February 2025
DRAFT C ULTURAL RESOURCE S ASSESSMENT
PUBLIC STORAGE MORENO VALLEY PROJECT
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
February 2025
DRAFT CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
PUBLIC STORAGE MORENO VALLEY PROJECT
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:
Ms. Cherry Miao
Public Storage
701 Western Avenue
Glendale, California 91201
Prepared by:
Riordan Goodwin, RA
LSA Associates, Inc.
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200
Riverside, California 92507
LSA Project No. 20241908
National Archaeological Data Base Information:
Type of Study: Reconnaissance Survey
Sites Recorded: None
USGS 7.5' Quadrangle: Sunnymead, California
Acreage: ~3.0
Keywords: Phase I, negative results, no monitoring recommended
i
C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25)
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
LSA was retained by Public Storage to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the proposed Public Storage Moreno Valley Project (project) located in Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. This cultural resources assessment was completed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
A cultural resources records search, additional research, and a field survey were conducted for the project area. No cultural resources were previously documented within or near the project area, no cultural resources were identified during the survey, and the project has sustained severe disturbance. Therefore, the level of sensitivity for in situ cultural resources appears low. However, due to the proximity of a Native American Traditional Cultural Property, Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training and archeological monitoring may be considered.
In the event previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be halted until the nature and significance of the find can be assessed by a qualified archaeologist.
If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to State Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials, preservation of Native American human remains and associated items in place, relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment, or any other culturally appropriate treatment.
ii
C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. ii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ....................................................................... 1 NATURAL SETTING ...................................................................................................... 1 Climate and Watershed ................................................................................................................. 1 Biology ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 3 CULTURAL SETTING ..................................................................................................... 3 Prehistory ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Ethnography .................................................................................................................................. 3 History ........................................................................................................................................... 5 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 5 Records Search .............................................................................................................................. 5 Additional Research ...................................................................................................................... 5 Field Survey ................................................................................................................................... 6 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................... 6 Records Search .............................................................................................................................. 6 Additional Research ...................................................................................................................... 6 Field Survey ................................................................................................................................... 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 8
FIGURE
Figure 1: Project Location ....................................................................................................................... 2
APPENDIX
A: RECORDS SEARCH BIBLIOGRAPHY
1 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25)
INTRODUCTION
LSA was retained by Public Storage to conduct a Cultural Resources Assessment for the proposed Public Storage Moreno Valley Project (project) located in Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. This Cultural Resources Assessment was completed per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Chapter 2.6, Section 21083.2, and California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 5, Section 15064.5. The research and field survey were conducted to determine whether the proposed project would adversely affect any resources considered historical resources per CEQA.
PERSONNEL
LSA staff that worked on this project included Senior Cultural Resources Manager/Archaeologist Riordan Goodwin, who conducted the research and authored the report; Archaeologist Chris Morgan, who conducted the survey; Dionysius Glentis, who managed the project; and Lloyd Sample, who provided Principal review.
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed project includes approximately 3 acres (Assessor’s Parcel Number [APN] 482-190-022) near the northeast corner of Alessandro Boulevard and Indian Street. This is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Sunnymead, California topographic quadrangle map in Township 3 South, Range 3 West in Section 7, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian (USGS 1968; see Figure 1).
The proposed project is a public storage development.
NATURAL SETTING
Climate and Watershed
The project region is characterized by a temperate climate, with dry, hot summers and moderate winters. Rainfall ranges from 12 to 16 inches annually (Beck and Haase 1974). Precipitation usually occurs in the form of winter rain, with warm monsoonal showers in summer. The project was once bracketed by two drainages within 1 mile, both of which drained southwest.
Biology
At an elevation of approximately 1,575 feet above mean sea level (amsl), the project is within the Lower Sonoran Life Zone of California (Schoenherr 1992), which ranges from below sea level to 3,500 feet amsl. Species such as mustard, Russian thistle, hare oats, and xeric grasses were noted on the property. Common animals of this region include rodents, rabbits, coyotes, raptors, reptiles, vultures, and insects.
3 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25) Geology
The project is located at the northern end of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province that extends from the Transverse Ranges to the tip of Baja California and includes the Los Angeles Basin (California Geological Survey 2002; Norris and Webb 1976). This region is characterized by a series of mountain ranges separated by northwest-trending valleys subparallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault. The geology of this province is similar to that of the Sierra Nevada, with numerous rock outcroppings useful to the Native Americans for resource milling, shelter, and ceremonial art.
