Agenda packet — Monterey Park City Council, June 4, 2025 (part 1 of 2)

City Council of Monterey Park
The City Council Acting on Behalf of the Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency, the Housing Authority, the Monterey Park Financing Authority and the Monterey Park Geologic Hazard Abatement District Agenda

Regular Meeting
Monterey Park City Hall Council Chambers
320 West Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754

Wednesday, June 4, 2025
6:30 PM
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Land Acknowledgment
We would like to acknowledge that the land we inhabit today was once known as Tovangaar, the home of the Gabrieleño-Tongva people. We show our respect to the Gabrieleño-Tongva people, as well as all Indigenous people, past, present, and future, and honor their labor as original caretakers of this land. We commit to uplifting the Gabrieleño-Tongva people, invite you to acknowledge the history, and join us in caring for this land.

General Information
Documents related to an Agenda item are available to the public in the City Clerk’s Office located at 320 West Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754, during normal business hours and at www.montereypark.ca.gov/agendas.

The public may watch the meeting live on the city’s cable channel MPKTV (AT&T U-verse, channel 99 or Charter Communications, channel 182) or by visiting the city’s website at http://www.montereypark.ca.gov/133/City-Council-Meeting-Videos. Per the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please call City Hall at (626) 307-1359 for reasonable accommodation at least 24 hours before a meeting. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible.

Public Participation
You may speak up to 5 minutes on an/each Agenda item. You may combine up to 2 minutes of time with another person’s speaking. No person may speak more than a total of 10 minutes. The Mayor and City Council may change the amount of time allowed for speakers. Written Communication will be accepted up to 24 hours before the meeting by completing an online form at www.montereypark.ca.gov/writtencomm.

While all comments are welcome, the Brown Act does not allow the City Council to take action on any item not on the agenda. The Council may briefly respond to comments after Public Communications is

Page 1 of 282 ends

closed. Persons may, in addition to any other matter within the City Council's subject-matter jurisdiction, comment on Agenda Items at this time. If you provide public comment on a specific Agenda item at this time, however, you cannot later provide comments at the time the Agenda Item is considered.

1. Call to Order
Mayor

2. Flag Salute
The Monterey Park Fire Explorers

3. Roll Call
Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang

4. Agenda Additions, Deletions, Changes and Adoptions

5. Public Communications

6. Staff Communications

6.A. Fire Department

6.B. Library

6.C. Recreation and Community Services

7. Presentation

7.A. Terena Phan - Miss Los Angeles Chinatown 4th Princess

7.B. Recognition of Eagle Scout Project at Fire Station 61

8. Old Business

9. Consent Calendar
All items under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. Specific items may be removed from the Consent Calendar at the request of any member of the City Council for separate consideration.

9.A. Minutes

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the minutes from the special meetings of April 16, 2025 and April 21, 2025 and the regular meeting of April 16, 2025; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

9.B. Monthly Investment Report - April 2025

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

Page 2 of 282 ends

1. Receiving and filing the monthly investment report; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

9.C. Waive further reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Title 2 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) to dissolve the Design Review Board ("DRB").

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Waiving the second reading and adopting the proposed Ordinance; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

9.D. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to accept additional California Library Association Zip Book Grant funding and appropriate funding into 2024-25 Fiscal year budget

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to accept an additional $1,248 in California Library Association Zip Book grant funding to purchase books;

2. Authorizing the Finance Director to appropriate the $1,248 funding into the 2024-25 Fiscal Year budget; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

9.E. Receive and file a summary of The Windstorm and Firestorm Local Emergency

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing this staff report summarizing the status of windstorm and firestorm local emergency; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the extension under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and 15378 exempt activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, activities where there is possibility that it may have a significant effect on the environment, and activities that do not constitute a “project” as defined, respectively. This activity reflects administrative changes and policy making. Accordingly, this activity is exempt from further review.

9.F. Amendment to Agreement 1980-A with Sebastian Waterworks, Inc., DBA Mr. Rooter Plumbing of South San Gabriel

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

Page 3 of 282 ends

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Sixth Amendment with Sebastian Waterworks, Inc., DBA Mr. Rooter Plumbing of South San Gabriel, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for on-call commercial plumbing services at City- owned facilities in an amount not to exceed $205,000. The Amendment extends the term through June 30, 2026; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The proposed project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (Existing Facilities). The Project results in minor alterations to existing public facilities involving no significant expansion of the existing use.

The Project is not anticipated to have any significant impacts regarding noise, air quality, or water quality.

9.G. Receive and file the Cost Allocation Plan Study

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the Cost Allocation Plan study; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

9.H. Amendment to Agreement No. 2466-AB, and Task Order 2455-AA concerning the S.

Garfield and S. Atlantic Water Projects

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute the First Amendment, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to Agreement No. 2466-AB with J.A. Salazar, to increase the contract amount by $153,612; for a total of $3,736,402, plus $346,728 contingency; and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a revised Task Order 2455-AA1, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with SA Associates., for an additional $137,000 for a new not to exceed amount of $367,000 for construction management and construction inspection services; and

3. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The proposed project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (Existing Facilities). The Project results in minor alterations to existing public facilities involving no significant expansion of the existing use. The Project is not anticipated to have any significant impacts with regard to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality.

9.I. Amendment to agreement 2314-A with Corporate Coach Charters & Tours and increase the contract amount by $35,000 to provide recreation trips and event shuttle services in Fiscal Year 2025-26

Page 4 of 282 ends

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving an amendment to the agreement with Corporate Coach Charters & Tours to increase the contract amount by $35,000 to provide recreation trips and event shuttle services in Fiscal Year 2025-26; and

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

9.J. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Monterey Park Recognizing the Month of June 2025 as LGBTQ+ Pride Month (As Requested by Council Member Lo)

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting the attached Resolution: and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

9.K. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Monterey Park Declaring June 6, 2025, National Gun Violence Awareness Day and June 7-8, 2025, as Wear Orange Weekend in Monterey Park (As Requested by Council Member Sanchez)

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting the attached Resolution: and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10. Public Hearing

10.A. Continued public hearing to consider introduction and first reading of an Ordinance amending the Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) to implement the General Plan regulating mixed use development and development standards (ZCA 25-02)

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing and taking testimonial and documentary evidence;

2. After closing the public hearing and considering the evidence submitted during that public hearing, introducing and waiving first reading of Ordinance No. _____ amending the Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) to implement the General Plan regulating mixed use development and development standards; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Page 5 of 282 ends

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed Ordinance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15062, the City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to further review under CEQA because the previous CEQA documents adopted by the City Council (see Resolution Nos. 12124 and 2022-R2) adequately analyze the changes contemplated by this Ordinance.

Type of Action (Legislative; Quasi-Judicial; or Advisory):

In considering the Zoning Code Amendment, the City Council acts in its discretionary legislative capacity. The City Council must make the following findings pursuant to MPMC §

21.38.050:
• That the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan;
• That the proposed amendment will not adversely affect surrounding properties; and • That the proposed amendment promotes public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of the Zoning Code.

These findings are included in the attached Ordinance.

10.B. Public Hearing and Approval of the FY2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, and FY2025-2026 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships Programs

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Conduct a public hearing and receive public comments and testimony on the FY 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan (“CP”), and FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan (“AAP”);

2. Approve and authorize the submittal of the FY 2025-2029 CP, and FY 2025-2026 AAP, including Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) and HOME Investment Partnerships (“HOME”) funding recommendations;

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute all appropriate and necessary documents to receive funding and implement approved use and make necessary budget adjustments based on HUD's final allocation amount;

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute sub-recipient agreements with the non-profit organizations receiving CDBG and HOME allocations in the AAP; and

5. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

11. New Business

11.A. Adoption of an Ordinance Updating the Fire Hazard Severity Zones ("FHSZ") Pursuant to Government Code section 51178

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Introducing and waiving the first reading of an ordinance adopting the Office of the State Fire Marshal ("OFSM") finalized State Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone ("FHSZ") map;

2. Setting the second reading and Public Hearing for June 18, 2025; and

Page 6 of 282 ends

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

12. City Communications (City Council)

13. Future Agenda Items

14. Closed Session (if Required; City Attorney to Announce)

15. Adjourn

Page 7 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.A.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Maychelle Yee , City Clerk
Cindy Trang, Deputy City Clerk
Subject: Minutes

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the minutes from the special meetings of April 16, 2025 and April 21, 2025 and the regular meeting of April 16, 2025; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The minutes are a record of the official actions taken at the City Council meeting.

Background:

It is recommended that the City Council consider approving the minutes from the special meetings of April 16, 2025 and April 21, 2025 and the regular meeting of April 16, 2025.

Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A

Fiscal Impact:

N/A

Attachments:

1. Draft Minutes

Page 8 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4, 2025
ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Minutes

Page 9 of 282 ends

xx-xx

MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

MINUTES

MONTEREY PARK CITY COUNCIL

FINANCING AUTHORITY (MPFA)

HOUSING AUTHORITY (MPHA)

GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT (GHAD)

SUCCESSOR AGENCY (SA)

SPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 16, 2025

The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Special Meeting of the Council in Room 266, Second Floor of City Hall located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Wednesday, April 16, 2025, at 5:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Ngo called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

City Manager Inez Alvarez called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo arrived at 5:37 p.m. , Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None.

ALSO PRESENT : City Attorney Karl Berger, Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia , Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Christine Tomikawa , Director of Public Works Shawn Igoe, Director of Finance Martha Garcia

VIRTUALLY PRESENT: Assistant City Attorney Tim Campen

AGENDA ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, CHANGES AND ADOPTIONS:

City Attorney Berger announced the consideration of an addition of an item to the agenda.

City Attorney Berger reported the following:

“It is recommended that the City Council, upon 2/3 vote (four council members), amend the agenda to add an item to tonight’s agenda. Government Code § 54954.2 allows items to be added to the agenda if the City Council finds that the matter arose after posting of the agenda and requires a decision before the next regular meeting.”

Page 10 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
The reason for amending the agenda is that at approximately 2:11 p.m., the City Manager was informed that TRC may have breached its Development Agreement with the City (see Ordinance No. 2251). Specifically, TRC is obligated under Section 4.2.3 of the Development Agreement to bring forward – not later than April 20, 2025 - multiple documents for City Council consideration and potential approval. Based upon an email sent by TRC’s representatives dated April 16, 2025 and time stamped 11:52 a.m., it does not appear TRC will meet that deadline. There are no further regular Council meetings scheduled for April.

Accordingly, the agenda is amended to add a new closed session item noted as Agenda Item No. 2D captioned:

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATION OF LITIGATION - GOVERNMENT CODE § 54956.9(d)(4) Number of Cases: One. A copy of the April 16, 2025 email is on file with the City Clerk (not required by applicable law; voluntarily disclosed).”

Action Taken: The City Council upon 2/3 vote (4 members present), add ed the proposed item to the agenda as Agenda Item No. 2D pursuant to Government Code § 54954.2.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None.

Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS: None.

[1.] OPEN SESSION

1-A. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTRACT

WITHOUT THE NEED FOR BIDDING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE § 22050 TO ABATE PUBLIC NUISANCES AT 795 WEST GARVEY

Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider:

(1) Adopting a Resolution declaring an emergency and authorizing contracting without formal bidding pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050;

Page 11 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
(2) Authorizing the City Manager to execute a standard public works contract, in a form approved with the City Attorney, in accordance with the draft Resolution and select a contractor to abate public nuisance conditions at real property located at 795 West Garvey Avenue (the “Property”);

(3) Authorizing the City Attorney to take all legal actions required to ensure payment of all costs associated with the City’s abatement by the Property owner pursuant to MPMC Chapter 4.30 or as may otherwise be ordered by the Court; and

(4) Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

In 2017, the City issued a construction permit to build a commercial retail structure and related improvements for the Property. Construction is estimated to be approximately 80% complete, but has stagnated since at least 2021 with no discernable progress since. This left the property in a state of unfinished construction and blight; the City issued more than $20,000 in unpaid administrative fines primarily for illicit stormwater runoff from the Property resulting from the Property’s state of unfinished construction. Despite the City’s efforts to obtain voluntary compliance, construction activity still has not commenced. Adopting the draft Resolution will facilitate the City’s ability to abate the property.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City Council’s actions are exempt from additional CEQA review as they are being made to protect public and private property and necessary to maintain services essential to the public, health and welfare (see Ca/Beach Advocates v.

City of Solana Beach (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 529: CEQA findings regarding an anticipated imminent emergency are valid)

Action Taken: By Consensus, the City Council carried this item over to the April 16, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting at 6:30 p.m.

1-B. APPOINTMENT OF REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS

Action Taken: The City Council appointed the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Director of Finance, and City Attorney as the real property negotiators for Closed Session Item No. 2-B.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Sanchez and seconded by Council Member Wong, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Page 12 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
[2.] CLOSED SESSION
The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 5:37 p.m.

2-A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION - GOVERNMENT CODE § 54956.9(d)(1)

City of Monterey Park v. Edward Chan, et al., (filed March 7, 2024) LASC Case No. 24NNCV00087

2-B. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS - GOVERNMENT CODE § 54956.8: 1 item (HA)

Property: 580 Monterey Pass Rd, APN 5261-001-052
582 Monterey Pass Rd, APN 5261-001-053
City Negotiators: Inez Alvarez, City Manager
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
Diana Garcia, Assistant City Manager
Martha Garcia, Director of Finance
Negotiating
Parties:
3M Property Investment Co.

Under
Negotiation:

Lease terms, purchase price, and terms of payment

2-C. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS, PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE § 54957.6

City
Negotiators:

City Attorney, City Manager, Deputy City Attorney Zachary A.

Lopes and Director Christine Tomikawa
Employee
Organizations:

Confidential Employees' Association, Firefighters' Association, Mid-Management Association, Police Captains' Association, Police Officers' Association, Police Officers' Mid- Management Association, Professional Chief Officers' Association, and Service Employees International Union, Local 721

2-D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATION OF LITIGATION - GOVERNMENT CODE § 54956.9(d)(4)

Number of Cases: One. A copy of the April 16, 2025 email is on file with the City Clerk (not required by applicable law; voluntarily disclosed).

Page 13 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025

RECESSED AND RECONVENED
The City Council recessed at 6:37 p.m. The City Council reconvened into Closed Session at 9:42 p.m.

RECONVENED & ADJOURNMENT
The City Council reconvened and adjourned from Closed Session with all Council Members present at 10:55 p.m.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 10 :55 p.m.

Action Taken: No reportable action taken in Closed Session.

Maychelle Yee
City Clerk

Approved on MM DD, 2025, at the Regular City Council Meeting

Page 14 of 282 ends

xx-xx

MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.
.

MINUTES

MONTEREY PARK CITY COUNCIL

FINANCING AUTHORITY (MPFA)

HOUSING AUTHORITY (MPHA)

GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT (GHAD)

SUCCESSOR AGENCY (SA)

REGULAR MEETING
APRIL 16, 2025

The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Regular Meeting of the Council in the Council Chamber, located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Par k, Wednesday, April 16, 2025 at 6:30 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Ngo called the meeting to order at 6:49 p.m.

FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Ngo led the flag salute. Pledge of Allegiance presented by Civic Superstar Hailey Nam.

ROLL CALL:

City Clerk Maychelle Yee called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None.

ALSO PRESENT: City Treasurer Amy Lee, City Manager Inez Alvarez, City Attorney Karl Berger, Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia, Interim Fire Chief Scott Haberle, Police Chief Scott Wiese, Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Christine Tomikawa, Interim Director of Community Development Phillip Lanzafame , Director of Finance Martha Garcia, City Librarian Kristin Olivarez, Director of Public Works Shawn Igoe, Director of Recreation and Community Services Robert Aguirre, Police Captain Gus Jimenez, IT Manager Martin Dinh, Planning Manager Beth Chow, Engineering Manager/ Transtech Consultant Ziad Mazboudi, Senior Librarian Leonie Jordan, Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang, Office Assistant II Michelle Martinez

VIRTUALLY PRESENT: Assistant City Attorney Tim Campen

Page 15 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
AGENDA ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, CHANGES AND ADOPTIONS:

City Manager Alvarez requested to move Agenda Item Nos. 1A and 3S to be heard before Public Communications. City Attorney Berger reported the addition of Agenda Item No. 1A from the April 16, 2025 special meeting to Consent Calendar as Agenda Item No. 3T.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS:

Public Communications was heard after Agenda Item No. 3S.

- Rick Eng from the Organization of Chinese Americans ( OCA) – Asian Pacific American Advocates of Greater Los Angeles thanked the City for their support at the Community Clean -up and the Intergenerational Mahjong Game at the Langley Center. He presented certificates of appreciation to the City Council, Recreation and Community Services Director Aguirre and City Treasurer Lee .

Mr. Eng announced a program honoring generational heroes at NBC Seafood where they will honor Council Member Lo with the Generational H ero Award on May 18, 2025.

- Lauren Hill, Public Information Officer from the United States Small Business Administration provided information on ways to receive disaster response resources for individuals impacted economically.

- Mike Greenspan spoke on Agenda Item No. 2C , Conference with Labor Negotiators, Pursuant to California Government Code § 54957.6 from the April 16, 2025, special City Council meeting and expressed his opinion on neighboring cities in debt.

- Miss LGBT Voice talked about her experience attending different council meetings and suggested providing refreshments to encourage participation. She conveyed her frustrations on the tariff implementation, suggested a tax -relief program for the residents, spoke about the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority and recommended a free meal program for the residents.

- Christine Wong voiced her opinion on the Barnes Park pool, claiming it boosts the local economy, community health and safety and supports the students in the Mark Keppel Aquatics Program.

- Robert Ogawa- Monroe spoke about the need for a competition -sized pool, claiming the City needs more than one pool to support the programs and needs of the residents of the City and students at Mark Keppel High.

- Tracy Tsy talked about the need to save the Barnes Park pool, emphasizing the benefits it provides to the residents and students at Mark Keppel High.

Page 16 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
- Maychelle Yee, speaking as a resident, read a prepared letter on behalf of Alisa Van-Truong. Alisa wrote about her experience in Monterey Park and the benefits the Barnes Park pool has brought to her community. Maychelle, added to Alisa’s letter, reiterating the importance of honesty and transparency to the residents in Monterey Park.

- Damien Joa voiced his opinion about the maintenance of the Barnes Park pool and proposed the opportunity to create a multifunctional facility for the residents.

- David Wilson, read a prepared statement from Chris Luu. Chris wrote about his time as a resident of Monterey Park, emphasizing his involvement with the Barnes Park pool. He wrote that having a pool promotes economic growth and provides an inclusive space for the residents. David, adding to Chris’s statement, emphasized the benefits a well- maintained pool can provide for children in the city.

- Margaret Leung conveyed her opinion about the legacy of the Barnes Park pool.

She suggested the opportunity to research an estimate to repair the pool, along with a conversation between the City Council and the residents regarding the matter.

- Paul Isozaki was given ten minutes as Debbie Yamamoto and Mindy Romo yielded their time to him. Paul stated his opinion about the city, placing and emphasis on the Langley Center and spoke about areas of improvement in the City. He talked about the Barnes Park pool and its potential benefits to help raise the community.

- Cindy Yee was given ten minutes as Arlene Rodriguez and Shirley Wong yielded their time to her. Cindy emphasized the positives and negatives of the City. She claimed the Barnes Park pool is a gem in the City and is worth the investment as it can provide a future legacy to the residents in the City.

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS:

- Library: Senior Librarian Jordan presented a PowerPoint presentation providing upcoming events occurring in the library which include: the Play Days Read and Ride Program; National Cat Lady Day; a 3D Printing Workshop; and the Free Hate Crime Safety Workshop.

- Police: Police Chief Wiese spoke about the upcoming Town Hall Meeting at Bella Vista Elementary School and the newly revamped 2025 Citizens Academy.

Page 17 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
- Recreation and Community Services: Recreation and Community Services Director Aguirre shared a PowerPoint Presentation expressing his appreciation to the people who attended the Cherry Blossom Festival and spoke about upcoming events which include the Rock and Roll Dance at the Langley Center and the Cinco de Mayo Celebration. He announced the newly renovated Barnes Park Gymnasium and elaborated on the City’s upcoming 109 th Birthday
Celebration at Barnes Park and the Memorial Day Ceremony at the American Legion.

1. PRESENTATION:

The matters listed under presentation are informational content and for discussion only.

1-A. EDISON SCHOLAR MATTHEW WONG

This Item was heard after Agenda, Additions Deletions, Changes and Adoptions.

Government Relations Manager Marissa Castro Salvati depicted details about the Edison Scholar Program and presented one of the awarded recipients, Matthew Wong, resident of Monterey Park to the City Council.

Matthew expressed words of appreciation and shared his passion for Geophysics and his goal to provide modified building plans and retrofits that better accommodate the structures in Monterey Park.

2. OLD BUSINESS:

2-A. APPROVE THE ARTWORK SUBMITTED BY ARTIST VICTOR VING FOR THE

GREETINGS TOUR MURAL PROJECT TO BE PLACED ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 153 E. GARVEY AVENUE.

On September 18, 2024, the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Greetings Tour and artist Victor Ving for a community mural project.

On October 22, 2024, the Community Participation Commission voted to unanimously recommend installing the Greetings Tour Mural on the east -facing wall of the property at 153 E. Garvey Avenue. Following the City Council’s direction from the February 5, 2025, meeting, City staff has executed a Façade Easement Agreement with the property owners of 153 E. Garvey Avenue.

Page 18 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
From February 17 through March 17, 2025, the City and Artist Victor Ving provided community engagement for the Greetings Tour mural project. During this period, the community had the opportunity to vote on a variety of items relevant to the city, including landmarks, history, culture, and nature, as well as submit their own suggestions. Based on the most selected items, including the Cascades Waterfall, Lunar New Year, Cinco de Mayo, Tongva Tribe, Cherry Blossom, and Garvey Ranch Park Observatory, Victor Ving developed an artwork proof for the City Council’s consideration.

If the artwork (Attachment 1 to the staff report) is approved, the Artist, Victor Ving, will install the “Greetings from Monterey Park” mural during the month of May 2025.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the activity pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelin es”). The activity contemplates installing a mural on an existing building which does not involve any physical expansion of the building or installation of new structures. Accordingly, this activity is exempt from further review.

Discussion: Director of Recreation and Community Services Aguirre provided a PowerPoint presentation of the proposed artwork, developed by Artist Victor Ving in collaboration with Artists Jaime “Vyal” Reyes and River Garza for the Greetings Tour Mural project.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the artwork submitted by Artist Victor Ving for the Greetings Tour Mural Project.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Page 19 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025

3. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS NOS. 3A-3T
All items under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. Specific items may be removed from the Consent Calendar at the request of any member of the City Council for separate consideration.

Action Taken: Mayor Ngo reported a potential conflict of interest on Agenda Item No. 3P as his property is within 500 feet of the proposed project and did not participate in the item. Mayor Pro Tem Yang reported a potential conflict of interest on Agenda Item Nos. 3E, 3P, and 3Q as her business entity is within 500 feet of the proposed projects and did not participate on the items. The City Council approved and adopted Agenda Item Nos. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E and 3F, 3G, 3H, 3I, 3J, 3K, 3L, 3M, 3O, 3P, 3Q, 3R, and 3T on Consent Calendar, excluding Agenda Item Nos. 3N and 3S which were pulled for discussion, separate motion, reading resolutions and ordinances by the title only and waiving further reading thereof, as amended to correct a typo on Mayor Ngo’s name on Agenda Item No. 3K.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: Yang, for Agenda Item Nos. 3E, 3P, and 3Q, Ngo for Agenda Item No. 3P

3-A. MINUTES

It is recommended that the City Council consider a pproving the minutes from the regular meetings of February 5, 2025, and February 19, 2025, and March 5, 2025, and the special meetings of February 19, 2025, February 22, 2025, and March 12, 2025.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the minutes from the regular meetings of February 5, 2025, and February 19, 2025, and March 5, 2025, and the special meetings of February 19, 2025, February 22, 2025, and March 12, 2025, on Consent Calendar.

