PC Public Comments.pdf — Moreno Valley City Council, February 17, 2026

From: Casas, Yesenia
To: Planning Notices_DG
Cc: Vega, Jaqueline
Subject: Project: (PEN24-0023), (PEN24-0024), (PEN24-022), & (PEN24-0021) - REVIEW Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 11:06:37 AM
Attachments: Safe Attachments Scan In Progress.msg
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good morning Grace,
Thank you for transmitting the above referenced project to ALUC for review. Please note that the proposed project is located outside the airport influenced area and therefore review by the ALUC is not required.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact ALUC Planner, Jackie Vega.

Best regards,
Yesenia Casas
Executive Assistant I

Confidentiality Disclaimer
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.

If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and printed, and contact the author immediately.

County of Riverside California
November ϲ, 2025
Grace Espino-Salcedo, Associate Planner
14177 Frederick Street
Post Office Box 88005
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
Subject: Bradshaw Collection Project – Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration Dear Ms. Espino-Salcedo:

EMWD appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the Notice of Intent (NOI) for the Moreno Valley Bradshaw Collection Project Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ;/^DEͿ. The subject project may require either water, sewer and/or recycled water services from EMWD. The details of said service connection points will be further detailed in a separate document, known as EMWD’s Design Conditions (DC), to be developed by the project proponent and approved by EMWD.

The DC evaluation will identify the potential requirement to construct new facilities, such as on-site and offsite water, sewer and recycled water pipelines, sewer lift station, water booster station, water storage tank, facilities relocation related to conflicts with proposed improvements, (such as relocating existing facilities, street realignments, street vacations, proposed medians and additional soil import), as well as associated easements and/or Right-of-Way Permits to adequately serve the project demands.

The subject project was reviewed for Due Diligenc e with EMWD’s Development Services Department, with a Project Number PPI 2024-1575. Furthermore, the ISMND identifies the installation of a new 8- inch water pipeline in Bradshaw Circle that would connect to an existing 12- inch water pipeline in Cactus Avenue and convey water supplies to the pr oposed residences and landscaping through plumbing/landscaping fixtures. Additionally, the ISMND identifies the installation of onsite sewer lines within the proposed onsite streets that would connect to the existing sewer line in Cactus Avenue and eventually transport wastewater flows to the Moreno Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility.

To date, EMWD received a Work Order deposit to develop the DC, to identify on-site and offsite facilities required to serve this project. The issued Work Order number for this project is WO #16791͘ Ms. Espino-Salcedo
EŽǀember ϲ, 2025

Page 2 ends

If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact Maroun El-Hage at (951) 928-3777, extension 4468 or by email at [email protected].

Sincerely,
Anthony Budicin
Director of Environmental and Regulatory Compliance
Cc: Maroun El-Hage, MPA, MS, PE, EMWD Prin cipal Civil Engineer, Dev. Services Dept.

Jose Ruiz, EMWD Assistant Engineer, Dev. Services Dept.

Martha Vilchis, EMWD Water Resources Specialist Assistant, ERC Dept.

Attachment: Copy of Public Notice
Anthony
Budicin
Digitally signed by
Anthony Budicin
Date: 2025.11.06 15:38:43
-08'00'

Amy McNeill, PE | Engineering Project Manager
Development Review
Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street | Riverside, CA 92501
Direct
: 951-955-1214 | Email: [email protected]
From: McNeill, Amy
To: Planning Notices_DG
Cc: Cornelius, William; McKinney, Elsa
Subject: TTM 37858 (PEN24-0021), CUP for PUD (PEN24-0022), GPA (PEN24-0023), CZ (PEN24-0024) Date: Friday, November 14, 2025 8:48:40 AM
Attachments: image001.png
265890.pdf
258604_{CA1A8252-0393-CFA3-85C6-920C98900000}.pdf
4584_001.pdf
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good morning, Grace,
Attached is a copy of Riverside County Flood Control’s comments pertaining to the above- mentioned project and the mentioned previous letter.

Should you have any questions please feel free to contact us.

