cinema complex), 223 Moffett Blvd ( multi -tenant retail), 2105 Old Middlefield ( shopping center), and 55 Fairchild Drive ( hotel). This demonstrates the feasibility of redevelopment of these sites, regardless of their existing uses.
Programmatic Response
In addition to the site characteristics described above that mirror the conditions found in recent City redevelopment and Pipeline projects, several Housing Element programs have been established to facilitate development of the Opportunity Sites. Applicable programs are listed below. Refer to Chapter 3: Housing Plan, for full program descriptions.
Program 1. 7 Monitor and Promote Accessory Dwelling Units, Junior Accessor Dwelling Units and SB9 Developments
Program 2. 2 Pilot ADU & SB9 Financial Incentives Program Program 4. 5 Partnerships with Affordable Housing Developers Unit Capacity by Project Type
The following are summaries of the key findings for each of the project types: Pipeline Projects and Opportunity Sites, including Opportunity Sites that do not and do require rezonings and ADUs. Refer to Table 49 for the sites inventory summary and Figure 95 for an overview map of all sites in the inventory ( ADUs excluded). This inventory was developed based on HCD requirements for locations and affordability levels as well as City goals focusing on sites that have residential capacity under the current zoning and areas that have undergone robust community engagement, such as Precise Plan areas. Sites that would cause high residential displacement were avoided.
A rowhouse development in the South Whisman A multifamily development in the San Antonio neighborhood. mixed -use neighborhood.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis and Inventory 312 Resolution No. 18781
Figure 95: Housing Sites Overview
ctsHousingElemen:\
Housing_
Element\
fl3_
M
XDs_
P
0 4, 000
NASA Ames
Federal)
NASAAAm s
Federal)
RQI ' ' Moffett/ Whisman Road
0 , 44,
Central Neighborhoods
Springer/ Cuesta/ Phyllis
r=
Grant Road/ Sylvan Park
Levin Ave
Bryant Ave
I City of Mountain View
Q Neighborhoods
Pipeline Projects
Approved/ Under
Construction - 100%
Affordable
Approved/ Under
Construction - Mixed
Affordability
Proposed Projects
Rezoning Required
Proposed Projects - No
Rezoning Required
Opportunity Sites
Developable, Underutilized
Opportunity Sites
Rezone Area for General
Plan Village Center Site
Rezone Area for El
Camino Real Village
Center Site
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis and Inventory 313 Resolution No. 18781
Pipeline Projects
Pipeline Projects include those that have been approved, permitted, or received a final certificate of occupancy since the beginning of the RHNA projection period ( which started on June 30, 2022).
Based on HCD guidance, these Pipeline Projects are not considered sites in the inventory; however, these sites may be credited toward meeting the RHNA allocation based on the affordability and unit count of the development. Refer to Figure 96 for all Pipeline Project locations, including approved, under construction, and proposed projects.
Approved/ Under Construction: Pipeline Projects include a subcategory of projects that have been approved or are under construction and will receive a final certificate of occupancy after the beginning of the RHNA projection period, making these projects eligible to be counted towards the 6th cycle RHNA. Projects in this category conform with the current General Plan and zoning, therefore no rezoning is required. A total of 3, 765 units are listed in Table 52, which summarizes those projects that are approved or are under construction, by address and site status. Affordability assumptions are based on approved entitlements and include deed -restricted units per BMR requirements. Projects under construction that will receive a final certificate of occupancy during the projection period include: 1001 N Shoreline Boulevard, 1255 Pear Avenue, 777 W Middlefield Road, 851- 853 Sierra Vista Avenue, 950 W El Camino Real, 1720 Villa Street, 2580- 2590 California Street, and 555-557 E Evelyn Avenue. Remaining projects in this subcategory have been approved and are listed as such in Table 52. Expected completion dates are provided in this table as well.
Approved/ under construction projects are made up of 53 sites on parcels totaling approximately 81 acres, as shown in Figure 96. While some neighborhoods have more approved/ under construction project units than others, Table 53 demonstrates how units at varied income levels appear and are distributed in each of the City' s recognized neighborhoods. Approximately 55 percent of approved/ under construction projects are located in the City' s Precise Plan areas, including Downtown, East Whisman, El Camino Real, San Antonio, Villa Mariposa, and North Bayshore, where robust community engagement has already occurred to vet areas that would support residential development. Refer to Table 54.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis and Inventory 314 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
376
of
483 Table 52: Approved/ Under Construction Pipeline Projects Summary by Project Address Lower
Income
U nits
Moderate
Income
U nits
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
Capacity
Expected
Completion
Date ( Year)
Projects that
contain Deed -
restricted
1001 N Shoreline Blvd
1 100 La Avenida
1255 Pear Ave
1313 and 1347 W El
Camino Real
1411- 1495 W El Camino
0 5 48 53 2024 Yes
Real
1720 Villa Street 3 0 204 207 2023 Yes
20 20 263 303
100 0 0 100
0 0 220 220
2 0 22 24
2024 (apt)
2025( condos)
2024
Yes
Yes
2024 Yes
2024 Yes
1958 Latham St 0 0 6 6 2024 No
198 Easy Street 0 0 4 4 2024 No
2580- 2590 California Street 14 18 600 632 2023 Yes
2645 Fayette Drive 5 0 33 38 2025 Yes
334 San Antonio Rd 10 3 49 62 2026 Yes
i 400 Logue Avenue 24 38 346 408 2025 Yes
555 East Evelyn Avenue 0 0 471 471 2023 No
555 W Middlefield Rd 32 16 275 323 2029 Yes
570 Rengstorff Ave 0 0 15 15 2024 No
Under
Construction
Approved
Under
Construction
Approved
Approved
Under
Construction
Approved
Approved
Under
Construction
Approved
Approved
Approved
Under
Construction
Approved
Approved
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix t. mousing sites Analysis and Inventory Resolution
No.
18781
Page
377
of
483
Moderate
Income
U nits
01 Escuela Ave
773 Cuesta Drive
L. 77 W Middlefield Rd
11- 828- 836 Sierra Vista Ave
and 1975/ 1979 Colony St
1 0 14 15 2024 Yes
851- 853 Sierra Vista
0 0 6 6 2023 No
Avenue
901 E El Camino Real 45 0 0 45 2023 Yes
950 West El Camino Real 70 0 1 71 2022 ( August) Yes
Above
Moderate
Income
Total
Ca acity
Expected
Completion
Date ( Year)
Projects that
contain Deed -
restricted
Affordable Lower
2 2 • 21 25
0 0 1 3 3
0 144 364 508
2025
2024
2025
Yes
No
Yes
City Lot 12 ( Bryant St) 119 1 0 120 2026 Yes
1265 Montecito Ave 84 1 0 85 2026 Yes
730 Central Ave 2 0 19 21 2026 Yes
Grand Total 533 248 2, 984 3, 765
Approved
Approved
Under
Construction
Approved
Under
Construction
Approved
Under
Construction
Approved
Approved
Approved
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis and Inventory 316 Resolution No. 18781
Table 53: Approved/ Under Construction Pipeline Projects Summarized by Neighborhood
Sum of Lower
Income Units
Sum of
Moderate
Income Units
Moderate
Income Units
Sum of Net
New Units
Central Neighborhoods
Grant Road/ Sylvan Park
Moffett/ Whisman Road
Monta Loma/ Farley/ Rock Street
North Bayshore
San Antonio/ Rengstorff
Springer/ Cuesta/ Phyllis
Grand Total
194
45 78
85 100
29 2
533
3 0
218
1 0
21 5
248
I
226
471
1, 271
20 220
703
73 2, 984
423
516
1, 567 mil
106 J
320
753
80 3, 765
Table 54: Approved/ Under Construction Pipeline Projects Summarized by Precise Plan
Downtown 119 1 0 120
East Whisman 24 38 346 408
El Camino Real 119 7 92 218
North Bayshore 100 0 220 320
San Antonio 29 21 682 732
Villa Mariposa 3 0 204 207
Not in Precise Plan 139 181 1, 440 1, 760
Grand Total 533 248 2, 984 3, 765
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis and Inventory 317 Resolution No. 18781
Figure 96: Pipeline Projects
Charleston Rd. \_
Monts Loma/ Farley/ Rock Street
5 4, 000
Feet
E
Springer/ C uesta/ Phyl lis
NASA Ames
Federal)
NASA Ames
Federal)
I City of Mountain View
Q Neighborhoods
Pipeline Projects
Approved/ Under Construction
100% Affordable
Approved/ Under Construction
Mixed Affordability
Proposed Projects - Rezoning
Required
Proposed Projects - No
Rezoning Required
Moffett/whismar.
Grant Road/ Sylvan Park
Levin Ave
Bryant Ave
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis and Inventory 318 Resolution No. 18781
Proposed Projects: Proposed Projects are Pipeline Projects that are seeking entitlements, including those where formal applications or pre -applications have been submitted. Building permits or final certificates of occupancy for these Proposed Projects are expected to be issued in the 6th cycle, making these projects eligible to be counted towards the 6th cycle RHNA. There are 14 parcels, totaling approximately 24.5 acres, that yield 2, 021 units identified as Proposed Projects in the sites inventory. With the exception of 1020 and 1040 Terra Bella Avenue, 1012 Linda Vista, and 87 E Evelyn Ave, all Proposed Projects do not require rezoning as these sites conform to the current General Plan and zoning. Refer to Table 55 for all Proposed Projects.
