Agenda packet — Monterey Park City Council, July 15, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

City Council of Monterey Park
The City Council Acting on Behalf of the Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency, the Housing Authority, the Monterey Park Financing Authority and the Monterey Park Geologic Hazard Abatement District Agenda

Regular Meeting
Monterey Park City Hall Council Chambers
320 West Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754

Wednesday, July 15, 2026
6:30 PM
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Land Acknowledgment
We would like to acknowledge that the land we inhabit today was once known as Tovangaar, the home of the Gabrieleño-Tongva people. We show our respect to the Gabrieleño-Tongva people, as well as all Indigenous people, past, present, and future, and honor their labor as original caretakers of this land.

We commit to uplifting the Gabrieleño-Tongva people, invite you to acknowledge the history, and join us in caring for this land.

General Information
Documents related to an Agenda item are available to the public in the City Clerk’s Office located at 320 West Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754, during normal business hours.

Visit www.montereypark.ca.gov/agendas for agenda documents, policies, procedures, and instructions for remote participation.

Special Accommodation
Per the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email City Hall at [email protected] or call (626) 307-1359 for reasonable accommodation at least 48 hours before a meeting. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible.

Viewing a Live Broadcast Meeting
• City’s Cable Channel – MPKTV: AT&T U-verse Channel 99 or Charter Communications Channel 182
• City’s Website – http://www.montereypark.ca.gov/133/City-Council-Meeting-Videos • Zoom – https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83333642600, Meeting ID: 833 3364 2600

Public Participation
• In Person – Council Chambers, 320 W. Newmark Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754.

Page 1 of 315 ends

Complete a guest’s speaker card and submit it to the City Clerk. When called upon, approach the podium.
• Zoom – https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83333642600, Meeting ID: 833 3364 2600 To join the speaking queue, use the “raise hand” feature if using a device. Speakers will be unmuted and called on to speak.
• Telephone – Dial 1(669) 444-9171 or 1(253) 205-0468, enter Meeting ID: 833 3364 2600 and press #. To join the speaking queue, press *9 to raise hand and press *6 to unmute when called on to speak.
• Written Public Comment – Accepted up to 24 hours before the meeting by completing an online form at www.montereypark.ca.gov/writtencomm. Written communications are provided to the City Council and filed as part of the City’s administrative record but not read during the council meeting.

Addressing the Council
Pursuant to Rule 4 of Resolution No. 2026-R23, public comments for all agenda items will be taken at the beginning of the meeting, except public hearing which will be taken at the time it will be heard using the same method for each item. The time allotted is determined by the number of speakers in accordance with the format listed below. If desirable, the Mayor and City Council may change the time limits.

Requests to speak will be accepted until the start of the public comment period. Requests to speak on public hearing items will be accepted until the start of the public hearing. No additional requests may be accepted after those times.
• 5 or fewer speakers: 5 minutes each.
• 6–20 speakers: 3 minutes each.
• 21–40 speakers: 2 minutes each.
• 41 or more speakers: 1 minute each.

Live Translation
Meetings may be translated (transcribed or audio) to the language selected. Availability may vary by language and technology platform.
• Wordly – Go to https://attend.wordly.ai/join/ERPR-7201, click on the arrow to select language and then click Attend. Use captions on your device or listen with a headset. • Zoom – Click More (…), select Show Captions, then hover over the Gear icon to choose your language.

Standard of Decorum
Any person addressing the Council who disrupts, disturbs, impedes, or otherwise renders infeasible the meeting’s orderly conduct, who, after a request by the presiding officer, refuses to cease such behavior may be removed from the City Council chambers or remote participation platform.

1. Call to Order
Mayor

2. Flag Salute
The Monterey Park Police Explorers

Page 2 of 315 ends

3. Roll Call
Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang

4. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested

5. Agenda Revisions and Additions

6. Presentation

7. Public Comments

8. Staff Communications

8.A. Public Works

8.B. Police Department

8.C. City Manager's Office

9. Old Business

9.A. Consideration of Designation of Person(s) for Filing an Argument in Favor of the Monterey Park Transient Occupancy Tax Ballot Proposition

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Determining whether to designate person(s) for filing an argument favoring the ballot proposition; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

These actions are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 2100, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because they establish rules and procedures related to government funding mechanisms and election administration; do not involve any commitment to a specific project which could result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and constitute organizational or administrative activities that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Accordingly, the proposition proposed and related actions do not constitute a “project” that requires environmental review (see specifically, 14 CCR § 15378(b)(4-5)).

9.B. Discussion of Short-Term Rentals

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Receive and file this report and the accompanying presentation; and

2. Take any additional related action it considers appropriate.

10. Consent Calendar
All items under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. Specific items may be removed from the Consent Calendar at the request of any member of the City Council for separate consideration.

Page 3 of 315 ends

10.A. BOA Amendment – Fire Station 61

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a first Amendment to Agreement No. 2538- A with Black, O’Dowd & Associates, dba BOA Architecture (“BOA”), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for an additional amount not to exceed $17,200; and

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

10.B. BOA Amendment – Council Chambers

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Second Amendment to Agreement No. 2497-A with Black, O’Dowd & Associates, dba BOA Architecture (“BOA”), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for an additional amount not to exceed $10,100; and

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

10.C. Memorandum of Agreement for the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program and Watershed Management Program for the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area for Fiscal Years 2026 – 2031

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to share costs in implementing the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program and Watershed Management Program for the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area for Fiscal Years 2026 2031; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed action under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). The proposed action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §§ 15262, 15306, 15307, and 15308. The project involves comprehensive data collection efforts to monitor water quality in downstream receiving waters. The data collected will determine whether additional actions are necessary to protect natural resources and the environment.

10.D. Resolution approving FY 2026-2027 City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary Schedule

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution approving the revised FY 2026-2027 City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary Schedule;

2. Approving the Revised Part-Time Classification Salary Ranges; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Page 4 of 315 ends

11. Public Hearing

11.A. Consideration of Costs Resulting from Abating Weed Nuisances and Authorizing Collection via Special Assessment

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing, receiving public comment, closing the public hearing;

2. Adopting the attached Resolution approving the Weed Abatement Clearance Charge List and authorizing collection of such costs through special assessment; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

12. New Business

12.A. Vacant to Vibrant Community Engagement Outreach Report and Recommendations for Consideration and Request for Direction

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the Vacant to Vibrant community engagement outreach report (Attachment 1);

2. Providing direction to craft a concept creating housing overlays throughout the City by amending the Land Use and Urban Design Element to add a land use policy map identifying commercial and industrial areas where such a housing overlay designation may be applied (Attachment 2);

3. Providing direction regarding placing a proposition to effect that amendment on the November 2026 ballot for voter ratification, consistent with the voter-approval requirement established by Measure JJ; and

4. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

13. City Communications (City Council) / Future Agenda Items

14. Closed Session (if Required; City Attorney to Announce)

15. Adjournment

Page 5 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 9.A.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Inez Alvarez, City Manager
Subject: Consideration of Designation of Person(s) for Filing an Argument in Favor of the Monterey Park Transient Occupancy Tax Ballot Proposition

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Determining whether to designate person(s) for filing an argument favoring the ballot proposition; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Executive Summary:

By majority vote, the City Council may authorize one or more of its members to file a written argument regarding the measure and to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments.

The following persons or entities may submit an argument, not exceeding 300 words, for or against the measure:

1. The City Council;

2. Council members authorized by the City Council;

3. An individual voter eligible to vote on the measure (i.e., a registered voter in the city);

Page 6 of 315 ends

4. A bona fide citizens' association; or

5. Any combination of voters and associations.

Each argument must include the printed name(s) and signature(s) of each author. If an organization submits an argument, it must include the organization's name and the printed name and signature of at least one principal officer who is an author of the argument. No more than five signatures may appear with an argument. If more than five authors sign an argument, only the first five signatures will be printed with the voter materials.

Background:

On July 1, 2026, City Council approved the placement of a transient occupancy tax (TOT) on the November 3, 2026, general municipal election ballot. Voters may adopt such proposition with a simple majority. If voter-approved, the proposition would be a general tax and revenue generated from the tax may be used for any general municipal purpose. This proposition would not impose a new tax; rather, it would amend existing taxes, i.e., those already imposed.

The transient occupancy tax (TOT), sometimes called a “hotel tax,” is a charge added to the bill when visitors stay in hotels, motels, or short-term rentals for 30 days or less. The tax is collected by the lodging business from visitors (not local residents) and then remitted to the City to support general municipal services. The City’s TOT rate is currently set at 13%. It is estimated to generate $4.5 million in fiscal year 2026-2027.

The City proposes an increase to its TOT to generate additional revenue for city services. The proposal would:
• Increase the standard TOT rate from 13% to 14%, generating an additional estimated $400,000 annually.
• Increase the TOT rate for short-term rentals (STRs) from 13% to 16%, generating an additional $200,000 annually.

The total estimated additional annual revenue is $600,000. The measure would increase City revenues and provide a more predictable funding source for municipal services and priorities.

The proposition would amend the City’s existing TOT general tax, meaning that revenue derived from the tax can be used for any municipal purpose. With certain exceptions, a general tax can only be considered during a general municipal election.

Because the election will be consolidated with the November 3, 2026, general election, the City Clerk has established deadlines for submitting direct and rebuttal arguments consistent with California law and the election calendar established by the Los Angeles County Registrar- Recorder/County Clerk.

The voter information guide will include one argument in favor of the measure and one argument against the measure. If more than one argument is submitted, the City Clerk must select one for printing. The City Clerk must give preference and priority to arguments in the following order:

Page 7 of 315 ends

1. The City Council, or Council Members authorized by the City Council.

2. The individual voter, bona fide association of citizens, or combination of voters and associations that are bona fide sponsors or proponents of the measure.

3. A bona fide association of citizens.

4. Individual voters eligible to vote on the measure.

If the City Council adopts the provisions in Elections Code § 9285(a) by majority vote before the election, rebuttal arguments may be included on the sample ballot. If the Council adopts provisions of that section, the following rules apply:
• The City Clerk must send copies of the argument supporting the measure to opponents of the measure and must send copies of the argument against the measure to measure proponents. Each side is then entitled to submit a rebuttal argument, not exceeding 250 words.
• Rebuttal arguments must be submitted within 10 days after the deadline for filing direct arguments. Each rebuttal argument must be printed immediately following the direct argument it seeks to rebut.

Timeline and Los Angeles County Election Deadlines
The following timeline applies:
7/16 Last day to file Arguments and City
Attorney's Impartial Analyses
7/26 Last day to file rebuttal arguments
8/5 10-calendar-day public examination
period
8/7 Last day to file a resolution with the
Board of Supervisors and County
elections officials requesting
consolidation for a ballot measure
8/12 Last day to file a resolution with the
County elections official and the
Board of Supervisors to
amend/withdraw a measure
previously submitted for placement
on the ballot
11/3 Election Day

Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A

Fiscal Impact:

Page 8 of 315 ends

There is no fiscal impact to designate person(s) for filing an argument favoring the ballot proposition.

Attachments:

None

Page 9 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 9.B.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Timothy Hou, Director of Community Development
Subject: Discussion of Short-Term Rentals

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Receive and file this report and the accompanying presentation; and

2. Take any additional related action it considers appropriate.

Executive Summary:

In 2020, Monterey Park adopted rules to govern short-term rentals—dwellings, or rooms within them, rented to guests for fewer than 30 consecutive days. These rules, now part of the Monterey Park Municipal Code, are meant to preserve the character of residential neighborhoods, limit the side effects of short-term renting, and give the City tools to address nuisances. Since then, the City has found these rules difficult to enforce. Gaps in permitting, licensing, tax collection, and neighborhood protection have become apparent. Recent legislation provides new tools that the City may wish to utilize to help resolve enforcement challenges.

On July 1, 2026, the Council voted to place a measure on the November 3, 2026 ballot that would raise the City’s transient occupancy tax (TOT) on short-term rentals from 13% to 16%. If a majority of voters approve it, the increase is expected to generate roughly $200,000 in additional revenue each year for City services.

The State enacted the Short-Term Rental Facilitator Act, which strengthens local enforcement.

Among other things, it lets a city obtain the physical address of each rental advertised on a booking platform and gives the city full authority to audit the taxes those rentals owe.

Finally, staff has identified several provisions of the City’s current short-term rental rules that the Council may wish to update – for example, improving definitions, spelling out which types of rentals are prohibited, and setting clearer operating standards.

Page 10 of 315 ends

Background:

The City’s short-term rental regulations took effect in 2020 and are codified in the Monterey Park Municipal Code (MPMC) (Attachment 1). Approximately 290 Monterey Park properties are currently advertised as short-term rentals on platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo, yet only 54 hold the permit required by the MPMC. Ninety-two are paying the TOT, which means that roughly 38 are paying the tax without ever obtaining the required permit.

The TOT applies to guests who stay 30 days or fewer in a hotel, motel, or similar lodging—a category that, under the MPMC, includes short-term rentals. Operators collect the tax from their guests and pass it on to the City. A third-party contractor, HdL Companies, gathers these payments on the City’s behalf and remits them each quarter, adding to the City’s General Fund.

Enforcing these rules is difficult and many operators have not obtained permits. Furthermore, listings usually hide a property’s exact address until a guest confirms a booking, leaving the City with limited means to identify and monitor properties that are out of compliance.

What the Municipal Code Currently Requires

Anyone who operates a short-term rental in Monterey Park must first obtain a permit from the Community Development Director, and every advertisement must display that permit number.

An application must be filed by an individual and include the operator’s contact information, proof of homeowner’s or renter’s insurance, a certificate showing that the operator is registered to collect the transient occupancy tax, a $1,500 surety bond, and a written statement confirming that neighbors within 200 feet were notified at least 30 days beforehand.

The Director reviews each application and must issue a permit when the application is complete, no grounds for denial exist, and the applicant accepts the permit in writing.

Every permit must include a nuisance response plan. The plan names a responsible person who can be reached by phone at all times, who must return a neighbor’s complaint call within 30 minutes and take prompt corrective action. The plan also sets the maximum number of overnight guests and the parking available, and it must be mailed to every property within 200 feet of the rental.

Operators must also meet ongoing performance standards. The property must comply with all fire, building, and safety codes. A responsible adult must be identified for each stay, and the operator must keep that person’s identification and a signed acknowledgment of responsibility.

Overnight occupancy is capped at two guests, plus up to two more per bedroom, and the number of vehicles may not exceed the available off-street parking. Every rental agreement must spell out these limits, along with refuse rules, noise regulations, a prohibition on loud parties, and around-the-clock contact information. Each year, operators must confirm to the City that they remain in compliance.

The MPMC also imposes tax duties. Every lodging operator, including short-term rental hosts, must register with the City, collect the TOT from guests, and file a return with payment each calendar quarter. The tax is currently 13% of the rent charged. Operators must keep records for three years, and late or fraudulent payments carry escalating penalties and interest.

Page 11 of 315 ends

Finally, the City enforces these rules through the permit itself. The Director may add conditions to a permit, deny it, or revoke it when an operator or guest breaks the rules, and a public-safety officer may suspend a permit immediately in an emergency. An operator who disagrees with a decision may ask the City Manager to review it, and the City Manager’s decision is final.

Recent Changes in State Law

Recent state legislation has given cities new tools to regulate short-term rentals. The State’s Short-Term Rental Facilitator Act now allows a city to require booking platforms to report the physical address of every short-term rental they advertise within its borders, and it authorizes fines when a platform fails to file that information. Platforms must also display each rental’s local permit or tax-registration number in the listing itself. In addition, the law gives cities full authority to audit the transient occupancy taxes collected on these rentals. Separately, state housing law now prohibits renting a junior accessory dwelling unit as a short-term rental. To make use of the new enforcement authority, the City would need to update its short-term rental rules to match it.

Provisions the Council May Wish to Update
Several parts of the MPMC may be updated to improve definitions, name the types of rentals that are prohibited, and set clearer operating standards. The table below summarizes these provisions and how the rules treat each one today.

Page 12 of 315 ends

How Monterey Park Compares to Other Cities

To learn from other communities, staff reviewed the short-term rental rules of several nearby and comparable cities. The table below shows how Monterey Park’s current approach compares on the major provisions.

Page 13 of 315 ends

Several nearby San Gabriel Valley cities—including Rosemead, San Gabriel, and Temple City—have banned short-term rentals altogether. Their stated reasons include a lack of staff to enforce regulations and concerns about noise and safety when unfamiliar guests stay in residential neighborhoods.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This discussion supports the City’s Strategic Plan goals to “Evaluate and Refine Cost Recovery Strategies to Optimize City Resources” and to “Strengthen Our Local Economy and Enhance Housing Opportunities.” Updating the short-term rental framework—covering permitting, licensing, and tax compliance—would advance both goals while protecting residential neighborhoods.

Page 14 of 315 ends

Fiscal Impact:

There are no identifiable fiscal impacts associated with this item.

Attachments:

1. Monterey Park Municipal Code - Short Term Rental Regulations

Page 15 of 315 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Monterey Park Municipal Code –
Short-Term Rental Regulations

Page 16 of 315 ends

§ 21.09.010. Purpose.

This chapter is adopted in accordance with California Constitution Article XI, Section 7 and Civil Procedure Code Section 731, including any successor statutes, for the purpose of regulating short-term rentals and identifying public nuisances. Adopting this chapter is a municipal affair and will protect public health, safety, and welfare by ensuring that the characteristics of rental neighborhoods are preserved; reducing the secondary effects that may result from permissible short-term rentals; proactively combating public nuisances; and imposing criminal and civil penalties upon persons violating this chapter. (Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.020. Definitions.

Unless the contrary is stated or clearly appears from the context, the following definitions will govern the construction of the words and phrases used in this chapter. "Director" means, unless otherwise designated by the City Manager, the City Planner. "Nuisance response plan" means a written plan designed to mitigate the secondary effects of allowing short-term rentals within residential neighborhoods as described in this chapter.
"Owner" means the person or persons holding fee title or leasing a dwelling unit operated and used as a short-term rental, or the agents of any such persons. "Responsible person" has the same meaning as set forth in Section 4.20.030 of this code. "Short-term rental" means a dwelling unit other than a unit located in a hotel or motel that is rented to a person or persons for a period shorter than thirty consecutive days. (Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.030. Prohibitions.

The following constitute a violation of this chapter and are unlawful:
(A) For any person to own, operate, or maintain a short-term rental without a valid permit issued pursuant to this chapter.
(B) For any person to rent, offer to rent, or advertise for rent a short-term rental to another person without a valid permit issued pursuant to this chapter. (C) For any person to offer to rent or advertise for rent a short-term rental without including in the offer or advertisement the permit number applicable to the property substantially in the form of "Monterey Park Permit No. __________." The permit number must be printed in the same size type as the largest type used in the main body of the offer or advertisement.
(D) Failure of an owner to respond to a nuisance complaint arising out of the occupancy and use of the short-term rental by a tenant, or the tenant's visitors or guests in the manner and within the time required by a nuisance response plan. (E) Failure of an owner to keep a nuisance response plan on file with the Director City of Monterey Park, CA
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 17 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.040. Administration by Director.

The Director will receive applications; issue and revoke permits; interpret; and otherwise implement this chapter. The Director may promulgate administrative policies and procedures to implement this chapter.
(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.050. Notices.
(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.060. Fees.

Except as otherwise provided by applicable law, all fees applicable to this chapter will be established by City Council resolution.
(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.070. Permit Application—Form and Content.
containing the name of the current responsible person for responding to a nuisance complaint.
(F) Failure of an owner to keep a valid surety bond on file with the Director during the effective term of the permit.
(G) Failure of any person to comply with or cause compliance with any performance standard listed in this chapter.
(A) Where this chapter require that an applicant/permittee be provided notice, such notice will be served when personally delivered to such applicant/permittee; when electronically mailed to the last known email address; or when deposited in the first class U.S. Mail, addressed to such applicant/permittee at the applicant/permittee's last known address.
(B) Unless otherwise provided, written notification to a permittee/applicant of a permit decision will state with particularity the basis for such decision. (C) Where this chapter requires that notice be provided to surrounding properties, such notice must be in writing and be provided in person; by mail; or other physical means approved by the Director, e.g., by door hangers. Electronic mail is not acceptable.
(D) Failure to receive actual notice does not invalidate actions taken pursuant to this chapter including, without limitation, the validity of a permit. (A) Permit applications will be filed by a natural person and be accompanied by an application fee.
(B) Permit applications will be in a form prescribed by the Director and will contain the following information:

City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.030 § 21.09.070
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 18 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.080. Action on Permit Application—Permit Issuance. (Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.090. Action on Permit Application—Permit Denial.

A permit may be denied for the following reasons:
(1) The name, mailing address, and daytime and evening telephone numbers of the person filing the application;
(2) A nuisance response plan containing the information required by this chapter; (3) A transient occupancy registration certificate issued by the Management Resources Director pursuant to this code;
(4) Proof of homeowner's or renter's insurance for the short-term rental; (5) A surety bond in the amount of $1,500 in a form required by this chapter or, in unusual circumstances, as approved by the City Attorney; (6) A written declaration affirming that, at least 30 days before filing an application, occupants of all residences and businesses located within 200 feet from the proposed short-term rental were notified of the proposed permit and were informed in writing in a form acceptable to the City of the proposed use and the contact information with the City.
(7) In addition to the information required by this section, applications for all permits will include such supplemental information which the Director may find reasonably necessary.
(A) The Director must issue a permit if:
(1) The application was complete in accordance with this chapter; (2) There are no grounds for denying the permit; and
(3) Applicant accepts the permit approval or conditional approval in writing. (B) Use of any permit issued pursuant to this chapter will conform to the general permit conditions of this chapter and, if applicable, special permit conditions reasonably deemed necessary by the Director to protect public, safety or welfare. Such special conditions may include, without limitation, conditions for controlling pedestrian or vehicle traffic and for protecting public or private property. (C) A permit is not valid until the Director receives the applicant's written acceptance in accordance with this chapter.
(A) The application is incomplete;
(B) The applicant failed to provide reasonable supplemental application information requested by the Director;
City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.070 § 21.09.090
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 19 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.100. General Permit Conditions.
(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.110. Nuisance Response Plans.
(C) Information submitted by the applicant is materially false; (D) A permit may be denied if a short-term rental permit issued to the applicant or for the property was suspended or revoked in the previous 24 months. (A) A permit does not create a property interest and is personal to the permittee. (B) Permittees must execute a hold harmless agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney which will, in part, indemnify City, its officers, employees, and agents, from any liability arising from permittee's event in a form approved by the City Attorney's office. Such agreement must be filed with the Director before a permit is issued.
(C) Permittee must provide evidence to the Director that the short-term rental is insured with valid home-owners or renter's insurance.
(D) Every permit must specify the maximum number of overnight occupants allowed at the short-term rental and the maximum number of vehicles associated with the overnight occupancy of the short-term rental which can be parked at the property.

Notice of the permit approval must be provided to everyone who files a written request for such notice.
(E) Every permit will incorporate the approved nuisance response plan. (F) Every permit will incorporate the performance standards. (G) The validity of every permit is contingent upon the effectiveness of the surety bond required by this chapter.
(A) Each nuisance response plan must be in a form required by the Director and, at a minimum, contain the following information:
(1) The mailing address and telephone number of the owner of the residential dwelling unit or units to be used as a short-term rental pursuant to the permit. (2) The name, address and telephone number of the responsible person who will be available by telephone, and who will be responsible for promptly responding to or causing a prompt response to a nuisance complaint arising out of the occupancy or use of the short-term rental(s) by tenants, their visitors and/or their guests. For the purposes of this chapter, a return telephone call to a complainant within 30 minutes of the initial complaint is "prompt." (3) The manner of responding to or causing a response to a nuisance complaint including, without limitation, how the complainant or complainants will be notified of the response and the method of documenting prompt responses and City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.090 § 21.09.110
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 20 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.120. Performance Standards.

