Cities Index.
Agenda packet, second session

1 - Town Council
July 8, 2026

Document
Agenda packet, second session
Meeting
July 8, 2026
Body
1 - Town Council
Pages
17
Original file
17.9 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on d3n9y02raazwpg.cloudfront.net. That file is the official record.

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2026
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
Brian Dolan, Vice Mayor
Lisa Maglio, Councilmember
Graham Thiel, Councilmember
Steve Woehleke, Councilmember
Scott Mitnick, Town Manager
Katie Bruner, Admin. Services Director
Sonia Urzua, Planning Director
Amy Heavener, Town Clerk
Denise Bazzano, Assistant Town Attorney
Jon King, Police Chief
Nate Levine, Public Works Director
Mackenzie Brady, Parks & Recreation Director
Executive Team
Town of Moraga Mission Statement
The Town of Moraga is dedicated to preserving our semi-rural character, conserving open spaces, providing exceptional municipal services, fostering safety and resiliency, providing opportunities for development, and creating a vibrant, innovative, and sustainable community for all.

AGENDA ACCESS: The meeting agenda is posted on the following notice board locations: 329 Rheem Blvd.; Moraga Library located at 1500 St. Marys Rd.; The Hacienda located at 2100 Donald Drive; and Online at:
https://www.moraga.ca.us/AgendaCenter
VIEWING OPTIONS: The Moraga Town Council meeting is scheduled to take place on the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month. The meeting may be attended in person at 335 Rheem Blvd, Moraga, on your Local Community Access Television (CATV); or by viewing the Town's YouTube Live channel at:
https://www.youtube.com/@TownofMoraga335
You may now view and participate in the Town of Moraga Town Council meetings via Zoom by navigating to Zoom.com and using the unique Meeting ID and Password published with each agenda.

PUBLIC INPUT: To provide input to the Town Council please submit comments via the following email address: [email protected] up to two hours prior to the start of the meeting. Written comment cards will also be available for submission at the meeting. Individuals addressing the Town Council are requested to state their name and community of residence for the record. If further assistance is needed, please email the Town Clerk at [email protected] or call (925) 888-7021.

It is the policy of the Town of Moraga that Councilmembers, Town employees and meeting participants are to be treated with respect and dignity. Actual or perceived discrimination and/or harassment of a Councilmember, Town employee or others on the basis of age, ancestry, color, disability, gender identity, marital status, medical condition, national origin, race, religious creed, sex or sexual orientation will not be tolerated.

CEQA STATEMENT: Unless stated otherwise on the agenda, every item on the agenda is exempt from CEQA Guidelines Sections 15060(C), 15061(B)(3), 15273, 15378, 15301, 15323 and/or Public Resources Code Section 21065.

NOTICE: If you challenge a Town's zoning, planning, or other decision in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Town Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Judging review of any Town administrative decision may be had only if petition is filed with the court not later than the 90th day following the date upon which the decision becomes final. Judicial review of environment determination may be subject to a shorter time period for litigation, in certain cases 30 days following the date of final decision. The Town of Moraga will provide special assistance for disabled citizens upon at least 72 hours advance notice to the Town Manager's office (925- 888-7021). If sign assistance is needed or written material printed in a larger font or taped, advance notice is necessary. All meeting rooms are accessible to the disabled.

July 8, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
1 TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JULY 8, 2026
5:30 PM

TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBER
335 RHEEM BOULEVARD

MORAGA, CA
Senate Bill 707 (2025) (“SB 707”) requires all “eligible legislative bodies” to offer remote public access for Town Council meetings through either two-way telephonic service or two-way audiovisual platforms. As a result, the Town of Moraga is offering remote participation via Zoom for all Town Council Regular and Special meetings.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR VIEWING AND PARTICIPATING IN THIS MEETING IN PERSON: If you would like to speak during the public forum or on an item listed on the agenda, you are invited to submit a speaker card to the Town Clerk. You will be permitted to speak even if you elect not to submit a speaker card or decline to provide information requested on the card. Speakers will be called in the following order: Speakers who submit a speaker card to the Town Clerk will be called to speak first, followed by in-person speakers who raise their hand but do not submit a speaker card. Lastly, speakers who are attending remotely will need to raise their virtual hand and will subsequently be called upon to provide a remote verbal comment. Public comment is generally limited to 3 minutes per speaker per agenda item.

WRITTEN COMMENTS: You may also submit a public comment in advance of the meeting.

You may hand deliver your comments to Town Hall at 329 Rheem Blvd. Moraga, CA 94556 or send an e-mail to [email protected] Please submit your comments two (2) hours prior to the start of the first meeting on the day of the scheduled Town Council meeting in order for your written comments to be included as part of the written record for the meeting. Your comments will be provided to the Town Council and will also be made a part of the public record at the meeting.

REMOTE ACCESS: You may participate remotely by accessing zoom.com and providing the webinar ID and passcode listed below or you may click the Zoom link below and provide the webinar ID and passcode.

NOTE: you MUST raise your virtual hand or the Town Clerk will not know you wish to make a comment.

Zoom Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82013903893?pwd=dnF7Cthzl9rA4QEc8vzIvxHVOUHaO3.1 Webinar ID: 820 1390 3893
Passcode: 570988
July 8, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
2 1. CALL TO ORDER

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PRESENTATIONS
A. Proclamation - Parks & Recreation Month
B. Proclamation - Port Chicago Remembrance Day - July 17, 2026

4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION

5. ADOPTION OF MEETING AGENDA

6. CONSENT CALENDAR

6.1 Receive Accounts Payable Claims for: June 8, 2026 - June 30, 2026 ($726,273.13).

Staff Report

6.2 Approval of Meeting Minutes for the June 10, 2026 Regular meeting: June 24, 2026 Special Closed Session and June 24, 2026 Regular meeting of the Moraga Town Council.

Staff Report

ROLL CALL
Parks and Recreation Month July 2026
Port Chicago Remembrance Day July 17 2026
Time reserved for those in the audience who wish to address the Town Council on items which are not on the agenda. The Council cannot discuss details or vote on items not on the agenda. Your concerns may be referred to the Town Manager for a brief comment or for further review. Note: Public input pertaining to a specific item on the agenda may be made during consideration of that item.

Public Communication Received Prior to Meeting
Addendum - Public Communication Received Prior to Meeting A. Consideration of Consent Items Removed for Discussion B. Acceptance of Consent Items
Attachment A - June 2026 Monthly Check Report
Attachment A - DRAFT - JUN 10 2026 - TC Meeting Minutes - REG Attachment B - DRAFT - JUN 24 2026 - TC Closed Session Meeting Minutes - SPC Attachment C - DRAFT - JUN 24 2026 - TC Meeting Minutes - REG July 8, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
3 6.3 Waive the second reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 8.124 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Moraga Municipal Code to ensure consistency with current State ADU law, the Moraga 2040 General Plan, and the 2023–2031 Housing Element. Find the Ordinance exempt from review pursuant to section 15282(h) of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Staff Report

6.4 Adopt a resolution Adopting the Town of Moraga’s Conflict of Interest Code for the Biennial Update.

Staff Report

6.5 Adopt a resolution establishing the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Appropriations Limit (Gann Limit).

Staff Report

6.6 Adopt a resolution updating the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Appropriations Limit (Gann Limit).

Staff Report

6.7 Adopt a Resolution:

1. Authorizing the Town Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Haley & Aldrich, Inc. for the Rheem Boulevard at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project (CIP 25-408) in a total amount not to exceed $237,519, which includes the agreement amount of $215,927 and a ten percent contingency of $21,592; and

2. Authorizing the Town Manager or designee to authorize individual phases, optional/additional tasks, and use of contingency within the approved total notto-exceed amount; and

3. Finding that the recommended action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is limited to consultant design and related professional services and does not approve construction or physical changes to the environment.

Staff Report

7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS ON ACTIVITIES
Attachment A - Draft Ordinance to MMC Chapter 8.124
Attachment A - Draft Resolution - Updating Conflict of Interest Code Attachment A and Exhibit A - Draft Resolution - Annual GANN Limit - FY27 Attachment A - Exhibit A - Draft Resolution - Annual GANN Limit Correction - FY26 Attachment A - DRAFT Resolution - Rheem Chalda Slide Repair Attachment B - SiteMap
Attachment C - PSA Rheem Blvd Slide Repair Award
Attachment D - CIP 25-408 Budget Sheet
A. Councilmember Reports on AB1234 Activities, Councilmember Announcements B. Town Manager
July 8, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
4 8. PUBLIC HEARING

9. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
9A Adopt a resolution:

1. Amending the Fiscal Year 2026-27 operating budget by increasing General Fund Revenues and Appropriations by $201,585; and

2. Amending the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Budget to add the Commons Park All Access Playground Shade Structure (CIP 26-304), with a total project budget of $218,000.

Staff Report
9B Receive the report and direct staff to p roceed with demolition planning for the La Sala building located at the Hacienda de las Flores property.

Staff Report

10. COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

11. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

12. TOWN MANAGER FOLLOW-UP AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Attachment A - DRAFT Resolution - FY27 Budget Adjustments Attachment B - General Fund Budget Summary
Attachment C - FY27 Update Authorized FTE Summary
Attachment D - CIP 26-304 - All Access Playground Shade Structure Attachment A - La Sala Environmental Assessment Report
Attachment B - La Sala Cost Summary
Attachment C - Site Map
Attachment D - La Sala Existing Conditions Photos
9B - Addendum - Public Communication Received Prior to Meeting

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS/PRESENTATIONS
Supplemental Materials Received During the Meeting
Town Manager Update - Rheem Blvd Project Update
9A Presentation - FY27 Budget Update
9B Presentation - La Sala Building Update
July 8, 2026
Town Council Regular Meeting
5 A PROCLAMATION DECLARING
July 2026 as Parks & Recreation Month
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation is an integral part of communities throughout this country, including the Town of Moraga; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation promotes health and wellness, improving the physical and mental health of people who live near parks; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation promotes time spent in nature, which positively impacts mental health by increasing cognitive performance and well-being, and alleviating illnesses such as depression, attention deficit disorders, and Alzheimers; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation encourages physical activities by providing space for popular sports, hiking trails and many other activities designed to promote active lifestyles; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation programming and education activities, such as out-of-school time programming, youth sports and environmental education, are critical to childhood development; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation increases a community’s economic prosperity through increased property values, expansion of the local tax base, increased tourism, the attraction and retention of businesses, and crime reduction; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation is fundamental to the environmental wellbeing of our community; and WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation is essential and adaptable infrastructure that makes our communities resilient in the face of natural disasters and climate change; and WHEREAS, our parks and natural recreation areas ensure the ecological beauty of our community and provide a place for children and adults to connect with nature and recreate outdoors; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. House of Representatives has designated July as Parks and Recreation Month; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town of Moraga that the month of July is recognized as Parks and Recreation Month in the Town of Moraga. _________________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
Town of Moraga
6 A PROCLAMATION
In Recognition of Port Chicago Remembrance Day
July 17, 2026
WHEREAS, the Port Chicago Naval Magazine was the site where African American Sailors were exclusively assigned during World War II to the dangerous task of loading explosives onto cargo ships; and
WHEREAS, on the night of July 17, 1944, a catastrophic explosion resulted in the deadliest home front disaster of the war - killing 320 people, most of them African American Sailors, injuring 390 others, and inflicting widespread damage on the nearby town of Port Chicago, California; and
WHEREAS, 258 surviving African American Sailors, citing unaddressed safety concerns, protested the order to resume loading munitions, drawing national attention to racial discrimination and hazardous working conditions in the military, and WHEREAS, 50 of those Sailors, known as the Port Chicago 50, were wrongfully charged and convicted of mutiny; and
WHEREAS, on July 17, 2024, Secretary of the Navy, Carlos Del Toro, officially announced the full exoneration of the Port Chicago 50 and 206 other sailors who were punished for the work stoppage after the disaster. This signified a landmark moment in history and officially cleared the names of those brave men.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Moraga hereby proclaims July 17th as Port Chicago Remembrance Day to honor the victims of the Port Chicago disaster, recognizing the bravery and legacy of the Port Chicago Sailors and seeking to educate future generations about this defining chapter in American history. _________________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
Town of Moraga
7 TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
July 08, 2026
Addendum(s) to Published Agenda
4: Public Communication
Update Includes:
• Public Communications received prior to the meeting
8 












 !
"#$#!
%&'#$#!(')*+*,!*,&-
./012
34546768
59::
;"
 $#*
<)=*
%&)=*(')*+*,!*,&->
?*==*$@
A1$#&1
,
%2B*==*$(BC&*C,!'->
D*)1$
0,
")EFG
%')EFG(BC&*C,!'->
"#!F11
D1$G$
%'1$G$(BC&*C,!'->
H*1
I1J#$1
%$1J#$1(')*+*,!*,&->
"*!1$=#1
?)*2G
%'B)*2G(')*+*,!*,&->
;'G
K1*J1$1)
%*F1*J1$1)(')*+*,!*,&->
D*#1
?)$1)
%B)$1)(')*+*,!*,&->
L$
D#$+
%#$+(')*+*,!*,&->
L1MM
N&**!&
%O#&**!&('M2,)+-
PQN
?1+#$
M)C*)212
'1&&*+19
RSTUV
=*$$1
L$1&
%&=*$$1($C#)122,!'- WXYZV
LG
5@
6768
*
89[39\6
;"
]A^
_TV
D1))G
K##&
%F##&(')*+*,!*,&-@
?)#*$
A*$
%B2*$(')*+*,!*,&-@
1J1
01F11
%&C1F11(')*+*,!*,&-@
I#&*
"*+#
%'*+#(')*+*,!*,&-@
`)*F*'
^F#1
%+F#1(')*+*,!*,&-
abV
]*$$#$+
%E*$$#$+(')*+*,!*,&-@
!
"#$#!
%&'#$#!(')*+*,!*,&-@
^C$
c1)
%C$!1)(')*+*,!*,&-
defgZbYV
hefijb
bTUUZkY
YT
YlZ
_Tmk
aTekbji
nopoqr
c;<^NH9
^F#&
1'*#
)#+#$*12
M)'
&#21
F1
)+*$#=*#$,
A
$
!#!
#$&
)
E1$
**!F'1$&
$1&&
G
)1!+$#=1
F1
&1$21)
*$2
$C
F1
!$1$&
#&
&*M1,
stuv
wx
yzy{

|}~
€~v
‚ƒuuƒ„
~
†
€}‡ˆ}„
‰
Š‹}
Œ

ށt
ƒux


~‡

Š~‘
’
vt


ˆ}‹~u‰
‰
“}„}”}
•~‡ƒ
†~
–—}

˜—~}
ƒŠ‹
}„—}Š
Ё
—„„ƒˆu}

„Št‘

‰
~Š‹u}‘
™}u†„
~Š
“~u„
ށu~†„š
Œ‹ƒ„
Ġ}~
‹~„
~——~}
Šuv
~ƒ„}

ƒ

Š‹}

Š}›Š
‰
Š‹}
“~œ„x
}}~‘

~
†
–—}

˜—~}
€~„Š}
“u~

t—†~Š}š

ž}
}’
ƒŸ}
Š‹}
ƒ‡—Š~
}
‰
}
„tƒ
’
Š‹~Š
€~’~ „
vtŠ‹
~Š‹u}‘
u}~’t}„
‹~”}
~uu
Š‹}
™}u†
‘‡}
Š‹}v

}}†š
Œ
Š‹~Š
}
†x
}
t’}
Š‹}
Œ

Ё
‰t„
™„Š
~
†
‰}‡„Š


‡~›ƒ‡ƒŸƒ
’
Š‹}
~”~ƒu~ˆƒuƒŠv
‰
}›ƒ„‘
’
™}u†„
ƒ

—}~‘

ƒŠ‹
Š‹}
€~’~
˜‹u
|ƒ„ŠƒŠ
~
†
˜~ƒ
Š
€~v „
ށuu}’}
„t‹
Š‹~Š
€~’~ „
~Š‹u}‘
—’~‡„
‹~”}
™„Š
—ƒƒŠv
‹}

™}u†„
~}

Š
Š‹}ƒ„}
ƒ

t„}š

¡¢£¢¤¥¦
¤§¨©
ª«¬­®¯°
±
²³´
µ¶·¸¶­¶¹
±
º»¼½¯¯¾
¿¼¼ÀÁ§¢¢¯»¼½¯¯¾Â¯ÃÃÄŶÂů³¢³·Ä½¢­¯­¶¢ÄÆ¢²²¾²ÇȲ²²²²²µÉÊËÌ·À³ÌŤ®´²ÍβÍϤÐÌÑÈÒ²ÓÔ»´¹Ï¤ÕÖÁϤÐ×´ÕÏ¤ÐØÖ£ÇËÔÙÀʲÍÊÚÛÄ×ʲ²Ü­ÝÛ¢¤9  





 



 
 



 
 







  
 





 

 













 ! 



 
"



#





$
" 

 

 

 
 


$
" 



 
















 %

 



 &
 


'


%

  





 ( 






  



)
 




 







"


 
 







 )

 

%

 %

 
 
 
 


*

 
# 


 ) 
 





  






 



 


)
+)

 
%



 
 %

 

 % !


$

" 
 





 








 

$




 





 &
,






 

),

 
 




 






#  
 



!-

$ 

. 

$/
0012
 
"345660
7898:;<:=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNLCLOGPQRSEET
URRVW=88EQRSEETXEYYZ[LX[EI8IMZS8CECL8Z\8HHTH]^HHHHHHK_`abMVIb[:DJHcdHce:fbg^hHijQJOe:klWe:fmJke:fnl9]ajoV`Hc`pqZm`HHrCs:8:
10 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.1
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Katie Bruner, Administrative Services Director
Subject: Receive Accounts Payable Claims for: June 8, 2026 - June 30, 2026 ($726,273.13)
Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Receive Accounts Payable Claims for: June 8, 2026 - June 30, 2026 ($726,273.13).

