Moreno Valley City Council
September 1, 2026

CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE

LOS ANGELES

PALM SPRINGS

POINT RICHMOND

RIVERSIDE

ROSEVILLE

SAN LUIS OBISPO
3210 El Camino Real, Suite 100, Irvine, California 92602 949.553.0666 www.lsa.net

MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 7, 2025
TO: Cherry Miao, Public Storage
FROM: Jessica Coria, Associate
Bianca Martinez, Air Quality Specialist
SUBJECT: Draft Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Technical Memorandum for the Proposed Moreno Valley Public Storage Project in Moreno Valley, California

INTRODUCTION
LSA has prepared this Air Quality, Energy, and Greenhouse Gas Technical Memorandum to evaluate the impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Moreno Valley Public Storage Project (project) located in Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. This analysis was prepared using methods and assumptions recommended in the air quality impact assessment guidelines of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993)1 and associated updates. This analysis includes an assessment of criteria pollutant emissions, an assessment of carbon monoxide (CO) hot-spot impacts, and an assessment of the project’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The 3-acre project site (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 482-190-022) is located along Indian Street, north of Alessandro Boulevard in the City of Moreno Valley (City). The project site is currently undeveloped and generally flat. Vehicular access to the project site is provided via an existing driveway along Indian Street that is shared with commercial uses to the south of the site. Local access to the project site is provided via Indian Street. The project location is shown on Figure 1 and the project conceptual site plan is shown on Figure 2 (all figures are included in Attachment A).

The proposed project includes development of a 132,003-square-foot, three-story, self-storage building, including a self-storage area, a rental office, and a lobby, with 20,777 square-feet of landscaping. The on-site rental office would be located in the southeastern corner of the building.

The proposed project would include a recreational vehicle (RV) parking lot consisting of 52 RV spaces. In addition, 12 passenger vehicle parking spaces, including one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant space, and six bicycle parking spaces would be provided adjacent to the east of the proposed self-storage building. The project would also include installation of landscaping and

1 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook (currently under revision). Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis- handbook/ceqa-air-quality-handbook-(1993) (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 2 trees along the project site frontage of Indian Street, as well as landscaping along the project site setbacks to the north, east, and south. Additionally, the building would be all electric and would not include natural gas connections.

According to the City’s zoning map and the City’s General Plan, the project site is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and has a land use designation of Commercial. Per City Municipal Code Permitted Uses Table 9.02.020-1 in Section 9.02.020,2 self-storage facilities are not permitted uses in the NC zone, so the project includes a zone change to change the zoning designation of the project site from NC to Community Commercial (CC) and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow development of the proposed project within the CC zone.

Once operational the proposed project would generate approximately 216 average daily trips.3 Operational office hours would be 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., 7 days a week. Customer access hours would be 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. The proposed project would include up to two employees per shift to operate the facility.4
Construction would occur for approximately 12 months, ending in the second quarter of 2027.

Construction activities would include site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities. Site preparation, grading, and paving activities would involve the use of standard earthmoving equipment such as large excavators, cranes, and other related equipment.

In addition, the proposed project would require approximately 4,210 cubic yards of soil export.5

SENSITIVE RECEPTORS IN THE PROJECT AREA
For this analysis, sensitive receptors are considered areas of the population that have an increased sensitivity to air pollution or environmental contaminants. Sensitive receptor locations include residences, schools, daycare centers, hospitals, parks, and similar uses that are sensitive to air quality. Impacts on sensitive receptors are of particular concern because those receptors are the population that is most vulnerable to the effects of air pollution. The project site is bounded by self- storage uses to the north, residential uses to the east, commercial uses (gasoline station and auto parts store) to the south, and Indian Street and commercial/retail uses to the west. The nearest sensitive receptors are the single-family residences along Pheasant Knoll Lane that are located to

2 City of Moreno Valley. 2024. Permitted Uses Table 9.02.020-1. Website: https://ecode360.com/ attachment/MO4973/MO4973-009a%20Permitted%20Uses%20Table%209.02.020-1.pdf (accessed March 2025).
3 LSA. 2024. Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis for the Public Storage Moreno Valley Project (LSA Project No. 20241908). October 16.
4 Assumes up to two shifts per day.
5 The California Emissions Estimator Model version 2022.1 (CalEEMod) model evaluated the project emissions assuming construction would begin in November 2025 and end in November 2026 and require approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil export. The project schedule and grading plans have since been modified to assume construction would end in the second quarter of 2027 and approximately 4,210 cubic yards of soil export would be required. The 12-month construction duration remained the same. These modifications to the project have been reviewed by LSA and it was determined that the modified construction schedule and soil export quantities would not result in more severe impacts than what is described within.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 3 the east and within 50 feet of the project site (measured from the project site boundary to the center of the nearest residence).

Table A shows the summary of the distances to the nearby sensitive receptors based on the project activity.

Table A: Summary of Analysis Distances by Impact Category Activity Nearest Sensitive
Receptor Points of Analysis Distance
(feet)
Construction1 Single-family homes on
Pheasant Knoll Lane
Perimeter of construction activities to the
centroid of the nearest sensitive receptor.
50 Operations Single-family homes on
Pheasant Knoll Lane
Emissions sources on-site are generalized from
the centroid of the project site to the centroid
of the nearest sensitive receptor.
210
Source: Compiled by LSA (March 2025)

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Air Quality Background
Air quality is primarily a function of local climate, local sources of air pollution, and regional pollution transport. The amount of a given pollutant in the atmosphere is determined by the amount of the pollutant released and the atmosphere’s ability to transport and dilute the pollutant.

The major determinants of transport and dilution are wind, atmospheric stability, terrain and, for photochemical pollutants, sunshine.

A region’s topographic features have a direct correlation with air pollution flow and therefore are used to determine the boundary of air basins. The project site is in Riverside County and is within the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD, which regulates air quality in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin).

The Basin comprises approximately 10,000 square miles and covers all of Orange County and the urban parts of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties. The Basin is on a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills to the east. Regionally, the Basin is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the southwest and high mountains to the east, forming the inland perimeter.

Both State and federal governments have established health-based ambient air quality standards for six criteria air pollutants: CO, ozone (O
3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), lead (Pb), and suspended particulate matter. In addition, the State has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility-reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Two criteria pollutants, O3 and NO2, are considered regional pollutants because they (or their precursors) affect air quality on a regional scale. Pollutants such as CO, SO2, and Pb are considered local pollutants that tend to accumulate in the air locally.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 4 Air quality monitoring stations are located throughout the nation and are maintained by the local air districts and State air quality regulating agencies. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to identify regions as “attainment” or “nonattainment” depending on whether the regions meet the requirements stated in the applicable National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Nonattainment areas are imposed with additional restrictions as required by the USEPA. In addition, different classifications of attainment (e.g., marginal, moderate, serious, severe, and extreme) are used to classify each air basin in the State on a pollutant-by-pollutant basis. The classifications are used as a foundation to create air quality management strategies to improve air quality and to comply with the NAAQS. As shown in Table B, the Basin is designated as nonattainment by the federal standards for O3 and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) and nonattainment by the State standards for O3, particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10), and PM2.5.

Table B: Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin
Pollutant State Federal
O3 1-hour Nonattainment N/A
O3 8-hour Nonattainment Extreme Nonattainment
PM10 Nonattainment Attainment/Maintenance
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
CO Attainment Attainment/Maintenance
NO2 Attainment Unclassified/Attainment (1-hour)
Attainment/Maintenance (Annual)
SO2 Attainment Unclassified/Attainment
Lead Attainment1 Unclassified/Attainment1
All Others Attainment/Unclassified Attainment/Unclassified Source 1: NAAQS and CAAQS Attainment Status for South Coast Air Basin (SCAQMD 2016).

Source 2: Nonattainment Areas for Criteria Pollutants (Green Book) (USEPA 2019). 1 Only the Los Angeles County portion of the South Coast Air Basin is in nonattainment for lead.

CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CO = carbon monoxide
N/A = not applicable
NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NO2 = nitrogen dioxide
O3 = ozone
PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District
SO2 = sulfur dioxide
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency

O3 levels, as measured by peak concentrations and the number of days over the State 1-hour standard, have declined substantially as a result of aggressive programs by SCAQMD and other regional, State, and federal agencies. The reduction of peak concentrations represents progress in improving public health; however, the Basin still exceeds the State standard for 1-hour and 8-hour O3 levels. The USEPA lowered the 1997 0.80 part per million (ppm) national 8-hour O3 standard to

0.75 ppm in 2008 and then to 0.70 ppm on October 1, 2015. The Basin is classified as nonattainment for the 1-hour and 8-hour O3 standards at the State level and as extreme nonattainment for the 8-hour O3 standard at the federal level.

National and State standards have also been established for PM2.5 over 24-hour and yearly averaging periods. PM2.5, because of the small size of individual particles, can be especially harmful to human

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 5 health. PM2.5 is emitted by common combustion sources such as cars, trucks, buses, and power plants, in addition to ground-disturbing activities. On December 17, 2006, the USEPA strengthened the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS from 65 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) to 35 µg/m3, and the Basin was subsequently designated “moderate” nonattainment for 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS on December 14, 2009. On February 7, 2024, the USEPA strengthened the NAAQS for PM2.5 by revising the primary (health-based) annual standard from 12.0 µg/m3 to 9.0 µg/m3; however, a new attainment designation has not been issued. The Basin is also considered a nonattainment area for the PM2.5 standard at the State level.

The Basin is classified as a PM10 nonattainment area at the State level. All areas of the Basin have continued to remain below the federal CO standards (35 ppm 1-hour and 9 ppm 8-hour) since 2003.

The USEPA redesignated the Basin to attainment of the federal CO standards, effective June 11, 2017. The Basin is also well below the State CO standards (20 ppm 1-hour CO and 9 ppm 8-hour CO).

Air Quality Monitoring Results
Air quality monitoring stations are located throughout the nation and are maintained by the local air pollution control district and State air quality regulating agencies. The SCAQMD and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The air quality monitoring stations in Riverside County that are closest to the project site are the Lake Elsinore West Flint Street station located at 506 West Flint Street in Lake Elsinore, the Pechanga station located at 12705 Pechanga Road in Temecula, and the Riverside Rubidoux station located at 5888 Mission Boulevard in Jurupa Valley.

Pollutant monitoring results for years 2021 to 2023 at the nearby ambient air quality monitoring stations, which are shown in Table C, indicate that air quality in the area has generally been moderate. As indicated in the monitoring results shown in Table C, the State PM 10 standard was
exceeded 4 times in 2021, 1 time in 2022, and 7 times in 2023. In addition, the federal PM10 standard was not exceeded in 2021 or 2022, with one exceedance in 2023. The federal PM2.5 standard had no exceedances in between 2021 and 2023. The State 1-hour ozone standard was exceeded 18 times in 2021 and 17 times in 2022 with 10 exceedances in 2023. The State 8-hour ozone standard was exceeded 45 times in 2021, 37 times in 2022, and 35 times in 2023. The federal 8-hour ozone standard was exceeded 44 times in 2021,37 times in 2022, and 31 times in 2023. The federal CO maximum 1-hour and federal CO maximum 8-hour standards were not exceeded in the 3-year period. The federal SO2 standard was not exceeded between 2021 and 2023. The State SO2 and standard has an unknown number of exceedances for the 3-year period. The State NO2 maximum 1-hour standard was not exceeded between 2021 and 2023.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 6 Table C: Ambient Air Quality Monitored in the Project Vicinity Pollutant Standard 2021 2022 2023
Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1
Maximum 1-hr concentration (ppm) 0.9 0.9 1.3
Number of days exceeded: State: > 20 ppm 0 0 0
Federal: > 35 ppm 0 0 0
Maximum 8-hr concentration (ppm) 0.8 0.6 0.7
Number of days exceeded: State: ≥ 9.0 ppm 0 0 0
Federal: ≥ 9.0 ppm 0 0 0
Ozone (O3)1
Maximum 1-hr concentration (ppm) 0.118 0.121 0.120
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.09 ppm 18 17 10
Maximum 8-hr concentration (ppm) 0.097 0.091 0.103
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.070 ppm 45 37 35
Federal: > 0.070 ppm 44 37 31
Coarse Particulates (PM10)1
Maximum 24-hr concentration (µg/m3) 89.0 91.8 187.0
Number of days exceeded: State: > 50 µg/m3 4 1 7
Federal: > 150 µg/m3 0 0 1
Annual arithmetic average concentration (µg/m3) 41.7 35.4 34.0 Exceeded for the year: State: > 20 µg/m3 Yes Yes Yes
Federal: > 50 µg/m3 No No No
Fine Particulates (PM2.5)3
Maximum 24-hr concentration (µg/m3) 16.5 13.2 11.6
Number of days exceeded: Federal: > 35 µg/m3 0 0 0
Annual arithmetic average concentration (µg/m3) 7.0 5.9 6.6 Exceeded for the year: State: > 12 µg/m3 No No No
Federal: > 15 µg/m3 No No No
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)1
Maximum 1-hr concentration (ppm) 0.0437 0.0372 0.0412
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.18 ppm 0 0 0
Annual arithmetic average concentration (ppm) 0.007 0.007 0.007 Exceeded for the year: State: > 0.030 ppm No No No
Federal: > 0.053 ppm No No No
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)2
Maximum 24-hr concentration (ppm) 0.0027 0.0012 0.0023
Number of days exceeded: State: > 0.04 ppm ND ND ND
Federal: > 0.14 ppm 0 0 0
Annual arithmetic average concentration (ppm) 0.00043 0.00034 0.00043 Exceeded for the year: Federal: > 0.030 ppm No No No
Source 1: 2021–2023 Air Quality Data, Website: www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/monitor-values-report (USEPA 2024).

Source 2: iADAM: Air Quality Data Statistics, Website: www.arb.ca.gov/adam/index.html (CARB 2024). 1 Data taken from the Lake Elsinore West Flint Street station located at 506 West Flint Street, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County , California.
2 Data taken from the Riverside Rubidoux station located at 5888 Mission Boulevard, Jurupa Valley, Riverside County, California. 3 Data taken from the Pechanga station located at 12705 Pechanga Road, Temecula, Riverside County, California. µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
CARB = California Air Resources Board
hr = hour
ND = no data available
PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size ppm = parts per million
SJVAPCD = San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 7 Energy
Electricity
Electricity is a man-made resource. The production of electricity requires the consumption or conversion of energy resources (including water, wind, oil, gas, coal, solar, geothermal, and nuclear resources) into energy. Electricity is used for a variety of purposes (e.g., lighting, heating, cooling, and refrigeration, and for operating appliances, computers, electronics, machinery, and public transportation systems).

According to the most recent data available, in 2022, California’s electricity was generated primarily by natural gas (47.5 percent), renewable sources (52.2 percent), large hydroelectric (7.2 percent), nuclear (8.7 percent), coal (<1.0 percent), and other unspecified sources. Total electric generation in California in 2022 was 287,220 gigawatt-hours (GWh), up 3.4 percent from the 2021 total generation of 277,764 GWh.6
The project site is within the service territory of Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE provides electricity to more than 15 million people in a 50,000-square-mile area of Central, Coastal, and Southern California.
7 According to the California Energy Commission (CEC), total electricity consumption in the SCE service area in 2022 was 85,870 GWh (31,603 GWh for the residential sector and 54,267 GWh for the non-residential sector). Total electricity consumption in Riverside County in 2022 was 17,780.6 GWh (17,780,573,271 kilowatt-hours [kWh]).8 Natural Gas
Natural gas is a nonrenewable fossil fuel. Fossil fuels are formed when layers of decomposing plant and animal matter are exposed to intense heat and pressure under the surface of the Earth over millions of years. Natural gas is a combustible mixture of hydrocarbon compounds (primarily methane) that is used as a fuel source. Natural gas is found in naturally occurring reservoirs in deep underground rock formations. Natural gas is used for a variety of uses (e.g., heating buildings, generating electricity, and powering appliances such as stoves, washing machines and dryers, gas fireplaces, and gas grills).

Natural gas consumed in California is used for electricity generation (45 percent), residential uses (21 percent), industrial uses (25 percent), and commercial uses (9 percent). California continues to depend on out-of-state imports for nearly 90 percent of its natural gas supply. 9 6 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2022. 2022 Total System Electric Generation. Website: https://www. energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2022-total-system-electric- generation (accessed March 2025).
7 Southern California Edison (SCE). 2020. About Us. Website: https://www.sce.com/about-us/who-we-are (accessed March 2025).
8 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2020a. Electricity Consumption by County and Entity. Websites:
http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/ (accessed March 2025).
9 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2021. Supply and Demand of Natural Gas in California. Website:
https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/californias-natural-gas-market/supply-and- demand-natural-gas-california (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 8 The Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) is the natural gas service provider for the project site. SoCalGas provides natural gas to approximately 21.8 million people in a 24,000-square-mile service area throughout Central and Southern California, from Visalia to the Mexican border. 10 According to the CEC, total natural gas consumption in the SoCalGas service area in 2022 was 5,026 million therms (2,230 million therms for the residential sector). Total natural gas consumption in Riverside County in 2022 was 431 million therms (431,052,392 therms) of which 284 million therms were residential.
11 However, as described, in the Project Description, the proposed project would not include natural gas.

Fuel
Petroleum is also a nonrenewable fossil fuel. Petroleum is a thick, flammable, yellow-to-black mixture of gaseous, liquid, and solid hydrocarbons that occurs naturally beneath the Earth’s surface.

Petroleum is primarily recovered by oil drilling. It is refined into a large number of consumer products, primarily fuel oil, gasoline, and diesel.

The average fuel economy for light-duty vehicles (autos, pickups, vans, and sport utility vehicles [SUVs]) in the United States has steadily increased from about 14.9 miles per gallon (mpg) in 1980 to

22.9 mpg in 2021.
12 Federal fuel economy standards have changed substantially since the Energy Independence and Security Act was passed in 2007. This Act, which originally mandated a national fuel economy standard of 35 mpg by year 2020,13 applies to cars and light trucks of Model Years 2011 through 2020. In March 2020, the USEPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) finalized the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for Model Years 2024– 2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, which is further detailed below.

Gasoline is the most-used transportation fuel in California, with 97 percent of all gasoline being consumed by light-duty cars, pickup trucks, and sport utility vehicles (SUVs). According to the most recent data available, in 2022, total gasoline consumption in California was 316,425 thousand barrels or 1,597.6 trillion British thermal units (BTU). 14 Of the total gasoline consumption, 299,304
thousand barrels or 1,511.2 trillion BTU were consumed for transportation.15 Based on fuel consumption obtained from CARB’s California Emissions Factor Model, Version 2021 (EMFAC2021),

10 Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). 2020. About SoCalGas. Website:
https://www.socalgas.com/about-us (accessed March 2025). 11 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2020b. Gas Consumption by County and Entity. Website:
http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/ (accessed March 2025).
12 United States Department of Transportation (USDOT). Table 4-23: Average Fuel Efficiency of U.S. Light Duty Vehicles. Website: https://www.bts.gov/content/average-fuel-efficiency-us-light-duty-vehicles (accessed March 2025).
13 United States Department of Energy. 2007. Energy Independence & Security Act of 2007. Website:
https://www.afdc.energy.gov/laws/eisa (accessed March 2025). 14 United States Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2022. California State Profile and Energy Estimates, Data. Website: www.eia.gov/state/seds/data.php?incfile=/state/seds/sep_fuel/html/ fuel_mg.html&sid=CA (accessed March 2025).
15 Ibid.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 9 approximately 744.5 million gallons of gasoline and approximately 301.2 million gallons of diesel will be consumed from vehicle trips in Riverside County in 2024.

Greenhouse Gas Background
GHGs are present in the atmosphere naturally, are released by natural sources, or form from secondary reactions taking place in the atmosphere. Over the last 200 years, humans have caused substantial quantities of GHGs to be released into the atmosphere. These extra emissions are increasing GHG concentrations in the atmosphere and enhancing the natural greenhouse effect, which is believed to be causing global warming. Although man-made GHGs include naturally occurring GHGs such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), some gases like hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) are completely new to the atmosphere.

Certain gases, such as water vapor, are short-lived in the atmosphere. Others remain in the atmosphere for significant periods of time, contributing to climate change in the long term. Water vapor is excluded from the list of GHGs above because it is short-lived in the atmosphere and its atmospheric concentrations are largely determined by natural processes, such as oceanic evaporation.

These gases vary considerably in terms of global warming potential (GWP), which is a concept developed to compare the ability of each GHG to trap heat in the atmosphere relative to another gas. The GWP is based on several factors, including the relative effectiveness of a gas in absorbing infrared radiation and the length of time that the gas remains in the atmosphere (“atmospheric lifetime”). The GWP of each gas is measured relative to CO 2, the most abundant GHG; the definition
of GWP for a particular GHG is the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of the GHG to the ratio of heat trapped by one unit mass of CO2 over a specified time period. GHG emissions are typically measured in terms of pounds or tons of “CO2 equivalents” (CO2e).

REGULATORY SETTING
This section provides regulatory background information for air quality, GHG, and energy.

Air Quality
Applicable federal, State, regional, and local air quality regulations are discussed below.

Federal Regulations
The 1970 federal Clean Air Act (CAA) authorized the establishment of national health-based air quality standards and set deadlines for their attainment. The CAA Amendments of 1990 changed deadlines for attaining national standards as well as the remedial actions required for areas of the nation that exceed the standards. Under the CAA, State and local agencies in areas that exceed the national standards are required to develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to demonstrate how they will achieve the national standards by specified dates.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 10 State Regulations
In 1988, the California Clean Air Act (CCAA) required that all air districts in the State endeavor to achieve and maintain California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) for CO, O3, SO2, and NO2 by the earliest practical date. The CCAA provides districts with the authority to regulate indirect sources and mandates that air quality districts focus particular attention on reducing emissions from transportation and areawide emission sources. Each nonattainment district is required to adopt a plan to achieve a 5 percent annual reduction, averaged over consecutive 3-year periods, in districtwide emissions of each nonattainment pollutant or its precursors. A Clean Air Plan shows how a district would reduce emissions to achieve air quality standards. Generally, the State standards for these pollutants are more stringent than the national standards.

CARB is the State’s “clean air agency.” CARB’s goals are to attain and maintain healthy air quality, protect the public from exposure to toxic air contaminants (TACs), and oversee compliance with air pollution rules and regulations.

Regional Regulations
The proposed project would be required to comply with regional rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emissions. SCAQMD Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emissions source. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 403 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. SCAQMD Rule 1113 limits the volatile organic compound (VOC) content of architectural coatings. Applicable dust suppression techniques from SCAQMD Rule 403 and low VOC content in paints under SCAQMD Rule 1113 are summarized below. Implementation of these dust suppression techniques can reduce the fugitive dust generation (and thus the PM 10 component).

Compliance with these rules would reduce impacts on nearby sensitive receptors. • South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 Measures ○ Water active sites at least two times daily (locations where grading is to occur will be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving).
○ All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials are to be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code Section 23114 (freeboard means vertical space between the top of the load and top of the trailer).
○ Traffic speeds on all unpaved roads shall be reduced to 15 miles per hour (mph) or less. • South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 Measures: SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacture of architectural coating and limits the VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during construction and operation of the proposed project. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of the proposed project must comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 11 Local Regulations
City of Moreno Valley General Plan 2006. The City of Moreno Valley addresses air quality in the Conservation Element of the General Plan 2006.16 The following policy from the Conservation Element is applicable to the proposed project:
• Policy 7.1.1: Require that grading plans include appropriate and feasible measures to minimize erosion, sedimentation, wind erosion and fugitive dust.

Energy
Federal and State agencies regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. On the federal level, the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), the United States Department of Energy, and the USEPA are three federal agencies with substantial influence over energy policies and programs. Generally, federal agencies influence and regulate transportation energy consumption through establishment and enforcement of fuel economy standards for automobiles and light trucks, through funding of energy-related research and development projects, and through funding for transportation infrastructure improvements. On the State level, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the CEC are two agencies with authority over different aspects of energy.

The CPUC regulates privately owned electric, natural gas, telecommunications, water, railroad, rail transit, and passenger transportation companies and serves the public interest by protecting consumers and ensuring the provision of safe, reliable utility service and infrastructure at reasonable rates, with a commitment to environmental enhancement and a healthy California economy.

The CEC is the State’s primary energy policy and planning agency. The CEC forecasts future energy needs, promotes energy efficiency, supports energy research, develops renewable energy resources, and plans for/directs State response to energy emergencies. The applicable federal, State, regional, and local regulatory framework is discussed below.

Federal Regulations
Energy Policy Act of 2005. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 seeks to reduce reliance on nonrenewable energy resources and provide incentives to reduce current demand on these resources. For example, under this Act, consumers and businesses can obtain federal tax credits for purchasing fuel-efficient appliances and products (including hybrid vehicles), building energy-efficient buildings, and improving the energy efficiency of commercial buildings. Additionally, tax credits are available for the installation of qualified fuel cells, stationary microturbine power plants, and solar power equipment.

Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards. On March 31, 2022, the NHTSA finalized the CAFE standards for Model Years 2024–2026 Passenger Cars and Light Trucks. The amended CAFE

16 City of Moreno Valley. 2006. Moreno Valley General Plan, Chapter 9 Goals and Objectives. Website:
https://moval.gov/city_hall/general-plan/06gpfinal/gp/9-goals.pdf (accessed March 2025)

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 12 standards would require an industry-wide fleet average of approximately 49 mpg for passenger cars and light trucks in model year 2026 by increasing fuel efficiency by 8 percent annually for model years 2024–2025 and 10 percent annually for model year 2026. The final standards are estimated to save about 234 billion gallons of gasoline between model years 2030 and 2050.

State Regulations
Assembly Bill 1575, Warren-Alquist Act. In 1975, largely in response to the oil crisis of the 1970s, the State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill (AB) 1575 (also known as the Warren-Alquist Act), which created the CEC. The statutory mission of the CEC is to forecast future energy needs; license power plants of 50 megawatts (MW) or larger; develop energy technologies and renewable energy resources; plan for and direct State responses to energy emergencies; and, perhaps most importantly, promote energy efficiency through the adoption and enforcement of appliance and building energy efficiency standards. AB 1575 also amended Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21100(b)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 to require Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) to include, where relevant, mitigation measures proposed to minimize the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy caused by a project. Thereafter, the State Resources Agency created Appendix F to the State CEQA Guidelines. Appendix F assists EIR preparers in determining whether a project will result in the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy. Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines also states that the goal of conserving energy implies the wise and efficient use of energy and the means of achieving this goal, including (1) decreasing overall per capita energy consumption; (2) decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil; and (3) increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.

Senate Bill 1389, Energy: Planning and Forecasting. In 2002, the State Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 1389, which required the CEC to develop an integrated energy plan every 2 years for electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuels for the California Energy Policy Report. The plan calls for the State to assist in the transformation of the transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan identifies a number of strategies (including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators in implementing incentive programs for zero emission vehicles [ZEVs] and their infrastructure needs) for encouraging urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access.

In compliance with the requirements of SB 1389, the CEC adopts an Integrated Energy Policy Report every 2 years and an update every other year. The most recently adopted report includes the 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report.
17 The Integrated Energy Policy Report covers a broad range of topics, including decarbonizing buildings, integrating renewables, energy efficiency, energy equity, integrating renewable energy, updates on Southern California electricity reliability, climate adaptation activities for the energy sector, natural gas assessment, transportation energy demand forecast, and the California Energy Demand Forecast. The Integrated Energy Policy Report provides the results of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these

17 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2023. 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket Number: 23-IEPR-01.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 13 issues will require action if the State is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining energy reliability and controlling costs.

Renewable Portfolio Standard. SB 1078 established the California Renewable Portfolio Standards program in 2002. SB 1078 initially required that 20 percent of electricity retail sales be served by renewable resources by 2017; however, this standard has become more stringent over time. In 2006, SB 107 accelerated the standard by requiring that the 20 percent mandate be met by 2010. In April 2011, SB 2 required that 33 percent of electricity retail sales be served by renewable resources by 2020. In 2015, SB 350 established tiered increases to the Renewable Portfolio Standards of 50 percent by 2030. In 2018, SB 100 increased the requirement to 60 percent by 2030 and required that all the State’s electricity come from carbon-free resources by 2045. SB 100 took effect on January 1, 2019.
18 California Energy Code. Energy consumption by new buildings in California is regulated by the Building Energy Efficiency Standards in Part 6 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), known as the Energy Code. The CEC first adopted the Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Buildings in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce energy consumption in the State. The Energy Code is updated every 3 years, with the most recent update consisting of the 2022 Energy Code that became effective January 1, 2023. Mid-cycle supplements to the 2022 Code will become effective on July 1, 2024. The efficiency standards apply to both new construction and rehabilitation of both residential and nonresidential buildings, and regulate energy consumed for heating, cooling, ventilation, water heating, and lighting. The building efficiency standards are enforced through the local building permit process. Local government agencies may adopt and enforce energy standards for new buildings, provided these standards meet or exceed those provided in the Energy Code.

California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code). In 2010, the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) adopted Part 11 of the Title 24 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, referred to as the CALGreen Code. The CALGreen Code took effect on January 1, 2011. The CALGreen Code is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent update consisting of the 2022 CALGreen Code standards that became effective January 1, 2023. The CALGreen Code established mandatory measures for residential and nonresidential building construction and encouraged sustainable construction practices in the following five categories: (1) planning and design, (2) energy efficiency, (3) water efficiency and conservation, (4) material conservation and resource efficiency, and (5) indoor environmental quality. Although the CALGreen Code was adopted as part of the State’s efforts to reduce GHG emissions, the CALGreen Code standards have co-benefits of reducing energy consumption from residential and nonresidential buildings subject to the standard.

California Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan. On September 18, 2008, the CPUC adopted California’s first Long-Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan (Strategic Plan), presenting a roadmap for energy efficiency in California. The Strategic Plan was updated in 2011. The Plan articulates a long-term vision and goals for each economic sector and identifies specific near-term, mid-term, and long-term strategies to assist in achieving those goals. The Strategic Plan also reiterates the following four

18 California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2019. Renewables Portfolio Standard Program. Website:

Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) Program (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 14 specific programmatic goals known as the “Big Bold Energy Efficiency Strategies” that were established by the CPUC in Decisions D.07-10-032 and D.07-12-051:
• All new residential construction will be zero net energy (ZNE) by 2020. • All new commercial construction will be ZNE by 2030.
• 50 percent of commercial buildings will be retrofitted to ZNE by 2030. • 50 percent of new major renovations of State buildings will be ZNE by 2025.

Regional Regulations
There are no regional regulations that apply to the proposed project.

Local Regulations
City of Moreno Valley General Plan 2006. The City of Moreno Valley addresses energy in the Conservation Element of the General Plan 2006.19 The following policies from the Conservation Element are applicable to the proposed project:
• Policy 7.5.1: Encourage building, site design, and landscaping techniques that provide passive heating and cooling to reduce energy demand.
• Policy 7.5.2: Encourage energy efficient modes of transportation and fixed facilities, including transit, bicycle, equestrian, and pedestrian transportation. Emphasize fuel efficiency in the acquisition and use of City-owned vehicles. • Policy 7.5.3: Locate areas planned for commercial, industrial and multiple family density residential development within areas of high transit potential and access. • Policy 7.5.5: Encourage the use of solar power and other renewable energy systems.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
This section describes regulations related to global climate change at the federal, State, and local levels.

Federal Regulations
The United States has historically had a voluntary approach to reducing GHG emissions. However, on April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the USEPA has the authority to regulate CO2 emissions under the CAA.

Although there currently are no adopted federal regulations for the control or reduction of GHG emissions, the USEPA commenced several actions in 2009 to implement a regulatory approach to global climate change, including the 2009 USEPA final rule for mandatory reporting of GHGs from large GHG emission sources in the United States. Additionally, the USEPA Administrator signed an

19 City of Moreno Valley. 2006. Moreno Valley General Plan, Chapter 9 Goals and Objectives. Website:
https://moval.gov/city_hall/general-plan/06gpfinal/gp/9-goals.pdf (accessed March 2025)

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 15 endangerment finding action in 2009 under the CAA, finding that seven GHGs (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, NF3, PFCs, and SF6) constitute a threat to public health and welfare, and that the combined emissions from motor vehicles cause and contribute to global climate change, leading to national GHG emission standards.

State Regulations
CARB is the lead agency for implementing climate change regulations in the State. Since its formation, CARB has worked with the public, the business sector, and local governments to find solutions to California’s air pollution problems. Key efforts by the State are described below.

Assembly Bill 32 (2006), California Global Warming Solutions Act. California’s major initiative for reducing GHG emissions is AB 32, passed by the State Legislature on August 31, 2006. This effort set a target to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. CARB has established the level of GHG emissions in 1990 at 427 million metric tons (MMT) of CO 2e. The emission target of 427 MMT
requires the reduction of 169 MMT from the State’s projected business-as-usual 2020 emissions of 596 MMT. AB 32 requires CARB to prepare a Scoping Plan that outlines the main State strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline and to reduce GHGs that contribute to global climate change. CARB approved the Scoping Plan on December 11, 2008, which contains the main strategies California will implement to achieve the reduction goals and includes CARB-recommended GHG reductions for each emissions sector of the State’s GHG inventory.

The CARB approved the First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan on May 22, 2014. The First Update identifies opportunities to leverage existing and new funds to further drive GHG emission reductions through strategic planning and targeted low carbon investments. The First Update defines CARB climate change priorities until 2020 and sets the groundwork to reach long-term goals set forth in Executive Orders (EOs) S-3-05 and B-16-2012. The First Update highlights California’s progress toward meeting the “near-term” 2020 GHG emission reduction goals as defined in the initial Scoping Plan. It also evaluates how to align the State’s “longer-term” GHG reduction strategies with other State policy priorities for water, waste, natural resources, clean energy, transportation, and land use. CARB released a second update to the Scoping Plan, the 2017 Scoping Plan, 20 to reflect
the 2030 target that was set by EO B-30-15 and codified by SB 32.

The 2022 Scoping Plan21 was approved in December 2022 and assesses progress toward the statutory 2030 target while laying out a path to achieving carbon neutrality no later than 2045. The 2022 Scoping Plan Update focuses on outcomes needed to achieve carbon neutrality by assessing paths for clean technology, energy deployment, natural and working lands, and others, and is designed to meet the State’s long-term climate objectives and support a range of economic, environmental, energy security, environmental justice, and public health priorities.

The 2022 Scoping Plan focuses on building clean energy production and distribution infrastructure for a carbon-neutral future, including transitioning existing energy production and transmission

20 California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2017. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. November. 21 California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022b. 2022 Scoping Plan Update. May 10. Website:
https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-12/2022-sp.pdf (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 16 infrastructure to produce zero-carbon electricity and hydrogen, and utilizing biogas resulting from wildfire management or landfill and dairy operations, among other substitutes. The 2022 Scoping Plan states that in almost all sectors, electrification will play an important role. The 2022 Scoping Plan evaluates clean energy and technology options and the transition away from fossil fuels, including adding four times the solar and wind capacity by 2045 and about 1,700 times the amount of current hydrogen supply. As discussed in the 2022 Scoping Plan, EO N-79-20 requires that all new passenger vehicles sold in California be zero emission by 2035 and that all other fleets transition to zero emission as fully as possible by 2045, which will reduce the percentage of fossil fuel combustion vehicles.

Senate Bill 375 (2008). Signed into law on October 1, 2008, SB 375 supplements GHG reductions from new vehicle technology and fuel standards with reductions from more efficient land use patterns and improved transportation. Under the law, CARB-approved GHG reduction targets in February 2011 for California’s 18 federally designated regional planning bodies, known as Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). CARB may update the targets every 4 years and must update them every 8 years. MPOs, in turn, must demonstrate how their plans, policies, and transportation investments meet the targets set by CARB through Sustainable Community Strategies (SCSs). The SCSs are included with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a report required by State law. However, if an MPO finds that its SCS will not meet the GHG reduction targets, it may prepare an Alternative Planning Strategy. The Alternative Planning Strategy identifies the impediments to achieving the targets.

Executive Order B-30-15 (2015). Governor Jerry Brown signed EO B-30-15 on April 29, 2015, which added the immediate target of:
• GHG emissions should be reduced to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030.

All State agencies with jurisdiction over sources of GHG emissions were directed to implement measures to achieve reductions of GHG emissions to meet the 2030 and 2050 targets. CARB was directed to update the AB 32 Scoping Plan to reflect the 2030 target and, therefore, is moving forward with the update process. The mid-term target is critical to help frame the suite of policy measures, regulations, planning efforts, and investments in clean technologies and infrastructure needed to continue reducing emissions.

Senate Bill 350 (2015) Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act. SB 350, signed by Governor Jerry Brown on October 7, 2015, updates and enhances AB 32 by introducing the following set of objectives in clean energy, clean air, and pollution reduction for 2030:
• Raise California’s renewable portfolio standard from 33 percent to 50 percent. • Increase energy efficiency in buildings by 50 percent by the year 2030.

The 50 percent renewable energy standard will be implemented by the CPUC for the private utilities and by the CEC for municipal utilities. Each utility must submit a procurement plan showing it will purchase clean energy to displace other nonrenewable resources. The 50 percent increase in energy efficiency in buildings must be achieved through the use of existing energy efficiency retrofit funding and regulatory tools already available to State energy agencies under existing law. The addition

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 17 made by this legislation requires State energy agencies to plan for and implement those programs in a manner that achieves the energy efficiency target.

Senate Bill 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2016, and Assembly Bill 197. In summer 2016, the Legislature passed, and the Governor signed, SB 32 and AB 197. SB 32 affirms the importance of addressing climate change by codifying into statute the GHG emissions reductions target of at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 contained in Governor Brown’s April 2015 EO B-30-15. SB 32 builds on AB 32 and keeps the State on the path toward achieving its 2050 objective of reducing emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels, consistent with an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change analysis of the emission trajectory that would stabilize atmospheric GHG concentrations at 450 ppm CO2e and reduce the likelihood of catastrophic impacts from climate change.

AB 197, the companion bill to SB 32, provides additional direction to CARB related to the adoption of strategies to reduce GHG emissions. Additional direction in AB 197 meant to provide easier public access to air emissions data that are collected by CARB was posted in December 2016.

Senate Bill 100.On September 10, 2018, Governor Brown signed SB 100, which raises California’s renewable portfolio standard requirements to 60 percent by 2030, with interim targets, and 100 percent by 2045. The bill also establishes a State policy that eligible renewable energy resources and zero-carbon resources supply 100 percent of all retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers and 100 percent of electricity procured to serve all State agencies by December 31, 2045.

Under the bill, the State cannot increase carbon emissions elsewhere in the western grid or allow resource shuffling to achieve the 100 percent carbon-free electricity target.

Executive Order B-55-18.EO B-55-18, signed September 10, 2018, sets a goal “to achieve carbon neutrality as soon as possible, and no later than 2045, and achieve and maintain net negative emissions thereafter.” EO B-55-18 directs CARB to work with relevant State agencies to ensure that future Scoping Plans identify and recommend measures to achieve the carbon neutrality goal. The goal of carbon neutrality by 2045 is in addition to other statewide goals, meaning that not only should emissions be reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, but that, by no later than 2045, the remaining emissions should be offset by equivalent net removals of CO 2e from the
atmosphere, including through sequestration in forests, soils, and other natural landscapes.

Assembly Bill 1279. AB 1279 was signed in September 2022 and codifies the State goals of achieving net carbon neutrality by 2045 and maintaining net negative GHG emissions thereafter. This bill also requires California to reduce statewide GHG emissions by 85 percent compared to 1990 levels by 2045 and directs CARB to work with relevant State agencies to achieve these goals.

Assembly Bill 1279. AB 1279 was signed in September of 2022, and codifies the State goals of achieving net carbon neutrality by 2045 and maintaining net negative GHG emissions thereafter.

This bill also requires California to reduce statewide GHG emissions by 85 percent compared to 1990 levels by 2045 and directs CARB to work with relevant State agencies to achieve these goals.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 18 Regional Regulations
Southern California Association of Governments. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) is a regional council consisting of the following six counties: Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. In total, the SCAG region encompasses 191 cities and over 38,000 square miles within Southern California. SCAG is the MPO serving the region under federal law and serves as the Joint Powers Authority, the Regional Transportation Planning Agency, and the Council of Governments under State law. As the Regional Transportation Planning Agency, SCAG prepares long-range transportation plans for the Southern California region, including the RTP/SCS and the 2008 Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP).

On April 4, 2024, SCAG adopted Connect SoCal: The 2024–2050 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (2024–2050 RTP/SCS).22 In general, the SCS outlines a development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce VMT from automobiles and light-duty trucks and thereby reduce GHG emissions from these sources. For the SCAG region, CARB has set GHG reduction targets at 8 percent below 2005 per-capita emission levels by 2020 and 19 percent below 2005 per capita emission levels by 2035. The RTP/SCS lays out a strategy for the region to meet these targets. Overall, the SCS is meant to provide growth strategies that will achieve the regional GHG emission reduction targets. Land use strategies to achieve the region’s targets include planning for new growth around high-quality transit areas and livable corridors and creating neighborhood mobility areas to integrate land use and transportation and plan for more active lifestyles.23 However, the SCS does not require that local General Plans, Specific Plans, or zoning be consistent with the SCS; instead, it provides incentives to governments and developers for consistency.

South Coast Air Quality Management District. In 2008, the SCAQMD formed a Working Group to identify GHG emissions thresholds for land use projects that could be used by local lead agencies in the SCAQMD. The Working Group developed several different options that are contained in the SCAQMD 2008 draft guidance document titled Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans (2008) that could be applied by lead agencies. On September 28, 2010, SCAQMD Working Group Meeting No. 15 provided further guidance, including a tiered approach for evaluating GHG emissions for development projects where SCAQMD is not the lead agency. SCAQMD has not presented a finalized version of these thresholds to its governing board.

SCAQMD identifies the emissions level for which a project would not be expected to substantially conflict with any State legislation adopted to reduce statewide GHG emissions. As such, the utilization of a service population represents the rates of emissions needed to achieve a fair share of the State’s mandated emissions reductions. Overall, SCAQMD identifies a GHG efficiency level that, when applied statewide or to a defined geographic area, would meet the 2020 and post-2020 emission targets as required by AB 32 and SB 32. If projects are able to achieve targeted rates of

22 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2024. Connect SoCal: The 2024–2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments. Website: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/23-2987-connect-socal- 2024-final-complete-040424.pdf?1712261565 (accessed March 2025). 23 Ibid.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 19 emissions per the service population, the State would be able to accommodate expected population growth and achieve economic development objectives while also abiding by AB 32’s emissions target and future post-2020 targets. The SCAQMD has established a flowchart for evaluating GHG significance and indicates that when a project is exempt from CEQA, no further analysis is required.

Local Regulations
City of Moreno Valley General Plan 2006. The City of Moreno Valley addresses greenhouse gases in the Conservation Element of the General Plan 2006.24 The following policies from the Conservation Element are applicable to the proposed project:
• Policy 7.3.1: Require water conserving landscape and irrigation systems through development review. Minimize the use of lawn within private developments, and within parkway areas. The use of mulch and native and drought tolerant landscaping shall be encouraged.
• Policy 7.5.1: Encourage building, site design, and landscaping techniques that provide passive heating and cooling to reduce energy demand.
• Policy 7.5.2: Encourage energy efficient modes of transportation and fixed facilities, including transit, bicycle, equestrian, and pedestrian transportation. Emphasize fuel efficiency in the acquisition and use of City-owned vehicles. • Policy 7.8.1: Encourage recycling projects by individuals, non-profit organizations, or corporations and local businesses, as well as programs sponsored through government agencies.

City of Moreno Valley Climate Action Plan (CAP). The City of Moreno Valley adopted the CAP on June 15, 2021.
25 The City’s CAP is designed to reinforce the City’s commitment to reducing GHG emissions and demonstrate how the City will comply with the State’s GHG emission reduction standards. The CAP has been prepared concurrently with the updated Moreno Valley General Plan, reflecting the City’s most current land use and transportation strategy, and GHG implications of various General Plan’s goals and policies. While there is no sunset year for the CAP, the CAP provides analysis of GHG emissions to the year 2040, which is the General Plan horizon year. The following reduction measures from the City’s CAP will be applicable to the proposed project:
• Implement trip reduction programs in new residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments.
• Expand efforts to install energy efficient lighting technologies in new and existing private parking lots.

24 City of Moreno Valley. 2006. Moreno Valley General Plan, Chapter 9 Goals and Objectives. Website:
https://moval.gov/city_hall/general-plan/06gpfinal/gp/9-goals.pdf (accessed March 2025) 25 City of Moreno Valley. 2021. City of Moreno Valley Climate Action Plan. June 15. Website:
https://moval.gov/city_hall/general-plan2040/MV-CAP.pdf (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 20 • Facilitate energy efficiency improvements in nonresidential buildings through incentives and regulations that may include energy performance reports, time of sale upgrades, and/or innovative partnerships such as expansion of utility provider (e.g., Moreno Valley Electric Utility [MVU], SCE, SoCalGas) programs to reduce energy use.
• Encourage residents and businesses to use efficient lawn and garden maintenance equipment or to reduce the need for landscape maintenance through native planting. • Reduce emissions from heavy-duty construction equipment by limiting idling based on SCAQMD requirements and utilizing cleaner fuels, equipment, and vehicles. • Require new landscaping to be climate appropriate.

METHODOLOGY
Construction Emissions
Construction activities can generate a substantial amount of air pollution. Construction activities are considered temporary; however, short-term impacts can contribute to exceedances of air quality standards. Construction activities include site preparation, earthmoving, and general construction.

The emissions generated from these common construction activities include fugitive dust from soil disturbance and fuel combustion from mobile heavy-duty, diesel- and gasoline-powered equipment, portable auxiliary equipment, and worker commute trips.

The California Emissions Estimator Model version 2022.1 (CalEEMod) computer program was used to calculate emissions from on-site construction equipment and emissions from worker and vehicle trips to the site. This analysis assumes that construction of the proposed project is anticipated to occur over a period of 12 months, ending in the second quarter of 2027. This analysis also assumes that the proposed project would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 measures. Site preparation, grading, and building activities would involve the use of standard earthmoving equipment such as large excavators, cranes, and other related equipment. In addition, the proposed project would result in approximately 4,210 cubic yards of soil exportation. 26 All other construction details are not
yet known; therefore, default assumptions (e.g., construction equipment, construction worker and truck trips, and fleet activities) from CalEEMod were used.

Operational Emissions
This air quality analysis includes estimating emissions associated with long-term operation of the project. Indirect emissions of criteria pollutants with regional impacts would be emitted by project- generated vehicle trips. In addition, localized air quality impacts (i.e., higher CO concentrations or

26 The CalEEMod modeling evaluated the project emissions assuming construction would begin in November 2025 and end in November 2026 and require approximately 5,000 cubic yards of soil export. The project schedule and grading plans have since been modified to assume construction would end in the second quarter of 2027 and approximately 4,210 cubic yards of soil export would be required. The 12-month construction duration remained the same. These modifications to the project have been reviewed by LSA and it was determined that the modified construction schedule and soil export quantities would not result in more severe impacts than what is described within.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 21 “hot spots”) near intersections or roadway segments in the project vicinity would also potentially occur due to project-generated vehicle trips.

Consistent with SCAQMD guidance for estimating emissions associated with land use development projects, the CalEEMod computer program was used to calculate the long-term operational emissions associated with the project. As previously discussed in the Project Location and Description section, the proposed project would construct a 132,003-square-foot, three-story, self- storage building including 20,777 square-feet of landscaping. Therefore, the proposed project analysis was conducted using the land use codes Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No-Rail and Parking Lot. Trip generation rates used in CalEEMod for the project were based on the project’s trip generation analysis, which identifies that the project would generate approximately 216 average daily trips.27 In addition, consistent with the project design plans, this CalEEMod analysis incorporates selections to reflect drought tolerant landscape, low water irrigation, and no natural gas. When project-specific data were not available, default assumptions from CalEEMod were used to estimate project emissions.

Energy Use
The analysis focuses on the three sources of energy that are relevant to the proposed project:
electricity, the equipment fuel necessary for project construction, and vehicle fuel necessary for project operations. For the purpose of this analysis, the amounts of electricity, construction fuel, and fuel use from operations are quantified and compared to that consumed in Riverside County.

The electricity of the proposed project is analyzed on an annual basis. Electricity uses were estimated for the project using default energy intensities by land use type in CalEEMod.

Greenhouse Gas Emissions
GHG emissions associated with the project would occur over the short term from construction activities, consisting primarily of emissions from equipment exhaust. There would also be long-term GHG emissions associated with project-related vehicular trips. Recognizing that the field of global climate change analysis is rapidly evolving, the approaches advocated most recently indicate that, for determining a project’s contribution to GHG emissions, lead agencies should calculate, or estimate, emissions from vehicular traffic, energy consumption, water conveyance and treatment, waste generation, construction activities, and any other significant source of emissions within the project area. The CalEEMod results were used to quantify GHG emissions generated by the project.

THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Air Quality
The State CEQA Guidelines indicate that a project would normally have a significant adverse air quality impact if project-generated pollutant emissions would do any of the following:
• Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan;

27 LSA. 2024. Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis for the Public Storage Moreno Valley Project (LSA Project No. 20241908). October 16.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 22 • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project is in nonattainment under applicable NAAQS or CAAQS;
• Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or • Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) affecting a substantial number of people.

Certain air districts (e.g., SCAQMD) have created guidelines and requirements to conduct air quality analysis. The SCAQMD’s current guidelines, the CEQA Air Quality Handbook 28 with associated
updates, were followed in this assessment of air quality impacts for the proposed project.

Regional Emissions Thresholds
SCAQMD has established daily emission thresholds for construction and operation of proposed projects. The emission thresholds were established based on the attainment status of the air basins within the SCAQMD with regard to air quality standards for specific criteria pollutants. Because the concentration standards were set at a level that protects public health with an adequate margin of safety, these emission thresholds are regarded as conservative and would overstate an individual project’s contribution to health risks. Table D lists the CEQA significance thresholds for construction and operational emissions established for the SCAQMD.

Table D: Regional Thresholds for Construction and Operational Emissions Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions Threshold (lbs/day) VOCs NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 SOX
Construction 75 100 550 150 55 150
Operations 55 55 550 150 55 150
Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2019. Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Website:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed March 2025).

CO = carbon monoxide
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size
SOX = sulfur oxides
VOCs = volatile organic compound

Projects in the SCAQMD with construction- or operations-related emissions that exceed any of their respective emission thresholds would be considered significant under SCAQMD guidelines. These thresholds, which SCAQMD developed and which apply throughout the SCAQMD, apply as both project and cumulative thresholds. If a project exceeds these standards, it is considered to have a project-specific and cumulative impact.

28 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1993. CEQA Air Quality Handbook (currently under revision). Website: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/air-quality-analysis- handbook/ceqa-air-quality-handbook-(1993) (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 23 Local Microscale Concentration Standards
The significance of localized project impacts under CEQA depends on whether ambient CO levels in the project vicinity are above or below State and federal CO standards. Because ambient CO levels are below the standards throughout the SCAQMD, a project would be considered to have a significant CO impact if project emissions would result in an exceedance of one or more of the 1-hour or 8-hour standards. The following are applicable local emission concentration standards for CO:
• California State 1-hour CO standard of 20 ppm
• California State 8-hour CO standard of 9 ppm
Localized Impacts Analysis
The SCAQMD published its Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology in July 2008, recommending that all air quality analyses include an assessment of air quality impacts to nearby sensitive receptors.29 This guidance was used to analyze potential localized air quality impacts associated with construction of the proposed project. Localized significance thresholds (LSTs) are developed based on the size or total area of the emission source, the ambient air quality in the Source Receptor Area (SRA), and the distance to the project site. Sensitive receptors include residences, schools, hospitals, and similar uses that are sensitive to adverse air quality.

LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project’s SRA and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. For the proposed project, the appropriate SRA for the LST is the Moreno Valley area (SRA 24). The SCAQMD provides LST screening tables for 25-, 50-, 100-, 200-, and 500-meter source-receptor distances. The nearest sensitive receptors include the single- family residences along Pheasant Knoll Lane, which are located within 50 feet to the east of the project site (measured from the project site boundary to the center of the nearest residence). In cases where receptors may be closer than 82 feet (25 meters), any distances within the 82-foot (25-meter) buffer zone can be used. As such, the minimum distance of 25 meters was used for purposes of the LST assessment. Based on the anticipated construction equipment, it is assumed that the maximum daily disturbed acreage would be 3.5 acres for construction of the proposed project. The project site is 3.0 acres; therefore, the maximum daily disturbed acreage during operation of the proposed project would be 3.0 acres.
30 Table E lists the emissions thresholds that
apply during project construction and operation.

29 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July.
30 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). n.d. Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. Website: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 24 Table E: SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds
Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions Threshold (lbs/day) NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Construction (3.5 acres, 25-meter distance) 220.0 1,230.0 10.0 6.0 Operations (3.0 acres, 25-meter distance) 203.0 1,114.0 2.7 1.3 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July.

CO = carbon monoxide
lbs/day = pounds per day
LST = localized significance threshold
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in size PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in size

Energy
The State CEQA Guidelines indicate that a project would normally have a significant adverse impact related to energy if the project would:
• Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; or • Conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency.

Greenhouse Gas Thresholds
The State CEQA Guidelines indicate that a project would normally have a significant effect on the environment if it would:
• Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or
• Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs.

To provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents, SCAQMD has convened a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group (Working Group). Based on the last Working Group meeting modified in September 2010 (Meeting No. 15),31 SCAQMD proposed to adopt a tiered approach for evaluating GHG emissions for development projects where SCAQMD is not the lead agency:
• Tier 1—Exemptions: If a project is exempt from CEQA, project-level and cumulative GHG emissions are less than significant.

31 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2010. Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15. September 28. Website: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/ default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008- 2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf (accessed March 2025)

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 25 • Tier 2—Consistency with a Locally Adopted GHG Reduction Plan: If the project complies with a GHG emissions reduction plan or mitigation program that avoids or substantially reduces GHG emissions in the project’s geographic area (i.e., city or county), project-level and cumulative GHG emissions are less than significant.
• Tier 3—Numerical Screening Threshold: If GHG emissions are less than the numerical screening- level threshold, project-level and cumulative GHG emissions are less than significant.

For projects that are not exempt or where no qualifying GHG reduction plans are directly applicable, SCAQMD requires an assessment of GHG emissions. SCAQMD, under Option 1, is proposing a “bright-line” screening-level threshold of 3,000 MT CO 2e per year (or MT CO2e/yr)
for all land use types or, under Option 2, the following land use-specific thresholds: 1,400 MT CO2e for commercial projects; 3,500 MT CO2e for residential projects; or 3,000 MT CO2e for mixed-use projects. This bright-line threshold is based on a review of the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) database of CEQA projects. Based on their review of 711 CEQA projects, 90 percent of CEQA projects would exceed the bright-line thresholds identified above.

Therefore, projects that do not exceed the bright-line threshold would have a nominal and therefore less than cumulatively considerable impact on GHG emissions. • Tier 4—Performance Standards: If emissions exceed the numerical screening threshold, a more detailed review of the project’s GHG emissions is warranted. The SCAQMD has proposed an efficiency target for projects that exceed the bright-line threshold. The current recommended approach is per-capita efficiency targets. The SCAQMD is not recommending use of a percentage emissions reduction target. Instead, the SCAQMD proposes proposed a 2035 efficiency target of

3.0 MT CO2e/yr per service population for project-level analyses and 4.1 MT CO2e/yr per service population for plan-level projects (e.g., program-level projects such as General Plans).

For the purpose of this analysis, the proposed project will be compared to the threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/yr for all land use types. The proposed project is also evaluated for compliance with the City’s CAP, the 2022 Scoping Plan, and the 2024–2050 RTP/SCS.

IMPACT ANALYSIS
This section identifies potential air quality, energy, and GHG impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project.

Air Quality Impacts
Air pollutant emissions associated with the project would occur over the short term from construction activities and over the long term from project-related vehicular trips and due to energy consumption (e.g., electricity and natural gas usage) by the proposed land uses.

Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plans
A consistency determination plays an essential role in local agency project review by linking local planning and unique individual projects to the air quality plans. A consistency determination fulfills the CEQA goal of fully informing local agency decision-makers of the environmental costs of the

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 26 project under consideration at a stage early enough to ensure that air quality concerns are addressed. Only new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significantly unique projects need to undergo a consistency review due to the air quality plan strategy being based on projections from local General Plans.

The proposed project would construct a 132,003-square-foot, three-story, self-storage building and associated site improvements and 20,777 square-feet of landscaping. The proposed project is not considered a project of Statewide, regional, or areawide significance (e.g., large-scale projects such as airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, residential development of more than 500 dwelling units, or shopping centers or business establishments employing more than 1,000 persons or encompassing more than 500,000 square feet of floor space) as defined in the California Code of Regulations (Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 13, §15206(b)). Because the proposed project would not be defined as a regionally significant project under CEQA, it does not meet the SCAG Intergovernmental Review criteria.

The City’s General Plan is consistent with the SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Pursuant to the methodology provided in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the Basin 2022 AQMP is affirmed when a project (1) would not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation, and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. Consistency review is presented as follows:

1. The project would result in short-term construction and long-term operational pollutant emissions that are less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by SCAQMD, as demonstrated below; therefore, the project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new air quality standards violation.

2. The CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant projects.

Projects of statewide, regional, or areawide significance include large-scale projects such as airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, residential developments of more than 500 dwelling units, and shopping centers or business establishments employing more than 1,000 persons or encompassing more than 500,000 square feet of floor space), as defined in CCR Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 13, Section 15206(b). As discussed in the Project Location and Description section, the project site is currently zoned as NC and has a land use designation of Commercial. Per the City Municipal Code Permitted Uses Table 9.02.020-1 in Section 9.02.020,
32 self-storage facilities are not permitted uses in the NC zone. Therefore, the proposed project would require a zone change to change the zoning designation of the project site from NC to CC and a CUP to allow development of the proposed project within the CC zone.

32 City of Moreno Valley. 2024. Permitted Uses Table 9.02.020-1. Website: https://ecode360.com/ attachment/MO4973/MO4973-009a%20Permitted%20Uses%20Table%209.02.020-1.pdf (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 27 The projections in the AQMP for achieving air quality goals are based, in part, on assumptions in SCAG’s RTP/SCS regarding population, housing, and growth trends, as well as assumptions and projections of local planning agencies to determine control strategies for regional compliance status. According to SCAG’s 2024–2050 RTP/SCS, the City’s households and employment are forecasted to increase by approximately 21,900 households and 38,700 jobs, respectively, between 2019 and 2050.33 The City’s General Plan has a year 2040 buildout horizon; however, the General Plan does not specify or anticipate when complete buildout would occur because long-range demographic and economic trends are speculative. The designation within the General Plan of a site for a certain use does not necessarily mean that the site would be developed with that use during the planning period because most development depends on property owner initiative.

Based on information provided by the applicant, proposed project would include up to two employees per shift to operate the facility.34 Therefore, the proposed project has the potential to employ 4 employees, some of which may already reside in Moreno Valley. According to SCAG, up to 4 employees would represent approximately 0.01 percent of the city’s forecast employment growth from 2019 to 2050. Therefore, growth projections of the proposed project would be within the parameters of expected overall growth in the city, and a zone change designation of the site from NC to CC for development of the proposed 132,003-square-foot, three-story, self-storage building would not result in growth in the area or in Moreno Valley beyond that which was planned for by SCAG.