3-B. MONTHLY INVESTMENT REPORT – MARCH 2025

As of March 31, 2025, invested funds for the City of Monterey Park total $91,894,161.22.

Action Taken: The City Council received and filed the monthly investment report, on Consent Calendar.

Page 20 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-C. NOMINATION OF COUNCILMEMBER JOSE SANCHEZ TO THE METRO SAN

GABRIEL VALLEY SERVICE COUNCIL

The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) has requested that the cities of Monterey Park, Montebello, and Rosemead submit a nomination for a representative to serve on the Metro San Gabriel Valley Service Council. The current appointee, Montebello Councilmember Salvador Melendez, has indicated that he will conclude his term on June 30, 2025.

Councilmember Jose Sanchez has expressed interest in serving in this role to represent the City’s interests in public transit planning and service improvements and the cities of Montebello and Rosemead approve of his nomination. If approved, the City will submit a nomination letter to Metro by the May 9, 2025, deadline.

Metro’s Board of Directors will review nominations and make appointments at their June 26, 2025, meeting.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the nomination of Councilmember Jose Sanchez to the Metro San Gabriel Valley Service Council for the term beginning July 1, 2025, and ending June 30, 2028 and authorized the Mayor to sign a letter submitting this nomination to Metro, on Consent Calendar.

3-D. ADOPTING A RESOLUTION UPDATING THE CITY’S REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH AB1234, TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL PRE-

APPROVED CONFERENCES FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS

On February 5, 2014, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11629, which updated the City’s AB1234 policies for reimbursement of authorized expenses from 2011. Per Council request, the list of pre- approved events that the Council may participate in has been updated to include the Asian American Pacific Islanders Leadership Elected and Appointed (“AAPI LEAD”) Conference and the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (“NALEO”) Conference.

Action Taken: The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-R23 updating the City’s reimbursement policies in accordance with AB1234, to include additional pre-approved conferences for Elected Officials, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2025-R23
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY’S REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE §§ 53232.2 AND 53232.3

Page 21 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-E. WAIVE FURTHER READING AND ADOPT ZONING CODE AMENDMENT (ZCA- 25-01) AND ZONE CHANGE (ZA- 25-01), AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING THE MONTEREY PARK GENERAL PLAN BY AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE (“MPMC”) GOVERNING ACCESSORY

DWELLING UNITS, REPLACEMENT HOUSING, AND ADMINISTRATIVE USE

PERMITS, AND AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY ESTABLISHING THE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE ZONE.

The City’s 6th cycle (2021- 2029) Housing Element (“HE”) and Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element (“LUE”) establish a vision and long- term goals for development, housing, and redevelopment within the City. The attached Ordinance implements the LUE and HE by: (1) requiring replacement housing for development projects that displace existing units; (2) resolving inconsistencies in the administrative use permit approval requirements for alcohol related uses; (3) aligning the MPMC with volatile State accessory dwelling unit laws; and (4) establishing the residential incentive zone allowing certain housing developments without any discretionary approvals.

The Ordinance was introduced and received first reading at the March 19, 2025 City Council meeting. Second reading and adoption of this Ordinance is recommended. If adopted, the ordinance will take effect in 30 days.

Action Taken: Mayor Pro Tem Yang declared a potential conflict of interest on Agenda Item No. 3E as her business entity is within 500 feet of the proposed project, and did not participate on the item. The City Council waived the second reading and adopted Ordinance No. 2261, on Consent Calendar.

Ordinance No. 2261

AN ORDINANCE IMPLEMENTING THE MONTEREY PARK GENERAL PLAN BY AMENDING TITLE 21 OF THE MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE (“MPMC”)

CONCERNING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, REPLACEMENT HOUSING, AND ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMITS (ZCA- 25-01), AND AMENDING THE

ZONING MAP BY ESTABLISHING THE RESIDENTIAL INCENTIVE ZONE (ZA - 25-01)

Page 22 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-F. ACCEPTANCE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2537 -2543 LEE AVE., S.

EL MONTE, CA, AS PARTIAL SATISFACTION OF DEBT OWED TO CITY, AND

PAYMENT OF RELATED FEES

The City expended nearly $16 million to stabilize an unstable hillside on CII’s property located at to 1688 W. Garvey that presented an imminent threat to public safety, after CII failed to abate this public nuisance pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties. As part of that settlement agreement, CII put up commercial property located at 2537-2543 Lee Ave., S. El Monte, CA 91733 (APN 5281012011, 5281012012) (the “Property”) as a performance deed of trust to compensate the City in the event it had to directly abate the Property. Upon CII’s failure to reimburse the City for the cost of abatement, the City initiated sale of the Property by a trustee foreclosure auction. Because the Property did not sell at the auction, title to the Property is transferred to the City.

S.B.S. Trust Deed Network served as the City’s agent handling all aspects of foreclosure on the Property. Its fees and costs, totaling $83,231.78 (approximately

3.5% of the appraised value of the Property), must be paid for title of the Property to be transferred to the City.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed Ordinance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). This activity is exempt from the CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15601(b)(3) as it contemplates only administrative actions related to the acquisition of real property and it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that it may have a significant effect on the environment.

Action Taken: The City Council authorized the City Manager to accept, on behalf of the City, fee simple title to real property commonly known as 2537- 2543 Lee Ave., S. El Monte, CA 91733 (APN 5281012011, 5281012012), as partial satisfaction of debt owed by Center Int’l Investments, LLC (“CII”), r elated to the City’s abatement of CII’s property located at 1688 W. Garvey Ave. and adopted Resolution No. 2025-R24 authorizing payment of $83,231.78 in trustee sales agent fees to take title of real property located at 2537- 2543 Lee Ave., S. El Monte, CA 91733, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2025-R24
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF $83,231.78 TO ACQUIRE TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2537- 2543 LEE AVE., S. EL MONTE, CA 91733 AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER, OR

DESIGNEE, TO TAKE ALL ACTIONS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE

TRANSFER OF TITLE

Page 23 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-G. PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERKS WEEK RESOLUTION

The Office of the City Clerk is celebrating the week of May 4 – May 10, 2025 as Professional Municipal Clerks Week. This week, sponsored by the International Institute of Municipal Clerk’s (IIMC) and celebrated annually, honors and recognizes the Municipal Clerk profession as a vital part of local government celebrated throughout the world including the United States, Canada and 15 other countries. We are enlisting your support in the form of a resolution to honor Professional Municipal Clerks for providing supports to the Council, departmental staff, other agencies, and residents of Monterey Park.

Public Speaker:

- City Clerk Yee speaking as the City Clerk, spoke about Agenda Item 3G. She provided information and history about Municipal Clerk’s week in honor of the Municipal Clerk Position. She emphasized the vital importance Clerks provide to City Government and expressed her appreciation for the City Clerk’s Office.

Action Taken: The City Council a dopted Resolution No. 2025-R25 declaring the week of May 4 – May 10, 2025 as Professional Municipal Clerks Week in Monterey Park, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2025-R25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK DECLARING MAY 4 THROUGH MAY 10, 2025 AS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL

CLERKS WEEK IN MONTEREY PARK

3-H. NATIONAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WEEK RESOLUTION

The Monterey Park Police Department is celebrating the week of May 4-10, 2025, as National Correctional Officers Week. In 1984, President Ronald Regan announced the first week in May as National Correctional Officers Week, and it has been celebrated annually ever since. It honors the thousands of men and women responsible for managing those brought into custody by law enforcement and awaiting trial. These individuals face difficult and often dangerous work environments and play a vital role in the criminal justice system. We are enlisting your support in the form of a resolution to honor these men and women in our area for their work every day to protect the residents of Monterey Park.

Action Taken: The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-R26 Declaring the week of May 4- 10, 2025, to be National Correctional Officers Week in the City of Monterey Park, on Consent Calendar.

Page 24 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
Resolution No. 2025-R26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK DECLARING MAY 4-10, 2025, NATIONAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS WEEK

IN MONTEREY PARK

3-I. NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS WEEK RESOLUTION

Every April, The Office for Victims of Crime leads communities throughout the country in their annual observances of National Crime Victims’ Rights Week. This year National Crime Victims’ Rights week is observed between April 6th – April 12th. We are enlisting Council’s support in the form of a resolution to honor all victims of crime.

Action Taken: The City Council a dopted Resolution No. 2025-R27 declaring the week of April 6th – 12th, 2025 as National Crime Victims’ Rights Week in the City of Monterey Park, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2025-R27

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK DECLARING APRIL 6-12, 2025, NATIONAL CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS WEEK IN

MONTEREY PARK

3-J A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING WEDNESDAY, APRIL 30, 2025, TO BE “DENIM DAY MONTEREY PARK”.

“Denim Day” was established by Peace Over Violence in honor of Sexual Violence Awareness Month. “Denim Day” has become a day of solidarity and a symbol of protest against erroneous and destructive attitudes about sexual assault.

Action Taken: The City Council a dopted R esolution No. 2025 -R28 declaring Wednesday, April 30, 2025, as “Denim Day Monterey Park”, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2025-R28
A RESOLUTION DECLARING APRIL 30, 2025, TO BE “DENIM DAY MONTEREY PARK,” SUPPORTING SEXUAL ABUSE AWARENESS AND THE BELIEF THAT

THERE IS NO EXCUSE AND NEVER AN INVITATION TO RAPE

Page 25 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-K. RECEIVE AND FILE A SUMMARY OF THE WINDSTORM AND FIRESTORM

LOCAL EMERGENCY

On January 21, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-R3 declaring a local emergency due to windstorm and firestorm events beginning on January 7, 2025, as reflected in the Governor’s Executive Order dated January 12, 2025. At its January 21, 2025, meeting, the City Council authorized the City Manager to take necessary measures to protect public health, safety, and general welfare including urgency abatement and direct negotiation of contracts pursuant to Public Contract Code §§ 20168 and 22050 for the completion of capital improvement plan (“CIP”) projects.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the extension under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). CEQA Guidelines §§ 15060(c)(2), 15061(b)(3), and 15378 exempt activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, activities where there is possibility that it may have a significant effect on the environm ent, and activities that do not constitute a “project” as defined, respectively. This activity reflects administrative changes and policy making. Accordingly, this activity is exempt from further review.

Action Taken: The City Council r eceived and filed this staff report summarizing the status of windstorm and firestorm local emergency and adopted a resolution to add projects to the Fiscal Year 2024- 25 Capital Improvement Program , as amended to correct a typo of Mayor Ngo’s name on the r esolution, on Consent Calendar.

3-L. BRUGGEMEYER LIBRARY GENERATOR INSTALLATION – AWARD OF

CONTRACT

Capital Improvement Project (“CIP”) No. 95038 – Bruggemeyer Library Generator Installation project includes the installation of a new Generac Generator and all related conduits at the Bruggemeyer Library (the “Project”). Their price is competitive and lower than other received bids for the Project. It is recommended that City Council waive the bidding requirements pursuant to Resolution No. 2025- R3 declaring a local emergency, and authorize the City Manager to execute a Public Works contract with Pacific P ower Engineering Technology, Inc. in the amount of $281,300 for the Bruggemeyer Library Generator Installation project and authorize the Director to approve change orders not to exceed $28,130 over the total contract amount.

Page 26 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed Ordinance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). The proposed activity contemplates maintenance, repair, and operation of Bruggemeyer Library by replacing mechanical equipment which involves no expansion of the existing use.

Action Taken: The City Council authorized the City Manager to execute a public works contract, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with Pacific Power Engineering Technology, Inc., in the amount of $281,300 for the Bruggemeyer Library Generator Installation Project and authorized the Director of Public Works to approve change orders and contingency up to $28,130 (10%) of the contract amount, for a total project cost of $309,430, on Consent Calendar.

3-M. APPROVAL OF FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.

West Coast Arborists, Inc. provides the City with tree maintenance and management services at various City locations. Staff recommends an amendment to the current contract with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for an additional $230,000, for a new annual amount of $670,000, to support the City’s increase in tree maintenance and management needs and expand West Coast Arborists services to include removal and planting of trees for sidewalk improvements and Capital Improvement Projects involving sidewalk repairs.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Action Taken: The City Council a uthorized the City Manager to execute a Fifth Amendment to Agreement 1284- A with West Coast Arborists, Inc., in a form approved by the City Attorney, to increase the contract’s annual amount to $670,000, on Consent Calendar.

Page 27 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-N. CITYWIDE SOLAR PANELS, BATTERY STORAGE AND EV CHARGING

STATIONS STRATEGY

The City’s FY 2024- 25 Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) includes Solar Panels, Battery Storage Systems and EV Charging Stations Project as Project No. 95052.

The Director has been evaluating the feasibility of installing solar panels, battery storage systems, and EV charging stations at various City facilities as part of the City’s Sustainability Plan and to help meet greenhouse gas reduction goals.

Through this assessment, the Director identified multiple locations where such installations could be both vi able and financially sustainable. Additionally, the Director has engaged in discussions with the owners of the existing solar panels at the Bruggemeyer Library and the Langley Senior Center regarding a potential buyout to reduce costs.

At this time, the Director seeks approval from the City Council on proceeding with negotiations with the relevant parties. Upon further progress, the Director will return with a comprehensive implementation plan for Council review and approval.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed action pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). The proposed activity contemplates installation, maintenance, repair, and operation of solar panels, battery storage systems and EV charging stations at various facilities. The recommended action is not a project and therefore does not require environmental review at this time.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the proposed strategy for the development of citywide solar panel installation, battery storage systems and electric vehicles (EV) charging stations at various facilities and a uthorized the Director of Public Works (“Director”) to negotiate a Project Development Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with a consultant.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Page 28 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-O. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 2466 -AA WITH NICHOLS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, CHTD. DBA NCE FOR SIDEWALK ASSESSMENT SERVICES

AND AWARD OF CONTRACT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PRECISION
CONCRETE, INC. DBA PRECISION CONCRETE CUTTING FOR

PROFESSIONAL CONCRETE CUTTING SERVICES

The Public Works Department is responsible for the maintenance of the City’s 238 miles of sidewalk for safe pedestrian access. The recommended actions will assist in the removal of potential tripping hazards at various locations throughout the City.

To better understand and plan sidewalk maintenance needs, the Director of Public Works (“Director”) proposes amending Agreement No. 2466- AA with Nichols Consulting Engineers, CHTD. dba NCE (“NCE”), in an amount not to exceed $53,900, for the preparation of a City-wide sidewalk assessment and maintenance program, which will identify areas with damaged or lifted sidewalks for timely repair and/or replacement.

Additionally, the Director recommends that City Council waive the bidding requirements pursuant to Resolution No. 2025- R3 and award a contract to Southern California Precision Concrete Inc. dba Precision Concrete Cutting (“Precision”) for concrete cutting services for minor deficiencies (lifts from one- quarter inch to two inches).

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed Ordinance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). The proposed action contemplates entering into agreements for assessment of the public right of way, and minor alterations to existing improvements. Accordingly, this activity is exempt from further review.

Action Taken: The City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an Amendment to Agreement No. 2466-AA with Nichols Consulting Engineers, CHTD. dba NCE, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for sidewalk assessment services for $53,900 and authorized the City Manager to execute an Agreement with Southern California Precision Concrete, Inc. dba Precision Concrete Cutting, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for professional concrete cutting services for a term of one year with the option to renew for two additional years with an annual amount not to exceed $150,000, on Consent Calendar.

Page 29 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
3-P. AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT TO MARK THOMAS FOR THE PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEER’S ESTIMATES (“PS&E”) FOR GARVEY CAPACITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT

The City was awarded funding through the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“LACMTA”) Project ID# MR2.1.1.21 and FTIP #LA9918883. The City released a Request for Proposals (“RFP”) and received four proposals for the preparation of PS&E for Monterey Pass Road Complete Street Project. Following an extensive selection process that included interviews of four firms, the Public Works Director (“Director”) selected Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. as the most qualified consultant for this work. The Garvey Capacity Improvements Project necessitates qualifications closely aligned with those required for the Monterey Pass Complete Street Project. To facilitate the timely completion of the Garvey Capacity Improvements Project’s design, the Director has determined that Mark Thomas is the most suitable candidate for the City’s award. The Director requested a proposal from Mark Thomas for the proposed work on Garvey Avenue, and a cost proposal was negotiated. The Director requests City Council approval to enter into an agreement with Mark Thomas in an amount not to exceed $1,348,896, for the preparation of PS&E for Garvey Capacity Improvements Project (the “Contract”).

Action Taken: Mayor Ngo reported a potential conflict of interest on Agenda Item No. 3P as his property is within 500 feet of the proposed project and did not participate on the item. Mayor Pro Tem Yang reported a potential conflict of interest on Agenda Item No. 3P as her business entity is within 500 feet of the proposed project and did not participate o n the item. The City Council a uthorized the City Manager to execute a Professional Services agreement with Mark Thomas, for the preparation of Plans, Specifications and Engineer’s estimates (PS&E) for Garvey Capacity Improvements Project in an amount not to exceed $1,348,896, on Consent Calendar.

3-Q. AWARD OF CONTRACT TO CCS FACILITY SERVICES - LOS ANGELES, INC.

FOR CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES

On January 13, 2025, the City issued a Request for Proposal (“RFP”) for janitorial services and supplies for City -owned facilities, including the City’s Business Improvement District (BID) area, and City parks. Six bids were received by the proposal submittal deadline of February 20, 2025. Upon evaluation and review of all proposal submittals, the Public Works Director (“Director”) is recommending the award of contract to CCS Facility Services – Los Angeles, Inc., for a term commencing on June 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028, with a renewal option of up to two, one-year terms, for a total cost of $482,401.56 per year.

Page 30 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
Action Taken: Mayor Pro Tem Yang reported a potential conflict of interest on Agenda Item No. 3Q as her business entity is within 500 feet of the proposed project and did not participate on the item. The City Council a uthorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with CCS Facility Services – Los Angeles, Inc., in a form approved by the City Attorney, for janitorial services and supplies at various City facilities in an amount not to exceed $482,401.56 per year. The proposed agreement would be from June 1, 2025 through June 30, 2028, with a renewal option of up to two, one- year terms; and a pproved an additional appropriation of $28,200 from the Building Maintenance Fund (506) for janitorial services and supplies through June 30, 2025, on Consent Calendar.

3-R. SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENTS WITH EUROFINS, WECK AND

CLINICAL LAB FOR LAB ANALYSES

The Water Division is requesting approval of the Second Amendment to the Professional Services Agreements with three laboratory firms – Eurofins, Weck, and Clinical Lab – for water analyses services. The amendment will increase the combined not to exceed total from $500,000 to $600,000 for FY2024- 25. The annual budget for subsequent years will remain $500,000.

Action Taken: The City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the Second Amendment, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to the Agreements with Eurofins Eaton Analytica, LLC (2399- AC), Weck Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (2273- AA), and Clinical Lab of San Bernardino, Inc. (2300- AD) to increase the not to exceed combined total from $500,000 to $600,000 for FY2024- 25 costs for laboratory analysis services for the Water Division, on Consent Calendar.

3-S. TREE MEMORIAL PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION FOR THERESA AMADOR

This item was heard after Agenda Item No.1A.

Nominations for the Tree Memorial Recognition Program were advertised and accepted in February 2025. The Recreation and Community Services Department received three nomination applications.

Subsequently, the Tree Memorial Program Ad-hoc Committee, consisting of three Community Participation Commissioners and two Recreation and Parks Commissioners, met to review the nominations and discuss their consideration for a Tree Memorial based on the c riteria established in Resolution Nos—10485 and 11484 (Attachment 1 to the staff report).

Page 31 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
The Committee reviewed all the nomination applications and associated documents. After reviewing the information provided in the nomination application for Theresa Amador (Attachment 2 to the staff report ), the committee voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council approve honoring Theresa Amador with a Tree Memorial for her service and years of volunteerism in the Monterey Park Community. The other submissions were reviewed, and the committee voted not to provide a recommendation to honor the nominees with a Tree Memorial at this time.

If approved by the City Council, Theresa Amador will be honored with a Tree Memorial for her service and positive impact on the Monterey Park community.

Discussion: Director of Recreation and Community Services Aguirre provided a staff report requesting the approval of a tree memorial for Theresa Amador, to honor her years of volunteerism in the Monterey Park community.

Theresa Amador expressed words of appreciation to the City Council and shared her experience serving the Monterey Park community.

Action Taken: The City Council a uthorized the City Manager to take actions to honor Theresa Amador with a memorial tree and plaque.

Motion: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Yang and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

3-T RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTRACT

WITHOUT THE NEED FOR BIDDING PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE § 22050 TO ABATE PUBLIC NUISANCES AT 795 WEST GARVEY

This Item was carried over from the April 16, 2025 5:30 p.m. special City Council Meeting.

Page 32 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
In 2017, the City issued a construction permit to build a commercial retail structure and related improvements for the Property. Construction is estimated to be approximately 80% complete, but has stagnated since at least 2021 with no discernable progress since. This left the property in a state of unfinished construction and blight; the City issued more than $20,000 in unpaid administrative fines primarily for illicit stormwater runoff from the Property resulting from the Property’s state of unfinished construction. Despite the City’s efforts to obtain voluntary compliance, construction activity still has not commenced. Adopting the draft Resolution will facilitate the City’s ability to abate the property.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

City of Solana Beach (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 529: CEQA findings regarding an anticipated imminent emergency are valid).

Action Taken: The City Council ( 1) adopted Resolution No. 2025- R30 declaring an emergency and authorizing contracting without formal bidding pursuant to Public Contracts Code § 22050; (2) authorized the City Manager to execute a standard public works contract, in a form approved with the City Attorney, in accordance with the draft Resolution and select a contractor to abate public nuisance conditions at real property located at 795 West Garvey Avenue (the “Property”) and (3) authorized the City Attorney to take all legal actions required to ensure payment of all costs associated with the City’s abatement by the Property owner pursuant to MPMC Chapter 4.30 or as may otherwise be ordered by the Court, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2025-R30
A RESOLUTION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACTS CODE § 20168 FINDING THAT AN EMERGENCY EXISTS WITHIN THE CITY AND

AUTHORIZING CONTRACTING WITHOUT THE NEED FOR BIDDING
PURSUANT TO § 22050 AND MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL CODE (“MPMC”) CHAPTER 2.52

4. PUBLIC HEARING: None.

5. NEW BUSINESS: None.

Page 33 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025

6. CITY COMMUNICATIONS (CITY COUNCIL)

6-A. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING MAY 6, 2025, THE DAY OF INCLUSION OF THE 143RD ANNIVERSARY OF THE PASSAGE OF THE CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT

Action Taken: The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-R31 declaring May 6, 2025, the Day of Inclusion of the 143rd anniversary of the passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Lo, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Resolution No. 2025-R31

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING MAY 6, 2025, THE DAY OF INCLUSION OF THE 143RD ANNIVERSARY OF THE PASSAGE OF THE CHINESE EXCLUSION ACT

6-B. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AND RECOGNIZING THE MONTH OF APRIL 2025

AS NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH (AS REQUESTED BY

MAYOR PRO TEM YANG)

Action Taken: The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-R32 declaring and recognizing the month of April 2025 as National Arab American Heritage Month.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Sanchez and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Yang, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Resolution No. 2025-R32

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AND RECOGNIZING THE MONTH OF APRIL 2025

AS NATIONAL ARAB AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH

Page 34 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025
6-C. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AND RECOGNIZING THE MONTH OF APRIL 2025

AS NATIONAL PICKLEBALL MONTH (AS REQUESTED BY COUNCIL

MEMBER SANCHEZ)

Action Taken: The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-R33 declaring and recognizing the month of April 2025 as National Pickleball Month.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Sanchez and seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Yang, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Resolution No. 2025-R33

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING AND RECOGNIZING THE MONTH OF APRIL 2025

AS NATIONAL PICKLEBALL MONTH

CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS

Council Member Wong thanked the City staff for their hard work in providing resources for the residents.

