Agenda packet, second session — 1 - Town Council, February 25, 2026 (part 1 of 2)

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2026
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
Brian Dolan, Vice Mayor
Lisa Maglio, Councilmember
Graham Thiel, Councilmember
Steve Woehleke, Councilmember
Scott Mitnick, Town Manager
Katie Bruner, Admin. Services Director
Sonia Urzua, Planning Director
Vacant, Town Clerk
Denise Bazzano, Assistant Town Attorney
Jon King, Police Chief
Nate Levine, Interim Public Works Director
Mackenzie Brady, Parks & Recreation Director
Executive Team
Town of Moraga Mission Statement
The Town of Moraga is dedicated to preserving our semi-rural character, conserving open spaces, providing exceptional municipal services, fostering safety and resiliency, providing opportunities for development, and creating a vibrant, innovative, and sustainable community for all.

AGENDA ACCESS: The meeting agenda is posted on the following notice board locations: 329 Rheem Blvd.; Moraga Library located at 1500 St. Marys Rd.; The Hacienda located at 2100 Donald Drive; and Online at:
https://www.moraga.ca.us/AgendaCenter
VIEWING OPTIONS: The Moraga Town Council meeting is scheduled to take place on the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month. The meeting may be attended in person at 335 Rheem Blvd, Moraga, on Community Access Television (CATV) Comcast Channel 26; or by viewing the Town's YouTube Live channel at: https://www.youtube.com/@TownofMoraga335
PUBLIC INPUT: To provide input to the Town Council please submit comments via the following email address: [email protected] up to two hours prior to the start of the meeting. Written comment cards will also be available for submission at the meeting. Individuals addressing the Town Council are requested to state their name and community of residence for the record. If further assistance is needed, please email the Town Clerk at [email protected] or call (925) 888-7021.

It is the policy of the Town of Moraga that Councilmembers, Town employees and meeting participants are to be treated with respect and dignity. Actual or perceived discrimination and/or harassment of a Councilmember, Town employee or others on the basis of age, ancestry, color, disability, gender identity, marital status, medical condition, national origin, race, religious creed, sex or sexual orientation will not be tolerated.

CEQA STATEMENT: Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(C), 15061(B)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.

NOTICE: If you challenge a Town's zoning, planning, or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Town Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judging review of any Town administrative decision may be had only if petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environment determination may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of final decision. The Town of Moraga will provide special assistance for disabled citizens upon at least 72 hours advance notice to the Town Manager's office (925- 888-7021). If sign assistance is needed or written material printed in a larger font or taped, advance notice is necessary. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.

February 25, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
1 TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2026
5:30 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PRESENTATIONS

3.A Proclamation - Spring Festival/Lunar New Year Celebration - February 2026

3.B EBMUD Projects in Moraga - Presentation by Joe Voelker

4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
4A. Addendum to Published Agenda: Public Communications received prior to 3:30 pm on February 25, 2026

5. ADOPTION OF MEETING AGENDA

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

6.1 Approval of Minutes for the February 11, 2026 Regular Meeting of the Moraga Town Council

6.2 Waive the second reading and adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 2.12, “Planning Commission” and Chapter 2.16, “Parks and Recreation Commission” to Revise Terms of Office and Reappointment Processes to be Consistent with the Town’s Interview and Appointment Policy.

TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBER
335 RHEEM BOULEVARD

MORAGA, CA

ROLL CALL
Time reserved for those in the audience who wish to address the Town Council on items which are not on the agenda. The Council cannot discuss details or vote on items not on the agenda. Your concerns may be referred to the Town Manager for a brief comment or for further review. Note: Public input pertaining to a specific item on the agenda may be made during consideration of that item.

A. Consideration of Consent Items Removed for Discussion B. Acceptance of Consent Items
February 25, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
2 6.3 Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter of support for California State Senate Bill 959, which seeks to ensure that public school districts will receive “Average Daily Attendance” funding when a local fire agency makes the decision to close a school during a fire incident, imminent safety hazard or extreme fire danger.

7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS ON ACTIVITIES

8. PUBLIC HEARING

9. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
9A Appoint Members to the following Committee and Commission positions:

Art in Public Spaces Committee (two positions with three-year terms) Parks & Recreation Commission (three positions with two-year terms) Planning Commission (three positions with two-year terms) 9B Receive an update on the revised Livable Moraga Road Project concept and authorize staff to commence community outreach to obtain additional public input. 9C Adopt a resolution authorizing and approving a First Amendment to Agreement for Town Attorney Services between the Town of Moraga and Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP; and authorizing the Town Mayor to execute the First Amendment.

10. COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

11. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

12. TOWN MANAGER FOLLOW-UP AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

13. ADJOURNMENT
A. Councilmember Reports on AB1234 Activities, Councilmember Announcements B. Town Manager
February 25, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
3 PRESENTATION- 3.A

A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING
Spring Festival/Lunar New Year Celebration
February 2026
WHEREAS, archaeological evidence from oracle bones inscribed with astronomical records indicates that the Chinese calendar existed as early as the 14th century B.C.E. during the Shang Dynasty and was historically reset in accordance with the reign of each emperor; and
WHEREAS, the traditional Lunar New Year, commonly known as the Spring Festival in China, Tết in Vietnam, Seollal in Korea, and Losar in Tibet, is determined by a lunisolar calendar that follows both the moon’s orbit around the Earth and the Earth’s 365-day orbit around the sun, occurring on the second new moon after the winter solstice and maintained through the addition of a thirteenth month approximately once every three years; and WHEREAS, Lunar New Year celebrations traditionally begin on Lunar New Year’s Eve and conclude on the 16th day of the first lunar month, known as the Lantern Festival, with the public holiday in 2026 beginning on Chinese New Year’s Eve, February 17; and WHEREAS, while Lunar New Year is celebrated uniquely across many Asian countries and cultures, it is universally a time centered on family reunions, gatherings, reflection, renewal, and the strengthening of communal and familial bonds; and WHEREAS, the Chinese calendar includes the Chinese zodiac, or Sheng Xiao (生肖), a repeating twelve-year cycle of animal signs, each associated with distinctive characteristics and attributes; and
WHEREAS, the Spring Festival marks the transition from one zodiac animal to the next, with February 16, 2026 concluding the Year of the Snake and February 17, 2026 ushering in the Year of the Horse; and
WHEREAS, in Chinese culture, the horse symbolizes energy, vitality, charm, and a spirit of adventure.

NOW, THEREFORE, we the Town Council of the Town of Moraga hereby proclaims February 17, 2026 as the beginning of the Spring Festival/Lunar New Year and encourages all residents to join in the 16-day celebration of the Year of the Horse in the Town of Moraga. _________________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
Town of Moraga
4 TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
February 25, 2026
Addendum(s) to Published Agenda
4: Public Communication
Update Includes:
• Public Communications received as of 3:30 before the Meeting. 5 6

!"#$
%&& "#&
'#&() *"#$"&& "#&*+,-.
/
0,#
121321314
51637
89
:&
% ,
':&" ,);,$-$+"$+*.
< $,

:&
% ,
$&=
9 ;> ,*
(

9,$-$

:&
%&"#?
@
A
B
$,
: +
@
$;
:,##&-

, *A "(B
, C *
$

:&
(
9,$-$
"&*#= ,
#**#&-
$
% ,#(#"$
(
D "-&##&
(,
EFG
HIJKLM
NIOOGJPKIO?
$
";;&#BQ#& -,$ =
A,-,$;
* ,R#&-
& ,=#R ,- &
$=*
#&

S$;,#&=$
$, $+
EFG
HIJKLM

NIOOGJPKIO
A,R#= *
*,", =
A,-,$;;#&-
("* =
&
#( Q*#*
= R A; &?
;AB; &
, $=#& **?
$= ,*#A
-,:?
$&=
; $&#&-(
";;&#B
&-$- ; &+
,
; ;> ,*
A$,#"#A$
#&
"$
R& ,
AA,&## *?
R &*?
$&=
>*#& **
A$,& ,*#A*
,-

, -#&?
"&,#>#&-
A*##R B

"#R#"
$&=
*"#$
#(
(
9,$-$
$&=
*,,&=#&-
";;&## *+
@&
, "-&##&
(
T#*;
T:$, & **
U
T"" A$&"
9&?
,
; ;> ,*
$R
*$, =
:
; $&#&-(
#
:=
>

, " #R
(,;$
$"&: =-; &
(,;

:&+
9$&B
$
-, $
A,#=
#&
> #&-
$"#R ?
"&,#>#&-
; ;> ,*
(
#,
";;&#B?
$&=
$R#&-
$
" ,#(#"$
B
"=
A,=B
=#*A$B
#&
#,
"$**,;
*A$"
:=
>
= AB
$((#,;#&-+
V
, *A "(B
, C *
"&*#= ,$#&
(,
A$" ; &
&
$&
A";#&-

:&
%&"#
; #&-
$- &=$
(,
A, * &$#&
(
$
% ,#(#"$
(
D "-&##&+
W :
#*
$
=,$(
, "-&##&
*$ ; &
(,
B,
, R# :+
V
$,
$AAB

;=#(B

$&-$-

$#-&
:#

:&X*
(,;$
,
A, ( , &" *+
<,$(
% ,#(#"$
(
D "-&##&

:&
(
9,$-$
% ,#(#"$
(
D "-&##&
8, * & =

!"#$
%&& "#&
@&
, "-&##&
(
B,
= =#"$#&

*AA,#&-
& ,=#R ,- &
$=*
,-
#&"*#R
A,-,$;;#&-?
#( Q*#*
= R A; &?
;AB; &
, $=#& **?
$&=
; $&#&-(
";;&#B
&-$- ; &
:##&

9,$-$
";;&#B+
Y,
";;#; &

(* ,#&-
#&= A &= &" ?
$= ,*#A?
$&=
$"#R
A$,#"#A$#&
*, &- &*

#&"*#R
($>,#"
(
9,$-$
$&=
, ( "*

:&X*
R$ *
(
> &-#&-?
AA,&#B?
$&=
"#R#"
&-$- ; &+
7

!"
!"!#!

"
"!

#!$
%
"&!"

!!"!!'

'

!"!
!

"!
(!
$

&

"!
!

"!$
)

'
*+,-.+/-00-+1234565
785 5
9:9;!

<"
'=

""'<>9?@?9
A9B@CDBEFD@G9
HHHIJKLMNOPQRONSSLOJPNSMINTU
VWXYZ[\]^_`_abcdefg\WfXc[d_XWh[YYfda_[Yi[\]
8

!"#$

%&!
'!()*+
,%$+- .
/"01021030456728/
9:$/,",$#(+,",$)+&
*
%$
%(-

;<"
!&#<"$!&)+&
*
%$
%(-
4

$
+!"(=73/>?
@A2%B CD@A0%B CDE
$!F2%B CDE
$!F7%B CD@A7%B CD:$&!!":
0304G30G02
74%72%3H8/%B"*D
IJKLMKJNOJPQR
STUVOTWXYNZTNNYO[N\Y]Z^O_ZVOPJXUYYNJO`TaSTUZVNZbNZ^OMSLYacYPNbVXXdLYeVYaNN\TNdZV LYT[UdXYNNYLJONZN\YLYPZL[[VLJO`ZcYOPZUUYONaM
STU^LJNJO`NZPTXXdZVLTNNYONJZONZKTdZLIJXXJafLYPYONaZPJTXUY[JTPZUUYONaZOgYhN[ZZLTO[ iTPYWZZQR^\YLY\JacLZbJXYcLZUJOYONXdJ[YONJbJYa\JUTajKZLT`TKTdZLkMIJaPZUUYONalaZUY TaN\YZLJ`JOTXTVN\ZLZbTN\LYT[TO[ZN\YLaTaLYcXJYamTLYYhNLYUYXdJOTccLZcLJTNYM nVaNZOYYhTUcXYZb\JaTWVaYJaN\Yop\dPTOfN^Y\TqYOJPYN\JO`aocZaNZOgYhN[ZZLR\YaJO`XYm \TO[Y[XdJOaVXNaYqYLdYhJaNJO`TO[qTXVY[WVaJOYaa^YTXLYT[d\TqYJONZ^OWdaJUcXdTaQJO`N\TN eVYaNJZOMr[[JNJZOTXXdR^\YOLYaJ[YONaYhcLYaa[JbbYLJO`ZcJOJZOaZL[JaT`LYY^JN\\Ja P\TLTPNYLJsTNJZOaZbWVaJOYaaZ^OYLaRXTO[Z^OYLaZLZN\YLLYaJ[YONaR\Y[JaUJaaYaN\YUTa \daNYLJPTXZLNLJ``YLY[RWYXJNNXYaN\YU^JN\jdZV[ZdZVRkTO[N\YOYaPTXTNYabVLN\YL^JN\ VOYeVJqZPTXXd[YbTUTNZLdPZUUYONaMIJa^ZL[aTLYbTLWYdZO[cZXJNY[YWTNYRYacYPJTXXdbZLN\Y JO[JqJ[VTXP\TL`Y[NZXYT[ZVLPZUUVOJNdMIJaNZOYTO[[YUYTOZLTLY\ZaNJXYRWYXJNNXJO`RTO[ TLLZ`TONM
S[ZOZNYhcYPNdZVNZNTQYUd^ZL[ZON\JaMSTNNTP\N\YiTPYWZZQTO[gYhN[ZZLcZaNaTO[ PZUUYONabZLdZVLLYqJY^M
IYLYJaTOYhTUcXYZbZOYZbKTdZLIJXXJatJOaVXNJO`PZUUYONaNZUYTaTOYhTUcXYu 9

!"#$%$&!&'(#!")$"*$+ ,-.(&#+/%*.$ $.0!&**)/*)! $,/)%0/) /-"$1 $&
"*$2!&'1!
)$"!#$& 3
4567897:;8:5<=>7<65?@>AA:5<>5BCDE6F>GHIJJI776I?K

L M

M

M

N O

P M

HIJJI7I7G:R:GGI5S<>A:65?A6TI5S1!.#(,."$++-" !/&">5=89JI@7>@I6JA:?I6R>G8A7U VW6G6@<:GIXI5SAF=6G<I@I=65>5B:Y<?>>G65?Z6@:9>>T[\W:G:46A6G:S8J6G=6G<I@I=65<]67 ^=8G78I5S_WIAI76@>A=J:<:R69GI@65UV>5<I58I5SWI76987I`:65??:R6A6<>GFJ65S86S:I5 65><W:G@>AA:5<W:@6JJ7A:^@J:6GJFW:6<:?D_:A>56JJFa?:G:S8J6<:?Da65?6987I`:U

!"!"
#$,% !/&/,+
)+ $)&#! &$$#" /" /*!%%$#! $.03
b5?DG:7I?:5<76G:5><I@I5SU4<I75><c87<A:RI5?I5S>RR:57:<>WI7J65S86S:Ud567:=6G6<:BC =>7<D65><W:GG:7I?:5<6J7>\67>RR:5?:?UH:G:I7>5::Y6A=J:K

M

e

M

M

e

46J7>5><:<W6<<W:E6F>G:?I<:?6<J:67<>5:>RWI7=>7<7<>9::`:5A>G:I578J<I5S\WI@W ?:A>57<G6<:7WI7?I7G:7=:@<R>GG:7I?:5<765?=G>=:G<F>\5:G7I75i<A:G:JFAI77=:6TjI<i7 I5<:556JD65?85=G>`>T:?U[7::6<<6@W:?klmn]U
o>I5<W:7IY\::T77I5@:WI7RIG7<@>85@IJA::<I5S67E6F>GDW:W67I578J<:?K pUqW:A>7<?:@>G6<:?=89JI@7:G`65<I5E>G6S6i7WI7<>GF[bJC:776F:G] rUqW:J6GS:7<=GI`6<:J65?>\5:GI5<>\5[\W><W:<>\5\65<7<>:5@>8G6S:<>?>A>G:] sUo:`:G6J987I5:77>\5:G765?G:7I?:5<7>R<W:<>\5
qWI79:W6`I>G?>:75><G:RJ:@<<W:?:@>G8A65??IS5I<F:Y=:@<:?>R6<>\5>RRI@I6JU t)$"*$+ ,-..0)$u-$" *-v.!+*/./'0/&$w$)0*. ,/)%&#!&#!w!#-.*/" 1 $)$
$
"
#$,%$#%$("1$.." *-v.!+
/1&x/-&+!.%$$ !&'3

$*$/*.$/,y/)'"
/-.#&/
10

11 12

!"# $%" &% !"#%'(')'% *+",
-."/ 010210304 5637 89
8:;' $))"+ &<:;''))"+()=%>%*'%* ,
? @ABC @CADE F@AF GCBCDAH ICJIHC KAL MC KANOPQ RJKKCPFG JIIJGOPQ PCS @JTGOPQ APE RJKKCDROAH ECBCHJIKCPFU ? AK IDJBOEOPQ A RJTPFCDIJOPFU

VL @TGMAPE APE ? MJTQ@F JTD @JTGC OP VJDAQA OP WXXYU ZC DAOGCE JTD NOEG @CDC APE ADC PJF DCAEL FJ EJSPGO[CU \@CDC ADC KAPL @JTGCG OP FJSP ECGOQPCE ]JD ^_` ICDGJP ]AKOHOCG F@AF ADC MCOPQ JRRTIOCE ML JPHL JPC JD FSJ AETHFG S@JGC NOEG @ABC QDJSP TI APE KJBCE JPU

ZC PCCE PCS @JTGOPQ AF AHH IDORC IJOPFG FJ MDOPQ OP LJTPQ ]AKOHOCG APE NCCI JTD GR@JJH EOGFDORF CPDJHHKCPF TIU aHGJ PCS @JKCG J] BADOJTG GO[CG SOHH @CHI VJDAQA AFFDARF APE DCFAOP CKIHJLCCG OP JTD \JSPb cR@JJH dOGFDORFb ]ODC EOGFDORFb @OQ@ GR@JJH EOGFDORF APE cF VADLeG fJHHCQCU aEEOFOJPAHHLb OF SOHH IDJBOEC AHFCDPAFOBCG ]JD CKIFL PCGFCDG DCAEL FJ EJSPGO[CU

\TDPOPQ FJ RJKKCDROAH ECBCHJIKCPFg

? SJTHE PJF GTIIJDF TGOPQ TPECBCHJICE HAPE FJ MTOHE APL PCS RJKKCDROAH MTOHEOPQGb MTF ?eE HONC FJ GCC TIQDAEOPQ SOF@OP F@C ]JJFIDOPFG J] JTD FSJ G@JIIOPQ RCPFCDGU

aG@HCL fJAFCG
hXiY jAGCJ kDAPECb VJDAQA
XY`_Y^l_^ih^
13 14

!"#
$" %&"#'()"*+),

-.
/0/10/2/3
4514
6-

78".
!".
$9&".')8"("*+"*:,;
<8"=")
>=
$(= ')8"("*+"*:,;
? 88#
@:
$=:')8"("*+"*:,;
A:"
-"(
$)"(')8"("*+"*:,;
B+
-.+
$:).+')8"("*+"*:,;
B C
D =
$:E = ')8"("*+"*:,;
>E.

F 8
$E.+ 8')8"("*+"*:,
! "8
-"#8
".&
- )9 8:
G
=
>E.

F.+H
I
")
C 8#
.+8"( &

:
=
E.
%88J
+.)+
& C %) .*

:
"
G")#
8":.(
=8
#.(
+=&8 .
.
-8"("
K"( :
4H
3H
".&
LMH
E
+=:
=:
+)).#
G8
:
."8"
9 "#H
:"G #H
".&
:)"NE.

G *

=
:")
) H
E
:
8 ) .&:
% ."
G8
-8"("

+..
CC.(
.
".

C .
)8
"N .+)%"::.(
+)).#O.
="
E
+".
9 %8&
G
.
.#
G8
:
+="8"+ 8H
9
":
G8
:
:+"H
+8"H
&..(H
8 "H
".&
=:.(
GG 8.(:*
-8"("
".&
(8 " 8
A")8.&"
E&
(8 "#
9 . G
G8)
P%".& &
GG 8.(:
="
: 8C
8 :& .:
"+8::
( . 8".:
".&
.+)
C :*
QP%".&.(
=(=G#
.
= :
"8 ":

E&
:8 .(= .
&"#
G
G8
G") :

8:

E=
":
= %.(
.:8
.(N 8)
+.)+
C"#
".&
.+:C#*
I
"%%8 +"
#8
+ "8
G+:
.
"GG8&"9#H
R"#
G
G H
".&
C 8"
+)).#
C98".+#*
>=(=GH
E N%".. &
& C %) .
+".
:8 .(= .
8
+"
+.)#
E=
%8 : 8C.(
E="
)" :
=:
E.
:% +"*
>=".
#
G8
#8
"& 8:=%
.
)C.(
=:
)%8".
E8
G8E"8&*
B.+ 8 #H

!"#
-8"("
S :& .
15 16

!"
#$%& '

("
#$%& )*&
+$&, -"./.0/.1.234..56
7 8"9":"%""'#;"%"")&
*+$+#,<=
#6*
'&*
)&
*+$+#,<>

?
'@A )&
*+$+#,<B"

CD

#'%

#)&
*+$+#,<E
%&-%
"'*%
")&
*+$+#,<-;
F"
'; $"
)&
*+$+#,<8$6

$'#&

$)&
*+$+#,
?"
6"&@"
#(%"-; F $
G

#
"#
A" (6
*#
$".1HI A;
%%
""C *$%
A
" GJ&9"
CK"#"A#""%";
(
CK

L
*"$ &
$A"9"K&" +
6C(&
C&9"A%"
"(
%"K" #K$"#G*A#$%#G A#" #"($&&
C+-%" "%
*
6
*%#@"" &
##
*
#%*%(A

*G
"
G AAA

%#
*K
#%#"
9"
&
K"*" "

# A
$&""9"#+
8& C
&"#G;"%9"M(M; (&
C A(

" A#9
#
AN"#

%&"9"#G*
9"

$(A; ; A%"
A; $&&"
$
#K$"#;
%& C9$ $
"#+JO#"&@

##
*
#%&"; "
A
"#
A" +

AA

CGJ&%K"(%#K"$
"
;
@"K
A$"
*K6
*#%
K$"#

;
&
"(9
@"
*%+
J;AKK
"$
"%"$
"A($# A"9"K
*
#K"$
; #%%"&"

"#&""%"
""A#(
#
"#
A" #+
8 $"
"CG

D

#
17 18

!"#
$#%"
&'()*+,"!-."/%'')0(.(12
3 4)!
565765859
:;87
<
=>0'
?)(
&0'/)(,#("1"./".@2
19

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1
(

(
3

44 5"
-

6!75"
20

!"
#$"# %
&$'"#()'* +
,-
./.0/.1.2
.34.
56 789:
;%
!9:)%&'%"$"()"( *
<"%
6%"$"
89:
;%
8"'3 8=":

>%
?%
=#:$

-(
8=#
#
":
'"#
#:
@@%
>

%
"-% =#@

>

=
@%#-
>"$
#:

A:(
B
#
#'@%":

%
>"'#

":-
=
:"$%
#:
'

#>(
,=:
=

-%#?
=%$=
C"'%#:-"

$

;"'@#:-
=#$=
)=
":-

=
>"'##

=%
D@% #:$
@@%
>%
CEF8G

=H
#
=@
='
>
"
:
>

:$#:$
=%H
?:
"
%"#$=
: (
8=":

(

''
>
"
;"'@#:-
":-
F:

IJJK
LMKMN
"

%
(%$
21 22

!"!#!$

%&'!(') *+,-
./.0/.1.2

34.5 67
8
(
9''-

$ ((''-
%'&!(!
)
:-
9;
<
7&=
7;

>
?
'

-&#

- ;
@<;--!
?
A

-B$-

$$
<
#-
C(
(;

>
-(
'(
>-C-$'-

A
#-
';
#

$
#
&
<!