Furthermore, the 2024–2050 RTP/SCS analyzed the region’s transportation system, future growth projections, and potential funding sources in order to develop a long-term framework for transportation improvements and maintenance.35 The RTP includes policies and regulations set forth to ensure that development of transportation infrastructure within the SCAG regional area is within planned and forecast socioeconomic projections in order to achieve federal- and State-mandated regional emissions standards and GHG reduction targets. As part of the RTP, SCAG developed an SCS, which was required by SB 375, the Sustainable Communities Act of 2008. The SCS is intended to combine land use and transportation planning with the overall goal of reducing air pollutant and GHG emissions generated from vehicle travel. The City currently has approximately 5,700 unemployed persons eligible to work.36 Therefore, development of the project site, as proposed, would provide employment opportunities within Moreno Valley and

33 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2024. 2024–2050 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy. Demographics and Growth Forecast, Technical Report, Table 13.

Adopted April 4, 2024.
34 Assumes up to two shifts per day.
35 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2024. 2024-2050 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: A Plan for Navigating to a Brighter Future. April. Website:
https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/23-2987-connect-socal-2024-final-complete- 040424.pdf?1714175547 (accessed March 2025).
36 State of California, Employment Development Department. 2023. Monthly Labor Force and Unemployment Rate for Cities and Census Designated Places. September. Website:
https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Flabormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov %2Ffile%2Flfmonth%2Fsanbrsub.xls&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 28 support the AQMP’s and SCAG’s goal of reducing air pollutant and GHG emissions generated from vehicle travel.

Based on the proposed self-storage building size (132,003 square feet with 20,777 square-feet of landscaping), the project is expected to generate up to 4 employees. Therefore, the proposed project is not considered a project of Statewide, regional, or areawide significance (e.g., large- scale projects such as airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, residential developments of more than 500 dwelling units, and shopping centers or business establishments employing more than 1,000 persons or encompassing more than 500,000 square feet of floor space) as defined in CCR Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Article 13, Section 15206(b).

Because the proposed project would not be defined as a regionally significant project under CEQA, it does not meet SCAG’s Intergovernmental Review criteria.

Based on the analysis above, the proposed project would not represent substantial or unplanned employment or population growth forecasted by SCAG or the AQMP. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan.

Criteria Pollutant Analysis
The Basin is currently designated nonattainment for the federal and State standards for 8-hour O 3 and PM10. The Basin is also nonattainment for the State standard for 1-hour O3. The Basin’s nonattainment status is attributed to the region’s development history. Past, present, and future development projects contribute to the region’s adverse air quality impacts on a cumulative basis.

By its very nature, air pollution is largely a cumulative impact. No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of an ambient air quality standard. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. If a project’s contribution to the cumulative impact is considerable, then the project’s impact on air quality would be considered significant.

In developing thresholds of significance for air pollutants, SCAQMD considered the emission levels for which a project’s individual emissions would be cumulatively considerable. If a project exceeds the identified significance thresholds, its emissions would be cumulatively considerable, resulting in significant adverse air quality impacts to the region’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, additional analysis to assess cumulative impacts is not necessary. The following analysis assesses the potential project-level air quality impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed project.

Construction Emissions. During construction, short-term degradation of air quality may occur due to the release of particulate matter emissions (i.e., fugitive dust) generated by grading, building construction, paving, and other activities. Emissions from construction equipment are also anticipated and would include CO, nitrogen oxides (NO
X), VOCs, directly emitted PM2.5 or PM10, and
TACs such as diesel exhaust particulate matter.

Project construction activities would include grading, site preparation, building construction, architectural coating, and paving activities. Construction-related effects on air quality from the proposed project would be greatest during the site preparation phase due to the disturbance of

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 29 soils. If not properly controlled, these activities would temporarily generate particulate emissions.

Sources of fugitive dust would include disturbed soils at the construction site. Unless properly controlled, vehicles leaving the site would deposit dirt and mud on local streets, which could be an additional source of airborne dust after it dries. PM10 emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the nature and magnitude of construction activity and local weather conditions. PM10 emissions would depend on soil moisture, silt content of soil, wind speed, and amount of operating equipment. Larger dust particles would settle near the source, whereas fine particles would be dispersed over greater distances from the construction site.

Water or other soil stabilizers can be used to control dust, resulting in emission reductions of 50 percent or more. SCAQMD has established Rule 403: Fugitive Dust, which would require the applicant to implement measures that would reduce the amount of particulate matter generated during the construction period. The Rule 403 measures that were incorporated in this analysis include:
• Water active sites at least twice daily (locations where grading is to occur shall be thoroughly watered prior to earthmoving).
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 2 feet (0.6 meter) of freeboard (vertical space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code Section 23114. • Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 mph or less.

In addition to dust-related PM
10 emissions, heavy trucks and construction equipment powered by gasoline and diesel engines would generate CO, sulfur oxides (SOX), NOX, VOCs, and some soot particulate (PM2.5 and PM10) in exhaust emissions. If construction activities were to increase traffic congestion in the area, CO and other emissions from traffic would increase slightly while those vehicles idle in traffic. These emissions would be temporary in nature and limited to the immediate area surrounding the construction site.

Construction emissions were estimated for the project using CalEEMod and are summarized in Table F. CalEEMod output sheets are included in Attachment B.

The results shown in Table F indicate the proposed project would not exceed the significance criteria for daily VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, or PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under applicable NAAQS or CAAQS.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 30 Table F: Short-Term Regional Construction Emissions
Construction Phase Maximum Daily Regional Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) VOCs NOX CO SOX Total PM10 Total PM2.5
Site Preparation 1.3 49.8 36.1 <0.1 9.7 5.1
Grading 0.7 22.0 16.4 <0.1 4.0 2.1
Building Construction 0.8 17.5 17.0 <0.1 1.6 0.8
Architectural Coating 12.4 1.1 1.8 <0.1 0.7 0.1
Paving 0.6 10.4 9.1 <0.1 0.1 0.5
Peak Daily Emissions 13.2 71.8 52.5 <0.1 13.7 7.2
SCAQMD Threshold 75.0 100.0 550.0 150.0 150.0 55.0
Significant? No No No No No No
Source: Compiled by LSA (January 2025).

Note: Maximum emissions occurred during the overlapping of site preparation and grading phases. VOCs maximum emissions occurred during the overlapping of building construction and architectural coating phases.

CO = carbon monoxide
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District
SOX = sulfur oxides
VOCs = volatile organic compounds

Operational Air Quality Impacts. Long-term air pollutant emissions associated with operation of the proposed project include emissions from area, energy, and mobile sources. Area-source emissions include architectural coatings, consumer products, and landscaping. Energy-source emissions would typically result from activities in buildings that use natural gas. The proposed project would be all electric; therefore, the proposed project would not generate energy source emissions. Mobile- source emissions result from vehicle trips associated with operation of the project.

Mobile source emissions include VOC and NOX emissions that contribute to the formation of O3.

Additionally, PM10 emissions result from running exhaust, tire and brake wear, and the entrainment of dust into the atmosphere from vehicles traveling on paved roadways.

Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project were calculated using CalEEMod. Table G provides the estimated existing emission estimates and the proposed project’s estimated operational emissions. CalEEMod output sheets are included in Attachment B.

The results shown in Table G indicate the proposed project would not exceed the significance criteria for daily VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, or PM2.5 emissions. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under applicable NAAQS or CAAQS.

Table G: Long-Term Regional Operational Emissions
Emission Type Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
VOCs NOX CO SOX Total PM10 Total PM2.5
Mobile Sources 0.8 0.7 5.6 <0.1 1.2 0.3
Area Sources 4.1 <0.1 5.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 31 Energy Sources 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Project Emissions 4.9 0.7 11.3 <0.1 1.2 0.3
SCAQMD Threshold 55.0 55.0 550.0 150.0 150.0 55.0
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No
Source: Compiled by LSA (January 2025).

Note: Some values may not appear to add correctly due to rounding.

CO = carbon monoxide
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns diameter PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District
SOX = sulfur oxides
VOCs = volatile organic compounds

Long-Term Microscale (CO Hot Spot) Analysis. Vehicular trips associated with the proposed project would contribute to congestion at intersections and along roadway segments in the vicinity of the proposed project site. Localized air quality impacts would occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase as a result of the proposed project. The primary mobile-source pollutant of local concern is CO, a direct function of vehicle idling time and, thus, of traffic flow conditions. CO transport is extremely limited; under normal meteorological conditions, it disperses rapidly with distance from the source. However, under certain extreme meteorological conditions, CO concentrations near a congested roadway or intersection may reach unhealthful levels, thereby affecting local sensitive receptors (e.g., residents, schoolchildren, the elderly, and hospital patients).

Typically, high CO concentrations are associated with roadways or intersections operating at unacceptable levels of service (LOS) or with extremely high traffic volumes. In areas with high ambient background CO concentrations, modeling is recommended to determine a project’s effect on local CO levels.

An assessment of project-related impacts on localized ambient air quality requires that future ambient air quality levels be projected. Existing CO concentrations in the immediate project vicinity are not available. Ambient CO levels monitored at the Lake Elsinore Monitoring station located at 506 West Flint Street (the closest station to the project site that monitors CO) showed a highest recorded 1-hour concentration of 1.3 ppm (the State standard is 20 ppm) and a highest 8-hour concentration of 0.8 ppm (the State standard is 9 ppm) from 2021 to 2023. The highest CO concentrations would normally occur during peak traffic hours; hence, CO impacts calculated under peak traffic conditions represent a worst-case analysis. Reduced speeds and vehicular congestion at intersections result in increased CO emissions.

The proposed project is expected to generate 216 average daily trips, with 14 trips occurring in the a.m. peak hour and 22 trips occurring in the p.m. peak hour. Because t he proposed project would
generate less than 400 daily trips, it is screened out from a VMT analysis and presumed to have less than significant transportation impact.37 Therefore, given the extremely low level of CO concentrations in the project area and the lack of traffic impacts at any intersections, project-related vehicles are not expected to result in CO concentrations exceeding the State or federal CO standards. No CO hot

37 LSA. 2024. Trip Generation and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis for the Public Storage Moreno Valley Project (LSA Project No. 20241908). October 16.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 32 spots would occur, and the project would not result in any project-related impacts on CO concentrations.

Health Risk on Nearby Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are defined as residential uses, schools, daycare centers, nursing homes, and medical centers. Individuals particularly vulnerable to diesel particulate matter are children, whose lung tissue is still developing, and the elderly, who may have serious health problems that can be aggravated by exposure to diesel particulate matter. The nearest sensitive receptors include the single-family residences along Pheasant Knoll Lane that are located within 50 feet to the east of the project site (measured from the project site boundary to the center of the nearest residence).

Project construction and operation emissions were compared to the LST screening tables in SRA 24, based on a 25-meter source-receptor distance and a disturbed acreage of 3.5 acres for construction and an operational project site threshold of 3.0 acres. Table H shows the results of the LST analysis during project operation.

Table H: Project Localized Construction and Operational Emissions Source Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Construction Emissions
On-Site Emissions 49.7 35.2 8.3 4.0
Localized Significance Threshold 220.0 1,230.0 10.0 6.0 Significant? No No No No
Operational Emissions
On-Site Emissions 0.7 6.0 <0.1 <0.1
Localized Significance Threshold 203.0 1,114.0 2.7 1.3
Significant? No No No No
Source: Compiled by LSA (January 2025).

Note: Source Receptor Area 24, based on a 3.5-acre construction disturbance daily area and a 3-acre disturbance area for operation, at a distance of 25 meters from the project boundary to the nearest sensitive receptor.

CO = carbon monoxide
lbs/day = pounds per day
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter

By design, the localized impacts analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the CalEEMod outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst-case scenario assessment, the emissions detailed in Table H assume that all area, stationary, and energy source emissions would occur on site, and 5 percent of the project-related new mobile sources (which is an estimate of the amount of project-related on-site vehicle travel) would occur on site. The 5 percent assumption is conservative because the localized impacts analysis only includes on-site sources and the majority of vehicle travel would occur off site, resulting in emissions that would also be released off site. Table H indicates the localized operational emissions would not exceed the LSTs at nearby residences. Therefore, the proposed operational activity would not result in a locally significant air quality impact.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 33 As detailed in Table H, the emission levels indicate that the project would not exceed SCAQMD LSTs during project construction or operation. The project’s peak operational on-site NOX emissions are approximately less than 1 pound per day. Due to the small size of the proposed project in relation to the overall Basin, the level of emissions is not sufficiently high to use a regional modeling program to correlate health effects on a Basin-wide level. On a regional scale, the quantity of emissions from the project is incrementally minor. Because the SCAQMD has not identified any other methods to quantify health impacts from small projects, and due to the size of the project, it is speculative to assign any specific health effects to small project-related emissions. However, based on this localized analysis, the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Therefore, the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial levels of pollutant concentrations.

Furthermore, as detailed in the Health Risk Assessment
38 prepared for the proposed project,
the maximum cancer risk levels would be 13.18 in 1 million, which would exceed the SCAQMD cancer risk threshold of 10 in 1 million. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1, which would require the use of cleaner construction equipment, would be necessary to reduce substantial pollutant concentrations during project construction. Mitigation Measure AIR-1 would require all off-road diesel-powered construction equipment of 50 horsepower or more to meet CARB’s Tier 2 emission standards and be equipped with Level 3 Diesel Particulate filters or equivalent. With implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1, the cancer risk levels would be reduced to 2.15 in 1 million, which would not exceed the SCAQMD cancer risk of 10 in 1 million.

Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1, construction of the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds and would not expose nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Once the proposed project is constructed, the proposed project would not be a source of substantial emissions. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in new sources of TACs. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1, the project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial levels of TACs.

Odors
Heavy-duty equipment on the project site during construction would emit odors, primarily from equipment exhaust. However, the construction activity would cease after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project.

The proposed project would comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 regarding odors and sources that could cause nuisances. SCAQMD Rule 402 states: “A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.” The proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. The proposed project would also include trash enclosures, which would reduce any potential for odors from project-related waste. Therefore, the

38 LSA. 2025. Health Risk Assessment for the Moreno Valley Public Storage. March.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 34 proposed project would not result in other emissions (e.g., those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people.

Naturally Occurring Asbestos
The project is in Riverside County, which is among the counties found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils.39 However, according to the California Geological Survey, no such rock has been identified in the vicinity of the project site. When demolition is proposed during construction, the demolition of existing buildings may expose asbestos used in building materials.

However, the proposed project would not involve any demolition or renovation because no current development exists on the project site. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos during project construction is small and would not be significant.

Energy Use
This section discusses energy use resulting from implementation of the proposed project and evaluates whether the proposed project would result in the wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources or conflict with any applicable plans for renewable energy and energy efficiency.

Construction
The anticipated construction schedule assumes that the proposed project would be built in approximately 12 months. Construction-specific phases were assessed for their energy consumption under each construction sub-phase: grading, site preparation, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities.

Construction would require energy for the manufacture and transportation of construction materials, preparation of the site for grading and building activities, and construction of the building.

All or most of this energy would be derived from nonrenewable resources. Petroleum fuels (e.g., diesel and gasoline) would be the primary sources of energy for these activities. However, construction activities are not anticipated to result in an inefficient use of energy as gasoline and diesel fuel would be supplied by construction contractors who would conserve the use of their supplies to minimize their costs on the project. Energy (i.e., fuel) usage on the project site during construction would be temporary in nature and would be relatively small in comparison to the State’s available energy sources.

Operation
Energy use associated with the proposed project would consist of electricity and vehicle fuel use associated with project operations.

Table I shows the estimated potential increased electricity, gasoline, and diesel demand associated with the proposed project. The electricity rates are from the CalEEMod analysis, while the gasoline and diesel rates are based on the traffic analysis in conjunction with USDOT fuel efficiency data and

39 California Department of Conservation (DOC). n.d. California Geological Survey. Asbestos. Website:
https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/minerals/mineral-hazards (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 35 using the USEPA’s fuel economy estimates for 2020, and the California diesel fuel economy estimates for 2021.

Table I: Estimated Annual Energy Use of Proposed Project Electricity Use (kWh/yr) Natural Gas Use (kBTU/yr) Gasoline (gal/yr) Diesel (gal/yr) Proposed Project 629,861 0 20,559 14,752
Source: Compiled by LSA (January 2025).
gal/yr = gallons per year
kBTU/yr = thousand British thermal units per year
kWh/yr = kilowatt-hours per year

As shown in Table I, the estimated increase in electricity demand associated with the operation of the proposed project would be 629,861 kWh per year. Total electricity consumption in Riverside County in 2022 was 17,780,573,271 kWh;40 therefore, operation of the proposed project would negligibly increase the annual electricity consumption in Riverside County by approximately less than 0.1 percent.

The project would also result in energy usage associated with motor vehicle gasoline to fuel project- related trips. As shown above in Table I, the proposed project would result in the consumption of 20,559 gallons of gasoline and 14,752 gallons of diesel per year. Based on fuel consumption obtained from EMFAC2021, approximately 744.5 million gallons of gasoline and approximately 301.2 million gallons of diesel will be consumed from vehicle trips in Riverside County in 2026.

Therefore, vehicle trips associated with the proposed project would increase the annual fuel use in Riverside County by approximately less than 0.1 percent for gasoline fuel usage and approximately less than 0.1 percent for diesel fuel usage. The proposed project would result in fuel usage that is a small fraction of current annual fuel usage in Riverside County, and fuel consumption associated with vehicle trips generated by project operations would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary in comparison to other similar developments in the region. Therefore, gasoline demand generated by vehicle trips associated with the proposed project would be a minimal fraction of gasoline and diesel fuel consumption in California.

Furthermore, the proposed project would be constructed using energy efficient modern building materials and construction practices, and the proposed project also would use new modern appliances and equipment, in accordance with the Appliance Efficiency Regulations (CCR Title 24, Sections 1601 through 1608). The expected energy consumption during construction and operation of the proposed project would be consistent with typical usage rates for public self-storage uses; however, energy consumption is largely a function of personal choice and the physical structure and layout of buildings. As such, the proposed project would not result in a potential significant impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation.

40 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2022. Electricity Consumption by County. Website:
www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 36 Conflict with or Obstruction of a State or Local Plan for Renewable Energy or Energy Efficiency The CEC recently adopted the 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report.41 The 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report provides the results of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will require action if the State is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining energy reliability and controlling costs. The 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report covers a broad range of topics, including decarbonizing buildings, integrating renewables, energy efficiency, energy equity, integrating renewable energy, updates on Southern California electricity reliability, climate adaptation activities for the energy sector, natural gas assessment, transportation energy demand forecasts, and the California Energy Demand Forecast.

As indicated above, energy usage on the project site during construction would be temporary in nature and would be relatively small in comparison to the State’s available energy sources. In addition, energy usage associated with operation of the proposed project would be relatively small in comparison to the region’s available energy sources, and energy impacts would be negligible at the regional level. Because California’s energy conservation planning actions are conducted at a regional level, and because the project’s total impact on regional energy supplies would be minor, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct California’s energy conservation plans as described in the CEC’s 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report. Therefore, the proposed project would not lead to new or substantially more severe energy impacts.

Greenhouse Gas Emission Impacts
The following sections describe the proposed project’s construction- and operation-related GHG impacts and consistency with applicable GHG reduction plans.

Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
This section describes the proposed project’s construction- and operation-related GHG emissions and contribution to global climate change. The SCAQMD has not addressed emission thresholds for construction in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook; however, SCAQMD requires quantification and disclosure. Thus, this section discusses construction emissions.

Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would produce combustion emissions from various sources. Construction would emit GHGs through the operation of construction equipment and from worker and builder supply vendor vehicles for the duration of the approximately 12-month construction period. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHGs such as CO2, CH4, and N2O. Furthermore, the fueling of heavy equipment emits CH4. Exhaust emissions from on-site construction activities would vary daily as construction activity levels change.

As indicated above, SCAQMD does not have an adopted threshold of significance for construction- related GHG emissions. However, lead agencies are required to quantify and disclose GHG emissions

41 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2023. 2023 Integrated Energy Policy Report. California Energy Commission. Docket Number: 23-IEPR-01.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 37 that would occur during construction. The SCAQMD then requires the construction GHG emissions to be amortized over the life of the project (which is defined as 30 years), added to the operational emissions, and compared to the applicable interim GHG significance threshold tier. Based on CalEEMod, it is estimated that the project would generate 447.97 MT CO2e during construction of the project. When amortized over the 30-year life of the project, annual emissions would be 14.9 MT CO2e.

Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Long-term operation of the proposed project would generate GHG emissions from area, mobile, waste, and water sources, as well as indirect emissions from sources associated with energy consumption. Mobile-source GHG emissions would include project-generated vehicle trips associated with trips to the proposed project. Area-source emissions would be associated with activities such as landscaping and maintenance on the project site and other sources. Waste-source emissions generated by the proposed project include energy generated by landfilling and other methods of disposal related to transporting and managing project-generated waste. In addition, water-source emissions associated with the proposed project are generated by water supply and conveyance, water treatment, water distribution, and wastewater treatment.

GHG emissions were estimated using CalEEMod. Table J shows the estimated operational GHG emissions for the proposed project. Motor vehicle emissions are the largest source of GHG emissions for the project, at approximately 43 percent of the project total. Energy sources are the next largest category, at approximately 30 percent. Water and waste sources are about 18 percent and 8 percent of the total emissions, respectively. Area-source emissions also make up less than 1 percent of the total emissions.

As discussed above, a project would have less than significant GHG emissions if it would result in operational GHG emissions of less than 3,000 MT CO
2e/yr. Based on the analysis results, the
proposed project would result in approximately 517.5MT CO2e/yr, which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/yr. Therefore, operation of the proposed project does not have the potential to generate significant GHG emissions that would have a significant effect on the environment.

Table J: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emission Type Operational Emissions (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percentage of Total
Mobile Source 212.8 <0.1 <0.1 216.7 43.1
Area Source 2.7 <0.1 <0.1 2.7 <1
Energy Source 152.0 <0.1 <0.1 152.6 30.3
Water Source 60.2 1.0 <0.1 92.3 18.3
Waste Source 11.1 1.1 0.0 38.7 7.7
Total Operational Emissions 503.0 100.0
Amortized Construction Emissions 14.9 —
Total Annual Emissions 517.5 —

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 38 Table J: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Emission Type Operational Emissions (MT/yr)
CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percentage of Total
SCAQMD Threshold 3,000
Exceedance? No
Source: Compiled by LSA (January 2025).

CH4 = methane
CO2 = carbon dioxide
CO2e = carbon dioxide equivalent
GHG = greenhouse gas
MT/CO2e = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MT/yr = metric tons per year
N2O = nitrous oxide
SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District

Consistency with Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plans
The following discussion evaluates the proposed project according to the goals of the City’s CAP, the 2022 Scoping Plan, and SCAG’s 2024–2050 RTP/SCS.

City of Moreno Valley CAP. The City of Moreno Valley adopted the CAP on June 15, 2021.42 The City’s CAP is designed to reinforce the City’s commitment to reducing GHG emissions and demonstrate how the City will comply with State of California’s GHG emission reduction standards.

The CAP has been prepared concurrently with the updated Moreno Valley General Plan, reflecting the City’s most current land use and transportation strategy, and GHG implications of various General Plan’s goals and policies. While there is no sunset year for the CAP, the CAP provides analysis of GHG emissions to the year 2040, which is the General Plan horizon year. The following reduction measures from the City’s CAP will be applicable to the proposed project:
• Implement trip reduction programs in new residential, commercial, and mixed-use developments.
• Expand efforts to install energy efficient lighting technologies in new and existing private parking lots.
• Facilitate energy efficiency improvements in nonresidential buildings through incentives and regulations that may include energy performance reports, time of sale upgrades, and/or innovative partnerships such as expansion of utility provider (e.g., MVU, SCE, SoCalGas) programs to reduce energy use.
• Encourage residents and businesses to use efficient lawn and garden maintenance equipment or to reduce the need for landscape maintenance through native planting. • Reduce emissions from heavy-duty construction equipment by limiting idling based on SCAQMD requirements and utilizing cleaner fuels, equipment, and vehicles.

42 City of Moreno Valley. 2021. City of Moreno Valley Climate Action Plan. June 15. Website:
https://moval.gov/city_hall/general-plan2040/MV-CAP.pdf (accessed March 2025)

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 39 • Require new landscaping to be climate appropriate.

The proposed project would construct a 132,003-square-foot, three-story, self-storage facility and associated site improvements including 20,777 square-feet of landscaping. The proposed project would be consistent with the CAP goal of increasing energy efficiency in new buildings by complying with the latest California Building Code (Title 24), including the latest CALGreen Code standards. In addition, the proposed project would comply with local and State laws regarding solar energy and would be designed to be all-electric, consistent with the CAP goals. The proposed project would also use drought tolerant landscaping that requires low water and maintenance. Therefore, the project would also be consistent with the CAP goal of climate appropriate landscaping. Based on the proposed project traffic study, the proposed project would be screened out from a VMT analysis and presumed to have less than significant transportation impact. Therefore, the proposed project would not be implementing a trip reduction program. As such, the proposed project would be generally consistent with applicable CAP measures.
2022 Scoping Plan. EO B-30-15 added the immediate target of reducing GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. SB 32 affirms the importance of addressing climate change by codifying into statute the GHG emissions reduction target of at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 contained in EO B-30-15. CARB released the 2017 Scoping Plan to reflect the 2030 target set by EO B-30-15 and codified by SB 32.43 SB 32 builds on AB 32 and keeps us on the path toward achieving the State’s 2050 objective of reducing emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. AB 197, the companion bill to SB 32, provides additional direction to CARB that is related to the adoption of strategies to reduce GHG emissions. Additional direction in AB 197 that is intended to provide easier public access to air emission data collected by CARB was posted in December 2016. AB 1279 codifies the State goals of achieving net carbon neutrality by 2045 and maintaining net negative GHG emissions thereafter.

In addition, the 2022 Scoping Plan
44 assesses progress toward the statutory 2030 target while laying out a path to achieving carbon neutrality no later than 2045. The 2022 Scoping Plan focuses on outcomes needed to achieve carbon neutrality by assessing paths for clean technology, energy deployment, natural and working lands, and others, and is designed to meet the State’s long-term climate objectives and support a range of economic, environmental, energy security, environmental justice, and public health priorities.
• Energy-efficient measures are intended to maximize energy-efficiency building and appliance standards, pursue additional efficiency efforts (including new technologies and new policy and implementation mechanisms), and pursue comparable investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California. In addition, these measures are designed to expand the use of green building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of California’s new and existing inventory of buildings. As mentioned above, the proposed project would not be powered by natural gas, and no natural gas demand is anticipated during construction or

43 California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2022a. 2022 Scoping Plan for Achieving Carbon Neutrality.

December. Website: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2023-04/2022-sp.pdfpdf (accessed March 2025).
44 California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2017. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. November.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 40 operation of the proposed project. The elimination of natural gas in new development would help projects implement their “fair share” of achieving long-term 2045 carbon neutrality consistent with State goals. As such, if a project does not utilize natural gas, a lead agency can conclude that it would be consistent with achieving the 2045 neutrality goal and will not have a cumulative considerable impact on climate change.45 In addition, the proposed project would comply with the latest Title 24 standards regarding energy conservation and green building standards. The project would also include solar roof areas, which would allow for future use of renewable energy. Therefore, the proposed project would comply with applicable energy measures.
• Water conservation and efficiency measures are intended to continue efficiency programs and use cleaner energy sources to move and treat water. Increasing the efficiency of water transport and reducing water use would reduce GHG emissions. As noted above, the project would be required to comply with the latest Title 24 standards, which include a variety of different measures, including reduction of wastewater and water use. The proposed project would also include new drought tolerant landscaping that requires low water and maintenance. In addition, the proposed project would be required to comply with the California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any of the water conservation and efficiency measures.
• The goal of transportation and motor vehicle measures is to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets for passenger vehicles. Specific regional emission targets for transportation emissions would not directly apply to the proposed project. However, vehicles traveling to the project site would comply with the Pavley II (LEV III) Advanced Clean Cars Program (Pavley standards). The second phase of Pavley standards will reduce GHG emissions from new cars by 34 percent from 2016 levels by 2025, resulting in a 3 percent decrease in average vehicle emissions for all vehicles by 2020. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the identified transportation and motor vehicle measures.

The proposed project would comply with existing State regulations adopted to achieve the overall GHG emission reduction goals identified in the 2022 Scoping Plan, EO B-30-15, SB 32, AB 197, and AB 1279.

SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. SCAG’s 2024–2050 RTP/SCS identifies land use strategies that focus on new housing and job growth in areas served by high-quality transit, and other opportunity areas would be consistent with a land use development pattern that supports and complements the proposed transportation network. The core vision in the 2024–2050 RTP/SCS is to better manage the existing transportation system through design management strategies, integrate land use decisions and technological advancements, create complete streets that are safe for all roadway users, preserve the transportation system, expand transit, and foster development in transit-oriented communities. The 2024–2050 RTP/SCS contains

45 Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2022. Justification Report: CEQA Thresholds for Evaluating the Significance of Climate Impacts From Land Use Projects and Plans. April. Website:
https://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/california-environmental-quality-act-ceqa/updated-ceqa- guidelines (accessed March 2025).

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 41 transportation projects to help more efficiently distribute population, housing, and employment growth, as well as providing a forecast development pattern that is generally consistent with regional-level General Plan data. The forecast development pattern, when integrated with the financially constrained transportation investments identified in the 2024–2050 RTP/SCS, would reach the regional target of reducing GHG emissions from automobiles and light-duty trucks by 8 percent per capita by 2020 and 19 percent by 2035 (compared to 2005 levels). The 2024–2050 RTP/SCS does not require that local General Plans, Specific Plans, or zoning be consistent with the 2024–2050 RTP/SCS, but it provides incentives for consistency for governments and developers.

