Moreno Valley City Council
April 2, 2024

AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF

THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES AND

THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF

DIRECTORS
April 2, 2024
-1-
REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 PM
City Council Study Sessions
Second Tuesday of each month – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Meetings
Special Presentations – 5:30 P.M.

First & Third Tuesday of each month – 6:00 p.m.

City Council Closed Sessions
Will be scheduled as needed at 4:30 p.m.

City Hall Council Chamber – 14177 Frederick Street
Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the ADA Coordinator, at 951.413.3350 at least 72 hours before the meeting. The 72-hour notification will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
Cheylynda Barnard, Mayor Pro Tem Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Edward A. Delgado, Council Member David Marquez, Council Member ..
-2-
AGENDA

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
April 2, 2024
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 PM

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

1. RECOGNIZING APRIL AS NATIONAL CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION MONTH

2. RECOGNIZING APRIL AS AUTISM AWARENESS MONTH

3. RECOGNITION OF 2024 FIRE EXPLORERS POST #58
.
-3-
.AGENDA

JOINT MEETING OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

THE BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES AND

THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS *THE CITY COUNCIL RECEIVES A SEPARATE STIPEND FOR CSD
MEETINGS*
REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 PM
APRIL 2, 2024
A. CALL TO ORDER
Joint Meeting of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority, the Board of Library Trustees and the Moreno Valley Community Foundation Board of Directors - actions taken at the Joint Meeting are those of the Agency indicated on each Agenda item.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. INVOCATION

PASTOR SERGIO CASAREZ, GENERATIONS CHURCH
D. ROLL CALL
E. MOTIONS TO EXCUSE ABSENCES
F. STAFF INTRODUCTIONS
G. APPROVAL OF ORDER OF AGENDA
H. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Speakers shall have a total of three minutes to comment on any matters not on the agenda.

Comments must pertain to matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council and/or Affiliated Boards.
-4-
I. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
Speakers have a total of three minutes to comment on all matters on the Joint Consent Calendar which are not pulled for separate discussion by the City Council and/or Affiliated Boards.

Any member of the City Council or Affiliated Boards may pull an item from the Joint Consent Calendar for discussion purposes, prior to approval of the Joint Consent Calendar.

After any requested discussion involving any given Consent item has taken place, all Consent items may be approved with one motion.

I.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY- - THE MOTION TO ADOPT

AN ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES
WAIVER OF FULL READING ON THE ORDINANCE.

Recommendation: Waive reading of all Ordinances.

I.2.MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - MAR 19, 2024 4:30 PM Recommendation: Approve as Submitted.

I.3. MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - MAR 19, 2024 6:00 PM Recommendation: Approve as Submitted.

I.4. OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM ANNUAL SPONSORSHIP - EVENT CHANGE (Report of: City Clerk) Recommendation:

1. That the City Council allow Think Together to use previously approved funding from the Office of the Mayor and City Council Sponsorship Program for Think Together’s cancelled ”Raise a Hand for Education Benefit” for “Spring Kit Build Event.”
I.5. PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS
MAINTENANCE) - AMENDMENT NO. 147 (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation:

1. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2024-__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 147) (Michael David Mottesheard & Michael Daniel Mottesheard -5-
located at 12547 & 12549 Lasselle St.).

I.6. APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 STORM WATER
PROTECTION PROGRAM BUDGET FOR COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152
(Report of: Public Works)
Recommendations:

1. Approve the County Service Area (CSA) 152 Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/2025 in the amount $708,262; and

2. Authorize to continue the levy of the County Service Area 152 Assessment at the same rate as the prior year ($8.15) per Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU) for FY 2024/2025.

I.7. PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) – APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER

CONSERVATION DISTRICT, THE CITY, AND HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW
OPERATING CO., FOR THE MORENO MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN (MDP) LINE F, STAGE 4 AND MORENO – LINE F LATERALS LOCATED ON

FUTURE PACIFIC GATEWAY BETWEEN EUCALYPTUS AVENUE AND
FUTURE BASIN F. DEVELOPER: HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW OPERATING
CO. (Report of: Public Works)
Recommendations:

1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the District), the City of Moreno Valley (the City), and Highland Fairview Operating Co. (the Developer), for the MDP Line F, Stage 4 and Moreno – Line F Laterals.

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Agreement.

3. Direct the City Clerk to forward the signed Cooperative Agreement to the District.

J. PUBLIC HEARINGS
Public testimony on each Public Hearing item shall be limited to three minutes per speaker and must pertain to the subject under consideration.

Those wishing to testify are encouraged to complete and submit a GOLDENROD speaker slip to the City Clerk Staff.

J.1. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE (Report of: Public Works)
Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. First Public Hearing:
-6-
a) Conduct the first Public Hearing for the proposed adoption of the Development Impact Nexus Fee Study Update (Dated April 2, 2024) (“2024 DIF Nexus Study”) which incorporates the adoption of the City of Moreno Valley’s 2024 Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023-24 and 2024-25;
b) After the Public Hearing, adopt Resolution No. 2024-XX adopting the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, and finding the action is exempt from CEQA;

2. Second Public Hearing:
a) Conduct the second Public Hearing for the proposed adjustment of the City’s Development Impact Fees; and
b) After the Public Hearing, adopt Resolution No. 2024-XX adjusting the City’s Development Impact Fees, and finding the action is exempt from CEQA.

K. GENERAL BUSINESS - NONE
Public comment on each General Business item shall be limited to three minutes per speaker and must pertain to the subject under consideration.

Those wishing to speak are encouraged to complete and submit a BLUE speaker slip to the City Clerk Staff.

L. REGIONAL COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD REPORTS
L.1. REGIONAL COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD
(Informational Oral Presentation - not for Council action) March Joint Powers Commission (JPC)
Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board of Directors (RCHCA)
Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors (RTA)
Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Committee (WRCOG)
Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board of Directors (RCA)
School District/City Joint Task Force
M. EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION REPORTS
-7-
N. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
(Informational Oral Presentation - not for Council action) O. CITY COUNCIL CLOSING COMMENTS
Individual Council Member comments shall be limited to five minutes P. ADJOURNMENT

PUBLIC INSPECTION
The contents of the agenda packet are available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City Clerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.

Any written information related to an open session agenda item that is known by the City to have been distributed to all or a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours prior to this meeting will be made available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City Clerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.
..

CERTIFICATION
I, Jane Halstead, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, certify that 72 hours prior to this Regular Meeting, the City Council Agenda was posted on the City’s website at: www.moval.org and in the following three public places pursuant to City of Moreno Valley Resolution No. 2007-40:

City Hall, City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley Library
25480 Alessandro Boulevard
Moreno Valley Senior/Community Center
25075 Fir Avenue
Jane Halstead, CMC
City Clerk
Date Posted: March 28, 2024
-1-

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY
CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 PM
March 19, 2024

CALL TO ORDER
The Closed Session of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley, Housing Authority, and the Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority was called to order at 4:32 p.m. by Mayor Cabrera in the Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, California.

Mayor Cabrera announced that the City Council receives a separate stipend for CSD meetings.

ROLL CALL
Council: Ulises Cabrera
Ed Delgado
David Marquez
Cheylynda Barnard
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz
Mayor
Council Member
Council Member
Mayor Pro Tem
Council Member

PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS ON THE AGENDA ONLY
Mayor Cabrera opened the public comments portion of the meeting for items listed on the agenda only. There being no members of the public to come forward to speak, he closed the public comments.

I.2
Packet Pg. 8
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 4:30 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -2-

CLOSED SESSION
City Attorney Steven Quintanilla announced that the City Council would recess to Closed Session to discuss the items as listed on the agenda and that he does not anticipate there to be a post Closed Session announcement.

A. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
Property: Assessor Parcel Number 297-220-021
Negotiator(s): Brian Mohan, Asst. City Manager
Negotiating Parties: City of Moreno Valley & Moreno Office Partners Under Negotiation: Price and/or terms of payment.

B. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Pursuant To Government Code Section 54957
Title: City Manager
Mayor Cabrera recessed the City Council to the City Manager's Conference Room, second floor, City Hall, for their Closed Session at 4:35 p.m.

Mayor Cabrera reconvened the City Council in the Council Chamber from their Closed Session at 5:27 p.m.

REPORT OF ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION, IF ANY, BY CITY ATTORNEY City Attorney Steven Quintanilla announced that there was no reportable action taken in Closed Session.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Cabrera adjourned the meeting at 5:28 pm.

I.2
Packet Pg. 9
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 4:30 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -3-
Submitted by:
___________________________
Jane Halstead, CMC
City Clerk
Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Secretary, City as Successor Agency for the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Secretary, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Secretary, Board of Library Trustees
Secretary, Public Financing Authority
Approved by:
___________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
President, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Chairperson, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Chairperson, Board of Library Trustees
Chairperson, Public Financing Authority
I.2
Packet Pg. 10
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 4:30 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS)

MINUTES

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY March 19, 2024
-1-
CALL TO ORDER - 5:30 PM

SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS

1. Women's History Month Proclamation
Mayor Pro Tem Barnard and Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz presented the Women's History Month Proclamation to Dr. Mary McBean and the Edgemont Women's Club.

2. Recognizing MVUSD Canyon Springs High School - Boys & Girls Wrestling Team Council Member Delgado presented the recognition to the MVUSD Canyon Spring High School Boys and Girls Wrestling team.

3. Recognizing Inland United 9u- 2024 State Champ Team
Mayor Cabrera presented the recognition to the Inland United 9u 2024 State Champion team.

I.3
Packet Pg. 11
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -2-

MINUTES

JOINT MEETING OF THE

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE

COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING – 6:00 PM
March 19, 2024
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Joint Meeting of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley Housing Authority, Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority and the Board of Library Trustees was called to order at 6:02 p.m. by Mayor Cabrera in the Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street.

Mayor Cabrera announced that the City Council receives a separate stipend for CSD meetings.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Delgado.

C. INVOCATION - LIGHTHOUSE BAPTIST CHURCH - PASTOR DONNY WILSON The invocation was given by Pastor Donny Wilson of Lighthouse Baptist Church.

D. ROLL CALL
Council: Ulises Cabrera Mayor
Cheylynda Barnard Mayor Pro Tem
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz Council Member
Ed Delgado Council Member
David Marquez Council Member
I.3
Packet Pg. 12
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -3-
E. MOTIONS TO EXCUSE ABSENCES
None.

F. STAFF INTRODUCTIONS
Staff: Jane Halstead Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City Council/City Clerk
Patty Rodriguez Senior Deputy City Clerk
Steven Quintanilla City Attorney
Mike Lee City Manager
Brian Mohan Assistant City Manager, City Treasurer
Sean Kelleher Acting Assistant City Manager/Community
Development Director
Launa Jimenez Chief Financial Officer
Melissa Walker Public Works Director/City Engineer
Jeremy Bubnick Parks and Community Services Director
Robert Cardenas Human Resources Director
Cruz Esparza Economic Development Director
Ken Reichle Chief of Police
Jeff Burrow Battalion Chief
Assistant City Manager provided a request for an urgency item to be brough forth at tonight’s meeting.

Assistant City Manager Brian Mohan provided a report on the urgency item.

Motion made by Council Member Delgado and seconded by Council Member Marquez to add an urgency item to the agenda for the approval of a letter of support for a project in Moreno Valley.

Motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Pro Tem Barnard, and Mayor Cabrera voting yes.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ed Delgado, Council Member
SECONDER: David Marquez, Council Member
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz Assistant City Manager Brian Mohan provided a report on the letter of support related to the Riverside County Flood Control District project at the Cactus Flood Control Channel.

Council Member Marquez asked questions of staff.

I.3
Packet Pg. 13
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -4-
City Attorney Steven Quintanilla responded to Council Member Marquez's inquiries.

Mayor Cabrera read the letter that was subject to approval at the meeting and sent to the City's Federal Government Representatives.

Mayor Cabrera called for public comments to be heard.

With no public comments on the matter, Mayor Cabrera called for Council deliberation.

With no Council deliberation, Mayor Cabrera entertained a motion.

Motion made by Mayor Cabrera and seconded by Council Member Marquez to approve a letter of support related to the Riverside County Flood Control District project at the Cactus Flood Control Channel.

Motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Pro Tem Barnard, and Mayor Cabrera voting yes.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
SECONDER: David Marquez, Council Member
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz G. APPROVAL OF ORDER OF AGENDA
Motion made by Council Member Marquez and seconded by Council Member Delgado to approve the order of the agenda.

Motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Pro Tem Barnard, and Mayor Cabrera voting yes.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: David Marquez, Council Member
SECONDER: Ed Delgado, Council Member
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz H. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Fabian Ayub

1. Down Syndrome Day.

Priscilla Ayub
I.3
Packet Pg. 14
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -5-

1. Yielded time to Fabian Ayub.

Julie Ann Pedroza

1. Building Up Lives Foundation.

Joe Teague

1. Public Safety Concerns.

Kayla Sankey

1. Homelessness Public Safety.

Bob Palomarez

1. Homeless concerns.

Roy Bleckert

1. Concerns.

Alma DeLeon

1. Immigration resources.

Louise Palomarez

1. Concerns.

Christopher Baca

1. Homeless concerns.

I. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
Mayor Cabrera asked the City Council if they would like any items pulled for separate action or discussion.

With no items being pulled for separate action or discussion, Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Barnard provided comments on item I.6.

Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Barnard recused themselves from item I.6 due to a potential conflicts of interest. With the item being on the consent calendar, the City Attorney’s Office informed both Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Barnard that they do not have to leave the Council Chambers, but that the minutes will reflect their recusal from the item.

Mayor Cabrera entertained a motion.

I.3
Packet Pg. 15
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -6-
Motion made by Council Member Marquez and seconded by Council Member Delgado to approve the consent calendar.

Motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Pro Tem Barnard, and Mayor Cabrera voting yes, with Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Delgado recusing themselves on the vote for I.6.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: David Marquez, Council Member
SECONDER: Ed Delgado, Council Member
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz ABSTAIN: Cabrera and Barnard on Item I.6. only
I.1. ORDINANCES - READING BY TITLE ONLY - THE MOTION TO ADOPT AN

ORDINANCE LISTED ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR INCLUDES WAIVER

OF FULL READING ON THE ORDINANCE
Recommendation:

1. Waived reading of all Ordinances.

I.2. CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - MAR 5, 2024 4:30 PM Recommendation:

1. Approved as Submitted.

I.3. CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - MAR 5, 2024 6:00 PM Recommendation:

1. Approved as Submitted.

I.4. COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 FROM JULY 1, 2023 THROUGH FEBRUARY 29, 2024. (Report of: City Clerk)
Recommendation:

1. Received and filed the Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Council Discretionary Expenditure Report for July 1, 2023 through February 29, 2024.

I.5. COUNCIL TRAINING & TRAVEL EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024 (Report of: City Clerk)
Recommendation:

I.3
Packet Pg. 16
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -7-

1. Received and filed the Training & Travel Authorization Forms for the month of February 2024.

I.6. SECOND READING AND CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF
ORDINANCE NOS. 1009 AND 1010 (Report of: Community Development) Recommendation:

Project #1, South of Iris, Heritage Park Neighborhood I

1. Conducted a second reading by title only and adopted Ordinance No. 1009.

Project #2, Goya at Heritage Park, Heritage Park Neighborhood II

2. Conducted a second reading by title only and adopted Ordinance No. 1010.

I.7. LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES (Report of: City Manager) Recommendation:

1. Ratified the list of personnel changes as described.

I.8. PAYMENT REGISTER - JANUARY 2024 (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendation:

1. Received and filed the Payment Register.

I.9. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY
ASSESSMENTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 FOR MORENO VALLEY

COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 2014-02 (RESO. NOS. CSD 2024-22, CSD 2024-23, AND CSD 2024-24) (Report of: Financial & Management Services) Recommendations:

1. Adopted Resolution No. CSD 2024-22, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Initiating Proceedings to Levy the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Assessments against Real Property in Moreno Valley Community Services District Landscape Maintenance District No. 2014-02.

2. Adopted Resolution No. CSD 2024-23, a Resolution of the Board for I.3
Packet Pg. 17
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -8-
the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Approving an Engineer’s Report in Connection with the 2024/25 Assessments against Real Property in Moreno Valley Community Services District Landscape Maintenance District No. 2014-02.

3. Adopted Resolution No. CSD 2024-24, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Declaring its Intention to Levy the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Assessments against Real Property in Moreno Valley Community Services District Landscape Maintenance District No. 2014-02.

I.10. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO LEVY ASSESSMENTS IN FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 FOR MORENO VALLEY

COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2014-01 (RESO NOS. CSD 2024-25, CSD 2024-26, AND CSD 2024-27) (Report of: Financial & Management Services)
Recommendations:

1. Adopted Resolution No. CSD 2024-25, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Initiating Proceedings to Levy Fiscal Year 2024/25 Assessments against Real Property in Moreno Valley Community Services District Lighting Maintenance District No. 2014-01.

2. Adopted Resolution No. CSD 2024-26, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Approving an Engineer’s Report in Connection with Fiscal Year 2024/25 Assessments against Real Property in Moreno Valley Community Services District Lighting Maintenance District No. 2014-01.

3. Adopted Resolution No. CSD 2024-27, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Declaring its Intention to Levy Fiscal Year 2024/25 Assessments against Real Property in Moreno Valley Community Services District Lighting Maintenance District No. 2014-01.

I.11. AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF

GOVERNMENTS FOR THE AWARDED SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES

PROGRAM CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, EQUITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL
JUSTICE GRANT (Report of: Public Works)
I.3
Packet Pg. 18
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -9-
Recommendation:

1. Authorized the Public Works Director/City Engineer to execute the Sustainable Communities Program Civic Engagement, Equity, and Environmental Justice (SCP CEEEJ) Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

J. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.

K. GENERAL BUSINESS
K.1. REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE ART COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF PUBLIC ART REQUEST FOR FUNDING APPLICATION–CHRISTOPHER
POUPORE MURAL EL POTRERO PARK RESTROOM (Report of: Parks & Community Services)
Art Commission’s Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. Receive and file the artist presentation; and

2. Review and consider the Art Commission’s approval of Public Art Request for Funding Application from Christopher Poupore for a 400 square feet mural at El Potrero Park restroom, a time lapse video, and a workshop; and

3. Authorized Executive Director and or its designee to enter into an agreement for services with the approved applicant and submit a budget adjustment request to utilize funding from DIF Public Art Fund 2916.

Parks and Community Services Director introduced the artist.

Applicant Christopher Poupore provided a report.

With the conclusion of the report, Mayor Cabrera called for Council questions of the applicant or staff.

Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz Council Member Delgado asked questions of the applicant.

Applicant Christopher Poupore responded to the Council’s inquiries.

I.3
Packet Pg. 19
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -10-
With no further Council questions, Mayor Cabrera called for public comments to be heard.

Roy Bleckert

1. Opposed.

Louise Palomarez

1. Opposed.

Bob Palomarez

1. Opposed.

Mayor Cabrera called for Council deliberation.

The City Council deliberated on the item.

Council Member Marquez expressed his desire to have this item continued to a later date.

Motion made by Council Member Marquez and seconded by
Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz to continue this item to the September 17, 2024 City Council meeting.

Motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Pro Tem Barnard, and Mayor Cabrera voting yes.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: David Marquez, Council Member
SECONDER: Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz The City Council expressed their desire to schedule a Study Session to discuss the Public Art Policy and Art DIF eligible funding.

Motion made by Mayor Cabrera and seconded by Council Member Delgado to schedule a Study Session in June to discuss the Public Art Policy and Art DIF eligible funding.

Motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Pro Tem Barnard, and Mayor Cabrera voting yes.

I.3
Packet Pg. 20
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -11-
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
SECONDER: Ed Delgado, Council Member
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz K.2. PROVIDE DIRECTION REGARDING THE MOTION TO CREATE AN AD

HOC POLICY SUBCOMMITTEE REGARDING A HOMELESS TASK FORCE VIA A REVISION TO ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 1.07 COUNCIL
SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS (Report of: City Manager)
Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. Provided direction regarding MPT Barnard’s motion to create an Ad Hoc Policy Subcommittee regarding a Homeless Task Force via a revision to Administrative Policy 1.07 Council Subcommittee Meetings.

Assistant City Manager Brian Mohan provided the staff report.

Mayor Cabrera called for Council recess at 8:18 pm.

The City Council reconvened at 8:26 pm.

Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Cabrera, and Mayor Pro Tem Barnard asked questions of staff.

Assistant City Manager Brian Mohan and Chief Reichle responded to the Council's inquiries.

Assistant City Manager Brian Mohan provided an additional report.

With no additional questions, Mayor Cabrera called for public comments to be heard.

Maribel Nunez

1. Support.

JulieAnn Pedroza

1. Support.

Drew Foggo

1. Support for local non-profits.

Roy Bleckert

1. Concerns.

I.3
Packet Pg. 21
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -12-
Christopher Baca

1. Concerns.

Bob Palomarez

1. Concerns.

Louise Palomarez

1. Concerns.

Phillip Rosenberg

1. Support.

Mayor Cabrera called for Council deliberation.

The City Council deliberated on the item.

Council Member Delgado expressed concerns on approving this item tonight and stated he would like to see Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Delgado work with Assistant City Manager Brian Mohan to create guidelines for the creation of an Ad Hoc Policy Subcommittee regarding a Homeless Task Force.

Motion made by Council Member Delgado and seconded by
Council Member Marquez to continue the item to a date uncertain and direct staff to work with Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Barnard on creating guidelines for the creation of an Ad Hoc Policy Subcommittee regarding a Homeless Task Force.

Motion passed by a vote of 5-0, with Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz, Council Member Delgado, Council Member Marquez, Mayor Pro Tem Barnard, and Mayor Cabrera voting yes.

RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ed Delgado, Council Member
SECONDER: David Marquez, Council Member
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz L. REGIONAL COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD REPORTS
L.1. REGIONAL COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD
I.3
Packet Pg. 22
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -13-
March Joint Powers Commission (JPC)
Council Member Delgado reported the following:

It was a very busy meeting:
• We heard an update about the Military Compatibility Use Study. • We granted Meridian Park LLC an extension on their Exclusive Negotiating Agreement for the Aviation Gateway Project at the airport.

Finally, we discussed plans for new backbone gas line infrastructure to serve the March LifeCare and Green Acres areas.

Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board of Directors (RCHCA)
None.

Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Council Member Delgado reported the following:

The Commission approved programming up to an additional $35 million of 2009 Measure A Western County Regional Arterial (MARA) funds for the city of Jurupa Valley’s Jurupa Road Grade Separation project.

During the meeting, Caltrans’ representative briefed the commissioners on the status of the potholes along I-215. The maintenance crews will make efforts to repair the highway. Furthermore, Caltrans District 8 is looking for emergency funds to start highway surface rehabilitation.

Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors (RTA)
Council Member Marquez reported the following:

The Committee heard a presentation on the current retired vehicle transfer policy and approved authorization of staff to add eight (8) applications to the RTA’s retired vehicle recipient waitlist.

I.3
Packet Pg. 23
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -14-
That concludes my report on the last RTA Board Administration and Operations Committee meeting.

Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Committee (WRCOG) None.

Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board of Directors (RCA)
None.

School District/City Joint Task Force
None.

M. EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION REPORTS
None.

N. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

1. City awards.

O. CITY COUNCIL CLOSING COMMENTS
Council Member Baca-Santa Cruz

1. Community events.

2. Public engagement.

3. World Down Syndrome Day.

Council Member Marquez

1. Community events.

2. Public safety.

Council Member Delgado
I.3
Packet Pg. 24
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -15-

1. Public safety.

2. Community events.

Mayor Pro Tem Barnard

1. Community events.

2. World Down Syndrome Day.

Mayor Cabrera

1. Community events.

2. Moreno Valley Mall Library updates.

3. Elections.

P. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Cabrera adjourned the meeting at 10:02 PM.

I.3
Packet Pg. 25
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) -16-
Submitted by:
___________________________
Jane Halstead, CMC
City Clerk
Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Secretary, City as Successor Agency for the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Secretary, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Secretary, Board of Library Trustees
Secretary, Public Financing Authority
Approved by:
___________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
President, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Chairperson, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Chairperson, Board of Library Trustees
Chairperson, Public Financing Authority
I.3
Packet Pg. 26
Minutes Acceptance: Minutes of Mar 19, 2024 6:00 PM (JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS) Report to City Council
ID#6579 Page 1
TO:

FROM: Jane Halstead, CMC, City Clerk
AGENDA DATE: April 2, 2024
TITLE: OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM | ANNUAL SPONSORSHIP -

EVENT CHANGE

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

1. That the City Council allow Think Together to use previously approved funding from the Office of the Mayor and City Council Sponsorship Program for Think Together’s cancelled ”Raise a Hand for Education Benefit” for it new “Spring Kit Build Event.”

SUMMARY/DISCUSSION
On September 19, 2023, the City Council unanimously approved the Office of the Mayor and City Council Sponsorship Program, which included the allocation of $60,000 in sponsorships to different local organizations and their annual events.

According to the City’s Sponsorship Policy, as set forth in General Management Policy

2.13, it is the City’s policy to only sponsor or co-sponsor certain events provided to the community by non-profit organizations. Sponsorship is a discretionary act of the City that confers no legal rights in the sponsorship proceeds or assistance prior to actual delivery by the City.

Think Together received funding in the amount of $2,500.00 for its “Raise a Hand for Education Benefit” which it had to cancel, and the organization is requesting to use the funds for a new event called the “Spring Kit Build Event,” which will provide Science, Math, and Art learning kits to elementary students in Moreno Valley. However, since the original funding was designated for the former “Raise a Hand for Education Benefit,” council approval is required before the funds may be used for a different event.

I.4
Packet Pg. 27

According its website (https://thinktogether.org), Think Together delivers nationallyrecognized after school programs, early learning, enrichment, and school improvement in close to 500 schools in California from San Diego to San Francisco – serving over 200,000 students. Their mission is to create a community where all kids get a great education that prepares them for college and career.

According to the California Secretary of State’s Office, Think Together remains in good standing with the California Franchise Tax Board and its tax exempt status is still valid.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve as recommended. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Do not approve as recommended but provide an alternative direction to staff.

FISCAL IMPACT
No additional fiscal impact to the City.

NOTIFICATION
Posting of the agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Jasmin Rivera Jane Halstead
Executive Assistant to the Mayor & City Council City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
I.4
Packet Pg. 28

To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. April 2024 Kit Build Sponsor Flyer

2. Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 3/28/24 10:47 AM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 3/28/24 10:47 AM
I.4
Packet Pg. 29
Sponsor and volunteer at Think
Together’s kit-building event this
spring. Your support will provide
science, math, and art learning kits to
elementary students across California.

All sponsors will receive prominent
recognition at the event, on our
website, and in promotional emails.

THINK

TOGETHER
Spring Kit Build Event

SPONSOR &

JOIN US SUPPORT
thinktogether.org

VOLUNTEER
Please email

SARAH MANCINELLI
to RSVP to this event
[email protected]
Friday, April 19th:
2:30pm - 4:30pm
Saturday, April 20th:
10:00am - 12:00pm
Think Together Office
Santa Ana, CA
Donate here to equip our
classrooms with learning
kits.
$1,000 = 120 students
$2,500 = 300 students
$5,000 = 600 students
$10,000 = 1,200 students
$15,000 = 1,800 students
$25,000 = 3,030 students
$35,000 = 4,260 students
$50,000 = 6,060 students
I.4.a
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: April 2024 Kit Build Sponsor Flyer (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT Report to City Council
ID#6400 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Jane Halstead, CMC, City Clerk
AGENDA DATE: September 19, 2023
TITLE: OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

1. That the City Council approve the annual $60,000.00 Office of the Mayor and City Council Sponsorship Program.

SUMMARY/DISCUSSION
Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Delgado have requested the following proposed $60,000 annual sponsorship events and programs be presented to the City Council for its consideration.

Policy 2.13 City Sponsorship outlines the criteria that must be met by any person or entity requesting City sponsorship, which usually includes submitting a Sponsorship application to the City Manager, who may defer the request to the City Council.

However, the Sponsorship Program has already been budgeted for the 2024/25 fiscal year budget, no applications will be required.

The proposed sponsorship contributions are as follows:

ONE-TIME ANNUAL EVENT SPONSORSHIPS
Riverside University Health System Medical Center - Festival of Trees Gala $9,500.00 Riverside Drive March Air Reserve Base - Air & Space Expo $5,000.00 Southwest Veterans' Business Resource Center, Inc. - Veteran & Small Business Summit $3,300.00 Riverside Sheriff’s Association - Desert Willow Charity Golf Tournament $2,500.00 Think Together - Raise a Hand for Education Benefit $2,500.00 I.4.b
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT CHANGE)

Riverside University Health System Foundation - Pinwheels for Prevention $2,500.00 Veteran Supplemental Support Network - Daisy Walk for Military and Veteran Suicide Prevention
$2,500.00
Riverside County Workforce Development Board - Jamil Dada Character Excellence Youth Awards
$2,500.00
Riverside County Sheriff's Department - Annual Award Ceremony $1,000.00

ORGANIZATION SPONSORSHIPS
Moreno Valley & Val Verde Unified School District | Student of the Month Program $5,000.00 Moreno Valley Community Band (MVCB)/Wind Symphony $5,000.00 Pacific Crest Youth Arts Organization SoCal Drum Corps $2,500.00 Building Up Lives Foundation $2,000.00
Power Speaks Louder $2,000.00
Inland Compassion $2,000.00
Support Move & Groove For Health $2,000.00
Unity of The Faith Christian Outreach Ministries Inc. $2,000.00 The Hole In Wall Inc. $1,000.00
Imani Praise Fellowship $2,000.00
Rising Stars Business Academy YouthBuild $1,000.00
Edgemont Women's Club $1,000.00
Moreno Valley Trailseekers $500.00
San Gorgino Girls Scouts $500.00
Total: $59,800.00

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve as recommended. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Do not approve as recommended but provide an alternative direction to staff.

Staff recommends this alternative.

FISCAL IMPACT
The various sponsorship are budgeted, the above list has no additional fiscal impact to the City.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of the Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Name Jane Halstead Name Jane Halstead
Title Manager of the Office of Mayor and City Council/City Clerk Title Manager of the Office of Mayor and City Council/City Clerk
I.4.b
Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT CHANGE)

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Policy #2.13

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 9/14/23 8:11 AM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 9/14/23 8:56 AM
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Ed Delgado, Council Member
SECONDER: Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
AYES: Cabrera, Delgado, Marquez, Barnard, Baca-Santa Cruz I.4.b
Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT CHANGE) City of Moreno Valley General Management
Policy 2.13

CITY SPONSORSHIP
Approved by: City Council
9/24/02
Revised: 11/25/08
PURPOSE: City sponsorship is provided for the purpose of aiding eligible organizations in providing worthwhile community events by paying a portion of the costs and receiving positive publicity for the City. The purpose of this policy is to set forth criteria to be met by the applicant prior to consideration of the request for sponsorship, as well as policies and procedures to be followed by the City in acting on the request for sponsorship.

POLICY:

I. Sponsorship
The City of Moreno Valley receives numerous requests to sponsor or co-sponsor events, activities, individuals or groups. The City has limited resources available for these sponsorship opportunities. For that reason, it is the City’s policy to only sponsor or co-sponsor cultural or recreational events provided to the community by nonprofit organizations existing pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3) or (4) that are located within the City. Sponsorship is a discretionary act of the City that confers no legal rights in the sponsorship proceeds or assistance prior to actual delivery by the City. No organization shall receive any City sponsorship proceeds or assistance unless and until it meets all of the criteria and satisfies all of the conditions contained within this policy and said sponsorship requester has submitted a completed application packet to the satisfaction of the City Manager. Upon approval of the Sponsorship Application packet, the sponsorship request will be forwarded to the City Council for review and consideration.

II. Organization Eligibility
Criteria for organization eligibility for City sponsorship is as follows:

A. Applicant must be organized and existing pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3) or (4).

B. Applicant must have as its primary purpose charity, youth development, cultural enrichment, or civic improvement.

C. Applicant must be located within the City and providing services or benefits to the community.

D. Applicant must complete and comply with the application process.

E. Applicant must demonstrate a need for City sponsorship.

F. Past events by the applicant must have complied with City requirements and have been free of significant problems.

G. Applicant must have a valid City Business License.

III. Event Eligibility
Criteria for event eligibility are as follows:

A. Fundraising shall not be the primary purpose of the event.

B. Cultural or recreational events only.

C. Past similar events by the applicant must have complied with City requirements and have been free of I.4.b
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT CHANGE) City of Moreno Valley General Management
Policy 2.13

CITY SPONSORSHIP
Approved by: City Council
9/24/02
Revised: 11/25/08
significant problems.

D. Open to the general public without qualification and must be widely publicized.

E. Located within the City including the City sphere of influence March Air Reserve Base, March Joint Powers Authority property, and Box Springs Park.

IV. Sponsorship Limitations
Sponsorship proceeds or assistance shall not result in any money being actually given to or paid in behalf of the event organizer. Sponsored events will only receive a “line of credit” with the City that will allow the group to receive credits of City costs up to the designated amount of the sponsorship for the event. Eligible City costs that can be offset by the sponsorship proceeds or assistance up to the maximum amount of the sponsorship are limited to the following:

A. Mobile stage rental. (A monetary deposit by the applicant will be required.) B. Facility rental. (A monetary deposit by the applicant will be required.) C. Light or electric pole use in City parks.

D. City Permits.

E. Public Safety Services.

F. City Staff.

V. Sponsorship Amounts
The amount of sponsorship proceeds or assistance shall be determined as follows:

A. Depending on availability of resources, the City will budget $5,000 per fiscal year to be used for sponsorship opportunities.

B. The maximum sponsorship for any qualified organization and event shall not exceed $2,500 per fiscal year.

C. The maximum amount of sponsorship shall be directly proportional to the total attendance of the public at the sponsored event as follows:

1. 250 - 500 in attendance = $500 per event.

2. 501 - 750 in attendance = $750 per event.

3. 751 - 1,000 in attendance = $1,000 per event.

4. Over 1,001 in attendance = $2,500 per event.

In no case shall the sponsorship amount exceed fifty percent (50%) of the funds raised for the event.

I.4.b
Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT CHANGE) City of Moreno Valley General Management
Policy 2.13

CITY SPONSORSHIP
Approved by: City Council
9/24/02
Revised: 11/25/08
D. Sponsorship amounts or assistance shall not be utilized to cover the cost of insurance.

VI. Application Process
A. Submit a completed City application (Attachment A) for sponsorship at least 90 calendar days prior to the event date. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be automatic grounds for denying sponsorship. The application shall include a detailed description or listing of the estimated funds, inkind donations and/or other assistance the organization will receive to support the organization and/or event.

B. A completed application means completion of the City application for sponsorship, attachment of all required additional documentation, payment of all fees, if applicable, and submission of whatever other information and/or documentation that may be requested by the City to make an informed decision.

C. Incomplete applications shall not be eligible for City sponsorship.

D. Applicants shall receive a copy of this policy at the time an application is made to the City.

VII. Approval
A. A determination shall be made by the City Manager or his/her designee, within 30 calendar days after submission of an application for sponsorship as to its completeness.

B. The City Manager shall refer the request for sponsorship to the City Council for determination.

Determinations on requests for sponsorship shall be made within 30 calendar days after submission of a completed application.

C. All decisions of the City Council regarding sponsorship shall be final.

VIII. Other Requirements
A. Applicant must agree in writing to defend and indemnify the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District, the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley and their officers, employees and agents from and against any and all liability and claims of liability arising out of or otherwise arising from the event.

B. Applicant shall submit to the City at least 10 calendar days prior to the event an event implementation plan, if requested by the City. The event implementation plan shall address in detail all issues requested by the City.

C. Applicant shall agree to list the City of Moreno Valley as an official sponsor of the event in all promotion of the event. Failure to do so shall result in termination of the sponsorship and repayment to the City the monetary value of all sponsorship proceeds or assistance delivered to the applicant or for the event.

D. Applicant shall coordinate and work directly with the City Manager or his/her designee for use of the City name and City logo.

I.4.b
Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT CHANGE) City of Moreno Valley General Management
Policy 2.13

CITY SPONSORSHIP
Approved by: City Council
9/24/02
Revised: 11/25/08
E. Applicant must have adequate public liability and other necessary insurance for the event as required by and in accordance with City insurance requirements or as otherwise determined necessary by the City Risk Manager.

F. All insurance must be issued by a company authorized and licensed to do business within the State of California and has a Best’s Insurance Rating of A-, VII, or better to be acceptable to the City.

G. City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District, the Moreno Valley Community Redevelopment Agency, and their officers, employees, and agents must be named as additional insured on all policies of insurance.

H. Applicant must provide City with insurance certificates and valid additional insured endorsements or other appropriate insurance binder 15 calendar days prior to the date of the sponsored event.

I. Applicant shall provide the City with a detailed accounting of all expenses and funds, in-kind donations, and/or other assistance collected for the organization and/or event within 90 days following the event. Failure to provide the required information would deem the organization and/or event ineligible for City sponsorship in the future.

IX. Sponsorship Not Subject To This Policy
This policy shall not apply to events or organizations that are specifically budgeted for in the City’s Annual Budget.

I.4.b
Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: Staff Report 6400 - Mini Packet (6579 : OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SPONSORSHIP PROGRAM- EVENT CHANGE) Report to City Council
ID#6587 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of the
Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Launa Jimenez, Chief Financial Officer
AGENDA DATE: April 2, 2024
TITLE: PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX

PROPERTY INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) - AMENDMENT
NO. 147

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

1. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2024-__, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended map for said District (Amendment No. 147) (Michael David Mottesheard & Michael Daniel Mottesheard located at 12547 & 12549 Lasselle St.).

SUMMARY
Adoption of the resolution (Attachment 1) will certify the annexation of 1 parcel into Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) (“District”). This action impacts only the property owners identified below, not the general citizens or taxpayers of the City.

DISCUSSION
As a condition of approval for the development projects identified below, the applicant is required to provide an ongoing funding source for maintenance of certain public facilities (e.g., parks). The funding is used to mitigate the cost of the impacts created by the proposed development.

I.5
Packet Pg. 38

Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record #s
Amendment
No. APN(s) Location
Michael David Mottesheard
& Michael Daniel Mottesheard
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
and Jr. ADU
BFR23-0033, BFR23-0062/SCP23-0070
147 479-411-001 12547 & 12549 Lasselle St.

On June 1, 2021, the CSD Board formed CFD No. 2021-01, pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982. The District was created to provide the development community with an alternative funding tool to mitigate the impacts of their proposed development. If a property owner elects to annex the parcel(s) of their development into the District, they also authorize the CSD to annually levy a special tax, collected on the annual property tax bill, against property in the development project. Thus, satisfying the condition of approval.

On December 21, 2021, the CSD Board adopted Ordinance No. 56, which designated the entire territory of the City as a future annexation area for the District. With the future annexation area designated, annexations can occur without an additional public hearing as long as the annexing landowner provides unanimous consent. Once annexed, parcels are subject to the annual special tax to fund the service they are receiving.

An applicant has two options to satisfy the condition(s) of approval:

1. The property owner submits a Landowner Petition unanimously approving annexation of the property into the District. Approval of the petition and special tax rate allows the City to annually levy the special tax on the property tax bill of the property. This option is only available if there are fewer than 12 registered voters living within the proposed annexation area; or

2. The applicant funds an endowment in an amount sufficient to yield an annual revenue stream that meets the annual obligation and provides for the ongoing operation and maintenance of parks facilities.

The Property Owners listed above elected to annex their property into CFD No. 2021-01 and have the special tax applied to the annual property tax bill. The Office of the Riverside County Registrar of Voters confirmed the number of registered voters residing at the property, allowing a special election of the landowner. Adoption of the resolution (Attachment 1) amends the District and adds the property to the tax rate area identified in the Fiscal Impact section of this report. The resolution also directs the recordation of the boundary map (Attachment 2) and amended notice of special tax lien for the amendment. The Election Official confirmed the Property Owners unanimously approved the annexation of their property into the District (Attachment 3).

ALTERNATIVES
I.5
Packet Pg. 39

1. Adopt the resolution. Staff recommends this alternative since it will annex the property into CFD No. 2021-01 at the request of the Property Owners and satisfy the condition of approval for the proposed development.

2. Do not adopt the resolution. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it is contrary to the request of the Property Owners, will not satisfy the condition of approval, and may delay development of the project.

3. Do not adopt the resolution but rather continue the item to a future regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will delay the Property Owners from satisfying the condition of approval and may delay development of the project.