7;
<';
>-

('-

7&
<

C-;
<
-

D'
;
>

E!
7;F

-C-

G=

$-
>
&
'
-;
#--

-;

>C-!
?

$-(<(;
A

(

#-
7&

7&
I>!

>
7&
J;

A-

-C-
-B$-
A#

-
#--
-(
-
A-

>
->
;
#-
&#

>
<
&

&
&-!

?
>
F
--C-
#--

-->
<
'-
$#;
(
>-C-$'-
=

"

--

-
<
#-
(-

$$--
!
J-
#C-
#->

<
-
-$-
-

;
&

-
$

-A

-

#-
C

' -
<
-'$;

>

=

;

-
(->!

J#-
?

>-

>
#
#

$C-
$$-;

#
&
;
A

<
7&

'
;
@<;--
-
>-

-C-
#

<
C

&
>-

#-
$-(-$

>;
&
A
!
?
A>
C-

--
#-
(;
A
<
-
-$-
-

-
$
$$K$

-
=
-C-

=

(C->

(--
'-
-

('-

7&!
,#

;=

23 24

!"#$
%#!&$&
'$!()*+#,-.#/"$$(0!.!12
3 4(,
565765859
:;59
%<
=>0$
?(!
'0$/(!+@!#1#./#.&2
25

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1
*
#

+
2

"3"$

-

5!6!5
26

!"#
$%&
'(&)

*
+,+-,+.+/
001-2
34 567

8
!9#8$&
%
'(
'9):
;9

4 %
!&
%$&
%
'(
'9):

!"*

$&
%
'(
'9):
=>
?9
!89$&
%
'(
'9):
@
8 &
A8
!%8$&
%
'(
'9):

B
!#
($&
%
'(
'9):
6(
4
(
!9&
($&
%
'(
'9)
CDEF
GEHIF
JKLLKM
ENO

PDPQDFM
IR
STD
GIFEUE
VIWN
XIYNZKL[
\
WEM
MI
]LDEMDO
SI
MDD
STD
SIWN
ZTIIMD
SI
RIZYM
IN

DZINIPKZ
OD^DLI]PDNS_
`LL
IR
aEPIFKNOE
NDDOM
PIFD
I]SKINM
RIF
OKNKNU[
MTI]]KNU[
ENO
TIYMKNU_
\bP
ULEO
SI
MDD
HIY
EFD
LEMDF

RIZYMDO
IN
ERRIFOEQKLKSH[
cYELKSH[
IR
LKRD
ENO

ZIPPYNKSH
^KQFENZH_

JEO
STDMD
QDDN
]FKIFKSKdDO
KN
STD
]EMS[
PH
REPKLH
PKUTS
TE^D

LIZESDO
KN
GIFEUE[
EM
KSM

YNODNKEQLD
ZTEFP
KM

ZDFSEKNLH
ESSFEZSK^D_

eYFSTDFPIFD[
ENH
RYSYFD

DZINIPKZ
OD^DLI]PDNS
WKLL
LKfDLH
QFKNU
PH

OKMZFDSKINEFH

OILLEFM
SI
GIFEUE
EM
\
IRSDN
STKNf
EQIYS
SFHKNU
SI
M]DNO
PIFD

LIZELLH
KN
IYF
aEPIFKNOE
ZIPPYNKSH_
gKNZDFDLH[

hFKEN
ijklmjn

aEREHDSSD

FDMKODNS
27 28

!"#$
%&$'
()*&$'+"#&,#')-)./ 0#&

1.&#-&)#''12"-"3
4 51
67687696:
;9<;8
=>
?52'
1"
(2')1"+."&3&-)&-$/
29

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

*

*

.
)
///*

(#0123
%

0!415
30

!"#$%
&%'
( !'#$%)*+,-'./!0 .1
2%
)3)43)*)5
+67+
82 9
:;
&<
(=><-.#/'/0 /0=1?
@!=/
2/'!
(./'!-.#/'/0 /0=1?
A#!/%
B/%
(C$/%-.#/'/0 /0=1?
D##E
F!!=
(<!!=-.#/'/0 /0=1?
"#/</.

G<!
('<!-.#/'/0 /0=1?
G>%

#
(>% #-.#/'/0 /0=1?
:
2!%!
(=.!%! -.#/'/0 /0=1
B/#
2/E#
F!!=
/%$
2.C#=
H
<
G>%

% !I
J
>/%$

=</#
.E
=KK#
H#
<
G>%L=
HH#=

.;
H#>/#$
>!<
<'<H
%.!
$;K.%
!%
2#/'/0
2E
<=C/%$
'#>
K
<#I
/%$
'<#
>
/#
#/!=!%'
#
H#
<!$#%
!%
<!=
..%!EI
/%'=!$
.#
</%
)*
M%$$
H/.!E
..C#=
><
/=
/
2#/'/
<.0
G<#'<
#
!%;;.%
!%
#
/
= <=I
<# 0
A /=
H
<!=I
J
#E
/#
/C
<
%'N#.
</%0
J
C!;
</
<'<HI
>NK/%%$
$;K.%
/%
#/
.#
> .!%'
=K/ =
H#
H/.!!=I
=#%'<%
#
=%=
H
..%!EI
/%$
%</%
O/!E
H
!H
H#
#=!$%=
H
/
/'=0
G</%
E
H#
E#
/$#=<!K
/%$
H#
<
/#
E
/#
K!%'
!%
=</K!%'
2#/'/L=
H#0
:!% #EI

!!/
/%$
"#$%
&%'
P
D%$/

!#
2#/'/

Q
RS775
:%
H#.
.E
!8<%
31 32

!"#
$%

&'
()*

%)+
!,
-
.

/0/10/2/3
/456
78 9.'

$' %

&:
)!)+%)+#,
.
'":

:);
% %

<
=
):
)
!

:

>)*);

#
(

'
"
)
>[email protected]
%"
(+
B

!
)
C
#)

#
)

")
E
C

;

F
!#
"

>):

()
:
) #
)

*):
;+

=
'(
F

);
)DD

%
)
(+
."

)
#
!
*
"

*)!
:)
#
H

(#
*

)%%
D
(<
")C

)
#
#

*
F
!
!
) (
*

##
)

)
(+
7
)#

*;
"

*)!
(

!
D

(

: "

#"'
")
;
%)

)F
"

%::
;I
.")
;<

!"#
J
(K*

%)L
M (

'''+'
()*

%)+
!
33 34

!"#
$ #% &'
(
)*)+*),)-
./.!
01 2(3

3 "#
4 $
$%

5 #
34

66
7

4

68
7
4
9
84
68
#$
5 #

8
7
8
:
;
#

8
<3

=>(?@A

8

#6$
5

)

8:

8
3
68

7
#

1
4 $
1 4

8
3##4

BC0

D

9

8
5 3

#6
7

68
7
4
9
E
5F

6 7

8
64
68

;

#
8
#
7
68

;

6
7

##
$
(

#6

#

66:
6

4
66
3

877
G6
74
$
H
8
3 #

:

8

88

;
8

8

7
;

68
#

9

8
1
4 8
$
5
#

#
7
#7
;
7
#

=>(?@
8:

3 #

1
4 :
3

8
I
J

4K
68
#

8

#

7

=>(?@
##

##;

1
4 $
(

35 36

!"#$%"&
'()"&&!
*&%"#+,!-./!(0&&"1%/%23
4 5"
67687696:
;6<6:
='
>51&
"%
*1&("%,?%!2!/(!/@3
37

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1

2

3

45!!$
%

4!674,5558
38

!"#
$%&
'#!%()*&+,-&."##%/!-!01
2 3%+
454654748
49:8
;<
=>/#
?%!
'/#.%!*@!&0&-.&-A1
39

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1
2 *

334

5!$
#

6!557
40

!"
#!$"%
&"'!()*$+,-$./""!0'-'12
3 4!
565765859
:;<<
=>
?40"
@!'
&0".!'*A'$1$-.$-%2
41

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

.*
/
.*

0

12

3!445
42

!"#
$%&'()*#+
,+"%-./#!01#(&++%2"1"34
5 6%
787987:7;
;<==
>?
@62+
A%"
,2+(%"/*"#3#1(#1'4
43

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

.

/

.

/

012

34!

1!5 !
44

!"#
$!%&
'#& ()*!+,-!."## /&-&%0
1 2
343543637
7896
:;
<2/#
= &
'/#. &*$&!%!-.!->0
45

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1

2

34567(89:-$
*

4!6;
46

!"
#$"%"%&$'
(%'$)*+!,-.!/"%%$0'.'&1
2 3$
454654748
94:;7
<=
>30%
?$'
(0%/$'+@'!&!./!.A1
47

!"#

&

'

(

)

*
+

(

&,

-

.

/0 1
2
3 .

4

51
((6*(#7897
%(:5(1

;!877
48

! "

#
!$%
!
#&
' () *+*,+*-*. /012 3

4 )56 7 "56& $
!%!#&!#8'
9:
!
! ;!

6<! 8
<6 = 5
=
> =8?!6< !6< 5 >6% <!%= 8#
@ ! 5

6% 8AA B>
6% = A
< B!% !6>5= !6< !6>

!6>6 5<

#
8 ! A 86!
6 B B <
: 8B CA 88
6 !6<
6&8
6# 95 &<
!6>6 8!> 6 =!D E!8: < 6 % !%!
68 B>
6% =
8 B!%
6 &

6
>#
)=!6 >
49 50

!""#
$%&&"!
'(&%)*+",-."#/((%0&.&12
3 4%
565765859
:;<7
=>
?40(
@%&
'0(#%&+A&"1".#".!2
51

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./

0"(

1.2!
%

3!424
52

!"#$
%!&!'(
)*+#,(-!'./!01**#2+/+34
5 6#
787987:7;
<:=<>
?%
@62*
A#+
)2*0#+-"+!3!/0!/$4
53

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

/

0120 $
*

3!452
54

!"#
$%#&
'#%()*+,-./,0"##(1%/%&2
3 $(
454654748
9:;9
<=
>$1#
?(%
'1#0(%+@%,&,/0,/!2
55

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1
2
+ 345

2

$
6

7!889
56

!"#
$%
&!"#'$%!(()*!$(+),- .*!
$,!*+!)*%%$/0+01
2 3$
454654748
9:4;
<=
>3/%
?$0
&/%)$0',0!1!+)!+(-
57

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

.

.

.

.

/

01!0*
2

3!0 !
58

!
"#

$ %&
"'%( )
*#
+,+-,+.+/
012+
3*
4 56#
78
!6#'8$%8& &"'&"(
9 *8& &
'#'

:
;<=
&8#
>&
>
?
@

A
8&

#
>
?8

A&

#
??8
A
>
BCD5E;F
%&

@
#
>
& #&

#
&
%
#

#
*&8'>"
;
&%
68
#

>&8
8#
??8

#
A&=8
A
>

AA8"
*8& &

&
6#
%

A&%

A
?8

'&
>%
&#
>&
?&'
8
6
?&#

@

A8
%&#

&8

'%G
&#
8
A&%

#'
%%@8
A
>

=8

A8H#

I>8J
'%%#

"
*8& &

@
8
>&#
6>

=
&#
*8& &

&
6#
A
??
6>%
;
@
=
=86>%
#

??8
&#
8?'
&"
;
6
@
>&8#

>&8
>&
8
6#
&8>
?
6
%@8&'
>
BDC5E;F
'%%#

6 >
>

?@
'

#
A
??8
&#

#'
#"

;
&??8'
&

8
8#
'#
8&
#
A8
>

%&8"
5>&#

LM+
7&
B&
*&
59 60

!"#$"%
&'()

*+*,+*-*.
/0,,
12 3
)4

54 "
!#$#%6
7
2!

"! "
!#$#%6
8 9
:9

;
9 "
!#$#%6

<
=

4 "
!#$#%6
>
4"
?4

!4 "
!#$#%6
?59
@

59$
"
!#$#%6
$
29$

"9$ "
!#$#%
ABCD
ECFGD
CHI

EBJKBDL
GM
NOB
PGQH

RGSHTUVW
EF

OSLKCHI
CHI
X
CDB
YBDF

BHTGSDCZBI
NG
LBB
NOB
NGQH
[DUGDUNU\UHZ

BTGHGJUT
IBYBVG[JBHN]
EGDCZC

CHI
GSD

KDGCIBD
^CJGDUHIC
CDBC
QGSVI

KBHBMUN
MDGJ

CIIUNUGHCV

IUHUHZW

DBNCUVW
CHI

OGSLUHZ
G[NUGHL

NOCN
LBDYB

DBLUIBHNL
CTDGLL

ZBHBDCNUGHL
CHI
UHTGJB
VBYBVL]
X
CJ
B_TUNBI
NG
OBCD
CKGSN
NOB
[DGL[BTNL
GM

JGDB
ZDGQNO
TGJUHZ
NG
GSD
NGQH]
`CJUVUBL
IUHBW

TBVBKDCNB

KUDNOICF
[CDNUBLW
LOG[W
BNT]

GSNLUIB
GM
GSD

NGQH

KBTCSLB
GM
NOB

VUJUNBI
G[NUGHL
QB
OCYB
OBDB]
^BNaL
[VBCLB
bBB[
NOGLB
MSHIL
UH
EGDCZC
KF
ZUYUHZ

MGVbL
[VCTBL
NG
IG
NOGLB
NOUHZL
cded]
X
C[[DBTUCNB
NOCN
FGS
[VCH
NG
MGTSL
GH

CMMGDICKUVUNFW
fSCVUNF
GM
VUMBW
CHI

GYBDCVV

TGJJSHUNF
YUKDCHTF]

POGSZONMSVW
QBVVg[VCHHBI
IBYBVG[JBHN
TCH

LNDBHZNOBH
GSD
VGTCV

BTGHGJF
QOUVB
[DBLBDYUHZ
QOCN

JCbBL
NOUL
NGQH
L[BTUCV]
POCHb
FGS
MGD
FGSD
VBCIBDLOU[
UH
JGYUHZ
NOUL
UJ[GDNCHN
QGDb
MGDQCDI]
XH
NCVbUHZ
NG
MBVVGQ
EGDCZC

TGJJSHUNF

JBJKBDLW
NOB
LS[[GDN
MGD
NOBLB

TOCHZBL
QUVV
KB
ZDBCN]
^GGbUHZ

MGDQCDI
NG

OBCDUHZ
JGDB
CL
NOUHZL
[DGZDBLL]
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
bCNUBIL[DGSViZJCUV]TGJ

jkl
mnopqlrst
uvlpmnwl
lrql
xq
yrplyzm
{y|lwtj
61 62

!"
#$%&'
(%")*'+$&,-$.!%%)/"-"01
2 #)&
343543637
89::
;<
=>/%
?)"
(/%.)"+@"$0$-.$-A1
63

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1
2
-

+

3

4 5
6

6

(
7$(
6

(

4!5!4
64

!"#$%&
'()&* +
,

-.--.-/-0
1/23#
45 6
,
7 8
9

:;
9

$&<
%
()
(:*=
':

5 %'
&
%'$&<
%
()
(:*=
<'

$&<
%
()
(:*=
@
<<A
B'':
9'':$&<
%
()
(:*=
C<
9 &
D9'

%9'
$&<
%
()
(:*=
D;

E
<
;
)
<$&<
%
()
(:*=
,)
5'
')
:&'
')$&<
%
()
(:*
FGHI
JHKLI
HMN

JGOPGIQ
LR
STG
ULVM
WLXMYZ[\
]G
VGIG
G^YZSGN
SL
[GHIM
LR
STG
SLVM_Q
`[HMQ
RLI

GYLMLOZY
NGaG[L`OGMSb
`HISZYX[HI[K
STG
`[HMQ
RLI
HNNZSZLMH[
NZMZMc\
IGSHZ[\
HMN
TLXQZMc
L`SZLMQ
ZM
JLIHcH
HMN
dHOLIZMNHe
UTLXcTSRX[\
VG[[b`[HMMGN
NGaG[L`OGMS
YHM
QSIGMcSTGM
LXI
[LYH[

GYLMLOK
VTZ[G
`IGQGIaZMc
VTHS
OHfGQ
STZQ
SLVM
Q`GYZH[e
UTHMf
KLX
RLI
KLXI
[GHNGIQTZ`
ZM
OLaZMc
STZQ
ZO`LISHMS
VLIf
RLIVHINe
gZMYGIG[K\
dGMH
hIHcZMQfK
HMN
gSHM
hGIGiTHMQfZK

jkj
lGIMVLLN
FIZaG\
JLIHcH

m<&
&A
'49

65 66

# $%&'()* +
,

-.-/.-0-1
1234
56 7
,89
:

!89(
#)&'('"*
5
"

;&
%9
=9
'

)

98
%;
%
9
"
9 )<
"
%9
")

8<
;
(9"%
%9'
,
9
<>
?

@A30
="

B%C

DEFG
HI
JGK
GHLMN2

# $%&'()
67 68

!"#$
%!&!'(($
)("$*+,!-./!0#(($1"/"23
4 5$
67687696:
;;<6=
>
?51(
%$"
)1(0$",@"!2!/0!/&3
69

!"#

%

&

'

(

)

%*

+

,-

.

/01/
)

2!341
70

!
"#
$ %&

'(')('*'+
,-..
/
01
23

43
!"#"
$5
6

!
!"#"
$5
7
8

9:
!"#"
$5
;
<

!"#"
$5
=3

!3
!"#"
$5
>4
?

4#
!"#"
$5
0#
#

#
!"#"
$
8
;
:

9

@
3
>4
?#A
BC

3
>4
D#!

!

D3

#
#
1;"
!
:
3
9:
6 :
#

;
4:
9@
@

4:
!
@

A

3D
A
:
3
!
D

3
:

@
@

A

A
:
;!

:

"
B
DD#
;
#

9#!
@@:9;A
19;A
:
!E

;
33"
23
#@
D!
:
#

;
DA
4
:1D

#
3#

#
#
;
43

!
3
#3#
3

4:@
D#

1"
>3
;
@
;
#:
:
3D
:
3!3@

4:
3D
@

4C

@"
>3
;A

71 72

!
"#$#%
&'%#()*!+,-!./''#0%-%12
3 4#
565765859
9:89
;<
=40'
>#%
&0'.#%*?%!1!-.!-@2
73

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1
#
2

34445

462(

%

6!733,8"98
74

!"#$
%&'#
()*+,-.!/$0!1#))+2*0*34
5 6+/
787987:7;
7<=7
>?
@A2)
B+*
(2)1+*.C*!3!01!0&4
75

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

./ 0
1
2 +

3

4"45$$

6!778
76

!
"#$%&'
('%$)*+,-./,0#''$1%/%23
4 5$
67687696:
;<=:
>?
@51'
A$%
(1'0$%+B%,2,/0,/&3
77

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

.#
.#
/

01(

2!331
78

!"!#
$%
&'"%()*!+,-!./''%0"-"12
3 4'
565765859
::;79
<4
=>0'
?%"
&0'.%"*@"!1!-.!-A2
79

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

*
$

.

/0//

$

1!23
80

!
"#$ %
&' ( #$ %)'*+*', -.$
/0/10/2/3
3452
67 8.9:
;$
&9:*$ )' (+*+%,
<=
7 :>:(?

@
%$:
!>%
$'>
$ >$
!>%
':!+

@
%%'$
!$
$*>A>$:%
$*$>B$=
>C
#
:>*$=
@
=>=
:
>:*=$
D
%
9:$=

=
%+
' ( #$ %)'*+*'
E$(>:

F 9 =$=
'$%%($4
GHIJK

!
"#$ %
&' ( #$ %)'*+*', LMNOPQRK

STTHPQUVRUIW
VWX
YHUXP
ZIWR[
\P]MP^R
_VRPK
`$#
55C
/2/3

a41b
67 cIK
d%9$!$$)' (+*+%d
&%9$!$$)' (+*+%,C
d'(>)' (+*+%d
&'(>)' (+*+%,C
d!>>%)' (+*+%d
&!>>%)' (+*+%,C
d#=:)' (+*+%d
&#=:)' (+*+%,C
d(!>$)' (+*+%d
&(!>$)' (+*+%,
<=
7 :>:(C
`> %
F
C
%

:$ D
e2
D$
$%>=$:
F
!$
.9:
9$
*
f'$C
7 (C
@
9:

!:
$*!
F
D
F
D
%$ B>*$+

@
:9
D
9

'$

.9:
#$$
>%
F$:
:
$*(:>g$=C
A$%$
:9
!
'D
!%#:=C

F'>D
:=
@
$
B$ D
( $F
F
D
=$=>*>:+
@
%
9:

%
D

A$%$
!:(
!$
h<E.ij
k >=$
`(
= >:(
k >=$
7:!C
l:$C
/2/3+

m%A$*>D
>:
>(!
F
9!
9%
:::*$=
:%A> $=

:$9
n>:
7:'$:
!>%
9$$C

A*$
'D
!%#:=
:=
@
B>%>$=
!>%
A%
%''$ C
%
*
*'':>>$%
9$
:$$=

$
%:=%
F
`> :$%%
:=
hB$
F
+
.!:
D+

k$%$
F$$
F $$

*:*
'$
9>!
:D
o$%>:%

* >F>*>:
:$$=$=+

!
"#$ %
3/
<D9=
k*$
7 (C
;6
81
82

!"#
$!!%"&
'#()*+,%-./%0!##)1(/(23
4 5#
67687696:
;;<=9
>5
?@1#
A)(
'1#0)(,"(%2%/0%/&3
83

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

$-
$-

.!
))
/

.01

2

314

5!00.
84

!"
#"$%"!
&'!()*+"%,-"./''(0!-!12
3 4(%
565765859
5:5;
<=
> 0'
?(!
&0'.(!+$!"1"-."-@2
85

!"#

&

'

(

)

*

(

&+

,

-

/

01$

2!003
86 CONSENT 6.1 – Draft Meeting Minutes
___________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 1 February 11, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

REGULAR MEETING

TOWN COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2026

MINUTES
5:30 PM
The following are minutes of the actions taken by the Town of Moraga Town Council. A full video recording of the meeting is available on the Town's website at:
https://livestream.com/moraga

TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBER
335 RHEEM BOULEVARD

MORAGA, CA

1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM by Mayor, Kerry Hillis.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Mayor Kerry Hillis, Vice Mayor Brian Dolan Councilmembers Steve Woehleke, Lisa Maglio, Graham Thiel Councilmembers Absent: None
Staff Present: Town Manager, Scott Mitnick; Assistant.Town Attorney, Denise Bazzano; Planning Director, Sonia Urzua; Police
Chief, Jon King; Dierdre Castillo, Senior Engineer

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PRESENTATIONS
3A. Proclamation - February 2026 as Black History Month Councilmembers read the Proclamation aloud.

4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
Public comments were made by: Graig Crossley, Lisa Disbrow, Wendell Baker, Sheri Sweeney, Mike McCluer, Michael Gaffney, Ron Schumacker, and Dave Bruzzone.

5. ADOPTION OF MEETING AGENDA
ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Maglio
Adoption of the meeting agenda as presented.

Vote: (5-0)
87 CONSENT 6.1 – Draft Meeting Minutes
___________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 2 February 11, 2026
There were no public comments.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Dolan
Approved Consent Calendar items 6.1 and 6.4 as written
Vote: (5-0)
Councilmember Woehleke pulled Consent Calendar item 6.3 for discussion.

Mayor Hillis pulled Consent Calendar item 6.2 for discussion.

There were no public comments.

A. Consideration of Consent Items Removed for Discussion B. Acceptance of Consent Items

6.1 Approval of Minutes for the January 28, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Moraga Town Council.

6.2 Adopt a Resolution:

1. Approving the Augusta Drive Storm Drain Repairs Project (CIP 25-401) as complete by FJ&I, Engineering Inc. (San Pablo, CA); and

2. Authorizing the Town Manager to execute the Certificate of Completion; and

3. Authorizing the Town Engineer to file the Resolution of Acceptance and Certificate of Completion with the Contra Costa County Recorder.