Table 55: Proposed Pipeline Projects Summary by Address ite Address/
ntersection
Lower
Income
Capacity
Moderate
Income
Capacity
Above
Moderate
Income
Capacity
Total
Capacity
Expected
Entitlement
Date
Year)
contain
Deed -
restricted
Affordable
Lower
Income
Units
1332 Park Dr
615- 749 W El
Camino Real
89 W El Camino
Real
o
t
33 0
61 0
918 Rich Ave 3 1
96 W El Camino
70 0 0 70
Real
320 Logue Ave 30 25 309 364 2023 Yes
685 E Middlefield
138 0 690 828 2023 Yes
Rd
266/ 272 Tyrella
6 0 36 42 2024 Yes
Ave
1012 Linda Vista 69 0 0 69 2023 Yes
87 E Evelyn
150 0 0 150 2024 Yes
Avenue
1020 & 1040 Terra
108 0 0 108 2023 Yes
Bella Ave
Grand Total 668 26 1, 327 2, 021
21 266
0 1 2
1 299
2023
2023
No
Yes
61 2024 Yes
24 28 2023 Yes
2024 Yes
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Lower and moderate -income units among the Proposed Projects are based on submitted applications, site capacities and other available information. While the ultimate number of units may change a small amount based on unforeseen circumstances, these projects are committed to very nearly the identified number of lower- and moderate -income units based on the City' s BMR requirements and current Council goals.
Proposed Projects where no rezoning is required are present throughout the City. Typical review times and times between building permit and construction are no more than five years (see Appendix D: Housing Constraints). Therefore, other than projects without a development agreement or projects that are dependent on City funding and coordination, it is reasonable for these projects to start construction by 2031.
Table 56: Proposed Pipeline Projects Summarized by Neighborhood Central Neighborhoods
Grant Road/ Sylvan Park
Moffett/ Whisman Road
Springer/ Cuesta/ Phyllis
Grand Total
70 150
351
97 668
0 0
25 1
26 0
0 1, 035
292
1, 327
70 150
1, 411
390
2, 021
Table 57: Proposed Pipeline Projects Summarized by Precise Plan East Whisman
El Camino Real
Not in Precise Plan
Grand Total
168 25 999 1, 192
164 0 266 430
336 1 62 399
668 26 1, 327 2, 021
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Proposed Projects - Rezoning Required ( Affordable Development): Proposed Project sites identified within this subcategory require rezoning, which, except for 1020 & 1040 Terra Bella Avenue, were completed concurrently with the Housing Element and approved on February 14, 2023. They are sites that the City or affordable housing developers have acquired with the intent to redevelop, as shown in Table 58. Where the City is proactively rezoning, applicants will likely use the SB 35 process and the City and developer can be confident that they will proceed within the timeframe of the Housing Element. For 1020 & 1040 Terra Bella Avenue, the rezoning process is occurring with the development approvals, which is tentatively scheduled for March 28, 2023. The number of units assumed on each site are based on discussions with the developers and are corroborated by the capacities of nearby and similar affordable housing developments. Sites in this subcategory include six sites on parcels totaling approximately 7. 4 acres. Refer to Figure 97.
Table 58: Proposed Pipeline Projects ( Rezoning) Summarized by Project Address 1020 & 1040 Terra Bella
Ave
87 E Evelyn Avenue
1012 Linda Vista
Grand Total
108 0 0 108
150 0 0 150
69 0 0 69
327 0 0 327
Several of the Proposed Projects are 100 percent affordable developments. While these projects are at different points in the review process, all are expected to be developed within the 6th Cycle, even though they depend on City action, including funding, to proceed. Table 59 shows the status and steps necessary to bring these developments to fruition. A tentative timeline is also shown. In addition, Programs 1. 2, 1.4, 1. 7, 1. 9, 1. 10, 2. 1, 2. 2, 4. 1, 4. 2, 4. 3, 4. 4, and 4. 5. ensure that these projects will continue to move forward.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution
No.
18781
Page
383
of
483
Table 59: Status and Expected Timeline of Major Proposed Affordable Developments Ty Subsidy
Expected
Affordable
U nits
Estimated
Construction planning en i lement, bui ding
89 W. El
Camino Real
96 W. El
Camino Real
First
Community
Housing
Danco
pending NOFA
committee
pending NOFA
committee
Plan development and NOFA Process — less
than 1 year
2024/ 2025 • Entitlement ( SB 35) — less than 1 year
Building Permit and secure non -City funding —
approx. 1 year
Plan development and NOFA Process — less
than 1 year T2024/2025 • Entitlement ( SB 35) — less than 1 year Building Permit and secure non -City funding —
approx. 1 year
Plan development, rezoning and NOFA
1020 Terra Bella Process — less than 1 year
Avenue
Alta $ 13. 5 million 108 2023/ 2024
Building Permit and secure non -City funding —
approx. 1 year
87 E. Evelyn TBD pending 150 2025/ 2026 • City -leased with intent to own & will be Avenue development rezoned with Housing Element Update
agreement • Select developer— less than 1 year
Plan preparation & funding—approx. 1 year
Entitlement ( SB 35) — less than 1 year
Building Permit and secure non -City funding —
approx. 1 year
1012 Linda Alta pending NOFA 69 2024/ 2025 • Will be rezoned with Housing Element Update Vista Avenue committee • Plan development and NOFA Process — less than 1 year
Entitlement ( SB 35) — less than 1 year
Building Permit and secure non -City funding —
approx. 1 year
Source: City of Mountain View, 2022.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Developable, Underutilized Opportunity Sites
These sites were filtered and selected as described in the " Site Selection Process" section, and will support multi -family housing at a minimum density of 30 dwelling units per acre. Almost all of these sites ( 95 percent) are within the recently updated Precise Plans for Downtown, East Whisman, El Camino Real, Evandale, Grant -Phyllis, North Bayshore, and San Antonio, which are well distributed throughout the City as illustrated in Figure 97. As shown in Table 60 and Table 61, the Opportunity Sites identified will provide capacity to develop at least 10,485 units across all City neighborhoods, within seven Precise Plans.
Nineteen Opportunity Sites occur in two master plans involving long, multi -year development agreements: Middlefield Park ( East Whisman Precise Plan) and North Bayshore. These master plans are large, complex, multi -year development proposals initiated by the property owner. They are zoning -compliant and do not require legislative approvals. Applications have been submitted for these Master Plans which include the proposed housing units as described below. Both plans are multi -year developments and will provide a combination of affordable and market -rate housing. The City is not taking credit for 100 percent of the build -out of the Master Plans ( only the portion reasonably expected to occur within an 8-year period or by 2031). Refer to the City of Mountain View homepage at www. mountainview. gov for more information on these master plans. For more details on the unit distribution of Proposed Projects, refer to Table 55 and Table 56.
North Bayshore Master Plan: A formal application for this Proposed Project was submitted in September 2021. It includes a Development Agreement for 30 years which totals 7, 000 units over that time. As of January 1, 2023, the application proposes approximately 534 lower -income units, 140 moderate - income units and 2, 671 above - moderate - income units for the first two phases of the eight -phase plan. This is the amount assumed during the 2023- 2031 planning period, and represents less than half of the anticipated units the project that is counted for this cycle. This is reasonable because this Master Plan and Development Agreement includes a phasing plan that requires construction of residential early in the entitlement period. In addition, the moderate -income units are conservatively not counted, because they are not required to meet the 15% minimum requirement. The following is the anticipated timeline for development of the affordable units:
o Land dedication anticipated in Master Plan— Phase 1 by 2026; Phase 2 tentatively by 2029
o Start construction within two years from land dedication Middlefield Park Master Plan: A formal application for this Proposed Project was submitted in September 2020 and a 20- year Development Agreement has been approved, including 1,900 total units. The approved plan includes 338 to 380 lower -income units and 850 above -moderate income units in the first phase of the four -phase plan. This is the portion of the units expected to be built within the 8 year planning period. This is reasonable because this Master Plan and Development Agreement includes a phasing plan that requires construction of residential early in the entitlement period. The following is the anticipated timeline for development of the affordable units:
o Land dedication anticipated in Master Plan— 3 years
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
o City to select nonprofit developer(s)— approximately 1 year o Plan preparation & funding — less than 1 year
o Entitlement ( SB 35) — less than 1 year
o Building Permit — 6- 9 months for each site
Program 4. 5 commits to facilitating and moving quickly on the development of the affordable units in these projects, which are provided as dedicated land, as soon as it is dedicated to the City.
Table 60: Opportunity Sites Summary by Neighborhood
Central Neighborhoods
Grant Road/ Sylvan Park
Moffett/ Whisman Road
Monta Loma/ Farley/ Rock
Street
North Bayshore
San Antonio/ Rengstorff
Springer/ Cuesta/ Phyllis
Grand Total
58 141 0 199
445 69 0 514
1, 567 612 1, 041 3, 220
66 106 0 172
1, 059
536
369
4, 100
192
530
223
1, 873
3, 471 4, 722
0 1, 066
0 592
4, 512 10, 485
Table 61: Opportunity Sites Summary by Precise Plan
Downtown
East Whisman
El Camino Real
Evandale
Grant- Phyllis
North Bayshore
San Antonio
Not in Precise Plan
Grand Total
0 1, 485
848
0 201
1, 059
191
316
4, 100
8 396
736
136
79 192
119
207
1, 873
0 8
1, 041 2, 922
0 1, 584
0 136
0 280
3, 471 4, 722
0 310
0 523
4, 512 10, 485
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Figure 97: Summary of Opportunity Sites
North Bayshore
Charleston Rd
Monta Loma/ Farley/ Rock Street
ate
a/e
evey m
Ra
4A —
l
Z
San Antonio/ Rengstorff
4, 000
Feet
Central Neighborhoods
Qe
a
E
Springer/ Cuesta/ Phyllis
NASA Ames
Federal)
NASA Ames
Federal)
I City of Mountain View
Q Neighborhoods
Opportunity Sites
Developable, Underutilized
Opportunity Sites
Rezone Area for General
Plan Village Center Site
Rezone Area for El Camino
Real Village Center Site
MoffettiWhisman Road
Grant Road/ Sylvan Park
Levin Ave
Bryant Ave
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis 325 Resolution No. 18781
Rezoned Opportunity Sites
Some Opportunity Sites were rezoned as a result of stakeholder input that was gathered during the development of the sites inventory process. Many of these Opportunity Sites have been rezoned concurrent with this Housing Element Update before or just after the beginning of the 6th cycle.