Council Member Sanchez echoed the same sentiments and shared his appreciation for his nomination in the Metro San Gabriel Valley Service Council.

Council Member Lo reported his attendance at Assemblymember Mike Fong’s Asian Pacific Islander Listening Session and spoke about his and Council Member Sanchez’s participation at the Junior Friends Program at the Library where they spoke about civi c engagement. He mentioned his attendance to the Mayoral Installation of the City of San Gabriel and emphasized the opportunity to work with neighboring cities on common issues.

Mayor Pro Tem Yang thanked the City staff for their hard work and reported her attendance to the Mayor installation in the City San Gabriel and Arcadia.

Mayor Ngo spoke about his participation at Coffee with a Cop and his meeting with the Mayors in the San Gabriel Valley where he met with Mayor Bass regarding the upcoming events occurring in the Los Angeles Community. He mentioned his attendance at the Mark Keppel High (MKHS) Band Room where the Thompson family pledged a $500,000 legacy gift to the MKHS Band team and showed appreciation for the great security offered during the Cherry Blossom Festival.

Page 35 of 282 ends

xx-xx
April 16, 2025

7. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
By Consensus, the City Council agreed to schedule a Town Hall meeting regarding the status of the Barnes Park pool.

8. CLOSED SESSION (IF REQUIRED; CITY ATTORNEY TO ANNOUNCE) None.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 9 :32 p.m.

__________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk

Approved on MM DD, 2025, at the Regular City Council Meeting

Page 36 of 282 ends

xx-xx

MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

MINUTES

MONTEREY PARK CITY COUNCIL

FINANCING AUTHORITY (MPFA)

HOUSING AUTHORITY (MPHA)

GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT (GHAD)

SUCCESSOR AGENCY (SA)

SPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 21, 2025

The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Special Meeting of the Council at the Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library, Friends Room located at 318 S. Ramona Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Monday, April 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER:

Mayor Ngo called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL:

Deputy City Clerk Trang called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None

ALSO PRESENT: City Manager Inez Alvarez, City Librarian Kristin Olivarez, Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang

VIRTUALLY PRESENT: Annie Stoops, Applicant

AGENDA ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, CHANGES AND ADOPTIONS: None.

PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS: None.

[1.] NEW BUSINESS

1-A. REAPPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

The term for the Library Board of Trustees is three years with the possibility of reappointment for one additional consecutive three-year term.

Travis Kaya’s first term on the Library Board of Trustees will end June 30, 2025. If reappointed, he will serve through June 30, 2028.

Page 37 of 282 ends

XX-XX
April 21, 2025
Action Taken: Council Member Wong reported a potential conflict of interest as he has a personal relationship with applicant , recused himself , and did not participate on the item. The City Council reappointed incumbent Travis Kaya for a second term.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Sanchez and seconded by Council Member Lo, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: Wong

1-A. APPOINTMENT TO THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

The second term of Library Trustee Lisa Duong will end on June 30, 2025, resulting in a vacancy on the Library Board of Trustees. The upcoming vacancy was advertised and the City Clerk’s office has received eight applications from residents interested in serving on the Library Board of Trustees: Olivia Loo, Karen Ramirez, Fabian Raygosa, Annie Stoops, Fionya Tran, Phoi Tran, Sonia Wildhaber and Karl Wong. The City Council is asked to appoint one individual to fill the vacancy for a term beginning July 1, 2025 and ending June 30, 2028.

Discussion: The City Clerk’s office provided the City Council with the unredacted copy of the applications of the candidates for the vacant Library Board seat.

The City Council engaged i n discussion and interviewed Olivia Loo, Karen Ramirez, Fabian Raygosa, Annie Stoops, virtually present, Fionya Tran, and Karl Wong.

Action Taken: The City Council appointed Olivia Loo to fill the vacancy on the Library Board of Trustees.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Wong, Sanchez, Lo, Yang, Ngo
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Page 38 of 282 ends

XX-XX
April 21, 2025

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m.

Maychelle Yee
City Clerk

Approved on MM DD 2025, at the Regular City Council Meeting

Page 39 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.B.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Amy Lee, City Treasurer
Subject: Monthly Investment Report - April 2025

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the monthly investment report; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

As of April 30, 2025, invested funds for the City of Monterey Park total $97,443,724.85.

Background:

In accordance with the City’s Investment Policy, a monthly investment report is presented to the City Council showing the types of investments, dates and maturities, amounts of deposits, rates of interest, and the current market values for securities with maturity more than 12 months. The attached monthly investment report includes a portfolio summary from Chandler Asset Management.

Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A

Fiscal Impact:

N/A

Attachments:

1. 2025.06.04 - SR - Monthly Investment Rpt ATTACHMENT

Page 40 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4, 2025
ATTACHMENT 1
Monthly Investment Report

Page 41 of 282 ends

INVESTMENTS PORTFOLIO PROFILE:

TOTAL BALANCE AT 4/30/2025 97,443,724.85 $

INVESTMENT COMPOSITION
(1)LA COUNTY POOLED INVESTMENT FUND ON DEMAND 3.53% 26,297,267.98$ (2)LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND ON DEMAND 4.281% 37,398,743.43$ (3)CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 4.72% 26,121,713.44$
Purchase Maturity Interest
(4)CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT Date Date Rate
1 UFIRST FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 02/24/23 08/25/25 4.85% 245,000 2 WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK 05/05/23 05/05/25 4.85% 245,000 3 GLOBAL CREDIT UNION 05/12/23 05/12/25 4.85% 245,000
4 BANK OF AMERICA 07/24/24 07/24/25 4.85% 245,000
5 FLASTAR BANK NA 07/25/24 01/26/26 4.85% 245,000
6 CONNEX CU 08/06/24 08/06/25 4.95% 245,000
7 TRUSTONE FINANCIAL FCU 08/15/24 08/15/25 4.45% 245,000 8 PREFERRED BANK 09/03/24 09/03/25 4.41% 100,000
9 PREFERRED BANK 09/08/24 09/08/25 4.41% 150,000
10 FINANCIAL PARTNERS CREDIT UNION 09/13/24 09/12/25 4.35% 245,000 11 BARCLAYS BANK 09/18/24 09/18/25 4.30% 239,000
12 ROCKLAND FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 09/25/24 09/25/25 4.50% 245,000 13 KEYPOINT CREDIT UNION 10/30/24 10/30/25 4.35% 245,000 14 RIZE FED CREDIT UNION 12/13/24 12/14/26 4.25% 245,000 15 FIRST SEACOAST BANK 01/27/25 01/27/27 4.15% 247,000
16 GOLDMAN SACHES BANK 01/28/25 01/28/27 4.15% 244,000
17 FIRST BUSINESS BANK 01/30/25 01/29/27 4.15% 244,000
18 FIRST KY BANK 01/30/25 02/01/27 4.15% 249,000
19 AUSTIN TELCO FED CREDIT UNION 01/31/25 02/01/27 4.25% 249,000 20 SOUND CREDIT UNION 01/31/25 02/01/27 4.20% 249,000
21 MORGAN STANLEY BANK 02/12/25 02/12/27 4.30% 244,000
22 MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK 02/12/25 02/12/27 4.30% 244,000 23 OREGON COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION 02/24/25 02/24/27 4.30% 249,000 24 MERRICK BANK 02/28/25 02/26/27 4.30% 249,000
25 FIRST WESTERN TRUST BANK 03/06/25 03/06/26 4.25% 249,000 26 SOUTHERN STATES BANK 03/21/25 03/22/27 4.15% 249,000 27 CORPORATE AMERICA FAMILY CREDIT UNION03/27/25 03/27/26 4.25% 249,000 28 PARKWAY BANK & TRUST 03/27/25 03/27/26 4.20% 239,000 29 INSBANK 03/31/25 03/30/26 4.20% 249,000
30 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SAVINGS BANK 04/10/25 04/12/27 4.00% 245,000 31 UBS BANK 04/23/25 04/23/27 3.95% 249,000
32 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK 04/30/25 04/30/27 4.05% 245,000 Total CDs (32) 4.360% 7,626,000.00$
OTHER INFORMATION:

BANK BALANCE: (1) $27,919,606.73
AVERAGE MATURITY DAYS 205
AVERAGE INTEREST RATE FOR THE MONTH 4.185%

THE CITY'S INVESTMENT HAS SUFFICIENT LIQUIDITY TO MEET THE CITY'S EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NEXT 180 DAYS. THE 180-DAY LIQUIDITY DISCLOSURE IS REQUIRED PER GOVERNMENT CODE 53646.

THERE HAVE BEEN NO VARIANCES TO THE INVESTMENT POLICY.
(1) Bank balance is maintained to cover outstanding warrants, payroll checks and on-going operating costs.

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

INVESTMENT REPORT
APRIL 30, 2025

Page 42 of 282 ends

City of Monterey Park | Account #11189 | As of April 30, 2025PORTFOLIO SUMMARYAccount Summary Total Rate of Return** 1M 3M YTD 1YR 2YRS 3YRS 5YRS 10YRS(03/12/24)City of Monterey ParkBenchmark Return AA+2.251.90End Values as of 03/31/2025End Values as of 04/30/2025Market ValueAccrued InterestTotal Market Value 26,466,268.55 26,664,513.110.00 0.00ParBook ValueCost ValueFarm Credit System

Page 43 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.C.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Philip Lanzafame, Interim Director of Community Development Subject: Waive further reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Title 2 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) to dissolve the Design Review Board ("DRB").

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Waiving the second reading and adopting the proposed Ordinance; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The Ordinance was introduced and received first reading at the May 21, 2025 City Council meeting; and included directions from Council for the Interim Director of Community Development (“Director”) to modify the ordinance by removing references to the DRB in MPMC sections 1.10.010 and 21.14.140. The original staff report (from May 21, 2025) is attached for reference. Second reading and adoption of this Ordinance is recommended. If adopted, the ordinance will take effect in 30 days.

Background:

See Attachment 1 - May 21, 2025 City Council Report.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This proposed action supports the City's goal to strengthen the local economy and enhance housing opportunities by dissolving the DRB. The dissolution will reduce redundancy, increase effectiveness and efficiency, enhance the City's ability to address the needs of its businesses and residents and promote sustainable economic growth and development.

Fiscal Impact:

No fiscal impact is associated with dissolving the DRB (other than administrative costs associated with codifying the Ordinance).

Attachments:

Page 44 of 282 ends

1. DRB Dissolution Ordinance - 2nd Reading

2. City Council Staff Report, dated May 21, 2025 (without attachments)

Page 45 of 282 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Ordinance – DRB Dissolution

Page 46 of 282 ends

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL

CODE DISSOLVING THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD
The City Council of the City of Monterey Park does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1:Findings. The City Council finds and declares that:

A. On February 27, 1984 City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1615 and created the Architectural Review Board, to act as an advisory body, to ensure a high quality of architectural and design standards in buildings, landscaping, signed and general appearance of development projects so as to conserve use of land and maintain a proper relationship between the taxable value of real property and the cost of providing municipal services.

B. On April 13, 1987 City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1696 revising the Architectural Review Board and renaming it the “Design Review Boards” (“DRB”) to provide a professional and coordinated process of development review and administration.

C. On July 15, 2020 City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2181 revising the duties and responsibilities of the Planning Commission and DRB in order to streamline the City’s land use planning and permitting process, by adjusting responsibilities to be absorbed by the city staff, City Planner, or the Planning Commission. Referral of projects to the DRB can be made by the City Planner, Planning Commission, or the City Council.

D. Since the enactment of Ordinance No. 2181, city staff, the City Planner, and Planning Commission have provided design decisions and recommendations to applicants and developers. Further, new state laws have encouraged or mandated objective design standards to ensure a more efficient development process.

Consequently, a DRB meeting has not been requested to review projects related to design.

E. Special Joint Commission meetings scheduled in 2022 and 2024 and the DRB did not have a quorum, further demonstrating the diminished need for its functions.

F. After careful consideration and evaluation, the DRB’s functions and responsibilities are adequately dispersed to the City Planner, Planning Commission, and City Council, and the dissolution of the DRB is in the best interest of the City.

SECTION 2:Amendment. Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) sections

1.10.010(d), 2.56.030, and 2.56.040 are repealed in their entirety. MPMC section

21.14.140 is amended to replace references to the “Design Review Board” with “City Planner.”

Page 47 of 282 ends

Ordinance No.

SECTION 3:Environmental Review. This Ordinance was reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq.. the “CEQA Guidelines”). Based upon that review, this Ordinance is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.

SECTION 4:Renumbering. All MPMC subsections affected by changes implemented by this Ordinance are appropriately renumbered.

SECTION 5:Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 6:Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council’s intent that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.

SECTION 7:Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its Application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 8:Recordation. The City Clerk, or designee, is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of Monterey Park’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of this meeting; and, within 15 days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law.

SECTION 9:Effective Date. This Ordinance will become effective 30 days after second reading and adoption.
(Mayor signature and attestation must be on the same page.) PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of _________, 2025.
____________________________
Vinh Ngo, Mayor
ATTEST:

Page 48 of 282 ends

Ordinance No.
________________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
By:________________________________
Justin A. Tamayo, Assistant City Attorney

Page 49 of 282 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
City Council Staff Report, dated May 21, 2025
(without attachments)

Page 50 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: May 21, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 11.B.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Philip Lanzafame, Interim Director of Community Development Subject: Consider dissolution of the Design Review Board (DRB) and creating the Economic and Business Development Commission (EBDC) by consolidating the Business Improvement Advisory Committee (BIDAC) and Economic Development Advisory Commission (EDAC)

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Introducing and waiving first reading of an Ordinance _________ dissolving the Design Review Board (“DRB”);

2. Adopting a resolution consolidating the Business Improvement Advisory Committee (“BIDAC”) and the Economic Development Advisory Commission (“EDAC”) into the Economic and Business Development Commission (“EBDC”);

3. Appointing the members of the EBDC; and

4. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the draft Ordinance and Resolution according to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. "CEQA") and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the "CEQA Guidelines"). This activity is for general policies and procedure-making intended to promote economic development and streamlining of planning processes.

Accordingly, this activity is exempt from further review.

Executive Summary:

The dissolution and consolidation of committees and commissions aims to streamline operations, enhance collaboration, and provide a more comprehensive approach to planning and economic development within the City. Since 2020, the Planning Commission assumed most responsibilities of the DRB; that Board has not met in five years. The newly created EBDC will maintain the core responsibilities of both existing BIDAC and EDAC commissions.

Background:

To help in City governance, City Council established several commissions, boards, and committees (collectively, a "commission") in accordance with Monterey Park Municipal Code

Page 51 of 282 ends

("MPMC") Chapter 2.82. The Commissions are advisory to the City Council and are provided with limited decision making authority, which is conferred by MPMC 2.82 and City Council resolution.

Design Review Board (“DRB”)

The DRB is a body that was originally established as the Architectural Review Board by Ordinance No. 1615 (1984). Through its evolution as a body, the panel met to advise the Planning Commission and/or City Council regarding high quality design standards in building and development projects in order to conserve and maintain the aesthetic value of the community.

In July 2020, Ordinance No. 2181 established that DRB meetings would be required "on an annual basis, or as requested by the City Planner, the Planning Commission, or the City Council." The last DRB meeting took place on February 18, 2020. Between February and July 2020, all DRB meetings were canceled due to the pandemic. With the enactment of Ordinance No. 2181, the DRB became an ad hoc committee, meeting only when necessary.

While DRB meetings were scheduled in 2022 and 2024, they were canceled for lack of a quorum.

Ordinance No. 2181, shifted many of the DRB's responsibilities to the City Planner and, when necessary, the Planning Commission and/or City Council.

Dissolution of the DRB supports the City's Business Recovery Program, which seeks to streamline the development process by reducing the number of public meetings or hearings required for development projects. Additionally, in recent years, many new State laws also encourage and require streamlining of projects, especially those related to housing to ensure more efficient development process.

Business Improvement District Advisory Committee (“BIDAC”) and Economic Development Advisory Committee (“EDAC”)

Two City advisory commissions focus on overlapping areas of economic development and business improvement district operations:

1. The BIDAC is primarily responsible for the oversight and recommendations related to the Downtown Business Improvement District (BID).

2. The EDAC focuses on the broader economic development strategic plan and the City's overall economic health.

Each commission is comprised of five members and holds separate meetings (quarterly for BIDAC and monthly for EDAC). Both commissions operate under the City's guidance, with the Economic Development Manager as their staff liaison.

Maintaining two separate economic development advisory commissions results in redundancy and a lack of integrated strategic planning. To streamline advisory functions, improve communication, and ensure consistency, it is proposed to consolidate these two commissions into one unified advisory commission.

Page 52 of 282 ends

1. Proposed Commission Name:
o The new commission will be named the Economic and Business Development Commission (“EBDC”) to indicate the commission's advisory focus on economic development and business improvement.

2. Frequency of Meetings:
o The Commission will hold quarterly meetings with special meetings as needed, ensuring more consistent oversight and coordination.

3. Number of Commission Members:
o The number of commissioners will be set at five. This provides a broad range of expertise and representation while maintaining a manageable quorum, balancing Downtown business interests and Citywide economic development perspectives, with at least three commissioners owning property or operating a business in the Downtown Business Improvement District (“BID”). o Initial Appointment: It is recommended that the new commission be populated with active participants from the membership of the two existing commissions.

While EDAC and BIDAC are structured to have five seats each, current circumstances have resulted in fewer actively participating members. EDAC presently has one vacant seat and two active members. There are two other EDAC commissioners (EDAC Seat 3 and Seat 5) whose other obligations have caused them to miss meetings and become disengaged. BIDAC currently has one vacant seat and four active members; two members have “termed-out” and are serving on extended terms until a replacement is identified.

To ensure continuity and leverage the experience of the actively engaged members, it is recommended that the City Council appoint the existing two active members of EDAC and three of the four existing active members of BIDAC to become commissioners of the new EBDC. In addition to thanking the inactive commissioners for their service and phasing out those seats as part of the consolidation, the Commissioner occupying BIDAC Seat #3 has agreed to end his extended term and withdraw from service. This would result in five commissioners for the newly formed EBDC. It is necessary to reassign appointed seats and in some cases, the appointing Council member to reconcile the new commission as identified in the adopting resolution.

4. Economic and Business Development Commission Core Roles and Responsibilities:
o Economic Development Strategic Plan: Monitor and recommend the City's Economic Development Strategic Plan updates.
o Downtown Business District Management: Make recommendations to the City staff regarding the BID's operations, marketing, and revenue management. o BID Revenue Management: Make recommendations to the City staff regarding how revenue is derived from the charges, assessments, and contributions imposed by MPMC Chapter 5.82 and Streets and Highways Code § 36500, et seg.
o Business Support and Advocacy: Serve as liaison between the City and the business community, providing recommendations for support, resources, and

Page 53 of 282 ends

advocacy for local businesses.

5. Commission Membership Criteria:
o Downtown District Representation: At least three commissioners must own property or operate/manage a business within the BID.
o Citywide Representation: Commissioners must be Monterey Park residents with business experience or have a finance, economic, or development background.

6. City Staff Liaison Role:
o The Economic Development Manager, who currently serves as the liaison for BIDAC and EDAC, will serve as the staff liaison for the new commission.

7. The proposed EBDC will provide the following benefits:
o Streamlined Operations: Consolidating BIDAC and EDAC will reduce redundancy and enhance efficiency by having a single advisory commission, combining resources and staff time for a single commission rather than two. o Comprehensive Economic Vision: Unifying EDAC and BIDAC into the new EBDC will provide a more holistic and integrated approach to economic development, encompassing Downtown revitalization and Citywide initiatives, allowing for consistent, timely recommendations for both Downtown-specific and Citywide economic issues.
o Enhanced Collaboration: The consolidated commission will facilitate integrated discussions among Downtown stakeholders, residents, and business professionals with Citywide interests.
o Increased Efficiency and Effectiveness: The new commission will have fewer meetings overall and a more focused agenda during quarterly or special meetings.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This proposed commission consolidation supports the City's goal to strengthen the local economy and enhance housing opportunities by dissolving the DRB and consolidating BIDAC and EDAC into the EBDC. The consolidation will reduce redundancy, increase effectiveness and efficiency, enhance the City's ability to address the needs of its businesses and residents and promote sustainable economic growth and development.

Fiscal Impact:

No fiscal impact is associated with consolidating the BIDAC and EDAC commissions and dissolving the DRB (other than administrative costs associated with codifying the Ordinance).

Instead, the City may realize modest savings by reducing the frequency of separate meetings, consolidating noticing requirements, and centralizing staff support.

Attachments:

1. Ordinance – DRB Dissolution

2. Resolution – EBDC Creation and EDAC/BIDAC Consolidation

Page 54 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.D.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: LV Frazier, Acting City Librarian
Subject: Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to accept additional California Library Association Zip Book Grant funding and appropriate funding into 2024-25 Fiscal year budget

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to accept an additional $1,248 in California Library Association Zip Book grant funding to purchase books;

2. Authorizing the Finance Director to appropriate the $1,248 funding into the 2024-25 Fiscal Year budget; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The Library was notified of a $1,248 grant augmentation from the California State Library. The grant funds will be utilized to continue to offer the Zip Books program, which allows library cardholders to request books that are not already owned by the Library and have them delivered directly to their home via Amazon Prime.

Background:

This is the third year the Library has received the Zip Books grant. The Zip Books program was implemented in Fiscal Year 2022-23 with a goal of providing library patrons with quick and convenient access to books that are not already available in the Library’s collection.

Requested books are shipped directly to the patron via Amazon Prime, then added to the Library’s collection when they are returned to the library so that others may check them out.

The Library was awarded an additional $1,248 in funds by the California State Library to augment the Library’s current Zip Books grant award; The grant cycle for the Zip Books grant ends on August 31, 2025.

Strategic Plan Goal:

The project expands access to community resources and services by enhancing community

Page 55 of 282 ends

programs and public spaces.

Fiscal Impact:

This action will add $1,248 to the 2024-25 Fiscal year budget. This is a single year grant and no matching funds are required for this grant.

Attachments:

1. Zip Books Project Augmentation Grant Award Letter

Page 56 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4, 2025
ATTACHMENT 1
Zip Books Project Augmentation
Grant Award Letter

Page 57 of 282 ends

Library—Courts Building P.O. Box 942837 Sacramento, CA 94237-0001 May 01,2025

Kristin Olivarez, City Librarian
Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library
318 S Ramona Ave
Monterey Park, CA, 91754

Subject: Zip Books Project Augmentation, Grant Award #ZIP 24-52 Title: Zip Books Project

Dear Ms. Kristin Olivarez:

We are pleased to approve the following augmentation for the above referenced grant.

The grant monitor assigned to this project is Monica Rivas and can be reached at [email protected]. The Project Consultant assigned to this project is Annly Roman and can be reached at [email protected]. Please continue to work with them in implementing your project.

