Release
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 2., Item Page 2, Packet Page 9

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
DATE: January 28, 2026 PHONE: (831) 646-3760
CONTACTS: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City
Manager
E-MAIL: [email protected]

THE CITY OF MONTEREY WELCOMES NICOLE BANKS

AS THE NEXT PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
Monterey, Calif. – The City of Monterey is pleased to announce the hiring of Ms. Nicole Banks as the new Parks & Recreation Director. Ms. Banks was chosen after a rigorous recruitment process that began last fall. She comes to the City of Monterey from the City of Newton, Massachusetts, where she served as the Commissioner of Parks, Recreation & Culture. She brings over 20 years of experience in municipal recreation leadership. In her previous role, she managed a similarly complex operation, leading a team of over 50 full-time staff and hundreds of seasonal employees.

Her operational experience is extensive; she oversaw a $10 million budget and was responsible for the care of 200+ acres of open space, including the maintenance of 20,000 street trees and the management of public trash collection and snow clearing operations. “Nicole's expertise was made for what we offer Monterey Peninsula residents - robust, wellestablished, year-round, parks and recreation services and programs for community members of all ages,” said Interim City Manager Lew Bauman.

Assistant City Manager Nat Rojanasathira added, “Beyond her operational expertise, Nicole has a demonstrated history of building bridges. She is a Certified Park and Recreation Professional (CPRP) who prioritizes collaboration. We are delighted to have her join our team and predict she will come to love Monterey the way we all do.”
(more)

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 2., Item Page 3, Packet Page 10 Throughout her career, she has successfully facilitated community meetings with stakeholders and cultivated partnerships to maintain and beautify neighborhood spaces. Ms. Banks has also partnered with arts-focused groups to activate public spaces and ran one of the largest inclusive recreation programs in her state.

Nicole has made the move to the Monterey Peninsula and is excited to be part of our community.

She is eager to work with the outstanding City of Monterey team. As Parks & Recreation Director, she will oversee these divisions: Monterey Recreation, which includes the community centers, fields sports, and youth camps; the Monterey Sports Center; and the Parks Division which encompasses Parks and Beaches, Trees and Urban Forestry, Veteran’s Memorial Campground, and Cemetery El Encinal.

Parks and Recreation Director Nicole Banks remarked, “I’m truly excited to join this community and to work alongside residents, staff, and partners to build on the strong foundation of our parks and recreation programs and continue enhancing quality of life for all.” The Parks & Recreation Director Banks' annual salary will be $215,928. Ms. Bank’s first day is today, January 28, 2026. She will offer community meet and greet opportunities in the coming months.

City of Monterey Parks & Recreation Director Nicole Banks ###

ATTACHMENT
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 2., Item Page 4, Packet Page 11

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Tuesday, January 20, 2026
4:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

Interim City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Police Chief, Assistant Fire Chief, Public Works Director, City Clerk, Senior Associate Planner, General Services Superintendent, Senior Engineer, Recreation Manager, Senior Administrative Analyst (Public Works)

AFTERNOON SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:01 p.m. City Clerk Klein called the roll with the Council present as indicated above.

General Public Comments
Public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Gina Sessions.

Consent Agenda
On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the Consent Agenda:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Public comment on the Consent Items was solicited and not received.

Consent: Approval of Minutes

1. December 16, 2025 Regular Meeting (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Approved

2. January 10, 2026 Special Meeting (Adjourned to January 11, 2026) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Approved
Consent: Award of Construction Contracts

3. Award a Construction Contract in the Amount of $212,205.00 to The Don Chapin Co., Inc. for the Via Paraiso and Veterans Park Basketball Courts (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) ***NCIP*** Action: Adopted Resolution No. 26-002 C.S.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 3.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 1, Packet Page 12 City Council Minutes January 20, 2026
2 Consent: Resolutions

4. Accept Army Project Awards, Authorize the Finance Director to make Budget Appropriations in the Presidio of Monterey Public Works Fund in the Amount of $999,782.35 and Appropriate Project Budgets, Not Exceeding $350,000 Individually, Through June 30, 2026 ***IGSA*** (NEPA Not a Project, CEQA Not a Project under (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (a) and Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (b)(1)))
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 26-003 C.S.

5. Adopt Updated Exhibit A to Monterey City Code Section 2-1.07, "Conflict of Interest Code" (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 26-004 C.S.

6. Amend Resolution 25-088, Changing Position Control List by Adding One Overfill Chief of Inspection Services/Building Official Position in the Building Safety and Appropriate $57,108 One -Time for General Fund to Fund the Position Through May 1, 2026 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 26-005 C.S.

7. Authorize the Fire Chief to Execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the United States Coast Guard Cutter Hawksbill Regarding Fire Protection and Emergency Services (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 26-006 C.S.

8. Adopt a Resolution Opposing the Department of the Interior's Proposed Program for Offshore Oil and Gas Leases Off the California Coast (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Adopted Resolution No. 26-007 C.S.

End of Consent Agenda
Public Hearing (Afternoon)

9. Resolution to Modify the Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (MCTID) Management District Plan to Add the City of Sand City to the District (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) - Recommended to be Tabled
Action: Tabled
Public comment was received from Laurelle Whiteley, who requested further information about why the matter was being tabled. Interim City Manager Bauman explained that the matter was being tabled due to a noticing issue with See Monterey's consultant, and would return to Council as soon as possible.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, the City Council tabled the matter to allow for proper noticing:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 2, Packet Page 13 City Council Minutes January 20, 2026
3 10. Adopt Proposed Draft Findings and Declare an Intent to Consider Overruling the Monterey County Airport Land Use Commission’s Consistency Determination for Appeal Application AP-25-0236/Use Permit Application UP-25-0013 for a Day Care, General, Use at 2400 Garden Road; Appellant Henry Ruhnke, Wald, Ruhnke and Dost Architects LLP; Property Owner W R MONT LLC; and Directing that Notice Be Provided to the Airport Land Use Commission and the California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics (Exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1 and Section 15303, Class 3)
Action: Held public hearing; Adopted Resolution No. 26-008 C.S.

Planning Manager Hill gave a verbal staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Nina Beety, who expressed safety concerns regarding 5G cell towers and microwave radiation.

Mayor Williamson stressed that the matter at hand was unrelated to small cell wireless facilities, and that as a separate matter the City had followed all rules regarding small cell wireless facilities.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 26-008 C.S.:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

11. 1st Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 31 of the Monterey City Code to Add a Five-Foot Spacing Requirement Between Temporary Signs on Private Property (Exempt from CEQA Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3)
Action: Passed ordinance to a second reading, as amended to remove the second sentence ("The placement of signs next to each other to create the appearance of a single large sign is prohibited") and to increase the distance between signs to 10 feet.

Community Development Director Cole gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. Mayor Williamson added additional context.

Public comment was received from: Monique Kaldy, who said that her signs in 2024 had been cut into only two pieces and had not been unsightly; Nina Beety and Lori Mazzuca, who opposed the ordinance, alleging that it infringed on freedom of speech; and Esther Malkin, who spoke in support of the ordinance on behalf of an affected neighborhood that she said did not want billboards.

The Council discussed the matter.

In opposition to the ordinance, details were provided about the 2024 signs in question and concern was expressed about the proposed change affecting the rights of property owners to express themselves through signs. It was stated that bringing the ordinance forward was not worth staff's time and that staff should not have to involve themselves in the matter.

On the other hand, it was expressed that this change was not intended to discourage people to have signs on their property but was a logical policy clean-up to help clear up confusion for campaigns and City staff. It was noted that City staff already had the responsibility to enforce City Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 3, Packet Page 14 City Council Minutes January 20, 2026
4 regulations and that the updated provisions would help to provide further specifics for the job they already were required to perform.

A motion was introduced by Councilmember Garcia, and seconded by Councilmember Barber, to pass the ordinance to a second reading.

The Council continued to discuss the matter. Concern was expressed that the second sentence of the proposed changes was subjective, treaded into interpretation, and could introduce some risk for a content question. The mover said that the resulting regulations needed to be clear and not open to interpretation.

City Attorney Davi suggested eliminating the second proposed sentence. She stressed that the existing ordinance and the proposed amendment did not regulate the content of speech. She noted that the proposed five-foot measurement requirement was not subjective because anyone could measure five feet.

During the conversation, Councilmember Barber left the Chamber from 4:48 p.m. to 4:50 p.m.

Councilmember Rasch suggested a friendly amendment to remove the second proposed sentence. The mover and seconder did not take up this amendment.

Mayor Williamson suggested a friendly amendment that would remove the second proposed sentence ("The placement of signs next to each other to create the appearance of a single large sign is prohibited") and increase the required distance between signs to 10 feet. The mover and seconder agreed with this amendment. The motion, as amended, passed by the following vote:

AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Williamson NOES: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Smith
Presentations (Afternoon)

12. Receive Presentation on the Brown Act (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Received presentation
Assistant City Attorney Krattli gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Daniel Armendariz, who stressed the importance of transparency and expressed concern about his treatment by City staff; and Nina Beety, who alleged that Councilmembers had at times appeared to have violated the Brown Act by conferring by text message with City staff and/or members of the public during public meetings.

Council discussed the matter. It was stated that if the Council's actions at the dais had posed a legal concern, the City Attorney would have addressed it. The importance was stressed of sharing the Brown Act rules, and how they applies to the City Council, with the public. It was noted that the Mayor and Vice Mayor met prior to each Council meeting to discuss the agenda, primarily regarding time management of the upcoming meeting. Concern was expressed that this preagenda meeting appeared to provide these members with sooner opportunities for adding items to the agenda, compared with other members.

On question from the Council, City Attorney Davi said that there was case law allowing a discussion such as takes place in the Mayor and Vice Mayor pre-agenda meeting. She stressed Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 4, Packet Page 15 City Council Minutes January 20, 2026
5 that Brown Act mistakes were easy to remedy and that anyone with concerns about an error should contact the City Attorney's office to help restore transparency.

The Council expressed some interest in adding the Mayor and Vice Mayor's pre-agenda planning meeting to the Council's governance policy. Regarding texting at the dais, it was noted that members of the Council had personal lives as well as public lives and that before judging the use of a phone it was important to have all of the facts.

On question from the Council, Assistant City Attorney Krattli said that text messages about City business, even on personal phones, were public records. She said the texting would be a violation of the Brown Act if it involved a majority of members of a body.

Adjourn to Closed Session
Public comment on the closed session, specifically the City Manager recruitment, was received from: Bob Faulis, who spoke about importance of selecting a businessperson who could assist with the structural budget deficit; and Nina Beety, who said that she had requested and continued to request that Councilmembers leave their cell phones and smart watches outside the room in order not to violate confidentiality during recruitment discussions.

City Attorney Davi noted that the City Charter required the recording of Council closed sessions.

The Council expressed that it would be quite an overstep of California law to record individuals without their knowledge.

The Council recessed to closed session at 5:44 p.m.

Closed Session (Afternoon)

13. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(1): Stronghold Engineering, Inc. v. City of Monterey (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 18CV329015) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: No reportable action taken

14. Public Employee Appointment Pursuant to Government Code section 54957(b)(1) - City Manager (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) - Continued from January 11, 2026 Action: On a unanimous roll call vote, direction was given to send a conditional offer to a City Manager candidate. Appointment and contract approval anticipated to come to the Council at the February 3, 2026 meeting in open session as a public appearance item.

15. Conference with Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6; Unrepresented Employee: Prospective City Manager; Agency Negotiator: Valerie Phillips (Bob Murray & Associates) (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) - Continued from January 11, 2026 Action: No reportable action taken

16. Closed Session Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: 560-570 Munras Avenue (Trader Joe’s Shopping Center) Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete
Negotiating Parties: ROIC Monterey, LLC
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 5, Packet Page 16 City Council Minutes January 20, 2026
6 Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Consent to Assignment of Ground Lease to ZH Asheville, LLC
(Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Not heard
The Council recessed at 7:00 p.m. and reconvened at 7:05 p.m.

EVENING SESSION AGENDA
Pledge of Allegiance
Councilmember Barber led the Pledge.

General Public Comments, Continued
Continued public comment on non-agendized matters was received from Rick Heuer of Monterey Peninsula Taxpayers Association, Betsy Wilson, and Daniel Armendariz.

Announcements from Closed Session
City Attorney Davi reported out from the closed session as indicated in the actions recorded for closed session items 13, 14, 15, and 16, above.

