AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
PRIOR TO THE MEETING
AGENDA NO: PC
MEETING DATE: October 8, 2024
1 Steve Paige resident. DEAR CITY COUNCIL, I have in my last presentation given you the link to The “Federal GHG Protocol Scoping 3 handbook” at the following web location:
https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/standards/Corporate-Value-Chain-Accounting-Re poring-Standard_041613_2.pdf This handbook should be our energy Bible.
In Vistra’s GHG statement for 2023, Oops….Vistra has ignored ‘Scoping 3’ protocol energy accounting entirely. Here is their corporate GHG accounting screenshot:
2 Using‘Scoping 3’ indirect CO2 loss analysis, in CO2 grams/KWH, should be the first and foremost priority for this project. By omission; Vistra, PG&E property owners, and the Morro Bay Planning Department have no idea of the true CO2 consumption of this project.
I suspect this omission is on purpose.
3 ChatGBT can give you an informed guess as to why. It’s great at math. What A.I. computes for you is that the total project creates way too much CO2. First let's compare the grams/KWH for all forms of energy production.
4 Note Natural gas power plants are 400 to 600 grams/KWH total lifecycle cost. According to chatGBT, when wind farms are coupled with lithium battery storage they become shockingly high in CO2 pollution at 315 grams/KWH, almost equal to a natural gas power plant at contemporary efficiencies. 5 This is consistent with the Forbes Magazine Article on the subject here. Why the comparison to Coal and not natural gas?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2020/02/16/estimating-the-carbon-footprint-of-utility-s cale-battery-storage/
Screen captured here:
6 ChatGBT and Forbes are also consistent with Wind/BESS EROEI calculations from this Stanford University Undergrad GHG Coursebook. (EROEI energy graph) 7 Any EROEI below 7 is a bad dollar and CO2 investment. EROEI at 3.9 is a disaster to ratepayers and with little CO2 savings due to complicated and expensive infrastructure.
Council Members, Vistra doesn’t want you to see these facts.
My blessings to the City Council. Thank you for your time.
END
8 Vistra Sustainability Report 2023
https://vistracorp.com/documents/sustainability/reporting-year/2023/FY%202023%20Statement%20of%20GHG%20Emissions%20vFinal.pdf
CHATGBT CONVERSATION ADDENDUM
The grams of CO2 emitted per kWh of electricity generated varies significantly by energy source. Here’s a general overview:
1. Coal: Approximately 900–1,200 grams CO2/kWh
2. Natural Gas: About 400–600 grams CO2/kWh
3. Oil: Roughly 800–1,000 grams CO2/kWh
4. Biomass: Around 20–500 grams CO2/kWh (depending on the type and source)
5. Nuclear: Approximately 10–20 grams CO2/kWh (mostly from construction and mining)
6. Hydropower: About 1–30 grams CO2/kWh (mostly from construction and land use)
7. Wind: Roughly 10–20 grams CO2/kWh (mostly from manufacturing and installation)
8. Solar: Around 20–50 grams CO2/kWh (mainly from manufacturing solar panels) These values can vary based on technology, efficiency, and specific local conditions, but this should give you a general idea! 4o mini
You said:
When including GHG protocol scope 3 GHG for wind with battery power is 150 to 300 G/Kwh how do you account for such a disparity? ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
The disparity in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for wind power combined with battery storage, especially when considering the GHG Protocol Scope 3 emissions, can be attributed to several factors:
1. Life Cycle Emissions: Scope 3 includes indirect emissions from the entire life cycle of the technology, including:
○ Manufacturing and transportation of wind turbines and batteries. ○ Installation and maintenance.
9 ○ Decommissioning and disposal.
2. Battery Production: The production of batteries, particularly lithium-ion types, is energy-intensive and often relies on fossil fuels. This can significantly increase the overall emissions compared to wind alone.
3. Energy Mix for Manufacturing: The carbon footprint of the electricity used in manufacturing processes varies by region. If the manufacturing takes place in areas reliant on fossil fuels, emissions will be higher.
4. End-of-Life Considerations: The disposal or recycling of both wind turbine components and batteries can also add to emissions, depending on how these processes are managed.
5. Usage Efficiency: The efficiency of energy storage and conversion can also impact emissions. If a battery system has lower efficiency, more energy may need to be generated to meet the same demand, increasing overall emissions.
