Moreno Valley City Council
December 19, 2023

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 28 56 66 388 150 841 77 510 262 49 97 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 28 56 66 388 150 841 77 510 262 49 97 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 32 64 75 441 170 956 88 580 298 56 110 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 75 419 374 644 1974 881 116 710 317 194 346 9 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1841 50 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 32 64 75 441 170 956 88 580 298 56 0 113 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1891 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 2.8 3.8 23.4 3.9 54.7 4.8 15.4 8.3 1.5 0.0 5.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 2.8 3.8 23.4 3.9 54.7 4.8 15.4 8.3 1.5 0.0 5.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 75 419 374 644 1974 881 116 710 317 194 0 356 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.15 0.20 0.68 0.09 1.09 0.76 0.82 0.94 0.29 0.00 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 127 419 374 644 1974 881 127 710 317 246 0 356 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.48 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.8 30.6 30.9 38.7 20.2 41.0 46.1 38.4 8.3 45.4 0.0 35.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.8 1.2 1.5 0.0 48.5 21.5 10.1 37.5 0.8 0.0 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 1.3 1.6 11.6 1.6 35.3 2.8 7.7 6.0 0.7 0.0 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.6 31.3 32.1 40.2 20.2 89.4 67.6 48.5 45.8 46.2 0.0 37.4 LnGrp LOS DCCDCFEDDDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 171 1567 966 169
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.3 68.1 49.4 40.3
Approach LOS D E D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 39.6 27.2 10.4 22.8 8.1 58.7 9.5 23.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.0 23.2 7.0 18.8 7.0 51.2 7.0 18.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 25.4 5.8 6.8 7.2 3.7 56.7 3.5 17.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 58.2
HCM 6th LOS E
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2259 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: I-215 NB Ramps & Fair Isle Dr/Box Springs Rd 02/11/2021 Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour Gateway Highlands Residential Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 284 360 0 0 516 863 60 47000
Future Volume (veh/h) 284 360 0 0 516 863 60 47000
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 330 419 0 0 902 802 81 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 00000000
Cap, veh/h 397 2650 0 0 1104 935 673 353 0
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.19 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3705 0 0 1900 1610 3619 1900 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 330 419 0 0 902 802 81 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 0 0 1900 1610 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 37.9 41.6 1.9 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.2 3.5 0.0 0.0 37.9 41.6 1.9 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 397 2650 0 0 1104 935 673 353 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.86 0.12 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 421 2650 0 0 1104 935 673 353 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.93 0.93 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 17.5 33.9 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 6.7 10.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 17.1 16.6 0.9 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 23.5 27.5 34.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A A A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 749 1704 81
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.7 25.4 34.3
Approach LOS C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.4 15.3 62.1 22.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 73.4 12.0 57.4 18.6
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 11.2 43.6 3.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.2 0.1 8.6 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.0
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2260 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
4: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd N. 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour Gateway Highlands Residential Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 13 5 0 26
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 13 5 0 26
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 3 1 15 6 0 30
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 48 18 0 0 21 0
Stage 1 18 -----
Stage 2 30 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 967 1066 - - 1608 -
Stage 1 1010 -----
Stage 2 998 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 967 1066 - - 1608 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 967 -----
Stage 1 1010 -----
Stage 2 998 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 990 1608 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2261 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
5: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd S. 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour Gateway Highlands Residential Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 54 0 19 12 1 24
Future Vol, veh/h 54 0 19 12 1 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 57 0 20 13 1 25
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 54 27 0 0 33 0
Stage 1 27 -----
Stage 2 27 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 959 1054 - - 1592 -
Stage 1 1001 -----
Stage 2 1001 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 958 1054 - - 1592 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 958 -----
Stage 1 1001 -----
Stage 2 1000 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 0 0.3

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 958 1592 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.059 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9 7.3 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2262 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Box Springs Rd & Morton Rd 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - AM Peak Hour Gateway Highlands Residential Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 32 335 1299 12 45 80
Future Volume (veh/h) 32 335 1299 12 45 80
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 35 368 1427 13 49 88
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000
Cap, veh/h 79 2635 2370 22 344 376
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.73 0.65 0.65 0.19 0.19
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3705 3761 33 1810 1610
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 35 368 702 738 49 88
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1805 1894 1810 1610
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 3.1 22.5 22.5 2.3 4.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 3.1 22.5 22.5 2.3 4.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 79 2635 1167 1224 344 376
V/C Ratio(X) 0.44 0.14 0.60 0.60 0.14 0.23
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 127 2635 1167 1224 344 376
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.6 4.1 10.2 10.2 33.7 31.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.1 2.3 2.2 0.9 1.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 1.0 8.7 9.1 1.1 4.5
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.5 4.2 12.5 12.4 34.6 32.5
LnGrp LOS D A B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 403 1440 137
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.2 12.5 33.3
Approach LOS A B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.0 23.0 8.4 68.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 73.0 19.0 7.0 62.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 6.4 3.9 24.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.7 0.3 0.0 14.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.0
HCM 6th LOS B
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2263 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Sycamore Canyon Blvd & Fair Isle Dr 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 76 98 201 176 209 111 289 420 292 400 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 76 98 201 176 209 111 289 420 292 400 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 79 102 209 183 218 116 301 438 304 417 32 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 42 401 358 376 1470 655 147 1017 454 388 542 42 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.22 0.22 0.35 0.68 0.68 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1742 134 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 14 79 102 209 183 218 116 301 438 304 0 449 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1876 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 3.2 4.7 8.4 1.6 5.0 5.7 5.9 14.2 7.6 0.0 19.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 3.2 4.7 8.4 1.6 5.0 5.7 5.9 14.2 7.6 0.0 19.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 42 401 358 376 1470 655 147 1017 454 388 0 584 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.20 0.29 0.56 0.12 0.33 0.79 0.30 0.97 0.78 0.00 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 141 401 358 376 1470 655 201 1017 454 507 0 584 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.3 28.5 29.1 26.0 8.8 9.3 40.6 25.3 11.0 39.0 0.0 28.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 1.1 2.0 1.7 0.2 1.3 13.7 0.7 34.5 5.9 0.0 9.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.5 2.0 3.4 0.6 1.7 3.0 2.6 8.9 3.5 0.0 10.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.0 29.6 31.1 27.7 9.0 10.6 54.3 26.1 45.5 44.9 0.0 37.5 LnGrp LOS DCCCABDCDDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 195 610 855 753
Approach Delay, s/veh 31.7 16.0 39.8 40.5
Approach LOS C B D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.7 24.0 11.3 32.0 6.1 40.6 13.9 29.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.0 20.0 10.0 28.0 7.0 29.0 13.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.4 6.7 7.7 21.5 2.7 7.0 9.6 16.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 0.8 0.1 1.5 0.0 1.8 0.4 2.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.3
HCM 6th LOS C
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2264 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: I-215 NB Ramps & Fair Isle Dr/Box Springs Rd 02/11/2021 Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 363 778 0 0 260 326 96 29000
Future Volume (veh/h) 363 778 0 0 260 326 96 29000
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 386 828 0 0 330 312 113 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 00000000
Cap, veh/h 819 2487 0 0 781 662 804 422 0
Arrive On Green 0.23 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.22 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3705 0 0 1900 1610 3619 1900 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 386 828 0 0 330 312 113 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 0 0 1900 1610 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.5 8.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 12.7 2.3 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.5 8.3 0.0 0.0 11.1 12.7 2.3 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 819 2487 0 0 781 662 804 422 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.47 0.14 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 819 2487 0 0 781 662 804 422 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.7 5.7 0.0 0.0 18.9 19.4 28.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.7 2.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln3.6 2.7 0.0 0.0 5.1 5.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.1 6.0 0.0 0.0 20.6 21.8 28.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1214 642 113
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.6 21.1 28.5
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.0 25.0 41.0 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 62.0 21.0 37.0 20.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.3 10.5 14.7 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.2 1.0 3.1 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 16.9
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2265 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
3: Morton Rd & Project Driveway 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 09005
Future Vol, veh/h 0 09005
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 0 0 10 0 0 5
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 15 10 0 0 10 0
Stage 1 10 -----
Stage 2 5 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1009 1077 - - 1623 -
Stage 1 1018 -----
Stage 2 1023 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1009 1077 - - 1623 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1009 -----
Stage 1 1018 -----
Stage 2 1023 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1623 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio -----
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 0 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2266 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
4: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd N. 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 2 33 13 0 19
Future Vol, veh/h 2 2 33 13 0 19
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 3 3 44 17 0 25
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 78 53 0 0 61 0
Stage 1 53 -----
Stage 2 25 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 930 1020 - - 1555 -
Stage 1 975 -----
Stage 2 1003 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 930 1020 - - 1555 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 930 -----
Stage 1 975 -----
Stage 2 1003 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 973 1555 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2267 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
5: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd S. 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 38 1 32 41 0 26
Future Vol, veh/h 38 1 32 41 0 26
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 43 1 36 46 0 29
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 88 59 0 0 82 0
Stage 1 59 -----
Stage 2 29 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 918 1012 - - 1528 -
Stage 1 969 -----
Stage 2 999 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 918 1012 - - 1528 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 918 -----
Stage 1 969 -----
Stage 2 999 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 920 1528 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.048 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.1 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2268 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Box Springs Rd & Morton Rd 02/11/2021
Existing Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 85 702 545 30 42 41
Future Volume (veh/h) 85 702 545 30 42 41
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 89 731 568 31 44 43
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000
Cap, veh/h 126 2407 1925 105 442 505
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.67 0.55 0.55 0.24 0.24
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3705 3576 190 1810 1610
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 89 731 294 305 44 43
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1805 1866 1810 1610
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.3 7.6 7.8 7.9 1.7 1.7
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.3 7.6 7.8 7.9 1.7 1.7
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 126 2407 998 1032 442 505
V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.10 0.09
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 342 2407 998 1032 442 505
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.0 6.3 10.7 10.8 26.3 21.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.2 0.3 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.3
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 2.6 3.1 3.2 0.8 1.9
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.1 6.6 11.5 11.5 26.8 22.1
LnGrp LOS D A B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 820 599 87
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.1 11.5 24.5
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 64.0 26.0 10.2 53.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 60.0 22.0 17.0 39.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.6 3.7 6.3 9.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.1 0.2 0.1 3.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.0
HCM 6th LOS B
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2269 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2270 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Sycamore Canyon Blvd & Fair Isle Dr 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 29 60 73 418 157 878 81 533 307 58 112 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 29 60 73 418 157 878 81 533 307 58 112 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 68 83 475 178 998 92 606 349 66 127 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 76 383 341 679 1969 878 117 679 303 227 348 8 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1848 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 68 83 475 178 998 92 606 349 66 0 130 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1892 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 3.1 4.3 25.2 4.1 37.2 5.0 16.4 18.8 1.8 0.0 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 3.1 4.3 25.2 4.1 37.2 5.0 16.4 18.8 1.8 0.0 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 76 383 341 679 1969 878 117 679 303 227 0 356 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.18 0.24 0.70 0.09 1.14 0.79 0.89 1.15 0.29 0.00 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 127 383 341 679 1969 878 127 679 303 246 0 356 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.7 32.3 32.7 38.4 20.3 19.1 46.1 39.6 40.6 44.6 0.0 35.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 1.0 1.7 1.3 0.0 67.7 25.5 16.5 99.7 0.7 0.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 1.4 1.8 12.4 1.7 32.1 3.1 8.7 15.7 0.8 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.6 33.3 34.4 39.7 20.4 86.7 71.6 56.1 140.3 45.3 0.0 38.3 LnGrp LOS DCCDCFEEFDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 184 1651 1047 196
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.9 66.0 85.5 40.6
Approach LOS D E F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 41.5 25.2 10.5 22.8 8.2 58.5 10.5 22.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.0 21.2 7.0 18.8 7.0 51.2 7.0 18.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 27.2 6.3 7.0 8.0 3.8 39.2 3.8 20.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 69.3
HCM 6th LOS E
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2271 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: I-215 NB Ramps & Fair Isle Dr/Box Springs Rd 02/11/2021 Project Completion Without Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 314 399 0 0 548 944 69 49000
Future Volume (veh/h) 314 399 0 0 548 944 69 49000
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 365 464 0 0 983 868 93 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 00000000
Cap, veh/h 386 2650 0 0 1110 940 673 353 0
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.19 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3705 0 0 1900 1610 3619 1900 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 365 464 0 0 983 868 93 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 0 0 1900 1610 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.3 3.9 0.0 0.0 44.6 48.7 2.1 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.3 3.9 0.0 0.0 44.6 48.7 2.1 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 386 2650 0 0 1110 940 673 353 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.95 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.92 0.14 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 2650 0 0 1110 940 673 353 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 17.9 18.8 34.0 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 29.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.5 15.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln6.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 20.9 20.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 74.1 4.2 0.0 0.0 28.4 34.6 34.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E A A A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 829 1851 93
Approach Delay, s/veh 35.0 31.3 34.4
Approach LOS C C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.4 15.0 62.4 22.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 73.4 11.0 58.4 18.6
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.9 12.3 50.7 4.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.5 0.0 5.9 0.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.5
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2272 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
4: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd N. 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 16 5 0 30
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 16 5 0 30
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 3 1 19 6 0 35
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 57 22 0 0 25 0
Stage 1 22 -----
Stage 2 35 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 955 1061 - - 1603 -
Stage 1 1006 -----
Stage 2 993 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 955 1061 - - 1603 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 955 -----
Stage 1 1006 -----
Stage 2 993 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.7 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 979 1603 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2273 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
5: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd S. 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 0 22 12 1 28
Future Vol, veh/h 56 0 22 12 1 28
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 59 0 23 13 1 29
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 61 30 0 0 36 0
Stage 1 30 -----
Stage 2 31 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 950 1050 - - 1588 -
Stage 1 998 -----
Stage 2 997 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 949 1050 - - 1588 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 949 -----
Stage 1 998 -----
Stage 2 996 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9 0 0.3

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 949 1588 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.062 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9 7.3 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2274 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Box Springs Rd & Morton Rd 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 33 376 1408 16 52 83
Future Volume (veh/h) 33 376 1408 16 52 83
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 36 413 1547 18 57 91
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000
Cap, veh/h 80 2635 2360 27 344 377
Arrive On Green 0.04 0.73 0.65 0.65 0.19 0.19
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3705 3750 42 1810 1610
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 36 413 763 802 57 91
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1805 1892 1810 1610
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 3.5 26.0 26.0 2.6 4.6
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.9 3.5 26.0 26.0 2.6 4.6
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 80 2635 1166 1222 344 377
V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.16 0.65 0.66 0.17 0.24
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 127 2635 1166 1222 344 377
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.6 4.1 10.9 10.9 33.9 31.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.1 2.9 2.8 1.0 1.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 1.1 10.1 10.6 1.3 4.6
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.5 4.2 13.8 13.6 34.9 32.6
LnGrp LOS D A B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 449 1565 148
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.0 13.7 33.5
Approach LOS A B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.0 23.0 8.4 68.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 73.0 19.0 7.0 62.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 6.6 3.9 28.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.1 0.3 0.0 15.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.9
HCM 6th LOS B
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2275 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Sycamore Canyon Blvd & Fair Isle Dr 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 81 104 217 185 224 119 313 558 309 421 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 81 104 217 185 224 119 313 558 309 421 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 84 108 226 193 233 124 326 581 322 439 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 44 441 394 318 1429 637 155 1043 465 397 552 41 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.29 0.66 0.66 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1745 131 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 84 108 226 193 233 124 326 581 322 0 472 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1876 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 3.3 4.9 10.0 1.8 5.8 6.1 6.4 16.3 8.1 0.0 20.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 3.3 4.9 10.0 1.8 5.8 6.1 6.4 16.3 8.1 0.0 20.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 44 441 394 318 1429 637 155 1043 465 397 0 593 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.19 0.27 0.71 0.14 0.37 0.80 0.31 1.25 0.81 0.00 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 141 441 394 318 1429 637 181 1043 465 429 0 593 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.2 26.9 27.5 29.7 9.5 10.2 40.4 25.0 12.6 39.0 0.0 28.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.5 1.0 1.7 6.4 0.2 1.4 19.3 0.8 128.9 10.5 0.0 10.6 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.5 2.0 4.4 0.7 2.0 3.5 2.8 22.1 4.0 0.0 10.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.7 27.9 29.3 36.1 9.7 11.6 59.7 25.8 141.5 49.5 0.0 38.7 LnGrp LOS DCCDABECFDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 652 1031 794
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.0 19.5 95.1 43.1
Approach LOS C B F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.8 26.0 11.7 32.5 6.2 39.6 14.2 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 22.0 9.0 28.0 7.0 30.0 11.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.0 6.9 8.1 22.7 2.7 7.8 10.1 18.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.0 0.1 2.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 56.3
HCM 6th LOS E
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2276 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: I-215 NB Ramps & Fair Isle Dr/Box Springs Rd 02/11/2021 Project Completion Without Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 453 863 0 0 284 369 103 2 16 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 453 863 0 0 284 369 103 2 16 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 482 918 0 0 370 348 127 0 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 00000000
Cap, veh/h 858 2487 0 0 760 644 804 422 0
Arrive On Green 0.24 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.22 0.00 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3705 0 0 1900 1610 3619 1900 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 482 918 0 0 370 348 127 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 0 0 1900 1610 1810 1900 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.8 9.5 0.0 0.0 13.1 14.9 2.5 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.8 9.5 0.0 0.0 13.1 14.9 2.5 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 858 2487 0 0 760 644 804 422 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.54 0.16 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 858 2487 0 0 760 644 804 422 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.8 5.8 0.0 0.0 20.1 20.7 28.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 3.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.5 3.1 0.0 0.0 6.0 6.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 6.2 0.0 0.0 22.3 23.9 28.6 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A A A C C C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 1400 718 127
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 23.1 28.6
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.0 26.0 40.0 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 62.0 22.0 36.0 20.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.5 12.8 16.9 4.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.3 1.3 3.4 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.1
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2277 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
4: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd N. 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.4
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 2 37 14 0 24
Future Vol, veh/h 2 2 37 14 0 24
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 3 3 49 19 0 32
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 91 59 0 0 68 0
Stage 1 59 -----
Stage 2 32 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 914 1012 - - 1546 -
Stage 1 969 -----
Stage 2 996 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 914 1012 - - 1546 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 914 -----
Stage 1 969 -----
Stage 2 996 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.8 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 961 1546 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.006 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2278 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
5: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd S. 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 1 36 43 0 31
Future Vol, veh/h 40 1 36 43 0 31
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 45 1 40 48 0 35
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 99 64 0 0 88 0
Stage 1 64 -----
Stage 2 35 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 905 1006 - - 1520 -
Stage 1 964 -----
Stage 2 993 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 905 1006 - - 1520 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 905 -----
Stage 1 964 -----
Stage 2 993 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.2 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 907 1520 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.051 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2279 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Box Springs Rd & Morton Rd 02/11/2021
Project Completion Without Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 88 792 610 38 51 43
Future Volume (veh/h) 88 792 610 38 51 43
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 92 825 635 40 53 45
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000
Cap, veh/h 127 2447 1943 122 422 488
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.68 0.56 0.56 0.23 0.23
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3705 3544 217 1810 1610
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 92 825 332 343 53 45
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1805 1861 1810 1610
Q Serve(g_s), s 4.5 8.6 8.9 8.9 2.1 1.8
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.5 8.6 8.9 8.9 2.1 1.8
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 127 2447 1017 1048 422 488
V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.09
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 322 2447 1017 1048 422 488
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.0 6.1 10.5 10.5 27.2 22.5
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.7 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 2.9 3.5 3.6 1.0 2.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 48.7 6.4 11.4 11.4 27.9 22.8
LnGrp LOS D A B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 917 675 98
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.7 11.4 25.6
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 65.0 25.0 10.3 54.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 61.0 21.0 16.0 41.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.6 4.1 6.5 10.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.1 0.2 0.1 4.6
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.8
HCM 6th LOS B
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2280 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Sycamore Canyon Blvd & Fair Isle Dr 02/12/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 29 60 73 433 157 890 81 533 312 62 112 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 29 60 73 433 157 890 81 533 312 62 112 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 68 83 492 178 1011 92 606 355 70 127 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 76 383 341 679 1969 878 117 679 303 227 348 8 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1848 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 68 83 492 178 1011 92 606 355 70 0 130 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1892 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 3.1 4.3 26.2 4.1 37.2 5.0 16.4 18.8 1.9 0.0 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 3.1 4.3 26.2 4.1 37.2 5.0 16.4 18.8 1.9 0.0 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 76 383 341 679 1969 878 117 679 303 227 0 356 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.18 0.24 0.72 0.09 1.15 0.79 0.89 1.17 0.31 0.00 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 127 383 341 679 1969 878 127 679 303 246 0 356 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.7 32.3 32.7 38.8 20.3 19.1 46.1 39.6 40.6 44.6 0.0 35.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 1.0 1.7 1.3 0.0 73.1 25.5 16.5 107.0 0.8 0.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 1.4 1.8 12.9 1.7 33.4 3.1 8.7 16.3 0.8 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.6 33.3 34.4 40.2 20.4 92.1 71.6 56.1 147.6 45.4 0.0 38.3 LnGrp LOS DCCDCFEEFDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 184 1681 1053 200
Approach Delay, s/veh 36.9 69.3 88.3 40.8
Approach LOS D E F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 41.5 25.2 10.5 22.8 8.2 58.5 10.5 22.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.0 21.2 7.0 18.8 7.0 51.2 7.0 18.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 28.2 6.3 7.0 8.0 3.8 39.2 3.9 20.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 72.0
HCM 6th LOS E
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2281 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: I-215 NB Ramps & Fair Isle Dr/Box Springs Rd 02/12/2021 Project Completion With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 314 408 0 0 575 959 69 4 14 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 314 408 0 0 575 959 69 4 14 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 365 474 0 0 1004 892 50 46 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 00000000
Cap, veh/h 386 2650 0 0 1110 940 337 251 87
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.19 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3705 0 0 1900 1610 1810 1347 469
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 365 474 0 0 1004 892 50 0 62
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 0 0 1900 1610 1810 0 1816 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.3 4.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 51.7 2.3 0.0 2.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.3 4.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 51.7 2.3 0.0 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.26
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 386 2650 0 0 1110 940 337 0 338
V/C Ratio(X) 0.95 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.95 0.15 0.00 0.18 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 386 2650 0 0 1110 940 337 0 338
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 18.3 19.4 34.1 0.0 34.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 29.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 12.0 19.3 0.9 0.0 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln6.0 1.3 0.0 0.0 22.1 22.4 1.1 0.0 1.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 74.1 4.2 0.0 0.0 30.4 38.7 35.0 0.0 35.5 LnGrp LOS E A A A C D D A D
Approach Vol, veh/h 839 1896 112
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.6 34.3 35.3
Approach LOS C C D
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.4 15.0 62.4 22.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 73.4 11.0 58.4 18.6
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.0 12.3 53.7 4.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.6 0.0 3.9 0.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.4
HCM 6th LOS C
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2282 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
3: Morton Rd & Project Driveway 02/12/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 60 0 4 20 0 7
Future Vol, veh/h 60 0 4 20 0 7
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 65 0 4 22 0 8
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 23 15 0 0 26 0
Stage 1 15 -----
Stage 2 8 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 998 1070 - - 1601 -
Stage 1 1013 -----
Stage 2 1020 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 998 1070 - - 1601 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 998 -----
Stage 1 1013 -----
Stage 2 1020 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 998 1601 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.065 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2283 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
4: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd N. 02/12/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 36 5 0 90
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 36 5 0 90
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 86 86 86 86 86 86
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 3 1 42 6 0 105
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 150 45 0 0 48 0
Stage 1 45 -----
Stage 2 105 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 847 1031 - - 1572 -
Stage 1 983 -----
Stage 2 924 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 847 1031 - - 1572 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 847 -----
Stage 1 983 -----
Stage 2 924 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.1 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 887 1572 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.1 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2284 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
5: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd S. 02/12/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 56 0 42 12 1 88
Future Vol, veh/h 56 0 42 12 1 88
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 59 0 44 13 1 93
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 146 51 0 0 57 0
Stage 1 51 -----
Stage 2 95 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 851 1023 - - 1560 -
Stage 1 977 -----
Stage 2 934 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 850 1023 - - 1560 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 850 -----
Stage 1 977 -----
Stage 2 933 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0 0.1

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 850 1560 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.069 0.001 -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.6 7.3 0
HCM Lane LOS - - A A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2285 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Box Springs Rd & Morton Rd 02/12/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 47 376 1408 22 70 125
Future Volume (veh/h) 47 376 1408 22 70 125
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 52 413 1547 24 77 137
Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91
Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000
Cap, veh/h 97 2635 2316 36 344 392
Arrive On Green 0.05 0.73 0.64 0.64 0.19 0.19
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3705 3733 56 1810 1610
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 52 413 767 804 77 137
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1805 1890 1810 1610
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 3.5 26.8 26.9 3.6 7.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 3.5 26.8 26.9 3.6 7.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 97 2635 1149 1203 344 392
V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.16 0.67 0.67 0.22 0.35
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 127 2635 1149 1203 344 392
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.1 4.1 11.5 11.5 34.3 31.3
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.6 0.1 3.1 3.0 1.5 2.4
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.4 1.1 10.6 11.1 1.7 6.9
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.7 4.2 14.6 14.5 35.8 33.7
LnGrp LOS D A B B D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 465 1571 214
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.4 14.5 34.5
Approach LOS A B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 77.0 23.0 9.3 67.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 73.0 19.0 7.0 62.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 9.0 4.8 28.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.1 0.4 0.0 15.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.4
HCM 6th LOS B
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2286 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Sycamore Canyon Blvd & Fair Isle Dr 02/11/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 81 104 227 185 232 119 313 575 322 421 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 81 104 227 185 232 119 313 575 322 421 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 84 108 236 193 242 124 326 599 335 439 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 44 441 394 312 1417 632 155 1043 465 408 558 42 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.29 0.66 0.66 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1745 131 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 84 108 236 193 242 124 326 599 335 0 472 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1876 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 3.3 4.9 10.7 1.8 6.2 6.1 6.4 16.4 8.4 0.0 20.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 3.3 4.9 10.7 1.8 6.2 6.1 6.4 16.4 8.4 0.0 20.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 44 441 394 312 1417 632 155 1043 465 408 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.19 0.27 0.76 0.14 0.38 0.80 0.31 1.29 0.82 0.00 0.79 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 141 441 394 312 1417 632 181 1043 465 429 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.2 26.9 27.5 30.3 9.7 10.5 40.4 25.0 12.8 38.8 0.0 27.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.5 1.0 1.7 8.9 0.2 1.5 19.3 0.8 144.9 11.5 0.0 10.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.5 2.0 4.8 0.7 2.1 3.5 2.8 24.2 4.2 0.0 10.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.7 27.9 29.3 39.2 9.9 12.0 59.7 25.8 157.7 50.4 0.0 37.9 LnGrp LOS DCCDABECFDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 671 1049 807
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.0 21.0 105.1 43.1
Approach LOS C C F D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.5 26.0 11.7 32.8 6.2 39.3 14.5 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 22.0 9.0 28.0 7.0 30.0 11.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.7 6.9 8.1 22.6 2.7 8.2 10.4 18.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.0 0.1 2.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 60.5
HCM 6th LOS E
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2287 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
2: I-215 NB Ramps & Fair Isle Dr/Box Springs Rd 02/11/2021 Project Completion With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 453 893 0 0 302 379 103 2 33 0 0 0 Future Volume (veh/h) 453 893 0 0 302 379 103 2 33 0 0 0 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 00000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 482 950 0 0 382 362 74 53 35
Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 00000000
Cap, veh/h 858 2487 0 0 760 644 402 237 157
Arrive On Green 0.24 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.22 0.22 0.22 Sat Flow, veh/h 3510 3705 0 0 1900 1610 1810 1068 705
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 482 950 0 0 382 362 74 0 88
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln1755 1805 0 0 1900 1610 1810 0 1773 Q Serve(g_s), s 10.8 10.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 15.7 3.0 0.0 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.8 10.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 15.7 3.0 0.0 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.40
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 858 2487 0 0 760 644 402 0 394
V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.56 0.18 0.00 0.22 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 858 2487 0 0 760 644 402 0 394
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 29.8 5.9 0.0 0.0 20.3 20.9 28.4 0.0 28.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 2.4 3.5 1.0 0.0 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln4.5 3.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 6.3 1.4 0.0 1.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 30.4 6.2 0.0 0.0 22.6 24.4 29.4 0.0 30.0 LnGrp LOS C A A A C C C A C
Approach Vol, veh/h 1432 744 162
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.4 23.5 29.7
Approach LOS B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 66.0 26.0 40.0 24.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 62.0 22.0 36.0 20.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.0 12.8 17.7 5.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.7 1.3 3.5 0.5
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.3
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2288 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
3: Morton Rd & Project Driveway 02/11/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.9
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 0 9 67 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 40 0 9 67 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 43 0 10 73 0 5
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 52 47 0 0 83 0
Stage 1 47 -----
Stage 2 5 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 962 1028 - - 1527 -
Stage 1 981 -----
Stage 2 1023 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 962 1028 - - 1527 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 962 -----
Stage 1 981 -----
Stage 2 1023 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.9 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 962 1527 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.045 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2289 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
4: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd N. 02/11/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.2
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 2 104 14 0 64
Future Vol, veh/h 2 2 104 14 0 64
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 3 3 139 19 0 85
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 234 149 0 0 158 0
Stage 1 149 -----
Stage 2 85 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 759 903 - - 1434 -
Stage 1 884 -----
Stage 2 943 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 759 903 - - 1434 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 759 -----
Stage 1 884 -----
Stage 2 943 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.4 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 825 1434 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.006 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2290 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th TWSC
5: Morton Rd & Wordsworth Rd S. 02/11/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 40 1 103 43 0 71
Future Vol, veh/h 40 1 103 43 0 71
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -----
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0
Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0
Peak Hour Factor 89 89 89 89 89 89
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 00000
Mvmt Flow 45 1 116 48 0 80
Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 220 140 0 0 164 0
Stage 1 140 -----
Stage 2 80 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.2 - - 4.1 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 -----
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.4 -----
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 3.3 - - 2.2 -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 773 913 - - 1427 -
Stage 1 892 -----
Stage 2 948 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 773 913 - - 1427 -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 773 -----
Stage 1 892 -----
Stage 2 948 -----
Approach WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.9 0 0