Implementing SCAG’s RTP/SCS will greatly reduce the regional GHG emissions from transportation, thereby helping to achieve statewide emissions reduction targets. The proposed project would construct a 132,003 square foot public self-storage building and associated site improvements. As demonstrated in the Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plans section above, the proposed project does not meet the criteria identified in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15205.b.2 (Projects of Statewide, Regional, or Areawide Significance) for projects of Statewide, regional, or areawide significance. The proposed project would require a zone change to change the zoning designation of the project site from NC to CC and a CUP to allow development of the proposed project within the CC zone. The proposed project has the potential to employ 4 employees, some of which may already reside in Moreno Valley. According to SCAG’s 2024–2050 RTP/SCS, Moreno Valley households and employment are forecasted to increase by approximately 21,900 households and 38,700 jobs, respectively, between 2019 and 2050.
46 According to SCAG, up to 4 employees would represent approximately 0.01 percent of the city’s forecast employment growth from 2019 to 2050. As such, the proposed project would not interfere with SCAG’s ability to achieve the region’s GHG reduction target of 19 percent below 2005 per capita emissions levels by 2035. Furthermore, the proposed project is not regionally significant per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15206 and, as such, it would not conflict with the SCAG RTP/SCS targets because those targets were established and are applicable on a regional level. Therefore, it is anticipated that implementation of the proposed project would not interfere with SCAG’s ability to implement the regional strategies outlined in the RTP/SCS.

The proposed project would be consistent with applicable plans and programs designed to reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions.

CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis presented above, construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in the generation of criteria air pollutants that would exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403: Fugitive Dust would further reduce construction dust impacts. The proposed project is not expected to produce significant emissions that would affect nearby sensitive receptors. The project would also be consistent with the 2022 AQMP. The project would not result in objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. The

46 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2024. 2024–2050 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy. Demographics and Growth Forecast, Technical Report, Table 13.

Adopted April 4, 2024.

3/11/25 P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx 42 proposed project would also not result in a potential significant impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation. As demonstrated above, GHG emissions released during construction and operation of the project would not lead to new or substantially more severe significant impacts associated with operational GHG emissions. The proposed project would also be generally consistent with the City’s CAP, the 2022 Scoping Plan, and the SCAG RTP/SCS.

Attachments: A: Figures
B: CalEEMod Output Files

A IR Q UALITY , E NERGY , AND G REENHOUSE G AS T ECHNICAL M EMORANDUM M ARCH 2025

M ORENO V ALLEY P UBLIC S TORAGE P ROJECT

M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx (03/11/25)

ATTACHMENT A

FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional and Project Location
Figure 2: Site Plan

SS S
FD
FD
FD
T
GATE

DUAL BIN
TRASH
5 OFFICE
LOBBY
17 23
11 3-STORY
132,003 SF

RV PARKING
52 SPACES
GATE

PROPOSED SELF STORAGE
(N) 6' HIGH CMU WALL AT REAR (N) 6' HIGH CMU WALL AT REAR (N) 6' HIGH CMU WALL AT REAR
7' H. FENCING
7' HIGH FENCING
6 BIKES
35'
15'
10' SETBACK
+5' FOR EVERY
10'
BLDG HT.

OVER 30'
6'311'-4"
29'

FIRE AERIAL

SETBACK
18' 36'
40'BLDG SETBACK

EQUALS HEIGHT OF BLDG
141'-4"
ELEC
3 ACCESS EASEMENT

I N D I A N S T R E E T
18'
TYP
9'
TYP
8'9'
40' BLDG SETBACKEQUALS HEIGHT

OF BLDG

ACCESSIBLE PATH

OF TRAVEL FROM

PUBLIC R/W
20'
TYP
5'-6"
58' 33'-9"
40'
TYP
4 4.5% MAX RAMP
16'-4"
36'-1"
10'-10"34'-11"
26'

FIRE ACCESS
28'-6"
FIRE
AERIAL

SETBACK
26'

FIRE AERIAL

ACCESS ROADWAY
R24'
R46'
32'
30'
TYP
12'TYP
12'TYP
TRAVEL DISTANCE = 248'
TRAVEL DISTANCE = 145'
EXIT DISTANCE = 238'
EXIT DISTANCE = 130'
5'-4"16'-4"
196'-8"

TO PROPERTY LINE
45'-1"

EV CAPABLE SP

EV CAPABLE SP

EV CAPABLE SP

EV CAPABLE SP
10'LS
FIRE

UNDERGROUND

INFILTRATION SYSTEM
171'-6"
12'-2" 9'
TYP
10'
LS
18'
TYP
5'-6"
0" CURB ONLY

AT LOBBY
12'
12'
EV VAN
5'
0" CURB

TRANSITION TO

FULL HT CURB

OUTSIDE OF

LOBBY, TYP
0" CURB
F.F. 1581.6
(1579.8 TC)
(1579.3 FS)
2:1 SLOPE
2:1 SLOPE
DAS
8'-6"
8'-6"
LOBBY
1 3CY 3CY
7' H. FENCING
40'
SLOPE

ENCLOSURE W/ SOLID ROOF COVER
PER CITY STD. MVGF-660B-1
CMU WALL: ANGELUS BLOCK,

PLACER CREEK SPLIT-FACE
86'-7"
18'
6'-6"

EXISTING

SIDEWALK
R-5 ZONE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R-5 ZONE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R-5 ZONE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R-5 ZONE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R-5 ZONE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R-5 ZONE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R-5 ZONE

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
R-5 ZONE

CC ZONE

SELF-STORAGE FACILITY

NC ZONE

AUTO ZONE STORENC ZONE

GAS STATION

CC ZONE

RETAIL CENTRE
37'-6"TYP
10'
5'
196'
34'

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DEPLOYMENT AREA
34'-0" x 60'-0" MIN.

PROVIDED
35'-0" x 196'-0"
312'-8"
34'
(E) NEIGHBORS' WOOD FENCE(E) NEIGHBOR'S CONC. WALL
(N) 7' HIGH FENCING

TUBULAR STEEL
(E) NEIGHBOR'S
CONC. WALL

FIRE DEPARTMENT

DEPLOYMENT AREA
34'-0" x 60'-0" MIN.

PROVIDED 35'-0" x 312'-8"
(E) NEIGHBOR'S WOOD FENCE
BLACK "TENNIS COURT" PRIVACY FENCE
WINDSCREEN (BLOCK VISIBILITY 95%)
WITH GROMMETS AT 12" ON CENTER,
WIND VENTS AT 10'-0" ON CENTER,

AND UV RESISTANT FASTENERS

ACCESS IN & OUT

KEY PADS

ACCESS IN & OUT

KEY PADS

ALL STEP OUTS

SHALL BE
12"+6" CURB
SHEET 2NORTH
ALESSANDRO & INDIAN STREET | MORENO VALLEY, CA
SUBMITTAL 01
SUBMITTAL 02 01.21.2025

10.25.2024

CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN

01.21.25 0 20'10' 40'5'
scale: 1" = 20'-0"
1TYPICAL 6' HIGH CMU WALL SCALE:NONE
6' HIGH CMU WALL
WITH 4" WALL CAP:

ANGELUS BLOCKS PLACER CREEK

SPLIT-FACE, APPLY SEALER
BLACK "TENNIS COURT" PRIVACY FENCE
WINDSCREEN (BLOCK VISIBILITY 95%)

PROPOSED SELF-STORAGE
3-STORY
132,003 SF

RV PARKING
52 SPACES
FEET
80400
FIGURE 2
I:\2024\20241908\G\Site_Plan.ai (1/29/2025)
SOURCE: KSP Studios
Public Storage Moreno Valley
Site Plan

A IR Q UALITY , E NERGY , AND G REENHOUSE G AS T ECHNICAL M EMORANDUM M ARCH 2025

M ORENO V ALLEY P UBLIC S TORAGE P ROJECT

M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA

P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\AQ-GHG\Product\Moreno Valley Public Storage AQ_E_GHG Memo_030625_clean.docx (03/11/25)

ATTACHMENT B

CALEEMOD OUTPUT FILES
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 1 / 66
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated

2.3. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Mitigated

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated

3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 2 / 66

3.4. Grading (2025) - Mitigated

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated

3.6. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated

3.8. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated

3.9. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated

3.10. Paving (2026) - Mitigated

3.11. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated

3.12. Architectural Coating (2026) - Mitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.1.2. Mitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 3 / 66

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated

4.3.2. Mitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated

4.4.2. Mitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated

4.5.2. Mitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.6.2. Mitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.7.2. Mitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.8.2. Mitigated
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 4 / 66

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.9.2. Mitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.2.2. Mitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.3.2. Mitigated
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 5 / 66

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.9.2. Mitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 6 / 66

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.11.2. Mitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.12.2. Mitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.13.2. Mitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.14.2. Mitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.15.2. Mitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 7 / 66

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1.2. Mitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2.2. Mitigated

8. User Changes to Default Data
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 8 / 66

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Public Storage Moreno Valley v3
Construction Start Date 11/4/2025
Operational Y ear 2026
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.50
Precipitation (days) 10.0
Location 33.91861051541407, -117.23448767025208
County Riverside-South Coast
City Moreno Valley
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5591
EDFZ 11
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.29

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
132 1000sqft 2.42 132,003 20,777 — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 9 / 66
Parking Lot 65.0 Space 0.58 0.00 0.00 — — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector Sector # Measure Title
Transportation T-14* Provide Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure * Qualitative or supporting measure. Emission reductions not included in the mitigated emissions results.

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.2 18.6 18.7 0.03 0.73 1.05 1.78 0.67 0.25 0.93 — 3,903 3,903 0.15 0.15 3,957 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 13.0 71.8 52.5 0.10 1.91 11.9 13.8 1.73 5.55 7.28 — 11,527 11,527 0.43 0.36 11,645 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.84 9.94 9.28 0.02 0.38 0.60 0.90 0.35 0.27 0.48 — 2,004 2,004 0.06 0.08 2,030 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.70 1.81 1.69 < 0.005 0.07 0.11 0.17 0.06 0.05 0.09 — 332 332 0.01 0.01 336

2.2. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 10 / 66
Y ear ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 13.2 18.6 18.7 0.03 0.73 1.05 1.78 0.67 0.25 0.93 — 3,903 3,903 0.15 0.15 3,957 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 2.01 71.8 52.5 0.10 1.91 11.9 13.8 1.73 5.55 7.28 — 11,527 11,527 0.43 0.36 11,645 2026 13.0 17.5 16.0 0.03 0.66 0.91 1.57 0.61 0.22 0.83 — 3,556 3,556 0.11 0.15 3,602 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.12 3.90 2.94 0.01 0.11 0.60 0.71 0.10 0.27 0.37 — 667 667 0.02 0.03 675 2026 3.84 9.94 9.28 0.02 0.38 0.52 0.90 0.35 0.13 0.48 — 2,004 2,004 0.06 0.08 2,030 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.02 0.71 0.54 < 0.005 0.02 0.11 0.13 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 110 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 112 2026 0.70 1.81 1.69 < 0.005 0.07 0.10 0.17 0.06 0.02 0.09 — 332 332 0.01 0.01 336

2.3. Construction Emissions by Y ear, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Y ear ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2026 13.2 18.6 18.7 0.03 0.73 1.05 1.78 0.67 0.25 0.93 — 3,903 3,903 0.15 0.15 3,957 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 2.01 71.8 52.5 0.10 1.91 11.9 13.8 1.73 5.55 7.28 — 11,527 11,527 0.43 0.36 11,645 2026 13.0 17.5 16.0 0.03 0.66 0.91 1.57 0.61 0.22 0.83 — 3,556 3,556 0.11 0.15 3,602 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 11 / 66
2025 0.12 3.90 2.94 0.01 0.11 0.60 0.71 0.10 0.27 0.37 — 667 667 0.02 0.03 675 2026 3.84 9.94 9.28 0.02 0.38 0.52 0.90 0.35 0.13 0.48 — 2,004 2,004 0.06 0.08 2,030 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2025 0.02 0.71 0.54 < 0.005 0.02 0.11 0.13 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 110 110 < 0.005 < 0.005 112 2026 0.70 1.81 1.69 < 0.005 0.07 0.10 0.17 0.06 0.02 0.09 — 332 332 0.01 0.01 336

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.93 0.67 11.4 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.16 0.02 0.29 0.31 125 2,602 2,727 12.8 0.22 3,117 Mit. 4.93 0.67 11.4 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.16 0.02 0.29 0.31 125 2,602 2,727 12.8 0.22 3,117 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.93 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,497 2,623 12.8 0.22 3,008 Mit. 3.93 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,497 2,623 12.8 0.22 3,008 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 4.57 0.71 8.94 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,525 2,651 12.8 0.22 3,038 Mit. 4.57 0.71 8.94 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,525 2,651 12.8 0.22 3,038 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 12 / 66
Unmit. 0.83 0.13 1.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 20.8 418 439 2.12 0.04 503 Mit. 0.83 0.13 1.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 20.8 418 439 2.12 0.04 503 %
Reduced
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.83 0.62 5.62 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,355 1,355 0.06 0.06 1,380 Area 4.11 0.05 5.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.7 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921 Water — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Total 4.93 0.67 11.4 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.16 0.02 0.29 0.31 125 2,602 2,727 12.8 0.22 3,117 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.77 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,274 1,274 0.06 0.07 1,295 Area 3.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921 Water — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Total 3.93 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,497 2,623 12.8 0.22 3,008 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.76 0.68 5.01 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,286 1,286 0.06 0.07 1,309 Area 3.81 0.03 3.93 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 16.2 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 13 / 66
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921 Water — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Total 4.57 0.71 8.94 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,525 2,651 12.8 0.22 3,038 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.14 0.12 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 213 213 0.01 0.01 217 Area 0.70 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.69 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 153 Water — — — — — — — — — — 9.68 50.6 60.2 1.00 0.02 92.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 11.1 0.00 11.1 1.11 0.00 38.7 Total 0.83 0.13 1.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 20.8 418 439 2.12 0.04 503

2.6. Operations Emissions by Sector, Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.83 0.62 5.62 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,355 1,355 0.06 0.06 1,380 Area 4.11 0.05 5.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.7 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921 Water — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Total 4.93 0.67 11.4 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.16 0.02 0.29 0.31 125 2,602 2,727 12.8 0.22 3,117 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.77 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,274 1,274 0.06 0.07 1,295 Area 3.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 14 / 66
Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921 Water — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Total 3.93 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,497 2,623 12.8 0.22 3,008 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.76 0.68 5.01 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,286 1,286 0.06 0.07 1,309 Area 3.81 0.03 3.93 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 16.2 16.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 16.2 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921 Water — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Waste — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Total 4.57 0.71 8.94 0.01 0.02 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 125 2,525 2,651 12.8 0.22 3,038 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.14 0.12 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 213 213 0.01 0.01 217 Area 0.70 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.69 Energy 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 153 Water — — — — — — — — — — 9.68 50.6 60.2 1.00 0.02 92.3 Waste — — — — — — — — — — 11.1 0.00 11.1 1.11 0.00 38.7 Total 0.83 0.13 1.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.06 20.8 418 439 2.12 0.04 503

