Moreno Valley Business Park –
Phase II
GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
PREPARED BY:
Haseeb Qureshi
[email protected]
Alyssa Barnett
[email protected]
JANUARY 17, 2022
14397-05 GHG Report
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. I
APPENDICES II
LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................................. II LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................. III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 9 ES.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 9 ES.2 Project Requirements ................................................................................................................... 9 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 12
1.1 Site Location ................................................................................................................................ 12
1.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................... 12 2 CLIMATE CHANGE SETTING ....................................................................................................... 16
2.1 Introduction to Global Climate Change (GCC) ............................................................................ 16
2.2 Global Climate Change Defined .................................................................................................. 16
2.3 GHGs ........................................................................................................................................... 16
2.4 Global Warming Potential ........................................................................................................... 23
2.5 GHG Emissions Inventories ......................................................................................................... 23
2.6 Effects of Climate Change in California ....................................................................................... 25
2.7 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................................................... 27
2.8 City of Moreno Valley ................................................................................................................. 48 3 PROJECT GHG IMPACT .............................................................................................................. 51
3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 51
3.2 Standards of Significance ............................................................................................................ 51
3.3 Models Employed To Analyze GHGs ........................................................................................... 52
3.4 Life-Cycle Analysis Not Required ................................................................................................ 52
3.5 Construction Emissions ............................................................................................................... 53
3.6 Operational Emissions ................................................................................................................ 55
3.7 GHG Emissions Findings and Recommendations ........................................................................ 58 4 R
EFERENCES .............................................................................................................................. 69 5 CERTIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 73
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
ii
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 3.1: CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.2: CALEEMOD MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.3: CALEEMOD WAREHOUSING OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 3.4: CALEEMOD HIGH-CUBE COLD STORAGE OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP ............................................................................................................ 13 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN...................................................................................................................... 14 EXHIBIT 2-A: SUMMARY OF PROJECTED GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT, 2070-2099 (AS COMPARED WITH 1961-1990) .................................................................................................................. 22
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................. 9 TABLE 2-1: GHGS ................................................................................................................................ 17 TABLE 2-2: GWP AND ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME OF SELECT GHGS ........................................................ 23 TABLE 2-3: TOP GHG PRODUCING COUNTRIES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION ...................................... 24 TABLE 2-4: 2018 GHG EMISSIONS (MTCO2E/YR) ................................................................................. 25 TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION DURATION .............................................................................................. 53 TABLE 3-3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................... 54 TABLE 3-4: AMORTIZED ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS ........................................................... 54 TABLE 3-5: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX .............................................................................................. 56 TABLE 3-6: TRUCK FLEET MIX ............................................................................................................. 57 TABLE 3-7: PROJECT SCENARIO GHG EMISSIONS ................................................................................ 58 TABLE 3-8: 2017 SCOPING PLAN CONSISTENCY SUMMARY ................................................................. 59 TABLE 3-9: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY .................................................. 64 TABLE 3-10: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ................................................ 65
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
°C Degrees Celsius
°F Degrees Fahrenheit
(1) Reference
2017 Scoping Plan Final 2017 Scoping Plan Update
AB Assembly Bill
AB 32 Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
AB 1493 Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards
AB 1881 California Water Conservation Landscaping Act of 2006 Annex I Industrialized Nations
APA Administrative Procedure Act
AQIA Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Air Quality Impact Analysis
BAU Business as Usual
C2F6 Hexafluoroethane
C2H6 Ethane
C2H2F4 Tetrafluroethane
C2H4F2 Ethylidene Fluoride
CAA Federal Clean Air Act
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency
CAL FIRE California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CALGAPS California LBNL GHG Analysis of Policies Spreadsheet CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code
CalSTA California State Transportation Agency
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAP Climate Action Plan
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resource Board
CAS Climate Action Strategy
CBSC California Building Standards Commission
CEC California Energy Commission
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA Guidelines 2019 CEQA Statute and Guidelines
CDFA California Department of Food and Agriculture
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
iv
CF4 Tetrafluoromethane
CFC Chlorofluorocarbons
CFC-113 Trichlorotrifluoroethane
CH4 Methane
City City of Moreno Valley
CNRA California Natural Resources Agency
CNRA 2009 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
Convention United Nation’s Framework Convention on Climate Change COP Conference of the Parties
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
CTC California Transportation Commission
DOF Department of Finance
DWR Department of Water Resources
EMFAC Emission Factor Model
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EV Electric Vehicle
FED Functional Equivalent Document
GCC Global Climate Change
Gg Gigagram
GHGA Greenhouse Gas Analysis
GO-Biz Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development gpd Gallons Per Day
gpm Gallons Per Minute
GWP Global Warming Potential
H2O Water
HFC Hydrofluorocarbons
HDT Heavy-Duty Trucks
HFC-23 Fluoroform
HFC-134a 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane
HFC-152a 1,1-difluoroethane
HHDT Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks
hp Horsepower
IBANK California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IRP Integrated Resource Planning
ISO Independent System Operator
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
v
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
kWh Kilowatt Hours
lbs Pounds
LBNL Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
LCA Life-Cycle Analysis
LCD Liquid Crystal Display
LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard or Executive Order S-01-07 LDA Light-Duty Auto
LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks
LEV III Low-Emission Vehicle
LHDT1/LHDT2 Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks
LULUCF Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry
MCY Motorcycles
MD Medium Duty
MDT Medium-Duty Trucks
MDV Medium-Duty Vehicles
MHDT Medium-Heavy-Duty Tucks
MMR Mandatory Reporting Rule
MMTCO2e Million Metric Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent mpg Miles Per Gallon
MPOs Metropolitan Planning Organizations
MMTCO2e/yr Million Metric Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Per Year MT/yr Metric Tons Per Year
MTCO2e Metric Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
MTCO2e/yr Metric Ton of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent Per Year MW Megawatts
MWh Megawatts Per Hour
MWELO California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient
N2O Nitrous Oxide
NDC Nationally Determined Contributions
NF3 Nitrogen Trifluoride
NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health NOX Nitrogen Oxides
Non-Annex I Developing Nations
OAL Office of Administrative Law
OPR Office of Planning and Research
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
vi
PFC Perfluorocarbons
ppb Parts Per Billion
ppm Parts Per Million
ppt Parts Per Trillion
Project Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II
RTP Regional Transportation Plan
SAFE Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule
SB Senate Bill
SB 32 California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
SB 375 Regional GHG Emissions Reduction Targets/Sustainable Communities Strategies
SB 1078 Renewable Portfolio Standards
SB 1368 Statewide Retail Provider Emissions Performance Standards
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SCE Southern California Edison
Scoping Plan California Air Resources Board Climate Change Scoping Plan SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy
sf Square Feet
SF
6 Sulfur Hexaflouride
SGC Strategic Growth Council
SLPS Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy
SP Service Population
SR-60 State Route 60
SWCRB State Water Resources Control Board
TA Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II (DPR20-00004) Traffic Analysis
TDM Transportation Demand Measures
Title 20 Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards
Title 24 California Building Code
U.N. United Nations
U.S. United States
UNFCCC United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change URBEMIS Urban Emissions
UTR Utility Tractors
VFP Vehicle Fueling Positions
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
vii
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
WCI Western Climate Initiative
WRCOG Western Riverside Council of Governments
WRI World Resources Institute
ZE/NZE Zero and Near-Zero Emissions
ZEV Zero-Emissions Vehicles
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
viii
This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 S UMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis (GHGA) is summarized below based on the significance criteria in Section 3 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines ( CEQA Guidelines (1).
Table ES-1 shows the findings of significance for potential greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts under CEQA.
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
GHG Impact #1: Would the Project generate
GHG emissions either directly or indirectly,
that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
3.7 Less Than Significant n/a
GHG Impact #2: Would the Project conflict
with an applicable plan, policy or regulation
adopted for the purpose of reducing the
emissions of GHGs?
3.7 Less Than Significant n/a
ES.2 P ROJECT REQUIREMENTS
The Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the State of California and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) aimed at the reduction of air pollutant emissions. Those that are directly and indirectly applicable to the Project and that would assist in the reduction of GHG emissions include:
• Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill (AB) 32) (2). • Regional GHG Emissions Reduction Targets/Sustainable Communities Strategies (Senate Bill (SB) 375) (3).
• Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards (AB 1493). Establishes fuel efficiency ratings for new vehicles (4). • California Building Code (Title 24 California Code of Regulations (CCR)) and CALGreen standards.
Establishes energy efficiency requirements for new construction (5). • Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20 CCR). Establishes energy efficiency requirements for appliances (6).
• Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). Requires carbon content of fuel sold in California to be 10 percent (%) less by 2020 (7).
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
10 • California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881). Requires local agencies to adopt the Department of Water Resources updated Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance or equivalent by January 1, 2010, to ensure efficient landscapes in new development and reduced water waste in existing landscapes (8).
• Statewide Retail Provider Emissions Performance Standards (SB 1368). Requires energy generators to achieve performance standards for GHG emissions (9). • Renewable Portfolio Standards (SB 1078 – also referred to as RPS). Requires electric corporations to increase the amount of energy obtained from eligible renewable energy resources to 20 % by 2010 and 33% by 2020 (10).
• California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (SB 32). Requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030, a reduction target that was first introduced in Executive Order B-30-15 (11).
Promulgated regulations that will affect the Project’s emissions are accounted for in the Project’s GHG calculations provided in this report. In particular, AB 1493, LCFS, and RPS, are accounted for in the Project’s emission calculations.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
11 This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
12 1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the GHGA prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for the proposed Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II (Project). The purpose of this GHGA is to evaluate Project-related construction and operational emissions and determine the level of GHG impacts as a result of constructing and operating the Project.
1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed project is located northerly of State Route 60 ( SR-60) at Heacock Street in the northwesterly portion of the City of Moreno Valley , in western Riverside County. The Project considered herein comprises approximately 9.98 acres within Specific Plan No. 205, located immediately southeasterly of Ironwood Avenue at Heacock Street, as shown on Exhibit 1-A.
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project is proposed to consist of a single 220,390 square feet (sf) industrial building (Building 5) which will be evaluated assuming 154,270 sf of warehousing use (70% of the overall sf), 33,060 sf of manufacturing use (15% of the overall sf), and 33,060 sf of high-cube cold storage warehouse use (15% of the overall sf) for a total of 220,390 sf of industrial uses. A preliminary site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 1-B.
It is expected that the Project business operations would primarily be conducted within the enclosed buildings, except for traffic movement, parking, as well as loading and unloading of trucks at designated loading bays. This analysis includes a conservative assumption of on- site Project-related emission sources for potential future tenants, including architectural coatings, consumer products, landscape maintenance equipment, natural gas, electricity, mobile operations, and on -site cargo handling equipment. This analysis is intended to describe GHG impacts associated with the expected typical operational activities at the Project site. To present a conservative approach, this report assumes the Project would operate 24-hours daily for seven days per week.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
13 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
14 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
15 This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
16 2 CLIMATE CHANGE SETTING
2.1 INTRODUCTION TO GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE (GCC)
GCC is defined as the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, precipitation, and storms. The majority of scientists believe that the climate shift taking place since the Industrial Revolution is occurring at a quicker rate and magnitude than in the past. Scientific evidence suggests that GCC is the result of increased concentrations of GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere, including carbon dioxide (CO 2), methane (CH 4), nitrous oxide (N 2O), and fluorinated gases. The majority of scientists believe that this increased rate of climate change is the result of GHGs resulting from human activity and industrialization over the past 200 years.
An individual project like the proposed Project evaluated in this GHGA cannot generate enough GHG emissions to affect a discernible change in global climate. However, the proposed Project may participate in the potential for GCC by its incremental contribution of GHGs combined with the cumulative increase of all other sources of GHGs, which when taken together constitute potential influences on GCC. Because these changes may have serious environmental consequences, Section 3.0 will evaluate the potential fo r the proposed Project to have a significant effect upon the environment as a result of its potential contribution to the greenhouse effect.
2.2 GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE DEFINED
GCC refers to the change in average meteorological conditions on the earth with respect to temperature, wind patterns, precipitation, and storms. Global temperatures are regulated by naturally occurring atmospheric gases such as water vapor, CO 2, N2O, CH4, hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF 6). These particular gases are important due to their residence time (duration they stay) in the atmosphere, which ranges from 10 years to more than 100 years. These gases allow solar radiation into the earth’s atmosphere, but prevent radioactive heat from escaping, thus warming the earth’s atmosphere. GCC can occur naturally as it has in the past with the previous ice ages.
Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere are often referred to as GHGs. GHGs are released into the atmosphere by both natural and anthropogenic activity. Without the natural GHG effect, the earth’s average temperature would be approximately 61 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) cooler than it is currently. The cumulative accumulation of these gases in the earth’s atmosphere is considered to be the cause for the observed increase in the earth’s temperature.
2.3 GHGS
2.3.1 GHGS AND HEALTH EFFECTS
GHGs trap heat in the atmosphere, creating a GHG effect that results in global warming and climate change. Many gases demonstrate these properties and as discussed in Table 2-1. For the purposes of this analysis, emissions of CO 2, CH4, and N2O were evaluated (see Table 3 -1 later in this report) because these gases are the primary contributors to GCC from development projects.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
17 Although there are other substances such as fluorinated gases that also contribute to GCC, these fluorinated gases were not evaluated as their sources are not well- defined and do not contain accepted emissions factors or methodology to accurately calculate these gases.
TABLE 2-1: GHGS
GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
Water Water is the most abundant,
important, and variable GHG in
the atmosphere. Water vapor is
not considered a pollutant; in
the atmosphere it maintains a
climate necessary for life.
Changes in its concentration are
primarily considered to be a
result of climate feedbacks
related to the warming of the
atmosphere rather than a direct
result of industrialization.
Climate feedback is an indirect,
or secondary, change, either
positive or negative, that occurs
within the climate system in
response to a forcing
mechanism. The feedback loop
in which water is involved is
critically important to projecting
future climate change.
As the temperature of the
atmosphere rises, more water is
evaporated from ground storage
(rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil).
Because the air is warmer, the
relative humidity can be higher
(in essence, the air is able to
‘hold’ more water when it is
warmer), leading to more water
vapor in the atmosphere. As a
GHG, the higher concentration of
water vapor is then able to
absorb more thermal indirect
energy radiated from the Earth,
thus further warming the
atmosphere. The warmer
atmosphere can then hold more
water vapor and so on and so
on. This is referred to as a
“positive feedback loop.” The
extent to which this positive
feedback loop would continue is
The main source of
water vapor is
evaporation from
the oceans
(approximately
85%). Other sources
include evaporation
from other water
bodies, sublimation
(change from solid to
gas) from sea ice and
snow, and
transpiration from
plant leaves.
There are no known direct
health effects related to
water vapor at this time. It
should be noted however
that when some pollutants
react with water vapor, the
reaction forms a transport
mechanism for some of
these pollutants to enter the
human body through water
vapor.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
18 GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
unknown as there are also
dynamics that hold the positive
feedback loop in check. As an
example, when water vapor
increases in the atmosphere,
more of it would eventually
condense into clouds, which are
more able to reflect incoming
solar radiation (thus allowing
less energy to reach the earth’s
surface and heat it up) (13).
CO2 CO2 is an odorless and colorless
GHG. Since the industrial
revolution began in the mid-
1700s, the sort of human activity
that increases GHG emissions
has increased dramatically in
scale and distribution. Data from
the past 50 years suggests a
corollary increase in levels and
concentrations. As an example,
prior to the industrial revolution,
CO
2 concentrations were fairly
stable at 280 parts per million
(ppm). Today, they are around
370 ppm, an increase of more
than 30%. Left unchecked, the
concentration of CO
2 in the
atmosphere is projected to
increase to a minimum of 540
ppm by 2100 as a direct result of
anthropogenic sources (14).
CO2 is emitted from
natural and
manmade sources.
Natural sources
include: the
decomposition of
dead organic matter;
respiration of
bacteria, plants,
animals, and fungus;
evaporation from
oceans; and volcanic
outgassing.
Anthropogenic
sources include: the
burning of coal, oil,
natural gas, and
wood. CO
2 is
naturally removed
from the air by
photosynthesis,
dissolution into
ocean water,
transfer to soils and
ice caps, and
chemical weathering
of carbonate rocks
(15).
Outdoor levels of CO
2 are not
high enough to result in
negative health effects.
According to the National
Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH)
high concentrations of CO
2 can result in health effects
such as: headaches,
dizziness, restlessness,
difficulty breathing,
sweating, increased heart
rate, increased cardiac
output, increased blood
pressure, coma, asphyxia,
and/or convulsions. It should
be noted that current
concentrations of CO
2 in the
earth’s atmosphere are
estimated to be
approximately 370 ppm, the
actual reference exposure
level (level at which adverse
health effects typically
occur) is at exposure levels
of 5,000 ppm averaged over
10 hours in a 40-hour
workweek and short-term
reference exposure levels of
30,000 ppm averaged over a
15-minute period (16).
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
19 GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
CH4 CH4 is an extremely effective
absorber of radiation, although
its atmospheric concentration is
less than CO2 and its lifetime in
the atmosphere is brief (10-12
years), compared to other GHGs.
CH4 has both natural
and anthropogenic
sources. It is
released as part of
the biological
processes in low
oxygen
environments, such
as in swamplands or
in rice production (at
the roots of the
plants). Over the last
50 years, human
activities such as
growing rice, raising
cattle, using natural
gas, and mining coal
have added to the
atmospheric
concentration of
CH
4. Other
anthropocentric
sources include
fossil-fuel
combustion and
biomass burning
(17).
CH4 is extremely reactive
with oxidizers, halogens, and
other halogen-containing
compounds. Exposure to
elevated levels of CH
4 can
cause asphyxiation, loss of
consciousness, headache
and dizziness, nausea and
vomiting, weakness, loss of
coordination, and an
increased breathing rate.
N2O N2O, also known as laughing gas,
is a colorless GHG.
Concentrations of N2O also
began to rise at the beginning of
the industrial revolution. In
1998, the global concentration
was 314 parts per billion (ppb).
N2O is produced by
microbial processes
in soil and water,
including those
reactions which
occur in fertilizer
containing nitrogen.
In addition to
agricultural sources,
some industrial
processes (fossil
fuel-fired power
plants, nylon
production, nitric
acid production, and
vehicle emissions)
also contribute to its
atmospheric load. It
is used as an aerosol
spray propellant, i.e.,
in whipped cream
N2O can cause dizziness,
euphoria, and sometimes
slight hallucinations. In small
doses, it is considered
harmless. However, in some
cases, heavy and extended
use can cause Olney’s
Lesions (brain damage) (18).
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
20 GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
bottles. It is also
used in potato chip
bags to keep chips
fresh. It is used in
rocket engines and
in race cars. N
2O can
be transported into
the stratosphere, be
deposited on the
earth’s surface, and
be converted to
other compounds by
chemical reaction
(18).
Chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs)
CFCs are gases formed
synthetically by replacing all
hydrogen atoms in CH
4 or ethane
(C2H6) with chlorine and/or
fluorine atoms. CFCs are
nontoxic, nonflammable,
insoluble and chemically
unreactive in the troposphere
(the level of air at the earth’s
surface).
CFCs have no natural
source but were first
synthesized in 1928.
They were used for
refrigerants, aerosol
propellants and
cleaning solvents.
Due to the discovery
that they are able to
destroy
stratospheric ozone,
a global effort to halt
their production was
undertaken and was
extremely
successful, so much
so that levels of the
major CFCs are now
remaining steady or
declining. However,
their long
atmospheric
lifetimes mean that
some of the CFCs
would remain in the
atmosphere for over
100 years (19).
