CONSULTANT_AGREEMENT.pdf — Moreno Valley City Council, August 20, 2024

1 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR

HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

This Agreement (hereinafter, this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this __ _____ day of _____________ 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Moreno Valley, a municipal corporation in the County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” and Ma rk Thomas & Company, Inc. , a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Consultant.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City has determined it is in the public interest to proceed with the professional work hereinafter described as "Project"; and WHEREAS, the City has determined the Project involves the performance of professional and technical services of a temporary nature as more specifically described in Exhibit "A" (City's Request for Proposal) and Exhibit "B" (Consultant's Proposal) hereto; and WHEREAS, the City does not have available employees to perform the services for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City has requested the Consultant to perform such services for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Consultant is professionally qualified in California to perform the professional and technical services required for the Project, and hereby represents that it desires to and is professionally and legally capable of performing the services called for by this Agreement;
THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant, for the consideration hereinafter described, mutually agree as follows:

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

2 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

1. The Project is described as HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION . Project No. 801 0010.

SCOPE OF SERVICES

2. The Consultant's scope of service is described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict, the City's Request for Proposal shall take precedence over the Consultant's Proposal.

3. The City's responsibility is described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

PAYMENT TERMS

4. The City agrees to pay the Consultant and the Consultant agrees to receive a "Not- to-Exceed" fee of $ 894,547.00 in accordance with the payment terms provided on Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

TIME FOR PERFORMANCE

5. The Consultant shall commence services upon receipt of written direction to proceed from the City.

6. The Consultant shall perform the work described on Exhibit "A" in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

7. This Agreement shall be effective from effective date and shall continue in full force and effect date through December 31, 2026 , subject to any earlier termination in accordance with this Agreement. The services of Consultant shall be completed in a sequence assuring expeditious completion, but in any event, all such services shall be completed prior to expiration of this Agreement.

8. (a) The Consultant agrees that the personnel, including the principal Project

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

3 Manager, and all subconsultants assigned to the Project by the Consultant, shall be subject to the prior approval of the City.
(b) No change in subconsultants or key personnel shall be made by the Consultant without written prior approval of the City.

SPECIAL PROVISIONS

9. It is understood and agreed that the Consultant is, and at all times shall be, an independent consultant and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the Consultant or any individual whose compensation for services is paid by the Consultant, an agent or employee of the City, or authorizing the Consultant to create or assume any obligation or liability for or on behalf of the City.

10. The Consultant may also retain or subcontract for the services of other necessary consultants with the prior written approval of the City. Payment for such services shall be the responsibility of the Consultant. Any and all subconsultants employed by t he Consultant shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, except that the City shall have no obligation to pay any subconsultant for services rendered on the Project.

11. The Consultant and the City agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective services under this Agreement.

12. The Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws in the performance of work under this Agreement.

13. To the extent required by controlling federal, state and local law, Consultant shall not employ discriminatory practices in the provision of services, employment of personnel, or in any other respect on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Subject to the foregoing

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

4 and during the performance of this Agreement, Consultant agrees as follows:
(a) Consultant will comply with all applicable laws and regulations providing that no person shall, on the grounds of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual ori entation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity made possible by or resulting from this Agreement. (b) Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Consultant shall ensure that applicants are employed, and the employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ances try, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Such requirement shall apply to Consultant’s employment practices including, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this nondiscrimination clause.
(c) Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees plac ed by or on behalf of Consultant in pursuit hereof, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

5 orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. (d) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall cause each subconsultant to also comply with the requirements of this Section 13.

14. Indemnification.

a. Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 2782.8, in performing “design professional services” as defined in Section 2782.8, the Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housi ng Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent, reckless, or willful misconduct in the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant under this RFP and/or related Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees; and does not apply to any passive negligence of City unless caused at least in part by Consultant.
b. Non-Design Professional Services. For all non-design professional services, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

6 person, including injury to the Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant, or are caused or claim to be caused by the acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.
c. If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each subconsultant to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

d. CalPERS Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, in addition to obligations set forth in this section, in the event that any person providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligib le for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of the City, to the fullest extent of the law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any costs and expenses incurred by City, including without limitation, payment that City is required as a result to make to CalPERS, whether in the form of employee and/or employer contributions, taxes, or any similar obligations, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest.

15. CalPERS Participation . As set forth in this Agreement and in the Request for Qualifications, City has an obligation to treat all persons working for or under the direction of Consultant as an independent Consultant of City and agents and employees of Consultant, and not as agents or employees of City. Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that City participates in a defined benefit plan (“CalPERS”), and that it is possible that CalPERS may find

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

7 that persons providing services pursuant to this Agreement are employees of City and should be registered with the CalPERS as employees of City.

16. CalPERS Retiree Disclosure . Consultant hereby expressly agrees to clearly and conspicuously disclose to City in writing any and all persons working for Consultant who are retirees under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) whom receives a monthly CalPERS retirement allowance, and whom are, subject to City approval, assigned by Consultant to provide services to City under the Agreement, prior to such person performing any services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted to limit a CalPERS retiree’s obligations under applicable law, rules or regulations.

Joint Cooperation. In the event that CalPERS initiates an inquiry that includes examination of whether individuals providing services under this Agreement to City are City’s employees, Consultant shall within five days and share all communications and documents from CalPERS that it may legally share. In the event that either Consultant or City files an appeal or court challenge, Consultant and City each agree to cooperate with each other in responding to the inquiry and any subsequent administrative appeal or court challenge of an adverse determination.

This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

17. Insurance.
(a) Throughout the life of this Agreement, Consultant shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all insurance as required in Exhibit E or as may be authorized in writing by the City Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion. (b) If at any time during the life of the Agreement or any extension, Consultant or any of its subconsultant fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all services and work under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

8 due or that become due to Consultant shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to C ity. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Agreement. No action taken by City pursuant to this section shall in any way relieve Consultant of its responsibilities under this Agreement.

The phrase “fail to maintain any required insurance” shall include, without limitation, notification received by C ity that an insurer has commenced proceedings, or has had proceedings commenced against it, indicating that the insurer is insolvent. (c) The fact that insurance is obtained by Consultant shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Consultant , including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Consultant . Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Consultant, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Consultant, vendors, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub- consultants, subconsultants or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.
(d) Upon request of C ity, Consultant shall immediately furnish C ity with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Agreement, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement. (e) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each subconsultant to provide insurance protection in favor of C ity and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

9 volunteers in accordance with the terms of this section, except that any required certificates and applicable endorsements shall be on file with Consultant and City prior to the commencement of any services by the subconsultant.

18. The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement. No provisions of this Agreement may be waived unless in writing and signed by all parties to this Agreement. Waiver of any one provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision herein.

19. Consultant and subconsultants shall pay prevailing wage rates when required by the Labor Laws of the State of California. Consultant and all of Consultant’s subcontractors, if any, shall pay each employee engaged in all applicable trades or occupation not less than the prevailing hourly wage rate for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 of the California Labor Code (“Labor Code”), the Director of Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rates of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, and subsistence pay as provided for in Labor Code Section 1773.8, apprenticeship or other training programs authorized by Labor Code Section 3093 and similar purposes applicable to the work to be done. Said wages are available through the California Department of Industrial Relations’ Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/PWD/index.htm
and are on file at City Hall, as provided in Section
1773.2 of the Labor Code. Said rates shall be posted at the Project site where work is to be performed, in accordance with Labor Code Section 1773.2. Consultant shall access a copy of the wage rate determination and shall make all subcontractors, if any, aware of the

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

10 determination. As the wage determination for each craft reflects an expiration date, it shall be the Consultant’s responsibility to ensure that the prevailing wage rates of concern are current and paid. Subject to the safe harbor provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, Consultant shall forfeit to the City an amount not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200) for each calendar day or portion thereof, as set by the Labor Commissioner in accordance with the terms of Labor Code section 1775, for each laborer, wor kmen or mechanics employed that is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages herein referred to and stipulated for any work done under the proposed contract, by him, or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Labor Code, and in particular, Sections 1770 to 1781 inclusive. Consultant and any and all or its subcontractors shall forfeit to the City twenty -five dollars ($25) for each worker employed in the performance of this Agreement for each calendar day during which the worker is required or permitted to work more than eight (8) hours in any one calendar day and forty (40) hours in any one calendar week in violation of the provisions of Section 1813 of the Labor Code. In the event the total cost of the Project is thirty thousand dollars ($30,000.00) or more, Consultant shall further comply with provisions set forth in Labor Code Section 1777.5 pertaining to employment of properly registered apprentices, including without limitation the obligation to (i) pay employed apprentices the prevailing rate of per diem wages for apprentices in the trade to which he or she is registered and shall be employed only at the work of craft or trade to which he or she is registered; (ii) employ apprentices in at least the ratio as set f orth in said section; (iii) submit contract award information to an applicable apprenticeship program; and (iv) contribute to California Apprenticeship Council.

Consultant and all subcontractors hired to perform any work under the Project shall keep accurate payroll records, including the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

11 diem wages paid to each worker, in accordance with Section 1776 of the Labor Code. Payroll records shall be on forms provided by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”) or in a manner containing the same information as the forms provided by t he DLSE. Failure to comply with the above may result in monetary penalties to the Consultant or affected subcontractor. Payroll records shall be verified by written declaration made under penalty of perjury, that the information contained in the records is true and correct. Consultant and any and all subcontractors shall make a certified copy of all payroll records available for inspection by DLSE, the City or any member of the public and otherwise provide certified copies of such records to any of the foregoing within ten (10) days of Consultant ’s and subcontractor’s receipt of written request therefor. Failure to comply with the above may result in monetary penalties, in accordance with Labor Code Section 1776(d) and (h).

Notwithstanding anything else to the contrary, Cons ultant hereby acknowledges that all contractors and subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“Department”) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 in order to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any public work contract, including this Agreement, that is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. Th e Project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. In accordance with Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Consultant must secure payment of compensation to all Consultant ’s employees.

Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant is registered with the Department in the manner prescribed by the Department and has paid the requisite application fee, as required by Labor Code Section 1725.5. Moreover, prior to Consultant entering into any contracts with any subcontractor, Consultant shall obtain proof that all such subcontractors have also registered with the Department in accordance with Section 1725.5.

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

12 20. (a) The Consultant shall deliver to the Public Works Director/City Engineer of the City or his designated representative, fully completed and detailed project-related documents which shall become the property of the City. The Consultant may retain, for its files, copies of any and all material, including drawings, documents, and specifications, produced by the Consultant in performance of this Agreement.
(b) The Consultant shall be entitled to copies of all furnished materials for his files and his subconsultants, if any.
(c) The City agrees to hold the Consultant free and harmless from any claim arising from any unauthorized use of computations, maps, and other documents prepared or provided by the Consultant under this Agreement, if used by the City on other work without the permission of the Consultant. Consultant acknowledges that Consultant work product produced under this agreement may be public record under State law.

21. (a) This Agreement shall terminate without any liability of C ity to Consultant upon the earlier of: (i) Consultant’s filing for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or any bankruptcy petition or petition for receiver commenced by a third party against C onsultant; (ii) 10 calendar days prior written notice with or without cause by City to Consultant; (iii) City’s non- appropriation of funds sufficient to meet its obligations hereunder during any C ity fiscal year of this Agreement, or insufficient funding for the Project; or (iv) expiration of this Agreement. The written notice shall specify the date of termination. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant may continue services on the project through the date of termination, provided that no service(s) shall be commenced or continued after receipt of the notice, which is not intended to protect the interest of t he City. The City shall pay the Consultant within thirty (30) days after the date of termination for all non-objected to services performed by the Consultant in accordance herewith

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

13 through the date of termination. Consultant shall not be paid for any work or services performed or costs incurred which reasonably could have been avoided. (b) In the event of termination due to failure of C onsultant to satisfactorily perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, City may withhold an amount that would otherwise be payable as an offset to, but not in excess of, C ity’s damages caused by such failure. In no event shall any payment by C ity pursuant to this Agreement constitute a waiver by C ity of any breach of this Agreement which may then exist on the part of Consultant, nor shall such payment impair or prejudice any remedy available to City with respect to the breach. (c) Upon any breach of this Agreement by Consultant, City may (i) exercise any right, remedy (in contract, law or equity), or privilege which may be available to it under applicable laws of the State of California or any other applicable law; (ii) proceed by appropriate court action to enforce the terms of the A greement; and/or (iii) recover all direct, indirect, consequential, economic and incidental damages for the breach of the Agreement. If it is determined that City improperly terminated this Agreement for default, such termination shall be deemed a termination for convenience
.
(d) Consultant shall be liable for default unless nonperformance is caused by an occurrence beyond the reasonable control of Consultant and without its fault or negligence such as, acts of God or the public enemy, acts of C ity in its contractual capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, unusually severe weather, and delays of common carriers. C onsultant shall notify City in writing as soon as it is reasonably possible after the commencement of any excusable delay, setting forth the full particulars in connection therewith, and shall remedy such occurrence with all reasonable dispatch, and shall promptly give written notice to Administrator of the cessation of such occurrence.

22. This Agreement is binding upon the City and the Consultant and their successors

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

14 and assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, sublet, or transfer its interest in this Agreement or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the other.

23. A City representative shall be designated by the City and a Consultant representative shall be designated by the Consultant. The City representative and the Consultant representative shall be the primary contact person for each party regarding performance of this Agreement. The City representative shall cooperate with the Consultant, and the Consultant's representative shall cooperate with the City in all matters regarding this Agreement and in such a manner as will result in the performance of the services in a timely and expeditious fashion.

24. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and the Consultant, and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or Agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a subseque nt written Agreement signed by both parties.

25. Where the payment terms provide for compensation on a time and materials basis, the Consultant shall maintain adequate records to permit inspection and audit of the Consultant's time and materials charges under this Agreement. The Consultant shall make such records available to the City at the Consultant's office during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. Nothing herein shall convert such records into public records. Except as may be otherwise required by law, such records will be available only to the City. Such records shall be maintained by the Consultant for three (3) years following completion of the services under this Agreement.

26. The City and the Consultant agree, that to the extent permitted by law, until final approval by the City, all data shall be treated as confidential and will not be released to third

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

15 parties without the prior written consent of both parties.

27. (a) Consultant shall comply, and require its sub consultants to comply, with all applicable (i) professional canons and requirements governing avoidance of impermissible client conflicts; and (ii) federal, state and local conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, California Government Code Section 1090 et. seq., the California Political Reform Act (California Government Code Section 87100 et. seq.) and the regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission concerning disclosure and disqualification (2 California Code of Regulations Section 18700 et. seq.). At any time, upon written request of City, Consultant shall provide a written opinion of its legal counsel and that of any sub consultant that, after a due diligent inquiry, Consultant and the respective sub consultant(s) are in full compliance with all laws and regulations. Consultant shall take, and require its subconsultants to take, reasonable steps to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest. Upon discovery of any facts giving rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest, Consultant shall immediately notify City of these facts in writing.
(b) In performing the work or services to be provided hereunder, Consultant shall not employ or retain the services of any person while such person either is employed by City or is a member of any C ity council, commission, board, committee, or similar C ity body.

This requirement may be waived in writing by the City Manager, if no actual or potential conflict is involved.
(c) Consultant represents and warrants that it has not paid or agreed to pay any compensation, contingent or otherwise, direct or indirect, to solicit or procure this Agreement or any rights/benefits hereunder.
(d) Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s subconsultants performing any services on this Project, shall bid for, assist anyone in the preparation of a bid for, or perform

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

16 any services pursuant to, any other contract in connection with this Project unless fully disclosed to and approved by the City Manager, in advance and in writing. Consultant and any of its subconsultants shall have no interest, direct or indirect, in any other contract with a third party in connection with this Project unless such interest is in accordance with all applicable law and fully disclosed to and approved by the City Manager, in advance and in writing. Notwithstanding any approval given by the City Manager under this provision, Consultant shall remain responsible for complying with Section 25(a), above.
(e) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed or services to be provided under this Agreement, Consultant shall include the provisions of this Section 25 in each subcontract and require its subconsultants to comply therewith.
(f) This Section 25 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.

28. All Plans, drawings, Specifications, reports, logs, and other documents prepared by the Consultant in its performance under this Agreement shall, upon completion of the project, be delivered to and be the property of the City, provided that the Consultant shall be entitled, at its own expense, to make copies thereof for its own use.

29. The laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement, and shall also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Venue shall be vested in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside.

30. Consultant expressly waives any and all rights and benefits conferred upon it by the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which reads as follows:
“A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
PROJECT NO. 801 0010

17 executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.” _____
Initials
This waiver shall be effective as a bar to any and all actions, fees, damages, losses, claims, liabilities and demands of whatsoever character, nature and kind that are known or unknown, or suspected or unsuspected, including, without limitation, claims of entitlements under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) that are only afforded to employees and not independent contractors. Consultant further represents and warrants that it understands this waiver and that if it does not understand this waiver, it shall seek the advice of a qualified attorney before executing this Agreement.

31. The Consultant shall comply with the supplementary Federal provisions described on Exhibit F (Supplemental General Conditions) and Exhibit G (Caltrans Supplementary Conditions) attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties have each caused their authorized representative to execute this Agreement.

City of Moreno Valley Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

BY: BY:

Mike Lee, City Manager
Name:

Date TITLE:
(President or Vice President)

D ate

BY:

Name:

TITLE:
(Corporate Secretary)

Date

Enclosures: Exhibit “A” – City Scope of Services
Exhibit “B” – Consultant Proposal
Exhibit “C” – City Services
Exhibit “D” – Terms of Payment
Exhibit “E” – Insurance Requirements

INTERNAL USE ONLY

APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:

City Attorney

Date

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Public Works Director/City Engineer

Date
EXHIBIT “A”

CITY SCOPE OF SERVICES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
2024-008
HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 801
0010)
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
RELEASE DATE: April 25, 2024
DEADLINE FOR QUESTIONS: May 16, 2024
RESPONSE DEADLINE: May 27, 2024, 2:00 pm
RESPONSES MUST BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY TO:
https://secure.procurenow.com/portal/morenovalley
Exhibit "A"
City of Moreno Valley

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010)

1. NOTICE TO BIDDERS ................................ ................................ ...................

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................ ................................ ...............

3. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................ ................................ ...........

4. PROPOSAL CONTENT ................................ ................................ .................

5. PROSPECTIVE BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS ................................ .....................

6. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS ................................ ................................ .....

7. EVALUATION AND RANKING OF PROPOSALS ................................ .............

8. AWARD ................................ ................................ ................................ ......

9. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS ................................ .............................

10. SCOPE OF SERVICES ................................ ................................ ...................

11. LABOR LAWS, PREVAILING WAGES ................................ ............................

12. Vendor Questionnaire................................ ................................ ................

Attachments:

A - Attachment A - Location Map Heacock Street
B - Attachment B - Heacock CIP Form
C - Attachment C - Non-Collusion Declaration
D - Attachment D - Sample Consultant Agreement for Project Specific Services 801 0010
E - Attachment E - Exhibit 10-O1 Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment F - Attachment F - Exhibit 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 3 1. NOTICE TO BIDDERS

1.1. Summary
The City of Moreno Valley desires to widen Heacock Street to the full street width per City Standards for Arterial Streets from San Michele Road to Harley Knox Drive Boulevard and provide other ultimate street improvements including but not limited to: the full pavement structural section, street lights, sidewalks, curb & gutter, ADA Ramps to current approved standards, storm drain culverts, traffic control devices (if required), pavement markings and striping. The CIP sheet showing the project location, limits, and budgeted amounts is included with this RFP. Preliminary eng ineering, conceptual design, and an alignment analysis, have been started (35%); however, the work to date must be reviewed and updated.

Qualified firms are hereby invited to submit a proposal for providing professional consultant design services including but not limited to survey; ROW investigation and acquisition; Environmental analysis, report, and clearance; utility coordination (location, relocation, and/or protect in place); coordination with affected agencies as required for the roadway design/align ment (RCFC&WCD, March Air Reserve Base/JPA, City of Perris, etc.); Plans, Specification, and Construction Cost Estimate (PS&E); street structural section design (including Geotech); street drainage analysis and design; street light design (if needed); coordination with other agencies including local Tribal consultations on behalf of the City; and provide bidding support and design services during project construction. The selected consultants could be retained to serve the City throughout the design, bidding, and construction process.

You are hereby invited to submit a proposal for providing professional consultant design services including but not limited to survey; ROW investigation and acquisition; Environmental analysis, report, and clearance; utility coordination (location, relocation, and/or protect in place); coordination with affected agencies as required for the roadway design/alignment (RCFC&WCD, March Air Reserve Base/JPA, City of Perris, etc.); Plans, Specification, and Construction Cost Estimate (PS&E); street structural section design (including Geotech); street drainage analysis and design; street light design (if needed); coordination with other agencies including local Tribal consultations on behalf of the City; and provide bidding support and design services during project construction. The selected consultants could be retained to serve the City throughout the design, bidding, and construction process. .

Each bidder is hereby informed that proposals and its contents are subject to disclosure in accordance with the California Public Records Act (California Government Code Sections 7920 et seq.).

1.2. Background
Moreno Valley was incorporated in 1984 as a General Law City, merging the communities of Moreno, Sunnymead, and Edgemont. The City operates under a Council -Manager form of government. The City Council is comprised o f an elected Mayor and four Council Members elected by district. The City has a committed customer-service oriented workforce comprised of more than 450 employees who provide a wide-range of municipal services including Public Works, Economic Development, Community Development, Parks and Community Services, Financial and Management Services and Library services. The City contracts with Riverside County for Police and Fire services.

1.3. Timeline
Due Dates and RFP-Contract Award Schedule
The Request for Proposal (RFP) release, proposal review and consultant selection processes that leads to the award of a contract for the requested services are anticipated to be completed per the following schedule:

RFP Release Date April 25, 2024
Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 4 Questions & Answer Deadline May 16, 2024, 2:00pm
Proposal Due Date May 27, 2024, 2:00pm

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 5 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1. Project Description
The project in general consists of the improvement of about 4,600 linear feet of Heacock Street to a total of five lanes (4 lanes with a center lane) from San Michele Road to Harley Knox Boulevard. Heacock Street has been designated as a four (4) lane arterial roadway having a typical width of 76’ curb to curb and 100’ right-of-way (per City Standard 104A) that varies to accommodate various intersection improvements and right of way constraints. Elements of the project are as follows:
• Properties west of Heacock Street are primarily controlled by the March Air Reserve Base and March Joint Powers Authority. Warehouse development is currently occurring on the east side of Heacock Street between San Michele Road and Nandina Avenue within the City of Moreno Valley.
• Heacock Street south of Nandina Avenue was closed to through traffic in 2006 by the Moreno Valley City Council.
• Heacock Street south of Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral “B” is located within the City of Perris.

No pavement currently exists. Proposed improvements on this portion of the roadway shall be coordinated with the City of Perris and conform to City of Perris requirements. • The alignment of Heacock Street between Nandina Avenue and the Perris Valley Storm Drain Lateral “B” is proposed to be realigned across March Air Reserve Base property. • A traffic study was conducted for this segment of Heacock Street by the City of Moreno Valley that included a preliminary proposed alignment.
• The intersection of Heacock Street at Harley Knox Boulevard was improved by the City of Perris with a modern roundabout. Coordination with the City of Perris will be required to connect Heacock Street to the existing roundabout.
• The intersection of Heacock Street at San Michele Road shall require a traffic signal modification.
• The bridge structure at the Perris Valley Strom Drain Lateral “B” is identified as Bridge Number 56C0538 per the Caltrans Local Agency Bridge List. The structure was constructed in 2005, has a curb-to-curb width of 26 feet, has a structure length of 30 feet, and is identified as a concrete culvert structure. Bridge widening/modification would be required. • This segment of Heacock Street is anticipated to be classified as a Truck Route. • An unimproved drainage ditch exists on the west side of Heacock Street south of San Michele Road.
• Proposed improvements to Heacock Street shall conform to the requirements of the March Air Reserve Base Clear Zone and Accident Potential Zone 1 as necessary.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 6 • Conduct local Tribal consultations (AB-52).

2.2. Project Budget and Schedule
The design of the Project is funded from Gas Tax and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program funding administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) for completing the design phase that includes environmental documentation and clearance (CEQA and NEPA), permitting (Local, State, and Federal as required), PS&E, and right of way engineering for the project. Currently there is no funding available to construct the project. It is the City’s intent to have the design, environment clearance, and right of way completed for the project and make it more advantageous in seeking for various State and Federal grants and funding sources to fund the construction; therefore, all work on this project, including the construction, shall be in compliance with Federal requirements to qualify for potential future grants.

The schedule will be part of the Consultants Proposal. This will be negotiated and included in the contract documents.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 7 3. GENERAL INFORMATION
Proposals must be submitted electronically via the City of Moreno Valley e -Procurement System, OpenGov, before the Due Date and Time as shown on Section 1.3 of this RFP, at:
https://procurement.opengov.com/portal/morenovalley

The proposer shall provide a separate file for technical proposal and a separate file for cost proposal. (Note: Cost proposals will not be opened during the review and rating of the technical proposals. Once the consultant ranking is made and top-ranked consultant is identified, only the cost proposal of the top- ranked consultant will be opened for review and contract negotiation purposes.) Unless otherwise specified, proposals submitted by any other method such as hard copy, fax, or e -mail will be disqualified.

Proposals may be withdrawn on the OpenGov vendor portal prior to the scheduled submittal time and date for receipt of proposals.

Prospective bidder's are encouraged to not wait until deadline to submit proposals, as system -related questions may arise.

All questions, technical, commercial, or contractual in nature shall be directed to the Questions & Answers Section on the e -Procurement System, OpenGov. No phone calls will be allowed. Contact of the City of Moreno Valley personnel directly regarding this RFP is prohibited and may be grounds for elimination from the selection process. All questions regarding this RFP must be submitted through OpenGov no later than the Questions & Answers Deadline as shown on Section 1.3 of this RFP.

Bidders experiencing any technical difficulties with the bid submission process may contact OpenGov at (650) 336 -7167 or utilize the chat bubble in the system. Neither the City, nor OpenGov, makes any guarantee as to the timely availability of assistance, or assurance that any given problem will be resolved by the bid submission deadline.

Right to Reject Proposals: City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any non-material irregularities or informalities in any proposal, and to accept or reject any item or combination of items.

Execution of Agreement: If a prospective bidder is not able to execute an agreement within 10 days after being notified of selection, City reserves the right to select the next most qualified bidder or call for new proposals, whichever City deems most appropriate. (Sample template of agreement is attached).

Incorporation of RFP/Proposal : This RFP and the firm’s response, including all promises, warranties, commitments, and representations made in the successful proposal will become binding contractual obligations and will be incorporated by reference in any agreement between City and prospective bidder.

Authorized Signatories: Company personnel signing the cover letter of the proposal, or any other related forms submitted must be authorized signers with the requisite authority to represent their firm and to enter into binding contracts.

Validity of Proposals: Proposed services and related pricing contained in the proposal must be valid for a period of 60 Days after the due date.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 8 4. PROPOSAL CONTENT
The Consultant’s Proposal shall be no more than 20 pages, excluding executive summary, resumes, dividers, and certificates. Proposals failing to provide sufficient information and assurances of performance to accurately assess each category of the required services and failing to comply with requirements and conditions of the RFP will not be given further consideration.