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Site Preparation (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 15 / 66
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.26 49.7 35.2 0.06 1.25 — 1.25 1.12 — 1.12 — 6,850 6,850 0.28 0.06 6,874 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 8.29 8.29 — 4.01 4.01 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 2.04 1.45 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 282 282 0.01 < 0.005 282 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.34 0.34 — 0.16 0.16 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.37 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 46.6 46.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 46.8 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.03 0.03 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 16 / 66
Worker 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 194 194 0.01 0.01 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.09 8.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.20 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.34 1.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.36 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.2. Site Preparation (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.26 49.7 35.2 0.06 1.25 — 1.25 1.12 — 1.12 — 6,850 6,850 0.28 0.06 6,874 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 8.29 8.29 — 4.01 4.01 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 17 / 66
————————————————Average
Daily
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 2.04 1.45 < 0.005 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 282 282 0.01 < 0.005 282 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.34 0.34 — 0.16 0.16 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.37 0.26 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 46.6 46.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 46.8 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.06 0.06 — 0.03 0.03 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.07 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 194 194 0.01 0.01 197 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.09 8.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.20 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 18 / 66
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.34 1.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.36 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.3. Grading (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 19.9 15.2 0.02 0.62 — 0.62 0.57 — 0.57 — 2,596 2,596 0.11 0.02 2,605 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 2.77 2.77 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 1.36 1.04 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 178 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.19 0.19 — 0.09 0.09 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 19 / 66
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.25 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 29.4 29.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.06 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 162 162 0.01 0.01 164 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.03 2.00 0.47 0.01 0.03 0.45 0.49 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,724 1,724 0.03 0.27 1,805 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.2 11.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 11.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.14 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 118 118 < 0.005 0.02 124 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.86 1.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.89 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.5 19.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.5

3.4. Grading (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 20 / 66
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.61 19.9 15.2 0.02 0.62 — 0.62 0.57 — 0.57 — 2,596 2,596 0.11 0.02 2,605 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 2.77 2.77 — 1.34 1.34 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 1.36 1.04 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 178 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.19 0.19 — 0.09 0.09 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.25 0.19 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 29.4 29.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 29.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — 0.03 0.03 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 21 / 66
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.06 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.04 0.04 — 162 162 0.01 0.01 164 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.03 2.00 0.47 0.01 0.03 0.45 0.49 0.03 0.13 0.16 — 1,724 1,724 0.03 0.27 1,805 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 11.2 11.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 11.4 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.14 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 118 118 < 0.005 0.02 124 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.86 1.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.89 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling < 0.005 0.03 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 19.5 19.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 20.5

3.5. Building Construction (2025) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 — 0.65 0.60 — 0.60 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,209 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 22 / 66
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.32 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 43.1 43.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 43.2 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.06 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.13 7.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.16 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.27 3.24 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.17 0.17 — 718 718 0.03 0.03 727 Vendor 0.01 0.76 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 662 662 0.01 0.10 693 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.2 14.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.4 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.6 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.36 2.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.39 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.15 2.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.25 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.6. Building Construction (2025) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 23 / 66
Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 — 0.65 0.60 — 0.60 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,209 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.32 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 43.1 43.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 43.2 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.06 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.13 7.13 < 0.005 < 0.005 7.16 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.27 3.24 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.17 0.17 — 718 718 0.03 0.03 727 Vendor 0.01 0.76 0.23 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 662 662 0.01 0.10 693 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 24 / 66
————————————————Average
Daily
Worker < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.2 14.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 14.4 Vendor < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 13.6 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.36 2.36 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.39 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.15 2.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.25 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.7. Building Construction (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 — 0.65 0.60 — 0.60 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,208 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 — 0.65 0.60 — 0.60 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,208 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 8.68 6.69 0.01 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 1,154 1,154 0.05 0.01 1,158 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 25 / 66
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 1.58 1.22 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 191 191 0.01 < 0.005 192 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.22 3.98 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.17 0.17 — 765 765 0.03 0.03 776 Vendor 0.01 0.70 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 651 651 0.01 0.10 683 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.24 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.17 0.17 — 703 703 0.01 0.03 712 Vendor 0.01 0.73 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 652 652 0.01 0.10 682 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.14 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 373 373 0.01 0.01 378 Vendor 0.01 0.38 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 342 342 0.01 0.05 358 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.03 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 61.8 61.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 62.7 Vendor < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 56.6 56.6 < 0.005 0.01 59.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.8. Building Construction (2026) - Mitigated
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 26 / 66
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 — 0.65 0.60 — 0.60 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,208 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.57 16.5 12.8 0.02 0.65 — 0.65 0.60 — 0.60 — 2,201 2,201 0.09 0.02 2,208 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.30 8.68 6.69 0.01 0.34 — 0.34 0.31 — 0.31 — 1,154 1,154 0.05 0.01 1,158 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 1.58 1.22 < 0.005 0.06 — 0.06 0.06 — 0.06 — 191 191 0.01 < 0.005 192 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.23 0.22 3.98 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.17 0.17 — 765 765 0.03 0.03 776 Vendor 0.01 0.70 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 651 651 0.01 0.10 683 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 27 / 66
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.22 0.24 3.02 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.17 0.17 — 703 703 0.01 0.03 712 Vendor 0.01 0.73 0.22 < 0.005 0.01 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 652 652 0.01 0.10 682 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.14 1.66 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.09 0.09 — 373 373 0.01 0.01 378 Vendor 0.01 0.38 0.11 < 0.005 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.03 — 342 342 0.01 0.05 358 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.03 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.02 — 61.8 61.8 < 0.005 < 0.005 62.7 Vendor < 0.005 0.07 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 56.6 56.6 < 0.005 0.01 59.3 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Paving (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 10.4 8.32 0.01 0.46 — 0.46 0.43 — 0.43 — 1,244 1,244 0.05 0.01 1,248 Paving 0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 28 / 66
————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 10.4 8.32 0.01 0.46 — 0.46 0.43 — 0.43 — 1,244 1,244 0.05 0.01 1,248 Paving 0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.43 0.34 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 51.1 51.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 51.3 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.08 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 8.46 8.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.49 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 207 207 0.01 0.01 210 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 190 190 < 0.005 0.01 193 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 29 / 66
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.92 7.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.02 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.31 1.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.10. Paving (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 10.4 8.32 0.01 0.46 — 0.46 0.43 — 0.43 — 1,244 1,244 0.05 0.01 1,248 Paving 0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.40 10.4 8.32 0.01 0.46 — 0.46 0.43 — 0.43 — 1,244 1,244 0.05 0.01 1,248 Paving 0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 30 / 66
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.43 0.34 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 51.1 51.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 51.3 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.08 0.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 8.46 8.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.49 Paving < 0.005 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.06 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 207 207 0.01 0.01 210 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.06 0.07 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 190 190 < 0.005 0.01 193 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.92 7.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 8.02 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 31 / 66
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.31 1.31 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.33 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Architectural Coating (2026) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 134 Architect
ural
Coatings

12.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 134 Architect
ural
Coatings

12.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.30 0.26 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 36.6 36.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 36.7 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 32 / 66
———————————————3.37Architect
ural
Coatings
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.06 6.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.08 Architect
ural
Coatings

0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 153 153 0.01 0.01 155 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.05 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 141 141 < 0.005 0.01 142 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 39.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.46 6.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.55 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 33 / 66
Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.12. Architectural Coating (2026) - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 134 Architect
ural
Coatings

12.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.05 1.09 0.96 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.06 — 0.06 — 134 134 0.01 < 0.005 134 Architect
ural
Coatings

12.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.30 0.26 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 36.6 36.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 36.7 Architect
ural
Coatings

3.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 34 / 66
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.06 6.06 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.08 Architect
ural
Coatings

0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.05 0.04 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 153 153 0.01 0.01 155 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.04 0.05 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.03 0.03 — 141 141 < 0.005 0.01 142 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 — 39.0 39.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 39.5 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.46 6.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 6.55 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 35 / 66

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.83 0.62 5.62 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,355 1,355 0.06 0.06 1,380 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.83 0.62 5.62 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,355 1,355 0.06 0.06 1,380 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.77 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,274 1,274 0.06 0.07 1,295 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.77 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,274 1,274 0.06 0.07 1,295 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.14 0.12 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 213 213 0.01 0.01 217 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 36 / 66
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.14 0.12 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 213 213 0.01 0.01 217

4.1.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.83 0.62 5.62 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,355 1,355 0.06 0.06 1,380 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.83 0.62 5.62 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,355 1,355 0.06 0.06 1,380 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.77 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,274 1,274 0.06 0.07 1,295 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.77 0.67 4.84 0.01 0.01 1.14 1.15 0.01 0.29 0.30 — 1,274 1,274 0.06 0.07 1,295 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.14 0.12 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 213 213 0.01 0.01 217 Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 37 / 66
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.14 0.12 0.91 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 0.05 0.05 — 213 213 0.01 0.01 217

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 885 0.05 0.01 889
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 32.5 32.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 32.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 885 0.05 0.01 889
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 32.5 32.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 32.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 38 / 66
147< 0.0050.01147147———————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.39 5.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.41
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 153

4.2.2. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 885 0.05 0.01 889
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 32.5 32.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 32.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 885 885 0.05 0.01 889
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 32.5 32.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 32.7
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 918 918 0.06 0.01 921
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 39 / 66
147< 0.0050.01147147———————————Unrefrige
rated
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 5.39 5.39 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.41
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 152 152 0.01 < 0.005 153

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 40 / 66

0.000.000.000.000.00—0.00—0.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00Unrefrige rated
Warehou
se-No
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.2.4. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 41 / 66

0.000.000.000.000.00—0.00—0.000.00—0.000.000.000.000.00Unrefrige rated
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.94 0.05 5.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.7 Total 4.11 0.05 5.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 3.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 42 / 66
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.12 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.69 Total 0.70 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.69

4.3.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.94 0.05 5.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.7 Total 4.11 0.05 5.74 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 23.6 23.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 23.7 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 43 / 66
Architect
Coatings

0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total 3.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consume
r
Products

0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings

0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landscap
e
Equipme
nt

0.12 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.69 Total 0.70 0.01 0.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.68 2.68 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.69

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 44 / 66
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 9.68 50.6 60.2 1.00 0.02 92.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 9.68 50.6 60.2 1.00 0.02 92.3

4.4.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 45 / 66
5570.146.0236430558.5——————————Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
Rail
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 58.5 305 364 6.02 0.14 557
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 9.68 50.6 60.2 1.00 0.02 92.3
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 9.68 50.6 60.2 1.00 0.02 92.3

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 46 / 66
————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 11.1 0.00 11.1 1.11 0.00 38.7
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 11.1 0.00 11.1 1.11 0.00 38.7

4.5.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 47 / 66
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 66.9 0.00 66.9 6.68 0.00 234
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — 11.1 0.00 11.1 1.11 0.00 38.7
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — 11.1 0.00 11.1 1.11 0.00 38.7

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 48 / 66
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.6.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 49 / 66
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.7.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 50 / 66
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 51 / 66
————————————————Daily,
Winter
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9.2. Mitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 52 / 66
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 53 / 66
————————————————Sequeste
red
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.4. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 54 / 66
CO2eN2OCH4CO2TNBCO2BCO2PM2.5TPM2.5DPM2.5EPM10TPM10DPM10ESO2CONOxROGVegetatio n
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.5. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land Use ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.6. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Mitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O CO2e Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 55 / 66
————————————————Daily,
Summer
(Max)
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequeste
red
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Removed — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 56 / 66

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Site Preparation Site Preparation 11/3/2025 11/21/2025 5.00 15.0 — Grading Grading 11/17/2025 12/19/2025 5.00 25.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 12/22/2025 9/25/2026 5.00 200 — Paving Paving 9/28/2026 10/16/2026 5.00 15.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/22/2026 11/6/2026 5.00 100 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 423 0.48 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 57 / 66
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 10.0 0.56
Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.2.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Site Preparation Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Site Preparation Scrapers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 423 0.48 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 84.0 0.37
Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 2 2.00 7.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 84.0 0.37
Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 2 3.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar
Mixers
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 10.0 0.56
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 58 / 66
Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 2 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Back
hoes
Diesel Tier 2 1.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 2 1.00 6.00 37.0 0.48

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 12.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 25.0 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 55.4 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 21.6 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 59 / 66
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 11.1 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.3.2. Mitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Site Preparation — — — —
Site Preparation Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 12.5 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 25.0 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Building Construction — — — —
Building Construction Worker 55.4 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 21.6 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 60 / 66
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT
Architectural Coating — — — —
Architectural Coating Worker 11.1 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor — 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44% 44%

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 198,005 66,002 1,529

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic
Y ards)
Material Exported (Cubic
Y ards)
Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (sq. ft.) Acres Paved (acres) Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 —
Grading 0.00 5,000 8.00 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 61 / 66

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 2 61% 61%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 0.58 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Y ear and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Y ear kWh per Y ear CO2 CH4 N2O
2025 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2026 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
216 216 216 78,824 1,613 1,613 1,613 588,798
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.9.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Y ear VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Y ear Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
216 216 216 78,824 1,613 1,613 1,613 588,798
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 62 / 66
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.1.2. Mitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 198,005 66,002 1,529

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.10.4. Landscape Equipment - Mitigated
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 63 / 66
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
607,538 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 22,323 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.11.2. Mitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
607,538 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Parking Lot 22,323 532 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 30,525,694 329,434
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.12.2. Mitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 30,525,694 329,434
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 64 / 66
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 124 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.13.2. Mitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 124 —
Parking Lot 0.00 —

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

5.14.2. Mitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.15.2. Mitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 65 / 66
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Y ear Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1.2. Mitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres
Public Storage Moreno Valley v3 Custom Report, 1/17/2025 66 / 66

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

5.18.2.2. Mitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use The project would include the construction of a 132,003 sq ft self-storage facility, inclusive of self-storage area, a rental office, and a lobby. The proposed project would also include 12 passenger vehicle parking spaces, 6 bicycle parking spaces, and 53 recreational vehicle (RV) parking spaces. Total project area is 3.0 acres.

The project would also include 20,777 sq ft of landscaping.

Construction: Construction Phases No demolition would be required. Construction is expected to start in November 2025 and occur for 12 months, ending in November 2026. Construction schedule was updated to reflect a 12-month schedule. Assumed overlap between building construction, paving, and architectural coating phases.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment Default equipment with Tier 2 Operations: Energy Use No natural gas, project will be all electric Construction: Dust From Material Movement project would require 5,000 CY of soil export Operations: Vehicle Data Project is anticipated to generate 216 average daily trips Trip rate = 216 ADT/ 132.006 = 1.636