Cities Index.
Item 6.1_Correspondence (Batch 1)

Mountain View City Council
November 1, 2022

Document
Item 6.1_Correspondence (Batch 1)
Meeting
November 1, 2022
Body
Mountain View City Council
Original file
163 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on mountainview.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

From: Serge Bonte
To: City Council
Cc: Shrivastava, Aarti; Lee, Danielle; Attinger, Steve
Subject: re: 11/1/22 Meeting - Agenda Item 6.1 Public Hearing on Reach Code Date: Thursday, October 27, 2022 7:14:18 PM
CAUTION: EXTERNAL EMAIL - Ensure you trust this email before clicking on any links or attachments.

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:

I didn't get a chance to attend the 10/24/22 meeting, my apologies

if my comments were raised
and answered during that meeting.

1. re: all new Housing
I don't really understand why nor how the wording

for PV and battery differs between CA
2022 code, SVCE proposal and Mountain View ordinance.
"CA 2022 Code:

- PV per 110.10(b)-(e) & battery storage per 150.0(s)
SVCE:

- PV installation & battery storage installation per 2022 CA Codes (Energy and Green)
Mountain View Reach Code:

- PV installation prewired to accommodate an all-electric building (100% kWh consumption) & battery storage installation per 2022 CA Codes (Energy and Green)"
Since all 3 seem to defer to the CA 2022 code, why the need for all that extra language. Also, I'm not sure 100%Kwh consumption is doable for all types of housing. Multifamily Housing in particular where PV alone won't suffice even if using 100% of the roof area -which is unlikely in practice and would come at the expense of roof gardens-.

2. re: EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, DUPLEX & TOWNHOMES WITH

ATTACHED PRIVATE GARAGES ,
Maybe it's an oxford comma type of issue, but is there any requirement when a single family home has a detached garage? -My home on has a detached garage-.

3. re:

EXISTING MULTI-FAMILY BUILDINGS

As a condo owner in Mountain View, I think you are grossly underestimating the practical complexities of providing EV capabilities. Unlike with my single family home, I can't just go upgrade my panels and

provide wire/outlet inked to my own PG&E account. HOA would need to be involved and I have no idea how EV charging in a common space would be tied to my tenant's PG&E account. I think

you should delay that EV requirement for existing multi- family buildings. SVCE and the City should also research and provide a blueprint for existing Multifamily buildings. In other words, show us how it can be done before mandating it.

Sincerely,

Serge Bonte

← All documents from this meeting