Senior Engineer, Deirdre Castillo, and Town Attorney, Denise Bazzano, provided clarifying comments and answered Councilmember questions.

ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Thiel
Vote: (5-0)

6.3 1. Adopt a Resolution Ratifying Moraga-Orinda Fire District Ordinance 26-01 (Fire Code) and Ordinance 26-02 (Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Code), Adopting the 2025 Editions of the California Fire Code and California WildlandUrban Interface Code, and the 2024 Edition of the International Fire Code by Reference with Certain Local Amendments, and Adopting Findings of Fact to Support the Local Amendments

2. Find the ordinance exempt from review pursuant to sections 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(5) of the California Environmental Quality Act Planning Director, Sonia Urzua, introduced the item. MOFD Deputy Fire Chief Lucas Lambert and Fire Marshall Casey Irving provided clarifying comments and answered Councilmember questions.
88 CONSENT 6.1 – Draft Meeting Minutes
___________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 3 February 11, 2026
There were no public comments.

ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Maglio
Vote: (5-0)

6.4 Receive Accounts Payable Claims for January 1, 2026 through January 31, 2026 ($574,377.06)

7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS ON ACTIVITIES
A. Councilmember Reports on AB1234 Activities, Councilmember Announcements Councilmember Woehleke, along with Planning Director Urzua, attended the January 29th Contra Costa County Point in Time Survey for the Homeless.

Councilmember Maglio, along with Vice Mayor Dolan, attended a Leadership in Political Science class at Saint Mary’s College.

Councilmember Thiel, as Liaison for the Art in Public Spaces Committee, promoted the February 14th Chalk a Haiku event at the Moraga Library.

Vice Mayor Dolan attended two transportation-related groups: Lamorinda Program Management Committee and Lamorinda Fee & Financing Authority.

Mayor Hillis attended the Micro-Mobility Transportation for Moraga meeting on February 2nd; Contra Costa Mayors Conference in City of Richmond on February 5th; met with Bird regarding electric bikes and scooters; attended County Connection Operating and Scheduling Committee meeting on February 6th; attended East Bay Wildfire Safety Working Group; was guest speaker at Lamorinda Democratic Club’s Open House on Feb 7th; recorded interview for podcast Capstone Conversations on February 11th.

B. Town Manager Mitnick – no reports.

8. PUBLIC HEARING
None.

9. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

9.A Consider Waiving the First Reading and Introducing an Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.12, “Planning Commission” and Chapter 2.16, “Parks and Recreation Commission” to Revise Terms of Office and Reappointment Processes to be Consistent with the Town’s Interview and Appointment Policy. 89 CONSENT 6.1 – Draft Meeting Minutes
___________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 4 February 11, 2026
Assistant Town Attorney Denise Bazzano presented the item and provided clarifying comments to Councilmembers’ questions.

ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Maglio
ROLL CALL Vote: (5-0)

10. COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Councilmember Woehleke moved to request a special meeting of Council at a practical date focused on team organization, to celebrate strengths and identify means and plans to address challenges.

ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Hillis
Vote: (5-0)
Councilmember Thiel requested a staff report to discuss the raising of the Pride flag on Town-owned property.

ACTION:

Motion: Thiel / Second: Hillis
Vote: (5-0)

11. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
None.

12. TOWN MANAGER FOLLOW-UP AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
Dierdre Castillo was commended for her work for the Town as Acting Public Works Director. Confirmed staff will follow up on providing recognition to outgoing Town Commissioners, Board members and Committee Members. Also confirmed that staff will resolve the Firewise signage issue. Provided clarity on the RV storage issue.

Provided answers to clarifying questions from Councilmembers Thiel and Dolan.

Reminder that February 16 is Presidents Day holiday. The next meeting of Council will be February 17 for committees and commission interviews. The next regular Council meeting will be February 25.

13. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hillis adjourned the Town Council Regular Meeting at 7:14 pm. 90 CONSENT 6.1 – Draft Meeting Minutes
___________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 5 February 11, 2026
Respectfully submitted by:
__________________________________
Melisa Melcher
Acting Deputy Town Clerk
Approved by the Town Council:
__________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
91 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.2
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Denise Bazzano, Assistant Town Attorney
Subject: Adoption of Ordinance Amending Chapter 2.12, “Planning Commission” and Chapter 2.16, “Parks and Recreation Commission” to Revise Terms of Office and Reappointment Processes to be Consistent with the Town’s Interview and Appointment Policy.

Meeting Date: February 25, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Waive the second reading and adopt an ordinance amending Chapter 2.12, “Planning Commission” and Chapter 2.16, “Parks and Recreation Commission” to Revise Terms of Office and Reappointment Processes to be Consistent with the Town’s Interview and Appointment Policy.

BACKGROUND
The Town of Moraga has several Boards, Committees and Commissions that serve the Town in a variety of capacities. From time to time, members of these bodies may vacate their seat which results in an unscheduled vacancy or their term may come to an end and they do not seek re-appointment. On November 12, 2025, the Town Council adopted by minute order, an Interview and Appointment Policy for Town Boards, Committees, and Commission (“Appointment Policy”). The Appointment Policy provides, among other things, a specific process for the recruitment, interview of candidates and selection of candidates to fill vacant Board, Committee and Commission seats.

On February 17, 2026, the Town Council considered the proposed ordinance and after deliberations, introduced the ordinance. There were some questions from the Council regarding terms of committee and commission members during the discussion but ultimately, the ordinance was introduced as proposed by staff.

DISCUSSION
The proposed ordinance would revise sections 2.12.030, “Term of Office” and 2.12.040, “Removal or Vacancy” within Chapter 2.12, “Planning Commission”; and sections 2.16.030, 92 “Term of Office” and 2.16.040, “Removal or Vacancy” within Chapter 2.16, “Park and Recreation Commission” to make changes to be consistent with the Appointment Policy.

Those changes would specify that the term of office of each member is two years and that each member serves two-year terms based upon the date and year of appointment and will serve until the member’s term ends or until a successor is appointed and qualified. The current term for a Planning Commission member and a Parks and Recreation Commission member is two years so the actual term length remains the same. The changes would also provide that members may be appointed to a maximum of three consecutive terms unless the council determines that continued service of a member is in the best interest of the Town.

The proposed Ordinance also removes references to start dates of terms, which are no longer relevant.

Staff is now recommending that the proposed ordinance be adopted by the Town Council. If the Council adopts the ordinance, its provisions will go into effect thirty days after adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with this agenda item.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
The proposed ordinance is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.), because it constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Provide alternate direction to staff to amend the proposed ordinance, which would require re-introduction, or

2. Do not adopt the ordinance.

NEXT STEPS
If Town Council adopts the ordinance, the ordinance will take effect in 30 days, on March 27, 2026.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Ordinance Amending Chapters 2.12 and 2.16 to Revise Terms of Office.pdf Attachment B - Redlines to Chapters 2.12 and 2.16.pdf
Attachment C - Interview and Appointment Policy.pdf
93 Attachment A
4929-9414-4912 v1
ORDINANCE NO. 320

AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MORAGA
AMENDING CHAPTERS 2.12, “PLANNING COMMISSION” AND CHAPTER 2.16, “PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION” TO REVISE TERMS OF OFFICE AND REAPPOINTMENT PROCESSES CONSISTENT WITH THE TOWN’S INTERVIEW

AND APPOINTMENT POLICY
WHEREAS, the Town of Moraga has various Boards, Committees, and Commissions, and vacancies occasionally occur when members resign or do not seek reappointment at the end of their terms. To ensure consistency, the Town Council directed staff to develop a policy standardizing the interview and appointment process for filling those vacancies; and
WHEREAS, on November 12, 2025, the Town Council adopted by minute order, an Interview and Appointment Policy for Town Boards, Committees, and Commission (“Appointment Policy”); and
WHEREAS, the Town Council desires to update the Town of Moraga Municipal Code to revise provisions in the Municipal Code to be consistent with the Appointment Policy.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:

SECTION ONE
Findings: The above recitals are incorporated herein as if set forth herein in full and each is relied upon independently by the Town Council for its adoption of this Ordinance.

SECTION TWO -AMENDMENT.

Sections 2.12.030, “Term of Office” and 2.12.040, “Removal or Vacancy” within Chapter

2.12, “Planning Commission” of Title 2, “Administration and Personnel, shall be amended by repealing and replacing those Sections in their entirety to read as follows:
“2.12.030 - Term of office.

The term of office of each member is two years. Each member shall serve two-year terms based upon the date and year of appointment and shall serve until the member’s term ends or until a successor is appointed and qualified.

Members may be appointed to a maximum of three consecutive terms unless the council determines that continued service of a member is in the best interest of the Town. If that determination is made by the council, the member may re-apply and reinterview for their position in the same manner as a new board, commission and committee member.
94 Ordinance No. 320

Page 2 of 3 ends

4929-9414-4912 v1

2.12.040 - Removal or vacancy.

A member of the commission may be removed by a majority vote of the council. A vacancy shall be filled in accordance with the Town’s Board, Committee and Commission Interview and Appointment Policy, as may be amended from time to time.

A person appointed to fill a vacancy serves for the remainder of the unexpired term.” All other sections within Chapter 2.12 shall remain unchanged.

SECTION THREE -AMENDMENT.

Sections 2.16.030, “Term of Office” and 2.16.040, “Removal or Vacancy” within Chapter

2.16, “Park and Recreation Commission” of Title 2, “Administration and Personnel, shall be amended by repealing and replacing those Sections in their entirety to read as follows:
“2.16.030 - Term of office.

2.16.040 - Removal or vacancy.

A member of the commission may be removed by a majority vote of the council. A vacancy is filled in the same manner as the original appointment. A vacancy shall be filled in accordance with the Town’s Board, Committee and Commission Interview and Appointment Policy, as may be amended from time to time. A person appointed to fill a vacancy serves for the remainder of the unexpired term.” All other sections within Chapter 2.16 shall remain unchanged.

SECTION FOUR
The Town Council hereby determines that this Ordinance is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment. 95 Ordinance No. 320

Page 3 of 3 ends

4929-9414-4912 v1

SECTION FIVE
Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase in this Ordinance or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The Town Council hereby declares that it would have passed each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, or invalid, or ineffective.

SECTION SIX
Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 30 days from its passage, and shall be published in accordance with the law, in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the Town of Moraga.

SECTION SEVEN
Publication. The Town Clerk is directed to cause this Ordinance to be published in the manner required by law.

THIS ORDINANCE was introduced with the first reading waived at the Town of Moraga Town Council meeting on the 11th day of February, 2026, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Moraga Town Council on the 25th day of February 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
____________________________ __________________________ Town Clerk Kerry Hillis, Mayor
Dated:___________________
96 Attachment B
4906-2042-6125 v1

2.12.030 - Term of office.

The term of office of each member is two years. Each member servesshall serve twoyear terms based upon the date and year of appointment and shall serve until October 1st of the year in which the member'smember’s term expires. Each member servesends or until a successor is appointed and qualified.

Members may be appointed to a maximum of three comsecutiveconsecutive terms unless the council determines that continued service of a member is in the best interest of the commission or the townTown. If that determination is made by the council, the member may re-apply and re-interview for their position in the same manner as a new board, commission and committee member.

2.12.040 - Removal or vacancy.

A member of the commission may be removed by a majority vote of the council. A vacancy isshall be filled in accordance with the same mannerTown’s Board, Committee and Commission Interview and Appointment Policy, as the original appointment.may be amended from time to time. A person appointed to fill a vacancy serves for the remainder of the unexpired term.

2.16.030 - Term of office.

The term of office of each member is two years. The term of office of each member begins January 1, 1978. OfEach member shall serve two-year terms based upon the members first appointed, fourdate and year of appointment and shall serve until January 1, 1979, and three serve until January 1, 1980. Each member serves until February 1st of the year the member'smember’s term ends or until a successor is appointed and qualified.

Members may be appointed to a maximum of three consecutive terms unless the council determines that continued service of a member is in the best interest of the commission or town.Town. If that determination is made by the council, the member may re-apply and re-interview for their position in the same manner as a new board, commission and committee member.

2.16.040 - Removal or vacancy.

Formatted: @Normal
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, Bold
Formatted: @Normal
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial
97 Attachment C
1 Board, Committee and Commission Interview and Appointment Policy Purpose
Establish a process for the interview and appointment of all Boards, Committees and Commissions by the Moraga Town Council.

Appointment Details
A. The Maddy Act (see Chapter 11, Section 54970 et seq. of the California Government Code) sets forth certain legal requirements for board, commission and committee member appointments. It shall be the responsibility of the Town Clerk to carry out the requirements of the Maddy Act to ensure that appointments or re-appointments are made in a timely matter.

B. The Town Clerk shall maintain a current roster of all Boards, Committees and Commissions whose members serve at the pleasure of the Town Council and the necessary qualifications for each position.

C. Unless otherwise provided in the Moraga Municipal Code or specified by the Town Council, all Boards, Committees and Commissions shall serve two-year terms expiring based upon the date and year of appointment.

Re-Appointments
A. Board, Committee and Commission members may be appointed to a maximum of three consecutive terms unless the Council determines that continued service of a member is in the best interest of the Town. If that determination is made, the Board, Committee and Commission member may re-apply and re-interview for their position in the same manner as a new board, commission and committee member.

B. Removal or non-reappointment will be determined by Council.

Vacancies
A. When a vacancy occurs due to resignation, termination, expiration, or other causes, the Town Clerk or staff liaison will advertise a notice inviting applications for the vacancy on the Town’s website and via any other appropriate channels at the discretion of the Town Clerk with a deadline date based upon timing of the interview schedule.

B. Applicants must fill out and submit an application form. Applications are public documents and are kept in accordance with the Town’s Record Retention policy.

C. All applications received will be submitted to the Town Council for consideration . 98 Attachment A
2 Interviews
A. Interviews will typically be conducted of all qualified applicants, unless otherwise decided by Town Council.

B. If a candidate is unable to attend the interview at the designated time, the Town Council, in its discretion, may re-schedule the interview or may proceed with selection of a qualified candidate without an interview.

C. The Town Clerk will coordinate a Special meeting to hold the interviews, for the applicants. Prior to the special meeting, the Town Clerk will prepare and distribute to the Council a list of standard interview questions. These questions shall be used as a guide when interviewing each applicant. Councilmembers may deviate from the list of standard questions or ask follow-up questions.

D. Consistent with the Brown Act and applicable law, interviews shall be conducted by the Town Council at public special meetings scheduled and reserved specifically for interviews. The Town Clerk shall inform applicants of this fact prior to their interview.

E. At the time of the interview, the Town Council may decide to re-advertise the vacancy or re-interview some or all of the applicants.

Appointments and Oath of Office
A. The Council shall appoint the selected candidate(s) for Board, Committee and Commission seats at a regular Council meeting. Appointments must be discussed and made in open session.

B. The Clerk shall administer the oath of office after the appointment of the selected candidate(s), which may take place anytime prior to their first meeting as a Board, Committee or Commission member.
99 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.3
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Scott Mitnick, Town Manager
Subject: Letter of Support for SB 959 (Grayson) – Public School Wildfire Safety Meeting Date: February 25, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter of support for California State Senate Bill 959, which seeks to ensure that public school districts will receive “Average Daily Attendance” funding when a local fire agency makes the decision to close a school during a fire incident, imminent safety hazard or extreme fire danger.

BACKGROUND
California State Education Code provides that a public school may cancel classes and receive “Average Daily Attendance” (ADA) funds if a major safety hazard is determined by the local law enforcement agency. However, at least one local Contra Costa County public school district has raised a concern that it may not receive ADA funding when only a local fire agency makes this determination. In other words, a concern has been raised that there may be a gap within the State Education Code which may leave public schools at risk of not receiving ADA funding when local public schools are closed as a result of a fire agency, versus a law enforcement agency, providing the order to evacuate and/or close a public school.

DISCUSSION
SB 959, as authored by State Senator Tim Grayson (D-09), seeks to address this potential gap in current State law by ensuring that local public-school districts will not lose ADA funding if a school closure is ordered by a local fire agency. The Town of Moraga has been asked to support this Bill. Attached is a sample letter of support to be sent to the appropriate members of the State Legislature.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact on the Town’s General Fund associated with this request. 100

CEQA COMPLIANCE
The approval of this letter of support is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is an administrative action and not a “project” that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Revise the proposed letter of support.

2. Do not authorize the Mayor to sign the proposed letter of support and provide direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
If approved, staff will ensure that the Mayor signs the necessary letter of support and that it is transmitted to the appropriate legislators in Sacramento.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - SB 959 Support Letter.pdf
101
Attachment A
_____________________________________________________________________________ 329 Rheem Boulevard  Moraga, CA 94556  (925) 888-7022  [email protected]  www.moraga.ca.us The Honorable Senator Tim Grayson February 26, 2026
1021 O Street, Suite 7250
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: SB 959 (Grayson) - School Wildfire Safety - SUPPORT Dear Senator Grayson,
On behalf of the Moraga Town Council, the purpose of this letter is to urge your support of SB 959, which would authorize local fire agencies to determine when a public school faces an imminent danger warranting the cancellation of classes. This bill would also clarify that public schools would not lose State of California “Average Daily Attendance” (ADA) funding when classes are canceled due to the imminence of a major safety hazard as determined by a local fire agency.

California has experienced an unprecedented rise in the frequency and severity of wildfires with the new reality of a year-round fire season. In response to recent devastating wildfires, the State Legislature has acted to rebuild affected communities and bolster mitigation efforts. However, more is needed to ensure that local communities have the necessary tools to respond to fire danger.

One area where there remains a gap is within the State Education Code, which lists fire as one of the emergency instances where a public school may cancel classes and not lose out on ADA funding. This statute, however, is not clear on whether public schools would lose out on this crucial funding if proactive action is taken to protect students and faculty through school closure out of prudent caution, due to imminent fire danger.

Current law provides that a public school may cancel classes and receive ADA funds if there is imminence of a major safety hazard as determined by the local law enforcement agency. However, in certain instances, local fire agencies may be equally suited to make these determinations. SB 959 will address this gap in current law and help assure that local public-school districts will not lose ADA funding if they err on the side of student and community safety in the face of an imminent wildfire.

It is for these reasons that the Moraga Town Council urges your support of SB 959. Should you have any questions, please contact Town Manager Scott Mitnick at [email protected] or (925) 888-7020.

Sincerely,
Kerry Hillis
Mayor
cc: Hon. Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (D-16)
League of California Cities
Moraga Town Council
MAYOR’S OFFICE
102
DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 9A
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Katie Bruner, Administrative Services Director
Subject: Appoint Members to the Moraga Art in Public Spaces Committee, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission
Meeting Date: February 25, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Appoint Members to the following Committee and Commission positions:

Art in Public Spaces Committee (two positions with three-year terms) Parks & Recreation Commission (three positions with two-year terms) Planning Commission (three positions with two-year terms)

BACKGROUND
The Town has upcoming open seats for the Art in Public Spaces Committee, Audit and Finance Committee, Local Sales Tax Oversight Committee, Parks and Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission. Nominations were solicited and the following responses were received:

Art in Public Spaces Committee – Two applications for two seats.

Parks and Recreation Commission – Four applications for three seats.

Planning Commission – Three applications for three seats.

The recruitment for openings on the Local Sales Tax Oversight Committee and Audit and Finance Committee will remain open to receive additional applications. 103

DISCUSSION
Per the Town's Board, Committee and Commission Interview and Appointment Policy, the Town Council conducted interviews of the candidates and reviewed and considered applications on February 17, 2026.

The following individuals were interviewed:

Candidate Committee/Commission Length of Term
Suzanne Darcy Art in Public Spaces 3 years
Teresa Onoda Art in Public Spaces 3 years
Michelle Barar Parks & Recreation 2 years
John Greenblatt Parks & Recreation 2 years
Scott Parker Parks & Recreation 2 years
Rob Pierson Parks & Recreation 2 years
Ben Helber Planning Commission 2 years
Dustin Moore Planning Commission 2 years
Nick Polsky Planning Commission 2 years
Staff will schedule interviews for openings on the Local Sales Tax Oversight Committee and Audit & Finance Committee at a later date.

At this time, Town Council is requested to appoint the Art in Public Space Committee, Parks & Recreation Commission, and Planning Commission for the terms identified above.

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no direct cost impacts associated with this agenda item.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
Appointing commission and committee members is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15000 et. seq.), including without limitation, Public Resources Code section 21065 and California Code of Regulations 15378 as this is not a "project" that may cause a direct, or reasonably foreseeable indirect, physical change in the environment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not appoint commissioners and/or committee members and keep the seats open.

2. Provide alternate direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
After Town Council makes its decisions, staff will inform the applicants of the outcome. Terms for the appointed commissioners and committee members will commence on March 1, 2026. 104
DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 9B
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Nate Levine, Interim Public Works Director/Town Engineer; Sonia Urzua, Planning Director
Subject: Livable Moraga Road – Project Update
Meeting Date: February 25, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Receive an update on the revised Livable Moraga Road Project concept and authorize staff to commence community outreach to obtain additional public input.

BACKGROUND
Project Location:

Livable Moraga Road (LMR) is a "Complete Streets" planning and design effort intended to improve public safety and vehicle flow, provide safe and continuous bicycle and pedestrian facilities, enhance the streetscape, and provide for other related public infrastructure improvements along approximately two miles of Moraga Road between Campolindo Drive and St. Mary’s Road. As illustrated in Attachment A, this corridor is divided into the following four segments:

Segment 1: Campolindo Drive to Rheem Boulevard
Segment 2: Rheem Boulevard to Donald Drive
Segment 3: Donald Drive to Corliss Drive
Segment 4: Corliss Drive to St. Mary’s Road
Project History:

This project has a long history dating back to over a decade ago. In early 2014, Town Council established resident advisory bodies to help evaluate corridor concepts and alternatives for this project. Ultimately, Segment 3 (Donald Drive to Corliss Drive) received the most focused 105
review because it raised a central question of whether and how to reallocate roadway width to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and comfort while maintaining acceptable vehicular operations.

In 2015, a community-wide mail survey regarding Segment 3 was conducted. On April 13, 2016, Town Council received the survey results and provided direction to staff on a preferred Segment 3 concept to be carried forward as part of the broader LMR corridor plan. At that meeting, the Town Council selected a preferred Segment 3 option (“Survey Option 1”).

On June 22, 2016, the item returned to the Town Council for consideration of the corridor - wide LMR concept and next steps (including further design and environmental work), and to confirm an implementable Segment 3 striping configuration aligned with resurfacing/striping timing. At that meeting, the Town Council revisited Segment 3 and considered a Councilproposed compromise (“Option 1A”) which would replace the center/turn lane with a second southbound travel lane.

Following discussion, a majority of the Town Council supported the modified approach (“Modified Option 1”) for Segment 3 and selected it as the preferred Segment 3 striping configuration (cross-section) to be implemented within the existing pavement width, in coordination with resurfacing/striping work. However, the overall long-term corridor configuration was not formally finalized. Please see Attachment B for the evolution of these cross-sections.

From June 2016 to June 2023, this project was put on hold.

On September 13, 2023, Town Council approved awarding a professional services agreement with Alta Planning + Design to complete the remaining concept-level tasks, including updated concept drawings and a planning-level construction cost estimate (not construction plans or construction). The 2023 reinitiation directed staff and the consultant to carry forward the 2016 corridor concepts while updating the concept exhibits and typical cross sections to reflect current complete- streets and safety design practices. During this effort, staff also pursued a supplemental traffic analysis to provide a current technical basis for evaluating a proposed lane repurposing option between Corliss Drive and Donald Drive (i.e., reducing travel through lanes from four to two, plus a center two-way left-turn lane within the existing pavement width).

