Agenda, regular meeting — Moreno Valley City Council, October 20, 2026 (part 1 of 10)

REGULAR MEETING
AGENDA

October 20, 2026
6:00 PM
City Hall Council Chamber – 14177 Frederick Street

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS*

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
*The City Council receives a separate stipend from the Community Services District Board of Directors
Ulises Cabrera, Mayor
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz, Councilmember (District #1)
Edward A. Delgado, Councilmember (District #2)
Erlan Gonzalez, Mayor Pro Tem (District #3)
Cheylynda Barnard, Councilmember (District #4)

MEETING CALENDAR
City Council Regular Meetings
First and Third Tuesdays of the Month at 6:00 PM
City Council Closed Sessions
Scheduled As Needed Commencing at 4:00 PM or Thereafter City Council Special Recognition/Presentations
First and Third Tuesdays of the Month
Scheduled As Needed Commencing at 5:30 PM
City Council Study Sessions
Second Tuesdays of the Month
Scheduled As Needed Commencing at 6:00 PM
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. INVOCATION
Pastor David Rivera from Oasis Community Church
D. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We wish to acknowledge that we are on the unceded lands of the Cahuilla (kuh-wee-uh) and Páyomkawichum (Pah-YOM-KAH-WEE-chum) or Luiseño (lew-wee-SAY-nyoh), who as original inhabitants, and now as Sovereign Tribal Nations, have continued to live and thrive upon these lands since time immemorial.

E. ROLL CALL
F. MOTIONS TO EXCUSE ABSENCES
Recommendation(s)
Approve Excused Absences
G. STAFF INTRODUCTIONS
H. APPROVAL OF ORDER OF AGENDA
Recommendation(s)
Approve Agenda Order
I. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Speakers shall have a total of three minutes to comment on any matters not on the agenda.

Comments must pertain to matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of the City Council and/or Affiliated Boards.

J. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
Speakers have a total of three minutes to comment on all matters on the Joint Consent Calendar which are not pulled for separate discussion by the City Council and/or Affiliated Boards.

Any member of the City Council or Affiliated Boards may pull an item from the Joint Consent Calendar for discussion purposes, prior to approval of the Joint Consent Calendar.

After any requested discussion involving any given Consent item has taken place, all Consent items may be approved with one motion.
2 Recommendation(s)
Approve the Joint Consent Calendars
J.1 ORDINANCES – SECOND READING/ADOPTION - NONE
Waive the Full Reading of all Ordinances listed on the Agenda and Adopt all Ordinances by Title Only.

J.2 MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - OCTOBER 6, 2026 4:00 PM Recommendation(s)
Approve City Council and Affiliated Boards' Minutes for October 6, 2026 Closed Session Meeting.

J.3 MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - OCTOBER 6, 2026 6:00 PM Recommendation(s)
Approve City Council and Affiliated Boards’ Minutes for October 6, 2026 Regular Meeting.

J.4 MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - STUDY SESSION - OCTOBER 13, 2026 6:00 PM Recommendation(s)
Approve City Council and Affiliated Boards' Minutes for October 13, 2026 Study Session Meeting.

J.5 COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026- 2027, JULY 1, 2026 – AUGUST 31, 2026 (REPORT OF: CITY CLERK) (DISTRICT:

ALL DISTRICTS)
Council Discretionary Expenditure Reports – July & August 2026 Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 City Council Discretionary Expenditure Report for July 1, 2026, through August 31, 2026.

J.6 COUNCIL TRAINING & TRAVEL EXPENDITURE REPORTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 (REPORT OF: CITY CLERK) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS) Council Training & Travel Expenditure Reports – July & August 2026 Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 City Council Training & Travel Expenditure Report for the month of July & August 2026.

J.7 MORENO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM OF 3 UNDERSTANDING – HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER AND BUSINESS & EMPLOYMENT RESOURCE CENTER PARTNERSHIP (REPORT OF: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) (DISTRICT: NOT APPLICABLE)
Memorandum Of Understanding Between Moreno Valley Unified School District Health And Wellness Center And The City Of Moreno Valley Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Moreno Valley Unified School District Health & Wellness Center (MVUSD) and the City of Moreno Valley to establish a program partnership agreement to provide career services aimed at serving families of the school district; and

2. Authorize the City Manager or designee the authority to execute the agreement and any subsequent amendments, extensions, and all necessary documents to the agreement with the Moreno Valley Unified School District Health & Wellness Center in accordance with the agreement’s terms.

J.8 EXPAND CITYWIDE COPIER LEASE AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES (REPORT OF: FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES) (DISTRICT: NOT APPLICABLE) Expand Citywide Copier Lease and Maintenance Services
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Approve annual expenditure authority in an amount not to exceed $150,000 per fiscal year for the City's expanded citywide copier and printer fleet, including equipment leases, maintenance, and price-per-print services with VEIT, LLC, formerly known as Visual Edge IT, and GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation; and

2. Acknowledge the assignment of the equipment lease portion of the VEIT, LLC agreement to GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation and authorize lease payments via purchase order to GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation within the approved annual not-to-exceed amount; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute subsequent amendments to the Agreements with VEIT, LLC, and GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation including the authority to approve associated purchase orders in accordance with the Agreement's terms, subject to City Attorney approval and within the budgetary amounts previously approved by Council as part of the adopted and/or amended budget process.

J.9 LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES (REPORT OF: HUMAN RESOURCES) (DISTRICT: NOT APPLICABLE)
4 List of Personnel Changes (Septembert 1, 2026 – September 30, 2026) Recommendation(s)
The City Council:

1. Ratify the list of personnel changes as described.

J.10 REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

FOR UTILITY BOX ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- BROOKLYN BURGESS AT THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND IRONWOOD AVE. (REPORT OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 2)
Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Brooklyn Burgess At The Corner Of Perris Blvd. And Ironwood Ave.

Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist's design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Brooklyn Burgess for the design of a utility box wrap at the corner of Perris Blvd. and Ironwood Ave.

J.11 REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

FOR UTILITY BOX ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ZENESIA GUICE AT THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND RED MAPLE LN. (MORENO VALLEY LIBRARY IRIS PLAZA) (REPORT OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 4) Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Zenesia Guice At The Corner Of Perris Blvd.

And Red Maple Ln. (Moreno Valley Library Iris Plaza)
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist's design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Zenesia Guice for the design of a utility box wrap at the corner of Perris Blvd. and Red Maple Ln. (Moreno Valley Library Iris Plaza Branch).

J.12 REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- HEATHER ANDREWSHORTON AT THE CORNER OF SUNNYMEAD BLVD. AND HEACOCK ST. (REPORT OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 1)
Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Heather Andrews-Horton At The Corner Of 5 Sunnymead Blvd. And Heacock St.

Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Heather Andrews-Horton for the design of a utility box wrap at the corner of Sunnymead Blvd. and Heacock St.

J.13 REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

FOR UTILITY BOX ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ASHLEY JETER AT THE CORNER OF HEACOCK ST. AND HEMLOCK AVE. (THE DISTRICT) (REPORT OF:

PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 1)
Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Ashley Jeter At The Corner Of Heacock St.

And Hemlock Ave. (The District)
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Ashley Jeter for the design of a utility box wrap at the corner of Heacock St. and Hemlock Ave. (The District).

J.14 REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

FOR UTILITY BOX ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ANDREW LYKO AT THE CORNER OF EDGEMONT ST. AND EUCALYPTUS AVE. (EDGEMONT
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL) (REPORT OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 1)
Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Andrew Lyko At The Corner Of Edgemont St. and Eucalyptus Ave. (Edgemont Elementary School).

Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Andrew Lyko for the design of a utility box wrap at the corner of Edgemont St. and Eucalyptus Ave. (Edgemont Elementary School).

J.15 REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 6 FOR UTILITY BOX ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ALEXANDR SOKOLOV AT THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND OLEANDER AVE. (BEGINNING OF CITY LIMITS) (REPORT OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 4) Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Alexandr Sokolov At The Corner Of Perris Blvd. And Oleander Ave. (Beginning of City Limits).

Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Alexandr Sokolov for the design of a utility box wrap at the intersection of Perris Blvd. and Oleander Ave. (Beginning of City Limits).

J.16 REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

FOR UTILITY BOX ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- AIVAREE AGUILAR SOKOLOVA AT THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND IRIS AVE. (JUAN BAUTISTA TRAIL) (REPORT OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 4)
Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Aivaree Aguilar Sokolova At The Corner of Perris Blvd. and Iris Ave. (Juan Bautista Trail).

Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Aivaree Aguilar Sokolova for the design of a utility box wrap at the intersection of Perris Blvd. and Iris Ave. (Juan Bautista Trail).

J.17 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR THE SHERMAN AVENUE SIDEWALK

IMPROVEMENTS PER CALIFORNIA STATE PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE SECTION 22000 ET SEQ (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT 1)
Construction Agreement Award To Hardy & Harper, Inc. For The Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community Development Block Grant) Project Number 801 0119
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Find the Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community Development 7 Block Grant) project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15301(c) and Section 5.1.2 of the City’s Rules and Procedures for CEQA implementation;

2. Award a construction agreement to Hardy & Harper, Inc. for the Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community Development Block Grant) Project Number 801 0119;

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with Hardy & Harper, Inc. in the amount of $335,000.00, funded by the Community Development Block Grant Funds (Fund 2512);

4. Authorize the issuance of a purchase order to Hardy & Harper, Inc. in the amount of $402,000.00 (bid amount plus 20% contingency) once all parties have signed the agreement;

5. Authorize the City Manager, or his or her designee, to execute any subsequent change orders to the agreement with Hardy & Harper, Inc. within the adopted City Council annual budgeted amounts, including the authority to authorize the associated purchase orders in accordance with the terms of the agreement, subject to the approval of the City Attorney; and

6. Approve an Amendment to the Adopted FY 2025/26 & 2026/27 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to incorporate the proposed project changes and associated budget adjustments.

K. PUBLIC HEARING
Public testimony on each Public Hearing item shall be limited to three minutes per speaker and must pertain to the subject under consideration.

Those wishing to testify are encouraged to complete and submit a GOLDENROD speaker slip to the City Clerk Staff.

K.1 CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE (PEN26-0058) (REPORT OF: CITY ATTORNEY) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS) Circulation Element Amendment and Truck Route Ordinance (PEN26-0058) Recommendation(s)
That the City Council, as recommended by the Planning Commission:

1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2026-XX determining that Addendum 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project: 2024 Moreno Valley General Plan Update, 2024 Associated Zoning Text Amendments to Title 9 (Planning & Zoning) and Zoning Atlas Amendments, and 2024 Climate Action Plan (2024 RFEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the City Council on April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines; and 8 2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2026-XX approving an Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan pursuant to AB 98 and SB 415; and

3. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2026-XX approving a revised Truck Route Map and amending the Truck Route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

L. GENERAL BUSINESS
Public comment on each General Business item shall be limited to three minutes per speaker and must pertain to the subject under consideration.

Those wishing to speak are encouraged to complete and submit a BLUE speaker slip to the City Clerk Staff.

L.1 URGENCY ORDINANCE IMPOSING AN INITIAL 45-DAY MORATORIUM ON

APPROVAL OF LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS AND/OR AGREEMENTS FOR

CERTAIN DATA CENTERS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 (REPORT OF: CITY ATTORNEY) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS) Urgency Ordinance Imposing An Initial 45-Day Moratorium On Approval Of Land Use Entitlements and/or Agreements For Certain Data Centers Pursuant To Government Code Section 65858
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. ADOPT the proposed Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 2026-XX imposing an initial 45-day Moratorium on the approval of any land use entitlements and/or agreements to allow the operation of certain Data Centers in the City of Moreno Valley.

L.2 UTILITIES COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 2025 – AUGUST 2026 ANNUAL REPORT (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Utilities Commission September 2025 – August 2026 Annual Report Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Receive and file the September 2025 – August 2026 Annual Report for the Utilities Commission.

M. REGIONAL COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD REPORTS
M.1 March Joint Powers Commission (JPC)
M.2 Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board of Directors (RCHCA) 9 M.3 Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) M.4 Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors (RTA)
M.5 Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Committee (WRCOG) M.6 Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board of Directors (RCA) M.7 School District/City Joint Task Force
M.8 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) N. EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION REPORTS
O. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
P. CITY COUNCIL CLOSING COMMENTS
Individual Council Member comments shall be limited to five minutes.

Q. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
To add an item to a future agenda, there must be a motion, second and a majority vote of those present at the meeting. To avoid a Brown Act violation, there shall be no discussion of the merits of any such future agenda items.

R. ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION
I, Patty Rodriguez, Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City Council/City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, certify that 72 hours prior to this Regular Meeting, the City Council Agenda was posted on the City’s website at: www.moval.org and in the following three public places pursuant to City of Moreno Valley Resolution No. 2007-40:

City Hall, City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick Street
Moreno Valley Library
25480 Alessandro Boulevard
Moreno Valley Senior/Community Center
25075 Fir Avenue
Patty Rodriguez, MMC
Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City Council/City Clerk Date Posted: October 15, 2026

PUBLIC INSPECTION & DISTRIBUTION
10 The contents of the agenda packet are available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City Clerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.

Any written information related to an open session agenda item that is known by the City to have been distributed to all or a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours prior to this meeting will be made available for public inspection on the City’s website at www.moval.org and in the City Clerk’s office at 14177 Frederick Street during normal business hours.

AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT NOTICE
Upon request, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with disabilities, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and all related federal rules and regulations. Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting should direct such request to the ADA Coordinator, at 951.413.3350 at least 72 hours before the meeting. The 72-hour notification will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
11 1

CLOSED SESSION MEETING
October 6, 2026
4:00 pm

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS*

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Closed Session of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley, Housing Authority, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation, Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority, Board of Library Trustees, and the Moreno Valley Community Foundation Board of Directors was called to order at 4:05 p.m. by Mayor Cabrera in the Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street, Moreno Valley, California. *Mayor Cabrera announced that the City Council receives a separate stipend for CSD meetings
B. ROLL CALL
Ulises Cabrera - Mayor
Erlan Gonzalez - Mayor Pro Tem
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz - Councilmember
12 2
Ed Delgado - Councilmember
Cheylynda Barnard - Councilmember
C. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS ON THE AGENDA ONLY
None.

D. CLOSED SESSION
D.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - POTENTIAL INITIATION OF

LITIGATION
Pursuant Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4)
Number of Potential Cases: One
Mayor Cabrera recessed the City Council to the Training Room, second floor, City Hall, for their Closed Session at 4:06 pm.

Mayor Cabrera reconvened the City Council in the Council Chamber from their Closed Session at 5:27 pm.

E. REPORT OF ACTION FROM CLOSED SESSION, IF ANY, BY CITY

ATTORNEY
City Attorney Steven Quintanilla announced regarding D.1, "the City Council considered the matter in Closed Session and it was voted 5-0 to direct the City Attorney to file a petition with the State of California State Water Resources Control Board requesting they review the action of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, in the Santa Ana region, regarding the adoption of Order R8-2026-0034 and NPDES permit CAS618000.”
F. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Cabrera adjourned the meeting at 5:29 pm.
13 3
Submitted by:
___________________________
M. Patricia Rodriguez
Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City Council/City Clerk Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Secretary, City as Successor Agency for the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Secretary, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Secretary, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation
Secretary, Board of Library Trustees
Secretary, Public Financing Authority
Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Foundation
Approved by:
___________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor, City of Moreno Valley
President, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Chairperson, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation Chairperson, Board of Library Trustees
Chairperson, Public Financing Authority
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Community Foundation
14 1

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 6, 2026
6:00 pm

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS*

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS (5:30pm)

1. RECOGNITION: FOURTH OF JULY PARADE & ART CONTEST
Mayor Cabrera presented the Recognitions to the Fourth of July Parade and Art Contest winners. The Parade winners were as follows: American Legion Post 574, Liberty 12 Float, Interact Club, Gran Prix BMX, Moreno Valley Elks Lodge, L+A Bins, and the Moreno Valley Rotary Club. The Art Contest winners were as follows: First Place, Harlee Rider, Second Place, Marcia Gracia, and Third Place, Isabelle Zeledon.

2. PROCLAMATION: RECOGNIZING FIRE PREVENTION WEEK
Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez presented the Proclamation to Fire Marshal Edgar Gonzalez recognizing Fire Prevention week.

3. COMMENDATION: RECOGNIZING DEPUTY ANTHONY SANCHEZ FOR A

LIFE-SAVING RESCUE FROM A BURNING VEHICLE
Councilmember Delgado presented the Commendation to Deputy Anthony Sanchez for a life-saving rescue from a burning vehicle. 15 2
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Joint Meeting of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley Housing Authority, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation, Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority, the Board of Library Trustees, and the Moreno Valley Community Foundation Board of Directors was called to order at 6:00pm by Mayor Cabrera in the Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street.

Mayor Cabrera announced that the City Council receives a separate stipend for CSD meetings.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez.

C. INVOCATION
The invocation was provided by Miss Blayne Tamrat from the Local Spiritual Assembly of the Bahais of Moreno Valley.

D. LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Mayor Cabrera provided the Land Acknowledgment statement.

E. ROLL CALL

Present:

Cheylynda Barnard - Councilmember
Ed Delgado - Councilmember
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz - Councilmember
Erlan Gonzalez - Mayor Pro Tem
Ulises Cabrera - Mayo
F. MOTIONS TO EXCUSE ABSENCES
None.

G. STAFF INTRODUCTIONS
Patty Rodriguez - City Clerk
Paul Bradvica - Management Analyst
Sonia Gomez – Senior Deputy City Clerk
16 3
Steven Quintanilla- City Attorney
Brian Mohan - City Manager
Launa Jimenez – Assistant City Manager
Felicia London– Chief Financial Officer
Sean Kelleher - Assistant City Manager
Angelica Frausto-Lupo – Community Development Director
Kyle Warsinski - Economic Development Director
Melissa Walker – Public Works Director
Claudia Torres - Parks and Community Services Division Manager Natalie Potter - Human Resources Director
Jesse Park - Fire Chief
Sarah Mack – Chief of Police
H. APPROVAL OF ORDER OF AGENDA
Moved by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
Seconded by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Approve Agenda Order
Ayes (5): Mayor Cabrera, Councilmember Barnard District 4, Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1, Councilmember Delgado District 2, and Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez District 3
RESULT: Approved (5 to 0)
I. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Brandon Carn (Zoom)

1. Art program.

Christopher Baca

1. Election season.

2. City staff compensation.

Wanda Scruggs
17 4

1. Thanked City Council for their donation.

2. Donation update for "I Can Soar" non-profit.

Scott Heveran

1. Highlighted city services.

2. Ethics committee.

Fred Banuelos

1. Election season.

2. Parking issues.

Lindsay Robinson

1. Land purchase.

2. City ethics.

Ismael Gonzalez (Zoom)

1. Warehouse moratorium.

Nikita Wilson

1. Code enforcement issues/updates.

Louise Palomarez

1. Critical of Mayor Cabrera.

Joann Martinez Stephan

1. Thanked Wanda Scruggs.

2. Thanked Nikita Wilson for "Meet and Mingle" with candidates.

Roy Bleckert

1. Ethics committee.

2. Brown Act violation.

3. Critical of Mayor Cabrera.

Bob Palomarez

1. Thanked first responders.

J. JOINT CONSENT CALENDARS
18 5
Mayor Cabrera asked the City Council if there were any items they would like removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action or discussion.

With no items being removed, Mayor Cabrera called for Council questions of staff.

With no Council questions of staff, Mayor Cabrera called for public comments to be heard.

Seth Cox (J.21)

1. Clarification on item.

Chris Baca (J.8)

1. Payment register, transparency concerns.

Louise Palomarez (J.21)

1. Concerns with transparency.

With the conclusion of public comments, City Manager Brian Mohan provided clarification on comments regarding J.21 and J.8.

Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez asked questions of staff.

City Manager Brian Mohan responded to Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez's inquiry.

Councilmember Delgado and Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz asked staff questions.

City Manager Brian Mohan responded to Council's inquiries.

Mayor Cabrera commented on J.15, J.16, J.20, J.22, and J.23.

Councilmember Barnard asked for clarification on Cal Cards.

City Manager Brian Mohan responded to Councilmember Barnard's inquiry.

Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz provided additional comments on the item.

With no further comments, Mayor Cabrera entertained a motion.

Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
Approve the Joint Consent Calendars
19 6
Ayes (5): Mayor Cabrera, Councilmember Barnard District 4, Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1, Councilmember Delgado District 2, and Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez District 3
RESULT: Approved (5 to 0)
J.1 ORDINANCES – SECOND READING/ADOPTION
J.1.1 Municipal Code Amendment (PEN26-0090) Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance Revising Title 8 (Building and Construction) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code
J.2 MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - CLOSED SESSION - SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 4:00 PM
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
Approve City Council and Affiliated Boards' Minutes for September 1, 2026 Closed Session Meeting.

RESULT: Approved
J.3 MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING - SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 6:00 PM
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
Approve City Council and Affiliated Boards’ Minutes for September 1, 2026 Regular Meeting.

RESULT: Approved
J.4 MINUTES - CITY COUNCIL - STUDY SESSION - SEPTEMBER 8, 2026 6:00 PM
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
Approve City Council and Affiliated Boards' Minutes for September 8, 2026, Study Session Meeting.

RESULT: Approved
20 7
J.5 MASTER ATTENDANCE LOG FOR CITY COUNCIL ADVISORY
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS – AUGUST 2026 (REPORT OF: CITY
CLERK) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Receive and File.

RESULT: Approved
J.6 CITY COUNCIL LIAISON ATTENDANCE REPORT – AUGUST 2026 (REPORT OF: CITY CLERK) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Receive and File
RESULT: Approved
J.7 PROPOSED 2027/2028 LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY PLATFORM
(REPORT OF: CITY MANAGER) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Approve the proposed 2027/2028 Legislative Advocacy Platform; and

2. Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to implement the Legislative Platform and take advocacy actions consistent with the policy direction established by the City Council.

RESULT: Approved
J.8 PAYMENT REGISTER - AUGUST 2026 (REPORT OF FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Receive and file Payment Register
21 8
RESULT: Approved
J.9 ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS INTO CFD NO. 2021-01 (PARKS MAINTENANCE) (REPORT OF: FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT
SERVICES) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the Community Services District:

1. Adopt Resolution No. CSD 2026-27, a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Moreno Valley Community Services District, ordering the annexation of territory to Moreno Valley Community Services District Community Facilities No. 2021-01 (Parks Maintenance) and approving the amended maps for said District, for the specific properties as listed in the Discussion section of this staff report and as previously approved by the Landowner and certified by the City’s Election Official (Amendment Nos. 261, 347, 352, 354, 355, 363, 364, 366, and 367).

RESULT: Approved
J.10 ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS INTO CFD NO. 2014-01 (MAINTENANCE SERVICES) AND CFD NO. 2023-01 (PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES) (REPORT OF: FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES) (DISTRICT: ALL APPLICABLE)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2014- 01 (Maintenance Services), adopt Resolution No. 2026-57, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities District No. 2014-01 (Maintenance Services) and approving the amended map for said District, for the specific property as listed in the Discussion section of this staff report and as previously approved by the Landowner and certified by the City’s Election Official (Amendment No. 99); and

2. Acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 2023- 01 (Public Safety Services), adopt Resolution No. 2026-58, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, ordering the annexation of territory to the City of Moreno Valley Community Facilities 22 9
District, for the specific properties as listed in the Discussion section of this staff report and as previously approved by the Landowner and certified by the City’s Election Official (Amendments Nos. 75, 174, 179, 180, 181, 189, 190, 192, and 193).

RESULT: Approved
J.11 FY 2025/26 SB 1205 STATE MANDATED INSPECTIONS (REPORT OF:

FIRE) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Approve Resolution No. 2026-59, acknowledging the receive and file report regarding the State Mandated annual inspections of certain occupancies pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Sections §13145, §13146, and §17921.

RESULT: Approved
J.12 LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES (REPORT OF: HUMAN RESOURCES) (DISTRICT: NOT APPLICABLE)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
The City Council:

1. Ratify the list of personnel changes as described.

RESULT: Approved
J.13 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PCS SITE (TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEASE) AGREEMENT- TOWNGATE PARK (REPORT OF: PARKS &
COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 1)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the Community Services District:

1. Approve the First Amendment to the Parks and Community Services (PCS) Site Agreement ("Agreement") with Lessee STC ONE, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, for continuation of their right to lease a portion of Towngate Park property from the City of Moreno Valley Community Services District for the purpose of retaining and maintaining 23 10
their Telecommunications Cell Tower and related equipment at this property site. This First Amendment to the Agreement includes revision of certain terms of the Agreement as outlined in the First Amendment; and

2. Authorize the City Manager/Executive Director of the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD) on behalf of the City/CSD to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement with Lessee, STC ONE, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, to extend the renewal terms of the Agreement for an additional six (6) five-year (5-year) terms ("Renewal Terms") through October 22, 2056, along with additional modifications to the Agreement as more specifically outlined in the First Amendment.

RESULT: Approved
J.14 APPROVAL OF THE PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES 2027 SPECIAL EVENTS CALENDAR (REPORT OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Approve the Parks & Community Services 2027 Special Event Calendar as presented.

RESULT: Approved
J.15 NAMING OF THE NEW PARK WITHIN SUNSET CROSSINGS
DEVELOPMENT (TRACT 38443) AS “COTTONWOOD PARK” (REPORT
OF: PARKS & COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 3)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Approve the naming of the new 2.4-acre park located within the Sunset Crossings development (Tract 38443), adjacent to Cottonwood Avenue, as “Cottonwood Park.”
RESULT: Approved
J.16 TEMPORARY ROAD CLOSURES FOR THE ST. CHRISTOPHER
PARISH SPECIAL EVENT (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT 3)
24 11
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Approve the recommended temporary road closures for the St.

Christopher Parish “Visit of the Pilgrimage of Our Lady of San Juan de Los Lagos” special event procession on Cottonwood Avenue between Perris Boulevard and Kitching Street; and

2. Authorize the Moreno Valley Police Department and the Public Works Director/City Engineer to implement additional changes or recommend road closures as necessary for the event.

RESULT: Approved
J.17 PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR 115 KILOVOLT CIRCUIT BREAKERS (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Authorize the award of a purchase agreement to Walters Wholesale Electric, Inc. for the purchase of 115 kV circuit breakers;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with Walters Wholesale Electric, Inc. in the amount of $682,639.10 ($593,599.22 bid amount plus a 15% contingency), subject to approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorize the issuance of a Purchase Order to Walters Wholesale Electric, Inc. in the amount of $682,639.10, funded by the Moreno Valley Electric Utility’s Restricted Asset Fund balance (Fund 6011), once the agreement has been signed by all parties; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent Amendments to the Agreement with Walters Wholesale Electric, Inc. within the adopted City Council annual budgeted amounts, including the authority to authorize the associated purchase orders in accordance with the terms of the agreement, subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

RESULT: Approved
J.18 AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTINGENCY TO THE

CORNERSTONECC CONTRACT TO INSTALL ELECTRIC VEHICLE
25 12

CHARGERS AT THE MORENO VALLEY CIVIC CENTER
AMPHITHEATER (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT 1)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to increase the CornerstoneCC contract contingency amount for Project 805 0081 by $29,841.20 to a total amount of $179,047.20 (original authorized contract amount of $149,206 plus 20% contingency). Funded by the Moreno Valley Electric Utility’s Restricted Assets Fund (6011);

2. Authorize a change order to the purchase order amount for CornerstoneCC for Project Number 805 0081 to the total amount of $179,047.20, once the construction change order has been executed by all parties; and

3. Authorize the City Manager or his designee to execute any subsequent construction change orders to the Contract with CornerstoneCC that are necessary to complete the project, including issuing additional purchase orders, up to the annual project budget as previously approved by the City Council, subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

RESULT: Approved
J.19 AUTHORIZATION OF ADDITIONAL CONTINGENCY TO THE

CORNERSTONECC CONTRACT TO INSTALL ELECTRIC VEHICLE
CHARGERS AT THE CITY HALL FLEET CAGE (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT 1)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Authorize the City Manager to increase the CornerstoneCC contract contingency amount for Project 805 0083 by $139,683 to a total amount of $838,098 (original authorized contract amount of $698,415 plus 20% contingency). Funded by the Moreno Valley Electric Utility’s Restricted Assets Fund (6011);

2. Authorize a change order to the purchase order amount for CornerstoneCC for Project Number 805 0083 to the total amount of 26 13
$838,098, once the construction change order has been executed by all parties; and

RESULT: Approved
J.20 AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR

THE BAY AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS (COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT) (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS)
(DISTRICT 1)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Find the Bay Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community Development Block Grant) project exempt from the Section 15301(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and Section

5.1.2 of the City's Rules and Procedures for CEQA implementation;

2. Award a construction agreement to L.C. Paving & Sealing Inc. for the Bay Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community Development Block Grant);

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with L.C. Paving & Sealing Inc. in the amount of $1,179,907.75, funded by the Community Development Block Grant (Fund 2512) funds;

4. Authorize the issuance of a purchase order to L.C. Paving & Sealing Inc. in the amount of $1,415,889.30 (bid amount plus 20% contingency) once all parties have signed the agreement;

5. Authorize the City Manager, or his or her designee, to execute any subsequent change orders to the agreement with L.C. Paving & Sealing Inc. up to the purchase order amount necessary to complete the project, subject to the approval of the City Attorney; and

6. Approve an Amendment to the Adopted FY 2025/26 & 2026/27 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to incorporate the proposed project changes and associated budget adjustments; and
27 14

7. Authorize budget adjustment as set forth in the fiscal impact section of this report.

RESULT: Approved
J.21 PURCHASE OF POWER DISTRIBUTION CENTER WITH SWITCHGEAR (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Authorize the award of a purchase agreement to Siemens Industry, Inc. for the purchase of a PDC with switchgear;

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with Siemens Industry, Inc. in the amount of $4,564,780.72 ($4,149,800.65 bid amount plus a 10% contingency), subject to approval by the City Attorney;

3. Authorize the issuance of a Purchase Order to Siemens Industry, Inc. in the amount of $4,564,780.72, funded by the Moreno Valley Utility’s (MVU) Restricted Asset Fund balance (Fund 6011), once the agreement has been signed by all parties; and

4. Authorize the City Manager to execute any subsequent Amendments to the Agreement with Siemens Industry, Inc. within the adopted City Council annual budgeted amounts, including the authority to authorize the associated purchase orders in accordance with the terms of the agreement, subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

RESULT: Approved
J.22 ROAD CLOSURES FOR THE 2026 ANNUAL TRUNK-OR-TREAT EVENT (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT 1)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Approve all recommended road closures for the 2026 Annual Trunk-orTreat event as outlined in this staff report; and

2. Authorize the Moreno Valley Police Department and the Public Works Director/City Engineer to implement additional traffic control measures or recommend road closures as necessary for the event.
28 15
RESULT: Approved
J.23 ROAD CLOSURES FOR THE 2026 ANNUAL FUN COLOR RUN
(REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT 1)
Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Approve all recommended road closures for the 2026 Annual Fun Color Run as outlined in this report; and

2. Authorize the Moreno Valley Police Department and the Public Works Director/City Engineer to make additional changes or road closure recommendations as needed for the event.

RESULT: Approved
J.24 AUTHORIZATION TO AWARD A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR

CITYWIDE TRASH FULL CAPTURE DEVICE INSTALLATION PROJECT FOR PER CALIFORNIA STATE PUBLIC AGREEMENT CODE 22000 ET SEQ. (REPORT OF: PUBLIC WORKS) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS) Moved by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council:

1. Find the Citywide Trash Full Capture Device Installation project exempt from Section 15301(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Section 5.1.2 of the City's Rules and Procedures for CEQA implementation;

2. Award a Construction Agreement to G2 Construction, Inc. for the Citywide Trash Full Capture Device Installation Project;

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the Construction Agreement with G2 Construction, Inc. in the amount of $418,500, funded by the Storm Water Management Fund (Fund 2008) and Capital Improvement Grants Fund (Fund 3001), subject to the approval of the City Attorney;

4. Authorize the issuance of a purchase order to G2 Construction, Inc. in the amount of $502,200 (bid amount plus 20% contingency), once all parties have executed the Agreement; and
29 16

5. Authorize the City Manager or his or her designee to execute any subsequent change orders to the Agreement with G2 Construction, Inc., up to the purchase order amount as necessary to complete the project, subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

RESULT: Approved
K. PUBLIC HEARING
K.1 PUBLIC HEARING AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF THE MORENO

VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEASE REVENUE BONDS,
SERIES 2026A (REPORT OF: CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
Chief Financial Officer Felicia London introduced Jim Fabian, City's Municipal Advisor from Feldman, Rolapp and Associates, Nick Yeager, City's Bound Counsel from Stradling Law, and Tom Jacob the underwriter for Stifel, Nicolaus and Company.

Jim Fabian, Nick Yeager, and Tom Jacob provided the presentation.

With the conclusion of the presentation, Mayor Cabrera asked questions regarding the presentation.

Jim Fabian and Tom Jacob responded to Mayor Cabrera's inquiries.

With no further Council questions of staff, Mayor Cabrera called for the presentation to be heard from Fire Chief Jesse Park and Police Chief Sarah Mack.

Fire Chief Jesse Park and Police Chief Sarah Mack provided the presentation.

Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez asked questions of staff.

Chief Jesse Park responded to Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez's inquiries.

Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz left at 7:39pm.

Councilmember Delgado asked questions of staff.

Fire Chief Jesse Park responded to Councilmember Delgado's inquiries.

Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez asked additional questions of staff.

Police Chief Sarah Mack responded to Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez's inquiries.

City Manager Brian Mohan provided comments on the item. 30 17
With no further Council questions, Mayor Cabrera called for public comments to be heard.

Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz returned at 7:43pm.

Seth Cox

1. Supported.

Christopher Baca

1. Supported.

Mayor Cabrera left the dais at 7:52pm.

Roy Bleckert

1. Critical of Mayor Cabrera.

2. Concerns.

Louise Palomarez

1. Supported, concerned with cost.

2. Critical of Mayor Cabrera.

3. Election season.

Manuel Topete

1. Concerns with Bond.

2. Fire Department concerns.

3. Police concerns.

Joann Martinez Stephan

1. Supported.

Mayor Cabrera returned to the dais at 8:04pm.

Councilmember Delgado provided comments on the item.

With the conclusion of public comments, Mayor Cabrera called for Council comments and deliberation.

Councilmember Delgado, Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz, and Councilmember Barnard provided comments on the item.

Councilmember Delgado left the dais at 8:11pm.
31 18
Councilmember Delgado returned to the dais at 8:13pm.

Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez and Mayor Cabrera provided comments on the item.

With no additional Council comments or deliberation, Mayor Cabrera entertained a motion.

Moved by: Mayor Cabrera
Seconded by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
That the City Council and the Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority:

1. Find that the 2026 Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines; and

2. Conduct the Public Hearing and accept public testimony regarding the issuance of Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2026A, in an aggregate principal amount Not to Exceed $150,000,000; and

3. Adopt Resolution Number 2026-60, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley approving the issuance by the Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority of Not to Exceed $150,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2026A to finance certain capital improvements of the City; approving the form of an Official Statement; and authorizing the execution and delivery of necessary documents and the taking of all necessary actions relating to the financing; and

4. Adopt Resolution Number PFA 2026-02, A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority authorizing the issuance and sale of Not to Exceed $150,000,000 Aggregate Principal Amount of Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2026A to finance certain capital improvements; of the City of Moreno Valley; approving the form of an Official Statement; and authorizing the execution and delivery of necessary documents and the taking of all necessary actions relating to the financing; and

5. Approve the necessary budget adjustments to allow the recording of the issuance of the bonds and related debt service required for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026/27; and
32 19

6. Authorize the necessary additions and budget adjustments to the FY 2026/27 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and appropriate $134,360,000 for the new projects; and

7. Authorize the City Manager to execute amendments to all related agreements for the Public Safety Revenue Bonds, Series 2026A, and any associated consultant agreements within the City Council-approved annual budgeted amounts, including the authority to authorize the associated purchase orders in accordance with the terms of the related agreement(s), subject to the approval of the City Attorney.

Ayes (5): Mayor Cabrera, Councilmember Barnard District 4, Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1, Councilmember Delgado District 2, and Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez District 3
RESULT: Approved (5 to 0)
L. GENERAL BUSINESS - NONE
M. REGIONAL COMMISSION/COMMITTEE/BOARD REPORTS
M.1 March Joint Powers Commission (JPC)
None.

M.2 Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency Board of Directors (RCHCA)
Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez reported the following:

At the meeting of the RCHCA Board of Directors on September 10, 2026, the Board received the following Reports: Board of Directors Meeting Schedule for 2027; Mitigation Fee Transfers from Member Agencies; Financial Report through June 2026; Fiscal Year 2025/2026 4th Quarter Budget Amendment; Contracts and Grants Status Update; Reserve Management Coordinating Committee; Reserve Management Committee for the Southwestern Riverside County Multi-Species Reserve and the Lake Mathews Reserve; Attendance Roster; Amendment to the Appendix of the RCHCA Conflict of Interest Code; Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Habitat Conservation Plan Renewal; Member Agency Adoption of Updated SKR Mitigation Fee Schedule; and, Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Reserve Management and Monitoring Activities Update.

Additionally, staff recommendations were approved for the following:
33 20
 Approve the schedule of RCHCA Board of Directors meetings for 2027.
 Approve the 4th Quarter Budge Amendment for Fiscal Year 2025/2026.
 Adopt Resolution Number 2026-03; A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency amending the Conflict of Interest Code pursuant to the Political Reform Act of 1974.

M.3 Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)
Mayor Cabrera reported the following:

For the Commission meeting, the Commission approved funding to continue Metrolink service through the end of the year while regional agencies work toward a full-year budget.

The Commission also received updates on several I-15 corridor improvements intended to improve traffic flow and approved the name San Jacinto Valley Expressway for the future roadway formerly known as the State Route 79 Realignment Project.

Lastly, the commission agreed to conduct additional traffic analysis, as requested by the City of Perris, to evaluate potential local traffic impacts associated with the phased opening of the expressway.

For the Budget and Implementation meeting, the Committee approved approximately $3.12 million in transit funding for Riverside County, supporting discounted and free fares, student programs, and clean-transit infrastructure. Combined with prior funding, the County will receive approximately $7.99 million this fiscal year.

The Committee also reviewed public input on regional transit needs, with residents primarily requesting more service, increased frequency, improved bus stops, affordable fares, and better accessibility. The comments were forwarded to transit operators for consideration in future service improvements.

M.4 Riverside Transit Agency Board of Directors (RTA)
None.

M.5 Western Riverside Council of Governments Executive Committee (WRCOG)
34 21
None.

M.6 Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Board of Directors (RCA)
Mayor Cabrera reported the following:

At the RCA Board of Directors meeting on August 3, 2026, reports for the following were received:
 Western Riverside County MSHCP Fee Collection for April 2026;  Western Riverside County MSHCP Fee Collection for May 2026;  Joint Project Review Status;
 Acquisition Status;
 Monthly Investment for April 2026;
 Monthly Investment for May 2026;
 Single Signature Authority Report; and
 State and Federal Legislative Update
Staff provided a presentation on the Reserve of the Month – Bishop Reserve Land, over 40-acres acquired, part of a larger 272-acre contiguous conservation assemblage, located adjacent to the Cleveland National Forest, western part of the City of Lake Elsinore.

Board of Directors Executive Director Report, Aaron Hake, reported that they have closed on 4 properties 394.8 acres since the last meeting in June, 19.2 million dollars in investment, much of this was from a State Grant.

Finally, Closed Session Item No.1 approved the purchase of the Baker property for $161,500 and Item No.2 approved the purchase of the Lim property for $205,000
M.7 School District/City Joint Task Force
None.

M.8 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) None.

N. EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATION REPORTS
35 22
None.

O. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT

1. Helen Putnam award.

2. Government Finance Officer Association awards.

3. Community Day of Service, Saturday, October 10th.

4. Free Dump Day, Saturday, October 10th.

P. CITY COUNCIL CLOSING COMMENTS
Councilmember Barnard

1. Parks and Community Services updates.

2. Asked to close meeting in honor of Breast Cancer Awareness month and friend Christine Cunningham.

3. Medical research.

Councilmember Delgado

1. Breast Cancer Awareness month.

2. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce meetings.

3. Hidden Springs community meeting.

4. Sketchers ribbon cutting.

5. League of California Cities meeting recap.

Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz

1. Five year anniversary of her Mother passing, former City Councilmember Victoria Baca.

2. Recounted stories of Mother.

3. Asked to close the meeting in honor of her Mother, former City Councilmember Victoria Baca.

Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez

1. Northgate Market approval.

2. El Grito event.

3. Wake Up Moval event.
36 23

4. Moreno Valley Museum.

Mayor Cabrera

1. Breast Cancer Awareness month.

2. Moreno Valley Mall and Art Space.

3. Thanked former City Manager Mike Lee.

4. Mexican Mobile Consulate.

5. El Grito event.

6. Community events.

7. League of California Cities.

Q. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Louise Palomarez

1. Asked for City Council candidates to attend City Council meetings.

Moved by: Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1
Seconded by: Councilmember Delgado District 2
Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz moved to name the amphitheater in honor of the late Victoria Baca.

Ayes (3): Councilmember Barnard District 4, Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz District 1, and Councilmember Delgado District 2
Nayes (2): Mayor Cabrera, and Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez District 3 RESULT: Approved (3 to 2)
R. ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Cabrera adjourned at 8:58pm in memory of Victoria Baca and Mayor Cabrera's Grandmother.
37 24
Submitted by:
____________________________
M. Patricia Rodriguez
Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City Council/City Clerk Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Secretary, City as Successor Agency for the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Secretary, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Secretary, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation
Secretary, Board of Library Trustees
Secretary, Public Financing Authority
Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Foundation
Approved by:
_____________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor, City of Moreno Valley
President, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Chairperson, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation Chairperson, Board of Library Trustees
Chairperson, Public Financing Authority
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Community Foundation
38 1

STUDY SESSION MEETING
October 13, 2026
6:00 pm

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY
MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS*

CITY AS SUCCESSOR AGENCY FOR THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT

AGENCY OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

MORENO VALLEY HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS

MORENO VALLEY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY

BOARD OF LIBRARY TRUSTEES

MORENO VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A. CALL TO ORDER
The Joint Study Session of the City Council, Community Services District, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley, Moreno Valley Housing Authority, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation, Moreno Valley Public Financing Authority, the Board of Library Trustees, and the Moreno Valley Community Foundation Board of Directors was called to order at 6:01 pm by Mayor Cabrera in the Council Chamber located at 14177 Frederick Street.

Mayor Cabrera announced that the City Council receives a separate stipend for CSD meetings.

B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez.

C. ROLL CALL

Present:
39 2
Cheylynda Barnard – Councilmember
Elena Baca-Santa Cruz - Councilmember
Erlan Gonzalez – Mayor Pro Tem
Ulises Cabrera – Mayor

Absent:

Ed Delgado - Councilmember
D. INTRODUCTIONS
Patty Rodriguez – Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City Council/City Clerk Paul Bradvica - Management Analyst
Sonia Gomez – Senior Deputy City Clerk
Steven Quintanilla- City Attorney
Brian Mohan - City Manager
Launa Jimenez- Assistant City Manager/Administration
Patty Yhuit- Deputy Director Financial Operations
Sean Kelleher – Assistant City Manager/Development Services Angelica Frausto-Lupo – Community Development Director
Natalie Potter - Human Resources Director
Nicki Hendricks- Community Services Division Manager
Melissa Walker - Public Works Director
Kyle Warsinski – Economic Development Director
Sarah Mack - Chief of Police
E. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON MATTERS ON THE AGENDA ONLY
F. BUSINESS
F.1 INDUSTRIAL LAND USE AND ZONING (REPORT OF: COMMUNITY

AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
Community Development Director Angelica Frausto-Lupo introduced Planning Official Sergio Madera, who will be providing the presentation. 40 3
Planning Official Sergio Madera and Economic Development Manager Melissa McClain provided the presentation.

With the conclusion of the presentation, Mayor Cabrera called for Council questions of staff.

With no further Council questions of staff, Mayor Cabrera called for public comments to be heard.

Simon Berrera

1. Cost of industrial growth.

2. Vacant building usage.

Ismael Gonzalez

1. Warehouse concerns.

Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz left the dais at 6:16pm.

Christopher Baca

1. Highland Fairview concerns.

Councilmember Baca-Santa Cruz returned to the dais at 6:19pm.

Tatiana Flores

1. Revisit Moratorium plan.

2. Utilize vacant warehouse space for truck parking.

Seth Cox

1. Zoning concerns.

Lindsay Robinson

1. History Museum.

JoAnn Stephan

1. Utilize space for children’s activities.

With the conclusion of public comments, Mayor Cabrera called for Council discussion.

Councilmember Barnard asked staff questions.

City Manager Brian Mohan provided clarification on the item.

Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez asked questions of staff. 41 4
City Manager Brian Mohan responded to Council’s inquiries.

Councilmember Barnard asked additional questions of staff.

City Manager Brian Mohan and Assistant City Manager Sean Kelleher responded to Councilmember Barnard’s inquiry.

Mayor Cabrera asked additional questions of staff.

Assistant City Manager Sean Kelleher responded to Mayor Cabrera’s inquiry.

With no further Council questions or comments, Mayor Cabrera and the City Council concluded this item.

F.2 MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 9.02.020 PERMITTED USE TABLE AND ZONING (REPORT OF: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT)
Economic Development Director Kyle Warsinski introduced the staff report and presentation.

Planning Official Sergio Madera and Economic Development Manager Melissa McClain provided the presentation.

With the conclusion of the presentation, Mayor Cabrera called for Council questions of staff.

With no Council questions of staff, Mayor Cabrera called for public comments to be heard.

Ismael Gonzalez

1. Warehouse concerns.

Christopher Baca

1. Concerns.

Simon Berrera

1. Transparency, development interest, and long-term direction for City.

Tatiana Flores

1. Create access for alternate modes of transportation.

David Zeitz

1. Concerns.
42 5
Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez left the dais at 7:36pm.

Louis Palomarez

1. Concerns with development.

Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez returned to the dais at 7:39pm.

JoAnn Stephan

1. Concerns.

Nathan Urena

1. Historical zoning.

Roy Bleckert

1. Community concerns.

With the conclusion of public comments, Mayor Cabrera called for Council discussion.

Mayor Cabrera asked staff questions.

Economic Development Director Kyle Warsinski responded to Mayor Cabrera’s inquiries.

Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez asked staff questions.

City Manager Brian Mohan responded to Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez’s inquiry.

Councilmember Barnard and Mayor Cabrera provided comments on the item.

With no further Council comments, Mayor Cabrera moved to adjourn the meeting.

G. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the City Council, Mayor Cabrera adjourned the meeting at 8:06 pm.
43 6
Submitted by:
____________________________
M. Patricia Rodriguez
Manager of the Office of the Mayor and City Council/City Clerk Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Secretary, City as Successor Agency for the Community
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Secretary, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Secretary, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation
Secretary, Board of Library Trustees
Secretary, Public Financing Authority
Secretary, Moreno Valley Community Foundation
Approved by:
_____________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor, City of Moreno Valley
President, Moreno Valley Community Services District
Chairperson, City as Successor Agency for the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Moreno Valley
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Housing Authority
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Public Financing Corporation Chairperson, Board of Library Trustees
Chairperson, Public Financing Authority
Chairperson, Moreno Valley Community Foundation
44 Report to City Council
ID: 26-0396 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patty Rodriguez, MMC, Manager of the Office of
Mayor and City Council/City Clerk
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: COUNCIL DISCRETIONARY EXPENDITURE REPORTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027, JULY 1, 2026 – AUGUST
31, 2026 (REPORT OF: CITY CLERK) (DISTRICT: ALL

DISTRICTS)
TITLE SUMMARY: Council Discretionary Expenditure Reports – July & August 2026
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 City Council Discretionary Expenditure Report for July 1, 2026, through August 31, 2026.

SUMMARY
This staff report is prepared at the request of the City Council to provide transparency with respect to the expenditure of City funds from City Council Discretionary Expenditure Accounts. These reports are for each Councilmember’s year-to-date expenditures for Fiscal Year 2026/2027, for July 1, 2026, through August 31, 2026. Each Council District receives an annual budget allocation of $3,000, and the Mayor receives $6,000.

With the adoption of the current fiscal year budget and pursuant to Resolution No. 2026- 40, unused monies from Fiscal Year 2025/2026 will be carried over to the current Fiscal Year as approved by the City Manager. The Discretionary Expenditure Reports reflect the amended budget amount.
45 ID: 26-0396 Page 2
The Expenditure Reports are routinely included in the City Council agenda as an additional means of distributing activity reports to the Council and public. The reports are to be posted to the City’s website following Council approval. The monthly reports provide unaudited information and are reconciled to the City’s general ledger. Following the end of the Fiscal Year, the financial information shall be reviewed as part of the City’s independent financial audit.

FISCAL IMPACT
No Fiscal Impact, as all funds are budgeted within the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Operating Budget.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Jasmin Rivera M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC
Executive Assistant to the Mayor and Council Office Manager of the Office of the Mayor & City Council/City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
46 ID: 26-0396 Page 3
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_CC_COUNCILDISCRETIONARYREPORT_OCT.20.2
026.docx
Attachment
s:
- City Council's Discretionary Expenditures Report_Oct.20.2026.pdf Final
Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
47 MAYOR ULISES CABRERA
Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Council Discretionary Expenditures Accounts: 1010-10-01-10015-620130 Mayor Discretionary
1010-10-01-10015-620131 Mayor Discretionary - Carryover July 1, 2026 – August 31, 2026
Date Amount Description
7/8/2026 $ 1,000.00 Sigma Beta XI | Assemblymember Dr. Corey A. Jackson's Community BBQ/Backpack Giveaway Event
8/18/2026 $ 3,000.00 Kids Youth Mentorship Services Inc. | Backpack Giveaway Event 8/31/2026 $ 250.00 Transforming Generations Forward Foundation | Backpack Giveaway Event 8/31/2026 $ 65.87 Entrepreneurs Creating Opportunities | Foundation Gala & Awards Ceremony 2026 $ 6,000.00 FY26/27 Adopted Budget Amount
$ 6,000.00 FY26/27 Amended Budget
$ (4,315.87) Total Discretionary Expenditures
$ 1,684.13 Budget Amount Remaining
Source: Unaudited financial data from the City's accounting records.

Updated as of: 10/8/2026
48 MAYOR PRO TEM ERLAN GONZALEZ
Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Council Discretionary Expenditures Accounts: 1010-10-01-10013-620113 District 3 Discretionary 1010-10-01-10013-620118 District 3 Discretionary - Carryover July 1, 2026 – August 31, 2026
Date Amount Description
No expenditures to report for July 2026
No expenditures to report for August 2026
$ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Adopted Budget Amount
$ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Amended Budget
$ - Total Discretionary Expenditures
$ 3,000.00 Budget Amount Remaining
Source: Unaudited financial data from the City's accounting records.

Updated as of: 10/8/2026
49 COUNCIL DISTRICT 1 ELENA BACA-SANTA CRUZ
Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Council Discretionary Expenditures Accounts: 1010-10-01-10011-620111 District 1 Discretionary 1010-10-01-10011-620116 District 1 Discretionary - Carryover July 1, 2026 – August 31, 2026
Date Amount Description
No expenditures to report for July 2026
No expenditures to report for August 2026
$ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Adopted Budget Amount
$ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Amended Budget
$ - Total Discretionary Expenditures
$ 3,000.00 Budget Amount Remaining
Source: Unaudited financial data from the City's accounting records.

Updated as of: 10/8/2026
50 COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 EDWARD A. DELGADO
Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Council Discretionary Expenditures Accounts: 1010-10-01-10012-620112 District 2 Discretionary 1010-10-01-10012-620117 District 2 Discretionary - Carryover July 1, 2026 – August 31, 2026
Date Amount Description
7/17/2026 $ 500.00 Moreno Valley Diamond Girls Softball Association | Contribution for National Champions
8/31/2026 $ 65.87 Entrepreneurs Creating Opportunities | Foundation Gala & Awards Ceremony 2026 $ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Adopted Budget Amount
$ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Amended Budget
$ (565.87) Total Discretionary Expenditures
$ 2,434.13 Budget Amount Remaining
Source: Unaudited financial data from the City's accounting records.

Updated as of: 10/8/2026
51 COUNCIL DISTRICT 4 CHEYLYNDA BARNARD
Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Council Discretionary Expenditures Accounts: 1010-10-01-10014-620114 District 4 Discretionary 1010-10-01-10014-620119 District 4 Discretionary - Carryover July 1, 2026 – August 31, 2026
Date Amount Description
7/15/2026 $ 500.00 Moreno Valley Diamond Girls Softball Association | Contribution for National Champions
8/21/2026 $ 30.00 Wake Up MoVal | Moreno Valley Chamber of Commerce $ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Adopted Budget Amount
$ 3,000.00 FY26/27 Amended Budget
$ (530.00) Total Discretionary Expenditures
$ 2,470.00 Budget Amount Remaining
Source: Unaudited financial data from the City's accounting records.

Updated as of: 10/8/2026
52 Report to City Council
ID: 26-0399 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Patty Rodriguez, MMC, Manager of the Office of
Mayor and City Council/City Clerk
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: COUNCIL TRAINING & TRAVEL EXPENDITURE
REPORTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 (REPORT OF:

CITY CLERK) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
TITLE SUMMARY: Council Training & Travel Expenditure Reports – July & August 2026
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Receive and file the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 City Council Training & Travel Expenditure Report for the month of July & August 2026.

SUMMARY
This staff report is prepared at the request of the City Council to provide transparency regarding the expenditure of City funds for City Council Training & Travel. Each Council District receives an annual budget allocation of $4,000, and the Mayor receives $12,000.

On September 5, 2023, the City Council approved the revision of Policy #3.06 to incorporate additional transparency requirements for reporting on travel and training forms.

The training and travel forms provide unaudited information and are reconciled to the City’s general ledger. Following the end of the Fiscal Year, the financial information shall be reviewed as part of the City’s independent financial audit. 53 ID: 26-0399 Page 2
 July 2026: Travel Activity – Mayor Cabrera and Mayor Pro Tem Gonzalez  August 2026: No Travel Activity

FISCAL IMPACT
No Fiscal Impact, as all funds are budgeted within the Fiscal Year 2026/2027 annual budget.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Jasmin Rivera M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC
Executive Assistant to the Mayor and Council Office Manager of the Office of the Mayor & City Council/City Clerk

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
54 ID: 26-0399 Page 3
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_CC_COUNCILTRAVELEXPENDITUREREPORT_OCT
.20.2026.docx
Attachmen
ts:
- Travel Authorization Form_Mayor Pro Tem
Gonzalez_NALEO_10.20.2026.pdf
- Travel Authorization Form_Mayor Cabrera_Board of
Directors_10.20.26.pdf
- Travel Authorization Form_Mayor
Cabrera_NALEO_10.20.2026_FINAL.pdf
Final
Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
55 Name:

Job Title:

Out of State?
Division:
% Split
100%
Amount CAL-Card?
If Yes
$1,200.00
$356.72
Miles: X $0.76
13 $96.75
$2 129 48
$1,674.75
Amount CAL-Card?
$1,742.95
City Manager Approval (as required)
X
Employee Signature
Part I - Travel Authorization
Immediate Supervisor Signature
X X
X
Airfare:
(620510)
Rate:

Total Travel Days (Enter # of Days) >>> 2
Registration:

Misc. Other:

Total Per
Diem:
*To receive per diem, travel must include an overnight stay .

Per diem on first and last day are to be calculated at 75% of daily per diem rate.

NALEO 43rd Annual Conference
(620510)
Mileage:
(620510)
28 Account #
Travel Authorization & Expense Reporting Form
100%
Split Total Equals
Instructions: Prior to any travel, complete Part I of this form to have travel and anticipated expenses approved. Submit a copy of this approved form with each payment expense submitted. Upon returning from travel, complete Part II of this form to confirm total expenses including any approved adjustments.

Submit form to Accounts Payable within 15 days of the travel end date. Always use the most up-to-date Travel Form located on the City’s Intranet Departure
Date & Time:

Mayor Pro Tem
GL Org Set(s)
1010-10-01-10013
Enter below the departing date and time then the return date and time. Per diem travel days will automatically be calculated. City Council
Example:
1/2/18 7:30 AM
Example:
1/2/18 5:30 PM
7/15/26 8:00 AM
X
Destination: Los Angeles, CA
Erlan Gonzalez Purpose of Trip: NALEO 43rd Annual Conference Return
Date & Time: 7/16/26 8:30 AM
Description of Expenses
(620510)
*Per Diem: (620510)
Expense Type
Lodging :

Los Angeles, CA $86
(620510)
InterContinental Los Angeles Downtown
Advance payments exceeded the actual expenses incurred. Attached is my receipt as evidence of ) Date
No adjustments are necessary. Anticipated expenses match actual expenses incurred.

Part II - Expense Reporting
Business Meals: (620510)
XX XX
Expense Details
Actual expenses exceeded the anticipated original request. Additional funds are required as listed below.

Date
(Please check the appropriate box below and provide details) City Manager Approval (as required)
reimbursement to the City. (Explain below, use negative numbers Total Anticipated Expenses:

Expenditure Code
Division Manager Approval Date
Department Head Approval
Department Head Approval
GL Org Set
Split Totals:

Employee
Signature: X
Date
Final Total Expenses:

XX X
Date
Division Manager Approval Date
1010-10-01-10013 Post -Trip
I certify that this document is
a true and accurate record of
travel expenses for official
City business.
$1,742.95
Date: Ext.

XX
13 Owner: Finance
7/7/2026
Version 4.0

InterContinental Los Angeles Downtown Valet Parking Receipts 1010-10-01-10013-620510 $68.20 84
84
$21.28
56 Travel Destination: Los Angeles, CA
(City, State)
Total Travel Days: 2
(# of Days)
Per Diem Rate: $86.00
(Daily M&IE Rate)
Travel Days Rate
First Day $64.50
Travel Days $0.00
Last Day $32.25
Total Per Diem $96.75
Breakdown
Per Diem Worksheet
Check if you ended travel before
12:00PM (Noon)
Check if you began travel after
12:00PM (Noon)
57

! "##$
! %&'
##(
)*

+,

*

-.+

/

,

/0

1 23
*

4
,
5
6

78+7 4

9:;%<!=!<>!?
@
#A(#B<##C=B#<
#DB!<!DA!
''!D?!!=
''E!6

FGHIJJK
LMNOPQRSQOTUVTUWORXMYZ[\]^_`aRY\UUbScVTUWMRMUdM
eRTXfghiFjJklmnmkompkqImJoJklmnmkomrkqImJsJntu
vSQMwGmxyzxy{|{x}~{g
TimqGH
HqpmGqnJrJqIsJntu
JGJkHJlHmktmHmqIlnJkqImJoJklmnmkomrkqImJsJntshmqnkH
JnHqkH
¡¢£¤¥
58

!"
#$%&&'()*'+,-.
!"
/"0 "1
"
#2+3,4
5+4&
+)6(3,4
5+478
%9%:
!
/"
0
"; 0#6(3,4
5+%:
%9%:
<=,,>,(,?,(@=
(@>3?,(A+,)4+=,B
4+>,(,4
+()((BC
DE
FG

/"
0
H
";
G

;"1
I
"
"

;J
AK'+3(3++?,3@L
3(,?,>,'=',M(='43,)
,33'4+'(,,3('(',=(@3),'( ,+4+,3,4+LBN

6=L,4,
B++='O=(,M(,P3(, 2B(
,+(),34@@+'4
3L,3,?),'(
,3'@'+?(3
DE
F
0
DGFQR0
2B@(,3'(B+'4+?,3)
'?4STUVW
)(,(+,3X0 G0

";Y"
Z[
REF
0
"
"\]
GE
2>(L+T)3,,,^,
F 0FQG

DE
F!0

"
0_

`;"I5+47a%C99'=bcC99'=defghijkfefjlf
hmflnoj
p;"I5+47qrC99,=bqC99'=
X;;"I5+47crC99,=bqC99'=
pG
;"I5+47:rC99,=b7%Ca9'=
`;0"
59

!"#$%#& '(')*

+,-#."%*/.01 23
4

5

5

"%6'"2

7 8

,"%#%2 $%#& '(')*

9
9

:;<=>?>@A0<B+?;<=CA;@
D>E;<=>?FG)!<%%H#&0'%, ) %2 ID *"JK)#%KJ;#
-(?(/'LMNFONP
-#J#! %#Q0<RMMSR
0#%2 &&#K"'%J-'&"2.
4

TH% MRQUNUP5
VWXX

#,K )Y Z[WXW\
]^_
5

`abcdefghijklmnonphnqrlijkljnprofiomljfoghlohsekrfjhnktljhusmljv qswulhxnfurxnenovnjhlnktviynojenjrrofynuonkrolhrlijktioziohnef{nsonnynjrk| } 5
5

8
5
VW

98

]

:;0=B
OCR
<KK %!"%*E^
B"K& E

8

~
TH)"J!"2K"'%I?)*E

0"K.E') %'#&& .
K#K E0<
D *"JK)#%K>#"&E )&#%*$'6#&(')*
D *"JK)#K"'%B. E; ID % )J1"
60

!
"#$%&'
%($
)*+,-.
/"($($%(001
23,4*!5 -
"6#7((8((
23,4*!4
"6(8((
9: ;'
<= >
?:

9:
@AB
@
CD:E
# 6#7((8((
'E
6#7((8((
F
:'
6#7((8((
?:'
= 6#7((8((
G H *.
4
IJKJJ
9L<'
:M
<>N
C
7'
<'>
L :

':E:
C<'
C

8 <'NO
L
>P

>
<7
Q2RST,*U

>
L
>V

8C
9L<'

C@
> W:

L:?X
O
L
>7Y

Y%'8
Z[\]^_`abcde[]dfbghijklm]nhcc\_op[ceb]bcqbbrbcdf_stbbcs\qqbsse\oo`^][qbssbnuvob_sb s_rbdfwsba_woe[]`[\]]bq[]nsu
xyz{|z}~{{yz~{

gbbcbwcbatb]su u
z{~x~z u
61

"

#

$%
&$
#
#
'()

#
*#$

$ #

#+
$ , ,
62 InterContinental Hotel Los Angeles - Downtown
900 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 688-7777 Fax: (213) 223-9255
07-16-26
Date Description Charges Credits
*Accommodation
Occupancy Tax
LATMD
CA Tourism
Los Angeles County Workforce
Occupancy Tax -Other
LATMD - Other
CA Tourism - Other
07-15-26
07-15-26
07-15-26
07-15-26
07-15-26
07-15-26
07-15-26
07-15-26
299.00

41.86 5.98

0.58 8.00

1.12 0.16

0.02 Total 356.72 0.00
Balance 356.72
Erlan Gonzalez
Arrival 07-15-26
Departure 07-16-26
Folio No. Room No. 5816
A/R Number
Company NALEO Educational Fund Conf. No.
:
:

Group Code NEZ
:
:
:
:
:
:

Rate Code :
20861891
Guest Signature:

I have received the goods and / or services in the amount shown heron. I agree that my liability for this bill is not waived and agree to be held personally liable in the event that the indicated person, company, or associate fails to pay for any part or the full amount of these charges. If a credit card charge, I further agree to perform the obligations set forth in the cardholder's agreement with the issuer.

Page No. :

Membership No. :

Invoice No. :

1 of 1
63

!"#" $"%&"&&' &%(#"%)"&'* ")%+
" ,( $"%-(#+'$'-( +%*."# ( $"%&/'00&%( )
)""-" %1 )"#&+( )' *%!%$#'+'$(0%-0'$2
'&&1"&%' %(%$#&&341#'&)'$+' (0%$ +"5+6
7'8"&%' %+,"%(*" )(%(#"%' %9($':$%7'8"
; "6%<00%"." +&%(#"%&1=4"$+%+%$,( *"6
>?@A%BC%D%BEF%GHGE%%I%%JKLMNOPKLQKMKLR@%SPT%UKVM@MT%WPXKLPXK%% <YY%Z<7[\%
]^_`3]^_a%
bcdZ<e%
]^_`%
7f[\Z<e%
]^_g%
h[Zd[\Z<e%
]^_i%
7jfk\Z<e%
]^_a%
lJSmnop qrstuv
wxyz%{|}%~~
64

!"#
!"
$%&'()*&

+,-./-012
-3

!"#4
!"
$%&'()*&

5.-/.-677

8-

!"#4
!"
$%&'()*&
9:;<=>?@A?:;BCDC<;<C>ED>>FDCF?;<@G;D?HICE=>J<KA@<:;E=LM>N?B>OPE=J@<AC?@C@<:? Q>AD=R@D;AS?@<S;ESCE<?AT?E<C>E;E=A?#?E<AOUA>SA;NV;E=W>A>T?A O?;A@XC<:;@B??E =>CESCEY>@ZES?D?@Q:;<U>DCGO;D>E?G;EE><
<A;E@W>ANCESDCT?@<:A>JS:?NUD>ON?E<X[
7-
\7,
\]-
^.-
2+-
+-_]^++`
9;<?AC@U>DCGOV;E=<:C@U;AF@:>Q@Q:;<<:;<D>>F@DCF?>E<:?SA>JE=LaC<J;<?=;D>ES<:? bD?E=;D?c;AA>Q@X>E?>W<:?D;@<E;<JA;D#B><<>N@<A?<G:?@>W<:?Y>@ZES?D?@dCT?AX<:C@Le[ ;GA?SA??EQ;OCE<?SA;<?@BC>@Q;D?@E;<CT?:;BC<;<;E=SA??ECEWA;@<AJG<JA?<:;<KD<?A@ I>JE=?=CEfegX"ZhIC@>E?>Wi;DCW>AEC;R@D;AS?@<E>EUA>K<>AS;ECj;<C>E@X@?ATCESN>A? <:;Ef
kX CE=CTC=J;D@;EEJ;DDO;GA>@@@?T?EG>JE<C?@Ll:C@N>BCD?<>JAQCDDCE<A>=JG? U;A<CGCU;E<@<>"ZhIR@CE<?SA;<?=@?ATCG?N>=?D;E=:CS:DCS:<:>Q<:?>AS;ECj;<C>E[ m

/
n2.0o
-

p
Z"#4
!"
m

/
65

!"#

!
$%&'()*&
+,-./0-1.2,1

34.4,3,-.405

34.4,067.28605-8.
9 :
;<

; =;<
>?5,,@.ABCDE-@5,@B06+.48-02,.@,5BCF-,@,G-8-HI0I,-4CJ +KF.-@J +KF [email protected]ME-@2,.@,5BN08-7.28605-8.OBI0B4P50I8-,-406GL8.2B400P,-4?,Q

!"
#$%& '()*+,-'.*
/0123450123
6789:;<8
#$%&=*(>?.*!(@A*.+
/0123450123
6789:;<8
%BC?D?+@(E@F+F
G+C(@,?.H"?)"@)
I
JK

L
4M

NOPQ3R
S

T
L
UM
UV

U
W
W

SS

W

W
4
X

PT

NOPQ

UNOPQP

MY

S
X
Z

T
W
R

U

4

T

S
Y

W

X

[KM

U
\

!"
$*']*(FC?,$'DF
!@-?.^?G!('.+?.*
501234__0_23
66

!

"
#

$%&'()*)+,-(%.+-/00*+(12*%)34-125%6175'18'(9:'';
< =>?@ABB B>?@
CDEFGHIE
?

J

K

#
#

K

#

L
M

#

@

#N

412'( O212' P.)*6*Q17 R%.)2S T8.612*%)
UVV%(81W*7*2S*)U62*%)3X(%2'62*)+Y10*7*'91)8T99')2*17O; < =>?@ABB B>?@
CDEFGHIE
Z M [
\@

#]#
?
^

_
M
?
M

^`
#

a
_
M
`
412'( O212' P.)*6*Q17 R%.)2S T8.612*%)
b121R')2'(91)8U/c%%03P1d*)+2-'b'174%(dV%(e%.(; < =>?@ABB B>?@
CDEFGHIE
f

g

hg

L

`
R-1*(3,-'U))*'TiR19'SY%.)812*%)
#

f
a
j

j`
4%(d9-%QO'99*%)R%)2(*W.2%(93P*6(%9%V21)8O%.2-'()R17*V%()*1T8*9%) ?

"

"k

"?lA`
67

!"#"$ %#"$& '()*+*,#- ./()"0
1)-/+2*)34/(5*)36$5/(&+$578()9*)3:;&#)"5:#)9</+#-= >?@ABCC?CA
DEFGHIJF
K

L
M

N
O
P
Q
R

P
R

!"#"$ '()*+*,#- ./()"0
%/&25T/,!$55*/)./)"&*U("/&78*&5"VW$&*+#)
X
O

Y

R

ZS

Y
Q
R
Z[

\\7]^V'_`
a*+2/bb*)<V7VcV<de%/&-9.(,.$-$U&#"*/)
CC?fgBC?@AM
DEFGHIJF
h

RS

M

i

S
S
i

S
S
_&$5$)"*)3_#&")$&7`T$./+#j./-#./W,#)0
S
Q

k
Q
Q R ZM

hQ
l

X

X QM

QRQ

QQ

Rk nKO

RQ

Q

QQ
o7]^_'_`
68

!"#$%&'#"#$%&
()*+,-.*
&/01234/561789:
;1<=;/8021>?9?@96
A/BC079>9B;1<=;/8021>
D=599E9>5B<910F/</
;1<=C<</609=
;1<=/GA/BC079>9B
H

I
J K
I
L/87/M96032/80<6=A3<10/BN9>O95@81>5P305617N<0/QRB/?9/G<N3<N1B</6=1B80596 O69BB869STN1BG/68?@6107B</79<N96<N69951B<102<M/129BG/6<N69986790<R2/0092<95 2/0M96B3<1/0B"3>93510721M1>617N<B3<</609=/0QN3<<N9F8O69?9;/86<UB;3>>31B5921B1/0V W

X
JYJZ
J[\]
^
_"$$%&'`"$$%&
()*+,-.*
T/0=;a65903B
E/6?96b01<95F<3<9B49O69B90<3<1M9
c63@=/86O/O2/60305B9<<>910G/63<689D/>>=Q//59dO9619029PeCAfgB<=>9hi0</<N9E169 1B3O/Q96G8>5/28?90<36=<632107T/0=;a65903BUj/8609=G6/?;3>1G/6013763BB6//<B 32<1M1B?</<N9bSFS;/0769BBP9dO>/6107A3<10/>93596BN1ORG3?1>=R305<N9B3261k29B/G3>1GV 10O8@>12B96M129E/>>/Q107<N9B26990107j/10T/0=;a65903B<N9k>??3l96B305A3<10/B10 m

nX
Jo

I
p

q"$$C&'_"$$%&
69

!"#$%&'!"#$%
()*+,-.*
%/0123451670
894:1;40<=9/>46=/94
?@A1B/901@C<@<4C40@<4
D/E49<D1F@:

C=4@G49
?@A1B/901@C<@<4$::46EAH

I

J

K
J

L
MN
OP
Q1B<HH4@9:@R/ST;U@9;DVD/HE@AW@;@F1:1/0!5@<10/A4@;49:S/9R@01X4;@0;94@;H</R/F490V >W1:E94@GB@:<1:@E/3<UW494<W@<F1:1/0:<@0;:</;@HY@0;UW@<1<;46@0;:/B@AA/B3:Z [

K\
]

J
!^_$%&'!^_$%
()*+,-.*

K\I
`
J
aJ
!^_$%&'!^_$%
()*+,-.*
K
b

M

Jc
] ]
d1A:W194e9@0;f@AA9//6894&Q30g<1/0@94@
>W4h$5Ti%@9G4<=A@g4R1F4:8@9<049:SQ9140;:S@0;j40;/9:S@04kW1E1</9E//<WU1<W@0Z /==/9<301<H</;1:<91E3<46@<491@A:@0;40R@R4U1<W646E49:10@W1RW&<9@Blg@94@>W4 TF49HH4@9@<<W4h$5Ti$003@A?/0B4940g4Sh$5TiT;3g@<1/0@AQ30;m/10:B/9g4:U1<W@ A/g@A0/0=9/l</9R@01X@<1/0</R1F4E@gG</<W4g/66301<HV>W1:H4@9S@<<40;44:U1AAA40; <W419@::1:<@0g4</@W@0;:&/0:49F1g4=9/m4g<E404l<10R<W4?W1A;940n:f390Q/30;@<1/0S@Z o
70

!"#$%&"
'()*+,-./)01
2(-3/-4)56/.7606/18/9-/1/)6:

5;</=/>/0=()
?-/15./)6
'</+<5;0@(7;<((=
A

B
C D D
EF

DGADH

ADHGD
GI

!"#$%&"

/=5110J/==1
79/;50=
115160)66(6</?-/15./)6
>(-6<
3/-5;0K1LM5=.5)@'-0./1:

)0NM65/--/O
?-/15./)6P+QR
L5/)/160-+(33M)56*Q;()(35;1

B
D

D

D

DG

SI

!"#$%&"
?MT=5;1/-U5;/./30).1/U/-*6<5)@V0).W065)(=/0./-1;0--*6<06X/5@<65)X0*16<06 -0-/=*@/660=Y/.0T(M6Z[)195-/.T*6</\=3[)6(6</25-/0).6</=/@0;*(]=/0./-1=5Y/ +()@-/1130)'()*+,-./)01^6<51510;0).5.^]0;5=5606/.;()U/-1065()0T(M6X<06560;6M0==*:

E_D`B

[0).0M6(3065()0-/;<0)@5)@6</a(T=0).1;09/]016VTM6.51-M965()51)K66</X<(=/ 16(-*Z
;-(116</;(M)6-*^6</6-0./10-/9-(U5)@6(T/1(3/(]6</3(16-/15=5/)60).:

E
Cc

D D
[)6(.0*K15335@-065();=5306/^1;<((=.516-5;6(]\;50=10).=(;0==/0./-1;0)K60]](-.6(T/ ;0M@<6M)9-/90-/.Z'<511/115()./=5U/-16<//d0;6=/@0=]-03/X(-Y)//./.V5);=M.5)@:
71

!

"
#$%$& '()*%$+,-
.&%/$0*%1&,-$0&2+-&3'-4)1+-5'6&178%9+/7:%-;**&44< =>?>>@==?>>
ABCDEFGC
H

HII
"
HI

J

!KLI "
L

M)-+*+N%/ :,)-$7
O1&4&-$+-5O%1$-&13P%+4&1O&19%-&-$&

Q
R

L"
Q
SRK
"R
TL
L
L
R

U
L RL
LV
WW3XX;MOY
Z-$0&[%$+,-%/#$%5&32&%(&14#0%N+-5$0&M,9&-$
==?>>@=\?>>
ABCDEFGC
I

]

H
Q

"
"

H
Q

^%$&1 #$%$& M)-+*+N%/ :,)-$7 '()*%$+,-
O1&4&-$+-5O%1$-&13Y0&:,*%_:,/%:,9N%-7

L
QQLILI
STI`

S

QI
I ! LL" S

V
Wa3XXOMOY
72

!"#$%!
&'()'*+,(-./-0(1&-*234*.,-05*(/')67(/8'22-69:;<=>'>?').8-)*/75/ '@')5,
A-)2+B0CD'>7E@*2.F'2'?)*(7-@C)'.'@('+?,G*7.')
')>*@'@('*@+8'*(0)7@5*/-.('+
20@F/H.C'F7*250'.(*CC'*)*@F'.H*@+*@'2'F()7FH.(*+70> 6-)(/,*(>-.C/')'IJ/7.27K'2,L
M
NOPQPR

ST U
RT

SVW
UX XY
Z
[
\

!"#$%!
]027^@B*.()-
B/7'8<_'F0(7K'=8EF')H;*(7@-BL
;*(7@-B->>0@7(,`-0@+*(7-@
9'227'&-)?'*
`-)>')D'F)'(*),-8D(*('
D(*('-8a/-+'b.2*@+
Z

QX Y X
J)0.(7@+'>-F)*(7F7@.(7(0(7-@.7.0@+')C)'..0)'c*@+.(*('*@+2-F*22'*+').*)'(/'-@'. /-2+7@5(/'27@'IJ/7.8-)0>F0(.(/)-05/(/'@-7.'(-'_*>7@'/-6'2'F(7-@.*F(0*22,6-)dH 6/*(F-@.(7(0(7-@*2*0(/-)7(,,-0/-2+*.*.(*('-)2-F*2-8EF7*2H*@+6/*(.*8'50*)+.'_7.((L N
efPQPR

Rg
RT
h
PXSiTTXjkXT[
\lm

!"#$%!
no
B/*)2'.pB/0Fdpa-F/*
`-0@+')
D-27+*)7(,D()*('57'.
q
q

7d'
*+)7+

)7@F7C*2
&)*..)--(.;*?
r gs

0220C*F/*7)c(/7.-@'t.0@E2(')'+IB/0Fda-F/**@+ 7d'
*+)7+H(6--8(/'./*)C'.(
*@+>-.(F*@+7+K-7F'.7@;*(7@-C-27(7F.H*)'(*C7@5*27K''C7.-+'-8IJ/';*(7@-u-(')75/(L 73

!"##$%&'"(#$%
)*+,-./+
01
23456527893:;<<<
=$>?@59AB5ACDEE7F9GH8?94?9I
$54GF8?
67AF5JK3L95:
69F@59
K4F95%?C?9G4?9CG
M

N

O?FAPD2QRB5BS59G;479CA59G;7ATTFGCFAU3FGV5TU35GCGE?97W?JJXY??T>J7B5@5AFAU B79ZFAU!#X579G?E7T@7A[FAU27CFA?J57T59GVF4FADB59F[7AT5B?[97[X\]VFGU?JT5AI 7AAF@59G79X[5J5S97CF?AYFJJE57C395CV5495G5AC7CF?A?ECV5QTY79T^ ^?XS7JDY79TE?9 _

abc

'"##D%&de"(#$%
_
f
`

'"(#D%&g"(#D%
)*+,-./+
M

h ai
jFECXX579G?E27CFA?J57T59GVF4T5G59@5GB?95CV7A7k3F5CB?9AFAU\>9?3ATGE?985J5S97CF?A ZF[ZG?EE67X(YFCVU957C[?EE55;JF@56OKF::J55A59UX;7ATCV5[?B47AX?EV3AT95TG?EI 5J5[C5T?El[F7JG7AT[F@F[J57T59GYV?V7@5U7CV595TCVFGY55ZC?T?G?B5CVFAUB57AFAUE3J 74

!!"##$ %
&
'()*+,-..(**+,
/0123451

!

"#
"
$%&%' ()*+,+-&. /0),&%+1*
234/5(&67'%-.&,'
89:;<=;9;;
>?@ABCD@
234/5$'6E+,'F61G',%
89:;<=;9;;
>?@ABCD@
H)+.0+*IJ1)K+*IL$',)6'M)%)6'N$%&%'&*041,&.$1.)%+1*K 89:;<==9;;

"

O

P"

"P"

"

"QRSO

P

P
"T
/UV+W+%16J1K%KN3*%V61-+,XY+7Y17
Z
[

<#"

R\! ]
^O

#

_

`P
PST
OO
"a

P"

SP
<

R

aa
\! ]"

\! ]
"#"
b

S
O

cP^"aQRa

S

<
O
bP

d
"
#"

T
75

!
"
#
$
%
&'

(
%

%()

+,-,. /012324-5 6701,8
9:.;.1,21<9-:,1.:;=+,-,.>-:?-1@A.55;>-:<7
B

(C*

(
CE
E
F

(
(HE
F(
"
D
G(G

E
F

(G"
'
(

)
IJ=JJK/9L
M.-@.:;N24M-O;=975238219:-3,23.

