1 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
FOR MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS
PROJECT NO. 803 0072
This Agreement is by and between the City of Moreno Valley, California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter described as "City," and Steinberg Hart, a California corporation, hereinafter described as "Consultant." This Agreement is made and entered into as of this _______ day of ______________ 2026
(“Effective Date”).
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City has determined it is in the public interest to proceed with the professional work hereinafter described as "Project"; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined the Project involves the performance of professional and technical services of a temporary nature as more specifically described in Exhibit "A" (City's Request for Proposal) and Exhibit "B" (Consultant's Proposal) hereto; and WHEREAS, the City does not have available employees to perform the services for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City has requested the Consultant to perform such services for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Consultant is professionally qualified in California to perform the professional and technical services required for the Project, and hereby represents that it desires to and is professionally and legally capable of performing the services called for by this Agreement; THEREFORE, the City and the Consultant, for the consideration hereinafter described, mutually agree as follows:
DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
2 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
1. The Project is described as the Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus, Project No. 803 0072.
SCOPE OF
SERVICES
2. The Consultant's scope of service is described on Exhibit " A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict, the City's Request for Proposal shall take precedence over the Consultant's Proposal.
3. The City's responsibility is described on Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
PAYMENT TERMS
4. The City agrees to pay the Consultant and the Consultant agrees to receive a "Not- to- Exceed" fee of $ 4,319,611.00 in accordance with the payment terms provided on Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
TIME FO
R PERFORMANCE
5. The Consultant shall commence services upon receipt of written direction to proceed from the City.
6. The Consultant shall perform the work described on Exhibit "A" in accordance with the schedule outlined in this Exhibit, which is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.
7. This Agreement shall be effective from effective date and shall continue in full force and effect da
te through June 30, 2030 , subject to any earlier t ermination in accordance with this Agreement. The services of Consultant shall be completed in a sequence assuring expeditious completion, but
in any event, all such services shall be completed prior to expiration of this Agreement.
8. (a) The Consultant agrees that the personnel, including the principal Project manager, DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
3 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
and all subconsultants assigned to the Project by the Consultant, shall be subject to the prior approval of the City.
(b) No change in subconsultants or key personnel shall be made by the Consultant without written prior approval of the City.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
9. It is understood and agreed that the Consultant is, and at all times shall be, an independent Consultant and nothing contained herein shall be construed as making the Consultant or any individual whose compensation for services is paid by the Consultant, an agent or employee of the City, or authorizing the Consultant to create or assume any obligation or lia bility for or on behalf of the City.
10. The Consultant may also retain or subcontract for the services of other necessary Consultants with the prior written approval of the City. Payment for such services shall be the responsibility of the Consultant. Any and all subconsultants employed by the Consultant shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, except that the City shall have no obligation to pay any subconsultant for services rendered on the Project.
11. The Consultant and the City agree to use reasonable care and diligence to perform their respective services under this Agreement.
12. The Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws in the performance of work under this Agreement.
13. To the extent required by controlling federal, state and local law, Consultant shall not employ discriminatory practices in the provision of services, employment of personnel, or in any other respect on the basis of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
4 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Subject to the foregoing and during the performance of this Agreement, Consultant agrees as follows:
(a) Consultant will comply with all applicable laws and regulations providing that no person shall, on the grounds of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under any program or activity made possible by or resulting from this Agreement.
(b) Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Consultant shall ensure that applicants are employed, and the employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era. Such requirement shall apply to Consultant’s employment practices including, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. Consul tant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices setting forth the provision of this nondiscrimination clause. (c) Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees plac ed by or DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
5 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
on behalf of Consultant in pursuit hereof, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, age , sexual orientation, ethnicity, status as a disabled veteran or veteran of the Vietnam era.
(d) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall cause each subconsultant to also comply with the requirements of this Section 13.
14. Indemnification.
(a) Design Professional Services.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, including but not limited to Civil Code Section 2782.8, in performing design professional services, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (“CSD”), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (“Housing Authority”), their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, costs (including reasonable attorney's fe es), or injuries to any person (including injury to Consultant's employees) arising out of, pertaining to, or relating to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subconsultants, or anyone under its control in the performance of professional services under this Agreement. This indemnity obligation specifically does not apply to liability arising from (1) the sole negligence, (2) active negligence, or (3) willful misconduct of the City, CSD, or Housing Authority. (b) Non-Design Professional Services and Construction Work.
For all services that are not design professional services and for any construction -related work, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, CSD, and Housing Authority, their DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
6 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, costs (including reasonable attorney's fees), injuries to any person (including injury to Consultant's employees), stop payment notices, direct and indirect job site losses, and losses of any kind arising from or connected with the performance of the work, including but not limited to defective wor kmanship, non-compliance with Contract Documents, or damage to adjacent properties. This indemnity obligation does not apply to liability arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnified parties.
If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each sub consultant to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.
CalPERS Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, in addition to obligations set forth in this section, in the event that any person providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of the City, to the fullest extent of the law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for any costs and expenses incurred by City, including without limitation, payment that City is required as a result to make to CalPERS, whether in the form of employee and/or employer contributions, taxes, or any similar obligations, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest.
CalPERS Participation. As set forth in this Agreement and in the Request for Qualifications, City has an obligation to treat all persons working for or under the direction of Consultant as an independent Consultant of City and agents and employees of Consultant, and not as agents or employees of City. C onsultant and City acknowledge and agree that City participates in a defined benefit plan DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
7 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
(“CalPERS”), and that it is possible that CalPERS may find that persons providing services pursuant to this Agreement are employees of City and should be registered with the CalPERS as employees of City.
CalPERS Retiree Disclosure . Consultant hereby expressly agrees to clearly and conspicuously disclose to City in writing any and all persons working for Consultant who are retirees under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) whom receives a monthly CalPERS retirement allowance, and whom are, subject to City approval, assigned by Consultant to provide services to City under the Agreement, prior to such person performing any services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted to limit a CalPERS retiree’s obligations under applicable law, rules or regulations.
Joint Cooperation . In the event that CalPERS initiates an inquiry that includes examination of whether individuals providing services under this Agreement to City are City’s employees, Consultant shall within five days and share all communications and documents from CalPERS that it may legally share. In the event that either Consultant or City files an appeal or court challenge, Consultant and City each agree to cooperate with each other in responding to the inquiry and any subsequent administrative appeal or court challenge of an adverse determination.
This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.
15. Insurance.
(a) Throughout the life of this Agreement, Consultant shall pay for and maintain in full force and effect all insurance as required or as may be authorized in writing by the C ity Manager or his/her designee at any time and in his/her sole discretion.
(b) If at any time during the life of the Agreement or any extension, Consultant or any of its subconsultants fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all services and work DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
8 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
under this Agreement shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Consultant shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City.
Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for C ity to terminate this Agreement. No action taken by C ity pursuant to this se ction shall in any way relieve Consultant of its responsibilities under this Agreement. The phrase “fail to maintain any required insurance” shall include, without limitation, notification received by City that an insurer has commenced proceedings, or has had proceedings commenced against it, indicating that the insurer is insolvent. (c) The fact that insurance is obtained by Consultant shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Consultant, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Agreement. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Consultant. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Consultant, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Consultant , vendors, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub-consultants, subconsultants, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them. (d) Upon request of C ity, Consultant shall immediately furnish C ity with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Agreement, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.
(e) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Agreement, Consultant shall require each sub consultant to provide insurance protection in DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
9 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
favor of City and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of this section, except that any required certificates and applicable endorsements shall be on file with Consultant and City prior to the commencement of any services by the subconsultant. (f) Where determined applicable by the City, Consultant will comply with the following insurance requirements at its sole expense. Insurance companies shall be rated (A Minus: VII-Admitted) or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide and shall be legally licensed and qualified to conduct business in the State of California.
Minimum Scope of Insurance: Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1. The most current version of Insurance Services Office (ISO) Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 covering on an “occurrence” basis, which shall include insurance for "bodily injury," "property damage" and "personal and advertising injury" wi th coverage for premises and operations, products and completed operations, and contractual liability.
2. The most current version of Insurance Service Office (ISO) Business Auto Coverage Form CA 00 01, which shall include coverage for all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles or other licensed vehicles (Code 1- Any Auto).
3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, California Labor Code and Employer's Liability Insurance, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance appropriate to Consultant’s profession.
Minimum Limits of Insurance:
1. General Liability Insurance. Without limiting the generality of the forgoing, to protect against loss from liability imposed by law for damages on account of bodily injury, including death, and/or property damage suffered or alleged to be suffered by any person or persons whomever, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or activities of the Consultant, sub-contractor, or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
10 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
or direction. Such insurance shall be maintained in full force and effect throughout the terms of this Agreement and any extension thereof in the minimum amounts provided below:
• $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage • $1,000,000 per occurrence for personal and advertising injury • $2,000,000 aggregate for products and completed operations • $2,000,000 general aggregate
2. Automobile Liability
• $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage
3. Employer's Liability (Worker's Compensation)
• $1,000,000 each accident for bodily injury
• $1,000,000 disease each employee
• $1,000,000 disease policy limit
4. Workers' Compensation insurance policy: In such amounts as will fully comply with the laws of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for both the Consultant and the City, HA, and CSD against any loss, claim or damage arising from any injuries or occupational diseases happening to any worker employed by the Consultant in the course of carrying out this Agreement. Workers' Compensation insurance policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provision: Consultant and its insurer shall waive any right of subrogation against City of Moreno Valley, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
5. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions):
• $1,000,000 per occurrence/ claim
• $2,000,000 policy aggregate.
6. Endorsements. Unless otherwise specified hereunder, each insurance policy required DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
11 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
herein shall be with insurers possessing a Best’s rating of no less than A,VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
• The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the City, its appointed officials, officers, employees or agents.
Umbrella or Excess Insurance
In the event Consultant purchases an Umbrella or Excess insurance policy(ies) to meet the “Minimum Limits of Insurance,” this insurance policy(ies) shall “follow form” and afford no less coverage than the primary insurance policy(ies).
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Consultant shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policy(ies ) required hereunder and Consultant shall also be responsible for payment of any self-insured retentions.
Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers; or (ii) Consultant shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to the City Manager or his/her designee, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or self-insured retentions Other Insurance Provisions:
The General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers Compensation insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds.
DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
12 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
2) The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
3) Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City.
The Workers’ Compensation insurance policy is to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provision: Consultant and its insurer shall waive any right of subrogation against City, CSD, Housing Authority and each of their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
If the Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) insurance policy is written on a claims-made form:
1) The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant.
2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 3 years after any expiration or termination of the Agreement or, in the alternative, the policy shall be endorsed to provide not less than a 3-year discovery period. 3) If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Agreement or the commencement of work by Consultant, Consultant must purchase extended reporting coverage for a minimum of 3 years following the expiration or termination of the Agreement. 4) A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review. 5) These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Agreement.
All polices of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non -renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Consultant shall furnish the City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for the City, Consultant shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.
Acceptability of Insurers: All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be placed with an insurance company(ies) admitted by the California Insurance Commissioner to do business in the State of California DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
13 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
and rated not less than "A - VII" in Best's Insurance Rating Guide; or authorized by the City Manager or designee.
Verification of Coverage : Consultant shall furnish City with all certificates(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received and approved by the City Manager or designee prior to City’s execution of this Agreement and before work commences. The following applicable endorsements will be required:
1) Additional Insured endorsement for ongoing operations, completed operations and primary & non-contributory endorsement for general liability coverage 2) Additional Insured endorsement for auto liability coverage 3) Waiver of Subrogation for workers compensation coverage
16. The waiver by either party of a breach by the other of any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver or a waiver of any subsequent breach of either the same or a different provision of this Agreement. No provisions of this Agreement may be waived unless in writing and signed by all parties to this Agreement. Waiver of any one provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other provision herein.
17. Prevailing Wage Requirements.
(a) Consultant and all subconsultants shall comply with California Labor Code §§ 1720 -1861 regarding payment of prevailing wage rates for covered work. Consultant shall pay not less than prevailing wage rates as determined by the Director of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall post applicable wage determinations at each project site.
(b) For contracts over $30,000, Consultant shall comply with apprentice employment requirements under Labor Code § 1777.5. Consultant shall be responsible for compliance with apprentice requirements by all subconsultants.
DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
14 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
(c) Consultant shall maintain accurate payroll records in compliance with Labor Code § 1776, including employee names, addresses, social security numbers, work classifications, straight time and overtime hours worked, and actual wages paid. Consultant shall certify and submit payroll records to the City or Division of Labor Standards Enforcement upon request. (d) Consultant acknowledges that failure to pay prevailing wages will subject Consultant to penalties under Labor Code §§ 1775 and 1813. The City may withhold contract payments to cover unpaid wages and penalties.
(e) Pursuant to Labor Code § 1725.5, Consultant and all subconsultants performing covered work must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). Consultant shall verify subconsultant DIR registration prior to subcontracting. This Project is subject to DIR compliance monitoring and enforcement.
(f) Consultant shall include these requirements in all subcontracts for covered work and ensure subconsultant compliance.
18. (a) The Consultant shall deliver to the Public Works Director/City Engineer of the City or his designated representative , fully completed and detailed project -related documents which shall become the property of the City. The Consultant may retain, for its files, copies of any and all material, including drawings, documents, and specifications, produced by the Consultant in performance of this Agreement.
(b) The Consultant shall be entitled to copies of all furnished materials for his files and his subconsultants, if any.
(c) The City agrees to hold the Consultant free and harmless from any claim arising from any unauthorized use of computations, maps, and other documents prepared or provided by the DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
15 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
Consultant under this Agreement, if used by the City on other work without the permission of the Consultant. Consultant acknowledges that Consultant work product produced under this agreement may be public record under State law.
19. (a) This Agreement shall terminate without any liability of City to Consultant upon the earlier of: (i) C onsultant’s filing for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws, or any bankruptcy petition or petition for receiver commenced by a third party against C onsultant; (ii) 10 calendar days prior written notice with or without cause by C ity to Consultant; (iii) City’s non-appropriation of funds sufficient to meet its obligations hereunder during any City fiscal year of this Agreement, or insufficient funding for the Project; or (iv) expiration of this Agreement. The written notice shall specify the date of termination. Upon receipt of such notice, the Consultant may continue services on the project through the date of termination, provided that no service(s) shall be commenced or continued after receipt of the notice, which is not intended to protect the interest of the City. The City shall pay the Consultant within thirty (30) days after the date of termination for all non- objected to services perfo rmed by the Consultant in accordance herewith through the date of termination. Consultant shall not be paid for any work or services performed or costs incurred which reasonably could have been avoided. (b) In the event of termination due to failure of C onsultant to satisfactorily perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, C ity may withhold an amount that would otherwise be payable as an offset to, but not in excess of, City’s damages caused by such failure. In no event shall any payment by City pursuant to this Agreement constitute a waiver by City of any breach of this Agreement which may then exist on the part of Consultant, nor shall such payment impair or prejudice any remedy available to City with respect to the breach.
(c) Upon any breach of this Agreement by Consultant, City may (i) exercise any right, remedy DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
16 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
(in contract, law or equity), or privilege which may be available to it under applicable laws of the State of California or any other applicable law; (ii) proceed by appropriate court action to enforce the terms of the Agreement; and/or (iii) recover all direct, indirect, consequential, economic and incidental damages for the breach of the Agreement. If it is determined that C ity improperly terminated this Agreement for default, such termination shall be deemed a termination for convenience. (d) C onsultant shall be liable for default unless non-performance is caused by an occurrence beyond the reasonable control of Consultant and without its fault or negligence such as, acts of God or the public enemy, acts of City in its contractual capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, unusually severe weather, and delays of common carriers. Consultant shall notify City in writing as soon as it is reasonably possible after the commencement of any excusable delay, setting forth the full particulars in connection therewith, and shall remedy such occurrence with all reasonable dispatch, and shall promptly give written notice to Administrator of the cessation of such occurrence.
20. This Agreement is binding upon the City and the Consultant and their successors and assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, neither the City nor the Consultant shall assign, sublet, or transfer its interest in this Agreement or any part thereof without the prior written consent of the other.
21. A City representative shall be designated by the City and a Consultant representative shall be designated by the Consultant. The City representative and the Consultant representative shall be the primary contact person for each party regarding performance of this Agreement. The City representative shall cooperate with the Consultant, and the Consultant's representative shall cooperate with the City in all matters regarding this Agreement and in such a manner as will result in the performance of the services in a timely and expeditious fashion.
22. This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the City and DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
17 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
the Consultant, and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or Agreements, either written or oral. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a subsequent written Agreement signed by both parties.
23. Where the payment terms provide for compensation on a time and materials basis, the Consultant shall maintain adequate records to permit inspection and audit of the Consultant's time and materials charges under this Agreement. The Consultant shall make such records available to the City at the Consultant's office during normal business hours upon reasonable notice. Nothing herein shall convert such records into public records. Except as may be otherwise required by law, such records will be available only to the City. Such records shall be maintained by the Consultant for three (3) years following completion of the services under this Agreement.
24. The City and the Consultant agree, that to the extent permitted by law, all data shall be treated as confidential and will not be released to third parties without the prior written consent of both parties, both during the term of this Agreement and after its expiration or termination; provided, however, that nothing in this Section shall restrict the City's ability to disclose records as required by the California Public Records Act (Government Code § 6250 et seq.) or other applicable law.
25. (a) C onsultant shall comply, and require its subc onsultants to comply, with all applicable (i) professional canons and requirements governing avoidance of impermissible client conflicts; and (ii) federal, state and local conflict of interest laws and regulations including, without limitation, California Government Code Section 1090 et. seq., the California Political Reform Act (California Government Code Section 87100 et. seq.) and the regulations of the Fair Political Practices Commission concerning disclosure and disqualification (2 California Code of Regulation s Section 18700 et. seq.). At any time, upon written request of City, Consultant shall provide a written opinion of its legal DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
18 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
counsel and that of any subc onsultant that, after a due diligent inquiry, Consultant and the respective subconsultant(s) are in full compliance with all laws and regulations. Consultant shall take, and require its subc onsultants to take, reasonable steps to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest. Upon discovery of any facts giving rise to the appearance of a conflict of interest, Consultant shall immediately notify City of these facts in writing.
(b) In performing the work or services to be provided hereunder, Consultant shall not employ or retain the services of any person while such person either is employed by City or is a member of any City council, commission, board, committee, or similar City body. This requirement may be waived in writing by the City Manager, if no actual or potential conflict is involved. (c) Consultant represents and warrants that it has not paid or agreed to pay any compensation, contingent or otherwise, direct or indirect, to solicit or procure this Agreement or any rights/benefits hereunder.
(d) Neither Consultant, nor any of Consultant’s subconsultants performing any services on this Project, shall bid for, assist anyone in the preparation of a bid for, or perform any services pursuant to, any other contract in connection with this Project unless fully disclosed to and approved by the City Manager, in advance and in writing. Consultant and any of its sub consultants shall have no interest, direct or indirect, in any other contract with a third party in connection with this Project unless such interest is in accordance with all applicable law and fully disclosed to and approved by the City Manager, in advance and in writing. Notwithstanding any approval given by the City Manager under this provision, Consultant shall remain responsible for complying with Section 25(a), above. (e) If Consultant should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed or services to be provided under this Agreement, Consultant shall include the provisions of this Section 25 DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
19 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
in each subcontract and require its subconsultants to comply therewith. (f) This Section 25 shall survive expiration or termination of this Agreement.
26. All Plans, drawings, Specifications, reports, logs, and other documents prepared by the Consultant in its performance under this Agreement shall, upon completion of the project, be delivered to and be the property of the City, provided that the Consultant shall be entitled, at its own expense, to make copies thereof for its own use.
27. The laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement, and shall also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Venue shall be vested in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Riverside.
28. Supplementary General Provisions. (For projects that are funded by Federal programs).
The following provisions, pursuant to 44 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 13, Subpart C, Section 13.36, as it may be amended from time to time, are included in the Agreement and are required to be included in all subcontracts entered into by Consultant for work pursuant to the Agreement, unless otherwise expressly provided herein. These provisions supersede any conflicting provisions in the General Conditions and shall take precedence over the General Conditions for purposes of interpretation of the General Conditions. These provisions do not otherwise modify or replace General Conditions not in direct conflict with these provisions. Definitions used in these provisions are as contained in the General Conditions.
a) Consultant shall be subject to the administrative, contractual, and legal remedies provided in the General Conditions in the event Consultant violates or breaches terms of the Agreement.
b) CITY may terminate the Agreement for cause or for convenience, and Consultant may terminate the Agreement, as provided the General Conditions. c) Consultant shall comply with Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled Equal Employment Opportunity, as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
20 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
CFR chapter 60). (All construction contracts awarded in excess of $10,000 by CITY and/or subcontracts in excess of $10,000 entered into by Consultant.) d) Consultant shall comply with the Copeland Anti -Kickback Act ( 18 U.S.C. 874 ) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3) (All contracts and subcontracts for construction or repair.)
e) Consultant shall comply with the Davis -Bacon Act ( 40 U.S.C. 276a to 276a7) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). f) Consultant shall comply with Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act ( 40 U.S.C. 327330) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5).
g) Consultant shall observe CITY requirements and regulations pertaining to reporting included in the General Conditions.
h) Patent rights with respect to any discovery or invention which arises or is developed in the course of or under the Agreement shall be retained by the CITY. i) Copyrights and rights in data developed in the course of or under the Agreement shall be the property of the CITY. FEMA/CalOES reserve a royalty -free, nonexclusive, irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use or authorize to others to use for federal purposes a copyright in any work developed under the Agreement and/or subcontracts for work pursuant to the Agreement. j) Consultant shall provide access by the City, the Federal grantor agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives to any books, documents, papers, and records of the Consultant which are directly pertinent to that specific contract for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts, and transcriptions.
k) Consultant shall retain all required records for three years after CITY makes final payments and all other pending matters relating to the Agreement are closed. l) Consultant shall comply with all applicable standards, orders, or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1857(h)), section 508 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1368), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental DRAFT
AGREEMENT FOR PROJECT
RELATED SERVICES
PROJECT NO.
21 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
Protection Agency regulations (40 CFR part 15). (This provision applies to contracts exceeding $100,000 and to subcontracts entered into pursuant to such contracts.) m) Consultant shall comply with mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the State energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94163, 89 Stat. 871).
29 . Waiver of Civil Code Section 1542 and CalPERS-Related Disclosures.
Consultant expressly waives any and all rights and benefits conferred by Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides:
"A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party."
Consultant’s waiver is intended to extend to any and all claims, known or unknown, arising out of or relating to this Agreement, including but not limited to any claims of entitlement to benefits under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) arising from alleged misclassification as an employee. Consultant acknowledges that it has had the opportunity to seek the advice of legal counsel regarding the meaning and effect of this waiver.
Consultant further agrees to disclose in writing to the City the identity of any persons performing services under this Agreement who are retirees receiving CalPERS retirement benefits, prior to such persons performing any work. Consultant shall ensure com pliance with all applicable CalPERS rules, laws, and regulations regarding post-retirement employment.
30. Authority to Execute.
Each person signing this Agreement represents and warrants that he or she has full authority to bind the party on whose behalf the signature is made, and that all necessary approvals for such execution have been obtained.
SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS
DRAFT
22 Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
IN W
ITNESS HEREOF, the parties have each caused their authorized representative to execute this Agreement.
City of Moreno Valley Steinberg Hart
BY: BY:
Cit y Manager
Name:
TIT
LE:
(Pr esident or Vice President)
Date
Date
BY:
Name:
______
TIT
LE: ______
(Co rporate Secretary)
Da te
Enc
losures: Exhibit “A” – City Scope of Services
Exhibit “B” – Consultant Proposal
Exhibit “C” – City Services
Exhibit “D” – Terms of Payment
INTERNAL USE ONLY
APPRO
VED AS TO LEGAL FORM:
Cit y Attorney
Dat e
RECOM
MENDED FOR APPROVAL:
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Date
DRAFT
Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
EXHI
BIT A
SCO
PE OF SERVICES
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moren
o Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026 Public Works – Capital Projects Page 1 of 20
Request for Proposals
Professional Architectural and Engineering Design
Consultant Services for
Moreno Valley
Public Safety Campus
PROJECT NO. 803 0072
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
P.O. Box 8805
Moreno Valley, CA 92552
Proposal due date:
February 16, 2026, by 2:00 p.m., PST
Submit proposal online at:
https://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanyID=24660 Contact:
Capital Projects Division
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (951) 413-3130
EXHIBIT A
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 2 of 20
Table of Contents Page I Invitation ..................................................................................................... 3 II Project Description ...................................................................................... 3 III Procurement and Project Schedule ............................................................ 4 IV Scope of Services ....................................................................................... 4
1. Consultant Responsibilities and Team Requirements ........................ 4
2. Project Management and Coordination .............................................. 5
3. Site Evaluation and Master Planning ................................................. 5
4. Space Programming ........................................................................... 5
5. Code Analysis and Regulatory Coordination ...................................... 5
6. Environmental Clearance Support ..................................................... 6
7. Schematic Design (SD) ...................................................................... 6
8. Design Development (DD) ................................................................. 6
9. Security and Technology Systems ..................................................... 7
10. Sustainability and Resilience .............................................................. 7
11. Construction Documents (DD) ........................................................... 7
12. Bidding and Construction Phase Services ......................................... 7
13. Project Closeout ................................................................................. 8
14. Deliverables ........................................................................................ 8 V Proposal Format .......................................................................................... 8
1. Technical Proposal ............................................................................. 8
2. Fee Proposal ...................................................................................... 11 VI General Compliance with Laws Wage Rates .............................................. 13 VII Payment to Consultant and Invoicing .......................................................... 14 VIII Insurance .................................................................................................... 14 IX Indemnification ............................................................................................ 14 X Termination for Convenience of the City ..................................................... 15 XI Independent Contractor .............................................................................. 15 XII Contract ....................................................................................................... 15 XIII General Conditions ..................................................................................... 15 XIV Selection Criteria ......................................................................................... 16 XV Attachments ................................................................................................ 16 RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Servic
es
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026 Public Works – Capital Projects Page 3 of 20
I. Invitation
The City of
Moreno Valley is seeking proposals from qualified, experienced, and licensed architectural and engineering (“A&E”) firms, including their consultants, to provide design services and complete construction documentation and bid package necessary for the construction of the Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus (“Project”). The Project consists of the design and construction of a new Fire Station and a new Police Station together as a joint-use facility, including parking areas, on-site/off-site access routes, and related site improvements, on the City’s owned vacant land of approximately 14.7 acres located at the east end of the City.
You are hereby invited to submit a Proposal to provide A&E design services for this Project.
Interested parties may register and download copies of the Request for Proposal (RFP) via the City’s online vendor portal at:
http://www.planetbids.com/portal/portal.cfm?CompanyID=24660 Proposals shall be submitted electronically (in PDF format) utilizing this portal.
NOTE: The proposer shall submit a separate electronic file for the Technical Proposal and a separate electronic file for the Fee Proposal.
The proposer is solely responsible for “on time” submission of their electronic proposal. The City will only consider proposals that have been transmitted successfully and have been issued an ebid confirmation number with a time stamp from the Bid Management System indicating that the bid was submitted successfully. Transmission of proposals by any other means will not be accepted. Proposer shall be solely responsible for informing itself with respect to the proper utilization of the proposal management system, fo r ensuring the capability of their computer system to upload the required documents, and for the stability of their internet service. Failure of the proposer to successfully submit an electronic proposal shall be at the proposer’s sole risk, and no relief will be given for late and/or improperly submitted proposals. Proposers experiencing any technical difficulties with the proposal submission process may contact PlanetBids directly at (818) 992-1
771. Neither the City, nor PlanetBids, makes any guarantee as to the timely availability of assista
nce, or assurance that any given problem will be resolved by the proposal submission deadline.
II. Project
Description
The City of Moreno Valley (“City”) is soliciting
proposals from qualified professional consulting
firms to provide comprehensive space needs study and planning, architectural, engineering, and construction support services for the design and construction of a joint-use Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus serving the City’s Police and Fire Departments.
The proposed Project is to design and construct a public safety facility to be developed on approximately 14.7 acres of vacant land located at the northeast corner of Cactus Avenue and Merwin Street extension within the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. The facility could house a fire station and a police station and is intended to support 24-hour emergency operations, administrative functions, various shared uses and services, and should be designed to allow for future expansion consistent with City needs. Related site improvements, parking and storage areas, local access routes, and security fencing and gates are also included.
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 4 of 20
III. Procurement and Project Schedule
The City anticipates completing the Project by early fall of 2029 with the following aggressive schedule:
DATE EVENT
1 January 16, 2026 Request for Proposals issued
2 February 5, 2026, by 2:00 p.m. Deadline for Q & A via PlanetBids 3 February 16, 2026, by 2:00 p.m. Proposal due date
4 March 6, 2026 Proposals review and consultant selection complete 5 March 2026 Award of design services contract
6 April 2026 Start of service
7 July 2026
Completion of spacing program, conceptual
design, and rough project cost estimate
8 December 2027 Completion of the design
9 April 2028 Award of the construction contract
10 July 2028 Start Construction
11 October 2029 Project Completion
NOTE: It is critical to complete the spacing program and needs analysis to determine the size of the new building and parking areas, conceptual design of the building and overall site master plan, and a rough project cost estimate by July 2026. Staff will need this information to present to the City Council in early August 2026 for their direction on project construction funding.
IV. Scope of Services
1. Consultant Responsibilities and Team Requirements
The selected Consultant shall serve as the Prime Consultant and shall be responsible for the management, coordination, and performance of all professional services required to complete the Project. The Consultant shall provide all labor, materials, equipment, and subconsultants necessary to deliver the Project in accordance with applicable City, County, State, and Federal requirements.
The Consultant team shall include, at a minimum, the following disciplines, either in-house or through subconsultants:
Architect (Prime Consultant)
Civil Engineer
Structural Engineer
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 5 of 20
Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) Engineers
Fire Protection Engineer
Security / Low-Voltage Systems Consultant
Cost Estimator
Land Surveyor
Geotechnical Engineer
Environmental Consultant (CEQA support, as required)
All consultants shall be licensed in the State of California, as applicable.
2. Project Management and Coordination
The Consultant shall:
Conduct a project kickoff meeting with City staff and representatives from the Police Department and Fire Department
Develop and maintain a detailed project schedule identifying key milestones Conduct regular coordination meetings and workshops
Coordinate and review the work of all subconsultants prior to submittals Provide written meeting agendas, summaries, and action items Implement quality control and quality assurance procedures throughout all phases
3. Site Evaluation and Master Planning
Given the size of the Project buildable site relative to the proposed building, the Consultant shall prepare a conceptual site master plan to guide both initial development and future expansion.
Services shall include:
Evaluation of the 14.66-acre vacant site for public safety facility development Preparation of a conceptual site master plan addressing:
o Building placement and orientation
o Emergency vehicle access, circulation, and staging
o Separation of public, staff, and secure access
o Parking and service areas
o Landscape and security fencing
o Apparatus maneuvering requirements
o Future expansion areas and potential phasing
Review and coordination of boundary/topographic survey, hydrology and drainage study, and geotechnical investigation
Identification of site constraints, utility availability, drainage, and off-site improvement needs, especially local roadway access.
Perform site environmental assessment as required per development laws and regulations
4. Space Programming
The Consultant shall:
Conduct programming meetings with Police and Fire Department staff
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 6 of 20
Develop a detailed space program based on the future/projected needs Identify police, fire, and shared-use spaces
Define secure and non-secure areas
Establish functional adjacencies and circulation requirements Prepare space program documentation and area tabulations for City approval
5. Code Analysis and Regulatory Coordination
The Consultant shall perform a comprehensive code and regulatory analysis, including but not limited to:
California Building Code (CBC)
California Fire Code (CFC)
California Electrical, Mechanical, and Plumbing Codes ADA and CBC Chapter 11B accessibility requirements
Cal/OSHA requirements
City of Moreno Valley Municipal Code
The Consultant shall:
Identify occupancy classifications, construction type, and fire-resistive requirements Prepare life-safety and exiting concepts
Coordinate with the City’s Building Official, Fire Marshal, and other reviewing agencies
6. Environmental Clearance Support
The Consultant shall assist the City with environmental review and approval, including:
Technical support for compliance with the Cali fornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as required
Preparation of technical exhibits and documentation for CEQA review and approval Participation in meetings and public hearings as required Response to agency and public comments
7. Schematic Design (SD)
The Consultant shall prepare schematic design documents, including:
Site plan
Building floor plans
Massing studies and preliminary elevations
Secure circulation and access concepts
Preliminary structural and MEP concepts
The Consultant shall provide a preliminary construction cost estimate and present the schematic design to the City for review and approval.
8. Design Development (DD)
The Consultant shall:
Advance the design to the Design Development level
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 7 of 20
Fully coordinate architectural, civil, structural, and MEP systems Develop site grading, drainage, and utility plans
Design emergency power and backup systems suitable for critical public safety operations
Refine security, technology, and special systems
Update the construction cost estimate
9. Security and Technology Systems
The Consultant shall design and coordinate specialized systems, including:
Access control systems
CCTV and video surveillance
Duress and alarm systems
Secure evidence and records storage
Communications and radio infrastructure
Coordination with City IT and emergency management systems
10. Sustainability and Resilience
The Consultant shall:
Ensure compliance with California Title 24 energy standards Incorporate energy-efficient and durable building systems Address water efficiency and stormwater management requirements Design for seismic resilience and post-disaster operability Incorporate solar-ready or renewable energy features
Make recommendations regarding sustainable options to consider in the construction of the Project as prescribed by LEED standards.
Make recommendations regarding alternative materials or design features that offer potential cost savings while meeting desired quality standards
11. Construction Documents (CD)
The Consultant shall prepare complete and coordinated 100% construction drawings and specifications, including:
Architectural, civil, structural, and MEP plans
Technical specifications
Responses to plan check comments
Support for permits and approvals from all reviewing agencies Final engineer’s construction cost estimate
12. Bidding and Construction Phase Services
During bidding and construction, the Consultant shall:
Assist with bid-phase questions and preparation of addenda Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs)
Participate in review and analysis of bids and provide results/recommendations to award Review submittals and shop drawings
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 8 of 20
Conduct periodic construction site visits
Assist with the evaluation of change orders and pay applications Prepare punch lists and support substantial completion
13. Project Closeout
The Consultant shall:
Support commissioning of building systems
Provide record (as-built) drawings
Assist the City with obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy Provide training to City staff
Provide warranty-period support
14. Deliverables
Deliverables shall include, but are not limited to:
Conceptual site master plan
Approved space program
Schematic Design, Design Development, and Construction Documents Construction cost estimates and project schedule at each phase Environmental clearance and permit exhibits
Record drawings and closeout documentation
V. Proposal Format
Proposals shall be submitted electronically (in PDF format) utilizing the above City’s vendor portal.
The proposer shall submit a separate electronic file for their technical proposal and a separate electronic file for the cost proposal.
The Consultant’s Proposal shall be no more than 25 pages, excluding a cover letter of up to two pages, dividers, and certificates. Proposals fa iling to provide sufficient information and assurances of performance to accurately assess each category of the required services and failing to comply with the requirements and conditions of the RFP will not be given further consideration.
1. Technical Proposal
At a minimum Technical Proposal should include, but not be limited to, the following items:
a. Project Understanding: This section should clearly convey a clear understanding of the nature of the work, identification of major project issues and proposed solutions thereof, from both the Consultant and the sub-consultants (Consultant Team).
b. Design Approach and Management Plan : This section provides the Consultant Team’s proposed approach and management plan for providing services. Include an organization chart showing proposed relationships among Consultant Team/staff as well as any other parties that may have a significant role in the delivery of this Project.
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 9 of 20
c. Qualifications and Experience : Provide the qualifications and experience of the team for this project. Emphasize the specific qualifications and experience from projects similar to this Project for the key team members, including references. Identify and provide in- depth information for the proposed project manager’s qualifications, track record and relevant experience.
d. Staffing Plan: Discuss the staffing plan and the current and anticipated workloads for all key team members and their capacity to perform the requested services according to the proposed schedule. Discuss the firm's/team’s approach for completing the services required for this Project within budget and schedule.
e. Work Plan and Schedule: Include a description of how each task of the Project will be conducted and identify deliverables for each task and implementation schedule. The work plan should include sufficient detail to demonstrate a clear understanding of the project. Discuss the Consultant Team’s approach for completing the Project.
f. Quality Control and Assurance : Discuss QA/QC proposed for each phase/deliverable for this Project, including various independent plan check reviews and 95% Plan Biddability/Constructability/Claims Avoidance reviews.
g. Additional Relevant Information: Provide additional relevant information that may be helpful in the selection process (not to exceed two pages).
The following statements are required to be included in the proposal:
a) A statement that this RFP shall be incorporated in its entirety as a part of the Consultant's Proposal.
b) A statement that this RFP and the Consult ant's Proposal will jointly become part of the Agreement for Professional Consultant Servic es for this Project when said Agreement is fully executed by the Consultant and the City of Moreno Valley.
c) A statement that the Consultant’s Services to be provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City's RFP except as otherwise specified in the Consultant's Proposal under the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL."
d) A single and separate section with the heading "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROP OSAL" (if needed) containing a complete and detailed description of all of the exceptions to the provisions and conditions of this RFP upon which the Consultant’s Proposal is contingent and which shall take precedent over this RFP.
NOTE: EXCEPTIONS TO THE INDEMNIFICATION, LIABILITY, AND TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY CLAUSES OF THE CITY’S STANDARD "AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES” SHALL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE. ANY EXCEPTIONS TO THESE CLAUSES SHALL DISQUALIFY THE CONSULTANT'S PROPOSAL FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION.
e) A statement of qualifications applicable to this Project, including the names, qualifications, and proposed duties of the Consultant’s Staff to be assigned to this Project; a listing of
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 10 of 20
recent similar projects completed, including the names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the appropriate persons whom the City could contact. If one or more of the Consultant’s staff should become unavailable, the Consultant may substitute for other staff of at least equal competence only after prior written approval by the City.
f) A statement that the Consultant acknowledges providing all necessary vehicles, equipment, tools, uniforms, all incidentals for the staff member(s) to perform the required services. Full compensation for providing vehicles, equipment, tools, uniforms, all incidentals shall be considered to be included in the ‘Not-to-Exceed” fee as part of the Fee Proposal, and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.
g) A resource allocation matrix must be submitted with the Proposal. The resource allocation matrix must list detailed tasks in rows and the appropriate individual (Job Title Only) as well as the number of hours that these individuals will be working on each task listed, will be included in adjacent columns.
h) A statement that the Consultant acknowledges and understands that the Consultant will provide a qualified alternate staff in the event that the primary staff member is not able to come to work.
i) A statement that all charges for Consultant services are a “Not-to-Exceed” fee which must include conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses, as submitted with and made a part of said Consultant's Proposal.
j) A statement that the Consultant will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City. This may include preparation of the field and final reports, or similar evidence of attainment of the Agreement objectives.
k) A statement that said hourly rate schedule (which is to be included in the Fee Proposal as required below) is part of the Consultant's Proposal for use in invoicing for progress payments and for extra work incurred that is not part of this RFP.
l) A statement that the Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
m) A statement that all federal laws and regulations shall be adhered to, notwithstanding any state or local laws and regulations. In a case of conflict between federal, state, or local laws or regulations, the strictest shall be adhered to.
n) A statement that the Consultant shall allow all authorized federal, state, county, and City officials access to the place of work, books, documents, papers, fiscal, payroll, materials, and other relevant contract records pertinent to this Project. All relevant records shall be retained for at least three years.
o) A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standards Act (40 USC 276-a through a-7), and the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto (29 CFR Section 1, 5), any amendments thereof and the California Labor Code.
Pursuant to the said regulations, entitled “Federal Labor Standards Provisions,” Federal Prevailing Wage Decision,” and State of California prevailing wage rates, respectively.
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 11 of 20
p) A statement that the Consultant shall comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 USC 874) and the Implementation Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any amendments thereof.
q) A statement that the Consultant offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the subcontract. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time the City tenders final payment to the Consultant, without further acknowledgment by the parties.
2. Fee Proposal
a. General Requirements
Proposers shall submit a separate Fee Proposal that clearly and concisely identifies all costs associated with providing the services described in the Scope of Services. The Fee Proposal shall be submitted via the City’s online vendor portal and with the Technical Proposal.
The Fee Proposal shall represent the total not-to-exceed cost to provide the requested professional services.
b. Fee Structure
The City anticipates entering into an agreement based on a lump-sum fee by project phase , with progress payments tied to completion of defined deliverables.
Fees shall be broken down by the following phases, at a minimum:
a. Project Management & Coordination
b. Site Evaluation & Master Planning
c. Space Programming
d. Environmental & Entitlement Support
e. Schematic Design (SD)
f. Design Development (DD)
g. Construction Documents (CD)
h. Bidding Support
i. Construction Phase Services
j. Project Closeout
Each phase shall include a clearly identified lump-sum fee.
c. Fee Proposal Content
The Fee Proposal shall include the following:
i. Summary Fee Table
A summary table identifying:
Lump-sum fee by phase
Subtotal for all phases
Total not-to-exceed contract amount
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 12 of 20
ii. Labor Breakdown
For each phase, provide:
Labor categories/titles
Hourly billing rates
Estimated hours by labor category
The City recognizes that actual hours may vary; however, this information is required for evaluation and negotiation purposes.
d. Reimbursable Expenses
Reimbursement costs related to vehicle/transportation, mileage, printing, telephone, photograph, postage and delivery, equipment, tools, uniforms, all incidentals are to be included in the “Not-to- Exceed” Fee.
e. Subconsultant Fees
The Fee Proposal shall:
Identify each subconsultant
Provide a fee breakdown by subconsultant and phase
Clearly indicate which services are performed by the Prime Consultant versus subconsultants
The Prime Consultant shall be fully responsible for the performance and management of all subconsultants.
f. Assumptions and Exclusions
The Consultant shall clearly state:
Any assumptions used in developing the fee proposal
Any exclusions from the proposed scope of services
Any services not specifically excluded shall be deemed included in the proposed fee.
g. Additional Services
The Fee Proposal shall identify:
A schedule of hourly rates to be used for potential additional services not included in the base scope
Confirmation that additional services shall only be performed upon written authorization from the City
h. Fee Evaluation
Fee Proposals will be evaluated based on:
Completeness and clarity
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 13 of 20
Reasonableness and competitiveness of fees
Consistency with the proposed Scope of Services
Alignment with the project schedule and City expectations
The City reserves the right to:
Negotiate fees with the highest-ranked firm
Reject any or all Fee Proposals
Request clarification or additional information
i. City’s Right to Modify Scope
The City reserves the right to:
Modify the scope of services
Add or delete project phases
Adjust fees accordingly through written amendment
VI. GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND WAGE RATES
The Consultant shall be required to comply with all federal, state, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work. This includes compliance with prevailing wage rates and their payment in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1775.
The Consultant is required to submit certified payrolls weekly. This applies to all applicable field personnel working on the Project. In accordance with Section 1771.5 (b) (5) of the California Labor Code, the City will withhold payments when the payroll records are delinquent or inadequate.
Consultant expressly waives any and all rights and benefits conferred upon it by the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code which reads as follows:
“A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release and that, if known by him or her, would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party.”
This waiver shall be effective as a bar to any and all actions, fees, damages, losses, claims, liabilities and demands of whatsoever character, nature and kind that are known or unknown, or suspected or unsuspected, including, without limitation, claims of entitlements under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) that are only afforded to employees and not independent contractors. Consultant further represents and warrants that it understands this waiver and that if it does not understand this waiver, it shall seek the advice of a qualified attorney before executing this Agreement.
Consultant hereby expressly agrees to clearly and conspicuously disclose to City in writing any and all persons working for Consultant who are re tirees under the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) whom receives a monthly CalPERS retirement allowance, which may provide services to City under the Agreement, prior to such person performing any services thereunder. Nothing herein shall be deemed or interpreted to limited a CalPERS retiree’s obligations under applicable law, rules or regulations.
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 14 of 20
VII. PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT AND INVOICING
1. This work is to be performed for a “Not-to-Exceed” Fee.
2. The Consultant shall provide a “Fee Proposal” indicating the fee for individual staff member(s) with a “Not-to-Exceed” Fee which shall be the sum of all costs as described above.
3. Consultant invoices shall be submitted to the City monthly for review and approval for payments.
4. Invoices shall identify job title, person-hours, and costs incurred by each staff member.
5. The City will pay the Consultant for work completed each month.
6. Reimbursement costs related to vehicle/transportation, mileage, printing, telephone, photograph, postage and delivery, equipment, tools, uniforms, and all incidentals are to be included in the “Not-to-Exceed” Fee.
7. When the Consultant is performing, or is requested to perform, work beyond the scope of service in the “Agreement for Professional C onsultant Services,” an “Amendment to the Agreement” will be executed between the City and Consultant.
8. The Consultant shall receive no compensation for any re-work necessary as result of the Consultant’s errors, omissions, or oversight.
VIII. INSURANCE
Refer to Exhibit E of the Sample Agreement (Attachment D) for insurance requirements.
IX. INDEMNIFICATION
1. The Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and save the City of Moreno Valley, the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liability, claims, demands, damages, or injuries to any pe rson, including injury to the Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent acts of the Consultant, its officers, agents or employees, or its subconsultant(s) or any person acting for the Consultant or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or employees.
2. The City agrees to indemnify, defend and save the Consultant and their officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all liabilit y, claims, damages or injuries to any person, including injury to the City's, MVHA’s, and CSD's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the negligent performance or failure to perform the services or other obligations of the City under this Agreement, or are caused or claim to be caused by the negligent acts of the City, MVHA, and CSD, their officers, agents or
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 15 of 20
employees, or its subcontractor(s) or any person acting for the City or under its control or direction; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include any claims arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Consultant, its officers, agents, or employees (PCC 20103.6).
X. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY
The City reserves the right to terminate the "Agreement for Professional Consultant Services" for the "convenience of the City" at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. All finished or unfinished drawings, maps, documents, field notes and other materials produced and procured by the Consultant under the said aforementioned Agreement is, at the option of the City, City property and shall be delivered to the City by the Consultant within ten (10) working days from the date of such termination. The City will reimburse the Consultant for all acceptable work performed as set forth in the executed Agreement.
XI. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
The Consultant's relationship to the City in the performance of the Consultant's services for this Project is that of an independent Contractor. The personnel performing the said Services shall at all times be under the Consultant's exclusive direction and control and shall be employees of the Consultant and not employees of the City. The Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries and other amounts due to his employees in connection with the performance of said work shall be responsible for all employee reports and obligations , including but not necessarily restricted to, social security, income tax withholding, unemployment compensation, and Workers’ Compensation.
XII. CONTRACT
The Contract includes the Agreement for Professional Consultant Services, City's Request for Proposal, Consultant's Proposal, and Exhibits. The Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code require that Consultants be considered as potential filers of Statements of Economic Interest. Consultants, as defined by Section 18701, may be required to file an Economic Interest Statement (Form 700) within 30 days of signing a Consultant Agreement with the City, on an annual basis thereafter if the contract is still in place, and within 30 days of completion of the contract.
XIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by the Consultant in: (1) preparing the Proposal; (2) submitting the Proposal to the City; (3) presentation during the selection interview; (4) negotiating with the City any matter related to this Proposal; (5) any other expenses incurred by the Consultant prior to an executed Agreement.
The City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by the Consultant.
2. The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any Agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone reviewing the
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Public Works – Capital Projects Page 16 of 20
Proposal for its own convenience and to reject any and all Proposals responding to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s).
3. The City reserves the right to reject any or all Proposals submitted. Any Contract awarded for these Consultant engagements will be made to the Consultant who, in the opinion of the City, is best qualified.
XIV. SELECTION CRITERIA
1. The Firm’s General Experience and Qualification Information (25 points)
Information about the company, including professional licenses held; ability to furnish required insurance and meet stipulations of the City’s “boiler plate” agreement; details about comparable projects completed by the firm, as well as local experience; and its ability to provide the required services efficiently and expeditiously.
2. Experience of Key Personnel and Project Team (30 points)
Background experience of key personnel and the team on public safety facility design, credentials and certifications, abilities, familiarity with state and federal procedures and applicable standards and specifications, local experience on comparable projects, and length of service with the firm, reference information preferably with municipal agencies, and proven track record and depth of understanding/knowledge of the required services.
3. Project Understanding and Technical Approach (30 points)
Understanding of the Project’s needs, requested services, and tasks. Understanding of public safety operations, security requirements, and 24/7 functionality. Discussion of major issues identified on the Project and how the Consultant team plans to address them; the methods and procedures to be used for providing the services; the design approach and organization necessary to complete the services; and outline quality control measures to ensure delivery of a quality product on time, within budget that provides a cost efficient, timely and predictable execution of work.
4. Project Management, Schedule, and Quality Control (15 points)
Proposed project schedule and milestone management, approach to consultant coordination and communication, quality control and quality assurance procedures, ability to manage scope, budget, and schedule, and responsiveness to City review and approval processes.
XV. ATTACHMENTS
1. Project Location Map
2. Legal and Plat / Project’s Boundary
3. Non-Collusion Affidavit
4. Boiler-Plate Agreement for Professional Consultant Services
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Attachment A
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
Attachment B
LEGAL AND PLAT / PROJECT’S BOUNDARY
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Services
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026
RFP for Professional A&E Consultant Servic
es
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus – Project No. 803 0072 January 2026 Attachment C
Non-Collusion Affidavit
Note: To be executed by Proposer and submitted with proposal.
State of
(the State of the place of business)
County of
(the County of the place of business)
, being first duly sworn, deposes and
(name of the person signing this form)
says that he/she is of
(title of the person signing this form)
, the party making the foregoing bid
(name of bidding company)
that such bid is not made in the interest of or on the behalf of any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation; that such bid is genuine and not collusive or sham; that said bidder has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any bidder or anyone else to put in a sham bid, or that anyone shall refrain from bidding; that said bidder has not in any manner directly or indirectly sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price of said bidder or of any other bidder or to fix any overhead profit, or cost element of such bid price, or of that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract of anyone interested in the proposed contract; that all statements contained in such bid are true, and further, that said bidder has not directly or indirectly submitted his bid price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid and will not pay any fee in connection therewith, to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof, or to any other individual except to any person or persons as have a partnership or other financial interest with said bidder in the general business.
By:
( signature)
Printed Name:
(name of the person signing this form)
Title:
(title of the person signing this form)
Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
EXHI
BIT B
CON
SULTANT PROPOSAL
Moreno Valley
Public Safety Campus
PROPOSAL
FEBRUARY 16, 2026
Revised 2/24/26
EXHIBIT B
Vincent Mudd, GC
Managing Partner
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1150
San Diego, CA 92101
O 619 728 9382
E [email protected]
CONTACT
50 West San Fernando #850
San Jose, CA 95113
PMB #5041
2301 Blake Street #100
Denver, CO 80205
98 Battery Street #300
San Francisco CA 94111
90 Broad Street #1803
New Y ork NY 10004
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1150
San Diego, CA 92101
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1150
San Diego, CA 92101
805 Brazos Street
Austin TX 78701
February 16, 2026
Capital Projects Division
[email protected]
(951) 413-3130
Re: Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus, Project No. 803 0072 Dear Selection Committee,
Steinberg Hart is pleased to submit our qualifications for the Moreno Valley Joint-Use Public Safety Facility. This project closely aligns with our longstanding commitment to civic work and three decades of experience delivering public safety and campus-scale facilities. Our proposed team brings the technical expertise, regional insight, and leadership needed to realize the City’s vision. Personally, I am honored to bring this team to a City that has meant so much to me.
I first came to MoVal when my father was stationed at March Air Force Base prior to the City’s incorporation, when Sunnymead, Edgemont, and Moreno were the primary communities in the area. I was fortunate to receive my education and formative life experiences here, graduating from Moreno Valley High School in 1981. Over the past four decades, I have witnessed the city’s transformative economic growth, expanding industries, and increasing civic complexity. Moreno Valley deserves a resilient, adaptable Public Safety Campus that reflects the scale and responsibility of its mission. As Managing Partner of Steinberg Hart, I am fortunate to be in a position to assemble a team with the experience, insight, and leadership necessary to plan and deliver such a facility.
DEMONSTRATED EXPERIENCE IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Steinberg Hart brings more than 30 years of experience working throughout Riverside County, with over 30 completed projects for public-sector clients. We understand the civic identity, approval processes, and agency expectations that define successful project delivery in this region. That familiarity allows us to anticipate challenges, coordinate efficiently with authorities having jurisdiction, and maintain momentum from planning through construction and occupancy.
PROVEN LEADERSHIP IN MISSION-CRITICAL PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUSES Our public safety campus portfolio is extensive and distinctive. We are not solely police or fire station designers — we plan, phase, and deliver 24/7 mission-critical campuses that support complex operations today, while allowing for future growth.
Our work includes joint-use and multi-agency facilities, county operations campuses, emergency response infrastructure, and highly secure federal installations. We are proud to partner with Roth Sheppard Architects as our Public Safety Architect. Guided by their six principles of public safety design, Roth Sheppard has delivered complex joint-use facilities and emergency operations centers nationwide, earning a national reputation for technical depth and operational insight.
T ogether, we bring the focused expertise required to deliver a joint-use Police and Fire campus that performs seamlessly from day one and evolves to meet future demands.
DELIVERING IMPLEMENTABLE AND BUILDABLE CAMPUS SOLUTIONS Our team includes award-winning planners and architects with decades of experience translating complex operational requirements into clear, implementable, and buildable campus plans. Steinberg Hart is recognized for forging consensus among diverse stakeholder groups and delivering plans that move confidently from vision to execution.
We would be honored to partner with the City of Moreno Valley on this important project. It’s not often that you have an opportunity to come back to your hometown and do something meaningful. I am confident in our proposed team, our experience and abilities, and our dedication to delivering on our shared goals, and I know we will deliver a Public Safety Campus that the Moreno Valley of today and tomorrow will be proud of.
Respectfully,
Vincent Mudd, GC
Managing Partner
619 728 9382 / [email protected]
T o view a specific section, click
on the section name.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A
Project
Understanding
B
Design Approach and
Management Plan
C
Qualifications and
Experience
G
Additional Relevant
Information
H
Required Statements
I
Appendix
- Resumes
- Firm Certifications
D & E
Staffing Plan &
Work Plan and Schedule
F
Quality Control and
Assurance
06 | X
Section Title
- Section Subtitle List
- Section Subtitle List
07 | X
Section Title
- Section Subtitle List
- Section Subtitle List
08 | X
Section Title
- Section Subtitle List
- Section Subtitle List
09 | X
Section Title
- Section Subtitle List
- Section Subtitle List
10 | X
Section Title
- Section Subtitle List
- Section Subtitle List
A
PROJECT
UNDERSTANDING
Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Facility | Steinberg Hart 1 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
The Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus
project is a complex and highly technical
public safety facility designed to unify fire
and police services on a shared site while
supporting 24/7 critical operations.
NOT A SINGLE-BUILDING SOLUTION, A
LONG-TERM PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS
The Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus is best
understood not as the delivery of a single facility. but rather as a long-term civic and operational asset. The City has intentionally paired campus master planning, detailed space programming, and full architectural design of a joint- use Police and Fire facility within one scope. That structure recognizes a critical truth we have seen repeatedly on
municipal projects of this scale: early planning decisions determine whether a campus remains flexible and effective over decades, or becomes constrained by its first phase of development.
At approximately 14.7 acres, the site provides a rare
opportunity to establish a clear, resilient framework that supports immediate Police and Fire needs while preserving adaptability for future public safety or emergency-
response functions as City needs evolve.
UNDERSTANDING THE WHY BEFORE THE HOW
Understanding of the Nature of Work
MASTER PLANNING AS THE FOUNDATION FOR
OPERATIONAL SUCCESS
The most consequential work on this Project occurs before the architectural form is finalized. The campus master
plan must resolve building placement, circulation, access control, and infrastructure in a way that supports:
• 24/7 emergency operations
• Clear separation of public, staff, and secure zones
• Efficient emergency vehicle access, staging, and
maneuvering
• Logical expansion areas that can be phased without
disrupting active operations
From our experience delivering complex public safety
campuses, a well-designed initial facility can still fail operationally if the surrounding site strategy is not
equally rigorous. Our approach treats the master plan as a decision-making framework, not a diagram, establishing access hierarchies, utility strategies, and expansion zones that protect the integrity of the campus over time.
PROGRAMMING THAT REFLECTS HOW PUBLIC
SAFETY ACTUALLY OPERATES
Public safety facilities function differently than
conventional civic buildings. They are continuous-use
environments where operational efficiency, clarity of
movement, and secure adjacencies directly affect response times, staff wellbeing, and long-term performance.
Our programming process is grounded in a practical
understanding of how Police and Fire personnel work day- to-day and during critical incidents. We focus on:
• Functional adjacencies that reduce unnecessary travel and friction
• Circulation patterns that support fast response without compromising security
• Right-sized shared spaces that encourage collaboration while maintaining operational separation
• Clear zoning between public-facing, controlled, and
secure areas
This results in facilities that feel intuitive to use, reduce operational stress, and perform reliably under both routine and high-pressure conditions.
2 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE TIMELINE RISK (IID
PRIMARY EXTENSION)
ISSUE: Preliminary research indicates primary electrical service exists along Cactus Avenue. However, IID
extensions under CPUC Rule 15/16 can require extended
lead times, potentially exceeding one year depending on load requirements and area development.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC RISK: Utility planning delays could
jeopardize the City’s aggressive funding and design
milestones, particularly if power demand, generator
interconnection, or PV planning are not coordinated early.
OUR STRATEGY
• Initiate formal coordination with IID immediately upon award
• Confirm available primary capacity and extension
requirements during Programming
• Evaluate phased energization strategies if needed
• Design two separate metered services for Police and
Fire to provide operational and funding flexibility
• Provide bypass gear at each standby generator to allow temporary generator connection during maintenance or
failure
Early infrastructure coordination will reduce schedule
exposure and preserve redundancy.
ESSENTIAL SERVICES PERFORMANCE BEYOND
CODE MINIMUMS
ISSUE: The entire facility will be designed as an Essential Services Building. While the California Building Code
ensures life safety, it does not guarantee post-disaster operability following a major seismic event. For a public safety campus expected to function immediately after a
regional emergency, code compliance alone may not align with operational expectations.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC RISK: If performance expectations are not defined during Master Planning and Programming,
structural and systems decisions made later may limit the City’s ability to achieve post-disaster operability without costly redesign.
OUR STRATEGY
We will initiate early discussions with the City to define a desired seismic performance target, such as immediate
occupancy or post-disaster operability. During Master
Planning and Schematic Design, KPFF will evaluate:
• Enhanced seismic force design criteria
• Performance-based design alternatives
• Feasibility of seismic isolation or damping technologies This conversation will occur before structural systems are locked in, ensuring resilience goals are intentional rather than reactive.
POTENTIAL ISSUES AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELLNESS AS CORE
DESIGN DRIVERS
A defining issue in contemporary public safety facility design is long-term staff health, safety, and retention.
This is especially pronounced in fire station environments, where there is increased focus on limiting exposure to
contaminants, managing transitional zones, and ensuring that toxins do not migrate into clean or living areas. Our team applies these principles through:
• Deliberate zoning strategies that separate high-risk and clean areas
• Decontamination and transition spaces that protect
staff and facilities
• Planning decisions that support recovery, mental
wellbeing, and long-term occupational health
While these strategies are well-established in fire station planning, the underlying wellness-based approach applies directly to Police facilities as well. Law enforcement
personnel face comparable impacts from shift work,
operational stress, and exposure risks. Designing for
staff wellbeing is not an amenity. It is an operational requirement.
ONE CONTINUOUS VISION FROM CAMPUS TO
BUILDING
The City’s schedule places early emphasis on completing the space program, conceptual design, and cost validation to support City Council decision-making. That milestone requires a team capable of making informed, disciplined decisions early, with a clear understanding of which
elements must be fixed and which should remain flexible.
Our approach ensures that:
• The campus master plan anticipates future growth
without presupposing specific programs
• The space program reflects realistic operational needs rather than abstract benchmarks
• The joint-use Police and Fire facility is fully integrated into the campus framework
• Early design decisions support long-term adaptability, cost control, and operational continuity
The result is not simply a well-designed facility, but a cohesive, future-ready public safety campus that serves Moreno Valley’s immediate needs while preserving options for the decades ahead.
3 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
FUTURE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION
INFRASTRUCTURE
ISSUE: Public safety facilities depend heavily on radio, dispatch, fiber, and data infrastructure. Early assumptions about telecom providers, Motorola R56 grounding
requirements, and console vendors can significantly affect building configuration and electrical/mechanical loads.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC RISK: Late coordination with telecom
providers, Motorola, or console vendors can result in
redesign of equipment rooms, grounding systems, or
cooling strategies.
OUR STRATEGY
• Confirm City fiber strategy during Programming,
including leased fiber and secure networks
• Engage Motorola early to coordinate R56 grounding
requirements
• Validate console quantities and configurations with
vendor
• Design the Police data center with scalable cooling and fire suppression strategies
• Provide future PV and battery storage taps to support evolving resiliency goals
T echnology infrastructure will be treated as a primary design driver, not an afterthought.
CAMPUS PHASING AND FUTURE EXPANSION
WITHOUT OPERATIONAL DISRUPTION
ISSUE: The 14.7-acre site provides significant capacity relative to the initial joint-use facility. Without a disciplined expansion framework, future growth could compromise
circulation, security, or response efficiency.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC RISK: Future additions that
disrupt secure perimeters, response paths, or shared
infrastructure could reduce long-term campus
performance.
OUR STRATEGY
• Establish logical expansion zones during Master
Planning
• Separate public and secure circulation spines
• Size utilities and site infrastructure to accommodate future loads
• Preserve clear emergency response corridors
independent of future building zones
The campus will function cohesively on day one and remain adaptable without reconfiguration.
REDUNDANCY AND MISSION CONTINUITY FOR A
JOINT-USE FACILITY
ISSUE: A shared Police and Fire facility creates efficiencies, but it also increases dependency. Shared systems
without appropriate redundancy could compromise both
departments simultaneously during failure events.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC RISK: Single points of failure in power, data, or generator systems would undermine operational
resilience.
OUR STRATEGY
• Provide two separate standby generators, one
dedicated to each department
• Size fuel tanks for 96-hour runtime per NFPA 110, with final duration confirmed during Programming
• Design independent metered electrical and gas services • Evaluate shared versus separated fuel storage
strategies
• Provide A+B and N+1 redundancy for Police data center UPS systems
The campus will operate as a coordinated environment
without sacrificing departmental autonomy or resilience.
Public Safety and Allied Health Building
B
DESIGN APPROACH &
MANAGEMENT PLAN
Lenexa Justice Center | Roth Sheppard Architects
4 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
Ohio Street Probation Facility
WORKING WITH YOU
The Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus requires early alignment, disciplined decision- making, and sustained coordination across Police, Fire, and City leadership. Our approach is intentionally structured to support the City’s near-term requirement to complete programming, conceptual design, and cost validation by July 2026, while ensuring those early decisions do not limit long-term campus flexibility or operational effectiveness.
DESIGN APPROACH
From day one, Steinberg Hart establishes a regular,
predictable feedback loop with City staff and Police
and Fire leadership to surface issues early, validate
assumptions, and confirm priorities before decisions
become difficult or costly to reverse. This approach reflects our understanding that early planning choices, particularly related to campus organization, access, and adjacencies, carry long-term operational consequences
CAMPUS PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING AS THE
FOUNDATION FOR DESIGN
Our design approach begins at the campus scale,
establishing an overall framework for access, security, circulation, and future expansion before architectural form is developed. This ensures that the initial Police and Fire facility is positioned within a coherent long-term campus strategy rather than driving decisions that limit future flexibility.
During early planning and programming, we work with City staff and Police and Fire leadership to identify and test key campus considerations, including:
• Public, staff, and secure access hierarchies
• Emergency vehicle access, staging, and maneuvering
• Infrastructure strategies that support phased
development
• Potential expansion zones and long-term site
organization
These concepts are intentionally evaluated in parallel with space programming, allowing operational requirements
to refine and validate the campus framework. Once
programming is complete, campus strategies and
adjacencies are confirmed and carried forward into
schematic design as a stable basis for architectural
development.
PROGRAMMING FOCUSED ON OPERATIONAL
ALIGNMENT AND EARLY DECISIONS
The purpose of programming on this Project is not simply to document space needs, but to align Police, Fire, and City leadership around a shared understanding of operational priorities early in the process. Given the City’s schedule, programming must support timely decisions that can
be carried forward with confidence into design and cost validation.
Programming efforts are structured to be efficient and
decision-oriented. Rather than extended workshops or
open-ended studies, sessions are focused on confirming
key operational relationships, circulation expectations, and shared-use boundaries that directly influence layout, security zoning, and building size. Key areas of emphasis include:
• Clarifying public, controlled, and secure operational zones
• Confirming adjacencies that support response
efficiency and supervision
• Defining shared spaces that provide value without
creating operational conflicts
• Establishing realistic growth assumptions aligned with the campus plan
Programming outcomes are documented in a clear,
decision-ready format, allowing the City to confirm scope and direction without revisiting foundational assumptions in later phases. This approach supports early cost
modeling and reduces the risk of late-stage redesign.
5 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
HEALTH, SAFETY, AND STAFF WELLNESS AS
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
On the Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus, staff health and safety are addressed as fundamental planning
considerations that directly influence zoning, circulation, and adjacency decisions. This is especially important in a joint Police and Fire facility, where differing exposure profiles and operational rhythms must be resolved spatially rather than managed informally over time.
During programming and early design, we assess how
personnel enter, circulate, and transition between
operational, support, and recovery spaces. We prioritize clear separation of high-exposure and clean areas, defined transition zones, and circulation strategies that minimize cross-contamination between Police, Fire, and shared-use functions. Our approach incorporates:
• Campus and building zoning strategies that limit
contaminant migration through deliberate adjacency
planning
• Purposeful placement of decontamination and
transition spaces along primary operational paths
• Layout decisions that support recovery, supervision,
and shift-change conditions without compromising
security or response readiness
By resolving these issues early, at the planning and
programming level rather than through later technical
fixes, we support long-term staff wellbeing, operational reliability, and retention across both Police and Fire
functions.
PROGRAMMING, ADJACENCIES, & SECURITY
Clear separation between public and secure zones within both the site and the facility is critical. Once the site is effectively organized, the project gains momentum
and design strategies become apparent. Our priority
as we compile quantitative and qualitative data on your departments is to thoughtfully organize the program
components in a way that both enhances operations and
provides natural separation between public and secure
circulation. This allows the facility to be a welcoming community asset while also providing a safe, efficient
workplace for building users.
Joint public safety facilities offer opportunities to find efficiencies in shared program spaces that can be utilized by both departments. Some examples of shared-use
spaces within public safety buildings are break rooms,
kitchens/kitchenettes, conference rooms, training
classrooms, and fitness centers. Depending on the City
of Moreno Valley’s goals, there are ample opportunities to create ‘hardworking’ spaces that accommodate
flexible uses by various users and departments.
SITE CIRCULATION & PARKING
Site circulation and parking is a critical component for police departments and its complexity is amplified when incorporating a police station in a joint facility such as the one proposed by the City of Moreno Valley. Secure
vehicular ingress and egress for officers is imperative and site design often requires nuanced discussions with stakeholders as to how the security of the site will be managed at a joint facility. We are adept at navigating these conversations regarding both security and
operational flow between the police and fire departments and finding consensus within proposed solutions.
Solving the site circulation is often a key first step.
Parking areas and/or structures are ideally customized
to complement the building design and enhance all
departments’ operations. We pay particular attention to the ways in which Moreno Valley PD and Moreno Valley
FD operations may conflict on site to ensure that the
design accommodates both departments to successfully
function individually and also together under one roof.
CARRYING EARLY DECISIONS THROUGH DESIGN
As the Project advances into schematic and design
development, our focus is on preserving the operational decisions established during campus planning and
programming. Building design is deliberately developed
around confirmed adjacencies, circulation paths, and
security zones to avoid re-opening foundational issues
once the Project is in motion.
Design reviews are structured to test proposed layouts
against operational scenarios, staffing patterns,
and emergency response needs, ensuring the
building continues to function as intended—not just
diagrammatically, but day-to-day. Particular attention is given to maintaining the integrity of joint-use boundaries and circulation strategies as technical systems and code requirements are integrated.
This approach allows design development to progress
efficiently while maintaining alignment with the City’s schedule, cost expectations, and long-term operational
goals.
ROTH SHEPPARD'S CONSIDERATIONS FOR PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAMMING AND DESIGN Fredrik Nilsson Leads a Design Review
6 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
MANAGEMENT APPROACH
TEAM STRUCTURE AND ROLES
Steinberg Hart serves as Prime Consultant and single
point of accountability for coordination, quality, and
delivery. Our team is structured to maintain continuity from campus master planning through architectural delivery,
avoiding hand-offs that dilute intent or introduce risk.
Roth Sheppard supports the Project with public safety
planning and operational validation, strengthening early decision-making and ensuring programming and layout
decisions are grounded in real-world operations. This
collaboration builds on prior working relationships and shared expectations for rigor and accountability.
CLEAR, PREDICTABLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Given the City’s critical early milestone, our management approach emphasizes clarity, discipline, and
responsiveness. Key management practices include:
• A detailed, milestone-driven project schedule aligned with City decision points
• Regular coordination meetings with documented
agendas, action items, and follow-up
• Early identification of schedule or scope risks with
proposed mitigation strategies
• Direct coordination across all subconsultants prior to City submittals
The work plan is used as an active management and
communication tool, not a static deliverable, ensuring
expectations remain aligned throughout the Project.
CONTINUOUS COORDINATION AND ISSUE
TRACKING
We implement structured issue-tracking tools such as MS Planner and Bluebeam to ensure decisions and feedback
are resolved efficiently and transparently. This includes:
• Action Item Logs to track City and stakeholder feedback • Clear ownership and response timelines for each item
• Resolution checkpoints tied to key milestones
This approach reduces the risk of unresolved issues
carrying forward and affecting later phases.
QUALITY CONTROL AND ASSURANCE PROGRAM
For over 70 years, Steinberg Hart has continually
strengthened its quality management program. Our QA/
QC framework serves as a core project management tool
to reinforce accountability, support schedule adherence, reduces risk, and create structured decision-making
checkpoints. Additional detail is provided in Section F:
Quality Control and Assurance.
Steinberg Hart staff QAQC documents
Steinberg Hart establishes clear lines of responsibility from the outset, with a designated single point of contact to streamline decision-making and maintain alignment.
As Project Manager for the Moreno Valley Public
Safety Campus, Jason Maune will be the City's Main
Point of Contact , as indicated on the Organization Chart on the following page.
Weekly check-ins with our extended design team provide
a structured forum to coordinate workflow, remove
roadblocks, and maintain schedule commitments. These
meetings are agenda-driven, with materials distributed
in advance to encourage informed, solution-oriented
dialogue.
We emphasize proactive problem solving. T eam
members are expected to come prepared, fostering
productive conversations focused on resolving issues
rather than identifying them. This disciplined approach supports efficiency, responsiveness, and momentum
throughout all phases of the project.
We will maintain open lines of communication with the
City through regular updates, accessible leadership, and clearly defined channels for feedback. Our commitment
to continual improvement ensures that lessons learned
and stakeholder input are integrated into ongoing work, strengthening collaboration and reducing risk.
COMMUNICATION PLAN
CLARITY EFFICIENCY COLLABORATION RESPONSIVENESS
7 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
ORGANIZATION CHART
MEP ENGINEERING
ELEN Consulting
CIVIL ENGINEERING &
LAND SURVEYOR
PSOMAS
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
PSOMAS
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
KPFF Consulting Engineers
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Schmidt Design Group
FIRE PROTECTION
ENGINEERING
Coffman Engineers
SECURITY / LOW-VOLTAGE
NV5
COST ESTIMATOR
Cumming Group
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
Geocon
MAIN POINT OF CONTACT
JASON MAUNE
Project Manager
PROJECT OVERSIGHT
VINCENT MUDD
Project Director
CONSULTANT TEAM
Below are the key staff members and consultants proposed for the Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus. The team has been carefully vetted for relevant experience on comparable project types and for overall competitiveness.
Steinberg Hart’s key team members bring both individual and firm-wide experience collaborating on complex civic projects, while the proposed consultant team offers demonstrated expertise delivering public safety facilities in Riverside County and throughout Southern California. Resumes for our consultant team have been provided in the Appendix.
KATEE CHARD
Project Architect
JANENE
CHRISTOPHER
QAQC Director
DANIEL STEWART
Lead Planner
PUBLIC SAFETY
ARCHITECT
BRIAN BERRYHILL
Roth Sheppard Architects
PUBLIC SAFETY
ARCHITECT
TYLER JOSEPH
Roth Sheppard Architects
FREDRIK NILSSON
Design Director
C
QUALIFICATIONS
AND EXPERIENCE
Firestone Police Department & Municipal Court | Roth Sheppard Architects 8 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
BRANDON NASH | PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Brandon is an accomplished architect with significant
experience planning, designing, and delivering secure
environments for federal, defense, and mission-critical clients, including five Emergency Operations Centers
for the Navy. Across his career, he has contributed to
long-range campus planning, secure facility upgrades, and high-security design integration.
JASON MAUNE | PROJECT MANAGER
Jason has a proven record of delivering complex public
facilities for Steinberg Hart’s civic partners. His meticulous attention to detail and skill in balancing diverse stakeholder priorities have made him a trusted collaborator among
our repeat clients at the County of San Diego. In depth qualifications for Jason are provided on page 16.
FREDRIK NILSSON | DESIGN DIRECTOR
Fredrik is an award-winning Design Director who grounds each project in early research and a clear understanding of context and program, establishing a strong conceptual framework from inception through execution. His
prior collaboration with Roth Sheppard on the LAPD
Headquarters ensures seamless coordination and
integrated design leadership for the Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus.
KATEE CHARD | PROJECT ARCHITECT
Katee is a licensed California architect with deep
experience delivering civic facilities that must perform reliably and securely. She will help guide Moreno Valley’s Police and Fire operational planning into efficient layouts, coordinated documentation, and resilient design decisions that support 24/7 readiness and future expansion.
DANIEL STEWART | LEAD PLANNER
Dan has dedicated his career to master planning civic
campuses that are both flexible and implementable.
Notable examples include the award- winning San Diego
County Operations Center Campus and the Navy SEALs
Coastal Campus in Coronado. These two transformative,
multi-phase plans demonstrate his ability to align
stakeholders, optimize land use, and create enduring civic infrastructure.
JANENE CHRISTOPHER | QUALITY ASSURANCE
As QAQC Director, Janene is responsible for shaping
firmwide QAQC frameworks, refining start -up procedures, and ensuring that both architectural and consultant teams adhere to disciplined technical and coordination processes.
Her experience on more than 30 fire stations directly
informs and strengthens her QA/QC approach for this
project.
Steinberg Hart brings decades of experience delivering
public safety, mission critical, and civic facilities for municipal, county, state, and federal clients. Our portfolio includes police headquarters, fire stations, emergency
operations centers (EOCs), justice environments, and
secure civic buildings.
In addition to designing award-winning architecture,
Steinberg Hart’s team of planners are adept at creating implementable master plans for campuses that evolve over time and respond to changing environments and priorities.
This combined strength positions our team to deliver a
high-performing joint-use Public Safety facility today while establishing a clear, flexible framework for future facility and service expansion as community needs evolve.
PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
Steinberg Hart brings over 35 years of experience
designing essential service and public safety infrastructure for federal, state, and local government agencies. With a portfolio of over 1,000 publicly owned buildings totaling more than $3 billion in construction value, we understand the complexity, urgency, and precision that public safety facilities demand. A comprehensive look at our Public
Safety experience is provided on the following page.
REGIONAL EXPERIENCE
Steinberg Hart has been working within Riverside
County for over 30 years. Prominent projects includes
the Riverside Courthouse Historic Renovation, a 20-year working relationship with Riverside Community College
District, and a ten-year relationship with the University of California, Riverside.
This deep local and regional experience means our team
not only understands the development patterns, permitting pathways, and technical expectations of Riverside County agencies, but also maintains long-standing working
relationships with decision-makers, reviewers, and
stakeholders. These connections enable us to anticipate agency needs, streamline approvals, and proactively
resolve issues before they affect project momentum.
KEY TEAM MEMBER QUALIFICATIONS
VINCENT MUDD | PROJECT DIRECTOR
Vincent brings strong executive leadership and deep
regional familiarity to the project. As a former resident and graduate of Moreno Valley High School (go Vikings!), he provides valuable local insight that will support effective coordination with City stakeholders and reinforce the
project’s community -centered approach.
FIRM QUALIFICATIONS
Please consider this page and the following pages as Steinberg Hart's response to Statement E of the Required Statements 9 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
Photo Caption - Project Name & Location Here
STEINBERG HART FIRMWIDE PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
TRUST & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Our 20-year partnership with the County of San Diego
and leadership on projects like the Southeastern Live Well Center (SELWC) and the County Operations Center reflect our deep understanding of public service, and our ability to create civic buildings that foster trust and accessibility.
These projects emphasize community-centered design
for critical facilities that must be welcoming, safe, and responsive to the diverse populations they serve.
POLICE & FIRE DEPARTMENT EXPERTISE
We have delivered more than 30 fire stations and multiple police facilities that support the unique operational
requirements of emergency responders. From durable,
low-maintenance materials to efficient apparatus bays,
dormitories, and secure public interfaces, our design
solutions enhance response readiness, inter-agency
coordination, and long-term facility performance.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTERS
Our work on the San Diego County Operations Center
and the $1 billion Naval Base Coronado Coastal Campus
demonstrates our ability to deliver complex, mission-
critical Emergency Operations Centers (EOCs). These
facilities incorporate secure infrastructure, redundant systems, and integrated campus-wide communications
that support real-time decision-making and continuity of operations during disasters and emergencies.
CRITICAL COMMUNICATIONS
We have extensive experience designing secure,
technology-rich spaces that protect critical
communications, including Emergency Operations Centers, Police and Fire Emergency Communications, Secure Data
centers, and 911 Call Centers.
Steinberg Hart’s holistic approach to Public Safety design ensures that each facility we deliver is resilient, secure, adaptable, and deeply rooted in the community it serves. Our proven performance in each of these core areas makes us a trusted partner in delivering a Public Safety Facility for Moreno Valley now, and a plan for expanded facilities to serve the City in the future.
PUBLIC SAFETY AND ALLIED HEALTH BUILDING FACILITY Yucaipa, CA The Public Safety & Allied Health Building brings together fire, emergency medical, and respiratory care training programs into a single, purpose-built facility designed to simulate real-world emergency scenarios and support cross-disciplinary collaboration. This integrated training environment reflects the operational synergies required of modern public safety agencies, making it directly relevant to the planning and design of Public Safety Headquarters.
LOS ANGELES FIRE STATION #43 Los Angeles, CA
Steinberg Hart delivered the 100% design for the new two-story, 15,000 SF Fire Station No. 43 in Los Angeles, coordinating with LAFD, Public Works, LABOE, and LADBS. The compact facility supports full emergency operations with administrative, living, and apparatus functions, and integrates comprehensive building systems, including MEP , fire-life-safety, communications and emergency power, for a fully resilient essential service station.
POLICE SERVICES & FIRE ADMIN FACILITY City of Mountain View, CA Steinberg Hart modernized a shared Police and Fire Administration facility to support three distinct user groups: the public-facing city departments, the police department, and the fire departments within a single building. The programming and design resolved complex spatial and security requirements with a reimagined public lobby that balances openness with controlled access. The updated facility enhances operational efficiency while integrating sustainable strategies.
10 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
SHERIFF TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION
CENTER (STIC)
SAN DIEGO, CA | 47 ,000 SF
The Sheriff’s T echnology and Information Center (STIC) is a purpose-built, essential services facility designed to support the critical public safety and emergency
communication needs of the County of San Diego. The
facility consolidates administrative offices, operations areas, and warehouse functions. This mission-critical Risk Category IV structure is designed with base isolation,
N+1 redundancy, and resilient systems to serve as the
operational backbone of the emergency communications
systems. A 125-foot-tall wireless communications tower
extends this network’s reach countywide, enhancing both daily law enforcement functions and emergency response
capabilities.
NAWS CHINA LAKE FIRE STATION
RIDGECREST, CA | 20,800 SF
The Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) Station at NAWS China Lake is a 20,799 SF essential public safety
facility purpose-built to support advanced firefighting and emergency operations on an active military airfield.
Designed for the Navy’s specialized firefighting units, the station supports rapid deployment, 24/7 readiness,
and firefighter wellness in high-stakes environments. At the core of the facility is a 7-bay Apparatus Bay designed to accommodate large-scale emergency vehicles. Support
areas directly connected to the bay include hazardous
materials storage, EMT , SCUBA, fire extinguisher
maintenance, and dedicated spaces for personal protective equipment (PP&E) storage, decontamination, and laundry.
Photo Caption - Project Name & Location Here
REFERENCE
Juan Arriaga
Vice President
Lowe Enterprises
T (858) 565-7287
E [email protected]
TEAM MEMBERS
Janene Christopher
Brandon Nash
Daniel Stewart
REFERENCE
Rick Montoya, RA
US Navy
T (619) 705-4839
E ricardo.e.montoya3.civ
@us.navy.mil
TEAM MEMBERS
Brandon Nash
Janene Christopher
STEINBERG HART TEAM EXPERIENCE
11 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
NAVY SEAL ESSENTIAL OPERATIONS
AND TRAINING CAMPUS
CORONADO, CA | 1,500,000 SF NEW CONSTRUCTION
PUBLIC HEALTH LAB
SAN DIEGO, CA | 53,500 SF
The Coastal Campus is an essential, high-security
operations and training campus designed to support
national security at the highest level. This state-of-the- art installation integrates high-security administrative, operational, and logistics within a resilient and
interconnected campus. Key facilities include a secure
armory, command and logistics centers, emergency
operation centers, and specialized training environments, such as the Indoor Dynamic Shooting Ranges, a close-
quarters combat facility , helicopter training, and a dive training facility. While specific to the SEALs’ mission, these facilities reflect the spatial, security, and resiliency needs of law enforcement and emergency response teams
operating in complex urban and coastal contexts like the Port of San Diego.
The Public Health Lab is a new two-story facility delivered following Steinberg Hart’s comprehensive space utilization study of the County of San Diego’s COC Campus. After
evaluating hybrid work patterns and planning for 10%
future growth, we identified a consolidation strategy
that created the capacity to relocate health services and emergency response functions onto the campus. The
new Public Health Center includes secured laboratory
environments on both levels, including BSL-3 labs, along with integrated administrative support spaces. The
LEED Platinum lab is built to essential services facility standards and plays a critical role in protecting the
health of all San Diegans by monitoring, detecting and
responding to public health concerns.
REFERENCE
Chris Goulet, PE,
Design Manager
T (619) 705-4715
E christopher.w.goulet2.
[email protected]
TEAM MEMBERS
Jason Maune
Brandon Nash
Daniel Stewart
Janene Christopher
REFERENCE
Marko Medved
Director, Department of
General Services
County of San Diego
T (858) 694-2338
E marko.medved@
sdcounty.ca.gov
TEAM MEMBERS
Jason Maune
Brandon Nash
Daniel Stewart
Janene Christopher
Vincent Mudd
12 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
A TEAM STRUCTURED FOR CAMPUS-SCALE
PUBLIC SAFETY PROJECTS
ROTH SHEPPARD'S UNIQUE APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY SPACE PLANNING Roth Sheppard's design philosophy is to first ‘define the problem’ prior to solving it. Joint public safety facilities are inherently complex and achieving a design that will both accommodate current operations and allow for future flexibility and growth is a nuanced effort. They understand that every agency is unique. Their goal in working with you is to ask questions that will help uncover architectural solutions that are specific to your city, your police department, and your fire department.
SIX PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC SAFETY DESIGN
Roth Sheppard has developed the Six Principles of Public Safety Design, which serve as guiding tenets for important design elements in successful public safety projects, including the specific use case of a joint police and fire building. These are not one-size-fits-all design solutions. Rather, they are used as a point-of-departure to inform questions and guide discussions during the master planning and programming phase.
WHY ROTH SHEPPARD
This Project requires a team that can move seamlessly
from campus master planning, to detailed programming,
to full architectural delivery, without losing continuity or intent. We are partnered with Roth Sheppard to support
the planning and operational validation of the joint-use Police and Fire facility. This collaboration strengthens the Project by integrating architectural design with
deep operational understanding, ensuring that planning
decisions are grounded in how facilities are actually used.
Our Designer Director, Fredrik Nilsson, previously
collaborated with Roth Sheppard on the LAPD
Administrative Building, providing an established working relationship and shared understanding of how planning
rigor translates into built performance.
60+
Public Safety
Design Awards
100+
American Institute of
Architecture (AIA)
Design Awards
17 AIA Justice Facilities
Design Awards
120+
Public Safety Projects
Across America and
Canada
ROTH SHEPPARD RECOGNITION
REFUGE
Creating a safe and secure site and facility.
COMMUNITY
Fostering relationships and building trust.
LONGEVITY
Ensuring durability and future-readiness.
WELLNESS
Promoting well-being and effective training.
BEACON OF SAFETY
Conveying pride and civic presence.
CONFLUENCE
Enhancing communication & info-sharing.
13 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
FOSSIL RIDGE PUBLIC SAFETY
BUILDING
THORNTON, CO | 36,000 SF
The City of Thornton required adherence to a tight budget and an accelerated schedule to accommodate their
growing community and public safety needs. The Roth
Sheppard team was brought on to provide programming
and design services to bring Fire Station #6 and a Police Substation to an expanding area of the City. Our site
analysis and space needs assessment included multiple
rounds of building user interviews, which increasingly
focused on the wellbeing of Thornton first responders. For the fire department, demarcation of a separation of the operations area and the sanctuary of the living quarters was crucial. For the police, focus on the secure line and creating a place of refuge for officers was highest priority.
REFERENCE
Greg Reeves
Deputy Chief
T (720) 977 - 5008
E Greg.Reeves@
cityofthornton.net
TEAM MEMBERS
Brian Berryhill
T yler Joseph
ROTH SHEPPARD TEAM EXPERIENCE
LEWISVILLE PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS
LEWISVILLE, TX | 16 ACRES
Roth Sheppard Architects partnered with BRW
Architects for program verification, planning, and design services for the City of Lewisville's Tittle McFadden
Public Safety Center. The new complex replaces the
outdated and undersized facilities of Lewisville’s Police and Fire departments. The police component includes
administration, 911 dispatch, investigations, patrol, traffic, case clerks, and property and evidence. The new facilities are served by a secure, five-level parking garage designed to enhance daily operations of both departments.
REFERENCE
William Wawro
Assistant Chief
Lewisville Police
Department
T (972) 219 - 3612
E wwawro@
cityoflewisville.com
TEAM MEMBERS
Brian Berryhill
T yler Joseph
14 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
JASON MAUNE AIA, FITWEL
Project Manager | License CA C35053
QUALIFICATIONS
Jason is a highly versatile architect with expertise in planning, design, and delivery. He has a strong command of site development economics, understands how design
decisions impact construction cost and schedule, and
excels at assembling and directing high-performing
consultant teams. Over his seven year tenure at Steinberg Hart, Jason has taken charge of many of Steinberg Hart's most complex projects. His ability to align stakeholders, coordinate consultant disciplines and deliverables, and clearly communicate objectives has established him as a trusted leader among his colleagues.
TRACK RECORD
Jason has a proven track record of delivering highly
complex projects on time and under budget. Most notably, he played a central role in the successful delivery of the Public Health Lab, coordinating a 23-consultant team
and working closely with the County, Contractor, and
Developer to manage scope changes, approvals, and
modifications without schedule or cost impacts. Recently, Jason completed a complex entitlement effort with the
City of Escondido, navigating an extensive plan review
and approval process that required meticulous consultant coordination and ultimately achieved unanimous City
approval.
Currently Jason is managing a high-profile site conversion, a previously developed outdoor mall and theater site
into a something that is of higher and better use for the community. It is a highly technical project and requires the coordination of 30 disciplines.
PROJECT MANAGER QUALIFICATIONS
CITY OF LOS ANGELES Los Angeles, CA
LAFD #43 West La 15,000 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
San Diego Public Health Lab 53,500 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
COC Utilization Study
NAVAL BASE CORONADO Coronado, CA
Coronado Coastal Campus 1,500,000 SF
SELECT RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
“
I worked directly with Jason Maune on a day -to-day
basis for more than two years while he served as
Project Manager for the County of San Diego Public
Health Laboratory project. Throughout this time,
Jason consistently demonstrated exceptional
leadership, organization, and accountability on one
of the County’s most complex and highly regulated
facilities. He was deeply engaged in all aspects of
the project and earned the trust of both Lowe and
County leadership through his responsiveness,
reliability, and follow -through. Jason’s ability to
proactively identify issues, communicate clearly,
and drive effective solutions was instrumental to the
project’s overall success.
– Erik Flores, Vice President
LOWE Enterprises
REFERENCE
Erik Flores
Vice President
LOWE
t. (858) 766-0226
e. [email protected]
Public Safety and Allied Health Building | Steinberg Hart D & E
STAFFING PLAN &
WORKPLAN AND
SCHEDULE
KEY TEAM
MEMBER ROLE CURRENT
WORKLOAD
CURRENT %
ALLOCATED
ANTICIPATED
WORKLOAD
FORECAST %
ALLOCATION
Vincent Mudd Project Director
Benton Harbor Master Plan
UTC 400-unit Development
Combat T raining T ank
10%
25%
20%
Aventine Entitlement
CSUSM Modular T ower
County of SD EOC
15%
15%
5%
Brandon Nash Principal-in-Charge
Naval Base Pt. Loma Base
Operations Center
P491 Vehicle Maintenance Facility
10%
25%
LAX Fire Station
Port of SD Harbor Police
10%
10%
Jason Maune Project Manager
County of SD Public Health
Calabasas Shopping Center
Adaptive Reuse
Benton Harbor Master Plan
10%
25%
20%
Aventine Entitlement
CSUSM Modular T ower
County of SD EOC
10%
10%
10%
Katee Chard Project Architect Naval Base Pt. Loma Realignment City of San Diego -on call
10%
20%
Naval Base Pt. Loma
Realignment
City of San Diego - on call
10%
20%
Fredrik Nilsson Designer
531 College Redevelopment
Benton Harbor Master Plan
Bridge Oceanview
10%
25%
20%
County of SD EOC
LAX Fire Station
10%
15%
Daniel Stewart Lead Planner Ben Clark Modernization 10% Ben Clark Modernization 30% Janene Christopher QAQC Director
Naval Base Pt. Loma Ops
UCR - Academic Building
Cal Poy Slo Housing Campus
10%
10%
10%
LAX Fire Station
Port of SD Harbor Police
10%
10%
KEY TEAM MEMBER CURRENT AND ANTICIPATED WORKLOADS
15 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart Our proposed team is concentrated in
within an hour and a half of the project
site, and available to start on the project as
soon as the approval is given.
We have developed a staffing plan composed of
experienced professionals dedicated to the successful
delivery of this multi-phase project. Our approach
combines focused task leadership with strategic overlap among key team members to ensure continuity, efficiency, and institutional knowledge throughout all phases. As
reflected in our staffing matrix, each key team member has confirmed availability consistent with the project’s scope and schedule.
As Project Director, Vincent Mudd provides executive
oversight, team formation, contract negotiations, and
corporate resource alignment. He will lead management
efforts, guide CEQA coordination, support community
engagement, and shepherd entitlement and permitting,
dedicating approximately 5–15 hours per week.
Jason Maune serves as Project Manager from initiation
through closeout, overseeing consultants and Steinberg
Hart staff from Schematic Design through Construction.
T ogether, Vincent and Jason lead the entitlement strategy and overall project coordination.
STAFFING PLAN
Brandon Nash, P rincipal, will sign all Steinberg H art documents and provide consistent oversight from
feasibility throug h Construction Documents.
Fredrik Nilsson, Design Director, will lead campus
visioning and site
strategy for the 14.6-acre property,
collaborating closely with Roth She ppard on Police
and Fire programming, f easibility analysis, and master planning. Daniel Stewart will support this effort with his deep campus planning expertise, ensuring the overall site framework is scalable and operationally efficient. F redrik will guide concept
development for the joint-use facility
and overall campus identity. A the end of their 2.5 month effort, R oth Sheppard, w orking together with Fredrik, will confirm site layout and building massing to inform early cost modeling with
our cost estimator Cumming Group,
who can provide a first project ROM to the city.
Katee Chard , Project Architect, will translate programming outcomes into coordinated Revit-based documents
through LOD 200 and beyond, support ed by a dedicated
design team. Jane ne Christ opher will provide QA/QC
oversight from Schematic Design throug h Construction
Documents, and will remain available as need through
Construction Administration.
Additional staff resources from our San Diego and Los
Angeles offices e
nsure depth, re sponsiveness, and
continuity throughout the project lifecycle.
MILESTONE MANAGEMENT
Each phase concludes with a structured City review
meeting and written confirmation prior to advancing.
T wo-week review windows are incorporated at each
major submittal.
CONSULTANT COORDINATION
• Bi-weekly interdisciplinary coordination meetings
• Consolidated action-item tracking
• Pre-submittal internal alignment across all
disciplines
BUDGET & SCOPE CONTROL
• Continuous cost reconciliation at SD, DD, and CD
milestones
• Early identification of scope creep
• T ransparent change tracking
• Alignment with July 2026 funding milestone
RESPONSIVENESS TO CITY REVIEW
All comments are consolidated into a single response
matrix to eliminate fragmented feedback and protect
schedule continuity.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT & SCHEDULE CONTROL
Grounded in our expertise in schedule and cost management, this disciplined framework is embedded in every phase to ensure proactive oversight, fiscal responsibility, and clear milestone accountability from initiation through completion. The outline below is executed at each phase of the work plan. 16 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
COST MANAGEMENT
Our design and construction approach integrates best
practices to consistently help our public clients achieve their project goals within budget. Establishing robust
project controls early in the planning and visioning process is crucial for effective cost management. During this initial phase, our design team collaborates closely with project leadership and key stakeholders in a visioning session
to define measures for maintaining the project budget.
By setting clear objectives, budgets, and design decision protocols from the outset, we ensure better financial
oversight and alignment among all parties, leading to more successful project outcomes.
SCHEDULING
Our team employs a comprehensive approach to
project scheduling by beginning with the end goal in
mind and adopting a parallel delivery model rather than the traditional linear format. For complex projects, we anticipate future deliverables and proactively integrate early research into our scheduling model. We prioritize understanding public funding approvals, contracting
requirements, and procurement timelines to align project deliverables with the City’s budget cycles and funding
authorization schedule.
We initiate this process with Design Phase Pull-Planning, using this information to divide the global schedule into daily, weekly, and monthly tasks, with specific parties assigned to each task. Stakeholder reviews are integrated into each cycle. The schedule remains dynamic and is
continuously updated in real time, with all members having cloud-based access.
A critical element of our scheduling process is identifying a recovery plan for potential disruptions. This closed-loop system isolates scheduling breaks and ensures that a
recovery team is promptly introduced to keep the project on track without jeopardizing the original timeline.
COMPLETING SERVICES WITHIN BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
Public Safety and
Allied Health Building
17 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
DELIVERABLES
• Confirmed Project Management Plan
• Detailed baseline schedule
• Communication and review matrix
From the outset, we implement a structured cadence:
bi-weekly working sessions and formal milestone review
meetings utilizing consolidated comment logs and defined action tracking.
PHASE 2 | SITE EVALUATION & CAMPUS MASTER
PLANNING
Given the size of the site relative to initial building footprint, master planning decisions must anticipate operational
growth and future expansion.
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Site constraint analysis (utilities, grading, drainage, off- site access)
• Modeling of apparatus deployment and maneuvering
paths
• Separation of emergency response circulation from
public and staff access
• Validation of Police secure parking, sallyport
positioning, and controlled perimeter strategy
• Identification of future expansion zones and phased
growth areas
• Early coordination with civil, geotechnical, and
environmental consultants
Building placement will be tested against emergency
generator yard requirements, secure fencing strategy, and response sequencing to prevent cross-conflict between
Fire apparatus movement and Police secure circulation.
Environmental and entitlement coordination begins during this phase and continues in parallel throughout design to avoid downstream delay.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft and Final Campus Master Plan
• Operational circulation diagrams
• Site development strategy
CITY REVIEW
Formal City review meeting to confirm campus framework
prior to finalizing the space program.
APPROACH OVERVIEW
The Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus requires
disciplined planning, operational fluency, and structured execution. Steinberg Hart’s work plan integrates campus master planning, operational programming, environmental coordination, and phased cost control within a defined
milestone framework.
The result is a predictable path from April 2026 Notice to Proceed through December 2027 Design Completion—
supporting the City’s funding schedule and delivering
a resilient, expandable, and future-ready public safety campus.
Our schedule organizes work around:
• Defined phase deliverables
• Structured City review meetings
• Bi-weekly coordination check-ins
• Parallel environmental and entitlement coordination
• Continuous cost validation
This milestone-driven structure ensures the City has clear decision points before advancing to the next phase.
PHASE 1 | PROJECT INITIATION & ALIGNMENT
OBJECTIVES
• Confirm scope, schedule, governance, identify
stakeholders, and communication protocols
• Align Police and Fire operational goals
• Validate July 2026 deliverable requirements
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Kickoff meeting with City leadership, Police, Fire, and Public Works
• Confirmation of decision-making structure and review
process
• Detailed schedule validation aligned with RFP
milestones
• Establishment of bi-weekly working sessions, as well as weekly check-ins up until final delivery of Master Plan and Space Program
WORKPLAN & SCHEDULE
18 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart PHASE 4 | SCHEMATIC DESIGN (SD)
Schematic Design translates the approved campus and
program into operationally precise layouts.
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Refined site plan and building placement
• Secure zoning and controlled access concepts
• Floor plans validating response flow and adjacency
• Massing and elevation studies
• Conceptual stormwater management plan
• Preliminary structural and MEP system concepts
• Emergency power and backup system strategy
• Integrated security, access control, and surveillance framework
Security infrastructure will be embedded into the
architectural concept rather than applied as an overlay.
COST MANAGEMENT
30% Cost Estimate with reconciliation workshop.
DELIVERABLES
• Schematic Design Package
• Outline Specifications
• Updated Cost Estimate
CITY REVIEW
Formal City review meeting prior to advancing to Design Development.
PHASE 3 | SPACE PROGRAMMING
Programming will be conducted through facilitated
operational workshops with Police and Fire leadership to validate:
• 24/7 staffing models and shift overlap conditions
• Evidence intake and chain-of-custody flow
• Detainee transfer routes and secure holding adjacency • Apparatus bay configuration and support spaces
• Emergency communications, dispatch, and hardened
infrastructure needs
• Shared-use efficiencies between Police and Fire
Secure and non-secure zones will be diagrammed and
pressure-tested to eliminate circulation conflicts and
ensure public interface areas remain separated from
critical operational functions.
Programming and site planning advance concurrently to
ensure the building footprint and campus framework are
fully aligned.
DELIVERABLES
• Draft and Final Space Program
• Area tabulations
• Adjacency matrices
• Secure circulation diagrams
COST VALIDATION
A Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) cost estimate will be
prepared and reconciled prior to July 2026.
MILESTONE (JULY 2026)
• Final Campus Master Plan
• Approved Space Program
• ROM Cost Estimate
This package supports the City’s August 2026 Council
funding presentation.
Roth Sheppard Architects
Steinberg Hart milestone review
19 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart PHASE 6 | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (CD)
Construction Documents will be developed in coordinated, milestone-based progression.
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Complete architectural, civil, structural, and MEP
documentation
• T echnical specifications
• Interdisciplinary coordination prior to issuance
• Integration of plan check readiness reviews
• Final engineer’s construction cost estimate
MILESTONES
• 90% Construction Documents (internal milestone)
• 100% Construction Documents (permit-ready)
DELIVERABLES
• 100% Construction Documents
• 100% Specifications
• 100% Cost Estimate
PERMITTING, BIDDING & CONSTRUCTION PHASE
SERVICES
Although the schedule graphic concludes at design
completion, our services extend through construction and closeout.
PERMITTING
• Agency coordination and response to plan check
comments
• Permit tracking and issuance support
BIDDING
• Addenda preparation
• Bid analysis and recommendation to award
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
• Submittal and shop drawing review
• RFI response
• Site visits
• Change order evaluation
• Punch list and substantial completion support
CLOSEOUT
• Record drawings
• Commissioning coordination
• Staff training
• Warranty-period support
PHASE 5 | DESIGN DEVELOPMENT (DD)
Design Development advances the project to full system
coordination.
KEY ACTIVITIES
• Fully coordinated architectural, civil, structural, and MEP systems
• Site grading and drainage protection for apparatus
deployment
• Confirmation of generator capacity and critical load prioritization
• HVAC redundancy for critical rooms
• Seismic resilience and essential services compliance • Integrated low-voltage, radio, and security systems
coordination
Environmental review and entitlement documentation
continue in parallel to prevent late-stage redesign.
COST MANAGEMENT
60% Cost Estimate and reconciliation workshop.
DELIVERABLES
• Design Development Drawings
• Specifications
• System Narratives
• Updated Cost Estimate
CITY REVIEW
Milestone review meeting prior to Construction
Documents.
Steinberg Hart
20 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFP
WORKPLAN SCHEDULE
WEEKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WEEKS 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 WEEKS 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80—84 Site Evaluations &
Master Planning
Space
Programming
Rom Cost
Estimate
30% Cost
Estimate
60% Cost
Estimate
100% Cost
Estimate
Schematic Design
City
Review
City
Review
City
Review
City
Review
Design Development
Permitting
Modifications to the Design, Reports, or Studies as Needed for Entitlements / CEQA Construction Documents
Construction Documents
Environmental
Entitlement Support
Environmental
Entitlement Support
CORE MEETING CHECK-INS DELIVERABLE MILESTONE
KICKOFF KICKOFF
MEETINGMEETING
APRIL 2026APRIL 2026 JULY 2026JULY 2026
DEC 2027DEC 2027
CITY REVIEW CITY REVIEW
MEETINGMEETING
CITY REVIEW CITY REVIEW
MEETINGMEETING
CITY CITY
REVIEW REVIEW
MEETINGMEETING
CITY REVIEW CITY REVIEW
MEETINGMEETING
CITY REVIEW CITY REVIEW
MEETINGMEETING
CITY REVIEW CITY REVIEW
MEETINGMEETING
CITY REVIEW CITY REVIEW
MEETINGMEETING
NTPNTP DRAFT CAMPUS DRAFT CAMPUS
MASTER PLANMASTER PLAN
DRAFT SPACE DRAFT SPACE
PROGRAMPROGRAM
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
SPECIFICATIONSSPECIFICATIONS
100% CONSTRUCTION 100% CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTSDOCUMENTS
90% 90%
CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTSDOCUMENTS
BUILDING BUILDING
PERMIT PERMIT
SUBMITTALSUBMITTAL
FINAL MASTERPLAN & FINAL MASTERPLAN &
SPACE PROGRAMSPACE PROGRAM
SCHEMATIC DESIGN SCHEMATIC DESIGN
OUTLINE SPECIFICATIONSOUTLINE SPECIFICATIONS
Final Revisions to Master
Plan & Space Program
San Diego County, Public Health Lab | Steinberg Hart
F
QUALITY CONTROL
AND ASSURANCE
21 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AND APPROACH
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Steinberg Hart's program integrates quality assurance and quality control in every step of project development, with these steps being completed at each phase.
Office Standard Checklist – Documentation and
interdisciplinary coordination checklist comprise Steinberg Hart's standard check lists.
• Documentation Checklist – The Project Architect is
responsible for completing our office standard checklist of requirements for information that must be included
in the documents at each phase.
• Ready-Check List – The checklist is a comprehensive
and detailed sheet-based list of content that is
continually updated and refined by our Architects.
T echnical Review – At the end of each phase, the
technical lead performs a comprehensive review for
code compliance, system coordination, specification
consistency, detail refinement, and overall constructibility.
Management Review – The Project Manager meets with the
team and QAQC technical lead to review checklists, redi- check lists, and technical comments, verifying alignment with scope, design criteria, program, and client goals. This process evaluates project size, configuration, aesthetics, materials, and systems to confirm the integrity of the overall vision and goals before advancing to the next phase.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Steinberg Hart employs rigorous Quality Assurance (QA)
processes that ensure effective and comprehensive Quality Control (QC) checks. Our QA processes include:
• Checklists – tailored to project type, checklists ensure scope completeness, code compliance, coordination,
and documentation standards are addressed before
formal review
• Interdisciplinary Coordination (Ready Check) – a
construction document phase discipline-specific
coordination review tools that proactively align
construction documents across consultants in
conjunction with formal QAQC milestone reviews
• Construction Documents Standards and Resources
Library – firmwide documentation standards and
technical detailing resources
• Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) – real-time
collaboration platform that enables ongoing model and
drawing review throughout each phase, resolving issues
early and streamlining formal QC reviews
By implementing a rigorous and continuous QA process, we streamline formal QC reviews—resolving issues proactively between milestones so reviews are more focused, efficient, and strategic rather than corrective.
PROJECT-SPECIFIC QAQC WORKFLOW
Beginning in Schematic Design (SD), the team conducts
an internal and consultant coordination review to confirm alignment with design intent, program, and major
interdisciplinary requirements. While no formal QA/QC
page-turn occurs during SD, this early checkpoint ensures the project is on track before advancing.
Formal QC reviews begin in Design Development and
are conducted at the 50% and 95% milestones. The
same structured review process continues through
Construction Documents at 50% and 95%, providing clear
quality benchmarks and disciplined progression toward a coordinated, constructible set.
The QAQC team is flexible to accommodate project
specific needs that deviate from typical QAQC
workflows. Independent T echnical Review (ITD’s) are
available upon request and/or based on project need.
FORMAL QC REVIEW INCLUDES:
• Review by senior QC staff with over 40 years experience and is a licensed builder.
• Comprehensive “page-turn” review of drawings and
specifications in Bluebeam
• Detailed commentary and redlines issued to design
team
• Verification of:
- Code compliance
- Constructability and technical coordination
- Crosscheck of consultant coordination
- Consistent implementation of Steinberg Hart
standards
• Formal close-out to confirm all comments are
resolved before advancing, with the Project Manager
acknowledging and signing off on the QC backcheck.
Quality assurance extends through Construction
Administration, where our team remains actively engaged and available to provide technical input, clarify design intent, and support resolution of field conditions. This continuity ensures that the rigor applied during design is carried through construction, reinforcing document
integrity and minimizing risk.
LAPD Headquarters | Roth Sheppard Architects
G
ADDITIONAL
RELEVANT
INFORMATION
22 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
FIRM RECOGNITION
Award-Winning Design Excellence
BACK-TO-BACK ENR PROJECT OF THE
YEAR AWARD WINNERS
Steinberg Hart was awarded the ENR Project of the
Y ear for Government Buildings in 2024 and 2025,
demonstrating a sustained record of excellence
in delivering complex civic projects through
collaborative leadership and technical rigor.
10 89 6
LEED PLATINUM
PROJECTS
ZERO NET ENERGY
PROJECTS
LEED
PROJECTS
At Steinberg Hart, we deliver award-winning sustainable designs that are as beautiful and responsible as they
are efficient and economical. Our approach consistently achieves Net Zero, LEED Platinum, and LEED Gold
performance—even within tight budgets—by identifying
high-value design opportunities early in the process.
We focus on cost-effective, high-return strategies that enhance occupant comfort, reduce utility costs, and
increase operational efficiency.
Through a combination of rigorous performance analysis
and a deep understanding of place, we create buildings
that are both contextually rooted and future-ready—
aligning with Moreno Valley's vision for resilient, high- performing infrastructure. By emphasizing pragmatic,
efficient, and economically viable solutions, Steinberg Hart helps shape sustainable futures for our communities. Our nationally recognized portfolio demonstrates a consistent ability to meet ambitious environmental goals without
compromising aesthetics, function, or budget.
AWARD-WINNING SUSTAINABLE CIVIC PROJECTS
San Diego County,
Public Health Lab
ENR Regional Best
Projects
LEED Platinum
San Diego County
Operations Center
AIA California Council,
Design Award of Merit
for Sustainable Design
LEED Platinum & Gold
Crafton Hills College,
Public Safety and
Allied Health Building
CMACN/AIACA Grand
Award
LEED Gold
Historic Riverside
Courthouse
Renovation
California Preservation
Foundation Award
SELWC | SELECT AWARDS
American Public Works Association,
Project of the Y ear Award
ENR Excellence in Sustainability
ENR Best in Class
ENR Project of the Y ear, Public Building
DBIA National Award of Merit
DBIA Western-Pacific Design-Build
Innovation Award
DBIA Western-Pacific Award of
Excellence for Diversity
23 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
FUTURE-FOCUSED CAMPUS PLANNING
Phase 1A
Phase 1B
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Work By Other Architects
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OPERATIONS CENTER | 2O YEARS OF IMPLEMENTABLE CAMPUS PLANNING Since 2007 , Steinberg Hart has partnered with the County of San Diego to implement the 950,000 SF San Diego County Operations Center (COC). As master planners and designers for nearly every facility on campus, Steinberg Hart established the original space planning, finish, and furnishing standards. These guidelines that have since been adopted across newer County facilities and other public agencies. The plan’s clarity and flexibility enabled each project to be delivered on time and within budget while coordinating the needs of multiple tenant departments and meeting sustainability goals.
Over two decades, the campus has been built out as envisioned, demonstrating the strength and durability of the master plan. Steinberg Hart continues to support ongoing campus optimization, including tenant improvement procedures and strategies for evolving workplace models. "To my knowledge I am only aware of two campuses that have been planned and built to the design on day 1, those campuses are the COC and the Coastal Campus. Two examples of successful campus planning and architecture in use today." – Marko Medved, Director,
Department of General Services, County of San Diego
Steinberg Hart led the master planning and design of the 91,000 SF Boulevard Border Patrol Station, a 32-acre mission- critical campus supporting continuous federal law enforcement operations along the Southern California border. Integrating administrative, enforcement, training, detention, and asset- support functions within a secure and highly coordinated site, the campus was planned for long-term operational evolution and continues to accommodate expanding mission needs without compromising security circulation clarity, or staff functionality.
This experience directly informs the Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus, where similar challenges include integrating multiple public safety functions, supporting continuous operations and resilience, balancing public access with secure environments, and preserving flexibility for future growth.
The original campus master plan continues
to support evolving operational needs,
demonstrating the value of disciplined,
future-focused public safety planning.
DHS CUSTOMS AND BORDER PATROL BOULEVARD BORDER PATROL STATION
H
REQUIRED
STATEMENTS
San DIego County, Sheriff Technology and Information Center | Steinberg Hart 24 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart I | Steinberg Hart confirms all charges for Consultant
services are a “Not-to-Exceed” f ee which include s
conservatively estimated reimbursable expenses.
J | Steinberg Hart will document and provide the results of the work to the satisfaction of the City.
K | Steinberg Hart has included as part of our Proposal an hourly rate schedule for use in
invoicing for progress
payments and for extra work incurred that is not part of this RFP.
L | Steinberg Hart will not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment because of race,
color, religion, s ex, or national origin.
M | Steinberg Hart will adhere to all federal laws and
regulations, not withstanding any state or local laws and regulations, and that in a case of conflict between federal, state, or local laws or regulations, the strictest shall be adhered to.
N | Steinberg H
art will allow all authorized fede ral, state,
county, and City officials access to the place of work, books, document s, papers, fis cal, payroll, mat erials, and other relevant contract records pe rtinent to this Project.
O | St einberg Hart will comply with the Davis-Bacon Fair Labor Standar ds Act (40 USC 276-a through a-7), and
the implementation regulations issued pursuant thereto
(29 CFR Section 1, 5), any amendments thereof and the
California Labor Code.
P | Steinberg Hart will comply with the C opeland Anti- Kickb ack Act (18 USC 8 74) and the Implementation
Regulation (29 CFR 3) issued pursuant thereto, and any
amendments thereof.
Q | Steinberg Hart offers and agrees to assign to the City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 USC Sec. 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2 [commencing
with Section 16700] of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials pursuant to the public works or the subcontract.
A | Steinberg Hart confirms that this RFP shall be
incorporated in its entirety as a part of the Consultant's Proposal.
B | Steinberg Hart confirms that this RFP and the
Consultant's Proposal will jointly become part of the
Agreement for Professional Consultant Services for this Project when said Agreement is fully executed by the
Consultant and the City of Moreno Valley.
C | Steinberg Hart confirms that our Services to be
provided, and fees therefore, will be in accordance with the City's RFP
D | Steinberg Hart has no "ADDITIONS OR EXCEPTIONS TO
THE CITY'S REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL" to provide.
E | Steinberg Hart has a 30+ year history working with civic institutions delivering public safety projects that make our communities safer. We have assembled a dedicated
team with extensive experience managing and executing
complex projects for municipalities throughout California and Riverside County.
Section C: Qualifications and Experience provides
detailed information on our qualifications, recent similar projects, and references for the City's verification.
Consultant Staff resumes and Sub-Consultant T eam
resumes are provided in the Appendix to further outline the qualifications, and proposed duties of the proposed Staff assigned to this Project.
F | Steinberg Hart acknowledges providing all necessary vehicles, equipment, tools, uniforms, all incidentals for the staff member(s) to perform the required services.
We confirm that full compensation for providing vehicles, equipment, tools, uniforms, all incidentals shall be
considered to be included in the ‘Not-to-Exceed” fee as part of the Fee Proposal, and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor.
G | A resource allocation matrix has been provided on the following page.
H | Steinberg Hart acknowledges and understands that
Steinberg Hart will provide a qualified alternate staff in the event that the primary staff member is not able to come to work.
REQUIRED STATEMENTS
Required Statements A-Q
Photo Caption - Project Name & Location Here
Steinberg Hart
25 Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFP
RESOURCE ALLOCATION MATRIX
120-weeks 4-weeks 4-weeks 52-weeks 12-weeks 16-weeks 18-weeks 2-weeks 100-weeks 2-weeks
LABOR TITLE
PROJECT
MGMT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVAL
& MASTER
PLANNING
SPACE
PROGRAMMING
ENVIRONMENTAL
& ENTITLEMENT
SUPPORT
SD DD CD PERMITTING
& BIDDING CA PROJECT
CLOSEOUT
TOTAL EST.
HOURS BY
TITLE
Project Director /
Principal-in-Charge 60 8 20 60 16 24 32 10 40 5 275
Project Manager /
Associate Principal 850 40 20 156 100 320 360 80 300 60 2286 Design Director /
Principal 0 40 20 0 100 80 20 0 0 0 260
Project Architect /
Associate Principal 0 20 20 40 320 320 720 140 0 0 1580 SD/DD/ CD Job
Captain 0 0 0 0 0 320 720 0 0 0 1140
SD/DD/CD
Designer 0 80 80 100 320 320 720 0 0 0 1620
Sustainability /
Associate Principal 0 20 20 20 20 40 20 0 30 40 210
QA/QC 0 0 0 0 25 40 80 0 80 0 225
Construction
Contract Admin /
Job Captain
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 50 1450
Lead Planner 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
Construction
Contract Admin 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 40 140
TOTAL EST.
HOURS BY
PHASE
950 248 180 376 1001 1464 2672 230 1910 195 9226
TOTAL ESTIMATED
PROJECT HOURS 9226
County of San Diego, SELWC | Steinberg Hart
I
APPENDIX
I
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
VINCENT MUDD GC
Steinberg Hart | Managing Partner
As Project Director, Vincent will work continuously with City Stakeholders and the design team to ensure the project vision, cost, and schedule remain aligned. With a career spanning architecture, finance, general contracting, and operations, Vincent offers a uniquely comprehensive perspective that bridges design excellence with construction practicality and fiscal discipline.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Director
BRANDON NASH AIA, DBIA, WELL AP , LFA, FITWEL
Steinberg Hart | Principal
PROJECT ROLE: Principal-in-Charge
YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY San Diego, CA
YMCA Programming Study and Master Plan
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
Public Health Lab 53,500 SF
NAVFAC SW Coronado, CA
B169 and Combat T raining T ank Study
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY San Diego, CA
San Diego State University West - Innovation Campus* 291 acres KINGSBARN REALTY CAPITAL Escondido, CA
Aspire Multi-Family Development 200,000 SF
Brandon is an architectural leader recognized for delivering exceptional service, even in today’s increasingly complex design and construction environment. As Principal- in-Charge Brandon will work with Vincent and Jason to organize the team, lending his extensive experience navigating complex campus projects to ensure this project stays on time and on budget. His experience delivering five Emergency Operations Centers for the Navy will directly inform his strategic oversight and technical leadership on this project.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
Sheriff T echnology and Information Center 47 ,000 SF
Public Health Lab 53,500 SF
Utilization Study
U.S. DEPT OF THE NAVY, NAVFAC SOUTHWEST Coronado, CA
Naval Base Coastal Campus, Master Planning IDIQ 1,500,000 SF NBC CC China Lake Indoor Dynamic Shooting Range & T raining Facility 80,000 SF NAWS China Lake Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Station 20,800 SF NAWS Air T raffic Control T ower & Joint Emergency Control Center 30,000 SF P-1901 NAWS China Lake Integration Laboratory 75,800
EDUCATION
NewSchool of Architecture and Design
Bachelor of Architecture
REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, CA #C36001
Designated Design-Build Professional
Fitwell Ambassador (Fitwell)
Green Building Compliance Professional
WELL AP
EDUCATION
San Diego State University
Moreno Valley High School
REGISTRATION
Licensed General Contractor, California
SELECT AFFILIATIONS
Burnham Center for Community
Advancement (BCCA), Director
SD Regional Economic Development
Corporation, Former Chairman
II
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
KATEE CHARD AIA, NCARB
Steinberg Hart | Associate Principal
Katee will work closely with the City and leverage her knowledge and experience to lead our internal technical team. With a focus on delivering high quality plans and project specifications Katee is known for her ability to balance strong design vision with complex technical and regulatory requirements, consistently steering multi-agency coordination efforts with clarity, focus, and efficiency.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Architect
CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad, CA
Orion Center, Maintenance and Operations Campus* 60,000 SF Fleet Maintenance Refurbishment* 11,700 SF
CITY OF SOLANA BEACH Solana Beach, CA
Civic Center Master Plan* 200,000 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
Borrego Springs Fire Station Refurbishment*
* Experience prior to Steinberg Hart
JASON MAUNE AIA, FITWEL
Steinberg Hart | Associate Principal
Having managed his own design studio for fifteen years prior to Steinberg Hart, Jason is highly adept at managing teams for large scale projects, coordinating multiple teams and trades on numerous projects simultaneously. He understands the importance of safely delivering a project on time and on budget and that only when the team’s goals are aligned with the client’s can the project be a true success.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Manager
LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT Los Angeles, CA
Palms Fire Station #43 15,000 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
San Diego Public Health Lab 53,500 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
COC Utilization Study
NAVAL BASE CORONADO Coronado, CA
Coronado Coastal Campus 1,500,000 SF
EDUCATION
University of Missouri, Columbia
Bachelor of Science, Environmental
Design
REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, CA # C35053
Fitwell Ambassador (Fitwell)
EDUCATION
T exas T ech University
Bachelor of Architecture
REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, CA #C37408
National Council of Architectural
Registration Board (NCARB)
iii
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
FREDRiK NiLSSON AIA, LEED AP
Steinberg Hart | Principal & Design Director
PROJECT ROLE: Design Director
With more than two decades of experience on a range of project types and scales, Fredrik brings a keen design intelligence to civic and commercial buildings. Fredrik will lead the design of thew new Public Safety joint facility and will work with the entire design team and Moreno Valley client group to create a “big picture” vision for the project that supports the City’s vision and meets the project goals.
LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles Police Department Administration Building* 500,000 SF CONFIDENTIAL CLIENT El Segundo, CA
Aerospace Innovation Center and Office Campus Masterplan* 400,000 SF UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Los Angeles, CA
USC Health Sciences Administrative Offices* 120,000 SF
BRIDGE HOUSING San Marcos, CA
Bridge San Marcos Creekside Study 2.9 acres
* Experience prior to Steinberg Hart
DANiEL STEWART AIA, NCARB, LEED AP
Steinberg Hart | Partner
Dan is an award‑winning architect and certified planner with more than four decades of experience leading complex programming, planning, and campus‑scale development efforts for civic, federal, and institutional clients.
His work emphasizes long‑range visioning grounded in real‑world delivery strategies, ensuring that complex public facilities can evolve with community and operational needs.
PROJECT ROLE: Lead Planner
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
County Operations Center Master Plan & Entitlements 1,215,000 SF County Operations Center Phases 1a and 1b 600,000 SF
Sheriff T echnology & Information Center 47 ,000 SF
Public Health Laboratory 50,000 SF
Southeastern Live Well Center 60,000 SF
U.S. DEPT OF THE NAVY, NAVFAC SOUTHWEST Coronado, CA
Coronado Coastal Campus 1,500,000 SF
CITY OF OXNARD Oxnard, CA
Fire Administration and Emergency Operations Center 23,000 SF
EDUCATION
Southern California Institute of
Architecture (SCI‑ Arc)
Bachelor of Architecture
REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, CA # C38147
LEED Accredited Professional
EDUCATION
University of Arizona
Bachelor of Architecture
REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, CA # C15505
Certified Planner # 030994
LEED Accredited Professional
IV
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
JANENE CHRISTOPHER AIA, NCARB, LEED AP
Steinberg Hart | Quality Assurance Director
PROJECT ROLE: Quality Assurance and Quality Control
Janene has over 39 years of experience in the design and project management of public facilities. She has been responsible for projects affecting over 1,000 public buildings in Southern California, including more than 30 fire stations. Janene is responsible for ensuring each project adheres to Steinberg Hart’s quality management program which integrates quality control into each stage of the project’s development.
ORANGE COUNTY FIRE AUTHORITY Irvine, CA
Irvine Civic Center Fire Station #6 10,000 SF
Ladera Ranch Fire Station #6 – Division Headquarters 15,000 SF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT Los Angeles, cA
Palms Fire Station #43 15,000 SF
Westchester Fire Station #5 17 ,000 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
Southeastern Live Well Center 65,000 SF
Sheriff T echnology and Information Center 47 ,000 SF
County Operations Center 600,000 SF
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Boulevard, CA
Boulevard Border Patrol Campus 91,000 SF
U.S. DEPT OF THE NAVY, NAVFAC SOUTHWEST Coronado, CA
Naval Base Coastal Campus, Master Planning IDIQ 1,500,000 SF NAWS China Lake Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Station 20,800 SF
EDUCATION
California Polytechnic State University,
San Luis Obispo, Master of Architecture,
Henry Adams Medal
REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, CA # C19748
SELECT AFFILIATIONS
Women in Architecture
California Women in Environmental Design
V
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
ROTH SHEPPARD ARCHITECTS
Public Safety Design
Lenexa Justice Center, Lenexa, KS
Fossil Ridge Public Safety Facility, Thornton, CO
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• Lewisville Public Safety Campus, Lewisville, TX
• Dickinson Public Safety Center, Dickinson, ND
• Fossil Ridge Public Safety Facility, Thornton, CO
• Lancaster Public Safety Building, Lancaster, TX
• Aurora Public Safety Facilities Master Plan, Aurora, CO • Rocky Mountain Rescue Group HQ, Boulder, CO
• Boulder Regional Fire T raining Facilities, Boulder, CO • Firestone Police & Municipal Court, Firestone, CO
• Lenexa Justice Center, Lenexa, KS
• Garden Grove PD & Civic Center, Garden Grove, CA
• LAWA Police Facility Master Plan, Los Angeles, CA
• Loveland Police & Courts Master Plan, Loveland, CO
• Atlanta Police and Fire Department Annex, Atlanta, GA • Harris County Sheriff’s Office Campus, Houston, TX
• Moreno Valley Public Safety Building, Moreno Valley, CA • LAPD Headquarters Facility, Los Angeles, CA
CONTACT
Brian Berryhill, AIA, NCARB
Principal
T 405.317 .1343
E [email protected]
3370 Walnut Street
Denver, Colorado 80205
Our commitment since 1983 is enhancing lives through
design. As a nationally recognized firm based in Denver, we specialize in meaningful architectural and planning
services. We excel at public safety facility planning and design, with over 120 projects across the US and Canada.
We focus on creating operationally efficient, beautiful spaces that promote security and well-being.
We are nationally-recognized specialists in our field and present regularly at the Station Design Conference and
other public safety design forums, with topics ranging from “Police Officer Wellbeing: How Building Design Impacts
Mental & Physical Health” (2025) to “Applying Building and Accessibility Codes to Fire and Police Facilities: the Good, the Bad, and the Gray” (2023).
We are passionate about serving those who serve others.
Our team thrives in the research and information-gathering phase when ‘getting to know’ our clients. We ask a lot of questions and we listen to your answers.
We do this because we know that the best projects come
from collaboration with both stakeholders and building
users. Through our process, we can learn and distill each agency’s specific personality, operations, and necessities.
Using this foundation, we can uncover architectural
solutions unique to every client and every project.
We are relentless explorers, committed to exceeding
clients’ expectations and delivering meaningful solutions.
Roth Sheppard Architects is engaged in current nationwide conversations about law enforcement design and is
committed to advancing those conversations by asking
and redefining what a public safety facility can be. We both understand today’s best practices and use them to seek
tomorrow’s ‘leading-edge’ innovations.
Our design process begins with listening and research. Our best work comes from collaborating with our clients. Our promise is to guide you every step of the way.
VI
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
BRIAN BERRYHILL AIA, NCARB
Roth Sheppard Architects | Principal
Brian is an experienced architect who brings a wealth of knowledge to the design and planning of municipal and public safety projects. His work with communities across the country has honed his ability to lead teams of design professionals as well as guide municipalities from project inception through close-out.
Last September, Brian served on the 2025 Fire House Station Design Awards Jury in Chicago. His recent presentations include “Applying Building and Accessibility Codes to Fire and Police Facilities: the Good, the Bad, and the Gray” (2023 Station Design Conference) and “Police Officer Wellbeing: How Building Design Impacts Mental & Physical Health” (2025 Station Design Conference).
PROJECT ROLE: Public Safety Specialist
CITY OF LEWISVILLE Lewisville, TX
Lewisville Public Safety Campus 121,500 SF
CITY OF AURORA Aurora, CO
Aurora Public Safety Facilities Master Plan 500,000+ SF ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESCUE GROUP Boulder, CO
Rocky Mountain Rescue Group Headquarters 16,780 SF
EDUCATION
University of Oklahoma, Bachelor of
Architecture, 2008
REGISTRATION
Colorado: #404216
American Institute of Architects
NCARB
IACP
TYLER JOSEPH AIA, LEED GA, NCARB
Roth Sheppard Architects | Design Director
T yler is an accomplished design architect with a particular emphasis in civic and public safety facilities. She has experience balancing multiple tasks and projects, as well as moving efficiently from ‘big-picture’ ideas to small design details. T yler’s ability to listen and analyze the client’s needs allow her to craft complex program requirements into simple, elegant design concepts and architectural solutions.
She has presented her findings in design forums across the country including “Police Officer Wellbeing: How Building Design Impacts Mental & Physical Health“ (2025 Station Design Conference) and “Gaining Community Support for Public Safety Facilities” (2023 Station Design Conference).
PROJECT ROLE: Public Safety Specialist
CITY OF THORNTON Thornton, CO
Fossil Ridge Public Safety Center 36,000 SF
CITY OF DICKINSON Dickinson, ND
Dickinson Public Safety Center 42.501 SF
CITY OF LENEXA Lenexa, KS
Lenexa Justice Center 115,432 SF
EDUCATION
Master of Architecture, CU Denver 2012
Bachelor of Arts, U. of Pittsburgh 2008
REGISTRATION
Colorado: #404385
U.S.G.B.C. (LEED GA)
NCARB: #84597
VII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
PSOMAS
Civil Engineering, Environmental, and Land Surveying Services
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• Valley Communications Center, San Bernardino, CA
• Public Defenders Office, San Bernardino, CA
• Otay Mesa Land Port of Entry Expansion and
Modernization, Otay Mesa, CA
• Calexico Land Port of Entry Phase 2B, Calexico, CA
• San Luis Port of Entry, San Luis, AZ
• Santee Community Center, Santee, CA
• I-10 Border Protection Station, Blythe, CA
• Palm Springs International Airport Layout Plan (ALP)
Boundary Survey, Palm Springs, CA
• Menifee Justice Center, Menifee, CA
• Moorpark Civic Center Master Plan, Moorpark, CA
• Correctional Development Facility, California City, CA • Pitchess Detention Center Women’s Village EIR, Los
Angeles, CA
CONTACT
Chase Lawson, PE, ENV SP
Project Manager
T 619.961.2839
E [email protected]
401 B St #1600, Wells Fargo Plaza
San Diego, CA 92101
Psomas is a multidisciplinary consulting firm providing civil engineering, environmental planning and permitting, land surveying and mapping, transportation engineering, and
related technical services to public agencies throughout Southern California. With an established Riverside office and decades of experience in Riverside County, Psomas
brings deep local knowledge, strong agency relationships, and proven experience delivering complex public-sector
and campus-style projects.
For the Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus, Psomas
will provide civil engineering, environmental, and land surveying services in close coordination with Steinberg Hart to support a joint -use police and fire facility designed for 24/7 operations, secure circulation, and future
expansion.
Psomas has completed more than 50 projects within
the City of Moreno Valley and is highly familiar with City standards, procedures, and review processes. Recent and ongoing work includes a City Utility Building, a Behavioral Health Facility for Riverside University Health System, and the Rancho Belago EIR, with the City serving as Lead Agency—demonstrating our close coordination with City
Planning staff and City -led environmental review. Psomas has also held multiple on-call contracts with the City for Land Surveying, Engineering, Construction Management,
and CEQA services.
Psomas maintains a strong presence throughout
Riverside County and the Inland Empire, serving agencies such as UCR, RCCD, RUSD, and RTA. Our campus-style
and public safety experience includes projects with
shared infrastructure, controlled access, and long -term expansion planning, as well as security -focused facilities for the State of California and the San Bernardino Valley Communications Center, a 15-acre public safety campus.
Psomas offers Steinberg Hart a locally established,
integrated subconsultant to support efficient delivery of a resilient, well-coordinated public safety campus for the City of Moreno Valley.
RTA Vine Street Mobility Hub, Riverside, CA (APWA
Inland Empire – 2024 Overall Project of the Y ear)
Otay Land Port of Entry Expansion and
Modernization, Otay Mesa, CA (APWA San Diego/
Imperial Counties Chapter – 2025 Project of the Y ear)
VIII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
SARAH K. CURRAN PE, QSD
Psomas | Vice President/Principal-in-Charge (Civil)
Sarah Curran brings 24 years of civil engineering experience leading site and infrastructure design for public-sector and institutional facilities. She manages multidisciplinary teams delivering site evaluation, grading, drainage, utilities, stormwater management, and off-site improvements for municipal, county, state, and federal clients, including facilities requiring secure, continuous operations. Sarah regularly coordinates with architects, environmental consultants, surveyors, and reviewing agencies to advance projects through planning, design, permitting, and construction, and is known for strong technical oversight and efficient delivery on high-visibility public projects.
PROJECT ROLE: Principal-in-Charge
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY San Bernardino, CA
Valley Communications Center 6.5 (AC)
Public Defenders Office 42,337 (SF)
U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) Various
Otay Mesa Land Port of Entry Expansion and Modernization 10 (AC) Calexico Land Port of Entry Phase 2B 33,000 (SF)
San Luis Land Port of Entry 18 (AC)
EDUCATION
University of Vermont
BS Civil Engineering
REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer, CA, AZ
Qualified SWPPP
Developer/California Stormwater Quality
Association
CHASE LAWSON PE, ENV SP
Psomas | Project Manager (Civil)
Chase Lawson has nine years of experience delivering civil engineering and environmental support for public and institutional projects across California and the Southwest. His work includes municipal and federal facilities, K–12 and higher education campuses, community centers, parks, and large multi-acre sites requiring site planning, grading, drainage, utilities, stormwater management, and survey coordination. Chase supports CEQA documentation, environmental permitting, and sustainability-driven design, and collaborates with architects, environmental specialists, and public agencies to deliver resilient facilities that support public safety, long-term community needs, and quality of life.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Manager
CITY OF SANTEE Santee, CA
Santee Community Center 30,000 (SF)
U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) Various
Otay Mesa Land Port of Entry Expansion and Modernization 10 (AC) Calexico Land Port of Entry Phase 2B 33,000 (SF)
San Luis Land Port of Entry 18 (AC)
EDUCATION
San Diego State University
Master of Engineering (expected)
San Diego Sate University
BS Civil Engineering
REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer, CA
Envision Sustainability
Professional/Institute for Sustainable
Infrastructure
IX
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
WILLIAM ESTEPA PLS
Psomas | Vice President/Regional Office Manager/Associate Principal (Survey) William Estepa brings more than 25 years of experience providing land surveying services for municipal, state, and other public sector projects, with a strong focus on boundary and topographic surveys, right of way mapping, construction staking, and survey support for site development. His background includes survey services for public facilities, transportation and utility infrastructure, and large, complex sites requiring coordination with civil engineers, environmental consultants, and multiple reviewing agencies. William is highly experienced in cadastral research, title and easement review, Record of Survey preparation, and quality control oversight, and is well versed in meeting local, county, and state agency standards.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Manager
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY Moreno Valley, CA
On-Call Land Surveying Services -
CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF GENERAL SERVICES Beaumont, Patton, Blythe, CA California Highway Patrol - San Gorgonio Pass Area Office 96,800 (SF) Patton State Hospital Waterline Replacement -
I-10 Border Protection Station 38 (AC)
PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (PSP) Palm Springs, CA Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Boundary Survey 950 (AC)
EDUCATION
California State Polytechnic University,
Pomona
BS Civil Engineering
REGISTRATION
Professional Land Surveyor, CA
CHARLES HOLCOMBE III
Psomas | Regional Environmental Lead /Associate (Environmental) Charles is a senior Environmental Planner and Project Manager with more than 20 years of experience providing CEQA and NEPA compliance for public-sector and municipal infrastructure projects. He has prepared and managed EIRs, Initial Studies/Mitigated Negative Declarations, Environmental Assessments, General Plan updates, and Specific Plans for public safety facilities, civic and institutional uses, transportation improvements, utilities, and urban development projects. Charles brings strong technical expertise in CEQA and NEPA, with extensive experience coordinating with public agencies, supporting public review processes, and delivering environmental clearance in support of complex, schedule-driven projects.
PROJECT ROLE: Senior Environmental Planner/ Project Manager HIGHLAND FAIRVIEW PROPERTIES Moreno Valley, CA
Rancho Belago Estates Specific Plan EIR 1,820 (AC)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Riverside County, CA
Public Safety Enterprise Communication Facilities Programmatic EIR
52,000 (SF)
CITY OF ARCADIA Arcadia, CA
T own Center Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 440,938 (SF)
EDUCATION
University of Redlands
MBA Business Administration
University of Redlands
BS Environmental Studies
Borrego Springs Library, County Park, &
Sheriff Office
X
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Structural Engineering
County Of San Diego, Fire Station No. 43
Borrego Springs, Sheriff Office
SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Borrego Springs Library, County Park, & Sheriff Office • County Of San Diego, Fire Station No. 43
• Port Of Los Angeles Police Headquarters Facility & Parking Structure
• Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department Emergency
Vehicle Operations Center (Evoc)
• City Of Inglewood Seismic Retrofit Design Of City Hall, Police Station, & Library Buildings
• City of Richmond Chevron Firehouse & Emergency
Operations Center
• Chula Vista Fire Station No. 1, Apparatus Bay Opening Enlargement
• City Of Coronado Police Department, Police Services
Mobile Command Shade Structure
• County of San Diego, Harbison Canyon Fire Station No. 24 • Mountain View Fire Station No. 5
CONTACT
Eric Lehmkuhl, SE LEED AP
Managing Principal
T (619) 521-8500
E [email protected]
3131 Camino Del Rio North Suite 1080
San Diego, CA 92108
Founded in 1960, KPFF Consulting Engineers is one of the largest civil and structural engineering firms in the country.
We successfully leverage the resources of our firm while maintaining the personal contact we view as essential.
CLIENT SERVICE PHILOSOPHY
The cornerstone of KPFF’s philosophy is the freedom the individual has to seek creative and economic solutions
for our clients’ engineering needs. Participating as
team members, we explore the broader issues involved
in projects today. This combination of creativity and
integrated team participation leads to the high-quality service that our clients have come to expect.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Structural engineering areas of practice include
consultation to architects, contractors, and owners for the design of all building types.
Services include:
• New building design
• Renovations
• T enant improvements
• Seismic evaluations
• Seismic retrofits
• Equipment anchorage
In addition to building design, KPFF performs structural engineering for all types of structures including antenna towers, solar energy projects, and bridges.
PROTECTIVE DESIGN
KPFF is widely regarded as an industry leader in protective design services for highly -sensitive property assets,
including blast protection, perimeter security design,
physical security planning and implementation, and
progressive collapse design.
• Value engineering studies
• Peer review/plan check
• General building
evaluations
• Protective design and
physical security
XI
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
ERIC LEHMKUHL SE, LEED AP
KPFF Consulting Engineers | Structural Principal
As Principal-In-Charge on this project, Eric will lead the conceptual design. He will provide technical and managerial guidance to the Project Manager, follow the progress and direction of the work, provide an internal peer review of the documents at critical milestones, as well as check and seal the final documents. During construction, he will approve any changes to the structural design and participate in problem resolution. Eric has 40 years of professional engineering experience, including the design and retrofit of building, bridge, and tower structures. This experience encompasses various buildings occupied by local, state, and federal agencies, including public safety facilities, libraries, and community centers.
PROJECT ROLE: Principal-in-Charge
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Various
Borrego Springs Library, County Park, & Sheriff Office, Borrego Springs, CA 13,500 SF McClellan-Palomar Airport T erminal Buildings, Carlsbad, CA 23,062 SF COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Menifee, CA
Sun City Library Rehabilitation & Expansion 10,700 SF
CITY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
San Ysidro Branch Library 15,000 SF
EDUCATION
San Diego State University
M.S. Civil Engineering (Structures)
University of California, San Diego
B.S. Applied Mechanics
REGISTRATION
Structural Engineer in CA, AZ, KY, NV, and
VT
Civil Engineer in CA
LEED Accredited Professional
XII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
ELEN CONSULTING
MEP Engineering
Northwestern Division Police Station
San Ramon Public Safety Facility
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• March Air Force Base, Moreno Valley, CA
• Riverside Municipal Auditorium, Riverside, CA
• Citrus Heights Police Department and EOC Campus,
Citrus Heights, CA
• County of San Diego , Ohio Street Probation Center
(with Steinberg Hart)
• County of San Diego, SELWC (with Steinberg Hart)
• Northwestern Division Police Station, San Diego, CA
• El T oro Emergency Operation Center, Orange County, CA • Laguna Beach Emergency Operations Center
• Los Altos Emergency Operations Center, Los Altos, CA
• Oceanside Fire T raining Campus, Oceanside, CA
• San Ramon Fire T raining Campus, San Ramon, CA
• Contra Costa County Fire Comm Campus
• Porterville Public Safety Headquarters (Admin and EOC) Porterville, CA
• Naval Base Coronado (with Steinberg Hart)
• Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake (with Steinberg
Hart)
CONTACT
Anton Nathanson PE
Chief Executive Officer
T (619) 550-1085
E [email protected]
5473 Kearny Villa Rd. Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92123
ELEN Consulting, Inc. is a trusted Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) engineering firm specializing in
energy-efficient design solutions for public and private sector projects across the country. Led by principals
with decades of experience, we take a calculated, detail- oriented approach to every project, ensuring each system is thoughtfully integrated, code-compliant, and built to last.
ELEN has earned the trust of hundreds of returning
clients and public agencies across California through our commitment to quality and dependable performance. As a
certified Small Business Enterprise (SBE), our firm delivers large-firm capability but with the agility of a smaller team.
We can provide services tailored to the unique needs of our client and can offer feasibility studies, deficiency analyses, master planning documents for campus-type facilities,
value engineering studies, and commissioning services.
COLLABORATING WITH PUBLIC AGENCIES
ELEN Consulting brings decades of experience
partnering with public agencies at every level, from local municipalities to federal entities. Our engineers understand the detailed review cycles, technical documentation,
and permitting standards that govern civic projects.
Notable agency partners include the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, NAVFAC, CAL FIRE, and others, where our team successfully guided projects through rigorous compliance reviews and multi-agency coordination processes. On top of that, our team has become well-versed in the codes,
standards, and processes that guide public-sector design, including the California Building Code, Title 24 Energy Standards, NFPA, and UFC.
PUBLIC SAFETY PROJECTS
Our team has delivered MEP design services for a wide
range of essential-service facilities—including fire stations, police headquarters, training facilities, and emergency operations centers. These projects demand resilient
systems that sustain full functionality during power loss or emergencies, and our designs consistently meet that
challenge.
XIII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
ANTON NATHANSON PE
ELEN Consulting | Electrical Engineer
Anton Nathanson, PE, brings more than 16 years of experience in electrical engineering design, with a strong portfolio of municipal facilities, including many public safety campuses across California. His expertise spans electrical power distribution, protective systems, emergency and backup power, low-voltage communications, and sustainable energy integration, all of which are critical to supporting the uninterrupted operations of essential services buildings. Anton applies a systems-thinking approach to ensure reliable operations, energy efficiency, and code compliance. His project experience also includes leading electrical design for USGBC LEED-certified facilities achieving Gold and Platinum certifications.
PROJECT ROLE: Principal-in-Charge
DAVID WOLF PE
ELEN Consulting | Mechanical Engineer
PROJECT ROLE: Principal
CALTRANS Fontana, CA
CalT rans Fontana Maintenance Station (Admin, Maintenance, EOC) 14,000 SF SAN RAMON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT San Ramon, CA San Ramon Public Safety Campus (Police, Fire, EOC) 75,000 SF San Ramon Fire T raining Center 20,000 SF
San Ramon Fire Station 34 11,000 SF
CALFIRE Conta Costa, CA
Contra Costa County Campus (Admin, EOC) 15,700SF
David Wolf has over 15 years of HVAC and plumbing experience across a wide range of project types, spanning military facilities, healthcare facilities, manufacturing plants, educational facilities, and civic buildings. He started his early career as an Application Engineer for an international sales team where he helped clients select, size, and integrate chiller systems for a wide range of building types around the world. He also broadened his skills and became an expert on seismic (OSHPD/HCAI) compliance and certification, giving him a strong command of equipment anchorage and safety requirements that exceed typical building standards. David brings his depth of experience at ELEN, where he leads mechanical and plumbing engineers.
CALTRANS Fontana, CA
CalT rans Fontana Maintenance Station (Admin, Maintenance, EOC) 14,000 SF US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE) Mobile, AL
USACE District Headquarters 205,000SF
CITY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
UCSD Fire Station 52 14,000SF
San Carlos Library 25,000SF
EDUCATION
San Diego State University
Bachelor of Science in
Electrical Engineering
REGISTRATION
Professional Electrical Engineer (PE)
CA #E21090
EDUCATION
Virginia T ech
Bachelor of Science in Mechanical
Engineering
REGISTRATION
Professional Mechanical Engineer (PE)
CA #M38667
Certified Plumbing Designer (CPD)
#908635
LEED Green Associate ID-10841157
XIV
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
SCHMIDT DESIGN GROUP
Landscape Architecture
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• T orrey Pines Fire Station No. 52, San Diego, CA
• MiraCosta College Police Substation, San Diego, CA
• San Diego County Emergency Vehicle Operations
Center, San Diego, CA
• San Diego County Y outh T ransition Campus,
San Diego, CA
• Orange County Y outh T ransition Campus, Orange, CA
• Orange County Glassell Campus LID Retrofit,
Orange, CA
• San Diego County Public Health Lab, San Diego, CA
• County Assessor, Recorder, County Clerk Facility,
Santee, CA
• Pacific Highlands Ranch Branch Library, San Diego, CA • Carlsbad City Hall Site Improvements, Carlsbad, CA
• Laguna Woods City Hall, Laguna Woods, CA
• Tierrastana Public Library Renovation, San Diego, CA
CONTACT
Jeffrey T . (JT) Barr
President & Managing Partner
T 619.236.1462
E [email protected]
1310 Rosecrans Street, Suite G
San Diego, CA 92106
Schmidt Design Group (SDG) provides comprehensive
landscape architecture and planning services, with an
emphasis on balancing artistic design with environmental sensitivity. They are a client-centered, service-oriented small business dedicated to creating signature spaces
that reflect the character and vision of the communities in which they work.
Founded in 1983, SDG has 43 years of experience providing successful design solutions for public projects throughout the region. The firm specializes in the design of public facilities that improve the safety and quality of life of their communities. Their work has been recognized with more
than 200 local, state, and national awards for design and technical excellence.
With a dedicated and talented staff of 40 professionals, Schmidt Design Group has the capacity and expertise to
deliver exceptional design and service for the public safety campus project. This staff includes 10 licensed landscape architects, a LEED BD+C accredited professional, two
(2) SITES accredited professionals, two (2) ISA-certified arborists, two (2) certified playground safety inspectors, a qualified SWPPP developer/practitioner, and a certified landscape irrigation auditor.
SDG believes that each site has its own story to tell. It is their privilege to listen, research, and discover that story and express it in the spaces they create. The firm thoughtfully incorporates sustainable solutions into
artful, inspired design to achieve innovative public spaces reflective of the values and ideals of the surrounding
community. SDG has collaborated with architects,
including Steinberg Hart, as well as numerous public
municipalities throughout Southern California and beyond to craft spaces that meet the project needs and capture the cultural and physical characteristics that make a
community special.
County of San Diego Y outh Transition Campus,
San Diego, CA
Fire Station No. 52, San Diego, CA
XV
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
JEFFREY T . (JT) BARR, PLA, ASLA
Schmidt Design Group | President & Managing Partner
JT Barr is a licensed landscape architect with 24 years of professional experience including the design and implementation of dynamic spaces including public service and municipal facilities, civic spaces, pedestrian spaces, streetscapes, and more. He is inspired by creating signature spaces informed by an intimate understanding of context. Mr. Barr provides leadership for projects of varying scales and budgets with an emphasis on developing comprehensive multidisciplinary solutions. His expertise encompasses the design and implementation of spaces that provide sustainable, context-responsive environments.
PROJECT ROLE: Principal Landscape Architect
CITY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
T orrey Pines Fire Station No. 52 14,500 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
Public Health Lab with Steinberg Hart 52,000 SF
Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk Facility
Y outh T ransition Campus
25,000 SF
30 Acres
COUNTY OF ORANGE Orange, CA
Y outh T ransition Campus Phase I 88,000 GSF
Glassell Campus LID Retrofit 10 Acres
EDUCATION
The Ohio State University
Bachelor of Science, Landscape
Architecture
REGISTRATION
Professional Landscape Architect, CA
American Society of Landscape Architects
JESUS AL ÁN FIGUEROA QWEL, ASLA
Schmidt Design Group | Senior Project Manager
Jesus Alán Figueroa has a passion for crafting public spaces that have a long lasting impact on the community and environment, while remaining conscious of the local context and culture. He provides leadership throughout the life of a project, including maintaining regular communication with clients and subconsultants, coordinating design team tasks, and providing manager-level design oversight.
A native Spanish-speaker, Mr. Figueroa regularly assists with translation needs and serves as a cultural resource for the firm during community outreach efforts.
He recognizes the importance of cultural awareness when designing spaces that represent its surrounding community.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Manager, Landscape Architecture
CITY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
T orrey Pines Fire Station No. 52
Tierrasanta Public Library Renovation
14,500 SF
8,700 SF
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO Location
Emergency Vehicle Operation Course 40 Acres
Y outh T ransition Campus
Assessor/Recorder/County Clerk Facility
30 Acres
25,000 SF
EDUCATION
University of Arizona
Masters of Landscape Architecture
University of Arizona
Bachelor of Architecture
REGISTRATION
Qualified Water Efficient Landscaper
American Society of Landscape Architects
XVI
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
NV5
T echnology and Acoustics
Wake County Emergency Operations Center, Raleigh NC
Emergency Operations Center, Carlsbad CA
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• Orange County Board of Supervisors, Santa Ana CA
• Emergency Operations Center, Carlsbad CA
• Emergency Operations Center, Santa Barbara CA
• Emergency Operations Center, McClellan CA
• Police Department Detention Substation, Avondale AZ
• Pima County Emergency Operations Center, T ucson AZ
• Southside Public Safety Building, T ucson AZ
• City Operations Center, Goodyear AZ
• Municipal Center Renovations, Gilbert AZ
• Public Safety Building, Salt Lake City UT
• Emergency Operations Center, Gwinnett GA
• Public Safety Building Emergency Operations Center,
Pittsburgh PA
• Wake County Emergency Operations Center, Raleigh NC
• Public Safety Headquarters, Detroit MI
• Public Safety Campus, Lewisville TX
CONTACT
Tim Waters
Principal-In-Charge
T 213.412.4863
E [email protected]
Los Angeles, CA
The NV5 T echnology & Acoustics group operates with
a mission to help clients navigate an ever-changing
technology landscape through specialized design and
consulting services. Our focus reaches beyond technology itself, extending to the people that interact with the
systems and the overall user experience.
Through the acquisition of The Sextant Group in 2019,
followed by, KMK T echnologies, TDSi, and Professional
Systems Engineering (PSE), our team has grown to over
125 dedicated technology and acoustic professionals
across the United States. We remain focused on bringing innovative solutions to owners and to our design team
partners.
As providers of engineering, technology, and acoustic
consulting services, NV5 serves public and private
owners from offices nationwide and abroad. Our holistic approach with a single point of contact for a broad
range of converged disciplines includes Audiovisual,
IT/T elecom, Security, Lighting, and Acoustics. This
consolidated approach streamlines interdisciplinary
alignment and project delivery, resulting in improved team communication and coordination.
Government facilities, from local to federal, are key
fixtures in our societal infrastructure. They are places where policymakers conduct work of high importance and
complexity. Often representing a significant expenditure on the public’s behalf, innovative and forward-thinking solutions ensure public funding is used efficiently.
From local community chambers and county police/
fire departments to The US House of Representatives
and sprawling military bases, properly designed and
engineered systems help create facilities that successfully support the missions of our civil servants.
NV5 takes pride in helping our clients develop high-quality, cost-effective, and sustainable projects that go Beyond Engineering.
XVII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
TIMOTHY ROSS WATERS, CTS
NV5 | Vice President/Principal Consultant
Beyond a natural affinity for client service, Tim also applies a scientific approach to infrastructure and systems design built on his formal training in math, physics, and music. Clients appreciate his acumen for project and resource management.
Expertise includes audiovisual and information technology convergence, large performing arts venue sound and video design, and intricate videoconferencing / telepresence applications supporting critical business communications. Tim’s innovative and creative talent has been proven time and again throughout his career with hundreds of successful complex projects. He is located in Los Angeles, CA.
PROJECT ROLE: Principal-in-Charge
CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad, CA
Emergency Operations Center 7 ,000 SF
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA Santa Barbara, CA
Emergency Operations Center 13,000 SF
CITY OF DETROIT Detroit, MI
Public Safety Headquarters 400,000 SF
EDUCATION
Principia College
BS, Physics
REGISTRATION
Certified T echnology Specialist (CTS) by
AVIXA
BRYAN DODD, RCDD
NV5 | Senior IT/T elecom & Security Designer
Having completed hundreds of projects in his 20+ years of experience, there are few challenges Bryan hasn’t faced. He is a well-rounded IT/T elecom & Security Designer with projects spanning entertainment, commercial, mixed-use, healthcare, hospitality, higher education, K-12, and government. Some of his well-known clients include Netflix, Disney, Hulu, Coca-Cola, and the University of California. As a soccer coach, surfer, and jujitsu practitioner in his free time, Bryan is a team player, knows the value of hard work and determination, and has strong mental acuity – all characteristics that make him a valuable member of any team. Bryan is located in Los Angeles, CA.
PROJECT ROLE: Lead IT/T elecom & Security Designer
CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad, CA
Emergency Operations Center 7 ,000 SF
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO * San Mateo, CA
Public Safety & City Administration Building 37 ,000 SF CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO * San Francisco, CA
Public Safety Building 290,000 SF
EDUCATION
University of Phoenix
BS, Business Information Systems
ITT T echnical Institute
AS, Electrical Engineering
REGISTRATION
Registered Communications Distribution
Designer (RCDD) by BICSI, the
highest level of certification in the
telecommunications industry * Project under previous employment XVIII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
DAVID DAVIS, CTS-D, CTS-I, ANP
NV5 | Associate Principal, Audiovisual
David brings clients 25 years of systems design and project management experience.
He delivers innovative solutions to clients in all aspects of project design and implementation. With a focus on consulting, design, project management and commissioning of audiovisual and information technology systems, David’s project experience spans a variety of markets including education, corporate, government and private sectors. David is based out of the Los Angeles, CA office.
PROJECT ROLE: Lead Audiovisual Designer
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA Santa Barbara, CA
Board of Supervisors Spaces T echnology Upgrades SF unavailable COUNTY OF ORANGE Orange County, CA
New Civic Center Hearing Room 250,000 SF
LOS ANGELES METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT Detroit, MI
Facility Upgrades SF unavailable
EDUCATION
University of Laverne
BS, Mathematics
REGISTRATION
Certified T echnology Specialist - Design
(CTS-D) by AVIXA
Certified T echnology Specialist -
Installation (CTS-I) by AVIXA
Audiovisual Network Professional (ANP)
by AVIXA
XIX
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
COFFMAN ENGINEERS
Fire Protection Engineering
Ohio Street Probation Facility, San Diego, CA
Torrey Pines Fire Station 52, La Jolla, CA
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• Fire Station 50, San Diego, CA
• T orrey Pines Fire Station 52, La Jolla, CA
• Carlsbad Fire Station 2, Carlsbad, CA
• Jacumba Fire Station 43, San Diego, CA
• Sac Metro Fire Vineyard Station 67 , Sacramento, CA
• City of Carlsbad Orion Center, Carlsbad, CA
• Lake Forect Civic Center Administrative Building, Lake Forest, CA
• GSA Schwartz Federal Building Remodel, San Diego, CA
• CHP Baldwin Park Area Office Replacement, Baldwin,
Park, CA
• Ohio Street Probation Facility, San Diego, CA
CONTACT
Aman Shah, PE
Principal, Fire Protection Engineering
T 619.642.2191
E [email protected]
1455 Frazze Rd, Suite 600
San Diego, CA 92108
Coffman is a locally driven engineering firm reinforced by a national network of more than 900 employees offering
multidiscipline capabilities. Our teams and processes
scale quickly and move nimbly, allowing us to provide
engineering solutions that are smart, practical, efficient, and have a positive impact on cost, scope, and schedule.
Our relationships internally and across offices help us succeed, and our clients benefit from our size, extensive experience, and diversity.
Whether intricate or large-scale, Coffman provides
clients with integrated design solutions that produce
consistent and complete design packages. Regardless
of project scope, clients receive the benefit of Coffman’s multidiscipline approach, which we have utilized since 1979 to deliver workable and dependable engineering solutions.
As part of this integrated approach, Coffman brings
extensive experience supporting public safety facilities, providing fire protection engineering and life safety
services for fire stations, civic and public safety
buildings, probation and correctional facilities, and other mission-critical government projects. Our public safety experience enables us to effectively coordinate with
authorities having jurisdiction and deliver compliant,
reliable fire protection systems that support the
operational needs of emergency and public service
facilities.
xx
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
AMAN SHAH PE
Coffman Engineers | Principal
Aman’s experience in the fire protection industry includes building and fire code, and sprinkler consulting services. He is proficient in understanding and interpreting California, International, and Uniform Building and Fire Codes; Unified Facilities Criteria; and full set of NFPA Standards and Codes including NFPA 13, 14, 20, and 101 Life Safety Code. His areas of focus include public safety facilities, airports, retail centers, high-rise buildings, education and office campuses, historic structures, residential and mixed-use developments, condominiums and hotels, healthcare facilities, and correctional facilities among other project types.
PROJECT ROLE: Fire Protection Engineer
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
Ohio Street Probation Facility with Steinberg Hart 21,000 SF County of San Diego Public Health Lab with Steinberg Hart 25,740 SF North County Family Justice Center 41,000 SF
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO La Jolla, CA
T orrey Pines Fire Station 52 10,500 SF
U.S. DEPT OF THE NAVY, NAVFAC SOUTHWEST Coronado, CA
NAWS China Lake Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting Station with Steinberg Hart
20,800 SF
EDUCATION
University of Maryland
BS, Fire Protection Engineering
REGISTRATION
CA, Fire Protection, #FP1612
International Code Council (ICC) Building
Plans Examiner, #5009771-B3
XXI
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
CUMMING GROUP
Cost Estimating
Los Angeles County, Judicial Court
Oregon City Police and Municipal Courts Building
SELECT REGIONAL EXPERIENCE
Since 2018, Cumming Group has been providing extensive
owner’s representative services to the Riverside County Sheriff’s Department across various projects. These
initiatives include tenant improvements at multiple sites, removal and replacement of inmate showers, plumbing/
restroom upgrades at multiple facilities, roofing removal and replacement, and the installation of an overhead
structure at the transportation center.
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• City of Carlsbad, Public Safety & T raining Center
Renovation, Carlsbad, CA
• Univ. of Southern California, Repurpose Hoffman Bldg. for New Dept. of Public Safety, Los Angeles, CA
• City of Irvine, Public Safety Concept Study - City Hall Interior Re-Design vs. New Facility, Irvine, CA
CONTACT
Ashok Patel, MRICS
Managing Director
T (858) 217-3583
E [email protected]
15010 Avenue of Science Suite 100
San Diego, CA 92128
Cumming Management Group, Inc. (Cumming Group)
is a privately held corporation founded in California in 1996. Cumming Group is a leader in providing project
consulting services to the A/E/C industry, including cost and project management, planning and scheduling, and
construction dispute resolution. Cumming Group has
grown to more than 3,000 team members within 70+
offices globally – including many of the brightest minds in the industry. Cumming Group is passionate about helping its clients execute largescale, complex projects on-time and within budget. Services are specifically tailored to each client’s needs and add meaningful value at every step of a project’s development. Drawing on deep expertise in the communities and sectors they serve, Cumming Group
anticipates and solves problems, delivers solutions, and drives results.
For this project, Cumming Group will serve as cost
consultant. Cumming Group’s cost team is one of the
largest providers of cost estimating and management
services in the U.S., including a skilled team of in-house MEP cost specialists. Cumming Group works on more
than 400 estimates each month, delivering unparalleled
experience in this discipline. Core cost management
services include budgeting, milestone cost estimating,
value analysis, cost validation, peer review, and change order evaluation.
PROJECT EXPERIENCE – MUNICIPAL
Cumming Group’s project experience includes the
completion of assignments in support of architects,
engineers, owners, and others. Specifically, Cumming
Group has completed more than 2,100 projects for
city- and county-operated facilities. These projects have involved parks, public spaces, city halls, civic centers, police/fire facilities, libraries, offices, community
centers, animal shelters, transit centers, operations and maintenance facilities, and public works, among others.
XXII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
ASHOK PATEL MRICS
Cumming Group | Managing Director
Ashok has worked in the construction industry since 1983. He is experienced in all aspects of cost management for the civil, structural, and architectural disciplines.
Ashok’s responsibilities include all phases of estimates, quality control/quality assurance (QA/QC), and value engineering. He is involved with projects from the master plan stage through all design milestones as well as change order analysis/ negotiations. He has provided cost management services on projects ranging in value up to $1 billion. Ashok has a broad range of experience in various sectors including healthcare, science and technology, educational, civic, military, recreation, correctional, industrial, and public works
PROJECT ROLE: Principal-in-Charge
CITY OF BUENA PARK Buena Park, CA
New Police Facility
CITY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
New Fire Station No. 17 Project Size (SF)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO San Bernardino, CA
San Bernardino Co. Sheriff, New Forensic Science Lab Project Size (SF) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
Sheriff’s Stations/Substations Master Planning
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Quantity Surveying,
Greenwich University, London, UK
REGISTRATION
Chartered Member (MRICS), Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors, No.
0080274, 1988
Associate Estimating Professional
(AEP), American Society of Professional
Estimators, No. 34608254
SHAWN KOCA CPE
Firm Name | Director
Shawn has been providing cost estimating and management services across a wide variety of markets since 2007 . His close attention to detail, team-oriented approach, and understanding of construction management, in addition to cost estimation, makes him a valuable member of Cumming’s team. As a Director, Shawn is responsible for leading teams in the preparation of estimates for new construction, renovations, and repair projects from the master plan design phase up through to construction documents. He is able to deliver accurate estimates, while meeting tight deadlines and client expectations.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Manager
CITY OF CARLSBAD Carlsbad, CA
Public Safety & T raining Center Renovation
CITY OF EL CENTRO El Centro, CA
New HQ Police Station w-Support Bldg. & Parking Garage
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO San Diego, CA
SELWC with Steinberg Hart 65,000 SF
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science, Construction
Management, Illinois State University,
Normal, IL
REGISTRATION
Certified Professional Estimator (CPE),
American Society of Professional
Estimators, No. 1.4-00920-0813, 2013
XXIII
Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
GEOCON
Discipline (Subheader 1)
SELECT PUBLIC SAFETY EXPERIENCE
• INDIO PUBLIC SAFETY CAMPUS: Geocon conducted
a preliminary geotechnical investigation, geohazard
assessment, and percolation testing for the proposed
Public Safety Campus Program. The project includes a
two-story 38,000 SF police headquarters, 12,600 SF,
9,000 SF fire station dispatch center, 16,00 SF two-
story administration building, and a fire training tower, along with parking areas, access roads, utilities, and
hardscape and landscape improvements.
• EASTVALE CIVIC CENTER: Geocon conducted a
geotechnical investigation and provided testing and
observation services to support the planning and
design of Phase I of the proposed Eastvale Civic
Center. Phase I includes a three-story City Hall, a two- story Library, a two-story Police Station, a park with
a landscaped amphitheater, a plaza, and a parking
structure
• MURRIETA PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY:
Geocon performed a geotechnical investigation
for the proposed public safety training facility. The
proposed development is expected to include two story
structures, training tower, and residential building.
CONTACT
Lisa Battiato, CEG, APM, LEED AP
Title Title Title
T (951) 304 - 2300
E [email protected]
City, State Zip Code
Established in San Diego, Geocon maintains a strong
and well-distributed presence throughout Southern
California. Offices in Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County, Riverside County, and San Diego
County provide broad regional coverage, local accessibility, and the technical depth needed to support public agency projects efficiently and responsively.
Each Geocon office is supported by comprehensive
field equipment, technical libraries, and modern data
management systems to support professional services.
Geocon also operates in-house soils and materials testing laboratories accredited by the California Department of T ransportation (Caltrans), the American Association of State Highway and T ransportation Officials (AASHTO), the Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory (CCRL), and
the Division of the State Architect Laboratory Evaluation and Accreditation program.
Geocon’s managing principals are practicing professional engineers and geologists who remain actively involved in project oversight, staff mentoring, and technical review.
The average professional staff member has more than
10 years of tenure with Geocon, providing continuity,
institutional knowledge, and the ability to support
accelerated project schedules without compromising
technical quality.
Geocon’s organizational structure, statewide resources, and depth of experience, combined with a strong Southern California presence, allow the firm to deliver responsive, technically sound, and cost-effective solutions for projects of varying size and complexity.
Indio Public Safety Campus
XXIV Moreno Valley Public Safety Campus RFPSteinberg Hart
LISA BATTIATO CEG, APM, LEED, AP
Geocon West, Inc. | Regional Manager and Senior Geologist Ms. Lisa Battiato has more than 30 years of experience providing geologic consulting services throughout California. Her technical expertise includes seismic hazard analyses; subsurface fault, landslide, liquefaction, and geotechnical investigations and assessments; geologic mapping; pavement distress mitigation; geotechnical services during utility installation and roadway construction; geologic evaluations of levee stability; project management services for large, hillside grading projects; and supervision of materials testing services during construction. Ms. Battiato has been actively involved in determining methods and designs necessary for slope stabilization, seepage, mitigation of collapsible soils, induced soil settlement, expansive soils, subsurface dewatering, and drainage.
PROJECT ROLE: Project Lead and Main Point of Contact
CITY OF EASTVALE Eastvale, CA
Eastvale Civic Center 137 ,600 SF
CITY OF INDIO Indio, CA
Public Safety Campus Program 43,000 SF
CITY OF MURRIETA Murrieta, CA
Public Safety T raining Facility
EDUCATION
University of California, Riverside
BS, Geology
REGISTRATION
Certified Engineering Geologist,
CA: No. 2316
Professional Geologist,
CA: No. 7512
NEAL BERLINER, GE
Geocon West, Inc. | President and Senior Engineer
As President of Geocon West, Mr. Berliner is responsible for the management of Geocon’s technical practice in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. He began his professional career in 1992, gaining geotechnical engineering experience throughout Southern California. His experience encompasses a wide range of projects for both public and private sector clients and includes multi-story office buildings, regional shopping centers, parking structures, sound stages, studio facilities, educational facilities, mixed-use and multi-family residential developments, large-scale land developments, roadways, paving rehabilitation, bridges, pipelines, solar fields, and more.
PROJECT ROLE: President and Senior Engineer
CITY OF EASTVALE Eastvale, CA
Eastvale Civic Center 137 ,600 SF
CITY OF ANAHEIM Anaheim, CA
Fire Station 12 12,600 SF
DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES Norwalk, CA
Metro State Hospital Police Station 20,000 SF
EDUCATION
San Diego State University
BS, Civil Engineering
REGISTRATION
Geotechnical Engineer,
CA: No. 2576
Professional Engineer, Civil,
CA: No. 57123
LOS ANGELES
SAN JOSE
SAN FRANCISCO
SAN DIEGO
NEW YORK
AUSTIN
DENVER
SHANGHAI
Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
EXHI
BIT C
CI
TY - SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
TO CONSULTANT
1. Furn
ish the Consultant all in-house data which is pertinent to services to be performed by the Consultant and which is within the custody or control of the City, including, but not limited to, copies of record and off-record maps and other record and off-record property data, right -of-way maps and other right -of-way data, pending or proposed subject property land division and development application data, all newly developed and pertinent design and project specification data, and such other pertinent data which may become available to the City.
2. Provide timely review, processing, and reasonably expeditious approval of all submittals by the Consultant.
3. Provide timely City staff liaison with the Consultant when requested and when reasonably needed.
Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
EXHIBI
T D
TERMS OF PAYMENT
1. The Consultant's compensation shall not exceed $ 4, 319,611.00 .
2. The Consultant will obtain, and keep current during the term of this Agreement, the required City of Moreno Valley business license. Proof of a current City of Moreno Valley business license will be required prior to any payment s by the City. Any invoice not paid because the proof of a current City of Moreno Valley business li cense has not been provided will not incur any fees, late charges, or other penalties. Complete instructions for obtaining a City of Moreno Valley business li cense are located at: http://www.moval.org/biz-l ic.
3. The Consultant will electronically submit an invoice to the City once a month for progress payments along with documentation evidencing services completed to date. The progress payment is based on a ctual time a nd ma terials e xpended in furnishing authorized professional services during the preceding calendar month. At no time will the City pay for more services than have been satisfactorily completed and the City Engineer’s determination of the amount due for any progress payment shall be final. The consultant will submit all original invoices to Accounts Payable staff at [email protected].
Accounts Payable questions can be directed to (951) 413-3130.
3. The Consultant agrees that City payments will be received via Automated Clearing House (ACH) Direct Deposit and that the required ACH Authoriz ation form will be completed prior to any payments by the City. Any invoice not paid because the completed ACH Authorization Form has not been provided will not incur any fees, late charges, or other penalties. The ACH Authorization Form is located at:
http://www.moval.org/city_hall/forms.shtml#bf
4. The minimum information required on all invoices is:
A. Consultant Name, Mailing Address, and Phone Number
B. Invoice Date
C. Consultant Invoice Number
D. City-provided Reference Number (e.g. Project, Activity)
Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
E. Deta
iled work hours by class title (e.g. Manager, Technician, or Specialist), services performed and rates, explicit portion of a contract amount , or d etailed billing information that is sufficient to justify the invoice amount ; single, lump amounts without detail are not acceptable.
6. The City shall pay the Consultant for all invoiced, authorized professional services within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice for same.
7. Liquidated Damages for Non-Performance. The Consultant shall complete all work within the required timeframes, schedules, and performance intervals as set forth in this Agreement, the Scope of Work, or as directed by the City. If the Consultant fails to meet these performance obligations, the City may assess liquidated damages in the amount of 1% of the total contract price per working day for each working day the deficiencies remain uncorrected.
The Consultant a
cknowledges that actual damages resulting from such delays would be difficult to ascertain and agrees that this amount represents a reasonable pre -estimate of the City's costs and impacts due to non -performance. Such liquidated damages shall be deducted from progress payments. If the remaining unpaid contract price is insufficient to cover the full amount, the Consultant shall be responsible to pay the difference.
The City retains the right to issue a Change Order reducing the contract price, require acceleration of performance at the Consultant ’s expense, or pursue any other legal remedy, including collection from the Consultant, its insurance, or surety. The City shall provide written notice to the Consultant before assessing liquidated damages. Liquidated damages shall not be assessed for delays caused by the City or circumstances beyond the Consultant’s reasonable control.
Neither the City's failure nor delay in deducting liquidated damages from payments due to the Consultant, nor City's failure or delay in notifying Consultant of the accrued liquidated damages, shall be deemed a waiver of City's right to enforce this section. The imposition of liquidated damages shall not limit City's ability to seek additional remedies for Consultant default, including termination of this Agreement if non-performance persists.
8. Consultant Compensation and Rate Adjustment. Consutlant ’s compensation, including all contracted hourly rates, is fixed for the Term of this Agreement, and no automatic or scheduled
Public Works Revised: 7-31-25
inc
reases shall apply except those expressly incorporated herein. If the Consultant makes its performance contingent upon a rate increase, the Consultant commits a material breach, which may result in contract enforcement actions. Pricing for extended terms is subject to negotiation.
No rate increase shall take effect unless it is expressly provided herein or approved in writing by the City and executed through a contract amendment.
50 West San Fernando #850
San Jose, CA 95113
PMB #5041
2301 Blake Street #100
Denver, CO 80205
98 Battery Street #300
San Francisco CA 94111
805 Brazos Street
Austin TX 78701
90 Broad Street #1803
New Y ork NY 10004
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1150
San Diego, CA 92101
655 W. Broadway, Suite 1150
San Diego, CA 92101
February 24, 2026 (Revised 2/24/26)
Capital Projects Division
[email protected]
(951) 413-3130
Re: Mor eno Valley Public Safety Campus, P roject No. 80 3 0072 Dear Selection Committee,
We appreciate the opportunity to partner with the City of Mor eno Valley on the Public Safety Campus and are excited about supporting this important investment in the City’s long-term public safety infrastructure.
The Scope of Services anticipates delivery of a joint-use Police and Fire facility that supports 24-hour operations, s ecure environments, shar ed functions, sit e development, sus tainability, r esiliency, and future flexibility. As outlined in the RF P, the detailed space program, oper ational adjacencies, and final facility size will be confirmed throug h the Site Evaluation & Master Planning and Space Programming phases.
Our proposed staff ing and fee structure reflect the level of coordination, document ation, and interdisciplinary integration required to deliver a high-performing public safety facility. We understand that this campus is intended to support continued g rowth in the eastern portion of the City and to complement existing facilities, with a development approach that emphasizes efficient building area, surf ace parking, and practical site infrastructure. As the program and site strategy are refined, w e will align subsequent design phases to the confirme d scope, ensuring that resources are appropriately scaled to the City’s defined objectives.
Our intent is to work collaboratively with the City to deliver a thoughtful, e fficient, and durable public safety facility that
meets operational needs while exercising fiscal responsibility. We are committed to transparency, r esponsiveness, and disciplined execution as the Project advances.
We look forward to the opportunity to contribute our experience in delivering public safety facilities to the City of Moreno Valley.
Respectfully,
V
incent Mudd, GC
Managing Partner
619 728 9382 / [email protected]
Additional services shall only be performed upon written authorization from the City.
ASSUMPTIONS
A. Assumes an overall construction budget will be confirmed by the City prior to completion of SD.
B. Assumes program size and building area approved at Programming will be the basis for subsequent phase fees.
C. Significant increases in square footage (beyond ±5%) after City approval constitute Additional Services.
D. Assumes authorization to proceed by phase
E. Assumes geotechnical report, survey, hydrology, and utility information provided by others are accurate.
F. Redesign due to unforeseen subsurface conditions is Additional Services.
G. Assumes off-site roadway, signalization, utility upgrades, or agency-driven improvements are limited to those identified during initial site evaluation.
H. Assumes the City is the Lead Agency for CEQA.
I. Assumes timely review by City, Fire Marshal, Building, utilities, and outside agencies.
J. Redesign due to changes in agency interpretation after prior approvals is Additional Services.
K. Assumes a construction duration consistent with the published schedule.
L. Extended construction duration beyond 2 months constitutes Additional Services.
M. Assumes a single bid phase.
N. Re-bidding due to budget shortfall or contractor withdrawal is Additional Services.
O. Assumes record drawings based on contractor-marked redlines.
P. Assumes no grant-writing, FEMA funding support, or federal reimbursement documentation unless specifically authorized.
Q. The environmental and technical study process will be initiated with receipt of 60 percent plans.
R. This scope of work assumes negative findings for cultural resources. Positive findings will require a budget augment.
S. This scope of work assumes no substantive changes to the Project description will occur after the City authorizes work to begin. Should changes occur after this point, certain analyses may require revision and a budget augment may be required.
T. This scope of work assumes that the Project will be processed pursuant to an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The scope of work and fee estimate provided herein are based on the assumption that all potentially significant environmental impacts can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level through feasible mitigation measures. In the event the IS identifies a significant and unavoidable impact, or if the City determines that preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required, such work shall constitute additional services and will be addressed through a separate scope of work, schedule, and fee amendment subject to City authorization.
U. We will be provided with access to the boring locations and perform the fieldwork within the site during regular business hours from 7 am to 5 pm Monday through Friday, and no night or weekend work will be required.
V. The vegetation at the site will be mowed prior to geotechnical field work to reduce the fire hazard and provide a safe working environment.
W. The building footprint locations will be provided prior to geotechnical field work. If the building locations or sizes change, requiring additional borings to comply with Note 48, the additional borings will be performed at an additional cost to this estimate.
X. If the Client cancels or postpones scheduled geotechnical subcontractor services within 48 hours of the planned date of activities, the project will be invoiced for cancellation fees charged by the geotechnical subcontractor.
Y. All existing subsurface utilities, wells, and septic tanks/leach lines will be clearly marked on a plan provided to us prior to our geotechnical field work.
Z. We have assumed standard spread footing and slab-on-grade foundations. Deep foundations or mat foundations, if needed, would require an additional design fee.
AA. This fee is based on a single permit for the primary structure.
BB. In-person meetings: We have assumed 5 in-person meetings in Moreno Valley, all other meetings assumed to be conducted virtually.
CC. The City of Moreno Valley is the AHJ and no other agencies will be involved in the structural review.
DD. Commissioning of Communications and security infrastructure and Low-voltage specialty systems is excluded (can be added as an optional fee upon request)
EE. Commissioning of Fire Alarm, Fire Protection and any other life safety system is excluded (can be added as an optional fee upon request)
FF. Commissioning of EV Charging is excluded (can be added as an optional fee upon request) GG. Title 24 Acceptance T esting and forms and documentation is excluded (assumed to be managed and completed by installing contractors)
EXCLUSIONS
1. Insurance requirements above our base policy
2. Reproduction of bid documents
3. Changes to drawings or specifications after completion of the “Construction Document” phase
4. Life cycle cost analysis (LCCA)
5. LEED certification documentation or sustainability certification
6. Hazardous materials investigation, remediation design, or environmental testing beyond standard MEP system coordination
7. Commissioning of the systems
8. Structural support or calculations for any electrical equipment
9. Design of any Fire T raining T owers, PD T raining Props etc.
10. Design of sewer systems, lift stations, pump stations, septic, etc.
11. Design of Vendor provided systems
12. Design of Electric PD or FD vehicles
13. Design of leased telecom infrastructure
14. Design of any indoor ordinance storage or disposal
15. Design of any indoor shooting ranges
16. Design of any long-term detention facilities
17. Any permitting fees or traffic control required for surveying or other services are
18. not included in this fee proposal. T raffic control shall be provided by client if needed.
19. Supplement T opographic Design surveys and mapping shall be excluded from this proposal.
20. Subsurface utility investigation research and mapping shall be excluded from this proposal.
21. Cost studies/estimates for design alternates and options, these will be considered an added service
22. Cost Estimating Value Engineering Studies (to bring the project back to budget if required).
23. Estimation of Soft costs including owner contingency, owner soft cost management, owners’ equipment including FF&E, equipment, move management/temporary relocation, etc.
24. Cost management services at bidding and construction phases.
25. Atrium smoke control design (if applicable).
26. Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) analysis.
27. Compliance with State Fire Marshal as AHJ.
28. Reclaimed water is not anticipated at the site and associated DEH processing is not included.
29. Wayfinding and signage excluded.
30. Additional submittals not specifically outlined in this scope of work will be considered additional services.
31. Water feature design is excluded.
32. We anticipate the Structured Cabling Systems and Electronic Security Systems will bid with the base building and the Audiovisual Systems will bid separately during construction.
33. If the project is placed on hold for longer than six months, we may request a remobilization fee upon the project’s restart.
34. Deep foundations
35. Solar canopy structures
36. Performance Based Design
37. Alternative technology such as Base Isolation or Damping
38. Hazardous materials discovery is excluded.
39. Major off-site infrastructure design beyond conceptual identification is excluded unless specifically authorized.
40. Preparation of full EIR, mitigation monitoring programs, or litigation support is excluded.
41. Design of future expansion buildings excluded.
42. Assumes FFE programming coordination only. Procurement, bidding, installation management for FF&E excluded. 120-weeks 4-weeks 4-weeks 52-weeks 8-weeks 12-weeks 16-Weeks 16-Weeks 100-weeks 2-weeks
FEES BY DISCIPLINE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
NTE FEE FOR ALL PHASES BY
CONSULTANT REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES* TOTALFEE BY
CONSULTANT
ARCHITECTURAL
Steinberg Hart 250,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 325,000.00 $ 575,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 2,050,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 2,105,000.00$ STEINBERG HART SUBTOTAL 250,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 220,000.00 $ 325,000.00 $ 575,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 400,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 2,050,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 2,105,000.00$
CONSULTANT FEES
PUBLIC SAFETY SPECIALIST
Roth Sheppard 17,340.00 $ 52,021.00 $ 60,691.00 $ 8,670.00 $ 86,701.00 $ 78,031.00 $ 34,680.00 $ 8,670.00 $ 65,026.00 $ 8,670.00 $ 420,500.00 $ - $ 420,500.00$
CIVIL, LAND SURVEYOR, CEQA
PSOMAS - CIVIL + LAND SURVEYOR - $ 74,477.00 $ 14,282.00 $ - $ 60,729.00 $ 95,703.00 $ 135,921.00 $ 9,841.00 $ 40,382.00 $ 14,487.00 $ 445,822.00 $ 17,276.00 $ 463,098.00$
LANDSCAPE
Schmidt Design Group 19,210.00 $ 21,200.00 $ - $ 4,910.00 $ 18,480.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 55,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 26,430.00 $ 6,970.00 $ 187,200.00 $ - $ 187,200.00$
STRUCTURAL
KPFF - $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 17,000.00 $ 28,000.00 $ 58,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 151,200.00 $ - $ 151,200.00$
MEP ENGINEERING
ELEN Consulting 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ - $ - $ 40,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 18,300.00 $ 295,300.00 $ - $ 295,300.00$
FIRE CODE / LIFE SAFETY
Coffman 411.00 $ 3,575.00 $ 1,066.00 $ - $ 4,263.00 $ 2,887.00 $ 4,263.00 $ 1,410.00 $ 2,132.00 $ - $ 20,007.00 $ - $ 20,007.00$
DATA / TELECOM / SECURITY
NV5 - $ - $ 18,593.00 $ - $ 23,241.00 $ 46,482.00 $ 55,779.00 $ 2,231.00 $ 37,186.00 $ 1,487.00 $ 184,999.00 $ - $ 184,999.00$
ACOUSTICS
RWDI - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,781.00 $ 15,508.00 $ 20,827.00 $ - $ 15,864.00 $ - $ 59,980.00 $ - $ 59,980.00$
COST ESTIMATING
Cumming Group - $ - $ 20,000.00 $ - $ 25,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 115,000.00 $ - $ 115,000.00$
GEOTECHNICAL
Geocon - $ 33,340.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 4,280.00 $ 1,240.00 $ - $ 3,100.00 $ - $ 41,960.00 $ - $ 41,960.00$
ENVIRONMENTAL
PSOMAS -CEQA - $ - $ - $ 160,514.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 160,514.00 $ 30,653.00 $ 191,167.00$
COMMISSIONING
GMC Commissioning Inc 6,325.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,100.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 2,475.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 64,675.00 $ 6,325.00 $ 84,200.00 $ - $ 84,200.00$ CONSULTANT SUBTOTAL 48,286.00 $ 197,513.00 $ 117,532.00 $ 176,994.00 $ 284,295.00 $ 393,091.00 $ 503,185.00 $ 49,752.00 $ 334,795.00 $ 61,239.00 $ 2,166,682.00$ 47,929.00$ 2,214,611.00$ LUMP SUM FEE BY PHASE 298,286.00 $ 237,513.00 $ 157,532.00 $ 261,994.00 $ 504,295.00 $ 718,091.00 $ 1,078,185.00 $ 119,752.00 $ 734,795.00 $ 106,239.00 $ 4,216,682.00 $ 102,929.00 $ TOTAL NOT-TO-EXCEED CONTRACT AMOUNT 4,319,611.00 $
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Project Director / PIC 300.00 $ 60 8 20 60 16 24 32 10 40 5 275 Project Manager / Associate Principal 275.00 $ 850 40 20 156 100 320 360 80 300 60 2286 Design Director / Principal 300.00 $ 0 40 20 0 100 80 20 0 0 0 260 Project Architect / Associate Principal 255.00 $ 0 20 20 40 320 320 720 140 0 0 1580 SD/DD/ CD/Job Captain 200.00 $ 0 0 0 0 100 320 720 0 0 0 1140 SD/DD/CD / Designer 130.00 $ 0 80 80 100 320 320 720 0 0 0 1620 Sutsainability / Associate Principal 235.00 $ 0 20 20 20 20 40 20 0 30 40 210 QA/QC / Partner 275.00 $ 0 0 0 0 25 40 80 0 80 0 225 Construction Contract Admin / Job Captain 200.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 50 1450 Lead Planner 300.00 $ 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 CA Admin / 150.00 $ 40 0 0 0 60 40 140 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 950 248 180 376 1001 1464 2672 230 1910 195 9226
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 9226
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
STEINBERG HART
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Environmental - Principal in Charge 280.00 $ 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Environmental - Senior Project Manager 265.00 $ 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 Environmental - Deputy Project Manager 180.00 $ 0 0 0 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 Environmental - Assistant Project Manager 160.00 $ 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 Environmental - Senior Tech Specialist - Noise 245.00 $ 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Environmental - Analyst 140.00 $ 0 0 0 58 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 Environmental - Cultural Resource Manager 220.00 $ 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Environmental - Senior Archeologist 200.00 $ 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Environmental - Field Staff 115.00 $ 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Environmental - RM/Biologist 170.00 $ 0 0 0 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 Environmental - Biologist 137.00 $ 0 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 Environmental - Botanist 150.00 $ 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Environmental - Tech Editor 100.00 $ 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Environmental - Word Processor 145.00 $ 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Environmental - GIS 144.00 $ 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 0 0 0 918 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 918
ENVIRONMENTAL
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Partner/Principal-in-Charge 285.00 $ 12 72 82 8 110 70 20 8 20 12 414 Craft Studio Director/QA/QC 272.00 $ 0 4 4 0 40 45 30 2 8 0 133 Creative Studio Director/Public Safety Specialist 246.00 $ 64 96 125 16 240 120 60 16 30 20 787 Craft Studio Architect II/Project Architect 178.00 $ 4 80 84 16 295 120 100 8 40 4 751 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 80 252 295 40 685 355 210 34 98 36
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 2085
Roth Sheppard
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Civil - Principal in Charge 265.00 $ 0 14 20 0 8 8 8 6 10 10 84 Civil - Senior Project Manager 255.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 10 22 Civil - Technical Manager 230.00 $ 0 16 0 0 12 32 32 10 40 20 162 Civil - Project Manager 225.00 $ 0 72 20 0 84 126 184 20 70 10 586 Civil - Assistant Project Manager 200.00 $ 0 0 20 0 0 0 20 0 0 10 50 Civil - Project Engineer 180.00 $ 0 114 20 0 86 170 236 20 120 20 786 Civil - Designer 3 160.00 $ 0 64 0 0 128 212 272 0 0 0 676 Civil - Designer 2 145.00 $ 0 18 0 0 50 50 76 0 0 0 194 Civil - Designer 1 140.00 $ 0 10 0 0 50 50 76 0 0 0 186 Survey - Project Manager 250.00 $ 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Survey - Project Surveyor 210.00 $ 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 Survey - Technician 170.00 $ 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 Survey - Two Person Crew 400.00 $ 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 0 473 80 0 418 648 916 56 240 80
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 2911
CIVIL + LAND SURVEY
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
PRINCIPAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / PRESIDENT 305.00 $ 18 8 0 2 12 4 12 2 4 2 64 PRINCIPAL LANDCAPE ARCHITECT / PARTNER 270.00 $ 4 2 0 2 0 2 20 8 20 2 60 0 SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER 170.00 $ 24 18 0 8 16 35 60 12 45 6 224 0 PROJECT MANAGER 160.00 $ 50 32 0 8 25 40 80 20 55 16 326 0 SENIOR LANDSCAPE DESIGNER 140.00 $ 4 36 0 8 40 70 160 40 24 16 398 0 LANDSCAPE DESIGNER 125.00 $ 0 40 0 0 20 80 200 40 0 0 380 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 100 136 0 28 113 231 532 122 148 42
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 1452
LANDSCAPE
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
STRUCTURAL/PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE 310.00 $ 0 9 9 9 40 40 60 0 10 0 177 STRUCTURAL/SENIOR PROJECT MANAGER 250.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STRUCTURAL/PROJECT MANAGER 230.00 $ 0 0 0 0 40 80 150 20 50 30 370 STRUCTURAL/PROJECT ENGINEER 195.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 40 120 20 110 0 290 STRUCTURAL/DESIGN ENGINEER 180.00 $ 0 0 0 0 10 80 120 0 100 0 310 STRUCTURAL/LEAD MODELER 205.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 STRUCTURAL/MODELER 180.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 50 100 0 25 0 175 STRUCTURAL/ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT 125.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 0 9 9 9 90 290 550 40 295 30
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 1322
STRUCTURAL
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE 270.00 $ 30 30 0 0 125 185 185 15 45 15 630 PROJECT ENGINEER 190.00 $ 310 185 0 0 250 530 530 45 250 45 2145 DESIGNER 110.00 $ 30 15 0 0 515 1135 1135 45 125 45 3045 ADMIN 80.00 $ 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
- $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 400 230 0 0 890 1850 1850 105 420 105
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 5850
MEP
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Principal 290.00 $ 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Senior Engineer 247.00 $ 1 8 2 0 8 8 8 2 4 0 41 Engineer 3 225.00 $ 12 4 0 16 8 16 6 8 0 70 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 2 20 6 0 24 16 24 8 12 0
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 112
FIRE CODE LIFE SAFETY
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
NV5 Principal 265.00 $ 0 0 14 0 13 22 18 0 8 0 75 NV5 Project Consultant 205.00 $ 0 0 43 0 68 81 92 5 80 2 371 NV5 AV Designer 205.00 $ 0 0 13 0 23 82 168 3 68 2 359 NV5 IT Designer 205.00 $ 0 0 24 0 28 65 79 2 30 2 230 NV5 Security Designer 205.00 $ 0 0 18 0 21 49 59 1 24 2 174 NV5 BIM/CAD 115.00 $ 0 0 0 0 10 54 68 0 8 8 148 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 0 0 112 0 163 353 484 11 218 16
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 1357
DATA TELECOM SECURITY
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Project Manager 175.00 $ 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 6 Project Coordinator 140.00 $ 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 7 Technical Director 300.00 $ 0 0 0 0 12 24 24 8 0 0 68 Specialist Engineer/Scientist 210.00 $ 0 0 0 0 26 56 88 84 0 0 254 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 0 0 0 0 43 84 116 92 0 0
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 335
ACOUSTICS
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Director Cost Management 335.00 $ 0 0 8 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 56 Associate Director, Cost Management 260.00 $ 0 0 16 0 24 24 16 0 0 0 80 Senior Cost Manager 225.00 $ 0 0 45 0 72 78 69 0 0 0 264 Senior Cost Manager, MEP 225.00 $ 0 0 16 0 42 72 48 0 0 0 178 Cost Manager 200.00 $ 0 0 0 0 64 80 60 0 0 0 204 Kick-off Meeting with Design Team - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 0 0 85 0 218 270 209 0 0 0
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 782
COST ESTIMATOR
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Staff Geo/Eng 135.00 $ 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Staff Geo/Eng - PW 190.00 $ 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Staff Geo/Eng - PW OT 285.00 $ 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Project Engineer 155.00 $ 0 16 0 0 0 20 8 0 20 0 64 Sr Geo/Eng 190.00 $ 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 8 Admin/Drafting/WP 105.00 $ 0 16 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 20 Laboratory Testing 500.00 $ 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Subcontractor (Drilling) 10,350.00 $ 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Geophysics 5,000.00 $ 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 0 86 0 0 0 28 8 0 20 0
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 142
GEOTECHNICAL
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE HOULY BILLING RATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT &
COORDINATION
SITE EVALUATION &
MASTER PLANNING SPACE PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL &
ENTITLEMENT SUPPORT SCHEMATIC DESIGN DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS
PERMITTING & BIDDING
SUPPORT
CONSTRUCTION
ADMINISTRATION PROJECT CLOSEOUT
TOTAL ESTIMATED
HOURS FOR
CATEGORY/TITLE
Principal 275.00 $ 2 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 2 2 11 Director 225.00 $ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 Project Manager 175.00 $ 15 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 20 5 48 Cx Authority 150.00 $ 2 0 0 0 2 4 4 2 35 6 55 Cx Associate 120.00 $ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 6 48 Admin 100.00 $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 12 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LABOR CATEGORY/TITLE - $ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL ESTIMATED HOURS BY PHASE 23 0 0 0 4 8 9 4 107 23
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT
HOURS 178
COMMISSIONING
ESTIMATED HOURS PER PHASE BY BILLING CATEGORY