For more detailed information on the project’s history, please refer to the following ink on the Town’s website: https://www.moraga.ca.us/193/Livable-Moraga-Road

DISCUSSION
As directed in 2023, updated concept exhibits and typical cross sections have been prepared to carry forward the previously endorsed corridor concepts while updating typical dimensions and features to reflect current Complete Streets and safety design practices. These drawings are conceptual and provide a holistic corridor vision that can be implemented through standalone projects or grants over time to achieve the corridor's overall objectives. They are not construction-ready plans, but establish the framework for future design and implementation.
106
Overall Update - Moraga Road Segments 1, 2, and 4
Alta Planning + Design reviewed the corridor segments selected in 2016 against current industry standards, best practices, and contemporary safety guidance. Minor refinements to travel lane widths, bicycle facility dimensions, shoulders, and buffer areas were incorporated in Segments 1, 2, and 4. These refinements do not materially alter what was advanced through prior Council review and are not the primary focus of the current discussion. Please see Attachment C for the recommended cross-sections.

Moraga Road Segment 3 Supplemental Traffic Analysis
In February 2024, a supplemental task order was issued to evaluate a proposed lane repurposing option between Corliss Drive and Donald Drive. The lane repurposing option would convert the existing four-lane section (two lanes in each direction) to two travel lanes (one in each direction) plus one center two-way left-turn lane (three total). The analysis reviewed existing (2024) and projected (2044) traffic volumes, intersection operations, vehicle speeds, crash history, and corridor functionality. Please see Attachment D for the complete Traffic Analysis.

Key findings from this analysis included the following:

Traffic Volumes:

Traffic volumes within the study area (~15,000–16,000 vehicles per day) fall within the range considered feasible for a three-lane configuration under the United States Federal Highways Administration (“FHWA”) guidance provisions.

Traffic Operations:

Based on the 2024 volumes, the proposed lane repurposing option will not significantly or materially affect intersection operations. Overall traffic “Level of Service” (LOS) remained comparable to existing conditions, with delay increases generally limited to a few seconds per vehicle. Under the 2044 projected scenario, the study intersections are expected to continue operating at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better). Vehicles will be able to travel comfortably up to the existing 35 MPH speed limit nearly 24 hours per day, including during peak travel times.

Vehicle Speed:

The reality of Moraga Road, based on empirical evidence, is that actual vehicle traffic on the existing four-lane section encounters only limited congestion and, at times, unsafe speeds over the posted speed limit. The standard technical measure of the 85th percentile in Moraga recorded speeds exceeding the posted 35 MPH by at least 7 to 9 MPH. This data reflects recurring excessive speeds and unsafe conditions, at times, for Moraga Road vehicles, cyclists, pedestrians, and those who live on or adjacent to Moraga Road.

National research, empirical evidence, and best traffic safety practices implemented throughout the State of California in communities similar to Moraga continue to demonstrate that converting an undivided four-lane roadway to a three-lane configuration results in obtaining operating speeds closer to the posted speed limit AND improving corridor safety for 107
vehicle drivers, cyclists, pedestrians, and adjacent residents.

Public Safety:

Between 2018 and 2023, nine known/reported injury crashes occurred within the study area, including crashes involving bicyclists and pedestrians. It is possible (likely) that the actual number of crashes is higher since not all accidents are reported and/or known by local public safety agencies. As noted above, and based on national research, existing high-level crashreduction factors, and empirical evidence throughout the State of California, the proposed lane repurposing option will likely reduce the number of accidents and significantly improve the overall public safety of this corridor.

Corliss Drive intersection:

The technical analysis, based on empirical data and public safety, indicates that a traffic signal at Corliss Drive is warranted under existing volumes. Installation of a traffic signal at this location will improve public safety and reduce delays for turning movements, particularly under the lane repurposing option.

Extension of the Lane North of Donald Drive:

The analysis concluded that extending lane repurposing north of Donald Drive toward Ascot Drive is not recommended due to operational impacts. Accordingly, the proposed evaluated lane repurposing option is limited to the Corliss–Donald segment, totaling ~2,400 feet (or 0.45 mile).

Emergency Evacuation:

The proposed improvements will make it easier for vehicle traffic to traverse through this portion of Moraga. It’s the consultant and staff’s professional option that the proposed recommendations will not reduce functional emergency evacuation capacity or impact the Town’s Evacuation Plan.

Summary Observations:

Overall, the traffic analysis concluded that the lane repurposing option between Corliss Drive and Donald Drive is operationally feasible under both existing (2024) and future (2044) conditions, and the consultant recommends moving forward with this option for this segment of Moraga Road. The analysis further concluded that the lane repurposing option is expected to improve corridor public safety by moderating vehicle travel speeds and improving left-turn operations (reducing conflicts and rear-end crash potential associated with turning movements), while also providing sufficient roadway space within the existing pavement width to accommodate the desired bicycle and pedestrian facilities in the long-term concept.

Community Engagement:

While the LMR concept has a long and extensive history of public engagement dating back to 2014, the updated Segment 3 traffic analysis and data have not yet been presented to the community as a complete package. The proposed changes to Moraga Road will be highly visible and will raise understandable questions about congestion, access, turning movements, 108
emergency response, day-to-day travel, and emergency evacuations.

Going forward, it is recommended that staff hold a series of community meetings over the next six to nine months with in-person and virtual options, as well as an online survey to collect resident and stakeholder feedback. This effort will require a careful and transparent approach to communicating the data and evidence, the anticipated public safety benefits, and how implementation would work in practice.

FISCAL IMPACT
The direct cost of the overall technical review and planning for this project is funded through a Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) grant administered by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), a developer contribution, and local Measure J funds; approximately $110,000 remains available to complete this component of the project. This amount will be sufficient for recommended targeted community outreach and creation of finalized conceptual plans.

The cost of the actual capital improvements will be determined at a future date, and only after direction is provided by Town Council.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
The recommended action is limited to receiving an informational update and providing direction to conduct community outreach and continue concept -level planning and technical analysis. These activities are categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 CCR § 15306 (Information Collection) and 14 CCR § 15262 (Feasibility and Planning Studies). Any future action to approve a specific project design and/or proceed to construction would be subject to separate CEQA review as appropriate.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Direct staff not to proceed with this project and return the remaining funds for this project to CCTA and the other applicable funding agencies.

2. Make revisions to the recommended approach and provide direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
If Town Council authorizes staff to proceed with community outreach meetings, staff will do the following:

Finalize the community outreach plan and materials based on the updated concept exhibits/cross sections and the latest traffic analysis.

Conduct targeted community outreach meetings over the next six to nine months (with in-person and virtual options).

Conduct an online survey of residents.

Return to Town Council in late 2026 with an outreach summary and a final recommended set of concept cross sections for Segment 3 and the corridor as a whole.

Following Town Council direction in late 2026, staff will proceed to develop a plan for the 109
overall project design, environmental review, funding options, and implementation.

Estimated dates of actual project construction are unknown and will be determined at a later date.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Livable Moraga Corridor Vicinity Map.pdf Attachment B - Evolution of Cross Sections.pdf
Attachment C - Recommended Cross Sections.pdf
Attachment D - Final Moraga Road Traffic Analysis Memo with Appendices.pdf 110
Attachment A
111
Attachment B
112
Cam
Ric
a
rd
o
To Rheem
Valley Estates
Camino
Ricardo
Via
Moraga
0 500 1,000
Feet I
Existing Features
Multi-Use Path
Crossing Beacon
School
Commercial Center
Parksand Open Space
Approved / Proposed
Development
£n Transit Stop
Class III Bike Route
Proposed Improvements
Sidewalk
Class II Bike Lane
Enhanced Bus Stop
Enhanced Crosswalk
£n
Crosswalk
Intersection Treatment
Segment Line
Multi-use Path
Crossing Beacon
Seg. 1
Seg. 1
Seg. 2
Seg. 2
Seg. 3
Seg. 3
Seg. 4
Seg. 4
Donald Dr
Moraga Rd
St. Mary’s Rd
Devin Dr
Natalie Dr
Park St
Lucas Dr
Buckingham Dr
Woodford Dr
Lynwood Pl
Hanson Ct
Chalda Wy
Campolindo Dr
Rheem Blvd
Rheem Blvd
Moraga Rd
Ascot Dr
Draeger Dr
Alta Mesa
Center
St
Corliss Dr
Campolindo
High
School
Rheem Valley
Shopping
Center
To Saint Mary’s
College
Moraga
Commons
Park
Hacienda
de las Flores
Moraga
Public Library
To Saint Mary’s
College
Lafayette/Moraga Regional Trail
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n £n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n
£n £n
Segment 1 Design Concept
Segment 2 Design Concept
Segment 4 Design Concept
Laguna
Creek
W E
Protected
bike lane Parking
Sidewalk
Travel
lane
Travel
lane
Bike
Lane
Turn
lane
Approx. 90’ ROW
Multi-use
path
'5 '5'3'5.01'5.01'5.01'8'3'6'5.1'01
73’
Ex. Back of Walk
Ex. Face of Curb
Ex. Edge of
Pavement
W E
’2 ’5
Bike
lane
10’
Multi-use
path
Sidewalk

10.5’
Approx. 84’ ROW
Travel
lane

10.5’
Travel
lane
5’ 8’
Bike
lane

10.5’
Travel
lane

10.5’
Travel
lane
10’
Turn lane/
median
Ex. Back of Walk
Ex. Face of Curb
Ex. Face of Curb
Ex. Back of Walk
82’
Approx. 50 - 60’ ROW
* Southbound left turn lane/median proposed along the parking lot frontage only.

E
Moraga
Road
Spur Trail
Multi-use
path
Laguna
Creek
Parking lot
10'
W
Travel
lane
Turn lane/
median*
Bike
lane
Bike
lane
5' 10.5' 10.5'
Travel
lane
6' '3 '5’5.01
Sidewalk

50.5’
Ex. Edge of
Pavement
Ex. Edge of
Pavement
Corridor Concept
Livable Moraga Road
Segment 3 Design Concept
Segment 3 Approved by Town Council 6/22/2016
Resolution 63-2016 Confirming Selection of Modified Option 1 as the Preferred Striping Configuraton for Segment 3 of the Livable Moraga Road Project PINCH
POINT

DRAINAGE ISSUE
MAY LIMIT PAVEMENT WIDENING

CONSTRAINED R/W,

UTILIZE EXISTING

MULTI-USE PATH FOR
PED + NORTH-BOUND
BIKES
SEGMENT 4

PREFERRED TYPICAL

NEAR TERM TYPICAL
SEGMENT 3

PREFERRED TYPICAL

NEAR TERM TYPICAL
SEGMENT 1

PREFERRED TYPICAL

NEAR TERM TYPICAL
SEGMENT 2

PREFERRED TYPICAL

NEAR TERM TYPICAL

SECTION SCALE
Attachment C
113
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 1
To: Nate Levine, PE; Brian Horn; Town of Moraga, CA
From: Matt Fralick, PE, PTOE; Scott Shepard, PE; Alta Planning + Design Date: July 26, 2024
Re: Livable Moraga Rd – Road Diet Feasibility and Benefit Summary Executive Summary
Introduction and Existing Conditions
In Feburary 2024, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority provided Alta Planning + Design (Alta) an additional task order to the existing Livable Moraga Road Project to perform a traffic analysis for the corridor of Moraga Road between Corliss Drive and Ascot Drive, particularly the segment between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr.

Currently, Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr is currently a four-lane, undivided road with a buffered bike lane and parking in the southbound direction, a standard bike lane northbound, and sidewalk on the west side.

The posted speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph), and the total roadway width of 70 ft as seen in Figure ES-1.

Figure ES-1. Existing cross section of Moraga Road from Corliss Dr to Donald Dr. Created using Streetmix (https://streetmix.net).

Between 2018 and 2023, there were nine crashes on the segment of Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Ascot Dr which resulted in injury, of which four occurred at the Corliss Dr intersection, and one occurred at the Donald Dr intersection. A total of four crashes, involved vulnerable road users (bicyclists, motorcyclists, and pedestrians). At the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr, there were two sideswipe crashes, one of which resulted in a serious injury to a bicyclist.

Road Diet Feasibility and Benefits
In order to solve existing safety issues, a road diet is recommended between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr, with the fourlane section converted to a three-lane section with a two-way left turn lane and buffered bike lanes in both directions, as seen in Figure ES-2.

Attachment D
114
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 2
Figure ES-2. Potential road diet cross section for Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr. Created using Streetmix.

The existing traffic volumes on Moraga Road would support a road diet per FHWA guidance, subject to further traffic analysis.

The existing vehicle speeds on Moraga Road indicate that between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr, less than one-fourth of drivers were obeying the posted speed limit, indicating a speeding problem. Based on the available evidence, this speeding could be reduced with the implementation of a road diet.

The existing safety issues along the corridor, both in terms of crashes and speeds, could be improved with a road diet.

Prior studies have shown that crashes could be reduced by up to 46% at intersections, and bicycle crashes reduced by up to 36% by improving the bike lane from a standard striped lane to a buffered bike lane.

A road diet would not significantly impact emergency response operations. In fact, emergency vehicles may have improved ability to maneuver due to the presence of the two-way left turn lane. In addition, the safety improvements may lead to fewer crashes for emergency response vehicles to repond to, allowing more efficient use of resources.

Traffic Analysis Results
The traffic analysis found that implementing a road diet with the May 2024 volumes did not significantly impact traffic operations. With changes to signal timing at Donald Dr, delay was in some instances reduced. In the future road diet condition (2044), all intersections are comfortably operating, with no intersections experiencing unstable or extremely congested operations.

A signal at the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr would be warranted based on 2024 traffic volumes. In the road diet configuration, the existing merging lane would be removed due the reduced cross section. A signal at Corliss Dr would improve safety by eliminating dangerous sideswipe crashes and reduce delay for vehicles turning off of Corliss Dr onto Moraga Road. The safety of the crosswalk which crosses Moraga Road would also be improved.

Safety Benefits
Safety benefits from the reduction in crashes indicated that a potential safety benefit of $106,027 per year (in 2024 dollars) would be generated from implementing the road diet.

Conclusions and Recommendations
The road diet configuration would represent a benefit to safety, both by reducing speeds of motor vehicles and by creating additional dedicated space for cyclists. Traffic flow and operations would not be significantly affected.

It is therefore recommended to move forward with the road diet configuration between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr.

115
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 3
Introduction
In Feburary 2024, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority provided Alta Planning + Design (Alta) an additional task order to the existing Livable Moraga Road Project to perform a traffic analysis for the corridor of Moraga Road between Corliss Drive and Ascot Drive in the Town of Moraga in Contra Costa County, California. Moraga Road traverses through the center of Moraga, connecting to the City of Lafayette to the north and the SR 24 freeway. The corridor is residential from Corliss Dr to Ascot Dr, transitioning to commercial areas north of and at the intersection of Ascot Dr. Several parks and schools border the corridor. With this in mind, the City tasked Alta with conducting a traffic analysis of a road diet to this segment of Moraga Road, which will include lane repurposing to include a buffered bike lane in the northbound direction.

Existing Conditions
Between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr, Moraga Road is a 4 lane undivided roadway, with the following characteristics:
• Posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour (mph).
• A 7.5 ft wide parking lane is provided on the west side (including the gutter). • Bike Lanes:
o A 7 ft wide buffered bike lane (5 ft bike lane + 2 ft buffer) is adjacent to parking southbound o A 5 ft wide standard bike lane northbound.
• Sidewalk:
o Provided on the west side of Moraga Road
o No sidewalk on the east side between Paseo Linares and Donald Dr. • There is a crosswalk across Moraga Road at Corliss Dr, which is scheduled for enhancements, including advance signage and a rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) as part of a Caltrans-funded safety project. • Bus stops in both directions just north of Corliss Dr, at Devin Dr, and just north of Ascot Dr.

The cross section between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr, approximately 70 ft wide, is represented graphically in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Existing cross section of Moraga Road from Corliss Dr to Donald Dr. Created using Streetmix (https://streetmix.net).

Road Diet Feasibility
The road diet cross section would convert a section of Moraga Road from a four-lane, undivided road to a three-lane cross section with a two-way center turn lane and a buffered bike lane in the northbound direction. This is represented graphically in Figure 2, which shows one potential configuration that includes a wider buffer and wider bike lanes in both directions. As with the existing conditions, the roadway width is approximately 70 ft. 116
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 4
Figure 2. Potential road diet cross section for Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr, incorporating 3-lane cross section with twoway left turn lane, wider bike lanes and buffers. Created using Streetmix (https://streetmix.net).

By repurposing the space, the aim is to improve safety and potentially operations. To determine whether the road diet will function, the first step is to determine the existing traffic counts, speeds, and crashes to determine if the road diet is the correct solution.

Traffic Volumes
Per FHWA, road diets are most effective on roads with an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of up to 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd). Other analysis might be needed for roads with ADT between 10,000 to 20,000 vpd, as seen in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Road Diet volumes and type of analysis needed to determine feasibility.

The traffic volumes were collected for the study area in May 2024. Table 1 shows traffic volumes along Moraga Road.

CROSS SECTION FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
117
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 5
Table 1. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts along Moraga Road.

Location ADT (vehicles per day)
Moraga Road between Paseo Linares and Draeger Dr* 15,030 vpd Moraga Road between Devin Dr and Donald Dr* 15,662 vpd
Moraga Road between Ascot Dr and Lucas Dr 17,712 vpd
* - within proposed Road Diet segment.

The volumes appear to be within these guidelines, and thus a road diet is a feasible option, subject to traffic analysis.

Vehicle Speeds
One benefit of a road diet is a speed reduction potential since traffic must filter into one lane. Studies from around the nation have shown that road diets can improve compliance with speed limits and reduce speeding.

Speed data was collected in addition to the traffic data in May 2024, and the results are shown in Table 2.

Table 2. 85th percentile speeds along Moraga Road.

Location 85% speed (MPH) % of speeds at or below 35 MPH Moraga Road between Paseo Linares and Draeger Dr* 44 mph 22% Moraga Road between Devin Dr and Donald Dr* 42 mph 24%
Moraga Road between Ascot Dr and Lucas Dr 37 mph 73%
* - within proposed Road Diet segment.

As can be seen, speed limit compliance within the four-lane section is low, with the 85th percentile speed (which can be used to determine speed limits) exceeding the speed limit by 7 to 9 mph. A prior speed study from 2021 showed speeds slightly lower, indicating that speeding is potentially increasing along the corridor.

Given the speeding problem, a road diet is a useful tool to reduce speeds to be closer to compliance with the posted speed limit.

Safety (Crashes)
Road diets have been found to have a beneficial impact on safety for users of all modes due to speed reduction of motor vehicles and the allocation of space to other modes. In addition, reducing from 4 lanes to 3 lanes improves visibility for left turning vehicles and reduces the number of potential conflict points. Studies have shown that the impact on crashes can be up to 64% reduction in injury crashes on segments, and up to 46% reduction in injury crashes at intersections.

Furthermore, the reallocation of space to allow for improved bike lane, as in the case of Moraga Road, has safety benefits. Safety data indicate that converting a traditional bike lane to a bike lane with flexible delineator posts in the buffer can reduce vehicle-bicycle crashes by up to 36%.

A safety of analysis of injury crashes between January 2018 and December 2023 showed that there were 3 bicycleinvolved crashes, one motorcycle crash, and five motor vehicles only crashes, as shown in Figure 4. One serious injury was reported (a bicyclist). Non-injury crash data was not available, but the safety benefits would apply to those crashes. Crashes by severity are presented graphically in Figure 5, and crashes by location are shown in Figure 6. 118
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 6
Figure 4. Crashes involving vulnerable road users and motor-vehicle only crashes, 2018 - 2023.

Figure 5. Crashes by severity, 2018 - 2023.
.

Figure 6. Crashes by location, by severity, 2018 - 2023. 5 1
3 Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Crashes, 2018 - 2023
Motor Vehicle Only
Motorcyclist
Bicycle Involved
3 5
1 Crashes by Severity, 2018 - 2023
Possible Injury
Minor Injury
Serious Injury
0 1
2 3
4 MORAGA RD at CORLISS
DR
MORAGA RD at ASCOT
DR
MORAGA RD at DONALD
DR
Not at Intersection
Crashes by Location, by Severity (2018 - 2023)
Possible Injury Minor Injury Serious Injury
119
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 7
Emergency Response
Based on best practices and case studies, there might be an improved response time for emergency vehicles due to the implementation of a two-way left turn lane allowing emergency vehicles to bypass vehicles. As noted by FHWA1, undivided multilane road can create a more chaotic environment because drivers might not be aware of the correct protocol for pulling over for an emergency vehicle. There also may not be space to pull over, or the pulling over may take more time to complete, particularly if there is congestion on the roadway.

Furthermore, as discussed earlier, road diets have a substantial impact on crashes of all types, including injury and property damage only (no injury) crashes. Therefore, the reduction in crashes expected as a result can reduce the number of incidents that emergency vehicles need to respond to. Thus, first responders can spend less time responding to traffic accidents and allow a more efficient use of resources.

Traffic Analysis Process
Capacity analysis was conducted using Synchro version 12 to assess the operations of the intersections. The intersections at Paseo Linares and Devin Dr will be omitted due to lack of traffic counts, and due to the relatively minor volumes that would be anticipated. A growth rate of two percent per year (2%) was selected for the purposes of this analysis. This rate was selected in order to conservatively account for future changes to the community and account for any unknowns. The volumes were grown to a horizon year of 2044.

Scenarios
A total of three scenarios were analyzed:

1. Existing roadway configuration with May 2024 volumes,

2. Road Diet configuration with May 2024 volumes, and

3. Road Diet configuration with Future (2044) projected volumes.

Traffic Analysis Results
Changes to the network and signals that were analyzed as part of the analysis included:
• At the intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr, signal timing was adjusted to improve operations. • At the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr, a traffic signal was included in the 2044 scenario only. • Road Diet – change to 3 lanes between Corliss Dr and just south of Donald Dr, transitioning to two through lanes in each direction in order to prevent poor signal operations and LOS.

Road Diet Impact
Using existing volumes, the road diet did not significantly impact traffic operations. Overall intersection Level of Service (LOS) remained the same, and delay increased by maximum of 3 seconds per vehicle. With appropriate changes to signals, including at Donald Dr, delay was in some instances reduced. In the future road diet condition (2044), all intersections are comfortably operating, with no intersections experiencing unstable operations (LOS E/F). 1 Road Diets and Emergency Response: Friends, not Foes. FHWA, 2017. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/road_diets/resources/pdf/fhwasa17020.pdf 120
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 8
Table 3. Comparison of LOS and delay in seconds for Existing roadway configuration with 2024 volumes, Roat Diet with 2024 volumes, and Road Diet with projected 2044 volumes.

Intersection
2024 Existing 2024 Road Diet 2044 Road Diet
AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr1 A/7.8 A/4.6 A/9.4 A/4.5 D/36.6 C/29.1 Moraga Road at Draeger Dr A/1.5 A/1.4 A/0.9 A/0.9 A/3.20 A/2.80 Moraga Road at Donald Dr C/26.7 B/17.7 C/29.4 B/17.5 D/39.9 C/24.5 Moraga Road at Ascot Dr C/27.4 C/22.5 C/21.4 C/23.3 C/32.1 C/29.3 1 – Signal assumed to be installed in 2044, and unsignalized in 2024 conditions.

At the intersection of Moraga Road at Donald Dr, queuing in the southbound direction decreased due to the overall signal operational changes.

Queuing along Moraga Rd at Ascot Dr appears to decrease along Moraga Rd northbound and southbound in the morning peak hour due to the signal operational changes.

Safety Improvements for Pedestrians
Safety at the Donald Dr intersection for pedestrians would be improved by adjusting the operations of the signal at Donald Dr.

