Moreno Valley City Council
May 21, 2024

improvements that were constructed from bond proceeds.

Due to the timing of development impact revenues, the Police Facility DIF is currently reporting a cash balance, which will require a loan from the General Fund to comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. These loans will be updated annually until such time as the revenues received by the Development Impact Fee funds are sufficient to extinguish the loan balances.

The following table shows the activity for the current fiscal year and the ending loan balances to be recorded. If approved, these entries will be recorded for June 30, 2024 and then the funds will be re-evaluated in June 2025.

Fund
Loan
Balance
6/30/23 Repayment
Loan
Increase
Loan Balance
6/30/24
Police Facilities DIF $5,500,000 $0 $500,000 $6,000,000 • Police Facility Development Impact Fees: From $5,500,000 to $6,000,000 In June 2005, the City issued the 2005 Lease Revenue Bonds in the amount of $48.2 million. Included in the approved projects for the bonds were various projects which were to be repaid through the utilization of Development Impact Fees that were to be collected from developers in future years. These projects included the expansion of the Public Safety Building, the construction of the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) building, Fire Station 58 and various arterial street projects. The bond documents called for the repayment of this bond over the following 30 years with the final payment occurring in November 2035. In 2013 and 2014 these initial bonds were refinanced to reduce the overall debt service payment. Although the bonds are secured by the General Fund, the revenue stream from development impact fees for Arterial Streets, Police Facility and Fire Facilities was pledged to meet these annual debt service requirements associated to each of the funds. The payment of existing debt service has been identified as the first priority from the development fee funds. The annual debt service requirement attributable to the Police Facility DIF currently is approximately $582,000 per year until FY 2036. Based on balances in the fund at the close of FY 2022-23 and the projected activities during FY 2023-24, the Police Facilities DIF fund is expected to require an increase in the loan amount by $500,000.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt proposed resolution approving Amendment No. 11 to the Loan Agreement approved in the resolution approving a loan from the General Fund to the Police Facility Development Impact Fee fund ($6,000,000). Staff recommends this alternative because this authorizes the recordation of the revised loan amounts to address current cash balances in these funds and allows the City to remain in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

2. Do not adopt proposed resolution approving Amendment No. 11 to the Loan I.15
Packet Pg. 326

Agreement and provide staff with other direction. Staff does not recommend this alternative because it will not address the current cash balances in these funds and the City’s financial statements may not comply with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total loan balance amount of $6,000,000 from the General Fund will continue to be designated as non-spendable until repaid. As Development Impact Fee revenues related to the Police Facility Development Impact Fee accounts are received, they will be applied to continue to reduce the outstanding loan amounts for these funds.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of the agenda

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Kimberly Ganimian Launa Jimenez
Deputy Finance Director Chief Financial Officer / City Treasurer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Resolution 2024-xx City Council

2. Exhibit A_to_Reso 2024-XX

APPROVALS
I.15
Packet Pg. 327

Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 5/12/24 1:30 PM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 5/13/24 9:02 AM
I.15
Packet Pg. 328
Date Adopted: May 21, 2024
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO
VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE

LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY AND

THE POLICE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND
WHEREAS, the City Council levies a fee for the mitigation of the impacts of new development on the City’s Police Facilities and related facilities pursuant to the California Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Section 6600 et seq.); and WHEREAS, the City has made disbursement from these funds that have resulted in negative cash balances in the Police Facility Development Impact Fee Fund (approximately $6,000,000) and
WHEREAS, the City has a need to resolve the negative cash balances in these accounts; and
WHEREAS, on June 25, 2013 the City Council approved Resolution 2013-59 authorizing the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Recreation Center DIF ($145,000) and the Police Facility DIF ($3,000,000) and the Animal Shelter DIF ($175,000); and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2014 the City Council approved Resolution 2014-45 authorizing Amendment No. 1 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Recreation Center DIF (decreased to $110,000) the Police Facility DIF (increased to $3,500,000) and the Animal Shelter DIF (decreased to $162,000); and WHEREAS, on June 9, 2015 the City Council approved Resolution 2015-38 authorizing Amendment No. 2 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Recreation Center DIF (decreased to $60,000) the Police Facility DIF (remained at $3,500,000) and the Animal Shelter DIF (decreased to $147,000); and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2016 the City Council approved Resolution 2016-33 authorizing Amendment No. 3 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Recreation Center DIF (decreased to $0) the Police Facility DIF (increased to $4,085,000) and the Animal Shelter DIF (decreased to $137,000); and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2017 the City Council approved Resolution 2017-28 authorizing Amendment No. 4 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Police Facility DIF (increased to $4,290,500) and the Animal Shelter DIF (decreased to $100,000); and
I.15.a
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Resolution 2024-xx City Council (6637 : ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT 2 Resolution No. 2023-
Date Adopted: May 21, 2024
1 Resolution No. 2021-
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2018 the City Council approved Resolution 2018-21 authorizing Amendment No. 5 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Police Facility DIF (increased to $4,756,000) and the Animal Shelter DIF (decreased to $53,000); and
WHEREAS, on April 16, 2019 the City Council approved Resolution 2019-16 authorizing Amendment No. 6 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Police Facility DIF (decreased to $4,400,000) and the Animal Shelter DIF (decreased to $0); and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2020 the City Council approved Resolution 2020-22 authorizing Amendment No. 7 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Police Facility DIF (increased to $4,700,000); and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2021 the City Council approved Resolution 2021-52 authorizing Amendment No. 8 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Police Facility DIF (increased to $5,050,000); and WHEREAS, on June 21, 2022 the City Council approved Resolution 2022-44 authorizing Amendment No. 9 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund and the Police Facility DIF (increased to $5,400,000); and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2023 the City Council approved Resolution 2023-41 authorizing Amendment No. 10 to the original Loan Agreement between the General Fund to the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund (increased to $5,500,000); and WHEREAS, the City desires to loan funds from the General Fund to the Police Facilities Development Impact Fee Fund (increased to $6,000,000) in amounts sufficient to cover the negative cash balances; and
WHEREAS, the City anticipates receiving future Police Facilities Development Impact Fees to repay these loans to the General Fund

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

BE IT RESOLVED that the Loan Agreement-Amendment No. 11 included as Exhibit A is hereby approved, authorizing the Loan Agreement from the General Fund and continuing the funding of the loans to the Police Facility DIF ($6,000,000).

I.15.a
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Resolution 2024-xx City Council (6637 : ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT 3 Resolution No. 2023-
Date Adopted: May 21, 2024
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21th day of May, 2024.
___________________________
Mayor of the City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
____________________________
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
City Attorney
I.15.a
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Resolution 2024-xx City Council (6637 : ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT 4 Resolution No. 2023-
Date Adopted: May 21, 2024

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, Jane Halstead, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2024- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21th day of May 2024 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
___________________________________

CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
I.15.a
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Resolution 2024-xx City Council (6637 : ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT Exhibit A
LOAN AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 11
The City of Moreno Valley is authorizing this AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT (“Amendment 11”) as an interfund loan entered into as of the twenty first day of May 2024, authorizing the transfer of funds by and between the CITY OF MORENO VALLEY GENERAL FUND (herein the “General Fund”) and the

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY POLICE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND (herein the “Police Facility DIF).

RECITALS
A. Pursuant to the provision of the California Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code Section 66000 et seq,), the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley has approved the levy of a Police Facility Development Impact Fee to collect fees to mitigate the impact of new development on the City’s Police facilities.

B. The City has negative cash balances in the Police Facility DIF.

C. These cash balances are the result of the construction of facilities.

D. The Police Facility DIF continues to receive revenues related to new development projects within the City.

E. The City desires to loan the Police Facility DIF funds in an amount sufficient to offset the negative cash balances related to these funds.

AGREEMENT

1. The City has applied cash collected during Fiscal Year 2023-24 by the Police Facilities DIF in the amount of $278,244.00 into the calculation of the loan amount.

Fund
Loan Balance
6/30/2023
Loan
Repayment
Increase to
Loan Amount
Loan Balance
6/30/2024
Police Facility DIF $5,500,000 $0 $500,000 $6,000,000

2. City staff is directed to make necessary appropriation adjustments to effectuate this loan.
1 Resolution No. 2024-
Date Adopted: May 21, 2024
I.15.b
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Exhibit A_to_Reso 2024-XX (6637 : ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT

3. City staff is directed to appropriately record this loan in the City’s General Ledger system and subsequent financial reports, as necessary.

4. This loan is considered to be non-interest bearing.

5. The funds will be repaid by June 30, 2025.

6. If the funds are not repaid on or before June 30, 2025 in full, the City Council will reconsider this matter.

IN WITNESS WHEROF, the parties have executed Amendment 11 as of the date first above written.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
By:
_______________________
Mike Lee
ATTEST:
_______________________
Jane Halstead
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________

City Attorney
City Manager
2 Resolution No. 2024-
Date Adopted: May 21, 2024
I.15.b
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Exhibit A_to_Reso 2024-XX (6637 : ADOPT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT Report to City Council
ID#6647 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of the
Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services Director AGENDA DATE: May 21, 2024
TITLE: ACCEPT FUNDING FROM CA STATE PARKS HABITAT

CONSERVATION FUND PROG-EQUESTRIAN PARK

TRAIL ENHANCEMENTS

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations: That the City Council and CSD:

1. Authorize the City Manager/Executive Director or its Authorized Representative, Parks & Community Services Director, or designee to accept grant award from California State Parks for the Habitat Conservation Fund Grant Program under the California Wildlife Protection Act of 1990 for enhancements along the Equestrian Park & Nature Center Trail in the amount of $122,500; and

2. Authorize the City Manager/Executive Director or designee to process necessary budget adjustments and appropriations in FY 24/25 for the grant award funds received.

SUMMARY
The city received notification of award funding recommendation from the Department of Parks and Recreation’s Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) on March 18, 2024, for the Equestrian Park & Nature Center trail enhancements project.

This report recommends acceptance of $122,500 in grant funding from the California State Parks Habitat Conservation Fund Grant Program for this project.

The grant funding along with the required City match of $122,500 will allow for improvements along the Equestrian Park & Nature Center trail that will expand I.16
Packet Pg. 335

opportunities for a multi-use trail and connect residents to the outdoor setting. The enhancements include trailhead solar safety lighting, water troughs, covered information booths such as maps, precautions, trail map kiosks along the trail letting you know your location, horse trail directional signage, permanent waterless restroom building, benches, and shade structures.

DISCUSSION
The California Wildlife Protection Act of 1990, which largely defines the Habitat Conservation Fund (HCF) Program, provides funds to the State of California for grants to local agencies to protect fish, wildlife, and native plant resources, to acquire or develop wildlife corridors and trails, and to provide for nature interpretation programs and other programs which bring urban residents into park and wildlife areas.

One of the eligible uses of funding under the HCF Grant Trails Category includes the enhancement, restoration, or development of trails. The City’s application focused on the enhancement of the Equestrian Park & Nature Center trail to expand access and connect residents to outdoors and wildlife area.

The total anticipated project cost is $245,000. The City will be required to provide matching funds on a dollar-for-dollar basis in the amount of $122,500. Matching funds will come from DIF Park Improvements fund 2905. The grant performance period will be from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2029.

The City will enter into an agreement with The Department of Parks and Recreation’s Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) to administer these grant funds and will provide the required documentation and reporting as stipulated by the grant agreement.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. Staff recommends this alternative as it will have a positive impact on the community by providing funding for improvements of the Equestrian Park & Nature Center Trail.

2. Do not approve the recommended actions as presented in this staff report.

Staff does not recommend this alternative as it will not provide the opportunity for funding to conduct improvements at the Equestrian Park & Nature Center Trail

FISCAL IMPACT
This project will be budgeted in fund 2300 (grant funding) and fund 3015 (City Match).

Description Fund GL Account No. Type
(Rev/Exp)
FY 24/25
Budget
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 24/25
Amended
Budget
I.16
Packet Pg. 336

State Grant -
Capital Revenue
2300 2300-50-57-80007-486010
Project 807 0061-2300-98
Rev $0 $122,500 $122,500
CIP Other 2300 2300-50-57-80007-720199
Project 807 0061-2300-99
Exp $0 $122,500 $122,500
DIF-Park
Improvements
2905 2905-99-95-92905-903015 Exp $1,260,050 $122,500 $1,382,550 PCS Cap Proj.
(Park Improv.)
3015 3015-99-99-93015-802905 Rev $1,260,050 $122,500 $1,382,550 PCS Cap Proj.
(Park Improv.)
3015 3015-50-57-80007-720199
Project 807 0061-3015-99
Exp $1,845,375 $122,500 $1,967,875

NOTIFICATION
Posting of Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Patty Yhuit Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Admin & Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Revenue Diversification and Preservation. Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.

Public Facilities and Capital Projects. Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness. Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
I.16
Packet Pg. 337

To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. XT-33-008_HCF-Trails_Equestrian Park & Nature Center Trail Enhancements

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 5/12/24 2:15 PM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 5/13/24 9:05 AM
I.16
Packet Pg. 338
I.16.a
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: XT-33-008_HCF-Trails_Equestrian Park & Nature Center Trail Enhancements (6647 : ACCEPT FUNDING FROM CA STATE PARKS Report to City Council
ID#6636 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kenneth Reichle, Chief of Police
AGENDA DATE: May 21, 2024
TITLE: APPROVE USE OF EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUNDS

AND ASSET FORFEITURE FUNDS TO PURCHASE LAW

ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations:

1. Authorize the Police Department to purchase law enforcement equipment, related software, and support at a cost of $113,528.80; and

2. Approve the use of Equipment Replacement Reserve funds and Asset Forfeiture funds and the proposed budget adjustments as set forth in the Fiscal Impact section of this report; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to approve a Purchase Order with Precision Survey Supply, LLC, for the law enforcement equipment, related software, and support for a total cost of $113,528.80.

SUMMARY
This report recommends the City Council authorize the Moreno Valley Police Department (MVPD) to purchase law enforcement equipment, software, training and technical support, and software maintenance to replace the current outdated equipment purchased in 2018. MVPD proposes utilizing $76,730.94 of Equipment Replacement Reserve funds and $36,797.86 of Asset Forfeiture revenue funds secured by the County of Riverside for a total of $113,528.80 to acquire replacement equipment to document and investigate major injury collisions, fatal collisions, and vehicular homicides. This new technology will enhance the efficiency and quality of collision and crime scene investigations.

DISCUSSION
I.17
Packet Pg. 340

For more than fifteen years, MVPD has used accident reconstruction technology and equipment to make roadway safety a priority for the community as well as ensuring that deputies and investigators have a reliable, efficient, accurate method for investigating and documenting collision and crime scenes on the roadway for prosecutorial soundness.

In 2009, a Leica Scan Station C10 (LSS) was purchased, providing the best technology at the time for traffic collision investigations. Eight years later, in 2018, after it was well passed its life expectancy and technological effectiveness, the City Council approved the replacement of the aged system with a FARO laser scanner- again providing the technology needed to provide the community with the technology needed to investigate and reconstruct traffic collisions.

Presently, the 2018 FARO has exceeded its life expectancy and technological effectiveness. The device no longer allows investigative personnel to properly process a collision scene for reconstruction or for prosecutorial documentation due to its inability to be upgraded.

The replacement system will allow for the production of detailed diagrams of collision or crime scenes for both reconstruction and prosecution of any criminal action accurately and efficiently. The upgraded Leica system will increase the processing and analysis speed by six minutes per scan from eight minutes to two minutes. It will also reduce the number of scans required by approximately 50% with the average collision scene currently requiring 15-20 3D scans. Additional advantages of the proposed replacement equipment include an automatic self-leveling capability with onboarded GPS without concerns about surface conditions and its ability to identify and remove discrepancies that may occur because of movement around the scene. The level of precision and detail collected from the 3D laser scanner will allow for the creation of accurate 3D models of any scene for further analysis.

The newer technology makes it possible to “revisit” the collision or crime scene at any time to reconstruct the view regardless of visibility utilizing approximately two million data points per scan via Leica’s CAD system.

Based on the above, the Police Department requests to purchase the Leica RTC360 Laser Scanner with the required software, training and technical support, and software maintenance as identified in the attached quote. Staff are requesting this equipment from a sole source vendor, Precision Survey Supply, LLC, for a total of $113,528.80 ($104,742.65 for the Laser Scanner system and support, plus $8,786.15 sales tax). The total includes an $18,000 trade-in discount as well as $3,400 in discounts for training and hardware. The annual software maintenance fee will be budgeted in the annual General Fund budget allocation for the Police department in FY2025/2026 and in subsequent years while the system is operational. The Equipment Replacement Fund and Asset Forfeiture revenue will cover the initial purchase and first year of software maintenance and technical support.

I.17
Packet Pg. 341

ALTERNATIVES

1. Authorize the purchase of law enforcement equipment, software, and support, totaling $113,528.80 and approve budget adjustments as set forth in the Fiscal Impact section of this report. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Do not authorize the purchase of law enforcement equipment, software, and support, totaling $113,528.80. Staff does not recommend this alternative.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Police Department is requesting the City Council to approve the purchase of the Leica RTC360 laser scanner equipment, software, training and technical support, and software maintenance utilizing $76,730.94 in existing Equipment Replacement Reserve funds and $36,797.86 in Asset Forfeiture revenue funds secured by the County of Riverside. Funding for this purchase will not have an impact on the City’s General Fund in FY 2023/24.

Approval of Revenue and Expenditure Appropriation of Funds:

Description Fund GL Account No. Type
(Rev/Exp)
FY 23/24
Budget
FY 23/24
Proposed
Adjustments
FY 23/24
Amended
Budget
Equipment Replacement
Reserve
Transfer
Out 7510-99-97-88190-901010 Exp $1,870,391 $76,731 $1,947,122 General Fund Transfer
In 1010-99-99-91010-807510 Rev $1,908,082 $76,731 $1,984,813 Asset Forfeiture Revenue
(from County)
Gen.

Fund 1010-60-65-40010-480150 Rev $522,842 $36,798 $559,640 Oper Mtrls – Mach-EquipRepl. Furn & EquipGen.

Fund 1010-60-67-40210-660320 Exp _ $113,529 $113,529

NOTIFICATION
N/A

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Shanna Palau Ken Reichle
Public Safety Contracts Administrator Chief of Police
Concurred By:

Howard Hibbler
Lieutenant

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
I.17
Packet Pg. 342

Public Safety. Provide a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community, control the number and severity of fire and hazardous material incidents, and provide protection for citizens who live, work and visit the City of Moreno Valley.

Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Precision Survey Supply Estimate #32508

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 5/14/24 7:14 AM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 5/14/24 8:44 AM
I.17
Packet Pg. 343
Precision Survey Supply, LLC
8628 Utica Avenue #800
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 US
+19099314040
[email protected]
www.precisionsurveysupply.com
Estimate

ADDRESS
Riverside County Sheriff DeptMoreno Valley
22850 Calle San Juan De los Lagos
Moreno Valley, CA 92553 USA

SHIP TO
Riverside County Sheriff DeptMoreno Valley
22850 Calle San Juan De los Lagos
Moreno Valley, CA 92553 USA
ESTIMATE # DATE
32508 12/04/2023

ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
6012673
RTC360 Scanner Package Consisting of:
1x RTC360 Laser Scanner (838300)
1x RTC360 Transport Container (817063)
4x GEB361 Lithium-Ion Battery (799191)
1x GKL341 Multicharger Professional 5000
(799187)
2x RTC360 USB Flash Drive-256 GB (842065)
1yr RTC360 Laser Scanner CCP Basic (6013561)
1 87,971.65 87,971.65T
842066
GST80, Lightweight Tripod for RTC360 Laser
Scanner
1 2,650.00 2,650.00T
979836
Cyclone REGISTER 360 PLUS Permanent
1 9,750.00 9,750.00T
6018134
Cyclone Register 360 PLUS CCP 1 year
to include:
- Maintenance on Register 360 Software
- Technical Support
- Software Support
- Firmware Upgrades
1 1,805.00 1,805.00
916318
IMS MAP 360 Pro Permanent Edition
Includes Core Service CAD
Includes Animation Component
Includes Point Cloud Edition Service
1 6,400.00 6,400.00T
6015993
IMS Map360 Pro Edition CCP - 1 Year
Includes:
- Technical support for 1 Year
- Product updates for 1 Year
1 1,560.00 1,560.00
PSS32215
On-Site Forensic Training
Accepted By:
1 9,408.00 9,408.00
I.17.a
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Precision Survey Supply Estimate #32508 (6636 : APPROVE USE OF EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND AND ASSET

ACTIVITY QTY RATE AMOUNT
Signature:
4 days total at customer site. Forensic training
manuals provided to attendees.

Maximum class size of 8. Equipment, computers
and facilities provided by
customer. Travel and expenses of the trainer
included.

Square Line Discount
Training discount approved by Sam
1 -2,400.00 -2,400.00
PSS32230
High Definition Scanning External Data Collector
MSI Gaming Series laptop
Windows Home Edition
Intel® Core i7 Processor current Generation Intel
Core

15.6" High Res Display
64GB RAM
6 GB Dedicated Nvidia Video Card
2TB SSD NVMe
2 3,299.00 6,598.00T
Square Line Discount
Laptop Discount approved by Sam
1 -1,000.00 -1,000.00
Trade In
Faro 350S
to Include:

Scanner
Case
Battery
Charger
Adaptor
Tripod
Related Accessories
1 -18,000.00 -18,000.00
Does not include applicable taxes or shipping charges. Thank you! SUBTOTAL 104,742.65 TAX (7.75%) 8,786.15
TOTAL $113,528.80
Accepted By Accepted Date
I.17.a
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Precision Survey Supply Estimate #32508 (6636 : APPROVE USE OF EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND AND ASSET Report to City Council
ID#6635 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Melissa Walker, Public Works Director/City Engineer AGENDA DATE: May 21, 2024
TITLE: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES TO

MULTIPLE CONSULTANTS FOR ON-CALL ENGINEERING

PLAN CHECK SERVICES

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendations:

1. Award Agreements for Professional Services with Charles Abbott Associates, Inc., CValdo Corporation, Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., HR Green Pacific, Inc., Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., and NV5, Inc. to provide on-call Engineering Plan Check Consultant Services to the Land Development Division; and

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute each Agreement with the Plan Check Consultants for the total aggregate not-to-exceed amount of $600,000.00 each year over the entire multi-year term of the Agreements, which include four oneyear extensions, beginning in Fiscal Year 2024/2025, subject to the approval of the City Attorney; and

3. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to issue the related purchase orders to the Plan Check Consultants, including those over $100,000.00 for each consultant and subsequent related purchase orders, including those over $100,000.00, for annual extensions with each consultant, in accordance with the approved terms of the Agreements; and

4. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to make any necessary budget adjustment appropriations related to expenditures and the equal and offsetting revenues; and
I.18
Packet Pg. 346

5. Authorize the City Manager to execute subsequent extensions and/or amendments to the Agreements with the Plan Check Consultants, including the authority to authorize associated purchase orders in accordance with the Agreements terms, subject to the approval of the City Attorney and within the budgetary amounts previously approved by Council as part of the adopted and/or amendment budget process.

SUMMARY
This report recommends approval of separate Agreements for Professional Services with Charles Abbott Associates, Inc., CValdo Corporation, Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., HR Green Pacific, Inc., Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., and NV5, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plan Check Consultants”) who will provide on-call engineering plan check services to the Land Development Division.

Firms were selected following the review and rating of proposals submitted to the City.

The consultants will provide plan check services to ensure timely review of engineering plans. These services are funded through offsetting revenue received from the City’s plan review fees in connection with services requested by developers.

DISCUSSION
To the extent possible, the review of engineering plans and documents will be conducted by in-house City staff. The Plan Check Consultants will assist with project overflow in order to maintain the division’s goal of a timely plan review turn-around.