Evening Session Items
Public Appearance (Evening)

17. Receive Presentation on Round Two of Phase 1 Poll of Likely Voters: Potential Tax Measures to Reduce the City's $10 Million Structural (Annual) Budget Deficit and Provide Direction to Staff (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Received presentation; Expressed unanimous support for staff to further evaluate a 0.375 cent sales tax measure with a nine year sunset; Expressed consensus support of four members for staff to further evaluate each of the following: a parking tax, a major attraction admissions tax, and a vacant homes tax; Reached consensus to direct staff to continue exploring the potential placement of measures for sales tax, parking tax, and admissions tax on the June 2026 ballot, and to postpone further near-term consideration of a vacancy tax until pending resolution of legal issues in other jurisdictions Lucia Del Puppo of Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz & Associates (FM3) gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions with additional clarification provided by Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira.

Public comment was received from: Rick Heuer of Monterey Peninsula Taxpayers Association, who suggested that the $10 million structural deficit was actually a $4 million structural deficit if adding to fiscal reserves were to be removed from the equation, and said that the City needed to make difficult decisions first; Lori Mazzuca, who echoed Mr. Heuer's remarks and asked the Council to do the hard work to look at what to get rid of and how to reduce expenses; and Esther Malkin, who stressed that voters need education on what it takes to increase affordable housing and reduce homelessness.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 6, Packet Page 17 City Council Minutes January 20, 2026
7 The Council discussed the matter. Appreciation was expressed for the work done by the consultant and City staff on the polling. It was stressed that the polled voters were real residents and that it was important to listen and value what they had expressed through the polling.

Regarding the potential sales tax, support was expressed for a 0.375% rate based on approval expressed by polled voters, and it was noted that the option for a nine-year sunset had not made a difference in the potential approval of such a sales tax measure. It was expressed that, on principle, and based on accountability, there should be a built-in sunset.

It was noted that there were outstanding legal questions regarding a potential admissions tax and/or vacant homes tax. Comments were made expressing interest in a potential admissions tax, and disinterest in a potential vacancy tax. It was stated that more information was needed regarding admissions taxes. On question from the Council, City Attorney Davi provided information about the San Francisco vacancy tax legal case and other related pending matters.

Regarding a potential parking tax, support was expressed, stating that it was time to capture income through these means. It was expressed that a parking tax of 10% may be too high, and further information was requested about the potential impact of 5-6% and about parking tax rates in other semi-local jurisdictions.

On question from the Council: Ms. Del Puppo said that the "Next Steps for June 2026" slide (slide 27) had an error and that the "yes" percentage for Option B (0.375% sales tax with nine-year sunset) should indicate 54%, not 57%, support; City Attorney Davi confirmed the requirements for placing a sales tax on the ballot; and Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira provided a timeline and estimated revenue for the various tax measures.

The Council requested more clarity about what constituted the $10 million budget deficit and how it had developed, and about the current total dollar amount associated with funded unfilled positions and which of them should not be refilled. Regarding fiscal reserves, it was stated that it was prudent to set funding aside but also to figure out how to pay for deferred maintenance. The impact of 1978 Proposition 13 on municipal finances was noted.

Support was expressed for City staff working to find ways to cut expenses, and it was noted that this could create difficult conversations. Two programs that were suggested for potential elimination were the rental registry and rental assistance programs, with statements made that the personnel could shift to fill other vacancies. On the other hand, it was stated that the rental inventory program was revenue neutral and that the rental assistance program had not added any City positions, and that eliminating them would not generate a significant difference in the deficit.

Interim City Manager Bauman asked the Council for consensus direction with tax measures using the Next Steps for June 2026 slide. Support was expressed as follows:

A 0.375 Cent Sales Tax – Until Ended by Voters: 3 yeses, 2 noes B 0.375 Cent Sales Tax – 9 Year Sunset: 5 yeses
C 0.5 to 0.875 Cent Sales Tax Extension and Increase – Until Ended by Voters: 0 yeses, 5 noes D 0.5 to 0.875 Cent Sales Tax Extension and Increase – 9 Year Sunset: 1 yes, 4 noes E Parking Tax: 4 yeses, 1 no
F Major Attraction Admissions Tax: 4 yeses, 1 no
G Vacant Homes Tax: 4 yeses, 1 no
Interim City Manager Bauman said that staff would bring further information to Council on the items that received a consensus of members in favor.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 7, Packet Page 18 City Council Minutes January 20, 2026
8 City Attorney Davi asked for guidance on whether there were some matters that could go forward in November instead of June. The Council agreed on consensus to continue exploring the placement of measures for sales tax, parking tax, and admissions tax on the June 2026 ballot, and to postpone further consideration of a vacancy tax until pending legal issues in other jurisdictions were resolved.

On question from the Council, Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira said that renewal of Measure P & S would be scheduled for November 2026, and noted that there could also be discussions about whether there was an appetite for a public safety facility bond measure for November as well.

Council Comments
Councilmember Rasch praised Police Chief Hober for his work opening the Monterey Sports Center during the power outages over the December holidays.

Councilmember Smith spoke about the importance of educating residents about how to be selfsufficient for a period of 36 hours in an emergency situation. He suggested that Communications Manager Huelga speak to the public about what happens behind the scenes at the City during an emergency.

Mayor Williamson said that it was important for residents to know that the City website provides updates and assistance during an emergency. He stressed that it was crucial to counteract false narratives that can be spun during these challenging times. It was noted that the City maintains open dialogue and communication with Pacific Gas and Electric ("PG&E") staff.

City Manager Reports
Interim City Manager Bauman said that he had been impressed with City staff's response during the winter storms and power outages. He said that PG&E staff had shared with City staff the complexity and difficulty of dealing with the falling trees affecting power. He announced that the Monterey Public Library lockers had opened at the Monterey Sports Center and at Montecito Park Fire Station 13, and that the First City Academy Spring cohort application had opened with many applications received already.

Adjournment
The Council adjourned at 9:01 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 3., Item Page 8, Packet Page 19

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING

CITY OF MONTEREY
Wednesday, January 28, 2026
4:00 PM
COUNCIL CHAMBER, 580 PACIFIC ST.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA
Councilmembers

Present: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson

Absent: None
City Staff

Present:

Interim City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, Finance Director, Community Development Director, Police Chief, Public Works Director, Parks and Recreation Director, City Clerk, Assistant Fire Chief, General Services Superintendent, Recreation Manager, Park Operations Manager, Management Analyst (City Manager's Office), Engineering Projects Manager, Environmental Regulations Analyst, Facility Worker (Monterey Sports Center)

AFTERNOON SESSION
Call to Order
Mayor Williamson called the meeting to order at 4:04 p.m. City Clerk Klein called the roll with the Council present as indicated above.

Adjourn to Closed Session
Public comment on the closed session was solicited but not received. The Council adjourned to closed session at 4:08 p.m.

Closed Session

1. Conference with Legal Counsel, Significant Exposure to Litigation Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(d)(2), (e)(1) (One Case) (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: No reportable action taken
The Council recessed at 4:50 p.m. and reconvened at 4:53 p.m.

Pledge of Allegiance
Councilmember Rasch led the Pledge.

Announcements from Closed Session
Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira reported out from the closed session as indicated in the action recorded for closed session item 1, above.

Consent Agenda
Public comment on the Consent Items was solicited but not received.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 4.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 4., Item Page 1, Packet Page 20 City Council Minutes January 28, 2026
2 On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Rasch, and carried by the following vote, the City Council approved the Consent Agenda except Item 2:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Consent: Resolutions

2. Accept Grant Funds from the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), Authorize Grant Agreement for Implementation of Monterey’s Citywide Fuel Reduction Project, Authorize an Increase in FY27 and FY28 Annual Revenues by $475,000, Appropriate Grant Funds, and Appropriate l Matching Funds of $100,000 (Approved Supplemental Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration) Action: Pulled from Consent; Adopted Resolution No. 26-009 C.S.

Park Operations Manager Norton gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Adam Pinterits of the Monterey County Association of Realtors, who spoke in support of accepting the grant funds, and asked to prioritize residential neighborhoods particularly at risk and to document that the risk has been reduced; Nina Beety, who spoke against the proposal, citing the need to preserve vegetation and habitat; and Esther Malkin, who urged the City to include Laguna Grande Park in its fire mitigation efforts.

On question from the Council, Park Operations Manager Norton explained that the Parks division endeavors to keep a ground fire from turning into a crown fire, by reducing "ladder fuels," and that they follow all recommendations of Cal Fire and Monterey Fire Department. He said that Monterey had done a lot of work on its side of Laguna Grande Park, and that City of Seaside had money set aside for their work and was trying to get started on their side. Fire Chief Moore explained that California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection ("Cal Fire") has expertise in the field and provided details about the City's fire prevention efforts, including the use of vegetation management, defensible space inspection, and early recognition cameras. He explained that Cal Fire severity zones are prioritized in order of severity and provided details about vegetation management around the hospital and care facilities based on severity of the zones.

On a motion by Councilmember Rasch, seconded by Councilmember Barber, and carried by the following vote, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 26-009 C.S.:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

3. Adopt New Resolution of Intention to Modify the Monterey County Tourism Improvement District (MCTID) Management District Plan to Add the City of Sand City to the District (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Adopted Resolution No. 26-010 C.S.

End of Consent Agenda
Afternoon Session Items
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 4., Item Page 2, Packet Page 21 City Council Minutes January 28, 2026
3 Public Appearance

4. Receive a Presentation on the Draft Stormwater Utility Fee Study Results and Authorize Staff to Initiate the Process for Fee Adoption (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) Action: Directed staff to initiate a Proposition 218 process for the proposed adoption of a stormwater utility fee
City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Easterling gave the staff presentation together with Chris Coulter of SCI Consultants, and answered Councilmembers' questions.

Public comment was received from: Lori Mazzuca and Tom Reeves, who both asked questions.

On question from the Council, relating to questions received from the public: Community Development Director Cole said that there was no direct relationship between the operations and maintenance of storm drain pipes and the Local Coastal Plan ("LCP"), but that permitting would revert to the City once it had a certified LCP; City Engineer/Deputy Public Works Director Easterling provided the previous fee amount and said that if the new proposed fee were not approved, the City would still follow regulatory requirements and the work would have to be financed out of the general fund; and City Attorney Davi said that going through the Proposition 218 process was required by law as part of adjusting the rates.

On a motion by Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, and carried by the following vote, the City Council directed staff to initiate the process for stormwater fee adoption:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)

5. Update on the Budget Deficit, Deficit Strategies, Chilled (Authorized but Unfunded) Positions, and Provide Direction on Whether to Place Ballot Measures on the June 2026 Election Ballot (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
Action: Directed staff to prepare materials for placing measures for a 0.375% sales tax with a nine-year sunset, and a parking tax of 8%, on the June 2026 ballot Interim City Manager Bauman, Finance Director King, and Assistant City Manager Rojanasathira gave the staff presentation and answered Councilmembers' questions. During the presentation, Councilmember Barber left the Chamber from 6:05 p.m. to 6:07 p.m.

Public comment on the matter was solicited and not received.

The Council discussed the matter. It was discussed whether a parking tax measure would be successful, whether it should be placed on the ballot, and if so, what percentage parking tax should be proposed. It was stated that there are concerns about moving forward with an admissions tax for the June election, but that the City could continue to consider it for possible placement on the November ballot.

On a motion by Mayor Williamson, seconded by Councilmember Smith, and carried by the following vote, the City Council directed staff to prepare materials for placing measures for a

0.375% sales tax with a nine-year sunset, and a parking tax of 8%, on the June 2026 ballot:

AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Barber, Garcia, Rasch, Smith, Williamson NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: (None)
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 4., Item Page 3, Packet Page 22 City Council Minutes January 28, 2026
4 Adjournment
The Council adjourned at 6:48 p.m.

Respectfully Submitted, Approved,
Clementine Bonner Klein Tyller Williamson
City Clerk Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 4., Item Page 4, Packet Page 23 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Karl Kreutzer, Environmental Regulation Analyst SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract in the Amount of $420,095.00 to Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. for the Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Aguajito Sewer Cured-in-Place Pipe (Exempt from CEQA, Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the plans and specifications for the
Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Aguajito
Sewer Cured-in-Place Pipe (CIPP) (“Project”)
which are available in the office of the City
Engineer (Room 7), and granting the Public
Works Director, or their designee, the authority
to approve all amendments and addenda
thereto as necessitated by conditions in the
field;

2. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awarding a Construction Contract for the Total
Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible
bidder, Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless
Corp. in the amount of $420,095.00;

4. Authorizing the City Manager, or their
designee, to execute the contract upon the
receipt of the information required by the
Project plans and specifications; and

5. Authorizing staff to expend up to an additional
15% for unforeseen construction
contingencies for timely completion of the
Project
VALUE DRIVERS:

In collaboration with our community partners, work to
improve the quality of life of all of our community
members by fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion;
championing equitable access to affordable housing;
and maintaining a safe environment.

