Report to City Council
ID: 26-0193 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Felicia London, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer
AGENDA DATE: May 19, 2026
TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING TO CONFIRM A DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENTS FOR LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 2014 -01 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27
(RESO. NO. CSD 2026 -XX) (REPORT OF: FINANCIAL
AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES) ( DISTRICT: ALL
DISTRICTS)
TITLE SUMMARY: Public Hearing for Lighting Maintenance District No. 2014 - 01 for FY 2026/27 Proposed Levy of Real Property
Assessments
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the CSD:
1. Conduct the Public Hearing on the proposed levy of real property assessments for Moreno Valley Community Services District Lighting Maintenance District No. 2014-01.
2. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2026-XX, a Resolution of the Board for the Moreno Valley Community Services District of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Confirming a Diagram and Assessments for Fiscal Year 2026/27 in Connection wit h Moreno Valley Community Services District Lighting Maintenance District No. 2014-01.
3. Authorize the Chief Financial Officer to adjust the proposed assessments in the event there are any parcel changes, clerical errors, or other adjustments as may be necessary
ID: 26-0193 Page 2
between the date the assessments were calculated and the date the fixed charges are submitted to the County of Riverside, provided the applied assessments do not exceed the maximum assessments and are in compliance with the formation documents for the district.
SUMMARY
This report recommends the Board of the Moreno Valley Community Services District (“CSD Board”) conduct a Public Hearing and consider adoption of the resolution (Attachment 1), which confirms the diagram (i.e. map) and authorizes the levy of assessments on the fiscal year (FY) 2026/27 property tax roll for Moreno Valley Community Services District Lighting Maintenance District No. 2014-01 (“LMD No. 2014- 01” or “District”). This is a routine process that occurs each year.
The proposed assessments are a continuation of the real property assessments currently levied on the property tax bills. There are no increases proposed to the assessments other than an annual inflationary adjustment, provided the property owners previou sly approved such adjustment. Revenue received from the assessment funds, in part, the street lighting services provided by the District.
The Finance Subcommittee received an update on the annual inflationary adjustment process that will be applied to the maximum assessment rates, if previously authorized by the property owners, at its April 28, 2026, meeting.
DISCUSSION
On May 27, 2014, the CSD adopted its Resolution No. CSD 2014 -08, establishing LMD No. 2014-01 (formerly Zone B, residential street lighting). Property owners of benefiting parcels within the District pay a special assessment, which is levied on their annual property tax bill, to fund the cost of operating the residential street lighting program (i.e.
Special Benefit). Revenue received from the assessment funds a majority of the Special Benefit costs, as defined in the Assessment Engineer’s Report (“Report”) (Attachment 2), to maintain, service, and operate street lights located within the District. The Report is also available from the City Clerk’s office and accessible from the City’s website (www.moval.org/sd).
Each year, the CSD Board must initiate proceedings and conduct a Public Hearing (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) to receive public input on the proposed levy. The assessments cannot be levied on the property tax roll, nor can an adjustment be made to the assessment unless the property owners previously approved and the CSD Board annually authorizes such actions. Approval of the resolution confirms the map and the maximum and applied assessments. The resolution also authorizes the County to levy the assessments on the FY 2026/27 property tax roll.
On March 17, 2026, the CSD Board adopted resolutions to initiate the annual proceedings for the FY 2026/27 levy and approved the Report. The Report includes a description of the improvements within the District, the estimated annual expenses, the method of
ID: 26-0193 Page 3
assessment apportionment for each lot or parcel within the District boundaries, and a diagram showing the parcels within the zones that make up the District.
The Report also provides an analysis of the District’s annual financial status. It separates and apportions the cost of General Benefit, as defined in the Report, and the cost of Special Benefit (i.e. funded by the assessment) of the street lighting services to the benefiting properties. The General Fund is also programmed to cover additional costs, aside from the cost of General Benefit, which are outlined in the Fiscal Impact section of this report.
The maximum assessment rate is the maximum amount that can be used to calculate the assessment levied on the property tax roll. If the property owners previously approved an annual inflationary adjustment, the Report recommends adjusting the maximum rates by the adjustment. Zone 02 has a property owner approved adjustment.
The applied assessment rate is the amount that is used to calculate the assessment actually levied on the property tax roll. The applied assessment is the amount necessary to fund the services of the District for the upcoming fiscal year. The applied assessment rate cannot exceed the maximum assessment rate. The assessment is calculated by applying the rate on an equivalent benefit unit basis, as defined in the Report, of those parcels in the zone. The proposed maximum and applied assessments, by parcel, are included in the Report.
Conflict of Interest Analysis
Section 18702.2 of the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Regulations provides that if a Council Member has a financial interest in a parcel of land (other than a leasehold interest) within any of the subject assessment districts, the Council Member must recuse him or herself from voting on any proposal that would impose, repeal, or modify any taxes, fees, or assessments that apply to the parcel owned by the Council Member. Although there is an exception, the City Attorney recommends that in the abundance of caution, that if any Council Member who owns real property within any of the districts affected by the recommended assessment, that they should consider recusing themselves. If necessary, the Rule of Necessity may be implemented in the event we lose a quorum to vote on any of th e assessments. The Rule of Necessity allows the City Council to randomly select which Council Members are allowed to participate in the decision regarding the assessments even if they have a potential conflict of interest based on property ownership within the respective district.
ALTERNATIVES
1. Conduct the Public Hearing and approve the recommended actions as presented.
Staff recommends this alternative, as it is consistent with the 1972 Act and will allow for collection of revenue necessary to support the services the District was created to provide. Th is alternative will avoid additional burdens to the General Fund to provide the services.
ID: 26-0193 Page 4
2. Conduct the Public Hearing and do not approve the recommended actions as presented. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it may prevent the City from levying the FY 2026/27 assessments and collecting the funding to support the services of the District as requested by the property owners. Selection of this alternative will require additional contributions from the General Fund.
3. Open the Public Hearing but continue consideration of the remaining recommendations to a future CSD Board meeting. Staff does not recommend this alternative as it may prevent the City from meeting the County’s deadline to include the assessments on the FY 2026/27 property tax roll.
FISCAL IMPACT
Property owners pay the LMD No. 2014 -01 assessment as part of their annual property tax bill. The assessment, including an inflationary adjustment where applicable, has been approved by the prop erty owners through prior proceedings. Funds received for the benefit of the District are restricted and can only be used to fund the services of the District. The recommended assessment rates for FY 2026/27 are listed in the table below.
Parcel specific d etail of the proposed maximum and applied assessment is included in the Report as attached and is also available from the City Clerk’s office and accessible from the City’s Website (www.moval.org/sd).
For FY 2026 /27, property assessments are projected to generate $1,028,553.58 in revenue. The projected expenditures for the District are $1,658,819.00. Other revenue sources to the District (e.g., property tax revenues, advanced energy fees for new installations, etc.), and contributions from the General Fund are programmed to fund the difference between the projected assessment revenue and expenditures.
The City’s FY 2026/27 Adopted Operating Budget includes a total General Fund contribution of $425,465.42. This inc ludes the required General Benefit cost and a General Fund subsidy, which are detailed below:
Zone # of EBUs1 Maximum Applied2 Maximum Applied2
Adjustment to
Maximum
Change in
Applied
Assessment
Revenue5
Zone 013
32,881 $ 23.00 $ 23.00 $ 23.00 $ 23.00 0.00% $ - $ 756,270.36 Zone 024
7,243 $ 36.31 $ 36.46 $ 37.56 $ 37.56 3.01% $ 1.10 $ 271,893.22 Zone 033
65 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 $ 6.00 0.00% $ - $ 390.00 Total Projected Assessment Revenue $ 1,028,553.58
LMD 2014-01 Assessment Rates
(Residential Street Lighting)
FY 2025/26 Proposed FY 2026/27
5 Total of proposed levy differs from calculation of EBUs and rate shown due to rounding. 1 Equivalent Benefit Units. An EBU is equivalent to a single-family residential (SFR) parcel. 2 Rounded down. Riverside County requires even numbered dollar amounts to be applied to the property tax roll. 3 Property owners have not approved an annual inflationary adjustment. 4 Property owner approved inflationary adjustment to max rate based on percentage change calculated for the prior year in the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim Regional Consumer Price Index, as published by the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (index approved by property owners).
ID: 26-0193 Page 5
Third-party costs associated with the annual levy approval process and preparation of the reports for LMD No. 2014-01 are projected not to exceed $5,000.00. Third-party services include a consultant assessment engineer, special legal counsel, and publication of a legal notice. These costs are included in the City’s FY 2026/27 Adopted Operating Budget for LMD No. 2014-01 (Fund 5012).
NOTIFICATION
The Public Hearing notice was published in The Press -Enterprise on Thursday, May 7, 2026, in compliance with Streets & Highways Code Section 22626.
PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:
Valerie Arenas Rey Felicia London
Special Districts Division Manager Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer
Concurred By:
Patty Yhuit
Deputy Finance Director (Operations)
CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness: Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.
Revenue Diversification and Preservation: Develop a variety of City revenue sources and policies to create a stable revenue base and fiscal policies to support essential City services, regardless of economic climate.
CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1. Economic Development
2. Public Safety
3. Library
4. Infrastructure
5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life
6. Youth Programs
Type Description Amount
General Benefit Cost
As defined in the Report, represents costs which are not allowed to be assessed to properties and therefore, are apportioned to the General Fund.The General Benefit is the benefit the public receives from the public street lighting improvements in the District. 33,180.00$
Additional Agency
Contribution1
Funds the shortfall between revenues and expenditures to continue operating the street lighting program. 392,285.42$
425,465.42$
General Fund Costs
Total
1 Projected contribution included in proposed Operating Budget. The actual contribution may be lower than needed to cover expenses. In the event additional amounts are needed, a budget adjustment will be requested.
ID: 26-0193 Page 6
Objective 4.2: Develop and maintain a comprehensive Infrastructure Plan to invest in and deliver City infrastructure.
Objective 5.2: Promote the installation and maintenance of cost effective, low maintenance landscape, hardscape and other improvements which create a clean, inviting community.
ID: 26-0193 Page 7
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_FMS_SD_PUBLIC HEARING FOR LMD 2014-01_05.19.26.docx
Attachments: - Resolution Confirming Assessments for LMD 2014-01.docx - FY 2026-27 LMD 2014-01 Engineer's Report_Signed.pdf
Final Approval Date: May 13, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:
No Signature found
Valerie Arenas Rey
No Signature found
Patty Yhuit
Natalia Medina
Felicia London, MPA
No Signature - Task assigned to Launa Jimenez was completed by assistant Angel Galache
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez