Mount Shasta City Council
June 8, 2026

“Our mission is to maintain the character of our “small town” community while striking an appropriate balance between economic development and preservation of our quality of life. We help create a dynamic and vital City by providing quality, cost-effective municipal services and by forming partnerships with residents and organizations in the constant pursuit of excellence.”
Page Item STANDING AGENDA ITEMS

1. Call to Order and Flag Salute

2. Roll call

3. Special Presentations & Announcements

4. Public Comment:

This time is set aside for citizens to address the City Council on matters listed on the Consent Agenda as well as other items not included on the Regular Agenda. If your comments concern an agenda item noted on the regular agenda, please address the Council when that item is open for public comment. Each speaker is allocated three (3) minutes to speak. Speakers may not cede their time. Comments should be limited to matters within the jurisdiction of the City. Council discussion or action cannot be taken on items not listed on the agenda other than to receive comments. If you have documents to present to members of Council, please provide a minimum of seven (7) copies to the Deputy City Clerk.

5. Council and Staff Comments

6. Committee Updates:
a) Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee
b) Library Tax Advisory Committee
c) Beautification Committee
d) Active Transportation Committee
There are currently several vacancies on advisory committees: two vacancies on the Beautification Committee, and one vacancy on the Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee.

Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Agenda
Mt. Shasta City Park Upper Lodge, 1315 Nixon Rd.

Monday, June 8th , 202 6, 5:30 p.m.

The meeting can also be viewed online at the
following link: MountShasta.22Ave.tv

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

7. Consent Agenda - The City Manager recommends approval of the following Consent Agenda items. All Resolutions and Ordinances on this agenda, or added hereto, shall be introduced or adopted, as applicable, by title only, and the full reading thereof is hereby waived. a. Approval of Minutes: May 27, 2026 regular City Council meeting b. Police Department Monthly Report

8. Sales Tax Percentage Selection
Background: On May 26, 2026, the Council adopted a resolution consolidating the City’s General Municipal Election with the Siskiyou County General Election. The resolution included authorization to place a sales tax measure on the ballot, but did not specify a tax rate.

Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommend that the City Council select the sales tax percentage to be placed on the November 3, 2026 ballot.

9. Sales Tax Ballot Measure Argument
Background: Staff has prepared a resolution to submit an argument in favor of a sales tax ballot measure to be included on the November 3, 2026 General Election ballot.

Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommend that the Council adopt a resolution directing that a ballot argument in favor of the City’s sales tax measure be placed on the November 3, 2026 General Election ballot.

10. Public Hearing: Noise Control Ordinance First Reading Background: Staff has prepared an ordinance consistent with the goals named in the Noise Element of the General Plan.

Report By: Robert Gibson, Chief of Police
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the ordinance creating Chapter 7.80 of the Municipal Code.

11. Extension of Ascension Aesthetic Contract
Background: The Chamber of Commerce, which owns the Visit Mt Shasta brand, has expressed interest in preparing an RFQ for digital marketing services to explore whether other firms provide better marketing and value.

Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommend that the Council authorize the City Manager to execute an extension of the agreement with The Ascension Aesthetic for digital marketing services.

Packet

Packet

Packet

Packet

Packet

12. Modification of Contract with Kimley-Horn
Background: In January 2026, the City contracted with Kimley-Horn for the reconstruction of Lake Street, including upgrades to water and sewer infrastructure. The proposed contract amendment increases the total contract cost to account for a revised scope of work.

Report By: Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommends that the Council approve Amendment #1 to the professional services agreement with Kimley-Horn for the Reconstruction of Lake Street Complete Streets Project.

13. Modification of Contract with Progression Engineering for Further Design Work Background: In June of 2025, the City contracted with Progression Engineering for improvements to storm drainage. The proposed contract amendment increases the total contract cost to account for a revised scope of work.

Report By: Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommends that the Council approve an amendment to the professional services agreement with Progression Engineering to add street improvements on South Washington Drive.

14. Local Transportation Fund Claim
Background: Staff has prepared a claim on behalf of the City for its annual allocation of transportation funding from the Local Transportation Commission.

Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommends that the Council adopt a resolution claiming the City’s apportionment of transportation funds.

15. Parks Lease Renewal
Background: The City’s lease agreement with the Mt. Shasta Recreation and Parks District for the use of the City Park Upper Lodge is due for renewal.

Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommend that the Council authorize the City Manager to execute a one-year renewal of the lease agreement between the City and the Mt. Shasta Recreation and Parks District.

Packet

Packet

Packet

Packet

16. Approval of Contract for Conceptual Master Plan: GHD Background: The City received 14 responses to its March 2026 Request for Proposals for a consultant team to prepare a Conceptual Master Plan for the property known as The Landing.

Report By: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
Recommended Council Action: Staff recommends that the City Council approve GHD’s contract for the development of a Conceptual Master Plan for “The Landing.”

CITY COUNCIL/STAFF REPORTING PERIOD

17. Council Reports on Attendance at Appointed/Outside Meetings

18. Future Agenda Items (Appearing on the agenda within 60-90 days): None a. Master Fee Schedule Review
b. Mobile Home Rent Stabilization
c. 2026 Sales Tax Ballot Measure
Future Agenda Items Over 90 Days: None

19. Adjourn
Availability of Public Records: All public records related to an open session item on this agenda, which are not exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act, that are distributed to a majority of the legislative body will be available for public inspection at City Hall located at 305 North Mt. Shasta Blvd., Mt. Shasta, CA at the same time the public records are distributed or made available to the members of the legislative body. Agenda related writings or documents provided to a majority of the legislative body after distribution of the Agenda packet will be available for public review within a separate binder at City Hall at the same time as they are made available to the members of the legislative body.

The City of Mt. Shasta does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age or disability in employment or provision of services. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons requiring accommodations for a disability at a public meeting should notify the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk at least 48 hours prior to the meeting at
(530) 926-7516 in order to allow the City sufficient time to make reasonable arrangements to accommodate participation in this meeting.

Packet

Contents
Consent Agenda…………………………………………………………………………….7
Approval of Minutes: May 16, 2026 Regular Meeting………….……….…………………..7 Police Department Monthly Report………………………….……….…………………11 Sales Tax Percentage Selection.……………………………………………………………21 Staff Report……….………………….…….……………………………………….21
Resolution…………….…………………………………………………………….23
Sales Tax Ballot Measure Argument………………………………………………………25 Staff Report………………………………………………………………………....25
Resolution…………………………………………………………………………..27
Public Hearing: Noise Ordinance………………………………………………………….29 Staff Report………………………………….……….………………………………29
Ordinance…………….……………………………………………………………...30
Ascension Aesthetics………………………………………………………………………39
Staff Report…………………………………………………………………………..39
Contract……………………………………………………………………………..40
Kimley-Horn Contract Amendment……………………………………………………….45
Staff Report…………………………………………………………………………..45
Exhibit A……………………………………………………………………………..55
Exhibit B……………………………………………………………………………..56
Progression Engineering Project Amendment……………………………………………..57 Staff Report…………………………………………………………………………..57
Additional Service Authorization………………………………………………………..58 Local Transportation Fund Claim………………………………………………………….71 Staff Report…………………………………………………………………………..71
Resolution…………………………………………………………………………….72
Claim………………………………………………………………………………...73
Parks Lease Renewal……………………………………………………………………….75
Staff Report…………………………………………………………………………...75
Agreement…………………………………………………………………………….76
Approval of Contract for Conceptual Master Plan…………………………………………89 Staff Report…………………………………………………………………………...89
Proposal……………………………………………………………………………...92
Revised Scope of Work and Fee…………………………………………………………141
Agreement……………………………………………………………………………144
Page Item STANDING AGENDA ITEMS

1. Call to Order and Flag Salute
At the hour of 5:29pm, Mayor Glaubman called the meeting to order and led the audience in the flag salute.

2. Roll call
Council Members Present: Collings, Clure, Stackfleth, Redmond, Glaubman Council Members Absent: None

3. Special Presentations & Announcements: None

4. Public Comment:

Baruch Nevar – Comments regarding safety at the City Park.

Aurea – Comments regarding safety at the City Park, invites the public to attend Ohana Connect event.

Afa – Comments regarding safety at the City Park.

Joan Roamer – Comments regarding Councilmember Redmond’s remarks at May 11th City Council meeting.

Roslyn McCoy – Comments in favor of redirecting advertising budget; comments regarding July 4th celebration and vendor policy, tourism.

Therese Swensen – Comments regarding safety at the City Park, comments regarding Councilmember Redmond’s remarks, comments regarding development and sale of the Landing.

5. Council and Staff Comments
Councilmember Stackfleth – Comments regarding July 4th celebrations.

Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Comments regarding July 4th celebrations, Chamber of Commerce.

Councilmember Clure – Suggests five-minute break to resolve sound issues.

Council and staff perform microphone tests.

Mayor Glaubman – Comments regarding development and sale of the Landing.

Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Comments regarding development and sale of the Landing.

Robert Gibson, Chief of Police – Comments regarding safety at public parks, answers staff questions.

Mt. Shasta City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
Mt. Shasta City Park Upper Lodge, 1315 Nixon Rd.

Tuesday, May 26th , 2026 , 5:30 p.m.
7 6. Committee Updates:
a) Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee
b) Library Tax Advisory Committee
c) Beautification Committee
d) Active Transportation Committee
There are currently several vacancies on advisory committees: two vacancies on the Beautification Committee, and one vacancy on the Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee.

Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director – Reports on Beautification Committee activities, purchase of new planters, repair of clock.

Todd Juhasz, City Manager – (Staff comments): Comments regarding reprogramming of Prop 68 funds, development effort at the Landing, answers Council questions.

CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS

7. Consent Agenda - The City Manager recommends approval of the following Consent Agenda items. All Resolutions and Ordinances on this agenda, or added hereto, shall be introduced or adopted, as applicable, by title only, and the full reading thereof is hereby waived. a. Approval of Minutes: May 11, 2026 regular City Council meeting; May 18th, 2026 special City Council meeting
b. Approval of Disbursements: Accounts Payable 4/27/26, 5/5/2026, and 5/13/2026; Total Gross Payroll and Taxes: For the Periods Ending 4/30/2026 and 5/13/2026 c. Professional Services Agreement: Craig Johnson Surveying MOTION TO APPROVE: Councilmember Stackfleth
SECOND: Councilmember Clure
AYES: Collings, Clure, Stackfleth, Redmond, Glaubman
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
8 8. Public Hearing: FY 2026/27 Budget
Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Comments regarding preparation of budget, thanks Malisa Dodd, Finance Director, and Finance Committee; provides overview of proposed FY 2026/27 budget.

Malisa Dodd, Finance Director – Introduces Dani Williams, Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee.

Dani Williams, Downton Enhancement Advisory Committee – Presents FY 2026/27 budget proposal, answers Council questions.

Evelyn Callas, Friends of the Library Board Secretary – Presents FY 2026/27 budget proposal.

Malisa Dodd, Finance Director – Provides update on revenue.

Councilmember Stackfleth – Notes error on packet page 55.

Public Comment:

Roslyn McCoy – Asks clarifying question.

Therese Swensen – Asks clarifying question.

Afa – Thanks staff and Finance Committee, comments in favor of monthly revenue projections rather than quarterly; thanks Downtown Enhancement Advisory Committee, Library personnel.

Council Comment:

Councilmember Clure – Comments in favor of budget as presented thus far, barring error on packet page 55.

Councilmember Stackfleth – Asks clarifying question.

Council discusses.

Kim Fowler, Planning Director – Provides presentation on Planning and Building Department functions and activities.

Cory Burns, Fire Chief – Reports on Fire Department functions and activities.

Robert Gibson, Chief of Police – Reports on Police Department functions and activities.

Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director – Reports on Public Works department equipment and staffing, and ongoing and upcoming projects.

Councilmember Clure – Thanks department heads for their work and for identifying budget cuts; comments regarding budget review proceedings.

Councilmember Collings – Comments regarding proposed budget, thanks staff.

Public Comment:

Therese Swensen – Asks questions regarding emergency response training programs, sidewalk improvements; comments regarding sales tax ballot measure marketing.

Council discusses.
9 MOTION: Councilmember Stackfleth moves to amend the current budget to take into account reduced projected revenues that will then entail an appropriate reduction in cost to lead to a balanced projected budget for 2026-27
SECOND: Redmond
AYES: Collings, Clure, Stackfleth, Redmond, Glaubman
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Councilmember Redmond and Councilmember Clure excuse themselves at 7:55pm.

9. Election Consolidation
Todd Juhasz, City Manager – Comments regarding consolidation of elections.

Public Comment:

Roslyn McCoy – Comments in opposition to sales tax ballot measure.

Councilmember Stackfleth – Clarifies cost of preparing ballot measure.

Therese Swensen – Comments regarding sales tax ballot measure messaging.

MOTION: Stackfleth moves to approve resolution number CCR-26-08, A Resolution of the City of Mt. Shasta, California Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of Siskiyou to Consolidate A Municipal Election For An Increase In The Transaction And Use Tax (Sales Tax) And The Election of Two Members of The City Council With The General Election To Be Held On November 3rd, 2026, The Date Pursuant to Government Code §10403 of the Election Code.

SECOND: Collings
AYES: Collings, Stackfleth, Glaubman
NOES: None
ABSENT: Clure, Redmond
ABSTAIN: None

CITY COUNCIL/STAFF REPORTING PERIOD

10. Council Reports on Attendance at Appointed/Outside Meetings

11. Future Agenda Items (Appearing on the agenda within 60-90 days): None a. Master Fee Schedule Review
b. Mobile Home Rent Stabilization
c. 2026 Sales Tax Ballot Measure
Future Agenda Items Over 90 Days: None

12. Adjourn: There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:03pm. 10 Department Statistics
Calls for Service May 2025 May 2026 Change
678 676 -0.29%
Cases Taken May 2025 May 2026 Change
34 39 +14.70%
Arrests Made May 2025 May 2026 Change
13 8 -38.46%
678
752 724
588 582 552 515 501 453 495
657
501
676
0 200
400
600
800
Calls for Service
Calls for Service
34 37 36 31 33
39 30 30 28
37 29 25
39 0
10 20
30 40
50 Cases Taken
Cases Taken
13 8
13 7
18 15 14
10 12
15 11 11
8 0
5 10
15 20
Arrests Made
Arrests Made
11 Warrant Arrests May 2025 May 2026 Change
4 4 0%
Top 5 Calls
May 2025 May 2026
Outside Assist 62 Out w/a Vehicle 26
Out w/a Vehicle 29 Outside Assist 21
Alarm 18 Out w/a Person 21
Medical 17 Medical 18
Trespassing 15 Suspicious Circumstances 18
4 3
1 4
6 4
5 0
6 7
4 4 4
0 2
4 6
8 Warrant Arrests
Warrant Arrests
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
5/1/2025
6/1/2025
7/1/2025
8/1/2025
9/1/2025
10/1/2025
11/1/2025
12/1/2025
1/1/2026
2/1/2026
3/1/2026
4/1/2026
5/1/2026
Yearly Top 5 Calls 2025-2026
Animal Complaint Disturbing the Peace Suspicious Circumstances Suspicious Vehicle Suspicious Person 12 Crime Statistics
Crimes
May 2025 May 2026 Change May 2025- May 2026
Yearly Total
Assault – Physical 4 1 -75% 35
Assault – Verbal 0 2 +100% 25
Disturbing the Peace 8 7 -12.5% 129
Domestic Disturbance 0 3 +100% 15
Domestic Violence 1 1 0% 12
Fraud 0 2 +100% 8
Public Intoxication 2 1 -50% 16
Stolen Vehicle 0 1 +100% 4
TC Hit & Run 2 2 0% 17
Theft from Vehicle 0 0 0% 4
Theft – Grand 0 0 0% 10
Theft – Petty 3 2 -33.33% 35
Theft – Shoplifting 0 0 0% 4
Trespassing 15 18 +20% 174
Vandalism 4 6 +50% 40
4 4 4 4 4
1 3
4 2 2 2
0 1 0
2 4
6 Assault - Physical
Assault - Physical
0 3 3
5 5
1 1
0 2
0 3
0 2
0 2
4 6
Assault - Verbal
Assault - Verbal
8 13
18 12
19 10 7 6 8 7 10
4 7
0 10
20 Disturbing the Peace
Disturbing the Peace
13 0 0
3 0
2 2
0 1
0 0
2 2
3 0
2 4
Domestic Disturbance
Domestic Disturbance
1 0
1 2 2
1 1 1
0 0
1 1 1
0 1
2 3
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence
0 1
0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0
1 1
2 0
1 2
3 Fraud
Fraud
2 0
4 0
1 3
2 0
1 0
2 0
1 0
2 4
6 Public Intoxication
Public Intoxication
0 1
0 0
1 0
1 0 0 0 0 0
1 0

0.5 1

1.5 Stolen Vehicles
Stolen Vehicles
14 2
0 2
0 0
2 4
1 0 0
1 3
2 0
2 4
6 Traffic Collisions - Hit & Run
Traffic Collisions - Hit & Run
0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0
1 0
2 0 0 0
1 2
3 Theft from Vehicle
Theft from Vehicle
0 3
0 1
3 0 0
1 1
0 0
1 0 0
2 4
Theft - Grand
Theft - Grand
0 2
0 5 4 5 6
1 1
4 3 2 2
0 5
10 Theft - Petty
Theft - Petty
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
2 1
0 0 0
1 2
3 Theft - Shoplifting
Theft - Shoplifting
15 15 16 19
9 12 12 10
14 8
15 17
9 18
0 10
20 Trespassing
Trespassing
4 1
3 5
4 0
3 22
55 0
6 05
10 Vandalism
Vandalism
16 Traffic Summary
May 2025 May 2026 Change
Traffic Stops 62 112 +80.64%
Traffic Citations Issued 12 8 -33.33%
Traffic Collisions
May 2025 May 2026 Change May 2025- May 2026
Yearly Total
TC – DUI 0 0 0% 2
TC – Hit & Run 2 2 0% 18
TC – Info Exchange 1 4 +300% 42
TC - Injury 0 0 0% 6
Total 3 7 133% 68
62 73
49 80
55 72 79 73 64 63
98 92
112
12 27
2 27
15 10 9
22 28
16 22
10 8 0
20 40
60 80
100
120
Traffic Stops
11-95 Traffic Citations Issued
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 1
0 0 0 0
2 0
2 0 0
2 4
1 0
1 1
3 2
1 5
4 5
4 2
3 3
7 1
3 0
4 0
1 0
1 2
0 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
Traffic Collisions
TC - DUI Hit & Run TC - Info Exchange TC - Injury
17 DUI Summary
May 2025 May 2026 Change
DUI Complaints NA NA NA
DUI Arrests 1 0 -100%
* DUI Complaints no longer tracked in new CAD system as of 11/01/2022.

Patrol Information
Foot Patrol
May 2025 May 2026 Change May 2025- May
2026 Yearly Total
15 21 +40% 191
Frequent foot patrol areas include:
• City Park
• Shastice Park
• Downtown Mount Shasta
• Roseburg Property
• Behind commercial business
such as Ray’s Food Place, the
Cinema, and Rite Aid
• Dense brush areas in multiple
residential areas.
1 1
0 0
3 2
1 2
1 1 1
4 0 0
1 2
3 4
5 DUI Summary
DUI Complaints DUI Arrests
15 19
31 11 16 13
5 13
6 8
18 15 21
0 20
40 Foot Patrol
Foot Patrol
18 Municipal Summary
Municipal Calls for Service
May 2025 May 2026 May 2025- May 2026
Yearly Total
Muni Code – Other 10 12 102
Muni Code - Parking 9 6 96
Total 19 18 198
LiveScans May 2025 May 2026
23 13
Court Activity
10 5
19 8 9 10 9
1 4 4 3
8 12
9 7
13 11
6 9
6 1
8 8
11 1
6 0
5 10
15 20
Municipal Calls for Service
Muni Code - Other Muni Code - Parking
4 3
0 1 2 1 2 1 0
3 3
0 0 0
5 Court Activity
Court Activity
19 Social Media
Facebook
Followers Posts Reach Engaged Users Reactions
16,842 13 623,085 1150 8904
Twitter
Followers Tweets Impressions Mentions
390 0 0 0
Instagram
Followers Posts Likes
2679 11 9628
Nextdoor
Posts Impressions Reactions
0 0 0
20 City Council Agenda Item #8
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
SUBJECT: Consolidation of City of Mt. Shasta General Municipal Election with Siskiyou County General Election – November 3, 2026
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council select the sales tax percentage to be placed on the November 3, 2026 ballot and provide direction to staff for finalizing ballot measure language and required filings.

BACKGROUND:

At its May 26, 2026 meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution consolidating the City of Mt.

Shasta General Municipal Election with the Siskiyou County General Election on November 3, 2026. That resolution included authorization to place a sales tax measure on the ballot but did not specify the tax rate.

Staff note that the deadline to submit consolidation paperwork with the County Election Clerk is July 1, 2026. Timely action at this meeting is necessary to meet that deadline.

DISCUSSION:

The following information is provided to assist the Council in weighing the relevant factors ahead of selecting a sales tax percentage.

Polling conducted at the start of this effort showed a one-cent measure passing with 73% support, while a one-and-a-half-cent measure was projected to pass at just over 50%. Since then, the City has collectively worked to build public support for the higher amount, but there is no reliable way to measure how much, if at all, that effort has moved voter sentiment.

On the positive side, the City has held two sales tax town halls, with a third scheduled before the election. At both events, supporters of the one-and-a-half-cent measure appeared to outnumber detractors. This is an encouraging sign, though not a scientific measure of broader public opinion.

Two additional risk factors are worth keeping in mind:

X Regular
Consent
Closed
Presentation
21 1. According to William Berry of WBC Campaigns, a formal argument against the measure from an influential community member could reduce yes votes by as much as seven percentage points.

2. Consumer sentiment remains negative and the broader economy continues to be unpredictable, representing a headwind for passing any new tax measure.

Ultimately, the strength of the City’s position on November 3rd will depend in part on whether the Council arrives at this meeting unified behind the same number. A divided presentation weakens public confidence and invites opposition.

Finally and most importantly, the City has been transparent about the need for a one and a half percent measure to ensure that we have funding into the future for fire, police, 911 services, and equipment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact will depend on the rate selected. Current estimates indicate that a one-cent sales tax is estimated to generate approximately $1.5m per year. A one-and-a-half-cent measure would generate an estimated $2.25m.
22 RESOLUTION CCR-26-XX

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA

CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026 AND REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION

OFTHIS ELECTION WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities of the State and California and the City of Mt. Shasta, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 3, 2026 for the election of certain municipal officers; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Elections Code, the City Council of the City of Mt.

Shasta calls and gives notice of the General Municipal Election; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the National General Election to be held on the same date, and that within the City, the precincts, polling places, and elections officers of the two elections be the same, and that the County Clerk's Office of the County of Siskiyou canvass the returns of the Presidential General Election and that this Election be held in all respects as if there were only one Election.

NOW THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1: Pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities, there is called ordered to be held in the City of Mt. Shasta on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing two (2) Members of the City Council to four-year full terms.

Section 2: The polls for the election shall be open at 7:00 a.m. on the day of the election and shall remain open continuously until 8:00 p.m. when the polls shall be closed pursuant to Elections Code Section 10242, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code.

Section 3: Notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the County Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law.

Section 4: Pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Siskiyou is herby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of the City of Mt. Shasta General Municipal Election with the Presidential General Election to be held on November 3, 2026.

Section 5: That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the County Clerk's Office Elections Division to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of a consolidated election, including candidate filing.
23 Section 6: That the County Clerk’s Office is authorized and instructed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies and equipment and other necessary items in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

Section 7: That the County Clerk's Office is authorized to canvass the returns of the Election.

The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used.

Section 8: That the City of Mt. Shasta recognizes that additional cost will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs that are not reimbursed by the State.

Section 9: That the Deputy City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resol ution with the Board of Supervisors and County Clerk' s Office of the County of Siskiyou.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta held on the 8th day of June 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: June 8, 2026
CITY OF MT. SHASTA
_____________________________
Casey Glaubman, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Rachel Agron, Deputy City Clerk
.
24 City Council Agenda Item #9
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
SUBJECT: Resolution Placing Sales Tax Measure Argument on the November 3, 2026 Ballot
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council adopt the attached resolution directing that a ballot argument in favor of the City’s sales tax measure be placed on November 3, 2026 General Election ballot, with the sales tax percentage to be consistent with the rate selected by the Council under a separate agenda item earlier in this meeting.

BACKGROUND:

At its May 26, 2026, meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution consolidating the City of Mt.

Shasta General Municipal Election with the Siskiyou County General Election on November 3, 2026, and authorized the placement of a transactions and use (sales) tax measure on that ballot.

The measure, if approved by a majority of voters, would establish a general tax to fund vital City services, including Police, Fire, wildfire protection, 911 emergency response, and general governmental operations. Revenue would remain within Mount Shasta and be subject to annual audits and citizen oversight.

DISCUSSION:

The attached resolution (Resolution No. ___) formally requests that the Siskiyou County Election Clerk place the City’s ballot argument in favor of the sales tax measure on the November 3, 2026, ballot. The key elements of the resolution are as follows:
• Ballot Question: Asks voters whether the City should adopt an ordinance imposing a transactions and use tax at a rate of ___% (to be filled in based on action taken earlier this meeting) to fund Police, Fire, wildfire protection, 911 emergency response, and general governmental services, with all funds legally required to stay in Mount Shasta. • Tax Type: General Tax – requires a simple majority vote for adoption.

X Regular
Consent
Closed
Presentation
25 • Accountability: The measure includes provisions for annual independent audits and citizen oversight.
• Administration: The tax would be administered and collected by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), consistent with state law. • Operative Date: The tax would take effect on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 110 days after adoption of the implementing ordinance. • Termination: The tax remains in effect until repealed or amended by voter action.

The resolution also requests that the Board of Supervisors of Siskiyou County consent to the consolidation of the City’s municipal election with the county-wide General Election on November 3, 2026.

Note: The actual sales tax percentage reflected in the ballot question and the implementing ordinance (Exhibit “A”) will be inserted following the Council’s vote on the tax rate under a separate agenda item earlier this meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The fiscal impact will depend on the rate selected by the Council earlier in this meeting. Current estimates indicate that a one-cent (1%) sales tax would generate approximately $1.5 million annually, while a one-and-a-half-cent (1.5%) measure would generate an estimated $2.25 million annually. All revenues would be deposited into the City’s General Fund.

ATTACHMENTS:
• Resolution No. ___ – Resolution Placing Sales Tax Measure on the November 3, 2026 Ballot
26 RESOLUTION NO. ---

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA

REQUESTING THE ELECTION CLERK OF THE COUNTY OF SISKIYOU TO PLACE ON THE NOVEMBER 3, 2026 BALLOT A MEASURE TO ADOPT A SALES

AND TRANSACTION TAX AS A GENERAL TAX REQUIRING A MAJORITY VOTE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mount Shasta desires to place on the November 3, 2026 Ballot a ballot measure to authorize the imposition of a ____% sales tax; and WHEREAS, the ballot measure (Exhibit "A" attached) is a General Tax with revenues to be used to prevent reductions in Police and Fire Protection, wildfire protection, and other necessary general governmental services and requiring a majority vote for adoption; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mount Shasta dos hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:

Section 1: The City Council requests that the following question be placed on the November 3, 2026 Ballot:

City of Mount Shasta Vital Services Protection Measure:

To prevent cuts to its Police and Fire Departments, maintain public safety, YES prevent and protect against wildfires, provide rapid responses to 911 emergencies, add needed police officers, firefighters, and paramedics, and for general government use, shall the City of Mount Shasta adopt an ordinance NO establishing a one and a half cent sales ( transactions and use) tax, providing approximately one million eight hundred thousand dollars annually until ended by voters, with strict accountability, annual audits, citizen oversight, and all funds legally required to stay in Mount Shasta?
Section 2: In all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

Section 3: After a legally noticed public hearing the City Council by a two-thirds vote ordered the following ordinance be placed on the November 3, 2026 Ballot:

MEASURE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE

VOTERS MEASURE -----
Exhibit "A"
(attached) A General Tax
Page I of 2
27 Section 4: The County Clerk of the County of Siskiyou is authorized, instructed and directed to give all appropriate and convenient notice of the election, inform, time and manner as prescribed by law.

Section 5: The Board of Supervisors is requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of the City of Mount Shasta municipal election with the General Election to be held on November 3, 2026.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of May, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED:

ATTEST:

Rachel Agron, Deputy City Clerk

CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA
Casey Glaubman, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

John S. Kenny, City Attorney

28 City Council Agenda Item #10
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Gibson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Noise Control Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff respectfully request the City Council approve the ordinance creating chapter 7.80, Noise Control in the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code.

BACKGROUND & SUMMARY:

The proposed ordinance is required by the Mt. Shasta General Plan Noise Element, implementation action N2–1.1 (a) to “enact a noise control ordinance” and N2-3.1 to “amend the Municipal Code.” The proposed code text is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan, and the proposed code amendment promotes public health, safety and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code. The proposed code amendment will establish criteria for managing noise complaints in the City limits. Currently there is not mechanism to address noise complaints within the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code, nor are there any time restrictions found within the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code. The only remedy available to a citizen regarding noise was the use of the California Penal Code Section 415 disturbing the peace and required a citizen to file a formal arrest complaint.

ATTACHMENTS:

Ordinance 7.80
X Regular
Consent
Closed
Presentation
29 ORDINANCE CCO-26-XX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA CREATING CHAPTER 7.80 OF THE MT. SHASTA MUNICIPAL CODE

NOISE CONTROL
The City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta does hereby ordain as follows:

Section 1. Findings and Purpose.

The City Council finds and declares as follows:

A. The proposed code is required by the Mt. Shasta General Plan Noise Element, implementation action N2–1.1 (a) to “enact a noise control ordinance” and N2-3.1 to “amend the Municipal Code”.

B. The proposed code text is consistent with the goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan.

C. The proposed code amendment promotes public health, safety and general welfare and serves the goals and purposes of the zoning code.

D. The proposed code amendment will establish criteria for managing noise complaints in the City limits.

E. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on this ordinance on DATE, 2026, at which time it considered all evidence presented, both written and oral.

Section 2. Enactment. The Mt. Shasta Municipal Code Chapter 7.80 is hereby amended to read as follows:
30 Chapter 7.80
Noise Control
Sections:

7.80.010 Purpose

7.80.020 Definitions

7.80.030 Noise Standards

7.80.040 Exempt Noise Sources and Activities

7.80.050 Administration and Enforcement

7.80.060 Sound Measurement

7.80.010 Policy and Purpose
(A) The City declares that:
(1) Certain noise levels under certain circumstances may be excessive, harmful, annoying, or otherwise detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the City’s residents.
(2) Ordinary and usual sounds, noise, and commotion that emanate from a property, dwelling, place of business, or other structure, or upon any public street, park, or other place, in accordance with usual standards of practice, are not typically considered to be excessive, harmful, or annoying, or otherwise an unreasonable disturbance of health, safety, and welfare.
(B) The purpose of this Chapter is to define citywide standards for the control of noise from certain sources located, and certain activities occurring, within the city limits.

7.80.020 Definitions
For the purposes of this Chapter, the following words and phrases shall mean:
(A) “Ambient Noise” means the all-encompassing noise level associated with a given environment at a given time or period.
(B) “Construction” means any demolition or dismantling, clearing or site preparation, grading, excavation, pile driving, trenching, building assembly or fabrication, or paving work, including the substantial repair or alteration of existing structures. (C) “Cumulative Period” means a total period of time composed of segments which may be continuous or discontinuous.
(D) “Decibel” means a unit of sound measurement that is ten times the logarithm of the squared ratio of sound pressure (or sound power) to a reference sound pressure (or sound power), with the standardized reference pressure of 0 dB equal to 20 micro Pascals. 31 (E) “Decibel, A-Weighted (dBA),” means the sound level, in decibels, measured with a sound level meter use a frequency response adjustment that approximates typical human hearing characteristic in accordance with American National Standards Institute Specification for Sound Level Meters, ANSI S-XYZ, or most recent ANSI standard equivalent.
(F) “Equivalent Noise Level, or Leq” is the steady-state sound level that has the same total acoustic energy as the time-varying sound level for a given measurement period (G) “Fixed Noise Source” means a device, machine, piece of equipment, or similar which creates sound from a fixed or stationary position, including, but not limited to, pumps, fans, compressors, condensers, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment, mechanical lifts, loading and unloading docks, and sound amplification equipment. (H) “Noise Sensitive Outdoor Area” means the following with regard to specific land uses:
(1) Residential and Transient Lodging: rear yards and common outdoor passive recreation areas, such as pools and picnic areas
(2) All other uses: Clearly defined areas designated for respite/relaxation by employees, students/staff, visitors, patron/congregants, patients, etc. (I) “Residential Noise Zone” means a defined area where the ambient noise levels are generally similar, including:
(1) “Residential Noise Zone 1” means all residential properties, or parts of properties, located within 500 feet of the center of the Interstate 5 right-of-way or 1,000 feet of the center of the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. (2) “Residential Noise Zone 2” means all other residential properties, or parts of properties, in the city.
(J) “Sound Level Meter” means a device for measuring sound levels, in dB, that meets or exceeds performance specifications for Class 2 sound level meters established in the American National Standards Institute Standard S1.4-2014, or most recent revision thereof.