Each owner, and each tenant or occupant of a short-term rental, must comply with or cause compliance with these performance standards:
timely corrective action.
(4) The manner of assuring timely corrective action to remedy the conditions that caused the nuisance complaint. For the purposes of this chapter, "timely corrective action" includes, at least, a telephone call to the primary adult occupant of the short-term rental within 30 minutes of the initial nuisance complaint.
(5) The proposed maximum number of overnight occupants, with supporting documentation identifying unusual size, interior layout, parking or other physical characteristics, if any, that support a request for occupancy greater than two persons per bedroom.
(6) The number of off-street parking spaces and number of bedrooms available at the short-term rental.
(B) At any time, the owner may change the content of the nuisance response plan approved as part of the permit by filing an amended nuisance response plan with the Director. Such amended nuisance response plan must contain the information and be in the form required by this chapter and be accompanied by an amended response plan fee.
(C) Promptly after a permit is issued, or an amended nuisance response plan is approved, the Director will require the permittee to provide proof that the nuisance response plan was mailed by first class mail addressed to the owner or occupant of every property, any part of which is located within a 200 foot radius of the property that is to be used and occupied as a short-term rental, pursuant to such permit. (A) The owner must ensure that the short-term rental complies with all applicable codes regarding fire, building and safety, and all other applicable laws. (B) The owner must require the primary overnight and daytime occupant of the short- term rental to be an adult 18 years of age or older. This adult must provide a telephone number to the owner and be accessible to the owner by telephone at all times.
(C) Before occupancy, the owner must obtain the name, address, and a copy of the government issued identification of the primary adult occupant of the short-term rental. The owner must require that adult to sign a formal acknowledgement that he or she is legally responsible for compliance of all occupants of the short-term rental or their guests with all provisions of this chapter. This information must be provided by the responsible person identified in the nuisance response plan upon request of any police officer or employee of the City authorized to enforce this code or applicable law.

City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.110 § 21.09.120
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 21 of 315 ends

(D) The owner must limit overnight occupancy of the short-term rental to a specific number of occupants, with the maximum number of overnight occupants being two persons within each short-term rental plus a number that does not exceed two persons per bedroom within each short-term rental.
(E) The owner must limit the number of vehicles associated with the overnight occupancy of the short-term rental to a specific number of vehicles, with the maximum number of vehicles being the number of offstreet parking spaces available at the property.
(F) Trash and refuse cannot be left stored within public view, except in proper containers for the purpose of collection on scheduled trash collection days. The owner of the short-term rental must provide sufficient trash collection containers and service to meet the demand of the occupants.
(G) Each lease or rental agreement for a short-term rental must include the following terms, notifications and disclosures, which terms will also be posted in a conspicuous location inside the unit:
(1) The maximum number of overnight occupants and day use visitors that are permitted.
(2) The maximum number of vehicles that overnight occupants may park at the short-term rental.
(3) Notification that on-street parking is extremely limited in some areas of the City.
(4) The trash pick-up day and applicable rules and regulations pertaining to leaving or storing trash or refuse on the exterior of the property. (5) Notification that the occupant may be cited or fined by the City and/or immediately evicted by the owner pursuant to applicable law, in addition to any other remedies available at law, for violating any other provisions of this code.
(6) Notification that failure to conform to the occupancy requirements of the short-term rental is unlawful.
(7) Notification that amplified sound, including radios, televisions and other electronic devices are subject to the noise regulations in this code. (8) A prohibition on illegal loud parties, along with notification of the City's right to recover the costs of special enforcement needed to address certain loud parties.
(9) The name of the managing agency, agent, rental manager, local contact person, or owner of the unit, and a telephone number at which that party may be reached at all times.
(10) A copy of the "Good Neighbor Guidelines" which may from time to time be City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.120 § 21.09.120
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 22 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.130. Surety Bonds.
prepared by the Director. These guidelines may include location-specific information, such as neighborhood quiet hours, local speed limits and the prohibition of fireworks.
(11) Notification that the property is part of the City of Monterey Park's Short-Term Rental Program.
(12) A copy of this chapter as it may be amended from time to time. (13) Upon receiving a nuisance complaint or upon notification of an allegation that any occupant and/or guest of the short-term rental created unreasonable noise or disturbances, engaged in disorderly conduct, or committed violations of this code or any applicable law, the owner must promptly respond and take timely corrective action to prevent a recurrence of such conduct by those occupants or guests. Failure of the owner to respond promptly and/or to take timely corrective action regarding the condition, operation, or conduct of occupants of the short-term rental is a violation of this chapter. An owner is not required or authorized to act as a peace officer or to intervene in situations that pose a risk to personal safety. The owner, or his or her agent, must maintain records of the name, violation, date, and time of each complaint, disturbance, response and corrective action.
(14) The owner must cause a copy of the nuisance response plan to be posted in a conspicuous place within the property.
(15) The owner must annually provide to Director written confirmation of compliance with all elements of the performance standards and the approved nuisance response plan and confirming that the nuisance response plan is current and accurate.
(16) The performance standards may be modified by the Director upon request of the owner based upon site-specific circumstances for the purpose of allowing reasonable accommodation of a short-term rental occupant as may be required by applicable disability laws. All requests must be in writing and identify how the strict application of the standard conditions creates an unreasonable hardship to a property such that, if the requirement is not modified, reasonable use of the property for a short-term rental would not be allowed. (A) Each surety bond accompanying an application for a permit required by this chapter must be issued by a surety licensed to do business in the State of California that has an A.M. Best Financial Strength Rating of at least "A-"; must name the City as the bond oblige; and be conditioned on the payment of any administrative fine assessed in the manner provided for by this code if:
(1) The administrative fine was assessed either against the permittee or against any tenant or other person occupying or using the short-term rental operated City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.120 § 21.09.130
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 23 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.140. Subsequent Conditions.
(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.150. Administrative Review.
pursuant to such permit; and
(2) Arose out of a violation of this chapter, or the occupancy or use of such short- term rental in a manner that violated any provision of this code. (B) At any time after a permit is issued, the permittee may file a substitute surety bond with the Director issued by a surety that meets the requirements of this section.

Upon determining that such substitute bond conforms to such requirements, the Director will return the bond being replaced by the substitute surety bond to the permittee.
(C) Where the owner of property used and occupied as a short-term rental pursuant to a permit approved and issued in the manner provided for by this chapter determines to cease such use, the property owner must promptly cause a notice of such determination to be filed with the Director. Within 30 days following confirmation that there are no pending enforcement actions arising from violations of this chapter, the Director will return the surety bond provided to the City to the permittee.
(A) The Director may condition previously issued permits upon learning or discovering facts not previously disclosed or reasonably discoverable. (B) Except where otherwise provided, a permittee may seek review of imposition of subsequent conditions to the Director as provided in this chapter. (A) Except as otherwise provided, an applicant may request administrative review of the Director's decision pursuant to this chapter.
(B) Except as otherwise provided, a request for review must be commenced within five days from the date on which written notice of the Director's decision is served on the applicant/permittee.
(C) If request is untimely, the Director may, nevertheless, extend the time for commencing such review for good cause shown.
(D) A request for administrative review will be on a form provided by the Director and contain the following information:
(1) The name, address and telephone number of the person making the request; (2) A description of the decision, determination or order which is the subject of the review, and the date such decision, determination or order was made or issued;
(3) A brief description of all grounds for making the request; and City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.130 § 21.09.150
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 24 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.160. Permit Revocation.
(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
§ 21.09.170. Emergency Suspension.

The Director and any sworn public safety officer may temporarily suspend a permit whenever there is an emergency that requires such action to protect public safety. Should this occur, the permittee and tenants of a short-term rental will immediately comply with the suspending officer's instructions. The Director will immediately attempt to notify the applicant orally and will notify the applicant and the City Manager in writing, within 24 hours after the suspension, citing with particularity the facts and the reasons for the suspension.
(4) Such other information as may be required by the Director. (E) Upon request for administrative review being filed, the Director will provide a copy of the notice to the City Manager within two business days. (F) Upon receiving a request for review from the Director, the City Manager will review the request and, within 10 business days of receiving the request notice, provide the appellant with a written notification that:
(1) The Director's decision is affirmed;
(2) The Director's decision is modified. Any notification to the requestor must set forth any modifications of the Director's decision;
(3) The Director's decision is reversed and a permit is issued or issued without special conditions.
(G) The City Manager may, but is not required to, conduct a hearing at a time and place determined at the City Manager's sole discretion.
(H) The City Manager's decision is final. There is no right to appeal to the City Council. (A) The Director will revoke a permit upon learning or discovering facts requiring permit denial not previously disclosed or reasonably discoverable. (B) The Director may revoke a permit when the permittee or event violates the permit's terms and conditions, or when tenants of a short-term rental violate applicable laws or regulations.
(C) A permittee is entitled to appeal the Director's decision in accordance with the time limits set forth for administrative reviews in this chapter. (D) Any notification of action, whether oral or written, will describe with particularity the facts and the reasons for the decision.
(E) The City Manager's decision is a final determination. There is no right of City Council appeal.

City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.150 § 21.09.170
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 25 of 315 ends

(Ord. 2200 § 2, 2020)
City of Monterey Park, CA
§ 21.09.170 § 21.09.170
Downloaded from https://ecode360.com/MO4971 on 2026-07-08

Page 26 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.A.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: BOA Amendment – Fire Station 61

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a first Amendment to Agreement No. 2538-A with Black, O’Dowd & Associates, dba BOA Architecture (“BOA”), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for an additional amount not to exceed $17,200; and

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The City Council, on March 4, 2026, awarded BOA a professional service agreement for the preparation of plans, specifications and engineer’s estimates (“PS&E”) for Fire Station 61 Remodeling Project (the “Project”).

During design, the City determined that additional services are necessary to incorporate ADA- related improvements that were not initially incorporated into the Project’s original scope of work. BOA provided a proposal for the additional scope in the amount of $17,200. Approval of the proposed amendment would increase the contract to a total amount not to exceed $123,900.

Background:

Fire Station 61 was constructed in the early 1970s and is over 50 years old. Due to its age, Station 61 is beginning to exceed its useful life. The living quarters are reminiscent of the time in which they were constructed, with communal showers and dorms. The City of Monterey Park was notified in November 2023 that United States Senator Alex Padilla had secured $1.5 million in federal funding for upgrades at Fire Station 61. The funding will be used to upgrade the living quarters at Fire Station 61.

Page 27 of 315 ends

The City Council, on March 4, 2026, awarded BOA Architecture a professional service agreement for the preparation of PS&E for Fire Station 61 Remodeling.

During design, the City determined that additional services are necessary to incorporate ADA- related improvements that were not initially incorporated into the Project’s original scope of work. Specifically, ADA compliance requires an accessible restroom on the first floor and a second stair for the second floor. BOA submitted a proposal for the additional services in the amount of $17,200.

The Director of Public Works recommends an amendment to Agreement 2538-A with BOA by an additional amount of $17,200.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This Project meets the City's goal to maintain, build and modernize infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our City and community as it aims to continue public facility improvements and provide multiple forms of usage of the Council Chambers.

Fiscal Impact:

The contract cost will not exceed $123,900, and such funds are budgeted as part of Capital Improvement Project (“CIP”) 95048.

Attachments:

1. BOA Architecture Proposal

Page 28 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 15, 2026

ATTACHMENT 1
BOA Architecture Proposal, June 25, 2026

Page 29 of 315 ends

512 Redondo Avenue
Long Beach, CA 90814
Telephone: 562-912-7900

www.boaarchitecture.com

Mr. Ziad Mazboudi, PE June 25, 2026
City of Monterey Park

Re: Extra Fee for Architecture-Engineering Service s for Remodel of Monterey Park Fire Station, ADA Compliance + 2 nd Stair

Based on our meeting with the City Building Officia l and your directive (as you have stated in recent virtual meetings), we are requesting an Extra Fee to design an accessible restroom on the first floor and add a 2 nd
stair for the second floor. As you know, the current Fire Station 61 does not have an elevator to access the second floor, and there is only one exit stair that serves the second floor. Per the Building Official, to avoid installation of an elevator, there must be “equival ent facilitation” on both the first floor and the s econd floors. For ADA compliance, it seems easiest to re trofit the first-floor existing dorm, kitchenette, bathroom, ramp, and parking stall, for accessibility, rather than installing a new elevator. To resolve the lac k of a 2 nd exit stair for the second floor, we proposal adding the 2 nd stair by exiting onto the roof and down a new steel exterior stair along the east side of the app aratus bay. See the attached sketches for their lo cations.

Since these items were not part of our original Sco pe of Work, we are requesting an Extra Fee for this additional scope. Our proposed additional Scope of Work is outlined below, and our itemized Extra Fee spreadsheet is attached for your review.

Scope of Work

1. Provide PSE (plans, specs, estimate) to avoid in stallation of a new elevator to the second floor, we will design for “equivalent facilitation” for th e first floor. We propose retrofitting the first-f loor existing dorm, kitchenette, bathroom, ramp, and par king stall, for accessibility. And to resolve the lack of a 2
nd exit stair for the second floor, we propose adding the 2 nd stair by exiting onto the roof and down a new steel exterior along the ea st side of the apparatus bay. See the attached sketches for their proposed locations

2. Provide site visit(s) to verify the existing con ditions

3. Provide structural, mechanical, electrical, plum bing, and engineering

4. Provide sufficient Construction Documents (drawi ngs and specs) to secure a building permit approval and public bidding to general contractors.

5. Attend meetings and provide overall project coor dination with you, our sub-consultant engineers, the Client, to expedite this additional Scope of Work.

6. Respond to RFI’s from the Contractor during the construction phase of this project.

Per the attached fee spreadsheet, we are requesting an Extra Fee of $17,200 for this additional work.

When approved, BOA’s overall project design fee wil l now be $106,700 Original Fee + $17,200 Extra Fee for ADA Compliance & 2nd Stair = $123,900 total Overall Fee. Please review and let us know if this me ets your approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (310) 480-7730 cell.

BOA Architecture

Edward Lok Ng, Architect, LEED AP, President

Page 30 of 315 ends

EXTRA FEE PROPOSAL
Architectural-Engineering Services for:

Monterey Park Fire Station 6, ADA Compliance + 2nd Stair date: June 25, 2026 Construction Cost Estimate: To Be Determined prepared by: BOA, Edward Lok Ng, Architect prepared for: City of Monterey Park, Ziad Mazboudi

PERSON HRS UNIT RATE COST TOTAL

PRE-DESIGN
kick-off meeting to verify scope of work,obtain as-built dwgs. PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0 project management, confirm cost/work plan & prep field work PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300 site assessment, as-built measurements & photos Sr.Tech 5 hrs 110 550 CADD-3D Sr.Tech 5 hrs 110 550
1,400

ARCHITECTURAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN
preliminary design; 2 floor plan options, refine 1 option PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300 CADD-3D drawings Sr.Tech 5 hrs 110 550
3-D color renderings Sr.Tech 0 hrs 110 0
project management PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
construction cost estimate PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
meeting or coordination with Client PM-Arch 3 hrs 150 450 1,300
ENGINEERING and EXPENSES
structural engineering 3,000
mechanical, new exhaust fan, ducts, as needed 1,000
plumbing 1,000
electrical 1,000
lighting designer 0
AV consultant 0
acoustical engineering 0
civil engineering 0
expenses for blueprints, photocopies, mailing, misc. 0
6,000

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS refine preliminary design PM-Arch 3 hrs 150 450
CADD-3D modeling of construction document drawings Sr.Tech 30 hrs 110 3,300 project management, design development,coord. w engineers PM-Arch 3 hrs 150 450 meeting or coordination with Client PM-Arch 3 hrs 150 450 specifications in CSI format PM-Arch 4 hrs 150 600
construction cost estimate PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300
quality control PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300
City bldg-safety dept. and client submittal&corrections Sr.Tech 5 hrs 110 550 6,400

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
pre-bid meeting PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
bidding RFI's PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
pre-construction meeting PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
project management, RFI & submittal response PM-Arch 10 hrs 150 1,500 CADD-3D modeling and record drawings Sr.Tech 0 hrs 110 0 construction site meetings, punchlist meeting PM-Arch 4 hrs 150 600 2,100
TOTAL $17,200

Page 31 of 315 ends

MONTEREY PARK
FIRE STATION 61
S MCPHERRIN AVE.

W NEWMARK AVE.

NEW ADA

ARCHITECTURE

INTERIORS

PLANNING
512 REDONDO AVE. LONG BEACH, CA 90814 TEL. 562-912-7900 MONTEREY PARK FIRE STATION 61 2ND

FLOOR RENOVATION
350 W Newmark Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754
N
SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"1 SITE PLAN - ARCHITECTURAL

Page 32 of 315 ends

UP
JAN

APPARATUS BAY

WORKSHOP

EQUIPMENT STORAGE
GARAGE
(N) OFFICE(N) ADA DORM
OFFICE
LOBBY

CHIEF'S OFFICE
DORM

RESTROOM
(N) ADA
RR
NEW

KITCHENETTE
(E) 4 CABINETS
(N) 2 HANDRAILS

ARCHITECTURE

INTERIORS

PLANNING
512 REDONDO AVE. LONG BEACH, CA 90814 TEL. 562-912-7900 MONTEREY PARK FIRE STATION 61 2ND

FLOOR RENOVATION
350 W Newmark Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 OPTION E.1 FIRST FLOOR
N

Page 33 of 315 ends

DN
DN
LOUNGE
DORM
(1)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(2)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(3)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(4)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(5)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(6)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(7)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(8)
(98)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(9)
(99)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(10)
(95)

7.5X12.5
DORM
(11)
(100)
9X12.5
DORM
(12)
(100)
9X12.5
UP

KITCHEN
DINING
STAIR
PANTRY
UTIL.

JAN
TV

STORAGE

COFFEE BAR
WH
WH
DR W
SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"1 OPTION E.1 (STAIR)

ARCHITECTURE

INTERIORS

PLANNING
512 REDONDO AVE. LONG BEACH, CA 90814 TEL. 562-912-7900 MONTEREY PARK FIRE STATION 61 2ND

FLOOR RENOVATION
350 W Newmark Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754
N

Page 34 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.B.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: BOA Amendment – Council Chambers

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Second Amendment to Agreement No. 2497- A with Black, O’Dowd & Associates, dba BOA Architecture (“BOA”), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for an additional amount not to exceed $10,100; and

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The City Council, on July 16, 2025, awarded BOA Architecture a professional service agreement for the preparation of plans, specifications and engineer’s estimates (“PS&E”) for City Hall Council Chamber and restroom remodeling project (the “Project”).

BOA’s original scope of work was limited to the Council Chambers. The first amendment added services for rear conference room, including ADA improvements to the rear restroom, relocation of the AV room, and additional safety measures. During design, the City determined that the existing skylights at the rear of the Council Chambers should be replaced with a permanent roof assembly. Amendment No. 2 would add the design services necessary to incorporate those improvements into the Project's construction documents.

BOA submitted a proposal for the additional services in the amount of $10,100. Approval of the proposed amendment would increase the contract to an amount not to exceed $164,400.

Background:

The City Hall and its Council Chambers were constructed almost 50 years ago. Over the years, the City has made improvements to meet the audio-visual and technological needs of the time.

Page 35 of 315 ends

The City Council, on July 16, 2025, awarded BOA a professional service agreement for the preparation of PS&E for the Project.

During design, the City determined that the existing skylights at the rear of the Council Chambers had been permanently blocked off and no longer functioned as originally designed.

Because the skylights contribute to energy loss, the City determined they should be removed and replaced with a permanent roof assembly.

BOA submitted provided a proposal for the additional services in the amount of $10,100.

The Director of Public Works recommends an amendment to Agreement 2497-A with BOA for an additional amount not to exceed $10,100.

Strategic Plan Goal:

Fiscal Impact:

The contract cost will not exceed $164,400, and such funds are budgeted as part of Capital Improvement Project (“CIP”) 95065.

Attachments:

1. BOA Architecture Proposal

Page 36 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 15, 2026

ATTACHMENT 1
BOA Architecture Proposal, June 25, 2026

Page 37 of 315 ends

1511 Cota Avenue
Long Beach, CA 90813
Telephone: 562-912-7900
Telephone: 310-832-2681

www.boaarchitecture.com

Mr. Ziad Mazboudi, PE June 19, 2026
City of Monterey Park

Re: Extra Fee for Architecture-Engineering Service s for Remodel of Monterey Park City Council Chamber to Convert Skylights to Roof

Based on your request (as you have stated in recent virtual meetings) to convert the existing skylight s in the City Council Chamber to a roof, and incorporate d into our current Construction Documents, we are requesting an Extra Fee for this additional scope. The existing skylights are currently located direc tly above and hidden by a dropped ceiling. Please note that this scope was not included in our original fee/scope proposal. Converting the skylights to a roof will save on future HVAC cooling energy cost, mitigate unwanted light-leaks into the Council Cham bers, and resolve skylights leaks. Our proposed Scope of Work for this additional scope is outlined below, and our itemized Extra Fee spreadsheet is attached for your review.

Scope of Work

1. Provide PSE (plans, specs, estimate) to convert existing skylights in the City Council Chamber to a roof. The new roofing will match the existing standing seam metal roofing. The standing seam will also be install on the side wall that face the park.

2. Provide site visit(s) to verify the existing con ditions

3. Provide insulation at the roof and exterior wall for energy Code compliance.

4. Provide structural engineering

5. Provide sufficient Construction Documents (drawi ngs and specs) to secure a building permit approval and public bidding to general contractors.

6. Attend meetings and provide overall project coor dination with you, our sub-consultant engineers, the Client, to expedite the Scope of Work.

7. Respond to RFI’s from the Contractor during the construction phase of this project.

Per the attached fee spreadsheet, we are requesting an Extra Fee of $10,100 for this additional work.

When approved, BOA’s overall project design fee wil l now be $139,300 Original Fee + $15,000 Extra Fee for Council conference room + $10,100 to convert sk ylights to roof = $164,400 total Overall Fee. Plea se review and let us know if this meets your approval. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (310) 480-7730 cell.

BOA Architecture

Edward Lok Ng, Architect, LEED AP, President

Page 38 of 315 ends

EXTRA FEE PROPOSAL
Architectural-Engineering Services for:

Monterey Park City Council Chamber, Convert Skylights to Roof date: June 19, 2026 Construction Cost Estimate: To Be Determined prepared by: BOA, Edward Lok Ng, Architect prepared for: City of Monterey Park, Ziad Mazboudi

PERSON HRS UNIT RATE COST TOTAL

ARCHITECTURAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN
preliminary design; 3 floor plan options, refine 1 option PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300 CADD-3D drawings Sr.Tech 5 hrs 110 550
3-D color renderings Sr.Tech 0 hrs 110 0
project management PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
construction cost estimate PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
meeting or coordination with Client PM-Arch 3 hrs 150 450 1,300
ENGINEERING and EXPENSES
structural engineering 2,500
mechanical, new HVAC equipment, provide new ducts 0
plumbing 0
electrical 0
lighting designer 0
AV consultant 0
acoustical engineering 0
civil engineering 0
expenses for blueprints, photocopies, mailing, misc. 0
2,500

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS refine preliminary design PM-Arch 1 hrs 150 150
CADD-3D modeling of construction document drawings Sr.Tech 20 hrs 110 2,200 project management, design development,coord. w engineers PM-Arch 3 hrs 150 450 meeting or coordination with Client PM-Arch 3 hrs 150 450 specifications in CSI format PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300
construction cost estimate PM-Arch 1 hrs 150 150
quality control PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300
City bldg-safety dept. and client submittal&corrections Sr.Tech 0 hrs 110 0 4,000

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
pre-bid meeting PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
bidding RFI's PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
pre-construction meeting PM-Arch 0 hrs 150 0
project management, RFI & submittal response PM-Arch 4 hrs 150 600 CADD-3D modeling and record drawings Sr.Tech 0 hrs 110 0 construction site meetings, punchlist meeting PM-Arch 2 hrs 150 300 900
TOTAL $10,100

Page 39 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.C.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Memorandum of Agreement for the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program and Watershed Management Program for the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area for Fiscal Years 2026 – 2031

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Executive Summary:

The City participates in the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group (ULAR WMG), a collaborative group consisting of nineteen jurisdictions working together to comply with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements established by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board). The ULAR WMG jointly implements the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) and Watershed Management Program (WMP) required under the MS4 Permit.

The existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) governing implementation of the CIMP and WMP expires on June 30, 2026. The proposed MOA would establish an initial three-year agreement term beginning July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029, with up to two additional,

Page 40 of 315 ends

optional one-year extensions upon mutual agreement of the participating agencies.

The proposed MOA provides for continued regional coordination, monitoring, reporting, and compliance planning activities required under the MS4 permit. Participation in the regional program allows the City to share costs and technical resources with neighboring jurisdictions, resulting in significant cost savings compared to independently implementing these highly technical MS4 requirements.

Background:

On November 6, 2013, the City Council approved Monterey Park’s participation in the City of Los Angeles’ collaborative effort to develop the CIMP and WMP to comply with the MS4 Permit adopted by the Regional Board.

The ULAR WMG includes the following participating jurisdictions:

The Regional Board approved the original CIMP on November 18, 2015, and approved the original WMP on April 20, 2016.

The ULAR WMG includes Monterey Park along with neighboring jurisdictions that collectively implement regional storm water monitoring, reporting, and watershed management activities required under the MS4 permit. Participation in the ULAR WMG allows the City to share technical resources and reduce costs associated with these highly technical regulatory requirements.

On May 17, 2023, the City Council approved the current three-year MOA for Fiscal Years 2024 – 2026 in the amount of $80,045. The proposed new MOA for Fiscal Years 2026 – 2029 establishes the City’s estimated total cost share at $78,594 over the initial three-year term.

Under the CIMP, participating agencies conduct installation, maintenance, and monitoring of sampling sites to determine levels of contamination within the watershed area. The WMP includes reporting, watershed planning, and compliance coordination activities required under the MS4 Permit.

The ULAR WMG also coordinates with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) to provide administrative support and oversee implementation of the MOA.

Monterey Park continues to coordinate with John L. Hunter & Associates (JLHA) for technical assistance and MS4 permit compliance support related to the CIMP and WMP.

Page 41 of 315 ends

Strategic Plan Goal:

The proposed action supports the City’s objective to enhance water infrastructure by maintaining regulatory compliance, protecting water quality within the watershed, and supporting long-term planning and management of the City’s stormwater resources.

Fiscal Impact:

The proposed MOA establishes the City’s cost share for participation in the CIMP and WMP.

The City’s estimated cost share is $24,656 for FY 2026-27, $23,971 for FY 2027-28, and $29,967 for FY 2028-29, for a total estimated cost of $78,594 over the initial three-year term.

Funding for the City’s participation will be budgeted annually through the NPDES/Stormwater Compliance Program as part of the City’s annual budget process.

Attachments:

1. ULAR MOA 2026-2031

Page 42 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 15, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
MOA for ULAR CIMP and WMP for FY 2026 – 2031

Page 43 of 315 ends

Page 1 of 47 ends

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA, THE CITY OF

BURBANK, THE CITY OF CALABASAS, THE CITY OF GLENDALE, THE CITY

OF HIDDEN HILLS, THE CITY OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, THE CITY OF

MONTEBELLO, THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, THE CITY OF PASADENA, THE

CITY OF ROSEMEAD, THE CITY OF SAN FERNANDO, THE CITY OF SAN

GABRIEL, THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, THE

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, LOS ANGELES

COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, THE

SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION AND COST SHARING FOR IMPLEMENTING

THE COORDINATED INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM (CIMP) AND

WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (WMP) FOR THE UPPER LOS

ANGELES RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AREA

This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), including its attachments, exhibits and schedules, is made and entered into as of July 1st, 2023 by and between The SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SGVCOG), a California Joint Powers Authority, THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES (CITY), a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF ALHAMBRA, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF CALABASAS, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF GLENDALE, a municipal corporation , THE CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF MONTEBELLO, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF PASADENA, a municipal corporati on, THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF SAN FERNANDO, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF SAN GABRIEL, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF SAN MARINO, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA, a municipal corporation, THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, a municipal corporation, LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (LACFCD), a body corporate and politic, and the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (COUNTY), a political subdivision of the St ate of California. Collectively, these entities shall be known herein as PARTIES or individually as PARTY.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region ( Regional Board) have classified the Greater Los Angeles County Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System

Page 44 of 315 ends

Page 2 of 47 ends

(MS4) as a large MS4 pursuant to 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 122.26(b)(4) and a major facility pursuant to 40 CFR section 122.2; and

WHEREAS, the Regional Board adopted the 2012 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System MS4 Permit No. R4-2012-0175 on November 8, 2012, which was re- adopted in the 2021 Regional Phase I MS4 Permit Order No. R4-2021-0105; and

WHEREAS, the 2012 MS4 P ermit became effective on December 28, 2012, and required that the LACFCD, the COUNTY, and 84 of the 88 cities within the County comply with its prescribed elements; and

WHEREAS the 2021 MS4 Permit became effective on September 11, 2021, superseding the 2012 MS4 Permit, and requires the COUNTY, LACFCD, 85 cities within the coastal watersheds of Los Angeles County, the Ventura County Watershed Protection District, the County of Ventura, and 10 cities within Ventura County to comply with its prescribed elements; and

WHEREAS, the MS4 Permit identifies the PARTIES as MS4 permittees responsible for compliance with the Permit’s requirements pertaining to the PARTIES’ collective jurisdictional area in the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area as identified in Exhibit D of this MOA; and

WHEREAS, the CITY and the cities of Alhambra, Burbank, Calabasas, Glendale, Hidden Hills, La Canada Flintridge, Montebello, Monterey Park, Pasadena, Rosemead, San Fernando, San Gabriel, San Marino, South El Monte, South Pasadena, and Temple City and LACFCD and the COUNTY formed the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group (ULAR WMG) to collaborate on the Watershed Management Program (WMP) and the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) in accordance with the MS4 Permit, with the CITY serving as the ULAR WMG Lead Agency; and

WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire d to collaborate on the development of a WMP and a CIMP in accordance with the MS4 Permit for a portion of the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area as identified in Exhibit D of this MOA to comply with all applicable monitoring requirements of the MS4 Permit; and

WHEREAS, the first WMP was submitted to the Regional Board by the PARTIES on June 25, 2015 and was approved by the Regional Board on April 20, 2016; and

WHEREAS, a revised WMP was submitted to the Regional Board on June 28, 2021 and is pending approval; and

Page 45 of 315 ends

Page 3 of 47 ends

WHEREAS, the first CIMP was submitted to the Regional Board by the PARTIES on April 30, 2015 and was approved by the Regional Board on August 5, 2015; and

WHEREAS, a revised CIMP was submitted to the Regional Board on March 13, 2023 and is pending approval; and

WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed to cooperatively share and fully fund the estimated costs of the implementation of the CIMP and WMP; and

WHEREAS, the PARTIES agree that each shall assume full and independent responsibility for ensuring its own compliance with the MS4 Permit notwithstanding this MOA; and

WHEREAS, the PARTIES desire to have the SGVCOG: (a) invoice an d collect funds from each of the PARTIES to cover the costs of MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS and pay the CITY; (b) perform tasks identified in CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION in Exhibit A of this MOA;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by the PARTIES, and of the promises contained in this MOA, the PARTIES agree as follows:

Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and fully incorporated into this MOA.

Section 2. Purpose. The purpose of this MOA is to cooperatively fund the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS, as set forth in Exhibit A of this MOA.

Section 3. Cooperation. The PARTIES shall fully cooperate with one another to attain the purposes of this MOA.

Section 4. Voluntary. The PARTIES have voluntarily entered into this MOA for the implementation of the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP -RELATED TASKS, and to authorize the SGVCOG to administer the cost-sharing.

Section 5. Term. This MOA shall become effective on July 1, 2023 a nd shall remain in effect for three (3) years up to and including June 30, 2026. The MOA may be extended, through mutual agreement of the PARTIES.

Section 6. Commitment. Once effective, the PARTIES agree to uphold the promises contained in this MOA for t he duration of the agreed upon term. The Parties agree that costs, expenses, fees, liabilities, and obligations incurred by the CITY in performing MONITORING SERVICES in accordance with Tables 2 -2C(i) of Exhibit B and WMP -

Page 46 of 315 ends

Page 4 of 47 ends

RELATED TASKS in accordance with Table 3-3B of Exhibit B prior to the execution date of this MOA but after July 1, 2023, shall be cost -shared under this Agreement according to the amounts specified in Exhibit B and shall be included in the first invoice.

Section 7. THE PARTIES AGREE:

a. Monitoring Services. The CITY will perform the MONITORING SERVICES as defined in Exhibit A.

b. WMP-Related tasks. The CITY and the SGVCOG will perform the WMP-RELATED TASKS, as defined in Exhibit A.

c. Reporting. Each PARTY hereto authorizes the CITY to prepare and submit reports to the Regional Board as required by the MS4 Permit. In addition, the CITY will submit to the PARTIES the data used to prepare the reports. This data will be transmitted electronically to all PARTIES and as requested by the Regional Board.

The CITY will provide sufficient time to the PARTIES to review the prepared reports. The CITY shall consider incorporating such comments received and answering a PARTY’s questions to the best of its abilities prior to its submittal to the Regional Board.

d. Contract Administration . The SGVCOG will be responsible for CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION, as defined in Exhibit A.

e. Communication. To the extent the PARTIES have communications related to CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION as defined in Exhibit A, such communication s shall be directed to the SGVCOG. Communications concerning MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS under this Agreement shall be directed to the ULAR WMG lead agency. Written notice will be provided to the PARTIES should contact information from the SGVCOG and/or the ULAR WMG lead agency change.

f. Contracting. The PARTIES contemplate that other individual NPDES permit holders may wish to participate in the MONITORING SERVICES without being a party to this MOA. In the event that another NPDES permittee wants to participate in the MONITORING SERVICES , the SGVCOG may enter into an individual separate agreement with such individual NPDES permittee. The individual NPDES permittee will not become a party to this MOA but will be responsible for its proportionate share of the costs for those MONITORING SERVICES . If other individual NPDES permit holders’ participation modifies the PARTIES’ proportionate cost share, each PARTIES' proportional payment obligation shall be modified administratively in Exhibit B.

Page 47 of 315 ends

Page 5 of 47 ends

Section 8. Invoicing and Payment.

a. Invoicing. The SGVCOG will invoice all PARTIES, except the CITY, annually in amounts not exceeding the invoice amounts shown in Table 1 of Exhibit B. The annual invoices will be issued by the SGVCOG to the PARTIES in July of each calendar year for their proportional share of the estimated cost for MONITORING SERVICES and WMP -RELATED TASKS, including SGVCOG's Contact Management Fee, for the fiscal year, as shown in Exhibit B. The first invoice will be issued in July 2023 or upon the execution of this Agreement, whichever is later.

The PARTIES hereby acknowledge and ratify services performed on or after the earlier of July 1st, 2023 or the date of the last signature of the PARTIES that are performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the MOA. Such services shall be included in the first invoice and reimbursable pursuant to this MOA. The CITY will invoice the SGVCOG for tasks performed, deducting the CITY’s cost portion for such tasks and the CITY’s cost portion for the SGVCOG’s program management fee. The CITY shall provide SGVCOG an accounting of the MONITORING SERVICES, and any WMP -RELATED TASKS completed during each annual payment term consistent with the format as shown in Exhibit E.

b. Annual Payment. Each PARTY, excluding the CITY, shall pay the SGVCOG for their invoice within sixty (60) days of receipt of the invoice from the SGVCOG.

c. Late Payment Penalty . Any payment that is not received within sixty (60) days following receipt of the invoice from SGVCOG shall be subject to a late payment of 10%. Interest on any late payments shall accrue at the rate of 1% per month for each month a payment is past due.

d. Delinquent Payments. A payment not made within three hundred and sixty -five (365) days after receipt of the invoice from the SGVCOG shall result in the SGVCOG notifying the Regional Board and the PARTIES that the delinquent PARTY is no longer a participating member of the CIMP or WMP. The PARTY shall be deemed to have withdrawn from this MOA and the remaining PA RTIES' cost share allocation shall be adjusted in accordance with the cost allocation formula in Table 1 of Exhibit B. Withdrawal shall not relieve a PARTY’s obligation to pay its proportionate share of costs that were due at the time of the deemed withdrawal.

e. Contingency. Each PARTY’s annual invoice will include a continge ncy of fifteen percent (15%) for MONITORING SERVICES and fifteen percent (15%) for WMP- RELATED TASKS , as shown in Exhibit B. Contingency funds will be held by SGVCOG until such time as they are needed. Contingency funds that are used will be applied to each PARTY based on its proportional share. No PARTY will be

Page 48 of 315 ends

Page 6 of 47 ends

obligated to pay for additional expenditures which exceed its contingency amounts without an amendment to this MOA.

i. Monitoring Services Contingency . The CITY shall have access to the MONITORING SERVICES Contingency, for paying for or otherwise implementing the MONITORING SERVICES defined in Exhibit A of this MOA. The CITY shall notify the PARTIES before use of the MONITORING SERVICES Contingency is appropriate or required as soon as practicable but any failure to notify any PARTY or the PARTIES shall not alter, eliminate, or affect the CITY’s right to payment. The CITY will indicate the amount of MONITORING SERVICES Contingency used in its applicable invoice(s) to the SGVCOG for implementation of the MONITORING SERVICES. Should the CITY determine in its reasonable discretion that the MONITORING SERVICES Contingency not be necessary for
MONITORING SERVICES, the PARTIES may administr atively shift these funds to be used for WMP-RELATED TASKS and do so using the process defined in Section 9(c).

ii. WMP-Related Tasks Contingency . The PARTIES may utilize WMP- RELATED TASKS Contingency to complete projects consistent with the WMP-RELATED TASKS defined in Exhibit A. To utilize WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency, the ULAR WMG shall discuss the proposed activity and the ULAR WMG will come to a majority consensus, using the process defined in Section 9(c), as to whether to move forward with the use of WMP- RELATED TASKS Contingency and the process for implementation. The SGVCOG shall utilize the WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency to reimburse the entity responsible for administering the approved WMP - RELATED TASK funded by the WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency.

Should the WMP-RELATED TASKS Contingency not be necessary for WMP-RELATED TASKS, the PARTIES may administratively shift these funds to be used for MONITORING SERVICES, using the process defined in Section 9(c).

f. Shifting of Funds. The PARTIES may shift funds collected under this MOA between MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS administratively, without an amendment to this MOA, provided that the overall amount does not exceed the total not-to-exceed amount of this MOA or a PARTY’S annual proportional cost, as set forth in Table 1 of Exhibit B, and if approved by a majority consensus, using the process defined in Section 9(c). Should the CITY require a shift in funds between MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS in order to implement the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS , it shall notify the SGVCOG before shifting these funds.

Page 49 of 315 ends

Page 7 of 47 ends

g. Contract Management Fee . The SGVCOG will receive a Contract Management Fee of $100,000 per year for administration of this MOA by the SGVCOG. Each PARTY will be assessed its proportionate share of the annual Contract Management Fee as shown in Table 4 of Exhibit B.

h. Reconciliation of this MOA. At the end of the MOA, the SGVCOG will provide the PARTIES with an accounting of actual expenditures, consistent with the format as shown in Exhibit E, within ninety (90) days. Any unexpended funds held by SGVCOG at the termination of this MOA will be rolled -over to cover expenses in any subsequent MOA. PARTIES may request in writing a refund or credit of any unexpended funds by the SGVCOG, in accordance with the distributed cost formula set forth in Table 1 of Exhibit B.

Section 9. THE PARTIES FURTHER AGREE:

a. Documentation. The PARTIES agree to promptly provide at no cost to the CITY all requested information and documentation in their possession that the CITY, in its discretion, deems to be necessary or helpful for the performance of the MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS.

b. Access. During the term of this MOA on an as -needed basis, each PARTY shall allow the CITY or its contractor reasonable access and entry to land, facilities and structures owned, operated, or controlled by the PARTY, which access and entry are necessary or helpful for the CITY or its contractor to perform MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS (FACILITIES). The FACILITIES shall include but not be limited to the PARTY's storm drains, channels, catch basins, and similar, provided, however, that prior to entering any of the PARTIES FACILITIES, the CITY or its contractor, as applicable, shall provide seve nty-two (72) hours advance written notice of entry to the applicable PARTY, or in the cases where seventy-two (72) hours' advance written notice is not possible, such as in cases of unforeseen wet weather, the CITY or its contractor shall provide written notice to the applicable PARTY as early as reasonably possible. Any PARTY, including LACFCD, agrees to provide the CITY or its contractor a "no-fee" Access Permit to its FACILITIES. This Access Permit does not cover any fees that may be required for Constru ction Permits for the installation of permanent monitoring equipment. The CITY shall secure any required necessary permits prior to entry.

c. Consensus. The PARTIES agree that consensus in the ULAR WMG will be determined by a two -thirds supermajority (66.6 6%) voting of the ULAR WMG members based on each PARTY’s percentage land area of the Watershed as shown in Exhibit D. Consensus shall be reached using an email vote of ULAR WMG members. Any PARTY that does not respond to a vote within five business days, shall be considered to support the majority consensus.

Page 50 of 315 ends

Page 8 of 47 ends

d. Participation. Each PARTY shall designate an individual to provide representation at the ULAR WMG that is authorized to provide official input on behalf of the PARTY. Each PARTY shall ensure that a representative attends the ULAR WMG meetings and, if necessary, responds to email communication.

e. Additional Activities. The PARTIES agree that additional activities may arise in the course of implementing this MOA, and there may be interest in utilizing funds collected through this MOA or pursuing additional funds, including but not limited to the Safe Clean Water Program, to complete those projects. The ULAR WMG, led by the ULAR WMG Lead Agency, shall discuss and determine additional activities to be co mpleted and the implementation approach to completing those projects. The ULAR WMG will determine which activities to pursue in accordance with the consensus process defined in Section 9(c). Any other PARTY that does not desire to participate in an additional activity can submit a written request to the SGVCOG that they do not desire to be part of the activity. The non -participating PARTY will not be responsible for its proportionate share of funds to complete the additional project, and the cost will be re calculated amongst the remaining PARTIES.

Section 10. Indemnification. Each PARTY shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other PARTY, on a pro rata basis, including its special districts, their member agencies, elected and appointed officers, employees, agents, attorneys, and designated volunteers from and against any and all liability, including, but not limited to, demands, claims, actions, fees, costs, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys and expert witness fees), arising from or conn ected with this MOA; provided, however, that no PARTY shall indemnify another PARTY for that PARTY’s own negligence or willful misconduct.

Section 11. Termination

a. Noticing. Any PARTY may withdraw from this MOA for any reason, in whole or part, by giving the SGVCOG and the Regional Board thirty (30) days written notice thereof. Withdrawing PARTIES shall remain wholly responsible for their proportional share of the costs of MONITORING SERVICES and WMP-RELATED TASKS for any fiscal year for which the PAR TY has not withdrawn. Withdrawing PARTIES shall not be entitled to any refunds. Each PARTY shall also be responsible for the payment of its own fines, penalties or costs incurred as a result of the non -performance of the CIMP and/or WMP. Upon withdrawal by the SGVCOG, the PARTIES shall meet and confer to designate an alternate organization to accept the SGVCOG's responsibilities under this MOA.

Page 51 of 315 ends

Page 9 of 47 ends

b. Default. If a PARTY fails to comply with any of the terms or conditions of this MOA, that PARTY shall forfeit its rights to the work completed through this MOA, but no such forfeiture shall occur unless and until the defaulting PARTY has first been given notice of its default and a reasonable opportunity to cure the alleged default

c. Equipment Ownership. Devices such as automatic sampling stations - inclusive of a cabinet, sampling equipment, ancillary devices, power supplies (EQUIPMENT) may be installed to implement the CIMP. Any PARTY voluntarily terminating membership will not be entitled to a refund for the portio n of the share paid to acquire and to operate the EQUIPMENT nor for the remaining value of the EQUIPMENT, if any. The operational life of such EQUIPMENT is approximately seven years, and after which it may be obsolete or may require major remodel or replacement of electrical and mechanical components costing equivalent to a purchase of a new EQUIPMENT. The remaining PARTIES agree to own, operate and maintain and or replace the EQUIPMENT.

Section 12. General Provisions

a. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoi ces, or reports relating to this MOA, and any request, demand, statement, or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and shall be delivered to the representatives of the PARTIES at the addresses set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. PARTIES shall promptly notify each other of any change of contact information, including personnel changes, provided in Exhibit C. Written notice shall include notice delivered via e-mail or fax. A notice shall be deemed to have been received on (a) the date of delivery, if delivered by hand during regular business hours, or by confirmed facsimile or by e -mail; or (b) on the third (3rd) business day following mailing by registered or certified mail (return rec eipt requested) to the addresses set forth in Exhibit C.

b. Administration. For the purposes of this MOA, the PARTIES and SGVCOG hereby designate as their respective representatives the persons named in Exhibit C. The designated representatives, or their re spective designees, shall administer the terms and conditions of this MOA on behalf of their respective entities. Each of the persons signing below on behalf of a PARTY or the SGVCOG represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to sign this MOA on behalf of such entity.

c. Relationship of the Parties. The PARTIES to this MOA are, and shall at all times remain as to each other, wholly independent entities. No PARTY shall have power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of any other PART Y unless expressly provided to the contrary by this MOA. No employee, agent, or officer of a PARTY shall be deemed for any purpose whatsoever to be an agent, employee, or officer of another PARTY.

Page 52 of 315 ends

Page 10 of 47 ends

d. Amendment. The terms and provisions of this MOA may not be amended, modified, or waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by all non-delinquent PARTIES and the SGVCOG. Such amendments may be executed by those individuals listed in Exhibit C or by a person authorized to execute such amendment on behalf of each PARTY.

e. Law to Govern. This MOA is governed by, interpreted under, and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In the event of litigation related to this MOA, venue in the State Superior Court or Federal District Court shall lie exclusively in the County of Los Angeles.

f. No Presumption in Drafting. The PARTIES to this MOA agree that the general rule that an MOA is to be interpreted against the PARTY drafting it, or causing it to be prepared shall not apply.

g. Severability. If any provision of this MOA shall be determined by any court to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable to any extent, then the remainder of this MOA shall not be affected, and this MOA shall be construed as if the invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this MOA.

h. Entire Agreement. This MOA constitutes the entire agreement of the PARTIES to this MOA with respect to the subject matter hereof.

i. Waiver. Waiver by any PARTY to this MOA of any term, condition, or covena nt of this MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant.

Waiver by any PARTY to this MOA of any breach of the provisions of this MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision, nor a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this MOA.

j. Counterparts. This MOA may be executed in any number of counterparts, which execution may be by electronic means as defined in Civil Code section 1633.2 and each of which shall be an original, but all of whic h taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument, provided, however, that such counterparts shall have been delivered to all PARTIES to this MOA.

k. All PARTIES to this MOA have been represented by counsel in the preparation and negotiation of this MOA. Accordingly, this MOA shall be construed according to its fair language.

Page 53 of 315 ends

Page 11 of 47 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this MOA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives and affixed as of the date of signature of the PARTIES:

Page 54 of 315 ends

Page 12 of 47 ends

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Mark Pestrella, Director of Public Works Dated

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dawyn R. Harrison
County Counsel

Deputy Dated

Page 55 of 315 ends

Page 13 of 47 ends

LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

Mark Pestrella, Chief Engineer Dated

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Dawyn R. Harrison
County Counsel

Deputy Dated

Page 56 of 315 ends

Page 14 of 47 ends

CITY OF ALHAMBRA

By ___________________ _________________________
Adele Andrade-Stadler, Mayor Dated

ATTEST:

By _________________________
Lauren Myles
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By _________________________
Joseph M. Montes, Esq.

