Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Morgan Hill City Council
November 15, 2023

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
November 15, 2023
Body
Morgan Hill City Council
Pages
817
Original file
217.5 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on morganhillca.api.civicclerk.com. That file is the official record.

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 73 ends

July 2023
Airport Comprehensive Land Use Plan.41 In addition, the project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels associated with air traffic, and no impact would occur.
41 Santa Clara County. Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Santa Clara County, South County Airport. Amended November 16, 2016.

Page 401 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 74 ends

July 2023
XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through
projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
   
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
   
Discussion
a. The project site does not contain any existing residential development, nor would the proposed project result in the addition of residential development to the site. As such, buildout of the proposed project would not induce population growth. The primary consideration regarding increased growth is not the growth itself, but the effects of such growth on the City’s infrastructure systems, with the key inquiry being whether the systems would become overburdened as a result of the additional demand created by the project.

As discussed in Section XIX, Utilities and Service Systems, of this Initial Study, adequate utility infrastructure would be available to support the proposed project. Thus, the proposed project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly or indirectly, and no impact would occur. b. The proposed project would not require the demolition of any existing residential units. As such, the proposed project would not displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, and no impact would occur.

Page 402 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 75 ends

July 2023
XV. PUBLIC SERVICES.

Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Fire protection?    
b. Police protection?    
c. Schools?    
d. Parks?    
e. Other Public Facilities?    
Discussion
a-e. The City of Morgan Hill contracts with California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) for fire protection services. The nearest fire station to the project site (El Toro Station) is located approximately 1.6 miles to the southwest. Although the City has not adopted response time standards or goals related to fire suppression, CAL FIRE is held to a seven minute, 59 second response time standard based on the 911 Emergency Medical Services Provider Agreement between the City of Morgan Hill and the County of Santa Clara Emergency Medical Services Agency. 42 The incremental increase in demand for fire protection associated with the proposed project would not necessitate new or physically altered fire protection facilities and would not be substantial enough such that the current response times could not be maintained. In addition, the proposed building would include a fire sprinkler system which would decrease the likelihood of fire-related incidents to occur at the site.

The project site is also located in close proximity to the Morgan Hill Police Department, which is located at 16200 Vineyard Boulevard, approximately 3.5 miles south of the site.

Thus, police response times would be comparable to nearby existing developments.

With respect to schools and recreational facilities, given that the project would be a commercial use, the proposed project would not increase the demand for public schools, parks, or libraries in the area.

Because the project is an allowable use under the site’s General Plan land use designation, buildout of the site has been evaluated in the City’s General Plan EIR and assumed in City planning efforts. Thus, the associated increase in demand for public services has already been anticipated and planned for by the City. Furthermore, the proposed project would be subject to payment of development impact fees, which are used to help pay for infrastructure, including fire facilities, police facilities, and other public facilities needed to support new development within the City.

Based on the above, the proposed project would have no impact with respect to creating adverse physical environmental impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection, police protection, schools, and other public facilities.
42 Dwight Good, Assistant Chief Cooperative Fire Protection, Morgan Hill Fire Department. Personal communication [phone] with Nick Pappani, Vice President, Raney Planning and Management, Inc. June 1, 2021.

Page 403 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 76 ends

July 2023
XVI. RECREATION.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
   
b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
   
Discussion
a,b. The proposed project would include the development of a drive-through restaurant. The proposed project would not result in population growth that could result in increased use of existing recreational facilities, nor would the proposed project include or require construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Thus, no impact would occur related to recreational resources.

Page 404 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 77 ends

July 2023
XVII. TRANSPORTATION.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
   
b. Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?    
c. Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
   
d. Result in inadequate emergency access?    
Discussion
a. The law has changed with respect to how transportation-related impacts may be addressed under CEQA. Traditionally, lead agencies used LOS to assess the significance of such impacts, with greater levels of congestion considered to be more significant than lesser levels. Enacted as part of Senate Bill 743 (2013), PRC Section 21099, subdivision (b)(1), directed the OPR to prepare, develop, and transmit to the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency for certification and adoption proposed CEQA Guidelines addressing “criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts of projects within transit priority areas. Those criteria shall promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.” Pursuant to SB 743, the Natural Resources Agency promulgated CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 in late 2018. It became effective in early 2019. Subdivision (a) of that section provides that “[g]enerally, vehicle miles traveled is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. For the purposes of this section, ‘vehicle miles traveled’ refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. Other relevant considerations may include the effects of the project on transit and non-motorized travel.

Except as provided in subdivision (b)(2) below (regarding roadway capacity), a project’s effect on automobile delay shall not constitute a significant environmental impact.” Please refer to Question ‘b’ for a discussion of VMT.

Transit, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Facilities
Bus service in the City of Morgan Hill is provided by the Santa Clara VTA, which operates local bus service with regional connections to destinations north and south of Morgan Hill.

The nearest bus stop to the project site is located less than 200 feet north of the project site at the intersection of Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard. Because the proposed project would only slightly increase transit riders, the demands of the proposed project could be accommodated by the existing transit facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy related to the City’s transit facilities.

In the project vicinity, bike lanes are located along both sides of Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard. Due to the nature of the proposed project, the project is not expected to generate a significant amount of bicycle trips. Therefore, the demand generated by the proposed project could be accommodated by the existing bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project site. Thus, the proposed project would not conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy related to the City’s bicycle facilities.

Page 405 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 78 ends

July 2023
Currently, sidewalks are located along each side of both Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard. Sidewalks along roadways within the in-construction Evergreen Village are currently missing, but will be constructed concurrently with the Village. Crosswalks with protected crossing phases are provided along all four legs of the intersection of Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard, and another crosswalk is provided at the intersection of Sutter Boulevard and Jarvis Drive, south of the project site.

As part of the proposed project, the existing sidewalks along the Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard project frontages would be reconstructed. New ADA-compliant curb ramps would be installed at the southwest corner of the intersection of Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard, at the northwest corner of the intersection of Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Plaza, as well as along the proposed project driveways and at on-site pedestrian crossings across drive-through lanes. In addition, a new sidewalk would be constructed along the easement drive to the south of the project site, providing a continuous pedestrian route between Sutter Boulevard and the future Evergreen Village.

Overall, the existing and proposed pedestrian infrastructure would provide adequate connection and circulation in the project vicinity. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with existing transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities.

Conclusion
Based on the above, no impact would occur related to conflicting with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities.
b. Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines provides specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. Pursuant to Section 15064.3, analysis of VMT attributable to a project is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts, with other relevant considerations consisting of the effects of the project on transit and nonmotorized travel. VMT is the total miles of travel by personal motorized vehicles a project is expected to generate in a day. VMT measures the full distance of personal motorized vehicle-trips, with one end within the project site. Typically, development projects that are farther from other, complementary land uses (such as a business park far from housing) and in areas without transit or active transportation infrastructure (bike lanes, sidewalks, etc.) generate more driving than development near complementary land uses with more robust transportation options. Therefore, development projects located in a central business district with high density and diversity of complementary land uses and frequent transit services are expected to internalize trips and generate shorter and fewer vehicle trips than developments located in a suburban area with low density of residential developments and no transit service in the project vicinity.

To adhere to the state’s legislation, the City is currently developing the framework for new transportation policies based on the implementation of VMT as the primary measure of transportation impacts for CEQA purposes. The new policies will replace the City’s current transportation policies that are based on LOS. However, as the City has not formally adopted City-specific VMT policies, the VMT assessment for the proposed project incorporated methodology and impact thresholds recommended in the OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (Technical Advisory). A VMT Assessment was prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation

Page 406 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 79 ends

July 2023
Consultants, Inc. in order to assess VMT-related impacts of the proposed project (see Appendix D).
43 The OPR provides screening threshold recommendations that are intended to identify when a project can be determined to cause a less-than-significant impact without conducting a detailed VMT evaluation. The OPR screening threshold recommendations are based on project size, maps, transit availability, and provision of affordable housing.

One such recommendation is that local-serving retail developments (considered to be less than 50,000 sf in size) may be assumed to cause a less-than-significant impact on VMT.

However, the guidelines for the evaluation of VMT for development projects is limited to general land use categories such as residential, office, industrial, and retail. Therefore, the assessment of VMT for the proposed fast-food restaurant required a conversion to an equivalent amount of one of the general land uses that has similar trip generating and trip origin/destination characteristics. The number and origination/destination of daily trips and resulting VMT generated by the proposed fast-food restaurant available within the City would be similar to that of local-serving retail since there is not another Chick-fil-A restaurant located within the City. As such, the proposed project would provide service to City residents that does not exist today. Therefore, the proposed fast-food restaurant was converted to an equivalent amount of local-serving retail space based on a comparison of estimated daily trips using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip rates for the proposed fast-food restaurant and typical retail uses.

The VMT Assessment estimated site-generated vehicular traffic for the proposed project by using trip generation rates that were determined based on vehicular counts at three existing Chick-fil-A restaurants with two drive-through lanes and with comparable square footage as the proposed project. Daily trip generation was estimated based on the surveyed peak-hour trips and the ratio of peak-hour trips to daily trips for a fast-food restaurant with drive-through window (Land Use 934) published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The results of each survey were used to calculate average trip rates.

Using these average rates, the proposed project is estimated to produce 1,822 daily vehicle trips prior to any trip reductions.

Fast-food restaurants with drive-through windows attract a substantial number of pass-by trips, which are trips made by drivers who already pass by the project site on an adjacent street en-route to another destination, such as a trip from work to home. In contrast, primary (non-pass-by) trips are new trips made for the sole purpose of visiting the project site. Thus, pass-by trips are not considered new trips that are generated by the project site. However, the attraction of pass-by trips does result in a reassignment of existing traffic passing-by the project site on adjacent streets at site driveways and intersections immediately adjacent to the project site. Surveys of fast-food restaurants with a drivethrough window at various sites around the country exhibited an average pass-by rate of 50 percent during the PM peak hour. Therefore, a 55 percent reduction was assumed for the estimated daily trips. After subtracting pass-by trips, the project is expected to generate 911 primary vehicle trips per day.

The proposed project consists of a 5,028-sf drive-through restaurant. Because the OPR screening criteria are not directly applicable to such uses, the VMT Assessment converted the proposed project to an equivalent amount of retail/commercial use. The results of the 43 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. VMT Assessment for the Proposed 18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A in Morgan Hill, California. April 24, 2023.

Page 407 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 80 ends

July 2023
conversion of the proposed fast-food restaurant to an equivalent amount of retail/commercial space, indicate that the proposed fast-food restaurant would generate net new daily trips equivalent to that of an approximately 22,500-sf retail development. If pass-by reduction is not applied, the proposed project would generate daily trips equivalent to that of an approximately 49,500-sf retail development.

Because the proposed project’s converted retail size, with or without pass-by reductions, would be less than 50,000 sf, the proposed project may be presumed to be a local-serving facility and would therefore have a less-than-significant impact on VMT. The OPR guidelines suggest that by adding retail opportunities into the urban fabric and thereby improving retail destination proximity, local-serving retail development tends to shorten trips and reduce VMT. Chick-fil-A, in particular, does not have a significant presence in the Southern Santa Clara Valley region, with restaurants in South San Jose and Salinas being the closest to Morgan Hill. The proposed new Morgan Hill location would provide a proximate location for City residents to a Chick-fil-A restaurant, thus resulting in shorter trips and subsequent reduction in VMT generated by Morgan Hill residents for the purpose of visiting a Chick-fil-A location. Moreover, the trip generation estimates assume a significant number of trips will be pass-by trips, which are based on pass-by rates derived from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. As discussed above, pass-by trips are not considered new trips and merely result in a reassignment of existing through traffic (i.e., along Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard) at site driveways and intersections immediately adjacent to the project site. Such pass-by trips are already accounted for in the baseline VMT and are not new VMT generated by the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project can be presumed to be a local-serving facility and, as such, would not have a significant impact related to VMT.

Based on the above, the proposed project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), and no impact would occur. c,d. As part of the Trip Generation and Operations Analysis prepared for the proposed project, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. evaluated site access and geometric design.44 Primary vehicular access to the project site would be provided by an existing full-access driveway in the southern corner of the project site which connects to Sutter Boulevard.

The driveway along Sutter Boulevard currently serves the project site and an existing commercial/office use located southeast of the project site by way of a shared easement drive aisle. It is noted that the shared easement drive aisle also provides vehicular access to the future Evergreen Village Project west of the site. A secondary ingress-only access point is proposed along Cochrane Road. An existing landscaped median along Cochrane Road would prohibit inbound and outbound left-turns to and from the project driveway.

The City’s Design Standards specify a minimum driveway width of 16 feet and a maximum driveway width of 36 feet for commercial uses. The ingress-only Cochrane Road project driveway would be 22 feet wide, and, thus, would meet City standards. The proposed 35- foot wide two-way access point along the southern project frontage would fall within the acceptable range of standard driveway widths. However, the access point is along a shared easement and is not subject to the City’s standard driveway requirements. 44 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Subject: Trip Generation and Operations Analysis for the Proposed 18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A in Morgan Hill, California. June 23, 2023.

Page 408 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 81 ends

July 2023
Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any modifications to the City’s existing roadway system, and would provide adequate access to the site for emergency vehicles. Emergency vehicles would use the primary access driveway to enter the site, and could pull into the parking areas located on-site.

The proposed drive-through lanes would be compliant with the City’s standard requirements for drive-through facilities, as established in Chapter 18.92.040 of the City’s Code of Ordinances. The proposed drive-through would be comprised of two lanes, with each lane having its own ordering point. During non-peak periods, customers would merge into a single lane as they proceed past the ordering canopy towards the pick-up window.

During peak demand periods, customers would remain in two-lane configuration as staff members are deployed to deliver food to customers in the outside lane. When needed, the outside lane would also be used as a by-pass lane to prioritize customers with smaller orders through the drive-through sequence. Each lane would be 10 feet wide and would have their own entrance and exit points. The lanes would be separated by pavement markings and removable bollards. Each lane would have a maximum capacity of approximately 24 vehicles per lane, assuming 20 feet per car and full utilization of each lane.

As part of the Trip Generation and Operations Analysis prepared for the proposed project, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. observed vehicle queues at three existing Chick-fil-A restaurants with two drive-through lanes during the weekday AM and PM peakhours, as well as the Saturday lunchtime period, to confirm that the proposed drivethrough storage would be sufficient to meet demand. The maximum queue observed during weekdays was a total of 29 vehicles across two drive-through lanes during the PM peak-hour, while the maximum queue observed during the Saturday lunchtime period was 38 vehicles. As such, the proposed drive-through, which would have a total capacity for up to 48 vehicles, is anticipated to have adequate capacity to accommodate expected queues during peak hours.

Based on the observed drive-through queues, vehicle queues are unlikely to exceed the planned drive-through capacity, and are not expected to spill over into Sutter Boulevard or Cochrane Road. However, as a Condition of Approval, the proposed project would be required to prepare a Drive-Through Queue Management Plan that can be implemented during abnormally high demand periods to ensure that circulation within the on-site parking lot and on adjacent drive aisles would not be negatively affected by drive-through operations. The Drive-Through Queue Management Plan could include, but would not be limited to, measures used at other Chick-fil-A locations, including:
• Having staff members monitor the drive-through queues and direct traffic as necessary if queues extend beyond the drive-through lanes; • Implementing face-to-face ordering through an iPad ordering system during peak periods; or
• Using the secondary drive-through lane as a by-pass lane to expedite service for customers with smaller orders.

Implementation of the foregoing Drive-Through Queue Management Plan would ensure that operations of the proposed drive-through would not result in an adverse impact.

Page 409 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 82 ends

July 2023
Based on the above, the proposed project would not substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment), and would not result in inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no impact would occur.

Page 410 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 83 ends

July 2023
XVIII.TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES.

Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section
5020.1(k).
   
b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.
   
Discussion
a,b. As discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, of this Initial Study, the existing on-site structure does not meet the criteria to be eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or a local register of historical resources as defined in PRC Section 5020.1(k), and the site does not contain known resources that could be considered historic pursuant to the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of PRC Section 5024.1. Furthermore, due to the highly disturbed and previously developed nature of the project site, tribal cultural resources are unlikely to occur on-site. However, compliance with Section

18.60.090 of the City’s Municipal Code would ensure that the proper measures are taken should tribal cultural resources be discovered within the project site.

Given compliance with the City’s standard conditions of approval related to cultural resource discovery, no impact to tribal cultural resources would occur.

Page 411 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 84 ends

July 2023
XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE
SYSTEMS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No Impact
a. Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
   
b. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry, and multiple dry
years?
   
c. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
   
d. Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
   
e. Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
   
Discussion
a-c. Brief discussions of the water, wastewater, stormwater drainage, electrical, and telecommunications facilities that would serve the proposed project are included below.

Water
The City of Morgan Hill provides potable water service to its residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional customers within the City limits. The City’s water system facilities include 17 groundwater wells, 10 reservoir sites, nine pumping stations, and 165 miles of pressured pipes ranging from two to 14 inches in diameter. The City has planned and constructed water projects in conjunction with new street construction in anticipation of future growth and water needs.

According to the City’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the City’s projected water supply far exceeds the water demand for normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years until at least 2045.45 For example, Table 7-2 of the UWMP indicates that, under a 2045 multiple-dry year scenario, Morgan Hill would have a 22,810 acre-feet water surplus by the third dry year. According to the City’s UWMP, in 2020 domestic water use totaled approximately 7,808 acre-feet (AF), only 730 AF of which was supplied to commercial, institutional, and industrial uses within the City. As such, commercial uses represent a small fraction of the overall water demand. In addition, the proposed project is generally consistent with the project site’s General Plan land use and zoning designation; thus, the increase in water demand associated with the proposed project has been anticipated in the City’s UWMP projections. Furthermore, the water demand of the proposed project would be similar to the demand of the restaurant that formerly occupied the project site, 45 City of Morgan Hill. 2020 Urban Water Management Plan [pg. 7-4 to 7-7]. October 2021.

Page 412 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 85 ends

July 2023
and the proposed project would connect to the existing water supply infrastructure in the project vicinity.

The increase in water demand associated with implementation of the proposed project could be accommodated by the City’s existing water supplies, even after three consecutive dry years in the year 2045, as identified in the UWMP. Therefore, the proposed project would not require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, and sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources.

Wastewater
The City of Morgan Hill sewer collection system consists of approximately 160 miles of gravity sewers, over 3,000 manholes, nearly three miles of force mains, and 14 lift stations.

The sewer lines range in size from four inches to 30 inches in diameter and the piping system includes 26 siphons. The City’s collection system directs wastewater to the South County Regional Wastewater Authority (SCRWA) Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) located in southern Gilroy. SCRWA is a joint powers authority formed by the cities of Morgan Hill and Gilroy to collectively treat the wastewater of both cities.46 The City of Morgan Hill has an allocation of 3.56 million gallons per day (MGD) from the WWTF. The average dry weather flow from the City of Morgan Hill was approximately 2.7 MGD in 2015.47
As discussed above, because the proposed project would be generally consistent with the General Plan land use and zoning designation for the project site, the wastewater demands of the project site were anticipated in the General Plan EIR. In addition, the wastewater demand of the proposed project would be similar to the demand of the restaurant that formerly occupied the project site, and the proposed project would connect to the existing wastewater infrastructure in the project vicinity.

In addition, because the General Plan EIR determined that the WWTF would be required to be expanded in order to accommodate buildout of the General Plan, the SCRW is planning to fund, design, and construct expansion of the WWTF beyond its current wastewater treatment capacity of 8.5 MGD. The General Plan EIR determined that, after expansion of the treatment plant, wastewater generated by General Plan buildout, including the project site, would not exceed the expanded permitted treatment capacity of the SCRWA WWTF facility.