4.1. Executive Summary
The Consultant shall include an executive summary with general firm’s information including full legal name and contact information, organizational structure (corporation, LLC, etc.), name(s) and title(s) of the principal owner(s), person(s) authorized to make commitments for your company identified in the corporate resolution, firm history and length of relevant experience, and current number of employees with emphasis on key personnel. The executive summary shall be limited to a maximum of one page.

4.2. Technical Proposal
The Consultant shall include, but not be limited to, the following items in the body of the proposal:

A. Proposer’s approach and understanding of all necessary tasks and steps involved in completing the required services.

B. Responses with sufficient detail to enable City to evaluate your understanding of City’s requirements, the suitability of your services and/or product(s) to meet City’s requirements, the strength of your work plan, previous experience, and current workload.

C. A detailed work plan to reflect the methods and procedures that the proposer intends to use to provide the required services. The scope of services outlined in this RFP is only provided as a guide and does not include all the tasks as required to complete the work.

D. A list of deliverables.

E. Procedures for perform Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) on the services to be provided.

F. Related experience including relevant experience date, name of agency, and Reference name/contact information.

G. A resource allocation matrix (exclude cost information).

4.3. Proposed Staff/Team
A. Information on key personnel who are expected to remain in service until completion of the contract.

B. Information on the back-up personnel in the event of the key personnel not available to provide the contracted services for certain period during the contract duration.

C. Provide resumes of proposed staff/team members.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 9 4.4. Required Statements
The Consultant’s Proposal shall include the following:

A. A statement that this RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of the Consultant's Proposal.

B. A statement that this RFP and the Consultant's Proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for this project when said Agreement is fully executed by the Consultant and the Mayor or City Manager of Moreno Valley.

E. A statement of qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the Consultant’s Staff to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact. If one or more of the Consultant’s staff should become unavailable, the Consultant may substitute other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City.

F. A resource allocation matrix must be submitted with the Proposal. The resource allocation matrix must list detailed tasks in rows and the appropr iate individual (Job Title Only) as well as the number of hours that these individuals will be working on each task listed, will be included in adjacent columns. The resource allocation matrix and the project design schedule are required of both the prima ry consultant, as well as any sub -consultant. In addition, the applicable construction support services consultant must list the type and number or hours of geotechnical tests being proposed, as well as the type and number of hours of inspection or survey work within the Proposal. Failure to do so will result in the Consultant’s Proposal being deemed incomplete and it will not receive further consideration. The construction support services Consultant is not required to provide a Project Schedule with milestones.

G. A statement of sub-consultant’s (include relief personnel) qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the sub -consultant’s staff to be assigned to this project; a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact.

H. A statement that the Consultant acknowledges and understands that the Consultant will not be allowed to change the sub-consultant without written permission from the City.

I. A statement that all charges for Consultant (construction) services is a “Not-to-Exceed Fee” which must include conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made a part of said Consultant's Proposal.

J. A statement that the Consultant will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This may include preparation of field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement objectives.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 10 K. A statement that the Consultant will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the construction work.

L. A copy of the Consultant's hourly rate schedule and a statement that said hourly rate schedule is part of the Consultant's Proposal for use in invoicing for progress payments and for extra work incurred that is not part of this RFP. An itemized cost breakdown for the work described herein must be submitted in a separate file, entitled Cost file, as part of the Consultant’s Proposal submittal. All extra work will require prior approval from the City.

M. A statement that the Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

N. A statement that all federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to notwithstanding any state or local laws and regulations. In a case of conflict between federal, state or local laws or regulations the strictest shall be adhered to.

O. A statement that the Consultant shall allow all authorized federal, state, county, and City officials access to place of work, books, documents, papers, fiscal, payroll, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this special project. All relevant records shall be retained for at least three years.

P. A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Davis -Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC 276 -a through a -7), and the implementation regulations issued pursuant ther eto (29 CFR Section 1, 5), any amendments thereof and the California Labor Code. Pursuant to the said regulations, entitled “Federal Labor Standards Provisions,” Federal Prevailing Wage Decision” and State of California prevailing wage rates, respectively.

Q. A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Copeland Anti -Kickback Act (18 USC 874) and the Implementation Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any amendments thereof.

R. A statement that the Consultant offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Prof essions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Consultant, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

4.5. Required Forms
A. Attachment C - Non-Collusion Declaration
B. Attachment E - Exhibit 10-O1 - Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment C. Attachment F - Exhibit 10-Q - Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

4.6. Cost Proposal
The proposer shall provide a se parate file for technical proposal and a separate file for cost proposal.

A. Cost Proposal that includes all costs associated with the services proposed.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 11 B. A rate schedule aligned with titles in the resource allocation matrix in Technical Proposal.

C. The general Scope of Services outlined herein is only provided as a guide in this Request for Proposal.

D. Itemized tasks and corresponding costs must be identical to the detailed Scope of Services included as part of the Proposer’s Technical Proposal.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 12 5. PROSPECTIVE BIDDER QUALIFICATIONS

5.1. Prospective Bidder Qualifications
The intent of this RFP is to evaluate the proposals, determine the prospective bidder's that are in the competitive range, and select proposers that will provide the highest level of professional services for City.

5.2. Minimum Qualifications:

The proposed staff who will be providing Engineering Design Services shall have the knowledge of:

A. Theories, principles and practices of civil engineering design and construction.

B. Principles and modern techniques and commonly used materials and equipment used in design, construction, and maintenance of various public works projects.

C. Federal, state and local laws, regulations, and court decisions applicable to public works projects.

D. Information technology and computer capabilities to perform daily engineering tasks.

E. Principles and practices of sound business communication, teamwork, and work ethics.

The proposed staff shall also possess the ability to:

A. Prepare, direct preparation of and review complex engineering designs, plans, specifications, and legal contracts.

B. Perform difficult technical research and analyze complex engineering and mathematical problems, evaluating alternatives and recommending or adopting effective courses of action.

C. Plan, organize, manage, and integrate engineering design and construction activities.

D. Design issues, analyze problems, evaluate alternatives, and develop sound and independent judgements and recommendations.

E. Understand, interpret, explain, and apply federal, state, and local policy, law, regulations, and court decisions applicable to public works project implementation.

F. Operate a personal computer using standard or customized software applications appropriate to assigned tasks.

G. Supervise and evaluate the work of professional consultants and construction contractors.

H. Prepare clear, concise, and comprehensive correspondence, reports, and other written materials.

I. Organize, set priorities, and exercise sound independent judgement within areas of responsibility.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 13 J. Exercise tact and diplomacy in dealing with sensitive and complex issues and situations.

K. Establish and maintain effective working relationships with City management, staff, contractors, consultants, representatives of other governmental and utility agencies, business and community groups, citizens, the public and others encountered in the course of work.

5.3. Education, Training and Licenses:

Registered Professional Civil Engineer License.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 14 6. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Written responses to the RFP must be prepared as specified in proposal content, as to form, content, and sequence. No changes to responses may be made after the submittal deadline.

The requested proposal shall be uploaded to OPENGOV on or before, but no later than the Date and Time as shown on Section 1.3 of this RFP. Any responses received after this time will not be considered by the City.

The response shall be signed by an officer , or officers, authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the respondent.

The City reserves the right to waive informalities in any proposal, to reject any or all proposals, to reject one part of a proposal and accept the other, except to the extent that proposals are qualified by specific limitations, and to make awards to the Consultants whose proposal is most beneficial to the needs of the City. Bidders are solely responsible for on time submission of their electronic bid. The City will only consider bids that have been transmitted successfully and have been issued an ebid confirmation number with a time stamp from the Bid Management System indicating that the bid was submitted successfully.

Transmission of bids by any other means will not be acce pted. Bidders shall be solely responsible for informing themselves with respect to the proper utilization of the bid management system, for ensuring the capability of their computer system to upload the required documents, and for the stability of their internet service. Failure of the bidders to successfully submit electronic bids shall be at the bidders’ sole risk and no relief will be given for late and/or improperly submitted bids. Bidders experiencing any technical difficulties with the bid submission process may contact OpenGov at (650) 336 -7167 or utilize the chat bubble in the system. Neither the City, nor OpenGov, makes any guarantee as to the timely availability of assistance, or assurance that any given problem will be resolved by the bid submissi on deadline.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 15 7. EVALUATION AND RANKING OF PROPOSALS
In accordance with the Chapter 3.12 PURCHASING City Municipal Code’s objective of selecting the most qualified consultant for providing the requested services, a Review Board which is composed of appropriate staff representatives and/or qualified outside representatives, will review the proposals received and select the most qualified firms. Review Board shall rank the prospective bidder's based upon the following criteria:

No. Evaluation Criteria Scoring Method Weight (Points)

1. Experience and Qualifications

Information about the company (and all sub-
consultants) including professional licenses
held; ability to furnish required insurance and
meet stipulations of the City's "boiler plate"
agreement; details about comparable projects
completed by the firm, as well as local
experience; and its ability to provide the
required services.

Points Based 20
(20% of Total)

2. Experience of Key Personnel

Background on key personnel (including all
sub-consultants) qualifications, abilities,
familiarity with state and federal procedures,
local experience on comparable projects and
length of service with the firm, reference
information preferably with municipal
agencies.

Points Based 40
(40% of Total)

3. Project Approach/Understanding

Discussion of major issues identified on the
project and how the consultant team plans to
address them; the management approach and
organization necessary to complete the
specific project; and outline quality control
measures to ensure delivery of a quality
product on time and within budget.

Points Based 40
(40% of Total)

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 16 8. AWARD
A. After conclusion of the Evaluation and Ranking of Proposals processes, a Notification of Intent to Award may be sent to any prospective bidder's selected.

B. Award is contingent upon the successful negotiation of final contract terms and the approval of City. Negotiations shall be confidential and not subject to disclosure to competing prospective bidder's unless an agreement is reached. If contract negotiations cannot be concluded successfully, City may negotiate a contract with the next best qualified prospective bidder's or withdraw the RFP. In the event City does not approve the recommendation to award, the RFP may be cancelled without any cost or obligation of City.

C. Prices are firm fixed prices during each contract period.

D. Prices shall be negotiated for each mutually exercised optional renewal period.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 17 9. SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

9.1. Termination
A. If, in the opinion of the City of Moreno Valley, the awarded consultant fails to perform or provide prompt, efficient service, the City must have the right to terminate or cancel the Agreement upon 30-day’s written notice and pay Provider for the value of the actual work satisfactorily performed to the date of termination.

B. The City of Moreno Valley must have the right to terminate or cancel the Agreement upon 30 - day’s written notice without cause and pay Provider for the value of actual work satisfactorily performed to the date of termination.

C. These rights are in addition to any other rights that City may have available.

9.2. Public Employees Retirement Law (CalPERS)
A. CalPERS Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, in addition to obligations set forth in this section, in the event that any person providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligi ble for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of the City, to the fullest extent of the law, CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any costs and expenses incurred by City, including without limitation, payment that City is required as a result to make to CalPERS, whether in the form of employee and/or employer contributions, taxes, or any similar obligations, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest.

B. CalPERS Participation. As set forth in this Agreement and in the Req uest for Qualifications, City has an obligation to treat all persons working for or under the direction of CONSULTANT as an independent contractor of City and agents and employees of CONSULTANT, and not as agents or employees of City. CONSULTANT and City acknowledge and agree that City participates in a defined benefit plan (“CalPERS”), and that it is possible that CalPERS may find that persons providing services pursuant to this Agreement are employees of City and should be registered with the CalPERS as employees of City.

C. CalPERS Retiree Disclosure. CONSULTANT hereby expressly agrees to clearly and conspicuously disclose to City in writing any and all persons working for CONSULTANT who are retirees under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) whom receives a monthly CalPERS retirement allowance, and whom are, subject to City approval, assigned by CONSULTANT to provide services to City under the Agreement, prior to such person performing any services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted to limit a CalPERS retiree’s obligations under applicable law, rules or regulations.

D. Joint Cooperation. In the event that CalPERS initiates an inquiry that includes examination of whether individuals providing services under this Agr eement to City are City’s employees, CONSULTANT shall within five days and share all communications and documents from CalPERS that it may legally share. In the event that either CONSULTANT or City files an appeal or court challenge, CONSULTANT and City e ach agree to cooperate with each other in responding to the inquiry and any subsequent administrative appeal or court challenge of an adverse determination.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 18 9.3. Managing Federal and State Funded Projects
Depending on future funding sources, the Consultant may be assigned to manage certain federal and state-funded projects under FHWA, HUD, FEMA, and/or State Bills (SB). The work and/or services to be provided by the Consultant shall comply with all pertinent local, State, and Federal laws and regulations.

The Consultant, therefore, shall be legally able to perform services for Federal or State funded projects.

A contract DBE goal has not been established for the purpose of this RFP. However, the Consultant is required to submit the Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment (Exhibit 10-O1) as included in this RFP along with the proposal to meet Caltrans Local Assistance DBE commitment requirements. Prior to starting to work on a Federal or State funded project, the Consultant shall submit to the City for approval the Consultant Contract DBE Commitment (Exhibit 10 -O2) with the Contract DBE Goal specifically determined/approved for that project.

The Consultant shall also be required to submit the Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Exhibit 10-Q) as included in this RFP along with the proposal.

9.4. Indemnification

8.4.1 Design Professional Services. To the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 2782.8, in performing “design professional services” as defined in Section 2782.8, the Co nsultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant's employees, and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent, reckless, or willful misconduct in the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant under this RFP and/or related Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent, reckless or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.

8.4.2 For all non-design professional services, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consulta nt, or are caused or claim to be caused by the acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 19 10. SCOPE OF SERVICES

10.1. Scope of Services

Heacock Street is designated as an Arterial in the City Circulation Element. Heacock Street extends in a north/south direction from Perris Blvd at the north to the City South Border. The March Airforce Reserve Base borders Heacock Street to the west. The project limits are from San Michele Road to Harley Knox Blvd.

The project consists of all services required to complete PS&E and Environmental Documents for the widening of Heacock Street to its ultimate configuration from San Michelle to Harley Knox Blvd. including but not limited to: Complete Geotechnical Analysis and the use of the Truck Traffic Index to design the proper structural section for Heacock Street; complete the Environmental documents and process and obtain Environmental clearance under CEQA and NEPA in compliance with local, State, and Federal Funding Sources; survey; street design; ROW analysis, negotiation, and acquisition; traffic control devices (if needed); street light designs; striping and pavement markings; location of existing utilities; coordination with utility companies to determine the relocation of utilities or "protect in place", coordinate with other agencies including the March Air Reserve Base (MARB), City of Perris, Riverside County, Riverside County Flood Control District, and the local Tribal Consultations (AB-52); Coordinate with all Utilities determine location and depth of existing utilities and to allow for future utility installation during construction; support during the bidding process for clarification of the Plans and Specifications; and support during the construction process for Contractor Submittals and RFls.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 20 11. LABOR LAWS, PREVAILING WAGES
All work or services performed within the State of California pursuant to this Agreement by Contractor, Contractor’s employees and independent contractors, or Contractor’s subcontractors and its subcontractors’ employees and independent contractors shall be performed by individuals lawfully permitted to perform such work or services in the State of California and/or the United States of America pursuant to all applicable State and/or Fed eral labor laws, rules and regulations including, but not limited to, any State or Federal law, rule or regulation prohibiting the employment of undocumented workers or any other person not lawfully permitted to perform said work or services in the State of California or the United States of America.

Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee, or applicant (“person”) for employment because of race, denial of family and medical care leave, religious creed (including religious dress and grooming practices), color; national origin (including language use restrictions), ancestry, physical disability or mental disability (including HIV and Aids), medical condition (cancer and genetic characteristics), genetic information, military or veteran status, marital status, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sex (which includes pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding and medical conditions related to pregnancy, childbirth or breastfee ding), age or sexual orientation. Unless otherwise permitted under the law, Contractor shall not refuse to hire or employ any such person or refuse to select any such person for a training program leading to employment, or bar or discharge any such person from employment or from a training program leading to employment, or otherwise discriminate against any such person in compensation or in terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.

This contract is subject to prevailing wage law, including but not limited to California Labor Code 1720 et seq. Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, Contractor and all of Contractor’s subcontractors, if any, shall pay each employee engaged in all applicable trades or occupation not less than the prevailing ho urly wage rate for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In accordance with the provisions of Section 1770 of the California Labor Code (“Labor Code”), the Director of Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California has determined the general prevailing rates of wages and employer payments for health and welfare, pension, vacation, travel time, and subsis tence pay as provided for in Labor Code Section 1773.8, apprenticeship or other training programs authorized by Labor Code Section 3093 and similar purposes applicable to the work to be done. Said wages are available through the California Department of I ndustrial Relations’ Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/PWD/index.htm and are on file at City Hall, as provided in Section 1773.2 of the Labor Code.

Notwithstanding anything else to th e contrary, Contractor hereby acknowledges that all contractors and subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (“Department”) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5 in order to be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, subject to the requirements of Section 4104 of the Public Contract Code, or engage in the performance of any public work contract, including this Agreement, that is subject to the payment of prevailing wages. The Project is subject to compliance monitoring and Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 21 enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. In accordance with Section 3700 of the Labor Code, Contractor must secure payment of compensation to all Contractor’s employees. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor is re gistered with the Department in the manner prescribed by the Department and has paid the requisite application fee, as required by Labor Code Section 1725.5. Moreover, prior to Contractor entering into any contracts with any subcontractor, Contractor shall obtain proof that all such subcontractors have also registered with the Department in accordance with Section 1725.5.

Request For Proposal #2024-008
Title: HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (City Project No. 801 0010) 22 12. Vendor Questionnaire

12.1. Non-Collusion Declaration*
Please download the below documents, complete, and upload. • [C]_Attachment_C_-_Non-Coll...
*Response required

12.2. Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment*
Please download the document below, complete, and upload. • [E]_Attachment_E_-_Exhibit_...
*Response required

12.3. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities*
Please download the documents, complete, and upload.
• [F]_Attachment_F_-_Exhibit_...
*Response required

12.4. Please upload your Project Proposal.*
*Response required

12.5. Please upload your Cost Proposal.*
*Response required

EXHIBIT “B”

CONSULTANT PROPOSAL

SUBMISSION DATE

PROJECT

PREPARED FOR

PROPOSAL
2024-008

HEACOCK STREET

SOUTH EXTENSION
(City Project No. 8010010)
Technical P
roposal
M AY 27, 2024
City of Moreno Valley
(Revised 5/30/24)
Exhibit "B"
The southerly extension of Heacock Street is an exciting opportunity that will close a gap in the roadway network by constructing the ultimate roadway with south of San Michele Road to Harley Knox Boulevard that will improve vehicular, truck and bicycle circulation between the Cities of Moreno Valley and Perris. This project will also improve drainage and promote more efficient connectivity to the Harley Knox Boulevard/ I-215 Interchange for the surrounding industrial hubs and planned growth for the March Air Reserve Base (MARB) and planned Inland Port Airport/March Joint Powers Authority (March JPA) properties. Mark Thomas is excited to submit this proposal to complete PS&E and Environmental Documents for the Heacock Street South Extension.

Our Key Personnel’s Experience with the City & the Project

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
What sets our team apart? Our qualifications, our
people and our approach. As you’ll see in our proposal, the Mark Thomas T eam provides the City with the right
team to deliver this important project. For the past
97 years, Mark Thomas has been providing design
solutions that meet agency and community needs.

We have earned a reputation as experts in roadway
infrastructure projects for local agencies involving multi- jurisdictional coordination, regional drainage facilities, and accommodations for trucks. Our team of over 390
professionals brings the following benefits to the City.

LEGAL NAME
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
(Mark Thomas)

CONTACT INFORMATION
Josh Cosper, PE, PLS, QSD
[email protected]
(951) 870-3094
4200 Concourse Street, Suite 330
Ontario, CA 91764

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
California Corporation

PRINCIPALS
Our firm is led by five principals who govern
the firm through our Board of Directors. Zach
Siviglia serves as President and Chairman of the
Board with Matt Brogan, Sasha Dansky, Shawn
O’Keefe, and Matt Stringer as Vice Presidents.

AUTHORIZED SIGNER

Pat Somerville, PE
Associate Principal
Our team will be led by Josh Cosper, PE, PLS, QSD who led the efforts on the City’s previous Heacock Street Improvements & South Extension projects in the development of concepts, including NEPA/CEQA environmental clearance, preliminary engineering, final design and coordination with MARB, March JPA, and the City of Perris. He is also a known commodity to the City having delivered over a dozen similar roadway widening/reconstruction projects with drainage improvements, including the final PS&E for Heacock Street from San Michele Road to Cactus Avenue.

You will see in this proposal, clients enjoy working with Josh as he brings a programmatic view to drive project goals and schedule with a diverse technical background to step into the weeds and identify cost or time saving solutions.

We have included concepts reviewed by the stake holders previously, and correspondence from MARB on what they require to approve the project improvements in the appendix. This team’s experience will pick up where we left off streamlining discussions with Perris, MARB and March JPA early input and buy-in and saving several months on the delivery schedule.

Our Team’s Qualifications and Experience
Josh has assembled a team of strong technical experts with the right experience to deliver this project. This includes Mark Teague, AICP of Placeworks, Inc. for environmental documentation who brings 35+ years of experience, including supporting Josh previously on this project, and has outlined a comprehensive approach to CEQA and NEPA clearances and will leverage his experience in partnering with the City to continue to find efficiencies throughout delivery. John McCarthy, PE with Q3 Consulting, Inc. will utilize his 29 years of drainage experience and excellent reputation with Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC & WCD) to support Josh in the development of hydrology and hydraulics. Through his experience, he has identified over $2M in potential drainage improvements costs and his working relationships with RCFC & WCD will expedite their approval process. In addition to a multitude of in-house surveying, transportation, and structural design professionals, Ryan Bissegger will support Josh in positioning the City for available funding. Throughout the last 10 years, Ryan has secured over $1.3B in funding for local agencies on similar projects and has outlined several potential sources to assist the City in obtaining construction funding. Our strong technical team will successfully deliver the project on time and within budget. Our key personnel bring over 100 years of similar project experience and we have included several quotes from clients that testify to our qualifications.

4.2. TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 1 ends

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING AND APPROACH
Heacock Street is generally classified as a four-lane arterial roadway with a 50-mph design speed between Harley
Knox Boulevard to the south and San Michele Road to
the north with Class II bike lanes along each shoulder, sidewalks, and parkways. Although not currently classified as a truck route, (trucks currently use San Michele Road to Indian Street and Perris Boulevard) trucks will utilize this segment once constructed as a bypass and a T raffic Index (TI) of 12 should be considered which is typical of a truck route. In combination with a higher TI, we understand the need to evaluate multiple pavement sections as R-Values are generally low in this area (between 30 and 40) based and the existing pavement is approximately 4” of AC over 4” CAB based on the 2013 geotechnical investigations completed for this previously. Alternative roadway sections such as pulverization or use of cement treated base could save substantial excavation and costs.

PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS
Based upon on our review of the project constraints and available information, we have compiled the following considerations and key challenges necessary to complete this project.

Exhibit 1: Project Constraints Map
Geotechnical investigations must include concrete
pavement options at the San Michele Road to
accommodate airport landslide facility trucks.

Widening will impact the existing earthen trapezoidal
channel southwest of the San Michele Road intersection.

All vertical improvements (street lights, signals, signs) within the Airport Clear Zone must be designed with breakaway
bolts and to shear on impact.

New driveway must be designed to accommodate trucks
during and after construction.

Existing curves are significantly smaller than normal crown requirements for horizontal curves per Riverside County and Caltrans standards.

RCFC & WCD Master Drainage Plans for the Sunnymeade
Moreno area did not include current airport development, the project must include a comprehensive drainage study to analyze the dual 14’x9’ RCB along Perris Valley Channel Lateral B capacity.

Improvements within Perris Valley Channel Lateral B will require 401, 404 and 1602 approvals in addition to an RCFC & WCD encroachment permit.

Project improvements south of the Perris Valley Channel Lateral B will require approvals from Perris.

Harley Knox roundabout was designed to accommodate a
northerly extension. A new connection must include fastest path, path overlap, and truck tracking performance tests to maximize roundabout operations post-construction.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 1
2 A
B
C
D
E
GF
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 X ID
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 2 ends

Right-of-Way
As shown on Exhibit 1: Project Constraints Map on the previous page, widening improvements and extending Heacock Street south of the Perris Valley Channel Lateral B includes impacts to the following properties:

As demonstrated in the May 30, 2013 correspondence from the Department of the Air Force included in our appendix, Josh and the City previously circulated concepts for their approval on this project receiving vital feedback on how to streamline their approvals. This team will pick up where we left off from our previous efforts to streamline initial correspondence with MARB and March Inland Port Airport Authority (March JPA) staff.

Drainage
Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District’s (RCFC & WCD) current
Master Drainage Plan (Sunnymeade Moreno MDP) does
not include recent updates associated with redevelopment on the March Air Reserve Base. Josh led efforts in 2013 for the City and developed preliminary drainage analysis as summarized to the right. Over 2,800 cubic feet per
second (CFS) confluences through 3 major reaches at
the Perris Valley Channel (PVC) Lateral B/Heacock Street RCB crossing. We will revisit the previous efforts, update consistent with current and planned upstream land use
and evaluate capacity of this crossing. Previous analysis indicated the dual 14’x9’ wide reinforced concrete
box crossing was insufficient to handle 100 year event
confluences from the three upstream tributaries. This
project must include evaluation of either how to reduce upstream flow rates or improvements to increase hydraulic capacity to the existing crossing.

PARCEL ID OWNERSHIP APNS R/W INTERESTS/CONSIDERATIONS
March Inland Port
Airport Authority 294-180-054 Permanent R/W. Interim and permanent Homeland Security barriers must be in place at all times.

Jose & Marth Perez 316-211-007 Permanent R/W and TCE for roadway grading.

First Industrial 316-211-001, 009, 010, 013 Permanent R/W and TCE for roadway grading.

Lawrence Family Trust 316-211-014 Permanent R/W and TCE for roadway grading.

RCFC & WCD 316-211-016, 017,
302-020-037
Permanent R/W and approvals through an
encroachment permit process / cooperative agreement.

United States 294-180-047,
294-200-002, 314-153-072
Permanent R/W. Acquisition will require approximately
36 months and congressional approval for any right-of-
way transactions. This must start early in design.

Carolyn Brazil &
Carl Boyd 302-020-036, 051 Permanent R/W and TCE for roadway grading.

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
X Parcel ID per Exhibit 1 on previous page
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 3 ends

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Through our extensive experience on similar projects and through Josh’s previous experience working with the City and the various stakeholders on Heacock Street, we have identified a project approach that includes what project infrastructure to provide, how to position the City for funding for construction, and project approvals necessary to complete this project.

Develop Project Infrastructure
The following represents key project infrastructure and project elements that will position the City for success through minimizing project costs, helps establish the foundation for a fundable project, and builds off of previous support from surrounding stakeholders.

Provide concrete pavement within the limits of the truck deceleration limits at the San Michele Road intersection.

The existing Heacock Street earthen channel (top width
of 20 feet +/- and depths ranging from 5-6 feet) is
within the ultimate Heacock Street widening limits. It is also sized to accommodate approximately 30% of the
341 CFS expected flow rates. Conversion to a box culvert (approximately 12’ wide x 6’ tall) in lieu of the earthen channel will significantly reduce R/W needed and save
approximately $1M in lieu of moving and widening the
earthen channel to avoid widening improvements.

Use remnant areas created by the project alignment
as a flow through detention basin. Per 2013 MARB
correspondence, these basins must comply with Bird/
Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH) guidelines, and
would provide nearly a 20-25% downstream reduction
in drainage facility needs saving nearly $1M in
construction costs.