Amy

County of Riverside California

JASON E. UHLEY 1995 MARKET STREET
General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
www.rcflood.org

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

258604

September 19, 2024

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development Department Planning Division
Post Office Box 88005
Moreno Valley, CA 92552-0805

Attention: Grace Espino-Salcedo Re: TTM 37858 (PEN24-0021), CUP for Planned Unit Development (PEN24-0022),
GPA (PEN24-0023), CZ (PEN24-0024),
APNs 478-090-018, 478-090-024, 478-090-025

The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases.

District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical com ponent or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.

The District's review is based on the above -referenced project transmittal, received September 13, 2024 . The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue:

☐ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed.

☐ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. All reg ulatory permits (and all documents pertaining thereto, e.g., Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Conservation Plans/Easements) that are to be secured by the Applicant for both facility construction and maintenance shall be submitted to the District for review.

The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.

☐ If this project proposes channels, storm drains larger than 36 inches in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension a District's facility, the District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits.

City of Moreno Valley - 2 - September 19, 2024
Re: TTM 37858 (PEN24-0021), CUP for Planned
Unit Development (PEN24-0022), 258604
GPA (PEN24-0023), CZ (PEN24-0024),
APNs 478-090-018, 478-090-024, 478-090-025

There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.

☒ This project is located within the limits of the District's Moreno Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit.

☐ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, ____________________. If a proposed storm drain connection exceeds the hydraulic performance of the existing draina ge facilities, mitigation will be required. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266.

☒ The District's previous comments dated March 3, 2022 for case PEN 20-0172 are still valid.

GENERAL INFORMATION
The project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document, and/or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and with all other federal, state, and local environmental rules and regulations that may apply, such as, but not limited to, the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act, California Fish and Game Code Section 1602 and the Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The District's action associated with the subject project triggers evaluation by the District with respect to the applicant's compliance with federal, state, and local environmental laws. For this project, the Lead Agency is the agency in the address above, and the District is a Responsible Agency under CEQA. The District, as a Co -permittee under the MSHCP, needs to demonstrate that all District related activities, including the actions identified above, are consistent with the MSHCP. This is typically achieved through determinations from the CEQA Lead Agency (if they are also a Co -permittee) for the project. For the MSHCP, the District 's focus will be part icular to Sections

6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.3.2, 7.3.7, 7.5.3 , and Appendix C of the MSHCP. Please include consistency determination statements from the Lead Agency/Co -permittee for the project for each of these sections in the CEQA document.

The District may also require that an applicant provide supporting technical documentation for environmental clearance.

This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.

If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.

Very truly yours,

AMY MCNEILL
Engineering Project Manager

Attachment

EM:blj

JASON E. UHLEY 1995 MARKET STREET
General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX
www.rcflood.org

265890

RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL

AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

November 13, 2025

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development Department Planning Division
Post Office Box 88005
Moreno Valley, CA 92552-0805

Attention: Grace Espino-Salcedo Re: TTM 37858 (PEN 24-0021), CUP (PEN 24-0022), GPA (PEN 24-0023),
CZ (PEN 24-0024), APNs 478-090-018,
478-090-024 and 478-090-025

The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases or provide St ate Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases.

District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.

The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received October 20, 2025. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue:

☐ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed.

☐ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and a ny other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. All regulatory permits (and all documents pertaining thereto, e.g., Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Conservation Plans/Easements) that are to be secured by the Applicant for both facil ity construction and maintenance shall be submitted to the District for review. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.

☐ If this project proposes channels, storm drains larger than 36 inches in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension a District's facility, the District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the terms and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the Distr ict and any other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. The regulatory permits' terms and conditions City of Moreno Valley - 2 - November 13, 2025
Re: TTM 37858 (PEN 24-0021), CUP
(PEN 24-0022), GPA (PEN 24-0023), 265890
CZ (PEN 24-0024), APNs 478-090-018,
478-090-024 and 478-090-025

shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.

☐ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, ____________________. If a proposed storm drain connection exceeds the hydraulic performance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266.

☒ The District's previous comments dated September 19, 2024 are still valid.