Based on the above, the incremental increase in wastewater generation associated with the development of the proposed project would not require the construction of new or expansion of existing wastewater treatment facilities, as capacity is already sufficient to serve the proposed project.

Stormwater
Issues related to stormwater infrastructure are discussed in Section X, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study. As noted therein, the proposed project would not significantly increase stormwater flows into the City’s existing system. The final drainage system design for the project will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer 46 City of Morgan Hill. City Council Staff Report 2163, Accept Report Regarding Wastewater System Needs and Rate Study Schedule. February 6, 2019. 47 City of Morgan Hill. 2035 General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report. January 2016.

Page 413 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 86 ends

July 2023
to confirm that the proposed drainage system for the project is consistent with the City’s Storm Drainage Master Plan and standard stormwater-related conditions of approval.

Therefore, the proposed project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.

Electricity, Natural Gas, and Telecommunications
Electricity service for the proposed project would be Pacific Gas & Electric. The proposed project would not use natural gas, as natural gas is prohibited in all new construction effective March 1, 2020, pursuant to City Ordinance No. 2306. The proposed project would be able to connect to the electricity infrastructure that already serves the site. Therefore, the project would not require major upgrades to, or extension of, existing infrastructure.

Conclusion
Based on the above, the increase in water demand, wastewater generation, and stormwater drainage associated with the proposed project could be adequately accommodated by existing facilities. In addition, the project is located within an urbanized area and would not require major expansion or extension of existing water, wastewater, electrical, or telecommunications facilities in the project area.

Therefore, the proposed project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, stormwater, electric power, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. Sufficient water supplies would be available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years. Furthermore, adequate wastewater capacity would be available to serve the project’s projected demand. Thus, no impact would occur. d,e. Recology South Valley provides solid waste and recycling services to the businesses and residents of the cities of Morgan Hill and Gilroy. Recology South Valley has contracted with the Monterey Regional Waste Management District to provide solid waste disposal services at the Monterey Peninsula Landfill and Materials Recovery Facility for the waste collected by Recology.48 Pursuant to the Landfill’s current Solid Waste Facility Permit, the Landfill has a maximum permitted tonnage limit of 3,500 tons per day and a design capacity of 49,700,000 cubic yards.49 Considering the relatively small scale of the proposed project, and because the project is consistent with the type of development that has been planned for the project site, the proposed project would not produce enough solid waste for the landfill to exceed capacity. As such, sufficient permitted capacity exists at the Monterey Peninsula Landfill and Materials Recovery Facility to accommodate the proposed project’s incremental increase in solid waste disposal needs. Furthermore, the proposed project would comply with applicable federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. For example, during project demolition and construction, as required by CBSC Section 4.408, the proposed project would be required to submit a Waste Management Plan to the City detailing on-site sorting of demolition and construction debris. Implementation of the Waste Management Plan would ensure that 48 Andi Borowski, Environmental Services Assistant, Morgan Hill Environmental Services Department. Personal communication [email] with Jesse Fahrney, Associate, Raney Planning and Management, Inc. July 26, 2022. 49 California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). Facility/Site Summary Details:

Monterey Peninsula Landfill (27-AA-0010). Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2642?siteID=1976. Accessed April 2023.

Page 414 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 87 ends

July 2023
the proposed project meets established diversion requirements for reused or recycled construction waste.

Based on the above, the proposed project would have no impact related to solid waste.

Page 415 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 88 ends

July 2023
XX. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No Impact
a. Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?    
b. Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire
or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
   
c. Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency
water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
   
d. Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
   
Discussion
a-d. The City’s Wildland Urban Interface map indicates that the project site is not located in a High or Very High FHSZ.50 Furthermore, CAL FIRE’s Fire and Resource Assessment program indicates that the project site is not located in a High or Very High FHSZ.51 The nearest Very High FHSZ is located approximately 0.75-mile to the west. The proposed project would be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the California Fire Code (CFC), as adopted by Chapter 15.44 of the City’s Municipal Code, including installation of fire sprinkler systems. In addition, the CBSC includes requirements related to fire hazards for new buildings. In compliance with the CBSC (specifically Section 903.2.11.5), an automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in commercial kitchen exhaust hood and duct systems. Such features would help to reduce the spread of fire.

As noted in Section IX, implementation of the proposed project would not interfere with potential evacuation or response routes used by emergency response teams. The project would not conflict with the City’s Emergency Operations Plan.52 In addition, the proposed project would not include any development on, or at the base of, a substantial slope. Thus, implementation of the proposed project would not exacerbate any existing conditions or hazards related to downslope flooding or landslides, slope instability, or drainage changes.

Therefore, the project area does not include any existing features that would substantially increase fire risk for future residents.

Given that the project site is located within a developed urban area and is situated adjacent to existing roads, water lines, and other utilities, the proposed project would not require the development of additional infrastructure, and, thus, would not result in substantial fire risks related to installation or maintenance of such infrastructure. Therefore, the proposed project would not be subject to substantial risks related to wildfires, and no impact would occur.
50 City of Morgan Hill. City of Morgan Hill Wildland Urban Interface Map. March 2009. 51 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Morgan Hill, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA.

Available at: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/5934/morgan_hill.pdf. Accessed April 2023. 52 City of Morgan Hill. Emergency Operations Plan. January 11, 2018.

Page 416 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A at 18599 Sutter Boulevard Project
Initial Study

Page 89 ends

July 2023
XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less-ThanSignificant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less-ThanSignificant
Impact
No
Impact
a. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, substantially reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
   
b. Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
   
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
   
Discussion
a. As discussed in Section IV, Biological Resources, of this Initial Study, the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts to rare, threatened or endangered species. In addition, the site does not contain known historical or cultural resources. Although unlikely, the possibility exists that grading and other construction activities associated with the site could unearth deposits of cultural significance. However, this Initial Study explains how the City’s Municipal Code requires standard measures for development projects that would ensure no impacts to such resources would occur. Therefore, the proposed project would result in no impact related to degradation of the quality of the environment, substantial reduction of habitat or plant and wildlife species, and elimination of important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. b. As demonstrated in this Initial Study, the proposed project would not result in any significant environmental impacts, through compliance with applicable General Plan policies and Municipal Code standards, as well as other applicable local and State regulations. For this reason, as well as due to the project’s relatively small increase in traffic, noise, air pollutant emissions, and demand for utilities and service systems, the project’s incremental contribution towards cumulative impacts in the area would not be cumulatively considerable. Therefore, when viewed in conjunction with other closely related past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects, development of the proposed project would not substantially contribute to cumulative impacts in the City of Morgan Hill, and no impact would occur.
c. The project site would be developed in a generally urbanized and built-up area of the City of Morgan Hill. As discussed throughout this Initial Study, development of the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse impacts to human beings, either directly or indirectly. Specifically, as discussed in Section III, Air Quality, Section VIII, GHG Emissions, Section IX, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Section XIII, Noise, and Section XVII, Transportation, of this Initial Study, the proposed project would not cause substantial adverse effects to human beings, including effects related to exposure to air pollutants, GHG, hazardous materials, noise, and traffic. As such, no impact would result.

Page 417 of 817 ends

Memorandum
Date: June 23, 2023
To: Nick Pappani, Raney Planning & Management
From: Robert Del Rio, T.E., Luis Descanzo
Subject: Trip Generation and Operations Analysis for the Proposed 18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A in Morgan Hill, California
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. has completed a trip generation and operations analysis for the proposed Chick-Fil-A restaurant located at 18599 Sutter Boulevard (APN 726-32-002) in Morgan Hill, California (see Figure 1). The site is currently occupied by a vacant restaurant. As proposed, the project would consist of a 5,028 s.f. Chick-Fil-A restaurant with two drive-through lanes. Vehicular access would be provided via an existing full-access driveway along Sutter Boulevard and a proposed right-in-only access driveway along Cochrane Road.

The methodology, results, and recommendations of the analysis are discussed below.

Scope of Study
The current General Plan, Morgan Hill 2035 General Plan, adopted in July 2016 uses Level of Service (LOS) as its primary metric for the evaluation of the projected operation of the City’s roadway system.

Therefore, this traffic operations analysis which includes a peak hour intersection level of service analysis is included for consistency with the General Plan goals and policies. The traffic operations analysis supplements the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required VMT analysis provided in a separate memorandum. However, the determination of project impacts per CEQA requirements is based solely on the VMT analysis.

The purposes of the trip generation and operations analysis is to evaluate the magnitude of traffic that would be added to the roadway system due to the proposed project and to determine whether a comprehensive traffic study is required for the proposed project. The analysis consists of an estimation of project trip generation and evaluation peak-hour intersection level of service analysis at intersections in the immediate vicinity of the project site. A review of the project’s site access per the proposed site plan also is included. Traffic conditions were evaluated for the scenarios listed below.

Existing Conditions. Existing conditions represent the existing peak-hour traffic volumes on the existing roadway network. Existing traffic volumes at the study intersections (except for three intersections) were derived from traffic counts collected in May 2018, to which a 1.5% annual growth factor was applied to represent existing conditions in 2023. New turning movement counts were conducted at three study intersections (Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Road, Woodview Avenue/Cochrane Road, Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza) in March 2023, to account for traffic generated by newly-built commercial uses within the Evergreen Village development. The new counts also account for changes to the roadway network since 2018 as a result of access improvements to Evergreen Village, such as signalization of the Woodview Avenue/Cochrane Road Item 4
Attachment 6

Page 418 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 2
Figure 1
Site Location
Cochrane Rd Cochrane Rd
Madrone Pkwy Madrone Pkwy
Monterey Rd Monterey Rd
Butterfield Blvd Butterfield Blvd
Dunne Ave Dunne Ave
101
NORTH
Not to Scale
= Project Site Location
= City of Morgan Hill
LEGEND:

Skipper Ln Skipper Ln Woodview Ave Woodview AveSutter Blvd Sutter Blvd

Page 419 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 3
Figure 2 Site Plan and Project Trips at Site Access Points

SUTTER BOULEVARD
(PUBLIC STREET)

COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT COMPACT

EV READY EV READY
Chick-fil-A
5200 Buffington Road
Atlanta, Georgia
30349-2998
C2.1
LEGEND
NORTH

VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.

PROJECT SITE

SITE INFORMATIONEASEMENT NOTES

PARKING REQUIREMENTS

BUILDING AREA
(SF)
*REQUIRED

PARKING STALLS

TOTAL PROVIDED

PARKING STALLS

PROVIDED

COMPACT

PARKING STALLS
(30% MAX)

REQUIRED

BICYCLE PARKING

PROVIDED
BICYCLE PARKING **ADA REQUIRED ADA PROVIDED
***EV CAPABLE
STALLS

REQUIRED

EV CAPABLE
STALLS

PROVIDED
= Inbound Path
= AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
= Outbound Path
LEGEND
XX(XX)
19(37)
35(69)
14(28)
31(62)
3(5)
22(44)
24(47) 6(12) 11(22)
1(3)
1(2)

Page 420 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 4
Intersection, a new internal drive aisle connection to the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection, and new driveways along Jarvis Drive and Butterfield Boulevard.

A comparison of factored volumes and new counts showed that factored volumes along eastbound and westbound Cochrane Road were generally higher than the new counts during the AM and PM peak-hours. It can therefore be assumed that factored volumes are a conservative estimate of 2023 traffic volumes. However, factored volumes at the intersection of Madrone Parkway/Cochrane Road showed 150 fewer vehicles in the eastbound direction during the AM peak-hour compared to the new counts collected at the upstream intersection of Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Road. Therefore, volumes at the intersections of Madrone Parkway/Cochrane Road, US 101 Southbound Ramps/Cochrane Road, and US 101 Northbound Ramps/Cochrane Road were adjusted by adding 150 vehicles in the eastbound direction during the AM peak-hour.

Existing Plus Project Conditions. Existing plus project peak-hour traffic volumes were estimated by adding to the existing traffic volumes the additional traffic that would be generated by the proposed project. Existing plus project conditions were evaluated relative to existing conditions in order to determine the effects of the proposed project on existing traffic conditions.

Year 2030 Cumulative Conditions. Year 2030 Cumulative conditions represent future traffic volumes on the existing transportation network. Year 2030 Cumulative conditions include traffic growth projected to occur in the Year 2030 without the proposed project.

Year 2030 Cumulative with Project Conditions. Year 2030 Cumulative with Project conditions consists of 2030 Cumulative traffic conditions with the addition of project traffic.

Project Trip Generation Estimates and Assignment
In determining the project trip generation, the magnitude of traffic entering and existing the site is estimated for the AM and PM peak hours. Peak-hour trip generation for the proposed fast-food restaurant with drive-through window was estimated utilizing trip generation rates that were determined based on vehicular counts at three existing Chick-fil-A restaurants with two drive-through lanes and of comparable square footage as that of the proposed project. The trip surveys were completed between February 18, 2023 and February 25, 2023 at the following three locations:
 Pittsburg, CA – 4717 Century Boulevard (4.99 k.s.f.)
 Milpitas, CA – 755 E. Calaveras Boulevard (4.96 k.s.f.)  Daly City, CA – 6 Serramonte Center (4.92 k.s.f.)
Daily trip generation was estimated based on the surveyed peak-hour trips and the ratio of peak-hour trips to daily trips for a fast-food restaurant with drive-through window (Land Use 934) published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The results of each survey, shown on Table 1, were utilized to calculate average peak hour trip rates. Using these average rates, the project is estimated to produce 1,822 daily vehicle trips with 101 AM peak-hour trips 52 inbound and 49 outbound) and 201 PM peak-hour trips (101 inbound and 97 outbound) before any reductions.

Fast-food restaurants with drive-through windows attract a substantial number of pass-by trips, which are trips made by drivers who already pass by the project site on an adjacent street en route to another destination, such as work to home. In contrast, primary (non-pass-by) trips are new trips made for the sole purpose of visiting the project site. Thus, pass-by trips are not considered new trips that are generated by the project site. However, the attraction of pass-by trips does result in a reassignment of existing through traffic (i.e. along Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard) at site driveways and

Page 421 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 5
Table 1 Trip Survey Summary
Survey Location1 Size (ksf)
Rate In Out Total Rate In Out Total
Pittsburg - 4717 Century Blvd 4.99 19.86 54 45 99 34.90 89 85 174Milpitas - 755 E Calaveras Blvd 4.96 13.30 30 36 66 31.24 92 63 155Daly City - 6 Serramonte Center 4.92 27.03 69 64 133 54.07 126 140 266Survey Average 4.96 20.06 51 48 99 40.07 102 96 198 ITE 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through 4.96 44.61 113 108 221 33.03 85 79 164 Notes:
1 Peak-hour trips are based on trip survey counts conducted February 18, 2023 to February 25, 2023.

AM Peak-Hour PM Peak-Hour

Page 422 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 6
intersections immediately adjacent to the project site. A 50 percent pass-by reduction was assumed for the estimated daily, AM peak-hour, and PM peak-hour trips. After subtracting pass-by trips, the project is expected to generate 911 primary vehicle trips per day, with 51 primary vehicle trips (26 inbound and 25 outbound) in the AM peak hour and 100 primary vehicle trips (52 inbound and 48 outbound) in the PM peak hour. Because the existing commercial building on the project site is currently vacant, no trip credits are applied for the existing commercial space. Trip generation estimates for the proposed project are shown in Table 2.

The directional distribution of site-generated traffic to and from the project site was estimated based on the existing travel patterns on the surrounding roadway network that reflect typical weekday AM and PM peak commute patterns, the location of the project driveways, freeway access points, and the locations of complimentary land uses. The peak-hour project trips associated with the proposed project were added to the transportation network in accordance with the distribution pattern. The project trip distribution pattern and assignment of project trips at the study intersections under existing plus project conditions are shown on Figure 3.

Year 2030 Cumulative Conditions Project Trip Generation Estimates Analysis under cumulative conditions is based on the General Plan traffic model which assumes no new development on the project site.

Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Traffic conditions at the following study intersections were analyzed for the weekday AM and PM peak hours of traffic:

1. Monterey Road and Cochrane Road

2. Butterfield Boulevard and Cochrane Road

3. Woodview Avenue/Skipper Lane and Cochrane Road

4. Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Road

5. Madrone Parkway/Cochrane Plaza and Cochrane Road

6. US 101 Southbound Ramps and Cochrane Road

7. US 101 Northbound Ramps and Cochrane Road

8. Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Plaza
Other intersections in the project area were not studied because the addition of project trips will be minimal, less than 10 peak hour trips per lane. The weekday AM peak hour of traffic generally falls within the 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM period and the weekday PM peak hour is typically in the 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM period. It is during these times that the most congested traffic conditions occur on a typical weekday.

Signalized Intersection Analysis
Signalized study intersections are subject to the City of Morgan Hill's level of service standards. The City of Morgan Hill's level of service methodology is TRAFFIX, which is based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method for signalized intersections. TRAFFIX evaluates signalized intersections operations based on average delay time for all vehicles at the intersection. Since TRAFFIX is also the CMP-designated intersection level of service methodology, the City of Morgan Hill methodology employs the CMP defaults values for the analysis parameters, which include adjusted saturation flow rates to reflect conditions in Santa Clara County. All intersections within the City of Morgan Hill are required to meet the City’s LOS standard of LOS D, with the exception of the following:

Page 423 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 7
Table 2 Trip Generation Summary
Land Use Size (ksf)
Rate Trips Rate In Out Total Rate In Out Total
Proposed ProjectChick-Fil-A with Drive-Through1 5.03 362.34 1,822 20.06 52 49 101 40.07 104 97 201 Pass-by Reduction (50%) 2 -911 -26 -24 -50 -52 -49 -101 Net Project Trips 911 26 25 51 52 48 100Notes:
1 Peak-hour trips are based on trip survey counts conducted February 18, 2023 to February 25, 2023.

Daily trips are based on surveyed peak-hour trips and the ratio of peak-hour trips to daily trips published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition for Land Use Code 934: Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Through. 2 Peak-hour pass-by trip reduction percentage assumed to be 50% of daily, AM peak-hour, and PM peak-hour trips.

Daily AM Peak-Hour PM Peak-Hour

Page 424 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 8
Figure 3
Project Trip Distribution and Project Trip Assignment
Cochrane Rd Cochrane Rd
Madrone Pkwy Madrone Pkwy
Sutter Blvd Sutter Blvd
Butterfield Blvd Butterfield Blvd
101
NORTH
Not to Scale
Hale Ave
Hale Ave
Monterey Rd Monterey Rd
= Project Site Location
= Study Intersection
= City of Morgan Hill
LEGEND:

X
X
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
Skipper Ln Skipper Ln Woodview Ave Woodview Ave
Llagas Rd Llagas Rd
1 5%
8%
20 %
20 2
0 %
%
1%
1%
5%
5%
1 5%
4 5
3 2
6 7
8

Page 425 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 9
 LOS F for Downtown intersections and segments including at Main/Monterey, along Monterey Road between Main and Fifth Street, and along Depot Street at First through Fifth Street;  LOS E for the following intersections and freeway zones:
 Main Avenue and Del Monte Avenue
 Main Avenue and Depot Street
 Dunne Avenue and Del Monte Avenue
 Dunne Avenue and Monterey Avenue
 Dunne Avenue and Church Street
 Dunne Avenue and Depot Street
 Cochrane Road and Monterey Road
 Tennant Avenue and Monterey Road
 Tennant Avenue and Butterfield Boulevard
 Cochrane Road Freeway Zone: from Madrone Parkway/Cochrane Plaza to Cochrane Road/DePaul Drive
 Dunne Avenue Freeway Zone: from Walnut Grove Drive/East Dunne Avenue to Condit Road/East Dunne Avenue
 Tennant Avenue Freeway Zone: from Butterfield Boulevard/Tennant Avenue to Condit Road/Tennant Avenue
According to the City of Morgan Hill level of service guidelines, a development is said to create a significant adverse effect on traffic conditions at a signalized intersection if for either peak hour:

1. The level of service at the intersection degrades from an acceptable level (LOS D or LOS E as identified above) under no project conditions to an unacceptable level (LOS E or F) under project conditions, or

2. The level of service at the intersection is an unacceptable level (LOS E or F as identified above) under no project conditions and the addition of project trips causes the average critical delay to increase by four (4) or more seconds and the volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) to increase by 0.01.

An exception to this rule applies when the addition of project traffic reduces the amount of average delay for critical movements (i.e., the change in average delay for critical movements is negative). In this case, the threshold of significance is an increase in the critical V/C value by 0.01 or more.

Unsignalized Intersection Analysis
Unsignalized intersections within the City of Morgan Hill have a minimum operating level of LOS D.

According to the City of Morgan Hill level of service guidelines, a development is said to have a significant adverse impact on traffic conditions at an unsignalized intersection if for either peak hour the addition of project traffic causes the worst approach delay to degrade to LOS E or F and the traffic volumes at the intersection are sufficiently high to satisfy the peak hour volume warrant.

Level of Service Results
The results of the intersection level of service analysis show that all study intersections currently operate at an acceptable LOS D or better conditions under existing conditions, and the addition of project traffic would not result in the degradation of the study intersections’ levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours under existing plus project conditions. In addition, the unsignalized study intersection of Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Plaza is projected to have traffic volumes that fall below the thresholds that warrant signalization under existing plus project conditions.

Under Year 2030 Cumulative conditions, all signalized study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service, and the addition of project traffic would not result in the degradation of

Page 426 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 10
the study intersections’ levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. Although the unsignalized study intersection of Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Plaza is projected to have a worst approach delay corresponding to an unacceptable LOS E during the PM peak-hour, traffic volumes would fall below the thresholds that warrant signalization under cumulative plus project conditions.

Based on the results of the intersection level of service analysis, the project would not have an adverse effect on operations at the study intersections. The results of level of service analysis are summarized in Table 3.

The poor operations at the Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Plaza intersection are reflective of delays experienced by drivers exiting the Cochrane Plaza (Walmart) parking lot and project driveway due to insufficient gaps in traffic flow along Sutter Boulevard during the peak hours. Turn movements from each of the driveways are inhibited given that there is no control of Sutter Boulevard traffic flow.

Recommendation: Operations could be improved at the Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Plaza intersection by restricting left-turns and through movements from each of the driveways at the intersection (east and west legs) by closing the median gap along Sutter Boulevard. As shown on Figure 4, the median could be constructed to maintain left-turns from Sutter Boulevard to each of the driveways.

Intersection Queueing Analysis
The analysis of intersection level of service was supplemented with an analysis of intersection operations for selected intersections where the project would add a significant number of left-turning vehicles. The operations analysis is based on vehicle queuing for high demand left-turn movements at intersections. Vehicle queues were estimated using a Poisson probability distribution, which estimates the probability of “n” vehicles for a vehicle movement using the following formula:

P (x=n) = n e – (
n!
Where:

P (x=n) = probability of “n” vehicles in queue per lane n = number of vehicles in the queue per lane
Average number of vehicles in the queue per lane (vehicles per hour per lane/signal cycles per hour)
The basis of the analysis is as follows: (1) the Poisson probability distribution is used to estimate the 95th percentile maximum number of queued vehicles per cycle for a particular movement; (2) the estimated maximum number of vehicles in the queue is translated into a queue length, assuming 25 feet per vehicle; and (3) the estimated maximum queue length is compared to the existing or planned available storage capacity for the movement. This analysis thus provides a basis for estimating future left-turn storage requirements at intersections. The 95th percentile queue length value indicates that during the peak hour, a queue of this length or less would occur on 95 percent of the signal cycles.

Likewise, a queue length larger than the 95th percentile queue would only occur on 5 percent of the signal cycles (about 3 cycles during the peak hour for a signal with a 60-second cycle length).

Therefore, left-turn storage pocket designs based on the 95th percentile queue length would ensure that storage space would be exceeded only 5 percent of the time. The 95th percentile queue length is also known as the “design queue length”.

The vehicle queue estimates and a tabulated summary of the findings are provided in Table 4. The queueing analysis shows that all high-demand movements would continue to have sufficient queueing storage space with the addition of project traffic.

Page 427 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 11
Table 3 Intersection Level of Service Summary
Int. Int. LOS Peak Count Warrant Warrant Incr. In Incr. In Warrant Warrant Incr. In Incr. In # Intersection Control Std Hour Date Met? Delay1 LOS Met? Delay1 LOS Crit. Delay Crit. V/C Met? Delay1 LOS Met? Delay1 LOS Crit. Delay Crit. V/C 1 Monterey Road Signal E AM 05/08/18 -- 37.7 D -- 37.7 D 0.1 0.002 -- 71.2 E -- 71.6 E 0.7 0.002 and Cochrane Road PM 05/08/18 -- 26.5 C -- 26.7 C 1.2 0.038 -- 44.4 D -- 45.0 D 1.2 0.004 2 Butterfield Boulevard Signal D AM 05/08/18 -- 12.5 B -- 12.5 B 0.0 0.001 -- 13.0 B -- 13.0 B 0.0 0.001 and Cochrane Road PM 05/08/18 -- 12.1 B -- 12.0 B -0.1 -0.002 -- 15.5 B -- 15.4 B -0.1 -0.002 3 Woodview Avenue/Skipper Lane Signal D AM 03/07/23 -- 17.2 B -- 17.3 B 0.2 0.007 -- 16.4 B -- 16.4 B 0.1 0.007 and Cochrane Road PM 03/07/23 -- 17.0 B -- 17.2 B 0.7 0.013 -- 16.6 B -- 16.8 B 0.3 0.013 4 Sutter Boulevard Signal D AM 03/07/23 -- 16.8 B -- 17.0 B 0.4 0.006 -- 17.8 B -- 18.0 B 0.4 0.006 and Cochrane Road PM 03/07/23 -- 17.7 B -- 18.1 B 1.0 0.012 -- 17.6 B -- 19.9 B 2.8 0.207 5 Madrone Parkway/Cochrane Plaza Signal E AM 05/08/18 -- 19.2 B -- 19.1 B -0.1 0.003 -- 19.4 B -- 19.4 B 0.0 0.000 and Cochrane Road PM 05/08/18 -- 32.1 C -- 32.0 C -0.1 0.004 -- 33.2 C -- 33.5 C 0.6 -0.009 6 US 101 Southbound Ramps Signal E AM 05/08/18 -- 13.4 B -- 13.4 B 0.0 0.002 -- 16.2 B -- 16.3 B 0.1 0.002 and Cochrane Road PM 05/08/18 -- 17.2 B -- 17.3 B 0.1 0.006 -- 26.1 C -- 26.6 C 0.9 0.006 7 US 101 Northbound Ramps Signal E AM 05/08/18 -- 8.8 A -- 8.8 A 0.0 0.002 -- 8.0 A -- 8.1 A 0.1 0.002 and Cochrane Road PM 05/08/18 -- 11.5 B -- 11.6 B 0.1 0.004 -- 12.4 B -- 12.5 B 0.1 0.004 8 Sutter Boulevard TWSC D AM 03/07/23 No 14.0 B No 14.3 B N/A N/A No 15.6 C No 16.1 C N/A N/A and Cochrane Plaza PM 03/07/23 No 22.2 C No 24.5 C N/A N/A No 33.9 D No 39.4 E N/A N/A Notes:1The reported delay and corresponding level of service for signalized intersections represent the average delay for all approaches at the intersection.

The reported delay and corresponding level of service for one- and two-way stop-controlled intersections are based on the stop-controlled approach with the highest delay.

Existing Existing Plus Project
Year 2030 without
Project
Year 2030
with Project

Page 428 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 12
Figure 4 Proposed Sutter Boulevard Median Closure
Sutter Blvd
Proposed Median Closure
Cochrane Plaza
Project Site

Page 429 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 13
Table 4 Intersection Queueing Summary
Measurement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM
00 0
Existing ConditionsCycle Length/Control Delay (sec)1 60 60 60 60 60 75 7.7 7.5 9.9 13.4 Lanes 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Volume (vph) 204 151 359 378 50 25 8 4 8 35Volume (vphpl ) 102 76 359 378 50 25 8 4 8 3595th %. Queue (veh/ln.) 4 3 10 11 2 2 0 0 0 1 95th %. Queue (ft./ln)2 100 75 250 275 50 50 0 0 0 25
Storage (ft./ ln.) 375 375 325 325 150 150 50 50 50 50Adequate (Y/N) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES 0 0 Existing Plus Project Conditions (with Evergreen Plaza)Cycle Length/Control Delay (sec)1 60 60 60 60 60 75 7.9 7.8 13.4 18.8 Lanes 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Volume (vph) 277 234 407 471 145 145 17 19 74 143Volume (vphpl ) 139 117 407 471 145 145 17 19 74 14395th %. Queue (veh/ln.) 5 5 11 13 5 6 0 0 1 2 95th %. Queue (ft./ln)2 125 125 275 325 125 150 0 0 25 50 Storage (ft./ ln.) 375 375 325 325 150 150 50 50 50 50Adequate (Y/N) YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! 0 0 0 0 Notes:1 Cycle length for signalized intersections and control delay for stop-controlled intersections.2 Assumes 25 feet per vehicle queued Woodview Avenue/Skipper
Lane and Cochrane Road
Northbound Left/Through
Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Road Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Plaza Westbound Left Northbound Left Northbound Right Eastbound

Page 430 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 14
Site Access
The evaluation of site access is based on the site plan prepared by Kimley-Horn dated February 14, 2023. Site access was evaluated to determine the adequacy of the site’s access points with regard to the following: traffic volume, geometric design, and sight distance. Site access was evaluated in accordance with generally accepted traffic engineering standards and transportation planning principles.

As shown on Figure 2, primary vehicular access to the project site would be provided via an existing full-access driveway located at the west leg of the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection. The driveway along Sutter Boulevard currently serves the subject property and an existing commercial/office use located southeast of the project site (18525 Sutter Boulevard) via a shared easement drive aisle. As proposed, a two-way access point to the project site would be constructed along the easement drive aisle, approximately 190 feet west of Sutter Boulevard. The access point would be directly opposite from the westernmost access point to 18525 Sutter Boulevard. It should be noted that the shared easement drive aisle also provides vehicular access to the Evergreen Village development, located west of the project site. Therefore, project traffic would have access to roadways and intersections within and adjacent to Evergreen Village. Trips generated by Evergreen Village are included in this site access analysis, based on trips published in the Cochrane & Butterfield Mixed-Use Development TIA by Hexagon, dated June 7, 2018. It should be noted that the study did not assume a direct connection between Evergreen Village and the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection.

Therefore, trips published in the Cochrane & Butterfield Mixed-Use Development TIA were manually adjusted to reflect usage of the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza driveway.

A secondary ingress-only access point is proposed along Cochrane Road, approximately 190 feet west of Sutter Boulevard and 190 feet east of an existing right-in/right-out only driveway. An existing landscaped median along Cochrane Road would prohibit inbound and outbound left-turns to and from the proposed project driveway.

Driveway Operations
Sutter Boulevard Driveway
The project parcel is currently served by three access points along the shared easement drive aisle.

The proposed project will eliminate the two easternmost access points and condense access to the project site to one point at its western boundary from the drive aisle.

The project trip estimates and assignment indicates a maximum of 17 PM peak-hour trips would make inbound left-turns from northbound Sutter Boulevard into the project’s easement driveway. As shown in the queueing analysis, the northbound left-turn pocket at the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection would have adequate storage space to serve traffic volumes under existing plus project conditions.

A maximum of 68 PM peak-hour project trips (103 trips including existing trips and 143 trips including Evergreen Village trips) would exit via the project’s easement driveway onto Sutter Boulevard. As shown in the queueing analysis, the outbound (eastbound) movement would have a maximum queue length of 2 vehicles. Therefore, there would be adequate storage space to serve outbound traffic volumes without blocking access to the 18525 Sutter Boulevard parking lot under existing plus project conditions.

However, as noted in the intersection level of service discussion above, it is recommended that the closure of the median gap along Sutter Boulevard be implemented to improve operations at the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection (see Figure 4). The median gap closure would restrict turn

Page 431 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 15
movements from the Sutter Boulevard driveway to right-turns only and require project trips that are bound for northbound Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Road to utilize Skipper Lane rather than Sutter Boulevard. Thus, right-turn only signs should be placed at the project site driveway along the drive aisle.

In addition, the project should coordinate with the City to determine if closure of the drive aisle access to 18525 Sutter Boulevard directly across from the project site entrance would be feasible. Doing so would restrict project trips from utilizing 18525 Sutter Boulevard as a cut-through route to/from Jarvis Drive. However, implementation of a median within the shared drive aisle easement may require additional roadway width than currently provided and may also restrict vehicular access between the surrounding roadway network and 18525 Sutter Boulevard.

Cochrane Road Driveway
The Cochrane Road driveway is not anticipated to experience operational issues due to being an ingress-only driveway. Providing egress from the Cochrane Road driveway is not recommended due to the following:
 adequate outbound access from the project site onto eastbound Cochrane Road would be provided via Sutter Boulevard and Skipper Lane
 outbound vehicles would turn onto a right-turn only lane along Cochrane Road and would need to merge into the adjacent travel lane to continue eastbound along Cochrane Road  an existing bike lane merges with the right-turn lane at the location of the proposed driveway Driveway Design
The City’s Design Standards specify a minimum driveway width of 16 feet and a maximum driveway width of 36 feet for commercial uses. The site plan indicates that the ingress-only Cochrane Road project driveway would be 22 feet wide, and would thus meet City standards. The proposed 35-foot wide two-way access point along the southern project frontage would fall within the acceptable range of standard driveway widths. However, the access point is along a shared easement and is not subject to the City’s standard driveway requirements.

Drive-Through Operations
The proposed drive-through is comprised of two lanes, with each lane having its own ordering point.

During non-peak periods, customers will merge into a single lane as they proceed past the ordering canopy towards the pick-up window. During peak demand periods, customers will remain in two-lane configuration as staff members are deployed to deliver food to customers in the outside lane. When needed, the outside lane also would be used as a by-pass lane to prioritize customers with smaller orders through the drive-through sequence.

Each lane is shown to be 10 feet wide and will have their own entrance and exit points. The lanes will be separated by pavement markings and removable bollards. The site plan shows a maximum capacity for approximately 24 vehicles per lane, assuming 20 feet per car and full utilization of each lane.

Conformance with City Requirements for Drive-Through Facilities As proposed, the drive-through lanes will meet the City’s standard requirements for drive-through facilities (Morgan Hill Code of Ordinances, Chapter 18.92.040).  Drive-through lanes for fast food restaurants shall have a capacity for at least eight vehicles, at 20 feet per vehicle.

Page 432 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 16
The site plan shows storage space for approximately 24 vehicles per lane (48 vehicles total), assuming 20 feet per car. Thus, the proposed capacity would exceed minimum requirements.  Drive-through lanes shall be separate from the circulation lanes necessary for entering and exiting the property and providing access to parking.

The drive-through lanes are separate from the drive aisles serving the project’s surface parking lot. Drive-through operations would not interfere with ingress and egress of vehicles to/from the project site.
 Pedestrian access routes shall not cross a drive-through lane within the minimum stacking space distance (8 vehicles).

As shown on the site plan, pedestrian access routes will be located across the drive-through exits (past the drive-through window) and across both lanes, approximately 17 car-lengths back from the drive-through exits. Thus, the location of the proposed pedestrian access routes would meet minimum requirements.
 Vehicular entrance or exit to a drive-through establishment shall be setback from the nearest public street intersection.

The proposed Cochrane Road driveway would be located approximately 190 feet east of an existing right-in/right-out only driveway and 190 feet west of Sutter Boulevard. This meets the required separation of at least 115 feet for roadways with a posted speed limit of 45 mph without a median opening. The existing Sutter Boulevard driveway is located approximately 340 feet south of Cochrane Road and 340 feet north of Jarvis Drive. This meets the required separation of at least 150 feet for roadways with a posted speed limit of 35 mph with a median opening.

Queueing Observations
Vehicle queues were observed at three Chick-fil-A restaurants with two drive-through lanes during the weekday AM and PM peak-hours, as well as the Saturday lunchtime period, to confirm that the proposed drive-through storage would meet demand. The maximum queue observed during weekdays was a total of 29 vehicles across two drive-through lanes during the PM peak-hour, while the maximum queue observed during the Saturday lunchtime period was 38 vehicles. Thus, the proposed drivethrough with a total capacity for up to 48 vehicles is expected to have adequate capacity to accommodate expected queues during peak periods.

Based on the observed drive-through queues, it is unlikely that queues would exceed the planned drive-through capacity and queues are not expected to spill over onto Sutter Boulevard or Cochrane Road. However, Chick-Fil-A should develop a drive-through queue management plan that can be implemented during abnormally high demand periods to ensure that circulation within the site parking lot and on adjacent drive aisles would not be negatively affected by drive-through operations. The queue management plan could include but not be limited to measures utilized at other Chick-Fil-A locations:
 Having staff members monitor the drive-through queues and direct traffic as necessary if queues extend beyond the drive-through lanes.
 Implementing face-to-face ordering via an iPad ordering system during peak periods.  Utilizing the secondary drive-through lane as a by-pass lane to expedite service for customers with smaller orders.

Recommendation: The proposed drive-through is expected to have adequate capacity to accommodate the expected queues during peak periods. Drive-through queues are not expected to spill over onto Sutter Boulevard or Cochrane Road. However, it is recommended Chick-Fil-A develop a

Page 433 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 17
queue management plan that can be implemented during abnormally high demand periods to prevent the potential for the drive-through queues to inhibit circulation within the project parking lot and access of adjacent properties.

Parking
Vehicular Parking
According to the Planned Unit Development for the Morgan Hill Business Park, of which the project site is included, sites are required to provide on-site vehicular parking at a rate of 1 space per 60 s.f. of public accommodation and one space per 250 gross floor area of additional area.

Therefore, the proposed 5,028 s.f. fast-food restaurant would require a total of 45 vehicular parking spaces. Per the site plan, the project proposes a total of 46 on-site parking spaces. Therefore, vehicle parking as proposed by the project will meet the off-street parking requirement for the site.

Bicycle Parking
According to the City of Morgan Hill Zoning Regulations (Table 18.72-7), non-residential uses are required to provide on-site bicycle parking as specified below:
 Short-term spaces – 10% of required automobile spaces  Long-term spaces – 1 per 20 required automobile spaces for uses 10,000 s.f. or greater Based on these requirements, the project will be required to provide a total of 6 short-term bicycle parking spaces. The site plan shows bike lockers provided for at least 6 bicycles, located adjacent to the trash enclosure. Pedestrian access routes are provided between the bike lockers and the project frontages along Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Road. Therefore, bicycle parking as proposed by the project will meet City bicycle parking requirements.

Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Facility Evaluation
Transit Facilities
The project site is served by VTA bus routes that run along Cochrane Road.  Rapid Route 568 (Gilroy Transit Center to San Jose Diridon Transit Center) serves bus stops at the intersection of Cochrane Road and Cochrane Circle, approximately 1/3-mile walking distance from the project site.
 Express Route 121 (Gilroy/Morgan Hill to Lockheed Martin) serves bus stops at the intersection of Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard, less than 200 feet walking distance from the project site.
 Local Route 87 (Morgan Hill Civic Center to Burnett Avenue) serves bus stops at the intersection of Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard, less than 200 feet walking distance from the project site.

