“Our mission is to maintain the character of our “small town” community while striking an appropriate balance between economic development and preservation of our quality of life. We help create a dynamic and vital City by providing quality, cost-effective municipalservices and by forming partnerships with residents and organizations in the constant pursuit of excellence.”
Page Item STANDING AGENDA ITEMS
1. Call to Order and Flag Salute
2. Roll call
3. Special Presentation:
a. Proclamation: Read Across Siskiyou
4. Public Comment:
This time is set aside for citizens to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an agenda item noted on the regular agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment.
Each speaker is allocated three (3) minutes to speak. Speakers may not cede their time. Comments should be limited to matters within the jurisdiction of the City. Council discussion or action cannot be taken on items not listed on the agenda other than to receive comments. If you have documents to present to members of Council, please provide a minimum of seven (7) copies to the Deputy City Clerk. Email Comments may be submitted to the City Clerk’s Office ([email protected]). Items received no later than 12:00 pm on the day of the meeting will be provided to the City Council prior to the meeting. These items will NOT be read into the record.
5. Council and Staff Comments
6. Committee Updates:
a) Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee
b) Library Tax Advisory Committee
c) Beautification Committee
d) Active Transportation Committee
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 12, 2024, 5:30 p.m.
Mt. Shasta City Park Upper Lodge, 1315 Nixon Rd. Mt. Shasta, CA The meeting can also be viewed online at the
following link:
MountShasta.22Ave.tv
For the safety of our staff, the council, and public, we are no longer allowing members of the audience to carry large bags, backpacks, or other items outside of small personal items such as purses or satchels. Only service animals are allowed inside council chambers; nonservice pets are not allowed under any circumstances. Violators will be asked to remove the bag and/or animal, and refusal to do so will be cause for removal from the meeting.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 1 Mt. Shasta Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, November 12, 2024
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
All Resolutions and Ordinances on this agenda, or added hereto, shall be introduced or adopted, as applicable, by title only, and the full reading thereof is hereby waived. a. Approval of Minutes: October 28, 2024
b. Approval of Disbursements: Accounts Payable: 10/23 and 11/5/2024; Total Gross Payroll and Taxes: For Period Ending 10/27/2024
c. Second Reading and Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Mt Shasta Municipal Code Chapter 12.34 to Clarify Provisions Related to Sidewalk Dining, CCO-24-XX
CDBG-CV2-3-00106 Subsistence Payment Program and 20-CDBG-CV2-3-00094 Food Assistance Payment Program
Background: Siskiyou Economic Development Council and Great Northern Services, both subrecipients, provided general administration and implementation services to Mt. Shasta as the administrative representative for CDBG-CV funding for a Siskiyou County subsistence payment program and food assistance program for low to moderate income individuals. Attached is a narrative that describes the outcome of the programs. This public hearing is a required meeting to discuss the grant program, highlight successes, challenges and future needs for future grant applications.
Report By: Malisa Dodd, Finance Director
Recommended Council Action: Open a public hearing to give citizens an opportunity to make their comments known regarding the eligible activities the City has completed during the 20-CDBG-CV2-3- 00106 Subsistence Payment Program and 20-CDBG-CV2-3-00094 Food Assistance Payment Program.
18, Zoning) adding Chapter 18.50 Objective Design Standards.
Background: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on October 15, 2024, and unanimously adopted Resolution PC 2024-02 recommending the City Council amend the Mt Shasta Municipal Code adding Chapter 18.50 Objective Design Standards for review of multi-family housing.
Report By: Jeff Mitchem, Planning Director
Recommended Council Action: Approve first reading, by title only, an Ordinance to amend the Mt Shasta Municipal Code adding Chapter 18.60 Objective Design Standards to Title 18, Zoning, with findings of CEQA Categorical Exemption – “Common Sense” Sect. 15061(b)(3).
Finance Plan (IFP)
Background: On September 11, 2023, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to initiate the establishment of the City of Mount Shasta Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (Mount Shasta EIFD) and establish the Mount Shasta EIFD Public Financing Authority (PFA) as the governing body.
Subsequently, on May 22, 2024, the PFA ordered the preparation of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) as required by the EIFD Law (California Government Code Section 53398.50 through 53398.88).
The IFP is the legal document describing the EIFD, and it is to be adopted by the City Council and PFA to guide the use of incremental tax revenues over the life of the EIFD. Public notices were mailed, information was posted on a dedicated website (https://www.mtshastaca.gov/public-finance-authority/page/enhanced-infrastructure-financing-district-eifd), and notices were also published in the newspaper, as required by law, to inform property owners and residents.
Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Approve the Resolution in Support of the adoption of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) for the Formation of the Mount Shasta Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and the Allocation of Property Tax Increment within the Mount Shasta EIFD. Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 2 5-19
20-26
27-94
95-171
Mt. Shasta Regular City Council Meeting Agenda
Tuesday November 12, 2024
Background: The previous agreement with the Siskiyou Humane Society has expired and the Executive Director requested changes to the contract to move to a flat fee funding model for the care and feeding of stray and nuisance animals. The Society will then manage reunification and rehoming as needed for animals and their owners.
Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff respectfully requests the City Council adopt Resolution CCR-24-XX, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta appropriating funds from the General Fund not to exceed $10,000 to continue to utilize the services of the Siskiyou Humane Society.
Background: A few weeks ago, the Accounting Staff attended a software demonstration on the differences between the Project Management module and the Accounts Receivable and Purchase Order modules. After the demonstration and discussion about our needs for grant reporting and potential other billing opportunities, staff agreed that this change would work best in the new system.
Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff respectfully requests the City Council adopt Resolution CCR-24-XX, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta appropriating funds from the General Fund not to exceed $2,765 for the exchange of the Project Management Subscription in the amount of $3,465 to the Accounts Receivable and Purchase Order Subscriptions.
CITY COUNCIL/STAFF REPORTING PERIOD
13. Reports on Outside Meetings
14. Future Agenda Items and Meetings (Appearing on the agenda within 60-90 days):
a. Discussion and Possible Action: Process of and Cost Recovery for Snow Removal in the Downtown – 11/25/2024
b. Discussion and Possible Action: Purchase of Unpaved Parcels at 415 N. Chestnut – 11/25/2024 c. Certification of Election Results and Swearing in of Councilmembers – 12/9/2024 d. Beautification Committee Presentation to Council – TBD e. Survey of Washington Avenue – TBD
f. Discussion and Possible Action: Rental, Lease, or Purchase of Lot Located at the northwest corner of Alma and N. Mt. Shasta Blvd – TBD
Future Agenda Items Over 90 Days: None
15. Adjourn
I, Kathryn Joyce, declare under penalty of perjury that this agenda has been posted at least 72 hours in advance at the Mt.
Shasta City Hall, 305 N. Mt. Shasta Blvd, Mt. Shasta, CA, in the glass case and on the City website at www.mtshastaca.gov.
Agendas and packets shall be made available at least 72 hours in advance of regular meetings and 24 hours in advance of special meetings on the City’s web site. Any writings or documents pertaining to an open session item provided to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours prior to the meeting shall be made available on the City’s web site www.mtshastaca.gov.
Availability of Public Records: All public records related to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection at City Hall located at 305 North Mt. Shasta Blvd.
The City of Mt. Shasta does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability in employment or provision of services. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance, a disability-related modification or accommodation, agenda materials in an alternative format, or auxiliary aids to participate in this meeting, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at 530-326-7516 or [email protected] as soon as possible.
Providing at least 72 hours’ notice will help ensure that reasonable arrangements can be made.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 3 172-179
180-191
Siskiyou County
PROCLAMATION of the 17th ANNUAL “READ ACROSS SISKIYOU” event Sponsored By First 5 Siskiyou Children and Families Commission WHEREAS, the ultimate goal of the First 5 Siskiyou Children and Families Commission is that all of Siskiyou’s children from prenatal through 5 years of age will be healthy, ready to learn, and supported in safe, nurturing families and communities; and WHEREAS, children in Siskiyou County from prenatal through 5 years of age have a suc-cessful start in life through daily reading with supportive and nurturing families, caregivers, educators and community leaders; and
WHEREAS, early literacy is the foundation for academic, social emotional, and economic success; and
WHEREAS, First 5 Siskiyou, in partnership with Siskiyou County Library, dedicates one day each year to promote early literacy by providing the same titled book to be read by guest readers to children in various preschools, kindergartens, child care settings, libraries and online events throughout Siskiyou County on the same day and provide each child with a copy of that book to take home.
THEREFORE, the City of Mt. Shasta hereby proclaims November 13, 2024 as the 17th anniversary of “Read Across Siskiyou” and be it that this body enthusiastically endors-es daily reading, singing and playing with children as a critical foundation for healthy devel-opment and life long success.
Signed _______________________________ Date:__________________ John Stackfleth, Mayor, City of Mt. Shasta
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 4 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting DRAFT Minutes
Monday, October 28, 2024; 5:30 p.m.
City Park Upper Lodge, 1315 Nixon Road, Mt. Shasta
“Our mission is to maintain the character of our “small town” community while striking an appropriate balance between economic development and preservation of our quality of life. We help create a dynamic and vital City by providing quality, cost-effective municipal services and by forming partnerships with residents and organizations in the constant pursuit of excellence.”
STANDING AGENDA ITEMS
1. Call to Order and Flag Salute: At the hour of 5:30 p.m. Mayor Stackfleth called the meeting to order and led the audience in the flag salute.
2. Roll Call:
Council Members Present: Stackfleth, Collings, Redmond, Stearns Council Members Absent: Clure
3. Special Presentation: None
4. Public Comment:
Tracy Costello – Comments pertaining to a dial-a-ride program, daylighting of Castle Creek, one-way streets, parking, potholes, and in support of Measure B.
5. Council and Staff Comments:
Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Update on The Landing, meeting with Kosmont and Pinsonneault Holdings, comments regarding possible future development and technical assistance grants.
Walter Moore, Acting Chief of Police – Comments regarding staffing and Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director – Comments regarding testing for lead in laterals.
Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Update on the Wastewater Treatment Plant.
Clarifying questions from Council.
John Stackfleth, Mayor – Review of the League of Local Agencies meeting, pension meeting.
Clarifying questions from Council and discussion.
John Stackfleth, Mayor – Comments regarding Springbrook software, and review of downtown ad hoc committee meeting regarding one-ways and daylighting.
6. Committee Updates: No committee updates.
a) Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee
b) Library Tax Advisory Committee
c) Beautification Committee
d) Active Transportation Committee
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 5 City of Mt. Shasta Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Monday, October 28, 2024
7. Consent Agenda:
COUNCIL ACTION: Approved the following Consent Agenda items. All Resolutions and Ordinances on this agenda, or added hereto, shall be introduced or adopted, as applicable, by title only, and the full reading thereof is hereby waived.
a. Approval of Minutes: October 14, 2024
b. Approval of Disbursements: Accounts Payable:10/17/2024; Total Gross Payroll and Taxes: For Period Ending 10/13/2024
c. Monthly Investment Report
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve items a-c
MOTION TO APPROVE: Redmond
SECOND: Collings
AYES: Stackfleth, Collings, Stearns, Redmond
NOES: None
ABSENT: Clure
ABSTAIN: None
8. Public Hearing: First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Mt Shasta Municipal Code Chapter 12.34 to Clarify Provisions Related to Sidewalk Dining
Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Review of proposed amendment to the Municipal Code related to outdoor dining.
Clarifying questions from Council.
A non-substantive amendment was suggested by Councilmember Stearns and agreed to by Council.
Public Hearing Open: 6:29 p.m.
Public Hearing Closed: 6:30 p.m.
COUNCIL ACTION: Approve the first reading of the proposed Ordinance as amended, by title only, and move it to a second reading and adoption.
MOTION: Stearns
SECOND: Redmond
AYES: Stackfleth, Redmond, Collings, Stearns
NOES: None
ABSENT: Clure
ABSTAIN: None
9. Discussion and Possible Action: Discussion of Potential Purchase of Unpaved Parcels at 415 N. Chestnut Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Review of staff report, various steps in the process including ground testing and a property appraisal. Reviewed future use of the property, estimated value, and cost of cleanup. Review of existing lease through February 2025.
Clarifying questions from Council.
Tom Hesseldenz – Comments regarding the land acquisition process, opportunity cost and grants. Comments in support of further negotiations and research.
Clarifying questions from Council.
Wendy Warnick – Questions about liability from contamination.
COUNCIL ACTION: Table the item to the second Council meeting in November.
MOTION: Redmond
SECOND: Stearns
AYES: Stackfleth, Redmond, Collings, Stearns
NOES: None
ABSENT: Clure
ABSTAIN: None
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 6 City of Mt. Shasta Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Monday, October 28, 2024
10. Discussion and Possible Action: Process of and Cost Recovery for Snow Removal in the Downtown Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director – Review of staff report, proposed snow removal options. Comments about charges and basis of fees.
Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Comments regarding discussion with the City Attorney.
Clarifying questions from Council and discussion about existing Ordinance..
COUNCIL ACTION: Table the item until the second meeting in November or whenever staff is prepared to bring it back to Council.
MOTION: Redmond
SECOND: Stearns
AYES: Stackfleth, Redmond, Collings, Stearns
NOES: None
ABSENT: Clure
ABSTAIN: None
11. Reports on Outside Meetings: None
12. Future Agenda Items (Appearing on the agenda within 60-90 days):
COUNCIL ACTION: Reviewed items a through f. No changes or additions. a. Adoption of the Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District – 11/12/2024 b. Objective Design Standards – 11/12/2024
c. Certification of Election Results and Swearing in of Councilmembers – 12/9/2024 d. Beautification Committee Presentation to Council – TBD e. Survey of Washington Avenue – TBD
f. Discussion and Possible Action: Rental, Lease, or Purchase of Lot Located at the northwest corner of Alma and N. Mt. Shasta Blvd – TBD
Future Agenda Items Over 90 Days:
13. Adjourn: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:24 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted By: Kathryn M. Joyce, Administrative Assistant/Deputy City Clerk Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 7 City Council Agenda Item #7b
Staff Report
Meeting Date: November 12, 2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Malisa Dodd, Finance Director
Subject: Approval of Warrants and Payroll
Recommendation:
Staff requests the Mayor and City Council Approve warrants paid including payroll benefits and withholding, and payroll distribution, in the amount of $355,465.35.
Background & Summary:
Approval of Check Numbers 52985-53067 $ 201,201.10
Total Payroll Distribution $ 90,584.09
Total EFTPS – CalPERS, Nationwide, child support $ 23,261.87 Total Payroll EFTPS Taxes $ 40,418.29
$ 355,465.35
Financial Impact:
Expenditures are consistent with the Budget that the City Council has adopted.
Attachments:
1.) Check Registers – 10/23/2024, 11/5/2024
2.) ACH Payroll Distribution – 10/31/2024
3.) EFTPS Reports – Payroll/CalPERS – 10/31/2024
Regular
x Consent
Closed
Presentation
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 8 Accounts Payable
User:
Printed:
[email protected]
11/6/2024 9:46 AM
Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number
Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
52985 13222 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 10/23/2024 608.00 52986 10229 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 10/23/2024 238.27
52987 10338 APEX TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 10/23/2024 745.00 52988 10402 AT&T MOBILITY FIRSTNET 10/23/2024 1,903.05
52989 10429 AXON ENTERPRISE INC 10/23/2024 14,774.83
52990 11156 YOLANDE DIEDRE BELL 10/23/2024 320.80
52991 11252 BLUE STAR GAS 10/23/2024 2.14
52992 300138 BROOKS COMPLETE AUTO REPAIR 10/23/2024 1,045.43 52993 12300 CASH 10/23/2024 86.00
52994 12620 COLLEGE OF THE SISKIYOUS 10/23/2024 324.00
52995 12269 COMCAST 10/23/2024 414.72
52996 13251 DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS 10/23/2024 7,440.00 52997 13224 DRY CREEK LANDFILL INC 10/23/2024 1,427.13
52998 14880 FAILSAFE TESTING LLC 10/23/2024 453.88
52999 15030 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC. #1423 10/23/2024 426.67 53000 16180 GREAT NORTHERN CORPORATION 10/23/2024 6,603.77 53001 300135 Gregory and Barbara Juell 10/23/2024 2,553.88 53002 20063 KENNYS LOCK SHOP 10/23/2024 1,263.63
53003 22149 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN INC MIG10/23/2024 7,325.92 53004 22343 MT. SHASTA POINT S TIRE & AUTO 10/23/2024 30.00 53005 23054 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL INC 10/23/2024 10,455.54 53006 11140 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC 10/23/2024 823.30 53007 25020 PACE ENGINEERING INC 10/23/2024 2,928.00
53008 25080 PACIFIC POWER & LIGHT 10/23/2024 11,706.00
53009 300137 PORAC 10/23/2024 792.00
53010 26096 RAFTELIS 10/23/2024 105.00
53011 27040 RAY-MAC MECHANICAL INC 10/23/2024 215.00
53012 27154 RYAN VALUATION SERVICES 10/23/2024 1,600.00 53013 28340 SISKIYOU COUNTY AUDITOR 10/23/2024 1,120.00 53014 28378 SISKIYOU COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES10/23/2024 613.50 53015 28460 SISKIYOU COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 10/23/2024 189.00 53016 28640 SOUSA READY MIX LLC 10/23/2024 707.10
53017 300136 Consortium South Bay Regional Public Safety Training 10/23/2024 1,011.00 53018 28680 SPORTSMEN'S DEN INC 10/23/2024 161.20
53019 28740 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 10/23/2024 363.00 53020 28815 STERLING HEALTH ADMINISTRATION 10/23/2024 466.67 53021 29011 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 137 10/23/2024 2,019.16
53022 15230 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC 10/23/2024 169.40
53023 30004 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 10/23/2024 317.44 53024 30007 USA BLUE BOOK 10/23/2024 216.85
53025 31050 VERIZON CONNECT FLEET USA LLC 10/23/2024 35.00 53026 300087 ALHAMBRA 11/05/2024 42.74
53027 10338 APEX TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 11/05/2024 9,903.51 53028 11146 BAXTER AUTO PARTS 11/05/2024 233.76
53029 11156 YOLANDE DIEDRE BELL 11/05/2024 200.30
53030 11359 ALAN BROWNELL 11/05/2024 900.00
53031 12213 CAL-ORE COMMUNICATIONS 11/05/2024 1,583.56
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (11/6/2024 9:46 AM) Page 1 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 9 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Check Amount
53032 12640 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT INSUR 11/05/2024 299.22 53033 12269 COMCAST 11/05/2024 414.72
53034 13071 DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS 11/05/2024 40,605.00
53035 14140 DON ERICKSON OIL INC 11/05/2024 245.43
53036 13224 DRY CREEK LANDFILL INC 11/05/2024 2,365.21
53037 15031 FERGUSON WATERWORKS FEI #3011 11/05/2024 3,977.50 53038 34040 GOLD NUGGET PRINTING 11/05/2024 574.32
53039 300139 The Good Year Tire & Rubber Company 11/05/2024 1,470.22 53040 18082 MUNICIPAL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF 11/05/2024 200.00 53041 18063 INTERSTATE BATTERY 11/05/2024 429.47
53042 20003 JONES CARPET CLEANING & JANITORIAL LLC 11/05/2024 2,319.57 53043 300107 Laboratory Corporation of American Holdings11/05/2024 27.00 53044 21169 PIERCE LOBBAN 11/05/2024 117.31
53045 22071 MENDES SUPPLY COMPANY 11/05/2024 2,098.46
53046 22133 MEYERS POLICE K-9 TRAINING LLC 11/05/2024 700.00 53047 300141 Napa Auto of Mt Shasta 11/05/2024 311.33
53048 23023 NATIVE GROUNDS NURSERY AND LANDSCAPE INC 11/05/2024 220.00 53049 23079 NOLL & TAM ARCHITECTS 11/05/2024 2,791.50
53050 24000 OFFICE DEPOT 11/05/2024 923.81
53051 24033 OREILLY AUTOMOTIVE INC 11/05/2024 88.98
53052 11140 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES LLC 11/05/2024 976.27 53053 25020 PACE ENGINEERING INC 11/05/2024 855.00
53054 25100 PAPE' MACHINERY INC 11/05/2024 131.18
53055 300143 Louise Pieper 11/05/2024 114.97
53056 25198 CHARLES W PILLON 11/05/2024 5,993.75
53057 25160 POSTMASTER 11/05/2024 2,000.00
53058 27000 RAMSHAW'S ACE HARDWARE INC 11/05/2024 113.02 53059 300140 J F Shea Construction Inc 11/05/2024 1,549.76 53060 28372 SISKIYOU COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 11/05/2024 20,740.58 53061 28560 SISKIYOU OPPORTUNITY CENTER 11/05/2024 887.50 53062 32060 SOLANOS INC 11/05/2024 2,298.60
53063 30014 U. S. BANK 11/05/2024 1,750.00
53064 30004 U.S. BANK EQUIPMENT FINANCE 11/05/2024 293.96 53065 31050 VERIZON CONNECT FLEET USA LLC 11/05/2024 199.45 53066 31031 VESTIS 11/05/2024 577.86
53067 34055 YREKA TRANSFER, LLC 11/05/2024 5,675.00
Report Total (83 checks): 201,201.10
AP Checks by Date - Summary by Check Number (11/6/2024 9:46 AM) Page 2 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 10 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 11 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 12 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 13 From: Tri Counties Bank
To: Malisa Dodd
Subject: Tri Counties Bank - ACH Payment Status Change Notification Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2024 3:05:55 PM
ACH Notification
Report Date/Time 10/30/24 15:05:16 PDT
This transaction has been successfully completed.
Transaction Number: ACH-01424817
ACH Company: City Mt Shasta
Company Entry Description: ACHTRANS
Payment Date: 10/31/2024
Total Credits: $90,584.09 (45)
Total Debits: $0.00 (0)
Status: Completed
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 14 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 15 CITY OF MT. SHASTA
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director
DATE: November 12, 2024
SUBJECT: Final Reading
Amendment - Mt Shasta Municipal Code Chapter 12.34
DESCRIPTION
Consideration of an Ordinance (Attachment A) amending Mt Shasta Municipal Code Chapter
12.34 to clarify provisions related to sidewalk dining.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Ordinance, with findings that the action does not meet the definition of a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), adding item (J) to Section 12.34.030 as follows:
Section 12.34.030 Administrative Permits. The following encroachment permits may be issued by the Director of Public Works, according to standards and procedures to be specified by him or her, and on such terms and conditions as he or she may deem appropriate for the protection of the public safety and convenience:
(J) Temporary encroachments requested by owners of food establishments for the placement of movable chairs and tables along establishment frontage only for sidewalk dining maintaining a minimum 4' clear path, subject to approval by the Director of Public Works.
A minimum distance of not less than four feet wide pedestrian travel aisle shall be maintained in the public right-of-way at all times between dining encroachments and any fixed sidewalk obstruction including, without limitation, curb lines, tree wells, street trees, fire hydrants, light poles, utility equipment boxes, newspaper racks and benches.
Additionally, all sidewalk dining areas shall be set back a minimum of five and one-half feet from the edge of the curb or as approved by the Public Works Director, where parking is available adjacent to said curb,
Sidewalk dining areas shall not intrude on pedestrian “clear zones” at corners, and thus shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from any crosswalk, driveway or alley. Sidewalk dining areas shall not interfere with curbs, ramps or driveways, as determined by the Public Works Director.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 16
BACKGROUND
On October 28, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing, considered the public record and directed non-substantive clarifications be made to the Encroachments onto City Property Ordinance related to pedestrian travel aisle requirements (ordinance text, paragraph two, sentence one).
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action fails to meet the two-part test for a “project” under CEQA. Though a discretionary act, adoption of the ordinance to permit tables and chairs on sidewalks as regulated constitutes activity not capable of causing a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment as the ordinance does not concentrate, nor shift property uses within the City of Mt Shasta.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance CCO-24-XX
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 17 ORDINANCE CCO-24-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MT SHASTA
AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 12.34
WHEREAS, in 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance CCO-96-03 regulating encroachments onto public property; and
WHEREAS, since that time, the City has experienced an increase in restaurant demand for additional outdoor seating; and
WHEREAS, the existing provisions in Chapter 12.34 lack specificity and clarity related to outdoor dining regulations; and
WHEREAS, this amendment explicitly conveys permission for outdoor dining while complying with accessibility law; and
WHEREAS, the draft amendments were released to the public for review on the City’s website and published in the Mt Shasta Herald on October 16, 2024; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2024, the City Council directed non-substantive clarifications be made to the Encroachments onto City Property Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, during its review, the City Council considered the public record, including the staff report, findings, and any written materials and testimony presented by the public during the hearing; and WHEREAS, to ensure public health and safety, the City Council does desire to enact the following regulations related to mobile food vending; and
WHEREAS, the action fails to meet the two-part test for a “project” under CEQA. Though a discretionary act, adoption of the ordinance to permit tables and chairs on sidewalks as regulated constitutes activity not capable of causing a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment as the ordinance does not concentrate, nor shift property uses within the City of Mt Shasta.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED that the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta does amend the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code Section 12.34.030 to read as follows:
Section 12.34.030 Administrative permits
(J) Temporary encroachments requested by owners of food establishments for the placement of movable chairs and tables along establishment frontage only for sidewalk dining maintaining a minimum 4' clear path, subject to approval by the Director of Public Works.
A minimum distance of not less than four feet wide pedestrian travel aisle shall be maintained in the public right-of-way at all times between dining encroachments and any fixed sidewalk obstruction including, without limitation, curb lines, tree wells, street trees, fire hydrants, light poles, utility equipment boxes, newspaper racks and benches. Additionally, all sidewalk dining areas shall be set back a minimum of five and one-half feet from the edge of the curb or as approved by the Public Works Director, where parking is available adjacent to said curb.
Sidewalk dining areas shall not intrude on pedestrian “clear zones” at corners, and thus shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from any crosswalk, driveway or alley. Sidewalk dining areas shall not interfere with curbs, ramps or driveways, as determined by the Public Works Director.The foregoing Ordinance was adopted at the regular meeting of the City Council of Mt Shasta held on this 28th day of October 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 18 ABSTAIN:
DATED:
ATTEST: CITY OF MT SHASTA
Kathryn M Joyce, Deputy City Clerk John Stackfleth, Mayor FORM APPROVED:
John Sullivan Kenny, City Attorney
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance CCO-24-XX was introduced at a regular meeting of the Mt Shasta City Council on the 28th day of October 2024, and was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council on the 12th day of November, 2024.
Kathryn M Joyce, Deputy City Clerk
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 19 310 Boles Street
Weed, CA 96094
(530) 938-4115
Fax (530) 938-1040
www.gnservices.org
Weaving a stronger community, together....
Access to Capital • Por�olio Management • Economic Development • Energy Assistance • Home Weatheriza�on Community Food Projects • Community Services • HIV/AIDS Case Management • Community Development CA Lic. # 629328
Closeout Report
Public Hearing Handouts
20-CDBG-CV 2/3-00094 & 20-CDBG-CV2-3-00106
Siskiyou County Supplemental Food Bank Assistance Program 20-CDBG-CV 2/3-00094
All 10 Siskiyou County jurisdic�ons combined their CDBG-CV 2/3 funding to ini�ate a Food Assistance Program for residents who were income qualified experiencing financial difficulty due to COVID. As instructed by HCD, no household or individual was turned away if they needed food.
There were three grants that provided funding for the Program. They were 20-CDBG-CV 2/3-00094 which is the focus of this report and supplied the majority of the funding, 20-CDBG-CV1-00049 and 20- CDG-CV2/3-00051 which supplied all of the funding in April 2023 and 13% of the funding (or 0.5% of the total funding) in May 2023.
The City of Mt. Shasta was the grant administrator for standard agreement 20-CDBG-CV 2/3-00094.
Siskiyou Economic Development Council as a subrecipient performed general administra�on for the grant. Great Northern Services (GNS), subrecipient, distributed fresh produce and supplemental protein such as eggs and frozen meat to 11 food distribu�on sites throughout Siskiyou County in alternate months of the USDA Commodi�es Emergency Food Assistance Program (EFAP). The EFAP program offers shelf stable commodity type foods every other month to 19 distribu�on sites. Therefore the program allowed 11 sites to have food every month for 20 months during the height of the pandemic.
As stated above, the program ran for 20 consecu�ve months from January 2022 through August 2023.
There were enough funds remaining that allowed GNS to distribute fresh protein and produce in April and May 2024 during the same distribu�on days as EFAP to the same 11 food distribu�on sites.
The 11 sites where food distribu�on took place served each of the 10 jurisdic�on loca�ons who were party to the MOU and surrounding areas.