These rezonings include the following:
Implementing General Plan Village Center uses and standards at existing underutilized shopping centers throughout the City ( including south of El Camino Real where the highest opportunity neighborhoods are located) - Adopted February 14, 2023 (January 24, 2023 for Grant Park Plaza);
Removing the requirement to obtain legislative approvals in order to build at the highest densities along El Camino Real - Adopted January 24, 2023; Two sites, 57 and 67 E Evelyn Avenue, that were purchased by affordable housing developers with the intent to develop lower -income units on these parcels within the planning period - Adopted February 14, 2023; and
Rezonings included in Program 1. 1: Nine sites within the Moffett/ Whisman Road neighborhood and one site ( 1702 Miramonte Ave) in the Springer/ Cuesta/ Phyllis neighborhood that will be rezoned. These sites are not needed to meet a RHNA shortfall and there is sufficient buffer at all income levels within the City' s sites inventory. - currently unscheduled but targeted for completion by December 31, 2024.
Many of these sites align with a variety of the evaluation criteria that make them ideal candidates for residential development given their proximity to services, goods, amenities, and transit.
Opportunity Sites that have been rezoned prior to the start of the planning period or will be rezoned include a total of 37 parcels and yield 1, 467 units total. As mentioned above, none of these sites are needed to meet a lower -income RHNA shortfall as of January 31, 2023. Refer to Table 62 and Figure
97. DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Table 62: Rezoned Opportunity Site Summarized by Designation Opportunity sites rezoned as
of January 31, 2023
Sum of
Moderate
Income
Ut: ts
610 311 0 921
r
Opportunity Sites rezoned as
February 14, 2023 250 65 0 315
Opportunity Sites that require
future rezoning 0 231 0 231
Grand Total 860 607 0
None of these rezoning sites are needed to meet a lower -income RHNA shortfall. 1, 467
Accessory Dwelling Unit
Accessory dwelling unit is a subcategory under the Opportunity Sites project type. An evaluation was conducted to determine the projected number of ADUs to be built within the planning period.
Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units are small, self-contained dwelling units that provide a kitchen, bathroom, and sleeping area. The unit can be attached to the main home with a separate entrance or can be a small, detached unit in the rear yard or above a garage ( Mountain View Ordinance Section 36. 12. 60). Because of their small size ( between 500 to 1, 000 square feet), ADUs typically rent for less than apartments and can provide affordable rental options for smaller households, as well as affordable housing options for extended family. Consistent with State law, the City' s zoning permits one ADU and one JADU per parcel within single family residential zoning, and additional units within multi -family residential zoning. HCD guidance suggests that jurisdictions can assume that ADUs and JADUs continue to develop at the same pace that has occurred over the last three years.
Table 63: Accessory Dwelling Units Permitted in Prior Housing Element Cycle ADUs
Permitted
18 31 42 91
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
The City issued a total of 91 ADU permits combined in 2020, 2021, and 2022, as shown in Table 63.
This averages approximately 30. 33 ADU permits per year ( 91 permits divided by 3 years). Multiply this average, 30. 33 ADUs, by the eight -year planning period, for a total of 243 ADUs projected over the 6th Cycle.
The affordability assumption for ADUs in the City is based on an ABAG regional analysis of existing ADUs in the region. The results of this analysis determined that the following affordability assumptions for ADUs in the ABAG region are as follows: 30 percent of ADUs to very low income, 30 percent to low-income households, 30 percent to moderate -income households, and 10 percent to above -moderate -income households. Based on this allocation, which has been adopted by many other ABAG jurisdictions for their ADU affordability assumptions for this 6th cycle, the City of Mountain View projects 73 very low income ADUs, 73 low-income ADUs, 73 moderate -income ADUs, and 24 above -moderate -income ADUs. Refer to Table 64. Furthermore, a number of Housing Element programs have been created to promote the development of ADUs, including those below.
Refer to Chapter 3: Housing Plan for more details.
Housing Element Program 1. 7: Monitor and Promote Accessory Dwelling Units, Junior Accessory Dwelling Units, and SB9 Developments
Housing Element Program 2. 2: Pilot ADU & SB9 Financial Incentives Program Table 64: Accessory Dwelling Units Projected Over the Planning Period Total ADUs 73 73 73 24
Percentages 30% 30% 30% 10%
243
100%
Source: ABAG. September 8, 2021. Draft Affordability of Accessory Dwelling Units. http:// 21 elements. com/ documentsmainmenu3/ housing- elements/ rhna- 6- 2022- 2030/ 1327- draft- adu- affordability- report- sep- 8- 2021- 1 / file Evaluation of Sites Inventory Through the Lens of AFFH
AB 686 (Santiago) created a new requirement for local jurisdictions to evaluate their Housing Element sites inventories through the lens of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. The law requires that the site inventory be used to identify sites throughout the community, consistent with the local jurisdiction' s duty to affirmatively further fair housing. HCD' s guidance on implementation of the requirement for the sites inventory analysis states that it should address:
Improved Conditions: A discussion of how the sites are identified in a manner that better integrates the community with a consideration for the historical patterns and trends, number of existing households, the magnitude ( e. g., number of units) of the RHNA by income group and impacts on patterns of socio- economic and racial concentrations.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Exacerbated Conditions: Similar to above, an explanation of identified sites relative to the impact on existing patterns of segregation and number of households relative to the magnitude ( e. g., number of units) of the RHNA by income group.
Isolation of the RHNA: An evaluation of whether the RHNA by income group is concentrated in areas of the community.
Local Data and Knowledge: A consideration of current, planned and past developments, investment, policies, practices, demographic trends, public comment and other factors.
Other Relevant Factors: Any other factors that influence the impacts of the identification of sites to accommodate the regional housing need on socio- economic patterns and segregation.
Overall, the Sites Inventory supports the City' s efforts to affirmatively further fair housing through the Housing Element Update process. The following discussion evaluates how the housing sites inventory for the 2023 to 2031 Housing Element relates to various measures of affirmatively furthering fair housing.
Racially and Ethnically Concentrate+ I Areas of Poverty ( R/ ECAPs) and Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence
Mountain View does not have any areas that qualify as R/ ECAPS; thus, there is no concern about the distribution of lower -income RHNA sites potentially exacerbating R/ ECAPS.
While Mountain View also does not have any areas that meet the technical definition for RCAAs, Figure 64 in Appendix B shows that most of the Census Tracts in Mountain View with high proportions of White residents also have relatively high median household incomes. The following subsection evaluates the site inventory in relation to areas with concentrations of White residents.
The findings from that subsection also generally apply to the distribution of sites in relation to areas that have both a high concentration of White residents and a high median household income.
Areas with Concentrations of Minority Residents ( percent of Population Non -White) Mountain View is 60 percent non- White, and as a result most Mountain View residents live in neighborhoods with a majority non-White population. Within Mountain View there is some variation in the racial and ethnic mix between neighborhoods; Census Block Groups in Mountain View range from 39 percent non-White to 77 percent non-White, with Latino residents and Asian residents constituting a significant share of residents in some areas of the City. These trends are discussed in more detail in the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Section shown in Appendix B.
While lower -income RHNA sites are not found on every City block, they are distributed across all seven City neighborhoods. Table 65 provides an analysis of the site inventory in relation to the share DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
of the population that is comprised of non-White residents. This analysis excludes the Census Block Group where the North Bayshore Master Plan is located ( Census Tract 5046. 01, Block Group 1), which is analyzed separately below. This Block Group is unique from the remainder of the City in that the units in the site inventory that would be located in this Block Group would significantly outnumber the existing units in the Block Group. As a result, construction of the units in the site inventory could have a significant effect on the racial and ethnic mix in the Block Group as new households move into new units. This potential change could occur even with no change in the composition of the existing households in the Block Group, most or all of which live in a mobile home park and would be subject to various protections under the Mountain View Municipal Code. The existing mobile home park is anticipated to remain throughout the planning period.
Table 65 shows the existing distribution of housing units in Mountain View in relation to the nonWhite share of the population in each Block Group. As shown, almost half ( 48 percent) of all existing housing units in Mountain View are located in Census Block Groups in which non- White residents constitute 55 to 65 percent of the Block Group' s population. Among units in approved projects, pipeline projects, and available sites outside of the North Bayshore area, 74 percent of lower -income units are located in Census Block Groups where non-White residents constitute 55 to 65 percent of the Block Group' s population, meaning that approximately three quarters of all lower -income units in the site inventory outside of the North Bayshore area are located in areas with a racial and ethnic mix that is fairly typical for Mountain View.
As shown in Table 65, approximately 29 percent of existing housing units are located in Block Groups in which non- White residents constitute 65 percent of the population or more. Among lower - income units in the site inventory outside of the North Bayshore area, 21 percent would be located in these Block Groups, meaning that the site inventory does not overly concentrate affordable units in Block Groups with existing concentrations of non- White households.
Table 65 also demonstrates that the units in the site inventory are disproportionately located outside of areas with particularly small non- White populations. As shown, 23 percent of existing housing units in Mountain View are located in Block Groups in which non- White residents comprise less than 55 percent of the population. Among units in the site inventory, five percent of lower -income units excluding those in the North Bayshore area) would be located in Block Groups in which non- White residents comprise less than 55 percent of the population. This is due largely to the challenges associated with identifying viable housing opportunity sites in areas south of El Camino Real, which is where most of the City' s majority -White Block Groups are located. This Housing Element Update includes programs that will help to facilitate affordable housing production South of El Camino Real by allowing affordable multifamily housing in the R1 district when constructed in conjunction with non- profit religious and community assembly uses on large sites ( Program 1. 4) and facilitating ADU production and SB9 projects ( Programs 1.6, 1. 7, and 2. 2). Units that would be facilitated through these programs are not captured in the site inventory.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Table 65: Distribution of the Sites Inventory by Block Group Racial and Ethnic Composition, Excluding the North Bayshore Area
Block Group Racial and Ethnic
Composition Existing Housing Units ( a)
Lower - Income Units in
Site Inventory ( b)
Less than 55% Non -White
55%- 65% Non -White
65% or more Non - White
Notes:
23% 5%
48%
29%
74%
21%
a) Excludes existing households in the Census Block Group that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan. This Block Group is analyzed separately.
b) Includes units in approved projects, pending projects, and available sites. Excludes units in the Census Tract that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan. This Census Tract is analyzed separately.