Signal Warrant(s) at Unsignalized Intersection(s)
A signal at Corliss Dr would be warranted by existing traffic volumes and should be considered for installation in order to reduce delay for vehicles turning off of Corliss Dr in the road diet condition, since the existing merging lane is unsafe and would be removed in the road diet configuration. A signal at Corliss Dr would also improve safety, particularly given that two (2) sideswipe crashes (including one involving a motorcyclist and one involving a bicyclist, which resulted in a serious injury) have been reported.

No other unsignalized intersections would warrant signals.

Safety Improvements for Pedestrians
Safety for pedestrians would be improved at the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr intersection by signalizing the existing crosswalk.

Safety Benefits
Using the high-level crash reduction factors as noted earlier, the potential reduction due to the road diet and operational changes can be estimated. Converting the number of crashes observed in the study area to an annual number, a rough estimate of the number of crashes that might occur between 2024 and 2044 can be created. From that, applying the crash reduction factors can determine the approximate number of crashes that would be reduced as a result of the road diet. The cost of a crash can then be estimated to determine the safety benefit from implementing the project, using the cost of crashes as seen in Table 4. In total, as seen in Table 5, there is an estimated benefit of $106,027 per year (in 2024 dollars) from reduced crashes from implementing this project. 121
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Page 9
Table 4. Crash Costs from USDOT (in 2024 $).

Crash Severity Cost of Crashes
(USDOT, 2024 $)
Fatal $13,485,474
Serious Injury $1,281,875
Minor Injury $252,232
Possible Injury $120,506
Table 5. Estimated safety benefit from implementing Road Diet on Moraga Road.

Conclusions and Recommendations
Overall, the repurposing of a travel lane in the northbound and southbound directions along Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr would operate as efficiently or more efficiently than the existing condition.

Due to the potential increase in delay, lane repurposing on Moraga Road between Donald Dr and Ascot Dr would not be recommended. However, improving the safety of the bike lane through those intersections will need to be addressed.

A traffic signal at the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr is potentially warranted in current conditions, but certainly will be by 2044. The addition of a signal at Corliss Dr dramatically improves delay at that intersection while slightly increasing delay along Moraga Road.

The road diet configuration would represent a benefit to safety, both by reducing speeds of motor vehicles and by creating additional dedicated space for cyclists.

It is therefore recommended to move forward with the road diet configuration between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr. 122
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 1
To: Nate Levine, PE; Brian Horn; Town of Moraga, CA
From: Matt Fralick, PE, PTOE; Scott Shepard, PE; Alta Planning + Design Date: July 26, 2024
Re: Livable Moraga Rd - Traffic Analysis from Corliss Dr to Ascot Dr Introduction
In Feburary 2024, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority provided Alta Planning + Design (Alta) an additional task order to the existing Livable Moraga Road Project to perform a traffic analysis for the corridor of Moraga Road between Corliss Drive and Ascot Drive in the Town of Moraga in Contra Costa County, California. Moraga Road traverses through the center of Moraga, connecting to the City of Lafayette to the north and the SR 24 freeway. The corridor is residential from Corliss Dr to Ascot Dr, transitioning to commercial areas north of and at the intersection of Ascot Dr. Several parks and schools border the corridor. With this in mind, the City tasked Alta with conducting a traffic analysis of a road diet to this segment of Moraga Road, which will include a road diet to convert the 4-lane undivided segment to a 3-lane section with a buffered bike lane in the northbound direction.

Existing Conditions
Study Area
The study area along Moraga Road consists of the following 6 intersections between Corliss Dr and Ascot Dr:
• Moraga Road at Corliss Dr*
• Moraga Road at Paseo Linares
• Moraga Road at Draeger Dr*
• Moraga Road at Devin Dr
• Moraga Road at Donald Dr*
• Moraga Road at Ascot Dr*
*Intersection to be studied in this analysis. Counts were collected on Wednesday, May 22, 2024.

The intersection of Moraga Road and Devin Dr was not included in the analysis due to Devin Dr providing access to only a few residences. In addition, Devin Dr connects to the east to Draeger Dr, which is included in the analysis, and to Donald Dr, which is also included in the analysis.

The intersection of Moraga Road and Paseo Linares was not included in the analysis due to Paseo Linares providing access to only a few residences.

Roadway Characteristics
Moraga Road is a 4 lane undivided roadway that runs in the approximate north-south direction. Within the study area, the two northernmost intersections of Moraga Road at Donald Dr and at Ascot Dr are signalized. The other four intersections operate as a two-way stop-controlled intersection. The southernmost intersection of Moraga Road at Corliss Dr is an unsignalized version of a continuous green T intersection and provides the transition from a 2-lane to a 123
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 2
4-lane section. On street parking is provided in the southbound direction, adjacent to the curb. The posted speed limit on Moraga Road within the project limits is 35 miles per hour (mph).

Between the travel lane and parking lane in the southbound direction is a buffered Class II bike lane. A standard Class II bike lane is provided in the northbound direction. Sidewalk is provided on the west side of Moraga Road, with a gap in the sidewalk on the east side between Paseo Linares and Donald Dr. There is a crosswalk across Moraga Road at Corliss Dr, which is currently augmented with a flashing beacon and overhead pedestrian crossing signs. This crosswalk is scheduled for enhancements, including advance signage and an upgrade to a rectangular rapid flshing beacon (RRFB) as part of a Caltrans-funded safety project1. In addition, there are bus stops in both directions just north of Corliss Dr, at Devin Dr, and just north of Ascot Dr.

Within the 4-lane undivided section, the roadway is approximately 70 ft wide, with 11-ft wide lanes and a 6 ft wide bike lane on the east side, and a 7 ft buffered bike lane (inclusive of a 2 ft buffer) adjacent to a 6.5 ft wide parking lane, 1.5 ft curb and gutter, and sidewalk. This is shown graphically in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows the whole Moraga Road corridor with respective lane movements and intersection control.

Figure 1. Existing cross section of Moraga Road, representing 4-lane section from Corliss Dr to Donald Dr. Created using Streetmix (https://streetmix.net).
1 Project List for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 11. CalTrans, 2023. https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/local-assistance/documents/hsip/2023/cycle11fundedprojectsii-v2.pdf 124
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 3
Figure 2. Existing lane configuration and intersection traffic control along Moraga Road.

Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Traffic volume counts were collected in three areas on Moraga Road during a 48-period from 6:00 PM on Tuesday, May 21, 2024, to 6:00 PM on Thursday, May 23, 2024. The collected volume data can be found as part of Appendix A.

The three areas that were collected reported the following average daily traffic (ADT) volumes are listed from south to north in Table 1.

Table 1. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts along Moraga Road.

Speeds
In conjunction with the volume counts, speed data was also collected at the same three locations within the study area. The collected speed data can be found as part of Appendix A. 125
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 4
The results of the speed study are presented in Table 2 with the 85th percentile speed reported for overall, northbound (NB), and southbound (SB), with the cumulative percent of vehicle speeds at or below the 35 MPH speed limit also noted.

Table 2. 85th percentile speeds along Moraga Road.

Location
85th % speed (MPH) % of vehicle speeds
Overall NB SB below 35 MPH
Moraga Road between Paseo Linares and Draeger Dr* 44 mph 41 mph 46 mph 22% Moraga Road between Devin Dr and Donald Dr* 42 mph 43 mph 41 mph 24% Moraga Road between Ascot Dr and Lucas Dr 37 mph 39 mph 35 mph 73% * - within Road Diet segment.
85th percentile speeds exceeded the speed limit (35 mph) in all locations, with the speed generally increasing in the southbound direction and decreasing in the northbound direction. Mean and median speeds from the two locations within the study area indicate that both the mean and median speeds exceed the posted speed. Only between 22% and 24% of vehicles south of Ascot Dr were measured to be travelling at or below the speed limit.

A prior speed study was conducted by the Town of Moraga in April and May 2021, which found that 85th percentile speeds were 41 mph south of Corliss Dr, 42 mph from Corliss Dr to Donald Dr, and 42 mph north of Donald Dr. Based on these results, speeding has potentially increased within certain parts of the study area.

Turning Movement Counts
Turning movement counts were collected at select study intersections (noted above with an *) on Wednesday, May 22, 2024, from 6:00 AM to 9:00 AM and from 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The peak hours were found to be 7:45 to 8:45 for the AM peak and 3:00 to 4:00 for the PM peak. Pedestrian and bicycle counts were collected for each intersection along Moraga Road. In addition, peak hour factors and heavy vehicle percentages were provided as part of the counts. The collected turning movement counts, volumes, and speed data can be found in Appendix A.

Crash Analysis
Crash data was obtained from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS), a product of the University of California, Berkeley, for injury crashes in the study area from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2023. Data was collected for six years in order to have two full years of crash data before and two years after the COVID-19 pandemic-affected years of data (2020 and 2021). Property damage only crashes (ie, crashes without injury) are not collected by TIMS and as such are not included in this analysis.

Crash Summary
Between January 2018 and December 2023, a total of nine (9) injury crashes were reported. Two of these crashes occurred in 2018, three in 2019, and four in 2022. No injury crashes were reported in 2020, 2021, or 2023. 126
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 5
Crashes by Mode and Type
Of the 9 injury crashes reported between January 2018 and December 2023, four (4) crashes involved a vulnerable road user, which includes bicyclists, pedestrians, and motorcyclists. These crashes included:
• Three (3) crashes involving a bicycle, including:
o Two (2) crashes reported as sideswipes, and
o One (1) crash in which a motor vehicle failed to yield the right of way to a bicycle (note that this crash was coded as pedestrian due to bicycles not being considered as a separate category in reporting the primary factor of the collision)
• One (1) crash involving a motorcyclist, a sideswipe crash resulting in a minor injury. • No pedestrian-involved crashes were reported.

The remaining five crashes involved only a motor vehicle, including:
• Two (2) fixed object crashes
• Two (2) Rear end crashes
• One (1) rollover crash
The crashes by mode are shown graphically in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Crashes involving vulnerable road users and motor-vehicle only crashes, 2018 - 2023.

Crashes by Severity
In total, five of the crashes reported a possible injury, three reported a minor injury, and one reported a serious injury. The crashes by severity are shown in Figure 4.
5 1
3 Vulnerable Road User (VRU) Crashes, 2018 - 2023
Motor Vehicle Only
Motorcyclist
Bicycle Involved
127
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 6
Figure 4. Crashes by severity, 2018 - 2023.

Crashes by Intersection
A total of eight crashes were reported as occurring at intersections. By intersection, they were reported as follows:
• The intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr was the highest crash intersection, with 4 crashes reported, including a crash with serious injury.
o Two (2) crashes were sideswipe. This included one serious injury crash, which involved a bicyclist, and a minor injury crash involving a motorcyclist.
o One (1) rear end and rollover crash were each reported. • The intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr reported three (3) crashes. o One (1) crash of each of fixed object, rear end, and sideswipe was reported. • The intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr reported one (1) crash, a bicycle crash involving the failure of the motor vehicle to yield right of way to a cyclist.

One (1) crash did not occur at an intersection, which was a fixed object crash which occurred on Moraga Road between Donald Dr and Ascot Dr.

The number of crashes by severity, by location, are displayed in Figure 5. All injury crashes from 2018 to 2023 were mapped onto the study area and are presented in Figure 6. 3 5
1 Crashes by Severity, 2018 - 2023
Possible Injury
Minor Injury
Serious Injury
128
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 7
.

Figure 5. Crashes by location, by severity, 2018 - 2023. 0 1
2 3
4 MORAGA RD at

CORLISS DR
MORAGA RD at ASCOT
DR
MORAGA RD at

DONALD DR
Not at Intersection
Crashes by Location, by Severity (2018 - 2023)
Possible Injury Minor Injury Serious Injury
129
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 8
Figure 6. Crashes along Moraga Road within study area (blue-green line) from January 2018 to December 2023. 130
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 9
Road Diet Feasibility
The road diet cross section, as desired by the Town, is to convert a section of Moraga Road from a four-lane, undivided road to a three-lane cross section with a two-way center turn lane, which will allow for addition of a buffer to the northbound bike lane. A generalized road diet conversion is shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7. Road Diet conversion for a typical four-lane, undivided roadway.

By repurposing the space, the aim is to improve safety and potentially operations, particularly in areas where the innermost through lane de facto acts as a turn lane.

Traffic Volumes
Per FHWA, road diets are most effective on roads with an average daily traffic (ADT) volume of up to 20,000 vehicles per day (vpd)2. For roadways with ADT between 10,000 vpd and 20,000, further analysis is recommended, including intersection analyses and signal retiming for roadways with ADT between 10,000 and 15,000 vpd. For roadways with ADT between 15,000 and 20,000 vpd, corridor analysis may be necessary in addition to signal and intersection analyses.

The traffic volumes collected by this study appear to be within these guidelines, and thus a road diet is a potentially feasible option, subject to the operational analysis.
2 Road Diet FAQ (FHWA-SA-17-021), section “What is the maximum traffic volume for a four-lane to three-lane Road Diet conversion?” FHWA, 2017. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/road_diets/resources/pdf/fhwasa17021.pdf 131
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 10
Benefits
Vehicle Speeds
One benefit of a road diet is a speed reduction potential, as traffic must filter into one lane. Speed differentials between lanes are also reduced. Studies from around the nation have shown that road diets can improve compliance with speed limits and reduce speeding.3
Since speeds on the corridor are reported to exceed the speed limit by 7 to 9 mph, a road diet is potentially a useful tool to reduce speeds.

Safety (Crash Reduction)
Road diets have been found to have a beneficial impact on safety for users of all modes due to speed reduction of motor vehicles and the allocation of space to other modes. Studies have shown that the impact on crashes can be up to 64% reduction in injury crashes on segments, and up to 46% reduction in injury crashes at intersections4.

Furthermore, the reallocation of space to allow for improved bike lane, as in the case of Moraga Road, has safety benefits. Safety data indicate that converting a traditional bike lane to a separated bike lane with flexible delineator posts can reduce vehicle-bicycle crashes by up to 36%5
.

Emergency Response Benefits
Based on best practices and case studies, there might be an improved response time for emergency vehicles due to the implementation of a two-way left turn lane allowing emergency vehicles to bypass vehicles. As noted by FHWA6, undivided multilane road can create a more chaotic environment because drivers might not be aware of the correct protocol for pulling over for an emergency vehicle. There also may not be space to pull over, or the pulling over may take more time to complete, particularly if there is congestion on the roadway.

Analysis
Based on the existing volumes, speeds, and crash history of the roadway, a road diet appears to be an appropriate measure to improve the safety of the network. The next step is to determine the operational effects that implementing a road diet would have upon the network.
3 Road Diet Case Studies (FHWA-SA-15-052). FHWA, 2015.
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/road_diets/case_studies/roaddiet_cs.pdf 4 CMFs 11128, 11129, 11133, 11134. CMF Clearinghouse. https://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/study_detail.php?stid=649 5 CMF 11301. CMF Clearinghouse. https://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/detail.php?facid=11301 6 Road Diets and Emergency Response: Friends, not Foes. FHWA, 2017. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/road_diets/resources/pdf/fhwasa17020.pdf 132
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 11
Traffic Analysis
Growth Rate
A growth rate of two percent per year (2%) was selected for the purposes of this analysis. This rate was selected in order to conservatively account for future changes to the community and account for any unknowns. The volumes were grown to a horizon year of 2044. The total increase in volumes as a result of this growth rate is 48.6%. The grown volumes can be found in Appendix A.

Process
Capacity analysis was conducted using Synchro version 12 to assess the level of service (LOS) and delay at the intersections. The intersections at Paseo Linares and Devin Dr will be omitted due to lack of traffic counts, and due to the relatively minor volumes that would be anticipated.

Reports were created to provide the delay and LOS, as well as 95th percentile queues. LOS is a measure of the delay experienced by stopped vehicles at intersections. LOS is rated on a scale from A to F, with A describing a condition of very low delay (less than 10 seconds per vehicle), and F describing a condition where delays will exceed 80 seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections and 50 seconds per vehicle for unsignalized intersections. Delay is described as a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Therefore, intersections with longer delay times are less acceptable to most drivers. The delay limits for each category, based on the Highway Capacity Manual, seventh edition, are shown in Table 1.

Table 3: Level of Service Delay Limits
LOS
Signalized Intersection
Delay per Vehicle (sec/veh)
Unsignalized Intersection
Delay per Vehicle (sec/veh)
A ≤10.0 ≤10.0
B 10.1–20.0 10.1–15.0
C 20.1–35.0 15.1–25.0
D 35.1–55.0 25.1–35.0
E 55.1–80.0 35.1–50.0
F > 80.0 > 50.0
133
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 12
Traffic Analysis – Existing Conditions with Current (2024) and 2044 Volumes Existing Roadway Configuration with Current (2024) Volumes Signal Operations
The intersection of Moraga Dr and Donald Dr operates with protected-only northbound and southbound left turns on Moraga Road. Donald Dr operates with a 6-second (s) Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) that gives pedestrians the ability to advance into the intersection before the signal turns green. The Donald Dr leg operates with permissive-only left turns.

The Intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr operates with leading-lagging left turns on Moraga Road. The westbound approach from the shopping center is given two phases – a short phase immediately after the Moraga Road phases, and a longer phase including the pedestrian signal which follows the eastbound Ascot Dr split phase.

Level of Service and Delay
The existing roadway configuration with 2024 volumes were modeled in Synchro using the collected turning movement counts for both the AM and PM peak conditions. Table 2 reports the delay in seconds per vehicle and the corresponding LOS for the existing roadway configuration with 2024 volumes in the AM and PM peaks. Table 3 reports the 95th percentile queue lengths in feet for the existing roadway configuration with 2024 volumes in the AM and PM peaks. The Synchro HCM 7 reports can be found in Appendix B.

Table 4: Existing Roadway Configuration with current (2024) volumes, Operational Analysis Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at
Corliss Dr
A 7.8 A 4.6
Eastbound E 36.8 D 30.2
Westbound - - - -
Northbound3 - - A 0
Southbound A 0 A 0
Moraga Road at
Draeger Dr
A 1.5 A 1.4
Eastbound - - - -
Westbound E 35.4 D 30.9
Northbound A 0 A 0
Southbound A 1.0 A 0.98
Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at
Donald Dr5
C 26.7 B 17.7
Eastbound E 55.4 D 54.5
Westbound D 39.8 D 47.9
Northbound B 15.2 A 9.2
Southbound C 29.7 C 21.5
Moraga Road at
Ascot Dr5
C 27.4 C 22.5
Eastbound D 52.5 D 53.1
Westbound D 50.3 D 50.9
Northbound C 27.1 C 21.3
Southbound C 20.0 B 18.9
1 – Level of Service
2 – Delay in seconds per vehicle
3 – Delay northbound not reported due to intersection configuration in the model. 4 – HCM 2000 due to presence of Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) 5 – HCM 2000 due to presence of non-standard NEMA phasing 134
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 13
Table 5: Existing Roadway Configuration with current (2024) volumes, 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Summary Intersection
Weekday AM Weekday PM
Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr
Eastbound 114 - - 103 - -
Westbound - - - - - -
Northbound 48 NR - 37 NR -
Southbound - 50 8 - 102 4
Moraga Road at Draeger Dr
Eastbound - - - - - -
Westbound 62 - - 64 - -
Northbound - 3 - - 4 -
Southbound - 98 - - 123 -
Moraga Road at Donald Dr
Eastbound - 176 64 - 104 55
Westbound - 65 - - 31 -
Northbound 92 142 - 80 113 -
Southbound 57 258 - 43 239 -
Moraga Road at Ascot Dr
Eastbound 134 - 58 115 - 50
Westbound - 55 - - 56 -
Northbound 92 209 - 111 191 -
Southbound 39 236 - 63 232 -
NR – Queuing not reported due to intersection configuration Bold – Exceeds storage length
Some items of note are:
• No queues exceed the existing storage length.
• The unsignalized intersections of Moraga Rd at Corliss Dr and Moraga Road at Draeger Dr are approaching LOS F in the AM peak.
• The signalized intersections of Moraga Rd at Donald Dr and Moraga Road at Ascot Dr report higher queuing in the southbound direction. This could be due to the higher number of right turns onto both Ascot Dr and Donald Dr as compared to northbound.
• The eastbound approach of Donald Dr at the intersection with Moraga Road is approaching LOS F in the AM peak. This is likely due to the high number of vehicles attempting to turn left on a permissive-only left turn phase from a shared left/through lane.

Existing Roadway Configuration with 2044 Volumes (No Build Conditions) To determine the 2044 no-build conditions analysis, the volumes were grown to the future year using the Townapproved growth rate. Using these volumes, Alta analyzed the no-build conditions. 135
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 14
Operational Changes
Based on information received from the Town, an adaptive signal system is scheduled for installation by 2026.

Accordingly, the phases, splits and cycle lengths differ from the existing roadway configuration with 2024 volumes, and were optimized to improve operations. The LPI at Donald Dr is maintained. It should be noted that the signal timing and phasing represent only one of several possible timings, and signal timings were selected to provide the lowest delays on the Moraga Road approaches.

Left turns on Moraga Road at Ascot Dr were adjusted to be lagging in both directions in the morning peak, and leadlag in the afternoon peak. The westbound split phase was adjusted to only occur once in a cycle, instead of the current two phases, one short and one long with the pedestrian crossing, allocated to the shopping center.

Left turns on Moraga Road at Donald Dr were adjusted to be lead-lag in the morning peak, and lagging in the afternoon peak.

Level of Service and Delay
Table 4 reports the delay in seconds per vehicle and the corresponding LOS for the 2044 no-build AM and PM peaks.

Table 5 reports the 95th percentile queues in feet for the 2044 no-build conditions in the AM and PM peaks. The Synchro reports can be found in Appendix C.