In confined indoor locations,
working with CFC-113 or
other CFCs is thought to
result in death by cardiac
arrhythmia (heart frequency
too high or too low) or
asphyxiation.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
21 GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
HFCs HFCs are synthetic, man-made
chemicals that are used as a
substitute for CFCs. Out of all the
GHGs, they are one of three
groups with the highest global
warming potential (GWP). The
HFCs with the largest measured
atmospheric abundances are (in
order), Fluoroform (HFC-23),
1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-
134a), and 1,1-difluoroethane
(HFC-152a). Prior to 1990, the
only significant emissions were
of HFC-23. HCF-134a emissions
are increasing due to its use as a
refrigerant.
HFCs are manmade
for applications such
as automobile air
conditioners and
refrigerants.
No health effects are known
to result from exposure to
HFCs.
PFCs PFCs have stable molecular
structures and do not break
down through chemical
processes in the lower
atmosphere. High-energy
ultraviolet rays, which occur
about 60 kilometers above
earth’s surface, are able to
destroy the compounds. Because
of this, PFCs have exceptionally
long lifetimes, between 10,000
and 50,000 years. Two common
PFCs are tetrafluoromethane
(CF
4) and hexafluoroethane
(C2F6). The EPA estimates that
concentrations of CF4 in the
atmosphere are over 70 parts
per trillion (ppt).
The two main
sources of PFCs are
primary aluminum
production and
semiconductor
manufacture.
No health effects are known
to result from exposure to
PFCs.
SF6 SF6 is an inorganic, odorless,
colorless, nontoxic,
nonflammable gas. It also has
the highest GWP of any gas
evaluated (23,900) (20). The EPA
indicates that concentrations in
the 1990s were about 4 ppt.
SF
6 is used for
insulation in electric
power transmission
and distribution
equipment, in the
magnesium industry,
in semiconductor
manufacturing, and
as a tracer gas for
leak detection.
In high concentrations in
confined areas, the gas
presents the hazard of
suffocation because it
displaces the oxygen needed
for breathing.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
22 GHGs Description Sources Health Effects
Nitrogen Trifluoride
(NF3)
NF3 is a colorless gas with a
distinctly moldy odor. The World
Resources Institute (WRI)
indicates that NF3 has a 100-year
GWP of 17,200 (21).
NF3 is used in
industrial processes
and is produced in
the manufacturing of
semiconductors,
Liquid Crystal Display
(LCD) panels, types
of solar panels, and
chemical lasers.
Long-term or repeated
exposure may affect the liver
and kidneys and may cause
fluorosis (22).
The potential health effects related directly to the emissions of CO2, CH4, and N2O as they relate to development projects such as the proposed Project are still being debated in the scientific community. Their cumulative effects to GCC have the potential to cause adverse effects to human health. Increases in Earth’s ambient temperatures would result in more intense heat waves, causing more heat -related deaths. Scientists also purport those higher ambient temperatures would increase disease survival rates and result in more widespread disease. Climate change would likely cause shifts in weather patterns, potentially resulting in devastating droughts and food shortages in some areas (23). Exhibit 2-A presents the potential impacts of global warming (24).
E
XHIBIT 2-A: SUMMARY OF PROJECTED GLOBAL WARMING IMPACT, 2070-2099 (AS COMPARED WITH 1961-1990)
Source: Barbara H. Allen-Diaz. “Climate change affects us all.” University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 2009.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
23 2.4 G LOBAL WARMING POTENTIAL
GHGs have varying GWP values. GWP of a GHG indicates the amount of warming a gas cause over a given period of time and represents the potential of a gas to trap heat in the atmosphere. CO 2 is utilized as the reference gas for GWP, and thus has a GWP of 1. CO2 equivalent (CO2e) is a term used for describing the difference GHGs in a common unit. CO 2e signifies the amount of CO 2 which would have the equivalent GWP.
The atmospheric lifetime and GWP of selected GHGs are summarized at Table 2 -2. As shown in the table below, GWP for the 2 nd Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)’s scientific and socio -economic assessment on climate change, range from 1 for CO2 to 23,900 for SF 6 and GWP for the IPCC’s 5 th Assessment Report range from 1 for CO 2 to 23,500 for SF6 (25).
TABLE 2-2: GWP AND ATMOSPHERIC LIFETIME OF SELECT GHGS
Gas Atmospheric Lifetime
(years)
GWP (100-year time horizon)
2nd Assessment Report 5th Assessment Report
CO2 See* 1 1
CH4 12 .4 21 28
N2O 121 310 265
HFC-23 222 11,700 12,400
HFC-134a 13.4 1,300 1,300
HFC-152a 1.5 140 138
SF6 3,200 23,900 23,500
*As per Appendix 8.A. of IPCC’s 5th Assessment Report, no single lifetime can be given.
Source: Table 2.14 of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007
2.5 GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORIES
2.5.1 G LOBAL
Worldwide anthropogenic GHG emissions are tracked by the IPCC for industrialized nations (referred to as Annex I) and developing nations (referred to as Non- Annex I). Human GHG emissions data for Annex I nations are available through 2018. Based on the latest available data, the sum of these emissions totaled approximately 28,768,4 40 gigagram (Gg) CO 2e1 (26) (27) as
summarized on Table 2-3.
1 The global emissions are the sum of Annex I and non-Annex I countries, without counting Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF).
For countries without 2018 data, the United Nations’ Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) data for the most recent year were used U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, “Annex I Parties – GHG total without LULUCF,” The most recent GHG emissions for China and India are from 2014 and 2010, respectively.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
24 2.5.2 U NITED STATES
As noted in Table 2-3, the United States, as a single country, was the number two producer of GHG emissions in 2018.
TABLE 2-3: TOP GHG PRODUCING COUNTRIES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION 2 Emitting Countries GHG Emissions (Gg CO2e)
China 12,300,200
United States 6,676,650
European Union (28-member countries) 4,232,274
Russian Federation 2,220,123
India 2,100,850
Japan 1,238,343
Total 28,768,440
2.5.3 S TATE OF CALIFORNIA
California has significantly slowed the rate of growth of GHG emissions due to the implementation of energy efficiency programs as well as adoption of strict emission controls but is still a substantial contributor to the United States (U.S.) emissions inv entory total (28). The California Air Resource Board (CARB) compiles GHG inventories for the State of California. Based upon the 2020 GHG inventory data (i.e., the latest year for which data are available) for the 2000- 2019 GHG emissions period, California emitted an average 418.1 million metric tons of CO 2e per
year (MMTCO2e/yr) or 418,100 Gg CO2e (6.26% of the total United States GHG emissions) (29).
2.5.4 C ITY OF MORENO VALLEY
The emissions inventory covers direct GHG emissions from sources within the boundaries of Moreno Valley, including fuel combusted and solid waste generated within the city. Indirect emissions associated with the consumption of energy that is generated outside the borders of the city (such as electricity, with no end point emissions) are also inc luded. The emissions inventory is calculated for the year 2018, which is the baseline year for existing land use buildout and vehicle miles traveled. The emissions inventory also uses data from 2019, the most recent year for which all data was available.
The total GHG emissions were 866,410 MTCO
2e/year in 2018. Table 2-4 summarizes the sources
and quantities of emissions, and Figure 2-1 shows the emissions graphically by sector. The largest sector is transportation, at 56%, followed by residential (24%) and commercial (12%).
2 Used http://unfccc.int data for Annex I countries. Consulted the CAIT Climate Data Explorer in https://www.climatewatchdata.org site to reference Non-Annex I countries of China and India.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
25 TABLE 2-4: 2018 GHG EMISSIONS (MTCO2E/YR)
Sector Subsector Emissions
Residential
Electricity 90,154
Natural Gas 116,635
Total Residential 206,790
Commercial
Electricity 69,536
Natural Gas 31,230
Total Commercial 100,766
Industrial
Electricity 19,370
Natural Gas 219
Total Industrial 19,589
Transportation
Electricity 373,504
Natural Gas 109,599
Total Transportation 483,063
Solid Waste
Electricity 1,259
Natural Gas 3,354
Construction/Other 3,124
Total Solid Waste 7,737
Water Total Water 2,129
Wastewater Total Wastewater 4,395
Agriculture Total Agriculture 1,938
Off-Road Equipment Total Off-Toad Equipment 37,784
Public Lighting Total Public Lighting 2,219
Grand Total 866,410
2.5.5 P ROJECT SITE
The Project site is vacant and undeveloped and is not a source of GHG emissions.
2.6 E FFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN CALIFORNIA
2.6.1 P UBLIC HEALTH
Higher temperatures may increase the frequency, duration, and intensity of conditions conducive to air pollution formation. For example, days with weather conducive to ozone formation could increase from 25 to 35% under the lower warming range to 75 to 85% under the medium warming range. In addition, if global background ozone levels increase as predicted in some scenarios, it may become impossible to meet local air quality standards. Air quality could be further compromised by increases in wildfires, which emit fine particulate matter that can travel long distances, depending on wind conditions. Based on Our Changing Climate Assessing the Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
26 Risks to California by the California Climate Change Center , large wildfires could become up to 55% more frequent if GHG emissions are not significantly reduced (30).
In addition, under the higher warming range scenario, there could be up to 100 more days per year with temperatures above 90 °F in Los Angeles and 95 °F in Sacramento by 2100. This is a significant increase over historical patterns and approximately twice the increase projected if temperatures remain within or below the lower warming range. Rising temperatures could increase the risk of death from dehydration, heat stroke/exhaustion, heart attack, stroke, and respiratory distress caused by extreme heat.
2.6.2 W
ATER RESOURCES
A vast network of man-made reservoirs and aqueducts captures and transports water throughout the state from northern California rivers and the Colorado River. The current distribution system relies on Sierra Nevada snowpack to supply water during the dry s pring and summer months.
Rising temperatures, potentially compounded by decreases in precipitation, could severely reduce spring snowpack, increasing the risk of summer water shortages.
If temperatures continue to increase, more precipitation could fall as rain instead of snow, and the snow that does fall could melt earlier, reducing the Sierra Nevada spring snowpack by as much as 70 to 90%. Under the lower warming range scenario, snowpack losses could be only half as large as those possible if temperatures were to rise to the higher warming range. How much snowpack could be lost depends in part on future precipitation patterns, the projecti ons for which remain uncertain. However, even under the wetter climate projections, the loss of snowpack could pose challenges to water managers and hamper hydropower generation. It could also adversely affect winter tourism. Under the lower warming range, the ski season at lower elevations could be reduced by as much as a month. If temperatures reach the higher warming range and precipitation declines, there might be many years with insufficient snow for skiing and snowboarding.
The State’s water supplies are also at risk from rising sea levels. An influx of saltwater could degrade California’s estuaries, wetlands, and groundwater aquifers. Saltwater intrusion caused by rising sea levels is a major threat to the quality and reliab ility of water within the southern edge of the Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta – a major fresh water supply.
2.6.3 A
GRICULTURE
Increased temperatures could cause widespread changes to the agriculture industry reducing the quantity and quality of agricultural products statewide. First, California farmers could possibly lose as much as 25% of the water supply needed. Although higher CO2 levels can stimulate plant production and increase plant water-use efficiency, California’s farmers could face greater water demand for crops and a less reliable water supply as temperatures rise. Crop growth and development could change, as could the intensity and frequency of pest and disease outbreaks.
Rising temperatures could aggravate ozone pollution, which makes plants more susceptible to disease and pests and interferes with plant growth.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
27 Plant growth tends to be slow at low temperatures, increasing with rising temperatures up to a threshold. However, faster growth can result in less -than-optimal development for many crops, so rising temperatures could worsen the quantity and quality of yield for a number of California’s agricultural products. Products likely to be most affected include wine grapes, fruits, and nuts.
In addition, continued GCC could shift the ranges of existing invasive plants and weeds and alter competition patterns with native plants. Range expansion could occur in many species while range contractions may be less likely in rapidly evolving species with significant population s already established. Should range contractions occur, new or different weed species could fill the emerging gaps. Continued GCC could alter the abundance and types of many pests, lengthen pests’ breeding season, and increase pathogen growth rates.
2.6.4 F
ORESTS AND LANDSCAPES
GCC has the potential to intensify the current threat to forests and landscapes by increasing the risk of wildfire and altering the distribution and character of natural vegetation. If temperatures rise into the medium warming range, the risk of large wildfires in California could increase by as much as 55 %, which is almost twice the increase expected if temperatures stay in the lower warming range. However, since wildfire risk is determined by a combination of factors, including precipitation, winds, temperature, and landscape and vegetation conditions, future risks would not be uniform throughout the state. In contrast, wildfires in northern California could increase by up to 90% due to decreased precipitation.
Moreover, continued GCC has the potential to alter natural ecosystems and biological diversity within the state. For example, alpine and subalpine ecosystems could decline by as much as 60 to 80% by the end of the century as a result of increasing temperatures. The productivity of the state’s forests has the potential to decrease as a result of GCC.
2.6.5 R
ISING SEA LEVELS
Rising sea levels, more intense coastal storms, and warmer water temperatures could increasingly threaten the state’s coastal regions. Under the higher warming range scenario, sea level is anticipated to rise 22 to 35 inches by 2100. Elevations of this mag nitude would inundate low-lying coastal areas with saltwater, accelerate coastal erosion, threaten vital levees and inland water systems, and disrupt wetlands and natural habitats. Under the lower warming range scenario, sea level could rise 12-14 inches.
2.7 REGULATORY SETTING
2.7.1 INTERNATIONAL
Climate change is a global issue involving GHG emissions from all around the world; therefore, countries such as the ones discussed below have made an effort to reduce GHGs.
IPCC
In 1988, the United Nations (U.N.) and the World Meteorological Organization established the IPCC to assess the scientific, technical, and socioeconomic information relevant to understanding the Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
28 scientific basis of risk of human -induced climate change, its potential impacts, and options for adaptation and mitigation.
UNITED NATION’S FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) On March 21, 1994, the U.S. joined a number of countries around the world in signing the Convention. Under the UNFCCC, governments gather and share information on GHG emissions, national policies, and best practices; launch national strategies for addressing GHG emissions and adapting to expected impacts, including the provision of financial and technological support to developing countries; and cooperate in preparing for adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE CHANGE TREATIES
The Kyoto Protocol is an international agreement linked to the UNFCCC. The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing GHG emissions at an average of 5% against 1990 levels over the five - year period 2008– 2012. The Convention (as discussed above) encouraged industrialized countries to stabilize emissions; however, the Protocol commits them to do so. Developed countries have contributed more emissions over the last 150 years; therefore, the Protocol places a heavier burden on developed nations under the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities.”
In 2001, President George W. Bush indicated that he would not submit the treaty to the U.S.
Senate for ratification, which effectively ended American involvement in the Kyoto Protocol. In December 2009, international leaders met in Copenhagen to address the future of international climate change commitments post -Kyoto. No binding agreement was reached in Copenhagen; however, the UN Climate Change Committee identified the long -term goal of limiting the maximum global average temperature increase to no more than 2 degrees Celsius (°C) above pre- industrial levels, subject to a review in 2015. The Committee held additional meetings in Durban, South Africa in November 2011; Doha, Qatar in November 2012; and Warsaw, Poland in November 2013. The meetings gradually gain ed consensus among participants on individual climate change issues.
On September 23, 2014, more than 100 Heads of State and Government and leaders from the private sector and civil society met at the Climate Summit in New York hosted by the U.N. At the Summit, heads of government, business and civil society announced actions in areas that would have the greatest impact on reducing emissions, including climate finance, energy, transport, industry, agriculture, cities, forests, and building resilience.
Parties to the UNFCCC reached a landmark agreement on December 12, 2015, in Paris, charting a fundamentally new course in the two-decade-old global climate effort. Culminating a four-year negotiating round, the new treaty ends the strict differentiation be tween developed and developing countries that characterized earlier efforts, replacing it with a common framework that commits all countries to put forward their best efforts and to strengthen them in the years ahead. This includes, for the first time, requirements that all parties report regularly on their emissions and implementation efforts and undergo international review.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
29 The agreement and a companion decision by parties were the key outcomes of the conference, known as the 21st session of the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP) 21. Together, the Paris Agreement and the accompanying COP decision:
• Reaffirm the goal of limiting global temperature increase well below 2 °C, while urging efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees;
• Establish binding commitments by all parties to make “nationally determined contributions” (NDCs), and to pursue domestic measures aimed at achieving them; • Commit all countries to report regularly on their emissions and “progress made in implementing and achieving” their NDCs, and to undergo international review; • Commit all countries to submit new NDCs every five years, with the clear expectation that they would “represent a progression” beyond previous ones; • Reaffirm the binding obligations of developed countries under the UNFCCC to support the efforts of developing countries, while for the first time encouraging voluntary contributions by developing countries too;
• Extend the current goal of mobilizing $100 billion a year in support by 2020 through 2025, with a new, higher goal to be set for the period after 2025; • Extend a mechanism to address “loss and damage” resulting from climate change, which explicitly would not “involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation;” • Require parties engaging in international emissions trading to avoid “double counting;” and • Call for a new mechanism, similar to the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol, enabling emission reductions in one country to be counted toward another country’s NDC (C2ES 2015a) (31).
Following President Biden’s day one executive order , the United States officially rejoined the landmark Paris Agreement on February 19, 2021, positioning the country to once again be part of the global climate solution. Meanwhile, city, state, business, and civic leaders across the country and around the world have been ramping up efforts to drive the clean energy advances needed to meet the goals of the agreement and put the brakes on dangerous climate change.
2.7.2 NATIONAL
Prior to the last decade, there have been no concrete federal regulations of GHGs or major planning for climate change adaptation. The following are actions regarding the federal government, GHGs, and fuel efficiency.
GHG ENDANGERMENT
In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency 549 U.S. 497 (2007), decided on April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court (Supreme Court) found that four GHGs, including CO2, are air pollutants subject to regulation under Section 202(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Supreme Court held that the EPA Administrator must determine whether emissions of GHGs from new motor vehicles cause or contribute to air pollution, which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or wheth er the science is too uncertain to make a reasoned Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
30 decision. On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings regarding GHGs under section 202(a) of the CAA:
• Endangerment Finding: The Administrator finds that the current and projected concentrations of the six key well-mixed GHGs— CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6—in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. • Cause or Contribute Finding: The Administrator finds that the combined emissions of these well-mixed GHGs from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution, which threatens public health and welfare.
These findings do not impose requirements on industry or other entities. However, this was a prerequisite for implementing GHG emissions standards for vehicles, as discussed in the section “Clean Vehicles” below. After a lengthy legal challenge, the Supreme Court declined to review an Appeals Court ruling that upheld the EPA Administrator’s findings (32).
C
LEAN VEHICLES
Congress first passed the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law in 1975 to increase the fuel economy of cars and light duty trucks. The law has become more stringent over time. On May 19, 2009, President Obama put in motion a new national policy to increase fuel economy for all new cars and trucks sold in the U.S. On April 1, 2010, the EPA, and the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced a joint final rule establishing a national program that would reduce GHG emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in the U.S.
The first phase of the national program applies to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium- duty (MD) passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. They require these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of CO 2 per mile,
equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon (mpg) if the automobile industry were to meet this CO2 level solely through fuel economy improvements. Together, these standards would cut CO2 emissions by an estimated 960 million metric tons and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012 –2016). The EPA and the NHTSA issued final rules on a second- phase joint rulemaking establishing national standards for light- duty vehicles for model years 2017 through 2025 in August 2012. The new standards for model years 2017 through 2025 apply to passenger cars, light- duty trucks, and MD passenger vehicles. The final standards are projected to result in an average industry fleetwide level of 163 grams/mile of CO 2 in model year 2025, which is equivalent to 54.5 mpg if achieved exclusively through fuel economy improvements.
The EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation issued final rules for the first national standards to reduce GHG emissions and improve fuel efficiency of heavy -duty trucks (HDT) and buses on September 15, 2011, effective November 14, 2011. For combination tractors, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards that begin in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 20 % reduction in CO
2 emissions and fuel consumption by the 2018 model year.
For HDT and vans, the agencies are proposing separate gasoline and diesel truck standards, which phase in starting in the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 10% reduction for gasoline vehicles and a 15 % reduction for diesel vehicles by the 2018 model year (12 and 17 % respectively if Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
31 accounting for air conditioning leakage). Lastly, for vocational vehicles, the engine and vehicle standards would achieve up to a 10% reduction in fuel consumption and CO2 emissions from the 2014 to 2018 model years.
On April 2, 2018, the EPA signed the Mid- term Evaluation Final Determination, which declared that the MY 2022-2025 GHG standards are not appropriate and should be revised (33). This Final Determination serves to initiate a notice to further consider appropriate standards for MY 2022- 2025 light-duty vehicles. On August 2, 2018, the NHTSA in conjunction with the EPA, released a notice of proposed rulemaking, the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks (SAFE Vehicles Rule). The SAFE Vehicles Rule was proposed to amend exiting Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) and tailpipe CO 2 standards for passenger cars and light trucks and to establish new standards covering model years 2021 through 2026. As of March 31, 2020, the NHTSA and EPA finalized the SAFE Vehicle Rule which increased stringency of CAFE and CO2 emissions standards by 1.5% each year through model year 2026 (34).
MANDATORY REPORTING OF GHGS
The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008, passed in December 2007, requires the establishment of mandatory GHG reporting requirements. On September 22, 2009, the EPA issued the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHGs Rule, which became effective January 1, 2010. The rule requires reporting of GHG emissions from large sources and suppliers in the U.S. and is intended to collect accurate and timely emissions data to inform future policy decisions. Under the rule, suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, man ufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons per year (MT/yr) or more of GHG emissions are required to submit annual reports to the EPA.
N
EW SOURCE REVIEW
The EPA issued a final rule on May 13, 2010, that establishes thresholds for GHGs that define when permits under the New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V Operating Permit programs are required for new and existing industrial facilities. This final rule “tailors” the requirements of these CAA permitting programs to limit which facilities would be required to obtain Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V permits. In the preamble to the revisions to the Federal Code of Regulations, the EPA states:
“This rulemaking is necessary because without it the Prevention of Significant Deterioration and Title V requirements would apply, as of January 2, 2011, at the 100 or 250 tons per year levels provided under the CAA, greatly increasing the number of required permits, imposing undue costs on small sources, overwhelming the resources of permitting authorities, and severely impairing the functioning of the programs. EPA is relieving these resource burdens by phasing in the applicability of these programs to GH G sources, starting with the largest GHG emitters. This rule establishes two initial steps of the phase -in. The rule also commits the agency to take certain actions on future steps addressing smaller sources but excludes certain smaller sources from Prevention of Significant Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
32 Deterioration and Title V permitting for GHG emissions until at least April 30, 2016.”
The EPA estimates that facilities responsible for nearly 70 % of the national GHG emissions from stationary sources would be subject to permitting requirements under this rule. This includes the nation’s largest GHG emitters—power plants, refineries, and cement production facilities.
STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR GHG EMISSIONS FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES: ELECTRIC UTILITY GENERATING UNITS
As required by a settlement agreement, the EPA proposed new performance standards for emissions of CO
2 for new, affected, fossil fuel-fired electric utility generating units on March 27, 2012. New sources greater than 25 megawatts (MW) would be required to meet an output-based standard of 1,000 pounds (lbs) of CO2 per MW-hour (MWh), based on the performance of widely used natural gas combined cycle technology. It should be noted that on February 9, 2016 , the Supreme Court issued a stay of this regulation pending litigation. Additionally, the current EPA Administrator has also signed a measure to repeal the C lean Power Plan, including the CO 2 standards. The Clean Power Plan was officially repealed on June 19, 2019, when the EPA issued the final Affordable Clean Energy rule (ACE). Under ACE, new state emission guidelines were established that provided existing coal -fired electric utility generating units with achievable standards.
C
AP-AND-TRADE
Cap-and-trade refers to a policy tool where emissions are limited to a certain amount and can be traded or provides flexibility on how the emitter can comply. Successful examples in the U.S. include the Acid Rain Program and the N2O Budget Trading Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule in the northeast. There is no federal GHG cap-and-trade program currently; however, some states have joined to create initiatives to provide a mechanism for cap-and-trade.
The Regional GHG Initiative is an effort to reduce GHGs among the states of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont. Each state caps CO 2 emissions from power plants, auctions CO 2 emission allowances, and invests the proceeds in strategic energy programs that further reduce emissions, save consumers money, create jobs, and build a clean energy economy. The Initiative began in 2008 and in 2020 has retained all participating states.
The Western Climate Initiative (WCI) partner jurisdictions have developed a comprehensive initiative to reduce regional GHG emissions to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. The partners were originally California, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, and Quebec. However, Manitoba and Ontario are not currently participating. California linked with Quebec’s cap -and-trade system January 1, 2014, and joint offset auctions took place in 2015. While the WCI has yet to publish whether it has successfully reached the 2020 emissions goal initiative set in 2007, SB 32 requires that California, a major partner in the WCI, adopt the goal of reducing statewide GHG emissions to 40% below the 1990 level by 2030.
S
MARTWAY PROGRAM
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
33 The SmartWay Program is a public -private initiative between the EPA, large and small trucking companies, rail carriers, logistics companies, commercial manufacturers, retailers, and other federal and state agencies. Its purpose is to improve fuel efficienc y and the environmental performance (reduction of both GHG emissions and air pollution) of the goods movement supply chains. SmartWay is comprised of four components (35):
1. SmartWay Transport Partnership: A partnership in which freight carriers and shippers commit to benchmark operations, track fuel consumption, and improve performance annually.
2. SmartWay Technology Program: A testing, verification, and designation program to help freight companies identify equipment, technologies, and strategies that save fuel and lower emissions.
3. SmartWay Vehicles: A program that ranks light‐duty cars and small trucks and identifies superior environmental performers with the SmartWay logo.
4. SmartWay International Interests: Guidance and resources for countries seeking to develop freight sustainability programs modeled after SmartWay.
SmartWay effectively refers to requirements geared towards reducing fuel consumption. Most large trucking fleets driving newer vehicles are compliant with SmartWay design requirements.
Moreover, over time, all HDTs would have to comply with the C ARB GHG Regulation that is designed with the SmartWay Program in mind, to reduce GHG emissions by making them more fuel-efficient. For instance, in 2015, 53 foot or longer dry vans or refrigerated trailers equipped with a combination of SmartWay -verified l ow-rolling resistance tires and SmartWay -verified aerodynamic devices would obtain a total of 10% or more fuel savings over traditional trailers.
Through the SmartWay Technology Program, the EPA has evaluated the fuel saving benefits of various devices through grants, cooperative agreements, emissions, and fuel economy testing, demonstration projects and technical literature review. As a result, the EPA has determined the following types of technologies provide fuel saving and/or emission reducing benefits when used properly in their designed applications, and has verified certain products:
• Idle reduction technologies – less idling of the engine when it is not needed would reduce fuel consumption.
• Aerodynamic technologies minimize drag and improve airflow over the entire tractor‐trailer vehicle. Aerodynamic technologies include gap fairings that reduce turbulence between the tractor and trailer, side skirts that minimize wind under the trailer, and rear fairings that reduce turbulence and pressure drop at the rear of the trailer. • Low rolling resistance tires can roll longer without slowing down, thereby reducing the amount of fuel used. Rolling resistance (or rolling friction or rolling drag) is the force resisting the motion when a tire rolls on a surface. The wheel would eventually slow down because of this resistance.
• Retrofit technologies include things such as diesel particulate filters, emissions upgrades (to a higher tier), etc., which would reduce emissions.
• Federal excise tax exemptions.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13990
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
34 On January 20, 2021, Federal agencies were directed to immediately review, and take action to address, Federal regulations promulgated and other actions taken during the last 4 years that conflict with national objectives to improve public health and the environment; ensure access to clean air and water; limit exposure to dangerous chemicals and pesticides; hold polluters accountable, including those who disproportionately harm communities of color and low-income communities; reduce greenhouse gas emissions; bolster resilience to the impacts of climate change; restore and expand our national treasures and monuments; and prioritize both environmental justice and employment.
2.7.3 C ALIFORNIA
2.7.3.1 LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS TO REDUCE GHGS
The State of California legislature has enacted a series of bills that constitute the most aggressive program to reduce GHGs of any state in the nation. Some legislation such as the landmark AB 32 was specifically enacted to address GHG emissions. Other legislation such as Title 24 and Title 20 energy standards were originally adopted for other purposes such as energy and water conservation, but also provide GHG reductions. This section describes the major provisions of the legislation.
AB
32 The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, which require d that GHGs emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year 2020 (this goal has been met3). GHGs as defined under AB 32 include CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6. Since AB 32 was enacted, a seventh chemical, NF3, has also been added to the list of GHGs. CARB is the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of GHGs. Pursuant to AB 32, CARB adopted regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective GHG emission reductions. AB 32 states the following:
“Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems.”
SB
375
On September 30, 2008, SB 375 was signed by Governor Schwarzenegger. According to SB 375, the transportation sector is the largest contributor of GHG emissions, which emits over 40% of the total GHG emissions in California. SB 375 states, “Without improved land use and transportation policy,
3 Based upon the 2019 GHG inventory data (i.e., the latest year for which data are available) for the 2000-2017 GHG emissions period, California emitted an average 424.1 MMTCO2e (29). This is less than the 2020 emissions target of 431 MMTCO2e.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
35 California would not be able to achieve the goals of AB 32.” SB 375 does the following: it (1) requires metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to include sustainable community strategies in their regional transportation plans for reducing GHG emissions, (2) aligns planning for transportation and housing, and (3) creates specified incentives for the implementation of the strategies.
SB 375 requires MPOs to prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) within the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) that guides growth while taking into account the transportation, housing, environmental, and economic needs of the region. SB 375 uses CEQA streamlining as an incentive to encourage residential projects, which help achieve AB 32 goals to reduce GHG emissions. Although SB 375 does not prevent CARB from adopting additional regulations, such actions are not anticipated in the foreseeable future.
Concerning CEQA, SB 375, as codified in Public Resources Code Section 21159.28, states that CEQA findings for certain projects are not required to reference, describe, or discuss (1) growth inducing impacts, or (2) any project-specific or cumulative impacts from cars and light-duty truck trips generated by the project on global warming or the regional transportation network, if the project:
1. Is in an area with an approved sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy that CARB accepts as achieving the GHG emission reduction targets.
2. Is consistent with that strategy (in designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies).
3. Incorporates the MMs required by an applicable prior environmental document.
AB 1493 - Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards
Enacted on July 22, 2002, California AB 1493, also known as the Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. Implementation of the regulation was delayed by lawsuits filed by automakers and by the EPA’s denial of an implementation waiver. The EPA subsequently granted the requested waiver in 2009, which was uphe ld by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2011.
The standards phase in during the 2009 through 2016 MY . Several technologies stand out as providing significant reductions in emissions at favorable costs. These include discrete variable valve lift or camless valve actuation to optimize valve operation rather than relying on fixed valve timing and lift as has historically been done; turbocharging to boost power and allow for engine downsizing; improved multi -speed transmissions; and improved air conditioning systems that operate optimally, leak less, and/or use an alternative refrigerant.
The second phase of the implementation for the Pavley bill was incorporated into Amendments to the Low- Emission Vehicle Program ( LEV III) or the Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) program. The ACC program combines the control of smog -causing pollutants and GHG emissions into a single coordinated package of requirements for MY 2017 through 2025. The regulation would reduce GHGs from new cars by 34 % from 2016 levels by 2025. The new rules would clean up gasoline and diesel-powered cars, and deliver increasing numbers of zero-emission technologies, such as full battery electric cars, newly emerging plug -in hybrid electric vehicles (EV) and hydrogen fuel Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
36 cell cars. The package would also ensure adequate fueling infrastructure is available for the increasing numbers of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles planned for deployment in California.
CLEAN ENERGY AND POLLUTION REDUCTION ACT OF 2015 (SB 350) In October 2015, the legislature approved, and Governor Jerry Brown signed SB 350, which reaffirms California’s commitment to reducing its GHG emissions and addressing climate change.
Key provisions include an increase in the RPS, higher energy efficiency requirements for buildings, initial strategies towards a regional e lectricity grid, and improved infrastructure for EV charging stations. Provisions for a 50 % reduction in the use of petroleum statewide were removed from the Bill because of opposition and concern that it would prevent the Bill’s passage. Specifically, SB 350 requires the following to reduce statewide GHG emissions:
• Increase the amount of electricity procured from renewable energy sources from 33 % to 50% by 2030, with interim targets of 40% by 2024, and 25% by 2027. • Double the energy efficiency in existing buildings by 2030. This target would be achieved through the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the California Energy Commission (CEC), and local publicly owned utilities.
• Reorganize the Independent System Operator (ISO) to develop more regional electrify transmission markets and to improve accessibility in these markets, which would facilitate the growth of renewable energy markets in the western United States.
SB 32
On September 8, 2016, Governor Brown signed SB 32 and its companion bill, AB 197. SB 32 requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 40 % below 1990 levels by 2030, a reduction target that was first introduced in Executive Order B-30-15. The new legislation builds upon the AB 32 goal and provides an intermediate goal to achieving S -3-05, which sets a statewide GHG reduction target of 80 % below 1990 levels by 2050. AB 197 creates a legislative committee to oversee regulators to ensure that CARB not only responds to the Governor, but also the Legislature (11).
CARB
SCOPING PLAN UPDATE
In November 2017, CARB released the Final 2017 Scoping Plan Update (2017 Scoping Plan), which identifies the State’s post- 2020 reduction strategy. The 2017 Scoping Plan reflects the 2030 target of a 40% reduction below 1990 levels, set by Executive Order B -30-15 and codified by SB
32. Key programs that the proposed Second Update builds upon include the Cap- and-Trade Regulation, the LCFS, and much cleaner cars, trucks, and freight movement, utilizing clea ner, renewable energy, and strategies to reduce CH4 emissions from agricultural and other wastes.
The 2017 Scoping Plan establishes a new emissions limit of 260 MMTCO 2e for the year 2030, which corresponds to a 40% decrease in 1990 levels by 2030 (36).
California’s climate strategy would require contributions from all sectors of the economy, including the land base, and would include enhanced focus on zero and near -zero emission (ZE/NZE) vehicle technologies; continued investment in renewables, including solar roofs, wind, and other distributed generation; greater use of low carbon fuels; integrated land conservation Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
37 and development strategies; coordinated efforts to reduce emissions of short- lived climate pollutants (CH4, black carbon, and fluorinated gases); and an increased focus on integrated land use planning to support livable, transit-connected communities and conservation of agricultural and other lands. Requirements for direct GHG reductions at refineries would further support air quality co -benefits in neighborhoods, including in disadvantaged communities historically located adjacent to these large stationary sources, as well as efforts with California’s local air pollution control and air quality management districts (air districts) to tighten emission limits on a broad spectrum of industrial sources. Major elements of the 2017 Scoping Plan framework include:
• Implementing and/or increasing the standards of the Mobile Source Strategy, which include increasing zero-emission vehicles (ZEV) buses and trucks. • LCFS, with an increased stringency (18% by 2030).
• Implementing SB 350, which expands the RPS to 50 % RPS and doubles energy efficiency savings by 2030.
• California Sustainable Freight Action Plan, which improves freight system efficiency, utilizes near-zero emissions technology, and deployment of ZEV trucks. • Implementing the proposed Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy (SLPS), which focuses on reducing CH
4 and HCF emissions by 40% and anthropogenic black carbon emissions by 50% by year 2030.
• Continued implementation of SB 375.
• Post-2020 Cap-and-Trade Program that includes declining caps. • 20% reduction in GHG emissions from refineries by 2030. • Development of a Natural and Working Lands Action Plan to secure California’s land base as a net carbon sink.
Note, however, that the 2017 Scoping Plan acknowledges that:
“[a]chieving net zero increases in GHG emissions, resulting in no contribution to GHG impacts, may not be feasible or appropriate for every project, however, and the inability of a project to mitigate its GHG emissions to net zero does not imply the project results in a substantial contribution to the cumulatively significant environmental impact of climate change under CEQA.”
In addition to the statewide strategies listed above, the 2017 Scoping Plan also identifies local governments as essential partners in achieving the State’s long -term GHG reduction goals and identifies local actions to reduce GHG emissions. As part of the recommended actions, CARB recommends that local governments achieve a community-wide goal to achieve emissions of no more than 6 metric tons of CO
2e (MTCO2e) or less per capita by 2030 and 2 MTCO 2e or less per capita by 2050. For CEQA projects, CARB states that lead agencies may develop evidence- based bright-line numeric thresholds—consistent with the 2017 Scoping Plan and the State’s long-term GHG goals—and projects with emissions over that amount may be required to incorporate on- site design features and MMs that avoid or minimize project emissions to the degree feasible; or a performance-based metric using a CAP or other plan to reduce GHG emissions is appropriate.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
38 According to research conducted by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) and supported by CARB, California, under its existing and proposed GHG reduction policies, could achieve the 2030 goals under SB 32. The research utilized a new, validated model known as the California LBNL GHG Analysis of Policies Spreadsheet (CALGAPS), which simulates GHG and criteria pollutant emissions in California from 2010 to 2050 in accordance to existing and future GHG-reducing policies. The CALGAPS model showed tha t by 2030, emissions could range from 211 to 428 MTCO
2e per year (MTCO2e/yr), indicating that “even if all modeled policies are not implemented, reductions could be sufficient to reduce emissions 40 % below the 1990 level [of SB 32].” CALGAPS analyzed emissions through 2050 even though it did not generally account for policies that might be put in place after 2030. Although the research indicated that the emissions would not meet the State’s 80 % reduction goal by 2050, various combinations of policies could allow California’s cumulative emissions to remain very low through 2050 (37) (38).
CAP-AND-TRADE PROGRAM
The 2017 Scoping Plan identifies a Cap- and-Trade Program as one of the key strategies for California to reduce GHG emissions. According to CARB, a cap-and-trade program would help put California on the path to meet its goal of achieving a 40% reduction in GHG emissions from 1990 levels by 2030. Under cap -and-trade, an overall limit on GHG emissions from capped sectors is established, and facilities subject to the cap would be able to trade permits to emit GHGs within the overall limit.
CARB adopted a California Cap -and-Trade Program pursuant to its authority under AB 32. The Cap-and-Trade Program is designed to reduce GHG emissions from regulated entities by more than 16% between 2013 and 2020, and by an additional 40% by 2030. The statewide cap for GHG emissions from the capped sectors (e.g., electricity generation, petroleum refining, and cement production) commenced in 2013 and would decline over time, achieving GHG emission reductions throughout the program’s duration.