Sources: US Census, 2020; BAE 2022.
In addition to the units evaluated in Table 65, the site inventory also includes 5,042 units in the Census Block Group that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan. Within this Block Group, non- White residents comprise an estimated 69 percent of the population, higher than is typical within Mountain View. It should be noted that most if not all of the existing housing units in this Census Tract are in a mobile home park, which likely provides a comparatively affordable housing option. The 5, 042 units in the site inventory are equal to approximately 14 times the number of existing units in this Census Tract. Of these units in the site inventory in this Census Tract, most 3, 691 units) are anticipated to be affordable to above moderate - income households, with the remainder affordable to low- income or moderate - income households. The inclusion of a significant number of above moderate - income units in this area along with the smaller share of low- and moderate -income units will prevent a concentration of lower -income units in this Census Tract.
Figure 98 further demonstrates the findings described above. The figure shows the sites in the site inventory, including approved projects, pending projects, and opportunity sites, as well as the nonWhite share of the population in each Census Tract. In addition, the map also shows religious sites, on which the development of affordable housing will be facilitated by Program 1. 4, and areas zoned for single-family use, which are potential sites for ADUs and SB9 projects that will be facilitated by Programs 1. 6, 1. 7, and 2. 2. As shown, the sites are not concentrated in any one area of the City, nor are sites concentrated in areas with particularly high concentrations of non- White residents. The figure demonstrates that there is a shortage of sites in the Census Tracts with particularly low concentrations of non- White residents. However, the map also demonstrates that much of these Census Tract are zoned for single- family use, enabling the creation of affordable units through ADUs or SB9 projects in these areas. These Census Tracts also include religious sites that could be potential future sites for affordable housing. The site inventory does not include ADUs, SB9 projects, or housing that could be built on religious sites, and therefore these units would be additive to units built on sites in the inventory.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Figure 98: Housing Sites by Share of Non -White Population Los. AIt, x
Sources: Esri, HERE, County of Sanara, Bureau of Land Management, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., USGS, EPA; Ci of Mountain View; BAE, 2023. Opportunity Sites Pipeline
Sites Religious
Sites R1
Zoning 0/
0 of Non - White Population by Block Group 39% -
49% 50% -
59% 60% -
69% 70% -
77% I
I 0
0. 5 1 2 Miles
DRAFT
Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Concentrations of Poverty Level and Low and Moderate -Income Neighborhoods Overall, Mountain View has very low levels of poverty, and its areas of highest concentration of households with income below poverty level only reach a maximum of 16. 4 percent. There is a grouping of lower -income RHNA sites in one of two Census Tracts with between 10. 0 and 16. 4 percent poverty; however, sites are predominantly located in areas with poverty below 10 percent.
Table 66 demonstrates that the units in the site inventory - including all approved projects, pending projects, and units on available sites - would help to affirmatively further fair housing by expanding low- income housing opportunities in areas with comparatively low proportions of low- and moderate - income households. The table shows that approximately half (49 percent) of households in Mountain View live in Census Tracts where less than 35 percent of households have low or moderate incomes.
Excluding units in the North Bayshore area, approved projects, pending projects, and available sites in the site inventory, 54 percent of lower -income units are in Census Tracts in which less than 35 percent of households have low or moderate incomes. This means that the lower -income units in the site inventory are disproportionately located in Census Tracts with relatively low existing concentrations of low- and moderate - income households.
Table 66: Distribution of the Sites Inventory by Census Tract Low- and Moderate - Income Composition, Excluding the North Bayshore Area
Census Tract Income Composition
Less than 35% Low/ Moderate Income
35% or higher Low/ Moderate Income
Notes:
Existing Housing Units ( a)
49%
Lower - Income Units in
Site Inventory ( b)
54%
51% 46%
a) Excludes existing households in the Census Tract that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan. This Census Tract is analyzed separately.
b) Includes units in approved projects, pending projects, and available sites. Excludes units in the Census Tract that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan. This Census Tract is analyzed separately.
Sources: US Census ACS, 2015- 2019; BAE 2022.
The analysis shown in Table 66 excludes the Census Tract that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan area ( Census Tract 5046. 01). As noted above, this Census Tract is unique from the remainder of the City in that the units in the site inventory that would be located in this Census Tract would significantly outnumber the existing units in the Tract. As a result, construction of the units in the site inventory would likely have a significant effect on the income distribution in the Census Tract as new households move into new units that target households at a range of income levels.
As shown in Table 67, an estimated 53 percent of households in Census Tract 5046.01 are low or moderate - income households, making this one of the Census Tracts with the largest concentrations of low- and moderate -income households in Mountain View. This is likely because the most if not all of the existing housing units in this Census Tract are in a mobile home park, which tend to provide a DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
comparatively affordable housing option. In total, there are an estimated 370 existing households in this Census Tract.
Among approved projects, pipeline projects, and units on available sites, 27 percent of the units in this Census Tract would consist of low- or moderate -income units, a significantly lower proportion than among existing households in this Census Tract. Assuming no change in the household income distribution among existing units in the Census Tract, the addition of these units would result in an estimated 29 percent of households in the Census Tract having low or moderate incomes. As shown in Table 66 above, approximately half of all households in Mountain View live in Census Tracts in which 35 percent of households have low or moderate incomes, meaning that the construction of the units in the site inventory would make the concentration of low- and moderate -income households in the North Bayshore area lower than the existing concentration in most areas of the City.
Table 67: Site Inventory Distribution of Low- and Moderate -Income Units, North Bayshore Area
All Units
Low - Income & Moderate -
Income Households/ Units ( a)
Low/ Moderate Income
Note:
Existing Housing Units
370
196
53%
Units in Site Inventory
5, 042
1, 351
27%
Total
5, 412
1, 547
29%
a) The number of low/ moderate- income units among existing units is estimated based on the share of existing households in the Census Tract with low or moderate incomes.
Sources: US Census ACS, 2015- 2019; BAE 2022.
Figure 99 further demonstrates the findings described above. The figure shows the sites in the site inventory, including approved projects, pending projects, and opportunity sites, as well as the share of low- and moderate -income households in each Census Tract. The map also shows religious sites, where the development of affordable housing will be facilitated by Program 1. 4, and areas zoned for single- family use, which are potential sites for ADUs and SB9 projects that will be facilitated by Programs 1.6, 1. 7, and 2.2. Apart from the North Bayshore area, the map does not show any significant concentrations of units in areas with large existing concentrations of low- and moderate - income households. Within the North Bayshore areas, most new units are anticipated to be affordable to above moderate -income households, as discussed above, and therefore the addition of units in that portion of the City would not increase the existing concentration of low- and moderate - income households in this area. The map also demonstrates that many of the Census Tracts with low proportions of low- and moderate -income households are zoned for single-family use and include religious sites, and therefore could be potential locations for the construction of affordable units through ADUs, SB9 projects, or development of affordable housing on religious sites.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Figure 99: Housing Sites by Share of Low- and Moderate -Income Households Lfl
0 Sources: Esri, HERE, County of San lara, Bureau of Land Management, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., USGS, EPA; y of Mountain View; BAE, 2023.
Opportunity Sites
Pipeline Sites
Religious Sites
R1 Zoning
of Low -to -Moderate Income Population by Tract
1 6. 5% - 29. 9%
l— I 30. 0% - 39. 9%
40. 0% - 49. 9%
MI 50. 0% - 59. 9%
0 0. 5 1 2
Miles
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Environmental Conditions ( CalEnviroscreen)
Sites are well distributed, with significant concentrations of RHNA sites in areas with the lowest percentile ( best) scores. There are also concentrations of sites in the City' s areas that have higher percentile scores; however, the City' s percentile scores rise only to 50. 5 percent at their highest, meaning that these sites are in areas that still rank well on a statewide basis. Some areas with high CalEnviroScreen scores, most notably the North Bayshore area, are anticipated to accommodate a portion of the City' s RHNA. These areas have high CalEnviroScreen scores largely due to the proximity to Highway 101. While the site inventory does include affordable units in these areas, most of these units are anticipated to be affordable to above moderate -income households. Therefore, the site inventory does not concentrate affordable units in areas with high CalEnviroScreen scores.
Access to Opportunity ( TCAC/ HCD Opportunity Areas)
The TCAC/ HUD Opportunity Index designates most of Mountain View as either a " highest resource," high resource," or " moderate resource ( rapidly changing)." The exception is the Census Tract that is located north of Highway 101, which encapsulates the North Bayshore Master Plan Area. The North Bayshore area currently has access to a significant number of jobs and is the subject of a major precise plan that will bring new development and services to the area, helping to improve access to opportunity. The City prepared and adopted the North Bayshore Precise Plan to create a complete community north of Highway 101, including new neighborhood - serving retail and services, new open spaces, land for a new school, and transit improvements along North Shoreline Boulevard to connect the area to the Downtown Transit Center and the rest of the City. The North Bayshore Master Plan, a development framework to implement the vision of the Precise Plan, is already under review, with approval expected in 2023. This Master Plan includes up to 7, 000 dwelling units as well as services, open spaces, a school and mobility improvements to vastly improve the quality of life for existing residents north of Highway 101.
Construction of the units in the site inventory will help to improve access to opportunity and affirmatively further fair housing in Mountain View. With the exception of units in the North Bayshore Master Plan area, more than half (52 percent) of all lower -income units in the site inventory are located in " highest resource" areas and 43 percent are located in " high resource" areas, while five percent are located in " moderate resource ( rapidly changing)" areas, as shown in Table 68.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Table 68: Site Inventory Distribution by TCAC/ HUD Opportunity Area, Excluding the North Bayshore Area
Opportunity Index Designation Existing Housing Units ( a) Lower - Income Units in
Site Inventory ( b)
Highest Resource
High Resource
Moderate Resource ( rapidly changing)
Low Resource
Notes:
41%
45%
14%
0%
52%
43%
5%
0%
a) Excludes existing households in the Census Block Group that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan. This Block Group is analyzed separately.
b) Includes units in approved projects, pending projects, and available sites. Excludes units in the Census Tract that encompasses the North Bayshore Master Plan. These Census Tracts are analyzed separately.