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - June 2026 Monthly Check Report
11 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 1 of 12
Monthly Check Report
Town of Moraga By Check Number
Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount Bank Code: AP Bank -AP Bank
0073 All City Management Services, Inc. 06/11/2026 66492 Regular 0.00 1,454.95 PS-INV106402 Invoice 06/08/2026 School Crossing Guard Svcs: 2026.05.10-05… 0.00 1,454.95 0180 AT&T 06/11/2026 66493 Regular 0.00 32.52
000025348961 Invoice 06/09/2026 Sprinkler Alm Town Hall 329 Rheem BAN … 32.52 0.00 0182 ATCO Pest Control, Inc. 06/11/2026 66494 Regular 0.00 400.00 243858 Invoice 06/04/2026 Pest Control 400.00 0.00
0232 Benali Inc. 06/11/2026 66495 Regular 0.00 162.25
040345 Invoice 04/14/2026 Maint Suplies 42.68 0.00
40450 Invoice 06/04/2026 Maint Supplies 119.57 0.00
0252 BKF Engineers 06/11/2026 66496 Regular 0.00 154.50 060220 Invoice 06/04/2026 22-202 Laguna Creek Prof Svcs: 2026.04.2… 154.50 0.00 0305 Burke, Williams & Sorensen 06/11/2026 66497 Regular 0.00 30,770.72 367264 Invoice 06/04/2026 P90-039 Legal Fees: 05655-0118 2026.04 2,875.08 0.00 367265 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: Gen 05655-0113 2026.04 386.88 0.00 367266 Invoice 06/04/2026 P90-039 Legal Fees: 05655-0076 2026.04 1,008.80 0.00 367267 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: Pers 05655-0111 2026.04 7,807.28 0.00 367268 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: Gen 05655-0010 2026.04 7,725.58 0.00 367269 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: 05655-0136 2026.04 2,321.28 0.00 367270 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: Lit 05655-0165 2026.04 320.32 0.00 367271 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: Gen 05655-0168 2026.04 128.96 0.00 367272 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: Gen 05655-0179 2026.04 361.08 0.00 367273 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Fees: Gen 05655-0180 2026.04 1,572.48 0.00 367274 Invoice 06/04/2026 D25-025 Legal Fees: 05655-0186 2026.04 1,664.52 0.00 367275 Invoice 06/04/2026 20-501 Legal Fees: 05655-0191 2026.04 3,791.42 0.00 367276 Invoice 06/04/2026 D25-020 Legal Fees: 05655-0200 807.04 0.00 **Void** 06/11/2026 66498 Regular 0.00 0.00
0364 Cassius Carandang 06/11/2026 66499 Regular 0.00 26.03 INV0000600 Invoice 06/04/2026 Mileage for Wireless Training 26.03 0.00 0438 CivicPlus, LLC 06/11/2026 66500 Regular 0.00 4,443.78 #366416 Invoice 06/04/2026 Annual Supplementation Subscr. 4,443.78 0.00 0445 Cole Supply Company, LLC 06/11/2026 66501 Regular 0.00 943.75 11775416 Invoice 06/04/2026 Park Janitorial Supplies 943.75 0.00 0601 Department of Justice 06/11/2026 66502 Regular 0.00 834.00 050995 Invoice 06/08/2026 LiveScan: 2026.05 834.00 0.00 0671 East Bay Tree Service, Inc. 06/11/2026 66503 Regular 0.00 8,400.00 #598931 Invoice 06/04/2026 Emergency Tree Work 3,000.00 0.00 #598940 Invoice 06/04/2026 Hacienda Tree Work 800.00 0.00 #598967 Invoice 06/04/2026 Fire Abatement 4,600.00 0.00 0746 F.J. Kennedy and Associates 06/11/2026 66504 Regular 0.00 24.50 26-014 Invoice 02/04/2026 D25-015 Prof Svcs: 2026.01 24.50 0.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/11/2026 66505 Regular 0.00 1,950.00 INV-95141 Invoice 06/04/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement 1,150.00 0.00 INV-95142 Invoice 06/04/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement 800.00 0.00 0786 G&K Petroleum, Inc. 06/11/2026 66506 Regular 0.00 3,067.78 Attachment A
12 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 2 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1018201 Invoice 06/09/2026 Fuel Purchases: 2026.05.17-06.05 3,067.78 0.00 0865 Harris & Associates, Inc. 06/11/2026 66507 Regular 0.00 17,898.75 69761-1 Invoice 05/29/2026 22-401 Prof Svcs: 2025.07.03-2025.08.30 17,898.75 0.00 0918 Impec Group Inc. 06/11/2026 66508 Regular 0.00 4,239.04 2605143 Invoice 06/04/2026 Facility Janitorial Svc: 2026.05 4,239.04 0.00 1072 Jordan Gunn 06/11/2026 66509 Regular 0.00 2,376.00 INV0000603 Invoice 06/04/2026 Karate Kids 2,376.00 0.00 1082 Joseph's Lawnmower & Lock Shop, Inc. 06/11/2026 66510 Regular 0.00 513.04 430439 Invoice 06/04/2026 Equip Maint 218.46 0.00
430440 Invoice 06/04/2026 Mower Maint 294.58 0.00
1231 Lamorinda Publishing Inc. 06/11/2026 66511 Regular 0.00 946.00 1016304 Invoice 06/04/2026 Community Meeting Advertising 946.00 0.00 1272 Legal Defense Fund of the PORAC 06/11/2026 66512 Regular 0.00 24.00 900009 Invoice 06/04/2026 Legal Defense Fund: 2026.07 24.00 0.00 1501 MNG PARTNERSHIP HOLDINGS LLC 06/11/2026 66513 Regular 0.00 845.10 1475967 Invoice 06/04/2026 Classified Advertising 845.10 0.00 1555 Municipal Resource Group, LLC 06/11/2026 66514 Regular 0.00 7,150.00 260482 Invoice 06/04/2026 On-Call HR Consulting Prof Svcs: 2026.04 7,150.00 0.00 2320 North Bay Restroom Co LLC 06/11/2026 66515 Regular 0.00 4,137.50 INV-06080806 Invoice 06/04/2026 Restroom Trailer Rental - Summer Camp 2… 4,137.50 0.00 1669 Peace Officers Research Association of CA 06/11/2026 66516 Regular 0.00 12.00 530674 Invoice 06/04/2026 Membership Dues: 2026.07 12.00 0.00 1706 Pro Tow Co. 06/11/2026 66517 Regular 0.00 150.00
238993 Invoice 06/08/2026 Veh Towing 150.00 0.00
1712 PTS Communications Inc. 06/11/2026 66518 Regular 0.00 75.00 2154422 Invoice 06/04/2026 Pay Phone Chrg: Rancho Laguna 9259130… 75.00 0.00 1738 Randy D. Dismuke 06/11/2026 66519 Regular 0.00 525.00 019117 Invoice 06/04/2026 Mower Maint 525.00 0.00
1783 Rincon Consultants, Inc. 06/11/2026 66520 Regular 0.00 20,967.51 74268 Invoice 06/09/2026 D25-020 WA P-2026-02 Prof Svcs: 2026.04 20,967.51 0.00 1868 SANDIS Civil Engineers Surveyors Planners 06/11/2026 66521 Regular 0.00 11,346.25 2604354 Invoice 06/04/2026 D25-020 Prof Svcs through 2026.04 11,346.25 0.00 1891 Scott Carr 06/11/2026 66522 Regular 0.00 2,000.00
INV0000601 Invoice 06/04/2026 Fire Abatement 2,000.00 0.00 2045 T-Mobile 06/11/2026 66523 Regular 0.00 26.88
973577418 2026.…Invoice 06/04/2026 TMOBILE 973577418 26.88 0.00 2117 Townsend Public Affairs, Inc 06/11/2026 66524 Regular 0.00 1,500.00 25411 Invoice 06/04/2026 Lamorinda Legis. Coalition - Cons. Svcs: 20… 1,500.00 0.00 2131 Tyler Technologies, Inc 06/11/2026 66525 Regular 0.00 4,060.00 025-552404 Invoice 05/26/2026 Tyler ERP Pro Cloud Implementation 1,595.00 0.00 025-552957 Invoice 05/26/2026 Tyler ERP Pro Cloud Implementation 435.00 0.00 025-553452 Invoice 05/26/2026 Tyler ERP Pro Cloud Implementation 1,015.00 0.00 025-553938 Invoice 06/04/2026 Tyler ERP Pro Cloud Implementation 1,015.00 0.00 2174 Wallace Roberts & Todd INC 06/11/2026 66526 Regular 0.00 7,466.00 0000010 Invoice 06/04/2026 PROS Master Plan Prof Svcs through 2026.… 7,466.00 0.00 2180 Waterproofing Associates, Inc. 06/11/2026 66527 Regular 0.00 2,780.00 13 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 3 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 51955 Invoice 06/04/2026 La Sala Roof Repair 2,780.00 0.00 2217 Yaron Shoshan 06/11/2026 66528 Regular 0.00 1,000.00 2026.06 Invoice 06/04/2026 Landscape Maint: 1,000.00 0.00 0073 All City Management Services, Inc. 06/25/2026 66529 Regular 0.00 581.98 PS-INV106770 Invoice 06/22/2026 School Crossing Guard Svcs: 2026.05.24-06… 0.00 581.98 0091 Amazon Capital Services, Inc 06/25/2026 66530 Regular 0.00 358.32 133L-1GHG-KM7T Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 29.62 0.00 17NG-FRLK-KLWR Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 115.62 0.00 19WN-DTDW-YY… Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 213.08 0.00 2326 Andrew Merovich 06/25/2026 66531 Regular 0.00 2,887.80 1849 Invoice 06/22/2026 LEGO and Robotics Camps 2,887.80 0.00 0176 Association of Bay Area Governments 06/25/2026 66532 Regular 0.00 1,895.07 1002017 Invoice 06/22/2026 Hacienda Pooled Power Customer No: T00… 1,895.07 0.00 0180 AT&T 06/25/2026 66533 Regular 0.00 32.15
000025419438 Invoice 06/22/2026 Fax 329 Rheem BAN 9391020641 32.15 0.00 0180 AT&T 06/25/2026 66534 Regular 0.00 193.54
000025419381 Invoice 06/22/2026 AT&T BAN 9391019310 193.54 0.00 0180 AT&T 06/25/2026 66535 Regular 0.00 33.37
000025419437 Invoice 06/22/2026 Fax: Hacienda 2100 Donald BAN 9391020… 33.37 0.00 0180 AT&T 06/25/2026 66536 Regular 0.00 32.14
000025420145 Invoice 06/22/2026 Emer. Phone: Town Hall 329 Rheem BAN … 32.14 0.00 0180 AT&T 06/25/2026 66537 Regular 0.00 154.45
000025419382 Invoice 06/22/2026 Alarm Council Chambers 335 Rheem BAN … 154.45 0.00 0180 AT&T 06/25/2026 66538 Regular 0.00 156.45
000025419444 Invoice 06/22/2026 AT&T BAN 9391020639 156.45 0.00 0188 Autohaus Moraga 06/25/2026 66539 Regular 0.00 1,264.20 #24603 Invoice 06/22/2026 Veh Maint Oil Svc 166.34 0.00 24348 Invoice 06/22/2026 Veh Maint Oil Filter & Radiator Hose 471.78 0.00 24535 Invoice 06/22/2026 Veh Maint Oil and Brake Svc 436.34 0.00 24584 Invoice 06/22/2026 Veh Maint Oil and Tire Svc 189.74 0.00 0208 Barry Miller 06/25/2026 66540 Regular 0.00 2,400.00 2026-15 #31 Invoice 06/22/2026 20-501 Phase II Housing Element Prof Svcs:… 0.00 2,400.00 0215 Bay Area Drainage, Inc. 06/25/2026 66541 Regular 0.00 11,996.86 2100315-2304 Invoice 06/22/2026 329 Rheem Rear Drainage 11,996.86 0.00 0255 BLAISDELL & SOGNEY, INC. 06/25/2026 66542 Regular 0.00 322.57 2035529-0 Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 313.83 0.00 2035529-1 Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 8.74 0.00
0429 City of Lafayette 06/25/2026 66543 Regular 0.00 1,852.96 INV0000650 Invoice 06/22/2026 LFFA Fees for 284 Calle La Mesa 1,852.96 0.00 0666 East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. 06/25/2026 66544 Regular 0.00 191.36 31830300001 20… Invoice 06/22/2026 Water Svcs 1391 Moraga Rd Acct: 318303… 191.36 0.00 0666 East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. 06/25/2026 66545 Regular 0.00 8,310.51 28260400001 20…Invoice 06/22/2026 Water Svcs 1401 St Marys Rd Acct: 28260… 8,310.51 0.00 0666 East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. 06/25/2026 66546 Regular 0.00 152.28 17421953287 20… Invoice 06/22/2026 Water Svcs: 800 Canyon Rd Acct: 1742195… 152.28 0.00 0666 East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. 06/25/2026 66547 Regular 0.00 171.82 14 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 4 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 12212300001 20… Invoice 06/22/2026 Water Svcs 848 Country Club Dr Acct: 122… 171.82 0.00 0666 East Bay Municipal Utility Dist. 06/25/2026 66548 Regular 0.00 1,012.04 28241200001 20…Invoice 06/22/2026 Water Svcs Lib 1500 St Marys Acct: 28241… 1,012.04 0.00 2327 Gigi Walker 06/25/2026 66549 Regular 0.00 5,124.59 2629 Invoice 06/24/2026 Claim #VCD-2162-MG Unit #151 Vehicle R… 5,124.59 0.00 0876 Health Care Dental Trust 06/25/2026 66550 Regular 0.00 3,692.74 380684 Invoice 06/22/2026 Dental Insurance: 2026.07 3,692.74 0.00 2323 Jennifer Corrales 06/25/2026 66551 Regular 0.00 1,525.00 #688282 Invoice 06/22/2026 4th of July Entertainment 1,525.00 0.00 1231 Lamorinda Publishing Inc. 06/25/2026 66552 Regular 0.00 654.00 1016373 Invoice 06/22/2026 4th of July Advertisement 654.00 0.00 1282 Lexipol LLC 06/25/2026 66553 Regular 0.00 6,409.07 #INVLEX11272186 Invoice 06/22/2026 Annual Law Enforcement Policy Manual &… 6,409.07 0.00 2321 Longeye Inc 06/25/2026 66554 Regular 0.00 3,600.00 1008 Invoice 06/08/2026 Annual Subscription for Longeye Investigat… 0.00 3,600.00 1328 Lucianne Edwards 06/25/2026 66555 Regular 0.00 1,312.50 #060526B Invoice 06/22/2026 Camp KinderCool LP Week of 06/01/2026 1,312.50 0.00 2307 Moraga Builders Corporation 06/25/2026 66556 Regular 0.00 8,329.39 INV0000659 Invoice 06/22/2026 I19-003 and I19-008 Deposit Refunds 8,329.39 0.00 1536 Moraga Service Center 06/25/2026 66557 Regular 0.00 81.70 47581 Invoice 05/29/2026 Smog Check 81.70 0.00
1547 Motorola Solutions, Inc. 06/25/2026 66558 Regular 0.00 172.99 8282263022 Invoice 06/22/2026 Portable Radio Equipment 172.99 0.00 1555 Municipal Resource Group, LLC 06/25/2026 66559 Regular 0.00 7,280.00 260530 Invoice 06/22/2026 Organizational Assessment 7,280.00 0.00 1604 NorCal Rental Group, LLC 06/25/2026 66560 Regular 0.00 716.18 6632521-0001 Invoice 06/22/2026 Maint Supplies 716.18 0.00 1697 PlaceWorks, Inc. 06/25/2026 66561 Regular 0.00 77.50 TNMO-06.0 4 DM Debit Memo 06/18/2026 Payment Reissue from Voided Check #651… 77.50 0.00 2325 Planting Seeds Academic Solutions 06/25/2026 66562 Regular 0.00 1,155.00 INV-00001 Invoice 06/22/2026 Slime Science 1,155.00 0.00 1717 Pyro Spectaculars North, Inc. 06/25/2026 66563 Regular 0.00 24,999.00 INV441691 Invoice 06/22/2026 2026 4th of July Celebration - Fireworks Ini… 0.00 12,500.00 INV441692 Invoice 06/22/2026 2026 4th of July Celebration - Fireworks Ba… 0.00 12,499.00 1720 Qualus Engineering CA, LLP 06/25/2026 66564 Regular 0.00 1,485.00 6200657 Invoice 06/22/2026 23-108 On-Call Eng Prof Svcs 2026.03.30-0… 1,485.00 0.00 1738 Randy D. Dismuke 06/25/2026 66565 Regular 0.00 4,117.18 019120 Invoice 06/08/2026 Mower Maint 2,887.30 0.00
019127 Invoice 06/12/2026 Mower Maint 1,229.88 0.00
1783 Rincon Consultants, Inc. 06/25/2026 66566 Regular 0.00 9,832.75 75005 Invoice 06/22/2026 D25-020 WA P-2026-02 Prof Svcs: 2026.05 9,832.75 0.00 1919 Shaun Marie Paul 06/25/2026 66567 Regular 0.00 1,312.50 #060526A Invoice 06/22/2026 Camp KinderCool LP - Wk of 06/01/2026 1,312.50 0.00 2324 Silly Circus Show LLC 06/25/2026 66568 Regular 0.00 750.00 #844 Invoice 06/22/2026 4th of July Entertainment 750.00 0.00 15 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 5 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1951 Soccer Stars of Contra Costa County, LLC 06/25/2026 66569 Regular 0.00 5,980.80 2673791 Invoice 06/22/2026 Spring Soccer Programs 5,980.80 0.00 2270 Stars Holding CO LLC 06/25/2026 66570 Regular 0.00 3,524.95 INV0000648 Invoice 05/30/2026 Fuel Purchases: 2026.05 3,524.95 0.00 2268 Victor M. Jacobo Alvarez 06/25/2026 66571 Regular 0.00 1,700.00 0235 Invoice 06/22/2026 329 Rheem Carpet Cleaning 1,500.00 0.00 0237 Invoice 06/22/2026 Library Carpet Cleaning 200.00 0.00 2201 William W. Davis 06/25/2026 66572 Regular 0.00 99.51 INV0000607 Invoice 06/09/2026 Reimb for Electronic Surveillance Training -… 0.00 99.51 2215 Yao Miao 06/25/2026 66573 Regular 0.00 1,560.00
INV0000657 Invoice 06/22/2026 Education Reimburse: Spring 2026 1,560.00 0.00 0192 Axon Enterprise Inc. 06/26/2026 66574 Regular 0.00 27,943.66 INUS451372 Invoice 06/26/2026 Tasers 27,943.66 0.00
0232 Benali Inc. 06/26/2026 66575 Regular 0.00 35.65
40548 Invoice 06/22/2026 Maint Supplies 35.65 0.00
2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000770 Bank Draft 0.00 1,228.08 INV0000563 Invoice 06/05/2026 401A Employer Contribution 1,228.08 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000771 Bank Draft 0.00 3,048.33 INV0000564 Invoice 06/05/2026 401A Employee Contribution 3,048.33 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000772 Bank Draft 0.00 1,690.57 INV0000565 Invoice 06/05/2026 Employee 457 Contribution 1,690.57 0.00 0210 BASIC Benefits LLC 06/05/2026 DFT0000773 Bank Draft 0.00 865.38 INV0000566 Invoice 06/05/2026 DCAP Employee Contribution 865.38 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000774 Bank Draft 0.00 10,906.21 INV0000567 Invoice 06/05/2026 457 Employee Contribution 10,906.21 0.00 0210 BASIC Benefits LLC 06/05/2026 DFT0000775 Bank Draft 0.00 1,019.89 INV0000568 Invoice 06/05/2026 FSA Employee Contribution 1,019.89 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000776 Bank Draft 0.00 4,784.64 INV0000569 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc Classic Employee Contribution 4,784.64 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000777 Bank Draft 0.00 3,453.63 INV0000570 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc Classic Employer Contribution 3,453.63 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000778 Bank Draft 0.00 7.44 INV0000571 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc Classic PERS Survivor Benefits Emplo… 7.44 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000779 Bank Draft 0.00 86.62 INV0000572 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc Classic PERS Service Credit 86.62 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000780 Bank Draft 0.00 7,130.85 INV0000573 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc PEPRA Employee Contribution 7,130.85 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000781 Bank Draft 0.00 7,324.07 INV0000574 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc PEPRA Employer Contribution 7,324.07 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000782 Bank Draft 0.00 16.74 INV0000575 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc PEPRA PERS Survivor Benefits Emplo… 16.74 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000783 Bank Draft 0.00 110.60 INV0000576 Invoice 06/05/2026 Misc PEPRA PERS Service Credit 110.60 0.00 2243 Moraga Police Managers Association 06/05/2026 DFT0000784 Bank Draft 0.00 70.00 INV0000577 Invoice 06/05/2026 MPMA Dues 70.00 0.00
16 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 6 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 1531 Moraga Police Officers Assn 06/05/2026 DFT0000785 Bank Draft 0.00 350.00 INV0000578 Invoice 06/05/2026 MPOA Dues 350.00 0.00
2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000786 Bank Draft 0.00 330.00 INV0000579 Invoice 06/05/2026 ROTH IRA Employee Contribution 330.00 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000787 Bank Draft 0.00 2,838.30 INV0000580 Invoice 06/05/2026 ROTH 457 Employee Contribution 2,838.30 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000788 Bank Draft 0.00 6,153.55 INV0000581 Invoice 06/05/2026 Safety Classic Employee Contribution 6,153.55 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000789 Bank Draft 0.00 7,644.60 INV0000582 Invoice 06/05/2026 Safety Classic Employer Contribution 7,644.60 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000790 Bank Draft 0.00 6.51 INV0000583 Invoice 06/05/2026 Safety Classic PERS Survivor Benefits Empl… 6.51 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000791 Bank Draft 0.00 4,580.02 INV0000584 Invoice 06/05/2026 Safety PEPRA Employee Contribution 4,580.02 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000792 Bank Draft 0.00 4,659.96 INV0000585 Invoice 06/05/2026 Safety PEPRA Employer Contribution 4,659.96 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/05/2026 DFT0000793 Bank Draft 0.00 4.65 INV0000586 Invoice 06/05/2026 Safety PEPRA PERS Survivor Benefits Empl… 4.65 0.00 0335 California State Disbursement Unit 06/05/2026 DFT0000794 Bank Draft 0.00 410.76 INV0000587 Invoice 06/05/2026 Child Support Payable 410.76 0.00 2241 IRS 06/05/2026 DFT0000795 Bank Draft 0.00 6,667.42 INV0000588 Invoice 06/05/2026 Medicare taxes 6,667.42 0.00 2241 IRS 06/05/2026 DFT0000796 Bank Draft 0.00 28,663.60 INV0000589 Invoice 06/05/2026 Federal taxes withheld 28,663.60 0.00 2240 Employment Development Department 06/05/2026 DFT0000797 Bank Draft 0.00 11,885.09 INV0000590 Invoice 06/05/2026 State Tax Payable 11,885.09 0.00 2241 IRS 06/05/2026 DFT0000798 Bank Draft 0.00 844.28
INV0000591 Invoice 06/05/2026 Social Security tax 844.28 0.00 0200 Balco Holdings, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000799 Bank Draft 0.00 105.50 23022006 Invoice 06/04/2026 Sec. Alm Monit. Svcs: Council Chambers 3… 105.50 0.00 0200 Balco Holdings, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000801 Bank Draft 0.00 114.00 23026849 Invoice 06/04/2026 Mon. Fee Fire: Hacienda 2100 Donald 114.00 0.00 0200 Balco Holdings, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000803 Bank Draft 0.00 289.48 23029995 Invoice 06/04/2026 Mon Fee Fire Council Chambers 335 Rheem 289.48 0.00 0200 Balco Holdings, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000804 Bank Draft 0.00 180.81 23007637 Invoice 06/04/2026 Sec Alm Mon Svc: Town Offices 329 Rheem 180.81 0.00 0579 De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000805 Bank Draft 0.00 137.01 597355762 Invoice 06/04/2026 Copier Lease: PW Contract: 500-50470361 137.01 0.00 0579 De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000807 Bank Draft 0.00 371.80 597355807 Invoice 06/04/2026 Copier Lease: PL 500-50407071 371.80 0.00 0200 Balco Holdings, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000809 Bank Draft 0.00 385.55 22993836 Invoice 06/04/2026 Monitoring Fee Fire: Library 1500 St Marys 385.55 0.00 2246 ODP Business Solutions LLC 06/11/2026 DFT0000811 Bank Draft 0.00 144.46 465183490001 Invoice 06/08/2026 Office Supplies 144.46 0.00 2266 Comcast Holdings Corporation 06/11/2026 DFT0000813 Bank Draft 0.00 632.23 17 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 7 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 8155 40 005 019… Invoice 06/08/2026 Internet Svcs: 329 Rheem 8155 40 005 01… 632.23 0.00 0215 Bay Area Drainage, Inc. 06/11/2026 DFT0000824 Bank Draft 0.00 10,090.00 2100315-2460 Invoice 06/04/2026 Memorial Cornhole Site Prep 5,890.00 0.00 2100315-2461 Invoice 06/04/2026 Commons Irrigation 4,200.00 0.00 2133 U.S. Bank Equipment Finance 06/11/2026 DFT0000825 Bank Draft 0.00 244.54 583382262 Invoice 06/04/2026 Copier Lease: PD Cont: 500-0670316-000 244.54 0.00 2246 ODP Business Solutions LLC 06/11/2026 DFT0000826 Bank Draft 0.00 20.19 467755792001 Invoice 06/11/2026 Office Supplies 20.19 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000837 Bank Draft 0.00 72.92 INV0000612 Invoice 06/05/2026 401A Employee Contribution 72.92 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/05/2026 DFT0000838 Bank Draft 0.00 18.70 INV0000613 Invoice 06/05/2026 Employee 457 Contribution 18.70 0.00 2241 IRS 06/05/2026 DFT0000846 Bank Draft 0.00 -21.62
CM0000037 Credit Memo 06/05/2026 Federal taxes withheld -21.62 0.00 2240 Employment Development Department 06/05/2026 DFT0000847 Bank Draft 0.00 -9.10 CM0000038 Credit Memo 06/05/2026 State Tax Payable -9.10 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/18/2026 DFT0000848 Bank Draft 0.00 1,228.08 INV0000614 Invoice 06/18/2026 401A Employer Contribution 1,228.08 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/18/2026 DFT0000849 Bank Draft 0.00 3,121.25 INV0000615 Invoice 06/18/2026 401A Employee Contribution 3,121.25 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/18/2026 DFT0000850 Bank Draft 0.00 1,711.04 INV0000616 Invoice 06/18/2026 Employee 457 Contribution 1,711.04 0.00 0210 BASIC Benefits LLC 06/18/2026 DFT0000851 Bank Draft 0.00 865.38 INV0000617 Invoice 06/18/2026 DCAP Employee Contribution 865.38 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/18/2026 DFT0000852 Bank Draft 0.00 10,906.21 INV0000618 Invoice 06/18/2026 457 Employee Contribution 10,906.21 0.00 0210 BASIC Benefits LLC 06/18/2026 DFT0000853 Bank Draft 0.00 1,019.89 INV0000619 Invoice 06/18/2026 FSA Employee Contribution 1,019.89 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000854 Bank Draft 0.00 4,784.64 INV0000620 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc Classic Employee Contribution 4,784.64 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000855 Bank Draft 0.00 3,453.63 INV0000621 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc Classic Employer Contribution 3,453.63 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000856 Bank Draft 0.00 7.44 INV0000622 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc Classic PERS Survivor Benefits Emplo… 7.44 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000857 Bank Draft 0.00 86.62 INV0000623 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc Classic PERS Service Credit 86.62 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000858 Bank Draft 0.00 7,174.06 INV0000624 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc PEPRA Employee Contribution 7,174.06 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000859 Bank Draft 0.00 7,368.44 INV0000625 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc PEPRA Employer Contribution 7,368.44 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000860 Bank Draft 0.00 16.74 INV0000626 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc PEPRA PERS Survivor Benefits Emplo… 16.74 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000861 Bank Draft 0.00 110.60 INV0000627 Invoice 06/18/2026 Misc PEPRA PERS Service Credit 110.60 0.00 2243 Moraga Police Managers Association 06/18/2026 DFT0000862 Bank Draft 0.00 70.00 18 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 8 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV0000628 Invoice 06/18/2026 MPMA Dues 70.00 0.00
1531 Moraga Police Officers Assn 06/18/2026 DFT0000863 Bank Draft 0.00 350.00 INV0000629 Invoice 06/18/2026 MPOA Dues 350.00 0.00
2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/18/2026 DFT0000864 Bank Draft 0.00 330.00 INV0000630 Invoice 06/18/2026 ROTH IRA Employee Contribution 330.00 0.00 2242 Mission Square Retirement Trust 06/18/2026 DFT0000865 Bank Draft 0.00 2,838.30 INV0000631 Invoice 06/18/2026 ROTH 457 Employee Contribution 2,838.30 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000866 Bank Draft 0.00 6,163.30 INV0000632 Invoice 06/18/2026 Safety Classic Employee Contribution 6,163.30 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000867 Bank Draft 0.00 7,656.72 INV0000633 Invoice 06/18/2026 Safety Classic Employer Contribution 7,656.72 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000868 Bank Draft 0.00 6.51 INV0000634 Invoice 06/18/2026 Safety Classic PERS Survivor Benefits Empl… 6.51 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000869 Bank Draft 0.00 4,575.89 INV0000635 Invoice 06/18/2026 Safety PEPRA Employee Contribution 4,575.89 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000870 Bank Draft 0.00 4,655.77 INV0000636 Invoice 06/18/2026 Safety PEPRA Employer Contribution 4,655.77 0.00 0338 CalPERS 06/18/2026 DFT0000871 Bank Draft 0.00 4.65 INV0000637 Invoice 06/18/2026 Safety PEPRA PERS Survivor Benefits Empl… 4.65 0.00 0335 California State Disbursement Unit 06/18/2026 DFT0000872 Bank Draft 0.00 410.76 INV0000638 Invoice 06/18/2026 Child Support Payable 410.76 0.00 2241 IRS 06/18/2026 DFT0000873 Bank Draft 0.00 7,347.64 INV0000639 Invoice 06/18/2026 Medicare taxes 7,347.64 0.00 2241 IRS 06/18/2026 DFT0000874 Bank Draft 0.00 30,393.36 INV0000640 Invoice 06/18/2026 Federal taxes withheld 30,393.36 0.00 2240 Employment Development Department 06/18/2026 DFT0000875 Bank Draft 0.00 12,488.98 INV0000641 Invoice 06/18/2026 State Tax Payable 12,488.98 0.00 2241 IRS 06/18/2026 DFT0000876 Bank Draft 0.00 3,157.16 INV0000642 Invoice 06/18/2026 Social Security tax 3,157.16 0.00 2132 U.S. Bank Corporate Payment Systems 06/18/2026 DFT0000877 Bank Draft 0.00 44,043.83 2026.06 Invoice 06/17/2026 Credit Card Payment: 2026.06 44,043.83 0.00 1697 PlaceWorks, Inc. 06/18/2026 DFT0000879 Bank Draft 0.00 -77.50 TNMO-06.0-4 CM Credit Memo 06/18/2026 Void Check #65105 Issued in Springbrook -77.50 0.00 2241 IRS 06/24/2026 DFT0000882 Bank Draft 0.00 1,521.16 INV0000643 Invoice 06/24/2026 Medicare taxes 1,521.16 0.00 2241 IRS 06/24/2026 DFT0000883 Bank Draft 0.00 8,091.87 INV0000644 Invoice 06/24/2026 Federal taxes withheld 8,091.87 0.00 2240 Employment Development Department 06/24/2026 DFT0000884 Bank Draft 0.00 3,440.18 INV0000645 Invoice 06/24/2026 State Tax Payable 3,440.18 0.00 2266 Comcast Holdings Corporation 06/25/2026 DFT0000885 Bank Draft 0.00 385.98 8155 40 005 021… Invoice 06/22/2026 Comcast 8155 40 005 0218278 385.98 0.00 2141 Unum Life Insurance Co. 06/22/2026 DFT0000888 Bank Draft 0.00 4,096.95 0425163-001 20… Invoice 06/22/2026 Disability Insurance: 2026.07 4,096.95 0.00 2157 Verizon Wireless 06/25/2026 DFT0000890 Bank Draft 0.00 240.08 19 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 9 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 6144986121 Invoice 06/22/2026 PD Data Cards Acct: 471243537-00005 240.08 0.00 2157 Verizon Wireless 06/25/2026 DFT0000892 Bank Draft 0.00 114.73 6144986120 Invoice 06/22/2026 PD/Code Enforcement Cell Phones 47124… 114.73 0.00 0827 Gopher Team 06/25/2026 DFT0000895 Bank Draft 0.00 320.00 869304 Invoice 06/22/2026 Pest Control - Rancho Laguna Park 2026.06 320.00 0.00 0827 Gopher Team 06/25/2026 DFT0000898 Bank Draft 0.00 599.00 869167 Invoice 06/22/2026 Pest Control - Commons Park 2026.06 599.00 0.00 2105 TK Elevator Corp. 06/25/2026 DFT0000900 Bank Draft 0.00 940.61 3009533294 Invoice 06/22/2026 Quarterly Elevator Maint 2026.06.01-08.31 940.61 0.00 2246 ODP Business Solutions LLC 06/25/2026 DFT0000902 Bank Draft 0.00 332.78 471466167001 Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 332.78 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000904 Bank Draft 0.00 518.87 8367275694-3 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity: Council Chambers 335 Rheem 518.87 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000906 Bank Draft 0.00 188.04 9622927397-2 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity: Parks 188.04 0.00 1945 Silicon Connections, LLC 06/25/2026 DFT0000908 Bank Draft 0.00 1,250.47 480048 Invoice 06/22/2026 Technology Replacement 1,250.47 0.00 1945 Silicon Connections, LLC 06/25/2026 DFT0000910 Bank Draft 0.00 8,863.00 480059 Invoice 06/22/2026 IT Svcs: 20206.04 8,863.00 0.00 1947 Small Business Benefit Plan Trust 06/17/2026 DFT0000912 Bank Draft 0.00 719.30 109256-0 2026.07 Invoice 06/22/2026 Vision Insurance: 2026.07 719.30 0.00 1945 Silicon Connections, LLC 06/25/2026 DFT0000915 Bank Draft 0.00 9,349.00 480065 Invoice 06/22/2026 IT Svcs: 2026.05 9,349.00 0.00 0210 BASIC Benefits LLC 06/25/2026 DFT0000917 Bank Draft 0.00 76.50 IN3771050 Invoice 06/22/2026 Bundled CDA Svcs Client ID 4622-9602-02… 76.50 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000921 Bank Draft 0.00 21.35 6905501381-2 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 PGE 6905501381-2 21.35 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000922 Bank Draft 0.00 2,739.42 8749324693-5 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 PGE 8749324693-5 2,739.42 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000925 Bank Draft 0.00 4,898.18 6504888173-7 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity: Town Hall 329 Rheem 4,898.18 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000927 Bank Draft 0.00 101.39 5255041609-4 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity Hacienda Pavilion 2100 Donald 101.39 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000928 Bank Draft 0.00 107.61 7234145569-8 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity: Hacienda LaSala 2100 Donald 107.61 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000930 Bank Draft 0.00 2,616.00 0751460593-5 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electric Library 1500 St Marys 2,616.00 0.00 0319 California Choice Benefit Administrators 06/17/2026 DFT0000931 Bank Draft 0.00 55,961.81 5142317 Invoice 06/01/2026 Medical Insurance: 2026.07 55,961.81 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000933 Bank Draft 0.00 144.08 3675757343-5 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 PGE 3675757343-5 144.08 0.00 0579 De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. 06/25/2026 DFT0000936 Bank Draft 0.00 234.41 597532711 Invoice 06/22/2026 De Lage Landon 500-50407083 234.41 0.00 0579 De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. 06/25/2026 DFT0000938 Bank Draft 0.00 409.90 20 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 10 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount 597532685 Invoice 06/22/2026 Copier Lease Town Hall Contract: 500-504… 409.90 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000941 Bank Draft 0.00 180.98 6440793656-2 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity: Streets/Signals 180.98 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000943 Bank Draft 0.00 14,523.40 0190988489-0 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity: Bundled Street 14,523.40 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000945 Bank Draft 0.00 2,554.86 1463449238-4 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity 2,554.86 0.00 2246 ODP Business Solutions LLC 06/25/2026 DFT0000947 Bank Draft 0.00 73.52 470197196001 Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 73.52 0.00 2246 ODP Business Solutions LLC 06/25/2026 DFT0000949 Bank Draft 0.00 31.14 470199455001 Invoice 06/22/2026 Office Supplies 31.14 0.00 1632 Pacific Gas & Electric 06/25/2026 DFT0000951 Bank Draft 0.00 74.12 8650812145-5 2… Invoice 06/22/2026 Electricity: Hacienda Casita 2100 Donald 74.12 0.00 2299 Pierre Riche 06/25/2026 DFT0000980 Bank Draft 0.00 4,000.00 002 Invoice 06/22/2026 Public Art Project - Pear 2nd Payment 4,000.00 0.00 1918 Sharp Electronics Corp. 06/04/2026 DFT0000981 Bank Draft 0.00 234.46 9005793942 Invoice 05/12/2026 Copy Chrg: PD Account: 793584 234.46 0.00 0579 De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. 06/25/2026 DFT0000982 Bank Draft 0.00 315.95 597532675 Invoice 06/22/2026 Plotter Lease Contract: 500-50421959 315.95 0.00 0305 Burke, Williams & Sorensen 06/25/2026 DFT0000983 Bank Draft 0.00 -2,912.00 360649 CM Credit Memo 06/25/2026 23-401 Correction -2,912.00 0.00 0305 Burke, Williams & Sorensen 06/25/2026 DFT0000985 Bank Draft 0.00 2,912.00 360649 DM Debit Memo 06/25/2026 23-401 and 23-201 Legal Fees: 05655-0136… 0.00 2,912.00 2133 U.S. Bank Equipment Finance 06/25/2026 DFT0000987 Bank Draft 0.00 -244.54 578942773 CM Credit Memo 06/25/2026 Correction Copier Lease: PD Cont: 500-06… -244.54 0.00 2133 U.S. Bank Equipment Finance 06/25/2026 DFT0000989 Bank Draft 0.00 244.54 578942773 DM Debit Memo 06/25/2026 Copier Lease: PD Cont: 500-0670316-000 244.54 0.00 1838 Rui Ding 06/25/2026 DFT0000991 Bank Draft 0.00 -1,080.00 INV0000122 CM Credit Memo 06/25/2026 Correction Winter 2026 Tai Chi Class -1,080.00 0.00 1838 Rui Ding 06/25/2026 DFT0000993 Bank Draft 0.00 1,080.00 INV0000122 DM Debit Memo 06/25/2026 Winter 2026 Tai Chi Class 1,080.00 0.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001031 Bank Draft 0.00 -800.00 INV-90869 CM Credit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move to fund… 0.00 -800.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001033 Bank Draft 0.00 -800.00 INV-90386 CM Credit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move to fund… 0.00 -800.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001035 Bank Draft 0.00 800.00 INV-90386 DM Debit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move from f… 800.00 0.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001037 Bank Draft 0.00 -800.00 INV-90673 CM Credit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move to fund… 0.00 -800.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001039 Bank Draft 0.00 800.00 INV-90673 DM Debit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move from f… 800.00 0.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001041 Bank Draft 0.00 800.00 INV-90869 DM Debit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move from f… 800.00 0.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001043 Bank Draft 0.00 -1,150.00 21 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 11 of 12
Vendor Number Vendor Name Payment Date Discount Amount Payment Type Payment Amount Number Payable # Post Date Payable Description Payable Amount Payable Type Discount Amount INV-90870 CM Credit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move to fund… 0.00 -1,150.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001045 Bank Draft 0.00 1,150.00 INV-90870 DM Debit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move from f… 1,150.00 0.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001047 Bank Draft 0.00 -800.00 INV-92590 CM Credit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move to fund… 0.00 -800.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001049 Bank Draft 0.00 800.00 INV-92590 DM Debit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move from f… 800.00 0.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001051 Bank Draft 0.00 -1,150.00 INV-92591 CM Credit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move to fund… 0.00 -1,150.00 0767 Flock Group, Inc 06/30/2026 DFT0001053 Bank Draft 0.00 1,150.00 INV-92591 DM Debit Memo 06/30/2026 23-414 Camera Replacement move from f… 1,150.00 0.00 Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Discount
Payment
Payment Type Count
Bank Code AP Bank Summary
Bank Drafts
EFT's
83 0
1 131
0 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
215 0.00
Payment
300,174.38

0.00 0.00
426,098.75

0.00 726,273.13
Payable
Count
112
0 0
132
0 244
22 Monthly Check Report Date Range: 06/01/2026 - 06/30/2026 7/1/2026 10:02:03 AM Page 12 of 12
All Bank Codes Check Summary
Payment Type Discount
Payment
Count Payment
Payable
Count
Regular Checks
Manual Checks
Voided Checks
Bank Drafts
EFT's
83 0
1 131
0 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
215 0.00
300,174.38

0.00 0.00
426,098.75

0.00 726,273.13
112
0 0
132
0 244
Fund Name Amount Period
Fund Summary
999 Pooled Cash 726,273.13 6/2026
726,273.13
23 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.2
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Amy Heavener, Town Clerk
Subject: Approval of Meeting Minutes for the June 10, 2026 Regular meeting: June 24, 2026 Special Closed Session and June 24, 2026 Regular meeting of the Moraga Town Council
Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Approval of Meeting Minutes for the June 10, 2026 Regular meeting: June 24, 2026 Special Closed Session and June 24, 2026 Regular meeting of the Moraga Town Council.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - DRAFT - JUN 10 2026 - TC Meeting Minutes - REG Attachment B - DRAFT - JUN 24 2026 - TC Closed Session Meeting Minutes - SPC Attachment C - DRAFT - JUN 24 2026 - TC Meeting Minutes - REG 24 Attachment A
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 1 June 10, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2026
DRAFT

MINUTES
5:30 PM
The following are minutes of the actions taken by the Town of Moraga Town Council. A full video recording of the meeting is available on the Town's website at:
https://livestream.com/moraga

TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBER
335 RHEEM BOULEVARD

MORAGA, CA

1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting was called to order at 5:31 PM by Mayor, Kerry Hillis.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Mayor Kerry Hillis, Vice Mayor Brian Dolan Councilmembers Lisa Maglio, Graham Thiel and Steve Woehleke Councilmembers Absent: None
Staff Present: Town Manager, Scott Mitnick, Asst Town Attorney, Denise Bazzano; Town Clerk, Amy Heavener; Public Works Director, Nate Levine; Parks & Recreation Director, Mackenzie Brady; Planning Director, Sonia Urzua; Police Chief, Jon King

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PRESENTATIONS
3A. Proclamation - Pride Month
Councilmembers read the proclamation aloud.

There were no public comments.
3B. Proclamation – Juneteenth
Councilmembers read the proclamation aloud.

There were no public comments.
25 Attachment A
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 2 June 10, 2026

4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
Public comments provided by Ellen Beans; Sophie Lu; K. Brown; Peggy Woehleke, John Greenblatt from Moraga Park Foundation.

5. ADOPTION OF MEETING AGENDA
ACTION:

Motion: Maglio / Second: Woehleke
The meeting agenda was adopted as presented.

Vote: (5-0)
There were no public comments.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Consideration of Consent Items Removed for Discussion None.

B. Acceptance of Consent Items
ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Dolan
Approved Consent Calendar as presented.

Vote: (5-0)
There were no public comments.

6.1 Receive Accounts Payable Claims for: May 1, 2026 - May 28, 2026 ($1,620,181.81).

6.2 Approval of Meeting Minutes for the May 27, 2026 Regular meeting of the Moraga Town Council.

6.3 Adopt a Resolution approving a Grading Permit (GR-05-24) and Hillside Development Permit (HDP-05-24) for a landslide repair and slope stabilization on predevelopment average slopes of 25% or greater to repair a hillside on properties owned by the Rancho Moraga Homeowners Association (APN 256-420-026), Woodminster Homeowners Association (APN 256-100-026), and Moraga Place Owners Association (APN 256-380-003).

6.4 Adopt a Resolution:

1. Approving the Amended and Restated Contra Costa Clean Water Program Agreement, effective July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2041; and

2. Authorizing the Town Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Town of Moraga, including minor non-substantive revisions as approved by the Town Manager and Town Attorney.

6.5 Adopt a Resolution:

Approving the Contra Costa Clean Water Program Inspection Activities Agreement among the Town of Moraga, Central Contra Costa Sanitary District, and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; and
26 Attachment A
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 3 June 10, 2026

1. Authorizing the Town Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Town of Moraga.

7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS ON ACTIVITIES
A. Councilmember Reports on AB1234 Activities, Councilmember Announcements Councilmember Thiel Attended the 1st Pride flag raising at Town Hall as well as Hacienda Nights. Looking forward to attending the summer concert series.

Vice Mayor Dolan Nothing to report.

Councilmember Maglio Attended the RecycleSmart Board meeting and the SMC Centennial Celebration committee meeting.

Councilmember Woehleke Nothing to report.

Mayor Hillis Met with community members regarding the Parks and Open Space Master Plan, attended the County Connections Operating and Scheduling meeting (Buses are free for teens under the age of 18 - this summer!) Mayor Hillis attended the Moraga Chamber of Commerce monthly meeting, participated in Cal Cities Transportation Communications Public Works Committee as well as attending the Contra Costa County Mayor’s conference. Mayor Hillis presided over the 1st Pride flag raising at Town Hall and attended the SouthWest Area Transportation Committee on behalf of Vice Mayor Dolan.

B. Town Manager
Town Manager Mitnick Deferred report to the end.

8. PUBLIC HEARING
None.

9. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
9A. Receive staff update on the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Master Plan and approve proposed schedule of future meetings.

Parks and Recreation Director, Mackenzie Brady presented the item.

Councilmembers asked clarifying questions.

Parks and Recreation Director, Mackenzie Brady and Town Manager Mitnick provided clarifying information.

Rob Pierson, Lisa Koltun, Patricia Shrader, Kathryn C., John Hoover, Steve Mazalka, Scott Bowhay, Lisa Tucker, Jack Meyers, Ed Cansino, Lynne Collins, Cathy Kantor, P. Stoltenberg, K. Brown, Mahrukh Chishty, William Carman, Donna Cansino.

Councilmembers provided final comments and deliberation. 27 Attachment A
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 4 June 10, 2026
ACTION:

Motion: Hillis / Second: Dolan
Approve Item 9A; the proposed schedule
Vote: (5-0)
Mayor Hillis called a recess at 8:06 PM
Mayor Hillis reconvened at 8:12 PM
9B. Adopt a Resolution establishing procedures for responding to disruption(s) of telephonic or internet services that provide two-way remote access for the public to attend and participate during public open meetings of Town Council. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54953.4 (SB 707).

Assistant Town Attorney, Denise Bazzano presented the item.

Councilmembers asked clarifying questions.

There were no public comments.

Councilmembers gave final comments.

ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Maglio
Approved Item 9B as presented.

Vote: (5-0)
9C. Receive a Public Works Department projects update report.

Public Works Director, Nate Levine presented the item.

Councilmembers asked clarifying questions.

There were no public comments.

Councilmembers gave final comments.

COUNCIL RECEIVED THE REPORT; THERE IS NO ACTION.

10. COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
None.

11. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
None.

12. TOWN MANAGER FOLLOW-UP AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
28 Attachment A
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 5 June 10, 2026
Town Manager Mitnick announced on June 16, 2026 will be the Fire Services Committee will occur in the Council chamber. Next Council meeting will occur on June 24, 2026.

13. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hillis adjourned the Town Council Regular meeting at 9:06 PM.

Respectfully submitted by:
__________________________________
Amy Heavener, CMC
Town Clerk
Approved by the Town Council:
__________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
29 Attachment B
__________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Special Meeting - Closed Session 1 June 24, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING – CLOSED SESSION
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 25, 2026

MINUTES
2:30 PM
The following are minutes of the actions taken by the Town of Moraga Town Council.

TOWN HALL - 329 RHEEM BLVD

PEAR CONFERENCE ROOM

MORAGA, CA

1. CALL TO ORDER
The special meeting was called to order at 2:30 PM by Mayor, Kerry Hillis.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Mayor Kerry Hillis, Vice Mayor Brian Dolan Councilmembers Steve Woehleke, Lisa Maglio,
Graham Thiel
Councilmembers Absent: None.

Staff Present: Town Attorney, Michelle Marchetta Kenyon Town Manager, Scott Mitnick

2. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
There were no public comments.

3. SPECIAL MEETING – CLOSED SESSION

PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Government Code Section 54957
Title: Town Manager
ACTION:

There were no reportable actions.

4. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hillis adjourned the Town Council Special Closed Session Meeting at 4:22 PM. 30 Attachment B
__________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Special Meeting - Closed Session 2 June 24, 2026 Respectfully submitted by:
__________________________________
Amy Heavener, CMC
Town Clerk
Approved by the Town Council:
__________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
31 Attachment C
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 1 June 24, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 2026
DRAFT

MINUTES
5:30 PM
The following are minutes of the actions taken by the Town of Moraga Town Council. A full video recording of the meeting is available on the Town's website at:
https://livestream.com/moraga

TOWN COUNCIL CHAMBER
335 RHEEM BOULEVARD

MORAGA, CA

1. CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM by Mayor, Kerry Hillis.

ROLL CALL
Councilmembers Present: Mayor Kerry Hillis, Vice Mayor Brian Dolan Councilmembers Lisa Maglio, Graham Thiel and Steve Woehleke Councilmembers Absent: None
Staff Present: Town Manager, Scott Mitnick, Asst Town Attorney, Denise Bazzano; Town Clerk, Amy Heavener; Public Works Director, Nate Levine; Parks & Recreation Director, Mackenzie Brady; Planning Director, Sonia Urzua; Police Chief, Jon King

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PRESENTATIONS
3A. Proclamation - National Immigrant Heritage Month
Councilmembers read the proclamation aloud.

Councilmembers provided comments.

Ellen Beans provided public comment.
3B. Proclamation - America's 250th and California’s 175th Anniversary Councilmembers read the proclamation aloud.

There were no public comments.

4. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION
There were no public comments.
32 Attachment C
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 2 June 24, 2026

5. ADOPTION OF MEETING AGENDA
ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Dolan
The meeting agenda was adopted as presented.

Vote: (5-0)
There were no public comments.

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Consideration of Consent Items Removed for Discussion None.

B. Acceptance of Consent Items
ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Dolan
Approved Consent Calendar as presented.

Vote: (5-0)
There were no public comments.

6.1 Adopt a Resolution:

Authorizing the Town Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Theis Engineering & Associates for consultant engineering services through June 30, 2027, in an amount not to exceed $128,000.

7. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS ON ACTIVITIES
A. Councilmember Reports on AB1234 Activities, Councilmember Announcements Councilmember Maglio Attended New Leadership at Saint Mary’s College which hosts young women across the state pertaining to politics and leadership.

Councilmember Woehleke Attended a stakeholder engagement meeting pertaining to Liveable Moraga Road and toured Moraga with new Town Planners.

Councilmember Thiel Participated in a corn hole “practice session” for upcoming Cal Cities cornhole tournament. Attended the PROS master plan session at Si Si Caffé as well as a visit to Rancho Laguna Park to check out the dog park during the designated dog park hours.

Vice Mayor Dolan Attended MOFD/Town of Moraga Fire Services Committee meeting.

Mayor Hillis Announced meeting will be adjourned in memory of the passing of former Moraga and Walnut Creek Mayor, Sue Rainy. Attended the Moraga Liaison meeting as well as attended the County Connections Board of Directors meeting. Mayor Hillis scheduled and attended his regular Coffee with the Mayor. Thanked donors of the “buy a rocket” fundraiser in support of the 4th of July celebration in the Town of Moraga.
33 Attachment C
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 3 June 24, 2026
B. Town Manager
Town Manager Mitnick Deferred report to the end.

8. PUBLIC HEARING
8A. 1. Conduct a Public Hearing regarding the levy of the proposed assessments for Assessment District 1979-1, Town of Moraga Street Lighting (District) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-27; and

2. Adopt a Resolution confirming the Engineer’s Report for the District, approving the District assessments and Assessment Diagram, and ordering the levy and collection of District Assessments for FY 2026-27.

Public Works Director, Nate Levine presented the item.

Council did not have any clarifying questions.

Mayor Hillis opened the Public Hearing.

There were no public comments.

Mayor Hillis closed the Public Hearing.

ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Dolan
Approve Item 8A as presented.

Vote: (5-0)
8B. Waive the first reading and introduce an ordinance amending Chapter 8.124 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Moraga Municipal Code to ensure consistency with current State ADU law, the Moraga 2040 General Plan, and the 2023–2031 Housing Element.

Assistant Planner, Cassius Carandang presented the item.

Councilmembers asked clarifying questions.

Town Manager, Mitnick provided additional information.

Mayor Hillis opened the Public Hearing.

Kathy Brown provided public comment and Town Manager Mitnick provided a response to the comment.

Mayor Hillis closed the Public Hearing.

Councilmembers provided final deliberation and requested additional information regarding noticing requirements included in the proposed Ordinance.

ACTION:

Motion: Woehleke / Second: Dolan
Approve Item 8B with modifications to 8.124.090(E) regarding noticing language to read “Upon receipt of application, the Planning Director shall mail a courtesy notice to all owners of abutting properties to notify them of the application. The notice shall state that there is no right of an aggrieved party to appeal the approval.” Vote: (4-1; Thiel)
34 Attachment C
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 4 June 24, 2026

9. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
9A. Receive information on the Town’s participation in the Senate District 7 ADU Accelerator Program to develop pre-approved ADU plans in partnership with Lafayette and Orinda.

Assistant Planner, Cassius Carandang presented the item.

Councilmembers asked clarifying questions.

There were no public comments.

Town Manager Mitnick provided additional information regarding the previous item.

COUNCIL RECEIVED THE REPORT; THERE IS NO ACTION.
9B. Receive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan community engagement update and provide input to staff.

Parks and Recreation Director, Mackenzie Brady introduced Madison Merrill from WRT who presented the item.

Councilmembers asked clarifying questions.

Laura Koob, Lisa Moffett, Lisa Tucker, Kathryn Carr, Ellery Jedlicka, Grant Jedlicka, Scott Bowhay, Melanie Bell, Rachel Parsons, Ken Christiansen and Kathy Brown.

Councilmembers provided comments and deliberation.

A majority of Councilmembers provided direction to eliminate specific items from consideration in the Parks and Open Space Master Plan: Pickleball, Stadium and Stadium Lights at Rancho Laguna Park.

COUNCIL RECEIVED THE REPORT AND PROVIDED DIRECTION TO STAFF.

Town Manager Mitnick made final comments on the item.

Mayor Hillis called for a 5 minutes recess at 8:45pm.

Mayor Hillis reconvened the meeting at 8:54pm.
9C. Receive an Economic Development Update Report.

Town Manager, Scott Mitnick presented the item.

Councilmembers asked clarifying questions.

There were no public comments.

COUNCIL RECEIVED THE REPORT; THERE IS NO ACTION.

Council adjourned due to meeting time restrictions at 9:29 PM.

The remaining items were not taken before council.

10. COUNCILMEMBER REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

11. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
35 Attachment C
________________________________________________________________________________ Town Council, Regular Meeting 5 June 24, 2026

12. TOWN MANAGER FOLLOW-UP AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hillis adjourned the Town Council Regular meeting at 9:29 PM Respectfully submitted by:
__________________________________
Amy Heavener, CMC
Town Clerk
Approved by the Town Council:
__________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
36 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.3
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Cassius Carandang, Assistant Planner, Sonia Urzua, Planning Director Subject: Adoption of an Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 8.124, Accessory Dwelling Units of Title 8 (Planning and Zoning) of the Moraga Municipal Code.

Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Waive the second reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Chapter 8.124 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Moraga Municipal Code to ensure consistency with current State ADU law, the Moraga 2040 General Plan, and the 2023–2031 Housing Element. Find the Ordinance exempt from review pursuant to section 15282(h) of the California Environmental Quality Act.

BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission previously considered the proposed ordinance on June 2, 2026, and recommended that the Town Council adopt it through Resolution No. 04-2026.

Additional background and supporting documentation for the proposed ordinance are included in the staff report for the Town Council's first reading, which is available under Item 8B of the June 24, 2026 Town Council agenda.

DISCUSSION
On June 24, 2026, the Town Council held a public hearing to consider the first reading and introduction of the proposed ordinance. The discussion led to a modification of Section

8.124.090(E) regarding procedures for ADUs and JADUs.

The Town Council directed staff to revise Section 8.124.090(E) to require the Planning Director to mail a courtesy notice to all owners of abutting properties upon receipt of an ADU or JADU application. The notice shall state that no aggrieved party has the right to appeal the approval of an ADU or JADU.

Following public comment and deliberation, the Town Council voted to waive the first reading 37 and introduce the ordinance, with modifications, by a vote of four in favor and one opposed.

The modifications to Section 8.124.090(E) have been incorporated into the draft ordinance (see Attachment A).

Staff recommends that the Council adopt the ordinance.

FISCAL IMPACT
None. Administrative costs will continue to be recovered through the existing ADU application deposit. ADUs exceeding 750 square feet of interior floor area will remain subject to Development Impact Fees under the Town's Master Fee Schedule.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
The ADU ordinance amendment is exempt from CEQA's provisions (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h), which exempts the adoption of local ordinances for Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs).

ALTERNATIVES

1. Do not waive the second reading, and do not adopt the proposed Ordinance.

2. Provide alternative direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
Once the Ordinance is adopted, it will go into effect in thirty (30) days (August 7, 2026).

Following adoption, the Town will submit the final ordinance to HCD within 60 days, update public-facing application materials and internal review checklists and continue processing ADU and JADU applications in accordance with State law and the amended ordinance.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Draft Ordinance to MMC Chapter 8.124
38

Page 1 of 17 ends

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. XX-2026
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.124, ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS, OF TITLE 8 (PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE MORAGA MUNICIPAL CODE (MMC)
WHEREAS, Town staff determined that the current Moraga Municipal Code (MMC) Chapter 8.124, Accessory Dwelling Units, required amendments to ensure compliance with State Law regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), and has prepared a draft Ordinance amending MMC Chapter 8.124 to bring the code into compliance with State Law; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Moraga 2040 General Plan and 2023–2031 Housing Element include policies and programs that support the creation of affordable housing, and a diverse range of housing types, and implementation actions, including amending the Town’s accessory dwelling unit regulations to ensure ministerial approval procedures are consistent with State law, and facilitating ADU production, compliance, and tracking throughout the Town; and
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed municipal code amendments related to ADUs, received the staff report and staff presentation, received comments from the public and interested parties, and discussed the matter; and
WHEREAS, the Moraga Planning Commission voted at its regular meeting on June 2, 2026, to adopt a resolution recommending that the Town Council approve the proposed ordinance amendment, including the revisions contained in the supplemental staff report dated June 2, 2026; and
WHEREAS, all required public notices for the June 24, 2026, Town Council public hearing on the proposed ordinance were published in the East Bay Times in accordance with California Government Code Sections 65090 and 65096; and WHEREAS, the Town Council voted at its public hearing on June 24, 2026, to waive the first reading and introduce the ordinance amendment, with modifications, and; WHEREAS, a summary of the proposed amendments to the Accessory Dwelling Unit ordinance was published in the East Bay Times in advance of the July 8, 2026 Town Council meeting, in accordance with California Government Code Section 36933.

Attachment A
39

Page 2 of 17 ends

NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Town Council of the Town of Moraga that:

SECTION 1. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the ADU ordinance amendment is exempt from the provisions of CEQA (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.), pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.17 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15282(h), which exempts the adoption of local ordinance for ADUs and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JADUs).

SECTION 2. Pursuant to Moraga Municipal Code Section 8.12.100, the Town Council hereby makes the following findings:
(a) The proposed Amendments to the Municipal Code are consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. The proposed code amendments will maintain the Town’s local development standard in compliance with State ADU Law and support the development of a diverse range of housing types within Moraga. They also implement General Plan policies that allow for the ministerial approval of ADUs and JADUs. In addition, the Housing Element includes programs and actions aimed at streamlining ADU approvals, and compliance with State ADU Law further advances those objectives. (b) In the case of a general land use regulation, the change proposed is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the land use district for which it is proposed. The proposed ordinance would maintain the Town’s local development standards for ADUs and JADUs in compliance with State ADU Law, providing a streamlined permitting process and procedures for the development of ADUs, which are permitted accessory residential uses in all zoning districts that allow residential development.
(c) A community need is demonstrated for the proposed change. The municipal code amendments would allow the Town to continue enforcing local development standards in compliance with State ADU Law facilitating the production of housing, which is urgently needed at the local and regional levels. ADUs can provide lower-cost housing opportunities for extended family members, young adults, students, seniors, caregivers, and other small households, while also providing an additional source of income for property owners.
(d) Its adoption will be in conformity with public convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. Adoption of the proposed amendments will promote public convenience and general welfare, allowing the Town to continue enforcing local development standards in compliance with State ADU Law. State Law requires a ministerial approval process for streamlined ADUs and JADUs, with specified objective standards, and local standards provided in this ordinance. Additionally, updating the municipal code to align with General Plan policies, Housing Element programs, and current State ADU Law represents sound planning and zoning practice. 40

Page 3 of 17 ends

SECTION 3: AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 8.124 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS) Chapter 8.124 (Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Moraga Municipal Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

Article 1. General Provisions

8.124.010 Purpose.

This chapter provides for the creation of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) in the town as required by state law, and in accordance with the Town's General Plan and Housing Element as a means to provide a variety of housing types to meet the town's projected housing needs. This chapter provides for the ministerial approval of ADUs and JADUs in areas zoned to allow residential uses. The Town encourages ministerial review of ADUs and JADUs when possible. This Ordinance also provides procedures and standards for review of accessory dwelling units that do not meet the ministerial requirements as set forth herein that are intended to increase opportunities for ADUs to be developed within the Town.

8.124.020 Definitions.
"Accessory dwelling unit," or "ADU," means a residential dwelling unit attached or detached from a primary unit, or entirely enclosed within an existing building, which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same parcel where an existing or proposed primary unit is situated. An accessory dwelling unit also includes the following:

A. An efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the California Health and Safety Code.

B. A manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the California Health and Safety Code.
"Adjacent to the parking spaces for the primary unit" means within fifteen (15) feet of the nearest edge of the parking structure (garage or carport) including any storage areas within the parking structure; or within fifteen (15) feet of a legal, uncovered parking space for the primary unit.
"Attached ADU" means an ADU that does not qualify as a fully contained ADU and that is located at least partially within a newly constructed expansion of, or addition to, an existing primary unit.
"Detached ADU" means an ADU that does not qualify as a fully contained ADU and that is located at least partially within new construction that is part of a physical structure which is detached from the primary unit. More specifically, a detached ADU is located within a newly and legally constructed separate accessory building, or a newly 41

Page 4 of 17 ends

constructed expansion of, or addition to, a pre-existing legally constructed separate accessory building.
"Primary unit" or "primary residence" means a single-family or multifamily residential dwelling unit that either exists on or is proposed for a lot zoned for any residential or mixed-use zone, either through a permitted use or a conditional use, and is constructed prior to or concurrently to the ADU or JADU. "Fully contained ADU" means an ADU which is established entirely within the preexisting building envelope of either (i) a primary unit, a multifamily building, or (ii) any other pre-existing, legally constructed building located upon any lot containing a primary unit.
"Interior livable space" means a space in a dwelling intended for human habitation, including living, sleeping, eating, cooking, or sanitation. "Junior accessory dwelling unit," or "JADU," means a residential dwelling unit that provides independent and permanent living facilities for one or more persons (including provisions for living, sleeping, and eating), is no more than five hundred (500) square feet of interior livable space, and is contained entirely within the building envelope of an existing or proposed primary unit. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall include either separate sanitation facilities, or sanitation facilities shared with the primary unit. If the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the primary structure, the property owner shall reside onsite in either the primary residence or the JADU. If the JADU has separate sanitation facilities, no owner-occupancy is required. The owner-occupancy requirement shall not apply if the property is entirely owned by another governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization.
"Multifamily building" for purposes of this Chapter 8.124 means a structure with two or more attached dwelling units on one lot.
"Outdoor living areas" means an area on the exterior of an ADU that is designed for human use or habitation including, but not limited to, a patio, deck, balcony or yard that can accommodate appurtenances including, but not limited to, a barbecue pit, an outdoor dining table, a hammock, a lounge chair, a bench or a spa. "Passageway" means a pathway that is unobstructed clear to the sky and extends from the street to one entrance of an ADU.
"Standard ADU" means an ADU applied for under Article 3 below "Streamlined ADU" or "JADU" means an ADU or "JADU" applied for under Article 2 below.
"Business day" means any day that Moraga Town Hall is open for business to the public.

8.124.030 Subdivision.

The primary unit and an ADU or JADU, as applicable, may not be sold separately from each other and no subdivision of land or air rights is authorized by this chapter. 42

Page 5 of 17 ends

8.124.040 Permit required.

No person shall develop, construct, cause to be rented, or occupy an ADU or JADU on any lot within the town unless a permit is obtained pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in this chapter.

8.124.050 Density and use.

To the extent required by state law, an ADU or JADU built in conformance with this chapter does not count towards the allowed density for the lot upon which the ADU or JADU is located and is a residential use that is consistent with the general plan and zoning ordinance.

8.124.060 ADUs authorized as part of new construction.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the town may authorize the construction of fully contained, and attached and detached ADUs as an accessory use to a single-family dwelling in conjunction with the approval of, or an amendment to, any of the following:

A. Design review approval of a new single-family dwelling.

B. A residential subdivision pursuant to the Moraga Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Map Act;
C. A planned development pursuant to Chapter 8.48; and
D. A conditional use permit, including, but not limited to, a conditional use permit for a single-family dwelling or dwellings within the MOSO open space district, provided that an application for a conditional use permit, or the amendment thereof, to permit the establishment of an ADU shall be processed as set forth in Section 8.124.170.

8.124.070 Impact fees.

All ADUs and JADUs shall be subject to any applicable impact fees adopted by the town, except as provided below.

A. No impact fee is required for an ADU that has seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of interior livable space or less, or a JADU that has five hundred (500) square feet of interior livable space or less.

B. Any impact fee that is required for an ADU that has more than seven hundred fifty (750) square feet of interior livable space must be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. (E.g., the interior livable space of the ADU divided by the interior livable space of the primary dwelling unit, multiplied by the fee amount charged for a new dwelling.) 43

Page 6 of 17 ends

For purposes of this section, "impact fee" has the same meaning as the term "fee" is defined in subdivision (b) of California Government Code Section 66000, except that it also includes fees specified in California Government Code Section 66477. “Impact fee” does not include any connection fee or capacity charge charged by a local agency, special district, or water corporation.

8.124.080 General requirements.

The following general requirements apply to all ADUs and JADUs.

A. No ADU or JADU is required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an ADU or JADU shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling or existing multifamily dwelling.

B. No passageway shall be required in conjunction with construction of an ADU unless mandated by the Americans with Disabilities Act or other state or federal safety code standard.

C. If the ADU or JADU will connect to an onsite water-treatment system, the owner must include with the application a percolation test completed within the last five years or, if the percolation test has been recertified, within the last ten years.

D. Prior to issuance of a building permit for a JADU, a deed restriction shall be recorded against the title of the property as required in Article 5 of this chapter.

No deed restriction shall be required for an ADU.

E. When an ADU is approved concurrently with a proposed primary unit, final occupancy of the ADU shall not be issued before final occupancy of the primary unit.

F. Rental Terms. No ADU or JADU shall be rented for a term of thirty (30) consecutive days or less.

8.124.090 Procedures
A. This section shall provide for and govern the ministerial review of applications for streamlined ADUs and JADUs under Article 2 and standard ADUs under Article 3.

B. Applications for streamlined ADUs and JADUs, and standard ADUs under this article shall be approved ministerially by the Planning Director without discretionary review, further design review, or public hearing, pursuant to the procedures set forth in this article.

C. No more than one standard attached or detached ADU shall be permitted per lot and must meet the general requirements in Section 8.124.080, the development standards in Section 8.124.130, the design standards in Section 8.124.140.

D. Procedure for Review.
44

Page 7 of 17 ends

(1) Within fifteen (15) business days after receiving an application, the planning director or designee shall determine whether the application is complete and provide written notice of the determination to the applicant. If the application is determined to be incomplete, the planning director shall provide the applicant with a list of incomplete items and a description of how the application can be made complete. If the planning director does not make a timely determination within fifteen (15) business days, the application shall be deemed complete. (2) Within sixty (60) calendar days after receiving a completed application, the planning director shall approve or deny an application through a ministerial review process and issue an ADU permit if the requirements of either Sections

8.124.080, 8.124.120, 8.124.130 and 8.124.140, as applicable, have been satisfied. If the planning director has not approved or denied the completed application within sixty (60) days, the application shall be deemed approved. If the planning director denies the application, the planning director shall return in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied.

The planning director shall deny an application for an ADU if the applicable requirements have not been satisfied.

E. Courtesy Notice. Upon receipt of application, the planning director shall mail a courtesy notice to all owners of abutting properties, to notify them of the application.

The notice shall state that there is no right of an aggrieved party to appeal the approval.

F. Right to Appeal. If a permit application is determined to be incomplete or is denied, the applicant may appeal that decision in writing to the planning commission, as applicable, in accordance with the provisions of Moraga Municipal Code Chapter

8.12, Article 4. The town shall provide a final written determination not later than sixty (60) business days after receipt of the applicant’s written appeal.

G. Notwithstanding the procedures in Sections 8.124.080(A)—(F) above, an applicant for an attached or detached ADU that does not meet both the development standards of Sections 8.124.130 and the design standards of Section 8.124.140, may seek discretionary approval of an ADU in accordance with the alternative procedures set forth in Article 4 of this chapter.

8.124.100 Exemption for hillside development permit.

ADUs qualifying for ministerial approval under Articles 2 and 3 of this Chapter that are proposed on any hillside lot or area are exempt from the hillside development permit requirements described in Chapter 8.136. Non-ministerial ADUs allowed under Article 4 of this chapter, grading in addition to that necessary for excavation of the footprint of the ADU, or other attached or detached buildings or structures proposed as part of an ADU are not exempt from the hillside development permit process when applicable. 45

Page 8 of 17 ends

8.124.110 Unpermitted ADUs and JADUs constructed before January 1, 2020.

The town shall not deny a permit for an unpermitted ADU or JADU that was constructed before January 1, 2020, for building code violations or because the ADU or JADU does not comply with state ADU law or a local ordinance, unless the town makes a finding that correcting the violation is necessary to protect the health and safety of the public or occupants of the structure, or the building is deemed substandard pursuant to Section 17920.3 of the Health and Safety Code.

Article 2. Streamlined ADUs and JADUs

8.124.120 Development standards for streamlined ADUs and JADUs.

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 66323, the town shall ministerially approve an application for a building permit within a residential or mixeduse zone to create any of following types of ADUs and JADUs, or any combination thereof ("Streamlined ADUs and JADUs”), that comply with the general requirements of Section 8.124.080 and the applicable standards described in subsections A through D.

A. Fully contained ADU. This subsection applies to ADUs created by converting existing space, as applicable below, whether within a single-family dwelling, accessory structure, or multifamily building.
(1) Conversion of an existing structure. One fully contained ADU may be established entirely within the building envelope of the primary unit or another pre-existing, legally constructed accessory building located on any lot, if it complies with the following standards:
a. The fully contained ADU shall have an exterior access independent from that of the primary unit. An addition of up to one hundred fifty (150) square feet is permitted if the expansion is limited to accommodating ingress and egress, with setbacks sufficient for fire and safety. For any fully contained ADU located on a second floor, any stairway, whether enclosed or open, needed to access that second floor ADU must be established entirely within the pre-existing building envelope of the primary unit or pre-existing, legally constructed, building within which the ADU is contained, or may be enclosed within an addition that does not exceed one hundred fifty (150) square feet.
b. A pre-existing legally constructed accessory building may be fully or partially converted into a fully contained ADU and no setback shall be required for a pre-existing legally constructed accessory building that is converted (or partially converted) to a fully contained ADU. (2) Conversion of non-livable space in a multifamily building. Multiple ADUs within portions of existing multifamily dwelling buildings that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, 46

Page 9 of 17 ends

passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each fully contained converted ADU complies with state building standards for dwellings. At least one fully contained converted ADU is allowed within an existing multifamily building or mixed-use building with existing dwelling units, and multiple fully contained converted ADUs shall be permitted up to twentyfive (25) percent of the number of existing multifamily dwelling units.

B. A JADU complying with the following standards:
(1) One JADU is allowed on a lot containing an existing single-family dwelling. (2) The owner of a parcel proposed for a JADU shall occupy as a principal residence either the primary unit or the JADU if sanitation facilities are shared.
(3) As set forth in Section 8.124.200, neither the JADU nor the primary unit shall be sold independently of each other.
(4) The JADU shall have a separate entrance from the main entrance to the primary dwelling. If the JADU does not include a separate bathroom, the JADU shall include an interior entrance to the main living area of the primary unit.
(5) The interior livable space of a JADU shall not be larger than five hundred (500) square feet.
(6) The JADU shall include an efficiency kitchen, requiring and limited to the following components:
a. A cooking facility with appliance(s); and
b. A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the JADU.
(7) No additional parking is required beyond that required for the primary unit, including when the JADU is converted from an attached garage.

C. One detached ADU, new construction with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling that complies with the following standards:
(1) The lot on which the ADU is located has a proposed or existing singlefamily dwelling. The lot may also contain a JADU permitted pursuant to Section 8.124.120.B and a fully contained ADU permitted pursuant to Section 8.124.120.A.
(2) The side and rear setbacks are at least four feet.
(3) The total interior livable space is not more than eight hundred (800) square feet.
(4) The height does not exceed the limits set forth in 8.124.130 subdivision E.

D. Detached ADUs on a lot that has an existing or proposed multifamily building, with the following standards:
47

Page 10 of 17 ends

(1) On a lot with an existing multifamily dwelling, up to eight (8) detached ADUs are permitted, provided that the number of ADUs does not exceed the number of existing units on the lot or on a lot with a proposed multifamily dwelling, no more than two (2) detached ADUs are permitted. (2) The side and rear setbacks are at least four feet.
(3) The height does not exceed the limits set forth in 8.124.130 subdivision E. (4) The ADUs are detached from the multifamily building.

Article 3. Standard ADUs

8.124.130 Development standards for standard attached and detached ADUs.

The following section applies to standard attached or detached ADUs that do not qualify as a streamlined ADU. An standard attached or detached ADU may be established upon any lot containing an existing or proposed primary unit in in any single-family residentially zoned district, planned development districts that allow singlefamily residential development, or MOSO or non-MOSO open space districts, if it complies with the following standards, as well as the general standards set forth in Section 8.124.080 and design standards set forth in Section 8.124.140:

A. Except as set forth in Section 8.124.130(C), a portion of an existing primary unit or a pre-existing legally constructed accessory building (or portion thereof) may be incorporated into an attached or detached ADU only if the side and rear setbacks and building separations are sufficient for fire safety.

B. Except as set forth in Section 8.124.130(C), any expansion of or addition to either an existing primary unit or a pre-existing legally constructed accessory building to accommodate an attached ADU or detached ADU shall meet all development standards of the zoning district in which it is located.

C. Notwithstanding any other standard set forth in this Section 8.124.130 no setback shall be required for an existing legally constructed garage that is fully or partially incorporated into an attached or detached ADU.

D. An attached or detached ADU shall have side and rear setbacks of at least four feet. Front yard setback requirements of the zoning district in which the attached or detached ADU is to be located shall apply. No setback shall be required for an existing living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions, including height, as an existing structure that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit.

E. The following height limitations shall apply to standard attached or detached ADUs:
(1) Detached ADUs: sixteen (16) feet on a lot with an existing or proposed singlefamily or multifamily dwelling. 48

Page 11 of 17 ends

(2) Detached ADUs near transit: eighteen (18) feet on a lot with an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily dwelling that is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code. An additional two (2) feet in height shall be allowed to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. (3) Detached ADUs on multifamily multistory lots: eighteen (18) feet on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling. (4) Attached ADUs: twenty-five (25) feet or the height limitation in the local zoning ordinance that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower. The ADU shall not exceed two stories.

A skirt wall (if any) shall be included in the maximum height measurement F. The area within the construction footprint of the attached or detached ADU, including the area required for the unit, associated grading, and outdoor living space, shall not have an average predevelopment slope greater than twenty (20) percent.

G. The cumulative volume of cut and/or fill for construction of the attached or detached ADU, exclusive of areas for building foundations and footings, shall not exceed two hundred (200) cubic yards.

H. The interior living area of an attached or detached ADU shall be at least one hundred fifty (150) square feet and shall not exceed 1,200 square feet. The square footage of an attached ADU shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the pre-existing interior living area of the primary unit, calculated before the addition of the attached ADU.

I. The attached or detached ADU shall have an external access separate from the primary unit, and an attached ADU may also have internal access to the primary unit.

J. No historic tree shall be removed for the purpose of establishing an ADU.

Native or orchard trees may be removed to provide for the location of an ADU, with a requirement that one 15-gallon tree of the same genus and species be planted on site per tree removed. The requirement to replant a native or orchard tree may be waived if the planning director determines that there is no appropriate location on site to plant a tree. Trees are defined in Moraga Municipal Code Section 12.12.020.

K. In addition to parking required for the primary unit, one off-street parking space measuring at least nine feet by nineteen (19) feet and not more than seventeen (17) feet by nineteen (19) feet, which may be open or covered, shall be provided for an attached or detached ADU, subject to the following requirements:
(1) The parking space for the attached or detached ADU shall be located adjacent to the parking spaces for the primary unit, and shall not be accessed by means of a driveway separate from that which accesses 49

Page 12 of 17 ends

required parking spaces for the primary residence, unless such access is specifically authorized by the Moraga Municipal Code. The size of the existing driveway curb cut shall not be increased, and no new driveway curb cut shall be created. The guest parking spaces required by Moraga Municipal Code Section 8.76.100(C) and (D) are not required for an accessory dwelling unit.
(2) The required parking space shall be surfaced with a permeable material that is approved by the planning director, except that a pre-existing nonpermeable driveway, paved parking area or new or existing covered parking space may be used. The required parking space may be located within required setback areas if it is uncovered. When required parking for the attached or detached ADU, other than tandem parking within an existing driveway, is located within a setback area, the planning director may require the parking be screened from off-site views with vegetation not less than thirty-six (36) inches in height above the parking surface.
(3) When a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of a fully contained, attached or detached ADU or converted to an attached or detached ADU, no replacement parking shall be required. (4) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Subsection 8.124.130(K), attached or detached ADUs are exempt from off-street parking space in any of the following circumstances:
a. The attached or detached ADU is located within one-half walking distance of a public transit stop.
b. The attached or detached ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.
c. When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the attached or detached ADU.
d. When there is a car share vehicle storage space, at which car shares may be picked up and dropped off, located within one block of the attached or detached ADU.
e. When the permit application for the ADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family or multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the ADU or the parcel satisfies any other applicable parking exemption criteria.
f. Nothing in this Section 8.124.130(K) shall be construed as requiring parking to be provided for a streamlined ADU.

8.124.140 Design standards for standard attached and detached ADUs.

This section sets forth design standards that must be met for the establishment of standard attached and detached ADUs in addition to the requirement to comply with the 50

Page 13 of 17 ends

general standards set forth in Section 8.124.080 and the development standards set forth in Sections 8.124.130. An attached or detached ADU must meet the following design standards:

A. Exterior colors and materials of the attached or detached ADU shall match or be consistent in type and quality with those used on the primary unit.

Architectural and landscape designs of the attached or detached ADU and its appurtenances (e.g. mailboxes) shall use the same or similar materials, colors, and design elements as the primary unit.

B. All exterior lighting shall be directed downward and/or inward toward the property.

C. Any new retaining walls necessary for the construction of the attached or detached ADU shall be no higher than three feet. If a fence is located within two feet of a retaining wall the combined retaining wall and fence height shall not exceed six feet. There shall be no more than two new retaining walls located within thirty (30) feet of one another in conjunction with the construction of the attached or detached ADU.