Incorporation of superelevations in lieu of normal
crowns and evaluation of design speed reductions using
Assembly Bill 43 provisions would greatly minimize the
required acquisition through significant reduction in the horizontal radii saving approximately $500K.

Provide drainage improvements to accommodate
connections to existing dual 24” RCP and 30” RCP MARB
outlets into project drainage.

Ideally, hydrology and hydraulics will support extension of existing dual 14’ wide x 9’ high RCB, however project may need to consider a single span bridge or RCB
replacement to increase hydraulic capacity.

Use National Cooperative Highway Research Program
(NCHRP) 672 guidance and performance tests (path
overlap, fastest path, truck turning) to roundabout
connection and optimize Heacock Street operations/safety. 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 4 ends

Position for Grant Funding
The Project has multiple elements that can be leveraged to secure grant funding for construction. Mark Thomas has extensive experience securing competitive funding for similar projects and we have identified the strategy below.

Grant Programs that Aligns with Project Elements
Mark Thomas has identified the following grant programs we feel can help the City position to help secure construction funding. Our goal is to maximize outside funding for this project, including any required funding match. • Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (TCEP): Project provides freight connectivity and reduced travel times for distribution centers/warehousing and the I-215 freight corridor. Including zero emission vehicle infrastructure in the City will increase competitiveness.
• Measure A Regional Arterial Program (MARA): Constructing a four-lane arterial connection to Harley Knox Boulevard will meet eligibility requirements for RCTC’s program to improve the County’s arterial network. • RCFC & WCD Area Drainage Plan Fees: Working with RCFC & WCD to develop an updated hydrology/hydraulic analysis of the base and corresponding Master Drainage Plan (MDP) facilities and installation of proposed facilities will allow the City to use County Area Drainage Plan fees for proposed drainage infrastructure. • Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE): The Project will benefit neighboring disadvantaged communities by providing accessibility to economic opportunity and improve air quality. The improvements will also address climate resiliency through drainage improvements and lowering vehicle emissions.
• Active Transportation Program (ATP) / State Senate Bill 821 (SB 821): Installation of bikeways along Heacock Street and the Class I trail along the south side of PVC Lateral B would greatly enhance connectivity in existing bike networks between Perris and Moreno Valley. These improvements would be eligible for both grant programs while increasing support from the communities, bicycle advocacy groups and the City of Perris.

MARB is a military reserve base that
provides intermodal opportunities
for distribution centers in the City
and Perris.

MARB onsite and adjacent freight
businesses require efficient truck
access to I-215.

The existing roadway network has
longer trip distances that can be
reduced to lower vehicle miles
traveled.

Providing active transportation
facilities along the RCFC WCD will
increase regional connectivity and
mode shift.

Adjacent census tracts in the City
are identified as disadvantaged
communities with poor air quality.
1 2
3 4
3 5
1 1
2 2
5 4
1 3
Key project elements to identify ideal grant funding
1 2
3 4
5 1 1
2 2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 5 ends

OBTAIN PROJECT APPROVALS
After review of the surrounding agencies/stakeholders, we have identified the following approvals/project permits necessary to construct project improvements, and recommendations for CEQA/NEPA compliance.

Regulatory Agencies:

These agencies will require coordination to obtain the following regulatory permits and approvals prior to construction. • RCTC/RCA: Prior to submitting permit applications to agencies below, the City must schedule a pre-permit meeting with all agencies through RCTC.
• USACE: Clean Water Act Section 404
(PVC Lateral B improvements).
• SWRCB: Clean Water Act Section 401
(PVC Lateral B improvements).
• CDFW: California Fish and Game Code Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement
(PVC Lateral B Improvements).
• USFWS: Section 7/Section 10 Endangered Species Act consultation and Incidental T ake Permit issuance (if necessary).

Agencies with Jurisdiction:

These agencies are stakeholders that any work within their jurisdiction shall be per their design guidelines and will require permits/property acquisition. • RCFC & WCD: Encroachment permit for all work within PVC Lateral B and cooperative agreement for all MDP facilities built to be maintained/owned by RCFC & WCD.
• City of Perris: Encroachment permit and use of their design standards for all improvements to Heacock Street south of PVC Channel Lateral B.
• MARB / Inland Port Airport Authority: Approvals for
infrastructure located within Airport Clear Zone and to acquire any property rights needed for the Project.

Agencies
with
Jurisdiction
Regulatory
Agencies
RCTC
RCA
USACE
SWRCB

USFWS CDFW
March JPA
Perris
MARB

RCFC & WCD
CEQA Considerations
Project improvements are consistent with Moreno Valley’s general plan and SCAG regional models making this
Project a viable candidate for exemption through CEQA
Guidelines § 15183. While an initial study could be used, the impacts of this project are few, and an initial study is likely unnecessary. We will provide a technical memorandum
with key points from technical studies supporting the
findings. This approach would save the City several months of public circulation and documentation.

NEPA Considerations
With no federal funding identified currently, there is no nexus to create a lead agency to support NEPA documentation.

NEPA requirements differ based on lead agency
preferences. T echnical studies, tribal consultation and historic preservation, and an Environmental Assessment (EA) will be performed in accordance with CWA Section 404 and Rivers and Harbors Act (USACE approvals), however should federal grant funds be identified we can pivot with the City to add to NEPA studies and documentation to support funding lead agencies needs.

Technical Studies
Include biological resources assessment, wetland delineation, traffic operations and VMT, local/regional hydrology and hydraulics, cultural/historical including tribal consultations, air quality/ghg, and noise. 2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 6 ends

MANAGEMENT APPROACH

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PHILOSOPHY
Our team believes that strong, proactive project management is key to successful project delivery, and it starts with the project manager. Josh Cosper will lead the Mark Thomas team and will ensure that we function as a true extension of City staff. He has been very successful with the following approach to multi-modal projects where its critical to balance input from the public with challenging geometric constraints for dozens of public agencies throughout Southern California, including over 10 projects in your City:

1. Early Risk Identification: This is more than the development of a matrix, its fleshing out risk at the front end to allow more design flexibility and eliminate unforeseen costs or delays during design development. We have already identified several specialized guidelines (Airport Clear Zone, BASH, MARB previous identified concerns in 2013), as well as drainage and geometric design elements from his previous experience working with the City on the project. Backing this up with detailed research and coordination with utilities and right-of-way prior to concept development to confirm we avoid costly right-of-way and utility impacts. His approach also includes constant constructability reviews and site walks from conception to final submittal so no stone is unturned to minimize risk to the project.

2. Well Rounded and Highly Technical: Throughout Josh’s 20 years of experience, he has delivered over fifty similar multi-modal roadway improvement projects, nearly 50 miles in storm drain and low impact development infrastructure and was the program management lead for dozens of transportation corridor projects with confined right-of-way and utilities. This experience gives him a big picture point of view for meeting project goals and critical milestones, with the ability to stay in the weeds to ensure high quality deliverables, ample detail is provided in the plans and specifications, and identification cost effective solutions to constraints and project challenges.

3. Creativity and Innovation: There is no black and white solution to constraints, and often it’s balancing a combination of different solutions to present to clients with our recommendation and pro’s/con’s/costs for consensus. Its also identifying atypical and creative solutions that often turn out best. We have outlined several concepts that would save significant construction costs, but also improvements and ideas to enhance buy in from the City of Perris and RCFC & WCD. Ask any of the references provided, this is where Josh and Mark Thomas shine as we have a reputation of identifying cost and time saving outside of the box solutions for out clients.

4. Pro-Active Communication: We have a poster in each of our office conference rooms with the title “Client Satisfaction”. Most of this philosophy starts with ensuring we guide the process, don’t let the project guide you. Immediate responses to inquiries, constant communication, reigning in stakeholders and incorporating their input for their buy-in and approvals, always set expectations, and provide regular updates are pillars of his approach. This includes providing solutions when presenting problems. He has a proven reputation for proactive leadership.

CONTINUING PREVIOUS MOMENTUM
Our team’s previous experience on this project (Josh as the Project Manager and Mark T eague as the Environmental Lead through concept development and feasibility), combined with our current efforts leading the Harley Knox Boulevard / Interstate 215 Interchange Improvements Project for the City of Perris, our team is posed to hit the ground running.

Josh providing a right-of-way and utility
management training session for the
APWA Inland Empire branch recently
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 7 ends

You will see in our schedule, we will leverage
the following to engage stakeholders for
buy-in within the first 120 days after Notice
to Proceed is issued by the City:

1. Upon updating initial concepts
based on new topographic and
utility conditions, re-engage our 2013
correspondence with MARB through
work shops to illustrate how their
concerns are mitigated with updated
concepts. March JPA should be
included in this correspondence as well.

2. With our traffic analysis and development
of the Harley Knox Boulevard interchange
modifications, we are well aware of the
City of Perris’ concerns. Their focus will be
on minimizing their costs and ensuring
the new connection to the roundabout
does not decrease the level of service
and operations.

3. Q3 and Josh have long standing
working relationships with RCFC &
WCD on obtaining MDP approvals. We
must engage their planning group to
lock in ADP Fee contributions. Including
early correspondence with their permits
WHAT DO OUR CLIENTS SAY ABOUT OUR TEAM?
“Josh has delivered over a dozen roadway and transportation infrastructure projects involving significant roadway and drainage improvements, from preliminary engineering through final design for me in the Cities of Moreno Valley, Lake Elsinore and Corona.

He does exceptional work, his work products are always high quality, and has always delivered his projects for me on time and within budget.”
Peter Ramey, City of Riverside
(909) 855-1720, [email protected]
“Mark Thomas has been excellent to work with on our Palomar Street Complete Streets Project. They been very responsive to the City’s needs, partnered with the City to draft multiple design alternatives that accommodate both existing and future needs, excellent with identifying cost-effective roadway and drainage improvements, and assisted with technical support for a project grant application. The City has been very pleased with the quality of their work and service.”
Jason Farag Wildomar CIP Manager
(951) 677-7751 Ext. 219, [email protected]
group will lock in design and maintenance concerns before PA&ED completion which will stream line right-of-way acquisition efforts and the permit/cooperative agreement process.

BUDGET & QUALITY
We plan our work using a resource loaded schedule through our Deltek accounting software, monitor the project progress, and track the planned budget vs. actuals, and we report this to the City on a monthly basis. We review and report any variations along with a corrective action plan. Construction estimates are derived using a combination of recently completed bids within the local area, Caltrans unit cost database, City historical information, and RS Means available information adjusted for economies of scale and escalation. Lastly, we are committed to quality starting with the use of Bluebeam Software, Inc. as the primary source for QA/QC reviews. Key staff are assigned for each review level with shared access. This streamlines multiple reviews and provides a comprehensive product we provide to the clients to verify QC was completed. The graphic below represents our proven approach to providing the City excellent quality:

DISCIPLINE

REVIEWS

QUALITY

ASSURANCE

INDEPENDENT

REVIEWS

INTER-DISCIPLINE

REVIEWS

PERFORMED BY
Technical Leaders

PERFORMED BY
Quality Manager

PERFORMED BY
Technical Experts
Constructability Team

PERFORMED BY
Technical Leaders
Project Managers
GOAL
To validate all components
within a discipline,
including specifications,
plans, studies, reports,
standards conformance,
quantities, estimates and
other documents
GOAL
To verify that the quality
control process conforms
with procedures prior to
client submittal, including
QA documentation,
closeout checklists,
signatures and audits
GOAL
To use independent peer
review teams to evaluate
project components
for the thoroughness,
completeness and
adherence to project goals
and schedules
GOAL
To provide consistency
among disciplines by
eliminating conflicts and
promoting collaboration
in the production of all
engineering documents
related to the project

2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 8 ends

PROJECT WORK PLAN & DELIVERABLES
Mark Thomas brings significant experience in delivering roadway/drainage improvement projects for local agencies. We have outlined the following Project Work Plan with related Deliverables and have included a more comprehensive scope of services in the appendices section corresponding to each of the tasks and deliverables included below. This comprehensive approach is tried and tested as we have refined it through dozens of similar roadway/drainage improvement projects for local agencies throughout Southern California. Most recently, a very similar approach was utilized on our McKinley Street Grade Separation Project in Corona and Limonite Avenue Gap Closure in Eastvale, both of which were transportation improvement projects involving multi-jurisdictional approvals with preliminary design, NEPA/CEQA compliance, final design, and bidding/construction support milestones. This approach allows granularity/transparency for both our clients and us to monitor schedule and budget, while also providing natural check points that create flexibility to pivot on key decisions that can either save time through streamlining remaining activities or costs through reassessing project improvements and needs.

Detailed Scope of Work can be found in the Appendices Section.

TASK 1 | PROJECT MANAGEMENT/ADMINISTRATION
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

1.1 Project Administration

1.2 Project T eam Meetings

1.3 Quality Control & Quality Assurance (QC/QA)
» Meeting Attendance, Agendas, and Minutes
» Quality Control Checklists
TASK 2 | RESEARCH & FIELD INVESTIGATION
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

2.1 Field Investigations / Site Photos

2.2 Record Maps / As-Built Research

2.3 Survey

2.4 Utilities
» Field Notes, 360 Degree Photography Log
» Compiled Research / Record Plans
» Project Control Plan Sheet, PNEZD Project Control
Report, T opographic Survey Base Map, Land Net Base
Map, Digital T errain Model (DTM)
» A-B-C Utility Letters, Utility Matrix, Utility Base Map TASK 3 | NEPA/CEQA COMPLIANCE
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

3.1 Coor dination / Meetings

3.2 Project

3.3 Description T echnical Analysis

3.4 CEQ A/NEPA Environmental Analysis
» Field Notes, 360 Degree Photography Log
» Compiled Research / Record Plans
» Project Control Plan Sheet, PNEZD Project Control
Report, T opographic Survey Base Map, Land Net Base
Map, Digital T errain Model (DTM)
» A-B-C Utility Letters, Utility Matrix, Utility Base Map, Utility Potholes (10), Pothole Result Report
TASK 4 | REPORTS & CALCULATIONS
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

4.1 Hydrology / Hydraulics Analysis

4.2 Vehicle Miles T raveled (VMT) Assessment/
T ransportation Study

4.3 Geotechnical Investigations

4.4 Roundabout Performance T ests

4.5 Funding Assessment / Support
» Hydrology / Hydraulics Analysis
» VMT Assessment Memorandum, T ransportation Study
» Pavement Memorandum,
Preliminary Foundation Memorandum
» Roundabout Performance T ests
» Funding Assessment
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 9 ends

TASK 5 | PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

5.1 Geometric Approval Drawings

5.2 Preliminary Cost Estimate

5.3 Project Report
» Geometric Approval Drawings
» Preliminary Cost Estimate
» Project Report
TASK 6 | PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATES
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

6.1 Improvement Plans

6.2 Estimate

6.3 Specifications
» PS&E at 65%, 90% and Final Submittals
» Comment Resolution Matrix at 65% and 90% Submittals
» Comment Resolution Meetings after 65% and 90%
Submittals
– City of Moreno Valley
– City of Perris
– RCFC & WCD
– MARB
– March JPA
TASK 7 | RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

7.1 Right-of-Way Requirements/Legals & Plat Maps

7.2 Appraisals/Review Appraisals

7.3 Negotiations

7.4 Escrow Coordination
» Right-of-Way Requirements Maps, Legal Descriptions
and Plat Map Exhibits
» Appraisal Reports, Review Appraisal Reports (up to 1). » Negotiation Services
» Escrow Coordination Services
TASK 8 | BIDDING & SUPPORT DURING CONSTRUCTION
WBS TASK: DELIVERABLES:

8.1 Bidding Support

8.2 Design Support During Construction

8.3 As-Built Preparation
» Responses to Bidding Questions, Prepare Addenda,
Attend Pre-bid Meeting
» Conformed Construction Improvement PS&Es
» Review Construct Materials Submittals, Conduct Job
Walk, Response to Construction RFIs
» Prepare As-Built Plans
Title Sheet
Construction Notes
Survey Control Plan
Typical Sections
Construction Details
Curb Ramp/
Driveway Details
Demolition Plans
Storm Drain/
Drainage Plans
Detention Basin
Grading Plans
Layout and Pr
ofiles
Signing and Striping Plans
Lighting & Conduit Plans
This gap closure and bridge project is nearly complete with all of the bridge work within San Bernardino County’s Cucamonga Creek, and should open to the public in August, 2024
City of Corona McKinley Street Grade Separation
Est. Completion Date: Jan 2025 | Total Project Cost: $145M City of Eastvale Limonite Gap Closure
Est. Completion Date: Aug 2024 | Total Project Cost: $27.5M New bridge has been fabricated on-site and ready to move over the BNSF Railroad and RCFC & WCD’s Arlington Channel (Optional)
(Optional)
(Optional)
(Optional)
(Optional)
(Optional)
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 10 ends

PROJECT SCHEDULE
Our team is mobilized and ready to hit the ground running using our past experience with the City on this Project and with the stakeholders involved. Below is our proposed schedule and areas we have identified that are critical to the delivery of this project.

ID Task
Mode
Task Name Duration Start Finish
1 CC oo nn tt rr aa cc tt AA dd mm ii nn ii ss tt rr aa tt ii oo nn 66 dd aa yy ss TT uu ee 77 // 11 66 // 22 44 TT uu ee 77 // 22 33 // 22 44 2 Contract Award 1 day Tue 7/16/24 Tue 7/16/24
3 Issuance of NTP 5 days Wed 7/17/24 Tue 7/23/24
4 PP rr oo jj ee cc tt MM aa nn aa gg ee mm ee nn tt 88 88 55 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 77 // 22 44 // 22 44 TT uu ee 11 22 // 11 44 // 22 77 5 Kickoff Meeting 5 days Wed 7/24/24 Tue 7/30/24
6 PDT Meetings 500 days Wed 7/31/24 Tue 6/30/26
7 Project Administration 880 days Wed 7/31/24 Tue 12/14/27 8 RR ee ss ee aa rr cc hh aa nn dd FF ii ee ll dd II nn vv ee ss tt ii gg aa tt ii oo nn ss 55 55 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 77 // 33 11 // 22 44 TT uu ee 99 // 88 // 22 66 9 Site Visit 5 days Wed 7/31/24 Tue 8/6/24
10 Record Maps / As-Builts Research 10 days Wed 7/31/24 Tue 8/13/24 11 Survey 60 days Wed 8/14/24 Tue 11/5/24
12 UU tt ii ll ii tt ii ee ss 55 55 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 77 // 33 11 // 22 44 TT uu ee 99 // 88 // 22 66 13 Introductory Letters / Mapping 5 days Wed 7/31/24 Tue 8/6/24 14 Relocation Claim Letters 20 days Wed 4/8/26 Tue 5/5/26 15 Notice to Owner to Relocate 20 days Wed 8/12/26 Tue 9/8/26 16 NN EE PP AA // CC EE QQ AA CC oo mm pp ll ii aa nn cc ee 44 00 55 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 77 // 33 11 // 22 44 TT uu ee 22 // 11 77 // 22 66 17 Project Scoping / Description 40 days Wed 7/31/24 Tue 9/24/24 18 Draft Technical Studies 210 days Wed 9/25/24 Tue 7/15/25 19 City Review 20 days Wed 7/16/25 Tue 8/12/25
20 Final Technical Studies 20 days Wed 8/13/25 Tue 9/9/25 21 Draft Initial Study / Environmental Assessment 40 days Wed 9/10/25 Tue 11/4/25 22 City Review 20 days Wed 11/5/25 Tue 12/2/25
23 Final Draft Initial Study / Environmental Assessment10 days Wed 12/3/25 Tue 12/16/25 24 Public Review / Adoption 45 days Wed 12/17/25 Tue 2/17/26 25 EE nn gg ii nn ee ee rr ii nn gg SS tt uu dd ii ee ss 11 55 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 99 // 22 55 // 22 44 TT uu ee 44 // 22 22 // 22 55 26 Hydrology / Hydraulics 120 days Wed 9/25/24 Tue 3/11/25 27 Traffic Operations / VMT Assessment 60 days Wed 9/25/24 Tue 12/17/24 28 Geotechnical Investigations 60 days Wed 11/6/24 Tue 1/28/25 29 Roundabout Performance Tests 40 days Wed 12/4/24 Tue 1/28/25 30 Funding Assessment 20 days Wed 3/26/25 Tue 4/22/25
31 PP rr ee ll ii mm ii nn aa rr yy EE nn gg ii nn ee ee rr ii nn gg 11 33 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 11 11 // 66 // 22 44 TT uu ee 55 // 66 // 22 55 32 Preliminary GADs and Estimate 60 days Wed 11/6/24 Tue 1/28/25 33 Agency Submittal and Review 30 days Wed 1/29/25 Tue 3/11/25 34 Agency Workshops 10 days Wed 3/12/25 Tue 3/25/25
35 Project Report 30 days Wed 3/26/25 Tue 5/6/25
36 PP ll aa nn ss ,, SS pp ee cc ii ff ii cc aa tt ii oo nn ss ,, aa nn dd EE ss tt ii mm aa tt ee 22 22 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 11 22 // 11 77 // 22 55 TT uu ee 11 00 // 22 00 // 22 66 37 65% PS&E 80 days Wed 12/17/25 Tue 4/7/26
38 Agency Review 20 days Wed 4/8/26 Tue 5/5/26
39 65% Workshops 10 days Wed 5/6/26 Tue 5/19/26
40 90% PS&E 60 days Wed 5/20/26 Tue 8/11/26
41 Agency Review 20 days Wed 8/12/26 Tue 9/8/26
42 90% Workshops 10 days Wed 9/9/26 Tue 9/22/26
43 Final Submittal 20 days Wed 9/23/26 Tue 10/20/26
44 RR ii gg hh tt oo ff WW aa yy AA cc qq uu ii ss ii tt ii oo nn 66 33 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 77 // 33 11 // 22 44 TT uu ee 11 22 // 22 99 // 22 66 45 Right of Way Requirements / L&Ps 20 days Wed 4/8/26 Tue 5/5/26 46 Appraisals/Review Appraisals 40 days Wed 5/6/26 Tue 6/30/26 47 Negotiations 90 days Wed 7/1/26 Tue 11/3/26
48 Escrow Coordination 40 days Wed 11/4/26 Tue 12/29/26 49 USA Property Acquisition 600 days Wed 7/31/24 Tue 11/17/26 50 RR ee gg uu ll aa tt oo rr yy PP ee rr mm ii tt ss // AA pp pp rr oo vv aa ll ss 22 55 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 44 // 88 // 22 66 TT uu ee 33 // 22 33 // 22 77 51 City of Perris Encroachment Permit 210 days Wed 4/8/26 Tue 1/26/27 52 RCFC & WCD Encroachment Permit 210 days Wed 4/8/26 Tue 1/26/27 53 RR ee gg uu ll aa tt oo rr yy PP ee rr mm ii tt ss 22 55 00 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 44 // 88 // 22 66 TT uu ee 33 // 22 33 // 22 77 54 RCA Pre-Permit Application 40 days Wed 4/8/26 Tue 6/2/26 55 CFGC - Section 1602 (CDFW) 180 days Wed 6/3/26 Tue 2/9/27 56 Section 7 (USFWS) 180 days Wed 6/3/26 Tue 2/9/27
57 CWA Section 401 (CARWQCB) 180 days Wed 6/3/26 Tue 2/9/27 58 CWA Section 404 (USACE) 210 days Wed 6/3/26 Tue 3/23/27 59 BB ii dd dd ii nn gg // PP rr oo cc uu rr ee mm ee nn tt 33 55 dd aa yy ss WW ee dd 33 // 22 44 // 22 77 TT uu ee 55 // 11 11 // 22 77 60 Bidding & Procurement Phase 30 days Wed 3/24/27 Tue 5/4/27 61 Construction Contract Award 5 days Wed 5/5/27 Tue 5/11/27

J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J 2025 2026 2027
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
External Tasks
External Milestone
Deadline
Progress
Manual Progress
City of Moreno Valley
Heacock Street South Extension - City Project No. 8 01 0010)

Page 1 ends

Project: Project Schedule
Date: Fri 5/24/24
agreements for improvements to be constructed with the project that benefit MARB will accelerate their approval process, and combined with the early base discussions will ensure MARB property acquisition will not delay the project.

Acquisition of federally owned properties will
require 2 Years minimum. We must MARB staff
approval first, than it will require Department of
Defense approvals. Having just acquired property
from the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station
for OCTA, Monument will position us with MARB
staff early to take this off critical path. In lieu
Environmental Assessment and Technical Studies will be developed in accordance with USACE’s guidelines (33 CFR Part 230, USACE Engineer Regulation (ER) 200-2-2, and Engineer Circular (EC) 1165-2-220). This a lead agency for NEPA. With the pending USACE Clean
Water Act Section 404 Approvals needed by the USACE
for work within the Perris Valley Channel Lateral B, our will allow the NEPA process to move forward and cover
permitting / typical NEPA requirements. This team also
has the flexibility to shift to using other templates / guidelines should the City procure federal funding and a lead agency identified.

With no federal funding, it creates a
challenge as there is no nexus to establish
With no federal funding, it creates
a challenge as there is no nexus to
establish a lead agency for NEPA. With the
pending USACE Clean Water Act Section
404 Approvals needed by the US Army
Corp of Engineers (USACE) for work within
the Perris Valley Channel Lateral B, our
Environmental Assessment and Technical
Studies will be developed in accordance
with USACE’s guidelines (33 CFR Part 230,
USACE Engineer Regulation (ER) 200-2-2,
and Engineer Circular (EC) 1165-2-220).

This will allow the NEPA process to
move forward and cover permitting /
typical NEPA requirements. This team
also has the flexibility to shift to using
other templates / guidelines should the
City procure federal funding and a lead
agency identified.
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 11 ends

PROJECT RESOURCES
This team has extensive resources with significant experience working on similar transportation projects in the Inland Empire with multiple jurisdictional approvals and regional drainage infrastructure. As shown below in our labor distribute chart, our team was built to deliver this project. There isn’t high number of full time equivalents necessary to deliver this project, however it needs a highly specialized team with supporting staff to manage the ebbs and flows at each submittal and key decision point.

Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
As shown below, we have the key staff and supporting team members/resources necessary to deliver this project.

Initial Research & Mobilization
T opographic survey and boundary retracement
efforts are the key deliverables here. Dave
Moritz, PLS with Mark Thomas will support
Josh through these tasks. Dave brings over 30
years of experience managing survey efforts
for corridor projects and his team has 7 survey
crews and over 40 land surveying professionals
to support him through these tasks.

Preliminary Engineering
Key deliverables through this phase are the
Engineering Studies, GADs, and Project Reports /
Estimates. Josh will utilize Kimberly Barling, PE to
support him, and we have a staff of over 20 civil
engineering professionals in our Ontario office to
support them. Fehr & Peers and Q3 each have
over 10 transportation/ drainage professionals,
respectively to support on the traffic and
drainage studies needed to complete this phase.

NEPA / CEQA Compliance
Malia Durand who brings over 20 years of
experience will support Mark T eague in the
development of technical studies and the IS/
EA. Placeworks has over 10 archaeological,
biological, palaeontological and technical
professionals to keep these tasks on schedule.
1 2
3 Right-of-Way Acquisition
Kim Bibolet, SR/WA, R/W-NAC of Monument,
Inc. will utilize her 15 years of experience to lead
property acquisition/negotiations. She will be
supported with a team of over 10 appraisers,
acquisition agents, and specialists to support her
as necessary. She brings substantial experience
within the Inland Empire and acquiring properties
for local agencies, including federal lands.