FISCAL IMPACT
Revenue received from the special tax is restricted and can only be used to fund the services for each tax rate area within the District. The special tax can only be applied to a property tax bill of a parcel wherein the qualified electors (i.e., landowners or registered voters, depending upon the number of registered voters) have previously provided approval. If the projected revenue from the maximum special tax exceeds what is necessary to fund the services within the tax rate area, a lower amount will be applied to the property tax bill for all of the properties within the affected tax rate area. The maximum special tax rates are detailed below.

Property Owner(s)
Project
ACP Record #s
Amendment
No. Property Type
FY 2023/24
Maximum
Special Tax Rate
Michael David Mottesheard
& Michael Daniel Mottesheard
Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
and Jr. ADU
BFR23-0033, BFR23-0062/SCP23-0070
147 Single Family $335.22/unit
The maximum special tax rate is subject to an annual inflation adjustment based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or five percent (5%), whichever is greater.

However, the annual adjustment cannot be applied unless the CSD Board annually authorizes such adjustment. The increase to the maximum special tax rate cannot exceed the annual inflationary adjustment without a two-thirds approval of the qualified electors within the affected tax rate area.

NOTIFICATION
Subject Landowner Petition was emailed to the Property Owner on February 12, 2024.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
I.5
Packet Pg. 40

Prepared by: Department Head Approval:

Isa Rojas Launa Jimenez
Management Analyst Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer Concurred by:

Felicia London
Special Districts Division Manager
Concurred by:

Jeremy Bubnick
Parks & Community Services Director

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.

Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness. Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.

Objective 5.2: Promote the installation and maintenance of cost effective, low maintenance landscape, hardscape and other improvements which create a clean, inviting community.

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 147

2. Boundary Map - Amendment No. 147

3. Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 147

APPROVALS
I.5
Packet Pg. 41

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 7:49 AM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 8:59 AM
I.5
Packet Pg. 42
1 Resolution No. 2024-___
Date Adopted: April 2, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO

VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY

OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE

ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO MORENO VALLEY

COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS

MAINTENANCE) AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MAP

FOR SAID DISTRICT
WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. CSD 2021-22, Board established the Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities District No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) (the “CFD”), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq.) (the “Act”); and WHEREAS, by its Ordinance No. CSD 55, the Board authorized an annual special tax to be levied against all non-exempt parcels of real property within the CFD (the “Special Tax”) to fund parks maintenance services; and
WHEREAS, in order to permit landowners to efficiently annex developing parcels to the CFD, the Board, by its Ordinance No. CSD 56 designated the entire territory of the City of Moreno Valley as a future annexation area for the CFD; and WHEREAS, the landowner of the parcel listed on Exhibit A to this Resolution, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, has submitted to the District a petition requesting and approving annexation of the listed parcel (the “Annexation Parcel”) to the CFD; and
WHEREAS, the Annexation Parcel is comprised of the territory shown on the boundary map (the “Boundary Map”) entitled “Amendment No. 147 to Boundaries of Community Facilities District No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance), Moreno Valley Community Services District, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside, California” which is included as Exhibit B to this Resolution, and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to annex the Annexation Parcel to the CFD.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD FOR THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY

SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct and are herein incorporated.

2. Annexation Approved. The Annexation Parcel is hereby added to and part of the CFD with full legal effect and is subject to the Special Tax.

3. Description of Services. The following is a general description of the services (the “Services”) provided in the CFD:

I.5.a
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO 2 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: April 2, 2024
Maintaining, lighting, and operating parks and park improvements that are owned and operated by the CSD, to the extent such services are in addition to services already provided at the time CFD No. 2021-01 was created and do not supplant existing services.

Fundable services include (i) planting, replanting, mowing, trimming, irrigation and fertilization of grass, trees, shrubs, and other plants and vegetation, (ii) the operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of irrigation systems and lighting systems, and (iii) the operation maintenance, repair and replacement of any real property or improvements with a useful life of more than five years.

Fundable costs include, but are not limited to: (i) contracted costs for such services, (ii) salaries and benefits of staff, including park rangers, devoted to such services, (iii) expenses related to equipment, apparatus, and supplies related to these services, (iv) administrative and overhead costs, including staff time, associated with providing such services, and (v) lifecycle costs associated with the repair and replacement of facilities and improvements.

4. Amended Boundary Map. The Boundary Map attached hereto as Exhibit B is hereby approved. This map amends, and does not supersede, the existing maps of the CFD. The Board directs that said map be filed with the Riverside County Recorder pursuant to Section 3113 of the Streets and Highways Code.

5. Notice of Special Tax Lien. The Board directs that an amended notice of special tax lien be recorded pursuant to Section 3117.5 of the Streets and Highways Code with respect to the Annexation Parcel associated with the Boundary Map.

6. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.

7. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and shall maintain it on file as a public record this Resolution.

8. Severability. The Board declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

I.5.a
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO 3 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: April 2, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 2024.
_______________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity as President of the
Board for the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of Secretary of
the Moreno Valley Community
Services District
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________
City Attorney of the City of Moreno Valley,
acting in the capacity of General Counsel
of the Moreno Valley Community Services District
I.5.a
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO 4 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: April 2, 2024

RESOLUTION JURAT
I, Jane Halstead, Secretary of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, Moreno Valley, California do hereby certify that Resolution No. CSD 2024-____ was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors for the Moreno Valley Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 2nd day of April 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Boardmembers, Vice-President and President)
_________________________________

SECRETARY
(SEAL)
I.5.a
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO 5 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: April 2, 2024

EXHIBIT A
List of Annexation Parcel(s)
Amendment Map No. Assessor's Parcel Number
147 479-411-001
I.5.a
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO 6 Resolution No. CSD 2024-___
Date Adopted: April 2, 2024

EXHIBIT B
Boundary Map Amendment
I.5.a
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Resolution Ordering Annexation - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO SHEET 1 OF 1
27368 Via Industria, Suite 200Temecula, CA 92590(951) 587-3500

VICINITY MAP
AMENDMENT NO. 147 TO BOUNDARIES OF MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01
(PARKS MAINTENANCE)

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
(THIS MAP AMENDS, BY ADDING THE ADDITIONAL TERRITORY SHOWN HEREON, THE BOUNDARY MAP FOR MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PRIOR RECORDED AT BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS AT PAGE 95, IN THE OFFICE OF THECOUNTY RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.) FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY THIS _______ DAY OF____________________, 20___.________________________________________________________________________________________________CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THEMORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING AMENDED BOUNDARIES OF COMMUNITY FACILITIESDISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE), OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARDOF DIRECTORS OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AT A REGULAR MEETINGTHEREOF, HELD ON THE __________ DAY OF _______________________, 20______ BY ITS RESOLUTION NO.__________________.________________________________________________________________________________________________CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, ACTING IN THE CAPACITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THEMORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICTFILED THIS _______ DAY OF ____________________, 20___, AT THE HOUR OF ____________ O'CLOCK _______M. IN THE BOOK _________ PAGE(S) ___________ OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIESDISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. ________________________ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OFTHE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.________________________________________________________________________________________________COUNTY RECORDERCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDESTATE OF CALIFORNIAREFERENCE IS MADE TO THAT BOUNDARY MAP OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01(PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, RECORDED WITH THERIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE ON MAY 4, 2021 IN BOOK 86 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT ANDCOMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, PAGE 95 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0280004.REFERENCE IS FURTHER MADE TO ANNEXATION MAP NO. 4 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) OF THE MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, CITY OF MORENOVALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA (TERRITORY PROPOSED FOR ANNEXATION IN THEFUTURE, WITH THE CONDITION THAT PARCELS WITHIN THE TERRITORY MAY BE ANNEXED ONLY WITH THEUNANIMOUS APPROVAL OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS OF EACH PARCEL OR PARCELS AT THE TIME THATPARCEL OR THOSE PARCELS ARE ANNEXED) RECORDED WITH THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDER’SOFFICE ON OCTOBER 27, 2021 IN BOOK 87, PAGE 81 OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIESDISTRICTS AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0635742 WHICH DESIGNATED THE TERRITORY SHOWN HEREIN ASTERRITORY FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION TO THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REFERENCED THEREON.FOR PARTICULARS OF THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF ASSESSOR PARCELS, REFERENCE IS MADE TO THEMAPS OF THE ASSESSOR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE RIVERSIDE COUNTYASSESSOR'S MAPS SHALL GOVERN FOR ALL DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND DIMENSIONS OF SUCHLOTS OR PARCELS. «¬60

FIR AVE

PEACHLEAF ST

LASSELLE ST

NINEBARK ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD

SWEETLEAF ST

JUNEBERRY CT

BLUNTLEAF CT

BROADLEAF LN

HACKBERRY LN

MULBERRY LN
Legend
Annexation ParcelSurrounding Area Parcels
±
1 inch = 125 feet
479-
411-
001
¬«60 ¬«60

FIR AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE KITCHING ST

PERRIS BLVD

LASSELLE ST
SITE
I.5.b
Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Boundary Map - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX I.5.c
Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Certificate of Election Official - Amendment No. 147 (6587 : PURSUANT TO LANDOWNER PETITION, ANNEX PROPERTY INTO Report to City Council
ID#6569 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Melissa Walker, Public Works Director/City Engineer AGENDA DATE: April 2, 2024
TITLE: APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 STORM

WATER PROTECTION PROGRAM BUDGET FOR
COUNTY SERVICE AREA 152

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations:

1. Approve the County Service Area (CSA) 152 Budget for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/2025 in the amount $708,262; and

2. Authorize to continue the levy of the County Service Area 152 Assessment at the same rate as the prior year ($8.15) per Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU) for FY 2024/2025.

SUMMARY
This report recommends approval of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/2025 County Service Area 152 Budget in the amount of $708,262 and the authorization to continue the levy of the CSA 152 assessment at $8.15 per Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU), which is the same amount per BAU as last year. For the City to receive funding from the County, the City must prepare a CSA 152 Budget for submission to the County by April 5, 2024.

DISCUSSION
The County Service Area (CSA) 152 was formed by Riverside County to offset a portion of the costs of the federally mandated National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. The County continues to manage the CSA program and applies parcel charges on the property tax bills of parcels, which benefit from the services. The CSA 152 program, as administered by the County, allows for the collection of revenues on the property tax bills to support the NPDES program. The County is the lead agency in administering CSA 152, and the City is a participating agency. In order to continue I.6
Packet Pg. 51

with the service provided under CSA 152, the City is required to approve the CSA 152 budget for FY 2024/2025 in a specific amount (Attachment 1) and approve a CSA 152 Assessment per Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU) for FY 2024/2025.

The CSA 152 funds are eligible to use for the NPDES program (Program) costs identified on the attached. In addition to CSA 152 revenues, the City has other funding sources (e.g., an approved NPDES Parcel Charge), which are also eligible for specified Program costs. Staff is not recommending an increase of the BAU assessment beyond the previously approved amount of $8.15. Any increase to the BAU would require a mail ballot process under Proposition 218 and the approval of the property owners.

The County CSA 152 Administrative Services Agreement requires the City to adopt an annual CSA 152 Budget. To ensure the funding is secured and the assessment remains on the tax rolls for FY 2024/2025, staff is recommending Council adopt the CSA 152 budget as presented this evening. The County levies CSA 152 on the annual property tax bill on behalf of the City of Moreno Valley.

Failure by the City to enforce the NPDES program can result in penalties of up to $37,500 per day for noncompliance and/or civil and criminal penalties. This is a federally mandated program administered by the State. There has been neither State nor Federal monies specifically allocated to local agencies to address the program’s general requirements.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the CSA 152 Budget for FY 2024/2025 in the amount of $708,262 and authorize the levy of CSA 152 Assessment at $8.15 per BAU for FY 2024/2025.

Approval of this alternative ensures that a portion of the funds necessary to support the various storm water management and maintenance programs for the City will continue to be collected.

2. Do not approve the CSA 152 Budget for FY 2024/2025 in the amount of $708,262 and do not authorize the levy of CSA 152 Assessment at $8.15 per BAU for FY 2024/2025. This alternative does not provide for the collection of the assessment on the annual tax rolls to fund portions of the storm water management and maintenance programs. Not authorizing either the budget or levy will interrupt the assessment and revenue collection process. If the CSA assessment is not approved, another funding source such as the General Fund, would need to cover the expected $708,262 revenue because the Program is State mandated with no options to significantly reduce services without the possibility of State issued monetary penalties.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the recommended CSA 152 Budget and authorization of the annual levy will ensure that the City receives its authorized funding from this source. With the implementation of the federally mandated NPDES program, the City uses CSA 152 revenues together with other funding sources. The costs associated with the Program I.6
Packet Pg. 52

are included in the City approved Operating Budget. Approving the CSA 152 Budget will ensure this eligible funding source is available for specific Program costs. Funds collected from the CSA 152 annual levy are restricted for use only within the Storm Water Management programs.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Rae Beimer Melissa Walker, P.E.

Storm Water Program Manager Public Works Director/City Engineer Concurred By: Concurred By:

Clement Jimenez, P.E. Harold Zamora, P.E.

Principal Engineer Engineering Division Manager/Assistant City Engineer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Proposed CSA 152 Budget Detail FY 2024-2025

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 7:51 AM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

I.6
Packet Pg. 53

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 8:59 AM
I.6
Packet Pg. 54
CSA 152 Levy
Other City Funding
Sources

1. STREET SWEEPING $ 536,384.50 $ 208,951.48 $ 327,433.02

2. STORMDRAIN MAINTENANCE $ 177,104.67 $ 68,992.08 $ 108,112.59

3. NPDES MS4 ANNUAL PERMIT FEE $ 61,833.00 $ 24,087.38 $ 37,745.62

4. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL COST SHARE $ 67,141.92 $ 26,155.50 $ 40,986.42

5. TMDL TASK FORCE_TMDL COMPLIANCE $ 89,354.00 $ 34,808.33 $ 54,545.67

6. STORMWATER PROGRAM CONSULTANT $ 252,165.84 $ 98,232.57 $ 153,933.27

7. ADMINISTRATION_STAFF TIME $ 300,122.18 $ 116,914.22 $ 183,207.96

8. CSA 152 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION FEE $ 42,495.70 $ 16,554.43 $ 25,941.27

9. CSA 152 ANNUAL ANALYSIS_CONSULTANT $ 4,500.00 $ 1,753.00 $ 2,747.00

10. GENERAL OVERHEAD_ADMIN_ISF (FUNDS 2008/1010) $ 287,026.40 $ 111,812.69 $ 175,213.71 TOTAL PROJECTED $ 1,818,128.21 $ 708,261.68 $ 1,109,866.53 $ 8.15
87,010
$ 708,262 *
*Based on the assessed BAU rate of $8.14, not the Max Rate of $8.15.

Total BAUs
TOTAL PROJECTED CSA 152 BUDGET
Non-Fee Recovered Expenses
Benefit Assessment Unit (BAU) Max Rate
Revenues Source

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 CSA 152 - BUDGET DETAIL
I.6.a
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Proposed CSA 152 Budget Detail FY 2024-2025 [Revision 1] (6569 : APPROVAL OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/2025 STORM WATER Report to City Council
ID#6566 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Melissa Walker, Public Works Director/City Engineer AGENDA DATE: April 2, 2024
TITLE: PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) – APPROVE COOPERATIVE

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY

FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION

DISTRICT, THE CITY, AND HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW
OPERATING CO., FOR THE MORENO MASTER
DRAINAGE PLAN (MDP) LINE F, STAGE 4 AND MORENO
– LINE F LATERALS LOCATED ON FUTURE PACIFIC

GATEWAY BETWEEN EUCALYPTUS AVENUE AND
FUTURE BASIN F. DEVELOPER: HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW
OPERATING CO.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations:

1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the District), the City of Moreno Valley (the City), and Highland Fairview Operating Co. (the Developer), for the MDP Line F, Stage 4 and Moreno – Line F Laterals.

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Cooperative Agreement.

3. Direct the City Clerk to forward the signed Cooperative Agreement to the District.

SUMMARY
This report recommends approval of the Cooperative Agreement between the District, the City, and the Developer to allow for the construction of storm drain facilities. As part of the World Logistics Center Specific Plan, the City requires the developer to construct certain public improvements in order to provide flood protection and drainage as a result of the developer’s planned development. The Cooperative Agreement (Attachment 2) is I.7
Packet Pg. 56

the District’s mechanism by which the District, the City, and the Developer coordinate the construction and maintenance of master storm drain facilities.

DISCUSSION
The project is part of the World Logistics Center Specific Plan. The project site is located in the future Pacific Gateway between Eucalyptus Avenue and future Basin F (Attachment 1). The required storm drain facility for this project includes the construction of approximately 5,189 lineal feet of 12-foot wide by 8-foot high and 12-foot wide by 7- foot high reinforced concrete boxes (RCBs) and seven (7) laterals ranging in diameter from 42-inch to 48-inch reinforced concrete pipes (RCPs). The construction of the two (2) RCBs includes its associated wingwall outlet structure with grouted riprap energy dissipater, riprap slope lining, crushed rock, and concrete access ramp with turnaround.

This construction is required per the District’s Master Drainage Plan Line F, Stage 4 and Moreno – Line F Laterals. The District’s maintenance responsibility shall be the 12-foot wide by 8-foot high and 12-foot wide by 7-foot wide RCBs and seven (7) laterals ranging in diameter from 42-inch to 48-inch, which connect to their existing storm drain at the downstream end.

The Developer will be responsible for the design and construction of the project improvements. The Developer will prepare plans and specifications in accordance with the District’s and the City’s standards and submit improvement plans to the District and the City for review and approval. The City will review the plans and specifications, provide inspection for the construction, and accept responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the City’s drainage facilities, if the developer meets all requirements of the agreement. The District will review the plans and specifications, provide inspection for the construction, and accept ownership and responsibility for the maintenance of the District’s drainage facilities, if the developer meets all requirements of the agreement.

Prior to the construction of the facility or recordation of the final map, whichever occurs first, the Developer will be required to submit bonds for the improvements and execute an Agreement for Public Improvements, as approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer for PEN22-0169. The Agreement will include a Faithful Performance bond and Material and Labor bond for both the District’s drainage facility and the City’s drainage facility. The storm drain portion of the bonds will be held by the City until completion of the storm drain and acceptance of the storm drain improvements by the City and the District.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. Staff recommends this alternative as it will allow the project to construct master drainage plan storm drain facilities.

2. Do not approve and do not authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will not allow the project to construct master drainage plan storm drain facilities.

I.7
Packet Pg. 57

FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impact is anticipated.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Jordan Koga, P.E. Melissa Walker, P.E.

Storm Water Program Consultant Public Works Director/City Engineer Concurred By: Concurred By:

Clement Jimenez, P.E. Harold Zamora, P.E.

Principal Engineer Engineering Division Manager/Assistant City Engineer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Public Facilities and Capital Projects. Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Vicinity Map - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1)

2. Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1)

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 7:53 AM
I.7
Packet Pg. 58

City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 9:00 AM
I.7
Packet Pg. 59

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - LAND DEVELOPMENT
PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1)
Final Map
I.7.a
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Vicinity Map - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) – APPROVE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT) 254754
- 1 -

COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
Moreno Master Drainage Plan – Line F, Stage 4
Moreno – Line F Laterals
Project Nos. 4-0-00752 and 4-0-00738
Miscellaneous No. 210
This Cooperative Agreement ("Agreement"), dated as of ___________________, is entered into by and between, the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, a body corporate and politic, ("DISTRICT"), the City of Moreno Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of California ("CITY"), and Highland Fairview Operating Co., a California general partnership ("DEVELOPER"). DISTRICT, CITY, and DEVELOPER individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively referred to herein as "Parties." The Parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

RECITALS
A. DEVELOPER is the legal owner of record of certain real property located within the city of Moreno Valley. The legal description of Miscellaneous No. 210 is provided in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and B. DEVELOPER has submitted for approval Miscellaneous No. 210, related to the property, which is located in the incorporated area in the city of Moreno Valley. As a condition of approval for Miscellaneous No. 210, DEVELOPER must construct certain flood control facilities in order to provide flood protection and drainage for DEVELOPER's planned development; and
C. The required flood control facilities and drainage improvements related to Miscellaneous No. 210, identified in DISTRICT's Moreno Master Drainage Plan ("MDP"), are shown on DISTRICTꞌs Drawing No. 4-1235 and shown in concept on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and include the construction of the following:

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 2 -
(i). Moreno Master Drainage Plan – Line F, Stage 4 ("LINE F STAGE 4"), consists of approximately 5,189 lineal feet of 12'W x 8'H and 12'W x 7'H reinforced concrete box, including its associated wingwall outlet structure with grouted riprap energy dissipater, riprap slope lining, crushed rock and concrete access ramp with turnaround.

At its downstream terminus, LINE F STAGE 4 will drain to the proposed detention basin. At its upstream terminus, LINE F STAGE 4 will connect to DISTRICT's existing Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 3 facility, as shown on DISTRICT's Drawing No. 4-1007; and (ii). Moreno – Line F Laterals ("LINE F LATERALS"), consists of seven (7) laterals ranging in diameter from 42-inch to 48-inch reinforced concrete pipes; and
(iii). All safety devices requested by DISTRICT staff during the course of project construction and during any final field inspections, including but not limited to concrete pads, slope protection barriers, signage and fencing ("SAFETY DEVICES"). SAFETY DEVICES shall be purchased and installed by DEVELOPER's contractor, and subject to DISTRICT's inspection and approval; and
D. Together, LINE F STAGE 4, LINE F LATERALS and SAFETY DEVICES, are hereinafter called "DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES"; and E. Associated with the construction of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES includes the construction of certain inlets, curbs and gutters, catch basins and various lateral storm drains within CITY right of way that are 36 inches or less in diameter, hereinafter called ("CITY FACILITIES").

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 3 -
F. Associated with the construction of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and CITY FACILITIES includes the construction of certain lateral storm drains ranging in diameter from 18-inch to 48-inch, located within Miscellaneous No. 210 boundary within DEVELOPER's held right of way or easements, hereinafter called "DEVELOPER FACILITIES." DEVELOPER FACILITIES are to be initially owned and maintained by DEVELOPER and subsequently owned and maintained by the Property Owners for Miscellaneous No. 210. In the event (i) DEVELOPER does not transfer ownership, operation, and maintenance to the Property Owners, or (ii) DEVELOPER dissolves, CITY shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of DEVELOPER FACILITIES identified on DISTRICT Drawing No. 4-1235; and G. Together, DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, CITY FACILITIES and DEVELOPER FACILITIES are hereinafter called "PROJECT"; and H. DEVELOPER and CITY desire DISTRICT to accept ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES; and I. DEVELOPER and DISTRICT desire CITY to accept ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of CITY FACILITIES; and J. DISTRICT is willing to accept ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES provided DEVELOPER performs all of the following: (i) complies with this Agreement, (ii) prepares PROJECT plans in accordance with DISTRICT and CITY approved plans and specifications and this Agreement, (iii) constructs PROJECT in accordance with DISTRICT and CITY approved plans and specifications and this Agreement, (iv) obtains and conveys to DISTRICT and CITY the necessary right of way for the inspection, operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and CITY FACILITIES, and (v) accepts ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT following completion of PROJECT construction until I.7.b
Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 4 -
such time as DISTRICT accepts ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and CITY accepts ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of CITY FACILITIES ;and
K. CITY is willing to (i) review and approve, in conjunction with DISTRICT, DEVELOPER's plans and specifications for PROJECT, (ii) accept and hold faithful performance and payment bonds submitted by DEVELOPER on behalf of DISTRICT for DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and CITY for CITY FACILITIES, (iii) inspect the construction of PROJECT, (iv) grant DISTRICT the right to inspect, operate and maintain DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES within CITY right of way, (v) convey to DISTRICT the necessary right of way for the inspection, operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, and (vi) accept ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of CITY FACILITIES, provided PROJECT is constructed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by DISTRICT and CITY.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the preceding recitals and the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the Parties hereto mutually agree that the above recitals are true and correct and incorporated into the terms of this Agreement and as follows:

SECTION I
DEVELOPER shall:

1. Prepare PROJECT plans and specifications, hereinafter called "IMPROVEMENT PLANS", in accordance with applicable DISTRICT and CITY standards, and submit to DISTRICT and CITY for their respective review and approval.

2. Continue to pay DISTRICT, within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of periodic billings from DISTRICT, any and all such amounts as are deemed reasonably necessary by DISTRICT to cover DISTRICT's costs associated with (i) the review of I.7.b
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 5 -
IMPROVEMENT PLANS, (ii) the review and approval of right of way and conveyance documents, (iii) the processing and administration of this Agreement, and (iv) construction inspection costs. Additionally, DEVELOPER shall pay CITY, within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of periodic billings from CITY, any and all such amounts deemed reasonably necessary by CITY to cover CITY's costs associated with (i) the review and approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, (ii) the review and approval of right of way and conveyance documents, (iii) the processing and administration of this Agreement, and (iv) construction inspection costs.

3. By execution of this Agreement, grant DISTRICT and CITY the right to enter upon DEVELOPER's property where necessary and convenient for the purpose of gaining access to and performing inspection services for the construction of PROJECT as set forth herein.

4. Upon execution of this Agreement or not less than twenty (20) calendar days prior to recordation of the final map for Miscellaneous No. 210 or any phase thereof, whichever occurs first, provide CITY with faithful performance and payment bonds in accordance with CITY's municipal code including any amendments thereto, for the estimated cost for construction of (i) DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES as determined by DISTRICT and (ii) CITY FACILITIES as determined by CITY. The surety, amount and form of the bonds, shall list CITY as an obligee and shall be subject to approval of DISTRICT (Attention: Contract Services Section) and CITY. The bonds shall remain in full force and effect until DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES are accepted by DISTRICT as complete and CITY FACILITIES are accepted by CITY as complete. Both bonds shall be subscribed by an Admitted Surety Insurer, which is authorized to transact surety insurance business in the State of California with a policy holder's rating of A or higher and a Financial Class of VIII or larger. Should any bond or surety become I.7.b
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 6 -
insufficient, DEVELOPER shall furnish a new bond within ten (10) calendar days after receiving notice from CITY.

5. Upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, deposit with DISTRICT (Attention: Business Office – Accounts Receivable), and notify Contract Services Section, the estimated cost of providing construction inspection for DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, in an amount as determined and approved by DISTRICT in accordance with County of Riverside Ordinance Nos. 671 and 749, including any amendments thereto, based upon the bonded value of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

6. Upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, furnish DISTRICT (Attention: Contract Services Section), with a complete list of all contractors and subcontractors to be performing work on PROJECT, including the corresponding license number and license classification of each. At such time, DEVELOPER shall further identify in writing its designated superintendent for PROJECT construction.

7. Upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, Furnish DISTRICT (Attention: Contract Services Section), with a construction schedule which shall show the order and dates in which DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER's contractor proposes to carry out the various parts of work, including estimated start and completion dates. As construction of PROJECT progresses, DEVELOPER shall update said construction schedule as requested by DISTRICT.

8. Upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, furnish DISTRICT (Attention: Contract Services Section), with a confined space entry procedure specific to PROJECT. The procedure shall comply with requirements contained in California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5158, Other Confined Space Operations, Section 5157, Permit Required Confined Space and District Confined Space Procedures, SOM-18. The I.7.b
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 7 -
procedure shall be reviewed and approved by DISTRICT prior to the issuance of a Notice to Proceed, which shall be given by DISTRICT to DEVELOPER upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval.

9. Upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, an original certificate of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage shall be provided to DISTRICT (Attention: Contract Services Section) and CITY. At minimum, the procured insurance coverages should adhere to DISTRICTꞌs required insurance provided in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and made a part hereof. DEVELOPER shall not commence construction until DISTRICT (Attention: Contract Services Section) and CITY have been furnished with original certificate(s) of insurance and original certified copies of endorsements and if requested, certified original policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all other attachments.

Failure to maintain the insurance required by this paragraph shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement and shall authorize and constitute authority for DISTRICT, at its sole discretion, to provide written notice to DEVELOPER that DISTRICT is unable to perform its obligations hereunder, nor to accept responsibility for ownership, operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES due, either in whole or in part, to said breach of this Agreement.

10. Upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, or not less than twenty (20) calendar days prior to recordation of the final map for Miscellaneous No. 210 or any phase thereof, whichever occurs first, furnish DISTRICT (Attention: Plan Check Section) and CITY with sufficient evidence of DEVELOPER securing the necessary licenses, agreements, permits, approvals, rights of way, rights of entry and temporary construction easements, as may be needed for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of PROJECT as determined and approved by DISTRICT and CITY.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 8 -

11. Upon DISTRICT's and CITY's approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS and prior to the start on any portion of PROJECT construction, obtain and provide DISTRICT (Attention: Plan Check Section), with duly executed Irrevocable Offers(s) of Dedication to the public for flood control and drainage purposes, including ingress and egress, for the right of way deemed necessary by DISTRICT for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES. The Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication shall be in a form approved by DISTRICT and shall be executed by all legal and equitable owners of the property described in the offer(s).

12. Upon submitting the Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication as set forth in Section I.11., furnish DISTRICT (Attention: Plan Check Section) with Preliminary Reports on Title dated not more than thirty (30) calendar days prior to date of submission of all the property described in the Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication.

13. Prior to the start on any portion of PROJECT construction, furnish DISTRICT (Attention: Plan Check Section) and CITY each with a set of final mylar plans of PROJECT and assign their ownership to DISTRICT and CITY, respectively.

14. After receiving DISTRICT's plan check and administrative clearance for PROJECT construction as set forth in Sections I.1 through I.13, notify DISTRICT (Attention:

Construction Management Section) and CITY with twenty (20) calendar days written notice of intent to start of construction of PROJECT, and include PROJECT's Geotechnical Firm, Concrete Lab/Test Firm, D-Load test forms, Trench Shoring/False Work Calculations, Concrete Mix designs for DISTRICT's review and approval. Construction shall not begin on any element of PROJECT, for any reason whatsoever, until DISTRICT and CITY have issued to DEVELOPER a written Notice to Proceed authorizing DEVELOPER to commence construction of PROJECT.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 9 -
DISTRICT reserves the right to withhold issuance of the Notice to Proceed in accordance with Section IV.4.

15. Prior to commencing construction, furnish DISTRICT (Attention: Plan Check Section) and CITY with copies of all permits, approvals or agreements required by any federal, state or local resource and/or regulatory agency for the construction of PROJECT. Such documents include, but are not limited to, those issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, California Regional Water Quality Control Board, California State Department of Fish and Wildlife, State Water Resources Control Board and Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ("REGULATORY PERMITS").

16. Prior to commencing construction, submit all environmental documentation and applications related to the operation and maintenance ("ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS") of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES to DISTRICT (Attn:

Regulatory Section IV) for review and approval to ensure that any environmental conditions (i.e., CEQA mitigation measures, permit terms and conditions, etc.) imposed on the PROJECT will not have a negative impact on operations and maintenance of future DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES. If routine maintenance actions required by the DISTRICT for DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES is not specified in the REGULATORY PERMITS, such as mowing, sediment removal, etc., DEVELOPER shall obtain the requisite regulatory approvals that covers the DISTRICT's operations and maintenance activities needed to maintain DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES to the satisfaction of the DISTRICT.

17. Not permit any change to or modification of DISTRICT and CITY approved IMPROVEMENT PLANS without the prior written permission and consent of DISTRICT and CITY.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 10 -

18. Comply with all Cal/OSHA safety regulations including, but not limited to, regulations concerning confined space and maintain a safe working environment for DEVELOPER, DISTRICT and CITY employees on the site.

19. Upon receipt of DISTRICT's written Notice to Proceed, construct or cause to be constructed, PROJECT at DEVELOPER's sole cost and expense, in accordance with DISTRICT and CITY approved IMPROVEMENT PLANS.

20. Within two (2) weeks of completing PROJECT construction, provide DISTRICT (Attention: Construction Management Section) and CITY with written notice that PROJECT construction is substantially complete, and request (i) DISTRICT conduct a final inspection of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and (ii) CITY conduct a final inspection of CITY FACILITIES.

21. Upon completion of PROJECT construction, and upon acceptance by CITY of all right of way deemed necessary by DISTRICT and CITY for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT, but prior to DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES for ownership, operation and maintenance, convey or cause to be conveyed to CITY the flood control easement(s), including ingress and egress, in a form approved by DISTRICT, to the right of way as shown in concept in cross-hatched on Exhibit "D", attached hereto and made a part hereof. The easement(s) or grant deed(s) shall be in a form approved by both DISTRICT and CITY and shall be executed by all legal and equitable owners of the property(ies) described in the easement(s) or grant deed(s).

22. At the time of recordation of the conveyance document(s) as set forth in Section I.20, furnish DISTRICT with policies of title insurance, each in the amount of not less than (i) fifty percent (50%) of the estimated fee value as determined by DISTRICT for each easement parcel to be conveyed to DISTRICT; or (ii) one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated I.7.b
Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 11 -
value as determined by DISTRICT for each fee parcel to be conveyed to DISTRICT, guaranteeing DISTRICT's interest in said parcel(s) as being free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, assessments, easements, taxes and leases (recorded or unrecorded), and except those which in the sole discretion of DISTRICT are acceptable.

23. Upon completion of PROJECT construction, accept ownership, sole responsibility and all liability whatsoever for the ownership, operation and maintenance of DEVELOPER FACILITIES until such time as the Property Owners accepts ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of DEVELOPER FACILITIES. Additionally, DEVELOPER shall accept ownership, sole responsibility and all liability whatsoever for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT until such time as (i) DISTRICT accepts ownership and responsibility for operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES; and (ii) CITY accepts ownership and responsibility for operation and maintenance of CITY FACILITIES.

DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES shall be in a satisfactorily maintained condition as solely determined by DISTRICT. If, subsequent to the inspection and in the sole discretion of DISTRICT, DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES is not in an acceptable condition, corrections shall be made at sole expense of DEVELOPER. DEVELOPER shall continue to be responsible to own, operate and maintain DEVELOPER FACILITIES.

24. Prior to acceptance of any DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, and if considered jurisdictional, obtain all necessary permits, approvals, or agreement, for the continuing operation and maintenance ("ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS"), for DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, as required by any Federal, State, or local resource and/or regulatory agency. This requirement shall apply even if permits were not required for construction.

ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS include but are not limited to those issued by the U.S.

Army Corps of Engineers, State Water Resources Control Board, Regional Water Quality Control I.7.b
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 12 -
Board, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority or the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission, collectively and individually referred to as REGULATORY AGENCY(IES). DISTRICT will not accept DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES until the ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS have been reviewed and deemed acceptable to DISTRICT. DEVELOPER is required to provide DISTRICT with copies of each permit application prior to submitting to the respective REGULATORY AGENCY(IES), and prior to accepting or executing the ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS, as this will avoid receiving a permit with terms and conditions that are deemed unacceptable to the DISTRICT.

25. Not cause the ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS to conflict with the DISTRICT's ability to operate and maintain DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES. If the DEVELOPER provides ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS that are deemed unacceptable to the DISTRICT, the DEVELOPER may be required to update or amend them prior to DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

26. Upon completion of PROJECT construction but prior to DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES for ownership, operation and maintenance, provide or cause its civil engineer of record or construction civil engineer of record, duly registered in the State of California, to provide DISTRICT (Attention: Construction Management Section), with (i) soil compaction report(s) – stamped and wet signed by the geotechnical engineer, (ii) concrete testing report(s) – stamped and wet signed by the civil engineer of record, and (iii) a redlined "record drawings" copy of IMPROVEMENT PLANS . After DISTRICT approval of the redlined "record drawings", DEVELOPER's engineer shall schedule with DISTRICT a time to transfer the redlined changes onto DISTRICT's original mylars at I.7.b
Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 13 -
DISTRICT's office; after which, the engineer shall review, stamp and sign the original IMPROVEMENT PLANS as "record drawings."

27. Ensure that all work performed pursuant to this Agreement by DEVELOPER, its agents or contractors is done in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations including, but not limited to, all applicable provisions of the Labor Code, Business and Professions Code and Water Code. DEVELOPER shall be solely responsible for all costs associated with compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

28. Pay, if suit is brought upon this Agreement or any bond guaranteeing the completion of PROJECT, all costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, and acknowledge that, upon entry of judgment, all such costs, expenses and fees shall be computed as costs and included in any judgment rendered.

SECTION II
DISTRICT shall:

1. Review IMPROVEMENT PLANS and approve when DISTRICT has determined that such plans meet DISTRICT standards and are found acceptable to DISTRICT prior to the start of PROJECT construction.

2. Provide CITY an opportunity to review and approve IMPROVEMENT PLANS prior to DISTRICT's final approval.

3. Upon execution of this Agreement, record or cause to be recorded a copy of this Agreement in the Official Records of the Riverside County Recorder.

4. Record or cause to be recorded the Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication provided by DEVELOPER pursuant to Section I.11.

5. Endeavor to issue DEVELOPER a Notice to Proceed within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of DEVELOPER's complete written notice of intent to start of I.7.b
Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 14 -
construction of PROJECT as set forth in Section I.14.; however, DISTRICT's construction inspection staff is limited and, therefore, the issuance of a Notice to Proceed is subject to staff availability.

6. Reserve the right to withhold issuance of the Notice to Proceed pursuant to Section IV.4.

7. Allow DEVELOPER to proceed with the construction of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES without the necessary ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS in place, provided DEVELOPER submits its ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS as set forth in Section I.16.

8. Review, and if applicable, comment on (i) ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS prior to DEVELOPER submitting to the REGULATORY AGENCY(IES), and (ii) any draft ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS prior to the DEVELOPER executing or accepting the ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS. DISTRICT's review is necessary to avoid receiving permits with terms and conditions that may not be acceptable to DISTRICT.

9. Upon review of the ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT APPLICATIONS, DISTRICT reserves the right to request the relevant environmental permits if routine maintenance actions required by the DISTRICT are not specified in the ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS for DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

10. Inspect construction of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

11. Keep an accurate accounting and submit periodic invoices to DEVELOPER of all DISTRICT costs associated with (i) the review and approval of IMPROVEMENT PLANS, (ii) the review and approval of right of way and conveyance documents, and (iii) the processing and administration of this Agreement.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 15 -

12. Keep an accurate accounting of all DISTRICT construction inspection costs and within forty-five (45) calendar days after DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES as being complete, submit a final cost statement to DEVELOPER. If the deposit as set forth in Section I.5. exceeds such inspection costs, DISTRICT shall reimburse DEVELOPER the excess amount within sixty (60) calendar days after DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES as being complete.

13. Upon (i) DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT construction as being complete, and (ii) DISTRICT receipt of stamped and signed "record drawing" of IMPROVEMENT PLAN as set forth in Section I.26., provide DEVELOPER with a reproducible duplicate copy of "record drawings" of IMPROVEMENT PLANS.

14. Prior to DISTRICT acceptance of ownership and responsibility for the operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES shall be in a satisfactorily maintained condition as solely determined by DISTRICT.

If, subsequent to any inspection and, in the sole discretion of DISTRICT, DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES are not in an acceptable condition, corrections shall be made at sole expense of DEVELOPER.

15. Upon completion of PROJECT construction, and upon acceptance by CITY of all right of way deemed necessary by DISTRICT and CITY for the operation and maintenance of PROJECT, but prior to DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES for ownership, operation, and maintenance, convey, or cause to be conveyed to CITY the flood control easement(s) including ingress and egress, in a form approved by DISTRICT.

16. Accept ownership and sole responsibility for the operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES upon (i) DISTRICT inspection of I.7.b
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 16 -
DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES in accordance with Section I.20., (ii) DISTRICT acceptance of PROJECT construction as being complete; (iii) DISTRICT receipt of stamped and signed "record drawings" of PROJECT plans as set forth in Section I.26., (iv) recordation of all conveyance documents described in Section I.21., (v) receipt of all required policies of title insurance described in Section I.22., (vi) DISTRICT receipt of the ONGOING REGULATORY PERMITS for DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES described in Sections I.24. and I.25., (vii) DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES fully functioning as a flood control drainage system as solely determined by DISTRICT, and (viii) DISTRICT's sole determination that DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES are in a satisfactorily maintained condition.

17. Upon both of the following: DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and DISTRICT receipt of stamped and signed "record drawings" of IMPROVEMENT PLANS as set forth in Section I.26., provide CITY with (i) a reproducible duplicate copy of "record drawings" of constructed DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, (ii) a written notice that PROJECT is complete, and (iii) request CITY to release bonds held for DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and CITY FACILITIES.

SECTION III
CITY shall:

1. Review IMPROVEMENT PLANS and approve when CITY has
determined that such plans meet CITY standards and are found acceptable to CITY prior to the start of PROJECT construction.