In March 2024, the Request for Proposal (RFP) for Professional Services for Engineering Plan Check Consultant Services was posted in OpenGov. At the beginning of April 2024, the City received eleven (11) proposals in response to the RFP. Pursuant to the Moreno Valley Municipal Code (Code) procedures for professional services procurement, a selection committee, comprised of City staff, reviewed, and rated all proposals according to the criteria established in the applicable Code section. The following firms were selected to provide engineering plan check consultant services after negotiation of a fair and reasonable price: Charles Abbott Associates, Inc., CValdo Corporation, Engineering Resources of Southern California, Inc., HR Green Pacific, Inc., Interwest Consulting Group, Inc., and NV5, Inc. Due to the high volume of plan submittals, the top six (6) firms were selected for the following reasons:
• The firms indicated a clear understanding of the scope of work, operations, and processes.
• The firms have local experience providing plan check or design services. • The firms discussed quality control measures to ensure delivery of a quality product within the requested plan check turn-around time.

Staff requests that the original Agreements have the option to be extended for four additional one-year terms. As such, staff recommends that, in addition to approving the initial Agreements, the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute subsequent extensions or amendments and authorize the Chief Financial Officer to approve related and subsequent purchase orders, in accordance with the terms of the Agreements and the recommendations authorized by this staff report. Such extensions and amendments I.18
Packet Pg. 347

will only be entered into upon determination that sufficient funding appropriations and program approvals have been granted by the City Council, demonstration by the consultant of having provided satisfactory performance of the services, and mutual agreement by both the City and the consultant to extend the Agreement.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. This alternative helps achieve the Land Development Division goal of a timely plan review turn-around for development projects.

2. Do not approve and do not authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. This alternative will not help achieve the Land Development Division’s goal of a timely plan review turn-around and could cause a delay of development projects through the approval process.

FISCAL IMPACT
The amount of plan check services needed varies depending on the pace of proposed development in the City. Based upon recent trends and the resulting workload, the Land Development Division budget for other professional services (G/L account 1010-70-29- 20410-620299) for FY2024/2025 is $1,567,200.00, which includes other consultant services as well as the engineering plan check consultant services. As such, the total amount for all of the Agreements proposed in this staff report for any one fiscal year would not exceed $600,000.00. The total amount of all Agreements (including any authorized extensions) will be directly limited by the approval of future fiscal year budgets by the City Council.

The amount spent for professional consultant plan check services is funded through offsetting revenue received from the City’s plan review fees in connection with services requested by developers. Therefore, there is no negative impact to the General Fund.

Each plan check consultant receives compensation equal to 65% of the adopted City Land Development Division (LDD) fee for all improvement related plan checks and 75% of the adopted City LDD fee for final and parcel map plan checks. It is recommended that any necessary future budget adjustment appropriations be made related to the expenditures and the equal and offsetting revenues.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of the Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Zara Terrell Melissa Walker, P.E.

Management Analyst Public Works Director/City Engineer
Concurred By: Concurred By:

Clement Jimenez, P.E. Harold Zamora, P.E.

Principal Engineer Engineering Division Manager/Assistant City Engineer I.18
Packet Pg. 348

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Public Facilities and Capital Projects. Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc.

2. Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp

3. Consultant Agreement - ERSC

4. Consultant Agreement - HR Green

5. Consultant Agreement - Interwest

6. Consultant Agreement - NV5

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 5/12/24 1:26 PM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 5/13/24 9:02 AM
I.18
Packet Pg. 349
I.18.a
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.a
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Charles Abbott Assoc. (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL I.18.b
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.b
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - CValdo Corp (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.c
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - ERSC (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.d
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - HR Green (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.e
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - Interwest (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT I.18.f
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Consultant Agreement - NV5 (6635 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AGREEMENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Report to City Council
ID#6628 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Melissa Walker, Public Works Director/City Engineer AGENDA DATE: May 21, 2024
TITLE: AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES TO
MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL, INC. FOR STATE
ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 801 0064

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommendation:

1. Award an Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. to provide professional consultant design services for the State Route 60/Redlands Boulevard Interchange Improvements project;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc., subject to the approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorize the issuance of a Purchase Order to Michael Baker International, Inc., funded by Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program funds (Fund 3003), in the amount of $2,231,876.31 when the Agreement has been signed by all parties; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent Amendments to the Agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. within the City Council approved annual budgeted amounts, including the authority to authorize the associated purchase orders in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

SUMMARY
This report recommends approval of an agreement with Michael Baker International, Inc. to complete the preliminary design phase for the State Route 60/Redlands I.19
Packet Pg. 567

Boulevard Interchange Improvements project, including environmental documentation and right of way engineering work as required. The project would provide new interchange bridge and freeway ramps to enhance safety and improve traffic flow on State Route 60 and Redlands Boulevard. The design of this project is funded by the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program funds.

DISCUSSION
The State Route 60/Redlands Boulevard Interchange Improvements project would provide various improvements for the existing interchanges that include enhanced geometrics with new bridge height to meet vertical clearance standards; enhanced freeway access and regional goods movements; improved traffic operations to support the forecast traffic demand for future growth of the City and the region; and a multimodal facility that has harmony with the community and preserves the value of the area. Recognizing the need for these improvements, Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Executive Committee has approved a budget from the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program Funds for completing the preliminary design phase and made it available for the City to implement this phase through a cooperative agreement executed by both agencies.

Staff advertised the request for proposals on its e-procurement portal OpenGov.com in accordance with City’s procurement processes in early April 2024. The City received five (5) proposals in response to the RFP on May 9, 2024. Following a competitive proposal review and selection process, Michael Baker International, Inc. was selected as the most qualified consultant to perform the work. The selection process was pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code requirements for professional services procurement. Staff recommends the award of a contract with Michael Baker International, Inc. to complete the preliminary design of this project. This allows the project to be more competitive for grant funding.

The consultant’s scope of services includes completing site survey and assessment, traffic and other engineering studies and analyses, geometric design and alternative evaluation, environmental documentation, right of way engineering, and project report in accordance with City’s and Caltrans’ requirements. If additional funding becomes available and at the City’s option, the City may continue utilizing Michael Baker International, Inc. for completing final design with plans, specifications, and estimates and related work subject to consultant’s work performance and ability to complete the project on time and within budget.

This project is consistent with Objective 4 of the Momentum MoVal Strategic Plan: “Manage and maximize Moreno Valley’s public infrastructure to ensure an excellent quality of life, develop and implement innovative, cost-effective infrastructure maintenance programs, public facilities management strategies, and capital improvement programming and project delivery.”

ALTERNATIVES
I.19
Packet Pg. 568

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. This alternative will allow the City to move forward and complete the preliminary design of the project. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Do not approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. This alternative will not allow the preliminary design of this project to be completed, which inevitably will delay the timeliness and increase the cost of much needed improvements at the referenced interchange. Staff does not recommend this alternative.

FISCAL IMPACT
The design of this project is funded by the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program. There is no impact to the General Fund.

AVAILABLE BUDGET:

Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee TUMF
(Account No. 3003-70-77-80001) (Project No. 801 0064-3003) …………… $2,800,000 ESTIMATED COST FOR PRELIMINARY DESIGN:

Consultant Design Contract with Michael Baker International, Inc.……….…$2,231,877 City Project Administration ……………………………………….………………... $80,000 Total Cost…………………………………………..………………………………$2,311,877
ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE:

Complete Preliminary Engineering Design…………..………………..…………Fall 2026

NOTIFICATION
Publication of the Request for Proposals and Council Meeting Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Quang Nguyen, P.E. Melissa Walker, P.E.

Capital Projects Principal Engineer Public Works Director/City Engineer Concurred By:

Harold Zamora, P.E.

Engineering Division Engineer/Assistant City Engineer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Public Safety. Provide a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community, control the number and severity of fire and hazardous material incidents, and provide protection for citizens who live, work and visit the City of Moreno Valley.

Public Facilities and Capital Projects. Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

I.19
Packet Pg. 569

Positive Environment. Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs

ATTACHMENTS
To view large attachments, please click your “bookmarks” on the left hand side of this document for the necessary attachment.

1. Location Map

2. Consultant Agreement

APPROVALS
Budget Officer Approval ✓ Approved . 5/12/24 1:05 PM
City Attorney Approval ✓ Approved .

City Manager Approval ✓ Approved . 5/13/24 9:00 AM
I.19
Packet Pg. 570
I.19.a
Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Location Map (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES TO 1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR
STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 801 0064
This Agreement (hereinafter, this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of _____________, 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Moreno Valley, a municipal corporation in the County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” and Michael Baker International, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Consultant.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City has determined it is in the public interest to proceed with professional consultant design services related to the Project Authorization and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design (Base Services) for State Route 60/Redlands Blvd. Interchange Improvements hereinafter described as "Project"; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined the Project involves the performance of professional and technical services of a temporary nature as more specifically described in Exhibit "A" (City's Request for Proposal) and Exhibit "B" (Consultant's Proposal) hereto; and WHEREAS, the City does not have available employees to perform the services for the Project and has requested the Consultant to perform such services for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Consultant is professionally qualified in California to perform the professional and technical services required for the Project, and hereby represents that it desires to and is professionally and legally capable of performing the services called for by this Agreement;
THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant, for the consideration hereinafter described, mutually agree as follows:

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

1. The Project is described as STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS – PROJECT NO. 801 0064.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

2. The Consultant's scope of service is described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict, the City's Request for Proposal shall take precedence over the Consultant's Proposal.

3. The City's responsibility is described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

PAYMENT TERMS

4. The City agrees to pay the Consultant and the Consultant agrees to receive a "Notto-Exceed" fee of $2,231,876.31 in accordance with the payment terms provided on Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

TIME FOR PERFORMANCE

5. The Consultant shall commence services upon receipt of written direction to proceed from the City.

6. The Consultant shall perform the work described on Exhibit "A" in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

7. (a) This Agreement shall be effective from effective date and shall continue in full force and effect date through December 30, 2026 , subject to any earlier termination in accordance with this Agreement. The services of Consultant shall be completed in a sequence assuring expeditious completion, but in any event, all such services shall be completed prior to expiration of this Agreement.
(b) Non-Performance Damages/Penalties. The Consultant have agreed to nonI.19.b Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
3 performance damages/penalties with respect to Consultant’s failure to complete the Project within the Agreement Time intervals and/or frequencies as set forth in this Agreement and/or in the Scope of Work, or as directed by the City. For each of the categories set forth hereinabove, the penal sum of 1% of the total contract/agreement amount per working day will be assessed for each working day the deficiencies remain uncorrected. If non-performance damages/penalties are to be assessed, the Consultant will be notified immediately by written email, letter, or by telephone. The Consultant will not be assessed non-performance damage/penalties for delays caused by the City or are deemed outside the Consultant’s control by the City.

Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that the amount of such non-performance damages/penalties are impossible to ascertain as of the date of execution hereof and have agreed to such non-performance damages/penalties to fix the City's damages and to avoid later disputes. It is understood and agreed by Consultant that non-performance damages/penalties payable pursuant to this Agreement and that such amounts are not manifestly unreasonable under the circumstances existing as of the date of execution of this Agreement.

It is further mutually agreed that the City will have the right to deduct non-performance damages/penalties against progress payments or retainage and that the City will issue a Change Order and reduce the Agreement Price accordingly. In the event the remaining unpaid Agreement Price is insufficient to cover the full amount of non-performance damages/penalties, Consultant shall pay the difference to the City.

City may at any time deduct non-performance damages/penalties as are payable hereunder from money due or to become due to Consultant, or pursue any other legal remedy to collect such non-performance damages/penalties from Consultant and/or its Insurance, Surety, etc. Neither the City's failure or delay in deducting non-performing damages/penalties I.19.b
Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
4 from payments otherwise due Consultant, nor City's failure or delay in notifying Consultant of the accrual of non-performance damages/penalties, shall be deemed a waiver of City's right to non-performance damages/penalties.

City's rights under this Section shall not be interpreted as precluding or limiting: (i) any right or remedy of City arising from an event of Consultant default other than a failure to complete the Project within the Agreement Time; or (ii) City's right to order an acceleration, at Consultant’s expense, of performance of the Project to overcome delay, including, without limitation, a delay for which City has the right to assess and/or accrue non-performance damages/penalties. The availability of non-performance damages/penalties shall not limit City's right to terminate the Consultant’s performance and accrual and/or assessment of non-performance damages/penalties does not constitute a waiver of such rights.

8. (a) The Consultant agrees that the personnel, including the principal Project Manager, and all subconsultants assigned to the Project by the Consultant, shall be subject to the prior approval of the City.
(b) No change in subconsultants or key personnel shall be made by the Consultant without written prior approval of the City.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

9. It is understood and agreed that the Consultant is, and at all times shall be, an independent consultant and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the Consultant or any individual whose compensation for services is paid by the Consultant, an agent or employee of the City, or authorizing the Consultant to create or assume any obligation or liability for or on behalf of the City.

10. The Consultant may also retain or subcontract for the services of other necessary consultants with the prior written approval of the City. Payment for such services shall be the I.19.b
Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
5 responsibility of the Consultant. Any and all subconsultants employed by the Consultant shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, except that the City shall have no obligation to pay any subconsultant for services rendered on the Project.

11. The Consultant and the City agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective services under this Agreement.

12. The Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws in the performance of work under this Agreement.

13. To the extent required by controlling federal, state and local law, Consultant shall not employ discriminatory practices in the provision of services, employment of personnel, or in any other respect on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Subject to the foregoing and during the performance of this Agreement, Consultant agrees as follows:
(a) Consultant will comply with all applicable laws and regulations providing that no person shall, on the grounds of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity made possible by or resulting from this Agreement. (b) Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Consultant shall ensure that applicants are employed, and the employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, I.19.b
Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
6 religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Such requirement shall apply to Consultant’s employment practices including, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this nondiscrimination clause.
(c) Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of Consultant in pursuit hereof, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. (d) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall cause each subconsultant to also comply with the requirements of this Section 13.

14. Indemnification.

(a) Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 2782.8, in performing “design professional services” as defined in Section 2782.8, the Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent, reckless, or I.19.b
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
7 willful misconduct in the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant under this RFP and/or related Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees; and does not apply to any passive negligence of City unless caused at least in part by Consultant.
(b) Non-Design Professional Services. For all non-design professional services, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant, or are caused or claim to be caused by the acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.
(c) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each subconsultant to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph. (d) CalPERS Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, in addition to I.19.b
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
8 obligations set forth in this section, in the event that any person providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of the City, to the fullest extent of the law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any costs and expenses incurred by City, including without limitation, payment that City is required as a result to make to CalPERS, whether in the form of employee and/or employer contributions, taxes, or any similar obligations, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest.

15. CalPERS Participation. As set forth in this Agreement and in the Request for Qualifications, City has an obligation to treat all persons working for or under the direction of Consultant as an independent Consultant of City and agents and employees of Consultant, and not as agents or employees of City. Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that City participates in a defined benefit plan (“CalPERS”), and that it is possible that CalPERS may find that persons providing services pursuant to this Agreement are employees of City and should be registered with the CalPERS as employees of City.

16. CalPERS Retiree Disclosure. Consultant hereby expressly agrees to clearly and conspicuously disclose to City in writing any and all persons working for Consultant who are retirees under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) whom receives a monthly CalPERS retirement allowance, and whom are, subject to City approval, assigned by Consultant to provide services to City under the Agreement, prior to such person performing any services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted to limit a CalPERS retiree’s obligations under applicable law, rules or regulations.

Joint Cooperation. In the event that CalPERS initiates an inquiry that includes examination of whether individuals providing services under this Agreement to City are City’s employees, Consultant shall within five days and share all communications and documents from I.19.b
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
9 CalPERS that it may legally share. In the event that either Consultant or City files an appeal or court challenge, Consultant and City each agree to cooperate with each other in responding to the inquiry and any subsequent administrative appeal or court challenge of an adverse determination.

This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

17. Insurance.
(a) Throughout the life of this Agreement, Consultant shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all insurance as required in Exhibit “E” or as may be authorized in writing by the City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. (b) If at any time during the life of the Agreement or any extension, Consultant or any of its subconsultant fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all services and work under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Consultant shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Agreement. No action taken by City pursuant to this section shall in any way relieve Consultant of its responsibilities under this Agreement.

The phrase “fail to maintain any required insurance” shall include, without limitation, notification received by City that an insurer has commenced proceedings, or has had proceedings commenced against it, indicating that the insurer is insolvent. (c) The fact that insurance is obtained by Consultant shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Consultant, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act I.19.b
Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
10 as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Consultant. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Consultant, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Consultant, vendors, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub-consultants, subconsultants or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.
(d) Upon request of City, Consultant shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Agreement, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. (e) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each subconsultant to provide insurance protection in favor of City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of this section, except that any required certificates and applicable endorsements shall be on file with Consultant and City prior to the commencement of any services by the subconsultant.

18. The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement. No provisions of this Agreement may be waived unless in writing and signed by all parties to this Agreement. Waiver of any one provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision herein.

19. Consultant and subconsultants shall pay prevailing wage rates when required by the Labor Laws of the State of California. Consultant and all of Consultant’s subcontractors, if any, shall pay each employee engaged in all applicable trades or occupation not less than the prevailing hourly wage rate for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work I.19.b
Packet Pg. 581 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
11 is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 of the California Labor Code (“Labor Code”), the Director of Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rates of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, and subsistence pay as provided for in Labor Code Section 1773.8, apprenticeship or other training programs authorized by Labor Code Section 3093 and similar purposes applicable to the work to be done. Said wages are available through the California Department of Industrial Relations’ Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/PWD/index.htm and are on file at City Hall, as provided in Section 1773.2 of the Labor Code. Said rates shall be posted at the Project site where work is to be performed, in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.2. Consultant shall access a copy of the wage rate determination and shall make all subcontractors, if any, aware of the determination. As the wage determination for each craft reflects an expiration date, it shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to ensure that the prevailing wage rates of concern are current and paid. Subject to the safe harbor provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, Consultant shall forfeit to the City an amount not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof, as set by the Labor Commissioner in accordance with the terms of Labor Code section 1775, for each laborer, workmen or mechanics employed that is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein referred to and stipulated for any work done under the proposed contract, by him, or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code, and in particular, Sections 1770 to 1781 inclusive. Consultant and any and all or its subcontractors shall forfeit to the City twenty-five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in I.19.b
Packet Pg. 582 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
12 any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Section 1813 of the Labor Code. In the event the total cost of the Project is thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00) or more, Consultant shall further comply with provisions set forth in Labor Code Section 1777.5 pertaining to employment of properly registered apprentices, including without limitation the obligation to (i) pay employed apprentices the prevailing rate of per diem wages for apprentices in the trade to which he or she is registered and shall be employed only at the work of craft or trade to which he or she is registered; (ii) employ apprentices in at least the ratio as set forth in said section; (iii) submit contract award information to an applicable apprenticeship program; and (iv) contribute to California Apprenticeship Council.

Consultant and all subcontractors hired to perform any work under the Project shall keep accurate payroll records, including the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each worker, in accordance with Section 1776 of the Labor Code. Payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”) or in a manner containing the same information as the forms provided by the DLSE. Failure to comply with the above may result in monetary penalties to the Consultant or affected subcontractor. Payroll records shall be verified by written declaration made under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in the records is true and correct. Consultant and any and all subcontractors shall make a certified copy of all payroll records available for inspection by DLSE, the City or any member of the public and otherwise provide certified copies of such records to any of the foregoing within ten (10) days of Consultant’s and subcontractor’s receipt of written request therefor. Failure to comply with the above may result in monetary penalties, in accordance with Labor Code Section 1776(d) and (h).

Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary, Consultant hereby acknowledges that all I.19.b
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
13 contractors and subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“Department”) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 in order to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any public work contract, including this Agreement, that is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. The Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. In accordance with Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Consultant must secure payment of compensation to all Consultant’s employees.

Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant is registered with the Department in the manner prescribed by the Department and has paid the requisite application fee, as required by Labor Code Section 1725.5. Moreover, prior to Consultant entering into any contracts with any subcontractor, Consultant shall obtain proof that all such subcontractors have also registered with the Department in accordance with Section 1725.5.

20. (a) The Consultant shall deliver to the Public Works Director/City Engineer of the City or his designated representative, fully completed and detailed project-related documents which shall become the property of the City. The Consultant may retain, for its files, copies of any and all material, including drawings, documents, and specifications, produced by the Consultant in performance of this Agreement.
(b) The Consultant shall be entitled to copies of all furnished materials for his files and his subconsultants, if any.
(c) The City agrees to hold the Consultant free and harmless from any claim arising from any unauthorized use of computations, maps, and other documents prepared or provided by the Consultant under this Agreement, if used by the City on other work without the permission of the Consultant. Consultant acknowledges that Consultant work product produced I.19.b
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
14 under this agreement may be public record under State law.

21. (a) This Agreement shall terminate without any liability of City to Consultant upon the earlier of: (i) Consultant’s filing for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or any bankruptcy petition or petition for receiver commenced by a third party against Consultant; (ii) 10 calendar days prior written notice with or without cause by City to Consultant; (iii) City’s nonappropriation of funds sufficient to meet its obligations hereunder during any City fiscal year of this Agreement, or insufficient funding for the Project; or (iv) expiration of this Agreement. The written notice shall specify the date of termination. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant may continue services on the project through the date of termination, provided that no service(s) shall be commenced or continued after receipt of the notice, which is not intended to protect the interest of the City. The City shall pay the Consultant within thirty (30) days after the date of termination for all non-objected to services performed by the Consultant in accordance herewith through the date of termination. Consultant shall not be paid for any work or services performed or costs incurred which reasonably could have been avoided. (b) In the event of termination due to failure of Consultant to satisfactorily perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, City may withhold an amount that would otherwise be payable as an offset to, but not in excess of, City’s damages caused by such failure. In no event shall any payment by City pursuant to this Agreement constitute a waiver by City of any breach of this Agreement which may then exist on the part of Consultant, nor shall such payment impair or prejudice any remedy available to City with respect to the breach. (c) Upon any breach of this Agreement by Consultant, City may (i) exercise any right, remedy (in contract, law or equity), or privilege which may be available to it under applicable laws of the State of California or any other applicable law; (ii) proceed by appropriate court action to enforce the terms of the Agreement; and/or (iii) recover all direct, indirect, consequential, I.19.b
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
15 economic and incidental damages for the breach of the Agreement. If it is determined that City improperly terminated this Agreement for default, such termination shall be deemed a termination for convenience.
(d) Consultant shall be liable for default unless nonperformance is caused by an occurrence beyond the reasonable control of Consultant and without its fault or negligence such as, acts of God or the public enemy, acts of City in its contractual capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, unusually severe weather, and delays of common carriers. Consultant shall notify City in writing as soon as it is reasonably possible after the commencement of any excusable delay, setting forth the full particulars in connection therewith, and shall remedy such occurrence with all reasonable dispatch, and shall promptly give written notice to Administrator of the cessation of such occurrence.

22. This Agreement is binding upon the City and the Consultant and their successors and assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, sublet, or transfer its interest in this Agreement or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the other.

23. A City representative shall be designated by the City and a Consultant representative shall be designated by the Consultant. The City representative and the Consultant representative shall be the primary contact person for each party regarding performance of this Agreement. The City representative shall cooperate with the Consultant, and the Consultant's representative shall cooperate with the City in all matters regarding this Agreement and in such a manner as will result in the performance of the services in a timely and expeditious fashion.

24. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant, and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or Agreements, either I.19.b
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
16 written or oral. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a subsequent written Agreement signed by both parties.

25. Where the payment terms provide for compensation on a time and materials basis, the Consultant shall maintain adequate records to permit inspection and audit of the Consultant's time and materials charges under this Agreement. The Consultant shall make such records available to the City at the Consultant's office during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. Nothing herein shall convert such records into public records. Except as may be otherwise required by law, such records will be available only to the City. Such records shall be maintained by the Consultant for three (3) years following completion of the services under this Agreement.

26. The City and the Consultant agree, that to the extent permitted by law, until final approval by the City, all data shall be treated as confidential and will not be released to third parties without the prior written consent of both parties.

27. (a) Consultant shall comply, and require its subconsultants to comply, with all applicable (i) professional canons and requirements governing avoidance of impermissible client conflicts; and (ii) federal, state and local conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, California Government Code Section 1090 et. seq., the California Political Reform Act (California Government Code Section 87100 et. seq.) and the regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission concerning disclosure and disqualification (2 California Code of Regulations Section 18700 et. seq.). At any time, upon written request of City, Consultant shall provide a written opinion of its legal counsel and that of any subconsultant that, after a due diligent inquiry, Consultant and the respective subconsultant(s) are in full compliance with all laws and regulations. Consultant shall take, and require its subconsultants to take, reasonable steps to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest. Upon discovery of any facts giving rise I.19.b
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
17 to the appearance of a conflict of interest, Consultant shall immediately notify City of these facts in writing.
(b) In performing the work or services to be provided hereunder, Consultant shall not employ or retain the services of any person while such person either is employed by City or is a member of any City council, commission, board, committee, or similar City body.

This requirement may be waived in writing by the City Manager, if no actual or potential conflict is involved.
(c) Consultant represents and warrants that it has not paid or agreed to pay any compensation, contingent or otherwise, direct or indirect, to solicit or procure this Agreement or any rights/benefits hereunder.
(d) Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s subconsultants performing any services on this Project, shall bid for, assist anyone in the preparation of a bid for, or perform any services pursuant to, any other contract in connection with this Project unless fully disclosed to and approved by the City Manager, in advance and in writing. Consultant and any of its subconsultants shall have no interest, direct or indirect, in any other contract with a third party in connection with this Project unless such interest is in accordance with all applicable law and fully disclosed to and approved by the City Manager, in advance and in writing. Notwithstanding any approval given by the City Manager under this provision, Consultant shall remain responsible for complying with Section 25(a), above.
(e) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed or services to be provided under this Agreement, Consultant shall include the provisions of this Section 25 in each subcontract and require its subconsultants to comply therewith.
(f) This Section 25 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
18 28. All Plans, drawings, Specifications, reports, logs, and other documents prepared by the Consultant in its performance under this Agreement shall, upon completion of the project, be delivered to and be the property of the City, provided that the Consultant shall be entitled, at its own expense, to make copies thereof for its own use.

29. The laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement, and shall also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Venue shall be vested in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside.

30. Consultant expressly waives any and all rights and benefits conferred upon it by the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which reads as follows:
“A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.” _____
Initials
This waiver shall be effective as a bar to any and all actions, fees, damages, losses, claims, liabilities and demands of whatsoever character, nature and kind that are known or unknown, or suspected or unsuspected, including, without limitation, claims of entitlements under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) that are only afforded to employees and not independent contractors. Consultant further represents and warrants that it understands this waiver and that if it does not understand this waiver, it shall seek the advice of a qualified attorney before executing this Agreement.

31. The Consultant shall comply with the supplementary Federal provisions described on Exhibit F (Supplemental General Conditions) and Exhibit G (Caltrans Supplementary I.19.b
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0064
19 Conditions) attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

32. Authority To Execute. The representative executing this Agreement on behalf of each party hereby represents and warrants that he or she has full power and authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of such party and that all approvals and other actions necessary in connection with the effective execution by him or her have been obtained and are in full force and effect as of his or her execution hereof.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties have each caused their authorized representative to execute this Agreement.

City of Moreno Valley Michael Baker International, Inc.

BY: BY:

Mike Lee, City Manager
Name:

Date TITLE:
(President or Vice President)

Date

BY:

Name:

TITLE:
(Corporate Secretary)

Date

Enclosures: Exhibit “A” – City Scope of Services
Exhibit “B” – Consultant Proposal
Exhibit “C” – City Services
Exhibit “D” – Terms of Payment
Exhibit “E” – Insurance Requirements

INTERNAL USE ONLY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:

City Attorney

Date
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Public Works Director/City Engineer

Date
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT EXHIBIT “A”

CITY SCOPE OF SERVICES
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
2024-016

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE
ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE
IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
RELEASE DATE: April 9, 2024
DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS: April 29, 2024
RESPONSE DEADLINE: May 9, 2024, 5:00 pm
RESPONSES MUST BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO:

Exhibit "A"
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
2 https://secure.procurenow.com/portal/morenovalley
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT City of Moreno Valley

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064

1. NOTICE TO BIDDERS.................................................................................

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND SCOPE OF SERVICES...................................

3. GENERAL INFORMATION..........................................................................

4. PROPOSAL CONTENT................................................................................

5. PROSPECTIVE BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS...................................................

6. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS....................................................................

7. EVALUATION AND RANKING OF PROPOSALS ...........................................

8. AWARD AND PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT................................................

9. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ...........................................................

10. LABOR LAWS, PREVAILING WAGE ............................................................

11.Vendor Questionnaire................................................................................

Attachments:

A - Attachment A - Location Map
B - Attachment B - PSR-PDS SR60/Redlands Interchange
C - Attachment C - Storm Water Data Report - SR60/Redlands Interchange D - Attachment D - Sample Consultant Agreement
E - Attachment E - Caltrans Exhibit 10-R Sample AE Contract Language F - Attachment F - Caltrans Exhibit 10-O1 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment G - Attachment G - Non-Collusion_Declaration
H - Attachment H - Caltrans Exhibit 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities I - Attachment I - Insurance Requirements
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
4 1. NOTICE TO BIDDERS

1.1. Summary
The City of Moreno Valley is seeking a Professional Consultant to provide design services for the State Route 60/Redlands Boulevard Interchange Improvements Project.

You are hereby invited to submit a proposal for providing Professional Consultant Services to complete Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design for the State Route 60 (SR-60) and Redlands Boulevard Interchange, as well as "optional services" to complete Plans, Specifications, Estimate (PSE) Phase and Right of Way Acquisition task, for the Capital Projects Division. Consultants who are interested in proposing should anticipate to provide full service with extensive coordination with Caltrans and complete the work on time per proposed schedule and within budget per contract and amendments, if any.

Each bidder is hereby informed that proposals and its contents are subject to disclosure in accordance with the California Public Records Act (California Government Code Sections 7920 et seq.).

1.2. Background
Moreno Valley was incorporated in 1984 as a General Law City, merging the communities of Moreno, Sunnymead, and Edgemont. The City operates under a Council-Manager form of government. The City Council is comprised of an elected Mayor and four Council Members elected by district. The City has a committed customer-service oriented workforce comprised of more than 450 employees who provide a wide-range of municipal services including Public Works, Economic Development, Community Development, Parks and Community Services, Financial and Management Services and Library services. The City contracts with Riverside County for Police and Fire services.

1.3. Timeline
Due Dates and RFP-Contract Award Schedule
The Request for Proposal (RFP) release, proposal review and consultant selection processes that leads to the award of a contract for the requested services are anticipated to be completed per the following schedule:

RFP Release Date April 9, 2024
Questions & Answer Deadline April 29, 2024, 5:00pm
Proposal Due Date May 9, 2024, 5:00pm
Selection / Evaluation May 13, 2024
Interviews (if deemed necessary) May 14, 2024
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
5 Design Contract Award May 21, 2024
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
6 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND SCOPE OF SERVICES

2.1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The SR-60/Redlands Boulevard interchange was constructed in 1964. The existing interchange consists of the Redlands Boulevard overcrossing with eastbound and westbound entrance and exit ramps. Both ramp intersections are signalized. The entrance ramps are currently not metered. The Redlands Boulevard overcrossing (PM 20.37, Bridge Number 56-0487) has four spans, with precast girders that are simply supported by two-column bents and open-ended diaphragm abutments. The bents and abutments are on Cast in Drilled Hole (CIDH) piles. The bridge is approximately 236 feet long, 34 feet wide, and spans four through lanes and both entrance ramps on SR- 60.

The purpose of the project is to alleviate congestion, enhance freeway access and regional goods movement, provide increased interchange capacity, improve traffic operations to support the forecast travel demand for the 2050 design year; improve existing interchange geometric including bridge height to meet Caltrans standards; and accommodate a multimodal facility that has harmony with the community and preserves the value of the area.

In June 2016, a Project Study Report - Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) was completed ad approved by Caltrans. Various improvements to the interchange were proposed which include, but are not limited to: 1) reconstruction and realignment of SR 60/Redlands Blvd ramps, 2) widening of Redlands Blvd, and replacement of the overcrossing structure, 3) realignment of Spruce Street on the north side of SR-op60 @ Redlands Boulevard, 4) provision for California Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement areas as required, 5) addition of ramp metering as required, 6) provision for truck operations, 7) coordination of utility relocations, 8) provision for landscaping and irrigation, and/or hardscape, to the extent required, and 9) related improvements as required by the City and Caltrans. Improvements along Redlands Boulevard that are consistent with the City General Plan, the Circulation Plan, Bike and Trail Master Plans, Master Drainage Plan, and any other applicable local and regional planning plans, are also considered to be included n this project.

2.2. SCOPE OF PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
The consultant scope of services is to provide full service, task management, scheduling and meeting, and coordination with Caltrans and other agencies to complete the Project Authorization and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design with the approved Project Report in accordance with Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual. The City anticipates limited funding may become available for implementing the Plans, Specifications, Estimate (PSE) Phase of the project in the coming fiscal years. Interested consultants are requested to include optional services and associated fees in their proposals to complete the PSE Phase in response to this solicitation. The City reserves the right to negotiate the scope of services and amend the selected consultant's contract to add these optional PSE Phase services if funding becomes available and if it's in the best interest of the City to complete the design of the project.

Base Services: The scope of services for completing Project Authorization and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design include, but are not limited to, the following tasks:

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
7 1. Draft Project Report (project scoping, scheduling, funding, traffic study and analysis, intersection evaluation control/highway safety manual analysis, traffic operation analysis, geometric alternative analysis and selection, and others as required.)

2. Preliminary Engineering Studies (alternatives geometric plans, typical sections, storm water and drainage assessment, utility assessment, preliminary transportation management plan data sheets, preliminary geotechnical investigation, preliminary foundation and materials analysis, structure advance planning study, conceptual bridge architecture, right of way data sheets, preliminary landscape and aesthetics plan, preliminary cost estimate, life cycle cost analysis, conceptual construction phasing plan, and others as required.)

3. Design Standard Decision Documentation (fact sheets for exceptions to design standards, and others as required.)

4. Draft Environmental Document (for both NEPA and CEQA processes) (purpose and need, area of potential effects map, water quality assessment report, noise study, noise abatement decision, visual impact assessment, floodplain and farmland technical memorandum, draft relocation impact statement, air quality analysis, paleontological identification and evaluation, archeological survey, historical property survey and evaluation, jurisdiction delineation, natural environment study, draft initial study screen check, tribal consultation, hazardous waste and lead deposit evaluation, draft initial study/environmental assessment, environmental documentation circulation, and others as required.)

5. Public Outreach (prepare public meeting materials and invitation, conduct public meetings, and others as required.)

6. Final Environmental Document and Final Project Report (respond to public comments, preferred alternative selection, complete environmental document, complete project report, notice of determination/availability filing, environmental mitigation and permitting, resource agency/clean water act/California fish and game permitting, geometric approval drawing, complete all design mapping and survey, photogrammetric survey, right of way mapping, and others as required.)
Optional Services: The scope of services for completing Plans, Specifications, Estimate (PSE) Phase and Right of Way Acquisition include, but are not limited to, the following tasks:

1. Complete 35% Design Level (plans, specifications, estimates, and other documents with authorization from Caltrans to proceed to 65% PSE.)

2. Complete 65% Design Level (landscape and aesthetic plan, bridge site data, bridge type selection, storm water and drainage report, transportation management plan data sheet, geotechnical design and report, supplemental fact sheet for exceptions to design standards, draft roadway plan, draft drainage plan, draft utility plan, draft stage construction/traffic I.19.b
Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
8 handling plan, draft traffic plan, draft highway planting plan, draft electrical plan, draft structure plan, special provisions, cost estimate, and others as required.)

3. Complete 95% Design Level (update all reports, update roadway plan, update structure plan, update special provisions, update cost estimate, and others as required.)

4. Complete 100% Design Level Ready-to-List (final roadway plan, final structure plan, final special provisions and bidding document, final cost estimate, resident engineer documentation, and others as required.)

5. Complete Right of Way and Appraisal Document (right of way requirements map, appraisal map, legal descriptions, right of way map, and others as required.)

6. Complete Right of Way Acquisition (acquisition coordination, acquisition documentation, right of way certification, utility coordination and notices, utility relocation, and others as required.)

2.3. PROJECT FUNDING AND SCHEDULE
The project receives funding from the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) for the Project Authorization and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design. TUMF Program is a regional fee program designed to provide transportation and transit infrastructure that mitigates the impact of new growth in Western Riverside County. All work related to this project shall be subject to the terms and conditions as included in the TUMF Funding Agreement executed by and between WRCOG and the City. Additional TUMF funding may become available for implementing the Plans, Specifications, Estimate (PSE) Phase and Right of Way Acquisition in the coming fiscal years which could allow the project to move forward.

Proposals must be submitted electronically via the City of Moreno Valley e-Procurement System, OpenGov, before the Due Date and Time as shown on Section 1.3 of this RFP.

The City intends to have the Project Authorization and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design completed expeditiously to meet funding requirements while making the project more advantageously eligible for grant funding. Consultant is strongly encouraged to carefully evaluate the project and scope of work for opportunities to accelerate the work and shorten the delivery schedule. This would require the Consultant to perform extensive coordination and work closely with the City, Caltrans, utilities, regulatory agencies, and other stakeholders to keep project moving.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
9 3. GENERAL INFORMATION
Proposals must be submitted electronically via the City of Moreno Valley e-Procurement System, OpenGov, before the Due Date and Time as shown on Section 1.3 of this RFP, at:
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/morenovalley
The proposer shall provide a separate file for technical proposal and a separate file for cost proposal. (Note: Cost proposals will not be opened during the review and rating of the technical proposals. Once the consultant ranking is made and top-ranked consultant is identified, only the cost proposal of the topranked consultant will be opened for review and contract negotiation purposes.) Unless otherwise specified, proposals submitted by any other method such as hard copy, fax, or e-mail will be disqualified.

Proposals may be withdrawn on the OpenGov vendor portal prior to the scheduled submittal time and date for receipt of proposals.

Prospective bidder's are encouraged to not wait until deadline to submit proposals, as system-related questions may arise.

All questions, technical, commercial, or contractual in nature shall be directed to the Questions & Answers Section on the e-Procurement System, OpenGov. No phone calls will be allowed. Contact of the City of Moreno Valley personnel directly regarding this RFP is prohibited and may be grounds for elimination from the selection process. All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted through OpenGov no later than the Questions & Answers Deadline as shown on Section 1.3 of this RFP.

Bidders experiencing any technical difficulties with the bid submission process may contact OpenGov at (650) 336-7167 or utilize the chat bubble in the system. Neither the City, nor OpenGov, makes any guarantee as to the timely availability of assistance, or assurance that any given problem will be resolved by the bid submission deadline.

Right to Reject Proposals: City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any non-material irregularities or informalities in any proposal, and to accept or reject any item or combination of items.

Execution of Agreement: If a prospective bidder is not able to execute an agreement within 10 days after being notified of selection, City reserves the right to select the next most qualified bidder or call for new proposals, whichever City deems most appropriate. (Sample template of agreement is attached).

Incorporation of RFP/Proposal: This RFP and the firm’s response, including all promises, warranties, commitments, and representations made in the successful proposal will become binding contractual obligations and will be incorporated by reference in any agreement between City and prospective bidder.

Authorized Signatories: Company personnel signing the cover letter of the proposal, or any other related forms submitted must be authorized signers with the requisite authority to represent their firm and to enter into binding contracts.

Validity of Proposals: Proposed services and related pricing contained in the proposal must be valid for a period of 120 Calendar Days after the due date.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
10 4. PROPOSAL CONTENT
The Consultant’s Proposal shall be no more than 30 pages, excluding executive summary, resumes, dividers, and certificates. Proposals failing to provide sufficient information and assurances of performance to accurately assess each category of the required services and failing to comply with requirements and conditions of the RFP will not be given further consideration.

4.1. Executive Summary
The Consultant shall include an executive summary with general firm’s information including full legal name and contact information, organizational structure (corporation, LLC, etc.), name(s) and title(s) of the principal owner(s), person(s) authorized to make commitments for your company identified in the corporate resolution, firm history and length of relevant experience, and current number of employees with emphasis on key personnel. The executive summary shall be limited to a maximum of one page.

4.2. Technical Proposal
The Consultant shall include, but not be limited to, the following items in the body of the proposal:

A. Proposer’s approach and understanding of all necessary tasks and steps involved in completing the required services.

B. Responses with sufficient detail to enable City to evaluate your understanding of City’s requirements, the suitability of your services and/or product(s) to meet City’s requirements, the strength of your work plan, previous experience, and current workload.

C. A detailed work plan to reflect the methods and procedures that the proposer intends to use to provide the required services. The scope of services outlined in this RFP is only provided as a guide and does not include all the tasks as required to complete the work.

D. A list of deliverables.

E. Procedures for perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) on the services to be provided.

F. Related experience including relevant experience date, name of agency, and Reference name/contact information.

G. A resource allocation matrix (exclude cost information).

4.3. Proposed Staff/Team
A. Information on key personnel who are expected to remain in service until completion of the contract.

B. Information on the back-up personnel in the event of the key personnel not available to provide the contracted services for certain period during the contract duration.

C. Provide resumes of proposed staff/team members.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
11 4.4. Required Statements
The Consultant’s Proposal shall include the following:

A. A statement that this RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of the Consultant's Proposal.

B. A statement that this RFP and the Consultant's Proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for this project when said Agreement is fully executed by the Consultant and the City of Moreno Valley.

C. A statement that the Consultant’s services to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City's RFP except as otherwise specified in the Consultant's Proposal under the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL." D. A single and separate section with the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" (if needed) containing a complete and detailed description of all of the exceptions to the provisions and conditions of this RFP upon which the Consultant’s Proposal is contingent and which shall take precedent over this RFP.

E. A statement of qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the Consultant’s staff to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact. If one or more of the Consultant’s staff should become unavailable, the Consultant may substitute other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City. The Consultant shall list the available staff for such substitution in the Proposal.

F. A resource allocation matrix must be submitted with the Proposal. The resource allocation matrix must list detailed tasks in rows and the appropriate individual (Job Title Only) as well as the number of hours that these individuals will be working on each task listed, will be included in adjacent columns. The resource allocation matrix and the project design schedule are required of both the primary consultant, as well as any sub-consultant. Failure to do so will result in the Consultant’s Proposal being deemed incomplete and it will not receive further consideration.

G. A statement of sub-consultant’s (include relief personnel) qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the sub-consultant’s staff to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact.

H. A statement that the Consultant acknowledges and understands that the Consultant will not be allowed to change any sub-consultants without written permission from the City.

I. A statement that all charges for Consultant services is a “Not-to-Exceed" Fee which must include conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made a part of said Consultant's Proposal.

J. A statement that the Consultant will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This may include preparation of office/field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement objectives.

K. A statement that the Consultant will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the construction work.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
12 L. A copy of the Consultant's hourly rate schedule and a statement that said hourly rate schedule is part of the Consultant's Proposal for use in invoicing for progress payments and for extra work (if prior approved) incurred that is not part of this RFP. An itemized cost breakdown for the work described herein must be submitted in a separate file, entitled "Cost Proposal", as part of the Consultant’s Proposal submittal. All extra work will require prior approval from the City.

M. A statement that the Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

N. A statement that all federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to notwithstanding any state or local laws and regulations. In a case of conflict between federal, state or local laws or regulations the strictest shall be adhered to.

O. A statement that the Consultant shall allow all authorized federal, state, county, and City officials access to place of work, books, documents, papers, fiscal, payroll, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this special project. All relevant records shall be retained for at least three (3) years.

P. A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC 276-a through a-7), and the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto (29 CFR Section 1, 5), any amendments thereof and the California Labor Code. Pursuant to the said regulations, entitled “Federal Labor Standards Provisions,” Federal Prevailing Wage Decision” and State of California prevailing wage rates, respectively.

Q. A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 USC 874) and the Implementation Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any amendments thereof.

R. A statement that the Consultant offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Consultant, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

4.5. Required Forms
A. Attachment G – Non-Collusion Declaration
B. Attachment H - Caltrans Exhibit 10-Q - Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

4.6. Cost Proposal
The proposer shall provide a separate file for technical proposal and a separate file for cost proposal.

A. Cost Proposal that includes all costs associated with the scope of services.

B. A rate schedule aligned with titles in the resource allocation matrix in Technical Proposal.

C. The general Scope of Services outlined herein is only provided as a guide in this Request for Proposal.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
13 D. Itemized tasks and corresponding costs must be identical to the detailed Scope of Services included as part of the Proposer’s Technical Proposal.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
14 5. PROSPECTIVE BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS

5.1. Prospective Bidder Qualifications
The intent of this RFP is to evaluate the proposals, determine the prospective bidder's that are in the competitive range, and select proposers that will provide the highest level of professional services for City.

5.2. Minimum Qualifications:

The proposed staff who will be providing Professional Consultant Services to complete Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design for the State Route 60 (SR-60) and Redlands Boulevard Interchange, as well as "optional services" to complete Plans, Specifications, Estimate (PSE) Phase and Right of Way Acquisition task, shall have the knowledge of:

A. Theories, principles and practices of civil engineering design and construction.

B. Principles and modern techniques and commonly used materials and equipment used in design, construction, and maintenance of various public works projects.

C. Federal, state and local laws, regulations, and court decisions applicable to public works projects.

D. Information technology and computer capabilities to perform daily engineering tasks.

E. Principles and practices of sound business communication, teamwork, and work ethics.

The proposed staff shall also possess the ability to:

A. Prepare, direct preparation of and review complex engineering designs, plans, specifications, and legal contracts.

B. Perform difficult technical research and analyze complex engineering and mathematical problems, evaluating alternatives and recommending or adopting effective courses of action.

C. Plan, organize, manage, and integrate engineering design and construction activities.

D. Design issues, analyze problems, evaluate alternatives, and develop sound and independent judgements and recommendations.

E. Understand, interpret, explain, and apply federal, state, and local policy, law, regulations, and court decisions applicable to public works project implementation.

F. Operate a personal computer using standard or customized software applications appropriate to assigned tasks.

G. Supervise and evaluate the work of professional consultants and construction contractors.

H. Prepare clear, concise, and comprehensive correspondence, reports, and other written materials.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
15 I. Organize, set priorities, and exercise sound independent judgement within areas of responsibility.

J. Exercise tact and diplomacy in dealing with sensitive and complex issues and situations.

K. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with City management, staff, contractors, consultants, representatives of other governmental and utility agencies, business and community groups, citizens, the public and others encountered in the course of work.

5.3. Education, Training and Licenses:

Registered Professional Civil Engineer License and other applicable professional licenses as required to complete the Work.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
16 6. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Written responses to the RFP must be prepared as specified in proposal content, as to form, content, and sequence. No changes to responses may be made after the submittal deadline.

The requested proposal shall be uploaded to OPENGOV on or before, but no later than the Date and Time as shown on Section 1.3 of this RFP. Any responses received after this time will not be considered by the City.

The response shall be signed by an officer, or officers, authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the respondent.

The City reserves the right to waive informalities in any proposal, to reject any or all proposals, to reject one part of a proposal and accept the other, except to the extent that proposals are qualified by specific limitations, and to make awards to the Consultants whose proposal is most beneficial to the needs of the City. Bidders are solely responsible for on time submission of their electronic bid. The City will only consider bids that have been transmitted successfully and have been issued an ebid confirmation number with a time stamp from the Bid Management System indicating that the bid was submitted successfully.