Plans, Specifications & Estimates
Kimberly Barling, PE will support Josh in the
development of PS&E through the 65%, 90%
and Final Design phases. Our in house team in
our Ontario office has 5 professional engineers
and over 15 engineering designs/professionals
ready and available to support this team.

Project Management
Josh is ready, available and committed through
this project to supporting the City. He has a
reputation in Moreno Valley for delivering several
projects and its largely based on his customer
service focused approach and a commitment
start to finish. Pat Somerville, PE with over
30 years of experience will support Josh as
necessary as the Principal in Charge through the
life of the project ensuring adequate resources.
4 5
6 2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 12 ends

LOCAL

AGENCY PROJECT NAME

RELEVANT FEATURES
Multiple Jurisdictions

NEPA/CEQA
Local Roadway Widening
Active Transportation
Curb Ramps/ADA
Roundabout Analysis
Hydrology/Hydraulics
RCFC & WCD Facilities

WQMP/TPC
Boundary Retracement
Legal Descriptions/
Acquisition Documents
Complex Utilities & ROW
Moreno
Valley
Heacock Street Improvements [FP] X X X X X X X X X X X X Alessandro Boulevard Improvements X X X X X X X X X X X Day Street Drainage Improvement Project X X X X
Moreno T ownsite Drainage Improvements X X X X
Riverside
County Nuevo Road Improvements [FP]

X X X X X X X X X X X
Eastvale
Limonite Gap Closure [FP] X X X X X X X X X X X X
Scholar Way & Harrison Street ATP Cycle 4 X X X X X X X X Wildomar Palomar Street Complete Streets [FP] X X X X X X X X X X Temecula Cherry Street Extension X X X X X X X X X X X
Corona McKinley Street Grade Separation X X X X X X X X X X X X Perris I-215/Harley Knox Interchange X X X X X X X X X X X Indio
Madison Street Widening X X X X X X X X X X
Avenue 50 Street Improvements X X X X X X X X X X
Palm
Springs
Hermosa Avenue Widening

X X X X X X X X X
Line 21/22 and Mesquite Road
Improvements X X X X X X X X X
Ontario Vine Avenue and B Street Bike Boulevard X X X X X Glendale
Garden River Bridge X X X X X X X X
San Fernando Street Beautification X X X X X X
Orange
County
OC Loop Segment D X X X X X X X
OC Loop Segments O, P , Q X X X X X X X
Brea Canyon Widening X X X X X X X X X X
Irvine
Bake Parkway/Jeronimo Road Improvements X X X X X X X X X Jeffrey Road/Irvine Center Drive
Widening Improvements X X X X X X X X X
Yorba Linda
Savi Ranch Parkway Widening X X X X X X X X X
Yorba Linda Boulevard Widening X X X X X X X X X
Norco
Hamner Avenue Widening X X X X X X X X X X X
Second Street Widening X X X X X X X X X X X

RELATED EXPERIENCE
Mark Thomas has been providing services for 97 years. We have experience throughout Southern California taking a wide variety of projects from conceptual to final design PS&E, each with features that align with your scope of services. The table below presents a representative sample of Mark Thomas and our key personnel’s project experience.

FP = Featured Project
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 13 ends

CLIENT CONTACT
City of Moreno Valley
Quang Nguyen, PE, MPA
[email protected]
(951) 413-3159

PROJECT DURATION
2007 - 2014

KEY STAFF
Josh Cosper (PM)
Mark Teague (NEPA/CEQA)
At a previous firm, Mark Thomas’ project manager, Josh Cosper, was responsible for the preliminary design, NEPA/CEQA environmental clearance, and the design of ultimate and phased roadway widening improvements (two-lanes to six-lanes) for Heacock Street from harley Knox Boulevard to Cactus Avenue over two phases of projects.

Phase I included improvements from San Michele Road to Cactus Avenue, and included acquisition efforts to approximately 20 parcels including lands owned by March Air Reserve Base and march Joint Powers Authority. This phase also included bridge modifications to the Perris Valley Channel Laterial A crossing.

Phase II included design through 65% for the section from Harley Knox Road through San Michele Road (project being shelved due to funding limitations).

Project included the development of a conceptual multi-lane roundabout, bridge modification at the Perris Valley Channel crossing, and hydraulic analysis/ regional detention basin design for a 3500 acre watershed.

This project was delivered under the original proposed budget.

LIMONITE AVENUE GAP CLOSURE | EASTVALE

CLIENT CONTACT
City of Eastvale
Yurhi Choi, PE
[email protected]
(951) 703-4471

PROJECT DURATION
07/2019 - Current

KEY STAFF
Josh Cosper (PM)
Pat Somerville (PIC)
Kimberly Barling (Civil Engineer)
John McCarthy (Hydrology/Hydraulics)
Alahesh Thurairajah (Geotechnical)
Paul Herrmann (Traffic)
Mark Thomas is providing planning and final design for the gap closure of Limonite Avenue. The project includes a Class I trail system along the new bridge crossing the Cucamonga Creek along Limonite Avenue with viewpoint plazas, cool down features, and substantial site amenities. Mark Thomas is also leading final design efforts closing the gap in the SCE regional trail system by constructing Class I paths and a new prefabricated pedestrian/bicycle bridge crossing the Cucamonga Creek. The project includes coordination with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to secure MS 404/408 approvals and the development of a CEQA-compliant environmental document for all project improvements. Original project concepts included a six-lane arterial facility with Class II bike lane facilities, however, Mark Thomas developed a design that reduced the roadway width and resulted in over $7M in savings to construction costs. The project is currently under construction and is anticipated to be fully constructed by August 2024. In addition to design services, Mark Thomas prepared the successful $9.5M LPP grant application for the project. We demonstrated how constructing the project reduces VMT and provides new multi-modal connections to jobs. We have also assisted the City in the management of LPP funds.

PROJECT RELEVANCE
Drainage Infrastructure
Grant Funding
Regulatory Approvals
HEACOCK STREET IMPROVEMENTS & SOUTH EXTENSION |

MORENO VALLEY

PROJECT RELEVANCE
Drainage Infrastructure Regulatory ApprovalsRight-of-Way Right-of-Way
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 14 ends

NUEVO ROAD WIDENING & BRIDGE REHABILITATION |

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

CLIENT CONTACT
Riverside County Transportation and Land
Management Agency (TLMA)
Umer Ahmed
(951) 955-1637
[email protected]

PROJECT DURATION
04/2021 - Current

KEY STAFF
Josh Cosper (PM)
Pat Somerville (PIC)
Kimberly Barling (Civil Engineer)
John McCarthy (Hydrology/Hydraulics)
Alahesh Thurairajah (Geotechnical)
Paul Herrmann (Traffic)
This project includes the rehabilitation and widening of the existing two-lane Nuevo Road Bridge. The proposed Nuevo Road Bridge will be widened to four-lanes with connecting approach roadways that will also be widened to accommodate the bridge widening. The existing Nuevo Road Bridge is approximately 254.6 feet long and 29’-10” wide. The bridge was originally built in 1956 and the County of Riverside and Caltrans have determined that there is a significant need for bridge improvements on the existing Nuevo Road Bridge over San Jacinto River. The bridge is listed in the Federal Eligible Bridge List (EBL) with a Sufficiency Rating (SR) of 73.2 according to the Bridge Inspection Report prepared by Caltrans. This bridge has been flagged Structurally Deficient (SD) and Functionally Obsolete (FO). Since the bridge has SR lower than 80, the bridge is eligible for major rehabilitation in accordance with the HBP guidelines. Mark Thomas is providing project approval/environmental documentation, PS&E, and construction bidding support for this project located in Riverside County, approximately 1.2 miles west of Lakeview Avenue. Specific scope of services includes bridge and roadway design, traffic studies, utility research and base mapping, obtaining encroachment permits, surveying and right-of-way mapping, geotechnical engineering, hydrology and hydraulics, and environmental studies and documentation. This is primarily funded by Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) Funds and will follow the process and procedures under Caltrans Office of Local Programs.

PALOMAR STREET COMPLETE STREETS | WILDOMAR

CLIENT CONTACT
City of Wildomar
Warren Repke, PE
(714) 336-6621
[email protected]

PROJECT DURATION
05/2021 - 04/2024

KEY STAFF
Josh Cosper (PM)
Kimberly Barling (Civil Engineer)
Mark Teague (NEPA/CEQA)
Paul Herrmann (Traffic)
This project included multi-modal improvements along Palomar Street and Gruwell Street through the City’s Old T own District and streetscape/ beautification improvements along the Wildomar Cemetery frontage. Mark Thomas has provided preliminary/final design services and streetscape planning services for this one mile segment. The project includes a Class I trail system and intersection safety improvements. The project also includes Class II buffered bike lanes, equestrian improvements, Riverside T ransit Agency bus facilities, and street and site amenities.

Mark Thomas led the development of a cross section and aesthetic theme to capture the vision of their Old T own District and the City’s recent Mobility Element as part of the preliminary design efforts. These efforts included a quantitative analysis in traffic and design features that resulted in minimizing impacts to multiple SCE T ransmission Poles along the west side of Palomar Street. This project was delivered on time and within budget.

PROJECT RELEVANCE

PROJECT RELEVANCE
Drainage Regulatory
Approvals
Drainage
Grant FundingRegulatory Approvals
Right-of-WayInfrastructure
Infrastructure
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 15 ends

OUR STELLER REPUTATION
The Mark Thomas team continues to provide a commitment to our clients with a high quality service and dedication to finish the project on time and within budget from start to finish. We have a reputation for being highly responsive, adaptable to the City’s needs and the project’s goals, and understand the importance of communication throughout our project. The references below will testify Mark Thomas’ excellent reputation on successfully delivering projects. “Josh and the Mark Thomas team are excellent to
work with. While managing our $27M gap closure
project to close the final gap of Limonite Avenue,
he was very responsive, pro-active in identifying
cost saving solutions, helped us navigate through a
complex permitting process, and strived to keep the
project on schedule. ”
Bryan Jones
City Manager
City of Eastvale
“Josh’s coordination for the Hermosa Avenue Storm
Drain Improvements and the Baristo Wash Channel
connection through Riverside County Flood Control
was impressive. No issues were encountered during
construction and overall, I was very satisfied with
his design and leadership on the project. ”
Savat Khamphou
Assistant Public Works Director
City of Corona

REFERENCE PROJECT
Savat Khamphou, PE
Public Works Director
City of Corona
400 S. Vicentia Avenue
Corona, CA 92882
(951) 279-3604
[email protected]
McKinley Grade Separation
Program management, utilities coordination, and drainage oversight for a grade separation and drainage improvements along McKinley Street crossing the BNSF Railroad. This project will grade separate McKinley Street over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) tracks south of SR 91. The project requires coordination and approvals from Caltrans, BNSF and the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). There is also coordination required with utility providers and Riverside County T ransportation Commission (RCTC) for Senate Bill 132 funding reimbursement.

Project Size: $142M
Jason Farag, PE
Director of Public Works
City of Wildomar
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 201
Wildomar CA 92595
(951) 677-7751 x219
[email protected]
Palomar Street Complete Streets Project
Planning, design, and construction support for complete streets improvements along Palomar Street and Gruwell Avenue in the City of Wildomar. The project includes multi-use and equestrian trail facilities, class II bicycle lanes, Riverside T ransit Agency bus facilities, and street and site amenities for the limits of Gruwell and Palomar Street.

When complete, this project will greatly enhance pedestrian mobility, bicycle safety, and the public’s access and use of the Wildomar Cemetery. Project Size: $3.03M Jimmy Chung, PE
City Engineer
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Avenue, Suite 910
Eastvale, CA 91752
(951) 703-4473
[email protected]
Limonite Avenue Gap Closure, Scholar Way and
Harrison Street ATP Cycle 4 Projects
Mark Thomas is currently providing planning, design, and construction support for both these projects for the City of Eastvale. Limonite Avenue Gap closure provides a new bridge structure over the Cucamonga Creek Channel closing the gap for this crucial east/west arterial road connector through Eastvale. Scholar Way and Harrison Street include over 4 miles of road diet improvements and a new Class IV bikeway.

Project Size(s): Limonite $20.1 mil, Scholar/Harrison $2.5 mil

4.3. PROPOSED STAFF/TEAM
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 16 ends

PROPOSED STAFF/TEAM

PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION
Our team consists of experts in their respective fields with extensive experience in roadway widening projects. Our Project Manager, Josh Cosper was the project manager responsible for the NEPA/CEQA environmental clearance, preliminary engineering, and final design of the phased roadway widening improvements for the City’s Heacock Street Widening project 11 years ago. We bring the City a comprehensive team with partnered firms the City are familiar with and bringing back team member(s) who have worked on the previous Heacock Street Improvements & South Extension project. Key Staff

PROJECT DIRECTOR
Pat Somerville, PE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

PROJECT MANAGER
Josh Cosper, PE, PLS, QSD

PROJECT STAFF

CIVIL/ROADWAY
Kimberly Barling, PE
Trisha Keith, PE *
Rachel Yazawa-Taylor, PE
Madison Hall, EIT

BICYCLES/PEDESTRIANS
Paul Martin, PE, TE, LCI
Aaron Silva, PE

CALTRANS COORDINATION
Paul Mittica, PE

FUNDING
Ryan Bissegger
Madison Hubert

STRUCTURES
Lynn Odgiiv, SE

HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS
John McCarthy, PE, CFM [Q3]
Remi Candaele, PE, MS, QSD, QISP *

DRAINAGE/WATER QUALITY
Ken Doty, PE
Tyler Hodges, PE

UTILITY COORDINATION
Narut Leehacharoenkul, PE
Alan Su, PE

RIGHT-OF-WAY COORDINATION
Dave Moritz, PLS
Ravi Shah, PE
SURVEY
Teri Kahlen, PLS
Byron Cazar, PLS

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
Jingwen Guo, PLA
Bryan Groves, PLA

SIGNAL/ELECTRICAL DESIGN
Ricky Chan, PE, TE, PTOE
Isaiah Kinder, EIT

GRAPHICS/RENDERINGS
Rick Spitz

NEPA/CEQA
Mark Teague, AICP
Malia Durand [PI] *

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS/LIGHTING
Paul Herrmann [F&P]

GEOTECHNICAL
Alahesh Thurairajah, PE, GE, BC.GE [EMI]

RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
Kim Bibolet,
SR/WA, R/W-NAC [MON]
QA/QC
Paul Mittica, PE *
Placeworks, Inc. [PI]
Q3 Consulting, Inc. [Q3]
Fehr & Peers, Inc. [F&P]
Earth Mechanics, Inc. [EMI]
Monument ROW [MON]
* Back Up Personnel
LEGEND
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 17 ends

MEET OUR KEY PERSONNEL
Provided below is a brief overview of our key personnel (who will remian in service until completion of the contract) qualifications. In the event our key personnel are not available, Mark Thomas have assigned back up personnel to lead the assigned tasks. Full resumes of our key and back up personnel can be found in our Appendices Section.

Josh Cosper, PE, PLS, QSD | Project Manager | Availability 65% » 20 years of experience as a successful project manager on numerous transportation infrastructure projects such as gap closures, highway/roadway widenings providing projects management, planning, and final design services. • Was the project manager who provided NEPA/CEQA environmental clearance, preliminary engineering, and final design for the Heacock Street Improvements & South Extension 11 years ago.
• The current project manager for the City of Eastvale’s Limonite Avenue Gap Closure, and Riverside County’s Nuevo Road Widening & Bridge Rehabilitation.

Pat Somerville, PE | Project Director | Availability 55% » 38 years of experience in civil engineering and management with a focus on municipal transportation and other complex capital improvement projects. • Extensive experience in transportation infrastructure widening projects, such as City of Orange’s Cannon Street Widening, City of Norwalk’s Firestone Boulevard Widening and many more.
• Was involved in the Orange County’s OC Loop Segments O, P, and Q project, bridging 2.7-mile gap in existing Coyote Creek Bikeway.

Kimberly Barling, PE | Civil/Roadway Lead | Availability 70% » 10 years of experience in roadway realignment, local roadway widening, grade separations, street beautification, and complete streets enhancements. • An expert in minimizing utility and right-of-way impacts by staying involved in the utility coordination process and coordinating with other disciplines and property owners. • Worked with the project manager on the City of Wildomar Palomar Street Widening project as the project engineer.

Mark Teague, AICP | NEPA/CEQA Lead | Availability 60% [PI] » 35 years of providing environmental services to public and private sector agencies all throughout California.
• Online CEQA training instructor at University of California, San Diego and Imperial County.
• Worked with Mark Thomas on the City of Corona’s Ontario Avenue Widening project providing CEQA documentation for the project.

John McCarthy, PE, CFM | Hydrology/Hydraulics Lead | Availability 60% [Q3] » 36 years of experience in the development, design, and construction of flood control and drainage improvements for transportation and public works projects. • Experience is concentrated in the field of stormwater management, including hydrology studies, detailed hydraulic analyses, floodplain managements, and improvement plan preparation.
• Provided drainage management for the City of T emecula Cherry Street Extension project, a proposed extension project of Cherry Street. 2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 18 ends

SUBCONSULTANTS
In order to provide comprehensive services, we have selected trusted subconsultants to help us deliver this project for the City. We selected our team based on our ongoing working relationship and previous track record of success with them on similar types of projects. All our subconsultants have excellent reputations and are extremely competent and qualified in their areas of expertise.

GEOTECHNICAL | Earth Mechanics, Inc. [EMI] has planned, coordinated, and conducted geotechnical field investigations for numerous local, regional and state funded projects that included pavement condition survey, pavement rehabilitation, design and construction recommendations for rigid and flexible pavement sections. With a long standing working relationship between our firms, having worked together on the City of Eastvale Limonite Gap Closure and Counties of Riverside and Perris I-215/ Knox Boulevard Interchange projects and their extensive experience working with the City, EMI is the perfect partner to provide geotechnical services for the City on this road extension project.

Project Experience:
• City of Moreno Valley, SR-60/Moreno Beach Drive Interchange • City of Moreno Valley, SR-60/Nason Street Interchange • City of Moreno Valley, SR-60/Graham Street Overcrossing • City of Moreno Valley, Indian Street/Cardinal Avenue Interchange TRAFFIC ANALYSIS | Fehr & Peers, Inc. [F&P] is another familiar firm to the City, who has provided their traffic analysis and engineering services to the City on various projects, such as the General Plan Update & EIR and Aquabella Specific Plan TIA.

Providing their expertise in traffic signals, traffic forecasting and operations analysis, F&P have worked extensively with Mark Thomas over the years. F&P is currently working with us on the Riverside County’s Nuevo Road Widening & Bridge Rehabilitation project providing traffic forecasting and operations analysis, VMT forecasting & impact analysis for the project.

Project Experience:
• City of Perris, I-215 Harley Knox Boulevard Interchange PA/ED • Riverside County, Nuevo Road Widening & Bridge Rehabilitation • City of Menifee, Valley Boulevard Widening
• City of Murrieta, Kaiser Signal Design PS&E
RIGHT-OF-WAY SUPPORT | Monument ROW [MON] has been part of the Southern California business landscape for more than 25 years delivering right-of-way services on hundreds of transportation projects. Their portfolio of projects includes a variety of capital improvement projects for cities, counties, transportation agencies and municipalities, with an emphasis on projects involving state and federal funding that require compliance with the Caltrans Right-of-Way Manual and FHWA procedures. They have significant experience delivering large programs. They have the ability to shift quickly, be flexible, innovative, and highly collaborative.

Project Experience:
• City of Santa Ana, Bristol Street Widening, Phases 3A, 3B, and 4 • City of Santa Ana, Warner Avenue Widening, Phases 1 and 2 • City of Yorba Linda, Bastanchury Widening
• OCTA, SR-55 Improvements
NEPA/CEQA | Placeworks, Inc. [PI] has completed thousands of environmental documents and risk analyses — from CEQA/NEPA documentation, environmental site investigations and remediation, and health risk assessments to landscape architecture and transportation and bicycle plans. The firm stays current with ever-changing state requirements, amendments to these requirements, and court interpretations so we can navigate the complexities of environmental planning, avoid pitfalls, and expedite approvals in a cost-efficient manner.

Project Experience:
• City of Moreno Valley, CEQA Peer Reviews of EIR
• City of Corona, Ontario Avenue Widening
• City of Corona, General Plan EIR
• City of Wildomar, Palomar Road Widening & Realignment HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS | Q3 Consulting, Inc. [Q3] is a specialized stormwater management firm with an extensive background in the planning, analysis, and design of comprehensive flood management and drainage solutions for transportation and public works projects.

Q3 has extensive experience working in Moreno Valley on projects with the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) and is currently working with RCFC&WCD on the design of Moreno Master Plan of Drainage (MDP) Line F near Redlands Boulevard. Q3 team members also have extensive experience and knowledge of the regional drainage facilities in the Moreno Valley area having also worked on the designs for Line B at the MAFB and the drainage master plan update for the Oleander Specific Plan area.

Project Experience:
• RCTD, Nuevo Road Widening
• City of Chino, Pine Street Widening
• City of T emecula, Cherry Street Extension
• OCTA, SR-91 Widening

4.4. REQUIRED STATEMENTS
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 19 ends

A. Statement that this RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of the Consultant's Proposal.

Mark Thomas acknowledges that this RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of our proposal.

Mark Thomas acknowledges that this RFP and our proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for this project when said agreement is fully executed by Mark Thomas and the Mayor or City Manager of Moreno Valley.

C. A statement that the Consultant’s Services to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City's RFP except as otherwise specified in the Consultant's Proposal under the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL."
Mark Thomas acknowledges that our Services to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City’s RFP except as otherwise specified in Mark Thomas’ Proposal under the heading “ ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY’S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL. ”
D. A single and separate section with the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" (if needed) containing a complete and detailed description of all of the exceptions to the provisions and conditions of this Request for Proposal upon which the Consultant’s Proposal is contingent and which shall take precedent over this RFP .

Mark Thomas has included a separate section with the heading “ ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY’S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL” (in the appendices) containing a complete and detailed description of all of the exceptions to the provisions and conditions of this Request for Proposal upon which Mark Thomas’ Proposal is contingent and which shall take precedent over this RFP .

E. A statement of qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the Consultant’s Staff to be assigned to this project, a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact. If one or more of the Consultant’s staff should become unavailable, the Consultant may substitute other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City.

Mark Thomas has submitted qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of our staff to be assigned to this project, a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact have also been included. We understand that if one or more of our staff should become unavailable, we may substitute other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City.

F. A resource allocation matrix must be submitted with the Proposal. The resource allocation matrix must list detailed tasks in rows and the appropriate individual (Job Title Only) as well as the number of hours that these individuals will be working on each task listed, will be included in adjacent columns. The resource allocation matrix and the project design schedule are required of both the primary consultant, as well as any sub-consultant. In addition, the applicable construction support services consultant must list the type and number or hours of geotechnical tests being proposed, as well as the type and number of hours of inspection or survey work within the Proposal. Failure to do so will result in the Consultant’s Proposal being deemed incomplete and it will not receive further consideration. The construction support services Consultant is not required to provide a Project Schedule with milestones.

Upon award of a specific project/task order, Mark Thomas will provide the City with a Resource Allocation Matrix. The resource allocation matrix will list detailed tasks in rows and the appropriate individual (Job Title Only) as well as the number of hours that these individuals will be working on each task listed, will be included in adjacent columns. Mark Thomas understands that the resource allocation matrix and the project design schedule are required of both the primary consultant, as well as any sub-consultant. In addition, the applicable construction support services consultant must list the type and number or hours of geotechnical tests being proposed, as well as the type and number of hours of inspection or survey work within the Proposal. We understand that failure to do so will result in our Proposal being deemed incomplete and it will not receive further consideration.

The construction support services Consultant is not required to provide a Project Schedule with milestones.

G. A statement of sub-consultant’s (include relief personnel) qualifications applicable to this project including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the sub-consultant’s staff to be assigned to this project, a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact.

Mark Thomas has included the qualifications of our subconsultants including the names, qualifications and proposed duties of the sub-consultant’s staff to be assigned to this project, a listing of recent similar projects completed including the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact. Resumes and references for our subconsultants can be found in the appendices.

REQUIRED STATEMENTS
2024-008 HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 8010010) City of Moreno Valley

MARK THOMAS

Page 20 ends

H. A statement that the Consultant acknowledges and understands that the Consultant will not be allowed to change the sub-consultant without written permission from the City.

Mark Thomas acknowledges and understands that the we will not be allowed to change the sub-consultant without written permission from the City.

Mark Thomas acknowledges that when awarded a specific project/task order, all charges for Consultant (construction) services is a “Not-to-Exceed Fee” which must include conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made a part of said Consultant’s Proposal.

When awarded a specific project/task order, Mark Thomas will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This may include preparation of field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement objectives.

K. A statement that the Consultant will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the construction work.

Mark Thomas will immediately document and notify the City of any defects or hazardous conditions observed in the vicinity of the project site prior, during, or after the construction work.

L. A copy of the Consultant's hourly rate schedule and a statement that said hourly rate schedule is part of the Consultant's Proposal for use in invoicing for progress payments and for extra work incurred that is not part of this RFP . An itemized cost breakdown for the work described herein must be submitted in a separate file, entitled Cost file, as part of the Consultant’s Proposal submittal. All extra work will require prior approval from the City.

Mark Thomas has included our hourly rate schedule. Our hourly rate schedule is part of our Proposal (uploaded separately) for use in invoicing for progress payments and for extra work incurred that is not part of this RFP . An itemized cost breakdown for the work described herein must be submitted in a separate file, entitled Cost file, as part of Mark Thomas’ Proposal submittal. All extra work will require prior approval from the City.

M. A statement that the Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Mark Thomas will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

All federal laws and regulations will be adhered to notwithstanding any state or local laws and regulations. In a case of conflict between federal, state or local laws or regulations the strictest will be adhered to.

All relevant records shall be retained for at least three years.

Mark Thomas will allow all authorized federal, state, county, and City officials access to place of work, books, documents, papers, fiscal, payroll, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this special project. All relevant records will be retained for at least three years.

P. A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC 276-a through a-7), and the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto (29 CFR Section 1, 5), any amendments thereof and the California Labor Code. Pursuant to the said regulations, entitled “Federal Labor Standards Provisions, ” Federal Prevailing Wage Decision” and State of California prevailing wage rates, respectively.

Mark Thomas will comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC 276-a through a-7), and the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto (29 CFR Section 1, 5), any amendments thereof and the California Labor Code. Pursuant to the said regulations, entitled “Federal Labor Standards Provisions, ” Federal Prevailing Wage Decision” and State of California prevailing wage rates, respectively.

Q. A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 USC 874) and the Implementation Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any amendments thereof.

Mark Thomas will comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 USC 874) and the Implementation Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any amendments thereof
R. A statement that the Consultant offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Consultant, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

Mark Thomas offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the subcontract.

This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Consultant, without further acknowledgment by the parties.

APPENDICES

REQUIRED FORMS
A. ATTACHMENT C - NON-COLLUSION DECLARATION
Non-Collusion Declaration
Note: To be executed by Proposer and submitted with proposal.