2. Accept CITY and DISTRICT approved faithful performance and payment bonds submitted by DEVELOPER, which meet the requirements of CITY municipal code or ordinances, including any amendments thereto, as set forth in Section I.4., for the estimated cost for construction of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES as determined by DISTRICT and CITY I.7.b
Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 17 -
FACILITIES as determined by CITY and hold said bonds as provided in this Agreement. The bonds shall list CITY as obligee and be subject to the approval of DISTRICT (Attention: Contract Services Section) and CITY. The bonds shall remain in full force and effect until DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES are accepted by DISTRICT and CITY FACILITIES are accepted by CITY as complete. Both bonds shall be subscribed by an Admitted Surety Insurer, which is authorized to transact surety insurance business in the State of California with a policy holder's rating of A or higher and a Financial Class of VIII or larger. Should any bond or surety become insufficient, DEVELOPER shall furnish a new bond within ten (10) calendar days after receiving notice from CITY. CITY shall not release said bonds until DISTRICT provides CITY with a reproducible duplicate copy of "record drawings" and written notification that the PROJECT is complete, as set forth in Section II.14.

3. Request DEVELOPER update the construction schedule as deemed necessary.

4. By execution of this Agreement, grant DISTRICT the right to inspect, operate and maintain DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES within CITY right of way.

5. By execution of this Agreement, consent to DISTRICT recording of any Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication furnished by DEVELOPER pursuant to this Agreement.

6. As requested by DISTRICT, accept the Irrevocable Offer(s) of Dedication as set forth herein and any other outstanding offers of dedication necessary for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES and convey sufficient right of way to DISTRICT to allow DISTRICT to construct, inspect, operate and maintain DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES.

7. Inspect PROJECT construction.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 18 -

8. Upon completion of PROJECT construction but prior to DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES for ownership, operation and maintenance, convey or cause to be conveyed to DISTRICT the flood control easement(s), including ingress and egress, to the right of way as shown in concept in "cross-hatched" on Exhibit "D."

9. Accept ownership and sole responsibility for the operation and maintenance of CITY FACILITIES upon (i) DISTRICT acceptance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES for ownership, operation and maintenance, (ii) CITY's final inspection of CITY FACILITIES, and (iii) CITY's sole determination that CITY FACILITIES are in a satisfactorily maintained condition.

10. Release occupancy permits in accordance with the approved conditions of approval for Miscellaneous No. 210.

11. Upon DISTRICT and CITY acceptance of PROJECT construction as being complete, accept sole responsibility for the adjustment of all PROJECT manhole rings and covers located within CITY right of way which must be performed at such time(s) that the finished grade along and above the underground portions of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES are improved, repaired, replaced or changed. It being further understood and agreed that any such adjustments shall be performed by CITY at no cost to DISTRICT.

SECTION IV
It is further mutually agreed:

1. DISTRICT may withhold acceptance for ownership and sole responsibility for the operation and maintenance of DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES unless and until DEVELOPER performs all obligations under this Agreement.

2. All construction work involved with PROJECT shall be inspected by DEVELOPER, DISTRICT and CITY but shall not be deemed complete until DISTRICT and I.7.b
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 19 -
CITY mutually agree in writing that construction of PROJECT is completed in accordance with DISTRICT and CITY approved IMPROVEMENT PLANS.

3. DISTRICT and CITY personnel may observe and inspect all work being done on DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES but shall provide any comments to DISTRICT personnel who shall be solely responsible for all quality control communications with DEVELOPER's contractor(s) during the construction of PROJECT.

4. If DEVELOPER fails to commence construction of PROJECT within twenty-four (24) consecutive months after execution of this Agreement, then DISTRICT reserves the right to withhold issuance of the Notice to Proceed after this period of time pending a review of the existing site conditions as they exist at the time DEVELOPER provides written notification to DISTRICT of the start of construction as set forth in Section I.14. In the event of a change in the existing site conditions that materially affects PROJECT function or DISTRICT's ability to operate and maintain DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES, DISTRICT may require DEVELOPER to modify IMPROVEMENT PLANS as deemed necessary by DISTRICT.

5. DEVELOPER shall complete construction of PROJECT within twelve (12) months after commencement of construction of PROJECT, unless CITY and DISTRICT agree to extend the time to complete construction. Failure of DEVELOPER to perform the work within the agreed upon time shall constitute authority for (i) DISTRICT to terminate the Agreement and (ii) CITY to perform the remaining work on PROJECT and require DEVELOPER's surety to pay to CITY the penal sum of any and all bonds. Should CITY perform the remaining work on PROJECT under this section, DEVELOPER grants to CITY and CITY's officers, deputies, employees, agents, representatives, contractors and other designees the irrevocable permission to enter upon the Miscellaneous No. 210. to complete construction and remaining work on PROJECT. This right of entry shall terminate when such construction and I.7.b
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 20 -
remaining work is complete. CITY shall subsequently reimburse DISTRICT from the funds paid by DEVELOPER's surety for any DISTRICT costs incurred.

6. In the event DEVELOPER wishes to expedite issuance of a Notice to Proceed, DEVELOPER may elect to furnish an independent qualified construction inspector at DEVELOPER's sole cost and expense. DEVELOPER shall furnish appropriate documentation of the individual's credentials and experience to DISTRICT for review and, if appropriate, approval. DISTRICT shall review the individual's qualifications and experience, and upon approval thereof, said individual, hereinafter called "DEPUTY INSPECTOR", shall be authorized to act on DISTRICT's behalf on all DISTRICT DRAINAGE FACILITIES construction and quality control matters. If DEVELOPER's initial construction inspection deposit furnished pursuant to Section I.5. exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000), DISTRICT shall refund to DEVELOPER up to eighty percent (80%) of DEVELOPER's initial inspection deposit within forty-five (45) calendar days of DISTRICT's approval of DEPUTY INSPECTOR; however, a minimum balance of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) shall be retained on account.

7. PROJECT construction work shall be on a five (5) day, forty (40) hour work week with no work on Saturdays, Sundays or DISTRICT or CITY designated legal holidays, unless otherwise approved in writing by DISTRICT and CITY. If DEVELOPER feels it is necessary to work more than the normal forty (40) hour work week or on DISTRICT or CITY designated legal holidays, DEVELOPER shall make a written request for permission from DISTRICT and CITY to work the additional hours. The request shall be submitted to DISTRICT and CITY at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the requested additional work hours and state the reasons for the overtime and the specific time frames required. The decision of granting permission for overtime work shall be made by DISTRICT and CITY at their sole discretion and shall be final. If permission is granted by DISTRICT and CITY, DEVELOPER will be charged I.7.b
Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 21 -
the cost incurred at the overtime rates for additional inspection time required in connection with the overtime work in accordance with CITY municipal codes or ordinances, including any amendments thereto.

8. DEVELOPER shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless and require DEVELOPER's construction contractor(s) to indemnify, defend and hold harmless DISTRICT, the County of Riverside, and CITY (including each of their respective Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives) (individually and collectively hereinafter referred to as "Indemnitees")) from any liability, action, claim or damage whatsoever, based or asserted upon any acts, omissions, or services of DEVELOPER and/or DEVELOPER's construction contractor(s), (including their respective officers, employees, subcontractors, agents or representatives) (individually and collectively hereinafter referred to as "Indemnitors")) arising out of or in any way relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to property damage, bodily injury, or death or any other element of any kind or nature whatsoever. DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER's construction contractor(s) shall defend, at its sole expense, the Indemnitees, including all costs and fees, (including, but not limited, to attorney fees, cost of investigation, defense and settlements or awards), in any claim or action based upon such alleged acts or omissions. All applicable indemnification provisions of this Agreement shall remain in effect following the termination of the Agreement.

9. With respect to any action or claim subject to indemnification herein by DEVELOPER, DEVELOPER shall, at its sole cost, have the right to use counsel of its own choice and may adjust, settle, or compromise any such action or claim only with the prior consent of DISTRICT, the County of Riverside or CITY. Any such adjustment, settlement or compromise I.7.b
Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 22 -
shall not in any manner whatsoever limit or circumscribe DEVELOPER's indemnification obligations to Indemnitees as set forth herein.

10. DEVELOPER's and DEVELOPER's construction contractor(s) indemnification obligation hereunder shall be satisfied when DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER's construction contractor(s) has provided to DISTRICT, the County of Riverside and CITY the appropriate form of dismissal relieving DISTRICT, the County of Riverside or CITY from any liability for the action or claim involved.

11. The specified insurance limits required in this Agreement shall in no way limit or circumscribe DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER's construction contractor(s) obligations to indemnify and hold harmless Indemnitees from third party claims.

12. In the event there is conflict between this section and California Civil Code Section 2782, this section shall be interpreted to comply with California Civil Code Section 2782.

Such interpretation shall not relieve DEVELOPER or DEVELOPER's construction contractor(s) from indemnifying Indemnitees to the fullest extent allowed by law.

13. DEVELOPER for itself, its successors and assigns hereby releases DISTRICT, the County of Riverside and CITY (including each of their respective Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives) from any and all claims, demands, actions, or suits of any kind arising out of any liability, known or unknown, present or future, including but not limited to any claim or liability, based or asserted, pursuant to Article I, Section 19 of the California Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seeks to impose any other liability or damage, whatsoever, for damage caused by the discharge of drainage within or from PROJECT. Nothing contained herein shall constitute a release of DEVELOPER by DISTRICT, County of Riverside, I.7.b
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 23 -
or CITY, (including each of their respective Agencies, Districts, Special Districts and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives) from any and all claims, demands, actions or suits of any kind arising out of any liability, known or unknown, present or future, for the negligent maintenance of PROJECT by DEVELOPER after the acceptance of PROJECT by DISTRICT and CITY, as described in this Agreement.

14. Any waiver by any Party hereto of any breach of any one or more of the terms of this Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver of any subsequent or other breach of the same or of any other term hereof. Failure on the part of any Party hereto to require exact, full and complete compliance with any terms of this Agreement shall not be construed as in any manner changing the terms hereof or estopping such Party from enforcement hereof.

15. Any and all notices sent or required to be sent to the Parties of this Agreement will be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses:

To DISTRICT:

To CITY:

To DEVELOPER:

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
1995 Market Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Attn: Contracts Services Section

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Attn: Clement Jimenez
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW OPERATING CO.
14225 Corporate Parkway
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Attn: Bobby Kohltfarber

16. This Agreement is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. If any provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to I.7.b
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 24 -
be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force and effect without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

17. Any action at law or in equity brought by any of the Parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by the Agreement, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of California, and the Parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceedings to any other county.

18. This Agreement is the result of negotiations between the Parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this Agreement was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no importance or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this Agreement shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this Agreement in its final form.

19. The provisions of this Agreement are solely for the benefit of the Parties, and not for the benefit of any third party. Accordingly, no third party shall have any right or action based on the provisions of this Agreement.

20. The rights and obligations of DEVELOPER shall inure to and be binding upon all heirs, successors and assignees.

21. No Party shall assign this Agreement without the written consent of all other Parties. Any attempt to delegate or assign any interest herein without written consent of all other Parties shall be deemed void and of no effect.

22. In the event DEVELOPER sells Miscellaneous No. 210, DEVELOPER shall notify DISTRICT and CITY of any such transfer or assignment in writing no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the sale. DEVELOPER expressly understands and agrees that it shall remain liable with respect to any and all of the obligations and duties in this Agreement until DISTRICT, CITY, DEVELOPER and the new owner(s) of Miscellaneous No. 210 fully I.7.b
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 25 -
execute an assignment and assumption agreement that transfers all DEVELOPER's rights, duties or obligations in this Agreement to the new owner(s) of Miscellaneous No. 210.

23. The individual(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of DEVELOPER certify that they have the authority within their respective company(ies) to enter into and execute this Agreement and have been authorized to do so by all boards of directors, legal counsel, and/or any other board, committee or other entity within their respective company(ies) which have the authority to authorize or deny entering into this Agreement.

24. This Agreement is intended by the Parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive statement of the terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, in connection therewith. This Agreement may be changed or modified only upon the written consent of the Parties hereto.

25. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
//
//
I.7.b
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 26 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on .
(to be filled in by Clerk of the Board)
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
By
JASON E. UHLEY
General Manager-Chief Engineer
By
KAREN SPIEGEL, Chair
Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District Board of Supervisors
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

MINH C. TRAN
County Counsel

KIMBERLY RECTOR
Clerk of the Board
By

RYAN YABKO
Deputy County Counsel
By
Deputy
(SEAL)
[Signed in Counterpart]
Cooperative Agreement:

Moreno Master Drainage Plan – Line F, Stage 4
Moreno – Line F Laterals
Project Nos. 4-0-00752 and 4-0-00738
Miscellaneous No. 210
AMR:blm
02/06/24
I.7.b
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 27 -
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By

MIKE LEE
City Manager
By

ULISES CABRERA
City Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: ATTEST:

By

STEVE QUINTANILLA
City Attorney
By

JANE HALSTEAD
City Clerk
(SEAL)
Cooperative Agreement:

Moreno Master Drainage Plan – Line F, Stage 4
Moreno – Line F Laterals
Project Nos. 4-0-00752 and 4-0-00738
Miscellaneous No. 210
AMR:blm
02/06/24
I.7.b
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 254754
- 28 -
HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW OPERATING CO.,
a Delaware general partnership
By

IDDO BENZEEVI
President
(ATTACH NOTARY WITH CAPACITY

STATEMENT)
Cooperative Agreement:

Moreno Master Drainage Plan – Line F, Stage 4
Moreno – Line F Laterals
Project Nos. 4-0-00752 and 4-0-00738
Miscellaneous No. 210
AMR:blm
02/06/24
I.7.b
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 EXHIBIT “A”

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL 1: APN: 478-220-005 AND APN: 478-220-010
LOTS 2 AND 7, IN BLOCK 60, OF BEAR VALLEY AND ALESSANDRO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AS SHOWN BY MAP NO. 1, IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 10 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

PARCEL 2: APN: 478-220-018 AND APN: 478-220-023
LOTS 2 AND 7, INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 81 OF BEAR VALLEY AND ALESSANDRO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AS SHOWN BY MAP NO. 1, IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 10, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

PARCEL 3: APN 478-230-003 AND APN 478-230-004
LOTS 2 AND 7 IN BLOCK 88 OF BEAR VALLEY AND ALESSANDRO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AS SHOWN BY MAP NO. 1, IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 10 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

PARCEL 4: APN 478-230-019 AND APN 478-230-020
LOTS 2 AND 7 IN BLOCK 109, MAP NO. 1 OF BEAR VALLEY AND ALESSANDRO DEVELOPMENT

COMPANY, IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 10 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY.

EXCEPT FROM SAID LOT 7, BLOCK 109, THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, IN DEED RECORDED JULY 24, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 97183 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

PARCEL 5: APN 488-350-005
LOT 7 IN BLOCK 55 OF MAP NO. 1, OF BEAR VALLEY AND ALESSANDRO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, IN

THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11, PAGE 10 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID

COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF EUCALYPTUS AVENUE, WITHIN SAID BLOCK LYING SOUTHERLY AND ADJACENT TO SAID LOT 7.

PARCEL 6: APN 488-350-056
ALL THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4 OF BLOCK 55, MAP NO. 1, BEAR VALLEY AND

ALESSANDRO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 11, PAGE 10 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1/2 OF ALL OIL, GAS, MINERAL AND SUBSURFACE RIGHTS 500 FEET OR

MORE BELOW THE SURFACE, BUT WITHOUT ANY RIGHTS WHATSOEVER TO THE USE OF THE SURFACE OR THE SUBSURFACE AREA OF SAID LAND TO A DEPTH OF 500 FEET FROM SAID SURFACE I.7.b
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169

EXHIBIT A
(Continued)

FOR ANY PURPOSE INCIDENTAL TO THE OWNERSHIP OF SAID SUBSTANCES, AS RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED JULY 12, 1961 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 59232, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

SAID EXCEPTING AFFECTS LOTS 1, 2 AND 4 OF SAID BLOCK 55.

EXCEPT THEREFROM ANY PORTION LYING WITHIN PARCEL MAP NO. 35629, IN BOOK 231, PAGES 77 THROUGH 82 OF PARCELS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.

ALSO EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY THAT CERTAIN DOCUMENT RECORDED JULY 15, 2021 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2021-0425360 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 I.7.b
Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements ׀ Page 1 of 4
DISTRICT's Insurance Requirements is as follows:

Without limiting or diminishing DEVELOPER's obligation to indemnify or hold DISTRICT harmless, DEVELOPER shall procure and maintain or cause to be maintained, at its sole cost and expense, the following insurance coverage’s during the term of this Agreement. As respects to the insurance section only, the DISTRICT herein refers to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the County of Riverside, its Agencies, Districts, Special Districts, and Departments, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, employees, elected or appointed officials, agents or representatives as Additional Insureds.

A. Workers' Compensation:

If DEVELOPER has employees as defined by the State of California, DEVELOPER shall maintain statutory Workers' Compensation Insurance (Coverage A) as prescribed by the laws of the State of California. Policy shall include Employers’ Liability (Coverage B) including Occupational Disease with limits not less than $1,000,000 per person per accident. Policy shall be endorsed to waive subrogation in favor of DISTRICT.

B. Commercial General Liability:

Commercial General Liability insurance coverage, including but not limited to, premises liability, unmodified contractual liability, products and completed operations liability, personal and advertising injury, and cross liability coverage, covering claims which may arise from or out of DEVELOPER's performance of its obligations hereunder. Policy shall name the DISTRICT as Additional Insured. Policy's limit of liability shall not be less than $2,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit.

C. Vehicle Liability:

If DEVELOPER's vehicles or mobile equipment are used in the performance of the obligations under this Agreement, then DEVELOPER shall maintain liability insurance for all owned, non-owned or hired vehicles so used in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. Policy shall name the DISTRICT as Additional Insureds.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements ׀ Page 2 of 4
D. Professional Liability:

DEVELOPER shall cause any architect or engineer retained by DEVELOPER in connection with the performance of DEVELOPER's obligations under this Agreement to maintain Professional Liability Insurance providing coverage for the performance of their work included within this Agreement, with a limit of liability of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate. DEVELOPER shall require that, if such Professional Liability Insurance is written on a claims made basis rather than an occurrence basis, such insurance shall continue through the term of this Agreement and that such architect or engineer shall purchase at such architect or engineer's sole expense either 1) an Extended Reporting Endorsement (also known as Tail Coverage); or 2) Prior Dates Coverage from a new insurer with a retroactive date back to the date of, or prior to, the inception of this Agreement; or 3) demonstrate through Certificates of Insurance that such architect or engineer has maintained continuous coverage with the same or original insurer. Coverage provided under items: 1), 2) or 3) shall continue for the term specified in the insurance policy as long as the law allows.

E. General Insurance Provisions – All Lines:
a. Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shall be admitted to the State of California and have an A.M. BEST rating of not less than an A: VIII (A: 8) unless such requirements are waived, in writing, by the DISTRICT Risk Manager. If the DISTRICTꞌs Risk Manager waives a requirement for a particular insurer such waiver is only valid for that specific insurer and only for one policy term.
b. The DEVELOPER must declare its insurance self-insured retention for each coverage required herein. If any such self-insured retention exceeds $500,000 per occurrence each such retention shall have the prior written consent of the DISTRICT Risk Manager before the commencement of operations under this Agreement. Upon notification of self-insured retention deemed unacceptable to the DISTRICT, and at the election of the DISTRICTꞌs Risk Manager, DEVELOPER's carriers shall either: 1) reduce or eliminate such self-insured retention with respect to this Agreement with DISTRICT, or 2) procure a bond which guarantees payment of losses and I.7.b
Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements ׀ Page 3 of 4
related investigations, claims administration, and defense costs and expenses.
c. DEVELOPER shall cause their insurance carrier(s) or its contractor's insurance carrier(s), to furnish DISTRICT with 1) a properly executed original certificate(s) of insurance and certified original copies of endorsements effecting coverage as required herein; and 2) if requested to do so orally or in writing by the DISTRICT Risk Manager, provide original certified copies of policies including all endorsements and all attachments thereto, showing such insurance is in full force and effect. Further, said certificate(s) and policies of insurance shall contain the covenant of the insurance carrier(s) that a minimum of thirty (30) days written notice shall be given to the DISTRICT prior to any material modification, cancellation, expiration or reduction in coverage of such insurance. If DEVELOPER insurance carrier(s) policies does not meet the minimum notice requirement found herein, DEVELOPER shall cause DEVELOPER's insurance carrier(s) to furnish a 30 day Notice of Cancellation Endorsement. d. In the event of a material modification, cancellation, expiration or reduction in coverage, this Agreement shall terminate forthwith, unless DISTRICT receives, prior to such effective date, another properly executed original certificate of insurance and original copies of endorsements or certified original policies, including all endorsements and attachments thereto, evidencing coverages set forth herein and the insurance required herein is in full force and effect. An individual authorized by the insurance carrier to do so on its behalf shall sign the original endorsements for each policy and the certificate of insurance.
e. It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto that DEVELOPER's insurance shall be construed as primary insurance, and DISTRICT's insurance and/or deductibles and/or self-insured retentions or self-insured programs shall not be construed as contributory.
f. If, during the term of this Agreement or any extension thereof, there is a material change in the scope of services or there is a material change in the equipment to be used in the performance of the scope of work which will add additional exposures (such as the use of aircraft, watercraft, cranes, I.7.b
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 Exhibit C
Insurance Requirements ׀ Page 4 of 4
etc.); or the term of this Agreement, including any extensions thereof, exceeds five (5) years, DISTRICT reserves the right to adjust the types of insurance required under this Agreement and the monetary limits of liability for the insurance coverages currently required herein, if, in the DISTRICT Risk Manager's reasonable judgment, the amount or type of insurance carried by DEVELOPER has become inadequate.
g. DEVELOPER shall pass down the insurance obligations contained herein to all tiers of subcontractors working under this Agreement. h. The insurance requirements contained in this Agreement may be met with a program(s) of self-insurance acceptable to DISTRICT.
i. DEVELOPER agrees to notify DISTRICT of any claim by a third party or any incident or event that may give rise to a claim arising from the performance of this Agreement.

I.7.b
Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 I.7.b
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Cooperative Agreement - Moreno MDP Line F, Stage 4 & Moreno - Line F Laterals - PEN22-0169 (PM 36457-1) (6566 : PEN22-0169 Report to City Council
ID#6567 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Melissa Walker, Public Works Director/City Engineer AGENDA DATE: April 2, 2024
TITLE: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations: That the City Council:

1. First Public Hearing:
a) Conduct the first Public Hearing for the proposed adoption of the Development Impact Nexus Fee Study Update (Dated April 2, 2024) (“2024 DIF Nexus Study”) which incorporates the adoption of the City of Moreno Valley’s 2024 Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023-24 and 2024-25;
b) After the Public Hearing, adopt Resolution No. 2024-XX adopting the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, and finding the action is exempt from CEQA;

2. Second Public Hearing:
a) Conduct the second Public Hearing for the proposed adjustment of the City’s Development Impact Fees; and
b) After the Public Hearing, adopt Resolution No. 2024-XX adjusting the City’s Development Impact Fees, and finding the action is exempt from CEQA.

SUMMARY
Staff recommends that the City Council conduct two separate Public Hearings at the same City Council meeting. The first Public Hearing is to consider the adoption of a Resolution adopting the City’s Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update (Dated April 2024) (“2024 DIF Nexus Study”) and the City’s 2024 Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023-24 and 2024-25 (“2024 Capital Improvement Plan”). The second Public Hearing is to consider the adoption of a second Resolution that approves the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule (“2024 DIF Schedule”), which adjusts the J.1
Packet Pg. 97

Development Impact Fees for residential, commercial, and industrial development based upon the findings set forth in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study.

BACKGROUND
Development Impact Fees
A Development Impact Fee (“DIF”) is a monetary exaction that is charged to an applicant in connection with the approval of a development project application(s). The purpose of Development Impact Fees is to defray all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to various development projects. “Public facilities” include public improvements, public services and community amenities. It should be noted that Development Impact Fees are not considered “taxes” or “special assessments.” Development Impact Fees also do not include fees for processing development entitlement applications or fees collected under statutory development agreements.

In summary, Development Impact Fees are fees imposed on specific development projects to defray the cost of new or additional public facilities that are needed to serve those developments. Common types of impact fees include traffic mitigation fees, public safety facilities fees, park facility fees, library facility fees, among others.

Required Ordinance and Resolution
The process for establishing Development Impact Fees typically involve the adoption of a Development Impact Fee Program (via an Ordinance) that sets forth the procedures for adopting, imposing, collecting and accounting for the City’s Development Impact Fees. In addition to an Ordinance, a Resolution is usually needed to set forth the actual amounts of each Development Impact Fee (i.e., DIF Schedule). In Moreno Valley, the requisite Ordinance(s) have been adopted which have been codified in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code as Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees). Throughout the years, the City has also adopted the requisite Resolution(s) that incorporate the City’s Development Impact Fee Schedule.

DIF Nexus Study Requirement
In 2021, Assembly Bill 602 (“AB 602”) amended the State law (“Mitigation Fee Act”) which governs Development Impact Fees. AB 602 emphasized the need to adopt a DIF Nexus Study at a Public Hearing prior to the adoption of any new or increased Development Impact Fees. Under AB 602, the City must provide a minimum of 30 days’ advanced notice of the DIF Nexus Study Public Hearing. AB 602 further provides that if the public submits information/evidence showing that the findings contained in the DIF Nexus Study are insufficient or that the City failed to comply with the law, the City must consider the information submitted. In summary, AB 602 requires the DIF Nexus Study to identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify new levels of service, explain why the new levels of service are more appropriate, and include information to support the required findings for adoption of Development Impact Fees.

J.1
Packet Pg. 98

The DIF Nexus Study basically provides a quantified basis for support of each Development Impact Fee. In other words, the Nexus Study is needed to provide the legal support for the required findings that must be made to justify the amount of each Development Impact Fee, based on existing deficiencies of certain public facilities and the projected burdens on those facilities caused by prospective development in the City.

Some of the baseline information needed for a Nexus Study includes: the City’s General Plan, Capital Improvement Plans, Specialized Master Plans (e.g., Park Master Plan, etc.) and Census Data. The DIF Nexus Study uses this baseline information to establish expectations of the City’s needs for certain public facilities based on anticipated land uses throughout the City and projected population trends. The DIF Nexus Study is also dependent on Land Use Database Information, an inventory of current development, expectations for future development, an inventory of the City’s existing assets, a determination of existing levels of service, etc. Essentially, the purpose of the DIF Nexus Study is to determine the expected increases in infrastructure demand from new development and to identify the types of public facilities needed to meet demand (increase capacity) and how to fairly distribute the monetary burden on a variety type of developments.

Finally, AB 602 requires that the DIF Nexus Studies be updated every 8 years.

Development Impact Fee Nexus Study Update
The City’s last DIF Nexus Study took place in 2022. Since that time, the City has approved a Capital Improvement Plans (CIP), a Park Master Plan, and has seen significant development activity in the recent years. The 2024 DIF Nexus Study accounts for these recent activities.

Staff has worked with Willdan Financial Services to finalize the 2024 DIF Nexus Study.

The 2024 DIF Nexus Study includes a section-by-section breakdown of the “public facility” categories subject to the payment of Development Impact Fees along with the necessary calculations to measure the demand that future development will have on the service levels of each public facility.

Pursuant to State law, the 2024 DIF Nexus Study contains the following: 1) it identifies the purpose of each DIF; 2) it identifies the use to which each DIF is to be put; 3) it identifies all public facilities that will be financed by the respective DIF with some public facilities referenced in the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan contained therein and other City documents; 4) it determines how there is a reasonable relationship between each DIF’s use and the type of development project on which the respective DIF is imposed; and 5) it determines how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the particular DIF is imposed. Incidentally, in any action imposing an impact fee as a condition of approval of a development project, the City must determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the impact fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the impact fee is imposed. These are fees that are most typically imposed on “ad hoc” basis, or “case-by-case” basis.

J.1
Packet Pg. 99

Moreover, while the City is authorized by law to immediately increase DIFs to capture one hundred percent of new developments’ share of public facility costs, staff instead recommends providing a gradual implementation of the 2024 DIF Schedule with automatic adjustments made to such fees every two years, ON January 1, 2020, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2030, as set forth in more detail in the Resolution. The automatic adjustments will account for the escalation in construction costs, based upon the figures published in the Engineering New Record’s Building Cost Index – 20 Cities Annual Average.

Additionally, staff recommends that the City continue the incentive reduction for Affordable Residential Single-Family, Affordable Residential Multi-Family and Affordable Residential Senior Mobile Home categories until such time as the City Council deems it appropriate to amend the City’s DIF Schedule via Resolution. Such reduction is reflected in the 2024 DIF Schedule recommended for adoption by staff. The continued availability of reduced DIF amounts will assist in the City with complying with the goals, policies and objectives of the City’s Housing Element as set forth in the City’s General Plan.

NOTE
The City’s consultant compared the City’s current DIFs with other jurisdictions across the region based upon type of development and finds that the City’s current DIFs are among the lowest in the region. The proposed adjustments described in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study would bring the City closer in line with other jurisdictions’ DIF Schedules.

Capital Improvement Plan
AB 602 also requires “large jurisdictions” (cities with populations over 250,000) to adopt a Capital Improvement Plan as part of their DIF Nexus Studies. While the City is not technically a “large jurisdiction” under AB 602, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed 2024 Capital Improvement Plan along with its approval of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study since the proposed 2024 Capital Improvement Plan does not include any changes to the 2022 Capital Improvement Plan previously approved by the City Council.
2024 DIF Schedule
Once again, the purpose of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study is to justify the amounts set forth in the proposed 2024 DIF Schedule, which incorporated the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan. Each DIF listed in the proposed 2024 DIF Schedule are supported by the findings set forth below, in the Resolution and the 2024 DIF Nexus Study. That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council identifies the purpose of each Development Impact Fee. In summary the findings in include the following:
a) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council identifies the use to which each Development Impact Fee is to be put;
J.1
Packet Pg. 100

b) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council identifies all public facilities that will be financed by the respective Development Impact Fee with some public facilities referenced in the Capital Improvement Plan contained therein and other City documents;
c) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council determines how there is a reasonable relationship between each Development Impact Fee’s use and the type of development project on which the respective Development Impact Fee will be imposed; and
d) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council determines how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for each public facility and the type of development project on which the particular Development Impact Fee will be imposed.
e) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council includes all the requisite information to support the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study as required under subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the California Government Code. f) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council supports all increases of existing Development Impact Fees and the assumptions contained in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supporting the original fees were properly reviewed and amount of the fees collected under the original fee were properly evaluated pursuant to subdivision (a)(4) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code.

With respect to residential development, the 2024 DIF Nexus Study calculates the amounts of DIFs for residential (housing) based on the square footage of the proposed number of units. As such, this is deemed to be a valid method of establishing a reasonable relationship between the DIF and the burden imposed by prospective housing development. Staff recommends that a temporary reduction for Affordable Residential Single-Family, Residential Multi-Family and Residential Senior Mobile Home categories will assist the City with complying with the policies, goals and objectives of the City’s Housing Element as set forth in the City’s General Plan.

The 2024 DIF Schedule includes a 2 percent administrative fee that reflects the City’s estimated costs to administer the establishment, imposition, collection, and analysis of the fees set forth in the 2024 DIF Fee Schedule.

Moreover, the total fee amounts set forth in the proposed 2024 DIF Schedule shall automatically increase, without further action by the City, on January 1, 2026, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2030, to account for the escalation in construction costs, based upon the figures published in the Engineering News Record's Building Cost Index—20 Cities Annual Average, as described in Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code.

Finally, for purposes of softening the impacts of any adjustments to the City’s current DIFs, staff recommends that the imposition of the DIFs Fees set forth in the 2024 DIF J.1
Packet Pg. 101

Schedule be phased in over a period of time commencing June 1, 2024, through January 1, 2030, subject the automatic Biennial Adjustments on January 1, 2026, January 1, 2028, and January 1. 2030.

Proposed Resolutions
There are two separate Resolutions staff is recommending that the City Council adopt:
1) a Resolution adopting the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan; and 2) a Resolution adopting the 2024 DIF Schedule, which includes adjustments to the 2022 DIF Schedule.

If the City Council approves the 2024 DIF Schedule, the adjusted DIFs will not go into effect until 60 days after the adoption of the respective Resolution which is June 1, 2024 – this is a State law requirement.

CEQA ANALYSIS
This action has been reviewed by staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines and determined that the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Schedule is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines for the following reasons:
1) The adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement and 2024 DIF Schedule is not a “project” as defined by 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15378(b)(4) since the collective purpose of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Schedule is to create a funding mechanism for certain public facilities which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment;
2) The adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Schedule is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(3) since it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Schedule may have a significant effect on the environment, since the collective purpose of 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Schedule is to create a funding mechanism for certain pubic facilities which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and 3) The adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Schedule is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15306 since none will result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource since the preparation of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan consisted of basic data collection regarding the funding of public facilities by future development and research to establish whether there is a reasonable relationship between the Development Impact Fee charged and the burden J.1
Packet Pg. 102

imposed by future development,

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the recommended actions as presented in this staff.

Staff recommends this alternative as it will allow for planning, design, and construction of necessary infrastructure improvements to mitigate the impact of development on the community.

2. Do not approve the recommended actions as presented in this staff report.

Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will delay or stop the planning, design, and construction of necessary infrastructure improvements to mitigate the impact of development on the community.

FISCAL IMPACT
The updated DIF Nexus Study supports a maximum future revenue stream of nearly $980 million through build-out of the City. Below are the maximum projected revenues for the DIF categories:

TYPE OF FACILITY PROJECTED REVENUE
Arterial Streets $250,933,188
Traffic Signals $46,987,376
Fire Facilities $42,962,800
Police Facilities $25,682,000
Parkland/Quimby $226,865,100
Recreation Centers $28,487,000
Libraries $22,831,000
City Hall $10,790,000
Corporate Yard $35,841,000
Maintenance Equipment $4,228,000
Interchange Improvements $282,425,409
Animal Shelter $2,541,000
Workforce Development Facilities $7,526,000

TOTAL MAXIMUM PROJECTED DIF

REVENUE
$980,574,073

NOTIFICATION
Requisite notices were published in the Press Enterprise on February 29, 2024, March 13, 2024 and March 19, 2024, for the Public Hearing to adopt the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Schedule. The City sent notification at least 14 days prior to all those who currently have any active request on file for any additional notifications pursuant to the Government Code. The City also made available to the public the 2024 DIF Nexus Study at least ten days before the Public Hearing, in accordance with Government Code Section 66016.

J.1
Packet Pg. 103

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Concurred By:

Melissa Walker, P.E. Brian Mohan
Public Works Director/City Engineer Assistant City Manager

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Public Facilities and Capital Projects. Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP

2. Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule

3. Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule

4. 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update

5. AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 7:57 AM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 3/26/24 9:04 AM
J.1
Packet Pg. 104
Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _________, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (FINAL) DATED
JANUARY 31, 2024, AND THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023-2024 AND 2024-2025 WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, a Development Impact Fee is a monetary exaction that is charged to a developer/applicant in connection with the approval of a development project; and WHEREAS, the purpose of Development Impact Fees is to defray all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to various development projects; and WHEREAS, “Public facilities” include public improvements, public services and community amenities; and
WHEREAS, Development Impact Fees are not considered “taxes” or “special assessments” and do not include fees for processing development entitlement applications or fees collected under development agreements; and WHEREAS, in summary, Development Impact Fees are fees imposed on specific development projects to defray the cost of new or additional public facilities that are needed to serve those developments; and
WHEREAS, the process for establishing Development Impact Fees typically involve the adoption of a Development Impact Fee Program (via an Ordinance) that sets forth the procedures for adopting, imposing, collecting and accounting of the City’s Development Impact Fees, which the City has adopted and codified in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code as Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Chapter

3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees); and
WHEREAS, Section 3.38.160 of Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Section 3.42.130 of Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) authorizes the City Council to periodically review and adjust to the applicable Development Impact Fees via a resolution, in accordance with the procedures and based upon the findings set forth in the Mitigation Fee Act, as set forth in California Government; and
WHEREAS, Section 3.38.160 of Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Section 3.42.130 of Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) further authorizes the City Council to provide annual adjustments to the applicable Development Impact Fee via a resolution to account for the escalation in construction costs, based upon the figures published in the Engineering News Record’s Building Cost Index—20 Cities Annual Average; and
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _________, 2024
WHEREAS, in addition to an ordinance, a resolution is usually needed to set forth the actual amounts of each Development Impact Fee (i.e., Development Impact fee Schedule), which the City has adopted on several occasions to memorialize the adoption of the City’s Development Impact Fee Schedules throughout the years; and WHEREAS, in 2021, Assembly Bill 602 (“AB 602”) amended the Mitigation Fee Act of the California Government Code which governs Development Impact Fees; and WHEREAS, AB 602 emphasized the need to adopt a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study at a public hearing prior to the adoption of any new or increased Development Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, AB 602 requires in part that the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify new levels of service, include an explanation of why the new levels of service are more appropriate, and include information to support the required findings for adoption of new or increased Development Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, the Development Impact Fee Nexus Study basically provides a quantified basis for support of each Development Impact Fee and the legal support for the required findings that must be made to justify the amount of each Development Impact Fee, based on existing deficiencies of certain public facilities and the projected burdens on those facilities caused by prospective development in the City; and WHEREAS, The City’s last Development Impact Fee Nexus Study took place in 2022, and since that time, the City has approved a Capital Improvement Plan, a Park Master Plan, and has seen significant development activity in the recent years; and WHEREAS, the City retained the professional services of Willdan Financial Services to prepare the City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update (Final) Dated January 31, 2024 (“2024 DIF Nexus Study”); and WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025 (“2024 Capital Improvement Plan”), which is part of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, indicates the approximate location, size, time of availability, and estimates of cost for all facilities or improvements to be financed with the City’s Development Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that the adoption of this Resolution adopting the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is exempt from CEQA pursuant as set forth in this Resolution below.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby resolve as follows:

Section 1. Recitals
That the Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated J.1.a
Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _________, 2024
herein by this reference, and adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.

Section 2. Exhibits
That the Exhibits attached to this Resolution, which include the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan as Exhibits A and B respectively, both of which are on file with the Moreno Valley City Clerk’s Office, the related Staff Report and all documents referenced therein are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 3. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all evidence submitted into the Administrative Record for the proposed adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, including, but not limited to, the following:
a) Moreno Valley General Plan and all relevant provisions contained therein; b) Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and all relevant provisions referenced therein;
c) Proposed 2024 DIF Nexus Study and City of Moreno Valley Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025, and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
d) Staff Report prepared for the City Council’s consideration and all documents, records, and references related thereto, and Staff’s presentation at the public hearing; and
e) Testimony, and/or comments from all persons provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Section 4. Findings
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Exhibits and all other evidence contained in the Administrative Record for this matter, the City Council finds as follows:
a) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies the purpose of each Development Impact Fee;
b) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies the use to which each Development Impact Fee is to be put;
c) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study identifies all public facilities that will be financed by the respective Development Impact Fee with some public facilities referenced in the Capital Improvement Plan contained therein and other City documents; J.1.a
Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _________, 2024
d) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study determines how there is a reasonable relationship between each Development Impact Fee’s use and the type of development project on which the respective Development Impact Fee will be imposed; and e) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study determines how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for each public facility and the type of development project on which the particular Development Impact Fee will be imposed. f) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study includes all the requisite information to support the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study as required under subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the California Government Code.
g) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supports all increases of existing Development Impact Fees and the assumptions contained in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supporting the original fees were properly reviewed and amount of the fees collected under the original fee were properly evaluated pursuant to subdivision (a)(4) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code.
h) That pursuant to subdivision (a)(5)(A) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code, since the 2024 DIF Nexus Study calculates the Development Impact Fees imposed on housing based on the square footage of the proposed number of units, it is deemed to be a valid method of establishing a reasonable relationship between the Development Impact Fee charged and the burden imposed by housing development. i) That the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan indicates the approximate location, size, time of availability, and estimates of cost for all facilities or improvements to be financed with the City’s Development Impact Fees. j) That proper notice of the April 2, 2024, Public Hearing was provided pursuant to Sections 66002 and 60016.5 of the California Government Code for the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Nexus Study, respectively. k) That the calculation of all Development Impact Fees contained in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study comply with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 66000) of the California Government Code, the California Constitution, and applicable case law.