GENERAL INFORMATION
The project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document, and/or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and with all other federal, state, and local environmental rules and regulations that may apply, such as, but not limited to, the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Sections 404 and 401 of the Clean Water Act, California Fish and Game Code Section 1602, and the Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act. The District's action associated with the subject project triggers evaluation by the District with respect to the applicant's compliance with federal, state, and local environmental laws. For this project, the Lead Agency is the agency in the address above, and the District is a Responsible Agency under CEQA. The District, as a Co-permittee under the MSHCP, needs to demonstrate that all District related activities, including the actions identified above, are consistent with the MSHCP. This is typically achieved through determinations from the CEQA Lead Agency (if they are also a Co -permittee) for the project. For the MSHCP, the District's focus will be particular to Sections

6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.3.2, 7.3.7, 7.5.3, and Appendix C of the MSHCP. Please include consistency determination statements from the Lead Agency/Co-permittee for the project for each of these sections in the CEQA document.

The District may also require that an applicant provide supporting technica l documentation for environmental clearance.

If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.

Very truly yours,

AMY MCNEILL
Engineering Project Manager

EM:yt

From: SCG SE Region Redlands Utility Request
To: Planning Notices_DG
Cc: SCG SE Region Redlands Utility Request
Subject: 10/23/25- (PEN24-0023), (PEN24-0024), (PEN24-0022), (PEN24-0021), APN:478-090-018, 478-090-024 and 478-090-025
Date: Thursday, October 23, 2025 7:32:45 AM
Attachments: 20251022142033.pdf
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!

Hello,
Regarding: (PEN24-0023), (PEN24-0024), (PEN24-0022), (PEN24-0021), APN:478-090-018, 478-090-024 and 478-090-025
SoCalGas Distribution does not appear to have a conflict with this project, but does have facilities in the area. Please include a note to have the developer contact 811 / USA at DigAlert | Utility Locating California | Underground Wire & Cable Locator prior to any excavation / demolition activities so we can Locate & Mark out our facilities.

If the Developer needs new gas service, please have them contact our Builder Services group to begin the application process as soon as practicable, at https://www.socalgas.com/for- your-business/builder-services.

To avoid delays in processing requests and notifications, please have all Franchise correspondence sent to our Utility Request inbox,
at [email protected]

I cover the Southeast Region – Redlands
[email protected] would be your contact for requests in the southeastern ends of LA County, Riverside County, San Bernardino & Imperial Counties.

Southeast Region - Anaheim
office which is all of Orange County and the southern ends of Los Angeles County; therefore, any Map and/or Will Serve Letter requests you have in these areas please send them to AtlasRequests/[email protected]

Northwest Region – Compton HQ
For West and Central LA County, your Map Request and
Will Serve Letters, will go to [email protected]

Northwest Region - Chatsworth
For any requests from the northern most parts of LA County all the way up to Visalia, San Luis Obispo, Fresno and Tulare you would
contact [email protected]

Transmission
For Transmission requests, please contact SoCalGas Transmission, at [email protected]

MINOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS:
(CHIP SEAL, SLURRY SEAL, GRIND &

OVERLAY)
Please notify Southern California Gas Company 4 months prior to start of pavement
projects for the gas company to complete leak survey & repair leaks if found.

MAJOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: (PROJECTS REQUIRING EXCAVATIONS GREATER THAN 9 INCHES, WIDENING OF EXISTING STREETS, INSTALLING NEW

CURBS &
GUTTERS, BUS PADS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS, REALIGNMENT, GRADE SEPARATION, ETC.) &

PIPELINE PROJECTS
: (STORM DRAIN, WATERLINE, WATER, SEWER, ELECTRICAL,
TELECOMUNICATIONS, ETC.)
Please provide Southern California Gas Company with your signed designed plans
with gas company facilities posted
on your designs plans, 4-6 months prior to start
of construction for possible relocation of SCG medium pressure facilities and 9-12 months
for possible relocation of SCG high pressure facilities.

This time is needed to analyze plans and to design required alterations to any conflicting SCG gas facilities. Please keep us informed of any and all pre- construction meetings, construction schedules, etc., so that our work can be scheduled accordingly.

Potholing may be required to determine if a conflict exists between the proposed development and our facilities. If, for any reason, there are SCG facilities in conflict, and a request to be relocated is needed, it is important to send the request in writing. Please include all required information below:

A Signed “Notice to Owner” request on Official Letterhead from the City, County,
and/or company.

Name, Title and Project Number.

Address, Location, Start Date, Parameters & Scope of Entire Job/Project.

Copy of Thomas Guide Page and/or Google Map Screenshot Highlighting Project Area.