D. Any blank exterior wall proposed as part of the construction of the attached or detached ADU that is without windows and is more than fifteen (15) feet long or one hundred eighty (180) square feet in area, whichever is less, shall have landscaping installed and maintained along the wall which reaches a minimum height of four feet within three years.

E. Windows on any exterior wall proposed as part of the construction of the attached or detached ADU located within thirty (30) feet of a neighboring residence, where the windows would have sight lines to the neighboring residence, shall have a minimum sill height not less than five feet, six inches above the interior finished floor height. This requirement may be waived by the planning director for a window required for egress under the California Building Code.

F. The aggregate area of new deck(s), balcony(ies) or porch(es) for the attached or detached ADU shall not exceed one hundred twenty (120) square feet, and no such feature shall have a depth greater than eight feet. No deck, porch or balcony shall have a height more than twenty-four (24) inches above existing grade, measured to the top of the finished floor or deck surface.

G. Stairways constructed to access an attached or detached ADU with an upper landing floor height of more than six feet from natural grade shall be enclosed, except where all parts of the stairway are located more than thirty (30) feet from a property line or would not be visible from an adjacent property or public street.

H. The skirt height associated with the construction of the attached or detached ADU shall not exceed four feet.

I. There shall be a minimum of six feet near-level clearance area from any top or bottom of a slope associated with the construction of the attached or detached ADU. The post-development slope of the near-level clearance area shall not 51

Page 14 of 17 ends

exceed five percent. This requirement is also applicable to split-level lots, with the exception of the primary pad split.

Article 4. Procedures and Standards for Review of Accessory Dwelling Units Not Qualifying for Ministerial Review

8.124.150 Purpose.

The purpose of this article is to provide procedures and standards for the review and approval of ADUs that do not meet one or more of the development and/or design standards set forth in Sections 8.124.130 and 8.124.140, respectively. The intent of these procedures is to reasonably allow such units to be established, subject to discretionary review, even when they would not qualify for ministerial review and approval pursuant to the requirements of state law, thereby increasing the opportunities for ADUs to be developed in the town.

8.124.160 Applicability.

This article is only applicable to provide alternative processes to the statutory requirements for ministerial review, and to thereby provide for a system of discretionary review in a manner designed to increase opportunities for ADUs to be developed in the town beyond that which is required by state law. In no event shall this article be interpreted to expand or otherwise amend the requirements for ministerial review set forth in Article 3.

8.124.170 Conditional use permit procedures.

A proposed attached or detached ADU that an applicant seeks to establish that does not comply with the development standards set forth in Section 8.124.130 may be allowed subject to a conditional use permit. The applicant shall be required to obtain a building permit prior to the construction of any attached or detached ADU for which a conditional use permit is required, and shall also meet the requirements set forth in Article 5 of this chapter. Design review for such attached or detached ADUs may also be required pursuant to Section 8.124.180. An application for a conditional use permit (CUP) for an ADU subject to this Article 4 shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 8.12 of the Moraga Municipal Code, except as expressly set forth in this Section 8.124.170 and Section 8.124.180. In addition to the required findings set forth in Section 8.12.120, the following supplemental findings shall also be made prior to the issuance of a CUP for an attached or detached ADU:

A. The number of ADUs and JADUs on the lot shall not exceed the number allowed under Sections 8.124.120 and 8.124.140, as applicable. 52

Page 15 of 17 ends

B. The area within the development footprint of the proposed ADU, including the area required for the unit, associated grading, and outdoor living space, will not have an average predevelopment slope greater than twenty (20) percent.

C. The interior livable space of an attached or detached ADU shall be at least one hundred fifty (150) square feet and shall not exceed 1,200 square feet. The square footage of an attached ADU shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the pre-existing interior livable space of the primary unit, calculated before the addition of the attached ADU.

D. The square footage of an attached ADU shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the pre-existing interior livable space of the existing primary unit, calculated before the addition of the attached ADU, except that the foregoing limitation shall not restrict an attached ADU to less than eight hundred (800) square feet of interior livable space.

E. The ADU will comply with all of the required setbacks of the applicable zoning district.

F. The owner of the property upon which the ADU is located will occupy either the primary unit or the ADU, unless the applicant establishes by substantial evidence to the satisfaction of the planning director that strict application of the requirement on a temporary basis would constitute a hardship warranting an exemption to this requirement.

G. At least one dedicated off-street parking space for the ADU, which may be covered, uncovered, or provided as tandem parking, will be provided, except that no off-street parking space is required when one of the circumstances described in Section 8.124.130(K)(4) would apply,
H. The ADU complies to the extent practicable with the standards set forth in Sections 8.124.130 and 8.124.140.

I. Provisions have been made for a deed restriction as provided in Article 5 of this chapter to be recorded against the property.

8.124.180 Design review procedures.

An attached or detached ADU that does not comply with the design standards set forth in Section 8.124.140 shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures, and approved or denied pursuant to the standards, set forth in Moraga Municipal Code Chapter 8.72, the planning commission shall be the review body for design review approval following the procedure for review specified in Section 8.72.030(D) or Section 8.72.090, as applicable.
53

Page 16 of 17 ends

Article 5. Deed Restriction

8.124.190 Applicability.

The requirements of this Article 5 shall apply to JADUs only:

A. JADUs approved under Article 2.

8.124.200 Requirements.

Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a JADU, the property owner shall record in the office of the Contra Costa County Recorder a deed restriction setting forth the following requirements, in a form satisfactory to the planning director and the town attorney:

A. The primary unit and the JADU established on the same lot may not be sold independently of each other.

B. If the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the primary structure, the owner of the property shall reside in either the primary residence or the JADU as the owner’s principal residence. If the JADU has separate sanitation facilities, no owner-occupancy is required. The owner-occupancy requirement shall not apply if the property is entirely owned by another governmental agency, land trust, or housing organization.

C. The size and attributes of the JADU shall conform with the requirements of this chapter and state law.

D. The restrictions described in this Section 8.124.200 shall be binding upon any successor in ownership of the property and lack of compliance may result in legal action against the property owner.
[Next section begins on the following page]
54

Page 17 of 17 ends

SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance become effective thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.

SECTION 5: SEVERABILITY
If any provision of the Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provisions or applications of the Ordinance. To this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are severable. This Town Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.

SECTION 6: PUBLICATION
The Town Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in accordance with State law.

The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the Town Council of the Town of Moraga, California, held on June 24, 2026, and was adopted and ordered published at a regular meeting of the Town Council held on July 8, 2026, by the following vote:

Ayes:

Noes:

Abstain:

Absent:

Recused:
____________________________
Kerry Hillis, Mayor
___________________________________
Attest: Amy Heavener, Town Clerk
55 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.4
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Denise Bazzano, Assistant Town Attorney and Amy Heavener, Town Clerk Subject: Resolution Adopting the Town of Moraga’s Conflict of Interest Code for the Biennial Update
Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution Adopting the Town of Moraga’s Conflict of Interest Code for the Biennial Update.

BACKGROUND
The State of California Political Reform Act of 1974 (“Act”) (codified in Government Code Sections 8100 et seq.) requires the Town to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code (“Code”) applicable to designate Town employees and public officials. The Code is required to contain certain information, such as the list of designated positions and the disclosure categories for each position. Additionally, the Code is the legal document that sets out the filing deadlines, disqualification rules and the manner of reporting conflicts of interest.

A Code must generally achieve the following:

Provide reasonable assurance that all foreseeable potential conflict of interest situations will be disclosed or prevented;
Provide to each affected person a clear and specific statement of his or her duties under the conflict of interest code; and
Adequately differentiate between designated employees with different powers and responsibilities.

California Government Code 87306.5 requires that each local agency review and, if necessary, revise its Code in even-numbered years. The updated Code must be filed with the Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”) for review and approval.

The FPPC has adopted a regulation (2 Cal. Code of Regs. Sections 18730) that contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code, which can be incorporated by reference in an agency’s code. After public notice and a hearing, the standard code may be amended to 56 conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. The terms of California Code of Regulations section 18730, and any amendments to it duly adopted by the FPPC, may be incorporated by reference into a local agency’s Code.

Members of the Town Council and Planning Commission, Town Manager, Town Attorney, and Town Treasurer are required to file separately pursuant to Government Code section 87200, and are, therefore, are not listed in the Town’s Code. Section 87200 filings are submitted directly to the FPPC, although the Clerk retains copies for public inspection. (Gov. Code Sec. 87500.)
Pursuant to the Town’s Code, certain Town employees and consultants who hold positions that involve making or participating in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have a material effect on the holder’s financial interests must also file Statements of Economic Interest, Form 700. Individuals holding designated positions are required to file their Form 700 filings with the Town Clerk, who will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction. (Gov. Code Sec. 81008.)
In 2024, the Town Council voted to include the Art in Public Spaces Committee (APSC) members as designated positions in the Town of Moraga's Conflict of Interest Code. The Code lists all agency positions that involve the making or participation in making of decisions that “may foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest,” which may include volunteers on a committee if the members make or participate in making government decisions. (See Gov. Code Sec. 87302)(c).)

DISCUSSION
Staff has reviewed all of the Town’s committees and commissions to determine whether any of them participate in the decision-making process that could foreseeably have a material effect on any financial interest of the committee or commission member and the Town has decided that no additional changes to the Conflict of Interest Code are required at this time.

FISCAL IMPACT
There are no direct fiscal impacts associated with this agenda item.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
Adopting the proposed Resolution ratifying the Town's Conflict of Interest Code does not constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) (CEQA) as the proposed action does not have the potential to result in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15378.)

ALTERNATIVES

1. Make revisions to the proposed resolution ratifying the Town of Moraga’s Conflict of Interest Code for the Biennial Update; or

2. Provide alternate direction to staff.
57 NEXT STEPS
Upon approval of the proposed resolution, the Town Clerk will file the resolution with the Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”) for review and approval.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Draft Resolution - Updating Conflict of Interest Code 58 Attachment A
____________________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 1 July 08, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. xx-2024
ADOPTING THE TOWN OF MORAGA’S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE FOR THE

BIENNIAL UPDATE
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Government Code commencing with Section 87300, the Town Council is required to adopt and promulgate a Conflict of Interest Code; WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 87302, the Conflict of Interest Code shall provide for specific enumeration of the positions within the Town, other than those specified in Government Code Section 87200, which involve the making or participation in the making of decisions which may foreseeably have material effect on any financial interest and for each such enumerated position, the specific types of investments, business positions, interests in real property and sources of income which must be reported; and it is necessary to update the Conflict of Interest Code in even numbered years to comply with current law and to review designated classifications; WHEREAS, Moraga’s Conflict of Interest Code was originally adopted by Resolution No. 49-76;
WHEREAS, the Regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission, (Title 2, Division 6, California Code of Regulations) Section 18730, authorizes the adoption of the Conflict of Interest Code by incorporating Section 18730 by reference and designating the positions and disclosure categories to which the Code applies; and WHEREAS, the adoption of this resolution does not constitute a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq.) (CEQA) as the proposed action does not have the potential to result in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. (14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15378.).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Moraga as follows:

1. Conflict of Interest Code Adopted: The Town hereby adopts by reference the terms of Title 2 California Code of Regulations Section 18730(b) and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. This Resolution, the provisions of Section 18730(b) and any amendments and the attached Appendix “A,” designating positions and establishing disclosure requirements, shall constitute the Conflict of Interest Code for the Town of Moraga.
59 Attachment A
____________________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 2 July 08, 2026

2. Statement of Economic Interests: Individuals holding positions as designated in Appendix “A,” attached hereto, shall file statements of economic interests (Form 700) with the Town Clerk. The Town Clerk shall forward the original Form 700s filed by the Mayor, Members of the Town Council, Planning Commissioners, the Town Manager, the Town Attorney, and the Town Treasurer to the Fair Political Practices Commission pursuant to California Government Code Sections 87500. The Town Clerk shall retain a copy of all statements of economic interests and make them available for public inspection and reproduction in accordance with Government Code Section 81008.

3. Maintenance of Conflict of Interest Code: The Town Clerk shall maintain at all times one copy of the Town’s Conflict of Interest Code for examination by the public and shall cause the filing of such code in the manner required by law. 60 Attachment A
____________________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 3 July 08, 2026

APPENDIX A

DESIGNATED POSITIONS

DESIGNATED POSITIONS DISCLOSURE CATEGORY
Chief of Police .................................................................................................. 1, 2 Town Engineer/Director of Public Works .......................................................... 1, 2 Director of Administrative Services................................................................... 1, 2 Planning Director ............................................................................................. 1, 2 Superintendent of Public Works/Parks ............................................................. 1, 2 Parks and Recreation Director.............................................................................. 1 Town Clerk ........................................................................................................... 1 Art in Public Spaces Committee Members ........................................................... 1 Consultants/New Positions....................................................................................* *Individuals providing services as a Consultant as defined in Title 2 California Code of Regulations sections 18700.3 and 18734 or in a new position as defined in Regulation 18734 that make or participate in making governmental decisions shall disclose pursuant to the broadest disclosure category in this Code subject to the following limitation:

If the new position or consultant performs limited duties, the agency may tailor the disclosure requirements to the duties performed. The Town Manager (or designee) may determine in writing that, due to the range of duties or contractual obligations, it is more appropriate to assign a limited disclosure requirement. a. Not later than ten (10) days after the final approval of a newly created position, the department manager (or designee) shall submit to the Clerk a completed Fair Political Practices Commission Form 804 (Agency Report of New Positions), or subsequent form, which identifies the classification and disclosure categories. The Town Manager (or designee) will review the department’s recommendation and make the final determination. The Town Manager (or designee) determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code.
b. Not later than ten (10) days after an authorized Town representative has signed a consultant contract, the department manager (or designee) shall submit to the Clerk a completed Fair Political Practices Commission Form 805 (Agency Report of Consultants), or subsequent form, which identifies the consultant and disclosure categories. The Town Manager (or designee) will review the department’s recommendation and make the final determination. The Town Manager (or designee) 61 Attachment A
____________________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 4 July 08, 2026
determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this Conflict of Interest Code.

The following positions are not covered by this Conflict of Interest Code because they must file a Statement of Economic Interests pursuant to Government Code Section 87200 et seq. and, therefore, are listed for informational purposes only:

Members of the Town Council
Members of the Planning Commission
Town Manager
Town Attorney
Town Treasurer
An individual holding one of the above listed positions may contact the Fair Political Practices Commission for assistance or written advice regarding their filing obligations if they believe that their position has been categorized incorrectly. The Fair Political Practices Commission makes the final determination whether a position is covered by Government Code Section 87200.
62 Attachment A
____________________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 5 July 08, 2026

APPENDIX B

DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES
Category 1: Designated positions assigned to this category must report investments and business positions in business entities, management positions in nonprofits, and income, including receipt of gifts, loans, and travel payments, from sources of the type to provide goods, supplies, products, or services utilized by the Town.

Category 2: Designated positions assigned to this category must report interests in real property located within the Town or within two miles of the boundaries of the Town or within two miles of any land owned or used by the Town. 63 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.5
To: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers
From: Katie Bruner, Administrative Services Director
Subject: Establishing the Town’s Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Appropriations Limit Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution establishing the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Annual Appropriations Limit (Gann Limit).

BACKGROUND
Section 7910 of the California Government Code and by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (commonly referred to as the "Gann Initiative") requires Town Council to adopt a resolution that approves the Town’s annual budget appropriations limit for the fiscal year. This limit reflects the State’s constitutional spending amount allowable for California governmental agencies based on the Consumer Price Index and population growth. This staff report complies with this State reporting requirement.

DISCUSSION
There are two different factors that can be used to calculate the limit for FY 2026-27 which ends June 30, 2027. The factors are used as an adjustment for subsequent years to increase the limit and must be based on the following:

Factor #1: Either the change in California's Per Capita Personal Income factor or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year due to the addition of new nonresidential construction in the Town, whichever is higher.

Factor #2: Either the change in the Town’s own population or the change in population of the entire County, whichever is higher.

To calculate the FY 2026-27 appropriations limit, staff has selected the California Per Capita Personal Income for Factor #1. This factor is used since the FY 2026-27 local assessment information is not available from the County of Contra Costa at this time. The percentage change in the California Per Capita Personal Income over the prior year is an increase of 64 4.95%.

For the change in population, staff used -0.31% percent – representing the change in population for Contra Costa County, which is higher than the Town of Moraga’s population change of -0.58% for the period of January 1, 2025 to January 1, 2026 (provided by the State of California Department of Finance).

Based on staff’s calculation, the FY 2026-27 Appropriation Limit is $21,998,470 (Exhibit A). A resolution which authorizes the new Appropriation Limit for next year is attached. The actual budget subject to the limitation excludes self-supporting funds, capital improvement funds, capital outlay grant funds, and specific exclusions such as the Gas Tax Fund. The FY 2026-27 appropriations subject to the Gann Limit is $10,371,963. Therefore, the Town could appropriate an additional $11,626,507 before the legal limit would be reached.

FISCAL IMPACT
None. The draft resolution will establish the FY 2026-27 appropriations limit at $21,998,470.

For FY 2026-27, the Town will continue to maintain a comfortable margin between the appropriations limit and the Town’s appropriations subject to the Gann Limit.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
Establishing the annual appropriations (GANN) limit is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.), because it constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt the resolution with modifications.

2. Do not adopt the resolution and provide direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
None.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A and Exhibit A - Draft Resolution - Annual GANN Limit - FY27 65 Attachment A
Resolution No. XX-2026 1 July 08, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026

ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27
WHEREAS, the Article XIIIB of the State of California establishes a limitation on spending by cities of funds from proceeds of taxes; WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 7910, the Town Council must select the price factor and changes in the population factor to calculate the appropriations limit and establish the annual appropriations limit for the following fiscal year;
WHEREAS, the annual calculation of the appropriations limit shall be reviewed as part of the annual independent financial audit; and WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2026-27 appropriations subject to the limit is $10,371,963 and the calculated Fiscal Year 2026-27 appropriations limit is $21,998,470.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE

TOWN OF MORAGA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, HEREBY adopts the price factor as the California per capita personal income change of 4.95 percent and the Contra Costa County population percent change of -0.31 percent to calculate the appropriations limit of $21,998,470, as reflected in Exhibit A for the Fiscal Year 2026-27.
66 Resolution No. XX-2026 2 July 08, 2026
Exhibit A
Amount Sources
A. 2025-26 Appropriations Limit $21,026,086
B. Adjustment Factors

1. Population 0.9969 *State of California, Department of Finance

2. Per Capita Personal Income 1.0495 *State of California, Department of Finance Total Adjustment Factors 1.0462 *B1xB2
C. Annual Adjustment 972,384 Ax(B-1)
D 2026-27 Appropriations Limit $21,998,470 A+C
Fund 101 Tax Appropriations Subject to Tax Limit
Fund 101 Property Tax $ 6,241,453
Fund 101 Property Transfer Tax $ 206,000
Fund 101 Sales Tax-Bradley Burns $ 1,450,000
Fund 110 Sales Tax-Measure K $ 2,474,510
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT $ 10,371,963
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT $ 10,371,963
2026-27 Appropriations Limit $ 21,998,470
Over/(under) Appropriations Limit $ (11,626,507)
Percentage Over/(Under) Limit -53%

TOWN OF MORAGA

GANN APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2027
It should be noted that Appropriations Limit applies only to proceeds of taxes, as defined by the law and statewide reporting guidelines 67 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.6
To: Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers
From: Katie Bruner, Administrative Services Director
Subject: Correction to the Town’s Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Appropriations Limit Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution updating the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Appropriations Limit (Gann Limit).

BACKGROUND
Section 7910 of the California Government Code and by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (commonly referred to as the "Gann Initiative") requires Town Council to adopt a resolution that approves the Town’s annual budget appropriations limit for the fiscal year. This limit reflects the State’s constitutional spending amount allowable for California governmental agencies based on the Consumer Price Index and population growth. This staff report complies with this State reporting requirement.

Council originally adopted the GANN limit for FY 2025-26 as part the biennial budget adoption on June 25, 2025. Staff identified an error in the calculation for the GANN limit, and is bringing forward a corrected GANN limit calculation for FY 2025-26.

DISCUSSION
There are two different factors that can be used to calculate the limit for FY 2025-26 which ends June 30, 2026. The factors are used as an adjustment for subsequent years to increase the limit and must be based on the following:

Factor #1: Either the change in California's Per Capita Personal Income factor or the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year due to the addition of new nonresidential construction in the Town, whichever is higher.

Factor #2: Either the change in the Town’s own population or the change in population of the entire County, whichever is higher.
68 To calculate the FY 2025-26 appropriations limit, staff has selected the California Per Capita Personal Income for Factor #1. This factor is used since the FY 2025-26 local assessment information is not available from the County of Contra Costa at this time. The percentage change in the California Per Capita Personal Income to be used for FY 2025-26 is an increase of 6.44%.

For the change in population, staff used -0.30% percent – representing the change in population for Contra Costa County, which is higher than the Town of Moraga’s population change of -1.98% for the period of January 1, 2024 to January 1, 2025 (provided by the State of California Department of Finance).

Based on staff’s calculation, the FY 2025-26 Appropriation Limit is $21,023,977 (Exhibit A). A resolution which authorizes the new Appropriation Limit for next year is attached. The actual budget subject to the limitation excludes self-supporting funds, capital improvement funds, capital outlay grant funds, and specific exclusions such as the Gas Tax Fund. The FY 2025-26 appropriations subject to the Gann Limit is $10,076,122. Therefore, the Town could appropriate an additional $10,947,855 before the legal limit would be reached.

FISCAL IMPACT
None. The draft resolution will establish the FY 2025-26 appropriations limit at $21,023,977.

For FY 2025-26, the Town will continue to maintain a comfortable margin between the appropriations limit and the Town’s appropriations subject to the Gann Limit.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
Establishing the annual appropriations (GANN) limit is not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.), because it constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt the resolution with modifications.

2. Do not adopt the resolution and provide direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
None.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Exhibit A - Draft Resolution - Annual GANN Limit Correction - FY26 69 Attachment A
____________________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 1 July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026

CORRECTING THE ANNUAL GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 41-2025
WHEREAS, the Article XIIIB of the State of California establishes a limitation on spending by cities of funds from proceeds of taxes; WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 7910, the Town Council must select the price factor and changes in the population factor to calculate the appropriations limit and establish the annual appropriations limit for the following fiscal year;
WHEREAS, the annual calculation of the appropriations limit shall be reviewed as part of the annual independent financial audit; WHEREAS, the Town Council of Moraga adopted resolution 41-2025 establishing the GANN limit for Fiscal Year 2025-26;
WHEREAS, staff have corrected the calculation of the GANN limit for Fiscal Year 2025-26; and
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025-26 appropriations subject to the limit is $10,076,122 and the calculated Fiscal Year 2025-26 appropriations limit is $21,026,086.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE

TOWN OF MORAGA, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, HEREBY corrects the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 and adopts the price factor as the California per capita personal income change of 6.44 percent and the Contra Costa County population percent change of -0.30 percent to calculate the appropriations limit of $21,026,086, as reflected in Exhibit A for the Fiscal Year 2025-26.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Council hereby rescinds Resolution 41-2025 in its entirety.
70 Exhibit A
Amount Sources
A. 2024-2025 Appropriations Limit $19,813,373
B. Adjustment Factors

1. Population 0.9969 *State of California, Department of Finance

2. Per Capita Personal Income 1.0644 *State of California, Department of Finance Total Adjustment Factors 1.0611 *B1xB2
C. Annual Adjustment 1,210,604 Ax(B-1)
D 2025-2026 Appropriations Limit $21,023,977 A+C
Fund 101 Tax Appropriations Subject to Tax Limit
Fund 101 Property Tax $ 6,001,903
Fund 101 Property Transfer Tax $ 206,000
Fund 101 Sales Tax-Bradley Burns $ 1,400,000
Fund 213 Sales Tax-Measure K $ 2,468,219
TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT $ 10,076,122
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT $ 10,076,122
2025-2026 Appropriations Limit $ 21,023,977
Over/(under) Appropriations Limit $ (10,947,855)
Percentage Over/(Under) Limit -52%

TOWN OF MORAGA

GANN APPROPRIATION LIMIT CALCULATION
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2026
It should be noted that Appropriations Limit applies only to proceeds of taxes, as defined by the law and statewide reporting guidelines 71 CONSENT CALENDAR: 6.7
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Nate Levine, Public Works Director/Town Engineer
Subject: Award of Professional Services Agreement for Design Services for the Rheem Boulevard at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project (CIP 25-408) Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution:

1. Authorizing the Town Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Haley & Aldrich, Inc. for the Rheem Boulevard at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project (CIP 25- 408) in a total amount not to exceed $237,519, which includes the agreement amount of $215,927 and a ten percent contingency of $21,592; and

2. Authorizing the Town Manager or designee to authorize individual phases, optional/additional tasks, and use of contingency within the approved total not-to-exceed amount; and

3. Finding that the recommended action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is limited to consultant design and related professional services and does not approve construction or physical changes to the environment.

BACKGROUND
Rheem Boulevard near Chalda Way has experienced slope and roadway distress that requires evaluation and design of a permanent repair. The distress affects the public roadway and the adjacent embankment area, raising concerns about roadway stability, drainage, constructability, and long-term maintenance. See Attachment B for a Site Location Map. The Rheem Boulevard at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project (CIP 25-408) is intended to identify an appropriate repair approach, prepare design documents, and support future construction of the repair.

A geotechnical study was prepared for this location in 2016 and remains an important starting point for the project. However, the study is now nearly 10 years old, and additional slope and 72 roadway distress has occurred since then. For that reason, staff does not recommend relying on the 2016 study as the sole basis for final design.

The Town’s approach is to use the 2016 study as background information, confirm current site conditions, evaluate practical repair options, and develop a preferred repair concept before advancing to final design. This phased approach is intended to help the Town select a repair that is appropriately scoped for the actual site conditions and better understand the likely construction cost before committing to final design.

On May 14, 2026, the Town issued a Request for Proposals and Qualifications for professional design and geotechnical services for the project.

DISCUSSION
The Town received four proposals from Haley & Aldrich, Inc., ENGEO, Sandis, and SRM. A review team of staff engineers evaluated the proposals using a qualifications-based process.

Haley & Aldrich was ranked first by the review team and is recommended for award based on its project-specific understanding, prior site knowledge, relevant municipal landslide-repair experience, and a phased approach to verifying current conditions before advancing to final design.

Haley & Aldrich prepared the 2016 geotechnical report for this site, and the proposed team includes staff with direct knowledge of prior work. The firm also recognized that the 2016 report is important background but should not be the sole basis for final design because conditions have changed and the prior investigation has limitations. Haley & Aldrich also has relevant experience with local roadway landslides, slope stabilization, retaining walls, drainage, and plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) projects.

The proposed scope is structured to preserve the Town’s decision point before final design.

Phase 1 is intended to confirm current conditions, compare repair alternatives, and develop a 30% concept and cost estimate before the Town commits to final design.

This includes:

Phase 1 - background review, focused current-condition confirmation, alternatives evaluation, preferred repair recommendation, and 30% concept development; Optional Task 3A - focused additional investigation, if needed, which may include potholing, geophysics, borings, laboratory testing, inclinometer installation, and related investigation needed to confirm current conditions and support the preferred repair recommendation;
Phase 2 - final design and bid-ready PS&E, to proceed only after the Town accepts the preferred alternative/30% concept; and
Optional Phase 3 - bidding and construction support, to be authorized only if needed.

Staff recommends authorizing the full agreement and contingency now to provide flexibility if Phase 1 identifies a need for additional focused investigation or related support, while limiting 73 the initial notice to proceed to the base Phase 1 scope. Optional tasks, later phases, and use of contingency would require separate written authorization by the Town before Haley & Aldrich may proceed. This structure allows the Town to respond to the information developed during Phase 1 while maintaining control over cost and scope. The Phase 1 basis of design and 30% concept will identify the preferred repair approach and estimated construction cost before the Town decides whether to proceed to final design, adjust the scope, or plan for additional construction funding.

FISCAL IMPACT
Haley & Aldrich's agreement amount is $215,927. Staff recommends authorizing a 10% contract contingency of $21,592 for limited-scope refinements, unforeseen investigative needs, or related professional services that may be needed during project development, for a total authorization not to exceed $237,519.

The adopted FY 2025-26 and FY 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program includes $887,000 for CIP 25-408, funded by Measure K. The recommended total authorization is within the adopted project budget.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
The recommended action is limited to award of a professional services agreement for design, geotechnical evaluation, and related project development services. The action does not approve construction or any physical change to the environment, and therefore is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Environmental review for the eventual repair will be addressed as part of project development/design before construction approval, as applicable.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt the attached Resolution with modifications; or

2. Direct staff to negotiate with the next-ranked firm; or

3. Do not adopt the attached Resolution and provide direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
If the Resolution is adopted, staff will finalize and execute the professional services agreement with Haley & Aldrich and issue an initial notice to proceed for the base Phase 1 scope only.

Staff will review the Phase 1 basis-of-design findings, determine whether any optional investigation is needed, and use the preferred alternative and concept-level cost estimate to evaluate the likely construction funding requirement.

After the Town accepts the preferred repair alternative and 30% concept, staff may authorize Phase 2 final design within the approved total authorization. Phase 3 bidding and construction support would remain optional and would be authorized only if needed. Construction authorization, construction funding, and environmental review for the future repair would be addressed separately before construction proceeds.
74 ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - DRAFT Resolution - Rheem Chalda Slide Repair Attachment B - SiteMap
Attachment C - PSA Rheem Blvd Slide Repair Award
Attachment D - CIP 25-408 Budget Sheet
75 Attachment A
______________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 1 July 08, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026

A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MORAGA

AUTHORIZING THE TOWN MANAGER TO EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH HALEY & ALDRICH, INC. FOR THE RHEEM BOULEVARD AT CHALDA WAY SLIDE REPAIR PROJECT (CIP 25-408) IN A TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $237,519.

WHEREAS, Rheem Boulevard near Chalda Way has experienced slope and roadway distress affecting the public roadway and adjacent embankment area, requiring evaluation and design of a permanent repair;
WHEREAS, the Rheem Boulevard at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project (CIP 25- 408) is intended to identify an appropriate repair approach, prepare design documents, and support future construction of the repair;
WHEREAS, the Town issued a Request for Proposals and Qualifications on May 14, 2026, for professional design and geotechnical services for the project; and WHEREAS, the Town received four proposals from Haley & Aldrich, Inc., ENGEO, Sandis, and SRM, and a review team of staff engineers evaluated the proposals using a qualifications-based process;
WHEREAS, Haley & Aldrich, Inc. was ranked first by the review team and is recommended for award based on its project-specific understanding, prior site knowledge, relevant municipal landslide-repair experience, and phased approach to verifying current conditions before advancing final design; WHEREAS, the proposed scope includes Phase 1 basis-of-design work, optional focused additional investigation, Phase 2 final design and bid-ready plans, specifications, and estimate, and optional Phase 3 bidding and construction support; WHEREAS, Haley & Aldrich, Inc.’s agreement amount is $215,927, and staff recommends authorizing a ten percent contingency in the amount of $21,592, for a total authorization not to exceed $237,519;
WHEREAS, the adopted Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program includes funding for CIP 25-408, funded by Measure K, and the recommended authorization is within the adopted project budget; and WHEREAS, the recommended action is limited to approval of consultant design and related professional services and does not approve construction or physical changes to the environment.
76 Attachment A
______________________________________________________________________ Resolution No. xx-2026 2 July 08, 2026
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Moraga as follows:

1. The Town Council authorizes the Town Manager to execute a professional services agreement with Haley & Aldrich, Inc. for the Rheem Boulevard at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project (CIP 25-408) in a total amount not to exceed $237,519, which includes the agreement amount of $215,927 and a ten percent contract contingency of $21,592.

2. The Town Manager or designee is authorized to issue notices to proceed, authorize individual phases, authorize optional/additional tasks, and authorize use of contingency within the approved total not-to-exceed amount.

3. Optional/additional tasks, Phase 2 final design, Phase 3 bidding/construction support, and use of contingency require separate written authorization by the Town before Haley & Aldrich, Inc. may proceed.

4. Phase 2 final design shall proceed only after the Town accepts the preferred repair alternative and 30% concept developed through Phase 1.

5. The Town Council finds that this action is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is limited to approval of consultant design and related professional services and does not approve construction or physical changes to the environment. Environmental review for the eventual repair will be addressed as part of project development/design before construction approval, as applicable.