Agenda Report Highlights
• The City Council is recommended to
award a $420,095 construction
contract to Southwest Pipeline and
Trenchless Corp. for the
rehabilitation of the Aguajito Sewer
System using cured-in-place pipe.
• The project will rehabilitate over
1,800 feet of deteriorating sewer
pipes, with construction expected to
begin in late February and
completed within 45 working days.
• The project will rehabilitate over
1,800 feet of deteriorating sewer
pipes, with construction expected to
begin in late February and
completed within 45 working days.
• The project is funded by the CIP
account, which has a balance of
$1,669,137.24, sufficient to cover
the estimated total cost of
$525,109.25.
• The project is funded by the CIP
account, which has a balance of
$1,669,137.24, sufficient to cover
the estimated total cost of
$525,109.25.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 5.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 1, Packet Page 24 №11/25
Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is in accordance with Chapter 28-Purchasing of the City Code, which requires Public Works project contract awards exceeding $150,000 to be approved by City Council.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

On December 9, 2025, five (5) bids were received, but only four (4) were deemed responsive and responsible. The apparent lowest bidder came in below the Engineer’s estimate of $1,068,617.00. The bids were opened by the Finance Director’s designee as follows:

Bidder Total Bid
Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. $420,095.00
Hardiman Construction, Inc. $873,895.00
Lamassu Utility Services, Inc. $912,510.65
Nor-Cal Pipeline Services $1,361,930.00
Engineer’s Estimate $1,068,617.00
Basis of award for this project is based on the Total Bid.

Estimated Construction Cost:

Total Bid $420,095.00
Construction Contingency (15%) $63,014.25
Total Construction Cost (This Authorization) $483,109.25 Construction Management (City Staff & Indirect Cost – 10%) $ 42,000.00 Total Estimated Cost to Complete the Project $ 525,109.25 Available Funding Sources:

CIP Account: 33C1750 $1,669,137.24
This project has an available funding balance of $1,669,137.24 as of December 9, 2025.

Therefore, funding is available in the project account for the construction of the Total Bid .

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of the rehabilitation of sanitary sewer pipe via cured-in-place pipe (CIPP). All Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 2, Packet Page 25 №11/25
work is within the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located -a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may have an impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Exception a – Location – does not apply to projects which are exempt under Class 1.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. There would be no cumulative impact because the project does not involve the creation of additional automobile lanes.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. No unusual circumstances are anticipated due to improvements’ limited scope and distinct locations.

Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. No impact to sites included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government code would occur.

Exception f - Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The project would not impact historic resources as project improvements would only occur in the public right-of-way. The project is located in a sensitive archeological area as shown on the General Plan EIR Figure 8; however, there will be no excavation for this project. Therefore, there would be no impacts to historic or archeological resources.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the construction contract for this project; however, this is not recommended since the proposed project implements maintenance activities that are required to maintain existing infrastructure.

DISCUSSION:

The Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Aguajito Sewer CIPP project is a project to rehabilitate and repair the City’s deteriorating sanitary sewer collection system. Over the past 10 years, engineering assessments have been performed to rate the condition of the sewer Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 3, Packet Page 26 №11/25
system. Sewer structures (pipes, manholes, and lift stations) were rated based on their existing level of deficiencies utilizing an “A” through “F” standard rating system, with those receiving a “C”, “D”, or “F” rating prioritized for rehabilitation. This contract includes over 1,800 feet of new, cured-in-place pipe lining. Construction is anticipated to begin in late February and has 45 working days to be completed from the effective date of the Notice to Proceed The low bid, submitted by Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp., is 60% lower than the Engineer’s Estimate. The engineer’s estimate was established using previous City of Monterey CIPP liner rehabilitation projects and current market bid item pricing. The engineer’s estimate included a 5% increase for inflation. Upon evaluation of the bid results, the contractor’s bids were considerably lower than estimated for general construction activities such as mobilization, as well as in 18-inch and 20-inch CIPP rehabilitation. 18-20-inch liner makes up the majority of the Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Aguajito Sewer CIPP Project. Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp. was significantly lower in price than all other bidders and the engineers estimate. The average bid among the four responsive, responsible bidders was within 17% of the engineer’s estimate suggesting that the bids are consistent with prevailing construction costs in this area at this time for this type of work. The low bid will allow for more rehabilitation work to be performed.

A 15% contingency is recommended. All work will occur underground where unanticipated subsurface conditions are more common. The additional contingency budget also will allow for additional repairs to be performed at very favorable prices.

Southwest Pipeline & Trenchless Corp., of Torrance, is well qualified to complete this Project.

This contractor completed numerous sewer projects in the past including a 106,920 LF of sewer rehabilitation by CIPP for the City of Beverly Hill and 10,146 LF of sewer rehabilitation by CIPP with “Top Hat” lateral connections for the City of El Cajon. Construction is anticipated to begin late February/early March and has 45 working days to be completed from the effective date of the Notice to Proceed. Public Works/Engineering staff will oversee the construction management and inspection of this Project.

AR/kk/pl
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Bid Evaluation Tab
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 4, Packet Page 27 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $420,095.00 TO SOUTHWEST PIPELINE AND TRENCHLESS CORP. FOR THE SANITARY SEWER

SYSTEM REHABILITATION AGUAJITO SEWER CURED-IN-PLACE PIPE PROJECT WHEREAS, on the 9th day of December 2025, at 2:00 p.m. the City of Monterey Finance Director’s designee received five (5) electronic bids through the City’s e-Procurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement, for the Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Aguajito Sewer Cured-inPlace Pipe (CIPP) (“Project”); WHEREAS, Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp., Hardiman Construction, Inc, Lamassu Utility Services, Inc., and Nor-Cal Pipeline Services submitted responsive, responsible bids for the Project;
WHEREAS, the basis of award for the project was the Total Base Bid; WHEREAS, Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp. submitted the lowest responsive, and responsible bid in the amount of $420,095.00;
WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the CIP account 33C1750 to complete the project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Article 19, Section 15301, Class 1) because the project consists of the rehabilitation of sanitary sewer pipe via cured-in-place pipe (CIPP). All work is within the public-right-of-way. Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 5, Packet Page 28 Exception d - Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The project would not be visible from a scenic highway.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that the above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approves the plans and specifications for the Sanitary Sewer System Rehabilitation Aguajito Sewer CIPP (33C1750) (“Project”) which are available in the office of the City Engineer (Room 7), and grants the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Accepts all responsive, responsible bids;

3. Awards a Construction Contract for the Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Southwest Pipeline and Trenchless Corp., in the amount of $420,095.00;

4. Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Project plans and specifications; and

5. Authorizes staff to expend up to an additional 15% for unforeseen construction contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 6, Packet Page 29 NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 7, Packet Page 30 City of Monterey
Finance Department
Rafaela King, Finance Director
580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940

EVALUATION TABULATION
General Solicitation - SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM REHABILITATION AGUAJITO SEWER CIPP (33C1750)

Page 1 ends

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. 33C1750
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM REHABILITATION AGUAJITO SEWER CIPP (33C1750) RESPONSE DEADLINE: December 9, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Wednesday, December 10, 2025

SELECTED VENDOR TOTALS
Vendor Total
Southwest Pipeline &
Trenchless Corp.
$420,095.00
Hardiman Construction,
Inc.
$873,895.00

LAMASSU UTILITY

SERVICES INC
$912,510.65
Nor-Cal Pipeline Services $1,361,930.00
TABLE 1
Vendor Total
Southwest Pipeline &
Trenchless Corp.
$420,095.00
Hardiman Construction,
Inc.
$873,895.00

LAMASSU UTILITY

SERVICES INC
$912,510.65
Nor-Cal Pipeline Services $1,361,930.00
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 5., Item Page 8, Packet Page 31 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Richard Llantero, Associate Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract to Eaton Corporation in the Amount of $192,950.00 for the Removal and Replacement of 90 Enersys Batteries at Camp Roberts – Project POM 25-011 ***IGSA*** (Categorically Excluded from NEPA 32 CFR, Part 651, Section II(g)(1) (CEQA Not a Project)) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Awarding a Sole Source Construction Contract
to Eaton Corporation in the amount of
$192,950.00 for the Removal and Replacement
of 90 Enersys Batteries at Camp Roberts (POM
25-011) (“Project”);

2. Authorizing the City Manager, or their designee,
to execute the contract upon the receipt of
information required by the contract; and

3. Authorizing the Public Works Director, or their
designee, to execute contract change orders and
to expend up to an additional 2% for unforeseen
contingencies for timely completion of the
Project.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life –
“Respond effectively to neighborhood concerns” and
Fiscal Stewardship – “Support our military installations Agenda Report Highlights
• The City Council is recommended to
award a $192,950 sole source
contract to Eaton Corporation for
replacing 90 Enersys batteries at
Camp Roberts.
• The project ensures the continued
operation of the Uninterruptible
Power Supply (UPS) system, critical
for preventing data loss and
equipment damage during power
failures.
• The batteries, installed in
September 2020, are due for
replacement to maintain
functionality and prevent potential
failures, fires, or explosions.
• The sole source contract is justified
due to the proprietary nature of the
UPS equipment and compatibility
requirements with Eaton
Corporation.
• The project is fully reimbursed by
the U.S. Army under the
Intergovernmental Support
Agreement (IGSA) with the City of
Monterey.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 6.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 6., Item Page 1, Packet Page 32 №11/25
(U.S. Army Garrison Presidio of Monterey, Naval Support Activity Monterey, and U.S. Coast Guard Station Monterey) as significant economic drivers in the region.

This action is consistent with the City’s policy to provide services to the U.S. Department of the Army through the Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) between the City of Monterey and the Federal Government.

This action is also consistent with the City’s policy to approve Public Works contracts exceeding $150,000.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

This action does not appropriate any funding. Any projects constructed under this Job Order contract will be fully funded by the U.S. Army through the IGSA within current appropriations.

As set forth in Monterey City Code Section 28-5, contracts for public works projects estimated in value at one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) or more shall be by formal written bid, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 28-4(c)(1) through (c)(7), with contracts awarded by the City Council to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder.

Monterey City Code section 28-14(d) allows for an exemption from formal bidding requirements in cases where the contract or purchase is capable of being performed by a sole provider when there is a demonstrated need for compatibility with an existing item or service. The award of this Public Works Project utilizes an accepted sole source option, approved by the Finance Director, or their designee, on January 20, 2026.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The proposed action has been reviewed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and determined to qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CX). The proposed action is categorically excluded under the provisions set forth in “Part II Department of Defense, Department of the Army, 32 CFR Part 651 Environmental Analysis of Army Actions; (29 March 2002 Edition) Appendix B to Part 651-Categorical Exclusions” as follows:

II(g)(1) Routine repair and maintenance of buildings, airfields, grounds, equipment, and other facilities. Examples include, but are not limited to: Removal and disposal of asbestos-containing material (for example, roof material and floor tile) or lead-based paint in accordance with applicable regulations; removal of dead, diseased, or damaged trees; and repair of roofs, doors, windows, or fixtures (REC required for removal and disposal of ACM and LBP or work on historic structures).

All screening conditions in 32 CFR 651.29 have been met. No circumstances exist that would require an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA.

CEQA applies to discretionary projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (a).) CEQA does not apply to ministerial projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (b)(1).). There is a recognized policy consideration underlying the distinction between ministerial and discretionary projects. The purpose of CEQA is to minimize the adverse effects of new construction on the environment. To trigger CEQA compliance, the discretion must be of a certain kind; it must provide the agency with the ability and authority to mitigate environmental damage to some Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 6., Item Page 2, Packet Page 33 №11/25
degree. Unless a public agency can shape the project in a way that would respond to concerns raised in an EIR, or its functional equivalent, environmental review would be a meaningless exercise.

Here, the City does not have the power to deny or condition the permit, or otherwise modify the project in ways which would mitigate environmental problems an environmental impact report might conceivably have identified. The City does not have the authority to dictate changes to the Army’s project’s design or location in response to any impacts that an environmental review might reveal, the City’s authority under CEQA is essentially ministerial and therefore no further environmental review is required by the City.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the sole source contract and direct staff to advertise the project for bids; however, this is not recommended. The current Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) equipment and software is owned and operated by Eaton Corporation; no other contractors/products are compatible. It would be cost prohibitive for the Army to purchase new equipment in order to be serviced by another contractor. The Army owns the impacted equipment and the City arranges for subcontracted services for this equipment.