CULTURAL SETTING
Prehistory
Chronologies of prehistoric cultural change in the Southern California area have been attempted numerous times, and several are reviewed in Moratto (2004). No single description is universally accepted because the various chronologies are based primarily on material developments identified by researchers familiar with sites in a particular region, and variation exists essentially due to the differences in those items found at the sites. Small differences occur over time and space, which combine to form patterns that are variously interpreted.
Currently, two primary regional culture chronology syntheses are commonly referenced in the archaeological literature. The first describes four cultural horizons or time periods: Horizon I – Early Man (9000–6000 BC), Horizon II – Milling Stone Assemblages (6000–3000 BC), Horizon III – Intermediate Cultures (3000 BC–AD 500), and Horizon IV – Late Prehistoric Cultures (AD 500–historic contact) (Wallace 1955). This chronology was refined using absolute chronological dates obtained after 1955 (Wallace 1978).
The second cultural chronology (Warren 1968) is based broadly on Southern California prehistoric cultures and was also revised (Warren 1984; Warren and Crabtree 1986). Warren’s (1984) chronology includes five periods in prehistory: Lake Mojave (7000–5000 BC), Pinto (5000–2000 BC), Gypsum (2000 BC–AD 500), Saratoga Springs (AD 500–1200), and Protohistoric (AD 1200–historic contact). Changes in settlement pattern and subsistence focus are viewed as cultural adaptations to a changing environment, which begins with gradual environmental warming in the late Pleistocene, continues with the desiccation of the desert lakes, followed by a brief return to pluvial conditions, and concludes with a general warming and drying trend, with periodic reversals that continue to the present (Warren and Crabtree 1986).
Ethnography
The project area is situated near the intersection of the traditional territories of the Cahuilla (Kroeber 1925; Bean 1978) and Luiseño (Kroeber 1925; Drucker 1939; Heizer and Whipple 1951; Smith and Freers 1994; Earp-Escobar 2018). Tribal territorial boundaries were somewhat fluid and changed over time. The first written accounts of the Cahuilla are attributed to the mission fathers.
Later documentation was by Barrows (1900), Hooper (1920), and Strong (1929), among others. 4 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25) Cahuilla
The territory of the Cahuilla ranged from the San Bernardino Mountains south to Borrego Springs and the Chocolate Mountains, from Orocopia Mountain to the east, to the San Jacinto Plain and Palomar Mountain to the west (Bean 1978). Cahuilla territory lies within the geographic center of Southern California and encompasses diverse environments ranging from inland river valleys and foothills to mountains and desert (Bean and Shipek 1978).
Cahuilla villages, generally located near water sources within canyons or near alluvial fans, comprised groups of related individuals, generally from a single lineage, and the territory around the village was owned by the villagers (Bean 1978). Like other Native American groups in Southern California, the Cahuilla were semi-nomadic peoples leaving their villages and utilizing temporary campsites to exploit seasonably available plant and animal resources (James 1960).
Cahuilla subsistence was based primarily on acorns, honey mesquite, screw beans, piñon nuts, and cactus fruit, supplemented by a variety of wild fruits and berries, tubers, roots, and greens (Kroeber 1925; Heizer and Elsasser 1980). Hunting deer, rabbit, antelope, bighorn sheep, reptiles, small rodents, quail, doves, ducks, and reptiles by means of bows, throwing sticks, traps, and communal drives is documented (James 1960).
Luiseño
The territory of the Luiseño “reached as far northeast as the Santa Ana River and the Box Springs Mountain Range, as far east as Mount San Jacinto, as far southeast as Lake Henshaw, and to the west including the Southern Channel Islands,” encompassing an extremely diverse environment that included beaches, lagoons, marshes, inland river valleys, foothills, and mountain groves of oaks and evergreens (Bean and Shipek 1978; Kroeber 1925; Drucker 1939; Heizer and Whipple 1951; Smith and Freers 1994; Earp-Escobar 2018).