This letter is an official amendment to the subject Zip Books grant award and must remain a part of all existing copies of that document. Please note, due to the pandemic, hard copies of this correspondence will not follow. Please keep this correspondence for your files and consider these original copies.

Respectfully yours,

Greg Lucas
California State Librarian

cc: Annly Roman, [email protected]
Monica Rivas, [email protected]
Yesenia Udarbe, [email protected]
Michael Le, [email protected]
Budget Category Original Budget Approved
Adjustments Revised Budget
(a) Salaries/Wages/Benefits $0 $0 $0
(b) Consultant Fees $0 $0 $0
(c) Travel $0 $0 $0
(d) Supplies/Materials $5,525 $1,248 $6,773
(e) Equipment ($5,000 or more per unit) $0 $0 $0
(f) Services $139 $0 $139
Project Total $5,664 $0 $6,912
(g) Indirect Cost $0 $0 $0
Total $5,664 $1,248 $6,912
Docusign Envelope ID: AD57768A-B03F-4CB1-B986-AF09C3CCE36F

Page 58 of 282 ends

Amendment - ZIP24-52_Monterey Park Bruggemeyer
Library_05.01.25
Amendment Information
Amendment Request Name ZIP24-52_Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library_05.01.25 Amendment Type Amendment Request
Date Created 5/1/2025 10:04 AM
Created By Admin User
Status Submitted
Areas to Amend
Awarded Amount
Award Duration
Budget
Awarded Amount
Current Total Awarded Amount
Requested Total Awarded Amount
Justification
The Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library has been notified of an opportunity to receive additional Zip Books grant funding. As the library has already exhausted its original funding allocation, this opportunity will allow the library to quickly put books in the hands of more patrons.
$5,664.00
$1,248.00
383838
5/1/25, 11:01 AM AmpliFund - California State Library - Amendments https://www.gotomygrants.com/Grants/Amendments/ResponseDetails/150c1547-ae26-f011-8b3d-6045bdeddbd9 1/3 Docusign Envelope ID: AD57768A-B03F-4CB1-B986-AF09C3CCE36F

Page 59 of 282 ends

Awarded Amount - Response
Reasoning
Internal Notes 
Budget
Proposed Budget Revision
Download the current budget, update, and then upload your proposed budget revision. Do not change any column headers to ensure the budget changes can be applied if the request is approved.

Current Budget Download Budget
Budget Revision* ZIP24-52_Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library_05.01.25.xlsx Summary of Changes Narrative* Add $1,248 to Supplies and Materials 383838
5/1/25, 11:01 AM AmpliFund - California State Library - Amendments https://www.gotomygrants.com/Grants/Amendments/ResponseDetails/150c1547-ae26-f011-8b3d-6045bdeddbd9 2/3 Docusign Envelope ID: AD57768A-B03F-4CB1-B986-AF09C3CCE36F

Page 60 of 282 ends

Summary of Proposed Changes
Category Line Item Current Direct Cost New Direct Cost Net Change Match Grant-Funded D. Supplies and
Materials
Supplies and
Materials $5,525.00 $6,773.00 $1,248.00 $0.00 $1,248.00 F. Services Services $139.00 $139.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Changes $1,248.00 $0.00 $1,248.00
Justification
The library has been notified of an opportunity to receive an additional $1,248 in Zip Books grant funds.

These funds will be applied to Supplies and Materials and used to purchase books requested by library patrons through the Zip Books program.

Attachments
Budget - Response
Reasoning
Attachments
Internal Notes
Amendment History
05/01/2025 10:21 AM Amendment requestsubmittedby Admin User 05/01/2025 10:04 AM Amendment requestdraft createdby Admin User 383838
5/1/25, 11:01 AM AmpliFund - California State Library - Amendments https://www.gotomygrants.com/Grants/Amendments/ResponseDetails/150c1547-ae26-f011-8b3d-6045bdeddbd9 3/3 Docusign Envelope ID: AD57768A-B03F-4CB1-B986-AF09C3CCE36F

Page 61 of 282 ends

CALIFORNIA LIBRARY SERVICES ACT

FINANCIAL CLAIM

AUGMENT PAYMENT

CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury: that I am the duly authorized representative of the claimant herein; that this claim is in all respects true, correct and in accordance with law and the terms of the agreement; and that payment has not previously been received for the amount claimed herein.

(Signature of the Authorized Representative)

(Print Name) (Title)

*Legal payee name must match the payee’s federal tax return. Warrant will be made payable to payee name. Payee discrepancies in name and/or address may cause delay in payment. If you need to change payee name and/or address, please contact Fiscal Services at [email protected].

State of California, State Library Fiscal Office

ENY: 2024 ITEM NO: 6120-211-0001, Chapter 22, Statutes of 2024 PURCHASING AUTHORITY NUMBER: CSL-6120 REPORTING STRUCTURE: 61202000 COA: 5432000 PROGRAM #: 5312
FAIN: LS or N/A
By Date
(State Library Representative)

Grant Award #: ZIP24-52 Date:

Invoice #:

ZIP24-52-03 PO #:

7753
Payee Name: City of Monterey Park
(Legal name of authorized agency to receive, disburse and account for funds*) Complete Address:

Street Address, City, State, Zip Code (Warrant will be mailed to this address) Amount Claimed: $1,248.00 Type of Payment:
(Payable Upon Execution of Agreement) ☐ PROGRESS
Grantee Name: City of Monterey Park ☐ FINAL (Name on Award Letter and Agreement) ☐ IN FULL
Project Title: Zip Books Project ☒ AUGMENT
For Period From: upon execution to end of grant period
Docusign Envelope ID: AD57768A-B03F-4CB1-B986-AF09C3CCE36F Kristin Olivarez City Librarian
5/8/2025
320 W. Newmark Ave., Monterey Park, CA 91754
5/9/2025

Page 62 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.E.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Receive and file a summary of The Windstorm and Firestorm Local Emergency

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing this staff report summarizing the status of windstorm and firestorm local emergency; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Executive Summary:

Background:

Page 63 of 282 ends

windstorm and firestorm events are ongoing. This will continue to result in increased prices for construction products and contractor services. Additionally, recently implemented tariffs on construction material further increase prices for services and products. Expediting the City’s ability to secure contracts for capital improvement projects is in the public interest. Many of the approved public works projects are intended to improve vital infrastructure such as roads, water, stormwater, and wastewater facilities.
• The Governor’s Executive Order dated January 12, 2025, directs state agencies to streamline building approvals. This order remains effective. It is in the public interest for the City to jumpstart that process to assist developers seeking to build within the City’s jurisdiction.
• Fire prevention is always critical. The current emergency, however, starkly emphasized the immediate need to exercise the City’s police powers to protect public health and safety. This, among other things, includes undergrounding power lines to the greatest extent practicable. The City Attorney’s Office is working with SCE to move undergrounding forward as expeditiously as possible.
• The City expended public resources (personnel, equipment, gas, etc.) while assisting neighboring jurisdictions during this emergency. It is in the public interest for the City to seek reimbursementfrom federal and state agencies for these costs.

Since the adoption of Resolution 2025-R3 the City awarded the following public works contracts:

Strategic Plan Goal:

Resolution No. 2025-R3 meets the City’s goal to maintain, build and modernize infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our city and community.

Fiscal Impact:

Page 64 of 282 ends

The costs for awarded contracts are budgeted within the City’s FY 2024-25 CIP.

Attachments:

None

Page 65 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.F.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Amendment to Agreement 1980-A with Sebastian Waterworks, Inc., DBA Mr.

Rooter Plumbing of South San Gabriel

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Sixth Amendment with Sebastian Waterworks, Inc., DBA Mr. Rooter Plumbing of South San Gabriel, in a form approved by the City Attorney, for on-call commercial plumbing services at City-owned facilities in an amount not to exceed $205,000. The Amendment extends the term through June 30, 2026; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Executive Summary:

Sebastian Waterworks, Inc., DBA Mr. Rooter Plumbing of South San Gabriel currently provides on-call and after-hour emergency commercial plumbing services at various City-Owned facilities. It is recommended City Council authorize an amendment to the current contract for a not to exceed amount of $205,000 and extend the agreement for 12 months through June 30, 2026. The extension will allow staff to complete necessary replacements to the failing floor drains in the Engineering and PD jail areas, and prepare a notice inviting bids for a new on-call commercial plumbing services contract.

Background:

The City contracted with Mr. Rooter Plumbing of Southern San Gabriel (“Mr. Rooter”) following a competitive bidding process for on-call commercial plumbing services held in 2017. Mr.

Rooter has since provided the City with reliable on-call commercial plumbing and after-hour emergency services at their original service rates through 2023 and with an increase effective

Page 66 of 282 ends

2024. Mr. Rooter’s maintenance services support the Public Works maintenance operations for various facilities. Additionally, the Recreation Department may use Mr. Rooter’s services for pool maintenance services. It is recommended that City Council authorize an Amendment to their agreement to consolidate services from various divisions to one agreement and extend the agreement for continuation of services through Fiscal Year 2025-26. Staff obtained service rates from other local vendors such as Lots Plumbing, Inc. and Crosby Plumbing, Inc. and Mr.

Rooter’s rates were still lower than their competitors. The proposed Amendment would extend the agreement’s term through June 30, 2026, allowing the Public Works Director to prepare a notice inviting bids for a new commercial plumbing services contract.

Strategic Plan Goal:

The proposed Amendment supports the City’s goal to maintain, build and modernize infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our City and Community.

Commercial plumbing services are essential to maintaining facilities and completing necessary public facility improvements.

Fiscal Impact:

The cost for the proposed amendment is $145,000. Commercial plumbing services are primarily funded by the City’s Building Maintenance Fund (506). There are sufficient funds in the FY 2024-2025 budget for services through June 30th, 2025. A budget of $145,000 for plumbing services is included in the FY 2025-2026 budget.

Attachments:

1. Mr. Rooter Plumbing of South San Gabriel rate sheet

2. Lots Plumbing, Inc. rate sheet

3. Crosby Plumbing, Inc. rate sheet

Page 67 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4,2025
ATTACHMENT 1
Mr. Rooter Plumbing of South San Gabriel rate
sheet

Page 68 of 282 ends

ffiwg,pn
April9, 2025
City of Monterey Park
320 W. Newmark Ave.

Monterey Park, CA 9L754
Scope of work:

Provide on call plumbing service, including after-hour emergency service, holiday and weekends. Repair and replace plumbing fixtures, pipes, hydro jetting drain and sewer piping, PUffiP, maintenance of drain and sewer piping. CCTV sewer and storm drain inspections. Maintenance and replacing toilets, sinks, water heaters and floor sinks.

Respectfully Submitted:
/*D*f
Mr. Rooter Plumbing
1 Mr. Rooter Plumbing
PO Box 3735 Montebello Ce' 90640
Phone: (323)121-1243 Fax: (323) 721-5330
Email: diazm rrooterplumbin [email protected]

Page 69 of 282 ends

€w&#*
Proposal Fee Sheet
Regutar business hours are 6:30am to 5:30pm Monday through Friday Hotiday rates go into effect on the hotiday observed by the city 41712025
ExhibitA
Regutar Hours After Hours
Hourty Rate for Master Plumber
Hourty Rate for.lourneyman Plumber
Hourty rate for HYdro Jetting
Hourty rate for Hydro Jetting Each additional Hour
Hourly Rate for Video lnsPections
Hourty Rate for Dump Truckwith Operator
Hourty Rate for Backhoe with Operator
Hourty Rate for backftow testing
Cabting of !-!12" to 4" drain tines through accessible
cteanouts
Additional RePair ltems
Cutting Concrete
Reptacement of Concrete
Cutting of AsPhatt
Reptacement of 8" CtaY PiPe
SturrySeat
$zes.oo
$225.00
$875.00
$575.00
$43s.oo
$45o.oo
$s75.oo
$2Be.oo
$geg.oo
$427.50
$337.50
$ezs.oo
$575.00
$435.00
$ozs.oo
$862,50
$433.50
$389.00
$13.26 Per Square Foot
$26 Per Square Foot
$r3.z0 Per Square Foot
$487.50 Per Square Foot
$19.50 Per Square Foot
Att above per square foot cost for concrete and asphatt onty are estimated at 4" thickness
Hourty rate above shatt inctude charges for apprentices and/or laborers accompanying maSter ptumber or lourneyman on maintenance calts

Page 70 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4,2025
ATTACHMENT 2
Lots Plumbing, lnc. rate sheet

Page 71 of 282 ends

Date March26,2025
To: City of MontereY Park
320 W. Newmark Ave. Monterey Park, CA9L754
Attn: Skyler Hecox
Em ail : shecox@ monterevpark.ca'sov
Hourly Rate Plumber
Regular Hours $340.00 and After Hours $510'00
Hourly Rate JourneYman
Regular Hours $280.00 and After Hours $420'00
Hourly Rate HYdro Jetting
Regular Hours $1,020.00 and After Hours $1,530'00
Hourly Rate Video InsPections
Regular Hours $585.00 and After hours $785'00
Hourly Rate Dump Truck with Operator
Regular Hours $1,375.00 and After Hours $1,975'00
Hourly Rate Backhoe with OPerator
Regular Hours $975.00 and After Hours $1,389'00
Hourly Rate Backflow Testing
Regular hours $349.00 and After Hours $595'00
Lots Plumbing lnc 4060 N. Palm st. ste 605, Fullerton cA 92835 Tel 888-888-1403

Page 72 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4,2025
ATTACHMENT 3
Crosby Plumbing, lnc. rate sheet

Page 73 of 282 ends

Crosby Plumbing, Inc.
371 Crosby st, Alladena, CA 91001
Phons (626) 765.9672
Fax {626) 765'9873
License# 994trXJ / DIR*-1000004513

PROPOSAL
Drt€
o4to2l2a25
of MoJob Name: Park
Address: 320 W. Newmark Ave cA91754
rough per and
Plumber
Reg ttours $355 & After Hours $523
Journevman
Reg Hours $282 & After Hours $423
Hvdro Jottlno
Reg Hours $ 'l ,115 & After Hours $1 ,675
Y!Ccc.&ss$lle!
REg Hours $ 535 & Afier l-tours $802
Duma Truck wlth oo€r€tor
Reg Hours $ 550 & Afler Hours $825
Baclhoe wlth Oporator
Reg xours $ 715 & After Hours $1 '075
Erct-[elutregrc
Reg Hours $ 355 & After Hours $532
We hereby propose to furnish labor and materials - complete in accordance wth the above specifications $For the sum of
Anthony Tatikian
slandard
and will
This is

ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL
The above price, specification and conditions ale hereby accepled' You are authorized to do Date Signature
the work as specified.

Page 74 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.G.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Martha Garcia, Director of Finance
Subject: Receive and file the Cost Allocation Plan Study

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the Cost Allocation Plan study; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The Finance Department oversees the comprehensive cost allocation process, which includes the Indirect Cost Allocation Plan (CAP). The primary purpose of the cost allocation plan is to ensure that the City's method of identifying and distributing indirect costs is fair, comprehensive, well-documented, and defendable.

The last CAP was completed in 2018, by Willdan Financial Services (Willdan). Considering Willdan’s extensive experience with the City, both with allocation plan preparation as well as cost-of-service analysis for the City’s user fees, in August of 2024, the City contracted with it to prepare an updated CAP Study.

Background:

The purpose of the CAP is to ensure the City identifies all costs associated with activities, including administrative overhead, to determine the true cost of providing various City services, as well as indirect costs attributable to enterprise and other chargeable funds.

The CAP determines the appropriate allocation of costs from internal service departments to the operating departments. Examples of internal services are City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance, and City Council. The direct cost centers, which are considered operating departments, are the divisions and funds that require support from internal services and provide services directly to the community through their day-to-day operations. Examples of operating departments are Police, Public Works, and the Community Development Department. The CAP allocates the costs of the internal services to the operating departments, based on the nature of the functions of each internal service upon which the operating

Page 75 of 282 ends

departments depend. This is done to determine the total cost associated with providing direct services. The overall goal of the cost allocation plan process is to allow cities to allocate a portion of the internal service costs to the operating departments, thus 1) accounting for “all” costs, direct and indirect, for each operating department, and 2) facilitating the calculation of a fully burdened cost estimate of providing services to the public.

The City’s current cost allocation rate of 25.4% is based on a CAP study last conducted in 2018 by Willdan. Considering that it has been six years since the last study, in August of 2024, city staff again contracted with Willdan to prepare a new CAP study to develop a current methodology, and associated outcomes linked to present day City organization and practices.

The new study supports an increase in the CAP in FY 2025-2026 budget of up to 45%.

This study includes two primary components: an Indirect Cost Allocation Plan (Indirect Costs) and an Internal Service Funds Cost Allocation Methodology. The Indirect Cost Allocation Plan aims to recover the General Fund's overhead costs of providing indirect support services to operating departments and programs. The Internal Service Funds Cost Allocation Methodology aims to develop a full cost allocation methodology to recover all associated annual operating costs of internal service funds from interagency customers.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This item supports Council Strategic Goal 2, "To Maintain Fiscal Stability of our City's Financial Resources". This comprehensive review and analysis of indirect costs ensures the City charges accurately reflect the cost of services.

Fiscal Impact:

The maximum proposed indirect cost rate of 45% is the recommended rate from Willdan to allow the City to adequately recover the full administration of indirect costs. This rate impacts certain fees identified in the City’s Master Schedule of Fees and Charges, which will be considered by the City Council at a future date. The Council may, at that time, determine whether to utilize the full indirect cost for individual fees, or adopt a lower rate.

Attachments:

1. Willdan Financial Services Cost Allocation Plan Study

Page 76 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4, 2025

ATTACHMENT 1
Willdan Financial Services
Updated Cost Allocation Plan Study

Page 77 of 282 ends

City of Monterey Park, CA
Cost Allocation Plan

Page 78 of 282 ends

i Cost Allocation Plan

Table of Contents
Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................................... ii Certification of Cost Allocation Plan ................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Approach .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Applications .................................................................................................................................................................. 7 OMB Super Circular and 2 CFR Part 200 ....................................................................................................................... 7 Central Service Departments ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Distribution Bases ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Allocable Costs and Distribution Bases .......................................................................................................... 10 Allocable Costs ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 Central Service Allocation Methodology .................................................................................................................... 11 Section 1: City Attorney ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Section 2: City Clerk ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Section 3: City Council ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Section 4: City Manager ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Section 5: City Treasurer ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Section 6: Finance .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Section 7: Human Resources ................................................................................................................................. 14 Section 8: Media Production.................................................................................................................................. 15 Section 9: Nondepartmental .................................................................................................................................. 16 Section 10: Revenue Collection ............................................................................................................................. 16 Section 11: Retirement .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Iterative Allocation ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Appendix A ..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix B ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix C ..................................................................................................................................................... 29

Page 79 of 282 ends

ii Cost Allocation Plan

List of Tables
Table 1: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments (OMB Compliant CAP) .................................................... 3 Table 2: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments (Full CAP) ........................................................................ 4 Table 3: Allocable Cost Summary ................................................................................................................... 10 Table A-1a: Initial Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) ................................................................. 20 Table A-1b: Initial Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) – continued ............................................. 21 Table A-2a: Final Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) .................................................................. 22 Table A-2b: Final Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) – continued .............................................. 23 Table A-3a: Final Allocation Amounts (OMB Compliant CAP) ....................................................................... 24 Table A-3b: Final Allocation Amounts (OMB Compliant CAP) – continued ................................................... 25 Table B-1a: Final Allocation Amounts (Full CAP)............................................................................................ 27 Table B-1b: Final Allocation Amounts (Full CAP) - continued ........................................................................ 28 Table C: Administrative Indirect Table ........................................................................................................... 30

Page 80 of 282 ends

1 Cost Allocation Plan

Certification of Cost Allocation Plan
This is to certify that I have reviewed the cost allocation plan submitted herewith and to the best of my knowledge and belief:
(1) All costs included in this proposal 3/31/2025 to establish cost allocations or billings for Fiscal Year 2025 are allowable in accordance with the requirements of this Part and the Federal award(s) to which they apply.

Unallowable costs have been adjusted for in allocating costs as indicated in the cost allocation plan. (2) All costs included in this proposal are properly allocable to Federal awards on the basis of a beneficial or causal relationship between the expenses incurred and the Federal awards to which they are allocated in accordance with applicable requirements. Further, the same costs that have been treated as indirect costs have not been claimed as direct costs. Similar types of costs have been accounted for consistently.

I declare that the foregoing is true and correct.

Governmental Unit: City of Monterey Park

Signature: ___________________________________________________________________

Name of Official: ___________________________________________________________________

Title: ___________________________________________________________________

Date of Execution: ___________________________________________________________________

Page 81 of 282 ends

2 Cost Allocation Plan

Executive Summary
This cost allocation plan (“CAP”) summarizes a comprehensive analysis that has been completed for the City of Monterey Park, California (the “City”) to determine the appropriate allocation of costs from central service departments to the operating departments. The primary objective is to allocate costs from departments that provide services internally to operating departments that conduct the day-to-day operations necessary to serve the community. The internal service costs typically represent (a) incurred for a common or joint purpose benefiting more than one cost objective, and (b) not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted, without effort disproportionate to the results achieved. The term "indirect costs," as used herein, applies to costs of this type originating in the central service departments.

To ensure central service department costs are appropriately allocated to the operating departments, Willdan analyzed the City’s cost code structure to determine which types of costs are allowable versus unallowable in accordance with standard and accepted cost allocation principles. The term “allocable costs” as used herein, applies to costs that are allowable for allocation. Internal Service allocations to the operating departments are not included in the total central service allocation column below and as such are not included in the indirect cost rates listed.

The study is comprised of two separate allocation plans. Table 1 is the summary results of the allocation in compliance with the Office of Management and Budget Super Circular (the OMB Super Circular) and CFR Part 200 (Cost Principles). Table 2 that follows is the summary results of the full plan. The report below includes descriptions of the differences between the two plans, their separate purposes, and specific details of when the plans deviate from each other.