Sources: California Tax Credit Allocation Committee; HCD; BAE, 2022.
Figure 100 further demonstrates the findings described above. The figure shows the sites in the site inventory, including approved projects, pending projects, and opportunity sites, as well as the TCAC Opportunity Index score in each Census Tract. The map also shows religious sites, where the development of affordable housing will be facilitated by Program 1. 4, and areas zoned for singlefamily use, which are potential sites for ADUs and SB9 projects that will be facilitated by Programs
1.6, 1. 7, and 2. 2. Apart from the North Bayshore area, the vast majority of sites are located in High Resource and Highest Resource areas, with the remainder located in Moderate Resource Areas.
While there are a significant number of sites in the North Bayshore area, which is designated as a Low Resource area, implementation of the North Bayshore Master Plan is anticipated to improve access to opportunity in this area, as discussed above. The map also shows that there is significant potential for development of affordable housing on religious sites in High Resource and Highest Resources areas. In addition, there is potential for development of ADUs and SB9 projects in High and Highest Resource areas that are zoned for single- family use.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Figure 100: Housing Sites by TCAC Opportunity Score
Moun rain
View
Lcs Alto
Sources: Esri, HERE, County of SanMara, Bureau of Land Management, Garmin, GeoTechnologies, Inc., USGS, EPA; ' of Mountain View; BAE, 2023.
Opportunity Sites
i— I Pipeline Sites
Q Religious Sites
r77 R1 Zoning
2021 TCAC/ HCD Opportunity Map
Highest Resource
High Resource
i Moderate Resource
Low Resource
0 0. 5 1 2
Miles
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis 338 Resolution No. 18781
Education Domain Scores
The geographic distribution of units in the site inventory will help to improve access to opportunity and affirmatively further fair housing in Mountain View. As shown in Table 69, approximately half ( 50 percent) of all existing housing units in Mountain View are located in Census Tracts with an Educational Domain score under 80 percent, with the remainder (50 percent) in Census Tracts with an Education Domain score of 80 percent or higher. Among lower -income units in the site inventory, 65 percent are located in Census Tracts with an education domain score of 80 percent or higher.
This means that lower -income sites are disproportionately located in areas with high education domain scores. Many Census Tracts with Education Domain scores under 80 percent also have significantly higher scores than the regional ( San Mateo and Santa Clara County) median of 60 percent.
Table 69: Site Inventory Distribution by Education Domain Score Census Tract Education Domain Score
Less than 80%
80% or higher
Existing Housing Units
50%
50%
Note:
a) Includes units in approved projects, pending projects, and available sites.
Sources: California Tax Credit Allocation Committee; HCD; 2022.
Lower - Income Units in Site
Inventory ( a)
35%
65%
Transportation Access ( Housing + Transportation Cost as percent of Income) Most of the housing Opportunity Sites are located in areas with lower ( best) to moderate H+ T cost as a percentage of income for a moderate - income household. Many of the housing sites are spread along El Camino Real with significant transit options.
Access to Jobs ( Jobs Proximity Index)
All of Mountain View has either a jobs proximity index value of 51 to 74 or 75 to 99 (with 100 being the best); thus, all of the lower -income RHNA sites are in locations with good access to jobs. Many of the sites that are in the areas with values in the 51 to 74 range are directly across El Camino Real from areas ranked 75 to 99.
Housing Element Actions to Address AFFH Implications of the Site Inventory. This analysis demonstrates that the site inventory supports the City' s efforts to affirmatively further fair housing by identifying sites for a significant number of affordable units in high -resource areas with access to opportunity and areas with relatively low proportions of low- and moderate -income households.
While the site inventory does not concentrate sites for affordable units in areas with existing concentrations of non- White households, it also does not include a significant number of sites in predominantly White areas. This is due primarily to the challenges associated with identifying housing opportunity sites in areas south of El Camino Real, an area that is characterized by high - DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
value single-family homes, where most of the predominantly White Census Block Groups in Mountain View are located. While the site inventory does identify some sites within this area, due to the high value of the existing homes and challenges with site assembly, much of this area would be unlikely to meet HCD' s criteria for lower -income housing opportunity sites even if rezoned at to allow for higher densities. This Housing Element Update includes programs that will help to facilitate affordable housing production South of El Camino Real by allowing affordable multifamily housing in the R1 district when constructed in conjunction with non- profit religious and community assembly uses on large sites ( Program 1. 4) and facilitatingADU production and SB9 projects ( Programs 1. 6,
1. 7 and 2. 2). Units that would be facilitated through these programs are not captured in the site inventory.
Local Data and Knowledge
The sites inventory includes a number of parcels in the part of Mountain View located north of Highway 101, which is currently classified by the HCD/ TCAC Opportunity Areas map as a Low Resource area. The Low Resource classification is likely due to fact that the area has historically been a non- residential area with limited amenities for residents; however, this area is planned for substantial housing development in the 2023 to 2031 Housing Element planning period and beyond via the North Bayshore Precise Plan. The implementation of the precise plan can be considered a place -based strategy that will help to transform the area into a vibrant, mixed -use neighborhood that is well connected to the rest of the City of Mountain View and has access to the largest concentration of jobs in the City. The first guiding principle of the precise plan is to create complete neighborhoods, calling for the blending of residential, commercial, and office uses with services, open space, and transportation options for residents and area employees. While the precise plan includes a number of sites identified to accommodate a portion of the City' s lower -income RHNA, the precise plan calls for new residential development to be mixed -income, 20 percent affordable units and the balance market rate units.
During the public review process for the Housing Element Update, some stakeholders commented that they wished to see more housing Opportunity Sites identified in the more affluent neighborhoods south of El Camino Real and around Downtown. In response to those comments, the Housing Sites inventory process included an evaluation of additional sites south of El Camino Real, including religious sites and shopping centers, and Downtown, including additional City- and government - owned sites. In addition, many programs have special focus on these areas to increase affordable housing.
While religious sites did not meet the Opportunity Sites criteria, primarily because there are few precedents involving church sites and multi -family development, the Housing Element includes a program ( 1. 4) to allow religious sites additional density when constructing affordable housing developments on their land.
Several shopping centers south of El Camino Real were identified as " Village Centers" in the 2030 General Plan, where new housing could be allowed in the context of redeveloped neighborhood shopping sites. Zoning amendments adopted with the Housing Element Update implemented this General Plan direction. These sites were included in the sites DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
inventory if they are consistent with the underutilized sites methodology ( see Rezoned Opportunity Sites section).
Program 1. 1 includes rezonings of several sites in high -opportunity areas, including the Downtown Transit Center, which may be an opportunity for a joint development with CalTrain, and other nonresidential sites south of El Camino Real, such as 1949 Grant Road and offices near Blossom Valley Shopping Center.
Program 1. 3 includes increases to densities in R2 districts with a focus on areas with the best access to high opportunity areas.
Program 1. 11 will track and ensure no net loss of lower -income unit capacity in areas south of El Camino Real and around Downtown.
Though there is a lack of vacant/ underutilized land in the R1 district that meets the State' s criteria for housing sites ( e. g., larger than one- half acre, vacant, likely to redevelop in the 2023- 2031 time period), there are still opportunities for new housing for lower -income households in the form of potential Accessory Dwelling Units and Junior Accessory Dwelling Units that could be added to existing single- family lots, as well as the potential for some densification of the neighborhood through the provisions of SB9. Programs 1. 6, 1. 7, and 2. 2 incentivize these types of projects.
Program 4. 5 includes working towards at least 65 lower -income units in Downtown, which is among the highest -opportunity and lowest non -white population areas of the City. This may include use of City -owned sites.
Summary of Conclusions and Approach to Policies and Programs The sites inventory and the housing development opportunities that it provides will help to affirmatively further fair housing. Overall, the sites inventory does not exacerbate fair housing issues, such as contribute to R/ ECAPS, RCAAs, or racial or ethnic isolation or segregation; nor does it overly concentrate lower income housing Opportunity Sites in any single area of the City. It does not concentrate lower -income housing Opportunity Sites in areas that already have significant concentrations of poverty or areas of racial or ethnic isolation or segregation. In contrast, opportunities for housing development for lower -income households are identified in areas with high opportunity and good access to jobs, transportation, and a healthy environment.
The sites inventory, which fully accommodates the City' s share of the regional housing need for the 2023 to 2031 planning period, along with a substantial buffer, also helps to affirmatively further fair housing from a regional perspective by creating opportunities for housing development for households at all income levels in a location that has outstanding access to jobs, services, a healthy environment, and other amenities that support a high quality of life and positive life outcomes for residents.
A robust roster of local policies and programs will complement the sites inventory to help protect housing opportunities for existing lower -income households, households with special needs, and minorities, and work to ensure equitable access to housing within the community for all socioeconomic segments of the community as well as prospective residents.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
HCD Sites Inventory Spreadsheets
This space intentionally left blank
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis 342 HCD Sites Inventory Table A
Juristliction Name
MOUNTAIN VIEW
Atltlressllnter Site
section
100 ANTONIO SAN CL
5Digit ColeZIP
0- 1210
Assessor
Parcel Number
14817001
Consolidated Sites
Not Applicable
Gertaral Plan
Designal' wn
Current)
Mlxenuse em
Zoning
Designation Current)
P(
40)- Spare
plan
c.