The Luiseño lived in small communities, which were the focus of family life. Patrilineally linked, extended families occupied each village (Kroeber 1925; Bean and Shipek 1978). Luiseño villages were politically independent and were administered by a chief who inherited his position from his father. Luiseño villages generally were located in valley bottoms, along streams, or along coastal strands near mountain ranges sheltered in coves or canyons, near a water source, and in a location that was easily defended.
The Luiseño took advantage of the varied resources available. Luiseño subsistence was based primarily on seeds (e.g., acorns, grass seed, manzanita, sunflower, sage, chía, and pine nuts) that were dried and ground to be cooked into a mush. Their diet also included game animals (e.g., deer, rabbit, jackrabbit, wood rat, mice, antelope, and many types of birds) (Bean and Shipek 1978). They established seasonal camps along the coast and near bays and estuaries to gather shellfish and hunt waterfowl; and they utilized fire for crop management and engaged in communal rabbit drives (Bean and Shipek 1978).
The first written accounts of the Luiseño are attributed to the mission fathers. Later documentation was authored by Sparkman (1908), Kroeber (1925), White (1963), Oxendine (1983), and others. 5 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25) History
In California, the historic era is generally divided into three periods: the Spanish Period (1769 to 1821), the Mexican Period (1821 to 1848), and the American Period (1848 to present). Early exploration of the Riverside County area was slow until Lieutenant Pedro Fages, then the military governor of San Diego, crossed through the San Jacinto Valley in 1772.
Riverside County
The Southern Pacific Railroad completed its line from Los Angeles through the San Gorgonio Pass in 1876. The trains were eventually used to transport settlers into the area, creating a period of agricultural and land development, ultimately resulting in the establishment of Riverside County in 1893. Transportation, agriculture, and the control of water have continued to be central themes in the settlement, development, and growth of Riverside County (Robinson 1979).
Moreno Valley
Originally platted as “New Haven,” the community of Moreno Valley was renamed Moreno (Spanish for “brown”) in honor of real estate entrepreneur/founder Frank E. Brown who had helped organize the Bear Valley Land and Water Company and instituted an irrigation district that fostered large- scale grain and fruit farming (Holtzclaw et al. 2007). The community thrived during its first few years in the late 1880s, and, by 1893, it included a hotel, weekly newspaper, pharmacy, livery stable, stores, offices, two churches, and a nursery; and the surrounding farmland became known as Moreno Valley (Gunther 1984; Brown 1985). The town’s prosperity was short-lived, however, and a drought, combined with the City of Redlands’ water rights claim along the same Bear Valley Pipeline, precipitated its decline in the final years of the 19th century (Brown 1985; Holtzclaw et al. 2007).
Many settlers relocated, homes and all, to nearby Riverside (Brown 1985).
Subsequent attempts at municipal revival of the Moreno Valley area in the 20th century were unsuccessful until 1973, when locals created Lake Perris to retain water transported from the Feather River. The new lake provided recreational infrastructure in addition to a reliable water supply, and stimulated growth throughout Moreno Valley. The communities of Moreno, Sunnymead, and Edgemont were incorporated as the City of Moreno Valley in 1984 (Gunther 1984).
METHODS
Records Search
A records search was conducted by LSA Archaeologist Chris Morgan at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) on January 7, 2025. The SCIC, an affiliate of the State of California Office of Historic Preservation, is the official State repository of cultural resources records and reports for Riverside County. The records search consisted of a review of cultural resources reports completed in the Area of Potential Effects and archaeological cultural resources recorded within 1 mile of the project.
Additional Research
In October 2024, Mr. Goodwin reviewed the results of a records search for a nearby project (within 1 mile) that includes the current project area, historic period maps, and aerial photographs available 6 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25) online (Goodwin 2018). In February 2025, Mr. Goodwin reviewed the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)(Apex Companies LLC 2024)
Field Survey
On October 18, 2024, Mr. Morgan conducted the survey of the project area by walking transects spaced at 10 meters, with particular attention given to any geotechnical excavations and rodent aprons for evidence of cultural residues.
RESULTS
Records Search
Results of the records search at the SCIC indicate there have been 20 previous cultural resources studies conducted within a 1-mile radius of the current project, none of which included any portion of the project area. Although no cultural resources have been documented within the project area, two historic period resources (33-028200, a canal; and 33-28824, a minimal archaeological site) and a Native American Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) (33-029890, Pechanga Sycamore Hills TCP) are within 1 mile. The closest is the archaeological site (33-28824) approximately 0.81 mile to the northeast. There are no prehistoric archaeological resources documented within 1 mile.