The transit ridership demands of the proposed project can be accommodated by the existing transit facilities.

Pedestrian Facilities
In the vicinity of the project site, there are existing sidewalks along all public roadways, including Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Road. Sidewalks along roadways within Evergreen Village are currently missing along undeveloped parcels but will be constructed with their development.

Page 434 of 817 ends

18599 Sutter Boulevard Chick-Fil-A Trip Generation and Operations Analysis June 23, 2023 Page | 18
Crosswalks with protected crossing phases are provided along all four legs of the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Road intersection. No crosswalks or ADA-compliant curb ramps are provided along any of the approaches at the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection. However, a crosswalk across Sutter Boulevard is provided at the Sutter Boulevard/Jarvis Drive intersection, approximately 340 feet south of the project site.

Project Improvements
The project proposes to reconstruct existing sidewalks along the Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard project frontages. A new sidewalk will be constructed along the easement drive to the south of the project site, providing a continuous pedestrian route between Sutter Boulevard and Evergreen Village.

Multiple access points from the sidewalks are provided to on-site walkways. All sidewalks are shown on the site plan to measure at least 5 feet wide.

Additionally, new ADA-compliant curb ramps will be installed at the southwest corner of the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Road intersection, at the northwest corner of the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection, along the proposed project driveways, and at on-site pedestrian crossings across drive-through lanes.

Overall, the proposed sidewalks and curb ramps create an accessible network of pedestrian pathways to/from the project site and surrounding uses. A continuous, accessible pedestrian route would be provided between the project site and bus stops at the intersection of Cochrane Road/Sutter Boulevard.

However, It should be noted that pedestrian access to areas south and east of the project site would be constrained due to missing crosswalks and ADA-compliant curb ramps along any of the approaches at the Sutter Boulevard/Cochrane Plaza intersection. The proposed new curb ramp located at the northwest corner of the intersection cannot serve as part of an accessible route due to the missing facilities which are not the responsibility of the proposed project.

Bicycle Facilities
In the project vicinity, there are bike lanes located along Sutter Boulevard and Cochrane Road. The demand generated by the proposed project could be accommodated by the existing bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project site. Additionally, the project as proposed will not conflict with any existing or planned bicycle facilities.

Page 435 of 817 ends

Bay Area AQMD Air District, Mitigation Report
Construction Mitigation Summary
Phase ROG NOx CO SO2
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFFROAD Equipment Mitigation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard
Item 4
Attachment 7

Page 436 of 817 ends

Equipment Type Fuel Type Tier Number Mitigated Total Number of Equipment DPF Oxidation Catalyst Air Compressors Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Cranes Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Forklifts Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Generator Sets Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Graders Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00
Pavers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Paving Equipment Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Rollers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00
Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel No Change 0 3 No Change 0.00 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel No Change 0 8 No Change 0.00 Welders Diesel No Change 0 3 No Change 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 437 of 817 ends

Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated tons/yr Unmitigated mt/yr
Air Compressors 1.76100E-002 1.18440E-001 1.80970E-001 3.00000E-004 5.65000E-003 5.65000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.55325E+001 2.55325E+001 1.42000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.55680E+001 Cement and
Mortar Mixers

2.20000E-004 1.38000E-003 1.16000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.00000E-005 5.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 1.71850E-001 1.71850E-001 2.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 1.72300E-001 Concrete/Industria
l Saws

3.13000E-003 2.41400E-002 3.65000E-002 6.00000E-005 1.11000E-003 1.11000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.37656E+000 5.37656E+000 2.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.38295E+000 Cranes 2.42800E-002 2.52230E-001 1.31900E-001 4.30000E-004 1.05800E-002 9.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.80212E+001 3.80212E+001 1.23000E-002 0.00000E+000 3.83286E+001 Forklifts 6.83000E-003 6.42200E-002 8.52700E-002 1.10000E-004 3.60000E-003 3.31000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.00719E+001 1.00719E+001 3.26000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.01533E+001 Generator Sets 2.77200E-002 2.48190E-001 3.66200E-001 6.60000E-004 1.04300E-002 1.04300E-002 0.00000E+000 5.65208E+001 5.65208E+001 2.20000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.65758E+001 Graders 1.06000E-003 1.24700E-002 4.97000E-003 2.00000E-005 4.00000E-004 3.70000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.74318E+000 1.74318E+000 5.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.75727E+000 Pavers 6.90000E-004 6.53000E-003 1.08500E-002 2.00000E-005 3.10000E-004 2.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.54844E+000 1.54844E+000 5.00000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.56096E+000 Paving Equipment 8.20000E-004 7.48000E-003 1.28500E-002 2.00000E-005 3.60000E-004 3.30000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.78927E+000 1.78927E+000 5.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.80373E+000 Rollers 6.40000E-004 6.67000E-003 8.09000E-003 1.00000E-005 3.50000E-004 3.20000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.00869E+000 1.00869E+000 3.30000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.01684E+000 Rubber Tired
Dozers

8.95000E-003 9.17700E-002 4.03100E-002 1.10000E-004 4.13000E-003 3.80000E-003 0.00000E+000 9.65914E+000 9.65914E+000 3.12000E-003 0.00000E+000 9.73724E+000 Tractors/Loaders/
Backhoes

1.61100E-002 1.62260E-001 2.55790E-001 3.60000E-004 7.22000E-003 6.64000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.13536E+001 3.13536E+001 1.01400E-002 0.00000E+000 3.16071E+001 Welders 6.87300E-002 4.09350E-001 4.97590E-001 7.70000E-004 1.34100E-002 1.34100E-002 0.00000E+000 5.64662E+001 5.64662E+001 5.60000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.66061E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 438 of 817 ends

Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Mitigated tons/yr Mitigated mt/yr
Air Compressors 1.76100E-002 1.18440E-001 1.80970E-001 3.00000E-004 5.65000E-003 5.65000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.55325E+001 2.55325E+001 1.42000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.55679E+001 Cement and Mortar
Mixers

2.20000E-004 1.38000E-003 1.16000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.00000E-005 5.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 1.71850E-001 1.71850E-001 2.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 1.72300E-001 Concrete/Industrial
Saws

3.13000E-003 2.41400E-002 3.65000E-002 6.00000E-005 1.11000E-003 1.11000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.37656E+000 5.37656E+000 2.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.38294E+000 Cranes 2.42800E-002 2.52230E-001 1.31900E-001 4.30000E-004 1.05800E-002 9.74000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.80211E+001 3.80211E+001 1.23000E-002 0.00000E+000 3.83285E+001 Forklifts 6.83000E-003 6.42200E-002 8.52700E-002 1.10000E-004 3.60000E-003 3.31000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.00718E+001 1.00718E+001 3.26000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.01533E+001 Generator Sets 2.77200E-002 2.48190E-001 3.66200E-001 6.60000E-004 1.04300E-002 1.04300E-002 0.00000E+000 5.65207E+001 5.65207E+001 2.20000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.65758E+001 Graders 1.06000E-003 1.24700E-002 4.97000E-003 2.00000E-005 4.00000E-004 3.70000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.74317E+000 1.74317E+000 5.60000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.75727E+000 Pavers 6.90000E-004 6.53000E-003 1.08500E-002 2.00000E-005 3.10000E-004 2.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.54843E+000 1.54843E+000 5.00000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.56095E+000 Paving Equipment 8.20000E-004 7.48000E-003 1.28500E-002 2.00000E-005 3.60000E-004 3.30000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.78926E+000 1.78926E+000 5.80000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.80373E+000 Rollers 6.40000E-004 6.67000E-003 8.09000E-003 1.00000E-005 3.50000E-004 3.20000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.00869E+000 1.00869E+000 3.30000E-004 0.00000E+000 1.01684E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 8.95000E-003 9.17700E-002 4.03100E-002 1.10000E-004 4.13000E-003 3.80000E-003 0.00000E+000 9.65913E+000 9.65913E+000 3.12000E-003 0.00000E+000 9.73723E+000 Tractors/Loaders/Ba
ckhoes

1.61100E-002 1.62260E-001 2.55790E-001 3.60000E-004 7.22000E-003 6.64000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.13535E+001 3.13535E+001 1.01400E-002 0.00000E+000 3.16071E+001 Welders 6.87300E-002 4.09350E-001 4.97590E-001 7.70000E-004 1.34100E-002 1.34100E-002 0.00000E+000 5.64661E+001 5.64661E+001 5.60000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.66060E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 439 of 817 ends

Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction
Air Compressors 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17497E-006 1.17497E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17334E-006 Cement and Mortar
Mixers

0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Concrete/Industrial
Saws

0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.85772E-006 Cranes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.05205E-006 1.05205E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.04361E-006 Forklifts 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.92866E-007 9.92866E-007 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.84903E-007 Generator Sets 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23848E-006 1.23848E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.06052E-006 Graders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 5.73664E-006 5.73664E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Pavers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 6.45811E-006 6.45811E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 6.40631E-006 Paving Equipment 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 5.58887E-006 5.58887E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rollers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.03529E-006 1.03529E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.02699E-006 Tractors/Loaders/Ba
ckhoes

0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.56829E-007 9.56829E-007 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.49154E-007 Welders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23968E-006 1.23968E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23662E-006 Fugitive Dust Mitigation
No Soil Stabilizer for unpaved
Roads
PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
Yes/No Mitigation Measure Mitigation Input Mitigation Input Mitigation Input CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 440 of 817 ends

No Replace Ground Cover of Area
Disturbed
PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction
No Water Exposed Area PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Frequency (per day)
No Unpaved Road Mitigation Moisture Content
%
Vehicle Speed
(mph)

0.00 No Clean Paved Road % PM Reduction 0.00
Operational Percent Reduction Summary
Unmitigated Mitigated Percent Reduction
Phase Source PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5
Architectural Coating Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Architectural Coating Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Roads 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Demolition Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Grading Fugitive Dust 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
Grading Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paving Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Paving Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Site Preparation Fugitive Dust 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 441 of 817 ends

Category ROG NOx CO SO2
Exhaust
PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5 Bio- CO2
NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Percent Reduction
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Natural Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Indoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.22 Water Outdoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operational Mobile Mitigation
Mitigation
Selected
No
No
No
No
No
No
Category
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
Land Use
% Reduction

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.25

0.00 0.00

0.10 Input Value 1

0.31 Measure Input Value 2 Input Value 3
Increase Diversity
Land Use SubTotal
Integrate Below Market Rate Housing
Increase Transit Accessibility
Improve Destination Accessibility
Improve Walkability Design
Increase Density
Project Setting:

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 442 of 817 ends

No
No
No Neighborhood Enhancements
Neighborhood Enhancements
Neighborhood Enhancements
Implement NEV Network 0.00
Provide Traffic Calming Measures
Improve Pedestrian Network
No
No
No
No
No
No
Parking Policy Pricing
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Transit Improvements
Parking Policy Pricing
Parking Policy Pricing
Parking Policy Pricing
Neighborhood Enhancements 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Limit Parking Supply 0.00
Land Use and Site Enhancement Subtotal
Transit Improvements Subtotal
Increase Transit Frequency
Expand Transit Network
Provide BRT System
Parking Policy Pricing Subtotal
On-street Market Pricing
Unbundle Parking Costs
Neighborhood Enhancements Subtotal
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute
Commute

0.00 0.00

0.00 2.00
Transit Subsidy
Employee Vanpool/Shuttle
Market Commute Trip Reduction Option
Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative
Work Schedules
Workplace Parking Charge
Implement Employee Parking "Cash Out"
Implement Trip Reduction Program
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 443 of 817 ends

No
No School Trip
Commute
Commute

0.00 0.00
Implement School Bus Program
Commute Subtotal
Provide Ride Sharing Program
Total VMT Reduction 0.00
Area Mitigation
Measure Implemented
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Mitigation Measure
No Hearth
% Electric Chainsaw
% Electric Leafblower
% Electric Lawnmower
Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Exterior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Interior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Exterior)
Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Interior)
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
Only Natural Gas Hearth
Input Value
150.00
100.00
150.00
100.00
Energy Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented
No
Mitigation Measure
Exceed Title 24
Input Value 1 Input Value 2
No Use Low VOC Paint (Parking) 150.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 444 of 817 ends

Solid Waste Mitigation
No
No Install High Efficiency Lighting
On-site Renewable
Appliance Type Land Use Subtype % Improvement
ClothWasher 30.00
DishWasher 15.00
Fan 50.00
Refrigerator 15.00
Water Mitigation Measures
Measure Implemented
No
No
Yes
Mitigation Measure
Use Reclaimed Water
Use Grey Water
Apply Water Conservation on Strategy
Input Value 1

0.00 0.00

0.00 20.00

0.00 Input Value 2
No
No
No
No
Install low-flow bathroom faucet
Install low-flow Toilet
Install low-flow Shower
Install low-flow Kitchen faucet

32.00 18.00

20.00 20.00
No
No
No
Turf Reduction
Water Efficient Landscape
Use Water Efficient Irrigation Systems

0.00 6.10

0.00 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 445 of 817 ends

Mitigation Measures
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Percent Reduction in Waste Disposed
Input Value
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 11 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard

Page 446 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage updated to represent total acreage of project site.

Construction Phase - Architectural coating assumed to start two weeks after building construction initiation and lasts for the same duration.

Demolition - Building square footage is equal to the existing building on-site.

Vehicle Trips - Updated to be consistent with the project-specific traffic report.

Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 46.00 Space 0.41 18,400.00 0
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 5.03 1000sqft 1.41 5,028.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 200.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,030.00 5,028.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 1.41
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 447 of 817 ends

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 21.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 50.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 29.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 616.12 181.11
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 472.58 181.11
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 470.95 181.11
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 448 of 817 ends

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024 0.1321 0.9278 1.0475 1.9200e0030.0328 0.0388 0.0716 0.0128 0.0372 0.0500 0.0000 161.8868 161.8868 0.0274 9.6000e004162.8573 2025 0.0791 0.4993 0.6197 1.1300e0035.1600e0030.0190 0.0241 1.4000e0030.0184 0.0198 0.0000 94.5228 94.5228 0.0133 5.5000e00495.0181 Maximum 0.1321 0.9278 1.0475 1.9200e0030.0328 0.0388 0.0716 0.0128 0.0372 0.0500 0.0000 161.8868 161.8868 0.0274 9.6000e004162.8573 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2024 0.1321 0.9278 1.0475 1.9200e0030.0328 0.0388 0.0716 0.0128 0.0372 0.0500 0.0000 161.8866 161.8866 0.0274 9.6000e004162.8572 2025 0.0791 0.4993 0.6197 1.1300e0035.1600e0030.0190 0.0241 1.4000e0030.0184 0.0198 0.0000 94.5227 94.5227 0.0133 5.5000e00495.0180 Maximum 0.1321 0.9278 1.0475 1.9200e0030.0328 0.0388 0.0716 0.0128 0.0372 0.0500 0.0000 161.8866 161.8866 0.0274 9.6000e004162.8572 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 449 of 817 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 6-3-2024 9-2-2024 0.4365 0.4365
2 9-3-2024 12-2-2024 0.4685 0.4685
3 12-3-2024 3-2-2025 0.4454 0.4454
4 3-3-2025 6-2-2025 0.2846 0.2846
Highest 0.4685 0.4685

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0239 0.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004 Energy 5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 71.1749 71.1749 3.5800e0031.3200e00371.6593 Mobile 0.3895 0.4511 3.7695 8.0800e0030.8982 5.9200e0030.9041 0.2400 5.5100e0030.2455 0.0000 764.2708 764.2708 0.0472 0.0354 775.9924 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11.7613 0.0000 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4844 0.7959 1.2803 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8820 Total 0.4190 0.5022 3.8128 8.3900e0030.8982 9.8000e0030.9080 0.2400 9.3900e0030.2494 12.2457 836.2426 848.4883 0.7957 0.0379 879.6728 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 450 of 817 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.0239 0.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004 Energy 5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 71.1749 71.1749 3.5800e0031.3200e00371.6593 Mobile 0.3895 0.4511 3.7695 8.0800e0030.8982 5.9200e0030.9041 0.2400 5.5100e0030.2455 0.0000 764.2708 764.2708 0.0472 0.0354 775.9924 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 11.7613 0.0000 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4844 0.7896 1.2740 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8756 Total 0.4190 0.5022 3.8128 8.3900e0030.8982 9.8000e0030.9080 0.2400 9.3900e0030.2494 12.2457 836.2363 848.4819 0.7957 0.0379 879.6664 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/3/2024 6/28/2024 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/29/2024 7/2/2024 5 2 3 Grading Grading 7/3/2024 7/8/2024 5 4
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 451 of 817 ends

4 Paving Paving 7/9/2024 7/22/2024 5 10
5 Building Construction Building Construction 7/23/2024 4/28/2025 5 200 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/6/2024 5/12/2025 5 200 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,542; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,514; Striped Parking Area: 1,104 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0.41
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 452 of 817 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 3.4000e0030.0000 3.4000e0035.1000e0040.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0144 0.1389 0.1349 2.4000e0046.3100e0036.3100e0035.8900e0035.8900e0030.0000 21.0916 21.0916 5.3400e0030.0000 21.2250 Total 0.0144 0.1389 0.1349 2.4000e0043.4000e0036.3100e0039.7100e0035.1000e0045.8900e0036.4000e0030.0000 21.0916 21.0916 5.3400e0030.0000 21.2250 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 31.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 10.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 453 of 817 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e0052.1000e0035.0000e0041.0000e0052.6000e0042.0000e0052.8000e0047.0000e0052.0000e0059.0000e0050.0000 0.9106 0.9106 3.0000e0051.4000e0040.9544 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1000e0042.0000e0042.6900e0031.0000e0051.0300e0031.0000e0051.0300e0032.7000e0040.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.7852 0.7852 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7919 Total 3.4000e0042.3000e0033.1900e0032.0000e0051.2900e0033.0000e0051.3100e0033.4000e0042.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.6959 1.6959 5.0000e0051.6000e0041.7463 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 3.4000e0030.0000 3.4000e0035.1000e0040.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0144 0.1389 0.1349 2.4000e0046.3100e0036.3100e0035.8900e0035.8900e0030.0000 21.0915 21.0915 5.3400e0030.0000 21.2250 Total 0.0144 0.1389 0.1349 2.4000e0043.4000e0036.3100e0039.7100e0035.1000e0045.8900e0036.4000e0030.0000 21.0915 21.0915 5.3400e0030.0000 21.2250 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 454 of 817 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 3.0000e0052.1000e0035.0000e0041.0000e0052.6000e0042.0000e0052.8000e0047.0000e0052.0000e0059.0000e0050.0000 0.9106 0.9106 3.0000e0051.4000e0040.9544 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.1000e0042.0000e0042.6900e0031.0000e0051.0300e0031.0000e0051.0300e0032.7000e0040.0000 2.8000e0040.0000 0.7852 0.7852 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.7919 Total 3.4000e0042.3000e0033.1900e0032.0000e0051.2900e0033.0000e0051.3100e0033.4000e0042.0000e0053.7000e0040.0000 1.6959 1.6959 5.0000e0051.6000e0041.7463 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.2700e0030.0000 6.2700e0033.0000e0030.0000 3.0000e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1100e0030.0118 6.6300e0032.0000e0054.8000e0044.8000e0044.4000e0044.4000e0040.0000 1.5113 1.5113 4.9000e0040.0000 1.5235 Total 1.1100e0030.0118 6.6300e0032.0000e0056.2700e0034.8000e0046.7500e0033.0000e0034.4000e0043.4400e0030.0000 1.5113 1.5113 4.9000e0040.0000 1.5235 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 455 of 817 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.7000e0040.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0050.0000 0.0483 0.0483 0.0000 0.0000 0.0487 Total 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.7000e0040.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0050.0000 0.0483 0.0483 0.0000 0.0000 0.0487 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 6.2700e0030.0000 6.2700e0033.0000e0030.0000 3.0000e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1100e0030.0118 6.6300e0032.0000e0054.8000e0044.8000e0044.4000e0044.4000e0040.0000 1.5113 1.5113 4.9000e0040.0000 1.5235 Total 1.1100e0030.0118 6.6300e0032.0000e0056.2700e0034.8000e0046.7500e0033.0000e0034.4000e0043.4400e0030.0000 1.5113 1.5113 4.9000e0040.0000 1.5235 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 456 of 817 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.7000e0040.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0050.0000 0.0483 0.0483 0.0000 0.0000 0.0487 Total 2.0000e0051.0000e0051.7000e0040.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0052.0000e0050.0000 2.0000e0050.0000 0.0483 0.0483 0.0000 0.0000 0.0487 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0142 0.0000 0.0142 6.8500e0030.0000 6.8500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6000e0030.0276 0.0174 4.0000e0051.1400e0031.1400e0031.0500e0031.0500e0030.0000 3.6207 3.6207 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6500 Total 2.6000e0030.0276 0.0174 4.0000e0050.0142 1.1400e0030.0153 6.8500e0031.0500e0037.9000e0030.0000 3.6207 3.6207 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6500 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 457 of 817 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e0053.0000e0054.1000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1208 0.1208 0.0000 0.0000 0.1218 Total 5.0000e0053.0000e0054.1000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1208 0.1208 0.0000 0.0000 0.1218 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0142 0.0000 0.0142 6.8500e0030.0000 6.8500e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6000e0030.0276 0.0174 4.0000e0051.1400e0031.1400e0031.0500e0031.0500e0030.0000 3.6207 3.6207 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6500 Total 2.6000e0030.0276 0.0174 4.0000e0050.0142 1.1400e0030.0153 6.8500e0031.0500e0037.9000e0030.0000 3.6207 3.6207 1.1700e0030.0000 3.6500 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 458 of 817 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0000e0053.0000e0054.1000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1208 0.1208 0.0000 0.0000 0.1218 Total 5.0000e0053.0000e0054.1000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1208 0.1208 0.0000 0.0000 0.1218 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.0900e0030.0293 0.0441 7.0000e0051.4100e0031.4100e0031.3000e0031.3000e0030.0000 5.8870 5.8870 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9337 Paving 5.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.6300e0030.0293 0.0441 7.0000e0051.4100e0031.4100e0031.3000e0031.3000e0030.0000 5.8870 5.8870 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9337 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 459 of 817 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e0041.0000e0041.3500e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.3926 0.3926 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3960 Total 1.6000e0041.0000e0041.3500e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.3926 0.3926 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3960 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 3.0900e0030.0293 0.0441 7.0000e0051.4100e0031.4100e0031.3000e0031.3000e0030.0000 5.8870 5.8870 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9337 Paving 5.4000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.6300e0030.0293 0.0441 7.0000e0051.4100e0031.4100e0031.3000e0031.3000e0030.0000 5.8870 5.8870 1.8700e0030.0000 5.9337 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 460 of 817 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e0041.0000e0041.3500e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.3926 0.3926 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3960 Total 1.6000e0041.0000e0041.3500e0030.0000 5.1000e0040.0000 5.2000e0041.4000e0040.0000 1.4000e0040.0000 0.3926 0.3926 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.3960 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0824 0.6417 0.7260 1.2800e0030.0261 0.0261 0.0252 0.0252 0.0000 105.3345 105.3345 0.0175 0.0000 105.7731 Total 0.0824 0.6417 0.7260 1.2800e0030.0261 0.0261 0.0252 0.0252 0.0000 105.3345 105.3345 0.0175 0.0000 105.7731 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 461 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.4000e0040.0103 3.1600e0035.0000e0051.5200e0036.0000e0051.5800e0034.4000e0046.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 4.5082 4.5082 9.0000e0056.7000e0044.7092 Worker 1.3900e0039.1000e0040.0120 4.0000e0054.5800e0032.0000e0054.6100e0031.2200e0032.0000e0051.2400e0030.0000 3.5033 3.5033 9.0000e0059.0000e0053.5331 Total 1.6300e0030.0112 0.0152 9.0000e0056.1000e0038.0000e0056.1900e0031.6600e0038.0000e0051.7400e0030.0000 8.0116 8.0116 1.8000e0047.6000e0048.2423 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0824 0.6417 0.7260 1.2800e0030.0261 0.0261 0.0252 0.0252 0.0000 105.3344 105.3344 0.0175 0.0000 105.7730 Total 0.0824 0.6417 0.7260 1.2800e0030.0261 0.0261 0.0252 0.0252 0.0000 105.3344 105.3344 0.0175 0.0000 105.7730 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 462 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.4000e0040.0103 3.1600e0035.0000e0051.5200e0036.0000e0051.5800e0034.4000e0046.0000e0055.0000e0040.0000 4.5082 4.5082 9.0000e0056.7000e0044.7092 Worker 1.3900e0039.1000e0040.0120 4.0000e0054.5800e0032.0000e0054.6100e0031.2200e0032.0000e0051.2400e0030.0000 3.5033 3.5033 9.0000e0059.0000e0053.5331 Total 1.6300e0030.0112 0.0152 9.0000e0056.1000e0038.0000e0056.1900e0031.6600e0038.0000e0051.7400e0030.0000 8.0116 8.0116 1.8000e0047.6000e0048.2423 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0556 0.4373 0.5225 9.3000e0040.0165 0.0165 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 76.2855 76.2855 0.0125 0.0000 76.5969 Total 0.0556 0.4373 0.5225 9.3000e0040.0165 0.0165 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 76.2855 76.2855 0.0125 0.0000 76.5969 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 463 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.7000e0047.4400e0032.2500e0033.0000e0051.1000e0034.0000e0051.1500e0033.2000e0044.0000e0053.6000e0040.0000 3.2065 3.2065 7.0000e0054.7000e0043.3495 Worker 9.5000e0045.9000e0048.1700e0033.0000e0053.3200e0032.0000e0053.3300e0038.8000e0041.0000e0059.0000e0040.0000 2.4763 2.4763 6.0000e0056.0000e0052.4964 Total 1.1200e0038.0300e0030.0104 6.0000e0054.4200e0036.0000e0054.4800e0031.2000e0035.0000e0051.2600e0030.0000 5.6828 5.6828 1.3000e0045.3000e0045.8459 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0556 0.4373 0.5225 9.3000e0040.0165 0.0165 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 76.2854 76.2854 0.0125 0.0000 76.5968 Total 0.0556 0.4373 0.5225 9.3000e0040.0165 0.0165 0.0159 0.0159 0.0000 76.2854 76.2854 0.0125 0.0000 76.5968 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 464 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.7000e0047.4400e0032.2500e0033.0000e0051.1000e0034.0000e0051.1500e0033.2000e0044.0000e0053.6000e0040.0000 3.2065 3.2065 7.0000e0054.7000e0043.3495 Worker 9.5000e0045.9000e0048.1700e0033.0000e0053.3200e0032.0000e0053.3300e0038.8000e0041.0000e0059.0000e0040.0000 2.4763 2.4763 6.0000e0056.0000e0052.4964 Total 1.1200e0038.0300e0030.0104 6.0000e0054.4200e0036.0000e0054.4800e0031.2000e0035.0000e0051.2600e0030.0000 5.6828 5.6828 1.3000e0045.3000e0045.8459 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0159 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.5800e0030.0646 0.0959 1.6000e0043.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0030.0000 13.5322 13.5322 7.6000e0040.0000 13.5513 Total 0.0255 0.0646 0.0959 1.6000e0043.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0030.0000 13.5322 13.5322 7.6000e0040.0000 13.5513 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 465 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.5000e0041.7000e0042.2000e0031.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 8.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 2.3000e0040.0000 0.6403 0.6403 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6457 Total 2.5000e0041.7000e0042.2000e0031.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 8.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 2.3000e0040.0000 0.6403 0.6403 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6457 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0159 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 9.5800e0030.0646 0.0959 1.6000e0043.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0030.0000 13.5322 13.5322 7.6000e0040.0000 13.5513 Total 0.0255 0.0646 0.0959 1.6000e0043.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0033.2300e0030.0000 13.5322 13.5322 7.6000e0040.0000 13.5513 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 466 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.5000e0041.7000e0042.2000e0031.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 8.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 2.3000e0040.0000 0.6403 0.6403 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6457 Total 2.5000e0041.7000e0042.2000e0031.0000e0058.4000e0040.0000 8.4000e0042.2000e0040.0000 2.3000e0040.0000 0.6403 0.6403 2.0000e0052.0000e0050.6457 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.0300e0030.0538 0.0850 1.4000e0042.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0030.0000 12.0003 12.0003 6.5000e0040.0000 12.0167 Total 0.0222 0.0538 0.0850 1.4000e0042.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0030.0000 12.0003 12.0003 6.5000e0040.0000 12.0167 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 467 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e0041.3000e0041.8300e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5542 0.5542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.5587 Total 2.1000e0041.3000e0041.8300e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5542 0.5542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.5587 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.0141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.0300e0030.0538 0.0850 1.4000e0042.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0030.0000 12.0003 12.0003 6.5000e0040.0000 12.0166 Total 0.0222 0.0538 0.0850 1.4000e0042.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0032.4200e0030.0000 12.0003 12.0003 6.5000e0040.0000 12.0166 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 468 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e0041.3000e0041.8300e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5542 0.5542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.5587 Total 2.1000e0041.3000e0041.8300e0031.0000e0057.4000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5542 0.5542 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.5587 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 469 of 817 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.3895 0.4511 3.7695 8.0800e0030.8982 5.9200e0030.9041 0.2400 5.5100e0030.2455 0.0000 764.2708 764.2708 0.0472 0.0354 775.9924 Unmitigated 0.3895 0.4511 3.7695 8.0800e0030.8982 5.9200e0030.9041 0.2400 5.5100e0030.2455 0.0000 764.2708 764.2708 0.0472 0.0354 775.9924

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 910.98 910.98 910.98 2,436,714 2,436,714 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 910.98 910.98 910.98 2,436,714 2,436,714
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 100 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820 Parking Lot 0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 470 of 817 ends

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15.5616 15.5616 2.5200e0033.1000e00415.7155 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 15.5616 15.5616 2.5200e0033.1000e00415.7155 NaturalGas
Mitigated

5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 55.6133 55.6133 1.0700e0031.0200e00355.9438 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 55.6133 55.6133 1.0700e0031.0200e00355.9438

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 471 of 817 ends

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

1.04215e
+006

5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 55.6133 55.6133 1.0700e0031.0200e00355.9438 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 55.6133 55.6133 1.0700e0031.0200e00355.9438 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

1.04215e
+006

5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 55.6133 55.6133 1.0700e0031.0200e00355.9438 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6200e0030.0511 0.0429 3.1000e0043.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0033.8800e0030.0000 55.6133 55.6133 1.0700e0031.0200e00355.9438 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 472 of 817 ends

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
161751 14.9658 2.4200e0032.9000e00415.1138
Parking Lot 6440 0.5959 1.0000e0041.0000e0050.6018
Total 15.5616 2.5200e0033.0000e00415.7155
Unmitigated
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
161751 14.9658 2.4200e0032.9000e00415.1138
Parking Lot 6440 0.5959 1.0000e0041.0000e0050.6018
Total 15.5616 2.5200e0033.0000e00415.7155
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 473 of 817 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.0239 0.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004 Unmitigated 0.0239 0.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

3.0100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0208 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e0050.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004 Total 0.0239 0.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 474 of 817 ends

Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

3.0100e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.0208 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.0000e0050.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004 Total 0.0239 0.0000 4.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.1000e0049.1000e0040.0000 0.0000 9.7000e004 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 475 of 817 ends

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 1.2740 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8756
Unmitigated 1.2803 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8820

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

1.52677 /

0.0974537

1.2803 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8820
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.2803 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8820
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 476 of 817 ends

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

1.52677 /

0.077963

1.2740 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8756
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 1.2740 0.0499 1.1900e0032.8756
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381
Unmitigated 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 477 of 817 ends

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

57.94 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381
Unmitigated
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

57.94 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total 11.7613 0.6951 0.0000 29.1381
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 478 of 817 ends

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 33 Date: 6/5/2023 9:22 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 479 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage updated to represent total acreage of project site.

Construction Phase - Architectural coating assumed to start two weeks after building construction initiation and lasts for the same duration.

Demolition - Building square footage is equal to the existing building on-site.

Vehicle Trips - Updated to be consistent with the project-specific traffic report.

Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 46.00 Space 0.41 18,400.00 0
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 5.03 1000sqft 1.41 5,028.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 200.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,030.00 5,028.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 1.41
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 480 of 817 ends

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 21.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 50.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 29.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 616.12 181.11
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 472.58 181.11
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 470.95 181.11
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 481 of 817 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.9359 14.1074 14.6483 0.0267 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,517.685 1 2,517.685
1 0.6471 0.0180 2,537.896
8 2025 1.8287 11.7443 14.5517 0.0266 0.1257 0.4455 0.5712 0.0340 0.4314 0.4654 0.0000 2,450.947 0 2,450.947
0 0.3458 0.0142 2,463.835
9 Maximum 1.9359 14.1074 14.6483 0.0267 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,517.685 1 2,517.685
1 0.6471 0.0180 2,537.896
8 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.9359 14.1074 14.6483 0.0267 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,517.685 1 2,517.685
1 0.6471 0.0180 2,537.896
8 2025 1.8287 11.7443 14.5517 0.0266 0.1257 0.4455 0.5712 0.0340 0.4314 0.4654 0.0000 2,450.947 0 2,450.947
0 0.3458 0.0142 2,463.835
9 Maximum 1.9359 14.1074 14.6483 0.0267 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,517.685 1 2,517.685
1 0.6471 0.0180 2,537.896
8 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 482 of 817 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 483 of 817 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Energy 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Mobile 2.3673 2.2815 20.7417 0.0468 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,879.481 8 4,879.481
8 0.2687 0.2037 4,946.890
4 Total 2.5292 2.5615 20.9820 0.0485 5.1290 0.0538 5.1828 1.3661 0.0516 1.4177 5,215.400 7 5,215.400
7 0.2752 0.2098 5,284.806
1 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Energy 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Mobile 2.3673 2.2815 20.7417 0.0468 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,879.481 8 4,879.481
8 0.2687 0.2037 4,946.890
4 Total 2.5292 2.5615 20.9820 0.0485 5.1290 0.0538 5.1828 1.3661 0.0516 1.4177 5,215.400 7 5,215.400
7 0.2752 0.2098 5,284.806
1 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 484 of 817 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/3/2024 6/28/2024 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/29/2024 7/2/2024 5 2 3 Grading Grading 7/3/2024 7/8/2024 5 4
4 Paving Paving 7/9/2024 7/22/2024 5 10
5 Building Construction Building Construction 7/23/2024 4/28/2025 5 200 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/6/2024 5/12/2025 5 200 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,542; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,514; Striped Parking Area: 1,104 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0.41
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 485 of 817 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 31.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 10.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 486 of 817 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.3396 0.0000 0.3396 0.0514 0.0000 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.6311 0.6311 0.5895 0.5895 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Total 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.3396 0.6311 0.9707 0.0514 0.5895 0.6409 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.3100e0030.2027 0.0495 9.2000e0040.0271 1.7100e0030.0288 7.4300e0031.6400e0039.0700e003100.3403 100.3403 3.3600e0030.0159 105.1632 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0329 0.0180 0.2896 9.0000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 92.3990 92.3990 2.1600e0032.1000e00393.0774 Total 0.0362 0.2207 0.3391 1.8200e0030.1339 2.2100e0030.1361 0.0358 2.1000e0030.0379 192.7393 192.7393 5.5200e0030.0180 198.2406 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 487 of 817 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.3396 0.0000 0.3396 0.0514 0.0000 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.6311 0.6311 0.5895 0.5895 0.0000 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Total 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.3396 0.6311 0.9707 0.0514 0.5895 0.6409 0.0000 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.3100e0030.2027 0.0495 9.2000e0040.0271 1.7100e0030.0288 7.4300e0031.6400e0039.0700e003100.3403 100.3403 3.3600e0030.0159 105.1632 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0329 0.0180 0.2896 9.0000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 92.3990 92.3990 2.1600e0032.1000e00393.0774 Total 0.0362 0.2207 0.3391 1.8200e0030.1339 2.2100e0030.1361 0.0358 2.1000e0030.0379 192.7393 192.7393 5.5200e0030.0180 198.2406 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 488 of 817 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2662 0.0000 6.2662 3.0041 0.0000 3.0041 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 0.4823 0.4823 0.4437 0.4437 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Total 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 6.2662 0.4823 6.7485 3.0041 0.4437 3.4478 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0202 0.0111 0.1782 5.5000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 56.8609 56.8609 1.3300e0031.2900e00357.2784 Total 0.0202 0.0111 0.1782 5.5000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 56.8609 56.8609 1.3300e0031.2900e00357.2784 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 489 of 817 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2662 0.0000 6.2662 3.0041 0.0000 3.0041 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 0.4823 0.4823 0.4437 0.4437 0.0000 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Total 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 6.2662 0.4823 6.7485 3.0041 0.4437 3.4478 0.0000 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0202 0.0111 0.1782 5.5000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 56.8609 56.8609 1.3300e0031.2900e00357.2784 Total 0.0202 0.0111 0.1782 5.5000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 56.8609 56.8609 1.3300e0031.2900e00357.2784 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 490 of 817 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 7.0826 0.5722 7.6548 3.4247 0.5265 3.9512 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0253 0.0139 0.2228 6.9000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 71.0761 71.0761 1.6600e0031.6100e00371.5980 Total 0.0253 0.0139 0.2228 6.9000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 71.0761 71.0761 1.6600e0031.6100e00371.5980 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 491 of 817 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 7.0826 0.5722 7.6548 3.4247 0.5265 3.9512 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0253 0.0139 0.2228 6.9000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 71.0761 71.0761 1.6600e0031.6100e00371.5980 Total 0.0253 0.0139 0.2228 6.9000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 71.0761 71.0761 1.6600e0031.6100e00371.5980 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 492 of 817 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6180 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7254 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0329 0.0180 0.2896 9.0000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 92.3990 92.3990 2.1600e0032.1000e00393.0774 Total 0.0329 0.0180 0.2896 9.0000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 92.3990 92.3990 2.1600e0032.1000e00393.0774 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 493 of 817 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6180 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 0.0000 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7254 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 0.0000 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0329 0.0180 0.2896 9.0000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 92.3990 92.3990 2.1600e0032.1000e00393.0774 Total 0.0329 0.0180 0.2896 9.0000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 92.3990 92.3990 2.1600e0032.1000e00393.0774 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 494 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2300e0030.1716 0.0536 8.0000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0000e0038.8000e00385.6278 85.6278 1.7700e0030.0127 89.4438 Worker 0.0253 0.0139 0.2228 6.9000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 71.0761 71.0761 1.6600e0031.6100e00371.5980 Total 0.0295 0.1855 0.2764 1.4900e0030.1092 1.4400e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3600e0030.0310 156.7039 156.7039 3.4300e0030.0143 161.0418 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 495 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2300e0030.1716 0.0536 8.0000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0000e0038.8000e00385.6278 85.6278 1.7700e0030.0127 89.4438 Worker 0.0253 0.0139 0.2228 6.9000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 71.0761 71.0761 1.6600e0031.6100e00371.5980 Total 0.0295 0.1855 0.2764 1.4900e0030.1092 1.4400e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3600e0030.0310 156.7039 156.7039 3.4300e0030.0143 161.0418 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 496 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.1300e0030.1710 0.0527 7.8000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0000e0038.8000e00384.1039 84.1039 1.7600e0030.0124 87.8510 Worker 0.0237 0.0125 0.2088 6.7000e0040.0822 3.7000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 69.3688 69.3688 1.5100e0031.5100e00369.8569 Total 0.0279 0.1835 0.2615 1.4500e0030.1092 1.4200e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3400e0030.0309 153.4727 153.4727 3.2700e0030.0139 157.7079 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 497 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.1300e0030.1710 0.0527 7.8000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0000e0038.8000e00384.1039 84.1039 1.7600e0030.0124 87.8510 Worker 0.0237 0.0125 0.2088 6.7000e0040.0822 3.7000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 69.3688 69.3688 1.5100e0031.5100e00369.8569 Total 0.0279 0.1835 0.2615 1.4500e0030.1092 1.4200e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3400e0030.0309 153.4727 153.4727 3.2700e0030.0139 157.7079 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 498 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 0.4813 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0500e0032.7700e0030.0446 1.4000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00314.2152 14.2152 3.3000e0043.2000e00414.3196 Total 5.0500e0032.7700e0030.0446 1.4000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00314.2152 14.2152 3.3000e0043.2000e00414.3196 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 499 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 0.4813 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.0500e0032.7700e0030.0446 1.4000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00314.2152 14.2152 3.3000e0043.2000e00414.3196 Total 5.0500e0032.7700e0030.0446 1.4000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00314.2152 14.2152 3.3000e0043.2000e00414.3196 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 500 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 0.4714 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7500e0032.5000e0030.0418 1.3000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.8738 13.8738 3.0000e0043.0000e00413.9714 Total 4.7500e0032.5000e0030.0418 1.3000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.8738 13.8738 3.0000e0043.0000e00413.9714 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 501 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 0.4714 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7500e0032.5000e0030.0418 1.3000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.8738 13.8738 3.0000e0043.0000e00413.9714 Total 4.7500e0032.5000e0030.0418 1.3000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.8738 13.8738 3.0000e0043.0000e00413.9714 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 502 of 817 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.3673 2.2815 20.7417 0.0468 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,879.481 8 4,879.481
8 0.2687 0.2037 4,946.890
4 Unmitigated 2.3673 2.2815 20.7417 0.0468 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,879.481 8 4,879.481
8 0.2687 0.2037 4,946.890
4 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 910.98 910.98 910.98 2,436,714 2,436,714 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 910.98 910.98 910.98 2,436,714 2,436,714
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 100 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 503 of 817 ends

Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820 Parking Lot 0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 504 of 817 ends

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
2855.22 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

2.85522 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 505 of 817 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Unmitigated 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0165 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.8000e0045.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Total 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 506 of 817 ends

Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0165 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.8000e0045.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Total 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 507 of 817 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:24 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 508 of 817 ends

Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard
Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Lot acreage updated to represent total acreage of project site.

Construction Phase - Architectural coating assumed to start two weeks after building construction initiation and lasts for the same duration.

Demolition - Building square footage is equal to the existing building on-site.

Vehicle Trips - Updated to be consistent with the project-specific traffic report.

Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 46.00 Space 0.41 18,400.00 0
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 5.03 1000sqft 1.41 5,028.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
4 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 64

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 200.00
tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,030.00 5,028.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 1.41
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 509 of 817 ends

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 21.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 50.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 29.00 100.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 616.12 181.11
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 472.58 181.11
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 470.95 181.11
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 510 of 817 ends

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.9366 14.1233 14.6398 0.0266 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,511.245 4 2,511.245
4 0.6473 0.0183 2,531.563
1 2025 1.8294 11.7577 14.5445 0.0266 0.1257 0.4455 0.5712 0.0340 0.4315 0.4654 0.0000 2,445.195 4 2,445.195
4 0.3461 0.0146 2,458.180
7 Maximum 1.9366 14.1233 14.6398 0.0266 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,511.245 4 2,511.245
4 0.6473 0.0183 2,531.563
1 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2024 1.9366 14.1233 14.6398 0.0266 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,511.245 4 2,511.245
4 0.6473 0.0183 2,531.563
1 2025 1.8294 11.7577 14.5445 0.0266 0.1257 0.4455 0.5712 0.0340 0.4315 0.4654 0.0000 2,445.195 4 2,445.195
4 0.3461 0.0146 2,458.180
7 Maximum 1.9366 14.1233 14.6398 0.0266 7.1647 0.6333 7.7374 3.4465 0.5916 3.9734 0.0000 2,511.245 4 2,511.245
4 0.6473 0.0183 2,531.563
1 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 511 of 817 ends

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 512 of 817 ends

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Energy 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Mobile 2.1458 2.6201 22.0407 0.0442 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,606.920 9 4,606.920
9 0.3015 0.2226 4,680.798
2 Total 2.3077 2.9001 22.2811 0.0459 5.1290 0.0539 5.1828 1.3661 0.0516 1.4177 4,942.839 7 4,942.839
7 0.3080 0.2288 5,018.713
9 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Energy 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Mobile 2.1458 2.6201 22.0407 0.0442 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,606.920 9 4,606.920
9 0.3015 0.2226 4,680.798
2 Total 2.3077 2.9001 22.2811 0.0459 5.1290 0.0539 5.1828 1.3661 0.0516 1.4177 4,942.839 7 4,942.839
7 0.3080 0.2288 5,018.713
9 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 513 of 817 ends

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 6/3/2024 6/28/2024 5 20
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 6/29/2024 7/2/2024 5 2 3 Grading Grading 7/3/2024 7/8/2024 5 4
4 Paving Paving 7/9/2024 7/22/2024 5 10
5 Building Construction Building Construction 7/23/2024 4/28/2025 5 200 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/6/2024 5/12/2025 5 200 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 7,542; Non-Residential Outdoor: 2,514; Striped Parking Area: 1,104 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1.88
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4
Acres of Paving: 0.41
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 514 of 817 ends

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56
Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 31.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 10.00 4.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 515 of 817 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.3396 0.0000 0.3396 0.0514 0.0000 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.6311 0.6311 0.5895 0.5895 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Total 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.3396 0.6311 0.9707 0.0514 0.5895 0.6409 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.1000e0030.2144 0.0501 9.2000e0040.0271 1.7200e0030.0288 7.4300e0031.6400e0039.0700e003100.4362 100.4362 3.3500e0030.0159 105.2636 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0338 0.0223 0.2784 8.3000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 85.8634 85.8634 2.4600e0032.4100e00386.6434 Total 0.0369 0.2366 0.3285 1.7500e0030.1339 2.2200e0030.1361 0.0358 2.1000e0030.0379 186.2995 186.2995 5.8100e0030.0183 191.9069 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 516 of 817 ends

3.2 Demolition - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 0.3396 0.0000 0.3396 0.0514 0.0000 0.0514 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.6311 0.6311 0.5895 0.5895 0.0000 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Total 1.4397 13.8867 13.4879 0.0241 0.3396 0.6311 0.9707 0.0514 0.5895 0.6409 0.0000 2,324.945 9 2,324.945
9 0.5884 2,339.656
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 3.1000e0030.2144 0.0501 9.2000e0040.0271 1.7200e0030.0288 7.4300e0031.6400e0039.0700e003100.4362 100.4362 3.3500e0030.0159 105.2636 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0338 0.0223 0.2784 8.3000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 85.8634 85.8634 2.4600e0032.4100e00386.6434 Total 0.0369 0.2366 0.3285 1.7500e0030.1339 2.2200e0030.1361 0.0358 2.1000e0030.0379 186.2995 186.2995 5.8100e0030.0183 191.9069 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 517 of 817 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2662 0.0000 6.2662 3.0041 0.0000 3.0041 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 0.4823 0.4823 0.4437 0.4437 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Total 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 6.2662 0.4823 6.7485 3.0041 0.4437 3.4478 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0208 0.0137 0.1713 5.1000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 52.8390 52.8390 1.5200e0031.4800e00353.3190 Total 0.0208 0.0137 0.1713 5.1000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 52.8390 52.8390 1.5200e0031.4800e00353.3190 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 518 of 817 ends

3.3 Site Preparation - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2662 0.0000 6.2662 3.0041 0.0000 3.0041 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 0.4823 0.4823 0.4437 0.4437 0.0000 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Total 1.1067 11.8407 6.6317 0.0172 6.2662 0.4823 6.7485 3.0041 0.4437 3.4478 0.0000 1,665.882 6 1,665.882
6 0.5388 1,679.352
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0208 0.0137 0.1713 5.1000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 52.8390 52.8390 1.5200e0031.4800e00353.3190 Total 0.0208 0.0137 0.1713 5.1000e0040.0657 3.1000e0040.0660 0.0174 2.9000e0040.0177 52.8390 52.8390 1.5200e0031.4800e00353.3190 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 519 of 817 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 7.0826 0.5722 7.6548 3.4247 0.5265 3.9512 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0260 0.0171 0.2141 6.4000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 66.0487 66.0487 1.9000e0031.8500e00366.6488 Total 0.0260 0.0171 0.2141 6.4000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 66.0487 66.0487 1.9000e0031.8500e00366.6488 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 520 of 817 ends

3.4 Grading - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 0.5722 0.5722 0.5265 0.5265 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Total 1.3015 13.8178 8.6998 0.0206 7.0826 0.5722 7.6548 3.4247 0.5265 3.9512 0.0000 1,995.580 3 1,995.580
3 0.6454 2,011.715
5 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0260 0.0171 0.2141 6.4000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 66.0487 66.0487 1.9000e0031.8500e00366.6488 Total 0.0260 0.0171 0.2141 6.4000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 66.0487 66.0487 1.9000e0031.8500e00366.6488 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 521 of 817 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6180 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7254 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0338 0.0223 0.2784 8.3000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 85.8634 85.8634 2.4600e0032.4100e00386.6434 Total 0.0338 0.0223 0.2784 8.3000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 85.8634 85.8634 2.4600e0032.4100e00386.6434 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 522 of 817 ends

3.5 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.6180 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 0.0000 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Paving 0.1074 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.7254 5.8607 8.8253 0.0136 0.2810 0.2810 0.2594 0.2594 0.0000 1,297.868 8 1,297.868
8 0.4114 1,308.154
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0338 0.0223 0.2784 8.3000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 85.8634 85.8634 2.4600e0032.4100e00386.6434 Total 0.0338 0.0223 0.2784 8.3000e0040.1068 5.0000e0040.1073 0.0283 4.6000e0040.0288 85.8634 85.8634 2.4600e0032.4100e00386.6434 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 523 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0800e0030.1816 0.0555 8.0000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0100e0038.8100e00385.7531 85.7531 1.7600e0030.0127 89.5783 Worker 0.0260 0.0171 0.2141 6.4000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 66.0487 66.0487 1.9000e0031.8500e00366.6488 Total 0.0301 0.1987 0.2696 1.4400e0030.1092 1.4400e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3700e0030.0310 151.8018 151.8018 3.6600e0030.0145 156.2270 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 524 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Total 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 0.0000 2,001.921 4 2,001.921
4 0.3334 2,010.256
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.0800e0030.1816 0.0555 8.0000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0100e0038.8100e00385.7531 85.7531 1.7600e0030.0127 89.5783 Worker 0.0260 0.0171 0.2141 6.4000e0040.0822 3.9000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.6000e0040.0222 66.0487 66.0487 1.9000e0031.8500e00366.6488 Total 0.0301 0.1987 0.2696 1.4400e0030.1092 1.4400e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3700e0030.0310 151.8018 151.8018 3.6600e0030.0145 156.2270 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 525 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9700e0030.1810 0.0545 7.8000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0100e0038.8000e00384.2294 84.2294 1.7500e0030.0125 87.9854 Worker 0.0245 0.0154 0.2013 6.2000e0040.0822 3.7000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 64.4712 64.4712 1.7200e0031.7400e00365.0322 Total 0.0285 0.1964 0.2558 1.4000e0030.1092 1.4200e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3500e0030.0309 148.7006 148.7006 3.4700e0030.0142 153.0176 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 526 of 817 ends

3.6 Building Construction - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Total 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 0.0000 2,002.152 4 2,002.152
4 0.3269 2,010.324
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.9700e0030.1810 0.0545 7.8000e0040.0271 1.0500e0030.0281 7.8000e0031.0100e0038.8000e00384.2294 84.2294 1.7500e0030.0125 87.9854 Worker 0.0245 0.0154 0.2013 6.2000e0040.0822 3.7000e0040.0825 0.0218 3.4000e0040.0221 64.4712 64.4712 1.7200e0031.7400e00365.0322 Total 0.0285 0.1964 0.2558 1.4000e0030.1092 1.4200e0030.1107 0.0296 1.3500e0030.0309 148.7006 148.7006 3.4700e0030.0142 153.0176 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 527 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 0.4813 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e0033.4200e0030.0428 1.3000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.2098 13.2098 3.8000e0043.7000e00413.3298 Total 5.2000e0033.4200e0030.0428 1.3000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.2098 13.2098 3.8000e0043.7000e00413.3298 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 528 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 0.4813 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.2000e0033.4200e0030.0428 1.3000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.2098 13.2098 3.8000e0043.7000e00413.3298 Total 5.2000e0033.4200e0030.0428 1.3000e0040.0164 8.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00313.2098 13.2098 3.8000e0043.7000e00413.3298 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 529 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 0.4714 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.9000e0033.0800e0030.0403 1.2000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00312.8942 12.8942 3.4000e0043.5000e00413.0065 Total 4.9000e0033.0800e0030.0403 1.2000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00312.8942 12.8942 3.4000e0043.5000e00413.0065 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 530 of 817 ends

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 0.3006 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Total 0.4714 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.9000e0033.0800e0030.0403 1.2000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00312.8942 12.8942 3.4000e0043.5000e00413.0065 Total 4.9000e0033.0800e0030.0403 1.2000e0040.0164 7.0000e0050.0165 4.3600e0037.0000e0054.4300e00312.8942 12.8942 3.4000e0043.5000e00413.0065 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 531 of 817 ends

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 2.1458 2.6201 22.0407 0.0442 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,606.920 9 4,606.920
9 0.3015 0.2226 4,680.798
2 Unmitigated 2.1458 2.6201 22.0407 0.0442 5.1290 0.0326 5.1615 1.3661 0.0303 1.3964 4,606.920 9 4,606.920
9 0.3015 0.2226 4,680.798
2 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Fast Food Restaurant with Drive Thru 910.98 910.98 910.98 2,436,714 2,436,714 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 910.98 910.98 910.98 2,436,714 2,436,714
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

9.50 7.30 7.30 2.20 78.80 19.00 100 0 0
Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 532 of 817 ends

Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Fast Food Restaurant with Drive
Thru

0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820 Parking Lot 0.553839 0.058700 0.188468 0.120786 0.022796 0.005663 0.010629 0.007566 0.000983 0.000556 0.026354 0.000841 0.002820

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 533 of 817 ends

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru
2855.22 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Unmitigated
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Fast Food
Restaurant with
Drive Thru

2.85522 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0308 0.2799 0.2351 1.6800e0030.0213 0.0213 0.0213 0.0213 335.9077 335.9077 6.4400e0036.1600e003337.9038 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 534 of 817 ends

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Unmitigated 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0165 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.8000e0045.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Total 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 535 of 817 ends

Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.0165 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

0.1141 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 4.8000e0045.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Total 0.1311 5.0000e0055.2000e0030.0000 2.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0052.0000e0050.0112 0.0112 3.0000e0050.0119 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 536 of 817 ends

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 6/5/2023 9:25 AM Chick-fil-A @ Sutter Boulevard - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

Page 537 of 817 ends

Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant
Morgan Hill, California
BAC Job # 2023-011
Prepared For:

Raney Planning & Management, Inc.

Prepared By:

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc.

Dario Gotchet, Principal Consultant
May 1, 2023
Attn: Malena Garcia
1501 Sports Drive, Suite A
Sacramento, CA, 95834
Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. ● P.O. Box 7968, Auburn, CA 95604 ● Phone: (530) 537-2328 ● bacnoise.com Item 4
Attachment 8

Page 538 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 1 ends

CEQA Checklist
NOISE AND VIBRATION –
Would the Project Result in:

NA – Not
Applicable
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Generation of substantial temporary
or permanent increase in ambient
noise levels in the vicinity of the project
in excess of standards established in
the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
X
b) Generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundborne
noise levels?
X
c) For a project located within the
vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
X

Page 539 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 2 ends

Introduction
The proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant (project) is located at 18599 Sutter Boulevard in Morgan Hill, California. The project consists of the demolition of an existing building and construction of a new quick-service restaurant (QSR) building, a small outdoor patio dining area, a two-lane drive-thru lane, and associated parking stalls. Land uses in the immediate project vicinity include existing commercial/office to the north (financial institution), south (medical offices), and east (financial institution), and future commercial/transient lodging to the west (hotel). The project area with aerial imagery is shown in Figure 1. The project site plan is presented in Figure 2.

The purposes of this assessment are to quantify the existing noise and vibration environments, identify potential noise and vibration impacts resulting from the project, identify appropriate mitigation measures, and provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of impacts associated with the project. Specifically, impacts are identified if project-related activities would cause a substantial increase in ambient noise levels at existing or future uses in the project vicinity, or if traffic or project-generated noise or vibration levels would exceed applicable federal, state, or City of Morgan Hill standards at nearby existing or future uses.

Noise and Vibration Fundamentals
Noise
Noise is often described as unwanted sound. Sound is defined as any pressure variation in air that the human ear can detect. If the pressure variations occur frequently enough (at least 20 times per second), they can be heard and are designated as sound. The number of pressure variations per second is called the frequency of sound and is expressed as cycles per second, or Hertz (Hz). Definitions of acoustical terminology are provided in Appendix A.

Measuring sound directly in terms of pressure would require a very large and awkward range of numbers. To avoid this, the decibel scale was devised. The decibel scale uses the hearing threshold (20 micropascals of pressure) as a point of reference, defined as 0 dB. Other sound pressures are then compared to the reference pressure, and the logarithm is taken to keep the numbers in a practical range. The decibel scale allows a million-fold increase in pressure to be expressed as 120 dB. Another useful aspect of the decibel scale is that changes in decibel levels correspond closely to human perception of relative loudness. Noise levels associated with common noise sources are provided in Figure 3.

The perceived loudness of sounds is dependent upon many factors, including sound pressure level and frequency content. However, within the usual range of environmental noise levels, perception of loudness is relatively predictable and can be approximated by filtering the frequency response of a sound level meter by means of the standardized A-weighting network. There is a strong correlation between A-weighted sound levels (expressed as dBA) and community response to noise. For this reason, the A-weighted sound level has become the standard tool of environmental noise assessment. All noise levels reported in this section are in terms of A-weighted levels.

Page 540 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 3 ends

Community noise is commonly described in terms of the ambient noise level, which is defined as the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given noise environment. A common statistical tool to measure the ambient noise level is the average, or equivalent, sound level (Leq).

The Leq is the foundation of the day-night average noise descriptor, DNL (or Ldn), and shows very good correlation with community response to noise.

The Day-Night Average sound level (DNL) is based upon the average noise level over a 24-hour day, with a +10-decibel weighting applied to noise occurring during nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) hours. The nighttime penalty is based upon the assumption that people react to nighttime noise exposures as though they were twice as loud as daytime exposures. Because DNL represents a 24-hour average, it tends to disguise short-term variations in the noise environment.

DNL-based noise standards are commonly used to assess noise impacts associated with traffic, railroad, and aircraft noise sources.

Vibration
Vibration is like noise in that it involves a source, a transmission path, and a receiver. While vibration is related to noise, it differs in that noise is generally considered to be pressure waves transmitted through air, while vibration is usually associated with transmission through the ground or structures. As with noise, vibration consists of an amplitude and frequency. A person’s response to vibration will depend on their individual sensitivity as well as the amplitude and frequency of the source.

Vibration can be described in terms of acceleration, velocity, or displacement. A common practice is to monitor vibration in terms of velocity in inches per second peak particle velocity (IPS, PPV) or root-mean-square (VdB, RMS). Standards pertaining to perception as well as damage to structures have been developed for vibration in terms of peak particle velocity as well as RMS velocities. As vibrations travel outward from the source, they excite the particles of rock and soil through which they pass and cause them to oscillate. Differences in subsurface geologic conditions and distance from the source of vibration will result in different vibration levels characterized by different frequencies and intensities. In all cases, vibration amplitudes will decrease with increasing distance. The maximum rate, or velocity of particle movement, is the commonly accepted descriptor of the vibration “strength”.

Human response to vibration is difficult to quantify. Vibration can be felt or heard well below the levels that produce any damage to structures. The duration of the event has an effect on human response, as does frequency. Generally, as the duration and vibration frequency increase, the potential for adverse human response increases.

According to the Transportation and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans, June 2004), operation of construction equipment and construction techniques generate ground vibration. Traffic traveling on roadways can also be a source of such vibration. At high enough amplitudes, ground vibration has the potential to damage structures and/or cause cosmetic damage. Ground vibration can also be a source of annoyance to individuals who live or work close to vibration-generating activities. However, traffic, rarely generates vibration amplitudes high enough to cause structural or cosmetic damage.

Page 541 of 817 ends

Legend
Figure 1
Chick-fil-A Restaurant
Morgan Hill, CA
Project Area
Project Parcel Boundary (Approximate)
0 100 200
Scale (Feet)
Ambient Noise & Vibration Survey Locations
Cochrane Rd
Commercial/Office
Financial Institution
Commercial/Office
Financial Institution
Commercial/Office
Medical Offices
Future Hotel
Sutter Blvd
Evergreen Vlg
Skipper Ln
Jarvis Dr
B
A

Page 542 of 817 ends

Legend
Figure 2
Drive-Thru Menu Speaker Boards (2)
Outdoor Patio
Truck Delivery Area (Assumed)
Chick-fil-A Restaurant
Morgan Hill, CA
Project Site Plan
Future Hotel
Commercial/Office
Medical Offices
0 40 80
Scale (Feet)

Page 543 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 6 ends

Figure 3
Noise Levels Associated with Common Noise Sources

Page 544 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 7 ends

Regulatory Setting: Criteria for Acceptable Noise and Vibration Exposure
Federal
There are no federal noise or vibration criteria which would be directly applicable to this project.

However, the City of Morgan Hill does not currently have adopted numeric standards for groundborne vibration. As a result, the following federal noise criteria was applied to the project.

Federal Transit Administration
Vibration impact criteria developed by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) were applied to the project. The FTA criteria applicable to damage and annoyance from vibration typically associated with construction activities are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1
FTA Criteria for Assessing Vibration Damage to Structures Building Category Level (VdB)1
I. Reinforced-concrete, steel or timber (no plaster) 102 II. Engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster) 98
III. Non-engineered timber and masonry buildings 94
IV. Buildings extremely susceptible to vibration damage 90 1 RMS velocity in decibels (VdB) re 1 micro-inch/second Source: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Noise and Vibration Manual, Table 12-3 Table 2
Groundborne Vibration Impact Criteria for General Assessment Land Use Category
Impact Levels (VdB)
Frequent
Eventsa
Occasional
Eventsb
Infrequent
Eventsc
Category 1: Buildings where vibration would interfere with interior ops. 65d 65d 65d Category 2: Residences and buildings where people normally sleep 72 75 80 Category 3: Institutional land uses with primarily daytime uses 75 78 83 a. “Frequent Events” is defined as more than 70 vibration events of the same source per day. b. “Occasional Events” is defined as between 30 and 70 vibration events of the same source per day. c. “Infrequent Events” is defined as fewer than 30 vibration events of the same source per day. d. This criterion limit is based on levels that are acceptable for most moderately-sensitive equipment such as optical microscopes.

Vibration-sensitive manufacturing or research will require detailed evaluation to define the acceptable vibration levels.

Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment, May 2006.

State of California
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The State of California has established regulatory criteria that are applicable to this assessment.

Specifically, Appendix G of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines are used to assess the potential significance of impacts pursuant to local General Plan policies,

Page 545 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 8 ends

Municipal Code standards, or the applicable standards of other agencies. According to Appendix G of the CEQA guidelines, the project would result in a significant noise or vibration impact if the following occur:

A. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or other applicable standards of other agencies.

B. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels.

C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, the project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

It should be noted that audibility is not a test of significance according to CEQA. If this were the case, any project which added any audible amount of noise to the environment would be considered significant according to CEQA. Because every physical process creates noise, the use of audibility alone as significance criteria would be unworkable. CEQA requires a substantial increase in noise levels before noise impacts are identified, not simply an audible change.

Local
Morgan Hill 2035 General Plan
The Safety, Services, and Infrastructure Element of the Morgan Hill 2035 General Plan contains goals and policies to ensure that city residents are not subjected to noise beyond acceptable levels. The General Plan goals and policies which are applicable to the project are reproduced below.

GOAL SSI-8
Prevention of noise from interfering with human activities or causing health problems.

Policies
SSI-8.1 Exterior Noise Level Standards. Require new development projects to be designed and constructed to meet acceptable exterior noise level standards (Table 3 of this report), as follows:
• Apply a maximum exterior noise level of 60 dBA DNL in residential areas where outdoor use is a major consideration (e.g., backyards in single-family housing developments and recreation areas in multi-family housing projects). Where the City determines that providing a DNL of 60 dBA or lower cannot be achieved after the application of reasonable and feasible mitigation, a DNL of 65 dBA may be permitted.
• Indoor noise levels should not exceed a DNL of 45 dBA in new residential housing units.

Page 546 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 9 ends

• Noise levels in new residential development exposed to an exterior DNL of 60 dBA or greater should be limited to a maximum instantaneous noise level (e.g., trucks on busy streets, train warning whistles) in bedrooms of 50 dBA. Maximum instantaneous noise levels in all other habitable rooms should not exceed 55 dBA. The maximum outdoor noise level for new residences near the railroad shall be 70 dBA DNL, recognizing that train noise is characterized by relatively few loud events.

SSI-8.2 Impact Evaluation. The impact of a proposed development project on existing land uses should be evaluated in terms of the potential for adverse community response based on significant increase in existing noise levels, regardless of compatibility guidelines.

SSI-8.3 Commercial and Industrial Noise Level Standards. Evaluate interior noise levels in commercial and industrial structures on a case-by-case basis based on the use of the space.

SSI-8.4 Office Noise Level Standards. Interior noise levels in office buildings should be maintained at 45 dB Leq (hourly average) or less, rather than 45 dB DNL (daily average).

SSI-8.5 Traffic Noise Level Standards. Consider noise level increases resulting from traffic associated with new projects significant if: a) the noise level increase is 5 dBA DNL or greater, with a future noise level of less than 60 dBA DNL, or b) the noise level increase is 3 dBA DNL or greater, with a future noise level of 60 dBA DNL or greater.

SSI-8.6 Stationary Noise Level Standards. Consider noise levels produced by stationary noise sources associated with new projects significant if they substantially exceed existing ambient noise levels.

SSI-8.7 Other Noise Sources. Consider noise levels produced by other noise sources (such as ballfields) significant if an acoustical study demonstrates they would substantially exceed ambient noise levels.

SSI-8.9 Site Planning and Design. Require attention to site planning and design techniques other than sound walls to reduce noise impacts, including a) installing earth berms, b) increasing the distance between the noise source and the receiver, c) using non-sensitive structures such as parking lots, utility areas, and garages to shield noise-sensitive areas, d) orienting buildings to shield outdoor spaces from the noise source, and e) minimizing the noise at its source.

Page 547 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 10 ends

Table 3
State of California Land Use Compatibility Guidelines for Community Noise Environments Morgan Hill Municipal Code
The provisions of the Morgan Hill Municipal Code which would be most applicable to this project are reproduced below.

Chapter 8.28 of the Municipal Code provides an enumeration of unlawful noise sources (i.e., animals, birds, auto body repairs, blowers, fans, combustion engines, construction activities, exhausts, loudspeakers). Chapter 8.28 does not, however, provide quantitative performance standards. Section 8.28.040(D) exempts construction noise provided the activities are limited to a specific time frame. Section 8.28.040(D) is reproduced below:
"Construction activities" are defined as including but not limited to excavation, grading, paving, demolition, construction, alteration or repair of any building, site, street or highway, delivery, or removal of construction material to a site, or movement of construction materials on a site. Construction activities are prohibited other than between the hours of seven a.m. and eight p.m., Monday through Friday and between the hours of nine a.m. to six p.m. on Saturday. Construction activities may not occur on Sundays or federal holidays. No third person, including but not limited to landowners, construction company owners, contractors,

Page 548 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 11 ends

subcontractors, or employers, shall permit or allow any person working on construction activities which are under their ownership, control, or direction to violate this provision.

Section 18.76.090 of the Municipal Code establishes acceptable noise level criteria for nontransportation noise sources. The City’s quantitative exterior noise standards are provided below in Table 4. According to conversations with City of Morgan Hill planning staff in the preparation of noise assessments in previous years, the Table 4 standards are interpreted as being hourly average (Leq) noise level standards.

Table 4
Noise Level Performance Standards
Receiving Land Use Maximum Noise Level at Lot Line of Receiving Use1,2 Industrial and Wholesale 70 dBA
Commercial 65 dBA
Residential or Public/Quasi Public 60 dBA
1 The planning commission may allow an additional 5 dBA noise level at the lot line if the maximum noise level shown above cannot be achieved with reasonable and feasible mitigation. 2 Noise standards shown above do not apply to noise generated by vehicle traffic in the public rightof way or from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter or leave the site of the noise-generating use (e.g., construction equipment, trains, trucks).

Source: Morgan Hill Municipal Code, Section 18.76.090, Table 18.76-1.

Finally, Municipal Code Section 18.76.130 states that vibration transmitted through the ground that is discernible without instruments at the lot line of the establishment or use is prohibited.

However, vibrations from temporary construction, demolition, and vehicles that enter and leave the lot (e.g., construction equipment, trains, trucks, etc.) are exempt from this standard.

Environmental Setting – Existing Ambient Noise and Vibration Environment
Noise-Sensitive Land Uses in the Project Vicinity
Noise-sensitive land uses are generally defined as locations where people reside or where the presence of unwanted sound could adversely affect the primary intended use of the land. Places where people live, sleep, recreate, worship, and study are generally considered to be sensitive to noise because intrusive noise can be disruptive to these activities.

The City of Morgan Hill has established noise level criteria for commercial uses, such as those located adjacent to the project (existing and future). At the direction of City planning staff, an analysis of project-generated noise and vibration level exposure has been requested at the existing commercial use to the south (medical offices) and future commercial/transient lodging use to the west (hotel). The project area and surrounding land uses are shown in Figure 1.

Page 549 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 12 ends

Existing Overall Ambient Noise Environment within the Project Vicinity The existing ambient noise environment within the project vicinity is defined primarily by noise from traffic on Cochrane Road and Sutter Boulevard, and by activities at nearby commercial uses.

To generally quantify existing ambient noise environment within the project vicinity, BAC conducted short-term (3-hour) ambient noise level measurements at two (2) locations on February 14th, 2023. The noise survey locations are shown in Figure 1, identified as Sites A and B.

Photographs of the noise survey locations are provided in Appendix B.

Larson Davis Laboratories (LDL) Models 820 precision integrating sound level meters were used to complete the noise level measurements. The meters were calibrated immediately before use with an LDL Model CA200 acoustical calibrator to ensure the accuracy of the measurements. The equipment used meets all specifications of the American National Standards Institute requirements for Type 1 sound level meters (ANSI S1.4). The ambient noise level survey results are summarized below in Table 5.

Table 5
Summary of Short-Term Ambient Noise Survey Results – February 14th, 2023 Survey Location1 Time Period
Average Measured Noise Levels (dBA)
Leq Lmax
Site A: Along western project
property line
10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. 58.0 93.6
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 58.3 93.9
12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. 58.2 93.8
Site B: Along southern project
property line
10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. 60.3 77.5
11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 58.3 86.8
12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. 58.4 78.2
1 Noise survey site locations are shown in Figure 1.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2023.

Noise level measurements obtained at Site A, located along the western project property boundary, are believed to be representative of the existing ambient noise level environment along the adjacent commercial boundary to the west. Noise level measurements obtained at Site B, located at the southern end of the project parcel, are believed to be representative of the ambient noise level environment at the existing commercial office uses to the south.

Existing Ambient Vibration Environment within the Project Vicinity During a BAC site visit on February 14h, 2023, vibration levels were below the threshold of perception within the project area. Nonetheless, to quantify existing vibration levels in the project vicinity, BAC conducted a short-term (15-minute) vibration survey on February 14th, 2023, at Sites A and B in Figure 1. Photographs of the vibration survey equipment are provided in Appendix B.

A Larson-Davis Laboratories Model LxT precision integrating sound level meter equipped with a vibration transducer was used to complete the measurements. The results are summarized in Table 6.

Page 550 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 13 ends

Table 6
Summary of Short-Term Ambient Vibration Survey Results – February 14th, 2023 Survey Location Time
Average Measured Vibration
Level (VdB)
Site A: Along western project property line 12:52 p.m. 35 Site B: Along southern project property line 12:32 p.m. 39 Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2023.

Table 6 data indicate that measured average vibration levels were well below the threshold of human perception (65 dB VdB), which is consistent with BAC field observations.

Existing Traffic Noise Levels along the Project Area Roadway Network To predict traffic noise levels along existing roadway networks, modelling is commonly used rather than monitoring. The FHWA Traffic Noise Model (FHWA-RD-77-108) was used to quantify existing traffic noise levels at the existing sensitive land uses nearest to the project area roadway network. The FHWA Model was also used to quantify the distances to the 60, 65 and 70 dB DNL traffic noise contours for these roadways. The FHWA Model predicts hourly average (Leq) values for free-flowing traffic conditions. Estimates of the hourly distribution of traffic for a typical 24-hour period were used to develop day-night average (DNL) values from Leq values.

Existing traffic data in the form of AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movements were provided by the project transportation consultant (Hexagon Transportation Consultants). Those data were converted to Average Daily Traffic (ADT) segment volumes by applying a factor of 5 to the sum of AM and PM peak hour conditions. Other inputs were obtained from BAC field observations and aerial imagery. The existing traffic noise levels at the distances representing the nearest sensitive land uses to the project area roadways and distances from the centerlines of selected roadways to the 60 dB, 65 dB and 70 dB DNL contours are summarized in Table 7.

Appendix C contains the FHWA Model inputs for existing conditions.

Page 551 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 14 ends

Table 7
Existing Traffic Noise Levels at Nearest Sensitive Receptors and Distances to DNL Contours # Roadway Segment Description
DNL at
Nearest
Sensitive
Receptor
Distance to Contour (ft)
70 dB
DNL
65 dB
DNL
60 dB
DNL
1 Monterey Rd North of Cochrane Rd 63 54 115 249
2 Monterey Rd South of Cochrane Rd 67 69 148 319
3 Cochrane Rd Monterey Rd to Butterfield Blvd 64 56 120 259 4 Cochrane Rd Butterfield Blvd to Evergreen Vlg 64 61 131 282 5 Cochrane Rd Evergreen Vlg to Sutter Blvd 64 60 129 278 6 Cochrane Rd Sutter Blvd to Madrone Pkwy 66 79 170 367 7 Cochrane Rd Madrone Pkwy to US 101 SB Ramps 67 66 141 304 8 Cochrane Rd US 101 SB Ramps to US 101 NB Ramps 61 81 176 378 9 Cochrane Rd East of US 101 NB Ramps 64 51 111 239
10 Butterfield Blvd South of Cochrane Rd -- -- -- --
11 Woodview Ave North of Cochrane Rd 53 8 17 38
12 Evergreen Vlg South of Cochrane Rd 49 4 8 17
13 Sutter Blvd North of Cochrane Rd 62 21 46 99
14 Sutter Blvd Cochrane Rd to Cochrane Plza 60 23 50 108 15 Sutter Blvd South of Cochrane Plza 62 21 46 100
16 Madrone Pkwy North of Cochrane Rd 59 14 30 64
17 Cochrane Plza South of Cochrane Rd 63 18 40 85
18 Cochrane Plza West of Sutter Blvd 50 9 19 40
19 Cochrane Plza East of Sutter Blvd 49 2 4 9
20 US 101 SB Ramps South of Cochrane Rd 69 85 184 397
21 US 101 NB Ramps North of Cochrane Rd 61 51 110 238
Source: FHWA-RD-77-108 and Hexagon. Appendix C contains FHWA Model inputs for existing conditions.

Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Thresholds of Significance
For the purposes of this report, a noise and vibration impact is considered significant if the project would result in:
• Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or other applicable standards of other agencies; or • Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; or • For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use

Page 552 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 15 ends

airport, the project would expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

The project area is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip, an airport land use plan, or within two miles of a public airport. Therefore, the last threshold listed above is not discussed further.

The following criteria established by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Morgan Hill General Plan, and Morgan Hill Municipal Code were used to evaluate the significance of environmental noise and vibration resulting from the project:
• A significant noise impact would be identified if the project would expose persons to or generate noise levels that would exceed applicable noise criteria presented in the Morgan Hill General Plan or Morgan Hill Municipal Code.
• A significant impact would be identified if project-generated off-site traffic, on-site commercial operations, or on-site demolition/construction activities would substantially increase noise levels at existing sensitive receptors in the vicinity. A substantial increase from project-generated off-site traffic noise levels would be identified relative to the numeric increase significance criteria contained in Policy SSI-8.5 of the Morgan Hill General Plan.

General Plan Policy SSI-8.6 states that noise levels produced by stationary noise sources associated with new projects shall be considered significant if they substantially exceed existing ambient noise levels. However, Policy SSI-8.6 does not contain numeric increase significance criteria. In terms of determining the temporary noise increase due to project on-site operations and demolition/construction activities (non-transportation noise sources) at existing sensitive receptors in the vicinity, an impact would occur if those activities would noticeably increase ambient noise levels above background levels at those locations. The threshold of perception of the human ear is approximately 3 to 5 dB – a 5 dB change is considered to be clearly noticeable. For the analysis of project on-site commercial operations and demolition/construction activity noise level increases at existing sensitive receptors, a noticeable increase in ambient noise levels is assumed to occur where those activities would result in an increase by 5 dB or more over existing ambient noise levels.
• A significant impact would be identified if on-site project demolition/construction activities or project operations would expose existing or proposed sensitive receptors to excessive groundborne vibration levels. Specifically, an impact would be identified if groundborne vibration levels due to these sources would exceed FTA vibration impact criteria.

Noise Impacts Associated with Project-Generated Increases in Off-Site Traffic With development of the project, traffic volumes on the local roadway network will increase.

Those increases in daily traffic volumes will result in a corresponding increase in traffic noise levels at existing uses located along those roadways. Impacts 1 and 2 evaluate increases in offsite traffic noise levels which would result from the project.

Page 553 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 16 ends

Pursuant to Policy SSI-8.5 of the Morgan Hill General Plan, traffic noise level increases from new projects are considered significant if: a) the noise level increase is 5 dB DNL or greater, with a future noise level of less than 60 dB DNL, or b) the noise level increase is 3 dB DNL or greater, with a future noise level of 60 dB DNL or greater.

Impact 1: Increases in Existing Traffic Noise Levels due to the Project The FHWA Traffic Noise Model (FHWA-RD-77-108) was used to quantify increases in existing traffic noise levels at the existing sensitive land uses nearest to the project area roadway network.

The FHWA Model predicts hourly Leq values for free-flowing traffic conditions. Estimates of the hourly distribution of traffic for a typical 24-hour period were used to develop DNL values from Leq values.

Traffic data in the form of peak hour intersection turning movements were provided by the project transportation consultant (Hexagon Transportation Consultants). Those data were converted to Average Daily Traffic (ADT) segment volumes by applying a factor of 5 to the sum of AM and PM peak hour conditions. Other inputs were obtained from BAC field observations and aerial imagery. Appendices C and D contain the FHWA Model inputs for existing and existing plus project conditions, respectively. The existing and existing plus project traffic noise levels at the distances representing the nearest sensitive land uses to the project area roadways are summarized in Table 8. Table 8 also shows the thresholds for determination of a significant traffic noise increase, whether the roadway segment contains sensitive uses, and whether or not significant noise impacts are identified for each segment.

It should be noted that the FHWA Model predictions presented in Table 8 are based on inputs that include weekday peak hour traffic volumes, day/night, and truck type percentages (e.g., medium and heavy trucks), vehicle speed, and distance from roadway centerlines. The FHWA Model does not account for non-traffic ambient noise sources such as nearby wildlife (e.g., birds chipping) or other anthropogenic noise sources within an area (e.g., distant traffic from other roadways, recreational activities, commercial or industrial operations, etc.).

Page 554 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 17 ends

Table 8
Predicted Traffic Noise Level Increases at Existing Sensitive Receptors – Existing vs. Existing Plus Project Conditions # Roadway Segment Description
Predicted DNL (dB)
Significance
Threshold1
Threshold
Exceeded?
Sensitive
Receptors
Present?2
Significant
Impact
Identified? E E+P 3 Increase
1 Monterey Rd North of Cochrane Rd 63.3 63.3 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 2 Monterey Rd South of Cochrane Rd 66.9 66.9 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 3 Cochrane Rd Monterey Rd to Butterfield Blvd 63.6 63.6 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 4 Cochrane Rd Butterfield Blvd to Evergreen Vlg 64.1 64.2 0.1 3.0 No No No 5 Cochrane Rd Evergreen Vlg to Sutter Blvd 64.0 64.1 0.1 3.0 No No No 6 Cochrane Rd Sutter Blvd to Madrone Pkwy 65.8 65.9 0.0 3.0 No No No 7 Cochrane Rd Madrone Pkwy to US 101 SB Ramps 67.2 67.3 0.0 3.0 No No No 8 Cochrane Rd US 101 SB Ramps to US 101 NB Ramps 61.2 61.2 0.0 3.0 No No No 9 Cochrane Rd East of US 101 NB Ramps 64.2 64.3 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 10 Butterfield Blvd South of Cochrane Rd -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 Woodview Ave North of Cochrane Rd 53.0 53.5 0.5 5.0 No No No 12 Evergreen Vlg South of Cochrane Rd 48.5 48.5 0.0 5.0 No No No 13 Sutter Blvd North of Cochrane Rd 61.8 62.2 0.4 3.0 No No No 14 Sutter Blvd Cochrane Rd to Cochrane Plza 60.5 60.6 0.1 3.0 No No No 15 Sutter Blvd South of Cochrane Plza 61.9 62.2 0.4 3.0 No No No 16 Madrone Pkwy North of Cochrane Rd 59.0 59.0 0.0 5.0 No No No 17 Cochrane Plza South of Cochrane Rd 63.5 63.5 0.0 3.0 No No No 18 Cochrane Plza West of Sutter Blvd 49.6 49.6 0.0 5.0 No No No 19 Cochrane Plza East of Sutter Blvd 48.7 54.1 5.4 5.0 Yes No No 20 US 101 SB Ramps South of Cochrane Rd 69.0 69.0 0.0 3.0 No No No 21 US 101 NB Ramps North of Cochrane Rd 61.1 61.2 0.1 3.0 No No No 1 Significance thresholds contained in General Plan Policy SSI-8.5. 2 Sensitive receptors identified in this analysis include residences and churches. 3 A significant impact is identified only along segments where the project-related traffic noise level increase would exceed applicable significance threshold AND where sensitive receptors are present along the roadway segment.

Source: FHWA-RD-77-108 with inputs from Hexagon. Appendices C & D contain FHWA Model inputs.

Page 555 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 18 ends

As indicated in Table 8, project-generated traffic noise level increases would not result in significant noise impacts at existing sensitive receptors located along the project area roadway network relative to increase significance criteria contained in Policy SSI-8.5 of the Morgan Hill General Plan. As a result, this impact is identified as being less than significant.

Impact 2: Increases in Cumulative Traffic Noise Levels due to the Project The FHWA Traffic Noise Model (FHWA-RD-77-108) was used to quantify increases in future (cumulative) traffic noise levels at the nearest existing sensitive land uses to the project area roadway network. This analysis first assesses whether a cumulative roadway noise impact would occur by comparing the cumulative with project conditions to existing conditions. If a cumulative roadway noise impact is identified, it is further evaluated to assess whether the proposed project would make a cumulatively considerable contribution to the cumulative impact. This process is completed through a comparison of the roadway noise associated with the cumulative with project scenario against the cumulative no-project scenario. Appendices E and F contain the FHWA Model inputs for cumulative and cumulative plus project conditions, respectively.

Table 9 compares the cumulative with project traffic noise levels against existing no project traffic noise levels and includes a determination regarding whether the corresponding increase in traffic noise exposure over time is considerable. Table 10 compares cumulative with project against cumulative no-project conditions to determine if the project’s contribution to the cumulative noise environment is considerable.

Page 556 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 19 ends

Table 9
Predicted Traffic Noise Level Increases at Existing Sensitive Receptors – Existing vs. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions # Roadway Segment Description
Predicted DNL (dB)
Significance
Threshold1
Threshold
Exceeded?
Sensitive
Receptors
Present?2
Significant
Impact
Identified? E C+P 3 Increase
1 Monterey Rd North of Cochrane Rd 63.3 64.4 1.1 3.0 No Yes No 2 Monterey Rd South of Cochrane Rd 66.9 68.3 1.3 3.0 No Yes No 3 Cochrane Rd Monterey Rd to Butterfield Blvd 63.6 64.5 1.0 3.0 No Yes No 4 Cochrane Rd Butterfield Blvd to Evergreen Vlg 64.1 65.3 1.2 3.0 No No No 5 Cochrane Rd Evergreen Vlg to Sutter Blvd 64.0 65.0 1.0 3.0 No No No 6 Cochrane Rd Sutter Blvd to Madrone Pkwy 65.8 66.7 0.9 3.0 No No No 7 Cochrane Rd Madrone Pkwy to US 101 SB Ramps 67.2 68.5 1.2 3.0 No No No 8 Cochrane Rd US 101 SB Ramps to US 101 NB Ramps 61.2 62.0 0.9 3.0 No No No 9 Cochrane Rd East of US 101 NB Ramps 64.2 65.9 1.7 3.0 No Yes No 10 Butterfield Blvd South of Cochrane Rd -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 Woodview Ave North of Cochrane Rd 53.0 56.7 3.7 5.0 No No No 12 Evergreen Vlg South of Cochrane Rd 48.5 48.5 0.0 5.0 No No No 13 Sutter Blvd North of Cochrane Rd 61.8 63.0 1.2 3.0 No No No 14 Sutter Blvd Cochrane Rd to Cochrane Plza 60.5 61.4 0.9 3.0 No No No 15 Sutter Blvd South of Cochrane Plza 61.9 63.0 1.2 3.0 No No No 16 Madrone Pkwy North of Cochrane Rd 59.0 59.0 0.0 5.0 No No No 17 Cochrane Plza South of Cochrane Rd 63.5 64.5 1.0 3.0 No No No 18 Cochrane Plza West of Sutter Blvd 49.6 49.6 0.0 5.0 No No No 19 Cochrane Plza East of Sutter Blvd 48.7 54.1 5.4 5.0 Yes No No 20 US 101 SB Ramps South of Cochrane Rd 69.0 70.0 1.0 3.0 No No No 21 US 101 NB Ramps North of Cochrane Rd 61.1 61.7 0.5 3.0 No No No 1 Significance thresholds contained in General Plan Policy SSI-8.5. 2 Sensitive receptors identified in this analysis include residences and churches. 3 A significant impact is identified only along segments where the project-related traffic noise level increase would exceed applicable significance threshold AND where sensitive receptors are present along the roadway segment.

Source: FHWA-RD-77-108 with inputs from Hexagon. Appendices C & F contain FHWA Model inputs.

Page 557 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 20 ends

Table 10
Predicted Traffic Noise Level Increases at Existing Sensitive Receptors – Cumulative vs. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions # Roadway Segment Description
Predicted DNL (dB)
Significance
Threshold1
Threshold
Exceeded?
Sensitive
Receptors
Present?2
Significant
Impact
Identified? C C+P 3 Increase
1 Monterey Rd North of Cochrane Rd 64.3 64.4 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 2 Monterey Rd South of Cochrane Rd 68.3 68.3 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 3 Cochrane Rd Monterey Rd to Butterfield Blvd 64.5 64.5 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 4 Cochrane Rd Butterfield Blvd to Evergreen Vlg 65.3 65.3 0.0 3.0 No No No 5 Cochrane Rd Evergreen Vlg to Sutter Blvd 65.0 65.0 0.1 3.0 No No No 6 Cochrane Rd Sutter Blvd to Madrone Pkwy 66.7 66.7 0.0 3.0 No No No 7 Cochrane Rd Madrone Pkwy to US 101 SB Ramps 68.5 68.5 0.0 3.0 No No No 8 Cochrane Rd US 101 SB Ramps to US 101 NB Ramps 62.0 62.0 0.0 3.0 No No No 9 Cochrane Rd East of US 101 NB Ramps 65.9 65.9 0.0 3.0 No Yes No 10 Butterfield Blvd South of Cochrane Rd -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11 Woodview Ave North of Cochrane Rd 56.4 56.7 0.3 5.0 No No No 12 Evergreen Vlg South of Cochrane Rd 48.5 48.5 0.0 5.0 No No No 13 Sutter Blvd North of Cochrane Rd 62.7 63.0 0.3 3.0 No No No 14 Sutter Blvd Cochrane Rd to Cochrane Plza 61.3 61.4 0.1 3.0 No No No 15 Sutter Blvd South of Cochrane Plza 62.7 63.0 0.3 3.0 No No No 16 Madrone Pkwy North of Cochrane Rd 59.0 59.0 0.0 5.0 No No No 17 Cochrane Plza South of Cochrane Rd 64.5 64.5 0.0 3.0 No No No 18 Cochrane Plza West of Sutter Blvd 49.6 49.6 0.0 5.0 No No No 19 Cochrane Plza East of Sutter Blvd 48.7 54.1 5.4 5.0 Yes No No 20 US 101 SB Ramps South of Cochrane Rd 70.0 70.0 0.0 3.0 No No No 21 US 101 NB Ramps North of Cochrane Rd 61.6 61.7 0.0 3.0 No No No 1 Significance thresholds contained in General Plan Policy SSI-8.5. 2 Sensitive receptors identified in this analysis include residences and churches. 3 A significant impact is identified only along segments where the project-related traffic noise level increase would exceed applicable significance threshold AND where sensitive receptors are present along the roadway segment.

Source: FHWA-RD-77-108 with inputs from Hexagon. Appendices E & F contain FHWA Model inputs.

Page 558 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 21 ends

Based on the analysis presented in Tables 9 and 10, off-site traffic noise impacts related to project-generated increases in traffic are identified as less than significant relative to increase significance criteria contained in Policy SSI-8.5 of the Morgan Hill General Plan.

Off-Site Noise Impacts Associated with On-Site Operational Noise Sources The project consists of the construction and operation of a Chick-fil-A restaurant with drivethrough services. It is the understanding of BAC that the project proposes restaurant operations (including drive-through services) during the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The primary noise sources associated with project on-site operations have been identified as parking lot movements, drive-thru operations (vehicle passages and amplified menu speaker board), on-site vehicle circulation, outdoor patio noise (patrons conversing), delivery truck circulation and delivery activities, and mechanical equipment (HVAC). Analyses of each of the identified project noise sources at the future commercial use to the west (hotel) and existing commercial use to the south (medical offices) are provided in the following section.

For noise generated by on-site operations, Section 18.76.090 of the Morgan Hill Municipal Code establishes a property line exterior noise level standard of 65 dB Leq for commercial uses.

Additionally, Policy SSI-8.4 of the Morgan Hill General Plan states that interior noise levels in office buildings should be maintained at 45 dB Leq. Satisfaction of the City’s noise level criteria at the closest commercial uses would ensure compliance with the City’s noise level limits at commercial uses located farther away.

Impact 3: Parking Area Noise at Adjacent Commercial Land Uses As a means of determining potential noise exposure due to project parking lot activities, Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC) utilized specific parking lot noise level measurements conducted by BAC. Specifically, a series of individual noise measurements were conducted of multiple vehicle types arriving and departing a parking area, including engines starting and stopping, car doors opening and closing, and persons conversing as they entered and exited the vehicles. The results of those measurements revealed that individual parking lot movements generated mean noise levels of approximately 70 dB SEL at a reference distance of 50 feet.

To compute hourly average (Leq) noise levels generated by parking lot activities, the approximate number of hourly operations and distance to parking stalls is required. According to the project site plan, the project proposes parking stalls on the west and south sides of the project property (Figure 2). The hourly average noise level generated by parking lot movements is computed using the following formula:

Peak Hour Leq = 70+10*log (N) – 35.6
Where 70 is the mean Sound Exposure Level (SEL) for an automobile parking lot arrival or departure, N is the number of parking lot operations in a given hour, and 35.6 is 10 times the logarithm of the number of seconds in an hour. Using the information provided above, the provided project site plan, and assuming standard spherical spreading loss (-6 dB per doubling of distance), project parking activity noise exposure at the adjacent future and existing commercial uses was calculated and the results of those calculations are presented in Table 11.

Page 559 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 22 ends

The results presented in Table 11 include an analysis of noise exposure associated with a portion of the closest parking stalls to the adjacent commercial uses. It was conservatively assumed for the purposes of this analysis that those nearest parking stalls could either fill or empty during a given peak hour (although it is likely that parking area activity would be more spread out). The number of parking stalls utilized in the analysis are footnoted in Table 11.

Table 11
Predicted Parking Area Noise Levels at Adjacent Commercial Uses Receiver1 Direction
Assessment
Location
Predicted Noise Level, Leq
(dB)2
Future Commercial – Hotel West Property Line 54
Existing Commercial – Medical Offices South Property Line 45 Existing Commercial – Medical Offices South Building Facade 33 1 Locations of commercial land uses are shown in Figure 1. 2 Number of parking stalls included in analysis: Future Commercial-Hotel (15), Existing Commercial-Offices (25).

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2023.

As shown in Table 11, project parking area movements are predicted to satisfy the Municipal Code 65 dB Leq exterior noise level standard at the property lines of the adjacent future and existing commercial uses.

Standard building construction (e.g., stucco siding, STC-27 windows, door weather-stripping, exterior wall insulation, composition plywood roof), typically results in an exterior to interior noise reduction of approximately 25 dB with windows closed and approximately 15 dB with windows open. Given the predicted noise level at the building facade of the existing office building to the south shown in Table 11, and after consideration of the above-mentioned exterior to interior noise level reduction typically provided by standard building construction, project parking area noise level exposure is expected to be well below the General Plan’s interior noise level standard of 45 dB Leq within the closest existing office buildings.

Table 5 of this report contains the results from the BAC ambient noise survey at Site B, which is believed to be representative of the ambient noise environment at the existing commercial offices to the south of the project. Using the lowest measured average (Leq) noise levels at Site B during the survey, ambient plus project parking area noise level increases were calculated at the existing offices to the south. According to the results from that exercise, the project-generated increase in ambient daytime noise levels is calculated to be less than 0.1 dB Leq at the closest medical office buildings to the south (Note: For the purposes of this analysis, it is reasonably assumed that the hours of business for the existing medical offices to the south are during daytime hours only). The calculated increase in ambient daytime noise levels indicated above is well below the applied increase significance criterion of 5 dB.

Because noise exposure from project parking area activities is predicted to satisfy applicable Morgan Hill Municipal Code and General Plan noise level criteria at the adjacent commercial uses, and because noise level exposure from those activities is not calculated to significantly increase ambient noise levels at the closest existing commercial uses (medical offices), this impact is identified as being less than significant.

Page 560 of 817 ends

Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. (BAC)
Environmental Noise & Vibration Assessment
Chick-fil-A Restaurant – Morgan Hill, California

Page 23 ends

Impact 4: Drive-Thru Operations Noise at Adjacent Commercial Land Uses According to the project site plan, the proposed drive-through will have two (2) amplified menu speaker posts. Specifically, it is the understanding of BAC that the project proposes two (2) HME SPP2 speaker posts.

To quantify the noise emissions of the proposed drive-through speaker usage, BAC utilized noise level measurement data published by the speaker manufacturer (HM Electronics, Inc.). According to the manufacturers noise level data sheet, presented as Appendix G, the proposed HME SPP2 speaker post can incorporate automatic volume control (AVC), which adjusts outbound volume based on the ambient noise level environment. For example, assuming an outdoor ambient noise level of 45 dB, the speaker will adjust the volume of the system to 45 dB for a resulting overall sound level of 48 dB at a distance of 4 feet. Without the AVC option, the speaker reference noise level is 72 dB at 4 feet. To quantify the noise emissions of the proposed drive-through vehicle passages, BAC utilized noise measurement data collected for similar drive-through operations in the greater Sacramento area in recent years. BAC file data indicates that drive-through vehicle passages, including vehicle idling, have median and maximum noise levels of 60 dB Leq at a distance of 5 feet.

Using the BAC drive-through vehicle passby data and speaker manufacturer noise level measurements presented above, and assuming standard spherical spreading loss (-6 dB per doubling of distance), data were projected from the proposed drive-through lane and speaker posts to the adjacent future and existing commercial uses. The results of those projections are provided in Table 12. The results presented in Table 12 include conservative predictions of project drive-through speaker noise levels (i.e., AVC option not enabled).

Table 12
Predicted Drive-Through Noise Levels at Adjacent Commercial Uses Receiver1 Direction
Assessment
Location
Predicted Noise Level, Leq (dB)2
Speakers3 Vehicles
Future Commercial – Hotel West Property Line 44 37
Existing Commercial – Medical Offices South Property Line 34 50 Existing Commercial – Medical Offices South Building Facade 29 26 1 Locations of commercial land uses are shown in Figure 1. 2 Combined noise level from two speakers in operation simultaneously (worst-case). 3 Predicted speaker noise level with AVC option not enabled.

Source: Bollard Acoustical Consultants, Inc. 2023.

The Table 12 data indicate that project drive-through operations noise levels are predicted to satisfy the Municipal Code 65 dB Leq exterior noise level standard at the property lines of the adjacent future and existing commercial uses. It should be noted that activation of the drivethrough speaker model’s AVC option would further reduce speaker noise level exposure at adjacent commercial uses.

Based on the predicted exterior noise levels shown in Table 12, and after consideration of the exterior to interior noise level reduction typically provided by standard building construction (i.e.,

Page 561 of 817 ends
← All documents from this meeting