State of
(the State of the place of business)
County of
(the County of the place of business)
, being first duly sworn, deposes and
(name of the person signing this form)
says that he/she is of
(title of the person signing this form)
,
(name of bidding company)
the party making the foregoing bid. The bid is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnershi p, company, association, organization, or corporation. The bid is genuine and not collusive or sham. The bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid. The bidder has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or to refrain from bidding. The bidder has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of the bidder or any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the bid price, or of that of any other bidder. All statements contained in the bid are true. The bidder has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, to effectuate a collusive or sham bid, and has not paid, and will not pay, any person or entity for such purpose.

Any person executing this declaration on behalf of a bidder that is a corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, or any other entity, hereby represents that he or she has full power to execute, and does execute, this declaration on behalf of the bidder.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration is executed on ___[date], at ___[city], ___[state].”
By:
(signature)
Printed Name:
(name of the person signing this form)
Title:
(title of the person signing this form)
California
Orange
Pat Somerville, PE
Associate Principal-in-Charge
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Kelsey Proper
05/20/2024

XXXXXXXX
Fort Lauderale, Florida.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Notarized remotely online using communication technology via Proof.

Associate Principal-in-Charge
Drivers License produced for ID.

B. ATTACHMENT E - EXHIBIT 10-O1 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL

DBE COMMITMENT
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O1
Consultant Proposal DBE Commitment
EXHIBIT 10-O1 CONSULTANT PROPOSAL DBE COMMITMENT

1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal:

3. Project Description:

4. Project Location:

5. Consultant's Name: 6. Prime Certified DBE: 

7. Description of Work, Service, or Materials
Supplied

8. DBE
Certification
Number
Local Agency to Complete this Section

17. Local Agency Contract Number:

18. Federal-Aid Project Number:

19. Proposed Contract Execution Date:

20. 21. Local Agency Representative's Signature 22. Date

23. Local Agency Representative's Name 24. Phone

25. Local Agency Representative's Title
Consultant’s Ranking after Evaluation: __________________________ Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate.

9. DBE Contact Information

11. TOTAL CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION

10. DBE %
%
IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required.

12. Preparer's Signature 13. Date

14. Preparer's Name 15. Phone

16. Preparer's Title
DISTRIBUTION: Original – Included with consultant’s proposal to local agency.

ADA Notice: For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

LPP 18-01 Page 1 of 2
January 2019
Reset Form
HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION (CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010) TBDCity of Moreno Valley
Moreno Valley
Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Geotechnical
Right-of-Way
6956
46456
Alahesh Thurairajah, 765 North Main St,
STE 136, Corona, CA 92880, (951) 333-3648
Robert Morrison, 200 Spectrum Center,
STE 300, Irvine, CA 92618, (800) 577-0109
05/22/2024
(714) 815-5222Pat Somerville, PE
Associate Principal
TBD
TBD
C. ATTACHMENT F - EXHIBIT 10-Q DISC LOSURE OF
LOBBYING ACTIVITIESLocal Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
EXHIBIT 10-Q D ISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post -award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

10. Name and Address of Lobby Entity 11. Individuals Performing Services (If individual, last name, first name, MI) (including address if different from No. 10) (last name, first name, MI)
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in -kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________

15. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be performed and Date(s) of Service, including officer(s), employee(s), or member(s) contacted, for Payment Indicated in Item 12:
(attach Continuation Sheet(s) if necessary)

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Signature: ________________________________________
Print Name: _______________________________________
Title: ____________________________________________
Telephone No.: ____________________ Date:___________
Authorized for Local Reproduction
Federal Use Only: Standard Form - LLL
Standard Form LLL Rev. 04-28-06
Distribution: Orig- Local Agency Project Files

Page 1 ends

LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013
Pat Somerville, PE
Associate Principal
(714) 815-5222 5/27/24
Not Applicable to Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.
/RFDO$VVLVWDQFH3URFHGXUHV0DQXDO (;+%,74
'LVFORVXUHRI/REE\LQJ$FWLYLWLHV
(;+,%,74 ',6&/2685(2)/2%%<,1*$&7,9,7,(6
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial
b. grant b. initial award b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For Material Change Only:
e. loan guarantee year ____ quarter _________
f. loan insurance date of last report __________

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

13. Form of Payment (check all that apply): c. commission a. cash d. contingent fee
b. in-kind; specify: nature _______________ e deferred
Value _____________ f. other, specify _________________________

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

17. Information requested through this form is authorized by Title 31 U.S.C. Section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying reliance was placed by the tier above when his transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352
. This information will be reported to Congress
semiannually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

Page 1 ends

/33 0D\
127$33/,&$%/()25($57+0(&+$1,&6,1&
✔ ✔ ✔
1st
Alahesh Thurairajah, PE, GE, BC. GE
Principal
714-751-3826 5/13/24
✔
✔
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
EXHIBIT 10-Q D ISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

Page 1 ends

LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013
Jason Pack
Principal
9493086300 5/14/24
NOT APPLICABLE FOR FEHR & PEERS, INC.

Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
EXHIBIT 10-Q D ISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

Page 1 ends

LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013
Not Applicable
Amber Costello
President
562.260.0507 5/13/24
/uni2714

NOT APPLICABLE TO MONUMENT ROW
Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHBIT 10-Q
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
EXHIBIT 10-Q D ISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
COMPLETE THIS FORM TO DISCLOSE LOBBYING ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO 31 U.S.C. 1352

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

Page 1 ends

LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013
Pamela Fahy
Marketing/Business Development Manager
714-966-9220 5/22/24
PF
Digitally signed by PF
Date: 2024.05.22 09:20:37 -07'00'
NOT APPLICABLE TO PLACEWORKS, INC.

4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name and Address of Prime:

Prime Subawardee
Tier _______ , if known
Congressional District, if known Congressional District, if known

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:

CFDA Number, if applicable ____________________

8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:

12. Amount of Payment (check all that apply) 14. Type of Payment (check all that apply) $ _____________ actual planned a. retainer
b. one -time fee

16. Continuation Sheet(s) attached: Yes No

Page 1 ends

LPP 13-01 May 8, 2013
Not Applicable for Q3 Consulting, Inc.
/uni2714 /uni2714 /uni2714
John McCarthy
Vice President
949-259-6730 5/27/24
/uni2714

RESUMES

JOSH COSPER, PE, PLS, QSD

PROJECT MANAGER

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #C71667 | CA PLS #8774 |CA QSD #00709
Josh is a successful project manager on numerous transportation and roadway corridor improvement projects providing project management, planning, and final design services. He has led over 50 miles of transportation corridor improvements throughout the Inland Empire and Coachella Valley over the last 10 years. He is the ideal project manager for this project as Josh provided support on the previous efforts for this project in the conceptual development, including experienced in providing coordination with major project stakeholders such as MARB, March JPA, and the City of Perris.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

HEACOCK STREET IMPROVEMENTS & SOUTH

EXTENSION, MORENO VALLEY
Project manager responsible for the NEPA/CEQA
environmental clearance, preliminary engineering and final design of phased roadway widening improvements (two
lanes to six lanes) from Harley Knox Boulevard to Cactus Avenue (3.6 miles) over two phases of projects. Josh was also responsible for utility coordination/relocation planning, development of a conceptual multi-lane roundabout,
bridge modifications, and the design of approximately 1000 lf of RCFC & WCD regional storm drain facilities.

LIMONITE AVENUE GAP CLOSURE, EASTVALE
Project manager responsible for the preparation of
roadway and bridge widening improvements to a one
mile segment of Limonite Avenue from Hellman Avenue
in the City of Chino to Archibald Avenue. Project includes coordination with numerous high profile developers,
regulatory permits, development of a multi-lane
roundabout, a three span bridge structure, and assistance to the City in adoption of project specific design and safety standards. Josh was responsible for identifying an
alternative design that reduced approximately 100 feet
less of the bridge length saving the City nearly $5M.

NUEVO ROAD WIDENING & BRIDGE REHABILITATION,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Project manager for the replacement of the existing
Nuevo Road Bridge over San Jacinto River. The existing
two-lane bridge will be replaced with a four-lane structure accommodating the future build out of Nuevo Road. The
approach roadway will taper from the new wider structure to the existing two-lane roadway. Responsibilities include managing preliminary engineering, life cycle cost analysis for structure widening versus replacement, final roadway and bridge design, environmental clearance, hydraulic
analysis, geotechnical investigation, permitting, and right- of-way acquisition. Primarily funded by HBP funds, the
project will follow the process and procedures under the Caltrans Office of Local Programs.

PALOMAR STREET WIDENING, WILDOMAR
Project manager for the final design and streetscape
planning services being provided. The project includes over one mile of Palomar Street and Gruwell Street through the Old T own District of Wildomar perimeter walls, decorative landscape and hardscape, multi-use and equestrian trail facilities, Class II bicycle lanes, as well as bus facilities to accommodate all modes of travel but also maintaining the aesthetic theme of Old T own.

HAMNER AVENUE WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS,
NORCO
Project manager responsible for preliminary engineering, environmental clearance and final design for the
construction of urban arterial roadway and storm drain
improvements to Hamner Avenue. Project also included
the design of an extension to an existing 72-inch diameter RCP storm drain and the installation of a prefabricated steel arch tunnel structure. Josh was also responsible the design of approximately 2,000 LF of a 20-inch water transmission line relocation, 5,000 LF of a 30-inch water transmission line relocation and coordination with Southern California Edison to relocate 10 electric transmission/ distribution poles.

RESUMES

PAUL MITTICA, PE*

CALTRANS COORDINATION

EDUCATION
BS in Civil Engineering

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #C84987
Paul has more than 23 years of experience ranging from large complex Caltrans state highway projects to working on public works civil and traffic projects in the Inland Empire. He has developed engineering and geometrics for 30 intersections, 10 interchanges, and more than 40 miles of freeway improvements, including the I-15 and I-80 corridors in Utah. He has recently focused his efforts to integrate and navigate projects through the environmental, planning and final design processes with many years of relevant work and relationships throughout the IE and Caltrans District 8. Paul is hands-on with every aspect of a project that lead to streamlined reviews and approvals with local civil and transportation projects.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

CHERRY STREET EXTENSION, TEMECULA
Project manager responsible for the design of roadway
extension and the Murrieta Creek crossing for the City
of T emecula. The project will provide an interim roadway connection from the existing Cherry Street to the proposed new intersection, requiring a crossing over the Murrieta Creek. Cherry Street will ultimately serve as divided four lane arterial roadway facility that provides connectivity from Diaz Road to French Valley Parkway for the cities of Murrieta and T emecula residents. Extensive coordination with RCFC & WCD, RCWD, and RCA.

MADISON STREET WIDENING, INDIO
Project manager responsible for the environmental
approval and final design for improvements to Madison
Street from Highway 111 to Avenue 48 to relieve traffic congestion and improve safety for all modes of travel.

The project will reconfigure Madison Street to include two lanes in each direction from Highway 111 to Avenue 48
and will include the design of a center median with a left turn lane, new connected bike lanes, and new curb, gutter and sidewalk. At the Highway 111 intersection, Madison
Street will be improved to accommodate northbound and
southbound right turn.

BREA CANYON ROAD WIDENING, ORANGE COUNTY
Senior project engineer responsible for the design to
widen nearly two miles of Brea Canyon Boulevard from
Canyondale Drive to the Orange County/LA County
boundary line. The project improvements include widening the existing undivided two-lane roadway to a four-lane
divided roadway, replacing the three existing bridges
over the Brea Canyon Channel, rehabilitating the existing channel, construction permanent retaining walls up to 65 feet high, and replacing the traffic signal at Canyon County Road. The project involves complex construction staging to keep the roadway in operation during construction, as it is a reliever route for SR-57.

CALEXICO BRIDGE WIDENING, CALEXICO
Design manager responsible for overseeing design
services and final deliverables, including ensuring that scope, schedule, and budget are maintained. Under
Paul’s leadership, the design team delivered Release for Construction Plans in 10 months, ahead of schedule. Paul represents the Mark Thomas team, serving as Engineer
of Record in a subconsultant role to Hazard Construction.

ICTC, FHWA, and Caltrans along with the U.S. General
Services Administration (GSA) propose to widen the
existing Calexico East Port of Entry Bridge over the All- American Canal near the US/ Mexico border to improve
access to the existing inspection booths. Mark Thomas’s responsibilities included all civil components of the project including roadway widening for 2 additional commercial
vehicle lanes and 3 additional pass vehicle lanes NB from Mexico to the Border Patrol Facility, bridge widening, box culvert extensions, drainage improvements, water quality treatment, electrical, and constructing a pedestrian foot path that connects Mexico to Border Patrol Facilities to allow safe passage across the border.

I-215/HARLEY KNOX INTERCHANGE, PERRIS
Project manager for the PA/ED for improvements that will serve as an important mitigation measure in response to the increased traffic congestion, improve goods movement for existing and future industrial developments in the
region, and provide a more efficient access to the freeway as well as east-west connectivity over I-215 within the City of Perris and communities beyond. The new interchange
will be able to better accommodate the increased traffic and will also align with complete streets principles, allowing for a better flow for all modes of travel.
[*] - Assistant Project Manager as Necessary

PAT SOMERVILLE, PE

PROJECT DIRECTOR

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Long Beach

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #C56141
Pat has more than 38 years of experience in civil engineering and management with a focus on municipal transportation and other complex capital improvement projects. He brings proven consensus building skills. He is adept at public presentations at City Council, Commission or community outreach meetings. He actively engages third parties, including regulatory agencies, utility companies, Class I and commuter rail and CPUC, coordinating early and often through the project life cycle. These relationships and this approach will lead to project approvals and on-time project delivery.

His career also includes 12 years working in the public sector, which provides him with a detailed understanding of governmental and agency processes, project finance and needs analysis, as well as the technical and contractual requirements for the design and construction of civil projects.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

CAMPUS AVENUE AT-GRADE RAILWAY CROSSING

SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS, ONTARIO
Project manager for the preliminary engineering,
environmental clearance and PS&E for the modifications
to this at-grade crossing. Work includes the installation of a new traffic signal at the adjacent cross-street, curb return, median and pedestrian improvements, and layout
of new rail crossing safety equipment, including exit gates and cantilever signals. Project is CPUC Section 130 funded.

Coordination with CPUC, including the GO-88B, UPRR,
Metrolink and Caltrans Division of Rail is being provided.

YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING AND

SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING PROJECTS,

YORBA LINDA
Project manager providing final design services for the widening of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Savi Ranch
Parkway that includes the bridge widening over the Santa Ana River. Scope of work includes PS&E for both as well as leading the efforts on regulatory permitting processes.

Was the lead civil engineer who delivered the previous two phases that the final design will be based off of which is the Savi Ranch Mobility Feasibility Study and Project Report & Environmental Document (PR/ED).

SAN FERNANDO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, GLENDALE
Project manager for the City of Glendale’s PS&E project located on San Fernando Road between Elk Avenue
and the northerly limit of the City of Glendale at Spazier Avenue. Scope of work includes rehabilitation of existing pavement and hardscape, include bicycle facilities,
modifications to bus stop locations from near-side to
far-side intersections, add raised medians and street
beautification features south of Grandview, and include sewer repair north of the Grandview Avenue intersection.

This project is a part of the Citywide capital improvement projects (CIP), which contains 365 miles of streets and alleys. The City is investing approximately $457M in its paved roadway network.

CANNON STREET WIDENING, ORANGE
Project manager responsible for the structure design,
hydraulic analysis, geotechnical investigation and
environmental clearance, and permitting for the widening of Cannon Street between Santiago Canyon Road and
Serrano Avenue. This vital project will address the heavy regional traffic during the afternoon peak hours that
are bypassing congestion on adjacent freeways. In the
southbound direction, pedestrian and bicycle traffic will be pulled off Cannon Street and directed onto a new
prefabricated bridge spanning over Santiago Creek.

BREA CANYON ROAD WIDENING, ORANGE COUNTY
Project manager providing the PS&E, geometric design
and retaining wall and bridge design for the widening
of nearly two miles of Brea Canyon Boulevard from
Canyondale Drive to the Orange County/LA County
boundary line, and the replacement of three bridges.

The project improvements include widening the existing
undivided two-lane roadway to a four-lane divided
roadway, replacing the three existing bridges over the
Brea Canyon Channel, rehabilitating the existing channel, constructing permanent retaining walls up to 65-feet-high, and replacing the traffic signal at Canyon Country Road.

KIMBERLY BARLING, PE

CIVIL/ROADWAY LEAD

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #C92279
Our civil lead has extensive experience in providing her engineering expertise on roadway realignment, roadway widening, grade separation, street beautification, and complete street enhancement projects. Kimberly is well versed in minimizing right-of-way impacts by being involved in the utility coordination process and coordinating with other project stakeholders.

She was the project engineer on the City Wildomar Palomar Street Widening and City of Norwalk Firestone Boulevard Widening projects, and the design engineer on the City of Eastvale Limonite Avenue Gap Closure project.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

PALOMAR STREET WIDENING, WILDOMAR
Project engineer for the final design and streetscape
planning services being provided. The project includes over one mile of Palomar Street and Gruwell Street through the Old T own District of Wildomar perimeter walls, decorative landscape and hardscape, multi-use and equestrian trail facilities, Class II bicycle lanes, as well as bus facilities to accommodate all modes of travel but also maintaining the aesthetic theme of Old T own.

LIMONITE AVENUE GAP CLOSURE, EASTVALE
Design engineer prior to joining the firm who developed retaining walls, pedestrian plazas and flood control access road. In addition, she also assisted with construction detail plans. This project extended Limonite Avenue from its
current terminus at Archibald Avenue to Hellman Avenue.

The gap closure constructed a divided four-lane facility with 11-foot travel lanes. The project extended bicycle and pedestrian facilities with the construction of 12-foot Class 1 paths on both sides of the roadway. This project also constructed a 320-foot bridge over Cucamonga Creek
Channel. A roundabout was constructed at driveway
entrances. The gap closure provided a regional east-west connection from SR-71 to I-15.

FIRESTONE BOULEVARD WIDENING, NORWALK
Project engineer providing support for the development
of the drainage plans, green streets report, Engineer’s cost estimate, and specifications. This roadway improvement
project that will widen Firestone Boulevard to six lanes from Hoxie Avenue to Imperial Highway to accommodate the
existing and projected traffic volumes. Phase 1 consists of two lanes in each direction with 10-foot sidewalks, on-street parking, and a variable width median within a right-of- way of 110 feet. This phase will be widened to six lanes as well as maintain on-street parking, sidewalks, and adding bicycle facilities.

MCKINLEY STREET GRADE SEPARATION, CORONA
Project engineer for the McKinley Street Grade Separation Project in the City of Corona. Services include overseeing the progress of the project, coordinating between various agencies, utility companies and other key stakeholders, pursuing and securing additional funding sources, and
identifying grant opportunities and preparing grant
applications. We are also coordinating with the City and design consultant to complete right-of-way certification and utilities relocation.

SAN FERNANDO ROAD IMPROVEMENTS, GLENDALE
Project engineer for the City of Glendale’s PS&E project located on San Fernando Road between Elk Avenue
and the northerly limit of the City of Glendale at Spazier Avenue. Scope of work includes rehabilitation of existing pavement and hardscape, include bicycle facilities,
modifications to bus stop locations from near-side to
far-side intersections, add raised medians and street
beautification features south of Grandview, and include sewer repair north of the Grandview Avenue intersection.

This project is a part of the Citywide Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), which contains 365 miles of streets and alleys. The City is investing approximately $457M in its paved roadway network.

TRISHA KEITH, PE *

CIVIL/ROADWAY

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #62490
T risha has 26 years of experience as a technical lead and project engineer for local roadway, highway, active transportation, and bicycle and pedestrian facility improvement projects, including Caltrans facilities. Her expertise ranges from preparing preliminary studies to developing the final construction plans, specifications, and cost estimates for roadway projects. She has a strong working knowledge of Caltrans standards, and has led teams in the development of multiple project initiation and project approval documents.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

BREA CANYON ROAD WIDENING, ORANGE COUNTY
T echnical lead engineer responsible for preparing technical specifications and providing technical design guidance for the widening of nearly 2 miles of Brea Canyon Boulevard from Canyondale Drive to the Orange County/LA County
boundary line. The project improvements include widening the existing undivided two-lane roadway to a four-lane
divided roadway, replacing the three existing bridges over the Brea Canyon Channel, rehabilitating the existing channel, constructing permanent retaining walls up to 65 feet high, and replacing the traffic signal at Canyon Country Road.

I-215/HARLEY KNOX INTERCHANGE, PERRIS
Project engineer for PA/ED for improvements that will
serve as an important mitigation measure in response to the increased traffic congestion, improve goods movement for existing and future industrial developments in the
region, and provide a more efficient access to the freeway as well as east-west connectivity over I-215 within the City of Perris and communities beyond. The new interchange
will be able to better accommodate the increased traffic and will also align with complete streets principles, allowing for a better flow for all modes of travel.

CULVER DRIVE REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING,
IRVINE
Project engineer responsible for geometric design and
details, traffic striping, and estimates for final plans, specifications and estimates for improvements to Culver Drive from Campus Drive to Bonita Canyon Drive in Irvine, California. Proposed improvements included roadway
widening, signal improvements, a meandering Class I
bicycle trail, water quality improvements, and noise barriers along adjacent residential development.

FOOTHILL PARKWAY WESTERLY EXTENSION, CORONA
Project engineer responsible for preliminary design, final design, and construction support of a two-mile extension of Foothill Parkway, from approximately 250 feet west of T rudy Way to Green River Road. The extension included
a new four-lane roadway, three local street connections and widenings, bridges, retaining walls, modification of an existing dam, major storm drain facilities, utilities, a multi- purpose trail, and trailhead parking.

UNIVERSITY DRIVE WIDENING, IRVINE
Project engineer responsible for preliminary design of
proposed improvements to University Drive between
MacArthrur Boulevard and Campus Drive. Proposed
improvements would widen the roadway from a four-
to six-lane arterial, provide new sidewalk to improve
pedestrian access to UC Irvine and San Diego Creek T rail, improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, construct
retaining walls, and provide water quality treatment.

CROWN VALLEY PARKWAY WIDENING,

LAGUNA NIGUEL
Engineer responsible for design and evaluation of roadway improvement concepts, trail continuity, widening impacts, and traffic striping for preliminary design improvements on Crown Valley Parkway between Greenfield Drive and Cabot Road.

I-205/I-580/ INTERNATIONAL PARKWAY

INTERCHANGES, TRACY
Project engineer responsible for the PA&ED phase of the Mountain House Interchange projects at I-580 and I-205.

These projects will reduce congestion, increase capacity and improve local circulation and functionality at both interchanges to accommodate increased traffic volumes
due to the 450 acre Cordes Ranch project. The I-580
interchange preferred alternative is a DDI.
[*] - Civil/Roadway Lead as Necessary

MARK T EAGUE, AICP

CEQA/NEPA LEAD

EDUCATION
BA, Political Science, California State University, Stanislaus

REGISTRATION
American Institute of Certified Planner (AICP) #019631
Mark T eague, with over 35 years of experience, has been providing CEQA/NEPA clearance support on transportation infrastructure projects for public agencies throughout the state of California. He worked with our project manager on the Heacock Street Improvements & South Extension project for the City in 2013, outlining a comprehensive approach to CEQA/NEPA clearance for the project, and will continue to provide his environmental clearance expertise on this project, leveraging his project knowledge with the City of Moreno Valley to continue to find efficiencies throughout delivery. Mark has worked with Mark Thomas on numerous projects throughout the years, such as the City of Corona Ontario Avenue Widening and the City of Wildomar Palomar Street Complete Streets projects. There will be no learning curve working with the Mark Thomas T eam.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

HEACOCK STREET IMPROVEMENTS & SOUTH

EXTENSION, MORENO VALLEY
Environmental lead responsible for the NEPA/CEQA
environmental clearance, for the proposed phased
roadway widening improvements (two-lanes to six-lanes)
project from Harley Knox Boulevard to Cactus Avenue (3.6 miles) over two phases of projects.

ONTARIO AVENUE WIDENING, CORONA
Environmental lead providing environmental support for
the improvements and widening of Ontario Avenue from
Lincoln Avenue to Conejo Street in the City of Corona.

Enhancements include widening of one lane vehicular
travel in each direction with improved bicycle & pedestrian accommodations, raised median, roadway lighting,
improved property access & installed driveways, signal
installations/modifications, utility relocations/horizontal setbacks, sewer laterals, drainage improvements, corridor continuity, and other mitigation measures to address local residents’ concerns. These improvements will ultimately provide three lanes of vehicular travel in each direction and a Class II Bikeway in the eastbound direction, while preserving the surrounding environment.

PALOMAR STREET COMPLETE STREETS, WILDOMAR
Environmental lead providing environmental support for the final design and streetscape planning services being provided.

The project includes over one mile of Palomar Street and Gruwell Street through the Old T own District of Wildomar perimeter walls, decorative landscape and hardscape, multi- use and equestrian trail facilities, Class II bicycle lanes, as well as bus facilities to accommodate all modes of travel but also maintaining the aesthetic theme of Old T own.

CLINTON KEITH ROAD WIDENING (PHASE 1),

WILDOMAR
Environmental lead providing environmental support for
the Clinton Keith Road Widening project for the first phase of a two-phase project to widen existing Clinton Keith Road east of the I-15 freeway in the City of Wildomar. Phase 1 widens the road from Arya Drive to the eastern city limits (Copper Craft Drive), to provide a minimum of four-lanes of traffic (two in each direction) throughout the entire segment, and Phase 2 widens the road from Arya Drive to Elizabeth Lane to six-lanes (three in each direction).

ON-CALL STAFF SERVICES CITY OF EASTVALE
Environmental planning manager who provided oversight
and coordination for all environmental documents
prepared for the City. Managed consultants hired by
project applicants to prepare environmental documents
and reviewed all consultant-prepared environmental
documents. Prepared staff reports and presented projects to the planning commission and the city council.

ON-CALL STAFF SERVICES CITY OF WILDOMAR
Planning manager who prepared environmental
documents and provided planning recommendations
for development projects in the city. Responded to
technical questions from staff, the public, and elected officials regarding all levels of development review and approval. Managed other consultants preparing all levels of environmental review. Provided technical direction to the applicant and other consulting teams regarding the level of analysis and the effectiveness of mitigation.

MALIA DURAND*

NEPA/CEQA

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental Science, San Diego State University

REGISTRATION
Certified Inspector of Sediment and Erosion Control In-Training (CISEC-IT) Malia is a highly skilled environmental land use planner with over 16 years of experience in environmental review and urban planning. She is an adept problem solver and a strong leader with excellent communication and interpersonal skills. Malia specializes in managing a wide variety of CEQA/NEPA public and private- sector development projects. Her experience includes managing a team of urban and environmental planners and overseeing the production of numerous environmental projects, as well as planning and zoning projects throughout Southern California. She has also led and participated in critical negotiations with local, state, and federal resource agencies regarding impacts to sensitive habitat, jurisdictional resources, and species listed by the California and federal Endangered Species Acts.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

ONTARIO AVENUE WIDENING, CORONA
Environmental project manager providing environmental
support for the improvements and widening of Ontario
Avenue from Lincoln Avenue to Conejo Street in the City of Corona. Enhancements include widening of one lane
vehicular travel in each direction with improved bicycle & pedestrian accommodations, raised median, roadway
lighting, improved property access & installed driveways, signal installations/modifications, utility relocations/ horizontal setbacks, sewer laterals, drainage improvements, corridor continuity, and other mitigation measures to
address residents’ concerns. These improvements will
ultimately provide three lanes of vehicular travel in each direction and a Class II Bikeway in the eastbound direction, while preserving the surrounding environment.