Minimum
Density
Allowed
units/ acre)
0 MaxDensity
Allowed
units/ acre)
6389
Parcel
Size Acres(
0. Existing Use/ Vacancy
0350°Vear9lassreta11er2ernime- SU
It 1566 FAR
Infras4uclure
yescunem
PubliclyOwned
Owne0 aelysite Status
Available
Mengfietl in
Last/ Last Two
Planning
Cycle( s)
sed In PrlPr
Hwyng Element
Lower
Income
Capacity
0 Moderate
Income
Capacity
30 Above
Moderate Income
Capacity
0 Total
Capacity
3000000. 5,
Optional
Informafioni
Site
Optional Information 2
Maximum cemlry ut
by
FAR
185) Maximum dwell) g
un1
r
acre n,
p
on
the
range
Optional Information 3
MOUNTAIN VIEW 10CAMINO EEL REAL O462701 19142003 Not gppllcable EOM. agemdo enCn
R(
30)-
al Precise EI C4670 Plan
0 65- 111 058 ga 834365- FAR: 0063, Yar8um: 1967 Yes - current O0 5 atelY _ Avallade N° tu9E536ar HPuan
0 35 0 Opp° Mnluasp7Janary Sae31, 2023
23 Oenslry set
by
FAR
185). Maximum U4ellIng unrra^ pp104 acre
shown s based on the
Of
precedent proscts Rez°
ne0 b 23
FAR,
allowing nately
31111/ 46 meet
R HEA MOUNTAIN
VIEW 1oI0
94 EL MONTE AV 04a2321 1700] 06] Not gppllcable Mlxenuse en P( 3B) El Camlne RI,,,
Plan 0
4150 0 3l
gasstmlonFAR O0] 4, Year 1. 11955 Yes - current N°- PMalely- AvabadeOwmeO Not used In Prbr HPuang Element
g1g
0 1 o0000000, 0 SIC Masmum Dens.
set by FAR
135) xlmum
dwell) units per acre shown
s based the range ofpreced precedent
protects
MOUNTAIN
VIEW
HVENIM 04314. 11614107 Not App... ppllcable tse0use ore NPdhIx use PYSMre 39)- Pretlse an
0124 1
FgRaa I
lterduanaucpnnaamabceYa- nnem Year 0 -' SUllt el' wn 190o Arra".
Holused
In
Prar Pstng 00Element 61 6 Opportunlry si to Masmum Bens. set
by FAR 1-
85)
xlmum
dwell.
units
per acres ors based
en appprtonal Increase or
decreaseMOUNTAIN rmanasVI Precedent Prolects
AVENIM
940431422 11614100 Not Applicable rth ' Vs"' Mixed -
use 39)
North YsnorePrecise Plan awry0LISPS
CarrrergnnaFAR: 03. Year Sulu 1900
yes cunem NP- PmalelyOwnba Avallade Used PnorIn H
slog Element 53
0 0 s3
OppnunTy site Masmum censlry set by
FAR Maxrmurn xre5snvwnls
basedU Dist
units
per aPpodsmallnerease or decrease Mr. AVENIDAg precedent 940431422 MOUNTAIN VIEW 11614109 Not gppllcable Net" Saysnore Mlxba- 6a(
a) North
PysnorePretlse
Plan
0 g -
1 story onelndustnal/ medkal clldc- FAR. 0. 3,Year BEd.
1.0 yes current No -Pnvalely- Owned
gvallable Na Usedln HnangPrior Element
0 45 0
45 Oppprtuniry
Ste Matcrnum Bens. set by FAR
acre shownlls basemurn
d
ol^
rgunitsper pmrpppolnallnereasePrdecrease Iris de
precent emllbar0
MOUNTAIN
VIEW a10.
VENIM
94043-1422
11614110 Not ApplicableSUaynesnore Mmrtbah Pce( 39) - North ys6° re Precse Plan 0 71story gagone- 31,Yar
Sullt1980Indust.
s{ ace - FARcunem Yes- 0 alelY- gvanade Ho used In Poor slog Element 0 47 S. 0Maxnum 4] Oppottumry Dens. set by FAR 185). Maxmum dwelling units per
acre shown
sbased pia aPpodsnal Increase or
decrease rd n is
precedent STORFF Prolle AV
940434222
14736025 MOUNTAIN VI
No
PPIlcable to Megghborhoo0
a
use CN 0 0 33 gas station- FAR: O028, year Bud 1. 8Yes oNe wned PatelY- Available N
sed InPr"
o
uang Element 0 9 0
O¢
eddFebma February 2023
Rezoned to al. Rpprox malely Oplumntial
t
nlnHg not
necessary
toVIEWmeet R STORFF NAAV MOUNTAIN 04342. 147.
038 Not App... Megbahherhe
J
Ix - use CN 030 1aPry reaaurantanq n, vacant mness ten ear- FnR. a 268, year Suit 960 yes - current 0 - alelYwn Available H sed In Prar outing
Element
g
36 14, 02023 OPWrWmite- February stop ImaRezoned btely aDWantal meet t IngNAt necessary
to MOUNTAIN VIEW 28WEL CAMINO
REAL
0404518 15007025 0M
IxedLse emdpr P(
30)3E Real Precise Plan 065-111 0paP28vrgle medkal Pnice- tenant FAR. 0 5, ear SUllt 1945 yes nnem PnvalelY Owned Avallade Na used In Prior HPuang Element 021 0
2 1 Opportudry Sueacre
Bens. set
by FAR 185). Maximum
dwelllrg units per
shown s .
the range of precedent mlects. MOUNTAIN VI
34WEL CAMINO REAL 9f°
462518 1500] 026
p Mix
eduseemapr P( 30)- EI Cara" Real P
PI
a reclse an
0 65- 111
064Yes- vacant two- Pnlea- story FAR:
0154 current alely owner Avallade sed In Pnpr HP3z uang Element 0 0 00,Den.
0004 sae Masmum
set by
FAR 185). Maximum dwelllrg units
per on the
range of
precedent MOUNTAIN VIEW 12 EEL
CAMINO
REAL 040-
2701 197.
004 Not Applicable VIIlageorndor CECR Center) R(30) El Camino al Precise Plan 65111 0large mutt -
center vnthtenant shops. onestory bmg1
s (pharmacy and VanO6 otherrel. uses)-
FAR: 025]; Year tut 19., locatea
IncurrentOwned gNOal" Available opportunity NaareUsedYesInPrar Housing Element56 0
0 Opp.. Sue - Raone0 Pt
January 31,
2023 a Maxmum
cemiry set
by FAR 185). Maximum riven Ing
units per re
shownls based
on range M precedent Pmlects. n
020524 b23FAR, alloying a^ pprmmately.
111 pU/tic. n1nHg.
tnecessary to
innNA MOUNTAIN VIEW
1220
GRANT RH 9404a322] 19314011
Not gppllcable
Mlxenuse Con P^n)-cam- P, IK Prec7e Plan 072 O36
gasstmlon0. 131; year FAR:
Bud
1963 Yes- currentOwnled- Avauade No used H din Poor O° a°g Element 0 18 0 Opportus. sae- of
January 31, 2023
Ranedbanrnv ralaemial at aPW Imately-]
2 pWac.
mntnRHNA necessary
to MOUNTAIN VIEW
1. 0 PEAR AV
04314. 11614.8
H Mrth Saysnore
Ixed- Use 6a( ys) hore Precse Plan 01. 157 11
sngle
story Indus. use
bullring -
FAR: 347, Year
BEd
1977, paperryowner ted anon for developmient
agreement to denture this ate
to the Clry
for ainga Tart of Phase
1 ofanreuoye master plan YescurrentOwned Ne 'vat" Y wn gvallable Not used
In PrarHousing0 Element 110 0
18OppoMdty Sue- Nort M1
Sayshore Master
Plan Maxmum Oensiry set by FAR 35) Number mdxelling units used on Master
Plan
nbminal
as Of January 1,
2023 MOUNTAIN VIEW 1230 PEAR AV
940431441 11614095 H o00
Saystrore MIxeO se 5(39)- 5113 ysMre Precise Plan 0
157 1
0 angleIndustrial storyuse
bulwngFAR: hassubmmedueu 1.
6,
pppeM owner development agreement tP deacate
this 12220n to tiste to
the ehousing Gry asfor anordable ad of
Plisse
1 m a murtFyear odder P.
Yeses current elY_
Owned Available sed In
Pr"
Housng
Element 113 0
0 1,
3 OppPMdry
Site -
North Sayshore
Master Plan MaxnuM ce5M
set by FAR 335)
Number m dwelling
nus nMasterP suIna,
as
m
January 1, VIEW2023 an1250 MOUNTAIN cram Road.
040- 3227 1931. 12 Not
Appbcable Mlxedpse Corn P(27)- Gam- PYIIIS Precise Plan 0 72 5. story mu5itenantsupermarket re, rel. ( grocery
store) - FAR : 023,
Year .1Yes-current0 ePdnval"
gvallable Ho U`- edln Pnpr
gElement 150 61 0 2
E. Site- of January 202331, Rapnetlballrnv radenti t aRpepo imately-] 2 pWacamat
RHNAng tnecessary
to MOUNTAIN VIEW SO SPACE PHFK yg,
940431434 11614070 Horth
Sayshore Mixed se a)- North yshore Pretlne Plan 0
15] 0
2apdplc. la. esvnthpaceInqusblal
molt
actumg - FAR 0416, YarMaxmomSunim
1959; property owner bassubmined veto... to theagreement OWhousing toforlateaffordable
a
tntsate
Tad
ofPhase 2of
multi - year master yes -
current alelY- Owned gvanade sed
In Pnpr HP
tang
Element 3
0 g
gOpp...
sue - North Sayshore
Master Plan Bens.
set by FAR 335) Nmber welligunits
Lased on Master
Plan submltlal
as aJanary
1, VIEW 2023. 55 Par AveMOUNTAIN Affordable 222047bn)
g4g43 11614g94 N
tApplicable
h- Use re
Mixed -
use
39)- North Ysnore
Precse Plan
859(g 15] drcaled 1 toaffordableCluslrg (
cannot
brarrytntng used se) Yes cunem Yes -
OryAvailable ri. seP. Owned
m
nor Net Element Ho 112 0
ford. 0 hone- O alrg
deMax 1.. ceml dxef lny FARb35doncap gumts
based
on
capaclry
analysts pwlded dump enttlementof project
that
dedkaled
the property MOUNTAIN VI
rlagg SPACE PARK
WY 940431434 116140]1 Not
Applicable rth Saysnore M..
se 39)
North ysturePretlse Plan 0 15]
098 twostory light lrxluariausclenee FAR. mbry - O42,
Vear
9ul1t. 1959 laboratory es current NP- PnvalelyHoOwned gvallable Na Used In Priorstop Element 107 0010] OPpprtudry SlC censiry set
by FAR 35)
mMmmum dwelling ants per acre shownls
based on
Parppprtlnal Increase Prdecrease emllbar0 Iris precedent MOUNTAIN VIEW fAMINORFAL 0402402 15430044
Not APPicab. M8e0.