PQRQQ HPPRSQ
T??2<:-,271U1V7:3.?.1,-1@M73-5U3717?2.;=LN.67;,W PQRQQ HPPRSQ

XY
Z
(

C[

(
%**((

(%C
]]
*
*

^#
'_
$

'

`%Z Z
'C
'(a)
+,-,. A-,.: /012324-5 6701,8 U@03-,271
9:7,.3,21<90O523L:0;,=U,N23-5M.-@.:;N24+,:-,.<2.;V7:W PQRQQ HPPRSQ

*(E
E
F

(%(
'(
((

\

'

'

((

H(

*
CHE

(

b(D

E
CC

(cG

'*'
(
"

*GG

((_
**G

'
*
(

(

*G)

_
(
G_

*
*C

'

d'
(
_
D

C

(

d'
_

"D
'
(
(

(
(

(

'_
(
((E

'("
''

(

G
(_G

'
'

G
((G

('

(

C
(F(

((D
)
76

!"# $! !" %&'()(* + ,-&) !(.' /.&'!0
112345%67

/ +(8.#'( 9&:"#' !.#( +;.#&<
==>?@ABC=D>@@EB
FG

H

I
J
J
H
G

;.#L #-7.M"!N"#2O" -"#PN(*Q"0.'-!N(P%.<"'!
==>?@ABC=>@@EB
RSTUVWXT

YZY

[

G H

B

!"# $! !" %&'()(* + /.&'!0 ,-&) !(.'
\.P!27.0.!
O&')N".'/.'!#(:&!.#2/N"]#.'

K
I

HH

I

121_6%67
O" -"#PN(*;.#&<2;(`('M Q#.a"'$0P!"<2b<<(M# !(.'cd =>=eEBCD>?@EB
77

!
""
#"$
%&'

()*+, -*)*+ ./01213)4 56/2)*170 87/0*9
:!#";%<<!=>? @: "
% !
A
B=!=CDE:;%;=!FC&" D%"=;!
%G<!"
<
#H
IJKLMNOPQRSTSUVWXXYOPQRZ
N[Z[N\[]^_W`aba]cdeROKfeX
gcf]OZefKfhLNKiRVfKfh
LeNROZefKNPefOjeROKfUTkldmlnm^
opqrp
struvwxyuz
yp{rx|xy}r~ry|ryp{rxx~
x{{xpy
puxyx|wp{
rwp

opqrp
struvwxyuz
x~wvt|pvwxyp{ty
78

&'()
*+*,,-./

!"
#$$%
0
&'
(12
3&'()
*+*,,
-./0
&'
(12
3
79 80
� .:!!It,
..... &:!!.� Travel Authorization & Expense Reporting Form Instructions: fcJsH:. !2 i!!!I! travel, complete Part I of this form to have travel and anticipated expenses approved. Submit a copy of this approved form with each payment expense submitted. LI.Qon ratumlng from travel, complete Part U of this form to confirm total expenses including any approved adjustments.

Submit form to Accounts Payable within 15 days of the travel end date. al�ill/11,1,e tb.e mas 1.1e;.to-datg ltilk'.lll ER.Clll. lawll.flll. aa tb.e �ttv•:i latlilaet Emeloxee Signature Immediate Su!!!!rvisor Signature
Part I - Travel Authorization
X ' X
Name: Ulises Cabrera Purpose of Trip: League of Cal Cities - Board of Directors Meeting Job Title: Mayor Destination: Redondo Beach, CA Out of State? r
Division: City Council Enter below the depa,tlrq date and time then the return date and time. Per diem travel days will automaticallv be calculated.

GL Org Set(s) %Split Departure
1010-10-01-10015 100% Split Total Equals Date &Time: 7/16/26 12:00 PM X
X
Return 7/18/26 3:00 PM 100% Date &Time:

Expense Type Account# Description of Expenses
Registration: (620510) Ma)IOf.....,reraattendldlheCOflfetMOl!ln /J/s capacttyas fie League otGalftlmla or/es.

Plesident "flhe t.a«no ca.iws.

Lodging : (620510) Sonesta Hotels, Resorts & Cruises
Mileage: (620510) Miles: 48 X Rate: $0.76
Airfare: (620510)
*Per Diem: (620510) Redondo Beach. CA $86
Total Travel Days (Enter# of Days) >» 3
•To receive per diem, travel must Include an overnight stay. Total Per Per fl.mi. aa first and las. �am ta bt: gi/_r;.u.lat.ed at. Z�2' gf � � d.imi. rate, Diem:

Misc. Other: (620510)
Business Meals: (620510)
Division Manager Approval Date Total Anticipated Expenses:
� X City Manager Approval (as required)
' De J Head Approval Date t,V (._ X �l1l� X
Example:
112/18 7:30 AM
Example:
112/18 5:30 PM
Amount CAL-Card?
dlfYes
$0.00 r-,
$1,011.05 r-,
$36.48 r
r
Check box to decine Per
r Diem, whereby actual
recei_pts must be submitted
$215.00
r·
r'
$1,262.53
Date
X
Par\ II ��v.&:.nse Reporting (Please check the appropriate box below and provide details) 0 No adjustments are necessary. Anticipated expenses match actual expenses incurred. @
Advance payments exceeded the actual expenses incurred. Attached is my receipt as evidence of J reimbursement to the City. (Explain below, use negative numbers n
Actual expenses exceeded the anticipated original reauest. Additional funds are reauired as listed below.

Expense Details Expenditure Code Amount CAL-Card?
Sonesta Hotels Parking Lot Fee 101 0-1 0-01-10015-62051 0 $95.69 r ----------------
Ir
Poar-Tttp Employee I GLOrg Set
1010-10-01-10015
---------
I certify that this document is I
a true and accuratereccrd of Signature: X
traloet expe,-s : Split Totals: for ollcial
City business. Date: 08/17/2026 Ext. ----_._ __ --------111---------- Division Manager Approval Date Final Total Expenses:
$1,358.22
X X City Manager Approval (as required) Date
De� �mz:teadQ. ,pproval - Date
X X &rt{� X X
O�F� Version4.0
7/2212CYJ.6
$1,358.22
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 NOTE: Reservation modified from July 13-16 to July 14-16, reducing the stay from three nights to two nights. The Travel Authorization Form reflects the revised reservation.
98 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
League of California Cities Latino Caucus INVOICE
Make Payable to: Ulises Cabrera DATE: 07/24/26
Bill To: League of California Cities
Attn: Ulises Cabrera, LCCLC President
1400 K Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone 562.786.9079
AMOUNT
Operations Board Redondo Beach: Board Meal $ 381.80
Operations Parking NALEO President: Parking $ 68.20
Operations Hotel NALEO President: Hotel Intercontinental $ 713.44 Operations Registration NALEO President: Registration $ 1,200.00 TOTAL $ 2,363.44
President’s Signature:

Ulises Cabrera, President
If you have any questions concerning this invoice co916.316.2310

DESCRIPTION
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!
NOTE: Reimbursement to Cal Cities for the Redondo Beach:

Board Meal is pending confirmation and processing. The
city did not purchase the meal.
117

LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES REIMBURSEMENT CHECK
118
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0398 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kyle Warsinski, Economic Development Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: MORENO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING – HEALTH &

WELLNESS CENTER AND BUSINESS &

EMPLOYMENT RESOURCE CENTER PARTNERSHIP
TITLE SUMMARY: Memorandum Of Understanding Between Moreno Valley Unified School District Health And Wellness Center And The City Of Moreno Valley
DISTRICT: Not Applicable
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

SUMMARY
This report recommends approval of the MOU with the Moreno Valley Unified School District Health & Wellness Center, which outlines the duties and responsibilities agreed 119
ID: 26-0398 Page 2
upon to coordinate workforce and business development services for the district’s families and to facilitate mutual support. The Business & Employment Resource Center (BERC) will collaborate with the Health & Wellness Center to host programs and provide staff for select services offered there.

DISCUSSION
The Moreno Valley Economic Development Department’s BERC, in collaboration with key organizations, offers technical assistance workshops and one-on-one consulting to businesses and job seekers through the Hire MoVal initiative, as well as other programs.

With a population exceeding 215,000 residents and a diverse business landscape comprising over 4,500 establishments, Moreno Valley is committed to fostering economic prosperity and facilitating career opportunities for its residents.

The Moreno Valley Unified School District Health & Wellness Center was established in 2025 to expand access to essential health, wellness, and supportive services for students and families in Moreno Valley. The Center provides a range of resources designed to address barriers to student and family well-being, including food and meal assistance, showers and laundry facilities, clothing, mental health services, dental and medical care, and connections to additional community resources.

The Health & Wellness Center serves as a centralized, supportive resource where students and families can access services that promote educational success, health, stability, and overall well-being.

The proposed MOU is a strategic partnership intended to enhance on-site career services, specifically for MVUSD families. This partnership aims to: 1) facilitate pathways to education and career opportunities; 2) enhance access to resources; and 3) promote inclusive economic growth by leveraging the strengths and resources of both organizations. The BERC and the Health & Wellness Center are poised to make meaningful strides in addressing workforce needs for families and fostering a thriving community through collaborative initiatives outlined in the MOU, such as hosting events, providing marketing support, and referring participants.

MVUSD agrees to support workforce opportunities for residents by:
a. Referring Moreno Valley families in need of employment services to the BERC. b. Utilizing the BERC referral link for families.
c. Promoting BERC events, including workshops, hiring events, partner office hours, and resources.
d. Communicating with city staff about resources, hiring events, and workshop needs. e. Providing BERC staff with marketing materials to promote local programs. f. Providing a location for BERC staff to present career-focused workshops and host tailored job fairs for families on-site.
g. Promoting scheduled workshops and events in partnership with the BERC to families utilizing the various communication channels available to MVUSD. h. Including city staff in planning for future programming opportunities at the Health & Wellness Center.
120
ID: 26-0398 Page 3
The City agrees to support these programs by:
a. Referring MVUSD families in need of supportive services to the Health & Wellness Center.
b. Providing names and contact information of families who utilize the BERC after being referred by MVUSD.
c. Assisting in coordinating hiring events at the Health & Wellness Center, including sending invitations and registering local employers.
d. Providing staff to host/lead workshops at the Health & Wellness Center, subject to staff availability, facility availability, and mutual scheduling. i. Program topics to include:

1. General Information Sessions focused on BERC resources

2. Signature Workshops focused on resume building, interview skills, financial literacy, and digital literacy
e. Utilizing city and BERC marketing and promotion channels to promote MVUSD programs.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve and authorize the MOU to establish a partnership with the Health & Wellness Center. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Reject the MOU, which will result in the inability for the city to provide programs, events, and resources on-site at the Health & Wellness Center. Staff does not recommend this alternative.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact related to the proposed Memorandum of Understanding.

NOTIFICATION
Posting of the Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Stephanie Macias Kyle Warsinski
Business & Workforce Development Division Manager Economic Development Director

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library
121
ID: 26-0398 Page 4

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
122
ID: 26-0398 Page 5
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_EDD_MVUSD MOU.docx
Attachments: - MVUSD_HWC_MV_MOU.pdf
Final Approval Date: Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Kyle Warsinski
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
123

MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING

BETWEEN

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY /

MORENO VALLEY

BUSINESS & EMPLOYMENT RESOURCE CENTER
(BERC)
AND

MORENO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER
DRAFT
124

1. INTRODUCTION
This Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") is made and entered into as of the Effective Date (defined in Section 6.H) by and between the City of Moreno Valley, a general law city and a municipal corporation of the State of California located in Riverside County, by and through its Business & Employment Resource Center (collectively "CITY") and the Moreno Valley Unified School District, a public school district organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, by and through its Health & Wellness Center (collectively, "DISTRICT"). The CITY and DISTRICT are each referred to herein as a “PARTY” and collectively as the "PARTIES."

2. Purpose
This MOU outlines the agreement between the PARTIES to work in partnership to provide career services for families of the DISTRICT at the Moreno Valley Business & Employment Resource Center, an America’s Job Center of California (also referred to as “BERC”), and at the Moreno Valley Unified School District Health & Wellness Center.

3. Background
The Moreno Valley Unified School District Health & Wellness Center was established in 2025 to expand access to essential health, wellness, and supportive services for students and families in the Moreno Valley community. The Center provides a range of resources designed to address barriers to student and family well-being, including food and meal assistance, showers and laundry facilities, clothing, mental health services, dental and medical care, and connections to additional community resources.

The Health & Wellness Center serves as a centralized, supportive resource where students and families can access services that promote educational success, health, stability, and overall well-being.

4. The PARTIES’ Obligations
A. DISTRICT Obligations:
a. Refer Moreno Valley families in need of employment services to the BERC; b. Utilize the BERC referral link for families;
c. Promote BERC events, including workshops, hiring events, partner office hours, and resources;
d. Communicate with CITY staff about resources, hiring events, and workshop needs;
e. Provide BERC staff with marketing materials to promote local programs; f. Provide a location for BERC staff to present career-focused workshops and host tailored job fairs to families on-site;
g. Promote scheduled workshops and events in partnership with the BERC to families utilizing the various communication channels available to the DISTRICT; and
2 DRAFT
125
h. Include CITY staff in planning for future programming opportunities at the Health & Wellness Center.

B. CITY Obligations:
a. Refer Moreno Valley families in the DISTRICT in need of supportive services to the Health & Wellness Center;
b. Provide names and contact information of families who utilize the BERC after being referred by the DISTRICT;
c. Assist in coordinating hiring events at the Health & Wellness Center, including sending invitations and registering local employers; d. Provide staff to host/lead workshops at the Health & Wellness Center, subject to staff availability, facility availability, and mutual scheduling; and i. Program topics to include:

1. General Information Sessions focused on BERC resources

2. Signature Workshops focused on resume building, interview skills, financial literacy, and digital literacy;
e. Utilize CITY and BERC marketing and promotion channels to promote DISTRICT programs.

5. Costs
A. DISTRICT Not Obligated for Any Costs
The CITY acknowledges and agrees that the DISTRICT shall not be liable for any costs incurred by the CITY, including any of its affiliates, in connection with the administration and/or implementation of this MOU or any related partnership or program activities.

The CITY further acknowledges and agrees that the DISTRICT shall not be liable in any way for payment of any costs, fees, wages, or any other amounts to be paid to any party arising out of or related to this MOU.

B. CITY Not Obligated for Any Costs
The DISTRICT acknowledges and agrees that the CITY shall not be liable for any costs incurred by the DISTRICT, including any of its affiliates, in connection with the administration and/or implementation of this MOU or any related partnership or program activities.

The DISTRICT further acknowledges and agrees that the CITY shall not be liable in any way for payment of any costs, fees, wages, or any other amounts to be paid to any party arising out of or related to this MOU. 3 DRAFT
126

6. General Terms
It is further mutually agreed by the PARTIES as follows:

A. Indemnity; Hold Harmless
CITY shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the DISTRICT and its officers, employees, representatives, volunteers, and agents from and against any and all liability, demands, claims, loss, actions or proceedings, damages, costs, and expenses incidental thereto (including without limitation costs of defense, settlement, and reasonable attorneys’ fees) of every nature arising out of, related to, or in connection with the CITY’s performance of work hereunder, except that the DISTRICT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY for any such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the DISTRICT under this MOU.

The DISTRICT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY and its officers, employees, representatives, volunteers, and agents from and against any and all liability, demands, claims, loss, actions or proceedings, damages, costs, and expenses incidental thereto (including without limitation costs of defense, settlement, and reasonable attorneys’ fees) of every nature arising out of, related to, or in connection with the DISTRICT’s performance of work hereunder, except that the CITY shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the DISTRICT for any such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY under this MOU. The obligations under this Section 6.A shall survive the expiration or termination of this MOU.

B. Termination
Either PARTY may terminate this MOU for any reason upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to the other PARTY. Except as otherwise provided herein, upon termination of this MOU, neither PARTY shall have any further obligation to the other.

C. Legal Authority
Nothing in this MOU binds the CITY or the DISTRICT to perform any action that is beyond its legal authority.

D. Conflict of Interest
No member, official, or employee of the CITY or the DISTRICT shall have any personal interest, direct or indirect, in this MOU, nor shall any such member, official, or employee participate in any decision relating to this MOU that affects his or her personal interest or the interests of any corporation, partnership, or association in which he or she is directly or indirectly interested.
4 DRAFT
127
E. Assignment
No assignment of this MOU or of any part or obligation of performance hereunder shall be made, either in whole or in part, by either PARTY without the prior written consent of the other PARTY.

F. Entire Agreement
It is expressly agreed that this MOU embodies the entire agreement of the PARTIES in relation to the subject matter hereof, and that no other agreement or understanding, verbal or otherwise, relative to this subject matter, exists between the PARTIES at the time of execution.

G. Amendments and Modifications
It is agreed that the rights, interests, understandings, agreements, and obligations of the respective PARTIES pertaining to the subject matter of this MOU may not be amended, modified, or supplemented in any respect except by a subsequent written instrument evidencing the express written consent of each of the PARTIES hereto and duly executed by the PARTIES.

H. Effective Date; Term
The term of this MOU shall commence on the date of the last signature below (“Effective Date”) and shall continue for 24 months (“Term”), unless extended by written mutual agreement of the PARTIES or terminated earlier. [Signatures on Following Page]
[Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank]
5 DRAFT
128
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused their duly authorized representatives to execute this MOU as of the dates written below. 6 “DISTRICT”
Moreno Valley Unified School District, a
public school district organized and
existing under the laws of the State of
California, by and through its Health &
Wellness Center
By:
________________________________
Susana Lopez
Chief Business Official
“CITY”
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, a local
government agency located in Riverside
County, by and through its Economic
Development Department
By:
____________________________
Brian Mohan
City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM
10/8/2026
DRAFT
129
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0382 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Felicia London, Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: EXPAND CITYWIDE COPIER LEASE AND
MAINTENANCE SERVICES (REPORT OF: FINANCIAL

AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES) (NOT APPLICABLE)
TITLE SUMMARY: Expand Citywide Copier Lease and Maintenance Services DISTRICT: Not Applicable
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

SUMMARY
130
ID: 26-0382 Page 2
This report recommends City Council approval of the expanded citywide copier and printer services, including the City’s agreement with VEIT, LLC for multifunction copiers.

Due to new facilities and increased equipment and printing needs, approval is requested to increase the annual not-to-exceed amount to $150,000 for equipment leases, maintenance, and usage-based printing services.

DISCUSSION
The City initially entered into a five-year agreement with VEIT, LLC, formerly known as Visual Edge IT, for its citywide copier lease and maintenance services. Pursuant to the City’s Municipal Code 3.12.260, the City leveraged the Sourcewell cooperative agreement, a competitively bid contract available to public agencies nationwide. VEIT, LLC, an authorized reseller under Sourcewell’s program, submitted a proposal that met the City’s technical requirements and provided significant savings compared with continuing with the previous vendor or conducting a standalone solicitation.

The agreement with VEIT, LLC, included equipment leasing and a per-copy pricing structure for maintenance, toner, and related services, aligning costs with actual usage rather than relying solely on fixed flat rates. This model supports the City’s ongoing sustainability initiatives, which encourage staff to use digital workflows and reduce reliance on paper copies. As staff continue to transition to electronic document management, the City will benefit from reduced copy volumes and corresponding savings.

The equipment lease portion of the agreement was subsequently assigned to GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation. Under this arrangement, lease payments are made to GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation, while VEIT, LLC, continues to provide maintenance, toner, and price-per-print services for the copier fleet.

Since the original agreement was established, the City’s copier and printer needs have expanded. The addition of new City facilities and changes in departmental operations have required additional equipment and increased service capacity.

The expanded equipment and service requirements have increased the City’s anticipated annual expenditures for copier and printer leases, maintenance, and usage-based services. Although the original agreement was within the City Manager’s approval authority, the combined annual expenditures for the expanded fleet are now expected to exceed $75,000 per fiscal year.

Approval of the recommended action will authorize continued services and establish a combined not-to-exceed amount of $150,000 per fiscal year for the City’s multifunction copier fleet. This authorization will allow the City to maintain reliable printing and copying services while accommodating current facility and operational needs.

ALTERNATIVES
131
ID: 26-0382 Page 3

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions for the expanded citywide copier lease and maintenance service program, including the agreement with VEIT, LLC, and acknowledgment of the assignment of the VEIT, LLC equipment lease to GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Do not approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. This alternative may limit the City’s ability to meet the expanded copier requirements of the new facilities and affected departments. Staff does not recommend this alternative.

FISCAL IMPACT
The recommended actions will have no additional fiscal impact. Funding for copier leases, maintenance, and printing services are included in the budgets of multiple City departments under Facilities Maintenance (Fund 7310).

NOTIFICATION
Publication of the agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Stephanie Suss Felicia London
Senior Management Analyst Chief Financial Officer/City Treasurer Concurred By: Concurred By:

Diana Vargas Anna Chacon
Purchasing & Sustainability Division Manager Deputy Finance Director (Administration)

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
None.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
132
ID: 26-0382 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_FMS_PS_CITYWIDE COPIER
SERVICES.docx
Attachments: - Agreement with Visual Edge IT .pdf
- 1st Amendment to Agreement with VEIT.pdf
- Assignment Letter with VEIT.pdf
Final Approval Date: Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

No Signature found
Diana Vargas
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
Date: January 29, 2026
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick St
Moreno Valley, CA 92553
Re: Notice of Assignment
Dear Sir/Madam:

This letter serves as notice to you that your agreement for the use, lease, rental, or financing of personal property between your company and Visual Edge IT, Inc. (“Your Vendor”), which agreement is identified in our records as Agreement No. 2025-268 (the “Agreement”) was assigned by Your Vendor to GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation (“GreatAmerica”).

Please send all future correspondence concerning the Agreement to:

GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation
P.O. Box 609
Cedar Rapids, IA 52406-0609
Please send all of your future payments under the Agreement to:

GreatAmerica Financial Services Corporation
P.O. Box 660831
Dallas, TX 75266-0831
All future account management concerning your Agreement will be handled by GreatAmerica whom you can contact at 866-803-2659.

The supply and service of your equipment leased on the Agreement will be handled by Visual Edge IT. Service and supply requests can be placed via phone or email:
(800) 828-4801 or [email protected] / [email protected] Sincerely,
Janet Jackson
VP Sales Operations
Docusign Envelope ID: FBAEBC07-45BC-4A75-9635-219359E67BCC 161
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0375 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Natalie Potter, Human Resources Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: LIST OF PERSONNEL CHANGES (REPORT OF:

HUMAN RESOURCES) (DISTRICT: NOT APPLICABLE)
TITLE SUMMARY: List of Personnel Changes (Septembert 1, 2026 – September 30, 2026)
DISTRICT: Not Applicable
Recommendation(s)
The City Council:

1. Ratify the list of personnel changes as described.

DISCUSSION
The attached list of personnel changes scheduled since the last City Council meeting is presented for the Council's ratification.

Staffing of the City positions ensures the assignment of highly qualified and trained personnel to achieve Momentum Moval priorities, objectives, and initiatives.

FISCAL IMPACT
All position changes are consistent with appropriations previously approved by the City Council.

NOTIFICATION
162
ID: 26-0375 Page 2
Publication of the agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Drea Scholz Natalie Potter
Human Resources Division Manager Human Resources Director

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness: Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
163
ID: 26-0375 Page 3
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_HR_PERSONNEL CHANGES-OCTOBER 20 2026.docx
Attachments: - Attachment_Personnel Changes for Staff
Report_10.20.26_September.pdf
Final Approval Date: Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Natalie Potter
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
164
City of Moreno Valley
Personnel Changes - 9/1/26 – 9/30/26
October 20, 2026
New Hires
Christine Brown, Senior Engineer, P.E., Transportation Engineering Division, Public Works Department Alfredo Figueroa, Landscape Services Inspector, Parks and Landscape Services Division, Parks and Community Services Department
Ashra Mary Floria, Senior Accountant, Financial Operations Division, Financial and Management Services Department
Debbie Ivey, Senior Office Assistant, Building and Safety Division, Community Development Department Carla Lopez, Administrative Assistant, Planning Division, Community Development Department Jose Oropeza, Parks Maintenance Worker, Parks and Landscape Services Division, Parks and Community Services Department
Gerardo Rodriguez, Maintenance Worker II, Maintenance and Operations Division, Public Works Department
Esmeralda Torres, Management Assistant, Parks and Community Services Administration Division, Parks and Community Services Department
Jesse Wickizer, Maintenance Worker II, Maintenance and Operations Division, Public Works Department Promotions
Roy De Herrera
From: Leads Park Maintenance Worker, Parks and Landscape Services Division, Parks and Community Services Department
To: Traffic Signal Technician, Transportation Engineering Division, Public Works Department Transfers
Jailey Butler
From: Management Analyst, Human Resources Division, Human Resources Department To: Management Analyst, Electric Utility Division, Public Works Department 165
Separations
Carlos Delgado, Animal Control Officer, Animal Services Division, Community Development Department Joshua Thomas, Facilities Maintenance Worker, Fleet and Facilities Division, Public Works Department 166
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0393 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX

ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- BROOKLYN
BURGESS AT THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND
IRONWOOD AVE. (REPORT OF: PARKS AND
COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 2)
TITLE SUMMARY: Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Brooklyn Burgess At The Corner Of Perris Blvd.

And Ironwood Ave.

DISTRICT: District 2
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist's design; and

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council review and consider the Public Arts Commission's September 23, 2026, recommendation for the Utility Box Art Program application submitted by Brooklyn Burgess for the design of a utility box wrap located at the corner of Perris Blvd. and Ironwood Ave. The proposed artist compensation for the artwork currently under consideration is $500.

If approved, Parks & Community Services staff will proceed with implementation of the approved artwork in accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy and applicable City policies and procedures.

DISCUSSION
On June 20, 2023, the City Council approved the City of Moreno Valley’s Public Art Policy, which includes guidelines regarding the submittal process, selection criteria, installation, deinstallation, and agreements as it relates to the Public Art Program. It further considers the role of the Public Arts Commission and calls for the City Council to make the final decision on all public art on City of Moreno Valley property.

Per the approved Public Art Policy, “Public Art” is defined as artistic works created by artists that are unique and original, located in a public space or facility, and accessible to the public. Public Art includes works of a permanent or temporary nature. “Public Art” can take the form of an exhibit, performance, installation, integration of art and architecture, or a unique physical environment or feature that integrates art into the city. Eligible mediums include but are not limited to painting, mural, drawing, sculpture, photography, landscaping, water feature, components of a building, works of sound and/or light, and spoken word. Mass-produced or standardized art, mechanical reproductions, or directional signage are not eligible media.

In accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy, the proposed utility box artwork was reviewed by the Public Arts Commission at its meeting on September 23, 2026, and is now being presented to the City Council for final consideration.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation; or

2. Do not approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact associated with the utility box artwork presented for consideration under this item is $500. Funding for the Public Art Program will come from the ARTS Fund 4017.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of Agenda.
168
ID: 26-0393 Page 3

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Administration and Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred By: Concurred By:

Claudia Torres Jazmin Alvarez Barragan
Special Events & Facilities Division Manager Management Analyst

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Advocacy: Develop cooperative intergovernmental relationships and be a forceful advocate of City policies, objectives, and goals to appropriate external governments, agencies and corporations.

Community Image, Neighborhood Pride and Cleanliness: Promote a sense of community pride and foster an excellent image about our City by developing and executing programs which will result in quality development, enhanced neighborhood preservation efforts, including home rehabilitation and neighborhood restoration.

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
169
ID: 26-0393 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PCS_UTILITYBOX_102026_BURGESS.docx
Attachments: - Brooklyn Burgess Design.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
170
PROPOSED ART PROJECT:
"WILD & FREE"
171
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0394 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX

ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ZENESIA GUICE AT
THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND RED MAPLE LN.
(MORENO VALLEY LIBRARY IRIS PLAZA) (REPORT
OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT
4)
TITLE SUMMARY: Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Zenesia Guice At The Corner Of Perris Blvd.

And Red Maple Ln. (Moreno Valley Library Iris Plaza)
DISTRICT: District 4
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist's design; and

2. Review and consider the Public Arts Commission's recommendation to approve the Utility Box Art Program Application submitted by Zenesia Guice for the design of a utility 172
ID: 26-0394 Page 2
box wrap at the corner of Perris Blvd. and Red Maple Ln. (Moreno Valley Library Iris Plaza Branch).

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council review and consider the Public Arts Commission's September 23, 2026, recommendation for the Utility Box Art Program application submitted by Zenesa Guice for the design of a utility box wrap located at the corner of Perris Blvd. and Red Maple Ln. (Moreno Valley Library Iris Plaza Branch). The proposed artist compensation for the artwork currently under consideration is $400.

If approved, Parks & Community Services staff will proceed with implementation of the approved artwork in accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy and applicable City policies and procedures.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation; or

2. Do not approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact associated with the utility box artwork presented for consideration under this item is $400. Funding for the Public Art Program will come from the ARTS Fund 4017.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.
173
ID: 26-0394 Page 3

NOTIFICATION
Publication of Agenda.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Administration and Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred By: Concurred By:

Claudia Torres Jazmin Alvarez Barragan
Special Events & Facilities Division Manager Management Analyst

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
174
ID: 26-0394 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PCS_UTILITYBOX_102026_GUICE.docx
Attachments: - Zenesia Guice Design.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
175
Knowledge is Power
Proposed Art Project
176
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0392 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX
ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- HEATHER ANDREWSHORTON AT THE CORNER OF SUNNYMEAD BLVD.

AND HEACOCK ST. (REPORT OF: PARKS AND
COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 1)
TITLE SUMMARY: Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Heather Andrews-Horton At The Corner Of
Sunnymead Blvd. And Heacock St.

DISTRICT: District 1
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council review and consider the Public Arts Commission's September 23, 2026, recommendation for the Utility Box Art Program application submitted by Heather Andrews-Horton for the design of a utility box wrap located at the corner of Sunnymead Blvd. and Heacock St. The proposed artist compensation for the artwork currently under consideration is $500.

If approved, Parks & Community Services staff will proceed with implementation of the approved artwork in accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy and applicable City policies and procedures.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation; or

2. Do not approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact associated with the utility box artwork presented for consideration under this item is $500. Funding for the Public Art Program will come from the ARTS Fund 4017.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of Agenda.
178
ID: 26-0392 Page 3

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Administration and Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred By: Concurred By:

Claudia Torres Jazmin Alvarez Barragan
Special Events & Facilities Division Manager Management Analyst

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
179
ID: 26-0392 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PCS_UTILITYBOX_102026_HORTON.docx
Attachments: - Heather Andrews-Horton Design.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
180
181
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0391 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX

ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ASHLEY JETER AT
THE CORNER OF HEACOCK ST. AND HEMLOCK AVE.
(THE DISTRICT) (REPORT OF: PARKS AND
COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 1)
TITLE SUMMARY: Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Ashley Jeter At The Corner Of Heacock St. And Hemlock Ave. (The District)
DISTRICT: District 1
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council review and consider the Public Arts Commission's September 23, 2026, recommendation for the Utility Box Art Program application submitted by Ashley Jeter for the design of a utility box wrap located at the corner of Heacock St. and Hemlock Ave. (The District). Ashley Jeter is donating her design to the City of Moreno Valley.

If approved, Parks & Community Services staff will proceed with implementation of the approved artwork in accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy and applicable City policies and procedures.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation; or

2. Do not approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of this item, as the artist is donating her proposed utility box artwork design to the City at no cost.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of Agenda.
183
ID: 26-0391 Page 3

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Administration and Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred By: Concurred By:

Claudia Torres Jazmin Alvarez Barragan
Special Events & Facilities Division Manager Management Analyst

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
184
ID: 26-0391 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PCS_UTILITYBOX_102026_JETER.docx
Attachments: - Ashley Jeter Design.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
185
186
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0390 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX

ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ANDREW LYKO AT
THE CORNER OF EDGEMONT ST. AND EUCALYPTUS
AVE. (EDGEMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL) (REPORT
OF: PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 1)
TITLE SUMMARY: Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Andrew Lyko At The Corner Of Edgemont St.
and Eucalyptus Ave. (Edgemont Elementary School).

DISTRICT: District 1
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council review and consider the Public Arts Commission's September 23, 2026, recommendation for the Utility Box Art Program application submitted by Andrew Lyko for the design of a utility box wrap located at the corner of Edgemont St. and Eucalyptus Ave. (Edgemont Elementary School). The proposed artist compensation for the artwork currently under consideration is $500.

If approved, Parks & Community Services staff will proceed with implementation of the approved artwork in accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy and applicable City policies and procedures.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation; or

2. Do not approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact associated with the utility box artwork presented for consideration under this item is $500. Funding for the Public Art Program will come from the ARTS Fund 4017.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of Agenda.
188
ID: 26-0390 Page 3

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Administration and Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred By: Concurred By:

Claudia Torres Jazmin Alvarez Barragan
Special Events & Facilities Division Manager Management Analyst

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
189
ID: 26-0390 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PCS_UTILITYBOX_102026_LYKO.docx
Attachments: - Andrew Lyko Design.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
190
191
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0389 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX

ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- ALEXANDR SOKOLOV
AT THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND OLEANDER
AVE. (BEGINNING OF CITY LIMITS) (REPORT OF:

PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 4)
TITLE SUMMARY: Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Alexandr Sokolov At The Corner Of Perris Blvd.

And Oleander Ave. (Beginning of City Limits).

DISTRICT: District 4
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council review and consider the Public Arts Commission's September 23, 2026, recommendation for the Utility Box Art Program application submitted by Alexandr Sokolov for the design of a utility box wrap located at the intersection of Perris Blvd. and Oleander Ave. (Beginning of City Limits). The proposed artist compensation for the artwork currently under consideration is $500.

If approved, Parks & Community Services staff will proceed with implementation of the approved artwork in accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy and applicable City policies and procedures.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation; or

2. Do not approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact associated with the utility box artwork presented for consideration under this item is $500. Funding for the Public Art Program will come from the ARTS Fund 4017.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of Agenda.
193
ID: 26-0389 Page 3

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Administration and Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred By: Concurred By:

Claudia Torres Jazmin Alvarez Barragan
Special Events & Facilities Division Manager Management Analyst

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
194
ID: 26-0389 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PCS_UTILITYBOX_102026_SOKOLOV.docx
Attachments: - Alexandr Sokolov DesignFinal.pdf
Final Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
195
196
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0395 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
Mayor and City Council Acting in its Capacity as
President and Members of the Board of Directors of
the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD)
FROM: Jeremy Bubnick, Parks & Community Services
Director
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: REVIEW AND CONSIDER THE PUBLIC ARTS

COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR UTILITY BOX

ART PROGRAM APPLICATION- AIVAREE AGUILAR
SOKOLOVA AT THE CORNER OF PERRIS BLVD. AND
IRIS AVE. (JUAN BAUTISTA TRAIL) (REPORT OF: PARKS
AND COMMUNITY SERVICES) (DISTRICT 4)
TITLE SUMMARY: Request To Review And Consider The Public Arts Commission’s Recommendation For Utility Box Art Program Application- Aivaree Aguilar Sokolova At The Corner of
Perris Blvd. and Iris Ave. (Juan Bautista Trail).

DISTRICT: District 4
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council and Community Services District:

1. Receive and file the artist’s design; and

SUMMARY
This report recommends that the City Council review and consider the Public Arts Commission's September 23, 2026, recommendation for the Utility Box Art Program application submitted by Aivaree Aguilar Sokolova for the design of a utility box wrap located at the intersection of Perris Blvd. and Iris Ave. (Juan Bautista Trail). The proposed artist compensation for the artwork currently under consideration is $500.

If approved, Parks & Community Services staff will proceed with implementation of the approved artwork in accordance with the City’s Public Art Policy and applicable City policies and procedures.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation; or

2. Do not approve the Public Arts Commission’s recommendation

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact associated with the utility box artwork presented for consideration under this item is $500. Funding for the Public Art Program will come from the ARTS Fund 4017.

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

NOTIFICATION
Publication of Agenda.
198
ID: 26-0395 Page 3

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Melissa Cortes Jeremy Bubnick
PCS Administration and Financial Services Division Manager Parks & Community Services Director Concurred By: Concurred By:

Claudia Torres Jazmin Alvarez Barragan
Special Events & Facilities Division Manager Management Analyst

Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
199
ID: 26-0395 Page 4
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PCS_UTILITYBOX_102026_SOKOLOVA.docx
Attachments: - Aivaree Aguilar Sokolova Design.pdf
Final
Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Jeremy Bubnick
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
200
Proposed Art projects
“A Look into our Past”
Art featuring the various dinosaurs that once
roamed the Moreno Valley area, hidden beneath
where we stand today.
201
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0385 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Melissa Walker, Public Works Director/City Engineer AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT FOR THE SHERMAN

AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PER

CALIFORNIA STATE PUBLIC CONTRACT CODE
SECTION 22000 ET SEQ (REPORT OF: PUBLIC
WORKS) (DISTRICT 1)
TITLE SUMMARY: Construction Agreement Award To Hardy & Harper, Inc. For The Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community
Development Block Grant) Project Number 801 0119
DISTRICT: District 1
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council:

1. Find the Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community Development Block Grant) project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines pursuant to Section 15301(c) and Section 5.1.2 of the City’s Rules and Procedures for CEQA implementation;

2. Award a construction agreement to Hardy & Harper, Inc. for the Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements (Community Development Block Grant) Project Number 801 0119;

3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with Hardy & Harper, Inc. in the amount of $335,000.00, funded by the Community Development Block Grant Funds (Fund 2512);
202
ID: 26-0385 Page 2

4. Authorize the issuance of a purchase order to Hardy & Harper, Inc. in the amount of $402,000.00 (bid amount plus 20% contingency) once all parties have signed the agreement;

6. Approve an Amendment to the Adopted FY 2025/26 & 2026/27 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to incorporate the proposed project changes and associated budget adjustments.

SUMMARY
This staff report recommends awarding a construction agreement to Hardy & Harper, Inc. for the Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Project (Project No. 801 0119). The project is funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) (Fund 2512). The proposed improvements will enhance pedestrian safety and accessibility for residents and the public traveling along Sherman Avenue between Day Street and Pepper Street.

DISCUSSION
The Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Project will construct approximately 790 feet of missing sidewalk along the north side of Sherman Avenue, creating a continuous pedestrian connection from Day Street to Pepper Street. Supporting improvements include modifications to driveways, drainage facilities, curb and gutter, and access ramps to accommodate the new sidewalk and enhance pedestrian connectivity and accessibility.

Because the project’s location falls within the federal CDBG Program’s eligible Census Tract, the City can leverage CDBG funding for these improvements. These improvements will provide a continuous pedestrian connection and enhance accessibility along this segment of Sherman Avenue. Per California State Public Contract Code Section 22000 et seq., Public Works is limited in its ability to perform public project work using the City’s force account, which restricts such work to projects with an estimated value of $75,000 or less .

The design phase was completed in August 2026 by in-house engineering staff to reduce costs. The project was advertised for construction bids on August 21, 2026. Twelve (12) bids were received through the City’s electronic bid management system, PlanetBids, on September 15, 2026, as follows:

Contractors Bid Amount

1. Hardy & Harper, Inc. $335,000.00

2. LCR Earthwork & Engineering, Corp. $375,730.00

3. TVR Construction Engineering LLC $394,615.00

4. Baltazar Construction, Inc. $401,292.24
203
ID: 26-0385 Page 3

5. Universal Construction & Engineering $431,370.00

6. Onyx Paving Company Inc. $442,888.00

7. Vido Samarzich, Inc. $477,000.00

8. Greer’s Contracting & Concrete, Inc. $487,090.99

9. CT&C Concrete Paving, Inc. $492,402.55

10.Marin Concrete Construction, Inc. $495,300.00

11.Gentry General Engineering, Inc. $496,412.00

12.EBS General Engineering, Inc. $522,170.00
The lowest responsible bidder was determined by comparing the cumulative total for all bid items as stipulated in the bidding documents. Staff reviewed the bid from Hardy & Harper, Inc. and found it to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder in possession of a valid license and bid bond. Reference checks for the bidder revealed no outstanding issues. Therefore, staff recommends awarding an agreement to Hardy & Harper, Inc. in the amount of $335,000 and authorizing the issuance of a purchase order in the amount of $402,000.00, which includes the bid amount plus a 20% contingency for the construction of these much-needed street improvements. The contingency is recommended to account for latent or unforeseen circumstances that may arise during construction.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Community Development Department’s, Planning Division determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301(c) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and Section 5.1.2 of the City’s Rules and Procedures for the Implementation of CEQA.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report.

This alternative will provide for the timely construction of the Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements. Staff recommends this alternative.

2. Do not approve and authorize the recommended actions as presented in this staff report. Staff does not recommend this alternative, as it will delay the construction of much-needed improvements and may result in a loss of CDBG grant funding and higher future construction costs.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Sherman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements Project (801 0119) was awarded CDBG funding (Fund 2512) in FY 2025/26. The project has an available budget of $616,693.00. 204
ID: 26-0385 Page 4

AVAILABLE BUDGET
Community Development Block Grant (Fund 2512)
(Account 2512-70-77-80001-720199) (Project No. 801 0119-2512-99).... $616,693.00

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Construction (including 20% contingency) .................................................... $402,000.00 Geotechnical and Material Testing................................................................. $50,000.00 Project Administration, Inspection, and Labor Compliance ........................... $164,693.00 Estimated Construction Cost Total:............................................................... $616,693.00

ANTICIPATED PROJECT SCHEDULE
Construction is planned to start in Fall 2026, after all pre-construction documentation has been provided and approved by the City. The project is expected to finish in early Spring 2027, unless there are delays caused by weather or unforeseen site conditions.

NOTIFICATION
Prior to construction, business owners, schools, utilities, adjacent property owners, law enforcement, fire department, churches, public transportation, and other emergency service responders in the area will be notified in a timely manner of the proposed construction and roadway closures.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:

Andrew Palacios Melissa Walker, P.E.

Assistant Engineer Public Works Director/City Engineer
Concurred By: Concurred By:

Quang Nguyen, P.E. Harold Zamora, P.E.

Capital Projects Principal Engineer Engineering Division Manager/Assistant City Engineer

CITY COUNCIL GOALS
Positive Environment: Create a positive environment for the development of Moreno Valley's future.

Public Facilities and Capital Projects: Ensure that needed public facilities, roadway improvements, and other infrastructure improvements are constructed and maintained.

Public Safety: Provide a safe and secure environment for people and property in the community, control the number and severity of fire and hazardous material incidents, and provide protection for citizens who live, work and visit the City of Moreno Valley.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
205
ID: 26-0385 Page 5

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
206
ID: 26-0385 Page 6
Report Approval Details
Document
Title:

STAFFREPORT_PW_CP_SHERMAN_AVE_801_0119.docx
Attachments: - Location Map.pdf
- Draft Agreement_Hardy And Harper_Project No. 801 0119.pdf Final Approval
Date:

Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Melissa Walker
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
207
208
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-1
Agreement No.

AGREEMENT
PROJECT NO. 801 0119

SHERMAN AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
This Agreement (hereinafter, this “Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of _____________ 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Moreno Valley, a municipal corporation in the County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter referred to as the “City,” and Hardy & Harper, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Contractor.” That the City and the Contractor for the consideration hereinafter named, agree as follows:

1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The Contract Documents consist of the following, which are incorporated herein by this reference:

A. This Agreement
B. Any and all Contract Change Orders and Construction Change Directives issued after execution of this Agreement
C. Addenda Nos. 1 inclusive, issued prior to the Bid Deadline D. Federal Provisions and Requirements
E. Any Federal Certifications, documentation, and reports as required, including, but not limited to, Contractor’s Certification on Federal Contract Requirements, Certification of Nonsegregated Facilities, Certification of Equal Employment Opportunity, Certification on Good Faith Efforts Regarding Minority Based Enterprise (MBE) and Women Based Enterprise (WBE), Race and Ethnic Data Reporting Form F. City of Moreno Valley Supplementary General Conditions, if any G. The bound Contract Documents that includes City Special Provisions, General Provisions, and Technical Provisions
H. Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (“Greenbook”) – latest edition in effect at the Bid Deadline, as modified by the City Special Provisions I. Reference Specifications/Reference Documents other than those listed in paragraph 2, below
J. Project Plans
K. City Standard Plans
L. APWA Standards
M. Western Municipal Water Department Standard Plans
N. Governmental approvals, including, but not limited to, permits required for the Work O. Contractor’s Labor and Materials Payment Bond (for reference only) P. Contractor’s Faithful Performance Bond (for reference only) Q. Contractor’s Certificates of Insurance and Additional Insured Endorsements R. Contractor’s Bid Schedule, Bidder’s Proposal, Subcontractor List, and Material Supplier Listing
In the event of conflict between any of the Contract Documents, the provisions placing a more stringent requirement on the Contractor shall prevail. The Contractor shall provide the better 209
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-2
quality or greater quantity of Work and/or materials unless otherwise directed by City in writing.

In the event none of the Contract Documents place a more stringent requirement or greater burden on the Contractor, the controlling provision shall be that which is found in the document with higher precedence in accordance with the above order of precedence.

2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS. The following Reference Documents are not considered Contract Documents and are made available to the Contractor for informational purposes:

A. None

3. SCOPE OF WORK. The Contractor shall perform and provide all materials, tools, equipment, labor, and services necessary to complete the Work described in the Contract Documents, except as otherwise provided in the Plans, Standard Specifications, or City Special Provisions to be the responsibility of others.

4. PAYMENT.

4.1. Contract Price and Basis for Payment. In consideration for the Contractor’s full, complete, timely, and faithful performance of the Work required by the Contract Documents, the City shall pay Contractor for the actual quantity of Work required under the Bid Items awarded by the City performed in accordance with the lump sum prices and unit prices for Bid Items set forth the Bid Schedule submitted with the Bid. The sum of the unit prices and lump sum prices for the Base Bid Items awarded by the City is Three Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($335,000.00) (“Contract Price”). It is understood and agreed that the quantities set forth in the Bid Schedule for which unit prices are fixed are estimates only and that City will pay and Contractor will accept, as full payment for these items of Work, the unit prices set forth in the Bid Schedule multiplied by the actual number of units performed, constructed, or completed as directed and measured by the City Engineer.

4.2. Payment Procedures. The Contractor agrees that City payments will be received via Automated Clearing House (ACH) Direct Deposit and that the required ACH Authorization form will be completed prior to any payments by the City. Any invoice not paid because the completed ACH Authorization Form has not been provided will not incur any fees, late charges, or other penalties. The ACH Authorization Form is located at:
http://www.moval.org/city_hall/forms.shtml#bf
Based upon applications for payment submitted by the Contractor to the City, the City shall make payments to the Contractor in accordance with Section 7 of the Standard Specifications, as modified by Section 7 of the City Special Provisions.

5. CONTRACT TIME.

A. Contract Time. The Contract Time to complete the work in Forty-Five (45) working days.

B. Initial Notice to Proceed. After the Agreement has been fully executed by the Contractor and the City, the City shall issue the “Notice to Proceed” to Fulfill Preconstruction Requirements. The date specified in the Notice to Proceed to Fulfill Preconstruction Requirements 210
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-3
constitutes the date of commencement of the Contract Time of Forty-five (45) Working Days The Contract Time includes the time necessary to fulfill preconstruction requirements, place the order of materials, and to complete construction of the Project (except as adjusted by subsequent Change Orders).

The Notice to Proceed to Fulfill Preconstruction Requirements shall further specify that Contractor must complete the preconstruction requirements and order materials within Ten (10) Working Days after the date of commencement of the Contract Time; this duration is part of the Contract Time.

Preconstruction requirements include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Submitting and obtaining approval of Traffic Control Plans • Submitting and obtaining approval of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)/Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP)
• Submitting and obtaining approval of critical required submittals • Installation of the approved Project Identification Signs • Obtaining an approved no fee Encroachment Permit
• Obtaining a Temporary Use Permit for a construction yard • Notifying all agencies, utilities, residents, etc., as outlined in the Contract Documents If the City’s issuance of a Notice to Proceed to Fulfill Preconstruction Requirements is delayed due to Contractor’s failure to return the fully executed Agreement and insurance and bond documents within ten (10) Working Days after Contract award, then Contractor agrees to the deduction of one (1) Working Day from the number of days to complete the Project for every Working Day of delay in the City’s receipt of said documents. This right is in addition to and does not affect the City’s right to demand forfeiture of Contractor’s Bid Security if Contractor persistently delays in providing the required documentation.

C. Notice to Proceed with Construction. After all preconstruction requirements are met and materials have been ordered in accordance with the Notice to Proceed to Fulfill Preconstruction Requirements, the City shall issue the “Notice to Proceed with Construction,” at which time the Contractor shall diligently prosecute the Work, including corrective items of Work, day to day thereafter, within the remaining Contract Time.

6. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES AND CONTROL OF WORK.

6.1. Liquidated Damages. The Contractor and City (collectively, the “Parties”) have agreed to liquidate damages with respect to Contractor’s failure to complete the Work within the Contract Time, which includes the time necessary to fulfill preconstruction requirements, place the order of materials, and to complete construction of the Project (except as adjusted by subsequent Change Orders) in accordance with Article 5 above. The Parties intend for the liquidated damages set forth herein to apply to this Contract as set forth in Government Code Section 53069.85 and in Public Contract Code Section 7203. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the liquidated damages are intended to compensate the City solely for Contractor’s failure to meet the deadlines for completion of the Work and will not excuse Contractor from liability from any other breach, including any failure of the Work to conform to the requirements of the Contract Documents.
211
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-4
In the event that Contractor fails to complete the Work within the Contract Time, Contractor agrees to pay the City $1000 per Calendar Day that completion of the each such portion of the Work is delayed beyond the Contract Time. The Contractor will not be assessed liquidated damages for delays occasioned by the failure of the City or of the owner of a utility to provide for the removal or relocation of utility facilities.

The Contractor and City acknowledge and agree that the foregoing liquidated damages have been set based on an evaluation of damages that the City will incur in the event of late completion of portions of the Work. The Contractor and City acknowledge and agree that the amount of such damages are impossible to ascertain as of the date of execution hereof and have agreed to such liquidated damages to fix the City’s damages and to avoid later disputes. It is understood and agreed by Contractor that liquidated damages payable pursuant to this Agreement are not a penalty and that such amounts are not manifestly unreasonable under the circumstances existing as of the date of execution of this Agreement.

It is further mutually agreed that the City will have the right to deduct liquidated damages against progress payments or retainage and that the City will issue a Change Order or Construction Change Directive and reduce the Contract Price accordingly. In the event the remaining unpaid Contract Price is insufficient to cover the full amount of liquidated damages, Contractor shall pay the difference to the City.

Liquidated damages are owed automatically and without notice of any kind upon the accrual of each day of delay. City may at any time deduct liquidated damages as are payable hereunder from money due or to become due to Contractor, or pursue any other legal remedy to collect such liquidated damages from Contractor and/or its Surety. Neither the City's failure or delay in deducting liquidated damages from payments otherwise due Contractor, nor City's failure or delay in notifying Contractor of the accrual of liquidated damages, shall be deemed a waiver of City's right to liquidated damages.

City's rights under this Section shall not be interpreted as precluding or limiting: (1) any right or remedy of City arising from an event of Contractor default other than a failure to complete the Work within the Contract Time; or (2) City's right to order an acceleration, at Contractor's expense, of performance of the Work to overcome delay, including, without limitation, a delay for which City has the right to assess and/or accrue liquidated damages. The availability of liquidated damages shall not limit City's right to terminate the Contractor’s performance and accrual and/or assessment of liquidated damages does not constitute a waiver of such rights.

6.2. Owner is Exempt from Liability for Early Completion Delay Damages. While the Contractor may schedule completion of all of the Work, or portions thereof, earlier than the Contract Time, the Owner is exempt from liability for and the Contractor will not be entitled to an adjustment of the Contract Sum or to any additional costs, damages, including, but not limited to, claims for extended general conditions costs, home office overhead, jobsite overhead, and management or administrative costs, or compensation whatsoever, for use of float time or for Contractor’s inability to complete the Work earlier than the Contract Time for any reason whatsoever, including but not limited to, delay cause by Owner or other Excusable Compensable Delay. See Section 6-4 of the Standard Specifications and City Special Provisions regarding compensation for delays.
212
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-5

6.3. Any work completed by the Contractor after the issuance of a Stop Work Notice by the City shall be rejected and/or removed and replaced as specified in Section 3-5 of the City Special Provisions.

7. INSURANCE.

7.1. General. The Contractor shall procure and maintain at its sole expense and throughout the term of this Agreement, any extension thereof, Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Workers’ Compensation Insurance with such coverage limits as described herein.

7.2. Additional Insured Endorsements. The Contractor shall cause the insurance required by the Contract Document to include the City of Moreno Valley, the City Council and each member thereof, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the Moreno Valley Community Services District and their respective officials, employees, commission members, officers, directors, agents, employees, volunteers and representatives as an additional insureds. For the Commercial General Liability coverage, said parties shall be named as additional insureds utilizing either:

1. Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 10 (11/85); or

2. ISO Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 10 (10/01) and Additional Insured Completed Operations endorsement CG 20 37 (10/01); or

3. Substitute endorsements providing equivalent coverage, approved by the City.

The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to such additional insureds. Coverage for such additional insureds does not extend to liability to the extent prohibited by Insurance Code Section 11580.4.

7.3. Waivers of Subrogation. All policies of insurance required by the Contract Documents shall include or be endorsed to provide a waiver by the insurers of any rights of recovery or subrogation that the insurers may have at any time against the City of Moreno Valley, the City Council and each member thereof, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the Moreno Valley Community Services District and their respective officials, employees, commission members, officers, directors, agents, employees, volunteers, and representatives.

7.4. Primary Coverage. All policies and endorsements shall stipulate that the Contractor’s (and the Subcontractors’) insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Moreno Valley, the City Council and each member thereof, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority, and the Moreno Valley Community Services District and their respective officials, employees, commission members, officers, directors, agents, employees, volunteers, and representatives, and shall be excess of the Contractor’s (and its Subcontractors’) insurance and shall not contribute with it.

7.5. Coverage Applies Separately to Each Insured and Additional Insured.

Coverage shall state that the Contractor’s (and its Subcontractors’) insurance shall apply 213
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-6
separately to each insured or additional insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability. Coverage shall apply to any claim or suit brought by an additional insured against a named insured or other insured.

7.6. Self-Insurance. Any self-insurance (including deductibles or self-insured retention in excess of $50,000) in lieu of liability insurance must be declared by Contractor and approved by the City in writing prior to execution of the Agreement. The City’s approval of selfinsurance, if any, is within the City’s sole discretion and is subject to the following conditions:

1. Contractor must, at all times during the term of the Agreement and for a period of at least one (1) year after completion of the Project and any extension of the one-year correction guarantee period in accordance with Section 3-13.3 of the City Special Provisions, maintain and upon Owner’s reasonable request provide evidence of:
(a) Contractor’s “net worth” (defined as “total assets” [defined as all items of value owned by the Contractor including tangible items such as cash, land, personal property, and equipment, and intangible items such as copyrights and business goodwill]) minus total outside liabilities must be reflected in a financial statement for the prior fiscal year reflecting sufficient income and budget for Contractor to afford at least one loss in an amount equal to the amount of self-insurance;
(b) Financial statements showing that Contractor has funds set aside/budgeted to finance the self-insured fund (i.e., Contractor has a program that fulfills functions that a primary insurer would fill); and (c) A claims procedure that identifies how a claim is supposed to be tendered to reach the financing provided by the self-insured fund.

2. If at any time after such self-insurance has been approved, the Contractor fails to meet the financial thresholds or otherwise fails to comply with the provisions set forth in this Paragraph 7, at the option of the City:
(a) The Contractor shall immediately obtain and thereafter maintain the third party insurance required under this Paragraph 7 and otherwise on the terms required above; or
(b) The insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or selfinsured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers; or
(c) The Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation, claim administration, and defense expenses.
214
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-7

7.7. Insurer Financial Rating. Insurance companies providing insurance hereunder shall be rated A-VII or better in Best's Insurance Rating Guide and shall be legally licensed and qualified to conduct insurance business in the State of California.

7.8. Notices to City of Cancellation or Changes. Each insurance policy described in this Paragraph 7 shall contain a provision or be endorsed to state that coverage will not be cancelled without thirty (30) days’ prior written notice by certified or registered mail to the City (this obligation may be satisfied in the alternative by requiring such notice to be provided by Contractor’s insurance broker and set forth on its Certificate of Insurance provided to the City), except that cancellation for non-payment of premium shall require (10) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail. If an insurance carrier cancels any policy or elects not to renew any policy required to be maintained by Contractor pursuant to the Contract Documents, Contractor agrees to give written notice to the City at the address indicated on the first page of the Agreement. Contractor agrees to provide the same notice of cancellation and non-renewal to the City that is required by such policy(ies) to be provided to the First Named Insured under such policy(ies). Contractor shall provide confirmation that the required policies have been renewed not less than seven (7) days prior to the expiration of existing coverages and shall deliver renewal or replacement policies, certificates and endorsements to the City Clerk within fourteen (14) days of the expiration of existing coverages. Contractor agrees that upon receipt of any notice of cancellation or alteration of the policies, Contractor shall procure within five (5) days, other policies of insurance similar in all respects to the policy or policies to be cancelled or altered. Contractor shall furnish to the City Clerk copies of any endorsements that are subsequently issued amending coverage or limits within fourteen (14) days of the amendment.

7.9. Commercial General Liability. Coverage shall be written on an ISO Commercial General Liability “occurrence” form CG 00 01 (10/01 or later edition) or equivalent form approved by the City for coverage on an occurrence basis. The insurance shall cover liability, including, but not limited to, that arising from premises operations, stop gap liability, independent contractors, products-completed operations, personal injury, advertising injury, and liability assumed under an insured contract. The policy shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Project Endorsement ISO form CG 25 03 (11/85). Coverage shall contain no contractors’ limitation or other endorsement limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from pollution, explosion, collapse, or underground (x, c, u) property damage. Contractor shall provide Products/Completed Operations coverage to be maintained continuously for a minimum of one (1) year after Final Acceptance of the Work, and any extension of the one-year correction guarantee period in accordance with Section 3-13.3 of the City Special Provisions.

Contractor shall maintain Commercial General Liability insurance with the following minimum limits: $1,000,000 per occurrence / $2,000,000 aggregate / $2,000,000 products-completed operations.

7.10. Business Automobile Liability. Coverage shall be written on ISO form CA 00 01 (12/93 or later edition) or a substitute form providing equivalent coverage for owned, hired, leased and non-owned vehicles, whether scheduled or not, with $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage.
215
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-8

7.11. Workers’ Compensation. Contractor shall comply with the applicable sections of the California Labor Code concerning workers’ compensation for injuries on the job. Compliance is accomplished in one of the following manners:

1. Provide copy of permissive self-insurance certificate approved by the State of California; or

2. Secure and maintain in force a policy of workers’ compensation insurance with statutory limits and Employer’s Liability Insurance with a minimal limit of $1,000,000 per accident; or

3. Provide a “waiver” form certifying that no employees subject to the Labor Code’s Workers’ Compensation provision will be used in performance of this Contract.

7.12. Subcontractors’ Insurance. The Contractor shall include all Subcontractors as insureds under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each Subcontractor. All coverages for Subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.

8. BONDS. The Contractor shall provide two surety bonds. The Contractor shall furnish a satisfactory Performance Bond meeting all statutory requirements of the State of California on the form provided by the City. The bond shall be furnished as a guarantee of the faithful performance of the requirements of the Contract Documents as may be amended from time to time, including, but not limited to, liability for delays and damages (both direct and consequential) to the City and the City’s Separate Contractors and consultants, warranties, guarantees, and indemnity obligations, in an amount that shall remain equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract Price.

The Contractor shall furnish a separate satisfactory Labor and Materials Payment Bond meeting all statutory requirements of the State of California on the form provided by the City in an amount that shall remain equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract Price to secure payment of all claims, demands, stop payment notices, or charges of the State of California, of material suppliers, mechanics, or laborers employed by the Contractor or by any Subcontractor, or any person, form, or entity eligible to file a stop payment notice with respect to the Work.

All bonds shall be executed by a California-admitted surety insurer. Bonds issued by a Californiaadmitted surety insurer listed on the latest version of the U.S Department of Treasury Circular 570 shall be deemed accepted unless specifically rejected by the City. Bonds issued by sureties not listed in Treasury Circular 570 must be accompanied by all documents enumerated in California Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.660(a). The bonds shall bear the same date as the Contract. The attorney-in-fact who executes the required bonds on behalf of the surety shall affix thereto a certified and current copy of the power of attorney. In the event of changes that increase the Contract Price, the amount of each bond shall be deemed to increase and at all times remain equal to the Contract Price. The signatures shall be acknowledged by a notary public.

Every bond must display the surety’s bond number and incorporate the Contract for construction of the Work by reference. The terms of the bonds shall provide that the surety agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or modification of the Contract Documents or the Work to be performed thereunder shall in any way affect its obligations and shall waive notice of any such 216
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-9
change, extension of time, alteration, or modification of the Contract Documents. The surety further agrees that it is obligated under the bonds to any successor, grantee, or assignee of the City.

Upon the request of any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary of bonds covering payment of obligations arising under the Contract, the Contractor shall promptly furnish a copy of the bonds or shall authorize a copy to be furnished.

Should any bond become insufficient, or should any of the sureties, in the opinion of the City, become non-responsible or unacceptable, the Contractor shall, within ten (10) Calendar Days after receiving notice from the City, provide written documentation to the Satisfaction of the City that Contractor has secured new or additional sureties for the bonds; otherwise the Contractor shall be in default of the Contract. No further payments shall be deemed due or will be made under Contract until a new surety(ies) qualifies and is accepted by the City.

Contractor agrees that the Labor and Materials Payment Bond and Faithful Performance Bond attached to this Agreement are for reference purposes only, and shall not be considered a part of this Agreement. Contractor further agrees that said bonds are separate obligations of the Contractor and its Surety, and that any attorney’s fee provision contained in any payment bond or performance bond shall not apply to this Agreement. In the event there is any litigation between the parties arising from the breach of this Agreement, each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees in the litigation.

9. RECORDS. The Contractor and its Subcontractors shall maintain and keep books, payrolls, invoices of materials, and Project records current, and shall record all transactions pertaining to the Contract in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles. Said books and records shall be made available to the City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, the State of California, the Federal Government, and to any authorized representative thereof for purposes of audit and inspection at all reasonable times and places. All such books, payrolls, invoices of materials, and records shall be retained for at least five (5) years after Final Acceptance.

10. INDEMNIFICATION.

10.1. General. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor assumes liability for and agrees, at the Contractor’s sole cost and expense, to promptly and fully indemnify, protect, hold harmless and defend (even if the allegations are false, fraudulent, or groundless), the City of Moreno Valley, its City Council, the Moreno Valley Housing Authority (MVHA), and the Moreno Valley Community Services District (CSD), and all of their respective officials, officers, directors, employees, commission members, representatives and agents (“Indemnitees”), from and against any and all claims, allegations, actions, suits, arbitrations, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, or other legal proceeds, causes of action, demands, costs, judgments, liens, stop payment notices, penalties, liabilities, damages, losses, anticipated losses of revenues, and expenses (including, but not limited to, any fees of accountants, attorneys, experts or other professionals, or investigation expenses), or losses of any kind or nature whatsoever, whether actual, threatened or alleged, arising out of, resulting from, or in any way (either directly or indirectly), related to the Work, the Project or any breach of the Contract by Contractor or any of its officers, agents, employees, Subcontractors, Sub-subcontractors, or any person performing 217
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-10
any of the Work, pursuant to a direct or indirect contract with the Contractor (“Indemnity Claims”).

Such Indemnity Claims include, but are not limited to, claims for:

A. Any activity on or use of the City’s premises or facilities; B. Any liability incurred due to Contractor acting outside the scope of its authority pursuant to the Contract, whether or not caused in part by an Indemnified Party;
C. The failure of Contractor or the Work to comply with any Applicable Law, permit or orders;
D. Any misrepresentation, misstatement or omission with respect to any statement made in the Contract Documents or any document furnished by the Contractor in connection therewith;
E. Any breach of any duty, obligation or requirement under the Contract Documents, including, but not limited to any breach of Contractor’s warranties, representations or agreements set forth in the Contract Documents;
F. Any failure to coordinate the Work with City’s Separate Contractors; G. Any failure to provide notice to any party as required under the Contract Documents;
H. Any failure to act in such a manner as to protect the Project from loss, cost, expense or liability;
I. Bodily or personal injury, emotional injury, sickness or disease, or death at any time to any persons including without limitation employees of Contractor;
J. Damage or injury to real property or personal property, equipment and materials (including, but without limitation, property under the care and custody of the Contractor or the City) sustained by any person or persons (including, but not limited to, companies, corporations, utility company or property owner, Contractor and its employees or agents, and members of the general public);
K. Any liability imposed by Applicable Law including, but not limited to criminal or civil fines or penalties;
L. Any dangerous, hazardous, unsafe or defective condition of, in or on the Site, of any nature whatsoever, which may exist by reason of any act, omission, neglect, or any use or occupation of the Site by Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or Subcontractors;
M. Any operation conducted upon or any use or occupation of the Site by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or Subcontractors under or pursuant to the provisions of the Contract or otherwise; N. Any acts, errors, omission or negligence of Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or Subcontractors;
O. Infringement of any patent rights, licenses, copyrights, or intellectual property which may be brought against the Contractor or Owner arising out of Contractor’s Work, for which the Contractor is responsible; and P. Any and all claims against the City seeking compensation for labor performed or materials used or furnished to be used in the Work or alleged to have been furnished on the Project, including all incidental or consequential damages resulting to the City from such claims. 218
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-11

10.2. Effect of Indemnitees’ Active Negligence. Contractor’s obligations to indemnify and hold the Indemnitees harmless exclude only such portion of any Indemnity Claim which is attributable to the active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitee, provided such active negligence or willful misconduct is determined by agreement of the parties or by findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where an Indemnitee’s active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability for the Indemnity Claim involved, the obligation of Contractor will be for that entire percentage of liability for the Indemnity Claim not attributable to the active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitee(s). Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which would otherwise exist as to any party or person described in this Paragraph 10. Subject to the limits set forth herein, the Contractor, at its own expense, shall satisfy any resulting judgment that may be rendered against any Indemnitee resulting from an Indemnity Claim. The Indemnitees shall be consulted with regard to any proposed settlement.

10.3. Independent Defense Obligation. The duty of the Contractor to indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnitees includes the separate and independent duty to defend the Indemnitees, which duty arises immediately upon receipt by Contractor of the tender of any Indemnity Claim from an Indemnitee. The Contractor’s obligation to defend the Indemnitee(s) shall be at Contractor’s sole expense, and not be excused because of the Contractor’s inability to evaluate liability or because the Contractor evaluates liability and determines that the Contractor is not liable. This duty to defend shall apply whether or not an Indemnity Claim has merit or is meritless, or which involves claims or allegations that any or all of the Indemnitees were actively, passively, or concurrently negligent, or which otherwise asserts that the Indemnitees are responsible, in whole or in part, for any Indemnity Claim. The Contractor shall respond within thirty (30) Calendar Days to the tender of any Indemnity Claim for defense and/or indemnity by an Indemnitee, unless the Indemnitee agrees in writing to an extension of this time. The defense provided to the Indemnitees by Contractor shall be by well qualified, adequately insured and experienced legal counsel acceptable to the City.

10.4. Intent of Parties Regarding Scope of Indemnity. It is the intent of the parties that the Contractor and its Subcontractors of all tiers shall provide the Indemnitees with the broadest defense and indemnity permitted by Applicable Law. In the event that any of the defense, indemnity, or hold harmless provisions in the Contract Documents are found to be ambiguous or in conflict with one another, it is the parties’ intent that the broadest and most expansive interpretation in favor of providing defense and/or indemnity to the Indemnitees be given effect.

10.5. Waiver of Indemnity Rights Against Indemnitees. With respect to third party claims against the Contractor, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity against the Indemnitees.

10.6. Subcontractor Requirements. In addition to the requirements set forth hereinabove, Contractor shall ensure, by written subcontract agreement, that each of Contractor’s Subcontractors of every tier shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnitees with respect to Indemnity Claims arising out of, in connection with, or in any way related to each such Subcontractors’ Work on the Project in the same manner in which Contractor is required to protect, defend, indemnify and hold the Indemnitees harmless. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such defense and indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible to the Indemnitees according to the terms of this Paragraph 10. 219
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-12

10.7. No Limitation or Waiver of Rights. Contractor’s obligations under this Paragraph 10 are in addition to any other rights or remedies which the Indemnitees may have under the law or under the Contract Documents. Contractor’s indemnification and defense obligations set forth in this Paragraph 10 are separate and independent from the insurance provisions set forth in the Contract Documents, and do not limit, in any way, the applicability, scope, or obligations set forth in such insurance provisions. The purchase of insurance by the Contractor with respect to the obligations required herein shall in no event be construed as fulfillment or discharge of such obligations. In any and all claims against the Indemnitees by any employee of the Contractor, any Subcontractor, any supplier of the Contractor or Subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, the obligations under this Paragraph 10 shall not be limited in any way by any limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the Contractor or any Subcontractor or any supplier of either of them, under workers’ or workmen’s compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee benefit acts. Failure of the City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on the City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder.

10.8. Withholding to Secure Obligations. In the event an Indemnity Claim arises prior to final payment to Contractor, the City may, in its sole discretion, reserve, retain or apply any monies due Contractor for the purpose of resolving such Indemnity Claims; provided, however, the City may release such funds if the Contractor provides the City with reasonable assurances of protection of the Indemnitees’ interests. The City shall, in its sole discretion, determine whether such assurances are reasonable.

10.9. Survival of Indemnity Obligations. Contractor’s obligations under this Paragraph 10 are binding on Contractor’s and its Subcontractors’ successors, heirs, and assigns and shall survive the completion of the Work or termination of the Contractor’s performance of the Work.

11. FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. The Work under this Agreement is funded in whole or in part with federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds administered by HUD.

Accordingly, the Contractor and all Subcontractors shall comply with the following federal requirements:

11.1 The work to be performed under this contract is funded in whole or in part with federal funds. Accordingly, federal labor standards provisions including prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA) will be enforced. In the event of a conflict between Federal and State prevailing wage rates, the higher of the two will prevail.

11.2 The work to be performed under this contract is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended, 12 U.S.C. 1701u (Section 3). The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated by HUD assistance or HUD-assisted projects covered by Section 3, shall, to the greatest extent feasible, be directed to low- and very low-income persons, particularly persons who are recipients of government assistance for housing or residents of the community in which the Federal assistance is spent.
220
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-13

11.3 The parties to this contract agree to comply with HUD’s regulations in 24 CFR part 75, which implements Section 3. As evidenced by their execution of this contract, the parties to this contract certify that they are under no contractual or other impediment that would prevent them from complying with the part 75 regulations.

11.4 The contractor agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with which the contractor has a collective bargaining agreement or other understanding, if any, a notice advising the labor organization or workers’ representative of the contractor’s commitments under this Section 3 clause, and will post copies of the notice in conspicuous places at the work site where both employees and applicants for training and employment positions can see the notice. The notice shall describe the Section 3 preference and shall set forth the anticipated date the work shall begin, the qualifications for positions to be filled, and the name and location of the person(s) taking applications. The Contractor shall also track and report to the City all labor hours worked on the Project, including labor hours worked by Section 3 workers and Targeted Section 3 workers, in compliance with the benchmarks and reporting requirements of 24 CFR 75.19 and 75.25.

11.5 The contractor agrees to include this Section 3 Clause in every subcontract subject to compliance with regulations in 24 CFR part 75, and agrees to take appropriate action, as provided in an applicable provision of the subcontract or in this Section 3 Clause, upon a finding that the subcontractor is in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR part 75. The contractor will not subcontract with any subcontractor where the contractor has notice or knowledge that the subcontractor has been found in violation of the regulations in 24 CFR part 75.

11.6 The contractor will certify that any vacant employment positions, including training positions, that are filled (1) after the contractor is selected but before the contract is executed, and (2) with persons other than those to whom the regulations of 24 CFR part 75 require employment opportunities to be directed, were not filled to circumvent the contractor’s obligations under 24 CFR part 75.

11.7 Noncompliance with HUD’s regulations in 24 CFR part 75 may result in sanctions, termination of this contract for default, and debarment or suspension from future HUD assisted contracts.

11.8 Reserved.

11.9 Section 3 Compliance Clause. To the greatest extent feasible, the Contractor and subrecipients shall ensure that employment and training opportunities arising in connection with this project are provided to Section 3 workers residing within the area in which the project is located. Priority for these opportunities should be given to (i) Section 3 workers residing within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, and (ii) participants in YouthBuild programs Additionally, the Contractor shall ensure that contracts for work awarded in connection with this project are provided to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers residing within the area in which the project is located. Priority for these contracting opportunities should be given to (i) Section 3 business concerns that provide economic opportunities to Section 3 workers residing within the service area or the neighborhood of the project, and (ii) participants in YouthBuild programs. The Contractor agrees to comply with all applicable provisions of 24 CFR Part 75.19.
221
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-14

11.10 Copeland Anti-Kickback Act. The Contractor and its Subcontractors shall comply with the Copeland Anti-Kickback Act (18 U.S.C. 874; 40 U.S.C. 3145) and 29 CFR Part 3, and shall not induce any person employed on the Work to give up any compensation to which that person is entitled.

11.11 Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. The Contractor shall comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3701-3708), including payment of overtime at one and one-half times the basic rate for hours worked beyond forty (40) in a workweek.

11.12 Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act. The Contractor shall comply with all applicable standards and regulations under the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387), and shall report any violation to the City, the Federal awarding agency, and the EPA Regional Office.

11.13 Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment. The Contractor certifies that no Federal appropriated funds have been or will be used to influence any Federal officer or employee, Member of Congress, or congressional employee in connection with this Agreement; shall disclose any non-Federal lobbying as required; and shall include this certification in all subcontracts exceeding $100,000. (31 U.S.C. 1352.)

11.14 Debarment and Suspension. The Contractor certifies that neither it nor its principals are debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from this transaction by any Federal department or agency. (E.O. 12549; 2 CFR Parts 180 and 2424.)

12. THE BUILD AMERICA, BUY AMERICA ACT (BABA) To the extent the Buy America Preference applies to this Project under BABA (Sections 70901-70927 of Pub. L. No. 117-58), 2 CFR Part 184, and 2 CFR 200.322, the Contractor shall ensure that all iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials incorporated into the Work are produced in the United States as defined in those authorities, except to the extent covered by a waiver approved by HUD or the OMB Made in America Office. The Contractor shall include this requirement in all subcontracts and purchase orders for covered materials. The Contractor shall be solely responsible for compliance. All risk and cost of noncompliance, including removal and replacement of noncompliant materials and any funding deobligation resulting from the noncompliance, rest with the Contractor, in addition to any other remedies available under this Agreement..

13. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE AND FOR CONVENIENCE: Termination of this Agreement for cause and for convenience, including the manner by which termination is effected and the basis for settlement, is governed by Section 6-8 (Termination of the Contract for Cause and Convenience) of the General Provisions of the Contract Documents. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. The Parties bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns the covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall not, either voluntarily or by action of law, assign any right or obligation of the Contractor under the Contract Documents without prior written consent of the City. (SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
222
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
Addendum No. 1, August 25, 2025 Standard Form of Agreement 00500-15
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, a Municipal Corporation HARDY & HARPER, INC.

BY: License No./
City Manager Classification:

DATE: Expiration Date:

Federal I.D. No.:

PRINT NAME:

SIGNATURE:

TITLE:

DATE:

PRINT NAME:

SIGNATURE:

TITLE:

DATE:

SIGNING INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRACTOR:

Signature(s) must be accompanied by a completed notary certificate of acknowledgement attached hereto. A general partner must sign on behalf of a partnership. Two (2) corporate officers must sign on behalf of a corporation unless the corporation has a corporate resolution that allows one person to sign on behalf of the corporation; if applicable, said resolution must be attached hereto. The corporate seal may be affixed hereto.

INTERNAL USE ONLY
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM:

City Attorney
Date
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Public Works Director/City Engineer
Date
Chief Financial Officer / City Treasurer
Date
223
City of Moreno Valley
Project No. 801 0119
2246371.3
2246371.3

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE

CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
SAMPLE
County of ______________________
On _________________ before me, _____________________________________________________, (Here insert name and title of the officer)
personally appeared __________________________________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledgement to me that he/she they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
___________________________________ (Notary Seal)
Signature of Notary Public

ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM
Any acknowledgment completed in California must contain verbiage exactly appears above in the notary section or a separate acknowledgment form must property completed and attached to that document. The only exception is if a document is recorded outside of California. In such instances, any alternative acknowledgment verbiage as may be printed on such a document so long as the verbiage does not require the notary to do something that is illegal for a notary in California (i.e. certifying the authorized capacity of the signer).

Please check the document carefully for proper notarial wording and attach this form if required.
• State and County information must be the State and County where the document signer(s) personally appeared before the notary public for acknowledgment.
• Date of notarization must be the date that the signer(s) personally appeared which must also be the same date the acknowledgment is completed. • The notary public must print his or her name as it appears within his or her commission followed by a comma and then your title (notary public). • Print the name(s) of document signer(s) who personally appear at the time of notarization.
• Indicate the correct singular or plural forms by crossing off incorrect forms (i.e. he/she/they, is/are) or circling the correct forms. Failure to correctly indicate this information may lead to rejection of document recording. • The notary seal impression must be clear and photographically reproducible. Impression must not cover text or lines. If seal impression smudges, re-seal if a sufficient area permits, otherwise complete a different acknowledgment form.
• Signature of the notary public must match the signature on file with the office of the county clerk.
• Additional information is not required but could help to ensure this acknowledgment is not misused or attached to a different document. • Indicate title or type of attached document, number of pages and date. • Indicate the capacity claimed by the signer. If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer, indicate the title (i.e. CEO, CFO, Secretary). • Securely attach this document to the signed document.

DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT

AGREEMENT SIGNATURE PAGE
(Title or description of attached document)

___________________________________________
(Title or description of attached document continued)
Number of Pages _______
Document Date _______________
_____________________________________________
Additional Information

CAPACITY CLAIMED BY THE SIGNER
 Individual(s)
 Corporate Officer
_____________________________
(Title)
 Partner (s)
 Attorney-in-Fact
 Other __________________________________
224
Report to City Council
ID: 26-0405 Page 1
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Angelica Frausto-Lupo, Community Development
Director
Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
AGENDA DATE: October 20, 2026
TITLE: CIRCULATION ELEMENT AMENDMENT AND TRUCK
ROUTE ORDINANCE (PEN26-0058) (REPORT OF: CITY
ATTORNEY) (DISTRICT: ALL DISTRICTS)
TITLE SUMMARY: Circulation Element Amendment and Truck Route Ordinance (PEN26-0058)
DISTRICT: All Districts
Recommendation(s)
That the City Council, as recommended by the Planning Commission:

2. ADOPT Resolution No. 2026-XX approving an Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan pursuant to AB 98 and SB 415; and

3. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2026-XX approving a revised Truck Route Map and amending the Truck Route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal 225
ID: 26-0405 Page 2
Code, consistent with the Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

SUMMARY
On August 13, 2026, at a duly noticed Public Hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council introduce and adopt the attached Resolution and Ordinance approving an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan, revising the City's Truck Route Map, and amending the Truck Route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the City's amended Circulation Element and in compliance with pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

This Staff Report addresses the following items:

1. A determination that the Addendum 2 prepared for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Revised Program Environmental Impact Report (RFEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the Moreno Valley City Council on April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines, and constitutes sufficient and adequate CEQA review of the proposed Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026, and the proposed revised Truck Route Map and proposed amendments to the Truck Route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code;

2. A Resolution approving an Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan pursuant to AB 98 and SB 415; and

3. An Ordinance revising the City's Truck Route Map and amending the Truck Route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the proposed Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

DISCUSSION
Background
Planning Commission Recommendation
On August 13, 2026, at a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council: 1) determine that the Addendum prepared for the MoVal 2040 Revised Program Environmental Impact Report (RFEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the Moreno Valley City Council April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; 2) approve an amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan pursuant to AB 98 and SB 415; and 3) adopt an Ordinance revising the City's truck route map and amending the truck route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the City's amended Circulation Element and in compliance with 226
ID: 26-0405 Page 3
pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

Proposed Project
The Proposed Project consists of: (1) a proposed General Plan Amendment, as mandated by Assembly Bill 98 (AB 98) and Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), amending the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan, which includes revisions to the discussion, policies, actions and exhibits and corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element; and (2) a proposed Truck Route Ordinance containing revisions to the City’s Truck Routes Map and Truck Route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code consistent with the proposed Amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415.