6. The Town Manager and Town staff are authorized to take all actions necessary to implement this Resolution, including execution of the agreement and any minor non-substantive revisions approved by the Town Manager and Town Attorney. 77 0 1,500 3,000
Feet
±
June, 2026
Rheem Boulevard at Chalda Way
Slide Repair Project (CIP 25-408)
Site and Location Map
Town of Moraga
Hall Dr
Campolindo Dr
Glo rie tta Blvd
As cot D r
Oak D r
Rheem Blvd
Mo raga Way
rietta
Blvd
Mulholland
Open Space
Preserve
Campolindo
High School
Camino Ricar do
Iv y
Dr
Camino Pablo
La r ch Ave
Canyon
Rd
Crossbrook Dr
Valley View
Dr
Ardith D r
Mo raga Rd
Miramonte High
School
Moraga
Country Club
YON
MORAGA
Pineh ur st Rd
Rime r
Dr
edwood
onal Park
Saint Marys
Rd
Sweet Dr
Wo odview D r
C
al le Kathr y n
Lafayette
Community Park
Las Trampas Creek
Rheem
Blvd
Bi r chwood Dr
Draege r D r
Moraga
Commons Park Saint Mary's
College of
California
Buckh orn Creek
Larch
Ave
Tha rp Dr
Rancho Laguna
Park
Camino Pablo
Elementary
School
Contra Costa County
Moraga
Town of
Moraga
Limits
California State Parks, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, Chalda Way
Chalda
Way
Attachment B
78 Attachment C
-1-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the 8 day of July, 2026 by and between the TOWN OF MORAGA, hereinafter called the “Town”, and Haley & Aldrich, Inc. hereinafter called the “Consultant.” Town and Consultant shall be sometimes collectively referred to as “Parties.” Recitals
WHEREAS, Town desires to obtain Engineering Design services in connection with Rheem Blvd at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project; and
WHEREAS, Consultant hereby represents and warrants to the Town that Consultant is fully qualified to perform the services described in Section 2 of this Agreement by virtue of specialized experience and training, education and expertise of its principals and employees.

Consultant further represents that it is willing to accept responsibility for performing such services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, Town desires to retain Consultant pursuant to this Agreement to provide the services described in Section 2 of this Agreement.

Agreement
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The Parties agree that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated as terms of the Agreement.

2. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set out in the “Scope of Work” attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.

3. Time of Performance. The services of the Consultant are to commence no sooner than July 8, 2026, and, subject to Town Council approval, be completed not later than December 31, 2027. Consultant shall perform its services in accordance with the schedule in Exhibit “B.” Any changes to these dates in either this Section 3 or Exhibit “B” must be approved in writing by the Town Manager or its representatives.

4. Compensation and Method of Payment.

A. Compensation. The compensation to be paid to Consultant, including both payment for professional services and reimbursable expenses, shall be at the rate and schedules attached hereto as Exhibit “C”. However, in no event shall the amount Town pays Consultant exceed Two Hundred and Fifteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty-Six Dollars ($215,927). Payment by Town under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of unsatisfactory work, even if such defects were known to the Town at the time of payment.
79 Attachment C
-2-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
B. Timing of Payment. Billing for said services shall be made once at the conclusion of the work and submittal of the records and any appropriate report. Town shall review Consultant’s billing statement and pay Consultant for services rendered within 45 days of receipt of a complete billing statement that meets all requirements of this Agreement.

C. Changes in Compensation. Consultant will not undertake any work that will incur costs in excess of the amount set forth in Section 4(A) without prior written amendment to this Agreement.

D. Taxes. Consultant shall pay all taxes, assessments and premiums under the federal Social Security Act, any applicable unemployment insurance contributions, Workers Compensation insurance premiums, sales taxes, use taxes, personal property taxes, or other taxes or assessments now or hereafter in effect and payable by reason of or in connection with the services to be performed by Consultant.

E. No Overtime or Premium Pay. Consultant shall receive no premium or enhanced pay for work normally understood as overtime, i.e., hours that exceed forty (40) hours per work week, or work performed during non-standard business hours, such as in the evenings or on weekends. Consultant shall not receive a premium or enhanced pay for work performed on a recognized holiday. Consultant shall not receive paid time off for days not worked, whether it be in the form of sick leave, administrative leave, or for any other form of absence.

F. Litigation Support. Consultant agrees to testify at Town’s request if litigation is brought against Town in connection with Consultant’s report. Unless the action is brought by Consultant or is based upon Consultant’s negligence, Town will compensate Consultant for the preparation and the testimony at Consult’s standard hourly rates, if requested by Town and not part of the litigation brought by Town against Consultant.

5. Amendment to Scope of Services. Town shall have the right to amend the Scope of Services within the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A, by written notification to the Consultant. In such event, the compensation and time of performance shall be subject to renegotiation upon written demand of either party to the Agreement. Failure of the Consultant to secure Town's written authorization for extra or changed work shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment in the contract price or time due, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, etc. for work done without the appropriate Town authorization.

6. Duties of Town. Town shall provide all information requested by Consultant that is reasonably necessary to performing the Scope of Services. Town retains all rights of approval and discretion with respect to assignment of any projects or undertakings contemplated by this Agreement.

7. Ownership of Documents. Title to all plans, specifications, maps, estimates, reports, manuscripts, drawings, descriptions and other final work products compiled by the 80 Attachment C
-3-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
Consultant under the Agreement shall be vested in the Town, none of which shall be used in any manner whatsoever, by any person, firm, corporation, or agency without the expressed written consent of the Town. Basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations, and other data prepared or obtained under the Agreement shall be made available, upon request, to the Town without restriction or limitations on their use. Consultant may retain copies of the above-described information but agrees not to disclose or discuss any information gathered, discussed or generated in any way through this Agreement without the written permission of Town during the term of this Agreement, unless required by law.

8. Employment of Other Consultants, Specialists or Experts. Consultant will not employ or otherwise incur an obligation to pay other consultants, specialists or experts for services in connection with this Agreement without the prior written approval of the Town. Any consultants, specialists or experts approved by Town are listed in Exhibit “D.”

9. Conflict of Interest.

A. Town and Consultant will comply with the requirements of the Town’s Conflict of Interest Code adopted pursuant to California Government Code §87300 et seq., the Political Reform Act (California Government Code §81000 et seq.), the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission (Title 2, §18110 et seq. of the California Code of Regulations), California Government Code §1090 et seq., and any other ethics laws applicable to the performance of the Services and/or this Agreement. Consultant may be required to file with the Town Clerk a completed Form 700 before commencing performance of the Services unless the Town Clerk determines that completion of a Form 700 is not required, pursuant to Town’s Conflict of Interest Code. Form 700 forms are available from the Town Clerk.

B. Consultant may not perform Services for any other person or entity that, pursuant to any applicable law or regulation, would result in a conflict of interest or would otherwise be prohibited with respect to Consultant’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with Town and to provide any necessary and appropriate information requested by Town or any authorized representative concerning potential conflicts of interest or prohibitions concerning Consultant’s obligations pursuant to this Agreement.

C. Consultant may not employ any Town official, officer or employee in the performance of the Services, nor may any official, officer or employee of Town have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code §1090 et seq. Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (12) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of Town. If Consultant was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of Town in the previous twelve months, Consultant warrants that it did not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement. Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in violation of Government Code §1090 et seq., the entire Agreement is void and Consultant will not be entitled to any compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services, including reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to reimburse Town for any 81 Attachment C
-4-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
sums paid to Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant understands that, in addition to the foregoing, penalties for violating Government Code §1090 may include criminal prosecution and disqualification from holding public office in the State of California.

10. Any violation by Consultant of the requirements of this provision will constitute a material breach of this Agreement, and the Town reserves all its rights and remedies at law and equity concerning any such violations. Liability of Members and Employees of Town. No member of the Town and no other officer, employee or agent of the Town shall be personally liable to Consultant or otherwise in the event of any default or breach of the Town, or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or any successor in interest, or for any obligations directly or indirectly incurred under the terms of this Agreement.

11. Indemnity.

A. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Consultant shall, at its own expense, indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to the Town, (which acceptance will not be unreasonably withheld), and hold harmless Town and its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers and any granting agency identified in any applicable Grant Agreement ("Indemnitees") from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, civil penalties and fines, expenses and costs (including, without limitation, claims expenses, attorney's fees and costs and fees of litigation) (collectively, "Liability") of every nature, whether actual, alleged or threatened, arising out of or in connection with the Services or Consultant's failure to comply with any of the terms of this Agreement, regardless of any fault or alleged fault of the Indemnitees.

B. If Consultant is a “design professional,” as defined in California Civil Code Section 2782.8(c), Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Indemnitees harmless against Liability only to the extent such Liability arises out of, pertains to, or relates to Consultant’s negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct. In such an event, the cost to defend charged to Consultant shall not exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

C. The obligations in this Section 11 shall survive termination of this Agreement.

12. Consultant Not an Agent of Town. Consultant, its officers, employees and agents shall not have any power to bind or commit the Town to any decision.

13. Independent Contractor. Consultant and Town agree that the Consultant will perform the Services as an independent contractor and not as an employee or agent of the Town.

Persons employed or utilized by Consultant in the performance of the Services will not be employees or agents of the Town and in the performance of the Consultant’s Services, Town shall have no control over the method or means of Consultant’s performance of the Services.

Consultant is solely responsible for the payment of employment taxes incurred under this Agreement and any similar federal or state taxes.
82 Attachment C
-5-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_

14. Compliance with Laws.

A. General. Consultant shall use the standard of care in its profession to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations. Consultant represents and warrants to Town that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to Town that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

B. Workers’ Compensation. Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of the California Labor Code which require every employee to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and Consultant certifies that it will comply with such provisions before commencing performance of this Agreement.

C. Prevailing Wage. Consultant and Consultant’s sub-consultants, shall, to the extent required by the California Labor Code, pay not less than the latest prevailing wage rates to workers and professionals as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations of the State of California pursuant to California Labor Code, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 2. Copies of the applicable wage determination are on file at the Town’s Public Works Department office.

D. Injury and Illness Prevention Program. Consultant certifies that it is aware of and has complied with the provisions of California Labor Code Section 6401.7, which requires every employer to adopt a written injury and illness prevention program.

E. Town Not Responsible. The Town is not responsible or liable for Consultant’s failure to comply with any and all of said requirements.

15. Confidential Information. All data, documents, discussions or other information developed or received by or for Consultant in performance of this Agreement are confidential and not to be disclosed to any person except as authorized by Town, or as required by law.

16. Insurance.

A. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of this Agreement the following minimum levels of insurance coverage:
(1) Consultant agrees to have and maintain, for the duration of this Agreement, a General Liability insurance policy insuring it and its firm to an amount not less than $2,000,000 (Two Million Dollars) combined single limit per occurrence and 83 Attachment C
-6-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
in the aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage with an aggregate limit of twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Consultant agrees to have and maintain for the duration of this Agreement an Automobile Liability insurance policy insuring it and its staff to an amount not less than $2,000,000 (Two Million Dollars) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant’s operations under this Agreement, whether such operations be by Consultant or by its employees, subcontractors, or subconsultants. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than $2,000,000 (Two Million Dollars) on a claims-made and annual aggregate basis. Consultant shall procure the professional errors and omissions liability insurance described herein and shall ensure that the policy provides and allows for a reporting period of at least four (4) years after the professional liability policy expires. A Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability policy written in accordance with the laws of the State of California and providing coverage for any and all employees of Consultant:
(a) This policy shall provide coverage for Workers’
Compensation (Coverage A).
(b) This policy shall also provide required coverage for Employers’ Liability (Coverage B.)
(4) All of the following endorsements are required to be made a part of each of the required policies, except for the Professional Liability and Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability policies, as stipulated below:
(a) “The Town of Moraga, its officers, officials,
employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects:
liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor products and completed operations of the Contractor, premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor: or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Town of Moraga, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.” (b) “This policy shall be considered primary insurance
as respects any other valid and collectible insurance the Town may possess, including any self-insured retention the Town may have, and any other insurance the Town does possess shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.” (c) “This insurance shall act for each insured and
additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each. This, however, will not act to increase the limit of liability of the insuring company.” 84 Attachment C
-7-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
(5) Consultant shall provide to the Town all certificates of insurance with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this paragraph.

Certificates of such insurance shall be filed with the Town on or before commencement of performance of this Agreement. The Town reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. (6) Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the Town, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(7) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made, or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
(a) All Coverages. Each insurance policy required
shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except after 30 days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Town. Current certification of such insurance shall be kept on file with the Town Manager at all times during the term of this Agreement.
(b) Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a Best’s rating of no less than A:VII. (c) Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any
deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Town. At the Town’s option, Consultant shall demonstrate financial capability for payment of such deductibles or self-insured retentions.

17. Assignment Prohibited. Neither the Town nor Consultant may assign any right or obligation pursuant to this Agreement. Any attempted or purported assignment of any right or obligation hereunder shall be void and of no effect.

18. Termination of Agreement.

A. This Agreement and all obligations hereunder, except for those indemnity obligations set forth in Section 11, may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, by the Town upon 5 days’ written notice to Consultant. Consultant may terminate this Agreement upon 30 days’ written notice to Town.

B. If Consultant fails to perform any of its material obligations under this Agreement, in addition to all other remedies provided by law, Town may terminate this Agreement immediately upon written notice.

C. Upon termination with or without cause, all finished and unfinished documents, project data and reports shall, at the option of the Town, become its sole property and shall, at Consultant’s expense, be delivered to the Town or to any party it may so designate.
85 Attachment C
-8-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
D. In the event termination is without cause, Consultant shall be entitled to any compensation owing to it hereunder up to the time of such termination, it being understood that any payments are full compensation for services rendered prior to the time of payment; provided, however, that Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for work in progress at the time of termination.

19. Suspension. The Town shall have the authority to suspend this Agreement and the services contemplated herein, wholly or in part, for such period as he/she deems necessary due to unfavorable conditions or to the failure on the part of the Consultant to perform any provision of this Agreement. Consultant will be paid for satisfactory Services performed through the date of temporary suspension. In the event that Consultant's services hereunder are delayed for a period in excess of six (6) months due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control, Consultant's compensation shall be subject to renegotiation.

20. Amendment. This Agreement and all exhibits referenced herein constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the agreement between Town and Consultant shall supersede any previous agreements, whether verbal or written, concerning the same subject matter.

This Agreement may be amended or extended from time to time by written agreement of the parties hereto.

21. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be interpreted as though it was a product of a joint drafting effort and no provisions shall be interpreted against a party on the ground that said party was solely or primarily responsible for drafting the language to be interpreted.

22. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.

23. Written Notification. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail. Any such notice, demand, etc. shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth hereinbelow. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to Town: Nate Levine, Public Works Director/Town Engineer Town of Moraga
329 Rheem Blvd
Moraga, CA 94556
If to Consultant: Mark Myers, Principal-in-Charge
Haley & Aldrich, Inc.___________
201 N. Civic Drive, Ste. 220_______
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

24. Consultant’s Books and Records.
86 Attachment C
-9-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
A. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to Town for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant.

B. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.

C. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the Town Attorney, Town Auditor, Town Manager, or a designated representative of any of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to Town for inspection when it is practical to do so.

Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for receipt of notices in this Agreement.

D. Town may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to Town and that the records and documents be maintained in the Town Manager’s office. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

25. Equal Employment Opportunity. Consultant is an equal opportunity employer and agrees to comply with all applicable state and federal regulations governing equal employment opportunity. Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, age, sex, creed, color, sexual orientation, marital status or national origin. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are treated during such employment without regard to race, age, sex, creed, color, sexual orientation, marital status or national origin. Such action shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:
employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; lay-offs or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consultant further agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

26. Town Not Obligated to Third Parties. Town shall not be obligated or liable for payment hereunder to any party other than the Consultant.

27. Waiver. No failure on the part of either party to exercise any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver of any other right or remedy that party may have hereunder.

28. Severability. If any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, then such provision or 87 Attachment C
-10-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
provisions shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions hereof, and such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had not been contained herein.

29. Exhibits. The following exhibits are attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by this reference:

Exhibit A: Scope of Services
Exhibit B: Schedule
Exhibit C: Compensation
Exhibit D: Other Consultants, Specialists or Experts Employed by Consultant Exhibit E: Liability and Insurance Requirements

30. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

31. News Releases/Interviews. All Consultant and subconsultant news releases, media interviews, testimony at hearings and public comment shall be prohibited unless expressly authorized by the Town.

32. Venue. In the event that suit shall be brought by either party hereunder, the parties agree that trial of such action shall be held exclusively in a state court in the County of Contra Costa, California.
88 Attachment C
-11-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Town and Consultant have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

TOWN OF MORAGA CONSULTANT
By:
__________________________________
By:
__________________________________
Scott Mitnick,
Town Manager
Name:
_________________________________
Title:
_________________________________
__________________________________
Amy Heavener
Town Clerk
Address:
_________________________________
_________________________________
Phone No:
_________________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:
__________________________________
Michelle Marchetta Kenyon,
Town Attorney
FUNDING:

By:
__________________________________
Katie Bruner,
Administrative Services Director
89 Attachment C
-12-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services
Insert
Haley & Aldrich’s proposed scope follows the Town’s
preliminary scope and phased structure. We propose
to complete
Phase 1 first, then proceed to later phases only if
authorized by the Town. Recommended
refinements, assumptions,
exclusions, optional tasks, and contingent work
items are identified at the end of this section.

TASK 1 – PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND

COORDINATION
Haley & Aldrich will provide project management
and
coordination throughout the authorized phases. Our
project manager, Eli Zane, PE, GE will serve as the
primary
point of contact for the Town and will manage the
Haley &
Aldrich team, subconsultants, schedule, budget,
deliverables, quality reviews, and coordination with
affected parties.

Project management will include:
» Kickoff meeting with Town staff.
» Baseline work plan, schedule, and task-level
budget.
» Regular coordination with Town staff.
» Subconsultant coordination.
» Budget and schedule tracking by task and phase.
» Quality assurance and quality control reviews.
» Tracking of key assumptions, risks, decisions, and
action
items.

Deliverables
» Kickoff meeting agenda and summary notes.
» Baseline work plan, schedule, and task-level
budget.
» Periodic schedule and status updates.
» Meeting agendas and action-oriented notes.
» Updated risk, assumption, and decision log.

Phase 1 – Basis of Design and
30 Percent Concept
TASK 2 – EXISTING INFORMATION REVIEW AND
SITE

RECONNAISSANCE
Haley & Aldrich will review available information to
establish the factual baseline for Phase 1. This
review will
include the 2016 CE&G report, prior repair records,
available record drawings, available utility
information,
Town-provided photographs, CIP information, and
other
relevant documents provided by the Town.

Haley & Aldrich will perform site reconnaissance
using
ground-level methods and UAS aerial imagery to
observe
and document:
» Pavement cracking and vertical separation.
» Sidewalk, curb, and gutter distress.
» Slope deformation and surface cracking.
» Drainage features and evidence of surface-water
concentration.
» Temporary tarps or covers.
» Existing retaining walls and prior repair limits.
» Access, traffic, and staging constraints.
» Visible utility features and potential conflicts.

We will compare current distress with the 2016
mapping
to identify where conditions have expanded,
changed, or
appear to be controlled by different mechanisms.
90 Attachment C
-13-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
Deliverables
» Existing information review summary.
» Annotated site photographs and reconnaissance
notes.
» Updated description of visible distress and likely
constraints.
» List of missing information and recommended
follow-up
actions.

TASK 3 – SUPPLEMENTAL SURVEY,

INVESTIGATION,

AND UTILITY VERIFICATION
Haley & Aldrich will perform or manage
supplemental field
work needed to evaluate alternatives and prepare a
defensible Basis of Design Memorandum. This task
will
focus on updating the project team’s understanding
of
current site conditions, confirming key assumptions,
and
identifying data gaps before the Town selects a
preferred
repair alternative.

The RFP/Q states that the 2016 CE&G report should
be
used as background information, not as the sole
basis for
final design. The RFP/Q directs the selected
consultant to
determine the field investigation, geotechnical
analysis,
survey, utility verification, materials evaluation, and related work needed to support the recommended
repair
alternative and design. The supplemental work is
expected
to include:
» Updated topographic survey and base mapping.
» Field mapping of current distress and prior repair
limits.
» Compare current distress limits with the 2016
mapping
and prior repair information.
» Utility records review and coordination with utility
owners.
» Utility locating, verification, and potholing.
» Evaluation of existing drainage infrastructure,
including
historical subdrains and drainage facilities identified in
previous plans.
» Camera inspection of accessible storm drainage
and
subdrain facilities, as possible, to assess condition,
offsets, and functionality.
» Documentation of drainage, utility, access, rightof-way, and constructability constraints.
» Identify whether the available records, updated
survey,
field mapping, utility review, potholing, and drainage
inspection provide a sufficient basis to compare
repair
alternatives and recommend a preferred concept.

The base Task 3 scope includes drainage inspection,
accessible drainage camera inspection, utility
locating, and
targeted potholing needed to support the Phase 1
alternatives evaluation. The base Task 3 scope does
not
assume that borings, geophysical exploration,
laboratory
testing, or instrumentation are automatically
required
before the alternatives evaluation can proceed.

Instead,
Haley & Aldrich will first complete the focused field
evaluation, survey, utility review, potholing, and
drainage
inspection described above. If that work confirms
the
assumptions needed to compare alternatives and
recommend a preferred repair concept, Haley &
Aldrich
will proceed with the alternatives evaluation without
additional subsurface exploration.

OPTIONAL TASK 3A – CONTINGENT SUBSURFACE

EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION
For cost proposal purposes, optional subsurface
exploration and specialty evaluation will be
identified as
Task 3A. Haley & Aldrich will recommend Task 3A
only if
the base Task 3 work identifies data gaps that could
materially affect alternative selection, cost,
constructability, or the 30 percent concept design.

Potential triggers for Task 3A may include evidence
of
deeper-seated movement, uncertainty in depth to
91 Attachment C
-14-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
competent bedrock, apparent groundwater or
seepage
conditions, utility trench conditions that may
influence
movement, or uncertainty that cannot be resolved
through the base Task 3 field mapping, survey, utility
potholing, and drainage inspection.

If authorized by the Town, Task 3A may include one
or
more of the following optional services, depending
on the
specific data gap to be resolved:
» Exploratory borings to evaluate fill thickness,
depth to
competent bedrock, soil and bedrock conditions, and
potential groundwater or seepage conditions.

Assumes
traffic control is not needed.
» Laboratory testing of selected soil or bedrock
samples,
if needed to support design parameters or compare
repair alternatives.
» Seismic refraction, multichannel analysis of surface
waves, or similar geophysical methods to estimate
depth to bedrock, lateral variability in subsurface
conditions, or potential zones of weaker material.
» Installation of an inclinometer in a boring if active movement monitoring is warranted or if the Town
may
defer construction and would benefit from
movement
data before final design.
» Private utility location before subsurface
investigation.
(The locator has multiple tools to identify utilities
including ground penetrating radar (GPR). It greatly
improves safety and can find abandoned lines not
marked and/or lines when USA fails to mark lines.)
Haley & Aldrich will not proceed with Task 3A
services
without prior Town authorization. If Task 3A is
recommended, Haley & Aldrich will first provide the
Town
with a brief written recommendation describing the
identified data gap and how the purposed
investigation
work will reduce uncertainty and provide benefit to
the
Town for this project. We can also clarify if the
estimated
cost is accurate or if the cost is less based on the
final
recommended investigatory method. We will also
clarify
the schedule of the work and impacts to project
timeline.

This decision-based approach is intended to include
the
field work most likely to affect repair selection in the base
scope, while preserving flexibility to obtain
additional data
should our opinion be that additional effort will
reduce
uncertainty and provide benefit to the project that
exceeds the cost of additional work.

We will also let the Town know if we have enough
data for
our analysis, but that additional work can be
completed to
reduce uncertainty to bidders and thus reduce
project cost
and change order potential should the project move
forward.

Under all scenarios, we will communicate our
observations
and opinions to the Town to collaboratively move
the
project through design with well thought out
defensible
recommendations.

Deliverables
» Survey and base mapping suitable for Phase 1
decisionmaking
and concept development.
» Technical summary of supplemental investigation
results.
» Updated existing conditions summary.
» Preliminary utility and physical constraints
documentation.
» Summary of base Task 3 utility locating, potholing,
and
drainage inspection results.
» Written recommendation for optional Task 3A
exploration or specialty evaluation, if warranted.
» Technical summary of Task 3A results, if Task 3A is
authorized by the Town.

TASK 4 – AGENCY, UTILITY, AND PROPERTY

COORDINATION
Haley & Aldrich will perform focused coordination
with
92 Attachment C
-15-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
utility owners, affected agencies, and adjacent
property
owners as needed to understand conflicts, access
constraints, permit issues, relocation needs, and
potential
easement requirements. We do not anticipate the
need to
coordinate with agencies such as SFRQCB, USACE,
and
CDFWS that are typically responsible for water
quality and
stream activities.

During Phase 1, this coordination will remain at a
feasibility and concept level unless the Town
authorizes
additional detail.

Deliverables
» Coordination log or summary.
» Preliminary matrix of utility conflicts, access
constraints,
permit issues, and probable easement or right-ofway
needs.
» List of issues requiring follow-up during later
phases, if
authorized.

TASK 5 – ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION AND DRAFT

BASIS OF DESIGN MEMORANDUM
Haley & Aldrich will develop and evaluate practical
repair
alternatives based on current site conditions,
updated
field data, Town priorities, and probable
construction cost.

The 2016 alternatives will be considered as
important
background, but they will not be automatically
carried
forward without review. Potential alternatives may
include:
» No-build or maintenance-only option.
» Stabilization piles and grade beam.
» Lightweight fill alternative using geofoam, cellular
concrete, foam glass aggregate, or similar materials.
» Geogrid-reinforced fill.
» Hybrid stabilization and roadway reconstruction
concepts such as a pile-supported MSE retaining
wall.
» Drainage improvements.
» Pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter
reconstruction.
» Other alternatives identified during Phase 1.

The conceptual alternatives that we anticipate
considering
are presented on the following pages together with
preliminary construction cost estimates. Alternatives
will be compared using criteria that matter to
the Town’s decision:
» Technical performance.
» Ability to reduce future movement of the road
embankment.
» Constructability.
» Utility impacts.
» Traffic handling.
» Drainage improvements.
» Right-of-way or easement needs.
» CEQA and permitting considerations.
» Construction duration.
» Planning-level construction cost.
» Long-term maintenance.
» Risk and uncertainty.

Deliverables
» Draft Basis of Design Memorandum.
» Alternative comparison matrix.
» Planning-level construction cost estimates for
principal
alternatives.
» Town review meeting to discuss the Draft Basis of
Design Memorandum and select the preferred
option.

TASK 6 – 30 PERCENT CONCEPT DESIGN AND

REFINED

PRELIMINARY COSTING
After the Town reviews the Draft Basis of Design
Memorandum and selects a preferred repair
approach,
Haley & Aldrich will prepare a 30 percent concept
design
package for the Town-selected alternative.

The 30 percent package will include partially
developed
plans and an outline of technical specifications that
define:
» Proposed limits of work.
» Major design assumptions.
» Likely construction approach.
» Utility and drainage considerations.
» Traffic handling assumptions.
» Access and staging assumptions.
» Right-of-way or easement considerations.
» Major risks and unresolved issues.
» Refined preliminary opinion of probable
construction
cost.
93 Attachment C
-16-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
We anticipate that the 30% concept design plans will
include up to approximately 10 partially completed
sheets.

The plans sheets will be prepared using AUTOCAD
and our
standard municipal projects template upon approval
by
the Town, with the intent of extending the plan set
to the
subsequent design levels. The 30% concept design
plans
will be included as 11x1-inch sheets attached to the
Final
Basis of Design Memorandum.

The Final Basis of Design Memorandum will
document the
selected alternative, the basis for selection, major
assumptions, unresolved risks, and recommended
next
steps for CEQA, permitting, utility coordination,
easements, and final design.

Deliverables
» 30 percent concept plans and exhibits.
» Refined preliminary opinion of probable
construction
cost.
» Matrix of key assumptions, risks, and
recommended
next steps.
» Final Basis of Design Memorandum.
» Phase 1 compilation of project management
materials.

Phase 2 – Final Design, If
Authorized
TASK 7 – CEQA SUPPORT
If authorized, Haley & Aldrich will support the Town
in
determining and preparing the appropriate level of
California Environmental Quality Act documentation
for
the selected repair alternative. The RFP/Q notes that
a
CEQA exemption may be possible, but the selected
alternative may require a different CEQA path
depending
on the repair footprint and potential impacts.

Deliverables
» Draft and final CEQA support materials consistent
with
the authorized environmental pathway.
» Technical project description and exhibits.
» Meeting or hearing support materials, if
requested.

TASK 8 – FINAL DESIGN THROUGH BID-READY PS&E
If authorized, Haley & Aldrich will advance the
selected
30% concept through final design and prepare
design
calculations, bid-ready plans, technical
specifications, and
engineer’s estimate. Design submittals are expected
at 60
percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent or bid-ready
levels,
consistent with the.

Final design documents are anticipated to include:
» Geotechnical and structural design calculations.

Alternatives will be compared using criteria that
matter to
the Town’s decision:
» Technical performance.
» Ability to reduce future movement of the road
embankment.
» Constructability.
» Utility impacts.
» Traffic handling.
» Drainage improvements.
» Right-of-way or easement needs.
» CEQA and permitting considerations.
» Construction duration.
» Planning-level construction cost.
» Long-term maintenance.
» Risk and uncertainty.

Deliverables
» Draft Basis of Design Memorandum.
» Alternative comparison matrix.
» Planning-level construction cost estimates for
principal
alternatives.
» Town review meeting to discuss the Draft Basis of
Design Memorandum and select the preferred
option.

TASK 6 – 30 PERCENT CONCEPT DESIGN AND

REFINED

PRELIMINARY COSTING
After the Town reviews the Draft Basis of Design
Memorandum and selects a preferred repair
approach,
Haley & Aldrich will prepare a 30 percent concept
design
package for the Town-selected alternative.

The 30 percent package will include partially
developed
94 Attachment C
-17-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
plans and an outline of technical specifications that
define:
» Proposed limits of work.
» Major design assumptions.
» Likely construction approach.
» Utility and drainage considerations.
» Traffic handling assumptions.
» Access and staging assumptions.
» Right-of-way or easement considerations.
» Major risks and unresolved issues.
» Refined preliminary opinion of probable
construction
cost.

We anticipate that the 30% concept design plans will
include up to approximately 10 partially completed
sheets.

The plans sheets will be prepared using AUTOCAD
and our
standard municipal projects template upon approval
by
the Town, with the intent of extending the plan set
to the
subsequent design levels. The 30% concept design
plans
will be included as 11x1-inch sheets attached to the
Final
Basis of Design Memorandum.

The Final Basis of Design Memorandum will
document the
selected alternative, the basis for selection, major
assumptions, unresolved risks, and recommended
next
steps for CEQA, permitting, utility coordination,
easements, and final design.

Deliverables
» 30 percent concept plans and exhibits.
» Refined preliminary opinion of probable
construction
cost.
» Matrix of key assumptions, risks, and
recommended
next steps.
» Final Basis of Design Memorandum.
» Phase 1 compilation of project management
materials.

Phase 2 – Final Design, If
Authorized
TASK 7 – CEQA SUPPORT
If authorized, Haley & Aldrich will support the Town
in
determining and preparing the appropriate level of
California Environmental Quality Act documentation
for
the selected repair alternative. The RFP/Q notes that
a
CEQA exemption may be possible, but the selected
alternative may require a different CEQA path
depending
on the repair footprint and potential impacts.

Deliverables
» Draft and final CEQA support materials consistent
with
the authorized environmental pathway.
» Technical project description and exhibits.
» Meeting or hearing support materials, if
requested.

TASK 8 – FINAL DESIGN THROUGH BID-READY PS&E
If authorized, Haley & Aldrich will advance the
selected
30% concept through final design and prepare
design
calculations, bid-ready plans, technical
specifications, and
engineer’s estimate. Design submittals are expected
at 60
percent, 90 percent, and 100 percent or bid-ready
levels,
consistent with the.

Final design documents are anticipated to include:
» Geotechnical and structural design calculations.

Plans extended from the 30% conceptual design
sheets
that include, as appropriate:
› Stabilization piles, retaining structures, reinforced fill,
or other selected repair elements.
› Pavement reconstruction.
› Sidewalk, curb, and gutter replacement.
› Drainage improvements.
› Utility conflict resolution.
› Erosion control.
› Traffic handling.
› Construction staging.
» Technical specifications and bid schedule
recommendations. The technical specifications will
be
prepared to use Caltrans Standard Specifications as
the
standard specifications for the project and will
interface
with the “front end” specifications to be prepared
and
provided by the Town.
95 Attachment C
-18-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
Deliverables
» 60 percent design package.
» 90 percent design package.
» 100 percent or bid-ready technical package.
» Final engineer’s estimate.
» Final comment-response log.