Table 6: Existing Roadway Configuration with 2044 volumes (No Build), Operational Analysis Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at
Corliss Dr
F 91.7 E 48.7
Eastbound F 430.3 F 318.9
Westbound - - - -
Northbound3 NR NR NR NR
Southbound A 0 A 0
Moraga Road at
Draeger Dr
A 15.5 A 12.4
Eastbound - - - -
Westbound F 497.4 F 394.2
Northbound A 0 A 0
Southbound A 3.02 A 2.97
Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at
Donald Dr4
D 49.0 B 11.4
Eastbound D 54.6 E 58.2
Westbound C 33.2 D 45.4
Northbound C 30.7 B 13.2
Southbound E 67.8 A 3.4
Moraga Road at
Ascot Dr
D 37.9 C 30.3
Eastbound E 64.8 E 63.4
Westbound E 62.8 E 68.4
Northbound C 24.7 A 7.1
Southbound D 45.8 D 45.2
1 – Level of Service
2 – Delay in seconds per vehicle
3 – Delay northbound not reported due to intersection configuration in the model. 4 – HCM 2000 due to presence of Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) 136
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 15
Table 7: Existing Roadway Configuration with 2044 volumes (No Build), 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Summary Intersection
Weekday AM Weekday PM
Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr
Eastbound 198 - - 201 - -
Westbound - - - - - -
Northbound 67 NR - 62 NR -
Southbound - 28 12 - 174 11
Moraga Road at Draeger Dr
Eastbound - - - - - -
Westbound 99 - - 148 - -
Northbound - 3 - - 6 -
Southbound - 220 - - 270 -
Moraga Road at Donald Dr
Eastbound - 237 73 - 141 63
Westbound - 93 - - 43 -
Northbound 143 285 - 131 265 -
Southbound 46 309 - 51 223 -
Moraga Road at Ascot Dr
Eastbound 137 - 81 131 - 55
Westbound - 71 - - 73 -
Northbound 149 378 - 183 292 -
Southbound 86 370 - 84 339 -
NR – Queuing not reported due to intersection configuration Bold – Exceeds storage length
Some items of note are:
• The intersection of Moraga Rd at Corliss Dr worsens from LOS A in 2024 to LOS F in 2044 with the unsignalized intersection maintained.
o Corliss Dr eastbound moves from LOS E/D in 2024 to LOS F in both peak hours. This is primarily due to the increase in volumes along Moraga Road preventing adequate gaps in traffic for which a turn can be made.
o Corliss Dr eastbound delays exceed 7 minutes in the AM peak, and 5 minutes in the PM peak. o Trip redistribution is not within the scope of this study but could be expected due to the delay. • Draeger Dr westbound reports LOS F during both AM and PM peak hours, going from LOS D/E in 2024 to LOS F in 2044. Delays on Draeger Dr exceed 8 min in the AM peak, and 6 min in the PM peak. This could be reduced with restriping to add dedicated left and right turn lanes, or by encouraging left turns to redistribute to the signalized intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr. • At the intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr, LOS in the AM peak worsened from LOS C to LOS D, an increase of delay of around 20 s/veh. Notably, the Donald Dr approaches both improved LOS, while Moraga 137
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 16
Rd LOS worsened to LOS C northbound and LOS E southbound. Despite this, queues southbound did not exceed the storage distance and thus were not reported to block the intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr.
o In the PM peak, level of service remained the same as 2024, with delay at the intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr decreasing by around 6 s/veh, and increasing by about 5s/veh at the intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr.
• Northbound left turn queues exceeded storage bay distances in the 95th percentile queuing analysis at the signalized intersections of Moraga Road at Donald Dr and at Ascot Dr. However, in both instances, queues did not extend beyond the taper of the turn bay.
138
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 17
Traffic Analysis – Road Diet with Current (2024) and 2044 Volumes Road Diet with Current Year (2024) Volumes
Road Diet Configuration
The road diet conditions along Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr will repurpose the outside northbound and southbound through lane. One through lane in each direction will be maintained. A two-way left turn lane will be added to allow safer turns onto the side streets and driveways. The buffer for the southbound bike lane would be widened. northbound bike lane would be improved from a standard class II bikeway to a class IV separated bikeway with flexible delineator posts. These changes are represented graphically in Figure 8, which shows one potential configuration that includes a wider buffer and wider bike lanes in both directions.

Figure 8. Road diet cross section for Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr, incorporating 3-lane cross section with two-way left turn lane, wider bike lanes and buffers. Created using Streetmix (https://streetmix.net).

Based on preliminary analysis, two through lanes would be required on Moraga Road on the approach to the signal at Donald Dr. Two lanes would need to be maintained on Moraga Road, matching the existing cross-section, north of Donald Dr. The southbound lanes on Moraga Road would merge into one lane just south of the intersection with Donald Dr.

At the intersection of Moraga Road with Draeger Dr, Draeger Dr westbound will maintain the current geometry.

At the intersection of Moraga Road with Corliss Dr, Corliss Dr eastbound is recommended to be restriped to add a dedicated right turn lane. Due to the lane reconfiguration, the existing intersection was assumed to be reconfigured to a standard intersection with no merging lane for eastbound left turns.

Figure 9 shows the lane configuration and traffic control for the road diet with 2024 volumes.

CROSS SECTION FOR ILLUSTRATIVE
PURPOSES ONLY. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION.
139
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 18
Figure 9: Road Diet lane configuration and intersection traffic control along Moraga Road – current year (2024) volumes. 140
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 19
Signal Warrants
A traffic signals warrant should be conducted at the Corliss Dr intersection to see if a signal would be warranted in the existing roadway configuration with current (2024) volumes. Due to the speed counts indicating that 85th percentile speeds in the study area exceed 40 mph, the 70% factor condition for the signal warrant may apply. Based on the six hours of counts provided, a signal is potentially warranted based on the four-hour warrant and peak hour warrant at the Corliss Dr intersection in the base condition. The eight-hour warrant may be met by some hours, but the counts were only collected for a total of six hours or the day, so it is unclear is the warrant can be met.

The Draeger Dr intersection appears not to meet warrants.

Table 8 shows an analysis of signal warrants for the two unsignalized intersections. Pedestrian, school, and safety warrants are not met by either intersection. An asterisk (*) denotes that the warrant is met using the 70% factor. The condition, A or B, is noted where each condition (or both) applies.

Table 8. Signal Warrants for Unsignalized Intersections, Road Diet with Current Year (2024) Volumes.

Intersection Volumes Eight Hour Four Hour Peak Hour
Major Minor Met? Met? Met?
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr Undetermined Met Met
6am to 7am 245 32 No No No
7am to 8am 646 74 Yes* (B) No No
8am to 9am 1357 193 Yes (A + B) Yes Yes (B)
3pm to 4pm 1563 154 Yes (A + B) Yes Yes (B)
4pm to 5pm 1241 102 Yes* (B) Yes* Yes* (B)
5pm to 6pm 1253 126 Yes* (A + B) Yes* Yes* (B)
Moraga Road at Draeger Dr Undetermined Undetermined Undetermined 6am to 7am 280 11 No No No
7am to 8am 717 31 No No No
8am to 9am 1456 39 No No No
3pm to 4pm 1680 48 No No No
4pm to 5pm 1325 37 No No No
5pm to 6pm 1339 29 No No No
Dark Green – Warrant is met during this hour.

Light Green – Warrant is met only when using the 70% factor. (A), (B), (A + B) – warrant is met using the Condition noted by the letter Operational Changes
In order to improve safety, changes to signals were more comprehensive.

The intersection of Moraga Road at Donald Dr was adjusted to be a split-phase signal. The LPI was removed due to the relatively low traffic from the westbound Donald Dr approach and the high number of left-turning vehicles, combined with the improved safety effect from separating the pedestrians from turning vehicles. Left turns from Moraga Road onto Donald Dr were adjusted to be lagging in both morning and afternoon peak. 141
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 20
At the intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr, left turns from Moraga Road onto Ascot Dr onto Moraga Road were adjusted to be lead-lag in the morning peak, and lagging in the afternoon peak. The Ascot Dr westbound split phase was adjusted to only occur once in a cycle, instead of the current two phases, one short and one long with the pedestrian crossing, allocated to the shopping center.

A signal at the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr was not included in this analysis for the current year.

Level of Service and Delay
Table 9 reports the delay in seconds per vehicle and the corresponding LOS for the road diet with 2024 volumes in the AM and PM peaks. Table 10 reports the 95th percentile queues in feet for road diet with 2024 volumes in the AM and PM peaks. The Synchro reports can be found in Appendix D.

Table 9: Road Diet with Current Year (2024) Volumes Operational Analysis Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at Corliss
Dr
A 9.4 A 4.5
Eastbound F 75.14 E 48.94
Westbound - - - -
Northbound A 0.61 A 0.33
Southbound A 0 A 0
Moraga Road at
Draeger Dr
A 0.9 A 0.9
Eastbound - - - -
Westbound D 26.56 D 25.16
Northbound A 0 A 0
Southbound A 0.36 A 0.33
Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at Donald
Dr
C 29.4 B 17.5
Eastbound E 61.1 E 66.2
Westbound E 60.6 E 67.1
Northbound C 33.4 C 23.7
Southbound B 14.0 A 4.8
Moraga Road at Ascot
Dr
C 21.4 C 23.3
Eastbound E 59.0 E 66.0
Westbound E 63.0 E 77.6
Northbound A 2.3 A 5.5
Southbound C 32.9 C 31.8
1 – Level of Service
2 – Delay in seconds per vehicle
142
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 21
Table 10: Road Diet with Current Year (2024) Volumes 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Summary Intersection
Weekday AM Weekday PM
Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr
Eastbound 168 - 111 142 - 53
Westbound - - - - - -
Northbound 44 20 - 35 19 -
Southbound - 10 8 - 3 11
Moraga Road at Draeger Dr
Eastbound - - - - - -
Westbound 55 - - 74 - -
Northbound - 0 - - 3 -
Southbound 34 0 - 40 0 -
Moraga Road at Donald Dr
Eastbound - 186 59 - 130 55
Westbound - 77 - - 37 -
Northbound 98 174 - 92 122 -
Southbound 43 177 - 55 122 -
Moraga Road at Ascot Dr
Eastbound 136 - 56 126 - 42
Westbound - 62 - - 60 -
Northbound 85 195 - 104 140 -
Southbound 54 246 - 75 272 -
Bold – Exceeds storage length
*95th percent queue exceeds storage; upstream intersection blocked only 1% of the time.

Some items of note are:
• Overall, delay does not increase or decrease by more than 5 seconds per vehicle, with the exception of the intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr, with a decrease in delay of 6 s/veh caused by the signalization changes.
• No queues exceed storage length on Moraga Road.
• At the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr, the proposed right turn lane (length 75 ft) appears to be blocked by the left-turning vehicles about 32% of the time in the AM peak, and about 23% in the PM peak. • At the intersection of Moraga Road at Donald Dr, queuing in the southbound direction decreased due to the overall operational changes at the signals.
• Queuing along Moraga Rd at Ascot Dr appears to decrease along Moraga Rd northbound and southbound in the morning peak hour due to the operational changes at the signals. • At both the intersections of Moraga Road with Donald Dr and Moraga Road with Ascot Dr, the minor streets (Donald Dr and Ascot Dr) report worsened LOS, decreasing from LOS D to LOS E in all movements in all peaks.

This is likely due to the operational changes at the signals. 143
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 22
Comparison to 2024 Existing Conditions
For reference, Table 11 shows the comparison of LOS and delay using 2024 volumes for the existing roadway configuration and the road diet configuration.

Table 11. Existing vs. Road Diet Roadway Configuration – Existing (2024) Volumes Intersection
Weekday AM Weekday PM
2024
Existing
2024
Road Diet
2024
Existing
2024
Road Diet
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr A/7.8 A/9.4 A/4.6 A/4.5
Moraga Road at Draeger Dr A/1.5 A/0.9 A/1.4 A/0.9
Moraga Road at Donald Dr C/26.7 C/29.4 B/17.7 B/17.5
Moraga Road at Ascot Dr C/27.4 C/21.4 C/22.5 C/23.3
Bold – Decreased Delay by 5 or more s/veh
Underline – Increased Delay by 5 or more s/veh
Green – Improved LOS
Orange – Worsened LOS
Road Diet with 2044 Volumes
The road diet conditions using the 2044 traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak volumes were input into Synchro and analyzed.

Lane Configuration
The lane configuration will match the lane configuration of the road diet from the 2024 volume scenario.

Signal Warrants
Based on the findings from the signal warrants in the current year conditions, a signal at the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr might be warranted. However, by 2044, the increase in traffic and delay would almost certainly warrant installation of a traffic signal.

Based on the projected traffic values, a signal at Draeger Dr would not be warranted.

Operational Changes
The intersection of Moraga Road at Donald Dr was adjusted to be a split-phase signal; the LPI was removed due to the relatively low traffic from the westbound Donald Dr approach and the high number of left-turning vehicles, combined with the improved safety effect from separating the pedestrians from turning vehicles. Left turns from Moraga Road onto Donald Dr were adjusted to be lagging in both morning and afternoon peak.

At the intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr, left turns from Moraga Road onto Ascot Dr onto Moraga Road were adjusted to be lead-lag in the morning peak, and lagging in the afternoon peak. The Ascot Dr westbound split phase was adjusted to only occur once in a cycle, instead of the current two phases, one short and one long with the pedestrian crossing, allocated to the shopping center.

At the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr, a traffic signal is proposed. Left turns northbound off Moraga Road are protected-only to improve safety of the crosswalk and bike lane. 144
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 23
No changes are proposed to the intersection of Moraga Road and Draeger Dr.

Figure 10 shows the road diet lane configuration and signalization along Moraga Road in the year 2044.

Figure 10. Road Diet lane configuration and intersection traffic control along Moraga Road – 2044 volumes.

Level of Service and Delay
Table 12 reports the delay in seconds per vehicle and the corresponding LOS for the road diet with 2044 volumes in the AM and PM peaks. Table 13 reports the 95th percentile queues in feet the road diet with 2044 volumes in the AM and PM peaks. The Synchro reports can be found in Appendix E. 145
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 24
Table 12: Road Diet with 2044 Volumes Operational Analysis Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at Corliss
Dr
D 36.6 C 29.1
Eastbound E 63.8 D 52.7
Westbound - - - -
Northbound C 25.8 B 16.9
Southbound D 39.5 C 34.9
Moraga Road at
Draeger Dr
A 3.2 A 2.8
Eastbound - - - -
Westbound F 104.7 F 91.8
Northbound A 0 A 0
Southbound A 0.49 A 0.44
Intersection Weekday AM Weekday PM
LOS1 Delay2LOS1 Delay2
Moraga Road at Donald
Dr
D 39.9 C 24.5
Eastbound E 62.5 E 72.1
Westbound E 76.6 E 69.6
Northbound D 51.4 C 34.5
Southbound B 18.8 A 8.1
Moraga Road at Ascot
Dr
C 32.1 C 29.3
Eastbound D 55.0 E 69.7
Westbound E 56.6 E 75.3
Northbound B 14.5 A 3.9
Southbound D 46.4 D 44.5
1 – Level of Service
2 – Delay in seconds per vehicle
146
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 25
Table 13: Road Diet with 2044 Volumes 95th Percentile Queue (ft) Summary Intersection
Weekday AM Weekday PM
Left Thru Right Left Thru Right
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr
Eastbound 182 - 135 185 - 119
Westbound - - - - - -
Northbound 151 268 - 132 273 -
Southbound - 616 289 - 458 275
Moraga Road at Draeger Dr
Eastbound - - - - - -
Westbound 156 - - 129 - -
Northbound - 6 - - 7 -
Southbound 58 44 - 52 11 -
Moraga Road at Donald Dr
Eastbound - 253 102 - 162 77
Westbound - 118 - - 44 -
Northbound 187 473 - 129 261 -
Southbound 72 312 - 78 382 -
Moraga Road at Ascot Dr
Eastbound 141 - 84 135 - 62
Westbound - 68 - - 74 -
Northbound 147 334 - 188 254 -
Southbound 97 349 - 103 392 -
Bold – Exceeds storage length
Some items of note are:
• At the intersection of Moraga Road at Corliss Dr, delay decreased by about 55 s/veh in the AM peak, and by about 20 s/veh in the PM peak after the installation of the traffic signal. Corliss Dr eastbound delays decreased by about 6 minutes in the AM peak, and by about 4 min in the PM peak. o LOS improved from LOS F to LOS D in the AM, or LOS C in the PM. o Turn bays northbound and the turn lane eastbound would need to be extended. On Corliss Dr, this would require removal of some on-street parking.
o The southbound right-turn lane would need to be extended and the buffered bike lane shortened. • At the intersection of Moraga Road at Draeger Dr, although the LOS is A, Drager Dr westbound delays are between 1.5 min and 2 min in both peak hours. This could be reduced with restriping to add dedicated left and right turn lanes, or by encouraging left turns to redistribute to the signalized intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr.
• At the intersection of Moraga Road at Donald Dr, the northbound left turn bay needs to be extended further south as queues extend past the turn bay.
• Compared to the no-build scenario at the intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr, the LOS worsened from LOS B to LOS C. Delay increased by about 18 s/veh. This is due to the introduction of split-phase signals 147
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 26
on the Donald Dr approaches. However, safety for turning vehicles and pedestrians is improved by this change.
• Compared to the no-build scenario, delay decreased at the intersection of Moraga Road and Ascot Dr by almost 6 s/veh in the AM peak, and by about 1 s/veh in the PM peak. LOS improved from LOS D to LOS C in the AM peak and remained at LOS C in the PM peak. This is due to the changes in cycle length which were made in coordination with the signal at Moraga Road and Donald Dr.

Table 14. Crash Costs from USDOT (in 2024 $).

Crash Severity Cost of Crashes
(USDOT, 2024 $)
Fatal $13,485,474
Serious Injury $1,281,875
Minor Injury $252,232
Possible Injury $120,506
Table 15. Estimated safety benefit from implementing Road Diet on Moraga Road.

Crash Severity # of Crashes
(2018 – 2023)
Expected # of Crashes
(2024 – 2044)
# of Crashes Reduced
(2024 – 2044)
Cost Benefits from
reduced Crashes
Fatal 0 - - -
Serious Injury 1 3.33 1.2 $1,538,250
Minor Injury 3 10.0 2.13 $538,095
Possible Injury 5 16.7 0.367 $44,186
Cumulative benefit (2024 $) $2,120,530
Annual benefit $106,027/yr
148
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 27
Comparison
To better understand the difference between the 2044 no-build conditions and the 2044 road diet conditions, the LOS and delays for each condition were put side by side. Table 16 shows the comparison of LOS and delay for the 2044 nobuild conditions and the 2044 road diet conditions. In general, the 2044 no-build conditions report higher delays at the signalized, with exception of Donald Dr, and reports larger 95th percentile queues. The addition of the traffic signals in the 2044 road diet conditions relieves the congestion reported in the 2044 no-build conditions at Corliss Dr.

Table 16: Existing vs. Road Diet Roadway Configuration Delay Comparison – 2044 Volumes Intersection
Weekday AM Weekday PM
2044
Existing
2044
Road Diet
2044
Existing
2044
Road Diet
Moraga Road at Corliss Dr F/91.7 D/36.6 E/48.7 C/29.1
Moraga Road at Draeger Dr A/15.5 A/3.20 A/12.4 A/2.80
Moraga Road at Donald Dr D/49.0 D/39.9 B/11.4 C/24.5
Moraga Road at Ascot Dr D/37.9 C/32.1 C/30.3 C/29.3
Bold – Decreased Delay by 5 or more s/veh
Underline – Increased Delay by 5 or more s/veh
Green – Improved LOS
Orange – Worsened LOS
149
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA 28
Conclusions and Recommendations
Overall, the repurposing of a travel lane in the northbound and southbound directions along Moraga Road between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr would operate more efficiently than the existing roadway configuration when combined with other operational and safety improvements. In the case of the intersection of Moraga Road at Donald Dr, delay increased in the PM peak, but operations are still at LOS C, well within acceptable operations.

Due to the increase in delay, implementing a road diet on Moraga Road between Donald Dr and Ascot Dr would not be recommended. However, improving the safety of the bike lane through those intersections will need to be addressed.

A traffic signal at the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr is potentially warranted in current conditions, but certainly will be by 2044. This will be made more urgent by the repurposing of lanes as part of the road diet, which would eliminate the additional merging lane for eastbound left turns off of Corliss Dr. The addition of a signal at Corliss Dr dramatically improves delay at that intersection while slightly increasing delay along Moraga Road.

Delay is reduced at the intersection of Moraga Road with Ascot Dr intersection due to operational changes in the signal system.

At the intersection of Moraga Road and Donald Dr, the delay is reduced in the AM peak by 10 s/veh. In the PM peak, delay increases by about 13 s/veh due to the need for southbound traffic to merge into one lane and from the need for northbound through traffic to filters into an auxiliary lane a few hundred feet south of the intersection.

Safety for pedestrians and cyclists will be improved at the intersection of Moraga Road and Corliss Dr intersection by signalizing the existing crosswalk. Safety at the Donald Dr intersection for drivers and pedestrians, particularly in the morning, will be improved by switching to split-phase signalization on Donald Dr.

The road diet option would represent a benefit to safety, both by reducing speeds of motor vehicles and by creating additional dedicated space for cyclists.

It is recommended to move forward with the road diet option between Corliss Dr and Donald Dr. The intersection at Corliss Dr should be programmed for signal installation based on existing traffic conditions, which warrant installation, and the potential safety benefit from reducing the number of sideswipe crashes at that intersection.

The intersections at Devin Dr and Draeger Dr should be analyzed at a future time in order to ascertain whether signals would be warranted as part of a coordinated signal system to better manage queuing. 150

MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA
Appendix A
Collected Traffic Data
151
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Corliss Dr QC JOB #: 16580907
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
710 773
112 598 0
150 150 0 0
0 0.73 0
190 40 0 0
38 623 0
638 661
Peak-Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:10 AM -- 8:25 AM

2.1 2.1

2.7 2 0
2 0 0 0
0 0

0.5 2.5 0 0
0 2.6 0
2 2.4
0 6 2
4 2 4 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 4 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Corliss Dr
(Eastbound)
Corliss Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 6:00 AM 0 6 0 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
6:05 AM 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
6:10 AM 0 9 0 0 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
6:15 AM 0 11 0 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
6:20 AM 0 7 0 0 0 13 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
6:25 AM 0 10 0 0 0 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
6:30 AM 0 13 0 0 0 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
6:35 AM 0 12 0 0 0 7 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
6:40 AM 0 11 0 0 0 5 2 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 24
6:45 AM 0 12 0 0 0 20 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37
6:50 AM 0 13 0 0 0 9 4 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 31
6:55 AM 0 10 0 0 0 11 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 277
7:00 AM 0 14 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 282
7:05 AM 0 13 0 0 0 9 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 297
7:10 AM 0 19 0 0 0 20 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 323
7:15 AM 2 21 0 0 0 21 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 354
7:20 AM 2 23 0 0 0 21 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 385
7:25 AM 1 29 0 0 0 29 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 437
7:30 AM 1 24 0 0 0 22 6 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 59 474
7:35 AM 2 29 0 0 0 18 3 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 63 511
7:40 AM 1 28 0 0 0 30 6 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 560
7:45 AM 1 37 0 0 0 35 3 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 87 610
7:50 AM 1 31 0 0 0 31 11 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 85 664
7:55 AM 0 45 0 0 0 45 9 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 109 744
8:00 AM 4 56 0 0 0 42 5 0 8 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 120 840
8:05 AM 7 57 0 0 0 63 10 0 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 157 970
8:10 AM 9 84 0 0 0 53 15 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 1104
8:15 AM 4 70 0 0 0 93 14 0 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 194 1247
8:20 AM 6 58 0 0 0 52 9 0 31 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 162 1356
8:25 AM 3 51 0 0 0 46 9 0 10 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 127 1413
8:30 AM 1 50 0 0 0 49 15 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 127 1481
8:35 AM 1 47 0 0 0 46 8 0 10 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 115 1533
8:40 AM 1 37 0 0 0 43 4 0 11 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 101 1561
8:45 AM 2 44 0 0 0 25 5 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 87 1561
8:50 AM 2 34 0 0 0 28 5 0 12 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 84 1560
8:55 AM 1 38 0 0 0 46 5 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 99 1550

Page 1 of 2 ends

152
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 76 848 0 0 0 792 152 0 224 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 2132 Heavy Trucks 0 32 0 0 24 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 64
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 8 0 8
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

153
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Corliss Dr QC JOB #: 16580908
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
855 817
144 711 0
166 131 0 0
0 0.82 0
154 23 0 0
22 686 0
734 708
Peak-Hour: 3:00 PM -- 4:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 3:15 PM -- 3:30 PM