Requestor Company’s Contact Name, Title, Phone Number, Email, and other pertinent information.

Thank you,
Josh Rubal
Lead Planning Associate
Distribution Planning & Project Management
Redlands HQ - Southeast Region
(213) 231-7978 Office
[email protected]

From: william redden
To: Planning Notices_DG; Community Development - Planning Subject: agenda item I. 1
Date: Thursday, January 8, 2026 2:38:01 PM
Attachments: REASONSISSUES WHY WE ARE OPPOSED TO DEVELOPMENT TTM 37858.pdf PETITION 2025.pdf
opposition petition to 37 lots at bradshaw & cactus 12.29.22 insert pen.pdf development with other developments super imposed on aerial of the area.pdf Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
PLEASE SEND/DELIVER 4 attachments TO PLANNING COMMISSIONERS FOR HEARING TONIGHT regarding 1/8/2026 AGENDA ITEM I.1 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT (PEN24-0023),etc

REASONS/ISSUES WHY WE ARE OPPOSED TO THIS DEVELOPMENT (TTM 37858) AS IT IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED.

1.DENIAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR TTM 37858. Over 3 years ago the planning commission and city council denied the zone change, (General Plan amendment) for this development.

2.PAST PETITION OPPOSING THE DEVELOPMENT (PEN20-174 AND PEN20-175) (INCLUDE WITH THIS PACKET OF INFORMATION). In December 2022 and January 2023 over hundred Moreno Valley residents signed the petition opposing zone change from R-5 to R-10.

3.CURRENT PETITION OPPOSING DEVELOPMENT (PEN24-0023 AND PEN24-0024). (INCLUDED) The current petition has over 70 signatures.

4.VERY STRONG OPPOSITION TO ZONE CHANGE. Moreno Valley Residents’ opposition to zone change is very strong. Over 90% of folks we approached were against zone change and willing to sign the petition.

5.HOME OCCUPANCY IN 2021 FOR 28163 BRADSHAW CIRCLE ON 0.8 ACRE. We receive a certiﬁcate of occupancy for our home in November 2021.

6.R-5 ZONING FOR THE VACANT LAND CONTIGUOUS TO BRADSHAW for at least 15 years. When we bought the land in 2013, we researched the zoning for surrounding vacant. All parcels were zone R-5. As of this date all the parcels are still zoned R-5.

7.CHECK ZONING BEFORE BUYING HOMES OR BUILDING ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. I have heard planning commissioners express opinion that when people buy their home, they should verify zoning of land. Thus buyers should not be surprised when commercial development or high density housing is approved adjacent to their home.

The reverse should apply to developers. Developers should not be surprised by opposition to their development when requesting a zone change and subsequent denial of their development.

8.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. All construction activities will enter and exit onto Bradshaw circle.

9.TWO STREETS DEVELOPMENT CONNECTS ONTO BRADSHAW. The entire development empties onto Bradshaw via two streets. None of the streets connect to Cactus ave.

10.R 5 DESIGNATION DOES NOT EQUATE TO 5 DWELLINGS/ACRE AT TIME OF BUILD OUT. Some oﬃcials think that since it is zone R-5 (5 dwellings/acre) on 4.81 acres, this translates to 24 homes. However, as many of you on the planning commission know, due to constraints of the land, minimum lot width and depth, street improvements, and retention basins, the actual build out is more like 4 per acre or even less. For this property at 4 per acre that translates to 19 homes.

Examples: right on Bradshaw for the vacant lots, tentative tract map of 37580 with gross acreage of 1.972 ac, they could only build 6 homes due property constraints or 3/acre.

Another vacant parcel to the West of me has net land of 0.789 aces and can only build out 3 homes or 3.8/acre.

11. PRIVATE STEET CONVERSION TO PUBLIC STREET. Back in 2022/2023 the entire street was private. As of now about 1/2 street is private. Furthermore in 2025 some city oﬃcials received inquiries about building out their vacant land: the 0.78 ac parcel west of me and parcel across from me, tentative tract map 37580 of 6 homes. So we are anticipating that within 5 years much if not all Bradshaw circle will be a public street.

12.NO TRANSITION ZONE ALONG THE NORTHERN BORDER OF DEVELOPMENT. The city of Moreno Valley general plan strongly urges creation of a transition zone between developments when higher density housing development is adjacent to a lower density development.

13.HIGHER DENSITY DEVELOPMENT BUT NOT FOR LOW INCOME FOLKS. This 37 development does not meet California states requirement for higher density housing. The state is interested in building low income housing. These homes will sell between $400,000 to $600,000. 1/2 million dollar homes are not low income housing units.

Date: Monday, January 12, 2026 8:17:30 AM
Attachments: image001.png
4809_001.pdf
COAs.pdf
265890.pdf
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hello Grace,

I am late on this response but wanted to let you know condition 118 in the attached COAs addressed our previous comment letter regarding payment of the ADP fees. Therefore RCFC&WCD has no further comments. Hope Planning Commission went well.

Thank you!
Amy

County of Riverside California
From: Liao, William
To: Grace Espino-Salcedo
Cc: SCG SE Region Redlands Utility Request; Wildey, Paul L.

Subject: FW: PEN24-0023, PEN24-0024, PEN24-0022, and PEN24-0021 Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 1:56:49 PM
Attachments: 20260106131448.pdf
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Hi Grace.

This is Will Liao from SoCalGas. I’ve just reviewed the post card regarding PEN24-0023, PEN24-0024, PEN24-0022, and PEN24-0021. SoCalGas has existing facilities within the Cactus Ave right-of-way.

The parcels themselves appear to be clear. For everyone’s safety, however, please require developer to contact 811 prior to any excavation and/or demolition activities so we can get out to Locate & Mark out our facilities.

If the developer requires alteration to our existing facilities, or needs new gas service, please have them contact our Builder Services group as soon as practicable to begin the application process, at Builder Services | SoCalGas
.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Will Liao
Region Planning Supervisor
Redlands HQ / Southeast Region
Mobile: 840-213-5899

From: Liao, William <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 1:15 PM
To: Liao, William <[email protected]>
Subject:

From: George Hague
To: Planning Notices_DG
Cc: City Clerk; Angelica Frausto-Lupo
Subject: I.1 This Thursday GPA, Zone change, CUP and PUD Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2026 4:42:17 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good afternoon Planning Commissioner, Sent Wednesday January 7, 2026 @ 3:07pm
Besides needing a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) they also want a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
I hope you read about CuP’s I sent late last night and the power you have to make the project better.

Below is our city’s information on Planned Unit Developments (PUD) — Please Read — especially “H".
§ 9.03.060 Planned unit developments.

A. Purposes. The purposes of this section are to encourage:

1. Greater innovation in housing development and diversity of housing choices than would otherwise be possible according to the strict application of the site development regulations contained in this title;

2. Conservation or provision of more natural resources, more open space, more cultural resources, more on-site recreational facilities or more attractive freeway boundary conditions than would otherwise be possible according to the strict application of the site development regulations contained in this title;

3. Installation of stormwater pollution control systems pursuant to an applicable municipal stormwater permit issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board;

4. Well-designed mixed-use developments, where such developments are allowed by the zoning regulations; and

5. Development under the density bonus program for affordable housing pursuant to Section 9.03.050.

B. Applicability. This section is applicable to residential developments as well as mixed-use developments where a mix of residential and nonresidential uses is allowed by the zoning regulations. This section shall only apply where warranted to advance one or more of the purposes listed in subsection A. This section shall not apply where the proposed deviations from the established site development standards would be inconsistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan.

C. Review Process. Each planned unit development shall be subject to a conditional use (Ord. 604 § 2.5, 2002)
Hopefully you will require the developer to answer some of these conditions of approval — either at the meeting or perhaps if they call you before the meeting. Maybe ask if the roads will be private and the heights of the homes. Will the distance between garage doors and sidewalk all an SUV to be parked — will you then be able to open the garage door? Sincerely,
George Hague
permit. The appropriate land division application shall be filed concurrently if the land is to be divided.

D. Official Zoning Atlas. Each planned unit development shall be identified on the official zoning atlas as soon as practical after recordation of any associated final map, or as soon as practical after building final if there is no associated final map.

E. Minimum Project Area. The minimum area for a planned unit development shall be one acre.

F. Permitted Uses and Density. Only those uses permitted within the applicable zoning district shall be allowed within any planned unit development. The average density of any planned unit development shall not exceed the number of dwelling units per acre allowed under the applicable zoning district regulations.