SAN VICENTE ROAD WIDENING PROJECT,

SAN DIEGO COUTNY
Assisted in preparation of the EIR for a project in the unincorporated community of Ramona in northern San
Diego County’s Ramona Community Planning Area The
county completed improvements to a 2.25-mile-long
segment of San Vicente Road from Warnock Drive to just
east of Wildcat Canyon Road that included two travel
lanes, two bicycle lanes, a stabilized decomposed granite (DG) pathway on the west/south side of the road, a native graded parkway on the east/north side of the road,
and turn lanes at the intersections with Warnock Drive
and Wildcat Canyon Road. Curve and road elevation
realignments improved horizontal and vertical sight
distances for motorists.

LEGACY HIGHLANDS INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN EIR

PEER REVIEW, BEAUMONT
Environmental lead providing third party peer review
as part of an on-call environmental services contract
with the City of Beaumont for the EIR for The 2022
Legacy Highlands Industrial Specific Plan Project on a
site that encompasses approximately 1,365.14 acres,
located south of the SR-60 Freeway and east of Potrero
Boulevard, adjacent to the southwestern portion of the
City of Beaumont. The project proposes construction and operation of up to approximately 20,406,000 square feet of warehouse uses and up to approximately 143,000 square
feet of general commercial (shopping center) uses on
approximately 780.98 acres. Approximately 554.44 acres, or 40.6 percent of the total Specific Plan area would remain undeveloped and preserved as Open Space Land Use.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

WORKS, SAN DIEGO COUNTY
Land use/environmental planner at the County. Malia
managed the environmental processing of CIPs, from
concept through construction and final mitigation sign-off.

Projects included road improvements, bridge rehabilitation and construction, flood control facilities, dump remediation, and complex emergency repair projects. She conducted
critical negotiations with local, state, and federal resource agency representatives for all permitting and compensatory mitigation associated with impacts to sensitive habitat, jurisdictional resources, and listed species. Malia performed environmental code compliance, violation resolution, and environmental remediation, and maintained up-to-date
knowledge of environmental laws, regulations, and policy governing both public and private development. During her time at the County, Malia frequently presented to members of the public, stakeholder groups, community planning
groups, and representatives of state and federal regulatory agencies. She also spearheaded the development of
numerous technological advances for essential countywide programs, resulting in substantial labor and cost savings. [*] - Assistant Environmental Lead as Necessary
JOHN M cCARTHY, PE, CFM

HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS LEAD

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #47583 | CA CFM #05-01596
John is experienced in the development, design, and construction of flood control and drainage improvements for transportation and public works projects. His experience is concentrated in the field of stormwater management, including hydrology studies, detailed hydraulic analyses, floodplain managements, and improvement plan preparation. He has prepared drainage studies and floodplain evaluations for transportation projects throughout Southern California. He has extensive experience working with the Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District in Moreno Valley area including the design for the Moreno MDP Facility Line F and the Perris Valley MDP Line B Improvements on the March Air Force Base (MAFB).

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

MORENO MDP FACILITY LINE F IMPROVEMENTS,

MORENO VALLEY
Drainage manager for the preparation of final PS&E for
the improvement to Line F from Redlands Boulevard
to Alessandro Boulevard. John is providing processing
improvements through RCFC&WCD for project approvals.

BEDFORD CANYON CHANNEL-STAGE 1

IMPROVEMENTS, CORONA
Drainage manager leading engineering and design for the channel improvements from I-15 to T emescal Creek. The team developed hydrology and hydraulics models for the channel, prepared alternatives analysis, and is completing the PS&E for the final design of the recommended improvements.

CHERRY STREET EXTENSION, TEMECULA
Drainage manager for the preparation of hydraulic
and scour studies along Murrieta Creek to support the
proposed extension of Cherry Street. John prepared new
HEC-RAS hydraulic models for the existing and project
conditions, which included proposed crossings of the creek.

He evaluated the existing levees and prepared updated
flood mapping.

PERRIS VALLEY MDP FACILITY LINE B,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Drainage lead for the preparation of hydrology and
hydraulic studies to support the final design for the
extension for MDP Facility Line B from Van Buren Blvd to the railroad. John processed analysis through March JPA and RCFC&WCD for approvals.

RCFC&WCD ON-CALL CONTRACT, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Program manager who provided drainage and flood control planning and engineering services under an on-call contract with the District. The projects included regional hydrology study for the Murrieta Creek Watershed, hydrology and
hydraulic modeling for floodplain revisions along T emecula Creek, and investigations and repairs for drainage systems at the Woodcrest and Sycamore Canyon Dams.

CALTRANS ON-CALL TECHNICAL HYDRAULIC

SERVICES
Project manager for numerous task orders under this on- call contract with Caltrans HQ. T asks included development of geomorphic considerations for hydraulic cross drainage and design guidance for bio-engineered channel systems.

PINE STREET WIDENING, COROINA
Drainage lead for the preparation of drainage studies and storm drain/culvert improvements plans for widening of Pine Street from SR-83 to Hellman Avenue. Included design for regional master planned facility Line J crossing. Work in the area also included regional hydrology and hydraulic studies to update the Preserve Master Plan of Drainage to support the design of the Pine Avenue culvert crossings.

REMI CANDAELE,
PE, MS, QSD, QISP *

HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS

EDUCATION
MS, Civil Engineering, Water Resources, University of Texas at Austin

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #77517
Remi has 18 years of extensive experience in surface water management. He has been involved with a variety of projects including, but not limited to, hydromodification management plans, BMP design, TMDL development, comprehensive restoration plans, retrofitting studies, water harvesting, economic analyses, and statistical analyses.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

RCTD NPDES COMPLIANCE ON-CALL,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Hydrology/hydraulics support who provided assistance on construction site inspection for general permit compliance on Caltrans oversight projects and non-Caltrans projects.

Responsibilities included SWPPP review including redlines, specific comments, and assistance to RCTD staff in
developing a document review procedure. Remi also
provided BMP evaluation and recommendations for highway and roadway sites, post construction BMP selection and
design including WQMP development, and development
and delivery of extensive CGP and MS4 compliance training for RCTD plan checkers and inspectors.

CALTRANS TMDL DISTRICT 8 ASSISTANCE/NUTRIENTS

TMDLS FOR LAKE ELSINORE AND CANYON LAKE,

SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES
Hydrology/hydraulics support who provided water quality engineering such as assisting the District in addressing issues pertaining to total maximum daily loads (TMDL)
within the Counties of Riverside and San Bernardino.

Services included review of basin plan amendments,
resolutions, and other technical documentation, detailed analysis of technical aspects of TMDLs, assistance in
drafting comments and technical documents, and
assistance with meetings, workshops, and public hearings.

HYDROMODIFICATION MANAGEMENT PLAN & LOW

IMPACT DEVELOPMENT MANUAL, RIVERSIDE COUNTY

FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Remi co-authored the Santa Ana and Santa Margarita
Region HMPs, edited the LID BMP Manual, WQMP
templates, and Model WQMP to reflect the content of
the HMP , and led the development of associated technical studies. Candaele created HMP monitoring plans to
evaluate the HMP effectiveness. Providing technical
assistance for the negotiations with Regional Boards.

Remi worked with Clear Creek Solutions to develop the
Santa Margarita Region Hydrology Model (SMRHM). He
hosted multiple-day trainings for City stormwater leads, implementation staff, and plan checkers.

CALTRANS DISTRICT 3 ASSISTANCE - LAKE TAHOE

TMDL, LAKE TAHOE
Hydrology/hydraulics support who provided assistance
with technical review and implementation of water quality control measures to reduce sediment and nutrient loads to the lake. He assisted with the Lake T ahoe TMDL Strategic Plan that identified specific implementation measures to achieve compliance with the TMDL. Remi was in charge of modeling pollutant loads from roadways draining to Lake T ahoe using the Pollutant Load Reduction Model (PLRM).

As-needed professional services were provided to Caltrans Headquarters and District 3 to assist with technical review and implementation of the Lake T ahoe total maximum
daily load (TMDL) and other TMDLs in the region. Caltrans is a named stakeholder in the Lake T ahoe TMDL, and is
required to implement water quality control measures to reduce sediment and nutrient loads to the lake. The TMDL is intended to improve lake clarity.
[*] - Assistant Hydrology/Hydraulics Lead as Necessary

DAVE MORITZ, PLS

RIGHT-OF-WAY COORDINATION

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering and Land Surveying Option, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

REGISTRATION
CA PLS #7388
Dave has 31 years of experience managing on-call survey contracts, right-of-way engineering, survey control, official maps and records, topographic mapping, utility engineering, and large scale infrastructure projects. He has spent a large portion of his career working in client offices to provide program management, project management and staff augmentation services. He has developed survey programs that support large right-of-way acquisition and subsurface utility engineering (SUE) projects. Dave is responsible for project planning and coordinating work among in-house staff, clients and subconsultants. He serves as client liaison, attends coordination and kickoff meetings, and is the primary contact person on various contracts. Dave is also involved in the coordination and oversight of work among clients, title companies, project surveyors and CAD staff, as well as in-house civil engineers. Dave has worked in Orange, Los Angeles, Riverside, San Bernardino, Imperial, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Ventura, and Kern counties throughout the State of California.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

LAGUNA CANYON ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PA/ED,

LAGUNA BEACH
Survey manager for preliminary engineering and
environmental documentation in support of the City’s
goals and priorities for the Laguna Canyon Road corridor.

It involves enhancing safety by removing utility poles and undergrounding overhead power & communications
facilities, eliminating a potential source of wildfire and improving aesthetics, providing multi-modal improvements that will encourage pedestrians, transit users, & bicyclists with dedicated facilities and improved safety, and
developing innovative solutions to improve throughput
without adding roadway capacity, particularly facilitating the trolley to and from remote parking lots for seasonal peaks and special events.

YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD/SAVI RANCH PARKWAY

WIDENING PR/ED, YORBA LINDA
Survey manager for the PR/ED road widening phase to
widen Yorba Linda Boulevard from La Palma Avenue to
Santa Ana Canyon Road, including the bridge over the
Santa Ana River. Responsible for providing survey control, ROW determination, and aerial photogrammetry, and
design surveys in support of design to reconfigure Savi Ranch Parkway and ease congestion in the area.

ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEERING

SERVICES, RIALTO
Project surveyor supporting this on-call contract that
required a “turn-key” team to provide responsive services for various projects. Scope of work includes preliminary planning and cost estimating for capital improvement
projects, project management and preparation of
feasibility studies, preparation and completion of design and construction documents (plans, specifications and
engineering estimates) for street improvement projects, sewer improvement projects, storm drainage projects,
water delivery, conveyance, and storage systems, and
complex structures (short span bridges, culverts, retaining walls, sound walls, etc.), right-of-way acquisition services including other efforts necessary to acquire right-of-way and easements for public infrastructure, pre-construction outreach service, appraisal services, the evaluation of existing infrastructure and facilities for compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements and
preparation of transition plans, performing contract
administration functions, negotiations on behalf of the City, and recommending change orders when applicable,
and representing the City in meetings with contractors, developers, consultants, utility agencies, and others.

BEAUMONT SR-60 POTRERO INTERCHANGE PHASE 2,

BEAUMONT
Project surveyor for the preparation of PS&E to construct a new interchange connection to SR-60 at Potrero Boulevard.

The project creates a new Type L-9 interchange that
will provide full access to SR-60 at Potrero Boulevard.

Potrero Boulevard will be a six-lane facility between Willow Springs Parkway and Western Knolls Avenue. The existing eastbound SR-60 San Timoteo Creek Bridge crossing is
being widened to accommodate a two-lane off ramp and
a westbound auxiliary lane will be constructed.

RICKY CHAN, PE, TE, PTOE

SIGNAL/ELECTRICAL DESIGN

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, University of California, Irvine

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #C71389 | CA TE #2673 | CA PTOE #3658
Ricky has 24 years of experience in transportation, traffic, and municipal engineering projects. Ricky is highly organized and manages projects using a hands-on style. He maintains close communication with clients and follows-through on tasks leading to project delivery. Ricky has worked on a variety of roadway, bikeway, and traffic related projects as well as site projects. Experience includes roadway geometrics, intersection widening, local street design, utility coordination, traffic engineering including design of signals, signing and striping, and traffic control design, construction inspection of traffic signal systems, and communication systems design, federal funding management, and PS&E projects.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

JEFFREY/IRVINE CENTER DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS,
IRVINE
T raffic engineer for providing final engineering design services for the proposed traffic signal modification, signing and striping, and stage construction plans for the Jeffrey Road/Irvine Center Drive intersection improvements project.

YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD WIDENING AND

SAVI RANCH PARKWAY WIDENING, YORBA LINDA
Senior engineer for final design services for the widening of Yorba Linda Boulevard and Savi Ranch Parkway that
includes the bridge widening over the Santa Ana River.

Scope of work includes PS&E for both as well as leading the efforts on regulatory permitting processes.

ANAHEIM BOULEVARD AND WATER STREET

INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, AHAHEIM
Project manager responsible for preparing curb ramp
improvement plans to accommodate the new signal,
crosswalk, and striping installations. City of Anaheim
planned to convert this two-way stop sign intersection
into signalized intersection. The intersection’s curb ramps needed to be updated to meet the current ADA standards.

The project included: field investigation, review of existing site and curb ramps, review of existing signal equipment, ADA curb ramp design, and curb ramp detail preparation..

SOUTH HIGHLAND AVENUE AT MANGO AVENUE

TRAFFIC SIGNAL, FONTANA
Project manager for signalizing and widening this
T-intersection while constructing minor improvements
including the construction of curb access return ramps to ultimate locations determined by the Circulation Master Plan, curb and gutter, and an asphalt concrete transition to the existing asphalt concrete pavement. Services included field investigation, utility research, utility mapping, utility potholing, sight distance analysis, street improvements, signing and striping, traffic signal, coordination with SCE, signal communication, street lighting, shop drawing review, and construction support.

ALICIA PARKWAY AND MARINA HILLS DRIVE

RESURFACING, LAGUNA NIGUEL
Project manager for the rehabilitation of Alicia Parkway and Marina Hills Drive including upgrading 31 non-ADA
compliant curb ramps. The project also included traffic signal modification plans for adding traffic signal video/ radar detection system to four intersections. Other project services included, field review, surveying, geotechnical investigations, traffic index calculations, pavement analysis, geotechnical report, utility adjustments, striping design (adding buffered bike lane), final PS&E, bidding document preparation, and construction support.

PAUL HERMANN, TE

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS/LIGHTING

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, Pomona

REGISTRATION
CA Traffic Engineer (TE) #TR2797
Paul has 13 years of experience in transportation engineering and transportation planning. He has led a wide variety of projects including traffic studies, infrastructure projects, travel demand forecasting, parking and circulation studies, and long- range development is an expert in SB 743 Implementation and VMT Analysis for CEQA projects. He is also an active member in F&P’s SB 743, Evacuation Planning and Safety Working Groups which hold weekly discussions on evolving industry best practices. He is also an active member in F&P’ Parking and Land Use in T ransportation Discipline Group.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
I-10 CHERRY VALLEY BOULEVARD, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
QA/QC engineer for the Caltrans Project Approval
Environmental Documentation (PA/ED) for this RCTD project.

Project includes development of future traffic volumes in the area. F&P also developed a VISSIM microsimulation
model to evaluate traffic operations for the No Build and Build Alternatives. Using future traffic volumes and the microsimulation, F&P also assisted the team with alternative screening in order to determine which alternatives should be considered as part of the T raffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR). The TOAR documented operations analysis for the arterial and freeway facilities in the study area for Existing, Opening Y ear, and Design Y ear. In addition, we are assisting the team to develop and evaluate interchange concepts as part of the ICE process.

SR-60 RUBIDOUX INTERCHANGE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
F&P was part of a team performing the interchange
analysis for the County of Riverside. We obtained and
reviewed existing studies and relevant information that evaluate the project area from the adjacent cities, County of Riverside, and/or Caltrans. Our Traffic Engineering
Performance Assessment (TEPA) was based on traffic
forecasts and traffic capacity analysis for the design year for the interchange. Part of the TEPA included identifying the scope for the traffic report that will be needed as part of the PA/ED phase of the project. F&P performed initial assessment of various interchange layouts, which included Tight Diamond, DDI, Roundabout, SPUI, and Partial
Cloverleaf. This was included in the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) process for the project. Based on the traffic forecasts and the results of the ICE review, F&P assisted the project team in developing up to three project alternatives for consideration in the traffic analysis.

EL TORO ETHANAC EXPRESSWAY, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
F&P completed a comprehensive transportation
assessment to extend Ethanac to SR-74 (both to the west and via a grade separation to the east) and extend Nichols Road to collect to SR-74 to the east, essentially creating a new cross-county corridor connecting I-215 to I-15. As part of this effort, they completed a multitude of travel demand forecasts to assist in identifying when parallel infrastructure degrades operationally and to develop a delivery strategy for the County. The work included multiple public outreach meetings and extensive coordination with decision makers along the corridor, including RCTD, RCTC, and the Cities of Lake Elsinore, Perris, and Menifee.

ON-CALL CONSULTING SERVICES
On-call consultant for several cities and agencies for traffic engineering and planning services. Key active on-call
contracts are noted below:
• City of Eastvale T raffic Engineering and Planning
• Cal Poly Pomona T ransportation Design &
Planning Services
• City of Santa Ana CEQA Peer Review
• City of Corona T ransportation Study Peer Review
• City of Menifee CEQA Peer Review
• City of Anaheim Public Works &
Community Development

ALAHESH THURAIRAJAH,
PE, GE, BC.GE

GEOTECHNICAL

EDUCATION
MS, Civil Engineering (Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering), University of California, Los Angeles BS, Civil Engineering, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

REGISTRATION
CA Civil PE #C81439 | CA GE #G3123 | ASCE BC.GE01457
Alahesh is a geotechnical principal/project manager with 15 years of experience on California transportation projects. He has provided geotechnical design/construction recommendations for 300+ bridges, 400+ standard and non-standard retaining walls, and 200+ miles of roadway. He has prepared foundation reports and geotechnical reports in for numerous transportation projects. In addition to his project management skills, his technical expertise includes design of deep and shallow foundation for bridges, retaining walls, and drainage structures, probabilistic seismic hazard evaluation, liquefaction and seismic settlement evaluations, lateral spreading evaluation, static and pseudo-static slope stability analyses, pavement structural section evaluation/design, and corrosion evaluation. He has provided construction support including plan reviews, and observation and inspection for driven piles, CIDH piles, excavations, and engineering fill placements.

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS

INDIAN STREET/CARDINAL AVENUE BRIDGE,

MORENO VALLEY
Geotechnical project manager for the project improvement that includes constructing a new bridge over Perris Valley Storm Channel Lateral A and associated approach roadway improvements. As part of the planning phase, Alahesh
obtained three bulk samples within channel bed and
performed sieve analyses for scour study. He is currently working on the planning for field investigation for final design.

LIMONITE GAP CLOSURE PROJECT, EASTVALE
Geotechnical principal for this project that included
constructing a new roadway bridge and a new pedestrian
and bicycle bridge over the Cucamonga Creek Channel
and associated approach embankment improvements.

Alahesh planned and managed site-specific geotechnical
field investigation, assigned lab tests, developed and
provided design and construction recommendations
for bridge foundations, retaining walls, and pavement
structural sections. He prepared the foundation report to provide all the design and construction recommendations, and executed the project within budget and schedule.

I-215/HARLEY KNOX BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE,

RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND PERRIS
Geotechnical project manager for this project that proposes the replacement of the existing interchange with a tight- diamond interchange (TDI) or diverging-diamond interchange (DDI) or single-point urban interchange (SPUI). The proposed project improvements include widening existing bridge
structures over the SCRRA tracks and I-215 and widening off- ramps and NB on-ramp. Alahesh developed and provided
preliminary geotechnical engineering recommendations
for bridges, retaining walls, embankments, and pavement structural sections. He prepared the structure preliminary geotechnical reports, district preliminary geotechnical report, and preliminary materials report per Caltrans guidelines.

I-215/PLACENTIA AVENUE INTERCHANGE

IMPROVEMENTS (MID COUNTY PARKWAY PHASE I),

RIVERSIDE COUNTY AND PERRIS
Geotechnical project manager for this proposed project
constructing a new interchange along the I-215 at Placentia Avenue with new ramps on the east and west side of the
I-215 in a diamond-interchange configuration, shifting
the East Frontage Road east of the interchange, and the closure of the West Frontage Road. In addition to the new ramps, the proposed improvements included southern
widening of Placentia Avenue, which widens the existing bridge structures over the SCRRA tracks and I-215. Alahesh managed field investigation, developed and provided design and construction recommendations for bridge foundations, sign foundations, engineering fill placement, drainage
structures, and pavement structural sections. He prepared the foundation reports, geotechnical design report, and materials report in compliance with Caltrans standards.

Alahesh also responded to Caltrans’ review comments.

PACIFIC AVENUE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE

IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, JURUPA VALLEY
Geotechnical principal for the City of Jurupa Valley
proposed construction of new sidewalks, curb and gutters, rehabilitation of the existing pavement, and widening of the existing roadway along Pacific Avenue between Limonite
Avenue and Mission Boulevard. Alahesh oversaw the field investigation and pavement rehab recommendations
prepared by EMI staff. He also reviewed the pavement
memorandum prepared by EMI staff.

CONTRACT

EXPECTIONS

CONTRACT EXCEPTIONS

CONTRACT AGREEMENT DEVIATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS

REQUEST WITH SUPPORTING REASONS
Mark Thomas has no conflicts of interest, is able to meet the insurance requirements, and affirms our understanding of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services, conflicts of interest provisions, and insurance provisions as outlined in the RFP . We have reviewed the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services contract, and request the following modifications.

14. Indemnification.
a. Design Pr ofessional Services. T o the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 2782.8, in performing “design professional services” as defined in Section 2782.8, the Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, but not defend defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from applicable any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant’s employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with but only to the extent actually caused by the negligent, reckless, or willful misconduct in the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant under this RFP and/or related Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction, provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence, active
negligence, or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees, and does not apply to any passive negligence of City unless caused at least in part by Consultant. Notwithstanding the duty to indemnify and hold harmless, the Consultant expressly agrees, after adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, to reimburse the Client pursuant to this provision for any costs and fees determined by the court to have been reasonably, necessarily and actually incurred by the Client in the defense of those claims specifically caused by the Consultant’s negligence.
b. Non-Design Pr ofessional Services. For all non-design professional services, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and save the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents
and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any person, including injury to the Consultant’s employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant, or are caused or claim to be caused by the acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction, provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.
c. If Consultant should subcontract all or any por tion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each subconsultant to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, and agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

EXHIBIT “F”

SUPPLEMENTARY GENERAL CONDITIONS
h) P atent rights with respect to any discovery or invention which arises or is developed in the course of or under the Agr eement shall be retained by the CITY .
i) Copyrights and rights in data developed in the course of or under the Agreement shall be the property of the CIT Y . FEMA/CalOES reserve a royalty-free, nonexclusive, irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use or authorize to other s to use for federal purposes a copyright in any work developed under the Agreement and/or subcontracts for work pur suant to the Agreement.

MARB
LETTER
Add a note in a shaded box
here:We will pick up where this
team left off, this correspondence
was based on the review of the
concept plans also included in
this appendix. We can update the
concepts to include the Harly Knox
roundabout and address these
comments while survey and the
technical/ engineerings studies
are in process. This will streamline
MARB input during preliminary
engineering.

DETAILED

SCOPE OF
WORK

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

1 Task 1.0 – Project Management / Administration
Task 1.1 – Project Administration
Mark Thomas will perform project administration. The tasks will include documentation, meeting management, budget tracking, project task tracking, etc. to maintain project schedule and goals.

Task 1.2 – Project Team Meetings
Upon issuance of the Notice to proceed, Mark Thomas will coordinate and conduct monthly Project Development Team Meetings with the City and pertinent stakeholders to review city/agency comments, discuss design issues, evaluate risk, review schedule, and coordinate decisions pertinent to finalizing the design. Prior to each meeting, Mark Thomas will issue an agenda package and upon completion develop action items and meeting minutes for team distribution.

Task 1.3 – Quality Control & Quality Assurance (QC/QA)
Using our internal Quality Control Manual and Proce dures, Mark Thomas will perform thorough disciplina ry and interdisciplinary reviews for all design calculatio ns, reports, and intermediate submittals (prelimina ry, 65% and 90%).

Checklists will be used to ensure that all aspects of the project have been adequately reviewed for quality.

Task 1 - Deliverables:
• Meeting Attendance, Agendas, and Minutes (16).
• Quality Control Checklists.

Task 1 - Assumptions:
• It is assumed the project will start July 2024 and be ready for construction by May 2025.

Task 2.0 – Research & Field Investigations
Task 2.1 – Field Investigations / Site Photographs
Mark Thomas will field walk site and inventory visible utility, topography, drainage, and other notable features.

Additionally, Mark Thomas will generate field notes and a 360-degree photograph log with GIS mapping link.

Task 2.2 – Record Maps / As-Built Research
Prior to commencing any surveying/boundary retracement activities, Mark Thomas will secure available research from the City, City of Perris, County of Riverside, Rive rside County Flood Control and Water Conservation D istrict (RCFC & WCD), March Air Reserve Base (MARB), Inland Port Airport Authority (March JPA), and any project information supplied by the City. The following is included as part of this scope of services:

1. Secure vesting deeds and review to establish owners hip of all recorded interests, including fee owners hip of Impacted properties as Identified in the Project Understanding.

2. Review Preliminary Title Reports from Nossaman, no Preliminary Title Reports were included within this scope of services.

3. Secure available parcel/tract/records of survey/cor ner records/record mapping from the Riverside Count y Surveyor.

4. Request from the City, City of Perris and County an y available documentation showing centerline monume nt ties, benchmarks, roadway vacation documents, as-bu ilt improvement plans, and building and safety rela ted permits/land covenants.

5. Secure records/roadway and drainage as-builts (as made available).

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

2 Task 2.3 – Survey
Task 2.3.1 - Control
Mark Thomas will establish horizontal control based on CCS83, Zone V, 2017.5 epoch adjustment, and vertical w ill be based on NAVD 88 Vertical Datum.

We will also locate survey monuments/cadaster along Heacock Street between San Michele Road to Harley Knox Boulevard.

Task 2.3.2 – Boundary Retracement
Utilizing the information gathered as identified in Tasks 2.2 and 2.3.1, Mark Thomas will review and analyz e the property / rights of way information obtained and existing survey mon uments located along the Project limits. Mark Thomas will create a land net base map in autocad format that includes the follow ing information:
1) Street centerlines, existing rights of way, and jur isdictional limits (i.e. MARB easterly limits, Perr is Valley Channel Lateral B northerly/southerly limits, Moreno Valley/Perris Ci ty Limits) along Heacock Street between San Michele Road to Harley Knox Boulevard.
2) Easements/encumbrances within potential property ac quisition limits needed for the Project based upon PTRs to be provided by the City.

The land net base map will be used as the basis of existing center lines, rights of way, and easements for the Project.