• Dorris Lions Club, Dorris (Macdoel and other small communi�es in Bute Valley) • Dunsmuir Community Resource Center, Dunsmuir
• Valley Oaks Senior Center, Greenview (Etna, Fort Jones, Greenview, Quartz Valley, Klamath River communi�es, Salmon River, Cecilville, Horse Creek, Somes Bar and Seiad Valley) • Happy Camp Community Ac�on Center, Happy Camp (Klamath River communi�es, Salmon River, Cecilville, Horse Creek, Somes Bar and Seiad Valley)
• Hornbrook Community Bible Church, Hornbrook (Communi�es north and east of Yreka) Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 20 Great Northern Services
310 Boles Street • Weed, CA 96094 • (530) 938-4115 • Fax (530) 938-1040 • www.gnservices.org CA Lic. # 629328
• McCloud American Legion, McCloud
• Montague Methodist Church, Montague (Grenada, Gazelle, Shasta Valley communi�es) • Mt. Shasta Community Resource Center, Mt. Shasta
• TEACH, Tulelake (Surrounding communi�es)
• GNS, Weed (Grenada, Gazelle, Big Springs, Shasta Valley communi�es) • Yreka Community Resource Center, Yreka (Klamath River communi�es, Salmon River, Cecilville, Horse Creek, Somes Bar and Seiad Valley, Grenada, Gazelle, Big Springs, Shasta Valley communi�es)
The table below represents the assistance provided by all three CDBG-CV grants which served 2822 households with 6255 people broken down by distribu�on site. This includes households that may have atended mul�ple distribu�on sites. It also has the total number of �mes households and people received assistance.
$ Contributed6 ## Of HH1 # of People1
TTL # HH
Served2
TTL # of PPL
Served2
Dorris
$54,000
$26,8863 216 558 1,232 2,959
Dunsmuir $48,000 262 506 989 1,862
Scott Valley5
$32,000
$32,000
$1,0004 225 527 1,058 2,331
Happy Camp4 $77,000 323 635 1,203 2,299
Hornbrook4 $34,000 157 285 515 922
McCloud4 $39,000 176 327 792 1,345
Montague $33,000 183 371 708 1,317
Mt. Shasta $37,000 256 416 563 870
Tulelake $59,000 169 558 1,376 4,684
Weed $43,000 157 352 427 904
Yreka $88,000 698 1,720 1,540 3,567
TTL
$578,00000
$601,272.003 2,822 6,255 9,171 20,101 1 A household/people was considered unique for each site attended. A household may have multiple entries if they attended multiple distribution sites. 2 This represents the total number of times a household/people in the household received assistance.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 21 Great Northern Services
310 Boles Street • Weed, CA 96094 • (530) 938-4115 • Fax (530) 938-1040 • www.gnservices.org CA Lic. # 629328
3 Dorris contributed $26,886 from their 20-CDBG-CV1-00049 and 20-CDG-CV2/3-00051 grants. $54,0000 was budgeted for this grant.
4 In the County’s jurisdiction
5 This includes Etna, Fort Jones and County jurisdictions 6 Budget submitted for Activity funding only. Includes wages for GNS and Resource Center staff, mileage and food costs.
For purposes of this closeout report those assisted solely in April 2023 with Dorris’ 20-CDBG-CV1-00049 and 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00051 standard agreements were removed so as not to double count those that were included in the 20-CDBG-CV1-00049 and 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00051 closeout reports. This report does include those individuals assisted in May 2023 as the overall percentage of funding provided by Dorris was small.
For those that were assisted in April and May 2024, they were categorically eligible for the program as they self-cer�fy under the EFAP program.
There were 13 households with 33 people who self-reported to be over income and were not counted in the Comple�on Report form. These people were not denied food as directed by HCD.
A total of 6,171 people were provided fresh and frozen protein and produce with standard agreement 20-CDBG-CV 2/3-00094.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 22 Great Northern Services
310 Boles Street • Weed, CA 96094 • (530) 938-4115 • Fax (530) 938-1040 • www.gnservices.org CA Lic. # 629328
Siskiyou County COVID-19 Subsistence Payment Program
20-CDBG-CV2-3-00106
The total CDBG-CV2/3 Subsistence Payment Program assisted households for two years with Mt. Shasta’s standard agreement 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 star�ng in January 2022 and ending in May 2023 and then client payments con�nued with Dunsmuir’s standard agreement 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00050 star�ng in June 2023 and ending in December 2023. Each standard agreement pulled CDBG-CV2/3 funding from all 10 Siskiyou County jurisdic�ons to ensure efficiency in providing services to struggling households who were experiencing financial difficul�es due to COVID-19. The program assisted with no more than three consecu�ve months of payments to eligible households for a maximum of $3,000 for mortgage payments, rent (beginning June 2022) and u�lity payments such as water/sewer, broadband services, power, propane and/or hea�ng fuel such as diesel or kerosene.
Siskiyou Economic Development, subrecipient to Mt. Shasta and Dunsmuir, performed general administra�on.
Great Northern Services (GNS), subrecipient to Mt. Shasta and Dunsmuir, performed client services including marke�ng and outreach, applica�on development and distribu�on, client assistance, processing applica�ons, applica�on approval or denial, client data management and client payment management. GNS worked with the 9 Community Resource Centers as their subrecipients throughout the county. Because Siskiyou County is the 5th largest county in California and has many remote rural communi�es, GNS relies heavily on the resources centers to assist with this and many other programs.
While the resource centers distribute applica�ons and assist clients in comple�ng the applica�ons and sending, when necessary, the applica�ons to GNS, it’s GNS’ responsibility to process and approve or deny services.
Mt. Shasta processed and made client payments and were a subrecipient to Dunsmuir to provide those services from June to December 2023
Over the 10 jurisdic�ons there were 653 households with 1641 people served at least one �me. A total of 2410 payments were made for a total of $1,300,078.76.
Total # Times
HH’s Served
TTL $ Amount of
Assistance
Unique HH’s
Served
Unique People
Served
Dorris 88 $31,266.06 21 44
Dunsmuir 125 $75,340.76 35 78
Etna 20 $13,705.68 9 24
Ft. Jones 84 $46,504.84 24 58
Montague 98 $46,798.31 24 53
Mt. Shasta 245 $129,385.97 59 120
Tulelake 341 $101,940.36 75 260
Weed 397 $259,886.85 110 280
Yreka 614 $357,566.11 181 457
County 398 $237,683.82 115 267
TTL 2410 $1,300,078.76 653 1641
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 23 Great Northern Services
310 Boles Street • Weed, CA 96094 • (530) 938-4115 • Fax (530) 938-1040 • www.gnservices.org CA Lic. # 629328
During the Mt. Shasta client services period there were 514 households with 1267 people served at least one �me for a total of 1886 payments for $ 991,839.19.
During the Dunsmuir client services period there were 139 households with 374 people served at least one time for a total of 524 payments for $308,239.57.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 24 No�ce of Public Mee�ng on the Status of CDBG Funded Ac�vi�es NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Mt. Shasta will hold a public hearing on November 12, 2024 at 5:30 pm at Mt. Shasta City Park Upper Lodge 1315 Nixon Rd., Mt. Shasta, CA 96067. The purpose of the hearing will be to update residents on the progress of the 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00094 and 20-CDBG-CV2/3- 00106 programs. The project is being funded through a Community Development Block Grant provided by the California Housing and Community Development Authority.
The following information related to the project is available at 305 N. Mt. Shasta Blvd., Mt. Shasta, CA 96067 between the hours of 9:00 am to 3:00 pm on Monday–Friday or by emailing Malisa Dodd at [email protected]:
A. Project progress/status of comple�on and expected �meframe to comple�on a. The projects are completed.
• 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00094 – Food Assistance Program
• 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 – Subsistence Payment Program
B. Results to date and projected totals, such as number of beneficiaries assisted, housing units completed, por�on of project in service, or persons served. • 6,171 people were provided fresh and frozen protein and produce with 20-CDBG-CV 2/3- 00094 Food Assistance Program.
• 514 households with 1,267 people were served at least one �me for a total of 1886 payments with 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 – Subsistence Payment Program
C. Funds expended, balance of funds available, and budget expecta�ons to comple�on. • 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00094 Food Assistance Program expended $649,823.88 of its $650,000 budget. $176.12 will be disencumbered.
• 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 – Subsistence Payment Program expended its budgeted $1,769,000.00. There will be no disencumbered funds.
All persons interested in the status of funding, or the progress of the project are welcome to atend this mee�ng. Writen comments can be directed to the City of Mt. Shasta, at 305 N. Mt. Shasta Blvd., Mt.
Shasta, CA 96067, or you may contact Malisa Dodd by telephone at 530-926-7510 or email at [email protected] no later than noon on November 7, 2024, to ensure placement in the official record of the hearing.
The City of Mt. Shasta does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, na�onal origin, sex, sexual orienta�on, gender iden�fy, age, religion or disability. If you require specific accommoda�ons to par�cipate in the public hearing, please contact Kathy Joyce, Deputy City Clerk by phone at 530-926-7510 or by email at [email protected] at least 72 hours prior to the scheduled hearing.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 25 Aviso de Audiencia Pública sobre el Estado de las Ac�vidades Financiadas por Programa CDBG
SE NOTIFICA que la Ciudad de Mt. Shasta llevará a cabo una audiencia pública el 12 de noviembre de 2024 a las 5:30 pm en el Upper Lodge del Parque de la Ciudad Mt. Shasta, ubicado en 1315 Nixon Rd., Mt.
Shasta, CA 96067. El propósito de la audiencia será informar a los residentes sobre el progreso del proyecto 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00094 y 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 que está siendo financiado a través de una Subvención en Bloque para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG) proporcionada por la Autoridad de Vivienda y Desarrollo Comunitario de California.
La siguiente información relacionada con el proyecto está disponible en 305 N. Mt. Shasta Blvd., Mt.
Shasta, CA 96067 entre las 9:00 am y las 3:00 pm de lunes a viernes, o enviando por correo electrónico a Malisa Dodd a [email protected]:
A. Progreso del proyecto/estado de finalización y plazo previsto hasta su finalización a. El proyecto está terminado.
• 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00094 – Programa de Asistencia Alimentaria • 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 – Programa de Pago de Subsistencia B. Resultados hasta la fecha y totales previstos, como el número de beneficiarios asis�dos, las unidades de vivienda terminadas, la parte del proyecto en servicio o las personas atendidas. • 6,171 personas recibieron proteínas frescas y congeladas y productos con 20-CDBG-CV 2/3-00094 Programa de Asistencia Alimentaria. • 514 hogares con 1267 personas fueron atendidos al menos una vez por un total de 1886 pagos con 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 – Programa de Pago de Subsistencia C. Fondos gastados, saldo de fondos disponibles y expecta�vas presupuestarias hasta la finalización. • 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00094 Programa de Asistencia Alimentaria ha gastado $649,823.88 hasta la fecha. Se espera que se liberen $176.12 de los $650,000.00 recibidos. • 20-CDBG-CV2/3-00106 – Programa de Pago de Subsistencia ha gastado $1,769.000.00 hasta la fecha. No se prevé que se liberen fondos.
Todas las personas interesadas en el estado de la financiación o el progreso del proyecto son bienvenidas a asis�r a esta reunión. Los comentarios por escrito pueden dirigirse a la Ciudad de Mt. Shasta, en 305 N.
Mt. Shasta Blvd., Mt. Shasta, CA 96067, o puede contactar a Malisa Dodd por teléfono al 530-926-7510 o por correo electrónico a [email protected] a más tardar al mediodía del 7 de noviembre de 2024, para garan�zar su inclusión en el registro oficial de la audiencia.
La Ciudad de Mt. Shasta no discrimina por mo�vos de raza, color, origen nacional, sexo, orientación sexual, iden�dad de género, edad, religión o discapacidad. Si necesita adaptaciones específicas para par�cipar en la audiencia pública, por favor comuníquese con Kathy Joyce, Secretaria de la Ciudad, por teléfono al 530- 926-7510 o por correo electrónico a [email protected] al menos 72 horas antes de la audiencia programada.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 26 CITY OF MT. SHASTA
STAFF REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Jeff Mitchem, Planning Director
DATE: November 12, 2024
SUBJECT: First Reading
Amendment - Mt Shasta Municipal Code
Adding Chapter 18.50 Objective Design Standards
DESCRIPTION
Consideration of Ordinance CCO-24-XX (Attachment A) amending Mt Shasta Municipal Code (Title 18, Zoning) adding Chapter 18.50 Objective Design Standards (ODS).
RECOMMENDATION
Consider Mt Shasta Planning Commission recommendation to conduct a Public Hearing and introduce the attached Ordinance and waive its reading, with findings of CEQA Categorical Exemption – “Common Sense” Sect. 15061(b)(3) pursuant to the findings summarized below and conveyed in Section 3 of Attachment A.
BACKGROUND/SUMMARY
On January 8, 2024, Mt Shasta City Council adopted the 2023-31 Housing Element and on August 12, 2024 amended the Housing Element (compliance with CA Dept of Housing & Community Development findings necessary to comply with State Housing Element Law, Gov. Code, § 65580 et seq) to permit multi-family housing by-right, in zoning districts that currently allow multi-family housing (R-3, C-1 and C-2), subject to ODS.
On November 28, 2023, the Mt Shasta Planning Commission appointed an ODS Subcommittee comprised of Chair Findling, Commissioner McDowell and Commissioner Saryon. Between December 2023 and July 2024, the ODS Subcommittee conducted six meetings to develop and refine ODS for consideration by the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission conducted eight public meetings to discuss ODS and on October 15, 2024, unanimously adopted Resolution PC 2024-02 recommending the City Council amend the Mt Shasta Municipal Code adding Chapter
18.50 Objective Design Standards for review of multi-family housing.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 27
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The City Council hereby determines the subject municipal code amendment does not have the potential to cause a significant impact to the environment and is hereby found to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as follows.
1) The municipal code amendment will not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment.
2) The municipal code amendment does not make any changes to the General Plan land use map and would not modify any land use designations, allowed densities, or land use intensities established by the General Plan.
3) The municipal code amendment would not result in any changes to the intensities or densities of allowed uses beyond those allowed by the General Plan and those standards currently required by State law.
4) The municipal code amendment does not entitle, propose, or otherwise require the construction of new development or rehabilitation of existing development. 5) The municipal code amendment does not increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing.
6) The municipal code amendment implements housing policies and programs of the 2023- 31 Housing Element in order for the City of Mt. Shasta to comply with State housing law.
Please refer to Section 3 of Attachment A hereto for expanded findings.
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Ordinance CCO-24-XX
Exhibit A – Objective Design Standards
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 28 1 ORDINANCE CCO-24-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MT SHASTA
AMENDING MT SHASTA MUNICIPAL CODE
ADDING CHAPTER 18.50 OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
WHEREAS, On January 8, 2024, the City Council adopted the 2023-2031 Housing Element and on August 12, 2024 amended the Housing Element to permit multi-family housing by-right subject to Objective Design Standards pursuant to state law; and
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2024, the Mt Shasta Planning Commission held a duly notice public hearing and unanimously adopted Resolution PC 2024-XX recommending the City Council amend the Mt Shasta Municipal Code adding Chapter 18.50 Objective Design Standards for review of multi-family housing; and WHEREAS, on October 30, 2024, public notice of the November 12, 2024, City Council meeting to consider the Objective Design Standards was published in the Mt Shasta Herald; and WHEREAS, on October 30 2024, public notice of the November 12, 2024, City Council meeting to consider the Objective Design Standards was distributed to those requesting notice and posted to the city website and bulletin boards; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Objective Design Standards at a duly noticed regular meeting on November 12, 2024. Prior to taking action on the Objective Design Standards, the City Council received written and oral reports by the staff, and received public testimony; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Code Amendments referenced herein and attached as Exhibit A do not make any changes to the General Plan land use map and would not modify any land use designations, allowed densities, or land use intensities established by the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the Municipal Code Amendments referenced herein and attached as Exhibit A implement housing policies and programs of the 2023-31 Housing Element in order for the City of Mt. Shasta to comply with State housing law; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Mt Shasta City Council as follows:
Section 1. The above recitals are hereby declared to be true and correct and are incorporated into the resolution asfindings of the City of Mt ShastaCity Council.
Section 2. The City Council hereby declares that the Municipal Code Amendments referenced herein and attached as Exhibit A are consistent with the Mt Shasta General Plan.
Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the Mt Shasta Municipal Code adding Chapter 18.50 Objective Design Standards for review of multi-family housing as specified in the Ordinance incorporated by reference herein and attached as Exhibit A.
Section 4. The City Council hereby determines that the City as lead agency determined the subject municipal code amendment does not have the potential to cause a significant impact to the environment and is hereby found to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as the municipal code amendment will 1) not result in any direct or indirect physical changes to the environment; 2) the municipal code amendment does not make any changes to the General Plan land use map and would not modify any land use designations, allowed densities, or land use intensities established by the General Plan; 3) the municipal code amendment would not result in any changes to the intensities or Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 29 2 densities of allowed uses beyond those allowed by the General Plan and those standards currently required by State law; 4) the municipal code amendment does not entitle, propose, or otherwise require the construction of new development or rehabilitation of existing development, 5) the municipal code amendment does not increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing, but rather implements housing policies and programs of the 2023-31 Housing Element in order for the City of Mt. Shasta to comply with State housing law.
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15300.2 (a) through (f) list specific exceptions that dictate when a Categorical Exemption may not be used. In the discussion below, each exception (in italics) is followed by an explanation of why the exception does not apply to the project. 15300.2(a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances, except where the project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. [This exception is also interpreted to apply to “general rule” exemptions.] As discussed further under the categories below, the municipal code amendment applies city-wide, does not require rezoning and is consistent with all applicable policies of the General Plan. The municipal code amendment does not change City policy impacting any area within the City containing environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. Thus, this exception (a) does not apply to the proposed project. 15300.2(b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The municipal code amendment is not a serial legislative action and therefore cannot contribute to significant cumulative impacts. Thus, this exception (b) does not apply to the project. 15300.2(c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The municipal code amendment establishes a regulatory framework applicable city-wide for reviewing multiple family housing projects if and when they are proposed and determined by Staff to be Code Compliant (conforming to all applicable standards in the General Plan and Municipal Code). Adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS does not increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing. Further, the ordinance does not concentrate or shift property uses, intensity or density within the City.
- Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Noise, and Transportation. Adoption of the ODS would involve replacing an existing policy document and would not, in and of itself, include any proposed development. The proposed ODS does not require rezoning, and therefore do not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. Nor does adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing. Therefore, adoption of ODS would not directly or indirectly involve construction or operational activities that would generate pollutant emissions, greenhouse gas emissions or noise, and would not directly or indirectly involve activities that increase energy demand, demand for transportation facilities, or vehicle trips. There is no possibility that the ODS would have a significant effect on the environment, and no significant effect to air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, or transportation would occur.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 30 3 - Land Use and Planning. Adoption of the ODS would involve replacing an existing policy document and would not, in and of itself, include any proposed development. The proposed ODS does not require rezoning, and therefore do not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. Nor does adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing. Therefore, adoption of ODS would not involve changes to the physical environment that would physically divide an established community or result in conflicts with adopted policies and regulations that intend to avoid or mitigate and environmental effect. Therefore, there is no possibility that the HE/ODS would have a significant effect on the environment, and no significant effect to land use and planning would occur.
- Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities and Service Systems.
Adoption of the ODS would involve replacing an existing policy document and would not, in and of itself, include any proposed development. The proposed ODS does not require rezoning, and therefore do not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. Nor does adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing. Therefore, adoption of ODS would not induce substantial unplanned population growth or displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing; result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities; or result in physical deterioration of existing parks or recreation facilities. Similarly, the ODS would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities; nor generate demand for water supply or solid waste service. As such, there is no possibility that the ODS would have a significant effect on the environment and no significant effect to these environmental resource areas would occur. - Wildfire. Adoption of the ODS would involve replacing an existing policy document and would not, in and of itself, include any proposed development. The proposed ODS does not require rezoning, and therefore do not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. Nor does adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing. Therefore, adoption of ODS would not impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; exacerbate wildfire risks; require the installation or maintenance of infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risks; or expose people or structures to significant risks as a result of post fire slope instability or drainage changes. As such, there is no possibility that the ODS would have a significant effect on the environment, and no significant effect to wildfire would occur.
Thus, this exception (c) does not apply to the project. 15300.2(d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR. The scenic beauty of Mt Shasta is recognized by the National Park Service as integral to the Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway All-American Road network.
Protecting this nationally valued resource is reinforced by the Mt Shasta General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element Goal OC-7: Protect the scenic resources of the Mt Shasta area. Scenic resources are addressed by Policies OC-7.1 and OC-7.2 and all projects under review by this Chapter shall comply. Implementing these policies, the amendment conveys objective standards Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 31 4 to preserve public views by stepping development back from public rights of way. - Aesthetics. Adoption of the ODS would involve replacing an existing policy document and would not, in and of itself, include any proposed development. The proposed ODS does not require rezoning, and therefore does not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. Nor does adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing. Therefore, adoption of ODS would not cause a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, create a new source of substantial light or glare, or otherwise alter the existing visual character of the city, Therefore, there is no possibility that the ODS will have a significant effect on the environment, and no significant effect to aesthetics would occur. Thus, this exception (d) does not apply to the project.
15300.2(e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.
- Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality. Adoption of the ODS would involve replacing an existing policy document and would not, in and of itself, include any proposed development. The proposed ODS does not require rezoning, and therefore does not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. Nor does adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing.
Therefore, adoption of ODS would not directly or indirectly involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, nor create a significant hazard to the public or environment.
Similarly, the ODS would not involve changes in land use or ground disturbance that would violate water quality standards, substantially decrease groundwater supplies, substantially alter existing drainage patterns, or release pollutants in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zone.
There is no possibility that the ODS would result in a significant effect on the environment.
No significant effect to hazards and hazardous materials or hydrology and water quality would occur. Thus, this exception (e) does not apply to the project. 15300.2(f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. - Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Biological Resources, Cultural/Historical Resources, Geology and Soils, Mineral Resources, and Tribal Cultural Resources.
Adoption of the ODS would involve replacing an existing policy document and would not, in and of itself, include any proposed development. The proposed ODS does not require rezoning, and therefore do not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. Nor does adoption of the Mt Shasta ODS increase with certainty the likelihood that multifamily housing development will occur anywhere in the city currently zoned for multifamily housing. Therefore, adoption of ODS would not directly or indirectly involve land use changes or ground disturbance that would convert agricultural land to non-agricultural use; result in the loss or conversion of forest land; result in a substantial adverse effect to special status species, habitat, or wildlife movement; cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic or archaeological resource, or human remains; cause substantial adverse effects related to seismicity, ground failure, erosion, or geologic stability; result in the loss of availability of a mineral resource; or cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource. Therefore, there is no possibility that the ODS would have a significant effect on the environment. No significant effect to agriculture and forestry resources, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, mineral resources, or Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 32 5 tribal cultural resources would occur. Thus, this exception (f) does not apply to the project.
As discussed above, the ODS would not facilitate specific development projects nor require zoning or land use changes as part of its adoption or implementation, which could result in physical changes to the environment. Adoption of the ODS would not facilitate increased development beyond what is allowed in the existing General Plan. As demonstrated above, the ODS would not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and it is not subject to CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(2). Additionally, as demonstrated above, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the ODS would have a significant effect on the environment and no exceptions to categorical exemption apply, and therefore the ODS is not subject to CEQA, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).
As such, the proposed ODS meets the criteria for the common sense exemption as identified above.
ADOPTED on November 12, 2024, by the following vote of the Mt Shasta City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DATED:
ATTEST: CITY OF MT SHASTA
Kathryn M Joyce, Deputy City Clerk John Stackfleth, Mayor FORM APPROVED:
John Sullivan Kenny, City Attorney
CERTIFICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance CCO-24-XX was introduced at a regular meeting of the Mt Shasta City Council on the 12th day of November 2024, and was adopted at a regular meeting of said Council on the ___ day of _____ 202_.
Kathryn M Joyce, Deputy City Clerk
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 33 6 Exhibit A
Chapter 18.50
OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
(Ord. CCO-XX-XX)
10.15.2024 DRAFT
Contents:
SECTION 18.50.010 Administration
(A)Purpose
(B) Annual Review
(C) Ministerial Review
(D)Density Bonus
(E) Replacement of Pre-Existing Lower Income Units
(F) Parking Ratios
(G)Code Compliant Projects
(H)Application Requirements and Timing
(I) Adjustments to Standards
(J) Voluntary Discretionary Review
SECTION 18.50.020 Definitions
(A)Purpose
(B) Definitions
SECTION 18.50.030 Objective Design Standards
I. Site Design Standards
(A)Purpose
(B) Regulations
1. Screening
2. Landscaping
3. Lighting
4. Parking and Loading
5. Snow Storage
6. Scenic Resources & Vistas
II. Building Type Standards
(A)Purpose
1. Mountain Village Theme
(B) Regulations
1. Overview of Building Types
2. Permitted Building Type by Zoning District
3. Duplex Side-by-Side
4. Duplex Stacked
5. Three/Fourplex
6. Neighborhood Townhouse
7. Cottage Court
8. Pocket Neighborhood
9. Neighborhood Courtyard
10. Multiplex
11. Main Street Building
SECTION 18.50.035 Exceptions
SECTION 18.50.040 Fees
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 34 7 SECTION 18.50.045 Appeals
SECTION 18.50.050 Miscellaneous Provisions
SECTION 18.50.055 Permit Modifications
Sections:
18.50.010 Administration
(A)Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to:
(1) Specify how the City will implement the review and approval requirements of California Government Code Sections 65650 et seq. ("State Supportive Housing Law"), 65660 et seq. ("State Low Barrier Navigation Centers Law"), and 65913.4 ("State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process"); and
(2) Facilitate the development of housing through clear and objective review of development proposals (duplexes, triplexes, multifamily housing and mixed-use) consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City's General Plan Housing Element, the City of Mt Shasta Municipal Code and these Objective Design Standards (ODS), as may be amended from time to time.
(B) Annual Review. City Planning staff shall conduct annual updates of ODS to ensure compliance with state law and report to Planning Commission on any necessary amendments.
(C) Ministerial Review. The City will Ministerially Review housing development proposals when an Applicant submits a complete application as specified by this Chapter. Ministerial Review pursuant to this chapter applies to any of the following development typologies conducted by the specified review authority:
(1) Planning Staff Review Authority. Planning Director or designee and one member of the Planning Commission shall serve as the designated review authority for the following development applications:
(a) Duplex – Side by Side. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback. (b) Duplex – Stacked. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback. (c) Three/Fourplex. A small-to-medium-sized, detached, House-Scale Building that consists of three to four side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry or individual entries along the front.
(d) Neighborhood Townhouse. A small-to-medium sized, typically attached, Rowhouse-Scale Building (up to five units side-by-side) with a rear setback. (2) Planning Commission Review Authority. Planning Commission is the designated review authority for the following development applications:
(a) Cottage Court. A group of up to nine small, detached, House-Scale Buildings arranged to define a shared court open to and visible from the street. (b) Pocket Neighborhood. A group of 5 to 10 detached, House-Scale Buildings each containing one to four units, arranged to define a shared open space. (c) Multiplex.A medium-to-large-sized, detached, Apartment-Scale Building that consists of 5 to 12 side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry. (d) Neighborhood Courtyard. A medium-to-large sized building that consists of up to 16 multiple attached and/or stacked units, accessed from a shared courtyard. (e) Main Street Building. A medium-to-large sized, Block-Scale Building.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 35 8 (D)Density Bonus. Development pursuant to the Density Bonus Housing Law. The number of Restricted Affordable Units and justification for any requested Density Bonus shall be calculated in accordance with the State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process. (E) Replacement of Pre-Existing Lower Income Units. A housing development shall replace any dwelling units proposed to be removed on a site in the manner required by the State Supportive Housing Law.
(F) Parking Ratios. The City shall not require parking beyond the maximum ratios specified in the State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process if the project is Ministerially Approved under that section of state law.
(G)Code Compliant Project. Notwithstanding the State Supportive Housing Law, the State Low Barrier Navigation Centers Law, and the State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process, Ministerially Approved housing developments and Low Barrier Navigation Centers shall be Code Compliant by meeting all objective site, design, and construction standards included in Title 15 (Buildings and Construction), Title 17 (Subdivisions), and Title 18 (Zoning) of this Code, and shall also comply with all applicable objective standards included in the City’s General Plan, applicable specific plans or planned developments adopted by the City Council, and all administrative regulations of this section.
(H)Application Requirements and Timing. The application shall include the following information:
(1) General. Aside from Ministerial Approvals for accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units as specified in State Law, any Ministerial Approval sought by an Applicant shall be made pursuant to this Chapter.
(2) Application. All applications pursuant to this chapter shall be filed with the City Planner in a form prescribed by the City Planner. The application shall be signed by all owners of real property or persons or entity with written authority of the owner(s). (3) Application Received. No application for Ministerial Approval shall be deemed received until the following have been provided:
(a) A completed application form and all documents specified in this Chapter. (b) All fees for the application as set forth in the schedule of fees established by resolution of the City Council have been paid. No fee shall be deemed received until any negotiable instrument has been cleared and funds deposited in the City's account. (4) Application Contents. The application shall include the following information:
(a) Project Description. A brief description of the proposed development, including, as applicable, the total number of dwelling units, Restricted Affordable Units, Supportive Housing Units, and/or number of beds (if Low Barrier Navigation Center proposed.) (b) Land Use/Zoning Designations. The current zoning district(s) and general plan land use designation(s) and assessor's parcel number(s) of the project Site. (c) Mapping, Illustrations and Supporting Data. A vicinity map and Site plan, drawn to scale, including building footprints, driveway, landscaping concept (plant massing, species list, irrigation method) and parking layout/quantity. Other information as necessary to convey the proposal’s compliance with Objective Design Standards conveyed by this chapter.
(d) Density Bonus. Written request and reasonable justification for any requested density bonus, incentive, waiver, or modification to zoning standards. (e) Unit Plan. A plan diagram showing location of, as applicable, Restricted Affordable Units, Supportive Housing Units, onsite Supportive Services, Low Barrier Navigation Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 36 9 Center beds, and all other dwelling units within the proposed housing development or Low Barrier Navigation Center.
(f) Supportive Housing Units. If a reduction in Supportive Housing Units is requested due to the termination of project-based rental assistance or operating subsidy through no fault of the project owner, an explanation of good faith efforts by the owner to find other sources of financial support, how any change in the number of Supportive Service Units is restricted to the minimum necessary to maintain the project's financial feasibility, and how any change to the occupancy of the Supportive Housing Units is made in a manner that minimizes tenant disruption and only upon the vacancy of Supportive Housing Units.
(5) Application Review and Approval Process. Upon determination of complete application by the Planning Director or designee, the application review and approval process shall consist of:
(a) Review Body. An application for Ministerial Approval shall be acted upon by the specified Review Authority (refer to 18.50.010(C)), pursuant to the decision findings presented by the City Planner.
(b) Grounds for Approval. Before approving an application for Ministerial Approval, the City Planner must make the following findings based on evidence in the record, as applicable, that:
(i) The development proposal is eligible for Ministerial Approval pursuant to Section
18.50.010 of this chapter.
(ii) If the application includes a request for a density bonus, incentive, waiver, or modification under this chapter, a finding that all the requirements for density bonuses and/or other incentives that are specified in this chapter have been or will be met.
(iii) The application is compliant with all applicable provisions of the City’s development regulations as conveyed by the General Plan, Municipal Code, standards for land use near streams and wetlands, Active Transportation Plan, Public Works Standards, and City Fire Department and CalFire standards. (c) Grounds for Denial. Upon determination of complete application by the Planning Director or designee, grounds for project denial shall consist of:
(i) Not Code Compliant. If the planner determines that a development submitted pursuant to this section is not compliant with all applicable provisions of the City’s development regulations as conveyed by the General Plan, Municipal Code, standards for land use near streams and wetlands, Active Transportation Plan, Public Works Standards, and City Fire Department and CalFire standards. in conflict with any of the objective planning standards, they shall provide the development proponent written documentation in support of its denial identifying with specificity the standard or standards the development conflicts with, and an explanation for the reason or reasons the development conflicts with that standard or standards, within the timeframe specified in state law. (ii) Resubmittal. A determination of inconsistency with objective planning standards does not preclude the development proponent from correcting any deficiencies and resubmitting an application for streamlined review, or from applying for the project under other local government processes.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 37 10 (iii) Revisions. If the application can be brought into compliance with minor changes to the proposal, the planner may, in lieu of making the detailed findings referenced above, allow the development proponent to correct any deficiencies within the timeframes for determining project consistency specified by state law. (d) Permit Conditions of Approval. Following are standard Conditions of Approval to be applied to all approvals under this chapter.
(i) Term. Unless otherwise required by state law, Ministerial Approvals shall automatically expire three years from the date of the final action establishing that approval, unless otherwise provided in the permit. The duration of the approval may be extended as provided for in state law.
(ii) Statutory Compliance. Following approval of an application under the Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process, but prior to issuance of a building permit for the development, the City Planner may require changes to the development that substantially conform with the original approval and are necessary to comply with the objective uniform construction codes (including, without limitation building, plumbing, electrical, fire, and grading codes), to comply with federal or state laws, or to mitigate a specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety and there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact. A "specific, adverse impact" has the meaning defined in Government Code section 65589.5(d)(2).
(iii) Installation of public improvements. All public improvements shall be constructed as conveyed by applicable provisions of the Mt Shasta Municipal Code, at the determination of the Director of Public Works.
(iv) Construction Clean-up. It shall be a violation of this title for any person responsible for construction including but not limited to the permit holder and any contractor thereof to fail to keep the public right-of-way free from construction dirt and debris. All on-site construction debris shall be removed at least weekly. (v) Maintenance of Landscape. It shall be a violation of this title for any property owner or other person in control of any site to fail to install or maintain any landscaping required by a permit or approval issued pursuant to this chapter or otherwise in a manner that fails to fully comply with the applicable provisions of the Mt Shasta Municipal Code. Any vegetation, required by a permit or approval, or otherwise by this Code, which is dead or dying, shall be replaced within sixty days.
(vi) Hours of Construction within 500 feet of a residential unit. No applicant or agent of an applicant shall suffer or allow any construction activity on a site located within 500 feet of a residential unit before 7:00 a.m. or after 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, or at any time on weekends.
(vii) Stormwater. All projects approved under this chapter shall follow the stormwater management requirements listed in the Mt Shasta Municipal Code, as applicable. (viii)Map. Prior to the approval of a Tract or Parcel Map (if applicable) by the City Planner, or the issuance of Building permits, whichever occurs first, all projects approved under this chapter shall satisfy all applicable Public Works, Fire Department and Building Division requirements.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 38 11 (ix) MSMC Title 18. All projects approved under this chapter shall, if required by the Zoning Ordinance, satisfy the performance standards within the Mt Shasta Municipal Code as applicable.
(I) Adjustment to Standards. Adjustments to these Objective Design Standards may be granted as follows:
(1) Density Bonus. Density Bonus concession, incentives and waivers are defined below.
They may not be used to waive applicable building code and life safety standards and shall be recorded with the County prior to issuance of Final Occupancy Permit. (a) Concessions & Incentives (4 or less). Concessions and incentives, as defined under State law, allow a developer to deviate from those design standards/regulations when such regulations potentially make the project economically infeasible for the developer to build. The number of concessions/incentives that can be requested by a developer varies by the amount and type of reserved affordable units being proposed, as reflected in the chart below. Percentages between these ranges are rounded down.
Income Category % of Reserved Affordable
Units
Very Low 5% 10% 15% 80%
Low 10% 17% 24% 80%
Moderate 10% 20% 30% 80%
Senior N/A N/A 100% N/A
Max # of Incentives 1 2 3 4
(b) Waivers (unlimited). Waivers are yet another form of assistance under State law, separate from concessions and incentives. A waiver is a reduction in development standards and other regulations when those requirements potentially make the construction of the project physically infeasible, if not approved. Unlike concessions and incentives, there is no limit in the number of waivers an applicant can request. (c) Justification. The City requires that Applicants provide reasonable documentation as to why the requested incentives will reduce affordable housing development costs.
Absent this justification, the requested incentives may be subject to denial pursuant to
18.50.010 (D) 1.4.
(d) Denial. Denial of requested incentives or waivers shall only be made based on findings of non-compliance with 18.50.010 (D) 1.3 and/or substantial evidence that the incentive would be contrary to state or federal law, or would have a specific, adverse and unavoidable impact on public health, safety or on a listed historic property.
(e) Parking. The City may not require more than the following parking ratios for a density bonus project, as amended by state law (inclusive of parking for persons with disabilities):
Studio 1 space
1 Bedroom 1 space
2 Bedroom 1.5 spaces
3 Bedroom 1.5 spaces
4 Bedroom 2.5 spaces
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 39 12 (2) Market Rate Project Waivers. Waivers for market-rate projects may be granted as necessary to comply with the adopted Building Code subject to approval by the City Building Official.
(J) Voluntary Discretionary Review. As a procedural alternative to the regulations of these Objective Design Standards, Applicants may choose to meet the discretionary regulations of MSMC Chapter 18.60 Architectural Review.
18.50.020 Definitions
(A)Purpose. All terms used in this Chapter that are defined in the State Supportive Housing Law, State Low Barrier Navigation Centers Law, and the State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process shall have meaning established by their respective sections, as may be amended from time to time.
(B) Definitions. When the following terms are used in this chapter, they shall have the meaning established by this section. Where the terms set forth in this chapter are inconsistent with the definition of the same terms set forth in State law, the statutory definitions shall prevail. (1) "Applicant" means the owner of the property, or person or entity with the written authority of the owner, that submits and application for Ministerial Approval. (2) “Building Main Body” A building’s primary massing.
(3) “Building Type” means one of the following residential development types regulated by this chapter:
(a) Duplex – Side by Side. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback. The building consists of two side-by-side units, both facing the street and within a single Building massing. The type has the appearance of a medium-to-large, single-unit house and is scaled to fit within lower-intensity neighborhoods. (b) Duplex – Stacked. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback. The building consists of two stacked units, both facing the street and within a single building massing. The type has the appearance of a medium-to-large, single-unit house and is scaled to fit within lower-intensity neighborhoods.
(c) Three/Fourplex. A small-to-medium-sized, detached, House-Scale Building that consists of three to four side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry or individual entries along the front. The type has the appearance of a medium-sized, single-unit house and is scaled to fit within low- to moderate-intensity neighborhoods.
(d) Neighborhood Townhouse. A small-to-medium sized, typically attached, Rowhouse-Scale Building (up to five units side-by-side) with a rear setback. Each Neighborhood Townhouse consists of one unit. The type may also be detached with minimal separations between buildings. The type is typically located within low-to-moderate-intensity neighborhoods. (e) Cottage Court. A group of up to nine small, detached, House-Scale Buildings arranged to define a shared court open to and visible from the street. The shared court is common open space and takes the place of a private rear setback, thus becoming an important community-engaged place. The type is scaled to fit within low-to-moderate-intensity neighborhoods and in small-scale mixed-use contexts. (f) Pocket Neighborhood. A group of 5 to 10 detached, House-Scale Buildings each containing one to four units, arranged to define a shared open space. The shared open Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 40 13 space is common open space and takes the place of a private rear setback. The type is scaled to fit within low-to-moderate intensity neighborhoods. (g) Multiplex. A medium-to-large-sized, detached, Apartment-Scale Building that consists of 5 to 12 side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry.
The type is scaled to fit within moderate-intensity neighborhoods. (h) Neighborhood Courtyard. A medium-to-large sized building that consists of up to 16 multiple attached and/or stacked units, accessed from a shared courtyard. The shared court is common open space and takes the place of a rear setback. The type is typically integrated as transitional density between moderate- to high-intensity neighborhoods.
(i) Main Street Building. A medium-to-large sized, Block-Scale Building. The type is intended to provide a vertical mix of uses with ground-floor retail, office, or service uses and upper-floor service or residential uses. The type makes up the primary component of high-intensity neighborhoods and downtown main streets. (4) “Building Scale”
(a) House-Scale. A scale of building typical of a small to large single-family residence supporting multiple residential units.
(b) Apartment-Scale. A scale of building typical of a free-standing rental apartment building with a building mass between that of house and block. (c) Block-Scale. A scale of building typical of a downtown (5) “Building Wings.” Appendages on a building’s Main Body, required to be smaller in size and height than the main body to visually reduce the overall size of a building. (6) "City Planner" means the Planner or Planning Director. (7) "Ministerial Approval" means any approval related to a housing development or a Low Barrier Navigation Center that meet the requirements of the State Supportive Housing Law, the State Low Barrier Navigation Centers Law, and/or the State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process and does not require the exercise of judgement or deliberation by the review body.
(8) “MSMC”. Mount Shasta Municipal Code.
(9) “Parking”. The following parking terms are used in this chapter:
(a) Tuck-under. Parking spaces covered by the upper stories of a building but otherwise open.
(b) Garage. Parking space(s) within a free-standing or attached structure enclosed by walls.
(c) Carport. Parking space(s) within a free-standing or attached structure with open sides.
(d) Podium. On-grade parking spaces covered by the upper stories of a building but enclosed by walls.
(e) Subterranean. Below-grade parking spaces covered by the upper stories of a building.
(10) "Restricted Affordable Unit" means a dwelling unit within a housing development that will be available at an Affordable Rent or Affordable Housing Cost as specified in the State Supportive Housing Law and the State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process. (11) “Scenic Vista” is a publicly accessible viewpoint that provides expansive views of scenic resources. For the purposes of this chapter, a scenic vista shall mean any public right-of-way or publicly owned land.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 41 14 (12) "State Housing Density Bonuses and Incentives Law" means Government Code Section 65915 et seq. and all amendments and additions thereto, now or hereinafter enacted, that impose requirements applicable to the City related to the provision of housing Density Bonus(es) and Incentives.
(13) "State Low Barrier Navigation Centers Law" means Government Code 65660 et seq. and all amendments and additions thereto, now or hereinafter enacted, that impose requirements applicable to the City related to Ministerial Approvals and Uses by Right. (14) "State Streamlined Ministerial Approval Process" means Government Code Section 65913.4 and all amendments and additions thereto, now or hereinafter enacted, that impose requirements applicable to the City related to Ministerial Approvals. (15) "State Supportive Housing Law" means Government Code Sections 65650 et seq. and all amendments and additions thereto, now or hereinafter enacted, that impose requirements applicable to the City related to Ministerial Approvals and Uses by Right. (16) “Human Scale”. “Human scale” means building elements bearing a definite relationship to the human in dimension; a component that the human can associate with directly. The relationship between the dimensions of the human body and the proportion of the spaces which people use. Human scale design typically reflects the elements listed below:
(a) Buildings that avoid long, monotonous, uninterrupted walls or roof planes. Blank, windowless walls are generally avoided along street frontages. Where solid walls are required by building codes, the wall should be articulated by the provision of blank window openings trimmed with frames, sills, lintels, or, if the building is occupied by a commercial use, by using recessed or projecting display window cases; (b) Structures that incorporate awnings or arcades.
18.50.030 Objective Design Standards
For projects subject to the regulations of this chapter, the Objective Design Standards, containing specific site design and building type standards, have been adopted and are incorporated herein by reference. Complete applications as specified by 18.50.010 (H) of this chapter shall be subject to review by the Objective Design Standards in effect at the time of application completeness.
The contents of the Objective Design Standards are:
I. Site Design Standards
(A)Purpose
(B) Regulations
(1) Screening
(2) Landscaping
(3) Lighting
(4) Parking
(5) Snow Storage
(6) Scenic Resources & Vistas
II. Building Type Standards
(A)Purpose
(B) Regulations
(1) Overview of Building Types
(2) Permitted Building Types by Zoning District
(3) Duplex: Side by Side
(4) Duplex: Stacked
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 42 15 (5) Three/Fourplex
(6) Neighborhood Townhouse
(7) Cottage Court
(8) Pocket Neighborhood
(9) Multiplex
(10) Neighborhood Courtyard
(11) Main Street Building
18.50.035 Exceptions. The following are exempt from the provisions of this chapter. (A)Maintenance and Emergency Repairs.
(1) “Maintenance” as used in this section means the upkeep of property, consisting of exterior painting within the parameters of the City of Mt. Shasta design guidelines or replicating the existing colors of the building, window and door replacement, reroofing, the addition of landscaping, or other work which, in the opinion of the Building Official, would not change the design of the subject structure.
(2) “Emergency repairs” as used in this section means actions deemed by the Building Official as being required to preserve health and/or safety. (B) Single-family dwellings in zoning districts allowed by MSMC Chapter 18.16.
18.50.040 Fees. The City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta shall adopt applicable fees for design review, such fees to be fixed by resolution, and to be in an amount equal to the costs of processing design review applications as specified by the Planning Director or designee at the time of application submittal.
18.50.045 Appeals. The applicant may file an appeal to the City Council on any decision of the Planning Commission on architectural review pursuant to Chapter 18.32 MSMC.
18.50.050 Miscellaneous provisions.
(A)Noncompliance.
(1) In addition to any other fines, penalties or enforcement provisions set forth in this chapter, failure to comply in any respect with an approved architectural review application shall constitute grounds for the immediate stoppage of the work involved in said noncompliance until the matter is resolved.
(2) An occupancy permit shall not be issued in part or whole for any building or group of buildings subject to architectural review unless and until the work specified in the architectural review approval has been completed.
(B) Revocation, Expiration and Extension of Approval.
(1) In any case wherein demolition or removal of any existing structure is proposed, architectural review and approval is required. Said demolition or removal shall be completed, and all debris removed from the site, within the specific period of days designated in the design review approval, or the entire approval shall be deemed to have expired and all work is to be stopped as per subsection (A)(1) of this section. (2) Architectural review approvals shall automatically expire in one year unless a different expiration date or unlimited expiration is stipulated at the time of approval. Prior to the expiration of an architectural review approval, the applicant may apply to the Planning Director for an extension of one year from the original date of expiration. The Planning Director shall grant the extension and may make minor modifications of the approved design at the time of extension if they find that there has been no substantial change in the factual circumstances surrounding the originally approved design. Any further extensions beyond one year shall require Planning Commission approval.
18.50.055 Permit modifications. The Planning Director may approve minor modifications of an approved Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 43 16 permit upon a finding that any such changes would not alter the overall design and layout of the project.
Section 18.50.030 OBJECTIVE DESIGN STANDARDS
FOR RESIDENTIAL & MIXED-USE PROJECTS
Contents
PART I Site Design Standards
(C) Purpose
(D) Regulations
1. Screening
2. Landscaping
3. Lighting
4. Parking and Loading
5. Snow Storage
6. Scenic Resources & Vistas
PART II Building Type Standards
(C) Purpose
1. Mt Village Theme
(D) Regulations
2. Overview of Building Types
3. Permitted Building Types by Zoning District
4. Duplex Side-by-Side
5. Duplex Stacked
6. Three/Fourplex
7. Neighborhood Townhouse
8. Cottage Court
9. Pocket Neighborhood
10. Neighborhood Courtyard
11. Multiplex
12. Main Street Building
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 44 17 PART I SITE DESIGN STANDARDS
Sections:
(A) Purpose
(B) Regulations
1. Screening
2. Landscaping
3. Lighting
4. Parking
5. Snow Storage
6. Scenic Resources & Vistas
(A) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to ensure that development complies with General Plan goals related to site constraints, development design and resource protection. These regulations meet this intent by ensuring that development accomplishes the following:
1. No Adverse Impact. Does not adversely affect neighboring properties and abutting public right-of-way. "Adversely affect" means to impact in a substantial, negative manner community habitability, public safety and/or welfare.
2. Desired Development. Makes a positive contribution to the desired development pattern of the area;
3. Context Responsive. Must be responsive to existing conditions of neighboring properties and city scenic resources;
4. Preserve the Visual Environment. Location and screening of building mass, dark-sky lighting, building step-down, and screened parking areas serve to mitigate visual impacts of development and preserve visual resources; and
5. Pedestrian Orientation. New or altered structures shall prioritize pedestrian safety, access and comfort.
(B) Regulations
1. Screening. The intent of these standards is to protect property, enhance privacy, attenuate noise, and improve the visual environment.
1.1 Height Maximums. Screening shall not exceed the maximums identified in Table A (Maximum Screening Height).
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 45 18 Table A Maximum Screening Height
Zone Item
Maximum Height Allowed
Front Side St* Side** Rear**
R-1/B-1
Fence 4’ 4’ 6’ 6’
Free Standing
Wall 4’ “ “ “
Landscaping 4’ “ “ “
R-1
Fence 4’ 4’ 6’ 6’
Free Standing
Wall 4’ “ “ “
Landscaping 4’ “ “ “
R-1-U
Fence 4’ 4’ 6’ 6’
Free Standing
Wall 4’ “ “ “
Landscaping 4’ “ “ “
R-2
Fence 4’ 4’ 6’ 6’
Free Standing
Wall 4’ “ “ “
Landscaping 4’ “ “ “
R-3
Fence 4’ 4’ 6’ 6’
Free Standing
Wall 4’ “ “ “
Landscaping 4’ “ “ “
C-1
Fence 4’ 4’ 6’ 6’
Free Standing
Wall 4’ “ “ “
Landscaping 4’ “ “ “
C-2
Fence 4’ 4’ 6’ 6’
Free Standing
Wall 4’ “ “ “
Landscaping 4’ “ “ “
*(w/in 25’ of intersection)
**Decorative lattice may extend beyond height limit by 2’.
1.2 Screening on Retaining Walls. The total height of screens and the retaining walls they are mounted on or attached to shall not exceed six feet.
1.3 Mechanical Equipment Screening
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 46 19 A. The following mechanical equipment is exempt from screening:
(1) Free-standing or roof-mounted solar equipment; and
(2) Vents less than two feet in height.
B. For new installation or relocation of existing mechanical equipment, the equipment shall be screened.
(1) Roof-Mounted Equipment. Building parapets or other architectural elements in the building’s architectural style shall screen roof-mounted equipment.
(a) New buildings shall be designed to provide a parapet or other architectural element that is as tall or taller than the highest point on any new mechanical equipment to be located on the roof of the building; and
(b) For existing buildings with no parapet less than two feet in height, mechanical equipment shall be surrounded on all sides by an opaque screen wall as tall as the highest point of the equipment.
The wall shall be architecturally consistent with the building and match the existing building with paint, finish, and trim cap detail. (2) Wall- and Ground-Mounted Equipment
(a) Equipment is not allowed between front or side street facades and the street.
(b) All screen devices shall be as high as the highest point of the equipment being screened.
(c) Equipment and screening shall be in compliance with the setbacks of the zone.
(d) Screening shall be architecturally compatible and include matching paint, finish, and trim cap of the building.
1.4 Screening Materials.
A. Open View Fencing. Minimum visual permeability between public street frontage and site shall be 50%.
B. Prohibited Materials. Barbed wire and razor wire screening materials are prohibited.
2. Landscaping. The intent of these standards is to protect and enhance the environmental and visual quality of the community, enhance privacy, and control fugitive dust.
A. Location. These standards apply in conjunction with Mt Shasta Municipal Code Chapter 15.42 Water Efficient Landscaping. Landscaping materials shall be integrated within: Building Setbacks, Stream and Wetland Buffers and Parking Lots pursuant to Section 18.50.030 (B) 4.
2.1 Materials. Landscaping materials shall comply with the following:
A. Shrubs, of at least one-gallon size;
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 47 20 B. Ground cover instead of grass/turf; and/or
C. Decorative nonliving landscaping materials including, but not limited to, sand, stone, gravel, wood or water may be used to satisfy a maximum of 25 percent of the required landscaping area.
2.2 Species. Species shall meet the minimum standards, in conformance with California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Community gardens are encouraged.
2.3 Common Open Space Amenities. At least one of the following amenities shall be provided within required Common Open Space: play structure, seating area, bench, picnic table, kiosk, shelter.
2.4 Accent Paving. Pedestrian pathways and crossings within parking lots shall be demarcated with decorative paving materials or colors contrasting with the ground plane material.
2.5 Trash Enclosure. Trash receptacles shall be contained and covered by an enclosure constructed of the same materials as the primary building.
2.6 Utilities. All utilities shall be undergrounded (refer to MSMC Section
18.20.070.) Utility cabinets shall be screened with enclosure, fencing or landscaping (refer to 18.50.030(B) 1.3.)
3. Lighting. The intent of these standards is to implement the goals of the general plan and protect the natural scenic value of Mt Shasta, by establishing regulations to reduce light pollution.
3.1 Exterior Lighting. All on-site lighting shall be human scale, downward illuminated and shielded pursuant to the following:
A. Essential. Lighting shall be designed for an essential purpose by being targeted and timing controlled as conveyed in Lighting Plan (Item 3.1 E).
B. Low Illumination. Illumination levels shall be no brighter than necessary as conveyed in Lighting Plan (Item 3.1 E) and be of warmer-color wavelength.
C. Cut-off Fixtures. Lighting shall be full cut-off fixtures and downward facing and no direct light shall bleed onto adjacent properties. The applicant must provide an outdoor lighting report which provides information on how outdoor lighting will be accomplished to minimize impacts on adjacent properties or roadways.
D. Fixture Height. To minimize any indirect overflow of light on adjacent properties, the height of any proposed parking lot light standard shall be no higher than 12’ to the base of fixture shield.
E. Lighting Plan. Development applications shall include sufficient information, in the form of an overall exterior lighting plan, to enable the City to determine that the applicable provisions will be satisfied. The exterior lighting plan shall include at least the following:
(1) Demonstrated compliance with 3.1 A-D of this subsection.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 48 21 (2) Manufacturer specification sheets, cut-sheets or other manufacturer provided information for all proposed lighting fixtures. (3) The proposed location, mounting height, and orientation of all exterior lighting fixtures.
(4) If building elevations are proposed to be illuminated, drawings shall be provided for all relevant building elevations showing the fixtures, the portions of the elevations to be illuminated, the illuminance levels of the elevations, and the orientation of any remote light fixture. (5) To review proposed exterior lighting installations, the applicant shall supply the following information:
(a) A brief written narrative, with accompanying plan or sketch, which demonstrates the objectives of the lighting.
(b) Outline specifications for all lamps (bulbs), and other descriptive information on the fixtures, and, if applicable or required, designation as Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA) “cut-off” fixtures.
(c) Relative landscaping information that indicates mature tree size, shrubbery and other vegetation in order to evaluate the long-term and seasonal effectiveness of lighting or screening of lighting.
4. Parking. The intent of these standards is to minimize the appearance of vehicle parking, enhance walkability, preserve the environmental and visual quality of the community, enhance privacy, attenuate noise, and control dust. These regulations shall apply in addition to MSMC Chapter 15.44 Off-street Parking Requirements.
4.1 Location. The placement of vehicle parking areas is regulated in order to minimize the expansive appearance of parking fields and the visual impact of parking areas on abutting residential uses.
A. Vehicle Area. Vehicle parking and access is prohibited between the primary structure and a street except as follows.
(1) Projects under 5 units.
(2) Building Lines. Vehicle area located entirely behind the front and side street building lines of a primary structure are allowed; and (3) Frontage Limitation. Vehicle area is allowed on driveways limited to no more than 40% of the primary building frontage.
(4) Alleys. On a lot abutting an alley, all vehicle areas must be accessed from, and oriented to, the alley. Snow removal shall be the responsibility of property owner or management.
(5) Bicycles. Both long- and short-term bicycle parking shall be designed and constructed with an architectural style, exterior colors and materials that match the structures in the project containing dwelling units.
4.2 Size. Parking lots larger than 4,500 square feet in size (approximately 20 +/- spaces) shall be broken down into smaller parking areas with planted Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 49 22 landscape areas with a minimum width of 15 feet between them to minimize the perceived scale of the parking fields. Parking fields shall be separated from buildings as follows:
A. Parking lots with 11-20 spaces shall be separated at least by five feet from buildings to make room for a sidewalk, landscaping, and/or other planting between the building and the parking area;
B. Parking lots with more than 20 spaces shall be separated by at least 12 feet from buildings to make room for a sidewalk, landscaping, and other planting between the building and the parking area; and C. The required separation may be eliminated to the rear of buildings in areas designed for unloading and loading of materials.
4.3 Landscaping. The following standards apply to new driveways and new parking areas in all zones when the new parking area is at least 4,500 square feet in total area. The site must include:
A. Tree canopy. Tree canopy must shade at least 40 percent of the parking area. The amount of shade is determined by the diameter of the mature crown spread stated for the species of the tree.
B. Perimeter Landscaping. Landscaped setback of 6’ from property line, including stormwater retention.
C. Interior Landscaping. 30 square feet of interior landscaped area for each parking space containing landscaping consisting of ground cover, low shrubs or pervious material. Interior landscaping must be arranged in linear strips at least 3 feet wide between rows of parking stalls.
D. Permeable Pavement. Perimeter and interior landscaping requirements may be reduced by 75% with the provision of pervious paving material for the entire parking area.
E. Solar Panels. Perimeter and interior landscaping requirements may be reduced by up to 75% with the provision of equal coverage of solar panels.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 50 23 5. Snow Storage. Each unenclosed parking area, including circulation drives and aisles, shall provide a snow storage area(s) equal to one-quarter of the total gross parking and driveway area.