Covered entities that emit more than 25 ,000 MTCO
2e/yr must comply with the Cap- and-Trade
Program. Triggering of the 25,000 MTCO2e/yr “inclusion threshold” is measured against a subset of emissions reported and verified under the California Regulation for the Mandatory Reporting of GHG Emissions (Mandatory Reporting Rule or “MRR”).
Under the Cap- and-Trade Program, CARB issues allowances equal to the total amount of allowable emissions over a given compliance period and distributes these to regulated entities.
Covered entities are allocated free allowances in whole or part (if eligible), and may buy allowances at auction, purchase allowances from others, or purchase offset credits. Each covered entity with a compliance obligation is required to surrender “compliance instruments” for each MTCO
2e of GHG they emit. There also are requirem ents to surrender compliance instruments covering 30% of the prior year’s compliance obligation by November of each year (39).
The Cap -and-Trade Program provides a firm cap, which provides the highest certainty of achieving the 2030 target. An inherent feature of the Cap- and-Trade program is that it does not guarantee GHG emissions reductions in any discrete location or by any particular source. Rather, Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
39 GHG emissions reductions are only guaranteed on an accumulative basis. As summarized by CARB in the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan:
“The Cap-and-Trade Regulation gives companies the flexibility to trade allowances with others or take steps to cost-effectively reduce emissions at their own facilities.
Companies that emit more have to turn in more allowances or other compliance instruments. Companies that can cut their GHG emissions have to turn in fewer allowances. But as the cap declines, aggregate emissions must be reduced. In other words, a covered entity theoretically could increase its GHG emissions every year and still comply with the Cap- and-Trade Program if there is a reduction in GHG emissions from other covered entities. Such a focus on aggregate GHG emissions is considered appropriate because climate change is a global phenomenon, and the effects of GHG emissions are considered cumulative.” (40) The Cap-and-Trade Program covers approximately 80% of California’s GHG emissions (36) . The Cap-and-Trade Program covers the GHG emissions associated with electricity consumed in California, whether generated in-state or imported. Accordingly, GHG emissions associated with CEQA projects’ electricity usage are covered by the Cap-and-Trade Program. The Cap-and-Trade Program also covers fuel suppliers (natural gas and propane fuel providers and transportation fuel providers) to address emissions from such fuels and from combustion of other fossil fuels not directly covered at large sources in the Program’s first compliance period. The Cap-and-Trade Program covers the GHG emissions associated with the combustion of transportation fuels in California, whether refined in-state or imported.
2.7.3.2 E
XECUTIVE ORDERS RELATED TO GHG EMISSIONS
California’s Executive Branch has taken several actions to reduce GHGs through the use of Executive Orders. Although not regulatory, they set the tone for the state and guide the actions of state agencies.
E
XECUTIVE ORDER S-3-05
California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger announced on June 1, 2005, through Executive Order S-3-05, the following reduction targets for GHG emissions:
• By 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels.
• By 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels.
• By 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels.
The 2050 reduction goal represents what some scientists believe is necessary to reach levels that would stabilize the climate. The 2020 goal was established to be a mid-term target. Because this is an executive order, the goals are not legally enforceable for local governments or the private sector.
E
XECUTIVE ORDER S-01-07 (LCFS)
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
40 Governor Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S -01-07 on January 18, 2007. The order mandates that a statewide goal shall be established to reduce the carbon intensity of California’s transportation fuels by at least 10% by 2020. CARB adopted the LCFS on April 23, 2009.
The LCFS was challenged in the U.S. District Court in Fresno in 2011. The court’s ruling issued on December 29, 2011, included a preliminary injunction against CARB’s implementation of the rule.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the injunction on April 23, 2012, pending final ruling on appeal, allowing CARB to continue to implement and enforce the regulation. The Ninth Circuit Court’s decision, filed September 18, 2013, vacated the preliminary injunction. In essence, the court held that LCFS adopted by CARB were not in conflict with federal law. On August 8, 2013, the Fifth District Court of Appeal (California) ruled CARB failed to comply with CEQA and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when adopting regulations for LCFS. In a partially published opinion, the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment and directed issuance of a writ of mandate setting aside Resolution 09 -31 and two executive orders of CARB approving LCFS regulations promulgated to reduce GHG emissions. However, the court tailored its remedy to protect the public interest by allowing the LCFS regulations to remain operative while CARB complies with the procedural requirements it failed to satisfy.
To address the Court ruling, CARB was required to bring a new LCFS regulation to the Board for consideration in February 2015. The proposed LCFS regulation was required to contain revisions to the 2010 LCFS as well as new provisions designed to foster inve stments in the production of the low- carbon intensity fuels, offer additional flexibility to regulated parties, update critical technical information, simplify, and streamline program operations, and enhance enforcement.
On November 16, 2015, the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) approved the Final Rulemaking Package. The new LCFS regulation became effective on January 1, 2016.
In 2018, CARB approved amendments to the regulation, which included strengthening the carbon intensity benchmarks through 2030 in compliance with the SB 32 GHG emissions reduction target for 2030. The amendments included crediting opportunities to promote zero emission vehicle adoption, alternative jet fuel, carbon capture and sequestration, and advanced technologies to achieve deep decarbonization in the transportation sector (41).
E
XECUTIVE ORDER S-13-08
Executive Order S -13-08 states that “climate change in California during the next century is expected to shift precipitation patterns, accelerate sea level rise and increase temperatures, thereby posing a serious threat to California’s economy, to the health and welfare of its population and to its natural resources.” Pursuant to the requirements in the Order, the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy (CNRA 2009) was adopted, which is the “…first statewide, multi-sector, region-specific, and information -based climate change adaptation strategy in the United States.” Objectives include analyzing risks of climate change in California, identifying, and exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and specifying a direction for future research.
E
XECUTIVE ORDER B-30-15
On April 29, 2015, Governor Brown issued an executive order to establish a California GHG reduction target of 40 % below 1990 levels by 2030. The Governor’s executive order align ed Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
41 California’s GHG reduction targets with those of leading international governments ahead of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Paris late 2015. The Order sets a new interim statewide GHG emission reduction target to reduce GHG emissions to 40 % below 1990 levels by 2030 in order to ensure California meets its target of reducing GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 and directs CARB to update the 2017 Scoping Plan to express the 2030 target in terms of MMTCO2e. The Order also requires the state’s climate adaptation plan to be updated every three years, and for the State to continue its climate change research program, among other provisions.
As with Executive Order S-3-05, this Order is not legally enforceable as to local governments and the private sector. Legislation that would update AB 32 to make post 2020 targets and requirements a mandate is in process in the State Legislature.
E
XECUTIVE ORDER B-55-18 AND SB 100
SB 100 and Executive Order B- 55-18 were signed by Governor Brown on September 10, 2018.
Under the existing RPS, 25 % of retail sales of electricity are required to be from renewable sources by December 31, 2016, 33% by December 31, 2020, 40% by December 31, 2024, 45% by December 31, 2027, and 50% by December 31, 2030. SB 100 raises California’s RPS requirement to 50% renewable resources target by December 31, 2026, and to achieve a 60 % target by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also requires that retail sellers and local publicly owned electric utilities procure a minimum quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources so that the total kilowatt hours (kWh) of those products sold to their retail end- use customers achieve 44 % of retail sales by December 31, 2024, 52 % by December 31, 2027, and 60% by December 31, 2030. In addition to targets under AB 32 and SB 32, Executive Order B-55- 18 establishes a carbon neutrality goal for the state of California by 2045; and sets a goal to maintain net negative emissions thereafter. The Executive Order directs the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), California EPA (CalEPA), the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA), and CARB to include sequestration targets in the Natural and Working Lands Climate Change Implementation Plan consistent with the carbon neutrality goal.
2.7.3.3 C
ALIFORNIA REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES
California has a long history of adopting regulations to improve energy efficiency in new and remodeled buildings. These regulations have kept California’s energy consumption relatively flat even with rapid population growth.
TITLE 20 CCR SECTIONS 1601 ET SEQ. – APPLIANCE EFFICIENCY REGULATIONS The Appliance Efficiency Regulations regulate the sale of appliances in California. The Appliance Efficiency Regulations include standards for both federally regulated appliances and non- federally regulated appliances. 23 categories of appliances are included in the scope of these regulations. The standards within these regulations apply to appliances that are sold or offered for sale in California, except those sold wholesale in California for final retail sale outside the state and those designed and sold exclusively for use in recreational vehicles (RV) or other mobile equipment (CEC 2012).
T
ITLE 24 CCR PART 6 – CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
42 The California Energy Code was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.
The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods.
TITLE 24 CCR PART 11 – CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE The California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC).
CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2019 California Green Building Code Standards that became effective January 1, 2020.
Local jurisdictions are permitted to adopt more stringent requirements, as state law provides methods for local enhancements. CALGreen recognizes that many jurisdictions have developed existing construction waste and demolition ordinances and defers to them as the ruling guidance provided they establish a minimum 65% diversion requirement.
The code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction waste and demolition recycling infrastructure. The State Building Code provides the minimum standard that buildings must meet in order to be certified for occupancy, which is generally enforced by the local building official.
Energy efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel consumption and decreases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The 2019 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and became effective on January 1, 2020.
The 2019 Title 24 standards would result in less energy use, thereby reducing air pollutant emissions associated with energy consumption in the SCAB and across the State of California.
For example, the 2019 Title 24 standards would require solar photovoltaic systems for new homes, establish requirements for newly constructed healthcare facilities, encourage demand responsive technologies for residential buildings, and update indoor and outdoor lighting requirements for nonresidential buildings.
The CEC anticipates that single-family homes built with the 2019 standards would use approximately 7% less energy compared to the residential homes built under the 2016 standards. Additionally, after implementation of solar photovoltaic systems, homes built under the 2019 standards would use about 53% less energy than homes built under the 2016 standards. Nonresidential buildings (such as the Project) would use approximately 30% less energy due to lighting upgrade requirements (19).
Because the Project would be constructed after January 1, 2020, the 2019 CALGreen standards are applicable to the Project and require, among other items (20):
NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
43 • Short-term bicycle parking. If the new project or an additional alteration is anticipated to generate visitor traffic, provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 200 feet of the visitors’ entrance, readily visible to passers-by, for 5% of new visitor motorized vehicle parking spaces being added, with a minimum of one two-bike capacity rack (5.106.4.1.1).
• Long-term bicycle parking. For new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenant-occupants, provide secure bicycle parking for 5% of the tenant-occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one bicycle parking facility (5.106.4.1.2). • Designated parking for clean air vehicles. In new projects or additions to alterations that add 10 or more vehicular parking spaces, provide designated parking for any combination of low-emitting, fuel-efficient and carpool/van pool vehicles as shown in Table 5.106.5.2 (5.106.5.2). • Electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. New construction shall facilitate the future installation of EV supply equipment. The compliance requires empty raceways for future conduit and documentation that the electrical system has adequate capacity for the future load. The number of spaces to be provided for is contained in Table 5.106. 5.3.3 (5.106.5.3). • Outdoor light pollution reduction. Outdoor lighting systems shall be designed to meet the backlight, uplight and glare ratings per Table 5.106.8 (5.106.8). • Construction waste management. Recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65% of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste in accordance with Section
5.408.1.1. 5.405.1.2, or 5.408.1.3; or meet a local construction and demolition waste management ordinance, whichever is more stringent (5.408.1). • Excavated soil and land clearing debris. 100% of trees, stumps, rocks and associated vegetation and soils resulting primarily from land clearing shall be reused or recycled. For a phased project, such material may be stockpiled on site until the storage site is developed (5.408.3).
• Recycling by Occupants. Provide readily accessible areas that serve the entire building and are identified for the depositing, storage, and collection of non-hazardous materials for recycling, including (at a minimum) paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, plastics, organic waste, and metals or meet a lawfully enacted local recycling ordinance, if more restrictive (5.410.1).
• Water conserving plumbing fixtures and fittings. Plumbing fixtures (water closets and urinals) and fittings (faucets and showerheads) shall comply with the following:
o Water Closets. The effective flush volume of all water closets shall not exceed
1.28 gallons per flush (5.303.3.1)
o Urinals. The effective flush volume of wall-mounted urinals shall not exceed
0.125 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.1). The effective flush volume of floor- mounted or other urinals shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per flush (5.303.3.2.2). o Showerheads. Single showerheads shall have a minimum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute and 80 psi (5.303.3.3.1). When a shower is served by more than one showerhead, the combine flow rate of all showerheads and/or other shower outlets controlled by a single valve shall not exceed 1.8 gallons per minute at 80 psi (5.303.3.3.2).
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
44 o Faucets and fountains. Nonresidential lavatory faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 0.5 gallons per minute at 60 psi (5.303.3.4.1). Kitchen faucets shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute of 60 psi (5.303.3.4.2). Wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate of not more than 1.8 gallons per minute (5.303.3.4.3). Metering faucets shall not deliver more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.4). Metering faucets for wash fountains shall have a maximum flow rate not more than 0.20 gallons per cycle (5.303.3.4.5). • Outdoor potable water uses in landscaped areas. Nonresidential developments shall comply with a local water efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of Water Resources’ Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), whichever is more stringent (5.304.1).
• Water meters. Separate submeters or metering devices shall be installed for new buildings or additions in excess of 50,000 sf or for excess consumption where any tenant within a new building or within an addition that is project to consume more than 1,000 gallons per day (GPD) (5.303.1.1 and 5.303.1.2).
• Outdoor water uses in rehabilitated landscape projects equal or greater than 2,500 sf.
Rehabilitated landscape projects with an aggregate landscape area equal to or greater than 2,500 sf requiring a building or landscape permit (5.304.3). • Commissioning. For new buildings 10,000 sf and over, building commissioning shall be included in the design and construction processes of the building project to verify that the building systems and components meet the owner’s or owner representative’s project requirements (5.410.2).
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
45 CARB REFRIGERANT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CARB adopted a regulation in 2009 to reduce refrigerant GHG emissions from stationary sources through refrigerant leak detection and monitoring, leak repair, system retirement and retrofitting, reporting and recordkeeping, and proper refrigerant cylinder use, sale, and disposal.
The regulation is set forth in sections 95380 to 95398 of Title 17, CCR. The r ules implementing the regulation establish a limit on statewide GHG emissions from stationary facilities with refrigeration systems with more than 50 pounds of a high GWP refrigerant. The refrigerant management program is designed to (1) reduce emissions o f high-GWP GHG refrigerants from leaky stationary, non -residential refrigeration equipment; (2) reduce emissions from the installation and servicing of refrigeration and air- conditioning appliances using high- GWP refrigerants; and (3) verify GHG emission reductions.
T
RACTOR-TRAILER GHG REGULATION
The tractors and trailers subject to this regulation must either use EPA SmartWay certified tractors and trailers or retrofit their existing fleet with SmartWay verified technologies. The regulation applies primarily to owners of 53-foot or longer box-type trailers, including both dry- van and refrigerated -van trailers, and owners of the HD tractors that pull them on California highways. These owners are responsible for replacing or retrofitting their affected vehicles with compliant aerodynamic technologies and low rolling resistance tires. Sleeper cab tractors MY 2011 and later must be SmartWay certified. All other tractors must use SmartWay verified low rolling resistance tires. There are also requirements for trailers to have low rolling resistance tires and aerodynamic devices.
P
HASE I AND 2 HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLE GHG STANDARDS
In September 2011, C ARB has adopted a regulation for GHG emissions from HDTs and engines sold in California. It establishes GHG emission limits on truck and engine manufacturers and harmonizes with the EPA rule for new trucks and engines nationally. Existing HD vehicle regulations in California include engine criteria emission standards, tractor- trailer GHG requirements to implement SmartWay strategies (i.e., the Heavy-Duty Tractor -Trailer GHG Regulation), and in- use fleet retrofit requirements such as the Truck and Bus Regulation. The EPA rule has compliance requirements for new compression and spark ignition engines, as well as trucks from Class 2b through Class 8. Compliance requirements beg an with MY 2014 with stringency levels increasing through MY 2018. The rule organizes truck compliance into three groupings, which include a) HD pickups and vans; b) vocational vehicles; and c) combination tractors. The EPA rule does not regulate trailers.
CARB staff has worked jointly with the EPA and the NHTSA on the next phase of federal GHG emission standards for medium-duty trucks (MDT) and HDT vehicles, called federal Phase 2. The federal Phase 2 standards were built on the improvements in engine and vehicle efficiency required by the Phase 1 emission standards and represent a significant opportunity to achieve further GHG reductions for 2018 and later MY HDT vehicles, including trailers. The EPA and NHTSA have proposed to roll back GHG and fuel economy standards for cars and light-duty trucks, which suggests a similar rollback of Phase 2 standards for MDT and HDT vehicles may be pursued.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
46 SB 97 AND THE CEQA GUIDELINES UPDATE
Passed in August 2007, SB 97 added Section 21083.05 to the Public Resources Code. The code states “(a) On or before July 1, 2009, the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) shall prepare, develop, and transmit to the Resources Agency guidelines for the mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions as required by this division, including, but not limited to, effects associated with transportation or energy consum ption. (b) On or before January 1, 2010, the Resources Agency shall certify and adopt guidelines prepared and developed by the OPR pursuant to subdivision (a).”
In 2012, Public Resources Code Section 21083.05 was amended to state:
“The Office of Planning and Research and the Natural Resources Agency shall periodically update the guidelines for the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions or the effects of greenhouse gas emissions as required by this division, including, but not limited to, effects associated with transportation or energy consumption, to incorporate new information or criteria established by the State Air Resources Board pursuant to Division 25.5 (commencing with Section 38500) of the Health and Safety Code.”
On December 28, 2018, the Natural Resources Agency announced the OA L approved the amendments to the CEQA Guidelines for implementing C EQA. The CEQA Amendments provide guidance to public agencies regarding the analysis and mitigation of the effects of GHG emissions in CEQA documents. The CEQA Amendments fit within the existing CEQA framework by amending existing CEQA Guidelines to reference climate change.
Section 15064.4 was added the CEQA Guidelines and states that in determining the significance of a project’s GHG emissions, the lead agency should focus its analysis on the reasonably foreseeable incremental contribution of the project’s emissions to the effects of climate change.
A project’s incremental contribution may be cumulatively considerable even if it appea rs relatively insignificant compared to statewide, national, or global emissions. The agency’s analysis should consider a timeframe that is appr opriate for the project. The agency’s analysis also must reasonably reflect evolving scientific knowledge and state regulatory schemes.
Additionally, a lead agency may use a model or methodology to estimate GHG emissions resulting from a project. The lead agency has discretion to select the model or methodology it considers most appropriate to enable decision makers to intelligently take into account the project’s incremental contribution to climate change. The lead agency must support its selection of a model or methodology with substantial evidence. The lead agency should explain the limitations of the particular model or methodology selected for use (42).
2.7.4 R
EGIONAL
The project is within the SCAB, which is under the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD.
SCAQMD
SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SCAB. The SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
47 lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions.
In 2008, SCAQMD formed a Working Group to identify GHG emissions thresholds for land use projects that could be used by local lead agencies in the SCAB. The Working Group developed several different options that are contained in the SCAQMD Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold, which could be applied by lead agencies. The working group has not provided additional guidance since release of the interim guidance in 2008. The SCAQMD Board has not approved the thresholds; however, the Guidance Document provides substantial evidence supporting the approaches to significance of GHG emissions that can be considered by the lead agency in adopting its own threshold. The current interim thresholds consist of the following tiered approach:
• Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption under CEQA.
• Tier 2 consists of determining whether the project is consistent with a GHG reduction plan.
If a project is consistent with a qualifying local GHG reduction plan, it does not have significant GHG emissions.
• Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose, but must be consistent with all projects within its jurisdiction. A project’s construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to the project’s operational emissions. If a project’s emissions are below one of the following screening thresholds, then the project is less than significant:
o Residential and commercial land use: 3,000 MTCO2e/yr
o Industrial land use: 10,000 MTCO2e/yr
o Based on land use type: residential: 3,500 MTCO 2e/yr; commercial: 1,400 MTCO2e/yr; or mixed use: 3,000 MTCO2e/yr
• Tier 4 has the following options:
o Option 1: Reduce Business -as-Usual (BAU) emissions by a certain percentage; this percentage is currently undefined.
o Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures o Option 3: 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and employees: 4.8 MTCO 2e per SP per year for projects and 6.6 MTCO 2e per SP per year for plans;
o Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e per SP per year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e per SP per year for plans
• Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.
The SCAQMD’s interim thresholds used the Executive Order S -3-05-year 2050 goal as the basis for the Tier 3 screening level. Achieving the Executive Order’s objective would contribute to worldwide efforts to cap CO2 concentrations at 450 ppm, thus stabilizing global climate.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
48 SCAQMD only has authority over GHG emissions from development projects that include air quality permits. At this time, it is unknown if the project would include stationary sources of emissions subject to SCAQMD permits. Notwithstanding, if the Project requires a stationary permit, it would be subject to the applicable SCAQMD regulations.
SCAQMD Regulation XXVII, adopted in 2009 includes the following rules:
• Rule 2700 defines terms and post global warming potentials. • Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, establishes a voluntary program to encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified GHG emission reductions in the SCAQMD.
• Rule 2702, GHG Reduction Program created a program to produce GHG emission reductions within the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD would fund projects through contracts in response to requests for proposals or purchase reductions from other parties.
SCAQMD is the agency responsible for air quality planning and regulation in the SCAB. The SCAQMD addresses the impacts to climate change of projects subject to SCAQMD permit as a lead agency if they are the only agency having discretionary approval for the project and acts as a responsible agency when a land use agency must also approve discretionary permits for the project. The SCAQMD acts as an expert commenting agency for impacts to air quality. This expertise carries over to GHG emissions, so the agency helps local land use agencies through the development of models and emission thresholds that can be used to address GHG emissions.
2.8 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
2.8.1 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN MEASURES
Although the City of Moreno Valley General Plan does not identify specific GHG or climate change policies or goal, a number of the measures identified in the General Plan’s Air Quality Element act to reduce or control criteria pollutant emissions and peripherally reduce GHG emissions.
2.8.2 2012 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ENERGY EFFICIENCY, CLIMATE ACTION STRATEGY (CAS) The City of Moreno Valley approved an Energy Efficiency & CAS as well as GHG Analysis on October 9, 2012. The CAS identifies ways that the City can reduce energy and water consumption and GHG emissions as an organization (its employees and the operation of its facilities) and outlines the actions that the City can encourage and community members can employ to reduce their own energy and water consumption and GHG emissions. The policies in the document are to reduce GHG emissions in 2010 by 15% by 2020.
2.8.3 2021 CITY OF MORENO VALLEY CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CAP) Concurrent with development of the City 2040 General Plan Update, the City has prepared a proposed 2021 CAP. As described in the 2040 General Plan Update EIR:
The proposed CAP provides a comprehensive plan for addressing GHG emissions within the Planning Area. The proposed CAP was developed concurrently with the 2021 GPU and reflects that document’s proposed land use and transportation Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
49 strategy. The proposed CAP also evaluates how 2021 GPU goals and policies would affect future GHG emissions within the Planning Area.
The proposed CAP is intended to reinforce the City’s commitment to reducing GHG emissions and demonstrate how the City would comply with state GHG emission reduction standards. As a Qualified GHG Reduction Strategy, the CAP would also enable streamlined environmental review of future development projects in accordance with CEQA. Specifically, the proposed CAP quantifies existing and projected GHG emissions generated by activities within the city and the region through horizon year 2040, and it includes GHG emissions reduction targets for the year 2040. The proposed CAP also contains actions that demonstrate the City’s commitment to achieve state GHG reduction targets through monitoring and reporting processes to ensure that targets are met, and options for reducing GHG emissions beyond state requirements. If the proposed CAP is adopted, projects that demonstrate consistency with the 2021 GPU and CAP would be subject to a streamlined CEQA review process for mitigation of GHG emissions, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5 (2040 General Plan Update EIR, p. 3-22).
As of the time this analysis was prepared the City has not formally adopted or implemented the proposed CAP
4. 4 A screen check draft of the proposed CAP can be accessed at:
https://www.moval.org/cdd/documents/general-plan-update/draft-docs/ClimateActionPlan/Draft-MV-CAP.pdf.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis
14397-05 GHG Report
50 This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
51 3 PROJECT GHG IMPACT
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Project has been evaluated to determine if it will result in a significant GHG impact. The significance of these potential impacts is described in the following sections.
3.2 STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The criteria used to determine the significance of potential Project- related GHG impacts are taken from the Initial Study Checklist in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR of Regulations §§15000, et seq.). Based on these thresholds, a project would result in a significant impact related to GHG if it would (1):
• Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?
• Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs?
The City has determined that each of the CEQA threshold considerations presented herein establish a separate and independent basis upon which to substantiate the significance of the Project’s potential GHG emissions impact.
3.2.1 DISCUSSION ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS The City of Moreno Valley does not have an adopted threshold of significance for GHG emissions.
For CEQA purposes, the City has discretion to select an appropriate significance criterion, based on substantial evidence. The SCAQMD’s adopted numerical threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr for industrial stationary source emissions is selected as the significance criterion. The SCAQMD- adopted industrial threshold was selected by the City because the proposed Project is analogous to an industrial use much more closely than any other land use such as commercial or residential in terms of its expected operating characteristics. The Project proposes a single warehouse building , characteristic of an industrial operation. Further, analysis of the Project’s traffic generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers ( ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017 for industrial and warehouse uses. Also, 10,000 MTCO2e has been used as the significance threshold by many local government lead agencies for logistics projects throughout the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region since the SCAQMD adopted this threshold for its own use. Further, to ensure that the threshold is conservative in its application, although the SCAQMD uses their adopted 10,000 MTCO2e threshold to determine the significance of stationary source emissions for industrial projects, the 10,000 MTCO2e threshold used in this analysis is applied to all sources of Project-related GHG emissions whether stationary source, mobile source, area source, or other.
Use of this threshold is also consistent with guidance provided in the CAPCOA CEQA and Climate Change handbook, as such the City has opted to use a non-zero threshold approach based on Approach 2 of the handbook. Threshold 2.5 (Unit-Based Thresholds Based on Market Capture) establishes a numerical threshold based on capture of approximately 90% of emissions from Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
52 future development. The latest threshold developed by SCAQMD using this method is 10,000 MTCO2e/yr for industrial projects. This threshold is based on the review of 711 CEQA projects .
The SCAQMD found that use of the 10,000 M TCO2e threshold would result in a capture rate of 90% for all new or modified projects. A 90% emission capture rate means that 90% of total emissions from all new or modified stationary source projects would be subject to some type of CEQA analysis.
As such, the SCAQMD’s recommended GHG threshold was established to achieve an emission capture rate of 90% of all new or modified stationary source projects. A GHG significance threshold based on a 90% emission capture rate is appropriate to address the long-term adverse potential impacts associated with GHG emissions. Further, a 90% emission capture rate sets the emission threshold low enough to capture a substantial fraction of future projects that will be constructed to accommodate future statewide popul ation and economic growth, while setting the emission threshold high enough to exclude small projects that will in aggregate contribute a relatively small fraction of the cumulative statewide GHG emissions. This assertion is based on the fact that SCAQMD estimates that these GHG emissions would account for <1% of future 2050 statewide GHG emissions target (85 MMTCO
2e/yr). In addition, these small projects would be
subject to future applicable GHG control regulations that would further reduce their overall future contribution to the statewide GHG inventory (43).
3.3 MODELS EMPLOYED TO ANALYZE GHGS
3.3.1 CALIFORNIA EMISSIONS ESTIMATOR MODEL (CALEEMOD)
In May 2021, t he SCAQMD, in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction- source and operational-source criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources; and quantify applicable air quality and GHG reductions achieved from mitigation measures (44).
Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used for this Project to determine GHG emissions. Output from the model runs for construction and operational activity are provided in Appendices 3.1 through 3. 4. CalEEMod includes GHG emissions from the following source categories: construction, area, energy, mobile, waste, water.
3.4 LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS NOT REQUIRED
A full life ‐cycle analysis (LCA) for construction and operational activity is not included in this analysis due to the lack of consensus guidance on LCA methodology at this time (45). Life‐cycle analysis (i.e., assessing economy‐wide GHG emissions from the processes in manufacturing and transporting all raw materials used in the P roject development, infrastructure, and on -going operations) depends on emission factors or econometric factors that are not well established for all processes. At this time, an LCA would be extremely speculative and thus has not been prepared.
Additionally, the SCAQMD recommends analyzing direct and indirect project GHG emissions generated within California and not life -cycle emissions because the life -cycle effects from a Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
53 project could occur outside of California, might not be very well understood, or documented, and would be challenging to mitigate (46). Additionally, the science to calculate life cycle emissions is not yet established or well defined; therefore, SCAQMD has not recommended, and is not requiring, life-cycle emissions analysis.
3.5 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Project construction actvities would generate CO2 and CH4 emissions The report Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Air Quality Impact Analysis Report (AQIA) contains detailed information regarding Project construction activities (47) . As discussed in the AQIA, Construction related emissions are expected from the following construction activities:
• Site Preparation
• Grading
• Building Construction
• Paving
• Architectural Coating
3.5.1 C ONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction is anticipated to begin in August 2022 and will last through July 2023 . The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in Table 3 -2, represents a “worst- case” analysis scenario should construction occur any time after the respective dates since emission factors for construction decrease as time passes and the analysis year increases due to emission regulations becoming more stringent
5. The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines (48).
TABLE 3-2: CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction Activity Start Date End Date Days
Site Preparation 08/01/2022 08/12/2022 10
Grading 08/13/2022 09/09/2022 20
Building Construction 09/10/2022 07/28/2023 230
Paving 07/03/2023 07/28/2023 20
Architectural Coating 06/05/2023 07/28/2023 40
5 As shown in the CalEEMod User’s Guide Version 2020.4.0, Section 4.3 “OFFROAD Equipment” as the analysis year increases, emission factors for the same equipment pieces decrease due to the natural turnover of older equipment being replaced by newer less polluting equipment and new regulatory requirements.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
54 3.5.2 C ONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Consistent with industry standards and typical construction practices, each piece of equipment listed in Table 3-3 will operate up to a total of eight (8) hours per day, or more than two-thirds of the period during which construction activities are allowed pursuant to the code.
TABLE 3-3: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Construction Activity Equipment Amount Hours Per Day
Site Preparation
Crawler Tractors 4 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Grading
Crawler Tractors 3 8
Excavators 1 8
Graders 1 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Building Construction
Cranes 1 8
Crawler Tractors 3 8
Forklifts 3 8
Generator Sets 1 8
Welders 1 8
Paving
Pavers 2 8
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8
3.5.3 C ONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS SUMMARY
For construction emissions, GHGs are quantified and amortized over the life of the Project. To amortize the emissions over the life of the Project, the SCAQMD recommends calculating the total GHG emissions for the construction activities, dividing it by a 30-year Project life then adding that number to the annual operational phase GHG emissions (49) . As such, construction emissions were amortized over a 30-year period and added to the annual operational phase GHG emissions. The amortized construction emissions are presented in Table 3-4.
TABLE 3-4: AMORTIZED ANNUAL CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Year
Emissions (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O Total CO2e6
2022 323.67 0.06 8.54E-03 327.80
6 CalEEMod reports the most common GHGs emitted which include CO2, CH4, and N2O. These GHGs are then converted into the CO2e by multiplying the individual GHG by the GWP.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
55 2023 509.54 0.09 0.02 516.17
Total GHG Emissions 833.22 0.15 0.02 843.97
Amortized Construction Emissions (MTCO2e) 27.77 4.99E-03 7.85E-04 28.13 Source CalEEMod annual construction-source emissions are presented in Appendix 3.1.
3.6 OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS
Operational activities associated with the Project will result in emissions of CO 2, CH4, and N 2O from the following primary sources:
• Area Source Emissions
• Energy Source Emissions
• Mobile Source Emissions
• On-Site Cargo Handling Equipment Emissions
• Transportation Refrigeration Units (TRU) Emissions
• Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution
• Solid Waste
3.6.1 AREA SOURCE EMISSIONS
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT
Landscape maintenance equipment would generate emissions from fuel combustion and evaporation of unburned fuel. Equipment in this category would include lawnmowers, shedders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers used to maintain the landscaping of the Project. It should be noted that as October 9, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 1346. The bill aims to ban the sale of new gasoline-powered equipment under 25 gross horsepower (known as small off- road engines [SOREs]) by 2024. For purposes of analysis, t he emissions associated with landscape maintenance equipment were calculated based on assumptions provided in CalEEMod.
3.6.2 E
NERGY SOURCE EMISSIONS
COMBUSTION EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH NATURAL GAS AND ELECTRICITY Electricity and natural gas are used by almost every project. Criteria pollutant emissions are emitted through the generation of electricity and consumption of natural gas. However, because electrical generating facilities for the Project area are located either outside the region (state) or offset through the use of pollution credits (RECLAIM) for generation within the SCAB, criteria pollutant emissions from offsite generation of electricity are generally excluded from the evaluation of significance and only natural gas use is considered. Based on information provided by the Project Applicant, the Project would not utilize natural gas and therefore no air quality emissions from energy sources would occur.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
56 3.6.3 M OBILE SOURCE EMISSIONS
The Project GHG emissions derive primarily from vehicle trips generated by the Project, including employee trips to and from the site and truck trips associated with the proposed uses. Trip characteristics available from the Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Trip Generation and VMT7 Analysis were utilized in this analysis (50).
APPROACH FOR ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT
In order to determine emissions from passenger car vehicles, the CalEEMod defaults were utilized for trip length and trip purpose for the proposed industrial land uses.
For the proposed industrial uses, it is important to note that although the Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Trip Generation Assessment and VMT does not breakdown passenger cars by type, this analysis assumes that passenger cars include Light -Duty-Auto vehicles (LDA), Light -Duty- Trucks (LDT18 & LDT29), Medium-Duty-Vehicles (MDV), and Motorcycles (MCY) vehicle types. In order to account for emissions generated by passenger cars, the following fleet mix was utilized in this analysis:
TABLE 3-5: PASSENGER CAR FLEET MIX
Land Use
% Vehicle Type
LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV MCY
Manufacturing
57.60% 6.03% 18.59% 15.19% 2.59% Warehousing
High-Cube Cold Storage
Note: The Project-specific passenger car fleet mix used in this analysis is based on a proportional split utilizing the default CalEEMod percentages assigned to LDA, LDT1, LDT2, and MDV vehicle types.
To determine emissions from trucks for the proposed industrial uses , the analysis incorporated the SCAQMD recommended truck trip length of 40 miles 10 and an assumption of 100% primary trips for the proposed industrial land uses.
In order to be consistent with the Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Trip Generation Assessment and VMT, trucks are broken down by truck type. The truck fleet mix is estimated by rationing the trip rates for each truck type based on information provided in the Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Trip Generation Assessment and VMT. Heavy trucks are broken down by truck type (or axle type) and are categorized as either Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (LHDT111 & LHDT2
7 VMT = Vehicle Miles Traveled
8 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less than or equal to 3,750 lbs.
9 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs. 10 The average trip length for heavy trucks were based on the SCAQMD documents for the implementation of the Facility -Based Mobile Source Measures (FBMSMs) adopted in the 2016 AQMP. SCAQMD’s “Preliminary Warehouse Emission Calculations” cites 39.9 -mile trip length for heavy-heavy trucks (41). As a conservative measure, a trip length of 40 miles has been utilized for all trucks for the purpose of this analysis (39) 11 Vehicles under the LHDT1 category have a GVWR of 8,501 to 10,000 lbs.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
57 12)/2-axle, Medium- Heavy-Duty Trucks (MHDT) /3-axle, and Heavy -Heavy-Duty Trucks (HHDT)/4+-axle. In order to account for emissions generated by trucks, the following fleet mix was utilized in this analysis:
TABLE 3-6: TRUCK FLEET MIX
Land Use
% Vehicle Type
LHDT1 LHDT2 MHDT HHDT
Manufacturing 9.81% 2.69% 25.00% 62.50%
Warehousing 13.35% 3.67% 21.28% 61.70%
High-Cube Cold Storage 43.58% 11.98% 22.22% 22.22%
Note: Project-specific truck fleet mix is based on the number of trips generated by each truck type (LHDT1, LHDT2, MHDT, and HHDT) relative to the total number of truck trips.
3.6.4 O N-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT EMISSIONS
It is common for warehouse buildings to require the operation of exterior cargo handling equipment in the building’s truck court areas . For this particular Project, on -site modeled operational equipment includes up to one (1 ) 200 horsepower (hp), compressed natural gas or gasoline-powered tractors/loaders/backhoes operating at 4 hours a day 13 for 365 days of the year.
3.6.5 TRU EMISSIONS
In order to account for the possibility of refrigerated uses, trucks associated with the cold-storage land use are assumed to also have TRUs. Therefore, for modeling purposes 9 two-way truck trips have the potential to include TRUs. TRUs are accounted for during on-site and off-site travel. The TRU calculations are based on the 2017 Off- road Emissions model, version 1.0.1 (Orion), developed by the CARB. Orion does not provide emission rates per hour or mile as with the on- road emission model and only provides emission inventories. Emission results are produced in tons per day while all activity, fuel consumption and horsepower hours were reported at annual levels. The emission inventory is based on specific assumptions including the average horsepower rating of specific types of equipment and the hours of operation annually. These assumptions are not always consistent with assumptions used in the modeling of project level emissions. Therefore, the emissions inventory was converted into emission rates to accurately calculate emissions from TRU operation associated with project level details. This was accomplished by converting the annual horsepower hours to daily operational characteristics and converting the daily emission levels into hourly emission rat es based on the total emission of each criteria pollutant by equipment type and the average daily hours of operation.
12 Vehicles under the LHDT2 category have a GVWR of 10,001 to 14,000 lbs. 13 Based on Table II-3, Port and Rail Cargo Handling Equipment Demographics by Type, from CARB’s Technology Assessment: Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment document, a single piece of equipment could operate up to 2 hours per day (Total Average Annual Activity divided by Total Number Pieces of Equipment). As such, the analysis conservatively assumes that the tractor/loader/backhoe would operate up to 4 hours per day.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
58 3.6.6 W ATER SUPPLY, TREATMENT AND DISTRIBUTION
Indirect GHG emissions result from the production of electricity used to convey, treat, and distribute water and wastewater. The amount of electricity required to convey, treat, and distribute water depends on the volume of water as well as the sources of the water. Unless otherwise noted, CalEEMod default parameters were used.
3.6.7 S OLID WASTE
Industrial land uses will result in the generation and disposal of solid waste. A percentage of this waste will be diverted from landfills by a variety of means, such as reducing the amount of waste generated, recycling, and/or composting. The remainder of the waste not diverted will be disposed of at a landfill. GHG emissions from landfills are associated with the anaerobic breakdown of material. GHG emissions associated with the disposal of solid waste associated with the proposed Project were calculated by CalEEMod using default parameters.