Page 82 of 282 ends

3 Cost Allocation Plan

Table 1: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments (OMB Compliant CAP)

Allocated Cost SummaryFiscal Year 2024-2025Direct Cost BaseOperating Department / Division / Fund Total AllocationModified Total Direct CostIndirect Cost Rate$12,365,568 $93,094,918 13%GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $293,468 $2,852,789 10%GF- FIRE $3,066,575 $16,388,328 19%GF- LIBRARY $494,970 $2,843,243 17%GF- POLICE $4,729,949 $25,565,675 19%GF- PUBLIC WORKS $488,802 $2,766,323 18%GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES $554,832 $2,525,107 22%GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS $2,926 $81,000 4%201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND $65,120 $1,000,000 7%203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT $784 $24,500 3%205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND $21,667 $131,392 16%216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND $12,832 $401,191 3%219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 $3,083 $73,950 4%220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 $57,873 $937,268 6%231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS $36,271 $56,000 65%232: Measure A $16,250 $0237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT $17,063 $0238: 0PA PROPOSITION A $166,976 $2,778,203 6%239: MEASURE R FUND $76,856 $778,944 10%240: MEASURE M FUND $420 $11,628 4%241: PROPOSITION C $50,293 $1,404,449 4%242: STATE GAS TAX FUND $117,089 $1,502,318 8%247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND $2,414 $58,905 4%248: MEASURE W FUND $26,531 $233,162 11%282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT $5,375 $116,619 5%301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE $189 $5,905 3%302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY $6,323 $61,000 10%303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT $2,774 $8,348 33%304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC $642 $6,600 10%306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT $832 $26,000 3%307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE $1,784 $8,828 20%308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS $0 $0310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 $1,594 $49,848 3%313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE $16,254 $192,926 8%314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT $26,211 $260,000 10%315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE $46,883 $644,000 7%321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT $1,311 $35,000 4%323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT $16,714 $25,000 67%325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER $2,879 $90,000 3%332: COMM DEV GRANT $1,218 $27,600 4%334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 $38,964 $24,743 157%335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM $36,371 $8,588 424%351: WIOA GRANT $2,227 $10,018 22%353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT $7,988 $25,714 31%361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM $12,094 $280,143 4%362: CDBG FUND $17,488 $379,554 5%363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN $85,845 $859,753 10%367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA $23,711 $392,780 6%368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT $37,582 $1,175,039 3%373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING $6,141 $30,170 20%383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG $2,452 $43,765 6%401: WATER FUND $853,096 $13,093,624 7%402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND $215,908 $4,860,895 4%411: SEWER FUND $177,694 $3,206,284 6%421: REFUSE FUND $106,052 $1,209,737 9%501: CITY SHOP FUND $275,044 $3,282,319 8%601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND $18,402 $0621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD $0 $0841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA $7,998 $112,022 7%842: MERGED SA $6,486 $127,720 5%

Page 83 of 282 ends

4 Cost Allocation Plan

Table 2: Allocated Costs to Recipient Departments (Full CAP)

Allocated Cost SummaryFiscal Year 2024-2025Direct Cost BaseOperating Department / Division / Fund Total AllocationModified Total Direct CostIndirect Cost Rate$13,526,488 $93,094,918 15%GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $325,634 $2,852,789 11%GF- FIRE $3,318,814 $16,388,328 20%GF- LIBRARY $545,872 $2,843,243 19%GF- POLICE $5,114,116 $25,565,675 20%GF- PUBLIC WORKS $542,292 $2,766,323 20%GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES $614,470 $2,525,107 24%GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS $3,118 $81,000 4%201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND $80,177 $1,000,000 8%203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT $836 $24,500 3%205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND $24,611 $131,392 19%216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND $13,695 $401,191 3%219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 $3,281 $73,950 4%220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 $63,531 $937,268 7%231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS $41,690 $56,000 74%232: Measure A $18,845 $0237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT $19,703 $0238: 0PA PROPOSITION A $188,511 $2,778,203 7%239: MEASURE R FUND $85,631 $778,944 11%240: MEASURE M FUND $447 $11,628 4%241: PROPOSITION C $54,584 $1,404,449 4%242: STATE GAS TAX FUND $132,417 $1,502,318 9%247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND $2,747 $58,905 5%248: MEASURE W FUND $30,016 $233,162 13%282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT $5,716 $116,619 5%301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE $202 $5,905 3%302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY $6,692 $61,000 11%303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT $2,927 $8,348 35%304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC $679 $6,600 10%306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT $888 $26,000 3%307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE $1,885 $8,828 21%308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS $0 $0310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 $1,702 $49,848 3%313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE $17,216 $192,926 9%314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT $29,455 $260,000 11%315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE $51,408 $644,000 8%321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT $1,396 $35,000 4%323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT $19,346 $25,000 77%325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER $3,072 $90,000 3%332: COMM DEV GRANT $1,295 $27,600 5%334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 $44,516 $24,743 180%335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM $41,776 $8,588 486%351: WIOA GRANT $2,440 $10,018 24%353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT $8,564 $25,714 33%361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM $13,196 $280,143 5%362: CDBG FUND $19,050 $379,554 5%363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN $102,038 $859,753 12%367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA $28,802 $392,780 7%368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT $40,111 $1,175,039 3%373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING $6,486 $30,170 21%383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG $2,604 $43,765 6%401: WATER FUND $949,004 $13,093,624 7%402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND $235,404 $4,860,895 5%411: SEWER FUND $201,084 $3,206,284 6%421: REFUSE FUND $121,417 $1,209,737 10%501: CITY SHOP FUND $302,908 $3,282,319 9%601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND $21,115 $0621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD $0 $0841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA $9,378 $112,022 8%842: MERGED SA $7,680 $127,720 6%

Page 84 of 282 ends

5 Cost Allocation Plan

Introduction
In the early 1970s, the cost allocation plan concept was introduced to many government agencies. The purpose of a typical cost allocation plan is to identify costs related to rendering internal central support services and allocate those costs to operating departments or programs that utilize and benefit from them, in a fair and equitable manner.

Before indirect costs and central support service charges may be claimed for reimbursement by an operating department, there must be some formal means of identifying, accumulating and distributing these types of costs to all benefiting departments. Regardless of whether an agency has a formal comprehensive cost accounting system, the best method of accumulating, identifying, and determining a distribution of indirect costs is a cost allocation plan.

A City is made up of many departments, each with their own specific purposes or functions. Departments whose primary function is to provide support internally to other City departments are called central services.

Examples of central services are City Manager, Finance, Human Resources, and City Council. Within these groups there are numerous functions performed that provide support to the direct cost centers. The direct cost centers, or departments and funds, that require support from Central Services and provide services directly to the community through their day-to-day operations, are called operating departments. Examples of operating departments are Police, Public Works, Community Development, and Recreation and Community Services. The cost allocation plan allocates the costs of the central services to the operating departments based on the nature of the functions of each central service, upon which the operating departments depend. This is done to determine the total cost associated with providing direct services. The overall goal of the cost allocation plan process is to allow cities to allocate a portion of the central service costs to the operating departments, thus 1) accounting for “all” costs, direct and indirect, for each operating department, and 2) facilitating the calculation of a fully burdened cost estimate of providing services to the public.

The purpose of this study is to:
 Identify the central support and operating departments in the City;  Identify the functions and services provided by the central departments;  Identify allocable and non-allocable costs associated with the City’s central service departments; and
 Distribute those costs to operating entities in a fair and equitable manner.

Page 85 of 282 ends

6 Cost Allocation Plan

Approach
Methodology
The way in which each Indirect Service provides support to the operating departments is determined in order to perform allocations in a manner consistent with the nature of that Indirect Service. This ensures that the costs can be allocated to each operating department in a fair and equitable way. The cost allocation plan identifies the functions of each central service department, and then determines a methodology to allocate or spread the central service costs in a manner that best represents the nature of those functions.

The mathematical representations of central service functions used to allocate indirect costs are commonly called distribution bases. A distribution basis is a set of data displayed as the level of measure of each department’s participation in a specific activity or City function. This basis is then used to distribute costs that reasonably relate to the activity or City function that the basis represents. Some examples of distribution bases are salary and benefits costs, number of full-time equivalent employees, frequencies of City council agenda items, and number of processed transactions. The data sets associated with these distribution bases for each department are collected to facilitate the allocation of indirect costs.

The methodology used for this cost allocation plan is the iterative method, which is one of the most equitable methods for allocating costs from central services to operating departments. While not used as prevalently as simpler allocation methods, it is widely considered to be the most accurate. The iterative method utilizes a recursive application of central service cost distribution to allocate indirect costs. In the first step, the allocable costs of central service departments are identified and distributed to all departments including the central service departments themselves, based on the appropriate allocation bases that were selected to represent the manner in which central services are utilized. This is repeated ad infinitum until all costs have been distributed to the operating departments, and none remain with the central service departments.

As an example, consider the allocation of central service costs associated with the Human Resources Department. The function of Human Resources is identified, and the appropriate distribution basis is determined to be the total full time equivalent personnel and salaries and benefits per department and fund. The allowable costs are then distributed to all City departments and funds based on their proportional share of full time equivalent personnel and salaries and benefits, including other central services. The costs allocated from central service to central service in the initial allocation are then allocated out using the same distribution methodology. This function is performed as many times as necessary until all costs for Human Resources have been allocated.

All central service departments are treated equally. That is to say, this method is performed concurrently for the allowable costs in each of the central service departments for each iteration until all costs associated with the central service departments have been allocated to each direct service department. The method is complete when the total amount of allocable costs remaining in the central service departments is equal to zero.

Page 86 of 282 ends

7 Cost Allocation Plan

Applications
Public agencies use cost allocation plans for many purposes such as internal accounting, the justification of user fees, application for reimbursement from federal programs or the determination of administrative effort associated with special districts and/or municipal service activities. In many of these cases, the agency will be required to certify that the costs identified are “reasonable”. Per the Code of Federal Regulations, a cost is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was made to incur the cost. The question of reasonableness is particularly important when determining the amount that a public agency should be reimbursed for central service overhead activities associated with a federally funded program. Additionally, public agencies should consider special care to only identify the portion of central service costs that have not been reimbursed through other means (such as grants, user fee revenues, transfers from other departments or internal service funds) to avoid double-counting. These cost reductions are done before the allocation methodologies are used and are detailed within the model itself.

OMB Super Circular and 2 CFR Part 200
This report details the allocations for two separate cost allocation plans. The primary model, presented in text and tables in the below sections and in Appendix A, provides a plan that complies with the Office of Management and Budget Super Circular (the OMB Super Circular) and CFR Part 200 (Cost Principles) that are used to determine central overhead costs incurred while carrying out activities associated with Federal awards, cost reimbursement contracts and some other intergovernmental agreements (as required). The secondary model presented in Appendix B of this report is the full cost allocation plan, which the City should use for standard City operations and budgeting. Unless otherwise indicated, the details of this report and Appendix A contain the OMB compliant allocation plan. The Appendix B tables contain the full cost plan and utilizes the same distribution methodology as the OMB Compliant plan. While the overall methodology used for both plans is the same, there are specific guidelines that require additional cost exemptions for OMB Super Circular compliance outside of what was done for the full cost plan. Where such exemptions are done in the methodology has been explained below. Some commonly encountered examples that are usually exempt under OMB Super Circular guidelines are:
 General Advertising
 Bad Debt
 Contingencies
 Litigation
 Debt Service
 Entertainment
 Capital
 Lobbying
 Legislative Body (City Council)
 Promotional Items

Page 87 of 282 ends

8 Cost Allocation Plan

Central Service Departments
Eleven (11) central service functions were identified for the purposes of this cost allocation plan:
 City Attorney
 City Clerk
 City Council
 City Manager
 City Treasurer
 Finance
 Human Resources
 Media Production
 Nondepartmental
 Revenue Collection
 Retirement

Page 88 of 282 ends

9 Cost Allocation Plan

Distribution Bases
Distribution bases are the allocation factors that may be used to distribute the allocable costs to all departments and funds. As discussed previously, distribution bases are measurable and readily available data that are utilized to represent activities or functions, and which are then used to distribute costs matching that activity or function. Below are the bases that were analyzed in this study and used to allocate Central Services costs to operating departments.  Number of FTE Employees – The number of full-time equivalent personnel for each department and fund.
 Modified Total Direct Cost – The total allowable expenditures budgeted for each department and fund for fiscal year 2025 which excludes capital and debt, and non-operational transfers.  City Council Agenda Frequency – City Council agendas spanning a 12-month period were used to determine the number of times each department and fund had matters brought before the City Council.
 Total Invoices – The total number of invoices processed for each department and fund for a year.  Total Purchase Orders– The total number of purchase orders processed for each department and fund for a year.
 Number of Recruitments– The total number of recruitments for each department and fund for a year.
 Total Retirement Expenses within Fund 202– The total retirement expenses expense within Fund 202.

Page 89 of 282 ends

10 Cost Allocation Plan

Allocable Costs and Distribution Bases
Allocable Costs
Table 3 identifies the allocable cost of each central service department for the OMB compliant allocation plan, with the total allocable costs for this study being $12,365,568. The total expenditures from the central service departments were $20,866,207. However, $8,500,640 of the expenditures identified as unallowable by the 200 CFR Part 200 and have been excluded from allocation for the OMB compliant plan. The primary exclusions were related to the City Council, Retiree Payouts, Lobbying, Election, City, California League of Cities membership, contingency, debt service, and capital outlay expenses. The remaining amount was distributed to the operating departments and the central services departments by distribution factor(s) that best represents the functions of each central service department and the demand placed on that central service by all City departments, as previously described in the Methodology section of this report. The allocation methodology for each central service is detailed in the following section of this report.

Table 3: Allocable Cost Summary

Allocable Cost Summary - Central Services Fiscal Year 2024-2025Total CostUnallocable CostAllocable CostSummary 20,866,207$ 8,500,640$ 12,365,568$ Central ServiceGF- CITY ATTORNEY 761,212 - 761,212 GF- CITY CLERK 909,999 276,500 633,499 GF- CITY COUNCIL 142,315 142,315 - GF- CITY MANAGER 1,060,991 55 1,060,936 GF- CITY TREASURER 18,885 6,250 12,635 GF- FINANCE 1,885,056 83,900 1,801,156 GF- HUMAN RESOURCES 638,480 1,300 637,180 GF- MEDIA PRODUCTION 407,344 600 406,744 GF- NONDEPARTMENTAL 1,171,548 650,000 521,548 GF- REVENUE COLLECTION 883,320 - 883,320 202: RETIREMENT 12,987,056 7,339,720 5,647,337

Page 90 of 282 ends

11 Cost Allocation Plan

Central Service Allocation Methodology
The first step of the iterative allocation method is to distribute the allocable costs of the central service departments to other central service departments and operating departments based on the distribution methodology and bases that best represent the activity of the central service, and the functions it serves.

The sections below describe each central service and the methodology used to allocate their costs.

Corresponding tables detailing each distribution are attached in the Appendices as tables A-1 through A-3 for the OMB compliant plan and B-1 for the full cost plan.

Section 1: City Attorney
The City Attorney acts as the City’s legal counsel. In this capacity, the City Attorney advises the City Council and Staff on legal matters relating to the operation of the municipal government and is responsible for the review and preparation of resolutions, ordinances, and agreements. The services of the City Attorney are provided via contractual services with a private legal firm.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Attorney, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total cost for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of City Council agendas for each department and fund.

Section 2: City Clerk
The Office of the City Clerk is responsible for keeping a complete and accurate record of City Council proceedings, maintaining official city records, providing public information and conducting municipal elections according to the stipulations of State and Federal laws. Specific service objectives are: • Ensure that legal requirements regarding public meetings, hearings, attestations and petitions are handled properly and according to applicable rules and laws. • Accurately record the proceedings and actions of the City Council for legal references, historic information, and continuity of government. • Keeping and maintaining safe, efficient storage of official city documents and records. • Ensure that municipal elections are consolidated and conducted by the County of Los Angeles Registrar Recorder’ office in an economical and error-free manner with maximum convenience to the voters, while complying with the Federal Voting GF- CITY ATTORNEYTotal FTE's33%Modified Total Direct Cost33%Total Agendas33%

Page 91 of 282 ends

12 Cost Allocation Plan

Rights Act. • Administer the provisions of the Political Reform Act so that all related reports are filed in a timely manner according to law. • Maintain accurate records of all City Commissioner terms of office and posting of vacancies in accordance with state regulations; accept applications for commissions and provide applications for City Council’s consideration.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Clerk, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total cost for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of City Council agendas for each department and fund.

Section 3: City Council
The City Council is responsible to the electorate for keeping pace with changing community needs, establishing quality municipal services, promoting confidence in local government through open conduct of public affairs, and encouraging constructive citizen participation. The City Council determines service levels and revenue obligations through the adoption of an annual budget, authorizes City contracts and expenditures, establishes municipal service goals and operating policies, and adopts regulatory measures necessary to establish community protection. The City Council also serves as the governing board of the Community Redevelopment Agency and represents the City on various intergovernmental organizations to achieve governmental cooperation, legislation, and programs that are consistent with the needs of Monterey Park's citizens.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Council, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total cost for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of City Council agendas for each department and fund.

GF- CITY CLERKTotal FTE's33%Modified Total Direct Cost33%Total Agendas33%

Page 92 of 282 ends

13 Cost Allocation Plan

 For the OMB plan the costs of City Council are not allocated to ensure OMB compliance.

Section 4: City Manager
The City Manager's Office provides overall citywide administrative direction in pursuit of goals and policies established by the City Council. The City Manager's Office also oversees the City Clerk, Communications, and the Homeless Solutions Program.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Manager’s Office, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total cost for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund.
 Thirty-three percent (33%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of City Council agendas for each department and fund.

Section 5: City Treasurer
The City Treasurer is an elected position and is responsible for overseeing the custody and investment of the City monies. Specific service objectives include: • Receive and safely keep the City Funds and schedule their availability to meet cash disbursement requirements. • Provide overall investment management and strategy in the order of safety, liquidity, and yield in order to safeguard public funds in accordance with the City’s investment policy and State laws. • Provide monthly and annual investment reporting to the City Council. • Update and submit the City’s investment policy reflecting current law changes to the City Council on an annual basis.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the City Treasurer, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.

GF- CITY COUNCILTotal FTE's33%Modified Total Direct Cost33%Total Agendas33% GF- CITY MANAGERTotal FTE's33%Modified Total Direct Cost33%Total Agendas33%

Page 93 of 282 ends

14 Cost Allocation Plan

 One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total cost for each department and fund.

Section 6: Finance
The Finance Division is responsible for the accounting operations of the City, which includes cash management, debt administration, accounts payable, accounts receivable, payroll, grant accounting, auditing, financial reporting, and the development and monitoring of the City Budget.

Finance prepares various financial reports to City Council, City management and departments for fiscal monitoring. Finance also publishes the City’s Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, Single Audit Report, Cost Allocation Plan, Investment Report, Midyear Financial Report, and Budget Manual, and prepares the citywide lighting and landscaping assessment district tax submittals.

Finance maintains the City’s financial records and prepares financial reports to various State and Federal agencies. Finance works with City Treasurer in monitoring the City’s cash flow and investing idle funds in accordance with the City’s investment policy.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the Finance Department, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 Fifty percent (50%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund.
 Twenty five percent (25%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total number of purchase orders processed for each department and fund.
 Twenty five percent (25%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total number of invoices processed for each department and fund.

Section 7: Human Resources
The Human Resources Division supports all departments by providing a wide range of personnel services, which are divided among the following separate, but integrated program areas:

GF- CITY TREASURERModified Total Direct Cost100%
GF- FINANCEModified Total Direct Cost50%Total Purchase Orders25%Total Invoices25%

Page 94 of 282 ends

15 Cost Allocation Plan

Employee Development: Training and development programs to enhance employees’ job skills and abilities as well as assist them in achieving career development goals. Supervisory training, tuition reimbursement for approved formal education, and in-house workshops are coordinated by and funded through the Human Resources Division. The department will continue to evaluate training needs and the required training needed to support the employee groups.

Employee Relations: An effective program of employer/employee relations has been built through the negotiation process and through administration of labor contracts with the City’s eight represented employee groups. This also includes employee and supervisory counseling on personnel policies, procedures, and best practices, providing assistance in handling employee grievances and disciplinary actions, negotiation and implementation of new labor contract provisions, communication meetings with labor representatives, and promoting new programs to enhance the quality, efficiency and responsiveness of municipal services.

Recruitment and Selection: Recruitment and selection activities include job analyses, advertising, focused outreach efforts, testing administration, pre-employment medical examinations, comprehensive background checks, including Live Scan fingerprinting, reference checks and other testing as needed. This section also ensures that recruitment efforts are in compliance with adopted merit system requirements and related employment laws.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the costs of Human Resources Division, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 Fifty percent (50%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the number of full-time equivalents for each department and fund.
 Fifty percent (50%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of salaries and benefits for each department and fund.

Section 8: Media Production
The Media Production Division coordinates the City’s Cable Television, general and community-based programming, and original productions. Additionally, the division also oversees the City’s website and social media accounts. The Division also coordinates and assists the City Contractor with the publication of the Monterey Park Cascades newspaper.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the Media Production Division, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.

GF- HUMAN RESOURCESTotal FTE's50%Total Salaries and Benefits50%

Page 95 of 282 ends

16 Cost Allocation Plan

 One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund.

Section 9: Nondepartmental
The Non-Departmental function accounts for costs that are not generally associated with a specific department. These programs include General Liability, Post Employment, and Workers’ Compensation.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the costs of Non-Departmental, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund.

Section 10: Revenue Collection
Revenue Collection provides for a range of revenue-related services, including preparing the Master Schedule of Fees and Charges, accounts receivable, cashiering services for all departments, the billing and collection of utility charges, the managing of license applications for new businesses, utility applications for water and refuse services, the processing of special permits, and the collection of delinquent accounts.

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the functions of the Revenue Collection, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the amount of modified total direct cost for each department and fund.

Section 11: Retirement
Cost of utilities to service city buildings (such as natural gas, electricity, and water).

GF- MEDIA PRODUCTIONModified Total Direct Cost100%GF- NONDEPARTMENTALTotal Salaries and Benefits100%GF- REVENUE COLLECTIONModified Total Direct Cost100%

Page 96 of 282 ends

17 Cost Allocation Plan

Allocation Method
Based on the assessment of the costs of Utilities for City Facilities, it is reasonable to distribute the allocable cost by using the method(s) described below.
 One hundred percent (100%) of the allocable cost was allocated based on the total retirement expenses within Fund 202.

202: RETIREMENTRetirement Expenses within Fund 202100%

Page 97 of 282 ends

18 Cost Allocation Plan

Iterative Allocation
The total allocable expenditures of each central service department were allocated to other departments (including both operating departments and other central service departments) based on the individual methodologies outlined above in Sections 1 through 11 of the Allocation Percentages chapter. Any cost allocated from central service to central service is then reallocated using the same methodology. This operation is done iteratively until all allocable costs are received by the operating departments and funds, and none remain with the central services. After completion of the iterative allocation method, a total combined allocable cost of $12,365,568 was distributed to all departments and funds until the allocable cost remained only in the operating departments and funds, and the amount of allocable costs remaining in central service departments was equal to zero.

The full cost plan follows the same methodology with the exception that all costs that were excluded solely for OMB compliance, but were reasonable for the full plan, were made allowable and included in the allocation. See Table B-1 for additional details for the full cost plan.

After implementing the iterative allocation methodology, all allocable central service costs have been distributed to the operating departments and funds. Table 1 in the Executive Summary of this report summarized the distribution of the total allocable cost of $12,365,568 to each recipient department for the OMB compliant CAP. Table 2 summarized the distribution of the total allocable cost of $13,526,488 to each recipient department for the full cost CAP.

Page 98 of 282 ends

19 Cost Allocation Plan

Appendix A
Appendix A lists the tables detailing the allocation methodology performed in allocating central service costs for the OMB compliant cost allocation plan.