City Attorney

Page 57 of 315 ends

Page 15 of 47 ends

CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Dated: ___________________ By: _________________________ Aura Garcia, President
Board of Public Works

ATTEST:

Holly Wolcott
Interim City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Hydee Feldstein Soto
City Attorney

By:

Adena M. Hopenstand
Deputy City Attorney

Page 58 of 315 ends

Page 16 of 47 ends

CITY OF BURBANK

Dated: _________________________

Konstantine Anthony, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Justin Hess, City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Joseph H. McDougall, City Attorney

Page 59 of 315 ends

Page 17 of 47 ends

CITY OF CALABASAS

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
David J. Shapiro, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Maricela Hernandez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Matthew T. Summers, City Attorney

Page 60 of 315 ends

Page 18 of 47 ends

THE CITY OF GLENDALE

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Ardy Kassakhian, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Roubik Golanian, P.E., City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Michael Garcia, City Attorney

Page 61 of 315 ends

Page 19 of 47 ends

CITY OF HIDDEN HILLS

Dated:

Steve Freedland, Mayor

ATTEST:

Deana L. Gonzalez, CMC, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Roxanne M. Diaz, City Attorney

Page 62 of 315 ends

Page 20 of 47 ends

CITY OF LA CANADA FLINTRIDGE

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________

ATTEST:

______________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Adrian R. Guerra, City Attorney

Page 63 of 315 ends

Page 21 of 47 ends

CITY OF MONTEBELLO

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
David Torres, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Christopher Jimenez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Arnold Alvarez-Glasman, City Attorney

Page 64 of 315 ends

Page 22 of 47 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

Dated: _____________________ By:
_____________________________
Ron Bow, City Manager

ATTEST:

By:

Maychelle Yee, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney

Page 65 of 315 ends

Page 23 of 47 ends

CITY OF PASADENA

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Miguel Márquez, City Manager

ATTEST:

______________________________
Mark Jomsky, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Debra Wordham, Assistant City Attorney

Page 66 of 315 ends

Page 24 of 47 ends

CITY OF ROSEMEAD

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Ben Kim, City Manager

ATTEST:

______________________________
Gloria Molleda, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Rachel H. Richman, City Attorney

Page 67 of 315 ends

Page 25 of 47 ends

CITY OF SAN FERNANDO

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Celeste T. Rodriguez, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Julia Fritz, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Richard Padilla, City Attorney

Page 68 of 315 ends

Page 26 of 47 ends

CITY OF SAN GABRIEL

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Mark Lazzaretto, City Manager

ATTEST:

______________________________
Sharon Clark, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Keith Lemieux, City Attorney

Page 69 of 315 ends

Page 27 of 47 ends

CITY OF SAN MARINO

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Steve Talt, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Mario Rueda, Acting City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Joseph Montes, City Attorney

Page 70 of 315 ends

Page 28 of 47 ends

CITY OF SOUTH EL MONTE

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Rene Salas, City Manager

ATTEST:

______________________________
Donna G. Shwartz, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Anthony R. Taylor, City Attorney

Page 71 of 315 ends

Page 29 of 47 ends

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA

Dated: _________________________

By
Arminé Chaparyan, City Manager

ATTEST:

______________________________
Mark Perez, Deputy City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Andrew L. Jared, City Attorney

Page 72 of 315 ends

Page 30 of 47 ends

CITY OF THE TEMPLE CITY

Dated: _________________________

By ________________________________
Cynthia Sternquist, Mayor

ATTEST:

______________________________
Peggy Kuo, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________
Greg Murphy, City Attorney

Page 73 of 315 ends

Page 31 of 47 ends

SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Dated: ___________________ By: _________________________ Marisa Creter, Executive Director

ATTEST:

By: _________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _________________________
David DeBerry
Counsel for the SGVCOG

Page 74 of 315 ends

Page 32 of 47 ends

EXHIBIT A
MOA Scope of Work

The purpose of this MOA is to facilitate compliance by the ULAR WMG with the MS4 Permit. The tasks below outline the broadly-expected work anticipated to comply with the Permit.

MONITORING SERVICES
This includes any and all tasks required to comply with the monitoring requirements established in the MS4 Permit and associated documents. This includes but is not limited to implementation of the ULAR CIMP (Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program), which includes but is not limited to the following activities:

● Receiving Water Monitoring
● Stormwater Outfall Monitoring
● Non-Stormwater Outfall Monitoring
● Urban Lakes Monitoring
● Data Management
● Capital, Operation, and Maintenance Activities
● Purchasing, maintaining, and replacing equipment (capital costs) necessary for monitoring activities
● Development of the monitoring sections to be included in the Annual Report (e.g. trends analysis, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) attainment, summary of monitoring activities)
● Annual Reconciliation of the MONITORING SERVICES under the MOA. ● This work may include additional activities and requirements based upon the March 2023 CIMP revisions, any other future CIMP revision, and subsequent requirements for the Regional Board.

The City is responsible for completing the MONITORING S ERVICES in this MOA, including by utilizing consultant support services.

WMP-RELATED TASKS
This includes any and all tasks required to comply with the MS4 Permit, as well as other work that is determined to advance the cities’ efforts in complying with the MS4 Permit. The ULAR WMG is required to complete the following activities as part of the ULAR Watershed Management Program (WMP). This includes but is not limited to the sub-tasks defined below:

● Annual Reporting (including the WMP Progress Report) ● Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD)
● Adaptive Management
● Trash Monitoring and Reporting Plan (TMRP)
● WMP Revisions
● Website management (lastormh2o.org)
● California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Membership

Page 75 of 315 ends

Page 33 of 47 ends

Contracts regarding WMP -RELATED TASKS will be admi nistered by the SGVCOG utilizing a consultant(s) selected in coordination with the ULAR WMG, unless otherwise determined by the ULAR WMG. The lead agency of the ULAR WMG will provide subject-matter expertise and project management support to the SGVCOG and its consultants for the purposes of completing this task.

CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
This includes any and all tasks associated with administering this MOA, including but not limited to the following:
● Facilitate the development of agreements and subsequent amendments for the ULAR WMG.
● Manage procurements, contracting, and contract administration for consultants and contractors, with the lead agency of the ULAR WMG providing subject -matter expertise and project management support. This could include establishing and managing a bench of technical consultants that could be utilized by any PARTY. ● Distribute invoices and collect payment from PARTIES. ● Pay invoices from the City, upon receipt of invo ice, as established in Section 8(a) of the MOA.
● Manage the MOA budget in coordination with the lead agency of the ULAR WMG. ● Facilitate the preparation of ULAR WMG administrative procedures by ULAR WMG and ensure compliance with these procedures.
● Annual Reconciliation of WMP-RELATED TASKS under the MOA.

The CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION tasks will be completed by the SGVCOG.

Additional tasks may be identified in the process of complying with the Permit, at which point the ULAR WMG would determine the optimal approach to ensuring that the ULAR WMG remains in compliance with any and all aspects of the MS4 Permit and its associated documents.

Page 76 of 315 ends

Page 34 of 47 ends

EXHIBIT B

MOA Cost Estimates

Table 1. Distribution of Combined Annual Implementation Costs (CIMP/WMP/CASQA/SGVCOG fee) ....................................................................... 35 Table 2. Distribution of Cost for Implementing Total ULAR CIMP Monitoring Services .................................................................................................................. 36 Table 2A. Costs for General CIMP Monitoring Services .......................... 37 Table 2A(i). Distribution of Costs for General CIMP Monitoring Services ..... 37 Table 2B. Costs for Arroyo Seco NSWO Monitoring ................................ 38 Table 2B(i). Distribution of Costs for Arroyo Seco NSWO Monitoring ........... 38 Table 2C. Costs for Legg Lake Monitoring ............................................... 39 Table 2C(i). Distribution of Costs for Legg Lake Monitoring .......................... 39 Table 3. Distribution of Costs for Implementing WMP-Related Tasks (including CASQA fees)........................................................................................................... 39 Table 3A. Costs for Implementing General WMP-Related Tasks ............ 40 Table 3B. Distribution of Costs for CASQA Membership Fees ............... 41 Table 4. SGVCOG Annual Contract Management Fees ...................................... 41

Page 77 of 315 ends

Page 35 of 47 ends

Table 1. Distribution of Combined Annual Implementation Costs (CIMP/WMP/CASQA/SGVCOG fee) Agency Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total (3 years)
LACFCD $ 83,732 $ 79,353 $ 95,016 $ 258,101
City of Los Angeles $ 943,982 $ 908,306 $ 1,084,118 $ 2,936,406 County of Los Angeles $ 232,381 $ 217,554 $ 257,621 $ 707,556 City of Alhambra $ 25,278 $ 24,472 $ 29,209 $ 78,958
City of Burbank $ 57,421 $ 55,590 $ 66,350 $ 179,361
City of Calabasas $ 20,731 $ 20,070 $ 23,954 $ 64,755
City of Glendale $ 101,385 $ 98,139 $ 117,135 $ 316,659 City of Hidden Hills $ 4,974 $ 4,815 $ 5,747 $ 15,536
City of La Canada Flintridge $ 34,193 $ 27,729 $ 33,097 $ 95,018 City of Montebello $ 27,721 $ 26,837 $ 32,032 $ 86,590
City of Monterey Park $ 25,626 $ 24,809 $ 29,610 $ 80,045 City of Pasadena $ 81,872 $ 74,179 $ 88,537 $ 244,588
City of Rosemead $ 17,135 $ 16,588 $ 19,799 $ 53,522
City of San Fernando $ 7,854 $ 7,604 $ 9,076 $ 24,534
City of San Gabriel $ 13,688 $ 13,252 $ 15,817 $ 42,756 City of San Marino $ 12,471 $ 12,073 $ 14,410 $ 38,953
City of South El Monte $ 21,094 $ 17,250 $ 18,998 $ 57,341 City of South Pasadena $ 12,064 $ 10,954 $ 13,074 $ 36,091 City of Temple City $ 13,334 $ 12,909 $ 15,408 $ 41,651 Total $ 1,736,933 $ 1,652,482 $ 1,969,007 $ 5,358,422

Page 78 of 315 ends

Page 36 of 47 ends

Table 2. Distribution of Cost for Implementing Total ULAR CIMP Monitoring Services Agency Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26 Total (3 years)
LACFCD $ 66,082 $ 61,483 $ 62,518 $ 190,083
City of Los Angeles $ 711,254 $ 671,309 $ 682,542 $ 2,065,105 County of Los Angeles $ 179,686 $ 163,892 $ 166,695 $ 510,272 City of Alhambra $ 19,008 $ 18,087 $ 18,389 $ 55,483
City of Burbank $ 43,178 $ 41,085 $ 41,773 $ 126,036
City of Calabasas $ 15,588 $ 14,833 $ 15,081 $ 45,503
City of Glendale $ 76,240 $ 72,532 $ 73,746 $ 222,518
City of Hidden Hills $ 3,740 $ 3,559 $ 3,618 $ 10,917
City of La Canada Flintridge $ 27,088 $ 20,494 $ 20,837 $ 68,419 City of Montebello $ 20,845 $ 19,835 $ 20,167 $ 60,846
City of Monterey Park $ 19,269 $ 18,335 $ 18,642 $ 56,247 City of Pasadena $ 62,866 $ 54,824 $ 55,741 $ 173,431
City of Rosemead $ 12,884 $ 12,260 $ 12,465 $ 37,610
City of San Fernando $ 5,906 $ 5,620 $ 5,714 $ 17,240
City of San Gabriel $ 10,293 $ 9,794 $ 9,958 $ 30,044
City of San Marino $ 9,377 $ 8,923 $ 9,072 $ 27,372
City of South El Monte $ 19,047 $ 15,166 $ 15,466 $ 49,679 City of South Pasadena $ 9,258 $ 8,095 $ 8,231 $ 25,584 City of Temple City $ 10,027 $ 9,541 $ 9,700 $ 29,268
Total Estimated Cost of CIMP $ 1,321,633 $ 1,229,667 $ 1,250,357 $ 3,801,657 Note:

1. Total Monitoring Services cost = General CIMP + NSWO + Legg Lake

Page 79 of 315 ends

Page 37 of 47 ends

Table 2A. Costs for General CIMP Monitoring Services
ULAR CIMP General Monitoring Component Fiscal Year 23-
24 Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year 25-
26 Labor (Receiving Water and Storm Water Outfall) $ 253,000 $ 230,000 $ 230,000 Laboratory Analysis (Receiving Water and Storm
Water Outfall) $ 263,051 $ 237,879 $ 240,157
Laboratory Data Handling Fee (15%) $ 39,458 $ 35,682 $ 36,024 Laboratory Analysis (TIE) $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000
Contract Services $ 319,000 $ 305,000 $ 305,000
Equipment $ 136,325 $ 130,081 $ 122,601
Administrative Fee (5%) $ 52,542 $ 48,932 $ 48,689
Sub-Total $ 1,103,375 $ 1,027,574 $ 1,022,471
Contingency (15%) $ 165,506 $ 154,136 $ 153,371
Annual Escalation (2.5%) $ - $ 25,689 $ 51,763
Total $ 1,268,881 $ 1,207,400 $ 1,227,604

Table 2A(i). Distribution of Costs for General CIMP Monitoring Services Agency Land Area
(acres) % of Area Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26
Total (3
years)
LACFCD (5%) -- -- $ 63,444 $ 60,370 $ 61,380 $ 185,194
City of Los Angeles 181,288.00 58.53% $ 705,492 $ 671,309 $ 682,542 $ 2,059,343 County of Los Angeles 41,048.07 13.25% $ 159,741 $ 152,001 $ 154,544 $ 466,286 City of Alhambra 4,884.31 1.58% $ 19,008 $ 18,087 $ 18,389 $ 55,483 City of Burbank 11,095.20 3.58% $ 43,178 $ 41,085 $ 41,773 $ 126,036 City of Calabasas 4,005.68 1.29% $ 15,588 $ 14,833 $ 15,081 $ 45,503 City of Glendale 19,587.50 6.32% $ 76,226 $ 72,532 $ 73,746 $ 222,504 City of Hidden Hills 961.03 0.31% $ 3,740 $ 3,559 $ 3,618 $ 10,917 City of La Canada
Flintridge 5,534.46 1.79% $ 21,538 $ 20,494 $ 20,837 $ 62,869 City of Montebello 5,356.38 1.73% $ 20,845 $ 19,835 $ 20,167 $ 60,846 City of Monterey Park 4,951.51 1.60% $ 19,269 $ 18,335 $ 18,642 $ 56,247 City of Pasadena 14,805.30 4.78% $ 57,616 $ 54,824 $ 55,741 $ 168,181 City of Rosemead 3,310.87 1.07% $ 12,884 $ 12,260 $ 12,465 $ 37,610 City of San Fernando 1,517.64 0.49% $ 5,906 $ 5,620 $ 5,714 $ 17,240 City of San Gabriel 2,644.87 0.85% $ 10,293 $ 9,794 $ 9,958 $ 30,044 City of San Marino 2,409.64 0.78% $ 9,377 $ 8,923 $ 9,072 $ 27,372 City of South El Monte 1,594.16 0.51% $ 6,204 $ 5,903 $ 6,002 $ 18,109 City of South Pasadena 2,186.20 0.71% $ 8,508 $ 8,095 $ 8,231 $ 24,834

Page 80 of 315 ends

Page 38 of 47 ends

City of Temple City 2,576.50 0.83% $ 10,027 $ 9,541 $ 9,700 $ 29,268 Total 309,757.32 100.00% $ 1,268,881 $ 1,207,400 $ 1,227,604 $ 3,703,886 Note:

1. LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Total Cost, which is subtracted before distri buting the cost among the other agencies.

Table 2B. Costs for Arroyo Seco NSWO Monitoring
CIMP Component
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26
Non-Stormwater Outfall Monitoring
Arroyo Seco (3 Screening Events) $ 16,470
Laboratory Data Handling Fee (15%)
Flat Rate: 15% of Total Monitoring costs $ 2,470
Administrative Fee (5%)
Flat Rate: 5% of Total NSWO Monitoring
Cost $ 947
Monitoring Cost Sub-Total $ 19,887
Additional Costs
Contingency (15%) $ 1,989
Annual Escalation (2.5%) $ -
Arroyo Seco (Total) $ 21,876

Table 2B(i). Distribution of Costs for Arroyo Seco NSWO Monitoring Agency
Land
Area
(acres)
% of Area Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal
Year 24-25
Fiscal
Year 25-26
Total (3
years)
LACFCD (5%) -- -- $ 1,094 $ - $ - $ 1,094
City of Los Angeles 3936.66 27.73% $ 5,762 $ - $ - $ 5,762 County of Los
Angeles 2361.13 16.63% $ 3,456 $ - $ - $ 3,456
City of Glendale 9.39 0.07% $ 14 $ - $ - $ 14
City of La Canada
Flintridge 3791.77 26.71% $ 5,550 $ - $ - $ 5,550
City of Pasadena 3586.72 25.26% $ 5,250 $ - $ - $ 5,250 City of South
Pasadena 512.25 3.61% $ 750 $ - $ - $ 750
Arroyo Seco (Total) 14,197.93 100.00% $ 21,876 $ 21,876 Note:

1. LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Total Cost, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.

Page 81 of 315 ends

Page 39 of 47 ends

Table 2C. Costs for Legg Lake Monitoring
CIMP Component
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26
Legg lake $ 22,235 $ 15,694 $ 15,694
Laboratory Data Handling Fee (15%) $ 3,335 $ 2,354 $ 2,354 Administrative Fee (5%) $ 1,279 $ 902 $ 902
Monitoring Cost Sub-Total $ 26,849 $ 18,950 $ 18,950
Additional Costs
Contingency (15%) $ 4,027 $ 2,843 $ 2,843
Annual Escalation (2.5%) $ - $ 474 $ 959
Legg Lake (Total) $ 30,876 $ 22,267 $ 22,752

Table 2C(i). Distribution of Costs for Legg Lake Monitoring Agency
Land Area
(acres)
% of
Area
Fiscal
Year 23-
24 Fiscal
Year 24-25
Fiscal
Year 25-26
Total (3
years)
LACFCD (5%) -- -- $ 1,544 $ 1,113 $ 1,138 $ 3,795
County of Los Angeles 2,044.68 56.21% $ 16,489 $ 11,891 $ 12,150 $ 40,530 South El Monte 1,592.68 43.79% $ 12,844 $ 9,262 $ 9,464 $ 31,570 Legg Lake (Total) 3,637.35 100.00% $ 30,876 $ 22,267 $ 22,752 $ 75,895 Note:

1. Legg Lake now has a fish tissue monitoring requirement at a frequency of once every three years.

2. LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Total Cost, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among t he other agencies.

Table 3. Distribution of Costs for Implementing WMP-Related Tasks (including CASQA fees) ULAR WMP Cost Distribution + CASQA
Agency
Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26
Total (3
years)
LACFCD $ 12,650 $ 12,870 $ 27,498 $ 53,018
City of Los Angeles $ 177,128 $ 181,398 $ 345,977 $ 704,503 County of Los Angeles $ 40,106 $ 41,073 $ 78,338 $ 159,517 City of Alhambra $ 4,772 $ 4,887 $ 9,321 $ 18,981
City of Burbank $ 10,841 $ 11,102 $ 21,174 $ 43,117
City of Calabasas $ 3,914 $ 4,008 $ 7,645 $ 15,566
City of Glendale $ 19,138 $ 19,599 $ 37,382 $ 76,119
City of Hidden Hills $ 939 $ 962 $ 1,834 $ 3,735
City of La Canada Flintridge $ 5,407 $ 5,538 $ 10,562 $ 21,507 City of Montebello $ 5,233 $ 5,360 $ 10,222 $ 20,815
City of Monterey Park $ 4,838 $ 4,955 $ 9,450 $ 19,242

Page 82 of 315 ends

Page 40 of 47 ends

City of Pasadena $ 14,466 $ 14,814 $ 28,255 $ 57,535
City of Rosemead $ 3,235 $ 3,313 $ 6,319 $ 12,866
City of San Fernando $ 1,483 $ 1,519 $ 2,896 $ 5,898
City of San Gabriel $ 2,584 $ 2,646 $ 5,048 $ 10,278
City of San Marino $ 2,354 $ 2,411 $ 4,599 $ 9,364
City of South El Monte $ 1,558 $ 1,595 $ 3,042 $ 6,195
City of South Pasadena $ 2,136 $ 2,188 $ 4,172 $ 8,496
City of Temple City $ 2,517 $ 2,578 $ 4,917 $ 10,013
Total Estimated Cost of WMP $ 315,300 $ 322,815 $ 618,651 $ 1,256,766 Note:

1. Total cost = General WMP + CASQA Fees.

Table 3A. Costs for Implementing General WMP-Related Tasks WMP Component Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal Year
24-25
Fiscal Year
25-26
Total (3
years)
Semi-Annual Progress Report (June) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000 Annual Reporting Package
(December) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000
WMP Revisions/RAA/Adaptive
Management $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000
Report of Waste Discharge (ROWD) $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Trash Monitoring and Reporting Plan
(TMRP) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 150,000
Program Management (10%) $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 42,000 $ 82,000 Sub-Total $ 220,000 $ 220,000 $ 462,000 $ 902,000
Contingency (15%) $ 33,000 $ 33,000 $ 69,300 $ 135,300
Annual Escalation (2% per year) $ - $ 4,400.00 $ 18,664.80 $ 23,065 WMP Program Management Cost
(Total)
$ 253,000 $ 257,400 $ 549,965 $ 1,060,365
Note:

1. Annual Report package includes semiannual progress report.

Page 83 of 315 ends

Page 41 of 47 ends

Table 3B. Distribution of Costs for CASQA Membership Fees Agency Land Area
(acres)
% of
Area
Fiscal
Year
23-24
Fiscal
Year
24-25
Fiscal
Year
25-26
Total (3
years)
City of Los Angeles 181,288.00 58.53% $ 36,462 $ 38,285 $ 40,199 $ 114,945 County of Los Angeles 41,048.07 13.25% $ 8,256 $ 8,669 $ 9,102 $ 26,026 City of Alhambra 4,884.31 1.58% $ 982 $ 1,031 $ 1,083 $ 3,097 City of Burbank 11,095.20 3.58% $ 2,232 $ 2,343 $ 2,460 $ 7,035 City of Calabasas 4,005.68 1.29% $ 806 $ 846 $ 888 $ 2,540 City of Glendale 19,587.50 6.32% $ 3,940 $ 4,137 $ 4,343 $ 12,419 City of Hidden Hills 961.03 0.31% $ 193 $ 203 $ 213 $ 609 City of La Canada Flintridge 5,534.46 1.79% $ 1,113 $ 1,169 $ 1,227 $ 3,509 City of Montebello 5,356.38 1.73% $ 1,077 $ 1,131 $ 1,188 $ 3,396 City of Monterey Park 4,951.51 1.60% $ 996 $ 1,046 $ 1,098 $ 3,139 City of Pasadena 14,805.30 4.78% $ 2,978 $ 3,127 $ 3,283 $ 9,387 City of Rosemead 3,310.87 1.07% $ 666 $ 699 $ 734 $ 2,099 City of San Fernando 1,517.64 0.49% $ 305 $ 320 $ 337 $ 962 City of San Gabriel 2,644.87 0.85% $ 532 $ 559 $ 586 $ 1,677 City of San Marino 2,409.64 0.78% $ 485 $ 509 $ 534 $ 1,528 City of South El Monte 1,594.16 0.51% $ 321 $ 337 $ 353 $ 1,011 City of South Pasadena 2,186.20 0.71% $ 440 $ 462 $ 485 $ 1,386 City of Temple City 2,576.50 0.83% $ 518 $ 544 $ 571 $ 1,634 Total 309,757.32 100.00% $ 62,300 $ 65,415 $ 68,686 $ 196,401 Note:

1. LACFCD will retain its own CASQA membership.

2. Assumes 5% escalation per year for CASQA fees.

Table 4. SGVCOG Annual Contract Management Fees
Land Area
(acres) % of Area Fiscal Year
23-24
Fiscal
Year
24-25
Fiscal
Year
25-26
Total (3
years)
LACFCD (5%) -- -- $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 15,000
City of Los Angeles 181,288.00 58.53% $ 55,600 $ 55,600 $ 55,600 $ 166,799 County of Los Angeles 41,048.07 13.25% $ 12,589 $ 12,589 $ 12,589 $ 37,767 City of Alhambra 4,884.31 1.58% $ 1,498 $ 1,498 $ 1,498 $ 4,494 City of Burbank 11,095.20 3.58% $ 3,403 $ 3,403 $ 3,403 $ 10,208 City of Calabasas 4,005.68 1.29% $ 1,229 $ 1,229 $ 1,229 $ 3,686 City of Glendale 19,587.50 6.32% $ 6,007 $ 6,007 $ 6,007 $ 18,022 City of Hidden Hills 961.03 0.31% $ 295 $ 295 $ 295 $ 884 City of La Canada
Flintridge 5,534.46 1.79% $ 1,697 $ 1,697 $ 1,697 $ 5,092

Page 84 of 315 ends

Page 42 of 47 ends

City of Montebello 5,356.38 1.73% $ 1,643 $ 1,643 $ 1,643 $ 4,928 City of Monterey Park 4,951.51 1.60% $ 1,519 $ 1,519 $ 1,519 $ 4,556 City of Pasadena 14,805.30 4.78% $ 4,541 $ 4,541 $ 4,541 $ 13,622 City of Rosemead 3,310.87 1.07% $ 1,015 $ 1,015 $ 1,015 $ 3,046 City of San Fernando 1,517.64 0.49% $ 465 $ 465 $ 465 $ 1,396 City of San Gabriel 2,644.87 0.85% $ 811 $ 811 $ 811 $ 2,433 City of San Marino 2,409.64 0.78% $ 739 $ 739 $ 739 $ 2,217 City of South El Monte 1,594.16 0.51% $ 489 $ 489 $ 489 $ 1,467 City of South Pasadena 2,186.20 0.71% $ 670 $ 670 $ 670 $ 2,011 City of Temple City 2,576.50 0.83% $ 790 $ 790 $ 790 $ 2,371 Total 309,757.32 100.00% $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 300,000 Note:

1. SGVCOG fee is $100,000 per year and covers both Monitoring Services and WMP-related tasks.

2. LACFCD is responsible for 5% of the Total Cost, which is subtracted before distributing the cost among the other agencies.