3.6.8 E
MISSIONS SUMMARY
The annual GHG emissions associated with the Project are summarized in Table 3-7. As shown in Table 3 -7, construction and operation of the Project would generate a total of 2,813.72 MTCO2e/yr.
TABLE 3-7: PROJECT SCENARIO GHG EMISSIONS
Emission Source
Emissions (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O Total CO2e
Annual construction-related emissions
amortized over 30 years 27.77 4.99E-03 7.85E-04 28.13
Area Source 0.02 4.00E-05 0.00 0.02
Energy Source 522.61 0.03 6.68E-03 525.44
Mobile Source 1,826.27 0.04 0.22 1,892.88
TRU Source 19.24
On-Site Equipment 50.75 0.02 0.00 51.16
Waste 44.07 2.60 0.00 109.17
Water Usage 133.86 1.67 0.04 187.67
Total CO2e (All Sources) 2,813.72
Source: CalEEMod output, See Appendices 3.1 and 3.4 for detailed model outputs.
3.7 GHG EMISSIONS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
3.7.1 GHG IMPACT 1
Potential to generate direct or indirect GHG emissions that would result in a significant impact on the environment.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
59 As shown on Table 3-6, the Project will result in a net total of approximately 2,813.72 MTCO2/yr; the proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD/City’s screening threshold of 10,000 MTCO2e/yr. Thus, the Project would not have the potential to result in a cumulatively considerable impact with respect to GHG emissions . As such, a less than significant impact is expected.
3.7.2 GHG IMPACT 2
The Project would have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs.
As previously stated, pursuant to 15604.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, a lead agency may rely on qualitative analysis or performance -based standards to determine the significance of impacts from GHG emissions (48). As such, the Project’s consistency with SB 32 (2017 Scoping Plan), is discussed below. It Consistency with AB 32 and the 2008 Scoping Plan is not necessary, since the target year for AB 32 and the 2008 Scoping Plan was 2020, and the Project’s buildout year is 2023.
As such the 2008 Scoping Plan does not apply and consistency with the 2017 Scoping Plan is relevant. Project consistency with SB 32 and City’s General Plan Measures, Energy Efficiency, and CAS is evaluated in the following discussion.
SB
32/2017 SCOPING PLAN CONSISTENCY
The 2017 Scoping Plan Update reflects the 2030 target of a 40% reduction below 1990 levels, set by Executive Order B-30-15 and codified by SB 32. Table 3-8 summarizes the Project’s consistency with the 2017 Scoping Plan. As summarized, the Project will not conflict with any of the provisions of the Scoping Plan and in fact supports seven of the action categories.
TABLE 3-8: 2017 SCOPING PLAN CONSISTENCY SUMMARY14
Action Responsible Parties Consistency
Implement SB 350 by 2030
Increase the Renewables Portfolio
Standard to 50% of retail sales by 2030 and
ensure grid reliability.
CPUC,
CEC,
CARB
Consistent. The Project would use energy
from Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE
has committed to diversify its portfolio of
energy sources by increasing energy from
wind and solar sources. The Project
would not interfere with or obstruct SCE
energy source diversification efforts.
Establish annual targets for statewide
energy efficiency savings and demand
reduction that will achieve a cumulative
doubling of statewide energy efficiency
savings in electricity and natural gas end
uses by 2030.
Consistent. The Project would be designed
and constructed to implement the energy
efficiency measures for new industrial
developments and would include several
measures designed to reduce energy
consumption. The Project would not
interfere with or obstruct policies or
strategies to establish annual targets for
14 Measures can be found at the following link: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
60 Action Responsible Parties Consistency
statewide energy efficiency savings and
demand reduction.
Reduce GHG emissions in the electricity
sector through the implementation of the
above measures and other actions as
modeled in Integrated Resource Planning
(IRP) to meet GHG emissions reductions
planning targets in the IRP process. Load-
serving entities and publicly- owned
utilities meet GHG emissions reductions
planning targets through a combination of
measures as described in IRPs.
Consistent. The proposed Project would
be designed and constructed to
implement the energy efficiency
measures, where applicable by including
several measures designed to reduce
energy consumption. The proposed
Project includes energy efficient field
lighting and fixtures that meet the current
Title 24 Standards throughout the Project
Site and would be a modern development
with energy efficient boilers, heaters, and
air conditioning systems.
Implement Mobile Source Strategy (Cleaner Technology and Fuels)
At least 1.5 million zero emission and plug-
in hybrid light-duty EVs by 2025.
CARB,
California State
Transportation
Agency (CalSTA),
Strategic Growth
Council (SGC),
California
Department of
Transportation
(Caltrans),
CEC,
OPR,
Local Agencies
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB zero emission and
plug-in hybrid light-duty EV 2025 targets.
As this is a CARB enforced standard,
vehicles that access the Project are
required to comply with the standards
and will therefore comply with the
strategy.
At least 4.2 million zero emission and plug-
in hybrid light-duty EVs by 2030.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB zero emission and
plug-in hybrid light-duty EV 2030 targets.
As this is a CARB enforced standard,
vehicles that access the Project are
required to comply with the standards
and will therefore comply with the
strategy.
Further increase GHG stringency on all
light-duty vehicles beyond existing
Advanced Clean cars regulations.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB efforts to further
increase GHG stringency on all light-duty
vehicles beyond existing Advanced Clean
cars regulations. As this is a CARB
enforced standard, vehicles that access
the Project are required to comply with
the standards and will therefore comply
with the strategy.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
61 Action Responsible Parties Consistency
Medium- and Heavy-Duty GHG Phase 2.
Consistent. This is a CARB Mobile Source
Strategy. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere with CARB efforts to
implement Medium- and Heavy-Duty GHG
Phase 2. As this is a CARB enforced
standard, vehicles that access the Project
are required to comply with the standards
and will therefore comply with the
strategy.
Innovative Clean Transit: Transition to a
suite of to-be-determined innovative clean
transit options. Assumed 20% of new urban
buses purchased beginning in 2018 will be
zero emission buses with the penetration
of zero-emission technology ramped up to
100% of new sales in 2030. Also, new
natural gas buses, starting in 2018, and
diesel buses, starting in 2020, meet the
optional heavy-duty low-NOX standard.
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of SB 375 and would therefore not conflict
with this measure.
Last Mile Delivery: New regulation that
would result in the use of low NO
X or
cleaner engines and the deployment of
increasing numbers of zero-emission trucks
primarily for class 3-7 last mile delivery
trucks in California. This measure assumes
ZEVs comprise 2.5% of new Class 3–7 truck
sales in local fleets starting in 2020,
increasing to 10% in 2025 and remaining
flat through 2030.
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of SB 375 and would therefore not conflict
with this measure.
Further reduce VMT through continued
implementation of SB 375 and regional
Sustainable Communities Strategies;
forthcoming statewide implementation of
SB 743; and potential additional VMT
reduction strategies not specified in the
Mobile Source Strategy but included in the
document “Potential VMT Reduction
Strategies for Discussion.”
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of SB 375 and would therefore not conflict
with this measure.
Increase stringency of SB 375 Sustainable
Communities Strategy (2035 targets).
CARB
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of SB 375 and would therefore not conflict
with this measure.
Harmonize project performance with
emissions reductions and increase
competitiveness of transit and active
transportation modes (e.g., via guideline
CalSTA,
SGC,
OPR,
CARB,
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere with agency efforts
to harmonize transportation facility
project performance with emissions
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
62 Action Responsible Parties Consistency
documents, funding programs, project
selection, etc.).
Governor’s Office of
Business and
Economic
Development (GO-
Biz),
California
Infrastructure and
Economic
Development Bank
(IBank),
Department of
Finance (DOF),
California
Transportation
Commission (CTC),
Caltrans
reductions and increase competitiveness
of transit and active transportation
modes.
By 2019, develop pricing policies to support
low-GHG transportation (e.g., low-emission
vehicle zones for heavy duty, road user,
parking pricing, transit discounts).
CalSTA,
Caltrans,
CTC,
OPR,
SGC,
CARB
Consistent. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere with agency efforts
to develop pricing policies to support low-
GHG transportation.
Implement California Sustainable Freight Action Plan
Improve freight system efficiency.
CalSTA,
CalEPA,
CNRA,
CARB,
Caltrans,
CEC,
GO-Biz
Consistent. This measure would apply to
all trucks accessing the Project site, this
may include existing trucks or new trucks
that are part of the statewide goods
movement sector. The Project would not
obstruct or interfere with agency efforts
to Improve freight system efficiency.
Deploy over 100,000 freight vehicles and
equipment capable of zero emission
operation and maximize both zero and
near-zero emission freight vehicles and
equipment powered by renewable energy
by 2030.
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure.
Adopt a Low Carbon Fuel Standard with a
Carbon Intensity reduction of 18%.
CARB
Consistent. When adopted, this measure
would apply to all fuel purchased and
used by the Project in the state. The
Project would not obstruct or interfere
with agency efforts to adopt a Low Carbon
Fuel Standard with a Carbon Intensity
reduction of 18%.
Implement the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy (SLPS) by 2030 Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
63 Action Responsible Parties Consistency
40% reduction in methane and
hydrofluorocarbon emissions below 2013
levels.
CARB,
CalRecycle,
CDFA,
California State
Water Resource
Control Board
(SWRCB),
Local Air Districts
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure. 50% reduction in black carbon emissions below 2013 levels.
By 2019, develop regulations and programs
to support organic waste landfill reduction
goals in the SLCP and SB 1383.
CARB,
CalRecycle,
CDFA,
SWRCB,
Local Air Districts
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure.
Implement the post-2020 Cap-and-Trade
Program with declining annual caps. CARB
Consistent. The Project would be required
to comply with any applicable Cap-and-
Trade Program provisions. The Project
would not obstruct or interfere agency
efforts to implement the post-2020 Cap-
and-Trade Program.
By 2018, develop Integrated Natural and Working Lands Implementation Plan to secure California’s land base as a net carbon sink
Protect land from conversion through
conservation easements and other
incentives.
CNRA,
Departments
Within
CDFA,
CalEPA,
CARB
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure. Moreover, the Project
site is not an identified property that
needs to be conserved.
Increase the long-term resilience of carbon
storage in the land base and enhance
sequestration capacity
Consistent. The Project site is vacant
disturbed property and does not comprise
an area that would effectively provide for
carbon sequestration. The Project would
not obstruct or interfere agency efforts to
increase the long-term resilience of
carbon storage in the land base and
enhance sequestration capacity.
Utilize wood and agricultural products to
increase the amount of carbon stored in
the natural and built environments
Consistent. Where appropriate, Project
designs will incorporate wood or wood
products. The Project would not obstruct
or interfere agency efforts to encourage
use of wood and agricultural products to
increase the amount of carbon stored in
the natural and built environments.
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
64 Action Responsible Parties Consistency
Establish scenario projections to serve as
the foundation for the Implementation
Plan
Establish a carbon accounting framework
for natural and working lands as described
in SB 859 by 2018
CARB
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure.
Implement Forest Carbon Plan
CNRA,
California
Department of
Forestry and Fire
Protection
(CAL FIRE),
CalEPA and
Departments Within
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure.
Identify and expand funding and financing
mechanisms to support GHG reductions
across all sectors.
State Agencies &
Local Agencies
Consistent. This Project would not
obstruct or interfere with implementation
of this measure.
As shown above, the Project would not conflict with any of the 2017 Scoping Plan elements as any regulations adopted would apply directly or indirectly to the Project. Further, recent studies show that the State’s existing and proposed regulatory framework will allow the State to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 (37).
C
ITY OF MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN MEASURES CONSISTENCY
As previously stated, the City of Moreno Valley General Plan does not identify specific GHG or climate change policies or goal, a number of the measures identified in the General Plan’s Air Quality Element act to reduce or control criteria pollutant emissions and peripherally reduce GHG emissions. As shown on Table 3-9, the Project has been evaluated for consistency with the City’s General Plan Air Quality Element.
TABLE 3-9: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY Objective/Policy Project Consistency
Objective 6.6: Promote land use patterns that reduce
daily automotive trips and reduce trip distance for
work, shopping, school, and recreation.
Consistent. The Project site is providing employment
opportunities to Moreno Valley and the surrounding
area.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
65 Objective 6.7: Reduce mobile and stationary source
air pollutant emissions.
Consistent. The Project site is located proximate to
existing and proposed major roadways, acting to
generally reduce vehicle trip lengths, thereby reducing mobile source emissions. The Project will further
reduce mobile source emissions by creating local
employment opportunities, reducing commuter VMT
within the region. Additionally, the Project will
implement energy efficient designs and operational
programs meeting or surpassing California Code of
Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Building Standards,
including but not limited to compliance with or
betterment of, energy conservation requirements
identified at CCR Title 24, Part 6, Energy Code. Energy efficient designs and programs implemented by the
Project reduce resources consumption with
correlating reductions in stationary-source emissions.
Policy 6.7.5: Require grading activities to comply with SCAQMD District’s Rule 403 regarding the control of
fugitive dust.
Consistent. The Project will be required to implement
fugitive dust control measures consistent with
SCAQMD Rule 403.
Policy 6.7.6: Require building construction to comply
with the energy conservation requirements of Title 24
of the California Administrative Code [CCR].
Consistent. Pursuant to City and State Building Code
requirements, the Project will meet or surpass
applicable CCR Title 24 energy conservation
requirements.
Source: City of Moreno Valley General Plan, Safety Element
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND CAS CONSISTENCY The City of Moreno Valley released an Energy Efficiency and CAS as well as a GHG Analysis for public review on May 8, 2012. The documents were approved on October 9, 2012. The CAS identifies ways that the City can reduce energy and water consumption and GHG emissions as an organization (its employ ees and the operation of its facilities) and outlines the actions that the City can encourage and community memb ers can em ploy to reduce their own energy and water consumption and GHG emissions. The policies in the document are to reduce GHG emissions in 2010 by 15% by 2020. The following table consists of an analysis of Project consistency with the policies in the CAS.
TABLE 3-10: CITY OF MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY Objective/Policy Project Consistency
R2-T1: Land Use Based Trips and VMT Reduction
Policies.
Encourage the development of Transit Priority
Projects along High-Quality Transit Corridors
Consistent. The Project site is located proximate to
existing and proposed major roadways, acting to
generally reduce vehicle trip lengths, thereby reducing mobile source emissions. The Project will further
reduce mobile source emissions by creating local
employment opportunities, reducing commuter VMT
within the region.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
66 Objective/Policy Project Consistency
identified in the SCAG Sustainable Communities Plan,
to allow a reduction in VMT.
R2-T3: Employment-Based Trip Reductions.
Require a Transportation Demand Management
(TDM) program for new development to reduce
automobile travel by encouraging ride-sharing,
carpooling, and alternative modes of transportation.
Consistent. Consistent with City Conditions of
Approval, the Project would implement appropriate
Transportation Demand Management measures.
R2-E1: New Construction Residential Energy
Efficiency Requirements.
Require energy efficient design for all new residential buildings to be 10% beyond the current Title 24
standards.
Consistent. This Project would not obstruct or
interfere with implementation of this measure.
R2-E2: New Construction Residential Renewable
Energy.
Facilitate the use of renewable energy (such as solar
(photovoltaic) panels or small wind turbines) for new
residential developments. Alternative approach
would be the purchase of renewable energy
resources offsite.
Consistent. This Project would not obstruct or
interfere with implementation of this measure.
R2-E5: New Construction Commercial Energy
Efficiency Requirements.
Require energy efficient design for all new
commercial buildings to be 10% beyond the 2008
Title 24 standards (which were in effect at the time
the CAP was adopted).
Consistent. Current Title 24 requirements would
achieve greater reduction than envisioned by the
City’s CAS. Further, the Project would be required to
comply with any adopted municipal code
requirements set forth by the City of Moreno Valley.
R3-E1: Energy Efficient Development, and
Renewable Energy Deployment Facilitation and
Streamlining.
Updating of codes and zoning requirements and
guidelines to further implement green building
practices. This could include incentives for energy
efficient projects.
Consistent. This Project would not obstruct or
interfere with implementation of this measure.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
67 Objective/Policy Project Consistency
R3-L2: Heat Island Plan. Develop measures that
address “heat islands.”
Potential measures include using strategically placed
shade trees, using paving materials with a Solar
Reflective Index of at least 29, an open grid
pavement system, or covered parking.
Consistent. The Project will comply with the City of
Moreno Valley’s landscaping requirements.
R2-W1: Water Use Reduction Initiative.
Consider adopting a per capita water use reduction
goal, which mandates the reduction of water use of
20% per capita with requirements applicable to new
development and with cooperative support of the
water agencies.
Consistent. The project is required to comply with
California Green Building Standards Code, Chapter 5,
Division 5.3, Section 5.303.2. The cited Standards
mandate that indoor water use be reduced by 20%.
Section 5.304.3 requires irrigation controllers and
sensors.
R3-W1: Water Efficiency Training and Education.
Work with EMWD and local water companies to
implement a public information and education
program that promotes water conservation.
Consistent. This Project would not obstruct or
interfere with implementation of this measure.
R2-S1: City Diversion Program.
For Solid Waste, consider a target of increasing the
waste diverted from the landfill to a total of 75% by
2020.
Consistent. The Project will comply with the City of
Moreno Valley’s citywide goal of solid waste
reduction. Additionally, the Project will be compliant
with the City of Moreno Valley’s Municipal Code
8.80.030 by implementing a Waste Management Plan.
Source: City of Moreno Valley General Plan, Safety Element Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
68 This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
69 4 REFERENCES
1. State of California. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020.
2. Air Resources Board. Assembly Bill 32: Global Warming Solutions Act. [Online] 2006. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ab32/ab32.htm.
3. —. Sustainable Communities. [Online] 2008. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375.htm.
4. —. Clean Car Standards - Pavley, Assembly Bill 1493. [Online] September 24, 2009. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ccms/ccms.htm.
5. Building Standards Commission. California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). [Online] http://www.bsc.ca.gov/codes.aspx.
6. California Energy Commission. California Code of Regulations, TITLE 20, Division 2. [Online] September 3, 2013. http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/title20/index.html.
7. Air Resources Board. Title 17 - California Code of Regulation. [Online] 2010. http://www.arb.ca.gov/regs/regs-17.htm.
8. Department of Water Resources. Updated Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance AB 1881. [Online] 2006. [Cited: November 13, 2013.]
http://www.water.ca.gov/wateruseefficiency/landscapeordinance/updatedOrd_history.cfm.
9. California Energy Commission. SB 1368 Emission Performance Standards. [Online] September 29, 2006. http://www.energy.ca.gov/emission_standards/.
10. —. Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). [Online] 2002. http://www.energy.ca.gov/portfolio/.
11. California Legislative Information. Senate Bill No. 32. [Online] September 8, 2016. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB32.
12. City of Moreno Valley. City of Moreno Valley General Plan. 2006.
13. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Greenhouse Gases - Water Vapor. NOAA National Centers For Environmental Information. [Online] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring- references/faq/greenhouse-gases.php?section=watervapor.
14. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report. International Panel on Climate Change. 4, 2007.
15. The Carbon Cycle and Climate Change. Bennington, Bret J. 1, s.l. : Brooks/Cole. ISBN 1 3: 978-0-495- 73855-8.
16. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Carbon Dioxide. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0103.html.
17. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Greenhouse Gases - Methane. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. [Online] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring- references/faq/greenhouse-gases.php?section=methane.
18. World Resources Institute. Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT). [Online] http://cait.wri.org.
19. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Greenhouse Gases - Chlorofluorocarbons. NOAA National Centers For Environmental Information. [Online] https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring- references/faq/greenhouse-gases.php?section=chlorofluorocarbons.
20. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Regulation for Reducting Sulfur Hexafluoride Emissions from Gas Insulated Switchgear. Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] May 7, 2014.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
70 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-02/documents/mehl-arb-presentation-2014- wkshp.pdf.
21. World Resources Institute. Nitrogen Trifluoride Now Required in GHG Protocol Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory. [Online] May 22, 2013. https://www.wri.org/blog/2013/05/nitrogen- trifluoride-now-required-ghg-protocol-greenhouse-gas-emissions-inventories.
22. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nitrogen Trifluoride. PubChem Compound Database. [Online] https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/24553 .
23. American Lung Association. Climate Change. [Online] http://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy- air/outdoor/climate-change/.
24. Barbara H. Allen-Diaz. Climate change affects us all. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources. [Online] April 1, 2009. http://calag.ucanr.edu/Archive/?article=ca.v063n02p51.
25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013 The Physical Science Basis - Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. AR5 Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. [Online] September 2013. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_all_final.pdf.
26. United Nations. GHG Profiles - Annex I. [Online] http://di.unfccc.int/ghg_profile_annex1.
27. —. GHG Profiles - Non-Annex I. [Online] http://di.unfccc.int/ghg_profile_non_annex1.
28. World Resources Institute. Climate Analysis Indicator Tool (CAIT). [Online] http://cait.wri.org.
29. Air Resources Board. 2020 GHG Inventory. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory 2000-2019 Edition. [Online]
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/pubs/reports/2000_2019/ghg_inventory_trends_00-19.pdf.
30. California Energy Commission. Our Changing Climate Assessing the Risks to California. 2006.
31. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES). Outcomes of the U.N. Climate Change Conference.
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES). [Online] 2015. http://www.c2es.org/international/negotiations/cop21-paris/summary.
32. Agency, United States Environmental Protection. Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under the Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. United States Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] 2020. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/endangerment-and-cause-or- contribute-findings-greenhouse-gases-under-section-202a-clean.
33. Federal Register. Mid-Term Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Year 2022-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles. [Online] 2018.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/04/13/2018-07364/mid-term-evaluation-of- greenhouse-gas-emissions-standards-for-model-year-2022-2025-light-duty.
34. Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety. SAFE: The Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient 'SAFE' Vehicle Rule. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Online] 2020. https://www.nhtsa.gov/corporate-average-fuel-economy/safe.
35. United States Environmental Protection Agency. SmartWay. [Online] 2017. https://www.epa.gov/smartway/learn-about-smartway.
36. California Air Resources Board. California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan . [Online] 2017. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017_es.pdf.
37. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. California's Policies Can Significantly Cut Greenhouse Gas Emissions through 2030. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. [Online] January 22, 2015.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
71 http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/01/22/californias-policies-can-significantly-cut-greenhouse-gas- emissions-2030/.
38. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Modeling California policy impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. [Online] 2015. https://eaei.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-7008e.pdf.
39. California Air Resources Board. Legal Disclaimer & User's Notice. [Online] April 2019. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/capandtrade/capandtrade/ct_reg_unofficial.pdf.
40. —. Climate Change Scoping Plan. [Online] 2014.
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_scoping_plan.p df.
41. —. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. [Online] December 2019. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/lcfs.htm.
42. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2018 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2018.
43. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. [Online] http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg- meeting-8/ghg-meeting-8-minutes.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
44. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). [Online] September 2016. www.caleemod.com.
45. California Natural Resources Agency. Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB97. [Online] December 2009.
46. Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance. South Coast Air Quality Managment District. 2008.
47. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Air Quality Impact Analysis Report. 2021.
48. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.
49. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #13. [Powerpoint] Diamond Bar : s.n., 2009.
50. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Trip Generation Assessment and VMT. 2021.
51. Air Resources Board. 2019 GHG Inventory. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory 2000-2017 Edition. [Online] [Cited: September 19, 2019.] http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm.
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
72 This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
73 5 CERTIFICATIONS
The contents of this GHG study report represent an accurate depiction of the GHG impacts associated with the proposed Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Project. The information contained in this GHG report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected].
Haseeb Qureshi
Associate Principal
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.
[email protected]
EDUCATION
Master of Science in Environmental Studies
California State University, Fullerton • May 2010
Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California, Irvine • June, 2006
P
ROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
AEP – Association of Environmental Planners
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011 Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008 Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – California Air Resources Board • August 2007 AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006 Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006 Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
APPENDIX 3.1:
CALEEMOD CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) Riverside-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total Project area is 9.98 acres
Construction Phase - Construction anticipated to begin August 2022 and end in July 2023 Off-road Equipment - Hours are based on an 8-hour workday Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment - Crawler Tractors used in lieu of Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Manufacturing
33.06 1000sqft
0.76 33,060.00
0 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
33.06 1000sqft
0.76 33,060.00
0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
154.27
1000sqft
3.54 154,270.00
0 Other Asphalt Surfaces
173.37
1000sqft
3.98 173,366.00
0 Parking Lot
134.00
Space
0.94 41,076.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.4 28
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2023
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98
0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Trips and VMT - Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction
Grading - This analysis conservatively assumes that the entire Project site (approximately 10 acres) can be disturbed per day Architectural Coating - Rule 1113
Vehicle Trips - Construction run only
Energy Use - Construction run only
Water And Wastewater - Construction run only
Solid Waste - Construction run only
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Rule 403
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitecturalCoating
EF_Nonresidential_Exterior
100.00
50.00 tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00 40.00
tblEnergyUse
LightingElect
2.93 0.00
tblEnergyUse
LightingElect
0.35 0.00
tblEnergyUse
LightingElect
2.37 0.00
tblEnergyUse
LightingElect
1.17 0.00
tblEnergyUse
NT24E
5.02 0.00
tblEnergyUse
NT24E
36.52 0.00
tblEnergyUse
NT24E
0.82 0.00
tblEnergyUse
NT24NG
17.13 0.00
tblEnergyUse
NT24NG
48.51 0.00
tblEnergyUse
NT24NG
0.03 0.00
tblEnergyUse
T24E
1.97 0.00
tblEnergyUse
T24E
0.95 0.00
tblEnergyUse
T24E
0.33 0.00
tblEnergyUse
T24NG
15.20 0.00
tblEnergyUse
T24NG
3.22 0.00
tblEnergyUse
T24NG
1.98 0.00
tblGrading
AcresOfGrading
50.00 200.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblGrading
AcresOfGrading
35.00 100.00
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
53,600.00
41,076.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
1.21 0.94
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
4.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
6.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00 8.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
UsageHours
7.00 8.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
40.99 0.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
31.08 0.00
tblSolidWaste
SolidWasteGenerationRate
145.01
0.00 tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT
VendorTripNumber
71.00 63.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TL
8.40 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CC_TTP
28.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TL
6.90 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TTP
13.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TTP
41.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CNW_TTP
41.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TTP
59.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TTP
59.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TTP
59.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
DV_TP
5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
DV_TP
5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
DV_TP
5.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
PB_TP
3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
PB_TP
3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
PB_TP
3.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
PR_TP
92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
PR_TP
92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
PR_TP
92.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.42 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
1.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.09 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.74 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
3.93 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
2.12 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
1.74 0.00
tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,645,125.00
0.00 tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
7,645,125.00
0.00 tblWater
IndoorWaterUseRate
35,674,937.50
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.0 Emissions Summary
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022
0.1941
1.9164
1.2580
3.6300e-
003
0.4091
0.0773
0.4863
0.1267
0.0718
0.1985
0.0000
323.6733
323.6733
0.0633
8.5400e-
003
327.7983
2023
1.1895
2.2991
2.0185
5.6900e-
003
0.1905
0.0929
0.2834
0.0513
0.0867
0.1380
0.0000
509.5452
509.5452
0.0863
0.0150
516.1715
Maximum
1.1895
2.2991
2.0185
5.6900e-
003
0.4091
0.0929
0.4863
0.1267
0.0867
0.1985
0.0000
509.5452
509.5452
0.0863
0.0150
516.1715
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022
0.1941
1.9164
1.2580
3.6300e-
003
0.2202
0.0773
0.2975
0.0658
0.0718
0.1376
0.0000
323.6730
323.6730
0.0633
8.5400e-
003
327.7980
2023
1.1895
2.2991
2.0185
5.6900e-
003
0.1905
0.0929
0.2834
0.0513
0.0867
0.1380
0.0000
509.5448
509.5448
0.0863
0.0150
516.1712
Maximum
1.1895
2.2991
2.0185
5.6900e-
003
0.2202
0.0929
0.2975
0.0658
0.0867
0.1380
0.0000
509.5448
509.5448
0.0863
0.0150
516.1712
Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
31.50 0.00
24.54 34.25
0.00 18.11
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 8-1-2022
10-31-2022
1.2866
1.2866
2 11-1-2022
1-31-2023
1.1528
1.1528
3 2-1-2023
4-30-2023
1.0181
1.0181
4 5-1-2023
7-31-2023
2.0604
2.0604
Highest
2.0604
2.0604
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Energy
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mobile
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Energy
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mobile
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
Site Preparation
8/1/2022
8/12/2022
5 10
2 Grading
Grading
8/13/2022
9/9/2022
5 20
3 Building Construction
Building Construction
9/10/2022
7/28/2023
5 230
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4 Architectural Coating
Architectural Coating
6/5/2023
7/28/2023
5 40
5 Paving
Paving
7/3/2023
7/28/2023
5 20
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Site Preparation
Crawler Tractors
4 8.00
212
0.43 Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8.00
247
0.40 Site Preparation
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
0 8.00
97 0.37
Grading
Crawler Tractors
3 8.00
212
0.43 Grading
Excavators
1 8.00
158
0.38 Grading
Graders
1 8.00
187
0.41 Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8.00
247
0.40 Grading
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
0 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Cranes
1 8.00
231
0.29 Building Construction
Crawler Tractors
3 8.00
212
0.43 Building Construction
Forklifts
3 8.00
89 0.20
Building Construction
Generator Sets
1 8.00
84 0.74
Building Construction
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
0 8.00
97 0.37
Building Construction
Welders
1 8.00
46 0.45
Paving
Pavers
2 8.00
130
0.42 Paving
Paving Equipment
2 8.00
132
0.36 Paving
Rollers
2 8.00
80 0.38
Architectural Coating
Air Compressors
1 8.00
78 0.48
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 330,585; Non-Residential Outdoor: 110,195; Striped Parking Area:
12,867 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 100
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 200
Acres of Paving: 4.92
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.1434
0.0000
0.1434
0.0554
0.0000
0.0554
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0224
0.2521
0.1000
2.8000e-
004
0.0108
0.0108
9.9300e-
003
9.9300e-
003
0.0000
25.0258
25.0258
8.0900e-
003
0.0000
25.2281
Total
0.0224
0.2521
0.1000
2.8000e-
004
0.1434
0.0108
0.1542
0.0554
9.9300e-
003
0.0653
0.0000
25.0258
25.0258
8.0900e-
003
0.0000
25.2281
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7 18.00
3.00 0.00
14.70 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Grading
6 15.00
5.00 0.00
14.70 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Building Construction
9 183.00
63.00 0.00
14.70 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Paving
6 15.00
0.00 0.00
14.70 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Architectural Coating
1 37.00
0.00 0.00
14.70 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
2.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
2.2000e-
004
0.0000
9.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.2627
0.2627
0.0000
4.0000e-
005
0.2744
Worker
3.1000e-
004
2.4000e-
004
3.0700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.9000e-
004
2.6000e-
004
0.0000
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
0.7822
0.7822
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.7892
Total
3.3000e-
004
9.1000e-
004
3.2900e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0800e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.0900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.0449
1.0449
2.0000e-
005
6.0000e-
005
1.0635
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.0559
0.0000
0.0559
0.0216
0.0000
0.0216
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0224
0.2521
0.1000
2.8000e-
004
0.0108
0.0108
9.9300e-
003
9.9300e-
003
0.0000
25.0257
25.0257
8.0900e-
003
0.0000
25.2281
Total
0.0224
0.2521
0.1000
2.8000e-
004
0.0559
0.0108
0.0667
0.0216
9.9300e-
003
0.0315
0.0000
25.0257
25.0257
8.0900e-
003
0.0000
25.2281
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
2.0000e-
005
6.7000e-
004
2.2000e-
004
0.0000
9.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.2627
0.2627
0.0000
4.0000e-
005
0.2744
Worker
3.1000e-
004
2.4000e-
004
3.0700e-
003
1.0000e-
005
9.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
9.9000e-
004
2.6000e-
004
0.0000
2.7000e-
004
0.0000
0.7822
0.7822
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.7892
Total
3.3000e-
004
9.1000e-
004
3.2900e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.0800e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.0900e-
003
2.9000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.1000e-
004
0.0000
1.0449
1.0449
2.0000e-
005
6.0000e-
005
1.0635
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.1663
0.0000
0.1663
0.0446
0.0000
0.0446
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0293
0.3385
0.1550
4.4000e-
004
0.0135
0.0135
0.0124
0.0124
0.0000
38.5139
38.5139
0.0125
0.0000
38.8253
Total
0.0293
0.3385
0.1550
4.4000e-
004
0.1663
0.0135
0.1798
0.0446
0.0124
0.0570
0.0000
38.5139
38.5139
0.0125
0.0000
38.8253
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
8.0000e-
005
2.2200e-
003
7.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.2000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
3.5000e-
004
9.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
004
0.0000
0.8756
0.8756
1.0000e-
005
1.3000e-
004
0.9145
Worker
5.2000e-
004
4.1000e-
004
5.1100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6600e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000
1.3037
1.3037
3.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
1.3153
Total
6.0000e-
004
2.6300e-
003
5.8600e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9700e-
003
4.0000e-
005
2.0100e-
003
5.3000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
5.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.1793
2.1793
4.0000e-
005
1.7000e-
004
2.2298
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust
0.0649
0.0000
0.0649
0.0174
0.0000
0.0174
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
0.0293
0.3385
0.1550
4.4000e-
004
0.0135
0.0135
0.0124
0.0124
0.0000
38.5138
38.5138
0.0125
0.0000
38.8252
Total
0.0293
0.3385
0.1550
4.4000e-
004
0.0649
0.0135
0.0784
0.0174
0.0124
0.0298
0.0000
38.5138
38.5138
0.0125
0.0000
38.8252
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
8.0000e-
005
2.2200e-
003
7.5000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
3.2000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
3.5000e-
004
9.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
1.2000e-
004
0.0000
0.8756
0.8756
1.0000e-
005
1.3000e-
004
0.9145
Worker
5.2000e-
004
4.1000e-
004
5.1100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6600e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000
1.3037
1.3037
3.0000e-
005
4.0000e-
005
1.3153
Total
6.0000e-
004
2.6300e-
003
5.8600e-
003
2.0000e-
005
1.9700e-
003
4.0000e-
005
2.0100e-
003
5.3000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
5.7000e-
004
0.0000
2.1793
2.1793
4.0000e-
005
1.7000e-
004
2.2298
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1119
1.1906
0.7068
1.7200e-
003
0.0510
0.0510
0.0476
0.0476
0.0000
149.1605
149.1605
0.0405
0.0000
150.1722
Total
0.1119
1.1906
0.7068
1.7200e-
003
0.0510
0.0510
0.0476
0.0476
0.0000
149.1605
149.1605
0.0405
0.0000
150.1722
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
4.0000e-
003
0.1119
0.0377
4.6000e-
004
0.0159
1.5400e-
003
0.0175
4.5900e-
003
1.4700e-
003
6.0600e-
003
0.0000
44.1296
44.1296
4.6000e-
004
6.5500e-
003
46.0926
Worker
0.0256
0.0199
0.2494
6.9000e-
004
0.0805
4.1000e-
004
0.0809
0.0214
3.8000e-
004
0.0217
0.0000
63.6194
63.6194
1.7000e-
003
1.7600e-
003
64.1867
Total
0.0296
0.1318
0.2870
1.1500e-
003
0.0964
1.9500e-
003
0.0983
0.0260
1.8500e-
003
0.0278
0.0000
107.7490
107.7490
2.1600e-
003
8.3100e-
003
110.2793
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1119
1.1906
0.7068
1.7200e-
003
0.0510
0.0510
0.0476
0.0476
0.0000
149.1603
149.1603
0.0405
0.0000
150.1720
Total
0.1119
1.1906
0.7068
1.7200e-
003
0.0510
0.0510
0.0476
0.0476
0.0000
149.1603
149.1603
0.0405
0.0000
150.1720
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
4.0000e-
003
0.1119
0.0377
4.6000e-
004
0.0159
1.5400e-
003
0.0175
4.5900e-
003
1.4700e-
003
6.0600e-
003
0.0000
44.1296
44.1296
4.6000e-
004
6.5500e-
003
46.0926
Worker
0.0256
0.0199
0.2494
6.9000e-
004
0.0805
4.1000e-
004
0.0809
0.0214
3.8000e-
004
0.0217
0.0000
63.6194
63.6194
1.7000e-
003
1.7600e-
003
64.1867
Total
0.0296
0.1318
0.2870
1.1500e-
003
0.0964
1.9500e-
003
0.0983
0.0260
1.8500e-
003
0.0278
0.0000
107.7490
107.7490
2.1600e-
003
8.3100e-
003
110.2793
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1914
1.9653
1.3010
3.2200e-
003
0.0838
0.0838
0.0782
0.0782
0.0000
279.5199
279.5199
0.0755
0.0000
281.4082
Total
0.1914
1.9653
1.3010
3.2200e-
003
0.0838
0.0838
0.0782
0.0782
0.0000
279.5199
279.5199
0.0755
0.0000
281.4082
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
5.1200e-
003
0.1620
0.0645
8.3000e-
004
0.0299
1.3500e-
003
0.0312
8.6100e-
003
1.2900e-
003
9.9000e-
003
0.0000
79.4984
79.4984
8.0000e-
004
0.0118
83.0215
Worker
0.0446
0.0330
0.4309
1.2500e-
003
0.1509
7.2000e-
004
0.1516
0.0401
6.6000e-
004
0.0407
0.0000
116.1590
116.1590
2.8600e-
003
3.0500e-
003
117.1384
Total
0.0497
0.1950
0.4954
2.0800e-
003
0.1807
2.0700e-
003
0.1828
0.0487
1.9500e-
003
0.0506
0.0000
195.6574
195.6574
3.6600e-
003
0.0148
200.1598
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.1914
1.9653
1.3010
3.2200e-
003
0.0838
0.0838
0.0782
0.0782
0.0000
279.5196
279.5196
0.0755
0.0000
281.4079
Total
0.1914
1.9653
1.3010
3.2200e-
003
0.0838
0.0838
0.0782
0.0782
0.0000
279.5196
279.5196
0.0755
0.0000
281.4079
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
5.1200e-
003
0.1620
0.0645
8.3000e-
004
0.0299
1.3500e-
003
0.0312
8.6100e-
003
1.2900e-
003
9.9000e-
003
0.0000
79.4984
79.4984
8.0000e-
004
0.0118
83.0215
Worker
0.0446
0.0330
0.4309
1.2500e-
003
0.1509
7.2000e-
004
0.1516
0.0401
6.6000e-
004
0.0407
0.0000
116.1590
116.1590
2.8600e-
003
3.0500e-
003
117.1384
Total
0.0497
0.1950
0.4954
2.0800e-
003
0.1807
2.0700e-
003
0.1828
0.0487
1.9500e-
003
0.0506
0.0000
195.6574
195.6574
3.6600e-
003
0.0148
200.1598
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
0.9236
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
5.1100e-
003
0.0348
0.0483
8.0000e-
005
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
0.0000
6.8087
6.8087
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
6.8189
Total
0.9288
0.0348
0.0483
8.0000e-
005
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
0.0000
6.8087
6.8087
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
6.8189
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.4000e-
003
1.7800e-
003
0.0232
7.0000e-
005
8.1300e-
003
4.0000e-
005
8.1700e-
003
2.1600e-
003
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
003
0.0000
6.2629
6.2629
1.5000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
6.3157
Total
2.4000e-
003
1.7800e-
003
0.0232
7.0000e-
005
8.1300e-
003
4.0000e-
005
8.1700e-
003
2.1600e-
003
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
003
0.0000
6.2629
6.2629
1.5000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
6.3157
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating
0.9236
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Off-Road