Page 99 of 282 ends

20 Cost Allocation Plan

Table A-1a: Initial Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP)

First IterationCentral Service/Operating Departments GF- CITY ATTORNEY GF- CITY CLERK GF- CITY COUNCIL GF- CITY MANAGER GF- CITY TREASURER GF- FINANCE GF- CITY ATTORNEY 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.4%GF- CITY CLERK 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.9% 0.9%GF- CITY COUNCIL 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2%GF- CITY MANAGER 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 1.0% 0.7%GF- CITY TREASURER 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%GF- FINANCE 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 1.8% 1.7%GF- HUMAN RESOURCES 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.9%GF- MEDIA PRODUCTION 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0.5%GF- NONDEPARTMENTAL 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.1% 0.6%GF- REVENUE COLLECTION 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 1.0%GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8%GF- FIRE 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 15.4% 14.2%GF- LIBRARY 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 2.7% 3.9%GF- POLICE 20.9% 20.9% 20.9% 20.9% 24.0% 18.1%GF- PUBLIC WORKS 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 7.3% 2.6% 6.0%GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 7.4% 2.4% 4.1%GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.9% 0.5%203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.1% 0.1%216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.9% 1.5%231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.1% 0.2%232: Measure A 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1%238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.6% 1.7%239: MEASURE R FUND 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 1.7%240: MEASURE M FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%241: PROPOSITION C 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.3% 0.8%242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.4% 1.7%247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%248: MEASURE W FUND 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2%282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2%303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.6%314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2%315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.8%321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%332: COMM DEV GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.0% 0.3%335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.0% 0.2%351: WIOA GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2%362: CDBG FUND 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.4%363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 1.1%367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.1% 0.6%373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%401: WATER FUND 10.6% 10.6% 10.6% 10.6% 12.3% 14.0%402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 4.6% 3.6%411: SEWER FUND 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 3.0% 2.2%421: REFUSE FUND 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 1.1% 0.9%501: CITY SHOP FUND 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 3.1% 6.3%601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1%621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%842: MERGED SA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Central Service Departments

Page 100 of 282 ends

21 Cost Allocation Plan

Table A-1b: Initial Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) – continued

First IterationCentral Service/Operating Departments GF- HUMAN RESOURCES GF- MEDIA PRODUCTION GF- NONDEPARTMENTAL GF- REVENUE COLLECTION 202: RETIREMENT GF- CITY ATTORNEY 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%GF- CITY CLERK 0.8% 0.9% 0.7% 0.9% 0.5%GF- CITY COUNCIL 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%GF- CITY MANAGER 1.2% 1.0% 1.4% 1.0% 1.5%GF- CITY TREASURER 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%GF- FINANCE 2.3% 1.8% 2.0% 1.8% 1.9%GF- HUMAN RESOURCES 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.6% 0.3%GF- MEDIA PRODUCTION 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0%GF- NONDEPARTMENTAL 0.6% 1.1% 1.2% 1.1% 13.3%GF- REVENUE COLLECTION 1.4% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.4%GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2.4% 2.7% 2.7% 2.7% 1.7%GF- FIRE 18.0% 15.4% 21.9% 15.4% 29.1%GF- LIBRARY 5.7% 2.7% 3.7% 2.7% 2.8%GF- POLICE 33.4% 24.0% 33.2% 24.0% 45.4%GF- PUBLIC WORKS 3.6% 2.6% 1.8% 2.6% 1.2%GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 11.4% 2.4% 2.8% 2.4% 1.8%GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 1.0% 0.9% 1.9% 0.9% 0.0%203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 0.2% 0.9% 0.4% 0.9% 0.0%231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%232: Measure A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 1.3% 2.6% 1.2% 2.6% 0.0%239: MEASURE R FUND 0.2% 0.7% 0.4% 0.7% 0.0%240: MEASURE M FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%241: PROPOSITION C 0.1% 1.3% 0.2% 1.3% 0.0%242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 0.5% 1.4% 0.8% 1.4% 0.0%247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%248: MEASURE W FUND 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%332: COMM DEV GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%351: WIOA GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%362: CDBG FUND 0.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0%363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 0.8% 0.8% 1.6% 0.8% 0.0%367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 0.3% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.0%368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0%373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%401: WATER FUND 4.2% 12.3% 4.4% 12.3% 0.0%402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 0.6% 4.6% 0.6% 4.6% 0.0%411: SEWER FUND 1.5% 3.0% 1.7% 3.0% 0.0%421: REFUSE FUND 0.3% 1.1% 0.7% 1.1% 0.0%501: CITY SHOP FUND 1.3% 3.1% 1.2% 3.1% 0.0%601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%842: MERGED SA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Central Service Departments

Page 101 of 282 ends

22 Cost Allocation Plan

Table A-2a: Final Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP)

Central Service/Operating Departments GF- CITY ATTORNEY GF- CITY CLERK GF- CITY COUNCIL GF- CITY MANAGER GF- CITY TREASURER GF- FINANCE GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 3.0% 2.0%GF- FIRE 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 18.5% 16.4%GF- LIBRARY 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 4.4% 3.2% 4.4%GF- POLICE 23.6% 23.6% 23.6% 23.6% 28.8% 21.4%GF- PUBLIC WORKS 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 7.7% 3.1% 6.4%GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 7.9% 7.9% 7.9% 7.9% 2.9% 4.6%GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.0% 0.5%203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.1% 0.2%216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.9% 1.5%231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.1% 0.2%232: Measure A 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1%238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.8% 1.9%239: MEASURE R FUND 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 1.8%240: MEASURE M FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%241: PROPOSITION C 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 1.4% 0.8%242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 1.5% 1.8%247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%248: MEASURE W FUND 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.2% 0.2%282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2%303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.6%314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.3% 0.2%315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.8%321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%332: COMM DEV GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.1% 0.4%335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 0.0% 0.2%351: WIOA GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2%362: CDBG FUND 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.4%363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 1.2%367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2%368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 1.1% 0.6%373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3%383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%401: WATER FUND 11.5% 11.5% 11.5% 11.5% 13.2% 14.8%402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 4.8% 3.8%411: SEWER FUND 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 3.2% 2.4%421: REFUSE FUND 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 1.2% 1.0%501: CITY SHOP FUND 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 3.4% 6.6%601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1%621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%842: MERGED SA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% Central Service Departments

Page 102 of 282 ends

23 Cost Allocation Plan

Table A-2b: Final Allocation Percentages (OMB Compliant CAP) – continued

Central Service/Operating Departments GF- HUMAN RESOURCES GF- MEDIA PRODUCTION GF- NONDEPARTMENTAL GF- REVENUE COLLECTION 202: RETIREMENT GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2.7% 3.0% 3.1% 3.0% 2.2%GF- FIRE 21.1% 18.5% 26.8% 18.5% 33.4%GF- LIBRARY 6.3% 3.2% 4.4% 3.2% 3.6%GF- POLICE 38.2% 28.8% 40.8% 28.8% 51.9%GF- PUBLIC WORKS 4.1% 3.1% 2.4% 3.1% 1.9%GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 11.9% 2.9% 3.4% 2.9% 2.6%GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 1.0% 1.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.3%203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 0.3% 0.9% 0.4% 0.9% 0.1%231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%232: Measure A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 1.4% 2.8% 1.3% 2.8% 0.3%239: MEASURE R FUND 0.3% 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% 0.1%240: MEASURE M FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%241: PROPOSITION C 0.1% 1.4% 0.2% 1.4% 0.1%242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 0.6% 1.5% 1.0% 1.5% 0.2%247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%248: MEASURE W FUND 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 0.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%332: COMM DEV GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%351: WIOA GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%362: CDBG FUND 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0%363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 0.9% 0.9% 1.7% 0.9% 0.3%367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 0.3% 0.4% 0.7% 0.4% 0.1%368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0%373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%401: WATER FUND 5.2% 13.2% 5.3% 13.2% 1.3%402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 0.8% 4.8% 0.8% 4.8% 0.3%411: SEWER FUND 1.7% 3.2% 1.9% 3.2% 0.4%421: REFUSE FUND 0.5% 1.2% 0.8% 1.2% 0.2%501: CITY SHOP FUND 1.6% 3.4% 1.5% 3.4% 0.4%601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0%842: MERGED SA 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Central Service Departments

Page 103 of 282 ends

24 Cost Allocation Plan

Table A-3a: Final Allocation Amounts (OMB Compliant CAP)

Department GF- CITY ATTORNEY GF- CITY CLERK GF- CITY COUNCIL GF- CITY MANAGER GF- CITY TREASURER GF- FINANCE 761,212633,49901,060,93612,6351,801,156GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 18,227 15,169 - 25,404 377 36,898 GF- FIRE 114,554 95,334 - 159,659 2,335 295,275 GF- LIBRARY 33,644 27,999 - 46,891 402 78,369 GF- POLICE 179,608 149,474 - 250,327 3,636 386,229 GF- PUBLIC WORKS 58,671 48,827 - 81,772 392 115,756 GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 59,945 49,888 - 83,548 372 83,433 GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 217 180 - 302 10 1,025 201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 2,772 2,307 - 3,864 128 9,550 203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 64 54 - 90 3 221 205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 4,838 4,027 - 6,744 18 2,840 216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 1,056 879 - 1,472 49 3,621 219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 202 168 - 282 9 1,297 220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 2,714 2,258 - 3,782 119 27,470 231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 9,128 7,597 - 12,722 12 3,418 232: Measure A 4,480 3,729 - 6,244 2 587 237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 4,488 3,735 - 6,256 2 1,301 238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 20,044 16,681 - 27,936 352 33,892 239: MEASURE R FUND 6,849 5,700 - 9,546 102 32,344 240: MEASURE M FUND 31 26 - 43 1 147 241: PROPOSITION C 3,734 3,108 - 5,205 173 14,879 242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 13,474 11,214 - 18,780 194 33,185 247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 157 131 - 219 7 540 248: MEASURE W FUND 5,509 4,585 - 7,678 31 3,195 282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 324 269 - 451 14 2,497 301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 16 13 - 22 1 53 302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 205 171 - 286 8 4,388 303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 48 40 - 66 1 2,276 304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 22 18 - 30 1 437 306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 68 57 - 95 3 235 307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 39 32 - 54 1 1,398 308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS - - - - - - 310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 131 109 - 183 6 450 313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 611 508 - 851 25 10,592 314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 5,181 4,312 - 7,222 34 4,378 315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 6,278 5,224 - 8,750 82 15,208 321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 94 78 - 131 4 484 323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 4,543 3,780 - 6,331 5 519 325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 237 197 - 330 11 812 332: COMM DEV GRANT 76 63 - 106 3 543 334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 9,083 7,559 - 12,660 8 6,378 335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 9,020 7,506 - 12,571 6 4,409 351: WIOA GRANT 44 37 - 62 1 1,539 353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 138 115 - 193 4 6,184 361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 764 635 - 1,064 35 4,433 362: CDBG FUND 1,046 870 - 1,457 47 6,949 363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 7,004 5,829 - 9,762 114 20,962 367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 1,083 901 - 1,509 50 3,969 368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 3,093 2,574 - 4,311 144 10,604 373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 132 110 - 184 4 4,815 383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 126 105 - 176 5 1,319 401: WATER FUND 87,404 72,740 - 121,819 1,664 266,567 402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 19,026 15,834 - 26,518 604 68,023 411: SEWER FUND 16,538 13,763 - 23,050 404 42,430 421: REFUSE FUND 16,744 13,935 - 23,337 158 18,821 501: CITY SHOP FUND 22,188 18,465 - 30,924 425 118,887 601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 4,502 3,747 - 6,275 3 2,477 621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD - - - - - - 841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 653 544 - 910 14 1,415 842: MERGED SA 347 288 - 483 16 1,232 Central Service Departments

Page 104 of 282 ends

25 Cost Allocation Plan

Table A-3b: Final Allocation Amounts (OMB Compliant CAP) – continued

Department GF- HUMAN RESOURCES GF- MEDIA PRODUCTION GF- NONDEPARTMENTAL GF- REVENUE COLLECTION 202: RETIREMENT Total Allocation 637,180406,744521,548883,3205,647,33712,365,568GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 17,429 12,125 16,190 26,332 125,318 293,468 GF- FIRE 134,600 75,180 139,541 163,267 1,886,831 3,066,575 GF- LIBRARY 39,841 12,929 22,819 28,078 203,999 494,970 GF- POLICE 243,536 117,039 212,531 254,171 2,933,399 4,729,949 GF- PUBLIC WORKS 26,327 12,622 12,475 27,411 104,549 488,802 GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 75,927 11,977 17,981 26,010 145,751 554,832 GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 23 321 16 697 135 2,926 201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 6,549 4,121 10,434 8,949 16,447 65,120 203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 6 97 4 210 35 784 205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 132 595 112 1,292 1,069 21,667 216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 99 1,583 70 3,437 566 12,832 219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 24 295 17 640 149 3,083 220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 1,611 3,818 2,261 8,291 5,548 57,873 231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 209 373 185 809 1,818 36,271 232: Measure A 90 72 81 156 808 16,250 237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 96 75 86 163 858 17,063 238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 9,237 11,318 6,994 24,578 15,946 166,976 239: MEASURE R FUND 1,963 3,298 2,760 7,163 7,131 76,856 240: MEASURE M FUND 3 46 2 100 19 420 241: PROPOSITION C 921 5,566 1,161 12,088 3,459 50,293 242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 3,814 6,236 5,019 13,543 11,631 117,089 247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 115 235 174 511 324 2,414 248: MEASURE W FUND 719 1,004 230 2,180 1,400 26,531 282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 42 467 30 1,013 267 5,375 301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 1 23 1 51 8 189 302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 50 258 37 561 359 6,323 303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 22 43 17 93 168 2,774 304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 5 28 4 60 36 642 306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 6 103 5 223 37 832 307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 14 41 11 89 106 1,784 308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS - - - - - - 310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 12 197 9 427 70 1,594 313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 128 802 95 1,741 901 16,254 314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 167 1,104 137 2,398 1,277 26,211 315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 329 2,653 255 5,761 2,343 46,883 321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 10 139 7 302 61 1,311 323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 93 169 84 367 822 16,714 325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 22 355 16 771 127 2,879 332: COMM DEV GRANT 9 110 7 239 60 1,218 334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 231 264 202 574 2,004 38,964 335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 211 192 186 417 1,852 36,371 351: WIOA GRANT 65 48 93 103 235 2,227 353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 135 131 168 284 637 7,988 361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 273 1,119 366 2,430 975 12,094 362: CDBG FUND 384 1,521 511 3,302 1,401 17,488 363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 5,782 3,669 9,058 7,968 15,697 85,845 367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 2,165 1,608 3,433 3,493 5,501 23,711 368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 290 4,636 204 10,067 1,659 37,582 373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 49 140 37 304 365 6,141 383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 19 177 14 384 127 2,452 401: WATER FUND 32,964 53,570 27,623 116,338 72,407 853,096 402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 5,321 19,442 4,429 42,221 14,490 215,908 411: SEWER FUND 10,630 12,999 9,687 28,229 19,965 177,694 421: REFUSE FUND 2,872 5,078 4,158 11,028 9,921 106,052 501: CITY SHOP FUND 10,110 13,677 7,916 29,702 22,749 275,044 601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 107 81 95 175 942 18,402 621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD - - - - - - 841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 907 463 758 1,006 1,326 7,998 842: MERGED SA 480 517 751 1,122 1,251 6,486 Central Service Departments

Page 105 of 282 ends

26 Cost Allocation Plan

Appendix B
Appendix B provides the table detailing the allocation performed in allocating central service costs for the full cost allocation plan. The methodology for the full plan is the same as for the OMB compliant plan, as it is reasonable and represents how indirect support is provided in the City. The difference between the two plans, as has been described in this report, is in the costs that can be allocated.

Page 106 of 282 ends

27 Cost Allocation Plan

Table B-1a: Final Allocation Amounts (Full CAP)

Department GF- CITY ATTORNEY GF- CITY CLERK GF- CITY COUNCIL GF- CITY MANAGER GF- CITY TREASURER GF- FINANCE 761,212909,999142,3151,060,99118,8851,885,056GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 18,227 21,790 3,408 25,405 563 38,616 GF- FIRE 114,554 136,944 21,417 159,667 3,491 309,030 GF- LIBRARY 33,644 40,220 6,290 46,893 600 82,020 GF- POLICE 179,608 214,714 33,579 250,340 5,434 404,220 GF- PUBLIC WORKS 58,671 70,139 10,969 81,776 586 121,148 GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 59,945 71,662 11,207 83,552 556 87,319 GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 217 259 41 302 15 1,073 201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 2,772 3,314 518 3,864 191 9,995 203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 64 77 12 90 4 231 205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 4,838 5,784 905 6,744 28 2,972 216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 1,056 1,262 197 1,472 73 3,789 219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 202 241 38 282 14 1,358 220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 2,714 3,244 507 3,782 177 28,750 231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 9,128 10,912 1,707 12,723 17 3,578 232: Measure A 4,480 5,356 838 6,245 3 615 237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 4,488 5,366 839 6,256 3 1,362 238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 20,044 23,961 3,747 27,937 525 35,471 239: MEASURE R FUND 6,849 8,188 1,280 9,546 153 33,851 240: MEASURE M FUND 31 37 6 43 2 154 241: PROPOSITION C 3,734 4,464 698 5,205 258 15,572 242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 13,474 16,108 2,519 18,781 290 34,731 247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 157 188 29 219 11 565 248: MEASURE W FUND 5,509 6,586 1,030 7,678 47 3,344 282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 324 387 61 451 22 2,613 301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 16 19 3 22 1 56 302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 205 245 38 286 12 4,593 303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 48 57 9 66 2 2,382 304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 22 26 4 30 1 458 306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 68 82 13 95 5 246 307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 39 46 7 54 2 1,463 308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS - - - - - - 310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 131 157 25 183 9 471 313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 611 730 114 851 37 11,085 314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 5,181 6,194 969 7,222 51 4,582 315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 6,278 7,505 1,174 8,750 123 15,916 321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 94 112 18 131 6 506 323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 4,543 5,430 849 6,332 8 543 325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 237 283 44 330 16 850 332: COMM DEV GRANT 76 91 14 106 5 568 334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 9,083 10,859 1,698 12,661 12 6,675 335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 9,020 10,783 1,686 12,572 9 4,615 351: WIOA GRANT 44 53 8 62 2 1,611 353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 138 165 26 193 6 6,472 361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 764 913 143 1,064 52 4,640 362: CDBG FUND 1,046 1,250 195 1,457 71 7,273 363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 7,004 8,373 1,309 9,762 170 21,939 367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 1,083 1,294 202 1,509 75 4,154 368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 3,093 3,698 578 4,311 215 11,098 373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 132 158 25 184 6 5,040 383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 126 151 24 176 8 1,380 401: WATER FUND 87,404 104,488 16,341 121,825 2,487 278,984 402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 19,026 22,745 3,557 26,519 903 71,192 411: SEWER FUND 16,538 19,771 3,092 23,051 604 44,406 421: REFUSE FUND 16,744 20,017 3,130 23,338 236 19,698 501: CITY SHOP FUND 22,188 26,525 4,148 30,926 635 124,425 601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 4,502 5,382 842 6,275 4 2,592 621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD - - - - - - 841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 653 781 122 910 22 1,481 842: MERGED SA 347 414 65 483 24 1,289 Central Service Departments

Page 107 of 282 ends

28 Cost Allocation Plan

Table B-1b: Final Allocation Amounts (Full CAP) - continued

Department GF- HUMAN RESOURCES GF- MEDIA PRODUCTION GF- NONDEPARTMENTAL GF- REVENUE COLLECTION 202: RETIREMENT Total Allocation 638,480407,3441,171,548883,3205,647,33713,526,488GF- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 17,464 12,143 36,368 26,332 125,318 325,634 GF- FIRE 134,875 75,291 313,449 163,267 1,886,831 3,318,814 GF- LIBRARY 39,922 12,948 51,257 28,078 203,999 545,872 GF- POLICE 244,033 117,211 477,407 254,171 2,933,399 5,114,116 GF- PUBLIC WORKS 26,381 12,640 28,022 27,411 104,549 542,292 GF- RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES 76,082 11,995 40,391 26,010 145,751 614,470 GF- REGIONAL ASSOCIATIONS 23 321 36 697 135 3,118 201: PUBLIC SAFETY AUGMENT FUND 6,562 4,127 23,438 8,949 16,447 80,177 203: NATIONAL OPIOIDS SETTLEMENT 6 97 10 210 35 836 205: LAW ENFORCEMENT_FIRE DIF FUND 132 596 251 1,292 1,069 24,611 216: CERCLA LIABILITY FUND 99 1,585 156 3,437 566 13,695 219: BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA 1 24 295 39 640 149 3,281 220: MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 93_1 1,614 3,824 5,079 8,291 5,548 63,531 231: PARKS_LIBRARY_PUBLIC N AQUTICS 210 373 415 809 1,818 41,690 232: Measure A 90 72 183 156 808 18,845 237: ROAD MAINT N REHAB ACCOUNT 97 75 194 163 858 19,703 238: 0PA PROPOSITION A 9,256 11,334 15,711 24,578 15,946 188,511 239: MEASURE R FUND 1,967 3,303 6,201 7,163 7,131 85,631 240: MEASURE M FUND 3 46 5 100 19 447 241: PROPOSITION C 923 5,574 2,609 12,088 3,459 54,584 242: STATE GAS TAX FUND 3,822 6,245 11,274 13,543 11,631 132,417 247: AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT FUND 116 236 392 511 324 2,747 248: MEASURE W FUND 720 1,005 516 2,180 1,400 30,016 282: SB1383 LOCAL ASSISTANCE GRANT 42 467 68 1,013 267 5,716 301: ASSET FORFEITURE_JUSTICE 1 23 2 51 8 202 302: ASSET FORFEITURE_TREASURY 50 259 84 561 359 6,692 303: BULLETPROOF VEST POLICE GRANT 22 43 38 93 168 2,927 304: STC STANDARDS_TRAINING_CORREC 5 28 9 60 36 679 306: AB109 TASK FORCE GRANT 6 103 10 223 37 888 307: ASSET FORFEITURE_STATE 14 41 24 89 106 1,885 308: STATE LAW ENFORCE SVC_COPS - - - - - - 310: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_6 12 197 19 427 70 1,702 313: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 128 803 214 1,741 901 17,216 314: HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 168 1,106 307 2,398 1,277 29,455 315: URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 330 2,657 572 5,761 2,343 51,408 321: GROUND EMERG MEDICAL TRANSPORT 10 139 16 302 61 1,396 323: CALOES HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT 94 169 188 367 822 19,346 325: 2018 ASSISTANCE TO FIREFIGHTER 22 356 35 771 127 3,072 332: COMM DEV GRANT 10 110 15 239 60 1,295 334: SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCE_8 232 265 454 574 2,004 44,516 335: CANNABIS TAX FUND GRANT PRGM 211 192 419 417 1,852 41,776 351: WIOA GRANT 65 48 208 103 235 2,440 353: CAL LIBRARY LITERACY SVC GRANT 135 131 376 284 637 8,564 361: HOME HOUSING PROGRAM 274 1,121 822 2,430 975 13,196 362: CDBG FUND 385 1,523 1,148 3,302 1,401 19,050 363: AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN 5,794 3,674 20,348 7,968 15,697 102,038 367: PERMANENT LOCAL HOUSING ALLOCA 2,169 1,611 7,712 3,493 5,501 28,802 368: HOME-AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 291 4,642 458 10,067 1,659 40,111 373: BEVERAGE CONTAINER RECYCLING 49 140 83 304 365 6,486 383: ELAC INSTRUCTIONAL SERV PROG 19 177 32 384 127 2,604 401: WATER FUND 33,031 53,649 62,050 116,338 72,407 949,004 402: WATER TREATMENT WQA EPA FUND 5,332 19,470 9,948 42,221 14,490 235,404 411: SEWER FUND 10,652 13,018 21,759 28,229 19,965 201,084 421: REFUSE FUND 2,878 5,086 9,341 11,028 9,921 121,417 501: CITY SHOP FUND 10,131 13,697 17,782 29,702 22,749 302,908 601: STREET CAPITAL PROJECT FUND 107 81 213 175 942 21,115 621: SALES TAX BOND DEBT SERVICE FD - - - - - - 841: ATLANTIC_GARVEY SA 909 464 1,704 1,006 1,326 9,378 842: MERGED SA 480 517 1,687 1,122 1,251 7,680 Central Service Departments

Page 108 of 282 ends

29 Cost Allocation Plan

Appendix C
Appendix C provides the table detailing the full administration indirect rate.