Section 5. Adoption of 2024 DIF Nexus Study
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Exhibits, and Findings set forth hereinabove and all other evidence contained in the Administrative Record for this matter, the City Council hereby adopts pursuant to Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) Chapter 3.38 of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, and Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code in compliance with the California Constitution, and applicable case law, the City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update (Final) dated January 31, 2024 (“2024 DIF Nexus Study”), on file with the Moreno Valley City Clerk’s Office.

Section 6. Adoption of 2024 Capital Improvement Plan
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _________, 2024
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Exhibits, and Findings set forth hereinabove and all other evidence contained in the Administrative Record for this matter, including without limitation the 2024 DIF Nexus Study, the City Council hereby adopts the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, on file with the Moreno Valley City Clerk’s Office.

Section 7. CEQA Exemption
That the City Council hereby finds that the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines for the following reasons:
1) The adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is not a “project” as defined by 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15378(b)(4) since the purpose of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is to create a funding mechanism for certain public facilities which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment;
2) The adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(3) since it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan may have a significant effect on the environment, since the purpose of 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is to create a funding mechanism for certain pubic facilities which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and
3) The adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15306 since it does not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource since the preparation of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan consisted of basic data collection regarding the funding of public facilities by future development and research to establish whether there is a reasonable relationship between the Development Impact Fee charged and the burden imposed by future development.

Section 8. Severability
That should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution, the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution, 2024 DIF Nexus Study and/or the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 9. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict J.1.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _________, 2024
with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 10. Certification
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

APPROVED and ADOPTED this ___ day of ______, 2024.
___________________________________
Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Jane Halstead, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
Exhibits:

Exhibit A: Development Impact Fee Study Update (Final) - Dated January 31, 2024 Exhibit B: City Of Moreno Valley Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _________, 2024

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, , City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
____________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _______ __, 2024

EXHIBIT A

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (FINAL)
DATED JANUARY 31, 2024
(2024 DIF Nexus Study)
To be attached.

On File in Moreno Valley City Clerk’s Office
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: _______ __, 2024

EXHIBIT B

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023-2024 AND 2024-2025
(2024 Capital Improvement Plan)
To be attached.

On File in Moreno Valley City Clerk’s Office
J.1.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 DIF NEXUS Study CIP (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
2024 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE BASED ON THE

FINDINGS SET FORTH IN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (FINAL) DATED
JANUARY 31, 2024
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and WHEREAS, a Development Impact Fee is a monetary exaction that is charged to a developer/applicant in connection with the approval of a development project; and WHEREAS, the purpose of Development Impact Fees is to defray all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to various development projects; and WHEREAS, “Public facilities” include public improvements, public services and community amenities; and
WHEREAS, Development Impact Fees are not considered “taxes” or “special assessments” and do not include fees for processing development entitlement applications or fees collected under development agreements; and WHEREAS, in summary, Development Impact Fees are fees imposed on specific development projects to defray the cost of new or additional public facilities that are needed to serve those developments; and
WHEREAS, the process for establishing Development Impact Fees typically involve the adoption of a Development Impact Fee Program (via an Ordinance) that sets forth the procedures for adopting, imposing, collecting and accounting of the City’s Development Impact Fees, which the City has adopted and codified in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code as Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Chapter

3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees); and
WHEREAS, Section 3.38.160 of Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Section 3.42.130 of Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) authorizes the City Council to periodically review and adjust to the applicable Development Impact Fees via a resolution, in accordance with the procedures and based upon the findings set forth in the Mitigation Fee Act, as set forth in California Government; and
WHEREAS, Section 3.38.160 of Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Section 3.42.130 of Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) further authorizes the City Council to provide annual adjustments to the applicable Development Impact Fee via a resolution to account for the escalation in construction costs, based upon the figures published in the Engineering News Record’s Building Cost J.1.b
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
Index—20 Cities Annual Average; and
WHEREAS, in addition to an ordinance, a resolution is usually needed to set forth the actual amounts of each Development Impact Fee (i.e., Development Impact fee Schedule), which the City has adopted on several occasions to memorialize the adoption of the City’s Development Impact Fee Schedules throughout the years; and WHEREAS, in 2021, Assembly Bill 602 (“AB 602”) amended the Mitigation Fee Act of the California Government Code which governs Development Impact Fees; and WHEREAS, AB 602 emphasized the need to adopt a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study at a public hearing prior to the adoption of any new or increased Development Impact Fees; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted the City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update (Final) Dated January 31, 2024 and the City of Moreno Valley Capital Improvement Plan For Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025; and
WHEREAS, while the City is authorized by law to immediately increase fees to capture one hundred percent of new developments’ share of facility costs, staff instead recommends providing a gradual implementation schedule with automatic adjustment to such fees every two years, commencing April 2024, with the final adjustment commencing in January 2030, as set forth in more detail in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the automatic adjustments occur in 2026, 2028, and 2030 to account for the escalation in construction costs, based upon the figures published in the Engineering New Record’s Building Cost Index – 20 Cities Annual Average, but that in no event shall any adjustment exceed the costs associated with the City’s Development Impact Fee Program; and
WHEREAS, staff further recommends that a temporary reduction be put in place for Affordable Residential Single-Family, Residential Multi-Family and Residential Mobile/Senior categories until such time as the City Council deems it appropriate to amend the Resolution and applicable development impact fees further; and WHEREAS, a temporary reduction for Affordable Residential Single-Family, Residential Multi-Family and Residential Mobile/Senior categories will assist in the City’s Housing Element compliance; and
WHEREAS, staff has determined that the adoption of the City of Moreno Valley 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule based on the finding set forth in 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15061(b)(2), 15061(b)(3), and 15306 of the CEQA Guidelines.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley does hereby resolve as follows:

J.1.b
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
Section 1. Recitals
That the Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference, and adopted as findings in support of this Resolution.

Section 2. Exhibits
That the Exhibits attached to this Resolution, which include the City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 3. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all evidence submitted into the Administrative Record for the proposed adoption of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule, including, but not limited to, the following:
a) Moreno Valley General Plan and all relevant provisions contained therein; b) Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and all relevant provisions referenced therein;
c) 2024 DIF Nexus Study and City of Moreno Valley Capital Improvement Plan For Fiscal Years 2023-2024 and 2024-2025, and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
d) Staff Report prepared for the City Council’s consideration and all documents, records, and references related thereto, and Staff’s presentation at the public hearing; and
e) Testimony, and/or comments from all persons provided in written format or correspondence, at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Section 4. Findings
That based on the foregoing Recitals, Exhibits and all other evidence contained in the Administrative Record for this matter, the City Council finds as follows:
a) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council identifies the purpose of each Development Impact Fee;
b) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council identifies the use to which each Development Impact Fee is to be put;
c) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council identifies all public facilities that will be financed by the respective Development Impact Fee with some public facilities referenced in the Capital Improvement Plan contained therein and other City documents;
J.1.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
d) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council determines how there is a reasonable relationship between each Development Impact Fee’s use and the type of development project on which the respective Development Impact Fee will be imposed;
e) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council determines how there is a reasonable relationship between the need for each public facility and the type of development project on which the particular Development Impact Fee will be imposed;
f) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council includes all the requisite information to support the adoption of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study as required under subdivision (a) of Section 66001 of the California Government Code; g) That the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council supports all increases of existing Development Impact Fees and the assumptions contained in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study supporting the original fees were properly reviewed and the amount of the fees collected under the original fee were properly evaluated pursuant to subdivision (a)(4) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code; h) That pursuant to subdivision (a)(5)(A) of Section 66016.5 of the California Government Code, since the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council calculates the Development Impact Fees imposed on housing based on the square footage of the proposed number of units, it is deemed to be a valid method of establishing a reasonable relationship between the Development Impact Fee charged and the burden imposed by housing development;
i) That a temporary reduction for Affordable Residential Single-Family, Residential Multi-Family and Residential Senior Mobile Home categories will assist the City with complying with the policies, goals, and objectives of the City’s Housing Element as set forth in the City’s General Plan;
j) That the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan adopted by the City Council indicates the approximate location, size, time of availability, and estimates of cost for all facilities or improvements to be financed with the City’s Development Impact Fees; k) That proper notice of the April 2, 2024, Public Hearing was provided pursuant to Sections 66002 and 60016.5 of the California Government Code for the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan and 2024 DIF Nexus Study, respectively; l) That a 2 percent administrative fee reflects the City’s estimated costs to administer the establishment, imposition, collection, and analysis of the fees set forth in the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule; and
m) That the calculation of all Development Impact Fees contained in the 2024 DIF Nexus Study adopted by the City Council comply with Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 66000) of the California Government Code, the California Constitution, and J.1.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
applicable case law, as set forth in the findings set forth herein and described in Section 16 of the 2024 DIF Nexus Study.

Section 6. Definitions
That the words, terms and phrases of this Resolution shall have the same meanings and definitions ascribed to them in Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, unless otherwise set forth herein.

Section 7. Affordable Housing Reduction
That a temporary reduction for Affordable Residential Single-Family, Residential Multi-Family and Residential Senior Mobile Homes categories shall be provided until such time as the City Council deems it appropriate to adjust the applicable Development Impact Fees set forth in the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule.

Section 8. Application of Affordable Housing Reduction
That affordable housing projects shall comply with the required Area Median Income levels to ensure affordability and record the appropriate affordability covenants, as approved by the City.

Section 9. 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule
That in accordance with Section 3.38.160 of Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Section 3.42.130 of Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees), based on the 2024 DIF Nexus Study and 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, the City Council hereby adopts the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule which includes a 2% administrative fee, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 10. Automatic Biennial Adjustments
That the total fee amounts set forth in the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall automatically increase, without further action by the City, on January 1, 2026, January 1, 2028, and January 1, 2030, to account for the escalation in construction costs, based upon the figures published in the Engineering News Record's Building Cost Index—20 Cities Annual Average, as described in Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code.

Section 11. Phased Schedule
That the imposition of the Development Impact Fees set forth in the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule shall be phased in as follows, commencing June 1, 2024 through January 1, 2030, subject the automatic Biennial Adjustments on January 1, 2026, January 1, 2028, and January 1. 2030.

J.1.b
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024

EFFECTIVE DATE
June 1, 2024

DEVELOPMENT TYPE AMOUNT PER
Residential
Subdivisions
Single-Family
Market Rate $15,269.50 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $7,634.75 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $10,025.50 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $5,012.75 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $6,178.75 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $3,089.37 Dwelling Unit
Residential
Infill
Single-Family
Market Rate $15,046.00 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $7,523.00 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $9,883.25 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $4,941.62 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $6,071.75 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $3,035.87 Dwelling Unit
Commercial General Commercial $14,339.00 1,000 Square Foot Regional Commercial $14,516.00 1,000 Square Foot
High Cube Commercial $1,227.00 1,000 Square Foot
Office Office $7,340.25 1,000 Square Foot
Industrial General Industrial $3,760.50 1,000 Square Foot J.1.b
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024

EFFECTIVE DATE
JANUARY 1, 2026*

DEVELOPMENT TYPE AMOUNT PER
Residential
Subdivisions
Single-Family
Market Rate $20,002.00 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $10,001.00 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $13,321.00 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $6,660.50 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $8,144.50 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $4,072.25 Dwelling Unit
Residential
Infill
Single-Family
Market Rate $19,555.00 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $9,777.50 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $13,036.50 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $6,518.25 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $7,930.50 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $3,965.25 Dwelling Unit
Commercial General Commercial $24,205.00 1,000 Square Foot Regional Commercial $25,001.25 1,000 Square Foot
High Cube Commercial $1,652.25 1,000 Square Foot
Office Office $10,874.50 1,000 Square Foot
Industrial General Industrial $5,164.00 1,000 Square Foot * The total fee amounts set forth in the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall automatically increase, without further action by the City, on January 1, 2026, to reflect any changes in costs for those capital improvements described in the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, using the City Council approved figures published in the Engineering News Record’s Building Cost Index –20 Cities Annual Average, but in no event shall such fees exceed the costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.b
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024

EFFECTIVE DATE
JANUARY 1, 2028**

DEVELOPMENT TYPE AMOUNT PER
Residential
Subdivisions
Single-Family
Market Rate $24,734.50 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $12,367.12 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $16,616.50 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $8,308.22 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $10,122.25 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $5,061.10 Dwelling Unit
Residential
Infill
Single-Family
Market Rate $24,064.00 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $12,031.96 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $16,189.75 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $8,094.85 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $9,801.25 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $4,900.60 Dwelling Unit
Commercial General Commercial $32,651.00 1,000 Square Foot Regional Commercial $34,222.00 1,000 Square Foot
High Cube Commercial $2,133.00 1,000 Square Foot
Office Office $14,450.75 1,000 Square Foot
Industrial General Industrial $6,585.50 1,000 Square Foot ** The total fee amounts set forth in the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall automatically increase, without further action by the City, on January 1, 2028, to reflect any changes in costs for those capital improvements described in the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, using the City Council approved figures published in the Engineering News Record’s Building Cost Index –20 Cities Annual Average, but in no event shall such fees exceed the costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.b
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024

EFFECTIVE DATE
JANUARY 1, 2030***

DEVELOPMENT TYPE DIF FEES PER
Residential
Subdivisions
Single-Family
Market Rate $29,466.00 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $14,733.00 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $19,912.00 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $9,956.00 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $12,094.00 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $6,047.00 Dwelling Unit
Residential
Infill
Single-Family
Market Rate $28,572.00 Dwelling Unit
Single-Family
Affordable $14,286.00 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Market Rate $19,343.00 Dwelling Unit
Multi-Family
Affordable $9,671.50 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Market Rate $11,666.00 Dwelling Unit
Senior Mobile Home Park
Affordable $5,833.00 Dwelling Unit
Commercial General Commercial $41,808.00 1,000 Square Foot Regional Commercial $44,076.00 1,000 Square Foot
High Cube Commercial $2,586.00 1,000 Square Foot
Office Office $18,0007.00 1,000 Square Foot
Industrial General Industrial $7,998.00 1,000 Square Foot *** The total fee amounts set forth in the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall automatically increase, without further action by the City, on January 1, 2030, to reflect any changes in costs for those capital improvements described in the 2024 Capital Improvement Plan, using the City Council approved figures published in the Engineering News Record’s Building Cost Index –20 Cities Annual Average, but in no event shall such fees exceed the costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.b
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
Section 12. DIF PAYMENT
That payment of required Development Impact Fees shall be paid at the times set forth in Chapter 3.38 (Residential Development Impact Fees) and Chapter 3.42 (Commercial and Industrial Impact Fees) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code.

Section 13. CEQA Exemption
That the City Council hereby finds that the adoption of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule is exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines for the following reasons:
1) The adoption of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule s not a “project” as defined by 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15378(b)(4) since the purpose of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule is to create a funding mechanism for certain public facilities which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment;
2) The adoption of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15061(3) since it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule may have a significant effect on the environment, since the purpose of 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule is to create a funding mechanism for certain pubic facilities which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment; and
3) The adoption of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule is exempt from CEQA pursuant to 14 California Code of Regulations Section 15306 since it does not result in a serious or major disturbance to an environmental resource since the preparation of the 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule consisted of basic data collection regarding the funding of public facilities by future development and research to establish whether there is a reasonable relationship between the Development Impact Fee charged and the burden imposed by future development.

Section 14. Effective Date
That pursuant to Section 66017 of the Government Code, the development impact fees herein shall not take effect until sixty (60) following adoption of this Resolution.

Section 15. Severability
That should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence or word of this Resolution or Nexus Study be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences or words of this Resolution and/or Nexus Study as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

J.1.b
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
Section 16. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all the provisions heretofore adopted by the City Council that are in conflict with the provisions of this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 17. Certification
That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

APPROVED and ADOPTED this ___ day of ______, 2024.
___________________________________
Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Jane Halstead, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
Exhibits
Exhibit A: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule
J.1.b
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, , City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
____________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
J.1.b
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 2024-XX
Date Adopted: ______ __, 2024
EXHIBIT “A”
2024 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
[SEE ATTACHED]
J.1.b
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-____ - DIF Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
2024

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE
Adopted
April 2, 2024
Resolution 2024-___
********
Effective Date
June 1, 2024
J.1.c
Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT DRAFT
–3-27-24
Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Update - Phase in Schedule Fee Category Residential
Residential
(Affordable)
Regional
Commercial
General
Commercial Office Industrial
High Cube
Warehouse
Current Fee Schedule
Police $ 0.43 $ 0.22 $ 0.21 $ 0.21 $ 0.28 $ 0.10 $ 0.06 Fire 0.62 0.31 0.50 0.50 0.55 0.27 0.17
Libraries 0.27 0.13 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01
Rec Centers 0.36 0.18 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.00
Arterial Streets 3.01 1.51 11.65 12.59 5.58 2.72 0.75
Traffic Signals 0.40 0.20 1.34 1.26 0.74 0.34 0.10
Interchange 1.37 0.69 9.01 8.94 2.87 1.39 0.39
City Hall 0.21 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.06 0.01
Animal Shelter 0.04 0.02 - - - - -
Corporate Yard 0.39 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.21 0.08 0.05
Maintenance Equipment 0.11 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.02 0.02 Parks - Land 0.29 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.02
Parks - Improvements 2.27 1.14 0.27 0.27 0.35 0.13 0.08 Workforce Development 0.13 0.07 0.23 0.23 0.30 0.11 0.07 Total - per Square Foot $ 9.90 $ 4.95 $ 23.62 $ 24.41 $ 11.17 $ 5.27 $ 1.73 Phase in 2024
Police $ 0.53 $ 0.26 $ 0.24 $ 0.24 $ 0.31 $ 0.12 $ 0.07 Fire 0.80 0.40 0.66 0.66 0.78 0.34 0.21
Libraries 0.39 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.01
Recreation Centers 0.47 0.24 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.02
Arterial Streets 3.44 1.72 14.00 14.23 6.39 3.05 0.85
Traffic Signals 0.52 0.26 1.99 1.84 0.97 0.45 0.13
Interchange Improvements 2.21 1.10 15.48 15.42 4.70 2.19 0.62 City Hall 0.24 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.06 0.02
Animal Shelter 0.05 0.02 - - - - -
Corporate Yard 0.58 0.29 0.24 0.24 0.30 0.11 0.07
Maintenance Equipment 0.12 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.02 0.02 Parks - Land 0.78 0.39 0.14 0.14 0.18 0.07 0.04
Parks - Improvements 3.02 1.51 0.44 0.44 0.57 0.21 0.13 Workforce Development 0.15 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.34 0.13 0.08 Total - per Square Foot $ 13.30 $ 6.65 $ 33.68 $ 33.71 $ 14.86 $ 6.79 $ 2.28 Phase in 2026
Police $ 0.63 $ 0.31 $ 0.26 $ 0.26 $ 0.34 $ 0.13 $ 0.08 Fire 0.98 0.49 0.81 0.81 1.01 0.41 0.25
Libraries 0.51 0.26 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.03 0.02
Recreation Centers 0.59 0.30 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.04 0.03
Arterial Streets 3.87 1.93 16.35 15.88 7.21 3.38 0.96
Traffic Signals 0.64 0.32 2.64 2.43 1.20 0.55 0.16
Interchange Improvements 3.05 1.52 21.94 21.91 6.54 2.99 0.85 City Hall 0.27 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.06 0.03
Animal Shelter 0.06 0.03 - - - - -
Corporate Yard 0.76 0.38 0.30 0.30 0.39 0.15 0.09
Maintenance Equipment 0.12 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.02 Parks - Land 1.28 0.64 0.23 0.23 0.30 0.11 0.07
Parks - Improvements 3.77 1.88 0.61 0.61 0.79 0.29 0.19 Workforce Development 0.17 0.09 0.30 0.30 0.39 0.14 0.09 Total - per Square Foot $ 16.69 $ 8.35 $ 43.74 $ 43.02 $ 18.55 $ 8.31 $ 2.82 Phase in 2028
Police $ 0.72 $ 0.36 $ 0.29 $ 0.29 $ 0.37 $ 0.14 $ 0.08 Fire 1.16 0.58 0.97 0.97 1.23 0.48 0.30
Libraries 0.64 0.32 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.04 0.02
Recreation Centers 0.71 0.36 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.05 0.04
Arterial Streets 4.29 2.15 18.70 17.52 8.02 3.72 1.06
Traffic Signals 0.76 0.38 3.30 3.01 1.43 0.66 0.19
Interchange Improvements 3.88 1.94 28.41 28.39 8.38 3.79 1.09 City Hall 0.29 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.06 0.03
Animal Shelter 0.08 0.04 - - - - -
Corporate Yard 0.95 0.48 0.37 0.37 0.47 0.18 0.11
Maintenance Equipment 0.13 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.02 Parks - Land 1.77 0.88 0.32 0.32 0.41 0.16 0.09
Parks - Improvements 4.51 2.26 0.78 0.78 1.02 0.38 0.24 Workforce Development 0.19 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.43 0.16 0.10 Total - per Square Foot $ 20.09 $ 10.04 $ 53.81 $ 52.32 $ 22.23 $ 9.82 $ 3.37 Maximum Justified - 2030
Police $ 0.82 $ 0.41 $ 0.31 $ 0.31 $ 0.40 $ 0.15 $ 0.09 Fire 1.34 0.67 1.12 1.12 1.46 0.55 0.34
Libraries 0.76 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.05 0.03
Recreation Centers 0.83 0.42 0.15 0.15 0.20 0.07 0.05
Arterial Streets 4.72 2.36 21.05 19.16 8.83 4.05 1.16
Traffic Signals 0.88 0.44 3.95 3.59 1.66 0.76 0.22
Interchange Improvements 4.72 2.36 34.88 34.88 10.22 4.59 1.32 City Hall 0.32 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.06 0.04
Animal Shelter 0.09 0.05 - - - - -
Corporate Yard 1.14 0.57 0.43 0.43 0.56 0.21 0.13
Maintenance Equipment 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.02 0.02 Parks - Land 2.26 1.13 0.41 0.41 0.53 0.20 0.12
Parks - Improvements 5.26 2.63 0.95 0.95 1.24 0.46 0.29 Workforce Development 0.21 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.47 0.17 0.11 Total - per Square Foot $ 23.48 $ 11.74 $ 63.87 $ 61.62 $ 25.92 $ 11.34 $ 3.92 J.1.c
Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT DRAFT
–3-27-24
Equivalent Fees per Residential Square Foot
Fee per Single
Family Unit
(Current)
Assumed
Residents or
Trips per Single
Family Unit
(2022 Study)
Fee per
Resident or
per Trip
Residents or
Trips per
Average DU
(2024 Study)
Equivalent
Fee per
Average
DU (2024)
Square
Feet per
Average
DU
Equivalent
Fee per
Square Foot
Equivalent
Affordable
Fee per
Square Foot
Police $ 909.50 4.17 $ 218.11 3.41 $ 743.74 1,729 $ 0.43 $ 0.22 Fire 1,313.50 4.17 314.99 3.41 1,074.11 1,729 0.62 0.31 Libraries 568.50 4.17 136.33 3.41 464.89 1,729 0.27 0.13 Rec Centers 753.00 4.17 180.58 3.41 615.76 1,729 0.36 0.18 Arterial Streets 5,673.50 10.47 541.88 9.61 5,207.48 1,729 3.01 1.51 Traffic Signals 748.00 10.47 71.44 9.61 686.56 1,729 0.40 0.20 Interchange 2,583.50 9.43 273.97 8.66 2,372.55 1,729 1.37 0.69 City Hall 450.00 4.17 107.91 3.41 367.99 1,729 0.21 0.11 Animal Shelter 77.00 4.17 18.47 3.41 62.97 1,729 0.04 0.02 Corporate Yard 819.50 4.17 196.52 3.41 670.14 1,729 0.39 0.19 Maintenance Equipment 239.50 4.17 57.43 3.41 195.85 1,729 0.11 0.06 Parkland - Infill 618.50 4.17 148.32 3.41 505.78 1,729 0.29 0.15 Park Improvements - Infill 4,801.00 4.17 1,151.32 3.41 3,926.00 1,729 2.27 1.14 TOTAL - INFILL $ 19,555.00 $16,893.81 $ 9.77 $ 4.89
J.1.c
Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Exhibit A to Resolution No. 2024-_____ - 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule [Revision 1] (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE STUDY
UPDATE
FINAL
JANUARY 31, 2024
Oakland Office Corporate Office Other Regional Offices
66 Franklin Street 27368 Via Industria Aurora, CO
Suite 300 Suite 200 Orlando, FL
Oakland, CA 94607 Temecula, CA 92590 Phoenix, AZ
Tel: (510) 832-0899 Tel: (800) 755-6864 Plano, TX
Fax: (888) 326-6864 Seattle, WA
Washington, DC
www.willdan.com
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND This page intentionally left blank.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................... 5 Background and Study Objectives 5
Facility Standards and Costs 5
Use of Fee Revenues 6
Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary 6
Other Funding Needed 8

1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 9 Public Facilities Financing in California 9
Study Objectives 9
Fee Program Maintenance 10
Study Methodology 10
Types of Facility Standards 11
New Development Facility Needs and Costs 11
Organization of the Report 12

2. GROWTH FORECASTS ............................................................... 14 Land Use Types 14
Existing and Future Development 14
Occupant Densities 15

3. ARTERIAL STREETS................................................................... 17 Trip Demand 17
Trip Growth 19
Project Costs 19
Fee per Trip Demand Unit 20
Fee Schedule 20

4. TRAFFIC SIGNALS ..................................................................... 22 Project Costs and Cost Allocation 22
Fee per Trip Demand Unit 22
Fee Schedule 23

5. FIRE FACILITIES........................................................................ 24 Service Population 24
Facility Inventories and Standards 24
Existing Inventory 24
Planned Facilities 25
Cost Allocation 26
Existing Level of Service 26
Future Level of Service 27
Use of Fee Revenue 27
Non-Fee Funding Required 28
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update ii
Fee Schedule 28

6. POLICE FACILITIES.................................................................... 30 Service Population 30
Facility Inventories and Standards 30
Existing Inventory 30
Planned Facilities 31
Cost Allocation 31
Existing Level of Service 31
Future Level of Service 32
Use of Fee Revenue 32
Non-Fee Funding Required 33
Fee Schedule 33

7. PARK FACILITIES....................................................................... 35 Service Population 35
Existing Parkland and Park Facilities Inventory 35
Parkland and Park Facilities Unit Costs 41
Parkland and Park Facility Standards 41
Mitigation Fee Act 41
Quimby Act 42
City of Moreno Valley Parkland and Park Facilities Standards 42 Facilities Needed to Accommodate New Development 42
Existing Deficiencies 43
Parks Cost per Capita 44
Use of Fee Revenue 45
Fee Schedule 45

8. RECREATION FACILITIES............................................................ 47 Service Population 47
Existing Recreation and Community Center Facilities Inventory 47 Planned Recreation and Community Center Facilities 48
Cost Allocation 49
Existing Level of Service 49
Future Level of Service 49
Use of Fee Revenue 50
Fee Revenue Projection 50
Fee Schedule 51

9. LIBRARY FACILITIES .................................................................. 52 Service Population 52
Existing Library Facilities 52
Planned Facilities 53
Cost Allocation 53
Existing Level of Service 53
Future Level of Service 54
Use of Fee Revenue 54
Fee Revenue Projection 55
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update iii
Fee Schedule 55

10. CITY HALL FACILITIES................................................................ 57 Service Population 57
Facility Inventories and Standards 57
Existing Inventory 57
Cost Allocation 58
Fee Revenue Projection 59
Fee Schedule 59

11. CORPORATION YARD FACILITIES ................................................ 61 Service Population 61
Facility Inventories and Standards 61
Existing Inventory 61
Planned Facilities 62
Cost Allocation 62
Existing Level of Service 62
Future Level of Service 63
Use of Fee Revenue 64
Non-Fee Funding Required 64
Fee Schedule 64

12. MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT FACILITIES ........................................ 66 Service Population 66
Facility Inventories and Standards 66
Existing Inventory 66
Cost Allocation 67
Fee Revenue Projection 67
Fee Schedule 68

13. FREEWAY INTERCHANGES ......................................................... 69 Trip Demand 69
Trip Demand Growth 69
Project Costs 70
Fee per Trip Demand Unit 70
Fee Schedule 71

14. ANIMAL SHELTER FACILITIES...................................................... 73 Service Population 73
Facility Inventories and Standards 73
Existing Inventory 73
Planned Facilities 74
Cost Allocation 74
Existing Level of Service 74
Future Level of Service 75
Use of Fee Revenue 75
Non-fee Funding Required 75
Fee Schedule 76
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update iv

15. WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES ..................................... 77 Service Population 77
Facility Inventories and Standards 77
Existing Inventory 77
Planned Facilities 78
Cost Allocation 78
Existing Level of Service 78
Future Level of Service 78
Use of Fee Revenue 79
Non-Fee Funding Required 79
Fee Schedule 80

16. AB 602 REQUIREMENTS............................................................ 82 Compliance with AB 602 82
66016.5. (a) (2) - Level of Service 82
66016.5. (a) (4) – Review of Original Fee Assumptions 82 66016.5. (a) (6) – Capital Improvement Plan 83

17. IMPLEMENTATION...................................................................... 84 Impact Fee Program Adoption Process 84
Inflation Adjustment 84
Reporting Requirements 84
Programming Revenues and Projects with the CIP 84
Reimbursements 85

18. MITIGATION FEE ACT FINDINGS.................................................. 86 Purpose of Fee 86
Use of Fee Revenues 86
Benefit Relationship 86
Burden Relationship 87
Proportionality 87
APPENDIX ........................................................................................... 1 J.1.d
Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 5 Executive Summary
This report summarizes an analysis of development impact fees needed to support future development in The City of Moreno Valley through 2045. It is the City’s intent that the costs representing future development’s share of public facilities and capital improvements be imposed on that development in the form of a development impact fee, also known as a public facilities fee. The public facilities and improvements included in this analysis are divided into the fee categories listed below:
▪ Arterial Streets;  Library Facilities;
▪ Traffic Signals;  City Hall Facilities;
▪ Fire Facilities;  Corporation Yard Facilities;
▪ Police Facilities;  Maintenance Equipment Facilities; ▪ Parks;  Freeway Interchanges; and,
▪ Recreation Facilities;  Animal Shelter Facilities.
▪ Workforce Development Facilities;
Background and Study Objectives
The primary policy objective of a development impact fee program is to ensure that new development pays the capital costs associated with growth. The primary purpose of this report is to calculate and present fees that will enable the City to expand its inventory of public facilities, as new development creates increases in service demands.

The City imposes public facilities fees under authority granted by the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act), contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. This report provides the necessary findings required by the Act for adoption of the fees presented in the fee schedules contained herein.

All development impact fee-funded capital projects should be programmed through the City’s fiveyear Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Using a CIP can help the City identify and direct its fee revenue to public facilities projects that will accommodate future growth. By programming fee revenues to specific capital projects, the City can help ensure a reasonable relationship between new development and the use of fee revenues as required by the Mitigation Fee Act.

Facility Standards and Costs
There are three approaches typically used to calculate facilities standards and allocate the costs of planned facilities to accommodate growth in compliance with the Mitigation Fee Act requirements.

The system plan approach is based on a master facility plan in situations where the needed facilities serve both existing and new development. This approach allocates existing and planned facilities across existing and new development to determine new development’s fair share of facility needs. This approach is used when it is not possible to differentiate the benefits of new facilities between new and existing development. Often the system plan is based on increasing facility standards, so the City must find non-impact fee revenue sources to fund existing development’s fair share of planned facilities. This approach is used for the fire, police, parks, recreation center, library, corporation yard, animal shelter and workforce development facility fees in this report.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 6 The planned facilities approach allocates costs based on the ratio of planned facilities that serve new development to the increase in demand associated with new development. This approach is appropriate when specific planned facilities that only benefit new development can be identified, or when the specific share of facilities benefiting new development can be identified. Examples include street improvements to avoid deficient levels of service or a sewer trunk line extension to a previously undeveloped area. This approach is used for the arterial street, traffic signal, and freeway interchange facility fees.

The existing inventory approach is based on a facility standard derived from the City’s existing level of facilities and existing demand for services. This approach results in no facility deficiencies attributable to existing development. This approach is often used when a long-range plan for new facilities is not available. Only the initial facilities to be funded with fees are identified in the fee study. Future facilities to serve growth will be identified through the City’s annual capital improvement plan and budget process and/or completion of a new facility master plan. This approach is to calculate the city hall and maintenance equipment facilities fees in this report.

Use of Fee Revenues
The Mitigation Fee Act requires that this analysis “Identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in Section 65403 or 66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged.” 1 Each
chapter in this report identifies the appropriate use of impact fee revenues for each particular impact fee category.

Impact fee revenue must be spent on new facilities or expansion of current facilities to serve new development. Facilities can be generally defined as capital acquisition items with a useful life greater than five years. Impact fee revenue can be spent on capital facilities to serve new development, including but not limited to land acquisition, construction of buildings, infrastructure, the acquisition of vehicles or equipment, information technology, software licenses and equipment.

Development Impact Fee Schedule Summary
Table E.1 summarizes the development impact fees that meet the City’s identified needs and comply with the requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act. 1 California Government Code §66001 (a) (2).

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Va
lley Development Impact Fee Study Update7
Table E.1: Development Impact Facilities Fee Summary
Land Use
Arterial
Streets
Traffic
Signals Fire Police
Park
Fee1
Recreation
Centers Libraries City Hall
Corporate
Yard
Maintenance
Equipment
Interchange
Improvements
Animal
Shelter
Workforce
Development Total
Residential Fee per Sq. Ft. $ 4.72 $ 0.88 $ 1.34 $ 0.82 $ 7.51 $ 0.83 $ 0.76 $ 0.32 $ 1.14 $ 0.13 $ 4.72 $ 0.09 $ 0.21 $23.47 Nonresidential Fee per Sq. Ft.

Regional Commercial $ 21.05 $ 3.95 $ 1.12 $ 0.31 $ 1.36 $ 0.15 $ 0.09 $ 0.12 $ 0.43 $ 0.05 $ 34.88 $ - $ 0.36 $63.87 General Commercial 19.16 3.59 1.12 0.31 1.36 0.15 0.09 0.12 0.43 0.05 34.88 - 0.36 61.26 Office 8.83 1.66 1.46 0.40 1.77 0.20 0.12 0.16 0.56 0.07 10.22 - 0.47 25.45 Industrial 4.05 0.76 0.55 0.15 0.66 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.21 0.02 4.59 - 0.17 11.17 High Cube Warehouse 1.16 0.22 0.34 0.09 0.41 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.13 0.02 1.32 - 0.11 3.81 Sources: Tables 3.5, 4.3, 5.6, 6.6, 7.10, 8.6, 9.6, 10.5, 11.6, 12.5, 13.5, 14.6 and 15.6. 1 A development project either pays the park fee or the Quimby fee, not both. Development not occurring in subdivisions is subject to the park fee. Development in subdivisions is subject to the Quimby fee. Fee amounts are the same under the Mitigation Fee Act and Quimby Act.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 8 Other Funding Needed
Impact fees may only fund the share of public facilities related to new development in Moreno Valley. They may not be used to fund the share of facility needs generated by existing development or by development outside of the City. As shown in Table E.2, approximately $1.2 billion in additional funding will be needed to complete the facility projects the City currently plans to develop. The “Additional Funding Required” column shows non-impact fee funding required to fund a share of the improvements partially funded by impact fees. Non-fee funding is needed because these facilities are needed partially to remedy existing deficiencies and partly to accommodate new development.

The City will need to develop alternative funding sources to fund existing development’s share of the planned facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

Table E.2: Non-Impact Fee Funding Required
Fee Category
Net Project
Cost
Projected
Impact Fee
Revenue
Additional
Funding Required
Arterial Streets1$ 538,326,986 $ 250,933,188 $ 287,393,798 Traffic Signals1 57,954,000 46,987,376 10,966,624
Fire Facilities 159,888,602 42,962,800 116,925,802
Police Facilities2 102,540,256 25,682,000 82,314,930
Parks/Quimby 591,362,565 227,853,300 363,509,265
Recreation Centers 87,403,482 25,254,000 62,149,482
Libraries 92,041,585 22,831,200 69,210,385
City Hall3 9,970,000 9,970,000 -
Corporate Yard 152,574,841 35,841,000 116,733,841
Maintenance Equipment3 4,228,000 4,228,000 -
Interchange Improvements1 403,549,409 282,425,409 121,124,000 Animal Shelter 7,466,303 2,541,000 4,925,303
Workforce Development Facilities 34,992,542 7,526,000 27,466,542 Total $ 2,207,306,029 $ 977,509,273 $ 1,235,253,430
2 Additional funding required also necessary to cover negative fund balance.

Sources: Tables 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, 4.2, 5.3, 5.5, 6.5, 7.7, 7.8, 8.5, 9.5, 10.4, 11.5, 12.4, 13.3, 13.4, 14.5 and 15.5. 3 These categories w ere calculated using the existing standard methodology. Under this methodology the fee revenue is equal to new development's share of project costs. 1 TUMF funding and/or existing fund balances w ill fund some of the alternative funding requirements.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 9 1. Introduction
This report presents an analysis of the need for public facilities to accommodate new development in the City of Moreno Valley. This chapter provides background for the study and explains the study approach under the following sections:
• Public Facilities Financing in California;
• Study Objectives;
• Fee Program Maintenance;
• Study Methodology; and,
• Organization of the Report.

Public Facilities Financing in California
The changing fiscal landscape in California during the past 45 years has steadily undercut the financial capacity of local governments to fund infrastructure. Three dominant trends stand out:
• The passage of a string of tax limitation measures, starting with Proposition 13 in 1978 and continuing through the passage of Proposition 218 in 1996; • Declining popular support for bond measures to finance infrastructure for the next generation of residents and businesses;
• Unfunded state and federal mandates; and,
• Steep reductions in federal and state assistance.

Faced with these trends, many cities and counties have had to adopt a policy of “growth pays its own way.” This policy shifts the burden of funding infrastructure expansion from existing ratepayers and taxpayers onto new development. This funding shift has been accomplished primarily through the imposition of assessments, special taxes, and development impact fees also known as public facilities fees. Assessments and special taxes require the approval of property owners and are appropriate when the funded facilities are directly related to the developing property. Development impact fees, on the other hand, are an appropriate funding source for facilities that benefit all development jurisdiction-wide. Development impact fees need only a majority vote of the legislative body for adoption.

Study Objectives
The primary policy objective of a public facilities fee program is to ensure that new development pays the capital costs associated with growth. Policy 2.14.1 of the City’s General Plan states “Conduct periodic review of public facilities impact mitigation fees in accordance with state statutes to ensure that the charges are consistent with the costs of improvements.” The primary purpose of this report is to update the City’s impact fees based on the most current available facility plans and growth projections. The proposed fees will enable the City to expand its inventory of public facilities as new development leads to increases in service demands. This report supports the General Plan policy stated above.

The City imposes public facilities fees under authority granted by the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act), contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 et seq. This report provides the necessary findings required by the Act for adoption of the fees presented in the fee schedules presented in this report.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 10 Moreno Valley is forecast to significant growth through this study’s planning horizon of 2045. This growth will create an increase in demand for public services and the facilities required to deliver them. Given the revenue challenges described above, Moreno Valley has decided to use a development impact fee program to ensure that new development funds the share of facility costs associated with growth. This report makes use of the most current available growth forecasts and the City’s most recently adopted Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to update the City’s existing fee program to ensure that the fee program accurately represents the facility needs resulting from new development.

Fee Program Maintenance
Once a fee program has been adopted it must be properly maintained to ensure that the revenue collected adequately funds the facilities needed by new development. To avoid collecting inadequate revenue, the inventories of existing facilities and costs for planned facilities must be updated periodically for inflation, and the fees recalculated to reflect the higher costs. The use of established indices for each facility included in the inventories (land, buildings, and equipment), such as the Engineering News-Record, is necessary to accurately adjust the impact fees. For a list of recommended indices, see Chapter 17.

While fee updates using inflation indices are appropriate for annual or periodic updates to ensure that fee revenues keep up with increases in the costs of public facilities, it is recommended to conduct more extensive updates of the fee documentation and calculation (such as this study) when significant new data on growth forecasts and/or facility plans become available. For further detail on fee program implementation, see Chapter 17.