Transmission of bids by any other means will not be accepted. Bidders shall be solely responsible for informing themselves with respect to the proper utilization of the bid management system, for ensuring the capability of their computer system to upload the required documents, and for the stability of their internet service. Failure of the bidders to successfully submit electronic bids shall be at the bidders’ sole risk and no relief will be given for late and/or improperly submitted bids. Bidders experiencing any technical difficulties with the bid submission process may contact OpenGov at (650) 336-7167 or utilize the chat bubble in the system. Neither the City, nor OpenGov, makes any guarantee as to the timely availability of assistance, or assurance that any given problem will be resolved by the bid submission deadline.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
17 7. EVALUATION AND RANKING OF PROPOSALS
In accordance with the Chapter 3.12 PURCHASING City Municipal Code’s objective of selecting the most qualified consultant for providing the requested services, a Review Board which is composed of appropriate staff representatives and/or qualified outside representatives, will review the proposals received and select the most qualified firms.

The City reserves the right to conduct interviews during final selection if deemed necessary.

Review Board shall rank the prospective bidder's based upon the following criteria:

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Experience and Qualifications
Information about the company (and all subconsultants) including professional licenses held; ability to furnish required insurance and
meet stipulations of the City’s “boiler plate”
agreement; details about comparable projects
completed by the firm, as well as local
experience; and its ability to provide the
required services .

Points Based 20
(20% of Total)

2. Experience of Key Personnel
Background on key personnel (including all subconsultants) qualifications, abilities, familiarity with state and federal procedures, local
experience on comparable projects and length
of service with the firm, reference information
preferably with municipal agencies.

Points Based 40
(40% of Total)

3. Project Approach/Understanding
Discussion of major issues identified on the
project and how the consultant team plans to
address them; the management approach and
organization necessary to complete the specific
project; and outline quality control measures to
ensure delivery of a quality product on time and
within budget. Discussion of opportunities and
proposed plans to accelerate the work and
shorten delivery schedule.

Points Based 40
(40% of Total)
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
18 8. AWARD AND PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT
AWARD
A. After conclusion of the Evaluation and Ranking of Proposals processes, a Notification of Intent to Award may be sent to any prospective bidder's selected. City may make multiple awards.

B. Award is contingent upon the successful negotiation of final contract terms and the approval of City. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing prospective bidder's unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next best qualified prospective bidder's or withdraw the RFP. In the event City does not approve the recommendation to award, the RFP may be cancelled without any cost or obligation of City.

C. Prices are firm fixed prices during each contract period.

PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT
A. This work is to be performed for a “Not-to-Exceed" Fee amount as included in the Agreement.

B. The Consultant shall provide a “Project Fee Schedule” or Cost Proposal indicating the fees for individual tasks with a “Not-to-Exceed" Fee which shall be the sum of all tasks, and shall be submitted separately from the Technical proposal. The Cost Proposal must document the agreedupon progress payment and include the percent of work complete schedule.

C. Tasks shall include, but not be limited to, all professional consultant services necessary to complete the Work covered in this RFP.

D. Monthly progress payments may be submitted based on the percent of work complete for ongoing tasks as identified in the "Project Fee Schedule" or Cost Proposal. Invoices will specifically identify job titles, person-hours, and costs incurred by each task. Narratives shall be included with each progress payment summarizing and justifying the work and the percentage of work completed for each task for that month.

E. Reimbursement costs such as mileage, printing, telephone, photographs, postage and delivery, are to be included in the “Not-to-Exceed" Fee.

F. All tasks including labor and reimbursable costs such as mileage, printing, telephone, photographs, postage, and delivery shall be justified by supporting documentation presented at the time payment is requested.

G. Prior to performing work beyond the scope of service in this “Agreement for Professional Consultant Services,” the Consultant shall request for approval of such work from the City and shall not start without an approval. An “Amendment to the Agreement” will be executed between the City and Consultant.

H. The Consultant shall receive no compensation for any re-work necessary as result of the Consultant's errors or oversight.

I. The Consultant shall include a reasonable assumption for salary cost escalation beyond the current year.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
19 9. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

9.1. Termination
A. If, in the opinion of the City of Moreno Valley, the awarded consultant fails to perform or provide prompt, efficient service, the City must have the right to terminate or cancel the Agreement upon 5-day’s written notice and pay Provider for the value of the actual work satisfactorily performed to the date of termination.

B. The City of Moreno Valley must have the right to terminate or cancel the Agreement upon 30- day’s written notice without cause and pay Provider for the value of actual work satisfactorily performed to the date of termination.

C. These rights are in addition to any other rights that City may have available.

D. All finished or unfinished drawings, maps, documents, field notes and other materials produced and procured by the Consultant under the said aforementioned Agreement is, at the option of the City, City property and shall be delivered to the City by the Consultant within ten (10) working days from the date of such termination. The City will reimburse the Consultant for all acceptable work performed as set forth in the executed Agreement.

9.2. Public Employees Retirement Law (CalPERS)
A. CalPERS Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, in addition to obligations set forth in this section, in the event that any person providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of the City, to the fullest extent of the law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any costs and expenses incurred by City, including without limitation, payment that City is required as a result to make to CalPERS, whether in the form of employee and/or employer contributions, taxes, or any similar obligations, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest.

B. CalPERS Participation. As set forth in this Agreement and in the Request for Qualifications, City has an obligation to treat all persons working for or under the direction of CONSULTANT as an independent contractor of City and agents and employees of CONSULTANT, and not as agents or employees of City. CONSULTANT and City acknowledge and agree that City participates in a defined benefit plan (“CalPERS”), and that it is possible that CalPERS may find that persons providing services pursuant to this Agreement are employees of City and should be registered with the CalPERS as employees of City.

C. CalPERS Retiree Disclosure. CONSULTANT hereby expressly agrees to clearly and conspicuously disclose to City in writing any and all persons working for CONSULTANT who are retirees under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) whom receives a monthly CalPERS retirement allowance, and whom are, subject to City approval, assigned by CONSULTANT to provide services to City under the Agreement, prior to such person performing any services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted to limit a CalPERS retiree’s obligations under applicable law, rules or regulations.

D. Joint Cooperation. In the event that CalPERS initiates an inquiry that includes examination of whether individuals providing services under this Agreement to City are City’s employees, CONSULTANT shall within five days and share all communications and documents from CalPERS that it may legally share. In the event that either CONSULTANT or City files an appeal or court I.19.b
Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
20 challenge, CONSULTANT and City each agree to cooperate with each other in responding to the inquiry and any subsequent administrative appeal or court challenge of an adverse determination.

9.3. Managing Federal and State Funded Projects
No member of, or delegate to, the Congress of the United States, and no Resident Commissioner shall be admitted to any share or part of the Agreement to the said project or to any benefit to arise from the same.

As part of the Professional Consultant Services to complete Project Approval and Environmental Document (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design for the State Route 60 (SR-60) and Redlands Boulevard Interchange, as well as "optional services" to complete Plans, Specifications, Estimate (PSE) Phase and Right of Way Acquisition task,, the Consultant may be assigned to manage certain federal and state funded projects under FHWA, HUD, FEMA, and/or State Bills (SB). The work and/or services to be provided by the Consultant shall comply with all pertinent local, State, and Federal laws and regulations.

The Consultant, therefore, shall be legally able to perform services for Federal or State funded projects.

A contract DBE goal has not been established for the purpose of this RFP; however, DBE participation is encouraged. The Consultant may submit the Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment (Caltrans Exhibit 10- O1) as included in this RFP as Attachment F along with the proposal.

The Consultant shall also be required to submit the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Exhibit 10-Q) as included in this RFP along with the proposal.

9.4. Indemnification
For design professional services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 2782.8, in performing “design professional services” as defined in Section 2782.8, the Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant's employees, and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent, reckless, or willful misconduct in the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant under this RFP and/or related Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent, reckless or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.

For all non-design professional services, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant, or are caused or claim to be caused by the acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
21 9.5. Insurance
The Consultant shall have Insurance, Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance coverage for owned and non-owned automotive equipment, and Workers’ Compensation Insurance in the amounts as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California, per City Standard Agreement.

A Certificate of Insurance or an appropriate binder shall bear an endorsement containing the following provisions:
"Solely as respect to services done by or on behalf of the named insured for the City of Moreno Valley, it is agreed that the City of Moreno Valley, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), and the Moreno Valley Community Services District, its officers, employees and agents are included as additional insured under this general liability policy and the coverage(s) provided shall be primary insurance and not contributing with any other insurance available to the City of Moreno Valley, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), and the Moreno Valley Community Services District, its officers and employees and agents, under any third party liability policy."
Insurance companies providing insurance hereunder shall be rated (A minus: VII - Admitted) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide and shall be legally licensed and qualified to conduct insurance business in the State of California.

The terms of the insurance policy or policies issued to provide the above insurance coverage shall not be amended to reduce the above required insurance limits and coverage’s nor shall such policies be canceled by the carrier without thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail of amendment or cancellation to the Agency, except that cancellation for non-payment of premium shall require ten (10) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail. In the event the said insurance is canceled, the Consultant shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit to the City Clerk new evidence of insurance in the amount established.

9.6. Other Terms and Conditions
A. The Contract includes the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services, City's Request for Proposal, Consultant's Proposal, and Exhibits.

B. The Consultant's relationship to the City in the performance of the Consultant's services for this project is that of an independent Contractor. The personnel performing the said Services shall at all times be under the Consultant's exclusive direction and control and shall be employees of the Consultant and not employees of the City. The Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due his employees in connection with the performance of said work and shall be responsible for all employee reports and obligations, including but not necessarily restricted to, social security, income tax withholding, unemployment compensation, and Workers’ Compensation.

C. The Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code require that consultants be considered as potential filers of Statements of Economic Interest. Consultants, as defined by Section 18701, are required to file an Economic Interest Statement (Form 700) within 30 days of signing a Consultant Agreement with the City, on an annual basis thereafter if the contract is still in place, and within 30 days of completion of the contract.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
22 D. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by the Consultant in: (1) preparing the Proposal; (2) submitting the Proposal to the City; (3) presentation during selection interview; (4) negotiating with the City any matter related to this Proposal; (5) any other expenses incurred by the Consultant prior to an executed Agreement, are the Consultant's responsibility. The City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by the Consultant.

E. The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any Agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone reviewing the Proposal for its own convenience and to reject any and all Proposals responding to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s).

F. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals submitted. Any Contract awarded for these Consultant engagements will be made to the Consultant who, in the opinion of the City, is best qualified.

G. The Agreement is subject to pre-award audit by Caltrans, which is estimated to take a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days from the time Caltrans receives the pre-award audit submittal. After the pre-award audit recommendations are received, the Consultant's Proposal shall be adjusted by the Contract Manager to conform to the audit recommendations. The Consultant agrees that any audit recommendations regarding the contract amount, the Consultant's Proposal, or individual items of cost may be incorporated into the contract at the State's sole discretion. Refusal by the Consultant to incorporate the audit recommendations will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the contract or rejection for consideration of contract.

H. The Consultant shall provide its complete name and address, including whether the Consultant is an individual, a partnership, or a corporation. The Consultant shall list the location of the office where the Consultant's work will be available for inspection by local agency and State representatives.

I. The Consultant shall commence services upon written direction to proceed from the City. No charges are to be incurred prior to the Notice to Proceed.

J. For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500et seq., when applicable or other matters connected with the performance of the contract pursuant to Government Code 8546.7; the Consultant and subcontractors shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the contract. All parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract period and for three years from the date of final payment under the contract. The State, the State Auditor, City, Federal Highway Administration, or any duly authorized representative of the federal government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of the Consultant I.19.b
Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
23 that are pertinent to the contract for audit, examination, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. Subcontracts in excess of $25,000 shall contain provisions of this Agreement.

K. Cost Principles - Title 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Chapter 1, Part 31 and Uniform Administrative Requirements, Title 49 CFR, Part 18 are incorporated herein by reference. Any costs for which payment has been made to the Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31 et seq. or 49 CFR, Part 18, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments, are subject to repayment by the Consultant to the City.

L. The Consultant warrants that the Consultant has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this agreement, and that the Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or formation of this agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this agreement without liability, or at its discretion to deduct from the agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover, the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee.

M. Subcontractors, Assignment and Transfer - Consultant services are considered to be a personal relationship between the City and the Consultant; therefore, subcontracting, assignment, or transfer of any of the work except as otherwise provided for in the executed agreement is expressly prohibited. All subcontracts exceeding $25,000 in cost shall contain all required provisions of this Agreement.

N. The responsible Consultant shall sign all plans, specifications, estimates, and engineering data furnished by Consultant and where appropriate, indicate professional engineer registration number.

O. The Consultant shall disclose any financial, business, or other relationship with City that may have an impact upon the outcome of this contract. The Consultant shall also list current clients who may have financial interest in the outcome of this Agreement.

P. The Consultant hereby certifies that the Consultant does not now have and will not acquire any financial or business interest that would conflict with the performance of services under this Agreement.

Q. The Consultant hereby certifies that neither the Consultant, its employees, nor any firms affiliated with the Consultant providing services on this project, prepared the Plans, Specifications, and Estimates for any construction project included within this contract. An affiliated firm is one, which is subject to the control of the same persons through joint-ownership, or otherwise.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
24 10. LABOR LAWS, PREVAILING WAGE
All work or services performed within the State of California pursuant to this Agreement by Consultant, Consultant’s employees and independent consultants, or Consultant’s subconsultants and its subconsultants’ employees and independent consultants shall be performed by individuals lawfully permitted to perform such work or services in the State of California and/or the United States of America pursuant to all applicable State and/or Federal labor laws, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, any State or Federal law, rule or regulation prohibiting the employment of undocumented workers or any other person not lawfully permitted to perform said work or services in the State of California or the United States of America.

Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee, or applicant (“person”) for employment because of race, denial of family and medical care leave, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), color; national origin (including language use restrictions), ancestry, physical disability or mental disability (including HIV and Aids), medical condition (cancer and genetic characteristics), genetic information, military or veteran status, marital status, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breastfeeding), age or sexual orientation. Unless otherwise permitted under the law, Consultant shall not refuse to hire or employ any such person or refuse to select any such person for a training program leading to employment, or bar or discharge any such person from employment or from a training program leading to employment, or otherwise discriminate against any such person in compensation or in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.

This contract is subject to prevailing wage law, including but not limited to California Labor Code 1720 et seq. Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, Consultant and all of Consultant’s subconsultants, if any, shall pay each employee engaged in all applicable trades or occupation not less than the prevailing hourly wage rate for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 of the California Labor Code (“Labor Code”), the Director of Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rates of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, and subsistence pay as provided for in Labor Code Section 1773.8, apprenticeship or other training programs authorized by Labor Code Section 3093 and similar purposes applicable to the work to be done. Said wages are available through the California Department of Industrial Relations’ Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/PWD/index.htm and are on file at City Hall, as provided in Section 1773.2 of the Labor Code.

Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary, Consultant hereby acknowledges that all consultants and subconsultants must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“Department”) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 in order to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any public work contract, including this Agreement, that is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. The Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. In accordance with Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Consultant must secure payment of compensation to all I.19.b
Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
25 Consultant’s employees. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant is registered with the Department in the manner prescribed by the Department and has paid the requisite application fee, as required by Labor Code Section 1725.5. Moreover, prior to Consultant entering into any contracts with any subconsultant, Consultant shall obtain proof that all such subconsultants have also registered with the Department in accordance with Section 1725.5.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT Request For Proposal #2024-016
Title: PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES FOR STATE ROUTE 60/REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 801 0064
26 11. Vendor Questionnaire

11.1. Please download, complete and upload the attached required document.* Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. • Attachment_G_-_Non-Collusio...
*Response required

11.2. Please download, complete and upload the attached required document.* Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. • Attachment_H_-_Caltrans_Exh...
*Response required

11.3. Upload Project Proposal.*
*Response required

11.4. Upload Cost Proposal.*
*Response required
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT EXHIBIT “B”

CONSULTANT PROPOSAL
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SUBMITTED BY:

PROJECT NO. 801 0064 | MAY 9, 2024
PROPOSAL | 2024-016
SUBMITTED TO:

PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT DESIGN SERVICES
FOR STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD

INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
Exhibit "B"
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Michael Baker is dedicated to providing the City of
Moreno Valley with exceptional consulting services
on an accelerated schedule and within budget for the
SR-60 / Redlands Boulevard Interchange Project.

Our Team completed the PSR-PDS for the SR-60
Redlands Boulevard Interchange, completed
the PA/ED phase for the adjacent WLC Parkway
Interchange, and we are currently mid-way through the
PS&E phase of the WLC Parkway Interchange. For this
important project, we propose the same successful
team members that contributed to the PSR-PDS and
the WLC Parkway Interchange Project.
▬ Les Hopper, PE | Principal Project Manager
▬ Jerusalem Verano, PE | Deputy Project Manager
▬ Pooya Haddadi, PE | Structures Lead
We are also adding Hector Salcedo, PE as Engineering
Team Manager. Hector worked on the prior PSR-PDS and
brings that relevant experience to the team.

Our teaming partners were selected for their familiarity with the project. Fehr & Peers was on the Michael Baker Team for the PSR-PDS, and our exclusive geotechnical partner Leighton was a part of the Team that began the required studies. And although there is no current DBE requirement, we have added DBE firms Arellano Associates for
Outreach, and Monument Survey for Right-of -Way needs.

Firm Information
Legal Name
and Address:
(Office Avail. for
Inpection)
Michael Baker International, Inc.
5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite 260
Carlsbad, CA 92008
DIR: PW-LR-1000631983
Legal Form: Pennsylvania C Corporation
Authorized
Contact
Information
Les Hopper, PE | Principal Project Manager
5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite 260
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: 619-823-8490
Email: [email protected]
Year Founded: 1940
Length of
Relevant
Experience
84 Years
Current
Number of
Employees
National: 4,000+
Local: 165
Key Personnel: 9
Firm Background
Michael Baker is a full-service consulting firm providing planning, engineering, surveying, and related professional services for various agencies throughout California and the nation. We have been a pioneer and industry leader for over 80 years, with nearly 600 employees in 12 office locations throughout the state including Ontario, Temecula, and Palm Desert. Michael Baker has completed over 50 similar Project Development and PS&E projects within the D8 jurisdiction including interchange and corridor improvements.

The State-Route 60 (SR-60)/ Redlands Boulevard
interchange is a very important component of an
overall system improvement strategy that includes
the Moreno Beach Drive interchange to the west and
the World Logistics Center (WLC) Parkway interchange
directly to the east. All three interchange improvements are needed to accommodate rapid development both
north and south of SR-60. The adjacent interchanges are further through the development process and the City is looking to accelerate the environmental project approval and design processes for the Redlands interchange.

The success of this project will require a consultant team that is familiar with the City, understands the adjacent local developments, has a firm grasp of the local utility owners and their needs, and that has a strong working
relationship with the Caltrans District 8 (D8) staff and management.

The Michael Baker International, Inc. (Michael Baker)
Team meets all the project requirements. In this proposal, we will show exactly why this is the right team to
complete the SR-60/ Redlands Boulevard Interchange
Improvements Project.

The Right Team with Relevant Local Experience
Our talented team includes planners, engineers, GIS, and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) / National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental specialists.

Understanding of Local Issues and Approach for Success
The success of this project begins with our unique
understanding of the local issues as part of the larger system requirements. In this proposal we clearly demonstrate that we have the most experienced team with unparalleled technical and local knowledge. In addition, we have close working relationships with the stakeholders and decision makers, and our understanding of the project issues and association approach to those issues will accelerate the approval process for this interchange.

Familiarity with the City and Caltrans Procedures
Michael Baker’s Caltrans experience includes the preparation of over 75 Caltrans Design Reports (PSR, PR, and combined PSR/PRs), as well as final PS&E for over 150 projects totaling over $8 billion in improvements on state highways comprising over 15,000 plan sheets in accordance with Caltrans
standards. Michael Baker has unparalleled expertise with the Caltrans SER allowing for streamlined navigation of the Caltrans CEQA/NEPA review process, minimizing the duration and nature of Caltrans review cycles for technical studies and environmental documents, and expediting issuance of environmental approvals.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 2

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The Michael Baker Team’s understanding of the project area, project stakeholders, opportunities and challenges, and delivery process requirements is second to none. Throughout this section we will demonstrate our unparalleled understanding, followed by a discussion of our specific approach to project issues and delivery. We are always looking for ways to accelerate the project schedule. Below we have highlighted some of the factors that we view as keys to success. ▬ Project Initiation
▬ Traffic Forecasting and Analysis
▬ Value Engineering
▬ Public Outreach
▬ Coordination with Resource Agencies
▬ Riverside County Flood Control District
▬ WLC Parkway/SR-60 Interchange PS&E & Corridor
▬ Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)

KEY SUCCESS FACTORS
The Michael Baker Team recognizes the importance of completing the PA/ ED, PS&E, and construction of the SR-60/ Redlands Boulevard interchange as part of an overall system improvement strategy that includes the Moreno Beach Drive interchange to the west and the World Logistics Center (WLC) Parkway interchange directly to the east. The current PA/ED phase was initiated in January 2022 and needs to be accelerated to catch up with the adjacent projects, both of which are further along in the project development process. All three interchange improvements are needed to accommodate rapid development both north and south of SR-60.

In addition to the new 15,000 unit development planned to the southwest of this interchange, the City is also the home of the recently entitled World Logistics Center just to the southeast. The World Logistics Center features over 100 million square feet of land that will host the largest logistics distribution area in the United States. Access will be via SR-60 and the development will host goods movement traffic from the California ports to the west and all states to the east. Also, planned build out of the area will generate substantial traffic growth on SR-60. As such, these proposed interchange improvements at all three local access points are paramount to the success of the City and regions growth. Specifically, the SR-60/ Redlands Boulevard Interchange improvements are needed to alleviate future congestion, enhance freeway access and regional goods movement (considering the World Logistics Center), improve traffic operations to support the forecast travel demand for the 2050 design year; and update the bridge clearance over SR-60 to current state standards. The existing Redlands Boulevard overcrossing (PM 20.37, Bridge Number 56-0487) has four spans and is approximately 236 feet long and 34 feet wide. The improved interchange will also include multimodal facilities consistent with the City General Plan, the Circulation Plan, and Bike and Trail Master Plans, which will help to offset the new Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) guidelines since capacity increasing projects are no longer permitted per SB 743 SR-60 is functionally classified as Principal Arterial according to the Transportation Concept Report (TCR), dated September 2012.

It is a Surface Transportation Assistance Act (STAA) Route for use by oversized trucks and included in the State Highway System (SHS). It is a six-lane facility to the west, consisting of two mixed flow lanes and an auxiliary lane in the eastbound direction and two mixed flow lanes and a managed lane in the westbound direction. The eastbound auxiliary lane is dropped at the entrance to existing eastbound Redlands Boulevard off-ramp. The westbound managed lane is added at the end of the existing westbound Redlands Boulevard on-ramp. To the east, SR-60 is a four-lane facility, with two mixed flow lanes in each direction. Ultimately the state plans to add two additional lanes on the inside which will connect to the recently completed truck climbing lanes project entering the “badlands” to the east.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 3

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
N
# CHALLENGE CONSIDERATIONS
1 Non-Standard
Vertical Profile
Identify bridge type options such as precast or castin-place concrete to correct the bridge profile while minimizing impact on grading and adjacent parcels.
2 Keep Traffic
Open During
Construction
Implement staged-construction in design of the bridge
to keep the existing bridge open to traffic during the
construction.
3 Tie-In to
existing
roundabout
Leverage our roundabout experience gained from the
SR-60/WLC Project and tie into the existing roundabout
approach or slightly modify the approach if needed.
4 Existing
Property Owner
Impacts
Limit impacts to the existing residents within public right of way. Maintain an access road to the Horse Ranch
Supply parcel.
5 Environmental
Considerations
- Biology,
Jurisdictional
Waters, and
Noise
Early submittal of the existing Noise model will maintain the project on schedule. Early coordination and
identification of jurisdictional waters and contact with RCA will be key on the project.
6 Induced VMT Identify potential VMT impacts and need for mitigation. 7 Utilities
SCE pole relocation will be needed. Early coordination
with SCE will be established in PA/ED and carried into
PS&E.
1 EXISTING SR-60/REDLANDS

BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE
2 3
4 LEVERAGING OUR PROJECT EXPERIENCE TO JUMPSTART PA/ED
The City can be assured of prompt and efficient progress through our Team's readiness in streamlined schedule to hit project milestones. The following table demonstrates our understanding of project challenges and our experience informing our approach to delivering a high quality design.