Page 85 of 315 ends

Page 43 of 47 ends

EXHIBIT C

Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area CIMP Responsible Agencies Representatives

Agency Address Agency Contact
City of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works
Bureau of Sanitation, Watershed Protection Division
1149 S. Broadway
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Alfredo Magallanes
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (213) 485-3958

County of Los Angeles
Department of Public Works
Stormwater Quality Division, Building A-9 East, 1st Floor 1000 South Fremont Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803
Mark Lombos
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 300-4665

Los Angeles County Flood Control District
Department of Public Works
Stormwater Quality Division, Building A-9 East, 1st Floor 1000 South Fremont Avenue
Alhambra, CA 91803
Jalaine Verdiner
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 300-4666

City of Alhambra
111 South First Street
Alhambra, CA 91801-3796
David Dolphin
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 300-1571
City of Burbank
P.O. Box 6459
Burbank, CA 91510
Stephen Walker
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 238-3804
City of Calabasas
100 Civic Center Way
Calabasas, CA 91302-3172
Tatiana Holden
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 224-1600

City of Glendale
Engineering Section, 633 East Broadway, Room 209
Glendale, CA 91206-4308
Maurice Oillataguerre
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 550-4511
City of Hidden Hills
6165 Spring Valley Road
Hidden Hills, CA 91302
Joe Bellomo
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (805) 279-6856
City of La Canada Flintridge 1327
Foothill Blvd.

La Canada Flintridge, CA 91011-2137
Patrick DeChellis
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 790-8882

Page 86 of 315 ends

Page 44 of 47 ends

EXHIBIT C

Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group
Responsible Agencies Representatives

City of Montebello
1600 W Beverly Blvd
Montebello, CA 90640
James A. Enriquez
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 323-887-1200

Rita Montalvo
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: 323-887-1200 Ext 469
City of Monterey Park
320 West Newmark Avenue
Monterey Park, CA 91754-2896
Xochitl Tipan
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 307-1383
City of Pasadena
100 N Garfield Ave
3rd Floor, N306
Pasadena, CA 91101-1726

Dawn Petschauer
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 744-3929

City of Rosemead
8838 East Valley Blvd.

Rosemead, CA 91770-1787

Michael Chung
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 569-2158

Eddie Chan
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 569-2154
City of San Fernando
117 Macneil Street
San Fernando, CA 91340
Kenneth Jones
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (818) 898-1240
City of San Gabriel
425 South Mission Avenue
San Gabriel, CA 91775

Greg De Vinck
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 308 - 2825

Capucine Hernandez
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 308-2825
City of San Marino
2200 Huntington Drive
San Marino, CA 91108-2691

Amber Shah
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 300 - 0787
City of South El Monte
1415 Santa Anita Ave.

South El Monte, CA 91733

Rene Salas
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 579-6540
Fax: (626) 579-2409
City of South Pasadena
1414 Mission Street
South Pasadena, CA 91020-3298

Ted Gerber
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 403-7240

Page 87 of 315 ends

Page 45 of 47 ends

City of Temple City
9701 Las Tunas Drive
Temple City, CA 9178
Andrew Coyne
E-mail: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 285-2171 Ext. 4344
San Gabriel Valley Council of
Governments
1333 Mayflower Avenue, Suite 360
Monrovia, CA 91016
Marisa Creter
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (626) 457-1800

Page 88 of 315 ends

Page 46 of 47 ends

EXHIBIT D
Upper Los Angeles River Watershed

Page 89 of 315 ends

Page 47 of 47 ends

EXHIBIT E

Reconciliation Template

[the line items shown in this Exhibit are placeholders and are subject to change]

Page 90 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.D.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Christine Tomikawa, Human Resources/Risk Management Director Subject: Resolution approving FY 2026-2027 City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary Schedule

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution approving the revised FY 2026-2027 City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary Schedule;

2. Approving the Revised Part-Time Classification Salary Ranges; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

California law and the City's Municipal Code requires the City to maintain a comprehensive salary schedule listing all full-time and part-time employee classifications with the associated salary ranges in a single document approved by the City Council (2 Cal. Code Regs. § 570.5; Muni. Code Chap. 2.36.) In 2025, the City Council approved various memoranda of understanding ("MOUs") with the City's bargaining units. The MOUs approved by the City Council provide a Cost-of-Living Adjustment ("COLA") for FY 2026-2027. The Director is also requesting approval to increase part-time classification salary ranges to keep in line with California's minimum wage increases. The resolution approves the revised comprehensive salary schedule with the COLA salary range increases and include salary range increases for part-time classifications.

Background:

Through the negotiation process in 2025, the City Council approved seven MOUs and one Executive team Resolution that included COLA increases for full-time classifications represented by each MOU and resolution. The revised comprehensive salary schedule reflects the up-to-date salary ranges approved for FY 2026-2027 and is compliant with California law and the Municipal Code.

Page 91 of 315 ends

Staff recommends that the City Council approve a salary range increase for part-time ("PT") classifications in order for these position to comply with State minimum wage increases. The current entry level PT classification hourly rate is $16.97. The State minimum wage is currently $16.90/hour, though it is expected to increase in January 2027. The recommended PT salary range increase is a 3.0% COLA which will increase the $16.97/hour rate to $17.48/hour, retroactive to July 4, 2026.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This action supports the City Council's Strategic Plan Goal of maintaining stability of the City's Human Resources by strengthening workforce recruitment and retention.

Fiscal Impact:

No additional funds are requested. Fiscal Year 2026-2027 budgeted funds are sufficient to cover the revised part-time salary ranges.

Attachments:

1. City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary Schedule

2. 2026-07-15 Salary Schedule Resolution

Page 92 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 15, 2026

ATTACHMENT 1
City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary
Schedule

Page 93 of 315 ends

Elected Official
City Council
City Clerk
City Treasurer
Job Classification Salary
City Manager $315,732

FULL-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Job Classification Bargaining Unit Effective Date Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Account Clerk SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,604 $4,838 $5,083 $5,340 $5,747 Accountant SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,485 $6,813 $7,159 $7,521 $8,094 Administrative Aide SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,656 $5,943 $6,243 $6,560 $7,060 Administrative Assistant (formerly Police MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $5,248 $6,702 Administrative Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $11,225 $14,361 Adult Literacy Coordinator MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326 Animal Control Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326 Animal Services Officer SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,903 $5,152 $5,413 $5,687 $6,121 Assistant City Engineer/Assistant Director MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $12,204 $15,513 Assistant City Manager Executive Management 7/5/2025 $17,406 -- - $22,947 Assistant Deputy City Clerk SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,916 $6,215 $6,530 $6,860 $7,385 Assistant Planner SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,677 $7,016 $7,370 $7,744 $8,333 Assistant to City Manager MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $9,923 $12,695 Assistant Water Utility Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $9,875 $12,634 Associate Planner SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,580 $7,963 $8,367 $8,791 $9,461 Auto Shop Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,914 $5,163 $5,424 $5,699 $6,134 Battalion Chief Fire Management 7/4/2026 $13,699 $16,680 Building Inspector SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,469 $7,847 $8,244 $8,662 $9,323 Building Official Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $10,758 $13,762 Building Trades Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,822 $6,116 $6,426 $6,751 $7,266 Child Care Assistant SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,495 $4,723 $4,962 $5,214 $5,611 City Librarian Executive Management 7/5/2025 $13,557 -- - $20,470 Civil Engineering Assistant SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,251 $7,618 $8,004 $8,408 $9,049 Civil Engineering Associate MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,595 $10,996 Civil Engineering Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,301 $6,621 $6,956 $7,307 $7,865 Code Compliance Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326 Code Enforcement Officer SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,969 $6,270 $6,588 $6,921 $7,450 Communication Dispatcher SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,161 $6,474 $6,801 $7,146 $7,690 Communications Dispatcher Trainee SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,092 $5,350 $5,621 $5,905 $6,355 Communications Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326 Communications Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $10,029 $12,831 Community Service Officer SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,896 $5,144 $5,405 $5,678 $6,111 7/4/2026
$500
$500
Effective Date
EXHIBIT A City of Monterey Park Salary Schedule Effective July 4, 2026
Monthly Compensation
$500

Page 94 of 315 ends

Consumer Service Representative SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,505 $5,785 $6,077 $6,384 $6,871 Crew Leader SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,822 $6,116 $6,426 $6,751 $7,266 Cross Connection Control Inspector SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,389 $7,763 $8,156 $8,568 $9,222 Deputy City Clerk MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $9,482 $12,129
Deputy Fire Chief Fire Management 7/4/2026 $15,011 $18,747 Deputy Fire Marshal MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $7,998 $10,230
Dial-A-Ride Dispatcher SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,896 $5,144 $5,405 $5,678 $6,111 Dial-A-Ride Driver SEIU 7/4/2026 $3,301 $3,468 $3,643 $3,828 $4,120 Director of Community & Economic Executive Management 7/5/2025 $13,557 -- - $20,470 Director of Finance Executive Management 7/5/2025 $13,557 - - - $20,470 Director of Human Resources & Risk Executive Management 7/5/2025 $13,557 -- - $20,470 Director of Public Works Executive Management 7/5/2025 $13,557 - - - $20,470 Director of Recreation & Community Services Executive Management 7/5/2025 $13,557 -- - $20,470 Economic Development Manager MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $10,074 $12,889 Economic Development Specialist SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,251 $7,618 $8,004 $8,408 $9,049 Electrician SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,301 $6,621 $6,956 $7,307 $7,865 Equipment Mechanic SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,822 $6,116 $6,426 $6,751 $7,266 Equipment Service Specialist SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,914 $5,163 $5,424 $5,699 $6,134 Evidence Officer SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,286 $5,553 $5,835 $6,131 $6,598 Executive Assistant (formerly Police Chief MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $6,482 $8,291 Facilities Maintenance Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326 Financial Analyst MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326
Financial Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $12,231 $15,646 Fire Captain Firefighters 7/4/2026 $10,949 $11,497 $12,071 $12,674 $13,308 Fire Chief Executive Management 7/5/2025 $17,406 - - - $22,947 Fire Engineer Firefighters 7/4/2026 $9,398 $9,868 $10,361 $10,879 $11,423 Fire Marshall MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $10,649 $13,624
Fire Prevention Permit Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,379 $5,651 $5,937 $6,237 $6,713 Fire Recruit SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,775
Fire Safety Specialist SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,076 $7,435 $7,811 $8,206 $8,832 Firefighter Firefighters 7/4/2026 $8,121 $8,527 $8,953 $9,400 $9,870 Fleet Maintenance Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326 Geographic Information Systems Analyst SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,209 $7,574 $7,957 $8,360 $8,997 Human Resources Analyst MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $7,627 $9,758
Human Resources Specialist MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $6,482 $8,291 Human Resources Technician MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $5,677 $7,263 Human Resources/Risk Management Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $12,026 $15,384 Information Systems Specialist MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,220 $10,515 Information Technology Network Specialist MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,220 $10,515 Information Technology Services Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $12,026 $15,384 Information Technology Technician I SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,969 $6,270 $6,588 $6,921 $7,450 Information Technology Technician II SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,076 $7,435 $7,811 $8,206 $8,832 Irrigation Specialist SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,914 $5,163 $5,424 $5,699 $6,134 Jail Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326
Jailer SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,176 $5,437 $5,713 $6,002 $6,459

Page 95 of 315 ends

Lead Equipment Mechanic SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,696 $7,034 $7,391 $7,765 $8,355 Librarian SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,749 $7,091 $7,449 $7,826 $8,422 Library Assistant SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,495 $4,723 $4,962 $5,214 $5,611 Library Circulation Service Supervisor SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,131 $5,391 $5,663 $5,950 $6,405 Library Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $10,029 $12,831 Library Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,131 $5,391 $5,663 $5,950 $6,405 Maintenance Worker SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,678 $4,914 $5,163 $5,424 $5,839 Management Aide SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,686 $5,971 $6,275 $6,591 $7,094 Management Analyst SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,209 $7,574 $7,957 $8,360 $8,997 Media Specialist I SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,379 $5,651 $5,937 $6,237 $6,713 Media Specialist II SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,939 $6,240 $6,556 $6,888 $7,413 Media Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326
Office Assistant (Non-Confidential) SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,495 $4,723 $4,962 $5,214 $5,611 Outreach and Housing Navigation Coord. SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,056 $6,362 $6,685 $7,023 $7,559 Park Maintenance Crew Leader SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,822 $6,116 $6,426 $6,751 $7,266 Park Maintenance Lead Worker SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,413 $5,687 $5,975 $6,278 $6,756 Park Maintenance Worker SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,678 $4,914 $5,163 $5,424 $5,839 Park Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326
Payroll Technician MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $5,753 $7,360
Permit Technician I SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,379 $5,651 $5,937 $6,237 $6,713 Permit Technician II SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,969 $6,270 $6,588 $6,921 $7,450 Plan Checker SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,996 $8,401 $8,826 $9,274 $9,981 Planning Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $11,332 $14,498 Planning Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,656 $5,943 $6,243 $6,560 $7,060 Police Captain Police Captains 7/4/2026 $17,634 $20,279 Police Chief Executive Management 7/5/2025 $17,406 - - - $22,947 Police Clerk SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,544 $4,775 $5,016 $5,270 $5,672 Police Corporal POA 7/4/2026 $9,124 $9,580 $10,059 $10,561 $11,090 Police Lieutenant Police Mid-Management 7/4/2026 $14,537 $16,718 Police Officer POA 7/4/2026 $8,460 $8,885 $9,330 $9,795 $10,285 Police Officer Recruit SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,775 - ---
Police Records Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326 Police Sergeant Police Mid-Management 7/4/2026 $11,938 $13,729 Pool Maintenance Worker SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,678 $4,914 $5,163 $5,424 $5,839 Principal Financial Analyst MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,937 $11,432 Principal Human Resources Analyst MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,937 $11,432 Principal Management Analyst MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,937 $11,432 Program Coordinator SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,656 $5,943 $6,243 $6,560 $7,060 Public Works Inspector SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,681 $7,019 $7,375 $7,747 $8,338 Public Works Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $11,280 $14,431 Public Works Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326
Public Works Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,656 $5,943 $6,243 $6,560 $7,060 Recreation Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $10,029 $12,831 Recreation Specialist SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,495 $4,723 $4,962 $5,214 $5,611 Recreation Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326

Page 96 of 315 ends

Secretary (non-conf) SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,379 $5,651 $5,937 $6,237 $6,713 Senior Account Clerk (Non-Confidential) SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,379 $5,651 $5,937 $6,237 $6,713 Senior Accountant MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,220 $10,515
Senior Administrative Assistant (formerly MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $5,519 $7,059 Senior Civil Engineer MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $10,078 $12,893
Senior Code Compliance Officer SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,677 $7,016 $7,370 $7,744 $8,333 Senior Librarian MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326
Senior Library Assistant SEIU 7/4/2026 $4,903 $5,152 $5,413 $5,687 $6,121 Senior Maintenance Worker SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,092 $5,350 $5,621 $5,905 $6,355 Senior Management Analyst SEIU 7/4/2026 $8,556 $8,989 $9,445 $9,924 $10,681 Senior Permit Technician SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,566 $6,894 $7,239 $7,685 $8,261 Senior Planner MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $9,008 $11,525
Senior Water Production System Operator SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,860 $7,207 $7,572 $7,955 $8,561 Support Services Supervisor SEIU 7/4/2026 $7,076 $7,435 $7,811 $8,206 $8,832 Water Distribution Lead Worker SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,920 $6,219 $6,534 $6,865 $7,388 Water Production System Operator SEIU 7/4/2026 $6,075 $6,382 $6,705 $7,045 $7,582 Water Supervisor MPMMCA 7/4/2026 $8,072 $10,326
Water Utility Maintenance Worker SEIU 7/4/2026 $5,074 $5,331 $5,601 $5,885 $6,333 Water Utility Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $12,026 $15,384

PART-TIME SALARY SCHEDULE
Account Clerk Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $24.26 $24.86 $25.48 $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 Accountant Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $33.19 $34.02 $34.87 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 Administrative Aide Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $28.94 $29.66 $30.41 $31.92 $33.52 $35.20 Administrative Assistant Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $28.94 $29.66 $30.41 $31.92 $33.52 $35.20 Administrative Intern I Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $18.76 $19.23 $19.71 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 Administrative Intern II Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $24.26 $24.86 $25.48 $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 Animal Services Officer Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $25.05 $25.68 $26.31 $27.62 $29.00 $30.47 Assistant Planner Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $33.19 $34.02 $34.87 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 Assistant Pool Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $24.26 $24.86 $25.48 $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 Building Inspector Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $36.75 $37.67 $38.61 $40.54 $42.57 $44.69 Building Trades Technician Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $31.54 $32.32 $33.14 $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 Child Care Teacher Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $18.76 $19.23 $19.71 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 Civil Engineering Assoc. Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $40.43 $41.44 $42.48 $44.60 $46.82 $49.16 Code Enforcement Officer Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $31.54 $32.32 $33.14 $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 Communications Dispatcher Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $31.54 $32.32 $33.14 $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 Community Media Specialist Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $17.48 $17.91 $18.36 $19.28 $20.25 $21.25 Community Service Officer Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $25.05 $25.68 $26.31 $27.62 $29.00 $30.47 Crime Analyst Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $24.26 $24.86 $25.48 $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 Dial-A-Ride Driver Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $18.76 $19.23 $19.71 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 Economic Development Specialist Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $36.75 $37.67 $38.61 $40.54 $42.57 $44.69 Electrician Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $33.19 $34.02 $34.87 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 Engineering Aide Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $20.94 $21.47 $22.00 $23.10 $24.26 $25.47 Equipment Mechanic Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $31.54 $32.32 $33.14 $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 Equipment Service Specialist Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $25.05 $25.68 $26.31 $27.62 $29.00 $30.47 Evidence Officer Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $26.74 $27.40 $28.09 $29.49 $30.97 $32.51

Page 97 of 315 ends

Extra Help I Retirees (range) Unrepresented/At-Will 7/8/2023 $30.00 - --- $80.00 Extra Help II Retirees (range) Unrepresented/At-Will 7/8/2023 $81.00 - - -- $130.00 Fire Safety Specialist Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $33.19 $34.02 $34.87 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 Human Resources Analyst Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $36.75 $37.67 $38.61 $40.54 $42.57 $44.69 Human Resources Technician Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $31.54 $32.32 $33.14 $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 Jailer Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $26.74 $27.40 $28.09 $29.49 $30.97 $32.51 Librarian Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $33.19 $34.02 $34.87 $36.62 $38.45 $40.37 Library Assistant Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $24.26 $24.86 $25.48 $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 Library Page Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $17.48 $17.91 $18.36 $19.28 $20.25 $21.25 Library Technician Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $26.74 $27.40 $28.09 $29.49 $30.97 $32.51 Lifeguard Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $18.76 $19.23 $19.71 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 Literacy Program Coordinator Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $40.80 $41.82 $42.87 $45.01 $47.26 $49.63 Maintenance Worker Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $25.05 $25.68 $26.31 $27.62 $29.00 $30.47 Management Analyst Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $36.75 $37.67 $38.61 $40.54 $42.57 $44.69 Minutes Clerk Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $20.94 $21.47 $22.00 $23.10 $24.26 $25.47 Office Assistant I Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $18.76 $19.23 $19.71 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 Office Assistant II Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $24.26 $24.86 $25.48 $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 Permit Technician Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $26.74 $27.40 $28.09 $29.49 $30.97 $32.51 Planning Technician Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $28.94 $29.66 $30.41 $31.92 $33.52 $35.20 Police Cadet Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $17.48 $17.91 $18.36 $19.28 $20.25 $21.25 Police Clerk Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $24.26 $24.86 $25.48 $26.75 $28.09 $29.49 Police Records Cadet Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $17.48 $17.91 $18.36 $19.28 $20.25 $21.25 Police Records Mgmt Tech Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $31.54 $32.32 $33.14 $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 Pool Manager Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $26.74 $27.40 $28.09 $29.49 $30.97 $32.51 Principal Management Analyst Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $44.47 $45.58 $46.72 $49.06 $51.51 $54.08 Program Coordinator Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $26.74 $27.40 $28.09 $29.49 $30.97 $32.51 Recreation Leader I Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $17.48 $17.91 $18.36 $19.28 $20.25 $21.25 Recreation Leader II Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $20.94 $21.47 $22.00 $23.10 $24.26 $25.47 School Crossing Guard Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $17.48 $17.91 $18.36 $19.28 $20.25 $21.25 Senior Account Clerk Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $28.94 $29.66 $30.41 $31.92 $33.52 $35.20 Senior Librarian Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $40.80 $41.82 $42.87 $45.01 $47.26 $49.63 Senior Lifeguard/Instructor Unrepresented /At-Will 7/4/2026 $20.94 $21.47 $22.00 $23.10 $24.26 $25.47 Senior Management Analyst Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $40.43 $41.44 $42.48 $44.60 $46.82 $49.16 Senior Planner Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $40.43 $41.44 $42.48 $44.60 $46.82 $49.16 Water Production System Operator Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $31.54 $32.32 $33.14 $34.78 $36.52 $38.35 Water Utility Maintenance Worker Unrepresented/At-Will 7/4/2026 $26.74 $27.40 $28.09 $29.49 $30.97 $32.51

Page 98 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 15, 2026

ATTACHMENT 2
Draft Resolution

Page 99 of 315 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE REVISED SALARY RANGES FOR CITY

EMPLOYEES AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT SUCH CHANGES IN THE CITY’S SALARY SCHEDULE.

THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to compensate all full-time and part-time classifications at the rates set forth in the attached Salary Schedule (Exhibit “A”), which is incorporated by reference. The rates set forth in Exhibit A are effective as of July 4, 2026.

SECTION 2: Conflict with Old Salary Schedules. All prior resolutions and salary schedules in conflict with this resolution are hereby rescinded.