Phase 3 – Optional Bidding and
Construction Support, If
Authorized
TASK 9 – BIDDING SUPPORT
If authorized, Haley & Aldrich will provide technical
support during bidding. This task will be treated as
an
optional not-to-exceed allowance, consistent with
the
RFP/Q. Should the actual services needed appear to
be
likely to exceed the allowance, we will coordinate
with the
Town to adjust the allowance as needed.

We anticipate providing the following services:
» Attending a pre-bid meeting or site walk.
» Responding to bidder questions.
» Preparing draft technical addenda language.
» Preparing conformed technical documents after
award,
if requested.

Deliverables
» Written responses to bidder questions.
» Draft technical addenda, if needed.
» Pre-bid meeting and site walk attendance.
» Conformed technical documents, if requested.

TASK 10 – CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
If authorized, Haley & Aldrich will provide technical
engineering support during construction. This task
will also
be treated as an optional not-to-exceed allowance,
consistent with the RFP/Q. Should the actual
services
needed appear to be likely to exceed the allowance,
we
will coordinate with the Town to adjust the
allowance as
needed.

We anticipate providing the following services:
» Attending the preconstruction meeting and
selected
construction meetings.
» Reviewing RFIs, submittals, and proposed
substitutions.
» Providing limited field observations.
» Supporting punch-list and final-walk activities.
» Reviewing record drawings, if requested.
» Assisting with technical review of potential claims
or
warranty issues related to the design.

Deliverables
» Meeting attendance and technical
correspondence.
» RFI and submittal reviews as requested by the
Town or
its construction manager.
» Field observation notes and daily field reports, if
requested.
» Punch-list and final-walk support.
» Record drawing review support, if requested.

Recommended Refinements,
Assumptions, Exclusions, and
Optional Items

RECOMMENDED REFINEMENTS
Haley & Aldrich recommends that Phase 1 be treated
as a
true decision-gate phase. Task 6 should not begin
until the
Town has reviewed the Draft Basis of Design
Memorandum and directed the preferred alternative
to be
advanced. This matches the RFP/Q and helps the
Town
avoid spending design funds on an infeasible or
unaffordable (unimplementable) concept.

We also recommend that the supplemental
investigation
remain targeted to the current distress area and the
information needed for alternative selection. The
work
should not become a broader corridor study unless
the Town identifies additional distress outside the
current
project limits.

It is possible that our findings from the supplemental
work
noted above for Phase 1 may support considering an
additional single day of subsurface exploration work
to
refine design of the repairs. If that is found to be the case,
we will provide additional geotechnical exploration
consisting of one boring up to 50 feet deep with the
possibility of including an inclinometer in the
borehole.

We recommend that consideration be given to
installing
96 Attachment C
-19-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_
an inclinometer in one of the borings to be
completed in
Phase 1 Task 3. This will enable monitoring of the
site over
an extended period of time should the cost of full
implementation of a repair be delayed due to cost
considerations. The monitoring information could be
used
to refine the repair plans, as warranted, prior to
actual
construction of the repairs. We have
providedadditional
cost information regarding this potential additional
work
as Task 3A.

ASSUMPTIONS
The baseline scope of work presented assumes that
our
proposed supplemental geotechnical investigation
work
noted will be sufficient to inform design of the
repairs
without the need for additional subsurface
exploration.

The proposed scope assumes that the Town will
provide
available background documents, prior repair
records,
photographs, utility information, right-of-way
information,
and record drawings. It assumes that Phase 1 field
investigation will be limited to the level of survey,
utility
CCTV inspection and utility verification needed to
support
alternatives evaluation and a 30 percent concept
design.

The scope also assumes that agency, utility, and
property
coordination during Phase 1 will remain at a
feasibility
level. Detailed utility relocation design, easement
acquisition documents, and full permit applications
will be
completed only if authorized in a later phase or as
additional services.

EXCLUSIONS
The proposed scope excludes:
» Exhaustive corridor-wide geotechnical exploration.
» Full utility relocation design during Phase 1.
» Detailed right-of-way acquisition services.
» Hazardous materials investigation.
» General public outreach.
» Construction management.
» Full-time construction inspection.
» Materials testing during construction.
» Services related to unknown contaminated soil or
groundwater unless separately authorized.

OPTIONAL OR CONTINGENT WORK ITEMS
Optional or contingent work may include:
» Additional borings or geophysical work if initial
field
work identifies deeper or wider instability than
anticipated.
» Geotechnical instrumentation if active movement
monitoring is needed.
» Hazardous materials or naturally occurring
asbestos
evaluation if suspect materials are encountered.
» Additional environmental studies if the selected
alternative does not qualify for an exemption.
» Detailed utility relocation design.
» Easement exhibits or legal descriptions.
» Expanded bidding or construction support.
97 Attachment C
-20-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_

EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Performance
The services of the Consultant are to commence no sooner than July 8, 2026, and, subject to Town Council approval, be completed not later than December 31, 2027 98 Attachment C
-21-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_

EXHIBIT C
Cost Proposal
Attached
99 Fee Proposal For
Rheem Blvd at Chalda Way Slide Repair Project
(CIP 25-408)
Town of Moraga Senior Principal Program Manager / Senior Technical Expert Technical Expert Project Manager/Senior Technical Specialist Technical Specialist Staff Engineer 2 Project Support Hours Cost LCC Surveying, Inc. Subtronic Corporation Traffic Control Drilling Permit Private Utility Location Drilling/Geophysical Subcontractor Laboratory Testing Truck Rate Subtotal Cost $395.00 $345.00 $270.00 $230.00 $230.00 $180.00 $125.00 $158 Task 1: - Project Management and Coordination
Kickoff Meeting 2 2 2 6 $ 1,690.00 $ - $ 1,690.00
Work Plan and Schedule 2 4 10 4 20 $ 4,570.00 $ - $ 4,570.00 Budget and Schedule Tracking 2 4 6 $ 1,190.00 $ - $ 1,190.00 Meetings, Agendas, Minutes, Action Items (Assume 3) 3 6 9 $ 2,190.00 $ - $ 2,190.00 Subtotal Hours 6 9 18 8
Subtotal Cost $ - $ 2,070.00 $ 2,430.00 $ - $ 4,140.00 $ - $ 1,000.00 Task 2 - Existing Information Review, Site Reconnaissance and Mapping Review Existing Documents 2 4 4 10 $ 2,180.00 $ - $ 2,180.00 JHA and Field Coordination 1 2 1 4 $ 815.00 $ - $ 815.00 Site Reconnaissance and Field Mapping & Mark for USA 2 6 4 12 $ 2,790.00 $ 158.00 $ 158.00 $ 2,948.00 Summary of Data Gaps Memo 1 2 10 4 17 $ 3,905.00 $ 158.00 $ 158.00 $ 4,063.00 Subtotal Hours 3 4 1 22 12 1
Subtotal Cost $ - $ 1,035.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 230.00 $ 5,060.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 125.00 Task 3 - Supplemental Survey / Investigation / Utility Verification Utility Records Evaluation 1 2 2 4 9 $ 1,910.00 $ - $ 1,910.00 Utility Locating and CCTV 3 2 8 13 $ 2,590.00 $ 6,505.40 $ 6,500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 158.00 $ 15,163.40 $ 17,753.40 Topographic Survey and Right-of-Way 1 6 7 $ 1,350.00 $ 14,449.60 $ 158.00 $ 14,607.60 $ 15,957.60 Subtotal Hours 2 5 4 18
Subtotal Cost $ - $ - $ 540.00 $ 1,150.00 $ 920.00 $ 3,240.00 $ - Task 3A OPTIONAL- Subsurface Exploration
Subsurface Explorations (Geophysics) 2 8 1 11 $ 2,505.00 $ 7,150.00 $ 158.00 $ 7,308.00 $ 9,813.00 Geophysics Only $ 9,813.00 Subsurface Explorations (Exploratory boring) 2 10 2 14 $ 3,090.00 $ 883.30 $ 1,400.00 $ 9,350.00 $ 158.00 $ 11,791.30 $ 14,881.30 Boring and Lab only $ 17,011.30 Inclinometer option with 2 rounds of readings and reporting 10 2 12 $ 2,550.00 $ 1,219.90 $ 1,375.00 $ 2,594.90 $ 5,144.90 Boring with inclinometer and lab $ 22,156.20 Laboratory Testing 1 2 1 4 $ 930.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 2,130.00 Subtotal Hours (all options) 1 4 30 6
Subtotal Cost (most expensive option) $ - $ 345.00 $ 1,080.00 $ - $ 6,900.00 $ - $ 750.00 Task 4 - Agency / Utility / Property Coordination
Summary Matrix of Utility Conflicts, Project Constraints 2 6 8 $ 1,920.00 $ - $ 1,920.00 Summary List of Design Constraints for Later Phases 1 2 6 8 $ 2,315.00 $ 158.00 $ 158.00 $ 2,473.00 Subtotal Hours 1 4 12
Subtotal Cost $ 395.00 $ - $ 1,080.00 $ - $ 2,760.00 $ - $ - Task 5 - Alternatives Evaluation and Basis of Design
Draft Basis of Design Memorandum 2 4 4 6 10 4 3 31 $ 8,025.00 $ - $ 8,025.00 Alternatives Comparison Matrix 2 2 10 14 $ 3,530.00 $ - $ 3,530.00 Summary of Findings Meeting and Direction for 30% 2 2 2 6 $ 1,690.00 $ - $ 1,690.00 Subtotal Hours 2 8 8 6 22 4 3
Subtotal Cost $ 790.00 $ 2,760.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 1,380.00 $ 5,060.00 $ 720.00 $ 375.00 Task 6 - 30% Concept Design and Refined Cost
30% Plans 1 2 4 10 24 16 56 $ 12,865.00 $ - $ 12,865.00 30% Engineers Estimate 2 8 10 $ 2,380.00 $ - $ 2,380.00 Next Steps for CEQA, Permitting, Utility, Easements, & Design 1 1 4 2 4 12 $ 2,715.00 $ - $ 2,715.00 Final Basis of Design Memorandum 1 2 2 4 8 2 2 20 $ 4,995.00 $ - $ 4,995.00 Subtotal Hours 2 5 9 18 42 22 2
Subtotal Cost $ 790.00 $ 1,725.00 $ 2,430.00 $ 4,140.00 $ 9,660.00 $ 3,960.00 $ 250.00 Total Hours 5 23 40 30 150 56 20
Total Cost $ 1,975.00 $ 7,935.00 $ 10,800.00 $ 6,900.00 $ 34,500.00 $ 10,080.00 $ 2,500.00 Task 7 - CEQA Support
Draft CEQA Support Materials 1 1 2 4 6 14 $ 3,075.00 $ - $ 3,075.00 Final CEQA Support Materials 1 2 2 4 9 $ 1,910.00 $ - $ 1,910.00 Technical Exhibits and Descriptions 2 4 4 10 $ 2,180.00 $ - $ 2,180.00 Meeting as Requested 1 1 2 4 $ 1,075.00 $ - $ 1,075.00
Subtotal Hours 2 5 6 10 14
Subtotal Cost $ - $ 690.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 1,380.00 $ 2,300.00 $ 2,520.00 $ - Task 8 - 60%, 90%, 100% PS&E
60% Plans 2 6 8 30 18 64 $ 14,290.00 $ - $ 14,290.00
60% Specifications 1 2 2 8 2 15 $ 3,435.00 $ - $ 3,435.00 60% Engineers Estimate 1 1 4 8 14 $ 3,375.00 $ - $ 3,375.00 90% Calculations 1 6 6 10 23 $ 5,645.00 $ - $ 5,645.00
90% Plans 2 6 8 26 16 58 $ 13,010.00 $ - $ 13,010.00
90% Specifications 1 1 2 8 2 14 $ 3,165.00 $ - $ 3,165.00 90% Engineers Estimate 1 1 2 6 10 $ 2,455.00 $ - $ 2,455.00 100% Plans 1 2 6 18 10 37 $ 8,205.00 $ - $ 8,205.00
100% Specifications 1 1 2 6 1 11 $ 2,580.00 $ - $ 2,580.00 100% Engineers Estimate 1 1 2 6 10 $ 2,455.00 $ - $ 2,455.00 Subtotal Hours 12 27 42 126 44 5
Subtotal Cost $ - $ 4,140.00 $ 7,290.00 $ 9,660.00 $ 28,980.00 $ 7,920.00 $ 625.00 Task 9 - Bidding Support
Bidder RFI and Addendum 1 2 6 6 15 $ 3,645.00 $ - $ 3,645.00 Attend Pre-bid Meeting 1 1 2 $ 615.00 $ - $ 615.00
Conformed PS&E 1 2 10 4 17 $ 3,905.00 $ - $ 3,905.00
Subtotal Hours 3 5 6 16 4
Subtotal Cost $ - $ 1,035.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 1,380.00 $ 3,680.00 $ 720.00 $ - Task 10 - Construction Support
Preconstruction Meeting 1 1 2 4 $ 1,075.00 $ - $ 1,075.00 Review and Respond to Submittals 1 2 12 4 19 $ 4,365.00 $ - $ 4,365.00 Review and Respond to RFI's 1 2 12 4 19 $ 4,365.00 $ - $ 4,365.00 Limited Site Visits 2 2 12 24 40 $ 8,310.00 $ - $ 8,310.00 Final Walkthrough and Punchlist 2 2 2 6 $ 1,690.00 $ - $ 1,690.00 Assist with Technical Review and Claims 1 2 4 4 10 $ 3,085.00 $ - $ 3,085.00 Subtotal Hours 1 9 13 44 32
Subtotal Cost $ 395.00 $ 3,105.00 $ 3,510.00 $ - $ 10,120.00 $ 5,760.00 $ - Total Hours 6 49 90 84 346 150 25
Total Cost $ 2,370.00 $ 16,905.00 $ 24,300.00 $ 19,320.00 $ 79,580.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 3,125.00 $ 35,621.00
$ 13,245.00
$ 22,955.00
$ 4,393.00
$ 316.00 $ 15,586.20 $ 22,156.20
$ 45,831.20
$ - $ 9,640.00
$ 316.00 $ 10,006.00
34 $ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,000.00
$ - $ -
$ 8,165.00
744 $ 170,095.00 $ 20,955.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 1,106.00 $ 45,831.20 98 $ 22,890.00 $ - $ - $ - $ -
51 $ 2,103.20
$ -

DESCRIPTION
41 $ 9,640.00 $ -
43 $ 9,690.00 $ -
41 $ 6,570.00 $ -

STAFFING
$ -
$ -
$ 2,000.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 2,000.00
$ - $ -
$ -
$ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ 6,500.00
$ 158.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 8,165.00 $ - $ - $ - $ -
$ -
$ - Total Cost
$ -
$ 316.00

REIMBURSABLES (NO MARKUP)
$ 29,771.00
$ - $ -
$ 4,235.00 $ - $ - $ 158.00
$ 5,850.00 $ 20,955.00 $ 316.00
$ -
$ -
$ 2,103.20
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
256 $ 58,615.00 $ - $ - $ -
16 29 $ -
$ -
$ 13,245.00
98 $ 22,955.00
37 $ 8,240.00 $ - $ -
278 $ 65,615.00 $ 20,955.00 $ 6,500.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,200.00
$ -
$ -
$ 17,875.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 17,875.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 17,875.00
$ 1,200.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,200.00
$ -
$ 2,103.20 $ 1,400.00
$ 1,400.00
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ -
$ 1,400.00
$ - $ 58,615.00
$ 1,106.00
$ 8,240.00
$ 215,926.20
$ 22,890.00
$ 118,016.20
12/10/2025
Attachemd C
100
Attachment C
-22-
Att C - PSA Rheem_Blvd_Slide_Repair_Award_

EXHIBIT D
Other Consultants, Specialists or Experts Employed by Consultant If none specify “None”
[To be Inserted]
101
-23-
att c - psa rheem_blvd_slide_repair_award_

EXHIBIT E
Town of Moraga
Insurance and Liability Requirements
[attach]
Attachment C
102
Rheem Blvd, at Chalda Wy Slide Repair
Category
Project Rheem Blvd, Canyon Rd, and Moraga
Rd
Transportation
Project No: 25-408
Public Works
Location:

Responsible
Department:
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2029-30

PROJECT
TOTAL

EXPENDITURES
(Thousands of Dollars)
2028-29
FY 24/25
Carryover
Prior FY
Actuals
FY2024 -
FY2025
Expenses
071 - Administration 5 10 15
072 - Construction 565 565
073 - Const Mgmt/Inspection 12 12
074 - Contingency 57 57
075 - Design 120 118 238
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 125 762 887
FUNDING SOURCES
213-Measure K 125 762 887
FUNDING TOTALS 125 762 887
Account Number & Status:   700-724-XXX-25 - Funded
Project Objective:   Address failures that are posing a risk to public safety and infrastructure. This project addresses FY 25-26 and FY 26-27 Town Goal #3 and Priority #3.

Project Description:   Investigate pavement cracking and vertical separation along Rheem Blvd. in the No. 2 Eastbound Lane west of Chalda Way, Moraga Road north of Corte Santa Clara, Rheem Boulevard west of Scofield, and Canyon Road south of the bridge. The engineering study will identify the underlying causes of failures posing a risk to public safety and determine appropriate mitigation measures and costs.

Basis for Schedule:   Rheem Boulevard west of Chalda Way has developed severe separation in the Eastbound No. 2 lane, possibly due to deep earth movement in the underlying embankment.  This is currently an ongoing traffic safety issue and could lead to a catastrophic loss of Rheem Blvd in the future.

Basis for Cost:   Cost is based on past projects in the Town and adjacent agencies, Caltrans equipment rate, and contract cost data.

Project Balance Note:

Attachment D
103
DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 9A
To: Honorable Mayor & Town Councilmembers
From: Katie Bruner, Administrative Services Director
Subject: Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Update
Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution:

1. Amending the Fiscal Year 2026-27 operating budget by increasing General Fund Revenues and Appropriations by $201,585; and

2. Amending the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Budget to add the Commons Park All Access Playground Shade Structure (CIP 26-304), with a total project budget of $218,000.

BACKGROUND
The Town Council adopted the Biennial Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26 and 2026-27 Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets on June 25, 2025, per Resolution 40-2025. As the second fiscal year of the budget cycle begins on July 1, 2026, staff have reviewed the adopted FY 2026-27 Operating and Capital Budget and have recommended adjustments.

DISCUSSION
The FY 2025-26 Budget was developed in the spring of 2025 and adopted on June 25, 2025.

The adopted FY 2026-27 Operating Budget projected General Fund operating revenues equaling expenditures and an estimated unassigned fund balance of approximately $6.9 million as of June 30, 2027, which equates to a 50% General Fund Reserve, which meets the Town’s General Fund Reserve Policy.

Staff have reviewed projections for the FY 2026-27 Operating Budget, identified key changes between budget adoption and the beginning of FY 2026-27, and have identified recommended budget adjustments for the upcoming fiscal year.

FUND 101 – GENERAL FUND
104
The FY 2026-27 General Fund Operating Budget was adopted with projected revenues and transfers in of $13,763,461 and appropriations of $13,763,461. As of June 30, 2025, the Town’s General Fund Reserve had a balance of $6,824,996, which is equal to 50% of the adopted FY 2026-27 General Fund operating expenditures.

Staff recommends increasing revenue and appropriations by $201,585 as detailed below. The recommended budget adjustments will result in General Fund revenues of $13,965,046 equaling expenditures and transfers out of $13,905,046.

The FY 2026-27 General Fund Budget Summary report is included as Attachment B. This report details the FY 2025-26 Revised Budget, the FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget and recommended adjustments to the FY 2026-27 Budget.

General Fund Revenue Adjustments
General Fund revenues are recommended to increase by $201,585. Recommended adjustments to General Fund Revenues are detailed below and in Attachment A. • Parks & Recreation – Increase revenues by $143,000.

The Parks & Recreation Department projects increased revenue from recreation programming, including senior programs and activities and adding an additional After School Enrichment Program location.
• Public Works – Increase revenues by $58,585.

Public Works recommends increasing encroachment permit revenues, based on current year activity.

General Fund Appropriation Adjustments
General Fund appropriations are recommended to be increased by $201,585. Recommended adjustments to General Fund appropriations are detailed below and in Attachment A.

Administrative Services Department
• General Liability Insurance Premiums – Decreased appropriations of $88,644 Staff projected insurance premiums for the Town’s General Liability to remain flat in FY 2025- 26 and included a 10% increase in rates in 2026-27 budget, based on premium increases in the prior budget cycle. The Town’s General Liability premiums actually decreased last fiscal year by 10%. While General Liability rates increased slightly this year, they are still lower than budgeted by $88,644.

In future budget cycles, staff will conservatively estimate rates based on the information provided by Municipal Pooling Authority, but the current rates will serve as a lower base for future rate increases.

Staff is recommending using a portion of the savings from insurance premiums for staffing adjustments in ASD and the Police Department, as described further in this report. 105
• Increase Accounting Technician from 0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE – Increase appropriations of $52,235
Staff recommends increasing the FTE of the Accounting Technician from .6 FTE to 1 FTE to provide additional support and backup in the Finance Department. As ASD Department recently implemented a new financial system, which will allow the Town and Department to continue to modernize its business processes. Increasing the FTE of the Accounting Technician will allow for additional payroll support, updating of processes and procedures, and improving Departmental succession planning efforts. The increased cost of approximately $50,000 will be offset by reduced insurance premiums.

Parks & Recreation Department
• After School Enrichment Program Contract Services - Increase Department appropriations by $66,000.

The Parks & Recreation Department is recommending increased appropriations of $66,000 for contract services related to the additional After School Enrichment Program site that will be added in FY 2026-27. This increase in cost will be offset by additional Department revenue. • Temporary Staff for After School Enrichment Program - Increase Department appropriations by $40,000.

The Parks & Recreation Department is recommending increased appropriations of $40,000 for hourly staff related to the additional After School Enrichment Program site that will be added in FY 2026-27. This increase in cost will be offset by additional Department revenue. • Increase Administrative Assistant to 0.70 FTE - Increase Department appropriations by $19,808.

The 0.45 FTE Administrative Assistant for the Parks & Recreation Department is also recommended to be increased to 0.7 FTE. The Administrative Assistant provides front counter customer service at the Parks & Recreation Department and supports program registration, senior programs, and Department special events. The additional cost of the increased hours for the Administrative Assistant is approximately $20,000 and will be offset by increased Department revenue.
• Supplies and Materials - Increase Department appropriations by $17,192.

The Parks & Recreation Department is recommending increased appropriations of $17,000 for supplies and materials for senior programming and the additional After School Enrichment Program site that will be added in FY 2026-27. This increase in cost will be offset by additional Department revenue.

Police Department
• Reclassification of 2 Police Corporals to Police Sergeants - Increase Police Department appropriations by $36,019.

The Police Department currently has 6 Police Officers and 4 Corporal positions. Staff is 106
recommending the reclassification of 2 Corporals to Police Sergeants. The Police Sergeant is the classification between the Police Lieutenant and Police Corporal, and incumbents provide additional supervisory and administrative duties. The reclassification of these positions will bring the Department’s structure in line with other Police Departments, improve Department succession planning efforts, and provide a promotional opportunity for existing staff, which in turn will support staff retention. The increased cost of approximately $36,000 will be offset by reduced insurance premiums.

Public Works Department
• Public Works Departmental Appropriations - Increase Department appropriations by $58,585.

The Public Works Department recommend increasing maintenance contractual budgets by $58,585 in FY 2026-27 for street maintenance, building maintenance and storm drain maintenance. The increased appropriations will be offset by increased revenue.

Authorized Position Summary
The Town had 41.5 Full Time Equivalent (FTE) positions authorized when the FY 2026-27 budget was adopted on June 25, 2025. As described above, and shown in Attachment C, staff recommends the reclassification of 2 positions, and increasing staff hours for two positions. The overall net change in the Town’s FTE is recommended to increase by .65 FTE, for a total of 42.15 FTE.

OTHER FUNDS (NON-GENERAL FUNDS)
CIP 26-304 - Commons Park All Access Playground Shade Structure Staff recommends a new CIP project for the installation of a shade structure at the Commons Park All Access Playground. The Parks & Recreation Department has been working with the Community Foundation to identify the project and estimated costs. As shown in the CIP project worksheet (Attachment D), the estimated project cost is $218,000. $200,000 will be funded through donations from the Community Foundation, with $18,000 funded by the Asset Replacement Fund. Staff is in discussion with community organizations in an attempt to have the project fully funded by donations, if possible.

FISCAL IMPACT
General Fund
With the recommended revenue and appropriation adjustments, the FY 2026-27 Budget is projecting revenues equaling appropriations. Revised revenue is projected to be $13,965,046, and recommended appropriations are $13,965,046.

The Town’s General Fund Reserve has a current balance of $6,824,996, which is equal to 50% of the adopted FY 2026-27 General Fund operating expenditures. Additional contributions to reserves will be made as the current fiscal year (FY 2025-26) closes to ensure the 50% reserve balance is met.
107
Other Funds
The proposed shade structure at the Commons Playground will be primarily funded through donations. Staff recommends $18,000 of Asset Replacement Funds be used to make up the difference between donations and the full project cost. While staff are continuing to work with community organizations to ensure this project is fully funded by donations, the Asset Replacement Fund has sufficient fund balance to support this project. This project will have no impact on the Town’s General fund.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
Adjustments to the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget are not subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq., "CEQA") and CEQA Guidelines (Title 14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et seq.), because it constitutes an organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt the resolution with modifications.

2. Do not adopt the resolution and provide alternative direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
Upon adoption of the resolution, staff will incorporate the FY 2026-27 budget adjustments into the Town's financial system and take necessary steps to implement personnel changes.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - DRAFT Resolution - FY27 Budget Adjustments Attachment B - General Fund Budget Summary
Attachment C - FY27 Update Authorized FTE Summary
Attachment D - CIP 26-304 - All Access Playground Shade Structure 108
Attachment A
Resolution No. XX-2026 1 July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2026
APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 OPERATING and

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET
WHEREAS, the Town Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2025-26 and Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating and Capital Improvement Budgets on June 25,2025 per Resolutions 37-2025, 38-2025,039-2025, and 40-2025;
WHEREAS, the budget provides a working financial plan for the year based on estimated revenues and expenditures;
WHEREAS, staff conducts a periodic review of the status of revenues and appropriations as adopted in the Biennial Budget to verify that allocations remain accurate and reflective of the Town’s current financial experience; WHEREAS, as part of the budget review process, proposed budget amendments are presented for Town Council consideration;
WHEREAS, the FY 2026-27 budget amendments are outlined in Exhibit A attached to this resolution; and
WHEREAS, the FY 2026-27 Budget, as amended, is balanced, meaning that the annual appropriations are supported by the projected annual revenue sources, in accordance with Resolution 83-2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Moraga that it hereby approves the amendments to the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating and Capital Improvement Budget as shown in Exhibit A and made a part of this resolution.

Except as amended herein, Resolution 40-2025 remains in full force and effect. 109
Attachment A
Resolution No. XX-2026 2 July 8, 2026
Exhibit A
Revenues
Department Amount Description
$ 108,000 After School Enrichment Program
$ 35,000 Senior Programming Revenue
Total Parks & Recreation $ 143,000
Public Works $ 58,585 Encroachment Permit Revenue
Total Public Works $ 58,585
Total Revenue Adjustments $ 201,585
Appropriations
Department Amount Description
$ (88,664) Decrease in General Liability Insurance Premiums $ 52,645 Increase to 1.0 FTE Accounting Technician
Total Administrative Services $ (36,019)
$ 66,000 After School Enrichment Contract Services
$ 40,000 Temporary Staff for After School Enrichment Program $ 19,808 Increase to 0.70 FTE Administrative Assistant
$ 17,192 Supplies and Materials
Total Parks & Recreation $ 143,000
Police Department $ 36,019 Reclassification of 2 Police Corporals to Police Sergeants Total Police $ 36,019
Public Works $ 58,585 Building, Storm Drain, & Road Maintenance Contractual Services Total Public Works $ 58,585
Total Appropriation Adjustments $ 201,585
Project Amount Description
$ 218,000 Total Project Expenditures
Funding Sources
$ 200,000 Donations
$ 18,000 Asset Replacement Fund
$ 218,000 Total Funding Sources
FY 2026-27 Proposed General Fund Budget Adjustments
Parks & Recreation
Administrative Services
Parks & Recreation
FY 2026-27 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget Adjustments CIP 26-304 - Commons Park All
Access Playground Shade
Structure
110
Attachment B
FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27 FY 2026-27 FY 2026-27
General Fund Budget Revised Budget Adopted Budget
Proposed
Adjustments
Recommended
Revised Budget
Revenues
General Revenues
Property Taxes $ 6,001,903 $ 6,241,453 -$ 6,241,453 $
Sales Tax 1,400,000 1,450,000 - 1,450,000
Franchise Fees 1,141,495 1,196,560 - 1,196,560
Interest 450,000 450,000 - 450,000
Other Revenues 251,010 254,011 - 254,011
General Revenues Total $ 9,244,408 $ 9,592,024 -$ 9,592,024 $ Department Revenues
General Government $ 538,429 $ 400,992 -$ 400,992 $
Parks & Recreation 1,233,490 1,258,952 143,000 1,401,952 Planning 648,927 673,391 - 673,391
Police 76,440 77,743 - 77,743
Public Works 705,963 740,415 58,585 799,000
Total Department Revenues $ 3,203,249 $ 3,151,493 201,585$ $ 3,353,078 Transfers In 839,331 1,019,944 $ 1,019,944
Total Revenues & Transfers In $ 13,286,988 $ 13,763,461 201,585$ $ 13,965,046 Expenditures
Administrative Services $ 1,893,306 $ 1,738,979 $ (36,019) $ 1,702,960 General Government 2,280,921 2,332,662 - 2,332,662
Parks & Recreation 2,063,798 2,157,780 143,000 2,300,780 Planning 981,481 989,089 - 989,089
Police 3,854,084 3,997,896 36,019 4,033,915
Public Works 2,332,798 2,433,586 58,585 2,492,171
Total Operating Expenditures $ 13,406,388 $ 13,649,992 201,585$ $ 13,851,577 Transfers Out 825,379 113,469 - 113,469 $
Total Expenditures & Transfers Out 14,231,767 $ $ 13,763,461 201,585$ $ 13,965,046 Revenue less Expenditures $ (944,779) $ - -$ $ 0
111
Attachment C
Department Position
Authorized
FY 2025-26
Adopted
FY 2026-27
Proposed
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Change
Administrative Services Accounting Technician 0.60 0.60 1.00 0.40 Administrative Services Technician 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Administrative Services Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Senior Accountant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

3.60 3.60 4.00 0.40
General Government Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Town Clerk 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Town Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00

3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00
Parks & Rec Administrative Assistant 0.45 0.45 0.70 0.25 Maintenance Worker 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Parks and Rec Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PW/Parks Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Recreation Coordinator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Recreation Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Recreation Manager 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Parks & Rec Subtotal 6.45 6.45 6.70 0.25
Planning Assistant Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Associate Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Planner Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Principal Planner 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Senior Administrative Assistant 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.00
Planning Subtotal 4.70 4.70 4.70 0.00
Police Police Chief 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Police Corporal 4.00 4.00 2.00 -2.00
Police Lieutenant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Police Officer 6.00 6.00 6.00 0.00
Police Sergeant 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00
Police Services Technician 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.00
Support Services Coordinator 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Police Subtotal 13.75 13.75 13.75 0.00
Public Works Assistant Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Associate Engineer 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Engineering Technician/Inspector 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Lead Maintenance Worker 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Public Works Director 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PW/Parks Maintenance Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Senior Administrative Assistant 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Senior Engineer 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00
Public Works Subtotal 10.00 10.00 10.00 0.00
Grand Total 41.50 41.50 42.15 0.65
Administrative Services Subtotal
General Government Subtotal
Fiscal Year 2026-27 Authorized Position Summary
112
Commons Park All Access Playground Shade Structure
Category
Project Commons Park
Parks & Open Space
Project No: 26-304
Public Works,Parks & Recreation
Location:

Responsible
Department:
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2030-31

PROJECT
TOTAL

EXPENDITURES
(Thousands of Dollars)
2029-30
071 - Administration 20 20
072 - Construction 180 180
074 - Contingency 18 18
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 218 218
FUNDING SOURCES
-Donations 200 200
150-Asset Replacement 18 18
FUNDING TOTALS 218 218
DESCRIPTION:   Install a permanent shade structure at the Moraga Commons Park All Access Playground to provide sun protection for children, caregivers, and visitors utilizing the inclusive playground. The project includes design, permitting, procurement, and installation of a shade structure over portions of the playground area, along with any necessary site improvements and foundations.

JUSTIFICATION:   The Moraga Commons Park All Access Playground is a heavily used community asset designed to provide inclusive play opportunities for children of all abilities. The playground currently lacks adequate shade, resulting in elevated surface temperatures and reduced comfort during warm weather.