DISCUSSION:

Overview
Under an Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA), the City of Monterey provides services to the Department of the U.S. Army, which are fully reimbursed by the Federal government. The City coordinates a variety of projects on the U.S. Army Signal Activity (USASA) Camp Roberts in San Luis Obispo County, including this project to remove and replace Enersys batteries.

Project
The objective of this project is to remove and replace a total of 90 6HX800F-FR Enersys batteries at Camp Roberts. These batteries are critical to ensure the continued operation of Camp Robert’s Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) system, which is a device that provides instant, seamless backup power to electronics when the main electricity fails. If the electricity fails, the UPS system prevents data loss and equipment damage by supplying clean, regulated power from its stored energy until the grid returns or a generator starts.

The manufacturer recommends replacing these batteries every five (5) years. They are replaced in bulk to maintain continuity and consistency, and to avoid battery failures, fires, and explosions. The current batteries were installed in September 2020, and they are due to be replaced. This will allow another five (5) years of proper functionality.

The UPS and the batteries are proprietary equipment and are installed and maintained solely by Eaton Corporation. Monterey City Code section 28-14(d) allows for an exemption from formal bidding requirements in cases where the contract or purchase is capable of being performed by a sole provider when there is a demonstrated need for compatibility with an existing item or service. The award of this Public Works Project utilizes an accepted sole source option, approved by the Finance Director, or their designee, on January 20, 2026.

AR/rl/cg
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 6., Item Page 3, Packet Page 34 №11/25
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Eaton Corporation
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 6., Item Page 4, Packet Page 35 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24

AWARDING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO EATON CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $192,950.00 FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 90 ENERSYS BATTERIES AT CAMP ROBERTS – PROJECT POM 25-011 ***IGSA***
WHEREAS, under an Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA), the City of Monterey provides services to the Department of the U.S. Army, which are fully reimbursed by the Federal government. The City coordinates a variety of projects on Camp Roberts, including this project to remove and replace Enersys batteries;
WHEREAS, replacement of batteries ensures the continued operation of Camp Robert’s Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) system in the event of electricity/power disruptions; WHEREAS, the UPS equipment and batteries are proprietary products and are installed and maintained solely by the Eaton Corporation;
WHEREAS, Monterey City Code section 28-14(d) allows for an exemption from formal bidding requirements in cases where the contract or purchase is capable of being performed by a sole provider when there is a demonstrated need for compatibility with an existing item or service;
WHEREAS, the award of this Public Works Contract utilizes an accepted sole source vendor, approved by the Finance Director, or their designee, on January 20, 2026; and WHEREAS, the proposed action has been reviewed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and determined to qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CX).

The proposed action is categorically excluded under the provisions set forth in “Part II Department of Defense, Department of the Army, 32 CFR Part 651 Environmental Analysis of Army Actions; (29 March 2002 Edition) Appendix B to Part 651-Categorical Exclusions” as follows:

All screening conditions in 32 CFR 651.29 have been met. No circumstances exist that would require an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA.

CEQA applies to discretionary projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (a).) CEQA does not apply to ministerial projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (b)(1).). There is a recognized policy consideration underlying the distinction between ministerial and discretionary projects. The purpose of CEQA is to minimize the adverse effects of new construction on the environment. To trigger CEQA compliance, the discretion must be of a certain kind; it must Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 6., Item Page 5, Packet Page 36 provide the agency with the ability and authority to mitigate environmental damage to some degree. Unless a public agency can shape the project in a way that would respond to concerns raised in an EIR, or its functional equivalent, environmental review would be a meaningless exercise.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Awards a Sole Source Construction Contract to Eaton Corporation in the Amount of $192,950.00 for the Removal and Replacement of 90 Enersys Batteries at Camp Roberts (POM 25-011) (“Project”);

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of information required by the contract; and

3. Authorizes the Public Works Director, or their designee, to execute contract change orders and expend up to an additional 2% for unforeseen contingencies for timely completion of the Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 6., Item Page 6, Packet Page 37 ORDINANCE NO. ____ C.S.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№09/24
AMENDING CHAPTER 31 OF THE MONTEREY CITY CODE TO ADD A TEN-FOOT

SPACING REQUIREMENT BETWEEN TEMPORARY SIGNS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY DOES ORDAIN, as follows:

SECTION 1:

WHEREAS, on November 4, 2025, the City Council considered and approved a request from Mayor Williamson to agendize this matter. Mayor Williamson described the purpose of the proposed revision as follows: “[d]uring our most recent election, several properties displayed multiple temporary signs placed directly adjacent to each other, effectively creating the appearance of a single, large sign. While current code limits the total allowable sign area, it does not specify minimum spacing between signs. This omission has led to inconsistent application of the ordinance and diminished the visual character of our neighborhoods”; WHEREAS, on January 20, 2026, the City Council considered the matter at the ordinance’s first reading and determined that the distance between signs should be ten (10) feet;
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Monterey has determined that this amendment is necessary to control the location of signs to prevent the combining of signs to create the appearance of a large sign that detracts from, and obscures, the scenic qualities of the City of Monterey and its individual neighborhoods;
WHEREAS, this amendment does not change the number of signs or the aggregate area of square feet allowed per individual sign. Rather, this amendment is intended to prohibit the placement of otherwise legally sized signs together to create the image of one large sign of a size that would be prohibited under existing law;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Planning Office determined the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines per Article 19, Section 15303, Class 3 because the proposed ordinance establishes a minimum distance between temporary signs (construction and location of limited numbers of new small structures). Furthermore, the project does not qualify for any of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions found at CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2.

Exception a - Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located - a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. The proposed ordinance creates a minimum distance between temporary signs. The environment is not considered sensitive.

Exception b - Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 7.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 7., Item Page 1, Packet Page 38 cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The ordinance establishes regulations to minimize the cumulative impact of temporary signs (distance between temporary signs). No impact is anticipated.

Exception c - Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The ordinance would not have a significant effect on the environment because there are no unusual circumstances created by establishing a minimum distance between temporary signs.

Exception e - Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The proposed ordinance creates a minimum distance between temporary signs. No impact to hazardous waste sites will occur.

NOW THEREFORE, the Monterey City Council declares as follows:

SECTION 2: The above recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated and adopted as findings of the City Council as if fully set forth herein.

SECTION 3: Monterey City Code, Chapter 31, Section 31-3, Table 31-1.1 Exempt Signs, is amended to read as follows:

Temporary signs displaying a noncommercial (e.g., ideological, religious, political) message
Temporary Private Party
Ground-Mounted Signs on
Private Property Maximum aggregate area of 16 square feet per individual sign and 80 square feet cumulative total area for all signs on a property. Individual signs must be placed a minimum of ten feet (10’) apart from each other.

SECTION 4: The Community Development Director is authorized to ministerially update the Citywide Sign Guidelines to be consistent with this amendment.

SECTION 5: All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 6: If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 7., Item Page 2, Packet Page 39 competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 7: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days from and after its final passage and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 7., Item Page 3, Packet Page 40 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Jason Bradley, General Services Field Operations Manager SUBJECT: Award a Job Order Contract in the Amount of $150,000 to Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. for Presidio of Monterey Pest Control Services ***IGSA*** (Categorically Excluded from NEPA 32 CFR, Part 651, Section II(g)(1), CEQA Not a Project) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Approving the Call for Bids for the Presidio of
Monterey Pest Control Services (“Project”), and
granting the Public Works Director, or their
designee, the authority to approve all
amendments and addenda thereto as
necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Rejecting all non-responsive bids;

3. Accepting all responsive, responsible bids;

4. Awarding a Contract for the Grand Total Bid to
the lowest responsive, responsible bidder,
Mary’s Pest Control, Inc., with a term of one year
with the option to renew for two additional oneyear terms, and with a not to exceed annual funding limit of $150,000; and,

5. Authorizing the City Manager, or their designee,
to execute the contract upon the receipt of the
information required by the Call for Bids.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Protect and preserve our natural environment by
addressing climate change through ecologically
Agenda Report Highlights
• The City of Monterey plans to award
a $150,000 annual contract to
Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. for pest
control services at the Presidio of
Monterey and Ord Military
Community.
• The contract includes bi-monthly
inspections, routine maintenance,
and as-needed callback services to
address pest-related issues.
• The project is fully funded by the
U.S. Army through an
Intergovernmental Support
Agreement (IGSA) with the City of
Monterey.
• Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. was
selected as the lowest responsive
and responsible bidder with a bid of
$60,000.
• The contract may be extended for
up to four additional one-year terms
based on successful performance.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 8.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 1, Packet Page 41 №11/25
responsible and pragmatic solutions.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This Project is consistent with the City Council’s Value Drivers and Strategic Priorities of Quality of Life – “Recognize that public safety is a priority to ensure that our City is safe and welcoming to all, contributing to our economic vitality as a destination City”, Fiscal Stewardship – “Support our military installations (U.S. Army Garrison Presidio of Monterey, Naval Support Activity Monterey, and U.S. Coast Guard Station Monterey) as significant economic drivers in the region, and Protecting Our Environment – “Protect the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and our environmental assets from pollution.”
This action is consistent with the City’s policy to provide services to the U.S. Department of the Army through the Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA) between the City of Monterey and the Federal Government.

This action is also consistent with Chapter 28-Purchasing of the City Code, which requires service contract awards exceeding $75,000 to be approved by City Council.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

On November 18, 2025, four (4) bids were received, but only two (2) bids were deemed responsive and responsible and were opened by the Finance Director’s designee as follows:

Bidder Grand Total Bid
Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. $60,000
Clark Pest Control of Stockton, Inc. $72,315
Sentry Pest Solutions Non-Responsive
PestKiller Services Non-Responsive
The Grand Total Bid, as shown on the attached Bid Tabulation, represents the total costs of representative work items typical of pest control services, quantified for bidding purposes only, and does not encompass all the work that may be completed under the contract. The total notto-exceed award amount for the contract is $150,000 annually. There is no minimum dollar value of work guaranteed under this on-call contract and assignment of work orders is at the sole discretion of the City.

This action does not appropriate any funding. Any projects constructed under this on-call contract will be fully funded by the U.S. Army through the IGSA within current appropriations.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

II(g)(1) Routine repair and maintenance of buildings, airfields, grounds, equipment, and other facilities. Examples include, but are not limited to: Removal and disposal of asbestos-containing Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 2, Packet Page 42 №11/25
material (for example, roof material and floor tile) or lead-based paint in accordance with applicable regulations; removal of dead, diseased, or damaged trees; and repair of roofs, doors, windows, or fixtures (REC required for removal and disposal of ACM and LBP or work on historic structures).

All screening conditions in 32 CFR 651.29 have been met. No circumstances exist that would require an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA.

CEQA applies to discretionary projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (a).) CEQA does not apply to ministerial projects. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (b)(1).) There is a recognized policy consideration underlying the distinction between ministerial and discretionary projects. The purpose of CEQA is to minimize the adverse effects of new construction on the environment. To trigger CEQA compliance, the discretion must be of a certain kind; it must provide the agency with the ability and authority to mitigate environmental damage to some degree. Unless a public agency can shape the project in a way that would respond to concerns raised in an EIR, or its functional equivalent, environmental review would be a meaningless exercise.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

Council could choose not to award the contract for the Project; however, this is not recommended as the Project is sufficiently funded and implements necessary maintenance critical to the Army’s Mission Objective.

DISCUSSION:

Overview
Under an Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA), the City of Monterey provides services to the Department of the U.S. Army, which are fully reimbursed by the Federal government. The City coordinates a variety of projects on the Presidio of Monterey and Ord Military Community, including this project to provide pest control services.

Project
Pest related preventative maintenance, including routine inspections and regular applications of safe and effective pesticides, is vital when it comes to pest control. Completing these scheduled and preemptive measures assist with preventing infestations, protecting properties from costly damage, and improving the overall health and wellbeing of individuals by eliminating potential diseases spread by common pests.

The scope of work for this on-call contract includes bi-monthly inspections and maintenance and as-needed callback services at various buildings located throughout the Presidio of Monterey, including Ord Military Community. The contract will allow for the quickest possible response to Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 3, Packet Page 43 №11/25
urgent pest concerns and will ensure the best possible response by qualified specialists who have experience with pest-related matters.