SECTION 3: Authority. The City Council has authority to adopt this resolution under Government Code § 37206, which requires the City Council to prescribe the time and method of paying salaries, wages and benefits for employees of the City, and Monterey Park Municipal Code Chapter 2.36 (Salaries), which also requires the City Council to establish a salary schedule by resolution.

SECTION 4: Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code section 16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 5: Construction. This Resolution must be broadly construed to achieve the purposes stated in this Resolution. It is the City Council’s intent that the provisions of this Resolution be interpreted or implemented by the City and others in a manner that facilitates the purposes set forth in this Resolution.

SECTION 6: Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ____ day of _________, 20__.

____________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor
ATTEST:

________________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney

Page 100 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 11.A.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Jason Hing, Fire Chief
Subject: Consideration of Costs Resulting from Abating Weed Nuisances and Authorizing Collection via Special Assessment

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing, receiving public comment, closing the public hearing;

2. Adopting the attached Resolution approving the Weed Abatement Clearance Charge List and authorizing collection of such costs through special assessment; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

On February 4, 2026, the City Council determined that weeds, brush, rubbish, refuse and dirt maintained on certain private properties in the City constitute a public nuisance. The Los Angeles County Department of Agriculture Commissioner/Weights and Measures ("County") is contracted to provide weed abatement services to the City. The County compiled its annual list of properties within the City which contain, or have the potential to contain weeds, brush or other flammable materials sufficient to be considered a fire hazard ("the Weed Abatement Declaration List"). People identified as owning property on the Weed Abatement Declaration List were provided sufficient notice to either protest their inclusion thereon or voluntarily remove the nuisance conditions identified on their property. The deadlines for voluntary compliance or protest have passed, and the County has abated the noncompliant properties on the Weed Abatement Declaration List.

The final step in the County's Weed Abatement process is for the Council to consider approving the County's costs related to abatement and directing that these costs be collected via special assessment.

Background:

Page 101 of 315 ends

On January 12, 2026, the County provided the City’s Fire Department ("Department") with the 2026 Weed Abatement Declaration List (“Declaration List”). Following the Department’s approval of the Declaration List, the County mailed notices to each property owner identified thereon. The County then sent each identified property owner an annual weed abatement notice informing them of the City’s weed abatement program, upcoming meeting dates and times, and required collective action. On February 4, 2026, the City Council approved the Declaration List (via Resolution No. 2026-R3). On March 18, 2026, following a public hearing to allow parcel owners to protest their inclusion on the Declaration List, the City Council adopted the Declaration List via Resolution No. 2026-R15. On July 1, the County abated all non-compliant improved properties identified on the Declaration List.

Government Code §§ 39560-39588 authorizes the collection of weed abatement costs by way of special assessment, where each property is assessed, individual costs related to the amount of abatement work performed on it. The County has kept an itemized accounting of each properties’ abatement costs; this document is attached to the Resolution as Exhibit “A." If the City Council approves the Resolution (including the County’s abatement costs), the City Manager will be authorized to facilitate the recordation of a special assessment as to each affected property with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office. Once recorded, these costs will come due upon the next property tax roll.

For the 2025-26 weed abatement cycle, out of the total 1,573 parcels duly identified as public nuisances, one parcel required County abatement, totaling $5,377.19. The remaining 1,572 parcels will only be assessed a flat County-established annual inspection fee of $59.07, for a total of $92,858.04. The grand total of annual weed abatement costs through this program is $98,235.23.

Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A

Fiscal Impact:

The City of Monterey Park has been contracting with the County of Los Angeles since 1992 for weed abatement services. No fiscal impacts are anticipated to affect actual expenditures or revenues. Furthermore, no redirection of available staff time, supplies or services will be required. All nuisance abatement costs will be collected from the responsible property owners.

Attachments:

1. Resolution - Weed Abatement 2026

2. Exhibit A - 2026 Weed Abatement Charge List

3. Los Angeles County 2025-2026 Report on the Costs of Weed Abatement

Page 102 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 15, 2026

ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Resolution

Page 103 of 315 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE ITEMIZED WEED ABATEMENT

CHARGE LIST OF WEED ABATEMENT COSTS AND DIRECTING THE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER TO

COLLECT THESE COSTS THROUGH PROPERTY TAX BILLINGS

The City Council does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:

A. The City Council authorized the County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioner on February 4, 2026, to abate the nuisance caused by rubbish, refuse and waste materials of all kinds upon parkways, streets, and private properties by having rubbish, refuse, waste materials, and weeds removed;

B. Such nuisances were abated in the manner provided in Chapter 9.87 of the Monterey Park Municipal Code;

C. The County of Los Angeles Agricultural Commissioner kept an account of the cost of abating such nuisance and has prepared an itemized report showing the cost of removing weeds on and/or in front of the parcels of land, listed in the Weed Abatement Charge List, and did on the 2nd day of July, 2026, file the report in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Monterey Park

D. The notice of this hearing was posted at City Hall on July 9, 2026.

E. July 15, 2026, at 6:30 p.m., was the time and place fixed in the notice for receiving and considering the report, together with any objections which might have been raised by the property owners liable to be assessed for the work of abating said nuisance; and

F. At the time and place fixed for submitting, receiving, and considering the report and objections thereto, no property owner, or other person or anyone objected to, raised any objection to the report or to any of the cost therein contained.

SECTION 2: The respective assessments against the respective parcels of land listed in the Weed Abatement Charge List, which is attached as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference, are confirmed as true and correct.

SECTION 3: In accordance with Government Code §§ 39560 through 39588, the amounts of the cost of abating said nuisance on and/or in front of the various lots and parcels of land described in the report constitute special, assessments and liens against said respective lots or parcels of land and will be added to the next regular tax bill levied against such lots or parcels of land for municipal purposes.

Page 104 of 315 ends

Resolution No.

Page 3 of 4 ends

SECTION 4: Authorization. The City Manager, or designee, is directed to take such actions that are needed to place these on property tax rolls including, without limitation, forwarding this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Office.

SECTION 5: Reliance on Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 6: Summaries of Information. All summaries of information in the findings, which precede this section, are based on the substantial evidence in the record. The absence of any particular face from any such summary is not an indication that a particular finding is not based in part on that fact.

SECTION 7: Effectiveness. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

SECTION 8: Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 6: The City Clerk of the City of Monterey Park is directed to certify a copy of this resolution and cause such certified copy thereof to be filed with the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner together with a certified copy of said report, attached hereto.

SECTION 7: The City Clerk is directed to certify the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions.

Page 105 of 315 ends

Resolution No.

Page 4 of 4 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2026.

________________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor

Attest:

__________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk

Approved as to Form:

__________________________
Karl H. Berger, City Attorney

Page 106 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 16, 2026

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A – 2026 Weed Abatement Charge List

Page 107 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
KEY

MAPBOOK
PAGE
PARCEL
ZONE

CITY CODE

CHARGES
J
5225
031
018
6 490

59.07 J
5225
031
025
6 490

59.07 J
5237
008
027
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
002
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
003
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
004
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
005
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
008
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
009
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
010
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
011
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
018
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
019
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
020
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
021
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
022
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
034
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
035
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
036
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
037
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
038
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
039
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
040
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
041
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
042
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
043
6 490

59.07 J
5237
012
044
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
002
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
003
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
004
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
005
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
008
6 490

59.07 Page
1 of
41

Page 108 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5237
013
009
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
010
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
011
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
012
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
013
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
014
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
015
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
016
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
019
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
020
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
021
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
022
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
023
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
024
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
025
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
026
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
027
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
028
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
029
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
030
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
031
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
032
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
033
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
034
6 490

59.07 J
5237
013
035
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
004
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
005
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
008
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
009
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
010
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
011
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
012
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
013
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
014
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
017
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
018
6 490

59.07 Page
2 of
41

Page 109 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5237
014
023
6 490

59.07 J
5237
014
024
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
008
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
010
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
012
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
013
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
014
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
015
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
016
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
017
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
018
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
019
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
020
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
021
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
022
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
023
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
024
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
025
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
026
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
036
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
037
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
038
6 490

59.07 J
5237
015
039
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
002
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
005
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
008
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
012
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
013
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
014
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
023
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
024
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
025
6 490

59.07 J
5237
016
026
6 490

59.07 J
5237
017
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
002
6 490

59.07 Page
3 of
41

Page 110 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5237
018
003
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
004
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
005
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
008
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
009
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
010
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
011
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
012
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
013
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
014
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
015
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
016
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
017
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
019
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
020
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
021
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
022
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
023
6 490

59.07 J
5237
018
025
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
002
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
003
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
004
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
008
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
009
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
010
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
011
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
012
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
013
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
014
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
015
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
016
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
017
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
018
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
019
6 490

59.07 Page
4 of
41

Page 111 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5237
019
020
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
021
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
022
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
023
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
024
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
025
6 490

59.07 J
5237
019
026
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
004
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
005
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
008
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
009
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
010
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
011
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
019
6 490

59.07 J
5237
020
020
6 490

59.07 J
5237
021
001
6 490

59.07 J
5237
021
002
6 490

59.07 J
5237
021
003
6 490

59.07 J
5237
021
004
6 490

59.07 J
5237
021
005
6 490

59.07 J
5237
021
006
6 490

59.07 J
5237
021
007
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
009
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
014
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
017
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
018
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
021
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
026
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
028
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
046
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
047
6 490

59.07 J
5237
022
048
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
017
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
025
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
026
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
029
6 490

59.07 Page
5 of
41

Page 112 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5237
024
055
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
056
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
059
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
061
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
065
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
066
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
067
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
068
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
071
6 490

59.07 J
5237
024
072
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
023
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
024
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
025
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
026
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
027
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
028
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
029
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
030
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
031
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
032
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
033
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
034
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
035
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
036
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
037
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
038
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
039
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
040
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
041
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
042
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
043
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
044
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
045
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
046
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
047
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
048
6 490

59.07 J
5252
001
049
6 490

59.07 J
5252
002
002
6 490

59.07 J
5252
002
008
6 490

59.07 Page
6 of
41

Page 113 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5252
002
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
002
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
002
016
6 490

59.07 J
5252
002
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
012
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
013
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
020
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
021
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
022
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
027
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
028
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
029
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
030
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
033
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
042
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
043
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
046
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
049
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
050
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
052
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
053
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
055
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
057
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
058
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
065
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
066
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
067
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
069
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
070
6 490

59.07 J
5252
003
071
6 490

59.07 J
5252
004
074
6 490

59.07 J
5252
004
075
6 490

59.07 J
5252
004
078
6 490

59.07 J
5252
004
086
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
071
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
072
6 490

59.07 Page
7 of
41

Page 114 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5252
005
074
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
075
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
076
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
077
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
078
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
079
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
080
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
081
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
082
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
083
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
084
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
085
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
086
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
087
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
088
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
089
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
090
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
091
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
092
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
093
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
094
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
095
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
096
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
097
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
098
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
099
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
100
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
101
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
103
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
104
6 490

59.07 J
5252
005
105
6 490

59.07 J
5252
006
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
006
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
013
026
6 490

59.07 J
5252
013
031
6 490

59.07 J
5252
014
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
014
023
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
014
6 490

59.07 Page
8 of
41

Page 115 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5252
015
015
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
018
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
019
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
020
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
021
6 490

59.07 J
5252
015
022
6 490

59.07 J
5252
016
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
016
004
6 490

59.07 J
5252
016
005
6 490

59.07 J
5252
016
006
6 490

59.07 J
5252
016
007
6 490

59.07 J
5252
016
008
6 490

59.07 J
5252
016
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
004
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
005
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
006
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
007
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
008
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
013
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
014
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
016
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
018
6 490

59.07 J
5252
018
019
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
002
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
004
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
005
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
006
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
007
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
008
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
012
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
014
6 490

59.07 Page
9 of
41

Page 116 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5252
019
015
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
016
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
018
6 490

59.07 J
5252
019
019
6 490

59.07 J
5252
020
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
021
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
022
020
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
035
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
036
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
037
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
038
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
039
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
040
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
041
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
042
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
043
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
044
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
045
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
046
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
048
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
050
6 490

59.07 J
5252
029
051
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
002
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
006
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
007
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
008
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
031
020
6 490

59.07 J
5252
032
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
032
004
6 490

59.07 J
5252
032
005
6 490

59.07 J
5252
032
006
6 490

59.07 J
5252
032
007
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
004
6 490

59.07 Page
10 of
41

Page 117 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5252
033
005
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
006
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
008
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
016
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
021
6 490

59.07 J
5252
033
022
6 490

59.07 J
5252
034
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
034
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
034
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
034
013
6 490

59.07 J
5252
035
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
036
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
036
002
6 490

59.07 J
5252
036
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
036
016
6 490

59.07 J
5252
037
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
037
002
6 490

59.07 J
5252
037
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
037
004
6 490

59.07 J
5252
037
005
6 490

59.07 J
5252
037
012
6 490

59.07 J
5252
037
013
6 490

59.07 J
5252
038
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
038
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
040
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
040
018
6 490

59.07 J
5252
040
019
6 490

59.07 J
5252
040
022
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
007
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
008
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
012
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
013
6 490

59.07 Page
11 of
41

Page 118 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5252
041
014
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
015
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
021
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
028
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
029
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
032
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
033
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
034
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
035
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
036
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
037
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
038
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
039
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
040
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
041
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
042
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
043
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
044
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
045
6 490

59.07 J
5252
041
046
6 490

59.07 J
5252
042
009
6 490

59.07 J
5252
042
010
6 490

59.07 J
5252
042
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
042
012
6 490

59.07 J
5252
042
013
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
004
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
011
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
012
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
014
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
015
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
018
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
019
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
020
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
021
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
022
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
023
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
038
6 490

59.07 Page
12 of
41

Page 119 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5252
043
041
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
042
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
043
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
045
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
047
6 490

59.07 J
5252
043
048
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
001
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
002
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
003
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
004
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
005
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
006
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
007
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
008
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
016
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
017
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
018
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
019
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
020
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
021
6 490

59.07 J
5252
044
022
6 490

59.07 J
5253
002
022
6 490

59.07 J
5253
005
003
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
013
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
014
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
015
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
016
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
017
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
018
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
019
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
020
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
021
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
027
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
028
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
040
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
041
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
042
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
043
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
044
6 490

59.07 Page
13 of
41

Page 120 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5253
006
051
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
052
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
056
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
058
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
059
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
060
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
061
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
062
6 490

59.07 J
5253
006
063
6 490

59.07 J
5253
007
005
6 490

59.07 J
5253
007
017
6 490

59.07 J
5253
007
024
6 490

59.07 J
5253
007
025
6 490

59.07 J
5253
007
027
6 490

59.07 J
5253
007
028
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
023
6 490
5377.19
J
5253
008
024
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
026
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
027
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
028
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
029
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
030
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
031
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
032
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
033
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
034
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
035
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
036
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
037
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
038
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
039
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
040
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
041
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
042
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
043
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
044
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
045
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
046
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
047
6 490

59.07 Page
14 of
41

Page 121 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5253
008
048
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
049
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
050
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
052
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
054
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
055
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
060
6 490

59.07 J
5253
008
061
6 490

59.07 J
5253
009
019
6 490

59.07 J
5253
010
031
6 490

59.07 J
5253
010
036
6 490

59.07 J
5253
010
037
6 490

59.07 J
5253
010
039
6 490

59.07 J
5253
010
040
6 490

59.07 J
5253
012
019
6 490

59.07 J
5253
012
020
6 490

59.07 J
5253
012
021
6 490

59.07 J
5253
012
022
6 490

59.07 J
5253
012
023
6 490

59.07 J
5253
012
024
6 490

59.07 J
5253
012
025
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
021
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
022
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
023
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
024
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
025
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
026
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
027
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
028
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
029
6 490

59.07 J
5253
013
031
6 490

59.07 J
5253
014
018
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
003
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
004
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
005
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
006
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
008
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
010
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
012
6 490

59.07 Page
15 of
41

Page 122 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5253
024
013
6 490

59.07 J
5253
024
014
6 490

59.07 J
5253
028
007
6 490

59.07 J
5253
029
004
6 490

59.07 J
5253
029
005
6 490

59.07 J
5253
029
006
6 490

59.07 J
5253
029
007
6 490

59.07 J
5253
030
013
6 490

59.07 J
5253
030
014
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
046
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
047
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
048
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
049
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
050
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
051
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
052
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
053
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
054
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
055
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
056
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
057
6 490

59.07 J
5253
034
058
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
006
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
008
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
009
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
010
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
015
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
016
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
017
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
018
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
019
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
020
6 490

59.07 J
5253
035
021
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
002
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
003
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
004
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
005
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
009
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
010
6 490

59.07 Page
16 of
41

Page 123 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5253
036
011
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
012
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
013
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
014
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
029
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
030
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
031
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
032
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
033
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
034
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
035
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
036
6 490

59.07 J
5253
036
038
6 490

59.07 J
5253
037
001
6 490

59.07 J
5253
037
002
6 490

59.07 J
5253
037
003
6 490

59.07 J
5253
037
004
6 490

59.07 J
5253
037
013
6 490

59.07 J
5253
037
014
6 490

59.07 J
5253
037
025
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
001
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
002
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
003
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
004
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
005
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
006
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
015
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
016
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
017
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
018
6 490

59.07 J
5253
038
019
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
001
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
003
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
004
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
005
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
008
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
009
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
010
6 490

59.07 J
5253
039
013
6 490

59.07 Page
17 of
41

Page 124 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5253
039
015
6 490

59.07 J
5253
040
028
6 490

59.07 J
5253
040
030
6 490

59.07 J
5253
040
031
6 490

59.07 J
5253
040
037
6 490

59.07 J
5253
040
038
6 490

59.07 J
5253
040
039
6 490

59.07 J
5253
040
040
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
012
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
013
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
014
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
016
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
017
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
018
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
019
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
027
6 490

59.07 J
5254
002
029
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
005
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
007
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
013
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
014
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
018
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
019
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
126
6 490

59.07 J
5254
003
127
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
009
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
010
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
027
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
030
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
038
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
039
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
040
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
041
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
044
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
045
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
046
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
052
6 490

59.07 J
5254
004
053
6 490

59.07 J
5254
005
034
6 490

59.07 Page
18 of
41

Page 125 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5254
005
044
6 490

59.07 J
5254
005
045
6 490

59.07 J
5254
005
046
6 490

59.07 J
5254
006
020
6 490

59.07 J
5254
006
021
6 490

59.07 J
5254
007
006
6 490

59.07 J
5254
007
007
6 490

59.07 J
5254
007
008
6 490

59.07 J
5254
007
010
6 490

59.07 J
5254
008
001
6 490

59.07 J
5254
008
028
6 490

59.07 J
5254
009
020
6 490

59.07 J
5254
009
021
6 490

59.07 J
5254
009
023
6 490

59.07 J
5254
009
026
6 490

59.07 J
5254
009
040
6 490

59.07 J
5254
010
001
6 490

59.07 J
5254
010
002
6 490

59.07 J
5254
010
003
6 490

59.07 J
5254
010
027
6 490

59.07 J
5254
010
028
6 490

59.07 J
5254
010
029
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
042
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
043
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
044
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
045
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
046
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
047
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
048
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
049
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
050
6 490

59.07 J
5254
012
051
6 490

59.07 J
5254
015
043
6 490

59.07 J
5254
015
045
6 490

59.07 J
5254
015
046
6 490

59.07 J
5254
016
017
6 490

59.07 J
5254
016
018
6 490

59.07 J
5254
016
019
6 490

59.07 J
5254
016
020
6 490

59.07 Page
19 of
41

Page 126 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5254
016
021
6 490

59.07 J
5254
016
022
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
026
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
029
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
033
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
034
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
035
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
037
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
038
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
039
6 490

59.07 J
5254
017
040
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
014
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
015
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
016
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
017
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
018
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
019
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
020
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
021
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
022
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
023
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
024
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
025
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
026
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
027
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
028
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
029
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
034
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
035
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
037
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
038
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
039
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
040
6 490

59.07 J
5254
018
041
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
085
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
086
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
087
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
088
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
089
6 490

59.07 Page
20 of
41

Page 127 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5254
019
090
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
091
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
092
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
093
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
094
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
095
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
096
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
097
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
098
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
099
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
100
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
101
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
102
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
103
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
104
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
105
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
106
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
107
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
108
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
109
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
110
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
111
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
112
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
113
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
114
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
115
6 490

59.07 J
5254
019
117
6 490

59.07 J
5255
016
021
6 490

59.07 J
5255
016
022
6 490

59.07 J
5256
003
034
6 490

59.07 J
5256
003
049
6 490

59.07 J
5257
001
085
6 490

59.07 J
5257
004
019
6 490

59.07 J
5257
004
020
6 490

59.07 J
5257
015
001
6 490

59.07 J
5257
015
002
6 490

59.07 J
5257
015
004
6 490

59.07 J
5257
015
005
6 490

59.07 J
5257
017
005
6 490

59.07 Page
21 of
41

Page 128 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5258
007
096
6 490

59.07 J
5258
013
030
6 490

59.07 J
5259
007
064
6 490

59.07 J
5259
007
065
6 490

59.07 J
5260
007
041
6 490

59.07 J
5260
009
009
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
016
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
017
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
018
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
023
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
032
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
033
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
034
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
035
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
036
6 490

59.07 J
5260
011
037
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
015
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
016
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
017
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
018
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
019
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
020
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
021
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
022
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
023
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
024
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
025
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
026
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
027
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
028
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
034
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
035
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
036
6 490

59.07 J
5260
014
037
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
005
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
006
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
010
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
011
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
012
6 490

59.07 Page
22 of
41

Page 129 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5260
015
013
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
014
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
015
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
025
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
028
6 490

59.07 J
5260
015
029
6 490

59.07 J
5260
016
016
6 490

59.07 J
5260
016
018
6 490

59.07 J
5260
017
022
6 490

59.07 J
5260
019
030
6 490

59.07 J
5260
019
031
6 490

59.07 J
5260
020
001
6 490

59.07 J
5260
020
002
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
001
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
002
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
003
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
004
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
005
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
006
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
007
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
008
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
009
6 490

59.07 J
5260
023
010
6 490

59.07 J
5260
024
024
6 490

59.07 J
5260
024
031
6 490

59.07 J
5260
024
032
6 490

59.07 J
5260
024
033
6 490

59.07 J
5260
025
035
6 490

59.07 J
5260
025
059
6 490

59.07 J
5260
025
062
6 490

59.07 J
5260
025
063
6 490

59.07 J
5260
025
064
6 490

59.07 J
5260
026
011
6 490

59.07 J
5260
026
016
6 490

59.07 J
5260
026
017
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
004
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
005
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
006
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
024
6 490

59.07 Page
23 of
41

Page 130 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5260
027
025
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
026
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
032
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
033
6 490

59.07 J
5260
027
034
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
040
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
043
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
046
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
047
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
048
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
049
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
050
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
051
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
052
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
053
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
054
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
055
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
056
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
059
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
060
6 490

59.07 J
5261
001
061
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
024
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
025
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
026
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
029
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
032
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
033
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
034
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
035
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
036
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
037
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
039
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
040
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
041
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
042
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
048
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
049
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
050
6 490

59.07 J
5261
009
052
6 490

59.07 Page
24 of
41

Page 131 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5261
010
025
6 490

59.07 J
5261
010
040
6 490

59.07 J
5261
010
053
6 490

59.07 J
5261
010
054
6 490

59.07 J
5261
010
055
6 490

59.07 J
5261
010
068
6 490

59.07 J
5261
010
071
6 490

59.07 J
5261
010
075
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
016
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
017
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
018
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
020
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
031
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
032
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
033
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
034
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
035
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
036
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
037
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
038
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
045
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
046
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
048
6 490

59.07 J
5261
011
049
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
019
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
020
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
021
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
022
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
023
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
024
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
026
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
027
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
028
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
031
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
033
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
035
6 490