Community members, the Parks & Recreation Commission, and partner organizations have identified shade as a priority enhancement to improve accessibility, safety, and user experience. Adding shade will:
-Reduce heat exposure and UV radiation for children and caregivers. -Improve comfort and accessibility for users of all ages and abilities. -Extend the usable hours of the playground during warmer months. -Protect playground users from excessive sun exposure.
-Enhance the long-term value and functionality of the Town's investment in the All Access Playground.

FISCAL IMPACT:   Project costs include design, permitting, construction, and a contingency allowance. The project is anticipated to be funded entirely through private donations and fundraising efforts, with no impact to the Town's General Fund.

Attachment D
113
DEPARTMENT REPORTS: 9B
To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
From: Nate Levine, Public Works Director/Town Engineer Mackenzie Brady, Parks and Recreation Director
Subject: La Sala Building Update
Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Receive the report and direct staff to p roceed with demolition planning for the La Sala building located at the Hacienda de las Flores property.

BACKGROUND
La Sala is a Town-owned building located at the Hacienda de las Flores property, at 2100 Donald Drive, that has historically been used for recreation programs, meetings, storage, and other Town operations.

Over time, La Sala has become a building without a clear long-term purpose, a funded repair plan, or an active capital investment strategy. The building has been discussed in prior Hacienda planning and asset-management efforts, but the Town Council has not made a specific decision regarding its future use, repair, replacement, or removal. In 2016, the Town Council accepted the final Gould Evans conceptual feasibility study for the Hacienda property.

The holistic concept showed La Sala being removed in a later phase with the area being converted into an expanded drop-off courtyard and patio area. In that sense, the long-term concept did not identify La Sala as a permanent building to retain. However, the concept was not advanced into an implemented capital project, and the building was not removed.

In 2019, the Town accepted the MRG Capital Asset Replacement Report. That report listed the “1977 La Sala Building” as “Will not be replaced” and did not include capital replacement or repair funding for the building. At the same meeting, staff comments reflected a recommendation against making additional significant investments in La Sala given the building’s condition. However, the Council action accepted the asset report and continued broader discussions regarding funding needs; it did not include a separate action deciding La Sala’s future.
114
Since that time, no funded repair, reuse, or replacement plan has been advanced for La Sala.

The recent water damage and environmental issues have now required staff to evaluate next steps for the building and return to the Town Council with recommendations.

DISCUSSION
Staff is requesting direction and authorization to prepare the technical documents necessary to accurately determine project costs, complete environmental review, prepare bid documents, and return to the Town Council with a competitive bid, CEQA determination, funding recommendation, and final demolition authorization. This phased approach allows the Town Council to make a fully informed decision based on actual bid pricing and completed environmental review before committing to the project.

Current Building Status
La Sala is currently closed due to recently discovered water damage and related environmental conditions identified during a preliminary assessment of the building by Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc in April 2026. The assessment included visual observations, moisture measurements, air sampling, and surface sampling. The report recommended remediation of affected materials. The assessment report is included as Attachment A.

Staff closed the building because remediation and repair work should be completed before the building is reopened, the work is unfunded, and staff needed to evaluate whether it’s recommended and feasible to reinvest in the building before proceeding with repairs.

Returning La Sala to reliable use would require removing affected materials, completing remediation, repairing and restoring the removed materials, addressing roof and leak-related conditions to prevent recurrence, and completing any additional work identified once materials are opened up. It would also not address longer-term structural and site concerns unless the Town invested in a larger repair and stabilization project. This would be a significant investment in a building that does not currently have an adopted long-term use, funded reinvestment strategy, or identified capital improvement plan.

Doing nothing is not cost-free. Even if La Sala remains closed, the Town will still need to monitor and maintain the building, address ongoing deterioration, and respond to potential nuisance or abatement issues that can occur when a building remains vacant, including pest intrusion and weather-related damage. Delaying a decision would therefore continue to create maintenance and response costs before the Town ultimately spends additional funds on repair, stabilization, or demolition.

Attachment C provides a location map, and Attachment D includes existing conditions with photos.

Repair, Stabilization, and Demolition Options
Staff reviewed the practical options available to the Town at a planning level. These options are intended to provide general cost context and are not final project cost estimates.

Preliminary cost information is included as Attachment B. Final demolition costs would be determined through competitive bidding.
115
Limited repair/reopening approach — approximately $50,000 to $100,000. This approach would address only the most immediate water damage and remediation needs, so the building could potentially be reopened. It would not address the broader building issues and would likely leave the Town with ongoing needs for the roof, foundation, site, and building systems. Staff does not recommend this approach because it requires spending money to reopen a building that still lacks a long-term purpose and a repair plan.

Basic repair and stabilization approach — approximately $350,000 to $400,000.

This approach would include remediation, roof repair or replacement, basic foundation stabilization, and related work. It would not necessarily level or fully restore the building, and it would still leave the Town with an older building with limited current operational need.

Enhanced repair and stabilization approach — approximately $750,000 to $800,000. This approach would include more substantial foundation work, roof work, remediation, repair of secondary building damage, utility-related repairs, and related improvements. This approach would still not include broader renovation, modernization, or new programmatic improvements.

Full repair/improvement approach — likely $1,000,000 or more. A broader repair and improvement effort would only be practical if the Town had a clear long-term use for La Sala and was prepared to make the building a higher capital priority. This approach would also need to consider the creek-bank condition adjacent to the building.

Preliminary cost information notes that the creek bank will continue to slide. If the Town were to make a major reinvestment in La Sala, this site condition would need to be considered and could significantly increase the overall cost and complexity of the project.

Staff does not recommend this approach given the Town’s other facility, infrastructure, and capital needs.

Demolition planning — preliminary engineer’s estimate of approximately $150,000 – $250,000; Demolition would remove the building, avoid spending additional funds to remediate and then restore the existing structure, and allow the Town to consider a more useful outdoor area at the Hacienda property. Because demolition work may include hazardous materials handling, environmental handling requirements, utility disconnection and capping, site stabilization, contingency, and unknown field conditions, staff anticipates that the overall project budget need may be closer to $200,000.

Based on the building's condition, the absence of an adopted long-term capital strategy, and the significant cost associated with reinvestment, staff recommends proceeding with demolition planning.

Demolition Scope and Future Site Use
If directed by the Town Council, staff will prepare plans, specifications, and bid documents for demolition of La Sala. The anticipated scope will include, at minimum:

Hazardous materials testing, including asbestos and lead surveys before disturbance of building materials;
Environmental handling requirements as needed for demolition; 116
Utility disconnection, capping, and/or removal;
Demolition and disposal of the building;
Protection of adjacent Hacienda facilities and site improvements; Site grading, stabilization, and the minimum site restoration necessary to leave the area in a safe, functional, and visually appropriate condition for continued Hacienda operations;
Evaluation of opportunities for salvage, reuse, or recycling of building materials where feasible; and
Coordination regarding future use of the cleared area.

The demolition bid documents will also evaluate opportunities for salvage, reuse, or recycling of building materials where feasible, provided that doing so does not create unreasonable cost, schedule, safety, environmental, or contract administration issues for the Town.

Because La Sala is immediately adjacent to event facilities operated by Wedgewood Weddings, demolition will need to include an appropriate level of site restoration to ensure the area remains safe, functional, and visually compatible with ongoing event operations. The Town has an obligation to avoid unnecessary impacts to Hacienda operations, including events conducted by Wedgewood Weddings under the Town's operating agreement, and the associated revenue generated by the facility. Accordingly, the demolition project will include a minimum level of post-demolition grading, stabilization, landscaping, or other appropriate site restoration necessary to leave the area in a condition suitable for continued Hacienda operations and events. Any future enhancements beyond this baseline restoration would be considered separately, subject to available funding and future Town Council direction.

Existing Use, Operational Impact, and Master Plan
La Sala has historically supported Parks and Recreation, community, and Hacienda-related uses, including recreation programming, meetings, storage, and other Town operations.

Since the building was closed, Parks and Recreation staff has relocated most of the affected programming to other Town-owned facilities and outdoor spaces. These adjustments have allowed the Town to preserve most programs, but they have also reduced operational flexibility and required temporary accommodations, including use of other Hacienda rooms, outdoor program space, and renting of temporary restrooms for summer and additional storage. The primary program loss is the Town’s cooking and culinary programming, which generated approximately $28,000 in annual revenue and cannot currently be relocated because La Sala contains the Town’s only kitchen used for public recreation programming.

While the closure has had operational and programming impacts, staff does not believe those impacts justify reinvesting in La Sala. The cost to remediate, repair, stabilize, and restore the building would substantially exceed the revenue associated with the programs that cannot continue, and the building does not provide a practical long-term solution for the Town’s future programming needs. Staff believes those operational needs are more appropriately addressed through future facility planning rather than through continued investment in a building that lacks an adopted long-term capital strategy.

Staff has also coordinated with the Town’s Parks, Recreation, and Open Space (PROS) Master Plan consultant team regarding demolition planning. The consultant team has indicated that removal of La Sala would not prejudice future master plan recommendations, 117
because the site’s future use can continue to be evaluated through the PROS Master Plan process.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no funding requested for this item at this time.

Staff’s preliminary engineer’s estimate for demolition bid items is approximately $150,000. The final construction cost will be determined through competitive bidding. Because demolition work may include hazardous materials handling, environmental handling requirements, utility disconnection and capping, site stabilization, contingency, and unknown field conditions, and the minimum level of grading, stabilization, and restoration necessary to complete the demolition project and leave the area in an appropriate finished condition, staff anticipates that the overall project budget need may be closer to $200,000. Potential funding sources for the demolition and associated costs include the Palos Colorados Fund and/or the Asset Replacement Fund.

Parks and Recreation Department operational costs associated with the building closure have been absorbed within the Department’s existing budget. Staff will return to the Town Council with the final bid results and funding recommendation before any demolition contract is awarded.

Any limited staff or consultant costs needed to prepare the bid package will be addressed through existing available resources. If additional pre-award funding is needed, staff will return to the Town Council for direction.

CEQA COMPLIANCE
This item only directs staff to prepare demolition plans, specifications, and bid documents. No demolition work is being approved at this time, and no construction or demolition contract will be awarded with this action.

Planning staff has reviewed the historical-resource question for La Sala for purposes of this direction item. Staff will complete the appropriate CEQA review and return to the Town Council with the CEQA determination when the demolition contract is presented for award.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Direct staff to further evaluate repair or reuse options before proceeding with demolition planning.

2. Direct staff to return with additional analysis before proceeding with demolition planning.

3. Do not direct staff to proceed with demolition planning and provide other direction to staff.

NEXT STEPS
If the Town Council directs staff to begin demolition planning for the La Sala building, staff will:

Prepare demolition plans, specifications, and bid documents; Include hazardous materials testing, utility disconnection/capping/removal, demolition, 118
site stabilization, and environmental handling requirements in the demolition scope; Evaluate opportunities for salvage, reuse, or recycling of building materials where feasible;
Coordinate with Wedgewood Weddings regarding potential post-demolition site considerations; and
Return to the Town Council for final CEQA determination, contract award, and funding recommendation after bids are received.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - La Sala Environmental Assessment Report
Attachment B - La Sala Cost Summary
Attachment C - Site Map
Attachment D - La Sala Existing Conditions Photos
9B - Addendum - Public Communication Received Prior to Meeting 119

LIMITED PRELIMINARY MOLD ASSESSMENT REPORT
SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED AT:

LA SALA
2100 DONALD DRIVE,
MORAGA, CALIFORNIA 94556
PREPARED FOR:

TOWN OF MORAGA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
ATTN: KYLE SALVIN
2100 DONALD DRIVE,
MORAGA, CALIFORNIA 94556
PREPARED BY:

PROJECT NO. 139176 – LM
ASSESSMENT DATE: APRIL 15 2026
REPORT DATE: APRIL 17, 2026
Attachment A
120
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 2 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026

1.0 INTRODUCTION
On April 15th, 2026, Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (TES) conducted a preliminary mold assessment at the property located at 2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, California 94556 (hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”). The assessment was authorized by Town of Moraga Public Works Department, Representative, Kyle Salvin (hereinafter referred to as the “Client”).

The following summarizes the assessment activities and findings, (herein referred to as the project area):
• As agreed upon with the Client, the assessment was limited to Main Room, Kitchen, Men’s Restroom and Women’s Restroom of the Subject Property. • The assessment consisted of visual observations, moisture content measurements, non-viable mold air sampling and non-viable surface swab sampling as requested by the Client.
• Based on this assessment, please see Section 5.0 for our recommendations.

2.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The preliminary mold assessment was performed by TES Staff Hygienist, Gabriel Klein.

The report was reviewed and approved by Ibrahim M. Sobeih, TES Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) in the Comprehensive Practice by the Board for Global EHS Credentialing (BGC Certificate #5628CP).

Standards and Guidelines
TES adheres to State-of-the-Art Industry Standards of Practices, which are based on relevant government regulations and guidelines established by professional organizations. These standards include, but are not limited to, the following:
• American National Standards Institute and Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration Certification (ANSI/IICRC):
o S520 - Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Mold Remediation, 3 rd Edition, 2015.
o S500 - Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Water Damage Restoration, 4
th Edition, 2015.
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Mold Remediation in Schools and Commercial Buildings, September 2008.
• New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi in Indoor Environments, November 2008. • American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).

Bioaerosols Assessment and Control, 1999.
• American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA):
121
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 3 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
o Recognition, Evaluation, and Control of Indoor Mold, 2008. o Field Guide for the Determination of Biological Contaminants in Environmental Samples, 1996.
• American National Standards Institute and American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ANSI/ASHRAE):
o Standard 55-2017-Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy.
o Standard 62.1-2016-Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality.

SCOPE OF WORK
As agreed upon with the Client, the assessment consisted of the following scope of work:
• Conduct a visual inspection of the project area;
• Measure surface moisture content on select surfaces in the project area using either a Delmhorst® TechCheck or a Protimeter® Surveymaster BLD5360 dual function scan and pin-type moisture meter on building materials; • Collect a limited number of spore trap mold spore air samples and surface samples in the project area in accordance with AIHA sampling protocol; • Analyze the mold spore air samples and surface samples by an AIHA accredited laboratory under the Environmental Microbiology Laboratory Accreditation Program (EMLAP); and
• Provide a written report summarizing the assessment activities and findings.

3.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
• Visual Observations: During the assessment, TES made the following observations:
o Main Room:
o At the time of the assessment, visible water staining or damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling were observed at the southwest end of the ceiling within the Main Room.
o At the time of the assessment, visible water staining or damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling were observed at the lower portion of the north end of the east wall immediately below the window within the Main Room.
o At the time of the assessment, no suspect mold growth was observed at the within the Main Room.
o Kitchen:
o At the time of the assessment, visible water staining and damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling was observed on the lower cabinet side support walls at the north end of the Kitchen. 122
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 4 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
o At the time of the assessment, suspect mold growth was observed on the lower cabinet side support walls at the north end of the Kitchen.
o Men’s Restroom:
o At the time of the assessment no visible water staining, water damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling or suspect mold growth were observed within the assessed areas of the Men’s Restroom.
o Women’s Restroom:
o At the time of the assessment no visible water staining, water damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling or suspect mold growth were observed within the assessed areas of the Women’s Restroom.
• Surface Moisture Content Measurements:
o Moisture content levels of the assessed substrates within the Main Room, were identified within the red zone at the southwest end of the ceiling and the north end of the east wall immediately below the window. o Moisture content levels of the assessed substrates within the Kitchen, Men’s Restroom and Women’s Restroom were identified within the green zone.
• Protimeter Surveymaster, LCD displays colored LEDs into three color zones:
o In the green zone, moisture content levels in substrates are in a safe airdry condition; o In the yellow zone, moisture content levels in substrates are higher than normal but not critical; further investigation is recommended; and o In the red zone, moisture content levels in substrates are excessive and too high. If sustained, high moisture levels will lead to decay and mold growth.
• Temperature and Relative Humidity Measurements: ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2017 stipulated a thermal comfort zone of 67-82F for people doing light, primarily sedentary activity. Furthermore, the ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2016 recommended maintaining relative humidity within 65%. According to these standards, the indoor relative humidity readings were below the ASHRAE guidance level and temperature readings were within the ASHRAE guidance range in the project area.
123
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 5 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
• Spore Trap Mold Air Sample Analytical Results:
o The indoor mold air samples airborne spore levels of molds generally able to grow indoor, consisting of Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Other Brown and Penicillium/Aspergillus were found to be slightly elevated within the Main Room and Kitchen, as compared to the outdoor mold air sample. o The indoor mold air samples airborne spore levels of molds generally able to grow indoor, consisting of Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Other Brown and Penicillium/Aspergillus were found to be acceptable within the Men’s Restroom and Women’s Restroom as compared to the outdoor mold air sample.
o Molds not typically found colonizing indoor environments were detected as acceptable, including Ascospores, Basidiospores and Smuts / Periconia / Myxomycetes within the Main Room, Kitchen, Men’s Restroom and Women’s Restroom when compared to the outdoor air control sample. • Surface Swab Samples Analytical Results
o Sample No. 0415-07 – Kitchen – The swab sample collected from the suspect mold growth at the N. End Kitchen cabinetry wood panel under the sink revealed:
➢ 5 Chaetomium spores (Hyphae, fruiting bodies and clumps/chains of spores)
➢ Very few miscellaneous spores
➢ Mold growth detected

4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In summary, the preliminary mold damage assessment conducted by TES has provided the following key findings:

1. At the time of the assessment, visible water staining or damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling were observed at the southwest end of the ceiling within the Main Room.

2. At the time of the assessment, visible water staining or damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling were observed at the lower portion of the north end of the east wall immediately below the window within the Main Room.

3. At the time of the assessment, no suspect mold growth was observed at the within the Main Room.

4. At the time of the assessment, visible water staining and damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling was observed on the lower cabinet side support walls at the north end of the Kitchen.

5. At the time of the assessment, suspect mold growth was observed on the lower cabinet side support walls at the north end of the Kitchen. 124
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 6 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026

6. At the time of the assessment no visible water staining, water damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling or suspect mold growth were observed within the assessed areas of the Men’s Restroom.

7. At the time of the assessment no visible water staining, water damage such as buckling, bowing or bubbling or suspect mold growth were observed within the assessed areas of the Women’s Restroom.

8. Moisture content levels of the assessed substrates within the Main Room, were identified within the red zone at the southwest end of the ceiling and the north end of the east wall immediately below the window.

9. Moisture content levels of the assessed substrates within the Kitchen, Men’s Restroom and Women’s Restroom were identified within the green zone.

10. The indoor mold air samples airborne spore levels of molds generally able to grow indoor, consisting of Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Other Brown and Penicillium/Aspergillus were found to be slightly elevated within the Main Room and Kitchen, as compared to the outdoor mold air sample.

11. The indoor mold air samples airborne spore levels of molds generally able to grow indoor, consisting of Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Other Brown and Penicillium/Aspergillus were found to be acceptable within the Men’s Restroom and Women’s Restroom as compared to the outdoor mold air sample.

12. Molds not typically found colonizing indoor environments were detected as acceptable, including Ascospores, Basidiospores and Smuts / Periconia / Myxomycetes within the Main Room, Kitchen, Men’s Restroom and Women’s Restroom when compared to the outdoor air control sample.

13. Analytical results of the mold surface swab samples confirmed suspected mold growth on the tested surfaces of the Kitchen.

14. Based on the combined findings of the visual inspection, moisture content readings, and laboratory analytical results, mold remediation is recommended.

Recommendation
TES recommends conducting mold remediation of the affected substrates in the subject property in accordance with industry-recognized mold abatement practices and the specific remediation procedures outlined in Section 5.0 of this report. Prompt remediation will help prevent further moisture-related deterioration and limit the potential for additional microbial amplification.

5.0 MOLD AND WATER DAMAGE REMEDIATION PROTOCOL
Sources of Moisture Intrusion
Identify and correct all sources of water/moisture leaks or intrusions prior to mold remediation and structural demolition work.
125
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 7 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
Asbestos Hazards
In accordance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) regulations, an asbestos survey by a Cal/OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) shall be performed prior to disturbing/removing building materials. If asbestos is detected at any concentration the disturbance of the material must be conducted in accordance with Cal/OSHA regulations including, but not limited to, Title 8 Code of California Regulations (CCR) Section 1529. If asbestos is detected at concentrations exceeding one percent (>1%) then the material is also regulated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the local air pollution control district with jurisdiction over the county where the property is located. Abatement and removal of asbestos containing materials must be performed by a California licensed and Cal/OSHA registered asbestos abatement contractor.

Lead Hazards
In accordance with California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and Cal/OSHA regulations, lead sampling by a CDPH Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor shall be performed prior to disturbing/removing building materials. Construction materials with detectable lead concentrations below 5,000 ppm and/or 1.0 mg/cm2 are regulated by federal OSHA, Cal/OSHA, City of San Diego County (≥0.5 mg/cm2 and 1,000 ppm) and Los Angeles County. Furthermore, construction materials classified as lead-based paint (LBP) to include paint prior to 1978 and paints with lead concentrations equal to or greater than 5,000 ppm and/or 1.0 mg/cm2 are regulated by HUD, EPA, Cal/OSHA, CDPH and local government agencies in the State of California. Abatement and removal of lead paint and/or surfaces with lead paint must be performed by a California licensed hazardous materials abatement contractor.

Mold and Water Damage Remediation Specifications

1. Main Room
• Under local containment with High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtration, remove the wallboard ceiling materials at the southwest end in the main room, continuing removal to two feet beyond the extent of any visible water damage and/or suspect mold growth;
• Under localized containment with High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtration, Remove the affected wallboard wall materials along the lower portion of the north end of the east wall in the main room, immediately below the window, starting from the floor to two feet up the wall, continuing removal to two feet beyond the extent of any visible water damage and/or suspect mold growth; • If mold growth and/or suspect staining is observed in the wall and ceiling cavities, remove the affected wallboard wall or ceiling materials to two feet beyond the extent of visible mold growth and/or significant water damage; • Remove and properly dispose of any affected insulation and debris located within the exposed wall or ceiling cavity;
126
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 8 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
• The remedial contractor shall observe the backside of the removed wall and ceiling materials, and look inside the wall and ceiling cavity to carefully evaluate for visible water damage and/or suspect mold growth into adjacent areas; • If mold growth and/or suspect staining is observed within the exposed wall or ceiling cavities, remove the affected wallboard materials to a minimum of two (2) feet beyond the extent of visible mold growth and/or significant water damage. • Exposed lumber and other surfaces behind the removed wall and ceiling materials (e.g., structural framing members, etc.) shall be appropriately cleaned using a combination of sanding and/or wire brushing, followed by vacuuming with a vacuum equipped with HEPA filters;
• This cleaning process shall be repeated until visually clean surfaces are achieved;
• Using an EPA-registered antimicrobial cleaning agent, thoroughly wet wipe and HEPA vacuum all accessible horizontal and vertical finished surfaces within the room, including but not limited to walls, ceilings, floors, doors, windows, window casings, and other non-porous or semi-porous surfaces to remove settled mold spores and residual contamination.

2. Kitchen
• Under local containment with High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filtration, remove the lower cabinet along the north end of the Kitchen and thoroughly inspect the backside and the bottom wood framing of the cabinet for suspect mold growth and/or significant water damage. If the cabinet is restorable, wet wipe the cabinet with an anti-microbial cleaning detergent, and HEPA vacuum any debris until a visually clean surface is achieved and save for the reinstallation of the cabinets. If the cabinet is un-restorable, dispose of the cabinet with the owner’s approval. Inspect the wallboard wall materials behind the removed cabinet for the presence of mold growth and/or significant water damage. If mold growth and/or significant water damage is present it warrants the removal of the affected wallboard wall materials to two feet beyond the extent of visible mold growth and/or significant water damage;
• This cleaning process shall be repeated until visually clean surfaces are achieved;
• Using an EPA-registered antimicrobial cleaning agent, thoroughly wet wipe and HEPA vacuum all accessible horizontal and vertical finished surfaces within the room, including but not limited to walls, ceilings, floors, doors, windows, window casings, and other non-porous or semi-porous surfaces to remove settled mold spores and residual contamination.

Note: During the course of remediation, it is possible that additional mold contamination or water-damaged materials may be discovered behind concealed or inaccessible areas (e.g., behind wall and ceiling cavities, cabinetry, baseboards, or under flooring). If such 127
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 9 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
conditions are observed, the scope of remediation should be extended to address the newly identified impacts.

Worker Protection
• The contractor’s personnel shall wear respirators as part of the contractor’s respiratory protection program in accordance with Cal/OSHA’s Respiratory Protection Standard 8 CCR 5144.
• Half-face respirators with P-100 HEPA filters shall be worn in the contained work area at all times as a minimum respiratory protection.
• P-100 HEPA/Organic Vapor combination cartridges or P-100 HEPA/Organic Vapor/Acid Gas cartridges may be necessary depending on the types of agents used for the cleaning process.
• The contractor’s personnel shall wear disposable clothing, head covering, ear protection, foot covering and gloves during the remediation activities. • All workers shall be trained in handling and removing microbial waste. • All personnel shall understand and perform all remediation work in accordance with the guidelines established by EPA, OSHA and ANSI/IICRC S520. • All personnel should appropriately dispose of protective clothing, remove and clean respirators and eliminate any potential contamination upon each exit from the contained work area.

Engineering Controls and Isolation
• Complete isolation of the work area from the occupied spaces is required by sealing all critical barriers (e.g. openings, fixtures, windows, doorways, HVAC system openings, electrical outlets) of the contaminated area(s) with 1 layer of 6- mil Polyethylene plastic sheeting sealed with duct tape. • Replacement or make-up air shall be readily available. • Follow all applicable guidelines including, but not limited to OSHA, EPA and IICRC.
• Establish dehumidification within the containment as necessary until moisture is less than 15% in wood, 0.5% in drywall or other components depending on applicable conditions. Dehumidification should be performed by a qualified individual(s).
• It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure that the dehumidification equipment remains in place, working properly, and running continuously as needed for the duration of the cleaning process until TES establishes that the affected area is reasonably clear of mold from the related loss.

Waste Clean-Up and Disposal
• All waste generated during remediation activities shall be securely sealed in 6-mil polyethylene bags to prevent the release of particulates or potential mold spores. • Once filled, each waste bag shall be wet-wiped to remove any surface contamination and then placed into a second clean bag. These double-bagged 128
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 10 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
waste materials shall be stored in the designated bag-out room for proper disposal.
• All equipment and tools used within the work area shall undergo general cleaning procedures prior to exiting the containment zone. This step is necessary to prevent mold cross-contamination outside the work area.

Post Mold Remediation Assessment
• An Independent Environmental Professional, experienced in mold contamination and remediation, shall perform the post remediation verification assessment prior to any re-construction / repair work being performed.
• All cleaned surfaces must be exposed for verification and visual inspection. • Paints and/or encapsulants shall not be applied prior to clearance sampling, as they will hinder the ability of the investigator to perform a thorough investigation. • Prior to collecting any post remediation verification samples, the investigator shall perform a thorough visual inspection of the remediated areas. • If any portion of the remediated area is deemed suspect by the investigator based on the visual inspection, the investigator will bring these areas to the attention of the remediation contractor, and additional remediation efforts shall be implemented prior to collecting post remediation verification samples. • Post remediation verification sampling shall include surface moisture content testing, adequate surface and aggressive air sample collection to evaluate the effectiveness of the remediation efforts. Air samples should exhibit mold spores at concentrations less than outside air samples collected at approximately the same time as the post remediation evaluation samples.

6.0 LIMITATIONS AND APPROVALS
Reasonable effort has been made by TES personnel to detect and identify where substrates have been affected by moisture intrusion and consequent suspected mold growth. However, it is important to note that mold can flourish in areas where water leaks remain unaddressed. These areas encompass concealed spaces and adjacent construction materials, which house plumbing or drainage lines, as well as areas adjoining the building’s perimeter or enclosure system.

This assessment did not encompass areas that were not recognized as being impacted by water or moisture damage, or areas that were inaccessible. Hence, the potential for mold growth in these regions cannot be ruled out at this juncture.

The findings, conclusions, and recommendation of TES regarding moisture content levels within the examined substrates in the project areas pertain to the conditions as they existed during the investigation. These results are subject to the limitations and fluctuations inherent in the investigation methodology. 129
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 11 Limited Preliminary Mold Assessment Report
La Sala
2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556
Project No. 139176 - LM
April 17, 2026
It is important to clarify that TES cannot be held accountable for the effects of moisture related to weather conditions or construction activities that may have influenced moisture content levels in the tested substrates after the conclusion of the project.

This inspection exclusively covers areas accessible to the inspector as stipulated by the scope of work. Furthermore, the study’s scope is contingent upon the information provided by the Client at the time of the investigation. In the absence of federal or state standards during the investigation, we do not assume responsibility for subsequent technological or standard changes that may occur after this investigation date.

It is important to understand that his report is intended solely for the Client’s use, and TES does not bear responsibility for its utilization by any third party.

Regarding the health of past, present, or future occupants of the structure, TES recommends consulting a qualified medical professional for all inquiries.

Should you have any questions, please contact our office toll free at (888) 948-4826.

Sincerely,
TITAN ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, INC.
__________________________________________
Ibrahim M. Sobeih, MS, MSPH, CIH, CAC, FAIHA
Director of Industrial Hygiene and Safety
130
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite B, Fullerton, CA 92831*Office (888) 948-4826*Fax: (714) 871-8712 APPENDIX: LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT AND COC
131
132
133
134
Approved by:

Technical Manager
Murali Putty
Report for:

EPK Burlingame
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Ave, Ste B
Fullerton, CA 92831
Regarding:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
Project: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA EML ID: 4494803
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested. Information supplied by the client which can affect the validity of results: sample air volume.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results.

In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Spore trap analysis: 04-15-2026
Service SOPs: Spore trap analysis (EBET-DE-SOP89537(formerly EB-MY-S-1038)) AIHA LAP, LLC accredited service, Lab ID #102856
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC's LabServe® reporting system includes automated fail-safes to ensure that all AIHA LAP, LLC quality requirements are met and notifications are added to reports when any quality steps remain pending.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 1 of 5 135
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY
Location: 0415-01:

Baseline West exterior entrance
0415-02:

Kitchen center
Comments (see below) None None
Lab ID-Version‡: 22602154-1 22602155-1
Analysis Date: 04/15/2026 04/15/2026
raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3
Ascospores 64 25 3,400 9 25 480
Basidiospores 264 25 14,000 22 25 1,200
Chaetomium 2 100 27
Cladosporium 77 25 4,100
Curvularia
Epicoccum
Fusarium
Myrothecium
Nigrospora
Other brown
Other colorless
Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 35 25 1,900 12 25 640
Pithomyces
Rusts
Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes 27 100 360 1 100 13
Stachybotrys
Stemphylium
Torula
Ulocladium
Zygomycetes
Background debris (1-4+) 2+ 2+
Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 < 13
Pollen/m3 < 13 13
Skin cells (1-4+) < 1+ 1+
Sample volume (liters) 75 75
§ TOTAL SPORES/m3 24,000 2,300
Comments:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 2 of 5 Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.
† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.
††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
§ Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. 136
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY
Location: 0415-03:

Main room SW
0415-04:

Main room NE
Comments (see below) None None
Lab ID-Version‡: 22602156-1 22602157-1
Analysis Date: 04/15/2026 04/15/2026
raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3
Ascospores 3 25 160 15 25 800
Basidiospores 14 25 750 32 25 1,700
Chaetomium 1 100 13
Cladosporium 4 25 210 1 25 53
Curvularia
Epicoccum
Fusarium
Myrothecium
Nigrospora
Other brown 1 100 13 2 100 27
Other colorless
Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 13 25 690 11 25 590
Pithomyces
Rusts
Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes
Stachybotrys
Stemphylium
Torula
Ulocladium
Zygomycetes
Background debris (1-4+) 3+ 2+
Hyphal fragments/m3 27 < 13
Pollen/m3 40 < 13
Skin cells (1-4+) 2+ 1+
Sample volume (liters) 75 75
§ TOTAL SPORES/m3 1,800 3,200
Comments:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 3 of 5 Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.
† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.
††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
§ Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. 137
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY
Location: 0415-05:

Men's restroom center
0415-06:

Women's restroom center
Comments (see below) None None
Lab ID-Version‡: 22602158-1 22602159-1
Analysis Date: 04/15/2026 04/15/2026
raw ct. % read spores/m3 raw ct. % read spores/m3
Ascospores 5 25 270 2 25 110
Basidiospores 13 25 690 9 25 480
Chaetomium
Cladosporium 5 25 270 2 25 110
Curvularia
Epicoccum
Fusarium
Myrothecium
Nigrospora
Other brown
Other colorless
Penicillium/Aspergillus types† 13 25 690 16 25 850
Pithomyces
Rusts
Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes
Stachybotrys
Stemphylium
Torula
Ulocladium
Zygomycetes
Background debris (1-4+) 2+ 3+
Hyphal fragments/m3 < 13 27
Pollen/m3 < 13 40
Skin cells (1-4+) 1+ 2+
Sample volume (liters) 75 75
§ TOTAL SPORES/m3 1,900 1,500
Comments:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 4 of 5 Spore types listed without a count or data entry were not detected during the course of the analysis for the respective sample, indicating a raw count of <1 spore.
† The spores of Aspergillus and Penicillium (and others such as Acremonium, Paecilomyces) are small and round with very few distinguishing characteristics. They cannot be differentiated by non-viable sampling methods. Also, some species with very small spores are easily missed, and may be undercounted.
††Background debris indicates the amount of non-biological particulate matter present on the trace (dust in the air) and the resulting visibility for the analyst. It is rated from 1+ (low) to 4+ (high). Counts from areas with 4+ background debris should be regarded as minimal counts and may be higher than reported. It is important to account for samples volumes when evaluating dust levels.