Task 2.3.3 – Topographic Survey
Mark Thomas will perform a topographic survey usin g conventional surveying methods to map planimetri c features generally over a swath spanning from the MARB fence (westerly) to 200 feet easterly of the easterly ed ge of existing Heacock Street roadway, between five hundred (500) feet north and south of the San Michele Road and H arley Knox Boulevard intersections, respectively. Mapped features will generally include roof outlines of buildings and other major structures, edge of pavement for all paved surfaces, manholes, drop inlets, dirt roads and drives, trails, sidewalks, fences, walls, signs, utility poles, light poles, above gro und utility service facilities, storm drain facilit ies, ditches, streams, trees/tree outlines, dense brush, bulkheads, bridge s, Perris Valley Channel Lateral B and other draina ge channels / ditches / structures, and other visible improvement s at the surface elevation. Mass points and break l ines will be collected along all mapped improvements listed abov e to create continuous contours with a 1.0’ interva l and a Digital Terrain Model (DTM). This information will be comp iled in a draft Topographic Survey Base Map with ae rial imagery background at 1” = 40’ scale
Critical areas including conform/join locations and where drainage improvements are anticipated. The following is included in these efforts:
• Heacock Street – Between San Michele Road intersection and up to five hundred (500) feet north, and between Harley Knox Boulevard and up to five hundred (500) feet south, including the full intersections. • Side Streets (San Michell Road, Nandina Avenue, Harley Knox Boulevard) – Between the intersection and up to five hundred (500) feet east / west of respective intersections. • Drainage Facilities – Existing inverts on each side of Heacock Street for the existing reinforced conc rete box culverts (single 8’x7’ and dual 14’x9’) and on each side of San Michele Road for the existing reinforced concrete box culvert (dual 11’x8’) west of Heacock Street. Additionally, inverts of both outlet structures from MARB on the west side of Heacock Street between San Michele Road and Perris Valley Channel Lateral B. • MARB Security Fence – Existing security fence along the west side of Heacock Street between San Michele Road and Harley Knox Boulevard.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

3 • Utility Potholes – Upon completion of utility potholes in Task 2.4.4, location of up to 10 existing pothole surface elevations.

Mark Thomas will utilize this information to update existing base mapping and create the final Topographic Survey Base Map in autocad format and update the DTM to be used as the basis of existing improvements for the Project design.

Task 2.4 – Utilities
Task 2.4.1 – Introductory Letters
Mark Thomas will verify all utility owners and cont acts within the Project limits using Underground Search Alert and requesting a list of utility contacts the City has on file. Mar k Thomas will generate A Letters (Introductory Lett ers)/Records Requests on City letterhead to request utility as-builts. Mark Thom as will follow-up with each utility owner through e mails and phone calls to verify the existence of any utilities and to secure availa ble records and as-built information.

Task 2.4.2 – Utility Base Maps
Mark Thomas will prepare the utility base map after receiving the as-builts from utility owners (Task 2.4.1) and completion of boundary retracement (Task 2.3.2) and topographic surv ey (Task 2.3.3) in autocad format.

Task 2.4.3 – Utility Coordination
Mark Thomas will also prepare and send Utility B and C letters to utility owners. Utility B letter (Relocation Claim Letter with Utility Conflict Sheets after the 65% submitta l. Utility C letter will be the Notice to Owners L etters after the 90% submittal to appropriate utility owners. Coordinat ion will include preparation of a Utility Matrix th at will capture all utility owner contact information and document corr espondence/communication with utility owners throug hout the project duration.

Lastly, should Utility Agreements be necessary, Mark Thomas will notify City staff and put them in touch with utility planners to execute a utility agreement.

Task 2 - Deliverables:
• Field Notes, 360 Degree Photography Log.
• Compiled Research / Record Plans.
• Project Control Plan Sheet, PNEZD Project Control Report in TXT and PDF formats, Topographic Survey Base Map in PDF and AutoCAD formats, Land Net Base Map in PD F and AutoCAD formats, Digital Terrain Model (DTM) in electronic format.
• A-B-C Utility Letters, Utility Matrix, Utility Base Map in AutoCAD format.

Task 2 - Assumptions:
• Preliminary Title Reports were not included in this scope of services, it was assumed these would be provided by the City.
• Assumed up to $500 in ODC’s for agency fees for obtaining record documents. • A Record of Survey is not included in this scope of work but may be required by law. If a Record of Su rvey is required a fee will be negotiated.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

4 Task 3.0 – NEPA/CEQA Compliance
Task 3.1 – Coordination / Meetings
Throughout the environmental review process, Mark Thomas and PlaceWorks will coordinate/consult with local and state entities relative to the environmental review process; and coordination and communications with the City to ensure compliance with policies, procedures, and any applicable codes.

Task 3.2 – Project Description
Mark Thomas will develop a clear and detailed project description, including a purpose and needs statement for use in the NEPA/CEQA document. The project description wil l provide a narrative of the City’s proposed road i mprovements and will be the blueprint for all environmental ana lysis. The purposes and needs statement will provid e information regarding the reasons for initiating the project and a set of objectives (purposes) the project intends to meet.

Task 3.3 – Technical Analysis
The following technical studies are included to sup port the CEQA Initial Study and NEPA Environmental Assessment as appendices:
• Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis : This includes preparation of an air quality, ener gy, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions analysis to evaluate potential impacts from construction and operation of the proposed project. The analysis will be consistent w ith the current methodology of the South Coast Air Quality Management City (South Coast AQMD). Modeling of criteria air pollutant emissions and GHG emissions will be conducted using the latest California Emissions Est imator Model (CalEEMod). Mitigation measures to red uce potential impacts will be incorporated, as needed, to reduce potentially significant impacts of the project. • Noise : This includes preparation of a noise and vibration technical analyses to support the City of Moreno Valley in relation to the analysis for the Heacock Street South Extension Project. The technical noise impact analysis will discuss relevant standards and criteria for no ise exposure, including those in the March Air Rese rve Base / Inland Port Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, Ci ty of Moreno Valley General Plan Noise Element, and Municipal Code. The results of this analysis will b e summarized in the environmental document prepared for the proposed project, and modeling will be provided in an appendix. • Biological Resources Survey : This includes research of available information, including relevant literature, databases, agency web sites, various previously com pleted reports and management plans, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data, maps, aerial imager y from public domain sources, and in-house records to: 1) assess habitats, special-status plant and wildlife species, jurisdictional waters, critical habitats, and wildlife corridors that may occur in and near the project si te, and 2) identify local or regional plans, polici es, and regulations that may apply to the project.

Following the literature review, this team will con duct a reconnaissance-level biological survey on th e project site and a 500-foot zone out from the project site. This survey area is referred to as the Biological Study Area (BSA). The survey will include the following:
o Habitat assessment and plant community mapping.
o Riparian/riverine/vernal pools and fairy shrimp habitat assessment. o General plant survey.
o General wildlife survey.
o Step I burrowing owl habitat assessment.
o Jurisdictional assessment.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

5 o Wildlife movement evaluation
• Biological Resources Survey Report/Natural Environm ental Study (NES) : Following completion of the reconnaissance-level biological surveys, this team will prepare a biological resources evaluation report that will:
1) summarize existing conditions; 2) assess the pot ential presence of sensitive biological resources; 3) analyze the potential impacts on those resources from proje ct development; 4) recommend, as appropriate, best management practices (BMPs), avoidance and protecti on measures, and mitigation measures to avoid, eliminate and/or reduce environmental impacts to le ss than significant levels; and 5) an identificatio n of biological permits or approvals that the project may need. The report will include: 1) methods and results of the literature review and field surveys; 2) figures dep icting the size and location of plant communities a nd other sensitive biological resources; 3) a complete flora and fauna compendium; and 4) site photographs. • Biological Assessment : Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires federal agencies to consult with the USFWS to ensure that the activities they authorize, fund, or carry out do not jeopardize the continued existence of federally protected species or their critical habitats. A search of the USFWS’s Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) System revealed the potential for eleven federally listed species to occur in the project vicinity. If suitable habitat and/or individuals of these species are found to have the potential to be impacted by the proposed project, then a biological assessment (BA) will need to be prepared. Data collected durin g the biological resource survey report preparation will be utilized to draft a BA. The BA will be prepared in accordance with the National Marine Fisheries Service and US F ish and Wildlife Service Section 7 Consultation Han dbook.

Potential impacts to listed species, avoidance and minimization measures taken to reduce or eliminate those potential impacts, and all conservation measures proposed to offset unavoidable impacts to protected species will be incorporated. The draft version of the BA w ill be submitted to the City for review. Comments a nd edits will be considered, and the final version of the BA will be prepared for submittal to facilitate consu ltation with the USFWS for any federal authorization (e.g., 404 permit). In the event a project does not require fe deral authorization, consultation with the USFWS will need to be completed under Section 10 of the ESA and utilizing the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) process.
• Jurisdictional Delineation Survey: This team will conduct a formal jurisdictional delineation survey on the project site according to current U.S. Army Corps of Engine ers (USACE) and California Department of Fish and W ildlife (CDFW) guidelines. The survey will record: 1) wetland hydrology, hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and signs of an ordinary high-water mark (OHWM); 2) the prese nce of a well-defined bed and bank; 3) areas of wat er flow; and 4) vegetation within and along the jurisd ictional areas. Width and length measurements of US ACE, RWQCB, and CDFW jurisdictional areas will be deline ated in the field using a hand-held GPS unit, 100-m eter measuring tape, and aerial imagery. Following field mapping, Measurements will occur based on ArcGIS f iles including acreages of each agency’s jurisdiction.
• Phase 1 Cultural Resources Survey Technical Report : The survey is required by the City of Moreno Valley, as lead agency for the project, with possible federal revie w by the March Air Reserve Base and/or the March Jo int Powers Authority. Therefore, the study will be cond ucted in accordance with the California Environment al Quality Act (CEQA) and the requirements of the Secretary of Interior Standards and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), as amended.
• Initial Site Assessment: This includes a review of historical records/permits to identify potential hazardous waste located on lands adjacent to the project limits.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

6 Task 3.4 – CEQA/NEPA Environmental Analysis
Administrative Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (IS/EA) This includes preparation of an administrative draft IS/EA in conformance with NEPA requirements. The administrative draft IS/EA will contain all required components pursuant to CEQA and NEPA. The major sections and areas of concern to be addressed include: aesthetics, agriculture an d forestry resources, air quality, biological resou rces, cultural and historical resources, energy, geology and geologic constraints, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use an d planning, mineral resources, noise, public servic es and utilities, socioeconomics, traffic and circulation, wildfire, cumulative impacts and project alternatives. It is assumed that, except as defined above in Task 1, supporting technical in formation will be provided by the City. The Admin Draft IS/EA will also include a discussion of Section 4(f) properties; however, it is anticipated that any impacts to Section 4(f) properties would result in a de minimus use finding.

Assembly Bill (AB) 52 requires a consultation proce ss with tribes that have previously identified them selves as having resources in the geographic area. If the City previously received such letters, this team will prepare letters to these tribes identifying the site location, describing the proje ct, and identifying the City’s contact person. If a tribe requests consultation, the City must start this consultation within 30 days of receiving the request and conclude the consultation before circulating the IS/EA for public review. This scope assumes that City staff will conduct any consultation.

We will submit the administrative draft IS/EA to th e City-designated planner for internal review and c omment prior to submitting to the federal agency for review. For th e purposes of this proposal, we expect two rounds o f review of the administrative draft IS/EA, one with the City and t he second with the federal agency. All comments pro vided will be addressed in tracked changes and comment bubbles indicating resolution for all issues.

Public Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment
Following revision of the administrative draft IS/E A, this team will provide a public draft IS/EA, inc luding the proposed MND which is the final copy/version of the document before it goes into reproduction for public review. The public draft IS/EA and MND will be submitted to the City and then the federal agency for review and comment. The IS/EA documents will be circulated. A Notice of Intent (NOI) and th e Notice of Completion (NOC) will be prepared and p osted with the County Clerk, State Clearinghouse, and local newspaper.

Final Draft Initial Study/Environmental Assessment
Following public review, this team will prepare a R esponse to Comments (RTC) document which will conta in copies of all comment letters received plus written responses to all comments. Responses will focus on comments that address the substance and technical adequacy of the IS/EA. We will provide responses with input from the City, federal agency and design team, as needed.

The completed screencheck draft Response to Comment s document will be submitted to the City and federa l agency for review and comment. This team will edit the Res ponse to Comments document upon receipt of the revi ew comments. Once all revisions have been made to the Response to Comments document, we will prepare the final draft IS/EA and submit it to the City and federal agency.

Our team will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring Plan listing adopted mitigation measures, if any, and identify the timing and entities responsible for implementing mitigation measures The final draft IS/EA will include identification o f the preferred alternative and a discussion of alt ernatives considered but eliminated from further discussion prior to the public draft IS/EA. The final draft IS/EA will contain a discussion and include a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) if the proj ect would result in a finding of adverse effect to historic

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

7 resources. If required, the final draft IS/EA will include an Only Practicable Finding explaining why there are no practicable avoidance alternatives, as well as a discussion of the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative and the rationale for its identification. It will a lso specify the Section 7 consultation outcome for each listed or endangered species. Upon completion of the final dr aft IS/EA, a copy of the final draft IS/EA, includi ng the MMRP, will be submitted to the City for review. Based on comments received from City staff, final revisions to the document will be made and the final draft IS/EA will be submitted to the federal agency for review.

Final Initial Study/Environmental Assessment
Upon completion of the final draft IS/EA review process with the federal agency, a Final IS/EA will be prepared. The Final IS/EA, as required by the federal agency, will be c irculated. Upon certification of the MND, a Notice of Determination will be prepared and filed with the State Clearingh ouse and the Riverside County Clerk. After the prep aration and circulation of the Final IS/EA, it is anticipated t hat a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) will be received from the federal agency.

Deliverables:
• Technical Reports to be provided as appendices to the IS/EA.

Draft and Final IS/EA in MS Word and PDF formats.
• Draft and Final RTC and MMRP in MS Word and PDF formats. • CEQA Compliance Notices (i.e., Notice of Completion, Notice of Determination, etc.). • Coordination and filing with the State Clearinghouse.

Assumptions:
• No fees are included for permits within this scope of services. Additionally, it is assumed all testi ng and field observations can be performed within existing right s of way and obtaining rights of entry or property access is excluded from this scope of services.
• This scope does not include CDFW and county clerk filing fees.

Task 4.0 – Reports & Calculations
Task 4.1 – Hydrology / Hydraulics Analysis
Mark Thomas will utilize Q3 Consulting, Inc. to provide engineering services to prepare a hydrology and hydraulic study in support of the proposed roadway extension. A lo cal hydrology analysis will be prepared for the roa dway improvements and the local offsite drainage areas tributary to the proposed storm drain facilities within Heacock Street.

Regional hydrology for the Perris Valley Line B cul vert improvements will be obtained from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC & WCD ). The local hydrology will be prepared following the guidelines in the Riverside County Hydrology Manual. A flood routing analysis will be prepared to evaluate, and design recommended drainage detention/retention basins in accordance with RCFC & WCD design requirements. Un it hydrographs will be prepared for the drainage areas tributary and downstream of the detention/retention basin to size the facility and identify peak flow rates for the d ownstream drainage facilities. Street flooded widt h, catch basin and storm drain hydraulics will be prepared using the results of the hydrology study.

Our team will provide engineering services for the preparation of a hydraulic analysis of the Perris Valley Line B Channel for the existing and project conditions to develop recommendations for the design of the Heacock Stree t bridge or culvert crossing. The design discharges for the analysis will be obtained from RCFC & WCD. An HEC-RAS hydraulic model will be prepared from the Indian Street crossing to upstream of Heacock Street within MARB. The limit s will be set to adequately assess the impacts of the proposed cross ing improvements. An existing condition model will be prepared

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

8 to document the baseline (pre-project} conditions. The model will be developed based on available top ographic mapping, as-built plans, and a field inspection of the channel. The proposed street improvements will be added to the baseline hydraulic model for the project condition analysis. The results of the analysis will be used to provide recommendations for the bridge/culvert design and t o document that the proposed improvements will not adversely impact the channel hydraulics. Street, storm drain , and channel hydraulics and design will be prepare d following the guidelines in the RCFC & WCD Hydraulic Design Manual. A hydrology and hydraulics report will be prepared to document the results of the analysis.

Task 4.2 – Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Assessment / Transportation Study VMT Assessment for Environmental Approval
Mark Thomas will work with the City to develop an approach to the environmental document. This is assumed to include a consistency finding with regional planning docume nts and VMT estimates using the County’s travel dem and model (RIVCOM). This scope of services assumes that the environmental document will conclude that the proje ct will not require mitigation. We will prepare a draft memora ndum outlining VMT results in post-construction con ditions and study findings to submit to the City. Upon complet ion of one (1) City review, we will update our find ings and respond to the comments with our final memorandum submittal to the City.

Transportation Study
Our team will study the following four intersections in the transportation study:
• Heacock Street & San Michele Road
• Heacock Street & Nandina Avenue
• Heacock Street & Lowe’s ADC 3459 Driveway
• Heacock Street/Webster Avenue & Harley Knox Boulevard We will also prepare 24-hour roadway segment forecasts at the following locations:
• Heacock Street (San Michele Road to Nandina Avenue)
• Heacock Street (Oleander Avenue to Harley Knox Boulevard • Webster Avenue (Harley Knox Boulevard to Nance Street) • Harley Knox Boulevard (Nevada Avenue to Heacock Street) • Harley Knox Boulevard (Heacock Street to Indian Street) We will collect traffic volume data during fair wea ther, while school is in session, and during a typi cal (non-holiday) Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday. Intersection peak period data will be collected during typical commute periods (7:00- 9:00 AM, 4:00-6:00 PM). Bicycle and pedestrian peak hour counts will be collected. The daily traffic c ounts (up to two 24-hour roadway counts) with vehicle classification (truck percentage) will be performed on the study roadway.

Forecasts will be prepared by applying the Differen ce Method, which adds traffic growth from RIVCOM ba se to future year models to existing counts, consistent with Nat ional Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 765.

The transportation study will include the following analysis scenarios:
• Existing Conditions
• Project Opening Year
• Project Design Year

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

9 Traffic counts can take up to three weeks to order and for the data vendor to return them. Once we hav e the traffic counts, we can complete the traffic forecasts within two weeks.

This scope of service assumes that the transportation study will conclude that signal modifications will not be necessary and only minor striping modifications will be neede d at the signalized intersection of Heacock Street & San Michele Road. This scope also assumes that the transportati on study will conclude that a traffic signal is not warranted at the unsignalized intersection of Heacock Street & Nandina Avenue.

Task 4.3 – Geotechnical Investigations
Geotechnical Investigation

Mark Thomas will utilize Earth Mechanics, Inc. (EMI ) to drill six 5 to 10 foot deep borings within the project limits. EMI will prepare a boring location plan and this plan w ill be used to secure encroachment permit from the City. No other permits are anticipated and are excluded. EMI field personnel will collect soil samples for laboratory testing, including bulk samples within 5 feet and small disturbed and relatively undisturbed ring samples of deeper soils . The small disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples w ill be collected using split-spoon samplers at a ve rtical interval of about 5 feet, alternating between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and the Modified California Drive (MCD) sampler. Samples of subsurface soils will be logged during the field investigation, secured in their containers or collected in plastic bags, and transported to the EMI laboratory.

Laboratory Testing
Field logs of the boreholes will be reviewed to sel ect representative soil samples for laboratory testing. Soil laboratory tests will be conducted in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) s tandards or California Test methods. Anticipated laboratory tests include: R-value, #200 wash, Atterberg Limits, and compaction.

Pavement Memorandum Preparation
Based on the R-value and the Traffic Index (TI) to be verified by the City, EMI will determine pavement structural sections.

EMI will prepare a technical memorandum to provide field and lab results and recommendations. EMI will address any comments resulting from the City of Moreno Valley review and prepare a final technical memorandum.

Preliminary Foundation Memorandum for Bridge
EMI will prepare a Preliminary Foundation Memorandum for the bridge, documenting the site geotechnical and geologic conditions. An idealized soil profile for foundatio n evaluation will be developed based on the existin g subsurface data obtained from the available subsurface information. EMI will provide preliminary seismic design parame ters (acceleration and response spectrum) using the latest Caltrans web-based seismic design criteria. Using the soil profile, EMI will provide preliminary foundation types for the proposed bridge widening.

Task 4.4 – Roundabout Performance Tests
Although the existing roundabout at Harley Knox Bou levard was designed for a northerly connection, we will include the following performance tests to verify the propo sed geometric layout will not impede operations to the existing roundabout:
• Roundabout geometry including design vehicle paths
• Fastest paths
• Horizontal sight distance
• Signing (placement, spacing, sign code, size)

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

10 Task 4.5 – Funding Assessment / Support
Mark Thomas will compile a list of available fundin g programs that apply to these project improvements , their requirements, timelines, local agency match requirements, and how the funding can be applied (i.e. R/W, Construction, Design, etc.) and generate a Funding Assessment tha t identifies recommendations on how to position eac h applicable source, the application process and schedule, and s pecial studies or considerations necessary to compl ete the application process.

Deliverables:
• Hydrology / Hydraulics Analysis.
• VMT Assessment Memorandum, Transportation Study.
• Pavement Memorandum, Preliminary Foundation Memorandum. • Roundabout Performance Tests.
• Funding Assessment.

Assumptions:
• RCFC & WCD will furnish regional hydrologic data tr ibutary to the Perris Valley Line B Channel. No reg ional hydrology will be performed as part of this task.
• Publicly available topography will be used for the local offsite hydrology and channel hydraulics. • Details of existing culverts and flood facilities in the project vicinity will be provided. • No modifications to FEMA floodplain mapping is included in the scope of work. • No fees for encroachment permits have been included within this scope of services. • It is assumed RIVCOM is the most appropriate model for use in forecasting for this project based upon our past experience and working with other agencies, should the City have other information we anticipate they will provide this data or instructions prior to commencing with traffic analysis and VMT assessment. • This scope of services assumes that the environment al document will conclude that the project will not require mitigation.
• Geotechnical core locations will be patched with ra pid set concrete with black dye to replace asphalt that is removed by excavations; no hot mix/sawcut repair.
• Site-specific traffic control plans are not require d for geotechnical investigations; WATCHBOOK will b e used for traffic control plans.
• This scope of services does not include preparation of grant funds, these services if necessary can be negotiated after identification of ideal grant funds.

Task 5.0 – Preliminary Engineering
Task 5.1 – Geometric Approval Drawings
We will prepare Geometric Approval Drawings (GADs) for one build alternative. Refinements will be made during between this submittal and the 65% design submittal based upon the City, City of Perris, MARB, and Mar ch JPA comments on said GADs. Layout plan sheets will be prepared at 1”=40’ and include major roadway infrastructure based upon PDT team input in prior meetings, and estimated drainage facilities needed for the project.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

11 Task 5.2 – Preliminary Cost Estimate
A cost estimate will be prepared to inform the City of the upcoming financial obligation and to provide an engineer’s estimate as a basis for the design based upon the GADs. The estimate will show quantities and unit prices for each work item along with appropriate mobilization and a 25% contingency cost. Construction costs will be developed using current bid results from similar projects, Caltrans database information and from Caltrans’ latest online database information.

Task 5.3 – Project Report
Mark Thomas will prepare a Project Report using the template providing in Appendix D of the Caltrans P roject Development Procedures Manual (PDPM). We will util ize the GADs, Preliminary Cost Estimate, Technical Studies and other available information as the basis of information for the Project Report.

Deliverables:
• GADs.
• Preliminary Cost Estimate.
• Project Report.

Assumptions:
• There will only be one (1) concurrent submittal of the GADs to the City, City of Perris, MARB, and Mar ch JPA.

Comments provided by the City of Perris, MARB, and March JPA will be reviewed with the City prior to commencement of the project report for concurrence with Project/City goals. Updates to the project geometry and proposed improvements based upon the agreed upon comments will be addressed in the 65% submittal. • The City of Moreno Valley will be the only reviewing and approving party for the Project Report.

Task 6.0 – Plans, Specifications & Estimates
Task 6.1 – Improvement Plans (65%, 90%, Final)
Mark Thomas will develop the following improvement plans for the 65%, 90%, and Final Submittals:
• Title Sheet (1 sheet)
• Construction Notes (1 sheet)
• Survey Control Plan (1 sheet)
• Typical Sections (
1 sheet)
• Construction Detail s (2 sheet s)
• Curb Ramp / Driveway Details (1 sheet)
• Demolition Plans (3 Sheets) (Double Stacked)
• Storm Drain / Drainage Plans (6 Sheets) 1" = 40'
• Detention Basin Grading Plans (2 sheets) 1" = 20'
• Layouts and Profiles (5 sheets) 1" = 40'
• Signing and Striping Plans (3 sheets) 1” =40’ (Double Stacked) • Lighting & Conduit Plans (3 Sheets) 1” =40’ (Double Stacked) Upon completion of and receiving comments from the City, City of Perris, RCFC & WCD, MARB, and March J PA at the 65% and 90% submittals, Mark Thomas will compile al l comments into a Comment Resolution Matrix. We wi ll meet with each agency to discuss comments to receive cla rity, work through conflicting comments, and establ ish a path

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

12 forward on addressing comments. Prior to advancing submittal packages, Mark Thomas will work with the City to ensure they are in agreement with all other agency comments.

Task 6.2 – Estimate (65%, 90%, Final)
A cost estimate will be prepared to inform the City of the upcoming financial obligation and to provide an engineer’s estimate as a basis for the design. The estimate will show quantities and unit prices for each work item along with appropriate mobilization and contingency costs. Construction costs will be developed using current bid results from similar projects, Caltrans database information and from Caltrans’ latest online database information. Submittals will be provided at 65%, 90%, and Final submittals.

Task 6.3 – Specifications (65%, 90%, Final)

We will prepare technical specifications and specia l provision package using the latest city boiler pl ates and applicable city format. We anticipate the City will provide th e boilerplate contract documents to be included in the specifications package. We will work with the City on assembling t he entire contract document package. Submittals wil l be provided at 65%, 90%, and Final submittals.

Deliverables:
• PS&E at 65%, 90% and Final Submittals .
• Comment Resolution Matrix (65% and 90% Submittals).
• Comment Resolution Meetings after 65% and 90% Submitta ls (2 meetings, 5 agencies).

Assumptions:
• Tasks exclude any lighting analysis or pedestrian scale lighting. • It was assumed the Perris Valley Channel Lateral B crossing Heacock Street will only be a replacement (or extension of the existing) reinforced concrete boxe s. No bridge improvements were included in this sc ope of services and we will utilize Caltrans Standard Plan s for the design of the reinforced concrete box imp rovements and headwalls.
• It was assumed no new traffic signal improvements or modifications were necessary for the project and that the existing signal equipment at the Heacock Street intersection would be protected in place. • It was assumed no planting or irrigation improvemen ts were required and were excluded from the scope o f services.
• Electrical services would be provided by the City o f Moreno Valley Electric Utilities and application/ plan check fees were not included within the scope of services.
• Submittals to the City of Perris, RCFC & WCD, MARB, and March JPA will occur concurrently with submittals to the City, Mark Thomas will not advance to the next submittal until receiving all comments and having a comment resolution meeting with each agency with jurisdiction.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

13 Task 7.0 – Right of Way Engineering
Task 7.1 – Right of Way Requirements / Legals & Plat Maps Mark Thomas will develop Right of Way Requirements Maps at 1”=40’ double stacked illustraRng exisRng and proposed right of way requirements including dimensions and area, and property ownerships. Mark Thomas will also prepare up to seven (7) legal descripRons and plat map exhibits for impacted properRes under the responsible charge of California Licensed Professional Land Surveyor.

Deliverables:
• Right of Way Requirements Maps, Legal Descriptions and Plat Map Exhibits (up to 7).

Assumptions:
• Legal Descriptions and Plat Map Exhibits for Temporary Construction Easements were not included.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

14 Optional Costs
Task 9.1 – Preliminary Title Reports (PTRs)
Utilizing Commonwealth Land Title Company, Mark Thomas will order up to seven (7) PTRs (each anticipated impacted property) for the basis of obtaining the vesting deed, verifying ownership, and identifying encumbrances / existing easements within acquisition area.

Deliverables:
• Preliminary Title Reports (up to 7).

Assumptions:
• Fee for PTRs is an estimate only for budgeting purp oses, Mark Thomas will secure costs from Commonweal th Land Title Company, Inc. prior to ordering for City approval. All invoices will be based upon actual costs.

Task 9.2 – Record of Survey
Should found cadaster / field data dictate the need to develop a record of survey per the California Land Surveyor’s Act (Business and Professions Code §§ 8700 – 8805) Section 8762, Mark Thomas will compile all boundary retracement data into a Pre-Construction Record of Survey to be filed with the Riverside County Surveyor. The ROS will show all lines and pertinent measurements/record documentation references delineated in the Land Net Base Map.

Deliverables:
• Pre-Construction Record of Survey Filed with the Riverside County Land Surveyor.

Assumptions:
• No new monumentation or replacement of missing monu ments / cadaster is included within this scope of services.

Task 9.3 – Utility Potholes (10)
Mark Thomas will utilize C-Below to conduct potholing of existing underground utilities to avoid conflicts with new storm drain improvements. Up to ten (10) potholes have been included.

Deliverables:
• .
• Potholes, Pothole Result Report.

Assumptions:
• It was assumed hot patch repair is not necessary, a ll potholes in the road will be filled with permane nt asphalt concrete/concrete patch repair with no cold mill.

Task 9.4 – Regulatory Permit Applications / Processing
Task 9.4.1 - CDFW 1600
This includes preparation of a 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreement permit application for the proposed project. This team will coordinate with the City for revisions and finalizing prior to submittal to CDFW for review, including coordination with CDFW assigned staff through permit negotiations and acquisitions.

Task 9.4.2 – USACE CWA 404
This includes preparation of a CWA 404 (NWP-14) permit application for Linear Transportation projects. This team will coordinate with the City for revisions and finalizing prior to submittal to the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) for review.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

15 Task 9.4.3 – RWQCB CWA 401
This includes preparation of a CWA, Section 401 Water Quality Certification permit application for the proposed project. This team will coordinate with the City for revisions and finalizing prior to submittal to RWQCB for review.

Task 9.4.4 – RCFC & WCD Encroachment Permit
This includes preparation of an encroachment permit application for work within the Perris Valley Channel Lateral B.

This team will coordinate with the City for revisions and finalizing prior to submittal to Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC & WCD) for review.

Deliverables:
• CDFW 1600 SAA
• CWA, Section 404, Nationwide Permit 14 - Linear Transportation Projects • CWA, Section 401 Water Quality Certification
• RCFC & WCD Encroachment Permit
Assumptions:
• Permit applications do not include any kind of agen cy fees (permit review, application, plan checking, etc.) and it is assumed the City will pay each agency directly after providing a request for payment, invoice, fee schedule, etc.
• This includes up to one (1) initial submittal and o ne (1) response to comments from each of the permit ting agencies.

Task 9.5 – Water Quality Management Plan
Mark Thomas will utilize Q3 to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the Heacock Street extension project using the Santa Ana Region template for Public Transportation Projects. The practicability of implementing structural LID BMPs within the right-of-way will be evaluated on the principles of the EPA Guidance.

Deliverables:
• Water Quality Management Plan.

Assumptions:
• N/A.

Task 9.6 – Bridge Replacement Feasibility Study
Task 9.6.1 - Borings and Foundation Report for Bridge
To support a potential feasibility study to evaluat e a single-span bridge versus a box culvert replace ment at the Perris Valley Strom Drain Lateral “B” intersection with He acock Street, we will update the Preliminary Founda tion Memorandum to include two additional 80-foot deep borings. Borings will be performed at existing roadbed elevations Task 9.6.2 – Bridge Replacement Feasibility Study
Should the existing dual 14’ wide by 9’ tall reinfo rced concrete box structure need replacement to increase capacity as a result of the regional hydraulics, Mark Thomas wi ll conduct a Bridge Replacement feasibility study t hat evaluates a single span bridge as the replacement in lieu of a large reinforced concrete box. This study is a planning level study and will include the development of a preliminary plan sheet showing the basic structure layout and items of work for each of the two alternatives. Additionally, a prelimina ry cost estimate will be included for each alternat ive that evaluates construction costs. Lastly, we will prepare a memorandum outlining our recommendations based on construction costs, impacts, and benefits for the City’s evaluation/determination for the structure type to be included in the final design.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

16 Deliverables:
• Final Foundation Memorandum with Boring Results
• Bridge Replacement Feasibility Study Memorandum
Assumptions:
• See Task 4 assumptions regarding no fee permits, only permits through the City, and traffic control. • No rights of entry or acquisition interests are included to perform work.

Task 9.7 – Infiltration Testing
To support a potential detention basin, we will per form one infiltration test. EMI will drill a boring and two temporary wells at the proposed location. Maximum targeted bo rehole depth is estimated to be 20 feet. Depth of t he wells will depend on the design invert elevation of the proposed basin but is assumed to be no more than 15 feet below existing ground. Sampling schedule will be at 5-foot interva ls in the soil boring. The two wells will not be sa mpled, though the soil type will be observed for comparison and documented in well logs. Each well will be soaked overnight and infiltration testing will commence the following day. Well infiltration testing will be performed following USBR 7300-89 method.

Deliverables:
• Soils Infiltration Testing Results.

Assumptions:
• See Task 4 assumptions regarding no fee permits, only permits through the City, and traffic control. • No rights of entry or acquisition interests are included to perform work.

Task 9.8 – Additional Legal Descriptions / Plat Map Exhibits for TCEs Mark Thomas will prepare legal descriptions and pla t map exhibits for all temporary construction easements under the responsible charge of California Licensed Professional Land Surveyor.

Deliverables:
• Legal Descriptions and Plat Map Exhibits (up to 4).

Assumptions:
• Legal Descriptions and Plat Map Exhibits for Temporary Construction Easements were not included.

Task 9.9 – Right of Way Acquisition
We have identified the following property impacts:

Ownership APNs R/W Interests
March Inland Port Airport
Authority 294-180-054 Permanent R/W.

Jose & Marth Perez 316-211-007 Permanent R/W and TCE for roadway grading.

First Industrial 316-211-001, 009, 010, 013 Permanen t R/W and TCE for roadway grading.

Lawrence Family Trust 316-211-014 Permanent R/W and T CE for roadway grading.

RCFC & WCD 316-211-016, 017, 302-020-037 Permanent R /W.

United States 294-180-047, 294-200-002,
314-153-072 Permanent R/W.

Carolyn Brazil & Carl Boyd 302-020-036, 051 Permanent R/W and TCE for roadway g rading.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

17 Task 9.9.1 – Appraisals / Review Appraisals
Mark Thomas will utilize Monument, Inc. to prepare seven (7) separately bound fee appraisal reports in compliance with USPAP and Uniform Act requirements for the partial acquisitions identified in the table above. The appraisal scope of work will generally include the following.
• The appraisal will be prepared by individuals licensed with the State of California, Office of Real Estate Appraisers, as a Certified General Real Estate Appraiser. Our appraisers both retain the requisite qualifications and experience necessary to competently complete appraisals in a competent and professional manner, in accordance with applicable laws and policies.
• Prepare the Notice of Decision to Appraiser letter for each property, advising the property owner of the proposed project, introducing the appraiser, enclosing an Acquisition Brochure describing the City’s acquisition process, and contract information to answer questions and concerns. • The appraisal report will comply with laws that are applicable to the specific appraisal assignment and the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). • Afford the property owner or the owner’s designated representative the opportunity to accompany the appraiser on the inspection of the property.
• Perform an inspection of the subject property. The inspection should be appropriate for the appraisal problem, and the Scope of Work should address:
o The extent of the inspection and description of the neighborhood and proposed project area, o The extent of the subject property inspection, including interior and exterior areas, o The level of detail of the description of the physical characteristics of the property being appraised (and, in the case of a partial acquisition, the remaining property). • In the appraisal report, identify the highest and best use. If highest and best use is in question or different from the existing use, provide an appropriate analysis identifying the market-based highest and best use. • Present and analyze relevant market information.
• In developing and reporting the appraisal, disregard any decrease or increase in the fair market value of the real property caused by the project for which the property is to be acquired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for the project.
• Report the appraiser’s analysis, opinions, and conclusions in the appraisal report. • A formal appraisal review will be completed on the United States property in anticipation of complying with federal regulations.

Task 9.9.2 – Negotiations
Our team will provide property acquisition services to secure the necessary right-of-way required to construct the Project. The tasks will be performed in accordance with applicable Federal, State and local regulations, and City’s ROW Policies and Procedures. Our team will be provided with a copy of City’s ROW Policies and Procedures Manual upon award and execution of a contract.

Our team will provide the following services under the direction of the City staff:
• Provide the Acquisition and Negotiations Services to acquire the property interests required for the Project in a timely, efficient manner and at a reasonable cost.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

18 • Coordinate and manage the acquisition process with the City, legal counsel, design team, property owners, and tenants along with the title company, appraisers and other consultants to insure effective cross-discipline communications.
• Review ROW plans, appraisal reports, title reports, appraisal maps and legal descriptions and all other pertinent documents.
• Prepare acquisition offer packages consisting of the City’s written purchase offer, appraisal summary statement, acquisition brochure, acquisition agreement, conveying instruments (Grant Deed, Permanent and/or Temporary Easements, etc.), Certificate of Acceptance, recommendation of Amount of Just Compensation, and plat maps and legal descriptions.
• Our team’s acquisition agent will meet personally with each property owner to present the City’s purchase offer, explain the project design requirement and inform him or her of the City’s ROW acquisition process. • Negotiate personally in good faith with each property owner, his/her agent or representative and discuss appraisal and valuation of the property interests, gather information from the property for consideration and address any questions or concerns that may arise during the acquisition process. • Establish and maintain an acquisition file for each property owner or property interest acquired and maintain a file checklist pursuant to the City’s specifications. • Promptly transmit executed documents (acquisition agreements, executed deeds, rental agreements, statements of information, offset statements, and the like) to the City for acceptance and processing. A report summarizing the pertinent information relative to the transaction will be included. • Prepare and submit a Letter of Recommendation to the City for any proposed administrative settlements with property owners. The letter will include a chronology of the negotiation efforts, provide supporting evidence and documentation and an explanation of the benefits and rationale behind the recommendation. • Recommend condemnation action when negotiations have reached an impasse. The required justification will be submitted in writing to the City. Our primary goal will be to reach an acceptance of the offer with each property owner. We will work with the City in recommending solutions to achieve acceptance of the offer. • Perform any other normal procedures and processes to implement the acquisition assignment and provide any other supporting information and/or correspondence required by the City. • Provide bilingual acquisition agents, if necessary.
• Prepare all applicable forms, secure property owner’s approval and signature and submit the forms to the City for review and acceptance.
• Upon completion of the acquisition process for each property or property interest, or at project completion, our team will provide the City with the original acquisition file as well as electronic copy of files for future audit purposes.

Task 9.9.3 – Escrow Coordination
After an offer is accepted and the purchase agreement is approved by the City, our team’s Escrow Coordinator will transmit the original documents to the escrow company and request that the title company send an updated Preliminary Title Report (to be provided by the City).
• The Escrow Coordinator will review the updated title report and prepare a memorandum of disapproved title exceptions.

SCOPE OF SERVICES HEACOCK STREET SOUTH EXTENSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 801 0010
City of Moreno Valley

19 • The escrow company will prepare escrow instructions, transmit a copy of the purchase contract to the title company and begin the process of satisfying all monetary liens, prorating taxes and clearing adverse title exceptions and encumbrances.
• Upon escrow’s request for funds from the City, the estimated closing amount will be deposited in escrow, and upon close, the escrow holder will record a deed and issue a title insurance policy. • The Escrow Coordinator will provide ongoing support to the escrow officer to ensure the timely execution of escrow instructions, coordination of title clearance documents and processing of wire transfers. • Escrow closure generally will be accomplished in 30 to 60 days.

Deliverables:
• Appraisal Reports (up to 7), Review Appraisal Reports (up to 1). • Negotiation Services for up to 7 larger parcels.
• Escrow Coordination Services for up to 7 larger parcels.

Task 10.0 – Bidding & Support During Construction
Task 10.1 – Bidding Support
Mark Thomas will provide assistance, as required, to the City during bidding of the project. The work may include answering questions from prospective bidders, assisting the City in the preparation of addenda to the PS&E during the advertisement period, providing consultation and interpretation of the construction documents, and attending pre-bid meeting. Mark Thomas has provided a “budget” amount to be used on a time and materials basis as requested by the City. Any time spent beyond this budget will require a contract amendment.

Task 10.2 – Design Support During Construction
Mark Thomas will provide assistance, as required, to the City during construction of the project. The work may include reviewing cost proposal from contractors and making recommendations, review construction materials submittals, conducting job walk, and responding to RFIs. Mark Thomas has provided a “budget” amount to be used on a time and materials basis as requested by the City. Any time spent beyond this budget will require a contract amendment.

Task 10.3 – As-Built Preparation
Mark Thomas will prepare as-built plans to show the changes made to the construction plans during construction.

Deliverables:
• Responses to Bidding Questions (10), Prepare Addenda (1), Attend Pre-bid Meeting (1). • Conformed Construction Improvement PS&Es.
• Review Construct Materials Submittals (up to 5), Conduct Job Walk (up to 1), Response to Construction RFIs (up to 10).
• Prepare As-Built Plans
Assumptions:
• Either the City staff or their Construction Management consultant will provide detailed redlines and instructions of as-built conditions prior to Mark Thomas develop ment final as-builts. Our as-builts will be based upon said redlines and/or instructions, and RFI's or submittals answered during the construction phase.

CADD

DRAWINGS

IRVINE
2121 Alton Parkway, Suite 210
Irvine, CA 92606
(949) 477-9000
San José • Cupertino • Walnut Creek
Fresno • Inland Empire • Irvine
Lakewood • Oakland • Roseville
Sacramento
markthomas.com

EXHIBIT “C”

CITY - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED

TO CONSULTANT

1. Furnish the Consultant all in- house data which is pertinent to services to be performed by the Consultant and which is within the custody or control of the City, including, but not limited to, copies of record and off-record maps and other record and off -record property data, right -of-way maps and other r ight-of-way data, pending or proposed subject property land division and development application data, all newly developed and pertinent design and project specification data, and such other pertinent data which may become available to the City.

2. Provide timely review, processing, and reasonably expeditious approval of all submittals by the Consultant.

3. Provide timely City staff liaison with the Consultant when requested and when reasonably needed.

EXHIBIT “D”

TERMS OF PAYMENT

1. The Consultant's compensation shall not exceed $ 894,547.00 .

2. The Consultant will obtain, and keep current during the term of this Agreement, the required City of Moreno Valley business license. Proof of a current City of Moreno Valley business license will be required prior to any payments by the City. Any invoice not paid because the proof of a current City of Moreno Valley b usiness license has not been provided will not incur any fees, late charges, or other penalties. Complete instructions for obtaining a City of Moreno Valley b usiness license are located at: http://www.moval.org/biz-lic.

3. The Consultant will electronically submit an invoice to the City along with documentation evidencing services completed to date as specified in the Request for Proposal. Progress payments will be made in accordance with the payment schedule outlined in the Request for Proposal, but in no case will progress payments be made to the Consultant more frequently than once per month. The progress payment is based on actual time and materials expended in furnishing authorized professional services during the preceding calendar month. At no time will the City pay for more services than have been satisfactorily completed and the City Engineer’s determination of the amount due for any progress payment shall be final. The consultant will submit all original invoices to Accounts Payable staff at [email protected]
. Accounts Payable questions can be directed to
(951) 413-3130.

4. The Consultant agrees that City payments will be received via Automated Clearing House (ACH) Direct Deposit and that the required ACH Authorization form will be

completed prior to any payments by the City. Any invoice not paid because the completed ACH Authorization Form has not been provided will not incur any fees, late charges, or other penalties. The ACH Authorization Form is located at:
http://www.moval.org/city_hall/forms.shtml#bf

5. The minimum information required on all invoices is:

A. Vendor Name, Mailing Address, and Phone Number
B. Invoice Date
C. Vendor Invoice Number
D. City-provided Reference Number (e.g. Project, Activity) E. Detailed work hours by class title (e.g. Manager, Technician, or Specialist), services performed and rates, explicit portion of a contract amount , or detailed billing information that is sufficient to justify the invoice amount ; single, lump amounts without detail are not acceptable.

6. The City shall pay the Consultant for all invoiced, authorized professional services within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice for same.

Principal
Sr. Technical Lead
Sr. Project Manager
Technical Lead
Sr. Technical Engineer
Project Engineer
Sr. Technician
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
Survey Manager I
Project Surveyor I
Lead Survey Technician
Survey Technician I
Funding Manager
Funding Specialist
Sr. Project Accountant
Sr. Project Coordinator
PLACEWORKS, INC.

Q3 CONSULTING, INC.

EARTH MECHANICS, INC.

FEHR & PEERS, INC.

MONUMENT, INC.
$465 $318 $300 $286 $236 $185 $173 $155 $128 $257 $205 $179 $131 $318 $186 $188 $182 Non-DBE Non-DBE DBE Non-DBE DBE

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT / ADMINISTRATION

1.1 Project Administration 4 56 112 20 28 28 248 $52,289 - - - - - $52,289

1.2 Project Team Meetings 2 16 48 66 $14,610 - - - - - $14,610

1.3 Quality Control & Quality Assurance (QC/QA) 4 16 48 68 $20,369 - - - - - $20,369 Subtotal Phase 1 10 0 88 48 0 160 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 382 $87,268 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $87,268

2.0 RESEARCH & FIELD INVESTIGATIONS

2.1 Field Investigations / Site Photographs 4 16 20 $2,788 - - - - - $2,788

2.2 Record Maps / As-Built Research 8 40 4 40 92 $12,669 - - - - - $12,669

2.3 SURVEY

2.3.1 Control 2 8 18 $5,387 - - - - - $5,387

2.3.2 Boundary Retracement 4 16 52 $17,241 - - - - - $17,241

2.3.3 Topographic Survey 2 8 4 8 80 190 $50,749 - - - - - $50,749

2.4 UTILITIES

2.4.1 Introductory Letters 2 20 22 $2,930 - - - - - $2,930

2.4.2 Utility Base Maps 2 48 50 $6,514 - - - - - $6,514

2.4.3 Utility Coordination 4 12 72 88 $12,636 - - - - - $12,636 Subtotal Phase 2 0 0 4 0 0 30 0 0 196 14 32 8 120 0 0 0 0 532 $110,914 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,914

3.0 NEPA/CEQA COMPLIANCE

3.1 Coordination / Management 8 20 8 36 $7,553 $27,071 - - - - $34,624

3.2 Project Description 8 40 48 $9,800 - - - - - $9,800

3.3 Technical Analysis 0 $0 $96,811 - - - - $96,811

3.4 CEQA/NEPA Environmental Analysis 0 $0 $66,565 - - - - $66,565 Subtotal Phase 3 0 0 16 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 84 $17,353 $190,447 $0 $0 $0 $0 $207,800

4.0 REPORTS & CALCULATIONS

4.1 Hydrology & Hydraulic Analysis 2 8 20 30 $4,640 - $74,000 - - - $78,640

4.2 Traffic Operations / VMT Assessment 2 8 10 $2,080 - - - $41,000 - $43,080

4.3 Geotechnical Investigations 2 4 6 $1,340 - - $19,604 - - $20,944

4.4 Roundabout Performance Tests 2 8 24 34 $5,800 - - - $8,000 - $13,800

4.5 Funding Assessment / Support 12 36 48 $10,508 - - - - - $10,508 Subtotal Phase 4 0 0 8 0 0 28 0 24 20 0 0 0 0 12 36 0 0 128 $24,368 $0 $74,000 $19,604 $49,000 $0 $166,972

5.0 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING

5.1 Geometric Approval Drawings 12 32 32 100 176 $27,280 - - - - - $27,280

5.2 Preliminary Cost Estimate 2 8 20 30 $4,640 - - - - - $4,640

5.3 Project Report 8 20 28 $6,100 - - - - - $6,100 Subtotal Phase 5 0 0 22 0 0 60 0 32 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 $38,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,020

6.0 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS & ESTIMATES

6.1 Improvement Plans (65%, 90%, Final) 40 292 456 388 4 4 1184 $187,708 - - - $12,000 - $199,708

6.2 Estimate (65%, 90%, Final) 8 28 60 96 $15,260 - - - - - $15,260

6.3 Specifications (65%, 90%, Final) 16 60 76 $15,900 - - - - - $15,900 Subtotal Phase 6 0 0 64 0 0 380 0 456 448 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 1356 $218,868 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $230,868

7.0 RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING

7.1 Right of Way Requirements/Legals & Plats 8 36 100 4 28 80 256 $42,902 - - - - - $42,902 Subtotal Phase 7 0 0 8 0 0 36 0 0 100 4 28 80 0 0 0 0 0 256 $42,902 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,902 TOTAL HOURS 10 0 210 48 0 754 0 512 904 18 64 88 124 12 36 28 36 2972 Anticipated Salary Increases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER DIRECT COSTS $900 $1,385 $1,000 $6,518 $0 $0 $9,803 TOTAL COST $4,650 $0 $63,000 $13,709 $0 $139,490 $0 $79,360 $115,712 $4,631 $13,104 $15,708 $16,275 $3,818 $6,691 $5,263 $6,539 $540,593 $191,832 $75,000 $26,122 $61,000 $0 $894,547 COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT BASE SCOPE: Heacock Street South Extension (City Project Number 801 0100)

TOTAL COST
Subconsultants
Total
Hours
Total MT
Cost
Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only.

See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges. 5/30/2024

OPTIONAL TASKS

9.1 PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS (7) 32 32 $6,552 - - - - $8,500 $15,052

9.2 RECORD OF SURVEY 4 24 8 40 76 $12,621 - - - - - $12,621

9.3 UTILITY POTHOLES (10) 2 8 40 4 54 $7,927 - - - - - $7,927

9.4 REGULATORY PERMIT APPLICATION / PROCESSING

9.4.1 CDFW 1600 2 8 12 22 $3,616 $7,500 - - - - $11,116

9.4.2 USACE CWA 404 2 20 24 46 $7,372 $7,500 - - - - $14,872

9.4.3 RWQCB CWA 401 2 8 12 22 $3,616 $7,500 - - - - $11,116

9.4.4 RCFC & WCD Encroachment Permit 2 20 24 46 $7,372 - - - - - $7,372

9.5 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2 12 40 54 $7,940 - $23,232 - - - $31,172

9.6 BRIDGE FEASIBILITY STUDY

9.6.1 Borings and Foundation Report for Bridge 0 $0 - - $22,060 - - $22,060

9.6.2 Bridge Feasibility Study 20 20 60 48 40 40 60 288 $56,228 - - - - - $56,228

9.7 INFILTRATION TESTING 0 $0 - - 8,502 - - $8,502

9.8 ADDITIONAL LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS / PLAT MAPS (4) 42 70 112 $17,787 - - - - - $17,787

9.9 RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION

9.9.1 Appraisals / Review Appraisals 4 4 8 $1,467 - - - - $43,800 $45,267

9.9.2 Negotiations 4 4 $740 - - - - $40,500 $41,240

9.9.3 Escrow Coordination 0 $0 - - - - $7,360 $7,360

10.0 BIDDING AND SUPPORT DURING CONSTRUCTION

10.1 Bidding Support 4 16 20 $4,160 - - - $750 - $4,910

10.2 Design Support During Construction 8 36 40 84 $14,180 - - - $3,750 - $17,930

10.3 As-Built Preparation 12 12 40 64 $10,940 - - - $3,500 - $14,440 Subtotal Optional Tasks 0 20 32 0 60 124 40 40 212 4 98 8 110 0 0 0 4 752 $131,031 $22,500 $23,232 $30,562 $0 $8,500 $215,825 TOTAL HOURS - OPTIONAL 0 20 56 0 60 196 40 40 292 4 98 8 110 0 0 0 8 932 Anticipated Salary Increases $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER DIRECT COSTS - OPTIONAL $30,000 $500 $500 $15,804 $0 $0 $46,804 TOTAL COST - OPTIONAL $0 $6,363 $16,800 $0 $14,175 $36,260 $6,930 $6,200 $37,376 $1,029 $20,066 $1,428 $14,438 $0 $0 $0 $1,453 $192,517 $23,000 $23,732 $46,366 $8,000 $100,160 $393,775 COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT OPTIONAL SCOPE: Heacock Street South Extension (City Project Number 801 0100) Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only.

See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges. 6/3/2024
(NOT A PART)

EXHIBIT “E”

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Minimum Scope of Insurance

Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. The most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01, which shall include insurance for “bodily injury,” “property damage” and “personal and advertising injury” with coverage for premises and operations, products and completed operations, and contractual liability.

2. The most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, which shall include coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1- Any Auto).

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the California Labor Code and Employer’s Liability Insurance.

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession.

Minimum Limits of Insurance

Consultant shall maintain limits of liability of not less than:

1. General Liability:

$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury $2,000,000 aggregate for products and completed operations $2,000,000 general aggregate

2. Automobile Liability:

$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage

3. Employer’s Liability:

$1,000,000 each accident for bodily injury
$1,000,000 disease each employee
$1,000,000 disease policy limit

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions):

$1,000,000 per claim/occurrence
$2,000,000 policy aggregate

Umbrella or Excess Insurance

In the event Consultant purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the “Minimum Limits of Insurance,” this insurance policy(ies) shall “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies).

Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions

Consultant shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policy(ies) required hereunder and Consultant shall also be responsible for payment of any self- insured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects The City of Moreno Valley, the City of Moreno Valley Community Services District, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority , and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers; or (ii) Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to the City Manager or his/her designee, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or self-insured retentions.

Other Insurance Provisions

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

1. The City of Moreno Valley, the City of Moreno Valley Community Services District, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority , and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds.

2. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Moreno Valley , the City of Moreno Valley Community Services District, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.

3. Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City.

The Workers’ Compensation insurance policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provision: Consultant and its insurer shall waive any right of subrogation against the City of Moreno Valley, the City of Moreno Valley Community Services District, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.

If the Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance policy is written on a claims-m ade

form:

1. The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 3 years after any expiration or termination of the Agreement or, in the alternative, the policy shall be endorsed to provide not less than a 3-year discovery period.

3. If coverage is canceled or non- renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant, Consultant must purchase extended reporting coverage for a minimum of 3 years following the expiration or termination of the Agreement.

4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review.

5. These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Agreement.

All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non- renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Consultant shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Consultant shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

Acceptability of Insurers
All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be placed with an insurance company(ies) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California and rated not less than “A-VII” in Best’s Insurance Rating Guide; or authorized by the City Manager or his/her designee.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received and approved by the City Manager or his/her designee prior to City’s execution of the Agreement and before work commences.

Moreno Valley City CouncilAugust 20, 2024

Moreno Valley City Council
August 20, 2024