7.80.030 Noise Standards
(A) Exterior Noise Limits
(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to allow, cause, or create the operation of a fixed noise source to exceed the acceptable exterior noise level of the applicable land use category listed in Table 7.80.030-1 as follows:
(a) The acceptable level plus up to 5 dB for a cumulative period of more than 30 minutes in any hour.
(b) The acceptable level plus up to 10 dB for a cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour.
(c) The acceptable level plus up to 15 dB for a cumulative period more than 1 minute in any hour.
32 (d) The acceptable level plus up to 20 dB at any time. (2) If the measured hourly exterior ambient noise level exceeds the base acceptable noise level, the base acceptable noise level shall be increased in 5 dB increments to encompass the ambient noise level.
(B) Interior Noise Limits
(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to allow, cause, or create the operation of a fixed noise source to exceed the acceptable interior noise level of the applicable land use category listed in Table 7.80.030-2 as follows:
(a) The acceptable level plus up to 5 dB for a cumulative period of more than 5 minutes in any hour.
(b) The acceptable level plus up to 10 dB for a cumulative period of more than 1 minute in any hour.
(c) The acceptable level plus up to 15 dB at any time.

Table 7.80.030-1: Acceptable Exterior Noise Levels (dBA Leq)(A) Land Use Type
Day
(7:00 AM to
10:00 PM)
Night
(10:00 PM to
7:00 AM)
Residential Noise Zone 1 60 50
Residential Noise Zone 2 50 45
Transient Lodging 65 55
Schools, Libraries, Churches 60 50
Hospitals and Nursing Care 60 45
Playgrounds, Parks 65 65
Office Buildings, Business
Commercial, and Professional 65 65
Industrial, Manufacturing,
Utilities, Agriculture 70 70
(A) Exterior noise level standards are applied at noise-sensitive outdoor areas as defined in Section 7.80.010 (H).

Table 7.80.030-2: Acceptable Interior Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Land Use Type Day and Night
Residential – Zone 1 40
Residential – Zone 2 40
Transient Lodging 45
Schools, Libraries, Churches, etc. 40
Hospitals and Nursing Care 45
33 (2) If the measured hourly interior ambient noise level exceeds the base acceptable noise level, the base acceptable noise level shall be increased in 5 dB increments to encompass the ambient noise level.
(C) General Noise Regulation
(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section and in addition thereto, no person shall willfully or negligently make or continue, or cause to be made or continued, any loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise which disturbs the peace and quiet of any neighborhood or which causes any discomfort or annoyance to any reasonable person of normal sensitivity residing in the area. The factors that shall be considered when determining when a violation of this section exists include, but shall not be limited to:
(a) The ambient noise level with and without the alleged offensive noise source.
(b) The nature and use of the area from which the objectionable noise emanates and is received, and whether such noise is usual or unusual for such areas.
(c) The time of day or night the noise occurs.
(d) The duration of the noise.
(e) Whether the noise is continuous, recurrent, intermittent, or impulsive. (D) Specific Prohibitions. The following acts are prohibited in the City:
(1) The use of exhaust brakes (jake brakes), except in an emergency or except when used by a person operating an emergency services vehicle equipped with a muffled compression breaking system, is prohibited at all times within the city, regardless of noise level.
(2) The excessive sound of any horn or signal device or any other device on any automobile, motorcycle, truck bus or other vehicle while in motion except as a danger signal.
(3) The use of any automobile, motorcycle or other vehicle so out of repair, without a proper exhaust system, or in such a manner as to create loud or unnecessary sounds, grating, grinding, rattling or other noise.
(4) The use of any automobile, motorcycle, all-terrain vehicle or other vehicle outside of the public right-of-way where the use is unnecessarily loud.

Table 7.80.030-2: Acceptable Interior Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Land Use Type Day and Night
Theaters and Auditoriums 35
Office Buildings, Business
Commercial, and Professional 50
(A) Interior noise level standards apply in habitable areas of structures with windows closed.
34 (5) Any yelling, shouting, hooting, whistling, singing or other human-produced noise that is unnecessarily loud.

7.80.040 Exempt Noise Sources and Activities
The following sources and activities are exempt from the requirements of this Chapter:
(A) Emergency Work. Sounds caused by emergency work or by the ordinary and accepted use of emergency equipment, and sounds caused by appropriate use of emergency warning devices and alarm systems for no more than 15 minutes or while the emergency remains in effect.
(B) Construction activities. Sounds made by construction activities, provided such activities occur more than 500 feet from noise-sensitive outdoor areas or, if occurring within 500 feet of such areas, provided such activities do not occur between the hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM on weekdays, 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM on Saturdays, or at any time on a Sunday or federal holiday.
(C) Community Events. Sounds created by community events, such as parades, public fireworks displays, street fairs, and festivals, provided such event begins no earlier than 7:00 AM and ends no later than 11:00 PM.
(D) Organized Athletic and Group Activities. Amplified and non-amplified sound created by organized athletic or other group activities, provided:
(1) The activities are conducted on property generally used for such activity, such as, but not limited to, stadiums, parks, schools, and athletic fields; and (2) The activities occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. (E) Minor Landscaping and Property Maintenance. Sounds caused by air, electrical, or gas driven domestic power tools, including landscaping equipment, provided such equipment is operated between the hours of 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM.
(F) Snow or Ice Removal. Sounds made by the removal of snow or ice from public or private property.
(G) City Activities. Sounds made by the cleaning or routine maintenance of City streets by City employees or agents.
(H) Waste Collection. Sounds made by waste collection services pursuant to Chapter 6.04 of this Code.
(I) Special Events authorized pursuant to Chapter 7.30 of this Code. (J) Variances. Any activity which the director or planning commission, as part of a use permit approval, authorizes exceptions to this title.
(K) Preemption. Sounds regulated by state or federal law, including, but not limited to, sounds caused by railroads, motor vehicle travel, or aircraft. 35 7.80.050 Administration and Enforcement
(A) Enforcement. This ordinance shall be enforced by Mt. Shasta Police Department Office of Code Enforcement. It shall be the responsibility of the Office of Code Enforcement to enforce the provisions of this Chapter and to perform all functions required by this Chapter that are not expressly assigned to another responsible official. (B) Violations. Any person violating the provisions of this Chapter shall be deemed guilty of an infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined in an amount not to exceed the maximums established in Government Code Section 36900(b). Each hour that a violation is repeated or is permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such.
(1) Any noise exceeding the noise level limits identified in Section 7.80.030 (A),

7.80.030 (B), or Section 7.80.030 (C) shall be deemed prima facie violation of this Chapter.
(2) Noise from a prohibited source identified in Section 7.80.030 (D) shall pe deemed a per se violation of this Chapter.

7.80.060 Sound Measurement
(A) Any sound or noise level measurement made to enforce this chapter shall be measured with a sound level meter, as defined in Section 7.80.030 (J), using the A-weighted scale, at slow response, with the meter stable and positioned between three and five feet above the grade where the measurement is made.
(1) Exterior noise level measurements shall be at the position or positions along the complainant’s noise sensitive outdoor area closest to the noise source or where the noise source is loudest. If possible and necessary, ambient noise measurements shall be made with and without the objectional noise source in operation. (2) Interior measurements shall be made at a point at least four feet from the wall, ceiling, or floor nearest the noise source with windows closed. (B) Violations. Any person violating the provisions of this Chapter shall be deemed guilty of an infraction and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined in an amount not to exceed the maximums established in Government Code Section 36900(b). Each hour that a violation is repeated or is permitted to continue shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such.
(1) Any noise exceeding the noise level limits identified in Section 7.80.030 (A),

7.80.030 (B), or Section 7.80.030 (C) shall be deemed prima facie violation of this Chapter.
36 Section 3. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be interpreted to mean that the City’s zoning scheme allows any other use not specifically listed therein.

Section 4. CEQA. This ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15061(b)(3) which is the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment.

Section 5. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 6. To the extent the provisions of the Mt. Shasta Municipal Code as amended by this Ordinance are substantially the same as the provisions of that Code as they read immediately prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, then those provisions shall be construed as continuations of the earlier provisions and not as new enactments.

Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause a summary thereof to be published within fifteen (15) days of adoption and shall post a certified copy of this Ordinance, including the vote for and against same, in the Office of the City Clerk, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ____________, 2026.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________________
Casey Glaubman, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Rachel Argon, Deputy City Clerk
37 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________________
John Sullivan Kenny, City Attorney
38 City Council Agenda Item #11
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
SUBJECT: Extension of the Current Contract with Visit Mt Shasta RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute an extension of the Contract for Services between the City of Mt Shasta and The Ascension Aesthetic (TAA) for digital marketing services for the Visit Mount Shasta brand, covering the period of July 1, 2026 through August 31, 2026, at a monthly rate of $3,200.00, totaling $6,400.00 BACKGROUND:

The City of Mt. Shasta has worked with the Ascension Aesthetic (TAA) digital marketing services for the Visit Mount Shasta Brand. Services under the agreement include Facebook and Instagram management, website maintenance and SEO, YouTube channel management, paid ad campaign management, and quarterly analytics reporting.

The Chamber of Commerce, the owner of the Visit Mt Shasta brand, has expressed a desire to prepare an RFP/RFQ seeking firms that provide similar services to that of the Ascension Aesthetics to see if there are firms that provide better value and/or services. Staff proposed extending the agreement that expires on June 30th through August 31st so that the Chamber can issue and RFP/RFQ and then review submissions.

DISCUSSION:

The current contract term runs through August 31, 2026. Staff are recommending that the City Council ratify and authorize execution of this contract extension to ensure continuity of digital marketing services for the Visit Mount Shasta brand through the end of the summer season.

It should be noted that the contract requires TAA to add the correct prorated contract amount for the initial payment due July 7, 2026. All other terms, conditions, scope of services, confidentiality provisions, insurance requirements, and cancellation rights set forth in the original agreement remain in full force and effect.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total contract cost for the extension period (June 8 – August 31, 2026) is based on a monthly rate of $3,200.00, billed on a quarterly basis and totals $6,400.00 X Regular
Consent
Closed
Presentation
39 Visit Mount Shasta Marketing Contract
This Agreement is made and entered into on July 1st, 2026 between the Ascension Aesthetic hereinafter referred to as “TAA” and the City of Mt Shasta hereinafter referred to as “Client” A. TAA is engaged in the business of providing services of online marketing, social media management, video production, photography, web development, web consulting, domain services, search engine optimization, pay per click campaigns, e-commerce, online reputation management, mobile development, web maintenance services, and other web related activities.

B. The Client desires to procure the services of TAA for digital marketing for the brand Visit Mount Shasta.

C. Pursuant to discussions and in consideration of the undertakings, obligations and covenants of the Client, TAA and/or its affiliates have agreed to provide services to the Client, on the terms and conditions specified herein below.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Service Description
FaceBook/Instagram
Management
5 posts per month, 30 stories per month, Data Analysis, Profile Optimization, Industry Research, Hashtag Research, Customer Relationship Management.

Website Management Light Website Overhaul, Maintenance, SEO, Additional Content Generation, Data Analysis.

YouTube Management Organization of YouTube channel, importing present videos.

Facebook/Instagram/Google Ad
Marketing
Campaign Creation, Pixel Creation, Audience Creation, Keyword Research, Creative & Copy, Data Analysis, Conversion Tracking, Retargeting Strategy, $750 per month in ad spend.

Quarterly Analytics Reach, impressions, follower count, ad performance, and audience demographics for social media. Visitors, bounce rate, and audience demographics for website.
40 CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES
Client will need to provide
- Company Logo(s) and other marketing materials when requested. - Timely communication and responses when working with TAA staff to avoid delays in executions.

Client must be timely and proactive in the actionable strategies or tactics needing to be implemented as agreed upon by both parties.

CESSATION
The Client may at any time during the term of this Agreement relieve TAA of its services if the latter is found to be operating unethically, maliciously, with fraud, or with dishonor to the Client.

TAA may at any time during the term of this Agreement relieve the Client of its services if the Client is found to be operating unethically or maliciously towards TAA.

CONFIDENTIALITY
Any sensitive figures, data, sales projections, budget amounts, sales reports, et al relating to the brand Visit Mount Shasta, obtained by TAA will remain confidential and will not be shared with anyone outside the company. Each Party agrees that it will not disclose to any third party or use any Confidential Information of the other Party, except as expressly permitted in this Agreement, and that it shall take all reasonable measures to maintain the confidentiality of all such Confidential Information in its possession or control, which shall in no event be less than the measures it uses to maintain the confidentiality of its own information of similar importance.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the obligation of confidentiality shall not apply to any disclosure (i) of information that is in or enters the public domain other than by reason of a breach by the Person receiving such information, (ii) of information that was in the possession of the receiving Person prior to its disclosure to such Person, or (iii) required by law, regulation, legal process, or order of any court or governmental body having jurisdiction provided, however, that prior to such disclosure, the Party who is required to disclose the information shall inform the other Party and consult with that Party as to the information which will be disclosed and, provided, further, that the information so disclosed shall be limited to that legally required to be disclosed pursuant to such law, regulation, legal process, or order of any court or regulatory/government authority.
41 CONTRACT TERMS
The period of the contract is for 1 Quarter (prorated) from July 1st, 2026 to August 31st, 2026.

The Client agrees that the subscription for services mentioned in the above Scope of Service is a monthly recurring charge billed quarterly during the term of the Agreement.

RIGHT TO CANCEL
If, from the commencement of the Agreement, the Client is not satisfied with the services provided by TAA, it may immediately cancel this Agreement by giving a one-month notice to TAA in writing via email. Failure to follow the cancellation policy mentioned in this Clause will result in continued billing.

The Parties further agree that in the event his Agreement is canceled/terminated for any reason, the CLIENT shall not be liable to pay the Fees from the effective date of termination of this Agreement.

PAYMENT
It has been agreed that the Client shall pay the amount of $3,200 per month on a quarterly basis. Dates of payment shall be:
-August 31st, 2026 for the prorated amount of $6400
It has been agreed by the Parties hereto that in the event of any delay on the part of the CLIENT to pay the Fees within 15 days from the due date, would constitute a Material Breach of the Agreement by the Client, and TAA shall have the right to stop execution of any and all services to the Client after the expiration of such period, until all outstanding dues have been cleared.

ANALYTICS & REPORTING
TAA agrees to provide the Client with quarterly reports showing the analytics from the Visit Mount Shasta Instagram, Facebook, Website, and ad campaign performance. The reports shall be issued on September 15th, 2026

ENTIRE AGREEMENT
The Client acknowledges that these Terms with the included Privacy Statement constitute the entire Agreement between the Client and TAA.
42 COPYRIGHT
TAA agrees not to use any copyrighted material from sources not provided by the Client in marketing and advertising efforts which can lead to legal complications for the client. The Client agrees not to provide any creative pictures or content which can cause any legal complications to TAA.

All Content created/generated by TAA will remain the property of TAA, licensed to the Client unless otherwise agreed upon by both Parties and stated in writing.

INSURANCE
TAA agrees to carry two million general liability insurance naming the Client as additionally insured. In addition, TAA will carry worker’s compensation insurance for any employee.
43 The City of Mt Shasta
City Manager Date
The Ascension Aesthetic
06/08/2026
Date
44 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #12
MEETING DATE: June 08, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approval for Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Kimley-Horn for the Reconstruction of Lake Street Complete Streets Project
RECOMMENDATION: Staff respectfully requests that the City Council approve Amendment #1 to the professional services agreement with Kimley-Horn for the Reconstruction of Lake Street Complete Streets Project.

BACKGROUND: In January 2026, the City contracted with Kimley-Horn to complete a design and construction package for the reconstruction of Lake Street from Mt. Shasta Blvd. to Rockfellow Drive, utilizing the Lake Street For All Complete Streets Plan recently completed by Green Dot Transportation Solutions.

As part of the complete streets approach, the water and sewer infrastructure was assessed and identified for upgrade. However, the preliminary construction cost estimate made clear that the $2.2 million in grant construction funding is insufficient to complete the entire length of East Lake Street, making it necessary to phase the project. Phase 1 will expend the $2.2 million and extend from Mt. Shasta Blvd. to just short of Alder Street. Phase 2 will begin where Phase 1 ends and extend to Rockfellow Drive.

The revised scope of work in Amendment #1 increases the total contract cost by $46,780.74, due to the following additional work items:
• Creation of two separate plan sets for Phase 1 and Phase 2 • Design of sewer and water improvements integrated into the complete streets package • Traffic Operations Analysis at the intersection of Lake Street and Mt. Shasta Blvd., necessitated by the addition of bike lanes, sidewalk bulb-outs, and the resulting reduction in lane width
The cost of Amendment #1 will be covered with gas tax funds.

X Regular Session
Special Session
Emergency
Session
Closed Session
45 Amendment No. 1
Revised and Restated Scope of Services
Task 1: Project Management
Upon receipt of the Notice to Proceed, Kimley-Horn will coordinate and attend one virtual project kick-off meeting. The primary purpose of this coordination meeting will be to define key challenges, establish communication channels, review the scope of services and grant requirements, confirm stakeholders, identify project development team (PDT) members, and establish a mutually acceptable project schedule.

This task also includes providing general project administration, including management of project staff, quality control, and project accounting. Kimley-Horn will attend monthly PDT meetings (assumed to be virtual via Microsoft Teams or Zoom) to discuss the project, present design concerns, identify resolutions, schedule updates, and cost considerations. For this Scope of Services, we assume the following:
 Phase 1 Improvements (Mt. Shasta Blvd to 150’ East of Chestnut St) – A 6-month project duration (notice to proceed to public advertising) for a total of six (6) virtual meetings.  Phase 2 Improvements (150’ East of Chestnut St to Rockfellow Dr) – A 4-month project duration.  The Bidding Assistance and Design Services During Construction tasks have a combined 12-month duration. No scheduled meetings are included in these tasks, however, each respective task budget may include project meetings as-needed at the request of the City up to the budgeted amount for this task.
 Stakeholder meetings beyond those of the monthly PDT meetings with City staff are included in Task 3: Public Outreach/Stakeholder Coordination discussed elsewhere in this Scope of Services.

Kimley-Horn will prepare agendas and track action items for each meeting. Upon completion of the project, Kimley-Horn will submit to the City pertinent design records, reports, record drawings, and other documents as requested by the City when not specifically a deliverable under other tasks listed in this Scope of Services.

Deliverables:
 Project schedule and updates
 Meeting agendas, minutes, and action items for all design and coordination meetings Task 2: Geotechnical Engineering
Kimley-Horn, utilizing its geotechnical engineering partner Shannon & Wilson (S&W), will provide the following geotechnical engineering services:

Project Management: S&W will attend PDT meetings when invited by Kimley-Horn, coordinate with the project team, and prepare monthly invoices, track budgets and project completion, and manage design team deliverables, including coordination with Kimley-Horn’s design team for project progression.

Reconnaissance and Advance Preparations: S&W will acquire/review readily available historical roadway as-built documents and other relevant project documentation, perform an initial site visit with the project team to review site access and site safety, observe overall general conditions for field investigation planning. S&W will photograph and document general site conditions and paint/stake boring locations and perform a pavement condition survey. S&W will prepare an encroachment permit application with the City of Mount Shasta and will prepare traffic control plans with a subconsultant and submit to the City for 46 approval. Traffic control will follow the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) - temporary traffic control plans.

Subsurface Explorations: S&W will perform the following:
 Mobilize pavement coring rig, Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) testing equipment, and power auger equipment to perform the subsurface field investigation work along the roadway.  Core six (6) pavement locations using a 6-inch thin wall core barrel to recover pavement cores for visual inspection and measurement. Perform Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) testing in general accordance with ASTM D6951 to a depth of about 36 inches below pavement base in the underlying subgrade soils. The locations will be at approximately 500 feet on center in alternating lanes.  Obtain bulk soil samples of the material in the upper 3 feet with a power auger drill at each location.  Boreholes will be backfilled to a depth about 6-inches below ground surface with aggregate. The surface will be patched with Rapid Set concrete, dyed black where the existing asphalt concrete was penetrated.

Laboratory Testing: S&W will unload samples, complete custody log-in, and store, and review samples and prepare/coordinate testing instructions. S&W will review test reports. At project closure, S&W will dispose of samples at a public landfill.

Data Development and Analyses: S&W will prepare boring and vicinity maps as well as pavement section recommendations.

Reporting: S&W will prepare the Draft Geotechnical Design Report which is anticipated to include calculation summaries and the supporting data appendices. The report will be drafted and include appropriate special provisions and notes to the contractor that are to be included in the construction documents. Upon one round of comments, the final report will be prepared.

Deliverables:
 Draft and final geotechnical report
Task 3: Public Outreach/Stakeholder Coordination
Kimley-Horn will support the City with preparation of public outreach and educational materials for public outreach associated with Phase 2 improvements located on Lake St between 150’ East of Chestnut St and Rockfellow Dr. Kimley-Horn will prepare an informational flyer for distribution by City staff. Kimley-Horn will translate the flyer into Spanish. Kimley-Horn will assist with stakeholder coordination and facilitate design review meetings to receive input on design elements.

We assume that up to two (2) team members from Kimley-Horn will attend in-person at up to one (1) public workshop and/or stakeholder coordination meeting related to the Project. We also assume up to three (3) virtual meetings for stakeholder coordination. We assume the public outreach workshop will occur after 30% conceptual design for Phase 2 improvements.

We assume no public outreach services are included in this Scope of Services for Phase 1 improvements (Mt. Shasta Blvd to 150’ East of Chestnut St) as we assume the City will provide outreach services for this phase of work.

Our Scope of Services includes up to 60 hours for stakeholder coordination and development of one flyer. 47 Deliverables:
 Up to one graphic and/or flyer for City distribution (English and Spanish)  Attendance for up to two (2) team members at up to one (1) in-person outreach/stakeholder coordination meeting
 Attendance at up to three (3) virtual meetings
Task 4: Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E)
Task 4.1: Site Visit
We assume the City will provide existing records prior to the project kick-off meeting, and Kimley-Horn will review existing records, maps, and data including project records, as-built drawings, studies, reports, maps, and any other documents relevant to the limits and scope of this project. Kimley-Horn will perform two (2) site visits with up to two (2) staff and will provide a one-time photographic record or video recording of the existing site conditions.

Task 4.2: Phase 1 (Mt. Shasta Blvd to 150’ East of Chestnut St) Design Task 4.2.1 – 30% Plan
Based on information received in the City-furnished topographic survey, Kimley-Horn will prepare 30% level design documents, inclusive of a roll plot conceptual plan and opinion of probable construction cost (OPCC) for City review and comment. The roll plot will depict preliminary layouts of civil improvements, potential drainage upgrades, and signing and striping. The existing right-of-way, easements, and other pertinent elements will be shown on the roll plot, if included in the City-furnished topographic survey.

Task 4.2.2 – 65% Plans and Estimate
Following receipt of one set of consolidated, non-conflicting City redlines on the 30% plan, Kimley-Horn will advance the design to the 65% level, inclusive of plans and OPCC for review and comment. We assume this submittal will include the following sheets:
 Cover Sheet – 1 sheet
 General Notes/Abbreviations/Legend – 1 sheet
 Typical Sections – 1 sheet
 Horizontal/Vertical Control – 1 sheet
 Demolition Sheets – 1 sheet
 Layout Plan – 1 sheet
 Construction Details – 1 sheet
 Utility Plans (Water/Sanitary Sewer/Drainage) – 1 sheet  Profiles (Water/Sanitary Sewer/Drainage) – 1 sheet
 Traffic Signal Modification – 2 sheets
 Signing and Striping Plans – 1 sheet
Total Sheet Count – 12

Kimley-Horn will include a preliminary hydrology and hydraulics memorandum with this submittal package.

Task 4.2.3 – Draft 100% PS&E
Based upon one set of consolidated, non-conflicting City redlines from the 65% submittal, Kimley-Horn will prepare and submit Draft 100% design documents, inclusive of plans, specifications, and cost estimate for City review and comment. Kimley-Horn will prepare a response-to-comments matrix for City comments 48 stemming from the 65% review. We will prepare project technical specifications following Caltrans 2025 format, or the latest version available at the time of production.

Kimley-Horn will include a final hydrology and hydraulics memorandum with this submittal package.

Task 4.2.4 – Final 100% PS&E
Based upon one set of consolidated, non-conflicting City redlines comments from their review of the Draft 100% design documents, Kimley-Horn will prepare and submit Final 100% design documents, inclusive of plans, specifications, and cost estimate signed by the engineer in responsible charge ready for public advertisement. Kimley-Horn will prepare a response-to-comments matrix for City comments. Additional revisions to the Final 100% PS&E package will be considered additional scope and can be performed for an additional fee.

Task 4.3: Phase 2 (150’ East of Chestnut St to Rockfellow Dr) Design Task 4.3.1 – 30% Plan
Based on information received in the City-furnished topographic survey, Kimley-Horn will prepare 30% level design documents, inclusive of a roll plot conceptual plan and opinion of probable construction cost (OPCC) for City review and comment as well as public outreach. The roll plot will depict preliminary layouts of civil improvements, potential drainage upgrades, and signing and striping. The existing right-of-way, easements, and other pertinent elements will be shown on the roll plot, if included in the City-furnished topographic survey.

Task 4.3.2 – 65% Plans and Estimate
Following receipt of one set of consolidated, non-conflicting City redlines on the 30% plan, Kimley-Horn will advance the design to the 65% level, inclusive of plans and OPCC for review and comment. We assume this submittal will include the following sheets:
 Cover Sheet – 1 sheet
 General Notes/Abbreviations/Legend – 1 sheet
 Typical Sections – 1 sheet
 Horizontal/Vertical Control – 1 sheet
 Demolition Sheets – 4 sheets
 Layout Plan – 4 sheets
 Construction Details – 2 sheets
 Utility Plans (Water/Sanitary Sewer/Drainage) – 4 sheets  Profiles (Water/Sanitary Sewer/Drainage) – 3 sheets
 Electrical Sheets (RRFB Details) – 2 sheets
 Signing and Striping Plans – 3 sheets
Total Sheet Count – 26

Kimley-Horn will include a preliminary hydrology and hydraulics memorandum with this submittal package.

Task 4.3.3 – Draft 100% PS&E
Based upon one set of consolidated, non-conflicting City redlines from the 65% submittal, Kimley-Horn will prepare and submit Draft 100% design documents, inclusive of plans, specifications, and cost estimate for City review and comment. Kimley-Horn will prepare a response-to-comments matrix for City comments stemming from the 65% review. We will prepare project technical specifications following Caltrans 2025 format, or the latest version available at the time of production. 49 Kimley-Horn will include a final hydrology and hydraulics memorandum with this submittal package.

Task 4.3.4 – Final 100% PS&E
Based upon one set of consolidated, non-conflicting City redlines comments from their review of the Draft 100% design documents, Kimley-Horn will prepare and submit Final 100% design documents, inclusive of plans, specifications, and cost estimate signed by the engineer in responsible charge ready for public advertisement. Kimley-Horn will prepare a response-to-comments matrix for City comments. Additional revisions to the Final 100% PS&E package will be considered additional scope and can be performed for an additional fee.

Task 4.4: Traffic Operations Analysis
Task 4.8.1 – Data Collection
Kimley-Horn will collect two (2) peak period turning movement counts at the project intersection of East Lake Street and North Mount Shasta Boulevard. These counts are anticipated to be conducted between 7:00-9:00 AM and 3:00-6:00 PM on a Friday when area schools are in session.

Task 4.8.2 – Traffic Operations Analysis
Kimley-Horn will consider up to one (1) peak-hour volume condition at the project intersection of East Lake Street and North Mount Shasta Boulevard. Traffic operations will be evaluated for the following three (3) alternatives:
• All-way stop-control
• Traffic signal control with phasing alternative 1
• Traffic signal control with phasing alternative 2
For each traffic scenario, stop and signal control analyses will be conducted with Synchro® using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies. We will complete the following as part of this task:
• Identify the lane configurations (number of turn and through lanes), geometrics (length of turn bays, taper/transition length, etc.), and lane storage length requirements. Pedestrian and bicycle volumes (if known) will be included in the analysis. Perform peak-hour intersection Level of Service (LOS) and queueing analysis for signal control for existing traffic conditions. Report the peak hour average control delay, LOS, and 95th percentile queue length for each approach by movement.

Queue estimates will be examined relative to existing storage lengths and left turn storage requirements.

Kimley-Horn will document the results of data collection and traffic operations analysis in subtasks 4.8.1 and 4.8.2 in technical memorandum format with graphics as deemed appropriate by Kimley-Horn. KimleyHorn will prepare and submit an electronic (PDF) copy of the memorandum to the City. We will address one (1) set of consolidated, non-conflicting City comments on the draft memorandum. If the comments require additional analysis or data collection beyond that provided in this Scope of Services, this work will be considered as an additional service. Any additional comment response, regardless of origin, will also be considered as an additional service. We will prepare and submit an election (PDF) version of the final memorandum to the City.
50 Assumptions:
 The project will be delivered in two phases with Phase 1 entering construction first, and which is fully funded, followed by Phase 2, once construction funding is secured. As such, we assume preparation of two separate sets of construction plans is required.  The City will furnish the topographic survey to Kimley-Horn, along with any required supplemental topographic survey should such become necessary to complete the design of the project.  The City has completed all environmental documents to comply with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and will furnish to Kimley-Horn the approved CEQA document, understood to be a Negative Declaration.
 The project will not require obtaining any permits from environmental regulatory agencies.  The project will occur completely within the public right-of-way, on City-owned property, or within City-owned easements. No right-of-way services to obtain easements or acquisition of real property is included in this Scope of Services.
 A biddability and constructability review is not included in this Scope of Services.  All deliverables will be provided in electronic format (PDF).  Storm drainage system assumptions include the following:
o For the purposes of this Scope of Services, storm drain infrastructure outside of the existing paved roadway of Lake Street is considered “offsite.” We assume no offsite upstream or downstream storm drain improvements; existing upstream and downstream offsite storm drain are assumed adequate or will be improved as part of a separate City project. o Hydrology: Rational Method within an approximate 30 acre local watershed. Design storm analysis shall match the current Mt Shasta Stormwater Improvement project (10yr, 20yr, 100yr) lead by Progression Engineering.
o Hydraulics: Hydraflow Storm Sewers utilizing Manning’s equation. Hydraulic design shall match the current Mt Shasta Stormwater Improvement project (approximately 10 yr capacity) lead by Progression Engineering.
o We assume the existing storm drain main within the project limits shall remain in place.

Proposed storm drain design will be limited to up to six (6) curb catch basins and storm drain laterals connecting to the existing storm drain mains, with 6”-8” high curbs, even if the Hydrology and Hydraulics analysis shows deficiencies. The Kimley-Horn team and City assume the project is intended to be a roadway reconstruction project and not a storm drain upgrade project.
o The project is exempt (i.e., non regulated project) from post construction stormwater treatment (e.g., bioretention, pervious pavements, treatment of 85th percentile, hydromodification) for Phase 2 permittees: pavement grinding and resurfacing of existing roadways and parking lots; construction of new sidewalks, pedestrian ramps, or bike lanes on existing roadways; or routine replacement of damaged pavement such as pothole repair or replacement of short, non-contiguous sections of roadway.

Deliverables:
 Pre-design photos and/or video
 30% Plans
 65% Plans and Estimate
 Draft 100% PS&E
 Final, signed 100% PS&E ready for public advertisement  Response to comments matrix
 Draft and final hydrology and hydraulics memorandum for new drainage work  Draft and final traffic operations analysis
51 Task 5: Utility Coordination – Phases 1 and 2
The Kimley-Horn team will coordinate with pertinent utility owners to clear the project for construction.

Utility coordination will include:

Task 5.1: Facility Mapping
Kimley-Horn will request from known utility owners mapping of overhead and underground utilities (i.e., ‘A’ Letter). Utility-furnished mapping will be shown in the project plans. Utility design is not included in this Scope of Services but could be provided for additional scope and fee. ‘A’ Letters will be submitted to the following utility owners as listed by USA North 811: AT&T, Hunter Communications, Inc., Northland Cable TV, and Pacific Power and Light Company. Kimley-Horn assumes the City will provide facility maps for Cityowned water, sanitary sewer, and storm drain infrastructure within the project area.

Task 5.2: Utility Conflict Resolution
Upon completion of the 65% PS&E submittal, Kimley-Horn will coordinate with impacted utility owners by submitting written notification (i.e., ‘B’ Letters). We will submit a conflict map and request a claim letter with determination of liability for who is financially responsible for the utility work.

Kimley-Horn will provide communication with utility owners to seek resolution to impacted facilities with a relocation plan by their respective owner. Once the City and utility owners agree upon liability, Kimley-Horn will issue the final utility notifications (i.e., ‘C’ Letters) in the form of the Notice to Owner. Each utility company shall then be responsible for relocating their facilities to meet the project schedule.

We assume that all utility communication will be electronic, and as such, no in-person meetings are included in this Scope of Services for on-site utility coordination meetings.

Our Scope of Services includes up to 25 hours to complete utility conflict resolution. Time required to complete utility conflict resolution beyond the time identified in this paragraph can be provided for additional scope and fee.

Assumptions:
 City forces will field-locate and mark with paint existing potable water and sanitary sewer mains.

The City will coordinate with their independently contracted land surveyor to survey the painted utility markings and incorporate them into the updated topographic survey.  Utility locating, designating, potholing, and design of private utilities is not included in this Scope of Services.

Deliverables:
 Utility coordination consisting of ‘A,’ ‘B,’ and ‘C’ Letters

Task 6: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) – Phases 1 and 2 Kimley-Horn will designate a staff member as the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) for the project. The QSD will lead and review the preparation of one Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) report for the proposed project as required by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Construction General Permit (CGP) Order 2022-0057-DWQ (with amendments), effective date September 1, 2023. The SWPPP will be based on the City-furnished topographic survey and consultant-provided project grading plan, included within the approved improvement plans, to address the following objectives:
52 1. Address pollutants and their source including sources of sediment associated with construction, construction site erosion, and other activities associated with construction activity

2. Identify Best Management Practices (BMPs) relevant to the project

3. Provide Erosion Control Plans to show BMP locations
Kimley-Horn will upload the required documents to the State Water Boards Storm Water Multi-Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS) for the Notice of Intent (NOI). This includes the following Permit Registration Documents (PRDs): the SWPPP document, Erosion Control Plans, and post-construction compliance documents.

Kimley Horn will assist in filing the NOI, submitting the Project Required Documents (PRDs), and creating the governing construction SWPPP files. We assume that the City will supply all the necessary construction documents, including scaled drawings, Title Report (if applicable), and other site information necessary to successfully create and submit the PRDs to the satisfaction of the reviewing agency.

The City is obligated to certify the necessary paperwork (NOI, Notice of Termination, etc.) with the SWRCB or other jurisdictions to comply with any applicable laws. Kimley-Horn is not responsible for implementation of the SWPPP, BMP selections made in the field, stormwater sampling, or fees related to permitting. The effort for this task also assumes the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) will not require any additional storm water pollution prevention measures or processes beyond those required by the CGP.

The Legally Responsible Person (LRP), or the City as the LRP designated representative, will be required to sign the appropriate applications, waivers, and agreements that are part of the LRP and SWPPP document process. Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) services, required inspections, annual reports, and filing of the Notice of Termination (NOT) are not included in this Scope of Services as they are typically provided by the City’s construction contractor.

Kimley-Horn assumes the following related to the SWPPP:
 The contractor will hire their own QSD and a change of QSD will take place prior to construction.

No site inspections are included as part of this Scope of Services.  The project will be a Risk Level 1 or 2.
 NOI fees will be paid by the City.
 No dewatering activities will be anticipated.
 It is not anticipated that SWPPP document amendments will be required.

Our Scope of Services includes up to 25 hours to complete SWPPP documents.

Assumptions:
 Kimley-Horn will prepare only one SWPPP covering both Phases 1 and 2 of the project. Should a separate SWPPP document be required for each phase, Kimley-Horn can provide such for additional scope and fee.

Deliverables:
 Stormwater pollution prevention plan
53 Task 7: Bidding Assistance – Phases 1 and 2
Kimley-Horn will provide support to the City during the bidding phase by reviewing and responding to bidders’ questions and requests for information (RFIs), providing addenda to the construction documents, as needed, and reviewing bids for responsiveness and reasonableness subject to the allocated budget for this task. Our Scope of Services includes up to 30 hours for bidding assistance.

Deliverables:
 Attendance at pre-bid meeting
 Attendance at bid opening meeting (if needed)
 Responses to RFIs and preparation of addenda (if needed)  Review bids for responsiveness and reasonableness
Task 8: Design Services During Construction
Not included in this Scope of Services.
54 197.39% Overhead%
Hunter
Young
196.29% Overhead% w/o FCCM Category/Title Project
Manager
14% Fee% Direct Rate $79.34 $116.52 $102.89 $88.11 $75.98 $62.88 $54.23 $47.49 $37.05 Billing Rate $268.86 $394.85 $348.66 $298.58 $257.47 $213.08 $183.77 $160.93 $125.55 Task 1 62 4 30 5 0 0 0 35 5 141 $ 36,461.83

1.1 20 2 35 5 62 $ 12,427.20

1.2 30 5 35 $ 9,558.69

1.3 12 12 $ 3,226.32

1.4 QA/QC at Plan Submittals 2 30 32 $ 11,249.62
Task 2 8 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 5 17 $ 3,797.82

2.1 8 2 2 5 17 $ 3,797.82
Task 3 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 10 60 $ 15,441.49

3.1 10 10 10 30 $ 6,929.90

3.2 15 15 30 $ 8,511.58
Task 4 138 1 3 40 30 134 630 220 2 1,198 $ 238,194.28

4.1 20 10 30 $ 8,362.99

4.2 $ 97,040.48

4.2.1 10 5 10 40 65 $ 13,663.09

4.2.2 20 10 55 60 145 $ 27,271.12

4.2.2 1 10 40 51 $ 10,605.43

4.2.2 2 8 25 35 $ 6,836.61

4.2.3 20 10 60 90 $ 18,534.19

4.2.3 1 5 30 36 $ 7,274.84

4.2.3 1 10 15 26 $ 5,156.22

4.2.4 5 5 20 30 $ 6,085.10

4.2.4 1 2 5 8 $ 1,613.87

4.3 $ 124,169.30

4.3.1 8 5 15 70 50 2 150 $ 28,001.45

4.3.2 15 10 20 100 40 185 $ 35,683.41

4.3.3 20 3 5 12 20 120 50 230 $ 45,366.23

4.3.4 10 8 12 25 20 75 $ 15,118.20

4.4 4 1 12 25 42 $ 8,621.51
Task 5 13 0 0 0 0 0 30 10 0 53 $ 10,617.56

5.1 3 10 13 $ 2,415.88

5.2 10 30 40 $ 8,201.69
Task 6 5 0 0 0 13 0 30 0 0 48 $ 10,204.55

6.1 5 13 30 48 $ 10,204.55
Task 7 5 0 0 0 0 10 10 5 0 30 $ 6,117.46

7.1 5 10 10 5 30 $ 6,117.46
256 5 35 70 43 144 700 272 22 1,547
$68,828.14 $1,974.26 $12,203.24 $20,900.52 $11,071.38 $30,683.78 $128,638.67 $43,772.86 $2,762.13 $ 320,834.99 $ 75,270.59
$ 13,675.59
$ 2,000.00
$ 500.00
$ 42,095.00
$ 15,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 396,105.58

TOTAL HOURS
Subtotal Labor:

Other Direct Costs
Escalation
Travel/Mileage
Bidding Assistance
Bid Support During Advertisement
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
SWPPP Development
Utility Coordination
Facility Mapping (A Letters)
Utility Conflict Resolution (B & C Letters)
Site Visit
30% Plan
65% Plans and Estimate - Roadway
Draft 100% PS&E - Roadway
Traffic Operations Analysis
Final 100% PS&E - Roadway
65% Plans and Estimate - Water/Sewer
30% Plan
65% Plans and Estimate - Traffic Signal
Draft 100% PS&E - Water/Sewer
Draft 100% PS&E - Traffic Signal
Final 100% PS&E - Traffic Signal
Phase 1 Design (Mt Shasta Blvd to East of Chestnut St)
Phase 2 Design (East of Chestnut St to Rockfellow Dr)
65% Plans and Estimate
Draft 100% PS&E
Final 100% PS&E
Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
Professional II Professional I Sr.

Professional I
Project Schedule (Quarterly)
Geotechnical Report (Draft / Final)
Public Outreach / Stakeholder Coordination
Stakeholder Coordination - In-Person
Geotechnical Engineering
Stakeholder Coordination - Virtual
NDS (Traffic Counts)
Outside Printing/Courier Services
Shannon and Wilson (Geotech)
Progression Engineering (Drainage)

CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA
Lake Street Complete Streets Project
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Project
Support
TOTAL

HOURS TOTAL COST
Analyst II Analyst I
Project Management and Coordination
Project Administration
TOTAL COST:

Sr.

Professional II
Sr.

Professional III
Project Meetings - Virtual
55 196.29% Overhead% w/o FCCM Category/Title
Billing Rate
Task 1 $ 44,824.82 $ (8,362.99) $ 36,461.83

1.1 $ 12,427.20 $ - $ 12,427.20

1.2 $ 8,362.99 $ (8,362.99) $ -

1.3 $ 9,558.69 $ - $ 9,558.69

1.4 $ 3,226.32 $ - $ 3,226.32

1.5 QA/QC at Plan Submittals $ 11,249.62 $ - $ 11,249.62 Task 2 $ 3,797.82 $ - $ 3,797.82

2.1 $ 3,797.82 $ - $ 3,797.82
Task 3 $ 15,441.48 $ - $ 15,441.48

3.1 $ 6,929.90 $ - $ 6,929.90

3.2 $ 8,511.58 $ - $ 8,511.58
Task 4 $ 150,224.93 $ 87,969.35 $ 238,194.28

4.1 $ 10,200.68 $ (1,837.69) $ 8,362.99

4.2 $ 21,025.57 $ 20,638.98 $ 41,664.55

4.3 $ 39,099.74 $ 41,296.84 $ 80,396.58

4.4 90% PS&E (Phases 1 and 2) $ 35,609.98 $ (35,609.98) $ -

4.5 Constructability Review $ - $ - $ -

4.6 $ 29,264.15 $ 47,067.33 $ 76,331.48

4.7 $ 15,024.81 $ 7,792.36 $ 22,817.17

4.8 $ - $ 8,621.51 $ 8,621.51
Task 5 $ 12,642.63 $ (2,025.06) $ 10,617.57

5.1 $ 2,415.88 $ - $ 2,415.88

5.2 $ 2,025.06 $ (2,025.06) $ -

5.3 $ - $ - $ -

5.4 $ 8,201.69 $ - $ 8,201.69
Task 6 $ 10,204.55 $ - $ 10,204.55

6.1 $ 10,204.55 $ - $ 10,204.55
Task 7 $ 6,117.46 $ - $ 6,117.46

7.1 $ 6,117.46 $ - $ 6,117.46
Task 8 $ - $ - $ -

8.1 $ - $ - $ -
$ 243,253.69 $ 77,581.30 $ 320,834.99
$ 106,071.15 $ (30,800.56) $ 75,270.59
$ 7,936.15 $ 5,739.44 $ 13,675.59
$ 2,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00
$ 500.00 $ - $ 500.00
$ 34,025.00 $ 8,070.00 $ 42,095.00
$ 29,960.00 $ (14,960.00) $ 15,000.00
$ 29,650.00 $ (29,650.00) $ -
$ - $ - $ -
$ 2,000.00 $ - $ 2,000.00
$ 349,324.84 $ 46,780.74 $ 396,105.58
Summary of Budget Changes Dated 5/22/26

CITY OF MOUNT SHASTA
Lake Street Complete Streets Project (Phases 1 and 2)
Utility Potholing (OPTIONAL TASK)
30% Plans (Phases 1 and 2)
65% Plans and Estimate (Phases 1 and 2)
Draft 100% PS&E
Final 100% PS&E

ORIGINAL

CONTRACT

AMENDMENT
NO. 1

REVISED

CONTRACT
VALUE
Traffic Operations Analysis
Bidding Assistance
Bid Support During Advertisement
Utility Conflict Resolution (B & C Letters)
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
SWPPP Development
Utility Coordination
Facility Mapping (A Letters)
Utility Designating
Site Visit

TOTAL HOURS
Subtotal Labor:

Other Direct Costs
Escalation
Travel/Mileage
Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
Project Schedule (Quarterly)
Geotechnical Report (Draft / Final)
Public Outreach / Stakeholder Coordination
Stakeholder Coordination - In-Person
Geotechnical Engineering
Stakeholder Coordination - Virtual
Project Meetings - In-Person
Design Services During Construction (Not Included in Scope) T2 Utility Engineers (Utility Potholing - OPTIONAL TASK) T2 Utility Engineers (Utility Designating)
NDS (Traffic Counts)
Outside Printing/Courier Services
Shannon and Wilson (Geotech)
Progression Engineering (Drainage)
TOTAL COST:

Project Management and Coordination
Project Administration
Design Services During Construction
Project Meetings - Virtual
56 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #13
MEETING DATE: June 08, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ken Kellogg, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Approval for Amendment to Professional Services Agreement with Progression Engineering
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff requests that the City Council approve an amendment to the professional services agreement with Progression Engineering to add street improvements on South Washington Drive, including pavement, sidewalk, curb, gutter, and associated structures.

BACKGROUND:

In June 2025, the City contracted with Progression Engineering for planning, modeling, and design of stormwater system improvements for the McCloud Avenue, Cold Creek, and Washington Drive – Mt. Shasta Blvd. storm drainages.

During drainage system design for South Washington Drive, assumptions were made regarding street width, slope, curb height, and drop inlet placement. Designing the drainage and street improvements together will produce more accurate results and will strengthen future funding applications for both project components.

This amendment primarily adds street improvement design for South Washington Drive. It also repurposes funds from reduced-scope tasks and adds right-of-way work near West Water Street and the Union Pacific Railroad. The amendment cost is $191,801, bringing the total contract to $1,436,070 This total is still within the available grant not to exceed amount totaling $1,575,000.

X Regular Session
Special Session
Emergency
Session
Closed Session
57 ADDITIONAL SERVICE AUTHORIZATION #01 (ASA 01)
5/15/2026
Ken Kellogg, PE, Director of Public Works
City of Mount Shasta
305 N. Mt. Shasta Boulevard
Mt. Shasta, California 96067
[email protected]
RE: Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage Additional Service Authorization #01 (ASA 01)
Progression Engineering Project #2025060501
DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED:

Progression Engineering, a California Corporation ("Progression Engineering"), has entered into an agreement with the City of Mount Shasta (the "Client") dated 06/11/2025 (the "Prime Agreement") for the project: Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage (the "Project"). Additional Services Authorized by the Client are subject to the Terms and Conditions of the Prime Agreement.

Per the Project’s Tech Memo (dated March 2026), the City has selected Alternative A and the Project no longer includes open channel/open creek design and permitting downstream (west) of the UPRR crossing. Alternative A also removed the feasibility for detention. This ASA 01 repurposes portions of the Prime Agreement and adds new scope for Project.
58 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Other Direct Costs
City authorizes Project Team to repurpose remaining Other Direct Costs (ODCs) from the Prime Agreement as labor and/or ODCs to support and supplement the Tech Memo’s Alternative A, the road widening design for S Washington Dr surface drainage improvements, and Task 6.

Task 5: Creek Stabilization and Improvements
The City authorizes the Consultant to repurpose some Task 5 tasks for the Tech Memo’s Alternative A, the road widening design for S Washington Dr surface drainage improvements, and supplementing Task 6. For fees, refer to the Schedule of Fees on Pages 11-12 of this ASA 01.

Task

5.1 Creek Survey
 Status as of 4/30/26:
o Portions of Cold Creek surveyed in 2025
 Remaining creek work: additional supplemental creek and watershed survey.
 Fees – keep in Task 5 per Prime Agreement

5.2 Creek Geotechnical
 Status as of 4/30/26:
o Geotechnical borings at portions of Cold Creek in 2025  Remaining creek work: additional geotechnical borings for storm drain structures (diversion and outfall) and trenching
 Fees – keep in Task 5 per Prime Agreement
59 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

5.3 Creek Modeling, Flow Monitoring, Calibration
 Status as of 4/30/26:
o Stream gage for flow monitoring and calibration installed in 2025
 Remaining creek work: creek gage flow monitoring and applicable updates to flood model and design
 Fees – keep in Task 5 per Prime Agreement

5.4 Creek Permitting
 Status as of 4/30/26:
o Work starting in April/May 2026
 Remaining creek work: permitting for creek diversion and outfall structures
 Fees – keep in Task 5 per Prime Agreement

5.5 Creek Stabilization and Improvements 50% PS&E
 Status as of 4/30/26:
o no work to-date
 Remaining creek work: none
 Fees: Repurpose remaining fees to Task 6 for S Washington Dr

5.6 Creek Stabilization and Improvements 100% PS&E
 Status as of 4/30/26:
o no work to-date
 Remaining creek work: none
 Fees: Repurpose remaining fees to Task 6 for S Washington Dr

5.7 Creek Stabilization and Improvements Final PS&E
 Status as of 4/30/26:
o no work to-date
 Remaining creek work: none
 Fees: Repurpose remaining fees to Task 6 for S Washington Dr Task 6: Additional Services
The following tasks are added to tasks and scope of the Prime Agreement.

Subtask 6.1: Water St ROW and Easements
60 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Progression Engineering’s subconsultant, BKF Engineers, shall obtain ROW, easement, and title report information and mapping where Water St and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) meet:
 Water Street: UPRR, APN 057-271-050, and APN 057-263-020 per the following figure:

Figure 1 Water St Scope Markup
This task provides 2 field days and searching across the railroad tracks to established the SPRR ROW. Refer to Optional Task 6.10 (Record of Survey Water St) for Record of Survey in the event that maps need to corrected. The ROW and easement information, including conditions of any easements, shall be included in the project topographic survey and construction plans.

This task includes reimbursable expenses for title reports and related documents and services.

61 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Deliverables:
 ROW and Easement information and mapping for UPRR, APN 057-271-050, APN 057-263-020
 Title reports for UPRR, APN 057-271-050, APN 057-263-020 Subtask 6.2: 50% PS&E S Washington Dr Surface Improvements City intends to widen the existing City ROW and road corridor (including travel lanes, bike lanes, curb, gutter, sidewalk, retaining walls, grading conforms) to 60’ along S Washington Dr (between McCloud Ave and Old McCloud Rd) to improve surface drainage – approximately 2,600 LF.

The Project Team shall design curb, gutter, sidewalk, stormwater treatment, and bike path, based on the Task 1 modeling results, Task 3.1 existing utility locations, and City’s direction on preferred improvements.

The widening will be largely symmetrical about the existing centerline to the ultimate right of way of 60-feet wide, but it may include additional adjustments to limit impacts to adjoining properties and improvements. Grade conforms transverse to the centerline will primarily be made using an assumed 2H:1V (maximum) for flatter slopes. In select locations, retaining walls will be used to provide quicker grade conforms where 2H:1V maximum conforms are not feasible.

Twenty (20) potential wall locations have been identified along the corridor. Five (5) locations appear most likely to remain as retaining wall systems. An additional six (6) locations have a low potential for wall systems due to direct conflicts exiting improvements. The remaining nine (9) locations appear to be best suited for graded slope conform (2H:1V maximum).

Expected plan sheets:
 Demolition (2 sheets at 20 scale)
 Erosion Control Plans (2 sheets at 20 scale)
 Road Plan and Profile (4 sheets at 20 scale)
 Cross Sections (5 sheets at 10 scale)
 Utility Lateral Relocations (up to 29 sewer laterals and 29 water laterals)  Signing and Striping (2 sheets at 20 scale)
62 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

 ADA Curb Ramp Details (4 sheets at 5 scale)
 Engineering Details (3 sheets, not to scale)
Where the proposed ROW conflicts with existing residential home structures, the Project Team shall recommend a proposed alignment to a sub-60’ proposed City ROW to accommodate the existing homes. This ASA scope includes 2 (maximum) iterations to the ROW design (1 at 50% design, 1 at 100% design). City is fully responsible for any ROW record of survey, establishment, negotiations, and acquisitions.

The existing longitudinal slopes of S Washington Dr and adjacent streets constrain ADA compliant-paths and curb ramps; ADA conforms to existing conditions (e.g., sidewalks, walkways, paths, planters, front yards, graded areas, streets, etc.) are limited to within 5’ (maximum) of each proposed curb ramp. Project includes 3 (maximum) crosswalks across S Washington Dr (assumed at Smith St, Ida St, and Old McCloud Rd) at proposed curb ramps. Project assumes 23 (maximum) standard curb ramps per Caltrans or City of Redding standard details.

Road Widening Design for surface drainage assumes:
 City wants to remove any existing trees and private encroachments  City is able to acquire the ROW and applicable approvals from private owners  relocate existing City-owned utility laterals
 replace existing driveways for widening
 Pacific Power responsible for relocation design of any existing PG&E utility poles as shown on Project Team’s plans
 Prepare wall layouts (location and heights) for five (5) retaining walls, comprised of five (5) wall locations. Wall types are assumed to be a Caltrans Standard Plan retaining walls. Wall design heights (H, top of footing to top of wall) are assumed to be less than or equal to 4 feet. Wall foundations are assumed to be spread footings (i.e., not pile supported foundations). o Wall layouts are for design layout and cost estimating purposes only and not for construction. Per 5/5/26 City direction to Consultant, wall design (including structural design and related geotechnical engineering) is a deferred submittal and excluded from this ASA. 63 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Stormwater design assumes:
 more than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface will be created or replaced and the project will be considered a regulated project as defined in the City of Redding’s Post-Construction Standards Plan, requiring RWQCB stormwater treatment and hydromodification management for Phase 2 permittees.
 stormwater treatment will use RWQCB’s Phase II LID Sizing Tool for a roadside swale or utilize “drain to vegetated surface” exemption for sidewalks and bike lanes.
 project will need to comply with hydromodification management objectives and demonstrate that post-project runoff does not exceed estimated preproject flow rate for the 2- year, 24-hour storm.

Project Team shall prepare draft Post-Construction Stormwater Treatment calculations for the project, draft Post-Construction Worksheets, and draft Hydrology Report.

Excluded from this project (can be added as additional scope and fee):
 ROW negotiations, acquisitions, valuations
 SWPPP
 traffic control detour plans
 relocation of existing utility mains
 engineering and environmental studies (arborist, traffic, etc.) not specifically listed in this scope
 electrical design
 lighting design
 landscape architecture design
 architectural and custom fencing design
 Community outreach specific to the road widening project  Retaining wall design, structural calculations, retaining wall alternatives analysis, wall construction footprints (for estimating temporary construction easements), and related geotechnical engineering (including investigations). 64 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Deliverables:
 50% PS&E surface improvements (PDF format)
 Draft Stormwater Treatment Calculations and Design for Phase II Permittees  Draft Post-Construction Worksheets
 Draft Hydrology Report
Subtask 6.3: 100% PS&E S Washington Dr Surface Improvements Based on the City’s comments and feedback on the 50% design, Project Team shall update the project to 100% design level.

A virtual comment review/resolution meeting will be held following receipt of the 100% City and CA Water Resources Control Board comments (if any).

Project Team shall prepare final Post-Construction Stormwater Treatment calculations, final Post-Construction Worksheets, and final Hydrology Report. It is assumed comments will be minor in nature and any wholesale design changes made between 50% and 100% not contemplated in the tasks above will be revised as part of an additional service authorization.

Deliverables:
 100% PS&E surface improvements (PDF format)
 Final Stormwater Treatment Calculations and Design for Phase II Permittees  Final Post-Construction Worksheets
 Final Hydrology Report
 Response to City’s 50% comments
Subtask 6.4: Final PS&E S Washington Dr Surface Improvements Based on the City’s comments and feedback on the 100% design, Project Team shall update the project to Final (bid ready).

A virtual page-turn meeting will be held with the City to go over the final deliverables.
65 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Deliverables:
 Response to City’s 100% comments
 Final PS&E surface improvements (PDF format)
Subtask 6.5: Geotechnical Borings for McCloud Ave and S Washington Dr The Project is now expanded, compared to the Prime Agreement, to include:
 an additional 2,500 ft storm drain culvert (6’x5’ culvert, approximately 10’ deep trench excavation) up McCloud Ave, east of S Washington Dr  approximately 2,600 ft long widening (road, curb, gutter, sidewalk, retaining walls, grading) of S Washington Drive between Old McCloud Rd on the south and McCloud Ave on the north. Project will include stormwater treatment requirements in the form of vegetated infiltration features such as bioswales, bioretention, and/or modular pavement support system (e.g., Silva Cells installed under sidewalks).
o This task does not include structural retaining wall recommendations for the S Washington Dr road widening.

Crawford and Associates shall obtain:
 1 additional boring in N Washington Dr (near Old McCloud Rd) to develop geotechnical parameters and recommendations (including groundwater levels, infiltration rates, stability) to support the proposed storm drain and stormwater treatment.
 2 additional borings for the extension of the SD system will be taken along McCloud Ave.

The borings will be drilled to a maximum depth of 20 ft or until auger refusal, whichever is shallower. Traffic control will consist of single lane closures and shoulder closures. Crawford will complete laboratory testing on the samples as appropriate including gradation, plasticity, unconfined compressive strength, corrosion, and density testing. Crawford and Associates shall incorporate the boring, laboratory, and geotechnical parameters into the Project Geotechnical Report (Task 2.5). City shall grant the Project Team site access and permits to perform all field work.
66 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Deliverables:
 Additional Geotechnical Borings and trenching parameters Subtask 6.6: S Washington Dr Widening Environmental Compliance  This task includes additional environmental analysis for the S Washington Dr Widening project.
 Additional analysis would include environmental surveys (biological and archaeological), records search for the additional areas, and CEQA analysis for the additional project components.
 The draft and final environmental documents will include analysis and environmental compliance for both the stormwater drainage project and the S Washington Dr Widening.

Optional Subtask 6.7: Record of Survey Water St
City must provide written authorization for Consultant to perform this task.

This task also provides for Record of Survey in the event that maps need to correcting related to the UPRR/Water St work in Task 6.1.

Deliverables:
 Record of Survey at UPRR/Water St
67 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

SCHEDULE OF FEES:
*See table on next page for inclusion in Task 6.2

TASK DESCRIPTION REMAINING
FEES

REMAINING
ODCs
%

EXPENDED

REPURPOSE FOR S

WASHINGTON DR
TASK 6

5.1 Creek Survey $9,145.00 $1,445.86 76% No

5.2 Creek
Geotechnical
$6,274.50 $32.74 68% No

5.3 Creek Modeling,
Flow Monitoring,
Calibration
$25,675.50 $1,592.86 54% No

5.4 Creek Permitting $52,920.00 0% No

5.5 Creek
Stabilization and
Improvements
50% PS&E
$19,476.00 0% Yes*

5.6 Creek
Stabilization and
Improvements
100% PS&E
$13,200.00 0% Yes*

5.7 Creek
Stabilization and
Improvements
Final PS&E
$6,020.00 0% Yes*
Keep in Task 5 $41,095.00 $3,071.46
Repurpose for Task 6* $38,696.00
68 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

*Includes $38,696 repurposed fees from Tasks 5.5, 5.6, and 5.7 CONTRACT SUMMARY:

DESCRIPTION FEES
Prime Agreement minus Repurposed
Task 5.5, 5.6, 5.7 Fees
$1,244,269 - $38,696 = $1,205,573
ASA 01 (without Optional Tasks) $217,840
Total (without Optional Tasks) $1,423,413
ASA 01Optional Tasks $12,657
Total (with Optional Tasks) $1,436,070

TASK DESCRIPTION FEE TYPE FEES

6.1 Water St ROW and Easements T&M NTE $27,756

6.2 50% PS&E S Washington Dr
Surface Improvements*
T&M NTE $26,151 + $38,696 = $64,847

6.3 100% PS&E S Washington Dr
Surface Improvements
T&M NTE $33,708

6.4 Final PS&E S Washington Dr
Surface Improvements
T&M NTE $16,525

6.5 Geotechnical Borings for
McCloud Ave and S
Washington Dr
T&M NTE $4,867

6.6 S Washington Dr Widening
Environmental Compliance
T&M NTE $8,379

6.7 Optional Record of Survey T&M NTE $12,657
ODCs $61,758
Total (without Optional Tasks): T&M NTE $217,840
Total (Optional Tasks Only): T&M NTE $12,657
69 Mt Shasta Planning and Design of Stormwater Drainage City of Mount Shasta
Additional Service Authorization 01
5/15/2026

Any work outside the scope of the original agreement between Progression Engineering and the Client, and authorized by the Client, is subject to the Terms and Conditions of the Prime Agreement.

Fee Footnotes
A. Estimated fees for tasks shown as “Time and Materials - Not to Exceed” (T&M/NTE) establish the maximum that will be billed for each task. Amounts billed will reflect actual hours and will not exceed the maximum amount shown without prior approval by the Client.

EXHIBITS. All exhibits and schedules to this Agreement as referenced in any portion hereof are hereby incorporated by this reference, as though fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.

AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED BY CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE:

Sign Date

Print Name, Title
70 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM #14
MEETING DATE: June 08, 2026
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Local Transportation Funds
RECOMMENDATION:

We respectfully request Council adopt the proposed resolution CCR-25-XX, A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta Claiming the City’s Apportionment of Local Transportation Funds in the amount of $139,092 of which $49,365.00 is Claimed for Streets and Road Purposes and the Balance to Be Used for Unmet Public Transit Needs, and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Claim.

BACKGROUND:

Every year the State of California makes available to local jurisdictions a portion of the revenues collected from gasoline and other transportation taxes, pursuant to Section 99260 and 99400 of the Public Utilities Code. The Local Transportation Commission (LTC) is the administrator of these funds for each County. The distribution of funds available each year is primarily based on population estimates compiled by the State Department of Finance.

The first call of these funds is for unmet public transportation needs as determined by the Local Transportation Commission. The LTC periodically hold public hearings at various locations in the County to determine those needs. The cities and other local jurisdictions are then allowed to claim their respective shares of the remaining balances for street and road purposes. The estimated amount of allocation for 2026-2027 is estimated to be $49,365.00. The LTC has determined that $89,727.00 is needed for unmet public transit needs that are reasonable to meet the STAGE operating budget for the year.

Over the years, the City has reserved these Local Transportation Funds for the purpose of major reconstruction projects, so these funds do not necessarily affect day-to-day operations but will affect long range infrastructure needs of the City.

ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution with Claim
X Regular Session
Special Session
Emergency
Session
Closed Session
71 RESOLUTION CCR-26-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF MT. SHASTA
CLAIMING THE CITY’S APPORTIONMENT

OF LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $139,092.00 OF WHICH
$ 49,365.00 IS CLAIMED FOR STREETS AND ROADS PURPOSES
AND THE BALANCE OF $89,727.00 IS TO BE USED

FOR UNMET PUBLIC TRANSIT NEEDS

AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CLAIM
WHEREAS, the State Transportation Development Act makes Local Transportation Funds available to Cities and Counties; and
WHEREAS, these funds may be claimed for streets and roads purposes, but only after public transit needs have been met; and
WHEREAS, Siskiyou County has determined the public transit needs will require $89,727 of the City’s apportionment for the fiscal year.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta that a claim in the amount of one-hundred thirty-nine thousand eight hundred twenty-five dollars and zero cents ($139,092.00), of which $89,727.00 shall be used for public transit and $49,365.00 shall be used for streets and road purposes, is made against the Local Transportation Fund for Siskiyou County for fiscal year 2026-2027.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute the attached claim on behalf of the City.
*****************
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted this 8th day of June, 2026 by the City Council of the City of Mt. Shasta by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

DATED: June 8, 2026
CITY OF MT. SHASTA
_____________________________
ATTEST: Casey Glaubman, Mayor
_____________________________
Rachel Agron, Deputy City Clerk
72 Siskiyou County Local Transportation Commission
Local Transportation Fund Transportation Claim
To:

From:

A. Funding Available (Not Claimed)

1. Funds from prior years

2. Current Estimated Allocations
B. Total Amount Claimed

1. By Funding Source
c. Total Claimed

2. By Purpose
(Chapter 4, Part 11, Division 10 of P.U.C.)
2026/2027 139,092.00 $
Fiscal Year 2026/2027
Siskiyou County Local Transportation Commission
City of Mount Shasta
(Claimant)
This applicant, qualified pursuant to section 99203 of the Public Utilities Code, hereby requests, in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the Transportation Development Act as enacted and amended by statute to January 1, 2011, that its claim be approved in the amount of:
$ 139,092.00
a. Estimated funds with County Auditor 7/1/2026 $ -
$ 139,092.00
a. Estimated funds with County Auditor $ -
b. Current Estimated Allocations 2026/2027 139,092.00 $ $ 139,092.00
a. Public Transit [Art 4, Sec 99260 (a)] $ 89,727.00
b. Streets/Roads [Art 8, Sec 99400 (a)] $ 49,365.00
c. Other $ -
d. Total Claimed $ 139,092.00
1 of 2
73 Siskiyou County Local Transportation Commission
Local Transportation Fund Transportation Claim
By:

Date:

By:

Date:

Approved:

City of Mt Shasta
Mayor
Siskiyou County Local Transportation Commission
Transportation Commission Executive Director
The claimant herewith recognizes that any allocations for streets and roads will be made in accordance with, but not limited to, Section 99401.5, Article 8, Chapter 4, Part 11, Division 10 of the Public Utilities Code. This section stipulates that the Local Transportation Commission must annually review unmet transit needs and determine if they are reasonable to meet prior to making any allocation of funding for streets and roads.

After obtaining approval by the governing body please transmit this claim for payment from the Local Transportation Fund to the following address:

Siskiyou County Local Transportation Commission
190 Greenhorn Road
Yreka, CA 96097
Approval of the claim and payment by the County Auditor is subject to such monies being on hand and available for distribution and to the provisions that such monies will be used in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Transportation Development Act. 2 of 2
74 City Council Agenda Item #15
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Todd Juhasz, City Manager
SUBJECT: Renewal of the lease between the City of Mt Shasta and the Mt Shasta Recreation and Parks District
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager to execute a one-year renewal of the Lease Agreement between the City of Mt. Shasta and the Mt. Shasta Recreation and Parks District, commencing July 1, 2026, with no changes to the existing agreement.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Mt. Shasta currently leases the City Park Upper Lodge Building located at 1315 Nixon Road from the Mt. Shasta Recreation and Parks District. The facility is used by the City for City Council meetings, Planning Commission meetings, and other authorized City committee meetings.

The current lease term runs through June 30, 2026. The existing agreement provides for the City of Mt Shasta to use of the premises in exchange for rent of $200.00 per meeting per month for two (2) City Council meetings and one (1) Planning Commission meeting, with additional meetings billed at $100.00 per meeting per month. The District provides utilities at no additional charge and furnishes storage space for City meeting equipment.

DISCUSSION:

Both parties have been satisfied with the terms and operation of the current lease. Staff recommend renewing the agreement for an additional one-year term beginning July 1, 2026, and terminating June 30, 2027, with no modifications to any existing provisions. All terms, conditions, and obligations of the original agreement, including rent, utilities, indemnification, and storage arrangements, shall remain in full force and effect.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no change in fiscal impact from the prior year. The City will continue to pay $200.00 per meeting per month for the two (2) scheduled City Council meetings and one (1) Planning Commission meeting, and $100.00 per meeting per month for any additional City-approved meetings.

X Regular
Consent
Closed
Presentation
75 LEASE OF MOUNT SHASTA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT FACILITY THIS LEASE, made and entered into this 1st day of July, 2026, by and between the CITY OF MT. SHASTA hereinafter called the “City”, and the MOUNT SHASTA RECREATION AND PARKS DISTRICT, a body politic, hereinafter called the “District”.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the District is the owner of certain real property located at 1315 Nixon Road, and commonly known as, The City Park Upper Lodge Building hereinafter referred to as the Recreation Center Building; and
WHEREAS, the City is desirous of leasing said City Park Upper Lodge Building from the District for a period of time and under certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the District is desirous of accepting a lease from the City for said City Park Upper Lodge Building,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD AS FOLLOWS:

1. DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: The District hereby leases and lets unto the City, those certain premises described as the City Park Upper Lodge Building.

2. TERM: This lease shall be for a term of one (1) year, commencing on July 1, 2026, and terminating on June 30, 2027.

3. CONSIDERATION: The City shall pay to the District the sum of Two Hundred Dollar ($200.00) per meeting per month for two (2) City Council meetings, scheduled for the 2nd and 4th. Monday of each month, and one (1) meeting of the City Planning Commission, scheduled for the 3rd Tuesday of each month, as rent for the leased premises; this payment shall be payable the first day of each month during the effective period of this lease. 76 3A. ADDITIONAL RENTS: City shall pay to the District the amount of One Hundred ($100.00) dollars per meeting per month for any City approved meeting that is in addition to the Two (2) City Council meetings and One (1) Planning Commission meeting set forth in Paragraph 3 above.

4. UTILITIES USE: The District shall furnish the City water necessary for sanitation and domestic use without charge but said water shall be put to reasonable use and shall not be wasted. District shall make all arrangements for and pay for all utilities and services furnished to or used by City, including, without limitation, gas, electricity, telephone service, and trash collection, and for no additional charge.

5. INDEMNIFICATION : City agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District against all claims and damages arising out of City’s use of the leased premises. District agrees to indemnity, defend, and hold harmless the City against all claims and damages arising of the Districts ownership or use of said premises.

6. TAXES: In the event there are any taxes and/or assessments on the leased property during or for the leased period, the District shall pay the taxes and/or assessments.

7. MAINTENANCE: The City agrees to accept the buildings upon the subject premises in as is condition upon the date of execution of this lease.

8. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the City shall neither assign this lease nor sublet the premises 77 unless the written consent of the District is obtained as a condition precedent to such assignment or subletting.

9. ALTERATIONS OF STRUCTURES AND GROUNDS: The City shall not materially alter, move or destroy any buildings or structures on the premises or alter the grounds themselves without first obtaining written consent from the District.

10. FREEZING CONDITIONS: The District acknowledges that it is aware that freezing conditions exist in the area of the premises and agrees to protect the plumbing upon the premises from freezing and further to remove snow from the roofs of the buildings upon the premises and further to be responsible for the plowing of snow necessary to clear the roads upon the premises.

11. USES: It is agreed by and between the parties hereto that the premises shall be used by the City of Mt. Shasta for meeting purposes only, and specifically that the City shall use the subject premises for the purpose of conducting City Council, City Planning Commission and City Committee meetings with the general public.

12. DESTRUCTION AND RESTORATION: If, during the term, the premises or the buildings and other improvements in which the premises are located are totally or partially destroyed from a risk covered by insurance, rendering the premises totally or partially inaccessible or unusable, District shall restore the premises or the buildings and other improvements in which the premises are located to substantially the same condition as they were in immediately before destruction. Such destruction shall not terminate this lease. 78 13. MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION: Disputes Subject to Mediation and Arbitration: Any dispute between the parties relating to the interpretation and enforcement of their rights and obligations under this lease to be the subject of mediation and arbitration shall be resolved solely by mediation and arbitration in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 17 of this lease. Initial Mediation: With respect to any dispute between the parties that is to be resolved by arbitration as provided in paragraph 17, which has not been resolved between the parties themselves, the parties shall attempt in good faith first to mediate such dispute and use their best efforts to reach agreement on the matters in dispute. Within 5 days of the request of any party, the requesting party shall attempt to employ the services of a third person mutually acceptable to the parties to conduct such mediation within 5 days of his or her appointment. If the parties are unable to agree on such third person, or, if on completion of such mediation, the parties are unable to agree and settle the dispute, then the dispute shall be referred to arbitration in accordance with paragraph 17.

Arbitration: Any dispute between the parties that is to be resolved by arbitration as provided in paragraph 17 shall be settled and decided by arbitration conducted by the American Arbitration Association in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association, as then in effect, except as provided below. Any such arbitration shall be held and conducted in Mt. Shasta, CA before one arbitrator who shall be selected by mutual agreement of the parties; if agreement is not reached on the selection of an arbitrator within 15 days, then such arbitrator shall be 79 appointed by the presiding judge of the superior court of the county in which the arbitration is to be conducted.

The provisions of the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association shall apply and govern such arbitration, subject, however, to the following:
(a) Any demand for arbitration shall be in writing and must be made within a reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in question has arisen. In no event shall the demand for arbitration be made after the date that institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claim, dispute, or other matter would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
(b) The arbitrator appointed must be former or retired judges or "attorneys" with at least 10 years experience in real property and commercial matters, or non-attorneys with like experience in the area of dispute.
(c) Final decision by the arbitrator or arbitrators must be made within 90 days from the date the arbitration proceedings are initiated. (d) The prevailing party shall be awarded reasonable attorneys' fees, expert and non-expert witness costs and expenses, and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with the arbitration, unless the arbitrator for good cause determines otherwise.
(e) Costs and fees of the arbitrator shall be borne by the non-prevailing party, unless the arbitrator or arbitrators for good cause determine otherwise.
80 (f) The award or decision of the arbitrator, which may include equitable relief, shall be final and judgment may be entered on it in accordance with applicable law in any court having jurisdiction over the matter.
(g) The provisions of Title 9 of Part 3 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, including §1283.05, and successor statutes, permitting expanded discovery proceedings shall be applicable to all disputes which are arbitrated pursuant to this paragraph.

14. DISTRICT’S ENTRY ON PREMISES: District and its authorized representatives shall have the right to enter the premises at all reasonable times to determine whether the premises are in good condition and whether City is complying with its obligations under this lease. District shall not be liable in any manner for any inconvenience, disturbance, loss of business, nuisance, or other damage arising out of District’s entry on the premises as provided in this paragraph, except damage resulting from the acts or omissions of District or its authorized representatives. District shall conduct its activities on the premises as allowed in this paragraph in a manner that will cause the lease possible inconvenience, annoyance, or disturbance to City.

15. NOTICE: Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party or any other person shall be in writing and served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail, or by overnight courier (e.g., Federal Express, UPS). Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that either party desires or is required to give to the other party shall be addressed to the other 81 party at its regular business address. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address. Notice shall be deemed communicated when delivered or within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this paragraph.

16. WAIVER: No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of District on any default by City shall impair such a right or remedy or be construed as a waiver.

17. SURRENDER OF PREMISES; HOLDING OVER: On expiration or within 10 days after termination of the term, City shall surrender to District the premises and all City’s improvements and alterations in good condition (except for ordinary wear and tear). City shall remove all its personal property within the above stated time.

18. ATTORNEY’S FEES: If either party becomes a party to any litigation concerning this lease, the premises, or the buildings or other improvements in which the premises are located, by reason of any act or omission of the other party or its authorized representatives, and not by any act or omission of the party that becomes a party to that litigation or any act or omission of its authorized representatives, the party that causes the other party to become involved in the litigation shall be liable to that party for reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs incurred by it in the litigation.

If either party commences an action against the other party arising out of or in connection with this lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred in that litigation or action.
82 19. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS:

A. General Conditions: Time is of the essence of each provision of this lease.

Whenever consent or approval of either party is required, that party shall not unreasonably withhold such consent or approval. This lease shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors.

Rent and all other sums payable under this lease must be paid in lawful money of the United States of America. This lease shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. This lease contains all the agreements of the parties. All provisions, whether covenants or conditions, on the part of District shall be deemed to be both covenants and conditions. The captions of this lease shall have no effect on its interpretation. When required by the context of this lease, the singular shall include the plural. The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid, or illegal.

B. STORAGE: By mutual agreement between the District and the City, the District will provide storage space for meeting related equipment in the City Park Upper Lodge Building to facilitate the set – up for monthly meetings. The District will assure City equipment is securely stored at all times and readily accessible for meeting set – ups as scheduled. The inventory of stored items is as follows:
• Nameplates and Gavel
• Table Linens
• Microphones (10)
83 C. Use of Definitions: The definitions contained in this lease shall be used to interpret this lease. As used in this lease, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:

Authorized Representative: Any officer, agent, employee, or independent contractor retained or employed by either party, acting within authority given him by that party.

Damage: Injury, deterioration, or loss to a person or property caused by another person’s acts or omissions. Damage includes death.

Damages: A monetary compensation or indemnity that can be recovered in the courts by any person who has suffered damage to his person, property, or rights through another’s act or omission.

Destruction: Any damage, as defined here, to or disfigurement of the premises.

Encumbrance: Any deed of trust, mortgage, or other written security device or agreement affecting the premises, and the note or other obligation secured by it, that constitutes security for the payment of a debt or performance of an obligation.

Expiration: The coming to an end of the time specified in the lease as its duration, including any extension of the term resulting from the exercise of an option to extend.

Good Condition: The good physical condition of the premises and each portion of the premises, including, without limitation, signs, windows, show windows, appurtenances, and District’s personal property as defined 84 here. “In good condition” means first-class, neat, clean, and broom-clean, and is equivalent to similar phrases referring to physical adequacy in appearance and for use.

Hold Harmless: To defend and indemnify from all liability, losses, penalties, damages as defined here, costs, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees), causes of action, claims, or judgments arising out of or related to any damage, as defined here, to any person or property.

Law: Any judicial decision, statute, constitution, ordinance, resolution, regulation, rule, administrative order, or other requirement of any municipal, county, state, federal, or other government agency or authority having jurisdiction over the parties or the premises, or both, in effect either at the time of execution of the lease or at any time during the term, including, without limitation, any regulation or order of a quasi-official entity or body (e.g., board of fire examiners or public utilities).

Lender: The beneficiary, mortgagee, secured party, or other holder of an encumbrance, as defined here.

Lien: A charge imposed on the premises by someone other than the District, by which the premises are made security for the performance of an act. Most of the liens referred to in this lease are mechanics’ liens.

Maintenance: Repairs, replacement, repainting, and cleaning.

Person: One or more human beings, or legal entities or other artificial persons, including, without limitation, partnerships, corporations, trusts, estates, associations, and any combination of human beings and legal entitles.
85 Provision: Any term, agreement, covenant, condition, clause, qualification, restriction, reservation, or other stipulation in the lease that defines or otherwise controls, establishes, or limits the performance required or permitted by either party.

Rent: Annual rent, taxes and assessments, insurance, utilities, and other similar charges payable by City to or for the District.

Restoration: The reconstruction, rebuilding, rehabilitation, and repairs that are necessary to return destroyed portions of the premises and other property to substantially the same physical condition as they were in immediately before the destruction.

Successor: Assignee, transferee, personal representative, heir, or other person or entity succeeding lawfully, and pursuant to the provisions of this lease, to the rights or obligations of either party.

Term: The period of time during which District has a right to occupy the premises.

Termination: The ending of the term for any reason before expiration, as defined here.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed in duplicate the day and year first above written.

CITY OF MT. SHASTA
BY_________________________________
Casey Glaubman, Mayor
86 ATTEST:
_________________________________
Rachel Agron, Deputy City Clerk
MT. SHASTA RECREATION AND PARKS DISTRICT
BY_________________________________
Shannon Shaw
District Administrator

87 EXHIBIT “A”
The following real property is located in the County of Siskiyou, State of California, and more particularly described as follows, to-wit:

Beginning at the one-quarter section corner common to Sections Eight (8) and Nine (9) in Township Forty (40) North, Range Four (4) West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence south on section line 123.65 feet to a point; thence west 755.5 feet to a point; thence north 848.4 feet; more or less, to a point on the Southern Pacific Railroad Company’s right-of-way line, which point is 100 feet southerly from the center line of said railroad; thence following said right-ofway easterly 770 feet more or less to a point on the section line between said Sections Eight (8) and Nine (9); thence south 87º 12’ east following the said railroad right-of-way line 100 feet more or less to a point; thence south 40º 55’ 30” east 89.83 feet following said railroad right-ofway to a point, which point is the beginning of a curve to the right, said curve having a radius of 875.04 feet; thence continuing along said curve a distance of 684.46 feet to a point; thence continuing southerly on said railroad right-of-way line 20 feet more or less to a point on the quarter section line in said Section Nine (9); thence west on said quarter section line 590.35 feet more or less to the point of beginning, containing 19 acres more or less.

Subject to any reservations, restrictions, conditions, easements and rights-of-way of record.

Reserving unto the State, and persons authorized by it, all oil, gas, oil shale, coal, phosphate, sodium, gold, silver, and all other mineral deposits, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove such deposits and to occupy and use as much of the surface of said real property as may be required therefore, in accordance with law.
88 City Council Agenda Item #16
Staff Report
MEETING DATE: June 8, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Kim Fowler, Planning Director
SUBJECT: The Landing – Conceptual Master Plan Approval

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve GHD’s contract for the development of a Conceptual Master Plan for “The Landing.”

BACKGROUND
The property known as “The Landing” consists of approximately 115 acres and is located at the south end of Mt. Shasta Boulevard on both the east and west sides of the roadway. The property on the east side of Mt. Shasta Boulevard is located just south of Church Street (APNs 067-010- 010, 067-010-020). The property on the west side of Mt. Shasta is just south of Ream Avenue and adjacent to Mountain View Drive which is directly east of the property (APN 067-010-020) and is located approximately 1.5 miles from the historic downtown core of Mount Shasta, providing proximity to existing civic, commercial, and recreational amenities. The site is the former location of a lumber mill that has been remediated via an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Brownfield Grant. The site has been certified by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and is subject to a few restrictions via a land use covenant (“LUC”).

The property was declared as surplus land by the Mt. Shasta City Council via Resolution CCR-24- 04 on January 13, 2025. In accordance with Assembly Bill 1486, a 'Notice of Availability' was issued by the City on June 23, 2025, to solicit notices of interest from qualified parties to purchase the land from the City of Mt. Shasta for future development. At the end of the sixty (60) day notice period, one letter of interest was received. The City is currently in the process of good faith negotiations with the lone respondent.

In March 2026, the City issued a Request for Proposals with a budget of $200,000 in remaining EPA Brownfield Grant Dollars for a consultant team to prepare a Conceptual Master Plan for The Landing. The purpose of this Master Plan is to help guide the development group in establishing a strategic roadmap and guiding framework for future development to be guided by community input developed over three (3) town hall meetings. The Master Plan will define a long-term vision that reflects what the community would like to see developed while being driven by the economics required in order to viably develop the property in stages.

X Regular
Consent
Closed
Presentation
89 The selected firm, in collaboration with its consultants, will prepare a comprehensive conceptual master plan that establishes the organizational framework and mixed-use development strategy.

The conceptual Master Planning effort is anticipated to be completed within a five (5) month timeframe from Notice to Proceed. Town Hall, Planning Commission and City Council meeting dates are tentative:

RFP Issuance March 26, 2026
Deadline for Written Questions April 16, 2026
Deadline for Submitting a Proposal April 23, 2026
Consultant Selected May 29, 2026
City Council Consultant Approval June 8, 2026
Notice to Proceed June 9, 2026
Town Hall Meeting # 1 July 14, 2026
Town Hall Meeting # 2 August 11, 2026
Town Hall Meeting # 3 September 9, 2026
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 15, 2026
City Council Public Hearing October 12, 2026
City Council Public Hearing October 26, 2026
On April 16th, a total of 14 responses were received; the interview panel consisted of the City Manager, Planning Director, Public Works Director, and Chief of Police. They selected the five (5) highest scoring firms to conduct Q&A sessions via Teams meetings between May 7th and May 19th.

While many good proposals were received, one firm earned a near-perfect score of 99 out of 100. GHD’s proposal (Attachment A) not only demonstrated a clear understanding of what the City of Mt. Shasta needs, they went above and beyond in their Q&A session to assure the City that they were the right consultants for the job. Below are some key topics they will address during the process:
• Consideration for a balance of tourism and local needs • Proposal for the development of flexible, low-cost light industrial space to support local entrepreneurs and the creation of living-wage jobs
• Economics as a design driver
• Consideration of the site as a gateway to the community and the region • Community input on phasing development over time
• The inclusion of housing that is “affordable by design” to help address the lack of workforce housing
90 • Consideration for development that doesn’t directly compete with local businesses • Consideration of trips generated by development over time and how to mitigate it

FISCAL IMPACT
None; the $175,000 allocated budget comes from EPA cleanup grant funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA does not apply where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment (CEQA, Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3)).

Attachment A GHD Proposal
Attachment B GHD Revised Scope of Work and Fee
Attachment C Draft City of Mt. Shasta and GHD Contract
91 The Landing: Conceptual
Master Plan
City of Mount Shasta  April 23, 2026
Proposal
GHD Inc. | 2600 Capitol Ave Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95816 Point of Contact: Jonathan LInkus
T: +1 949 585-5265 | E: [email protected]
92 II
→Cover Letter 1
→Firm Profile & Project Leads 4
→Understanding & Approach 7
→Relevant Project Experience 10
→Scope of Work 17
→Fee Proposal & Workplan 22
→Resumes & References 24
© GHD 2026: This document is and shall remain the property of GHD. The document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorized use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: GHD and Linda S. Congleton Associates have no actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest, including any financial or professional relationships with property owners, developers, or other stakeholders associated with the project site.

Contents
93 1
f Cover Letter
Downtown revitalization concept for a Sonoma region
community - wayfinding and landscape in synergy
94 2
GHD | 2600 Capitol Ave Suite 100, Sacramento, CA 95816 | T: +1.916.372.6606 | www.ghd.com 2 95
3 96
4 f Firm Profile
& Project Leaders
Community activity immediately after our completed
Downtown Redding public works project.
97 5
Lasting Community Benefits
Firm Profile
GHD provides transportation planning and engineering,
environmental, architectural, advisory, digital, and
construction services to private and public sector clients.

Operating globally and delivering services locally, we offer clients the ability to develop a working relationship with our local staff while having access to our global experience base. Put simply, we work where our clients work. Our
business model is to work internationally and deliver
locally.

Established in 1928, GHD is a wholly-owned subsidiary - a privately held international engineering firm owned by our people and operating across five continents. We are one of the world’s leading professional services companies
operating in the global markets of Transportation, Water, Energy & Resources, Environment, and Property &
Buildings. Our people can offer decades of knowledge,
as well as a deep understanding of the challenges
facing businesses and communities today. We deliver
projects with high standards of safety, quality, and ethics across the entire asset value chain. Driven by a client service-led culture, we connect the knowledge, skill,
and experience of our people with innovative practices, technical capabilities, and robust systems to create lasting community benefits.

GHD's Services
GHD has an excellent performance record with municipal
and government agencies throughout California. Many
of GHD’s past and current projects include the following services:
– Water and Wastewater Utility Design
– Architecture
– Traffic Planning and Engineering
– Active Transportation
– Transportation Planning/Design
– Complete Streets/Streetscape Design
– Civil Engineering
– Landscape Architecture/Wayfinding
– Roundabout Planning/Design
– Construction Management
– Land/Construction Surveying
– Public Outreach & Interagency Coordination
– Maritime and Coastal Design
– Building and Facility MEP
– Structural Design and Evaluation
– Drainage, Floodplain, and Erosion Control Design and
Analysis
– Funding Assistance
GHD

FAST FACTS
GHD Established 1928
Number of Offices
in California 15
Global GHD Staff 12K
Number of Staff in
Northern California
ISO Certified
270+
9001
Workshop for Downtown Beaumont Revitalization with
development alternatives and aligned regional economic data 98 Project Manager
Jonathan Linkus, AICP,

LEED AP
Economic Strategy
Linda S. Congleton
Project Director
Todd Tregenza, AICP

COLLABORATIVE PROJECT TEAM
Project Leads
GHD brings a responsive team with extensive experience that covers all required areas of this project. Our project manager, Jonathan Linkus, AICP, LEED AP, has led two California specific plans, three university master plans, several economic development-oriented master plans, and provided site design leadership to numerous mixed use development projects. He, and Linda Congleton will be the City’s most frequent project contacts and will be the primary delivery professionals on the team. Resumes for all assembled team members are included in the last section.

City of Mount Shasta
Planning Director
Kim Fowler
Linda S. Congleton | Economics and Development Strategy Years of Exp: 41 | Office: Irvine, CA
Qualifications: MBA, Finance, Real Estate, Marketing, Stanford University Graduate School of Business Why Linda. Linda will be the Economics and Development Strategy role on this master plan project due to her extensive experience and expertise in real estate and urban development. As the Principal and founder of L.S. Congleton & Associates, Linda has a strong educational background from Stanford University and UC Berkeley. Her career includes managing significant projects at Nu-West and Robert Charles Lesser & Co., and she has been actively involved with the Urban Land Institute and the International Council of Shopping Centers. Linda’s proven track record in consulting, teaching, and speaking on real estate market and financial issues makes her uniquely qualified to drive the economic and development strategy for this ambitious project.

Todd Tregenza, AICP | Project Director
Years of Exp: 18 | Office: Sacramento, CA
Qualifications: BS, Community and Regional Development, University of California, Davis Why Todd. Todd will serve as the project director role for the project. Todd has 18 years of experience in transportation planning and multidisciplinary project leadership. He has successfully led numerous multi-modal transportation projects, including corridor studies, complete streets plans, and safety analyses. Todd’s expertise in transportation programming, funding strategies, and grant application support, combined with his extensive experience in public outreach and stakeholder engagement, makes him highly qualified to lead this project.

Key Team Bios & Qualifications
Jonathan Linkus, AICP, LEED AP | Project Manager & Urban Planner Years of Exp: 16 | Office: Irvine, CA
Qualifications: MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge Why Jonathan. Jonathan will be the project manager for the Conceptual Master Plan due to his extensive experience in community planning and development. With over 16 years of experience, he has successfully led numerous public and private projects, including downtown revitalization plans and specific plans. His expertise in community master planning, public outreach, and urban design, combined with his track record of award-winning projects, makes him highly qualified to lead this initiative.

Jonathan’s ability to integrate diverse disciplines, his familiarity with economic strategy shaped planning , and economic catalystic development concepts, all align perfectly with the City’s project requirements 6 “As our Project Manager and the site design lead, I’m thrilled about this project because the site is the best development opportunity and simultaneously the “establishing shot” of the community. Framing the highway view of Shasta Peak, and bridging between regional travellers and Mt. Shasta’s own small downtown, this will be the gateway to the city.
- Jonathan Linkus, AICP LEED AP | Proposed Project Manager 99 7
f Understanding &
Approach
Community young and senior all collaborating on
detailed design decisions through our outreach process
100
8 Project Understanding & Approach
Economic Strategy as Design Driver
The Landing Mount Shasta Commerce Park Area Wide
Plan (2016) presented a number of potential
commercial, recreation, hotel, residential and
civic/community development uses. The study lacked
economic, market or competition research to support
these uses. This is a major void of the study that would be easily recognized by experienced financial and
developer partners.

No sales, brokerage or marketing efforts can overcome
the lack of strong market research support for proposed Area Plan targeted uses. Even sites without the
environmental history of The Landing require excellent
market and economic research support to attract highly
experienced development/financial partners. And in
today’s post-Covid, high inflation, high construction cost, developer market, this is even more true.

Civic/community, open space and recreational uses
should also be analyzed in terms of demand potential;
initial construction costs; and on-going maintenance
costs—especially since most civic/community uses are
cost-draining uses.

Time and again, stakeholder developers across
California and Nevada will tell GHD Staff, “I know Linda’s work.” In the City of Reno, alone, Sparks Victorian
Square, Rancharrah, and the Reno Experience District
(RED district), are all built and leased. Her approach is especially hands-on with local business owners and
brokers, and with specific (often novel) tenancies
considered throughout her process.

The GHD team is proud to collaborate once again with
Linda S. Congleton Associates (LSCA), whose work is
known for producing programs that result in built
developments. They are highly experienced with
recreation/tourism cities desiring to rejuvenate and boost their local attractions and civic amenities for both local residents and overnight visitors. One of their specialties is creating economically viable development
implementation plans for small towns. Their goal for this Conceptual Master Plan will be to deliver a viable,
achievable development program that is financially
feasible in evolving residential, lodging, commercial, and light-industrial markets.

Tourism and Local Needs Intersect
Tourism remains a key driver in the local economy. The
Census Bureau in 2024 measured Mt. Shasta’s
population at 3,182. The Mt. Shasta Chamber estimates
that 26,000 visitors attended the visitor’s pavilion while 68,000 sought information through its visitor web page.

Our initial research into hotel type, size, and occupancy across Mt. Shasta and three surrounding municipalities, together with the large number of visitors relative to local population suggests strength in this sector. Lodging
positioned in view of the highway, but walkable to
downtown, with a specific brand that does not compete
with existing Mt. Shasta businesses is an example of our thinking which “reinforces rather than competes” with
downtown.

The Long Life Loose Fit of Flex Industrial
Local entrepreneurs need low-cost, easily fireproofed,
and flexible high-bay space typically found in light
industrial complexes. This suits the kind of wood
product business described by the City. However, these
complexes often lack: 1) visibility within their
development, 2) inviting shopfront design connected to a walkable pedestrian network, and 3) form a cohesive
urban
environment that
includes civic
uses. We
believe strongly
in the “loose fit,
long life” of
industrial flex –
the predominant
use shown in the
2015 Area Wide
Plan. However, it
needs to be
configured to
101
9 directly face pedestrian-oriented streetcapes and
hardscape common areas. In the example below,
outdoor dining infrastructure is planned-for, connected to a mutli-modal street, and shares connection to public
space with three other locally owned food and beverage
businesses. This emphasis on outdoor dining is a
repeatable success in the context of a comprehensive
urban design that considered roadway noise, views to
natural features, shading, and selective visibility of
shopfronts to roadways. In essence, a “spec”
development flex industrial can succeed if it supports a sense of place and is designed for visitors as well as
logistics access.

Site as Gateway to the Community and Region
The site embodies a link between the regional and the
local, where the first of three offramps into the City invite visitors past the site and into downtown. Moreover, the site provides the first “establishing shot” of Mt. Shasta, seen below from the site with charismatic autumn
lenticular harbingers of an oncoming winter storm. This view corridor we will consider in massing, layout, and
shading analysis.

The configuration of S. Mt. Shasta Blvd and frontages
along this road should be part of a multimodal and
landscape-framed environment with support for transit
connections into downtown – especially for on-site
workers and hotel visitors.

Design for Achievable Phasing with the Public
The key challenge we face is to determine which
program uses can be most economically viable on a
portion of the site which requires minimal infrastructure mains investment as a first phase. This does not mean
there is only one solution to district-wide design, and we intend to share knowledge of this decision process with the public in the three intended workshops. In this way, GHD specializes in “co creative design” – where
community stakeholders are brought-along inside the
design critical path, rather than informed and asked
about it from the outside. We recently succeed in
completing a challenging community decision process in
the City of Ukiah – where precious streetscape
environments were reimagined by including workshop
attendees in all of the decision factors (outdoor “walking” workshop depicted below).

Economically Competitive Cohesive Environment
Ultimately, we work collaboratively through an internal and client-inclusive workshop “charette” style that
includes the LSCA team and our civil engineers to create more development concepts integrated in their
landscape and surroundings. Open space and
recreation assets need to be part of a “geometric and
legible whole” rather than placed aside or along other
land uses in a grid. This allows open space,
landscapes, and development types to work in synergy
to share an economic synergy.

Live-Work-Play Setting
The inclusion of affordable housing is important to
supporting a local workforce, important community
members such as teachers, municipal and county
employees, and in-turn supports small businesses on
site with an on-site population. Here, open space
connections to downtown, regional trails, and common
open space that also benefits businesses and a hotel on the development site means cohesive urban design can
create efficiency and synergy.