The analytical sensitivity is the spores/m^3 divided by the raw count, expressed in spores/m^3, per spore and per sample.

For more information regarding analytical sensitivity, please contact QA by calling the laboratory. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
§ Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision. 138
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
SPORE TRAP REPORT: NON-VIABLE METHODOLOGY

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT
Project Analyst
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by AIHA LAP, LLC, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Murali Putty
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 5 of 5 139
Approved by:

Technical Manager
Murali Putty
Report for:

EPK Burlingame
Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc.
1521 East Orangethorpe Ave, Ste B
Fullerton, CA 92831
Regarding:

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
Project: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA EML ID: 4494803
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless noted in the Report Comments portion in the body of the report. Due to the nature of the analyses performed, field blank correction of results is not applied. The results relate only to the samples as received and tested.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC ("the Company"), a member of the Eurofins Built Environment Testing group of companies, shall have no liability to the client or the client's customer with respect to decisions or recommendations made, actions taken or courses of conduct implemented by either the client or the client's customer as a result of or based upon the Test Results.

In no event shall the Company be liable to the client with respect to the Test Results except for the Company's own willful misconduct or gross negligence nor shall the Company be liable for incidental or consequential damages or lost profits or revenues to the fullest extent such liability may be disclaimed by law, even if the Company has been advised of the possibility of such damages, lost profits or lost revenues. In no event shall the Company's liability with respect to the Test Results exceed the amount paid to the Company by the client therefor.

Dates of Analysis:

Direct microscopic exam - Qualitative (ASTM D7658): 04-15- 2026
Service SOPs: Direct microscopic exam - Qualitative (ASTM D7658) (EBET-DE-SOP84326) Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 1 of 4 140
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
Semi-Quantitative Method for Direct Microscopy of Surface Fungal Structures by ASTM D7658 Non-Fungal
Background
Debris †
Miscellaneous
Spores Present*
Fungal Loading†† Other
Comments
Notes
Lab ID-Version‡: 22602153-1, Analysis Date: 04/15/2026: Swab sample 0415-07: Kitchen cabinetry wood panel under N sink 2 Very few 5 Chaetomium (Hyphae, fruiting
bodies and clumps/chains of
spores)
None Mold Growth
Detected
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 2 of 4 ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
141
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
Semi-Quantitative Method for Direct Microscopy of Surface Fungal Structures by ASTM D7658 Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 3 of 4 †Non-Fungal Background Debris
The presence and relative amount of non-fungal background debris (e.g., skin cells, fibers, pollen, and dust) are documented in the Non-Fungal Background Debris section. Determination of the debris load is based on analytical judgment and reported using a semi-quantitative scale representing the relative abundance of observed material within the microscopic field of view. 0 No background debris is observed
1 ~< 5 % of a representative field of view
2 ~5 % and 25 % of a representative field of view
3 ~25 % and 75 % of a representative field of view
4 ~75 % and 90 % of a representative field of view
5 ~>90 % of a representative field of view
*Miscellaneous Spores
Slides/specimens are examined for the presence, quantity, and distribution of mold spores. Under typical conditions, a mixture of spore types is observed with a distribution consistent with that commonly found in outdoor environments. In such cases, the biological component of the sampled surface reflects background environmental deposition rather than localized growth. Observed spores may include basidiospores, myxomycetes, plant-associated spores such as ascospores, rusts, and smuts, as well as a variety of saprophytic genera, with no single spore type predominating. Many of these spores are not associated with growth on indoor building materials, as they require living plants, decaying organic matter, or specific ecological associations for development. When this mixed spore population is observed in combination with pollen, the likely source is outdoor air rather than indoor mold growth. The relative abundance of miscellaneous spores is graded and reported as none, very few, few, variety, or wide variety.

None – No miscellaneous spores detected
Very Few – ~1-10 miscellaneous spores of the same spore type detected Few – ~>10 miscellaneous spores of the same spore type detected Variety – ~1-10 miscellaneous spores of 2 or more spore types detected Wide Variety – ~>10 miscellaneous spores of 2 or more spore types detected ††Fungal Loading
Quantities of molds observed with associated mycelial and/or sporulating structures are reported in the Fungal Loading section. Analytical judgement is applied to assess the level of fungal loading present in the sample. Results are expressed using a semi-quantitative rating scale that reflects the relative abundance of material observed within the examined microscopic field of view. 0 No fungal material is observed
1 ~< 5 % of a representative field of view
2 ~5 % and 25 % of a representative field of view
3 ~25 % and 75 % of a representative field of view
4 ~75 % and 90 % of a representative field of view
5 ~>90 % of a representative field of view
‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".
142
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
Semi-Quantitative Method for Direct Microscopy of Surface Fungal Structures by ASTM D7658

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT
Project Analyst
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by AIHA LAP, LLC, or any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Murali Putty
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 4 of 4 143
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
MoldRANGE™, California Climate: Extended Outdoor Comparison U.S. Patent No. 10,387,458
Outdoor Location: 0415-01, Baseline West exterior entrance Fungi Identified Outdoor Typical Outdoor Data for: Typical Outdoor Data for:
data April in California†
Köppen-Geiger climate code¹ "Csa"
Mediterranean/hot summer (n‡=4025)
The entire year in California†
Köppen-Geiger climate code¹ "Csa"
Mediterranean/hot summer (n‡=45232)
Project zip code 94556 spores/m3 very
low
low med high very
high
freq % very
low
low med high very
high
freq %
Generally able to grow indoors*
Alternaria - 13 13 27 67 110 60 13 13 27 67 110 57
Bipolaris/Drechslera group - 7 13 13 27 53 11 7 13 13 27 53 12 Chaetomium - 7 13 13 27 40 20 7 13 13 27 40 23
Cladosporium 4,100 100 160 450 1,200 1,800 94 110 210 590 1,500 2,600 95 Curvularia - 7 13 13 31 53 2 7 13 13 27 53 6
Nigrospora - 7 8 13 27 40 6 7 13 13 40 80 12
Other brown - 8 13 13 40 53 37 13 13 13 40 53 38
Penicillium/Aspergillus types 1,900 53 53 160 370 640 61 53 80 210 540 960 71 Stachybotrys - 7 13 13 27 67 5 7 13 13 39 67 5
Torula - 7 13 13 40 67 14 7 13 13 40 67 12
Seldom found growing indoors**
Ascospores 3,400 25 53 110 350 690 68 25 50 110 320 640 65 Basidiospores 14,000 40 53 200 750 1,600 90 38 53 200 850 2,100 87 Rusts - 13 13 27 53 100 35 8 13 17 53 88 26
Smuts, Periconia, Myxomycetes 360 13 20 53 150 290 74 13 17 53 150 270 74 § TOTAL SPORES/m3 24,000
¹Köppen-Geiger climate codes are based upon a climate classification scheme for large geographic areas. The "MoldRANGE, California Climate" report uses the sampling location zipcode to identify the Köppen-Geiger climate code in that area. Because California has such diverse climates, this approach sharpens the precision of the MoldRANGE reporting system, providing more reliable estimates of the range and average concentrations of the different airborne fungal spore types for each region. Additional information on the Köppen-Geiger climate classification system can be found on the last page of this report. †The Typical Outdoor Data represents the typical outdoor spore levels across North America for the time period and climate code indicated.

The last column represents the frequency of occurrence. The very low, low, med, high, and very high values represent the 10, 20, 50, 80, and 90 percentile values of the spore type when it is detected. For example, if the frequency of occurrence is 63% and the low value is 53, it would mean that the given spore type is detected 63% of the time and, when detected, 20% of the time it is present in levels above the detection limit and below 53 spores/m3. These values are updated periodically, and if enough data is not available to make a statistically meaningful assessment, it is indicated with a dash.
‡ n is the sample size used to calculate the MoldRange, California Climate data summarized in the table. * The spores in this category are generally capable of growing on wet building materials in addition to growing outdoors. Building related growth is dependent upon the fungal type, moisture level, type of material, and other factors. Cladosporium is one of the predominant spore types worldwide and is frequently present in high numbers. Penicillium/Aspergillus species colonize both outdoor and indoor wet surfaces rapidly and are very easily dispersed. Other genera are usually present in lesser numbers. ** These fungi are generally not found growing on wet building materials. For example, the rusts and smuts are obligate plant pathogens.

However, in each group there are notable exceptions. For example, agents of wood decay are members of the basidiomycetes and high counts of a single morphological type of basidiospore on an inside sample should be considered significant. § Total Spores/m3 has been rounded to two significant figures to reflect analytical precision.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 1 of 3 144
U.S. Patent No. 10,387,458
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
Understanding Köppen-Geiger Climate Codes
Outdoor airborne fungal spore concentrations are strongly influenced by climate and weather patterns, often resulting in pronounced seasonal and diurnal cycles (Burge, 1995). The seasonal climatic changes directly affect the growth cycles of plants, thereby influencing fungal growth, spore maturation and release cycles. By evaluating outdoor spore concentration across similar climatic zones, rather than for the state as a whole, it is possible to provide a more precise and reliable estimate of typical outdoor spore levels and the frequency of occurrence for different airborne fungal spore types in a given area.

A widely used system for classifying climate was developed in the late nineteenth century by the climatologist Wladimir Köppen.

He later collaborated with another climatologist Rudolf Geiger in making modifications to his original system. As new climatic data has become available other individuals have submitted revisions and modifications to this system which are commonly referred to as modified Köppen-Geiger climate classification systems.

The Köppen-Geiger climate classification system is a widely used system that provides an objective numerical definition of climate types in terms of climatic elements such as temperature, rainfall, and other seasonal characteristics. The modified Köppen-Geiger climate classification system adopted here includes 6 major climate categories designated by a capital letter:

A Tropical
B Dry
C Mediterranean (Temperate)
D Continental (Temperate)
E Polar
H Timberline
In order to represent the main climatic types, additional letter designations are added. Except for the Dry climates and Polar climates the second letter refers to rainfall regime. The second letter for Dry climates differentiates Dry Steppe climates from Dry Desert climates. The second letter for Polar climates differentiates Polar Tundra climates from Polar Ice climates. For all 6 major climate categories the third letter refers to temperature characteristics, and the fourth to special features of the climate.

California is unique in that it has a more diverse array of climate types than any other state. Based upon data mapped by the California Department of Fish and Game (2003), California displays 11 distinct climate types as defined by a modified KöppenGeiger climate classification system:

BSh Semi-arid, steppe hot
BSk Semi-arid, steppe
BSkn Semi-arid, steppe w/summer fog
BWh Arid low latitude desert hot
BWk Arid mid latitude desert
Csa Mediterranean/hot summer
Csb Mediterranean/cool summer
Csbn Mediterranean/summer fog
Dsb Cool continental/dry summer
Dsc Cold winter/dry summer
H Highland/Timberline
This report groups California zip codes in relation to these climate codes and summarizes the MoldRANGE™ data by month and by year within each climate code.

REFERENCES
California Department of Fish and Game, Atlas of the Biodiversity of California, p. 15, 2003.

Burge, Harriet A. Bioaerosols. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, pp. 163-171, 1995.

Interpretation of the data contained in this report is left to the client or the persons who conducted the field work. This report is provided for informational and comparative purposes only and should not be relied upon for any other purpose. "Typical outdoor data" are based on the results of the analysis of samples delivered to and analyzed by Eurofins Built Environment Testing and assumptions regarding the origins of those samples. Sampling techniques, contaminants infecting samples, unrepresentative samples and other similar or dissimilar factors may affect these results. In addition, Eurofins Built Environment Testing may not have received and tested a representative number of samples for every region or time period. Eurofins Built Environment Testing hereby disclaims any liability for any and all direct, indirect, punitive, incidental, special or consequential damages arising out of the use or interpretation of the data contained in, or any actions taken or omitted in reliance upon, this report.

Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 2 of 3 145
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC
111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 122, Burlingame, CA 94010
Client: Titan Environmental Solutions, Inc. (833) 465-5857 www.eurofinsus.com/Built C/O: EPK Burlingame
Re: 139176-LM; La Sala, 2100 Donald Drive,
Moraga, CA
Date of Sampling: 04-15-2026
Date of Receipt: 04-15-2026
Date of Report: 04-15-2026
MoldRANGE™, California Climate: Extended Outdoor Comparison

PROJECT ANALYST AND SIGNATORY REPORT
Project Analyst
The test report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by any agency of the federal government. The Company reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. ‡ A "Version" indicated by -"x" after the Lab ID# with a value greater than 1 indicates a sample with amended data. The revision number is reflected by the value of "x".

Analyst: Murali Putty
Eurofins Built Environment Testing West, LLC EMLab ID: 4494803, Page 3 of 3 146
Town of Moraga La Sala Building — Attachment B
Preliminary Planning-Level Cost Summary Page 1 of 1

ATTACHMENT B
Preliminary Planning-Level Cost Summary
La Sala Building — Hacienda de las Flores, 2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556 The following planning-level cost information is intended to compare general order-of-magnitude options for La Sala. These estimates are not bid results and are not final project budgets. Actual costs would depend on final scope, hazardous materials requirements, environmental handling, utility disconnections, site stabilization, contingency, contractor pricing, and unknown field conditions.

Option Planning-Level Cost Notes
Demolition Base estimate approx.
$109,000; engineer’s
estimate approx.
$150,000; overall budget
need may approach
$200,000
Includes demolition, permitting, temporary fencing, utility caps, hazardous-materials allowance, environmental
handling, site stabilization, contingency, and unknowns.

Final cost would be determined by bids.

Limited repair /
reopening
Approx. $75,000+ Addresses immediate dampness/remediation work only.

Does not address roof, foundation, site movement, or
broader building-system needs.

Basic repair /
stabilization
Approx. $350,000–
$400,000
Includes dampness/remediation work, re-roofing, and
basic foundation stabilization. Does not fully restore, level, modernize, or repurpose the building.

Enhanced repair /
stabilization
Approx. $750,000–
$800,000
Includes more substantial foundation work, roof work,
remediation, and secondary building/utility repairs. Does not include broader modernization or new programmatic
improvements.

Full repair /
improvement
$1 million+ / to be
determined
Would require a clear long-term use and may need to
consider creek-bank stabilization or other site
improvements. Cost and scope would depend on future
direction.

Site Condition Note
The building is located near the creek, and preliminary cost information notes ongoing creek-bank movement. If the Town were to make a major reinvestment in La Sala, the creek-bank condition would need to be considered and could significantly increase the cost and complexity of a long-term repair or improvement project.

Cost Basis
The ranges above are based on preliminary cost information that included a direct demolition estimate of approximately $109,000; basic foundation repair estimate of approximately $173,000; enhanced foundation repair estimate of approximately $563,000; re-roofing estimate of approximately $139,000; dampness/remediation estimate of approximately $48,000; and other related items. The ranges have been rounded and grouped for planning-level comparison.
147
0 1,500 3,000
Feet
±
June, 2026
La Sala Building
Hacienda De Las Flores Park
Site and Location Map
Town of Moraga
Hall Dr
Campolindo Dr
Overhill Rd
Glorie tta B
lvd
Ascot Dr
Oak D r
Rheem Blvd
Moraga Way
Glorietta
Blvd
Mulholland
Open Space
Preserve
Campolindo
High School
Camin
o Ricar do
Iv y
Dr
Camino Pablo
Larch Ave
Canyon Rd
Crossbrook
Dr
Valley View
Dr
Ardith
Dr
Mora
ga Rd
Miramonte High
School
Moraga
Country Club
NYON
MORAGA
Pineh ur st Rd
Rimer
Dr
Redwood
egional Park
Saint
Marys
Rd
Sweet Dr
Wo odview Dr
C
al le Kathry n
Lucas Dr
Lafayette
Community Park
Las Trampas Creek
Rheem Blvd
Birchwood Dr
Draeger Dr
Moraga
Commons Park Saint Mary's
College of
California
Buck h orn C reek
Larch
Ave
Tha rp Dr
Shann on Ct
Rancho Laguna
Park
Camino Pablo
Elementary
School
Contra Costa County
Moraga
Town of
Moraga
Limits
ClifiSttPkEiTTGiSfGhGThliIMETI/NASAUSGSBf Ld MtEPA
Donald Dr
Donald Dr
La Sala Building
Devin Dr
Hacienda De
Moraga Rd
Las Flores Park
Attachment C
148
Town of Moraga - La Sala Building — Attachment D
Existing Conditions Photos Page 1 of 3
La Sala Building — Existing Conditions Photos
Hacienda de las Flores, 2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556 The following photographs document existing conditions at the La Sala building, including roof deterioration and water intrusion, foundation cracking and structural separation, and site impacts associated with ongoing land movement near the creek.

Source: Photographs provided by Town of Moraga Public Works staff, June 2026.

Roof Conditions and Water Intrusion
Figure F-1. Hole in deteriorated wood shake roof
Figure F-2. Original wood shake roof exposed
beneath failed tile roofing
149
Town of Moraga - La Sala Building — Attachment D
Existing Conditions Photos Page 2 of 3
Figure F-3. Roof leak / water intrusion at interior
ceiling and light fixture
Foundation Cracking and Structural Separatio
Figure F-4. Foundation cracking at exterior wall Figure F-5. Separation gap at chimney 150
Town of Moraga - La Sala Building — Attachment D
Existing Conditions Photos Page 3 of 3
Figure F-6. Separation gap at building addition
Site and Land-Movement Conditions
Figure F-7. Patio separation gap attributed to land
movement
Figure F-8. Patio area closed to use due to ground
movement
151

TOWN OF MORAGA

TOWN COUNCIL MEETING
July 08, 2026
Addendum(s) to Published Agenda
9: Department Reports
9B: Receive the report and direct staff to p roceed with demolition planning for the La Sala building located at the Hacienda de las Flores property
Updates Include:
• Public Communication Received Prior to Meeting
152







 

 !"#$%&! '( #)$%*
+,-% ././0102 3453 67
8
%9% :%;%%
!<%;%%&=>#(#)'#)!*? @A!# 7#(A
=#(A&=>#(#)'#)!*?
>A#$ #$

#$&=>#(#)'#)!*? B%>>C DAA!
;AA!&=>#(#)'#)!*? E>#;#= ;A%
(;A%&=>#(#)'#)!*? <$
F%>
<$'%>&=>#(#)'#)!*
FGH4 ;A! %=#A >A(A$#% I>= !A% ;% >(#$AJ#A$)  $ 'A' A$! > K%$ ##';=%$! $%!! C >%'($AJ% ;% !%$%> #$ $< ;% '$%$! A! !#I%) LMNNOP
Q RS TUVOWXNY OZZOTM[ UO U\M [MSON]U]OW O^ U\]T \]TUOV]_ `a]N[]WXb QU `MNOWXT UO U\M cOdW RW[ ]UT VMT][MWUTe c\MY SaTU \RfM ]WZaU RW[ TUVOWX _OWT][MVRU]OWb cVRWTZRVMW_YP ZNMRTMbb
c\RWg YOaP
hRWMU iO``T
jklkmno mpql rstuvwx y z{| }~€~u~ y ‚ƒ„
ww†
‡„„ˆ‰pkkwƒ„
ww†Šw‹‹Œ~Šw{k{Œ
kuwu~kŒŽkzz†zzzzzzz}‘’“”ˆ{”mv|z•–z•—m˜”™šz›œƒ|—mž‰—m˜Ÿ|—m˜ žl“œ¡ˆ’z•’¢šjr£zz¤¥¦k¦153 
















 !"#$%&' !"#("%)##"*+#,

-#././0102345678
97:!';;#+&<:!'';;#+(;" = *' *),
>?+@A#+=##; !A";' !"#("%)##"*+#*B# "+C%D%!)!)!;<" + EF-GH4-%!)#; !"!=!+ #?A";)!?#%#"= +!I !+*J+'!'!+)"<#+  '%;#+)+#))D"#'=+!I#%#)#+?#" +?+C%#'+#+)!)) A#* J# "+'!8#;:#")4
G!))"<"!)!+=;#+#%# =#+? !#;"#A#""!+=KLMNOOPQRSTKUVWWRWXA"?#;!!+A %#B Y  :!?!+=)!+'#G% Z#)##++<"#Z!)+!'#A)'%< ++!+=* -%#) AA"#<""#';;#+?)<")!+=%!)'")#A '!+:#' )#A%#'""#+) #A%# :!?!+=*G)%?:#+#?% %#'""#+) #A%#:!?!+=!) ?!"#' +?A"#)## :#"#)A  'A #+!+ +? ;#+A"#)"'#); !+ !+!+=!* G!)+#?!+%#) AA"#<"% %#:!?!+=C ))#?[<"!"!)')!+=[ ) < "A%#'""#+ "#'"# !+<"=" ;[ +?% );#<"=" ;)% Z#% ?:##!;!+ #?[ '!+=%#)< '#<"Z!?# %#;%#<:!'*J#;!!+%#+C?+:#C!%<#"; +#+#AA#'<+7 ") +? $#'"# !+AA#"!+=)*
Y!+'#%#-C+!)!+%#<"'#))A?#)!=+!+= +#C7 ") +?$#'"# !+; )#"< +% ; DC# "#';;#+? ??!!+ '% +=#)%##+!"#\ '!#+? <"<#"D[G)"+=D"=#+'!?#A#" A"%#"< ++!+= +? +D '!+?#;!)%%!):!?!+=*G+)# ?GC?"=# ?<!+A%#A!") #"+ !Z#!)#?!+%#) AA"#<"]F+?#" #%#;!+!;; +?# )#^<#+)!Z#"#< !")+#'#)) "D "#"+%#:!?!+= ) #C%#"#!' +:#)#? )!C )<"!"%#"#'#+')!+=* -% +DA"D"'+)!?#" !+*
 !"#$%
62_`#"+C?J"!Z#[8" =
abcbdefdghijklmnopqrstuvwxvmvyqz{|}oo~
||€gbbo{|}oo~‚oƒƒ„
v‚
osbsw„}bmomvb„†brr~r‡ˆrrrrrru‰Š‹Œw€sŒ
dntrŽrdŒ‘ˆ’r“”{tyd•–d—t•d˜–c‡‹”™€ŠrŠš›laˆrrœm›b›154 SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS/PRESENTATIONS:

To: n/a
From: n/a
Subject: Supplemental Materials Received During the Meeting Meeting Date: July 8, 2026

TOWN OF MORAGA STAFF REPORT

RECOMMENDATION
Supplemental Materials Received During the Meeting

ATTACHMENTS
Town Manager Update - Rheem Blvd Project Update
9A Presentation - FY27 Budget Update
9B Presentation - La Sala Building Update
155
2025 & 2026 Street Rehabilitation
Project Update
1 • Informational update only —
no Council action tonight.
• Construction began July 6
on Augusta Drive.
• Project includes storm drain
repairs, concrete work, and
roadway rehabilitation.
• Near-term focus: Rheem
Boulevard shoulder repair in
July.
156
Rheem Boulevard Work 2
Planned Work Window
July 13–31, 2026
One Week Detour
Traffic Control
• Westbound Rheem
remains open.
• Eastbound traffic
detoured via Harold
Drive and Scofield Drive.
• Local, driveway, and
emergency access
maintained.

Drivers should plan ahead
and expect minor delays of
about 5 minutes.
157
Fiscal Year 2026
-27
Budget Update
Town Council
July 8, 2026
158
Recommendation Adopt a
resolution:

Amending the
Fiscal Year
2026-27
General Fund
Budget
Amending the
Fiscal Year
2026-27
Capital
Improvement
Budget
159
General Fund
In millions
FY 2025-26
Revised
Budget
FY 2026-27
Adopted
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 2026-27
Recommended
Revised Budget
Revenues &
Transfers In $ 13.29 $ 13.76 $ 0.20 $13.97
Expenditures &
Transfers Out 14.23 13.76 0.20 13.97
Revenue less
Expenditures $ (0.94) $ 0.00 $ 0.00
160
General Fund Revenues (in millions)
FY 2025-26
Revised
Budget
FY 2026-27
Adopted
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 2026-27
Recommended
Revised Budget
General Revenues Total $ 9.24 $ 9.59 $ 0.0 $ 9.59
Department Revenues
General Government $ 0.54 $ 0.40 $ - $0.40
Parks & Recreation 1.23 1.26 0.14 1.40
Planning 0.65 0.67 - 0.67
Police 0.07 0.07 - 0.07
Public Works 0.70 0.74 0.06 0.80
Total Department Revenues $ 3.20 $ 3.15 $0.20 $3.35
Transfers In $ 0.84 $ 1.02 $ - $ 1.02
Total Revenues & Transfers In $ 13.29 $ 13.76 $ 0.20 $13.97 161
General Fund
Revenue
Adjustments
Department Description Amount
Parks & Recreation
After School Enrichment Program $ 108,000
Senior Programming Revenue 35,000
Total Parks & Recreation $ 143,000
Public Works Encroachment Permit Revenue $ 58,585
Total Public Works $ 58,585
Total Revenue Adjustments $ 201,585
162
General Fund Appropriations (in millions)
FY 2025-26
Revised
Budget
FY 2026-27
Adopted
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 2026-27
Recommended
Revised Budget
Administrative Services $ 1.89 $ 1.74 $ (0.04) $ 1.70
General Government 2.28 2.33 - 2.33
Parks & Recreation 2.06 2.16 0.14 2.30
Planning 0.98 0.99 - 0.99
Police 3.85 3.99 0.04 4.03
Public Works 2.33 2.43 0.06 2.49
Transfers Out 0.08 0.11 - 0.11
Total Expenditures & Transfers Out $ 14.23 $ 13.76 $ 0.20 $ 13.96 163
General Fund
Appropriation
Adjustments
Department Description Amount
Administrative
Services
Decrease in General Liability Insurance
Premiums $ (88,664)
Increase to 1.0 FTE Accounting Technician 52,645
Total Administrative Services $ (36,019)
Parks & Recreation
After School Enrichment Contract Services $ 66,000
Temporary Staff for After School Enrichment
Program 40,000
Increase to 0.70 FTE Administrative Assistant 19,808
Supplies and Materials 17,192
Total Parks & Recreation $ 143,000
Police Department Reclassification of 2 Police Corporals to Police Sergeants $ 36,019
Total Police $ 36,019
Public Works Building, Storm Drain, & Road Maintenance
Contractual Services $ 58,585
Total Public Works $ 58,585
Total Appropriation Adjustments $ 201,585
164
General Fund Reserves
FY 2026-27
Recommended Operating Expenditures $ 13,851,577
50% Reserve Requirement $ 6,925,788
Reserve Balance as of June 30, 2025 $ 6,824,996
Required Contribution $ 100,792
165
Authorized
Positions
Increase
Parks &
Rec Admin
Assistant -
from 0.45
to 0.70 FTE
Increase
ASD
Account
Tech from

0.60 to 1.0
FTE
Reclassify
2 Police
Corporals
to Police
Sergeants

42.15 Total
Authorized
FTE
166
Other Funds
167
Capital Budget
Adjustment
Shade Structure at
Commons Park All Access
Playground • Total Cost $218,000 • $200,000 from Moraga Community Foundation
• $18,000 from Asset
Replacement Fund
168
Recommendation Adopt a
resolution:

Amending the
Fiscal Year
2026-27
General Fund
Budget
Amending the
Fiscal Year
2026-27 Capital
Improvement
Budget
169
Questions?
170
General Liability
Insurance Premiums
 70% increase in premiums
in FY24
 Town increased it
deductible in FY25 to lower
premium increases
 In FY26, premiums
decreased by 10%.
171
1 La Sala Building Update
Town Council Update | July 8, 2026
Presented by Public Works Director/Town Engineer
& Parks & Recreation
La Sala
172
2 Tonight’s Action: Choose a Direction for La Sala
Staff recommends demolition planning rather than investing in reopening repairs.
173
3 La Sala: Previous Use, Context, and Condition
Previous use
• Parks & Recreation
programming
• Community / Hacienda
support
• Meetings, storage, Town
operations
Site context
• Located near the creek
• Part of Hacienda campus
• Older support building, not core Hacienda structure (Formally called “Offices”)
• Deck closed in 2025 due to slope stability
174
4 2016 Feasibility Study: La Sala
Phase 1: La Sala retained / minor renovation
Parks & Recreation office + community use
Future Phase 2: La Sala removed
expanded drop-off courtyard / patio
Key point: the removal idea was studied/presented/accepted; the project was not implemented.
175
5 2016 Study Accepted; Project Never Advanced
2016
Council accepted
2016 conceptual
feasibility
study
Phase 2
Concept
Future phase
showed La Sala
removed
Not
Advanced
Follow-up efforts
focused elsewhere; no
La Sala project
advanced
2019
Asset report:
“Will not be replaced”.

No funding allocated
Now
La Sala is closed; Town
needs direction
The 2016 study presented La Sala removal as part of a future phase, but follow-up efforts did not advance a La Sala repair, reuse, replacement, or removal project.
176
6 Why This Is Before Council Now The building is closed Water damage and related
environmental conditions
require work before reopening.

The repair path is unfunded
No funded repair, reuse,
replacement, or removal path
exists today.

Doing nothing has a cost
A closed building still needs
monitoring and maintenance.

Roof repairs needed prior to
winter
Staff needs direction before spending funds on either reopening, repairs, or demolition advancement.
177
7 Program Impacts Have Been Managed
Most programming
preserved
Parks & Recreation relocated
most affected programming to
other Town facilities and
outdoor spaces.

Temporary accommodations
Other Hacienda rooms,
outdoor program space,
temporary restrooms, and
storage have been used to
keep programs running.

Remaining loss
Cooking/culinary programs
cannot currently continue
because La Sala has the
Town’s public recreation
kitchen.
178
8 Minimum Reopening Work vs. Long-Term Use
Minimum to reopen:$50K-$100K If keeping for long-term use: $350K $1M+ Environmental
-Remove/handle
affected materials
Roof/leak repair
-Needed to prevent
recurrence
Building restoration
-Replace impacted
finishes
(walls/ceiling)
Foundation/stabilization
-Substantial cost to repair
or improve
Creek-bank condition
-Must be considered
before major reinvestment
-A creek set back should be
considered
Base repairs are needed to reopen; reliable long-term use would require additional stabilization and site work. 179
9 Parks & Recs Open Space Master Planning Context:

La Sala Was Reviewed in Context
Existing La Sala
Not identified as a viable
future facility opportunity asis.

Future space needs
Indoor recreation,
community programming,
and support-space needs
remain part of PROS.

Removal does not close off future planning. It may create more flexibility for the Hacienda site.
180
10 Cost Context: Repair Costs Quickly Exceed Demolition Limited repair / reopening $50k–$100k
Immediate work only
Recommended Direction:

Demolition planning
~$200k overall budget
Bid + contingency + unknowns
Basic repair / stabilization $350k–$400k
Repair + roof + basic foundation
Enhanced repair / stabilization $750k–$800k
Substantial repair / stabilization
Full repair / improvement $1M+
Clear long-term use + site issues
$0 $1M+
Staff recommends demolition planning over repair investment due to unfunded reopening work and larger long-term building/site needs Final demolition cost will be determined through competitive bid process 181
11 What Demolition Planning Would Include
Hazardous materials
Testing and handling
requirements
Utilities
Disconnect, cap, or remove as
needed
Demolition
Remove building and protect
adjacent facilities and
operations
Site stabilization
Grade, stabilize, and provide
temporary/minimal restoration
Salvage / reuse
Evaluate material reuse or
recycling where feasible
Future use
Coordinate cleared-area
options for Hacienda
opportunities
Bid documents can be structured to support reuse or salvage where feasible and practical.
182
12 Recommended Next Steps
1 Prepare Final Scope
Demolition bid
package
2 Receive Bid Results
Actual contractor
pricing
3 CEQA
Determination at
award
4 Funding + Award
Council decision
before work
Council will see and approve environmental determination, funding recommendation, and contract award before any work occurs. 183
13 Recommended Direction
Direct staff to proceed with demolition planning
• Prepare demolition plans, specifications, and bid documents • Include hazardous materials, utilities, demolition, site stabilization, and environmental handling requirements
• Evaluate salvage, reuse, or recycling opportunities where feasible • Return with CEQA determination, bid results, contract award, and funding recommendation
Questions?
184

← All documents from this meeting