0.4 2.2
0 0.4 0

1.2 2.3 0 0
0 0

1.9 0 0 0

9.1 2.2 0

0.4 2.4
0 2 1
2 4 4 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 7 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Corliss Dr
(Eastbound)
Corliss Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:00 PM 3 50 0 0 0 60 12 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141
3:05 PM 1 64 0 0 0 63 11 0 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 155
3:10 PM 2 68 0 0 0 65 15 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 163
3:15 PM 2 84 0 0 0 61 16 0 14 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 181
3:20 PM 2 65 0 0 0 81 19 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 178
3:25 PM 1 56 0 0 0 84 16 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 167
3:30 PM 0 43 0 0 0 59 16 0 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 133
3:35 PM 2 53 0 0 0 39 8 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 113
3:40 PM 0 48 0 0 0 52 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 115
3:45 PM 1 56 0 0 0 56 11 0 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 138
3:50 PM 3 39 0 0 0 46 5 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 105
3:55 PM 5 60 0 0 0 45 8 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 128 1717
4:00 PM 1 56 0 0 0 44 8 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 113 1689
4:05 PM 0 52 0 0 0 33 10 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 102 1636
4:10 PM 4 56 0 0 0 33 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 1579
4:15 PM 1 57 0 0 0 44 10 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 123 1521
4:20 PM 1 53 0 0 0 36 13 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 109 1452
4:25 PM 1 54 0 0 0 54 8 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 125 1410
4:30 PM 3 75 0 0 0 35 10 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 133 1410
4:35 PM 1 50 0 0 0 51 7 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 117 1414
4:40 PM 4 62 0 0 0 62 9 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 146 1445
4:45 PM 4 63 0 0 0 44 10 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 132 1439
4:50 PM 1 58 0 0 0 49 8 0 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 132 1466
4:55 PM 2 53 0 0 0 48 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 1452
5:00 PM 4 52 0 0 0 40 9 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 117 1456
5:05 PM 2 37 0 0 0 39 11 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 101 1455
5:10 PM 2 66 0 0 0 46 13 0 10 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 142 1491
5:15 PM 0 54 0 0 0 45 6 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 113 1481
5:20 PM 0 49 0 0 0 52 7 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 120 1492
5:25 PM 1 46 0 0 0 46 10 0 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 116 1483
5:30 PM 3 42 0 0 0 60 13 0 14 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 136 1486
5:35 PM 1 42 0 0 0 39 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 1467
5:40 PM 1 44 0 0 0 48 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 1426
5:45 PM 0 47 0 0 0 45 11 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 1401
5:50 PM 1 53 0 0 0 43 8 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 116 1385
5:55 PM 0 56 0 0 0 36 11 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 108 1379

Page 1 of 2 ends

154
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 20 820 0 0 0 904 204 0 120 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 2104 Heavy Trucks 8 12 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 32
Buses
Pedestrians 4 0 0 4 8
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

155
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Draeger Dr QC JOB #: 16580905
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
708 780
0 684 24
0 0 24 42
0 0.73 0
0 0 18 39
0 756 15
702 771
Peak-Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:10 AM -- 8:25 AM

3.4 2.2
0 2.8 20.8
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 12.8
0 2.2 0

2.7 2.2
0 1 2
0 0 6 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 7 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Draeger Dr
(Eastbound)
Draeger Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 6:00 AM 0 8 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19
6:05 AM 0 9 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
6:10 AM 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
6:15 AM 0 12 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 21
6:20 AM 0 9 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 24
6:25 AM 0 12 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
6:30 AM 0 16 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 25
6:35 AM 0 18 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 27
6:40 AM 0 16 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
6:45 AM 0 12 0 0 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 34
6:50 AM 0 19 0 0 1 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 35
6:55 AM 0 13 0 0 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 33 291
7:00 AM 0 14 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 28 300
7:05 AM 0 15 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 32 317
7:10 AM 0 21 0 0 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 48 349
7:15 AM 0 24 0 0 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 49 377
7:20 AM 0 27 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 52 405
7:25 AM 0 32 1 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 71 459
7:30 AM 0 31 0 0 3 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 65 499
7:35 AM 0 40 1 0 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 65 537
7:40 AM 0 39 0 0 4 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 80 592
7:45 AM 0 43 1 0 1 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 642
7:50 AM 0 39 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 80 687
7:55 AM 0 57 0 0 3 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 120 774
8:00 AM 0 57 2 0 2 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 106 852
8:05 AM 0 73 2 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 7 0 158 978
8:10 AM 0 99 1 0 1 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 171 1101
8:15 AM 0 75 2 0 7 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 188 1240
8:20 AM 0 87 4 0 2 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 161 1349
8:25 AM 0 64 2 0 2 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 118 1396
8:30 AM 0 57 0 0 2 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 122 1453
8:35 AM 0 57 1 0 2 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 116 1504
8:40 AM 0 48 0 0 2 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 1521
8:45 AM 0 49 1 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 79 1516
8:50 AM 0 45 0 0 2 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 85 1521
8:55 AM 0 45 1 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 94 1495

Page 1 of 2 ends

156
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 1044 28 0 40 908 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 24 0 2080 Heavy Trucks 0 32 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

157
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Draeger Dr QC JOB #: 16580906
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
869 825
0 842 27
0 0 31 48
0 0.81 0
0 0 17 44
0 794 17
859 811
Peak-Hour: 3:00 PM -- 4:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 3:15 PM -- 3:30 PM

0.3 3
0 0.4 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3.1 0

0.3 3.1
0 2 2
0 0 6 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 7 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Draeger Dr
(Eastbound)
Draeger Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:00 PM 0 62 1 0 1 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 138
3:05 PM 0 79 2 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 153
3:10 PM 0 77 2 0 2 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 164
3:15 PM 0 89 2 0 2 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 172
3:20 PM 0 74 3 0 4 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 189
3:25 PM 0 64 1 0 4 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 172
3:30 PM 0 56 2 0 4 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 141
3:35 PM 0 58 3 0 2 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 114
3:40 PM 0 51 1 0 2 57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 113
3:45 PM 0 63 0 0 2 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 0 138
3:50 PM 0 59 0 0 1 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 112
3:55 PM 0 62 0 0 3 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 122 1728
4:00 PM 0 66 0 0 3 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 122 1712
4:05 PM 0 54 3 0 2 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 109 1668
4:10 PM 0 58 0 0 3 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 107 1611
4:15 PM 0 72 0 0 3 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 130 1569
4:20 PM 0 49 2 0 4 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 104 1484
4:25 PM 0 57 3 0 4 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 134 1446
4:30 PM 0 77 3 0 3 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 129 1434
4:35 PM 0 62 1 0 2 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 124 1444
4:40 PM 0 66 1 0 2 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 142 1473
4:45 PM 0 68 1 0 2 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 123 1458
4:50 PM 0 68 1 0 2 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 128 1474
4:55 PM 0 63 3 0 3 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 128 1480
5:00 PM 0 58 2 0 1 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 113 1471
5:05 PM 0 42 1 0 5 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 101 1463
5:10 PM 0 75 2 0 3 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 138 1494
5:15 PM 0 54 3 0 4 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 113 1477
5:20 PM 0 60 3 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 121 1494
5:25 PM 0 57 1 0 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114 1474
5:30 PM 0 54 2 0 2 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 130 1475
5:35 PM 0 49 0 0 1 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 95 1446
5:40 PM 0 49 0 0 4 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 107 1411
5:45 PM 0 46 0 0 3 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 108 1396
5:50 PM 0 63 0 0 1 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 117 1385
5:55 PM 0 56 3 0 4 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 111 1368

Page 1 of 2 ends

158
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 0 908 24 0 40 1112 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 32 0 2132 Heavy Trucks 0 28 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 0 4 4
Bicycles 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

159
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Donald Dr QC JOB #: 16580903
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
774 916
138 629 7
221 132 13 43
15 0.69 25
231 84 5 27
58 771 5
718 834
Peak-Hour: 7:50 AM -- 8:50 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:10 AM -- 8:25 AM
3 2.2

2.9 3 0

1.8 0 0 0
0 0

1.3 3.6 0 0
0 2.6 0

3.1 2.4
9 8 7
0 0 1 1
0 5
0 0
3 0
1 1 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Donald Dr
(Eastbound)
Donald Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 6:00 AM 0 8 0 0 0 8 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 22
6:05 AM 0 9 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
6:10 AM 1 10 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 17
6:15 AM 2 9 0 0 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
6:20 AM 1 12 0 0 0 12 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 29
6:25 AM 0 9 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
6:30 AM 1 16 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 28
6:35 AM 0 20 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 30
6:40 AM 2 13 1 0 0 8 1 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 30
6:45 AM 0 17 0 0 1 18 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 43
6:50 AM 0 19 0 0 0 17 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 42
6:55 AM 0 17 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 30 321
7:00 AM 0 16 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 28 327
7:05 AM 1 20 0 0 1 11 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 37 350
7:10 AM 0 21 0 0 0 31 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 390
7:15 AM 4 21 0 0 0 18 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 46 414
7:20 AM 0 31 1 0 0 26 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 63 448
7:25 AM 1 36 0 0 0 33 2 0 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 81 515
7:30 AM 1 29 0 0 0 26 3 0 3 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 67 554
7:35 AM 1 45 1 0 0 14 2 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 72 596
7:40 AM 2 36 0 0 0 38 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 80 646
7:45 AM 2 36 0 0 1 38 7 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 90 693
7:50 AM 5 51 0 0 0 35 3 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 100 751
7:55 AM 2 56 0 0 1 57 9 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 136 857
8:00 AM 3 57 0 0 1 40 8 0 3 0 3 0 0 2 3 0 120 949
8:05 AM 10 77 0 0 2 68 22 0 4 0 5 0 1 4 0 0 193 1105
8:10 AM 9 99 1 0 0 73 23 0 17 2 11 0 1 5 4 0 245 1293
8:15 AM 13 75 1 0 0 72 20 0 18 2 19 0 1 8 3 0 232 1479
8:20 AM 7 79 0 0 0 49 23 0 21 4 18 0 0 4 0 0 205 1621
8:25 AM 6 62 3 0 2 54 11 0 30 5 8 0 0 2 1 0 184 1724
8:30 AM 2 53 0 0 1 57 5 0 15 2 9 0 0 0 1 0 145 1802
8:35 AM 1 56 0 0 0 51 7 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 125 1855
8:40 AM 0 55 0 0 0 41 4 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 106 1881
8:45 AM 0 51 0 0 0 32 3 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 1882
8:50 AM 1 41 1 0 0 35 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 85 1867
8:55 AM 3 41 0 0 0 42 5 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 97 1828

Page 1 of 2 ends

160
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 116 1012 8 0 0 776 264 0 224 32 192 0 8 68 28 0 2728 Heavy Trucks 0 24 0 0 24 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 60
Buses
Pedestrians 0 4 4 4 12
Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

161
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Donald Dr QC JOB #: 16580904
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
920 863
50 861 9
100 67 7 11
3 0.81 2
110 40 2 15
48 789 3
903 840
Peak-Hour: 3:00 PM -- 4:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 3:15 PM -- 3:30 PM

0.5 1.9
0 0.6 0
2 4.5 0 0
0 0

2.7 0 0 0

4.2 1.6 0

0.6 1.8
6 6 2
0 5 0 0
1 4
0 0
1 0
0 2 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Donald Dr
(Eastbound)
Donald Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:00 PM 3 54 0 0 0 65 6 0 10 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 149
3:05 PM 1 79 1 0 0 67 5 0 4 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 165
3:10 PM 2 85 0 0 3 91 7 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 193
3:15 PM 4 83 0 0 2 83 5 0 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 187
3:20 PM 11 66 0 0 0 83 4 0 15 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 184
3:25 PM 3 75 0 0 0 116 6 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 206
3:30 PM 5 48 0 0 2 73 5 0 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 145
3:35 PM 4 58 1 0 0 55 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 125
3:40 PM 5 52 0 0 1 60 3 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 127
3:45 PM 2 64 1 0 1 56 4 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 133
3:50 PM 5 64 0 0 0 54 1 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 136
3:55 PM 3 61 0 0 0 58 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 131 1881
4:00 PM 2 60 0 0 1 48 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 116 1848
4:05 PM 1 65 0 0 1 38 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 112 1795
4:10 PM 1 59 0 0 0 46 6 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 115 1717
4:15 PM 2 72 0 0 0 61 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 143 1673
4:20 PM 5 50 1 0 1 58 3 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 128 1617
4:25 PM 2 53 0 0 1 58 5 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 127 1538
4:30 PM 3 71 1 0 1 55 5 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 143 1536
4:35 PM 2 67 0 0 1 48 5 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 135 1546
4:40 PM 5 65 0 0 1 56 5 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 141 1560
4:45 PM 3 66 0 0 0 52 2 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 132 1559
4:50 PM 1 68 1 0 0 63 4 0 12 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 156 1579
4:55 PM 3 60 1 0 3 48 5 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 131 1579
5:00 PM 2 61 1 0 0 54 7 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 130 1593
5:05 PM 3 46 0 0 1 45 4 0 3 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 108 1589
5:10 PM 2 66 1 0 1 54 2 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 133 1607
5:15 PM 1 54 0 0 1 59 8 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 129 1593
5:20 PM 5 63 1 0 1 56 15 0 7 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 151 1616
5:25 PM 1 60 0 0 0 57 5 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 135 1624
5:30 PM 2 46 0 0 1 59 9 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 122 1603
5:35 PM 3 47 0 0 1 53 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 113 1581
5:40 PM 1 60 0 0 1 50 6 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 125 1565
5:45 PM 1 40 1 0 1 50 6 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 105 1538
5:50 PM 1 66 1 0 3 56 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 1515
5:55 PM 1 53 0 0 5 54 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 1501

Page 1 of 2 ends

162
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 72 896 0 0 8 1128 60 0 84 4 48 0 4 0 4 0 2308 Heavy Trucks 4 8 0 0 12 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 28
Buses
Pedestrians 0 20 4 4 28
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 12
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

163
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Ascot Dr QC JOB #: 16580901
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
760 1001
65 683 12
106 121 22 34
3 0.74 1
198 74 11 39
40 858 24
768 922
Peak-Hour: 7:50 AM -- 8:50 AM
Peak 15-Min: 8:05 AM -- 8:20 AM

2.4 1.8

1.5 2.5 0

1.9 0.8 9.1 8.8

33.3 0
1 0 9.1 10.3

2.5 1.7 12.5

2.3 2.1
8 9 5
0 1 2 0
6 0
0 0
0 0
1 5 1
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Ascot Dr
(Eastbound)
Ascot Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 6:00 AM 0 11 1 0 0 9 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
6:05 AM 0 8 0 0 0 3 1 0 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 19
6:10 AM 0 11 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 22
6:15 AM 1 8 0 0 1 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 23
6:20 AM 1 9 1 0 1 8 1 0 4 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 31
6:25 AM 0 11 1 0 0 5 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 24
6:30 AM 1 18 1 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 34
6:35 AM 0 18 1 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 30
6:40 AM 0 19 1 0 0 9 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 35
6:45 AM 0 19 2 0 1 13 1 0 2 2 5 0 0 0 1 0 46
6:50 AM 0 20 1 0 2 19 1 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 51
6:55 AM 0 17 3 0 1 6 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 5 0 35 375
7:00 AM 0 15 0 0 0 11 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 37 387
7:05 AM 0 21 0 0 5 12 1 0 6 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 49 417
7:10 AM 1 19 0 0 1 31 1 0 5 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 63 458
7:15 AM 0 25 1 0 0 23 4 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 497
7:20 AM 0 33 1 0 2 23 6 0 10 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 78 544
7:25 AM 1 39 3 0 1 27 0 0 11 1 2 0 5 0 1 0 91 611
7:30 AM 0 34 1 0 0 22 1 0 8 0 3 0 2 0 1 0 72 649
7:35 AM 1 43 0 0 1 12 2 0 12 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 75 694
7:40 AM 0 41 0 0 1 27 2 0 11 1 8 0 2 1 1 0 95 754
7:45 AM 2 37 0 0 4 28 3 0 19 1 16 0 2 0 1 0 113 821
7:50 AM 3 52 2 0 0 35 5 0 10 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 115 885
7:55 AM 1 58 2 0 2 62 7 0 6 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 145 995
8:00 AM 2 56 2 0 0 39 3 0 13 0 4 0 1 1 1 0 122 1080
8:05 AM 1 75 1 0 3 83 7 0 8 0 6 0 1 0 2 0 187 1218
8:10 AM 2 110 5 0 0 84 10 0 10 1 14 0 3 0 1 0 240 1395
8:15 AM 3 97 1 0 1 83 10 0 9 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 217 1550
8:20 AM 2 83 1 0 2 58 7 0 15 0 6 0 1 0 2 0 177 1649
8:25 AM 5 103 3 0 1 55 3 0 9 0 8 0 1 0 3 0 191 1749
8:30 AM 10 57 2 0 0 58 2 0 13 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 149 1826
8:35 AM 4 59 2 0 1 56 2 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 133 1884
8:40 AM 3 53 1 0 0 37 4 0 12 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 116 1905
8:45 AM 4 55 2 0 2 33 5 0 12 1 4 0 0 0 4 0 122 1914
8:50 AM 1 44 2 0 1 27 7 0 3 0 4 0 2 1 1 0 93 1892
8:55 AM 4 39 1 0 1 44 1 0 7 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 103 1850

Page 1 of 2 ends

164
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 24 1128 28 0 16 1000 108 0 108 4 132 0 16 0 12 0 2576 Heavy Trucks 0 4 4 0 20 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 36
Buses
Pedestrians 0 8 8 4 20
Bicycles 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 16
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

165
Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Moraga Rd -- Ascot Dr QC JOB #: 16580902
CITY/STATE: Moraga, CA DATE: Wed, May 22 2024
998 884
99 880 19
160 76 20 32
6 0.83 2
119 37 10 39
59 788 14
927 861
Peak-Hour: 3:00 PM -- 4:00 PM
Peak 15-Min: 3:15 PM -- 3:30 PM

0.6 1.8
1 0.6 0

0.6 0 10 6.3
0 0
0 0 0 5.1
0 1.8 14.3

0.5 1.9
1 15 2
0 3 4 0
2 0
0 0
1 0
0 3 0
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
N/A

N/A N/A
N/A
5-Min Count
Period
Beginning At
Moraga Rd
(Northbound)
Moraga Rd
(Southbound)
Ascot Dr
(Eastbound)
Ascot Dr
(Westbound) Total Hourly
Totals
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 3:00 PM 7 57 2 0 1 69 5 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 152
3:05 PM 2 81 0 0 0 65 7 0 9 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 171
3:10 PM 8 74 0 0 0 98 11 0 4 0 8 0 1 0 4 0 208
3:15 PM 4 80 1 0 2 86 11 0 6 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 194
3:20 PM 11 74 0 0 3 90 8 0 8 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 202
3:25 PM 3 65 5 0 1 114 12 0 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 212
3:30 PM 7 59 0 0 4 82 12 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 176
3:35 PM 1 51 2 0 3 48 4 0 4 2 4 0 3 1 0 0 123
3:40 PM 2 54 3 0 1 61 6 0 9 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 142
3:45 PM 9 57 1 0 2 56 8 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 142
3:50 PM 2 70 0 0 1 55 9 0 6 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 149
3:55 PM 3 66 0 0 1 56 6 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 139 2010
4:00 PM 5 51 3 0 3 42 8 0 4 1 5 0 2 0 0 0 124 1982
4:05 PM 4 60 2 0 4 44 13 0 6 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 140 1951
4:10 PM 2 56 2 0 1 40 10 0 6 0 3 0 1 1 4 0 126 1869
4:15 PM 5 56 5 0 0 62 12 0 7 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 153 1828
4:20 PM 6 57 2 0 1 61 5 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 142 1768
4:25 PM 1 61 1 0 0 56 6 0 7 0 2 0 0 1 4 0 139 1695
4:30 PM 1 63 5 0 2 60 9 0 8 0 3 0 1 0 2 0 154 1673
4:35 PM 3 69 3 0 2 48 4 0 8 0 7 0 0 1 7 0 152 1702
4:40 PM 4 61 3 0 1 67 10 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 0 152 1712
4:45 PM 3 70 0 0 1 48 9 0 7 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 144 1714
4:50 PM 4 77 3 0 1 60 11 0 6 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 167 1732
4:55 PM 6 54 3 0 0 48 11 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2 0 134 1727
5:00 PM 6 63 2 0 1 58 7 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 146 1749
5:05 PM 4 44 2 0 1 53 8 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 117 1726
5:10 PM 3 67 2 0 1 59 12 0 7 1 3 0 2 0 3 0 160 1760
5:15 PM 2 49 5 0 2 50 6 0 7 0 5 0 1 0 3 0 130 1737
5:20 PM 3 64 2 0 1 75 14 0 7 0 2 0 0 1 4 0 173 1768
5:25 PM 2 61 1 0 2 56 8 0 6 1 4 0 2 1 5 0 149 1778
5:30 PM 3 45 0 0 4 67 12 0 4 1 2 0 2 1 1 0 142 1766
5:35 PM 3 47 1 0 1 50 18 0 7 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 133 1747
5:40 PM 4 56 2 0 1 55 16 0 10 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 152 1747
5:45 PM 4 40 2 0 1 62 7 0 10 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 132 1735
5:50 PM 4 62 1 0 1 53 10 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 141 1709
5:55 PM 3 55 2 0 1 59 13 0 6 1 5 0 0 0 2 0 147 1722

Page 1 of 2 ends

166
Peak 15-Min
Flowrates
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Total
Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U All Vehicles 72 876 24 0 24 1160 124 0 96 8 20 0 4 0 24 0 2432 Heavy Trucks 0 16 4 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
Buses
Pedestrians 0 0 12 8 20
Bicycles 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Scooters
Comments:

Report generated on 5/28/2024 3:42 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212

Page 2 of 2 ends

167
168
169
170
171
172
173

MEMORANDUM
Alta Planning + Design, Inc. Town of Moraga, CA
Appendix B
Current Year (2024) Existing Conditions Synchro Outputs 174
HCM 7th TWSC
4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 93.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 149 41 39 630 588 114
Future Vol, veh/h 149 41 39 630 588 114
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 100 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 74 74 74 74 74 74
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 201 55 53 851 795 154
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1755 803 953 0 - 0
Stage 1 799 - - - - -
Stage 2 957 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 94 384 721 - - -
Stage 1 443 - - - - -
Stage 2 373 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 86 381 719 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 86 - - - - -
Stage 1 409 - - - - -
Stage 2 372 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v $ 762.66 0.61 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 719 - 103 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.073 - 2.486 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.4 -$ 762.7 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - 23.3 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 175
HCM 7th Edition TWSC
-Pedestrians
4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Approach
Approach Direction NB
Median Present? No
Marked Crosswalk? Yes
RRFB? Yes
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 555.14
Level of ServiceF
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.203
Crossing Level of ServiceC
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 44
Lanes Crossed2
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 1218
Yield Rate(%)0
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 15.57
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.93
Prob of Delayed Crossing 0.99
Delay for adq Gap (s) 558.02
Avg Ped Delay (s) 555.14
Approach
Approach Direction SB
Median Present? No
Marked Crosswalk? No
RRFB? No
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 1808.02
Level of ServiceF
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.828
Crossing Level of ServiceF
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 56
Lanes Crossed2
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 1218
Yield Rate(%)0
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 19.00
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.96
Prob of Delayed Crossing 1.00
Delay for adq Gap (s) 1810.94
Avg Ped Delay (s) 1808.02
176
HCM 7th TWSC
7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 25 762 15 23 673
Future Vol, veh/h 18 25 762 15 23 673
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 2 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 25 34 1044 21 32 922
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1580 534 0 0 1066 0
Stage 1 1056 - - - - -
Stage 2 524 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 100 490 - - 649 -
Stage 1 296 - - - - -
Stage 2 559 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 489 - - 648 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 - - - - -
Stage 1 295 - - - - -
Stage 2 522 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v35.44 0 1