G. Deviations from Site Development Standards. Planned unit developments may deviate from the site development standards set forth in the applicable zoning district regarding lot area, lot dimensions, lot coverage, setbacks and building height. Any such deviation(s) shall be to the minimum degree necessary to achieve one or more of the purposes listed in subsection A.

H. Conditions of Approval. The project conditions of approval shall establish the design of the planned unit development, including, but not limited to, the following:

1. The minimum lot area and lot dimensions. Flag lots are discouraged;

2. The maximum floor area covered by buildings;

3. The minimum front, side and rear setbacks. The setbacks around the exterior of the planned unit development shall be compatible with any adjacent residential developments;

4. The height, size, location and design of all proposed buildings, common areas, walls and other improvements; and

5. The method of maintaining all common areas and improvements.

From: George Hague
To: Planning Notices_DG
Cc: City Clerk; Angelica Frausto-Lupo
Subject: Item I.1 General Plan Amendment (GPA) & Conditional use Permit (CUP) Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2026 10:32:17 PM
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good morning Planning Commissioner, Sent late Tuesday January 6, 2026 Why do we have a General Plan when we keep being asked for General Plan Amendment's (GPA) and/or Zone changes.

The City has approved 18,000 units in the last couple of years which puts us way ahead of our Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) numbers.

The location of this site will mean the empty lots on both sides will very likely will also ask for a GPA and Zone Change to fit into the neighborhood you created.

R-5 ( 5 units/acre) is a good size for a family and much better the proposed 37 homes on less than 5 acres.

Every time you approve these up zones, I never see any increase width of our roads. When traffic becomes an even bigger nightmare in our city, you can thank yourselves.

Where will all the cars park — especially if they convert the garage into storage or a living space.

Is there enough length in the driveway to park an SUV and still open the garage door? Is there room between each driveways to park all the cars on the street? We do not need to keep increasing density which put a strain on all our services and impacts our infrastructure. — Again we have approved 18,000 units in the last couple of yeas.r

CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (CUP) GIVE THE PLANNING COMMISSION A LOT OF

POWER TO MAKE THE PROJECT MUCH BETTER AND EVEN REQUIRE IT TO COME BACK FOR A REVIEW BY YOU — NOT STAFF.— TO MAKE SURE CERTAIN THINGS WERE DONE. PLEASE READ THE BELOW FROM THE CITY:

CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (CUP) MORENO VALLEY
A.

1. 2.

3. 4.

Conditional use permits.

Purpose and Intent. A conditional use permit is intended to allow the establishment of those environment cannot be determined in advance of the use being proposed for a particular loca improvements, and potential impact on the surrounding area based on fixed and established sta Authority. Authority for approval of conditional use permits shall be vested with the planning com major development review procedures pursuant to Section 9.02.030(B) of this chapter and publi director may approve conditional use permits for uses identified with the "♦ " symbol in Table 9. and (2) the building or use is located more than 300 feet from a residential zone; and (3) the referred to the planning commission at the discretion of the community development director.

Required Findings. A
conditional use permit may be approved in whole or in part, if all of t The proposed project is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies and programs of the g The proposed project complies with all applicable zoning and other regulations; The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare or materi The location, design and operation of the proposed project will be compatible with existing a Conditions of Approval. In approving a conditional use permit, the approving authority shall impo the manner in which the site is used and any other conditions as may be deemed necessary t accordance with the purpose and intent of this title.

From: Casas, Yesenia
To: Planning Notices_DG
Cc: Vega, Jaqueline
Subject: Project: PEN24-0023, PEN24-0024, PEN24-0022, & PEN24-0021 Date: Monday, December 22, 2025 12:32:54 PM
Attachments: Outlook-14mspsih.png
SLAS14AD4M25122213250.pdf
Warning: External Email – Watch for Email Red Flags!
Good afternoon Grace,
Thank you for transmitting the above referenced project to ALUC for review. Please note that the proposed project is located outside the airport influence area and therefore review by the ALUC is not required.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact ALUC Planner, Jackie Vega.

Best regards,
Yesenia Casas
Executive Assistant I

County of Riverside California

Moreno Valley City CouncilFebruary 17, 2026

Moreno Valley City Council
February 17, 2026