Page 109 of 282 ends

30 Cost Allocation Plan

Table C: Administrative Indirect Table

Page 110 of 282 ends

27368 Via Industria, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92590 800.755.6864 | Fax: 888.326.6864 www.willdan.com

Page 111 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.H.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Amendment to Agreement No. 2466-AB, and Task Order 2455-AA concerning the S. Garfield and S. Atlantic Water Projects

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

3. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Executive Summary:

Capital Improvements Project (“CIP) No. 99032 – S. Atlantic Blvd and S. Garfield Ave Phase VI Water Main Improvements (“Project”) consists of the installation of water main along S.

Atlantic Blvd, S. Garfield Ave, and Harding Ave, including the construction of water service line replacement, installation of new fire hydrants and laterals, fire services lines, and appurtenances, valves, abandonment of existing water mains, tie-in to existing systems, and trench repair restoration. The City Council awarded the project construction to J.A. Salazar (“Contractor”) on February 19, 2025. Unforeseen conditions resulted in the need for change orders and extending the duration of the project. The Public Works Director (“Director”) recommends amending the current agreement with J.A. Salazar, increasing the contract amount by $153,612; for a total of $3,736,402, plus $346,728 contingency and revising the

Page 112 of 282 ends

Task Order 2455-AA1, with SA Associates., for an additional $137,000 for a new not to exceed amount of $367,000.

Background:

The City Council awarded the Project construction to J.A. Salazar on February 19, 2025. Once the project started, it was discovered that there exists a concrete road under the asphalt surface. City staff did pothole at various locations before the start of the project, to identify locations of utilities but did not encounter the concrete surface. The potholes were in the lanes adjacent to the curb, while the concrete road was under the two lanes on both sides of the centerline. None of the available plans and records showed the concrete road.

This discovery resulted in the Contractor providing the City with a change order proposal, to sawcut and haul away the concrete in the amount of $313,975.35 for the saw cutting and removal of the asphalt and concrete from both S. Atlantic and S. Garfield. The process also resulted in the increase of the project duration by 54 days as requested by the Contractor. The Director obtained independent cost estimate to verify the reasonability of the proposed cost estimate and the requested duration increase of the project and determined that is was fair.

In addition, due an increase in the size of a proposed vault for operation and maintenance, the Contractor provided a proposal of $13,036.97 for the cost difference with the original smaller vault. Staff also verified that the cost provided is fair. The increased size of the vault will not result in any increase in the project duration.

The Director is approving part of the required work on Atlantic and the vault increase using the existing contingency, and is requesting an increase in the Agreement with the Contractor to be able to pay for the additional required services.

As a result of the duration increase of the project, SA Associates provided the City with a proposal to amend their task order to reflect the new project duration, for an increase of $137,000 for a new not to exceed amount of $367,000.

It is recommended that the City Council approve the amendment to the J.A. Salazar Agreement to a not to exceed amount of $3,736,402, plus $346,728 contingency and approve the revision of Task Order 2455-AA1, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with SA Associates., a new not to exceed amount of $367,000.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This Project meets the City’s goal to maintain, build and modernize infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our city and community as it aims to replace old water lines and bring our water infrastructure up to current standards. Additionally, this project is part of the City’s water bond-funded projects intended to enhance water infrastructure in the City.

Fiscal Impact:

The FY 24-25 budget includes funding for CIP 99031 – S. Garfield and S. Atlantic Water Main replacements. If approved, the proposed Amendment to Agreement 2466-AB with J.A. Salazar would result in a new contract amount of $3,630,887 plus a revised contingency amount of $520,092 for a total of $4,140,979.

Page 113 of 282 ends

Additionally, the proposed revision to SA Associates Task Order 2455-AA1 would result in a new not to exceed amount of $367,000. Available funds from other Water CIP projects, that have not yet started, will be used to cover the increased costs for this project.

Attachments:

1. Attachment 1 - SA Associates proposal

2. Attachment 2 - J.A. Salazar proposal

Page 114 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4,2025
ATTACHMENT 1
SA Associates Proposal

Page 115 of 282 ends

ASSOCIATES
May 20,2025
Ziad Mazboudi
lnterim City Engineer
City of Monterey Park
320 W. Newmark Avenue
Monterey Park, CA 91754
Project:: Construction Management and lnspection Services for S. Atlantic Boulevard and S. Garfield Avenue Phase Vl Water Main lmprovements
Subject: Additional Fee for Removal of concrete at S. Atlantic Boulevard and S. Garfield Avenue Dear Ziad'.
ln accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit our proposalto provide additional Construction Management and lnspection Services for the S. Atlantic Boulevard and S. Garfield Avenue Phase Vl Water Main lmprovements Project.

A Change Order request was submitted by the Contractor for removal of concrete under S. Atlantic Boulevard and S. Garfield Avenue in the amount of $313,975,35. The schedule for this work will add an additional 54 working days to the project.

Based on the above, our fee to provide additional Construction Management and lnspection Services will be $137,000. Ourfee is based on providing fulltime lnspection, and construction management @ 25 hours per week. We had initially proposed 20 hours per week for the Construction Manager, but based on our current experience on the project, we are increasing this time by 5 additional hours per week.

No overtime or weekend work is included. We will use the same rates as submitted in our original proposal.

Thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal to provide additional services to the City. Should you have any questions or require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,
yJ-ttrr raD fte ;
Shahnawaz Ahmad, P.E.

President
Tel: 626.821.3456
E-Mail : sahmad@saassociates. net
1130 W. Huntington Drive, Unit 12, Arcadia, CA 91007 ' TEL626.821.3456 ' FaX626.445 1461

Page 116 of 282 ends

Staff Report
June 4,2025
J.A, satazar construction & srpfrlH:J#il:;

Page 117 of 282 ends

J.A. SALAZAR CONSTRUCTION & SUPPLY CORP

GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR
Llcense No. ?43587 A, C34
613 N. Ilarbor Blvd
La Habra CA 90631
Tel (562) 691-3647 - Fax (562) 691-1092

PROPOSAL
Apil24.2025
Jorge Lovo
City of Monterey Park
Reference:

S. ATLANTIC BLVD AND S. GARFIELD AVE PHASE VI WATER MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS
SPECIFTCATTON NO. 2024-01 0
CDN PROJECT #
COR - Vault Material Cost Difference
We propose to provide the foliowing based on the description and direction given, per your request:

L Existing 8x I I x7 6" thick vault - S24,105.57 x lSo/a markup : $27 ,721.41

2. Revised 9xl2x8' 6" vault - $35,442.07 x lSYo markup: $40,758.38 Total Cost Difference: $13,036.97
Clarifications: Proposal is valid fbr l0 days {iom above date. Material pricing is fluid if price is not accepted within ten days, material costs will need to be revisited. Pricing is for material costs only.

Installation is not covered.

E{glusions: Permits, engineering of any kind, traffic control plans, handling of any hazardous materials, reduced hours, weekend or holiday work, testing, bonds, concrete, paving, installation.

Please contact rne if you have any questions, thank you.

Sincerely,
Jose Salazar
President
S E W F R * W ^\'f
b. R. l- I \ E * S.f O R \,1 D R i\ I ),,i * STR LJ CT U RE S

Page 118 of 282 ends

J.A. SALAZAR CONSTRUCTIOI\ & SUPPLY CORP

GENERAL ENCINEERING CONTRACTOR
License No.743587 A' C34
613 N. Hrrbor Blvd
La Habrr CA 9063t
Tel (562) 691-3641 - Fax (562) 691-t092

PROPOSAL
May 2,7A25
Jorge Lovo
City of Monterey Park
Reference:

S. ATLANTIC BLVD AND S. GARFIELD AVE PHASE VIWATER MAIN

IMPROVEMENTS
SPECIF|CATION NO. 2024-010
QUEST CDN PROJECT # 94/,8362
COR * Saw-Cutting and Removals - Due to concrete under the asphalt.

We propose to provide the following based on the description and direction given, per your request:
l. Saw-cut trench asphalt up to 4" and concrete underneath up to 9" * l2'1 thick. (2) concrete saws up to 85LF per hour for a total of 40 days of saw-cutting. Two laborers to assist with clean up and traffic control. Saw cutting will be trench width up to 36" wide.

2. Break out asphalt up to 4" thick and concrete underneath up to 9" - 12" thick with (2) skid- steers with breakers. Mini excavator to remove asphalt and concrete and load on the truck.

Cost based on I 12 hours or 14 days.

3. Material to be hauled to City of Monterey Parks yard and disposed of by City of Monterey Park.

4. Credit is included for trucking and profiling.

Estimated Cost based on Hours: $313,975.35
Total Days Added to the Contract: 54 Days
Clarifications: Proposal is valid for 30 days from above date.

Exclusions: Permits, engineering of any kind, traffic control plans, handling of any hazardous materials, reduced hours, weekend or holiday work, testing, bonds, concrete, paving, double saw-cut for T-Cut, disposal of materials, processing of materials for dumping purposes.

Please contact me if you have any questions, thank you.

Sincerely,
Jose Salazar
President
SEW E R* WAl'ERLI N E*STORM DRAI N*STRI..iCTU RES

Page 119 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 9.I.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Robert Aguirre, Director of Recreation & Community Services Memo Chavez, Recreation Supervisor
Subject: Amendment to agreement 2314-A with Corporate Coach Charters & Tours and increase the contract amount by $35,000 to provide recreation trips and event shuttle services in Fiscal Year 2025-26

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Executive Summary:

The Recreation and Community Services Department utilizes Corporate Coach Charters & Tours to provide essential transportation services that support the department’s recreational programs, including daycare field trips, senior trips, and special event shuttles. The current agreement term is from July 2023 to June 2026, with a not-to-exceed amount of $60,000 which Corporate Coach Charters & Tours is approaching. City Council approval is required to increase the contract amount in excess of $60,000.

Due to increased participation and expanded program offerings, transportation needs have grown beyond that contemplated in the current agreement. To ensure continuity of service and avoid disruptions to scheduled activities, the Recreation and Community Services Director ("Director") is recommending the City Council approve an amendment to the agreement and authorize an increase of $35,000 to the contract amount, for a total of $95,000.

Page 120 of 282 ends

This action will enable the Recreation and Community Services Department ("Department") to maintain its programming schedule and continue delivering recreational opportunities that enhance community engagement and quality of life for residents of all ages.

Background:

Corporate Coach Charters & Tours provides transportation services for the Department, supporting various community programs. These programs include daycare field trips, the annual Hollywood Bowl trip, senior leisure trips, and special event shuttles for the Lunar New Year and Cherry Blossom festivals. These services are essential to the specialized recreational programs, which cater to diverse populations within the community.

The proposed amendment is exempt from bidding pursuant to Monterey Park Municipal Code ("MPMC") section 3.20.050(2) as the City has an existing agreement with Corporate Coach Charters & Tours.

Strategic Plan Goal:

Fiscal Impact:

An amendment to the agreement with Corporate Coach Charters & Tours will increase the agreement amount by $35,000, for a total of $95,000, to cover the anticipated expenditures in the 2025-26 Fiscal Year. These funds will be budgeted in Fiscal Year 2025-26 with Prop A fund 238-6511 as part of the regular budgeting process.

Attachments:

None

Page 121 of 282 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK RECOGNIZING THE MONTH OF JUNE 2025 AS LGBTQ+ PRIDE MONTH
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Monterey Park as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:

A. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning people are our family, friends, neighbors, and co-workers who contribute meaningfully to our community.

B. The fight for dignity, equality, and inclusion for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning people has been hard-fought in the streets and the courts of this country.

C. These fights for inclusion have made much progress toward changing the hearts and minds of people in many parts of the world.

D. The rainbow flag is an iconic symbol of the LGBTQ+ community and aims to celebrate inclusivity, diversity, and unity.

E. All are welcome in Monterey Park to live, work, play, and every family, in any shape, deserves a place to call home where they are safe, happy, and supported by friends and neighbors.

F. Our community, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, and expression, must feel valued, safe, empowered, and supported by their peers and community leaders.

G. The City of Monterey Park denounces prejudice and unfair discrimination based on age, gender identity, gender expression, race, color, religion, marital status, national origin, sexual orientation, or physical attributes as an affront to our fundamental principles.

H. The City Council of the City of Monterey Park encourages all to observe the month of June as LGBTQ+ Pride Month and urges residents and the community to recognize the contributions made by the LGBTQ+ community and to actively promote the principles of equality, liberty, and justice.

SECTION 2:Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

Page 122 of 282 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 of 2 ends

SECTION 3:Recordation. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to sign this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Monterey Park and the City Clerk, or her duly appointed deputy, may attest thereto.

SECTION 4:Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2025.
________________________________
Vinh T. Ngo, Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk

Page 123 of 282 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK DECLARING JUNE 6, 2025, NATIONAL GUN VIOLENCE
AWARENESS DAY AND JUNE 7-8, 2025, AS WEAR ORANGE

WEEKEND IN MONTEREY PARK
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Monterey Park as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:

A. Every day in the United States, more than 120 people are killed as a result of gun violence. Every year in the United States, over 40,000 people are killed with guns and approximately 85,000 are shot and wounded.

B. The gun homicide rate in the United States is 26 times higher than that of other developed countries, but research shows that common sense and public safety laws can regulate gun violence.

C. The first Friday in June marks the beginning of a three-day movement honoring the victims and survivors of gun violence and calling for an end to the epidemic. In 2025, National Gun Violence Awareness Day is observed on June 6 and Wear Orange Weekend is observed on June 7-8.

D. National Gun Violence Awareness Day began on June 2, 2015, in honor of what would have been Hadiya Pendleton’s 18th birthday. Hadiya was a 15-year-old girl who was tragically shot and killed in Chicago on January 29, 2013.

E. In response to this tragedy, Haidya’s friends wore orange to honor her and encouraged others to also do so to raise awareness and to advocate for a future that is free from gun violence.

F. Wear Orange Weekend follows National Gun Violence Awareness Day and honors the thousands of people in the United States whose lives are taken or forever changed by gun violence each year. Orange was chosen because it represents the color hunters wear to protect themselves from gunfire.

G. The Monterey Park City Council has advocated for gun safety and gun violence prevention. In light of the January 21, 2023, mass shooting incident, the Monterey Park City Council adopted firearm safety ordinances and added new chapters to the Monterey Park Municipal Code to protect the community from violence resulting from firearms.

H. In an effort to practice and promote greater awareness of gun violence and gun safety initiatives, the Monterey Park City Council also hosted a Gun Violence

Page 124 of 282 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 of 2 ends

Restraining Order (GVRO) Training to educate the public on how to a GVRO can protect themselves, their loved ones, and the community.

I. The City of Monterey Park calls on its residents to practice and promote greater awareness of gun violence and gun safety and give heightened attention to gun violence awareness during the summer months when there is a prominent increase in gun violence. More information regarding firearm safety, rules, and other resources can be found on the City of Monterey Park’s website at https://www.montereypark.ca.gov/1592/Firearms.

J. The City of Monterey Park encourages residents to wear orange on Wear Orange Weekend to show that they are not targets and do not have to live in fear that gunfire can ring out at any moment. Community members and leaders are also encouraged to collaboratively work together towards finding ways to make Monterey Park a safer community.

K. The City of Monterey Park memorializes the victims of the Star Ballroom shooting, as well as all the victims who have been killed or injured due to gun violence, in declaring June 6, 2025, as National Gun Violence Awareness Day and June 7-8, 2025, as Wear Orange Weekend in the City of Monterey Park.

SECTION 4:Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of June, 2025.
________________________________
Vinh T. Ngo, Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk

Page 125 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 10.A.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Philip Lanzafame, Interim Director of Community Development Subject: Continued public hearing to consider introduction and first reading of an Ordinance amending the Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) to implement the General Plan regulating mixed use development and development standards (ZCA 25-02)

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing and taking testimonial and documentary evidence;

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Type of Action (Legislative; Quasi-Judicial; or Advisory):

In considering the Zoning Code Amendment, the City Council acts in its discretionary legislative capacity. The City Council must make the following findings pursuant to MPMC §

Page 126 of 282 ends

These findings are included in the attached Ordinance.

Executive Summary:

The City’s General Plan contains the Revised Monterey Park 2040 Land Use Element (“LUE”) and 6th cycle (2021-2029) Housing Element (“HE”) establishing a vision and long-term goals for development, housing, and redevelopment within the City.

The attached Ordinance implements the LUE and HE by amending the MPMC to allow residential and mixed use development in mixed use zones, consistent with the LUE, subject to those development standards in the underlying zone. These changes clarify that the General Plan applies to all properties, takes precedence over conflicting or obsolete regulations, and creates a consistent framework that allows for expanded housing opportunities consistent with the City’s vision and long-term development goals.

This item was originally noticed for public hearing at the May 7, 2025, City Council meeting at which time the Interim Director of Community Development (“Director”) requested a continuance. The City Council continued the public hearing to June 4, 2025. The draft ordinance is attached for the Council’s consideration.

Background:

On November 3, 2020, City voters approved Measure JJ (Ordinance No. 2198) which adopted the Revised LUE and authorized the City Council to take all appropriate action to implement the LUE.

In March 2023, the California State Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”), certified the City’s HE. Government Code § 65583(c) requires that cities include programs which set forth a schedule of actions the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the HE.

HE and LUE Programs

The HE and LUE included several programs that reconcile the General Plan and MPMC to encourage the production of a variety of housing types and at various affordability levels, including:

HE Program 7 and LUE Implementation Program 6 require the City to either amend or repeal the North Atlantic, Mid Atlantic and Garvey-Garfield Specific Plans (collectively, the “Specific Plans”) and replace them with zoning designations consistent with the LUE.

HE Program 11 and LUE Implementation Program 1 require the City to resolve inconsistencies between the MPMC and the General Plan related to mixed-use areas.

Currently, the P-D overlay serves as the mechanism through which the MPMC implements the LUE’s mixed-use designation. The HE and LUE, however, contemplate creating a new zoning designation to implement the mixed-use designation. Creating a new zoning designation requires, among other things, the development of standards and procedures, zone changes, and amendments to the adopted zoning map which are anticipated to exceed staff’s capacity and take more time to carefully implement.

Page 127 of 282 ends

Additionally, the detailed Specific Plans require an extensive analysis of land use, circulation, and right-of-way requirements before being amended or repealed. Such analysis requires additional time to ensure that important land use and infrastructure requirements are not inadvertently altered or repealed. To reconcile the time needed for such analysis with the deadlines adopted by the City Council in the HE resulted in the proposed action: a third way to both implement the General Plan and preserve important policy considerations regulated by the existing Specific Plans.

If adopted, the proposed ordinance immediately implements various programs of the HE and LUE while more comprehensive updates are planned and prepared. Specifically, the ordinance amends the MPMC’s general provisions by providing that residential and mixed-use development are permitted when allowed by the LUE designation, subject to the development standards in the underlying zone. The LUE mixed-use designation allows for, both, residential and mixed-use development. Accordingly, the ordinance will allow residential and mixed-use development within the LUE’s mixed-use designation.

Strategic Plan Goal:

The attached ordinance satisfies the 2025-26 Strategic Plan Goal to “Strengthen our local economy and enhance housing opportunities” by achieving the goals and programs set forth in the HE, reducing barriers to encourage housing development, and supporting economic growth in the City.

Legal Notification:

A public hearing was scheduled for May 7, 2025, and a legal notice was duly posted at City Hall, Monterey Park Bruggemeyer Library, and Langley Center and published in Monterey Park Press on April 17, 2025, with affidavits of posting on file. Additionally, 358 notices were mailed to affected property owners. At the May 7, 2025 meeting, the City Council continued the hearing to June 4, 2025.

Fiscal Impact:

There are no identifiable fiscal impacts associated with adopting the Ordinance itself (other than costs associated with codifying the Ordinance).

Attachments:

1. Draft Ordinance

2. Notice of Determination

Page 128 of 282 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Ordinance

Page 129 of 282 ends

ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MONTEREY PARK MUNICIPAL

CODE TO IMPLEMENT THE GENERAL PLAN CONCERNING MIXED

USE DEVELOPMENT AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
The City Council of the City of Monterey Park does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares that:

A. The City initiated the proposed amendments to the Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) pursuant to MPMC § 21.38.020 and § 21.42.010.

B. This Ordinance was reviewed by the Interim City Planner for, in part, consistency with the General Plan, and conformity with the Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”).

C. The Interim City Planner completed review and scheduled a public hearing regarding this Ordinance before the City Council for June 4, 2025.

D. On June 4, 2025, the City Council held a public hearing to receive public testimony and other evidence regarding the proposed Ordinance including, without limitation, information provided to the City Council by the City Planner and public testimony; and
E. The findings in this Ordinance are made based on the entire administrative record including testimony and evidence presented the City Council at its March 19, 2025, public hearing including, without limitation, the staff report submitted by the City Planner.

SECTION 2:Zone Text Amendment Findings. Pursuant to Government Code § 65860 and MPMC § 21.38.050, the City Council finds as follows:

A. Amendments to the MPMC accomplished by this Ordinance are consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan including, without limitation:

1. General Plan Policy 19.8— Encourage a diverse mix of uses that are innovative, competitive, entrepreneurial, local, and sustainable, thereby promoting economic development, increasing City revenues, expanding job growth, increasing property values, and meeting residents’ and visitors’ desires and needs.

2. General Plan Policy 19.9— Accommodate a variety of housing

Page 130 of 282 ends

Ordinance No.
options, including medium- and high-density apartments and condominiums, live/work units, and mixed-use buildings with a residential component.

3. Housing Element Goal 2— Remove governmental constraints to the provision of housing to the greatest extent feasible

4. Housing Element Policy 2.4—Update the MPMC to facilitate residential and mixed-use development in the community.

B. The proposed text amendments are aimed at meeting and implementing the objectives of the General Plan and compliance with all applicable zoning regulations will ensure that any future project will not adversely affect surrounding properties.

C. These regulations promote public health, safety, and general welfare and serve the goals and purposes of the MPMC’s zoning regulations. Among other things, the regulations will reduce barriers to the development of housing to address the California Legislature’s determination regarding a statewide housing shortage.

SECTION 4: Environmental Review. The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed Ordinance pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). The City Council finds and determines that this Ordinance is not subject to further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.; “CEQA”) for the following reasons:

A. This Ordinance will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15060(c)(2)); B. There is no possibility that the Ordinance itself may have a significant effect on the environment (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15061(b)(3));
C. The Ordinance, by itself, does not constitute a “project” as defined in the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15378). The Ordinance is for general policies and procedure-making. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment; and
D. The previous CEQA documents adopted by the City Council (see, Resolution Nos. 12124 and 2022-R2) adequately analyze the changes contemplated by this Ordinance:

1. On December 5, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 12124 certifying the Monterey Park Focused General Plan Update

Page 131 of 282 ends

Ordinance No.

Final Environmental Impact Report (the “FEIR”) (State Clearing House (SCH) No. 2001-01-1074) (Exhibit A), which is incorporated by reference and found at:
https://www.montereypark.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16507/Re so-12124---attachments-included.

2. On January 19, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- R2 adopting an addendum to the FEIR analyzing the impacts of the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element update (“FEIR Addendum”), which is incorporated by reference and found at:
https://www.montereypark.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/16506/20 22-R2---Addendum-to-the-Final-Environmental-Impact-Report.

3. The Housing Goals are an activity contemplated by the EIR and Addendum.

4. The Housing Goals do not contemplate any changes which will require major revisions to the EIR or Addendum, nor are there any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the EIR and Addendum were undertaken.

5. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the EIR and Addendum were certified showing: (1) the Housing Goals will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR or Addendum; and (2) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR or Addendum.

SECTION 5: Planning Agency. Pursuant to MPMC § 2.56.020(a), the City Council is acting as the Planning Agency for purposes of the Project.