59.07 J
5261
012
036
6 490

59.07 J
5261
013
015
6 490

59.07 J
5261
013
016
6 490

59.07 Page
25 of
41

Page 132 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5261
013
017
6 490

59.07 J
5261
013
018
6 490

59.07 J
5261
013
030
6 490

59.07 J
5261
013
049
6 490

59.07 J
5261
013
050
6 490

59.07 J
5261
014
021
6 490

59.07 J
5261
014
022
6 490

59.07 J
5261
014
023
6 490

59.07 J
5261
014
025
6 490

59.07 J
5261
014
026
6 490

59.07 J
5261
014
027
6 490

59.07 J
5261
014
028
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
015
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
016
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
017
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
022
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
023
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
024
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
025
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
042
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
045
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
046
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
047
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
053
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
054
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
087
6 490

59.07 J
5261
015
088
6 490

59.07 J
5261
018
009
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
043
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
046
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
048
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
049
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
052
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
053
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
054
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
055
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
056
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
057
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
059
6 490

59.07 Page
26 of
41

Page 133 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5261
019
061
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
062
6 490

59.07 J
5261
019
063
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
041
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
043
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
044
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
045
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
046
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
047
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
048
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
050
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
051
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
052
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
054
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
057
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
058
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
059
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
060
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
062
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
064
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
065
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
066
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
067
6 490

59.07 J
5261
020
069
6 490

59.07 J
5262
020
028
6 490

59.07 J
5262
021
012
6 490

59.07 J
5262
021
013
6 490

59.07 J
5262
021
018
6 490

59.07 J
5262
021
024
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
008
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
009
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
010
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
011
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
012
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
013
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
014
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
015
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
016
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
017
6 490

59.07 Page
27 of
41

Page 134 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5262
022
019
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
020
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
021
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
022
6 490

59.07 J
5262
022
023
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
001
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
002
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
008
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
018
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
019
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
020
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
021
6 490

59.07 J
5262
023
027
6 490

59.07 J
5262
024
001
6 490

59.07 J
5262
024
003
6 490

59.07 J
5262
024
004
6 490

59.07 J
5262
024
005
6 490

59.07 J
5262
024
014
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
003
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
004
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
005
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
006
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
007
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
008
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
012
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
013
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
014
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
015
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
016
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
017
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
018
6 490

59.07 J
5262
032
019
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
001
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
002
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
003
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
004
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
005
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
007
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
008
6 490

59.07 Page
28 of
41

Page 135 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5262
033
009
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
010
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
011
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
012
6 490

59.07 J
5262
033
017
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
002
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
003
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
004
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
005
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
006
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
007
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
022
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
027
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
028
6 490

59.07 J
5262
034
029
6 490

59.07 J
5263
003
021
6 490

59.07 J
5263
003
022
6 490

59.07 J
5263
003
023
6 490

59.07 J
5263
003
024
6 490

59.07 J
5263
003
029
6 490

59.07 J
5263
004
001
6 490

59.07 J
5263
004
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
004
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
004
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
004
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
004
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
004
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
005
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
002
6 490

59.07 Page
29 of
41

Page 136 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5263
006
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
006
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
001
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
007
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
010
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
010
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
013
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
013
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
013
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
013
017
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
014
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
015
6 490

59.07 J
5263
014
026
6 490

59.07 J
5263
016
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
016
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
016
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
016
019
6 490

59.07 J
5263
017
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
017
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
017
007
6 490

59.07 Page
30 of
41

Page 137 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5263
017
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
017
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
017
015
6 490

59.07 J
5263
017
018
6 490

59.07 J
5263
017
019
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
001
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
014
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
022
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
023
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
024
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
025
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
026
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
027
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
028
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
029
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
033
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
034
6 490

59.07 J
5263
018
035
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
001
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
014
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
015
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
016
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
017
6 490

59.07 Page
31 of
41

Page 138 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5263
019
018
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
019
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
020
6 490

59.07 J
5263
019
021
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
020
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
019
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
023
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
044
6 490

59.07 J
5263
021
045
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
021
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
022
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
023
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
033
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
034
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
040
6 490

59.07 J
5263
022
041
6 490

59.07 J
5263
027
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
027
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
027
017
6 490

59.07 J
5263
027
019
6 490

59.07 Page
32 of
41

Page 139 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5263
027
022
6 490

59.07 J
5263
028
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
028
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
028
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
028
024
6 490

59.07 J
5263
035
001
6 490

59.07 J
5263
037
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
037
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
037
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
037
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
037
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
037
014
6 490

59.07 J
5263
038
017
6 490

59.07 J
5263
038
018
6 490

59.07 J
5263
038
020
6 490

59.07 J
5263
038
021
6 490

59.07 J
5263
038
022
6 490

59.07 J
5263
039
001
6 490

59.07 J
5263
039
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
039
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
039
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
039
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
001
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
002
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
003
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
004
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
015
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
016
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
017
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
018
6 490

59.07 J
5263
040
019
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
006
6 490

59.07 Page
33 of
41

Page 140 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5263
041
007
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
012
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
014
6 490

59.07 J
5263
041
015
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
005
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
006
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
008
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
009
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
011
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
014
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
015
6 490

59.07 J
5263
042
016
6 490

59.07 J
5263
043
010
6 490

59.07 J
5263
043
013
6 490

59.07 J
5263
043
016
6 490

59.07 J
5263
043
017
6 490

59.07 J
5263
043
018
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
001
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
002
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
006
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
007
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
008
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
009
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
010
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
011
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
022
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
023
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
024
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
025
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
026
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
027
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
028
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
029
6 490

59.07 Page
34 of
41

Page 141 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5264
002
030
6 490

59.07 J
5264
002
031
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
002
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
003
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
004
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
005
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
010
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
011
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
012
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
013
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
014
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
015
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
016
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
017
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
018
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
019
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
020
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
021
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
022
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
023
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
024
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
025
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
026
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
027
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
028
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
029
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
030
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
031
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
032
6 490

59.07 J
5264
003
035
6 490

59.07 J
5264
004
007
6 490

59.07 J
5264
004
008
6 490

59.07 J
5264
004
009
6 490

59.07 J
5264
004
010
6 490

59.07 J
5264
004
028
6 490

59.07 J
5264
005
017
6 490

59.07 J
5264
005
026
6 490

59.07 J
5264
007
026
6 490

59.07 J
5264
007
027
6 490

59.07 Page
35 of
41

Page 142 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5264
007
028
6 490

59.07 J
5264
007
030
6 490

59.07 J
5264
007
035
6 490

59.07 J
5264
007
040
6 490

59.07 J
5264
008
007
6 490

59.07 J
5264
008
016
6 490

59.07 J
5264
008
024
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
001
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
002
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
003
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
004
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
005
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
006
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
007
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
008
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
009
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
010
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
013
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
014
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
015
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
019
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
020
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
021
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
032
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
033
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
034
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
035
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
036
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
037
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
038
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
039
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
040
6 490

59.07 J
5264
011
041
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
001
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
002
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
005
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
006
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
007
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
009
6 490

59.07 Page
36 of
41

Page 143 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5264
018
010
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
011
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
012
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
016
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
017
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
018
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
019
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
020
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
022
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
024
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
025
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
026
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
027
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
028
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
029
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
030
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
031
6 490

59.07 J
5264
018
033
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
001
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
002
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
003
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
004
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
005
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
006
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
007
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
008
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
009
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
011
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
012
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
013
6 490

59.07 J
5264
019
014
6 490

59.07 J
5264
021
031
6 490

59.07 J
5264
023
146
6 490

59.07 J
5264
023
147
6 490

59.07 J
5264
023
148
6 490

59.07 J
5264
024
063
6 490

59.07 J
5265
004
047
6 490

59.07 J
5265
004
048
6 490

59.07 J
5265
004
052
6 490

59.07 Page
37 of
41

Page 144 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5265
004
053
6 490

59.07 J
5265
008
016
6 490

59.07 J
5265
008
019
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
001
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
002
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
003
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
004
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
008
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
009
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
010
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
011
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
012
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
014
6 490

59.07 J
5265
010
015
6 490

59.07 J
5265
012
010
6 490

59.07 J
5265
012
011
6 490

59.07 J
5265
012
012
6 490

59.07 J
5265
012
014
6 490

59.07 J
5265
013
010
6 490

59.07 J
5265
013
011
6 490

59.07 J
5265
013
012
6 490

59.07 J
5265
013
013
6 490

59.07 J
5265
013
014
6 490

59.07 J
5265
013
015
6 490

59.07 J
5265
013
016
6 490

59.07 J
5265
018
004
6 490

59.07 J
5265
018
009
6 490

59.07 J
5265
018
012
6 490

59.07 J
5265
018
013
6 490

59.07 J
5265
018
021
6 490

59.07 J
5265
018
025
6 490

59.07 J
5265
018
027
6 490

59.07 J
5265
019
003
6 490

59.07 J
5265
025
044
6 490

59.07 J
5265
025
046
6 490

59.07 J
5265
025
047
6 490

59.07 J
5265
025
048
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
001
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
002
6 490

59.07 Page
38 of
41

Page 145 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5266
002
003
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
004
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
005
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
006
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
007
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
008
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
009
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
011
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
012
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
013
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
014
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
021
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
024
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
025
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
027
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
028
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
029
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
030
6 490

59.07 J
5266
002
031
6 490

59.07 J
5266
003
032
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
013
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
014
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
015
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
016
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
017
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
018
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
019
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
020
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
021
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
022
6 490

59.07 J
5274
003
023
6 490

59.07 J
5274
004
012
6 490

59.07 J
5274
004
013
6 490

59.07 J
5274
004
014
6 490

59.07 J
5274
004
015
6 490

59.07 J
5274
004
016
6 490

59.07 J
5274
004
017
6 490

59.07 J
5274
004
018
6 490

59.07 J
5274
006
022
6 490

59.07 Page
39 of
41

Page 146 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5274
008
001
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
002
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
003
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
004
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
005
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
007
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
008
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
013
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
014
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
015
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
016
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
017
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
018
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
019
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
020
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
022
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
025
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
026
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
027
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
028
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
029
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
030
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
031
6 490

59.07 J
5274
008
032
6 490

59.07 J
5275
001
022
6 490

59.07 J
5276
004
004
6 490

59.07 J
5276
004
005
6 490

59.07 J
5276
004
015
6 490

59.07 J
5276
004
018
6 490

59.07 J
5276
004
031
6 490

59.07 J
5276
004
032
6 490

59.07 J
5276
008
044
6 490

59.07 J
5276
008
046
6 490

59.07 J
5276
008
047
6 490

59.07 J
5276
008
048
6 490

59.07 J
5276
008
049
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
001
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
003
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
004
6 490

59.07 Page
40 of
41

Page 147 of 315 ends

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

WEED ABATEMENT CHARGES
June 25, 2026
J
5276
013
005
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
006
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
007
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
008
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
009
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
011
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
012
6 490

59.07 J
5276
013
013
6 490

59.07 J
5276
014
013
6 490

59.07 J
5276
014
020
6 490

59.07 J
5276
014
042
6 490

59.07 J
5276
020
018
6 490

59.07 J
5276
020
023
6 490

59.07 J
5286
010
018
6 490

59.07 TOTAL IMPROVED PARCELS
0 TOTAL CHARGES
0 TOTAL UNIMPROVED PARCELS
1 TOTAL CHARGES
5377.19

TOTAL INSPECTION FEE ONLY PARCELS
1572

TOTAL CHARGES
92858.04

TOTAL PARCELS
1573

TOTAL CHARGES
98235.23
Page
41 of
41

Page 148 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 16, 2026

ATTACHMENT 3
Los Angeles County 2025-2026 Report on the
Cost of Weed Abatement

Page 149 of 315 ends

Kurt E. Floren
Agricultural Commissioner
Director of Weights and Measures

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Department of
Agricultural Commissioner/
Weights and Measures

12300 Lower Azusa Road
Arcadia, CA 91006-5872
https://acwm.lacounty.gov

Maximiliano E. Regis
Chief Deputy

Protecting Consumers and the Environment Since 1881
To Enrich Lives Through Effective and Caring Service
July 2, 2026

The Honorable City Council
City of Monterey Park
320 West Newmark Avenue
Monterey Park, CA 91754

Council Members:

2025-2026 REPORT ON THE COST OF WEED ABATEMENT

Pursuant to State law, a report on the cost of weed abatement (enclosed) is being submitted to your Honorable Body for confirmation, by motion or resolution, on the 15th day of July, 2026 at the hour of 7:00 p.m. A copy of the report must be posted on or near the chamber door of the City Council at least three days prior to its submission to your Honorable Body, with a notice of the time of submission.

It is my recommendation that your Honorable Body confirm these charges.

After your Honorable Body confirms the weed abatement charges, please send a copy of the confirmation to our Weed Abatement Division at the above address.

Respectfully yours,

ADRIAN ZAVALA
Deputy Director/Bureau Chief
Weed Hazard and Integrated Pest Management

Jenny Rivas
Staff Assistant II
Weed Hazard and Integrated Pest Management

Enclosures

Page 150 of 315 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
)

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK )

Adrian Zavala, Deputy Director, Agricultural Commissioner/Weights and Measures, Weed Abatement Division of the Agricultural Commissioner/Weights and Measures office, of the County of Los Angeles, first being sworn, on oath states:

That on or before the 9th day of July, 2026, he posted or caused to be posted, on or near the chamber door of the City Council of the City of Monterey Park, a copy of his report of the cost of noxious weed abatement on each and all of the properties described in the list hereto attached, of which the annexed is a true copy thereof, setting the 15th day of July 2026, as the date upon which said report is to be submitted to the City Council of the City of Monterey Park for confirmation.
________________________________

ADRIAN ZAVALA

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
15TH DAY OF JULY, 2026

_____________________________________
City Clerk of City of Monterey Park
State of California

Page 151 of 315 ends

REPORT ON THE COST OF WEED ABATEMENT

TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

Council Member:

Pursuant to an order heretofore made by your Honorable Body instructing this Department to abate noxious or dangerous weeds and rubbish under the provisions of the Government Code, we respectfully submit the following report on the cost of abating such noxious weeds on each separate lot or parcel of land, showing the cost of removing such weeds on each separate lot or parcel of land, or in front thereof, or both, to-wit:

(see attached)

Page 152 of 315 ends

July 15, 2026

The foregoing report was submitted to the City Council of the City of Monterey Park on the 15th day of July, 2026, for confirmation and was with all objections thereto duly received and considered, and was by said City Council confirmed, and the County Auditor is hereby ordered and instructed to enter the amounts of the respective assessment against the respective parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment roll.

CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

By
Mayor

ATTEST:

By
City Clerk

Page 153 of 315 ends

City Council Staff Report

Date: July 15, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 12.A.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Timothy Hou, Director of Community Development
Subject: Vacant to Vibrant Community Engagement Outreach Report and Recommendations for Consideration and Request for Direction

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the Vacant to Vibrant community engagement outreach report (Attachment 1);

4. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The “Vacant to Vibrant” community engagement initiative was launched in June 2026 to address persistent community concerns about economic development and challenges with housing affordability. Community engagement feedback shows support for allowing housing on vacant and underused commercial and industrial sites and strong concern about vacant properties, access to amenities, and housing opportunities.

In response to community engagement efforts and the outreach report, staff seeks City Council direction on a concept to create housing overlays throughout the City to provide housing development flexibility to spark economic investment in specific commercial areas. If the concept is deemed appropriate, the City Council would need to seek voter approval to amend the Land Use and Urban Design Element (“LUE”) and its land use policy map to identify the commercial and industrial areas where a housing overlay designation may be applied as an

Page 154 of 315 ends

optional designation. As a concept, the overlay would only create an option for alternative zoning in limited areas and any application to activate the overlay zoning would remain subject to the City Council’s discretionary approval and required public hearings. This report summarizes those findings, discusses the concept for creating housing overlays and asks the City Council to provide direction, including whether staff should prepare documents and return for City Council consideration of a proposition in time for the November 2026 ballot.

Background:

Community Engagement Review
In June 2026, the City conducted a community engagement initiative titled “Vacant to Vibrant” to hear residents’ priorities regarding vacant properties, housing affordability, blight, and zoning. The outreach effort follows two years of active community discussion concerning land use policies in the Saturn Park area and broader resident feedback the City has heard from residents.

Vacant to Vibrant included a virtual presentation and question-and-answer webinar held on June 10, 2026; two in-person presentation and workshop sessions, the first held on June 23, 2026, at the George Elder Park Community Room and the second on June 24, 2026, at the Langley Center Friendship Room; and an online feedback form that remained open until July 7, 2026. The outreach process and community input are summarized in the Vacant to Vibrant community engagement summary contained in Attachment 1.

Participants shared their favorite qualities about Monterey Park, including its small-town feel, dining, sense of community and parks. Residents expressed a desire for more third spaces and improved public transportation and walkability. Housing for young families as well as senior housing opportunities were often mentioned. Residents expressed concerns about vacant properties, as well as concern with access to amenities, housing opportunities and run- down eyesore properties within commercial and industrial areas.

For historical context, on November 3, 2020, the voters enacted Measure JJ, which adopted the LUE (Ordinance No. 2198). A full discussion of the LUE was provided to the City Council in 2019 and 2020, and the City Council Staff Report, dated July 1, 2020, is included with this report for context (Attachment 3).

Measure JJ constitutes the 20-year, voter-approved vision for development in the City and establishes the land use designations shown on the LUE’s Figure LU-3: Land Use Policy Map.

Section 3(A) of Measure JJ authorizes the City Council to “implement [Measure JJ] including, without limitation, adopting all zoning regulations needed to effectuate [Measure JJ] by ordinance.” Importantly, the City Council may not amend the LUE without voter ratification.

This most recently occurred with Measure NDC.

Since 2020, the City has seen a growing number of vacant and underused commercial and industrial properties, some of which have sat idle for many years. Post-pandemic shifts in how businesses and residents work and shop have accelerated this trend, leaving obsolete office and retail space that generates limited economic benefit and, where vacancy persists, contributes to blight. Saturn Park illustrates the problem with portions of this area being vacant for well over a decade. Measure JJ set a fixed vision for these areas but did not give the City the ability to respond proactively as economic and housing conditions changed.

Page 155 of 315 ends

The City also faces significant housing pressures. Residents have described a shortage of affordable and multigenerational housing that makes it difficult for younger residents and long- time families to remain in the community. Failing to update the City’s housing and land use policies also leaves the City vulnerable to State penalties and to projects that invoke State laws which can circumvent local zoning and housing controls. Reusing vacant commercial and industrial land for housing can help the City meet State requirements to plan for an additional 5,257 new housing units between 2021 and 2029 while providing workforce housing, such as townhomes and condominiums.

The Concept: Amending LUE and Land Use Maps to Create Housing Overlays A concept to address community concerns would be to allow the City Council to create housing overlays throughout the City. This requires an amendment to the LUE and its land use policy map. The amendment would identify the specific areas (entirely commercial and industrial zones) of the City where a housing overlay land use designation may be applied.

Importantly, no overlay would apply to any established residential zones (for example, R-1, R- 2, and R-3). The proposition would not itself adopt zoning regulations. It would amend the LUE to authorize the City Council to adopt the zoning regulations needed to implement the overlay, in the same manner that Measure JJ authorized the implementing zoning for its designations.

This concept would operate in layers. First, the voters would consider approving a proposition amending the LUE and its land use policy map. Second, the City Council may adopt zoning regulations that establish the standards and the process for a housing overlay. Third, only then may a property owner or developer apply to activate the overlay on a particular parcel under those standards. Each layer depends on the one above it.

A housing overlay would not apply automatically to any parcel, even if the voters approve the amendment. It would be an optional, flexible designation applied parcel by parcel. In practice, the City Council would retain a completely discretionary approval process: it may decline to make the overlay available in a given area through the zoning process, and it may deny any individual project even where the land use map allows the overlay. In this respect, this concept resembles the City’s existing Business Recovery Development overlay, which activates overlay zoning through a discretionary development agreement adopted by the City Council.

The concept may also establish development standards (e.g., floor area ratios or maximum building heights) that constrain how an overlay is implemented, or those standards could be left to the implementing zoning regulations. The appropriate level of detail to place before the voters, as opposed to reserving it for later zoning, is one of the questions on which staff seeks direction.

The total timeline on the effort involves an election, City Staff research time, and then an outreach and policy development phase to develop the detailed zoning ordinance. City Staff anticipates that if the City Council directs placing a measure on the ballot for November 2026, and voters approve a ballot measure, the outreach process and ordinance development phase would not take place until January 2027. As with most rigorous government processes, it will be at least six months to turn this concept into tangible policy.

Factual Basis: Community Input and Survey Findings
The Vacant to Vibrant outreach surfaced consistent community priorities. Residents asked the City to prohibit data centers; to address housing affordability so that younger residents and

Page 156 of 315 ends

multigenerational families can remain in the community; to prevent homelessness; to protect existing neighborhoods; to create local jobs and economic opportunity that enhance community character; and to position the City to respond to changing market conditions and State housing requirements.

Participants in the in-person workshops expressed openness to zoning flexibility within the commercial areas, particularly where it would not affect their single-family neighborhoods and where it could support more affordable housing or a more active commercial environment.

Public input emphasized revitalizing vacant areas, preserving local control over land use decisions, applying rigorous standards for matters such as height and parking, and preventing data centers.

Questions for City Council Direction
Staff seeks the City Council’s direction on the following questions:

1. Does the City Council wish to pursue a concept creating housing overlays throughout the City through an amendment to the LUE?

2. Which areas should the conceptual land use policy map identify as eligible for a housing overlay? Should the map include all the City’s commercial and industrial areas, and should established residential zones, such as R-1, R-2 and R-3, be excluded?

3. What development standards should be set in the ballot proposition itself and what standards should be reserved for the zoning regulations that the City Council would adopt after voter approval?

4. Does the City Council wish to direct staff to prepare necessary documents for a proposition for this concept creating housing overlays in time for the November 2026 ballot?

Strategic Plan Goal:

Providing direction on creating housing overlays throughout the City will advance the City Council’s Strategic Plan Goal #3 to “Strengthen our Local Economy and Enhance Housing Opportunities” by returning vacant and underused commercial and industrial land to productive use and expanding the range of housing available in the City.

Fiscal Impact:

Providing direction to staff has no direct fiscal impact. Placing a proposition on the November 2026 ballot would incur election-related costs charged by Los Angeles County; staff will return with an estimate of those costs if the City Council directs that a measure be placed on the ballot.

Attachments:

1. Vacant to Vibrant Community Outreach Report

2. Area of Opportunity Maps

3. July 1, 2020 Staff Report

Page 157 of 315 ends

Staff Report
July 15, 2026

ATTACHMENT 1
Vacant to Vibrant Community Engagement
Outreach Report

Page 158 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 1
Table of Contents
Webpage

2 Feedback Form
2 Social Media Promotions
3 W
orkshops

3 Virtual Meeting, June 10
3 In-person Meeting, June 23
4 In-person Meeting, June 24
4 O
verall Experience and Feedback Received
5 Appendix

8 Feedback Form Questions, Responses, Graph
9 Meetings Presentations, Table Break
out Questions, Responses, Graph
13 Feedback Form Response Ra
w Data
21 V
irtual Meeting Presentation Document
49 June 23 In-Person W
orkshop #1 Presentation Document
66 June 24 In-Person W
orkshop #2 Presentation Document
87 June 23 In-Person W
orkshop #1 Table Breakout Response Tablets
108
June 24 In-Person W
orkshop #2 Table Breakout Response Tablets
113

Page 159 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 2

Page 160 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 3

Page 161 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 4

Page 162 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 5

Page 163 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 6

Page 164 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 7

Page 165 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 8

Page 166 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 9

Page 167 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 10

Page 168 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 11

Page 169 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 12

Page 170 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 13

Page 171 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 14

Page 172 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 15

Page 173 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 16

Page 174 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 17

Page 175 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 18

Page 176 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 19

Page 177 of 315 ends

Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 2 0

Page 178 of 315 ends

ID Submis-
sion Date
What do you
love about
living in Mon-
terey Park?
What do you
think can be
improved
about the
experience of
living in Mon-
terey Park?
"When it
comes to de-
velopment in
Monterey Park,
what is most
important to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
"When it
comes to
vacant proper-
ties in Monte-
rey Park, how
concerned are
you?"
"When it
comes to va-
cant building
concerns in
Monterey Park,
what is most
concerning to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
Are there any
developments
in town that
have added
value or reflect
the kind of
development
you want to
see more of in
the City?
Can you think
of areas in
Monterey Park
that need new
investment
or need to be
overhauled
to increase
quality of life
in the City?
"The City and residents
recently moved to ban
data centers in Monterey
Park. Now that the ban has
passed, what should the
community instead look to
in order to promote invest-
ment in the City?"
IP Address Referrer
4553 6/3/2026
15:56
"Community,
food, proximity
to work down-
town"
"More trees
(our sidewalks
bake in the
sun, our streets
show too much
concrete, not
enough green).