Additional Research
A review of historic period maps, online research and the Phase I ESA indicated there have never been buildings or structures on the undeveloped parcel (APN 482-190-022), but it appears to have been under cultivation from at least the late 1930s into the late 1980s (Apex LLC 2024, HistoricAerials 2024).
Field Survey
Although the project area is severely disturbed by earth-moving, geotechnical testing and vegetation abatement activities and partially obscured by xeric vegetation, visibility was good at approximately 80 percent. Modern refuse was noted throughout the surface. Soils are medium to fine sandy alluvial silt. No archaeological resources were identified.
RECOMMENDATIONS
A cultural resources records search, additional research, and a field survey were conducted for the project area. No cultural resources were previously documented within or near the project area, no cultural resources were identified during the survey, and the project has sustained severe disturbance. Therefore, the level of sensitivity for in situ cultural resources appears low. However, due to the proximity of a TCP, Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) training and archeological monitoring may be considered.
In the event previously undocumented archaeological resources are identified during earthmoving activities, further work in the area should be halted until the nature and significance of the find can be assessed by a qualified archaeologist.
7 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25) If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to State Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the County Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection and make recommendations or preferences for treatment within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The MLD recommendations may include scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials, preservation of Native American human remains and associated items in place, relinquishment of Native American human remains and associated items to the descendants for treatment, or any other culturally appropriate treatment.
8 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25)
REFERENCES
Apex Companies LLC
2024 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, conducted on CA24007 Alessandro Boulevard and Indian Street Moreno Valley, California 92553. Apex Project No. PUB005-0313063-24005687
Barrows, David Prescott
1900 The Ethno-botany of the Coahilla [sic] Indians of Southern California. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bean, Lowell John
1978 Cahuilla. In California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 575–587. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, W.C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Bean, Lowell John, and Florence C. Shipek
1978 Luiseño. In California, edited by R.F. Heizer, pp. 550–563. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, W.C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Beck, Warren A., and Ynez D. Haase
1974 Historical Atlas of California. Oklahoma City: University of Oklahoma Press.
Brown, James T.
1985 Harvest of the Sun: An Illustrated History of Riverside County. Windsor Publications, Northridge, California.
California Geological Survey
2002 California Geomorphic Provinces. California Geologic Survey Note 36. California Department of Conservation.
Drucker, Phillip
1939 Culture Element Distribution, V, Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. I.
Earp-Escobar, Molly
2018 Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Cultural Resources Assessment for the PEN 18-0016 ARCO AM/PM Gas Station with Carwash Project in the City of Moreno Valley.
Goodwin, Riordan
2018 Cultural Resources Assessment Flaming Arrow Drive Storm Drain (Sunnymead Master Drainage Plan, Line M-11 Extension), City of Moreno Valley Riverside County, California.
Gunther, Jane D.
1984 Riverside County, California Place Names: Their Origins and Their Stories. Riverside:
Rubidoux Printing Company.
9 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25) Heizer, Robert F., and Albert B. Elsasser
1980 The Natural World of the California Indians. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Heizer, Robert F., and M.A. Whipple
1951 The California Indians. University of California Press, Berkeley.
HistoricAerials
2024 Various aerial photograph including the project area. Website: historicaerials.com/ (accessed October 2024).
Holtzclaw, Kenneth, and the Moreno Valley Historical Society 2007 Images of America – Moreno Valley. San Francisco: Arcadia Publishing.
Hooper, Lucile
1920 The Cahuilla Indians. University of California Publication in American Archaeology and Ethnology. Vol. 16 No. 6. Reprinted by Malki Museum Press. Banning, California.
James, Harry C.
1960 The Cahuilla Indians. Los Angeles: Westernlore Press. Reprinted in 1969 and 1985 by Malki Museum Press. Banning, California.
Kroeber, A.L.
1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Dover Publications, New York. Bulletin No. 78, Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Moratto, Michael J.
2004 California Archaeology. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press. Originally published 1984.
Norris, R.M., and R.W. Webb
1976 Geology of California, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Santa Barbara.
Oxendine, Joan
1983 The Luiseño Village During the Late Prehistoric Era. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside.
Robinson, W.W.