The publicly advertised call for bids contained Bid Schedules whereupon bidders were required to list rates for routine pest control items including bi-monthly preventative maintenance and hourly labor rates to address out of cycle pest issues/concerns.

This project initially went out to bid and received three (3) bids on October 14, 2025; however all bidders failed to submit the required bid bonds, and all bids were rejected. A second bid solicitation was opened on November 18, 2025, and the City received four (4) bid proposals, but only two (2) were deemed responsive and responsible, and opened by the City. The other two bidders, Sentry Pest Solutions and PestKiller Services, were deemed non-responsive for failure to submit the required bid bonds. The basis for determining the low bidder is the Grand Total Bid, and Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. is the low bidder, with a bid of $60,000.

Since this contract is based upon unit prices and not a specific project, an Engineer’s Estimate was not prepared for comparison. However, the bid amount submitted by Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. is comparable with the previous contract prices adjusted for inflation.

The contract shall remain in effect for all written work orders issued by the City during a 12- month period beginning with the effective date of the Notice to Proceed or until the exhaustion of the contract limit, whichever occurs first. With successful performance, this contract may be extended up to four additional 12-month periods with the same annual contract limit. These contracts do not give the contractors exclusive rights to perform all work done for the City.

Certain projects may be performed by City crews or be issued for bid proposals throughout the term of the contract, even if such contracts include this same type of work.

AR/jb/cg
Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Evaluation Tabulation
e: Mary’s Pest Control, Inc.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 4, Packet Page 44 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING A JOB ORDER CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $150,000 TO MARY’S PEST CONTROL, INC. FOR PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY PEST CONTROL SERVICES ***IGSA*** WHEREAS, on the 18th day of November 2025, at 2:00 p.m. the City of Monterey Finance Director’s designee received four (4) electronic bids through the City’s e-Procurement Portal, OpenGov Procurement, for the Presidio of Monterey Pest Control Services (“Project”); WHEREAS, Sentry Pest Solutions and PestKiller Services were deemed non-responsive for failure to submit the required bid bonds;
WHEREAS, Mary’s Pest Control, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive, responsible bid in the amount of $60,000;
WHEREAS, the basis of award for the project was the Grand Total Bid; WHEREAS, the project is fully funded by the Department of the Army through the Intergovernmental Support Agreement (IGSA); and,
WHEREAS, the proposed action has been reviewed in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and determined to qualify for a Categorical Exclusion (CX).

All screening conditions in 32 CFR 651.29 have been met. No circumstances exist that would require an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 5, Packet Page 45 Here, the City does not have the power to deny or condition the permit, or otherwise modify the project in ways which would mitigate environmental problems an environmental impact report might conceivably have identified. The City does not have the authority to dictate changes to the Army’s project’s design or location in response to any impacts that an environmental review might reveal, the City’s authority under CEQA is essentially ministerial and therefore no further environmental review is required by the City;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Approves the Call for Bids for the Presidio of Monterey Pest Control Services (“Project”), and granting the Public Works Director, or their designee, the authority to approve all amendments and addenda thereto as necessitated by conditions in the field;

2. Rejects all non-responsive bids;

3. Accepts all responsive, responsible bids;

4. Awards a Contract for the Grand Total Bid to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Mary’s Pest Control, Inc., with a term of one year with the option to renew for two additional one-year terms, and with a not to exceed annual funding limit of $150,000; and,

5. Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the contract upon the receipt of the information required by the Call for Bids.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 6, Packet Page 46 City of Monterey
Public Works
Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
580 Pacific Street, Monterey, CA 93940

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
REBID: PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY PEST CONTROL SERVICES
RESPONSE DEADLINE: November 18, 2025 at 2:00 pm
Report Generated: Tuesday, November 18, 2025

SELECTED VENDOR TOTALS
Vendor Total
Sentry Pest Solutions $21,725.00
Mary's Pest Control Inc $60,000.00
Clark Pest Control of
Stockton Inc.
$72,315.00
PestKiller Services $140,938.00

BID SCHEDULE A
Vendor Total
Sentry Pest Solutions $21,600.00
Mary's Pest Control Inc $60,000.00
Clark Pest Control of
Stockton Inc.
$72,000.00
PestKiller Services $140,688.00

BID SCHEDULE B
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 7, Packet Page 47

EVALUATION TABULATION
GEN No. TBD
REBID: PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY PEST CONTROL SERVICES

EVALUATION TABULATION
General Solicitation - REBID: PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY PEST CONTROL SERVICES

Page 2 ends

Vendor Total
Mary's Pest Control Inc $0.00
Sentry Pest Solutions $125.00
PestKiller Services $250.00
Clark Pest Control of
Stockton Inc.
$315.00
ATTACHMENT 2
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 8., Item Page 8, Packet Page 48 Council
Agenda Report
№12/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cody Hennings, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Order Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Alvarado Street Maintenance District No. 85-1 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution
ordering the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the Alvarado Street
Maintenance District 85-1. This is a property-based
district in which liability for the assessment is premised upon a person’s property ownership.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources
through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining
operations, reasonable revenue enhancements,
visionary long-term planning, fiscal transparency, and
community partnerships. Serve as stewards of the City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality
efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue
enhancements, visionary long-term planning, fiscal
transparency, and community partnerships.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with previous City Council
actions and will begin the process for establishing an
annual assessment to repair and maintain
improvements, and to add these improvements as
necessary to meet the intent of the District’s formation.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

Agenda Report Highlights
• The City Council is recommended to
adopt a resolution to prepare an
Engineer’s Report for the Alvarado
Street Maintenance District for fiscal
year 2026-2027.
• The assessment will fund
maintenance and improvements on
Alvarado Street, with costs allocated
based on special benefits to
property owners.
• The current assessment rate is
$4.65 per lineal foot per month,
which may change based on service
levels and additional projects.
• If the maintenance district is not
reestablished, the City will lose
dedicated funds for enhanced
improvements, potentially impacting
downtown character and commerce.
• A public hearing will be scheduled to
review the Engineer’s Report before
confirming the assessment and
district boundaries.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 9.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 9., Item Page 1, Packet Page 49 №11/25
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

A meeting with representatives of the District will be held to discuss the special benefits conferred and an appropriate assessment rate for 2026-2027. This information will be used to generate the report. The assessment pays for all aspects of the work program for 2026-2027.

The City has historically contributed funds to the District to cover general benefit services.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could decide not to proceed with the reestablishment of this District. However, the assessment pays for maintenance of enhanced improvements that add to the character of downtown and support commerce. If the maintenance district were to expire without being annually re-imposed, then the City would not have dedicated funds to maintain the enhanced improvements on Alvarado Street at the same level of service. Additionally, if in the future the City wishes to re-create a maintenance district it would require the additional work to establish a new maintenance district, including conducting a vote by the property owners, which could fail.

DISCUSSION:

The Alvarado Street Maintenance District (District) was established in 1985 under the 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act (Streets and Highways Code section 22500 et seq.), which authorizes assessments to install, construct and maintain landscaping, lighting and park and recreational facilities, including graffiti removal. The boundaries of the District include the entire length of Alvarado Street. Staff will meet with representatives of the District to determine the suitable level of service and calculate an acceptable assessment for the next fiscal year. The current assessment is $4.65/lineal foot/month and next year’s rate may vary depending on the desired level of service or additional projects that the District wishes to pursue.

Staff recommends that the City Council order the preparation of the Engineer’s Report. The report will evaluate the costs and determine the appropriate allocation for each beneficiary of the proposed improvements. The Engineer’s Report separates the general benefits to the public at large from the special benefits the assessed parcels will receive. Property based assessments may only be used to pay for the special benefits provided by the improvements and activities of a district and may not be used to pay for general benefits (California Constitution Art XIIID §4(a).) Therefore, the Engineer’s Report must separate and quantify the special and general benefits and assess property owners only for the portion of the cost representing special benefits.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 9., Item Page 2, Packet Page 50 №11/25
At a future Council meeting, the City Council will be asked to receive the report and set a time for a public hearing regarding the contents of the report. After the public hearing, Council will be asked to adopt a resolution confirming the assessment and the district boundaries. The resolution will be filed with the County Auditor’s office prior to the August 1, 2026 deadline established by the County Auditor.

AR/ch/ap
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Sabrina Hiltunen, Executive Director, Old Monterey Business Association (OMBA) Rafaela King, Finance Director
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 9., Item Page 3, Packet Page 51 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
ORDERING ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 ALVARADO STREET MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 85-1
WHEREAS, the Alvarado Street Maintenance District (District) was established in 1985 under the 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act (Streets and Highways Code section 22500 et seq.), which authorizes assessments to install, construct and maintain landscaping, lighting and park and recreational facilities, including graffiti removal on Alvarado Street; WHEREAS, the District funds maintenance which contributes to a clean and safe environment conducive to commerce;
WHEREAS, Street & Highways Code section 22567 requires an Engineer’s Report to (1) contain plans and specifications for the improvements; (2) an estimated cost of the improvements; (3) a diagram for the assessment district; and (4) an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements;
WHEREAS, all parcels that receive a special benefit are included in the District and the cost of the benefits are reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels according to special benefits;
WHEREAS, general benefits available to the public at large are not paid from special assessments; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby orders the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the Alvarado Street Maintenance District No. 85-1 to analyze and separate the general benefits to the public at large from the special benefits the assessed parcels will receive and other information required by the Streets & Highways Code.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 9., Item Page 4, Packet Page 52 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 9., Item Page 5, Packet Page 53 Council
Agenda Report
№12/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, PE, PTOE, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cody Hennings, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Order Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Calle Principal Maintenance District No. 00-1 (Not a project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution
ordering the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 for the Calle Principal
Maintenance District 00-1. This is a property-based
district in which liability for the assessment is premised upon a person’s property ownership
VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

Agenda Report Highlights
• The City Council is recommended to
adopt a resolution to prepare an
Engineer’s Report for the Calle
Principal Maintenance District for
fiscal year 2026-2027.
• The District was established under
the 1972 Landscape and Lighting
Act to fund maintenance and
improvements like landscaping,
lighting, and graffiti removal.
• The Engineer’s Report will evaluate
costs, separate general and special
benefits, and determine
assessments for property owners
based on special benefits.
• If the District is not reestablished,
dedicated funds for maintenance
and enhancements will be lost,
impacting downtown character and
commerce.
• A public hearing will be scheduled to
review the report before confirming
the assessment and district
boundaries.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 10.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 10., Item Page 1, Packet Page 54 №11/25
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

City Council could decide not to proceed with the reestablishment of this District. However, the assessment pays for maintenance of improvements that add to the character of the downtown and support commerce. If the maintenance district were to expire without being annually reimposed, then the City would not have dedicated funds to maintain the enhancements to the same level of service. Additionally, if in the future the City wishes to recreate a maintenance district it would require the additional work of establishing a new maintenance district, including conducting a vote by the property owners, which could fail to pass.

DISCUSSION:

The Calle Principal Maintenance District (District) was established in 2000 under the 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act (Streets and Highways Code section 22500 et seq.), which authorizes assessments to install, construct, and maintain landscaping, lighting and park and recreational facilities, including graffiti removal. The boundaries of the District include the entire length of Calle Principal. Staff will meet with representatives of the District to determine the suitable level of service and calculate an acceptable assessment for the next fiscal year. The current assessment is $0.57/lineal foot/month, and next year’s rate may vary depending on the desired level of service or additional projects that the District wishes to pursue.

Staff recommends that the City Council order the preparation of the Engineer’s Report. The report will evaluate the costs and determine the appropriate allocation for each beneficiary of the proposed improvements. The Engineer’s Report separates the general benefits to the public at large from the special benefits the assessed parcels will receive. Property-based assessments may only be used to pay for the special benefits provided by the improvements and activities of a district and may not be used to pay for general benefits (California Constitution Art XIIID §4(a).) Therefore, the Engineer’s Report must separate and quantify the special and general benefits and assess property owners only for the portion of the cost representing special benefits.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 10., Item Page 2, Packet Page 55 №11/25
At a future Council meeting, the City Council will be asked to receive the report and set a time for a public hearing regarding the contents of the report. After the public hearing, Council will be asked to adopt a resolution confirming the assessment and the district boundaries. The resolution would be filed with the County Auditor’s office prior to the August 1, 2026 deadline established by the County Auditor.

AR/ch/ap
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Sabrina Hiltunen, Executive Director, Old Monterey Business Association (OMBA) Rafaela King, Finance Director
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 10., Item Page 3, Packet Page 56 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
ORDERING ENGINEER’S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CALLE PRINCIPAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 00-1
WHEREAS, the Calle Principal Maintenance District (District) was established in 2000 under the 1972 Landscaping and Lighting Act (Streets & Highways Code section 22500 et seq.) which authorizes the assessment to install, construct, and maintain landscaping, lighting, and park and recreational facilities, including graffiti removal; WHEREAS, Street & Highways Code section 22567 requires an Engineer’s Report to (1) contain plans and specifications for the improvements; (2) an estimated cost of the improvements; (3) a diagram for the assessment district; and (4) an assessment of the estimated costs of the improvements;
WHEREAS, all parcels that receive a special benefit are included in the District and the cost of the benefits are reasonably apportioned among the benefitted parcels according to special benefits;
WHEREAS, general benefits available to the public at large are not paid from special assessments;
WHEREAS, the District funds maintenance which contributes to a clean and safe environment conducive to commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby orders the preparation of an Engineer’s Report for 2026-2027 for the Calle Principal Maintenance District No. 00-1 with the information required by the Streets & Highways Code.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 10., Item Page 4, Packet Page 57 PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 10., Item Page 5, Packet Page 58 Council
Agenda Report
№12/25
FROM: Andrea Renny, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Cristie Steffy, Parking Superintendent
SUBJECT: Award a Contract to ComSonics, Inc. for the Purchase of an Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) Camera System and Associated Software and Services for the Parking Division in an Amount Not to Exceed $182,255.27 (Not a Project Under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and Under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution:

1. Awarding a contract to ComSonics, Inc. for the
procurement, installation, and first-year software,
maintenance, and warranty services of a mobile
Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR)
camera system for the Parking Division, utilizing
an existing competitively bid contract awarded by
the City of Seal Beach and the Federal General
Services Administration (GSA), in an amount not
to exceed $182,255.27; and

2. Authorizing the City Manager, or their designee,
to execute the contract upon receipt of
information required by the contract.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Serve as stewards of City’s financial resources through sound economic vitality efforts, streamlining operations, reasonable revenue enhancements, visionary long-term
planning, fiscal transparency and community
partnerships.

Foster a local government that is transparent and
collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates
input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

This action is consistent with Monterey City Code 28-
25(c)(d) allowing piggyback purchases when another
governmental agency has conducted a competitive
procurement process that meets California public contracting requirements. The purchase supports the City’s parking management and enforcement policies by enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and data-driven decision-making.

Agenda Report Highlights
• The City Council is recommended to
approve a contract with ComSonics,
Inc. for the purchase and installation
of six mobile ALPR camera systems
and associated services for the
Parking Division for $182,255.27.
• Funding for the purchase will come
from the Parking Fund Capital
Improvement Project account, which
has sufficient funds available.
• The ALPR system will enhance
parking enforcement efficiency,
permit compliance, and operational
data accuracy while reducing
manual checks.
• The purchase will utilize a
piggyback contract from the City of
Seal Beach, avoiding the need for a
new competitive procurement
process.
• ALPR data will be managed and
protected in compliance with the
City’s approved ALPR Policy and
state law.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 11.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 11., Item Page 1, Packet Page 59 №11/25
CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The total cost of the ALPR system purchase, including hardware, software subscriptions, installation, training, maintenance, extended warranty, and applicable sales tax, is $182,255.27.

Funding for this purchase will come from the Parking Fund Capital Improvement Project (CIP) account CIP2315. As of January 23, 2026, the project account balance is $300,000; sufficient funding is available for this request. The Parking Fund is an Enterprise fund and will be the only funding source used for this contract. Ongoing annual software and maintenance costs will be included in future Parking Division operating budgets.

The ALPR Camera system and associated software and services will be purchased from ComSonics, Inc. utilizing a piggyback contract from the City of Seal Beach pursuant to the purchasing policy and procedures as authorized Monterey City Code section 28-25(c)(d).

Finance approved the piggyback purchase request on October 8, 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City could conduct a new formal competitive procurement process. This alternative is not recommended because it would delay implementation of the technology needed and duplicate a procurement process already completed by another public agency.

Council could defer the purchase of ALPR technology. This alternative is not recommended because it would limit the Parking Division’s ability to efficiently enforce parking regulations and manage permit programs.

DISCUSSION:

The Parking Division utilizes Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) technology to support efficient parking enforcement, permit compliance, overtime monitoring, and parkingrelated operational data necessary for enforcement and program administration. ALPR systems improve accuracy, reduce staff time spent on manual checks, and enhance overall customer service while maintaining consistent enforcement citywide. ALPR data is collected and used solely for authorized Parking Division purposes and is managed, retained and protected in accordance with the City’s Council approved ALPR Policy and applicable state law.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 11., Item Page 2, Packet Page 60 №11/25
To meet current operational needs, staff proposes the purchase of six mobile ALPR units with associated software, installation, training, and support services from ComSonics, Inc. The system will integrate with existing parking enforcement operations and provide improved data accuracy, reporting, and operational efficiency. This purchase will be completed through a piggyback contract. Piggybacking allows the City to utilize a competitively bid contract awarded by another governmental agency, avoiding the time and expense of issuing a separate solicitation.

The City of Seal Beach conducted a formal Invitation to Bid process and awarded a contract to ComSonics, Inc. for ALPR systems and supporting equipment. In addition, the pricing is available through the Federal General Services Administration (GSA) Schedule. The City of Monterey’s Finance Department reviewed and approved the piggyback purchase request on October 8, 2025.

AR/cs
Attachments: 1. Resolution
e: Mikle Nesselrodt, ComSonics, Inc.

Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 11., Item Page 3, Packet Page 61 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
AWARDING CONTRACT TO COMSONICS, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN

AUTOMATED LICENSE PLATE RECOGNITION (ALPR) CAMERA SYSTEM AND ASSOCIATED SOFTWARE AND SERVICES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $182,255.27 WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Parking Division utilizes technology to support efficient parking enforcement, permit compliance, overtime monitoring, and parking-related operational reporting;
WHEREAS, Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) technology improves operational efficiency, accuracy and customer service while supporting consistent enforcement of parking regulations;
WHEREAS, the City of Seal Beach conducted a formal competitive procurement process and awarded a contract to ComSonics, Inc. for Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) systems and supporting equipment and services;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Finance Department reviewed and approved a piggyback purchase request for the procurement of ALPR equipment and services from ComSonics, Inc.;
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey Finance Department reviewed and approved a piggyback purchase request for the procurement of ALPR equipment and services from ComSonics, Inc.;
WHEREAS, sufficient funding for this purchase is available within the Parking Fund Capital Improvement Project (CIP) account CIP2315, and no General Fund monies are required; and, WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.;

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 11., Item Page 4, Packet Page 62

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:

1. Awards a piggyback contract to ComSonics, Inc. for the procurement, installation, and first-year software, maintenance, and warranty services of a mobile Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) camera system utilizing an existing competitively awarded contract from the City of Seal Beach, in an amount not to exceed $182,255.27; and

2. Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute the contract and any related documents necessary to implement this resolution, subject to receipt and approval of all required documents
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 11., Item Page 5, Packet Page 63 Council
Agenda Report
№12/25
FROM: Kimberly Cole, AICP, Community Development Director Prepared By: Janna Aldrete, Property Manager
SUBJECT: Appoint Agency Negotiators for Conference with Real Property Negotiators Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8; Property: 160 Municipal Wharf #2 and Approximately 3,238 Square Feet of Area Located Under the Wharf #2 Warehouse; Agency Negotiators: Kimberly Cole and Janna Aldrete; Negotiating Parties: Art Seavey and Amanda Fay (Monterey Abalone Company); Under Negotiation: Price and Terms of Payment for Lease Amendment (Not a Project under CEQA per Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061)
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council appoint agency negotiators for
conference with real property negotiators pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.8 to discuss and provide
confidential direction for terms and conditions for a lease amendment with the Monterey Abalone Company.

VALUE DRIVERS:

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

City Council approval is required for real estate transactions.

Closed session confidential review of real estate matters is allowed.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE ACT)
APPLIES: It does not apply to the appointment of agency negotiations, but it does apply to the underlying lease negotiations.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

There are no fiscal implications related to the recommendation to appoint agency negotiators.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 CEQA Guidelines Article Agenda Report Highlights
• The City Council is recommended to
appoint agency negotiators to
discuss a lease amendment with
Monterey Abalone Company.
• Monterey Abalone Company leases
3,944 square feet at Municipal
Wharf #2, including warehouse
space and underwater areas for
aquaculture.
• The lease amendment will address
price and terms of payment, with
closed session discussions allowed
for confidentiality.
• Monterey Abalone Company is a
well-established aquaculture
business providing fresh seafood
locally and nationwide.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 12.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 12., Item Page 1, Packet Page 64 №11/25
20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could decide not to appoint negotiators or to appoint different negotiators. This is not recommended by staff. It is appropriate that the City Council appoint agency negotiators and authorize a confidential discussion regarding a lease amendment.

DISCUSSION:

Monterey Abalone Company currently leases a total of 3,944 square feet at Municipal Wharf #2.

This includes 706 square feet in the warehouse and 3,238 square feet of area located underneath the warehouse. The area underneath the warehouse consists of catwalks and cages, where the abalone are raised in their natural environment.

Monterey Abalone Company (“Monterey Abalone”) is a well-established aquaculture business owned by Ms. Amanda Fay and Mr. Art Seavey. The company provides a unique use at Wharf #2 and has been able to survive a declining business sector. Monterey Abalone is a popular Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 12., Item Page 2, Packet Page 65 №11/25
Wharf #2 business supplying fresh seafood to residents, restaurants, and tourists. In addition, Monterey Abalone ships nationwide and abalone may be ordered through their website.

Monterey Abalone is currently occupying space in the Wharf #2 warehouse under a lease that was entered into in 2021. Closed session discussions are allowed and appropriate for confidential direction in real estate matters of this type. e: Art Seavey, Monterey Abalone Company
Amanda Fay, Monterey Abalone Company
KC/ja/ad
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 12., Item Page 3, Packet Page 66 Council
Agenda Report
№11/25
FROM: Christine Davi, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Appoint Dante G. Hall as City Manager, Approve Employment Contract, and Amend the City’s Full-Time Salary Schedule (Not a Project under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt the attached resolution to
appoint Dante G. Hall as City Manager, authorize the Mayor to sign the employment agreement, and amend the City’s
full-time salary schedule.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Develop and Retain a Quality Workforce - Provide sufficient resources and support to develop, retain, and recruit a high quality city workforce.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Monterey City Charter section 5.1 authorizes the City
Council to directly appoint its City Manager.

City Manager contracts that include compensation are to be approved in an open session and agendized as a separate item at a regular City Council meeting. (Government Code sections 54956(b); 54957(b)(4).) The City is required to orally report a summary of a recommendation for final
action on the salary of a local agency executive such as the City Manager. (Government Code section 54953(c)(3).)

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: Yes.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

The proposed contract provides Mr. Hall with a base salary of $320,000, a 3% cost of living increase in FY26-27 and FY27-28, deferred compensation matching contribution of $500 per month, and $15,000 for relocation fees. Other benefits, such as health insurance and retirement benefits, match those provided in the Monterey Executive Management Employee Association contract.

Agenda Report Highlights
• Dante G. Hall is recommended for
appointment as Monterey's City
Manager following a nationwide
recruitment process.
• The proposed employment
contract includes a $320,000 base
salary, annual cost-of-living
increases, and relocation
assistance.
• Mr. Hall has over 17 years of
municipal government experience,
including leadership roles in
various cities.
• The City Council is authorized to
appoint the City Manager and
approve compensation in an open
session per the Monterey City
Charter and Government Code.
• Mr. Hall holds advanced degrees
and certifications in public
administration and policy.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 13.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 1, Packet Page 67 №11/25
The salary for the first year will be prorated based on the start date which is anticipated to be April 4, 2026. The chart below demonstrates the costing information without adjusting for the starting date:

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

This recommendation follows previous closed session direction and decisions.

DISCUSSION:

Mr. Hall brings to the City of Monterey more than 17 years of experience working for full-service cities. He currently serves as City Manager in the City of Hercules.

Prior to his employment with the City of Hercules, he held a variety of positions in other cities such as Assistant City Manager, Interim City Manager, Acting Public Works Director, Acting Parks and Recreation Director, Community Development Director, Redevelopment and Housing Administrator, Deputy City Manager for Community Development, Assistant Director of Community Development, Housing and Grant Manager, and Community Development Block Grant Program Manager.