Figure 1 below illustrates the existing conditions at the SR-60/ Redlands Interchange area. It includes a brief list of associated project issues and considerations that need to be addressed in the PA/ED phase. Our approach to these issues and others is discussed in greater detail in the Project Approach section on the following pages. 5 6 7
Figure 1 – Existing Conditions
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 4

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
Project History - PSR/PDS
The City (working with Michael Baker) completed a Project Study Report - Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) in June of 2016 which was approved by Caltrans. In addition to the four alternatives, various common improvements to the interchange were proposed which include, but are not limited to: 1) reconstruction and realignment of SR 60/Redlands Blvd. ramps, 2) widening of Redlands Blvd. and replacement of the overcrossing structure, 3) realignment of Spruce Street on the north side of SR-60 near Redlands Boulevard, 4) provision for California Highway Patrol (CHP) enforcement areas as required, 5) addition of ramp metering, 6) coordination of new and relocated utilities, and 7) provision for landscaping and irrigation, and 8) related local street and mainline improvements as required by the City and Caltrans.

The PSR-PDS included four alternatives: one no-build alternative and three build alternatives. The build alternatives featured various partial cloverleaf configurations to a spread diamond. Caltrans is the lead for both CEQA and NEPA, and there was an initial determination of a CEQA Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and a NEPA Environmental Assessment with Finding of No Significant Impact (EA/FONSI). Recent VMT analysis policies will require that the team look closely at updated traffic volumes and associated potential impacts (See Approach Section).

The project will receive funding from the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) for the Project Authorization and Environmental Documentation (PA&ED) Phase and Preliminary Engineering Design. We understand that additional TUMF funding may become available for implementing the PS&E Phase and Right of Way Acquisition in the coming fiscal years which could allow the project to move forward. Michael Baker is currently assisting Highland Fairview with a grant funding playbook and the application process for both the WLC and Redlands interchanges. Those initial planning efforts now move into the more challenging and critical phase of project approval through a Project Report (Approval) and Environmental Document (PA/ED) for the SR-60/Redlands Boulevard Project.

Other Studies and Efforts in the Area
While the SR-60/ Redlands Boulevard PSR-PDS completed by Michael Baker has been instrumental in establishing a foundation for continued project development, it is important to fully consider any other complementary transportation planning or design efforts that will contribute to the success of this project. Most relevant are the consideration of any updated studies (such as Traffic or Geotechnical for example) done for this project since 2022 that can be utilized to accelerate the schedule. We will also utilize adjacent approval documents such as the SR-60/ WLC Pkwy interchange PA/ED for similar features and continuity.

Signed PSR-PDS
SR-60 / Redlands Boulevard Interchange
Signed Project Approval Document
SR-60/World Logistics Center Parkway Interchange
Environmental Impact Report
SR-60/World Logistics Center Parkway Interchange
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 5

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING

PROJECT APPROACH
Success on the SR-60/Redlands Boulevard Interchange Project can be measured in several ways. The City, Caltrans District 8, and local stakeholders will likely measure success on how well project issues, and other factors that can take a project off track, are anticipated and resolved in a timely manner-especially on a project that has already been stalled. Our overarching goal will be to accelerate the project and make up time. This will occur through quick approval of the traffic volume(s) analysis and the subsequent screening of alternatives updates.

The measure of success for the Michael Baker Team will be how well our Team provides flexibility within the typical evolving process of the planning phase of a project, and in providing the foresight, guidance and information needed by all of the approving agencies in making sustainable decisions to advance this project forward expeditiously. The informed decisions – at both a policy and technical level – set the foundation and also serve as the “building blocks” for a successful project.

Our very experienced Team addresses these project success measures in two primary ways – through “key policy/ procedural matters” and “critical technical issues.”
A) Key Policy and Procedural Matters and Approach Strategy The Michael Baker Team has identified the following key policy/procedure matters and our approach strategy for:

1. Traffic Modeling & Analysis

2. Approach to New and/or Relevant Legislation

3. Approach to Accelerating the Delivery of PA/ED and PS&E

1. Traffic Modeling & Analysis
A Traffic Engineering Performance Assessment (TEPA), dated February 2016, was prepared by Michael Baker Team member Fehr & Peers for the original PSRPDS to provide a macro-level assessment of readily available traffic information at that time. The traffic analysis model at that time used Level of Service (LOS) as the measure of acceptable traffic flow patterns. The TEPA showed that without improvements, the then horizon year 2045 volumes for the eastbound and westbound on-and off-ramps are anticipated to operate at unacceptable LOS.

Similarly, the ramp intersections are anticipated to operate at unacceptable LOS, and the mainline segments on SR-60 between Moreno Beach Drive and Theodore Street are anticipated to operate at unacceptable LOS.

Recent discussions with Caltrans have confirmed that updated traffic volumes have been approved. However, it seems that the counts used in the volumes report were collected when one of the study interchange ramps was closed. As such an updated volumes report would be beneficial using new traffic counts. Caltrans staff indicated that the previous effort used Synchro and HCS assessment software, but that approach limits the ability to do multi-time-period assessment consistent with Caltrans’ expectations.

Given that understanding our Team has outlined the following approach that has been highly successful on our other Caltrans’ PA&ED efforts:
▬ Update the Volumes Report –Team member Fehr & Peers will review the previous volumes report submitted for the project and supplement with fall 2023 traffic counts at the Redlands ramp terminal intersections and adjacent intersections that reflect conditions with the ramps open and in operation. They will also complete updated travel demand model runs to finalize the growth assumptions in the volume report and will compare that back to recent studies they have completed in the City (like other development projects south of SR-60 in the City). ▬ Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) – ICE is one of the items that stalled in the prior effort. Both Michael Baker and Fehr & Peers staff have relevant recent experience in the preparation of a Caltrans ICE document. We understand that an early ICE assessment for the proposed interchange designs informs the project team on relevant aspects of the design alternatives and environmental footprint, which is a critical early step. See Item B, on Figure 3 – Alternatives Considerations Exhibit. ▬ Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR) – Fehr & Peers will complete the TOAR for the project, documenting the results of the operations assessment and assisting with ensuring the project meets the purpose and need. Please note that the team will ultimately receive a “finding of no further comments” on the TOAR which is needed to get into GAD development, but Caltrans will not finalize the TOAR until the HSM assessment is complete. The TOAR will ultimately be resubmitted to be approved after our Team has completed the HSM assessment.

Time Saving
Approach:

Our Team would like to use more
recent counts taken in late 2023
with the ramp open, and thus move
forward immediately rather than
waiting for the fall season to do
re-counts.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 6

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING

2. Approach to New/Relevant Legislation
California Senate Bill 743 | SB 743 has changed the way environmental studies will be conducted, with respect to traffic impacts in the State. Originally intended primarily for development projects, this legislation now affects capital improvements such as the SR-60/ Redlands Boulevard Interchange Project. Changes eliminated the use of LOS to determine CEQA traffic impacts for projects within transit priority areas. Project analysis is now required to use an alternative method of evaluating traffic: Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Michael Baker Team Member Fehr & Peers has identified a five-step process for VMT Documentation –assuming through lanes are added to the interchange or if auxiliary lanes greater than one mile are needed for the project. These deliverables include:
▬ Induced Travel Study Methodology Memorandum. This will document and describe how the VMT assessment will be completed including the methodology employed for the effort. ▬ VMT Study, Draft. The draft quantitative VMT analysis results will be documented in a report. Any significant VMT impacts will be identified.
▬ VMT Study, Final. Our Team will respond to Caltrans comments on the draft submittal as final. This document will be shared with Caltrans Headquarters for concurrence.
▬ Mitigation Scoping Plan. This step is only required if the project is determined to lead to a measurable and substantial increase in vehicle travel. If so, we will work with the City to summarize any proposed mitigation associated with the project to off-set the induced travel impacts of the project.
▬ Induced Travel Risk Assessment. This step is only required if the project is determined to lead to a measurable and substantial increase in vehicle travel and the induced VMT is not fully mitigated. A subsequent memorandum summarizing the findings will be submitted to Caltrans Headquarters for review and concurrence documenting why VMT mitigation is not feasible with the project.

Regarding the potential VMT mitigation, our Team will work closely with the City on potential bike path and multi-use trail extensions in the region. Ironically the cable stayed pedestrian bridge as part of the WLC project would likely more than offset any VMT increases. See Item J, on Figure 3 – Alternatives Considerations Exhibit.

3. Approach to Accelerating the Delivery of PA/ED and PS&E Michael Baker is uniquely positioned to deliver this PA/ED phase and optionally a future PS&E phase .Due to our ongoing work on SR-60 and WLC Development Michael Baker can help expedite this project for the City through several ways as listed below:
▬ Stakeholder and Agency Relationships. Our Team has been working closely and has good relations with City, Highland Fairview (developer), and Caltrans staff that will be part of this interchange team. Our entire team leadership has either worked on the SR-60/ WLC project, or on the prior phase of this project. These relationships will allow for trusted lines of communication, which will in turn result in faster deliverables preparation and agency reviews. There is no learning curve! ▬ Project CAD Files. No other Team will be as ready as Michael Baker to begin this work. Our Team has extensive knowledge of the area and has CAD files already configured for this corridor. Our Team is prepared, and there is no time needed to ramp up!
▬ Survey and Topographic Mapping. We understand the City has performed some survey and topographic mapping for the interchange project. Michael Baker has final design level LIDAR and Aerial Topographic Mapping that can be utilized for the SR-60 / Redlands interchange project. This will allow our Team to assess and screen geometric alternatives as soon as we have updated traffic (see above discussion).
▬ Alternatives Screening/ Confirm Purpose and Need. In order to save valuable time in the PA/ED initiation process, it will be imperative to obtain updated traffic volumes, topography, and screen project alternatives. Our Team has an accelerated process for all three described in this approach. These items will also allow us to confirm or update the project Purpose and Need- which is the driver to begin PA/ED.
▬ Right of Way Mapping & Monumentation: The Michael Baker team recently completed updates to the existing right of way base mapping for the SR-60 and WLC Pkwy corridor PS&E. This work included boundaries around the SR-60 / Redlands Blvd. interchange which can be utilized during the PA/ED phase to develop more accurate right of way cost impacts. This will result in a more complete PA/ED design and will again save time during the PS&E phase.

Value Added
The Michael Baker Team is currently working to
deliver the SR-60 WLC Parkway Interchange
PS&E Improvement Plans and the Ultimate/Interim
WLC Parkway Corridor Plans.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 7

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
▬ Project Overlap. The SR-60/WLC Parkway Auxiliary lane improvements overlap with the Redlands Blvd. ramp improvements.

Close coordination between the projects will allow for more accurate and consistent designs and timely approvals. Having the same team ensures this time-saving coordination!
▬ Stage Construction. The timing of the construction efforts for the Redlands Blvd. Interchange and the WLC interchange will need to be closely coordinated. Stage construction and traffic routing will be considered as a system Redlands catches up to WLC. Our Team is best suited for this coordinated effort! ▬ PA/ED to PS&E Design Transition Schedule Savings. A major schedule saver will come from the PA/ED to PS&E design transition. Michael Baker proposes to prepare a 30% design level PS&E GAD for the preferred project alternative in PA/ED that is fully developed to a PS&E standard. We will work with Caltrans management to confirm this process. Overlapping the PA/ED and PS&E phases in this manner will reduce the project schedule by months and allow for faster approval of nonstandard features and the start of the 65% PS&E submittal package. ▬ Exclusive Geotechnical Engineering Subconsultant Partner. Our exclusive geotechnical partner, Leighton, has already completed the Draft PGDR and Draft SPGR.

B) Critical Project Technical Issues & Approach Strategy The Michael Baker Team has identified a number of critical project technical issues that we feel are critical to successful project delivery. Those issues are identified on Figure 3 – Alternatives Considerations Exhibit on the following page. For ease of discussion, we have overlain PSR-PDS Alternative 4 on the graphic. Issues along with our approach have been identified with letter designations and are discussed in more detail throughout this approach.

Early Alternative Screening
Three (3) build alternatives were proposed in the PSR-PDS: Alternative 2 - Modified Spread Diamond, Alternative 3 – Spread Diamond, and Alternative 4 – Modified Partial Cloverleaf. The TEPA assessed these interchange configurations during the previous phase, and all alternatives performed well and with LOS C or better. Alternative 4 had the most impact with Alternative 2 having the least by eliminating a direct Westbound on-ramp from Redlands Blvd. Our Team understands that an early alternatives screening with stakeholder approval will be key to reducing the project schedule and will result in cost savings.

As noted above, an updated and approved Project Purpose and Need (P&N) statement will be required to fully develop the PA/ ED alternatives. The alternative screening will be developed in close conjunction with the City and other stakeholders to study alternatives that meet the desired aesthetic, safety, and future development plans in the area. This will be a task that is performed simultaneously with the preparation of an updated Traffic Analysis / Volumes Study Report, Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) report, Geometric Approval Drawing (GAD), and will ultimately be finalized through a Value Analysis Study. Once these reports are completed, we will work with the City to develop a comprehensive alternative screening matrix that is acceptable to the project stakeholders. Alternatives are screened based on agreed upon factors such as right of way impacts, environmental, traffic, safety, constructability, utility, long term maintenance, and other metrics. This matrix will be used to refine the number of build alternatives studied during PA/ED to two. This process will save months off the project schedule.

Figure 2 – Example Alternatives Screening Matrix
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 8

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERATIONS EXHIBIT
Water Line
Multi-Use Trail
Sidewalk
Proposed Caltrans R/W
Existing Caltrans R/W
Proposed City R/W
Existing City R/W, Existing Parcel
SCE OH Lines
Gas Utility
New Signal
Retaining Walls
EMWD Water Line
C
C
D
D
D
D
A
B
B
B
E G
H
I
J
60” RCP
1 2
3 3
Route 60
Redlands Blvd
Eucalyptus Ave
Aldi Industrial
Warehouse
Protect
Booster
Station
Coordinate with Riverside
County Flood Control
District Basin Project
Join Exist Redlands
Prop Retaining Wall
Potential Retaining Wall/
Sound Wall
Potential Retaining Wall/
Sound Wall
Relocate SCE
OH Lines
Gas Line
Join Existing
Redlands Roundabout
Protect Existing
Frontage
Opportunity to Close
Multi-Use Trail Gap
On Eucalyptus Ave
Existing Multi-Use Trail

RV / BOAT
Spruce Ave
Highland
Fairview
Sketchers
Hemlock Ave (Future)
F
F
F

CONSIDERATIONS RECCOMENDATIONS
A Hemlock Ave
Improvements
Michael Baker will coordinate with the City on proposed Hemlock Improvements and local access to account for
R/W, utilities, and RCFCD access needs.

B Intersection Control
Evaluation (ICE)
Reporting
The Michael Baker International team has extensive
experience preparing ICE reports and will work with the City and Caltrans to complete this item.

C Minimize Right-ofWay Impacts
• Study alternative options to eliminate WB direct onramp in the NW quadrant • Consider options to not impact NE quadrant homes
D Potential Cost
Savings
• Reduce median width through interchange
• Eliminate retaining walls
• Redlands Profile & Bridge Type / Construction
Method
E Structure
Considerations
• Consider alternatives that reduce bridge width and
costs
• Design with stage construction in mind
• Address non-standard vertical clearance with
alternative bridge construction methods and type
F Utility &
External Agency
Considerations
• Existing utilities in the area include SGC GAS, water (EMWD), and SCE electric, MVU, and communication
lines
• It is our understanding EMWD wishes to extend new
sewer and water lines through the interchange
• Existing non-transmission SCE OH lines will need to
be relocated or under-grounded
G Consider Future
SR-60 Widening
• Assume SR-60 to be widened in the future per RTIP
• Set ramp geometry to avoid costly reconsturction
H Adjacent Projects
Coordination
Coordinate Auxillary lane improvements with adjacent
projects.

I Evaluate Design
Exceptions
• Nonstandard weaving length ramp to ramp
• Ramp metering (clear recovery)
• 2: 1 embankment slopes
J Pedestrian / MultiUse Facilities
• Extend multi-use trail and sidewalk facilities through the interchange
• Opportunity to extend trail and close gap on
Eucalyptus Ave
1 Environmental
Considerations
• Noise Study - Evaluate need for sound walls
• Biological - Seasonally dependent and regulatory
requirements (schedule impacts)
• Jurisdictional waters - existing open channels
2 VMT Impact • VMT increases are considered a “significant impact” • An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is scoped for
this impact for the most realistic schedule and cost
• VMT mitigation options: Multi-use trail, re-zoning /
land use considerations, optional City road diets
3 Riverside
County Flood
Control District
Coordination
RCFCD intends to construct a basin in the NE quadrant
of the interchange and may require access from
Hemlock Ave. Determine Existing Channel & 60” RCP
impacts. Coordinate improvements early to set project
footprint.

Existing Multi-Use Trail
Figure 3 – Alternative Considerations Exhibit
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 9

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
PA/ED Phase Geometric Refinements & Design Options
In addition to right sizing the interchange for the future design year traffic conditions on both Redlands Blvd. and SR-60 within the project improvement area, other geometric refinements will include the development of Hemlock Avenue and the redesign of Spruce Avenue (See Item A on Figure 2 - Alternatives Considerations Exhibit.) All build alternatives are anticipated to join the existing Redlands Blvd. / Eucalyptus Avenue roundabout to the south, which was recently completed by the City. Final refinements will be illustrated for each build alternative on a Geometric Approval Drawing (GAD) in a strip map format for Caltrans review and approval. Design refinements include many considerations such as safety, multi-modal access, drainage, utility relocations and protections, structures, cross-section, stage construction methods, right of way impacts, coordination with adjacent projects, environmental footprint, and latest design standards to name a few.

With these elements in consideration, and using lessons learned from the WLC project, the project team has identified several critical design items to be considered in the PA/ED phase:
▬ Vertical Profile & Bridge Considerations. The existing Redlands Blvd. bridge overcrossing has a non-standard vertical clearance of 15 feet 6 inches. (i could add a photo here) The project will raise the Redlands OC bridge and standardize it to the latest Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) vertical clearance requirement of 16 feet 6-inches. Michael Baker had to develop a very similar vertical profile realignment for the SR-60 / WLC Pkwy interchange and was successful in gaining Caltrans approval on an alignment that minimized grading and right of way impacts to the south.

Our Team will employ a similar strategy for the Redlands interchange profile by considering alternative bridge construction methods and types. These will include a cast-in-place concrete bridge type combined with special design shallow-depth falsework, or a cast-in-place high and then lower construction method. Another alternative could be to utilize precast girders, which would eliminate the need for falsework during construction. As seen in Figure 4 below, when compared to conventual design and construction methods, these alternatives will minimize profile and grading limits impacts both north and south of SR-60 on Redlands Boulevard. This will be an essential design element to joining the existing Redlands Blvd. / Eucalyptus Avenue interchange and minimizing right of way impacts.

Figure 4 – Redlands Boulevard Profile Options
▬ Geometric Cost Savings. Our Team will work with the City to develop accurate cost estimates for the build alternatives for the purposes of cost planning and funding grants. Through the geometric refinement process, Michael Baker will look for cost saving opportunities: Some of which can be 1) the reduction of the Redlands Blvd. median width which will also narrow the bridge width; 2) the elimination of retaining walls in the northwest and southwest quadrants based upon grading and noise studies; 3) depending on traffic performance, there may be an opportunity to eliminate the westbound direct on-ramp which would save the project in both cost and schedule; and 4) coordination of adjacent project auxiliary lane improvements with the overlapping Redlands Blvd. on- and off-ramps in the east and westbound directions. ▬ Future Planning. The long-term regional planning documents, RTIP, identifies the need for an additional general-purpose lane in each direction of SR-60 from Redlands Blvd. to Gilman Springs Rd. This project is not anticipated to environmentally clear or construct these mainline lanes and it is understood that this will be part of a future project. However, the Redlands Interchange work will consider the future lane widening and set the on- and off-ramps accordingly to avoid costly reconstructions and traffic impacts in the future.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 10

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
▬ Pedestrian and Bike Facilities (See Item J, on Figure 3 – Alternatives Considerations Exhibit). The City master planning documents identify a multi-use trail and Class II bike facilities through Redlands Blvd. from Eucalyptus Avenue north to Ironwood Avenue. The project will seek to implement this multi-use trail on the westside of Redlands Blvd. to avoid impacts to the existing Highland Fairview property on the east side. Additionally, there is an opportunity to close the multi-use trail gap on Eucalyptus Avenue between Aldi and Redlands Blvd. by constructing a short segment between the roundabout and Aldi Road.

This would expand the project area and may require additional right of way. Class II bikeways can be accommodated within the road section north and south. Sidewalks can be designed on both sides of Redlands Blvd. or just one depending on the City’s preferences. These pedestrian, bike, and multi-use facilities will improve safety and connectivity, help with future grant funding, and serve as potential VMT mitigation measures. See Figure 5 below for one build alternative typical section. ▬ Hemlock Avenue Considerations. Michael Baker will work with the City to develop an appropriate Hemlock Avenue Road cross-section and intersection build-out at Redlands Blvd. that minimizes right of way impacts. It is our understanding that the RCFCD has plans for a future basin in the northeast quadrant and may require site access from a future Hemlock Avenue Road. This design element will be coordinated during the PA/ED phase to identify cost sharing, schedule and other overlapping design considerations.

Figure 5 – Potential Typical Section Along Redlands Boulevard Bridge ▬ Right of Way Impacts Considerations. Existing residential and commercial areas in the northwest quadrant of the interchange are impacted by two out of three build alternatives. Early in the project development phase, our Team will work closely with the City and Fehr & Peers to understand the need for a direct westbound on-ramp that currently cuts through these parcels. If this on-ramp can be eliminated, it would significantly reduce the amount of right of way and community impacts for at least one build alternative. (See Item C, on Figure 3 – Alternatives Considerations Exhibit). ▬ Drainage Considerations. The project site receives some offsite flow from the mountainous areas to the north.

Approximately 200 cfs was estimated to be tributary to the interchange in the 2016 PSR-PDS study conducted by Michael Baker. During PA/ED, this flow will be verified and used to evaluate the performance of the existing cross culverts that lie along the east and west sides of Redlands Boulevard, under Route 60. The location of these culverts will be evaluated to determine if the proposed bridge construction will impact the culverts. A site visit will be performed to assess the culvert condition in addition to review of the Caltrans Culvert Inspection data. On-site storm drains will be designed to convey the runoff to water quality BMPs and ultimately to the cross culverts. This area is identified as a Significant Trash Generating Area in the Caltrans Statewide Trash Implementation Plan and Trash BMPs will be included in the PA/ED design and cost estimates. ▬ Utilities & External Agency Coordination (See Item F, on Figure 3 – Alternatives Considerations Exhibit). During the PA/ED phase utilities will be studied and mapped for determining impacts and costs associated with any relocations. It would be our approach to minimize utility relocations as much as possible through geometric alignment and by performing extensive utility research and coordination early in the PA/ED phase with agencies with utilities in the area.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 11

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
EMWD. It is our understanding that EMWD has the intention of developing new water and sewer lines through a future Redland Blvd. Interchange. The project team would solicit feedback from EMWD early to properly locate and identify these utility betterments, their costs, and project geometric impacts. The existing EMWD booster station identified in the PSR-PDS has now been constructed and will be protected
in place during PA/ED. This will ensure a more developed PA/ED design and smoother process during PS&E for utility betterments and relocations.

SoCal Gas. Based on our current knowledge of the area, SCG has an existing utility crossing beneath SR-60. Our Team will coordinate with SCG to develop and layout the existing utility line and potential betterments through the interchange.

Southern California Edison (SCE) & Moreno Valley
Electric Utility (MVU). It is our understanding the existing SCE overhead distribution lines will need to be relocated due to the widening of the interchange. The existing OH lines are located just west of Redlands Blvd. The existing wiring is nontransmission which will allow for easier relocation, likely west of the new bridge structure. The project team will coordinate with MVU to reserve utility spacing within the bridge structure. The Michael Baker team is coordinating with both agencies on the WLC Pkwy / SR-60 project.

Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD). It is our understanding the RCFCD is proposing to develop a flood control basin in the northeast quadrant of the Redlands Blvd. interchange. The agency also has an existing concrete lined channel west of Redlands Blvd. that is impacted by the project alternatives. This channel flows into a 60” line that runs through SR-60 and south toward Redlands Blvd. Early RCFCD coordination will be a key factor in determining the layout of the project alternatives and minimizing costly redesigns.

Utility Coordination is Essential
Michael Baker has a strong position given its current
utility base map work for the WLC Pkwy /SR-6 0
interchange. This work and ongoing coordination /
relationships can be further utilized on the
Redlands Boulevard PA/ED.

The Existing Redlands / Hemlock EMWD Booster Station.

Protect in Place and Coordinate New Utility Lines.

Existing SCE OH Lines & RCFCD Concrete Channel.
▬ Bridge Structure Approach & Interchange Aesthetics (See Item E, on Figure 3 – Alternatives Considerations Exhibit).

Our primary goal is to replace the existing Redlands Boulevard OC with a new bridge that adheres to current design code standards, accommodates the current and future traffic demands, and aligns with the Complete Streets and Context-Sensitive Solutions as outlined in the City of Moreno Valley General Plan. This replacement will also align with the build alternatives described in the approved Project Study Report (PSR). During the Preliminary Alternatives Evaluation and Development (PAED) phase, we will conduct an in-depth study to address key issues that impact cost, project schedule, and constructability through the preparation of an Advance Planning Study for the build alternatives. * Meet Vertical Clearance Standards
* Design for ultimate SR-60 Lane Configuration
* Accommodate Existing and Proposed Utilities Through the Structure * Keep the Bridge Open for Traffic During Construction (See Staged Construction).

Existing Bridge
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 12

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
▬ Staged Bridge Construction. Our goal is to assist the city in keeping the existing bridge open during construction. This approach minimizes the impact on traffic circulation in the vicinity of the bridge, allowing travelers to continue using it during the construction period. As part of the Advance Planning Study preparation during the PAED phase, Michael Baker will evaluate the staged construction approach for the bridge construction. This technique involves constructing part of the new bridge alongside the existing bridge while traffic continues to use the existing structure. Once the partial construction of the new bridge is complete, traffic will be shifted from the existing bridge to the new bridge. The existing bridge will then be demolished, and construction of the remaining new bridge will commence. Finally, the new bridge segments will be connected using a deck closure pour, resulting in a full-width bridge that’s in compliance with the required traveled way. This is exactly what this team is doing to minimize traffic impacts at the WLC interchange to the east.

Our approach involves configuring the bridge geometry to align with the ultimate freeway width at SR-60. We will evaluate options such as minimizing the number of spans in the bridge by eliminating redundant columns and utilizing a 2-span design instead of the current 4-span configuration for the existing bridge. By doing so, we aim to reduce traffic impact to road facilities adjacent to the interchange and minimize ground impact resulting from the foundation work. Notably, this concept situates columns and their foundations within the median of SR-60, allowing for future widening of SR-60 without impacting the bridge. ▬ Bridge Aesthetics. Our goal is to assist the city in keeping the existing bridge open during construction. This approach minimizes the impact on traffic circulation in the vicinity of the bridge, allowing travelers to continue using it during the coThe SR-60 Corridor Master Plan for Aesthetics and Landscaping (2010) within the Moreno Valley City limits designates the Redlands Blvd. Interchange as a non-gateway interchange. It is our understanding that the City wishes to follow the aesthetic guidelines developed within the master plan and prioritize the project delivery schedule. Our Team has worked closely with the City and local stakeholders to implement the desired aesthetic vision for the WLC Pkwy / SR-60 bridge and will do the same for the Redlands Blvd. Interchange on a reduced scale. Our Team will work to ensure all desired aesthetic features and monuments are cleared in the PA/ED phase for design and construction in PS&E to save on costly environmental re-validation technical studies.

Figure 6 – SR-60 Corridor Master Plan Bridge Elevation
▬ Environmental Considerations. Michael Baker’s in-house Environmental Sciences Team will leverage its extensive experience with Caltrans District 8 facilities to expedite successful delivery of the project. Michael Baker has a wellestablished track record of streamlining environmental approvals for State Highway system projects, working in close consultation with local agency and Caltrans staff. Michael Baker has an extensive resume and strong relationships with Caltrans District 8 Environmental Planning staff and unparalleled expertise with the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference (SER). This experience allows for streamlined navigation of the Caltrans CEQA/NEPA review process, minimizing the duration and nature of Caltrans review cycles for technical studies and environmental documents, and expediting issuance of environmental approvals.

Through careful review of the proposed improvements, existing environmental setting, and the Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (PEAR) prepared for the project, we have identified the following key environmental constraints, along with our proposed methodology to successfully streamline environmental approvals:
* Initiation of Technical Studies. Michael Baker’s environmental specialists will work side-by-side with our design team to advance preparation of technical studies early during the PA/ED phase. Key to this effort will be setting conservative maximum limits of disturbance to allow for field work (and seasonal biological surveys) to commence.

Similarly, we will work with our transportation team (Fehr & Peers) to advance the preparation of traffic volumes independent of the Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR) and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis to allow our air quality, climate change, and noise analyses to commence early. * Noise. Michael Baker understands the complexity of noise analyses under the Caltrans SER, and the sequential nature of the process that can often result in delays. Based on our experience with similar interchange projects within District 8, Michael Baker will initiate the noise modeling process early during PA/ED, by advancing Fehr & Peers generation of necessary traffic volumes ahead of the TOAR and VMT analyses. This will allow us to make an early determination as to whether we are required to evaluate noise attenuation (i.e., soundwalls), and if so, whether such attenuation is reasonable and/or feasible (via the Noise Abatement Decision Report, if necessary). This early determination is critical to maintaining the schedule for environmental milestones.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 13

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
▬ Resource Agency Concerns. The project is located within the Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; the project is also expected to result in impacts to jurisdictional waters. Preparation of a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) and acquisition of regulatory permits is anticipated. Michael Baker proposes early consultation meetings with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and other responsible agencies early during PA/ED (once limits of disturbance and associated riparian/riverine and jurisdictional impacts are determined). This will allow for the agencies to have clarity regarding the project’s impacts, anticipate agency concerns within the environmental document, and develop a mitigation strategy early to facilitate permit acquisition.se for design and construction in PS&E to save on costly environmental re-validation technical studies.
▬ Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). The issue of VMT and induced travel demand will be a key factor under CEQA. Based on our Team’s experience with similar interchange projects in District 8, we anticipate that the project will result in a VMT impact requiring mitigation. One of our critical paths will be to consult with Caltrans regarding potential options for mitigation should an EIR determination be made. We will facilitate every available option to mitigate impacts to a level below significance. ▬ Floodplain. Although the project site is not within a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (100-year floodplain), the project does lie within a State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Flood Awareness zone. The County of Riverside has adopted the DWR flood awareness mapping as a floodplain under Ordinance 458. Therefore, floodplain analysis using the Location Hydraulic Study and the Summary Floodplain Encroachment report will be necessary. The Flood Awareness zone will be evaluated like a FEMA Zone A floodplain.

Management Approach – Executing the Work Plan
Successful project delivery demands a logical project team structure, organized work plan, and well-planned management approach. Michael Baker’s approach is based on the establishment of an overall Project Management Plan that defines roles and responsibilities of our Team leadership, parameters for implementing the scope of services, and use of communication tools to ensure effective coordination amongst the entire project team. It also implements various proven project controls and resource management techniques as demonstrated in the following pages.

Project Schedule Delivery Control & Acceleration Strategies The Michael Baker Team’s experience in successful PA/ED and PS&E delivery of interchange projects makes us uniquely capable of seizing opportunities to deliver on the project schedule. Our plan to achieve this objective is described below.

The First 60 Days – Establishing Momentum. A key to Michael Baker’s past success in project delivery has been establishing solid direction and momentum in the first 60 days. Many of our tasks in the first 60 days have been described in detail in this approach. Most important will be the establishment of clear communication channels with the project team. Among other standard tasks we will review available data, obtain design level topography, coordinate with the traffic team in order initiate the formal updates, and strategize with City management on other fast-tracking measures.

Maintaining Momentum Month-to-Month
Once a project foundation is set in the first 60 days or less, the focus will shift to implementing proactive strategies that maintain positive momentum from month-to-month. Establishing technical work groups with Michael Baker, the City, and Caltrans functional units outside of the monthly Project Development Team (PDT) meetings. Conducting weekly internal Michael Baker project Team meetings is a key element to ensure focus on action item resolution, progress status, and project team resource assignments.

Risk Management
Caltrans’ Project Delivery Directive outlined new expectations in risk management, from a scalable standpoint. The SR-60/ Redlands Boulevard interchange project PSR-PDS identified risks to carry forward to the PA/ED phase. Twenty (20) potential risks were identified. The probability and impact vary with each one, these risks require close attention throughout the project. These risks will be monitored and updated during this PA/ED phase utilizing the most current Caltrans approved Risk Register.

Schedule Acceleration
Based on our strategic time saving ideas and unique local insights to the project issues, we believe that we can accelerate crucial initial tasks such as traffic analysis, design topography, and alternatives screening so that the environmental technical studies can begin in the fall. After biological studies are completed in the spring the Draft Environmental Document (DED) will be ready to circulate within one year of NTP. We are also proposing to complete design level GAD in this phase in order to being PS$E at the 65% design level- saving many months in schedule. Please see Figure 7 below for a graphic of these time saving strategies.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 14

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
Schedule Control
The project schedule is a critical tool in managing the SR-60/ Redlands Blvd. Interchange project. There are several elements that maximize schedule effectiveness, such as:
▬ Ease of information being shared and understood.
▬ Commitment is obtained from each functional leader and the project Team. ▬ Inter-relationship of tasks is shown, including internal QC/QA and agency review periods. ▬ Risk Management planning and accountability checks are shown throughout the project duration. ▬ Easy and flexible to update monthly.
▬ Consideration of office-wide correlations of staffing and project commitments.

Specific critical path items or decisions that affect project deliverables will be identified on a continual basis to ensure the project schedule is met. A consolidated tabular schedule of the next four to eight weeks of expected deliverables will be prepared using Microsoft Project for ease of quick reference for the PDT.

Budget
The project scope of work serves as the basis for development of the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and project schedule.

A budget expressed in dollars will be established for each task/subtask in our project cost accounting system. Furthermore, Les Hopper, PE (Principal Project Manager), Jerusalem Verano, PE (Deputy Project Manager), and all Michael Baker discipline leads have real-time access to cost data, enabling continuous monitoring of project costs. The WBS budget and schedule will be combined into a time-phased budget to allow for measuring progress and comparing planned versus actual expenditures, or physical percent complete, on both a monthly and cumulative period-to-date basis. Earned values will be computed for all activities and assessment of budgeted cost-of-work scheduled, budgeted cost-of-work performed, actual cost-of-work performed, and estimates to complete will be developed. This data will be reviewed regularly with all our discipline leaders to allow for continuous monitoring, identification of early warnings of budget or schedule issues, and development of required corrective actions.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
The SR-60 / Redlands Boulevard Interchange demands a comprehensive QC/QA Program to ensure timely and successful project delivery. Michael Baker’s QC/QA Program is a continuous process used at project milestones and daily as workflows from desk to desk, discipline to discipline, subconsultant to consultant, and consultant to client.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 15

PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
The QA/QC Plan will be written specifically for the SR-60/ Redlands Boulevard Interchange and will be overseen by our project QA/QC manager Danny Walden, PE. The plan consists of a series of requirements and procedures for defining the QC/QA measures to be implemented. The foundation of this Plan is based on a collaborative process of interdisciplinary and constructability reviews, and a detailed color-coded plan checking process.

Our recent work on the adjacent WLC interchange required the submittal of a project specific Quality Management Plan (QMP).

It establishes procedures that will be followed by Michael Baker International and its subconsultant(s) (the Michael Baker Team).

All Michael Baker Team members are required to become
familiar with and follow these procedures. It is reviewed and approved by both the City and Caltrans. Please see the image below for an example of our recently approved plan.

The QMP is implemented throughout the performance of
the project and is intended to ensure that the reports, plans, specifications, studies, estimates, and other documents submitted to client and appropriate agencies are complete, accurate, checked, and proofread in accordance with this QMP. Michael Baker International will perform periodic audits on design and document submittals to verify the procedures established in this QMP are being followed.

Communication Plan
Michael Bakers believes that regular and effective communication with the City, the Project Development Team (PDT), and other key stakeholders is paramount to successful project delivery. In addition to regularly scheduled monthly PDT meetings, our Principal Project Manager, Les Hopper, PE, and Deputy Project Manager, Jerusalem Verano, PE, will hold weekly internal coordination meetings to ensure that our Team meets scheduled milestones. We also foster regular dialogue with key staff and outside agencies as needed- in this case utility agencies and local developers. A standard agenda will be used for each project meeting, and regular meeting minutes and other project decision documentation will be distributed to the team.

Work Plan / List of Deliverables and Current Workload
The Michael Baker Team Work Plan / List of Delvierables has been included on the following pages. Michael Baker is fully committed to allocating the resources for this project. The availability of our proposed key personnel has been included in the key personnel section summaries on Page 26.

Michael Baker Quality Managment Plan
Prepared for SR-60 World Logistics Center Parkway
Interchange Project
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

WORK PLAN / LIST OF DELIVERABLES
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 16 Work Plan
Task No. Task Name Required Actions Deliverables Responsible Firm 100 Perform Project Management
100.10
100.10.10
Project Management – PA/ED Component
PA/ED Component Execution and Control & Quality Management Plan
• Provide overall execution and financial management of the Project and coordination and supervision of project staff • Prepare Quality Management Plan (QMP) to establish QA/QC processes • Prepare a Project Management Plan (PMP) with a Communication Plan, Risk Register, and Project Master Schedule • Submit a Work Plan for communication management, risk management, and resource management • Meet with PDT and stakeholders to discuss and resolve issues pertinent to analysis, design, and potential impacts • Coordinate monthly Progress Meetings with the PDT and other meetings with external agencies • Submit monthly progress report and invoices
• Project invoices; Monthly progress reports
• QMP
• Agency coordination/technical workshop meeting notes, agenda, handouts, and record of action items; Project files (2 sets) • Project Management Plan; Project Master Schedule
• Risk Register
• Project Master Schedule
Michael Baker
160 Perform Preliminary Engineering Studies and Prepare Draft Project Report 160.05
160.05.05-35
Review and Update Project Information
Review Approved Previous Feasibility Studies, PID & Project Alternatives; Geotechnical Information; Material Information; Traffic Data and Forecasts; Previous Geometrics; Previous Project Cost Estimates
• Review information assembled and developed during previous phases/assess need for additional information. • Review project scope and alternatives and update/review existing geotechnical information obtained for PID • Review traffic studies, projections, and analyses/geometric plans and estimates from PID • Understanding of project purpose and need, scope, and cost • Identify any additional studies that may be required
• Summary memorandum of additional information/assessments if required
Michael Baker,
Leighton,
Monument,
Fehr & Peers
160.10 Perform Engineering Studies
160.10.10 Traffic Forecast/Modeling
VMT Study
• Utilize existing and collect new traffic count data in support of volume analysis • Conduct an extensive QA/QC effort to affirm that the traffic forecasts are reasonable • Develop existing and horizon year traffic volume forecasts for the No Build and Build alternatives • Existing Traffic Counts and Traffic Model Demand model, and MicroSimulation Models • Volumes Report
Fehr & Peers,
Michael Baker
160.10.15 Prepare Geometric Plan for Project Alternatives/Constructability Review
• Prepare geometric plans for alternativesthat include horizontal and vertical alignments, typical sections, grading limits, potential right of way and environmental impacts, drainage, utility, geotechnical and other road elements on strip map • Perform constructability review to assess construction access, construction work zone areas, and traffic handling • Refine and generate geometric plans for Project Alternatives • Summary of constructability findings
Michael Baker,
160.10.16 Modified Access Report (OPTIONAL TASK) • Consultant with Caltrans on if a Modified Access Report (MAR) is required to document the reconfiguration of the interchange • Draft/Final Modified Access Report Michael Baker 160.10.17 Construction Staging/Traffic Handling • Develop a construction staging concept for the Project Alternatives to verify constructability and feasibility of traffic handling • Construction Staging/Traffic Handling Concepts Michael Baker 160.10.20 Value Analysis
• Use independent team of experienced staff to evaluate the build alternatives being developed to ascertain their effectiveness with regards to costs, time of delivery, and other benefits • Conduct VA Implementation meeting to finalize VA Study recommendations • Draft/Final Value Analysis Study Report
• VA Implementation Meeting VMS
160.10.25 Perform Hydraulics/Hydrology Studies • Identify drainage impacts including the relocation or realignment of adjacent channels and storm drains • Determine drainage improvements for on-site and off-site drainage facilities • Hydraulics/Hydrology Report Michael Baker 160.10.26 Storm Water Data Report • Develop a SWDR to identify the selection and design of BMPs for the build alternatives • Draft/Final SWDR Michael Baker 160.10.30 Highway Planting Design Concepts • Analyze existing landscape, aesthetics and develop planting concepts • Highway Planting Concept Report Michael Baker 160.10.35 Perform Traffic Operational Analysis
• Evaluate the LOS that will result from alternatives/Existing year, opening year, and horizon year • Prepare Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR) for the project build alternatives •
• Traffic Operational Analysis Report (TOAR)/Model Calibration Memo • Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE)
• VMT Study & Mitigation Scoping Plan Fehr & Peers
160.10.40 Review and Update Right-of-Way (ROW) Data Sheet • Assess R/W requirements and prepare R/W cost estimates • Prepare utility cost information for R/W data sheets • Geometric plans showing R/W impacts / R/W Impacts Report Monument, Michael Baker
160.10.45 Utility Locations Determined for Preliminary Engineering • Identify existing utility locations, needs, inspect facilities, and prepare utility estimate for inclusion in the R/W Data Sheets
• Prepare Utility Matrix and track agency facility correspondence, impacts and betterments • Utility Matrix
• Utility as-builts / agency facility maps added to CAD base maps Michael Baker 160.10.70 Traffic Studies
• Prepare Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Report
• Evaluate and prepare VMT Documentation. Develop a VMT mitigation scoping plan an Induce Travel Risk Assessment.
• Provide feedback to the Environmental Document specialist regarding the traffic studies • Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Report
• VMT Documentation Fehr & Peers
160.10.71 Overhead Sign and Electrical Concept Plan • Prepare concept plan for overhead signs and electrical facilities for purpose of establishing proper environmental footprint and R/W needs • Overhead Sign and Electrical Concept Plan Michael Baker 160.10.72 Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) • Evaluate the long-term economic efficiency between competing pavement options • Draft/Final LCCA Michael Baker 160.10.75 Prepare/Update Materials Information for Project Report • Identify material sites and any required lab testing • Materials Information Report Leighton 160.10.80 Prepare/Update Geotechnical Information • Identify subsurface conditions for each planned structure and establish preliminary geotechnical recommendations for the structure modifications, pavement materials, corrosion, cuts/fills, ADL Testing • Geotechnical Studies Reports (Materials, Foundation, Design, ADL) Leighton I.19.b
Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

WORK PLAN / LIST OF DELIVERABLES
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 17 Task No. Task Name Required Actions Deliverables Responsible Firm 160.10.85 Prepare Structures Advanced Planning Studies
• Evaluate the impacts of each alternative on each affected structures • Consider stage construction, bridge type and construction methods to reduce grading and right of way needs • Develop a preliminary cost estimate/analysis of construction feasibility for proposed structure improvements • Structure Advanced Planning Study Report Michael Baker 160.10.95 Prepare/Update Preliminary Transportation Management Plan • Prepare/update the TMP and TMP Data Sheet • TMP Report, including construction planning and sequencing Michael Baker 160.15 Prepare Draft Project Report
160.15.05
160.15.10
160.15.15
160.15.20
160.15.25
Prepare Cost Estimates for Alternatives
Prepare DSDD for Exceptions to Design Standards
Obtain Approval for Exceptions to Encroachment Policy
Prepare Draft Project Report
Circulate, Review & Approve Draft Project Report
• Prepare Cost Estimates for Alternatives
• Prepare Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD) for Exceptions to Design Standards • Prepare and document any exceptions to encroachment policy • Prepare/Finalize Draft Project Report
• Alternative cost estimates
• DSDD for Boldfaced and Underlined Design Standards
• Encroachment Policy Exceptions Report
• Draft Project Report/Approved Draft Project Report
Michael Baker
160.20 Project Control Surveys, Mapping and Initial Land Net Mapping for Project Report 160.20.05-15
160.20.16
160.20.20
160.20.25
160.20.30a
160.20.30b
160.20.35
Perform Corridor (Basic) Control Surveys for Project Report Base Mapping
Review Base Photogrammetric Maps
Perform Preliminary Record Data Search for Project Report Perform Initial Land Net Recovery & Field Ties for Project Report Conduct Design Surveys
Perform Preliminary Boundary Determination for Project Report (Land Net Map)
• Prepare survey request, plan/research, perform field survey, process/adjust data, and preparing survey corridor control map • Provide full Project Control Surveys, building off Corridor Control Surveys • Review and assess existing aerial topographic mapping and amend as required • Research/review assessors’ records and available mapping • Perform design field survey for any key existing features as determined by Roadway Engineers, such as at project join locations
• Evaluate existing R/W data, grid positioning, and map existing R/W and affected property boundaries • Corridor Survey Control Maps
• Field Survey Data
• Preliminary boundary mapping from record mapping data Michael Baker
165 Perform Environmental Studies and Prepare Draft Environmental Document 165.05 Perform Environmental Scoping and Select Alternatives for Study 165.05.05 Review Project Information • Obtain and examine information from prior stages related to the environmental evaluation • Published NOP • Public Participation Plan
• MPO/APCD comments on and concurrence with Public Participation Plan • Minutes, Records of Meetings, Newsletters, press materials • Project Mailing List
• Agency and Public Scoping Meetings/Exhibits/Handouts
• Scoping Summary Report/Public Participation Report
• Alternative selection memo and NOP/NOI alternatives discussion • Adequate project maps for initiation of environmental studies • Technical Study Work Plans
Michael Baker
165.05.10 Arellano, TAHA
165.05.11
165.05.15
165.05.20a
165.05.20b
Perform Public and Agency Scoping & Community Outreach
Process
Supplemental Outreach
Select Alternatives for Further Study
Prepare Maps for Environmental Evaluation
Technical Study Work Plans
• Prepare written notification of initiation of environmental studies • Prepare Notice of Preparation (NOP)/conduct NOP scoping meeting • Conduct and document public agency and scoping meetings and open house and workshop meetings • Prepare and coordinate with MPO/RTPA and Tribal Transportation Planning Agency • Review comments from the public agencies and scoping meetings/Prepare a comprehensive scoping summary report
• Prepare and circulate newsletter and other press materials/Prepare and maintain project mailing list • Yearly supplemental outreach will be held with local agency technical staff members • Prepare environmental study maps for the alternatives selected for future studies • Develop Technical Study Work Plans
165.10 Perform General Environmental Studies All environmental studies will include Technical Report Abstract for Use in Environmental Document Text and Transmittal Memo with Proposed Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Effectiveness Evaluation 165.10.10 Perform Surveys and GIS Mapping for Environmental Studies • Prepare for/perform field surveys required for environmental studies • Prepare base mapping/GIS maps identifying the location of environmental attributes • GIS maps that are compatible with new topographic mapping Michael Baker 165.10.13 Obtain Right of Entry for Environmental Studies • Identify properties where access is needed • Prepare a mailing list of property owners where rights of entry are needed/Prepare the permit to enter letter • Record conversations with the public/Maintain a spreadsheet tracking information on each property • GIS mapping and mailing list of affected property owners • Request for Permit to Enter for each property owner
• Records of all conversations held with the public
Michael Baker,
Monument
165.10.15 Perform Community Impact Analysis, Land Use & Growth Studies • Perform all activities related to socioeconomic, land use, and growth impact technical studies • Prepare a technical report documenting study results
• Community Impact Assessment Report and supporting GIS maps and data • Farmlands/Agricultural Lands Impact Assessment Report Michael Baker,
Monument
165.10.20 Perform Visual Impact Analysis & Scenic Resource Evaluation • Prepare all activities related to Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) and Scenic Resource Evaluation (SRE) • Prepare a technical report documenting study results
• Visual Simulations (Computer Software) and Exhibits
• Visual Impact Assessment/Scenic Resource Evaluation
Michael Baker
165.10.25 Perform Noise Study • Perform all activities related to noise impact analysis • Document and prepare a technical report documenting study results • Noise Study Report with GIS mapping
• Preliminary Noise Barrier Plans
TAHA
165.10.26 Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) • Present the preliminary noise abatement decision based on acoustical and non-acoustical feasibility factors and the relationship between noise abatement allowances and the engineer’s cost estimate • Draft Traffic NADR
• Draft Final Traffic NADR/Final Traffic NADR
TAHA
165.10.30 Perform Air Quality Study • Perform all activities related to air quality impact analysis for use in the environmental document • Prepare a technical report documenting study results (Air Quality Report) • Prepare standalone Air Quality Conformity Report
• Report on guidance/recommendations for the Air Quality Study and Health Risk Assessment
• Air Quality Report/Air Quality Conformity Checklist/Documentation • Health Risk Assessment Report/Monitoring Report
TAHA
165.10.35 Perform Water Quality & Stormwater Runoff Studies and Water Quality Assessment Report (WQAR)
• Evaluate the potential impacts on water quality that may be caused by the direct introduction of pollutants into surface bodies of water, the alteration of surface drainage patterns, and changes to area groundwater levels • WQAR, including identification of possible BMPs
• Storm Water Runoff Studies/Documentation
Michael Baker
165.10.40 Perform Energy Studies • Perform all activities related to energy impact analysis and prepare a technical report documenting study results • Energy Analysis Report TAHA 165.10.45 Summary of Geotechnical Report • Prepare a geotechnical report that addresses the existing settings, geology, seismicity, ground shaking, and topography • Geotechnical Evaluation Report Leighton 165.10.50 Perform Preliminary Site Investigation (PSI) for Hazardous Waste
• Identify existing hazardous materials and waste sites, extent of contamination, and remediation measures • Perform all activities related to one or more PSIs as defined under procedures • Phase I ISA Leighton
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