SECTION 6: Amendment. MPMC § 21.02.070 is amended and restated as follows:
“§ 21.02.070 Relationship with the General Plan.

This Title is applicable to all real property within the City, and provides the legislative framework for implementing the goals, policies, plans, principles, and standards of the General Plan.

Notwithstanding anything in the applicable zone, residential and mixed-use development are permitted when allowed by the General Plan, subject to discretionary entitlements that may be required pursuant to this Title. Development standards are those contained in the General Plan and the underlying zoning designation.”

Page 132 of 282 ends

Ordinance No.

SECTION 7: Electronic Signatures. This Ordinance may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code § 16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 8: Construction. This Ordinance must be broadly construed to achieve the purposes stated in this Ordinance. It is the City Council’s intent that the provisions of this Ordinance be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Ordinance.

SECTION 9: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular fact from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 10: Reliance On Record. Each and every one of the findings and determination in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 11: Severability. If any part of this Ordinance or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable.

SECTION 12: Preservation. This Resolution does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or prelude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution’s effective date. Any such amended part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Resolution.

SECTION 13: Limitations. The City Council’s analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in evaluating a project that absolute and perfect knowledge of all possible aspects of the project will not exist. One of the major limitations on analysis of the project is the City Council’s lack of knowledge of future events. In all instances, best efforts have been made to form accurate assumptions. Somewhat related to this are the limitations on the city’s ability to solve what are in effect regional, state, and national problems and issues. The City must work within the political framework within which it exists and with the limitations inherent in that framework.

SECTION 14: Recordation. The City Clerk, or designee, is directed to certify the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; cause it to be entered into the City of Monterey Park’s book of original ordinances; make a note of the passage and adoption in the records of

Page 133 of 282 ends

Ordinance No.
this meeting; and, within 15 days after the passage and adoption of this Ordinance, and cause it to be published or posted in accordance with California law.

SECTION 15: Effective Date. This Ordinance will become effective 30 days after second reading and adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of _________, 2025.
____________________________
Vinh T. Ngo, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
By:________________________________
Justin A. Tamayo, Assistant City Attorney
Exhibit A – FEIR (SCH No. 2001-01-1074)

Page 134 of 282 ends

Exhibit A
FEIR (SCH No. 2001-01-1074)

Page 135 of 282 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Notice of Determination

Page 136 of 282 ends

were not]

was not]

2. _________________________________________
Print Form
Notice of Determination Appendix D
To:

Office of P
lanning and Research
U.S. Mail:

P.O. Box
3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
Street Address:
1400 Tenth St., Rm 113
Sacramento, CA 95814
County Clerk
County of: _________________________________
Address: __________________________________
From:

Public Agency: ___________________________
Address: ________________________________
_______________________________________
Contact: ___________________________
Phone: __________________________________
Lead Agency (if different from above):
_______________________________________
Address: ________________________________
_______________________________________
Contact: _________________________________
Phone: __________________________________
SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code.

State Clearinghouse Number (if submitted to State Clearinghouse):______________________________ Project Title: _________________________________________________________________________ Project Applicant: _____________________________________________________________________ Project Location (include county):_________________________________________________________ Project Description:

This is to advise that the ____________________________________________ has approved the above ( Lead Agency or Responsible Agency
)
described project on _______________ and
has made the following determinations regarding the above (date)
described project.

1. The project [ will will not] have a significant effect on the environment.

2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

A Negative Declaration was
prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

3. Mitigation measures [ were made a condition of the approval of the project.

4. A mitigation reporting
or monitoring plan [ was was not] adopted for this project.

5. A statement of Overriding Considerations [ was adopted for this project.

6. Findings [ were were not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.

This is to certify that the final EIR with comments and responses and record of project approval, or the negative Declaration, is available to the General Public at:
________________________________________________________________________________ Signature (Public Agency): _____________________________ Title: ____________________________ Date: _______________________________ Date Received for filing at OPR: ____________________ Authority
cited: Sections 21083, Public Resources Code.

Reference Section 21000-21174, Public Resources Code. Revised 2011

Page 137 of 282 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: June 4, 2025
Agenda Item Number: 10.B.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Martha Garcia, Director of Finance
Subject: Public Hearing and Approval of the FY2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, and FY2025-2026 Annual Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships Programs

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Conduct a public hearing and receive public comments and testimony on the FY 2025- 2029 Consolidated Plan (“CP”), and FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan (“AAP”);

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute sub-recipient agreements with the non-profit organizations receiving CDBG and HOME allocations in the AAP; and

5. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) provides Community Development Block Grant (“CDBG”) and HOME Investment Partnerships (“HOME”) funds to the City of Monterey Park. As part of the process to receive funding, the City must develop and submit the FY 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan (“CP”), and the FY 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan (“AAP”). The City’s current documents will expire on June 30, 2025. These documents outline extensive strategies that align community needs with available resources to achieve statutory goals of promoting decent housing, creating a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, particularly for low- and moderate income persons.

Background:

The City’s CP and AAP are essential planning documents that collectively guide the City’s approach to housing, community development, and equitable access to federal funding.

Page 138 of 282 ends

Together, these plans create a framework to address local needs while ensuring compliance with HUD regulations.

Preparation for the FY 2025-2029 CP and FY 2025-2026 AAP began at the end of 2024, and included community and stakeholder surveys and community meetings. The purpose of the public hearing is to approve the community needs and priorities for the FY 2025-2029 CP; it serves as an opportunity for the public to provide comments on the FY 2025-2029 CP and the FY 2025-2026 AAP before the City Council’s approval. In addition, the AAP provides City Council with the opportunity to approve the FY 2025-2026 CDBG and HOME Funding Allocations.

The details and purpose of each document are provided below:

• CP: The CP serves as a comprehensive housing affordability strategy, community development plan, and submission for funding under any of HUD’s entitlement formula grant programs. The CP establishes priority needs and goals that align with community needs and ensures compliance with HUD national objectives and regulations.

• AAP: The AAP is an operational document that details how the City of Monterey Park will implement the CP on a yearly basis. It also serves as the annual application for federal funds under the HUD CDBG and HOME formula grant program.

HUD has released the City’s entitlement allocation for FY 2025-2026, and staff is anticipating approximately $563,008 in CDBG funding and approximately $285,787.37 in HOME funds. All proposed activities' budgets will be proportionally increased or decreased from the estimated funding levels to match actual allocation amounts. After extensive consideration, staff is recommending that the activities receive funding through the CDBG and HOME programs, as detailed in the City's FY 2025-2026 AAP (Attachment A) and summarized below:

CDBG Program: There are three broad funding categories that are considered eligible under CDBG regulations. A project must either (1) provide benefits to low- or moderate-income persons, (2) eliminate slum or blighted conditions, or (3) satisfy an urgent need. In addition, of the CDBG funds received, no more than 15% ($84,451) of the annual grant amount can be used for public service; no more than 20% ($112,601) of the grant amount can be used for Planning and Administration, and at least 70% ($394,106) of all funds must be used for low-to- moderate-income activities.

The proposed PY 2025-2026 One Year Action Plan proposed activities and funding are as follows:

2025-26 CDBG ACTIVITIES
Administration $112,601.00
Fair Housing $ 20,000.00
ADA/Sidewalk Improvement Project $215,203.50
Facility Improvement Project $215,203.50
Total 2025-2026 Allocation $563,008.00

HOME Program: In reviewing the HOME funds recommendations, no more than 10% ($28,578) can be used for Planning and Administration. The balance of funds ($257,209) can

Page 139 of 282 ends

only be used for housing activities. Previous amounts were carried over from prior years and budgeted for Affordable Housing projects.

The proposed Program Year (PY) 2025-2026 One Year Action Plan proposed activities and funding are as follows:

2025-26 HOME ACTIVITIES
Administration $28,578.00
Rehabilitation Projects $214,340.37
CHDO Project $ 42,869.00
Total 2025-2026 Allocation $285,787.37

Citizen Participation Process
Federal laws relating to HUD funds require cities to provide citizens with specific information about the amount of monies expected for the programs and the range of activities that may be undertaken with those funds. Federal regulations also require a jurisdiction to hold a public hearing to obtain the views of citizens on such issues as housing, other community development needs, and the use of the CDBG and HOME monies.

The public notice was published on May 2, 2025, in the Monterey Park Progress newspaper to inform the public of the 30-day public review period and Public Hearing for discussions on the 2025-2029 CP, and 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan. The documents were available for public review from May 2, 2025, through June 3, 2025. At the time of preparing this staff report, City staff have not received any written comments concerning the documents.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This item supports Council Strategic Goal 3
"Strengthen our Local Economy and
Enhance Housing Opportunities" by
facilitating housing development and
affordability, by way of the adoption of a
new 5-Year Consolidated Plan for HUD
HOME/CDBG funding programs.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund. The FY 2025-2026 AAP includes HUD funding allocation for CDBG, and HOME programs.

Attachments:

Page 140 of 282 ends

1. 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan

Page 141 of 282 ends

Staff Report
May 27, 2025
A
TTACHMENT 1
2025-2029 Consolidated Plan/
2025-2026 Annual Action Plan

Page 142 of 282 ends

2025-2029 CONSOLIDATED PLAN
2025-2026 ACTION PLAN

City of Monterey Park
320 West Newmark Avenue
Monterey Park, CA 91754

Page 143 of 282 ends

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK TOC - 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) .......................................................................... 1 The Process .......................................................................................................................... 6 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) ............................................................................ 6 PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) ................................ 7 PR-15 Citizen Participation – 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) .................................................... 12 Needs Assessment .............................................................................................................. 15 NA-05 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 15 NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) .................................................................... 17 NA-35 Public Housing – 91.205(b) ............................................................................................................ 32 NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment – 91.205(c) .................................................................................... 35 NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.205 (b,d) ............................................................ 43 NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs – 91.215 ( f) .......................................................... 48 Housing Market Analysis .................................................................................................... 50 MA-05 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 50 MA-10
Number of Housing Units – 91.210(a)&(b)(2) ................................................................................ 51 MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing - 91.210(a) ................................................................. 54 MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) ......................................................... 56 MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing – 91.210(b) ...................................................................................... 59 MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services – 91.210(c) ............................................................................... 62 MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services – 91.210(d) ........................................................................ 65 MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.210(e) .................................................................................... 68 MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets – 91.215 (f) .......................................................... 70 MA-50
Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ......................................................................................... 75 MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by LMI Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2) ............ 76 MA-65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) .............................................................................. 77

Page 144 of 282 ends

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK TOC - 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Strategic Plan ..................................................................................................................... 78 SP-05 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 78 SP-10 Geographic Priorities – 91.215 (a)(1) .............................................................................................. 79 SP-25 Priority Needs - 91.215(a)(2) .......................................................................................................... 81 SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions – 91.215 (b) ................................................................................... 84 SP-35 Anticipated Resources - 91.215(a)(4), 9 1.220(c)(1,2) .................................................................... 85 SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure – 91.215(k) ..................................................................................... 88 SP-45 Goals Summary – 91.215(a)(4) ...................................................................................................... 91 SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement – 91.215(c) ............................................................. 94 SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.215(h) .................................................................................... 95 SP-60 Homelessness Strategy – 91.215(d) ............................................................................................... 97 SP-65 Lead-Based Paint Hazards – 91.215(i) ..........................................................................................100 SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy – 91.215(j) ...................................................................................................101 SP-80 Monitoring – 91.230 ...................................................................................................................... 103 Action Plan ......................................................................................................................... 104 AP-15 Expected Resources – 91.220(c)(1,2) .......................................................................................... 104 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................................ 108 AP-35 Projects – 91.220(d) ...................................................................................................................... 110 AP-38 Project Summary ........................................................................................................................... 112 AP-50 Geographic Distribution – 91.220(f) .............................................................................................. 114 AP-55 Affordable Housing – 91.220(g) .................................................................................................... 116 AP-60 Public Housing – 91.220(h) ........................................................................................................... 118 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities – 91.220(i) ........................................................... 119 AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing – 91.220(j) ................................................................................... 121 AP-85 Other Actions – 91.220(k) ............................................................................................................. 124 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements 91.220(l)(1,2,4) .......................................................................... 127

Page 145 of 282 ends

Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 1
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Executive Summary
ES-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)
Introduction
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requires the City of Monterey Park to complete a Consolidated Plan (ConPlan) to receive funds under Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) programs. ConPlans are required to be prepared every five years and include five Annual Action Plans to be produced for each year.

The ConPlan serves four functions:
• It is a planning document, built upon public participation and input. • It is the application for funds under HUD's formula grant programs: CDBG and HOME. • It articulates local priorities.
• It is a five-year strategy the jurisdiction will follow in implementing HUD programs.

The City of Monterey Park (“City”) has developed the ConPlan through comprehensive consultation and citizen input. The ConPlan identifies the City’s needs in housing, community development, and economic development. It also presents the City’s long -term strategies to address the identified needs. The One- Year Action Plans provide the activities that will be carried out for the specific year and funding amounts for each activity.

A completed ConPlan describes the lead agency responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of the plan and agencies, groups, and organizations that participate in the process. It also includes a summary of the citizen participation process, public comments, and efforts made to broaden public participation in preparing the plan.

The ConPlan includes the following sections:
• Executive Summary
• The Process
• Needs Assessment
• Market Analysis
• Strategic Plan
• First Year Annual Action Plan
The first year's annual action plan (Action Plan) for fiscal year 2025 (FY25) is a part of the ConPlan. The FY 25 Action Plan identifies specific goals consistent with the Five-Year Strategy and lists projects, programs and resources that will be used to implement the Strategy during Fiscal Year 2025-2026. This ConP lan covers the period from July 1, 2025 through June 30, 2029.

Page 146 of 282 ends

Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 2
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview The strategies and projects outlined in the Con Plan are intended to benefit low- and moderate-income residents, improve distressed and blighted neighborhoods with high concentrations of low - and moderate-income residents, and positively impact the City as a whole. These Strategies will be coordinated with other federal and state grant programs and local initiatives to meet the objectives outlined in the plan. The Annual Action Plan will focus on goals established within the Five -Year 2025- 2029 Con Plan-Strategic Plan.

The primary objective of the CDBG Program is the development of viable urban communities, which is achieved by providing the following General Objective Categories. The City of Monterey Park incorporated outcome measures for activities in accordance with the Federal Register Notice dated March 7, 2006, which require the following Performance Measure Objectives/Outcomes to be associated with each activity funded:

General Objective Categories - Activities will meet one of the following:
• Decent Housing (DH)
• A Suitable Living Environment (SL)
• Economic Opportunity (EO) General
Outcome Categories - Activities will meet one of the following:
• Availability/Accessibility (1)
• Affordability (2)
• Sustainability (3)
The City of Monterey Park has a range of housing and community development needs. CDBG funds alone are not adequate to address the myriad of needs identified during the public outreach process and summarized in the Needs Assessment of this ConPlan . Recognizing the national objectives of the CDBG program and specific program regulations, the City intends to use CDBG funds to coordinate programs, services, and projects to create a decent and suitable living environment to benefit low - and moderate- income households and those with special needs. Needs which have been determined to be a High Priority level will receive funding during the Five -Year ConPlan. The Low Priority Need may be funded based on the availability of funds. The priorities for the FY 2025 -2029 ConPlan established in consu ltation with residents and community groups will be prioritized in the following order:

Page 147 of 282 ends

Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 3
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
High Priority
• Improve, Maintain, and Expand Affordable Housing
• Promote Equal Housing Opportunity
• Support Economic Development Opportunities
• Planning and Administration
Evaluation of past performance
The City has made progress meeting Con Plan goals and priority needs. Many of the activities performed have contributed to stabilizing the City's low -income neighborhoods and improved the living conditions of low- to moderate-income families and individuals. Overall, the strategies and goals outlined in the Con Plan are evaluated and reported out annually through the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) process. The CAPER covers a program year (July 1 st-June 30th) and is prepared by the City’s Housing Department.

The City has made progress meeting Con Plan goals and priority needs. Many of the activities performed have contributed to stabilizing the City's low -income neighborhoods and improved the living conditions of low- to moderate-income families and individuals.
• Major activities focused on preservation of the City’s affordable housing stock through renovations performed on owner -occupied housing. The scope of the renovations varied depending on the program and household needs with improvements ranging from basic health and safety improvements to full-scale renovation projects eliminating blighted conditions. • Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) administered by the Los Angeles County Development Authority (LACDA) on behalf of the City of Monterey Park, offered tenant assistance for those qualifying low- to moderate-income residents.
• Housing, supportive services and case management were provided to homeless persons through several of the City's County partners such as Los Angeles Homeless Service Authority. • The City’s subrecipient, Housing Rights Center, continued to assist the City in meeting its obligations to affirmatively further fair housing choice within Monterey Park.

The most recent past performance evaluation and reporting can be found in the FY 20 23–2024 Comprehensive Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER). This report provides both a summary and details of resources, distribution, and accomplishments for CDBG and HOME funded programs.

Page 148 of 282 ends

Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 4
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The City launched a comprehensive outreach strategy to enhance and broaden citizen participation in the preparation of the ConPlan. The City informed the public that it was in the process of creating the 2025- 2029 ConPlan and encouraged public participation by hosting community workshops, a focus group meeting, numerous one-on-one interviews, and a public hearing.

In accordance with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan, residents and stakeholders were able to participate in the development of the 2025-2029 ConPlan through community workshops, focus group meeting, and a public hearing. Efforts were made to encourag e participation by low - and moderate- income persons, particularly those living in areas where HUD funds are proposed to be used, and by residents of predominantly low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Efforts were made to encourage the participation of minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities.

The City conducted a combined community participation process for its 2025 -2029 ConPlan and Assessment of Fair Housing as outlined in the Citizen Participation Plan. The City engaged in a multi - pronged approach to seek and obtain meaningful feedback from residents, agencies, and service providers, along with members of the public.

The four (4) methods of outreach were:

1. Community Needs Survey- The survey was open to the publi c from December 2, 2024, to February 11, 2025 and made available in English, Spanish and Chinese . The City received 129 resident and 3 stakeholder responses.

2. Community Meetings - The City held two in -person community meetings. A notice regarding both meetings was published on November 11, 2024 in the Monterey Park Progress and posted at Monterey Park City Hall, Langley Community Center and Monterey Park Public Library. During the meetings, staff received public comments on the 2025-2029 ConPlan draft goals and priority needs. a. December 9, 2024 - This meeting took place at 6:00 p.m. – Monterey Park City Hall Community Room.
b. January 28, 2025 - This meeting took place at 6:00 p.m. – Monterey Park City Hall Community Room.
c. February 12, 2025 - This meeting took place at 10:00 a.m. – Monterey Park’s Women’s Club.

3. Public Hearings - One public hearing w as conducted by the Monterey Park City Council. The public hearings took place in the Council Chambers at 320 W. Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754. a. June 4, 2025, at 6:3 0 p.m. - A notice was published on published in the Monterey Park Progress newspaper May 1, 2025. During the meeting, staff received public comments on the 2025 -2029 ConPlan draft goals and priority needs.

Page 149 of 282 ends

Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 5
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)

4. City Department and Stakeholder Consultations - The City conducted consultations with local and regional service providers, representatives of various County departments, advocacy organizations, and local leaders during the months of December 2024 through April 2025. 30-Day Public Review and Comment Period
The public review and public comment period for the complete draft 2025 -2029 ConPlan began on May 2, 2025 and closed on June 3, 2025. The availability of the draft 2025-2029 ConPlan was published in the Monterey Park Progress newspaper on May 1, 2025.

Summary of public comments
Community Meetings - Public comments included the need for affordable housing, social services, homeless services and homeownership assistance.

Public Hearings – Comments to be inserted after public hearing.

Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them The City accepted all comments provided during the community engagement process.

Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them The City of Monterey Park accepted all the comments that were received.

Summary
Examination of 201 6-2020 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the 201 6-2020 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, in addition to local data, as well as consultation with citizens and stakeholders revealed high priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated CDBG and HOME funds over the five -year period of the ConPlan . The investment of CDBG and HOME funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by the goals of the Strategic Plan. Activities submitted for consideration in response to any solicitation or Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) process must conform with one of the Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action-oriented, measurable goals to receive consideration for CDBG and HOME funds.

Page 150 of 282 ends

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 6
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
The Process
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)
Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source.

Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator MONTEREY PARK Finance Department
HOME Administrator MONTEREY PARK Finance Department
Table 1 – Responsible Agencies
Narrat
ive
The Finance Department is the lead in the administration of CDBG, and HOME funds and development of the Consolidated Plan. The City is an entitlement community and receives CDBG, and HOME funds directly from HUD.

Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
City of Monterey Park
Martha Garcia, Director
Finance Department
320 West Newmark Avenue
Monterey Park, CA 91754
(626) 307-1315
[email protected]

Page 151 of 282 ends

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
PR-10 Consultation – 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(I) and 91.315(I) Introduction
Public participation plays a central role in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The City undertook an extensive outreach program to consult and coordinate community residents, local businesses, nonprofit agencies, affordable housing providers, and government agencies regarding the purpose and development of the Consolidated Plan. The outreach program has been summarized in the Executive Summary and Citizen Participation sections of this Consolidated Plan.

Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(I)).

To outreach to various agencies and organizations, the City compiled an outreach list consisting of the following agencies, including:
• Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley
• County of Los Angeles, Department of Health Services
• Family Counseling Services of West San Gabriel Valley • Housing Rights Center
• Los Angeles County Development Authority
• Los Angeles Center for Alcohol & Drug Abuse
• Los Angeles County Public Health Department
• Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority
• Salvation Army
• Adjacent cities, County of Los Angeles, San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, and SCAG.

These agencies were either contacted by phone, email, or notices. Staff made particular efforts to contact specific agencies that provide services to Monterey Park residents and businesses.

Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness The outreach list includes homeless service a gencies in the Los Angeles Continuum of Care Council (LACoC). The Continuum of Care Strategy was consulted to provide information on homelessness and resources available. Several agencies that provide housing and supportive services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless were consulted. These include the Salvation Army Bell Shelter, East San Gabriel Valley Coalition for the Homeless, LAHSA, and L.A. CADA.

Page 152 of 282 ends

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's ar ea in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS The City of Monterey Park does not receive ESG funds as part of its annual entitlement.

Page 153 of 282 ends

2025-2029 Consolidated Plan MONTEREY PARK 9
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 09/30/2021)
Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdiction’s consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol & Drug Abuse (L.A. CADA) Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing
Services - Children
Services - Health
What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homeless Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with children
Homeless Needs - Veterans
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted
and what are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
L.A. CADA was interviewed as part of the public outreach process. The City intends to include the results of stakeholder interviews and other social services to support the ConPlan’s needs assessment findings and strategic planning goals. 2 Agency/Group/Organization Los Angeles County Public Health Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government - County What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Homeless Strategy
Homeless Needs - Families with children Homeless
Needs - Veterans
Homeless Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted,
and what are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
Public Health was interviewed as part of the public outreach process. The City intends to include results of the stakeholder interviews and other social services to support the ConPlan’s needs assessment findings and strategic planning goals. 3 Agency/Group/Organization Los Angeles County Community Development Authority (LACDA) Commission
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government - County What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Homeless Strategy Homeless Needs - Families with children Homeless
Needs - Veterans
Homeless Needs - Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted,
and what are the anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved coordination?
LACDA was interviewed as part of the public outreach
process. The City intends to include the results of the stakeholder interviews and other social services to support the ConPlans’ needs assessment findings and strategic
planning goals.

Page 154 of 282 ends

Monterey Park City CouncilJune 4, 2025

Monterey Park City Council
June 4, 2025