Study Methodology
Development impact fees are calculated to fund the cost of facilities required to accommodate growth. The six steps followed in this development impact fee study include:

1. Estimate existing development and future growth: Identify a base year for existing development and a growth forecast that reflects increased demand for public facilities;

2. Identify facility standards: Determine the facility standards used to plan for new and expanded facilities;

3. Determine facilities required to serve new development: Estimate the total amount of planned facilities, and identify the share required to accommodate new development;

4. Determine the cost of facilities required to serve new development: Estimate the total amount and the share of the cost of planned facilities required to accommodate new development;

5. Calculate fee schedule: Allocate facilities costs per unit of new development to calculate the development impact fee schedule; and

6. Identify alternative funding requirements: Determine if any non-fee funding is required to complete projects.

The key public policy issue in development impact fee studies is the identification of facility standards (step #2, above). Facility standards document a reasonable relationship between new development and the need for new facilities. Standards ensure that new development does not fund deficiencies associated with existing development.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 11 Types of Facility Standards
There are three separate components of facility standards:
 Demand standards determine the amount of facilities required to accommodate growth, for example, park acres per thousand residents, square feet of library space per capita, or gallons of water per day. Demand standards may also reflect a level of service such as the vehicle volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio used in traffic planning.  Design standards determine how a facility should be designed to meet expected demand, for example, park improvement requirements and technology infrastructure for City office space. Design standards are typically not explicitly evaluated as part of an impact fee analysis but can have a significant impact on the cost of facilities. Our approach incorporates the cost of planned facilities built to satisfy the City’s facility design standards.
 Cost standards are an alternate method for determining the amount of facilities required to accommodate growth based on facility costs per unit of demand. Cost standards are useful when demand standards were not explicitly developed for the facility planning process. Cost standards also enable different types of facilities to be analyzed based on a single measure (cost or value) and are useful when different facilities are funded by a single fee program. Examples include facility costs per capita, cost per vehicle trip, or cost per gallon of water per day.

New Development Facility Needs and Costs
A number of approaches are used to identify facility needs and costs to serve new development.

This is often a two-step process: (1) identify total facility needs, and (2) allocate to new development its fair share of those needs.

There are three common methods for determining new development’s fair share of planned facilities costs: the system plan method, the planned facilities method, and the existing inventory method. The formula used by each approach and the advantages and disadvantages of each method is summarized below:

System Plan Method
This method calculates the fee based on the value of existing facilities plus the cost of planned facilities, divided by demand from existing plus new development:

Value of Existing Facilities + Cost of Planned Facilities Existing + New Development Demand
This method is useful when planned facilities need to be analyzed as part of a system that benefits both existing and new development. It is difficult, for example, to allocate a new fire station solely to new development when that station will operate as part of an integrated system of fire stations that together achieve the desired level of service.

The system plan method ensures that new development does not pay for existing deficiencies.

Often facility standards based on policies such as those found in General Plans are higher than the existing facility standards. This method enables the calculation of the existing deficiency required to bring existing development up to the policy-based standard. The local agency must secure non-fee funding for that portion of planned facilities required to correct the deficiency to ensure that new development receives the level of service funded by the impact fee. This approach is used for the fire, police, parks, recreation center, library, corporation yard, animal shelter and workforce development facility fees in this report. = $/unit of demand
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 12 Existing Inventory Method
The existing inventory method allocates costs based on the ratio of existing facilities to demand from existing development as follows:

Current Value of Existing Facilities
Existing Development Demand
Under this method new development will fund the expansion of facilities at the same standard currently serving existing development. By definition the existing inventory method results in no facility deficiencies attributable to existing development. This method is often used when a longrange plan for new facilities is not available. Only the initial facilities to be funded with fees are identified in the fee study. Future facilities to serve growth are identified through an annual capital improvement plan and budget process, possibly after completion of a new facility master plan.

This approach is to calculate the city hall and maintenance equipment facilities fees in this report.

Planned Facilities Method
The planned facilities method allocates costs based on the ratio of planned facility costs to demand from new development as follows:

Cost of Planned Facilities
New Development Demand
This method is appropriate when planned facilities will entirely serve new development, or when a fair share allocation of planned facilities to new development can be estimated. An example of the former is a Wastewater trunk line extension to a previously undeveloped area. An example of the latter is a portion of a roadway that has been identified as necessary to mitigate the impact from new development through traffic modeling analysis. Under this method new development will fund the expansion of facilities at the standards used in the applicable planning documents. This approach is used for the arterial street, traffic signal, and freeway interchange facility fees.

Organization of the Report
The determination of a public facilities fee begins with the selection of a planning horizon and development of growth projections for population and employment. These projections are used throughout the analysis of different facility categories and are summarized in Chapter 2.

Chapters 3 through 15 identify facility standards and planned facilities, allocate the cost of planned facilities between new development and other development, and identify the appropriate development impact fee for each of the following facility categories:
▪ Arterial Streets;  Library Facilities;
▪ Traffic Signals;  City Hall Facilities;
▪ Fire Facilities;  Corporation Yard Facilities;
▪ Police Facilities;  Maintenance Equipment Facilities; ▪ Parks;  Freeway Interchanges; and,
▪ Recreation Facilities;  Animal Shelter Facilities.
▪ Workforce Development Facilities;
Chapter 16 describes how this study complies with the requirements of AB 602. = $/unit of demand
= $/unit of demand
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 13 Chapter 17 details the procedures that the City must follow when implementing a development impact fee program. Impact fee program adoption procedures are found in California Government Code Sections 66016 through 66018.

The five statutory findings required for adoption of the proposed public facilities fees in accordance with the Mitigation Fee Act are documented in Chapter 17.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 14 2. Growth Forecasts
Growth projections are used as indicators of demand to determine facility needs and allocate those needs between existing and new development. This chapter explains the source for the growth projections used in this study based on a 2023 base year and a planning horizon of 2045.

Estimates of existing development and projections of future growth are critical assumptions used throughout this report. These estimates are used as follows:
• The estimate of existing development in 2023 is used as an indicator of existing facility demand and to determine existing facility standards. • The estimate of total development at the 2045 planning horizon is used as an indicator of future demand to determine total facilities needed to accommodate growth and remedy existing facility deficiencies, if any. • Estimates of growth from 2023 through 2045 are used to (1) allocate facility costs between new development and existing development, and (2) estimate total fee revenues.

The demand for public facilities is based on the service population, dwelling units or nonresidential development creating the need for the facilities.

Land Use Types
To ensure a reasonable relationship between each fee and the type of development paying the fee, growth projections distinguish between different land use types. The land use types that impact fees have been calculated for are defined below. • Residential: All residential dwelling units. Fees charged per square foot of living space.
• Commercial: All commercial, retail, educational, and hotel/motel development. • Office: All general, professional, and medical office development. • Industrial: All manufacturing and other industrial development. • Warehousing: All warehouse development
Some developments may include more than one land use type, such as a mixed-use development with both residential and commercial uses. Another similar situation would be a warehousing facility that contains office space. In those cases, the facilities fee would be calculated separately for each land use type included within the building.

The City has the discretion to determine which land use type best reflects a development project’s characteristics for purposes of imposing an impact fee and may adjust fees for special or unique uses to reflect the impact characteristics of the use.

Existing and Future Development
Table 2.1 shows the estimated number of residents, dwelling units, employees, and building square feet in Moreno Valley, both in 2023 and in 2045. The base year estimates of residents and dwelling units comes from the California Department of Finance. Future resident and dwelling unit are based on estimates from SCAG's Connect SoCal Growth Forecast.

Base year employees were estimated based on data obtained from the U.S. Census Bureau’s OnTheMap Application. Total future employees were also estimated based on SCAG Integrated J.1.d
Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 15 Growth Forecast, allocated to the nonresidential land use categories based on current proportions.

Table 2.1: Demographic Assumptions
2023 2045 Increase
Residents1
207,700 266,800 59,100
Dwelling Units2
Single Family 48,200 62,400 14,200
Multifamily 10,200 15,900 5,700
Total 58,400 78,300 19,900
Employment3
Commercial 16,400 20,500 4,100
Office 12,500 15,600 3,100
Industrial 2,000 2,500 500
Warehousing 21,100 26,300 5,200
Total 52,000 64,900 12,900
Building Square Feet (000s)4
Commercial 6,862 8,577 1,715
Office 4,006 5,000 994
Industrial 1,724 2,155 431
Warehousing 29,306 69,906 40,600
Total 41,898 85,638 43,740
Note: Figures have been rounded to the hundreds.
1 Current population from California Department of Finance (DOF). Projection for 2045 based on 2045 SCAG Connect SoCal Grow th Forecast.
2 Current values from DOF. Projection of 78,300 housing units for 2045 SCAG Connect SoCal Grow th Forecast. Assumes 2.3% vacancy and a total of 76,200 households.
3 Existing estimates based on data from OnTheMap. Excludes local government employees. Future employees from SCAG Connect SoCal allocated to land use categories based on current proportions.
4 Estimated based on employment and employment density factors in Table 2.2, except for w arehousing. Increase in w arehousing is based on an increase of 40.6 million building square feet identified in existing development agreements.

Sources: California Department of Finance (DOF), Table E-5, 2023; Draft Grow th Figures from SCAG's Connect SoCal Demographics and Grow th Forecast; U.S.

Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (2021); City of Moreno Valley; World Logistics Center Specific Plan (2015); Willdan Financial Services.

Occupant Densities
All fees in this report are calculated based on dwelling units or building square feet. Occupant density assumptions ensure a reasonable relationship between the size of a development project, the increase in service population associated with the project, and the amount of the fee.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 16 Occupant densities (residents per dwelling unit or workers per building square foot) are the most appropriate characteristics to use for most impact fees. The fee imposed should be based on the land use type that most closely represents the probable occupant density of the development.

The average occupant density factor used in this report is shown in Table 2.2. The residential density factor is based on data for Moreno Valley from Connect SoCal Growth Forecast by dividing the total projected dwelling units in 2045 by the total projected population at that time.

The nonresidential occupancy factors are based on occupancy factors found in the Employment Density Study Summary Report, prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments by The Natelson Company. Though not specific to Moreno Valley, the Natelson study covered employment density over a wide array of land use and development types, making it reasonable to apply these factors to other areas. The specific factors used in this report are for developing suburban areas, as defined by the Natelson study.

Table 2.2: Occupant Density
Residential 3.41 Residents per Dwelling Unit
Nonresidential
Commercial 2.39 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Office 3.12 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Industrial 1.16 Employees per 1,000 square feet
High Cube Warehouse 0.72 Employees per 1,000 square feet Sources: SCAG SoCal Connect Grow th Forecast; The Natelson Company, Inc., Employment Density Study Summary Report, prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments, October 31, 2001, SCAG region data; Willdan Financial Services.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 17 3. Arterial Streets
This chapter summarizes an analysis of the need for arterial streets, including roadway segments and intersection improvements, to accommodate new development. The chapter documents a reasonable relationship between new development and the impact fee for funding of these facilities.

Trip Demand
The need for street improvements is based on the trip demand placed on the system by development. A reasonable measure of demand is the number of average daily vehicle trips, adjusted for the type of trip. Vehicle trip generation rates are a reasonable measure of demand on the City’s system of street improvements across all modes because alternate modes (transit, bicycle, pedestrian) often substitute for vehicle trips.

The two types of trips adjustments made to trip generation rates to calculate trip demand are described below:
• Pass-by trips are deducted from the trip generation rate. Pass-by trips are intermediates stops between an origin and a final destination that require no diversion from the route, such as stopping to get gas on the way to work. • The trip generation rate is adjusted by the average length of trips for a specific land use category compared to the average length of all trips on the street system.

Table 3.1 shows the calculation of trip demand factors by land use category based on the adjustments described above. Data is based on extensive and detailed trip surveys conducted in the San Diego region by the San Diego Association of Governments. The surveys provide one of the most comprehensive databases available of trip generation rates, pass-by trips factors, and average trip length for a wide range of land uses. Though urban development patterns differ between San Diego and the City of Moreno Valley, the use of this data is appropriate as a means of allocating trips across multiple land use categories. It should be noted that the projections of current and future trip generation in this report are based on data specific to the City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
18 Table 3.1: Trip Rate Adjustment Factors
Primary
Trips1
Diverted
Trips1
Adjustment
Factor for
Non-Passby Trips1
Average
Trip
Length2
Adjustment
Factor3ITE Category
Average
Daily
Trips4
Trip
Demand
Factor5 A B C = A + B D E = C x D F G = E x F
Residential
Single Family 86% 11% 97% 1.14 1.11 Single Family Housing (210) 9.43 10.47 Multifamily 86% 11% 97% 1.14 1.11 Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) 6.74 7.48 Nonresidential
Regional Commercial 54% 35% 89% 0.75 0.67 Shopping Center (820) 37.01 24.80 General Commercial 45% 40% 85% 0.72 0.61 Shopping Center (820) 37.01 22.58 Office 77% 19% 96% 1.00 0.96 General Office Building (710) 10.84 10.41 Industrial 79% 19% 98% 1.00 0.98 General Light Industrial (110) 4.87 4.77 High Cube Warehouse 92% 5% 97% 1.00 0.97 High-Cube / Short-Term Storage Warehouse (154) 1.40 1.36 2 From Table 5, "Derivation of Trip-Length Adjustments for Arterial Development Impact Fee." Distance to Jurisdictional Limit. 3 The trip adjustment factor equals the percent of non-pass-by trips multiplied by the average trip length. 4 Trips per dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet.. 5
The trip demand factor is the product of the trip adjustment factor and the average daily trips.

Sources: San Diego Association of Governments, Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002; Institute of Traffic Engineers, Trip Generation, 11th Edition; City of Moreno Valley, "Derivation of Trip-Length Adjustments for Arterial Development Impact Fee;" Willdan Financial Services. 1 Percent of total trips. Primary trips are trips w ith no midw ay stops, or "links". Diverted trips are linked trips w hose distance adds at least one mile to the primary trip. Pass-by trips are links that do not add more than one mile to the total trip.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 19 Trip Growth
The planning horizon for this analysis is 2045. Table 3.2 lists the 2023 and 2045 land use assumptions used in this study. The trip demand factors calculated in Table 3.1 are multiplied by the existing and future dwelling units and building square feet to determine the increase in trips caused by new development.

Table 3.2: Land Use Scenario and Total Trips
Land Use
Trip
Demand
Factor
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Residential
Single Family 10.47 48,200 504,654 14,200 148,674 62,400 653,328 Multifamily 7.48 10,200 76,296 5,700 42,636 15,900 118,932 Subtotal 58,400 580,950 19,900 191,310 78,300 772,260
Nonresidential
Commercial 24.8 6,862 170,176 1,715 42,544 8,577 212,720 Office 10.41 4,006 41,707 994 10,343 5,000 52,050
Industrial 4.77 1,724 8,224 431 2,056 2,155 10,280
Warehousing 1.36 29,306 39,856 40,600 55,216 69,906 95,072 Subtotal 41,898 259,963 43,740 110,159 85,638 370,122
Total 840,913 301,469 1,142,382

73.6% 26.4% 100.0%
Sources: Tables 2.1 and 3.1; Willdan Financial Services 2023 Growth 2023 to 2045 2045
Project Costs
Cost estimates are summarized in Table 3.3, and displayed in detail in Appendix Table A.1.

None of the projects included in the fee program were deficient at the time the fee program was created. As such, the full cost of the improvements is needed to remedy unacceptable level of service decreases caused by the increase in trips from new development. The City’s traffic engineers prepared the cost estimates, using cost estimating methodology consistent with the estimating methodology used in recent WRCOG’s Nexus Study. TUMF credits are identified in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study (2016 Update).

The City may decide to alter the scope of the planned projects or to substitute new projects if those new projects continue to represent an expansion of the City’s facilities. If the total cost of facilities varies from the total cost used as a basis for the fees, the City should consider revising the fees accordingly.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 20 Table 3.3: Planned Facilities
No. Roadway Total Cost
1 Total DIF Cost for East-West Arterial Streets $ 212,631,190 2 Total DIF Cost for North-South Arterial Streets 274,262,146 3 Non-Master Planned Storm Drain Projects in CIP 2,161,000 4 Freeway Overpasses (non-interchange) 20,330,000
5 Nason-Dracaea (Letterman) Booster Bump Station 2,000,000 6 Citywide Bridges 26,431,000
7 Share of Debt Service Costs - See Appendix Table A.21 511,649
Subtotal $ 538,326,986
Less TUMF Credit for Backbone Arterial Streets $ 82,985,000 Less TUMF Credit for Secondary Arterial Streets 197,273,000 Less Existing Fund Balance 7,135,798
Total DIF Project Cost - 2023 $ 250,933,188
1 New development's share of debt costs is equal to the present value of the interest multiplied by new development's share of total trips identified in Table 3.2 (31.3% x $1,938,066).

Sources: "Summary Of DIF Cost For Arterial Streets," 2023, City of Moreno Valley; Appendix Tables A.1 and A.2, Willdan Financial Services.

Fee per Trip Demand Unit
Every impact fee consists of a dollar amount, or the cost of projects that can be funded by a fee, divided by a measure of development. In this case, all fees are first calculated as a cost per trip demand unit. Then these amounts are translated into housing unit (cost per dwelling unit) and employment space (cost per 1,000 building square feet) by multiplying the cost per trip by the trip generation rate for each land use category. These amounts become the fee schedule.

Table 3.4 calculates the cost the cost per trip demand unit by dividing the total project costs attributable to new development summarized in Table 3.3, by the total growth in trips calculated in Table 3.2.

Table 3.4: Cost per Trip to Accommodate Growth
Fee Program Share of Planned Facilities Costs $ 250,933,188 Growth in Daily Trips 301,469
Cost per Trip $ 832
Sources: Tables 3.2 and 3.3; Willdan Financial Services.

Fee Schedule
Table 3.5 shows the maximum justified arterial streets fee schedule. The maximum justified fees are based on the costs per trip shown in Table 3.4. The cost per trip is multiplied by the trip demand factors in Table 3.1 to determine a fee per unit of new development. The fee per average J.1.d
Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 21 sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 3.5: Arterial Streets Impact Fee
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Trip
Land Use
Cost Per
Trip
Demand
Factor Base Fee1
Admin
Charge1, 2 Total Fee1
Fee per
Sq. Ft.3
Residential Dwelling Unit 4
$ 832 9.61 $ 7,996 $ 160 $ 8,156 $ 4.72
Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Regional Commercial $ 832 24.80 $ 20,634 $ 413 $ 21,047 $ 21.05 General Commercial 832 22.58 18,787 376 19,163 19.16
Office 832 10.41 8,661 173 8,834 8.83
Industrial 832 4.77 3,969 79 4,048 4.05
High Cube Warehouse 832 1.36 1,132 23 1,155 1.16
4 Average trip demand factor per residential dw elling unit w eighted by projected single family and multifamily development.

Sources: Tablse 3.1 and 3.4; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 22 4. Traffic Signals
This chapter summarizes an analysis of the need for traffic signals to accommodate new development. The chapter documents a reasonable relationship between new development and the impact fee for funding of these facilities. Note that the trip demand factors calculated in Table

3.1, and the trip growth projections calculated in Table 3.2 will also be used in this chapter.

Project Costs and Cost Allocation
Cost estimates for traffic signals and related facilities needed to serve new development are summarized in Table 4.1. A list of signal controller locations and new signals are shown in Appendix Tables A.3 and A.4. The City will require 96 new signals to serve new development.

The City will also require upgrades to 39 existing signal controllers to accommodate the increase in trip demand. The cost for new signals is allocated completely to new development. However, the controller upgrades and communications ducts are needed as a result of existing demand and future demand. As such, a share of the cost of controller upgrades and communication ducts is allocated to new development proportional to new development’s share of total trips at the planning horizon.

Table 4.1: Traffic Signal Costs
Component Amount Units Unit Cost Total Cost
Allocation to
New
Development1
Cost Allocated
to New
Development
Traffic signals 96 Signals $480,000 $46,080,000 100.0% $ 46,080,000 Future communication duct2 87 Miles 132,000 11,484,000 26.4% 3,031,776 Traffic signal controller upgrades 39 Signal Controllers 10,000 390,000 26.4% 102,960 Total DIF Project Cost $57,954,000 $ 49,214,736
Less Existing Fund Balance 2,227,360
Net DIF Cost $ 46,987,376
1 For controller upgrades and communication ducts, new development's fair share is equal to its share of trips at buildout, as show n in Table 4.2. 2 $25 per lane foot.

Source: City of Moreno Valley, 2023; Table 3.2, Willdan Financial Services.

Fee per Trip Demand Unit
Every impact fee consists of a dollar amount, or the cost of projects that can be funded by a fee, divided by a measure of development. In this case, all fees are first calculated as a cost per trip demand unit. Then these amounts are translated into housing unit (cost per dwelling unit) and employment space (cost per 1,000 building square feet) by multiplying the cost per trip by the trip generation rate for each land use category. These amounts become the fee schedule.

Table 4.2 calculates the cost the cost per trip demand unit by dividing the total project costs attributable to new development summarized in Table 4.1, by the total growth in trips calculated in Table 3.2.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 23 Table 4.2: Cost per Trip to Accommodate Growth
Fee Program Share of Planned Facilities Costs $ 46,987,376 Growth in Daily Trips 301,469
Cost per Trip $ 156
Sources: Tables 3.2 and 4.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Fee Schedule
Table 4.3 shows the maximum justified traffic signals facilities fee schedule. The maximum justified fees are based on the costs per trip shown in Table 4.2. The cost per trip is multiplied by the trip demand factors in Table 3.1 to determine a fee per unit of new development. The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 4.3: Traffic Signals Impact Fee
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Trip
Land Use
Cost Per
Trip
Demand
Factor Base Fee1
Admin
Charge1, 2 Total Fee1
Fee per Sq.

Ft.

Residential Dwelling Unit 4$ 156 9.61 $ 1,499 $ 30 $ 1,529 $ 0.88 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Regional Commercial $ 156 24.80 $ 3,869 $ 77 $ 3,946 $ 3.95 General Commercial 156 22.58 3,522 70 3,592 3.59
Office 156 10.41 1,624 32 1,656 1.66
Industrial 156 4.77 744 15 759 0.76
High Cube Warehouse 156 1.36 212 4 216 0.22
4 Average trip demand factor per residential dw elling unit w eighted by projected single family and multifamily development.

Sources: Tablse 3.1 and 4.2; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 24 5. Fire Facilities
The purpose of the fire impact fee is to fund the fire facilities needed to serve new development.

A maximum justified fee schedule is presented based on the system plan standard of fire facilities per capita.

Service Population
Fire facilities are used to provide services to both residents and businesses. The service population used to determine the demand for fire facilities includes both residents and workers.

Table 5.1 shows the current fire facilities service population and the estimated service population at the planning horizon of 2045.

To calculate service population for fire protection facilities, residents are weighted at 1.00. A worker is weighted at 0.69 of one resident to reflect the lower per capita need for fire services associated with businesses.

The specific 0.69 per worker weighting used here is derived from an extensive study carried out by planning staff in the City of Phoenix. Data from that study is used to calculate a per capita factor that is independent of land use patterns. It is reasonable to assume that relative demand for fire service between residents and workers does not vary substantially on a per capita basis across communities, enabling the use of this data in other communities in the documentation of a fire facilities impact fee.

Table 5.1: Fire Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers1
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 243,600
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 68,000
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 311,600
Weighting factor 1.00 0.69
Source: Tables 2.1; City of Phoenix, AZ.
1 Service population w eighting factors based on study of City of Phoenix service call data w eighted by the relative proportions of residential and nonresidential land use in the City, allow ing the results of this survey to be applied in other areas.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s fire facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
Table 5.2 summarizes the City’s current inventory of land, apparatus and vehicles. Fire protection services are provided from seven stations located throughout the City. The unit cost for the land value assumption of $374,000 per acre was based on an analysis of recent sales comparisons, and consistent with other chapters in this report. Building valuations were provided by the City. A J.1.d
Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 25 summary of the value of vehicles, fire protection equipment, and apparatuses can be found in Appendix Table A.5.

Table 5.2: Existing Fire Facilities Land and Building Inventory Address Inventory Units Unit Cost Value
Land (acres)
Fire Station #2 24935 Hemlock Avenue 1.60 acres $ 374,000 $ 598,400 Fire Station #6 22250 Eucalyptus Avenue 1.20 acres 374,000 448,800 Fire Station #48 10511 Village Road 0.90 acres 374,000 336,600 Fire Station #58 28040 Eucalyptus Avenue 3.30 acres 374,000 1,234,200 Fire Station #65 15111 Indian Street 0.72 acres 374,000 269,300 Fire Station #91 16110 Lasselle Street 3.08 acres 374,000 1,151,900 Fire Station #99 13700 Morrison Street 1.50 acres 374,000 561,000 Emergency Ops Cen 22870 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos 1.05 acres 374,000 392,700 Subtotal 13.35 $ 4,992,900
Buildings (square feet) 1
Fire Station #2 24935 Hemlock Avenue 8,848 Sq. Ft. $ 525 $ 4,645,200 Fire Station #6 22250 Eucalyptus Avenue 9,490 Sq. Ft. 525 4,982,250 Fire Station #48 10511 Village Road 5,604 Sq. Ft. 525 2,942,100 Fire Station #58 28040 Eucalyptus Avenue 10,340 Sq. Ft. 525 5,428,500 Fire Station #65 15111 Indian Street 5,022 Sq. Ft. 525 2,636,550 Fire Station #91 16110 Lasselle Street 8,848 Sq. Ft. 525 4,645,200 Fire Station #99 13700 Morrison Street 10,348 Sq. Ft. 525 5,432,700 Emergency Ops Cen 22870 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos 8,492 Sq. Ft. 525 4,458,300 Subtotal 66,992 Sq. Ft. $30,712,500
Vehicles and Apparatus (See Appendix Tables A.5) $ 2,302,700 Total Value of Existing Facilities $42,466,400
Sources: City of Moreno Valley; Appendix Table A.5, Willdan Financial Services.

Planned Facilities
Table 5.3 summarizes the planned facilities needed to serve the City through 2045, as identified by City’s Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25 Capital Improvement Plan. The City plans to build several new fire stations and purchase several engines and apparatus, in addition to upgrading facilities to add capacity at several locations. Additionally, a share of the debt service costs for fire facilities is also allocated to new development. The value of the future payments is discounted into 2023 dollars. See Appendix Table A.2 for additional detail. New facilities costs are estimated to total approximately $165.2 million through 2045.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 26 Table 5.3: Planned Fire Facilities
Description Cost
Fire Station 65 Relocation $ 10,137,000
Remodel Fire Station 65 11,250,000
Fire Station 58 Expansion and Improvements * 5,250,000
Fire Station (Future) Land Acquisition 1,065,000
Industrial Fire Station 14,398,000
Infill Fire Station 9,733,000
Northeast Fire Station 11,000,000
Photovoltaic System for Fire Station 2, Fire Station 6, and Fire Station 58 584,000 Public Safety Building Conversion - Phase I1 39,281,500 Public Safety Building Expansion - Phase II & III1 43,337,500 Southeast Moreno Valley Public Safety Joint Use Station1 18,750,000 Debt Service Costs2
441,400
Total Cost - Planned Facilities $165,227,400
1 Half of these projects are included in the fire facilities fee and half are included in the police facilities fee. 2 See Appendix Table A.2.

Sources: City of Moreno Valley, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25; Appendix Table A.2.

Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” Table 5.4 expresses the City’s current fire facilities level of service in terms of an existing cost per capita.

This cost per capita is not used in the fee calculation, rather it is shown here for informational purposes only.

Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the cost per capita shown in Table 5.4. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City has an adequate fire response time throughout the City.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 27 Table 5.4: Existing Level of Service
Value of Existing Facilities $ 42,466,400
Existing Fund Balance 5,338,798
Total $ 47,805,198
Existing Service Population 243,600
Cost per Capita $ 196
Facility Standard per Resident $ 196
Facility Standard per Worker1
135
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.69.

Sources: Tables 5.1 and 5.2.

Future Level of Service
Table 5.5 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in fire protection facilities at the planning horizon. This level of service drives the fee calculation. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the planning horizon.

The value per capita is multiplied by the worker weighting factor of 0.69 to determine the value per worker.

Table 5.5: Fire Protection Facilities System Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 42,466,400
Value of Planned Facilities 165,227,400
Total System Value (2045) $ 207,693,800
Future Service Population (2045) 311,600
Cost per Capita $ 667
Facility Standard per Resident $ 667
Facility Standard per Worker1 460
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.69.

Sources: Tables 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3.

Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use fire facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, vehicles, apparatus and fire protection equipment that are part of the system of fire facilities serving new development. A list of planned facilities is included in Table 5.3.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 28 Non-Fee Funding Required
Completing the planned facilities will provide a higher value of facilities per capita than is currently provided in Moreno Valley. Impact fee revenue may not be used to increase the level of service provided to existing development. Therefore, impact fee revenue will not fully fund the planned fire protection facilities and some non-fee funding will be required. Table 5.6 shows the projected fee revenue and the non-fee funding required through 2045. After accounting for the projected future impact fee revenue, approximately $116.9 million in non-fee funding will be needed to complete the planned fire protection facilities. The City will need to use alternative funding sources to fund existing development’s share of the planned fire protection facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

Table 5.6: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita $ 667
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045)1
64,412
Fee Revenue $ 42,962,800
Cost of Planned Facilities $ 165,227,400
Less Fee Revenue 42,962,800
Less Existing Fund Balance 5,338,798
Non-Fee Revenue to be Identified $ 116,925,802
Sources: Tables 5.1, 5.3 and 5.5.
1 Excludes grow th from the approved development agreements, w hich are exempt from paying this impact fee in exchange for building and dedicating a fire station.

Fee Schedule
Table 5.7 shows the maximum justified fire facilities fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space).

The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue, and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 29 Table 5.7: Fire Protection Facilities Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 667 3.41 $ 2,274 $ 45 $ 2,319 $ 1.34 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 460 2.39 $ 1,099 $ 22 $ 1,121 $ 1.12
Office 460 3.12 1,435 29 1,464 1.46
Industrial 460 1.16 534 11 545 0.55
High Cube Warehouse 460 0.72 331 7 338 0.34
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 5.5; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 30 6. Police Facilities
The purpose of the police impact fee is to fund the police facilities needed to serve new development. Moreno Valley currently provides police services from a single police station. A maximum justified fee is presented based on the system plan standard of police facilities per capita.

Service Population
Police facilities serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 6.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for police facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. The 0.31-weighting factor for workers is based on a 40-hour workweek divided by the total number of non-work hours in a week (128) and reflects the degree to which nonresidential development yields a lesser demand for police facilities.

Table 6.1: Police Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 223,800
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 63,100
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 286,900
Weighting factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s police facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
This study uses the system plan methodology to calculate fees for police facilities. Police services in the City of Moreno Valley are presently based out of one facility. Table 6.2 summarizes the City’s current inventory of police land, buildings and vehicles. The unit cost for the land value assumption of $374,000 per acre was based on an analysis of recent sales comparisons. Unit cost assumptions for the replacement cost of buildings were provided by City staff.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 31 Table 6.2: Existing Police Facilities Inventory
Facility Inventory Units Unit Cost1 Value
Public Safety Facility -22850 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos Land 6.41 acres $ 374,000 $ 2,397,340
Police Building 48,115 sq. ft. 220 10,585,300
Subtotal $ 12,982,640
Vehicles and Equipment $ 1,261,192
Total Value of Existing Facilities $ 14,243,832
Sources: City of Moreno Valley; Appendix Table A.5, Willdan Financial Services.

Planned Facilities
Table 6.3 summarizes the planned police facilities needed to serve the City through 2045. The City plans a major conversion and expansion of its Public Safety Building and a joint use station in the Southeast area of the City. Additionally, a share of the debt service costs for police facilities is also allocated to new development. The value of the future payments is discounted into 2023 dollars. See Appendix Table A.2 for additional detail. New facilities costs are estimated to total approximately $102.5 million through 2045.

Table 6.3: Planned Police Facilities
Description Value
Public Safety Building Conversion - Phase I1$ 39,281,500 Public Safety Building Expansion - Phase II & III1 43,337,500 Southeast Moreno Valley Public Safety Joint Use Station1 18,750,000
Debt Service Costs2
1,171,256
Subtotal $ 102,540,256
1 Half of these projects are included in the fire facilities fee and half are included in the police facilities fee. 2 See Appendix Table A.2.

Source: City of Moreno Valley, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25; Appendix Table A.2.

Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” Table 6.4 expresses the City’s current police facilities level of service in terms of an existing cost per capita.

This cost per capita is not used in the fee calculation, rather it is shown here for informational purposes only.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 32 Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the cost per capita shown in Table 6.4. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City has adequate facilities to provide police services to the City. The planned facilities was identified and approved by the City Council in the City’s most recent CIP.

Table 6.4: Existing Level of Service
Value of Existing Facilities $ 14,243,832
Existing Service Population 223,800
Cost per Capita $ 64
Facility Standard per Resident $ 64
Facility Standard per Worker1
20 1
Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 6.1 and 6.2; Willdan Financial Services.

Future Level of Service
Table 6.5 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in police facilities at the planning horizon. This level of service drives the fee calculation. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the planning horizon.

The value per capita is multiplied by the worker weighting factor of 0.31 to determine the value per worker.

Table 6.5: Police Facilities System Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 14,243,832
Value of Planned Facilities 102,540,256
Total System Value (2045) $ 116,784,088
Future Service Population (2045) 286,900
Facility Standard per Resident $ 407
Facility Standard per Worker1 126
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3; Willdan Financial Services.

Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use police facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, and equipment that are part of the system of police facilities serving new development. A list of planned facilities is included in Table 6.3.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 33 Non-Fee Funding Required
Completing the planned facilities will provide a higher value of facilities per capita than is currently provided in Moreno Valley. Impact fee revenue may not be used to increase the level of service provided to existing development. Therefore, impact fee revenue will not fully fund the planned police facilities and some non-fee funding will be required. Table 6.6 shows the projected fee revenue and the non-fee funding required through 2045. After accounting for the projected future impact fee revenue, approximately $82.3 million in non-fee funding will be needed to complete the planned police facilities.

The City will need to use alternative funding sources to fund existing development’s share of the planned police facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

Table 6.6: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita $ 407
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045) 63,100
Fee Revenue $ 25,682,000
Net Cost of Planned Facilities $ 102,540,256
Less Fee Revenue 25,682,000
Plus Existing Fund Balance1
5,456,674
Non-Fee Revenue to be Identified $ 82,314,930
1 Negative fund balance.

Sources: Tables 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4.

Fee Schedule
Table 6.7 shows the maximum justified police facilities fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space).

The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 34 Table 6.7: Police Facilities Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 407 3.41 $ 1,388 $ 28 $ 1,416 $ 0.82 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 126 2.39 $ 301 $ 6 $ 307 $ 0.31
Office 126 3.12 393 8 401 0.40
Industrial 126 1.16 146 3 149 0.15
High Cube Warehouse 126 0.72 91 2 93 0.09
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 6.5; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 35 7. Park Facilities
The purpose of the parkland and park facilities impact fee is to fund the park facilities needed to serve new development. The maximum justified impact fee is presented based on the existing plan standard of parkland and park facilities per capita.

Service Population
Park facilities in Moreno Valley serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 7.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for park facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is far less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. This study assumes worker demand at

0.149 relative to a resident based on a survey conducted by Riverside County of trail use by workers. Since trails are a type of recreational facilities the results of the survey can reasonably be used as a proxy for assumed levels of nonresidential park demand.

Table 7.1: Park Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Census (2020) 208,634
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 215,400
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 61,000
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 276,400
Weighting factor 1.00 0.149
Source: Table 2.1.

Existing Parkland and Park Facilities Inventory
The City of Moreno Valley maintains several park and recreation facilities throughout the city.

Table 7.2 summarizes the City’s existing parkland inventory in 2023. All facilities are owned by the City, or the City has a joint use agreement for their use. The inventory also includes undeveloped raw land and distinguishes the acreage accordingly. Parks are divided into several categories depending on common characteristics. In total, the inventory includes a total of 489.80 acres of City-owned parkland.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 36 Table 7.2: Park Land Inventory
Developed
Acreage
Undeveloped
Acreage
Total
Acreage
Existing Parkland
Adrienne Mitchell Memorial Park 4.43 - 4.43
Aqueduct Linear Park Site 9.05 - 9.05
Bayside Park 2.04 - 2.04
Bethune Park 6.00 - 6.00
Celebration Park 6.65 - 6.65
Civic Center Amphitheater and Park 8.02 - 8.02
Cold Creek Staging Area 0.64 - 0.64
Cottonwood Staging Area 0.40 - 0.40
Cottonwood Golf Center 15.83 - 15.83
El Potrero Park 15.00 - 15.00
Fairway Park 5.50 - 5.50
Gateway Park 7.67 - 7.67
Hidden Springs Park 7.00 - 7.00
Hidden Springs Passive Nature Park 17.00 - 17.00
John F. Kennedy Memorial Park 7.69 - 7.69
Lasselle Sports Park Complex 12.75 - 12.75
March Field Park + Community Center 18.00 75.32 93.32
Moreno Valley Community Park 15.58 - 15.58
Moreno Valley Equestrian Park (and Hound Town) 10.00 35.00 45.00 Morrison Park 14.01 8.00 22.01
Park A - 42.30 42.30
Parque Amistad 4.24 - 4.24
Patriot Park 0.50 - 0.50
Pedrorena Park 5.50 - 5.50
Rancho Verde Park - 3.49 3.49
Rancho Verde Equestrian Staging Area 1.30 - 1.30
Ridge Crest Park 5.00 - 5.00
Rock Ridge Park 1.93 - 1.93
Santiago Park 2.84 - 2.84
Senior Community Center 2.21 - 2.21
Shadow Mountain Park 10.00 - 10.00
Sunnymead Equestrian Station 0.14 - 0.14
Sunnymead Park 15.53 - 15.53
Sunnymead Ranch Linear Park 1.38 - 1.38
TownGate Memorial Park 8.06 - 8.06
TownGate Memorial Park II 8.91 - 8.91
Victoriano Park 5.00 - 5.00
Vista Lomas Park 4.00 - 4.00
Westbluff Park 5.00 - 5.00
Weston Park 4.14 - 4.14
Woodland Park 9.11 - 9.11
Subtotal 278.05 164.11 442.16
Multi-Use/Equestrian Trails - 22.64 22.64
Joint Use Agreements
College Park 18.00 7.00 25.00
Total - Existing Parkland 296.05 193.75 489.80
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 37 Table 7.3 summarizes the City’s inventory of park buildings, equipment and special facilities. The total value of these facilities is divided by the total developed park acres to determine the value of existing park buildings, equipment and special facilities per acre.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 38 Table 7.3: Park Building Inventory
Facility Address
Square
Feet
Replacement
Cost
Adrienne Mitchell Memorial Park
Park Shelter 22631 Bay Avenue 842 $ 126,300
Bayside Park
Park Shelter 24435 Bay Avenue 270 $ 40,500
Bethune Park
Restroom 1,305 $ 1,044,000
Shelter 1 16745 Kitching Street 576 86,400
Shelter 2 16746 Kitching Street 576 86,400
Shelter 3 16747 Kitching Street 576 86,400
Shelter 4 16748 Kitching Street 576 86,400
Celebration Park
Restroom 14965 Morgan Avenue 1,600 $ 1,280,000
Shelter 1 14965 Morgan Avenue 2,498 374,700
Shelter 2 14965 Morgan Avenue 260 39,000
Shelter 3 14965 Morgan Avenue 260 39,000
Civic Center Amphitheater $ 3,000,000
Cottonwood Equestrian Staging Area
Shelter 28590 Cottonwood Ave 400 $ 60,000
El Potrero Park
Restroom 1 16901 Lasselle Street 350 $ 280,000
Restroom 2 16901 Lasselle Street 350 280,000
Shelter 16901 Lasselle Street 375 56,250
Fairway Park
Restroom 27891 John F Kennedy Drive 336 $ 268,800
Shelter 27891 John F Kennedy Drive 224 33,600
Gateway Park
Restroom 23975 Manzanita Avenue 360 $ 288,000
Shelter 1 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Shelter 2 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Shelter 3 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Shelter 4 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Shelter 5 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Shelter 6 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Shelter 7 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Shelter 8 23975 Manzanita Avenue 108 16,200
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 39 Table 7.3: Park Building Inventory - Continued
Facility Address
Square
Feet
Replacement
Cost
Hidden Springs Park
Shelter 9675 Hidden Springs Drive 224 $ 33,600
JFK Park
Restroom 15115 Indian Street 696 $ 556,800
Shelter 1 15115 Indian Street 144 21,600
Shelter 2 15115 Indian Street 144 21,600
Shelter 3 15115 Indian Street 546 81,900
Lassele Sports Park
Restroom/Concession/Storage 17155 Lasselle St 2,480 $ 2,232,000 Shelter 1 17155 Lasselle St 1,824 273,600
Shelter 2 17155 Lasselle St 1,200 180,000
Moreno Valley Community Park
Restroom / Concession 13380 Frederick Street 1,800 $ 1,620,000 Shelter 1 13380 Frederick Street 180 27,000
Shelter 2 13380 Frederick Street 180 27,000
Shelter 3 13380 Frederick Street 180 27,000
Shelter 4 13380 Frederick Street 144 21,600
Morrison Park
Restroom 26667 Dracaea Avenue 540 $ 432,000
Storage Building 26667 Dracaea Avenue 374 112,200
Concession Stand 26667 Dracaea Avenue 625 375,000
Shelter 1 26667 Dracaea Avenue 144 21,600
Shelter 2 26667 Dracaea Avenue 144 21,600
Shelter 3 26667 Dracaea Avenue 400 60,000
Parque Amistad
Shelter 26160 Gentian Avenue 1,040 $ 156,000
Pedrorena Park
Restroom 16009 Rancho Del Lago 540 $ 432,000
Shelter 16009 Rancho Del Lago 224 33,600
Ridgecrest Park
Restroom 28506 John F Kennedy Drive 336 $ 268,800
Shelter 1 28506 John F Kennedy Drive 144 21,600
Shelter 2 28506 John F Kennedy Drive 375 56,250
Shelter 3 28506 John F Kennedy Drive 375 56,250
Rock Ridge Park
Shelter 1 27119 Waterford Way 740 $ 111,000
Shelter 2 27119 Waterford Way 740 111,000
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 40 Table 7.3: Park Building Inventory - Continued
Facility Address
Square
Feet
Replacement
Cost
Santiago Park
Restroom 24731 Tiger Ave 529 $ 423,200
Shelter 1 24731 Tiger Ave 375 56,250
Shelter 2 24731 Tiger Ave 1,500 225,000
Sunnymead Park
Restroom/Concession 12655 Perris Blvd 1,864 $ 1,677,600 Shelter 1 12655 Perris Blvd 208 31,200
Shelter 2 12655 Perris Blvd 208 31,200
Town Gate Memorial Park
Restroom 13051 Elsworth Street 470 $ 376,000
Shelter 1 13051 Elsworth Street 750 112,500
Shelter 2 13051 Elsworth Street 665 99,750
Shelter 3 13051 Elsworth Street 259 38,850
Valley Skate Park
Restroom / Concession 15415 6th Street 936 $ 842,400
Victoriano Park
Restroom 25730 Los Cabos Drive 350 $ 280,000
Shelter 25730 Los Cabos Drive 224 33,600
West Bluff Park
Restroom 10750 Pigeon Pass Road 240 $ 192,000
Shelter 10750 Pigeon Pass Road 260 39,000
Weston Park
Restroom 13170 Lasselle Avenue 375 $ 300,000
Shelter 1 13170 Lasselle Avenue 144 21,600
Shelter 2 13170 Lasselle Avenue 216 32,400
Shelter 3 13170 Lasselle Avenue 216 32,400
Shelter 4 13170 Lasselle Avenue 216 32,400
Woodland Park
Restroom 25705 Cactus Avenue 540 $ 432,000
Shelter 1 25705 Cactus Avenue 738 110,700
Shelter 2 25705 Cactus Avenue 300 45,000
Shadow Mountain Park
Shelter 23239 Presidio Hills Dr. 1,146 $ 171,900
Restroom 23239 Presidio Hills Dr. 271 216,800
Vista Lomas Park
Shelter 26700 Iris Avenue 696 $ 104,400
Total Replacement Cost - Park Buildings $21,036,100
Developed Park Acres 296.05
Park Buildings Cost per Acre (rounded) $ 71,100
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 41 Parkland and Park Facilities Unit Costs
Table 7.4 displays the unit costs necessary to develop parkland in Moreno Valley. The buildings, equipment and special facilities cost per acre from Table 7.3 is added to the cost of an acre of standard park improvements to determine the total improvement cost per acre. A value of $374,000 per acre for land is also included and is consistent with other land assumptions used in this analysis. In total, this analysis assumes that it costs $1.2 million to acquire and develop an acre of parkland in Moreno Valley.