WORK PLAN / LIST OF DELIVERABLES
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 18 Task No. Task Name Required Actions Deliverables Responsible Firm 165.10.65 Perform Paleontology Studies • Identify and evaluate paleontological resources • Develop preliminary mitigation plans, if necessary
• Paleontological Identification Report (PIR)
• Paleontological Evaluation Report (PER)
Michael Baker
165.15 • Biological/Cultural Resource Studies
165.15.10
165.15.15
165.15.20
165.20
165.20.05
165.20.05.05
165.20.05.10
165.20.05.15
165.20.10
Prepare Wetlands & Other Waters of the U.S. Studies
Resource Agency Permit Related Coordination
Natural Environment Study (NES) Report
Cultural Resource Studies
Conduct Archaeological Survey
Prepare Area of Potential Effects
Native American Consultation
Historical Records & Literature Search
Perform Historical, Architectural & Archaeological Resource Studies
• Perform all tasks related to identifying, studying project effects on, and determining mitigation for wetlands • Perform formal consultation and coordination required in order to complete biological studies • Gain consensus with the resource agencies on the impacts and mitigations necessary for completion of the DED • Prepare a NES report covering compliance with biological study and consultation requirements • Perform studies for cultural resources (archaeological, historical, and architectural reports) • Perform pre-field research, pedestrian archaeological survey, site recording, report writing, and consultation • Prepare an APE map illustrating the project limits for the SR-60/ Redlands Blvd Interchange Project • Consult with Native American groups to determine if project affects historic properties • Review California Historical Resources Information Systems (CHRIS) Information Center’s records, historical society archives, Caltrans records, etc. to determine archaeological sensitivity and develop background context • Review Caltrans Historic Bridge Inventory to identify bridges potentially eligible for inclusion on National Register • Wetland Delineation Report
• Letter of concurrence on wetland findings from the ACOE • Documentation of various types of consultation, coordination, and permits for inclusion in other biological study reports • Natural Environmental Study Report (NES)
• Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR)
• Historical Resource Evaluation Report (HRER)
• Documentation that demonstrates regulations compliance • Archaeological Survey Report (ASR)
• APE Map
Michael Baker
165.25 Prepare Draft Environmental Document
165.25.10
165.25.20
165.25.25
165.25.30
Prepare Section 4(f) Evaluation
Conduct Environmental Quality Control & Other Reviews
Obtain Approval to Circulate
Perform Environmental Coordination
• Prepare Draft Environmental Document (DED) with all attachments • Conduct all necessary in-house and external reviews (NEPA and CEQA documents) • Obtain FHWA approval to circulate DED
• Prepare a draft Section 4(f) De Minimis Determination at the direction of the PDT, as required • Conduct formal and informal review of DED within the PDT • Complete Pre-Draft of DED for PDTs QA/QC review and revise • Complete Draft EIS/EIS (after approval to circulate to the public received from FHWA)
• Draft Section 4(f) De Minimis Determination and documentation of coordination
• Draft Quality Control Certification
• Completed FHWA DED Checklist and completed MCCR Form
Michael Baker
175 Circulate Draft Environmental Document and Select Preferred Project Alternative 175.05
175.10
175.15
175.20
Circulate Draft Environmental Document
Prepare for & Hold Public Meetings
Respond to Public Comments & Correspondence
Select Preferred Alternative
• Circulate the DED
• Prepare the distribution list for all interested individuals, groups, and governmental agencies • Prepare and issue a Notice of Availability and mail notifications of the public hearing • Transmit DED to CTC
• Arrange for all public hearing logistics, prepare displays and attend public hearing • Prepare a formal response to comments on the DED and select a preferred alternative • Public Hearing Strategy
• Public Hearing Displays
• Record of Public Hearing(s)
• Summary of Public Comments, with draft responses
• Minutes documenting the selection of the Preferred Alternative Michael Baker,
Arellano
180 Prepare and Approve Project Report
180.05 Review and Approve Project
180.05.05
180.05.10
180.05.15
Update Draft Project Report
Approved Project Report
Updated Storm Water Data Report
• Update the Project Report to include the Preferred Alternative selection and update the cost estimate • Prepare Updated SWDR
• Obtain reviews and approval of Project Report
• Approved Project Report
• Approved SWDR
Michael Baker
180.10 Prepare and Approve Final Environmental Document 180.10.05
180.10.10
180.10.15
180.15
Approved Final Environmental Document (FED)
Public Distribution of FED/Response to Comments on the FED Prepare Final R/W Relocation Impact Report
Complete Environmental Document/NOD/SOL/ECR
• Update the DED to identify the rationale for the selection of the Preferred Alternative • Incorporate response to comments into an appendix of the FED and revise FED accordingly • Circulate the FED for District review and required QA/QC review • Finalize the Section 4(f) evaluation per public/outside agency comments/Complete Section 106 Consultation • Receive approval on MND/FONSI Notice of Determination (NOD) and complete Notice of Completion (NOC) • Complete and update the Draft Relocation Impact Report • Prepare Environmental Commitments Record (ECR) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Record (MMRR) • Complete MND/FONSI with NOD
• Section 4(f) evaluation (de minimis)
• Final Relocation Impact Memorandum
• ECR
• MMRR
Michael Baker,
Arellano
185 Prepare Base Maps and Plan Sheets for PS&E
185.15 Preliminary Design
180.15.05 Roadway Design
Geometric Reviews
Design Exceptions
• Prepare Geometric Approval Drawing for the PA/ED Build Alternatives • Refine the Preferred Alternative GAD drawing to serve as the 30% basis of design for the PS&E phase • Display nonstandard design features, traffic data, staging, alignments, superelevation, grading, typical sections, intersection design, pedestrian and bike facilities, lane assignments and overall project features • Geometric Approval Drawing
• GAD in Lieu of 30% Submittal Memorandum (Caltrans)
Michael Baker
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 19

EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Michael Baker provided environmental services
for the Riverside County Transportation
Department (RCTD) by preparing an initial
study/environmental assessment (IS/EA) and
a full suite of technical studies. The company
coordinated extensively with Caltrans District
8 as the lead agency under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

Key environmental issues addressed included
biological resources, noise, cultural resources,
and air quality. Michael Baker successfully
obtained and approved a project study report/
project development support (PSR-PDS) and
delivered the project approval/environmental
document (PA/ED) phase.

The I-10/Cherry Valley Boulevard interchange,
located between Singleton Road and Oak
Valley Parkway, serves as a major access
point for existing and proposed residential
and commercial development. Calimesa,
in cooperation with Caltrans District 8 and
Riverside County, proposed improvements
at the interchange to relieve congestion and
improve traffic operations resulting from
development in the city and surrounding area.

The existing configuration was a diamond
interchange with stop control at the ramp
termini, consisting of one lane on the on- and
off-ramps. Cherry Valley Boulevard served as
an arterial in Calimesa.

During the PA/ED phase, the team analyzed
two build alternatives: a diverging diamond
interchange and a partial cloverleaf.

Michael Baker’s Primary Role:
▬ Project Study Report / Project
Development Support (PSR-PDS)
▬ Project Approval / Environmental
Document (PA/ED)
▬ Alternative Analysis
▬ Agency Coordination
▬ Initial Study / Environmental Assessment
(IS/EA)
I-10 AND CHERRY BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PA/ED
Calimesa, California
Agency Name:

Riverside County
Transportation
Department (RCTD)
2950 Washington St,
Riverside, CA 92504
Dates: 2018-2023
Reference
Information:

John Ashlock
RCTD
(951) 955-1511
[email protected]

CHALLENGE: Relieve traffic congestion and improve traffic operations resulting form development in the City and the surronding area.

SOLUTION: Analyzed and proposed two build alternatives that ultimately led to a diverging diamond interchange becoming the proposed alternative for PS&E.

PROJECT CHALLENGE

AND SOLUTION

REFERENCE PROJECTS
1 I.19.b
Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 20

EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Michael Baker International was recently
awarded a contract by the City of Moreno Valley
in Riverside, California, to prepare final design
documents for the reconstruction and improvement of the interchange located at State Route 60 (SR-60) and World Logistics Center (WLC)
Parkway.

This project considered a signature cable-stayed pedestrian and bicycle facility over SR-60, in addition to two standard vehicle
bridges. Other unique features include roundabouts at both freeway access ramps and the nearest adjacent street, as well as aesthetic treatments to the vehicle bridges and the surrounding landscape. The interchange
will support the continued expansion of the
adjacent World Logistics Center, a development
of almost 50 million square feet of planned
logistics facilities and associated infrastructure
to facilitate goods movements into and out of
southern California. The WLC Project is an
unprecedented effort to create the largest, most
efficient and most advanced logistics center in
the United States.

The approximately $80 million interchange was
initiated by local developer Highland Fairview
and the City of Moreno Valley, and it will include
coordination with the California Department
of Transportation (Caltrans) District 8 , among
other stakeholders.

The Michael Baker team created virtual renderings (pictured above) for this project, which were key in convincing the local stakeholders
on the bridge location and aesthetics.

SR-60/WORLD LOGISITCS CENTER PARKWAY INTERCHANGE PA/ED & PS&E Moreno Valley, California
Agency Name:

City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA
92552
Dates: 2014-2020
Reference
Information:

Harold Zamora, PE
City of Moreno Valley
(951) 413-3106
[email protected]
Quang Nguyen, PE,
MPA
City of Moreno Valley
(951) 413-3159
[email protected]
CHALLENGE: Address nonstandard bridge vertical clearance while balancing fill, and developments south of the interchange.

SOLUTION: Michael Baker is utilizing an alternative bridge construction method, such as cast-high and lower, to lower the final bridge vertical clearance. This reduced the amount of fill required and impacts to right of way and entitled developments.

PROJECT CHALLENGE

AND SOLUTION
2 I.19.b
Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 21

EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Michael Baker prepared two project study
report – project development support (PSRPDS) documents to streamline the project initiation document (PID) phase for each
interchange.

The documents identified the need for
interchange improvements and determined
the capital and support costs for the project
approval/environmental document (PA/ED);
plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E);
and construction. The documents followed
the new PDPM Appendix S guidelines.

Three alternatives were evaluated for each
interchange, including the no-build alternative.

Two build alternatives were proposed in the
PSR-PDS: Alternative 2 - Tight Diamond,
and Alternative 3 - Single Point Interchange
(SPI). The traffic engineering performance
assessment (TEPA) assessed a variety of
different interchange configurations during
the PSR-PDS phase using available land
use and traffic data. Alternatives considered
included a diverging diamond interchange
(DDI), roundabouts, and a partial cloverleaf
interchange (parclo).

The parclo, roundabouts, and DDI did
not meet the initial traffic level of service
(LOS) acceptable thresholds during PSRPDS. Therefore, they were not considered viable alternatives. The build alternatives
addressed the existing capacity deficiencies,
removed the existing bottlenecks, and
accommodated growth and development using
context sensitive solution design, such as a
neighborhood electric vehicles (NEV) path and
connection with the adjacent planned CVLink
Active Transportation trail.

Michael Baker streamlined the preparation of
both documents to maintain momentum with
the current growth of the Coachella Valley
region. By executing both interchange PSRPDS’s simultaneously, this enabled the city to compete for funding and advance to the PA/ED
phase on these highly prioritized projects.

I-10/MONROE STREET INTERCHANGE PSR, PA/ED, AND PS&E
I-10/JACKSON STREET INTERCHANGE PSR AND PS&E
Indio,California
Agency Name:

Riverside County
Transportation
Department (RCTD)
2950 Washington St,
Riverside, CA 92504
Dates: 2017-2023
Reference
Information:

John Ashlock
Riverside County
(951) 955-1511
[email protected]
CHALLENGE: Implementation of a Cycle Track within the project corridor after PS&E had already started; this was something not envisions during the PA/ED phase.

SOLUTION: Our Team held frequent focus meetings with City and Caltrans to gain concurrence on the new cross-section of the corridor, ensuring the intent of the Cycle Track was implemented, while also managing the safety concerns of Caltrans.

PROJECT CHALLENGE

AND SOLUTION
3 I.19.b
Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 22

EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

KEY SUBCONSULTANTS AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Firm Summary and Relevant Projects (Name, Client)
For 30 years, Arellano Associates (Arellano) has specialized in communications and public outreach, community and government relations, and strategic planning and marketing programs as a professional services consulting firm. Arellano is a woman-owned and minority-owned certified Small Business-owned (SBE) and Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE). ▬ I-10 Highland Springs Interchange Improvements PA/ED, RCTC ▬ SR-60 Truck Lanes Environmental Services, Caltrans
Responsibilities:

Communications,
Public Outreach, and
Strategic Planning
For 63 years, Leighton has provided geotechnical, environmental, and soils and materials testing and inspection services for the planning, design, and construction of engineered structures and public infrastructure California. Leighton has been a part of more than 50 Caltrans District 8 projects, including express way projects, bridge and interchange improvements, pavement rehabilitations, etc. ▬ SR-/WLC Parkway Interchange, City of Moreno Valley
▬ I-15 Corridor Improvement/Express Lanes, RCTC
Responsibilities:

Geotechnical,
Environmental, Soils
and Materials Testing
Value Management Strategies, Inc. (VMS) is a California SBE consulting firm specializing in value engineering (VE) services. VMS routinely facilitates VE studies for Caltrans and Caltrans’ major transportation partners at the city, county, and RTPA/MPO level, as well as routinely performs VE studies for projects involving the state highway system and local roadway infrastructure. ▬ I-10 Pavement Rehabilitation Project PA/ED (Riverside County), Caltrans ▬ SR-79 Safety Project PA/ED (Riverside County), Caltrans Responsibilities:

Value Engineering
Monument, a DBE, SBE, and WBE certified firm, is a full-service real estate and right-of-way company providing exceptional service, strategic planning, innovation, and timely delivery. Monument serves local, state, and federal agencies, transportation authorities, and engineering partners with public infrastructure projects throughout California.
▬ I-15 Railroad Canyon Road Interchange, RCTC
▬ Meadowlark Road Improvement Project, City of Murietta Responsibilities:

Right-of-Way and
Utility Coordination
Firm
Established in 1976, Utility Specialists Southwest provides natural gas, electric, telephone and cable television system design and extension negotiation services. Utility Specialists and its affiliates are staffed by project managers with extensive dry utility experience, servicing projects across California with computer-aided natural gas, electric, telephone, and cable television design capability. ▬ Citywide Undergrounding Project, City of San Diego
▬ Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, Transportation Corridor Agency of Orange County Responsibilities:

Dry Utility Coordination
and Relocation
for PS&E
Terry A. Hayes Associates Inc. (TAHA) is an environmental and urban planning firm that has been providing clients with environmental impact assessment and environmental planning services since 1984. TAHA has prepared over 30 technical studies for Caltrans Local Assistance Projects. Many of these studies were prepared in accordance with the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference. ▬ I-10/Robertson Boulevard Interchange Improvement Project, City of Los Angeles ▬ SR-99/120 Interchange Connector Project, San Joaquin Council of Governments Responsibilities:

Air Quality, GH
Emissions, Energy,
Noise Study
Fehr & Peers is passionate about transforming transportation consulting through innovation and creativity. The firm is working on the TEPA for the SR-60/Redlands Interchange PSR/PDS, and has worked with the City of Moreno Valley on their General Plan Update, peer review for the World Logistics Center, Nason Street Corridor Study, and on a variety of other projects for private developers.

Additionally, Fehr & Peers assisted the city with their systemic safety study. ▬ SR-60/Redlands Interchange, City of Moreno Valley
▬ I-15/Central Avenue PA/ED, City of Lake Elsinore
Responsibilities:

Traffic Operations
Analysis, ICE, VMT, &
Environmental Tech.

Study Support
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

PA/ED RESOURCE ALLOCATION MATRIX
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 23 City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PA/ED Fee Proposal
Classifications Bridge Principal Bridge Engineer Bridge CADD SR. PROJECT

MANAGER

TECHNICAL

MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER
Task No. Task Description $334.61 $158.95 $189.50 $407.49 $292.55 $224.08

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0 0 0 138 44 236

2.0 PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 36 226 130 24 82 405

3.0 PREPARE DRAFT PROJECT REPORT 0 0 0 20 50 164

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL STUDIES 0 0 0 0 64 20

5.0 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 0 0 0 0 127 22

6.0 APPROVED PROJECT REPORT AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 0 0 0 0 38 45 Total Hours: 36 226 130 182 405 892
Michael Baker International, Inc.

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PA/ED Fee Proposal
SENIOR

ENGINEER

PROJECT

ENGINEER

LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECT BIOLOGIST ENVIRONMENTAL

SPECIALIST
SR.

ENVIRONMENTAL

SPECIALIST
DESIGN

ENGINEER

ENVIRONMENTAL

ANALYST

DESIGNER /

PLANNER

UTILITY

COORDINATOR

ASSISTANT

ENGINEER /

PLANNER

SURVEY TASK

MANAGER
$195.04 $158.21 $198.51 $273.86 $147.01 $185.49 $136.42 $119.70 $119.11 $126.71 $111.13 $323.59 36 254 0 0 0 0 88 0 0 0 44 0
48 384 0 40 0 40 210 0 200 80 283 8
56 382 0 0 0 0 276 0 210 0 226 0
0 110 10 54 250 447 78 710 0 0 0 0
0 32 0 0 324 148 0 947 0 0 0 0
0 90 0 0 150 150 40 350 60 0 0 0
140 1252 10 94 724 785 692 2007 470 80 553 8

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PA/ED Fee Proposal
Classifications Bridge Principal Bridge Engineer Bridge CADD SR. PROJECT

MANAGER

TECHNICAL

MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER
Task No. Task Description $334.61 $158.95 $189.50 $407.49 $292.55 $224.08

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0 0 0 138 44 236

2.0 PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 36 226 130 24 82 405

3.0 PREPARE DRAFT PROJECT REPORT 0 0 0 20 50 164

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL STUDIES 0 0 0 0 64 20

5.0 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 0 0 0 0 127 22

6.0 APPROVED PROJECT REPORT AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 0 0 0 0 38 45 Total Hours: 36 226 130 182 405 892
Michael Baker International, Inc.

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PA/ED Fee Proposal

SURVEY PLS PROJECT

SURVEYOR SURVEY ANALYST TWO PERSON
CREW

DRAINAGE

MANAGER

DRAINAGE

PROJECT

ENGINEER

DRAINAGE CIVIL

ENGINEER

DRAINAGE

ASSISTANT

DRAINAGE

ENGINEER

DRAINAGE

ASSOCIATE

PROJECT

CONTROLS ADMIN
$202.76 $198.65 $150.70 $337.02 $308.22 $247.45 $148.43 $106.97 $136.23 $113.98 $101.60 $101.57 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 080 35
40 50 34 70 28 60 160 320 80 160 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 024
0 0 0 0 832 60 1600 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 060
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 020
40 50 34 70 36 92 220 480 80 160 80 139

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PA/ED Fee Proposal
Classifications Bridge Principal Bridge Engineer Bridge CADD SR. PROJECT

MANAGER

TECHNICAL

MANAGER PROJECT MANAGER
Task No. Task Description $334.61 $158.95 $189.50 $407.49 $292.55 $224.08

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0 0 0 138 44 236

2.0 PLANNING AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 36 226 130 24 82 405

3.0 PREPARE DRAFT PROJECT REPORT 0 0 0 20 50 164

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL STUDIES 0 0 0 0 64 20

5.0 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 0 0 0 0 127 22

6.0 APPROVED PROJECT REPORT AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT 0 0 0 0 38 45 Total Hours: 36 226 130 182 405 892
Michael Baker International, Inc.

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PA/ED Fee Proposal
Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours
955 0 0 0 0 0 0 0955
3,198 1,202 0 164 90 240 0 1,696 4,894
1,408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,408
2,003 0 0 0 82 0 570 652 2,655
1,660 0 910 0 0 0 0 910 2,570
943 0 0 0 0 0 0 0943
10,167 1,202 910 164 172 240 570 3,258 13,425
Total Michael
Baker Team
Hours
Total
Subconsultant(
s)
Monument VMS TAHA Total Michael
Baker Hours
Fehr & Peers Arrellano Leighton
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT

PS&E RESOURCE ALLOCATION MATRIX
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 24 City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PS&E Fee Proposal
Classifications Bridge Principal Bridge Engineer Bridge CADD PROJECT

PRINCIPAL
SR. PROJECT

MANAGER

TECHNICAL

MANAGER

PROJECT

MANAGER
Task No. Task Description $335.00 $159.00 $184.00 $408.00 $396.00 $293.00 $225.00

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0 0 0 0 20 90 156

2.0 Field Research and Reports 0 0 0 0 0 044

3.0 Utilities and Right of Way 0 0 0 0 0 68 40

4.0 Mitigate Environmental Impacts 0 0 0 0 0220

5.0 65% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0100

6.0 95% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 050

7.0 Structures Unchecked Details 65% Design 54 450 350 0 0 72 310

8.0 Structures 95% PS&E 36 445 250 0 0 149 174

9.0 100% PS&E and Final Structures 16 206 300 2 4 32 237

10.0 Construction Support (OPTIONAL) 0 150 0 0 0 0 244
Total Hours: 106 1251 900 2 24 433 1405
Michael Baker International, Inc.