6. Scale and Integration: As more renewable energy and storage systems are integrated, the operational efficiency and the associated emissions may vary based on grid dynamics and local energy policies.
Considering these factors provides a fuller picture of the emissions associated with wind and battery systems, leading to higher estimates when Scope 3 emissions are included. This contrasts with the more simplified estimates that focus solely on operational emissions. 4o mini
You said:
Please recalculate.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
To recalculate GHG emissions for wind power with battery storage, considering the Scope 3 emissions, we can break it down into components:
1. Wind Power Emissions: As mentioned earlier, wind power typically has operational emissions around 10–20 grams CO2/kWh.
2. Battery Production Emissions:
○ The production of lithium-ion batteries can vary, but estimates often range from 100 to 200 grams CO2/kWh of storage capacity. This can be adjusted based on specific battery technology and local manufacturing conditions.
3. Total Emissions Calculation:
○ Operational Emissions from Wind: ~10–20 g CO2/kWh
○ Battery Production Emissions: If we assume a battery storage capacity of around 100 grams CO2/kWh, and if we consider a typical discharge cycle that might require several cycles for every kWh used (let's say 1.5 to 2 cycles for effective use), the effective emissions can increase significantly.
Example Calculation:
10 Assuming a 1 kWh usage from wind + battery:
● Wind Emissions: 15 g CO2/kWh (average)
● Battery Emissions (2 cycles): 100 g CO2/kWh × 2 = 200 g CO2 Total: 15 g + 200 g = 215 g CO2/kWh
Scope 3 Considerations:
Including Scope 3 emissions (like transportation, installation, and end-of-life):
● Additional emissions might range from 50 to 100 grams CO2/kWh, depending on the specifics.
Final Total Emissions:
● Total (including Scope 3): 215 g + 100 g = 315 g CO2/kWh Thus, total emissions for wind power with battery storage, considering Scope 3, could realistically range between 150 to 300 g CO2/kWh based on these calculations and assumptions. Adjusting for specific technologies, local conditions, and efficiencies could further refine this estimate. 4o mini
You said:
How many tons of CO2 for a 600 megawatt plant? at 315 grams per kilowatt? ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
To calculate the total CO2 emissions for a 600 megawatt (MW) plant operating at 315 grams of CO2 per kilowatt-hour (kWh), you can follow these steps:
1. Convert megawatts to kilowatts:
600 MW=600,000 kW600 \text{ MW} = 600,000 \text{ kW}600 MW=600,000 kW
2. Calculate the annual energy generation (assuming continuous operation for one year):
○ There are 8,760 hours in a year.
11 3. Annual Energy Generation=600,000 kW×8,760 hours=5,256,000,000 kWh\text{Annual Energy Generation} = 600,000 \text{ kW} \times 8,760 \text{ hours} = 5,256,000,000 \text{ kWh}Annual Energy Generation=600,000 kW×8,760 hours=5,256,000,000 kWh
4. Calculate total CO2 emissions:
Total CO2 Emissions (grams)=Annual Energy Generation×Emissions per kWh\text{Total CO2 Emissions (grams)} = \text{Annual Energy Generation} \times \text{Emissions per kWh}Total CO2 Emissions (grams)=Annual Energy Generation×Emissions per kWh Total CO2 Emissions=5,256,000,000 kWh×315 g CO2/kWh=1,655,640,000,000 grams CO2\text{Total CO2 Emissions} = 5,256,000,000 \text{ kWh} \times 315 \text{ g CO2/kWh} = 1,655,640,000,000 \text{ grams CO2}Total CO2 Emissions=5,256,000,000 kWh×315 g CO2/kWh=1,655,640,000,000 grams CO2
5. Convert grams to tons:
Total CO2 Emissions (tons)=1,655,640,000,000 grams1,000,000=1,655,640 tons CO2\text{Total CO2 Emissions (tons)} = \frac{1,655,640,000,000 \text{ grams}}{1,000,000} = 1,655,640 \text{ tons CO2}Total CO2 Emissions (tons)=1,000,0001,655,640,000,000 grams=1,655,640 tons CO2
So, a 600 MW plant operating continuously at 315 grams CO2 per kWh would emit approximately 1,655,640 tons of CO2 per year when including Scoping 1, 2, and 3 protocols.
chatGBT 4o mini
2 Regards,
Carol Swain
Notes:
https://www.morrobayca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/19488/City-Attorney-Impartial-Analysis-ofMorro-Bay-Measure-A-24- https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2024-06/Opt-In_Certification_Fact_Sheet_ada.pdf https://www.coastal.ca.gov/climate/whyinvolved.html
AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
PRIOR TO THE MEETING
AGENDA NO: 9a & 9c
MEETING DATE: October 8, 2024
Agenda Correspondence for MBCC 10/8/24
By JeƯ Heller
Business Item 9.a: Upgrades to Vet’s Hall
I am thrilled that we have $500K to make these improvements! Thank you, Mayor, council members, and hardworking staƯ! Looking forward to a new and improved Vet’s Hall! Business Item 9.c: RFQ for Market Plaza Property.
We are so fortunate to live in Morro Bay. We get to have direct input on how City property will be developed. There’s nothing better than that!
Here are my thoughts:
1. Shouldn’t we “get our ducks in a row” before spending additional funds on another plan?
2. We have a substantial backlog of plans, visions, etc. for this catalyst project parcel.
Rather than spending funds on another RFQ and the reports that would follow it – perhaps we should spend time internally reviewing the essential issues of each of our existing planning documents? They haven’t changed much over the years. Revenue, parking, traƯic, the connection from Downtown to Embarcadero, parcels to include in the sale/lease of the land, aesthetics, etc.
3. I suggest we extract the key elements from Plan Morro Bay, the 2018 DWSP, the 2024 Downtown Design District subcommittee recommendations, and the existing Waterfront Strategic Plan to provide the basis for reestablishing and updating the conceptual and necessary components for the development of this catalyst project.
4. If we do this work internally and quickly (subcommittee process and workshops) —the results will inform and help expedite completion of the “updated” Waterfront Strategic Plan proposed to begin in 2025.
5. GOAL: Complete all work as suggested above no later than the end of the 4th Quarter of 24/25.
We can do this!!!
Thanks for your consideration.
JeƯ and Kerry Heller
AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
PRIOR TO THE MEETING
AGENDA NO: 9a
MEETING DATE: October 8, 2024
AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
PRIOR TO THE MEETING
AGENDA NO: 9b
MEETING DATE: October 8, 2024
1 Heather Goodwin
From: Sharon Iranpour
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 12:59 PM
To: Heather Goodwin
Subject: Sea Otter Savvy Grant Application
[You don't oŌen get email from . Learn why this is important at hƩps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdenƟficaƟon ]
CAUTION: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening aƩachments.
Good aŌernoon, Heather,
I am a Morro Bay resident and a volunteer for Sea OƩer Savvy, serving as the Community Science Team Leader for the team of volunteers that collects data on the Morro Bay sea oƩers.
We have also become community ambassadors.
Once a week, we set up a spoƫng scope for a scan event where the sea oƩers raŌ up, to monitor their numbers and their behavior. We find ourselves inundated with quesƟons, not just about the oƩers, but where to go in town, where to eat and shop, and what acƟviƟes are planned. In two hours, we might talk to 20-30 people.
We found it necessary to add a third person to each scan to answer quesƟons, to educate, and to serve as ambassadors for Morro Bay. People are drawn here because there is no other place in the world to have this close up viewing opportunity in a natural environment and many come to Morro Bay specifically to see them.
Morro Bay sea oƩer photos are everywhere, in ads, in local publicaƟons, in tourist informaƟon. The local Sea OƩer Savvy volunteers are not only educated regarding the sea oƩers, but are people strongly interested in represenƟng our town as a friendly place, a great town to visit again and again.
I personally hope that local government could come to understand that support for our organizaƟon is good for us and good for Morro Bay as well.
Sincerely,
Sharon Iranpour
1 Heather Goodwin
From: Stephanie J Sherman
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 4:24 AM
To: Council
Subject: Support for Morro Bay in Bloom
[Some people who received this message don't oŌen get email from . Learn why this is important at hƩps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdenƟficaƟon ] CAUTION: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening aƩachments.