AB 98 and SB 415
On September 29, 2024, AB 98 was signed into law by the Governor and requires jurisdictions within the State’s designated logistics warehouse concentration regions (which include the City of Moreno Valley) to update their General Plan Circulation Elements by January 1, 2026, to identify and establish designated truck routes for the movement of goods. AB 98 responds to the public health, environmental, and quality-of-life impacts stemming from the growth of logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 requires local jurisdictions to designate truck routes that prioritize the use of major arterials and highways, avoid sensitive land uses such as, but not limited to, homes, schools, and healthcare facilities, and include public signage and accessible mapping. AB 98 also imposes new development standards for logistics warehouse facilities, including setbacks, buffers, air-quality mitigation, and the use of zero-emission equipment. The intent of AB 98 is to create a more equitable and sustainable approach to goods movement associated with logistics warehouse facilities. In summary, AB 98 aims to reduce disproportionate burdens on vulnerable communities, promote cleaner industrial practices, and balance economic development with public health and environmental justice.

On October 3, 2025, the Governor signed SB 415 into law, which defines and clarifies various standards initially introduced in AB 98. For instance, SB 415 defines specific logistics warehouse development standards, truck route ordinance requirements, and environmental protection requirements, including those related to air quality and health impacts.

Although the City was required to update its General Plan Circulation Element by January 1, 2026, at the time AB 98 and SB 415 were signed into law, the City was in the process of preparing the necessary revisions to the prior Environmental Impact Report prepared for the prior 2021 MoVal 2040 General Plan (and related actions) in response to a Judgment and Writ issued by Riverside County Superior Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No.

CVRI2103300). During the course of preparing the necessary revisions, the City Attorney’s Office and City staff worked closely with the California Attorney General’s Office (“AGO”) on various mitigation measures related to the location, operation, and development standards associated with future logistics-type warehouses. In addition, the City Attorney’s Office kept the AGO informed of the City’s efforts related to revising the City’s Truck Route 227
ID: 26-0405 Page 4
Map consistent with the provisions of AB 98 and SB 415, and the community outreach/engagement activities and events organized, conducted, and/or performed by City staff as mandated by AB 98 and SB 415. All of the above proceeded with the understanding that the City was genuinely committed and acting in good faith with respect to ultimately approving the necessary amendments to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan as mandated by AB 98 and SB 415, albeit beyond the January 1, 2026, deadline.

MoVal 2040 Project
In June 2021 and August 2021, the City Council approved the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project which consisted of the 2021 MoVal 2040 General Plan (2021 GPU), 2021 Climate Action Plan (2021 CAP), and related 2021 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments (2021 Zoning Amendments), (collectively, the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project) and certified the 2021 Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2021 FEIR) prepared for 2021 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, the Sierra Club filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the Riverside County Superior Court (Case No.

CVRI2103300), challenging the City’s decision to certify the 2021 FEIR and approve the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project. Subsequently, the California Attorney General’s Office intervened in the case through the filing of a Petition for Writ of Mandate-in-Intervention.

In mid-2024, the City commenced the preparation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (consisting of the 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP, and 2024 Zoning Amendments) and the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project’s Revised Draft Program EIR (2024 RDEIR), to correct the deficiencies identified in the Writ, consistent with the Statement of Decision. On August 14, 2024, a public scoping meeting was held to solicit input from the public and interested agencies on the scope of the necessary environmental analysis for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project.

Following the scoping meeting, the 2024 RDEIR was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period, commencing July 7, 2025, through August 21, 2025, followed by a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley Planning Commission (Planning Commission) on October 9, 2025, to consider the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and the 2024 RDEIR. However, due to the receipt of a letter from the State of California Office of the Attorney General (AGO) on October 7, 2025, regarding the proposed 2024 CAP and the 2024 RDEIR’s various air quality issues and mitigation measures, the City Attorney recommended that the Planning Commission continue the October 9, 2025 Planning 228
ID: 26-0405 Page 5
Commission public hearing to provide staff sufficient time to respond to the various issues and mitigation measures raised by the AGO. As such, the Planning Commission continued the October 9, 2025, Planning Commission public hearing to the Planning Commission’s regular meeting, scheduled for October 23, 2025. At the duly noticed October 23, 2025 public hearing, after hearing a staff report, receiving public testimony and engaging in deliberation, the Planning Commission voted to: (a) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project.

Thereafter, at a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley City Council, held on April 21, 2026, the City Council voted to adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (PEN25-0020).

9.05 (Industrial Districts) of Title 9 (Planning And Zoning) to add Section 9.05.060 (Logistics Use Facilities Mitigation Measures)” (AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance).

The proposed ordinance containing the negotiated mitigation measures was reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 25, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, at which the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt, which the City Council subsequently adopted on September 1, 2026.

Community Outreach/Engagement
As part of its effort to inform the general community (via community outreach/engagement) of the proposed changes to the City’s designated truck route network and to solicit input about the changes, the City created an “interactive” landing page on its website at AB 98/SB 415 Truck Routes | Public Works | City of Moreno Valley titled “AB 98 / SB 415 Truck Routes in Moreno Valley.” The public was informed 229
ID: 26-0405 Page 6
that AB 98/SB 415 set new statewide rules for large warehouse and logistics facilities to better protect nearby communities, with an aim to reduce truck traffic, air pollution, noise, and bright lighting—especially near sensitive receptors such as homes, schools, and parks. The public was further informed that under these new laws, large warehouses must follow improved standards for location, design, and truck routing, include buffers to limit impacts on neighbors, and, in some cases, replace housing if it is displaced by warehouse development. In addition, the public was provided with an interactive GIS map called “Proposed AB 98 and SB 415 Truck Route Map.” This allowed the public to remotely view existing truck routes and potential changes or download a printable static map in a PDF format. Basically, the map allows the public to view the current truck route network and the proposed truck route network.

The truck route landing page also included a list of “Frequently Asked Questions” and responses prepared by City staff. The Frequently Asked Questions included:
 What is AB 98?
 What is a sensitive receptor?
 What is the warehouse concentrated region?
 What is a truck route?
 What does the City have to do for truck routes?
 Will this change where trucks park and stop?
 How do truck routes affect the community?
 How were the routes chosen?
 What is the mandatory use for truck routes?
In addition to the above Frequently Asked Questions, the truck route landing page included questions asked in the context of several public outreach meetings and answers prepared by City staff. Below is a sample of some of the questions and answers posted on the landing page:
 Has the City coordinated truck route removals with neighboring cities, such as Redlands and Perris?
Yes. The City is coordinating with nearby cities and Riverside County to make sure truck routes connect smoothly across city boundaries.  Can trucks still travel on streets that are not designated truck routes? Yes, for certain reasons. Federal law allows trucks to use non-truck routes if they are making a delivery or need to reach a specific destination. State law 230
ID: 26-0405 Page 7
also requires that trucks be able to deviate from assigned truck routes when doing so is necessary to make a delivery.
 Will the City install new signage for truck routes?
Yes. The City will install signs identifying the designated truck routes. Both AB 98 and SB 415 require signs to be installed at all heavy-duty truck exit driveways directing truck drivers to designated truck routes and to the state highway system, which includes Interstate 215 and State Route 60. Both AB 98 and SB 415 also require the City to post conspicuous signage to identify truck routes, and to make truck routes publicly available in a Geographic Information System (GIS) format, and to share the GIS maps of the truck routes with warehouse operators, fleet operators, and truck drivers.  Will truck parking and idling regulations change?
The Moreno Valley Municipal Code currently prohibits trucks and other vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or more from parking: a) on any highway, street, road, alley or private property within any residential district within the City; b) on any vacant lot or unimproved nonresidential property in the City; c) on any nonresidential property so that any part of such vehicle is within 100 feet of any human dwelling; d) within 150 feet of any driveway opening; e) within any commercially zoned property for the purpose other than doing business at the site; f) on any nonresidential property so that any part of such vehicle is within 15 feet of the property line, a public sidewalk, or of a public or private roadway edge; g) on any alley within the City; and h) on any highway, street or road which is adjacent to a parcel upon which there exists a public facility, which includes parks and schools. Moreover, both AB 98 and SB 415, require the City to provide signage for truck parking. In addition, AB 98 and SB 415 require that logistics use developments submit a Truck Routing Plan to the Planning Division for its review and approval, prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy. The Truck Routing Plan must include a queueing analysis for preventing truck parking on public streets. In addition, whenever a new tenant moves into an existing logistic use development, a revised Truck Routing Plan must be submitted to the Planning Division for its review and approval, prior to the issuance of a business license. Upon such review, the Planning Division is authorized to determine if changes to the Truck Routing Plan are necessary, such as adding measures to alleviate any parking issues that may arise during the life of the logistics use development.

With respect to idling, the Moreno Valley Municipal Code provides that while adjacent to a developed residential area within the City, trucks and other vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or more are prohibited from idling for longer than five minutes. However, both AB 98 and SB 415 prohibit idling of heavyduty truck engines for more than 3 minutes at a logistics use development and require that signs regarding the 3-minute restriction be posted at logistics use developments along entrances to the site and at the truck loading bays.

Signs are also required to be posted identifying any appropriate idling facility locations – if any. AB 98 and SB 415 also prohibit idling while powering 231
ID: 26-0405 Page 8
climate control equipment if the truck is capable of plugging in at a loading bay. In light of the foregoing, staff may be recommending that the five-minute idling restriction set forth in the Municipal Code be revised to 3 minutes to be consistent with AB 98 and SB 415’s on-site idling restrictions.  What changes are proposed to the truck route map, and how do they reduce impacts near homes, schools and parks?
The proposed changes to the City’s current truck routes are depicted on the interactive map located at: moval.org/truck routes. The proposed changes were guided by the provisions of AB 98 and SB 415, as described below. AB 98 and SB 415 mandate that City update the Circulation Element of the City’s General Plan to: a) Identify and establish specific travel routes for the transport of goods, materials, or freight for storage, transfer, or redistribution to safely accommodate additional truck traffic and avoid residential areas and sensitive receptors; and b) Maximize the use of interstate or state divided highways as preferred routes for truck routes. AB 98 and SB 415 further provide that major or minor collector streets and local roads that predominantly serve commercial or industrial uses shall be used for truck routes only when strictly necessary to reach existing industrial zones and that trucks be routed via transportation arteries that minimize exposure to sensitive receptors. “Sensitive receptors” include the following: a) residence, including, but not limited to, a private home, apartment, condominium unit, group home, dormitory unit, or retirement home; b) a school, including, but not limited to, a preschool, prekindergarten, or school maintaining kindergarten or any of grades 1 to 12, inclusive; c) daycare facility, including, but not limited to, in-home daycare; d) publicly owned parks, playgrounds, and recreational areas or facilities primarily used by children; e) nursing homes, long-term care facilities, hospices, convalescent facilities, or similar live-in housing; and f) hospitals.
 How is the City of Moreno Valley balancing truck access with protecting neighborhoods and other sensitive areas?
The City reviews truck traffic volumes, nearby land uses, and road design to ensure trucks can reach destinations while minimizing impacts on sensitive receptors, such as homes, schools, parks, medical facilities, etc. This approach is guided by AB 98 and SB 415, which require cities to minimize truck exposure to sensitive receptors while still maintaining efficient goods movement.
 How will the City of Moreno Valley notify Caltrans, trucking companies, and GPS providers about truck route changes?
The City will communicate the approved truck routes with relevant agencies and stakeholders so navigation systems and trucking operations can update their routing information. AB 98 and SB 415 both require the City to make 232
ID: 26-0405 Page 9
truck route maps publicly available in GIS format and to share those maps with warehouse operators, fleet operators, and truck drivers.  What signage will be removed or installed, and where will it be placed? Signs will be removed from streets that are no longer truck routes. New directional or “No Truck” signs will be installed where needed to guide drivers.

The Moreno Valley Municipal Code requires that the City label truck routes with conspicuous signs erected at all entrances to truck routes. Further, the Municipal Code also requires the City to erect conspicuous signs at entrances of streets where trucks are prohibited. This signage work is required by AB 98 and SB 415, which direct cities to clearly identify truck routes and install directional signage to guide trucks to approved routes.  How will SB 415 truck idling rules be implemented and enforced? SB 415, building on AB 98, requires a three-minute idling limit at logistics use developments and specifies that signage must be posted at entrances and loading bays, with enforcement handled consistent with local authority. The City will handle signage in the public right-of-way, while private property signage is the responsibility of the property owner. Violations of the threeminute idling limit would subject the violator to a misdemeanor citation.  What is the enforcement plan for truck route, parking, and idling violations? The Moreno Valley Police Department and the City’s Code Compliance Officers will enforce violations based on the type of violation and where the violation occurs. SB 415 requires the City to have at least one CHP trained enforcement officer for purposes of truck route enforcement. The City currently has two CHP-trained officers. The City has not yet determined how many deputies will be needed for enforcement of the City’s truck routes ordinance, which is a decision that the City may consider at any time in the future if more officers become necessary.
 When will new truck route signs be installed?
Signs will be installed or removed after the proposed truck route map is officially approved. AB 98 and SB 415 require signage to be installed once truck routes are formally adopted and incorporated into the City’s circulation planning.

The truck route landing page also listed contact information for any additional comments and questions.

The City also engaged the community on the truck route issue in the context of the following community events.
233
ID: 26-0405 Page 10
Neighborhood Outreach November 25th, 2025 Moreno Valley Mall (Food Court)
Neighborhood Outreach November 25th, 2025 City Library
(Alessandro Bl. at
Kitching St.)
Traffic Safety
Commission
December 3rd, 2025 City Hall Council
Chamber
Stakeholders Meeting December 11th, 2025 City Hall Public Works Department
Val Verde School District December 16th, 2025 Virtual Meeting Traffic Safety
Commission
January 7th, 2026 City Hall Council
Chamber
Traffic Safety
Commission
February 4th, 2026 at
6pm
City Hall Council
Chamber
Planning Commission
(Receive and File
presentation only)
February 12, 2026 at
6 PM
City Hall Council
Chamber
AB 98 and SB 415
Workshop
March 4th, 2026 at
6pm
City Hall Council
Chamber
Community
Development
Community Outreach
Meeting
(Logistics Facilities
Mitigation)
May 13th, 2026 at
6pm - 8pm
Palm Middle School
(Library)
City staff also met with representatives of the Moreno Valley School District and Val Verde School District to provide detailed information regarding the proposed revisions to the City’s truck route network, and the City’s Assistant City Engineer presented the issue to the Board of Trustees of the Moreno Valley School District at its regular Board meeting in July 2026, and the Board of Trustees of the Val Verde School District at its regular Board meeting in October 2026. Moreover, on February 21, 2026, the City Attorney attended a Summit organized by the Freight Community Action Coalition and the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice and provided a presentation on the City’s proposed revisions to 234
ID: 26-0405 Page 11
its truck route network, which included fielding numerous questions from the Summit’s attendees.

The City reached out to the following stakeholders, informing them of the City’s efforts to revise its truck route network in accordance with AB 98 and SB 415, and providing a link to the City’s truck route landing page on the City’s website for additional information.  Moreno Valley Unified School District
 Val Verde Unified School District
 Moreno Valley Chamber of Commerce
 Moreno Valley Hispanic Chamber of Commerce
 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians
 Cabazon Band of Cahuilla Indians
 Morongo Band of Mission Indians
 Pechanga Band of Mission Indians
 Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians
 Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians
 Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation
Circulation Element Amendment
The proposed Amendment satisfies the statutory requirements for the General Plan Circulation Element and provides a circulation diagram identifying major thoroughfares; transportation routes for vehicles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians; and also, a Joint Use base/airport. The Amendment also includes policies for “complete streets,” which provide a balanced, multimodal transportation network serving all users and abilities and support other chapters of the General Plan by providing and enhancing multimodal transportation options and supporting adjacent land uses. The Amendment also indicates that the City will require new logistics warehouse developments to prepare truck routing plans consistent with the designated truck routes network, which will be subject to periodic review for any necessary updates to respond to land use changes, community concerns, and evolving goods movement patterns.

The proposed Amendment would also revise the policies and actions that support Goal C6 of the Circulation Element, which directs the City to provide for safe, efficient goods movement by road, air, and rail. The following new actions are set forth in the Amendment to support Goal C-6:
 Maintain and regularly update a publicly accessible Truck Route Map, including GIS data, to clearly identify designated routes and support enforcement and coordination with regional agencies;
 Require new logistics warehouse developments to be located and designed to minimize reliance on local streets and avoid creating new truck traffic conflicts with sensitive receptors; and
 Coordinate with Caltrans, neighboring jurisdictions, and regional agencies to 235
ID: 26-0405 Page 12
align truck routes and minimize the need for trucks servicing logistics warehouse developments to use non-designated local streets.

Additionally, the proposed Amendment revises existing actions outlined in the Circulation Element to maintain internal consistency amongst the other proposed revisions to the Circulation Element, which further define actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided. Together, these revisions incorporate the development and siting standards required by AB 98 and SB 415 and are consistent with the air quality-related mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO. As such, the following actions are included to support Goal C-6:
 Avoid routing truck traffic through or adjacent to sensitive land uses to the extent feasible; where avoidance is not feasible due to existing conditions, implement mitigation measures such as buffering, signage, and operational controls; and  Continue to require all new or expanded logistics warehouse developments to comply with the air quality-related mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.

Truck Route Ordinance
The Truck Route Ordinance includes a newly revised truck route map.

The City’s existing truck routes are shown on Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 feet, as found within the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR. This figure shows areas of potential conflict where sensitive receptors, as defined in AB 98 and SB 415 (e.g., schools, parks, care facilities, and residential areas), are located within 1,000 feet of an existing truck route. As shown in Figure 2, SR-60 and I-215 are part of the federally designated National Network Route. The key segments of the City’s existing truck routes are Perris Boulevard, Alessandro Boulevard, Frederick Street, and Heacock Street, which carry some of the highest truck volumes in the City, with daily truck traffic exceeding approximately 1,300 to 1,600 trucks. Perris Boulevard and Heacock Street, particularly north of Alessandro Boulevard, function as key north–south connectors. These segments pass through established residential neighborhoods and areas with a concentration of schools and community facilities, which are considered sensitive receptors. Alessandro Boulevard, which serves as a major east–west corridor, is largely commercial in character; however, segments, particularly east of Heacock Street, interface with residential uses and schools. Frederick Street and portions of Redlands Boulevard exhibit a similar pattern, where commercial uses are interspersed with residential neighborhoods, increasing the potential for conflicts with sensitive receptors.

The proposed truck route revises the City’s truck routes network as shown on Figure 3:

Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet, as found within the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR. The existing truck routes that will be eliminated as officially designated truck routes from the proposed truck route network are shown in Figure 4, Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated, as found within the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR.

As shown in Figures 3 and 4, with the elimination of a multitude of existing truck routes, the realignment of others, and the addition of segments of Eucalyptus Avenue east of Redlands 236
ID: 26-0405 Page 13
Boulevard and Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60, the proposed truck routes network would reduce truck travel activity on local streets and nearby sensitive receptors and shift freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR-60 and I-215 while prioritizing access to industrial areas that permit logistics warehouse facilities. The proposed truck routes network, as shown in Figure 3, is mainly limited to the portions of Alessandro Boulevard, Cactus Avenue, Perris Boulevard, and several future interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses.

Moreover, truck routes in adjacent jurisdictions may not align with the Proposed Project’s truck route network; however, in such cases (as discussed below), trucks are permitted to utilize non-designated local streets within the City to access the nearest designated truck route. In addition, trucks serving local commercial and industrial uses will continue to use the most direct routes where necessary, as designated alternative routes may not provide feasible access to final destinations. California Vehicle Code § 35703 mandates that no city may adopt a truck route ordinance that prohibits "any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained." Moreover, 49 USCS § 31114(a) prohibits any laws that deny certain commercial motor vehicles reasonable access between certain interstate highways and other qualifying highways and certain facilities for food, fuel, repairs, and rest, and points of loading and unloading for household goods, etc.

Heacock Street
Some community members have requested that the City remove a half-mile segment of the northbound lanes of Heacock Street between Cactus Avenue and Alessandro Boulevard as a designated truck route, while maintaining the southbound lanes as a designated truck route. After reviewing and studying this request, City staff recommends keeping both directions of Heacock Street along this half-mile segment as designated truck routes for the reasons discussed below.

AB 98 and SB 415 requires that truck routes first maximize the use of interstate and state divided highways, and then arterial roads and major thoroughfares when state or interstate highways cannot be utilized. In summary, under AB 98/SB 415, truck routes must be designed to keep trucks on main roads and away from sensitive receptors, such as residential areas, whenever feasible.
237
ID: 26-0405 Page 14
The realignment of the City’s current truck route network, as mandated by AB 98/SB 415, presents many challenges for the City, considering the geography of the City’s current built environment and its proximity to a single interstate (Interstate 215) and a single state divided highway (State Route 60). Consistent with AB 98/SB 415, the City’s proposed truck routes realignment, as in the past, maximizes the use of Interstate 215 and State Route 60 as the City’s primary truck routes. However, due to the unprecedented demand for the rapid development of logistics infrastructure to immediately accommodate the monumental shift in global and local on-line purchasing, past land use approvals have placed a significant number of logistics warehouses in areas which contained large vacant and developable parcels in areas of the City which connect to Interstate 215 and/or State Route 60 via the use of arterial roads and major thoroughfares, such as Alessandro Boulevard, Perris Boulevard and Heacock Street.

Although the City acknowledges that a certain segment of the northbound lanes of Heacock Street is situated adjacent to a sensitive receptor (residential development), City staff believes it is necessary to maintain both directions of Heacock Street as a designated truck route since Interstate 215 and State Route 60, are not feasible alternatives to this section of Heacock Street, because many of the City’s approved logistics warehouse facilities (which have relied on the use of Heacock Street as a designated truck route) are situated within the interior of the City rather than adjacent to Interstate 215 or State Route 60.

Moreover, rerouting trucks and/or building bypasses along this segment of Heacock Street to avoid passing by the adjacent sensitive receptor would be extremely difficult from a traffic circulation perspective, due to limited right-of-way and lack of viable alternative routes.

Moreover, City staff has opined that removing the subject northbound lanes of Heacock Street as a designated truck route would not reduce the number of trucks in the area; rather, it would only change where the trucks will travel. For instance, every northbound truck would be forced to turn left at the intersection of Heacock Street and Cactus Avenue instead, which would create the following impacts:
 Longer lines. Since heavy-duty trucks are slow to turn, sending all of them through one left turn would cause backups at the subject intersection and limit the number of trucks that could make it through each signal phase, which will create not only traffic safety hazards, but also put pedestrians at risk crossing this busy intersection.
 More pollution. Trucks waiting in line to make the necessary left turn will sit idling, is a major source of air pollution; in other words, the requested change would increase pollution at and near the intersection of Heacock Street and Cactus Avenue instead of reducing it.
 Confusing rules. A truck route that works in only one direction is challenging for truck drivers to follow, which would create traffic safety hazards, in addition to being challenging for the City to enforce.

Although Staff shares the goal of reducing truck pollution near homes, Staff recommends that keeping the subject half-mile segment of Heacock Street a designated truck route is the more prudent way to meet that goal.
238
ID: 26-0405 Page 15
Notwithstanding the above, the City will have the opportunity to ensure that future (if any) logistic warehouse developments in areas connected to Interstate 215 or State Route 60 via the use of Heacock Street do not create any unmitigable impacts of heavy-duty truck traffic along this segment of Heacock Street on the existing adjacent residential development. This will be accomplished via the City’s review and approval of truck route plans submitted to the City by future logistics warehouse facility operators. AB 98 and SB 415 mandates that a logistics warehouse facility operator, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, establish and submit for approval by the City, a truck routing plan to and from the state highway system based on the City’s latest truck route map. The purpose of such a plan is to determine whether any truck route revisions may be necessary due to specified circumstances, which could include potential additional impacts on adjacent sensitive receptors along this segment of Heacock Street. In addition, residents along this segment of Heacock Street will be eligible, simply due to the location of their residence along a designated truck route, for funding from the contemplated Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) and Air Filtration Abatement Fund, to purchase an affixed permanent air filtration system and/or HVAC systems with a SEER rating of at least 19 with a 10-year maintenance agreement.

REVIEW PROCESS
As part of the standard review process, the Ordinance and Matrix were circulated and reviewed by all appropriate City Departments and Divisions. Following staff review, City staff have confirmed that the Ordinance is consistent with the applicable Municipal Code findings described below.

Pursuant to 9.02.050 (Amendments to zoning districts or other provisions of Title 9) of Chapter 9.02 (Permits and Approvals) of Title 9 (Planning and Zoning) of the Municipal Code, amendments to Title 9, including amendments to the zoning atlas, may be made if:

1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the general plan and its goals, objectives, policies, and programs, and with any applicable specific plan;

2. The proposed amendment will not adversely affect public health, safety or general welfare;

3. The proposed amendment is consistent with the purposes and intent of Title 9; and

4. The proposed amendment will provide public benefits to the general community beyond those that may be unilaterally imposed by the city through the traditional exaction process, which will enhance public safety services, promote public health, increase recreational opportunities, and improve general community services for children.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The Addendum analyzes potential impacts of the Proposed Project as compared to impacts identified and evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR.
239
ID: 26-0405 Page 16
As Lead Agency, the City is required to review and consider whether the Proposed Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those previously disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated in the 2024 RFEIR. Basically, additional CEQA review would be triggered only if the Proposed Project would result in new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those disclosed, analyzed, and mitigated in the 2024 RFEIR. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that an addendum is the appropriate CEQA document for a project if the lead agency finds that major revisions to a prior certified environmental impact report are not necessary and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or Supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered.

As detailed in the attached Addendum, the Proposed Project would not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR. As demonstrated in the Addendum, the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, the Addendum to the previously certified 2024 RFEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Approve the Circulation Element, revised Truck Route Map and amend Municipal Code regarding Truck Routes to comply with state law. Staff prefers this alternative.

2. Do not approve the Circulation Element, revised Truck Route Map and amend Municipal Code regarding Truck Routes. Staff does not recommend this alternative as the Circulation Element and Truck Route will not be in compliance with the substantive provisions of AB 98 and SB 415, which could subject the City to fines imposed by the California Attorney General’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT
No fiscal impacts are anticipated from the approval and adoption of the proposed Ordinance. However, it is anticipated that the proposed modifications will successfully address industrial regulations, which are expected to positively impact development and yield a positive fiscal impact for the City.

NOTIFICATION
Since the provisions of the Proposed Project will apply citywide, the notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Press-Enterprise Newspaper on August 21, 2026.

PREPARATION OF STAFF REPORT
Prepared By: Department Head Approval:
240
ID: 26-0405 Page 17
Claudia Manrique Steven B. Quintanilla
Associate Planner City Attorney
Concurred By:

Sergio Madera Angelica Frausto-Lupo
Planning Division Manager Community Development Director

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PRIORITIES

1. Economic Development

2. Public Safety

3. Library

4. Infrastructure

5. Beautification, Community Engagement, and Quality of Life

6. Youth Programs
241
ID: 26-0405 Page 18
Report Approval Details
Document Title: STAFFREPORT_CDD_PEN26-
0058_CIRCULATION_ELEMENT.docx
Attachments: - Resolution 2026-XX_CEQA.docx
- Attachment to Resolution 2026-XX CEQA_Addendum.pdf
- Resolution 2026-XX_Circulation Element Amendment.docx - Ordinance No. XX_MCA.doc
- Official MV Truck Routes Map.pdf
Final Approval Date: Oct 15, 2026
This report and all of its attachments were approved and signed as outlined below:

Angelica Frausto-Lupo
Sean Kelleher
Anna Chacon
Felicia London, MPA
Launa Jimenez
Brian Mohan
Patty Rodriguez
242
1 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: October 20, 2026
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO

VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN ADDENDUM TO THE

REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CERTIFIED FOR THE 2024 MOVAL 2040 PROJECT, CONSISTING OF THE 2024
MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, 2024 ASSOCIATED
ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 9 (PLANNING & ZONING) AND ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS, AND 2024 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Moreno Valley ("City") is a general law city and municipal corporation of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, in April and May of 2026, the City Council took the appropriate actions to approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, consisting of the 2024 Moreno Valley General Plan Update, 2024 Associated Zoning Text Amendments to Title 9 (Planning & Zoning) and Zoning Atlas Amendments, and 2024 Climate Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project included a comprehensive update of the City’s General Plan that articulates a vision for the City’s growth over the next 20 years, which includes the implementation of five new General Plan land use designations consisting of Business-Flex, Corridor Mixed Use, Center Mixed Use, Downtown Center, and Highway Office/Commercial; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Climate Action Plan (“2024 CAP”) describes and demonstrates how the City will comply with the State’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction standards and goals and streamline environmental review of certain future development projects; and
WHEREAS, the 2024 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments implement the land use policies and regulations, such as but not limited to zoning and development standards, and the goals and objectives set forth and described in the 2024 GPU; and
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-19, approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Certifying the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (“2024 RFEIR”) (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022); and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2026 and May 7, 2026, Notices of Determination were filed and posted, pursuant to Section 21108 and 21152 of the Public Resources Code, at the Office of the Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Riverside, California regarding the April 21, 2026 adoption of Resolution No. 2026-19 approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and Statement of Overriding 243
2 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: October 20, 2026
Considerations and certifying the 2024 RFEIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022) as having been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, in compliance with Assembly Bill 98 and Senate Bill 415, which calls for cities to clearly identify truck routes that can safely handle goods movement while minimizing impacts on neighborhoods, schools, and other sensitive receptor areas, in relation to logistics warehouse facilities, staff has prepared proposed amendments to the Circulation Element of the 2024 MoVal 2040 General Plan and a proposed Ordinance adopting the Official Moreno Valley Truck Routes Map and amending Chapter 12.36 (Truck Routes) of Title 12 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the City’s Municipal Code regarding truck routes (collectively, “Proposed Project”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City is the “Lead Agency” charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the Proposed Project, and as part of its decision-making process, the City as Lead Agency is required to review and consider whether the Proposed Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those previously disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the previously certified 2024 RFEIR; and WHEREAS, staff has determined that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA documentation for the Proposed Project, since no major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are necessary and none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered in that the Proposed Project will not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR, the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR, and no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that will result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, and no new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts have been identified; and
WHEREAS, on August 13, 2026, the Planning Commission conducted the duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law to consider the Proposed Project (PEN26- 0058) and Addendum to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022) at which time all interested persons were provided with an opportunity to testify and present evidence, after which the Planning Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council find and determine that the Addendum prepared for the Revised Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the Moreno Valley City Council April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and Government Code 244
3 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: October 20, 2026
Section 65905, a public hearing was scheduled before the Moreno Valley City Council for September 1, 2026, and notice thereof was duly published in the Press Enterprise Newspaper.

WHEREAS, the City Attorney requested that the Public Hearing be continued to the October 20, 2026, regular City Council meeting to conduct some additional public outreach regarding the proposed revisions to the City’s truck route network and proposed amendments to the Municipal Code and Circulation Element of the City’s recently updated 2024 General Plan, as approved by the City Council on April 21, 2026.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9.02.200 (Public Hearing and Notification Procedures) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and Government Code Section 65905, a public hearing was scheduled before the Moreno Valley City Council for October 20, 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals
That the foregoing Recitals are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by this reference.

Section 2. Evidence
That the City Council has considered all evidence submitted into the administrative record for the Addendum, including but not limited to:
(a) The proposed Circulation Element Amendment and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
(b) The proposed Truck Route Ordinance adopting the Official Moreno Valley Truck Routes Map and amending Chapter 12.36 (Truck Routes) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
(c) The Addendum to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022) and all documents, records, and references contained therein; (d) The previously certified Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022) and all documents, records, and references contained therein;
(e) The City Council Staff Report and all documents, records, references contained therein, and staff presentations related thereto; 245
4 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: October 20, 2026
(f) Testimony and comments received during the public hearings; and (g) All written correspondence submitted before or during the public hearings.

Section 3. Findings
That based on the foregoing Recitals and Evidence contained in the Administrative Record, the City Council finds that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA documentation for the Proposed Project, since no major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are necessary and none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered in that the Proposed Project will not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR, the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR, no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project would be undertaken that will result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, and no new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts have been identified.

Section 4. Approval
That based upon the foregoing Recitals, Evidence contained in the Administrative Record, and Findings, the City Council hereby finds that the Addendum prepared for the MoVal 2040 Revised Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2020039022), which was certified by the Moreno Valley City Council April 21, 2026, complies with the applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 5. Repeal of Conflicting Provisions
That all provisions previously adopted by the City Council in conflict with this Resolution are hereby repealed.

Section 6. Severability
That if any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution be rendered or declared invalid by any court action in a court of competent jurisdiction or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, or words as hereby adopted shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 7. Effective Date
That this Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. 246
5 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: October 20, 2026
Section 8. Certification
That the City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause the same to be processed in the manner required by law.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 2026.
___________________________
Ulises Cabrera
Mayor
City of Moreno Valley
ATTEST:
____________________________
M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
Attachment: Addendum
247
6 Resolution No. 2026-XX
Date Adopted: October 20, 2026

RESOLUTION JURAT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss.

CITY OF MORENO VALLEY )
I, M. Patricia Rodriguez, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Moreno Valley, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2026-XX was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of October, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
(Council Members, Mayor Pro Tem and Mayor)
__________________________________________
M. PATRICIA RODRIGUEZ, MMC, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
248
ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE REVISED FINAL

PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR
THE 2024 MOVAL 2040 PROJECT:
2024 MORENO VALLEY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, 2024
ASSOCIATED ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 9
(PLANNING & ZONING) AND ZONING ATLAS
AMENDMENTS, AND 2024 CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE #2020039022)
SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT

UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK

ROUTES MAP PROJECT
Prepared For:

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development Department
Planning Division
14177 Frederick Street
P.O. Box 88005
Moreno Valley CA 92552-0805
P 951.413.3206
Prepared By:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
P 213.261.4040
JULY 2026
ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO THE REVISED FINAL

UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK

ROUTES MAP PROJECT
Prepared For:

City of Moreno Valley
Community Development Department
Planning Division
14177 Frederick Street
P.O. Box 88005
Moreno Valley CA 92552-0805
P 951.413.3206
Prepared By:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
660 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90017
P 213.261.4040
JULY 2026
249
250
Table of Contents
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project i Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM............................................................................................................ 1 2 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Project ...........................................................................................2

2.2 AB 98 and SB 415 ...................................................................................................................3

2.3 Circulation Element Update....................................................................................................5 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT........................................................................................ 7

3.1 Project Setting and Location...................................................................................................7

3.2 Project Description.................................................................................................................8

3.3 Project Approvals................................................................................................................. 10 4 2024 REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SUMMARY ............................................... 15 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS............................................................................................... 17

5.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................ 18

5.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources ..................................................................................... 21

5.3 Air Quality............................................................................................................................ 25

5.4 Biological Resources............................................................................................................. 37

5.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources................................................................................. 44

5.6 Energy.................................................................................................................................. 51

5.7 Geology and Soils................................................................................................................. 54

5.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................... 58

5.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................ 62

5.10 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................... 65

5.11 Land Use and Planning ......................................................................................................... 68

5.12 Mineral Resources................................................................................................................ 70

5.13 Noise.................................................................................................................................... 72

5.14 Population and Housing ....................................................................................................... 77

5.15 Public Services and Recreation ............................................................................................. 80

5.16 Transportation ..................................................................................................................... 83

5.17 Utilities and Service Systems................................................................................................ 87

5.18 Wildfire................................................................................................................................ 90 6 DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE CEQA DOCUMENTATION.......................................................... 93 7 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................. 96 8 REFERENCES.................................................................................................................................... 97 Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 PURPOSE OFAN ADDENDUM...... cc iiieeiiaacaaaaenmrreeaaaaaaaannrrreeaaaaaaaaannsrreee sassaaaasnnnneeesssssasansnnmneeenes1 2 BACKGROUND.......ceeiieeetieeeeeeetrr eeeaaeceaanneeeeeaaaaaaaaanrrraaaaaaaaaannerreeeeaaaaaaannnnneeeeaassaaannnnnneeeesesssnnnn 2

2.1 p16p.2:BVTAVETWpXaT:al of oY=Totflof£o][=Xof SF 2

2.2 AB98 aNdSB415 cient acer e ee aaa nr reer ea aaa aaa nr rrr eee eee aaa nrr rere eae e ean nnnnrnes 3

2.3 Circulation Element Update... rceessesrere eessere eeeeeeeeennaaas5 3 DESCRIPTIONOFTHEPROPOSEDPROJECT...cceeeeiiiiaaaannreeeeemaaaaraannnrreeaaasssaaasnsnneeesssssssssssnnnsesssssassnnn7

3.1 Project Setting and LOCatioN.........ceeeee eeeerrr 7

3.2 [adoT(t 13 ofgo1 Te o FU 8

3.3 a oTT=Tota2 o]1foLY= £3 10
4 2024 REVISEDFINALENVIRONMENTALIMPACTREPORTSUMMARY.....cooiiiiiiiiirreeee erence 15 5 ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT ANALYSIS... ieee eeeeeetere eee e eee sner recess eee nnr eee e esas es snnnnn eee e ee eennnnns 17

5.1 ABSERELICS «cei eceeereese eeeeeennnneeeeeeeenna18

5.2 Agricultural and FOrestry RESOUICES......ccooeiiiieee cee eres errr e eee e eee a nes 21

5.3 FAN OITE: |11A RRSP PRRPPRRPPRR25

5.4 2300]FaqTor| ITEoLU of X30 EUR 37

5.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural RESOUICES.........coeeeiiiiiiiiiiireeeeeee 44

5.6 [T=]A SPSS 51

5.7 [CTT][=aVA= aToIo | E-3S 54

5.8 Greenhouse Gas EMISSIONS. ..... cc. iiiiiiiiiiiiirreeeaiiiaeir rereeeesees snerrereeseesss nnrrereesaseennnnnnes58

5.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.........ccoiimeem 62

5.10 Hydrology and Water QUality ....cceueeee coerce eer eres eres errr es65

5.11 IF=YTo JURY TeJdFT ooV1 oS 68

5.12 MINEIal RESOUICES....... ci neiieeeiiaacaaaaeternee aaa ae aa aner rece eae ae aa anerr ree esas eas annnnneee eae sasannnnneeessessannns 70

5.13 No EPPS 72

5.14 leToI E=TuTo)oJ] aToIN oTUE|oT 77

5.15 Public Services and ReCreation..........ccccii ciara eee rerrr erase essere eee essen 80

5.16 LIL:1153«ToT =1Tc oN 83

5.17 Utilities and Service SYSTEMS coon eer reese eeeaera 87 LTRI 1 Lo| PTR 90
6 DETERMINATION OFAPPROPRIATE CEQA DOCUMENTATION.......uuiiiiiiiiiiinrrreee eeeeeneeeeeeeeseen93 7 CONCLUSION ....eniiietieeeeteeeeneeetee eeeaaeeaaanneeeeeaaaaaaaaanrrreeeaaaaaa nnnrreeesaaaaaaannrnneeeeeesaaaannnnneessesasannn 96 8 REFERENCES... . ec eetieeeeieeeeeetee eee aaeeaa anne e eee aaaaaaa an nnr rr eee aa aaa an nnnrreeesaaaaaannnrnneeeeeesaaaannnnnneessesasnnn 97 Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project i Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 251
Table of Contents
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project ii Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Regional Location Map............................................................................................................ 11 Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet............................................. 12 Figure 3: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet.......................................... 13 Figure 4: Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet... 14

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040) .................................................... 33 Table 2: Change in 2040 Daily Truck VMT on Selected Routes & Truck Trip Origins................................ 85 Table 3: Net Change in Total Citywide Daily Truck VMT ......................................................................... 85

LIST OF FIGURES
[S700] 300 2T=To)oF=1l WeYor=YulTo oTHY,= o 11
Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet..........cccccoovrrrrrincceninreereeennnee.12 Figure 3: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet..............ecvvrincceiinnnerrennnee.13 Figure 4: Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet...14

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040) .........ccccceeerrrrrrrrnrirereceeeeeeeanes33 Table 2: Change in 2040 Daily Truck VMT on Selected Routes & Truck Trip Origins ........ccceeueeeinrreernnnne. 85 Table 3: Net Change in Total Citywide Daily Truck VIMT.......eeei eres 85

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: MoVal 2040 Revised Final EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment
Appendix C: Traffic Noise Assessment
Appendix D: Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project ii Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 252
Purpose of the Addendum
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 1 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000 et seq.); the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementing CEQA as set forth by the City of Moreno Valley (City). The City is the Lead Agency under CEQA.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that “the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), a subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration is only required when:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

Purpose of the Addendum
1 PURPOSEOF AN ADDENDUM
This Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21000 et seq.); the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations [CCR] Section 15000 et seq.); and the rules, regulations, and procedures for implementing CEQA as set forth by the City of Moreno Valley (City). The City is the Lead Agency under CEQA.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that “the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), a subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Negative Declaration is only required when:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A} The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 1 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 253
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 2 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 2 BACKGROUND

2.1 2024 MoVal 2040 Project
The 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Circulation Element Update Project (Project) implements minor changes and additions to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, which consists of the following:

1. 2024 General Plan Update (2024 GPU), which is a comprehensive General Plan Update that articulates a vision for the City’s growth over the next 20 years, which includes the implementation of five new General Plan land use designations consisting of Business-Flex, Corridor Mixed Use, Center Mixed Use, Downtown Center, and Highway Office/Commercial;

2. 2024 Climate Action Plan (2024 CAP) that describes and demonstrates how the City will comply with the State’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction standards and goals and streamline environmental review of certain future development projects; and

3. 2024 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments to implement the land use policies and regulations, such as but not limited to zoning and development standards, and the goals and objectives set forth and described in the 2024 GPU.

On April 21, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the Moreno Valley City Council (City Council) took the following actions:

1. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-19, approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Certifying the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (2024 RFEIR);

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-20, approving the 2024 GPU and 2024 CAP; and

3. Introduced (First Reading) Ordinance No. 1042, approving the 2024 Zoning Amendments.

Thereafter, on April 24, 2026, a Notice of Determination was filed and posted, pursuant to Section 21108 and 21152 of the Public Resources Code, at the Office of the Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Riverside, California regarding the April 21, 2026 adoption of Resolution No. 2026-19 approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation and Monitoring Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certifying the 2024 RFEIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022) as having been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

On May 5, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed regular meeting of the City Council, the City Council passed and adopted (Second Reading) Ordinance No. 1042 approving the 2024 Zoning Amendments, which amended the text of Title 9 (Planning & Zoning) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and the City’s official Zoning Atlas to ensure that the text of Title 9 and the zoning designations depicted in the Zoning Atlas are consistent with the land use policies and regulations set forth and described in the 2024 GPU.

On April 21, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the Moreno Valley City Council (City Council) took the following actions:

2. Adopted Resolution No. 2026-20, approving the 2024 GPU and 2024 CAP; and

3. Introduced (First Reading) Ordinance No. 1042, approving the 2024 Zoning Amendments.

On May 5, 2026, in the context of a duly noticed regular meeting of the City Council, the City Council passed and adopted (Second Reading} Ordinance No. 1042 approving the 2024 Zoning Amendments, which amended the text of Title 9 (Planning & Zoning) of the Moreno Valley Municipal Code and the City’s official Zoning Atlas to ensure that the text of Title 9 and the zoning designations depicted in the Zoning Atlas are consistent with the land use policies and regulations set forth and described in the 2024 GPU.

Thereafter, on May 7, 2026, a Notice of Determination regarding the second reading of Ordinance No. 1042 was filed and posted, pursuant to Section 21108 and 21152 of the Public Resources Code, at the Office of Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder of the County of Riverside, California regarding the April 21, 2026 adoption of Resolution No. 2026-19 approving and adopting the Findings of Fact, Mitigation and Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 2 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 254
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 3 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Monitoring Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certifying the 2024 RFEIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022) as having been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

2.2 AB 98 and SB 415
On September 29, 2024, Assembly Bill 98 (AB 98) was signed into law by Governor Newsom and requires jurisdictions within the State’s designated logistics warehouse concentration regions (which include the City of Moreno Valley) to update their General Plan Circulation Elements by January 1, 2026, to identify and establish designated truck routes for the movement of goods. AB 98 responds to the public health, environmental, and quality-of-life impacts stemming from the growth of logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 requires local jurisdictions to designate truck routes that prioritize the use of major arterials and highways, avoid sensitive land uses such as, but not limited to, homes, schools, and healthcare facilities, and include public signage and accessible mapping. AB 98 also imposes new development standards for logistics warehouse facilities, including setbacks, buffers, air-quality mitigation, and the use of zeroemission equipment. The intent of AB 98 is to create a more equitable and sustainable approach to goods movement associated with logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 aims to reduce disproportionate burdens on vulnerable communities, promote cleaner industrial practices, and balance economic development with public health and environmental justice.

On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom then signed into law Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), which defined various standards initially introduced in AB 98.1SB 415 defines specific logistics warehouse development standards, truck route ordinance requirements, and environmental protection requirements, including those pertaining to air quality and health impacts. However, at the time AB 98 and SB 415 were signed into law, the City was in the process of preparing the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2024 RFEIR) in response to a Judgment and Writ issued by Riverside County Superior Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No. CVRI2103300).

In June 2021 and August 2021, the City Council approved the previous MoVal 2040 Project which consisted of the 2021 General Plan Update (2021 GPU), 2021 Climate Action Plan (2021 CAP), and related 2021 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments (2021 Zoning Amendments), (collectively, the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project) and certified 2021 Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2021 FEIR) prepared for 2021 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, the Sierra Club filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the Riverside County Superior Court (Case No. CVRI2103300), challenging the City’s decision to certify the 2021 FEIR and approve the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project.

Subsequently, the California Attorney General intervened in the case through the filing of a Petition for Writ of Mandate-in-Intervention.

The case was concluded with a Statement of Decision from the Riverside County Superior Court (Court), dated March 5, 2024, in which the Court granted the petition on the issues limited to baseline (existing conditions analysis), air quality, climate change (greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions), and energy use. The Statement of Decision was followed by the Judgment and Writ issued by the Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No. CVRI2103300). The Writ commanded the City to set aside the City Council’s certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021 GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 1 California Legislative Information, Senate Bill No. 415, Planning and Zoning, Logistics Use Development Truck Routes, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB415. Accessed January 8, 2026 Background
Monitoring Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certifying the 2024 RFEIR (State Clearinghouse Number 2020039022) as having been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.
22 AB 98 and SB 415
On September 29, 2024, Assembly Bill 98 (AB 98) was signed into law by Governor Newsom and requires jurisdictions within the State’s designated logistics warehouse concentration regions (which include the City of Moreno Valley) to update their General Plan Circulation Elements by January 1, 2026, to identify and establish designated truck routes for the movement of goods. AB 98 responds to the public health, environmental, and quality-of-life impacts stemming from the growth of logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 requires local jurisdictions to designate truck routes that prioritize the use of major arterials and highways, avoid sensitive land uses such as, but not limited to, homes, schools, and healthcare facilities, and include public signage and accessible mapping. AB 98 also imposes new development standards for logistics warehouse facilities, including setbacks, buffers, air-quality mitigation, and the use of zeroemission equipment. The intent of AB 98 is to create a more equitable and sustainable approach to goods movement associated with logistics warehouse facilities. AB 98 aims to reduce disproportionate burdens on vulnerable communities, promote cleaner industrial practices, and balance economic development with public health and environmental justice.

On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom then signed into law Senate Bill 415 (SB 415), which defined various standards initially introduced in AB 98." SB415 defines specific logistics warehouse development standards, truck route ordinance requirements, and environmental protection requirements, including those pertaining to air quality and health impacts. However, at the time AB 98 and SB 415 were signed into law, the City was in the process of preparing the 2024 Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2024 RFEIR} in response to a Judgment and Writ issued by Riverside County Superior Court on May 6, 2024 (CaseNo. CVRI2103300).

In June 2021and August 2021, the City Council approved the previous MoVal 2040 Project which consisted of the 2021 General Plan Update (2021 GPU}, 2021 Climate Action Plan (2021 CAP), and related 2021 Associated Zoning Text and Zoning Atlas Amendments (2021Zoning Amendments), (collectively, the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project) and certified 2021Final Program Environmental Impact Report (2021FEIR) prepared for 2021 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, the Sierra Club filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory Relief in the Riverside County Superior Court {Case No. CVRI2103300), challenging the City’s decision to certify the 2021 FEIR and approve the 2021 MoVal 2040 Project.

Subsequently, the California Attorney General intervened in the case through the filing of a Petition for Writ of Mandate-in-Intervention.

The case was concluded with a Statement of Decision from the Riverside County Superior Court (Court), dated March 5, 2024, in which the Court granted the petition on the issues limited to baseline (existing conditions analysis), air quality, climate change (greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions), and energy use. The Statement of Decision was followed by the Judgment and Writ issued by the Court on May 6, 2024 (Case No. CVRI2103300). The Writ commanded the City to set aside the City Council's certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 1 California Legislative Information, Senate Bill No. 415, Planning and Zoning, Logistics Use Development Truck Routes, https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB415. AccessedJanuary 8, 2026 Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 3 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 255
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 4 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 2021 CAP and 2021 Zoning Amendments. In the City’s Final Return to the Writ and Request for Discharge of the Writ, the City confirmed that, in compliance with the Writ, it took the appropriate actions to set aside certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021 GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 2021 CAP and 2021 Zoning Amendments. All parties stipulated to the City’s compliance with the Writ which Court then fully discharged on September 19, 2024.

Immediately after the Court’s discharge of the Writ, the City commenced the preparation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (consisting of the 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP, and 2024 Zoning Amendments) and the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Project’s Revised Draft Program EIR (2024 RDEIR), to correct the deficiencies identified in the Writ, consistent with the Statement of Decision. On August 14, 2025, a public scoping meeting was held to solicit input from the public and interested agencies on the scope of the necessary environmental analysis for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Following the scoping meeting, the 2024 RDEIR was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period, commencing July 7, 2025, through August 21, 2025, followed by a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley Planning Commission (Planning Commission) on October 9, 2025, to consider the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and the 2024 RDEIR. However, due to the receipt of a letter from the State of California Office of the Attorney General Office (AGO) on October 7, 2025, regarding the proposed 2024 CAP and the 2024 RDEIR’s various air quality issues and mitigation measures, the Moreno Valley City Attorney recommended that the Planning Commission continue the October 9, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing to provide staff sufficient time to respond to the various issues and mitigation measures raised by the AGO. As such, the Planning Commission continued the October 9, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing to the Planning Commission’s regular meeting, scheduled for October 23, 2025. At the duly noticed October 23, 2025 public hearing, after hearing a staff report, receiving public testimony and engaging in deliberation, the Planning Commission voted to: (a) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, at a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley City Council, the City Council voted to adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (PEN25-0020).

Notwithstanding the certification of the 2024 RFEIR and approval of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, and the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, from November 2025 through April 2026, the City was simultaneously committed to engaging the public and interested stakeholders in the preparation of a revised truck route map and related amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 GPU in compliance with the mandates set forth in AB 98 and SB 415. However, due to the City’s concentrated efforts and time and resources committed to analyzing and preparing the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and 2024 RDEIR and 2024 RFIER and the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, the City informed the AGO that it was necessary that the City be provided additional time to conduct the necessary community engagement to solicit thorough and meaningful input from the public and other interested stakeholders on revisions to the City current truck routes map to ensure that the proper changes are made not only in compliance with the mandates of AB 98 and SB 415, but also consistent with the plans and policies of the various elements of the City’s recently approved 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP and 2024 Zoning Amendments and the applicable mitigation measures (PEN26-0055) set forth in the 2024 RFIER and the objectives of the airBackground 2021CAP and 2021 Zoning Amendments. In the City’s Final Return to the Writ and Request for Discharge of the Writ, the City confirmed that, in compliance with the Writ, it took the appropriate actions to set aside certification of the 2021 FEIR and approval of the 2021 GPU (excepting the City’s Housing Element adopted in October 2022), the 2021CAP and 2021Zoning Amendments. All parties stipulated to the City’s compliance with the Writ which Court then fully discharged on September 19, 2024.

Immediately after the Court’s discharge of the Writ, the City commenced the preparation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (consisting of the 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP, and 2024 Zoning Amendments) and the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project Project's Revised Draft Program EIR {2024 RDEIR), to correct the deficiencies identified in the Writ, consistent with the Statement of Decision. On August 14, 2025, a public scoping meeting was held to solicit input from the public and interested agencies on the scope of the necessary environmental analysis for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Following the scoping meeting, the 2024 RDEIR was prepared and circulated for a 45-day public review period, commencing July 7, 2025, through August 21, 2025, followed by a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley Planning Commission (Planning Commission) on October 9, 2025, to consider the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and the 2024 RDEIR. However, due to the receipt of a letter from the State of California Office of the Attorney General Office (AGO) on October 7, 2025, regarding the proposed 2024 CAP and the 2024 RDEIR’s various air quality issues and mitigation measures, the Moreno Valley City Attorney recommended that the Planning Commission continue the October 9, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing to provide staff sufficient time to respond to the various issues and mitigation measures raised by the AGO. As such, the Planning Commission continued the October 9, 2025 Planning Commission public hearing to the Planning Commission’s regular meeting, scheduled for October 23, 2025. At the duly noticed October 23, 2025 public hearing, after hearing a staff report, receiving public testimony and engaging in deliberation, the Planning Commission voted to: (a) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR;and (b) adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Thereafter, at a duly noticed public hearing of the Moreno Valley City Council, the City Council voted to adopt the Findings of Fact, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Statement of Overriding Considerations and certify the 2024 RFEIR; and (b) approve the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project (PEN25-0020).

Notwithstanding the certification of the 2024 RFEIR and approval of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, and the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, from November 2025 through April 2026, the City was simultaneously committed to engaging the public and interested stakeholders in the preparation of a revised truck route map and related amendment to the Circulation Element of the 2024 GPU in compliance with the mandates set forth in AB 98 and SB 415. However, due to the City’s concentrated efforts and time and resources committed to analyzing and preparing the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project and 2024 RDEIR and 2024 RFIER and the ongoing negotiations with the AGO, the City informed the AGO that it was necessary that the City be provided additional time to conduct the necessary community engagement to solicit thorough and meaningful input from the public and other interested stakeholders on revisions to the City current truck routes map to ensure that the proper changes are made not only in compliance with the mandates of AB 98 and SB 415, but also consistent with the plans and policies of the various elements of the City’s recently approved 2024 GPU, 2024 CAP and 2024 Zoning Amendments and the applicable mitigation measures (PEN26-0055) set forth in the 2024 RFIER and the objectives of the airSupporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 4 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 256
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 5 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report quality related mitigation measures under negotiations with the AGO which on June 25, 2026 , in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve in the context of an ordinance, titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Amending Chapter 9.05 (Industrial Districts) of Title 9 (Planning And Zoning) to add Section 9.05.060 (Logistics Use Facilities Mitigation Measures).” (AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance) Incidentally, the mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO exceed the minimum comparative requirements of AB 98 and SB 415, and the proposed ordinance containing the negotiated mitigation measures has been scheduled for the City Council’s consideration at a noticed public hearing at its regular meeting on August 18, 2026.

2.3 Circulation Element Amendment and Truck Route Map Update Ordinance
AB 98 and SB 415 call for cities to clearly identify truck routes that can safely handle goods movement while minimizing impacts on neighborhoods, schools, and other sensitive receptor areas, in relation to logistics warehouse facilities. The City proposes to comply with AB 98 and SB 415 by revising the Circulation Element and amending Chapter 36 of the Title 12 of the City’s Municipal Code regarding truck routes (“Truck Route Ordinance”), as described in Section 3, below (collectively, the “Project”). The City’s Circulation Element Update satisfies the statutory requirements for the General Plan Circulation Element and provides a circulation diagram identifying major thoroughfares; transportation routes for vehicles, transit, bicycles, and pedestrians; and also a military airport. The Circulation Element Update also includes policies for “complete streets,” which provide a balanced, multimodal transportation network serving all users and abilities and supports other chapters of the General Plan by providing and enhancing multimodal transportation options and supporting adjacent land uses.

This Addendum analyzes potential impacts of the Project as described herein, as compared to impacts identified and evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR. As identified above, pursuant to provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City is the “Lead Agency” charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the Project. As part of its decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider whether the Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those previously disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the in the 2024 RFEIR. Additional CEQA review beyond this Addendum would only be triggered if the Project would result in new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA document for the Project, if the City finds that major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are not necessary and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered.

As detailed herein, the Project would not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR. As demonstrated in this Addendum, the potential impacts associated with the Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Background
quality related mitigation measures under negotiations with the AGO which on June 25, 2026 , in the context of a duly noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve in the context of an ordinance, titled “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Moreno Valley, California, Amending Chapter 9.05 (Industrial Districts) of Title 9 (Planning And Zoning) to add Section 9.05.060 (Logistics Use Facilities Mitigation Measures).” (AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance) Incidentally, the mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO exceed the minimum comparative requirements of AB 98 and SB 415, and the proposed ordinance containing the negotiated mitigation measures has been scheduled for the City Council's consideration at a noticed public hearing at its regular meeting on August 18, 2026.

This Addendum analyzes potential impacts of the Project as described herein, as compared to impacts identified and evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR. As identified above, pursuant to provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City is the “Lead Agency” charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the Project. As part of its decision-making process, the City is required to review and consider whether the Project would create new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those previously disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the in the 2024 RFEIR.Additional CEQA review beyond this Addendum would only be triggered if the Project would result in new significant impacts or more severe significant impacts than those disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that an Addendum is the appropriate CEQA document for the Project, if the City finds that major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR are not necessary and that none of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR (SEIR) are triggered.

As detailed herein, the Project would not result in any new significant impacts and/or more severe impacts that were not disclosed, analyzed and mitigated for in the 2024 RFEIR.As demonstrated in this Addendum, the potential impacts associated with the Project would either be the same or less than those described in the 2024 RFEIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than those previously addressed in the 2024 RFEIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. Therefore, in accordance with CEQA Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 5 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 257
Background
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 6 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Guidelines Section 15164, this Addendum to the previously certified 2024 RFEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decisionmaking body must consider the whole of the data presented in the 2024 RFEIR and the previously adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), as augmented by this Addendum.

Background
Guidelines Section 15164, this Addendum to the previously certified 2024 RFEIR is the appropriate environmental documentation for the Project. In taking action on any of the approvals, the decisionmaking body must consider the whole of the data presented in the 2024 RFEIR and the previously adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), as augmented by this Addendum.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 6 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 258
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 7 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT
The Project consists of: (1) a proposed amendment, as mandated by AB 98 and SB 415, to the Circulation Element of the 2024 GPU, approved as part of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, to include revisions to the revisions to the discussion, policies, actions and exhibits and corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element’s and exhibits, and corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element’s Goods Movement section; and (2) a proposed Truck Route Ordinance containing revisions to the City’s designated truck routes map and truck route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code consistent with the City’s amended Circulation Element and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415 and consistent with the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.

3.1 Project Setting and Location

3.1.1 Regional Location
The City is located in the western part of Riverside County. Interstate 215 (I-215) lies west of the City and State Route 60 (SR 60) runs through the northern portion of the City; see Figure 1: Regional Location Map.

These highways are accessed by multiple on/off ramps throughout the City and intersect in the western portion of the City (west of the Moreno Valley Mall) just outside of the City limits. The northern border of the City backs up to the Reche Canyon/Box Springs Mountain Reserve, which is just south of the Riverside/San Bernardino County line. To the east of the City lies the City of Beaumont, to the south is the City of Perris, and to the west is the City of Riverside.

3.1.2 Moreno Valley Truck Routes
The City’s ready access to the regional transportation network, which is supported by rail, air, and freeway connections, makes it a desirable location for goods movement. Goods movement in the City occurs primarily on major highways that bisect and border the City, including SR 60 and I-215. Truck traffic on City streets is restricted to specific routes that are designated for through traffic of trucks over three tons; the truck network system is identified in the City’s Municipal Code. These truck routes help facilitate the movement of goods throughout the City, while providing a connection between major highway facilities (i.e., SR 60 and I-215) to local roadways, such as Alessandro Boulevard, Heacock Street and Perris Boulevard. Truck traffic is restricted to these designated roadways, unless otherwise authorized by the California Vehicle Code, in order to minimize degradation of City streets and promote safety on residential streets. In addition, the City supports improvements to regional goods-movement facilities, such as aviation cargo operations at March Air Reserve Base/March Inland Port.

Existing Truck Routes
The City’s existing truck routes are shown on Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet. This figure shows areas of potential conflict where sensitive receptors, as defined in AB 98 and SB 415 (e.g., schools, parks, care facilities, and residential areas), are located within 1,000 feet of an existing truck route. As shown in Figure 2, SR 60 and I-215 are part of the federally designated National Network Route. The key segments of the City’s existing truck routes are Perris Boulevard, Alessandro Boulevard, Frederick Street, and Heacock Street, which carry some of the highest truck volumes in the City, with daily truck traffic exceeding approximately 1,300 to 1,600 trucks. Perris Description of the Proposed Project
3 DESCRIPTIONOF THE PROPOSEDPROJECT
The Project consists of: (1) a proposed amendment, as mandated by AB 98 and SB 415, to the Circulation Element of the 2024 GPU, approved as part of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, to include revisions to the revisions to the discussion, policies, actions and exhibits and corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element’s and exhibits, and corrections of grammatical errors contained in or associated with the Circulation Element’s Goods Movement section; and (2) a proposed Truck Route Ordinance containing revisions to the City’s designated truck routes map and truck route provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code consistent with the City’s amended Circulation Element and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415 and consistent with the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.
31 Project Setting and Location

3.1.1 Regional Location
The City is located in the western part of Riverside County. Interstate 215 (1-215) lies west of the City and State Route 60 (SR 60) runs through the northern portion of the City; see Figure 1: Regional Location Map.

3.1.2 Moreno Valley Truck Routes
The City’s ready access to the regional transportation network, which is supported by rail, air, and freeway connections, makes it a desirable location for goods movement. Goods movement in the City occurs primarily on major highways that bisect and border the City, including SR 60 and 1-215. Truck traffic on City streets is restricted to specific routes that are designated for through traffic of trucks over three tons; the truck network system is identified in the City’s Municipal Code.These truck routes help facilitate the movement of goods throughout the City, while providing a connection between major highway facilities (i.e., SR 60 and 1-215) to local roadways, such as Alessandro Boulevard, Heacock Street and Perris Boulevard. Truck traffic is restricted to these designated roadways, unless otherwise authorized by the California Vehicle Code, in order to minimize degradation of City streets and promote safety on residential streets. In addition, the City supports improvements to regional goods-movement facilities, such as aviation cargo operations at March Air Reserve Base/March Inland Port.

Existing Truck Routes
The City’s existing truck routes are shown on Figure 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet. This figure shows areas of potential conflict where sensitive receptors, as defined in AB 98 and SB 415 (e.g., schools, parks, care facilities, and residential areas), are located within 1,000 feet of an existing truck route. As shown in Figure 2, SR 60 and 1-215 are part of the federally designated National Network Route. The key segments of the City’s existing truck routes are Perris Boulevard, Alessandro Boulevard, Frederick Street, and Heacock Street, which carry some of the highest truck volumes in the City, with daily truck traffic exceeding approximately 1,300 to 1,600 trucks. Perris Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 7 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 259
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 8 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Boulevard and Heacock Street, particularly north of Alessandro Boulevard, function as key north–south connectors. These segments pass through established residential neighborhoods and areas with a concentration of schools and community facilities, which are considered sensitive receptors. Alessandro Boulevard, which serves as a major east–west corridor, is largely commercial in character; however, segments, particularly east of Heacock Street, interface with residential uses and schools. Frederick Street and portions of Redlands Boulevard exhibit a similar pattern, where commercial uses are interspersed with residential neighborhoods, increasing the potential for conflicts with sensitive receptors.

3.2 Project Description
As discussed in Section 2, Background, of this Addendum, AB 98 and SB 415 require cities to clearly identify truck routes that can safely handle goods movement while minimizing impacts on neighborhoods, schools, and other sensitive areas. The Project updates the existing truck routes network in the City to better align with the goals of AB 98 and SB 415.

3.2.1 Proposed Truck Routes
The Project proposes to revise the City’s truck routes network as shown on Figure 3: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors within 1,000 Feet. The existing truck routes that will be eliminated as officially designated truck routes from the proposed truck route network are shown in Figure 4, Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet. As shown in Figures 3 and 4, with the elimination of a multitude of existing truck routes, the realignment of others, and the addition of segments of Eucalyptus Avenue east of Redlands Boulevard and Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus Avenue and SR 60, the proposed truck routes network would reduce truck travel activity on local streets and nearby sensitive receptors and shift freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215 while prioritizing access to industrial areas that permit logistics warehouse facilities. The proposed truck routes network, as shown in Figure 3, are mainly limited to the portions of Alessandro Boulevard, Cactus Avenue, Perris Boulevard, and several future interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses.

The World Logistics Center Specific Plan (WLC Specific Plan) includes a circulation network intended to move large vehicles efficiently between the regional highway network and businesses within the Specific Plan Area while directing heavy truck traffic away from nearby residential neighborhoods and other sensitive receptors. Heavy truck traffic associated with the WLC Specific Plan is directed to State Route (SR) 60, Gilman Springs Road, the segment of Redlands Boulevard between SR 60 and Eucalyptus Avenue, and Eucalyptus Avenue between Redlands Boulevard and World Logistics Center Parkway. These roadways, together with the WLC Specific Plan Area’s internal roadway network that has yet to be fully constructed, are designated as truck routes within the Specific Plan and will be designated as such on the City’s Truck Route Map. Development and occupancy of the WLC Specific Plan area are anticipated to occur over the next 10 years.

Due to existing development patterns and limited alternative corridors, complete avoidance of sensitive receptors is not feasible in all locations. As such, the City will implement a combination of mitigation and operational strategies, including signage, buffering, and traffic management measures. The Circulation Element Amendment also indicates that the City will require new logistics developments to prepare truck routing plans consistent with the designated truck routes network, which will be subject to periodic review Description of the Proposed Project
Boulevard and Heacock Street, particularly north of Alessandro Boulevard, function as key north—south connectors. These segments pass through established residential neighborhoods and areas with a concentration of schools and community facilities, which are considered sensitive receptors. Alessandro Boulevard, which serves as a major east-west corridor, is largely commercial in character; however, segments, particularly east of Heacock Street, interface with residential uses and schools. Frederick Street and portions of Redlands Boulevard exhibit a similar pattern, where commercial uses are interspersed with residential neighborhoods, increasing the potential for conflicts with sensitive receptors.

3.2 Project Description
As discussed in Section 2, Background, of this Addendum, AB 98 and SB415 require cities to clearly identify truck routes that can safely handle goods movement while minimizing impacts on neighborhoods, schools, and other sensitive areas. The Project updates the existing truck routes network in the City to better align with the goals of AB 98 and SB 415.

Due to existing development patterns and limited alternative corridors, complete avoidance of sensitive receptors is not feasible in all locations. As such, the City will implement a combination of mitigation and operational strategies, including signage, buffering, and traffic management measures. The Circulation Element Amendment also indicates that the City will require new logistics developments to prepare truck routing plans consistent with the designated truck routes network, which will be subject to periodic review Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 8 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 260
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 9 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report for any necessary updates to respond to land use changes, community concerns, and evolving goods movement patterns.

Truck routes in adjacent jurisdictions may not align with the Project’s proposed truck route network; however, in such cases (as discussed below), trucks are permitted to utilize non-designated local streets within the City to access the nearest designated truck route. In addition, trucks serving local commercial and industrial uses will continue to utilize the most direct routes where necessary, as alternative designated routes may not provide feasible access to final destinations. 2 3.2.2 Proposed Policies and Actions
The Project would also revise the policies and actions that support Goal C-6 of the Circulation Element, which directs the City to provide for safe, efficient goods movement by road, air, and rail. The following new actions are proposed to support Goal C-6:
• Maintain and regularly update a publicly accessible Truck Route Map, including GIS data, to clearly identify designated routes and support enforcement and coordination with regional agencies. • Require new logistics warehouse developments to be located and designed to minimize reliance on local streets and avoid creating new truck traffic conflicts with sensitive receptors. • Coordinate with Caltrans, neighboring jurisdictions, and regional agencies to align truck routes and minimize the need for trucks servicing logistics warehouse developments to use nondesignated local streets.

Additionally, the Project would revise existing actions outlined in the Circulation Element to maintain internal consistency amongst the other proposed revisions to the Circulation Element, which further define actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided. Together, these revisions incorporate the development and siting standards required by AB 98 and SB 415 and are consistent with the air qualityrelated mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Ordinance. As such, these actions are included to support Goal C-6:
• Avoid routing truck traffic through or adjacent to sensitive land uses to the extent feasible; where avoidance is not feasible due to existing conditions, implement mitigation measures such as buffering, signage, and operational controls.
• Continue to require all new or expanded logistics warehouse developments to comply with the air quality-related mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.
2 California Vehicle Code § 35703 mandates that no city may adopt a truck route ordinance that prohibits "any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained." Moreover, 49 USCS § 31114(a) requires that "[a] State may not enact or enforce a law denying to a commercial motor vehicle subject to this subchapter [49 USCS §§ 31111 et seq.] or subchapter I of this chapter [49 USCS §§ 31101 et seq.] reasonable access between—the Dwight D. Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways (except a segment exempted under section 31111(f) or 31113(e) of this title [49 USCS § 31111(f) or 31113(e)]) and other qualifying Federal-aid Primary System highways designated by the Secretary of Transportation; and terminals, facilities for food, fuel, repairs, and rest, and points of loading and unloading for household goods carriers, motor carriers of passengers, any towaway trailer transporter combination (as defined in section 31111(a) [49 USCS § 31111(a)]), or any truck tractor-semitrailer combination in which the semitrailer has a length of not more than 28.5 feet and that generally operates as part of a vehicle combination described in section 31111(c) of this title [49 USCS § 31111(c)]." Description of the Proposed Project
for any necessary updates to respond to land use changes, community concerns, and evolving goods movement patterns.

Truck routes in adjacent jurisdictions may not align with the Project's proposed truck route network; however, in such cases (as discussed below), trucks are permitted to utilize non-designated local streets within the City to access the nearest designated truck route. In addition, trucks serving local commercial and industrial uses will continue to utilize the most direct routes where necessary, as alternative designated routes may not provide feasible access to final destinations.?

3.2.2 Proposed Policies and Actions
The Project would also revise the policies and actions that support Goal C-6 of the Circulation Element, which directs the City to provide for safe, efficient goods movement by road, air, and rail. The following new actions are proposed to support Goal C-6:
eo Maintain and regularly update a publicly accessible Truck Route Map, including GISdata,to clearly identify designated routes and support enforcement and coordination with regional agencies. eo Require new logistics warehouse developments to be located and designed to minimize reliance on local streets and avoid creating new truck traffic conflicts with sensitive receptors. e Coordinate with Caltrans, neighboring jurisdictions, and regional agencies to align truck routes and minimize the need for trucks servicing logistics warehouse developments to use nondesignated local streets.

Additionally, the Project would revise existing actions outlined in the Circulation Element to maintain internal consistency amongst the other proposed revisions to the Circulation Element, which further define actions when sensitive receptors cannot be avoided. Together, these revisions incorporate the development and siting standards required by AB 98 and SB 415 and are consistent with the air qualityrelated mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Ordinance. As such, these actions are included to support Goal C-6:
e Avoid routing truck traffic through or adjacent to sensitive land uses to the extent feasible; where avoidance is not feasible due to existing conditions, implement mitigation measures such as buffering, signage, and operational controls.
e Continue to require all new or expanded logistics warehouse developments to comply with the air quality-related mitigation measures negotiated with the AGO, as set forth in the AGO Negotiated Mitigation Measures Ordinance.
2 California Vehicle Code § 35703 mandates that no city may adopt a truck route ordinance that prohibits "any commercial vehicles coming from an unrestricted street having ingress and egress by direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares, and merchandise from or to any building or structure located on the restricted street or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair, alteration, remodeling, or construction of any building or structure upon the restricted street for which a building permit has previously been obtained." Moreover, 49 USCS § 31114(a) requires that "[a] State may not enact or enforce a law denying to a commercial motor vehicle subject to this subchapter [49 USCS§§ 31111 et seq.] or subchapter | of this chapter [49 USCS§§ 31101et seq.] reasonable access between—the Dwight D.Eisenhower System of Interstate and Defense Highways {except a segment exempted under section 31111(f) or 31113{e) of this title [49 USCS§ 31111(f) or 31113(e}]} and other qualifying Federal-aid Primary System highways designated by the Secretary of Transportation; and terminals, facilities for food, fuel, repairs, and rest, and points of loading and unloading for household goods carriers, motor carriers of passengers, any towaway trailer transporter combination (as defined in section 31111(a) [49 USCS§ 31111(a}]}, or any truck tractor-semitrailer combination in which the semitrailer has a length of not more than 28.5 feet and that generally operates as part of a vehicle combination described in section 31111(c} of this title [49 USCS § 31111{(c)]." Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 9 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 261
Description of the Proposed Project
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 10 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

3.3 Project Approvals
The City is the Lead Agency as set forth in CEQA Statute Section 21067 and is responsible for reviewing and approving the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR. In order to implement the Project, the City would need to take the following discretionary actions:
• Adopt a Resolution Approving the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR; • Adopt a Resolution Approving the Circulation Element Update; and • Introduce and subsequently Pass/Adopt a Truck Route Ordinance and a Truck Routes Map containing revisions to the provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the City’s amended Circulation Element and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB 415 and the Mitigation Measures Ordinance negotiated with the California Attorney General’s Office.

Description of the Proposed Project

3.3 Project Approvals
The City is the Lead Agency as set forth in CEQA Statute Section 21067 and is responsible for reviewing and approving the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR. In order to implement the Project, the City would need to take the following discretionary actions:
eo Adopt a Resolution Approving the Addendum to the 2024 RFEIR; eo Adopt a Resolution Approving the Circulation Element Update; and e Introduce and subsequently Pass/Adopt a Truck Route Ordinance and a Truck Routes Map containing revisions to the provisions contained in the Moreno Valley Municipal Code, consistent with the City’s amended Circulation Element and in compliance with the pertinent provisions of AB 98 and SB415 and the Mitigation Measures Ordinance negotiated with the California Attorney General's Office.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 10 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 262
FIGURE 2-1 REGIONAL LOCATION
MoVal 2040 Revised Draft Program EIR NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 2-1
Regional Location
Map Source: Dyett & Bhatia
Pacific
Ocean

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Riverside
Menifee
Perris
Hemet
Corona
Temecula
Murrieta
Moreno
Valley
Jurupa
Valley
Lake
Elsinore
Beaumont
Wildomar
San
Jacinto
Norco
Calimesa
Eastvale
Canyon
Lake
Oceanside
Ontario
Fontana
Yucaipa
Chino
Rancho
Cucamonga Highland
Upland
Montclair Pomona Redlands
Chino
Hills
Claremont
Rialto
San
Bermardino
Loma
Linda
Grand
Terrace
Colton
Irvine
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
Mission Viejo
Lake
Forest
San
Clemente
Laguna
Niguel
Aliso
Viejo
San Juan
Capistrano Dana
Point
Laguna
Hills
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
Orange
Laguna
Beach
Laguna
Woods
Lake Elsinore
Diamond Valley Lake
Lake
Perris
Lake Mathews
Vail Lake
Skinner Reservoir
Santiago
Reservoir
Railroad
Canyon
Reservoir
Chino Airport
Ontario International Airport
San Bernardino
International Airport
Hemet-Ryan Airport
Perris Valley Airport
Riverside Municipal Airport
French Valley Airport
Flabob Airport
Corona Municipal Airport
Redlands Municipal Airport
Fallbrook Community Airpark
March
Air
Reserve
Base
15 10
5 215
10 215
15 15
15 5
10 215
10 60
79 60
83 71
66 66
74 79
76 74 1
73 261
241
133
210 210
38 74
79 San Bernardino National Forest
Cleveland National Forest
Lake Perris State Recreation Area
Limestone
Canyon
Regional Park
Oneill
Regional
Park
Prado
Regional
Park
Palomar Mountain State Park
Santa Ana River
Regional Park
Kabian
County
Park
Jurupa Hills
Regional Park
Bogart
County
Park
Salt Creek
Corridor
Regional Park
Yucaipa
Regional
Park
California Citrus
State Historic Park
Guajome Park
Cucamonga-Guasti Regional Park
San Clemente
State Beach
Doheny
State Beach
San Onofre
State Beach
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Double
Butte
Park
Lake Skinner
Recreation Area
Chino Hills
State Park
Orange
County
Park
Hartford
Springs
Reserve
Camp Pendleton
Marine Corpe Base

Major Highways
Railroads
City of Moreno Valley
Cities
Water
Airports
Parks and Open Space

FIGURE 2-1
Regional Location
M:\JOBS5\9504\env\graphics\fig2-1.ai 01/21/21 fmm
Map Source: Dyett & Bhatia
Pacific
Ocean

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY
Riverside
Menifee
Perris
Hemet
Corona
Temecula
Murrieta
Moreno
Valley
Jurupa
Valley
Lake
Elsinore
Beaumont
Wildomar
San
Jacinto
Norco
Calimesa
Eastvale
Canyon
Lake
Oceanside
Ontario
Fontana
Yucaipa
Chino
Rancho
Cucamonga Highland
Upland
Montclair Pomona Redlands
Chino
Hills
Claremont
Rialto
San
Bermardino
Loma
Linda
Grand
Terrace
Colton
Irvine
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
MissionViejo
Lake
Forest
San
Clemente
Laguna
Niguel
Aliso
Viejo
San Juan
Capistrano Dana
Point
Laguna
Hills
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
Orange
Laguna
Beach
Laguna
Woods
Lake Elsinore
Diamond Valley Lake
Lake
Perris
Lake Mathews
Vail Lake
Skinner Reservoir
Santiago
Reservoir
Railroad
Canyon
Reservoir
Chino Airport
Ontario International Airport
San Bernardino
International Airport
Hemet-Ryan Airport
Perris Valley Airport
Riverside Municipal Airport
French Valley Airport
Flabob Airport
Corona Municipal Airport
Redlands Municipal Airport
Fallbrook Community Airpark
March
Air
Reserve
Base
15 10
5 215
10 215
15 15
15 5
10 215
10 60
79 60
83 71
66 66
74 79
76 74 1
73 261
241
133
210 210
38 74
79 San Bernardino National Forest
Cleveland National Forest
Lake Perris State Recreation
Area
Limestone
Canyon
Regional Park
Oneill
Regional
Park
Prado
Regional
Park
Palomar Mountain State Park
Santa Ana River
Regional Park
Kabian
County
Park
Jurupa Hills
Regional Park
Bogart
County
Park
Salt Creek
Corridor
Regional Park
Yucaipa
Regional
Park
California Citrus
State Historic Park
Guajome Park
Cucamonga-Guasti Regional Park
San Clemente
State Beach
Doheny
State Beach
San Onofre
State Beach
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Double
Butte
Park
Lake Skinner
Recreation Area
Chino Hills
State Park
Orange
County
Park
Hartford
Springs
Reserve
Camp Pendleton
Marine Corpe Base

Major Highways
Railroads
City of MorenoValley
Cities
Water
Airports
Parks and Open Space

Regional Location
FIGURE 2-1
fmm

SAN DIEGO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ORANGE COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

ARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY

DINO COUNTY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

RIVERSIDE COUNTY
Riverside
Menifee
Perris
Hemet
Corona
Temecula
Murrieta
Moreno
Valley
Jurupa
Valley
Lake
Elsinore
Beaumont
Wildomar
San
Jacinto
Norco
Calimesa
Eastvale
Canyon
Lake
Oceanside
tana
Yucaipa
Highland
Redlands
Bermardino
San
Loma
Linda
Grand
Terrace
Colton
Irvine
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
MissionViejo
Lake
Forest
Clemente
San
Laguna
Niguel
Aliso
Viejo
San Juan
Capistrano
a
Laguna
Hills
Rancho
Santa
Margarita
Orange
Laguna
Woods
Lake Elsinore
Diamond Valley Lake
Lake
Perris
Lake Mathews
Vail Lake
Skinner Reservoir
Santiago
Reservoir
Railroad
Canyon
Reservoir
San Bernardino
International Airport
Hemet-Ryan Airport
Perris Valley Airport
Riverside Municipal Airport
French Valley Airport
Flabob Airport
Corona Municipal Airport
Redlands Municipal Airport
Community Airpark Fallbrook
March
Air
Reserve
Base
15 10
5 215
10 215
15 15
15 5
215
10 60
79 74
79 76
74 73
261
241
133
210
38 74
79 San Bernardino National Forest
Cleveland National Forest
Lake Perris State Recreation
Area
Limestone
Regional Park
Canyon
Oneill
Regional
Park
Prado
Regional
Park
Palomar Mountain State Park
Santa Ana River
Regional Park
Kabian
County
Park
Jurupa Hills
Regional Park
Bogart
County
Park
Salt Creek
Corridor
onal Park
Yucaipa
Regional
Park
California Citrus
State Historic Park
Guajome Park
emente
Beach
San Onofre
State Beach
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Double
Butte
Park
Lake Skinner
Recreation Area
ark
Orange
County
Park
Hartford
Springs
Reserve
Camp Pendleton
Marine Corpe Base

Major Highways
Railroads
City of MorenoValley
Cities
Water
Airports
Parks and Open Space

N.T.S.

FIGURE 1: Regional Location Map
SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT wl SA iand 1 /" IClickmonga ICT _ Rilled
LST | adi — 66 r
/ 2 fing ol > 1 Redlands MunicipalAirport lf “4
wu oeuy I a Ag
| DN &
Tl
!
g
&
0 £3 Cucamnga-Gulsa Regional Pa IES i 0 4 38 z = a” y 1 Yucaipa IC] fario Pp Fontarla a . -Regional y | Dntari Jlupa Hills : 3
\ J “~~ Joandl sort x ns | 0 eH RG \ EAN RIVERSIDECOUNTY TY ¥ : rand a or p Lb A Terrace. N______ a, * IAN - H . Ti ro 4 {SAN BERNARRING, COUNTY.

A COUN 83 . . RIVERSIDECOUNTY
. fall Flabob Altpart ors oY] N a CF Fohiport |.” by/ ox Springspd II vY TI - Calime tw y = Ana Ri ountain wha ya SL { Ehstval RegionsPark. Reserve SL. Ly \ ae Gg) dei

1.4 A Li ©. Morer No
. eed] Valley "
j A Citrus : 3
cate Wlgaric ic Park Par. ami Alr i ’ i. ¥ ~
Base A Lake Perris
- + 4 State Recreatiol . ha | te refd Area i 4
zs 4 ol "Lake
a Cr
: . A A LakeMathews
o J oy EE . Hartford © TT ; ~S LAN La. . = . .
- R BEET & A » of ; rve ye
XY said “ ot PR . PRY 2 Santiagd 1554 Ce - a lop
Reservoir== ©" 4 - J Pago =
1 Tn . Af ed -— cm al TS DP § B Tee =r SI 7A ws Te PIE SO PerrisVd ! . ! ¥ p - 4 .
ia n
in ‘ [A PE
133 ? 5
Of PB rk ° Sans ee 1) Aa + DiamondValleyLake L—
ark « . . sr Se =
4 N 1) | ay pe [24 . - SE B . - Cr _
L2 el ~3 (ole ¥ : Lay, oO a - = 2 i
iso 4 “Skinner Reservoir) pe J ’
ie [Er N—
- N § Airport
; “ Pd R M Bb ¥ ; Vaz S Rd
X a. » 1 yr fo s on rv. 3 ANE n juan att nef a
= apistrano =F To. 3 Dana P Temelula © ail Lake 4 Paint NS - J; 3} Ny BRC b Doheny State Beach J AEgSIDECOUNTY Foy
San Clemente’ . ~ ] & Po
State Beach Les Lo g fd . Ap
Bais , dt) 25 rl (| com Major Highways N\ / Ee re A J ghway! ., ~ ar. A T ht a san One fi . rs 4: { X 2) & oh j State Beach ‘. . Camp Béndleton I E , —+—+ Railroads I Marine Tope Base ) hw 40 1
HE 3 N | Fall h . P acl fi C R Community Apart -\! "qo | Fo City of Moreno Valley Ocean BE OE aa Cities f] , . \ = 4 ;
’ ! = SIE IY Water
Ee - co |
; Tay B . i
. VES z N Parks and Open Space
ga p aE Vi
- - TTT f . S\! 3 -~ ; | Counties jome . 7 Fd i Sv fee
& FIGURE1: Regional Location Map
N.TS SUPPORTINGMOVAL2040CIRCULATIONELEMENTUPDATE, TRUCKROUTEORDINANCE,ANDTRUCKROUTESMAPPROJECT Kimley»Horn 263
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red
al nds Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area
San Timoteo
Canyon

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm
Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto R

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

WORLD LOGISTICS PARKWAY
N Perris Blvd
¯ 0 0.5 1 2 Miles
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from existing Truck Routes Legend
City of Moreno Valley
Sphere of Influence
Disadvantaged Community (SB
535, SB 1000)
Existing City Truck Routes
National Network Route
2040 Land Use
R1 Residential
R2 Residential
RR Rural Residential
R3 Residential
R5 Residential
R10 Residential
R15 Residential
R20 Residential
R30 Residential
HR Hillside Residential
DC Downtown Center
CEMU Center Mixed Use
COMU Corridor Mixed Use
C Commercial
R/O Residential Office
HO/C Highway Office/
Commercial
O Office
BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
BF Business Flex
P Public
OS Parks/Open Space
FP Floodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 ft from
Existing Truck Routes)
K-12 School
Residential Care
Hospital and Clinic
Child Care
FIGURE 2: Existing Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT — r |
-— Mountai Mou =
rs EL CASCO
2 5 »
h & San Timoteo
[4 H Canyon = . RECHE, CY Ch YY pm| “onrol 4 = = _ T Tal, Norton — ol 3 HH T Younglove ¥ = 2 IN fi, +=! Reserve
een BAX SM SL [ i Sycamore SUNNY EADTBLE pin g - Canyon > al py - Te = - ~ EY Wilderness Park S CX 5% Ne d = FUCAYPTUSIAE ES
y £0 00 He is: :
- Bx 0 O78 BRINE. EI po — 2 2 a
7 ESE NON dE ARES Giz 25 E
ZEW
2 A De i 0g 3 RI
/\ AllEssANDRO BLVD, wo rea Ren A hemmmem z
E Alessandro Blvd nl Al + . TE gs =r ui - LE]
x,” Vv ] A acts ave’ pA A)
] HC ~~
Z \ JOHN FKENNEDY,D v 5 hell bl SA :
4 Be = AN °, hye IE >
» March Air \¢ Foe caicd RY
an Bivd Reserve Base eo g= OR
qa
\ x =, CER Lake Perris
! Of eg State
- £ 21Heki' Recreation Area
= ional Indian Museum
Laka _—
Legend
[1 City of MorenoValley [1 RR Rural Residential Il CEMU Center Mixed Use Hl PPublic V/) Sphere of Influence [1 R3 Residential Il COMU Corridor MixedUse Il OSParks/OpenSpace va) DisadvantagedCommunity (SB [__] R5 Residential Hl CCommercial Il FPFloodplain 535, SB 1000) Hl R10 Residential R/O Residential Office Sensitive |Receptors (1,000ft from 5 == Existing City Truck Routes Bl Ri5 Residential gm O/C Highway Office/ ing Truck Routes) 2 = National Network Route I R20 Residential Commercial ® K-12 School 3 2040 Land Use I R30 Residential Hl O Office A Residential Care > [1 R1 Residential HR Hillside Residential cl BP Business Park/Light A Hospital and Clinic ® i i Industrial i
[1 R2 Residential Il DC Downtown Center A Child Care 0 05 1 Il BFBusinessFlex
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD),CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from existing Truck Routes 2 Miles
I I
Morongi
Golf'clu
C/
N
A
FIGURE2: ExistingTruck Routes and Sensitive ReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet SUPPORTINGMOVAL2040CIRCULATIONELEMENTUPDATE,TRUCKROUTEORDINANCE,ANDTRUCKROUTESMAPPROJECT Kimley»Horn 264
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red al nds Blvd
Alessandro Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy
Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
60 10
Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto Riv

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

EUCALYPTUS AVE
*World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes, Exhibit 3-11: Truck Routes, September 2014. Streets B, E, and F have not been constructed, but will be upon development of the World Logistics Center.

STREET E STREET F

STREET B
FIGURE 3: Proposed Truck Routes and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT -— _ y Box Springs Moun - Res Tg, EL CASCO
an EF
I) " & [| 3 a RECH v.
ig CIRN,N j= Teaon rol; = | T1013
a5 Fs Hi fii !
| ~ EC : == i + <Q 4
] 5 NUN Rr | -- eppa lll > CC E] | Sycamore a at = : Pht ~ = 2 a yy Wilderness Park >] KK 3 edi = SEED ears STR Pa 4Wi >< 2 FUCADRIUSAYE H 5
. vo Rg Ua WAS aX; =X Bt STREETEv SAN - KX Fs STH XIX AE i CZ | OU ana me Xo A VE AY ed 7 8-3 2 E = [Pa Wa A A . ES NEE fi E 2 EEY Ng WS." |" 57 AlEssaNDrRo BUD 2% mT 9
E Alessandro Blvd S382 a ro bl < —
CACTUS,CTUS AVE 2 rd OX ~ <= ’ 3 LOA KOR
% al ES; Z JOHN, KENNEDY.D @ 1
e. ®, £ i 8 o |
> hm YK] 2, ae HEP
a . : } wD » March Air 1 ASIEYCOLLEGE
n BIvd Reserve Base Smo OR &
i i a
\ 5 Lake Perris Ny ee State
N HS a'i Heki' Recreation Area
= ional Indian Museum
[1 City of MorenoValley 2040 Land Use [1 HRHillsideResidential Il BFBusinessFlex |, [ZA Sphereof Influence [1] R1 Residential I DC Downtown Center I PPublic by xa Disadvantaged Community [1 R2Residential (SB
535,SB1000)
= Remaining Truck Routes World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes == National Network Route [J RRRuralResidential
[J R3Residential
[J R5 Residential
Hl R10Residential
Hl R15Residential
Hl R20Residential
Il R30 Residential
Il CEMU Center Mixed Use
Il COMU Corridor Mixed Use
Hl CCommercial R/O Residential Office 1c a offs
Hl O Office BP Business Park/Light
Industrial
Il OSParks/OpenSpace
Hl FPFloodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 Ft from
Remaining Truck Routes) ® K-12 School A Residential Care A Hospital and Clinic A Child Care *South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Remaining Truck Routes Hansen Ave
Norton
*World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes, Exhibit 3-11: Truck Routes, September 2014. Streets B, E, and F have not been constructed, but will be upon development of the World Logistics Center.

Morongo Younglove » Reserve Golf’Clut
CA
0 05 1 2 Miles

I I I I
FIGURE3: ProposedTruck Routes and Sensitive ReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet SUPPORTINGMOVAL2040CIRCULATIONELEMENTUPDATE,TRUCKROUTEORDINANCE,ANDTRUCKROUTESMAPPROJECT Kimley»Horn 265
Van Buren Blvd
E Alessandro Blvd
Trautwein Rd
60 215
215
March Air
Reserve Base
Box Springs
Mountain
Reserve
Sycamore
Canyon
Wilderness Park

M ORE NO

V ALLEY

VAL VERDE
MEAD
VALLEY
Red
al nds Blvd
Iris Ave
Nason St
Heacock St
60 60
60 Norton
Younglove
Reserve
Lake Perris
State
Recreation Area
San Timoteo
Canyon

EL CASCO
Perris Valley Storm
Drain
Lak e
Perri s
Ramona Expy Ramona Expy
Ramona Expy Hansen Ave
215
215
Ya'i Heki'
Regional Indian
Museum
NUEVO
10 Morongo
Golf Club

EDEN HOT

SPRINGS
EDEN

CALIMESA
San Jacinto R

CASA LOMA

COLLEGE
DR

ALESSANDRO BLVD
MORENO

BEACH DR
DAY ST

SUNNYMEAD BLVD HEACOCK ST

PERRIS BLVD

PIGEON PASS RD

N PERRIS BLVD

FREDERICK ST

REDLANDS BLVD

LASSELLE ST

NASON ST

IRIS AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

CACTUS AVE
RECHE

CANYON RD
RECHE

VISTA DR

JOHN F KENNEDY DR

EUCALYPTUS AVE
*World Logistics Center Specific Plan Truck Routes, Exhibit 3-11: Truck Routes, September 2014. These truck routes are currently not developed but will be upon completion of World Logistics Center.

FIGURE 4: Proposed Existing Truck Routes to Be Eliminated and Sensitive Receptors Within 1,000 Feet SUPPORTING MOVAL 2040 CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE, TRUCK ROUTE ORDINANCE, AND TRUCK ROUTES MAP PROJECT

EL CASCO
San Timoteo Canyon
\
4 . - Box Springs Mountail
| GE Res =
2 5, g Bb~ 2 » ga
[| 3
a = RECHE, 2 5 jou TEavon rol ) = h 2X > A J Ll Lal
if 4 | EE ANZ rr ng 4] Ml, ad
=) oN VN - v h
EY SET El [ Sycamore forks Pe TA in|
Canyon Ex oy Zo SF FucaLYBTUS AVE 2 Wilderness Park CK DE — = Ee) py RQ, 5 FUTAPTUSE a 3 2 2 A ) a ht P) wo a E) fd]
] A 2 £ ES > £ Em 1 3 z w — !& x KX we Of (] %€") I) 8 SE % (20 cha 4 MO1b [02 BY SUCNie 2 fae SEI P= gg < 5] Ye Ny id 2 AlESSANDROBLUD, 2 x x <8 E Alessandro Blvd = Sq 3 Br ry El i - L CL. 15 Ne CN / hel A acs ave’ Lok £FSF AS oN £2) < HU 2 EH ' 2 \ JOHN, F'KENNEDY.D! o ®. 3 FQ, ~ Sr 3 Soh Sl Fu
2 hm SAS] 5 Lave MHEP a } re <0 Wl (15 » March Air | ASE COLLEGE a DR n Bd Reserve Base \ % -3
| 2
\ 5 Lake Perris ES State
ns wn! . =z a'i Heki' Recreation Area
== ional Indian Museum
Legend
1 City of MorenoValley
[// Sphereof Influence
=x] Disadvantaged Community (SB
535,SB1000)
_ Proposed Existing Truck Route To Be Eliminated = National Network Route 2040 Land Use
[1 R1Residential
[1 R2 Residential
[1 RRRuralResidential
[J R3 Residential
[J R5 Residential
I R10Residential
I R15 Residential
I R20Residential
Hl R30Residential
[J HRHillsideResidential
Il DCDowntown Center
Il CEMUCenter MixedUse
Il COMUCorridor Mixed Use
Hl CCommercial R/O Residential Office a
Hl © Office BP Business Park/Light _- Industrial
ll BFBusinessFlex
Hl P Public
Il 0S Parks/OpenSpace
Il FPFloodplain
Sensitive Receptors (1,000 ft from
Existing Truck Routes) K-12 School Residential Care Hospital and Clinic >> Child Care ro Py
*South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), CEQA Air Quality Handbook, 1993. Sensitive Receptors are displayed 1,000 feet from Existing Truck Routes \ BAY UssueH
Norton Younglove Reserve
0 05 1
I
2 Miles
>a
Morongo fo
Golfclut
=
CA
5 FIGURE4: Proposed ExistingTruck Routes to BeEliminated and Sensitive ReceptorsWithin 1,000 Feet SUPPORTINGMOVAL2040CIRCULATIONELEMENTUPDATE,TRUCKROUTEORDINANCE,ANDTRUCKROUTESMAPPROJECT Kimley»Horn 266
2024 Revised Final Environmental Impact Report Summary
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 15 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 4 2024 REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

SUMMARY
The environmental impact findings of the 2024 RFEIR are summarized below. These findings are also included in the summary table provided at the beginning of each environmental topic area included in Section 5, Environmental Impact Analysis, of this Addendum.

No Impact: The 2024 RFEIR determined that no impact would occur with respect to the following environmental topic areas below.
• Aesthetics (Impact 5.1-a)
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Impacts 5.2-c and 5.2-d) • Mineral Resources (Impact 5.12-b)
Less Than Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR identified less than significant impacts in the following environmental topic areas below.
• Aesthetics (Impacts 5.1-a, 5.1-c, and 5.1-d)
• Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Impact 5.2-b)
• Air Quality (Impact 5.3-d)
• Biological Resources (Impacts 5.4-d through 5.4-f)
• Energy (Impacts 5.6-a and 5.6-b)
• Geology and Soils (Impacts 5.7-a through 5.7-d)
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Impacts 5.8-a and 5.8-b)
• Hazards and Hazardous Materials (Impacts 5.9-a through 5.9-g) • Hydrology and Water Quality (Impact 5.10-a through 5.10-e) • Land Use and Planning (Impacts 5.11-a and 5.11-b)
• Mineral Resources (Impact 5.12-a)
• Noise (Impacts 5.13-a [railroad and stationary noise], 5.13-b [railroad and stationary noise], 5.13- c)
• Population and Housing (Impacts 5.14-a and 5.14-b)
• Public Services and Recreation (Impacts 5.15-a through 5.15-c) • Transportation (Impacts 5.16-a, 5.16-c, and 5.16-d)
• Utilities and Service Systems (Impacts 5.17-a through 5.17-e) • Wildfire (Impacts 5.18-a through 5.18-d)
2024 Revised Final Environmental Impact Report Summary
4 2024 REVISED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

No Impact: The 2024 RFEIR determined that no impact would occur with respect to the following environmental topic areas below.
e Aesthetics (Impact 5.1-a)
e Agricultural and Forestry Resources {Impacts 5.2-c and 5.2-d) e Mineral Resources (Impact 5.12-b)
Less Than Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR identified less than significant impacts in the following environmental topic areas below.
e Aesthetics (Impacts 5.1-a, 5.1-c, and 5.1-d)
e Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Impact 5.2-b)
e Air Quality (Impact 5.3-d)
e Biological Resources (Impacts 5.4-d through 5.4-f)
e Energy (Impacts 5.6-a and 5.6-b)
e Geology and Soils (Impacts 5.7-a through 5.7-d)
eo Greenhouse GasEmissions {Impacts 5.8-a and 5.8-b)
e Hazards and Hazardous Materials (Impacts 5.9-a through 5.9-g) e Hydrology and Water Quality {Impact 5.10-a through 5.10-e) e land Use and Planning (Impacts 5.11-a and 5.11-b)
e Mineral Resources (Impact 5.12-a)
e Noise (Impacts 5.13-a [railroad and stationary noise], 5.13-b [railroad and stationary noise], 5.13- c)
e Population and Housing (Impacts 5.14-a and 5.14-b)
e Public Services and Recreation (Impacts 5.15-a through 5.15-c) e Transportation (Impacts 5.16-a, 5.16-c, and 5.16-d)
e Utilities and Service Systems {Impacts 5.17-a through 5.17-e) e Wildfire (Impacts 5.18-a through 5.18-d)
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 15 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 267
2024 Revised Final Environmental Impact Report Summary
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 16 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Less Than Significant Impact with Incorporation of Mitigation: The 2024 RFEIR identified impacts that could be mitigated to lessthan significantlevels with incorporation of mitigationmeasuresin the following environmental topic areas below.
• Air Quality (Impact 5.3-c [operation])
• Geology and Soils (Impact 5.7-e)
• Noise (Impact 5.13-b [construction])
Significant and Unavoidable Impact: The 2024 RFEIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts with implementation of the Project in following environmental topic areas below. • Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Impacts 5.2-a and 5.2-e) • Air Quality (Impacts 5.3-a. 5.3-b, and 5.3-c [construction]) • Biological Resources (Impacts 5.4-a through 5.4-c)
• Cultural Resources (Impacts 5.5-a through 5.5-d)
• Noise (Impact 5.13-a [traffic and construction noise]) • Transportation (Impact 5.16-b)
2024 Revised Final Environmental Impact Report Summary
Less Than Significant Impact with Incorporation of Mitigation: The 2024 RFEIR identified impacts that could be mitigated to less than significant levels with incorporation of mitigation measures in the following environmental topic areas below.
e Air Quality (Impact 5.3-c [operation])
eo Geology and Soils {Impact 5.7-e)
e Noise (Impact 5.13-b [construction])
Significant and Unavoidable Impact: The 2024 RFEIR identified significant and unavoidable impacts with implementation of the Project in following environmental topic areas below. e Agricultural and Forestry Resources {Impacts 5.2-a and 5.2-e) e Air Quality (Impacts 5.3-a. 5.3-b, and 5.3-c [construction]) e Biological Resources (Impacts 5.4-a through 5.4-c)
e Cultural Resources (Impacts 5.5-a through 5.5-d)
e Noise (Impact 5.13-a [traffic and construction noise]) e Transportation (Impact 5.16-b)
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 16 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 268
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 17 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
The scope of the City’s review of the Project is set forth in CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. This review is limited to evaluating the environmental effects associated with the Project when compared to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project as described in the 2024 RFEIR. This Addendum also reviews new information, based on the subsequent review of vested development entitlements, which warrants the need to eliminate and/or realign some existing truck routes,add segments of Eucalyptus Avenue east of Redlands Boulevard and Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60, and acknowledge that several future interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses. This new information is of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the 2024 RFEIR was certified. This evaluation includes a determination as to whether the changes proposed for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in any new significant impacts or more severe significant impact.

Although CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 does not stipulate the format or content of an Addendum, the topical areas evaluated in the 2024 RFEIR were used as guidance for this Addendum. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) states that “A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's findings on the Project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.” This comparative analysis provides the City with the factual basis for determining whether any changes to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, any changes in circumstances, or any new information since the 2024 RFEIR was certified would require additional environmental review or preparation of a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the City has determined, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, that implementation of the Project does not propose substantial changes from what was studied and reviewed for the 2024 RFEIR, no substantial changes in circumstances would occur which would require major revisions to the 2024 RFEIR, and no new information of substantial importance has been revealed since the certification of 2024 RFEIR that would result in either new significant effects or an increase in the severity of previously analyzed significant effects.

Again, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was adopted as a part of the 2024 RFEIR that minimized impacts associated with the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. The relevant and previously adopted 2024 RFEIR MMRP will be imposed as conditions of the Project. The MMRP is contained in Appendix A.

Environmental Impact Analysis
5 ENVIRONMENTALIMPACT ANALYSIS
The scope of the City’s review of the Project is set forth in CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. This review is limited to evaluating the environmental effects associated with the Project when compared to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project as described in the 2024 RFEIR. This Addendum also reviews new information, based on the subsequent review of vested development entitlements, which warrants the need to eliminate and/or realign some existing truck routes,add segments of Eucalyptus Avenue east of Redlands Boulevard and Redlands Boulevard between Eucalyptus Avenue and SR-60, and acknowledge that several future interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses. This new information is of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable due diligence at the time the 2024 RFEIR was certified. This evaluation includes a determination as to whether the changes proposed for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in any new significant impacts or more severe significant impact.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 17 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 269
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 18 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.1 Aesthetics
The table below summarizes the conclusions of this section.

Environmental Issue Area
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring
New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect on a scenic vista?
Less than
significant No No No None
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not
limited to trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic
Highway?
No Impact No No No None
c) If in a non-urbanized area,
substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of public views of the
site and its surroundings?
(Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). If the
project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic
quality?
Less than
significant No No No None
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.1.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
In summary, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that impacts regarding scenic vistas, visual character, and glare impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. There would be no impact regarding scenic resources within a State scenic highway because there are no State-designated or eligible scenic highways within the Planning Area for the 2024 RFEIR. Compliance with local plans; the City’s Municipal Code, requiring standard design measures as well as lighting and landscaping requirements; Title 24 of the California Building Standards Code, which serves as the basis for the design and construction of buildings in California; and the 2024 GPU policies would be required for future development under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. Therefore, with consistency with all relevant regulations, impacts related to aesthetics would be less than significant.

Environmental Impact Analysis
51 Aesthetics
The table below summarizes the conclusions of this section.

New New
Circumstances | Information
New or Involving New Requiring
Conclusion More or More New
in 2024 Severe Severe Analysis or Mitigation
EnvironmentalIssue Area RFEIR Impacts? Impacts? Verification? Measures Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse Less than
Lo LL No No No None
effect on a scenic vista? significant
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not
limited to trees, rock
No Impact No No No None
outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State Scenic
Highway?
c) If in a non-urbanized area,
substantially degrade the
existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings?
(Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly Less than No No No None
accessible vantage point). If the significant
project is in an urbanized area,
would the project conflict with
applicable zoning and other
regulations governing scenic
quality?
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare which Less than
would adversely affect day or | significant
nighttime views in the area?
No No No None

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 18 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 270
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 19 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.1.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Threshold (b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? Threshold (c) Would the project, if in a non-urbanized area, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Threshold (d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact
According to the 2024 RFEIR, impacts regarding scenic vistas, visual character, and glare impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact scenic vistas, visual character, or glare.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any of the 2024 GPU policies or programs specific to aesthetics or scenic vistas.

No aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to aesthetics, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR:

No mitigation measures are required.

Environmental Impact Analysis
Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
None identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.1.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Threshold (b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State ScenicHighway? Threshold (c¢) Would the project, if in a non-urbanized area, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Threshold (d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact
According to the 2024 RFEIR, impacts regarding scenic vistas, visual character, and glare impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact scenic vistas, visual character, or glare.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to aesthetics, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR:

No mitigation measures are required.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 19 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 271
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 20 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.1.3 Conclusion
The Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to aesthetics than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR. No new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant aesthetics impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.

Environmental Impact Analysis

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 20 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 272
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 21 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions of this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Will the Project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland or Farmland
of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No None
b) Conflict with existing zoning
for agricultural use or a
Williamson Act contract?
Less than
significant No No No None
c) Conflict with existing zoning
for, or cause rezoning of, forest
land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by
Government Code section
51104(g))?
No impact No No No None
d) Result in the loss of forest
land or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
No impact No No No None
e) Involve other changes in the
existing environment which,
due to their location or nature,
could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural
use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No None
Environmental Impact Analysis

5.2 Agricultural and Forestry Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions of this section.

New New
New or Circumstances Information
Conclusion More Involving New or | RequiringNew
in 2024 Severe MoreSevere Analysis or Mitigation
EnvironmentalIssue Areas RFEIR Impacts? Impacts? Verification? Measures In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Will the Project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland or Farmland
of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the | Significant
maps prepared pursuant to the and No No No None
Farmland Mapping and | unavoidable
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency,
to non-agricultural use?
b}) Conflict with existing zoning Less than
for agricultural use or a - No No No None
Williamson Act contract? significant
c) Conflict with existing zoning
for, or cause rezoning of, forest
land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources No impact No No No None
Code section 4526), or
timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by
Government Code section
51104(g))?
d)} Result in the loss of forest
land or conversion of forest No impact No No No None
land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the
existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, Significant
could result in conversion of and No No No None
Farmland, to non-agricultural | unavoidable
use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 21 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 273
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 22 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.2.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would impact Prime Farmland and Farmland of Local Importance within the proposed Concept Areas. The 2024 RFEIR determined that the continued development of properties under the land use designations that would remain unchanged would also have the potential to convert additional land designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance or Unique Farmland to non-farming uses. Although the conversion of Farmland was anticipated and evaluated under the general plan prior to the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, the 2006 General Plan EIR, some vacant Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program designations remain that could be converted to non-agricultural uses, which would be considered significant.

The 2024 RFEIR determined that there would be no conflicts with agricultural zoning as the City does not have any exclusive agricultural zones and the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project does not include any rezoning.

Additionally, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project did not propose any land use changes within or adjacent to any land subject to a Williamson Act Contract. Therefore, impacts related to agricultural zoning and Williamson Act Contracts would be less than significant. Additionally, no impacts would occur in regard to forest zoning and forest land.

Lastly, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would intensify uses within the Planning Area in a manner that would reduce the feasibility of agricultural production.

Furthermore, the continued development of land under the land use designations that would remain unchanged could also indirectly affect the feasibility of agricultural production through continued urbanization. Therefore, the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would potentially result in indirect conversion of potential farmland resources to non-agricultural uses, which would be considered a significant impact.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No feasible mitigation is identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

Lastly, the 2024 RFEIRconcluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would intensify uses within the Planning Area in a manner that would reduce the feasibility of agricultural production.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No feasible mitigation is identified in the 2024 RFEIR.

5.2.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to nonagricultural use? Threshold (b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
Threshold (c¢) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
Threshold {(d) Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to nonforest use? Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 22 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 274
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 23 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Threshold (e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

According to the 2024 RFEIR, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would impact Prime Farmland and Farmland of Local Importance within the Planning Area. Implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project does not propose any land use changes within or adjacent to a Williamson Act Contract.

Therefore, impacts related to agricultural zoning and Williamson Act Contracts would be less than significant. The City also does not possess any zoning classifications for forestland, timberland, or timberland production zones, nor does the Planning Area possess any forestland. Future development could accelerate the conversion of agricultural land. Implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would intensify uses within the Planning Area in a manner that would further reduce the feasibility of agricultural production. Furthermore, the continued development of land under the land use designations that would remain unchanged could also indirectly affect the feasibility of agricultural production through urbanization due to the introduction of a higher intensity land use.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance; would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact land within or adjacent to any land subject to a Williamson Act Contract; would not impact forest zoning or forest land; and would not affect the feasibility of agricultural production.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any 2024 GPU policies or programs specific to agriculture and forestry resources.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to agriculture and forestry resources, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Environmental Impact Analysis
Threshold (e) Would the project involve other changesin the existingenvironment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact:

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance; would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications that would impact land within or adjacent to any land subject to a Williamson Act Contract; would not impact forest zoning or forest land; and would not affect the feasibility of agricultural production.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any 2024 GPU policies or programs specific to agriculture and forestry resources.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to agriculture and forestry resources, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 23 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 275
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 24 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.2.3 Conclusion
The Project would not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to agriculture and forestry resources than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR. No new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant agriculture and forestry resources impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.

Environmental Impact Analysis

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 24 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 276
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 25 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.3 Air Quality
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue
Areas
Conclusion in
2024 RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Will the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Significant and
unavoidable No No No
MM AQ-1
through
MM AQ-5d
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is
non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality
standard?
Significant and
unavoidable No No No
MM AQ-1
MM AQ-2
MM AQ-3
c) Expose sensitive
receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
Significant and
unavoidable
(construction);
Less than
significant with
mitigation
incorporated
(operation)
No No No
MM AQ-4
MM AQ-5a
MM AQ-5b
MM AQ-5c
MM AQ-5d
d) Result in other
emissions (such as those
leading to odors)
adversely affecting a
substantial number of
people?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.3.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the buildout under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) because it would increase vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per service population when compared to existing conditions, resulting in significant and unavoidable transportation impacts related to VMT. However, at a programmatic level of analysis, there are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce air quality impacts associated with development facilitated by the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project. As such, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not be consistent with the AQMP, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable.

New New
New or Circumstances Information
More Involving New or | RequiringNew
EnvironmentalIssue Conclusion in Severe More Severe Analysis or Mitigation Areas 2024 RFEIR Impacts? Impacts? Verification? Measures Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Will the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct cp MM AQ-1
. . Significant and
implementation of the unavoidable No No No through
applicable air quality plan? MM AQ-5d
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for
which the roject regionis | Significant and MM AQ-1
. . No No No MM AQ-2
non-attainment under an unavoidable
. MM AQ-3
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality
standard?
c) Expose sensitive | Significant and
receptors to substantial unavoidable ollutantconcentrations? (construction); MM AQ-4 Less than MM AQ-5a
significant with No No No MM AQ-5b
mitigation MM AQ-3c
. MM AQ-5d
incorporated
(operation)
d) Result in other
emissions (such as those
leading to odors) Less than No No No None
adversely affecting a significant
substantial number of
people?

The 2024 RFEIR also determined that construction and operations associated with future development that would be accommodated under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project could generate both short-term (construction) and long-term (operations) emissions in excess of the South Coast Air Quality Management Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 25 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 277
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 26 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report District’s (SCAQMD) threshold criteria. For short-term emissions, implementing MM AQ-1 through MM AQ-5 and complying with the 2024 GPU goals and policies would reduce construction-related air pollutant emissions. However, individual projects could implement these mitigation measures and still exceed the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds. Therefore, the 2024 RFEIR construction-related regional air quality impacts of developments that would be accommodated by the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would remain significant and unavoidable. For long-term operations, MM AQ-5, in addition to the 2024 GPU goals and policies, would reduce air pollutant emissions. The conditions and policies covering topics such as expansion of the pedestrian and bicycle networks, promotion of public and active transit, and support to increase building energy efficiency and energy conservation would also reduce criteria air pollutants within the City. However, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project.

Similarly, localized construction and operational emissions associated with future development could exceed the SCAQMD’s localized significance thresholds (LST) and health risk thresholds. Cumulative development within the City would exceed the regional significance thresholds; therefore, implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project could contribute to an increase in health effects in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) until the attainment standards are met in the Basin. As such, the 2024 RFEIR concluded that the regional air quality would remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation implemented. MM AQ-5 would also result in a reduction of localized construction- and operation-related criteria air pollutant emissions to the extent logistically and technologically feasible. However, because existing sensitive receptors may be near construction activities and large emitters of on-site operationrelated criteria air pollutant emissions generated by individual development projects accommodated by the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, construction and operation emissions generated by such projects have the potential to exceed SCAQMD’s LSTs. Overall, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Regarding health risk, implementation of MM AQ-5 also has the potential to reduce construction and operational health risk; however, construction and operation health risk generated by projects under the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would still have the potential to exceed SCAQMD’s health risk. Overall, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable for construction risk and less than significant with mitigation for operational health risk.

Regarding odor, the 2024 RFEIR found that impacts related to construction and operational odor impacts would be less than significant with compliance with 2024 GPU policies and SCAQMD Rules 402 and 1113.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
At a programmatic level of analysis, there are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce air quality impacts associated with development facilitated by the 2024 GPU. Future construction and operational emissions would conflict with implementation of the AQMP. Impacts remain significant and unavoidable.

MM AQ-1 Proposed development projects that are not exempt from CEQA shall have construction and operational air quality impacts analyzed using the latest available air emissions model, or other analytical method determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. The results of the air quality impact analysis shall be included in the development project’s CEQA documentation. To address potential localized impacts, the air quality analysis shall Environmental Impact Analysis
District's (SCAQMD) threshold criteria. For short-term emissions, implementing MM AQ-1 through MM AQ-5 and complying with the 2024 GPU goals and policies would reduce construction-related air pollutant emissions. However, individual projects could implement these mitigation measures and still exceed the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds. Therefore, the 2024 RFEIR construction-related regional air quality impacts of developments that would be accommodated by the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would remain significant and unavoidable. For long-term operations, MM AQ-5, in addition to the 2024 GPU goals and policies, would reduce air pollutant emissions. The conditions and policies covering topics such as expansion of the pedestrian and bicycle networks, promotion of public and active transit, and support to increase building energy efficiency and energy conservation would also reduce criteria air pollutants within the City. However, impacts would remain significant and unavoidable due to the magnitude of the overall land use development associated with the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project.

MM AQ-1 Proposed development projects that are not exempt from CEQA shall have construction and operational air quality impacts analyzed using the latest available air emissions model, or other analytical method determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. The results of the air quality impact analysis shall be included in the development project’s CEQA documentation. To address potential localized impacts, the air quality analysis shall Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 26 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 278
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 27 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report incorporate SCAQMD’s Localized Significance Threshold (LST) analysis or other appropriate analyses as determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. If such analyses identify potentially significant regional or local air quality impacts, the City shall require the incorporation of appropriate mitigation to reduce such impacts to the greatest extent feasible.

MM AQ-2 Applicants for future discretionary development projects which will generate construction-related fugitive dust emissions that exceed applicable thresholds shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable. The measures shall be included as notes on the grading and/or demolition plans:
• The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excess amounts of dust. • Pre-grading/excavation activities shall include watering the area to be graded or excavated before commencement of grading or excavation operations.

Application of watering (preferably reclaimed water, if available) should penetrate sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities. This measure can achieve PM10 reductions of 61 percent through application of water every three hours to disturbed areas.
• Fugitive dust produced during grading, excavation, and construction activities shall be controlled by the following activities: To reduce energy demand associated with potable water conveyance, future projects shall implement the following, as applicable:
o All trucks shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Section 23114. Covering loads and maintaining a freeboard height of 12 inches can reduce PM10 emissions by 91 percent.
o All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved on-site roadways, shall be treated to prevent fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, periodic watering at not less than three hourintervals, application of environmentally safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll-compaction as appropriate.

MM AQ-2 Applicants for future discretionary development projects which will generate construction-related fugitive dust emissions that exceed applicable thresholds shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable. The measures shall be included as notes on the grading and/or demolition plans:
eo The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations shall be minimized to prevent excess amounts of dust. e Pre-grading/excavation activities shall include watering the area to be graded or excavated before commencement of grading or excavation operations.

Application of watering (preferably reclaimed water, if available) should penetrate sufficiently to minimize fugitive dust during grading activities. This measure can achieve PM10 reductions of 61 percent through application of water every three hours to disturbed areas.
e Fugitive dust produced during grading, excavation, and construction activities shall be controlled by the following activities: To reduce energy demand associated with potable water conveyance, future projects shall implement the following, as applicable:
o All trucks shall be required to cover their loads as required by California Vehicle Section 23114. Covering loads and maintaining a freeboard height of 12 inches can reduce PM10 emissions by 91 percent.
o All graded and excavated material, exposed soil areas, and active portions of the construction site, including unpaved on-site roadways, shall be treated to prevent fugitive dust. Treatment shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, periodic watering at not less than three hour intervals, application of environmentally safe soil stabilization materials, and/or roll-compaction as appropriate.

Watering shall be done as often as necessary and reclaimed water shall be used whenever possible. Application of water every three hours to disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 61percent. e Graded and/or excavated inactive areas of the construction site shall be monitored at least weekly for dust stabilization. Soil stabilization methods, such as water and roll-compaction, and environmentally safe dust control materials, shall be periodically applied to portions of the construction site that are inactive for over four days. If no further grading or excavation operations are planned for the area, the area shall be seeded and watered Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 27 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 279
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 28 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report until grass growth is evident, or periodically treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants, to prevent excessive fugitive dust. Replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 5 percent. • Signs shall be posted on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. This measure can reduce associated PM10 emissions by 57 percent. • During periods of high winds (i.e., wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties; instantaneous wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour), all clearing, grading, earth moving, and excavation operations shall be curtailed to the degree necessary to prevent fugitive dust created by onsite activities and operations from being a nuisance or hazard off-site or onsite. The site superintendent/supervisor shall use his/her discretion in conjunction with SCAQMD when winds are excessive (above 25 miles per hour).
• Adjacent streets and roads shall be swept at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent streets and roads.
• Personnel involved in grading operations, including contractors and subcontractors, shall be required to wear respiratory protection in accordance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health regulations.

MM AQ-3 Applicants for future discretionary development projects that would generate construction-related emissions that exceed applicable thresholds, shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by the SCAQMD (in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook or otherwise), to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable to the project. The types of measures shall include but are not limited to:
• Construction haul truck operators for demolition debris and import/export of soil shall use trucks that meet CARB’s 2020 engine emissions standards of

0.01 grams per brake horsepower hour of particulate matter (PM) and 0.20 grams per brake horsepower-hour of NOx emissions. Operators shall maintain records of all trucks associated with project construction to document that each truck used meets these emission standards and shall provide these records prior to grading permit issuance to the City. • Construction vehicle idling shall be limited to five minutes as set forth in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Section 2449. Signs shall be posted in areas where they will be seen by vehicle operators stating idling time limits. This requirement shall be included on the plans. • Construction contractors shall utilize construction equipment that uses low polluting fuels (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) to the extent that they are available and feasible to use.

This requirement shall be included on the plans.

Environmental Impact Analysis
until grass growth is evident, or periodically treated with environmentally safe dust suppressants, to prevent excessive fugitive dust. Replacement of ground cover in disturbed areas can reduce PM10 emissions by 5 percent. e Signs shall be posted on-site limiting traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. This measure can reduce associated PM10 emissions by 57 percent. e During periods of high winds (i.e., wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties; instantaneous wind speeds exceeding 25 miles per hour), all clearing, grading, earth moving, and excavation operations shall be curtailed to the degree necessary to prevent fugitive dust created by onsite activities and operations from being a nuisance or hazard off-site or onsite. The site superintendent/supervisor shall use his/her discretion in conjunction with SCAQMD when winds are excessive (above 25 miles per hour).
eo Adjacent streets and roads shall be swept at least once per day, preferably at the end of the day, if visible soil material is carried over to adjacent streets and roads.
eo Personnel involved in grading operations, including contractors and subcontractors, shall be required to wear respiratory protection in accordance with California Division of Occupational Safety and Health regulations.

MM AQ-3 Applicants for future discretionary development projects that would generate construction-related emissions that exceed applicable thresholds, shall include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by the SCAQMD (in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook or otherwise), to the extent technically and logistically feasible and applicable to the project. The types of measures shall include but are not limited to:
e Construction haul truck operators for demolition debris and import/export of soil shall use trucks that meet CARB’s 2020 engine emissions standards of

0.01 grams per brake horsepower hour of particulate matter (PM) and 0.20 grams per brake horsepower-hour of NOx emissions. Operators shall maintain records of all trucks associated with project construction to document that each truck used meets these emission standards and shall provide these records prior to grading permit issuance to the City. e Construction vehicle idling shall be limited to five minutes as set forth in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Section 2449. Signs shall be posted in areas where they will be seen by vehicle operators stating idling time limits. This requirement shall be included on the plans. eo Construction contractors shall utilize construction equipment that uses low polluting fuels (i.e., compressed natural gas, liquid petroleum gas, and unleaded gasoline) to the extent that they are available and feasible to use.

This requirement shall be included on the plans.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 28 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 280
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 29 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report • Heavy duty diesel-fueled equipment shall use low NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is available and feasible to use. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Construction contractors shall use electricity from power poles rather than temporary gasoline or diesel-powered generators, as technically and logistically feasible, or solar where available. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
• Construction contractors shall maintain construction equipment in good, properly tuned operating condition, as specified by the manufacturer, to minimize exhaust emissions. Documentation demonstrating that the equipment has been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications shall be shared with the City prior to grading permit issuance. • Construction contractors shall reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas, as technically and logistically feasible. This requirement shall be included on the plans.

MM AQ-4 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Localized Significance Threshold analysis shall be prepared for construction and operations. If the LST analysis determines that the established Localized Significance Thresholds for NOx, PM2.5, or PM10 would be exceeded, then modifications to construction equipment profiles, modifications to construction schedules, or additional pollution reduction measures shall be implemented to ensure that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded.

MM AQ-5a A project-specific Health Risk Assessment (HRA) shall be conducted for future development projects that would generate toxic air contaminants (TACs) within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. Consistent with Assembly Bill (AB) 98 and Senate Bill (SB) 415, logistics use facility projects within 900 feet of sensitive receptors to shall conduct an operational HRA. The HRA shall evaluate a project when unmitigated emissions are expected to meet or exceed per the following South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds:
• Carcinogens: Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 10 in one million. For cumulative cancer risk, the maximum exposed individual risk equals or exceeds significance thresholds established by SCAQMD. • Non‐Carcinogens: Emit toxic contaminants that equal or exceed 1 for the Maximally Exposed Individual.

If projects are found to exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds, mitigation, including but not limited to requiring heavy-duty trucks, forklifts and/or yard trucks to be zero-emission, forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes, installing photo-voltaic systems, running conduit for future electric truck charging, requiring all stand-by generators to be non-diesel, designing to LEED green building certifications, and improving vegetation and tree canopy for shade, shall be incorporated to reduce impacts Environmental Impact Analysis
MM AQ-4
MM AQ-5a
eo Heavy duty diesel-fueled equipment shall use low NOx diesel fuel to the extent that it is available and feasible to use. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
eo Construction contractors shall use electricity from power poles rather than temporary gasoline or diesel-powered generators, as technically and logistically feasible, or solar where available. This requirement shall be included on the plans.
e Construction contractors shall maintain construction equipment in good, properly tuned operating condition, as specified by the manufacturer, to minimize exhaust emissions. Documentation demonstrating that the equipment has been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications shall be shared with the City prior to grading permit issuance. eo Construction contractors shall reroute construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptor areas, as technically and logistically feasible. This requirement shall be included on the plans.

Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a Localized Significance Threshold analysis shall be prepared for construction and operations. If the LST analysis determines that the established Localized Significance Thresholds for NOx, PM2.5, or PM10 would be exceeded, then modifications to construction equipment profiles, modifications to construction schedules, or additional pollution reduction measures shall be implemented to ensure that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded.

A project-specific Health Risk Assessment (HRA) shall be conducted for future development projects that would generate toxic air contaminants (TACs) within 1,000 feet of sensitive receptors, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. Consistent with AssemblyBill (AB)98 and SenateBill (SB)415, logistics use facility projects within 900 feet of sensitive receptors to shall conduct an operational HRA. The HRA shall evaluate a project when unmitigated emissions are expected to meet or exceed per the following South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) thresholds:
e Carcinogens: Maximally Exposed Individual risk equals or exceeds 10 in one million. For cumulative cancer risk, the maximum exposed individual risk equals or exceeds significance thresholds established by SCAQMD. eo Non-Carcinogens: Emit toxic contaminants that equal or exceed 1 for the Maximally Exposed Individual.

If projects are found to exceed the SCAQMD’s thresholds, mitigation, including but not limited to requiring heavy-duty trucks, forklifts and/or yard trucks to be zero-emission, forbidding trucks from idling for more than three minutes, installing photo-voltaic systems, running conduit for future electric truck charging, requiring all stand-by generators to be non-diesel, designing to LEED green building certifications, and improving vegetation and tree canopy for shade, shall be incorporated to reduce impacts Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 29 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 281
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 30 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report to below SCAQMD thresholds. The HRA shall be submitted to the City Planning Department to demonstrate that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded prior to issuance of building permits for any future discretionary residential or residential mixeduse project.

MM AQ-5b The City of Moreno Valley shall create an abatement fund to subsidize air filtration and/or Heating, Ventilation, Air Condition (HVAC) systems for residents within 1,000 feet of the property line of any logistics use facility projects or within 1,000 feet of a dedicated truck route, thereby abating air quality impacts for the most impacted sensitive receptors. The City of Moreno Valley may choose to administer the abatement fund or designate its administration to a third party which will require an additional 10 percent administrative fee. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, all logistics use facility project applicants shall pay a one-time fee of $1,500 for each daily truck trip the logistics use facility project is estimated to induce.

MM AQ-5c All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following design and construction requirements shall be implemented, as applicable to the project:
• All logistics use facility projects shall be located at least 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors.
• All logistics use facility projects shall include a solid wall and/or a landscaped berm of at least 15 feet in height, separating the project and nearby sensitive receptors.
• All logisticfacility projects shall ensure that the project parking lots have at least 35 percent of the tree shade cover within 15 years of commencement of operations.
• All logistics use facility projects shall make at least 25 percent of passenger car vehicle parking electric vehicle (EV)-ready, with at least 15 percent of passenger parking spots equipped with Level 2 chargers. • All logistics use facility projects shall be equipped with EV ready conduits at each truck door or parking spot to support an EV charger and at least 50 percent of these shall be installed with fast chargers. • All logistics use facility projects that include refrigerated storage shall provide fully functional transportation refrigeration unit (TRU) plug-ins or similar electrical hookups at all truck loading bays or dock doors. • All logistics use facility projects totaling over 400,000 square feet in total footprint shall maintain a lounge for truck operators with amenities including restrooms, vending machines, and air conditioning.
• All construction equipment, including smaller equipment (such as hand tools and power washers), shall be zero emission if feasible and commercially available within the State of California. If it is not feasible to utilize zeroEnvironmental Impact Analysis to below SCAQMD thresholds. The HRA shall be submitted to the City Planning Department to demonstrate that none of the Thresholds will be exceeded prior to issuance of building permits for any future discretionary residential or residential mixeduse project.

MM AQ-5¢ All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following design and construction requirements shall be implemented, as applicable to the project:
eo All logistics use facility projects shall be located at least 1,000 feet from sensitive receptors.
e All logistics use facility projects shall include a solid wall and/or a landscaped berm of at least 15 feet in height, separating the project and nearby sensitive receptors.
eo All logisticfacility projects shall ensure that the project parking lots have at least 35 percent of the tree shade cover within 15 years of commencement of operations.
eo All logistics use facility projects shall make at least 25 percent of passenger car vehicle parking electric vehicle (EV)-ready, with at least 15 percent of passenger parking spots equipped with Level 2 chargers. eo All logistics use facility projects shall be equipped with EV ready conduits at each truck door or parking spot to support an EV charger and at least 50 percent of these shall be installed with fast chargers. eo Alllogistics use facility projects that include refrigerated storage shall provide fully functional transportation refrigeration unit (TRU) plug-ins or similar electrical hookups at all truck loading bays or dock doors. eo All logistics use facility projects totaling over 400,000 square feet in total footprint shall maintain a lounge for truck operators with amenities including restrooms, vending machines, and air conditioning.
e All construction equipment, including smaller equipment (such as hand tools and power washers), shall be zero emission if feasible and commercially available within the State of California. If it is not feasible to utilize zeroSupporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 30 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 282
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 31 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report emission construction equipment, or such equipment is not commercially available within the State of California, all such construction equipment shall meet the California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 4 certification and lowpolluting fuels (e.g., low NOx diesel). • All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during construction except for emergencies.
• The idling of all construction equipment and construction related vehicles shall be limited to three (3) minutes. • Grading and earthmoving activities shall be prohibited on days with an Air Quality Index (AQI) greater than 100.

MM AQ-5d All logistics use facility projects shall provide documentation to the City of Moreno Valley demonstrating that the following operational measures shall be implemented, as applicable to the project:
• All logistics use facility projects shall utilize trucks with a minimum 2014 model year by 2027.
• All logistics use facility projects shall use 100 percent zero emission vehicles (ZEV) for forklifts, yard trucks, and other on site equipment. • All logistics use facility projects shall have signage noting a three (3)-minute idling limit and shall provide the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)-complaint call-in line to submit idling complaints. • All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during operation except for emergencies.
• All logistics use facility projects shall provide workers with secure bicycle storage facilities with outlets for electric bicycles and on-site meals or lunch shuttle programs.
• All logistics use facility projects shall also provide workers with transit route information and incentives to carpool, such as dedicated carpool parking spaces.
• All logistics use facility projects shall implement training programs for managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to minimize truck queuing and idling.

All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during construction except for emergencies.

The idling of all construction equipment and construction related vehicles shall be limited to three (3) minutes. * Grading and earthmoving activities shall be prohibited on days with an Air Quality Index (AQl) greater than 100.

All logistics use facility projects shall utilize trucks with a minimum 2014 model year by 2027.

All logistics use facility projects shall use 100 percent zero emission vehicles (ZEV) for forklifts, yard trucks, and other on site equipment.

All logistics use facility projects shall have signage noting a three (3)-minute idling limit and shall provide the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)}-complaint call-in line to submit idling complaints.

All logistics use facility projects shall be prohibited from using diesel generators during operation except for emergencies.

All logistics use facility projects shall provide workers with secure bicycle storage facilities with outlets for electric bicycles and on-site meals or lunch shuttle programs.

All logistics use facility projects shall also provide workers with transit route information and incentives to carpool, such as dedicated carpool parking spaces.

All logistics use facility projects shall implement training programs for managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to minimize truck queuing and idling.

5.3.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would not be consistent with the AQMP and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. The Project does not Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 31 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 283
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 32 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations, which would conflict with or obstruct the implementation of an applicable air quality plan.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The truck route modifications would not change the total number of truck trips overall but rather reroute these trips along different roadway segments. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to air quality. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215 and prioritizing access to industrial areas. As described in Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment of this Addendum, the modification of the truck routes would result in a VMT increase of approximately 2.8 percent and an increase of mobile source emissions of criteria pollutants of less than 1 percent due to the minor increase in VMT. 3 Neither increase
is considered substantial because the shifting of truck trips would decrease the incremental carcinogenic risk for the majority of sensitive receptors. A few receptors areas may have incremental higher risk; however, such risk would remain below South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 10 in one million incremental thresholds. The increase in emissions is negligible in magnitude and does not result in a new or more severe impact. Impacts related to operational air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable, consistent with the conclusions in the 2024 RFEIR.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on an applicable air quality plan, such impacts would continue to be significant and unavoidable.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Environmental Impact Analysis
propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations, which would conflict with or obstruct the implementation of an applicable air quality plan.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The truck route modifications would not change the total number of truck trips overall but rather reroute these trips along different roadway segments. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to air quality. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and [1-215 and prioritizing access to industrial areas. As described in Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment of this Addendum, the modification of the truck routes would result in a VMT increase of approximately 2.8 percent and an increase of mobile source emissions of criteria pollutants of less than 1 percent due to the minor increase in VMT.? Neither increase is considered substantial because the shifting of truck trips would decrease the incremental carcinogenic risk for the majority of sensitive receptors. A few receptors areas may have incremental higher risk; however, such risk would remain below South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 10 in one million incremental thresholds. The increase in emissions is negligible in magnitude and does not result in a new or more severe impact. Impacts related to operational air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable, consistent with the conclusions in the 2024 RFEIR.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
3 While the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR), now referred to as the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, guidance does not characterize truck trips as “automobiles” subject to VMT analysis under CEQA. As such, the VMT analysis for truck contained in this addendum is provided for informational purposes. Refer to the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, dated December 2018, for more information. Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 32 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 284
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 33 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report As discussed in the 2024 RFEIR, future development resulting from the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in air pollutant emissions generated during construction activities. Similarly, operations of future development projects under implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in emissions of area sources (e.g., consumer products, architectural coating, and landscape equipment), energy sources (i.e., natural gas usage for space and water heating and cooking), and mobile sources (i.e., motor vehicles from vehicle trips generated by implementation of the proposed Project).

Although no specific development projects are proposed as part of the Project, future development operational emissions would be associated with area sources, energy sources, and mobile sources.

As detailed in Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment, modification of the proposed truck routes would result in a minor increase in mobile source emissions due to the small VMT increase with the shifting of truck trips. Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040)1 presents the criteria air pollutant emissions for the Without Project Scenario (2024 GPU) (current truck routes) and With Project Scenario (proposed truck route modifications) in the year 2040.

Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040)1 Source
Maximum Pounds Per Day2
VOC NOX CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Without Project Scenario 2,748 2,936 27,936 78 6,069 1,552 With Project Scenario (EMFAC2025) 2,748 2,942 27,938 78 6,074 1,554 Net Increase <1 6 2 <1 5 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.2% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
With Project Scenario (EMFAC2021
with adjustment factors) 2,748 2,957 27,938 78 6,075 1,554 Net Increase <1 21 2 <1 6 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.7% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds; NOX = Nitrogen Oxides; CO = Carbon Monoxide; SOx = Sulfur Dioxide; PM10 = Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less; PM2.5 = Particulate Matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less.

1. The mobile emissions include brake wear, tire wear, re-entrained road dust and vehicle exhaust.

2. Total emissions may be off due to rounding.

Refer to Appendix B for modeling results.

As shown in Table 1, the With Project Scenario would increase mobile emissions of some criteria pollutants by 0.1 to 0.7 percent using EMFAC2025 or EMFAC2021 with adjustment factors. These minor increases are not considered substantial since any increase in emissions would be negligible in magnitude and would not have a new or more severe impact. Therefore, impacts related to operational air quality emissions would remain significant and unavoidable, consistent with the conclusions in the 2024 RFEIR.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to Environmental Impact Analysis
As discussed in the 2024 RFEIR,future development resulting from the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in air pollutant emissions generated during construction activities. Similarly, operations of future development projects under implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in emissions of area sources (e.g., consumer products, architectural coating, and landscape equipment), energy sources (i.e., natural gas usage for space and water heating and cooking), and mobile sources (i.e., motor vehicles from vehicle trips generated by implementation of the proposed Project).

Although no specific development projects are proposed as part of the Project, future development operational emissions would be associated with area sources, energy sources, and mobile sources.

As detailed in Appendix B: Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment, modification of the proposed truck routes would result in a minor increase in mobile source emissions due to the small VMT increase with the shifting of truck trips. Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040)" presents the criteria air pollutant emissions for the Without Project Scenario (2024 GPU) (current truck routes) and With Project Scenario (proposed truck route modifications) in the year 2040.

Table 1: Operational Mobile Criteria Pollutant Emissions (Year 2040)" MaximumPoundsPerDay?
Source voc NOx co SOx PM10 PM2.5
Without Project Scenario 2,748 2,936 27,936 78 6,069 1,552 With Project Scenario (EMFAC2025) 2,748 2,942 27,938 78 6,074 1,554 Net Increase <1 6 2 <1 5 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.2% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
With Project Scenario (EMFAC2021
. . 2,748 2,957 27,938 78 6,075 1,554 with adjustment factors) Net Increase <1 21 2 <1 6 2
Percent Change 0.0% 0.7% <0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
VOC= Volatile Organic Compounds; NOx= Nitrogen Oxides; CO= Carbon Monoxide; SOx= Sulfur Dioxide; PM10 = Particulate Matter 10 microns in diameter or less; PM2.5 = Particulate Matter 2.5 microns in diameter or less.

1. The mobile emissions include brake wear, tire wear, re-entrained road dust and vehicle exhaust.

2. Total emissions may be off due to rounding.

Refer to Appendix B for modeling results.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 33 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 285
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 34 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Sine Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, such impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? No New or More Severe Significant Impact
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in significant and unavoidable impacts for construction and less than significant with mitigation incorporated during operations. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications.

Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes network and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Moreover, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way, there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

As described in Appendix B, the truck route modifications proposed by the Project would change the number of truck trips along the studied roadway segments, which in turn will change the carcinogenic risk assessment, cancer burden, and chronic hazard assessment. The majority of the receptors surrounding said segments will see a reduction incremental carcinogenic risk. However, while a few receptors may be exposed to any incremental higher risk on the order of 0.04 to 2.88 in one million, the risk would remain below SCAQMD 10 in one million incremental thresholds, which is not considered substantial.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Environmental Impact Analysis
the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified.

Sine Project implementation will not resultin any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, such impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 34 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 286
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 35 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the implementation of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would result in lessthan-significant impacts, including emissions of odors, affecting a substantial number of people. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways, which would result in other emissions, such as those leading to odors. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to odors. The Project proposes to reassign truck activity on local streets and near sensitive receptors, shifting freight movement to the regional corridors such as SR 60 and I-215 and prioritizing access to industrial areas. In summary, the proposed revised truck routes network would shift truck trips farther away from the majority of sensitive receptors and closer to smaller sensitive receptor populations. Therefore, the net impact of potential odors from trucks would be reduced, and the Project would not result in emissions (such as those leading to odors) that would adversely affect a substantial number of people.

Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on other emissions that would lead to odors, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Environmental Impact Analysis
Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 35 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 287
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 36 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.3.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to air quality than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR for the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant air quality impacts than were previously analyzed; as such, no further environmental evaluation is required.

Environmental Impact Analysis

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 36 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 288
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 37 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.4 Biological Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or
More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
Will the Project:
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications,
on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
MM BIO-2
b) Have a substantial adverse
effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural
community identified in local
or regional plans, policies,
regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
c) Have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally
protected wetlands (including,
but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or
other means?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
d) Interfere substantially with
the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
Less than
significant No No No None
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
ordinance?
Less than
significant No No No None
Environmental Impact Analysis
54 The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Biological Resources
EnvironmentalIssue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
RequiringNew
Analysis or Verification?Mitigation
Measures
Will the Project:
a) Have a substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special
status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No
MM BIO-1
MM BIO-2
b) Have a substantial adverse
effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
c) Have a substantial adverse
effect on state or federally
protected wetlands (including,
but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc)
through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM BIO-1
d} Interfere substantially with
the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
Less than
significant
No No No None
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Less than
significant
No No No None
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 37 289
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 38 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report f) Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural
Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Less than
significant No No No None

5.4.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would have the potential to directly or indirectly impact candidate, sensitive, or special status species, sensitive riparian habitats, and jurisdictional wetlands and waters. However, implementation of MM BIO-1 and MM BIO-2 would reduce impacts on sensitive and special status species and sensitive riparian habitats. Mitigation would be provided on a project-by-project basis. Therefore, impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special status species, sensitive riparian habitats, and jurisdictional wetlands and waters would remain significant and unavoidable. The 2024 RFEIR determined that buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would have less than significant impacts on wildfire corridors, local policies and ordinances, and the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM BIO-1 would require a site-specific biology survey for sites with the potential for sensitive biological resources to be present. This survey would occur at the time future projects are proposed, based on sitespecific conditions at the time of application. The measures provide a framework for future development consistent with the 2024 GPU to reduce potentially significant impacts to the extent feasible.

MM BIO-1 Applications for future development of vacant properties (and portions thereof), wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to sensitive biological resources, shall be required to prepare a sitespecific general biological resources survey to identify the presence of any sensitive biological resources, including any sensitive plant or wildlife species. The report shall identify the need for focused presence/absence surveys and identify the presence of state or federal regulated wetlands or waters. If potentially significant impacts to sensitive biological resources, including sensitive species and/or wetlands are identified, the report shall also recommend appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts to below a level of significance.

MM BIO-2 Applications for future development, wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to mature trees and/or native vegetation suitable for nesting birds, shall be required to restrict removal of sensitive habitat and vegetation to outside the breeding seasons of any sensitive species identified within adjacent properties (typical bird breeding season is February 1– September 1. as early as January 1 for some raptors). If vegetation clearing must begin during the breeding season, a qualified biologist shall provide recommendations to avoid Environmental Impact Analysis
f} Conflict with the provisions
of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural . . Less than
Community Conservation Plan, - No No No None
significant or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?

5.4.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR concluded that the buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would have the potential to directly or indirectly impact candidate, sensitive, or special status species, sensitive riparian habitats, and jurisdictional wetlands and waters. However, implementation of MM BIO-1and MM BIO-2 would reduce impacts on sensitive and special status species and sensitive riparian habitats. Mitigation would be provided on a project-by-project basis. Therefore, impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special status species, sensitive riparian habitats, and jurisdictional wetlands and waters would remain significant and unavoidable. The 2024 RFEIR determined that buildout of the 2024 MoVal 2040 Project would have less than significant impacts on wildfire corridors, local policies and ordinances, and the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan.

MM BIO-2 Applications for future development, wherein the Director of Community Development or his or her designee has determined a potential for impacts to mature trees and/or native vegetation suitable for nesting birds, shall be required to restrict removal of sensitive habitat and vegetation to outside the breeding seasons of any sensitive species identified within adjacent properties (typical bird breeding season is February 1-— September 1. as early as January 1 for some raptors). If vegetation clearing must begin during the breeding season, a qualified biologist shall provide recommendations to avoid Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 38 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 290
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 39 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report impacts to nesting birds which typically includes a pre-construction survey within 3 days of the start of construction to determine the presence of active nests.

If active nests are found, avoidance measures shall be implemented to ensure protection of the nesting birds. Avoidance measures may include a no-activity buffer zone, typically 300 feet from the area of disturbance or 500 feet for raptors, established at the discretion of the qualified biologist in consultation with the City, If activity buffer zones are not feasible, temporary noise barriers may be installed to attenuate construction noise. Noise wall height and adequacy shall be supported by a noise analysis to determine the anticipated construction noise levels with attenuation measures as recommended by the biologist and approved by the City. Periodic noise monitoring shall be conducted during construction to ensure noise attenuation standards are met. Accepted noise levels are species dependent and existing ambient noise levels can play a factor in establishing baseline acceptable noise.

5.4.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species were significant and unavoidable. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Since the Project will not modify any 2024 GPU policies or programs specific to biological resources, the Project would not impact any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species, such impacts would be less than significant.

Environmental Impact Analysis
impacts to nesting birds which typically includes a pre-construction survey within 3 days of the start of construction to determine the presence of active nests.

5.4.2 Analysis of Proposed Project
Threshold (a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts on candidate, sensitive, or special-status species were significant and unavoidable. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Since the Project will not modify any 2024 GPU policies or programs specific to biological resources, the Project would not impact any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species, such impacts would be less than significant.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 39 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 291
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 40 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Applicable Mitigation Measures from the REFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would be significant and unavoidable. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes to revise the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415.

The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to riparian habitats since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fishand Wildlife or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community would be significant and unavoidable. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes to revise the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB415.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found there would be significant and unavoidable impacts to federally protected wetlands. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 40 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 292
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 41 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Since the Project will not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to federally protected wetlands, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on wetlands, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that buildout of the 2024 GPU would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridor, and impacts would be less than significant.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to a migratory wildlife corridor, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Environmental Impact Analysis
routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. Since the Project will not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to federally protected wetlands, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on wetlands, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to a migratory wildlife corridor, since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 41 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 293
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 42 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on wildlife corridors, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances related to protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and Threshold (f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts would be less than significant regarding wildlife policies, ordinances, or plans. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB 415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs regarding specific biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and would not conflict with provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. The Project would comply with 2024 GPU policies that support the protection of biologically significant habitats where practical, including the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, riparian areas, habitats of rare and endangered species, and other areas of natural significance.

Moreover, the Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs specific to or be located within the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Conserved Lands, Criteria Cells, or Public/Quasi Public Lands since the Project would be located within the existing public right-of-way and there would be no construction on existing roads, other than the future development of several interior streets in the World Logistics Center Project, which were approved for truck travel under previously approved land use entitlements on land that remains zoned for industrial and business park uses and analyzed in the context of World Logistics Center Revised Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2012021045).

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:

Environmental Impact Analysis
Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on wildlife corridors, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Threshold (e)} Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances related to protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and Threshold (f} Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan?
No New or More Severe Significant Impact: The 2024 RFEIR found that impacts would be less than significant regarding wildlife policies, ordinances, or plans. The Project does not propose site-specific development and would not result in any modifications to existing land use designations or modify any existing roadways or roadway classifications. Specifically, the Project proposes revising the City’s truck routes and the policies and actions of the Circulation Element to align with AB 98 and SB415. The Project would not modify any General Plan policies or programs regarding specific biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, and would not conflict with provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan. The Project would comply with 2024 GPU policies that support the protection of biologically significant habitats where practical, including the San Jacinto Wildlife Area, riparian areas, habitats of rare and endangered species, and other areas of natural significance.

Additionally, no aspect of the Project triggers any of the following conditions from CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 relating to this issue:

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 42 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 294
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 43 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on local policies or ordinances or the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

5.4.3 Conclusion
Since the Project will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts to biological resources than those disclosed in the 2024 RFEIR, no new or revised mitigation is required. There is no new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known at the time the 2024 RFEIR was prepared. Finally, there are no changes to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that would result in more significant biological resources impacts than were previously analyzed. No further environmental evaluation is required.

Environmental Impact Analysis
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been Since Project implementation will not result in any new or substantially more significant impacts that could have a substantial adverse effect on local policies or ordinances or the adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, such impacts would be less than significant.

Applicable Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
No mitigation measures are required.

Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 43 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 295
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 44 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report

5.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

Environmental Issue Areas
Conclusion
in 2024
RFEIR
New or
More
Severe
Impacts?
New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Requiring New
Analysis or
Verification?
Mitigation
Measures
a) Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a
historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM CUL-1
b) Cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5? Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No
MM CUL-2
MM CUL-3
MM CUL-4
MM CUL-5
MM CUL-6
MM CUL-7
MM CUL-8
MM CUL-9
c) Disturb any human remains,
including those interred outside
of formal cemeteries?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM CUL-10
MM CUL-11
d) Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in
PRC Section 21074 as either a
site, features, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native
American Tribe, and that is:
i) Listed or eligible for listing
in the CRHR, or in a local
register or
ii) A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to
criteria set form in
subdivision c of PRC Section
5024.1?
Significant
and
unavoidable
No No No MM CUL-1
MM CUL-11

5.5 Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources
The table below summarizes the conclusions in this section.

New New
New or Circumstances Information
Conclusion More Involving New | RequiringNew
in 2024 Severe or More Severe Analysis or Mitigation
EnvironmentalIssue Areas RFEIR Impacts? Impacts? Verification? Measures a) Cause a substantial adverse A
change in the significance of a Significant
. ; and No No No MM CUL-1
historical resource pursuant to unavoidable
§15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse MM CUL-2
change in the significance of an MM CUL-3
archaeological resource Significant MM CUL-4
pursuant to §15064.5? and No No No MM CUL-5
unavoidable MM CUL-6 MM CUL-7
MM CUL-8
MM CUL-9
c) Disturb any human remains, Significant MM CUL-10
including those interred outside and No No No
; . MM CUL-11 of formal cemeteries? unavoidable
d} Would the project cause a
substantial adverse change in
the significance of a tribal
cultural resource, defined in
PRC Section 21074 as either a
site, features, place, cultural
landscape that is geographically
defined in terms of the size and
scope of the landscape, sacred
place, or object with cultural
value to a California Native Significant MM CUL-1
American Tribe, and that is: and No No No MM CUL-11
i} Listed or eligible for listing | unavoidable
in the CRHR, or in a local
register or
ii) A resource determined by
the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by
substantial evidence, to be
significant pursuant to
criteria set form in
subdivision ¢ of PRC Section
5024.1?

5.5.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis
The 2024 RFEIR determined that impacts from future development would have the potential to result in a substantial adverse effect on historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 44 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 296
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 45 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report cultural resources, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Implementation of MM CUL-1, MM CUL-2, MM CUL-3, MM CUL-4, MM CUL-5, MM CUL-6, MM CUL-7, MM CUL-8, MM CUL-9, MM CUL-10, and MM CUL-11 would reduce impacts to historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal cultural resources, but impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM CUL-1 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future development site-specific project that would directly or indirectly affect a building/structure in excess of 50 years of age, the City or a qualified architectural historian shall determine whether the affected building/structure is historically significant. The evaluation shall be based on criteria such as age, location, context, association with an important person or event, uniqueness, or structural integrity, as indicated in the CEQA Guidelines. If the evaluation determines that building/structure is not historic, no further evaluation or mitigation would be required.

If the building/structure is determined to be historically significant, the preferred mitigation would be to avoid the resource through project redesign. If the resource cannot be avoided, all prudent and feasible measures to minimize or mitigate harm to the resource shall be taken per recommendations of the qualified architectural historian..

MM CUL-2 Prior to issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project that would potentially have a direct or indirect affect an archaeological resource, the City shall require the following steps be taken to determine: (1) the presence of archaeological resources, and (2) the appropriate mitigation for any significant resources which may be impacted by project development. The following steps would help determine the presence or absence of archaeological resources.

Step 1: An archaeologist shall conduct records and background research at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) for a list of recorded resources and request a sacred lands file search from the Native American Heritage Commission.

Step 2: After review of this data, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted by a qualified archaeologist.

Step 3: If through the research and the field survey, archaeological resources are identified, then an evaluation of significance shall be completed by a qualified archaeologist. The evaluation program generally will include excavation to determine depth, extent, integrity, and content of the subsurface cultural material.

Step 4: The results of the excavation will be evaluated using the Thresholds above in Section 4.5.4.

Step 5: If an archaeological resource is determined significant and avoidance through project redesign is not feasible, a data recovery and construction monitoring program must be implemented to reduce the impacts the archaeological resource to below a significant level. The data recovery program must be approved by the City.

Step 6: A final data recovery and/monitoring report shall be completed in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Archaeological Resource Management Reports: Recommended Content and Format. Confidential attachments must be submitted under separate covers. Artifacts collected during the evaluation and data recovery phases must be curated at an appropriate facility consistent with state (California State Historic Resources Commission’s Environmental Impact Analysis
cultural resources, and impacts would be significant and unavoidable. Implementation of MM CUL-1, MM CuUL-2,MM CUL-3,MM CUL-4,MM CUL-5,MM CUL-6,MM CUL-7,MM CUL-8,MM CUL-9,MM CUL-10, and MM CUL-11would reduce impacts to historical resources, archaeological resources, human remains, and Tribal cultural resources, but impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.

Mitigation Measures from the 2024 RFEIR
MM CUL-1
MM CUL-2
Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future development site-specific project that would directly or indirectly affect a building/structure in excess of 50 years of age, the City or a qualified architectural historian shall determine whether the affected building/structure is historically significant. The evaluation shall be based on criteria such as age, location, context, association with an important person or event, uniqueness, or structural integrity, as indicated in the CEQA Guidelines. If the evaluation determines that building/structure is not historic, no further evaluation or mitigation would be required.

Prior to issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project that would potentially have a direct or indirect affect an archaeological resource, the City shall require the following steps be taken to determine: (1) the presence of archaeological resources, and (2) the appropriate mitigation for any significant resources which may be impacted by project development. The following steps would help determine the presence or absence of archaeological resources.

Step 2: After review of this data, a pedestrian survey shall be conducted by a qualified archaeologist.

Step 4: The results of the excavation will be evaluated using the Thresholds above in Section 4.5.4.

Step 6: A final data recovery and/monitoring report shall be completed in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Archaeological Resource Management Reports: Recommended Content and Format. Confidential attachments must be submitted under separate covers. Artifacts collected during the evaluation and data recovery phases must be curated at an appropriate facility consistent with state (California State Historic Resources Commission’s Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 45 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 297
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 46 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report Guidelines for Curation of Archaeological Collection 1993) and federal curation standards (36 CFR 79 of the Federal Register) and that allows access to artifact collections.

MM CUL-3 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the project developer shall retain a professional archaeologist (Project Archaeologist), at no cost to the City, to conduct monitoring of all ground disturbing activities associated with the respective project. The Project Archaeologist shall be authorized to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), which have requested monitoring, the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) as defined in CUL-5. The Project Archeologist shall attend all pre-grading meetings with the City, the project’s construction manager, the project’s general contractor and the pertinent contractors. In addition, the Project’s Archaeologist shall provide and conduct Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training, which the project’s construction manager, general contractor, and all pertinent subcontracts shall be required to attend. In addition, to the Project Archaeologist, the designated archaeological monitor for the respective project shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed.

MM CUL-4 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the project Developer shall secure agreements with the Consulting Tribe(s). The project developer shall provide a minimum of 30 days’ advance notice to the tribes of all ground-disturbing activities. The Native American Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed. The Native American Monitor(s) shall be invited to attend all pre-grading meetings with the Project Archaeologist, the City, the construction manager, and general contractor, and any pertinent subcontractors and conduct the Tribal Perspective of the mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance.

MM CUL-5 The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the project’s construction manager and general contractor, and the City shall develop a CRMP in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site.

MM CUL-3 Prior to the issuance of any permit for a future site-specific project, the project developer shall retain a professional archaeologist (Project Archaeologist), at no cost to the City, to conduct monitoring of all ground disturbing activities associated with the respective project. The Project Archaeologist shall be authorized to temporarily redirect earthmoving activities in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed during Project construction. The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), which have requested monitoring, the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) as defined in CUL-5. The Project Archeologist shall attend all pre-grading meetings with the City, the project’s construction manager, the project's general contractor and the pertinent contractors. In addition, the Project's Archaeologist shall provide and conduct Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training, which the project's construction manager, general contractor, and all pertinent subcontracts shall be required to attend. In addition, to the Project Archaeologist, the designated archaeological monitor for the respective project shall have the authority to temporarily halt and redirect earth-moving activities in the affected area in the event that suspected archaeological resources are unearthed.

MM CUL-5 The Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the project's construction manager and general contractor, and the City shall develop a CRMP in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site.

A Consulting Tribe is defined as a Tribe that initiated the AB 52 and/or SB 18 tribal consultation process for the project, and has not opted out of the AB 52 and/or SB 18 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 and/or SB18 consultation with the City as provided for in PRCSection 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project description and location
b. Project grading and development scheduling;
c. Roles and responsibilities of individuals on the project; d. The pre-grading meeting and Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training details;
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 46 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 298
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 47 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report e. The protocols and stipulations that the project’s construction manager and general contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s), and Project Archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
f. The type of recordation needed for inadvertent finds and the stipulations of recordation of sacred items.
g. Contact information of relevant individuals for the project.

MM CUL-6 In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of ground disturbing activities (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Moreno Valley Planning Division:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation-In-place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place they were found with no grading or construction activities commencing that may potentially affect or otherwise impact the integrity of the resources.
ii. Onsite reburial of the discovered items as detailed in the treatment plan required pursuant to Mitigation Measure CUL-3. This shall include measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed. No recordation of sacred items is permitted without the written consent of all Consulting Native American Tribal Governments as defined in CUL-5 The location for the future reburial area shall be identified on a confidential exhibit on file with the City, and concurred to by the Consulting Native American Tribal Governments prior to certification of the environmental document.

MM CUL-7 The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan of any future site-specific project: “If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground–disturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find.

MM CUL-8 If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at any future site-specific project that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, all ground-disturbing activities in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the Environmental Impact Analysis
e. The protocols and stipulations that the project's construction manager and general contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s), and Project Archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
f. The type of recordation needed for inadvertent finds and the stipulations of recordation of sacred items.
g. Contact information of relevant individuals for the project.

MM CUL-7 The City shall verify that the following note is included on the Grading Plan of any future site-specific project: “If any suspected archaeological resources are discovered during ground—disturbing activities and the Project Archaeologist or Native American Tribal Representatives are not present, the construction supervisor is obligated to halt work in a 100-foot radius around the find and call the Project Archaeologist and the Tribal Representatives to the site to assess the significance of the find.

MM CUL-8 If potential historic or cultural resources are uncovered during excavation or construction activities at any future site-specific project that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, all ground-disturbing activities in the affected area within 100 feet of the uncovered resource must cease immediately and a qualified person meeting the Secretary of the Interior's standards (36 CFR 61), Tribal Representatives, and all site monitors per the Mitigation Measures, shall be consulted by the City to evaluate the find, and as appropriate recommend alternative measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate negative effects on the historic, or prehistoric resource. Further ground disturbance shall not resume within the Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 47 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report 299
Environmental Impact Analysis
Supporting MoVal 2040 Circulation Element Update, Truck Route Ordinance, and Truck Routes Map Project 48 Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Final Program Environmental Impact Report area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional archeologists and Tribal Monitors if needed.

Determinations and recommendations by the consultant shall be immediately submitted to the Planning Division for consideration and implemented as deemed appropriate by the Community Development Director, in consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and any and all Consulting Native American Tribes as defined in CUL-4 before any further work commences in the affected area. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the Project Archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.

MM CUL-9 Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) at the San Diego State University (SDSU) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to each of the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

Moreno Valley City CouncilOctober 20, 2026

Moreno Valley City Council
October 20, 2026