More housing
to lower costs.

More parks.

More walkable
destinations."
"Mixed-use
development
(housing
and com-
mercial uses
combined),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Very concerned "Access to ame-
nities,Housing
opportunities"
The 126 new
ave townho-
mes are lovely.

Celedon looks
amazing.
"Saturn park.

Garvey Ave
(within reason
to maintain
longstanding
businesses),
ELAC area "
"Housing, multi-residential,
mid-rise condos, townhomes,
convert some empty lots to
parks."
174.221.149.57 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MPK
4556 6/4/2026
10:50
Central to
SGV and the
food scene is
unmatched!
Lack of public
level 2 EV
charging facil-
ities.
"New
businesses
(commercial/
retail spaces),-
Mixed-use
development
(housing and
commercial
uses com-
bined)"
Concerned "Access to
amenities,Job
opportunities"
Condo build-
ings
"EV charging
in frequently
accessed
areas. With
the increase in
EV adoption,
especially with
the increasingly
unaffordable
gas prices, hav-
ing affordable
EV charging
remains a
blocker as not
every single
housing area
has access to
an EV charger. "
Reusable energy infra-
structure like solar covered
parking or walk ability along
Garvey/Atlantic
162.229.194.113 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MPK
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 21

Page 179 of 315 ends

ID Submis-
sion Date
What do you
love about
living in Mon-
terey Park?
What do you
think can be
improved
about the
experience of
living in Mon-
terey Park?
"When it
comes to de-
velopment in
Monterey Park,
what is most
important to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
"When it
comes to
vacant proper-
ties in Monte-
rey Park, how
concerned are
you?"
"When it
comes to va-
cant building
concerns in
Monterey Park,
what is most
concerning to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
Are there any
developments
in town that
have added
value or reflect
the kind of
development
you want to
see more of in
the City?
Can you think
of areas in
Monterey Park
that need new
investment
or need to be
overhauled
to increase
quality of life
in the City?
"The City and residents
recently moved to ban
data centers in Monterey
Park. Now that the ban has
passed, what should the
community instead look to
in order to promote invest-
ment in the City?"
IP Address Referrer
4558 6/4/2026
13:28
"Love me
neighborhood
the style of my
home. I like
being close
proximity to
most places in
LA\n\nPeople
want to live in
this city but
houses remain
vacant and un-
used\n\nLots
of abandoned
commercial
property for
years Atlantic
and Atlantic
square espe-
cially. New
businesses
open but
can’t seem to
remain op"
Not everyone
takes care of
their property.

We have been
having issues
on our street
with vacant
homes being
broken into
with squatters
and drug users.

Don’t love that
for our families
in the neigh-
borhood.

New business-
es (commer-
cial/retail
spaces)
Very concerned "Housing
opportuni-
ties,Run-down
properties and
eyesores "
Raising canes
took a 30 year
abandoned
property and
now seems to
be flourishing.

Seems like only
big chains can
last or make it
on our city b
it better than
empty build-
ings
Atlantic square
and the huge
amount of va-
cant properties
is a concern.

The old
Carrows has
been empty for
decades and
nothing
"Large areas like that could
use a park, city has been
asking for a dog park, water
splash zone for kids, a large
walking track to promote
health. Something that is
more enclosed to ensure
safety for dogs, kids and
people\n\n"

71.146.111.144 http://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MPK
4561 6/7/2026
10:56
"I love how
clean, quiet,
and green it is.

I’ve lived here
for 30+ years
and for the
most part feel
it is the same
place. Fam-
ily-oriented,
ethnic commu-
nities, amazing
and affordable
dining options,
Asian markets
and family
owned busi-
nesses."
Better use of
mix use prop-
erty that serves
the community
and not just
the ones who
can afford lux-
ury apartments
for singles
who are well
off. Monterey
Park was a
landing place
for immigrant
families and it
should always
be welcoming
for those who
can’t afford
to live in ex-
pensive hi rise
condos.
"Mixed-use
development
(housing and
commercial
uses com-
bined),Afford-
able housing
(income-based
housing)"
Very concerned "Housing
opportuni-
ties,Run-down
properties and
eyesores ,Job
opportunities"
Not that I’m
aware. All the
development
on Atlantic
toward the
10 fwy has
been luxury
hi-rise or hotels.

Storefronts are
vacant because
rent is too
expensive.

A lot of
vacancies in
corporate
center drive
that can be
great for mix
use and hostel
type long term
housing. It
should also
have commu-
nity support
that help
individuals be-
come contrib-
uting members
of the city.

Affordable housing and
community oriented services
that help people become
contributing members of
society.

97.93.129.229 https://www.
monterey-
park.ca.gov/
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 22

Page 180 of 315 ends

Various modes
of public
transportation
are readily
available, so are
LA's cultural,
entertainment
& sporting
events.."
"MPK needs
some basic re-
tail businesses
such as auto-
mobile sup-
plies like Auto
Zone, O'Reillly,
discount
clothing like
Marshalls, Ross,
TJ Maxx, shoes
like Sketchers.

The absence
of retail shops
necessitates
residents to
shop outside
MPK."
"New
businesses
(commercial/
retail spaces),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Very concerned "Run-down
properties and
eyesores ,Job
opportunities"
"None. I would
like to see a
quality inde-
pendent living
combined
with assisted
living senior
facility in MPK.

For refereence,
check out facili-
ties like those
developed by
Cogir Senior
LIving located
all over the U.S.

The closest one
with similar
concept is in
Torrance.(S
Bay). "
"Hoping
Atlantic Square
will be fully
ocuupied like
many years
ago. The
empty store
front stretch
on Atlantic
before NBC
are worrisome.

MPK needs
to diversity its
businesses
to more than
just eateries,
bakeries and
healthcare. "
"An IKEA in MPK.will be nice
as Burbank, West Covina &
Culver City are a bit far for
residents in the SGV.. 1800
Saturn St or other similar
parcels might be big enough
for one. With more housing
going up in MPK & Montebel-
lo, there will be demand. "
172.56.232.254 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MPK
4569 6/12/2026
2:23
It has a good
size Chinese
community to
interact and
also has the
restaurants and
grocery chains
I can get food.

It looks like an
intelligent run
city
"We should
develop but
also care for
conservation of
wildlife, provide
affordable
housing but
let us enjoy
our homes in
peace"
"Single fam-
ily housing
(homes),Afford-
able housing
(income-based
housing),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Very concerned "Housing
opportuni-
ties,Run-down
properties and
eyesores "
I think Market
Place has been
active and pulls
in lots of traffic
and business
and crime.

Home Depot
is the most
convenient for
me when I do
home improve-
ments.

Some town
homes seem
old and
residents are
not willing to
maintain them
(no paint or
repaint. Some
condo projects
were badly en-
gineered and
those should
be torn down
and rebuilt cor-
rectly e.g. 400
S. Garfield
I think we can have housing
and shops but we should also
have spay and neuter events
to help residents control cat
population
138.229.223.101 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MPK
4589 6/18/2026
18:20
Proximity to
a lot
Traffic on riggin
and Garfield
exiting to Mon-
tebello horrible
New business-
es (commer-
cial/retail
spaces)
Concerned "Run-down
properties and
eyesores ,Job
opportunities"
"No, it’s terrible.

Atlantic square
is a joke. The
parking design
from 50 years
ago. It’s not
sustainable."
The south end
of the city that
neighbors with
East LA Monte-
bello needs to
be revitalized
Garfield Ave
Get small businesses boom-
ing
172.127.1.226
https://www.
montereypark.ca.gov/
FormCenter/Commu-
nity-Development-On-
line-Forms-4/VacanttoVi-
brant-Help-Shape-Mon-
terey-Park-138
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 23

Page 181 of 315 ends

ID Submis-
sion Date
What do you
love about
living in Mon-
terey Park?
What do you
think can be
improved
about the
experience of
living in Mon-
terey Park?
"When it
comes to de-
velopment in
Monterey Park,
what is most
important to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
"When it
comes to
vacant proper-
ties in Monte-
rey Park, how
concerned are
you?"
"When it
comes to va-
cant building
concerns in
Monterey Park,
what is most
concerning to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
Are there any
developments
in town that
have added
value or reflect
the kind of
development
you want to
see more of in
the City?
Can you think
of areas in
Monterey Park
that need new
investment
or need to be
overhauled
to increase
quality of life
in the City?
"The City and residents
recently moved to ban
data centers in Monterey
Park. Now that the ban has
passed, what should the
community instead look to
in order to promote invest-
ment in the City?"
IP Address Referrer
4598 6/23/2026
14:47
"people, food,
parks"
Walkability and
bikeability.
"Mixed-use
development
(housing and
commercial
uses com-
bined),Afford-
able housing
(income-based
housing)"
Concerned "Access to ame-
nities,Housing
opportunities"
no saturn park "community land trusts, orga-
nizations that develop for the
residents quality of life and
not for profit. if the reason for
bringing in a develpment is
for tax revenue, it's probably
a bad investment for our
quality of life. Data center is
the prime example."

99.46.81.244 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MPK
4600 6/24/2026
13:01
I love the com-
munity and
the diversity
of people and
how food
brings everyone
together.
"More local job
opportunities
for young peo-
ple who want
to stay and set-
tle in Monterey
Park and start
families. More
walkable areas
and third plac-
es for all age
groups. Maybe
mahjong or
bingo hall, both
are popular
among elderly
and also young
people recent-
ly. Especially\
nmahjong. "
"New
businesses
(commercial/
retail spaces),-
Mixed-use
development
(housing and
commercial
uses com-
bined),Single
family housing
(homes),Afford-
able housing
(income-based
housing)"
Very concerned "Run-down
properties and
eyesores ,Job
opportunities"
The mahjong
collective and
bookstore
create lots of
events that
people enjoy.

More of those.

The festivals
for lunar new
year and cherry
blossom etc
create lots of
community.

More cafes and
small business-
es please.
"Saturn park
area that is
vacant, also the
commercial/
office buildings,
plazas that do
not receive lots
of traffic. There
is a lot of big-
ger\nproperties
near Panda
Express/Chipo-
tle and Atlantic
Square has
high turnover it
seems."
"More community centers
and events that partner with
local business to show de-
mand for more development.

New mahjong hall would be
nice or Trader Joe’s/HMart,
maybe commercial center
like food hall or small music
venue would also bring
in more business. Atlantic
Square stage rarely gets use. "

47.229.200.177 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 2 4

Page 182 of 315 ends

ID Submis-
sion Date
What do you
love about
living in Mon-
terey Park?
What do you
think can be
improved
about the
experience of
living in Mon-
terey Park?
"When it
comes to de-
velopment in
Monterey Park,
what is most
important to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
"When it
comes to
vacant proper-
ties in Monte-
rey Park, how
concerned are
you?"
"When it
comes to va-
cant building
concerns in
Monterey Park,
what is most
concerning to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
Are there any
developments
in town that
have added
value or reflect
the kind of
development
you want to
see more of in
the City?
Can you think
of areas in
Monterey Park
that need new
investment
or need to be
overhauled
to increase
quality of life
in the City?
"The City and residents
recently moved to ban
data centers in Monterey
Park. Now that the ban has
passed, what should the
community instead look to
in order to promote invest-
ment in the City?"
IP Address Referrer
4601 6/24/2026
13:01
I love that I
know and my
neighbors and
see the same
people out
when I am
walking my
dog or doing
yard work.
"Affordable
housing
needs to be
addressed.

ADU’s are not
a solution, they
contribute to a
problem with
reduced street
parking and
the people
who rent those
ADU usually
are not from
the area and
I notice it
increases crime
where they are.

We need more
markets like
Spouts, Trader
Joe’s in our
city. "
"New
businesses
(commercial/
retail spaces),-
Mixed-use
development
(housing and
commercial
uses com-
bined),Single
family housing
(homes),Afford-
able housing
(income-based
housing)"
Very concerned Run-down
properties and
eyesores
Costco has
added conve-
nience but it
is also causing
massive traffic.
"City parks
need to be
invested in
and updated.

They need dog
parks, trails "
"New grocery stores, restau-
rant"
104.28.111.144 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
4602 6/24/2026
13:02
"Safe, quiet,
clean environ-
ment"
more parks
and more trees
New business-
es (commer-
cial/retail
spaces)
Concerned Run-down
properties and
eyesores
na na more friendly regulations on
restaurants built

75.142.220.123 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 25

Page 183 of 315 ends

ID Submis-
sion Date
What do you
love about
living in Mon-
terey Park?
What do you
think can be
improved
about the
experience of
living in Mon-
terey Park?
"When it
comes to de-
velopment in
Monterey Park,
what is most
important to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
"When it
comes to
vacant proper-
ties in Monte-
rey Park, how
concerned are
you?"
"When it
comes to va-
cant building
concerns in
Monterey Park,
what is most
concerning to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
Are there any
developments
in town that
have added
value or reflect
the kind of
development
you want to
see more of in
the City?
Can you think
of areas in
Monterey Park
that need new
investment
or need to be
overhauled
to increase
quality of life
in the City?
"The City and residents
recently moved to ban
data centers in Monterey
Park. Now that the ban has
passed, what should the
community instead look to
in order to promote invest-
ment in the City?"
IP Address Referrer
4603 6/24/2026
13:03
"I love the
""small town""
feel. We have
a great com-
munity with
many excellent
services, great
foods, and
many beautiful
streets."
There are too
many vacant
lots/build-
ings and too
many similar
businesses (e.g.
boba). Monte-
rey Park should
have more
businesses that
appeal to a
wider range of
people to draw
more people to
the city. There
are also a lot
of run-down
houses/apart-
ments and
overgrown lots.
"New business-
es (commer-
cial/retail
spaces),Single
family housing
(homes)"
Very concerned "Access
to ameni-
ties,Run-down
properties and
eyesores "
"New, non-
chain business-
es. An example
is Yihui Coffee.

These types of
businesses put
MPK on the
map and draw
people to the
community. "
"Garvey Ave:

There is so
much oppor-
tunity for this
to be a vibrant
street, but it
feels run-down.

Businesses
often shutter or
switch hands
quickly. Also
the vacant lot
on the corner
of Garvey and
Garfield, and
other vacant
lots along
Garfield. Huge
eye sores and
attract crime."
A Trader Joe's or Sprouts in
that space would be hugely
welcome and would make
Monterey Park a more desir-
able place to live. This could
also be part of a mixed-use
development.

97.90.16.82 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
4604 6/24/2026
13:07
I love how
quiet it is.

Upgrade the
Macy—pool
it’s old. Clean
up our side of
the 60 freeway
it looks like
trash. Remove
flock cameras
(what the
heck). Fix the
roads. Better
landscaping.
"New
businesses
(commercial/
retail spaces),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Not concerned "Housing
opportuni-
ties,Run-down
properties and
eyesores ,Job
opportunities"
"Maybe the
updated parks,
but I’m not see-
ing the type of
development
needed. It’s like
we are stuck in
the 80’s over
here."
Yes—REMOVE

FLOCK CAM-
ERAS!
"First of all thank you for
helping us ban these god
forsaken data centers. We
couldn’t have done that
without you! <3 but in regards
to investment—I’m ok with
anything that doesn’t hurt
people or the environment.

Housing, businesses, anything
that can generate money
without hurting anyone/
anything. "
162.224.238.240 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
4605 6/24/2026
13:07
"Sense of Safe-
ty, Convenience
and ease of
accessibility,
Cleanliness and
Order"
"Too many
apartments
and cars now,
limit building
of multi home
properties"
Single fam-
ily housing
(homes)
Very concerned "Housing
opportuni-
ties,Run-down
properties and
eyesores "
"YES, Atlantic
Times Square
restaurants
and stores, al-
though would
prefer more
resident/pri-
vately owned
establish-
ments"
"YES, Atlantic
Square, Corner
of Atlantic and
Garvey Plaza,
Lincoln Plaza
Hotel"
"Single home housing, fitness
building, children enrich-
ment education, indoor mall
with fitness studio"

12.153.72.2 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 2 6

Page 184 of 315 ends

ID Submis-
sion Date
What do you
love about
living in Mon-
terey Park?
What do you
think can be
improved
about the
experience of
living in Mon-
terey Park?
"When it
comes to de-
velopment in
Monterey Park,
what is most
important to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
"When it
comes to
vacant proper-
ties in Monte-
rey Park, how
concerned are
you?"
"When it
comes to va-
cant building
concerns in
Monterey Park,
what is most
concerning to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
Are there any
developments
in town that
have added
value or reflect
the kind of
development
you want to
see more of in
the City?
Can you think
of areas in
Monterey Park
that need new
investment
or need to be
overhauled
to increase
quality of life
in the City?
"The City and residents
recently moved to ban
data centers in Monterey
Park. Now that the ban has
passed, what should the
community instead look to
in order to promote invest-
ment in the City?"
IP Address Referrer
4606 6/24/2026
13:20
I love how
peaceful it is
and how it is
currently get-
ting revitalized
by younger
folks moving
in. I love how
respectful each
generation is of
each other and
that there is a
feeling of prog-
ress happening
with respect
to the older
generations.

I think the
stores and
restaurants
can become
more diverse to
reflect the di-
versity that lives
here. Too many
boarded up
or unfinished
buildings/stores
& for lease signs
and owners of
buildings need
to be forced
to maintain
upkeep to their
properties.

Cleanliness in
public areas is
also concern-
ing.
"Single fam-
ily housing
(homes),Afford-
able housing
(income-based
housing)"
Very concerned "Run-down
properties and
eyesores ,Job
opportunities"
"Parks, Vincent
Price Museum,
Bruggemeyer
Library"
"The entire strip
of Garvey from
abajo to atlan-
tic including
atlantic place
shopping cen-
ter & the bus
stop in front,
""downtown
Monterey
Park"", around
the lincoln
plaza hotel"
"Green areas, community
areas, affordable housing, in
terms of retail - something
the city can use and will
spend money at like a trader
joes or whole foods, or a mar-
ket place similar to blossom
hall in SG"

47.232.231.11 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
4607 6/24/2026
13:21
"The restau-
rants are a
huge plus and
also brings in
people from
other areas.

Please NO
gentrification.

For example,
we don't need
Starbucks here,
there's plenty
of tea and
coffee places
that are special
to Monterey
Park and why
people from
other cities
come here."
More walkabil-
ity and public
transportation
to get from one
area to another.
"Mixed-use
development
(housing
and com-
mercial uses
combined),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Not sure "Housing op-
portunities,Job
opportunities"
"I would like
to see more
housing
development.

Multi-family,
mixed use,
senior housing,
affordable
housing. This
will also raise
enrollment in
schools."
"Garvey Ave.,
Mid Atlantic
Blvd. Saturn
Park"
"Definitely NOT BESS (Battery
Energy Storage System).\
nInvest in more housing and
promoting walkability along
with public transportation. "

66.215.221.28 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 2 7

Page 185 of 315 ends

We love that it's
close to the city
but not riddled
with crime and
homelessness
like other areas.
"Do some-
thing with all
of the vacant
commercial
properties. They
really bring
the commu-
nity down, are
an eyesore,
and prevent
businesses
from wanting
to establishing
here because
it gives the
impression that
businesses are
not successful
here. "
"New business-
es (commer-
cial/retail
spaces),Single
family housing
(homes)"
Very concerned Run-down
properties and
eyesores
The two new
businesses
in Atlantic
Square. They
give hope that
MP can thrive.
"Atlantic
Square, inter-
section of Gar-
vey/Atlantic. "
Doing something about
vacant business properties. Is
it possible to place a limit on
how long a lot/property can
be vacant until it's deemed a
blught to the community?

99.46.80.254 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
4609 6/24/2026
13:38
Monterey Park
is a diverse
place with
people who
have brought
over centuries
old culture
and com-
bined it with
living here. It
is what makes
Monterey Park.

It greeted me
with open
arms when i
moved here.

The food and
the people are
the best in the
LA area.

Cost of living
and Parking
Spaces
"Affordable
housing
(income-based
housing),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Very concerned "Housing op-
portunities,Job
opportunities"
"Restaurants,
Mom and pop
shops, book-
stores. "
Not really but
that doesn’t
mean there
aren’t areas
that need im-
provement.
"Transit, Cultural Tourism, and
Walkable Tourism areas "

47.232.146.213 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 28

Page 186 of 315 ends

ID Submis-
sion Date
What do you
love about
living in Mon-
terey Park?
What do you
think can be
improved
about the
experience of
living in Mon-
terey Park?
"When it
comes to de-
velopment in
Monterey Park,
what is most
important to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
"When it
comes to
vacant proper-
ties in Monte-
rey Park, how
concerned are
you?"
"When it
comes to va-
cant building
concerns in
Monterey Park,
what is most
concerning to
you? (Please
select only
two.)"
Are there any
developments
in town that
have added
value or reflect
the kind of
development
you want to
see more of in
the City?
Can you think
of areas in
Monterey Park
that need new
investment
or need to be
overhauled
to increase
quality of life
in the City?
"The City and residents
recently moved to ban
data centers in Monterey
Park. Now that the ban has
passed, what should the
community instead look to
in order to promote invest-
ment in the City?"
IP Address Referrer
4610 6/24/2026
13:39
"Complex
immigrant net-
works, being
in community
with other
POC, shopping
at minori-
ty-owned small
businesses,
easy and free
parking"
"More trees/
greenery on
the sidewalks,
easier access to
public transit"
"Affordable
housing
(income-based
housing),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Not concerned "Access to ame-
nities,Housing
opportunities"
"I appreciated
the devel-
opment of
Atlantic Times
Square. It add-
ed a cool place
to hang out,
and had a lot
of interesting
shops and
restaurants.

However, the
housing there
is not afford-
able. "
More invest-
ment in public
transit and
other public
infrastructure
"I'm not sure, but I don't think
we should be looking to big
corporations--one of the
biggest charms of Monterey
Park is its small businesses
and not big-box chains"

97.90.38.62 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
4611 6/24/2026
14:11
"MPK has
a variety of
foods choices,
quiet neighbor-
hoods. "
More safety
measure in
place to ensure
residents are
safe and more
innovative
playgrounds
for children
and families
to enjoy. There
should be
more green
spaces and
environmental
friendly for
our future.

We should
have a more
family friendly
atmosphere to
attract young
families to
MPK.
"New business-
es (commer-
cial/retail
spaces),Single
family housing
(homes),-
Multi-family
housing (apart-
ments/condo-
miniums)"
Very concerned "Access
to ameni-
ties,Run-down
properties and
eyesores "
I would like
to see more
family friendly
development
"Yes, MPK have
a lot of run
down buildings
that made our
city look old
and does not
attract others
to come to our
city such as
Garvey Ave and
some area in
Atlantic square.

From 10 fwy to
Garvey on At-
lantic square is
doing very well.

It would be
great if we can
make it more
lively to attract
others. "
I would like to see more
housing and businesses that
can attract young family. We
should also build more family
friendly businesses/faciliites
in MPK.

45.29.213.96 https://www.
monte-
reypark.
ca.gov/1732/
Vacant-to-Vi-
brant-MP-
K?utm_
source=sub-
stack&utm_
medium=e-
mail
Monterey Park Community Outreach Report 29

Page 187 of 315 ends

Monterey Park City CouncilJuly 15, 2026

Monterey Park City Council
July 15, 2026