Our goal for affordable housing is to ascertain housing types attractive to developers with the right intensity (FAR, height) appropriate to the sense of context among community members. Affordable housing developer
stakeholders in our recent California master plans
needed scalable two and three story housing types
which minimized the cost of parking and site
infrastructure. We have planned over 1600 units of
affordable housing within “conceptual” long range master plans for California communities in the last three years alone.

We aspire to The Landing as a true live-work-play
gateway into a revitalizing Mount Shasta community.
102
10 f Relevant Project
Experience
Regional trail, cafe, and affordable housing, and shaded open space together in our La Quinta Highway 111 Plan
103
11 Project Description
La Quinta’s Highway 111 Corridor is the commercial and
retail heart of the Coachella Valley and go-to for services, goods, and dining; but, the City seeks to transform this into a “downtown setting” for new residents in a more walkable, livable, and economically diverse mixed-use district. GHD has worked to elevate an existing 2019 “Vision” document to a full specific plan that includes infill housing, new workplace uses, walkable main street environments, and
improved public realm along regional bikeway and cultural trail corridors.

This specific plan consists of four major elements:
– A comprehensive land-use driven district plan
– A form-based code drive by architectural guidelines allencompassing development standards – A CEQA environmental assessment expected to lead to
an IS/MND
– Pre-engineering designs for a complete streets
enhancement, pedestrian safety and public realm
improvement along Highway 111 and its collector side
streets
Key to this project is a detailed Market, Real Estate and Development Strategy prepared by L. S. Congleton
Associates. Business and development stakeholder
interviews, market context, supported by leasing data
have been integrated to inform land use and investment
decision-making. The result is a Specific Plan that’s
economically competitive, with deep buy-in by land owning stakeholders, and still offering a transformative Vision for a healthy and resilient district future La Quinta residents will call home.

Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
La Quinta, CA
Client
City of La Quinta
Service Dates
2022 - 2026
Relevant Team Members
Todd Tregenza
Jonathan Linkus
Tom Hessel
Linda Congleton
104
12 Project Description
The Revitalization plan envisions the historic center of Beaumont as a re-established heart of the community – a livable destination. The revitalization plan supplements and supports the General Plan’s downtown vision with an implementation strategy for three city-led development
subareas with city-owned parcels. Each constituted
a town-square concept with new public realm, public
parking, independent restaurants, and adjacent forsale housing. The Revitalization Plan also studied three corridor street front sites ideal for mixed use (housing over retail) to infill Beaumont’s ‘main street’ as a dense walkable corridor. The GHD team also brought it’s inhouse roundabout and complete streets engineering designers to prepare a daring reconfiguration proposal
that reclaims the 5-lane 6th street corridor as a narrow center-parked roadway intended to support weekend
event closures and annual parades. Linda Congleton &
Associates' hands-on approach to interacting with locally owned small businesses integrated well with the outreach approach needed for this highly-engaged business
community. Her interviews in among two Community
Workshops meant businesses owners saw their future in
the plan proposals.

Outcome
Upon adoption, the Beaumont City council stated that the Revitalization Plan “embodied everything we aspire to
become.” A detailed analysis of mismatched development
demand (site-by-site) with recent zoning updates identified that nearly half of the opportunity sites required further code amendments. This is currently being applied to the zoning code update. In addition, the City has issued a $1M plus RFP for a preliminary design
report to detail and pre-engineer all public realm and
streetscape improvements recommended in GHD’s
Revitalization Plan.

Downtown Revitalization Plan
Beaumont, CA
Client
City of Beaumont
Service Dates
2022 - 2024
Relevant Team Members
Todd Tregenza
Jonathan Linkus
Tom Hessel
Linda Congleton
105
13 Client
City of Twentynine Palms
Service Dates
2021 - 2022
Relevant Team Members
Todd Tregenza
Jonathan Linkus
Tom Hessel
Linda Congleton
Downtown Specific Plan
Twentynine Palms, CA
Project Description
The Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan is
a comprehensive initiative aimed at revitalizing the
downtown area of Twentynine Palms, California.

The project, known as “Horizon 2045,” involves the
development of a vibrant, visitor-oriented district with streetscape upgrades, a pedestrian paseo network, and
opportunity sites for retail and housing infill development.

The plan seeks to foster economic revitalization
and reduce barriers to housing affordability through
sustainable growth, investments in safer multimodal
roadways, green spaces, and forward-thinking catalytic
projects. Community engagement was a key component,
involving in-person workshops, questionnaires, websurveys, and several rounds of review with City leadership.

In the hi-desert community of Twentynine Palms,
residents, stakeholders, and City leaders came together to re-imagine their downtown as a regional center
for livability, culture and experience. Plan proposals
center around a visitor-oriented district with streetscape upgrades, a pedestrian paseo network, and opportunity
sites for retail and housing infill development. GHD's
Urban Planning team led the project consortium, and
directly provided land use, transportation, open space, sustainability, and utility plan elements, as well as a CEQA IS/MND in-house. GHD partnered with Linda S. Congleton
& Associates for a detailed economic development
strategy. Community engagement included two inperson workshops, questionnaires to 600 community members, a Land Use Alternatives web-survey with over
200 participants, and several rounds of review with City leadership.

Outcome
The plan’s recommendations include the addition of
19,500 more GSF for commercial development, 150
additional hotel rooms, 150 dwellings, a 100% increase in downtown housing capture rate, 1,550 feet of additional pedestrian paseos, and 440 additional residents in
downtown homes. Overall, the plan aims to deliver a
“Downtown 29” that embodies a distinctly local flavor of community connections, business entrepreneurship, and
daring creativity.
106
14 Downtown Specific Plan
Twentynine Palms, CA
Additional imagery
Concept for permanent streetscape pocket parks and public shade infrastructure Concept for memorial paseo connecting downtown restraurants to civic spaces and parking 107
15 Project Description
The Downtown Redding Streets Circulation project
is a transformative initiative aimed at reintroducing
streets through the former Market Street Promenade to
enhance circulation and revitalize the downtown area.

The project, which began in 2017, includes extensive
improvements such as modifications to signal systems,
new curbs, gutters, sidewalks, curb ramps, pavers,
drainage and utility modifications, and new asphalt
pavement. The project features the design of Redding’s
first protected two-way cycle track, public outreach
efforts, and coordination with Caltrans and private
developers. GHD has been instrumental in providing
turnkey construction management and ensuring that all
aspects of the project were thoroughly analyzed and
executed.to the trail and rail mounted along the boardwalk and overlooks), a demonstration bioretention planter,
and public art installations (coordinated with local artist to include decorative fence panels and potential for
future installations). The basin planting design makes a nod to the Silicon Valley, deconstructing a circuit board layout concept using different plant materials. The area surrounding the detention basin is planted with new trees, native grasses, and a pollinator garden. Additionally, the park facilities are designed to meet ADA accessibility
standards.

Downtown Redding Revitalization Streetscapes
Redding, CA
Client
City of Redding | 777 Cypress
Avenue Redding CA 96001
Service Dates
2021 - 2023 Design
2023 - 2025 Construction
Relevant Team Members
Russel Wenham
Meg Sigler
Todd Tregenza
Brandon Tenney
Reference: Chuck Aukland,
Public Works Director | T: +1
530 225.4170 | E: caukland@
cityofredding.org
Project Outcomes
The successful implementation of the Downtown Redding
Streets Circulation project has already supported major mixed use (housing and retail) development along the
main corridor. Vibrant new community events held on
these streets now define the urban brand of Downtown
Redding, including Cool April Nights, Viva Downtown,
and the enacted public art, street tree, and public parking programs.
108
16 Project Description
The School Street Multimodal Corridor Plan is a
community-centered effort to re-imagine one of downtown Ukiah’s most active and culturally significant streets.

Building on the success of the adjacent State Street
improvements, the plan focuses on enhancing mobility and placemaking along School Street between Clay Street and Henry Street. The project strengthens connections to local businesses, civic destinations, and community gathering spaces.

Central to the Plan’s success was its outreach-driven
concept development process. Through public workshops,
walk audits, stakeholder meetings, an interactive project website, and a community survey, the team engaged
residents, business owners, and visitors early and often.

Community input directly shaped the recommended
concept, identifying priorities such as improved shade
and streetscape amenities, and balancing parking and
pedestrian needs. Insights from stakeholders helped
ensure recommendations reflect both lived experience and long-term community goals.

An interdisciplinary team of transportation engineers,
planners, urban designers, landscape architects, an
arborist, and public engagement specialists developed
recommendations that are both technically feasible and
rooted in community priorities. Early site work revealed challenges with mature street trees whose roots were
damaging sidewalks and conflicting with underground
utilities, creating growing maintenance concerns for
the City (see image below). By combining engineering
analysis with urban forestry expertise, the team crafted a phased tree replacement strategy that preserves shade
and corridor character while reducing future infrastructure conflicts. This approach, shaped through continued public and stakeholder engagement, earned community support
and enables sustainable implementation.

The resulting concept establishes a balanced multimodal vision for Ukiah’s downtown commercial corridor that
enhances walkability, boosts environmental resilience, and supports community life and economic activity—laying the groundwork for future funding and implementation.

School Street Multimodal Corridor Street
Ukiah, CA
Client
City of Ukiah
Relevant Team Members
Todd Tregenza
Jonathan Linkus
Meg Sigler
Service Dates
10/2024 - 04/2026
109
17 f Scope of Work
Downtown Twentynine Palms reimagined as a visitororiented destination in our Downtown Specific Plan 110
18 SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 - Project Kickoff & Coordination
Task 1.1 - Kick-Off Meeting & On-Location Research:

The GHD team, including team leads for community
planning, landscape architecture, transportation,
utilities/services, and market/economics will meet with City staff for an in-person kick-off meeting. Objectives of the project kick-off include scope refinement,
communication protocols, community engagement
strategy, and additional data requests.

The GHD team will use this opportunity to listen to our client and any invited stakeholders about initial thoughts and project direction. The kick-off will be part of a multiday on-site opportunity to connect with local stakeholders and interest groups that may be available during that
week.

The GHD team will perform an initial in-person site and community tour in conjunction with the kick-off. Site tour objectives are to document all aspects of existing physical conditions. The initial estimate of direct expenses for the kick-off and site-tour subtask support a two- or three-night stay to build project momentum.

Task 1.2 - Regular Client Coordination Meetings:

Regular, recurring bi-monthly (every two weeks) remote
coordination meetings will be arranged by GHD via MS
Teams (or other if the City prefers). These meetings will be a minimum of 30 minutes and will be led by the GHD
project manager. Other team leads are budgeted to attend at least half of all meetings through the course of the project as-needed. A limited number of these “check-in” meetings may be held in person in conjunction with site visits. A brief agenda will be provided to the City one day before these meetings, and a summary of action items will be provided after.

Task 1.3 - Project Management & Invoicing: This subtask provides for monthly time to review a detailed invoice with hourly timesheet backup in conjunction with a project
progress update and quality control reviews. This includes hours supporting Project Director availability to the City and our Project Accountant.

Task 2 - Existing Conditions Analysis
Task 2.1 - Data Gathering & Base Documentation: The
GHD Team will use the initial site tour to gather existing physical conditions, including vegetation, hardscape, soil, existing roads and access points, view corridors, visibility into the site from roads and I-5, and the limited adjacent urban development. Some of this information will be
based on provided digital resources from the City,
especially parcel data, topographic and site overlay data.

Base documentation will support analysis and design
project tasks. This includes site analysis and resource maps, environmental context diagrams, a scaled base
map for consistent master plan presentation in the final report and presentation boards. This includes the
preparation of a shared CAD document and GIS intake and support.

This task also serves as an opportunity to prepare a 3D base model of the site for use in diagrams, including a Sun Orientation Study, massing studies, view analysis, and
general project visualization.

Task 2.2 - Analysis of Existing Policies & Plans: The GHD Team will assemble, catalogue, and evaluate all prior
policy and planning documents to:
1) Understand environmental, code and policy
opportunities and constraints
2) Ascertain community-led vision and stakeholder
aspiration for the site
3) Avoid unnecessary re-work, or, where
appropriate, provide updated analysis, and,
4) Synthesize that spectrum of inputs into a singular
comprehensive plan solution
This work begins with the EPA Brownfield Grant
documentation and DTSC certification, and their related Land Use Covenant. In addition, the GHD team will review and incorporate initial direction from “The Landing: Mt.

Shasta Commerce Park Area Wide Plan,” which contains a
significant body of technical, demographic, cartographic, infrastructure, and narrative instruction to this master plan team. This document also contains crucial
“stakeholder listening.”
The City of Mount Shasta General Plan (and current
update), Code, Siskiyou plans, and regional economic
studies, as well as comparable documents in neighboring communities, will also be reviewed.

A key objective of this work is to understand how policies and strategies may be inhibiting development, and how a revised vision and policy outlay for this new Master Plan will advance implementation of new development.

Task 2.3 - Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions: The GHD transportation planning team will include a high level data-driven evaluation of traffic and accident data which, in turn, inform economic and safety analysis. Traffic data can be used to apply for CalTrans grants on the basis of transit-oriented, pedestrian safety, and GHG impacts –
potentially supporting early implementation. The
transportation team will expand on this initial review of transportation infrastructure and traffic conditions as a consolidated design concept emerges. This positions
them to contribute informed guidance on road
configuration – especially in a mixed-use multi-modal
development concept.
111
19 Task 2.4 - Analysis of Existing Utilities & Connections:

The GHD civil engineering team (addressing linear
water/wastewater, stormwater, and
electrical/communications) will establish a
comprehensive understanding of utility system capacity.

This is not exclusive to mains adjacent to or near the site.

System-wide utility capacity will be considered in an
analysis to serve as comparative baseline for impact
analysis based on a revised plan (consolidated from plan alternatives). This means Task 2 and Task 5 analysis of utilities will be provided in averaged flow rates per unit time – information essential to planning municipal system capacity upgrades.

Utility services inside The Landing drive the crucial
question of development phasing, financing, and the
lowest-cost to highest benefit capital infrastructure
investment.

Task 2.5 - Field Work; Competition; Area-Wide &
National Economic Trends; & Interim Memo: Conduct
an in-field review of current and planned/proposed
residential, retail, commercial (including light industrial), lodging/accommodations, recreation, and key
entertainment and “gathering spaces,” including selected regional projects that may have a direct impact on the
subject project. LSCA will focus on private sector
programmatic solutions that will generate income for the City on a long-term basis. County and national economic trends will be investigated to determine the potential
positive development potential of the site. LSCA will
prepare an interim memo summarizing our key preliminary findings and conclusions, highlighting areas of greatest development potential.

Task 2.6 - Summary Existing Conditions Report: The
GHD Team will compile existing conditions and project
background into an introductory chapter for the master
plan report. GHD will develop a list of initial master plan goals and initial strategies with respect to existing
conditions and opportunities to incorporate industry best practices in the SWOT analyses.

Task 3 - Community Engagement
Process
Task 3.1 - Engagement Strategy & Communications
Package: The Engagement Strategy is a memo
establishing messaging consistency among consultant
contributors and civic stakeholders, as well as details about workshop timing, location, agendas, and planned
interactive elements.

A “Plain Language Fact Sheet” regarding the
environmental remediation and the specific allowable
uses under the LUC will be an important flyer or placemat style handout (digital and physical print) to convey
consistent shared understanding about site opportunities and limitations. This flyer may also communicate the
differences among prior planning efforts and this one.

Task 3.2 - SWOT Analysis & Optimum Initial Strategies:

Prepare an economic development-oriented “SWOT”
analysis for The Landing on a short- and long-term basis, with an emphasis on the strategic implementation
opportunities vis-à-vis competitive communities and
major competition.

Task 3.3 - Town Hall #1 Market Conditions & Vision
Workshop: Prepare a Market Conditions analysis for
presentation, and summarize our key findings in the Town Hall #1 Vision Workshop. Discuss possible viable
development options to be considered, dependent upon
the infrastructure/utility analysis of the GHD team
members. Discuss timing, phasing and optimum
locations based on the market conditions desired by
private sector end users.

Precedents, SWOT Analysis, Initial Strategies, existing conditions. and the image boards will be presented here to measure community and stakeholder “taste” prior to
alternative concept development.

This meeting is, in-essence, an open-ended visioning
session. Community aspirations related to the role of the site for the whole of Mount Shasta need to be captured in this meeting, as well as crucial needs and concernsaddress.

Task 3.4 - Town Hall #2 - Plan Alternatives Workshop:

Up to three plan alternatives will offer community
constituents, stakeholders, and entrepreneurs
economically viable alternatives primarily differentiated by dimensions of land use mix, development types (and their related likely tenancies), circulation strategy, and public access and open space resources. Participants will be
able to draw directly on mapped alternatives to “pick
apart” and engage in the site design effort. Voting on each dimension of an alternative undependably will inform the GHD urban design efforts in the development of a
preferred and consolidated plan.

This workshop is typically the most active and most wellattended – several table activities, input and voting methods, and direct speaking opportunities will ensure
the community feels this master plan is “co created.”
Task 3.5 - Town Hall #3 - Plan Finalization Workshop:

This final workshop is an opportunity to present a singular cohesive design proposal in a way that evidences design decisions emanating from Workshop 2 input. All eleven
Site Analysis & Development Framework diagrams will
accompany an overall full color illustrative plan and basic 3D massing views.
112
20 Development phasing and time horizons are an important expectation to establish with community members in this type of presentation. Also, demographic, employment,
population, and general traffic impact advisement will
also be presented. The objective of this final workshop is ultimately to establish a collective understanding of
shared benefit relative to time and capital project costs.

Public response and input on design refinement will be
documented to be incorporated in the development of the final master plan.

Task 4 - Economic Report &
Development Strategy
Task 4.1 - Residential, Commercial & Light Industrial
Market Analysis & Demand Potential: Prepare an
analysis of demographics; competition; and market trends affecting the potential demand for residential,
retail/commercial and light industrial at the subject site.

Assess the key market trends affecting the demand for
these uses and the supportable space based on these
drivers. Assess the permanent resident demand for
retail/commercial space at the subject site, and analyze the impact of regional competition on potential new uses.

Determine the supportable units; square footage; and
types of uses based on these demand factors.

Task 4.2 - Recreational, Lodging & Tourism Market
Analysis & Demand Potential: Prepare an analysis of the regional tourism market, including overnight visitors and traveling (day) visitors and its potential spending/demand impact. Assess the impact of regional
tourism/recreational competition sites (and brands
represented). Analyze important national and regional
development and operational lodging/tourism market
trends affecting the potential demand at the subject site.

Assess recent key market trends affecting the demand for these uses. Determine supportable space based on these
demand drivers. Assess the additional retail/commercial supportable space based on tourism/visitor demand
potential at the subject site.

Task 4.3 - Preparation of Executive Summary Letter
Report & Exhibit Package: Prepare a 5-7 page Executive
Summary Letter & Exhibit Package summarizing our key
findings, conclusions and recommendations, supported
by an exhibit package.

Task 4.4 - Preparation of Final Executive Summary
Letter Report & Exhibit Package: Prepare final Executive Summary Report & Exhibit Package with discussion of
exhibits, key conclusions and recommendations,
supported by the final report exhibit package.

Task 5 - Master Plan Development &
Design Process
Task 5.1 - Precedent Studies & Image Boards: Image
boards documenting and describing successful regional
and national applicable precedents will both
communicate economically viable building types and
overall district character. The objective of this task is to ascertain:
1) Development types and development strategies
repeatable in the Mount Shasta context
2) Preview of site character and intensity ahead of
alternatives
3) Inspire this design process with “wildcard” use
concepts that unlock unforeseen site potential.

Linda Congleton’s team will provide development example prototypes for use by the design team for their image
boards and final work products.

Task 5.2 - Initial Plan & Internal Workshop for “Plan
Alternatives”: In preparation for Workshop #2, Linda
Congleton’s economics team will participate in an internal “brainstorming” workshop with the GHD design team to
create development master plan alternatives; marketdriven optimum site locations; and sizing criteria of real estate uses. The GHD design team will refine three (3)
“Plan Alternatives” with clear resolution to:
- Land Use Areas & Development Types
- Circulation & Roadway Networks
- Open Space & Civic/Recreation Networks
Each Plan Alternative Land Use strategy will be
diagrammed according to:
- Affordable/Work Force Housing Opportunities
- Retail Zones
- Residential Areas
- Commercial Districts
- Civic and Community Uses
- Recreational and Entertainment Areas
- Public Gathering and Open Space Areas
As Initial Concepts, they will be communicated with very simple plan views with overlay diagramming, and simple
“block” massing. High level “back of envelope” General
Area Calculations (Yields) will be provided with each
Alternative to comparatively describe their economic and cultural potential.

Task 5.3 - Revised Plan & Supporting Diagrams -
"Consensus Plan": A revised consensus plan will be
generated from the varied inputs of Workshop 2,
consolidating input on land use, circulation, and open
space – as well as overall character. This Consensus Plan will more precisely propose buildings, heights,
development type, public realm and roadway network,
and will be chiefly communicated in an overall illustrative plan view. A General Area Calculation or “Yield Summary Table” will accompany the design for comparison to the
113
21 economic demand modeling. This data is crucial input for utility capacity and impact analysis in Task 5.4.

A major addition to the design critical path at Task 5.3 is the introduction of a comprehensive site landscape
concept for public realm and private realm. Public realm landscapes are part of the roadway network and Open
Space & Recreation Networks. This landscape
architecture proposal will be initial, conceptual in nature, and will include a high level plant/tree palette.

This Consensus Plan is presented at Workshop 3 for input in anticipation of the Finalized Plan and “Design Package.” Task 5.4 - Finalized Plan & Supporting Diagrams -
"Design Package": The finalized Design Package is the
comprehensive suite of finished drawings, models, and
diagrams incorporating comments from Workshop 3. Key
Site Analysis & Development Framework elements at this
stage will include:
- Full Color, Shaded, Illustrative Plan
- Developable Area Diagram
- Sun Orientation Study
- External Vehicular Access Plan
- Internal Circulation and Arrival Plan
- Pedestrian Circulation Plan
- Open Space vs. Developable Area Plan
- Conceptual Land Use Plan (land use colored
diagram with building types)
- Site Sections (2 total)
- Massing and Block Diagrams (3 total 3D views)
- Building Height Diagrams (2 total 2D elevation
views, including existing tree heights)
- Parking Strategy Diagram (with parking capacity
labels)
The final Design Package will include one final detailed square footage table with retail bay, dwelling unit, and parking demand counts. Square footage areas will be in
Gross Floor Area.

A key addition to the design critical path at Task 5.4 is final analysis of utility impacts based on final land uses and their general gross square footage, dwelling unit count, and extrapolated occupancy.

The GHD design team will prepare two (2) low-aerial 3D
visualizations in a digital watercolor style, prepared byhand on iPad tablets by our in-house architecture and urban design team (based in Irvine and Tustin).

Task 6 - Final Master Plan &
Implementation Strategy
Task 6.1 - Major Draft Master Plan - 75% Plan Report: A substantially complete (75% of pages and/or content)
draft Master Plan document will be assembled. Compiling project background, plans to-date, existing conditions
report, economic summary chapter, community
engagement summary chapter, and a Development Plan
and Framework chapter encompassing all diagrams, and
project depictions refined for Task 5.4.

A major addition to this Plan Report draft effort is the inclusion of an implementation or “action plan” chapter which clarifies phasing and more precise capital
improvement tasks than are provided in the Area Wide
Plan from 2015.

This Major Draft Master Plan will be submitted to the City of Mount Shasta for administrative review. Comments at
this stage are a final chance for Client and the GHD/LSCA Team to perform substantive edits – including design,
narrative, and recommendations.

Task 6.2 - Final Master Plan - 100% Plan Report: After the initial round of review of the 75% Major Draft Master Plan, remaining content and edits will be incorporated to
assemble a complete master plan document. The GHD
team intends this document to be “presumed complete”
project, but will gather a final round of revisions to refine the master plan in preparation for the Adoption Hearings.

The GHD team understands that revisions to this 100%
Draft will need to be schedule for completion two to three weeks before the first Adoption Hearing: The Special
Planning Commission Public hearing anticipated to be
held July 28th.

Task 6.3 - Final Revisions & Adoption Hearings: GHD will present a PDF or slide version of the completed 100%
Final Master Plan Report at The Special Planning
Commission Public Hearing and two consecutive Council
Public Hearings on August 10th and 24th, respectively. The GHD team has set aside enough direct expense allotment
for one in-person attendance at each of these meetings
through a one-night stay. These will be crucial
opportunities to collaborate on final document edits and refinements in the pursuit of unanimous adoption.

Additional In-Person Meetings &
Presentations (T&E)
Add-On One-Day Presentation: Should the City request
any additional in-person presentations/meetings, the GHD Team is available to accommodate this request on a fixed fee basis for each presentation/meeting.

Add-On Zoom Call Presentation/Meeting: Should the
City request any Zoom call presentation/meetings beyond 30-minute bi-weekly coordination meetings, the LSCA
economics team is available to accommodate this
request on a fixed fee basis.
114
22 f Fee Proposal
& Workplan
Collaborative workshop in Bridgeville California, where we prepared their community center master plan.
115
23 116
24 f Resumes
& References
Bridgeville Community Center conceptual master plan
broad large site planning together with architecture
117
25 Jonathan Linkus | Urban Planning + Communities Technical Leader for the Americas T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Jonathan Linkus AICP, LEED AP
Urban Planning + Communities Technical Leader
for the Americas
Location
Irvine, CA
Experience
16 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2011 – BArch, Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008 – American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #30431 – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), US Green Council Building Key technical skills
– Community Master Planning Leadership
– Public & Private Planning, Urban Design & Outreach
– Site Design and Development Programming
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– US Green Building Council
– Urban Land Institute
Relevant experience summary
Jonathan Linkus is GHD’s urban design + planning service lead in the Americas and US West Technical Director.

His 16 years delivering public and private projects are based on thoughtful client and stakeholder relationships and integrated thinking across urban scales. His work pioneering community uplift strategies has garnered 10 regional, state, and national awards - all as lead planner or project manager. Project types include university plans (longrange development plans), mixed-use, specific plans, community parks, sports districts, coastal resiliency, and airport-connected master plans.

Downtown + Transit-Oriented
La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA | 2022-2025
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
comprehensive master plan for infill mixed-use
development for a liveable and vibrant heart for the
community along a 2.0-mile retail corridor. | 450 Acres Beaumont Downtown Revitalization Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Beaumont | Beaumont, CA | 2022-2024
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for
overlay plan and economic strategy coordinating
detailed urban designs with guidelines and economically catalyzing capital improvement projects. | 506 Acres
Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Twentynine Palms | Twentynine Palms, CA |
2021-2022
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for long
range comprehensive master plan for economic
revitalization of a liveable, walkable, and vibrant heart of the community; with two public workshops and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). | 210 Acres
Arcata General Plan and Gateway Overlay
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of Arcata | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
conceptual housing and mixed-use development
planning for opportunity sites within the Gateway
Overlay District. | 2,500 Dwelling Units, 52 Acres
118
26 Jonathan Linkus | Urban Planning + Communities Technical Leader for the Americas T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Campus + Workplace Districts
University of Hawaiʻi – West Oʻahu Long Range
Development Plan*
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
University of Hawaii | Kapolei, HI | 2017-2018
Developed conceptual site plan options and preferred
space need analysis, multi-day workshop, public
outreach for Hawaii’s fastest growing four-year
university. | 500 Acres, 20,000 Full-Time Equivalent
(FTE) Students
Amazon HQ2 Nevada*
Project Manager, Lead Planner
Las Vegas Economic and Urban Development
Department | Las Vegas, NV | 2017-2018
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for citysponsored conceptual design entry for new 50,000- employee Amazon headquarters across three downtown
sites. | 8.07M GSF, 70 Acres
California State University - San Bernardino +
Palm Desert Campus Master Plan*
Co-Project Manager, Lead Planner
California State University - San Bernardino | San
Bernardino, CA | 2015-2017
Directed a multi-disciplinary long range integrated
master plan effort, developed plan concepts and
outreach material for six workshops. | 591 Acres, 25,000 FTE Students
Peachtree Corners Innovation Hub Master Plan*
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Peachtree Corners | Peachtree Corners, GA |
2017
Developed two mixed-use gateway districts, prepared
adaptive reuse/infill and transit framework as land use subconsultant. | 8.27M GSF, 950-Acre Study Area
Open Space + Public Realm
Perez Community Park
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
Orange County Public Works | Costa Mesa, CA |
2018-2020
Integrated solution for a public realm that combines
stormwater bioretention, streetscape accessibility, and a community park with tot-lot. | 5K GSF
Imola Corridor Complete Street Masterplan
Team Planner, Urban Designer
City of Napa | Napa, CA | 2019
Responsible for public outreach visioning guidance and
event participation, conceptual streetscape design and
visualization, and mobility hub. | 2.5-Mile Segment
San Francisco Mission Waterfront Adaptation*
Lead Planner
San Francisco Planning & Urban Research
Association | San Francisco, CA | 2015-2016
Provided award-winning concepts for waterfront urban
interface that integrates open space and future climate change adaptation. | 135-Acre Study Area
Awards
• Outstanding Initiative | Peachtree Corners Innovation Hub Master Plan | American Planning Association -
GA Chapter | September 2018*
• Best Practices Award of Excellence | Mission Creek
Sea Level Rise Adaptation Study | American Planning
Association - CA Chapter | September 2017*
• Innovation in Green Community Planning Award of
Excellence | Mission Creek Sea Level Rise
Adaptation Study | American Planning Association –
Northern CA Chapter | June 2017*
• Best Practices Merit Award | 2016 CSUSB Palm
Desert Campus Master Plan | American Planning
Association – Inland Empire Section | April 2017*
• Urban Design Award | 2016 CSUSB Palm Desert
Campus Master Plan | American Planning Association
– Inland Empire Section | April 2017*
• National Planning Award 2016: Municipality
• Ekurhuleni Aerotropolis Master Plan | South Africa
Planning Institute (SAPI) | July 2016*
• National Planning Award 2016: Professional
• Ekurhuleni Aerotropolis Master Plan | SAPI | July
2016*
• Outstanding Planning Award for a Plan | Memphis
Aerotropolis Airport City Master Plan | American
Planning Association – TN Chapter | August 2014*
* = Work performed with previous employer
Career history
2018 - present Planning + Urban Design, GHD,
Project Planner
2011 - 2018 Planning + Urban Design,
CallisonRTKL Inc., Associate
2008 LPA Inc., K-12 Education
2006 - 2010 Luxury Residential Design,
Mercedes de La Garza, Architect
Studio
119
Jonathan Linkus | SELECTED WORKS
T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Jonathan Linkus AICP, LEED AP
Location
Irvine, CA
Experience
16 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2011 – BArch, Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008 – American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #30431 – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), US Green Council Building Key technical skills
– Community Master Planning Leadership
– Public & Private Planning, Urban Design & Outreach
– Site Design and Development Programming
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– US Green Building Council
– Urban Land Institute
Relevant experience summary
Jonathan Linkus is GHD’s urban design + planning service lead in the Americas and US West Technical Director.

His 16 years delivering public and private projects are based on thoughtful client and stakeholder relationships and integrated thinking across urban scales. His work pioneering community uplift strategies has garnered 10 regional, state, and national awards - all as lead planner or project manager. Project types include university plans (longrange development plans), mixed-use, specific plans, community parks, sports districts, coastal resiliency, and airport-connected master plans.

Mixed-Use + Transit-Oriented
La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA | 2022-2026
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
comprehensive master plan for infill mixed-use
development for a liveable and vibrant heart for the
community along a 2.0-mile retail corridor. | 450 Acres Beaumont Downtown Revitalization Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Beaumont | Beaumont, CA | 2022-2024
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for
overlay plan and economic strategy coordinating
detailed urban designs with guidelines and economically catalyzing capital improvement projects. | 506 Acres
Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Twentynine Palms | Twentynine Palms, CA |
2021-2022
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for long
range comprehensive master plan for economic
revitalization of a liveable, walkable, and vibrant heart of the community; with two public workshops and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). | 210 Acres
Arcata General Plan and Gateway Overlay
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of Arcata | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
conceptual housing and mixed-use development
planning for opportunity sites within the Gateway
Overlay District. | 2,500 Dwelling Units, 52 Acres
Selected Works
Jonathan Linkus | SELECTED WORKS
T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Jonathan Linkus AICP, LEED AP
Location
Irvine, CA
Experience
16 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2011 – BArch, Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008 – American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #30431 – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), US Green Council Building Key technical skills
– Community Master Planning Leadership
– Public & Private Planning, Urban Design & Outreach
– Site Design and Development Programming
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– US Green Building Council
– Urban Land Institute
Relevant experience summary
Jonathan Linkus is GHD’s urban design + planning service lead in the Americas and US West Technical Director.