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT
Capacity (veh/h) - - 776 1427 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.059 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS - - A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.2 0 -
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2291 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: Box Springs Rd & Morton Rd 02/11/2021
Project Completion With Project Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 135 792 610 58 63 71
Future Volume (veh/h) 135 792 610 58 63 71
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 141 825 635 60 66 74
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96
Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000
Cap, veh/h 177 2447 1786 169 422 533
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.68 0.54 0.54 0.23 0.23
Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 3705 3429 315 1810 1610
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 141 825 343 352 66 74
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1805 1843 1810 1610
Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 8.6 9.8 9.8 2.6 2.9
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.9 8.6 9.8 9.8 2.6 2.9
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 177 2447 967 988 422 533
V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.34 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.14
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 322 2447 967 988 422 533
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 39.7 6.1 12.0 12.0 27.5 21.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.0 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.5
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.4 2.9 4.0 4.1 1.2 3.2
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.8 6.4 13.0 13.0 28.2 21.7
LnGrp LOS D A B B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 966 695 140
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.5 13.0 24.8
Approach LOS B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 65.0 25.0 12.8 52.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 61.0 21.0 16.0 41.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.6 4.9 8.9 11.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 7.1 0.3 0.2 4.7
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.6
HCM 6th LOS B
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2292 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2293 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Sycamore Canyon Blvd & Fair Isle Dr 02/12/2021
Project Completion With Project With Imp. Conditions - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 29 60 73 433 157 890 81 533 312 62 112 3 Future Volume (veh/h) 29 60 73 433 157 890 81 533 312 62 112 3 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 33 68 83 492 178 1011 92 606 355 70 127 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 76 437 390 625 1969 878 117 679 859 227 348 8 Arrive On Green 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.35 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.19 0.19 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1848 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 68 83 492 178 1011 92 606 355 70 0 130 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1892 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 3.0 4.1 24.4 2.4 37.2 5.0 16.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 6.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 3.0 4.1 24.4 2.4 37.2 5.0 16.4 0.0 1.9 0.0 6.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 76 437 390 625 1969 878 117 679 859 227 0 356 V/C Ratio(X) 0.43 0.16 0.21 0.79 0.09 1.15 0.79 0.89 0.41 0.31 0.00 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 127 437 390 625 1969 878 127 679 859 246 0 356 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.7 29.9 30.3 29.4 10.9 10.6 46.1 39.6 14.0 44.6 0.0 35.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 0.8 1.2 2.4 0.0 73.1 25.5 16.5 1.5 0.8 0.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 1.4 1.7 10.7 0.9 28.9 3.1 8.7 4.9 0.8 0.0 3.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 50.6 30.6 31.5 31.8 10.9 83.6 71.6 56.1 15.4 45.4 0.0 38.3 LnGrp LOS DCCCBFEEBDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 184 1681 1053 200
Approach Delay, s/veh 34.6 60.8 43.7 40.8
Approach LOS C E D D
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 38.5 28.2 10.5 22.8 8.2 58.5 10.5 22.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 34.0 24.2 7.0 18.8 7.0 51.2 7.0 18.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 26.4 6.1 7.0 8.0 3.8 39.2 3.9 18.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.2 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 52.2
HCM 6th LOS D
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2294 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
1: Sycamore Canyon Blvd & Fair Isle Dr 02/12/2021
Project Completion With Project With Impr Conditions - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 81 104 227 185 232 119 313 575 322 421 32 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 81 104 227 185 232 119 313 575 322 421 32 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 84 108 236 193 242 124 326 599 335 439 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 000000000000
Cap, veh/h 44 441 394 312 1417 632 155 1043 743 408 558 42 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.29 0.66 0.66 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1810 1805 1610 1810 3610 1610 1810 3610 1610 3510 1745 131 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 84 108 236 193 242 124 326 599 335 0 472 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1810 1805 1610 1755 0 1876 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 3.3 4.9 10.7 1.8 6.2 6.1 6.4 8.6 8.4 0.0 20.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 3.3 4.9 10.7 1.8 6.2 6.1 6.4 8.6 8.4 0.0 20.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.07
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 44 441 394 312 1417 632 155 1043 743 408 0 600 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.19 0.27 0.76 0.14 0.38 0.80 0.31 0.81 0.82 0.00 0.79 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 141 441 394 312 1417 632 181 1043 743 429 0 600 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 1.67 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.2 26.9 27.5 30.3 9.7 10.5 40.4 25.0 7.8 38.8 0.0 27.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.5 1.0 1.7 8.9 0.2 1.5 19.3 0.8 9.1 11.5 0.0 10.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.5 2.0 4.8 0.7 2.1 3.5 2.8 6.0 4.2 0.0 10.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 47.7 27.9 29.3 39.2 9.9 12.0 59.7 25.8 17.0 50.4 0.0 37.9 LnGrp LOS DCCDABECBDAD
Approach Vol, veh/h 207 671 1049 807
Approach Delay, s/veh 30.0 21.0 24.8 43.1
Approach LOS CCCD
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.5 26.0 11.7 32.8 6.2 39.3 14.5 30.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.0 22.0 9.0 28.0 7.0 30.0 11.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.7 6.9 8.1 22.6 2.7 8.2 10.4 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.9 0.0 1.4 0.0 2.0 0.1 4.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.6
HCM 6th LOS C
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2295 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Appendix L
Fire Hazard Analysis and Approach Memorandum
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2296 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
To: Douglas Bloom, Fire Marshal, Moreno Valley Fire Department From: Dudek Fire Protection Planning Team, Michael Huff, Director Subject: Gateway Heights Project Fire Hazard Analysis and Approach Date: 03/31/2022
cc: Jason Ackerman, Esq., Ackerman Law
Attachment(s): Figures 1-2
Attachment 1 – Site Aerial Photograph
Attachment 2 – Fuel Modification Plan
Attachment 3 -- Site Plan with Revised Dual Project Access This Technical Fire Protection Memorandum documents fire protection planning related to project constraints analysis for the subject project. The approach outlined herein responds to your recommended direction during our recent communications regarding emergency ingress/egress to/from the project site and access to defensible space areas.

Project description
The proposed Gateway Heights development is a 108 unit detached townhouse project on an approximately 33- acre site in the City of Moreno Valley.
• “Detached townhouses” (townhouses by CBC definition are attached; structures are likely to be considered SFDs per code)
• Structures are separated 10’ apart.
• Structures are two-story townhouses
• Proposed 16-acre open space lot north of the developed project site Existing Site Observations
Onsite
• Attachment 1 provides a site aerial photograph.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2297 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 2
NOVEMBER 2022
• Vegetation is primarily scattered sage scrub, forbs, and scattered native shrubs and a few ornamental trees in the northeast corner;
• Unmaintained roads/trails traverse the property;
• Evidence of recent fuel reduction activities are present on site.

Topography
The project site is relatively flat, with a slight upslope gradient to the north; beyond the project to the north is a steep, rocky hillside with sparse scrub and forb vegetation. To the west and south the terrain has gently rolling hills with intermittent drainages. Along the eastern edge of the property is a drainage channel strewn with boulders. To the east of the project is a residential subdivision.

Vicinity
The project is located in the northeast area of the City of Moreno Valley. The western and northern property lines coincide with the city limits; the lands immediately to the west and north of the property are within unincorporated Riverside County.
• North: open space;
• East of northern open space lot: open space;
• Southeast of project site: residential development;
• West: open space.

Proposed site plan review / code compliance issues
Issues to address:
• Driveway lengths: proposed lengths range from 136 to 273 feet with 24’ width. The driveways for Pads 1, 3, 4, 6 and 8 are less than 150 feet long and would thereby qualify as fire apparatus access roads. The driveways for Pads 2, 5, 7 and 9 through 13 are greater than 150 feet long and would not qualify as fire apparatus access roads since no turnarounds are proposed. • Fuel modification width: 100-foot FMZ can be provided for most units (Attachment 2). The western most units on Pad 13 (NW corner) are 30 feet from the property line; the units on Pad 7 are 69 feet from the property line; obtaining an off-site FMZ easement would be one approach to resolving this potential issue.

However, if an off-site FMZ easement is not feasible due to an unwilling neighboring property owner; then onsite “hardening” features may be required as an alternative method of fire protection (i.e., firewalls on the property line).

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2298 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 3
NOVEMBER 2022
Primary access
Primary access is proposed using Morton Road on the southern side of the project, which has access to Box Springs Road and the SR60/I-215 Freeway.

Secondary access
In reviewing the Moreno Valley Fire Code, there is no reference identified whereby a secondary access is required for the project. CFC 503.1.2 authorizes the fire code official to require more than one access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road, but it does not require that an additional access road must be provided.

The project design provides two 36’ foot wide roadways at the entrance to minimize any potential traffic congestion during an emergency setting; one for ingress and one for egress (see Attachment 3). Each entrance roadway connects to separate “legs” of the internal circulation loop road allowing for approximately half of the occupants to exit in each of two distinct directions without conflict.

Internal circulation
• Loop road system;
• Direct access is provided to all structures;
• Unobstructed internal circulation loop roadway width of 24 feet; • No dead-end fire apparatus access roads.

Fuel modification and Vegetation Management
A fuel modification landscape plan has been prepared and submitted for review and approval.

The two “legs” of the internal circulation loop road, along the eastern and western edges of the project, will be located between the property line and structures providing a paved, non-combustible, defensible space as part of the fuel modification zone.

The project will also comply with the following requirements related to fuel modification and vegetation management outlined in the 2022 California Fire Code. The Project-provided fuel modification landscape plan provides additional details on the Project’s consistency with these requirements and has been submitted for review to Moreno Valley Fire Department.
4906.1 General
Planting of vegetation for new landscaping shall be selected to reduce non-fire-resistant vegetation in proximity to a structure and to maintain vegetation as it matures.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2299 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 4
NOVEMBER 2022
4906.2 Application
All new plantings of vegetation in State Responsibility Areas (SRA) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone shall comply with Sections 4906.3 through 4906.5.3. 4906.3 Landscape Plans
Landscape plans shall be provided when required by the enforcing agency. The landscape plan shall include development and maintenance requirements for the vegetation management zone adjacent to structures and roadways, and to provide significant fire hazard reduction benefits for public and firefighting safety. 4906.3.1 Contents
Landscape plans shall contain the following:

1. Delineation of the 30-foot (9144 mm) and 100-foot (30.5 m) fuel management zones from all structures.

2. Identification of existing vegetation to remain and proposed new vegetation.

3. Identification of irrigated areas.

4. A plant legend with both botanical and common names, and identification of all plant material symbols.

5. Identification of ground coverings within the 30-foot (9144 mm) zone. 4906.4 Vegetation
All new vegetation shall be fire-resistant vegetation in accordance with this section.

Exception: Trees classified as non-fire-resistant vegetation complying with Section 4906.4.2.1.

To be considered fire-resistant vegetation, it must meet at least one of the following:

1. Be identified as fire-resistant vegetation in an approved book, journal or listing from an approved organization.

2. Be identified as fire-resistant vegetation by a licensed landscape architect with supporting justification.

3. Plants considered fire-resistant vegetation and approved by the local enforcing agency. 4906.4.1 Shrubs
All new plantings of shrubs shall comply with the following:

1. Shrubs shall not exceed 6 feet (1829 mm) in height.

2. Groupings of shrubs are limited to a maximum aggregate diameter of 10 feet (3048 mm).

3. Shrub groupings shall be separated from other groupings a minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm).

4. Shrub groupings shall be separated from structures a minimum of 30 feet (9144 mm).

5. Where shrubs are located below or within a tree's drip line, the lowest tree branch shall be a minimum of three times the height of the understory shrubs or 10 feet (3048 mm), whichever is greater. 4906.4.2 Trees
Trees shall be managed as follows within the 30-foot (9144 mm) zone of a structure:

1. New trees shall be planted and maintained so that the tree's drip line at maturity is a minimum of 10 feet (3048 mm) from any combustible structure.

2. The horizontal distance between crowns of new trees and crowns of adjacent trees shall not be less than 10 feet (3048 mm).

3. Existing trees shall be trimmed to provide a minimum separation of 10 feet (3048 mm) away from chimney and stovepipe outlets per Title 14, Section 1299.03.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2300 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 5
NOVEMBER 2022
4906.4.2.1 Non-Fire-Resistant Vegetation
New trees not classified as fire-resistant vegetation, such as conifers, palms, pepper trees and eucalyptus species, shall be permitted provided the tree is planted and maintained so that the tree's drip line at maturity is a minimum 30 feet (9144 mm) from any combustible structure.

Defensible Space
The project will comply with the following defensible space requirements outlined in the 2022 California Fire Code. 4907.1 General
Hazardous vegetation and fuels shall be managed to reduce the severity of potential exterior wildfire exposure to buildings and to reduce the risk of fire spreading to buildings as required by applicable laws and regulations.

Defensible space will be managed around all buildings and structures in State Responsibility Areas (SRA) as required in Public Resources Code 4291.
4907.2 Application
Buildings and structures located in the following areas shall maintain the required hazardous vegetation and fuel management:

1. All unincorporated lands designated by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection as a State Responsibility Area (SRA).

2. Land designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone by the Director.

3. Land designated in ordinance by local agencies as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone pursuant to Government Code Section 51179.
4907.3 Requirements
Hazardous vegetation and fuels around all buildings and structures shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations:

1. Public Resources Code, Section 4291.

2. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 1.5, Chapter 7, Subchapter 3, Article 3, Section 1299.03.

3. California Government Code, Section 51182.

4. California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 7, Subchapter 1, Section 3.07.

Relevant code sections:

California Residential Code R337. Materials and Construction Methods for Exterior Wildfire Exposure: minimum standards for a new building located in a WUI area to resist the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2301 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 6
NOVEMBER 2022
California Fire Code 503.1.2 Additional access. Authorizes the fire code official to require more than one access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road, but it does not require that an additional access road must be provided.

Moreno Valley Fire Code Amendments
• 503.2.1 Fire apparatus access roads – 24 feet wide
• 903.2 Single Family Dwellings shall have automatic fire sprinkler systems • 4906.4 Fuel Modification Requirements for New Construction. Must meet the criteria established by Riverside County Fire Department (Information Bulletin #08-05). Submit a Fuel Modification Plan; indicate setback, irrigated and thinning zones (30’ Green Zone; 100’ total defensible space). • App B. Fire Flow and Hydrant Spacing
Fire environment assessment
The project site’s fire environment assessment was performed by Dudek fire protection planners with extensive similar experience throughout California over the last 25 years. • The site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. • No evidence of recent fire on site; fire history data indicates the site has had multiple fires within a fivemile radius and the site itself has burned four times since 1980. • Vegetation on site and to the north, west and south is sparse and low growing, which would reduce the impacts from a wildland fire;
• Adjacent hillslopes to the north exist up and away from the project site. This reduces wildfire risks at the project site as wildfire is more likely to spread at slower rates when moving downslope compared to an upslope direction.
• The project may be subject to an approaching wildland fire from the northeast during Santa Ana wind conditions. While direct impacts from wildfire cannot be completely ruled out, structural ignition risks from ember cast are minimal given modern construction requirements in alignment with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, per California Office of the State Fire Marshals Office data.

Fire Behavior assessment
• Selected fuel models Sh1 (low load, dry climate shrub) and Sh2 (moderate load, dry climate shrub) to represent the existing vegetative fuels. Site photographs provided in Attachment 4 depicts the fuels present on and adjacent to the project site.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2302 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 7
NOVEMBER 2022
• Selected wildland fire run scenarios from the NE and SW representing an offshore Santa Ana wind event and an onshore wind event. Santa Ana wind events represent “worst-case” conditions and represent the highest wind speeds and lowest fuel moistures likely to occur at the project site. • Conducted fire behavior modeling using the BehavePlus 6 modeling system for existing conditions and post-development fuel modification (see results in Table 1). The location of model runs is provided in Figure

1. Table 1. Fire Behavior Modeling Results
Fire Scenarios
Flame
Length
(feet)
Fireline Intensity
(BTU/feet/second)
Spread
Rate
(mph)
Spotting
Distance
(miles)
Scenario 1: 15% slope, 40 mph NE wind
Fuel Model Sh1 (scrub/mustard) 8.4 584 1.0 0.7
Fuel Model Sh2 (scrub/mustard) 14.1 1,781 0.8 0.9
Scenario 1 Fuel Mod: 10% slope, 40 mph NE wind
Fuel Model 8 (irrigated landscaping) 2.6 46 0.1 0.3
Scenario 2: 15% slope, 20 mph SW wind
Fuel Model Sh1 (scrub/mustard) 8.5 589 1.0 0.7
Fuel Model Sh2 (scrub/mustard) 14.1 1,796 0.8 0.9
Scenario 2 Fuel Mod: 15% slope, 20 mph SW wind
Fuel Model 8 (irrigated landscaping) 2.6 46 0.1 0.3
• An additional assessment was conducted to determine fire behavior during a Santa Ana wind event (worstcase weather conditions) in areas adjacent to the project site using the FlamMap software package. Direct impacts from wildfire are not likely at the project site due to flame lengths less than 20 feet in adjacent lands and the planned Fuel Modification Zones.

The following paragraphs provide descriptions of the inputs used in processing the FlamMap model. In addition, data sources are cited, and any assumptions made during the modeling process are described. A graphical representation of the model results is provided in Figure 2 F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2303 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 8
NOVEMBER 2022
Elevation
The elevation data file represents units of meters above mean sea level (AMSL). Elevations in the FlamMap analysis area range from 1,585 to 2,625 feet AMSL. Elevation data is a required input file for FlamMap runs and are necessary for adiabatic adjustment of temperature and humidity and for conversion of fire spread between horizontal and slope distances.

Slope
The slope data file represents values in degrees of inclination from horizontal. Slope values in the FlamMap analysis area range from 0–32 degrees. The slope input file is necessary for computing slope effects on fire spread and solar radiance.

Aspect
The aspect data file represents values in azimuth degrees. Aspect values are important in determining the solar exposure of grid cells.

Wind and Fuel Moisture
Wind speed and fuel moisture values for the FlamMap analysis utilized the same values as those used in the BehavePlus runs for Santa Ana weather scenarios. Fuel moisture data was collected from local RAWS stations. Wind alignment was set at 70 degrees, and wind speed was set to 40 mph.

Fuel Model
The fuel model data file was based on the 40 Scott and Burgan (2005) models and represents distinct distributions of fuel loading found among surface fuel components (live and dead), size classes, and fuel types.

Recommendations / AM&M Justification
The Project includes the need for alternative materials and methods for FMZ and dead-end road length. This Fire Protection Technical Report proposes the following approach (AM&Ms) and justification. The AM&M’s are evaluated to provide at least equivalent protection based on the experience of the preparers of this report.

1. Site fire environment and fire behavior is not significant. The vegetation on site and on adjacent lands is sparse – dried mustard and scattered sage. The ridge behind the project site slopes up and away from project, is covered with sparse light vegetation and rocks, which is beneficial.

2. Structures must be constructed in accordance with CRC R337 building codes (within FHSZ) and will include features such as ember resistant vents (baffled not just mesh).

3. FMZ will be provided around entire perimeter of the project site (see Fuel Modification Plan – Attachment 2). (Where the FMZ and Jurisdictional Delineation area overlaps along the upper portion of the F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2304 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 9
NOVEMBER 2022
southeastern property line, active fuel treatment will be conducted so as to avoid impacts. The channel is comprised of large boulders with limited vegetation and in its existing state acts as a fuel modification area.) The Project will be hardened throughout.
a. The Project shall attempt to obtain an interim off-site FMZ easement for Pads 7 and 13 so that a total of 100 feet of FMZ from the Project’s structures can be achieved. The off-site FMZ would be limited to thinning/mowing of existing vegetation annually. Should the off-site easement be infeasible based on an unwilling neighbor, then alternative fire protection is proposed:
i. Wherever less than 100 feet of FMZ (on and off site combined) is achievable, a 6 foot tall, masonry wall will be constructed at the property line in lieu of the additional FMZ.

Wall Justification: When buildings are set back from slopes, and a wall is placed at the property line, flames and radiant heat are deflected vertically reducing the effects of heat on the structure. If a structure cannot be setback adequately, or where the slope is less than 30%, a noncombustible wall can help deflect the flames from the structure (NFPA 2005). The duration of radiant heat impact on the exposed side of the house is also reduced. The structure setback is important to avoid heat and/or flame intersection with the structure.

Heat-deflecting landscape walls of masonry construction that are six feet in height will be incorporated at the edge of lots where FMZs are the most constrained (Pads 7 and 13). The landscape walls provide a vertical, non-combustible surface in the line of heat, fumes, and flame. Once these fire byproducts intersect the wall, they are deflected upward or, in the case where lighter fuels are encountered, they are quickly consumed, heat and flame are absorbed or deflected by the wall, and the fuels burn peaks out within a short (30 second– 2 minute) time frame (Quarles and Beall 2002). Walls like these have been observed to deflect heat and airborne embers on numerous wildfires in San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, and Santa Barbara County.

Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District, Laguna Beach Fire Department, Orange County Fire Authority, Murieta Fire Protection District, and others utilize these walls as alternative methods based on observed performance during wildfires. This has led to these agencies approving use of non-combustible landscape walls as mitigations for reduced fuel modification zones and reduced setbacks at top of slope. While fuel moistures vary slightly across these jurisdictions, Santa Ana wind events create similar fuel moistures across a broad geographical area due to intensive drying of fuels. Therefore, this mitigation is also justified within the Moreno Valley Fire Protection District. These walls are consistent with NFPA 1144 Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fire – 2008 Edition, Section 5.1.3.3 and A.5.1.3.3 and International Urban Wildland Interface Code (ICC 2012). NFPA 1144, A.5.1.3.3 states: “Noncombustible walls and barriers are effective for deflecting radiant heat and windblown embers from structures.” These walls and barriers are usually constructed of noncombustible materials (concrete block, bricks, stone, stucco) or earth where 30 feet (9 meters) of defensible space is not available.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2305 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 10 NOVEMBER 2022

4. Provide FMZ inspections annually. Inspections will be performed by RCFD or, at their preference, the Project would fund inspections by a 3rd party to their satisfaction. This measure will ensure that the FMZ is functioning as intended.

5. Identify and mark fire lane and/or no parking areas as required.

6. Provide enlarged turns at both internal loop roadway turns.

7. Dual pane (both panes) tempered glass for openings on exposed sides of the structures on Pads 7 and 13.

8. Loop internal road system with two 36-foot wide, multi-lane, physically-separated ingress/egress roadways.

9. Hardening at Project access point via pavement and landscaping.

10. Fire access points at the terminus of each driveway along the north side of Project for firefighting.

Additionally, the area behind the northeast side of the project includes a 10-to-12-foot flat area that will be available to pedestrian firefighters via the provided accesses at the end of each driveway in that area.

Summary
The structures will be constructed following CRC R337 requirements to ensure reduced ignition potential. In addition, hardening of the structures including enhanced vents and enhanced glazing requirements will be included on selected units as noted above.

The internal circulation provides the necessary access to all structures with no dead-end fire apparatus access roads that require fire department turnarounds. The minimum roadway width of 36 feet meets the requirements for buildings less than 30 feet in height. Hydrants will need to be installed within the project site.

The primary access off Morton Road has been enhanced to include two 36’ wide physically separated roadways for ingress and egress to reduce traffic congestion during emergencies, by providing dedicated ingress and egress routes.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2306 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 11 NOVEMBER 2022
Figures 1-2
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2307 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Document Path: Z:\Projects\j1408800\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\FPP\FIG 4 BehavePlusAnalysisMap.mxd 0 250 500 1,000
Feet

SOURCE: AERIAL- BING MAPPING SERVICE; DEVELOPMENT- EDWIN SAMLIN 2021 Project Boundary
SCENARIO RUN #2
SCENARIO RUN #3
SCENARIO RUN #1
SCENARIO RUN #4
FIGURE 1
BehavePlus Analysis Map
Fire Protection Plan for the Gateway Heights Project
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2308 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 60 60
215
215

Date: 10/19/2021 - Last saved by: lterry - Path: Z:\Projects\j1408800\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\FPP\FIG 1 Project Location.mxd Project Boundary
Banning
Beaumont
Brea
Calimesa
Canyon Lake
Carlsbad
Cathedral City
Claremont
Colton
Corona
Dana Point
Del Mar
Desert
Hot Springs
Eastvale
Encinitas
Escondido
Fontana Grand Terrace
Hemet
Highland
Indian Wells
Irvine
Jurupa Valley
Laguna Niguel
Laguna Woods
Lake
Elsinore Menifee
Monrovia
Moreno
Valley
Murrieta Newport Beach
Norco
Oceanside
Ontario
Orange Palm Desert
Palm
Springs
Perris
Poway
Rancho
Mirage
Rancho
Santa Margarita
Rialto
San Bernardino
San Clemente
San Dimas
San Jacinto
San Marcos
Santee
Solana
Beach
Temecula
Villa Park
Vista
Wildomar
Yucaipa
Yucca Valley S a n
B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y L o s A n g e l e s
C o u n t y
S a n D i e g o
C o u n t y
71 57
60 74
91 55
73 241
39 206 330
72 56
22 90
111
67 243
66 60
38 74
76 79
78 5
605
10 215
15 210
405
Project Site
0 375 750
Feet
Fire Protection Plan for the Gateway Heights Project
FIGURE 2
Flame Lengths
(Santa Ana Wind Event)
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2309 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 12 NOVEMBER 2022
Attachment 1
Site Aerial Photograph
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2310 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Aerial view of Project site. Land cover on site is disturbed, grassland, with minimal shrubs. Slopes to the north/northeast are sparsely vegetated with heavy rock outcrop ground cover. East/southeast includes large property single family homes. Land to the west is vacant and planned for development. Morton Road is directly to the west/southwest.

F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2311 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 13 NOVEMBER 2022
Attachment 2
Fuel Modification Plan
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2312 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Date: 12/16/2021 - Last saved by: lterry - Path: Z:\Projects\j1408800\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\FPP\Appendix E Fuel Mod Plan.mxd

MORTON ROAD

JENNINGS
COURT
3 0
'
69'
9 6
'
Proposed Project Fuel Modification Plan
Fire Protection Plan for the Gateway Heights Project
SOURCE: AERIAL- RIVERSIDE COUNTY 2019 0 100 200Feet
Project Boundary
30-Ft FMZ
100-Ft FMZ
Fire Access Points

FMZ DIMS
Land Use

P-BUILDING ENVELOP

P-DEVELOPMENT

P-ROADWAY

P-DRIVEWAY
P-PARK

P-SLOPES

P-BASIN

P-BENCH

P-STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
Attachment 2
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2313 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 14 NOVEMBER 2022
Attachment 3
Revised Site Plan Including Two Separate Ingress/Egress Roads F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2314 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040
APN: 256-150-039
APN: 256-150-038
APN: 256-150-037 APN: 256-040-012 (GATEWAY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN) APN: 256-160-017 APN: 256-160-002 (VACANT) APN: 256-040-009
APN: 256-030-012
(VACANT) CITY OF MORENO VALLEY COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

MORTON ROAD

JENNING COURT

HILLMER COURT
BASIN
A
BASIN
B

OPEN SPACE

16.1 ACRES

PARK / OPEN SPACE

2.3 ACRES

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C
12,852SF PAD 1
PAD 2
12,852SF 12,852SF PAD 3
PAD 4
12,852SF
PAD 5
16,254SF
PAD 6
12,852SF
PAD 7
7,674SF
PAD 8
12,852SF
PAD 9
16,254SF
PAD 10
16,254SF
PAD 11
16,254SF
PAD 12
12,852SF
PAD 13
15,132SF
8885 Haven Avenue
Suite 195
united engineering group
Phone: 909.466.9240
CA 91730
Rancho Cucamonga,
www.unitedeng.com
IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

SITE PLAN
BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA., INC NOVEMBER 2021

UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA, INC
OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER

SHIZAO ZHENG
SHEET INDEX:

GENERAL NOTES:

SURROUNDING LAND USE

SITE DATA
UTILITY PURVEYORS:

LEGEND

SITE LOCATION

VICINITY MAP
215
215
60 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

SITE PLAN

GATEWAY HEIGHTS

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT

PROJECT LAND USE
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2315 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 15 NOVEMBER 2022
Attachment 4
Site Photographs
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2316 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Photograph 1: Photograph taken from Morton Road looking northeast at the project site showing on and offsite fuels and adjacent hillslopes that exists up and away from the project site. Rock outcroppings covering the hillslope reduce wildfire hazard by taking away burnable fuels.

Photograph 2: Photograph taken from the western edge of the project site looking east. On-site fuels are low load and comprised of short shrubs and annual grasses.

ATTACHMENT 4 - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
14088
NOVEMBER 2022 16
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2317 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

APPENDIX A / PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph 3: Photograph taken from the northern boundary of the project site looking west picturing adjacent shrub and grass fuels and electrical transmission line. Spacing between vegetation decreases wildfire spread.

Photograph 4: Photograph taken from northeastern boundary of project site showing shrub and grass fuels in addition to adjacent trees and rock outcroppings. Fuel loads are highest along the project site’s northern boundary.
14088
NOVEMBER 2022 17
F.1.d
Packet Pg. 2318 Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040 APN: 256-150-039 APN: 256-150-038
APN: 256-150-037
APN: 256-040-012
(GATEWAY CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN)
APN: 256-160-017
APN: 256-160-002
(VACANT)
APN: 256-040-009 (VACANT) APN: 256-030-012 (VACANT) STREET A STREET B STREET C High Fire Zone - 01 0-30' from structure · Fully irrigated landscape areas. · Trees to be trimmed 10' clear of structures. · Regular maintenance to remove dry and dead material. · Create separation between plantings and items that could catch fire. High Fire Zone - 02 30-100' from structure · Cut and mow annual grasses down to maximum height of 4". · Create horizontal spacing between trees. · Create vertical spacing between grasses. · Remove fallen leaves needles and branches. Hydroseeded slopes Native grasses and wildflowers for slope stabilization. Areas to be maintained routinely for fire control. OPEN SPACE 15.4 ACRES 30'-0" 70'-0" Property Line Property Line Property Line Property Line Single Family residential - existing structure natural vegetation natural vegetation Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure CITY OF MORENO VALLEY COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

JENNINGS COURT
MORTON ROAD w w w . i w o o d a r c h i t e c t u r e . c o m 0 120 feet 1" = 60' 60 180 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\02\22070_WA-fire protection plan.dwg07.11.2022bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 11.07.2022 Scale: 1" = 60' WOOD ARCHITECTURE PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 32.8 acres. Plants to be chosen from County of Riverside California Friendly Plant List and approved by the Fire Department. Zone 0 - Ember Resistant Zone Zone 0 extends 5 feet from buildings, structures, decks, etc. The ember-resistant zone is currently not required by law, but science has proven it to be the most important of all defensible space zones. This zone includes the area under and around all attached decks, and requires the most stringent wildfire fuel reduction. The ember-resistant zone is designed to keep fire or embers from igniting materials that can spread the fire to your home. The following provides guidance for this zone, which may change based on the regulation developed by the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. · Use hardscape like gravel, pavers, concrete and other noncombustible mulch materials. No combustible bark or mulch. · Remove all dead and dying weeds, grass, plants, shrubs, trees, branches and vegetative debris (leaves, needles, cones, bark, etc.); Check your roofs, gutters, decks, porches, stairways, etc. · Remove all branches within 10 feet of any chimney or stovepipe outlet. · Limit plants in this area to low growing, non-woody, properly maintained plants. · Limit combustible items (outdoor furniture, planters, etc.) on top of decks. · Relocate firewood and lumber to Zone 2. · Replace combustible fencing, gates, and arbors attached to the home with noncombustible alternatives. · Consider relocating garbage and recycling containers outside this zone. · Consider relocating boats, RVs, vehicles and other combustible items outside this zone. Zone 1 - Lean, Clean and Green Zone Zone 1 extends 30 feet from buildings, structures, decks, etc. or to your property line, whichever is closer. · Remove all dead plants, grass and weeds (vegetation). · Remove dead or dry leaves and pine needles from yard, roof and rain gutters. · Remove branches that hang over your roof and keep dead branches 10 feet away from your chimney. · Trim trees regularly to keep branches a minimum of 10 feet away from your chimney. · Relocate firewood and lumber to Zone 2. · Remove or prune flammable plants and shrubs near windows. · Remove vegetation and items that could catch fire from around and under decks, balconies and stairs. · Create a separation between trees, shrubs and items that could catch fire, such as patio furniture, wood piles, swing sets, etc. *During times of drought when green landscaping cannot be achieved due to water restrictions be sure to remove all dead or dying material from Zone 1. Zone 2 - Reduce Fuel Zone Zone 2 extends from 30 feet to 100 feet out from buildings, structures, decks, etc. or to your property line, whichever is closer. · Cut or mow annual grass down to a maximum height of 4 inches. · Create horizontal space between shrubs and trees (See diagram). · Create vertical space between grass, shrubs, and trees. (See diagram). · Remove fallen leaves, needles, twigs, bark, cones, and small branches. However, they may be permitted to a depth of 3 inches. · All exposed wood piles must have a minimum of 10 feet of clearance, down to bare mineral soil, in all directions. F.1.d Packet Pg. 2319
Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040 APN: 256-150-039 APN: 256-150-038
APN: 256-150-037
APN: 256-040-012
(GATEWAY CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN)

STREET A

STREET B
STREET C High Fire Zone - 01 0-30' from structure · Fully irrigated landscape areas. · Trees to be trimmed 10' clear of structures. · Regular maintenance to remove dry and dead material. · Create separation between plantings and items that could catch fire. High Fire Zone - 02 30-100' from structure · Cut and mow annual grasses down to maximum height of 4". · Create horizontal spacing between trees. · Create vertical spacing between grasses. · Remove fallen leaves needles and branches. Hydroseeded slopes Native grasses and wildflowers for slope stabilization. Areas to be maintained routinely for fire control. OPEN SPACE 15.4 ACRES 30'-0" 70'-0" natural vegetation natural vegetation Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

JENNINGS COURT
MORTON ROAD NOTE: This info
subject to adjust Client and Gove or guarantees ar Irrigated Area NOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject to adjustments pending further verification and Client and Governmental Agency approval. No warranties or guarantees are given or implied by the Architect. w w w . i w o o d a r c h i t e c t u r e . c o m 0 120 feet 1" = 60' 60 180 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\02\22070_WA-fire protection plan_plants.dwg07.11.2022bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 11.07.2022 Scale: 1" = 60' WOOD ARCHITECTURE PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 32.8 acres. Plants to be chosen from County of Riverside California Friendly Plant List and approved by the Fire Department. F.1.d Packet Pg. 2320
Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-
STREET B High Fire Zone-02 High Fire Zone-01 30'-100' from structure 0'-30' from structure Native non irrigated hydroseed mix Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation NOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject to adjustments pending further verification and Client and Governmental Agency approval. No warranties or guarantees are given or implied by the Architect. TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE USE WUCOLS STYLE CA NATIVE Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard No Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Multi-trunk 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Lagerstroemia indica x fauriei 'Natchez' Natchez Crape Myrtle 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Medium Standard No Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Low Standard Yes Quercus wislizeni Interior Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Rhus lancea African Sumac 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Sample Plant Palette Sample Plant Palette SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE WUCOLS CA NATIVE Acacia redolens 'Desert Carpet' Desert Carpet Bank Catclaw 5 gal Evergreen Low No Agave species Agave 5 gal Evergreen Low No Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Point' Pigeon Point Coyote Brush 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Ceanothus griseus horizontalis Carmel Creeper 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Ceanothus maritimus 'Valley Violet' Valley Violet Maritime Ceanothus 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Cistus x pulverulentus 'Sunset' Sunset Rockrose 5 gal Evergreen Low No Dasylirion wheeleri Grey Desert Spoon 5 gal Evergreen Low No Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 5 gal Evergreen Low No Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Kniphofia uvaria 'Shining Sceptre' Shining Sceptre Red Hot Poker 5 gal Evergreen Low No Mimulus aurantiacus Sticky Monkeyflower 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Myoporum parvifolium Trailing Myoporum 5 gal Evergreen Low No Penstemon parryi Parry's Beardtongue 1 gal Evergreen Low No Rhamnus californica California Coffeeberry 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus' Dwarf Rosemary 5 gal Evergreen Low No Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia leucantha Mexican Bush Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low No Salvia leucophylla Purple Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Zauschneria californica California Fuchsia 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Z Z Z  L Z R R G a U F K L t e F t X U e  F R m 0 60 feet 1" = 30' 30 90 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\02\22070_WA-planting_30.dwg07.11.2022bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 11.07.2022 Scale: 1" = 30' :22' $5&+,7(&785( PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN MATCH-LINE F.1.d Packet Pg. 2321
Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-1
APN: 256-150-040
APN: 256-040-012 (GATEWAY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN) STREET A STREET C PARK Turf Area Native non irrigated hydroseed mix High Fire Zone-01 0'-30' from structure High Fire Zone-02 30'-100' from structure Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Native non irrigated hydroseed mix High Fire Zone-01 0'-30' from structure High Fire Zone-02 30'-100' from structure TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE USE WUCOLS STYLE CA NATIVE Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard No Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Multi-trunk 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Lagerstroemia indica x fauriei 'Natchez' Natchez Crape Myrtle 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Medium Standard No Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Low Standard Yes Quercus wislizeni Interior Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Rhus lancea African Sumac 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Sample Plant Palette Sample Plant Palette SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE WUCOLS CA NATIVE Acacia redolens 'Desert Carpet' Desert Carpet Bank Catclaw 5 gal Evergreen Low No Agave species Agave 5 gal Evergreen Low No Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Point' Pigeon Point Coyote Brush 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Ceanothus griseus horizontalis Carmel Creeper 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Ceanothus maritimus 'Valley Violet' Valley Violet Maritime Ceanothus 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Cistus x pulverulentus 'Sunset' Sunset Rockrose 5 gal Evergreen Low No Dasylirion wheeleri Grey Desert Spoon 5 gal Evergreen Low No Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 5 gal Evergreen Low No Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Kniphofia uvaria 'Shining Sceptre' Shining Sceptre Red Hot Poker 5 gal Evergreen Low No Mimulus aurantiacus Sticky Monkeyflower 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Myoporum parvifolium Trailing Myoporum 5 gal Evergreen Low No Penstemon parryi Parry's Beardtongue 1 gal Evergreen Low No Rhamnus californica California Coffeeberry 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus' Dwarf Rosemary 5 gal Evergreen Low No Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia leucantha Mexican Bush Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low No Salvia leucophylla Purple Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Zauschneria californica California Fuchsia 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Z Z Z  L Z R R G a U F K L t e F t X U e  F R m 0 60 feet 1" = 30' 30 90 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\02\22070_WA-planting_30.dwg07.11.2022bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 11.07.2022 Scale: 1" = 30' :22' $5&+,7(&785( PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN MATCH-LINE F.1.d Packet Pg. 2322
Attachment: Appendicies H-L (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Exhibit B
Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration/Newspaper Notice F.1.e
Packet Pg. 2323 Attachment: Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT A

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Moreno Valley is considering a recommendation that the project herein identified will have no significant environmental impact in compliance with Section 15070 of the CEQA guidelines. A copy of the MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION and the ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST, which supports the proposed findings, are on file at the City of Moreno Valley.

Project: General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095)
Change of Zone (PEN20-0096);
Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (PEN21-0066), and Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)
Applicant: HengHou Group
Owner: Shizao Zheng
Representative: Jason Ackerman
Location: East side of Morton Road approximately 300 feet north of Jennings Court. (APN: 256-150-001) Proposal: To allow construction of a 108-unit detached townhouse Planned Unit Development with private streets, a 0.89-acre community park, and common area improvements on a 16.59-acre portion of 32.56 acres of vacant land.

Council District: 2
This Notice of Intent (NOI) has been prepared to notify agencies and interested parties that the City of Moreno Valley, as the Lead Agency, has prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with construction and operation of the project as described below.

Project Description: The Project consists of the following entitlements: General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095) from “R2 Residential” and “Hillside Residential” to “R10 Residential” and “Open Space”; Change of Zone (PEN20-0096) from Residential 2 (R2) District and Hillside Residential (HR) District to Residential 10 (R10) District and Open Space (OS) District; Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) to establish flexible standards using the Planned Unit Development regulations for a new 108-unit detached townhouse condominium development with a 0.89-acre community park; Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 will subdivide the 32.56 gross acres of vacant land into a 16.59-acre common-area lot with 108 air space parcels for condominium purposes and a public park and a 15.97-acre remainder open-space lot.

The Project site is not included on any list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.

Document Availability: The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all documents incorporated and/or referenced therein, can be reviewed during normal business hours (7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday and Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.) at the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division counter, located at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, CA 92553. The documents may also be reviewed on the City’s website at http://www.morenovalley.ca.us/cdd/documents/about-projects.html.

Potential Environmental Impacts: The City of Moreno Valley has prepared an Initial Study to determine the environmental effects associated with the above actions and finds the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate level of environmental review. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration concludes that all potentially significant impacts of the Project would be mitigated to a less than significant level.

Comment Deadline: Pursuant to Section 15105(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has established a 30-day public review period for the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, which begins March 2, 2023 and ends March 31, 2023. Written comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration must be received at the City of Moreno Valley Community Development Department by no later than the conclusion of the 30-day review period, 5:30 p.m. on March 31, 2023. Written comments on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration should be addressed to:

Luis Lopez, Contract Planner
14177 Frederick Street
Post Office Box 88005
Moreno Valley, California 92552
Phone: (951) 413-3206
Email: [email protected]
F.1.e
Packet Pg. 2324 Attachment: Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract Press
-Enterprise March 2, 2023
Sean P. Kelleher Newspaper Date of Publication
Planning Official
Community Development Department
F.1.e
Packet Pg. 2325 Attachment: Exhibit B to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract Exhibit C
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2326 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
Aesthetics
RR AES-1: The Developer shall
prepare a Lighting Plan that provides
the type and location of proposed
exterior lighting and signage, subject
to the review and approval of the
City’s Development Services
Department. All new lighting shall be
shielded and down-cast, such that the
light is not cast onto adjacent
properties or visible from above. Night
lighting shall be directed away from
the MSHCP Conservation Area to
protect species within the MSHCP
Conservation Area from direct and
indirect night lighting. Prior to approval
of the Final Design, an analysis of
potential impacts from light and glare
from interior and exterior building
lighting, safety and security lighting,
and vehicular traffic accessing the site
shall be submitted to the City for
review and approval. This analysis
shall demonstrate that due to shielded
and directional lighting in compliance
with Mt. Palomar lighting standards,
no lighting shall be introduced into the
adjacent Conservation Area. If
potential lighting impacts are
identified, the lighting design
(placement, light spectrum, and
shielding), or other design solutions
acceptable to the City of Moreno
Valley shall be implemented to
eliminate lighting impacts on the
adjacent Conservation Areas.

Shielding, including Turtle Bay type
LED lighting, shall be incorporated
into Project designs to ensure ambient
lighting in the MSHCP Conservation
Area is not increased. The Lighting
Plan shall include monitoring during
construction and post-project to
demonstrate lighting levels do not
increase in the Conservation Area. If
light standards are exceeded, the
Project Applicant is responsible for
immediate implementation of remedial
actions to reduce light levels to
acceptable levels identified in the
Lighting Plan.

Prior to
commencing
ground- or
vegetation
disturbing
activities
Project Proponent
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2327 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
Biological Resources
RR BIO-1: The Developer shall obtain
a tree removal permit from the City, if
fuel modification, grading, or other
improvements require removal of any
heritage trees. The Developer would
incorporate mitigation trees, replacing
removed heritage trees, resulting from
a tree removal permit into the
Project’s final landscape plan.

Prior to
Construction
City’s Development Services
Department
MM BIO-1: To maintain compliance
with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
(MBTA and California Fish and Game
Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and
3513, site preparation activities
(ground disturbance, construction
activities, staging equipment, and/or
vegetation removal activities for the
project shall be avoided, to the
greatest extent possible, during the
nesting bird season. If ground
disturbing and/or vegetation clearance
activities are scheduled to occur
during the avian nesting season, a
pre- construction nesting bird survey
shall be conducted by a qualified
biologist within the Project Site and a
500-foot buffer around the Project
Site. Surveys shall be conducted
within 3 days prior to initiation of
activity and shall be conducted
between dawn and noon. The survey
results shall be provided to the City’s
Planning Department. The Project
Applicant shall adhere to the
following:

1. Applicant shall designate a biologist
(Designated Biologist) experienced in:
identifying local and migratory bird
species of special concern;
conducting bird surveys using
appropriate survey methodology;
nesting surveying techniques,
recognizing breeding and nesting
behaviors, locating nests and
breeding territories, and identifying
nesting stages and nest success;
determining/establishing appropriate
avoidance and minimization
measures; and monitoring the efficacy
of implemented avoidance and
minimization measures.

Prior to
commencing
ground- or
vegetation
disturbing
activities
Project Proponent
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2328 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials

2. Pre-activity field surveys shall be
conducted at the appropriate time of
day/night, during appropriate weather
conditions, no more than 3 days prior
to the initiation of Project activities.

Surveys shall encompass all suitable
areas including trees, shrubs, bare
ground, burrows, cavities, and
structures. Survey duration shall take
into consideration the size of the
Project site; density, and complexity of
the habitat; number of survey
participants; survey techniques
employed; and shall be sufficient to
ensure the data collected is complete
and accurate.

If nesting birds are not found within
the project site, site preparation and
construction activities may begin
during the nesting/breeding season. If
nesting birds (including nesting
raptors are detected, then avoidance
or minimization measures shall be
undertaken in consultation with the
City of Moreno Valley and California
Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Measures shall include immediate
establishment of an avoidance buffers
shall be implemented as determined
by a qualified biologist and approved
by the City of Moreno Valley, based
on their best professional judgement
and experience. The buffer shall be of
a distance to ensure avoidance of
adverse effects to the nesting bird by
accounting for topography, ambient
conditions, species, nest location, and
activity type. The buffer around the
nest shall be delineated and flagged,
and no construction activity shall
occur within the buffer area until a
qualified biologist determines nesting
species have fledged and the nest is
no longer active or the nest has failed.

The biologist shall monitor the nest at
the onset of project activities, and at
the onset of any changes in such
project activities (e.g., increase in
number or type of equipment, change
in equipment usage, etc.) to
determine the efficacy of the buffer. If
the biologist determines that such
project activities may be causing an
adverse reaction, the biologist shall
adjust the buffer accordingly or
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2329 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
4 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
implement alternative avoidance and
minimization measures, such as
redirecting or rescheduling
construction or erecting sound
barriers. All work within these buffers
will be halted until the nesting effort is
finished (i.e., the juveniles are
surviving independent from the nest).

All nests shall be monitored as
determined by the qualified biologist
until nestlings have fledged and
dispersed or it is otherwise confirmed
that the nest has been unsuccessful
or abandoned. Work can resume
within these avoidance areas when no
other active nests are found. Upon
completion of the survey and nesting
bird monitoring, a report shall be
prepared and submitted to City of
Moreno Valley Planning Division for
mitigation monitoring compliance
record keeping.

MM BIO-2: To avoid project-related
impacts to burrowing owls potentially
occurring on or in the vicinity of the
project site, the Developer shall have
a qualified biologist conduct a projectspecific habitat assessments and preconstruction survey for burrowing owl in accordance with the March 2006
Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for
the Western Riverside County Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan
Area. This survey shall occur within
30 days prior to ground-disturbance
activities (e.g., vegetation clearing,
clearing, and grubbing, tree removal,
site watering) within those portions of
the project site containing suitable
burrowing owl habitat. If ground
disturbing activities in these areas are
delayed or suspended for more than
30 days after the pre- construction
survey, the area shall be resurveyed
for owls. The results of the survey
should be submitted to the City and
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife within three days of survey
completion. In addition, a
preconstruction survey for burrowing
owl shall be conducted within 3 days
prior to initiation of Project activities
and reported to CDFW as described
above.

Prior to
commencing
ground- or
vegetation
disturbing
activities
Project Proponent
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2330 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
If no burrowing owls are observed
during the survey, site preparation
and construction activities may begin.

If burrowing owl are present within the
survey area, then avoidance or
minimization measures shall be
undertaken in consultation with the
City of Moreno Valley, California
Department of Fish and Wildlife
(CDFW) and US Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS). CDFW shall be
sent written notification within 48
hours of detection of burrowing owls.

If active nests are identified on the
Project site, the Project applicant shall
not commence activities until it can be
determined that the burrows are not
being used by adult or juvenile owls or
following CDFW approval of a
Burrowing Owl Plan as described
below. If owl presence is difficult to
determine, a qualified biologist shall
monitor the burrows with motionactivated trail cameras for at least 24 hours to evaluate burrow occupancy.

The onsite qualified biologist will verify
the nesting effort has finished
according to methods identified in the
Burrowing Owl Plan.

The qualified biologist and Project
Applicant shall coordinate with the
City, CDFW, and USFWS to develop
a Burrowing Owl Plan to be approved
by the City, CDFW, and USFWS prior
to commencing Project activities. The
Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe
proposed avoidance, relocation,
monitoring, minimization, and/or
mitigation actions. The Burrowing Owl
Plan shall include the number and
location of occupied burrow sites and
details on proposed buffers if avoiding
the burrowing owls or information on
the adjacent or nearby suitable habitat
available to owls for relocation. If no
suitable habitat is available nearby for
relocation, details regarding the
habitat characteristics of the proposed
relocation site, creation and funding of
artificial burrows (numbers, location,
and type of burrows) and
management activities for relocated
owls shall also be included in the
Burrowing Owl Plan. The City shall
implement the Burrowing Owl Plan
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2331 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
6 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
following CDFW and USFWS review
and approval.

If burrowing owls are observed within
Project Site(s) during Project
implementation and construction, the
Project applicant shall notify CDFW
immediately in writing within 72 hours
of detection. A Burrowing Owl Plan
shall be submitted to CDFW for
review and approval within two weeks
of detection and no Project activity
shall continue within 1000 feet of the
burrowing owls until CDFW approves
the Burrowing Owl Plan. The City
shall be responsible for implementing
appropriate avoidance and mitigation
measures, including burrow
avoidance, passive or active
relocation, or other appropriate
mitigation measures as identified in
the Burrowing Owl Plan.

A final report shall be prepared by the
qualified biologist documenting the
results of the burrowing owl surveys
and detailing avoidance, minimization,
and mitigation measures. The final
report shall be submitted to the City
and CDFW within 30 days of
completion of the survey and
burrowing monitoring for mitigation
monitoring compliance record
keeping.

MM BIO-3: For all features identified
as jurisdictional that cannot be
avoided, the Developer shall obtain
permits from the respective agencies
prior to the initiation of construction
activities. These permits include a
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404
permit from the USACE, a CWA
Section 401 water quality certification
from the Regional Water Quality
Control Board, and a CDFW Section
1602 Notification of Lake or
Streambed Alteration.

The Developer shall implement and
comply with all measures required by
the jurisdictional permits. Mitigation for
the loss of jurisdictional resources
shall be negotiated with the resource
agencies (US Army Corps of
Engineers, Regional Water Quality
Control Board, and California
Prior to
Construction
Developer/Respective
Agencies
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2332 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
7 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
Department of Fish and Wildlife)
during the regulatory permitting
process.

MM BIO-4: To ensure long-term
conservation of avoided
riparian/riverine resources the Project
Applicant will record a deed
restriction, conservation easement, or
other appropriate mechanisms over
avoided riparian/riverine resources on
the Project Site. The recorded realty
instrument shall be provided to the
City prior to grading.

The Applicant proposes to
compensate for impacts to MSHCP
riparian/riverine areas by providing a
1:1 ratio of reestablishment or a 2:1
ratio of rehabilitation credits at
Riverpark Mitigation Bank. If credits at
Riverpark Mitigation Bank are not
available prior to grading, the
Developer shall compensate for
impacts to jurisdictional waters and
riparian/riverine areas by providing a
31:1 ratio of offsite land within the
Santa Ana Watershed to be acquired
for the purpose of In-Perpetuity
Preservation, or through the purchase
of mitigation credits at an established
off-site Mitigation Bank in Western
Riverside County. Mitigation proposed
on land acquired for the purpose of inperpetuity mitigation that is not part of an agency-approved mitigation bank
or in-lieu fee program shall include the
preservation, creation, restoration,
and/or enhancement of similar habitat
within the Santa Ana Watershed
pursuant to a Habitat Mitigation and
Monitoring Plan (HMMP) to be
approved by the Lead and
Responsible agencies. The HMMP
shall be prepared prior to any impacts,
and it shall provide details as to the
implementation of mitigation,
maintenance, future monitoring, and
management. The goal of the
mitigation shall be to preserve, create,
restore, and/or enhance similar
habitat with equal or greater function
and value than the affected habitat.

Prior to
commencing
ground- or
vegetation
disturbing
activities
Project Proponent
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2333 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
8 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
MM BIO-5: The Developer shall pay
the applicable MSHCP Development
Mitigation Fee prior to initiation of
grading activities.

Prior to Initiation of
Grading Activities
Developer
MM BIO-6: The following avoidance
and minimization measures shall be
implemented during Project
construction activities:
 Construction limits along the
northern and eastern
boundaries of the Project
shall be clearly marked so
that adjacent native
vegetation is avoided.
 Staging and storage areas
for spoils, equipment,
materials, fuels, lubricants,
and solvents shall be located
within the designated impact
area or adjacent developed
areas.
 A Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan shall be
developed and implemented.
 Invasives: Invasive species
identified in Table 6-2 of the
MSHCP shall not be used in
development landscape
plans or restoration plan
activities.
 Construction-related and
long-term Project operation
noise shall not exceed 65
dBA Leq in the adjacent
MSHCP Criteria Cell. Prior to
issuance of land
development permits,
including clearing or
grubbing and grading and/or
construction permits for
areas within or adjacent to
the MSHCP Criteria Cell, the
applicant shall prepare and
submit to the satisfaction of
the City, an acoustical
analysis to demonstrate that
the 65 dBA Leq noise level is
not exceeded in the Criteria
Cell. The acoustical analysis
shall describe the methods
by which construction noise
shall not exceed 65 dBA Leq
Ongoing During
Construction
Developer/Qualified Biologist
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2334 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
9 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
and how noise levels will be
monitored during
construction and for the life
of the project. Noise
abatement methods may
include, but are not limited
to, reoperation of specific
construction activities,
installation of noise
abatement at the source,
and/or installation of noise
abatement at the receiving
areas.
 Noise Plan: Prior to approval
of the Final Design, a Noise
plan shall be submitted to the
City of Moreno Valley for
review and approval. The
Noise Plan shall identify
noise generating land uses
that may affecting the
MSHCP Conservation Area
and shall incorporate
setbacks, berms or walls to
minimize the effects of noise
on MSHCP Conservation
Area resources pursuant to
applicable rules, regulations
and guidelines related to
land use noise standards.

The MSHCP identifies that
Project noise impacts do not
exceed the residential
standards within the
Conservation Areas. For
planning purposes, wildlife
within the MSHCP
Conservation Area should
not be subject to noise that
would exceed residential
noise standards. The Noise
Plan shall include monitoring
during construction and postproject to demonstrate noise levels in the Conservation
Area do not exceed
residential standards. If noise
standards are exceeded, the
Project Applicant is
responsible for immediate
implementation of remedial
actions to reduce noise
levels to acceptable levels.

F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2335 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
10 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
 Landscaping Plan: develop a
landscaping plan that
includes the use of native
plant material on the Project
site and avoids the use of
invasive plant species
identified in Table 6-2 of the
MSHCP for landscaping
portions of development that
are adjacent to the MSHCP
Conservation Area including
avoided riparian/riverine
resources. Prior to approval
of the Final Design, a
landscaping plan, using
native vegetation, for areas
adjacent to the Conservation
Area shall be submitted to
the City for review and
approval.
 Barrier and Fencing Plan: A
Barrier and Fencing plan that
provides specific details
designed to minimize
unauthorized public access,
domestic animal predation,
illegal trespass, and dumping
in the MSHCP Conservation
Area. Prior to approval of the
Final Design, a fencing plan
shall be submitted to the City
of Moreno Valley and the
Western Riverside County
Regional Conservation
Authority for review and
approval. The fencing plan
shall include 8-foot tall
fencing made of secure and
fire-proof materials (such as
brick, stone, or metal) placed
along the entire boundary
adjacent to Conservation
Area to prohibit movement of
people and pets from the
development area into the
Conservation Area. The top
of all walls and fences shall
be designed to prevent
animals from entering
Conservation Areas using
systems such as a roller
bars, angled fence tops, or
other effective fence designs
to keep out pets, especially
cats. To prevent bird strikes
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2336 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
11 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
and reduce bird mortality, no
section of the fence should
include clear panels or be
made of transparent
materials such as glass or
plastic. The Fencing Plan
shall identify a maintenance
and monitoring plan for the
fence, including who is
responsible for fence
maintenance with sufficient
funding to maintain the
barrier.
 Grading/Land Development
– Manufactured slopes
associated with proposed
site development shall not
extend into the MSHCP
Conservation Area.
 Best Management Practices:

The MND should incorporate
the guidance in MSHCP
Section 7.0 and Appendix C
of the MSHCP for addressing
Best Management Practices.

MM BIO-7: The Developer shall pay
the applicable Stephens’ Kangaroo
Rat Habitat Conservation Plan
Development Mitigation Fee prior to
initiating any grading activities.

Prior to
Construction
Developer
Cultural Resources
RR CUL-1: In the event of the
discovery of human remains, the
developer shall contact the County
coroner immediately. If human
remains of Native American origin are
discovered during ground disturbing
activities, the developer shall comply
with the State laws relating to the
disposition of Native American burials
that fall within the jurisdiction of the
Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC; PRC §5097).

According to the California Health and
Safety Code, six or more human
burials at one location constitute a
cemetery (Section 8100), and
disturbance of Native American
cemeteries is a felony (Section 7052).

Section 7050.5 requires that
excavation is stopped near discovered
human remains until the coroner can
Ongoing During
Construction
Contractor/Qualified
Professional Archaeologist
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2337 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
12 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
determine whether the remains are
those of a Native American. If the
remains are determined to be Native
American, the California Native
American Heritage Commission shall
be notified, and appropriate measures
provided by State law shall be
implemented to determine the most
likely living descendant(s). Disposition
of the remains shall be overseen by
the most likely living descendants to
determine the most appropriate
means of treating the human remains
and any associated grave artifacts.

MM CUL-1: Prior to the issuance of a
demolition permit, the Developer shall
submit the name and qualifications of
a qualified archaeologist to the City of
Moreno Valley Community
Development Department for review
and approval. Once approved, the
qualified archaeologist shall be
retained by the Developer. In the
event that suspected cultural
(archaeological) resources or tribal
cultural resources are inadvertently
unearthed during excavation activities,
the contractor shall immediately cease
all earth-disturbing activities within a
100-foot radius of the area of
discovery. The Project contractor or
Developer shall contact the qualified
archaeologist to request an evaluation
of the significance of the find and
determine an appropriate course of
action. If avoidance of the resource(s)
is not feasible, salvage operation
requirements pursuant to Section
15064.5 of the State California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
shall be followed in consultation with
the City. After the find has been
appropriately avoided or mitigated,
work in the area may resume.

Prior to the
Issuance of a
Grading Permit
Developer/Contractor/Qualified
Professional Archeologist
MM CUL-2: Archaeological monitoring
will be conducted by a qualified
archaeologist for all ground
disturbance activities that occur within
30 meters (100 feet) of Sites 33-
015937 and 33 015938, which are
identified in greater detail within the
Project’s cultural reports (Appendix
C). If any suspected cultural
(archaeological) resources are
Ongoing During
Construction
Developer/Contractor/
Qualified Professional
Archeologist
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2338 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
13 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
detected, the procedures identified in
MM CUL-1 will be implemented.

Energy
RR ENE-1: The Project must be
designed in accordance with the
applicable Title 24 Energy Efficiency
Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings (California
Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 24,
Part 6). These standards are updated,
nominally every three years, to
incorporate improved energy
efficiency technologies and methods.

Prior to
Construction
Developer
RR ENE-2: The Project is subject to
the California Green Building
Standards Code (CALGreen) (CCR,
Title 24, Part 11). These standards
are updated, nominally every three
years, to incorporate improved energy
efficiency technologies and methods.

Prior to
Construction
Developer
RR ENE-3: The Project shall comply
with applicable policies of the Moreno
Valley Climate Action Plan by
complying with meeting the following
policies:

1. Require new multi-family
residential development to reduce
the need for external trips by
providing useful services/facilities
on-site such as electric vehicle
infrastructure. (Policy TR-9)

2. incentives such as streamlined
permitting or bonus density for
new multi-family buildings and
reroofing projects to install “cool”
roofs consistent with the current
California Green Building Code
(CALGreen) standards for
commercial and industrial
buildings. (Policy R-1)

3. Require new construction and
major remodels to install interior
real-time energy smart meters in
line with current utility provider
(e.g. MVU, SCE) efforts. (Policy
R-2)

4. Reduce emissions from heavyduty construction equipment by limiting idling based on South
Coast Air Quality Management
Prior to
Construction
Developer
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2339 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
14 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
District (SCAQMD) requirements
and utilizing cleaner fuels,
equipment, and vehicles.
a. Require provision of clear
signage reminding
construction workers to limit
idling.
b. Require the Developer to
limit GHG emissions through
one or more of the following
measures:
i. substitute electrified or
hybrid equipment for
diesel/gas powered
equipment.
ii. Use alternative fueled
equipment on site.
iii. Avoid use of on-site
generators. (Policy
OR-2).

Geology and Soils
MM GEO-1 : Prior to approval of final
plans and specifications for the
Project, the City shall review the
Project plans to confirm that all
recommendations in the Geotechnical
Report (prepared by LGC GeoEnvironmental, Inc in 2018), the Slope Stability Report (prepared by Dynamic
Geotechnical Solutions in 2021), and
any future geotechnical reports have
been fully and appropriately
incorporated into all grading and
construction drawings.

Prior to Approval
of Final Plans
Developer/City’s Development
Services Department
MM GEO-2: Prior to the issuance of a
grading permit, the Developer shall
submit the name and qualifications of
a qualified paleontologist to the City of
Moreno Valley Community
Development Department for review
and approval. Once approved, the
qualified paleontologist shall be
retained by the Developer on an oncall basis to observe grading activities in the Young Alluvial Valley Deposits
and Old Alluvial Fan Deposits on the
Project Site and to salvage and
catalogue fossils as necessary. At the
Project’s Pre-Grade Meeting, the
paleontologist shall discuss the
sensitivity of the sediment being
Prior to the
Issuance of a
Grading Permit
Developer/ City’s Development
Services Department/Qualified
Paleontologist
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2340 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
15 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
graded and shall establish procedures
for monitoring. Protocols must be
developed and explained for
temporarily halting or redirecting work
to permit sampling, identification, and
evaluation of any fossils discovered. If
the fossils are deemed significant, the
paleontologist shall determine
appropriate actions, in cooperation
with the City of Moreno Valley, to
recover and treat the fossils and to
prepare them to the point of
identification. A final Paleontological
Resources Monitoring Report shall
include a catalogue and analysis of
the fossils found; a summary of their
significance; and the repository that
would curate the fossils in perpetuity.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
PDF HAZ-1: The Project’s proposed
basins would be designed and
maintained to provide for a maximum
48-hour detention period following the
design storm, and to remain totally dry
between rainfalls.

During Project
Design
Developer/City’s Development
Services Department
PDF HAZ-2: Vegetation in and around
the basins that would provide food or
cover for birds would be incompatible
with airport operations and shall not
be utilized in Project landscaping.

Trees shall be spaced so as to
prevent large expanses of contiguous
canopy, when mature. Landscaping in
and around the basins shall not
include trees or shrubs that produce
seeds, fruits, or berries. Landscaping
in the basins, if not rip rap, would be
in accordance with the guidance
provided in ALUC “Landscaping Near
Airports” brochure, and the “Airports,
Wildlife, and Stormwater
Management” brochure available at
RCALUC.org which lists acceptable
plants from the Riverside County
Landscaping Guide or other
alternative landscaping as may be
recommended by a qualified wildlife
hazard biologist.

During Project
Design
Developer/City’s Development
Services Department
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2341 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
16 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
PDF HAZ-3: A notice shall be
permanently affixed to the fencing
surrounding the basins with the
language similar to the following:
“There is an airport nearby. This
stormwater basin is designed to hold
stormwater for only 48 hours and to
not attract birds. Proper maintenance
is necessary to avoid bird strikes.”
This sign would also include the
name, telephone number, or other
contact information of the person or
entity responsible for monitoring and
maintain the basins.

During Project
Operation
Developer/City’s Development
Services Department
PDF HAZ-4: Prior to close of escrow
on the Project’s future proposed
homesites, the “Notice of Airport in
Vicinity” that was attached to the
ALUC’s 2020 Airport Land Use
Commission (ALUC) Development
Review – Director’s Determination
letter shall be provided to all
prospective purchasers and
occupants of the Project.

During Project
Operation
Developer/City’s Development
Services Department
Public Resources
RR PUB-1: The Developer shall
comply with all applicable codes,
ordinances, and regulations, including
the most current edition of the
California Fire Code and the City of
Moreno Valley Municipal Code,
regarding fire prevention and
suppression measures; fire hydrants;
fire access; water availability; and
other, similar requirements. Prior to
issuance of building permits, the City
of Moreno Valley Community
Development Department and the
Moreno Valley Fire Department shall
verify compliance with applicable
codes and that appropriate fire safety
measures are included in the Project
design. All such codes and measures
shall be implemented prior to
occupancy.

During Project
Construction
Developer/Contractor/ City’s
Development Services
Department/Moreno Valley Fire
Department
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2342 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
17 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
RR PUB-2: The Developer shall pay
all applicable Development Impact
Fees (DIFs) prior to the issuance of
building permits, for parkland
dedication, parkland improvements,
public safety facilities, other
governmental facilities, and outside
agency fees including school district
fees.

Prior to Issuance
of a Building
Permit
Developer/City’s Development
Services Department
Tribal Cultural Resources
MM TCR-1: Archaeological
Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a
grading permit, the Developer shall
retain a professional archaeologist,
who meets the U.S. Secretary of the
Interior Standards, to conduct
monitoring of all mass grading and
trenching activities.

The Project Archaeologist, in
consultation with the Consulting
Tribe(s) including Pechanga Band of
Luiseño Indians, the contractor, and
the City, shall develop a CRMP as
defined in MM TCR-3. The Project
archeologist shall attend the pregrading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any
contractors and will conduct a
mandatory Cultural Resources Worker
Sensitivity Training to those in
attendance. The archaeological
monitor shall have the authority to
temporarily halt and redirect earth
moving activities in the affected area
in the event that suspected
archaeological resources are
unearthed.

Prior to Issuance
of a Grading
Permit
Developer/Qualified
Professional Archeologist
MM TCR-2: Native American
Monitoring. Prior to the issuance of a
grading permit, the Developer shall
secure agreements with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians for
tribal monitoring. The City is also
required to provide a minimum of 30
days’ advance notice to the tribes of
all mass grading and trenching
activities. The Native American Tribal
Representatives shall have the
authority to temporarily halt and
redirect earth moving activities in the
affected area in the event that
suspected archaeological resources
are unearthed. The Native American
Prior to Issuance
of a Grading
permit
Developer/Qualified
Professional Archeologist/City’s
Development Services
Department
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2343 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
18 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
Monitor(s) shall attend the pre-grading
meeting with the Project
Archaeologist, City, the construction
manager and any contractors and will
conduct the Tribal Perspective of the
mandatory Cultural Resources Worker
Sensitivity Training to those in
attendance.

MM TCR-3A: In the event that Native
American cultural resources are
discovered during the course of
grading (inadvertent discoveries), the
following procedures shall be carried
out for final disposition of the
discoveries:
a. One or more of the following
treatments, in order of
preference, shall be employed
with the tribes. Evidence of such
shall be provided to the City of
Moreno Valley Planning
Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the
cultural resources, if feasible.

Preservation in place means
avoiding the resources,
leaving them in the place
they were found with no
development affecting the
integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the
discovered items as detailed
in the treatment plan
required pursuant to MM
CUL-1. This shall include
measures and provisions to
protect the future reburial
area from any future impacts
in perpetuity. Reburial shall
not occur until all legally
required cataloging and
basic recordation have been
completed. No recordation of
sacred items is permitted
without the written consent of
all Consulting Native
American Tribal
Governments as defined in
MM CUL-1. The location for
the future reburial area shall
be identified on a confidential
exhibit on file with the City,
and concurred to by the
Developer/Qualified
Professional
Archeologist/Contractor
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2344 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
Consulting Native American
Tribal Governments prior to
certification of the
environmental document.

MM TCR-3B: Cultural Resource
Monitoring Plan (CRMP). The Project
Archaeologist, in consultation with the
Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor,
and the City, shall develop a CRMP in
to address the details, timing and
responsibility of all archaeological and
cultural activities that will occur on the
Project Site. A consulting Tribe is
defined as a Tribe that initiated the AB
52 tribal consultation process for the
Project, has not opted out of the AB52
consultation process, and has
completed AB 52 consultation with the
City as provided for in Cal Pub Res
Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of
AB52. Details in the Plan shall
include:
a Project description and location;
b Project grading and development
scheduling;
c Roles and responsibilities of
individuals on the Project;
d The pre-grading meeting and
Cultural Resources Worker
Sensitivity Training details;
e The protocols and stipulations
that the contractor, City,
Consulting Tribe(s) and Project
archaeologist will follow in the
event of inadvertent cultural
resources discoveries, including
any newly discovered cultural
resource deposits that shall be
subject to a cultural resources
evaluation.
f The type of recordation needed
for inadvertent finds and the
stipulations of recordation of
sacred items.
g Contact information of relevant
individuals for the Project.

Prior to
Construction
Developer/Qualified
Professional Archeologist/City’s
Development Services
Department/Contractor
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2345 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
20 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
MM TCR 4: The City shall verify that
the following note is included on the
Grading Plan:
“If any suspected archaeological
resources are discovered during
ground disturbing activities and the
Project Archaeologist or Native
American Tribal Representatives are
not present, the construction
supervisor is obligated to halt work in
a 100-foot radius around the find and
call the Project Archaeologist and the
Tribal Representatives to the site to
assess the significance of the find."
Prior to
Construction
City’s Development Services
Department
MM TCR 5: Inadvertent Finds. If
potential historic or cultural resources
are uncovered during excavation or
construction activities at the Project
Site that were not assessed by the
archaeological report(s) and/or
environmental assessment conducted
prior to Project approval, all ground
disturbing activities in the affected
area within 100 feet of the uncovered
resource must cease immediately and
a qualified person meeting the
Secretary of the Interior's standards
(36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives,
and all site monitors per the Mitigation
Measures, shall be consulted by the
City to evaluate the find, and as
appropriate recommend alternative
measures to avoid, minimize or
mitigate negative effects on the
historic, or prehistoric resource.

Further ground disturbance shall not
resume within the area of the
discovery until an agreement has
been reached by all parties as to the
appropriate mitigation. Work shall be
allowed to continue outside of the
buffer area and will be monitored by
additional archeologist and Tribal
Monitors, if needed. Determinations
and recommendations by the
consultant shall be immediately
submitted to the Planning Division for
consideration, and implemented as
deemed appropriate by the
Community Development Director, in
consultation with the State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any
and all Consulting Native American
Tribes as defined in MM TCR-2 before
Ongoing During
Construction
Developer/Qualified
Professional Archeologist/City’s
Development Services
Department/Contractor
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2346 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
21 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
any further work commences in the
affected area. If the find is determined
to be significant and avoidance of the
site has not been achieved, a Phase
III data recovery plan shall be
prepared by the Project Archeologist,
in consultation with the Tribe, and
shall be submitted to the City for their
review and approval prior to
implementation of the said plan.

MM TCR 6: Human Remains. If
human remains are discovered, no
further disturbance shall occur in the
affected area until the County Coroner
has made necessary findings as to
origin. If the County Coroner
determines that the remains are
potentially Native American, the
California Native American Heritage
Commission shall be notified within 24
hours of the published finding to be
given a reasonable opportunity to
identify the “most likely descendant”.

The “most likely descendant” shall
then make recommendations, and
engage in consultations concerning
the treatment of the remains
(California Public Resources Code
5097.98). (GP Objective 23.3, CEQA).

Ongoing During
Construction
Qualified Professional
Archeologist/County
Coroner/Contractor
MM TCR 7: Non-Disclosure of
Reburial Locations. It is understood by
all parties that unless otherwise
required by law, the site of any
reburial of Native American human
remains or associated grave goods
shall not be disclosed and shall not be
governed by public disclosure
requirements of the California Public
Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant
to the specific exemption set forth in
California Government Code 6254 (r).,
parties, and Lead Agencies, will be
asked to withhold public disclosure
information related to such reburial,
pursuant to the specific exemption set
forth in California Government Code
6254 (r).

Ongoing During
Construction
Qualified Professional
Archeologist/County
Coroner/Contractor
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2347 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
22 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
MM TCR 8: Archeology Report -
Phase III and IV. Prior to final
inspection, the developer/permit
holder shall prompt the Project
Archeologist to submit two (2) copies
of the Phase III Data Recovery report
(if required for the Project) and the
Phase IV Cultural Resources
Monitoring Report that complies with
the Community Development
Department's requirements for such
reports. The Phase IV report shall
include evidence of the required
cultural/historical sensitivity training
for the construction staff held during
the pre-grade meeting. The
Community Development Department
shall review the reports to determine
adequate mitigation compliance.

Provided the reports are adequate,
the Community Development
Department shall clear this condition.

Once the report(s) are determined to
be adequate, two (2) copies shall be
submitted to the Eastern Information
Center (EIC) at the University of
California Riverside (UCR) and one
(1) copy shall be submitted to the
Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural
Resources Department(s).

Prior to Final
Inspection
Developer/Qualified
Professional Archeologist/City’s
Development Services
Department
MM TCR 9: In accordance with
consultations and determinations
made by the developer and the
Pechanga Tribe, all recorded features
within CA-RIV-8274 will be avoided
except for bedrock milling feature (1),
which is on Lot 8. The Pechanga
Tribe shall work with the project
archaeologist, the developer, and the
grading contractor or appropriate
personnel to determine a reasonable
methodology for relocating these
features. Attempts will be made to
excavate and relocate these boulders
to the open space preserve, should
their size and depth permit. If the
boulders cannot be moved intact due
to feasibility constraints, an attempt
will be made to transversally cut into
them so as to free the exposed
prehistoric features, allowing the
slicks themselves to be relocated to
the adjacent open space preserve.

The current Department of Parks and
Recreation (DPR) forms shall be
Ongoing During
Construction
Developer/Qualified
Professional Archeologist/City’s
Development Services
Department/Contractor
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2348 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
23 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Gateway Heights Project (PEN 21-0066)
City of Moreno Valley
Mitigation Measure
Timing of
Verification
Party Responsible for
Implementation and
Reporting Status/Date/Initials
updated, detailing which features
were relocated, the process taken,
and updated maps provided
documentation of the features’ new
location. The site record should
clearly indicate that the features are
not in their original location and why
they were relocated.

MM TCR 10: Prior to any earthmoving
activities, milling features 3 and 5 of
CA-RIV-8274 will be fenced and
identified as an Environmentally
Sensitive Area (ESA). The Developer
will ensure that appropriate temporary
fencing is installed (i.e., orange
fabric/barrier fencing) to prevent any
unintentional disturbances to features
3 and 5 of CA-RIV-8274 during any
earthmoving activities on the project
site. The fencing will be installed
before clearing and grubbing and will
not be removed until all earthmoving
activities have been completed. The
project archaeologist and Pechanga
Tribal Monitor will be on site to
monitor the fence installation and
removal and will conduct daily
inspections of the fencing to make
sure that it is intact and has not been
breached. If the project archaeologist
and/or Pechanga Tribal Monitor
identify a breach of the fence, i.e.,
removal, cut, depressed, driven over
or intentionally breached in any way,
all work within a 25-foot buffer shall
cease and the Developer, City, project
archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe
shall meet and confer as to the best
method to repair the fencing. The
person(s) responsible for the breach
and the Construction Supervisor (or
appropriate supervisory personnel)
shall be required to retake the
sensitivity training provided at the
beginning of construction, in addition
to any other remedies considered
appropriate.

Prior to any
Earthmoving
Activities
Developer/Qualified
Professional Archeologist/City’s
Development Services
Department/Contractor
F.1.f
Packet Pg. 2349 Attachment: Exhibit C to Resolution No. 2023-XX - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 1 Ordinance No. XXX
Date Adopted: December 5, 2023
ORDINANCE NO. XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CHANGE OF ZONE (PEN20-0096) TO AMEND THE CITY ZONING ATLAS FROM RESIDENTIAL 2
DISTRICT (R2) AND HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (HR) TO RESIDENTIAL 10 DISTRICT (R10) AND OPEN SPACE (OS) DISTRICT

FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF MORTON
ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF JENNINGS COURT
(APN 256-150-001).

WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California; and has the authority to approve amendments to the City’s General Plan and City’s Zoning Atlas; and
WHEREAS, HengHou Group (“Applicant”) has submitted is seeking approval for the Gateway Heights Residential Project which includes approval of General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095), Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) and Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127) for the development of a 108-unit detached townhouse condominium Planned Unit Development on 32.56-acres, with associated amenities and public improvements (“Proposed Project”) located on the east side of Morton Road, approximately 300 feet north of Jennings Court (APN 256-150-001) (“Project Site”); and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2023, the public hearing to consider the Proposed Project was duly conducted by the Planning Commission at which time all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to testify and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2023, a public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission to consider General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095), after which the Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution 2023-23, a recommendation that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095); and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2023, a hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission whereby the Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-22, recommending the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures) of the Municipal Code and Government Code section 65905, a public hearing was scheduled for September 5, 2023, before the City Council and notice thereof was duly published and posted, and mailed to all property owners of record with 600 feet of the Site; and
F.1.g
Packet Pg. 2350 Attachment: Ordinance No. XXXX (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 2 Ordinance No. XXX
Date Adopted: December 5, 2023
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2023, the City Council continued the consideration of the Proposed Project and public hearing to a date uncertain; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2023, the public hearing to consider the Proposed Project was duly conducted by the City Council at which time all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to testify and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2022, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines, the City Council considered and approved Resolution 2023-__ certifying the Proposed Project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. AMENDMENT OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS
The City of Moreno Valley Official Zoning Atlas, as adopted by Ordinance No. 981, on August 3, 2021, of the City of Moreno Valley, and as amended thereafter from time to time by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, is further amended by placing in effect the zone or zone classification to page 96 of the Official Zoning Atlas as shown on the attached map marked “Exhibit A” and included herein by reference and on file in the office of the City Clerk.

Section 2. EFFECT OF ENACTMENT
Except as specifically provided herein, nothing contained in this ordinance shall be deemed to modify or supersede any prior enactment of the City Council which addresses the same subject addressed herein.

Section 3. NOTICE OF ADOPTION
Within fifteen days after the date of adoption hereof, the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be posted in three public places within the city.

Section 4. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect thirty days after the date of its adoption. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]
F.1.g
Packet Pg. 2351 Attachment: Ordinance No. XXXX (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 3 Ordinance No. XXX
Date Adopted: December 5, 2023
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5
th day of December, 2023.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

CITY COUNCIL
____________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Jane Halstead, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla, Interim City Attorney
F.1.g
Packet Pg. 2352 Attachment: Ordinance No. XXXX (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 4 Ordinance No. XXX
Date Adopted: December 5, 2023

ORDINANCE JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, Jane Halstead, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Ordinance No. XXX was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5 th day of December, 2023,
by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
___________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
F.1.g
Packet Pg. 2353 Attachment: Ordinance No. XXXX (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 5 Ordinance No. XXX
Date Adopted: December 5, 2023

EXHIBIT A
Existing and Proposed Zoning Map
F.1.g
Packet Pg. 2354 Attachment: Ordinance No. XXXX (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
(PEN20-0095), TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP,
CHANGING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM RESIDENTIAL 2 (R2) AND HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (HR) TO RESIDENTIAL 10 (R10) AND PARKS/OPEN SPACE (OS), CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PEN21-0066)

FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38459 (PEN22-0127) FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 108-UNIT

TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINIUM
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California; and has the authority to approve amendments to the City’s General Plan and City’s Zoning Atlas; and
WHEREAS, HengHou Group (“Applicant”) is seeking approval for the Gateway Heights Residential Project, which includes approval of General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095), Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) and Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127) for the development of a 108-unit detached townhouse condominium Planned Unit Development on 32.56-acres, with associated amenities and public improvements (“Proposed Project”) located on the east side of Morton Road, approximately 300 feet north of Jennings Court (APN 256-150-001) (“Project Site”); and WHEREAS, Section 9.02.060 (Conditional Use Permits) of the Municipal Code acknowledges that the purpose of a conditional use permit is to allow the establishment of uses that may have special impacts or uniqueness such that their effect on the surrounding environment cannot be determined in advance of the use being proposed for a particular location and that the conditional use permit application process involves the review of the location, design, and configuration of improvements related to the Proposed Project, and the potential impact of the Proposed Project on the surrounding area based on fixed and established standards; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 9.14 (Land Division) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code imposes conditions of approval upon projects for which a Tentative Tract Map is required, which conditions may be imposed by the City to address on-site improvements, off-site improvements, the manner in which the Project Site is used, and any other conditions as may be deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety, and welfare and ensure that the Proposed Project will be developed in accordance with the purpose and intent of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the applications for the Proposed Project have been evaluated in accordance with Section 9.02.060 (Conditional Use Permits) and Chapter 9.14 (Land Divisions), respectively, of the Municipal Code with consideration given to the City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and other applicable laws and regulations; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2023, a public hearing to consider the Proposed Project was duly conducted by the Planning Commission, at which time all interested persons F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2355 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) were provided with an opportunity to testify and present evidence; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2023, a public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission to consider General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095), after which the Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution 2023-23, a recommendation that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment (PEN20- 0095); and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2023, a public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission to consider Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) and Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127), whereby the Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution 2023-26, a recommendation that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) and Tentative Tract Map 38237 (PEN22-0127); and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2023, a hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission whereby the Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-22, recommending the City Council approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration/Initial Study, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures) of the Municipal Code and Government Code section 65905, a public hearing was scheduled for September 5, 2023, before the City Council and notice thereof was duly published and posted, and mailed to all property owners of record with 600 feet of the Site; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2023, the public hearing to consider the Proposed Project was duly conducted by the City Council. At said hearing, the City Council continued the consideration of the Proposed Project to a future date; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2023, the public hearing to consider the Proposed Project was duly conducted by the City Council at which time all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to testify and to present evidence; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2022, in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines, the City Council considered and approved Resolution 2023-__ certifying the Proposed Project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration, and adopting a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals and Exhibits
That the foregoing Recitals and attached Exhibits are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2356 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Section 2. Notice
That pursuant to Government Code section 66020(d)(1), notice is hereby given that the Proposed Project is subject to certain fees, dedications, reservations and other exactions as provided herein, in the staff report and conditions of approval (collectively, “Conditions”); and these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions, and interested parties have ninety-days from the approval of this Resolution to protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a).

Section 3. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all of the evidence submitted into the administrative record for the General Plan Amendment, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Moreno Valley General Plan and all relevant provisions contained therein; (b) Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and all other relevant provisions referenced therein;
(c) The Moreno Valley General Plan amendment changing the land use designation from Residential 2 (R2) and Hillside Residential (HR) to Residential 10 (R10) and Parks/Open Space (OS) and all relevant provisions contained therein as shown on Exhibit A;
(d) Applications for the approval of a General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095), Change of Zone (PEN20-0096), Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127), and Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066), and all documents, records and references contained therein;
(e) Testimony, comments, and correspondence from all persons that were provided at, or prior to, the June 8, 2023, Planning Commission public hearing;
(f) Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-22, recommending that the City Council certify and approve the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and approve the Proposed Project;
(g) Staff Report prepared for the City Council’s consideration and all documents, records, and references related thereto, and Staff’s presentation at the September 5, 2023, public hearing; and
(h) Testimony, comments, and correspondence from all persons that were provided at, or prior to, the City Council September 5, 2023, and the December 5, 2023, public hearing.

Section 4. Findings
That based on the foregoing Recitals and the Evidence contained in the Administrative Record as set forth above, the City Council makes the following findings:
(a) That the Proposed Project is consistent with the existing goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan;
F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2357 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) (b) That the Proposed Project will not adversely affect the public health, safety, or general welfare;
(c) That the Proposed Project is consistent with the purposes and intent of Title 9;
(d) That the Proposed Project complies with all applicable zoning and other regulations;
(e) The location, design, and operation of the Proposed Project will be compatible with existing and planned land uses in the vicinity; (f) That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans
(g) That the Project Site is physically suitable for the type of development; (h) That the Project Site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the proposed density of the development;
(i) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife and/or their habitat; (j) That the design of the Proposed Project and the proposed improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems;
(k) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision;
(l) That the requirements of CEQA have been satisfied;
(m) That the proposed land division is not subject to the Williamson Act pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965;
(n) That the proposed land division and the associated design and improvements are consistent with applicable ordinances of the city; (o) That the design of the land division provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision; and (p) That the effect of the Proposed Project on the housing needs of the region were considered and balanced against the public service needs of the residents of Moreno Valley and available fiscal and environmental resources Section 5. Approval
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Evidence, and Findings, the City Council hereby approves the Proposed Project, which includes General Plan Amendment (PEN20- 0095) as depicted in Exhibit A, and the necessary and corresponding amendment to the City’s Zoning Atlas, Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) and Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127), attached hereto as Exhibit B.

Section 6. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions as heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 7. Severability
That the City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2358 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 8. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon the date of adoption.

Section 9. Certification
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 5th day of December 2023.
____________________________________
Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jane Halstead, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla, Interim City Attorney
Exhibits:

Exhibit A: General Plan Amendment Land Use Exhibit
Exhibit B: Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) and Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127) Conditions of Approval
F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2359 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Exhibit A
General Plan Amendment
F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2360 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Exhibit B
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066) and Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127) Conditions of Approval
F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2361 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)
EFFECTIVE DATE:

EXPIRATION DATE:

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division

1. This approval is for Conditional Use Permit (PEN22-0066) for a Planned Unit Development to address development standards for Tentative Tract Map 38459 (PEN22-0127), a subdivision of approximately 32.56 acres of vacant land into an approximate 16.59-acre common-area lot with 108 air space parcels for condominium purposes with a public park, and an approximate 15.97-acre remainder open-space lot, including development standards and design criteria for the construction of new homes and public amenities. A change or modification to the land use or the approved site plans may require a separate approval. Prior to any change or modification, the property owner shall contact the City of Moreno Valley Community Development Department to determine if a separate approval is required.

2. The Homeowners Association, developer, or the developer's successor-in-interest shall be responsible for maintaining any undeveloped portion of the site in a manner that provides for the control of weeds, erosion and dust.

3. This approval shall expire three years after the approval date of this project unless used or extended as provided for by the City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code; otherwise it shall become null and void and of no effect whatsoever. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three-year period, which is thereafter pursued to completion.

4. The Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, city council, commissions, boards, subcommittees and the City’s elected and appointed officials, commissioners, board members, officers, agents, consultants and employees (“City Parties”) from and against any and all liabilities, demands, claims, actions or proceedings and costs and expenses incidental thereto (including costs of defense, settlement and reasonable attorneys' fees), which any or all of them may suffer, incur, be responsible for or pay out as a result of or in connection with any challenge to the legality, validity or adequacy of any of the following items: (i) any prior or current agreements by and among the City and the Developer; (ii) the current, concurrent and subsequent permits, licenses and entitlements approved by the City; (iii) any environmental determination made by the City in connection with F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2362 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) the Project Site and the Project; and (iv) any proceedings or other actions undertaken by the City in connection with the adoption or approval of any of the above. In the event of any administrative, legal, equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party (including without limitation a governmental entity or official) challenging the legality, validity or adequacy of any of the above items or any portion thereof, the Parties shall mutually cooperate with each other in defense of said action or proceeding. Notwithstanding the above, the City, at its sole option, may tender the complete defense of any third party challenge as described herein. In the event the City elects to contract with special counsel to provide for such a defense, the City shall meet and confer with the Developer regarding the selection of counsel, and the Developer shall pay all costs related to retention of such counsel by the City.

5. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash and debris.

6. The site shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans on file in the Community Development Department - Planning Division, the Municipal Code regulations, General Plan, Gateway Heights PUD, and the conditions contained herein. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Official.

7. Any signs indicated on the submitted plans are not included with this approval. Any signs, whether permanent (e.g. wall, monument) or temporary (e.g. banner, flag), require separate application and approval by the Planning Division.

8. All site plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans, fence/wall plans, lighting plans and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with this approval.

Special Conditions

9. Prior to grading permits, the developer or successor in interest shall submit a wall and fence plan showing basin fencing, to include wrought iron fencing with pilasters.

10. Prior to approval of the first certificate of occupancy for a townhouse unit, a basin maintained by an HOA or other private entity, landscape (trees, shrubs and groundcover) and irrigation shall be installed, and maintained by the HOA or other private entity with documentation provided to the Planning Division.

11. Prior to issuance of grading permits, colors and materials for exterior building materials including roofing, fences/walls, etc., shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division as this project is adjacent to a Hillside Residential land use 2 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2363 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) designation. All exterior colors and building materials shall be consistent with the Gateway Heights PUD and shall blend with the surrounding natural environment.

12. The grading plans shall show the open space lot to be preserved, and any conservation easement lots.

13. A drought tolerant landscape palette shall be utilized throughout the tract in compliance with the City’s Landscape Requirements, the Gateway Heights PUD document, and the Preliminary and Final Fuel Modification / Vegetation Control Plan.

14. Prior to any site disturbance and/or grading plan submittal, or prior to the recordation of a final map, a mitigation monitoring fee, as provided by City ordinance, shall be paid by the applicant/owner. No City permit or approval shall be issued until such fee is paid. (CEQA)

15. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the following documents shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division which shall demonstrate that the project will be developed and maintained in accordance with the intent and purpose of the approval:

1. The document to convey title

2. Deed restrictions, easements, or Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions to be recorded
The approved documents shall be recorded at the same time that the subdivision map is recorded. The documents shall contain provisions for general maintenance of the site, joint access to proposed parcels, open space use restrictions, conservation easements, guest parking, feeder trails, water quality basins, lighting, landscaping and common area use items such as general building maintenance (condominium townhomes) public park amenities and other recreation facilities. The approved documents shall also contain a provision, which provides that they may not be terminated and/or substantially amended without the consent of the City and the developer's successor-in-interest.

In addition, the following deed restrictions and disclosures shall be included within the document and grant deed of the properties:
a. The developer and homeowners association shall promote the use of native plants and trees and drought tolerant species.
b. All lots designated for open space and or detention basins, shall be included as an easement to, and maintained by a Homeowners Association (HOA) or other 3 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2364 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) public or private maintenance entity. Language to this effect shall be included and reviewed within the required Covenant Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) prior to the approval of the final map.
c. Maintenance of any and all common facilities.
d. A conservation easement for lettered lots shall be recorded on the deed of the property and shown on the final map.

16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall provide documentation that contact was made to the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes.

17. Prior to grading plan approval, wall and fence plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division subject to the City’s Municipal Code including the following:
a. Perimeter fencing shall be constructed of decorative masonry with pilasters and wrought iron.
b. Galvanized steel rock garden walls may be used for private patio spaces at each townhome.
c. Non-combustible fencing is required for all lots adjacent to all fuel modification zones, subject to the approval of the Fire Department.

18. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the owner/developer or successor in interest shall record a deed restriction on the subject site, affecting all riverine features and buffer areas of the site stating that no fuel modification activities will be allowed within any riverine features. The deed restriction shall further state that fuel modification maintenance activities that occur in the buffer areas around, but not overlapping, the riverine features, may be done using only hand tools and no native plant species may be removed. The owner/developer shall acknowledge that the intention of this deed restriction / restrictive covenant shall be binding upon all future owners, successors and heirs to the subject property. A public disclosure notice/ statement describing the above deed restriction shall be recorded on the title of all subsequently-subdivided land parcels and air parcels created for the development of a detached townhouse condominium development.

19. In accordance with Developer’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, including but not limited to as set forth in more detail in the Project’s Conditions of Approval, Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 9.02.310 (Indemnification of City for Discretionary Approvals), and the Project application, Developer shall enter into an Advanced Funding Agreement with the City no later 4 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2365 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) than ten (10) calendar days from Planning Commission’s approval of the Project. A copy of said Agreement is on file with the Community Development Director.

Prior to Grading Permit

20. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the site plan and grading plans shall show decorative hardscape (e.g. colored concrete, stamped concrete, pavers or as approved by the Planning Official) consistent and compatible with the design, color and materials of the proposed development for all driveway ingress/egress locations of the project.

21. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, all Conditions of Approval, Mitigation Measures and Airport Land Use Commission Conditions of Approval shall be printed on the grading plans.

22. Prior to issuance of any grading permits, mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program approved with this project shall be implemented as provided therein. A mitigation monitoring fee, as provided by City ordinance, shall be paid by the applicant within 30 days of project approval. No City permit or approval shall be issued until such fee is paid. (CEQA)

23. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, all Conditions of Approval, Mitigation Measures and Airport Land Use Commission Conditions of Approval shall be printed on the building plans.

24. Prior to issuance of any building permits, final Landscaping and Irrigation Plans, and Final Fuel Modification/ Vegetation Control Plans, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division and Fire Department. After the third plan check review for landscape plans, an additional plan check fee shall apply. The plans shall be prepared in accordance with the City's Landscape Requirements and shall include:
a. Drought tolerant landscape shall be used. Sod shall be limited to common open space gathering areas.
b. Street trees shall be provided every 40 feet on center in the right of way, subject to approval by the Fire Department.
c. Enhanced landscaping shall be provided at all driveway entries and street corner locations The review of all utility boxes, transformers etc. shall be coordinated to provide adequate screening from public view. d. All site perimeter landscape and irrigation shall be installed prior to the release of certificate of any occupancy permits for the townhouse cluster pad in 5 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2366 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) question.

Building Division

25. Prior to submittal, all new development, including residential second units, are required to obtain a valid property address prior to permit application. Addresses can be obtained by contacting the Building Safety Division at 951.413.3350.

26. Contact the Building Safety Division for permit application submittal requirements.

27. Any construction within the city shall only be as follows: Monday through Friday seven a.m. to seven p.m(except for holidays which occur on weekdays), eight a.m. to four p.m.; weekends and holidays (as observed by the city and described in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code Chapter 2.55), unless written approval is first obtained from the Building Official or City Engineer.

28. Building plans submitted shall be signed and sealed by a California licensed design professional as required by the State Business and Professions Code.

29. The proposed development shall be subject to the payment of required development fees as required by the City’s current Fee Ordinance at the time a building application is submitted or prior to the issuance of permits as determined by the City.

30. The proposed project will be subject to approval by the Eastern Municipal Water District and all applicable fees and charges shall be paid prior to permit issuance.

Contact the water district at 951.928.3777 for specific details.

31. All new structures shall be designed in conformance to the latest design standards adopted by the State of California in the California Building Code, (CBC) Part 2, Title 24, California Code of Regulations including requirements for allowable area, occupancy separations, fire suppression systems, accessibility, etc.

32. The proposed project’s occupancy shall be classified by the Building Official and must comply with exiting, occupancy separation(s) and minimum plumbing fixture requirements. Minimum plumbing fixtures shall be provided per the California Plumbing Code, Table 422.1. The occupant load and occupancy classification shall be determined in accordance with the California Building Code.

33. The proposed residential project shall comply with the California Green Building Standards Code, Section 4.106.4, mandatory requirements for Electric Vehicle Charging Station (EVCS).

34. Prior to permit issuance, every applicant shall submit a properly completed Waste 6 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2367 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Management Plan (WMP), as a portion of the building or demolition permit process. (MC 8.80.030)

FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Prevention Bureau

35. All Fire Department access roads or driveways shall not exceed 12 percent grade. (CFC 503.2.7 and MVMC 8.36.060[G])

36. The Fire Department emergency vehicular access road shall be (all weather surface) capable of sustaining an imposed load of 80,000 lbs. GVW, based on street standards approved by the Public Works Director and the Fire Prevention Bureau. The approved fire access road shall be in place during the time of construction. Temporary fire access roads shall be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 501.4, and MV City Standard Engineering Plan 108d)

37. The angle of approach and departure for any means of Fire Department access shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft (0.3 m drop in 6 m), and the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the Fire Department shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. (CFC 503 and MVMC 8.36.060)

38. Prior to construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have an approved Fire Department access based on street standards approved by the Public Works Director and the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 501.4)

39. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant/developer shall provide the Fire Prevention Bureau with an approved site plan for Fire Lanes and signage. (CFC 501.3)

40. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, “Blue Reflective Markers” shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations in accordance with City specifications. (CFC 509.1 and MVLT 440A-0 through MVLT 440C-0)

41. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans specifying the required structural materials for building construction in high fire hazard severity zones shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. (CFC, 4905)

42. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, all buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side and rear access locations. The numerals shall be a minimum of twelve inches in height. (CFC 505.1, MVMC 8.36.060[I])

43. Existing fire hydrants on public streets are allowed to be considered available. 7 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2368 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Existing fire hydrants on adjacent properties shall not be considered available unless fire apparatus access roads extend between properties and easements are established to prevent obstruction of such roads. (CFC 507, 501.3) a - After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed, made serviceable, and be accepted by the Moreno Valley Fire Department prior to beginning construction. They shall be maintained accessible.

44. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in effect at the time of building plan submittal.

45. The Fire Code Official is authorized to enforce the fire safety during construction requirements of Chapter 33. (CFC Chapter 33 & CBC Chapter 33)

46. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant/developer shall participate in the Fire Impact Mitigation Program. (Fee Resolution as adopted by City Council)

47. Fire lanes and fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty–four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less the thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 503.2.1 and MVMC 8.36.060[E])

48. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, the applicant/developer shall install a fire sprinkler system based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Chapter 9, MVMC 8.36.100[D])

49. Prior to issuance of the building permit for development, independent paved access to the nearest paved road, maintained by the City shall be designed and constructed by the developer within the public right of way in accordance with City Standards. (MVMC 8.36.060, CFC 501.4)

50. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, a “Knox Box Rapid Entry System” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Fire Code Official. All exterior security emergency access gates shall be electronically operated and be provided with Knox key switches for access by emergency personnel. (CFC 506.1)

51. The minimum number of fire hydrants required, as well as the location and spacing of fire hydrants, shall comply with the C.F.C., MVMC, and NFPA 24. Fire hydrants shall be located no closer than 40 feet to a building. A fire hydrant shall be located within 50 feet of the fire department connection for buildings protected with a fire 8 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2369 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) sprinkler system. The size and number of outlets required for the approved fire hydrants are (6” x 4” x 2 ½” x 2 ½”) (CFC 507.5.1, 507.5.7, Appendix C, NFPA 24-7.2.3, MVMC 912.2.1)

52. Fire Department access driveways over 150 feet in length shall have a turn-around as determined by the Fire Prevention Bureau capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 503 and MVMC 8.36.060, CFC 501.4)

53. During phased construction, dead end roadways and streets which have not been completed shall have a turn-around capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 503.1 and 503.2.5)

54. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide an approved emergency vehicular access way for fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 501.4)

55. Preliminary fuel modification plans shall be reviewed and approved by the fire code official concurrent with the submittal for approval of any tentative map. Final fuel modification plans shall be submitted to and approved by the fire code official prior to the issuance of a grading permit.

56. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval.

Measures shall include, but are not limited to: noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), fuel modification zones, etc. (CFC Chapter 49)

57. Plans for private water mains supplying fire sprinkler systems and/or private fire hydrants shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. (CFC 105 and CFC 3312.1)

58. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all buildings per CFC Appendix B and Table B105.1. The applicant/developer shall provide documentation to show there exists a water system capable of delivering said waterflow for 2 hour(s) duration at 20-PSI residual operating pressure. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Specific requirements for the project will be determined at time of submittal. (CFC 507.3, Appendix B)

59. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or Building Final, all residential dwellings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the residence in such a position that the numbers are easily visible to approaching emergency vehicles. The numbers shall be located consistently on each dwelling throughout the development. The numerals shall be no less than four (4) inches in height and shall be low voltage lighted fixtures. (CFC 505.1, MVMC 8.36.060[I]) 9 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2370 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

60. Single Family Dwellings. Schedule "A" fire prevention approved standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x 2 ½”) shall be located at each intersection of all residential streets. Hydrants shall be spaced no more than 500 feet apart in any direction so that no point on the street is more than 250 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 1 hour duration of 20 PSI. Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, serving one and two-family residential developments, standard fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1000 feet along the tract boundary for transportation hazards. (CFC 507.3, Appendix B, MVMC

8.36.060).

61. Final Fire Protection Fuel Modification Plan shall be submitted, reviewed, and approved before the submittal of Building Plans to the City of Moreno Valley’s Planning and Fire Departments. Fuel Modification Plan’s implementation and installation shall be in place before occupancy is granted for first dwelling unit.

62. Fuel Modification Maintenance shall be delineated by providing legal binding statement in community’s CC&Rs specifying the community’s responsibility, covenants, and conditions for maintenance of fuel modification zones and vegetation. Such document(s) shall be provided for review to the Fire Prevention Bureau and Land Development before the recordation of the final tract map.

63. Dead-end streets and/or fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround for fire apparatus.

64. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 503.2.5)

65. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review. Plans shall: a.

Be signed by a registered civil engineer or a certified fire protection engineer; b .

Contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and c. Conform to hydrant type, location, spacing of new and existing hydrants and minimum fire flow required as determined by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed, made serviceable, and be accepted by the Moreno Valley Fire Department prior to beginning construction. They shall be maintained accessible.

FINANCIAL & MANAGEMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Moreno Valley Utility
10 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2371 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

66. This project shall coordinate and receive approval from the City Engineer to install, construct, improve, and dedicate to Moreno Valley Utility electric streetlight improvements consisting of streetlight poles, mast-arms, fixtures conduit, wiring, terminations and pull boxes to serve the identified development and other adjoining, abutting, or benefiting projects as determined by the Land Development Department along with any appurtenant real property easements, as determined by the City Engineer to be necessary for the distribution and/or delivery of any and all “street light services” to and within the project.

67. This project shall coordinate and receive approval from the City Engineer to install, construct, improve, and dedicate to Moreno Valley Utility fiber optic cable improvements consisting of conduit, and pull boxes to serve the identified development and other adjoining, abutting, or benefiting projects as determined by Moreno Valley Utility along with any appurtenant real property easements, as determined by the City Engineer to be necessary for the distribution and/or delivery of any and all “fiber optic services” to and within the project.

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Land Development

68. Aggregate slurry, as defined in Section 203-5 of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, shall be required prior to 90% security reduction or the end of the one-year warranty period of the public streets as approved by the City Engineer.

If slurry is required, a slurry mix design shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer. The latex additive shall be Ultra Pave 70 (for anionic) or Ultra Pave 65 K (for cationic) or an approved equal per the geotechnical report. The latex shall be added at the emulsion plant after weighing the asphalt and before the addition of mixing water. The latex shall be added at a rate of two to two-and-one-half (2 to 2½) parts to one-hundred (100) parts of emulsion by volume.

Any existing striping shall be removed prior to slurry application and replaced per City standards.

69. The developer shall comply with all applicable City ordinances and resolutions including the City’s Municipal Code (MC) and if subdividing land, the Government Code (GC) of the State of California, specifically Sections 66410 through 66499.58, said sections also referred to as the Subdivision Map Act (SMA). [MC 9.14.010]

70. The final approved conditions of approval (COAs) issued and any applicable Mitigation Measures by the Planning Division shall be photographically or electronically placed on mylar sheets and included in the Grading and Street Improvement plans.

71. The developer shall monitor, supervise and control all construction related activities, 11 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2372 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) so as to prevent these activities from causing a public nuisance, including but not limited to, insuring strict adherence to the following:
(a) Removal of dirt, debris, or other construction material deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day.
(b) Observance of working hours as stipulated on permits issued by the Land Development Division.
(c) The construction site shall accommodate the parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the site. (d) All dust control measures per South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) requirements during the grading operations.

Violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions shall subject the owner, applicant, developer or contractor(s) to remedy as noted in City Municipal Code 8.14.090. In addition, the City Engineer or Building Official may suspend all construction related activities for violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions until such time as it has been determined that all operations and activities are in conformance with these conditions.

72. Drainage facilities (e.g., catch basins, water quality basins, etc.) with sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary 100-year storm flows.

Secondary emergency escape shall also be provided.

73. In the event right-of-way or offsite easements are required to construct offsite improvements necessary for the orderly development of the surrounding area to meet the public health and safety needs, the developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the needed right-of-way in accordance with the Land Development Division’s administrative policy. If unsuccessful, the Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to acquire the necessary right-of-way or offsite easements and complete the improvements at such time the City acquires the right-of-way or offsite easements which will permit the improvements to be made. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the right-of-way or easement acquisition. [GC 66462.5]

74. If improvements associated with this project are not initiated within two (2) years of the date of approval of the Public Improvement Agreement (PIA), the City Engineer may require that the engineer's estimate for improvements associated with the project be modified to reflect current City construction costs in effect at the time of request for an extension of time for the PIA or issuance of a permit. [MC

9.14.210(B)(C)]

75. The developer shall protect downstream properties from damage caused by alteration of drainage patterns (i.e. concentration or diversion of flow, etc).

Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including, but not limited to, modifying existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement. [MC 9.14.110]
12 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2373 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

76. The maintenance responsibility of the proposed storm drain line shall be clearly identified. Storm drain lines within private property will be privately maintained and those within public streets will be publicly maintained.

77. The proposed private storm drain system shall connect to the proposed West End Moreno Valley Master Drainage Plan (MDP) Line B, which is preliminarily designed to be two 3' X 6' RCB culverts. A storm drain manhole shall be placed at the right-of-way line to mark the beginning of the publicly maintained portion of this storm drain.

78. This project shall submit civil engineering design plans, reports and/or documents (prepared by a registered/licensed civil engineer) for review and approval by the City Engineer per the current submittal requirements, prior to the indicated threshold or as required by the City Engineer. The submittal consists of, but is not limited to, the following:
a. Tract Map (recordation prior to building permit issuance); b. Rough grading w/ erosion control plan (prior to grading permit issuance); c. Precise grading w/ erosion control plan (prior to grading permit issuance); d. Public Improvement plan (e.g., street / storm drain with striping, RCFC storm drain, sewer / water, etc.) (prior to encroachment permit issuance); e. Final drainage study (prior to grading plan approval); f. Final WQMP (prior to grading plan approval);
g. Easements, dedications, vacations, etc. (prior to map approval); h. As-Built revision for all plans (prior to Occupancy release).

79. Water quality best management practices (BMPs) designed to meet Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) requirements for development shall not be used as a construction BMP. Water quality BMPs shall be maintained for the entire duration of the project construction and be used to treat runoff from those developed portions of the project. Water quality BMPs shall be protected from upstream construction related runoff by having proper best management practices in place and maintained. Water quality BMPs shall be graded per the approved design plans and once landscaping and irrigation has been installed. If residential, it and its maintenance shall be turned over to an established Homeowner’s Association (HOA).

Prior to Grading Plan Approval

80. Resolution of all drainage issues shall be as approved by the City Engineer.

81. A final detailed drainage study (prepared by a registered/licensed civil engineer) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer. The study shall include, but not be limited to: existing and proposed hydrologic conditions as well as 13 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2374 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) hydraulic calculations for all drainage control devices and storm drain lines. The study shall analyze 1, 3, 6 and 24-hour duration events for the 2, 5, 10 and 100-year storm events [MC 9.14.110(A.1)]. A digital (pdf) copy of the approved drainage study shall be submitted to the Land Development Division.

82. Emergency overflow areas shall be shown at all applicable drainage improvement locations in the event that the drainage improvement fails or exceeds full capacity.

83. A final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer, which:
a. Addresses Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizes directly connected impervious areas to the City’s street and storm drain systems, and conserves natural areas;
b. Incorporates Source Control BMPs and provides a detailed description of their implementation;
c. Describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for BMPs requiring maintenance; and
d. Describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the BMPs.

A copy of the final WQMP template can be obtained on the City’s Website or by contacting the Land Development Division. A digital (pdf) copy of the approved final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted to the Land Development Division.

84. The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be consistent with the approved P-WQMP, as well as in full conformance with the document: “Water Quality Management Plan - A Guidance Document for the Santa Ana Region of Riverside County” dated October 22, 2012. The F-WQMP shall be submitted and approved prior to application for and issuance of grading permits. At a minimum, the F-WQMP shall include the following: Site Design BMPs; Source Control BMPs, Treatment Control BMPs, Operation and Maintenance requirements for BMPs and sources of funding for BMP implementation. a. The Applicant has proposed to incorporate the use of bioretention. Final design and sizing details of all BMPs must be provided in the first submittal of the F-WQMP. The Applicant acknowledges that more area than currently shown on the plans may be required to treat site runoff as required by the WQMP guidance document.
b. The Applicant shall substantiate the applicable Hydrologic Condition of Concerns (HCOC) in Section F of the F-WQMP.
c. All proposed LID BMP’s shall be designed in accordance with the RCFC&WCD’s Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices, dated September 2011.
d. The proposed LID BMP’s as identified in the project-specific P-WQMP shall 14 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2375 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) be incorporated into the Final WQMP.
e. The NPDES notes per City Standard Drawing No. MVFE-350-0 shall be included in the grading plans.
f. Post-construction treatment control BMPs, once placed into operation for post-construction water quality control, shall not be used to treat runoff from construction sites or unstabilized areas of the site.

85. The developer shall ensure compliance with the City Grading ordinance, these Conditions of Approval and the following criteria:
a. The project street and lot grading shall be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area and outlet points. Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, lot lines shall be located at the top of slopes.
b. Any grading that creates cut or fill slopes adjacent to the street shall provide erosion control, sight distance control, and slope easements as approved by the City Engineer.
c. All improvement plans are substantially complete and appropriate clearance letters are provided to the City.
d. A soils/geotechnical report (addressing the soil’s stability and geological conditions of the site) shall be submitted to the Land Development Division for review. A digital (pdf) copy of the soils/geotechnical report shall be submitted to the Land Development Division.

86. Grading plans (prepared by a registered/licensed civil engineer) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer per the current submittal requirements.

87. The developer shall select Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices (BMPs) designed per the latest version of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) - a guidance document for the Santa Ana region of Riverside County.

88. The developer shall submit recorded slope easements from adjacent property owners in all areas where grading resulting in slopes is proposed to take place outside of the project boundaries. For all other offsite grading, written permission from adjacent property owners shall be submitted.

89. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared in conformance with the State’s current Construction Activities Storm Water General Permit. A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for review upon request.

90. For projects that will result in discharges of storm water associated with construction with a soil disturbance of one or more acres of land, the developer shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and obtain a Waste Discharger’s Identification number (WDID#) from the State Water Quality Control Board (SWQCB) which shall be 15 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2376 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) noted on the grading plans.

Prior to Grading Permit

91. A receipt showing payment of the Area Drainage Plan (ADP) fee to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District shall be submitted. [MC

9.14.100(O)]

92. If the developer chooses to construct the project in phases, a Construction Phasing Plan for the construction of on-site public or private improvements shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer.

93. Security, in the form of a cash deposit (preferable), bond or letter of credit shall be submitted as a guarantee of the implementation and maintenance of erosion control measures. At least twenty-five (25) percent of the required security shall be in the form of a cash deposit with the City. [MC 8.21.160(H)]

94. Security, in the form of a cash deposit (preferable), bond or letter of credit shall be submitted as a guarantee of the completion of the grading operations for the project. [MC 8.21.070]

95. A digital (pdf) copy of all approved grading plans shall be submitted to the Land Development Division.

Prior to Map Approval

96. All proposed street names shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer, if applicable. [MC 9.14.090(E.2.k)]

97. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer. The CC&R's shall include, but not be limited to, access easements, reciprocal access, private and/or public utility easements as may be relevant to the project. In addition, for single-family residential development, bylaws and articles of incorporation shall also be included as part of the maintenance agreement for any water quality BMPs.

98. After recordation, a digital (pdf) copy of the recorded map shall be submitted to the Land Development Division.

99. Resolution of all drainage issues shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 100. If the project involves the subdivision of land, maps may be developed in phases with the approval of the City Engineer. Financial security shall be provided for all public improvements associated with each phase of the map. The boundaries of 16 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2377 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) any multiple map increment shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. If the project does not involve the subdivision of land and it is necessary to dedicate right-of-way/easements, the developer shall make the appropriate offer of dedication by separate instrument. In either case, the City Engineer may require the dedication and construction of necessary utility, street or other improvements beyond the project boundary, if the improvements are needed for circulation, parking, access, or for the welfare or safety of the public. This approval must be obtained prior to the Developer submitting a Phasing Plan to the California Bureau of Real Estate. [MC 9.14.080(B)(C), GC 66412 & 66462.5] 101. Maps (prepared by a registered civil engineer and/or licensed surveyor) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer per the current submittal requirements.
102. Under the current permit for storm water activities required as part of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) as mandated by the Federal Clean Water Act, this project shall establish a Home Owners Association (HOA) to finance the maintenance of the “Water Quality BMPs”. Any lots which are identified as “Water Quality BMPs” shall be owned in fee by the HOA. 103. The developer shall guarantee the completion of all related improvements required for this project by executing a Public Improvement Agreement (PIA) with the City and posting the required security. [MC 9.14.220]
104. All public improvement plans required for this project shall be approved by the City Engineer in order to execute the Public Improvement Agreement (PIA). 105. All street dedications shall be free of all encumbrances, irrevocably offered to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.

Prior to Improvement Plan Approval
106. The developer is required to bring any existing access ramps adjacent to and fronting the project to current ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) requirements.

However, when work is required in an intersection that involves or impacts existing access ramps, all access ramps in that intersection shall be retrofitted to comply with current ADA requirements, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 107. The developer shall submit clearances from all applicable agencies, and pay all applicable plan check fees.
108. The street improvement plans shall comply with current City policies, plans and applicable City standards (i.e. MVSI-160 series, etc.) throughout this project. 17 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2378 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 109. The design plan and profile shall be based upon a centerline, extending beyond the project boundaries a minimum distance of 300 feet at a grade and alignment approved by the City Engineer.
110. Drainage facilities (i.e. catch basins, etc.) with sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary 100-year storm flows. Secondary emergency escape shall also be provided.
111. The hydrology study shall be designed to accept and properly convey all off-site drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event that the City Engineer permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of current City standards shall apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, as in the case where one travel lane in each direction shall not be used for drainage conveyance for emergency vehicle access on streets classified as minor arterials and greater, the developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the City Engineer. [MC 9.14.110 A.2] 112. All public improvement plans (prepared by a licensed/registered civil engineer) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer per the current submittal requirements.
113. Any missing or deficient existing improvements along the project frontage shall be constructed or secured for construction. The City Engineer may require the ultimate structural section for pavement to half-street width plus 18 feet or provide core test results confirming that existing pavement section is per current City Standards; additional signing & striping to accommodate increased traffic imposed by the development, etc.
114. The plans shall indicate any restrictions on trench repair pavement cuts to reflect the City’s moratorium on disturbing newly-constructed pavement less than three (3) years old and recently slurry sealed streets less than one (1) year old. Pavement cuts may be allowed for emergency repairs or as specifically approved in writing by the City Engineer. Special requirements shall be imposed for repaving, limits to be determined by the City Engineer.
115. All dry and wet utilities shall be shown on the plans and any crossings shall be potholed to determine actual location and elevation. Any conflicts shall be identified and addressed on the plans. The pothole survey data shall be submitted to Land Development with the public improvement plans for reference purposes only. The developer is responsible to coordinate with all affected utility companies and bear all costs of any utility relocation.
116. Prior to improvement plan approval, pavement core samples of existing pavement shall be taken and findings submitted to the City for review and consideration of 18 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2379 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) pavement improvements. The City will determine the adequacy of the existing pavement structural section. If the existing pavement structural section is found to be adequate, the developer may still be required to perform a 2 inch grind and overlay or slurry seal, depending on the severity of existing pavement cracking, as required by the City Engineer. If the existing pavement section is found to be inadequate, the Developer shall replace the pavement to meet or exceed the City's pavement structural section standard.

Prior to Encroachment Permit
117. A digital (pdf) copy of all approved improvement plans shall be submitted to the Land Development Division.
118. The plans shall indicate any restrictions on trench repair pavement cuts to reflect the City’s moratorium on disturbing newly-constructed pavement less than three (3) years old and recently slurry sealed streets less than one (1) year old. Pavement cuts may be allowed for emergency repairs or as specifically approved in writing by the City Engineer. Special requirements shall be imposed for repaving, limits to be determined by the City Engineer.
119. Any work performed within public right-of-way requires an encroachment permit.

Prior to Building Permit
120. An engineered-fill certification, rough grade certification and compaction report shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer. A digital (pdf) copy of the approved compaction report shall be submitted to the Land Development Division. All pads shall meet pad elevations per approved grading plans as noted by the setting of “blue-top” markers installed by a registered land surveyor or licensed civil engineer.
121. For all subdivision projects, the map shall be recorded (excluding model homes). [MC 9.14.190]
122. A walk through with a Land Development Inspector shall be scheduled to inspect existing improvements within public right of way along project frontage. Any missing, damaged or substandard improvements including ADA access ramps that do not meet current City standards shall be required to be installed, replaced and /or repaired. The applicant shall post security to cover the cost of the repairs and complete the repairs within the time allowed in the public improvement agreement used to secure the improvements.
123. Certification to the line, grade, flow test and system invert elevations for the water 19 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2380 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) quality control BMPs shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer (excluding models homes).
124. Prior to building permit issuance, the developer shall dedicate the following right of way to accommodate the required improvements:
(a) The necessary street right of way dedication on the east side of Morton Road (60’ R/W / 36’ CC: Local Street, City Standard No. MVSI-107A-0 (Modified)) along the project frontage.
(b) The necessary street right of way dedication on the west side of Morton Road (60’ R/W / 36’ CC: Local Street, City Standard No. MVSI-107A-0 (Modified)) for transition, alignment, and/or drainage purposes.
(c) A 4 foot minimum pedestrian right of way dedication behind any driveway approach per City Standard No. MVSl-112C-0 on Morton Road, as applicable. (d) Corner cutback right of way dedication per City Standard No. MVSl-165-0 on all intersecting public streets, as directed by the City Engineer.

Prior to Occupancy
125. All required as-built plans (prepared by a registered/licensed civil engineer) shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer per the current submittal requirements.
126. The final/precise grade certification shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer.
127. The developer shall complete all public improvements in conformance with current City standards, except as noted in the Special Conditions, including but not limited to the following:
a. Street improvements including, but not limited to: pavement, base, curb and/or gutter, cross gutters, spandrel, sidewalks, drive approaches, pedestrian ramps, street lights (SCE: LS-2), signing, striping, under sidewalk drains, landscaping and irrigation, medians, pavement tapers/transitions and traffic control devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain facilities including, but not limited to: storm drain pipe, storm drain laterals, open channels, catch basins and local depressions. c. City-owned utilities.
d. Sewer and water systems including, but not limited to: sanitary sewer, potable water and recycled water.
128. A “Stormwater Treatment Device and Control Measure Access and Maintenance Covenant”, "Maintenance Agreement for Water Quality Improvements located in the public right-of-way" and a "Declaration of Restrictive Covenants (encroachment on City easement)" shall be recorded to provide public notice of the maintenance requirements to be implemented per the approved final project-specific WQMP. A 20 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2381 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) boilerplate copy of the covenants and agreements can be obtained by contacting the Land Development Division.
129. The applicant shall ensure the following, pursuant to Section XII. I. of the 2010 NPDES Permit:
a. Field verification that structural Site Design, Source Control and Treatment Control BMPs are designed, constructed and functional in accordance with the approved Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP).
b. Certification of best management practices (BMPs) from a state licensed civil engineer. An original WQMP BMP Certification shall be submitted for review and approved by the City Engineer.
130. The Developer shall comply with the following water quality related items:
a. Notify the Land Development Division prior to construction and installation of all structural BMPs so that an inspection can be performed. b. Demonstrate that all structural BMPs described in the approved final project-specific WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with the approved plans and specifications;
c. Demonstrate that Developer is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs described in the approved final project-specific WQMP; and d. Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved final project-specific WQMP are available for future owners/occupants. e. Clean and repair the water quality BMP's, including re-grading to approved civil drawing if necessary.
f. Obtain approval and complete installation of the irrigation and landscaping. 131. Prior to occupancy, the following improvements shall be completed:

Morton Road (60’ R/W / 36’ CC: Local Street, City Standard No. MVSI-107A-0 (Modified)) shall be constructed to achieve a half-width of 18’ plus 12’ beyond centerline, along the entire project's west frontage. Morton Road shall transition to the existing street to the north, and shall transition to the existing street to south, using existing and proposed curvature data. Improvements on the west side may be required for transition, alignment, and/or drainage purposes, as directed by the City Engineer. Improvements shall consist of, but not be limited to, pavement, base, curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, drainage structures, any necessary offsite improvement transition /joins to existing, street lights, pedestrian ramps, and dry and wet utilities.

Prior to improvement plan approval, the developer shall provide to the City Engineer the results of coring tests confirming that said existing pavement section has been constructed per City Standard No. MVSI-107A-0. Any missing or deficient improvements along the project's west frontage shall be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
21 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2382 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Special Districts Division
132. Street Light Coordination/Advanced Energy Fees. Prior to the issuance of the 1st Building Permit for this project, the Developer shall pay New Street Light Installation Fees for all street lights required to be installed for this development. Payment will be collected by the Land Development Division. Fees are based on the street light administration/coordination and advanced energy fees as set forth in the City Fees, Charges, and Rates as adopted by City Council and effective at the time of payment. Any change in the project which increases the number of street lights to be installed requires payment of the fees at the then current fee. Questions may be directed to the Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or [email protected].
133. Major Infrastructure SFD Major Infrastructure Financing District. Prior to applying for the 1st Building Permit, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the annexation fee or use the alternative identified at the time of the special financing district formation) to provide an ongoing funding source for the construction and maintenance of major infrastructure improvements, which may include but is not limited to thoroughfares, bridges, and certain flood control improvements. This condition will be applicable provided said district is under development at the time this project applies for the 1st Building Permit. This condition must be fully satisfied prior to issuance of the 1st Certificate of Occupancy. This condition will be satisfied with the successful annexation/formation (i.e. special election process) into a special financing district and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Annexation into a special financing district requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the public hearing to consider annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings. An alternative to satisfying this condition will be identified at such time as a special financing district has been established. At the time of development, the developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to determine if this condition is applicable. 134. Maintenance Services Funding. Prior to applying for the 1st Building Permit, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the 22 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2383 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) annexation fee or use the alternative identified at the time of the special financing district formation) to provide an ongoing funding source for the operation and maintenance of public improvements and/or services associated with impacts of the development. This condition will only be applicable provided said district is under development at the time this project applies for the 1st Building Permit.

This condition must be fully satisfied prior to issuance of the 1st Certificate of Occupancy. This condition will be satisfied with the successful annexation/formation (i.e. special election process) into a special financing district and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Annexation into a special financing district requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the public hearing to consider annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings.

An alternative to satisfying this funding source will be identified at such time as a special financing district has been established. At the time of development, the developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to determine if this condition is applicable. 135. Public Safety Funding. Prior to applying for the 1st Building Permit, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the annexation fee or use the alternative identified at the time of the special financing district formation ) to provide an ongoing funding source for Public Safety services, which may include but is not limited to Police, Fire Protection, Paramedic Services, Park Rangers, and Animal Control services. This condition will only be applicable provided said district is under development at the time this project applies for the 1st Building Permit.

This condition must be fully satisfied prior to issuance of the 1st Certificate of Occupancy. This condition will be satisfied with the successful annexation/formation (i.e. special election process) into a special financing district and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Annexation into a special financing district requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the public hearing to consider annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/fee that is 23 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2384 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings.

An alternative to satisfying this condition will be identified at such time as a special financing district has been established. At the time of development, the developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to determine if this condition is applicable. 136. CFD 2014-01. Prior to City Council action authorizing the recordation of the map, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the annexation fee, form an association to fund the services or fund an endowment) to provide an ongoing funding source for a) Street Lighting Services for capital improvements, energy charges, and maintenance and b) street and storm drain maintenance.

This condition must be fully satisfied prior to issuance of the 1st Building Permit.

This condition will be satisfied with the successful annexation/formation (i.e. special election process) into a special financing district and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Annexation into a special financing district requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the public hearing to consider annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings.

Alternatively, the condition can be satisfied by the Developer forming a property owner association that will be responsible for the improvements and any and all operation and maintenance costs for the improvements or by funding an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation, as calculated by Special Districts Admin staff. The Developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to satisfy this condition.
137. NPDES Funding. Prior to City Council action authorizing recordation of the final 24 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2385 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) map for the development and if the Land Development Division requires this project to provide a funding source for the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the balloting/annexation fee or fund an endowment) to provide an ongoing funding source for the NPDES program. This condition must be fully satisfied prior to issuance of the 1st Building Permit. This condition will be satisfied with the successful special election process into the NPDES program, or other special financing district, and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Participation in the NPDES program requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, rate or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the City Council action to consider the ballot/annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the ballot/annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/rate/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/rate/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings. (City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code Title 3, Section 3.50.050). Alternatively, the condition can be satisfied by the Developer funding an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation, as calculated by Special Districts Admin staff. The Developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to satisfy this condition. 138. Park Maintenance Funding. Prior to City Council action authorizing the recordation of the map, the qualified elector (e.g. property owner) must initiate the process (i.e. pay the annexation fee or fund an endowment) to provide an ongoing funding source for the continued maintenance, enhancement, and/or retrofit of parks, open spaces, linear parks, and/or trails systems.

This condition must be fully satisfied prior to issuance of the 1st Building Permit.

This condition will be satisfied with the successful annexation/formation (i.e. special election process) into a special financing district and payment of all costs associated with the special election process. Annexation into a special financing district requires an annual payment of the annual special tax, assessment, or fee levied against the property tax bill, or other lawful means, of the parcels of the project for such district. At the time of the public hearing to consider annexation into or formation of the district, the qualified elector(s) will not protest the annexation or formation, but will retain the right to object to any eventual tax/assessment/fee that is not equitable should the financial burden of the tax/assessment/fee not be reasonably proportionate to the benefit the affected property receives from the improvements to be installed and/or maintained or services provided. The special 25 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2386 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) election requires a minimum 90-day process in compliance with the provisions of Article 13C of the California Constitution, Proposition 218, or other applicable legislation, and consistent with the scheduling for City Council meetings.

Alternatively, the condition can be satisfied by the Developer funding an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation, as calculated by Special Districts Admin staff. The Developer must contact Special Districts Administration at 951.413.3470 or at [email protected] to satisfy this condition.
139. The ongoing maintenance of any water quality BMP (e.g. Bioswale) constructed in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of a property owner association or the property owner.
140. Maintenance Responsibility. The ongoing maintenance of any landscaping required to be installed behind the curb shall be the responsibility of the property owner. 141. Zones A and C. The parcel(s) associated with this project is included in Moreno Valley Community Services District Zone A (Parks & Community Services) and Zone C (Arterial Street Lighting). Zone A is levied on the property tax bill on a per parcel or dwelling unit basis. Zone C is levied on the property tax bill on a per parcel basis. Zone A and Zone C are levied against all assessable parcels, and any subdivision thereof.

Transportation Engineering Division
142. All project driveways shall conform to City of Moreno Valley Standard Plans No.

MVSI-111A-0 for residential driveway approaches.
143. Box Springs Road is designated as a Minor Arterial (88'RW/64'CC). Any modifications or improvements undertaken by this project shall be consistent with City Standards or as approved by the City Engineer.
144. Street "A" shall be improved as a modified Local Street (56'RW/36'CC) per City Standard Plan No. MVSI-107A-0. Any improvements undertaken by this project shall be consistent with City Standards or as approved by the City Engineer. A landscaped, raised median shall be installed on Street "A" such that sight distance is not obstructed. Appropriate signage shall be installed to clearly indicate the direction of travel.
145. Street "B" and Street "C" shall be improved as Local Streets (56'RW/36'CC) per City Standard Plan No. MVSI-107A-0. Any improvements undertaken by this project shall be consistent with City Standard.
26 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2387 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 146. Conditions of approval may be modified or added if a phasing plan is submitted for this development.
147. Prior to final approval of any landscaping or monument sign plans, the project plans shall demonstrate that sight distance at the project driveways conforms to City Standard Plan No. MVSI-164A, B, C-0.
148. Prior to the final approval of the street improvement plans, a signing and striping plan shall be prepared per California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) and City of Moreno Valley Standard Plans - Section 4 for all streets within the project area. The signing and striping plan shall include a pedestrian crossing to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer for Street "B:, between Street "A" and Street "C", as shown on the approved exhibits. 149. Prior to issuance of an encroachment permit for works within the public right-of-way, construction traffic control plans prepared by a qualified, registered Civil or Traffic engineer shall be required for plan approval by the City Traffic Engineer. 150. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall coordinate with the City of Riverside Public Works Department and purchase the necessary traffic signal appurtenance equipment for the improvement, as identified in the Gateway Heights Traffic Study, dated February 12, 2021, at the intersection of Sycamore Canyon Road and Fair Isle Drive.
151. Prior to acceptance of streets into the City-maintained road system, all approved signing and striping shall be installed per current City Standards and the approved plans.

PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
152. This project is subject to current Development Impact Fees. 27 of 27

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)

F.1.h
Packet Pg. 2388 Attachment: Resolution No. 2023-XX General Plan Amendment_CUP_Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Amended Planned Unit
Development
Narrative
FOR
Monterra
Submitted to
Town of Florence, Arizona
January 2012

APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER(S)
LANGLEY RIGGINS 600, LLC
2738 E. Guadalupe Road
Gilbert, AZ 85234
(480) 633-0999

RMG MONTERRA SOUTH, LLC
8800 N. Gainey Center Drive
Suite 255
Scottsdale, AZ 85258
(480) 609-1200

AGENT/ENGINEER

UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP
December 2022
Gateway Heights
Planned Unit Development
Moreno Valley, California
8885 H AVEN A VENUE | S TE 195 | R ANCHO C UCAMONGA , CA 91730 909 - 466 - 9240
Prepared for:

HengHou Group
177 E. Colorado Blvd.

Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2389 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 2 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FOR
Gateway Heights
December 2022
Submitted to
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Fredrick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
(951) 413-3000

APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER(S)
HengHou Group
Shizao Zheng
1378 West Zhongshan Rd
Ningbo, China 315-016

PROJECT MANAGER
Ackerman Law
Jason Ackerman
3200 E. Guasti Road
Suite 100
Ontario, CA 91761
(909) 223-3302
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2390 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 3 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

ENGINEER

UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP-CALIFORNIA, INC
Beau Cooper
8885 Haven Avenue
Suite 195
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 466-9240

ARCHITECT

KNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC
17752 Mitchell N.

Suite C
Irvine, CA 92614
(949) 752-1177
UEG Project No. 30182
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2391 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 4 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................... 6

2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTION.......................................................................................... 6

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS...................................................................................................................... 7

4.0 RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES............................................................................... 7

5.0 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN................................................................................................. 8

5.1 Cluster Design ............................................................................................................................... 8

5.2 Alternative Design Standards........................................................................................................ 9

5.2.1 Lot Coverage ......................................................................................................................... 9

5.2.2 Building Setbacks .................................................................................................................. 9

5.2.3 Building Height....................................................................................................................10

5.2.4 Street Sections....................................................................................................................10

5.3 Fire Protection Plan.....................................................................................................................10

5.4 Community Park & Landscape Buffers........................................................................................11

5.4.1 General Guidelines..............................................................................................................11

5.5 Entry Monuments, Walls & Project Theme ................................................................................11

5.5.1 General Guidelines..............................................................................................................12

5.6 Perimeter Yard Landscaping .......................................................................................................12

5.7 Private Open Space.....................................................................................................................13

6.0 ARCHITECTURE................................................................................................................................44

6.1 General Guidelines......................................................................................................................44

6.2 Architectural styles .....................................................................................................................44

6.2.1 Santa Barbara......................................................................................................................44

6.2.2 Modern Farmhouse ............................................................................................................45

7.0 UTILITIES..........................................................................................................................................46

8.0 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&R’S)..............................................................47 F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2392 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 5 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

EXHIBITS
A. Vicinity Map
B. Development Area
C. USGS Topographic Map
D. FEMA FIRM Map
E. General Plan Map
F. Zoning Map
G. Area Circulation Map
H. Gateway Specific Plan
I. Surrounding Jurisdictions
J. Open Space/Park Plan
K. Cluster Detail
L. Street Sections
M. Conceptual Wall & Fence Plan

ARCHITECTURE
A-1.1 – Plan 1 Floor Plan A
A-1.2 – Plan 1 Floor Plan B
A-1.3 – Plan 1 Elevation A
A-1.4 – Plan 1 Elevation B
A-2.1 – Plan 2 Floor Plan A
A-2.2 – Plan 2 Floor Plan B
A-2.3 – Plan 2 Elevation A
A-2.4 – Plan 2 Elevation B
A-3.1 – Plan 3 Floor Plan A
A-3.2 – Plan 3 Floor Plan B
A-3.3 – Plan 3 Elevation A
A-3.4 – Plan 3 Elevation B

SITE PLAN
Sheet 1 – Preliminary Site Plan
Sheet 2 – Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan
APPENDIX 1
Preliminary Fire Protection Technical Report/Plan
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2393 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 6 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

1.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to describe the overall design concept for the Gateway Heights project and outline the design details that will be incorporated into the final design decisions. The Gateway Heights project presents innovative housing options within the City of Moreno Valley, while delivering a vast amount of recreational open space to the surrounding communities. This manual includes both design standards and guidelines. The guidelines in this document will lay out both functional and aesthetic design concepts as an overall strategy to be followed at the time of development. The primary objective is to establish a consistent theme throughout the project. This document will establish design standards, overall theme, wall and fence concepts, and pedestrian connectivity to be used in the future build out of this project. This Planned Unit Development (PUD) is being processed in conformance with City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code, Chapter 9.03.060.

2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND & DESCRIPTION
Gateway Heights is located north of Jennings Court and east of Morton Road in the City of Moreno Valley (Refer to Exhibit A – Vicinity Map). The property contains 32.70 acres in the foothill of the Box Springs Mountain Reserve Park. The project proposes to develop approx. 16.59 acres of 32.56 acres into 108 detached condominium units with the dwelling units in an 8-unit “cluster” concept. (See Exhibit B – Development Area) The remaining 15.97 acres will be rezoned to Open Space (OS). It is anticipated that the open space area will be incorporated into the local trail system of hiking, trail running, and mountain biking trails, and the open space area will be available for recreational use by residents of Gateway Heights and the City of Moreno Valley. The project will also contain 3.1 acres of open space, trails and park area within the community providing residents with space to enjoy. The project proposal is consistent with the City of Moreno Valley’s Residential 10 (R10) District which allows for a maximum density of 10 dwelling units per net acre. In order to ensure the quality and cohesiveness of PUD projects, the City of Moreno Valley requires additional design details during planning stages. The requirement for these design standards and details helps ensure that City design objectives are met. By implementing the following design points, this project meets these City design objectives for PUDs:
• Provides innovation and diversity in housing choices that would not otherwise be possible according to the strict application of the site development regulations in this title because the detached condominium concept provides its residents with the benefits of single-family homeownership while also conferring on them the benefits of shared community living. • Provides access to adjacent natural resources, open space, onsite recreational facilities through the dedication of nearly one-half of the property to open space that will interconnect with a regional trail system.
• Installation of storm water pollution control systems pursuant to the municipal storm water permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB).

F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2394 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 7 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS
The property is currently unimproved land bordered to the south by an existing single family residential development. The site lies just to the east of Interstate 215 and to the north of the US 60/I-215 interchange. The site had previously been entitled for a single-family residential development (Tract 33626) in 2007 but those entitlements expired.

The topography of this site has two naturally defined areas. The lower lying area, which generally contains slopes under 15% and the mountainous area which consists of slopes greater than 25%. The site generally slopes from northeast to southwest (See Exhibit C – USGS Topographic Map). The property is located within Flood Zone ‘X’ (areas determined to be outside of the 100-year and 500-year floodplain) Refer to Exhibit D – FIRM Map (Map No. 06065C0733G, dated August 28, 2008).

Per the General Plan, the property currently has land use designations of Residential Max 2DU/AC (R2) and Hillside Residential (HR). (Refer to Exhibit E – General Plan Map and Exhibit F – Zoning Map) Transportation corridors and area circulation will be developed in conformance with the City of Moreno Valley’s General Plan. Refer to Exhibit G – Area Circulation Map for a representation of the major roadways in the areas of the subject site.

4.0 RELATIONSHIP TO SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
The surrounding properties in the area include vacant land, existing single-family homes, and hillside. A majority of the vacant land adjacent to this project are contained within the Gateway Center Specific Plan, in the unincorporated area of Riverside County, to the west of the project. This Specific Plan contains densities from 5du/acre to 16du/acre as well as a school site bordering Morton Road to the west. (See Exhibit H – Gateway Specific Plan) To the north and east are areas zoned as Hillside Residential in the City of Moreno Valley and Conservation in the County of Riverside, to the east and south of the project there are eight existing single-family homes. (See Exhibit I – Surrounding Jurisdictions)
The surrounding General Plan land use designations are as follows:

North: Hillside Residential (HR) & Conservation (County of Riverside) South: Residential Max. 5du/acre (R5)
East: Hillside Residential (HR)
West: Gateway Center Specific Plan (County of Riverside)

The surrounding existing land uses are as follows:

North: Vacant
South: Single Family Residences
East: Vacant
West: Vacant
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2395 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 8 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

5.0 PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Gateway Heights development is intended as a planned residential community offering innovative cluster housing options in the lower lying portion of the site and open space on the remainder of the site. The development will include a community park, open space and a common community design identity. This development plan coupled with the unique location of this property will provide multiple housing alternatives for both entry-level buyers, young families, and retirees, as well as student and faculty for the University of California-Riverside.

As mentioned above, the R10 designated area of Gateway Heights will be clustered on 16.59 acres of the property and will contain 108 units located near the center of the development area. This gives the property a density of 3.37 units per acre with a clustered density of 6.51 units per acre. This density is well within allowances of the proposed General Plan designation of R10 (10 units per net acre). The remaining 15.97 acres will be changed to Open Space (OS) and designated for conservation. In addition to the open space, the project will also provide a 0.89 acre community park located in the center of the development. (Refer to Exhibit J – Open Space/Park Plan) The residential uses within the Gateway Heights development will consist of cluster units in varying sizes ranging from 4-unit to 10-unit clusters. This development will be subject to the requirements in Chapter

9.03.040 (Residential Site Development Standards) and 9.03.060 (Planned Unit Developments) of the City of Moreno Valley’s municipal code.

5.1 Cluster Design
These units will contain 4-unit to 10-unit auto court product on pad sizes ranging from 7,674SF to 16,254SF. (Refer to Exhibit K – Cluster Detail) These cluster units are arranged with garages facing a common driveway as to enhance the aesthetic views of the project from the street and perimeter. The purpose of this design concept is to ensure architectural continuity and compatibility throughout the project utilizing the following design criteria:
 Provide front door access to open space/courtyard for inside units and street access for outside units.
 Provide garage access at common private street
 Use enhanced elevations for homes facing the public street.  Provide patios or balconies to enhance architectural styles and increase private open space.
 Consider additional building articulation through recessed garage doors, recessing or cantilevering second stories and varying roof pitches. (Refer to A-1.3 thru A-3.4 – Conceptual Floor Plans/Elevations) F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2396 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 9 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

5.2 Alternative Design Standards
This planned unit development for the Gateway Heights project contains various design alternatives that differ from the standard R10 design standards in order to promote the objectives stated above in Section 2. As allowed in the City of Moreno Valley’s Municipal Code Section 9.03.060.G, planned unit developments may deviate from the site development standards set forth in the applicable zoning district regarding lot area, lot dimensions, lot coverage, setbacks and building height.

5.2.1 Lot Coverage
The Gateway Heights project contains 13 development pad areas varying in size from 7,674 to 16,254 square feet. The cluster development will be exclusively contained within these development pads and the pads will have a maximum building coverage of 65%. The remaining pad area shall contain driveways, sidewalks and landscaping.

5.2.2 Building Setbacks
Front/Street Side setback = 5’ to ROW
Minimum building separation = 6’
Side setback to toe/top of slope = 5’ Min*
Rear setback to toe/top of slope = 5’ Min*
*-For buildings located at the top or toe of slope, the minimum building setback shall be determined by the California Building Code Section 1808.7 which states that buildings at the toe of slope shall be at least the smaller of H/2 or 15’ from the toe of slope.

Buildings at the top of slope shall be at least the smaller of H/3 or 40’ from the top of slope.

Example: 20’ Slope Height = 10’ setback at toe of slope (20/2) 20’ Slope Height = 7’ setback at top of slope (20/3)
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2397 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 10 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

5.2.3 Building Height
Building heights for the two story units will not exceed 30’ in height.

5.2.4 Street Sections
The streets within the Gateway Heights PUD will be private streets maintained by the project’s Homeowner Association. These streets will be constructed based on the City of Moreno Valley’s Local Street section MVSI-107A-0. Street A and Street C will be constructed using a modified section which eliminates the sidewalk and landscape area along the project perimeter. The purpose for these modified sections is to preserve the natural landscape along the perimeter of the project. With the elimination of these sidewalks, a pedestrian crossing has been located at approximately mid-block of Street B to provide ADA access to the units on the north side of Street B. (Refer to Exhibit L – Street Section Details)
TABLE 1

5.3 Fire Protection Plan
The Gateway Heights project has developed a Fire Protection Plan in conjunction with the development to increase safety measures and mitigate any fire hazards for the project. The mitigations include providing two 36’+ wide roadways at the entrance to minimize any potential traffic congestion during an emergency setting. One roadway would be used for ingress and the other for egress. The site also includes an internal looped road system allowing traffic circulation in either direction. Direct access shall be provided to all structures and no dead-end fire apparatus access roads are contained onsite. The project has also developed a Preliminary Fuel Modification and Vegetation Management plan for the site which includes requirements for landscape materials to reduce non-fire-resistant vegetation. (Refer to Appendix 1) A Final Fuel Modification Plan will be required as part of the Final Design submittals for approval prior to obtaining a Grading Permit.

GATEWAY HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Max Building Height 30'
Min Front/Street Setback 5'
Min Bldg seperation 6'
Min. Side setbacks 5'*
Min. Rear setbacks 5'*
Max Development Pad Coverage 65%
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2398 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 11 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

5.4 Community Park & Landscape Buffers
This project will contain a community park space area, approximately 0.89 acres in size and with various elements for recreation. This community park will be located near the center to the subdivision allowing easy access to all residents. This park space may contain amenities such as BBQ and picnic areas, ramadas, tot lot, dog park and turf areas for additional gathering and activities. The park will be owned and maintained by the project’s Homeowners Association. In addition to the community park, this project will also incorporate landscaped buffer areas throughout the project and along the project’s perimeter. These landscape areas will also be maintained by the Homeowners Association and subject to the requirements of the Fire Protection Plan.

5.4.1 General Guidelines
 All landscape shall conform to Ordinance No. 859.2 and County of Riverside Guide to California Friendly Landscaping.
 All planting areas shall be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system and an ET based controller, per Ordinance 859.2.
 All planting areas shall receive three inches (3”) of shredded bark mulch and one and a half inches (1-1/2”) on ground cover from flats.
 All trees within six feet (6’) of any hardscape shall receive thirty-six inch (36”) deep, by twenty inch (20”) long linear root barrier.
 All slopes three feet (3’) in vertical height or greater shall be planted with shrubs and trees and irrigated per the Riverside County requirements for slope erosion control landscaping. Slopes to meet building and safety requirements.  Landscaping shall consist of a combination of trees, shrubs and groundcover as listed in the California Friendly Plant List provided by the County.

5.5 Entry Monuments, Walls & Project Theme
The primary entry for the community will be located at the intersection of “Street A” and Morton Road. The elevated topography of the Gateway Heights project will make it a predominant development near the I-215 freeway. As such, it is important to minimize the walls and fences that could impact the views from the street or surrounding areas. The Gateway Heights project will contain no walls on the interior of the project. The perimeter of the project will consist of decorative view walls and/ or tubular steel fencing. Perimeter wall and fence materials, designs, and colors will carry on the project’s theme established by the project’s monument signage and landscaping. Wall and fence heights will be limited to a maximum height of six (6) feet, except where necessary for noise attenuation or additional retaining wall. Decorative pillars and pedestals may extend up to an additional fourteen (14) inches above the maximum wall or fence heights. (Refer to Exhibit M – Conceptual Wall & Fence Plan) Materials, colors, and construction methods for theme, view and accent walls are F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2399 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 12 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group
subject to some variation, so long as the proposed character and theme of the walls is preserved and per the approval of the Planning Department.

While in some areas of the development, units may have retaining walls the majority of the development will not be separated by neighborhood walls at the rear or side yards.

5.5.1 General Guidelines
 All walls and fences should maintain a six foot (6’) maximum height limit, except where larger walls are necessary for noise attenuation or retaining purposes.  If walls or fences end in a pilaster, the design of the pilaster should reflect the shape of the supports used in the entry monuments and use similar materials.  When changes in pad elevation occur, the wall or fence should be stepped in equal vertical intervals.
 Where gates are required, they shall be constructed of wrought iron, vinyl or tubular steel. Chain link fencing is not permitted. All construction must be of good quality and sufficient durability. (Applicants shall provide specifications which shall be approved by the Planning Department)
 All wall and fence plans and materials must conform to City of Moreno Valley guidelines.

5.6 Perimeter Yard Landscaping
Perimeter yard landscaping is required around all cluster pads and unless approved by the Planning Department, will be provided by the developer/home builder. Perimeter yard landscaping provided by the developer/builder or their representative must be installed within one month of closing of the first unit. A variety of perimeter yard landscape packages with automatic irrigation systems shall be provided; landscaping designs with berming, river run features, courtyards, lighting, or other creative features shall be offered for standard landscape design.

F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2400 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 13 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group
Figure 1 - Galvanized steel rock garden
wall

5.7 Private Open Space
Private Open Space may include land within each
residential unit that is available for private use. This private open space is typically considered yard, patio or balcony area that is available for private recreation. It is recognized that while the community park provides an
easily accessible active recreational opportunity for all residents of the development, each residence must have
adequate private outdoor space that can be an effective extension of the indoor living space and be used for
passive outdoor activities such as gardening, reading,
eating and barbequing. Per Moreno Valley Municipal Code Section 9.03.040.G.8, each unit shall have at least one hundred and fifty (150) square feet of private open space.

This open space may be achieved through the use of patio or balcony spaces. First floor patio space shall have a minimum dimension of 8’ and upstairs balconies must have a minimum dimension of 5’. Patio designs may include alternatives to traditional fencing, such as garden walls, small retaining walls or landscaping which delineates the space between units.

F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2401 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 14 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

EXHIBITS
F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2402 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2403
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2404
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) USGS MAP MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA united engineering group GATEWAY HEIGHTS EXHIBIT C F.1.i Packet Pg. 2405 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) SUBJECT SITE FEMA MAP MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA united engineering group GATEWAY HEIGHTS EXHIBIT D F.1.i Packet Pg. 2406 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2407
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.i
Packet Pg. 2408
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) INTERSTATE CALIFORNIA 215 60 BOX SPRIN
GS R
O

AD MORTON ROAD

DAY STREET

CENTRAL AVENUE

CENTRAL AVENUE

WATKINS DRIVE MA

RTIN LUTHER KING BLVD

CANYON CREST DR VI E

EL CERRITO DR

SYCAMORE

CANYON BLVD COUNT

RY CLUB DRIVE SUBJECT SITE
CAMPUS DRIVE CIRCULATION MAP MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA united engineering group GATEWAY HEIGHTS EXHIBIT G F.1.i Packet Pg. 2409 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) GATEWAY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA united engineering group GATEWAY HEIGHTS EXHIBIT H F.1.i Packet Pg. 2410 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 1 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) SUBJECT SITE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY CITY OF RIVERSIDE SURROUNDING JURISDICTIONS MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA united engineering group GATEWAY HEIGHTS EXHIBIT I F.1.j Packet Pg. 2411 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2412
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2413
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2414
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2415
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 28 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

FLOOR PLANS/ELEVATIONS
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2416 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) COPYRIGHT © 2019 KNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC
KNITTER PARTNERSINTERNATIONAL, INC.

KPI
architecture & planning
17752 MITCHELL NORTH, SUITE C
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-6802
949.752.1177 www.knitter.com
A-1.01

SHEET TITLE

SHEET NUMBER

PROJECT INFO
NO. DATE REVISIONSHEET ISSUE DATE:DRAWN BY:PROJECT MANAGER:PROJECT NUMBER:
3/29/22
SJW
MJK
21019
Henghou Group
177 E. Colorado BLVD, Ste. 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
Gateway Heights
Moreno Valley, USA
Tuesday, March 29, 2022, 11:40 AM, g:2021:21019 - Henghou Group - Gateway Hts - Moreno Valley:ARCHICAD:21019 - Moreno Valley Plan 1.pln, mac THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OFKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SHALL NOT BEUSED ON ANY OTHER WORK, BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSEDTO OTHERS EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROMKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PLAN 1

FLOOR PLAN A
KIT
11'-0 3/4" x 11'-7"
GAR
20'-4" x 20'-0"
PDR
5'-0" x 5'-6"
DIN
9'-11" x 10'-2"

GREAT RM
20'-0" x 12'-8 11/16"
50'-0"
21'-0"
615 sq ft
P

FIRST FLOOR
TOTAL 1400 sq ft
2 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATHS
BR 2
14'-6" x 12'-0"
9' CLG.

MBR
12'-0" x 14'-6"
9' CLG.

MBA
7'-8" x 7'-10"
9' CLG.

BA 2
5'-0 3/16" x 11'-6"
9' CLG.

LA
SECOND FLOOR 785 sq ft 1 PLAN 1A 1 0 2' 4' 8' PLAN 1A 0 2' 4' 8' F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2417
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) COPYRIGHT © 2019 KNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC
KNITTER PARTNERSINTERNATIONAL, INC.

KPI
architecture & planning
17752 MITCHELL NORTH, SUITE C
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-6802
949.752.1177 www.knitter.com
A-1.02

SHEET TITLE

SHEET NUMBER

PROJECT INFO
NO. DATE REVISIONSHEET ISSUE DATE:DRAWN BY:PROJECT MANAGER:PROJECT NUMBER:
3/29/22
SJW
MJK
21019
Henghou Group
177 E. Colorado BLVD, Ste. 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
Gateway Heights
Moreno Valley, USA
Tuesday, March 29, 2022, 11:40 AM, g:2021:21019 - Henghou Group - Gateway Hts - Moreno Valley:ARCHICAD:21019 - Moreno Valley Plan 1.pln, mac THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OFKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SHALL NOT BEUSED ON ANY OTHER WORK, BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSEDTO OTHERS EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROMKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PLAN 1

FLOOR PLAN B
KIT
11'-0 3/4" x 11'-7"
GAR
20'-4" x 20'-0"
PDR
5'-0" x 5'-6"
DIN
9'-11" x 10'-2"

GREAT RM
20'-0" x 12'-8 11/16"
50'-0"
21'-0"
615 sq ft
P

FIRST FLOOR
TOTAL 1400 sq ft
2 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATHS
BR 2
14'-6" x 12'-0"
9' CLG.

MBR
12'-0" x 14'-6"
9' CLG.

MBA
7'-8" x 7'-10"
9' CLG.

BA 2
5'-0 3/16" x 11'-6"
9' CLG.

LA
SECOND FLOOR 785 sq ft 1 PLAN 1B 1 0 2' 4' 8' PLAN 1B 0 2' 4' 8' F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2418
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2419
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2420
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) COPYRIGHT © 2019 KNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC
KNITTER PARTNERSINTERNATIONAL, INC.

KPI
architecture & planning
17752 MITCHELL NORTH, SUITE C
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-6802
949.752.1177 www.knitter.com
A-2.1

SHEET TITLE

SHEET NUMBER

PROJECT INFO
NO. DATE REVISIONSHEET ISSUE DATE:DRAWN BY:PROJECT MANAGER:PROJECT NUMBER:
3/22/22
SJW
MJK
21019
Henghou Group
177 E. Colorado BLVD Ste. 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
Gateway Heights
Moreno Valley, USA
Tuesday, March 22, 2022, 2:16 PM, g:2021:21019 - Henghou Group - Gateway Hts - Moreno Valley:ARCHICAD:21019 - Moreno Valley Plan 2.pln, mac THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OFKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SHALL NOT BEUSED ON ANY OTHER WORK, BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSEDTO OTHERS EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROMKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PLAN 2
FLOOR PLAN 2A
KIT
11'-3 13/16" x 11'-2 11/16"
GAR
20'-4" x 20'-0"
PDR
5'-0" x 5'-6"
DIN
8'-8 3/16" x 9'-0 11/16"

GREAT RM
20'-0" x 12'-9 5/16"
9' CLG.
50'-0"
21'-0"
615 sq ft
P

FIRST FLOOR
TOTAL 1500 sq ft
3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATHS
MBR
12'-0" x 14'-6"
9' CLG.

MBA
7'-8" x 7'-10 1/4"
9' CLG.

BA 2
5'-0 3/16" x 10'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 2
9'-10" x 11'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 3
9'-10" x 11'-0"
9' CLG.

LA
SECOND FLOOR 885 sq ft 2 PLAN 2A 2 0 2' 4' 8' PLAN 2A 0 2' 4' 8' F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2421
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) COPYRIGHT © 2019 KNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC
KNITTER PARTNERSINTERNATIONAL, INC.

KPI
architecture & planning
17752 MITCHELL NORTH, SUITE C
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-6802
949.752.1177 www.knitter.com
A-2.2

SHEET TITLE

SHEET NUMBER

PROJECT INFO
NO. DATE REVISIONSHEET ISSUE DATE:DRAWN BY:PROJECT MANAGER:PROJECT NUMBER:
3/22/22
SJW
MJK
21019
Henghou Group
177 E. Colorado BLVD Ste. 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
Gateway Heights
Moreno Valley, USA
Tuesday, March 22, 2022, 2:16 PM, g:2021:21019 - Henghou Group - Gateway Hts - Moreno Valley:ARCHICAD:21019 - Moreno Valley Plan 2.pln, mac THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OFKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SHALL NOT BEUSED ON ANY OTHER WORK, BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSEDTO OTHERS EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROMKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PLAN 2
FLOOR PLAN 2B
KIT
11'-3 13/16" x 11'-2 11/16"
GAR
20'-4" x 20'-0"
PDR
5'-0" x 5'-6"
DIN
8'-8 3/16" x 9'-0 11/16"

GREAT RM
20'-0" x 12'-9 5/16"
9' CLG.
50'-0"
21'-0"
615 sq ft
P

FIRST FLOOR
TOTAL 1500 sq ft
3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATHS
MBR
12'-0" x 14'-6"
9' CLG.

MBA
7'-8" x 7'-10 1/4"
9' CLG.

BA 2
5'-0 3/16" x 10'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 2
9'-10" x 11'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 3
9'-10" x 11'-0"
9' CLG.

LA
SECOND FLOOR 885 sq ft 1 PLAN 2B 2 0 2' 4' 8' PLAN 2B 0 2' 4' 8' F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2422
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2423
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2424
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) COPYRIGHT © 2019 KNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC
KNITTER PARTNERSINTERNATIONAL, INC.

KPI
architecture & planning
17752 MITCHELL NORTH, SUITE C
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-6802
949.752.1177 www.knitter.com
A-3.01

SHEET TITLE

SHEET NUMBER

PROJECT INFO
NO. DATE REVISIONSHEET ISSUE DATE:DRAWN BY:PROJECT MANAGER:PROJECT NUMBER:
3/22/22
SJW
MJK
21019
Henghou Group
177 E. Colorado BLVD, Ste. 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
Gateway Heights
Moreno Valley, USA
Tuesday, March 22, 2022, 2:14 PM, g:2021:21019 - Henghou Group - Gateway Hts - Moreno Valley:ARCHICAD:21019 - Moreno Valley Plan 3.pln, mac THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OFKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SHALL NOT BEUSED ON ANY OTHER WORK, BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSEDTO OTHERS EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROMKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PLAN 3

FLOOR PLAN A
DIN
9'-0" x 9'-0"
PDR
5'-0" x 5'-6"
KIT
11'-0" x 11'-2"

GREAT RM
20'-0" x 12'-10"
9' CLG.

GAR
20'-4" x 20'-0"
21'-0"
50'-0"
FIRST FLOOR 615 sq ft
TOTAL 1602 sq ft
3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATHS
P
MBR
12'-0" x 13'-6"
9' CLG.

MBA
7'-8" x 12'-6"
9' CLG.

BA 2
5'-0" x 10'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 2
9'-10" x 12'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 3
9'-10" x 11'-0"
9' CLG.

LA
9'-6" x 6'-0"
SECOND FLOOR 987 sq ft 3 PLAN 3A 3 0 2' 4' 8' PLAN 3A 0 2' 4' 8' F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2425
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) COPYRIGHT © 2019 KNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC
KNITTER PARTNERSINTERNATIONAL, INC.

KPI
architecture & planning
17752 MITCHELL NORTH, SUITE C
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614-6802
949.752.1177 www.knitter.com
A-3.02

SHEET TITLE

SHEET NUMBER

PROJECT INFO
NO. DATE REVISIONSHEET ISSUE DATE:DRAWN BY:PROJECT MANAGER:PROJECT NUMBER:
3/22/22
SJW
MJK
21019
Henghou Group
177 E. Colorado BLVD, Ste. 200
Pasadena, CA 91105
Gateway Heights
Moreno Valley, USA
Tuesday, March 22, 2022, 2:14 PM, g:2021:21019 - Henghou Group - Gateway Hts - Moreno Valley:ARCHICAD:21019 - Moreno Valley Plan 3.pln, mac THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OFKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SHALL NOT BEUSED ON ANY OTHER WORK, BE REPRODUCED OR DISCLOSEDTO OTHERS EXCEPT BY WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROMKNITTER PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

PLAN 3

FLOOR PLAN B
DIN
9'-0" x 9'-0"
PDR
5'-0" x 5'-6"
KIT
11'-0" x 11'-2"

GREAT RM
20'-0" x 12'-10"
9' CLG.

GAR
20'-4" x 20'-0"
21'-0"
50'-0"
FIRST FLOOR 615 sq ft
TOTAL 1602 sq ft
3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATHS
P
MBR
12'-0" x 13'-6"
9' CLG.

MBA
7'-8" x 12'-6"
9' CLG.

BA 2
5'-0" x 10'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 2
9'-10" x 12'-0"
9' CLG.

BR 3
9'-10" x 11'-0"
9' CLG.

LA
9'-6" x 6'-0"
SECOND FLOOR 987 sq ft 3 PLAN 3B 3 0 2' 4' 8' PLAN 3B 0 2' 4' 8' F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2426
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2427
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2428
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 41 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

SITE PLAN
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2429 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040 APN: 256-150-039 APN: 256-150-038 APN: 256-150-037 APN: 256-040-012
(GATEWAY CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN)
APN: 256-160-017
APN: 256-160-002
(VACANT)
APN: 256-040-009
APN: 256-030-012
(VACANT)

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

MORTON ROAD

JENNINGS COURT
HILLMER COURT BASIN BBASIN A OPEN SPACE 15.97 ACRES PARK 0.89 ACRES 12,852SF PAD 1 PAD 2 12,852SF 12,852SF
PAD 3
PAD 4 12,852SF
PAD 5 16,254SF
PAD 6 12,852SF
PAD 7 7,674SF
PAD 8 12,852SF
PAD 9 16,254SF
PAD 10 16,254SF
PAD 11 16,254SF
PAD 12 12,852SF PAD 13 15,132SF BSL STREET A STREET B STREET C 38' 8885 Haven Avenue Suite 195 united engineering group Phone: 909.466.9240 CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, www.unitedeng.com IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

SITE PLAN (PEN21-0066)
BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA., INC DECEMBER 2022
UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA, INC OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLAN PREPARER SHIZAO ZHENG GENERAL NOTES: SURROUNDING LAND USE SITE DATA UTILITY PURVEYORS: LEGEND VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN GATEWAY HEIGHTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PEN21-0066 PROJECT LAND USE SITE LOCATION 215 60 GERNERT RD 215 FAIR AISLE DR JENNINGS CT PENUNURI PL TENNYSON RD BOX SPRINGS ROAD

CLARK ST
MORTON RD PAL FOXIA PL 142' DEVELOPER: JASON ACKERMAN F.1.j Packet Pg. 2430
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C
APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040
APN: 256-150-039
APN: 256-150-038
APN: 256-150-037 APN: 256-040-012 (GATEWAY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN) APN: 256-160-017 APN: 256-160-002 (VACANT) APN: 256-040-009 (VACANT)
APN: 256-030-012
(VACANT) CITY OF MORENO VALLEY COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

MORTON ROAD

JENNING COURT

HILLMER COURT

OPEN SPACE

15.4 ACRES
A
A
C
C
B
B
8885 Haven Avenue
Suite 195
united engineering group
Phone: 909.466.9240
CA 91730
Rancho Cucamonga,
www.unitedeng.com
IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN (PEN21-0066)
BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA., INC DECEMBER 2022

VICINITY MAP

PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN

GATEWAY HEIGHTS

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PEN21-0066
LEGEND
GENERAL NOTES:

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER

ESTIMATED EARTHWORK

QUANTITIES (RAW)
LGC GEO-ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

SITE LOCATION
215
60 GERNERT RD
215

FAIR AISLE DR

JENNINGS CT PENUNURI PL

TENNYSON RD

BOX SPRINGS ROAD CLARK ST MORTON RD

PAL FOXIA PL
142'
UTILITY PURVEYORS:

UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA, INC

ENGINEER/PLAN PREPARER
OWNER/APPLICANT:

SHIZAO ZHENG
DEVELOPER:

JASON ACKERMAN
PROJECT DISTURBANCE:

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2431 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 44 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

6.0 ARCHITECTURE
The architectural guidelines in this manual have been developed to ensure architectural continuity and compatibility throughout the project; to promote a distinctive architectural theme; and to avoid a mundane repetition of too similar architectural design elements. These guidelines will provide a set of basic concepts for development but are not meant to limit future creativity in design.

These styles and concepts should be incorporated to provide a variety of quality housing types.

6.1 General Guidelines
The following general guidelines should be considered in the designing and layout of the project:
 A common set of design style and design elements should be included throughout the project.
 Long unarticulated building facades should be avoided  Natural building materials should be varied throughout the project, avoiding long stretches of similar street scene
 Offset roof planes, columns, vertical and horizontal articulation or other projecting architectural features shall occur on those facades of the residence that are visible from the street or open space
 The visual impact of garages shall be reduced to the maximum extent practicable

6.2 Architectural styles
Two architectural styles have been set forth as examples in this document to begin to identify and illustrate the intent and objective of these design guidelines in terms of architectural style and variety. Santa Barbara and Modern Farmhouse architectural styles are discussed in the following pages and depicted in Figures 1 & 2 to establish the types and level of architectural detail which will assist in achieving the project design objectives. Discussions of each of these styles as well as illustrations of typical elevations and features are located on the following pages.

6.2.1 Santa Barbara
Santa Barbara style is an architectural and interior design style derived from Mediterranean and Spanish-revival architecture, often characterized by deep red tones and polished wood textures that contrast with stark white walls.

Santa Barbara style architecture and interior design are characterized by white stucco walls, exposed beam ceilings, red-tile roofs and floors, arcades, and courtyards.

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2432 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 45 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group
Features typical of the Santa Barbara style include:
o White stucco walls
o Exposed beam ceilings
o Tile roofs
o Shutters
o Decorative Vents

6.2.2 Modern Farmhouse
The Modern farmhouse style combines practical elements (simple floor plan, white walls) with rustic materials (wood floors, hand-hewn beams, and wrought-iron hardware). And you’ll see this style throughout the U.S., with regional variations. For example, you might spot a Dutch door or two in a New England farmhouse, or wraparound porches on homes in the Deep South
Features typical of the Modern Farmhouse style include:
o Reclaimed wood
o Barnboard details
o Wrought iron accents
o Wide plank floors
o Rafter Tails
o Stone Veneers
Figure 1 – Santa Barbara
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2433 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 46 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

7.0 UTILITIES
Currently the site is undeveloped and the site does contain some existing overhead electrical lines as well as water and sewer lines located in Morton Rd. All existing and new onsite utilities that will serve the subject site will be placed underground except as approved by Public Works. Operation and maintenance of all utilities and facilities will be managed by the appropriate operating entity upon approval and completion of construction. Sewer facilities, water facilities, streetlights, and fire hydrants will be provided according to the appropriate agency’s guidelines, per the recommendations of Public Works and City of Moreno Valley Fire Departments and other governmental regulations applicable to the construction of various facilities.

Utility Providers
Services Provider Location
Electrical Southern California Edison At site
Telephone Spectrum TBD
Cable Spectrum TBD
Natural Gas Southern California Gas Company TBD
Water Eastern Municipal Water District At site
Sanitary Sewer Eastern Municipal Water District At site Fire & Emergency City of Moreno Valley Fire Dept TBD
Figure 2 – Modern Farmhouse
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2434 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 47 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group

8.0 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (CC&R’S)
Table 8-1 below details the maintenance responsibilities for the various utilities and common areas within Gateway Heights. A majority of the common areas will be maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). The HOA will be established in conjunction with development of the project. CC&R's for Gateway Heights that include language for the establishment of a HOA and provisions for creation of liens in conjunction with the HOA, for maintenance funding, will be provided prior to recordation of the final map.

MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY
Table 8-1
Home Owners
Association
City of Moreno
Valley
Riverside County
Flood Control
Eastern Municipal
Water District
Onsite Storm Drain X
Basin A X
Basin B X
Line B
(across Morton Rd) X
Headwalls X
Water X
Sewer X
Streets X
Landscaping X
Entry Monuments X
Paseos & Parkways X
Park X
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2435 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Gateway Heights 48 Planned Unit Development
United Engineering Group
APPENDIX 1

FIRE PROTECTION TECHNICAL REPORT
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2436 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
To: Douglas Bloom, Fire Marshal, Moreno Valley Fire Department From: Dudek Fire Protection Planning Team, Michael Huff, Director Subject: Gateway Heights Project Fire Hazard Analysis and Approach Date: 01/30/2023
cc: Jason Ackerman, Esq., Ackerman Law
Attachment(s): Figures 1-2
Attachment 1 – Site Aerial Photograph
Attachment 2 – Fuel Modification Plan
Attachment 3 -- Site Plan with Revised Dual Project Access This Technical Fire Protection Memorandum documents fire protection planning related to project constraints analysis for the subject project. The approach outlined herein responds to your recommended direction during several meetings and communications regarding the site and its required fire protection features, including emergency ingress/egress to/from the project site and defensible space areas.

Project description
The proposed Gateway Heights development is a 108 unit detached townhouse project on an approximately 33- acre site in the City of Moreno Valley.
• “Detached townhouses” (townhouses by CBC definition are attached; structures are likely to be considered SFDs per code1)
• Structures are separated 6’ apart.
• Structures are two-story townhouses
• Proposed 16-acre open space lot north of the developed project site 1 2022 California Building Code, Chapter 2: Definitions, Section 202 Definitions F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2437 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 2
JANUARY 2023
Existing Site Observations
Onsite
• Attachment 1 provides a site aerial photograph.
• Vegetation is primarily scattered sage scrub, forbs, and scattered native shrubs and a few ornamental trees in the northeast corner;
• Unmaintained roads/trails traverse the property;
• Evidence of recent fuel reduction activities are present on site.

Topography
The project site is relatively flat, with a slight upslope gradient to the north; beyond the project to the north is a steep, rocky hillside with sparse scrub and forb vegetation. To the west and south the terrain has gently rolling hills with intermittent drainages. Along the eastern edge of the property is a drainage channel strewn with boulders. To the east of the project is a residential subdivision.

Vicinity
The project is located in the northeast area of the City of Moreno Valley. The western and northern property lines coincide with the city limits; the lands immediately to the west and north of the property are within unincorporated Riverside County.
• North: open space;
• East of northern open space lot: open space;
• Southeast of project site: residential development;
• West: open space.

Proposed site plan review / code compliance issues
Issues to address:
• Driveway lengths: proposed lengths are all less than 150 feet in length and are 24’ wide.

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2438 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 3
JANUARY 2023
• Hose pull distances: will be greater than 150’ distance to two or more units along the driveways for Pads 2, 5, 7 and 9 through 13. However, the fire code official is authorized to increase the 150-foot distance since all units will be equipped throughout with automatic fire sprinkler systems.2 • Fuel modification width: 100-foot FMZ can be provided for most units (Attachment 2). The western most units on Pad 13 (NW corner) are 30 feet from the property line; the units on Pad 7 are 69 feet from the property line; The proposed FMZ reduction has been mitigated with placement of non-combustible walls along the property line adjacent to these two buildings as depicted in Attachment 2.

Primary access
Primary access is proposed using Morton Road on the southern side of the project, which has access to Box Springs Road and the SR60/I-215 Freeway.

Secondary access
In reviewing the Moreno Valley Fire Code, there is no reference identified whereby a secondary access is required for the project. CFC 503.1.2 authorizes the fire code official to require more than one access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road, but it does not require that an additional access road must be provided.

The project design provides two 36’ foot wide roadways at the entrance to minimize any potential traffic congestion during an emergency setting; one for ingress and one for egress (see Attachment 3). Each entrance roadway connects to separate “legs” of the internal circulation loop road allowing for approximately half of the occupants to exit in each of two distinct directions without conflict. Based on discussions with the FD, the proposed loop road design with a dual widened roadway entrance meets the intent of the code and will be accepted.

Internal circulation
• Loop road system;
• Direct access is provided to all structures;
• Unobstructed internal circulation loop roadway width of 24 feet; Fuel modification and Vegetation Management
A preliminary fuel modification landscape plan has been prepared and submitted for review and approval.

The two “legs” of the internal circulation loop road, along the eastern and western edges of the project, will be located between the property line and structures providing a paved, non-combustible, defensible space as part of the fuel modification zone.

The project will also comply with the following requirements related to fuel modification and vegetation management outlined in the 2022 California Fire Code. The Project-provided fuel modification landscape plan provides additional details on the Project’s consistency with these requirements and has been submitted for review 2 CFC Sec. 503.1.1, Exception 1.1
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2439 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 4
JANUARY 2023
to Moreno Valley Fire Department (MVFD). Fencing, decking and/or mulch will be consistent with requirements for fire hazard severity zones and WUI areas, specifics of which will be included in the project’s landscape plan and will be to MVFD approval.

CFC 4903.2.1.2 Final Fire Protection Plan and Ongoing Maintenance The project HOA is legally responsible for the maintenance of Fuel Modification Zones. HOA maintenance responsibilities concerning Fuel Modification Zones will be incorporated into the HOA’s covenants, conditions, and responsibilities (CC&Rs) to the approval of the MVFD.

CFC 4906.1 General
Planting of vegetation for new landscaping shall be selected to reduce non-fire-resistant vegetation in proximity to a structure and to maintain vegetation as it matures.

CFC 4906.2 Application
All new plantings of vegetation in State Responsibility Areas (SRA) and Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone shall comply with Sections 4906.3 through 4906.5.3.

CFC 4906.3 Landscape Plans
Landscape plans shall be provided when required by the enforcing agency. The landscape plan shall include development and maintenance requirements for the vegetation management zone adjacent to structures and roadways, and to provide significant fire hazard reduction benefits for public and firefighting safety.

CFC 4906.3.1 Contents
Landscape plans shall contain the following:

1. Delineation of the 30-foot (9144 mm) and 100-foot (30.5 m) fuel management zones from all structures.

2. Identification of existing vegetation to remain and proposed new vegetation.

3. Identification of irrigated areas.

4. A plant legend with both botanical and common names, and identification of all plant material symbols.

5. Identification of ground coverings within the 30-foot (9144 mm) zone.

CFC 4906.4 Vegetation
All new vegetation shall be fire-resistant vegetation in accordance with this section.

Exception: Trees classified as non-fire-resistant vegetation complying with Section 4906.4.2.1.

To be considered fire-resistant vegetation, it must meet at least one of the following:

1. Be identified as fire-resistant vegetation in an approved book, journal or listing from an approved organization.

2. Be identified as fire-resistant vegetation by a licensed landscape architect with supporting justification.

3. Plants considered fire-resistant vegetation and approved by the local enforcing agency.

CFC 4906.4.1 Shrubs
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2440 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 5
JANUARY 2023
All new plantings of shrubs shall comply with the following:

1. Shrubs shall not exceed 6 feet (1829 mm) in height.

2. Groupings of shrubs are limited to a maximum aggregate diameter of 10 feet (3048 mm).

3. Shrub groupings shall be separated from other groupings a minimum of 15 feet (4572 mm).

4. Shrub groupings shall be separated from structures a minimum of 30 feet (9144 mm).

5. Where shrubs are located below or within a tree's drip line, the lowest tree branch shall be a minimum of three times the height of the understory shrubs or 10 feet (3048 mm), whichever is greater.

CFC 4906.4.2 Trees
Trees shall be managed as follows within the 30-foot (9144 mm) zone of a structure:

1. New trees shall be planted and maintained so that the tree's drip line at maturity is a minimum of 10 feet (3048 mm) from any combustible structure.

2. The horizontal distance between crowns of new trees and crowns of adjacent trees shall not be less than 10 feet (3048 mm).

3. Existing trees shall be trimmed to provide a minimum separation of 10 feet (3048 mm) away from chimney and stovepipe outlets per Title 14, Section 1299.03.

CFC 4906.4.2.1 Non-Fire-Resistant Vegetation
New trees not classified as fire-resistant vegetation, such as conifers, palms, pepper trees and eucalyptus species, shall be permitted provided the tree is planted and maintained so that the tree's drip line at maturity is a minimum 30 feet (9144 mm) from any combustible structure.

Defensible Space
The project will comply with the following defensible space requirements outlined in the 2022 California Fire Code.

CFC 4907.1 General
Hazardous vegetation and fuels shall be managed to reduce the severity of potential exterior wildfire exposure to buildings and to reduce the risk of fire spreading to buildings as required by applicable laws and regulations.

Defensible space will be managed around all buildings and structures in State Responsibility Areas (SRA) as required in Public Resources Code 4291.

CFC 4907.2 Application
Buildings and structures located in the following areas shall maintain the required hazardous vegetation and fuel management:

1. All unincorporated lands designated by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection as a State Responsibility Area (SRA).

2. Land designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone by the Director.

3. Land designated in ordinance by local agencies as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone pursuant to Government Code Section 51179.

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2441 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 6
JANUARY 2023
CFC 4907.3 Requirements
Hazardous vegetation and fuels around all buildings and structures shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations:

1. Public Resources Code, Section 4291.

2. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 1.5, Chapter 7, Subchapter 3, Article 3, Section 1299.03.

3. California Government Code, Section 51182.

4. California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 7, Subchapter 1, Section 3.07.

Relevant code sections:

Chapter 7A of the 2022 California Building Code
All new Project buildings will comply with the ignition resistant construction requirements of California Building Code Chapter 7A. Per Chapter 7A, buildings located in any Fire Hazard Severity Zone or any Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fire Area designated by the enforcing agency constructed after the application date shall comply with Chapter 7A provisions. This includes all new buildings with residential, commercial, educational, institutional or similar occupancy type use, which are referred to as "applicable building(s)" (see definition in Section 702A), as well as new buildings and structures accessory to those applicable buildings The Project’s buildings will comply with the following construction and materials requirements identified in the following sections:
▪ 704A Ignition Resistant Construction
▪ 705A Roofing
▪ 706A Vents
▪ 707A Exterior Covering
▪ 708A Exterior Windows, Skylights and Doors
▪ 709A Decking
▪ 710A Accessory Buildings and Miscellaneous
California Residential Code R337. Materials and Construction Methods for Exterior Wildfire Exposure Minimum standards for a new building located in a WUI area to resist the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire.

California Residential Code R337.1.4. Inspection and Certification.

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2442 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 7
JANUARY 2023
The local building official shall, upon completion of construction, provide the owner or applicant with a copy of the final inspection report that demonstrates the building was constructed in compliance with all applicable state and local building standards, including those for materials and construction methods for wildfire exposure as described in this chapter. Issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the local building official for the proposed building shall be considered as complying with this section.

California Fire Code 503.1.2 Additional access.

Authorizes the fire code official to require more than one access road based on the potential for impairment of a single road, but it does not require that an additional access road must be provided.

Moreno Valley Fire Code Amendments
• 503.2.1 Fire apparatus access roads – 24 feet wide
• 903.2 Single Family Dwellings shall have automatic fire sprinkler systems • 4906.4 Fuel Modification Requirements for New Construction. Must meet the criteria established by Riverside County Fire Department (Information Bulletin #08-05). Submit a Fuel Modification Plan; indicate setback, irrigated and thinning zones (30’ Green Zone; 100’ total defensible space). • App B. Fire Flow and Hydrant Spacing
Fire environment assessment
The project site’s fire environment assessment was performed by Dudek fire protection planners with extensive similar experience throughout California over the last 25 years. • The site is located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone3. • At the time of the site assessment, there was no evidence of recent fire on site (no visible signs); fire history data4 indicates the site has had 77 fires within a five-mile radius and the site itself has burned four times since 1980 and most recently in 2001 (Watkins Fire).
• Vegetation on site and to the north, west and south is sparse and low growing, which would reduce the impacts from a wildland fire;
3 FRAP (Fire and Resource Assessment Program). 2008. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Hazard Severity Zones (Adopted in 2007). Accessed at: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/. 4 FRAP (Fire and Resource Assessment Program). 2020. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Fire Perimeters through 2020. Accessed at: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/.

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2443 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 8
JANUARY 2023
• Adjacent hillslopes to the north exist up and away from the project site. This reduces wildfire risks at the project site as wildfire is more likely to spread at slower rates when moving downslope compared to an upslope direction.
• The project may be subject to an approaching wildland fire from the northeast during Santa Ana wind conditions. While direct impacts from wildfire cannot be completely ruled out, structural ignition risks from ember cast are minimal given modern construction requirements in alignment with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code.

Fire Behavior assessment
• Selected fuel models Sh1 (low load, dry climate shrub) and Sh2 (moderate load, dry climate shrub) to represent the existing vegetative fuels. Site photographs provided in Attachment 4 depict the fuels present on and adjacent to the project site.
• Selected wildland fire run scenarios from the NE and SW representing an offshore Santa Ana wind event and an onshore wind event. Santa Ana wind events represent “worst-case” conditions and represent the highest wind speeds and lowest fuel moistures likely to occur at the project site. • Conducted fire behavior modeling using the BehavePlus 6 modeling system for existing conditions and post-development fuel modification (see results in Table 1). The location of model runs is provided in Figure

1. Table 1. Fire Behavior Modeling Results
Fire Scenarios
Flame
Length
(feet)
Fireline Intensity
(BTU/feet/second)
Spread
Rate
(mph)
Spotting
Distance
(miles)
Scenario 1: 15% slope, 40 mph NE wind
Fuel Model Sh1 (scrub/mustard) 8.4 584 1.0 0.7
Fuel Model Sh2 (scrub/mustard) 14.1 1,781 0.8 0.9
Scenario 1 Fuel Mod: 10% slope, 40 mph NE wind
Fuel Model 8 (irrigated landscaping) 2.6 46 0.1 0.3
Scenario 2: 15% slope, 20 mph SW wind
Fuel Model Sh1 (scrub/mustard) 8.5 589 1.0 0.7
Fuel Model Sh2 (scrub/mustard) 14.1 1,796 0.8 0.9
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2444 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 9
JANUARY 2023
Table 1. Fire Behavior Modeling Results
Fire Scenarios
Flame
Length
(feet)
Fireline Intensity
(BTU/feet/second)
Spread
Rate
(mph)
Spotting
Distance
(miles)
Scenario 2 Fuel Mod: 15% slope, 20 mph SW wind
Fuel Model 8 (irrigated landscaping) 2.6 46 0.1 0.3
An additional assessment was conducted to determine fire behavior during a Santa Ana wind event (worst-case weather conditions) in areas adjacent to the project site using the FlamMap software package. Direct impacts from wildfire are not likely at the project site due to flame lengths less than 20 feet in adjacent lands and the planned Fuel Modification Zones.

The following paragraphs provide descriptions of the inputs used in processing the FlamMap model. In addition, data sources are cited, and any assumptions made during the modeling process are described. A graphical representation of the model results is provided in Figure 2 Elevation
The elevation data file represents units of meters above mean sea level (AMSL). Elevations in the FlamMap analysis area range from 1,585 to 2,625 feet AMSL. Elevation data is a required input file for FlamMap runs and are necessary for adiabatic adjustment of temperature and humidity and for conversion of fire spread between horizontal and slope distances.

Slope
The slope data file represents values in degrees of inclination from horizontal. Slope values in the FlamMap analysis area range from 0–32 degrees. The slope input file is necessary for computing slope effects on fire spread and solar radiance.

Aspect
The aspect data file represents values in azimuth degrees. Aspect values are important in determining the solar exposure of grid cells.

Wind and Fuel Moisture
Wind speed and fuel moisture values for the FlamMap analysis utilized the same values as those used in the BehavePlus runs for Santa Ana weather scenarios. Wind and fuel moisture data was collected from local RAWS stations (Stations 045624 (Clark) and 045617 (Beaumont)). The FireFamilyPlus 6.0 software package was utilized to analyze local RAWS station data to empirically determine Santa Ana weather F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2445 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 10 JANUARY 2023
conditions representative of those which have occurred previously at the project location. Wind alignment and speeds were determined and set to 70 degrees and 40 mph respectively.

Fuel Model
The fuel model data file was based on the 40 Scott and Burgan (2005) models and represents distinct distributions of fuel loading found among surface fuel components (live and dead), size classes, and fuel types5.

Recommendations / Justification
Reduced/mitigated FMZs have been discussed and upon provisions for measures that provide the same practical effect, approved by the fire department. This Fire Protection Technical Report proposes the following approach and justification. The fire protection measures are evaluated to provide at least equivalent protection based on the experience of the preparers of this report.

1. Site fire environment and fire behavior is not significant. The vegetation on site and on adjacent lands is sparse – dried mustard and scattered sage. The ridge behind the project site slopes up and away from project, is covered with sparse light vegetation and rocks, which is beneficial.

2. Structures will be constructed in accordance with CRC R337 (Residential Code equivalent of CBC Chapter 7A) building codes (within FHSZ) and will include features such as ember resistant vents (baffled not just mesh).

3. FMZ will be provided around entire perimeter of the project site (see Fuel Modification Plan – Attachment 2). (Where the FMZ and Jurisdictional Delineation area overlaps along the upper portion of the southeastern property line, active fuel treatment will be conducted so as to avoid impacts. The channel is comprised of large boulders with limited vegetation and in its existing state acts as a fuel modification area.) The Project will be hardened throughout.
a. The Project shall attempt to obtain an interim off-site FMZ easement for Pads 7 and 13 so that a total of 100 feet of FMZ from the Project’s structures can be achieved. The off-site FMZ would be limited to thinning/mowing of existing vegetation annually. Should the off-site easement be infeasible based on an unwilling neighbor, then alternative fire protection is proposed:
i. Wherever less than 100 feet of FMZ (on and off site combined) is achievable, a 6-foot tall, masonry wall will be constructed at the property line in lieu of the additional FMZ. 5 Scott, Joe H. and Robert E. Burgan. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel’s surface fire spread model. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 72 p.

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2446 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 11 JANUARY 2023
Wall Justification: When buildings are set back from slopes, and a wall is placed at the property line, flames and radiant heat are deflected vertically reducing the effects of heat on the structure. If a structure cannot be setback adequately, or where the slope is less than 30%, a noncombustible wall can help deflect the flames from the structure6.The duration of radiant heat impact on the exposed side of the house is also reduced. The structure setback is important to avoid heat and/or flame intersection with the structure.

Heat-deflecting landscape walls of masonry construction that are six feet in height will be incorporated at the edge of lots where FMZs are the most constrained (Pads 7 and 13). The landscape walls provide a vertical, non-combustible surface in the line of heat, fumes, and flame. Once these fire byproducts intersect the wall, they are deflected upward or, in the case where lighter fuels are encountered, they are quickly consumed, heat and flame are absorbed or deflected by the wall, and the fuels burn peaks out within a short (30 second– 2 minute) time frame7.Walls like these have been observed to deflect heat and airborne embers on numerous wildfires in San Diego, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, and Santa Barbara County.

Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District, Laguna Beach Fire Department, Orange County Fire Authority, Murrieta Fire Protection District, and others utilize these walls as alternative methods based on observed performance during wildfires. This has led to these agencies approving use of non-combustible landscape walls as mitigations for reduced fuel modification zones and reduced setbacks at top of slope. While fuel moistures vary slightly across these jurisdictions, Santa Ana wind events create similar fuel moistures across a broad geographical area due to intensive drying of fuels. Therefore, this mitigation is also justified within the MVFD. These walls are consistent with NFPA 1144 Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fire – 2008 Edition, Section 5.1.3.3 and A.5.1.3.3 and International Urban Wildland Interface Code (ICC 2012). NFPA 1144, A.5.1.3.3 states:
“Noncombustible walls and barriers are effective for deflecting radiant heat and windblown embers from structures.” These walls and barriers are usually constructed of noncombustible materials (concrete block, bricks, stone, stucco) or earth where 30 feet (9 meters) of defensible space is not available.
ii. Those units on the west side of the Project that are unable to provide 100’ FMZ will be developed at a later date as Phase II after the adjacent development (Gateway Center) has removed the existing native vegetation as part of their grading phase.

4. Provide FMZ inspections annually. Inspections will be performed by RCFD or, at their preference, the Project would fund inspections by a 3rd party to their satisfaction. This measure will ensure that the FMZ is functioning as intended.

5. Identify and mark fire lane and/or no parking areas as required. 6 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 2005: Protecting Life and Property from Wildfire.

James C. Smalley, Editor.
7 Quarles and Beall. 2022. Proceedings of the California 2001 Wildfire Conference. Accessed at https://fireecology.org F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2447 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 12 JANUARY 2023

6. Provide enlarged turns at both internal loop roadway turns.

7. Dual pane (both panes) tempered glass for openings on exposed sides of the structures on Pads 7 and 13.

8. Loop internal road system with two 36-foot wide, multi-lane, physically separated ingress/egress roadways.

9. Hardening at Project access point via pavement and landscaping.

10. Fire access points at the terminus of each driveway along the north side of Project for firefighting.

Additionally, the area behind the northeast side of the project includes a 10-to-12-foot flat area that will be available to pedestrian firefighters via the provided accesses at the end of each driveway in that area.

Summary
The structures will be constructed following CRC R337 and CBC Chapter 7A requirements to ensure reduced ignition potential. In addition, hardening of the structures including enhanced vents and enhanced glazing requirements will be included on selected units as noted above and a noncombustible landscape wall will be placed to mitigate FMZ reductions.

The internal circulation provides the necessary access to all structures with fire department turnarounds required for any driveway greater than 150 feet. The minimum roadway width of 36 feet meets the requirements for buildings less than 30 feet in height. Hydrants will need to be installed within the project site.

The primary access off Morton Road has been enhanced to include two 36’ wide physically separated roadways for ingress and egress to reduce traffic congestion during emergencies, by providing dedicated ingress and egress routes.

F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2448 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 13 JANUARY 2023
Figures 1-2
F.1.j
Packet Pg. 2449 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 2 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Document Path: Z:\Projects\j1408800\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\FPP\FIG 4 BehavePlusAnalysisMap.mxd 0 250 500 1,000
Feet

SOURCE: AERIAL- BING MAPPING SERVICE; DEVELOPMENT- EDWIN SAMLIN 2021 Project Boundary
SCENARIO RUN #2
SCENARIO RUN #3
SCENARIO RUN #1
SCENARIO RUN #4
FIGURE1
BehavePlus Analysis Map
Fire Protection Plan for the Gateway Heights Project
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2450 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 60 60
215
215

Date: 10/19/2021 - Last saved by: lterry - Path: Z:\Projects\j1408800\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\FPP\FIG 1 Project Location.mxd Project Boundary
Banning
Beaumont
Brea
Calimesa
Canyon Lake
Carlsbad
Cathedral City
Claremont
tonCol
Corona
Dana Point
Del Mar
Desert
Hot Springs
Eastvale
Encinitas
Escondido
Fontana Grand Terrace
Hemet
Highland
Indian Wells
Irvine
Jurupa Valley
Laguna Niguel
Laguna Woods
Lake
Elsinore Menifee
Monrovia
Moreno
Valley
Murrieta Newport Beach
Norco
Oceanside
ntarioO
Orange Palm Desert
Palm
Springs
Perris
Poway
Rancho
Mirage
Rancho
Santa Margarita
Rialto
San Bernardino
San Clemente
San Dimas
San Jacinto
San Marcos
Santee
Solana
Beach
Temecula
Villa Park
Vista
Wildomar
Yucaipa
Yucca Valley S a n
B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y L o s A n g e l e s
C o u n t y
S a n D i e g o
C o u n t y
71 57
60 74
91 55
73 241
39 206 330
72 56
22 90
111
67 243
66 60
38 74
76 79
78 5
605
10 215
15 210
405
Project Site
0 375 750
Feet
Fire Protection Plan for the Gateway Heights Project
FIGURE 2
Flame Lengths
(Santa Ana Wind Event)
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2451 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 14 JANUARY 2023
Attachment 1
Site Aerial Photograph
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2452 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Photo log
Gateway Heights – Moreno Valley
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2453 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Aerial view of Project site. Land cover on site is disturbed, grassland, with minimal shrubs. Slopes to the north/northeast are sparsely vegetated with heavy rock outcrop ground cover. East/southeast includes large property single family homes. Land to the west is vacant and planned for development. Morton Road is directly to the west/southwest.

F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2454 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 15 JANUARY 2023
Attachment 2
Fuel Modification Plan
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2455 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Date: 12/12/2022 - Last saved by: lterry - Path: Z:\Projects\j1408800\MAPDOC\DOCUMENT\FPP\Appendix E Fuel Mod Plan.mxd

MORTON ROAD

JENNINGS COURT
30'
69'
96'
Proposed Project Fuel Modification Plan
Fire Protection Plan for the Gateway Heights Project
SOURCE: AERIAL- RIVERSIDE COUNTY 2019 0 80 160Feet

APPENDIX E
Project Boundary
30-Ft FMZ
100-Ft FMZ
FMZ Dimensions
6-Ft Masonry Wall
Land Use
Building Envelop
Development
Roadway
Driveway
Park
Slopes
Basin
Bench
Storm Drain System
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2456 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 16 JANUARY 2023
Attachment 3
Revised Site Plan Including Two Separate Ingress/Egress Roads F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2457 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040 APN: 256-150-039 APN: 256-150-038 APN: 256-150-037 APN: 256-040-012
(GATEWAY CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN)
APN: 256-160-017
APN: 256-160-002
(VACANT)
APN: 256-040-009
APN: 256-030-012
(VACANT)

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

MORTON ROAD

JENNINGS COURT
HILLMER COURT BASIN BBASIN A OPEN SPACE 15.97 ACRES PARK 0.89 ACRES 12,852SF PAD 1 PAD 2 12,852SF 12,852SF
PAD 3
PAD 4 12,852SF
PAD 5 16,254SF
PAD 6 12,852SF
PAD 7 7,674SF
PAD 8 12,852SF
PAD 9 16,254SF
PAD 10 16,254SF
PAD 11 16,254SF
PAD 12 12,852SF PAD 13 15,132SF BSL STREET A STREET B STREET C 38' 8885 Haven Avenue Suite 195 united engineering group Phone: 909.466.9240 CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, www.unitedeng.com IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

SITE PLAN (PEN21-0066)
BEING A PORTION OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA., INC DECEMBER 2022
UNITED ENGINEERING GROUP CA, INC OWNER/APPLICANT: ENGINEER/PLAN PREPARER SHIZAO ZHENG GENERAL NOTES: SURROUNDING LAND USE SITE DATA UTILITY PURVEYORS: LEGEND VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN GATEWAY HEIGHTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PEN21-0066 PROJECT LAND USE SITE LOCATION 215 60 GERNERT RD 215 FAIR AISLE DR JENNINGS CT PENUNURI PL TENNYSON RD BOX SPRINGS ROAD

CLARK ST
MORTON RD PAL FOXIA PL 142' DEVELOPER: JASON ACKERMAN F.1.k Packet Pg. 2458
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

TECHNICAL FIRE PROTECTION MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: GATEWAY HEIGHTS FIRE PROTECTION APPROACH
14088 17 JANUARY 2023
Attachment 4
Site Photographs
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2459 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) Photograph 1: Photograph taken from Morton Road looking northeast at the project site showing on and offsite fuels and adjacent hillslopes that exists up and away from the project site. Rock outcroppings covering the hillslope reduce wildfire hazard by taking away burnable fuels.

Photograph 2: Photograph taken from the western edge of the project site looking east. On-site fuels are low load and comprised of short shrubs and annual grasses.

ATTACHMENT 4 - SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
14088
NOVEMBER 2022 16
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2460 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)

APPENDIX A / PHOTOGRAPH LOG
Photograph 3: Photograph taken from the northern boundary of the project site looking west picturing adjacent shrub and grass fuels and electrical transmission line. Spacing between vegetation decreases wildfire spread.

Photograph 4: Photograph taken from northeastern boundary of project site showing shrub and grass fuels in addition to adjacent trees and rock outcroppings. Fuel loads are highest along the project site’s northern boundary.
14088
NOVEMBER 2022 17
F.1.k
Packet Pg. 2461 Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040 APN: 256-150-039 APN: 256-150-038
APN: 256-150-037
APN: 256-040-012
(GATEWAY CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN)
APN: 256-160-017
APN: 256-160-002
(VACANT)
APN: 256-040-009 (VACANT) APN: 256-030-012 (VACANT) STREET A STREET B STREET C High Fire Zone - 01 0-30' from structure · Fully irrigated landscape areas. · Trees to be trimmed 10' clear of structures. · Regular maintenance to remove dry and dead material. · Create separation between plantings and items that could catch fire. High Fire Zone - 02 30-100' from structure · Cut and mow annual grasses down to maximum height of 4". · Create horizontal spacing between trees. · Create vertical spacing between grasses. · Remove fallen leaves needles and branches. Slopes Area to be provided with vegetation thinning in accordance with defensible space requirements. OPEN SPACE 15.4 ACRES 30'-0" 70'-0" Property Line Property Line Property Line Property Line Single Family residential - existing structure natural vegetation natural vegetation Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure CITY OF MORENO VALLEY COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

JENNINGS COURT
MORTON ROAD w w w . i w o o d a r c h i t e c t u r e . c o m 0 120 feet 1" = 60' 60 180 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\04\22070_WA-fire protection plan.dwg31.01.2023bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 01.31.2023 Scale: 1" = 60' WOOD ARCHITECTURE PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 32.8 acres. Plants to be chosen from County of Riverside California Friendly Plant List and approved by the Fire Department. Zone 0 - Ember Resistant Zone Zone 0 extends 5 feet from buildings, structures, decks, etc. The ember-resistant zone is currently not required by law, but science has proven it to be the most important of all defensible space zones. This zone includes the area under and around all attached decks, and requires the most stringent wildfire fuel reduction. The ember-resistant zone is designed to keep fire or embers from igniting materials that can spread the fire to your home. The following provides guidance for this zone, which may change based on the regulation developed by the Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. · Use hardscape like gravel, pavers, concrete and other noncombustible mulch materials. No combustible bark or mulch. · Remove all dead and dying weeds, grass, plants, shrubs, trees, branches and vegetative debris (leaves, needles, cones, bark, etc.); Check your roofs, gutters, decks, porches, stairways, etc. · Remove all branches within 10 feet of any chimney or stovepipe outlet. · Limit plants in this area to low growing, non-woody, properly maintained plants. · Limit combustible items (outdoor furniture, planters, etc.) on top of decks. · Relocate firewood and lumber to Zone 2. · Replace combustible fencing, gates, and arbors attached to the home with noncombustible alternatives. · Consider relocating garbage and recycling containers outside this zone. · Consider relocating boats, RVs, vehicles and other combustible items outside this zone. Zone 1 - Lean, Clean and Green Zone Zone 1 extends 30 feet from buildings, structures, decks, etc. or to your property line, whichever is closer. · Remove all dead plants, grass and weeds (vegetation). · Remove dead or dry leaves and pine needles from yard, roof and rain gutters. · Remove branches that hang over your roof and keep dead branches 10 feet away from your chimney. · Trim trees regularly to keep branches a minimum of 10 feet away from your chimney. · Relocate firewood and lumber to Zone 2. · Remove or prune flammable plants and shrubs near windows. · Remove vegetation and items that could catch fire from around and under decks, balconies and stairs. · Create a separation between trees, shrubs and items that could catch fire, such as patio furniture, wood piles, swing sets, etc. *During times of drought when green landscaping cannot be achieved due to water restrictions be sure to remove all dead or dying material from Zone 1. Zone 2 - Reduce Fuel Zone Zone 2 extends from 30 feet to 100 feet out from buildings, structures, decks, etc. or to your property line, whichever is closer. · Cut or mow annual grass down to a maximum height of 4 inches. · Create horizontal space between shrubs and trees (See diagram). · Create vertical space between grass, shrubs, and trees. (See diagram). · Remove fallen leaves, needles, twigs, bark, cones, and small branches. However, they may be permitted to a depth of 3 inches. · All exposed wood piles must have a minimum of 10 feet of clearance, down to bare mineral soil, in all directions. F.1.k Packet Pg. 2462
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-150-011
APN: 256-150-010
APN: 256-150-040 APN: 256-150-039 APN: 256-150-038
APN: 256-150-037
APN: 256-040-012
(GATEWAY CENTER

SPECIFIC PLAN)

STREET A

STREET B
STREET C High Fire Zone - 01 0-30' from structure · Fully irrigated landscape areas. · Trees to be trimmed 10' clear of structures. · Regular maintenance to remove dry and dead material. · Create separation between plantings and items that could catch fire. High Fire Zone - 02 30-100' from structure · Cut and mow annual grasses down to maximum height of 4". · Create horizontal spacing between trees. · Create vertical spacing between grasses. · Remove fallen leaves needles and branches. OPEN SPACE 15.4 ACRES 30'-0" 70'-0" natural vegetation natural vegetation Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure Single Family residential - existing structure

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

JENNINGS COURT
MORTON ROAD NOTE: This info
subject to adjust
Client and Gove
or guarantees ar
Slopes Area to be provided with vegetation thinning in accordance with defensible space requirements. Irrigated Area NOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject to adjustments pending further verification and Client and Governmental Agency approval. No warranties or guarantees are given or implied by the Architect. w w w . i w o o d a r c h i t e c t u r e . c o m 0 120 feet 1" = 60' 60 180 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\04\22070_WA-fire protection plan_plants.dwg31.01.2023bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 01.31.2023 Scale: 1" = 60' WOOD ARCHITECTURE PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 32.8 acres. Plants to be chosen from County of Riverside California Friendly Plant List and approved by the Fire Department. F.1.k Packet Pg. 2463
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-
STREET B High Fire Zone-02 High Fire Zone-01 30'-100' from structure 0'-30' from structure Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Natural Vegetation Native non irrigated hydroseed mix Concrete wall Concrete wall 6' masonry wall 6' masonry wall NOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject to adjustments pending further verification and Client and Governmental Agency approval. No warranties or guarantees are given or implied by the Architect. TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE USE WUCOLS STYLE CA NATIVE Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard No Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Multi-trunk 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Lagerstroemia indica x fauriei 'Natchez' Natchez Crape Myrtle 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Medium Standard No Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Low Standard Yes Quercus wislizeni Interior Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Rhus lancea African Sumac 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Sample Plant Palette Sample Plant Palette SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE WUCOLS CA NATIVE Agave species Agave 5 gal Evergreen Low No Ceanothus spp. Ceanothus several species 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Cistus x pulverulentus 'Sunset' Sunset Rockrose 5 gal Evergreen Low No Dasylirion wheeleri Grey Desert Spoon 5 gal Evergreen Low No Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 5 gal Evergreen Low No Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Kniphofia uvaria 'Shining Sceptre' Shining Sceptre Red Hot Poker 5 gal Evergreen Low No Mimulus aurantiacus Sticky Monkeyflower 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Penstemon parryi Parry's Beardtongue 1 gal Evergreen Low No Rhamnus californica California Coffeeberry 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia leucantha Mexican Bush Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low No Salvia leucophylla Purple Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE WUCOLS CA NATIVE Acacia redolens 'Desert Carpet' Desert Carpet Bank Catclaw 5 gal Evergreen Low No Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Point' Pigeon Point Coyote Brush 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Ceanothus griseus horizontalis Carmel Creeper 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Myoporum parvifolium Trailing Myoporum 5 gal Evergreen Low No Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus' Prostrate Rosemary 5 gal Evergreen Low No Zauschneria californica California Fuchsia 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes NOTE: Fuel modification shall be HOA maintained. NOTE: All plants shown on this plan are either ground covers or trees. Z Z Z  L Z R R G a U F K L t e F t X U e  F R m 0 60 feet 1" = 30' 30 90 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\04\22070_WA-planting_30.dwg31.01.2023bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 01.31.2023 Scale: 1" = 30' :22' $5&+,7(&785( PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN MATCH-LINE F.1.k Packet Pg. 2464
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-150-012
APN: 256-1
APN: 256-150-040
APN: 256-040-012 (GATEWAY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN) STREET A STREET C PARK Turf Area High Fire Zone-01 0'-30' from structure High Fire Zone-02 30'-100' from structure Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. Access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common area. High Fire Zone-01 0'-30' from structure High Fire Zone-02 30'-100' from structure Native non irrigated hydroseed mix Native non irrigated hydroseed mix Concrete wall Concrete wall 6' masonry wall TREES BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE USE WUCOLS STYLE CA NATIVE Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard No Cercis occidentalis Western Redbud Multi-trunk 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Lagerstroemia indica x fauriei 'Natchez' Natchez Crape Myrtle 15 gal Deciduous Accent Tree Medium Standard No Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Low Standard Yes Quercus wislizeni Interior Live Oak 15 gal Evergreen Accent Tree Low Standard Yes Rhus lancea African Sumac 15 gal Evergreen Screen Tree Sample Plant Palette Sample Plant Palette SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE WUCOLS CA NATIVE Agave species Agave 5 gal Evergreen Low No Ceanothus spp. Ceanothus several species 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Cistus x pulverulentus 'Sunset' Sunset Rockrose 5 gal Evergreen Low No Dasylirion wheeleri Grey Desert Spoon 5 gal Evergreen Low No Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 5 gal Evergreen Low No Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Kniphofia uvaria 'Shining Sceptre' Shining Sceptre Red Hot Poker 5 gal Evergreen Low No Mimulus aurantiacus Sticky Monkeyflower 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Penstemon parryi Parry's Beardtongue 1 gal Evergreen Low No Rhamnus californica California Coffeeberry 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Salvia leucantha Mexican Bush Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low No Salvia leucophylla Purple Sage 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes GROUND COVERS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE TYPE WUCOLS CA NATIVE Acacia redolens 'Desert Carpet' Desert Carpet Bank Catclaw 5 gal Evergreen Low No Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Point' Pigeon Point Coyote Brush 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Ceanothus griseus horizontalis Carmel Creeper 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes Myoporum parvifolium Trailing Myoporum 5 gal Evergreen Low No Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus' Prostrate Rosemary 5 gal Evergreen Low No Zauschneria californica California Fuchsia 5 gal Evergreen Low Yes NOTE: Fuel modification shall be HOA maintained. NOTE: All plants shown on this plan are either ground covers or trees. Z Z Z  L Z R R G a U F K L t e F t X U e  F R m 0 60 feet 1" = 30' 30 90 \\Mac\Home\Desktop\Wood Architecture\22\22070_WA_Gateway Heights-Fire Resistant Landscape Plan_Moreno Valley, CA (JA)\Land\Schematic\04\22070_WA-planting_30.dwg31.01.2023bykurtkoether NORTH GATEWAY HEIGHTS MORENO VALLEY, CA Project: 22070_WA Date: 01.31.2023 Scale: 1" = 30' :22' $5&+,7(&785( PRELIMINARY FIRE PROTECTION PLAN MATCH-LINE F.1.k Packet Pg. 2465
Attachment: Gateway Heights PUD - 3 of 3 (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-040-012 (GATEWAY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN) APN: 256-160-017 APN: 256-160-002 V( ACANT) APN: 256-030-012 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JEN ING COURT PAD 3 12 8, 52SF 12,852SF SITE PLAN F.1.l Packet Pg. 2466
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) APN: 256-040-012 (GATEWAY CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN) APN: 256-160-017 APN: 256-160-002 V( ACANT) CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN F.1.l Packet Pg. 2467
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2468
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2469
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2470
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2471
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2472
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2473
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2474
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2475
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2476
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2477
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2478
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2479
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2480
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2481
Attachment: Project Plans (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) 1,504.7
1,261.9
WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere
0 630.96 1,261.9 Feet
Aerial Map
DISCLAIMER: The information shown on this map was compiled from the City of Moreno Valley GIS and Riverside County GIS. The land base and facility information on this map is for display purposes only and should not be relied upon without independent verification as to its accuracy. Riverside County and City of Moreno Valley will not be held responsible for any claims, losses or damages resulting from the use of this map.

Notes:

Legend
Print Date: 6/1/2023
Image Source: Nearmap
Master Plan of Trails
Bridge
Improved
Multiuse
Proposed
Regional
State
Road Labels
Parcels
City Boundary
Sphere of Influence
F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2482 Attachment: Aerial Map (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459) ID#6282 Page 1

PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: June 8, 2023

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, CHANGE OF ZONE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38459 FOR A 108-UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT
Case No.: General Plan Amendment (PEN20-0095)
Change of Zone (PEN20-0096)
CUP for a Planned Unit Development (PEN21-0066)
Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (PEN22-0127)
Applicant: HengHou Group
Representative: Jason Ackerman
Property Owner: Shizao Zheng
Project Site: East side of Morton Road, approximately 300 feet north of Jennings Court. APN 256-150-001
Case Planner: Luis Lopez, Contract Planner
Council District: 2
Proposed Project: A General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 for a 108-unit detached townhouse Planned Unit Development.

CEQA: Adopt Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

SUMMARY
The applicant, Shizao Zheng (HengHou Group), is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Change of Zone (CZ), Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development (CUP), and Tentative Tract Map No. 38459 (TTM) to facilitate a 108 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2483 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (6434 : Gateway Heights Tract 38459)