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 176 119 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.335 0.049 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 35.4 10.8 0.7
HCM Lane LOS - - E B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.4 0.2 -
177
HCM 7th Edition TWSC
-Pedestrians
7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Approach
Approach Direction NB
Median Present? Yes
Marked Crosswalk? No
RRFB? No
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 34.75
Level of ServiceE
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.461
Crossing Level of ServiceE
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 12 29
Lanes Crossed21
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 762 673
Yield Rate(%)00
Ped Platooning No No
Critical Headway (s) 6.43 11.29
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.49 0.88
Prob of Delayed Crossing 0.74 0.88
Delay for adq Gap (s) 9.77 31.27
Avg Ped Delay (s) 7.27 27.48
Approach
Approach Direction SB
Median Present? Yes
Marked Crosswalk? No
RRFB? No
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 41.50
Level of ServiceE
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.463
Crossing Level of ServiceE
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 12 29
Lanes Crossed22
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 673 762
Yield Rate(%)00
Ped Platooning No No
Critical Headway (s) 6.43 11.29
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.45 0.70
Prob of Delayed Crossing 0.70 0.91
Delay for adq Gap (s) 8.60 39.07
Avg Ped Delay (s) 6.01 35.49
178
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 132 15 84 5 25 13 58 771 5 7 629 138 Future Volume (vph) 132 15 84 5 25 13 58 771 5 7 629 138 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1745 1583 1753 1770 3535 1770 3416
Flt Permitted 0.70 1.00 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1292 1583 1703 1770 3535 1770 3416
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Adj. Flow (vph) 189 21 120 7 36 19 83 1101 7 10 899 197 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 96 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 13 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 210 24 0 48 0 83 1108 0 10 1083 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 8 7 7 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 23.8 23.8 23.8 8.9 77.3 1.3 67.7
Effective Green, g (s) 23.8 23.8 23.8 8.9 77.3 1.3 67.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.07 0.64 0.01 0.56
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 256 313 337 131 2277 19 1927
v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.31 0.01 c0.32
v/s Ratio Perm c0.16 0.02 0.03
v/c Ratio 0.82 0.07 0.14 0.63 0.48 0.52 0.56
Uniform Delay, d1 46.0 39.1 39.6 53.9 11.0 59.0 16.6
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.69
Incremental Delay, d2 18.5 0.1 0.1 7.1 0.7 10.5 1.0
Delay (s) 64.6 39.2 39.8 61.1 11.8 71.2 29.3
Level of Service E D D E B E C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 55.4 39.8 15.2 29.7
Approach LOS E D B C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 26.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
179
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 121 3 74 11 1 22 40 858 24 12 683 65 Future Volume (vph) 121 3 74 11 1 22 40 858 24 12 683 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1776 1583 1631 1770 3522 1770 3479
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1776 1583 1631 1770 3522 1770 3479
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Adj. Flow (vph) 164 4 100 15 1 30 54 1159 32 16 923 88
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 86 0 27 0 0 1 0 0 4 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 168 14 0 19 0 54 1190 0 16 1007 0 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 9 5 5 9
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 2
Turn Type Split NA Perm Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 3 8 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 16.6 16.6 11.1 6.2 65.5 2.8 64.1
Effective Green, g (s) 16.6 16.6 11.1 6.2 65.5 2.8 64.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.05 0.55 0.02 0.53
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 245 218 150 91 1922 41 1858
v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 c0.01 0.03 c0.34 0.01 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.01
v/c Ratio 0.68 0.06 0.12 0.59 0.61 0.39 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 49.2 44.9 49.9 55.6 18.6 57.7 18.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.29 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 7.7 0.1 0.3 5.9 1.3 2.2 1.1
Delay (s) 56.9 45.0 50.3 60.8 25.5 59.9 19.4
Level of Service E D D E C E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 52.5 50.3 27.1 20.0
Approach LOS D D C C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 24.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
180
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 149 41 39 630 588 114
Future Volume (vph) 149 41 39 630 588 114
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.971 0.850
Flt Protected 0.962 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1740 0 1770 1863 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.962 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1740 0 1770 1863 1863 1583
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 188 238 831
Travel Time (s) 4.3 5.4 9.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74
Adj. Flow (vph) 201 55 53 851 795 154
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 256 0 53 851 795 154
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
181
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 18 25 762 15 23 673
Future Volume (vph) 18 25 762 15 23 673
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.922 0.997
Flt Protected 0.979 0.998
Satd. Flow (prot) 1681 0 3529 0 0 3356
Flt Permitted 0.979 0.998
Satd. Flow (perm) 1681 0 3529 0 0 3356
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 165 831 1562
Travel Time (s) 3.8 9.8 16.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73
Parking (#/hr) 0
Adj. Flow (vph) 25 34 1044 21 32 922
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 0 1065 0 0 954
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.07
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
182
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 132 15 84 5 25 13 58 771 5 7 629 138 Future Volume (vph) 132 15 84 5 25 13 58 771 5 7 629 138 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 125 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 70 65
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.959 0.999 0.973
Flt Protected 0.957 0.994 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1783 1583 0 1753 0 1770 3535 0 1770 3416 0 Flt Permitted 0.709 0.966 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1293 1583 0 1704 0 1760 3535 0 1762 3416 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 120 17 1 29
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 243 192 1562 457
Travel Time (s) 5.5 4.4 35.5 10.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 9 8 7 7 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Adj. Flow (vph) 189 21 120 7 36 19 83 1101 7 10 899 197 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 210 120 0 62 0 83 1108 0 10 1096 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
183
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Lane Group Ø3
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Adj. Flow (vph)
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Enter Blocked Intersection
Lane Alignment
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor
Turning Speed (mph)
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Detector 2 Position(ft)
Detector 2 Size(ft)
Detector 2 Type
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s)
184
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 5 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 4
Detector Phase 4 4 4 4 4 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 Minimum Split (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 11.0 26.0 9.0 26.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 24.0 67.0 19.0 62.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 20.0% 55.8% 15.8% 51.7% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 18.0 61.0 15.0 56.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max None C-Max Walk Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 8.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 12.0 12.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 9 9 9 9 9 7 8
Act Effct Green (s) 23.8 23.8 23.8 10.0 82.9 5.5 71.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.69 0.05 0.60
v/c Ratio 0.82 0.29 0.17 0.56 0.45 0.12 0.53
Control Delay (s/veh) 70.6 8.7 30.3 66.8 10.2 59.2 28.6 Queue Delay 30.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9
Total Delay (s/veh) 101.2 8.7 30.5 66.8 10.3 59.2 31.5

LOS F A C E B E C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 67.6 30.6 14.3 31.8
Approach LOS E C B C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 40 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 28.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr
185
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 6 ends

Lane Group Ø3
Turn Type
Protected Phases 3
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 3.0
Minimum Split (s) 6.0
Total Split (s) 6.0
Total Split (%) 5%
Maximum Green (s) 3.0
Yellow Time (s) 2.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2
Recall Mode None
Walk Time (s) 2.8
Flash Dont Walk (s) 0.2
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 9
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay (s/veh)
Queue Delay
Total Delay (s/veh)
LOS
Approach Delay (s/veh)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
186
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 7 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 121 3 74 11 1 22 40 858 24 12 683 65 Future Volume (vph) 121 3 74 11 1 22 40 858 24 12 683 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 140 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 50 60
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.912 0.996 0.987
Flt Protected 0.953 0.984 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1775 1583 0 1647 0 1770 3522 0 1770 3479 0 Flt Permitted 0.953 0.984 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1755 1583 0 1647 0 1758 3522 0 1766 3479 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 191 30 2 9
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 148 102 457 336
Travel Time (s) 3.4 2.3 10.4 7.6
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 8 9 5 5 9
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Adj. Flow (vph) 164 4 100 15 1 30 54 1159 32 16 923 88
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 168 100 0 46 0 54 1191 0 16 1011 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
187
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 8 ends

Lane Group Ø3 Ø8
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)
Future Volume (vph)
Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Storage Length (ft)
Storage Lanes
Taper Length (ft)
Lane Util. Factor
Ped Bike Factor
Frt
Flt Protected
Satd. Flow (prot)
Flt Permitted
Satd. Flow (perm)
Right Turn on Red
Satd. Flow (RTOR)
Link Speed (mph)
Link Distance (ft)
Travel Time (s)
Confl. Peds. (#/hr)
Confl. Bikes (#/hr)
Peak Hour Factor
Adj. Flow (vph)
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph)
Enter Blocked Intersection
Lane Alignment
Median Width(ft)
Link Offset(ft)
Crosswalk Width(ft)
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor
Turning Speed (mph)
Number of Detectors
Detector Template
Leading Detector (ft)
Trailing Detector (ft)
Detector 1 Position(ft)
Detector 1 Size(ft)
Detector 1 Type
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s)
Detector 1 Queue (s)
Detector 1 Delay (s)
Detector 2 Position(ft)
Detector 2 Size(ft)
Detector 2 Type
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s)
188
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 9 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Turn Type Split NA Perm Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 3 8 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4
Detector Phase 4 4 4 3 8 3 8 5 2 1 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.0 38.0 12.0 27.0
Total Split (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 13.0 46.0 13.0 46.0
Total Split (%) 22.5% 22.5% 22.5% 10.8% 38.3% 10.8% 38.3% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 9.0 40.0 7.0 40.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 4.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Recall Mode None None None None C-Max None C-Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 25.0 14.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 5 9
Act Effct Green (s) 16.6 16.6 13.0 7.4 70.8 6.4 66.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.06 0.59 0.05 0.56
v/c Ratio 0.68 0.26 0.22 0.49 0.57 0.17 0.52
Control Delay (s/veh) 63.0 1.6 15.7 67.3 26.5 58.2 22.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2
Total Delay (s/veh) 63.0 1.7 15.8 67.3 27.3 58.2 22.5

LOS E A B E C E C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 40.2 15.9 29.1 23.1
Approach LOS D B C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 120
Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 95
Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69
Intersection Signal Delay (s/veh): 27.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr 189
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak 7:50 am 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 10 ends

Lane Group Ø3 Ø8
Turn Type
Protected Phases 3 8
Permitted Phases
Detector Phase
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0
Minimum Split (s) 8.0 26.0
Total Split (s) 8.0 26.0
Total Split (%) 7% 22%
Maximum Green (s) 4.0 22.0
Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s)
Total Lost Time (s)
Lead/Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None
Walk Time (s) 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 15.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 8
Act Effct Green (s)
Actuated g/C Ratio
v/c Ratio
Control Delay (s/veh)
Queue Delay
Total Delay (s/veh)
LOS
Approach Delay (s/veh)
Approach LOS
Intersection Summary
190
SimTraffic Simulation Summary
Baseline 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak SimTraffic Report

Page 1 ends

Summary of All Intervals
Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg
Start Time 7:40 7:40 7:40 7:40 7:40 7:40
End Time 8:50 8:50 8:50 8:50 8:50 8:50
Total Time (min) 70 70 70 70 70 70
Time Recorded (min) 60 60 60 60 60 60
# of Intervals 2 2 2 2 2 2
# of Recorded Intervals 1 1 1 1 1 1
Vehs Entered 2157 2208 2227 2164 2178 2187
Vehs Exited 2168 2214 2232 2171 2172 2193
Starting Vehs 58 52 50 61 54 52
Ending Vehs 47 46 45 54 60 47
Travel Distance (mi) 1013 1051 1043 1022 1007 1027
Travel Time (hr) 52.8 55.5 55.3 52.9 53.4 54.0
Total Delay (hr) 17.1 18.5 18.5 16.8 17.8 17.7
Total Stops 1689 1827 1792 1645 1834 1757
Fuel Used (gal) 38.6 40.3 40.0 38.7 38.9 39.3
Interval #0 Information Seeding
Start Time 7:40
End Time 7:50
Total Time (min) 10
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

No data recorded this interval.

Interval #1 Information Recording
Start Time 7:50
End Time 8:50
Total Time (min) 60
Volumes adjusted by Growth Factors.

Run Number 1 2 3 4 5 Avg
Vehs Entered 2157 2208 2227 2164 2178 2187
Vehs Exited 2168 2214 2232 2171 2172 2193
Starting Vehs 58 52 50 61 54 52
Ending Vehs 47 46 45 54 60 47
Travel Distance (mi) 1013 1051 1043 1022 1007 1027
Travel Time (hr) 52.8 55.5 55.3 52.9 53.4 54.0
Total Delay (hr) 17.1 18.5 18.5 16.8 17.8 17.7
Total Stops 1689 1827 1792 1645 1834 1757
Fuel Used (gal) 38.6 40.3 40.0 38.7 38.9 39.3
191
SimTraffic Performance Report
Baseline 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak SimTraffic Report

Page 2 ends

4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr Performance by movement
7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr Performance by movement
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr Performance by movement
15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr Performance by movement Total Network Performance
192
Queuing and Blocking Report
Baseline 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak SimTraffic Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection: 4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr
Movement EB NB NB SB SB
Directions Served LR L T T R
Maximum Queue (ft) 162 48 47 74 13
Average Queue (ft) 77 16 3 4 1
95th Queue (ft) 139 43 24 32 10
Link Distance (ft) 148 214 768 768
Upstream Blk Time (%) 2
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 100
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr
Movement WB SB SB
Directions Served LR LT T
Maximum Queue (ft) 67 164 102
Average Queue (ft) 29 24 4
95th Queue (ft) 57 89 42
Link Distance (ft) 115 1493 1493
Upstream Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Storage Bay Dist (ft)
Storage Blk Time (%)
Queuing Penalty (veh)
Intersection: 12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 200 81 91 112 152 160 137 266 274
Average Queue (ft) 104 33 28 50 67 79 9 152 133
95th Queue (ft) 182 63 69 100 128 143 60 253 238
Link Distance (ft) 196 196 146 1493 1493 390 390
Upstream Blk Time (%) 1
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 125 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 1 15
Queuing Penalty (veh) 2 0 1
193
Queuing and Blocking Report
Baseline 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak SimTraffic Report

Page 4 ends

Intersection: 15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr
Movement EB EB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB
Directions Served LT R LTR L T TR L T TR
Maximum Queue (ft) 116 58 63 161 241 247 72 269 236
Average Queue (ft) 84 29 26 36 80 91 13 108 81
95th Queue (ft) 128 53 55 92 189 202 45 219 178
Link Distance (ft) 101 101 55 390 390 307 307
Upstream Blk Time (%) 12 3 0
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 0 0
Storage Bay Dist (ft) 140 100
Storage Blk Time (%) 0 4 9
Queuing Penalty (veh) 0 1 1
Network Summary
Network wide Queuing Penalty: 6
194
Actuated Signals, Observed Splits
Baseline 06/20/2024
2024 Base AM Peak SimTraffic Report

Page 5 ends

Intersection: 12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6
Movement(s) Served SBL NBT Hold EBWB NBL SBT
Maximum Green (s) 15.0 61.0 3.0 24.0 18.0 56.0
Minimum Green (s) 5.0 20.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 20.0
Recall None C-Max None None None C-Max
Avg. Green (s) 5.7 2.0 0.0 19.1 7.8 -7.2
g/C Ratio NA NA 0.00 NA NA NA
Cycles Skipped (%) 89 0 100 0 17 0
Cycles @ Minimum (%) 7 0 0 0 28 0
Cycles Maxed Out (%) 0 100 0 7 0 100
Cycles with Peds (%) 0 17 0 36 0 21
Controller Summary
Average Cycle Length (s): -15.6
Number of Complete Cycles : 29
Intersection: 15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr
Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 8
Movement(s) Served SBL NBT WBTL EBTL NBL SBT WBTL
Maximum Green (s) 7.0 40.0 4.0 23.0 9.0 40.0 22.0
Minimum Green (s) 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0
Recall None C-Max None None None C-Max None
Avg. Green (s) 7.4 -5.1 4.0 13.4 6.7 -8.7 21.2
g/C Ratio NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Cycles Skipped (%) 71 0 76 0 28 0 75
Cycles @ Minimum (%) 0 0 24 0 48 0 0
Cycles Maxed Out (%) 29 100 24 0 0 100 0
Cycles with Peds (%) 0 14 0 0 0 29 21
Controller Summary
Average Cycle Length (s): -15.6
Number of Complete Cycles : 29
195
HCM 7th TWSC
4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 45.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 131 23 22 686 711 144
Future Vol, veh/h 131 23 22 686 711 144
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 2
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - 100 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 82 82 82 82 82 82
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 160 28 27 837 867 176
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1759 871 1045 0 - 0
Stage 1 869 - - - - -
Stage 2 890 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 93 350 666 - - -
Stage 1 410 - - - - -
Stage 2 401 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 89 349 665 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 89 - - - - -
Stage 1 393 - - - - -
Stage 2 400 - - - - -
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v $ 501.64 0.33 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 665 - 100 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.04 - 1.877 - -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 10.6 -$ 501.6 - -
HCM Lane LOS B - F - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 15.5 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 196
HCM 7th Edition TWSC
-Pedestrians
4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Approach
Approach Direction NB
Median Present? No
Marked Crosswalk? Yes
RRFB? Yes
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 1066.69
Level of ServiceF
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.220
Crossing Level of ServiceC
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 44
Lanes Crossed2
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 1397
Yield Rate(%)0
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 15.57
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.95
Prob of Delayed Crossing 1.00
Delay for adq Gap (s) 1069.23
Avg Ped Delay (s) 1066.69
Approach
Approach Direction SB
Median Present? No
Marked Crosswalk? No
RRFB? No
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 4082.20
Level of ServiceF
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.842
Crossing Level of ServiceF
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 56
Lanes Crossed2
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 1397
Yield Rate(%)0
Ped Platooning No
Critical Headway (s) 19.00
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.97
Prob of Delayed Crossing 1.00
Delay for adq Gap (s) 4084.76
Avg Ped Delay (s) 4082.20
197
HCM 7th TWSC
7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 31 794 17 27 842
Future Vol, veh/h 17 31 794 17 27 842
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 2 2 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 - - - - -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 81 81 81 81 81 81
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 21 38 980 21 33 1040
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1579 503 0 0 1003 0
Stage 1 993 - - - - -
Stage 2 586 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy 6.84 6.94 - - 4.14 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.84 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.84 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.52 3.32 - - 2.22 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 100 514 - - 686 -
Stage 1 319 - - - - -
Stage 2 519 - - - - -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 93 513 - - 685 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 93 - - - - -
Stage 1 319 - - - - -
Stage 2 484 - - - - -
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v30.91 0 0.98

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 197 112 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.3 0.049 -
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 30.9 10.5 0.7
HCM Lane LOS - - D B A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 1.2 0.2 -
198
HCM 7th Edition TWSC
-Pedestrians
7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

Approach
Approach Direction NB
Median Present? Yes
Marked Crosswalk? No
RRFB? No
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 52.08
Level of ServiceF
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.502
Crossing Level of ServiceF
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 12 29
Lanes Crossed21
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 794 842
Yield Rate(%)00
Ped Platooning No No
Critical Headway (s) 6.43 11.29
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.51 0.93
Prob of Delayed Crossing 0.76 0.93
Delay for adq Gap (s) 10.23 47.74
Avg Ped Delay (s) 7.75 44.33
Approach
Approach Direction SB
Median Present? Yes
Marked Crosswalk? No
RRFB? No
K-Factor 0.08
Approach Delay(s) 47.34
Level of ServiceF
Average Dissatisfaction Prob 0.502
Crossing Level of ServiceF
Crosswalk
Length (ft) 12 29
Lanes Crossed22
Veh Vol Crossed (veh/h) 842 794
Yield Rate(%)00
Ped Platooning No No
Critical Headway (s) 6.43 11.29
Prob of Blocked Lane 0.53 0.71
Prob of Delayed Crossing 0.78 0.92
Delay for adq Gap (s) 10.96 42.33
Avg Ped Delay (s) 8.53 38.82
199
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 67 3 40 2 2 7 48 879 3 9 861 50
Future Volume (vph) 67 3 40 2 2 7 48 879 3 9 861 50
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.90 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1745 1583 1640 1770 3537 1770 3503
Flt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1329 1583 1598 1770 3537 1770 3503
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 4 49 2 2 9 59 1085 4 11 1063 62
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 44 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 87 5 0 5 0 59 1089 0 11 1123 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 6 2 2 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4 4 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 13.0 13.0 7.4 88.1 1.3 80.0
Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 13.0 13.0 7.4 88.1 1.3 80.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.73 0.01 0.67
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 143 171 173 109 2596 19 2335
v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 0.31 0.01 c0.32
v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.00 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.03 0.02 0.54 0.41 0.57 0.48
Uniform Delay, d1 51.0 47.8 47.8 54.6 6.1 59.0 9.8
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 2.06
Incremental Delay, d2 7.1 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.5 20.7 0.6
Delay (s) 58.2 47.9 47.9 57.5 6.6 82.4 20.9
Level of Service E D D E A F C
Approach Delay (s/veh) 54.5 47.9 9.2 21.5
Approach LOS D D A C
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 17.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.50
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
200
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
15: Moraga Rd & Ascot Dr/Shopping Ctr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 76 6 37 10 2 20 59 788 14 19 880 99 Future Volume (vph) 76 6 37 10 2 20 59 788 14 19 880 99 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.91 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1780 1583 1663 1770 3528 1770 3463
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1780 1583 1663 1770 3528 1770 3463
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Adj. Flow (vph) 92 7 45 12 2 24 71 949 17 23 1060 119
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 41 0 22 0 0 1 0 0 4 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 99 5 0 16 0 71 965 0 23 1175 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 1 1 15 2 2 15
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 4
Turn Type Split NA Perm Split NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 4 3 8 3 8 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases 4
Actuated Green, G (s) 12.0 12.0 10.3 7.4 70.3 5.4 68.3
Effective Green, g (s) 12.0 12.0 10.3 7.4 70.3 5.4 68.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.59 0.05 0.57
Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 1.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 178 158 142 109 2066 79 1971
v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.01 c0.04 0.27 0.01 c0.34
v/s Ratio Perm 0.00
v/c Ratio 0.55 0.02 0.11 0.65 0.46 0.29 0.59
Uniform Delay, d1 51.4 48.7 50.6 55.0 14.1 55.4 16.8
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.24 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 0.0 0.3 9.5 0.7 0.7 1.3
Delay (s) 55.1 48.8 50.9 60.9 18.4 56.1 18.1
Level of Service E D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s/veh) 53.1 50.9 21.3 18.9
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay (s/veh) 22.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 22.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
201
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
4: Moraga Rd & Corliss Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 131 23 22 686 711 144
Future Volume (vph) 131 23 22 686 711 144
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 0 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1
Taper Length (ft) 25 100
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.980 0.850
Flt Protected 0.959 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 0 1770 1863 1863 1583
Flt Permitted 0.959 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 1751 0 1770 1863 1863 1583
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 188 238 831
Travel Time (s) 4.3 5.4 9.1
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4
Peak Hour Factor 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82
Adj. Flow (vph) 160 28 27 837 867 176
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 188 0 27 837 867 176
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
202
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
7: Moraga Rd & Draeger Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 17 31 794 17 27 842
Future Volume (vph) 17 31 794 17 27 842
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Ped Bike Factor
Frt 0.913 0.997
Flt Protected 0.983 0.998
Satd. Flow (prot) 1672 0 3529 0 0 3356
Flt Permitted 0.983 0.998
Satd. Flow (perm) 1672 0 3529 0 0 3356
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 165 831 1562
Travel Time (s) 3.8 9.8 16.8
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 2
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81
Parking (#/hr) 0
Adj. Flow (vph) 21 38 980 21 33 1040
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 0 1001 0 0 1073
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left
Median Width(ft) 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.07
Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15
Sign Control Stop Free Free
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Control Type: Unsignalized
Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
203
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 3 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 67 3 40 2 2 7 48 879 3 9 861 50
Future Volume (vph) 67 3 40 2 2 7 48 879 3 9 861 50
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 125 0 100 0
Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 70 65
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
Frt 0.850 0.907 0.999 0.992
Flt Protected 0.954 0.992 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1777 1583 0 1640 0 1770 3535 0 1770 3504 0 Flt Permitted 0.727 0.967 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1329 1583 0 1598 0 1763 3535 0 1767 3504 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 91 9 7
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 243 192 1562 457
Travel Time (s) 5.5 4.4 35.5 10.4
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 6 2 2 6
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2
Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 4 49 2 2 9 59 1085 4 11 1063 62
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 87 49 0 13 0 59 1089 0 11 1125 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
204
Lanes, Volumes, Timings
12: Moraga Rd & Donald Dr 06/20/2024
2024 Base PM Peak 3:00 pm 05/22/2024 Baseline Synchro 12 Report

Page 4 ends

1 - Town CouncilFebruary 25, 2026

1 - Town Council
February 25, 2026