1979 Land in California. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Schoenherr, Allan A.
1992 A Natural History of California. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Smith, Gerald A., and Steven M. Freers
1994 Fading Images: Indian Pictographs of Western Riverside County. Riverside Museum Press, Riverside, California.
10 C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25) Sparkman, Philip S.
1908 The Culture of the Luiseño Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8(4). Berkeley.
Strong, William D.
1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26(1): 1–358. Berkeley.
United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1968 Sunnymead, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map.
Wallace, William J.
1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11(3):214–230.
1978 Post-Pleistocene Archaeology. In California, edited by R. Heizer, pp. 550–563. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8. W.C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Warren, Claude N.
1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3). Portales. 1984 The Desert Region. In California Archaeology, by M. Moratto with contributions by D.A.
Fredrickson, C. Raven, and C. N. Warren, pp. 339–430. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.
Warren, Claude N., and Robert H. Crabtree
1986 Prehistory of the Southwestern Area. In W.L. D’Azevedo ed., Handbook of the North American Indians, Vol. 11, Great Basin, pp. 183–193. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
White, Raymond C.
1963 Luiseño Social Organization. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 48 (2).
C ULTURAL R ESOURCES A SSESSMENT
F EBR UARY 202 5
P UBLIC S TORAGE M ORENO V ALLEY P ROJECT
M ORENO V ALLEY , C ALIFORNIA
P:\2024\20241908_Moreno Valley Public Storage\Technical Studies\Cultural\Report\Pub Str Mo Val Project CRA rev 2.docx (03/11/25)
APPENDIX A
RECORDS SEARCH BIBLIOGRAPHY
Report List
Report No. Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s) ResourcesOther IDs Previous Studies
RI-00182 1975 Environmental Impact Evaluation:
Archaeology of Brodiaea Avenue, Pl 984,
Water Systems Addition, Riverside County,
California
Archaeological Research
Unit, U.C. Riverside
Richard A. Weaver 33-000857NADB-R - 1080232;
Voided - MF-0169
RI-03510 1996 AN INTENSIVE SURVEY OF
APPROXIMATELY 2,500 ACRES OF
MARCH AIR FORCE BASE, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ASM AFFILIATES, INC.MCDONALD, MEG and
BARB GIACOMINI
33-005399, 33-005400, 33-005401,
33-005402, 33-005403, 33-005404,
33-005405, 33-005406, 33-005407,
33-005408, 33-005409, 33-005410,
33-005411, 33-005412, 33-005413,
33-005414, 33-005415, 33-005416,
33-005417, 33-005418, 33-005419,
33-005420, 33-005421, 33-005422,
33-005424, 33-005425, 33-005426,
33-005428, 33-005429, 33-005430,
33-005431, 33-005432, 33-005433,
33-005434, 33-005435, 33-005436,
33-005437, 33-005438, 33-005439,
33-005440, 33-005441, 33-005442,
33-005443, 33-005444, 33-005445,
33-005446, 33-005447, 33-005448,
33-005449, 33-005450, 33-005451,
33-005453, 33-005454, 33-005455,
33-005456, 33-007721, 33-007722,
33-007723, 33-007743, 33-007744,
33-007745, 33-007746, 33-007747,
33-007748, 33-007749
NADB-R - 1085079;
Voided - MF-3772
RI-03693 1991 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATION:
INLAND FEEDER PROJECT,
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
GREENWOOD &
ASSOCIATES
FOSTER, JOHN M.,
JAMES J. SCHMIDT,
CARMEN A. WEBER,
GWENDOLYN R.
ROMANI, and ROBERTA
S. GREENWOOD
33-000021, 33-000024, 33-000399,
33-000608, 33-001017, 33-001697,
33-002504, 33-002505, 33-002951,
33-003098
NADB-R - 1084465;
Voided - MF-3996
RI-03921 1995 CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY OF
PROPOSED ARCO PIPE LINE COMPANY
RECTIFIER AND BLOCK VALVE SITES,
LOCATED IN RIVERSIDE AND SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
RESEARCH UNIT, U.C.
RIVERSIDE
MOFFITT, S. A. and M.