Table 7.4: Park Facilities Unit Costs
Cost
Per Acre Share
Improvements
Standard Park Improvements $ 800,000
Park Buildings 71,100
Subtotal $ 871,100 70.0%
Land Acquisition $ 374,000 30.0%
Total Cost per Acre $ 1,245,100 100.0%
Sources: City of Moreno Valley; Willdan Financial Services.

Parkland and Park Facility Standards
Park facility standards establish a reasonable relationship between new development and the need for expanded parkland and park facilities. Information regarding the City’s existing inventory of existing parks facilities was obtained from City staff.

The most common measure in calculating new development’s demand for parks is the ratio of park acres per resident. In general, facility standards may be based on the Mitigation Fee Act (using a city’s existing inventory of parkland and park facilities), or an adopted policy standard contained in a master facility plan or general plan. Facility standards may also be based on a land dedication standard established by the Quimby Act.
2 In this case, the City will use the Mitigation
Fee Act to impose park impact fees for development not occurring in subdivisions and will use the Quimby Act for development occurring in subdivisions.

Mitigation Fee Act
The Mitigation Fee Act does not dictate use of a particular type or level of facility standard for public facilities fees. To comply with the findings required under the law, facility standards must not burden new development with any cost associated with facility deficiencies attributable to existing development.3 In this case, the fees will be set at a 3.0 acre per 1,000 resident standard for new development, consistent with the City’s Park and Recreation Facilities Master Plan. 2 California Government Code §66477.
3 See the Benefit and Burden findings in Background Report.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 42 Because this standard is higher than the City’s existing parkland standard, this study identifies a deficiency that must be funded by funding sources other than impact fees in order to bring existing development up to the higher level of service.

Quimby Act
The Quimby Act specifies that the dedication requirement must be a minimum of 3.0 acres and a maximum of 5.0 acres per 1,000 residents. A jurisdiction can require residential developers to dedicate above the three-acre minimum if the jurisdiction’s existing park standard at the time it adopted its Quimby Act ordinance justifies the higher level (up to five acres per 1,000 residents).

The standard used must also conform to the jurisdiction’s adopted general or specific plan standards.

The Quimby Act only applies to land subdivisions. The Quimby Act would not apply to residential development on future approved projects on single parcels, such as apartment complexes and other multifamily development.

The Quimby Act allows payment of a fee in lieu of land dedication. The fee is calculated to fund acquisition of the same amount of land that would have been dedicated.

The Quimby Act allows use of in-lieu fee revenue for any park or recreation facility purpose.

Allowable uses of this revenue include land acquisition, park improvements including recreation facilities, and rehabilitation of existing park and recreation facilities.

City of Moreno Valley Parkland and Park Facilities Standards Table 7.5 shows the existing standards of park land and park improvements per 1,000 residents.

In total the City has an existing parkland standard of 2.34 acres per 1,000 residents of land, and

1.91 acres per 1,000 residents of park improvements. Because the existing land standard is less than 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents, the City can charge a fee in-lieu of land dedication at 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents under the Quimby Act. For development not subject to the Quimby Act, the fee analysis in this report will be also based on providing a 3.0 acre of land and improvements per 1,000 service population standard as new development adds demand for parks in Moreno Valley.

Table 7.5: Park Standards
Land Improvements
Developed Park Acreage 504.41 411.16
Service Population (2023) 215,400 215,400
Existing Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 2.34 1.91 Quimby Act Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 3.00
Sources: Tables 7.1 and 7.2.

Facilities Needed to Accommodate New Development
Table 7.6 shows the park facilities needed to accommodate new development at the 3.0 acre per 1,000 resident standard. To achieve the standard by the planning horizon, new residential development must fund the purchase and improvement of 177.3 parkland acres, at a total cost of $220.8 million. New nonresidential development must fund the acquisition and improvement of

5.7 acres of parks at a cost of $7.1 million.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 43 Table 7.6: Park Facilities to Accommodate New Development Calculation Parkland Improvements Total
Residential
Parkland (Quimby Act or Mitigation Fee Act), Improvements (Mitigation Fee Act) 1 Facility Standard (acres/1,000 residents) A 3.00 3.00
Service Population Growth (2023-2045) B 59,100 59,100
Facility Needs (acres) C = (B / 1,000) x A 177.30 177.30 Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 374,000 $ 871,100
Cost of Parkland To Serve Development E = C x D $66,310,200 $ 154,446,030 $ 220,756,230 Nonresidential
Parkland and Improvements - Mitigation Fee Act 2
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 residents) F 3.00 3.00
Service Population Growth (2023-2045) G 1,900 1,900
Facility Needs (acres) H = (G / 1,000) / F 5.70 5.70
Average Unit Cost (per acre) D $ 374,000 $ 871,100
Cost of Parkland To Serve Development I = H x D $ 2,131,800 $ 4,965,270 $ 7,097,070 Total $ 227,853,300
2 Cost of parkland to serve new nonresidential
Sources: Tables 7.1, 7.4 and 7.6.
1 Cost of parkland to serve new residential development show n if all development is subject to the Quimby Act (Subdivisions of 50 units or more). Parkland and improvements charged at 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents standard.

Existing Deficiencies
Since the City’s existing park standards are less than the standard used to calculate the Mitigation Fee Act fees, the City must identify an existing deficiency that cannot be funded by impact fees in order to bring existing development up to the desired level of service. Table 7.7 quantifies the existing park deficiency by first identifying the total acres needed to meet the 3.0 acre standard in 2023, then subtracting the currently existing park acres from the total acres needed to meet the standard. The result is the currently deficient acres. Unit cost assumptions from Table 7.4 are then used to estimate the cost of the existing deficiency.

The City can use any funding source other than impact fees to rectify the existing deficiency.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 44 Table 7.7: Existing Deficiency
Land Improvements Total
Existing Service Population 215,400 215,400
Policy Standard (Acres per 1,000 Capita) 3.00 3.00
Acres Needed to Meet Standard in 2023 646.20 646.20
Current Park Acres 489.80 296.05
Deficiency 156.40 350.15
Cost per Acre $ 374,000 $ 871,100
Total Cost to Remedy Deficiency $ 58,493,600 $ 305,015,665 $ 363,509,265 Sources: Tables 7.1, 7.2 and 7.4.

Parks Cost per Capita
Table 7.8 shows the cost per capita of providing new parkland and park facilities at the existing facility standard, and at the Quimby standard. The cost per capita is shown separately for land and improvements. The cost per capita is shown separately for land and improvements. The costs per capita in this table will serve as the basis of three fees:
• A Quimby Act Fee in-lieu of land dedication. This fee is payable by residential development occurring in subdivisions.
• A Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition. This fee is payable by residential and nonresidential development not occurring in subdivisions. • A Mitigation Fee Act Fee for parkland improvements. This fee is payable by all development.

A development project pays either the Quimby Act Fee in-lieu of land dedication, or the Mitigation Fee Act Fee for land acquisition, not both. All development projects pay the Mitigation Fee Act Fee for park improvements.

Table 7.8: Cost per Capita - Existing Level of Service
Improvements
Calculation Quimby Fee Impact Fee Impact Fee
Parkland Investment (per acre) A $ 374,000 $ 374,000 $ 871,100 Level of Service (acres per 1,000 capita) B 3.00 3.00 3.00 Total Cost Per 1,000 capita C = A x B $ 1,122,000 $1,122,000 $ 2,613,300 Cost per Resident D = C / 1,000 $ 1,122 $ 1,122 $ 2,613 Cost per Worker E = D x 0.149 N/A 167 389
Sources: Tables 7.5 and 7.6.

Land
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 45 Use of Fee Revenue
The City plans to use parkland and park facilities fee revenue to purchase parkland or construct improvements to add to the system of park facilities that serves new development. The City may only use impact fee revenue to provide facilities and intensify usage of existing facilities needed to serve new development.

Fee Schedule
To calculate fees by land use type, the investment in park facilities is determined on a per capita basis for both land acquisition and improvement. These cost factors (shown in Table 7.8) are cost per capita based on the unit cost estimates and facility standards. The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

Table 7.9 shows the park facilities fee based on a 3.0 acre per 1,000 resident standard. The City would collect the fee based on only one of the two approaches as appropriate. Each fee includes a component for park improvements, also based on a 3.0 acre per 1,000 resident standard.

The total fee includes an administrative charge to fund costs that include: (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 46 Table 7.9: Park Facilities Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Base Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential
Single Family
Parkland $ 1,122 3.41 $ 3,826 $ 77 $ 3,903 $ 2.26
Improvements 2,613 3.41 8,910 178 9,088 5.26
Total $ 3,735 $12,736 $ 12,991 $ 7.51
Nonresidential
Commercial
Parkland $ 167 2.39 $ 399 $ 8 $ 407 $ 0.41
Improvements 389 2.39 930 19 949 0.95
Total $ 556 $ 1,329 $ 1,356 $ 1.36
Office
Parkland $ 167 3.12 $ 521 $ 10 $ 531 $ 0.53
Improvements 389 3.12 1,214 24 1,238 1.24
Total $ 556 $ 1,735 $ 1,769 $ 1.77
Industrial
Parkland $ 167 1.16 $ 194 $ 4 $ 198 $ 0.20
Improvements 389 1.16 451 9 460 0.46
Total $ 556 $ 645 $ 658 $ 0.66
High Cube Warehouse
Parkland $ 167 0.72 $ 120 $ 2 $ 122 $ 0.12
Improvements 389 0.72 280 6 286 0.29
Total $ 556 $ 400 $ 408 $ 0.41
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 7.9.
2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 47 8. Recreation Facilities
The following chapter documents the nexus analysis, demonstrating the need for new recreation and community center facilities demanded by new development.

Service Population
Recreation facilities in Moreno Valley serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 8.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for recreation facilities.

While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is far less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. This study assumes worker demand at

0.149 relative to a resident based on a survey conducted by Riverside County of trail use by workers. Since trails are a type of recreational facilities the results of the survey can reasonably be used as a proxy for assumed levels of nonresidential recreation facilities demand.

Table 8.1: Recreation Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 215,400
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 61,000
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 276,400
Weighting factor 1.00 0.149
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Existing Recreation and Community Center Facilities
Inventory
The City of Moreno Valley maintains several recreation and community center facilities. Table 8.2 summarizes the City’s existing recreation and community center facilities inventory. All facilities are located within the City limits. In total, the City owns approximately $41.7 million in recreation and community center facilities.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 48 Table 8.2: Existing Recreation Facilities
Facility Address Amount Units Unit Cost Value
Land
Senior Center1 25075 Fir Avenue - acres $ 374,000 $ -
March Field Park Community Center1 15325 5th Street 938 - acres 374,000 - March Annex 15450 4th Street 823 3.88 acres 374,000 1,451,100 Equestrian Center1 11150 Redlands Blvd - acres 374,000 - Moreno Valley Recreation & Conference Center 14075 Frederick Street 18.64 acres 374,000 6,971,400 Town Gate Community Center1
13100 Arbor Park Lane - acres 374,000 -
Subtotal 22.52 acres $ 8,422,500
Buildings
Senior Center 25075 Fir Avenue 14,700 sq. ft. $ 183 $ 2,686,600 March Field Park Community Center 15325 5th Street 938 14,524 sq. ft. 180 2,613,200 March Annex 15450 4th Street 823 4,266 sq. ft. 180 767,551 Cottonwood Golf Center1 13671 Frederick Street 9,060 sq. ft. 180 1,630,101 Equestrian Center 11150 Redlands Blvd 1,200 sq. ft. 94 113,200 Moreno Valley Recreation & Conference Center 14075 Frederick Street 42,413 sq. ft. 220 9,330,860 Town Gate Community Center 13100 Arbor Park Lane 4,000 sq. ft. 220 880,000 March Field Hobby Shop1 941 Short Street 7,970 sq. ft. 42 337,200 Civic Center Amphitheater2 n/a 157,625
Subtotal 98,133 sq. ft. $18,516,337
Total $26,938,837
2 Recreation facilities DIF contribution to amphitheater show n here. 1 Land acreage included in the parks section. Excluded here to avoid double counting.

Sources: City of Moreno Valley; Willdan Financial Services.

Planned Recreation and Community Center Facilities
The City has planned several recreation and community center facilities to serve new development. Included in the plans are both expansions to existing facilities and the new construction of facilities. In total, the City has identified $87.5 million of recreation and community center facilities to serve existing and new development. Table 8.3 details the City’s planned recreation and community center facilities.

Table 8.3: Planned Recreation Facilities
Total
Moreno Valley Equestrian Center1$ 936,000
New Recreation and Youth Center 26,500,000
New Senior Center 37,500,000
Parks Community Recreation Buildings 22,545,000
Total $ 87,481,000
1 Restroom and Information Center.

Source: City of Moreno Valley, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 49 Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” Table 8.4 expresses the City’s current recreation facilities level of service in terms of an existing cost per capita. This cost per capita is not used in the fee calculation, rather it is shown here for informational purposes only.

Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the cost per capita shown in Table 8.4. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City can fund the planned recreation facilities that have been identified and approved by the City Council in the City’s most recent CIP.

Table 8.4: Existing Level of Service
Value of Existing Facilities $ 26,938,837
Existing Fund Balance 77,518
Total $ 27,016,355
Existing Service Population 215,400
Facility Standard per Resident $ 125
Facility Standard per Worker1
19 1
Based on a w eighing factor of 0.149.

Sources: Tables 8.1 and 8.2; Willdan Financial Services.

Future Level of Service
Table 8.5 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in recreation facilities at the planning horizon. This level of service drives the fee calculation. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the planning horizon.

The value per capita is multiplied by the worker weighting factor of 0.149 to determine the value per worker.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 50 Table 8.5: Recreation Facilities System Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 26,938,837
Cost of Planned Facilities 87,481,000
Total System Value (2045) $ 114,419,837
Future Service Population (2045) 276,400
Facility Standard per Resident $ 414
Facility Standard per Worker1
62 1
Based on a w eighing factor of 0.149.

Sources: Tables 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3; Willdan Financial Services.

Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use recreation facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, vehicles and equipment that are part of the system of recreation facilities serving new development. A list of planned facilities is included in Table 8.3.

Fee Revenue Projection
The City plans to use recreation and community center facilities fee revenue to construct improvements to add to the system of recreation and community center facilities that serves existing and new development. The list of facilities to be funded by the fee is detailed above in Table 8.3. Table 8.6 details a projection of fee revenue, based on the service population growth increment identified in Table 8.1. The cost of the planned facilities not funded by fee revenue represents existing development’s share of the facilities and can be funded by any revenue source other than impact fees.

Table 8.6: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita $ 414
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045) 61,000
Fee Revenue $ 25,254,000
Cost of Planned Facilities $ 87,481,000
Fee Revenue 25,254,000
Less Existing Fund Balance 77,518
Non-Fee Revenue to be Identified $ 62,149,482
Sources: Tables 8.1, 8.3 and 8.4.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 51 Fee Schedule
Table 8.7 shows the maximum justified recreation and community center facilities fee schedule.

The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit densities (persons per dwelling). The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two-percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 8.7: Recreation Facilities Fee - System Standard
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 414 3.41 $ 1,412 $ 28 $ 1,440 $ 0.83 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 62 2.39 $ 147 $ 3 $ 150 $ 0.15
Office 62 3.12 192 4 196 0.20
Industrial 62 1.16 72 1 73 0.07
High Cube Warehouse 62 0.72 44 1 45 0.05
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 8.5; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 52 9. Library Facilities
The following chapter documents the nexus analysis, demonstrating the need for new library facilities to serve by new development.

Service Population
Library facilities in Moreno Valley serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 9.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for library facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is far less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. While specific worker demand factors for Moreno Valley are not available, this study conservatively assumes worker demand at 0.10 relative to a resident.

Table 9.1: Library Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 212,900
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 60,400
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 273,300
Weighting factor 1.00 0.10
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Existing Library Facilities
The amount of existing library facilities that the City owns will be used to inform the facility standards in this analysis. The City currently operates one 15,000 square foot library sited on

1.46 acres of land. The City also has two satellite library facilities. Table 9.2 summarizes the City’s existing library facility inventory. Only facilities owned by the City are included in the inventory.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 53 Table 9.2: Existing Library Facilities
Inventory Units Unit Cost Value
Public Library - 25480 Alessandro Blvd
Land 1.46 Acres $ 374,000 $ 546,040
Library 15,000 Sq. Ft. 250 3,754,900
Subtotal $ 4,300,940
Satellite Library Facilities
Moreno Valley Mall (Tenant Improvements) 4,795 Sq. Ft. 150 $ 719,250 Southeast Satellite Library 4,128 Sq. Ft. 182 750,000
Subtotal 8,923 $ 1,469,250
Total Value of Existing Facilities $ 5,770,190
Sources: City of Moreno Valley.

Planned Facilities
Table 9.3 summarizes the planned library facility needed to serve the City through 2045. The City plans to construct an additional satellite library, a new main library and a new public library to serve all residents of the City. In all, the projects are estimated to cost approximately $97.5 million.

Table 9.3: Planned Library Facilities
Total
Library Satellite Facility $ 2,000,000
Main Library 47,513,000
New Public Library 48,000,000
Total $97,513,000
Source: City of Moreno Valley, Adopted Capital
Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25.

Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” Table 9.4 expresses the City’s current recreation facilities level of service in terms of an existing cost per capita. This cost per capita is not used in the fee calculation, rather it is shown here for informational purposes only.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 54 Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the cost per capita shown in Table 9.4. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City can fund the planned library facilities that have been identified and approved by the City Council in the City’s most recent CIP.

Table 9.4: Existing Level of Service
Value of Existing Facilities $ 5,770,190
Existing Fund Balance 5,471,415
Total $ 11,241,605
Existing Service Population 212,900
Facility Standard per Resident $ 53
Facility Standard per Worker1
5 1
Based on a w eighing factor of 0.10.

Sources: Tables 9.1 and 9.2; Willdan Financial Services.

Future Level of Service
Table 9.5 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in library facilities at the planning horizon. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the planning horizon. The value per capita is multiplied by the worker weighting factor of 0.10 to determine the value per worker.

Table 9.5: Library Facilities System Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 5,770,190
Cost of Planned Facilities 97,513,000
Total System Value (2045) $ 103,283,190
Future Service Population (2045) 273,300
Facility Standard per Resident $ 378
Facility Standard per Worker1 38
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.10.

Sources: Tables 9.1, 9.2 and 9.3; Willdan Financial Services.

Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use library facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, vehicles and collections that are part of the system of library facilities serving new development. A list of planned facilities is included in Table 9.3.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 55 Fee Revenue Projection
The City plans to use recreation and library facilities fee revenue to construct improvements to add to the system of library facilities that serves new development. The preliminary list of facilities to be funded by the fee is detailed above in Table 9.3. Table 9.6 details a projection of fee revenue, based on the service population growth increment identified in Table 9.1. The cost of the planned facilities not funded by fee revenue represents existing development’s share of the facilities and can be funded by any revenue source other than impact fees.

Table 9.6: Library Impact Fee Revenue
Projection
Cost per Capita $ 378
Growth in Service Population 60,400
Projected Impact Fee Revenue $ 22,831,200
Cost of Planned Facilities $ 97,513,000
Projected Impact Fee Revenue 22,831,200
Less Existing Fund Balance 5,471,415
Non-Fee Revenue to Be Identified $ 69,210,385
Sources: Tables 9.1, 9.3 and 9.5; Willdan Financial Services.

Fee Schedule
Table 9.7 shows the maximum justified library facilities fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit densities (persons per dwelling). The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two-percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 56 Table 9.7: Library Facilities Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 378 3.41 $ 1,289 $ 26 $ 1,315 $ 0.76 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 38 2.39 $ 90 $ 2 $ 92 $ 0.09
Office 38 3.12 118 2 120 0.12
Industrial 38 1.16 44 1 45 0.05
High Cube Warehouse 38 0.72 27 1 28 0.03
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 9.5; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 57 10. City Hall Facilities
The purpose of the fee is to ensure that new development funds its fair share of city hall facilities.

A fee schedule is presented based on the planned facilities standard of city hall facilities in the City of Moreno Valley to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet its needs.

Service Population
City hall facilities serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 10.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for city hall facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. The 0.31-weighting factor for workers is based on a 40-hour workweek divided by the total number of non-work hours in a week (128) and reflects the degree to which nonresidential development yields a lesser demand for city hall facilities.

Table 10.1: City Hall Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 223,800
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 63,100
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 286,900
Weighting factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s police facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
This study uses the existing standard methodology to calculate fees for city hall facilities. The city hall inventory is comprised of three properties: city hall, the city hall annex and the civic center. In total, the City owns approximately $347.3 million in city hall and administrative facilities.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 58 Table 10.2: City Hall Facilities Inventory
Inventory Unit Cost Value
Land (acres)
City Hall 3.32 $374,000 $ 1,241,700
City Hall Annex 1.02 374,000 381,500
Civic Center1 24.83 374,000 9,286,400
Subtotal 29.17 $ 10,909,600
Buildings (square feet)
City Hall 55,744 $ 284 $ 15,831,296
Annex Complex 11,668 202 2,352,300
Subtotal 67,412 $ 18,183,596
City Hall Parking Lots $ 2,760,691
Vehicles and Equipment $ 2,460,980
Total Value of Existing Facilities $ 34,314,867
1 Excludes 8.02 acres included in the park inventory for the Civic Center Amphitheater and Park.

Sources: City of Moreno Valley; Appendix Table A.5, Willdan Financial Services.

Cost Allocation
Table 10.3 shows the calculation of the existing cost per capita facility standard by dividing the value of the existing facilities inventory by the existing service population. The resulting cost per capita is the basis of the impact fee. Funding facilities at this level will ensure that as development occurs, new development will contribute to city hall facilities at the same standard that existing development has contributed thus far. Using the existing standard methodology does not result in existing deficiencies.

Table 10.3: City Hall Facilities Existing Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 34,314,867
Existing Fund Balance 1,017,933
Total $ 35,332,800
Existing Service Population 223,800
Cost per Capita $ 158
Facility Standard per Resident $ 158
Facility Standard per Worker1 49
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 10.1 and 10.2; Willdan Financial Services.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 59 Fee Revenue Projection
The City plans to use city hall facilities fee revenue to construct improvements to add to the system of city hall and administrative facilities to serve new development. Table 10.4 details a projection of fee revenue, based on the service population growth increment identified in Table

10.1. The City will have to identify $10.8 million worth of city hall facilities in order to ensure that the existing standard is maintained through the planning horizon.

Table 10.4: Revenue Projection - Existing Standard
Cost per Capita $ 158
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045) 63,100
Fee Revenue $ 9,970,000
Sources: Tables 10.1 and 10.3.

Fee Schedule
Table 10.5 shows the maximum justified city hall fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space). The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 60 Table 10.5: City Hall Facilities Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D E / 1,000
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 158 3.41 $ 539 $ 11 $ 550 $ 0.32 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 49 2.39 $ 117 $ 2 $ 119 $ 0.12
Office 49 3.12 153 3 156 0.16
Industrial 49 1.16 57 1 58 0.06
High Cube Warehouse 49 0.72 35 1 36 0.04
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 10.3; Willdan Financial Services 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 61 11. Corporation Yard Facilities
The purpose of the corporation yard facilities impact fee is to fund the corporation yard facilities needed to serve new development. A maximum justified fee schedule is presented based on the system plan standard of corporation yard facilities per capita.

Service Population
Corporation yard facilities serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 11.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for corporation yard facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. The 0.31-weighting factor for workers is based on a 40-hour workweek divided by the total number of non-work hours in a week (128) and reflects the degree to which nonresidential development yields a lesser demand for corporation yard facilities.

Table 11.1: Corporation Yard Facilities Service Population Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 223,800
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 63,100
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 286,900
Weighting factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s corporation yard facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
Table 11.2 summarizes the City’s current inventory of land, buildings and vehicles. The City currently operates out of one maintenance yard, with three buildings for shops and storage. In total, the City owns $8 million in corporation yard facilities.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 62 Table 11.2: Corporation Yard Facilities Existing Inventory Inventory Unit Cost Value
Land (acres)
Maintenance Yard 18.16 $374,000 $6,791,800
Utility Field Office 2.32 374,000 867,680
Subtotal 18.16 $7,659,480
Buildings (square feet)
Corporate Yard (Big Barn, Fleet, & Perris Office)1 63,142 $ - $ - Santiago Office 5,264 48 252,000
Utility Field Office 2,000 48 95,745
Subtotal 70,406 $ 347,745
Total Value of Existing Facilities $8,007,225
1 No value is show n for this facility because it w ill be replaced by the planned facilities.

Sources: City of Moreno Valley; Willdan Financial Services.

Planned Facilities
Table 11.3 summarizes the planned facilities. The facilities will serve both existing and new development and are estimated to cost $155 million.

Table 11.3: Planned Corporation Yard Facilities
Total
Corporate Yard Master Plan Build Out $ 95,000,000
New Corporate Yard Building to Replace Existing Barn 60,000,000 Total $ 155,000,000
Source: City of Moreno Valley, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25.

Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” Table 11.4 expresses the City’s current recreation facilities level of service in terms of an existing cost per capita. This cost per capita is not used in the fee calculation, rather it is shown here for informational purposes only.

Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the cost per capita shown in Table 11.4. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City can fund J.1.d
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 63 the planned corporation yard facilities that have been identified and approved by the City Council in the City’s most recent CIP.

Table 11.4: Existing Level of Service
Value of Existing Facilities $ 8,007,225
Existing Fund Balance 2,425,159
Total $ 10,432,384
Existing Service Population 223,800
Cost per Capita $ 47
Facility Standard per Resident $ 47
Facility Standard per Worker1
15 1
Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 11.1 and 11.2.

Future Level of Service
Table 11.5 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in corporation yard facilities at the planning horizon. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the planning horizon. The value per capita is multiplied by the worker weighting factor of 0.31 to determine the value per worker.

Table 11.5: Corporation Yard Facilities - System
Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 8,007,225
Value of Planned Facilities 155,000,000
Total System Value (2045) $ 163,007,225
Future Service Population (2045) 286,900
Cost per Capita $ 568
Facility Standard per Resident $ 568
Facility Standard per Worker1 176
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 11.1, 11.2 and 11.3.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 64 Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use corporation yard facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, and equipment that are part of the system of corporation yard facilities serving new development. The City intends to build a new corporation yard.

Non-Fee Funding Required
Completing the planned facilities will provide a higher value of facilities per capita than is currently provided in Moreno Valley. Impact fee revenue may not be used to increase the level of service provided to existing development. Therefore, impact fee revenue will not fully fund the planned corporation yard facilities and some non-fee funding will be required. Table 11.6 shows the projected fee revenue and the non-fee funding required through 2045. After accounting for the projected future impact fee revenue, approximately $116.7 million in non-fee funding will be needed to complete the planned corporation yard facilities.

The City will need to use alternative funding sources to fund existing development’s share of the planned corporation yard facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

Table 11.6: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita $ 568
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045) 63,100
Fee Revenue $ 35,841,000
Cost of Planned Facilities $ 155,000,000
Fee Revenue 35,841,000
Less Existing Fund Balance 2,425,159
Non-Fee Revenue to be Identified $ 116,733,841
Sources: Tables 11.1, 11.3 and 11.5.

Fee Schedule
Table 11.7 shows the maximum justified corporation yard facilities fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space). The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the J.1.d
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 65 charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 11.7: Corporation Yard Facilities Impact Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 568 3.41 $ 1,937 $ 39 $ 1,976 $ 1.14 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 176 2.39 $ 421 $ 8 $ 429 $ 0.43
Office 176 3.12 549 11 560 0.56
Industrial 176 1.16 204 4 208 0.21
High Cube Warehouse 176 0.72 127 3 130 0.13
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 11.5; Willdan Financial Services 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 66 12. Maintenance Equipment
Facilities
The purpose of the maintenance equipment impact fee is to fund the maintenance equipment facilities needed to serve new development. Note that impact fees cannot fund road maintenance itself. These fees are intended to fund the capital facilities equipment needed to maintain the City’s roads. Maintenance equipment includes vehicles, heavy equipment, tractors and other various items.

Service Population
Table 12.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for road maintenance facilities. While specific data is not available to estimate the actual ratio of demand per resident to demand by businesses (per worker) for this service, it is reasonable to assume that demand for these services is less for one employee compared to one resident, because nonresidential buildings are typically occupied less intensively than dwelling units. The 0.31-weighting factor for workers is based on a 40-hour workweek divided by the total number of non-work hours in a week (128) and reflects the degree to which nonresidential development yields a lesser demand for road maintenance facilities.

Table 12.1: Maintenance Equipment Facilities Service
Population
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 207,700 52,000 223,800
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100 12,900 63,100
Total (2045) 266,800 64,900 286,900
Weighting factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s maintenance equipment facility inventory, facility standards, and cost of planned facilities.

Existing Inventory
Table 12.2 summarizes the City’s current inventory of maintenance equipment facilities. The estimated value shown for maintenance equipment vehicles was provided by the City.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 67 Table 12.2: Maintenance
Equipment Facilities Inventory
Value
Heavy Duty Trucks $ 4,416,476
Light Duty Trucks 4,473,212
Machinery & Equipment 4,892,662
Total $ 13,782,350
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

Cost Allocation
Table 12.3 shows the existing standard cost per capita for maintenance equipment facilities, which is the per capita investment in maintenance equipment facilities that new development must make to maintain the existing standards. This value is calculated by dividing the cost of existing maintenance equipment facilities by the existing service population.

Table 12.3: Maintenance Equipment Facilities
Existing Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 13,782,350
Existing Fund Balance 1,132,374
Total $ 14,914,724
Existing Service Population 223,800
Cost per Capita $ 67
Facility Standard per Resident $ 67
Facility Standard per Worker1 21
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 12.1 and 12.2.

Fee Revenue Projection
Non-fee funding will not be required because the fee simply maintains the existing standard. The impact revenue generated by the fee will fully fund the facilities to serve new development.

Additional planned facilities will need to be identified to maintain the existing standard. Table 12.4 identifies the amount of maintenance equipment facilities that will need to be acquired by 2045 to maintain the existing standard.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 68 Table 12.4: Revenue Projection - Existing Standard
Cost per Capita $ 67
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045) 63,100
Fee Revenue $ 4,228,000
Sources: Tables 12.1 and 12.3.

Fee Schedule
Table 12.5 shows the maximum justified maintenance equipment facilities fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space). The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and Citywide administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 12.5: Maintenance Equipment Facilities Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 67 3.41 $ 228 $ 5 $ 233 $ 0.13 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Commercial $ 21 2.39 $ 50 $ 1 $ 51 $ 0.05
Office 21 3.12 66 1 67 0.07
Industrial 21 1.16 24 0 24 0.02
High Cube Warehouse 21 0.72 15 0 15 0.02
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 12.3; Willdan Financial Services 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 69 13. Freeway Interchanges
This chapter summarizes an analysis of the need for freeway interchanges to accommodate new development. The chapter documents a reasonable relationship between new development and the impact fee for funding of these facilities.

Trip Demand
The need for freeway interchanges is based on the trip demand placed on the system by development. A reasonable measure of demand is the number of average daily vehicle trips.

Unlike the arterial streets fee and the traffic signal fee, trip demand for freeway interchanges is not adjusted by pass-by trips, or trip length. Table 13.1 shows the trip rates used in the analysis.

Table 13.1: Trip Generation Rates
ITE Category
Average
Daily
Trips
Residential - per Dwelling Unit
Single Family Single Family Housing (210) 9.43
Multifamily Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise) (220) 6.74
Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Regional Commercial Shopping Center (820) 37.01
General Commercial Shopping Center (820) 37.01
Office General Office Building (710) 10.84
Industrial General Light Industrial (110) 4.87
High Cube Warehouse High-Cube / Short-Term Storage Warehouse (154) 1.40 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition.

Trip Demand Growth
The planning horizon for this analysis is 2045. Table 13.2 lists the 2023 and 2045 land use assumptions used in this study. The trip rates identified in Table 13.1 are multiplied by the existing and future dwelling units and building square feet to determine the increase in trips caused by new development.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 70 Table 13.2: Land Use Scenario and Total Trips
Land Use Trip Rate
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Residential
Single Family 9.43 48,200 454,526 14,200 133,906 62,400 588,432 Multifamily 6.74 10,200 68,748 5,700 38,418 15,900 107,166 Subtotal 58,400 523,274 19,900 172,324 78,300 695,598
Nonresidential
Commercial 37.01 6,862 253,960 1,715 63,490 8,577 317,450 Office 10.84 4,006 43,429 994 10,771 5,000 54,200
Industrial 4.87 1,724 8,397 431 2,099 2,155 10,496
High Cube Warehouse 1.40 29,306 41,028 40,600 56,840 69,906 97,868 Subtotal 41,898 346,814 43,740 133,200 85,638 480,014
Total 870,088 305,524 1,175,612
74% 26% 100%
Sources: Tables 2.1 and 13.1; Willdan Financial Services 2023 Growth 2023 to 2045 Total - 2045
Project Costs
Cost estimates are summarized in Table 13.3. The City’s traffic engineers prepared the cost estimates, using cost estimating methodology consistent with the estimating methodology used in recent WRCOG’s Nexus Study. TUMF credits are identified in the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study (2021 Update).

Table 13.3: Interchange Improvement Costs
Interchange Location
Total Project
Cost
2021 TUMF Cost
Maximum Share City DIF Share
60/Day $ 19,286,000 $ 19,286,000 $ -
60/Perris 22,159,000 - 22,159,000
60/Redlands 70,000,000 39,934,000 30,066,000
60/WLC (Theodore) 118,000,000 21,970,000 96,030,000
60/Gilman Springs 100,785,000 - 100,785,000
215/Cactus 70,000,000 39,934,000 30,066,000
Studies/Misc. Improvements 6,000,000 - 6,000,000
Total $ 406,230,000 $ 121,124,000 $ 285,106,000
Sources: City of Moreno Valley; WRCOG TUMF 2021 Nexus Update.

Fee per Trip Demand Unit
Every impact fee consists of a dollar amount, or the cost of projects that can be funded by a fee, divided by a measure of development. In this case, all fees are first calculated as a cost per trip demand unit. Then these amounts are translated into housing unit (cost per unit) and employment J.1.d
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 71 space (cost per 1,000 square feet) by multiplying the cost per trip by the trip generation rate for each land use category. These amounts become the fee schedule.

Table 13.4 calculates the cost the cost per trip demand unit by dividing the total project costs attributable to new development summarized in Table 13.3, by the total growth in trips shown in Table 13.2.

Table 13.4: Cost per Trip to Accommodate Growth
Fee Program Share of Planned Facilities Costs $ 285,106,000 Less Existing Fund Balance 2,680,591
Net Facility Costs $ 282,425,409
Growth in Daily Trips 305,524
Cost per Trip $ 924
Sources: Tables 13.1 and 13.3.

Fee Schedule
Table 13.5 shows the maximum justified freeway interchanges facilities fee schedule. The fees are based on the costs per trip shown in Table 13.4. The cost per trip is multiplied by the trip demand factors in Table 13.1 to determine a fee per unit of new development. The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to all City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 72 Table 13.5: Interchange Improvements Impact Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Trip
Land Use
Cost Per
Trip
Demand
Factor Base Fee1
Admin
Charge1, 2 Total Fee1
Fee per
Sq. Ft.3
Residential Dwelling Unit 4$ 924 8.66 $ 8,002 $ 160 $ 8,162 $ 4.72 Nonresidential - per 1,000 Sq. Ft.

Regional Commercial $ 924 37.01 $ 34,197 $ 684 $ 34,881 $ 34.88 General Commercial 924 37.01 34,197 684 34,881 34.88
Office 924 10.84 10,016 200 10,216 10.22
Industrial 924 4.87 4,500 90 4,590 4.59
High Cube Warehouse 924 1.40 1,294 26 1,320 1.32
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 4 Average trip demand factor per residential dw elling unit w eighted by projected single family and multifamily development.

Sources: Tables 13.1 and 13.4; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 73 14. Animal Shelter Facilities
The purpose of the fee is to ensure that new development funds its fair share of animal shelter facilities. A fee schedule is presented based on the planned facilities standard of animal shelter facilities in the City of Moreno Valley to ensure that new development provides adequate funding to meet its needs.

Service Population
Animal shelter facilities primarily serve residents. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s residential service population. Table 14.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for animal shelter facilities.

Table 14.1: Animal Shelter Facilities
Service Population
Residents
Existing (2023) 207,700
New Development (2023-2045) 59,100
Total (2045) 266,800
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s animal shelter facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
This study uses the existing standard methodology to calculate fees for animal shelter facilities.