One of the best parts of being a Morro Bay in Bloom volunteer, is having people (both residents and visitors) stop to thank us for our work and to compliment us on how lovely Morro Bay is with all of the lovely plants and flowers. Since my volunteer gardens are in north Morro Bay, many of the people who stop to visit us, are especially complementary that the City of Morro Bay is supporƟng this work in their neighborhoods! While all of the work is done by volunteers, supplies, equipment, and plants, are not free. Please conƟnue supporƟng Morro Bay in Bloom by approving their grant request. Thank you.
Stephanie Sherman, north Morro Bay resident and Morro Bay in Bloom volunteer. 1 Heather Goodwin
From: Ed
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2024 11:19 AM
To: Council
Subject: Morro Bay in Bloom’s funding grant
[Some people who received this message don't oŌen get email from . Learn why this is important at hƩps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdenƟficaƟon ]
CAUTION: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening aƩachments.
Dear Council Members,
Please consider the full funding of Morro Bay in Bloom’s (MBIB) grant request. I have worked with MBIB from its incepƟon as a volunteer doing work all around the City. The funds they receive go mainly back to the City in the form of expenditures on plants, ferƟlizer, and landscaping materials.
MBIB conƟnues to save the City maintenance dollars with its army of volunteers doing work that frees City personnel for other tasks.
Thank you, Ed Boies
1 Heather Goodwin
From: Tim
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 11:39 AM
To: Council
Subject: Morro Bay in Bloom's grant request
[Some people who received this message don't oŌen get email from . Learn why this is important at hƩps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdenƟficaƟon ] CAUTION: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening aƩachments.
Good morning all,
Puƫng my two cents in about our city’s annual grant funding decision at this week’s city council meeƟng. In return, I’m asking for much more than two cents from you.
Given the many hours of volunteer hours MBIB contributes to our town every year, I’m hoping, and trusƟng, that you will fully fund MBIB’s grant request for the upcoming year.
Thanks
Tim Crowley
(Undercover Bloomie for more than 10 years)
1 Heather Goodwin
From: Rebecca Presley
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 10:10 AM
To: Council
Subject: Grant Funding for Morro Bay in Bloom
[Some people who received this message don't oŌen get email from . Learn why this is important at hƩps://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdenƟficaƟon ]
CAUTION: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening aƩachments.
As a member of our team of volunteer gardeners, I respecƞully request your conƟnued funding for Morro Bay in Bloom.
The ongoing work accomplished by dedicated volunteers is recognized and celebrated by members of our community.
Residents and visitors alike stop and thank us for “keeping Morro Bay beauƟful”.
That work is made possible through
this essenƟal grant funding. Thank you for your conƟnued support.
Becky Presley
Sent from my iPhone
AGENDA CORRESPONDENCE
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY THE
CITY COUNCIL FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
PRIOR TO THE MEETING
AGENDA NO: 9c
MEETING DATE: October 8, 2024
2 studios in town, and wonderful outdoor activities from hiking, to biking, kayaking, sailing, surfing etc. (And not enough doctors, housing or money to pave streets and fix storm drains, but that’s another meeting.) Good luck with your deliberations!
Susan Stewart
Morro Bay 18 year business owner, and resident, 1988-2021
October 4, 2024
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Morro Bay
595 Harbor Street
Morro Bay, CA 93442
Re: Agenda Item No: 9.c
Market Plaza RFP
Thank you, City Council and staff, for providing the opportunity to publicly review and comment on the process for completing the Market Plaza project. And, special thank you to Director Singewald and City Manager Kimball for noting the significant economic advantages of this project, its priority in the many adopted city planning documents, and the admonition that we plan the parking lots, existing buildings, Centennial Plaza, and the adjacent city rights of way in a comprehensive way. The City and community and community have sacrificed long term tenancy opportunities in this area so that we can plan a facility that will truly connect and complement the downtown and waterfront.
Sorry that I cannot be at the meeting in person, so I offer the following comments wearing my “resident” hat, and not as a Chamber or CFAC representative. As a professional planner and development consultant, I have 45 years of public sector and private sector experience on projects just like this as a public agency redevelopment director, as a redevelopment consultant to cities and counties throughout California, and as a developer’s rep for such projects. The comments below relate as much to successful projects that I have worked on as well as opportunities that were lost.
First as to parking. Like other projects in California, the City seeks to convert public parking areas into a mixed-use project. Some of the parking in this area was developed or acquired with fees paid by developers in lieu of onsite parking for their developments on the water side of the Embarcadero. In lieu parking fees have been paid and tenants have come to expect and rely on city owned and maintained parking for their parking needs (not really by choice but by Coastal Commission/LCP mandate). Some leaseholders have contracts to lease parking spaces. The city should have a clear understanding of the quantity of these obligations so that they can communicate how the city will satisfy them. This requirement can be met in many lower cost ways, including converting on-street parallel parking to diagonal parking, acquisition of other offsite surface lots, and development of additional parking in vacated portions of Market Street. Changing to diagonal parking on Harbor and Pacific, for example, could add 20-30 spaces at a cost of $250,000; providing an equal number of spaces in an onsite parking structure would cost $1.5M to $2.5M. The city also has $250,000-$300,000 of in lieu parking funds that have been collected from area developers that can be used. To achieve the greatest amount of synergy between downtown and the Embarcadero a significant portion of the parking and a main project entrance should be in the upper area around Market Street.
Which parcels? The RFP should cover the 781-785 Market Street building, the upper parking lot, Market Street from Morro Bay Blvd to Pacific, Centennial Plaza and the lower parking lot. The staff has rightfully noted that “…this is a critical opportunity area to revitalize the Embarcadero, link the downtown and waterfront, develop the Centennial Parkway, and enhance City revenue….The location of these parcels at the end of Morro Bay Boulevard … under City ownership makes the site unique and attractive to developers. The size of the site also allows for a large enough project to help pay for the development of Centennial Parkway.” Piecemealing this into smaller development pieces will NOT result in “more creative” development proposals and will only perpetuate the existing interim parking and short-term tenant arrangements. Piecemealing this was not recommended by the community as it developed the DWSP, EDSP and other waterfront plans. The City’s own design regulations will ensure that the final structure(s) will be attractive and functional. IF the City Council agrees to piecemeal the parcels in the RFP, DO NOT expect any additional community benefits like Centennial Plaza or enhanced parking, or anything other than “more of the same”.
Be reasonable and keep your eyes on the prize. Public agency property owners often get decision paralysis because they cannot conceptualize nor appreciate the tradeoffs of having developers pay for “extras” and “community benefits” while still getting top dollar for their properties. “Extras” come out of the lease or purchase price that a developer can pay (it’s a zero-sum game). Putting too many ornaments on the ‘tree’ will simply make if fall over (again). The city is sitting on a $3.5M asset that is currently generating $62,600 in revenue (a 1.7% return with no TOT or sales taxes), considering the rents paid by interim tenants and the free parking. As a quality full service/meeting lodging facility (what won’t compete with the city’s limited-service lodging facilities) it has the promise of returning $500,000 to $750,000 in TOT, $85,000 per year is associated sales taxes, $85,000 in Tidelands percentage rent lease revenues, $50,000 per year in property tax and motor vehicle in lieu taxes, and $350,000 to $450,000 in rent or an annualized purchase price. As a completed redevelopment project it will return $1,070,000 per year (30.6%) to the city for that same $3.5M asset.
To sell or to lease? This is an important decision. Selling the property to the developer makes project financing immensely more feasible, and the city could re-deploy the proceeds of the sale to other projects like acquiring surface lots along the Embarcadero to catalyze the next “Market Plaza” project that will generate another 30.6% annual return. Leasing isn’t always the best economic option for the city.
Get help and pave the way. Developers will commit capital if they believe that they can connect the dots to completion in a predictable way and that there are no “trap doors” along the way.
Certainty and predictability=success. There are good consultants out there who have been to this rodeo many times and the city should get their help to structure a feasible deal that works best for the community. The success of your RFP will probably largely depend on whether developers believe that the city is now ready, willing and able to make a deal. Having the right consultants in place, having realistic expectations, and being ready speaks volumes to developers as to whether or not the city is serious about finishing a real estate transaction. Consider that developers will be skeptical about why the previous deals didn’t close. Don’t assume that City staff or council members have the experience, skill set or time necessary to complete this project. “Consultant” is not a dirty word when they are used correctly and effectively.