5.1 Exceptions. The size of the area may be reduced if:
A. The size and configuration of snow storage area(s) allow ramping or other removal and storage methods which reduce the amount of area necessary to store snow in comparison to normal snow removal and storage operations; or
B. A long-term snow hauling plan is adopted as part of the project and the snow hauling plan demonstrates the property owner and/or snow removal contractor has sufficient rights to an off-site storage area(s) to store excess snow from the property with an acceptable method to transport the snow from the property to the off-site storage area(s); or
C. An acceptable method to remove and store snow from the property has been adopted as part of the project and the method(s) clearly demonstrate that the amount of snow storage area(s) required by this section is not necessary.
5.2 Snow Storage Area Standards:
A. Shall be located near the sides or rear of parking areas, away from the primary street frontage;
B. Shall be located to maximize solar exposure to the greatest extent feasible.
Areas shaded by structures or vegetation shall be avoided; C. Shall be located so that snow moving equipment is not required to enter the public streets to move snow to the storage area;
D. Shall be located in areas that are substantially free and clear of obstructions (e.g. propane tanks, trees, large boulders, trash enclosures, utility pedestals);
E. May be located within parking areas but each parking space shall be considered one half of a parking space needed toward meeting parking requirements for the use; and
F. May be located within required landscaping areas but the areas shall be planted with landscaping tolerant of snow storage.
G. Snow storage areas shall be designed to provide adequate drainage to prevent ponding and the formation of ice, especially within pedestrian areas and driveways.
H. Drainage from snow storage areas shall be directed towards drainage retention/treatment facilities.
I. Minimum dimensions. The minimum dimension of a snow storage area shall be 10 feet in any direction.
J. Neither the building nor any accessory structure, shall be designed to allow snow to shed onto adjacent properties, on-site parking or entry areas.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 51 24 6. Scenic Resources and Vistas. The scenic beauty of Mt Shasta is recognized by the National Park Service as integral to the Volcanic Legacy Scenic Byway All-American Road network. Protecting this nationally valued resource is reinforced by the Mt Shasta General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element Goal OC-7: Protect the scenic resources of the Mt Shasta area. Scenic resources are addressed by Policies OC-7.1 and OC-7.2 and all projects under review by this Chapter shall comply.
Additionally, in terms of 1) Scenic Resource, Protection of the scenic resource itself and 2) Scenic Vista, development shall be regulated as follows:
6.1 Scenic Resources. Specified scenic resources in the Mt Shasta area are conveyed in General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element as including Mount Shasta, Castle Crags, Black Butte, Mount Eddy and the Eddy range.
Because these scenic resources are located outside the City and, therefore, not within the regulatory authority of the City and this code, the scenic resource protection strategy (as conveyed by General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element Policy OC-7.2) is for the City to work with the County to protect scenic resources.
6.2 Scenic Vistas. The intent of these standards is to implement General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element Policy OC-7.1 by locating development outside of a scenic vista. For the purposes of this regulation, ‘scenic vista’ is defined (§18.50.020 (B) (11)) as any public right-of-way or publicly owned land.
A. Reduced Bulk Zone. To protect Scenic Vistas, a Reduced Bulk Zone is established to restrict building footprint and height along any parcel line abutting a publicly owned parcel.
B. Upper-Level Step-back. In addition to the required setback for the zoning district, upper-level floors shall step-back on any street-facing façade, to not conflict with a 45-degree daylight plane from the right-of-way line at a point 10 feet above the ground plane.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 52 25 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 53 26 PART II BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS
Sections:
(A) Purpose
1. Mountain Village Theme
(B) Regulations
1. Overview of Building Types
2. Permitted Building Type by Zoning District
3. Duplex Side-by-Side
4. Duplex Stacked
5. Three/Fourplex
6. Neighborhood Townhouse
7. Cottage Court
8. Pocket Neighborhood
9. Multiplex
10. Neighborhood Courtyard
11. Main Street Building
(A) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide standards for conventional building types to achieve the intended small-town character of Mt Shasta neighborhoods, allow for architectural variety while increasing affordable housing opportunities within pedestrian-oriented neighborhoods.
Mountain Village Theme. With respect to architectural theme, the City of Mt Shasta established the following aspirational statement in the 1988 Design Guidelines:
The overriding design philosophy of the City of Mt. Shasta is to establish an attractive, comfortable, contemporary village with its own identity, while complementing rather than competing with the natural landscape.
The architectural theme for the City of Mt. Shasta has been directed as establishing a compatibility between buildings and the natural environment fulfilling the expectations of visitors as a retreat to the mountains and respecting both the historic precedent of local buildings and traditional mountain architecture.
As seen from a distance, the Mt. Shasta Mountain Village Concept should represent an uncomplicated whole; in detail, at the pedestrian level, an exciting vitality and broad individual expression is encouraged.
To more clearly convey design principles espoused by this statement, the adopted 2010 Design Guidelines edify this theme as follows:
Mount Shasta is a village in the mountains and there are design features consistent with mountain living that are appropriate for, and desired by, this community.
The 2010 Design Guidelines do not identify specific design features consistent with mountain living. Therefore, these Objective Design Standards seek to do so by identifying the following as recommendations to consider in resolving architectural design:
1. Mountain Village Design Considerations. Housing projects subject to these objective design standards are advised to consider the following elements in resolving design solutions that provide four-season weather protection and convey mountain themed materiality.
1.1 Snow. Roof pitch to shed snow, overhanging architectural projections to protect pedestrians, elevated porches, and entries to maintain accessibility Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 54 27 under heavy snow conditions, snow storage areas pursuant to standards herein (refer to Section 18.50.030 (B)(5)).
1.2 Sun. Covered walkways, sun/shade structures in common open space, recessed balconies on upper units, operable balcony screens, etc.
1.3 Rain. Arcades, recessed ground floors, canopies, awnings, etc.
1.4 Wind. Evergreen landscaping, lee structures such as walls/fences/berms, operable wind screens as façade elements, recessed or oblique entries, etc.
1.5 Materials. Historic construction materials in mountain communities are generally a mix locally available materials providing an indigenous look and feel. In Mt Shasta, the combination of wood and stone is used extensively in a variety of textures and patterns. It is not necessary to use the actual material as manufacturers offer successful simulated products.
(B) Regulations
1. Overview of Building Types. The following regulations articulate the desired size, scale and basic form of residential and mixed-use buildings allowed. The underlying density and intensity standards conveyed by the General Plan and Title 18 Zoning shall apply as the baseline from which eligible density bonus is derived. The intent of these regulations is to create structural and spatial variety that is contextually responsive while avoiding monotonous or overpowering institutional appearance, particularly for block-scale or larger developments.
1.1 Primary Building Type. Each site shall have only one primary building type unless as provided for below in Exceptions. Primary Building Types permitted are:
A. Duplex – Side by Side. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback.
B. Duplex – Stacked. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback.
C. Three/Fourplex. A small-to-medium-sized, detached, House-Scale Building that consists of three to four side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry or individual entries along the front.
D. Neighborhood Townhouse. A small-to-medium sized, typically attached, Rowhouse-Scale Building (up to five units side-by-side) with a rear setback.
E. Cottage Court. A group of up to nine small, detached, House-Scale Buildings arranged to define a shared court open to and visible from the street.
F. Pocket Neighborhood. A group of 5 to 10 detached, House-Scale Buildings each containing one to four units, arranged to define a shared open space.
G. Multiplex. A medium-to-large-sized, detached, Apartment-Scale Building that consists of 5 to 12 side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry.
H. Neighborhood Courtyard. A medium-to-large sized building that consists of up to 16 multiple attached and/or stacked units, accessed from a shared courtyard.
I. Main Street Building. A medium-to-large sized, Block-Scale Building.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 55 28 1.2 Exceptions. More than one building type is allowed on a parcel that identifies proposed multiple design site lines meeting the setback standards of the zone.
Examples
(1) A parcel large enough to accommodate multiple design sites but smaller than the size of a block; or
(2) A parcel large enough to create one or more new blocks.
1.3 On-site open space. These standards apply in addition to the landscape standards of Section 18.50.030 (B) 2. Open space configurations vary by building type as specified in this section.
1.4 Parking. Parking quantity shall comply with MSMC Chapter 15. 44 and Section 18.50.030 Part I (B)4 of this chapter. Parking configurations vary (tuck-under, detached garage(s), podium or subterranean) by building type as specified in this section.
1.5 Building Wings. Wings are required to be smaller in size and height than the main body to visually reduce the overall size of a building. To further this objective, the standards specify the amount that wings are required to be offset from the main body so that their facades are not aligned. Wings may be the same number of stories and height as the main body when a density bonus is applied to the building.
1.6 Building and Fire Code. New buildings and their improvements are subject to the City’s standards for Fire Safety and Building Safety.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 56 29 2. Permitted Building Types by Zoning District. Table A identifies the building types permitted in each zoning district. All development regulations including density and intensity and site development standards conveyed in MSMC Chapter 18.16 shall prevail.
Table 18.50.020 Table A – Permitted Building Types
Building Type
Standards
Section R1 R2 R3 C1 C2 EC
Duplex
Side-by-side
18.50.040 (B)
3.
Duplex Stacked 18.50.040 (B)
4.
Three/Fourplex 18.50.040 (B)
5.
Neighborhood
Townhouse
18.50.040 (B)
6.
Cottage Court 18.50.040 (B)
7.
Pocket
Neighborhood
18.50.040 (B)
8.
Multiplex 18.50.040 (B)
9.
Neighborhood
Courtyard
18.50.040 (B)
10.
Main Street
Building
18.50.040 (B)
11.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 57 30 3. DUPLEX: SIDE-BY-SIDE
3.1 Description. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback. The building consists of two side-by-side units, both facing the street and within a single Building massing. The type has the appearance of a medium-to-large, single-unit house and is scaled to fit within lower-intensity neighborhoods.
3.2 Number of Units. Units per site – 1. Units per building – 2.
3.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 58 31 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Chapter
18.16 Main Body
(A) Width 48’ max
(B) Depth 36’ max
Wing(s)
(C) Width 15’ max
(D) Depth 24’ max
Separation 15’ min
(E) Offset 5’ min
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 59 32 3.4 Pedestrian Access (E). Main entrance shall be covered and face the street. On a corner site, each unit shall face a different street.
3.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (F). Provision of parking shall comply with Section
18.50.030 (B)4. Parking location shall be to rear of the site and configured as covered or uncovered.
3.5.1 Constrained Lot Exception. An exception may be granted by the review authority pursuant to the findings of MSMC Section 18.28.030.
3.6 Open Space. Minimum – 400 sf. Width – 20’ min (G). Depth – 20’ min (H). May be Private or Common Open Space with an all-weather surface accessible from an entrance of each unit.
3.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. Front (A). End of roof form oriented to front.
B. Side (B). Side of roof form oriented to front.
C. Multiple (C-E). Either front or side orientation allowed. Variable massing proportion allowed.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 60 33 3.8 Balconies & Porches. Balconies and covered entry porches must be provided on dwelling units facing a street.
3.9 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage.
If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement.
(A) (B) (C)
(D) (E)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 61 34 4. DUPLEX: STACKED
4.1 Description. A small-sized, detached, House-Scale Building with small-to-medium setbacks and a rear setback. The building consists of two stacked units, both facing the street and within a single building massing. The type has the appearance of a medium-to-large, single-unit house and is scaled to fit within lower-intensity neighborhoods.
4.2 Number of Units. Units per site – 2. Buildings per Design Site – 1 max.
4.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 62 35 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Chapter
18.16 Main Body
(A) Width 48’ max
(B) Depth 36’ max
Wing(s)
(C) Width 15’ max
(D) Depth 24’ max
Separation 15’ min
Offset 5’ min
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 63 36 4.4 Pedestrian Access (E). Each unit shall have an entry facing the street on or within 15’ of the front façade. On corner design sites, each unit shall front a different street.
4.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (F). Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
4.6 Open Space. Minimum – 225 sf. Width – 15’ min (G). Depth – 15’ min (H). Sall be Common Open Space with an all-weather surface accessible from an entrance of each unit.
4.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. Front (A). End of roof form oriented to front.
B. Side (B). Side of roof form oriented to front.
C. Multiple (C-E). Either front or side orientation allowed. Variable massing proportion allowed.
(A) (B) (C)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 64 37 4.8 Balconies. Balconies and covered entry porches must be provided on dwelling units facing a street.
4.9 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage. If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement. (D) (E)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 65 38 5. THREE/FOURPLEX
5.1 Description. A small-to-medium-sized, detached, House-Scale Building that consists of three to four side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry or individual entries along the front. The type has the appearance of a medium-sized, single-unit house and is scaled to fit within low- to moderate-intensity neighborhoods.
5.2 Number of Units. Units per building – 4 max. Buildings per Design Site – 1 max.
5.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 66 39 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Chapter
18.16 Main Body
(A) Width 48’ max
(B) Depth 48’ max
Wing(s)
(C) Width 15’ max
(D) Depth 20’ max
Separation 15’ min
Offset from
Main Body
5’ min
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 67 40 5.4 Pedestrian Access. Main entrance shall be oriented to front street (E). Each unit may have an individual entrance.
5.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (F). Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
5.6 Open Space. Minimum – 225 SF. Width – 15’ min (G). Depth – 15’ min (H). Shall be common open space with an all-weather surface accessible from the nearest public right-of-way.
5.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. Front (A). End of roof form oriented to front.
B. Side (B). Side of roof form oriented to front.
C. Multiple (C). Either front or side orientation allowed. Variable massing proportion allowed.
5.8 Balconies. Balconies and covered entry porches must be provided on dwelling units facing a street.
(A) (B) (C)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 68 41 5.9 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage.
If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 69 42 6. NEIGHBORHOOD TOWNHOUSE
6.1 Description. Neighborhood Townhouse. A small-to-medium sized, typically attached, Rowhouse-Scale Building (up to five units side-by-side) with a rear setback.
Each Neighborhood Townhouse consists of one unit. The type may also be detached with minimal separations between buildings. The type is typically located within low-to-moderate-intensity neighborhoods.
6.2 Number of Units. Up to 5 units side-by-side. Buildings per Design Site – 1 max.
6.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 70 43 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Chapter
18.16 Main Body
(A) Width 24’ max
(B) Depth 30’ max
Wing(s)
(C) Width 14’ max
(D) Depth 25’ max
Separation 15’ min
Offset 5’ min
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 71 44 6.4 Pedestrian Access (E). Main entrance shall be oriented to front street. Each unit shall have an individual entrance.
6.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (F). Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 Part I (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
6.6 Open Space (G). Minimum – 96 SF. Width – 12’ min. Depth – 8’ min. Shall be private open space with an all-weather surface accessible from each unit.
6.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. Front (A). End of roof form oriented to front.
B. Side (B). Side of roof form oriented to front.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 72 45 C. Multiple (C). Either front or side orientation allowed. Variable massing proportion allowed.
6.8 Balconies. Balconies and covered entry porches must be provided on dwelling units facing a street.
6.9 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage. If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement. (A) (B) (C)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 73 46 7. COTTAGE COURT
7.1 Description. A group of up to nine small, detached, House-Scale Buildings arranged to define a shared court open to and visible from the street. The shared court is common open space and takes the place of a private rear setback, thus becoming an important community-engaged place. The type is scaled to fit within low-to-moderate-intensity neighborhoods and in small-scale mixed-use contexts.
7.2 Number of Units. Units per building – 1. Buildings per Design Site – 9 max.
7.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 74 47 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Chapter
18.16 Main Body
(A) Width 32’ max
(B) Depth 32’ max
(C)
Separation
between
cottages 7’ min
Wing(s)
Not Allowed
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 75 48 7.4 Pedestrian Access. Shared court shall be accessible from front street (D). Building entrance setback from pedestrian path shall be 6’ minimum (E).
7.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (F). Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 Part I (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
Spaces may be individually accessible by each unit and/or clustered at rear of site.
7.6 Open Space. Minimum – 1,500 SF. Width – 20’ min (G). Depth – 75’ min (H). Shall be common open space with an all-weather surface accessible from entrance of each unit. Up to 1/3 of the shared court(s) may be used for stormwater management if designed as a rain garden or bioswale.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 76 49 7.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. Front (A). End of roof form oriented to front.
B. Side (B). Side of roof form oriented to front.
C. Multiple (C). Either front or side orientation allowed. Variable massing proportion allowed.
7.8 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage.
If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement.
(A) (B) (C)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 77 50 8. POCKET NEIGHBORHOOD
8.1 Description. A group of 5 to 10 detached, House-Scale Buildings each containing one to four units, arranged to define a shared open space. The shared open space is common open space and takes the place of a private rear setback. The type is scaled to fit within low-to-moderate intensity neighborhoods.
8.2 Number of Units. Units per Building – 4 max. Buildings per Design Site – as allowed by density provisions of underlying zoning district pursuant to MSMC Chapter 18.16.
8.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 78 51 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Chapter
18.16 Buildings along Front
& Side Street
(A) Width 60’ max
(B) Depth 40’ max
Buildings along
Side & Rear
(C) Width 36’ max
(D) Depth 48’ max
(E)
Side Setback
in Addition
to Zoning
District 5’ min
Building
Separation
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 79 52 (F)
Between 1-
story
Buildings 10’ min
Between
Buildings >
1-story 15’ min
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 80 53 8.4 Pedestrian Access. Main entrance (G): buildings with 1 unit – oriented to common open space. Buildings with 2 or more units (H) – at least one entrance oriented to front or side street. Pedestrian path width along buildings & open space (I) – 5’ min; at front or side street connection (J) – 10’ min. Pedestrian path setback from building entrance (K) – 12’ min; from side of building (L) – 8’ min.
8.5 Vehicle Access & Parking. Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 Part I (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
Parking shall be offset from buildings (M) – 5’ min. Parking prohibited abutting private or common open space.
8.6 Open Space. Private open space (N) shall be provided for full length of building facades abutting pedestrian path or common open space. Common open space shall be provided Width (O) – 30’ min. Depth (P) – 40’ min.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 81 54 8.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. Front (A). End of roof form oriented to front.
B. Side (B). Side of roof form oriented to front.
C. Multiple (C). Either front or side orientation allowed. Variable massing proportion allowed.
8.8 Balconies. Balconies and covered entry porches must be provided on dwelling units facing a street.
8.9 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage.
If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement.
(A) (B) (C)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 82 55 9. MULTIPLEX
9.1 Description. A medium-to-large-sized, detached, House-Scale Building that consists of 5 to 12 side-by-side and/or stacked units, typically with one shared entry. The type is scaled to fit within moderate-intensity neighborhoods.
9.2 Number of Units. Units per Building – 12 max. Buildings per Design Site – as allowed by density provisions of underlying zoning district pursuant to MSMC Chapter 18.16.
9.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 83 56 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Zoning
District
(Chapter
18.16)
Main Body
(A) Width 60’ max
(B) Depth 60’ max
Wing(s)
(C) Width 24’ max
(D) Depth 40’ max
Separation
between
wings 15’ min
Offset from
Main Body 5’ min
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 84 57 9.4 Pedestrian Access (E). Main entrance location shall be oriented to front street. Units in the main body shall be accessed by common entry along front street. On corner sites, units in a wing may enter from the side street.
9.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (F). Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 Part I (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
9.6 Open Space. Common or private open space is not required.
9.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. Side. This massing type is a simple rectilinear form that is longer than it is deep.
B. Front. This massing type divides the facade into three equal parts.
C. L. This massing type divides the facade into five equal parts, with two parts projecting and three parts set back to create a shallow forecourt.
D. Center. This massing type divides the facade into three equal parts, with the middle third projecting.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 85 58 E. Twin. This massing type divides the facade into three parts, with the middle part set back slightly to create a shallow open space.
9.8 Balconies. Balconies and covered entry porches must be provided on dwelling units facing a street.
9.9 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage.
If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement.
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 86 59 10. NEIGHBORHOOD COURTYARD
10.1 Description. A medium-to-large sized building that consists of up to 16 multiple attached and/or stacked units, accessed from a shared courtyard. The shared court is common open space and takes the place of a rear setback. The type is typically integrated as transitional density between moderate- to high-intensity neighborhoods.
10.2 Number of Units. Units per Building – 16 max. Buildings per Design Site – as allowed by density provisions of underlying zoning district pursuant to MSMC Chapter 18.16.
10.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the objective standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 87 60 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Zoning
District
(Chapter
18.16)
Main Body
(A) Width 100’ max
(B) Depth 100’ max
Wing(s)
Not Allowed
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 88 61 10.4 Pedestrian Access (C). Main entrance shall be oriented to courtyard or front street.
Each ground floor unit shall have an individual entrance oriented to courtyard or any street.
10.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (D). Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 Part I (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
10.6 Open Space. Minimum – 1,500 SF. Width (E) – 25’ min. Depth (F) – 60’ min. Shall be common open space with an all-weather surface accessible from each unit.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 89 62 10.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped or shed. Multiple bays allowed.
A. U-Shaped (A). Façade is divided into three parts forming a ‘U’ in plan.
B. L-Shaped (B). Façade is divided into two parts forming an ‘L’ in plan.
10.8 Balconies. Balconies and covered entry porches must be provided on dwelling units facing a street.
10.9 Windows. Ground floor window coverage shall be 30% of wall area facing a Front Street. On corner lots, ground floor window coverage shall be 20% of wall area facing a Side Street. Glazed garage and person doors shall count toward % coverage.
If garages are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement.
(A) (B)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 90 63 11. MAIN STREET BUILDING
11.1 Description. A medium-to-large sized, Block-Scale Building. The type is intended to provide a vertical mix of uses with ground-floor retail, office, or service uses and upper-floor service or residential uses. The type makes up the primary component of high-intensity neighborhoods and downtown main streets.
11.2 Number of Units. Units per building – unrestricted. Buildings per site – 1 max.
11.3 Building Size & Massing. Refer to the objective standards by design element on the following page.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 91 64 Key Design Element Standard
Building Height
Refer to
Zoning
District
(Chapter
18.16)
Main Body
(A) Width 100’ max
(B) Depth 90’ max
Wing(s)
Not Allowed
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 92 65 11.4 Pedestrian Access. Main entrance location shall be oriented to front or side street. Upper floor units shall be accessed by a common entry from the front or side street (C). Ground floor shops and residential units shall have individual entries on the front or side street (D).
11.5 Vehicle Access & Parking (E). Driveway and parking location shall comply with standards in 18.50.030 Part I (B)4. Parking may be covered, uncovered or in a garage.
11.6 Open Space. Common or private open space is not required.
11.7 Massing Composition. Following, are the allowed massing standards that apply to the Main Body. Roof form may be gable, hipped, shed or flat.
Multiple bays allowed.
A. Flat Box (A). This massing type is a simple rectilinear form that is deeper than it is long.
B. Flat Bar (B). This massing type is a simple rectilinear form that is longer than it is deep.
C. Flat L (C). This massing type divides the facade into five equal parts, with two parts projecting and three parts set back to create a shallow forecourt.
D. Flat T (D). This massing type divides the facade into three equal parts, with the middle third projecting.
E. Flat Forecourt (E). This massing type divides the facade into three parts, with the middle part set back slightly to create a shallow open space.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 93 66 F. Flat Courtyard (F). This massing type divides the facade into three parts, with the middle part set back substantially to create a deep open space.
11.8 Balconies. Balconies must be provided on 75 percent of the dwelling units facing a street.
11.9 Windows. Ground floor windows must cover 60% of the ground floor wall area of facades facing a Front and a Side Street. If garage bay doors are offset from the main body by a minimum of 3’, the garage door wall area shall be exempt from the requirement.
(A) (B) (C)
(D) (E) (F)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 94 City Council Agenda Item #10
Staff Report
Meeting Date: 11/12/2024
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Subject: Adoption of a Resolution in Support of the Infrastructure Finance Plan (IFP) and the Formation of the EIFD
Recommended Action: Approve the Resolution in Support of the adoption of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) for the Formation of the Mount Shasta Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and the Allocation of Property Tax Increment within the Mount Shasta EIFD
INTRODUCTION
As a result of the elimination of redevelopment agencies in California, the City of Mount Shasta (“City”) lost a tax increment financing (TIF) tool to invest in public facilities supporting the development of communities. In 2014, SB 628 created a new tax increment financing tool called the Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD). The original legislation has been amended to modify the EIFD formation procedural requirements and requirements to issue bonds to finance infrastructure.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
EIFDs aid cities in funding public facilities and other public investments to foster future development and increase property values. By capturing tax increment revenue generated within the district as new development occurs and property values increase over time, like a redevelopment project area, a portion of tax increment revenue is redirected from the taxing entity to the EIFD. Importantly, the establishment of EIFDs does not increase property taxes or any other taxes for landowners within or outside the EIFD boundaries.
The following chart illustrates how tax TIF captures that new revenue from new development into the EIFD (note these dollars are for illustrative purposes only):
X Regular
Consent
Closed
Presentation
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 95 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 96 On September 11, 2023, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention to initiate the establishment of the City of Mount Shasta Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (Mount Shasta EIFD) and establish the Mount Shasta EIFD Public Financing Authority (PFA) as the governing body.
Subsequently, on May 22, 2024, the PFA ordered the preparation of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) as required by the EIFD Law (California Government Code Section 53398.50 through 53398.88). The IFP is the legal document describing the EIFD, and it is to be adopted by the City Council and PFA to guide the use of incremental tax revenues over the life of the EIFD. Public notices were mailed, information was posted on a dedicated website (https://www.mtshastaca.gov/public-finance-authority/page/enhanced-infrastructure-financing-district-eifd), and notices were also published in the newspaper, as required by law, to inform property owners and residents.
On October 2, 2024, the PFA received a presentation of the IFP, taking no action at that time.
Following that public meeting, the PFA must hold three public hearings before considering the approval of the IFP. The first public hearing was held on ???, and a notice for the public hearing was published for four consecutive weeks in advance of that date.
To date, City staff and its EIFD consultants have received ??? public inquiries regarding the EIFD, both of which from property owners seeking to understand the potential implications of EIFD implementation on their properties. Following responses to all questions, feedback from property owners was positive and supportive of the EIFD.
ANALYSIS
The current IFP is included in the Resolution as Exhibit A. It contains all items required by California Government Code Section 53398.63. A summary of the key requirements contained in the IFP is provided below.
1. EIFD Map and Legal Description. The proposed EIFD boundaries are focused on the Landing and various other development opportunity sites. The land included in these boundaries totals approximately 760 acres (approx. 32% of the City).
2. Public Facilities and Development Proposed within the EIFD. The public capital facilities proposed to be financed through the EIFD include:
• Housing and commercial supportive infrastructure (e.g., roadway improvements, utility enhancements, remediation activities)
• Potential water tank improvements in northern region of the City
3. Use of Incremental Tax Revenue. The EIFD will use incremental property tax revenue to finance public facilities and maintenance of those public facilities, and administration of the EIFD. The City would allocate a maximum of 50% of its future share of future property tax increment within the EIFD. Based on projected growth of assessed value, total EIFD funding capacity is estimated at approximately $2 million on a present-value basis.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 97
5. Necessity and Goals of the EIFD: The formation of the EIFD is necessary to assist in the financing of the construction of the targeted public facilities that serve the EIFD boundary and surrounding community while providing significant communitywide benefits. These public facilities will catalyze private sector investment and development to support the City's General Plan and provide the infrastructure foundation for the development of critically needed housing in the community and greater region.
6. Economic and Fiscal Impacts: Establishing the EIFD is a necessary step towards the successful development of the public facilities and other projects of communitywide significance, which will generate positive economic benefits to the City and other taxing entities. Fiscal impact analysis prepared by Kosmont Companies as Appendix D to the IFP estimates that EIFD activity would generate approximately $12 million in net positive general fund revenues on present value basis for the City. Additionally, the Analysis highlights the job opportunities generated by the EIFD, including approximately 1,200 direct, indirect, and induced temporary constructed-related jobs and over 240 permanent ongoing jobs in the City and County.
Next Steps
The PFA must hold two more public hearings before final approval of the IFP. These public meetings and hearings are scheduled to occur in placeholder month and placeholder month. If the IFP is modified after City Council action this evening, the modified IFP would be required to return to the City Council for approval prior to EIFD formation.
The PFA may adopt the IFP at the third public hearing to form the EIFD. A summary of the key actions for establishing the EIFD, as well as estimated dates of completion, is as follows:
Task Target Date Notes
PFA holds Public Hearing #2 Dec 4, 2024 Additional comments taken; PFA takes action to approve, modify, or reject IFP
PFA holds Public Hearing #3
and Protest Proceeding
Jan 6, 2024 If majority protest exists – takes action to terminate EIFD. If no majority protest, PFA
can propose adoption of the IFP and
formation of the EIFD
Staff files EIFD with State
Board of Equalization (BOE)
PLACEHOLDER,
2024
In the event of a majority protest by property owners or residents within the boundaries, the formation proceedings would be discontinued.
CEQA REVIEW
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 98 The City Council’s adoption of the Resolution approving the EIFD IFP is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as they are actions solely related to the creation of a government funding mechanism and the administrative or organizational activities of the City. Therefore, this action does not constitute a “project” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15378(b)(4) and 15378(b)(5). This action could not result in a physical change in the environment because the City has not committed itself to any specific project(s) that could be funded by the EIFD. As a separate and independent ground, this action is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that they will have a significant effect on the environment. However, future actions (such as the approval of infrastructure improvements using funding from the EIFD) will be subject to environmental review in accordance with CEQA.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate fiscal impact for establishing the Mount Shasta EIFD. If ultimately established, the EIFD would create the opportunity to use tax increment financing to fund targeted infrastructure investments in the City. If the EIFD is formed, future budget actions will be required to budget the allocation of incremental tax revenues to the EIFD.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Adopt Resolution 2024-XXX, approving the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) for the Mount Shasta Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD) and the allocation of property tax increment within the Mount Shasta EIFD Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 99 -2-
RESOLUTION CCR-24-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN FOR THE MOUNT SHASTA
ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT AND THE
ALLOCATION OF THE CITY’S INCREMENTAL PROPERTY TAX
REVENUE WITHIN THE MOUNT SHASTA ENHANCED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 53398.68 AND 53398.75
WHEREAS, the California Legislature enacted California Government Code sections 53398.50 through 53398.88 (“EIFD Law”) authorizing cities and counties to form enhanced infrastructure financing districts within defined areas and use incremental property tax revenue generated from the growth in property taxes collected from within such districts to finance certain infrastructure and community benefit projects; and
WHEREAS, in enacting the EIFD Law, the California Legislature found and determined that with the dissolution of redevelopment agencies, public benefits will accrue if local agencies are provided a means to finance certain public infrastructure and community benefit projects authorized under the EIFD Law; and
WHEREAS, on September 11, 2023, the City Council of the City of Mount Shasta (“City Council”) adopted Resolution No. 2023-26 (“Resolution of Intention”), which initiated the process to establish the Mount Shasta Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (“Mount Shasta EIFD”) pursuant to EIFD Law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the City Council found that the Mount Shasta EIFD is necessary for the area within the boundaries of the Mount Shasta EIFD and the City of Mount Shasta (“City”) and declared that, pursuant to the EIFD Law, if approved by resolution pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.68, incremental property tax revenue from the City within the Mount Shasta EIFD may be used to finance the activities described in the Resolution of Intention; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the City Council established the Mount Shasta EIFD Public Financing Authority (“PFA”) to serve as the governing board of the Mount Shasta EIFD; and
WHEREAS, on May 22, 2024, pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.63, the PFA directed the Executive Director of the PFA to prepare a draft Infrastructure Financing Plan (“IFP”) for the Mount Shasta EIFD, which IFP is attached hereto as “Exhibit A” and is available for inspection at Mount Shasta City Hall, 305 North Mount Shasta Boulevard, Mount Shasta, CA, 96067; and Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 100 -3-
WHEREAS, the IFP, among other things, includes a description of the public facilities to be financed by the Mount Shasta EIFD and a financing section that includes, among other things, a specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the City proposed to be committed to the Mount Shasta EIFD for each year during which the Mount Shasta EIFD will receive incremental tax revenue, and a projection of the amount of tax revenues expected to be received by the Mount Shasta EIFD in each year during which the Mount Shasta EIFD will receive tax revenues, including an estimate of the amount of tax revenues attributable to the City for each year; and
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2024, the PFA held a public meeting to present the IFP and on November 4, 2024, the PFA held a public hearing to consider oral and written comments to the IFP; and
WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to adopt this Resolution pursuant to Government Code Section 53398.68 to approve the IFP, substantially in the form prepared by the Executive Director of the PFA, including the allocation of incremental tax revenue of the City in accordance with Government Code Section 53398.75 as set forth in the IFP.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Mount Shasta does hereby find, determine, conclude and resolve as follows:
Section 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals of this Resolution are true and correct.
Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the IFP for the Mount Shasta EIFD substantially in the form presented to the City Council and attached hereto as “Exhibit A”, including, but not limited to, the specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the City to be committed to the Mount Shasta EIFD for each year during which the Mount Shasta EIFD will receive incremental tax revenue.
Section 3. The City Manager, or designee, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or advisable to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Resolution.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council and the City Clerk shall cause a copy thereof to be forwarded to the PFA.
Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Mount Shasta shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 101 -4-
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of November, 2024 by the following vote:
AYES: NOES: ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
DATED: November 12, 2024
ATTEST: CITY OF MT. SHASTA
______________________________ ______________________________ Kathryn M. Joyce, Deputy City Clerk John Stackfleth, Mayor I, Kathryn M. Joyce, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Mount Shasta, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Mount Shasta, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 12th day of November 2024.
Kathryn M. Joyce, Deputy City Clerk
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 102
CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA ENHANCED
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT
INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING PLAN
Nov. 4th, 2024
Prepared By:
Prepared For:
The City of Mount Shasta
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 103 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure Financing
Plan Nov. 4th, 2024
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3
2.0 Description of the Proposed District.................................................................................... 7
3.0 Description of Proposed Facilities and Development.......................................................... 8
4.0 Finding of Communitywide Significance ........................................................................... 12
5.0 Financing Section............................................................................................................. 13
6.0 Removal of Dwelling Units and Replacement Housing Plan .............................................18
7.0 Goals of the District..........................................................................................................19
8.0 Appendices ...................................................................................................................... 20 Index of Appendices
Appendix A: Map of Boundaries of the Mount Shasta EIFD
Appendix B: Legal Description of the Mount Shasta EIFD
Appendix C: Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis
Appendix D: Fiscal Impact Analysis
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 104 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov.
4th, 2024 Page 3
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background & Purpose
Background. Pursuant to the Resolution of Intention adopted by the City Council of the City of Mount Shasta on September 11, 2023 (amended April 8, 2024) and Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code (the “EIFD Law”), the City Council of the City of Mount Shasta (the “City”) declared its intention to establish the Mount Shasta Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (“Mount Shasta EIFD” or “District”). Pursuant to the same Resolution of Intention, the City Council of the City established the “Mount Shasta EIFD Public Financing Authority” (“PFA”) as the governing body of the Mount Shasta EIFD.
At its inaugural meeting on May 22, 2024, the PFA directed its Executive Director, who is the City Manager of the City, to prepare an infrastructure financing plan (“IFP”) for the Mount Shasta EIFD.
Purpose of the Mount Shasta EIFD. The Mount Shasta EIFD is intended to serve as a catalyst for private sector investment and critical public infrastructure with transformative potential for the Mount Shasta EIFD area and the City as a whole. The Mount Shasta EIFD encompasses approximately 760 acres of land, representing approximately 32% of the acreage currently within City limits (approximately 15% of the existing assessed property value within the City as of Fiscal Year 2023-2024). An additional approximately 148 acres that is currently in incorporated Siskiyou County jurisdiction has been identified as a potential future “expansion area” for the EIFD, if the areas were annexed into the City in the future. The Mount Shasta EIFD includes the property known colloquially as “The Landing” and other underutilized parcels with potential for private investment, where current land use guidance supports a diversity of uses promoting economic development of, and enhancement of quality of life within, the boundaries of the EIFD and the surrounding community.
1.2 Contents and Overview of this Infrastructure Financing Plan (“IFP”) Pursuant to Government Code Sections 53398.59 through 53398.74, this IFP includes the following information:
a) A map and legal description of the District, included herein as Appendix A and Appendix B, respectively.
b) A description of the public facilities and other forms of development or financial assistance that is proposed in the area of the District, including those to be provided by the private sector, those to be provided by governmental entities without assistance from the District, those public improvements and facilities to be financed with assistance from the proposed Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 105 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov.
4th 2024 Page 4
District, and those to be provided jointly. The description includes the proposed location, timing, and costs of the development and financial assistance. This information is included in Section 3 of this IFP.
c) A finding that the development and financial assistance are of communitywide significance and provide significant benefits to an area larger than the area of the District.
This information is included in Section 4 of this IFP.
d) A financing section (included in Section 5 of this IFP), which contains all of the following information:
1) A specification of the maximum portion of the incremental tax revenue of the City District proposed to be committed to the District for each year during which the District will receive incremental tax revenue. The portion may change over time.
Section 5.1 and Table 3 of this IFP details the maximum portion of the incremental property tax revenue of the City proposed to be committed to the District throughout the duration of the District lifetime, which is projected to be approximately fifty (50) years from district formation. The maximum portion of the City’s property tax increment to be committed to the District is 50%. 2) A projection of the amount of tax revenues expected to be received by the District in each year during which the District will receive tax revenues. Section 5.2 and Table 3 of this IFP includes a projection of tax revenues to be received by the District by year over the course of the District’s lifetime, as described in the previous paragraph. These projections are based on research and analysis of available data at the time of IFP preparation for purposes of illustration. Actual results may differ from those expressed in this document. Appendix C provides additional detail for the projected revenue analysis.
3) A plan for financing the public facilities to be assisted by the District, including a detailed description of any intention to incur debt. Section 5.4 of this IFP includes a plan for financing the public facilities to be assisted by the District. The PFA intends to incur debt or any form of financial obligation only when it is financially prudent to do so. It is estimated at this time that the Mount Shasta EIFD will provide funding for approximately $2 million (in present value dollars) of public improvement costs. While issuance of EIFD bonds may not be financially feasible, the PFA could pursue a partnership with one or more interested private sector developers, who may be willing to advance funding for infrastructure improvements and be reimbursed from EIFD revenues as they become available. 4) A limit on the total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to the District pursuant to the plan. The total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to the District shall not exceed $12,000,000.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 106 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4,
2024 Page 5
5) A date on which the District will cease to exist, by which time all tax allocation to the district will end. The District will cease to exist on the earlier of: (i) forty-five (45) years from the date on which the issuance of bonds is approved by the PFA (not anticipated as the likely scenario), or (ii) June 30, 2076. This IFP assumes that the District will be formed in calendar year 2024, setting Fiscal Year 2025- 2026 as the base year for the EIFD, with Fiscal Year 2026-2027 anticipated as the first year of EIFD revenues.
6) An analysis of the costs to the City of providing facilities and services to the area of the District while the area is being developed and after the area is developed.
The plan shall also include an analysis of the tax, fee, charge, and other revenues expected to be received by the City as a result of expected development in the area of the District. Appendix D to this IFP includes the required Fiscal Impact Analysis. It is estimated that, at Year 15 of the District lifetime (assumed stabilized buildout of the District area), annual costs to the City will be approximately $796,000, and annual revenues to the City will be approximately $1,216,000. 7) An analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the associated development upon the City. Appendix D to this IFP includes an analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the associated development upon the City, as the only affected taxing entity that is contributing tax increment revenues to the District at this time. It is estimated that, at Year 15 of the District lifetime, the District area will generate an annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $420,000 to the City.
8) A plan for financing any potential costs that may be incurred by reimbursing a developer of a project that is both located entirely within the boundaries of that District and qualifies for the Transit Priority Project Program, pursuant to Section 65470, including any permit and affordable housing expenses related to the project. At this time, the PFA does not intend to finance any potential costs that may be incurred by reimbursing a developer of a project that is both located entirely within the boundaries of the District and qualifies for the Transit Priority Project Program, pursuant to Section 65470.
e) If any dwelling units within the territory of the District are proposed to be removed or destroyed in the course of public works construction within the area of the district or private development within the area of the district that is subject to a written agreement with the District or that is financed in whole or in part by the District, a plan providing for replacement of those units and relocation of those persons or families consistent with the requirements of Section 53398.56. The PFA does not anticipate that any housing units will be removed as a result of any project identified in this IFP. However, if any relocation of dwelling units is deemed to be required in the future for a project financed by the Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 107 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 6
District, the PFA will comply with the requirements of Government Code Section 53398.56.
f) The goals the District proposes to achieve for each project financed pursuant to Section 53398.52. Section 7 of this IFP summarizes the goals of each project to be financed by the District.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 108 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 7
2.0 Description of the Proposed District
The Mount Shasta EIFD is intended to serve as a catalyst for private sector investment and critical public infrastructure with transformative potential for the Mount Shasta EIFD area and the City as a whole. The Mount Shasta EIFD encompasses approximately 760 acres of land, representing approximately 32% of the total acreage currently within City limits (approximately 15% of the existing assessed property value within the City as of Fiscal Year 2023-2024). An additional approximately 148 acres that is currently in incorporated Siskiyou County jurisdiction has been identified as a potential future “expansion area” for the EIFD, if the areas were annexed into the City in the future. The Mount Shasta EIFD includes the Landing and other underutilized parcels with significant potential for private investment where current land use guidance support a diversity of uses promoting economic development of, and enhancement of quality of life within, the boundaries of the EIFD and the surrounding community. Appendix A includes a map of the proposed District, and Appendix B is a legal description of the District.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 109 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 8
3.0 Description of Proposed Facilities
and Development
3.1 Anticipated Future Private Development
Anticipated future private development within the Mount Shasta EIFD is summarized in Table 1 below, with greater detail provided in Appendix C. Buildout and absorption of these land uses are forecasted in the first 15 years of the District lifetime.
Table 1: Anticipated Future Private Development
Development Type SF / Units AV Per SF / Unit
Estimated AV at
Buildout
(2023 Nominal
Value)
Market-Rate Residential 160 units $250K / unit $40.0 million Affordable Housing 40 units (tax-exempt) $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF $250 PSF $6.9 million
Office / Flex 10,000 SF $200 PSF $2.0 million
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF $125 PSF $3.1 million
Hotel 75 rooms $200K / room $15.0 million
Hostel 75 rooms $100K / room $7.5 million
Estimated Total $74.5 million
Source: City of Mount Shasta Planning Staff, CoStar Property (2023)
3.2 Public Facilities to be Financed with Assistance from the Mount Shasta EIFD The EIFD Law authorizes the Mount Shasta EIFD to finance the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of 15 years or longer, if they are of communitywide significance and provide significant benefits to the Mount Shasta EIFD or the surrounding community.
The PFA intends to utilize the District to fund infrastructure projects of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits to the region over the District lifetime. Examples of potential priority infrastructure improvements to receive EIFD funding over the District’s lifetime including the following:
a) Housing and commercial supportive infrastructure (e.g., roadway improvements, utility enhancements, remediation activities)
b) Potential water tank improvements in northern region of the City Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 110 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 9
The total project costs to be supported by the EIFD are estimated at $2 million, in alignment with IFP projections of development and present-value funding capacity. It is estimated that such projects will be funded throughout the anticipated district lifetime (approximately 2026-2076).
Additional expenditures by the Mount Shasta EIFD, including any use of potential future EIFD bond proceeds, will be subject to approval by the PFA. Eligible expenditures in accordance with Government Code sections 53398.52 and 53398.56 include the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, or rehabilitation of any real or other tangible property with an estimated useful life of 15 years or longer and are projects of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits to the district or the surrounding community. The Mount Shasta EIFD may also finance the ongoing or capitalized costs to maintain public capital facilities financed in whole or in part by the Mount Shasta EIFD. Facilities funded may be located outside the boundaries of the Mount Shasta EIFD, as long as they have a tangible connection to the work of the Mount Shasta EIFD. The Mount Shasta EIFD will also finance planning and design activities that are directly related to the purchase, construction, expansion, or rehabilitation of these projects. Projects financed by the Mount Shasta EIFD may include, but not be limited to, all of the following:
• Highways, interchanges, and ramps;
• Bridges;
• Arterial streets;
• Parking facilities;
• Transit facilities;
• Parks, recreational facilities, and open space;
• Sewage treatment and water reclamation plants and interceptor pipes; • Facilities for the collection and treatment of water for urban uses; • Facilities for the transfer and disposal of solid waste, including transfer stations and vehicles;
• Storm water conveyance and collection facilities;
• Flood control levees and dams, retention basins, and drainage channels; • Child care facilities;
• Libraries;
• Broadband and telecommunications infrastructure;
• Sidewalks and streetscape improvements;
• Bicycle lanes and paths;
• Public art;
• Corporation yards;
• Police facilities;
• Brownfield restoration and other environmental mitigation; • Affordable housing as authorized under the EIFD Law;
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 111 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 10
• Projects that implement a sustainable communities strategy and transit priority projects; • Acquisition, construction, or repair of industrial structures for private use; • Acquisition, construction, or repair of commercial structures by the small business occupant of such structures, if such acquisition, construction, or repair is for purposes of fostering economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and of ensuring the long-term economic sustainability of small businesses;
• Projects that enable communities to adapt to the impacts of climate change, including, but not limited to, higher average temperatures, decreased air and water quality, the spread of infectious and vector-borne diseases, other public health impacts, extreme weather events, sea level rise, flooding, heat waves, wildfires, and drought; • Facilities in which nonprofit community organizations provide health, youth, homeless, and social services.
Other Expenses: In addition to the direct costs of the above facilities, the Mount Shasta EIFD may finance the costs of planning and design work that is directly related to the purchase, construction, expansion or rehabilitation of property, including, but not limited to, the cost of environmental evaluation and engineering and surveying costs; environmental remediation costs; construction staking costs; utility relocation and demolition costs incidental to the construction of the facilities; costs of legal services; and costs of project/construction management.
In addition, the Mount Shasta EIFD may finance any other expenses incidental to the formation, administration1 and implementation of the Mount Shasta EIFD and to the construction, completion, inspection and acquisition of the authorized facilities, including, but not limited to, the costs of creation and administration of the Mount Shasta EIFD; costs of issuance of bonds or other debt of the Mount Shasta EIFD or of any other public agency (including a community facilities district) that finances authorized facilities, and payment of debt service thereon; financing costs of improvements incurred by developers until reimbursement for the costs of the improvements from the Mount Shasta EIFD; costs incurred by the City or the Mount Shasta EIFD in connection with the division of taxes pursuant to Government Code section 53398.75; and legal costs.
1 Administration costs refer to the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of the Mount Shasta EIFD, including, but not limited to, the following: the costs of computing annual tax increment revenues and preparing the required annual reporting; the costs of allocation tax increment revenues (whether by the County, the City, or otherwise); the costs to the City, Mount Shasta EIFD, or any designee thereof in complying with disclosure requirements; the costs associated with preparing required disclosure statements and responding to public inquiries regarding the Mount Shasta EIFD; and the costs of the City, Mount Shasta EIFD, or any designee thereof related to any appeal of the implementation of the Mount Shasta EIFD. Administration costs shall also include amounts estimated or advanced by the City for any other administrative purposes, including, but not limited to, attorney’s fees or any other expenses incidental to the implementation of the Mount Shasta EIFD.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 112 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 11
Targeted improvements would conform to established guidelines in adopted planning documentation, such as the City General Plan.
The PFA intends to continue to identify, evaluate, and pursue additional funding sources and financing mechanisms aside from District tax increment to implement the improvements identified above, potentially including grant sources, complementary district formation (e.g., Mello-Roos Community Facilities District), impact fees, private sector investment incentivized by the formation of the Mount Shasta EIFD itself, and/or other sources.
Private sector developers will be responsible for funding project-specific / fair-share / in-tract infrastructure. Some public facilities included in the Mount Shasta EIFD area are anticipated to be provided by governmental entities without assistance from the District. There are no public facilities anticipated to be provided jointly by the private sector and governmental entities; however, it is possible that private sector developers may advance funding for improvements, and those advances may be partially reimbursed with EIFD proceeds. Such case-specific agreements would come before the PFA for approval at the appropriate time.
In accordance with Government Code Section 53398.69, the Mount Shasta EIFD may expend up to 10 percent of any accrued tax increment in the first two years of the effective date of the Mount Shasta EIFD on planning and dissemination of information to the residents within the Mount Shasta EIFD boundaries about the IFP and planned activities to be funded by the Mount Shasta EIFD, including reimbursement of the City’s advanced funding of such eligible costs.
In addition, in accordance with Government Code Section 53398.76, costs incurred by the County of Siskiyou in connection with the division of taxes for the Mount Shasta EIFD are eligible to be paid by the Mount Shasta EIFD.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 113 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 12
4.0 Finding of Communitywide
Significance
Implementation of the District promotes the goals of and is consistent with the City’s General Plan, serves as a catalyst for private sector investment and critical public infrastructure with transformative potential for the Mount Shasta EIFD area and the City as a whole. The District supports job creation, housing production, improvement of quality of life, and promotion of environmental sustainability.
Specific communitywide and regional benefits anticipated to be generated by the District include:
• Approx. $11.8 million in net fiscal impact to the City over 50 years (on a present-value basis)
• 200+ housing units within and around the District upon buildout and stabilization • 1,200+ direct, indirect, and induced temporary, construction-related jobs in the City and County
• 200+ direct, permanent jobs in the City and County upon buildout and stabilization • 40 additional indirect and induced permanent jobs in the City and County (total of 240+ direct, indirect, and induced jobs) upon buildout and stabilization • $117 million in economic output from construction in the City and County • $22 million in annual ongoing economic output in the City and County upon buildout and stabilization.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 114 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 13
5.0 Financing Section
Projections included in this IFP are based on research and analysis of available data at the time of IFP for purposes of planning and illustration. Actual results may differ from those expressed in this document.
Aside from the City, no other taxing entity is allocating property tax increment to the District at this time. It is anticipated that property tax increment will be utilized on both a “pay-as-you-go” basis as well as security for tax increment bond issuance or loan acquisition.
Definition of Tax Increment. For purposes of clarity, the phrases “tax increment,” “incremental property tax” and “incremental tax revenue”, as used in this IFP and the EIFD Law, refer to the portion of future property tax revenue described in the EIFD Law, i.e., the difference between (A) and (B) in the following formula:
(A) the taxes that would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year during the term of the Mount Shasta EIFD upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the EIFD in each such year minus
(B) the taxes that would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Mount Shasta EIFD as of the “base year” established by the resolution adopted pursuant to Section 53398.69 of the EIFD Law to create the Mount Shasta EIFD.
In the case of the Mount Shasta EIFD, the resolution adopted pursuant to Section 53398.69 is expected to be adopted prior to December 2024, establishing Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as the base year. The assessed value of the taxable property is estimated to be approximately $10 million for purposes of IFP projections, which is referred to as the “base year value”.
5.1 Maximum Portion of Incremental Tax Revenue Dedicated to the District Table 3 details the maximum portion of the incremental property tax revenue of the City proposed to be committed to the District throughout the duration of the District lifetime. The maximum portion of the City’s property tax increment to be committed to the District is 50% over the District lifetime. This includes a proportional share of the City’s incremental growth in property tax in lieu of motor vehicle license fees (“MVLF”).
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 115 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 14
5.2 Projection of District Tax Revenues by Year
Table 3 provides an overview of the projected growth of assessed value, property tax increment, and City allocations to the District over the District lifetime. It is expected that a total of approximately $4.7 million of incremental tax revenues will be allocated to the District over the District lifetime. These projections are based on research and analysis of available data at the time of IFP preparation for purposes of illustration. Actual results may differ from those expressed in this document. Appendix C provides additional detail for the projected revenue analysis.
5.3 Plan for Financing Public Facilities
The PFA intends to utilize numerous funding sources and financing mechanisms to implement the improvements identified in Section 3.2, potentially including District tax increment, grant sources, complementary district formation (e.g., Community Facilities District), impact fees, private sector investment incentivized by the formation of the Mount Shasta EIFD itself, and/or other sources.
Section 5.4 of this IFP includes a plan for financing the public facilities to be assisted by the District. The PFA intends to incur debt or other forms of financial obligations only when it is financially prudent to do so. It is estimated at this time that the Mount Shasta EIFD will provide funding for approximately $2 million (in present value dollars) of public improvement costs. While issuance of EIFD bonds may not be financially feasible, the PFA could pursue a partnership with one or more interested private sector developers, who may be willing to advance funding for infrastructure improvements and be reimbursed from EIFD revenues as they become available.
5.4 Limit on Total Dollars Allocated to the District
The total number of dollars of taxes that may be allocated to the District shall not exceed $12,000,000 over the District lifetime.
5.5 District Termination Date
The District will cease to exist the earlier of: (i) forty five (45) years from the date on which the issuance of bonds is approved by the PFA (not anticipated to be a likely scenario), or (ii) June 30, 2076. This IFP assumes that the District will be formed in calendar year 2024, setting Fiscal Year 2025-2026 as the base year for the EIFD, with Fiscal Year 2026-2027 anticipated as the first year of EIFD revenues.
5.6 Analysis of Costs to Provide Facilities and Services Appendix D to this IFP includes, as part of the Fiscal Impact Analysis, an analysis of the costs to the City for providing facilities and services to the area of the District while the area is being developed and after the area is developed. It is estimated that, at Year 15 of the District lifetime (assumed stabilized buildout of District area), annual costs to the City will be approximately $796,000 million to service the area of the District.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 116 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 15
5.7 Fiscal Impact Analysis
Appendix D to this IFP includes an analysis of the projected fiscal impact of the District and the associated development upon the City, as the only affected taxing entity that is allocating tax increment revenues to the District. Table 4 presents an overview of fiscal impacts to the City. It is estimated that, at Year 15 of the District lifetime, the District area will generate an annual net fiscal surplus of approximately $420,000 to the City. Over 50 years, it is estimated that District activity will generate a positive net fiscal impact of approximately $11.8 million for the City on a present-value basis. This is in addition to the Community economic benefits outlined in Section 4 of this IFP (e.g., housing, jobs, mobility and connectivity, quality of life, environmental sustainability).
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 117 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 16
Table 3: Projection of District Revenues by Year
Incremental
Assessed Value
Property Tax
Increment @
1% General
Levy
Average City
Share
Available
City
Increment
Available
Portion of
City Share
Allocated
City
Increment
Allocated
Average City
Share
Available
City
Increment
Available
Portion of
City Share
Allocated
City
Increment
Allocated
Total Taxes
Allocated to
EIFD
0 2025 / 2026 $0 $0 6.68% $0 50% $0 8.10% $0 50% $0 $0
1 2026 / 2027 $198,000 $1,980 6.68% $132 50% $66 8.10% $160 50% $80 $146 2 2027 / 2028 $4,561,560 $45,616 6.68% $3,049 50% $1,525 8.10% $3,695 50% $1,848 $3,372 3 2028 / 2029 $9,095,623 $90,956 6.68% $6,080 50% $3,040 8.10% $7,369 50% $3,684 $6,724 4 2029 / 2030 $32,747,827 $327,478 6.68% $21,891 50% $10,946 8.10% $26,530 50% $13,265 $24,211 5 2030 / 2031 $40,225,268 $402,253 6.68% $26,890 50% $13,445 8.10% $32,588 50% $16,294 $29,739 6 2031 / 2032 $47,492,052 $474,921 6.68% $31,748 50% $15,874 8.10% $38,475 50% $19,237 $35,111 7 2032 / 2033 $61,849,779 $618,498 6.68% $41,346 50% $20,673 8.10% $50,106 50% $25,053 $45,726 8 2033 / 2034 $70,900,560 $709,006 6.68% $47,396 50% $23,698 8.10% $57,438 50% $28,719 $52,417 9 2034 / 2035 $77,296,942 $772,969 6.68% $51,672 50% $25,836 8.10% $62,620 50% $31,310 $57,146 10 2035 / 2036 $85,821,537 $858,215 6.68% $57,371 50% $28,685 8.10% $69,526 50% $34,763 $63,448 11 2036 / 2037 $95,040,792 $950,408 6.68% $63,533 50% $31,767 8.10% $76,995 50% $38,498 $70,264 12 2037 / 2038 $97,139,607 $971,396 6.68% $64,936 50% $32,468 8.10% $78,695 50% $39,348 $71,816 13 2038 / 2039 $99,280,400 $992,804 6.68% $66,368 50% $33,184 8.10% $80,430 50% $40,215 $73,399 14 2039 / 2040 $101,464,008 $1,014,640 6.68% $67,827 50% $33,914 8.10% $82,199 50% $41,099 $75,013 15 2040 / 2041 $103,691,288 $1,036,913 6.68% $69,316 50% $34,658 8.10% $84,003 50% $42,002 $76,660 16 2041 / 2042 $105,963,114 $1,059,631 6.68% $70,835 50% $35,417 8.10% $85,844 50% $42,922 $78,339 17 2042 / 2043 $108,280,376 $1,082,804 6.68% $72,384 50% $36,192 8.10% $87,721 50% $43,860 $80,052 18 2043 / 2044 $110,643,983 $1,106,440 6.68% $73,964 50% $36,982 8.10% $89,636 50% $44,818 $81,800 19 2044 / 2045 $113,054,863 $1,130,549 6.68% $75,576 50% $37,788 8.10% $91,589 50% $45,794 $83,582 20 2045 / 2046 $115,513,960 $1,155,140 6.68% $77,219 50% $38,610 8.10% $93,581 50% $46,790 $85,400 21 2046 / 2047 $118,022,239 $1,180,222 6.68% $78,896 50% $39,448 8.10% $95,613 50% $47,807 $87,255 22 2047 / 2048 $120,580,684 $1,205,807 6.68% $80,607 50% $40,303 8.10% $97,686 50% $48,843 $89,146 23 2048 / 2049 $123,190,298 $1,231,903 6.68% $82,351 50% $41,176 8.10% $99,800 50% $49,900 $91,075 24 2049 / 2050 $125,852,104 $1,258,521 6.68% $84,130 50% $42,065 8.10% $101,956 50% $50,978 $93,043 25 2050 / 2051 $128,567,146 $1,285,671 6.68% $85,945 50% $42,973 8.10% $104,156 50% $52,078 $95,051 26 2051 / 2052 $131,336,489 $1,313,365 6.68% $87,797 50% $43,898 8.10% $106,399 50% $53,200 $97,098 27 2052 / 2053 $134,161,219 $1,341,612 6.68% $89,685 50% $44,842 8.10% $108,688 50% $54,344 $99,186 28 2053 / 2054 $137,042,443 $1,370,424 6.68% $91,611 50% $45,805 8.10% $111,022 50% $55,511 $101,316 29 2054 / 2055 $139,981,292 $1,399,813 6.68% $93,576 50% $46,788 8.10% $113,403 50% $56,701 $103,489 30 2055 / 2056 $142,978,918 $1,429,789 6.68% $95,579 50% $47,790 8.10% $115,831 50% $57,916 $105,705 31 2056 / 2057 $146,036,496 $1,460,365 6.68% $97,623 50% $48,812 8.10% $118,308 50% $59,154 $107,966 32 2057 / 2058 $149,155,226 $1,491,552 6.68% $99,708 50% $49,854 8.10% $120,835 50% $60,417 $110,271 33 2058 / 2059 $152,336,330 $1,523,363 6.68% $101,835 50% $50,917 8.10% $123,412 50% $61,706 $112,623 34 2059 / 2060 $155,581,057 $1,555,811 6.68% $104,004 50% $52,002 8.10% $126,040 50% $63,020 $115,022 35 2060 / 2061 $158,890,678 $1,588,907 6.68% $106,216 50% $53,108 8.10% $128,722 50% $64,361 $117,469 36 2061 / 2062 $162,266,492 $1,622,665 6.68% $108,473 50% $54,236 8.10% $131,456 50% $65,728 $119,965 37 2062 / 2063 $165,709,822 $1,657,098 6.68% $110,775 50% $55,387 8.10% $134,246 50% $67,123 $122,510 38 2063 / 2064 $169,222,018 $1,692,220 6.68% $113,123 50% $56,561 8.10% $137,091 50% $68,546 $125,107 39 2064 / 2065 $172,804,458 $1,728,045 6.68% $115,517 50% $57,759 8.10% $139,994 50% $69,997 $127,755 40 2065 / 2066 $176,458,548 $1,764,585 6.68% $117,960 50% $58,980 8.10% $142,954 50% $71,477 $130,457 41 2066 / 2067 $180,185,719 $1,801,857 6.68% $120,452 50% $60,226 8.10% $145,973 50% $72,987 $133,212 42 2067 / 2068 $183,987,433 $1,839,874 6.68% $122,993 50% $61,497 8.10% $149,053 50% $74,527 $136,023 43 2068 / 2069 $187,865,182 $1,878,652 6.68% $125,585 50% $62,793 8.10% $152,195 50% $76,097 $138,890 44 2069 / 2070 $191,820,485 $1,918,205 6.68% $128,229 50% $64,115 8.10% $155,399 50% $77,699 $141,814 45 2070 / 2071 $195,854,895 $1,958,549 6.68% $130,926 50% $65,463 8.10% $158,667 50% $79,334 $144,797 46 2071 / 2072 $199,969,993 $1,999,700 6.68% $133,677 50% $66,839 8.10% $162,001 50% $81,001 $147,839 47 2072 / 2073 $204,167,393 $2,041,674 6.68% $136,483 50% $68,242 8.10% $165,402 50% $82,701 $150,942 48 2073 / 2074 $208,448,741 $2,084,487 6.68% $139,345 50% $69,673 8.10% $168,870 50% $84,435 $154,108 49 2074 / 2075 $212,815,715 $2,128,157 6.68% $142,264 50% $71,132 8.10% $172,408 50% $86,204 $157,336 50 2075 / 2076 $217,270,030 $2,172,700 6.68% $145,242 50% $72,621 8.10% $176,016 50% $88,008 $160,629 $63,728,211 $4,260,142 50% $2,130,071 $5,162,794 50% $2,581,397 $4,711,468 $26,985,017 $1,803,911 50% $901,955 $2,186,129 50% $1,093,065 $1,995,020 City Share of AB8 Property Taxes City Equivalent Share of MVLF Property Taxes Fiscal Year
Total
Present Value @ 3%
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 118 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 17
Table 4: Overview of Fiscal Impacts to City
5.8 Developer Reimbursement for Transit Priority Project The PFA does not intend to finance any potential costs that may be incurred by reimbursing a developer of a project that is both located entirely within the boundaries of the District and qualifies for the Transit Priority Project Program, pursuant to Section 65470. To the extent that a developer is willing to fund Transit Priority Project infrastructure expenditures beyond and in advance of said developer’s fair share (not contemplated at this time), the PFA may consider and evaluate such reimbursement at the appropriate time.
Annual
(Stablized
Year 15)
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value
@ 3.0%
City of Mount Shasta
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of EIFD Allocation) $1,216,000 $85,605,200 $33,940,500 Estimated Fiscal Expenditures ($796,000) ($56,225,800) ($22,101,600) Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to City $420,000 $29,379,400 $11,838,900 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 119 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 18
6.0 Removal of Dwelling Units and
Replacement Housing Plan
The PFA does not anticipate that any housing units will be removed as a result of any public works construction within the area of the District or private development within the area of the District that is subject to a written agreement with the District or that is financed in whole or in part by the District. However, if any relocation of dwelling units is deemed to be required in the future for a project financed by the District, the PFA will comply with the requirements of Government Code Section 53398.56.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 120 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 19
7.0 Goals of the District
As stated in the Resolution of Intention, the goal of the Mount Shasta EIFD is to assist in the provision of public facilities of communitywide significance that provide significant benefits and promote economic development within the boundaries of the Mount Shasta EIFD and the surrounding community and, for those facilities located outside the Mount Shasta EIFD boundaries which also have a tangible connection to the Mount Shasta EIFD.
More specifically, the goals of the District’s implementation of the public facilities outlined in Section 3.2 are to support the City’s General Plan and serve as a catalyst for private sector investment and critical public infrastructure with transformative potential for the Mount Shasta EIFD area and the City as a whole. The District additionally aims to implement Statewide policy goals of housing supply and sustainable infrastructure investment.
Additional objectives include economic development in the form of fiscal revenue generation for the City and other taxing entities, job creation, housing production, improvement of quality of life, and promotion of environmental sustainability. The District will be utilized to address critical infrastructure funding needs, which are are critical to catalyze private sector investment and development.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 121 Mount Shasta EIFD
Infrastructure
Financing Plan Nov 4
2024 Page 20
8.0 Appendices
Appendix A: Map of Boundaries of the Mount Shasta EIFD
Appendix B: Legal Description of the Mount Shasta EIFD
Appendix C: Projected Tax Increment Revenue Analysis
Appendix D: Fiscal Impact Analysis
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 122 Appendix A to IFP
Mount Shasta EIFD Map DRAFT
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 123 Appendix B to IFP - EIFD Parcel List
037-060-030-000 057-781-070-000
037-060-040-000 057-781-160-000
037-060-050-000 057-781-160-000
037-060-060-000 057-781-180-000
037-070-060-000 057-781-190-000
037-070-070-000 057-781-200-000
037-070-080-000 057-781-210-000
037-070-090-000 057-781-220-000
037-070-210-000 057-781-230-000
037-140-020-000 057-781-240-000
037-140-110-000 057-781-250-000
037-160-010-000 057-781-260-000
037-160-020-000 057-791-010-000
037-160-030-000 057-791-020-000
037-220-030-000 057-791-020-000
037-220-050-000 057-791-030-000
057-241-030-000 057-801-010-000
057-241-120-000 057-801-150-000
057-241-130-000 057-811-190-000
057-241-430-000 057-821-370-000
057-241-470-000 057-821-480-000
057-621-010-000 067-010-010-000
057-621-030-000 067-010-020-000
057-771-020-000 067-010-140-000
057-771-030-000 067-010-150-000
057-771-070-000 067-010-160-000
057-771-080-000 067-010-170-000
057-771-110-000
057-771-120-000
057-771-150-000
057-771-160-000
057-771-170-000
057-771-180-000
057-771-200-000
057-771-250-000
057-771-260-000
057-771-270-000
057-771-280-000
057-771-340-000
057-771-360-000
057-771-370-000
057-771-380-000
057-771-390-000
057-771-400-000
057-781-020-000
057-781-040-000
057-781-060-000
6/13/2024
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024
124
Appendix C to the IFP - EIFD Tax Increment Projections DRAFT 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Total 2025-2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033
Construction inflator >>> 1.000 1.020 1.040 1.061 1.082 1.104 1.126 1.149 New Development
Market-Rate Residential 160 units 16 units 16 units 16 units 16 units 16 units 16 units $250,000 per unit $45,568,359 $4,161,600 $4,244,832 $4,329,729 $4,416,323 $4,504,650 $4,594,743 Affordable Residential 40 units 4 units 4 units 4 units 4 units 4 units 4 units $0 per unit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF 10,000 SF
$250 PSF $7,966,556 $2,706,080
Office 10,000 SF 10,000 SF
$200 PSF $2,208,162 $2,208,162
Hotel 75 units 75 units
$200,000 per unit $16,236,482 $16,236,482
Hostel 75 units 75 units
$100,000 per unit $8,615,143 $8,615,143
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF 12,500 SF
$125 PSF $3,664,308 $1,759,629
Subtotal Value Add $84,259,009 $0 $4,161,600 $4,244,832 $23,272,291 $6,624,485 $6,264,278 $13,209,885 Total Assessed Value $9,900,000 $10,098,000 $14,461,560 $18,995,623 $42,647,827 $50,125,268 $57,392,052 $71,749,779 Incremental AV $198,000 $4,561,560 $9,095,623 $32,747,827 $40,225,268 $47,492,052 $61,849,779 Total tax increment @ 1% $1,980 $45,616 $90,956 $327,478 $402,253 $474,921 $618,498 City Share Available 6.68% $4,260,142 $132 $3,049 $6,080 $21,891 $26,890 $31,748 $41,346 Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,130,071 $66 $1,525 $3,040 $10,946 $13,445 $15,874 $20,673 City MVLF Equivalent Share Available 8.10% $5,162,794 $160 $3,695 $7,369 $26,530 $32,588 $38,475 $50,106 Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,581,397 $80 $1,848 $3,684 $13,265 $16,294 $19,237 $25,053 Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $4,711,468 $146 $3,372 $6,724 $24,211 $29,739 $35,111 $45,726 6/13/2024 Page 1 of 7
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 125 Appendix C to the IFP - EIFD Tax Increment Projections DRAFT Total
Construction inflator >>>
New Development
Market-Rate Residential 160 units
$250,000 per unit $45,568,359
Affordable Residential 40 units
$0 per unit $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF
$250 PSF $7,966,556
Office 10,000 SF
$200 PSF $2,208,162
Hotel 75 units
$200,000 per unit $16,236,482
Hostel 75 units
$100,000 per unit $8,615,143
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF
$125 PSF $3,664,308
Subtotal Value Add $84,259,009
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 6.68% $4,260,142
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,130,071
City MVLF Equivalent Share Available 8.10% $5,162,794
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,581,397
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $4,711,468
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041
1.172 1.195 1.219 1.243 1.268 1.294 1.319 1.346
16 units 16 units 16 units 16 units
$4,686,638 $4,780,370 $4,875,978 $4,973,497
4 units 4 units 4 units 4 units
$0 $0 $0 $0
10,000 SF 7,500 SF
$2,929,148 $2,331,327
12,500 SF
$1,904,679
$7,615,786 $4,780,370 $6,780,656 $7,304,824 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,800,560 $87,196,942 $95,721,537 $104,940,792 $107,039,607 $109,180,400 $111,364,008 $113,591,288 $70,900,560 $77,296,942 $85,821,537 $95,040,792 $97,139,607 $99,280,400 $101,464,008 $103,691,288 $709,006 $772,969 $858,215 $950,408 $971,396 $992,804 $1,014,640 $1,036,913 $47,396 $51,672 $57,371 $63,533 $64,936 $66,368 $67,827 $69,316 $23,698 $25,836 $28,685 $31,767 $32,468 $33,184 $33,914 $34,658 $57,438 $62,620 $69,526 $76,995 $78,695 $80,430 $82,199 $84,003 $28,719 $31,310 $34,763 $38,498 $39,348 $40,215 $41,099 $42,002 $52,417 $57,146 $63,448 $70,264 $71,816 $73,399 $75,013 $76,660 6/13/2024 Page 2 of 7
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 126 Appendix C to the IFP - EIFD Tax Increment Projections DRAFT Total
Construction inflator >>>
New Development
Market-Rate Residential 160 units
$250,000 per unit $45,568,359
Affordable Residential 40 units
$0 per unit $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF
$250 PSF $7,966,556
Office 10,000 SF
$200 PSF $2,208,162
Hotel 75 units
$200,000 per unit $16,236,482
Hostel 75 units
$100,000 per unit $8,615,143
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF
$125 PSF $3,664,308
Subtotal Value Add $84,259,009
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 6.68% $4,260,142
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,130,071
City MVLF Equivalent Share Available 8.10% $5,162,794
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,581,397
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $4,711,468
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049
1.373 1.400 1.428 1.457 1.486 1.516 1.546 1.577
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$115,863,114 $118,180,376 $120,543,983 $122,954,863 $125,413,960 $127,922,239 $130,480,684 $133,090,298 $105,963,114 $108,280,376 $110,643,983 $113,054,863 $115,513,960 $118,022,239 $120,580,684 $123,190,298 $1,059,631 $1,082,804 $1,106,440 $1,130,549 $1,155,140 $1,180,222 $1,205,807 $1,231,903 $70,835 $72,384 $73,964 $75,576 $77,219 $78,896 $80,607 $82,351 $35,417 $36,192 $36,982 $37,788 $38,610 $39,448 $40,303 $41,176 $85,844 $87,721 $89,636 $91,589 $93,581 $95,613 $97,686 $99,800 $42,922 $43,860 $44,818 $45,794 $46,790 $47,807 $48,843 $49,900 $78,339 $80,052 $81,800 $83,582 $85,400 $87,255 $89,146 $91,075 6/13/2024 Page 3 of 7
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 127 Appendix C to the IFP - EIFD Tax Increment Projections DRAFT Total
Construction inflator >>>
New Development
Market-Rate Residential 160 units
$250,000 per unit $45,568,359
Affordable Residential 40 units
$0 per unit $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF
$250 PSF $7,966,556
Office 10,000 SF
$200 PSF $2,208,162
Hotel 75 units
$200,000 per unit $16,236,482
Hostel 75 units
$100,000 per unit $8,615,143
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF
$125 PSF $3,664,308
Subtotal Value Add $84,259,009
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 6.68% $4,260,142
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,130,071
City MVLF Equivalent Share Available 8.10% $5,162,794
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,581,397
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $4,711,468
24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057
1.608 1.641 1.673 1.707 1.741 1.776 1.811 1.848
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$135,752,104 $138,467,146 $141,236,489 $144,061,219 $146,942,443 $149,881,292 $152,878,918 $155,936,496 $125,852,104 $128,567,146 $131,336,489 $134,161,219 $137,042,443 $139,981,292 $142,978,918 $146,036,496 $1,258,521 $1,285,671 $1,313,365 $1,341,612 $1,370,424 $1,399,813 $1,429,789 $1,460,365 $84,130 $85,945 $87,797 $89,685 $91,611 $93,576 $95,579 $97,623 $42,065 $42,973 $43,898 $44,842 $45,805 $46,788 $47,790 $48,812 $101,956 $104,156 $106,399 $108,688 $111,022 $113,403 $115,831 $118,308 $50,978 $52,078 $53,200 $54,344 $55,511 $56,701 $57,916 $59,154 $93,043 $95,051 $97,098 $99,186 $101,316 $103,489 $105,705 $107,966 6/13/2024 Page 4 of 7
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 128 Appendix C to the IFP - EIFD Tax Increment Projections DRAFT Total
Construction inflator >>>
New Development
Market-Rate Residential 160 units
$250,000 per unit $45,568,359
Affordable Residential 40 units
$0 per unit $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF
$250 PSF $7,966,556
Office 10,000 SF
$200 PSF $2,208,162
Hotel 75 units
$200,000 per unit $16,236,482
Hostel 75 units
$100,000 per unit $8,615,143
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF
$125 PSF $3,664,308
Subtotal Value Add $84,259,009
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 6.68% $4,260,142
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,130,071
City MVLF Equivalent Share Available 8.10% $5,162,794
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,581,397
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $4,711,468
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065
1.885 1.922 1.961 2.000 2.040 2.081 2.122 2.165
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$159,055,226 $162,236,330 $165,481,057 $168,790,678 $172,166,492 $175,609,822 $179,122,018 $182,704,458 $149,155,226 $152,336,330 $155,581,057 $158,890,678 $162,266,492 $165,709,822 $169,222,018 $172,804,458 $1,491,552 $1,523,363 $1,555,811 $1,588,907 $1,622,665 $1,657,098 $1,692,220 $1,728,045 $99,708 $101,835 $104,004 $106,216 $108,473 $110,775 $113,123 $115,517 $49,854 $50,917 $52,002 $53,108 $54,236 $55,387 $56,561 $57,759 $120,835 $123,412 $126,040 $128,722 $131,456 $134,246 $137,091 $139,994 $60,417 $61,706 $63,020 $64,361 $65,728 $67,123 $68,546 $69,997 $110,271 $112,623 $115,022 $117,469 $119,965 $122,510 $125,107 $127,755 6/13/2024 Page 5 of 7
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 129 Appendix C to the IFP - EIFD Tax Increment Projections DRAFT Total
Construction inflator >>>
New Development
Market-Rate Residential 160 units
$250,000 per unit $45,568,359
Affordable Residential 40 units
$0 per unit $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF
$250 PSF $7,966,556
Office 10,000 SF
$200 PSF $2,208,162
Hotel 75 units
$200,000 per unit $16,236,482
Hostel 75 units
$100,000 per unit $8,615,143
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF
$125 PSF $3,664,308
Subtotal Value Add $84,259,009
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 6.68% $4,260,142
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,130,071
City MVLF Equivalent Share Available 8.10% $5,162,794
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,581,397
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $4,711,468
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073
2.208 2.252 2.297 2.343 2.390 2.438 2.487 2.536
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$186,358,548 $190,085,719 $193,887,433 $197,765,182 $201,720,485 $205,754,895 $209,869,993 $214,067,393 $176,458,548 $180,185,719 $183,987,433 $187,865,182 $191,820,485 $195,854,895 $199,969,993 $204,167,393 $1,764,585 $1,801,857 $1,839,874 $1,878,652 $1,918,205 $1,958,549 $1,999,700 $2,041,674 $117,960 $120,452 $122,993 $125,585 $128,229 $130,926 $133,677 $136,483 $58,980 $60,226 $61,497 $62,793 $64,115 $65,463 $66,839 $68,242 $142,954 $145,973 $149,053 $152,195 $155,399 $158,667 $162,001 $165,402 $71,477 $72,987 $74,527 $76,097 $77,699 $79,334 $81,001 $82,701 $130,457 $133,212 $136,023 $138,890 $141,814 $144,797 $147,839 $150,942 6/13/2024 Page 6 of 7
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 130 Appendix C to the IFP - EIFD Tax Increment Projections DRAFT Total
Construction inflator >>>
New Development
Market-Rate Residential 160 units
$250,000 per unit $45,568,359
Affordable Residential 40 units
$0 per unit $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF
$250 PSF $7,966,556
Office 10,000 SF
$200 PSF $2,208,162
Hotel 75 units
$200,000 per unit $16,236,482
Hostel 75 units
$100,000 per unit $8,615,143
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF
$125 PSF $3,664,308
Subtotal Value Add $84,259,009
Total Assessed Value
Incremental AV
Total tax increment @ 1%
City Share Available 6.68% $4,260,142
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,130,071
City MVLF Equivalent Share Available 8.10% $5,162,794
Amount Allocated to EIFD 50% $2,581,397
Total Revenues Allocated to EIFD $4,711,468
48 49 50
2074 2075 2076
2.587 2.639 2.692
$0 $0 $0
$218,348,741 $222,715,715 $227,170,030
$208,448,741 $212,815,715 $217,270,030
$2,084,487 $2,128,157 $2,172,700
$139,345 $142,264 $145,242
$69,673 $71,132 $72,621
$168,870 $172,408 $176,016
$84,435 $86,204 $88,008
$154,108 $157,336 $160,629
6/13/2024 Page 7 of 7
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 131 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Overview of Fiscal Impacts Key Land Use Assumptions (Stabilized Year 15) Annual
(Stablized
Year 15)
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value
@ 3.0%
City of Mount Shasta Market-Rate Residential 160 DU
Estimated Fiscal Revenues (Net of EIFD Allocation) $1,216,000 $85,605,200 $33,940,500 Affordable Housing 40 DU Estimated Fiscal Expenditures ($796,000) ($56,225,800) ($22,101,600) Hotel 75 rooms Estimated Net Fiscal Impact to City $420,000 $29,379,400 $11,838,900 Hostel 75 rooms Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF
Office / Flex 10,000 SF
Industrial 25,000 SF
Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure Values in 2024 dollars
Project Component
6/13/2024 Page 1 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 132 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Summary of Estimated Fiscal Impacts to City Stablized
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15 Year 20 Year 25 Year 30 Year 40 Year 50 2031 2036 2041 2046 2051 2056 2066 2076
Stabilized
Escalation
Rate
Year 0-50
Nominal
Total
Year 0-50
Present Value @
3.0%
City of Mount Shasta Revenues
Property Tax $27,600 $58,600 $70,100 $77,400 $85,500 $94,400 $115,073 $140,273 2.0% $4,207,700 $1,741,700 Property Tax Allocation to EIFD ($13,800) ($29,300) ($35,100) ($38,700) ($42,700) ($47,200) ($57,537) ($70,137) 2.0% ($2,103,900) ($870,800) Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF $31,800 $67,800 $81,200 $89,700 $99,000 $109,300 $133,236 $162,414 2.0% $4,871,500 $2,016,200 Property Tax in-lieu of MVLF Allocation to EIFD ($15,900) ($33,900) ($40,600) ($44,850) ($49,500) ($54,650) ($66,618) ($81,207) 2.0% ($2,435,800) ($1,008,100) Property Transfer Tax $1,100 $2,300 $2,800 $3,100 $3,400 $3,700 $4,510 $5,498 2.0% $165,900 $68,800 Bradley-Burns Sales and Use Tax - Direct / On-Site $29,200 $67,700 $108,000 $125,200 $145,100 $168,200 $226,047 $303,788 3.0% $7,548,900 $2,935,900 Bradley-Burns Sales and Use Tax - Indirect / Off-Site $20,200 $58,900 $72,400 $83,900 $97,300 $112,800 $151,594 $203,729 3.0% $5,124,900 $2,017,000 Transient Occupancy Tax $289,600 $671,400 $778,400 $902,300 $1,046,000 $1,212,600 $1,629,633 $2,190,090 3.0% $55,582,400 $22,069,100 Business License Tax $5,000 $11,000 $14,000 $16,300 $18,900 $21,900 $29,432 $39,554 3.0% $994,800 $391,600 Cannabis Related Taxes $8,400 $21,000 $26,900 $31,200 $36,200 $42,000 $56,444 $75,857 3.0% $1,903,500 $748,100 Fines & Forfeitures $400 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,700 $1,900 $2,553 $3,432 3.0% $86,600 $34,100 Franchise Tax $5,000 $12,400 $15,900 $18,400 $21,400 $24,800 $33,329 $44,792 3.0% $1,124,400 $441,900 Interest & Rental Revenues $200 $600 $800 $900 $1,000 $1,200 $1,613 $2,167 3.0% $54,000 $21,200 Current Service Charges $300 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $2,150 $2,890 3.0% $72,400 $28,400 Administrative Allocation $17,500 $43,800 $56,300 $65,300 $75,700 $87,700 $117,861 $158,396 3.0% $3,976,900 $1,563,400 Transfers In $6,800 $16,900 $21,700 $25,100 $29,100 $33,800 $45,424 $61,047 3.0% $1,532,500 $602,400 Other Misc. Revenues $12,800 $32,000 $41,000 $47,600 $55,200 $63,900 $85,876 $115,411 3.0% $2,898,500 $1,139,600 Estimated Total Revenues $426,200 $1,003,000 $1,216,000 $1,405,450 $1,624,700 $1,877,950 $2,510,622 $3,357,993 $85,605,200 $33,940,500 City of Mount Shasta Expenditures
Legislative $1,600 $4,000 $5,200 $6,000 $7,000 $8,100 $10,886 $14,630 3.0% $367,300 $144,400 Administration & Finance $47,200 $118,100 $151,600 $175,800 $203,700 $236,200 $317,433 $426,603 3.0% $10,709,900 $4,209,900 Public Safety - Police & Fire $123,400 $308,700 $396,500 $459,600 $532,900 $617,700 $830,137 $1,115,635 3.0% $28,008,100 $11,009,500 Buildings & Operations $50,700 $126,900 $163,000 $189,000 $219,100 $253,900 $341,220 $458,572 3.0% $11,513,200 $4,525,800 Public Works Dept. $24,800 $62,000 $79,700 $92,400 $107,100 $124,100 $166,780 $224,138 3.0% $5,627,300 $2,212,000 Estimated Total Expenditures $247,700 $619,700 $796,000 $922,800 $1,069,800 $1,240,000 $1,666,456 $2,239,578 $56,225,800 $22,101,600 Estimated Annual Net Fiscal Impact $178,500 $383,300 $420,000 $482,650 $554,900 $637,950 $844,166 $1,118,415 $29,379,400 $11,838,900 Revenue / Expenditure Ratio 1.72 1.62 1.53 1.52 1.52 1.51 1.51 1.50 1.52 1.54 Notes:
Assumes installation of necessary public infrastructure Values in 2024 dollars
Select years shown for illustration
6/13/2024 Page 2 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 133 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Project Description
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
Project Component 2031 2036 2041
Market-Rate Residential 64 DU 144 DU 160 DU
Affordable Housing 16 DU 36 DU 40 DU
Total Residential 80 DU 180 DU 200 DU
Hotel 75 rooms 75 rooms 75 rooms
Hostel 0 rooms 75 rooms 75 rooms
Commercial / Retail 10,000 SF 20,000 SF 27,500 SF
Office / Flex 10,000 SF 10,000 SF 10,000 SF
Industrial 0 SF 25,000 SF 25,000 SF
Annual Escalation Factor 2.0% 1.10 1.22 1.35
Estimated A/V - Market Residential $250K Per Unit $17,665,293 $43,883,799 $53,834,734 Estimated A/V - Affordable Housing $0K Per Unit $0 $0 $0 Estimated A/V - Hotel $200K Per Room $16,561,212 $18,284,916 $20,188,025 Estimated A/V - Hostel $100K Per Room $0 $9,142,458 $10,094,013 Estimated A/V - Commercial / Retail $250 PSF $2,760,202 $6,094,972 $9,252,845 Estimated A/V - Office / Flex $200 PSF $2,208,162 $2,437,989 $2,691,737 Estimated A/V - Industrial $125 PSF $0 $3,809,358 $4,205,839 Total Estimated Assessed Value $39,194,869 $83,653,492 $100,267,191 Notes:
Adjusted for value appreciation assuming 2% annual escalation rate (statuatory maximum).
Conservatively assuming no mark-to-market valuations above 2% growth to account for property transfers Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2024 dollars
6/13/2024 Page 3 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 134 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Project Employment and Occupants
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
Project Component 2031 2036 2041
Market-Rate Residential 64 DU 144 DU 160 DU
Affordable Housing 16 DU 36 DU 40 DU
Hotel 75 Rooms 75 Rooms 75 Rooms
Hostel 0 Rooms 75 Rooms 75 Rooms
Commercial / Retail 10,000 SF 20,000 SF 27,500 SF
Office / Flex 10,000 SF 10,000 SF 10,000 SF
Industrial 0 SF 25,000 SF 25,000 SF
Estimated # Employees (FTE)
Market-Rate Residential 50 DU / emp 1 3 3
Affordable Housing 50 DU / emp 0 1 1
Hotel 1.5 room / emp 50 50 50
Hostel 1.5 room / emp 0 50 50
Commercial / Retail 400 SF / emp 25 50 69
Office / Flex 350 SF / emp 29 29 29
Industrial 1,500 SF / emp 0 17 17
Total Estimated # Employees (FTE) 105 199 218
Occupied Dwelling Units 95% 76 DU 171 DU 190 DU
Residents 2.00 per DU 152 342 380
Employees Weighted at 50% 50% 53 99 109
Total Service Population (Residents + Empl.) 205 441 489 Occupied Hotel Rooms 75% 56 rooms 56 rooms 56 rooms
Hotel Guests 1.5 per room 84 84 84
Occupied Hostel Rooms 75% 0 rooms 56 rooms 56 rooms
Hostel Guests 4.0 per room 0 225 225
Total Hotel + Hostel Guests 84 309 309
Notes:
Average household size reflects City average household size and product mix of multifamily units Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2024 dollars
6/13/2024 Page 4 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 135 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Property Tax
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
2031 2036 2041
Estimated Assessed Value - Residential $17,665,293 $43,883,799 $53,834,734 Estimated Assessed Value - Non-Residential $21,529,576 $39,769,693 $46,432,458 Total Estimated Assessed Value $39,194,869 $83,653,492 $100,267,191 Total Secured Property Tax General Levy 1.00% $391,949 $836,535 $1,002,672 Estimated Unsecured Property Tax as % of Secured Non-Residential Value 10.00% $21,530 $39,770 $46,432 Total Estimated Secured + Unsecured Property Tax $413,478 $876,305 $1,049,104 Distributions to Taxing Entities
City of Mount Shasta 6.68% $27,600 $58,600 $70,100
City Allocation to EIFD (3.34%) ($13,800) ($29,300) ($35,100) Net Property Tax to City 3.34% $13,800 $29,300 $35,000
Siskiyou County General 5.37% $22,200 $47,000 $56,300
County Allocation to EIFD (2.68%) ($11,100) ($23,500) ($28,200) Net Siskiyou County Distributions 2.68% $11,100 $23,500 $28,100 Notes:
Assumed general levy distributions post-annexation
Does not include property tax overrides above 1% general levy Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2024 dollars
Source: Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller (2023)
6/13/2024 Page 5 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 136 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Property Tax In-Lieu of Motor Vehicle License Fees (MVLF) Total AV within CITY (FY 2020-2021) $424,071,815
MVLF Revenues (2020-2021) $343,552
Prop Tax In-Lieu of MVLF per $1M of AV $810
Year 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
2027 2031 2036 2041
Estimated Project Assessed Value $0 $39,194,869 $83,653,492 $100,267,191 Incremental Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF to City $0 $31,800 $67,800 $81,200 City Allocation to EIFD $0 ($15,900) ($33,900) ($40,600) Net Incremental Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF to City $0 $15,900 $33,900 $40,600 Total AV within COUNTY (FY 2020-2021) $5,346,582,178
Current Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF (2020-2021) $6,032,327 Prop Tax In-Lieu of MVLF per $1M of AV $1,128
Year 1 Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
2027 2031 2036 2041
Estimated Project Assessed Value $0 $39,194,869 $83,653,492 $100,267,191 Incremental Property Tax In-Lieu of MVLF to County $0 $44,200 $94,400 $113,100 Notes:
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2024 dollars
Source: Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller (2023)
6/13/2024 Page 6 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 137 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Property Transfer Tax / Documentary Transfer Tax
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
2031 2036 2041
Estimated Assessed Value $39,194,869 $83,653,492 $100,267,191 Estimated Property Turnover Rate 5.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Estimated Value of Property Transferred $1,959,743 $4,182,675 $5,013,360 Total Transfer Tax $1.10 per $1,000 $2,200 $4,600 $5,500 Transfer Tax to City $0.55 per $1,000 $1,100 $2,300 $2,800 Transfer Tax to County $0.55 per $1,000 $1,100 $2,300 $2,800 Notes:
Select years shown for illustration
Values in 2024 dollars
Source: Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller (2023)
6/13/2024 Page 7 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 138 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Sales Tax - Direct / On-Site
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
Project Component 2031 2036 2041
Retail SF 10,000 SF 20,000 SF 27,500 SF
Percent assumed to be taxable sales-generating 75% 75% 75% Total Sales-Generating SF 7,500 SF 15,000 SF 20,625 SF
Estimated Taxable Sales $300 PSF $2,608,367 $6,047,624 $9,639,923 Bradley-Burns Sales Tax to City 1.00% $26,084 $60,476 $96,399 Use Tax as % of Sales Tax 12.00% $3,130 $7,257 $11,568
Bradley-Burns Sales and Use Tax to City - Direct $29,200 $67,700 $108,000 Sales Tax to County 0.25% $6,500 $15,100 $24,100
Net of Sales Transfer within County (10%) ($650) ($1,510) ($2,410) Sales Tax to County $5,850 $13,590 $21,690
Notes:
Does not include additional 0.25% Mt. Shasta Libraries Transactions and Use Tax County sales tax per Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7203.1 (0.25%) Does not include additional sales tax allocation for public safety from Proposition 172 (collected by State BOE and apportioned to counties based on proportionate share of taxable sales) Taxable sales PSF factor escalated 3% annually
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2024 dollars.
6/13/2024 Page 8 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 139 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Sales Tax - Indirect / Off-Site
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
2031 2036 2041
Estimated # Employees 105 199 218
Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / Empl. Within City $6,902 $8,001 $9,275 Estimated Employee Taxable Retail Spending $725,853 $1,590,878 $2,021,884 Estimated # Occupied Dwelling Units 76 DU 171 DU 190 DU Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / HH $23,994 $27,816 $32,246 Estimated Resident Taxable Retail Spending $1,823,559 $4,756,509 $6,126,775 Estimated Capture within City 35.0% $638,245 $1,664,778 $2,144,371 Estimated # Occupied Hotel + Hostel Guests 84 guests 309 guests 309 guests Estimated Annual Taxable Retail Spending / Guest $12,694 $14,716 $17,060 Estimated Guest Taxable Retail Spending $1,071,061 $4,552,727 $5,277,858 Estimated Capture within City 50.0% $535,530 $2,276,363 $2,638,929 Total Estimated Indirect Taxable Sales $1,899,629 $5,532,020 $6,805,184 Less Estimated Capture Within District Retail (5.0%) ($94,981) ($276,601) ($340,259) Net Indirect Taxable Sales $1,804,648 $5,255,419 $6,464,925 Bradley-Burns Sales Tax to City 1.00% $18,046 $52,554 $64,649 Use Tax as % of Sales Tax 12.00% $2,166 $6,307 $7,758
Bradley-Burns Sales and Use Tax to City - Indirect $20,200 $58,900 $72,400 Sales Tax to County 0.25% $4,500 $13,100 $16,200
Net of Sales Transfer within County (10%) ($450) ($1,310) ($1,620) Sales Tax to County $4,050 $11,790 $14,580
Notes:
Does not include additional 0.25% Mt. Shasta Libraries Transactions and Use Tax County sales tax per Revenue and Taxation Code Section 7203.1 (0.25%) Does not include additional sales tax allocation for public safety from Proposition 172 (collected by State BOE and apportioned to counties based on proportionate share of taxable sales) Employee spending estimates based on "Office Worker Retail Spending Patterns: A Downtown and Suburban Area Study," ICSC (2004).
Household spending based on average houshold income within City.
Hotel guest spending estimated based on American Hotel and Lodging Association (AHLA) data.
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2024 dollars.
6/13/2024 Page 9 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 140 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Transient Occupancy Tax ("TOT") to City
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
2031 2036 2041
Estimated # Hotel + Hostel Rooms 75 rooms 150 rooms 150 rooms Average Daily Room Rate (ADR) $145 $168 $195
Average Occupancy Rate 73% 73% 73%
Annual Hotel Room Receipts $2,895,830 $6,714,122 $7,783,508 TOT to City 10.00% $289,600 $671,400 $778,400
Notes:
Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2024 dollars.
6/13/2024 Page 10 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 141 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
City Service Population
City Population 3,247
City Employee Population 1,936
Employee Weighting for Service Population 0.5
Weighted # Employees 968
Total City Service Population 4,215
Source: CA Department of Finance, U.S. Census Bureau Center for Economic Studies (2021) 6/13/2024 Page 11 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 142 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
City Multipler Revenue and Expenditure Factors
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
Budget Category
Adopted City
Budget Allocation Basis
Relevant City
Population /
Factor
Discount for
Operational
Efficiency
Per Capita
Factor
Annual
Escalation 2031 2036 2041
Revenues
Business License Tax $80,000 Per Employee 1,936 0% $41.32 3.0% $47.90 $55.53 $64.38 Cannabis Related Taxes $149,000 Service Population 4,215 0% $35.35 3.0% $40.98 $47.51 $55.07 Fines & Forfeitures $6,800 Service Population 4,215 0% $1.61 3.0% $1.87 $2.17 $2.51 Franchise Tax $88,000 Service Population 4,215 0% $20.88 3.0% $24.20 $28.06 $32.53 Interest & Rental Revenues $4,150 Service Population 4,215 0% $0.98 3.0% $1.14 $1.32 $1.53 Current Service Charges $5,600 Per Resident 3,247 0% $1.72 3.0% $2.00 $2.32 $2.69 Administrative Allocation $311,509 Service Population 4,215 0% $73.90 3.0% $85.68 $99.32 $115.14 Transfers In $120,000 Service Population 4,215 0% $28.47 3.0% $33.00 $38.26 $44.35 Other Misc. Revenues $227,100 Service Population 4,215 0% $53.88 3.0% $62.46 $72.41 $83.94 Total Selected Revenues $992,159
Expenditures
Legislative $38,330 Service Population 4,215 25% $6.82 3.0% $7.91 $9.17 $10.63 Administration & Finance $1,118,382 Service Population 4,215 25% $199.00 3.0% $230.70 $267.44 $310.04 Public Safety - Police & Fire $2,437,397 Service Population 4,215 10% $520.44 3.0% $603.33 $699.43 $810.83 Buildings & Operations $1,202,407 Service Population 4,215 25% $213.95 3.0% $248.03 $287.53 $333.33 Public Works Dept. $587,708 Service Population 4,215 25% $104.57 3.0% $121.23 $140.54 $162.92 Total Selected Expenditures $5,384,224
Notes:
Taxes refers to business license tax and the four distinct cannabis related taxes.
Major case study revenues not shown include property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax Non-recurring revenues excluded (e.g. Federal Grants, State Subventions and Grants, Permits and Licenses, Zoning and Subdivision Applic., Conditional Use Permit, Sign Permit, Building Inspector Services) Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2024 dollars.
Source: City of Mount Shasta 2021-2022 Mid-Year Budget Update 6/13/2024 Page 12 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 143 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
City Multipler Revenues and Expenditures
Year 5 Year 10 Year 15
2031 2036 2041
Estimated # Residents 152 342 380
Estimated # Employees 105 199 218
Total Project Service Population 205 441 489
Budget Category 2031 2036 2041
Revenues
Business License Tax $5,000 $11,000 $14,000
Cannabis Related Taxes $8,400 $21,000 $26,900
Fines & Forfeitures $400 $1,000 $1,200
Franchise Tax $5,000 $12,400 $15,900
Interest & Rental Revenues $200 $600 $800
Current Service Charges $300 $800 $1,000
Administrative Allocation $17,500 $43,800 $56,300
Transfers In $6,800 $16,900 $21,700
Other Misc. Revenues $12,800 $32,000 $41,000
Total Multiplier Revenues $56,400 $139,500 $178,800
Expenditures
Legislative $1,600 $4,000 $5,200
Administration & Finance $47,200 $118,100 $151,600
Public Safety - Police & Fire $123,400 $308,700 $396,500 Buildings & Operations $50,700 $126,900 $163,000
Public Works Dept. $24,800 $62,000 $79,700
Total Multiplier Expenditures $247,700 $619,700 $796,000 Notes:
Major case study revenues not shown include property tax, sales tax, transient occupancy tax Adjusted for inflation assuming 3% annual inflation rate.
Select years shown for illustration.
Values in 2024 dollars.
Source: City of Mount Shasta 2021-2022 Mid-Year Budget Update 6/13/2024 Page 13 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 144 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
IMPLAN Inputs
Construction Inputs
Industry NAICS Category
Approximate Inputs
(Industry Spending)
58 - Construction of new multifamily residential structures $50,000,000 55 - Construction of new commercial structures, including farm structures $31,375,000 51 - Construction of new manufacturing structures $3,125,000 Ongoing Operation Inputs
Industry NAICS Category
Approximate Inputs
(Employment Change)
507 - Hotels and motels, including casino hotels 100 Jobs 412 - Retail - Miscellaneous store retailers 69 Jobs
470 - Office administrative services 29 Jobs
422 - Warehousing and storage 17 Jobs
476 - Services to buildings 4 Jobs
6/13/2024 Page 14 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 145 Appendix D to the IFP - EIFD Fiscal Impact Analysis
Summary of IMPLAN Economic Benefits
Economic Benefits from Construction (One-Time / Short-Term) Employment Labor Income Economic Output
Direct (On-Site) 1,038 $50,171,811 $84,500,000
Indirect 63 $2,459,881 $9,945,397
Induced 144 $6,144,279 $22,256,783
Total Countywide 1,245 $58,775,970 $116,702,179
Estimated City Capture 1,049 $50,602,019 $86,110,109
Economic Benefits from Ongoing Operation (Annual)
Employment Labor Income Economic Output
Direct (On-Site) 219 $5,931,187 $15,883,296
Indirect 26 $934,404 $3,386,719
Induced 18 $769,907 $2,788,635
Total Countywide 263 $7,635,497 $22,058,650
Estimated City Capture 221 $6,016,402 $16,192,064
Notes
100% of direct benefits estimated to be captured on-site within the City. 5% of indirect and induced benefits estimated to be captured off-site within the City.
Estimated ongoing benefits upon build-out and stabilization. 6/13/2024 Page 15 of 15
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 146 Prepared by:
Kosmont Companies
Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD)
City Council Consideration of the
Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP)
November 11, 2024
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 147 Executive Summary
Communicating in a Digital World
2 • City has evaluated EIFD as a potential funding and financing tool for infrastructure in key economic development opportunity sites in the City
• Goal is to fund public improvements and infrastructure projects to catalyze and support economic development (without adding a new tax)
• City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention (ROI) to form the EIFD on September 11, 2023 (ROI map amended April 8, 2024)
• Public Financing Authority (PFA) met May 22, 2024 to adopt PFA Bylaws and direct preparation of the guiding Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP)
• PFA met October 2, 2024 to hear a presentation of the draft IFP from staff and consultants and address questions, but take no action
• PFA held the first of three public hearings on the IFP on November 4, 2024 to hear additional comments and questions, but take no action
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 148 Executive Summary (Continued)
3 • City Council is being asked to consider approval of the governing IFP, including the proposed allocation of a portion of future City property tax increment within the EIFD boundary • Next steps include two additional PFA public hearings – completion targeted before February 2025
• If the IFP is modified after City Council action this evening, the modified IFP would be required to return to the City Council for approval prior to EIFD formation Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 149 Outline
4 I. Overview and Background
II. Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) Contents
III. Next Steps and Timing
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 150 5 $0M
$100M
$200M
$300M
$400M
$500M
$600M
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Baseline Property Value
Property taxes continue to flow to City / County / Schools / Other Taxing Entities as normal New Property Value from
New Development / Rehabilitation
Available to TIF District
Years from District Formation
Assessed
Property Value
(A/V) within
TIF District
Boundaries
New Total
Value After
TIF District
Benefits all
Taxing Entities
Period of New
Development
Note: Illustrative. Conservative 2% growth of existing assessed value (A/V) shown; does not include mark-to-market increases associated with property sales.
What is Tax Increment Financing (TIF) – Not a New Tax
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 151 EIFD Fundamentals
Communicating in a Digital World
6 45 years from first bond issuance Long Term
Districts
Governance Public Financing Authority (PFA) implements Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) Approvals Mandatory public hearings for formation with protest opportunity; no public vote Any property with useful life of 15+ years & of communitywide significance; purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, seismic retrofit, rehabilitation, and maintenance Eligible
Projects
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 152 TIF Districts in Progress
Statewide
(Partial List)
Fully Formed In Formation Process Under Evaluation
Jurisdiction Purpose
Apple Valley Industrial and housing supportive infrastructure Banning (CRIA) Downtown revitalization, industrial infrastructure Barstow Industrial and housing supportive infrastructure Brentwood Housing, employment, and transit-supportive infrastructure Buena Park Mall reimagination, housing-supportive infrastructure Carson + L.A. County Remediation, affordable housing, recreation Citrus Heights Mall reimagination
Covina Downtown housing and blended use supportive infrastructure Fairfield Downtown, housing, and transit-supportive infrastructure Fresno Downtown, housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Fresno County Industrial and commercial supportive infrastructure Humboldt County Coastal mixed-use and energy supportive infrastructure Inglewood (CRD) Transit-related infrastructure
Imperial County Industrial, renewable energy, and housing and infrastructure La Verne + L.A. County Housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Long Beach Economic empowerment and affordable housing
Los Angeles (Downtown, San Pedro, other) Affordable housing and transit-supportive infrastructure Los Angeles County Uninc. West Carson Housing / bio-science / tech infrastructure Madera County (3 Districts) Water, sewer, roads and other housing infrastructure Modesto + Stanislaus County Downtown, housing, and recreation infrastructure Mount Shasta Rural brownfield mixed-use infrastructure
Napa Downtown, housing, tourism supportive infrastructure Oakland Affordable housing and infrastructure
Ontario Industrial and housing infrastructure
Palmdale + L.A. County Housing and commercial infrastructure Pittsburg Housing, commercial, and tech park infrastructure Placentia + Orange County Housing and TOD infrastructure Rancho Cucamonga Blended use and connectivity infrastructure Redlands Education related and blended use infrastructure Redondo Beach + L.A. County Parks / open space, recreation infrastructure Riverside Affordable housing and infrastructure
Sacramento County (Unincorporated) Industrial / commercial supportive infrastructure San Rafael (EIFD + CRD) Blended-use and climate resilience infrastructure Sanger Housing and commercial supportive infrastructure Santa Cruz (EIFD + CRD) Downtown, blended use, and climate resilience infrastructure Santa Fe Springs Blended use infrastructure
Selma Water, sewer, and other housing supportive infrastructure Vacaville Housing and business park infrastructure
Yucaipa Housing and commercial infrastructure
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 153 Contents of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP)
8 A. Description of the District
B. Description of Proposed Facilities and Development
C. Finding of Communitywide Significance
D. Financing Section
E. Goals of the District
F. Appendices (e.g., Legal Description, Financial Analysis Detail) Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 154 Map of EIFD Study Area
9 Source: City of Mount Shasta, Siskiyou County Auditor-Controller (2023) • Approx. 32% of Citywide acreage
• Approx. 15% of Citywide Assessed Value (A/V)
• Includes areas with future development potential,
including initial private sector investment interest
Existing
Acreage
Existing
A/V
Proposed Initial EIFD
Boundaries (within City) 760 AC $9.9M
Potential Future Expansion
Area (County jurisdiction) 148 AC $6.7M
Total Study Area 908 AC $16.6M
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 155 10 Future Development Assumptions
Absorption Assumed over 10-30 Years
Note: AV at buildout values in current 2024 dollars.
Source: City of Mount Shasta, CoStar (2023)
Area # SF / Units / Rooms Estimated
AV Factor
Estimated
Total AV at Buildout
Market-Rate Residential 160 units $250K / unit $40.0 million Affordable Housing 40 units (property tax-exempt) $0
Commercial / Retail 27,500 SF $250 PSF $6.9 million
Office / Flex 10,000 SF $200 PSF $2.0 million
Industrial / Flex 25,000 SF $125 PSF $3.1 million
Hotel 75 rooms $200K / room $15.0 million
Hostel 75 rooms $100K / room $7.5 million
Total New Development Assumed $74.5 million
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 156 11 Source: Discussions with City of Mount Shasta and Siskiyou County EDC staff Examples of Targeted Infrastructure Improvements
• Housing and commercial supportive infrastructure (e.g., roadway improvements, utility enhancements, remediation activities)
• Potential water tank improvements in northern region of the City • Target is infrastructure to enable and facilitate and catalyze growth at the Landing / One Shasta LLC Sites and other potential development opportunity site areas (e.g., Orchard) • Current IFP draft is flexible, allows for future amendment to accommodate changing conditions Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 157 12 EIFD Revenue
Contribution Scenario
Year 5
Accumulated
Revenue
Year 10
Accumulated
Revenue
50-Year
Present Value
@ 3% Discount
Rate
50-Year
Nominal
Total
City 50% $62,000 $310,000 $1,898,000 $4,454,000
City allocation includes both AB8 property tax + property tax in lieu of motor vehicle license fees (MVLF). “Year 5” means 5th year of revenue following district formation.
Financing Section
• City will commit 50% of its future property tax increment within the boundary for approx. 50 years (remaining portion flows to General Fund)
• Estimated to total approximately $1.9M on a present-value basis, though actual revenues may be greater or less, depending on actual investment and assessed value growth Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 158 13 Private Sector Partnership Approaches
• Outside of debt issuance alternatives, certain other EIFDs have negotiated partnerships with private sector landowner / developer partners (e.g., Madera County EIFDs, Carson / L.A.
County EIFD)
• Private sector may be willing to advance infrastructure funding in exchange for reimbursement from EIFD proceeds
• Could be documented via Reimbursement Agreement, Development Agreement, other alternatives
• May be of particular interest for interested developers for the Landing / One Shasta LLC opportunity sites
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 159 Regional and Communitywide Significance
14 • Implementation of essential infrastructure improvements of communitywide and regional benefit • Social impacts: Quality of life improvement, environmental sustainability • Housing production, including affordable housing
• Economic benefits:
200+ permanent, direct jobs from operation; additional 40+ indirect and induced permanent jobs (240+ total jobs), supporting $7.6M+ in ongoing annual wages in the City and County Additional 1,200+ temporary construction-related jobs*, supporting $58M+ in construction-related wages
• Acceleration of development and related fiscal revenues:
Positive City general fund net fiscal impact of ~$11.8 million over district lifetime, further improving after district termination (net of City service costs and net of City allocation to EIFD)* • Catalyze economic development and attract other money (e.g., grants) * One construction job-year = one year of employment for one construction employment position Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 160 15 EIFDs Attract Other Funding
Other Public Sources
Cap-and-Trade / HCD grant & loan
programs (AHSC, IIG, TCC,CERF)
Prop 68 parks & open space grants
Prop 1 water/sewer funds
Caltrans ATP / HSIP grants
Federal EDA / DOT / EPA funding
Federal ARPA, Invest Act, IIJ Act
Other Private Sources
Development Agreement / impact fees
Benefit assessments (e.g., contribution from CFD)
Private investment
• EIFDs attract other funding sources and explicitly increase scoring for CA state housing funds Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 161 16 Targeted EIFD Formation Schedule
Tax increment allocation begins fiscal year following district formation Debt issuance, if desired, would occur after a stabilized level of tax increment has been established (~3-5 years) Target Date Task
COMPLETE Sept 11, 2023 a) City Council considers Resolution of Intention (ROI) to form EIFD and formally establish PFA Board COMPLETE April 8, 2024 b) City Council adopts Resolution amending ROI to update proposed EIFD Map COMPLETE May 22, 2024 c) Introductory PFA meeting to direct the drafting of the Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) COMPLETE Oct 2, 2024 d) PFA holds an initial public meeting to present the draft IFP COMPLETE Nov 4, 2024 e) PFA holds first “official” public hearing to hear written and oral comments but take no action TODAY Nov 11, 2024 f) City Council considers resolution approving IFP December 4, 2024 g) PFA holds second public hearing to hear additional comments and take action to modify or reject IFP January 6 or 8, 2025
h) PFA holds third public hearing to consider oral and written protests and take action to terminate proceedings or adopt IFP and form the EIFD by resolution
h) Filings with State Board of Equalization (BOE)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 162 17 Next Steps / Action Items
• For tonight:
a) Consider adoption of Resolution approving EIFD Infrastructure Financing Plan (IFP) and allocation of a portion of City’s future property tax increment within EIFD boundary • EIFD website: https://www.mtshastaca.gov/public-finance-authority/page/enhanced-infrastructure-financing-district-eifd Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 163 18 THANK YOU
Questions?
Kosmont Companies
1601 N. Sepulveda Blvd. #382 Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
Ph: (424) 297-1070 | Fax: (424) 286-4632
www.kosmont.com
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 164 Communicating in a Digital World
19 Appendix
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 165 20 Reference: EIFD Glossary
• EIFD – Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District: Tax increment financing mechanism that utilizes future property tax from participating public agencies within a defined boundary to fund eligible infrastructure improvements
• PFA – Public Financing Authority: Governing board of an EIFD, comprised of elected officials from participating public agencies (e.g., City Councilmembers, County Supervisors) as well as public members appointed by the legislative bodies of participating public agencies • IFP – Infrastructure Financing Plan: Governing document of the EIFD, outlining the proposed improvements to be funded as well as the financial terms of the EIFD, including allocation of future property tax increment from participating public agencies Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 166 21 Mechanics of TIF / EIFD
Private property
investment or new
development
Increased property
tax revenue from
new property value
Deposited in
separate EIFD
fund
Funds pay for public
improvements
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024
NOT A NEW TAX
167
22 EIFD versus Former Redevelopment Agencies
Sample of Differences
Former RDAs EIFDs
Eligible Use of Funds • Infrastructure and affordable
housing
• Market-rate housing
• Land clearing and parcel assembly
• Tax and other private business /
developer subsidies
• Public infrastructure (e.g., roads,
sewers, open space, utilities)
• Affordable housing
Eminent Domain /
Condemnation
• Allowed • Not allowed
Eligible Areas • Must qualify as “blighted” • No “blight” finding required Governance • City Council or County Board
• School entity participation
• Public Financing Authority including
Public Members (no school entities)
Formation • Vote of governing body • 3 public hearings, majority protest opportunity
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 168 Comparison of TIF/EIFD and Other Tools
Communicating in a Digital World
23 District Type Description Revenue
Source
Approval
Structure
Use of
Funds
TIF (e.g., EIFD, CRIA,
IFD, IRFD)
Incremental property tax
revenues from new
development used to fund
local infrastructure.
Max term is 45 years from
approval to issue debt.
Incremental (new
development) property tax
revenues (incl. VLF) – does not
increase taxes
District formation – No vote,
but majority protest
opportunity by landowners
and registered voters
Bond issuance – None
• Infrastructure of regional or
communitywide significance
• Maintenance
• Affordable housing
Mello-Roos Community
Facilities District (CFD)
and/or Assessment
District
Additional assessment or
“special tax” used to fund
infrastructure / services that
benefit property.
Max term is 40 years from
date of debt issuance.
New property assessment or
tax – appears as separate line
item on tax bill
District formation – 2/3 vote of
landowners or registered
voters in district*
Bond issuance – vote of elected
body (City)
• Infrastructure capital
expenditures of benefit to
landowners
• Maintenance
• Public services (e.g. safety,
programs)
General Obligation Voter-approved debt that is
repaid with “override” to 1%
tax levy; City-wide
Direct property tax levied on
all properties at same millage
rate
2/3 vote of registered voters in
entire City
• In accordance with bond
plebiscite
Lease Revenue / COPs General Fund-supported
borrowing, generally utilizing
City-owned assets to be
leased and leased back
General Fund (or other legally
available revenues as
determined by City)
Vote of elected body (City) • In accordance with bond
authorization
Potential funding strategy can utilize MULTIPLE mechanisms * For CFD formation, a vote of registered voters within the district boundary is required if 12 or more registered voters live therein (otherwise a vote of landowners prorated by acreage).
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 169 EIFDs as a Component of the Mount Shasta Economic
Development and Public Financing Toolkit
Communicating in a Digital World
24 • There are advantages / disadvantages to EIFD compared to other mechanisms, such as general obligation (GO) bonds, lease revenue bonds / COPs, Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) financing, assessment districts, and other tools
• Advantages of EIFD include no encumbrance of existing city/county resources, can attract tax increment contributions from other taxing entities, increased priority for grant funding, ability to demonstrate commitment to multiple infrastructure (and/or affordable housing) projects to catalyze private sector development, capacity to fund maintenance, no additional taxes to property owners / residents / businesses, and ease of voter approval • Disadvantages of EIFD include lack of comparable financings thus far, statutory vs. constitutional authority to issue debt, and subordination to redevelopment successor agency obligations, • Advantages of EIFD vs. Other CA TIF Tools (e.g. CRIA, IFD, IRFD, AHA, SIFD) include flexibility in delineating project areas, capacity to dedicate property tax in lieu of MVLF, district duration, and governing board composition and corresponding implications for taxing entity partnership • Complementary Tool: EIFD should not be considered a replacement for other useful financing mechanisms, but rather a complementary tool; other jurisdictions have been successful in utilizing EIFD as well as other tools for different projects within the same community
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 170 25 Potential Partner Agencies
Property Tax Distribution
• Primary non-school recipients and potential
contributors of property tax are City of Mt. Shasta and County of Siskiyou
• City share of property tax varies between 0% and 15%
among the opportunity sites evaluated (e.g., partly due to previous annexation / sharing agreements)
City additionally receives equivalent of approx. 8% of property tax in lieu of MVLF, also available to EIFD
• County share similarly various between 5% and 21%
County additionally receives equivalent of approx. 11% of property tax in lieu of MVLF, also available to EIFD, but not incorporated into this analysis to be conservative
• School-related entities cannot participate
Tax Rate Area (TRA) weighted average distributions for EIFD Study Area shown. Post-ERAF (Education Revenue Augmentation Fund) distribution.
Source: Siskiyou County Auditor Controller (2023)
City
7% County
10%
Other / School
Entities (not eligible)
83%
Approx. Weighted Average Property Tax
Distribution within EIFD Study Area (not incl. VLF)
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 171 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #11
MEETING DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
SUBJECT: New Humane Society One-Year Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests the City Council adopt Resolution CCR-24-XX, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta appropriating funds from the General Fund not to exceed $10,000 to continue to utilize the services of the Siskiyou Humane Society.
BACKGROUND & SUMMARY:
Effective July 25th, 2024, the previous agreement with the Siskiyou Humane Society expired and the Executive Director requested changes to the contract to streamline processes and move to a flat fee funding model. Staff and Humane Society personnel met on several occasions in order to better understand the requested changes. Or current procedures for processing of stray and nuisance animals is cumbersome for pet owners who are attempting to retrieve their animals as it is for City and Humane Society Staff. The Humane Society has agreed to flat fee to be paid by the City of Mt Shasta for the care and feeding of stray and nuisance animals. The Society will then manage reunification and rehoming as needed for animals and their owners.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution CCR-24-XX
X Regular Session
Special Session
Emergency
Session
Closed Session
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 172 RESOLUTION CCR-24-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE SISKIYOU HUMANE SOCIETY AND
APPROVING BUDGET ADJUSTMENT NUMBER 2024/2025-01
APPROPRIATING $10,000.00 FROM THE GENERAL FUND
FOR ANIMAL SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Mt. Shasta requires the services of housing stray animals; and WHEREAS, the City received a proposal from Siskiyou Humane Society; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to continue use of the services provided; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to appropriate General Fund for this purpose.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute agreement documents with the Siskiyou Humane Society for animal services on behalf of the City and approves Budget Adjustment No. 2024/2025-01, appropriating $10,000.00 from the General Fund for the services.
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of November, 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
DATED: November 12, 2024
CITY OF MT. SHASTA
______________________________
John Stackfleth, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Kathryn Joyce, Deputy City Clerk
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 173 City of Mt Shasta
Budget Adjustment Request
2024/2025-01
FUND/
DEPARTMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
CURRENT BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
AMOUNT
ADJUSTED
BUDGET
General Fund/
Enforcement 10-625-7110 $10,000 $10,000
NET ADJUSTMENT $ 10,000
JUSTIFICATION:
FUNDING SOURCE:
COUNCIL APPROVAL Required
Not Required
DEPARTMENT APPROVALS
Department Head
Finance Director
City Manager
CITY CLERK
Budget Adjustment Number:
RESOLUTION NUMBER:
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
Animal Services
General Fund
I certify that the City Council approved the above resolution incorporating this budget amendment.
X
G:\City Council\City Council Agenda Packets 2024\11.12.2024\11 Humane Society\Budget_Adjust_2024-2025.01 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 174 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA AND THE
SISKIYOU HUMANE SOCIETY
FOR THE CARE, CUSTODY, AND DISPOSITION OF
ANIMALS DELIVERED TO THE ANIMAL SHELTER
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on the day of November 1, 2024, by and between the City of Mt.
Shasta, hereinafter called "City", and the Siskiyou Humane Society, Inc., a non-profit public benefit corporation, hereinafter called the "Society".
RECITALS
The Society, whose address for the purpose of this Agreement is 1208 N. Mt Shasta Blvd, Mt Shasta, CA 96067 and the City, whose address for the purpose of this Agreement is 305 N. Mt Shasta, Blvd, Mt Shasta, CA 96067 enter this agreement with the Society’s purpose being to provide for the care, custody and disposition of animals, specifically dogs and cats, that are found or seized within the city limits of Mt. Shasta City (the Agreement Area – Exhibit A), either as abandoned strays, owner arrests, victims of vehicle impoundments and accidents, or otherwise come into the care of City of Mt. Shasta employees or representatives, or public citizens.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE AGREEMENT
1. Term of Agreement: This agreement shall commence on November 1, 2024, and shall terminate June 30, 2025, unless sooner terminated by the provisions herein.
2. Obligations of Society: The Society shall:
2.1 Provide an animal shelter that is operated and staffed in a professional manner according to industry standards. This includes but is not limited to receiving, providing board and care for all domestic cats and dogs found or seized within the Agreement Area and are delivered to the shelter by the City or public citizens. Care shall include but is not limited to species- appropriate sanitary housing, appropriate food, fresh water, exercise, supervision and any other services needed to keep the animals healthy and fit.
2.2 Provide a key code to allow access to Society facilities with an accessible space for the City to deliver stray/seized animals, that meet the conditions identified in section 3.2 of this Agreement, to the shelter during hours when the shelter is closed. This key code is not to be shared with other agencies or municipalities. The Society shall evaluate all animals delivered after-hours on the next business day. After hours, assistance is at the discretion of the Society and is not guaranteed. “After-hours" is defined in Appendix A.
2.3 Provide training and instruction in after-hours impound procedures to all animal control officers, police officers, or designated agents of the City. Society operating hours, staff availability after-hours and reclaim hours to be provided and kept current. “After-hours" is defined in Appendix A.
2.4 Maintain accurate records of all animals delivered to the shelter by the City and/or public, animals surrendered by owners, lost or impounded animals released to owners, adoptions, and animal deaths. Information will be submitted for the Siskiyou County Quarterly Rabies Control Report.
2.5 Release impounded animals as deemed appropriate by Society staff. Including verifying Rabies vaccinations and microchipping the animal, if it’s not microchipped.
2.6 At the City’s request, provides technical assistance during animal welfare emergencies, when Society staff and resources are available, provided that an agent, officer, or representative of the City Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 175 is on site or directly available during the emergency. For such emergency assistance, Society shall invoice the City for those hours at a minimum of 2 hours per incident at a cost of $50 per hour.
2.7 Engage in professional and respectful, non-violent written and verbal communication to City staff and the public.
3. Obligations of City: The City shall:
3.1 Require all officers or agents to be trained in drop-off procedures and how to deliver animals after-hours when it cannot be avoided. “After-hours" is defined in Appendix A.
3.2 The Society does not provide on-site veterinary services. The City should make arrangements, outside the scope of this Agreement, for the treatment of sick or injured animals impounded by the City. City staff shall not bring visibly sick or injured animals to the Society without prior approval from the Society’s Executive Director.
3.3 In cases of animal abuse or situations where an animal is not to be returned to its owner, the City must clearly indicate this on the impound ticket. Additionally, a follow-up notification must be provided to the Society within three days of the impound. This notification must be written by the Police Chief or a designated representative.
3.4 The City shall coordinate with the Siskiyou County Sheriff or the California Highway Patrol for any impounds within the Agreement Area so that all animals delivered to the Society are delivered by an authorized and trained employee or representative of the City.
3.5 Restrict drop-offs to animals seized only from the Agreement Area. Keep Society access codes secure and prohibit sharing with other municipalities, agencies or individuals not employed or representing the City. A breach of this provision is cause for termination of this Agreement. Society shall provide notice of any breach, and what actions are necessary to remedy and return to compliance. This may include but is not limited to: full compensation for any and all expenses incurred for the care of an animal brought in from outside the Agreement Area while under the care of the Society, plus all impound and boarding fees listed in Appendix B until the animal is relocated to the appropriate owned facility. Repeated breaches of this provision, and/or failure to remedy a breach of this provision, will be cause for Society to terminate this Agreement.
3.6 Respond to requests from the Society for prompt and professional assistance regarding animal abandonment or emergency situations.
3.7 Engage in professional and respectful, non-violent written and verbal communication to Society staff and volunteers.
4. Compensation:
4.1 The City agrees to pay the Society $10,000 for the duration of this Agreement, in a lump sum upon execution, for allservices as outlined above for animals placed in the care of the Society by the City or public citizen.
4.2 If the City requests after-hour assistance and the Society can respond to such a request, the Society shall invoice the City for those hours as outlined in 2.6 of the Agreement.
4.3 The City shall be responsible for veterinary bills for sick or injured animals brought to the Society by the City without prior approval by the Society’s Executive Director.
4.4 The Society shall collect and retain revenues of all impound and boarding fees for each animal Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 176 found or seized, withing the Agreement Area, and delivered to the society by the City or public citizens. This includes animals being brought in by the City through their partnerships with the County of Siskiyou or California Highway Patrol.
5. Assignment: Society may not assign its rights or responsibilities under this Agreement without the prior written consent of City.
6. Entire Agreement: This constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, undertakings, agreements, and arrangements, oral or written, with respect thereto. Any modifications hereto must be in writing and signed by both parties.
7. Compensation from Other Sources: Nothing herein shall restrict Society's right to collect compensation from other sources for services provided to them by Society. Nothing herein shall prohibit City from charging the owners of animals more than that which City pays to Society.
8. Indemnification: Society agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold City harmless from any liability of Society, its officers, agents, employees, directors others acting on behalf of Society for personal injury or property damage arising from services provided hereunder, except where caused in whole or in part by the negligence or willful misconduct of City or its officers, agents, employees or others acting on behalf of City. City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Society harmless from any liability of City or its officers, agents, employees or others acting on behalf of City for any personal injury or property damage caused by the alleged or actual negligence or willful misconduct of City, or arising from any claim made by a member of the public as a result of City action taken under this agreement, or in City's enforcing of any state or local laws pertaining to animals, which animals City causes to come into the physical possession of Society. This provision shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement.
9. Termination for Cause: A breach of any provision of this Agreement is grounds for termination of the Agreement. In the event of a breach, written notice will be provided with what actions are necessary to remedy the breach and return to compliance with the provisions of the Agreement. Except in cases in which the health and/or safety of an animal is in imminent jeopardy; and/or in cases in which the health and safety of City, Society, cooperating agency employees, volunteers and/or representatives, or the public is in imminent jeopardy, the party in breach shall be provided 30 days to remedy the breach and return to compliance with the Agreement. Extensions of time may be provided if both parties agree. If the breach is not remedied within the 30 days, or within an agreed upon extension, either party may terminate this Agreement. A breach of any provision that addresses removal and/or care for a dangerous or neglected animal, and/or any provision that puts City, Society, cooperating agency employees, volunteers and/or representatives, or the public in imminent jeopardy, may terminate this Agreement without further notice.
10. Severability: This is a severable Agreement and in the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be unenforceable by a California Court of competent jurisdiction, it is expressly agreed that this Agreement shall be construed so that the remaining provisions shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect, and any such unenforceable provisions shall be deemed, without further action on the part of any person or entity, to be modified, amended and/or limited, but only to the extent necessary to render the same valid and enforceable in such jurisdiction.
11. Not a Joint Venture: Nothing herein shall be deemed to have created a joint venture or partnership between City and Society. Neither shall be considered to be a principal or agent of the other as a result of this Agreement.
12. Authority to Execute Agreement: Each of the signers below warrants that he/she has been authorized by the governing board of the party for which he/she is signing this Agreement to execute the Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 177 same for the party.
13. Termination: Either party may terminate this agreement prior to its expiration by providing ninety (90) days written notice to the other party.
14. Extension/Renewal: This agreement may be modified and extended for additional one (1) year periods by mutual written agreement of the parties. Upon agreement that an extension/renewal is desirable by both parties, proposed modifications shall commence no later than March 1, 2025, and shall conclude no later than May 1, 2025.
CITY OF MT. SHASTA SISKIYOU HUMANE SOCIETY, INC.
By: By:
City Manager Executive Director
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 178 APPENDIX A: Siskiyou Humane Society Hours of Operation
1. The Society is open for the reclaim of animals from 12:30 PM to 4:00 PM, seven days a week.
Reclaim options outside these hours are available by appointment only and at the discretion of the Society.
2. The Society will have staff available to assist the City with drop-offs from 8am-5pm, seven days a week. “After-hours” is considered anything outside of these hours.
APPENDIX B: Fee Schedule
1. Fee Schedule is as follows:
a. Dog Impound: $35 first offense, $40 second offense, $50 third and all subsequent offenses b. Cat Impound: $25
c. Boarding Fee: $30 per Day per Animal
d. Unaltered Fees: $35 first offense, $50 second offense, $100 third and all subsequent offenses e. Adoption Program: $75 per Animal
f. Medical Care: Includes all costs associated with the care and custody of the animal, including but not limited to full payment for any vet bills, medical supplies, and direct costs for services such as employee compensation.
g. Other: Microchip $5
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 179 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #12
MEETING DATE: November 12, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
SUBJECT: Change Order for Springbrook Software
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff respectfully requests the City Council adopt Resolution CCR-24-XX, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta appropriating funds from the General Fund not to exceed $2,765 for the exchange of the Project Management Subscription in the amount of $3,465 to the Accounts Receivable and Purchase Order Subscriptions.
BACKGROUND & SUMMARY:
A few weeks ago, the Accounting Staff attended a demonstration on the differences between the Project Management module and the Accounts Receivable and Purchase Order modules.
After the demonstration and discussion about our needs for grant reporting and potential other billing opportunities, we agreed that this change would work best in the new system.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution CCR-24-XX
X Regular Session
Special Session
Emergency
Session
Closed Session
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 180 RESOLUTION CCR-24-XX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT
WITH SPRINGBROOK AND
APPROVING BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
FOR SOFTWARE TOTALING $2,765.00
WHEREAS, the City of Mt. Shasta wishes to change the project management subscription originally purchased to purchase order and accounts receivable subscriptions; and WHEREAS, we recommend that the City Council give approval for the City Manger to enter into such agreements; and
WHEREAS, the detail of the budget adjustment is outlined in the requested budget adjustment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
The City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute agreement documents with Springbrook for software services on behalf of the City and approves Budget Adjustment No. 2024/2025-02, appropriating $2,765.00 from the General Fund for the services.
The foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted this 12th day of November, 2024 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
DATED: November 12, 2024
CITY OF MT. SHASTA
______________________________
John Stackfleth, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Kathryn M. Joyce, Deputy City Clerk
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 181 City of Mt Shasta
Budget Adjustment Request
2024/2025-02
FUND/
DEPARTMENT
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
CURRENT BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
AMOUNT
ADJUSTED
BUDGET
General Fund/
Finance 10-520-7110 $47,804 $2,765 $50,569
NET ADJUSTMENT $ 2,765
JUSTIFICATION:
FUNDING SOURCE:
COUNCIL APPROVAL Required
Not Required
DEPARTMENT APPROVALS
Department Head
Finance Director
City Manager
CITY CLERK I certify that the City Council approved the above resolution incorporating this budget amendment.
Budget Adjustment Number:
RESOLUTION NUMBER:
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
Change software subsciption from Project Mangement module to Purchase Orders and Accounts Receivable Modules
General Fund
X
G:\City Council\City Council Agenda Packets 2024\11.12.2024\12 Springbrook\Budget_Adjust_2024-2025.02 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 182 Order Form: Q-23040-1
Date: 12/18/2023, 1:12 PM
Expires On: 2/1/2024
Phone: (866) 777-0069
Email: [email protected]
Ship To:
Mount Shasta, CA - City of
305 North Mount Shasta Boulevard
Mount Shasta, California 96067
Bill To:
Mount Shasta, CA - City of
305 North Mount Shasta Boulevard
Mount Shasta, California 96067
Account Manager E-mail Phone Number Payment Terms
Gary Kaber [email protected] 520-820-6167 Net 30
Annual Product Pricing
PRODUCT RATE QTY DISC (%) NET PRICE
Utility Billing Subscription USD 13,700.00 1 30.000 USD 9,590.00 Building Permits Subscription USD 4,300.00 1 30.000 USD 3,010.00 Licenses and Permits Subscription USD 4,300.00 1 30.000 USD 3,010.00 Finance Suite Subscription USD 12,900.00 1 30.000 USD 9,030.00 Payroll Subscription USD 7,150.00 1 30.000 USD 5,005.00 Project Management Subscription USD 4,950.00 1 30.000 USD 3,465.00 Employee Self Services Lite Subscription USD 2,400.00 1 30.000 USD 1,680.00 Fixed Assets Subscription USD 4,750.00 1 30.000 USD 3,325.00 Annual Product Pricing Total: USD 38,115.00
Estimated Professional Services
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION LIST PRICE NET PRICE QTY DISC % NET PRICE Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 210 50.000 USD 25,200.00
Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 40 50.000 USD 4,800.00
Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 45 50.000 USD 5,400.00
Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 150 50.000 USD 18,000.00
Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 250 50.000 USD 30,000.00
Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 22 50.000 USD 2,640.00
Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 14 50.000 USD 1,680.00
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FFAA84B-E438-41CE-B035-5797BB81E879 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 183 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION LIST PRICE NET PRICE QTY DISC % NET PRICE Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 22 50.000 USD 2,640.00
Estimated Professional Services Total: USD 90,360.00
Grand Total: USD 128,475.00
* excludes applicable sales tax
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FFAA84B-E438-41CE-B035-5797BB81E879 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 184 Order Details
Customer Name: Mount Shasta, CA - City of
Customer Contact:
Governing Agreement(s): This Order Form is governed by the applicable terms found at:
MSA: https://sprbrk.app.box.com/v/sprbrk-saas-terms
MLA: https://sprbrk.app.box.com/v/sprbrk-onpremise-terms Professional Services: https://sprbrk.app.box.com/v/sprbrk-svcs-terms Term(s): 3 Years
Order Terms
In the event of an inconsistency between this Order Form, any governing agreement, purchase order, or invoice, the Order Form shall govern as it pertains to this transaction. • This Order Form shall become effective as of the last date of signature (the "Effective Date"). • Order Start Date: Software Licenses, Subscriptions, Maintenance, and Hosting commence upon the earlier of a) date of delivery* or log-in to hosted software to Customer; or b) 60 days after Order Form Effective Date. • Subscriptions, Maintenance, Hosting, and Support (“Recurring Services”) continue from the Order Start Date through the term listed in this Order Form (or if not listed, one (1) year). • Orders for Recurring Services auto-renew unless the Customer or Springbrook provides a written notice of non-renewal at least sixty (60) days before the end of the Order Term. • Subscription Service fees and any Recurring Services will be subject to an automatic annual increase by not more than seven percent (7%) of the prior year’s Subscription Service fees ("Standard Annual Price Increase").
• Any Software Licenses or Hardware are one-time non-refundable purchases. • CivicPay Online Subscription fee and CivicPay IVR Subscription fee are subject to increase at per account rate, based on actual accounts.
• CivicPay IVR Message Block Subscriptions expire upon the earlier exhaustion of the Message Block or twelve (12) months from the Order Start Date. Upon expiration, Message Blocks automatically renew. * The date of delivery of software to the Customer is the date the software is made available to the Customer, either by delivery of software or delivery of first log-in to a hosted environment, which may be either a test or production environment. This date of delivery is frequently earlier than the dates professional services are completed, the Customer completes user acceptance testing, the Customer distributes additional logins to end-users, and the Customer go-live in a production environment.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FFAA84B-E438-41CE-B035-5797BB81E879 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 185 Invoice Timing and Delivery
Invoices are delivered electronically via e-mail to the billing contact on file for the Customer. Customer invoices are issued for the full amount of software and services purchased as follows:
Products Ordered Invoice Timing
Estimated Professional Services,
On-Site Professional Services, and
Travel Expenses*:
Monthly, in arrears for services in the prior month unless specified in Special Terms.
Fixed Fee Professional Services: The Effective Date of this Order Form unless specified in Special Terms.
Print Services and Transaction Fees: Monthly, in arrears for transactions in the prior month.
Hardware and One-Time Licenses: Upon the Effective Date of this Order Form.
Software Licenses, Subscriptions,
Maintenance,
and Hosting (New):
Annually in advance upon Order Start Date.
Software Licenses, Subscriptions,
Maintenance, and Hosting
(Renewal):
Sixty (60) days in advance of the Order Start Date.
Software Subscriptions, Maintenance,
and Hosting (Add-Ons):
Upon delivery of the product, order will be pro-rated to sync with the existing anniversary billing date and will renew annually thereafter.
Software Subscriptions (Migrations): Upon delivery of the product, order will be synced with the existing anniversary billing date and will renew annually thereafter unless specified in the Special Order Terms. This order replaces and supersedes any previously executed order as it relates to the products listed within this order. Upon delivery of new product, customer will receive a prorated credit for any prepaid, unused maintenance fees that will be applied to the customer’s first invoice.
* Professional Services pricing is based on expected hours using Springbrook’s standard implementation methodology. Actual hours and billings may vary from this estimate. Please note that only when project costs exceed $5,000 of this estimate, a signed change order will be required to continue work. Changes under $5,000 will continue to be delivered and billed accordingly. On-site Professional Services will be subject to a daily minimum rate irrespective of hours on-site. All travel costs associated with on-site travel will be billed as incurred.
Special Order Terms
Special Order Terms (if any):
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FFAA84B-E438-41CE-B035-5797BB81E879 Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 186 By signing, both parties agree to the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. * If the Customer requires a PO number on invoices, the Customer must provide Springbrook with the PO number and a copy of the PO prior to invoice issuance. If a PO number is not provided prior to the invoice issuance date, invoices issued on this Order Form will be valid without a PO reference.
Springbrook Holding Company, LLC Mount Shasta, CA - City of Signature:_________________________ Signature:__________________________ Name (Print):________________________ Name (Print):________________________ Title:_______________________________ Title:______________________________ Date:_______________________________ Date:_______________________________ Purchase Order # (if required)________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FFAA84B-E438-41CE-B035-5797BB81E879 2/27/2024
City Manager
Todd Juhasz
2/27/2024
Ryan James
Senior Vice President of Sales
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 187 Order Form: Q-32905-1
Date: 10/9/2024, 3:31 PM
Expires On: 11/23/2024
Phone: (866) 777-0069
Email: [email protected]
Ship To:
Jodi Polk
City of Mount Shasta
305 North Mount Shasta Boulevard
Mount Shasta, California 96067
[email protected]
Bill To:
Accounts Payable Mount Shasta, CA
City of Mount Shasta
305 North Mount Shasta Boulevard
Mount Shasta, California 96067
[email protected]
Account Manager E-mail Phone Number Payment Terms
Gary Kaber [email protected] 520-820-6167 Net 30
Annual Product Pricing
PRODUCT RATE QTY DISC (%) NET PRICE
Accounts Receivable Subscription USD 4,200.00 1 30.000 USD 2,940.00 Purchase Orders Subscription USD 4,700.00 1 30.000 USD 3,290.00 Annual Product Pricing Total: USD 6,230.00
Estimated Professional Services
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION LIST PRICE NET PRICE QTY DISC % NET PRICE Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 15 50.000 USD 1,800.00
Standard Professional
Services
Standard Professional
Services
USD 240.00 USD 120.00 15 50.000 USD 1,800.00
Estimated Professional Services Total: USD 3,600.00
Grand Total: USD 9,830.00
* excludes applicable sales tax
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 188 Order Details
Customer Name: City of Mount Shasta
Customer Contact: Jodi Polk
Governing Agreement(s): This Order Form is governed by the applicable terms found at:
MSA: https://sprbrk.app.box.com/v/sprbrk-saas-terms
MLA: https://sprbrk.app.box.com/v/sprbrk-onpremise-terms Professional Services: https://sprbrk.app.box.com/v/sprbrk-svcs-terms Term(s): 3 Years
Order Terms
In the event of an inconsistency between this Order Form, any governing agreement, purchase order, or invoice, the Order Form shall govern as it pertains to this transaction. • This Order Form shall become effective as of the last date of signature (the "Effective Date"). • Order Start Date: Software Licenses, Subscriptions, Maintenance, and Hosting commence upon the earlier of a) date of delivery* or log-in to hosted software to Customer; or b) 60 days after Order Form Effective Date. • Subscriptions, Maintenance, Hosting, and Support (“Recurring Services”) continue from the Order Start Date through the term listed in this Order Form (or if not listed, one (1) year). • Orders for Recurring Services auto-renew unless the Customer or Springbrook provides a written notice of non-renewal at least sixty (60) days before the end of the Order Term. • Subscription Service fees and any Recurring Services will be subject to an automatic annual increase by not more than five percent (5%) of the prior year’s Subscription Service fees ("Standard Annual Price Increase").
• Any Software Licenses or Hardware are one-time non-refundable purchases. • CivicPay Online Subscription fee and CivicPay IVR Subscription fee are subject to increase at per account rate, based on actual accounts.
• CivicPay IVR Message Block Subscriptions expire upon the earlier exhaustion of the Message Block or twelve (12) months from the Order Start Date. Upon expiration, Message Blocks automatically renew. * The date of delivery of software to the Customer is the date the software is made available to the Customer, either by delivery of software or delivery of first log-in to a hosted environment, which may be either a test or production environment. This date of delivery is frequently earlier than the dates professional services are completed, the Customer completes user acceptance testing, the Customer distributes additional logins to end-users, and the Customer go-live in a production environment.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 189 Invoice Timing and Delivery
Invoices are delivered electronically via e-mail to the billing contact on file for the Customer. Customer invoices are issued for the full amount of software and services purchased as follows:
Products Ordered Invoice Timing
Estimated Professional Services,
On-Site Professional Services, and
Travel Expenses*:
Monthly, in arrears for services in the prior month unless specified in Special Terms.
Fixed Fee Professional Services: The Effective Date of this Order Form unless specified in Special Terms.
Print Services and Transaction Fees: Monthly, in arrears for transactions in the prior month.
Hardware and One-Time Licenses: Upon the Effective Date of this Order Form.
Software Licenses, Subscriptions,
Maintenance,
and Hosting (New):
Annually in advance upon Order Start Date.
Software Licenses, Subscriptions,
Maintenance, and Hosting
(Renewal):
Sixty (60) days in advance of the Order Start Date.
Software Subscriptions, Maintenance,
and Hosting (Add-Ons):
Upon delivery of the product, order will be pro-rated to sync with the existing anniversary billing date and will renew annually thereafter.
Software Subscriptions (Migrations): Upon delivery of the product, order will be synced with the existing anniversary billing date and will renew annually thereafter unless specified in the Special Order Terms. This order replaces and supersedes any previously executed order as it relates to the products listed within this order. Upon delivery of new product, customer will receive a prorated credit for any prepaid, unused maintenance fees that will be applied to the customer’s first invoice.
* Professional Services time and material pricing is based on expected hours using Springbrook’s standard implementation approach.
While our goal is to provide accurate hour estimates, there may be variations in actual hours and charges. If project costs surpass the estimated hours within this order form by the greater of $15,000 or 20%, a signed change order is necessary to proceed. Adjustments under this threshold will be executed and invoiced accordingly. On-site professional services are subject to a daily minimum rate regardless of time spent on-site. Travel expenses related to on-site travel will be invoiced as they are incurred.
Special Order Terms
Special Order Terms (if any):
Upon execution of this order, the customer will no longer license the Project Management module, and the associated software fee for that module will be credited.
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 190 By signing, both parties agree to the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. * If the Customer requires a PO number on invoices, the Customer must provide Springbrook with the PO number and a copy of the PO prior to invoice issuance. If a PO number is not provided prior to the invoice issuance date, invoices issued on this Order Form will be valid without a PO reference.
Springbrook Holding Company, LLC City of Mount Shasta
Signature:_________________________ Signature:__________________________ Name (Print):________________________ Name (Print):________________________ Title:_______________________________ Title:______________________________ Date:_______________________________ Date:_______________________________ Purchase Order # (if required)________________________
Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 12, 2024 191