The City’s inventory of animal shelter facilities is displayed in Table 14.2. The City owns and operates one 16,000 square foot animal shelter. In all, the City owns approximately $4 million in animal shelter facilities.

Table 14.2: Animal Shelter Facilities Inventory
Amount Units Unit Cost Value
Animal Shelter - 14041 Elsworth Street
Land 2.83 Acres $ 374,000 $ 1,058,400
Animal Shelter Building 16,000 Sq. Ft. 185 2,953,200
Total $ 4,011,600
Sources: City of Moreno Valley; City of Moreno Valley Public Entity Risk Management Authority, Building Detail Report - 2009; Willdan Financial Services.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 74 Planned Facilities
Table 14.3 summarizes the planned facilities. The facilities will serve both existing and new development and are estimated to cost $7.5 million.

Table 14.3: Planned Animal Shelter Facilities
Total
Animal Services New Parcel Property Improvements $ 288,000 Animal Shelter Expansion - Phase 2 to 4 * 7,200,000
Net Cost of Planned Facilities $ 7,488,000
Source: City of Moreno Valley, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25.

Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” Table 14.4 expresses the City’s current recreation facilities level of service in terms of an existing cost per capita. This cost per capita is not used in the fee calculation, rather it is shown here for informational purposes only.

Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the cost per capita shown in Table 11.4. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City can fund the planned animal shelter facilities that have been identified and approved by the City Council in the City’s most recent CIP.

Table 14.4: Animal Shelter Facilities Existing Standard Value of Existing Facilities $ 4,011,600
Existing Fund Balance 21,697
Total $ 4,033,297
Existing Service Population 207,700
Cost per Capita $ 19
Facility Standard per Resident $ 19
Sources: Tables 14.1 and 14.2; Willdan Financial Services.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 75 Future Level of Service
Table 14.5 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in animal services facilities at the planning horizon. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the planning horizon. The value per capita is multiplied by the worker weighting factor of 0.31 to determine the value per worker.

Table 14.5: Animal Shelter Facilities System Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 4,011,600
Value of Planned Facilities 7,488,000
Total System Value (2045) $ 11,499,600
Future Service Population (2045) 266,800
Cost per Capita $ 43
Facility Standard per Resident $ 43
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.

Sources: Tables 14.1, 14.2 and 14.3.

Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use animal shelter facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, vehicles and equipment that are part of the system of animal shelter facilities serving new development.

Non-fee Funding Required
Completing the planned facilities will provide a higher value of facilities per capita than is currently provided in Moreno Valley. Impact fee revenue may not be used to increase the level of service provided to existing development. Therefore, impact fee revenue will not fully fund the planned animal shelter facilities and some non-fee funding will be required. Table 14.6 shows the projected fee revenue and the non-fee funding required through 2045. After accounting for the projected future impact fee revenue, approximately $4.9 million in non-fee funding will be needed to complete the planned corporation yard facilities.

The City will need to use alternative funding sources to fund existing development’s share of the planned corporation yard facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 76 Table 14.6: Revenue Projection – System Standard
Cost per Capita $ 43
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045) 59,100
Fee Revenue $ 2,541,000
Cost of Planned Facilities $ 7,488,000
Fee Revenue 2,541,000
Less Existing Fund Balance 21,697
Non-Fee Revenue to be Identified $ 4,925,303
Sources: Tables 14.1, 14.3 and 14.4.

Fee Schedule
Table 14.7 shows the maximum justified animal shelter fee schedule. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit densities (persons per dwelling unit). The fee per average sized dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

Table 14.7: Animal Shelter Facilities Impact Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 43 3.41 $ 147 $ 3 $ 150 $ 0.09 1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit.

Sources: Tables 2.2 and 14.5; Willdan Financial Services 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 77 15. Workforce Development
Facilities
The purpose of the workforce development facilities impact fee is to fund the workforce development facilities needed to serve new development. A maximum justified fee schedule is presented based on the system plan standard of workforce development facilities per capita.

Service Population
Workforce development facilities serve both residents and businesses. Therefore, demand for services and associated facilities are based on the City’s service population including residents and workers.

Table 15.1 shows the existing and future projected service population for workforce development facilities. Residents and employees are weighted equally since both groups are equally eligible to receive workforce development services from the City.

Table 15.1: Workforce development Facilities Service Population Residents1 Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2023) 134,700 52,000 186,700
New Development (2023-2045) 38,300 12,900 51,200
Total (2045) 173,000 64,900 237,900
Weighting Factor 1.00 1.00
1 Estimate of residents over the age of 18 and under 65 based on data from DOF and ACS.

Source: American Community Survey Table K200104, 2022; Table 2.1,Willdan Financial Services.

Facility Inventories and Standards
This section describes the City’s workforce development facility inventory and facility standards.

Existing Inventory
Table 15.2 summarizes the City’s current inventory of workforce development facilities. While the City currently operates a workforce development program, it leases building space and only owns some IT equipment. In total, the City owns $43,000 of workforce development facilities equipment.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 78 Table 15.2: Workforce Development Facilities Inventory Inventory Unit Cost Value
Equipment
Computers 42 $ 1,000 $ 42,000
Televisions 2 500 1,000
Subtotal 44 $ 43,000
Total Value of Existing Facilities $ 43,000
Sources: City of Moreno Valley.

Planned Facilities
Table 15.3 summarizes the planned facilities needed to serve the City through 2045, as identified by City’s workforce development program. The City plans to build a workforce development building and non-profit business incubator. The cost of this planned facility is $35 million, as indicated in the City’s most recent CIP.

Table 15.3: Planned Workforce Development Facilities
Cost
Buildings (square feet)
Workforce Development Building and Non-Profit Business
Incubator $ 35,000,000
Total Value of Planned Facilities $ 35,000,000
Source: City of Moreno Valley, Adopted Capital Improvement Plan, Fiscal Years 23-24 | 24-25.

Cost Allocation
Existing Level of Service
Per the new nexus study requirements that went into effect of January 1, 2022, a nexus study “shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.” The City’s existing level of service is de minimis since it does not own a workforce development facility.

Once the planned facilities have been constructed and new development has increased the City’s service population the resulting facility cost per capita will be higher than the negligible cost per capita that exists today. The increased facility standard is needed to ensure that the City can provide workforce development services to all eligible residents and employees in the City.

Future Level of Service
Table 15.4 shows new development’s projected per capita investment in workforce development facilities at the planning horizon. This level of service drives the fee calculation. This value is calculated by dividing cost of existing and planned facilities by the service population at the J.1.d
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 79 planning horizon. The value per capita is the same for residents of working age and people employed in the City, since both groups of people are equally eligible to use the City’s workforce development services.

Table 15.4: Workforce Development Facilities System
Standard
Value of Existing Facilities $ 43,000
Value of Planned Facilities 35,000,000
Total System Value (2045) $ 35,043,000
Future Service Population (2045) 237,900
Cost per Capita $ 147
Facility Standard per Resident $ 147
Facility Standard per Worker 147
Sources: Tables 15.1, 15.2 and 15.3.

Use of Fee Revenue
The City can use workforce development facilities fee revenues for the construction or purchase of buildings, land, vehicles, and workforce development equipment that are part of the system of workforce development facilities serving new development. A list of planned facilities is included in Table 15.3.

Non-Fee Funding Required
Completing the planned facilities will provide a higher value of facilities per capita than is currently provided in Moreno Valley. Impact fee revenue may not be used to increase the level of service provided to existing development. Therefore, impact fee revenue will not fully fund the planned workforce development facilities and some non-fee funding will be required. Table 15.5 shows the projected fee revenue and the non-fee funding required through 2045. After accounting for the projected future impact fee revenue, approximately $27.5 million in non-fee funding will be needed to complete the planned workforce development facilities. The City will need to use alternative funding sources to fund existing development’s share of the planned workforce development facilities. Potential sources of revenue include but are not limited to existing or new general fund revenues, existing or new taxes, special assessments, and grants.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 80 Table 15.5: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita $ 147
Growth in Service Population (2023 - 2045) 51,200
Fee Revenue $ 7,526,000
Cost of Planned Facilities $ 35,000,000
Fee Revenue 7,526,000
Less Existing Fund Balance 7,458
Non-Fee Revenue to be Identified $ 27,466,542
Sources: Tables 15.1, 15.3 and 15.4.

Fee Schedule
Table 15.6 shows the maximum justified workforce development facilities fee schedule. The City can adopt any fee up to this amount. The cost per capita is converted to a fee per unit of new development based on dwelling unit and employment densities (persons per dwelling unit or employees per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential building space). The fee per dwelling unit is converted into a fee per square foot by dividing the fee per dwelling unit by the assumed average square footage of a dwelling unit.

The total fee includes a two percent (2.0%) administrative charge to fund costs that include: a standard overhead charge applied to City programs for legal, accounting, and other departmental and administrative support, and fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting and mandated public reporting.

In Willdan’s experience with impact fee programs, two percent of the base fee adequately covers the cost of fee program administration. The administrative charge should be reviewed and adjusted during comprehensive impact fee updates to ensure that revenue generated from the charge sufficiently covers, but does not exceed, the administrative costs associated with the fee program.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 81 Table 15.6: Workforce Development Facilities Impact Fee Schedule A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D E / Average
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee1 Sq. Ft.3 Residential Dwelling Unit $ 147 2.46 $ 362 $ 7 $ 369 $ 0.21 Nonresidential
Commercial $ 147 2.39 $ 351 $ 7 $ 358 $ 0.36
Office 147 3.12 459 9 468 0.47
Industrial 147 1.16 171 3 174 0.17
High Cube Warehouse 147 0.72 106 2 108 0.11
1 Fee per average sized dw elling unit (residential) or per 1,000 square feet (nonresidential).

Sources: Tables 15.1 and 15.4.
2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
3 Assumes an average of 1,729 square feet per dw elling unit in the Riverside - San Bernardino MSA per the 2019 American Housing Survey.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 82 16. AB 602 Requirements
On January 1, 2022, new requirements went into effect for California jurisdictions implementing impact fees. Among other changes, AB 602 added Section 66016.5 to the Government Code, which set guidelines for impact fee nexus studies. Three key requirements from that section which concern the nexus study are reproduced here:
66016.5. (a) (2) When applicable, the nexus study shall identify the existing level of service for each public facility, identify the proposed new level of service, and include an explanation of why the new level of service is appropriate.
66016.5. (a) (4) If a nexus study supports the increase of an existing fee, the local agency shall review the assumptions of the nexus study supporting the original fee and evaluate the amount of fees collected under the original fee.
66016.5. (a) (6) Large jurisdictions shall adopt a capital improvement plan as a part of the nexus study.

Compliance with AB 602
The following sections describe this study’s compliance with the new requirements of AB 602. 66016.5. (a) (2) - Level of Service

1. For fees calculated under the existing standard methodology, the fees are calculated such that new development funds facilities at the existing level of service. These fee categories are: city hall and maintenance equipment facilities. The existing level service in terms of the existing facility investment per capita is shown in each corresponding chapter.

2. For fees calculated under the planned facilities methodology, the fees are calculated to ensure that the level of service does not fall to unacceptable levels. The fees calculated under this approach are the arterial streets fee, the traffic signals fee, and the interchange improvements fees. All projects included in these fees met the City’s congestion level of service standards of LOS C or LOS D at the time they were added to the impact fee program. Impact fees charged under this program will serve to ensure that the LOS does not fall below LOS D.

3. For the fees calculated under the system standard methodology, the maximum justified fees represent an increase in the facility level of service. The fees calculated under this methodology are the fire, police, parks, recreation center, library, corporation yard, animal shelter, and workforce development facilities fees. The increased level of service is required to fund new development’s fair share of facilities identified and approved by the City Council in the City’s most recent CIP. New development will not fund the entirety of the increase in level of service, rather, it will fund a share of the increased level of service represented by the planned facilities. The City will have to fund existing development’s share of the increase level of service through any other funding source. Each chapter for facility fee categories that are increasing the level of service include a table that shows the existing level of service and future level of service in terms of facility investment per capita.
66016.5. (a) (4) – Review of Original Fee Assumptions
Table 15.1 reviews the assumptions from the 2022 study in terms of the resulting fee revenue generated by each impact fee. The actual fee revenue collected from 2012 through 2024 is then J.1.d
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 83 listed. These figures are then compared to the projected fee revenue from this 2023 nexus study.

Note that the two studies use different planning horizons. The 2022 studies assessed impacts through 2040, and this 2023 study assesses the impacts through 2045.

Table 16.1: Review of 2022 Study
2022 Study Fee Revenue 2023 Study
Facility Category
Cost Allocated to New
Development1
Collected (2012
through Current)
Cost Allocated to New
Development2
Arterial Streets $ 333,809,510 $ 17,310,697 $ 250,933,188 Traffic Signals 25,095,738 4,422,148 46,987,376
Fire 21,447,000 7,962,386 42,962,800
Police 17,210,000 4,120,731 25,682,000
Park Fee / Quimby 102,737,574 7,640,379 227,853,300
Recreation Centers 9,540,000 2,254,208 25,254,000
Libraries 8,926,800 1,214,455 22,831,200
City Hall 9,635,000 1,649,715 9,970,000
Corporate Yard 13,756,000 4,325,481 35,841,000
Maintenance Equipment 4,121,000 1,211,429 4,228,000
Interchange Improvements 193,685,450 6,867,204 282,425,409 Animal Shelter 659,000 519,578 2,541,000
Workforce Development 6,696,000 - 7,526,000
Total $ 740,623,072 $ 59,498,411 $ 977,509,273
1 2021 through 2040.
2 2023 through 2045.

Sources: City of Moreno Valley; City of Moreno Valley 2022 Development Impact Fee Study Final Draft Report January 28, 2022; City of Moreno Valley Workforce Development Facilities and Public Art Impact Fee Nexus Study, September 16, 2022; Table E.2 Willdan Financial Services.
66016.5. (a) (6) – Capital Improvement Plan
The Capital Improvement Plan for this nexus study is comprised of the identified planned facilities within each facility fee chapter. Planned facilities identified in this document are sourced from the City’s current adopted CIP. Adoption of this nexus study would approve the planned facilities identified herein as the Capital Improvement Plan for this nexus study.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 84 17. Implementation
Impact Fee Program Adoption Process
Impact fee program adoption procedures are found in the California Government Code section 66016. Adoption of an impact fee program requires the City Council to follow certain procedures including holding a public hearing. Data, such as an impact fee report, must be made available at least 10 days prior to the public hearing. The City’s legal counsel should be consulted for any other procedural requirements as well as advice regarding adoption of an enabling ordinance and/or a resolution. After adoption there is a mandatory 60-day waiting period before the fees go into effect.

Inflation Adjustment
The City has kept its impact fee program up to date by periodically adjusting the fees for inflation.

Such adjustments should be completed regularly to ensure that new development will fully fund its share of needed facilities. We recommend that the following indices be used for adjusting fees for inflation:
 Buildings – Engineering News-Record’s Building Cost Index (BCI)  Equipment – Consumer Price Index, All Items, 1982-84=100 for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)
The indices recommended can be found for local jurisdictions (state, region), and for the nation.

With the exception of land, we recommend that the national indices be used to adjust for inflation, as the national indices are not subject to frequent dramatic fluctuations that the localized indices are subject to.

Due to the highly variable nature of land costs, there is no particular index that captures fluctuations in land values. We recommend that the City adjust land values based on recent land purchases, sales or appraisals at the time of the update.

While fee updates using inflation indices are appropriate for periodic updates to ensure that fee revenues keep up with increases in the costs of public facilities, the City will also need to conduct more extensive updates of the fee documentation and calculation (such as this study) when significant new data on growth forecasts and/or facility plans become available.

Reporting Requirements
The City complies with the annual and five-year reporting requirements of the Mitigation Fee Act.

For facilities to be funded by a combination of public fees and other revenues, identification of the source and amount of these non-fee revenues is essential. Identification of the timing of receipt of other revenues to fund the facilities is also important.

Programming Revenues and Projects with the CIP
The City maintains a five-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to plan for future infrastructure needs. The CIP identifies costs and phasing for specific capital projects. The use of the CIP in this manner documents a reasonable relationship between new development and the use of those revenues.

The City may decide to alter the scope of the planned projects or to substitute new projects as long as those new projects continue to represent an expansion of the City’s facilities. If the total J.1.d
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 85 cost of facilities varies from the total cost used as a basis for the fees, the City should consider revising the fees accordingly.

Reimbursements
For some facility categories, particularly park facilities, developers occasionally dedicate parkland and construct facilities in lieu of paying the development impact fee. If a developer builds parkland that exceeds the development’s share of needed facilities, that developer should be reimbursed for the amount of facilities created above and beyond that development’s impact.

However, we recommend that the City’ reimburse the difference based on a) the costs identified in the most recent CIP, and b) at the time that the City would be building the improvement had the development not occurred. By following these guidelines, the City will not be unfairly burdened with unanticipated costs.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND 86 18. Mitigation Fee Act Findings
Public facilities fees are one-time fees typically paid when a building permit is issued and imposed on development projects by local agencies responsible for regulating land use (cities and counties). To guide the widespread imposition of public facilities fees the State Legislature adopted the Mitigation Fee Act (the Act) with Assembly Bill 1600 in 1987 and subsequent amendments. The Act, contained in California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66025, establishes requirements on local agencies for the imposition and administration of fee programs.

The Act requires local agencies to document five findings when adopting a fee.

The five statutory findings required for adoption of the public facilities fees documented in this report are presented in this chapter and supported in detail by the preceding chapters. All statutory references are to the Act.

Purpose of Fee
 Identify the purpose of the fee (§66001(a)(1) of the Act).

Development impact fees are designed to ensure that new development will not burden the existing service population with the cost of facilities required to accommodate growth. The purpose of the fees proposed by this report is to provide a funding source from new development for capital improvements to serve that development. The fees advance a legitimate City interest by enabling the City to provide public facilities to new development.

Use of Fee Revenues
 Identify the use to which the fees will be put. If the use is financing facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan as specified in §65403 or §66002, may be made in applicable general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify the facilities for which the fees are charged (§66001(a)(2) of the Act).

Fees proposed in this report, if enacted by the City, would be used to fund expanded facilities to serve new development. Facilities funded by these fees are designated to be located within the City’s sphere of influence. Fees addressed in this report have been identified by the City to be restricted to funding the following facility categories: arterial streets, traffic signals, fire facilities, police facilities, parks, library facilities, recreation facilities, city hall facilities, corporation yard facilities, maintenance equipment facilities freeway interchanges, animal shelter and workforce development facilities.

Benefit Relationship
 Determine the reasonable relationship between the fees' use and the type of development project on which the fees are imposed (§66001(a)(3) of the Act).

The City will restrict fee revenue to the acquisition of land, construction of facilities and buildings, and purchase of related equipment, furnishings, vehicles, and services used to serve new development. Facilities funded by the fees are expected to provide a citywide network of facilities accessible to the additional residents and workers associated with new development. Under the Act, fees are not intended to fund planned facilities needed to correct existing deficiencies. Thus, a reasonable relationship can be shown between the use of fee revenue and the new development residential and non-residential use classifications that will pay the fees.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Update 87 Burden Relationship
 Determine the reasonable relationship between the need for the public facilities and the types of development on which the fees are imposed (§66001(a)(4) of the Act).

Facilities need is based on a facility standard that represents the demand generated by new development for those facilities. For each facility category, demand is measured by a single facility standard that can be applied across land use types to ensure a reasonable relationship to the type of development. For most facility categories service population standards are calculated based upon the number of residents associated with residential development and the number of workers associated with non-residential development. To calculate a single, per capita standard, one worker is weighted less than one resident based on an analysis of the relative use demand between residential and non-residential development.

The standards used to identify growth needs are also used to determine if planned facilities will partially serve the existing service population by correcting existing deficiencies. This approach ensures that new development will only be responsible for its fair share of planned facilities, and that the fees will not unfairly burden new development with the cost of facilities associated with serving the existing service population.

Chapter 2, Growth Forecasts provides a description of how service population and growth forecasts are calculated. Facility standards are described in the Facility Standards sections of each facility category chapter.

Proportionality
 Determine how there is a reasonable relationship between the fees amount and the cost of the facilities or portion of the facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed (§66001(b) of the Act).

The reasonable relationship between each facilities fee for a specific new development project and the cost of the facilities attributable to that project is based on the estimated new development growth the project will accommodate. Fees for a specific project are based on the project’s size. Larger new development projects can result in a higher service population resulting in higher fee revenue than smaller projects in the same land use classification. Thus, the fees ensure a reasonable relationship between a specific new development project and the cost of the facilities attributable to that project.

See Chapter 2, Growth Forecasts and Unit Costs, or the Service Population sections in each facility category chapter for a description of how service populations or other factors are determined for different types of land uses. See the Fee Schedule section of each facility category chapter for a presentation of the proposed facilities fees.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND A
-1
Appendix
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-2
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs
Dir Street Name From To
New
ROW Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/ Median)
Planning
Cost (5% Of
Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering
Cost (25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering
And Admin.

Cost (10% Of
Construction
Cost) Total Cost

EAST - WEST ARTERIALS
EB Alessandro Bl I-215 Day St $ - $ 27,495 $ 1,375 $ 6,874 $ 2,750 $ 38,493 WB Alessandro Bl I-215 Day St 674,016 703,415 35,171 175,854 70,342 1,658,797 WB Alessandro Bl Day St Grant St 691,362 693,315 34,666 173,329 69,332 1,662,003 EB Alessandro Bl Frederick St Chagall Ct 510,468 511,910 25,596 127,978 51,191 1,227,142 EB Alessandro Bl Chagall Ct Graham St 654,192 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,572,648 EB Alessandro Bl Graham St Alessandro Plaza 334,530 335,475 16,774 83,869 33,548 804,195 EB Alessandro Bl Alessandro Plaza Heacock St 652,210 654,052 32,703 163,513 65,405 1,567,882 EB Alessandro Bl Heacock St 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St - 37,674 1,884 9,419 3,767 52,744 WB Alessandro Bl Heacock St 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St - 37,674 1,884 9,419 3,767 52,744 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St Indian St - 37,674 1,884 9,419 3,767 52,744 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St Indian St - 37,674 1,884 9,419 3,767 52,744 EB Alessandro Bl Perris Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl 421,260 459,305 22,965 114,826 45,931 1,064,287 WB Alessandro Bl Perris Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl - 36,855 1,843 9,214 3,686 51,597 EB Alessandro Bl Kitching St 1/4 mi E. of Kitching St 584,808 802,920 40,146 200,730 80,292 1,708,896 WB Alessandro Bl Kitching St 1/4 mi E. of Kitching St 500,556 698,370 34,919 174,593 69,837 1,478,274 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Kitching St Lasselle St 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Kitching St Lasselle St 52,150 535,395 26,770 133,849 53,540 801,703 EB Alessandro Bl Lasselle St 1/4 mi E. of Lasselle St 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl Lasselle St 1/4 mi E. of Lasselle St 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Lasselle St Morrison St 92,400 811,800 40,590 202,950 81,180 1,228,920 EB Alessandro Bl Morrison St 1/4 mi E. of Morrison St 81,480 755,640 37,782 188,910 75,564 1,139,376 WB Alessandro Bl Morrison St 1/4 mi E. of Morrison St 48,300 464,130 23,207 116,033 46,413 698,082 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Morrison St Nason St 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Morrison St Nason St 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 WB Alessandro Bl Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Nason St Oliver St 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Nason St Oliver St 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 EB Alessandro Bl Oliver St 1/4 mi E. of Oliver St 45,500 400,270 20,014 100,068 40,027 605,878 WB Alessandro Bl Oliver St 1/4 mi E. of Oliver St 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Oliver St Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Oliver St Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 EB Alessandro Bl Moreno Beach Drive 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 WB Alessandro Bl Moreno Beach Drive 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 1/2 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 1/2 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 EB Alessandro Bl 1/2 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive Wilmot St 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 WB Alessandro Bl 1/2 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive Wilmot St 92,400 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,118,964 EB Alessandro Bl Wilmot St Redlands Bl 312,312 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,338,876 WB Alessandro Bl Wilmot St Redlands Bl 312,312 733,260 36,663 183,315 73,326 1,338,876 EB Alessandro Bl Merwin St Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl Merwin St Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl Sinclair St 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl Sinclair St 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl World Logistics Center Pkwy 1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl World Logistics Center Pkwy 1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 J.1.d
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-3
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs Continued
Dir Street Name From To
New
ROW Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/ Median)
Planning
Cost (5% Of
Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering
Cost (25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering
And Admin.

Cost (10% Of
Construction
Cost) Total Cost
WB Alessandro Bl 3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 1 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 1-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 1-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 1-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 1-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 WB Alessandro Bl 1-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 92,400 889,020 44,451 222,255 88,902 1,337,028 EB Alessandro Bl 2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl 2-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 2-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl 2-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 2-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 2-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl 2-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 2-3/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl 3 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 3 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3-1/4 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl 3-1/4mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 3-1/4mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy 3-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Alessandro Bl 3-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy Gilman Springs Rd - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Alessandro Bl 3-1/2 mi E. of World Logistics Center Pkwy Gilman Springs Rd - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Box Springs Rd 1/4 mi E. of Morton Rd Clark St 230,454 231,105 11,555 57,776 23,111 554,001 EB Box Springs Rd Clark St 1/4 mi E. of Clark St 46,900 332,990 16,650 83,248 33,299 513,086 EB Cactus Av W. City boundary Commerce Dr 124,740 989,901 49,495 247,475 98,990 1,510,601 WB Cactus Av W. City boundary Commerce Dr 124,740 989,901 49,495 247,475 98,990 1,510,601 EB Cactus Av Commerce Dr Elsworth St - 32,877 1,644 8,219 3,288 46,028 WB Cactus Av Commerce Dr Elsworth St 87,920 657,109 32,855 164,277 65,711 1,007,873 EB Cactus Av Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 222,404 467,180 23,359 116,795 46,718 876,456 WB Cactus Av Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cactus Av 1/4 mi E. of Nason St Oliver St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cactus Av Moreno Beach Drive 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cactus Av Quincy St Wilmot St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 WB Cactus Av Wilmot St Redlands Bl 92,400 881,760 44,088 220,440 88,176 1,326,864 EB Cottonwood Av W. City Boundary Edgemont St 212,940 447,300 22,365 111,825 44,730 839,160 WB Cottonwood Av W. City Boundary Edgemont St 212,940 447,300 22,365 111,825 44,730 839,160 EB Cottonwood Av Edgemont St Day St 327,691 688,345 34,417 172,086 68,835 1,291,374 WB Cottonwood Av Edgemont St Day St 327,691 688,345 34,417 172,086 68,835 1,291,374 EB Cottonwood Av Day St 1/4 mi E. of Day St 314,915 661,507 33,075 165,377 66,151 1,241,024 WB Cottonwood Av Day St 1/4 mi E. of Day St 314,915 661,507 33,075 165,377 66,151 1,241,024 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Day St Elsworth St 314,915 661,507 33,075 165,377 66,151 1,241,024 WB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Day St Elsworth St 314,915 661,507 33,075 165,377 66,151 1,241,024 EB Cottonwood Av Elsworth St 1/4 mi E. of Elsworth St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cottonwood Av Elsworth St 1/4 mi E. of Elsworth St 307,580 646,100 32,305 161,525 64,610 1,212,120 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Elsworth St Frederick St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Elsworth St Frederick St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 EB Cottonwood Av Frederick St 1/4 mi E. of Frederick St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cottonwood Av Frederick St 1/4 mi E. of Frederick St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Frederick St Graham St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Frederick St Graham St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 EB Cottonwood Av Graham St 1/4 mi E. of Graham St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cottonwood Av Graham St 1/4 mi E. of Graham St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Graham St Heacock St 357,266 750,470 37,524 187,618 75,047 1,407,924 J.1.d
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-4
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs Continued
Dir Street Name From To
New
ROW Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/ Median)
Planning
Cost (5% Of
Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering
Cost (25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering
And Admin.

Cost (10% Of
Construction
Cost) Total Cost
WB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Graham St Heacock St 357,266 750,470 37,524 187,618 75,047 1,407,924 EB Cottonwood Av Perris Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl 156,156 328,020 16,401 82,005 32,802 615,384 WB Cottonwood Av Perris Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl Kitching St 44,954 94,430 4,722 23,608 9,443 177,156 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Kitching St Lasselle St 158,522 332,990 16,650 83,248 33,299 624,708 EB Cottonwood Av Lasselle St 1/4 mi E. of Lasselle St 158,522 332,990 16,650 83,248 33,299 624,708 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Lasselle St Morrison St 158,522 332,990 16,650 83,248 33,299 624,708 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Morrison St Nason St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 EB Cottonwood Av Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 WB Cottonwood Av Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 312,312 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,230,768 EB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 1/2 mi E. of Nason St 45,500 323,050 16,153 80,763 32,305 497,770 WB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 1/2 mi E. of Nason St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Cottonwood Av 1/2 mi E. of Nason St Oliver St 212,940 447,300 22,365 111,825 44,730 839,160 WB Cottonwood Av 1/2 mi E. of Nason St Oliver St 212,940 447,300 22,365 111,825 44,730 839,160 EB Cottonwood Av Oliver St 665 ft E. of Oliver 157,339 408,975 20,449 102,244 40,898 729,904 WB Cottonwood Av Oliver St 665 ft E. of Oliver 157,339 408,975 20,449 102,244 40,898 729,904 EB Cottonwood Av 550 ft E. of Oliver St Moreno Beach Drive 307,580 646,100 32,305 161,525 64,610 1,212,120 WB Cottonwood Av 550 ft E. of Oliver St Moreno Beach Drive 307,580 646,100 32,305 161,525 64,610 1,212,120 WB Cottonwood Av Moreno Beach Drive 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 WB Cottonwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Drive Quincy St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Cottonwood Av Quincy St Wilmot St 50,400 357,840 17,892 89,460 35,784 551,376 EB Encelia Av Moreno Beach Dr 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Dr 92,400 811,800 40,590 202,950 81,180 1,228,920 WB Encelia Av Moreno Beach Dr 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Dr 92,400 811,800 40,590 202,950 81,180 1,228,920 EB Encelia Av 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Dr Quincy St 96,250 845,625 42,281 211,406 84,563 1,280,125 WB Encelia Av 1/4 mi E. of Moreno Beach Dr Quincy St 96,250 845,625 42,281 211,406 84,563 1,280,125 EB Encelia Av Quincy St Mozart Wy 93,100 817,950 40,898 204,488 81,795 1,238,230 WB Encelia Av Quincy St Mozart Wy 93,100 817,950 40,898 204,488 81,795 1,238,230 EB Encelia Av Mozart Wy Redlands Bl 11,154 811,800 40,590 202,950 81,180 1,147,674 WB Encelia Av Mozart Wy Redlands Bl 92,400 811,800 40,590 202,950 81,180 1,228,920 EB Eucalyptus Av W. City Boundary Old Hwy 215 64,750 513,779 25,689 128,445 51,378 784,041 WB Eucalyptus Av W. City Boundary Old Hwy 215 28,000 252,854 12,643 63,214 25,285 381,996 EB Eucalyptus Av Old Hwy 215 Edgemont St 6,126 360,325 18,016 90,081 36,033 510,581 WB Eucalyptus Av Old Hwy 215 Edgemont St 6,126 360,325 18,016 90,081 36,033 510,581 EB Eucalyptus Av Edgemont St Day St 685,910 749,858 37,493 187,465 74,986 1,735,712 WB Eucalyptus Av Edgemont St Day St 685,910 749,858 37,493 187,465 74,986 1,735,712 EB Eucalyptus Av Day St Arbor Park Ln 9,929 583,975 29,199 145,994 58,398 827,494 WB Eucalyptus Av Day St Arbor Park Ln 581,339 582,981 29,149 145,745 58,298 1,397,512 EB Eucalyptus Av Arbor Park Ln Towngate Bl 8,796 517,377 25,869 129,344 51,738 733,124 WB Eucalyptus Av Arbor Park Ln Towngate Bl 515,920 517,377 25,869 129,344 51,738 1,240,247 EB Eucalyptus Av Heacock St 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St 11,162 656,537 32,827 164,134 65,654 930,314 WB Eucalyptus Av Heacock St 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St 11,162 656,537 32,827 164,134 65,654 930,314 EB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St Indian St 11,162 656,537 32,827 164,134 65,654 930,314 WB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Heacock St Indian St 11,162 656,537 32,827 164,134 65,654 930,314 EB Eucalyptus Av Indian St 1/4 mi E. of Indian St 11,154 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 929,610 WB Eucalyptus Av Indian St 1/4 mi E. of Indian St 11,154 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 929,610 EB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Indian St Perris Bl 9,042 531,790 26,590 132,948 53,179 753,548 WB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Indian St Perris Bl 9,042 531,790 26,590 132,948 53,179 753,548 EB Eucalyptus Av Perris Bl 1/8 mi E. of Perris Bl 5,577 328,020 16,401 82,005 32,802 464,805 EB Eucalyptus Av 1/8 mi E. of Perris Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl 5,577 328,020 16,401 82,005 32,802 464,805 EB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl 3/8 mi E. of Perris Bl 5,577 328,020 16,401 82,005 32,802 464,805 EB Eucalyptus Av 3/8 mi E. of Perris Bl Kitching St 5,366 315,595 15,780 78,899 31,560 447,199 EB Eucalyptus Av Redlands Bl 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Eucalyptus Av Redlands Bl 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 J.1.d
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-5
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs Continued
Dir Street Name From To
New
ROW Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/ Median)
Planning
Cost (5% Of
Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering
Cost (25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering
And Admin.

Cost (10% Of
Construction
Cost) Total Cost WB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Eucalyptus Av Sinclair St 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Eucalyptus Av Sinclair St 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St Theodore St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 WB Eucalyptus Av 1/4 mi E. of Sinclair St Theodore St - 77,220 3,861 19,305 7,722 108,108 EB Eucalyptus Av 1/2 mi E. of Virginia St Gilman Springs Rd 310,800 2,730,600 136,530 682,650 273,060 4,133,640 WB Eucalyptus Av 1/2 mi E. of Virginia St Gilman Springs Rd 310,800 2,730,600 136,530 682,650 273,060 4,133,640 EB Gentian Av Heacock Av Canyon Stone Dr 78,470 557,137 27,857 139,284 55,714 858,462 EB Gentian Av Canyon Stone Dr Indian St 11,620 82,502 4,125 20,626 8,250 127,123 EB Iris Av Indian St Emma Ln 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Iris Av Emma Ln Perris Blvd 23,240 165,004 8,250 41,251 16,500 254,246 WB Ironwood Av Slawson Av Lasselle St 3,760 221,165 11,058 55,291 22,117 313,391 WB Ironwood Av Lasselle St Vista De Cerros Dr 10,013 588,945 29,447 147,236 58,895 834,536 EB Ironwood Av Vista De Cerros Dr 1/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 9,295 734,800 36,740 183,700 73,480 1,038,015 WB Ironwood Av Vista De Cerros Dr 1/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 9,295 734,800 36,740 183,700 73,480 1,038,015 EB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 1/2 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 11,154 881,760 44,088 220,440 88,176 1,245,618 WB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 1/2 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 11,154 881,760 44,088 220,440 88,176 1,245,618 EB Ironwood Av 1/2 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 3/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 11,154 881,760 44,088 220,440 88,176 1,245,618 WB Ironwood Av 1/2 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 3/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr 11,154 881,760 44,088 220,440 88,176 1,245,618 EB Ironwood Av 3/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr Nason St 49,000 347,900 17,395 86,975 34,790 536,060 WB Ironwood Av 3/4 mi E. of Vista De Cerros Dr Nason St 49,000 347,900 17,395 86,975 34,790 536,060 EB Ironwood Av Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 11,154 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 929,610 WB Ironwood Av Nason St 1/4 mi E. of Nason St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Nason St Oliver St 11,154 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 929,610 WB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Nason St Oliver St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Ironwood Av Oliver St Moreno Beach Drive 92,820 659,022 32,951 164,756 65,902 1,015,451 WB Ironwood Av Oliver St Moreno Beach Drive 92,820 659,022 32,951 164,756 65,902 1,015,451 EB Ironwood Av Moreno Beach Drive Petit St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 WB Ironwood Av Moreno Beach Drive Petit St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 WB Ironwood Av Petit St 1/4 mi E. of Petit St 46,200 328,020 16,401 82,005 32,802 505,428 EB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Petit St Quincy St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 WB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Petit St Quincy St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Ironwood Av Quincy St 1/4 mi E. of Quincy St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 WB Ironwood Av Quincy St 1/4 mi E. of Quincy St 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Quincy St Redlands Bl 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 WB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Quincy St Redlands Bl 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Ironwood Av Redlands Bl 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl 46,200 328,020 16,401 82,005 32,802 505,428 WB Ironwood Av Redlands Bl 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl 1/2 mi E. of Redlands Bl 46,200 328,020 16,401 82,005 32,802 505,428 WB Ironwood Av 1/4 mi E. of Redlands Bl 1/2 mi E. of Redlands Bl 92,400 656,040 32,802 164,010 65,604 1,010,856 EB Ironwood Av 1/2 mi E. of Redlands Bl Highland Bl 105,000 745,500 37,275 186,375 74,550 1,148,700 WB Ironwood Av 1/2 mi E. of Redlands Bl Highland Bl 105,000 745,500 37,275 186,375 74,550 1,148,700 EB Ironwood Av Highland Bl Theodore St 91,000 646,100 32,305 161,525 64,610 995,540 WB Ironwood Av Highland Bl Theodore St 91,000 646,100 32,305 161,525 64,610 995,540 EB John F Kennedy Dr Heacock St Pepper Ct 9,413 553,658 27,683 138,415 55,366 784,535 EB John F Kennedy Dr Pepper Ct Indian St 1,563 91,945 4,597 22,986 9,195 130,286 EB Krameria Av Emma Ln Perris Blvd 92,400 748,440 37,422 187,110 74,844 1,140,216 EB Nandina Av Indian St Perris Blvd 186,200 1,508,220 75,411 377,055 150,822 2,297,708 EB Reche Canyon Rd Moreno Beach Drive 1/4 mi W. of Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 748,440 37,422 187,110 74,844 1,140,216 WB Reche Canyon Rd Moreno Beach Drive 1/4 mi W. of Moreno Beach Drive 92,400 748,440 37,422 187,110 74,844 1,140,216 EB Reche Canyon Rd 1/4 mi W. of Moreno Beach Drive N. City Boundary 201,600 1,632,960 81,648 408,240 163,296 2,487,744 WB Reche Canyon Rd 1/4 mi W. of Moreno Beach Drive N. City Boundary 201,600 1,632,960 81,648 408,240 163,296 2,487,744 WB San Michelle Av Indian St Perris Blvd 97,300 788,130 39,407 197,033 78,813 1,200,682 EB Sunnymead Bl Perris Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl 662,617 1,327,106 66,355 331,777 132,711 2,520,566 WB Sunnymead Bl Perris Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl 662,617 1,327,106 66,355 331,777 132,711 2,520,566 EB Sunnymead Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl Kitching St 662,617 1,327,106 66,355 331,777 132,711 2,520,566 WB Sunnymead Bl 1/4 mi E. of Perris Bl Kitching St 662,617 1,327,106 66,355 331,777 132,711 2,520,566 Total - East - West Arterials $ 212,631,190
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-6
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs Continued
Dir Street Name From To
New ROW
Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/
Median)
Planning Cost (5%
Of Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering Cost
(25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering And
Admin. Cost (10% Of
Construction Cost) Total Cost