5.1100e-
003
0.0348
0.0483
8.0000e-
005
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
0.0000
6.8087
6.8087
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
6.8189
Total
0.9288
0.0348
0.0483
8.0000e-
005
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
1.8900e-
003
0.0000
6.8087
6.8087
4.1000e-
004
0.0000
6.8189
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
2.4000e-
003
1.7800e-
003
0.0232
7.0000e-
005
8.1300e-
003
4.0000e-
005
8.1700e-
003
2.1600e-
003
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
003
0.0000
6.2629
6.2629
1.5000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
6.3157
Total
2.4000e-
003
1.7800e-
003
0.0232
7.0000e-
005
8.1300e-
003
4.0000e-
005
8.1700e-
003
2.1600e-
003
4.0000e-
005
2.2000e-
003
0.0000
6.2629
6.2629
1.5000e-
004
1.6000e-
004
6.3157
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0103
0.1019
0.1458
2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000
20.0269
20.0269
6.4800e-
003
0.0000
20.1888
Paving
6.4500e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0168
0.1019
0.1458
2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000
20.0269
20.0269
6.4800e-
003
0.0000
20.1888
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.9000e-
004
3.6000e-
004
4.7100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6600e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000
1.2695
1.2695
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
1.2802
Total
4.9000e-
004
3.6000e-
004
4.7100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6600e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000
1.2695
1.2695
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
1.2802
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0103
0.1019
0.1458
2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000
20.0268
20.0268
6.4800e-
003
0.0000
20.1888
Paving
6.4500e-
003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0168
0.1019
0.1458
2.3000e-
004
5.1000e-
003
5.1000e-
003
4.6900e-
003
4.6900e-
003
0.0000
20.0268
20.0268
6.4800e-
003
0.0000
20.1888
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
4.9000e-
004
3.6000e-
004
4.7100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6600e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000
1.2695
1.2695
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
1.2802
Total
4.9000e-
004
3.6000e-
004
4.7100e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6500e-
003
1.0000e-
005
1.6600e-
003
4.4000e-
004
1.0000e-
005
4.5000e-
004
0.0000
1.2695
1.2695
3.0000e-
005
3.0000e-
005
1.2802
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Manufacturing
0.00 0.00
0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces
0.00 0.00
0.00 Parking Lot
0.00 0.00
0.00 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
0.00 0.00
0.00 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
0.00 0.00
0.00 Total
0.00 0.00
0.00 Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Manufacturing
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 Other Asphalt Surfaces
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 Parking Lot
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 Refrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Manufacturing
0.534849
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057
0.001100
0.005468
Other Asphalt Surfaces
0.534849
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057
0.001100
0.005468
Parking Lot
0.534849
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057
0.001100
0.005468
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
0.534849
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057
0.001100
0.005468
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.534849
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057
0.001100
0.005468
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
NaturalGas
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Unmitigated
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.1051
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.8102
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
6.2000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Total
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.1051
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.8102
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
6.2000e-
004
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Total
0.9160
6.0000e-
005
6.7300e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0131
0.0131
3.0000e-
005
0.0000
0.0140
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Category/Year
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Manufacturing
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 1:52 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Construction - Unmitigated) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
APPENDIX 3.2:
CALEEMOD MANUFACTURING CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) Riverside-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Total Project area (without Warehouse and High-Cube Cold Storage use) is 5.68 acres Construction Phase - Operations run only
Off-road Equipment - Operations run only
Vehicle Trips - Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis Fleet Mix - Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis
Operational Off-Road Equipment - Based on SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary of Busniess Survey Results (2014)
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Manufacturing
33.06 1000sqft
0.76 33,060.00
0 User Defined Industrial
33.06 User Defined Unit
0.00 0.00
0 Parking Lot
134.00
Space
0.94 41,076.00
0 Other Asphalt Surfaces
173.37
1000sqft
3.98 173,366.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.4 28
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2023
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98
0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00 0.00
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
8/26/2022
7/31/2022
tblFleetMix
HHD
0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix
HHD
0.02 0.63
tblFleetMix
LDA
0.53 0.58
tblFleetMix
LDA
0.53 0.00
tblFleetMix
LDT1
0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix
LDT1
0.06 0.00
tblFleetMix
LDT2
0.17 0.19
tblFleetMix
LDT2
0.17 0.00
tblFleetMix
LHD1
0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix
LHD1
0.03 0.10
tblFleetMix
LHD2
7.3100e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
LHD2
7.3100e-003
0.03 tblFleetMix
MCY
0.02 0.03
tblFleetMix
MCY
0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix
MDV
0.14 0.15
tblFleetMix
MDV
0.14 0.00
tblFleetMix
MH
5.4680e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
MH
5.4680e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
MHD
0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix
MHD
0.01 0.25
tblFleetMix
OBUS
6.1600e-004
0.00 tblFleetMix
OBUS
6.1600e-004
0.00 tblFleetMix
SBUS
1.1000e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
SBUS
1.1000e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
UBUS
3.1500e-004
0.00 tblFleetMix
UBUS
3.1500e-004
0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblLandUse
LandUseSquareFeet
53,600.00
41,076.00
tblLandUse
LotAcreage
1.21 0.94
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00 0.00
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment
OperDaysPerYear
260.00
365.00
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment
OperFuelType
Diesel
CNG
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment
OperHorsePower
97.00 200.00
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment
OperHoursPerDay
8.00 4.00
tblOperationalOffRoadEquipment
OperOffRoadEquipmentNumber
0.00 1.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60 40.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TTP
0.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips
PR_TP
0.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
6.42 1.34
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
0.00 0.15
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
5.09 0.89
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
0.00 0.10
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
3.93 4.30
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
0.00 0.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Maximum
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Maximum
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Highest
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
0.1521
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
Energy
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
117.7479
117.7479
6.2200e-
003
1.6700e-
003
118.4000
Mobile
0.0734
0.4073
0.8408
3.7000e-
003
0.2660
5.0100e-
003
0.2710
0.0719
4.7700e-
003
0.0767
0.0000
351.2712
351.2712
0.0101
0.0347
361.8663
Offroad
0.0201
0.1891
0.1367
5.8000e-
004
6.8600e-
003
6.8600e-
003
6.3100e-
003
6.3100e-
003
0.0000
50.7519
50.7519
0.0164
0.0000
51.1623
Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
8.3206
0.0000
8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.4255
17.6543
20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
Total
0.2514
0.6488
1.0263
4.5900e-
003
0.2660
0.0159
0.2819
0.0719
0.0151
0.0870
10.7461
537.4345
548.1806
0.7751
0.0424
580.2039
Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
0.1521
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
Energy
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
117.7479
117.7479
6.2200e-
003
1.6700e-
003
118.4000
Mobile
0.0734
0.4073
0.8408
3.7000e-
003
0.2660
5.0100e-
003
0.2710
0.0719
4.7700e-
003
0.0767
0.0000
351.2712
351.2712
0.0101
0.0347
361.8663
Offroad
0.0201
0.1891
0.1367
5.8000e-
004
6.8600e-
003
6.8600e-
003
6.3100e-
003
6.3100e-
003
0.0000
50.7519
50.7519
0.0164
0.0000
51.1623
Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
8.3206
0.0000
8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
2.4255
17.6543
20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
Total
0.2514
0.6488
1.0263
4.5900e-
003
0.2660
0.0159
0.2819
0.0719
0.0151
0.0870
10.7461
537.4345
548.1806
0.7751
0.0424
580.2039
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
8/1/2022
7/31/2022
5 0
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
0 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
0 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
0 8.00
247
0.40 Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
0 0.00
0.00 0.00
14.70 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 4.92
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.0734
0.4073
0.8408
3.7000e-
003
0.2660
5.0100e-
003
0.2710
0.0719
4.7700e-
003
0.0767
0.0000
351.2712
351.2712
0.0101
0.0347
361.8663
Unmitigated
0.0734
0.4073
0.8408
3.7000e-
003
0.2660
5.0100e-
003
0.2710
0.0719
4.7700e-
003
0.0767
0.0000
351.2712
351.2712
0.0101
0.0347
361.8663
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Manufacturing
142.00
44.27 29.41
495,765
495,765
Other Asphalt Surfaces
0.00 0.00
0.00 Parking Lot
0.00 0.00
0.00 User Defined Industrial
16.00 4.99
3.32 183,685
183,685
Total
158.00
49.26 32.73
679,450
679,450
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Manufacturing
16.60 8.40
6.90 59.00
28.00 13.00
92 5
3 Other Asphalt Surfaces
16.60 8.40
6.90 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 Parking Lot
16.60 8.40
6.90 0.00
0.00 0.00
0 0
0 User Defined Industrial
40.00 8.40
6.90 100.00
0.00 0.00
100
0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Manufacturing
0.576000
0.060300
0.185900
0.151900
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.025900
0.000000
0.000000
Other Asphalt Surfaces
0.534849
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057
0.001100
0.005468
Parking Lot
0.534849
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057
0.001100
0.005468
User Defined Industrial
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.098100
0.026900
0.250000
0.625000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
60.7110
60.7110
5.1200e-
003
6.2000e-
004
61.0242
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
60.7110
60.7110
5.1200e-
003
6.2000e-
004
61.0242
NaturalGas
Mitigated
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
57.0368
57.0368
1.0900e-
003
1.0500e-
003
57.3758
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
57.0368
57.0368
1.0900e-
003
1.0500e-
003
57.3758
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
1.06883e
+006
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
57.0368
57.0368
1.0900e-
003
1.0500e-
003
57.3758
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
57.0368
57.0368
1.0900e-
003
1.0500e-
003
57.3758
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
1.06883e
+006
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
57.0368
57.0368
1.0900e-
003
1.0500e-
003
57.3758
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
5.7600e-
003
0.0524
0.0440
3.1000e-
004
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
3.9800e-
003
0.0000
57.0368
57.0368
1.0900e-
003
1.0500e-
003
57.3758
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
327955
58.1614
4.9100e-
003
6.0000e-
004
58.4614
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
14376.6
2.5496
2.2000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
2.5628
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
60.7110
5.1300e-
003
6.3000e-
004
61.0242
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
6.0 Area Detail
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Manufacturing
327955
58.1614
4.9100e-
003
6.0000e-
004
58.4614
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
14376.6
2.5496
2.2000e-
004
3.0000e-
005
2.5628
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
60.7110
5.1300e-
003
6.3000e-
004
61.0242
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.1521
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
Unmitigated
0.1521
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0183
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.1333
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
4.4000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
Total
0.1521
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
7.0 Water Detail
6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
SubCategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural
Coating
0.0183
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Consumer
Products
0.1333
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Landscaping
4.4000e-
004
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
Total
0.1521
4.0000e-
005
4.7700e-
003
0.0000
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.2700e-
003
9.2700e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
9.8800e-
003
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated
20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
Unmitigated
20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Manufacturing
7.64513 /
0 20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Manufacturing
7.64513 /
0 20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
User Defined
Industrial
0 / 0
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
20.0797
0.2506
6.0600e-
003
28.1516
Mitigated
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated
8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Unmitigated
8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Category/Year
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Manufacturing
40.99 8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Manufacturing
40.99 8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Parking Lot
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
User Defined
Industrial
0 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
8.3206
0.4917
0.0000
20.6139
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Days/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 4.00
365
200
0.37 CNG
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Equipment Type
tons/yr
MT/yr
Tractors/Loaders/
Backhoes
0.0201
0.1891
0.1367
5.8000e-
004
6.8600e-
003
6.8600e-
003
6.3100e-
003
6.3100e-
003
0.0000
50.7519
50.7519
0.0164
0.0000
51.1623
Total
0.0201
0.1891
0.1367
5.8000e-
004
6.8600e-
003
6.8600e-
003
6.3100e-
003
6.3100e-
003
0.0000
50.7519
50.7519
0.0164
0.0000
51.1623
UnMitigated/Mitigated
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type
Number
Hours/Day
Hours/Year
Horse Power
Load Factor
Fuel Type
Boilers
Equipment Type
Number
Heat Input/Day
Heat Input/Year
Boiler Rating
Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type
Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:46 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Manufacturing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
This page intentionally left blank
Moreno Valley Business Park – Phase II Greenhouse Gas Analysis 14397-05 GHG Report
APPENDIX 3.3:
CALEEMOD WAREHOUSING OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) Riverside-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - Operations run only
Off-road Equipment - Operations run only
Vehicle Trips - Trip characteristics based on information provided in the Traffic analysis Fleet Mix - Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY). Truck Mix based on information in the Traffic analysis
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
154.27
1000sqft
3.54 154,270.00
0 User Defined Industrial
154.27
User Defined Unit
0.00 0.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s)
Precipitation Freq (Days)
2.4 28
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company
Southern California Edison
2023
Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98
0.033
CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
0.004
N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
20.00 0.00
tblConstructionPhase
PhaseEndDate
8/26/2022
7/31/2022
tblFleetMix
HHD
0.02 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblFleetMix
HHD
0.02 0.62
tblFleetMix
LDA
0.53 0.58
tblFleetMix
LDA
0.53 0.00
tblFleetMix
LDT1
0.06 0.06
tblFleetMix
LDT1
0.06 0.00
tblFleetMix
LDT2
0.17 0.19
tblFleetMix
LDT2
0.17 0.00
tblFleetMix
LHD1
0.03 0.00
tblFleetMix
LHD1
0.03 0.13
tblFleetMix
LHD2
7.3100e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
LHD2
7.3100e-003
0.04 tblFleetMix
MCY
0.02 0.03
tblFleetMix
MCY
0.02 0.00
tblFleetMix
MDV
0.14 0.15
tblFleetMix
MDV
0.14 0.00
tblFleetMix
MH
5.4680e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
MH
5.4680e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
MHD
0.01 0.00
tblFleetMix
MHD
0.01 0.21
tblFleetMix
OBUS
6.1600e-004
0.00 tblFleetMix
OBUS
6.1600e-004
0.00 tblFleetMix
SBUS
1.1000e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
SBUS
1.1000e-003
0.00 tblFleetMix
UBUS
3.1500e-004
0.00 tblFleetMix
UBUS
3.1500e-004
0.00 tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
1.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
3.00 0.00
tblOffRoadEquipment
OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount
2.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TL
16.60 40.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips
CW_TTP
0.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips
PR_TP
0.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
1.74 0.10
tblVehicleTrips
ST_TR
0.00 0.05
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
1.74 0.04
tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
0.00 0.02
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
1.74 1.11
tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
0.00 0.61
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Maximum
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Maximum
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Highest
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
0.6293
4.0000e-
005
3.9400e-
003
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
7.6600e-
003
7.6600e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
8.1600e-
003
Energy
1.6700e-
003
0.0152
0.0128
9.0000e-
005
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
0.0000
80.0203
80.0203
5.6700e-
003
9.5000e-
004
80.4461
Mobile
0.1114
1.9983
1.2757
0.0132
0.6417
0.0236
0.6652
0.1775
0.0225
0.2000
0.0000
1,261.940
1 1,261.940
1 0.0208
0.1652
1,311.690
7 Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
29.4357
0.0000
29.4357
1.7396
0.0000
72.9258
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
11.3180
82.3812
93.6992
1.1694
0.0283
131.3655
Total
0.7424
2.0135
1.2924
0.0133
0.6417
0.0247
0.6664
0.1775
0.0237
0.2012
40.7537
1,424.349
2 1,465.103
0 2.9355
0.1944
1,596.436
1 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area
0.6293
4.0000e-
005
3.9400e-
003
0.0000
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
1.0000e-
005
0.0000
7.6600e-
003
7.6600e-
003
2.0000e-
005
0.0000
8.1600e-
003
Energy
1.6700e-
003
0.0152
0.0128
9.0000e-
005
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
0.0000
80.0203
80.0203
5.6700e-
003
9.5000e-
004
80.4461
Mobile
0.1114
1.9983
1.2757
0.0132
0.6417
0.0236
0.6652
0.1775
0.0225
0.2000
0.0000
1,261.940
1 1,261.940
1 0.0208
0.1652
1,311.690
7 Waste
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
29.4357
0.0000
29.4357
1.7396
0.0000
72.9258
Water
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
11.3180
82.3812
93.6992
1.1694
0.0283
131.3655
Total
0.7424
2.0135
1.2924
0.0133
0.6417
0.0247
0.6664
0.1775
0.0237
0.2012
40.7537
1,424.349
2 1,465.103
0 2.9355
0.1944
1,596.436
1 Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 Demolition
Demolition
8/1/2022
7/31/2022
5 0
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio-CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Percent
Reduction
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition
Concrete/Industrial Saws
0 8.00
81 0.73
Demolition
Excavators
0 8.00
158
0.38 Demolition
Rubber Tired Dozers
0 8.00
247
0.40 Trips and VMT
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition
0 0.00
0.00 0.00
14.70 6.90
20.00 LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
HHDT
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating
–
sqft)
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off-Road
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Vendor
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Worker
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Total
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
0.1114
1.9983
1.2757
0.0132
0.6417
0.0236
0.6652
0.1775
0.0225
0.2000
0.0000
1,261.940
1 1,261.940
1 0.0208
0.1652
1,311.690
7 Unmitigated
0.1114
1.9983
1.2757
0.0132
0.6417
0.0236
0.6652
0.1775
0.0225
0.2000
0.0000
1,261.940
1 1,261.940
1 0.0208
0.1652
1,311.690
7 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail
172.00
14.96 5.99
539,344
539,344
User Defined Industrial
94.00 8.18
3.27 1,001,375
1,001,375
Total
265.99
23.14 9.26
1,540,719
1,540,719
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass-by
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
16.60 8.40
6.90 59.00
0.00 41.00
92 5
3 User Defined Industrial
40.00 8.40
6.90 100.00
0.00 0.00
100
0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
0.576000
0.060300
0.185900
0.151900
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.025900
0.000000
0.000000
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM
Moreno Valley Business Park - Phase II (Warehousing Operations) - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
User Defined Industrial
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.133500
0.036700
0.212800
0.617000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
0.000000
5.0 Energy Detail
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N2O
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
63.4731
63.4731
5.3600e-
003
6.5000e-
004
63.8006
Electricity
Unmitigated
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
63.4731
63.4731
5.3600e-
003
6.5000e-
004
63.8006
NaturalGas
Mitigated
1.6700e-
003
0.0152
0.0128
9.0000e-
005
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
0.0000
16.5472
16.5472
3.2000e-
004
3.0000e-
004
16.6455
NaturalGas
Unmitigated
1.6700e-
003
0.0152
0.0128
9.0000e-
005
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
1.1600e-
003
0.0000
16.5472
16.5472
3.2000e-
004
3.0000e-
004
16.6455
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0
Date: 12/14/2021 12:54 PM