Throughout Mr. Hall’s career in municipal government, he has led diverse teams, managed complex budgets, and built strong partnerships across departments, agencies, and community organizations. Mr. Hall has advanced infrastructure projects, enhanced public safety, and promoted economic development while maintaining transparency and fiscal responsibility.

FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 27-28
Salary $ 320,000.00 $ 329,600.00 $ 339,488.00
Benefits $ 37,157.84 $ 37,157.84 $ 37,157.84
PERS Classic 8.98% $ 28,736.00 $ 28,736.00 $ 28,736.00
$ 385,893.84 $ 395,493.84 $ 405,381.84
Relocation $ 15,000.00
$ 400,893.84
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 2, Packet Page 68 №11/25
He holds a Master of Public Administration degree from Marxe School of Public and International Affairs at City University of New York - Baruch, in New York, New York, and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Social Work from Azusa Pacific University, in Azuza, California.

Mr. Hall is an International City/County Management Association (ICMA) Credentialed Manager.

Additionally, he holds a public policy program certificate from Harvard Kennedy School of Public Policy, and a Davenport Institute for Public Engagement Certificate from Pepperdine School of Public Policy.

Mr. Hall’s selection as Monterey’s next City Manager follows a rigorous nationwide recruitment process with many qualified candidates.

Attachments: 1. Resolution

2. Draft Employment Agreement
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 3, Packet Page 69 RESOLUTION NO. __-___ C.S.

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY
№011/24
APPOINTING DANTE G. HALL AS CITY MANAGER, APPROVING THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT, AND AMENDING THE CITY’S FULL TIME SALARY SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the City of Monterey desires to appoint Dante G. Hall as City Manager; WHEREAS, the City of Monterey desires to retain Mr. Hall as City Manager under an employment contract;
WHEREAS, Mr. Hall has accepted the City Council’s offer of employment as City Manager; and
WHEREAS, the City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY that it hereby:
(1) appoints Dante G. Hall to the City Manager position; (2) authorizes the Mayor to execute the Employment Contract; and (3) amends the full-time salary schedule to reflect the base salary for the City Manager position of $320,000.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY this _____ day of _______, 202_, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 4, Packet Page 70 APPROVED:

ATTEST:

Mayor of said City
City Clerk thereof
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 5, Packet Page 71 ATTACHMENT 2
City of Monterey

CITY MANAGER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) is made this 3rd Day of February, 2026, by and between the CITY OF MONTEREY, a municipal corporation (“City”), and DANTE G. HALL (“Hall”).

TERMS

1. Appointment of City Manager:

The City appointed Hall to the position of City Manager on February 3, 2026 subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, and Hall accepts such terms and conditions.

2. Term of Agreement:

The Agreement is effective April 4, 2026, until April 30, 2029, at which time it shall expire.

3. Duties and Responsibilities
a. Hall is an at will employee who shall serve at the pleasure of the City Council. b. As City Manager, Hall shall perform the functions, duties, and powers of City Manager, as specified in the Monterey City Charter, the City Code, the job description, and any other applicable ordinances, resolutions, policies, and customs of the City, and perform all other duties and responsibilities as shall from time to time be duly assigned by the City Council.

Hall shall at all times faithfully and diligently perform all of the duties and responsibilities, and powers so vested, delegated, or assigned, and he shall obey all laws of the United States, the State of California, and the City of Monterey. c. Hall agrees to devote his full productive time, ability, and attention to the City’s business during the term of this Agreement. Hall shall not hold secondary employment, and shall be employed exclusively by the City.

4. City Manager Appointment and Removal Authority:

Hall may appoint and review employees of the City Manager’s Office, as provided in the City Charter, subject to appropriate budgetary authority and Chapter 25 of the City Code.

5. Termination of Employment and Severance:
a. Pursuant to Article 4, Section 4.4 of the City Charter, the City Council may remove Hall without cause stated or hearing by a vote of four (4) members, and may remove Hall for “cause” after a hearing by a vote of three (3) of its members. “Cause” means fair and honest reasons, regulated by good faith on the part of the City, that are not trivial, arbitrary or capricious, unrelated to business needs or goals, or pretextual, and cause may Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 6, Packet Page 72 ATTACHMENT 2
include, but is not limited to, “Reasons for Discipline” set forth in City Code Chapter 25, Section 14.02, or any successor City personnel rules, or other good cause. b. In the event the City discharges Hall without cause prior to nine months from the expiration of the term of this Agreement, Hall shall be entitled to receive compensation, consisting of a lump-sum payment of nine months of base salary. In the event the City discharges Hall without cause, within nine months of the expiration of the terms of this Agreement, Hall shall be entitled to receive compensation consisting of a lump-sum payment for each remaining month of his base salary, up to a maximum of nine months of base salary. In accordance with Government Code § 53261, a cash severance payment shall not include any other non-cash item, except health benefits, which shall be continued on behalf of Hall for the same duration of the time covered in the severance payment. This section shall be construed in accordance with Government Code § 53260 which explicitly limits contractual severance cash settlement payable by a local agency employer.
c. The severance payment described in Section 5(b) will release the City from any further obligations under this Agreement, and any claims of any nature that Hall might have against the City by virtue of his employment or termination thereof. Contemporaneously, with the delivery of the severance payment and in consideration therefore, Hall agrees to execute and deliver to the City a release of all claims that Hall may have against the City, to include a Civil Code § 1542 waiver.
d. Hall shall not be entitled to severance pay in the following events:
i. Discharge for cause
ii. City elects not to renew this Agreement
iii. Hall dies or becomes disabled to the extent that he cannot perform the full range of the essential functions of his position, with or without reasonable accommodations, as determined by his treating physician and through an interactive process with Human Resources
iv. Hall resigns from his position as City Manager

6. Base Salary:

City agrees to pay Hall for his services rendered pursuant to this Agreement an annual base salary of $320,000, payable on a bi-monthly basis in the same manner as other employees of the City are paid. Effective April 16, 2027, the base salary shall be increased by three percent (3.0%).

Effective April 16, 2028, the base salary shall be increased by three percent (3.0%).

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 7, Packet Page 73 ATTACHMENT 2

7. Benefits:
a. The City shall provide Hall with the Toyota Camry Hybrid or a similar vehicle for his business use and incidental personal use. The City shall maintain the automobile in a safe and good working condition and maintain an automobile liability insurance policy on the automobile with Hall as a named insured. The City shall fully pay or reimburse Hall for expenses incurred in the maintenance and use of said automobile. Hall shall record mileage incurred during incidental personal use and commute trips for calculation of taxable benefits.
b. Hall shall participate in the 2.7% at 55 California Public Employees Retirement System plan. Hall shall be responsible for the employee’s 8% contribution to the plan and will cost share 3% of the City’s required contribution to the plan for a total employee contribution of 11%.
c. Hall shall receive 80 hours of “use it or lose it” management leave each calendar year, prorated to an initial receipt of 60 hours for the remainder of 2026. This management leave has no cash value.
d. Hall shall receive one hundred eighty four (184) hours vacation leave accrual per year.

Vacation shall not accrue in excess of 320 hours. Once Hall reaches this accrual limit of 320 hours, Hall shall not accrue additional vacation. Vacation accrual based on Hall's accrual rates shall commence only after Hall has utilized vacation and accrual banks are below the 320 maximum allowed.

Hall may cash-out vacation accrual in excess of 280 hours once per year, either at the end of the fiscal year or at the end of the calendar year. Exact cash out dates to be determined by Finance. Vacation accruals may be cashed out upon separation from City employment.
e. Hall shall receive sick leave as provided in Monterey City Code § 25-12.02. f. Hall shall receive family leave as provided in Monterey City Code § 25-12.03. g. Hall shall receive paid holidays as provided in Monterey City Cod § 25-12.04. h. Hall shall receive jury duty leave as provided in Monterey City Code § 25-12.05. i. City agrees to provide Hall with a Group Term Life Insurance policy in the amount of $65,000, and voluntary participation in a Supplemental Life Insurance policy subject to carrier limits paid by Hall through payroll deduction.
j. City agrees to match up to $250 per pay period ($500 per month) to a City authorized Deferred Compensation Plan authorized under Internal Revenue Code Section 457.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 8, Packet Page 74 ATTACHMENT 2
k. Hall shall be eligible to participate in the City’s Fitness Activity Plan (i.e., may accrue 10 hours of leave time per quarter up to 80 hours maximum per the Fitness Activity Plan policy.) Participation in this plan is voluntary and subject to the terms and condition of the plan as provided in the Monterey Executive Management Employees’ Association (MEMEA) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
l. Hall shall receive the City’s short term/long term disability insurance plan subject to carrier limits.
m. Hall shall be eligible to participate in the City’s wellness program (i.e. Sports Center fitness pass) subject to the terms and conditions as provided in the MEMEA MOU. n. Hall shall be eligible to participate in the City’s Section 125 programs subject to Internal Revenue Service regulations. Hall will pay any administration fee for this service through payroll deduction.
o. Hall shall be eligible to participate in the City’s dental/orthodontia insurance plan, and shall receive the same employer contribution and benefits as other full-time employees. p. City shall provide vision care coverage for Hall and his eligible dependents. The plan will provide for expenses incurred up to the annual maximums described in the plan description.
q. Hall shall participate in the City’s Cafeteria plan. The City will contribute a monthly sum to the employee’s Health Plan Spending Fund (HPSF) based on the employee’s participation in the Public Employees Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA). The HPSF amounts are subject to the amounts as provided in the MEMEA MOU. r. Hall shall be eligible for cell phone allowance up to $780 per year. s. Hall shall be eligible to participate in the Legal Services plan. Participation in this plan is voluntary, and the monthly premium shall be paid by the employee through payroll deduction.
t. Hall shall be eligible to participate in the Employee Assistance Plan, and shall receive the same employer contribution and benefits as other full-time employees. u. Hall shall be eligible to receive One Thousand dollars ($1,000 per fiscal year for Tuition Reimbursement subject to the same terms and conditions as provided in the MEMA MOU. v. Hall shall not receive longevity pay.
w. Hall shall receive $15,000 for moving/relocation expenses.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 9, Packet Page 75 ATTACHMENT 2

8. Performance Evaluations:

The City Council shall review and evaluate the performance of Hall, with an outside consultant/facilitator, on at least an annual basis. The City Council shall define such goals and performance objectives that they determine to be necessary for the proper operation of the City.

9. Indemnification:

The City shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify Hall against any lawsuit pursuant and subject to the provisions and limitations of California Government Code § 825, provided such lawsuit is against Hall for acts or omissions within the course and scope of his employment. Hall agrees to cooperate in any and all litigation matters.

10. Notices:

Notices pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing given by deposit in the custody of the United States Postal Service, first class postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
a. The CITY: Mayor and City Council
City of Monterey
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
b. HALL: City of Monterey
580 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
Alternatively, notices required pursuant to this Agreement may be personally served in the same manner as is applicable to civil judicial process. Notice shall be deemed as given as of the date of personal service or as of the date of deposit of such written notice, postage prepaid, with the United States Postal Service.

11. Bonding:

The City shall bear the full cost of any crime insurance, fidelity or other bond required for the City Manager under any law or ordinance.

12. Professional Memberships, Meetings, Seminars:

It is understood and agreed that the City and Hall will mutually benefit from Hall’s participation in certain professional activities relating to City Managers and City administrations. Subject to budgetary constraints, Hall may enroll, attend, and participate in conferences, courses, seminars, committee work, or other activities of organizations that benefit the City.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 10, Packet Page 76 ATTACHMENT 2

13. Miscellaneous:
a. The text herein shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement may not be modified, except by written agreement executed by both parties. b. If any provision, or any portion thereof, contained in this Agreement is held unconstitutional, invalid, or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or portion thereof, shall be deemed severable, shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect.
c. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. d. The parties agree that any ambiguity in this Agreement shall not be construed or interpreted against, or in favor of, either party.
e. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts containing original signatures. f. This Agreement shall be interpreted as though it was prepared by both the City and Hall.

DATED: ____________________
__________________________
Dante G. Hall
DATED: _____________________
_________________________
Tyller Williamson, Mayor
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 13., Item Page 11, Packet Page 77 Council
Agenda Report
№12/25
FROM: Nat Rojanasathira, Assistant City Manager
Prepared By: Laurie Huelga, Communications Manager
SUBJECT: Authorize the City Manager or Designee to Execute an Agreement with the Monterey County Office of Education (MCOE) for an Amount Not to Exceed $120,668.40 for Production and Broadcast Services (Not a Project Under CEQA Article 20, Section 15378 and under General Rule Article 5, Section 15061) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council authorize the City Manager by
minute action to execute an agreement with the
Monterey County Office of Education (MCOE) for an
amount not to exceed $120,668.40 for Production and
Broadcast Services.

VALUE DRIVERS:

Foster a local government that is transparent and
collaborative; and solicits, welcomes and appreciates
input from all.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS:

Since 1998, the City of Monterey has contracted to
provide for Public, Educational, and Governmental
(PEG) Access programming of City Council, and Board
and Commission meetings to provide accessible,
transparent, city services, programs, policies and
initiatives to the residents of Monterey.

CAMPAIGN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT (LEVINE
ACT) APPLIES: No.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

In FY 2024-25, the City paid our current provider, Access Media Productions (AMP) $118,513.65 from Franchise Fees (received from both AT&T and Comcast), which is a type of General Fund revenue, and $137,719.45 from Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) Fees (received from both AT&T and Comcast), which is a special revenue source, for a total of $256,233.10. The fees are not considered an expenditure; rather, a percentage of the revenue collected is held in a liability account as a passthrough and then paid to AMP for their services.

The state controls the cable franchise agreements through the California Public Utilities Commission, and the current agreement is in effect through 2028.

Agenda Report Highlights
• The City of Monterey plans to award
a contract to MCAET, a division of
MCOE, for production and
broadcast services starting in spring
2026, offering significant cost
savings.
• MCAET's proposal is the most costeffective, saving the City $155,676 annually compared to the current
contract with AMP.
• MCAET has extensive experience,
technical expertise, and a strong
organizational structure, making it
the top-ranked proposer.
• The City of Salinas highly
recommends MCAET for its reliable
services, youth-driven approach,
and strong technical support.

Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 14.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 14., Item Page 1, Packet Page 78 №11/25
With the current contract for production and broadcast services due to expire April 20, 2026, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Production and Broadcast Services on October 17, 2025, with a deadline to receive proposals of December 1, 2025. The pricing model to be used in this contract going forward, regardless of what firm receives the award, is to pay a set amount and no longer transmit a percentage of Franchise or PEG Fees to the vendor.

The three top candidates submitted bids for providing the required services at annual costs of $100,557 (Media Center for Art, Education, and Technology (MCAET), a division of the Monterey County Office of Education), $151,200 (Pegasus Studios), and $180,000 (AMP), which, due to the new payment model, would provide cost savings to the City as follows:

MCAET Pegasus Studios AMP
Current contract’s cost to City: $256,233.10 $256,233.10 $256,233.10 Less bids received for new contract: -$100,557.00 -$151,200.00 -$180,000.00 Cost Savings to City: $155,676.10 $105,033.10 $ 76,233.10 The City Council identified changing access providers as a cost savings strategy to address the City’s $10 million structural deficit. Awarding the contract to MCOE would allow the City to retain the Franchise Fee revenue, approximately $119,000 annually, as General Fund revenue for services such as police, fire, and other core services. Of the $138,000 in estimated PEG Fee Revenues annually, $100,557 would go to MCOE’s MCAET for access services, and the remaining $37,443 could be used for incidental costs for MCAET broadcast services, such as broadcasting additional City events and town hall meetings, or for PEG equipment infrastructure needs such as those needed for the Council Chamber.

Staff recommends awarding a contract to the Monterey County Office of Education for a not-toexceed amount of $120,668.40 ($100,557 plus 20% contingency of $20,111.40).

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

The City of Monterey determined that the proposed action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)(CCR, Title 14, Chapter 3 (“CEQA Guidelines), Article 20, Section 15378). In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 includes the general rule that CEQA applies only to activities which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. Because the proposed action and this matter have no potential to cause any effect on the environment, or because it falls within a category of activities excluded as projects pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378, this matter is not a project. Because the matter does not cause a direct or any reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change on or in the environment, this matter is not a project. Any subsequent discretionary projects resulting from this action will be assessed for CEQA applicability.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:

The City Council could choose not to change Production and Broadcast Services vendors. The result would be continued higher costs, reduced quality and services for local government access programming.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 14., Item Page 2, Packet Page 79 №11/25
DISCUSSION:

Overview of Current Service Provider and Contract
Access Monterey Peninsula, Inc. (“AMP”), which began using the name Access Media Productions around 2017 to better reflect its purpose, is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) public access television station organization that manages public, educational and government access production, programming, and promotion in the Monterey Peninsula area. AMP was formed as the result of extensive public input that was part of the franchise renewal process undertaken by the City of Monterey between 1995 and 1998. Authority to provide these management services was initially granted by an Agreement in 1998 between AMP and the City of Monterey. Since then, AMP has signed a renewal agreement with Monterey, and similar agreements with the cities of Marina, Seaside, and Pacific Grove.

Under the 1998 agreement, the City of Monterey has contracted with AMP to provide for PEG Government Access programming on the Monterey Channel on cable TV channel 25. The Monterey Channel currently streams live and recorded meetings of City Council and Board and Commissions meetings, as well as town hall events and other special city programming. AMP produces nearly 130 meetings live and on-demand for the City of Monterey each year. Since 2020, AMP services also stream City programming live and on-demand on the City’s YouTube channel at https://youtube.com/cityofmonterey.

Proposals for New Contract
With the current contract due to expire on April 20, 2026, City staff published a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Production and Broadcast Services, with the goal, given the City’s fiduciary responsibility and current budget challenges, of determining whether these services could be provided more effectively and at a lower cost. The RFP was issued on October 17, 2025, with proposals due no later than December 1, 2025. The RFP received seven submissions, with one being disqualified for submitting late. The top three proposals, in order of ranking based on the below evaluation criteria, are from:

1. MCAET (a division of MCOE) with a score of 92,

2. Pegasus Studios with a score of 86, and

3. AMP with a score of 77.5.

The criteria used in evaluation, along with a summary of staff’s findings, are as follows:

1. Proposed Cost: The total cost for services, including the breakdown of annual and monthly fees – Weighted at 25%. Findings: Awarding the contract to MCOE would save the City $155,676 per year as compared with the current contract. Awarding to MCOE instead of AMP would save the City $79,443 per year.

2. Technical Approach: The proposed approach to meeting the technical quality and broadcast standards outlined in the scope of work – Weighted at 25%. Findings: MCAET is a division of the Monterey County Office of Education (MCOE) and has their full support and stable and established backing.

3. Experience and Qualifications: The vendor's experience and qualifications in providing similar services – Weighted at 20%. Findings: MCAET has over 16 years of experience providing broadcast, streaming, and media management services for municipal Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 14., Item Page 3, Packet Page 80 №11/25
agencies, including for the City of Salinas. MCAET has the technical expertise and staff readiness, with continual training of new and current staff on latest technology and best practices supported by MCOE. They have broad, high-end, production quality expertise with the work they do beyond PEG programming.

4. Management Team and Organizational Structure: The stability and experience of the management team and organizational structure – Weighted at 10%. Findings: Stability and experience of the management team and organizational structure is paramount in the ability to provide excellent services. Staff’s analysis determined that MCAET outmatches its competitors in this regard.

5. Compliance: The vendor's ability to comply with all state and federal regulations, and city standards – Weighted at 10%. Findings: The ability to understand the ever-changing state and federal mandates, as well as the best approach for implementing these standards, including through the use of artificial intelligence, is critical. In addition, complying with city standards is essential. Staff believes MCAET's understanding and incorporation of these rules is second nature, which would make the City's relationship with MCAET seamless.

6. Communication: The vendor's plan for communication and reporting to the City of Monterey – Weighted at 10%. Findings: Communication by both City staff and contractor staff is vital to producing professional production quality videos for our community.

Second-Highest Ranked Proposer: Pegasus Studios
The second-ranked proposer, Pegasus Studios, has an impressive work history working with many Southern California government agencies. They showed a strong passion and expertise in the in-person interview. They are very technically experienced as well and understand the PEG structure. Their annual cost was $50,000 more than MCAET’s, and some additional charges may be added for other services. They currently do not have the established staffing in the Monterey region that MCAET does.

Access Media Productions, Third-Ranked Proposer
The third-ranked proposer, AMP, has been a long-standing partner with the City of Monterey.

The City of Monterey is their largest partner in terms of financial support production volume, supporting 52% of their annual budget, compared to the City of Marina at 21%, and the cities of Seaside and Pacific Grove providing just 7% each.

Staff has been concerned about technical, staffing, administrative, and financial challenges within AMP over the past few years. As the public switches from cable to streaming services, PEG programming funding is impacted, which affects AMP’s revenue. Additionally, with large shifts in technology, the public needs for AMP services are reduced, since virtually anyone can use their phone video camera and editing software.

A 2023 Performance Review by the Buske Group was comprehensive, taking six months to complete. The report included findings on challenges relating to AMP’s facility, staffing, and operations. Key findings from the Buske Report are of concern to staff in terms of AMP’s ability to provide required services in the current contract, and their ability to provide sufficient quality service to the City in the future. Some of the concerns raised in the Buske Report include:

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 14., Item Page 4, Packet Page 81 №11/25
- AMP’s production studio and control room are very small in comparison to studios and control rooms in other Community Media Centers (CMCs) that serve similar-sized locations in the U.S. Public hours of operation at the AMP facility are much less than that of other CMCs in California. Except for several field production and editing equipment items (all of which are 10-25 years old), most of the items in the AMP inventory were purchased in the past five years. Some of the equipment purchased during the past five years is not considered state-of-the-art for use in the studio of a community media center.
- The Report stated, “Unlike the responses to our request for data regarding locallyproduced, first-run programming for our performance review of AMP for 2013-2015, no such data was available, since AMP staff no longer tracks this information. Locallyproduced, first-run programming is an important statistic to monitor on an ongoing basis.”
- The data reported above shows that AMP’s management decisions during the past five years have had a major impact on the ability of AMP to fulfill its mission – especially regarding non-governmental production activities and community participation.

AMP staff acknowledge they are working to address the need for improvements. The current AMP contract AG-7652 (Section 2C) states that AMP will operate a community media center available for public use of equipment and facilities and include training on the use of equipment.

The Buske Report determined those services have virtually “vanished”, especially post-COVID.

In addition, in Section 2L the contract states that AMP will “actively promote the use and benefit of the PEG access channels and facilities to cable subscribers, the public, PEG access users, and Franchises.” AMP currently has very limited social media outreach, with 29 posts and 342 followers on Instagram and 407 followers and 7 posts in two years on Facebook, with no interactions on any of those.

For most of 2025, AMP experienced an issue with their website that is still unresolved. They built a new site at accessmediaproduction.org intending on unpublishing the site at ampmedia.org, but they are having trouble redirecting the domain name. This affects their search analytics and overall online presence. In Section 2M, AMP is required to provide a performance review every three years. The Buske report resulting in the performance review was overdue and spurred by City staff’s request.

MCAET Recommended by the City of Salinas
The City of Salinas shared their high satisfaction with MCAET’s services. Salinas has used MCAET for decades. City of Salinas staff noted their appreciation of MCAET’s collaboration and succession planning. MCAET continually trains new students with a stable learning path that allows for job shadowing. Salinas staff appreciates that they are youth-driven and noted that some of their students become employees. They added that MCAET is easy to work with, and flexible. Finally, they added that MCAET’s tech support is excellent and as a division of the Monterey County Office of Education, MCOE is able to offer additional support if needed.

Recommendation
Taking all the above into consideration, and while City staff appreciates the long-standing relationship with AMP, staff recommend authorizing the City Manager by minute action to Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 14., Item Page 5, Packet Page 82 №11/25
execute a contract with MCOE for future Production and Broadcast Services that would begin in spring 2026.

NR/lh
e: AMP Executive Director
MCAET Executive Director
Writings distributed for discussion or consideration on this matter within 72 hours prior to the meeting, pursuant to Government Code § 54957.5, will be made available at the following link:
https://monterey.gov/Submitted-Comments
Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 14., Item Page 6, Packet Page 83 Date: 2/3/2026
Item No.: 16.

Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 1, Packet Page 84 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 2, Packet Page 85 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 3, Packet Page 86 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 4, Packet Page 87 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 5, Packet Page 88 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 6, Packet Page 89 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 7, Packet Page 90 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 8, Packet Page 91 Council Regular Meeting, 2/3/2026, Item No. 16., Item Page 9, Packet Page 92

Monterey City CouncilFebruary 3, 2026

Monterey City Council
February 3, 2026