NORTH - SOUTH ARTERIALS
SB Day St Old 215 Frontage Rd 820' N/O Old 215 Frontage Rd 406,392 407,540 40,754 101,885 40,754 $ 997,325 SB Day St 820' N/O Old 215 Frontage Rd Alessandro Blvd 530,292 531,790 53,179 132,948 53,179 1,301,388 NB Day St Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 SB Day St Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 NB Day St Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 SB Day St Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 NB Day St Eucalyptus Av Gateway Dr. - 38,259 3,826 9,565 3,826 55,476 SB Day St Eucalyptus Av Gateway Dr. - 38,259 3,826 9,565 3,826 55,476 NB Day St EB SR 60 Fwy On/Off Ramps WB SR 60 Fwy On/Off Ramps - 56,160 5,616 14,040 5,616 81,432 SB Day St EB SR 60 Fwy On/Off Ramps WB SR 60 Fwy On/Off Ramps - 56,160 5,616 14,040 5,616 81,432 SB Elsworth St Bay Av Cottonwood Av 343,070 720,650 72,065 180,163 72,065 1,388,013 NB Gilman Spring Rd EB SR60 Fwy On/Off Ramps Eucalyptus Av 52,500 461,250 46,125 115,313 46,125 721,313 SB Gilman Spring Rd EB SR60 Fwy On/ogg Ramps Eucalyptus Av 52,500 461,250 46,125 115,313 46,125 721,313 NB Gilman Spring Rd Eucalyptus Av Virginia St 129,500 1,137,750 113,775 284,438 113,775 1,779,238 SB Gilman Spring Rd Eucalyptus Av Virginia St 129,500 1,137,750 113,775 284,438 113,775 1,779,238 NB Gilman Spring Rd Virginia St 160 FT N. of Kevin Rd 175,000 1,537,500 153,750 384,375 153,750 2,404,375 SB Gilman Spring Rd Virginia St 160 FT N. of Kevin Rd 175,000 1,537,500 153,750 384,375 153,750 2,404,375 NB Gilman Spring Rd 160 FT N. of Kevin Rd S. City Limits 1,591,800 13,985,100 1,398,510 3,496,275 1,398,510 21,870,195 SB Gilman Spring Rd 160 FT N. of Kevin Rd S. City Limits 1,591,800 13,985,100 1,398,510 3,496,275 1,398,510 21,870,195 SB Graham St Cactus Av Alessandro Blvd 74,200 526,820 52,682 131,705 52,682 838,089 NB Graham St Sunnymead Av Hemlock Av 324,142 680,890 68,089 170,223 68,089 1,311,433 SB Graham St Sunnymead Av Hemlock Av 324,142 680,890 68,089 170,223 68,089 1,311,433 NB Graham St Hemlock Ave Ironwood Av 340,231 714,686 71,469 178,672 71,469 1,376,526 SB Graham St Hemlock Ave Ironwood Av 177,450 372,750 37,275 93,188 37,275 717,938 NB Heacock St Harley Knox Blvd San Michelle Rd 291,900 2,072,490 207,249 518,123 207,249 3,297,011 SB Heacock St Harley Knox Blvd San Michelle Rd 291,900 2,072,490 207,249 518,123 207,249 3,297,011 NB Heacock St Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av 87,542 183,890 18,389 45,973 18,389 354,183 NB Heacock St Eucalyptus Av Fir Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 NB Heacock St Ironwood Av Gregory Ln 160,888 337,960 33,796 84,490 33,796 650,930 SB Heacock St Lake Summit Dr Meander Ct 414,050 869,750 86,975 217,438 86,975 1,675,188 NB Heacock St Meander Ct Reche Vista Rd 158,995 333,984 33,398 83,496 33,398 643,272 SB Heacock St Meander Ct Reche Vista Rd 483,847 1,016,365 101,637 254,091 101,637 1,957,576 NB Indian St. Harley Knox Bl Nandina St. 149,800 1,063,580 106,358 265,895 106,358 1,691,991 SB Indian St. Harley Knox Bl Nandina St. 170,590 1,211,189 121,119 302,797 121,119 1,926,814 NB Indian St. Nandina St. San Michele Rd 88,900 631,190 63,119 157,798 63,119 1,004,126 SB Indian St. Nandina St. San Michele Rd 88,900 631,190 63,119 157,798 63,119 1,004,126 NB Indian St. San Michele Rd Superior Av 63,700 452,270 45,227 113,068 45,227 719,492 SB Indian St. San Michele Rd Superior Av 151,340 1,074,514 107,451 268,629 107,451 1,709,385 NB Indian St. Superior Av Krameria Av 76,895 161,525 16,153 40,381 16,153 311,106 SB Indian St. Superior Av Krameria Av 438,656 921,438 92,144 230,360 92,144 1,774,742 NB Indian St. Krameria Av Goya Av 65,240 463,204 46,320 115,801 46,320 736,886 SB Indian St. Krameria Av Goya Av 92,400 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,043,658 NB Indian St. Goya Av Iris Av 93,940 666,974 66,697 166,744 66,697 1,061,052 SB Indian St. Goya Av Iris Av 93,940 666,974 66,697 166,744 66,697 1,061,052 NB Indian St. Wildwood St Gentian Av 89,180 633,178 63,318 158,295 63,318 1,007,288 NB Indian St. Gentian Av Filaree Av 156,156 328,020 32,802 82,005 32,802 631,785 NB Indian St. Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av 203,476 427,420 42,742 106,855 42,742 823,235 SB Indian St. Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av 165,620 347,900 34,790 86,975 34,790 670,075 NB Indian St. Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 SB Indian St. Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 NB Indian St. Eucalyptus Av Fir Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 SB Indian St. Eucalyptus Av Fir Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 NB Indian St. Fir Av Sunnymead Blvd 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 SB Indian St. Fir Av Sunnymead Blvd 153,790 323,050 32,305 80,763 32,305 622,213 NB Indian St. Sunnymead Blvd Hemlock Av 654,192 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,605,450 SB Indian St. Sunnymead Blvd Hemlock Av 654,192 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,605,450 NB Indian St. Hemlock Av Ironwood Av 334,552 702,758 70,276 175,690 70,276 1,353,552 SB Indian St. Hemlock Av Ironwood Av 334,552 702,758 70,276 175,690 70,276 1,353,552 J.1.d
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-7
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs Continued
Dir Street Name From To
New ROW
Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/
Median)
Planning Cost (5%
Of Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering Cost
(25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering And
Admin. Cost (10% Of
Construction Cost) Total Cost
NB Indian St. Ironwood Av Treasure Dr 192,829 405,055 40,506 101,264 40,506 $ 780,159 SB Indian St. Ironwood Av Treasure Dr 117,117 246,015 24,602 61,504 24,602 473,839 SB Indian St. Sundial Wy Sunnyridge Dr 175,557 368,774 36,877 92,194 36,877 710,280 NB Kitching St Harley Knox Bl Globe St 97,650 693,315 69,332 173,329 69,332 1,102,957 NB Kitching St Globe St Nandina Av 92,400 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,043,658 SB Kitching St Globe St Nandina Av 46,200 328,020 32,802 82,005 32,802 521,829 NB Kitching St Nandina Av Mariposa Av 624,624 1,312,080 131,208 328,020 131,208 2,527,140 SB Kitching St Nandina Av Mariposa Av 624,624 1,312,080 131,208 328,020 131,208 2,527,140 NB Kitching St Mariposa Av Krameria Av 89,435 187,866 18,787 46,967 18,787 361,841 SB Kitching St Iris Av Gentian Av 624,151 1,311,086 131,109 327,772 131,109 2,525,226 SB Kitching St Gentian Av Margaret Av 350,641 736,554 73,655 184,139 73,655 1,418,645 SB Kitching St Margaret Av John F Kennedy Dr 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 SB Kitching St John F Kennedy Dr Delphinium Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 SB Kitching St Delphinium Av Cactus Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 SB Kitching St Eucalyptus Av Fir Av 165,620 347,900 34,790 86,975 34,790 670,075 SB Kitching St Fir Av Sunnymead Bl 153,790 323,050 32,305 80,763 32,305 622,213 NB Lasselle St Alessandro Blvd Timo St 46,900 332,990 33,299 83,248 33,299 529,736 SB Lasselle St Alessandro Blvd Timo St 158,522 332,990 33,299 83,248 33,299 641,358 NB Lasselle St Timo St Bay Av 45,500 323,050 32,305 80,763 32,305 513,923 NB Lasselle St Bay Av Cottonwood Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 SB Lasselle St Bay Av Cottonwood Av 312,312 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,263,570 NB Lasselle St Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av 235,654 495,012 49,501 123,753 49,501 953,421 SB Lasselle St Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av 235,654 495,012 49,501 123,753 49,501 953,421 NB Moreno Beach Dr Cactus Av Brodiaea Av 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 NB Moreno Beach Dr Brodiaea Av Alessandro Bl 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 SB Moreno Beach Dr Brodiaea Av Alessandro Bl 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 NB Moreno Beach Dr Alessandro Bl Bay Av 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 SB Moreno Beach Dr Alessandro Bl Bay Av 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 NB Moreno Beach Dr Bay Av Cottonwood Av 101,500 891,750 89,175 222,938 89,175 1,394,538 SB Moreno Beach Dr Bay Av Cottonwood Av 101,500 891,750 89,175 222,938 89,175 1,394,538 NB Moreno Beach Dr Cottonwood Av 1/4m N Cottonwood Av 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 SB Moreno Beach Dr Cottonwood Av 1/4m N Cottonwood Av 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 NB Moreno Beach Dr 1/4m N Cottonwood Av 1/2m N Cottonwood Av 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 SB Moreno Beach Dr 1/4m N Cottonwood Av 1/2m N Cottonwood Av 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 NB Moreno Beach Dr Eucalyptus Av 1/4m N Eucalyptus Av 184,800 1,312,080 131,208 328,020 131,208 2,087,316 SB Moreno Beach Dr Eucalyptus Av 1/4m N Eucalyptus Av 184,800 1,312,080 131,208 328,020 131,208 2,087,316 NB Moreno Beach Dr 1/4m N Eucalyptus Av 1/2m N Eucalyptus Av 92,400 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,043,658 SB Moreno Beach Dr 1/4m N Eucalyptus Av 1/2m N Eucalyptus Av 92,400 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,043,658 NB Moreno Beach Dr 1/2m N Eucalyptus Av Ironwood Av 46,200 328,020 32,802 82,005 32,802 521,829 SB Moreno Beach Dr 1/2m N Eucalyptus Av Ironwood Av 46,200 328,020 32,802 82,005 32,802 521,829 NB Moreno Beach Dr Ironwood Av Juniper Av 92,610 657,531 65,753 164,383 65,753 1,046,030 SB Moreno Beach Dr Ironwood Av Juniper Av 92,610 657,531 65,753 164,383 65,753 1,046,030 SB Moreno Beach Dr Juniper Av Kalmia Av 92,540 657,034 65,703 164,259 65,703 1,045,239 NB Moreno Beach Dr Kalmia Av Locust Av 92,610 685,860 68,586 171,465 68,586 1,087,107 SB Moreno Beach Dr Kalmia Av Locust Av 92,610 685,860 68,586 171,465 68,586 1,087,107 NB Morrison St Cactus Av Brodiaea Av 96,600 784,740 78,474 196,185 78,474 1,234,473 SB Morrison St Cactus Av Brodiaea Av 96,600 784,740 78,474 196,185 78,474 1,234,473 NB Morrison St Brodiaea Av Alessandro Blvd - 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,177,110 SB Morrison St Brodiaea Av Alessandro Blvd - 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,177,110 NB Morrison St Alessandro Blvd Bay Av 89,320 - - - - 89,320 SB Morrison St Alessandro Blvd Bay Av 89,320 - - - - 89,320 NB Morrison St Bay Av Cottonwood Av 92,400 - - - - 92,400 SB Morrison St Bay Av Cottonwood Av 92,400 - - - - 92,400 SB Nason St SR-60fwy WB Exit Ironwood Av 108,500 770,350 77,035 192,588 77,035 1,225,508 SB Oliver St Iris Ave 1/4m N. Iris Ave 92,400 811,800 81,180 202,950 81,180 1,269,510 SB Oliver St 1/4m N. Iris Ave John F Kennedy Dr 101,500 891,750 89,175 222,938 89,175 1,394,538 SB Oliver St John F Kennedy Dr Rockwood Av 92,400 - - - - 92,400 SB Oliver St Rockwood Av Cactus Av 101,500 - - - - 101,500 NB Oliver St Cactus Av Brodiaea Ave - 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 951,258 J.1.d
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-8
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs Continued
Dir Street Name From To
New ROW
Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/
Median)
Planning Cost (5%
Of Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering Cost
(25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering And
Admin. Cost (10% Of
Construction Cost) Total Cost
SB Oliver St Cactus Av Brodiaea Ave - 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 $ 951,258 NB Oliver St Brodiaea Ave Alessandro Blvd - 328,020 32,802 82,005 32,802 475,629 SB Oliver St Brodiaea Ave Alessandro Blvd - 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 951,258 NB Old 215 Eucalyptus Ave Dracaea Ave 402,220 844,900 84,490 211,225 84,490 1,627,325 SB Old 215 Eucalyptus Ave Dracaea Ave 402,220 844,900 84,490 211,225 84,490 1,627,325 NB Old 215 Dracaea Ave Alessandro Blvd 989,461 2,078,454 207,845 519,614 207,845 4,003,220 NB Old 215 Alessandro Blvd Cactus Av 773,682 1,625,190 162,519 406,298 162,519 3,130,208 SB Old 215 Alessandro Blvd Cactus Av 773,682 1,625,190 162,519 406,298 162,519 3,130,208 NB Perris Blvd Harley Knox Bl Globe St 46,200 - - - - 46,200 SB Perris Blvd Harley Knox Bl Globe St 92,400 - - - - 92,400 NB Perris Blvd Globe St Nandina Av 490 - - - - 490
NB Perris Blvd San Michele Rd Slate Creek Dr - 49,140 4,914 12,285 4,914 71,253 SB Perris Blvd San Michele Rd Slate Creek Dr - 49,140 4,914 12,285 4,914 71,253 NB Perris Blvd Slate Creek Dr Northern Dancer Dr - 76,050 7,605 19,013 7,605 110,273 SB Perris Blvd Slate Creek Dr Northern Dancer Dr - 76,050 7,605 19,013 7,605 110,273 NB Perris Blvd Northern Dancer Dr Krameria Av - 66,690 6,669 16,673 6,669 96,701 SB Perris Blvd Northern Dancer Dr Krameria Av - 66,690 6,669 16,673 6,669 96,701 NB Perris Blvd Iris Av Santiago Dr - 24,570 2,457 6,143 2,457 35,627 SB Perris Blvd Iris Av Santiago Dr - 24,570 2,457 6,143 2,457 35,627 NB Perris Blvd Santiago Dr Gentian Av - 76,050 7,605 19,013 7,605 110,273 SB Perris Blvd Santiago Dr Gentian Av - 76,050 7,605 19,013 7,605 110,273 NB Perris Blvd Gentian Av Filaree Av - 67,275 6,728 16,819 6,728 97,549 SB Perris Blvd Gentian Av Filaree Av - 67,275 6,728 16,819 6,728 97,549 NB Perris Blvd John F Kennedy Dr Delphinium Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 SB Perris Blvd John F Kennedy Dr Delphinium Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 NB Perris Blvd Delphinium Av Cactus - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 SB Perris Blvd Delphinium Av Cactus - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 NB Perris Blvd Cactus Brodiaea Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 SB Perris Blvd Cactus Brodiaea Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 NB Perris Blvd Brodiaea Av Alessandro Blvd 327,096 366,630 36,663 91,658 36,663 858,710 SB Perris Blvd Brodiaea Av Alessandro Blvd - 38,610 3,861 9,653 3,861 55,985 NB Perris Blvd Bay Av Cottonwood Av 166,026 221,485 22,149 55,371 22,149 487,179 SB Perris Blvd Bay Av Cottonwood Av - 54,990 5,499 13,748 5,499 79,736 NB Perris Blvd Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av 312,312 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,375,539 SB Perris Blvd Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 NB Perris Blvd Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 SB Perris Blvd Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av - 77,220 7,722 19,305 7,722 111,969 NB Perris Blvd Eucalyptus Av Fir Av - 45,630 4,563 11,408 4,563 66,164 SB Perris Blvd Eucalyptus Av Fir Av - 45,630 4,563 11,408 4,563 66,164 NB Perris Blvd Fir Av Sunnymead Blvd 307,272 349,090 34,909 87,273 34,909 813,453 SB Perris Blvd Fir Av Sunnymead Blvd 307,272 349,090 34,909 87,273 34,909 813,453 NB Perris Blvd Sunnymead Blvd Hemlock Av 649,236 727,120 72,712 181,780 72,712 1,703,560 SB Perris Blvd Sunnymead Blvd Hemlock Av 649,236 727,120 72,712 181,780 72,712 1,703,560 NB Perris Blvd Hemlock Av Ironwood Av - 38,142 3,814 9,536 3,814 55,306 SB Perris Blvd Hemlock Av Ironwood Av - 38,142 3,814 9,536 3,814 55,306 NB Perris Blvd Ironwood Av Via Von Batsch - 51,948 5,195 12,987 5,195 75,325 SB Perris Blvd Ironwood Av Via Von Batsch - 51,948 5,195 12,987 5,195 75,325 NB Perris Blvd 1480' N/O Robin Ln Manzanita AVE - 63,765 6,377 15,941 6,377 92,459 SB Perris Blvd 1480' N/O Robin Ln Manzanita AVE - 63,765 6,377 15,941 6,377 92,459 NB Perris Blvd Manzanita Av Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy - 99,216 9,922 24,804 9,922 143,863 SB Perris Blvd Manzanita Av Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy - 99,216 9,922 24,804 9,922 143,863 NB Perris Blvd Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy Canyon Vista Rd 123,269 356,281 35,628 89,070 35,628 639,876 SB Perris Blvd Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy Canyon Vista Rd - 97,344 9,734 24,336 9,734 141,149 NB Perris Blvd Canyon Vista Rd Heacock St 85,050 674,991 67,499 168,748 67,499 1,063,787 SB Perris Blvd Canyon Vista Rd Heacock St - 71,136 7,114 17,784 7,114 103,147 NB Reche Vista Rd Heacock St Northerly City Limit 165,200 1,714,540 171,454 428,635 171,454 2,651,283 SB Reche Vista Rd Heacock St Northerly City Limit 165,200 1,714,540 171,454 428,635 171,454 2,651,283 NB Redlands Blvd Cactus Av Brodiaea Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 SB Redlands Blvd Cactus Av Brodiaea Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 J.1.d
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-9
Appendix Table A.1: Arterial Costs Continued
Dir Street Name From To
New ROW
Cost
Construction Cost
(New Lane/
Unimproved
Segment/
Median)
Planning Cost (5%
Of Construction
Cost)
Design
Engineering Cost
(25% Of
Construction
Cost)
Construction
Engineering And
Admin. Cost (10% Of
Construction Cost) Total Cost
NB Redlands Blvd Brodiaea Av Alessandro Blvd 312,312 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 $ 1,375,539 SB Redlands Blvd Brodiaea Av Alessandro Blvd 312,312 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,375,539 NB Redlands Blvd Alessandro Blvd Bay Av 312,312 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,375,539 SB Redlands Blvd Alessandro Blvd Bay Av 312,312 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,375,539 NB Redlands Blvd Bay Av Cottonwood Av 92,400 694,650 69,465 173,663 69,465 1,099,643 SB Redlands Blvd Bay Av Cottonwood Av 156,629 367,624 36,762 91,906 36,762 689,684 NB Redlands Blvd Cottonwood Av Dracaea Av 92,400 656,040 65,604 164,010 65,604 1,043,658 NB Redlands Blvd Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 SB Redlands Blvd Dracaea Av Eucalyptus Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 NB Redlands Blvd Eucalyptus Av Fir Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 SB Redlands Blvd Eucalyptus Av Fir Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 NB Redlands Blvd Fir Av EB SR60 Fwy On/Off Ramps 40,810 323,681 32,368 80,920 32,368 510,147 SB Redlands Blvd Fir Av EB SR60 Fwy On/Off Ramps 40,810 323,681 32,368 80,920 32,368 510,147 NB Redlands Blvd WB SR 60 Fwy On/Off Ramps Hemlock Av 34,090 270,587 27,059 67,647 27,059 426,441 SB Redlands Blvd WB SR 60 Fwy On/Off Ramps Hemlock Av 34,090 270,587 27,059 67,647 27,059 426,441 NB Redlands Blvd Hemlock Av Ironwood Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 SB Redlands Blvd Hemlock Av Ironwood Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 NB Redlands Blvd Ironwood Av Juniper Av 92,820 736,242 73,624 184,061 73,624 1,160,371 SB Redlands Blvd Ironwood Av Juniper Av 92,820 736,242 73,624 184,061 73,624 1,160,371 NB Redlands Blvd Juniper Av Kalmia Av 96,600 763,080 76,308 190,770 76,308 1,203,066 SB Redlands Blvd Juniper Av Kalmia Av 84,000 673,620 67,362 168,405 67,362 1,060,749 NB Redlands Blvd Kalmia Av Locust Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 SB Redlands Blvd Kalmia Av Locust Av 92,400 733,260 73,326 183,315 73,326 1,155,627 NB Redlands Blvd Locust Av Northern City Limits 104,860 832,139 83,214 208,035 83,214 1,311,462 SB Redlands Blvd Locust Av Northern City Limits 104,860 832,139 83,214 208,035 83,214 1,311,462 NB Street E Loop around WLC Pkwy CW 0 742,000 6,519,000 651,900 1,629,750 651,900 10,194,550 SB Street E Loop around WLC Pkwy CCW 0 742,000 6,519,000 651,900 1,629,750 651,900 10,194,550 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyAlessandro Blvd Bay Av 89,880 638,148 63,815 159,537 63,815 1,015,195 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyAlessandro Blvd Bay Av 89,880 638,148 63,815 159,537 63,815 1,015,195 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyBay Av Cottonwood Av 92,960 660,016 66,002 165,004 66,002 1,049,983 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyBay Av Cottonwood Av 92,960 660,016 66,002 165,004 66,002 1,049,983 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyCottonwood Av Dracaea Av 91,700 651,070 65,107 162,768 65,107 1,035,752 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyCottonwood Av Dracaea Av 91,700 651,070 65,107 162,768 65,107 1,035,752 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyDracaea Av Eucalyptus Av 184,100 1,307,110 130,711 326,778 130,711 2,079,410 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyDracaea Av Eucalyptus Av 184,100 1,307,110 130,711 326,778 130,711 2,079,410 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyEucalyptus Ave Fir Av (Future Eucalyptus) 187,600 1,331,960 133,196 332,990 133,196 2,118,942 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyEucalyptus Ave Fir Av (Future Eucalyptus) 187,600 1,331,960 133,196 332,990 133,196 2,118,942 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyFir Av (Future Eucalyptus) EB SR60 Fwy On/Off Ramps 84,000 596,400 59,640 149,100 59,640 948,780 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyFir Av (Future Eucalyptus) EB SR60 Fwy On/Off Ramps 84,000 596,400 59,640 149,100 59,640 948,780 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyWB SR60 On/Off Ramps Hemlock Av 145,180 1,030,778 103,078 257,695 103,078 1,639,808 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyWB SR60 On/Off Ramps Hemlock Av 145,180 1,030,778 103,078 257,695 103,078 1,639,808 NB World Logistics Ctr PkwyHemlock Av Ironwood Av 92,750 658,525 65,853 164,631 65,853 1,047,611 SB World Logistics Ctr PkwyHemlock Av Ironwood Av 92,750 658,525 65,853 164,631 65,853 1,047,611 Total - NS Arterial Streets $ 274,262,146
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT City of Moreno Valle
y Development Impact Fee Study Update A-10
Table A.2: Lease Revenue Bond - Discounted Debt Service Costs Payment (Nominal Dollars) Discount Payment (Real Dollars) Month Year Arterial DIF Police DIF Fire DIF Factor1 Arterial DIF Police DIF Fire DIF 2014 Lease Revenue Bonds Refunding
May 2024 $ 199,326 $ 120,460 $ 45,397 0.930 $ 185,420 $ 112,056 $ 42,230 Nov 2024 199,326 120,460 45,397 0.930 185,420 112,056 42,230 May 2025 185,024 111,818 42,140 0.865 160,107 96,760 36,465 Nov 2025 185,024 111,818 42,140 0.865 160,107 96,760 36,465 May 2026 169,967 102,719 38,710 0.805 136,817 82,685 31,160 Nov 2026 169,967 102,719 38,710 0.805 136,817 82,685 31,160 May 2027 154,250 93,220 35,131 0.749 115,502 69,803 26,306 Nov 2027 154,250 93,220 35,131 0.749 115,502 69,803 26,306 May 2028 137,635 83,179 31,347 0.697 95,871 57,939 21,835 Nov 2028 137,635 83,179 31,347 0.697 95,871 57,939 21,835 May 2029 120,218 72,653 27,380 0.648 77,897 47,076 17,741 Nov 2029 120,218 72,653 27,380 0.648 77,897 47,076 17,741 May 2030 101,952 61,614 23,220 0.603 61,452 37,138 13,996 Nov 2030 101,952 61,614 23,220 0.603 61,452 37,138 13,996 May 2031 86,584 52,326 19,720 0.561 48,548 29,339 11,057 Nov 2031 86,584 52,326 19,720 0.561 48,548 29,339 11,057 May 2032 70,573 42,651 16,073 0.522 36,810 22,246 8,383 Nov 2032 70,573 42,651 16,073 0.522 36,810 22,246 8,383 May 2033 53,959 32,610 12,289 0.485 26,181 15,822 5,963 Nov 2033 53,959 32,610 12,289 0.485 26,181 15,822 5,963 May 2034 36,703 22,181 8,359 0.451 16,566 10,011 3,773
Nov 2034 36,703 22,181 8,359 0.451 16,566 10,011 3,773
May 2035 18,729 11,319 4,266 0.420 7,863 4,752 1,791
Nov 2035 18,729 11,319 4,266 0.420 7,863 4,752 1,791
Total $ 2,669,840 $ 1,613,500 $ 608,064 $ 1,938,066 $ 1,171,256 $ 441,400 Total $ 2,669,840 $ 1,613,500 $ 608,064 $ 1,938,066 $ 1,171,256 $ 441,400 1Discount rate assumed to be 7.5% per year.

Source: Moreno Valley Public Finance Authority - 2014 Partial Refunding of 2005 Lease Revenue Bonds; Willdan Financial Services.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-11
Appendix Table A.3: DIF Controller Upgrades
North-South Street East-West Street
Graham St Sunnymead Bl
Moreno Valley Plza Sunnymead Bl
Valley Springs Pkwy Eucalyptus Av
Day St Eucalyptus Av
Day St Ironwood Av
Barclay Dr Ironwood Av
Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy Old Lake Dr
Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy Village Rd
Heacock St Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy
Heacock St Manzanita Av
Heacock St Gregory Ln
Back Wy Sunnymead Bl
Kitching St Ironwood Av
Slawson Av Ironwood Av
Kitching St Iris Av
Kitching St Alessandro Bl
Lasselle St Alessandro Bl
Heacock St John F. Kennedy Dr
Indian St San Michele Rd
Heacock St San Michele Rd
Perris Bl Sunnymead Ranch Pkwy
Indian St Iris Av
Heacock St Parkland Av
Los Cabos Dr Iris Av
Moreno Beach Dr Cottonwood Av
Morton Rd Box Spring Rd
Perris Bl Manzanita Av
Morrison St Alessandro Bl
Moreno Beach Dr Ironwood Av
Nason St Ironwood Av
Moreno Beach Dr Trail Ridge Wy
Apple Blossom Alessandro Bl
Elsworth St Eucalyptus Av
Fir Av Eucalyptus Av
Stoneridge Town Ct Fir Av
Day St Dracaea Av
Morrison St Eucalyptus Av
Redlands Bl Cottonwood Av
Stoneridge Towne Ctr Eucalyptus Ave
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-12
Appendix Table A.4: Future DIF Signal Locations
North-South Street East-West Street
Brandt Dr/Via Vargas Alessandro Bl
Chara St Alessandro Bl
Civic Center Dr Alessandro Bl
btw. Lasselle & Morri Alessandro Bl
btw Morrison & Quincy Alessandro Bl
btw Nason & Oliver Alessandro Bl
Wilmot St Alessandro Bl
Kitching St Elder Av
Lasselle St Elder Av
Morrison St Elder Av
Alona St Eucalyptus Av
btw. Morrison & Nason Eucalyptus Av
Pan Am Bl Eucalyptus Av
Pepperbush Dr Eucalyptus Av
Quincy St Eucalyptus Av
Shirebourn Rd Eucalyptus Av
Sunnymeadows Dr Eucalyptus Av
Wichita Wy Eucalyptus Av
Heacock St Cardinal Av
Heacock St Delphinium Av
Heacock St Meander Ct
Heacock St Poppystone Dr
Emma Ln Iris Av
Wedow Dr Iris Av
Morrison/Avocado Ironwood Av
Oliver St Ironwood Av
Quincy St Ironwood Av
Rio Grande Dr John F. Kennedy Dr
Legendary Dr John F. Kennedy Dr
Vinehill St John F. Kennedy Dr
Pepper Ct John F. Kennedy Dr
Lasselle St Brodiaea Av
Lasselle St Delphinium Av
Lasselle St Dracaea Av
Lasselle St Fir Av
Quincy St Locust St
Redlands Bl Locust St
Moreno Beach Dr Encilia Ave
Moreno Beach Dr Dracaea Av
Moreno Beach Dr Juniper Av
Moreno Beach Dr Kalmia Av
Nason St Archie Av
Nason St Bay Av
Nason St Delphinium Av
Old 215 Frontage Rd Bay Av
Old 215 Frontage Rd Dracaea Av
J.1.d
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND City of Moreno Valley Development Impact Fee Study Updat e
A-13
Appendix Table A.4: Future DIF Signal Locations Continued North-South Street East-West Street
Perris Bl Canyon Vista Rd
Quincy St Encilia Ave
Redlands Bl Bay Av
Redlands Bl Brodiaea Av
Redlands Bl Dracaea Av
Redlands Bl Juniper Av
Redlands Bl Kalmia Av
Old Country Rd (East) Sunnymead Ranch Pw
Old Country Rd (West) Sunnymead Ranch Pw
Oliver St Alessandro Bl
Quincy St Alessandro Bl
Redlands Bl Alessandro Bl
Morrison St Cactus Av
Quincy St Cactus Av
Elsworth St Cottonwood Av
Old 215 Frontage Rd Cottonwood Av
Quincy St Cottonwood Av
Day St Bay Av
Kitching St Eucalyptus Av
Lasselle St Eucalyptus Av
Indian St Gentian Av
Kitching St Gentian Av
Heacock St Lake Summit Dr
Heacock St Nandina Ave
Indian St Eucalyptus Av
Indian St Sundial Wy
Lasselle St Ironwood Av
Oliver St John F. Kennedy Dr
Redlands Bl John F. Kennedy Dr
Indian St Krameria Av
Moreno Beach Dr Locust St
Indian St Manzanita Av
Moreno Beach Dr Bay Av
Moreno Beach Dr Brodiaea Av
Moreno Beach Dr Hemlock Av
Moreno Beach Dr Auburn Ln
Old 215 Frontage Rd Day St
Redlands Bl Encilia Ave
Kitching St Sunnymead Bl
Pigeon Pass Rd Sunnymead Ranch Pw
Lake Vista Rd Sunnymead Ranch Pw
Hubbard St Ironwood Ave
Oliver St Delphinium Av
Sinclair St Ironwood Av
Pigeon Pass Rd Hidden Springs Dr (N)
Moreno Beach Dr Championship Dr
Hospital Cactus Ave
Indian St Grove View
Gilman Springs Rd Eucalyptus Ave
Gilman Springs Rd Alessandro Bl
Source: City of Moreno Valley.

J.1.d
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: 2024 Development Impact Fee Schedule Impact Fee Study Update (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND J.1.e
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) i
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ii
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ···
Momentum MoVal,
Momentum MoVal
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ·ª
Ì¿¾´»ï
Streets and Highways

50.66%
Bridges

2.05%
Buildings
Drainage 13.10%

1.08%
Electric Utility

20.75%
Landscaping

5.68%
Parks

0.61%
Traffic Signals

2.22%
Other

3.85%
FYs 2023/24 &2024/25 Capital Budget Category Overview
Ú·¹«®» ï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ª
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ª·
Ì¿¾´» î
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ª··
Air Quality Management

0.08%
Capital ProjectsReimbur sments

25.11%
Community Facility District No. 1

0.04%
Community Facility District No. 2014-01

0.10%
DIF Arterial Streets Capital
Projects…
DIF Interchange Improvements Capital
Projects

0.19%
DIF Traffic Signals Capital Projects

0.49%
Electric - Restricted Assets

21.13%
Facility Construction

13.14%
Gas Tax

21.58%
LMD 2014-02 Landscape Maint Dist

2.01%
Measure A

4.18%
Parks & Community Services (Parkland)

0.26%
Parks & Community Services (Quimby)

0.53%
Public Works General Capital Projects

0.20%
Strom Water Management

1.10%
Technology
Services
Assets

3.92%
Zone D Standard Landscape

2.94%
Zone E Extensive Landscape

0.10%
Zone M Median Maintenance

0.64%
FYs 2023/24 & 2024/25 Capital Budget Fund Overview
Figure 2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ª···
Ø·¹¸´·¹¸¬- ±º Ò»© Ю±¶»½¬-
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ·¨
ooooooo
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨
Ø·¹¸´·¹¸¬- ±º Ю»ª·±«-´§ ß°°®±ª»¼ ñ ײ Ю±¹®»-- Ю±¶»½¬- J.1.e
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨·
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨··
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨···
Ý¿°·¬¿´ Þ«¼¹»¬
Û¨½»´´»²½» ß©¿®¼
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨·ª
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨ª
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨ª·
Ý·¬§ ݱ«²½·´
Ý·¬§ ݱ«²½·´ Ù±¿´-
Revenue Diversification and Preservation
Advocacy
Public Safety
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness
Public Facilities and Capital Projects
Positive Environment
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨ª··
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨·¨
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨·
*Fund
Department
Division
Section
Account Code
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨··
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨···
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨·ª
Project Number Fund Phase
801 0008 70 77-2000-04
801 0008 70 77
Example Project Number
Phase 00
Staff Salaries
Phase 04
Construction
Contract
Phase 01
Preliminary
Engineering
Phase 05
Construction
Engineering
Phase 98
Revenue
Phase 02
Design
Phase 06
Other
Phase 99
Budget
Phase 03
Right of Way
Phase 07
Public Outreach
and Education
2000
Fund
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨ª
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨ª·
ͬ®»»¬ Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
Þ®·¼¹» Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
Þ«·´¼·²¹ Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨ª··
Ü®¿·²¿¹» Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
Û´»½¬®·½ ˬ·´·¬§ Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
Ô¿²¼-½¿°» Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
п®µ Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
Ì®¿ºº·½ Í·¹²¿´ Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
˲¼»®¹®±«²¼ ˬ·´·¬§ Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ¨¨ª···
Ѭ¸»® Ó¿·²¬»²¿²½»
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Streets and Highways
Funded Projects
Partially Funded Projects
S-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-3
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-4
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-5
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-6
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-7
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-8
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-9
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-10
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-11
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-12
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-13
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-14
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-15
Deleted
NewIn Progress
On Hold
Completed Deferrable (Start within 5 to 10 yrs)
Necessary (Start within 1 to 3 yrs)Essential (Start within 1 yr)Desirable (Start within 3 to 5 yrs) District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-16
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-17
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-18
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-19
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-20
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-21
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-22
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-23
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-24
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-25
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-26
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-27
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-28
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-29
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) S-30
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þ®·¼¹»-
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
BR-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) BR-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) BR-3
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) BR-4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) BR-5
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) BR-6
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) BR-7
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) BR-8
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þ«·´¼·²¹-
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
B-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-3
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-4
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-5
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-6
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-7
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-8
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-9
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-10
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-11
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-12
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-13
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-14
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-15
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-16
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷ Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-17
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) B-18
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ü®¿·²¿¹»
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
D-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) D-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) D-3
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) D-4
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) D-5
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) D-6
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) D-7
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) D-8
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Û´»½¬®·½ ˬ·´·¬§
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
E1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-3
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-4
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-5
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-6
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-7
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-8
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-9
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-10
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-11
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-12
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-13
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-14
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-15
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-16
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-17
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-18
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-19
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) E-20
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ô¿²¼-½¿°·²¹
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
L-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) L-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ôóí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ôóì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ôóë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) L-6
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) п®µÚ«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
P-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-3
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-4
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-5
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-6
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-7
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-8
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-9
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-10
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-11
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) P-12
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ì®¿ºº·½ Í·¹²¿´-
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
T-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) T-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) T-3
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) T-4
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) T-5
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) TÜ»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) TÜ»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) TÜ»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) TÜ»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) TÜ»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷
Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼ ݱ³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) TÜ·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) TÜ»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷
Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ˲¼»®¹®±«²¼ ˬ·´·¬·»-
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
U-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) U-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) U-3
Ü·-¬®·½¬ ï Ü·-¬®·½¬ î Ü·-¬®·½¬ í Ü·-¬®·½¬ ì
Ü»´»¬»¼
Ò»©×² Ю±¹®»-- Ѳ ر´¼Ý±³°´»¬»¼ Ü»º»®®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ë ¬± ï𠧮-÷ Ò»½»--¿®§ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï ¬± í §®-÷Û--»²¬·¿´ øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² ï §®÷Ü»-·®¿¾´» øͬ¿®¬ ©·¬¸·² í ¬± ë §®-÷ J.1.e
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) U-4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ѭ¸»®
Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ﮬ·¿´´§ Ú«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ñóï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) O-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A1-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A1-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A1-3
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A2-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A2-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A2-3
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A2-4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A2-5
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ßîóê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ì¿¾´» ±º ݱ²¬»²¬-
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ßíóï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A3-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ͬ®»»¬- ¿²¼ Ø·¹¸©¿§-
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Íóíï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ͬ®»»¬- ¿²¼ Ø·¹¸©¿§-
Íóíî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ͬ®»»¬- ¿²¼ Ø·¹¸©¿§-
Íóíí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóíì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóíë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóíê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóíé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóíè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóíç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóìç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóëç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóêç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóéç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóèç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóçç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïðç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïïç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïîð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïîï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïîî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïîí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïîì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïîë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Íóïîê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þ®·¼¹»-
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ÞÎóç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóïç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞÎóîð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þ«·´¼·²¹-
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Þóïç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóîç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóíç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóìð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóìï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóìî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóìí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóìì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóìë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Þóìê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ü®¿·²¿¹»
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Üóç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóïç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Üóîð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Û´»½¬®·½ ˬ·´·¬§
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ûóîï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóîç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóíð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóíï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóíî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóíí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóíì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóíë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ûóíê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ô¿²¼-½¿°·²¹
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ôóé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ôóè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) п®µ˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ðóïí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóïì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóïë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóïê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóïé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóïè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóïç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóîç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóíç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóìð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóìï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóìî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóìí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóìì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóìë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóìê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ì®¿ºº·½ Í·¹²¿´-
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ìóïí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ì®¿ºº·½ Í·¹²¿´-
Ìóïì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóïë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóïê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóïé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóïè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóïç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóîç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóíç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóìç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóëç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóêç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóéð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóéï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóéî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóéí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóéì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóéë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ìóéê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ˲¼»®¹®±«²¼ ˬ·´·¬·»-
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ëóë
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ëóê
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ëóé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ëóè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ѭ¸»®
˲º«²¼»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ñóé
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóç
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóïð
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóïï
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóïî
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóïí
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ñóïì
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ͬ®»»¬- ¿²¼ Ø·¹¸©¿§-
ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Þ«·´¼·²¹-
ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Ü®¿·²¿¹»
ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
Û´»½¬®·½ ˬ·´·¬§
ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
п®µݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ю±
¶»½¬-
A4-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ì®¿ºº·½ Í·¹²¿´-
ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
ݱ³°´»¬»¼ Ю±¶»½¬- Ô·º»ó¬±óÜ¿¬» Û¨°»²¼·¬«®»-
̸®±«¹¸ ÚÇ îðîïñîðîî
Þ«¼¹»¬
ÚÇ îðîîñîðîí
*These projects started after the adoption of the FY 21/23 CIP and completed before the adoption of the FY 23/25 CIP.

Completed Mid Year FY 21/23 Projects*
A4-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÍóíÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÍóêÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÍóéÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÍóèÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÍóïðÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞóìÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞóëÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞóïðÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÞóïïÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÜóìÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÛóéÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÛóïðÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÛóïìÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÐóìÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÐóéÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Ðóè
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÐóçÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÌóíÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÌóëÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÌóêÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÌóéÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÌóèÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÌóçÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) ÌóïðÝ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) Û´»½¬®·½ ˬ·´·¬§
Ü»´»¬»¼ Ю±¶»½¬-
A5-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A5-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) 󗐆
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-3
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-5
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-6
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-7
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-8
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-9
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-10
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-11
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A6
-12
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A7-1
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A7-2
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A7-3
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) A7-4
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) J.1.e
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE) º·-½¿´ §»¿®- îðîíñîì ú îðîìñîë
ÐÎÛÐßÎÛÜ ÞÇ ÌØÛ ÐËÞÔ×Ý ÉÑÎÕÍ ÜÛÐßÎÌÓÛÒÌ
ïìïéé Ú®»¼»®·½µ ͬ®»»¬ Ó±®»²± Ê¿´´»§ô Ýß çîëëîóðèðë
çëïòìïíòíïíð ¤ ³±ª¿´ò±®¹
ßÜÑÐÌÛÜ
J.1.e
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: AdoptedCIP-FY2023-25a (6567 : DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE NEXUS STUDY AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE)