Agenda packet — Monterey Park City Council, October 7, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

City Council of Monterey Park
The City Council Acting on Behalf of the Successor Agency of the Former Redevelopment Agency, the Housing Authority, the Monterey Park Financing Authority and the Monterey Park Geologic Hazard Abatement District Agenda
Regular Meeting
Monterey Park City Hall Council Chambers
320 West Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754
Wednesday, October 7, 2026
6:30 PM
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Land Acknowledgment
We would like to acknowledge that the land we inhabit today was once known as Tovangaar, the home of the Gabrieleño-Tongva people. We show our respect to the Gabrieleño-Tongva people, as well as all Indigenous people, past, present, and future, and honor their labor as original caretakers of this land.

We commit to uplifting the Gabrieleño-Tongva people, invite you to acknowledge the history, and join us in caring for this land.

General Information
Documents related to an Agenda item are available to the public in the City Clerk’s Office located at 320 West Newmark Avenue, Monterey Park, CA 91754, during normal business hours.

Visit www.montereypark.ca.gov/agendas for agenda documents, policies, procedures, and instructions for remote participation.

Special Accommodation
Per the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email City Hall at [email protected] or call (626) 307-1359 for reasonable accommodation at least 48 hours before a meeting. Council Chambers are wheelchair accessible.

Viewing a Live Broadcast Meeting
• City’s Cable Channel – MPKTV: AT&T U-verse Channel 99 or Charter Communications Channel 182
• City’s Website – http://www.montereypark.ca.gov/133/City-Council-Meeting-Videos • Zoom – https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83333642600, Meeting ID: 833 3364 2600 Public Participation
• In Person – Council Chambers, 320 W. Newmark Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754.

Page 1 of 208 ends

Complete a guest’s speaker card and submit it to the City Clerk. When called upon, approach the podium.
• Zoom – https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83333642600, Meeting ID: 833 3364 2600 To join the speaking queue, use the “raise hand” feature if using a device. Speakers will be unmuted and called on to speak.
• Telephone – Dial 1(669) 444-9171 or 1(253) 205-0468, enter Meeting ID: 833 3364 2600 and press #. To join the speaking queue, press *9 to raise hand and press *6 to unmute when called on to speak.
• Written Public Comment – Accepted up to 24 hours before the meeting by completing an online form at www.montereypark.ca.gov/writtencomm. Written communications are provided to the City Council and filed as part of the City’s administrative record but not read during the council meeting.

Addressing the Council
Pursuant to Rule 4 of Resolution No. 2026-R23, public comments for all agenda items will be taken at the beginning of the meeting, except public hearing which will be taken at the time it will be heard using the same method for each item. The time allotted is determined by the number of speakers in accordance with the format listed below. If desirable, the Mayor and City Council may change the time limits.

Requests to make public comment or speak on any item other than a public hearing item must be submitted before the Public Comment period begins. Requests to speak on a public hearing item must be submitted before the applicable public hearing begins. No additional speaker requests will be accepted after those times.
• 5 or fewer speakers: 5 minutes each.
• 6–20 speakers: 3 minutes each.
• 21–40 speakers: 2 minutes each.
• 41 or more speakers: 1 minute each.

Live Translation
Meetings may be translated (transcribed or audio) to the language selected. Availability may vary by language and technology platform.
• Wordly – Go to https://attend.wordly.ai/join/ERPR-7201, click on the arrow to select language and then click Attend. Use captions on your device or listen with a headset. • Zoom – Click More (…), select Show Captions, then hover over the Gear icon to choose your language.

Standard of Decorum
Any person addressing the Council who disrupts, disturbs, impedes, or otherwise renders infeasible the meeting’s orderly conduct, who, after a request by the presiding officer, refuses to cease such behavior may be removed from the City Council chambers or remote participation platform.

1. Call to Order
Mayor

2. Flag Salute

Page 2 of 208 ends

The Monterey Park Fire Explorers

3. Roll Call
Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang

4. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested

5. Agenda Revisions and Additions

6. Presentation

6.A. Senator Sasha Renee Perez Legislative Updates

6.B. Urban Forest Management Plan Update

7. Public Comments

8. Staff Communications

8.A. City Clerk's Office

8.B. Fire Department

8.C. Public Works

8.D. Bruggemeyer Library

8.E. Recreation & Community Services

9. Old Business

10. Consent Calendar
All items under the Consent Calendar are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. Specific items may be removed from the Consent Calendar at the request of any member of the City Council for separate consideration.

10.A. Minutes
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the minutes from the special meetings of July 1, 2026 and August 19, 2026, the regular meetings of July 1, 2026, July 15, 2026, August 5, 2026 and August 19, 2026, and the special community meeting of August 11, 2026; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.B. Monthly Investment Report
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the monthly investment report; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Page 3 of 208 ends

10.C. Consideration and possible action to adopt the 2026 Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Monterey Park in accordance with the Political Reform Act It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting the resolution amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.D. Resolutions identifying officials and designating additional employees subject to mandatory ethics and fiscal and financial training requirements It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution identifying officials and designating additional employees subject to mandatory ethics training requirements pursuant to Assembly Bill 1234;

2. Adopting a Resolution identifying officials and designating additional employees subject to mandatory fiscal and financial training requirements pursuant to Senate Bill 827; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.E. SGVCOG Memorandum of Agreement for SB 1383 Services and Related Budget Appropriation
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving an appropriation of $13,464.05 for the Senate Bill (SB 1383) Local Assistance Grant Program;

2. Approving the Memorandum of Agreement with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) in the amount of $14,902.00 for the period of November 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028, and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any related documents, in a form approved by the City Attorney; and

3. Taking such additional, related actions as may be necessary to implement the foregoing actions.

10.F. Request to Amend Agreement No. 1944-A with Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. for City Vehicle Replacements
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute an Amendment to Agreement No. 1944-A with Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. (“Enterprise”), through Sourcewell Contract No. 112025-EFM pursuant to Monterey Park Municipal Code section 3.20.050(4), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for a one-time payment of $204,821 and annual payments not to exceed $290,000 for a five-year term, for a total amount not to exceed $1,654,821, for City vehicle replacements; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.G. Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2229-AC for Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project Update

Page 4 of 208 ends

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2229- AC with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project, increasing the project budget by $1,500,000, from $9,000,000 to $10,500,000;

2. Appropriating $1,500,000 in Measure R funds to the FY 2026-27 budget for the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project;

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.H. Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Accepting grant funds and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in the amount of $192,000 for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP);

2. Adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to receive and appropriate grant funds in Fiscal Year 2026-27; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.I. Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Grant for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Accepting grant funds and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in the amount of $28,500 for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program;

2. Adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to receive and appropriate grant funds in Fiscal Year 2026-27; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.J. Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to apply for, receive and appropriate funds for the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (“SPP”) Grant for proposed improvements to the Barnes Park Pool It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to apply for, receive and appropriate funds for the SPP Grant for proposed improvements to Barnes Park; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.K. Consideration and possible action to adopt a Resolution declaring a local emergency resulting from the developing 2026–2027 El Niño event and authorizing the City Manager to directly negotiate contracts pursuant to Public Contract Code §§ 20168

Page 5 of 208 ends

and 22050
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution, by four-fifths vote, declaring a local emergency resulting from the developing 2026–2027 El Niño event and authorizing the City Manager to directly negotiate contracts for emergency contracting for work necessary to prepare for, prevent, mitigate, respond to, or recover from the impacts of the emergency pursuant to Public Contract Code §§ 20168 and 22050;

2. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve change orders and contingency up to a cumulative amount not to exceed 15% of the contract amount for contracts awarded under the emergency authority provided under the Resolution; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The Resolution and the actions authorized by the Resolution were reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). Based on that review, the Resolution and the actions authorized by the Resolution are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines section 15269(c) to the extent they constitute specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency.

10.L. Waive Further Reading and Adopt an Ordinance Adding Monterey Park Municipal Code § 3.100.130 Regarding Delegated Authority for Subcontractor Substitutions on Public Works Contracts.

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Waiving the second reading and adopting the proposed ordinance; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.M. City Council Consideration of Continued Planning Commission Review of the Deerfield Mixed-Use Development Project
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Waiting for the Planning Commission’s recommendation before hearing the Deerfield Mixed-Use Development Project (“Project”);

2. Noticing a public hearing for the Project before the City Council on November 4, 2026; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City Council’s action on this item does not qualify as a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code sections 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. sections 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”) under CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) because it is an administrative action that will not result in a direct or indirect physical change in the environment. Alternatively, the action is exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3), the common sense exemption because it can be seen with certainty that the action will not have a significant effect on the environment.

Page 6 of 208 ends

10.N. Code Enforcement Officer Appreciation Week Resolution It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution declaring the week of October 4 – October 10, 2026, as Code Enforcement Officer Appreciation Week in Monterey Park; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.O. Banned Books Week Resolution
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a resolution declaring the week of October 4-10, 2026 as Banned Books Week in Monterey Park; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.P. Latina Equal Pay Day Resolution (As Requested by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez) It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the attached resolution; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.Q. Domestic Violence Awareness Month Resolution (As Requested by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez)
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the attached resolution; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

10.R. National Walk & Roll to School Day Resolution (As Requested by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez)
It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the attached resolution; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

11. Public Hearing

12. New Business

13. City Communications (City Council) / Future Agenda Items

14. Closed Session (if Required; City Attorney to Announce)

15. Adjournment

Page 7 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.A.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Maychelle Yee , City Clerk
Subject: Minutes
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The minutes are a record of the official actions taken at the City Council meeting.

Background:

It is recommended that the City Council consider approving the minutes from the special meetings of July 1, 2026 and August 19, 2026, the regular meetings of July 1, 2026, July 15, 2026, August 5, 2026 and August 19, 2026, and the special community meeting of August 11, 2026.

Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A
Fiscal Impact:

N/A
Attachments:

1. Draft Minutes

Page 8 of 208 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Minutes
Staff Report
October 7, 2026

Page 9 of 208 ends

xx-xx
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Minutes
Monterey Park City Council
Financing Authority (MPFA)
Housing Authority (MPHA)
Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD)
Successor Agency (SA)
Special Meeting
July 1, 2026
The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Special Meeting of the Council in Room 266, Second Floor of City Hall, located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Wednesday, July 1, 2026, at 5:30 p.m.

1. Call to Order
Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 5:34 p.m.

2. Roll Call
City Manager Inez Alvarez called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None
Also Present:

City Attorney Karl Berger
Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia
Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Christine Tomikawa Virtually Present:

Assistant City Attorney Tim Campen

3. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested
None.

4. Public Comments
None.

5. Closed Session
Upon conclusion of Closed Session, the Mayor and/or City Attorney will announce any reportable actions in accordance with the Brown Act.

The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 5:43 p.m.

Page 10 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026

5.A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)
Becky Ong v. City of Monterey Park, (filed October 8, 2025) LASC Case No. 25NNCV07161

5.B. Conference with Legal Counsel, Existing Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(d) - Number of Cases: 1 Chan v. City of Monterey Park, LASC Case Number: 25STCP04378 (filed November 13, 2025)

6. Adjournment
The City Council reconvened from Closed Session with all Council Members present.

There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 6:04 p.m.
_________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk
Approved on MM DD, YYYY at the regular City Council Meeting

Page 11 of 208 ends

xx-xx
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment Minutes
Monterey Park City Council
Financing Authority (MPFA)
Housing Authority (MPHA)
Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD)
Successor Agency (SA)
Regular Meeting
July 1, 2026
The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Regular Meeting of the Council in the Council Chamber, located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Wednesday, July 1, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.

The Agenda was amended to add a staff report for Agenda Item No. 12.B.

1. Call to Order
Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 6:33 p.m.

2. Flag Salute
The Monterey Park Fire Explorers led the Flag Salute.

3. Roll Call
City Clerk Maychelle Yee called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None.

Also Present:

City Treasurer Amy Lee
City Manager Inez Alvarez
City Attorney Karl Berger
Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia
Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Christine Tomikawa Director of Community Development Timothy Hou
Director of Recreation and Community Services Robert Aguirre City Librarian Kristin Olivarez
Director of Public Works Shawn Igoe
Police Chief Scott Wiese
Recreation and Community Services Manager Christina Alatorre IT Manager Martin Dinh
Planning Manager Jerry Guevara

Page 12 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Fire Marshal Jessica Estrella
Principal Management Analyst Rebecca Bojorquez
Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang
Management Analyst Anays Navarro
Assistant Deputy City Clerk Helena Cho
Virtually Present:

None.

4. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested
None.

5. Agenda Revisions and Additions
None.

6. Presentation

6.A. Ware Customer Survey Results
Martin Figueroa, Contract Manager with Ware Disposal, alongside Jason Rush, Legislative Director, exhibited a PowerPoint presentation detailing the results of the Ware Customer Service survey. Contract Manager Figueroa provided insights about the survey's purpose of understanding residents’ experiences and satisfaction regarding trash services. He highlighted their success and areas of improvement which include education, communication and greater awareness, and demonstrated an action plan of improvement strategies.

7. Public Comments
• Colin Campbell, Pasadena Chapter Lead for the Mars Society and Founder/CEO of Adapt Inc., a veteran-owned small business in South Pasadena, proposed a regional modernization framework that will bolster the safety and long-term sustainability of Monterey Park, and urged the City Council to consider its endorsement.
• L.S. Szeto raised concerns over the proposed San Gabriel Valley (SGV) Forward project. She claimed the project to be unbuildable, due to violations of the federal public right of way accessibility guidelines and cautioned the City Council, stating the City would be blamed for the project's alleged demise.
• Bill Lam voiced his opinion regarding the now postponed Independence Day celebration, initially set for June 28, 2026. He spoke about past Independence Day celebrations that were held on Fourth of July and requested the celebration be held once again on the day of the Holiday.

Page 13 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026

8. Staff Communications

8.A. Bruggemeyer Library
City Librarian Olivarez presented a PowerPoint presentation detailing a recap of events held at the library during the month of June. She introduced the events occurring for the month of July which includes the Duty, Honor.

Country, Courage Exhibition to honor Asian Americans in military service and summer performances offered through the summer reading program such as the California Joe Magic Show and the Doodlebugs Animal Show. She presented the Spicy Romance Movie Series and Trivia event at the Friends Room and announced the fall registration dates for Literacy of all Monterey Park (LAMP) English classes.

8.B. Fire Department
Fire Marshal Estrella shared a PowerPoint presentation announcing the locations to purchase legal fireworks in the City and detailed tips about fire safety.

8.C. Recreation & Community Services
Recreation and Community Services Manager Alatorre depicted a PowerPoint presentation thanking the residents for celebrating the San Gabriel Valley (SGV) Pride Parade and Festival and the success of the Monterey Park (MPK) Camp Out event. She announced events occurring at the Langley Center, which include a movie screening of the film "The Sandlot", Fédération Internationale de Football Association soccer match viewings and the Independence Day Dance. She advertised upcoming trips for the community to attend, such as the Mama Mia theatrical performance at the Ahmanson Theatre, the Smokey Robinson and Gladys Knight performances at the Hollywood Bowl and the MPK Night at the Dodger Stadium.

Director of Recreation and Community Services Aguirre requested the City Council to consider the approval and adoption of a Resolution recognizing the month of July as Parks Make Life Better Month.

9. Old Business

9.A. Discussion of Updated Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study Findings This report (to the staff report) provides the findings of an updated Inclusionary Housing Ordinance (IHO) feasibility study prepared by Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) evaluating the financial impact of the City’s IHO (Attachment 1 to the staff report). EPS presented prior studies to Council in 2024 and 2025, and their analysis tests whether typical new residential projects—townhomes, condominiums, and multifamily rental apartments—can feasibly support the City’s inclusionary requirements under 2026 market conditions.

Page 14 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
The study finds that most residential development prototypes are not currently financially feasible even without inclusionary requirements. Only townhomes show adequate feasibility at market rates, but even the townhome product type becomes infeasible when the current IHO requirements are applied.

EPS concludes that, under current conditions, the City’s IHO requirements are likely to pose significant financial challenges to new multifamily rental and ownership development. The report provides several policy considerations for the City Council including a recommended in-lieu fee calculation and strategic considerations for implementation.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the report and presentation;

2. Providing direction to staff; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Director of Community Development Hou introduced Chinmay Damle, Urban Planner with Economic and Planning Systems, Inc. Urban Planner Damle, shared a PowerPoint presentation detailing the analysis on feasible residential projects. He elaborated on development prototypes in the City, in-lieu fee calculations and provided strategic considerations for the City Council's deliberation.

Julie Cooper, Principal at Economic and Planning Systems, Inc, virtually present, was available for questions.

Action Taken: By Consenus, the City Council received and filed the report and presentation and directed staff to pause the IHO temporarily to explore further avenues to incentivize housing and took no further action on this item.

Action Taken: Council Member Wong declared a potential Conflict of Interest for Agenda Item No. 10.D, as his property is within 500 feet from the project site, recused himself and did not participate in the item. He also recused himself from the approval of the March 23, 2026 and April 9, 2026 special community meeting minutes for Agenda Item No. 10.A., as he was absent for those meetings. Council Member Yang declared a potential Conflict of Interest for Agenda Item No. 10.D, as her property is within 500 feet from the project site, recused herself and did not

Page 15 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
participate on the item. The City Council approved Agenda Item Nos.: 10.A., 10.B.,

10.C., 10.D., 10.E., 10.F., 10.G. and 10.H. reading resolutions and ordinances by the title only and waiving further reading thereof.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Ngo and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: Thomas Wong for Agenda Item No. 10.A. and 10.D., Elizabeth Yang for Agenda Item No. 10.D.

10.A. Minutes
The minutes are a record of the official actions taken at the City Council meeting.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the minutes from the special meetings of March 4, 2026, March 7, 2026, March 18, 2026, April 1, 2026, April 15, 2026 and April 20, 2026; the regular meetings of March 4, 2026, March 18, 2026, April 1, 2026 and April 15, 2026; and the special community meetings of March 23, 2026 and April 9, 2026; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: Council Member Wong recused himself from the approval of the special community meetings of March 23, 2026 and April 9, 2026, as he was absent from those meetings and did not participate in the item. The City Council approved the recommendation, on Consent Calendar.

10.B. Monthly Investment Report
As of May 31, 2026, invested funds for the City of Monterey Park total $81,373,133.89.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the monthly investment report; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council received and filed the monthly investment report, on Consent Calendar.

Page 16 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026

10.C.Second Amendment to Agreement No. 2527-AA with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

On January 21, 2026, City Council approved the concept and award of a professional services agreement with Kimley-Horn for design services related to the January 21, 2023, memorial project (Project) in the amount of $43,000.

To date, Kimley-Horn has completed the initial design concept and outreach efforts. The Assistant City Manager recommends City Council approve a second amendment to the agreement with Kimley-Horn to provide additional civil engineering services needed for the Project.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a second amendment to agreement no. 2527-AA with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for civil engineering services as part of the January 21, 2023 memorial project; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

10.D. Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Sewer Rehabilitation – Award of Contract Per Resolution No. 2025-R58, the Public Works Director (“Director”) solicited bids for the FY 2025-2026 Sewer Rehabilitation Project, Capital Improvement Project No. 99027. The public bid opening for this project was held on June 2, 2026. Three bids were received: Ramona, Inc., CEM Construction Corporation, and GRBCON, Inc.

The Director recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a public works contract with Ramona, Inc., the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, for the FY 2025-2026 Sewer Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $1,927,467.50 plus $289,120 contingency.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Page 17 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a public works contract, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with Ramona, Inc. in the amount of $1,927,467.50 for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Sewer Rehabilitation, Specification No. 2026-005;

2. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed $289,120, representing approximately 15% of the contract amount; and

3. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: Council Member Wong and Council Member Yang declared a potential Conflict of Interest as their properties are within 500 feet of the proposed project site, recused themselves and did not participate on the item.

The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

10.E.Service Club & Sierra Vista Doors - Award of Contract Per Resolution No. 2026-R43, the Public Works Director (“Director”) solicited bids for the Sierra Vista and Service Club Door Replacement Project, Capital Improvement Project No. 95069 (the “Project”). The Project’s public bid opening was on June 25, 2026, and one bid was received from Vortex Industries, LLC (“Vortex”).

The Director recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Public Works contract with Vortex for the Project in the amount of $71,742 plus $7,174 contingency.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The proposed project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) because it involves the replacement of existing doors with no expansion of the existing use.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a public works contract, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with Vortex Industries, LLC. in the amount of $71,742 for the Sierra Vista and Service Club Door Replacement Project, Specification No. 2025-004;

2. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed $7,174 over the total contract amount; and

3. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Page 18 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

10.F. Identifying a tax rate for collecting voter authorized property taxes for employee retirement benefits based on the assessed property valuation established by the County Assessor’s Office
The City of Monterey Park’s retirement costs are funded in part by a special voter-approved property tax. Each year the City is required to establish a tax rate to generate the retirement property tax based on the assessed valuation of taxable property established by the County Assessor’s Office.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution identifying the tax rate and amount of tax revenue required to fulfill the voters’ intent in funding the City’s retirement system; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026- R53, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2026-R53
A Resolution identifying the amount of tax revenue required to fulfill the voters’ intent in funding the City’s retirement system during fiscal year 2026- 2027 and authorizing the levy of appropriate taxes

10.G.Professional Services Agreement with Mainstream Unlimited, LLC to provide Safety Training and Risk Management Consulting Services The City is a member of Public Risk Innovation, Solutions, and Management (PRISM), a risk sharing pool, to purchase lines of insurance for the City workers' compensation, general liability, auto physical, and property. As part of its participation in PRISM, the City has access to vendors to provide training and consulting services to assist with risk and liability. Mainstream Unlimited, LLC (Mainstream) is one of the recommended vendors that will assist the City with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) training for City staff and review policies related to the City's risk management programs.

Page 19 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a standard professional services agreement with Mainstream Unlimited, LLC in a form approved by the City Attorney, to provide safety training and risk management consulting services; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation, on Consent Calendar.

10.H.Parks Make Life Better Month Resolution
During July, the Recreation and Community Services Department celebrates "Parks Make Life Better” Month. By designating July as "Parks Make Life Better" Month, the City of Monterey Park’s Recreation and Community Services Department urges all residents to enjoy and recognize our parks' social, physical, mental, economic, environmental, and community benefits.

As we observe "Parks Make Life Better" Month, we recognize the vital contributions of our employees and volunteers, who all contribute to making parks and recreation facilities a great place to visit. These dedicated staff and volunteers keep our parks clean and safe for visitors and coordinate and organize special events, childcare, summer day camp, swim lessons, educational classes, senior activities, and health and fitness programs. They ensure that parks and recreation facilities are safe and accessible places to enjoy.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution declaring the month of July as “Parks Make Life Better” Month in the City of Monterey Park; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026- R54, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2026-R54
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Monterey Park declaring the month of July 2026 as Parks Make Life Better Month

Page 20 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026

11. Public Hearing

11.A. HUD Program Year 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) funds to the City of Monterey Park for the purpose of developing viable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environments, and by expanding economic opportunities, specifically for low- and moderate-income people.

For Program Year (PY) 2026-2027, the City will receive approximately $571,332 in CDBG funds and $302,097.03 in HOME funds from HUD. The purpose of this public hearing is to inform residents about the CDBG and HOME programs, present funding recommendations for public review, and solicit public input regarding community needs and priorities prior to final Council consideration and HUD submission of the Annual Action Plan.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Conducting a public hearing and receiving public comments and testimony on the Program Year (PY) 2026-2027 Annual Action Plan (AAP);

2. Approving and authorizing the submittal of the PY 2026-2027 AAP, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) funding recommendations;

3. Authorizing the City Manager to execute all appropriate and necessary documents to receive funding, implement approved use, and make necessary budget adjustments based on the Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) final allocation amount;

4. Authorizing the City Manager to execute sub-recipient agreements with the non-profit organizations receiving CDBG and HOME allocations in the Annual Action Plan;

5. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Director of Community Development Hou introduced Management Analyst Navarro to present the staff report.

Management Analyst Navarro articulated a staff report regarding the CDBG and HOME funds received for the 2026-2027 fiscal year and their proposed implementation program for the City.

Priscilla Dávila, Principal from Priscila Dávila & Associates, Inc was available for questions.

Page 21 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Action Taken: The City Council opened the public hearing at 8:14 p.m., received no registered speakers, closed the public hearing at 8:26 p.m. and approved the recommendations.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Ngo and seconded by Council Member Yang, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

11.B.Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan, including the Water Shortage Contingency Plan The Urban Water Management Planning Act (Water Code §10610 et seq.) requires urban water suppliers to prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) every five years. The City’s 2025 UWMP evaluates projected water demands, available water supplies, and water shortage response strategies over a 20-year planning horizon and includes the Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) required by California law.

Adoption of the UWMP satisfies the City’s statutory planning obligations and supports long-term water supply reliability.

A public hearing has been properly noticed in accordance with California law to consider adoption of the Plan and to receive public input.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The proposed action is statutorily exempt from CEQA pursuant to Water Code Section 10652 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(v), as adoption of the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan, and the Water Shortage Contingency Plan contained therein, does not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing, receiving public testimony, and closing the public hearing; and

2. Adopting the resolution approving the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan, including the Water Shortage Contingency Plan contained therein, and finding consistency with the City’s General Plan.

Page 22 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Discussion: Director of Public Works Igoe presented an oral staff report detailing the proposed 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and its evaluation of projected water demands, available water supplies and water shortage response strategies.

Action Taken: The City Council opened the public hearing at 8:27 p.m., received no registered speakers, closed the public hearing at 8:32 p.m. and approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026-R55.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Yang and seconded by Council Member Wong, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None
Resolution No. 2026-R55
A Resolution adopting the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan, including the Water Shortage Contingency Plan, and authorizing submittal to the California Department of Water Resources

12. New Business

12.A. Los Palos Incident Local Emergency Update
Discussion: Principal Management Analyst Bojorquez presented a PowerPoint presentation regarding the city’s efforts and response to the local emergency that was declared on June 23, 2026 due to the Los Palos Incident. She elaborated on the City's implementation of an air purifier reimbursement program, the requirements to participate, and the deadline to submit the application.

Action Taken: By Consensus, the City Council received the oral report and took no further action on this item.

12.B. Adopting a Resolution certifying the results of the June 2, 2026 Special Municipal Election
The City held its special election on June 2, 2026 for consideration of a proposition placed on the ballot by the City Council, Measure NDC regarding prohibiting data centers citywide. The election was consolidated with the Statewide Primary Election, and voters approved Measure NDC.

Page 23 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a resolution certifying the results of the June 2, 2026 Special Election;

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Deputy City Clerk Trang shared a proposed resolution for consideration that certifies the results of the June 2, 2026 Special Election.

Action Taken: The City Council approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026- R56.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Ngo and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None
Resolution No. 2026-R56
A Resolution declaring the results of the Special Election held June 2, 2026

12.C. Ballot Proposition to amend the existing Monterey Park Transient Occupancy Tax
This report reviews a proposition that the City Council may place on the November 3, 2026, general municipal election ballot. The City Council may choose to place the proposition onto the ballot or take no action. If the City Council places the tax proposition onto the ballot, voters may adopt such proposition with a simple majority. If voter-approved, the proposition would be a general tax and revenue generated the tax may be used for any general municipal purpose. This proposition would not impose a new tax; rather, it would amend existing taxes, i.e., those already imposed. Four affirmative votes are needed to place this proposition onto the ballot.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

These actions are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 2100, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.) because they establish rules and procedures related to government funding mechanisms and election administration; do not involve any commitment to a specific project which could result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and constitute organizational or administrative activities

Page 24 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

Accordingly, the proposition proposed and related actions do not constitute a “project” that requires environmental review (see specifically, 14 CCR § 15378(b)(4-5)).

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting, by at least four affirmative votes, a Resolution placing a proposition on the November 3, 2026, ballot, which, if adopted by a majority of voters, would amend the City’s existing Transient Occupancy Tax;

2. Determining whether to designate person(s) for filing an argument favoring the ballot proposition;

3. Adopting a Resolution requesting that the City Attorney prepare an impartial analysis for the ballot proposition;

4. Adopting a Resolution establishing requirements for ballot arguments for City measures;

5. Adopting a Resolution supporting the ballot measure; and

6. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Director of Finance Garcia depicted a PowerPoint presentation detailing a proposition to amend the existing Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) for its placement on the upcoming ballot for the November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election. She commented about the department's outreach efforts to help community members better understand potential impacts/support the proposed measure and compared the TOT rates in other cities. She announced an addendum, containing a proposed amendment on the language of the proposed ballot measure to state:
"Shall the ordinance maintaining City of Monterey Park’s services like fire, police, 911 response; keeping public areas safe/clean; helping prevent property crimes/human trafficking in Monterey Park; repairing streets/ potholes; for other city services; by increasing the transient occupancy tax paid only by hotel/motel guests from 13% to 14%, and short-term rental guests, from 13% to 16%, providing approximately $600,000 annually until ended by voters; requiring audits, spending disclosure, local control over all funds, be adopted?"
Rob Korinke, Principal of GrassrootsLab, virtually present, was available for questions.

Action Taken: The City approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026-R57 as amended to modify the language of the ballot measure, Resolution No. 2026- R58, Resolution No. 2026-R59 and Resolution No. 2026-R60.

Page 25 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Motion: Moved by Council Member Yang and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None
Resolution No. 2026-R57
A Resolution requesting the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors place a ballot proposition on the City’s November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election ballot, which is to be consolidated with the Statewide General Election pursuant to Elections Code § 10403
Resolution No. 2026-R58
A Resolution directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the proposition authorizing amendment of the Transient Occupancy Tax to fund general municipal services
Resolution No. 2026-R59
A Resolution establishing requirements for ballot arguments filed with the City Clerk to be included with voter information for the General Municipal Election on November 3, 2026
Resolution No. 2026-R60
A Resolution of the Monterey Park City Council supporting ballot proposition needed to maintain Monterey Park’s long-term financial stability and locally controlled general services by increasing Transient Occupancy Tax from 13% to 14% for hotels and motels and from 13% to 16% for short-term rentals, raising approximately $600,000 annually to the general fund until ended by voters

13. City Communications (City Council) / Future Agenda Items Council Member Yang thanked Congresswoman Judy Chu for presenting a $1.75 million dollar check for Fire Station 61 and 63, commented on her attendance at the Vacant to Vibrant Land-Use Workshops and at the closing ceremony of Happy Days School. She talked about her tour with Garvey Unified School District Board Member Andy Yam at The Alta, an art space in Montebello, expressed her gratitude to the staff that worked on the Mayoral Installation on June 30, 2026 and wished the community a happy Fourth of July.

Council Member Ngo spoke about the unveiling of Monterey Park’s new mural commemorating the 250th celebration of the United States at Barnes Park and shared words of appreciation to Council Member Yang for her service as Mayor.

Page 26 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 1, 2026
Council Member Wong echoed his appreciation regarding the Mayoral Installation on June 30, 2026, and wished a Happy Birthday to Mayor Lo, City Manager Alvarez and Assistant City Manager Garcia.

Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez thanked Council Member Yang for her service as Mayor and reported his and Fire Chief Hing's visit to the Lineage Logistics Center to gain perspective on the intensity of the fire. He commented on the closure of Happy Days School and their 80th anniversary celebration.

Mayor Lo extended a Happy Birthday to City Manager Alvarez and to Assistant City Manager Garcia and echoed his attendance to the same events as his fellow Council Members. He expressed his appreciation to the residents and city staff and wished the community a happy Fourth of July.

14. Closed Session (if Required; City Attorney to Announce) None.

15. Adjournment
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 9:09 p.m.
_____________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk
Approved on MM DD, YYYY at the regular City Council Meeting

Page 27 of 208 ends

xx-xx
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment Minutes
Monterey Park City Council
Financing Authority (MPFA)
Housing Authority (MPHA)
Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD)
Successor Agency (SA)
Regular Meeting
July 15, 2026
The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Regular Meeting of the Council in the Council Chamber, located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Wednesday, July 15, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.

1. Call to Order
Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.

2. Flag Salute
Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez led the Flag Salute.

3. Roll Call
City Clerk Maychelle Yee called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None.

Also Present:

City Manager Inez Alvarez
City Attorney Karl Berger
Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Christine Tomikawa Director of Community Development Timothy Hou
City Librarian Kristin Olivarez
Director of Public Works Shawn Igoe
Police Chief Scott Wiese
Fire Chief Jason Hing
Finance Services Manager Laura Borjon
Engineering Manager/Transtech Consultant Ziad Mazboudi
Recreation and Community Services Manager Christina Alatorre IT Manager Martin Dinh
Fire Marshall Jessica Estrella
Principal Management Analyst Rebecca Bojorquez

Page 28 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
Code Compliance Supervisor Reymundo Lozano
Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang
Assistant Deputy City Clerk Helena Cho
Virtually Present: None.

4. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested
None.

5. Agenda Revisions and Additions
None.

6. Presentation
None.

7. Public Comments
• Elisa Surmont raised her concerns about fences around city owned lots.

She stated the City should reevaluate the permit process for fences as it is outdated and should include considerations for unique-sized lots. • Dawn Rock shared information about Align With Purpose’s (AWP) fundraising event to support the rebuilding of the Barnes Park Aquatic Center at Dave and Busters in Arcadia.
• Winnie Lau expressed her worries regarding her new neighbor requesting to build a 6-foot line fence, claiming the fence would block the view of her home and natural breeze that cools her home during the summer. She asked the City Council to review the Monterey Park Municipal Code (MPMC) governing residential fences in hillside neighborhoods to cater to homeowner’s right to build a fence and preserve the unique characteristics of homes in hillside communities.
• Russell Fairbanks shared his appreciation to the City Council and provided his opinion on obstructed views caused by fences in hillside communities in Monterey park.
• Chris Fairbanks expressed his thanks to the City Council. He shared his concern regarding the potential risks on the health, property value, and aesthetics caused by fencing regulations on hillside communities in the MPMC.

Page 29 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
• Matthew Meehan spoke about his experience with distracted drivers while crossing the intersection on West Riggin Street and Gerhart Avenue. He suggested the City research possible safety protections and street improvements for pedestrians.

8. Staff Communications

8.A.Public Works
Director of Public Works Igoe shared a PowerPoint presentation on the upcoming City of Monterey Park Community Clean Up Day at George Elder Park where residents can drop off bulky items and e-waste at no cost.

8.B.Police Department
Police Chief Wiese presented a PowerPoint presentation about the 2026 National Night Out at Barnes Park and shared the calls for service statistics for the 4th of July Holiday event.

8.C. City Manager's Office
City Manager Alvarez conducted a PowerPoint presentation asking residents for feedback on the potential act of renaming Los Angeles County Assets bearing the name Cesar Chavez.

9. Old Business

9.A. Consideration of Designation of Person(s) for Filing an Argument in Favor of the Monterey Park Transient Occupancy Tax Ballot Proposition By majority vote, the City Council may authorize one or more of its members to file a written argument regarding the measure and to adopt provisions to provide for the filing of rebuttal arguments.

The following persons or entities may submit an argument, not exceeding 300 words, for or against the measure:

1. The City Council;

2. Council members authorized by the City Council;

3. An individual voter eligible to vote on the measure (i.e., a registered voter in the city);

4. A bona fide citizens' association; or

5. Any combination of voters and associations.

Page 30 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
Each argument must include the printed name(s) and signature(s) of each author. If an organization submits an argument, it must include the organization's name and the printed name and signature of at least one principal officer who is an author of the argument. No more than five signatures may appear with an argument. If more than five authors sign an argument, only the first five signatures will be printed with the voter materials.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Accordingly, the proposition proposed and related actions do not constitute a “project” that requires environmental review (see specifically, 14 CCR § 15378(b)(4-5)).

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Determining whether to designate person(s) for filing an argument favoring the ballot proposition; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: City Council approved the recommendation and designation of Mayor Lo and Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez as the designated persons for filing an argument favoring the ballot proposition.

Motion: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez and seconded by Council Member Yang, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Page 31 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026

9.B. Discussion of Short-Term Rentals
In 2020, Monterey Park adopted rules to govern short-term rentals— dwellings, or rooms within them, rented to guests for fewer than 30 consecutive days. These rules, now part of the Monterey Park Municipal Code, are meant to preserve the character of residential neighborhoods, limit the side effects of short-term renting, and give the City tools to address nuisances. Since then, the City has found these rules difficult to enforce. Gaps in permitting, licensing, tax collection, and neighborhood protection have become apparent. Recent legislation provides new tools that the City may wish to utilize to help resolve enforcement challenges.

On July 1, 2026, the Council voted to place a measure on the November 3, 2026 ballot that would raise the City’s transient occupancy tax (TOT) on shortterm rentals from 13% to 16%. If a majority of voters approve it, the increase is expected to generate roughly $200,000 in additional revenue each year for City services.

The State enacted the Short-Term Rental Facilitator Act, which strengthens local enforcement. Among other things, it lets a city obtain the physical address of each rental advertised on a booking platform and gives the city full authority to audit the taxes those rentals owe.

Finally, staff has identified several provisions of the City’s current short-term rental rules that the Council may wish to update – for example, improving definitions, spelling out which types of rentals are prohibited, and setting clearer operating standards.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Receive and file this report and the accompanying presentation: and

2. Take any additional related action it considers appropriate.

Discussion: Community Development Director Hou shared a PowerPoint presentation on the history of short-term rentals and regulations/requirements in the City of Monterey Park for short-term rentals. City Council engaged in a discussion regarding the investigation timeline of short-term rental complaints.

Action Taken: By Consensus, the City council received and filed the report.

Page 32 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
Action Taken: The City Council approved Agenda Item Nos. 10.A., 10.B., 10.C. and 10.D. reading resolutions and ordinances by the title only and waiving further reading thereof.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Ngo, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

10.A. BOA Amendment – Fire Station 61
The City Council, on March 4, 2026, awarded BOA a professional service agreement for the preparation of plans, specifications and engineer’s estimates (“PS&E”) for Fire Station 61 Remodeling Project (the “Project”).

During design, the City determined that additional services are necessary to incorporate ADA related improvements that were not initially incorporated into the Project’s original scope of work. BOA provided a proposal for the additional scope in the amount of $17,200. Approval of the proposed amendment would increase the contract to a total amount not to exceed $123,900.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a first Amendment to Agreement No. 2538-A with Black, O’Dowd & Associates, dba BOA Architecture (“BOA”), in a form approved by
the City Attorney, for an additional amount not to exceed $17,200; and

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation, on Consent Calendar.

10.B. BOA Amendment – Council Chambers
The City Council, on July 16, 2025, awarded BOA Architecture a professional service agreement for the preparation of plans, specifications and engineer’s estimates (“PS&E”) for City Hall Council Chamber and restroom remodeling project (the “Project”).

Page 33 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
BOA’s original scope of work was limited to the Council Chambers. The first amendment added services for rear conference room, including ADA improvements to the rear restroom, relocation of the AV room, and additional safety measures. During design, the City determined that the existing skylights at the rear of the Council Chambers should be replaced with a permanent roof assembly. Amendment No. 2 would add the design services necessary to incorporate those improvements into the Project's construction documents. BOA submitted a proposal for the additional services in the amount of $10,100. Approval of the proposed amendment would increase the contract to an amount not to exceed $164,400.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Second Amendment to Agreement No. 2497- A with Black, O’Dowd & Associates, dba BOA Architecture (“BOA”), in a form approved
by the City Attorney, for an additional amount not to exceed $10,100; and

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation, on Consent Calendar.

10.C. Memorandum of Agreement for the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program and Watershed Management Program for the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area for Fiscal Years 2026 – 2031
The City participates in the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Group (ULAR WMG), a collaborative group consisting of nineteen jurisdictions working together to comply with Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements established by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board). The ULAR WMG jointly implements the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program (CIMP) and Watershed Management Program (WMP) required under the MS4 Permit.

The existing Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) governing implementation of the CIMP and WMP expires on June 30, 2026. The proposed MOA would establish an initial three-year agreement term beginning July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029, with up to two additional, optional one-year extensions upon mutual agreement of the participating agencies.

Page 34 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
The proposed MOA provides for continued regional coordination, monitoring, reporting, and compliance planning activities required under the MS4 permit.

Participation in the regional program allows the City to share costs and technical resources with neighboring jurisdictions, resulting in significant cost savings compared to independently implementing these highly technical MS4 requirements.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City reviewed the environmental impacts of the proposed action under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). The proposed action is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §§ 15262, 15306, 15307, and 15308. The project involves comprehensive data collection efforts to monitor water quality in downstream receiving waters. The data collected will determine whether additional actions are necessary to protect natural resources and the environment.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute the Memorandum of Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to share costs in implementing the Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Program and Watershed Management Program for the Upper Los Angeles River Watershed Management Area for Fiscal Years 2026 2031; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation, on Consent Calendar.

10.D. Resolution approving FY 2026-2027 City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary Schedule
California law and the City's Municipal Code requires the City to maintain a comprehensive salary schedule listing all full-time and part-time employee classifications with the associated salary ranges in a single document approved by the City Council (2 Cal. Code Regs. § 570.5; Muni. Code Chap.

2.36.) In 2025, the City Council approved various memoranda of understanding ("MOUs") with the City's bargaining units. The MOUs approved by the City Council provide a Cost-of-Living Adjustment ("COLA") for FY 2026-2027. The Director is also requesting approval to increase parttime classification salary ranges to keep in line with California's minimum wage increases. The resolution approves the revised comprehensive salary schedule with the COLA salary range increases and include salary range increases for part-time classifications.

Page 35 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution approving the revised FY 2026-2027 City of Monterey Park Comprehensive Salary Schedule;

2. Approving the Revised Part-Time Classification Salary Ranges; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation, and approved and adopted Resolution 2026-R61, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2026-R61
A Resolution approving the revised salary ranges for City employees and authorizing the city manager to implement such changes in the City's salary schedule

11. Public Hearing

11.A. Consideration of Costs Resulting from Abating Weed Nuisances and Authorizing Collection via Special Assessment
On February 4, 2026, the City Council determined that weeds, brush, rubbish, refuse and dirt maintained on certain private properties in the City constitute a public nuisance. The Los Angeles County Department of Agriculture Commissioner/Weights and Measures ("County") is contracted to provide weed abatement services to the City. The County compiled its annual list of properties within the City which contain, or have the potential to contain weeds, brush or other flammable materials sufficient to be considered a fire hazard ("the Weed Abatement Declaration List"). People identified as owning property on the Weed Abatement Declaration List were provided sufficient notice to either protest their inclusion thereon or voluntarily remove the nuisance conditions identified on their property. The deadlines for voluntary compliance or protest have passed, and the County has abated the noncompliant properties on the Weed Abatement Declaration List.

The final step in the County's Weed Abatement process is for the Council to consider approving the County's costs related to abatement and directing that these costs be collected via special assessment.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing, receiving public comment, closing the public hearing;

2. Adopting the attached Resolution approving the Weed Abatement Clearance Charge List and authorizing collection of such costs through special assessment; and

Page 36 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Fire Marshall Estrella presented an oral staff report on the cost review assessment of the City’s Weed Abatement Program.

Action Taken: Council Member Yang declared a potential Conflict of Interest as her property is on the Weed Abatement List, recused herself and did not participate on the item. The City Council opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m., received no registered speakers, closed the public hearing at 7:46 p.m. and approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026-R62.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Ngo, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: Elizabeth Yang
Resolution No. 2026-R62
A Resolution confirming the Itemized Weed Abatement Charge list of weed abatement costs and directing the Los Angeles County Agricultural Commissioner to collect these costs through property tax billings

12. New Business

12.A.Vacant to Vibrant Community Engagement Outreach Report and Recommendations for Consideration and Request for Direction The “Vacant to Vibrant” community engagement initiative was launched in June 2026 to address persistent community concerns about economic development and challenges with housing affordability. Community engagement feedback shows support for allowing housing on vacant and underused commercial and industrial sites and strong concern about vacant properties, access to amenities, and housing opportunities.

In response to community engagement efforts and the outreach report, staff seeks City Council direction on a concept to create housing overlays throughout the City to provide housing development flexibility to spark economic investment in specific commercial areas. If the concept is deemed appropriate, the City Council would need to seek voter approval to amend the Land Use and Urban Design Element (“LUE”) and its land use policy map to identify the commercial and industrial areas where a housing overlay designation may be applied as an optional designation. As a concept, the overlay would only create an option for alternative zoning in limited areas and any application to activate the overlay zoning would remain subject to the City

Page 37 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
Council’s discretionary approval and required public hearings. This report summarizes those findings, discusses the concept for creating housing overlays and asks the City Council to provide direction, including whether staff should prepare documents and return for City Council consideration of a proposition in time for the November 2026 ballot.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the Vacant to Vibrant community engagement outreach report (Attachment 1 to the staff report);

2. Providing direction to craft a concept creating housing overlays throughout the City by amending the Land Use and Urban Design Element to add a land use policy map identifying commercial and industrial areas where such a housing overlay designation may be applied (Attachment 2 to the staff report);

3. Providing direction regarding placing a proposition to effect that amendment on the November 2026 ballot for voter ratification, consistent with the voter-approval requirement established by Measure JJ; and

4. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Public Speakers:
• Steven Kung submitted a public speaker card but was not present when his name was called.
• Matthew Meehan shared his support for this proposed proposition for more housing opportunities where there are vacancies in the community.
• The City Clerk’s Office received and filed a written communication from Bryan Mercke. He showed support for the proposed housing overlay.

Discussion: Director of Community Development Hou alongside Consultant Dana Sovinec from Tripepi Smith shared a PowerPoint Presentation on the Vacant to Vibrant Community Engagement Outreach Report. Consultant Sovinec discussed newspaper/social media promotion, summary of in-person workshops, and data on community feedback. Director of Community Development Hou presented a housing overlay concept for new housing options in Monterey Park and requested direction from the City Council on a proposed amendment to the Land Use Element, Measure JJ in 2020.

The City Council ensued in a discussion regarding the specifics of the housing overlay concept and how it will affect future city development.

Page 38 of 208 ends

xx-xx
July 15, 2026
Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations and directed staff to bring back for consideration a proposition for the November 2026 ballot.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Yang, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

13. City Communications (City Council) / Future Agenda Items Council Member Ngo reported his attendance to the Asian Pacific Islanders Veterans Exhibit at the Bruggemeyer Library on July 3, 2026 and invited the residents to attend.

Council Member Wong spoke of his attendance to the “Faith in the Future” Mural unveiling at Barnes Park in celebration of the 250th celebration of the United States of America.

Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez noted his attendance to the Library Foundations' reopening of the bookstore, the Montebello Housing Development Corporation Workshop for first time homebuyers, and the National Association of Latino Elected Officials Conference.

Mayor Lo shared his attendance to the API Veterans Exhibit, “Faith in the Future” Mural Unveiling at Barnes Park, the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) watch party at Barnes Park, and the Annual Commemoration of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident.

14. Closed Session (if Required; City Attorney to Announce) None.

15. Adjournment
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 8:41 p.m.
_____________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk
Approved on MM DD, YYYY at the regular City Council meeting.

Page 39 of 208 ends

xx-xx
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Minutes
Monterey Park City Council
Financing Authority (MPFA)
Housing Authority (MPHA)
Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD)
Successor Agency (SA)
Regular Meeting
August 5, 2026
The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Regular Meeting of the Council in the Council Chamber, located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Wednesday, August 5, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.

1. Call to Order
Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 6:40 p.m.

2. Flag Salute
The Monterey Park Fire Explorers led the flag salute.

3. Roll Call
City Clerk Maychelle Yee called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None
Also Present:

City Treasurer Amy Lee
City Manager Inez Alvarez
City Attorney Karl Berger
Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia
Director of Finance Martha Garcia
Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Christine Tomikawa Director of Community Development Timothy Hou
Director of Recreation and Community Services Robert Aguirre City Librarian Kristin Olivarez
Police Chief Scott Wiese
Fire Chief Jason Hing
Police Captain Bob Hung
Fire Battalion Chief Jonathan Gin
Finance Manager Laura Borjon
Public Works Manager Xochitl Tipan
Senior Planner Eliana Muñoz

Page 40 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
Principal Management Analyst Rebecca Bojorquez
Recreation and Community Services Supervisor Guillermo Chavez Recreation and Community Services Coordinator Alejandra Espinosa Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang
Assistant Deputy City Clerk Helena Cho
Virtually present:

Engineering Manager/Transtech Consultant Ziad Mazboudi

4. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested
None.

5. Agenda Revisions and Additions
Mayor Lo announced the addition of the Police Department as Agenda Item No.

8.C. to the Agenda and requested the item to be heard after Agenda Item No. 6.A.

6. Presentation

6.A. Recognition of Fire Department Explorers
Fire Battalion Chief Gin shared words of appreciation to Demetrius Hernandez, Ryan Emison, Nathan De Leon, Jaiden Romero and Brandon Campos for their participation in the Sidewalk CPR events. The City Council disseminated certificates to the Fire Explorers for their dedication to civic duty.

7. Public Comments
This item was heard after Agenda Item No. 8.C.
• Bosco Woo expressed disapproval of Automated License Plate Readers (ALPR) and the privacy risks they may pose to the community. He noted the growing backlash against Flock Safety and pointed out that other agencies have ended their contracts with the company.
• Caleb Swyers explained that the concern isn't with the Police Department or the City, but with Flock Safety itself. He felt the City should remove ALPR cameras altogether, since there's no clear evidence the data collected won't be misused.
• Steven Kung voiced distrust that other agencies could misuse data gathered from ALPR cameras and argued that most residents who supported Measure NDC do not support Monterey Park renewing its contract with Flock Safety.

Page 41 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
• Jesse Damon described ALPR cameras as a powerful tool that enables cross-agency data sharing and has been misused in the past. He encouraged the City to invest in effective public safety tools that don't rely on ALPR.
• Barbara Ngai discussed ALPR's potential to evolve into a nationwide surveillance and profiling system.
• Jeremy Fisher referenced an alleged leaked document from Flock Safety instructing public safety agencies on how to market their systems and questioned why the City is considering renewing its contract when other agencies, such as City of Los Angeles, have already ended theirs. • Emily Chu asked the City not to renew its contract with Flock Safety, arguing that ALPR cameras don't effectively prevent crime. • Hrag Balian pointed to the City Council's earlier success in banning data centers citywide and urged the City Council to apply that same approach to reject renewal of the Flock Safety contract.
• Dave Jones shared concerns about the alleged lack of accountability, local control, and transparency associated with Flock Safety. • Jayah Bocanegra raised concerns about the lack of greenery in Monterey Park and recommended planting more trees along Atlantic Time Square.

She explained that restoring native ecosystems in public parks would help bring back indigenous species displaced by development. • Matthew Eitzan echoed distrust in Flock Safety, stating there's no real guarantee that ALPR data won't be misused.
• Deb Simone showed an image of an ALPR camera positioned in front of her home, asked that the Flock Safety contract not be renewed, cited the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and argued that police do not have the right to photograph her vehicle without consent or a warrant. • Clotilde Jang argued that ALPR surveillance networks like this one violate Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights and recommended against renewing the Flock Safety contract given serious civil liberties concerns tied to the data being collected.
• Joyce Vega referenced George Orwell's 1984 as a warning against totalitarianism, stating that mass surveillance is not the answer to community safety.

Page 42 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
• Ali Mims shared her perspective on allegations regarding Flock Safety’s partnership with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), stating that camera surveillance won't make residents safer.
• Kahn offered his view on the recent ALPR-related allegations and the updated public comment procedures in City Council meetings. • Adam Zheng voiced support for renewing the Flock Safety contract, stating that saving even one life justifies a small sacrifice of privacy. • Dawn Rock announced Align With Purpose's (AWP) upcoming fundraiser at Dave and Buster's in the City of Arcadia to support rebuilding the Barnes Park pool.
• Humaira argued that renewing the ALPR contract would affect not just the City of Monterey Park, but surrounding cities as well, noting that other agencies may not be as trustworthy as the Monterey Park Police Department.
• Sam K shared his views on the new public comment procedures in City Council meetings and asked the Council to revisit the issue at a future meeting.
• Kelly Foster expressed frustration over traffic congestion on Potrero Grande and Markland Ave caused by ongoing construction, which has made it difficult for her family to access their driveway.
• Roxana Farahani discussed the new public comment procedures in City Council meetings and asked that the Flock Safety contract not be renewed, stating that resident safety should come first.
• Mistress Jessica shared thoughts on surveillance and privacy standards for California residents in relation to ALPR camera use.
• Nancy Nguyen voiced support for Agenda Item No. 9.A. and thanked Community Development Director Hou and City staff for their guidance on zoning matters.
• Jocielly Aure cited past cases where the MPPD solved crimes without relying on surveillance and asked that the Flock Safety contract not be renewed.
• Josephine Kim provided background on Flock Safety and the purpose of ALPR cameras, stating that the issue lies not with the technology itself but with managing the data it collects.

Page 43 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
• Christal Lee thanked City staff for hosting a successful Vacant-to-Vibrant workshop and asked that the Flock Safety contract not be renewed, noting that concerns about mass surveillance extend well beyond Monterey Park to a national scale.
• Rachel Kim submitted a speaker card but was not present when called. • Paul Lange commented on Agenda Item No. 9.A., asking whether the City is still in a period where affordable housing requirements for developers or related in-lieu fees remain suspended. He urged the City to pursue solutions to the housing crisis and create opportunities for organizations and advocates working on low-income housing.

8. Staff Communications

8.A. Bruggemeyer Library
This item was heard after Agenda Item No. 10.E.

Senior Children’s Librarian Blake shared a PowerPoint presentation summarizing the previous events that occurred for the month of July. She introduced the year-round reading program, "1,000 Books Before Kindergarten" to encourage early literacy and announced upcoming programming for the month of August, which includes: a Back-to-School UNO Tournament, a movie screening of the film, "My Favorite Season" and Literacy for All Monterey Park classes for the Fall season.

8.B. Recreation & Community Services Department
Recreation and Community Services Program Coordinator Sausa presented a PowerPoint presentation, thanking the residents for attending the Mama Mia performance at the Ahmanson Theater and the Smokey Robinson and Gladys Knight concert at the Hollywood Bowl. She spoke about the MPK Night at the Dodger Stadium, and Langley Center programs including screening of "The Hunger Games", a night out event with full dinner and live entertainment, and the Country Line Dance. She also announced the final date for Summer Movies in the Park, the Barnes Park Extended Day Care program, the 9/11 Patriot Day Ceremony and Monster Mash.

Page 44 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026

8.C.Police Department
This item was added during Agenda Revisions and Additions and heard after Agenda Item No. 6.A.

Police Chief Wiese presented a PowerPoint presentation thanking the residents for a successful National Night Out. He announced the upcoming special community meeting scheduled for August 11, 2026, at Monterey Highlands Elementary School regarding Automated License Plate Recognition system (ALPR) and addressing questions the public may have concerning the use of the ALPR system by the Monterey Park Police Department.

9. Old Business

9.A. Consideration and possible action to place a proposition on the November 3, 2026 ballot amending the Land Use and Urban Design Element to create HOME overlays in the City’s commercial and industrial areas, as identified on a land use policy map, and to direct preparation of the implementing HOME Overlay Zoning regulations
On July 15, 2026, after receiving the “Vacant to Vibrant” community engagement summary, the City Council directed staff to return with the documents necessary to create HOME (Housing Overlay – Mixed Environments) overlays throughout the City and to place a ballot proposition effecting that change before the voters at the November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election. If approved by voters, the proposed proposition would amend the Land Use and Urban Design Element (the “LUE”) to identify the commercial and industrial areas where a HOME land use designation may be applied. A separately adopted resolution would identify areas within the City’s jurisdiction that may utilize the HOME land use designation. That resolution would be ratified by voters through the HOME Proposition.

The ballot proposition would not itself adopt zoning regulations. If the voters approve it, the City Council may then adopt the implementing HOME (Housing Overlay – Mixed Environments) zoning regulations by ordinance. Thereafter, a HOME zoning overlay would be activated on a particular parcel only through approval by the City Council, following public hearings and community input.

Activation of the HOME zoning overlay would not apply automatically; it would be an optional designation, applied project by project, and every step after voter approval would remain within the City Council’s discretion. The last day to place a measure on the November 3, 2026 ballot is August 7, 2026 (Elections Code § 9222), and this matter is presented now so the City Council may act within that deadline.

Page 45 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The City Council is required to conduct environmental review of matters it places onto the ballot pursuant to Elections Code § 9222. Placing this matter onto the November 3, 2026 ballot is not subject to further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.) for the reasons stated in Section 4 of the draft Proposition. Amending the LUE by voter proposition is a legislative act that establishes policy for future development; it does not approve any particular project and does not commit the City to any development that could result in a physical change to the environment. If the voters approve the HOME Proposition, the City Council’s subsequent adoption of the implementing HOME Overlay Zoning regulations, and its discretionary approval of any project activating a HOME overlay on a particular parcel, will each be reviewed under CEQA at that time.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting Resolution No. ___ Adding a Proposition to the Ballot Creating HOME (Housing Overlay – Mixed Environments) Overlays in the City’s Commercial and Industrial Areas for the November 3 General Municipal Election Pursuant to Elections Code § 9222 (Attachment 1 to the staff report);

2. Separately, adopting Resolution No. ___ adopting Land Use Policy Maps for the HOME Land Use Designation (Attachment 2 to the staff report);

3. Adopting Resolutions No. ___ (Attachment 3 to the staff report) and No. ___ (Attachment 4 to the staff report) requesting an impartial analysis, and establishing procedures for ballot arguments, respectively;

4. Determining whether the City Council should submit an argument in favor of the ballot proposition;

5. Directing staff to return with the implementing HOME Overlay Zoning regulations for the City Council’s consideration and adoption in the event the HOME Proposition is approved by the voters; and

6. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Community Development Director Hou presented a PowerPoint presentation elaborating on a proposed ballot measure amending the Land Use and Urban Design Element to create HOME overlays in the City’s commercial and industrial areas to expand housing opportunities. He detailed amendments to proposed Resolution No. 2026-R63 which include:
• An amendment to the title language of the Exhibit A:
“A measure amending the Monterey Park land use element to keep residential neighborhoods intact through maintaining voter approved

Page 46 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
land use restrictions and Monterey Park’s local control over the state for housing decisions, continue prohibiting data centers, provide housing for residents, prevent crime/homeless encampments, attract businesses, and improve the local economy by allowing limited residential uses in underutilized industrial, commercial/office areas, requiring public input, ensuring environmental protections, protecting public safety, parks/open space”
• The addition of language in Section 2 of Exhibit A to include:
“A certified copy of Resolution No. 2026-R64 may be reviewed at www.montereypark.ca.gov/MPKHOME”
The City Council ensued in a discussion regarding the city's current land use designation and future housing opportunities the proposed ballot measure will provide in the City.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, as amended, to add additional parcels to the proposed HOME overlay which include schools, religious institutions and buildings in association with the Southern California Gas Company.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong, motion failed due to a lack of a second motion.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026-R63 as amended, Resolution No. 2026- R64, Resolution No. 2026-R65 and Resolution No. 2026-R66, and designated Mayor Lo to write the argument in favor of the ballot measure.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Yang, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None
Resolution No. 2026-R63
A Resolution adding a proposition to the ballot creating HOME (housing overlay – mixed environments) overlays in the city’s commercial and industrial areas for the November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election pursuant to Elections Code § 9222

Page 47 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
Resolution No. 2026-R64
A Resolution adopting land use policy maps for the HOME (housing overlay - mixed environments) Land Use Designation, to be ratified by voters on November 3, 2026
Resolution No. 2026-R65
A Resolution directing the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the proposition creating HOME (housing overlay – mixed environments) overlays in the city's commercial and industrial areas
Resolution No. 2026-R66
A Resolution establishing requirements for ballot arguments filed with the City Clerk to be included with voter information for the General Municipal Election on November 3, 2026

Action Taken: City Council Member Wong declared a potential Conflict of Interest on Agenda Item No. 10.H. as his property is 500 feet of the proposed project location and did not participate in the item. The City Council approved Agenda Item Nos. 10.A., 10.B., 10.C., 10.D., 10.F., 10.G., 10.H. and 10.I., except for Agenda Item No. 10.E. reading resolutions and ordinances by the title only and waiving further reading thereof.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: Thomas Wong, for Agenda Item No. 10.H.

10.A. Minutes
The minutes are a record of the official actions taken at the City Council meeting.

Page 48 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the minutes from the regular meetings of May 6, 2026, May 20, 2026 and June 3, 2026, and the special meetings of May 27, 2026, June 2, 2026 and June 3, 2026 and;

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

10.B. Monthly Investment Report
As of June 30, 2026, invested funds for the City of Monterey Park total $81,517,474.88.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the monthly investment report; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council received and filed the monthly investment report, on Consent Calendar.

10.C. Ratification of Letters Due to Los Palos Fire Incident The Los Palos Incident was a fire that burned at a cold storage facility in Boyle Heights from June 17 through June 24. The facility, leased by Lineage, Inc. and owned by Chill Build Los Angeles I LLC, held an estimated 85 million pounds of food. Since firefighters extinguished the fire, abatement efforts have remained sparse, leaving the food to defrost and rot, causing foul odors in the immediate and surrounding areas, including Monterey Park. In response, the City of Monterey Park sent a letter to Lineage, formally demanding that it immediately address the public health nuisance.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Ratifying the City’s letters sent to Lineage, Inc. and Elected Officials, regarding an urgent request for immediate fire remediation and abatement, on behalf of City Council; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

Page 49 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026

10.D. 2026/2027 CTFGP Grant Award
The City of Monterey Park Police Department ("Police Department") was notified of an award of $381,449.96 from the CHP CTFGP for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The Police Department will utilize the grant funding to reduce and mitigate the impacts of impaired driving in our community.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Accepting and appropriating grant funds and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with the Department of California Highway Patrol ("CHP") in the amount of $381,449.96 for the Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program ("CTFGP");

2. Adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to receive and appropriate grant funds in Fiscal Year 2026-27, and execute an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with the CHP in the amount of $381,449.96 for the CTFGP; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation and approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026-R67, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2026-R67
A Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to receive and appropriate grant funds for the cannabis tax fund grant program

10.E. Accepting a monetary donation from the Friends of the Seniors Langley Senior Citizens Center for $29,510 on behalf of the City of Monterey Park
This Agenda Item was heard after Public Comments.

In August 2025, members of the Friends of the Seniors contacted the Recreation and Community Services Department to provide an update on the status of the organization and to begin discussions about potential funding opportunities. The Friends of the Seniors established a grant request process to allow the City to submit requests for monetary support.

In June 2026, the Recreation and Community Services Department submitted a request for support and the Board of Trustees approved an award of $29,510. The approved monetary donation of $29,510 will fund the purchase of equipment and supplies for Langley Center, including tables and chairs, exercise bikes, a photo booth, and arcade-style games. These enhancements will expand recreational opportunities, improve programming, and enhance the overall experience for participants at Langley Center. The

Page 50 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
Aging Commission also reviewed the department’s request and is in favor of supporting the award.

Pursuant to Resolution No. 11776, the City Council may accept donations with a value estimated at $25,000 or greater (Attachment 1 to the staff report). Therefore, it is requested that the City Council accept a monetary donation of $29,510 from Friends of the Seniors Langley Senior Citizens Center for the Langley Center facility and programs.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Accepting a monetary donation from Friends of the Seniors Langley Senior Citizens Center for $29,510 on behalf of the City of Monterey Park; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Recreation and Community Services Supervisor Chavez presented an oral staff report regarding the monetary donation of $29,510 from the Friends of the Seniors Langley Senior Citizens Center.

Public Speaker:
• John Gin, President of the Friends of the Seniors Langley Senior Citizens Center, shared words of appreciation to the City Council, explained the organization's role in supporting the seniors in Monterey Park and expressed his interest in activating the organization to collaborate with City staff and the Commission of Aging to improve the Langley Center. He provided a written correspondence to the City Clerk to be filed as part of the record.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Ngo and seconded by Council Member Sanchez, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Page 51 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026

10.F. Authorize The Purchase of a 2027 CNG Freightliner 114SD Sewer Vactor Truck and 2027 Caterpillar 420 Backhoe Loader
The Water and Street Maintenance Divisions rely heavily on a shared vacuum/jetter combo unit and backhoe loader for use in day-to-day operations, including water main break response, storm drain maintenance, and pavement repairs. Existing units are often unavailable because they are in use for other work or undergoing routine maintenance.

The Public Works Director (“Director”) recommends the purchase of a 2027 CNG Freightliner 114SD Vactor truck and Caterpillar 420 backhoe loader to ensure uninterrupted service and timely response to field needs. The Vactor equipment may be purchased from Haaker Equipment Company for the total cost of $595,043. The backhoe loader may be purchased through Quinn Company for a total cost of $177,853. Both pieces of equipment were identified through Sourcewell contracts, with applicable taxes and fees included in the total cost of each.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Waiving bidding requirements pursuant to Monterey Park Municipal Code Section 3.20.050(4) (cooperative purchasing), and authorizing the City Manager to purchase a 2027 CNG Freightliner 114SD sewer vactor truck from Haaker Equipment Company for $595,043 and a Caterpillar 420 backhoe loader from Quinn Company for $177,853;

2. Approving an appropriation of $640,043 to the FY2026-27 budget from the Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Fund (411) for the purchase of 2027 CNG Freightliner 114SD sewer vactor truck from Haaker Equipment Company; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

10.G.Library Elevator Modernization – Award of Contract Per Resolution No. 2026-R43, the Public Works Director (“Director”) solicited bids for the Library Elevator Modernization Project, Capital Improvement Project No. 95038 (the “Project”). The Project’s public bid opening was on July 7, 2026, and two bids were received: Maverick Elevator Service CA LLC and AZTech Elevator Company.

Page 52 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
The Director recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a public works contract with Maverick Elevator Service CA LLC (“Maverick”), the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, for the Library Elevator Modernization Project in the amount of $175,173.00 plus $17,517 contingency.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The proposed project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations § 15301 as a Class 1 categorical exemption (Existing Facilities).

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a public works contract, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with Maverick Elevator Service CA LLC, in the amount of $175,173.00 for the Library Elevator Modernization, Specification No. 2026-004;

2. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve change orders in an amount not to exceed $17,517 (10%) over the total contract amount; and

3. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

10.H. Amendment to Agreement No. 2520-A, with SA Associates concerning the Garvey Sewer Improvements Project Construction Inspection Services
Capital Improvement Project (“CIP”) No. 99027 – Sewer Repairs at Various Locations Project covers repairs of sewer locations citywide. The proposed project is for the installation of an 18” sewer relief line on Garvey Avenue from Chandler Avenue to Ynez Avenue. The project was awarded to GRBCON, Inc. on July 16, 2025. The project encountered various unforeseen conditions that resulted in delays in the completion of the project. The Public Works Director (“Director”) recommends executing an agreement amendment in a form approved by the City Attorney, with SA Associates, for a not to exceed amount of $140,000 for construction inspection services.

Page 53 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The proposed action approves an amendment to an existing professional services agreement for additional construction inspection services for the Garvey Sewer Improvements Project. The amendment does not modify the scope of the underlying project or authorize additional physical improvements. The underlying project is categorically exempt from CEQA under the Class 1 exemption for Existing Facilities. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15301.) Because the amendment is limited to additional professional services for the exempt project and does not change the scope or environmental effects of the approved work, no additional CEQA review is required.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute an Amendment to Agreement No. 2520-A a form approved by the City Attorney, with SA Associates, to provide additional construction inspection services for an additional amount of $60,000, increasing the total contract amount to an amount not to exceed $140,000;

2. Taking such additional, related action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: Council Member Wong declared a potential Conflict of Interest as his property is 500 feet of the proposed project site, recused himself and did not participate in the item. The City Council approved the recommendation, on Consent Calendar.

10.I. National Back-to-School Month Resolution (As Requested by Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez)
The attached resolution (to the staff report) is being brought forth to the Council for consideration at the request of Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the attached resolution; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026- R68, on Consent Calendar.

Resolution No. 2026-R68
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Monterey Park, California, declaring and recognizing the month of August 2026 as National Back-toSchool Month

Page 54 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026

11. Public Hearing

11.A. A public hearing to consider an ordinance approving Amended Development Agreement No. 2261-AA (DA-26-01) and a resolution approving Tentative Map No. 26-05 (County Map No. 82800) for a mixeduse development consisting of 169 residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail space located at 114 E. Garvey Avenue
Rykadan 005, LLC (the “Applicant”) requests approval of Amended Development Agreement (“DA”) No. 2261-AA, to amend the Development Agreement approved by the City Council in 2021 and approval of a Tentative Map. The proposed Amended Development Agreement (DA-26-01) would facilitate the construction of a seven-story, mixed-use development consisting of 169 rental residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail tenant space. The Project is located at the southeast corner of E. Garvey Avenue and S. Garfield Avenue and includes five addresses (114 E. Garvey Avenue and 100, 120, 150, and 200 S. Garfield Avenue) and six Assessor Parcel Numbers (5257-015-001, 002, 003, 004, 005, and 035), collectively referred to as 114 E. Garvey Avenue (the “Project Site”).

Compared to the 2021 approval, the Amended Development Agreement increases the residential uses, decreases the area dedicated to commercial uses; modifies parking and open space; and includes additional public benefits, including separate $200,000 contributions to the City's Affordable Housing Fund and Parks Master Plan Facilities Fund.

TYPE OF ACTION (LEGISLATIVE AND QUASI-JUDICIAL)
Legislative: The recommended action includes an Ordinance to approve Amended Development Agreement No. 2261-AA in which the City Council acts in its discretionary legislative capacity. Pursuant to Government Code § 65867.5, to approve the Amended Development Agreement, the City Council must find that the:
• Provisions of the Agreement are consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan; and
• Agreement provides that any tentative map prepared for the subdivision will comply with Government Code § 66473.7.

Quasi-Judicial: The recommended action includes a resolution approving a Tentative Map. In considering such actions, the City Council acts in a quasijudicial role. In that capacity, the City Council applies the applicable law to the facts contained in the administrative record. Accordingly, the City Council can only consider facts that are relevant to the case. A party appearing before the legislative body is entitled to:
• Notice of the proposed action;
• Reasons for the action;

Page 55 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
• A copy of the evidence on which the action is based; and • The right to respond before a reasonably impartial, non-involved reviewer.

The City Council must base its decision on substantial evidence within the record. “Substantial evidence” includes facts, reasonable assumptions supported by facts, and expert opinion supported by facts. Argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence which is clearly erroneous or inaccurate, or evidence of social or economic impacts does not constitute substantial evidence. If the City Council relies on information outside the record or on matters that do not constitute substantial evidence, a court may invalidate the Council’s decision.

To approve the Tentative Map, the City Council must find that the Project meets the findings required by Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) §

20.04.070 that:

A. The Project is consistent with the Monterey Park General Plan; B. The Project is consistent with the applicable planned development; C. The Project is consistent with the provisions of the MPMC; D. The Project is in the interest of public health and safety; and E. The Project is a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area.

These findings are included in the attached Resolution (Attachment 2 to the staff report); the facts upon which these findings rely are also included within the administrative record. The facts to make such findings are based upon substantial evidence presented during the City Council public hearing on August 5, 2026.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The request includes the construction of a seven-story, mixed-use development consisting of 169 rental residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail tenant space (the “Project”). Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal.

Code of Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”), the City has reviewed the Project and determined that the Project is exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code § 21080.66 and that the Project satisfies the requirements of that section. If approved, the City will file a Notice of Exemption (Attachment 3 to the staff report) as required under Public Resources Code §§ 21008, 21152 for the Project. Accordingly, no environmental impact report, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration is required for the Project.

Page 56 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
Public Resources Code § 21080.66, enacted by Assembly Bill (“AB”) 130, exempts qualifying housing development projects from CEQA if they satisfy specified criteria. Because the Project qualifies for this statutory exemption, technical studies otherwise associated with CEQA review, such as air quality and noise analyses, were not required. A traffic study was nevertheless prepared for the Project and is discussed later in this report.

To qualify for the streamlining exemption under Public Resources Code § 21080.66, a project must satisfy statutory requirements. The Applicant submitted an AB 130 Eligibility Checklist (Attachment 4 to the staff report), and staff determined that the Project satisfies those eligibility requirements, including project size, urbanized location, infill status, absence of statutory exclusion areas, and the lack of any historic structure demolition.

AB 130 also requires consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the Project Site. City staff conducted tribal consultation in accordance with the statute and incorporated tribal cultural resource conditions into the Project’s Conditions of Approval at the request of one of the consulted tribes (Conditions of Approval 28-33).

Finally, AB 130 requires a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”).

The Applicant submitted a Phase I ESA for the Project (Attachment 5) which staff reviewed and accepted. Consistent with California law, any recognized environmental conditions identified in the Phase I ESA must be remediated or otherwise addressed before issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing;

2. Receiving documentary and testimonial evidence;

3. Closing the public hearing;

4. After considering the evidence received during the public hearing:
introducing and waiving the first reading of an ordinance approving Amended Development Agreement No. 2261-AA (DA-26-01); and adopting a resolution approving Tentative Map (TM) No. 26-05 (County Map No. 82800); and

5. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Public Speakers:
• Kahn Scolnick expressed his opinions regarding mixed-use developments and their alleged lack of affordability.

Page 57 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
• Mistress Jessica shared viewpoints regarding the need to support lowincome residents and commented on civic engagement participation. • Deb Simone inquired about the possibility of including Waymos and scooters to attract younger patrons and provide better success in retail development.

Discussion: Senior Planner Muñoz presented a PowerPoint presentation to consider approving an amendment to Development Agreement No. 2261-A and approving a tentative map for a mixed-use development consisting of 169 market-rate residential rental units with approximately 16,300 feet of commercial retail space.

Project Consultants Teresa Wan, George Rhyner, Carla Sanchez, Ana Zarate and Henry Tong, virtually present, were available for questions.

Counsel Richard McDonald, Architect Chris Bysdedt, and Project Consultants Jared Wright, Christopher Bornand and Vincent Tseng, were available for questions.

Action Taken: Council Member Yang declared a potential Conflict of Interest as her property is 1,000 feet from the proposed project site, recused herself and did not participate in the item. The City Council opened the Public Hearing at 9:26 p.m., received documentary and testimonial evidence, closed the Public Hearing at 10:31 p.m., introduced and waived the first reading of an Ordinance and approved and adopted Resolution No. 2026-R69.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Ngo and seconded by Council Member Wong, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: Elizabeth Yang
Ordinance, 1st reading
An Ordinance approving amended Development Agreement No. 2261-AA (DA-26-01) by and between the City of Monterey Park and Rykadan 005, LLC, for a proposed seven-story mixed-use development consisting of 169 residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail space generally located at 114 E. Garvey Avenue

Page 58 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 5, 2026
Resolution No. 2026-R69
A Resolution approving Tentative Map No. 82800 (TM-26-05) to merge six parcels into one, as conditioned, for a proposed seven-story mixed-use development consisting of 169 residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail space generally located at 114 E. Garvey Avenue

12. New Business
None.

13. City Communications (City Council) / Future Agenda Items Council Member Yang reported her attendance at National Night Out and the Asian American and Pacific Islander, Learn. Engage. Advocate. Dream. (AAPI L.E.A.D) Conference in Los Angeles.

Council Member Ngo noted his attendance at the Alhambra Unified School District meeting to discuss opportunities to receive additional funds towards the restoration of the Barnes Park Aquatic Center, the Long Beach Dragon Boat Festival and the Meet the Mayor event.

Council Member Wong spoke about his participation at the AAPI L.E.A.D.

Conference and the California Leadership Summit in Sacramento. He requested that a future agenda item be added to explore ways to improve construction timelines on projects to minimize impact on residents and businesses.

Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez reiterated Council Member Wong's future agenda item and reported on his attendance at Movie Night at the Park and the Gladys Knight and Smokey Robinson show at the Hollywood Bowl.

Mayor Lo thanked the residents who attended his first Meet-up with the Mayor event.

14. Closed Session (if Required; City Attorney to Announce) None.

15. Adjournment
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m.
_____________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk
Approved on MM DD YYYY, at the regular City Council meeting

Page 59 of 208 ends

xx-xx
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Minutes
Monterey Park City Council
Public Safety Community Meeting
August 11, 2026
The City Council of the City of Monterey Park held a Public Safety Community Meeting of the Council at the Monterey Highlands Elementary School Cafeteria located at 400 Casuda Canyon Drive, Monterey Park, CA, 91754 on Tuesday, August 11, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.

1. Call to Order
Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m.

Roll Call
Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None
Also Present:

City Manager Inez Alvarez
Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia
Director of Finance Martha Garcia
Director of Community Development Timothy Hou
Director of Public Works Shawn Igoe
Police Chief Scott Wiese
Fire Chief Jason Hing
Fire Battalion Chief Jonathan Gin
Police Detective Tyler DeGuzman
Finance Manager Laura Borjon
IT Manager Martin Dinh
Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang
Assistant Deputy City Clerk Helena Cho
Virtually Present: None.

2. Public Safety Community Meeting
I. Welcome
II. Monterey Park Police Department Presentation
Police Chief Wiese alongside Detective DeGuzman gave a PowerPoint presentation on Automated License Plate Recognition cameras and their use in the Monterey Park Police Department.

Page 60 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 11, 2026
III. Community Members Comments and Questions
IV. Adjournment
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 7:34 p.m.
_________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk
Approved on MM DD, YYYY at the regular City Council Meeting

Page 61 of 208 ends

xx-xx
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Minutes
Monterey Park City Council
Financing Authority (MPFA)
Housing Authority (MPHA)
Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD)
Successor Agency (SA)
Special Meeting
August 19, 2026
The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Special Meeting of the Council in Room 266, Second Floor of City Hall, located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Wednesday, August 19, 2026, at 5:30 p.m.

1. Call to Order
Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m.

2. Roll Call
City Manager Mayor Lo called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None.

Also Present:

City Manager Inez Alvarez
City Attorney Karl Berger
Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia
Director of Public Works Shawn Igoe
Director of Finance Martha Garcia
Police Chief Scott Wiese
Police Lieutenant Brenda Iglesias
Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang
Virtually Present:

Assistant City Attorney Tim Campen

3. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested
None

4. Public Comments
None.

Page 62 of 208 ends

xx-xx

5. Closed Session
Upon conclusion of Closed Session, the Mayor and/or City Attorney will announce any reportable actions in accordance with the Brown Act.

The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 5:35 p.m.

5.A. Conference with Legal Counsel, Initiation of Litigation (Government Code § 54956.9(d)(4)). Number of Potential Cases: One.

5.B. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation, Government Code § 54956.9(d)(1)
Sujeyla Lopez v. Monterey Park, et al., LASC case no.
26NNCV03416 (filed April 30, 2026)

6. Adjournment
The City Council reconvened from Closed Session at 6:01 p.m. with all Council Members present.

There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 6:01 p.m.
_____________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk
Approved on MM DD, YYYY at the regular City Council Meeting

Page 63 of 208 ends

xx-xx
Mission Statement
The mission of the City of Monterey Park is to provide excellent service, foster growth and opportunity, and create a joyous and collaborative environment.

Minutes
Monterey Park City Council
Financing Authority (MPFA)
Housing Authority (MPHA)
Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD)
Successor Agency (SA)
Regular Meeting
August 19, 2026
The City Council, the Financing Authority (MPFA), the Housing Authority (MPHA), the Geologic Hazard Abatement District (GHAD), and the Successor Agency (SA) of the City of Monterey Park held a Regular Meeting of the Council in the Council Chamber, located at 320 West Newmark Avenue in the City of Monterey Park, Wednesday, August 19, 2026, at 6:30 p.m.

1. Call to Order
Mayor Lo called the meeting to order at 6:38 p.m.

2. Flag Salute
The Monterey Park Police Explorers led the flag salute.

3. Roll Call
City Clerk Maychelle Yee called the roll:

Council Members Present: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Council Members Absent: None.

Also Present:

City Manager Inez Alvarez
City Attorney Karl Berger
Assistant City Manager Diana Garcia
Director of Finance Martha Garcia
Director of Community Development Timothy Hou
Director of Recreation and Community Service Robert Aguirre City Librarian Kristin Olivarez
Director of Public Works Shawn Igoe
Police Chief Scott Wiese
Fire Chief Jason Hing
Economic Development Manager Joseph Torres
Planning Manager Jerry Guevara
Engineering Manager/Transtech Consultant Ziad Mazboudi
Public Works Manager Xochitl Tipan
Risk Management Manager Julie DeZiel

Page 64 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Principal Management Analyst Rebecca Bojorquez
Principal Human Resources Analyst Denise Gonzalez
Deputy City Clerk Cindy Trang
Office Assistant Michelle Martinez
Administrative Intern Michael Guida
Virtually Present:

None.

4. Telecommunications Announcement, if requested
None.

5. Agenda Revisions and Additions
Deputy City Clerk Trang noted a typographical error in the numbering sequence of Agenda Item No. 10.C. in the published Agenda Packet.

6. Presentation

6.A. Monterey Park Sports Club "Heat" 14U Softball - District Champion, State Finalists and Nationals Champion
Team Manager Johnson provided words of appreciation to the players and presented a plaque to the City Council. The City Council disseminated certificates to the players and coaches for their achievement.

6.B. Monterey Park PONY Baseball - Shetland All-Star PONY World Series Participants
Coach Mercado expressed his gratitude to the team and their hard-earned effort as participants in the Shetland All-Star Pony World Series. The City Council shared certificates of appreciation with the coaches and players.

7. Public Comments
• Raymond Yu inquired about constructing Panera Bread in the Monterey Park Marketplace.
• Joe Martin, representing Via Transportation, requested Agenda Item No.

10.B. be pulled for discussion and to issue a "best-and-final" procurement process be issued to all responsive proposers stating his belief that Via Transportation has the capability to produce services for Monterey Park. • Susan T expressed her support for the usage of Automated License Plate Recognition cameras (ALPR) and suggested the City Council find a compromise regarding the residents’ concerns with the company Flock Safety.

Page 65 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
• Robert Ogawa-Monroe recognized the members of the organization, San Gabriel Valley Power Up Beacon (SGV PUB) and noted that their efforts in the plan development process for the Barnes Park Aquatic Center project had gone unacknowledged.
• Dave Jones thanked the City for hosting the special community meeting regarding ALPR cameras and expressed his opposition to the Monterey Park Police Department (MPPD) utilizing the cameras.
• Edlyn Takahashi, representing SGV PUB, thanked the City for moving forward with the development of the Barnes Park Aquatic Center. She shared her concerns about the lack of consultation with aquatic coaches during the design process and requested that the design reflects standards for safe competitive diving.
• Gregory Verbeck, retired Monterey Park Police Sergeant, encouraged the use of ALPR cameras, described the challenges of conducting investigations without advanced technology and expressed the need for strong policies governing their use.
• Troy Grant, Police Corporal and President of the Monterey Park Police Officers Association, spoke about the difficulty of apprehending suspects without the assistance of ALPR cameras and emphasized the need of proper tools to keep the City safe.
• Rob Daltorio shared his experience working with the MPPD in the 1980s without the use of proper technology to apprehend suspects. • Officer Becerca of the MPPD, recalled an instance of successfully apprehending criminal suspects with the assistance of ALPR cameras. • Sara Mena commented on her time living in Monterey Park and showed her support for the usage of the ALPR cameras.
• Lwin Kyo relayed her concerns about illegal boarding houses in Monterey Park and requested to speak with MPPD regarding the matter. • Mistress Flock shared an opinion on the recent special community meeting about the usage of ALPR cameras and provided suggestions for future community meetings.

8. Staff Communications
None.

Page 66 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026

9. Old Business

9.A. January 21, 2023 Memorial Project Update
On January 21, 2023, the City of Monterey Park experienced a mass shooting at Star Ballroom Dance Studio that resulted in the loss of 11 lives and impacted countless families, survivors, and community members.

In January 2026, the City Council approved the conceptual design for a permanent memorial honoring those who lost their lives and providing a place for reflection, remembrance, and healing.

Following Council's approval of the concept, staff worked with the project team and community partners to finalize the memorial's design and construction plans. The design has now been substantially completed, including the selection of materials, plantings, site features, and memorial verbiage.

The final design details are presented to the City Council as part of this update. Memorial verbiage and other design elements were developed with input from families and survivors and are incorporated into the final plans.

During the design process, staff also identified the need for additional concrete work along the existing walkway to improve accessibility and ensure an accessible route to and through the memorial. This work has been incorporated into the project plans and will be included in the construction scope.

With the design plans nearing completion, the City will proceed with issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for construction of the memorial. Following the solicitation and evaluation process, staff will return to the City Council with a recommendation to award the construction contract.

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file this update and presentation regarding the final design of the January 21, 2023 Memorial.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing this update regarding the January 21, 2023 Memorial Project; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Page 67 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Discussion: Assistant City Manager Garcia alongside Engineering Manager/ Transtech Consultant Mazboudi presented a PowerPoint presentation with an update on the final design of the January 21, 2023, Memorial. She elaborated on the steps taken to develop the final design with feedback provided by the City Council from previous meetings.

Andrea Tseng of the Chinatown Service Center, virtually present, was available for questions.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendation.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Ngo, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

9.B. Award of Professional Services Agreement to HGW Architecture for the preparation of Plans, Specifications, and Estimates for the Barnes Park Aquatic Center, CIP No. 95067
The Public Works Director (“Director”) issued a Request For Proposals (“RFP”) on April 27, 2026 for the preparation of PS&E for the Project. The City received seven proposals on May 26, 2026. The City team interviewed the top four consultants on June 11, 2026. Following the interviews, staff requested that all four consultants interviewed provide a modified fee proposal excluding construction support.

The Director recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with HGW Architecture for the preparation of PS&E for the Project in an amount not-to-exceed $1,656,892 plus a contingency of $83,108 for a total agreement amount not to exceed $1,740,000. The Director also requests $312,400 from the General Fund for FY 2026-27 to fund the proposed agreement.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

The proposed action—award of a professional services agreement for architectural and engineering design of the Aquatic Center—is exempt from CEQA (Pub. Resources Code, § 21065 et seq.) and the guidelines promulgated thereunder (“CEQA Guidelines” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3). Awarding a design contract is an administrative action and is the award of a professional services agreement for architectural and engineering design of the Barnes Park

Page 68 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Aquatic Center. The proposed action is not subject to CEQA because it does not approve the project, authorize construction, or commit the City to a definite course of action regarding the project. (CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15352, 15004.).

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with HGW Architecture for the preparation of Plans, Specifications & Engineer’s estimates (PS&E) for the Barnes Park Aquatic Center Project (Project), in an amount not to exceed $1,656,892;

2. Authorizing the Public Works Director to approve change orders not to exceed $83,108 (5%) over the total contract amount for a total agreement amount not to exceed $1,740,000;

3. Authorizing the appropriation of $312,400 to the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget from the General Fund; and

4. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Shawn Igoe gave a PowerPoint presentation elaborating on the Request for Proposal process for the Barnes Park Aquatic Center project and announced the awarded firm, HGW Architecture.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Ngo, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

Page 69 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Action Taken: Council Member Yang declared a potential Conflict of Interest as her property is within 1,000 feet of the project’s location, recused herself and did not participate on Agenda Item No. 10.C. The City Council approved Agenda Item Nos. 10.A as amended., 10.C., 10.D. and 10.E. , except for Agenda Item No. 10.B. which was pulled for discussion, separate motion, reading resolutions and ordinances by the title only and waiving further reading thereof.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Ngo, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: Elizabeth Yang, for 10.C.

10.A. Minutes
The minutes are a record of the official actions taken at the City Council meeting.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving the minutes from the regular meeting of June 17, 2026 and the special meetings of June 9, 2026, June 23, 2026 5:45 p.m., June 23, 2026 6:00 p.m., June 24, 2026, and June 30, 2026; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations as amended, to revise the language in the June 9, 2026, regular meeting minutes to reflect “Mayor Yang called the meeting to order”, on Consent Calendar.

10.B. Award of Contract to First Transit, Inc. for Fixed-Route, Microtransit, and Dial-a-Ride Transportation Services
On May 7, 2026, the Public Works Director (“Director”) released a request for proposals (“RFP”) for fixed-route, microtransit, and dial-a-ride transportation services. Proposals were due on June 18, 2026 and four proposals were received.

Page 70 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
The Director recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a transit agreement for fixed-route, microtransit, and dial-a-ride transportation services with First Transit, Inc, (“First Transit”) for transportation services in the not-to-exceed amount of $12,534,987 for a fouryear term with the option to extend for two (2) additional one-year increments at the City’s sole discretion.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement with First Transit, Inc., in a form approved by the City Attorney, for fixed-route, microtransit, and dial-a-ride transportation services for an initial fouryear term in the not-to-exceed amount of $12,534,987, with options to extend the agreement for up to two additional one-year terms at the City’s sole discretion; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Discussion: Public Works Manager Tipan presented a PowerPoint presentation detailing the RFP process for a fixed route on demand and diala-ride service for the residents. Steve Wilkes from Flex Links, who was virtually present, was available for questions.

The City Council ensued in a discussion regarding potential options for consideration for fixed-route transits and the opportunity to introduce electronic vehicles as service options for residents.

Public Speakers:
• David Smith, Director of Business Development for First Transit, commented on the company's potential opportunity to work with the City.
• Joe Martin, representing Via Transportation, presented clarification points regarding Via Transportation's request to have the City submit a "best and final" procurement offer.

Action Taken: The City Council rejected all bids for Fixed-Route, Microtransit, and Dial-a-Ride Transportation Services, directed staff to bring back options for City Council's consideration, and authorized the extension of the current contract to a "month-to-month" basis.

Page 71 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Yang, motion carried by the following vote. The vote was cast in error:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: Thomas Wong
Recusal: Council Members: None
Action Taken: Due to a vote cast in error, the City Council cast a new vote. The City Council rejected all bids for Fixed-Route, Microtransit, and Dial-a-Ride Transportation Services, directed staff to bring back options for City Council's consideration and authorized the extension of the current contract to a "month-to-month" basis.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Council Member Yang, motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None

10.C.Second Reading of Ordinance Approving Amendment to Development Agreement No. 2261-AA for the Celadon Mixed-Use Development Project at 114 E. Garvey Avenue
Rykadan 005, LLC (the “Applicant”) requests approval of Amended Development Agreement (“DA”) No. 2261-AA, to amend the Development Agreement approved by the City Council in 2021 and approval of a Tentative Map. The proposed Amended Development Agreement (DA-26-01) would facilitate the construction of a seven-story, mixed-use development consisting of 169 rental residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail tenant space. The Project is located at the southeast corner of E. Garvey Avenue and S. Garfield Avenue and includes five addresses (114 E. Garvey Avenue and 100, 120, 150, and 200 S. Garfield Avenue) and six Assessor Parcel Numbers (5257-015-001, 002, 003, 004, 005, and 035), collectively referred to as 114 E. Garvey Avenue (the “Project Site”).

Page 72 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026

To approve the Tentative Map, the City Council must find that the Project meets the findings required by Monterey Park Municipal Code (“MPMC”) §

20.04.070 that:

Page 73 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
E. The Project is a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surrounding area.

These findings are included in the attached Resolution (Attachment 2 to the staff report on August 5, 2026); the facts upon which these findings rely are also included within the administrative record. The facts to make such findings are based upon substantial evidence presented during the City Council public hearing on August 5, 2026.

At its August 5, 2026, regular meeting, the City Council introduced the subject ordinance for first reading and unanimously recommended for second reading. It is recommended that the City Council hold the second reading and adopt the subject ordinance at this time. The staff report of the August 5, 2026, City Council meeting is attached here to as Attachment 2 (to the staff report) for reference. If adopted, the ordinance will take effect in 30 days.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code sections 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. sections 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”), the ordinance’s second reading is exempt from CEQA under Public Resources Code Section 21080.66 and by the Notice of Exemption adopted by the City Council on August 5, 2026, for the Celadon Mixed-Use Development Project and filed on August 6, 2026, with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Waiving second reading and adopting an uncodified ordinance approving Amended Development Agreement No. 2261-AA (DA-26- 01) by and between the City of Monterey Park and Rykadan 005, LLC, for a proposed seven-story mixed-development consisting of 169 residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail space generally located at 114 E. Garvey Avenue; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: Deputy City Clerk Trang reported a typographical error in the numbering sequence of Agenda Item No. 10.C. in the published Agenda Packet. Council Member Yang declared a potential Conflict of Interest as her property is within 1,000 feet of the proposed project, recused herself and did not participate on the item. The City Council waived the second reading and approved and adopted Ordinance No. 2281, on Consent Calendar.

Page 74 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Ordinance No. 2281
An Ordinance approving amended Development Agreement No. 2261-AA (DA-26-01) by and between the City of Monterey Park and Rykadan 005, LLC, for a proposed seven-story mixed-use development consisting of 169 residential units and approximately 16,300 square feet of commercial/retail space generally located at 114 E., Garvey Avenue

10.D.Voter Education for City Ballot Measures – November 2026 General Municipal Election
The November 2026 General Municipal Election will include two City ballot measures for voter consideration. California law permits public agencies to use public resources to provide impartial and factual information regarding ballot measures, while prohibiting the use of public funds for campaign advocacy.

To ensure residents have access to accurate, objective information before casting their ballots, the City has historically conducted public education efforts that explain the purpose, content, and potential effects of ballot measures without advocating for or against their adoption.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Directing staff to take all necessary and appropriate actions to conduct impartial public education regarding the City ballot measures appearing on the November 2026 General Municipal Election ballot; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

10.E. City Council Support for State Nomination of Three Monterey Park Census Tracts for Opportunity Zone Designation
The federal Opportunity Zone Program is an economic development incentive that encourages private investment in eligible lower-income communities.

Federal legislation enacted in 2025 made the Opportunity Zone Program permanent and established recurring rounds of census tract designations.

The first new round, commonly referred to as Opportunity Zones 2.0, is currently underway. The State’s recommendation is an important step toward a possible federal designation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and offers Monterey Park an opportunity to strengthen its position for future private investment.

Page 75 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
The State is accepting public comments on its recommended census tracts through August 28, 2026. The Letter of Support from City Council would formally endorse the State’s recommendation, demonstrate strong local governmental support, and provide the State with an additional record of the City’s commitment to the proposed designations.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

These actions are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code 2100, et seq., “CEQA”) and CEQA regulations (14 California Code of Regulations 15000, et seq.) because they consist of expressing support for the State’s recommendation of three census tracts for possible federal Opportunity Zone designation and do not approve any specific development project or physical change to the environment. Accordingly, the related actions do not constitute a “project” that requires environmental review.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the Mayor to sign the Letter of Support on behalf of the City Council to endorse the State of California’s recommendation to designate three Monterey Park census tracts under the Federal Opportunity Zone 2.0 Program (Attachment 1 to the staff report);

2. Directing staff to submit the signed letter to the State during the public comment period, which ends on August 28, 2026; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Action Taken: The City Council approved the recommendations, on Consent Calendar.

11. Public Hearing

11.A. Rescinding and Terminating Development Agreement No. 21-01 and Repealing Goodviews Specific Plan for the Property located at 1688 West Garvey Avenue
On May 6, 2026, the City Council held an annual review of Development Agreement No. 21-01 (Agreement No. 2252-AA (“Development Agreement”)) between the City of Monterey Park (“City”) and Center Int’l Investments, Inc. (“CII”) for the property located at 1688 West Garvey Avenue (APN: 5254-002- 903 (“Property”)) and found that CII failed to demonstrate good-faith compliance with the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement.

The City Council directed staff to initiate proceedings to rescind and terminate the Development Agreement in accordance with Government Code Section 65868 and Section 12 of the Development Agreement. In addition, the City Council directed staff to initiate proceedings to repeal the Goodviews Specific

Page 76 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Plan associated with the Development Agreement and project (“Project”), including any necessary zone change to restore the prior zoning designation.

Accordingly, staff recommends that the City Council introduce for first reading: (1) an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2210 and restoring the zoning designation of the Property from the Goodviews Specific Plan to HighDensity Residential (R-3); and (2) an uncodified ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2211 and rescinding and terminating the Development Agreement between the City and CII. This would allow the City to market the Property for sale in a manner that maximizes the potential return to offset the substantial abatement costs it has incurred.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code sections 21000, et seq. “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code of Regs. sections 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”), the proposed actions are exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). It can be determined with certainty that the proposed actions would have no significant effect on the environment, as they involve the repeal of the 1688 West Garvey Avenue Specific Plan (Goodviews Specific Plan), restoration of the property’s prior High-Density Residential (R-3) zoning designation, and rescission and termination of Development Agreement No. 21-01 and do not propose or approve any new development. If the proposed actions are approved, the City will file a Notice of Exemption as required under Public Resources Code sections 21008 and 21152.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Opening the public hearing;

2. Receiving documentary and testimonial evidence;

3. Closing the public hearing;

4. After considering the evidence received during the public hearing, introducing and waiving first reading for: (1) an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2210 and restoring the zoning designation of the property located at 1688 West Garvey Avenue from the 1688 West Garvey Avenue Specific Plan to High-Density Residential (R-3); and (2) an uncodified ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2211 and rescinding and terminating Development Agreement No. 21-01 (Agreement No. 2252-AA) between the City of Monterey Park and Center Int’l Investments, Inc.; and

5. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Page 77 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Public Speakers:
• David Alameda spoke about his experience living in Monterey Park, his time as a City Council Member and involvement in the City. He stated that the soil in that area was detrimental to the overall best interest of the land, believed the City should conduct further research regarding the structure, and suggested the construction of a trail or a dog park instead.
• Dave Jones articulated his opinion on the alleged stabilization issues on the land since the 1980s and claimed that rezoning the property would lead to failure.
• Mistress Flock commented on the opportunity to construct more affordable housing and advocated for the need of more resources to support the homeless population.
• James Bradshawe, representing Save our Slopes, spoke in opposition to the City's determination that the proposed rezoning was exempt from CEQA review, and argued that the rezoning was subject to environmental review as it could allegedly lead to new construction. He provided a written correspondence to the City Clerk to be filed as part of the record.
• Ramen N. expressed his opinion on the two proposed ordinances and the current state of the land on Garvey Ave. He provided a written correspondence to the City Clerk to be filed as part of the record. • Cindy Yee provided context to an email she sent to the City Council, elaborated on the potential danger of a slope failure and suggested the construction of a dog park as an alternative.
• The City Clerk’s Office received and filed two written communications from Cindy Yee and Jamie Hall regarding the proposed property on Garvey Avenue.
• The City Attorney’s Office submitted a series of response letters to Jamie Hall that were received and filed with the City Clerk’s Office.

Discussion: Planning Manager Guevara presented a PowerPoint presentation on the two proposed ordinances, as a continuation effort to rescind and terminate the specific plan and development agreement associated with the property located at 1688 West Garvey Avenue.

Page 78 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
The City Council ensued in a discussion about the two proposed ordinances and the potential impacts they might bring for future development for the City.

Action Taken: The City Council opened the Public Hearing at 8:53 p.m., received documentary and testimonial evidence, closed the Public Hearing at 9:19 p.m. and introduced and waived the first reading of an ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2210 and restoring the zoning designation of the property located at 1688 West Garvey Avenue from the 1688 West Garvey Avenue Specific Plan to High-Density Residential (R-3) and an uncodified ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2211 and rescinding and terminating Development Agreement No. 21-01 (Agreement No. 2252-AA) between the City of Monterey Park and Center Int’l Investments, Inc.

Motion: Moved by Council Member Wong and seconded by Mayor Lo , motion carried by the following vote:

Ayes: Council Members: Henry Lo, Vinh Ngo, Jose Sanchez, Thomas Wong, Elizabeth Yang
Noes: Council Members: None

Absent: Council Members: None
Abstain: Council Members: None
Recusal: Council Members: None
Ordinance, 1st reading
An Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2210 and restoring the zoning designation of the property located at 1688 West Garvey Avenue (APN:
5254-002-903) from the 1688 West Garvey Avenue specific plan to highdensity residential (R-3) Ordinance, 1st reading
An uncodified Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 2211 and rescinding and terminating Development Agreement No. 21-01 (Agreement No. 2252-AA) between the City of Monterey Park and Center Int’l Investments, Inc.

12. New Business
None.

13. City Communications (City Council) / Future Agenda Items Council Member Yang reported her participation alongside City Commissioner Victoria Chavez Calderon in recognizing outstanding citizens of Monterey Park.

Page 79 of 208 ends

xx-xx
August 19, 2026
Council Member Ngo commented on his attendance at the Changing of the Command Ceremony for Los Angeles County (LA County), the retirement of Lieutenant Colonel Fritzler, and the installment of Lieutenant de Jesus as United States Army Los Angeles Recruiting Battalion. He announced his participation at the ribbon-cutting ceremony for Nai Snow, the National Night Out event for the City of Rosemead and the Monterey Park Dodger Night.

Mayor Pro Tem Sanchez talked about the start of the new academic year and the past summer programs hosted by the Library. He shared his appreciation for the Police Department for hosting the special community meeting at Monterey Highlands Elementary School and to the residents who attended the Monterey Park Dodger Night. He highlighted the Farmers Market and encouraged residents to attend.

Mayor Lo expressed his appreciation to the community for engaging with the City Council regarding the quality of life in Monterey Park.

14. Closed Session (if Required; City Attorney to Announce) None.

15. Adjournment
There being no further business for consideration, the meeting was adjourned at 10:01 p.m.
_____________________
Maychelle Yee
City Clerk
Approved on MM DD YYYY, at the regular City Council meeting

Page 80 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.B.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Amy Lee, City Treasurer
Subject: Monthly Investment Report
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Receiving and filing the monthly investment report; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

As of August 31, 2026, invested funds for the City of Monterey Park total $82,047,126.31.

Background:

In accordance with the City’s Investment Policy, a monthly investment report is presented to the City Council showing the types of investments, dates and maturities, amounts of deposits, rates of interest, and the current market values for securities with maturity more than 12 months. The attached monthly investment report includes a portfolio summary from Chandler Asset Management.

Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A
Fiscal Impact:

N/A
Attachments:

1. Monthly Investment Report

Page 81 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
Monthly Investment Report

Page 82 of 208 ends

INVESTMENTS PORTFOLIO PROFILE:

TOTAL BALANCE AT 8/31/2026 82,047,126.31 $

INVESTMENT COMPOSITION
(1) LA COUNTY POOLED INVESTMENT FUND ON DEMAND 3.19% 27,518,206.29 $ (2) LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND ON DEMAND 3.840% 18,828,441.91 $ (3) CHANDLER ASSET MANAGEMENT 4.35% 27,690,444.70 $
Purchase Maturity Interest
(4) CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT Date Date Rate
1 RIZE FED CREDIT UNION 12/13/24 12/14/26 4.25% 245,000.00 2 FIRST SEACOAST BANK 01/27/25 01/27/27 4.15% 247,000.00 3 GOLDMAN SACHES BANK 01/28/25 01/28/27 4.15% 244,000.00 4 FIRST BUSINESS BANK 01/30/25 01/29/27 4.15% 244,000.00 5 FIRST KY BANK 01/30/25 02/01/27 4.15% 249,000.00
6 AUSTIN TELCO FED CREDIT UNION 01/31/25 02/01/27 4.25% 249,000.00 7 SOUND CREDIT UNION 01/31/25 02/01/27 4.20% 249,000.00 8 MORGAN STANLEY BANK 02/12/25 02/12/27 4.30% 244,000.00 9 MORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK 02/12/25 02/12/27 4.30% 244,000.00 10 OREGON COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION 02/24/25 02/24/27 4.30% 249,000.00 11 MERRICK BANK 02/28/25 02/26/27 4.30% 249,000.00
12 SOUTHERN STATES BANK 03/21/25 03/22/27 4.15% 249,000.00 13 TOYOTA FINANCIAL SAVINGS BANK 04/10/25 04/12/27 4.00% 245,000.00 14 UBS BANK 04/23/25 04/23/27 3.95% 249,000.00
15 AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK 04/30/25 04/30/27 4.05% 245,000.00 16 STATE BANK INDIA 05/05/25 05/05/27 4.10% 244,000.00
17 TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE BANK 05/12/25 05/12/27 4.00% 249,000.00 18 FINWISE BANK 05/21/25 05/21/27 4.00% 249,000.00
19 CONNEXUS CREDIT UNION 07/23/25 07/23/27 4.10% 245,000.00 23 PREFERRED BANK 09/03/25 09/03/26 3.93% 113,033.41
24 OPTUM BANK 09/15/25 09/15/27 3.70% 245,000.00
25 FIRST BANK 09/19/25 03/19/27 3.70% 245,000.00
26 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CREDIT UNION 09/24/25 09/24/27 3.65% 249,000.00 27 DORT FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION 10/10/25 10/12/27 3.75% 247,000.00 28 ALLIANT CREDIT UNION 10/30/25 10/30/26 4.00% 249,000.00 29 DART BANK 01/30/26 02/01/28 3.65% 245,000.00
30 CELTIC BANK 03/10/26 03/10/28 3.65% 249,000.00
31 WELLS FARGO 03/30/26 03/30/28 3.90% 249,000.00
32 FIRST UTAH BANK 03/31/26 03/31/28 3.80% 249,000.00
33 EAGLEMARK SAVINGS BANK 04/01/26 03/31/28 3.90% 245,000.00 31 WINGS CREDIT UNION 08/06/26 08/07/28 4.25% 244,000.00 32 ORIENTAL BANK 08/21/26 08/21/28 4.25% 244,000.00
33 PIMA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION 08/28/26 08/28/28 4.20% 249,000.00 01/00/00 Total CDs (33) 4.036% $ 8,010,033.41
OTHER INFORMATION:

BANK BALANCE: (1) $ 9,980,362.19
AVERAGE MATURITY DAYS 83
AVERAGE INTEREST RATE FOR THE MONTH 3.809%

THE CITY'S INVESTMENT HAS SUFFICIENT LIQUIDITY TO MEET THE CITY'S EXPENDITURE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NEXT 180 DAYS. THE 180-DAY LIQUIDITY DISCLOSURE IS REQUIRED PER GOVERNMENT CODE 53646.

THERE HAVE BEEN NO VARIANCES TO THE INVESTMENT POLICY.
(1) Bank balance is maintained to cover outstanding warrants, payroll checks and on-going operating costs.

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK

INVESTMENT REPORT
AUGUST 31, 2026

Page 83 of 208 ends

Page 84 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.C.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Diana Garcia, Assistant City Manager
Cindy Trang, Deputy City Clerk
Subject: Consideration and possible action to adopt the 2026 Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Monterey Park in accordance with the Political Reform Act Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting the resolution amending the City's Conflict of Interest Code; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

Pursuant to the Political Reform Act, Government Code § 81000, et seq., the City is required to review its Conflict of Interest Code in each even-numbered year to determine whether amendments are necessary. City staff has reviewed its previous determinations relating to disclosure levels and determined that Resolution No. 2024-R74 should be amended to include revisions consistent with existing positions in the City.

Background:

On June 3, 2026, the City Council directed the City Clerk to review the City’s Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with Government Code § 87306.5. A review of the City’s 2024 Conflict of Interest Code shows that changes are desirable as set forth below and in the accompanying draft resolution.

In developing a disclosure list for the conflict of interest code, a designated employee or commissioner is an officer, employee, member or consultant of an agency whose position is designated in the code because the position entails the making or participation in the making of governmental decisions, which may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest (Government Code § 82019).

Page 85 of 208 ends

Making a governmental decision, means the person: (1) votes on a matter; (2) appoints a person; (3) obligates or commits his or her agency to any course of action; or (4) enters into any contractual agreement on behalf of his or her agency.

Participating in the making of a decision, means the person: (1) negotiates, without significant substantive review, with a governmental entity or private person regarding the decision; or (2) advises or makes recommendations to the decision-maker by conducting research or an investigation, preparing or presenting a report, analysis or opinion which requires the exercise of judgment on the part of the employee and the employee is attempting to influence the decision.

It should be stressed that this action does not relieve any public official, employee, or designated consultant following any and all state statutes governing conflict of interest or regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission. This action is only an attempt by the City to appropriately notify the public of potential areas where a conflict may foreseeably arise in the course of these individuals carrying out their normal duties through public disclosure.

The following amendments are recommended:

Adding new positions:
• Communications Manager
• Associate Planner
• Management Analyst
• Senior Permit Technician
• Deputy Fire Chief
• Library Manager
• Senior Civil Engineer
Removing positions:
• Information Systems Specialist
• Senior Accountant
• Administrative Manager
Revising titles of existing positions:
• Business Improvement District Advisory Committee to Economic and Business Development Commission
• Senior Code Compliance Officer to Code Compliance Supervisor Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A
Fiscal Impact:

Page 86 of 208 ends

Administrative costs associated with staff review and recommendations to the City Council.

Attachments:

1. Conflict of Interest Code Resolution 2026

Page 87 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026

ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Resolution

Page 88 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 of 8 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2026 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE

FOR THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
POLITICAL REFORM ACT.

The City Council of the City of Monterey Park (“City”) does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. The Political Reform Act (Government Code §§ 81000, et seq.; the “PRA”) and regulations adopted pursuant to the PRA (2 Cal. Code of Regs. §§ 18700, et seq.; “FPPC Regs.”) require local government to adopt conflict of interest codes (“COI”).

B. The Fair Political Practices Commission promulgated FPPC Regs. § 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code that can be incorporated by reference as the City’s COI.

C. The City Council directed the City Clerk’s office to review the COI on June 3, 2026 pursuant to the PRA (Government Code § 87306.5).

D. The City Clerk finished that review and made recommendations which the City Council incorporated into this Resolution.

E. To fulfill its obligations under the PRA and FPPC Regs., the City Council adopts this 2026 Monterey Park COI as set forth in this Resolution.

SECTION 2: 2026 Monterey Park COI – Generally. FPPC Regs. § 18730 is adopted by reference as the City of Monterey Park’s 2026 COI. Except as modified in this Resolution, all requirements of FPPC Regs. § 18730 apply as if fully set forth in this Resolution.

SECTION 3: Monterey Park 2026 COI - Changes. The 2026 Monterey Park COI includes the following changes:

A. Disclosure requirements applicable to financial interests or positions in business entities also apply to equivalent interests or positions in non-profit organizations as provided in Section 7;

Page 89 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 3 of 8 ends

B. The term “Appendix” refers to Section 4 of this Resolution.

SECTION 4: Designated Officials, Employees and Consultants. For purposes of FPPC Regs. § 18730, designated employees and consultants are set forth below:

A. Designated Officials and Employees:

The positions listed below are designated positions. Officers and employees holding those positions are designated employees and are deemed to make or participate in making decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on a financial interest.

Unless otherwise indicated, all designated employees listed below are assigned to a full disclosure category and must disclose all investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income required to be disclosed under the Political Reform Act and applicable regulations. Such disclosures must be made at the times and circumstances described by the City’s Conflict of Interest Code.

Designated employees must disclose all interests as required by the Political Reform Act and regulations promulgated thereto. When a new position classification is created for City Council approval, the City Manager’s Office will recommend that the City Council decide whether the new position will be required to file a Statement of Economic Interest and be included as a designated position in the Conflict of Interest Code.

When the City Council establishes a Commission, Committee, or Board, the City Council will decide whether the members of the Commission, Committee or Boards be included as a designated position in the Conflict of Interest Code and the members of the Commission, Committee or Board so designated by the City Council, will be required to file a Statement of Economic Interest.

COUNCIL, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES & BOARDS:
* Members of the City Council
* Members of the Planning Commission
Members of the Business Improvement District Advisory Committee Members of the Economic & Business Development Commission Members of the Board of Library Trustees
Members of the Successor Agency to the Former Monterey Park Redevelopment Agency
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER:
* City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Deputy City Clerk
Communications Manager

Page 90 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 4 of 8 ends

Media Supervisor
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY:
* City Attorney
Assistant City Attorney
Deputy City Attorney
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK:

City Clerk

OFFICE OF THE CITY TREASURER:
* City Treasurer
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT:

Director of Community Development Department
Planning Manager
Economic Development Manager
Economic Development Specialist
Senior Planner
Assistant Planner
Associate Planner
Management Analyst
Building Official
Building Inspector
Plan Checker
Senior Permit Technician
FIRE DEPARTMENT:

Fire Chief
Deputy Fire Chief
Battalion Chief
Captain
Fire Marshal
Fire Safety Specialist
Senior Code Compliance Supervisor Officer
Code Compliance Officer
HUMAN RESOURCES & RISK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT:

Director of Human Resources and Risk Management

Page 91 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 5 of 8 ends

Human Resources and Risk Management Manager
Senior Management Analyst
Principal Human Resources Analyst
Human Resource Analyst

LIBRARY:

City Librarian
Library Manager
Senior Librarian
Literacy Coordinator
FINANCE DEPARTMENT:

Director of Finance
Finance Manager
Information Technology Manager
Information Systems Specialist
Senior Accountant
POLICE DEPARTMENT:

Police Chief
Police Captain
Police Lieutenant
Range Master
Technical Services Manager
Community Engagement Bureau Sergeant
Neighborhood Engagement Team Sergeant
Traffic Bureau Sergeant

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:

Director of Public Works
City Engineer
Administrative Manager
Public Works Manager
Water Utility Manager
Assistant Water Utility Manager
Senior Civil Engineer
Civil Engineering Associate
Civil Engineer Assistant
Civil Engineer Technician

RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Page 92 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 6 of 8 ends

Director of Recreation and Community Services
Recreation Manager
Recreation Supervisor
* Listed in the code for information purposes only. These positions file under Government Code Section 87200 with the Fair Political Practices Commission.

B. Consultants:

The City Manager may determine in writing that a particular consultant is hired to perform a range of duties that requires the consultant to fully comply with the disclosure requirements described in this section. Such written determination must include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager determination is a public record and must be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this conflict of interest code.”
SECTION 5: Statement of Economic Interests: Place of Filing.

Designated employees must file Statements of Economic Interests with the City of Monterey Park, on forms created by the Fair Political Practices Commission, in conformance with the individual disclosure categories and state guidelines, when requested by the City Clerk. The City Clerk will retain custody of the Statements and make them available for public inspection and reproduction. Designated employees listed in the Code with an asterisk (*) must either file their Statements directly with the Fair Political Practices Commission in conformance with California guidelines. All other designated employees must file one original copy of their Statement of Economic Interest with the City Clerk.

SECTION 6: A late fine of $10 per day up to a maximum of $100 will be assessed, commencing on the day after the form is due to the City Clerk’s office. In addition, if a matter is referred to the FPPC’s Enforcement Division for failure to file or failure to include all required economic interests, the fine may be substantially higher. If an individual does not pay a fine, the matter may be referred to the Franchise Tax Board for collection.

SECTION 7: Disclosure and Disqualification:

A. Interest and Positions in Non-Profit Organizations.

Whenever a disclosure category requires disclosure of specific financial interests or positions in business entitles, disclosure of equivalent financial interests or positions in non-profit organizations is required.

Page 93 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 7 of 8 ends

B. Proximity of Officials – Financial Interest Presumed.

It is the responsibility of the City Clerk, or designee, to prepare and maintain conflict maps for each elected and appointed public official serving on the City Council, boards, commissions, or committees. Such conflict maps must graphically depict radii lines measuring (1) 500 feet from an official’s interests in real property; and (2) 1,000 feet from an official’s interests in real property. Such radial lines must be measured from the parcel lines in accordance with FPPC Regs. Before each meeting, the City Clerk’s designee must inform public officials regarding potential conflicts based upon real property interests based upon such conflict maps.

SECTION 8: Travel Payments, Advances and Reimbursements. If a payment, including an advance or reimbursement, for travel is required to be reported pursuant to Government Code § 87207, it may be reported on a separate travel reimbursement schedule which shall be included in the filer’s statement of economic interests. A filer who chooses not to use the travel schedule shall disclose payments for travel as a gift, unless it is clear from all surrounding circumstances that the services provided were equal to or greater in value than the payments for the travel, in which case the travel may be reported as income.

SECTION 9: Resolution No. 2024-R74 (adopted September 18, 2024) and any other resolution or policy purporting to establish a conflict of interest code, are superseded by this Resolution.

SECTION 10: Repeal of any provision of any resolution or policy herein will not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution’s effective date.

Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Resolution.

SECTION 11: This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 12: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

SECTION 13: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

Page 94 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 8 of 8 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2026.
________________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor
ATTEST:

Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

KARL H. BERGER, CITY ATTORNEY
____________________________
Joaquin Vazquez, Assistant City Attorney

Page 95 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.D.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Diana Garcia, Assistant City Manager
Cindy Trang, Deputy City Clerk
Subject: Resolutions identifying officials and designating additional employees subject to mandatory ethics and fiscal and financial training requirements Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution identifying officials and designating additional employees subject to mandatory ethics training requirements pursuant to Assembly Bill 1234;

2. Adopting a Resolution identifying officials and designating additional employees subject to mandatory fiscal and financial training requirements pursuant to Senate Bill 827; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

AB 1234 requires specified local agency officials to complete ethics training. SB 827 expands the mandatory ethics training requirements to include department heads and similar administrative officers, and it establishes a new requirement that specified officials complete two hours of fiscal and financial training every two years. California law also authorizes the City Council to designate additional employees to receive each type of training.

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt two resolutions to implement these requirements and identify the officials and additional employees subject to the training requirements.

Background:

Government Code §§ 53234–53235.2 enacted by AB 1234, local agency officials must complete two hours of training in general ethics principles and ethics laws every two years. SB 827 amended these provisions to extend the ethics training requirement to department heads and other similar administrative officers. It also requires officials who begin service on or after January 1, 2026, to complete their initial ethics training within six months of beginning service.

Page 96 of 208 ends

In addition, SB 827 added Government Code §§ 53238–53238.4, which establishes a mandatory two-hour fiscal and financial training requirement for specified City officials and for employees designated by the City Council. This training must be completed at least once every two years and covers topics such as financial administration, debt management, capital financing, and the safeguarding of public resources.

Officials who began service before January 1, 2026, and remained in service on that date must complete the initial fiscal and financial training before January 1, 2028, unless their term of office ends before January 9, 2028, and at least once every two years thereafter. Officials who begin service on or after January 1, 2026, must complete the initial training within six months of beginning service and at least once every two years thereafter.

California law also authorizes the City Council to designate additional employees to receive each type of training. Accordingly, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the two attached resolutions to implement these requirements and identify the officials and employees subject to the training requirements.

The City must also provide information regarding available training at least once annually and maintain training records for at least five years. The City must maintain clear instructions and contact information on its website for requesting those records.

Strategic Plan Goal:

N/A
Fiscal Impact:

The City may incur nominal costs associated with providing these training requirements.

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution for ethics training

2. Draft Resolution for fiscal and financial training

Page 97 of 208 ends

October 7, 2026
Staff Report
Attachment 1
Draft Resolution for ethics training

Page 98 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING OFFICIALS AND DESIGNATING

ADDITIONAL EMPLOYEES SUBJECT TO MANDATORY ETHICS

TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
The City Council of the City of Monterey Park (“City”) does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. Government Code §§ 53234 through 53235.2 require specified local agency officials to complete ethics training.

B. Senate Bill 827 (“SB 827”) amended these requirements to include department heads and other similar administrative officers and to require officials who begin service on or after January 1, 2026 to complete their initial ethics training within six months after beginning service.

C. California law requires each local agency official subject to these requirements to complete at least two hours of training in general ethics principles and ethics laws relevant to the official’s public service every two years.

D. California law also authorizes the City Council to designate additional employees to receive the ethics training.

E. The City Council desires to identify the officials subject to the ethics training requirements and designate additional City employees to receive the training.

SECTION 2: Officials and Designated Employees. The officials and employees listed below must complete ethics training in accordance with this Resolution. The list includes officials who are subject to the training requirements by law and additional employees designated by the City Council to receive the training.

1. Members of the City Council

2. Members of City boards and commissions who receive compensation, salary, stipend, or reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties

3. City Manager

4. Assistant City Manager

5. City Attorney

6. Assistant City Attorney

7. Deputy City Attorney

Page 99 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 3 of 4 ends

8. Department Directors

9. Assistant Water Utility Manager

10. Building Official

11. City Librarian

12. City Engineer

13. Civil Engineer Associate

14. Communication Manager

15. Deputy City Clerk

16. Economic Development Manager

17. Finance Manager

18. Fire Chief

19. Fire Battalion Chief

20. Fire Captain

21. Fire Marshal

22. HR/RM Manager

23. IT Manager

24. Library Literacy Coordinator

25. Library Manager

26. Management Analyst

27. Planning Manager

28. Police Chief

29. Police Captain

30. Police Lieutenant

31. Principal Human Resources Analyst

32. Principal Management Analyst

33. Public Works Manager

34. Recreation Manager

35. Senior Accountant

36. Senior Civil Engineer

37. Senior Librarian

38. Water Utility Manager
SECTION 3: Officials and employees subject to this Resolution must complete at least two hours of ethics training at least once every two years. An official or employee who begins service in a position subject to this Resolution on or after January 1, 2026 must complete the initial training within six months after beginning service.

SECTION 4: The City Clerk, or designee, will provide information regarding available ethics training to officials and employees subject to this Resolution at least once annually.

SECTION 5: The City will maintain records showing the dates officials and employees satisfy the training requirements and the entity that provided the training for at least five years. The records are public records subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act. The City will maintain on its website clear instructions and contact information for requesting these records.

Page 100 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 4 of 4 ends

SECTION 6: Repeal of any provision of any resolution or policy herein will not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution’s effective date. Any such repealed part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Resolution.

SECTION 7: This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 8: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

SECTION 9: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2026.
________________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor
ATTEST:

Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

KARL H. BERGER, CITY ATTORNEY

Joaquin Vazquez, Assistant City Attorney

Page 101 of 208 ends

October 7, 2026
Staff Report
Attachment 2
Draft Resolution for fiscal and financial training

Page 102 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING OFFICIALS AND DESIGNATING

EMPLOYEES SUBJECT TO MANDATORY FISCAL AND

FINANCIAL TRAINING REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO SENATE
BILL 827
The City Council of the City of Monterey Park (“City”) does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. Senate Bill 827 (“SB 827”) added Government Code §§ 53238 through 53238.4 establishing fiscal and financial training requirements for specified local agency officials.

B. SB 827 establishes a mandatory two-hour fiscal and financial training requirement for specified City officials and employees designated by the City Council.

C. Government Code § 53238, et seq. requires a broad range of City officials to complete at least two hours of fiscal and financial training every two years, covering topics such as financial administration, fiscal management, capital financing, debt management, the prudent investor standard, safeguarding public resources, and general fiscal and financial planning.

D. SB 827 requires training to be completed in person, online, or via self-study materials with testing. Officials who began service before January 1, 2026 and remain in service on that date must complete the initial fiscal training before January 1, 2028, unless their term of office ends before January 9, 2028. Thereafter, they must complete the training at least once every two years. Officials who begin service on or after January 1, 2026 must complete the initial training within six months after beginning service and thereafter at least once every two years.

SECTION 2: Officials and Designated Employees. The officials and employees listed below must complete fiscal and financial training in accordance with this Resolution. The list includes officials who are subject to the training requirements by law and additional employees designated by the City Council to receive the training.

1. Members of the City Council

2. Members of Boards and Commissions

3. City Manager

4. Assistant City Manager

5. City Attorney

Page 103 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 3 of 4 ends

6. Assistant City Attorney

7. Deputy City Attorney

8. Department Directors

9. Assistant Water Utility Manager

10. Building Official

11. City Librarian

12. City Engineer

13. Civil Engineer Associate

14. Communication Manager

15. Deputy City Clerk

16. Economic Development Manager

17. Finance Manager

18. Fire Chief

19. Fire Battalion Chief

20. Fire Captain

21. Fire Marshal

22. HR/RM Manager

23. IT Manager

24. Library Literacy Coordinator

25. Library Manager

26. Management Analyst

27. Planning Manager

28. Police Chief

29. Police Captain

30. Police Lieutenant

31. Principal Human Resources Analyst

32. Principal Management Analyst

33. Public Works Manager

34. Recreation Manager

35. Senior Accountant

36. Senior Civil Engineer

37. Senior Librarian

38. Water Utility Manager
SECTION 3: Officials and employees subject to this Resolution must complete at least two hours of fiscal and financial training every two years. An official or employee who began service before January 1, 2026 and remained in service on that date must complete the initial training before January 1, 2028, unless their term of office ends before January 9, 2028. An official or employee who begins service on or after January 1, 2026 must complete the initial training within six months after beginning service.

SECTION 4: The City Clerk, or designee, will provide information regarding available fiscal and financial training to officials and employees subject to this Resolution at least once annually.

Page 104 of 208 ends

Resolution No.

Page 4 of 4 ends

SECTION 8: The City Clerk will certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

SECTION 9: This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October, 2026.
________________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor
ATTEST:

Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

KARL H. BERGER, CITY ATTORNEY

Joaquin Vazquez, Assistant City Attorney

Page 105 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.E.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: SGVCOG Memorandum of Agreement for SB 1383 Services and Related Budget Appropriation
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Approving an appropriation of $13,464.05 for the Senate Bill (SB 1383) Local Assistance Grant Program;

3. Taking such additional, related actions as may be necessary to implement the foregoing actions.

Executive Summary:

In June 2024, the City was awarded $161,611 through CalRecycle's SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program to support implementation of the City's SB 1383 requirements. The FY 2025-26 budget included funding for the grant; however, the amount appropriated was $13,464.05 less than the total grant award. An additional appropriation of $13,464.05 is therefore necessary to provide sufficient budget authority to fully utilize the available grant funds.

The City currently has a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SGVCOG) for SB 1383 program support consisting of three primary tasks: Program Management, Compliance Inspections, and Edible Food Recovery Program Implementation. The current MOA is nearing the end of its term, and staff is recommending approval of a new MOA with SGVCOG that would continue only the Edible Food Recovery Program Implementation task.

Under the proposed MOA, compliance inspections will be removed from SGVCOG’s scope of

Page 106 of 208 ends

work and transitioned to City staff. The City will also assume responsibility for program management activities. SGVCOG will continue to provide regional support related to edible food recovery, allowing the City to retain the benefits of the regional program while performing its local SB 1383 compliance activities directly.

Transitioning compliance inspections in-house and assuming program management activities is expected to improve operational efficiency and reduce long-term program costs. Staff is also completing a cost recovery analysis to determine the City's actual cost of conducting inspections and will return to the City Council with the results of that analysis and, if appropriate, a proposed SB 1383 Compliance Inspection Fee for consideration as part of the City's Master Schedule of Fees.

Background:

SB 1383 establishes statewide requirements intended to reduce organic waste disposal and increase the recovery of edible food that would otherwise be disposed of. As part of these requirements, jurisdictions are responsible for implementing edible food recovery programs and conducting compliance activities, including inspections of regulated edible food generators, documentation of compliance, and enforcement, as applicable.

To assist jurisdictions with implementation, CalRecycle established the SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program. The City was awarded $161,611 to support its SB 1383 implementation activities. During review of the FY 2025-26 budget, staff determined that the amount appropriated for the grant was $13,464.05 less than the total award. Approval of the additional appropriation will align the City's budget with the full grant award and allow all available grant funds to be utilized. Any grant funds that are not appropriated and expended in accordance with the grant requirements would need to be returned to CalRecycle.

Since implementation of SB 1383, the City has partnered with SGVCOG to administer portions of the Regional Food Recovery Program. Under the current MOA, SGVCOG provides three primary services: Task 1 - Program Management, Task 2 – Compliance Inspections, and Task 3 - Edible Food Recovery Program Implementation. The current MOA is approaching the end of its term, providing the City an opportunity to evaluate the services needed under a new agreement. Based on staff’s review of the program, the City can perform compliance inspections and related local program management activities more efficiently using existing City personnel. Accordingly, staff recommends entering into a new MOA with SGVCOG that retains only Task 3 – Edible Food Recovery Program Implementation. Compliance inspections, related enforcement responsibilities, and local program management activities will transition to City staff. The proposed MOA will allow the City to continue participating in SGVCOG’s regional edible food recovery efforts while performing its local SB 1383 compliance activities directly.

Bringing compliance inspections in-house will provide the City with greater oversight of local compliance activities and allow staff to evaluate a cost recovery structure based on the City's actual cost of providing the service. Staff is currently completing a cost recovery analysis and, upon completion, will return to the City Council with the results of that analysis and, if appropriate, a proposed SB 1383 Compliance Inspection Fee for consideration as part of the City's Master Schedule of Fees.

Strategic Plan Goal:

Page 107 of 208 ends

This action supports the City's Strategic Plan by maximizing available grant funding, promoting the efficient use of City resources, and implementing a cost-effective and sustainable approach to meeting the City’s SB 1383 regulatory requirements.

Fiscal Impact:

Approval of the requested $13,464.05 appropriation will provide sufficient budget authority to utilize the full $161,611 CalRecycle SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant. The appropriation is fully offset by grant revenue and will have no impact on General Fund.

The $14,902.00 SGVCOG MOA for Edible Food Recovery Program implementation services will cover November 1, 2026, through June 30, 2028. Funding is available in the FY 2026-27 Refuse Enterprise Fund 421 through June 30, 2027, with the remaining funding to be included in the FY 2027-28 budget.

Transitioning compliance inspections to City staff is expected to reduce long-term program costs. Following completion of the cost recovery analysis, staff will return to the City Council with the results of the analysis and, if appropriate, a proposed inspection fee for consideration.

Attachments:

1. San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments MOA

Page 108 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments MOA

Page 109 of 208 ends

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE SAN GABRIEL VALLEY COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND

THE CITY OF MONTEREY PARK FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE SAN GABRIEL

VALLEY REGIONAL FOOD RECOVERY PROGRAM
This Memorandum of Agreement (“MOA”) is made and entered into to be effective as of the 1st day of November, 2026 (“Effective Date”) by and between the City of Monterey Park, a municipal corporation (“City”), and the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, a California joint powers authority (“SGVCOG”). City and SGVCOG may be referred to herein collectively as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party.”

RECITALS
A. The passage of SB 1383 (Lara, 2016) implemented statewide targets to reduce statewide disposal of organic waste and increase recovery of currently disposed edible food for human consumption. Specifically, SB 1383 aims to recover at least 20% of currently disposed edible food for human consumption by 2025. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) has developed regulations entitled “Short-lived Climate Pollutants: Organic Waste Reductions” (hereafter “SLCP Regulations”), which regulations are codified at Chapter 12 of Division 7 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, sections 18981.1 et seq.

B. To recover 20% of edible food that would otherwise be sent to landfills by 2025, SB 1383 requires local jurisdictions to establish food recovery programs and strengthen their existing food recovery networks.

C. The SGVCOG was established to have a unified voice to maximize resources and advocate for regional and member interests to improve the quality of life in the San Gabriel Valley by the member cities and other local governmental agencies and has established and is administering a Regional Food Recovery Program (the “Program”).

D. The CalRecycle 1383 Local Assistance Grant funding for the Program expires on November 2, 2026. The City desires to continue receiving Program services and agrees to provide the necessary funding to the SGVCOG for the ongoing implementation of the Program.

E. City and SGVCOG desire to set forth the terms of their ongoing collaboration with respect to this effort in this MOA and further agree as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree to the following:

I. RECITALS
The above Recitals are made a substantive part of this MOA.

II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The Scope of Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference is hereby made a part of the MOA as Exhibit “A”.

III. TERM

Page 110 of 208 ends

The term of this MOA shall commence on November 1, 2026, and shall continue through June 30, 2028. The term of this MOA may be extended by mutual written MOA of the Parties.

IV. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
A. SGVCOG:

1. Designate a point-of-contact with name, title, and contact information who will serve as the SGVCOG’s Project Manager. If the point-of-contact is reassigned or no longer with the SGVCOG, a new point-of-contact will be promptly designated.

2. Oversee and implement Edible Food Recovery Program Implementation, as defined in the Program’s Scope of Work (Exhibit A).

3. Undertake procurements, execute contracts, and manage contracts, including administration, project management, and invoicing, to complete the Program set forth in the Program’s Scope of Work (Exhibit A).

4. Respond to and address City questions regarding Program implementation.

5. Coordinate regional and City-specific conference calls, meetings, and other communication with City and consultant monthly or as necessary.

B. City:

1. Maintain membership in the SGVCOG during the entire term of the Program.

2. Designate a point-of-contact to serve as the City’s Project Manager to coordinate with the SGVCOG and consultants.

3. Respond to data and information requests from the SGVCOG and its consultant(s), in a timely manner to support the implementation of the Program.

4. Participate in scheduled monthly conference calls and/or meetings with the SGVCOG and consultants throughout the implementation of the Program.

5. Provide comments and feedback on Program implementation, Program materials, and other Program deliverables to consultant or the SGVCOG, on deliverables as necessary.

6. The City remains responsible for compliance with the requirements applicable to the City under SB 1383 and its implementing regulations. SGVCOG will provide the services described in Exhibit A and may provide guidance and recommendations to facilitate the City’s compliance.

7. Remit payment to the SGVCOG in accordance to Section V.

V. INVOICING:

A. SGVCOG shall invoice City upon the execution of this Agreement for FY2026-27 and by June 1, 2027, for FY 2027-2028. The City’s payment obligations for FY 2027-28 are subject to the appropriation of funds for that fiscal year. If funds are not appropriated for FY 2027-28, the City must provide immediate written notice to SGVCOG, and in no event less than thirty (30) days prior to June 1, 2027.

B. City must remit payment to SGVCOG within thirty (30) days of receipt by City. If the invoice is not paid within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt by City, SGVCOG reserves

Page 111 of 208 ends

the right to cease Program implementation on behalf of the City until payment is received.

VI. AMENDMENTS
A. Except as specifically provided herein, any change in any of the terms and conditions of this MOA shall not have any force and effect unless a written amendment has been prepared and executed by the Parties.

VII. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
A. Program Managers.
i. For the purposes of this MOA, SGVCOG designates the following individual as its Program Manager:

Luis Garcia Chavez
Management Analyst
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
1333 S. Mayflower Ave, Suite 360
Monrovia, CA 91016
(626) 962-3552
[email protected]
ii. For the purposes of this MOA, the City designates the following individual as its Program Manager:

Patricia Cruz
Principal Management Analyst
City of Monterey Park
320 West Newmark Avenue
(626) 307-1285
[email protected]
Either Party may change the designations set forth herein upon written notice to the other Party.

VIII. TERMINATION
A. This MOA may be terminated by either Party at any time, with or without cause, by providing written notice of termination to the other Party. Such termination will be effective thirty (30) days after such notice is received.

B. If either Party terminates this MOA prior to the completion of the MOA term, SGVCOG will reconcile the actual cost of services and program implementation incurred up to the effective date of termination against the advance payments made by the City:
i. If the actual costs are less than the amount paid by the City, SGVCOG shall reimburse the unspent funds to the City within thirty (30) days of the effective date of termination.

Page 112 of 208 ends

ii. If the actual costs incurred prior to termination exceed the amount paid, SGVCOG shall issue a final invoice to the City for the difference, provided that the City’s total payments under this MOA will not exceed the City’s Program costs set forth in Exhibit B. The City shall pay the final invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt.

C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the City does not appropriate funds for FY 2027-28, then the Agreement shall automatically terminate on June 30, 2027.

IX. INDEMNIFICATION
A. Neither the SGVCOG, its member agencies, or their respective officers, employees, consultants or volunteers (the “SGVCOG Indemnitees”), shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of anything done or committed to be done by the City under or in connection with the performance of this MOA.

B. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold the SGVCOG Indemnitees harmless from and against any liability, claims, losses, actions, and expenses, including without limitation, defense costs, any costs or liability on account of bodily injury, death or personal injury of any person or for damage to or loss of use of property, any legal fees and any claims for damages of any nature whatsoever arising out of or resulting from the City’s obligations under this MOA, unless caused by the active negligence or willful misconduct of the SGVCOG Indemnitees.

C. SGVCOG agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold free and harmless the City, its employees, and volunteers, at SGVCOG’s sole expense, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, or other legal proceedings brought against the City, its employees, and volunteers arising out of or relating to the acts or omissions of SGVCOG in connection with this MOA.

X. INSURANCE
A. City and SGVCOG shall maintain and keep in full force and effect during the term of this MOA insurance or a program of self-insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise in connection with City’s or SGVCOG’s performance of its obligations hereunder.

XI. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A. Notices. All notices required or permitted to be given under this MOA shall be in writing and shall be personally delivered, or sent by electronic mail or certified mail, postage prepaid and return receipt requested, addressed as follows:

To SGVCOG: Mackenzie Bolger
Acting Sustainability Manager

Page 113 of 208 ends

San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
1333 S. Mayflower, Suite 360
Monrovia, CA 91016
(626) 214-1316
[email protected]
with a copy to: Marisa Creter
Executive Director
San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments
1333 S. Mayflower, Suite 360
Monrovia, CA 91016
(626) 457-1800
[email protected]
To City: Xochitl Tipan
Administrative Manager
320 West Newmark Avenue
Monterey Park, CA 91754
(626) 307-1383
[email protected]
with a copy to: Inez Alvarez
City Manager
320 West Newmark Avenue
Monterey Park, CA 91754
(626) 307-1497
[email protected]
B. No Partnership. This MOA is not intended to be, and shall not be construed as, an agreement to form a partnership, agency relationship, or a joint venture between the Parties. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the MOA, neither Party shall be authorized to act as an agent of or otherwise to represent the other Party.

C. Entire MOA. This MOA and any exhibits attached hereto, constitute the entire understanding between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein and supersedes any and all other prior writings and oral negotiations. This MOA may be modified only in writing and signed by the Parties in interest at the time of such modification.

D. Governing Law. This MOA shall be governed by and construed under California law and any applicable federal law without giving effect to that body of laws pertaining to conflict of laws. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this MOA, the Parties hereto agree that the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Los Angeles County, California.

E. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that there is any litigation or other legal proceeding between the Parties in connection with this MOA, each Party shall bear its own costs and

Page 114 of 208 ends

expenses, including attorneys’ fees.

F. Excusable Delays. Neither Party shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder to the extent that the performance of any such obligation is prevented or delayed by unforeseen causes including acts of God, floods, earthquakes, fires, acts of a public enemy, pandemic, epidemic, and government acts beyond the control and without fault or negligence of the affected Party. Each Party hereto shall give notice promptly to the other of the nature and extent of any such circumstances claimed to delay, hinder, or prevent performance of any obligations under this MOA and will reasonably cooperate to minimize the effect of the delay on Program implementation.

G. Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this MOA of any term, condition, or covenant of this MOA shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. No waiver of any provision of this MOA shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the Party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought.

H. Headings. The section headings contained in this MOA are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the contents to which they relate.

I. Assignment. Neither Party may assign its interest in this MOA, or any part thereof, without the prior written consent of the other Party. Any assignment without consent shall be void and unenforceable.

J. Severability. If any provision of this MOA is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

K. Authority to Execute. The person executing this MOA on behalf of a Party warrants that they are duly authorized to execute this MOA on behalf of said Party, and that by doing so said Party is formally bound to the provisions of this MOA.

L. Counterparts. This MOA may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

M. Electronic Signatures. This MOA may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code Section 16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this MOA to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

Page 115 of 208 ends

“CITY” “SGVCOG”
City of Monterey Park San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments By: By:

Inez Alvarez Marisa Creter,
City Manager Executive Director
Approved as to form:

By: Approved as to form:

City Attorney
By:

Cassie Trapesonian,
General Counsel

Page 116 of 208 ends

Exhibit “A”
Scope of Services
Task 1: Edible Food Recovery Program Implementation
SGVCOG will implement projects that ensure and enhance the region’s capacity to recover edible food, as required by SB 1383. Activities may include but are not limited to supporting the food recovery capacity of FROs or piloting other innovative approaches to increasing edible food recovery capacity. SGVCOG will provide the City, upon request, with Program records and information reasonably necessary for the City to document its compliance with SB 1383 and its implementing regulations.

Task 2: Careit Software Subscription
SGVCOG will retain a Careit Executive Account to help municipalities increase commercial edible food generator access to food recovery organizations and food recovery services. Careit is a digital food donation marketplace that matches any type of business with extra edible food to a nearby nonprofit. Nonprofits find donations in their area that match their food requirements and set up a pick-up or drop-off with the donor and their staff or volunteers. Careit includes all necessary SB 1383 record-keeping requirements for edible food generators, food recovery organizations, and food recovery services.

Through Careit:
• Businesses and nonprofits can download the Careit app and login to post their available food donations.
• Nonprofits can reserve the donations and enter the final weights. • Businesses can view a tiled photo list of all donations showing the name and contact info of the food recovery organization, list, and category of items donated, date of donation, and quantity of items donated.
• Businesses and nonprofits can see a running tally of the donations’ weight, which can be filtered by the past day, week, month, year, or all time. • Businesses and nonprofits can auto-generate a written agreement between each party for every donation recovered through the app. Written agreements are available to download on the user’s profile through their online dashboard.

With the Executive Account, all participating jurisdictions and businesses within their jurisdictions have access to the Basic Careit Account subscription. Through this subscription, all participating jurisdictions can:
• Comply with SB 1383 Section 18995.2 requirements for an implementation record • Provide a list of users from their zone to be uploaded into the Careit database • Request Careit to create user accounts for each business or organization • Generate and provide reports monthly and annually for inclusion in the CalRecycle EAR • View all donation information from entities that reside within the zone to determine SB 1383 compliance
• View aggregated information to evaluate program implementation progress communitywide
Through this subscription, all businesses within each jurisdiction can:

Page 117 of 208 ends

• Export all donation data.
• Post once and edit recurring donations to reflect scheduled pickups or reduce the need to log in and create a new donation every day.
• Track basic inventory to assist with enhanced tax deduction calculations, with automated year-end tax receipt letters.

Page 118 of 208 ends

Exhibit “B”
Budget & Invoicing Schedule
Table 1. FRESH SGV Budget Breakdown
Fresh SGV Implementation Costs Nov 1, 2026 – June 30, 2028 Task FY 26-27 FY 27-28 Total
Task 1: Edible Food Recovery Program
Implementation*
$4,900.00 $7,350.00 $12,250.00
Task 2: Careit Software Subscription (20
months)**
$2,652.00 $2,652.00
Total $7,552.00 $7,350.00 $14,902.00
*Edible Food Recovery Program Implementation costs are based on the number of Edible Food Generators (EFGs).
**Careit Software Subscription is based on the number of EFGs and FROs.

Table 2. Number of EFGs and FROs
Number of EFGs 35
Number of FROs 2
Total Sites 37
Invoice Schedule
The SGVCOG will invoice the City on the following schedule:
• Fiscal Year 26-27: Invoice will be issued upon MOA execution for services rendered from November 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027.
• Fiscal Year 27-28: Invoice will be issued by June 1, 2027, for services rendered from July 1, 2027, through June 30, 2028.

Page 119 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.F.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Request to Amend Agreement No. 1944-A with Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc. for City Vehicle Replacements
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The Public Works Department oversees the City’s fleet and has identified several vehicles that have exceeded their useful service life and require replacement. The Public Works Director (“Director”) recommends the City amend Agreement No. 1944-A with Enterprise, through the Sourcewell cooperative purchasing program, to lease 23 replacement vehicles and add the vehicles to the City fleet for 5-year terms.

Background:

The Public Works Department’s Fleet Division is responsible for the maintenance, repair, and procurement of City vehicles. The City maintains a fleet of vehicles and equipment for operational needs of Police, Fire, Public Works, Recreation and Community Services, and Community Development. The fleet consists of close to 200 light, medium, and heavy-duty vehicles including specialized public safety vehicles such as fire engines and rescue ambulances. The City has historically purchased and owned the majority of City vehicles and equipment. In 2016, following a competitive RFP process, the City entered into a Master Lease

Page 120 of 208 ends

Agreement No. 1944-A with Enterprise to lease Police Department and administrative vehicles.

The master lease agreement provides the City a cost-effective way to procure and cycle out the City’s fleet without the challenges of high upfront capital costs. Due to the success of the program, the City is recommending use of the Master lease agreement, under Sourcewell Contract #112025-EFM, through the cooperative purchasing authority in Monterey Park Municipal Code section 3.20.050(4), to replace 23 vehicles that have exceeded their useful service life and 2 additional vehicles to the City fleet. The vehicles recommended for replacements are past their useful service life, resulting in higher fuel, repair and maintenance costs due to the age and condition of the vehicles.

Vehicles acquired through this program will be leased for 5-year terms on an “open-end” basis that will allow the City to modernize its aging fleet and replace vehicles on a consistent basis with less upfront capital. It also enables the City to sell vehicles at optimal times to receive the highest resale value, which can be used as equity for leasing newer and more efficient vehicles. The City’s Fleet Maintenance Division will continue to maintain the vehicles as they do now.

Additional advantages of the open-ended, municipal lease program through Enterprise include but are not limited to, the following:
• City will retain all rights of ownership and can equip vehicles with any aftermarket equipment (toolboxes, police equipment, etc.) on the vehicles. • No mileage restrictions, abnormal wear and tear, or early termination penalties. • “Open-end” lease structure allows the City to replace more vehicles with less up-front capital and maintain a manageable, more predictable year over-year annual fleet budget. • Establish a more proactive, efficient fleet replacement plan to acquire vehicles on a more consistent basis and maintain a newer fleet.
• Reduce vehicle fuel, maintenance and repair costs.
• Enhance service delivery to the community with a more reliable fleet and less vehicle downtime.
• Reduce staff time associated with procurement of vehicles.

The vehicles to be leased are shown in the table below:

Assigned Division Year Make Model
Age
(years) Replacement Vehicle
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2002 Ford F150 24 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2004 Ford F150 22 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2004 Ford F150 22 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - PARKS 2004 Ford F150 22 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - PARKS 2005 Chevrolet
Silverado
3500 21 Ford F350
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2005 Chevrolet C3500 21 Ford F350 PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2005 Isuzu W4500 21 Ford F350
PUBLIC WORKS - PARKS 2006 GMC
Sierra
2500HD 20 Ford F250
PUBLIC WORKS - PARKS 2006 Ford F350 20 Ford F350
PUBLIC WORKS - 2006 Chevrolet Colorado 20 Ford Maverick - Hybrid

Page 121 of 208 ends

ENGINEERING
PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2006 GMC C3500 20 Ford F350
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2007 Honda Accord 19 Chevy Equinox EV PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2007 Honda Accord 19 Chevy Equinox EV PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2007 Ford F450 19 Ford F650
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2007 Chevy C2500 19 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - PARKS 2007 Ford F150 19 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2009 Chevrolet
Silverado
1500 17 Ford Maverick - Hybrid
PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2010 Ford F250 16 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2010 Ford F150 16 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2011 Ford F150 15 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2011 Ford Ranger 15 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - WATER 2013 Ford F150 13 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS - STREETS 2017 Ford F350 9 Ford Maverick - Hybrid PUBLIC WORKS – FACILITIES
(NEW VEHICLE) N/A N/A N/A N/A Ford Maverick - Hybrid
PUBLIC WORKS – WATER
(NEW VEHICLE) N/A N/A N/A N/A Ford Maverick - Hybrid
As reflected in the table, the majority of the vehicles proposed for replacement are between 15- 25 years old. The recommended replacements are right-sized vehicles that meet the City’s operational and emergency response needs while considering alternative fuel options including 16 Ford Maverick hybrids, and two Chevy Equinox – EV.

The Director explored cost-effective vehicle procurement options, including local vendors such as Camino Real Chevrolet, and identified continuation with Enterprise Fleet Management, Inc’s lease program as the most cost-effective, customized approach to transition the City’s fleet from older high-maintenance vehicles to newer, safer, and fuel-efficient models. In addition to their competitive pricing, Enterprise is part of Sourcewell purchasing cooperative. The Sourcewell contract was awarded through a competitive procurement process, and the Purchasing Agent has determined that the City may use the Sourcewell contract under Monterey Park Municipal Code section 3.20.050(4).

The Director recommends the City amend Agreement No. 1944-A with Enterprise to replace twenty-three City vehicles due for replacement and add two vehicles to the City’s fleet for a onetime cost of $204,821 and lease payments of $290,000 annually.

Strategic Plan Goal:

The proposed vehicle lease agreement supports the City’s strategic plan goal of maintaining infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our community.

Replacement of aging municipal vehicles enhances operational efficiency for City staff and residents.

Fiscal Impact:

The City anticipates procuring 25 vehicles during the first year of the program, which requires an estimated initial down payment of $204,821 and annual lease payments not to exceed $290,000 per year for five years, for a total amount not to exceed $1,654,821.

Page 122 of 208 ends

Funds for the initial down payment and first year of monthly payments are available through the Fleet Shop Fund and General Fund for vehicles powered by gasoline and hybrid engines under Capital Project No. 95051 and E0001. Funding for EVs as part of the master lease agreement will be funded through the SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District) Subvention Fund under Capital Project No. 95072. There are sufficient funds in the FY 2026- 27 budget for the proposed amendment. Funding for monthly lease payments will be requested as part of the annual budgeting process.

Attachments:

None

Page 123 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.G.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2229-AC for Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project Update
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2229-AC with the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), in a form approved by the City Attorney, for the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project, increasing the project budget by $1,500,000, from $9,000,000 to $10,500,000;

2. Appropriating $1,500,000 in Measure R funds to the FY 2026-27 budget for the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project;

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The SR-710 Mobility Improvement Projects are the result of reallocated Measure R Funds for the SR-710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion. These projects are consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR-710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway.

As part of the SR-710 North Mobility Improvements Projects, the City entered into a funding agreement with Metro for the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project with a $9,000,000 project budget. Due to anticipated increases in labor and material costs, the City requested additional funds for the project. The bids received in March 2026 confirmed the increased project costs. Metro increased the project’s budget by $1,500,000 for a total of $10,500,000. It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement 2229-AC to increase the project budget and that the City Council appropriate $1,500,000 in Measure R funds to the FY 2026-27 budget for the Project.

Page 124 of 208 ends

Background:

On March 4, 2026, staff advertised the bid for Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project (CIP) No. 96026. The bid opening was held on March 31, 2026, by the City Clerk’s Office and Public Works staff, and four bids were received from California contractors.

The project includes upgrading controllers, signal equipment, traffic signal cabinets, Hub cabinets, electrical, communication equipment, fiber optic cables, conduit, pull boxes, splice vaults, fiber distribution units (FDU), fiber patch panels, splice enclosures, Ethernet switches, aggregate Ethernet switches, core Ethernet switch, video detection systems, CCTV cameras, communications and workstation improvements at City Hall, video management system at City Hall, traffic management system upgrades, and an adaptive traffic control system at LA County Traffic Management Center (TMC), and all other incidental work in the specification document.

At the June 3, 2026 Council meeting, the City Council rejected all bids due to higher prices than estimated. City requested additional funding for the project due to overall price increases.

Metro Board approved additional funding for the project.

Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. 2229-AC for the Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project, increasing the project budget by $1,500,000, from $9,000,000 to $10,500,000.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This project meets the City’s goal to maintain, build and modernize infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our city and community as it continues the resurfacing of a major city roadway. Additionally, re-advertisement of the project supports the City’s goal to maintain fiscal stability of the City’s financial resources by seeking competitive bids that meet the project’s budget.

Fiscal Impact:

Amendment No. 2 increases the Measure R funding for Capital Improvement Project No. 96026 by $1,500,000, from $9,000,000 to $10,500,000. Costs will be reimbursed by Metro from project funds per the terms and conditions included in the Funding Agreement. An additional appropriation of $1,500,000 in Measure R funds is requested in the FY 2026-27 budget.

Attachments:

1. METRO Agreement

Page 125 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
METRO Agreement

Page 126 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMR115
Subregion ID: San Gabriel Valley
Project#: MR2.3.2.13
Amendment No. 2
FA# 9200000000MR23213
Rev: 10.26.2022 1 Measure R Funding Agreement Amendment Highways – General
AMENDMENT No. 2 TO MEASURE R FUNDING AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF MONTEREY PARK AND THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

This Amendment No. 2 to the Funding Agreement (this “Amendment”), is dated as of July 1, 2026, for reference purposes only, by and between the City of Monterey Park ("Grantee") and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("LACMTA").

RECITALS:

A. As part of the SR-710 North Mobility Improvement Projects (MIP) program Grantee and LACMTA entered into that certain Funding Agreement No. 9200000000MR23213 dated October 1, 2020, which was amended on November 18, 2024 (as amended, the "Existing FA"), which Existing FA provides for Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project, (the “Project”);
B. WHEREAS, the Grantee desires to increase the Project's budget of Measure R by $1,500,000 from $9,000,000 to $10,500,000. This amount is within the Board authorized budget increase for the Project, the total new Project budget is $10,500,000 which was approved by the LACMTA Board Box on November 21, 2025; and C. WHEREAS, the Funds are currently programmed based on the LACMTA Board Box on November 21, 2025 as follows: $10,000 in Measure R Funds in Fiscal Years (FY) 2021-22, $40,000 in FY 2022-23, $200,000 in FY 2023-24, $550,000 in FY 2024-25, $4,450,000 in FY 2025-26, and $5,250,000 in FY 2026-27. The total designated for PAED, PS&E, and Construction of the Project is $10,500,000; and
D. Grantee and LACMTA desire to amend the Existing FA as provided herein.

Page 127 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMR115
Subregion ID: San Gabriel Valley
Project#: MR2.3.2.13
Amendment No. 2
FA# 9200000000MR23213
Rev: 10.26.2022 2 Measure R Funding Agreement Amendment Highways – General
AGREEMENT:

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. Part I, Paragraph 2.2 of the Existing FA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following: “To the extent the Measure R funds are available, LACMTA shall make to GRANTEE a grant of the Measure R funds in the amount of $10,500,000 (the “Funds”) for the Project. LACMTA Board of Directors’ actions on September 26, 2019 granted the Measure R Funds for the Project. LACMTA Board Box on November 21, 2025 granted the Measure R Funds for the Project. The Funds are currently programmed over six Fiscal Years (FY) $10,000 in FY2021-22, $40,000 in FY2022-23, $200,000 in FY2023-24, $550,000 in FY2024-25, $4,450,000 in FY2025-26, and $5,250,000 in FY2026-27.

2. Part I, Paragraph 13 of the Existing FA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
“Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Attention: Betina Garcia, 99-18-2
(213) 922-4042
[email protected]”

3. Part II, Paragraph 3 of the Existing FA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following:
“3. INVOICE BY GRANTEE
Unless otherwise stated in this FA, the Monthly Progress Report or the Quarterly Expenditure Report, with supporting documentation of expenses, Project progress and other documents as required, which has been pre-approved by LACMTA, all as described in Part II, Section 6.1 of this FA, shall satisfy LACMTA invoicing requirements. Grantee shall only submit for payment, the LACMTA pre-approved Monthly Progress Report or Quarterly Expenditure Report Packets to the LACMTA Project Manager at the email address shown in Part I and to LACMTA Account Payable Department as shown below.

Submit invoice with supporting documentation to:

[email protected] (preferable)
or
mail to:

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Accounts Payable
P. O. Box 512296
Los Angeles, CA 90051-0296

Page 128 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMR115
Subregion ID: San Gabriel Valley
Project#: MR2.3.2.13
Amendment No. 2
FA# 9200000000MR23213
Rev: 10.26.2022 3 Measure R Funding Agreement Amendment Highways – General
All invoice material must contain the following information:

Re: LACMTA Project ID# MR2.3.2.13 and FA# 9200000000MR23213 Betina Garcia; Mail Stop 99-18-2”

4. Part II, Section 9.1 (vi) of the Existing FA is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following: “(vi) Expending the Funds granted under this FA for allowable costs by the lapsing date. All Funds programmed for FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23, FY 2023-24, and FY 2024-25 are no longer available. All Funds programmed for FY 2025-26 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2028. All Funds programmed for FY 2026-27 are subject to lapse by June 30, 2029.”

5. Attachment A of the Existing FA is hereby replaced by Attachment A-1, attached.

6. Attachment B-1 of the Existing FA is hereby replaced by Attachment B-1-1, attached.

7. Attachment C of the Existing FA is hereby replaced by Attachment C-1, attached.

8. Attachment E FTIP Sheet of the Existing FA is hereby replaced by Attachment E-1, attached.

9. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Existing FA remains in full force and effect as originally executed. All rights and obligations of the parties under the Existing FA that are not expressly amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged.

Page 129 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMR115
Subregion ID: San Gabriel Valley
Project#: MR2.3.2.13
Amendment # 2
FA# 9200000000MR23213
Rev.: 03.08.2023 4 Measure R Funding Agreement Amendment Highways – General
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment No. 2 to the FA to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the dates indicated below:

LACMTA:

LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY By: ________________________________________ Date: ____________________ Stephanie Wiggins
Chief Executive Officer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

DAWYN R. HARRISON
County Counsel
By: ________________________________________ Date: ____________________ Deputy
GRANTEE:

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK
By: _______________________________________ Date: ____________________ Inez Alvarez
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By: _______________________________________ Date: ____________________ Karl H. Berger
City Attorney
June 9, 2026

Page 130 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMR115
SOURCES OF FUNDS FY2021-22 FY2022-23 FY2023-24 FY2024-25 FY2025-26 FY2026-27 Total Budget
% of Budget

LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDING
MEASURE R FUNDS $ 10,000 $ 40,000 $ 200,000 $ 550,000 $ 4,450,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 10,500,000 PROP C 25% $ - 0%
SUBTOTAL $ - $ -

LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS BY
YEAR SUBTOTAL $ 10,000 $ 40,000 $ 200,000 $ 550,000 $ 4,450,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 10,500,000 100% OTHER SOURCES OF FUNDING:

LOCAL: $ - 0%
STATE: $ - 0%
FEDERAL: $ - 0%
PRIVATE OR OTHER: $ - 0%
OTHER FUNDING SUBTOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0%
TOTAL PROJECT FUNDS $ 10,000 $ 40,000 $ 200,000 $ 550,000 $ 4,450,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 10,500,000 100% ATTACHMENT A-1 - PROJECT FUNDING
Measure R Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA# 9200000000MR23213 Project Title: Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project Project#: MR2.3.2.13

PROGRAMMED BUDGET - SOURCES OF FUNDS
Rev. 05.03.19 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment A-1 Project Funds

Page 131 of 208 ends

SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2022-23
Qtr 1
FY 2022-23
Qtr 2
FY 2022-23
Qtr 3
FY 2022-23
Qtr 4
FY 2023-24
Qtr 1
FY 2023-24
Qtr 2
FY 2023-24
Qtr 3
FY 2023-24
Qtr 4
TOTAL
BUDGET
LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS:

MEASURE R FUNDS:

PAED $4,593 $15,408 $20,000
PS&E $18,763 $6,833 $25,595
RW Support $0
Const. Support $0
RW $0
Construction $0
Total MEASURE R $0 $0 $4,593 $0 $34,170 $0 $6,833 $0 $45,595 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $0 $0 $4,593 $0 $34,170 $0 $6,833 $0 $45,595

PROJECT FUNDING
FY22-23 and FY23-24 $0 $0 $4,593 $0 $34,170 $0 $6,833 $0 $45,595 SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2024-25
Qtr 1
FY 2024-25
Qtr 2
FY 2024-25
Qtr 3
FY 2024-25
Qtr 4
FY 2025-26
Qtr 1
FY 2025-26
Qtr 2
FY 2025-26
Qtr 3
FY 2025-26
Qtr 4
TOTAL
BUDGET
LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS:

MEASURE R FUNDS:

PAED $0
PS&E $198,684 $12,496 $155,206 $302,758 $59,618 $45,079 $117,782 $117,782 $1,009,405 RW Support $0
Const. Support $264,000 $264,000
RW $0
Construction $1,625,000 $1,625,000
Total MEASURE R $198,684 $12,496 $155,206 $302,758 $59,618 $45,079 $117,782 $2,006,782 $2,898,405 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $198,684 $12,496 $155,206 $302,758 $59,618 $45,079 $117,782 $2,006,782 $2,898,405

PROJECT FUNDING
FY24-25 and FY25-26 $198,684 $12,496 $155,206 $302,758 $59,618 $45,079 $117,782 $2,006,782 $2,898,405 SOURCES OF FUNDS FY 2026-27
Qtr 1
FY 2026-27
Qtr 2
FY 2026-27
Qtr 3
FY 2026-27
Qtr 4
FY 2027-28
Qtr 1
FY 2027-28
Qtr 2
FY 2027-28
Qtr 3
FY 2027-28
Qtr 4
TOTAL
BUDGET
LACMTA PROGRAMMED FUNDS:

MEASURE R FUNDS:

PAED $0
PS&E $0
RW Support $0
Const. Support $264,000 $264,000 $264,000 $264,000 $1,056,000 RW $0
Construction $1,625,000 $1,625,000 $1,625,000 $1,625,000 $6,500,000 Total MEASURE R $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,556,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS: $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,556,000

PROJECT FUNDING
FY26-27 and FY27-28 $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $1,889,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,556,000

SUMMARY OF ALL FUNDS
PAED $0 $0 $4,593 $0 $15,408 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
PS&E $198,684 $12,496 $155,206 $302,758 $78,381 $45,079 $124,614 $117,782 $1,035,000 RW Support $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Const. Support $264,000 $264,000 $264,000 $264,000 $0 $0 $0 $264,000 $1,320,000 RW $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Construction $1,625,000 $1,625,000 $1,625,000 $1,625,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,625,000 $8,125,000 TOTAL MILESTONES $2,087,684 $1,901,496 $2,048,799 $2,191,758 $93,788 $45,079 $124,614 $2,006,782 $10,500,000 SUM PROG LACMTA FUNDS $2,087,684 $1,901,496 $2,048,799 $2,191,758 $93,788 $45,079 $124,614 $2,006,782 $10,500,000 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING $2,087,684 $1,901,496 $2,048,799 $2,191,758 $93,788 $45,079 $124,614 $2,006,782 $10,500,000 ATTACHMENT B-1-1 - EXPENDITURE PLAN COST & CASH FLOW BUDGET Measure R Program - Funding Agreement Projects - FA# 9200000000MR23213 Project Title: Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control System Project Project#: MR2.3.2.13

PROGRAMMED SOURCES OF FUNDS

Page 132 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMRl15 Project#: MR2.3.2.13
FA# 9200000000MR23213
Rev: 05.03.19 1 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C-1 Scope of Work
ATTACHMENT C-1

SCOPE OF WORK
PROJECT TITLE:

Monterey Park Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project PROJECT LOCATION:

The project islocated on the following intersections in the City of Monterey Park, in the San Gabriel Valley subregion.

Along Atlantic Boulevard at the following signalized intersections:

1. Atlantic Boulevard/Hellman Avenue

2. Atlantic Boulevard/ ShoppingCenter

3. Atlantic Boulevard/Emerson Avenue

4. Atlantic Boulevard/ ShoppingCenter

5. Atlantic Boulevard/Garvey Avenue

6. Atlantic Boulevard/Newmark Avenue

7. Atlantic Boulevard/Harding Avenue

8. Atlantic Boulevard/El Portal Place

9. Atlantic Boulevard/Cadiz Street

10. Atlantic Boulevard/Sevilla Street

11. Atlantic Boulevard/El Repetto Drive

12. Atlantic Boulevard/Brightwood Street

13. Atlantic Boulevard/Floral Drive

14. Atlantic Boulevard/ Shopping Center

15. AtlanticBoulevard/CesarChavez Avenue-Riggin Street
Along Garfield Avenue at the following signalized intersections:

1. Garfield Avenue/Hellman Avenue

2. Garfield Avenue/Hampton Avenue

3. Garfield Avenue/Hilliard Avenue

4. Garfield Avenue/Emerson Avenue

5. Garfield Avenue/ AvondaleAvenue

6. Garfield Avenue/Garvey Avenue

7. Garfield Avenue/Newmark Avenue

8. Garfield Avenue/Graves Avenue

9. Garfield Avenue/El Repetto Drive

10. Garfield Avenue/Elmgate Street

11. Garfield Avenue/Riggin Street
Along Garvey Avenue at the following signalized intersections:

1. Garvey Avenue/Atlantic Boulevard (included in Atlantic Boulevard)

2. Garvey Avenue/Chandler Avenue

3. Garvey Avenue/Ynez Avenue

4. Garvey Avenue/McPherrin Avenue

5. Garvey Avenue/Ramona Avenue

6. Garvey Avenue/Garfield Avenue (included in Garfield Avenue)

7. Garvey Avenue/Lincoln Avenue

8. Garvey Avenue/Nicholson Avenue

Page 133 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMR115 Project#: MR2.3.2.13
FA# 9200000000MR23213
Rev: 05.03.19 2 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C-1 Scope of Work

9. Garvey Avenue/Alhambra Avenue

10. Garvey Avenue/Orange Avenue

11. Garvey Avenue/New Avenue
PROJECT LIMITS:

This project limits are at the intersections of above signalized locations, including any necessary improvements on the approaches required by signal design.

NEXUS TO HIGHWAY OPERATION, DEFINITION/PROJECT PURPOSE:

The Monterey Park Adaptive Traffic/Traffic Responsive Control Project (Atlantic, Garfield and Garvey) is an eligible SR-710 North Corridor Mobility Improvement approved by the Metro Board of Directors on September 26, 2019. The project contributes to mobility and operational benefits in the SR-710 corridor between I-10 and I-210 consistent with the Purpose and Need of the 710 Gap Closure project.

The project will upgrade the traffic signal system, and other components at major north-south and eastwest corridors to improve the traffic operations and mobility in the City. These improvements will be planned and developed in conjunction with adjacent cities to ensure that traffic operations are coordinated through major corridors within the SR-710 area.

PROJECT BACKGROUND:

The proposed project was identified, and was awarded LACMTA Measure R funding, as part of a broader package of projects known as the SR-710 Mobility Improvement Projects (MIPS). The SR710 MIPS are the result of reallocated Measure R Fundsfor the SR-710 North Project to new mobility improvement projects within the San Gabriel Valley subregion. These projects are consistent with the purpose and need of the Gap Closure Project to relieve congestion on local streets along the SR710 alignment between Interstates 10 and 210, with the highest priority for projects proximate to the Interstate 10 freeway.

The project will improve traffic progression along these corridors in the City. The corridors currently operate at level of service (LOS) D and are forecast to operate at LOS E and F by 2040 without improvements. These corridors are primary arterials which carry significant regional and local traffic.

PROJECT BUDGET:

COMPONENT AMOUNT
PA/ED $20,000
PS&E $1,035,000
Construction Support $1,320,000
Construction Capital $8,125,000
Total Budget $10,500,000
SCOPE:

The project will upgrade existing traffic signals and controllers and firmware at signalized intersections and provide fiber optic cable connectivity to all ofthese traffic signal intersections. The traffic signal controller manufacturer and firmware will be determined during the design phase and may include adaptive traffic control system or traffic responsive features, as it is appropriate and feasible for this project. The main purpose of the project is to improve traffic operations, mobility, and safety for the major arterials that run through the City. The design and implementation of traffic elements and actual locations will be determined during the design phase, which will include the following improvements:

Page 134 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMRll5 Project#: MR2.3.2.13
FA#9200000000MR23213
Rev: 05.03.19 3 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment CScope of Work
• Upgrade existing traffic signal controllers and cabinets as required (TBD during Design). • Install fiber optic communication network along major arterials (new conduits & cables) to improve traffic operations (subject to the design phase). • Install Ethernet switches at existing controller cabinets. • Install communication hubs.
• Install vehicle detection (e.g. loop, video) systems (TBD during Design). • Design and implement CCTV camera system (TBD during Design). • Update traffic signal timing and traffic signalsynchronizationto provide optimization oftraffic flow for the AM and PM peak hours.
• Design and implement a new central traffic signal management system (software and communication equipment) to monitor and control all of the signalized intersections within the City. The isolated intersections not directly on the corridors will be connected to the Central Traffic Management System via wireless or other means for the purpose of monitoring and control as specified above.

At the completion of the design phase, the City shall inform the Metro Project manager of the number of controllers and equipment needed to upgrade the traffic signal system, and the type of traffic control system they will deploy. In addition, the City shall coordinate the system design through Metro staff to coordinate with other Metro-funded intersection projects, ensure compatibility with existing transit signal priority capabilities, and allow communication with the County of Los Angeles Information Exchange Network (IEN).

DESIGN:

I. Preliminary Design
Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following:

A. Conduct field visits ofthe project area to identify design issues. Record existing site conditions in photographs and/or video.

B. Conduct survey ofthe project area, establishing horizontal and vertical controlfor the project as necessary.

C. Identify and coordinate with all utilities in the project area to facilitate the final design of the Project.

D. Verify if a geotechnical survey will be necessary. If yes, conduct geotechnical investigations as necessary.

E. Verifyifright-of-way (R/W) acquisitions and/or vacations willbenecessary.At this point all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W.

F. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and establish required environmental, review, approval and permitting process.

G. Prepare construction cost estimate.

II. Environmental Analysis
It is anticipated this project will be either an exempt project or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following:

A. Prepare Initial Study (IS), consistent with CEQA Guidelines.

B. If IS results in any impacts, prepare MND or any other applicable environmental document as necessary.

C. Prepare the Draft IS and Draft MND for public circulation as necessary, respond

Page 135 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMRll5 Project#: MR2.3.2.13
FA#9200000000MR23213
Rev: 05.03.19 4 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment CScope of Work
to questions and comments, and finalize the environmental process.

D. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W for required environmental review and approval.

III. Final Design
Tasks to be performed include, but are not limited to, the following:

A. Prepare plans for the required improvements, consistent with City and/or Caltrans format.

B. Assist the City for any Community Information Workshop if necessary.

C. Prepare construction specifications.

D. Prepare an engineer's construction cost estimate based on the itemized quantity take-off from the contract documents.

E. Coordinate with Caltrans for work within Caltrans R/W and obtain required approval and permits.

F. Complete Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) BidPackage.

IV. Project Management
Grantee expects to provide overall project and program management, funding management through its in-house staff, and consultant.

RIGHT-OF-WAY:

At this point, all work assumed to be within existing City and Caltrans R/W .

CONSTRUCTION:

The construction contract will be bid out per Public Contract Code and City requirements. Grantee expects to provide construction management, inspection, contract administration, funding management through its in-house staff and consultant.

Page 136 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMR115 Project#: MR2.3.2.13
FA#9200000000MR23213
Rev: 05.03.19 5 FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C-1 Scope of Work
MILESTONES: The implementation schedule for this project will be as follows:

FA Milestones
Amendment No. 1 Schedule Revised Project Schedule
Start Date End Date Start Date End Date
PE Solicitation Jan 2022 Dec 2022 March 2023 April 2023 Planning Mar 2023 Sept 2023 August 2023 July 2024
PA&ED Jan 2023 Dec 2024 August 2023 July 2024
PS&E   Aug 2023 Dec 2024 September 2024 October 2025
Jurisdictional
Review, Approvals,
and Permits
Feb 2026 May 2026 May 2025 December 2025
Construction May 2026 Jun 2027 March 2026 April 2027
Total Project Duration
(Months) 66 50

Page 137 of 208 ends

FTIP #: LAMIPMRll5 Project#: MR2.3.2.13
FA#9200000000MR23213
FA Measure R Hwys Gen Attachment C Scope of
Work
Rev: 05.03.19 6
ATTACHMENT C-1 - Location Map(s)
Traffic Signals

CITY OF MONTEREY PARK
L.A. COUNTY
STATE

MONTEBELLO
'ALHAMBRA

FLASHER
• • • • • PROJECT LOCATIONS ARTERIALS

Page 138 of 208 ends

Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Authority
2025 Federal Transportation Improvement Program ($000)
TIP ID LAMIPMR115 Implementing Agency Monterey Park, City of SCAG RTP Project #: 1ITS04
Conformity Category: TCM
Project Description: Upgrade existing traffic signals & controllers & firmware at 35 signalized intersections; provide fiber optic connectivity to traffic signal intersections along major arterials; install ethernet switches, communication hubs, & vehicle detection; update traffic signal timing and synchronization. May include adaptive traffic control system or traffic responsive features as appropriate or feasible.

Study:N/A Is Model: YES Model #:

PM: Frank Lopez - (626)307-1330
LS: N LS GROUP#:

EA #: PPNO:

Program Code: ITS02 - SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION Stop Loc:

Air Basin: SCAB Envir Doc: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS -- CEQA - 07/31/2024
Uza: Los Angeles-Long
Beach-Santa Ana
Sub-Area: Sub-Region: San Gabriel Valley
COG
CTIPS ID:

Lane # Extd: 5 Lane # Prop: 5 Imprv Desc: traffic signal sync Toll Rate: Hov acs eg loc:

0.00 Toll Colc Loc: Toll Method:

System :Local Hwy Route : Postmile: Distance: Phase: Engineering/Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) Completion Date 03/31/2030 PHASE PRIOR 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 BEYOND PROG TOTAL MR20H - Measure R 20% Highway PE $1,055 $0 $0 $1,055
CON
RW
SUBTOTAL $1,055 $4,195 $5,250 $10,500
$0 $4,195 $5,250 $9,445
$0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL $1,055 $4,195 $5,250
TOTAL PE: $1,055 TOTAL RW: $0 TOTAL CON: $9,445
$10,500
TOTAL PROGRAMMED: $10,500
- General Comment: Metro Board approved additional $1.5M in CON to address cost increase - Modeling Comment: Metro Board approved additional $1.5M in CON to address cost increase - TCM Comment: Metro Board approved additional $1.5M in CON to address cost increase - Amendment Comment:
- CMP Comment:
- Narrative:

Last Revised Amendment 25-25 - Submitted Change reason:COST INCREASE Total Project Cost $10,500

Page 1 ends

Attachment E-1

Page 139 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.H.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Scott Wiese, Police Chief
Subject: Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

2. Adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to receive and appropriate grant funds in Fiscal Year 2026-27; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The City of Monterey Park Police Department was notified of an award of $192,000 from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The Police Department will utilize the grant funding to continue its education and enforcement of traffic related laws to reduce injury and fatal traffic collisions.

Background:

The Office of Traffic Safety distributes federal funding apportioned to California under the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The California Office of Traffic Safety’s mission is to effectively and efficiently administer traffic safety grant funds to reduce traffic deaths, injuries, and economic losses. Grants are used to mitigate traffic safety deficiencies, expand ongoing activity, or develop innovative programs.

In 2025, the City of Monterey Park experienced a total of 540 traffic collisions, of which 213 were injury collisions with 279 total injured and 2 fatalities. The STEP grant supports the Police

Page 140 of 208 ends

Department’s efforts to reduce DUI related traffic collisions and enhances enforcement efforts that concentrate on factors contributing to traffic collisions, such as alcohol, speed, red light violations and unsafe turning movements.

The Monterey Park Police Department’s STEP grant total conditional grant allocation is $192,000.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This item meets the Council Strategic Plan goal of maintaining stability of the City's fiscal resources by pursuing grants and funding opportunities for key projects.

Fiscal Impact:

Staff requests approval for the Finance Director to appropriate $192,000 in grant funding for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget. There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund.

Attachments:

1. Tentative Approval Letter for OTS Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Funding

2. Resolution

Page 141 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7th, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
Tentative Approval Letter for OTS Selective Traffic
Enforcement Program Funding

Page 142 of 208 ends

Page 143 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7th, 2026
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution

Page 144 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7th, 2026
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE,

TO RECEIVE AND APPROPRIATE GRANT FUNDS FOR THE OFFICE

OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT

PROGRAM (STEP) GRANT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Monterey Park as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:

A. The City applied for the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Grant Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

B. The Monterey Park Police Department will utilize the grant funding to reduce and mitigate the impacts of impaired driving in our community.

C. The City will receive $192,000.00 from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for the STEP Grant Fund.

SECTION 2: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to receive and appropriate grant funds from OTS’s Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) to be used to reduce and mitigate the impacts of impaired driving.

SECTION 3: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute any required documents and agreements to receive the grant for purposes identified herein.

SECTION 4: Severability. Suppose any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction. In that case, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provision or application and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.

SECTION 5: Electronic Signatures. This Resolution may be executed with electronic signatures in accordance with Government Code §16.5. Such electronic signatures will be treated in all respects as having the same effect as an original signature.

SECTION 6: Recordation. The Mayor, or presiding officer, is authorized to sign this Resolution signifying its adoption by the City Council of the City of Monterey Park and the City Clerk, or his duly appointed deputy, may attest thereto.

SECTION 7: Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.

Page 145 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7th, 2026
Resolution No.

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October 2026.
________________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
__________________________

Page 146 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.I.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Scott Wiese, Police Chief
Subject: Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Grant for Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Accepting grant funds and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, with the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in the amount of $28,500 for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program;

2. Adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to receive and appropriate grant funds in Fiscal Year 2026-27; and

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The City of Monterey Park Police Department was notified of an award of $28,500 from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. The Police Department will utilize the grant funding to continue its education of the community on pedestrian and bicycle safety to reduce injury and fatal traffic collisions.

Background:

In 2025, the City of Monterey Park experienced a total of 540 traffic collisions, of which 213 were injury collisions with 279 total injured and 2 fatalities. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program supports the Monterey Park Police Department’s efforts to educate the community on

Page 147 of 208 ends

pedestrian traffic safety, bicycle safety, and traffic laws.

The Monterey Park Police Department’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program grant total approved allocation is $28,500.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This item meets the Council Strategic Plan goal of maintaining stability of the City's fiscal resources by pursuing grants and funding opportunities for key projects.

Fiscal Impact:

Staff requests approval for the Finance Director to appropriate $28,500 in grant funding for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget. There is no fiscal impact on the general fund.

Attachments:

1. Tentative Approval Letter for OTS Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Funding

2. Resolution

Page 148 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
Tentative Approval Letter for OTS Pedestrian and
Bicycle Safety Program Funding

Page 149 of 208 ends

Page 150 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
ATTACHMENT 2
Resolution

Page 151 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE,

TO RECEIVE AND APPROPRIATE GRANT FUNDS FOR THE OFFICE

OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) PEDESTRIAN & BICYCLE SAFETY

PROGRAM GRANT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Monterey Park as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds as follows:

A. The City applied for the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Grant Funding for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

B. The Monterey Park Police Department will utilize the grant funding to reduce and mitigate the impacts of traffic-related pedestrian and bicycle safety in our community.

C. The City will receive $28,500.00 from the OTS Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Program Grant Fund.

SECTION 2: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to receive and appropriate grant funds from OTS’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety to be used to reduce and mitigate the impacts of traffic-related pedestrian and bicycle safety.

SECTION 3: The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute any required documents and agreements to receive the grant for purposes identified herein.

SECTION 7: Effective Date. This Resolution will become effective immediately upon adoption and will remain effective unless repealed or superseded.

Page 152 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
Resolution No.

Page 2 of 2 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 7th day of October 2026.
________________________________
Henry Lo, Mayor
Attest:
__________________________
Maychelle Yee, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:

Karl H. Berger, City Attorney
__________________________

Page 153 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.J.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Robert Aguirre, Director of Recreation & Community Services Subject: Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to apply for, receive and appropriate funds for the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (“SPP”) Grant for proposed improvements to the Barnes Park Pool
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

1. Adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to apply for, receive and appropriate funds for the SPP Grant for proposed improvements to Barnes Park; and

2. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

Executive Summary:

The Barnes Park Pool has remained closed since 2021 due to its deteriorating condition and inadequate recirculation system. Additionally, the facility no longer meets current accessibility requirements pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).

The Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (“SPP”) grant provides an opportunity to apply for grant funding to support the development of the Barnes Park Aquatic Center. A resolution approving an application is a requirement of the SPP grant and therefore the Director recommends the adoption of the attached resolution.

Background:

Administered by the California State Parks Department, the Statewide Park Development and Community Revitalization Program (SPP) is a competitive grant program focused on creating new parks and new recreational opportunities in critically underserved communities throughout California. This round of grants is funded through Proposition 4, the Safe Drinking Water, Wildfire Prevention, Drought Preparedness, and Clean Air Bond Act of 2024. SPP allows for

Page 154 of 208 ends

Grant Applications between $200,000 - $8,500,000. Applications are due December 17, 2026.

The SPP grants are highly competitive and are evaluated based on several criteria including critical lack of park space, project type, significant poverty, and climate vulnerability. The proposed Barnes Park Pool Project serves a severely disadvantaged community, as determined by the California State Park Per-Capita Income Tool. There are approximately two acres of open space per 1,000 residents, compared to the LA County average of 3.3 acres per 1,000 residents.

Historically, the Barnes Park Pool served the community by providing access to physical fitness through swimming activities, swimming education classes, training and competition facilities for swimming and water polo teams, recreational space for fun and relaxation during the warm months, and a positive environment for socializing. Currently, George Elder Pool is serving all aquatics programs.

The proposed project would include site preparation, construction of new pools, including a recirculation system, a new mechanical room and concrete deck, energy-efficient lighting, shade structures for viewing areas, and a new administrative facility with ADA-compliant locker rooms.

In March 2026, the City Council approved a conceptual design for the proposed Barnes Park Aquatic Center. The City has been awarded a $500,000 grant from Los Angeles County Measure A and a $6 million grant from the California State Parks, Land Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) for the project, which requires matching funds of $6 million. The construction of the Barnes Park Aquatic Center is estimated to cost between $28 and $32.5 million. The City continues to advance the project by actively seeking grants, public funds, and partnerships to bring the vision of a new aquatic center to life.

The required resolution certifies that the City has or will have sufficient funding to complete, operate, and maintain the project. The resolution also authorizes the City Manager, as the City’s authorized representative, to conduct negotiations and sign and submit documents necessary to complete the grant scope, including applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests.

If awarded, the SPP grant can be utilized toward the match requirement for the LWCF grant.

Strategic Plan Goal:

This item meets the strategic goal to “Maintain, build and modernize Infrastructure and facilities to support the current and future needs of our city and community” by providing funding to help build the Barnes Park Aquatic Center.

Fiscal Impact:

There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with submitting the SPP grant application. If awarded, the grant could provide between $200,000 and $8.5 million in funding toward the Barnes Park Aquatic Center project and may be used to satisfy a portion of the $6 million matching-fund requirement associated with the City’s $6 million LWCF grant.

The total project cost is currently estimated at $28 million to $32.5 million. The City has

Page 155 of 208 ends

secured $500,000 in Los Angeles County Measure A funding and a $6 million LWCF grant, subject to the required $6 million match. Any additional local funding required to complete the project, including the City’s required match and future operations and maintenance costs, would be subject to City Council approval and the availability of appropriated funds. Staff is requesting that City Council authorize the Finance Director to appropriate the SPP grant funds into the appropriate City budget upon award and receipt of the grant.

Attachments:

1. Authorizing Resolution

Page 156 of 208 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Authorizing Resolution

Page 157 of 208 ends

Page 158 of 208 ends

City Council Staff Report
Date: October 7, 2026
Agenda Item Number: 10.K.

To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Shawn Igoe, Public Works Director
Subject: Consideration and possible action to adopt a Resolution declaring a local emergency resulting from the developing 2026–2027 El Niño event and authorizing the City Manager to directly negotiate contracts pursuant to Public Contract Code §§ 20168 and 22050
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the City Council consider:

3. Taking such additional, related, action that may be desirable.

CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act):

Executive Summary:

On September 21, 2026 Governor Newsom proclaimed a state of emergency in response to the developing 2026-2027 El Niño season (“Event”) which is expected to strengthen, potentially becoming the strongest in recorded history. The Governor’s proclamation calls for advance preparation before severe weather intensifies, including coordination with local governments, pre-positioning resources, and expedited work to reduce flood and other stormPage 159 of 208 related risks. While the City prepares for the Event’s impacts, the Public Works Director (“Director”), Fire Chief (“Chief”), and Police Chief (“Chief”) have identified risks to City operations and emergency responses due to the Event’s expected magnitude. The Director and Chiefs recommend that the City Council declare a local emergency resulting from the developing Event to protect public health, safety, and general welfare.

Background:

Following the Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency (“Proclamation”) due to the Event and expert predictions that the Event will reach historic strength during the October through December 2026 season, exceeding the strength of all prior el Niño events in the historical record since 1950, staff recommends that the City Council declare a local emergency. The proposed action would allow the City to prepare for and respond to the Event’s anticipated impacts for several reasons including, without limitation, the following:
• The Governor’s September 21, 2026 Proclamation directs the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services to coordinate statewide preparedness activities and work with local governments on emergency planning, resource coordination, and request for assistance for potential severe weather, flooding, coastal flooding, erosion, mud and debris flows, and related impacts associated with conditions resulting from the Event, including atmospheric rivers and other severe storm systems.
• The anticipated impacts may require the City to pre-position personnel, equipment, supplies, commodities, and other resources based on forecast conditions, local needs, and identified risks. The Proclamation similarly recognizes the need for government agencies to procure, maintain, stage, pre-position, distribute, and replenish flood-fight supplies, equipment (including, without limitation, sandbags, riprap and other rock materials, plastic sheeting, and pumps), and other materials necessary to support local and regional flood preparedness, response, and protective actions in connection with the Event
• The potential impacts are expected to result in increased prices for construction products and contractor services. The City may need to procure equipment, supplies, services, or public works on an expedited basis when necessary to prepare for, prevent, mitigate, respond to, or recover from the impacts of the Event. • The Proclamation authorizes California state agencies to enter into contracts to arrange for the procurement of materials, goods, and services necessary to quickly assist with the response to and recovery from the impacts of this emergency. Applicable provisions of the Government Code and the Public Contract Code, including without limitation, travel, advertising, and competitive bidding requirements, are suspended to the extent necessary to address the effects of this emergency. The City must rely on its own authority under applicable California law for emergency contracting. • The City anticipates expending public resources (personnel, equipment, fuel, etc.) while preparing for and responding to this emergency. It is in the public interest for the City to seek reimbursement from federal and California agencies for eligible costs.

The Governor’s Proclamation recognizes the need to act before severe storms arrive. It directs state agencies to prioritize assistance for local efforts involving flood management infrastructure repairs, vegetation management, debris removal, sediment management, bridge scour protection, and channel capacity improvements. The City may similarly need to undertake work before severe weather arrives to protect City infrastructure and essential public

Page 160 of 208 ends

services.

Ordinarily, the Public Works Department would schedule bidding in accordance with the Public Contract Code. Public Contract Code § 20168 requires a four-fifths vote of the City Council to find that public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property because of an emergency. The developing Event demonstrates the need for a proactive approach to emergency preparedness.

While the City continues to assess the developing Event’s impacts, the proposed Resolution would allow the City to take appropriate emergency preparedness and response measures to protect public health and safety. The Chief, Police Chief, and Director recommend that City Council adopt the proposed resolution and authorize the City Manager to take appropriate action in response to the emergency, subject to applicable law.

Strategic Plan Goal:

The proposed resolution meets the City’s strategic goal to ensure public safety with a modernized and community-oriented approach by being proactive in the City’s Emergency preparedness efforts as it prepares for the Event.

Fiscal Impact:

There are various costs associated with implementing the proposed Resolution. Some of these were previously budgeted, e.g., storm supplies and preparedness efforts. Others, however, are unknown at this time, e.g., the full cost of providing mutual aid. To the extent practicable, the City will seek full recovery of its costs.

Attachments:

1. Draft Resolution

2. Governor's Proclamation

Page 161 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
ATTACHMENT 1
Draft Resolution

Page 162 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

MONTEREY PARK DECLARING A LOCAL EMERGENCY
RESULTING FROM THE DEVELOPING 2026-2027 EL NIÑO

EVENT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO DIRECTLY

NEGOTIATE CONTRACTS PURSUANT TO PUBLIC CONTRACT
CODE §§ 20168 AND 22050
The City Council does resolve as follows:

SECTION 1: The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. On September 21, 2026, Governor Gavin Newsom proclaimed a statewide state of emergency in response to the developing 2026- 2027 El Niño event (“Event”). The Governor’s Proclamation of a State of Emergency (“Proclamation”) is attached to the staff report accompanying this Resolution and incorporated by reference.

B. The Governor found that conditions of extreme peril to persons and property exist due to the Event and that the Event is likely to cause conditions beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single local government.

C. The Proclamation recognizes the need to act before severe storms arrive, including by pre-positioning personnel, equipment, supplies, and other resources and expediting work to reduce the risks of flooding, landslides, mud and debris flows, and related impacts.

D. Based on the Proclamation and the record before it, the City Council finds that the Event presents risks to persons, property, City infrastructure, and essential public services within the City and declares a local emergency.

E. The City may need to undertake immediate work to prepare for, prevent, mitigate, respond to, or recover from the impacts of the Event.

To the extent delay resulting from competitive bidding for such work would imperil life, health, property, or essential public services, emergency contracting may be necessary.

F. Pursuant to Public Contract Code § 20168, the City Council finds, by a four-fifths vote, that public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health, or property because of the emergency resulting from the Event.

G. In accordance with Public Contract Code §§ 20168 and 22050, the

Page 163 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
City may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by the emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts, subject to the requirements of those sections.

H. The Event requires advance preparation to reduce the potential impacts of severe weather within the City, including potential flooding, erosion, mud and debris flows, infrastructure damage, power outages, and disruption of essential public services.

I. This Resolution and its findings are based on the entirety of the record considered by the City Council at its October 7, 2026 meeting including, without limitation, the factual references identified in this Resolution, the staff report accompanying this Resolution, the Proclamation, and the entire administrative record regarding the Event.

SECTION 2: Environmental Assessment. This Resolution and the actions anticipated by this Resolution were reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., “CEQA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000, et seq., the “CEQA Guidelines”). Based on that review, the Resolution and the actions authorized by the Resolution are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines § 15269(c) to the extent they constitute specific actions necessary to prevent or mitigate an emergency.

SECTION 3: Local Emergency; Emergency Authority. Subject to the limitations set forth in this Resolution and considering the emergency described above, the City Council takes the following actions:

A. The City Council declares a local emergency resulting from the Event.

B. Subject to the limitations in this Resolution, the City Manager, as the Director of Emergency Services, is authorized to exercise the emergency powers conferred upon the Director of Emergency Services by local and state law as necessary to protect life and property.

C. Pursuant to Public Contract Code §§ 20168 and 22050, the City Council delegates to the City Manager the authority to order emergency action necessary to prepare for, prevent, mitigate, respond to, or recover from the impacts of the Event, including directly negotiating, awarding, and executing contracts and procuring necessary equipment, services, and supplies without competitive bidding, to the extent authorized by Public Contract Code §§ 20168 and 22050 and applicable City law.

Page 164 of 208 ends

Staff Report
October 7, 2026
D. The City Manager is authorized to take all steps necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare and property including, without limitation, awarding and executing contracts in accordance with PCC § 22050; MPMC Chapters 2.52 and 3.100; and MPMC §§

3.20.050(1) and 3.90.040.

E. The Public Works Director is authorized to approve change orders and use contingency in a cumulative amount not to exceed 15% of the original contract amount for contracts awarded under the emergency authority provided by this Resolution.

F. The City Manager and City Attorney, or their respective designees, are directed to request from the California Office of Emergency Services (“CalOES”) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) technical expertise, resources, and financial assistance.

SECTION 4: Reporting and Review. Government Code § 8630 requires that the City Council review a local emergency at least once every 60 days and terminate the local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant. The City Manager is directed to report to the City Council within this time frame regarding the status of the emergency. To the extent the City undertakes emergency contracting pursuant to Public Contract Code § 22050, the City Council will review the emergency action and make the findings required by Public Contract Code § 22050 until the emergency action is terminated.

SECTION 5: Preservation. This resolution does not affect any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred before, or preclude prosecution and imposition of penalties for any violation occurring before, this Resolution’s effective date. Any such amended part will remain in full force and effect for sustaining action or prosecuting violations occurring before the effective date of this Resolution.

SECTION 6: Severability. If any part of this Resolution or its application is deemed invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the City Council intends that such invalidity will not affect the effectiveness of the remaining provisions or applications and, to this end, the provisions of this Resolution are severable.

SECTION 7: Reliance On Record. Each and every one of the findings and determinations in this Resolution are based on the competent and substantial evidence, both oral and written, contained in the entire record relating to the project. The findings and determinations constitute the independent findings and determinations of the City Council in all respects and are fully and completely supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole.

SECTION 8: Limitations. The City Council’s analysis and evaluation of the project is based on the best information currently available. It is inevitable that in

Page 165 of 208 ends

Monterey Park City CouncilOctober 7, 2026

Monterey Park City Council
October 7, 2026