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PS&E Fee Proposal
SENIOR

ENGINEER

PROJECT

ENGINEER

LANDSCAPE

ARCHITECT BIOLOGIST
SR.

ENVIRONMENTAL

SPECIALIST
DESIGN

ENGINEER

ENVIRONMENTAL

ANALYST

DESIGNER /

PLANNER

ASSISTANT

ENGINEER /

PLANNER

SURVEY TASK

MANAGER SURVEY PLS PROJECT

SURVEYOR
$196.00 $159.00 $199.00 $274.00 $186.00 $137.00 $120.00 $120.00 $112.00 $324.00 $203.00 $199.00 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 96 0 0 0 56 0 56 184 50 40 10
0 40 0 0 0 180 0 70 0 40 0 80
0 0 0 62 132 0 210 0 0 0 0 0
786 1,004 130 0 0 1,534 0 780 1,744 0 0 0
393 502 65 0 0 767 0 390 872 0 0 0
000000000
00000000
213 317 32 0 0 468 0 225
0 340 60 0 0 180 0 128
1392 2399 287 62 132 3185 210 1649 4144 90 40 90

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PS&E Fee Proposal
Classifications Bridge Principal Bridge Engineer Bridge CADD PROJECT

PRINCIPAL
SR. PROJECT

MANAGER

TECHNICAL

MANAGER

PROJECT

MANAGER
Task No. Task Description $335.00 $159.00 $184.00 $408.00 $396.00 $293.00 $225.00

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0 0 0 0 20 90 156

2.0 Field Research and Reports 0 0 0 0 0 044

3.0 Utilities and Right of Way 0 0 0 0 0 68 40

4.0 Mitigate Environmental Impacts 0 0 0 0 0220

5.0 65% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0100

6.0 95% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 050

7.0 Structures Unchecked Details 65% Design 54 450 350 0 0 72 310

8.0 Structures 95% PS&E 36 445 250 0 0 149 174

9.0 100% PS&E and Final Structures 16 206 300 2 4 32 237

10.0 Construction Support (OPTIONAL) 0 150 0 0 0 0 244
Total Hours: 106 1251 900 2 24 433 1405
Michael Baker International, Inc.

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PS&E Fee Proposal

SURVEY ANALYST TWO PERSON
CREW

DRAINAGE

MANAGER

DRAINAGE

PROJECT

ENGINEER

DRAINAGE CIVIL

ENGINEER

DRAINAGE

ASSISTANT

DRAINAGE

ENGINEER

DRAINAGE

ASSOCIATE

ADMIN/CONTROL
S
$151.00 $338.00 $309.00 $248.00 $144.00 $123.00 $137.00 $114.00 $102.00 Hours Hours 0 0200 0 0 0 060 44600
100 70 40 56 120 300 130 140 150 1,642 416 0
100 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 654 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 042600
0 0 40 100 180 0 300 400 0 7,098 0 0
0 0 8 50 90 0 110 180 0 3,477 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 01,2360 0
0 1,054 0 0
20 2,744 0 0
0 2,002 0 0
200 86 112 231 440 300 600 810 250 20,829 416 0
Monument Total Michael
Baker Hours
Leighton

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PS&E Fee Proposal
Classifications Bridge Principal Bridge Engineer Bridge CADD PROJECT

PRINCIPAL
SR. PROJECT

MANAGER

TECHNICAL

MANAGER

PROJECT

MANAGER
Task No. Task Description $335.00 $159.00 $184.00 $408.00 $396.00 $293.00 $225.00

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 0 0 0 0 20 90 156

2.0 Field Research and Reports 0 0 0 0 0 044

3.0 Utilities and Right of Way 0 0 0 0 0 68 40

4.0 Mitigate Environmental Impacts 0 0 0 0 0220

5.0 65% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 0100

6.0 95% PS&E 0 0 0 0 0 050

7.0 Structures Unchecked Details 65% Design 54 450 350 0 0 72 310

8.0 Structures 95% PS&E 36 445 250 0 0 149 174

9.0 100% PS&E and Final Structures 16 206 300 2 4 32 237

10.0 Construction Support (OPTIONAL) 0 150 0 0 0 0 244
Total Hours: 106 1251 900 2 24 433 1405
Michael Baker International, Inc.

City of Moreno Valley
SR-60 and Redlands Blvd Interchange PA/ED Project
PS&E Fee Proposal
Hours Hours
0 0 446
0 1,758 3,400
0 0 654
0 0 426
0 0 7,098
0 0 3,477
0 0 1,236
0 0 1,054
0 0 2,744
0 0 2,002
0 1,758 22,587
Total Michael
Baker Team
Hours
Utility
Specialist
Total
Subconsultant(
s)
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 25

PROPOSED TEAM AND KEY PERSONNEL

ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Environmental Analyst
Jessica Ditto
Allison Beauregard
Air Quality/GHG/Noise
Andres Southerland 6
Kieran Barthalow 6
Sam Silverman 6
Biological Resources
Ryan Henry
Jurisdictional Resources
Daniel Cardoza, PWS
Cultural/Tribe Resources
Marc Beherec, Ph.D, RPA
Paleontology
Peter Kloess
Community Impacts/
Environmental Justice
Frances Yau, AICP
Farmlands
Allison Beauregard
Visual Aesthetics
Kristen Bogue
Transportation/VMT
Jason Pack, TE 7
Paul Herrmann, TE 7
Hydrology/Floodplain
Bradley Losey, PE
Water Quality
Nora Jans, LEED AP
Hazardous Waste
Kristen Bogue
Section 4(f)
Jessica Ditto
Commuity Outreach
Margaret Meadows 1
Matthew Evans 1

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER

PROJECT TEAM
Michael Baker (Prime) ▪ Arellano 1 ▪ Leighton 2 ▪ Value Management Strategies 3 ▪ Monument 4 ▪ Utilities Specialists Southwest 5 ▪ Terry Hayes & Associates 6 ▪ Fehr and Peers 7

DEPUTY PROJECT MANAGER
Jerusalem Verano, PE

QA/QC - ENVIRONMENTAL
Rich Beck, CEP, PWS, CPESC®, CERP

QA/QC - ENGINEERING
Daniel Walden, PE

PRINCIPAL PROJECT MANAGER
Les Hopper, PE
Alan Ashimine
Traffic Modeling /
Operations Analysis
Diwu Zhou, PE, RSP 7
Geometrics
Patrick Cruz
Steven Alvarez, PE
Project Report
Andrew Lewis, PE, TE
Stormwater Data Report
Andrew Bjork, PE
Hydrology/Drainage
Bradley Losey, PE
Dominic Stone, PE
Transportation
Management Plan
Alejandro Tapia, PE
DSDD
Steven Alvarez, PE
Value Analysis
Eric Trimble, CVS, PMP 3
Structural Engineering
Pooya Haddadi, PE, SE
Jessica Mosquera, PE
ROW Data Sheets
BJ Swanner 4
Kim Bibolet, SR/WA,
RW-NAC 4
Geotechnical Engineering
Simon Saiid, PE, GE 2
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Alyssa Rivas
Utilities
BJ Swanner 4
Jeff Hamen 5
Constructability Review
Randy Ratzlaff, PE
Survey/ROW Mapping
John Duquette, PLS
Darlene Antiporda, PLS

ENGINEERING MANAGER
Hector Salcedo, PE
Key Personnel
Resume included
Michael Baker is pleased to present a team of highly qualified professionals to provide the City of Moreno Valley with the necessary engineering, surveying, and environmental services for the SR-60 / Redlands Boulevard Interchange Project. Our comprehensive Team has significant experience providing similar services, and we are committed to helping the City succeed the goals of this project. We understand the local laws, ordinances, regulations, policies, and requirements as requested in the RFP.

Michael Baker acknowledges and understands that the we will not be allowed to change any sub-consultants without written permission from the City. Michael Baker will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Detailed resumes for Key Personnel have been included with this proposal (Appendix II), whom will remain in service until the completion of the contract.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 26

PROPOSED TEAM AND KEY PERSONNEL

KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND EXPERIENCE OF KEY PERSONNEL
Michael Baker has been involved in planning and designing for California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) facilities / projects for over four decades. Our firm’s experience includes the study and development of over 150 freeway interchanges and 300-lane miles of state highway improvements. Within the Inland Empire, Michael Baker has played a significant role in the development of the expansive transportation network resulting in well-established Caltrans District 8 relationships.

Our Team recognizes that one key to successfully delivering this project will be team experience and consistency. Michael Baker has assigned Les Hopper, PE as Principal Project Manager, Jerusalem Verano, PE as Deputy Project Manager, Hector Salcedo, PE as Engineering Manager, and Alan Ashimine as Environmental Manager to form the core management and engineering / environmental team. Each of these individuals have worked on or are currently working on projects for the City and on SR-60 and have demonstrated a proven track record for PA/ED completion / approvals. This redundancy will give the City and Caltrans access to resources and teams they are familiar with and will approve the quality and accuracy of the project deliverables. ▬ Key project personnel and their experiences are highlighted below (detailed resumes and licenses included in Appendix II). ▬ If one or more of the Michael Baker’s staff should become unavailable, Michael Baker may substitute other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City.

Les Hopper, PE ▪ Principal Project Manager ▪ 43 Years of Experience. Availability: 40%. Mr. Hopper is currently serving as the Principal Project Manager for the SR-60/WLC Pkwy PS&E phase of the work. He is a prior Caltrans employee and has worked on over thirty PA/ED interchange and highway projects, along with many varied PS&E projects. He has functioned as the contract manager for over $100M in Task Orders. In addition, Les has a very strong background in the land development engineering and entitlement process and has been a principal company owner twice. As such, he is uniquely suited to perform as the Principal PM on the Redlands interchange due to his ability to communicate clearly with all parties- Caltrans, the City, and local developers. This capability will help Les move the project forward quickly! Lastly, through various board roles he has direct lines of communication with regional and state agency decision makers.

Relevant Experience:
▬ SR-60/WLC Parkway Interchange (PS&E) ▪ City of Moreno Valley ▪ Principal Project Manager. ▬ West Mission Bay Drive Bridge Replacement ▪ City of San Diego ▪ Project Manager. ▬ Caltrans Districts 2 and 3 Broadband On-Call Contracts #03A3533 and 03A345 ▪ Caltrans ▪ Contract Manager.

SUMMARY OF KEY PERSONNEL
Jerusalem Verano, PE ▪ Deputy Project Manager ▪ 12 Years of Experience. Availability: 50%. Mr. Verano served as the Deputy Project Manager / Project Engineer for the SR-60/WLC Pkwy PA/ED and is currently working on the PS&E phase of the work. He completed the I-10/Monroe PA/ED and is also working on other corridor improvements for the City on WLC Pkwy. He has a thorough understanding of the Caltrans oversight process, including the unique environmental and engineering technical studies required for a PA/ED approval. His hands-on communication and even tempered approach with strong District 8 and City staff relationships will help him to successfully navigate the Caltrans PA/ED process.

Relevant Experience:
▬ SR-60/WLC Parkway Interchange (PA/ED, PS&E) ▪ City of Moreno Valley ▪ Deputy Project Manager / Project Engineer. ▬ I-10 Monroe Street Engineering and Planning Services PA/ED ▪ Riverside County ▪ Deputy Project Manager / Project Engineer. ▬ I-605/SR-91 Interchange and I-605/I-5 Interchange PA/ED ▪ Los Angeles County Metro Transportation Authority ▪ Project Engineer.

Hector Salcedo, PE ▪ Engineering Manager ▪ 11 Years of Experience. Availability: 60%. Mr. Salcedo served as Roadway Lead for the SR-60/Redlands Boulevard PSR-PDS Project, and has experience working on all three phases of Caltrans project delivery which include the PID, PA/ED, and PS&E. His experience includes review and preparation of technical reports and preliminary geometric designs in the planning and development of major interchanges. His recent project experience includes design on the I-10 Design-Build Project and preparation of over 100 roadway plans complying to the Caltrans HDM, Standard Plans and Plan Preparation Manual.

Relevant Experience:
▬ SR-60/Redlands Boulevard PSR-PDS ▪ City of Moreno Valley ▪ Civil Engineer. ▬ I-10/Monroe Street and I-10/Jackson Street Interchanges PSR-PDS ▪ City of Indio ▪ Civil Engineer. ▬ I-10 Monroe Street Engineering and Planning Services ▪ Riverside County ▪ Civil Engineer.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 27

PROPOSED TEAM AND KEY PERSONNEL
Alan Ashimine ▪ Environmental Manager ▪ 24 Years of Experience. Availability: 60%. Mr. Ashimine has extensive experience in the research, analysis, and writing of environmental documentation for a variety of projects involving infrastructure, redevelopment, residential, and industrial uses. Using his broad background and understanding of environmental constraints, Alan provides defensible CEQA/NEPA compliance review and environmental documentation. His expertise is related to processing environmental documentation for transportation projects.

Relevant Experience:
▬ I-10/Monroe Street and I-10/Jackson Street Interchanges PSR-PDS ▪ City of Indio ▪ Environmental Specialist. ▬ SR-86/Avenue 50 Interchange ▪ City of Coachella ▪ Project Manager. ▬ I-10/Robertson/National Interchange Improvement Project ▪ City of Los Angeles ▪ Environmental Specialist.

Pooya Haddadi, PE, SE ▪ Lead Structural Engineer ▪ 19 Years of Experience. Availability: 40%. Mr. Haddadi currently serves as the Bridge Design Manager for the WLC Interchange—adjacent to the Redlands Interchange. Mr.

Haddadi has incorporated important design features like staged construction and improved vertical clearance, which are directly relevant for the Redlands Interchange. His experience encompasses production of Advance Planning Studies for PA/ED phase of transportation projects as well as successful delivery of the PS&E phase.

Relevant Experience:
▬ SR-60/WLC Parkway Interchange (PS&E) ▪ City of Moreno Valley ▪ Bridge Design Manager. ▬ Indian Street Bridge over Perris Valley Channel Lateral A ▪ City of Moreno Valley ▪ Project Manager. ▬ Studebaker Road at SR-22 Westbound On/Off Ramp Improvements ▪ City of Long Beach ▪ Structural Design Manager Bradley Losey, PE ▪ Drainage Manager ▪ 23 Years of Experience. Availability: 50%. Mr. Losey has spent his career on challenging highway drainage design projects, from design support roles through project management, to leading large teams such as his most recent role as Drainage Lead on a major Design Build project. Mr. Losey’s Caltrans drainage experience has given him a thorough understanding of Caltrans delivery processes, and the ability to deftly navigate an efficient path from PA/ED phase through PS&E. His experience includes H&H studies, computer modeling, project reports, storm drain design, and preparation of plans and specifications.

Relevant Experience:
▬ I-10/Monroe Street and I-10/Jackson Street Interchanges PSR-PDS ▪ City of Indio ▪ Drainage Manager. ▬ Interstate 10/Jefferson Street Interchange Improvements ▪ Riverside County ▪ Drainage Manager. ▬ I-10/Avenue 50 Interchange and Avenue 50 Extension ▪ City of Coachella ▪ Drainage Manager.

Daniel (Danny) Walden, PE ▪ QA/QC - Engineering ▪ 19 Years of Experience. Availability: 25%. Mr. Walden brings a wealth of experience and expertise in transportation roadway design and infrastructure improvement. With a strong background in working with Caltrans and municipalities, Danny has extensive knowledge of Caltrans design standards and a deep understanding of working with multiple agencies simultaneously. His experience includes the design and preparation of preliminary engineering study documents, as well as final design construction documents.

Relevant Experience:
▬ I-10 and Cherry Boulevard Interchange Project ▪ Riverside County ▪ Project Manager. ▬ I-10/Monroe Street and I-10/Jackson Street Interchanges PSR-PDS ▪ City of Indio ▪ Roadway Design Lead. ▬ I-10/Avenue 50 Interchange and Avenue 50 Extension ▪ City of Coachella ▪ Project Engineer.

Jason Pack, TE ▪ Transportation/VMT ▪ 25 Years of Experience. Availability: 30%. Mr. Pack has an extensive background in travel demand forecasting, traffic operations assessment (including micro-simulation assessment), VMT analysis, big data analysis, transit ridership forecasting, and transportation impact studies involving NEPA and CEQA. His recent work has included forecasting and operations assessment for large infrastructure improvements, developing recommendations for SB 743 implementation, assisting agencies with establishing VMT banks/exchanges, and emergency evacuation assessment to respond to new legislative requirements (SB 99 and AB 747).

Relevant Experience:
▬ SR-60 / Redlands Interchange ▪ City of Moreno Valley ▪ Project Manager/VMT Analysis. ▬ I-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange ▪ Riverside County ▪ Project Manager/VMT Analysis. ▬ I-10 Monroe Street Engineering and Planning Services ▪ Riverside County ▪ Project Manager/VMT Analysis.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 28

PROPOSED TEAM AND KEY PERSONNEL
Paul Herrman, TE ▪ Transportation/VMT ▪ 13 Years of Experience. Availability: 60%. Mr. Herrmann has led a wide variety of projects including traffic studies, infrastructure projects, travel demand forecasting, parking and circulation studies, and long-range development plans. Mr. Herrmann is an expert in SB 743 Implementation and VMT Analysis for CEQA projects. Mr. Herrmann is also an active member in the Fehr & Peers SB 743, Evacuation Planning and Safety Working Groups which hold weekly discussions on evolving industry best practices.

Relevant Experience:
▬ I-15 & SR-74 Interchange Improvement PAED ▪ City of Lake Elsinore ▪ Project Manager/VMT Analysis. ▬ I-15 & McCall Interchange Improvement PAED ▪ City of Menifee ▪ Project Manager/VMT Analysis. ▬ I-10 Cherry Valley Boulevard Interchange ▪ Riverside County ▪ QA/QC Engineer.

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES AND EXPERIENCE
Michael Baker has been extensively involved with Caltrans District 8 and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for the development and approval of multiple Project Study Report-Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) reports, Project Approval/ Environmental Documents (PA/ED), and Plans, Specifications & Estimates (PS&E) and has a thorough understanding of the Caltrans District 8 development process.

Recent projects that Michael Baker completed or in the process of completing within Riverside County and the Inland Empire include: the SR-60 / WLC Pkwy (Theodore Street) Interchange PA/ED (completed) & PS&E (in progress) for the City of Moreno Valley, the I-10 / Monroe & Jackson PA/ED (completed) and PS&E (near completion) for the City of Indio and RCTD, the I-10/ Jefferson Street Interchange PS&E (completed) for the City of Indio, and the I-10 Cherry Boulevard PA/ED (completed) for Riverside County. These projects are included within the relevant project sections with more information.

Michael Baker also prepared the SR-60/Redland Blvd. Interchange PSR-PDS granting our Team an in-depth understanding of the project challenges, local concerns, and the ability to deliver an efficient, high-quality PA/ED document through the Caltrans oversight process.

Michael Baker has the Local Depth, Breadth, and Experience to Support the City of Moreno Valley! SR-60/WLC Parkway Interchange PA/ED, City of Moreno Valley I-10/Jefferson Street Interchange PS&E, City of Indio I.19.b
Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 29

R E Q U I R E D S T A T E M E N T S
A. RFP 2024-016 has been incorporated in its entirety as a part of Michael Baker’s Proposal.

B. RFP 2024-016 and Michael Baker’s Proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for this project when said Agreement is fully executed by the Michael Baker and the City of Moreno Valley.

C. Michael Baker’s services to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City’s RFP except as otherwise specified on Page 30 of this proposal under the heading “ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY’S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL”.

D. A single and separate section with the heading “ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY’S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL” (if needed) containing a complete and detailed description of all of the exceptions to the provisions and conditions of this RFP upon which Michael Baker’s Proposal is contingent and which shall take precedent over this RFP (See Page 30).

E. A statement of qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of Michael Baker’s staff and subconsultants to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact. The Consultant shall list the available staff for such substitution in the Proposal.

F. A resource allocation matrix is included with the proposal. The resource allocation matrix lists detailed tasks in rows and the appropriate individual as well as the number of hours that these individuals will be working on each task listed, will be included in adjacent columns. The resource allocation matrix and the project design schedule for the Team. Contained herein.

G. Sub-consultant’s (include relief personnel) qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the sub-consultant’s staff to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact.

H. Michael Baker acknowledges and understands that the we will not be allowed to change any sub-consultants without written permission from the City.

I. All charges for Michael Baker services is a “Not-to-Exceed” Fee which includes conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made a part of this Proposal.

J. Michael Baker will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This may include preparation of office/field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement objectives.

K. To the extent possible, Michael Baker will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the construction work. Please note that Michael Baker is a Design-Only firm and is typically not in the field during contstruction or after, so those situations would not apply.

L. A copy of the Consultant’s hourly rate schedule and a statement that said hourly rate schedule is prior approved) incurred that is not part of this RFP. An itemized cost breakdown for the work described herein must be submitted in a separate file, entitled “Cost Proposal”, as part of the Consultant’s Proposal submittal. All extra work will require prior approval from the City.

M. Michael Baker will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

N. Michael Baker understands that all federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to notwithstanding any state or local laws and regulations. In a case of conflict between federal, state or local laws or regulations the strictest shall be adhered to.

O. Michael Baker shall allow all authorized federal, state, county, and City officials access to place of work, books, documents, papers, fiscal, pay roll, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this special project. All relevant records shall be retained for at least three (3) years.

P. Michael Baker will comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC 276-a through a-7), and the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto (29 CFR Section 1, 5), any amendments thereof and the California Labor Code. Pursuant to the said regulations, entitled “Federal Labor Standards Provisions,” Federal Prevailing Wage Decision” and State of California prevailing wage rates, respectively.

Q. Michael Baker will comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 USC 874) and the Implementation Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any amendments thereof.

R. The Consultant offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Consultant, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

A summary of the required statements (also shown throughout our proposal document) have been summarized below.

Per Section 4.4 of RFP 2024-016. All statements below are understood and contained herein.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS ▬ PAGE 30 ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY’S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Michael Baker has included exceptions to the RFP below to items under RFP Section 9 “Special Terms and Conditions”, which we would like the opportunity to discuss with the City of Moreno Valley (City).

Item 9.1 - Termination
Termination for cost is a serious penalty and as such, Michael Baker should be notified and provided opportunity to cure any claimed default. In addition, performance criteria should be objective andn tied to the standard of care. Michael Baker would like the opportunity to discuss this with the City and provide input on changes to these clauses in the contract.

Item 9.4 - Indemnification
Michael Baker has several comments within the Indemnification portion of the sample contract, including the fact that Michael Baker can no indemnify the City for its own negligence. We would like the opportunity to discuss this change, as well as other clauses with the City.

There are other minor changes throughout the sample contract language that we would like the opportunity to discuss with the City. Please note that Michael Baker has recently executed a contract with the City so we are confident that we can successfully work through any issues.

I.19.b
Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT APPENDIX I: REQUIRED FORMS
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS

REQUIRED FORMS

NONCOLLUSION DECLARATION
(To be executed by Bidder and Submitted with Bid)
The undersigned declares:

I am the Vice President, Western Region Practice/ Market Lead - Transportation of Michael Baker International, Inc., the party making the foregoing bid.

The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on May 9, 2024 [date], at Carlsbad [city], California [state].

By: _______________________________________
(signature)
Printed Name: ________________________________
Title: ________________________________________
Les Hopper, PE
Vice President, Western Region Practice /
Market Lead - Transportation
ATTACHMENT G: NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
I.19.b
Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Consultant Agreement [Revision 2] (6628 : AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ▬ STATE ROUTE 60 / REDLANDS BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS

REQUIRED FORMS
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
EXHIBIT 10-Q DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10) (last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one-time fee

13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in-kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred
Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________

15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Signature: ________________________________________
Print Name: _______________________________________
Title: ____________________________________________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date:___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files