His 16 years delivering public and private projects are based on thoughtful client and stakeholder relationships and integrated thinking across urban scales. His work pioneering community uplift strategies has garnered 10 regional, state, and national awards - all as lead planner or project manager. Project types include university plans (longrange development plans), mixed-use, specific plans, community parks, sports districts, coastal resiliency, and airport-connected master plans.

Mixed-Use + Transit-Oriented
La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA | 2022-2026
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
comprehensive master plan for infill mixed-use
development for a liveable and vibrant heart for the
community along a 2.0-mile retail corridor. | 450 Acres Beaumont Downtown Revitalization Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Beaumont | Beaumont, CA | 2022-2024
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for
overlay plan and economic strategy coordinating
detailed urban designs with guidelines and economically catalyzing capital improvement projects. | 506 Acres
Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Twentynine Palms | Twentynine Palms, CA |
2021-2022
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for long
range comprehensive master plan for economic
revitalization of a liveable, walkable, and vibrant heart of the community; with two public workshops and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). | 210 Acres
Arcata General Plan and Gateway Overlay
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of Arcata | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
conceptual housing and mixed-use development
planning for opportunity sites within the Gateway
Overlay District. | 2,500 Dwelling Units, 52 Acres
Selected Works
Jonathan Linkus | SELECTED WORKS
T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Jonathan Linkus AICP, LEED AP
Location
Irvine, CA
Experience
16 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2011 – BArch, Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008 – American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #30431 – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), US Green Council Building Key technical skills
– Community Master Planning Leadership
– Public & Private Planning, Urban Design & Outreach
– Site Design and Development Programming
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– US Green Building Council
– Urban Land Institute
Relevant experience summary
Jonathan Linkus is GHD’s urban design + planning service lead in the Americas and US West Technical Director.

His 16 years delivering public and private projects are based on thoughtful client and stakeholder relationships and integrated thinking across urban scales. His work pioneering community uplift strategies has garnered 10 regional, state, and national awards - all as lead planner or project manager. Project types include university plans (longrange development plans), mixed-use, specific plans, community parks, sports districts, coastal resiliency, and airport-connected master plans.

Mixed-Use + Transit-Oriented
La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA | 2022-2026
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
comprehensive master plan for infill mixed-use
development for a liveable and vibrant heart for the
community along a 2.0-mile retail corridor. | 450 Acres Beaumont Downtown Revitalization Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Beaumont | Beaumont, CA | 2022-2024
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for
overlay plan and economic strategy coordinating
detailed urban designs with guidelines and economically catalyzing capital improvement projects. | 506 Acres
Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Twentynine Palms | Twentynine Palms, CA |
2021-2022
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for long
range comprehensive master plan for economic
revitalization of a liveable, walkable, and vibrant heart of the community; with two public workshops and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). | 210 Acres
Arcata General Plan and Gateway Overlay
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of Arcata | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
conceptual housing and mixed-use development
planning for opportunity sites within the Gateway
Overlay District. | 2,500 Dwelling Units, 52 Acres
Selected Works
Peachtree Corners Innovation Hub Master Plan | Peachtree Corners, GA | 2016-2018 Work completed with prior employment*
Work completed with prior employment*
Arcata Gateway District General Plan Update | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022 UH West Oʻahu Long Range Development Plan | Kapolei, HI | 2017-2018 120
Jonathan Linkus | SELECTED WORKS
T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Jonathan Linkus AICP, LEED AP
Location
Irvine, CA
Experience
16 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2011 – BArch, Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008 – American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #30431 – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), US Green Council Building Key technical skills
– Community Master Planning Leadership
– Public & Private Planning, Urban Design & Outreach
– Site Design and Development Programming
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– US Green Building Council
– Urban Land Institute
Relevant experience summary
Jonathan Linkus is GHD’s urban design + planning service lead in the Americas and US West Technical Director.

His 16 years delivering public and private projects are based on thoughtful client and stakeholder relationships and integrated thinking across urban scales. His work pioneering community uplift strategies has garnered 10 regional, state, and national awards - all as lead planner or project manager. Project types include university plans (longrange development plans), mixed-use, specific plans, community parks, sports districts, coastal resiliency, and airport-connected master plans.

Mixed-Use + Transit-Oriented
La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA | 2022-2026
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
comprehensive master plan for infill mixed-use
development for a liveable and vibrant heart for the
community along a 2.0-mile retail corridor. | 450 Acres Beaumont Downtown Revitalization Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Beaumont | Beaumont, CA | 2022-2024
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for
overlay plan and economic strategy coordinating
detailed urban designs with guidelines and economically catalyzing capital improvement projects. | 506 Acres
Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Twentynine Palms | Twentynine Palms, CA |
2021-2022
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for long
range comprehensive master plan for economic
revitalization of a liveable, walkable, and vibrant heart of the community; with two public workshops and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). | 210 Acres
Arcata General Plan and Gateway Overlay
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of Arcata | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
conceptual housing and mixed-use development
planning for opportunity sites within the Gateway
Overlay District. | 2,500 Dwelling Units, 52 Acres
Selected Works
Jonathan Linkus | SELECTED WORKS
T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Jonathan Linkus AICP, LEED AP
Location
Irvine, CA
Experience
16 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2011 – BArch, Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008 – American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #30431 – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), US Green Council Building Key technical skills
– Community Master Planning Leadership
– Public & Private Planning, Urban Design & Outreach
– Site Design and Development Programming
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– US Green Building Council
– Urban Land Institute
Relevant experience summary
Jonathan Linkus is GHD’s urban design + planning service lead in the Americas and US West Technical Director.

His 16 years delivering public and private projects are based on thoughtful client and stakeholder relationships and integrated thinking across urban scales. His work pioneering community uplift strategies has garnered 10 regional, state, and national awards - all as lead planner or project manager. Project types include university plans (longrange development plans), mixed-use, specific plans, community parks, sports districts, coastal resiliency, and airport-connected master plans.

Mixed-Use + Transit-Oriented
La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA | 2022-2026
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
comprehensive master plan for infill mixed-use
development for a liveable and vibrant heart for the
community along a 2.0-mile retail corridor. | 450 Acres Beaumont Downtown Revitalization Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Beaumont | Beaumont, CA | 2022-2024
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for
overlay plan and economic strategy coordinating
detailed urban designs with guidelines and economically catalyzing capital improvement projects. | 506 Acres
Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Twentynine Palms | Twentynine Palms, CA |
2021-2022
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for long
range comprehensive master plan for economic
revitalization of a liveable, walkable, and vibrant heart of the community; with two public workshops and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). | 210 Acres
Arcata General Plan and Gateway Overlay
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of Arcata | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
conceptual housing and mixed-use development
planning for opportunity sites within the Gateway
Overlay District. | 2,500 Dwelling Units, 52 Acres
Selected Works
Jonathan Linkus | SELECTED WORKS
T 949.585.5265 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Jonathan Linkus AICP, LEED AP
Location
Irvine, CA
Experience
16 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– MAUD, Architecture in Urban Design, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 2011 – BArch, Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2008 – American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) #30431 – Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional (LEED AP), US Green Council Building Key technical skills
– Community Master Planning Leadership
– Public & Private Planning, Urban Design & Outreach
– Site Design and Development Programming
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– US Green Building Council
– Urban Land Institute
Relevant experience summary
Jonathan Linkus is GHD’s urban design + planning service lead in the Americas and US West Technical Director.

His 16 years delivering public and private projects are based on thoughtful client and stakeholder relationships and integrated thinking across urban scales. His work pioneering community uplift strategies has garnered 10 regional, state, and national awards - all as lead planner or project manager. Project types include university plans (longrange development plans), mixed-use, specific plans, community parks, sports districts, coastal resiliency, and airport-connected master plans.

Mixed-Use + Transit-Oriented
La Quinta Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA | 2022-2026
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
comprehensive master plan for infill mixed-use
development for a liveable and vibrant heart for the
community along a 2.0-mile retail corridor. | 450 Acres Beaumont Downtown Revitalization Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Beaumont | Beaumont, CA | 2022-2024
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for
overlay plan and economic strategy coordinating
detailed urban designs with guidelines and economically catalyzing capital improvement projects. | 506 Acres
Twentynine Palms Downtown Specific Plan
Project Manager, Lead Planner
City of Twentynine Palms | Twentynine Palms, CA |
2021-2022
Served as Project Manager and Lead Planner for long
range comprehensive master plan for economic
revitalization of a liveable, walkable, and vibrant heart of the community; with two public workshops and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). | 210 Acres
Arcata General Plan and Gateway Overlay
Lead Planner, Urban Designer
City of Arcata | Arcata, CA | 2021-2022
Served as Lead Planner and Urban Designer for
conceptual housing and mixed-use development
planning for opportunity sites within the Gateway
Overlay District. | 2,500 Dwelling Units, 52 Acres
Selected Works
CSUSB Campus Master Plan | San Bernardino, CA | 2015-2017 Amazon HQ2 Nevada | Las Vegas, NV | 2017-2018
Perez Community Park | Costa Mesa, CA | 2018-2020
Work completed with prior employment*
Work completed with prior employment*
121
29 Todd Tregenza | Senior Transportation Planner
T 916.245.4216 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Todd Tregenza AICP
Senior Transportation Planner
Location
Sacramento, CA
Experience
18 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– BS, Community and Regional Development, University of California, Davis, CA, 2007 – American Institute of Certified Planners #29678
Key technical skills
– Multimodal Performance and Safety Analyses
– Transportation Programming and Funding Strategies
– Cost-Benefit Analyses and Grant Application Support
– Transportation Modeling and Vehicle Miles Traveled
(VMT) Guidelines
Memberships
– American Planning Association
– Young Professionals in Transportation
Relevant experience summary
Todd Tregenza has 18 years of experience in transportation planning projects, assisting dozens of agencies throughout central and northern California in short- and long-range programming, including the development of travel demand models, general plan circulation elements, specific and master plans, corridor studies, capital improvement programs, nexus and fee studies, transportation operational analyses, and impact analyses. This experience spans public and private sectors, extending into on-call contracts and arrangements with municipalities, where Todd prepares transportation studies and grant applications, performing peer reviews of impact studies and developing California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) impact analyses for development projects of all sizes.

Vineyard Drive Corridor Study
Project Director
County of San Luis Obispo | San Luis Obispo
County, CA
Served as Project Director in preparing a multimodal
corridor study in the Templeton community of San Luis
Obispo. Supported the Project Manager in navigating
project concept development and stakeholder / public
engagement to reach consensus. Provided review and
quality assurance on deliverables, including reports,
traffic operations analyses, travel demand forecasting, active transportation and traffic calming elements, and conceptual engineering.

Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan
Project Manager
City of La Quinta | La Quinta, CA
Served as overall Project Manager for a multidisciplinary effort that started as a transportation corridor plan and evolved along with client needs to a full Specific Plan.

Managed the preparation of corridor improvements to
implement a precedent study vision, including the
addition of multimodal elements, in particular those that reduce the effect of Highway 111 as a mobility barrier.

Oversaw preparation of the updated Specific Plan and
Development Code Update and currently managing the
preparation of a tangential Adams Street corridor plan.

City of Ukiah General Plan Update
Project Manager
Mintier Harnish | Arcata, CA
Oversaw preparation of the Circulation Element update
and transportation analysis under General Plan policy
and under CEQA, consistent with SB 743. Developed
unique GIS-based model (Place Mix) to estimate VMT
impacts of land use plan. This model builds on the one
developed for Arcata by adding a bike shed analysis
along the City’s low-stress bike network in addition to the walkable 0.25-mile walk shed in the original model.

City of Fortuna Mill District Specific Plan
Project Manager
Planwest | Fortuna, CA
A GHD Principal
122
30 Todd Tregenza | Senior Transportation Planner
T 916.245.4216 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Overseeing preparation of the transportation analysis for the proposed Mill District Specific Plan, using the unique GIS-based model (Place Mix) to estimate VMT impacts
of alternative land use plans relative to existing land use patterns and proposed General Plan land use buildout.

Model outputs are being used to refine the land use plan and reduce potential transportation impacts in the City.

Chester State Route (SR) 36 Main Street
Connectivity Plan
Project Manager
Plumas County Transportation Commission |
Chester, CA
Managed preparation of multimodal transportation
improvement plan for SR 36 through the community of
Chester in Plumas County. Oversaw robust community
engagement effort to energize the public and gain
consensus on goals for the corridor. The plan includes
rich visualizations of the preferred concept, which
recommends a four- to three-lane road diet, and new
mid-block and intersection pedestrian crossings to
minimize barriers between residential neighborhoods
and community destinations like schools, parks, and
libraries. Worked with Caltrans to develop 30% design
concepts for the corridor aiming for implementation
through upcoming State Highway Operation and
Protection Program (SHOPP) and Active Transportation
Plan (ATP) grant program.

Imola Corridor Complete Streets Improvement
Plan
Project Manager
Napa Valley Transportation Authority | Napa, CA
Managed the development of a 3.5-mile multimodal
complete streets plan for Imola Avenue in the City and
County of Napa. The plan primarily addressed safety
improvements for all road users and improved
pedestrian and bicyclist mobility. Coordinated plan
development with agency and community stakeholders
to ensure a community-driven process, then prioritized
and programmed improvements according to various
measures of effectiveness, such as cost-benefit,
constructability, and environmental stewardship.

San Andreas SR 49 Southern Gateway
Commercial Corridor Study
Project Manager
Calaveras Council of Governments | San Andreas,
CA
Assisted with the corridor study including bicycle and
pedestrian facilities to close network gaps and provide safe crossings, intersection signalizations and potential roundabout locations, and a new multimodal network to
connect growth areas to existing neighborhoods and
amenities. Stakeholder outreach included property
ownership groups at the southern gateway area, where
market-based future land use alternatives were
developed using allowable use and realist absorption
rates.

Valley Springs Town Center Connectivity Plan
Project Manager
Calaveras Council of Governments | Valley Springs,
CA
Managed the development of a community-driven
multimodal complete streets plan for the “Town Center”
area within Calaveras County, with a focus on
multimodal and school safety. Coordinated plan
development with community stakeholders to ensure
community “buy-in” on recommendations and ensured
support from all public agency partners, including
Caltrans, Calaveras County, and Calaveras Council of
Governments. Assessed existing conditions for bicycle,
pedestrian, transit, and auto users, including intersection operations, multimodal traffic stress and safety, and
accessibility and connectivity. Developed
implementable, cost-effective grant-eligible, prioritized infrastructure recommendations for plan.
123
31 Russ Wenham | Project Director/Senior Technical Director T 530.338.3179 | M 530.953.6486 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com Russ Wenham PE, TE, PTOE, QSD/P
Project Director/Senior Technical Director
Location
Redding, CA
Experience
40 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico, CA, 1984 – Graduate Studies, Water Resources & Urban Planning, California State University, Sacramento, CA, 1984 – Civil Engineer, CA #43162, WA #55280, AZ #78010
– Traffic Engineer, CA #2494
– Professional Traffic Operations Engineer, CA #2533
– Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer/Practitioner – Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Pilot #4695320, Federal Aviation Administration Key technical skills
– Project and Construction Management
– Roundabout Planning and Design
– Traffic Impact Studies
– Traffic Management Plans
– Transportation Planning
– Active Transportation
– Land Development Planning, Entitlement and Design
Memberships
– American Society of Civil Engineers
– American Public Works Association
– California State University Chico, Professional
Advisory Board Civil Engineering Department
– Institute of Transportation Engineers
Relevant experience summary
Russ Wenham has over 39 years of experience designing and managing the delivery of complex engineering projects. He has successfully managed hundreds of projects involving developers and local, state, and federal agencies, including plans, specifications, estimates, traffic management plans, stage construction plans, and turnkey construction management and inspection services. Additionally, Russ is experienced with managing agency approvals and environmental requirements. He brings a unique knowledge of government policies and procedures, having served as a Caltrans Deputy District Director, Caltrans policy and standards specialist, and a department head in a small City.

California Street Bikeway
Project Director
City of Redding | Redding, CA | 2024 | $4 million
Managed the planning and design for a two-way cycle
track on a portion of city street and a portion of state highway. Providing quality control for traffic signal,
drainage, sidewalk, access ramps, signing, and
pavement delineation modifications. Construction began
in 2024.

Shasta Dam Boulevard Complete Streets
Project Director
City of Shasta Lake | Shasta Lake, CA | $2 million
Managing the planning and design for a complete
streets project on State Highway 151 (aka Shasta Dam
Boulevard) in the City of Shasta Lake. Providing quality control for protected bike lanes, transit stops, medians, high-visibility crosswalks, and other complete streets
amenities. Construction is planned for year 2025.
124
32 Russ Wenham | Project Director/Senior Technical Director T 530.338.3179 | M 530.953.6486 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com Victor Avenue Corridor Phasing Plan
Project Manager
City of Redding | Redding, CA
Managed the preparation of a multimodal corridor
master plan for a 1.5-mile arterial street corridor.

Managed all cost estimating, alternatives analysis,
preliminary design, and report preparation. Coordinated with agency staff and stakeholders. Managed
preparation of materials and logistics for a community
outreach meeting.

SR 299 Corridor Plan*
Project Manager
Caltrans | Shasta County, CA; Trinity County, CA;
Humboldt County, CA
Managed the preparation of a 20-year capital
improvement plan for a 140-mile section of SR 299 from
Arcata to Redding. Coordinated the identification of all proposed projects, preliminary designs, cost estimating, environmental impact assessments, right of way impact
assessments, and benefits identification. Managed the
preparation of a final report that was approved by three counties and two Caltrans districts. Performed when
employed by Caltrans.

Downtown Redding Community-Based
Transportation Master Plan
Project Manager
City of Redding | Redding, CA
Managed the preparation of a new downtown
transportation plan for the City of Redding. Coordinated the identification of all proposed improvements,
alternatives analysis, preliminary designs, cost
estimating, benefits identification, and selection of the final elements of the plan. Managed the community,
stakeholder, and agency outreach including two formal
public outreach meetings, a presentation to the City’s
Planning Commission, and a final presentation to the
City Council.

SR 299/Churn Creek Road/Hawley Road
Roundabout Interchange
Project Manager
Bethel Church | Redding, CA | $8 million
Managing the traffic modelling, planning, right of way
engineering, alternatives analysis, utility design, and Caltrans coordination. Coordinating the selection of
bicycle and pedestrian features, aesthetics, complete
street items, environmental impacts, and detailed
features. Construction was completed in 2020 for phase
1 improvements at one of the three intersections. Phase 2, the double roundabouts, are currently planned for
construction in year 2026.

Churn Creek Road/Rancho Road/Victor Road
Roundabout Intersection
Project Manager
City of Redding | Redding, CA | $5 million
Managed the planning and design for a single-lane
modern roundabout that will replace two stop-controlled intersections. Coordinating the preparation of
alternatives analysis, cost estimates, utility impact
determinations, environmental impacts, and detailed
features.

Shasta View Drive/Old Alturas Road
Roundabout
Project Manager, Project Engineer
McConnell Foundation | Redding, CA | $1.3 million
Managed traffic modelling, planning, public outreach,
right of way engineering, and design. Designed
roundabout to minimize right of way impacts while
replacing an all-way stop intersection with a modern
roundabout. Made over a dozen presentations to
stakeholders and decision makers to secure project
approvals. The presentations were made to police and
fire departments, bicycle groups, Rotary clubs, and City Council members. Designed aesthetic features and
coordinated drought-tolerant landscaping designs.

Successfully constructed with a construction cost of $1.3 million.

SR 299/Old Oregon Trail Traffic Signals
Principal-in-Charge
Bethel Church | Redding, CA | $3.5 million
Managed the planning and design for the signalization of two intersections. Coordinated the preparation of
alternatives analysis, cost estimates, utility impact
determinations, environmental approvals, and detailed
features. The project is currently approved with
construction planned for 2027.

Site Development Entitlement
The Peaks Residential Subdivision
Project Manager
K2 Development Company | Redding, CA | $20
million (est.)
Serving as the client’s lead consultant for a 114-acre
residential subdivision. Coordinating all preliminary
planning and engineering, environmental technical
studies, land surveying, preliminary designs, and cost
estimating. Managing approvals through tentative map
and CEQA approval through the City of Redding. Civil
design, permitting, landscape architecture, park design and final construction documents are under
development. Construction is anticipated to commence
in 2025.
125
33 Meg Sigler | Project Manager
T 530.691.5790 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Meg Sigler PE
Project Manager
Location
Redding, CA
Experience
12 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico, CA, 2013 – Civil Engineer, CA #88235
Key technical skills
– Conceptual Design and Planning
– Preparation of Contract Documents
– Construction Design Support
– Project Management
– Utility Coordination and Cost Estimating
Memberships
– Society of Women Engineers
Relevant experience summary
Meghan (Meg) Sigler is a project manager in GHD’s Redding office. She specializes in transportation and site civil engineering projects ranging from conceptual design to completed Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) packages and construction design support. Her primary responsibilities include project management, PS&E preparation, design, utility coordination and cost estimating. Meg has worked on numerous projects including roadway widening, road rehabilitation, roundabouts, drainage and utility improvements, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) facilities, bicycle facilities, traffic signal modification, multimodal corridor master plans, alternatives analyses, providing coordination with agency staff and stakeholders and assisting with community outreach meetings. She has eight years of experience working both as a consultant and with city and county government agencies.

Bethel Church Collyer Drive Campus
Project Engineer
Bethel Church of Redding | Redding, CA
Prepared the preliminary designs and cost estimates for site and off-site improvements to a 36-acre campus
development.

Dignity Mercy Medical Center North State
Pavilion
Project Engineer
Dignity Health, Mercy Medical Center Redding |
Redding, CA
Prepared the preliminary designs needed for a 10-acre
medical campus located adjacent to the Sacramento
River in Redding.

Churn Creek Marketplace Shopping Center
Project Engineer
California Gold Development Corporation | Redding,
CA
Prepared the site design for a new 20-acre shopping
center. Coordinated with adjacent property owners
regarding the various property agreements and with
utility companies regarding utility relocations and
modifications. The use permit was obtained in 2016, and construction commenced in 2017.

SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan
Project Engineer
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency | Redding/
Anderson, CA
Prepared a multimodal corridor master plan along SR
273 within the City of Anderson and Redding. Developed
the cost estimates, alternatives analysis, and preliminary 126
34 Meg Sigler | Project Manager
T 530.691.5790 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
designs. Coordinated with agency staff and
stakeholders, organized, and prepared materials and
logistics for a community outreach meeting.

Victor Avenue Corridor Phasing Plan
Project Engineer
City of Redding | Redding, CA
Prepared a multimodal corridor master plan for a 1.5-
mile arterial street corridor within the City of Redding.

Developed the cost estimates, alternatives analysis, and preliminary designs. Coordinated with agency staff and
stakeholders, organized, and prepared materials and
logistics for a community outreach meeting.

Downtown Redding Community-Based
Transportation Master Plan
Project Engineer
City of Redding | Redding, CA
Assisted with the preparation of a new downtown
transportation master plan for the City of Redding.

Created the exhibits for the public outreach meetings, a presentation to the City’s Planning Commission, and the final presentation to the City Council.

California Street Bikeway
Project Manager
City of Redding | Redding, CA
Managed the preparation of PS&E to upgrade
pedestrian facilities and provide a separated two-way
bikeway in the heart of downtown, which will tie into
Redding’s bike path network. The project is currently in construction.

Shasta Dam Boulevard Complete Streets
Project
Project Manager
Shasta Lake City | Shasta Lake, CA
Managed the preparation of PS&E to upgrade
pedestrian facilities, install pedestrian scale lighting, landscaping and provide Class IV bike lanes along State Route 151 (Shasta Dam Boulevard) in the center of
Shasta Lake City.
127
35 Brandon Tenney | Project Manager
T 530.691.5781 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Brandon Tenney PE, QSD/P
Project Manager
Location
Redding, CA
Experience
20 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– BS, Civil Engineering, California State University, Chico, CA, 2007 – Civil Engineer, CA #83928
– Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer/Practitioner, CA #83928 Key technical skills
– Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E)
– Construction Management and Inspection Services
– Local, State, and Federally Funded Projects
Memberships
– N/A
Relevant experience summary
Brandon Tenney has over 20 years of experience designing and managing the delivery of engineering projects. He has led nearly every aspect of engineering project delivery - from the planning phase, to surveying, design, PS&E, construction management, and inspection services. Additionally, Brandon is experienced with all types of projects, both privately funded and local, state, and federally funded projects. His experience includes PS&E preparation, drainage and utility plans, complex traffic management and stage construction plans, profiles and super elevations, guard rail design and upgrades, and turn-key construction management and inspection services. He is also experienced with managing agency approvals, environmental requirements, and Caltrans and local assistance policies and procedures for state and federally funded projects.

SR 299/Churn Creek Road/Hawley Road
Interchange
Design Engineer
Bethel Church | Redding, CA | $6 million
Assisted with planning, alternatives analysis, and
preparation of the PS&E for a major interchange project that included two modern roundabouts and two signal
modifications. Design elements included bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, landscape features, stormwater
treatment facilities, storm drain systems, and utility
relocations. Successfully delivered to construction a
construction cost of approximately $6 million.

US 101/Trinidad Interchange Project Study
Report-Project Development Support (PSRPDS)
Project Engineer
Trinidad Rancheria | Trinidad, CA
Assisted with management of and led the preparation of
a Caltrans PSR-PDS for the purpose of improving
access to the Trinidad Rancheria and Scenic Drive.

Coordinated the development of over a dozen
interchange alternatives including the use of modern
roundabouts. Coordinated delivery of all planning
documents, cost estimates, and final reports. Provided
support for coordination with Caltrans to secure approval of the PSR-PDS and State Transportation Improvement
Program funding for the environmental phase.

Redding Downtown Streets Improvements
Assistant Project Manager
City of Redding | Redding, CA
Assisted with project management (design and
construction) and construction office support duties for this $9.5 million to re-establish city streets and utility improvements through a major downtown corridor.

Provided coordination between State staff and the
contractor. Provided support to help manage project
staff and office engineering services for the duration of construction.
128
36 Brandon Tenney | Project Manager
T 530.691.5781 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Canyon Road Bridge Replacement at AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) Canal Project Manager
Morrison Structures Inc. | Redding, CA | $2 million
Prepared the PS&E for widening of the existing roadway
to conform to the bridge widening/reconstruction over
the ACID at the south end of the City of Redding along
Canyon Road. The work includes drainage
modifications, conform grinding and paving, constructing curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the north side of the
roadway, and staged construction and traffic handling
plans to provide continuous public access during
construction. Preliminary estimates for construction were approximately $2 million.

Girvan Road Bridge Replacement over Olney
Creek
Project Engineer
Morrison Structures Inc. | Redding, CA
Assisted with preparation of the PS&E for widening of
the existing roadway to conform to the bridge
widening/reconstruction over Olney Creek at the south
end of the City of Redding along Girvan Road. The work
included raising the existing profile, drainage
modifications, conform grinding and paving, constructing curb, gutter, and sidewalk on one side of the roadway,
and staged construction and traffic handling plans to
provide continuous public access during construction.

Preliminary estimates for construction were
approximately $2.5-3 million.

Sacramento Drive Bridge Replacement at Olney
Creek
Design Engineer
Morrison Structures Inc. | Redding, CA | $800,000
Assisted with preparation of the PS&E for roadway
reconstruction adjacent to and connecting to the new
bridge across Olney Creek. The project includes
roadway widening and reconstruction, raising the
existing profile of the roadway, drainage modifications, utility coordination and relocation, detailed stage
construction plans, and concrete curbs and sidewalk.

The estimated cost of construction was $800,000 for the civil related improvements.
129
37 Nathan Towlerton | Water Resources Engineer
T 562.206.7983 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com Nathan Towlerton PE, QSD/P, QISP
Water Resources Engineer
Location
Roseville, CA
Experience
14 years
Qualifications/Accreditationsq
– BS, Chemical Engineering (Environmental Process), Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 2006 – Civil Engineer, CA #81643
– Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer/Practitioner, CA #26239 – Qualified Industrial Stormwater Practitioner (QISP)
Key technical skills
– Hydraulic & Hydrologic Analysis, Green
Streets/Complete Streets Design, Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer System (MS4) Compliance Program
Improvement
Memberships
– American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
– California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA)
Relevant experience summary
Nathan Towlerton is a licensed professional engineer with extensive experience on a variety of water quality, flood control, and integrated water management projects throughout California. His experience includes hydraulic & hydrologic analysis, green streets/complete streets design, MS4 compliance program improvement, Water Quality Management Plans and SWPPP development, regional Best Management Practice (BMP) implementation, land development, and structural BMP design. He specializes in water quality with particular emphasis on MS4 and Industrial General Permit compliance.

Dana Point Master Plan of Drainage Update
Project Manager
City of Dana Point | Dana Point, CA
Managed update of city-wide Master Plan of Drainage.

The project used the Rational Method module of the
Hydrowin 2014 software program to identify storm drain
deficiencies and propose corrective improvements. The
effort included hydrology/hydraulic analysis of the City’s system for the 10-, 25-, and 100-yr storm events,
identification of priority capital improvement projects, and cost estimating of those projects.

Hall Park Detention Basin
Technical Design Lead
Town of Windsor | Windsor, CA
Served as Technical Design Lead for flood mitigation
project that converted an existing single-use residential park into a multi-use detention basin and park. The
primary goal of the project was to detain peak flows to mitigate flooding at a downstream intersection pone to
frequent flooding. Key elements of the project included a diversion system, headwall, low impact development
features for water quality, and a unique underdrain
system to provide adequate drawdown and provide
year-round use of the park.

Dawn Way/Old Redwood Highway Conveyance
Improvements
Technical Design Lead
Town of Windsor | Windsor, CA
Served as Technical Design Lead for conveyance
improvement project to mitigate flooding at the
intersection of Dawn Way and Old Redwood Highway.

The goal of the project was to correct conveyance
deficiencies identified in the Town’s previously
completed Master Plan of Drainage. Project elements
included a new reinforced concrete box conveyance line, headwalls, junction structure modification, and HighDensity Polyethylene (HDPE) relining of an existing storm drain culvert.
130
38 Nathan Towlerton | Water Resources Engineer
T 562.206.7983 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com Stormwater Quality Management Plan Reviews
Project Manager
City of Oceanside | Oceanside, CA
Acted as expert reviewer of Stormwater Quality
Management Plans on behalf of the City of Oceanside
Engineering Division for projects subject to the current San Diego Region National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 Permit. Also
developed, in conjunction with the GHD team, the City’s BMP Design Manual and Stormwater Quality
Management Plan templates to comply with the current
permit. Additional responsibilities include City staff
permit compliance training and consultation with Capital Improvement Program staff for evaluation of
current/future projects.

Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and
Hydrology Report Reviews
Project Engineer
City of Buena Park | Buena Park, CA
Responsible for the review of WQMPs and Hydrology
Reports on behalf of the City of Buena Park in
accordance with the Santa Ana Region National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4
Permit and the County of Orange Model WQMP &
Technical Guidance Document tor the Preparation of
Conceptual/Preliminary and/or Project WQMPs
reference document. Responsibilities included ensuring
compliance with the Technical Guidance Document,
reviewing and verifying calculations, marking-up
drawings and providing comments on operation and
maintenance plans.

Kelly Drive and Park Drive Road Diet
Project Engineer
City of Carlsbad | Carlsbad, CA
Provided green streets design and Stormwater Quality
Management Plan support for multi-modal operational
improvement project in Carlsbad. The project consisted
of a complete streets approach with stormwater BMPs,
buffered bike lanes, enhanced sidewalks, protected
trails, and intersection roundabouts.

La Palma Avenue and Richfield Road
Stormwater Infiltration Project System
Project Engineer
City of Anaheim | Anaheim, CA
Provided hydrologic/hydraulic analysis and design of
grant-funded storm drain improvement/infiltration project.

The project included construction of new storm drain
lines to divert stormwater flows to existing regional
infiltration basins and mitigate local roadway flooding.

Project tasks included hydraulic modeling (Personal
Computer Stormwater Management Model (PCSWMM)),
system design, and construction support.

Richfield Road
Project Engineer
City of Anaheim | Anaheim, CA
Performed alternatives and feasibility analysis for City of Anaheim area storm drain infrastructure. Analysis
included dynamic modeling of storm drain network to
minimize stormwater infrastructure and mitigate peak
flow rates. The feasibility study analyzed multiple options for storm drain infrastructure improvement with an
emphasis on obtaining grant funding through specific
improvement characteristics.

Lambert Road Water Quality Management Plan
Project Engineer
Orange County Department of Public Works |
Orange County, CA
Developed a water quality management plan for the
Orange County Public Works bikeway project.

Development included site evaluation, hydrologic
analysis, and specification and design of stormwater
BMPs in accordance with Orange County Model Water
Quality Management Plan and US Environmental
Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Green Streets Handbook.
131
39 Erick Osorno | Electrical Engineer
T 707.921.7653 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Erick Osorno EE
Electrical Engineer
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Experience
6 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– BS, Electrical Engineering, California State University, Fresno, CA, 2019 – Electrical Engineer, CA #23831, AZ #80897
Key technical skills
– Auto CAD, Revit, AGI 32, Energy Pro, Excel, Word,
MicroStation
Memberships
– N/A
Relevant experience summary
Erick Osorno is an electrical engineer with experience in electrical system design. His design experience includes medium and low voltage design for industrial educational and commercial power, power generation, lighting and lighting controls design, lighting analysis and modelling, telecommunications, motor controls, pump controls, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems, construction cost estimates, load calculations, and drafting of construction documents. Erick is an excellent communicator with good team management skills. His background includes clients in municipal, private industrial, and federal.

Old Orchard Site and Pathway Lighting
Electrical Designer
Sares Regis Management | Sunnyvale, CA
Served as Electrical Designer for the design of lighting for new pathway and area lighting at the Old Orchard
Apartments. Design included site planning, providing
power to new lights, replacing existing lighting in-place, and updating analog switching timers with digital
astronomic timeclock controls. Provided lighting
modeling and analysis using AGI32 software, and
drafted design drawings using AutoCAD, including site
plans and schedules.

University of California Santa Cruz Antenna Site
Generator Project
Electrical Engineer
County of Santa Cruz | Santa Cruz, CA
Served as Electrical Engineer of record for the
installation of a 150-kW emergency generator for cellular providers antenna located at University of California
Santa Cruz campus. Design included basis of design
memorandum for the project, load calculations to size
and select new generator, feeders, circuit breakers,
automatic transfer switch, disconnect switches, and
designed modifications to existing power infrastructure.

Generator sizing and selection to meet Monterey Bay Air Resource District approval and to meet emission
guidelines per best available control technology.

Preparation of construction cost estimate and
construction documents with site plan, single line
diagram, schedules, details, and technical specifications.

Redway Community Services District
Wastewater Treatment improvement Project
Electrical Engineer
County of Humboldt | Redway, CA
Served as Electrical Engineer of record for the
improvements at Redway Community Services District’s
collection system and wastewater treatment plant.

Design included load calculation to evaluate electrical capacity at site for new processing equipment,
coordination with local utility company for electrical
service upgrades, sizing of new service equipment and
motor control center. Addition of new panel, feeder
sizing, breaker sizes and grounding requirements to
meet local and state electrical codes.

Mendocino Unified School District-Recycled
Water System Project
Electrical Designer
County of Mendocino | Mendocino, CA
132
40 Erick Osorno | Electrical Engineer
T 707.921.7653 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Served as Electrical Designer for a new 250,000-gallon
stainless steel water tank and control building. Design included providing power to various wells,
instrumentation to new tank, power and lighting for new control building, power to HVAC, mechanical processing
equipment, addition of new controls, panel, feeder
sizing, breaker sizes and grounding requirements to
meet local and state electrical codes, and the design of a new backup generator system. Provided load
calculation for a new utility power service and sizing of new generator. Drafted design drawings using AutoCAD,
which included site plans, details, schedules, and
diagrams.

Great Artesia Boulevard
Electrical Engineer
City of Long Beach | Long Beach, CA
Served as Electrical Engineer for the design of new
street lighting along a 3.0-mile section of Artesia
Boulevard. design included photometric
modelling/analysis, lighting, lighting controls, voltage drop calculations, circuiting, development of construction documents, construction cost estimate, and coordination with utility power company for new services to traffic and lighting pedestals.

Shoreline Drive Realignment
Electrical Engineer
City of Long Beach | Long Beach, CA
Served as Electrical Engineer for the design of new
street and pedestrian/bike lane lighting along Shoreline Boulevard. Design included photometric
modeling/analysis, lighting, lighting controls, voltage drop calculations, circuiting, development of construction documents, construction cost estimate, and coordination with utility power company for new services to traffic and lighting pedestals.

Foothill Data Center Floor T.I.

Electrical Designer
County of Placer | New Castle, CA
Served as Electrical Designer for the expansion of the
electrical and server room design. Design included
design of new lighting and controls, transformer,
disconnect and branch panel upgrades branch panel to
accommodate new server racks and additional loads.

Drafted design drawings using AutoCAD to include
power/lighting plans, single line diagrams and details.

Redwood Coast Transit Authority Williams
Drive Electric Bus Charging Infrastructure
Study
Electrical Engineer
Del Norte County | Crescent, CA
Served as Electrical Engineer performing existing power system evaluation to determine needs for new Electric
Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure at cities bus yard.

Developed site plan and single-line diagram with major
equipment, coordinated with client preferred EV bus fleet and EV charging connections manufacturers to size
electrical power system. Coordinated with utility power company for new utility power service. Developed Basis
of Design Report.
133
41 Tom Hessel | Landscape Architect
T 916.256.2675 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
Tom Hessel PLA, LEED AP
Landscape Architect
Location
Roseville, CA
Experience
20 years
Qualifications/Accreditations
– BS, Landscape Architecture, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, 2006 – Landscape Architect, CA #6552
– Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Accredited Professional Key technical skills
– Project Management, Planting and Irrigation Design,
Park Design, Site Planning, CAD, LandF/X, Sketchup
& Lumion User
Memberships
– American Society of Landscape Architects
Relevant experience summary
Tom Hessel is a landscape architect who supports GHD’s various consulting services. He provides comprehensive landscape architecture design services for all types of projects, including roadway related projects, multi-family projects, commercial/office/industrial/institutional projects, public works projects, and parks projects. As a result of this design effort, Tom regularly prepares Three-Dimensional (3D) computer graphics illustrating a variety of design engineering concepts and landscape design elements for presentation, public outreach, and community hearings.

Tom has over 20 years of design, CAD management, and project management experience within the field of landscape architecture. He has worked on a variety of projects in the United States and abroad, including mixeduse commercial developments, municipal and institutional projects, single and multi-family developments, as well as large-scale and high-end residential projects while employed at several Landscape Architecture firms and design-build companies across Southern and Northern California.

Fort Ord Recreational Trail and Greenway
(FORTAG) – Segment 1
Landscape Architect
Transportation Agency for Monterey County |
Monterey County, CA
The FORTAG project includes PS&E development of the

1.75-mile-long first segment of an approximately 28-
mile-long regional multi-use trail system. Project
includes landscape architectural services for trail
alignment, entry nodes and rest areas, wayfinding,
amenities, planting, and irrigation. The FORTAG trail will ultimately traverse through the old Fort Ord military base in Monterey County. The trail will connect to an existing regional bikeway and trail system and link the currently disconnected areas and cities they fall in as well as
enhance and embrace the natural environments that it
will intersect.

Hanson Russian River Access and Trail Project
Landscape Architect
Sonoma County Regional Parks Dept. | Windsor, CA
Conceptual design development for a new regional park,
trail, boat portage, and seasonal campground. Site
layout plans and visualizations were developed to meet
code requirements and project goals for providing
access and public use. A multi-use trail alignment was
designed providing access to a new seasonal
campground and public parking facilities. The trail and campground are situated on the upland perimeter of a
proposed floodplain establishment on the Russian River.

Gleason Beach-Park and Trails
Landscape Architect
Sonoma County Regional Parks | Sonoma County,
CA
134
42 Tom Hessel | Landscape Architect
T 916.256.2675 | E [email protected] www.ghd.com
In conjunction with Caltrans and the County of Sonoma,
this project is one of the first of its kind in California dealing with the impacts of coastal erosion due to sealevel rise. A multi-faceted project, it aims to restore Scotty Creek, move, and elevate a portion of Highway 1, provide safe and functional access to the Beach, extend and modify an existing trail, provide outlooks and park area capable of adaptation to the inevitable bluff erosion.

The project is currently in the SD phase.

Savan GUT, Phase 2
Landscape Architect/Discipline Lead
Charlotte Amalie - St. Thomas | US Virgin Islands,
USA
The main purpose of the project is to reduce flood
damages to the Jane E. Tuitt Elementary School and the
Central Business District in downtown Charlotte Amalie
by converting the current ½ mile open water flood
channel into a covered concrete box culvert. As part of this work, seven unique parklets/plaza’s will be designed adjacent a linear pedestrian walkway above the box
culvert intended to connect remnant cultural/historical structures, provide safe passage through town away
from congested streets, and promote reengaging the
historic downtown district with the residential
neighborhood that resides above. The current open
channel divides the town physically and collects
unwanted trash and debris. The proposed design will
provide much needed safe gathering spaces and
multiple community connections meant to enhance the
quality of life for the residents.

Olympians Park**
Project Manager/Designer
Location | Sacramento, CA
Olympians Park is a 3.4-acre neighborhood park that
sits within an urban infill housing development, The Mill at Broadway, located near downtown Sacramento, CA.

The park is designed to be a destination for both
residents of The Mill and visitors from the Sacramento
region. As a dense urban site, homes within the
community afford little private outdoor space. The park design reflects this need for an outdoor space that
serves as a community’s backyard. The park is
organized into a multifunctional set of outdoor rooms
that include an amphitheater, a picnic and BBQ area
with a bocce court, a dog park, and an event lawn. A
quarter-mile bike and jogging trail circumnavigates the park and connects to a larger bike network that leads to the Sacramento river and to downtown.

West Apartments**
Project Manager/Designer
Location | Sacramento, CA
The first residential project on the waterfront of the West Sacramento Bridge District. WEST Apartments is a
mixed-use project on the Sacramento River across from
Raley Field in West Sacramento. The project takes
advantage of significant views overlooking the river,
Tower Bridge, Raley Field and Downtown Sacramento.

Ground floor retail on Riverfront Street provides 8,000 square feet of active street frontage facing the Rivercats Baseball Stadium. The project has a variety of private, common, and public open spaces with a seamless
integration into the existing Riverwalk trail. The private outdoor space around the pool is embraced within the
northeast wing of the building. An ornamental iron fence is designed for views to the river and Riverwalk, while also providing a level of privacy and security for the
residents. Open spaces on the east side of the
project are integrated into the landscape of the
Riverwalk.

The Lohse Apartments**
Project Manager/Designer
Location | Roseville, CA
Working with Mogavero Architects and Mercy Housing
California, The Lohse apartments helped accomplish the
goals of the “Downtown Specific Plan.” The landscape
plans consisted of street scape planting, public plaza
area for the attached commercial space, and rear
outdoor amenity space with playground, lawn area,
flexible seating patio and shade structure for residents 135
43 Contact
+1 949 553-6443
[email protected]
Location
Irvine, CA
Years' Experience
41 Qualifications/Accreditations
– MBA, Master of Business
Administration (M.B.A.), Finance,
Real Estate, Marketing, Stanford
University Graduate School of
Business
Key Technical Skills
– Feasibility studies
– Strategic market optimization
and implementation programs
– Repositioning strategies
– Tenant mix recommendations
– Acquisition/financing due
diligence
– Consumer market research
– Retail brainstorming charrettes
– Expert witness research/
testimony
Specific consulting functions
include
– Conduct trade area analysis,
competitive assessment and
voids inventory
– Identify key effects of trade
area demographic and lifestyle
characteristics and determine
prime target markets for
positioning strategies
– Prepare expenditure potential
project sales projections from
target markets
– Determine retail center,
supportable square footage and
realistically achievable rents
– Prepare “highest-and-bestuse” development concept
programs, including detailed
product mix, pricing and sizing
recommendations
– Recommend tenant mix and
development implementation
strategies for sales and rent
optimization
Linda S. Congleton, Principal and founder of LSCA, is a graduate of the Stanford University Graduate School of Business and the University of California at Berkeley. Upon graduation from the Stanford Business School, Ms. Congleton was a real estate project manager at Nu-West, reporting to the California Division President of this Canadian development company. Prior to founding LSCA in 1984, Ms. Congleton managed the Newport Beach, California office of Robert Charles Lesser & Co., a national residential and commercial real estate consulting company.

Ms. Congleton is a member of the Urban Land Institute, where she served for many years on ULI’s Commercial/Retail Council. She also served numerous ULI Advisory Panels for cities across the nation. For several years, Ms. Congleton was the principal instructor at ULI’s twoday, multi-city, shopping center development educational Workshops for experienced real estate professionals.

Ms. Congleton is also a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers. She has been a speaker on topical real estate market and financial issues at conferences held by ICSC as well as the Appraisal Institute; the Food Marketing Institute; the International Association of Amusement Parks; the Chamber of Commerce and Cities; and several Economic Development Councils. She has taught courses at the University of California at Los Angeles and the University of California at Irvine’s Graduate School of Urban & Regional Planning.

LSCA’s Unique Services
LSCA has over 40 years of experience providing strategic, mixed-use and retail implementation, consultation; financial advisory services; and due diligence acquisition review to developers/owners; large landowners; Cities and governmental agencies; mixed-use and resort developers; investors; financial firms; pension funds; and chainstore retailers� Our clients retain the company for complex, customized assignments that result in workable solutions for the client’s senior Management team� Retail consultation assignments involve tenant mix optimization/releasing evaluations; shopping center, due diligence, market and financial acquisition reviews; shopping center repositioning and/or turn-around issues; and specialized tourist/visitor sites with significant retail potential� Most assignments involve shopping center and/ or retail/restaurant sales projections; rent deal structuring and landlord revenue stream estimates; and targeted or recommended store sizing recommendations� The LSCA team has often worked as part of multi-disciplinary consulting teams with City Management teams, residential and gaming professionals, as well as architects and land use planners�
LSCA’s Global Experience
LSCA’s notable development clients have included Simon Property Group; Urban Retail Properties; JMB Federated Realty; Trizec-Hahn Centers; KRAVCO; Lend Lease Development; Madison Marquette Realty, Forest City and the Mills Corporation� LSCA’s visitor/tourist-based advisory services have included projects for Disney Development; Universal Studios (City Walk); Lucasfilm; and Silver Dollar City theme Linda S. Congleton
Economics and Development Strategy
GHD | City of Escalon | Economic Development Strategic Plan 13 136
44 park� LSCA’s shopping center clients have included many notable development companies, including James Rouse,
founder of The Rouse Company and owner of some of the most productive tourist-oriented shopping centers in the nation� The company has provided municipal economic development and redevelopment consulting/advisory services since the 1980s� Other U�S� and international hotel/resort/mixed use retail consulting engagements have been with Hyatt Development; KSL Development Corporation; Koll Development Malaysia; Trammell Crow Company; Howard Hughes Corporation; the
Huntington Beach Resort Hotel (Hyatt); and numerous Las Vegas casinos and master-planned communities� LSCA
has also provided real estate site analysis; expert witness testimony; and site-specific revenue projections for high profile retailers, including Target Corporation; Tokyu Department store; McDonalds; TESCO Corporation; Associated Wholesale Grocers; Thrifty Foods (grocery chain); and BJ’s Restaurant & Brewhouse, a $5�0 million-per-store, national, casual dining, restaurant chain�
LSCA has also advised many community-oriented shopping
centers, with a focus on large (10,000 to 80,000+ home) communities, such as those built in Florida, Texas, California and Nevada� Selected residential developer clients have included Arvida; The Irvine Company; Shea Homes; Newhall Land & Farming Company; Del Webb Corporation; and Howard Hughes Corporation� International community-oriented
assignments have included Desa Park City in Malaysia and a resort community in Aruba�
Over the span of 40+ years, the company’s consulting
engagements have covered nearly every major metropolitan area in the U�S�, with emphasis on high growth corridors in the West, Southwest and Southeast� International retail locations have included Israel; Canada; the Caribbean; Europe; and Asia�

LSCA REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS
Select Cities & Public Clients
Alameda, Anaheim, Akron, Beaumont (CA), Beverly Hills, Celina (TX), Chino, Commerce, Cupertino, Dallas (TX), El Monte, Huntington Beach, Huntington Park, La Quinta, Lewisville (TX), Long Beach, Los Angeles, Mission Viejo, Newport Beach, Norwalk, Oceanside, Pasadena, Port Hueneme, Redondo
Beach, Riverside, Sachse (TX), San Jose, San Juan Capistrano, San Leandro, San Marino, Signal Hill, Sparks (NV), Twentynine Palms, West Covina, Yorba Linda
– Select Private & Institutional Clients
– Aetna Realty Investors, Inc�; San Jose, California
– Alecta Investment Management; New London, Connecticut – Anthem by Del Webb; Anthem, Arizona
– Arvida; Boca Raton, Florida
– Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc�; Kansas City, Kansas – Bedford Properties, Inc�; Lafayette, California
– BJ’s Restaurant, Inc�; Huntington Beach, California
– Boston Properties; San Francisco, California
– Bridge Housing Corporation; San Diego, California
– California State University Channel Islands; Camarillo, California
– Castle & Cooke Homes Hawaii; Honolulu, Hawaii
– Catellus Development Corporation; San Francisco, California – D�R� Horton; Pleasanton, California
– Disney Development Company; Burbank, California
– DMB, Inc�; Phoenix, Arizona
– EBSCO Gulf Coast Development Inc� (Alys Beach); Santa Rosa Beach, Florida
– Ellis Partners LLC; San Francisco, California
– Eric Knudsen Trust; Kauai, Hawaii
– Forest City Development; Cleveland, Ohio
– Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market (TESCO); El Segundo, California
– Goldman Sachs Group Inc�; New York, New York
– Harrah’s Casino Hotel; Las Vegas, Nevada
– Holualoa Companies; Tucson, Arizona
– Home Depot; Santa Maria, California
– Hunt Hawaii; Honolulu, Hawaii
– HVS International; San Francisco, California
– Hyatt Development Corporation; Chicago, Illinois
– IDS Real Estate Group; Los Angeles, California
– Irvine Company; Irvine, California
– Kamehameha Schools; Honolulu, Hawaii
– Kapalua; Maui, Hawaii
– Koll Development Company (Malaysia); Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
– Kona Pacific Farmers Cooperative; Captain Cook, Hawaii – KRAVCO; King of Prussia, Pennsylvania
– KSL Development Corporation; La Quinta, California
– Las Vegas Sands Corp�; Las Vegas, Nevada
– Lucasfilm; Nicasio, California
– MacFarlane Partners Investment Management, LLC; San
Francisco, California
– Maguire Properties; Los Angeles, California
– Marina Bay Sands Pte� Ltd�; Singapore
– MCA Development Company; Universal City, California
– McDonald’s Corporation; Woodland Hills, California
– Nack Development; Frisco, Texas
– Newhall Land & Farming Company; Valencia, California
– Northwestern Mutual Life; Los Angeles, California
– Ohio State Teacher’s Retirement System; Columbus, Ohio – Pacifica Capital Group, Inc�; Los Angeles, California GHD | City of Escalon | Economic Development Strategic Plan 14 137
45 – Pacific Gas & Electric Company; San Francisco, California – Parmenter Realty Partners; Dallas, Texas
– Perdana ParkCity Sdn Bhd, Desa ParkCity; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
– Plains Exploration & Production Co�; Montebello, California – Pueblo of Sandia; Albuquerque, New Mexico
– Queen Lili’uokalani Trust; Honolulu, Hawaii
– R�C� Hobbs Company; Orange, California
– Reno Land Inc�; Reno, Nevada
– Regent Properties, Inc�; Los Angeles, California
– Robert Mayer Corporation; Newport Beach, California
– RREEF; San Francisco, California
– Seaside Community Development; Seaside, Florida
– Sands China Ltd�; Hong Kong, SAR
– Shea Mountain House LLC; Livermore, California
– Shapell Industries, Inc�; Beverly Hills, California
– Signature Properties; Pleasanton, California
– Silver Dollar City, Inc�; Branson, Missouri
– Simon Property Group; Indianapolis, Indiana
– Sondermann Ring Partners; Marina Del Rey, California
– STACKED; Yorba Linda, California
– Stanford Carr Development LLC; Honolulu, Hawaii
– State Teacher’s Retirement System of Ohio; Columbus, Ohio – Summerlin; Las Vegas, Nevada
– Target Corporation; Minneapolis, Minnesota
– TIAA-CREF Financial Services Global Real Estate; Newport Beach, California
– Tokyu Department Store; Tokyo, Japan
– Trammel Crow Company; Los Angeles, California
– TrizecHahn Corporation; Toronto, Canada & San Diego,
California
– Urban Retail Properties Company; Chicago, Illinois
– Utah (State) Trust Lands Administration; St� George, Utah – Vistancia Development LLC; Peoria, AZ
– Viera Company; Viera, Florida
– Watt Commercial Properties; Santa Monica, California
– Western Development Corporation; Washington, D�C�
– Yarmouth Group; Los Angeles, California
GHD | City of Escalon | Economic Development Strategic Plan 15 138
46 GHD & LSCA References
Our References
The following six references all speak to the qualification and quality of services of Linda S� Congleton Associates� The first three references (below) also represent GHD’s strategic planning experience and the integrated work approach of both GHD and LSCA�
Mr. Travis Clark
Community Development Director
City of Desert Hot Springs
11999 Palm Drive
Desert Hot Springs, CA
1-760-329-6411 ext� 240
tclark@cityofdhs�org
Formerly Community Development Director
City of Twentynine Palms
6136 Adobe Road
Twentynine Palms, CA
1-760-367-6799
tclark@29palms�org
Retail/Commercial And Mixed-Use Demand And Strategic
Program Opportunity Recommendations For 29 Palms
Downtown Specific Plan (December, 2021); Team project
with GHD.

Ms. Cheri Flores
Planning Manager
Design & Development Department
City of La Quinta
78495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA
1-760-777-7067
CLFlores@LaQuintaCA�gov
Development Implementation Strategy Study & Real Estate Market Study, Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan (Summer 2022); Team project with GHD.

Mr. Kyle Warsinski
Economic Development Director
City of Moreno Valley
14177 Frederick St�
Moreno Valley, CA
1-951-413-3460
kylewa@moval�org
Formerly Economic Development Manager, City of Beaumont Downtown Beaumont Revitalizaton Plan (2023-2024); Team
project with GHD.

Mr. Jerod Potts
Economic Development Director
City of Sachse City Manager’s Office
3815-B Sachse Road
Sachse, Texas
1-469-429-4764
jpotts@cityofsachse�com
Sachse 5th Street Strategic Retail Consultation Report
(January, 2020)
Mr. Armando Ornelas
Senior Associate
Citygate Associates
Folsom, CA
1-916-318-3684
Formerly Community Services Director and former
Redevelopment Manager (with city since 1999)
City of Sparks
431 Prater Way
City of Sparks, NV
1-775-353-1644
aornelas@cityofsparks�us
Victorian Square Downtown Masterplan Strategic
Consultation (2003-2006, 2016)
Mr. Donny Churchman
President
Nack Development
Frisco, Texas
1-972-330-3819
donny@nackdevelopment�com
Nack Development is a successful, “small town” Downtown mixed-use developer in North Dallas, Texas
Downtown Frisco Retail/Restaurant/Commercial Demand &
Sales Potential for Downtown Frisco Sites (2017)
Historic Downtown Celina Master Plan Strategic Retail Phase I Consultation (2018)
Old Town Lewisville Restaurant/Retail/Commercial
Feasibility Potential, Highest And Best Uses And Demand Analysis For Two Commercial Sites (June, 2022)
139
Our plan for 15-story mixed use center with
embedded transit in Canberra, Australia
140
 





  





 !"!
#$ %
& !"! '#$ %()"*'+,- 
. /0*
12324541
64735
89 :$,
;<0=
&><0=(,%"!%!+!')?- @AB**
B=0)0 C!
&B**'B=0)0 C!()"*'+,-D
#$ *!
E )0
&$ *!(+ )0 + %$ )'+,- 4
!!+",0 %
F1G6
:HI 9 
J"!%!K;00
L=M%!K4541K5154NOPQREPQ
;PP'M*>D
5K9 
J"!%!K;00
L=M%!K4541K5S44'M*>D TU
VUWX

YZ[
\]^_`ab
c]deZ[b_\U]dX
faeZ
[ZeUbZ^
_d^
_\\_cgZ^
hTiab
jZZ
k[]k]b_l
j][
`]m[
mbZ
_b
`]m
_kk[]eZ
]m[
n][op
im[Udq
]m[
c]deZ[b_\U]d
nZ
\[UWWZ^
rstuvwx
j[]W
\gZ
][UqUd_l
jZZp

ym[
_kk[]_cg
_e]U^Z^
jmd^_WZd\_l
cg_dqZb
\] \gZ
kl_ddUdq
_d^
Zc]d]WUcb
n][o
_d^
W_Ud\_UdZ^
_ll
Ud\Zd^Z^
z]nd
T_llbp

zgZ
j]ll]nUdq
\_bob
nZ[Z
_jjZc\Z^
_b
^Zbc[U{Z^| }~€
‚
ƒ
„
†‡ˆ‰Š
‹Œ‰€
ŽŽ

ƒ‘†‰~ŠŒ†
’ˆˆ~
‰“ ”Z^mcZ^
\UWZ
j][
•]d
–Udomb
\]
k_[\UcUk_\Z
Ud
k[]—Zc\
UdU\U_\U]d
_d^
bU\Z
\]m[bp

zgUb
b\Ull
c]eZ[b
]m[
oUco˜]jj
^_`X
z]nd T_ll
™š
_d^
_d
_^^U\U]d_l
g_lj
^_`
]j
\[_eZl
]d
]dZ
Zd^
]j
\g_\p

ym[
l]c_l
\[_dbk][\_\U]d
_d^
cUeUl
lZ_^b
nUll
d]\ _\\Zd^
\gZ
oUco]jjX
{m\
z]^^
bg]ml^
{Z
_{lZ
\]
c_ll
Udp

}~€
‚s
ƒ
’ˆ›œ~

žŒˆŠ
ž††
ŸŒ~ŠŒ†
ˆˆŠŒ› zgZ
l_d^bc_kZ
_[cgU\Zc\m[Z
\Z_W
n_b
[ZW]eZ^
j[]W
[Zqml_[
c]][^Ud_\U]d
WZZ\Udqbp

}~€
s‚x
ƒ
¡~¢Œ
†Ž
£¤ŒŠŒ›
¥ŠŒŒŠŒˆ

ž†ˆ‰ŠŒ† ym[
cUeUl
¦
m\UlU\UZb
\Z_W
nUll
d]\
{Z
kZ[j][WUdq
UdU\U_l
j_cUlU\`
c]d^U\U]d
_d^
c_k_cU\`
_d_l`bUbp
§]WZ
^_\_
q_\gZ[Udq b\Ull
W_`
{Z
kZ[j][WZ^
\]
Udclm^Z
Ud
\gZ
jUd_l
k[]—Zc\
[Zk][\X
{m\
\gUb
ZlUWUd_\Zb
_d`
_bbZbbWZd\
]j
Z¨Ub\Udq
c_k_cU\`p

}~€
s‚v
ƒ
©œªª~
¢
£¤ŒŠŒ›
ž†ŸŒŠŒ†
’ˆ«†
Š ¬l]dq
nU\g
[Z^mc\U]db
Ud
z_bo
­p®X
\gZ
cUeUl
¦
m\UlU\UZb
\Z_W
nUll
d]\
c]d\[U{m\Z
\]
\gZ
Z¨Ub\Udq
c]d^U\U]db
[Zk][\p
zgUb W_`
WZ_d
\gZbZ
\]kUcb
_[Z
d]\
Udclm^Z^
Ud
\gZ
Z¨Ub\Udq
c]d^U\U]db
^]cmWZd\_\U]d
{Z`]d^
_d
_kkZd^U¨
]j
Z¨Ub\Udq ¯U\`˜k[]eU^Z^
^_\_p

}~€
°‚x
ƒ
}†±
²~
³s
ƒ
„~
¡Šˆ
~ŠŒ´ˆ
µ†
€“†« zgZ
l_d^bc_kZ
_[cgU\Zc\m[Z
lZ_^
nUll
d]\
_^eUbZ
]d
^ZbUqd
_l\Z[d_\UeZb
j][
z]nd
T_ll
™­p

”mbb
¶Zdg_WX
]m[
bZdU][ l]c_l
bZdU][
^ZeZl]kWZd\
_d^
cUeUl
lZ_^
Ud
”Z^^Udq
nUll
d]\
_\\Zd^
z]nd
T_llbp

}~€
x‚t
ƒ
·Œ~
£‰††ªŒ‰
·ˆ~Œ¸ŒŒŠ¢

¹ˆ´ˆ†«ªˆŠ
©Š
~Šˆ›¢
’ˆ«†
Š –Ud^_
¯]dqlZ\]d
nUll
d]\
k[]eU^Z
_d
_ll
Zdc]Wk_bbUdq
jUd_l
[Zk][\
]j
gZ[
[ZbZ_[cgp

zgZU[
jUd^Udqb
_d^ [Zc]WWZd^_\U]db
nUll
b\Ull
bmkk][\
hTiab
kl_ddUdq
n][o

¬b
^UbcmbbZ^X
\gZ[Z
Ub
_
l]qUc
\]
\gZ
bZlZc\U]d
]j
\gZbZ
\_bobp

º]dZ
_jjZc\
\gZ
jmd^_WZd\_l
n][o
]j
l_d^
mbZX cU[cml_\U]d
_d^
Zc]d]WUcb
kl_ddUdq
n][op

¯U\`
^Zk_[\WZd\b
W_`
{Z
_{lZ
\]
bmkk][\
_
[Z\m[d
]j
jZZ
{_bZ^
]d
\gZU[ [ZbkZc\UeZ
\]kUcbp

»][
Z¨_WklZX
km{lUc
n][ob
][
c]WWmdU\`
^ZeZl]kWZd\
W_`
{Z
_{lZ
\]
{_cojUll
jmd^b
[Zl_\Z^
\] m\UlU\`
_d_l`bUbp

–UoZnUbZX
\gZ
¯U\`
¼_d_qZ[
W_`
g_eZ
_
c_bZ
\]
W_oZ
j][
–Ud^_ab
jUd_l
[Zk][\
^]cmWZd\p

fj
nZ
dZZ^ 141
 







 


 


  


 


  


!"
#$%&'()*+,,-.&) /01

23

"
456
77$
""8% 9:;<=>;?@A:BC>;:+:?D:BE&F:B>;?G 
HIJ KLMNOPQRSTUTSVWVSVXYVZ[Q\]^_P`_^abL^cdefg`haO]iZbL^cNhj^ kXlm]hh_Mhn_opqdLPNXllpjMrL^NpstuqtZvvvag`haO]i  wxyz{|}y~{€{~yx~{w}‚~ƒ„
†‡ˆ„‰Š„‹Œ‰Ž„‹ˆ‹ˆ‘‘ˆŒƒ‡†‹‘
Š„
Œ’‹“„Ž†‹‘„ˆ‰ˆ‹Ž‡ˆ”† •–„—„‰††Ž˜{“’ˆ–†‹’‘‘ƒ†„‹‘†‹Ž†Ž–†Œ„•„†‹‘•‰†ˆ †‹’‘„“‘ƒ†
†‹Ž†–„‡‡†Ž„ˆ‘†‰Šˆ‹Ž•‰†ˆ
† Ž†‰†‘†„‘™’
ƒ’‰Ž‹’‘Œ’•„‘’–
†„‘“’–ˆ‹•–•’
†’–Ž„
Œ‰’
†„‘
Œ’‹‘†‹‘
‘’ˆ‹’‘ƒ†–•†–
’‹˜ š›|ˆ‹Ž„‘
ˆ““„‰„ˆ‘†
–†
†–—†‘ƒ†–„ƒ‘‘’‡’‹„‘’–ˆ‹Ž‡’Ž„“ˆ‰‰†‡ˆ„‰Œ’‡‡‹„Œˆ‘„’‹ ‘ƒ–’ƒ‘ƒ†„– ‹†‘œ’–
˜
142
Jonathan
Llnkus
Planning
Team Tom Hessel
Landscape
Team Meg Sigler
Circulation
Team
Brandon
Tenney
Nathan
Towlerton
Erick
Orsono
Todd
Tregenza
Russel
Wenham
Project
Accountant
Linda
Congleton
Senior
Consultant
Research
Associate
Planning
Lead / PM
Site
Modeling
Landscape
Architect
Landscape
Visuals
Circulation
Design
Ciculation
Visuals
Water
Utilities
Stormwater
Design
Electrical
Utilities
Project
Director
Project QA /
QC
Invoicing &
Budget
Market
Strategest
Real Estate
Analyst
Field & Info
Gathering
Project Proposed Rate:
$ 255 $ 236 $ 255 $ 200 $ 290 $ 228 $ 290 $ 290 $ 275 $ 300 $ 322 $ 180 $ 250 $ 200 $ 50 Task 1 - Project Kickoff & Coordination 30 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 10 4 12 22 0 16 1,000 $ 15,838 $ 6,300 $ 23,138 $

1.1 Project Kick Off & On-Location Research  12 - - - - - - - - 2 - - 16 - 16 $ 1,000 3,660 $ 4,800 $ 9,460 $

1.2 Regular Client Coordination Meetings   6 - - - 6 - - - - 2 4 - 6 - - $ - 5,158 $ 1,500 $ 6,658 $

1.3 Project Management & Invoicing 12 - - - - - - - - 6 - 12 - - - $ - 7,020 $ -$ 7,020 $ Task 2 - Existing Conditions Analysis 32 40 0 0 6 32 0 0 0 4 8 0 16 2 24 -$ 30,412 $ 5,600 $ 36,012 $

2.1 Data Gathering & Base Documentation  8 24 - - - 16 - - - - 2 0 - - - $ - 11,996 $ -$ 11,996 $

2.2 Analysis of Existing Policies & Plans 8 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ - 3,928 $ -$ 3,928 $

2.3 Analysis of Existing Traffic Conditions  - - - - 2 8 - - - 2 - - - - - $ - 3,004 $ -$ 3,004 $

2.4 Analysis of Existing Utilities & Connections  - - - - - - - - - - 4 0 - - - $ - 1,288 $ -$ 1,288 $

2.5 Area-Wide & National Economic Trends; & Interim Memo  - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 2 24 $ - -$ 5,600 $ 5,600 $

2.6 Summary Existing Conditions Report  16 8 - - 4 8 - - - 2 2 - - - - $ - 10,196 $ -$ 10,196 $ Task 3 - Community Engagement Process 30 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 3,400 $ 9,970 $ 6,000 $ 19,370 $

3.1 Engagement Strategy & Communications Package 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ - 1,020 $ -$ 1,020 $

3.2 Community SWOT Analysis & Initial Vision  2 - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - $ - 510 $ 2,000 $ 2,510 $

3.3 Town Hall #1 - Market Conditions & Vision Workshop  8 - - - - - - - - - - - 16 - - $ 1,200 2,040 $ 4,000 $ 7,240 $

3.4 Town Hall #2 - Plan Alternatives Workshop   8 - - - 8 - - - - - - - - - - $ 1,200 4,360 $ -$ 5,560 $

3.5 Town Hall #3 - Plan Finalization Workshop 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ 1,000 2,040 $ -$ 3,040 $ Task 4 - Economic Report & Development Strategy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 10 36 -$ -$ 13,800 $ 13,800 $

4.1 Residential Market Analysis & Demand Estimate  - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 2 8 $ - -$ 2,800 $ 2,800 $

4.2 Commercial & Lodging Market Analysis & Demand Estimate  - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 2 8 $ - -$ 2,800 $ 2,800 $

4.3 Light Industrial Market Analysis & Demand Estimate  - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 2 8 $ - -$ 2,800 $ 2,800 $

4.4 Preparation of Executive Summary & Exhibit Package  - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 4 12 $ - -$ 5,400 $ 5,400 $

4.5 Final Economic Feasibility & Development Strategy Report  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ - -$ -$ - $ Task 5 - Master Plan Development & Design Process 72 36 10 24 4 24 8 8 8 0 0 0 12 0 0 -$ 47,678 $ 3,000 $ 50,678 $

5.1 Precedent Studies & Image Boards  8 4 - - - - - - - - - - 4 - - $ - 2,984 $ 1,000 $ 3,984 $

5.2 Initial Plan & Internal Workshop - "Plan Alternatives"  16 - - - - - - - - - - - 8 - - $ - 4,080 $ 2,000 $ 6,080 $

5.3 Revised Plan & Supporting Diagrams - "Consensus Plan"   24 8 2 8 2 8 8 8 8 - - - - - - $ - 19,362 $ -$ 19,362 $

5.4 Finalized Plan & Supporting Diagrams - "Design Package"   24 24 8 16 2 16 - - - - - - - - - $ - 21,252 $ -$ 21,252 $ Task 6 - Final Master Plan & Implementation Strategy 52 16 2 8 2 8 4 4 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 600 $ 28,702 $ -$ 29,302 $

6.1 Major Draft Master Plan - 75% Plan Report   32 8 2 8 2 8 4 4 4 4 4 - - - - $ - 20,470 $ -$ 20,470 $

6.3 Final Master Plan - 100% Plan Report 16 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - $ - 5,968 $ -$ 5,968 $

6.4 Final Revisions & Adoption Hearings 4 - - - - - - - - 2 2 - - - - $ 600 2,264 $ -$ 2,864 $ 216 92 12 32 26 64 12 12 12 20 18 12 114 12 76 GHD Costs GHD Labor SubconsultantFee Proposal $55,080 $21,712 $3,060 $6,400 $7,540 $14,592 $3,480 $3,480 $3,300 $6,000 $5,796 $2,160 $28,500 $2,400 $3,800 5,000 $ 132,600 $ 34,700 $ 172,300 $ 1,735 $
Grand Total Fee Proposal 174,035 $
Project Share: 44.1% 5.4% 12.7% 5.9% 8.0% 19.9% 199,709 $ Revised Fee Proposal
Date:
06/02/2026 25,674 $
Original Fee Proposal
$76,792
Planning & Design Economics & Development Strategy The Landing: Conceptual Master Plan | Fee Proposal
Circulation Civil & Utilities Quality & Client Experience Landscape Civil / Trans Economics Landscape $9,460 $22,132 $10,260 $13,956 $34,700
Subconsulta
nt
Total Fee &
Expenses
GHD
Direct Costs
&
Travel
Subconsultant Markup (5% of Sub Fee):

Project Total
Not to Exceed
Fee by Task
GHD
Labor Fee
143
Reference no: [Enter reference number]
This Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) is effective this 8th day of June 2026, (“Effective Date”) between GHD Inc., a California corporation (hereinafter “GHD”) and City of Mt Shasta (hereinafter “Client”) (which are collectively referred to as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party”). In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Scope of work.

GHD shall perform the services set forth in the Scope of Work which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". It is understood that the Scope of Work will be based on facts known and laws in place at the time of execution of this Agreement. Each Party will promptly inform the other in writing if facts are discovered that indicate that this Agreement or Scope of Work may need to be modified. If there is a change in law or project assumptions which materially affect either Party’s obligations hereunder, upon receiving or providing the notice described above, the Parties shall execute an amendment which will include, at a minimum, a description of the proposed modifications and their effect on the scope, fees, and timelines specified in the Scope of Work (an “Amendment”).

2. Changes in the services.
a. Except for additional services required due to the fault of GHD, any change to the scope, schedule, extent, or character of the services shall be set forth in a written Amendment which is agreed upon and signed by GHD and Client.
b. Unless otherwise provided herein, GHD shall not be required to perform any additional services unless the Amendment sets forth the scope of the additional services and any adjustment in compensation for, and/or the time to perform, such additional services. c. GHD shall also be entitled to an Amendment setting forth an equitable adjustment to its compensation, based on standard rates for professional services and expenses, if any information provided by, or on behalf of, Client is not complete and/or accurate or, as a result of the services performed hereunder, GHD or any GHD employees are required to give evidence before, or provide any information to, a court or other competent authority. d. GHD shall have no liability for any delay, and the services completion date shall be extended by the equivalent time, associated with Client’s delay in executing an Amendment.

3. Payment for services.
a. For services rendered on a time plus expense basis:
i. The fees will be in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in the Scope of Work. GHD's rates stated in the fee schedule are subject to revision on a periodic basis, following notice to Client.

Personnel rates are all-inclusive, including overhead and profit. ii. GHD shall be reimbursed for all reasonable expenses actually incurred in connection with the services, plus reasonable markup as specified in the Scope of Work, plus reasonable travel and living expenses of GHD staff; communication and technology charges; printing and reproduction costs; photographic expenses; advertising for bids; special delivery and express charges; and costs of providing and maintaining site offices, supplies, and equipment. iii. For services performed or goods supplied by GHD’s subcontractors, Client shall pay GHD for the cost of such services or goods plus markup, as specified in the Scope of Work. b. For services rendered on a lump sum, unit price, or fixed fee basis, Client shall pay GHD for services that are rendered on a percentage complete or task complete basis as specified in the Scope of Work. The fees are all-inclusive, including overhead and profit, and apply to all labor. 144
c. Unless otherwise agreed, GHD will invoice Client monthly for services completed. Payment of GHD invoices shall be due upon receipt by Client. Invoices not paid within thirty (30) calendar days shall be subject to an assessed interest charge of eighteen percent (18%) per annum or the highest amount allowed by law, whichever is less. If Client disputes an invoice, Client shall notify GHD in writing within thirty (30) calendar days of the invoice date identifying the cause of the dispute and paying that portion of the invoice not in dispute. Failure of Client to notify GHD of any disputed amounts within the specified time shall deem the invoice accepted by Client. Interest shall not accrue on any disputed amount.
d. GHD reserves the right without penalty to suspend performance of services in the event Client fails to pay all amounts which are not subject to a bona fide dispute within forty-five (45) calendar days from the invoice date. All suspensions shall extend the completion date of any affected project commensurately unless otherwise agreed to by the Parties.

4. Insurance.

GHD agrees to carry throughout the term of this Agreement insurance policies of the following types and with the following limits, unless otherwise agreed in writing, and will provide certificates of insurance upon request to evidence such insurance:
a. Workers’ compensation – statutory;
b. Employers’ liability - $1,000,000 per accident/disease/employee (US); c. Automobile liability – $1,000,000 combined single limit; d. Commercial general liability – $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in aggregate; and e. Professional liability – $1,000,000 per claim and $2,000,000 in aggregate.

5. Documents and data.
a. Client shall be responsible for, and GHD may rely upon, the accuracy and completeness of all requirements, instructions, reports, data, documents, site information, and other information furnished by Client to GHD pursuant to this Agreement (“Client Data”). Client warrants that it owns all rights to, or otherwise has rights to use and disclose, Client Data required to meet Client obligations set forth herein. Client agrees to grant and hereby grants to GHD a non-exclusive, royaltyfree license to use Client Data and perform all acts with respect to Client Data as necessary to perform the Scope of Work. GHD shall have no obligation to validate the content of Client Data for content, accuracy, usability or for any other purpose.
b. Client acknowledges that project or site information previously provided by Client (or by a third party on Client’s behalf) to GHD personnel not engaged in the provision of the services hereunder shall not be deemed to have been provided to or known by GHD personnel that are engaged in the provision of the services hereunder.
c. Client shall review any reports, plans, designs, drawings, specifications, bids, proposals, and any other work prepared or furnished by GHD under this Agreement (the “Work Product”) before it is finalized. Client shall make decisions within a reasonable time and carry out its other responsibilities in a timely manner so as not to delay the services. Client shall give prompt written notice to GHD whenever Client observes or otherwise becomes aware of any failure by GHD to provide services that meet the standard of care established in this Agreement. d. At the request of GHD, Client shall provide GHD with the following information (which shall also be considered “Client Data”) to the extent such information is in Client's possession and is pertinent to the Scope of Work, as determined by GHD:
i. all criteria and full information as to Client's requirements; copies of all design and construction standards which Client will require to be included in GHD's work; copies of Client's standard terms, conditions, and related documents for GHD to include in bidding documents, when applicable; and
ii. any other available information pertinent to the project, including, without limitation, reports and data relative to previous designs or investigations; environmental, geological, and 145
geotechnical conditions of the project site and all surrounding area at or adjacent to the project site; and insofar as such information is not available, Client agrees to pay GHD for the reasonable cost of obtaining the same such information. e. If applicable to the Scope of Work, Client shall be responsible for providing information, to the extent such information is within Client’s possession, (which shall also be considered “Client Data”) regarding the location of all known subsurface structures at the project site including but not limited to pipes, tanks, sewer, and utilities (power, phone, cable, gas, water, etc.). f. Client agrees that GHD may use Client Data to add insight, analytics, and data science to the services and/or to provide or suggest additional solutions or services to Client. Client acknowledges and agrees GHD may store Client Data on a cloud computing service (e.g., Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, etc.) and which may be transmitted to or stored outside the County or origin, subject to applicable laws.
g. Client acknowledges and agrees that GHD may obtain and aggregate technical and other data related to the services that is: (i) is anonymized and presented in a way which does not reveal Client’s identity; and (ii) may be combined with historical or recent data and information of other clients or additional data sources (“Aggregated Data”). Client agrees that all right, title, and interest in Aggregated Data, including all intellectual property rights, are hereby assigned to and owned solely by GHD. GHD may reproduce, distribute, display, make publicly available, and otherwise use the Aggregated Data for any business purpose, during and after the term of this Agreement.

6. Confidentiality.

During the term of this Agreement and for a period of two (2) years thereafter (and in the case of trade secrets, until such time as the trade secret no longer qualifies for protection as such under applicable law). GHD shall not disclose any Confidential Information relating to Client to any third parties other than employees, subcontractors, or agents of GHD without the prior written consent of Client, except as required by applicable law, regulation, or legal process, or as may be required by emergency situations. “Confidential Information” includes, without limitation, whether received from or on behalf of the Client, whether marked or not; (i) any information constituting a trade secret under applicable law, (ii) nontechnical information relating to the past, present or future business affairs of the Client such as pricing, margins, marketing plans and strategies, finances, financial and accounting data and information, suppliers, customers, customer lists, purchasing data, future business plans, (iii) technical information including patent, copyright, trade secret, and other proprietary information. In the event GHD is requested pursuant to, or required by applicable law, regulation, or legal process to disclose any Confidential Information, GHD will notify Client of the circumstances requiring such disclosure and will refrain from such disclosure for the maximum period of time allowed by law so that Client may seek a protective order or other appropriate remedy to protect the Confidential Information. This provision shall not apply to data or information which (i) is or becomes part of the public domain other than as a result of disclosure by GHD; (ii) was acquired by GHD independently from third parties not under any obligation to Client to keep such data and information confidential; (iii) was in GHD’s possession prior to disclosure of the same by Client; or (iv) has been independently developed by GHD, or its employees, subcontractors, or agents.

7. Independent contractor and subcontracting.

The Parties acknowledge and agree that GHD shall be an independent contractor and shall have responsibility for and control over the means of providing the services. GHD shall have the right to use subcontractors as GHD deems necessary to assist in the performance of the services. GHD shall not be required to employ any subcontractor that is unacceptable to GHD.

8. Site access and safety.

Client shall provide right of entry and safe access and necessary permissions for GHD, its representatives, and its subcontractors to perform the services. GHD shall only be responsible for the activities of its own employees and agents on a project site with respect to safety. GHD, its representatives, and its subcontractors will comply with all reasonable known security, health, and safety 146
requirements of the project site owner, as well as those of Client with respect to Client's facilities, which may be imposed upon GHD as a condition of its right of entry. If access to the project site is required to perform the services and such access does not comply with applicable Client approved safety plans, regulations, and/or laws, GHD may, at its sole discretion, suspend services until such violations are remedied.

9. Hazards, materials, and samples.
a. Unless otherwise stated in the Scope of Work, GHD shall have the primary responsibility of determining if known or potential health or safety hazards exist on or near the project site upon which the services are to be performed by GHD or its subcontractors. Client warrants that it will make full and accurate written disclosure as to any hazardous, radioactive, or toxic substance, or any irritant, contaminant, pollutant, or otherwise dangerous substance or condition (“Hazardous Conditions”) which Client knows or has reason to believe exist at the project site prior to the commencement of the services.
b. If Hazardous Conditions are discovered by GHD during the performance of the services which it could not have reasonably discovered prior to the commencement of the services and if the existence of such Hazardous Conditions materially changes the nature or performance of the services or responsibilities at the project site, Client and GHD shall execute an Amendment to address such changes. If the Parties are unable to agree on an Amendment within thirty (30) calendar days, the Agreement may be terminated by GHD in accordance with the termination provisions of this Agreement. The Parties expressly agree that, unless otherwise specified in the Scope of Work, the discovery of the presence of mold, asbestos, or lead-based paint will constitute a changed condition enabling GHD in its sole discretion to terminate its provision of services if GHD and Client are unable to renegotiate the Scope of Work in a timely manner. GHD will notify Client as soon as practicable should GHD encounter unanticipated hazardous or suspected hazardous materials or conditions.
c. GHD and Client recognize and agree that GHD has neither created nor contributed to the existence of any Hazardous Conditions at the project site, and as such, GHD has no responsibility in relation to the presence of any such Hazardous Conditions. Accordingly, in the event of any claim against GHD arising out of any actual or alleged Hazardous Conditions on a project site, Client agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold GHD harmless from such claim(s) against GHD or its employees, agents, directors, officers, or subcontractors, unless such claims arise out of the gross negligence or willful misconduct of GHD. This indemnity obligation shall cover, without limitation, any claims against or liability of GHD in relation to preexisting conditions on the project site, any statutory liability, and/or any strict liability under any federal, state, provincial, and/or local environmental laws alleging or asserting, without limitation, that GHD, by virtue of status as an owner, operator, handler, generator, arranger, transporter, treater, storer, or disposer, is liable for any Hazardous Conditions.
d. In the event GHD performs sampling on behalf of Client, GHD shall preserve such samples obtained from the project site as it deems necessary for the project, but not longer than 45 calendar days after the issuance of any document that includes data obtained from such samples. GHD shall arrange for the disposal of samples containing hazardous materials on behalf of Client, which may consist of returning the samples to the project site, and Client agrees to pay GHD for the cost of returning or disposing of such samples. Samples shall remain the property of Client, and ultimate responsibility for their disposal shall remain with Client. Unless otherwise stated in the Scope of Work, GHD shall not assume title to any samples taken on behalf of Client.

10. Standard of care.

GHD represents that the services shall be performed in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of GHD's profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality. No warranties, guaranties, or representations of any kind, either express or implied, are included or intended by this Agreement or in any proposal, contract, report, opinion, or other document in connection with this project. Upon receipt of notice from Client, GHD shall 147
promptly correct, without additional compensation, any services which fail to conform to the standard of care established in this Section.

11. Indemnity and liability.
a. Subject to the limitations of Section 11(d) and Section 11(e) below, GHD agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Client (including its officers, directors and employees) from and against losses, damages, liabilities, and expenses (including reasonable legal fees, court costs, and costs of investigation) to the proportionate extent caused by: (i) the failure of GHD to comply in material respects with federal, state, provincial and/or local laws and regulations applicable to the services; (ii) a breach by GHD of this Agreement; or (iii) the negligence or willful misconduct on the part of GHD in performing the services.
b. Subject to the limitations of Section 11(d) and Section 11(e) below, Client agrees to indemnify and hold harmless GHD (including its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and the officers, directors, employees, agents, subcontractors, and any successors or assigns) from and against losses, damages, liabilities, and expenses (including reasonable legal fees, court costs, and costs of investigation) to the proportionate extent caused by: (i) a breach by Client of this Agreement; (ii) the negligence or willful misconduct of Client; or (iii) any condition existing at the project site prior to the arrival of GHD of which GHD had no actual knowledge and over which GHD had no control. c. The indemnification commitments in this Agreement do not include a defense obligation by the indemnitor unless such obligation is expressly stated.
d. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED BY NEGLIGENCE, INCLUDING ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR OTHER ACTS; OR FOR ANY DAMAGES BASED IN CONTRACT; OR FOR ANY OTHER CAUSE OF ACTION; GHD'S LIABILITY, INCLUDING THAT OF ITS EMPLOYEES,

AGENTS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND SUBCONTRACTORS, SHALL BE STRICTLY LIMITED TO THE LESSER OF THE AGREEMENT VALUE OR $1,000,000. NOTWITHSTANDING THE PRECEDING SENTENCE, IF THE AGREEMENT VALUE IS LESS THAN $50,000, GHD’S LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED TO $50,000.

CLIENT'S LIABILITY TO GHD (NOT INCLUDING PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS), INCLUDING THAT OF ITS

EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, AND CONTRACTORS, WILL BE LIMITED TO $1,000,000.

THE LIMITATIONS IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL NOT APPLY TO DAMAGE RESULTING FROM THE GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF THE PARTY CAUSING SUCH DAMAGE. e. IN NO EVENT SHALL EITHER PARTY BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR

OTHERWISE FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR PUNITIVE

DAMAGES, AND/OR DAMAGES RESULTING FROM BUSINESS INTERRUPTION OR THE LOSS OF PROFITS, REVENUE, OPPORTUNITY, ANTICIPATED SAVINGS, USE, DATA AND/OR GOODWILL. THIS

MUTUAL WAIVER IS APPLICABLE, WITHOUT LIMITATION, TO ALL DAMAGES CONTEMPLATED IN THIS SECTION 11(E) THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE BE INCLUDED WITHIN A PARTY’S INDEMNIFICATION OBLIGATIONS.

12. Intellectual property.
a. Upon full payment of all amounts properly due under this Agreement, GHD shall assign and transfer to Client all right, title, and interest in and to the Work Product prepared by GHD under this Agreement (the "Deliverables"), and such Deliverables shall become the property of Client.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, GHD shall retain ownership of all pre-existing intellectual property, methodologies, tools, know-how, techniques, and general knowledge developed or acquired by GHD independently of this Agreement or prior to its execution (collectively, "GHD Background IP").

To the extent any GHD Background IP is incorporated into the Deliverables, GHD hereby grants Client, upon full payment of amounts due, a non-exclusive, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free license to use such GHD Background IP solely as embedded in and necessary for Client's use of the Deliverables for the purposes contemplated by the Scope of Work. Prior to full payment, GHD retains all ownership and property interests in the Work Product, and Client shall have no right to use, copy, 148
or distribute the Work Product except with GHD's prior written consent. Any reuse or modification of the Work Product or Deliverables beyond the purposes contemplated by the Scope of Work, or any use of GHD Background IP separate from the Deliverables, without written verification or adaptation by GHD for the specific purpose intended, will be at Client's sole risk and without liability to GHD. b. Client acknowledges that inventions, works, products, software, copyrights, patents, derivative works, trade secrets, trademarks and service marks (including all goodwill), domain names, social media sites, moral rights, publicity rights, and privacy rights and any other materials which were created, conceived, or reduced to practice prior to or independently of this Agreement by GHD, and trade secrets, know how, methodology, and processes of GHD whether or not related to the Scope of Work (hereinafter the “Background IP”) shall remain the property of GHD. To the extent that any Background IP is incorporated into the Work Product and on the condition that Client has fully paid GHD for the Work Product, GHD hereby grants Client a limited, nonexclusive, nontransferable, perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free, paid-up, license to utilize the Background IP solely with respect to the purpose contemplated by the Scope of Work.

13. Termination.
a. Client will have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time with or without cause, based solely on Client's convenience, provided that GHD is provided thirty (30) calendar days advance written notice of the termination. Client shall pay GHD for all services performed and expenses incurred prior to the effective date of termination, including but not limited to costs to cancel or suspend subcontracts, and other related close-out costs.
b. GHD may terminate its obligations pursuant to this Agreement under the following circumstances:
i. In the event of a breach or default of any obligation by Client, except non-payment of disputed amounts, or as otherwise provided for in this Agreement; ii. If GHD is unable, for any reason beyond its control, including, without limitation, a Force Majeure event, to perform its obligations pursuant to this Agreement in a safe, lawful, or professional manner; or
iii. In the event Client (i) ceases to do business in the normal course, (ii) becomes or is declared insolvent or bankrupt, (iii) is the subject of any proceeding related to its liquidation or insolvency or (iv) makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. c. If either circumstance described in Section 13(b)(i) or 13(b)(ii) above occurs, GHD shall notify Client of pertinent conditions and recommend appropriate action. If within thirty (30) calendar days of such notice the circumstances described in Section 13(b)(i) or 13(b)(ii) above have not been remedied or cured, GHD may terminate this Agreement hereunder. In the event of termination, GHD shall be paid for services performed prior to the effective date of termination plus reasonable termination expenses.

14. Dispute resolution.

Both Parties agree in good faith to attempt to resolve amicably, without litigation, any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the work to be performed hereunder. Following notification of a dispute, the Parties shall have five (5) business days from the date of notification to begin negotiations and fifteen (15) business days from the notification date to complete negotiations, unless otherwise agreed in writing. If any dispute cannot be resolved through direct discussions, the Parties agree to endeavor to settle the dispute by mediation. The Parties shall have forty-five (45) business days within which to commence the first mediation session following the conclusion of their good faith negotiations or expiration of the time within which to negotiate. Either Party may make a written demand for mediation, which demand shall specify the facts of the dispute. The matter shall be submitted to a mediator mutually selected by the Parties. The mediator shall hear the matter and provide an informal nonbinding opinion and advice in order to help resolve the dispute. The mediator's fee shall be shared equally by the Parties.

If the dispute is not resolved through mediation, the matter may be submitted to the judicial system in the courts of general jurisdiction where the project site is located. IN ANY ACTION, SUIT, OR PROCEEDING

BROUGHT BY ANY PARTY AGAINST ANY OTHER PARTY, THE PARTIES EACH KNOWINGLY AND 149

INTENTIONALLY, TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, HEREBY ABSOLUTELY, UNCONDITIONALLY, IRREVOCABLY AND EXPRESSLY WAIVES FOREVER TRIAL BY JURY. For the avoidance of doubt, GHD’s statutory or other right, if any, to file a lien for Client’s nonpayment will not be conditioned upon or subject to the dispute resolution rules contained in this Section.

15. Records and audit.

Client shall have the right, upon reasonable advance notice, to audit records associated with the services performed and the charges invoiced to Client pursuant to this Agreement. Client’s right to audit shall not extend to proprietary information or the profit margin and composition of GHD’s fees, except for that portion of the services priced on a cost reimbursable basis. Such records shall be open to inspection and audit by authorized representatives of Client during normal business hours at the place where such records are kept until the completion or termination of this Agreement and for a minimum of 3 years thereafter. GHD shall require its subcontractors to similarly maintain records and to permit the inspection and audit of such records by Client upon similar conditions and time periods.

16. Force majeure.

If either Party is rendered unable, wholly or in part, by Force Majeure (as defined below) to carry out its obligations under this Agreement, other than the obligation to pay funds due, that Party shall give the other Party prompt written notice of the Force Majeure with reasonably full particulars thereof.

Thereupon, the obligations of the Party giving notice, so far as they are affected by the Force Majeure, shall be suspended during, but not longer than, the continuance of the Force Majeure. The affected Party shall use all reasonable diligence to remove or remedy the Force Majeure as quickly as possible, except that this requirement shall not require the settlement of strikes, lockouts, or other labor difficulty. The term "Force Majeure" as used in this Agreement shall mean an Act of God, natural events, labor, civil or industrial disturbance, pandemic, governmental or legislative actions, or orders of any court or agency having jurisdiction of the Party’s actions, unavailability of equipment, personnel, or information, and any other cause which is not reasonably within the control of the Party claiming suspension.

17. Notice.

Notices pertaining to this Agreement shall be in writing and deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person, by prepaid overnight express delivery service, or by registered or certified mail with postage prepaid and return receipt requested, or when sent by email and upon the receipt by the sending party of written confirmation by the receiving party, provided, however, that an automated email confirmation of delivery or read receipt shall not constitute such confirmation, to the respective Party’s authorized representative identified below, or at such other address as may be changed by either Party by giving written notice thereof to the other:

GHD Client
Attention: [Enter name] City Manager
Address: [Enter address] 305 N. Mt Shasta Boulevard
Email: [Enter email address] [email protected] Telephone: [Enter telephone number] 530 926-7519

18. Miscellaneous.
a. Third party beneficiaries.

This Agreement does not and is not intended to confer any rights or remedies upon any person other than the Parties.
b. Municipal advisor rule.

GHD’s services do not include serving as a “municipal advisor” or advising Client or any other entity in any manner regarding municipal financial products or municipal securities. c. Reliance.

GHD’s Work Product shall not be relied upon, and Client shall not allow GHD’s Work Product to be relied upon, by any third party entity or person without GHD’s prior written consent, which shall be 150
granted only if such third party requests and is granted the right to rely prior to the commencement of the services and such third party has (i) executed GHD’s standard form reliance agreement and (ii) paid any fees specified in the Scope of Work. Client will indemnify and hold harmless GHD against any claim by, or liability to, a third party arising from reliance on the Work Product in violation of this Section.
d. Waiver.

No failure or delay by either Party in exercising any right, power, or privilege hereunder will operate as a waiver thereof, nor will any single or partial exercise of any such right, power, or privilege preclude any other or further exercise thereof.
e. Successors and assignment.

Neither Party may assign, sublet, or transfer any rights under or interest (including, but without limitation, monies that are due or may become due) in this Agreement without the written consent of the other Party. The obligations of the Parties under this Agreement will not terminate upon any attempted assignment that violates this Agreement. Any assignment or attempted assignment violating this Agreement is void. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section, Client hereby agrees that this Agreement may be assigned to another entity within the GHD group of companies that will be directly or indirectly wholly owned by GHD Group Limited (a "Related Entity").

Any such Related Entity shall assume all GHD's liabilities, duties, and obligations in, to, and under this Agreement, which assignment may be effected without any prior notice or action on the part of GHD provided that GHD shall give notice of such assignment to Client as soon as reasonably practicable. Client agrees to execute and deliver any documents as may be reasonably requested to evidence consent to such assignment.
f. Conflict of Interest.

GHD and its Related Entities are engaged by a wide variety of clients, some of whom may be competitors, suppliers, or customers of Client, or other parties with conflicting legal and/or business interests to Client, including, without limitation, in relation to the services provided to Client by GHD.

In accordance with applicable professional standards, and except as set out below, GHD will not use any confidential information regarding Client in connection with its engagements with other clients and will establish safeguards to manage conflicts, which may include, in GHD’s reasonable discretion, the use of separate personnel and data access controls. Client further agrees that GHD may, in its sole discretion, disclose the fact or general nature of its engagement for Client to (i) internally to Related Entities in order to check against potential conflicts of interest, and (ii) to the extent reasonably required in order to obtain the consent of another entity or individual for GHD to act for such entity or individual, or for Client, in connection with this Agreement or any future engagement.
g. Severability and survival.

The Parties agree that, in the event one or more of the provisions or a portion thereof of this Agreement should be declared void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall not be affected and shall continue in full force and effect. The Parties also agree that the obligations and representations which by their nature are intended to survive the termination of this Agreement, including but not limited to those pertaining to indemnification, limitations of liability, and intellectual property, shall survive the termination of this Agreement. h. Governing law.

This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State in which the project site is located. i. No Construction or adverse inference.

The Parties have been provided an opportunity to negotiate the terms of this Agreement. The terms and conditions contained therein shall not be construed in favor of or against any Party. j. Authority to sign.
151
Each of the persons signing below on behalf of any Party hereby represents and warrants that they are signing with full and complete authority to bind the Party on whose behalf they are signing to every term of this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and which together will constitute one and the same instrument. k. Entire agreement.

This Agreement, including all attached Exhibits and documents referenced in those Exhibits, constitute the complete and final agreement between GHD and Client regarding the subject matter hereof. This Agreement supersedes all prior or contemporaneous communications, representations, undertakings, or understandings of the Parties, whether oral or written, relating to the services and subject matter of this Agreement, except to the extent that such prior communications have explicitly been incorporated into the Agreement or one of the attached Exhibits. Modifications of this Agreement shall not be binding unless made in writing and signed by an authorized representative of each Party.

In witness whereof, GHD and Client have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date.

GHD
[Select item]
Print name
Print title
Client
Todd Juhasz
City Manager, Mt Shasta, CA
152