C. HALL
NADB-R - 1084861;
Submitter - 1249;
Voided - MF-4291
RI-04992 2004 AN ARCHITECTURAL EVALUATION OF
STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 482-090-
009-0, -010-0, AND 033-0, WITHIN THE
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
MCKENNA ET AL.MCKENNA ET AL.NADB-R - 1086354;
Submitter - 10-04-10-
1001
Report List
Report No. Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s) ResourcesOther IDs Previous Studies
RI-05795 2004 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT
FOR AT&T WIRELESS FACILITY 950-031-
029A LOCATED AT 24899 ALESSANDRO
BOULEVARD, CITY OF MORENO VALLEY,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
KYLE CONSULTINGKYLE, CAROLYN E.NADB-R - 1087158
RI-08244 2009 A Phase I Cultural Resources Investigations of the Proposed Moreno Valley Unified
School District K-12 School Site at Indian
Street and Cactus Avenue, City of Moreno
Valley, Riverside County, California.
McKenna et al., Whittier,
CA.
Jeanette A. McKennaSubmitter - Job No.
09-01-1413
RI-08367 2008 A Cultural Resources Investigation and
Assessment of Potential Impacts of the
Proposed March Village Medical Campus at
the March Air Force Base in Riverside
County, California.
McKenna et al.Jeanette A. McKenna 33-017872, 33-017967, 33-017968, 33-017969, 33-017970, 33-017971,
33-017972
Submitter - Job No.
05-08-10-1363
RI-08554 2011 California Living Moreno Valley Project CRM TECHMichael Hogan, Bai "Tom" Tang, John
Goodman, and Daniel
Ballester
33-007280, 33-007284, 33-007285,
33-007289, 33-007297, 33-017202,
33-017203
Submitter - CRM
TECH Project No.
2507;
Submitter - CRM
TECH Project No.
2507
RI-08654 2011 Cultural Resources Search and Site Visit
Results for T-Mobile USA Candidate IE24173-
B
Michael Brandman
Associates
Wayne H. Bonner, Sarah
A. Williams, and
Kathleen A. Crawford
Submitter - IE24173-
B
RI-09225 2014 Historical/ Archaeological Resources
Investigation; Tentative Tract Map 33222;
City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County,
California; CRM Tech Contract No. 2842
CRM TechMichael Hogan
RI-09345 2015 Results of an Archaeological/Paleontological Monitoring Program at the Moreno Valley
Unified School District's Bayside Charter
Campus in the City of Moreno Valley,
Riverside County, California
McKenna et al.Jeanette McKenna 33-024195
RI-09617 2014 Cultural Resources Survey CLV6237 EBI ConsultingDon C. Perez RI-09718 2016 Cultural Resources Assessment of the Toby (MCE Design) project, City of moreno Valley,
Riverside County, Califonia (BCR Counsulting
Project No. TRF 1608)
BCR Consulting LLCDavid Brunzell
RI-10095 2002 Cingular Wireless Cultural Resource
Assessment
The Alaris Group, LLCColleen Dooley
Report List
Report No. Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s) ResourcesOther IDs Previous Studies
RI-10150 2016 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT
THE ALESSANDRO APARTMENTS
PROJECT CITY OF MORENO VALLEY,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
BCRCONSULTING LLCDAVID BRUNZELLOther - LAT1601
RI-10218 2015 LETTER REPORT: CULTURAL
RESOURCES SUMMARY FOR THE
PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS, INC.,
PROPERTY AT THE HOLE SITE, 4350 LA
SIERRA AVENUE, RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 92505
TETRA TECHHEATHER R PUCKETT
RI-10273 2017 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Brodiaea Commerce Center Project, City of
Moreno Valley, County of Riverside
Brian F. Smith and
Associates, Inc.
Andrew J. Garrison and
Brian F. Smith
RI-10445 2014 Cultural Resources Assessment for the
Proposed Isla Verde Residential Project, City
of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside,
California
PCR Services CorporationFatima Clark and Kyle
Garcia
RI-11328 2021 Cultural Resources Survey Report
Cottonwood Village Project Assessor's Parcel
Number 479-140-022 City of Moreno Valley,
Riverside County, California
CRM TechBai "Tom" Tang, Deirdre
Encarnacion, and Nina
Gallardo