Use
em rrecune
an Real) 0E PI 0 65- 111 O96 gasstab0n- FAR 0059, 1972 Yes- var currentO Suitt le alelY_ wn Available H sedln Pnpr hang Element 048 0Sue 48 Opportudry MaxnuM miry FARset18e5) by MaMm neduel^ Ing up., the range m precedent Pmlects.
HCD Sites Inventory Table A
MOUNTAIN VI 1345 BIRD
WY
0411339 11611038 H Mxltendr snore 39)- ysrareNortnPrecise Plan
0 71 t6. Oaplcmlonbrdevelopmem
four separate once bulmlrgs ye.
trffiluffial uses, ureason spaces, devgated
S. nestl rg area, and assocoled
parks; FAR: 32 , 984,
soberly owner has abuttedu agreememto
develop
this vte with resldenbal and arange of other uses arm dedlcale ap.
Yesib
of
the
Prase
Clay
2 for
of
a
affordable muapyear houslrg
master
as
plan
mof
pad
of
cunem Ownec slay- Avanade No
used In Prlor H
ouvng Eternem 0
ze4 3 1
ppo Md Nsne- Nortn ysMre Master Plan Saxton
censlN set by
FAR
ffils
asa.
urmnaae vduellan i bmuinal as January
1, 2023. MOUNTAIN
VIEW 1350 PEAR AV 940431302 11614114 Not Applicable North „ shore lased -
se 39)
North PYSMrePrecise
Plan is] 0
0 - cooly atom, O332,... mule -tenant IId 1981, fight Indust..- FARes cunem No - alelY_ Owned Available
Not
Used
In Mrs Housng Element
92 0
0 92 Opponunlry Sae Dens. set
by FAR
35)
mMexlmum
dxelling ants per aopereeepl reeseordecrease
rds pecedent irkt' o ecb
MOUNTAIN VI
1375 SHOREBIRD WV 940431360
11611028
H odh „ she,
MIxe0- se
39) Nodh
15]
YSMre PlanPretlse 0 488 office ang
With Indusinal uses- FAR 903; property
owner has submltleduapplcabon fordevelopment agreement. developih2 vte xlb
revdentelarp dedkaleapomon he the
Clay for nous. as pan of
Phase 2 as r affordable Pan master yes -
tune
m No -Pnvaloly- Owned blqvalae UsedNot
In Prior ryp vng
Element 110 0
24] T Oppo1W1N Sne- North Baysh° re
Master Plan Matson Denslry
set by FAR
35). Number
ofdwel111925fs nMaster w coalPas of January 1,
2023lan MOUNTAIN VIEW 1383
SHOREBIRD WY RE043- 1339 116110. H thr3Ua45" re Ms. -
Use 39)-
Nodh ysMrePrease
office
Plansae 20201has ding With matsthal
uses- FAR aunt 1982, propeM owner
templed apgkmlon for development
agreement to develop
Ms resbentlal as part of
Phase 2oi yyear a m er
v plan escunem aelYOvmed
Avanade Used In
Prior
Hovng
Element 0 0
330 330O750012
site - North Bayshore Master Dens,. setPlan nyMax FAR 4 5) Number well, guilts Lased
on Master Plan
wbml8al as ofJanuary 1, 2023. MOUNTAIN
VIEW 1390 SHOREBIRD
WY0411338
North
11611025 H Bayshpre Mixed - Use
Nortn yshore
Prease PI Dan29s
80 office
bald. - FAR 0
282, Year Bunt: 9ez; property ownernaswbmmed appglcallonbrdealopmem agreement to vbp
ih¢ wmh res. Wal as pan of of anent -year master plan Yes- cunem No - a. 11y- Owned gyaeade Used
In
Pnor
Houvng
ESmem D o
34s 3s
Oppodunay sae - North Baysh° re Master Plan
cenelry set by FAR
445) Number
ofdweeing umth
n Master as ofPlan January 1, wbml8al 2(
123. MOUNTAIN VIEW
97 sn
BIRD WV 94W31339
11611021 H
North
Baysh° re Ms. -
se 39) Noah
Mre Pretlse Plana 0
202
offse
1has long With982; 0nal
uses - FAR 982; mea propeM epplpatonownerf« o
alopmemagreementodevelop
ihls Mk revdenilal as pad
of Phase lof a multi -year
master
plan Y ea-caem PnyatavOwned
Ayallame Na mused Mar
Houvng Element 0 0
270 zOOppo.
nay sue - Nodh Baysh° re Master Plan
Masson Denslry set by
FAR s). Number
a
dxeemgbumis
wml8al as of January 12023
n MOUNTAIN VI CAMINOREt„ 0412404
15430015 Not Applicable MlxetUse Coco rP( 30)_E recess
an R IPPI
4150 0 - estOry 0
cox - unit commeraal( FAR: d=auN, 02 computer see', Vear Bula:vapng, Sinew) - 1915 Yes- es current O°-
P
alely_ Avanade sedln Pr" N54 Use Element 0
16 0 1
60ppoaunTy site Saxton setby FAR
135) Maxsomrydwelll
dwell.
sper
Is rangeacre Shown
prxMent prom.. based° n of
MOUNTAIN VIEW SPlymomh 51
9404312Z] 116101M North H BaysMre Ms. - Use
39) - North
1 Pretlse
PI 0
nt 312 O99 retell space with
eve spaces Intl t95hgareslauranls and spaces with property owner has suborned delicate
appllcatlaonY tmsvtetofor development
the
agreement
Clay
to
or
uslrg project as pad of Phase o of multl- year master
pen
es -curse m No -
alely Om. gvallable Not Used
In
Mar
Hovng Element 83 0
03OppoMnlN
Ste - North Bayshore Master Plan DenslN set by FAR
445) Number
Of
dvellingunns
nMaster Pof Januarys, w 18a1w 20231an MOUNTAIN VIE
1500 uttuu„NE
at 0431314 11613030
Not
Apt...
North Bayarare Mixed use 39) -
North Yshore
Precse Pen 91s - 1sTestory
sn
le tenant cinema, owner FARhas10;expressed , var con: merest 1986; In property Wk... d velopmem ves caem rvoPnyatav- owned
Ayauade unease Pro vngHo Element
100 100
0 1st OO
Oppoaunlry sae Dens. set
by FAR 4 (
5) mMae
Ill. un.
per
n s bases proportlonallInecre oraecrease
vmlla
dstr st'
sprgecis. Due b
large
vze, precedent
potential denvty reduced by approximately
half. MOUNTAIN VIEW 1504
GRANT RD
9404O3214 19312001 Not Applicable MlxedUse Com Phut) Gmm _ Ph.. Plan 0 72 5 89 large mulfl- tenam shopplrg
center
viN one story bulmings (grocery and
various other refill uses)- FAR: O242,
Year Bunt 1973, located In high opporlunity
area yes current yeNo- melyecqallade Own sedln Element Pear Hauvng 51 0 0
Oppor D020l
Nsltea StJ 312( 123
nary
Rezoned
b
allow resldental
at
apprarlmately-] 2 ['Mac oningnet necessary
to meet RHNA.
MOUNTAIN VIEW SHORELINE
BL 0431315
11614050 H odh-U42 Ixed- se a)- Nodh YSMre PIPrecse
0 202
1 - Wo dblrgswml1272;
Dal lses - FAR
b 962, property owner has
submmeduappllcal1n
for development agreement
e
to dealop inns
v. rev... as pad
of Phase 1 of meal -year master pen
Y
es- cunem No - PnvalelyOwned
gyallade Hot used MOIn ovng Element 310OppoMd5 0 321 Sae - North Bayshore Master Plan cent. set 49) byN7 FAR 45). Number of dwellingantis Master Plan January 1, wbmltlal as2023. MOUNTAIN nof VIEW 164 EM SHORNE BL
0431316 11610085 HBaysh° North re Ixed- use P(
39) N«th
BanMPretlse Plaresffintal
0 202 0 08
vrgle
o8ke
story bu4Wing- FAR: 0
339,
wYear Bunt 1983, property owner has bml8ed
appncatlon
for
viedevelopment wnh la agreement as part develop bk
Phase o 1of a multimasterYear yes - current No OInevatelyNot Owned gvallable
used In Prlor
Houvng 0Etemem 0
112 12 Opportunay Slte -
Nodh Bayshore
Master Plan Maxlmumces. set by FAR 45).
Number xelllng units
rased on
Master
Plan
sub... of January 1,
2023. MOUNTAIN VIEW SHOREMNE BL
04313% 116140E6 H North
BaysMre MIxe0 se 39) - No. yshore Precise Plan 0
202 1 4officetwospaces
with
olustnal lung usesFAR:
0293; wedm Bulno958, propeM owner
has bmalet appwtsn for
development vieagreement wihbcents, asdevelop this
pad of Phase 1of munl
year master plan Yes current No -
stely- OwneO
Available Not Used
In Prlor Houvng Element
0 0 2]
3 273 OppoMmN site -
No. BaysMre
Master Plan cenelry
set by FAR 45) Nu
wellingunits nuary 1,
z023lan w
IBalw of
Ja nMasterP MOUNTAIN
18906017VI Ave Iramont 040- 3701 Not Appncable
Office CO 0 33 74 Bury onsst195ory ce. 1o8ke- FAR O335; Year 5 Yes - No current UsedOo- ec ately- Avanade Ho In Pearuvng Element 0 15 0 OppaMmN r¢°° site -lag °° future ex°°( t m a NA shortfall) MOUNTAIN
VIEW 08 01037.
1..RAMONTE 096AV
Not
App... megecdbu a] CN 0 30 O32 gasstabon- FAR 008, Year Bullt1955 Yes- currentNo Offer. vately- wn Available H sedln Pro ouvn9 Element 0 6 0 oppo. n 31, Rezoneed. 2023ooiJa nary Rezoned ap
arlrrabtely aDlWamlal
t meet
RHNAt necessary
to
MOUNTAIN aVIEW SHOREMNE BL
043131a 11610aeo n North
r3uayamre
Mixed -se 397 - North I
nMre Pretlse- Plan 0
z9z 1
86 story
O389, office buting- FAR:
meal Buuu: a
996,
propeM owner has wednm pplatlon
r«cealoprrem agreement
to
with wdevelop pad of ths vte
Phase 1 of multi- year master
plan yes cunem mely- Owned
Avanade nedIn
Prar Houvng Element
0 0
297
2 opportumry
sae - Noah
Bayshore Master
Plan cent. set by FAR 4s) rvmber
adwelnnoumts nMaster P
wmmalw of
January 1,
2023 nVIEW SHOREMNEMOUNTAIN BL 0431318
11610019 H teeth BaysMre Ix -
seNodh yshore Breese Plan 0 202
0 4
dig- FAR: Year022]; Bunt:
Mee
PuolceM awnerhwsubmltled appp...
ter
dealopmem agreement to slop Os vte with reseenllal
as
pad of Phase 1
of mull -year master plan Yes -current ONo -
In alelywn gyallade H Used In
Pear eeg Element OppoMmN 0 0site - Nodh Dena,. BaysMreset Master Plan by FAR 445) Nu wet
lingunits ofJanuaryMast2ear Plan
18a w
HCD Sites Inventory Table A
MOUNTAIN VI sHORELINE BL 0431318 11610018 HMixed orth Baystrore use 39) VstareNorthPrecise Plan
0 202 0
bike
path
tm4
usaapart space; properly owner Pprlc. ion
for
velppment agreementbdevebp Nis
a vnN revdentoll as partot Phase 1
of
a mug -year masterplanMaximum
V
es current
No - . ely_
Owned
Avallawe
Not Used In Prior
Housng Element
0 0 2OppoM. ry sue - North
Baydlore Master Plan
Mascots Density set
by FAR
4s) Number sumltlal 05 dwel logum. asnMaderP of
nary t, 20231an MOUNTAIN
VI CAMINO REAL Od62216 t] OO6W5 Not Applkable edLse
Curndor SCR
VillageP(nter)
38)-
El Camin Real
Precise Plan 0
65111 0 d° 0
vrgle
11 eartenantBuiltrental t9se carlocatbn Y FAR current elk- estune 0wned
vala
bl a sail q
In Pnpr Ho
uvng Element 0
16 0 Opp...
ate
anuary nail 31 .
23 FAR
18s). Max mumtyMrellset birun6per
re shown
based on precede. range Is d
Projects. allowing Rezoned
mately 65- meet 111 Mac approxiy tnecessa
RH9N4
Ntp MOUNTAIN
VIEW
S7 "' HAM 9d046210] 15436007 Not Apple.. pplrcable Mlxedusef, 1201 R(a)_E eat Plan 0precise 65- 111 0 eu anb ta71020200. 064r Bwltm. 1961 ) Yescurrent Pnv. ely- Owned Avallawe
Used
In
Prior sing Element
0 37
0 3, 0 ppprtuntry
site Maximum Denlrysetby FAQ ow dwelling
based ur o therange ran precedent shownsinjects.
do.. Deslry MOUNTAIN VI
10WEL cnMINO REAL
9dOd62002151%018 Not Applicable CECRbVlllage nrdo 772V
eW p(38) El
Camin Real Precise
Plan 0 65111
2 dory six -
unit retail (fumaure, FAR. O318,
Ye Butt1tenant vacarcy-Ves-cunem ely _ Owned
Available
wain
Pnor
Hnvng Element
030
0 OppoMnity see - ot3a 31,
2023
nary set
by
FAR
t85) xlmum
dwelllrg units perappmelmately dpr! ManxT
mrecis. nb iMrange ent Rezoned
23 FAR,
alloys. 6S' Iht
W/ ac_ meet
agnot
inecessary
tp NA MOUNTAIN
VI
21WEL CAMINO REAL
04622161] 006oTA F Mlxed- Use
Corr.` SCR Village
Center) 38)-P(
El
Gm. Real Precise
Plan 0 65111
1 - onersk. mullytenant
retail ( pet stare, pool sap22r
auto park, shipping - 9,
1921 average a. 1935orW El1. Mgsee
wen
owners,. consoldwin pofe
altp 424967asane project, located In
non ...nay area Yes- e
s
ant No - PrMely- Owned avala Not A UseM Ibl
Prim rypuvng Element
16 0
0 OpppMniry sue- tJ 31
2023 °
anuaryacre Density
set
by FAR
185). Maximum dwell,. antis per shown rs
don the range d precedent
Protects. Rezoned b
23 FAR,
allows. ornately 65-
111 Mac. oning not
necessary to meet RH.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
WEL AMINOREAL
046221617006062 F
Mixed - use
fu EDCenter) en
P( 30)- El
Camin
Plan 0Real Precise 65-
111 1b6 nos.. maul -
tenant retail (pet stare, FHRol s02]
blrt19pd91921 aed. 193Wem Camin Peal;
Year Built 198d; partpta soud. ed
stew. in common wmershlp bpe..
to develop as one project located In
h. opportun.
area Yes- currentPnv. ely- Owned Avallawe
Nd
uses
In Pnpr Housing Element
20 0
0 p312029 R¢ Ponednlazot29 nary Marmon Beniry
set by FAR
18s).
Maximum
dwell) uwis perarvpprmrimatery re stewnls
based on range d precedent
projects n Rezoned . 23
FAR, albwng 65- 111
BI1/ x. meet
RHgN4tneeessary
to MOUNTAINVIEW 42w
EL CAMINO REAL 041.16 170.. 8F Cm Vlll enn.
n
Center) R(
30)-
El
Camlm eat Precise Planonsoild. edvte 065-
111 0_ ono.. multi -
tenant retail (pet stare, pool store,
auto parb, snipping) - aremge FAR 0
22 1
9,
1921
and
1935 W El anti.
Pea
Vear BM 1984; Tad° ta with common°
wnerdlip vng potential
toMydevelop areaas oneYes-project: currentOwed located nhgn... elY- Available Ho sail In Prl°r
dig
0 4Element 0 Opp° rkm. stle- otJanuary 312023 Maornurn
Density
set by FAR
d."The
t res aNn Per 185) "'ain' nls
based on range d precedent
protects. Rezoned b
23 FAR,
Max.
apprpxlmatey 65e"
Wear_ meet RespnmgnM. essaryb
rec MOUNTAIN VIEW
CAMINO REAL Od62002 1543601d Not Applicable Center) lagenm Center) 3BEl P( Camin Rea,'pre, ise Plan 0 65111 t - onedo5 M nppry site- dare; PropertyFAR: efirg Oddd; ine Year MO 1959 Yes- s
current
PMalelY _ Owned NdAvailable Usedln
PMr Hpuvng Element
61 0
0 O Murry osia- a31
2029 "
nry Maornurs
Dens.
udell, FARbased.. usts
range acre
nls
based d precedent on range acres shown
projects. owng R¢°
nedb23FAR, aIIU. to RezonirHg
toRec.., Rezonrapprom. meetR ntrecessary ely
MOUNTAIN
VIEW
NOR CAMINO Od62262 REAL1] OOs016 Not Appilcable Mlxeduse Dorn. R( lPrecse Plan 65111 ea 00 Year Borytsi9] etenant Gee den - cunent FAR 0084, uI0Ovmed ately- Available Ho sedln Pn° 0r23vng Elementacre 0 23 ocum., sue Maximum Density set by FAR
18s). Maximum
dwelling units per shown s
based on the range
d
Precedent
Projects. MOUNTAIN VIE
CAMINO REAL 0462' 102 15436012 Not AMMOMlxedUse Cam rReal Real Precse Plan 0 65111 0 0123Vryar Bletenant restaurant - t.FAR 1911 a uI yen cunentOwned . ely_ Available HO sedln Prar 0uvng40Elementacre 0 400, 00rtunlry site Maxnurn Density set by FAR
185).
Maximum
dweihng antis per shown s
based on the range
of
precede.
mbcts. MOUNTAIN VIEW
20oW EL CgMINO REAL 0462606 15005112 Not Appilcable MlxMuse Coro rP(30)- El Camin Real Precse Plan 0 41
s0 0 -
edov vale eartenant fast food - FAR 0.131, ullt. 1. 9 yes cunent No - .ely Owned Available
Not
used
In Prior Hnvng Element
0 1d
0 1 dOpportuwry siteacreDensity set
by FAR
1.35)
Maximum
dwelling
units per Shown s
based the range precedent mbcis.
nd aec MouNTAw VIEW
020WEL cAMINo REAL
040-21. 15437016Not APPucame M Ixeduae fumaprP(38)-El
Camin Real Precise
Plan 0 65111
0 one- story recall (
cunem
redaurant (sYes- Ipr., store)- Year 1951sing Pnv. dvawned Available Usedln
PMr
Hp Element
0 32
0 3z opPpnpmry sae Density set
by FAR
185). Maximum dwelilrg units per on the range
d
Precedent
Prdl ds. MOUNTAIN VI
21126WEL 2. 2.
rw
REAL 0462104 15437018 Not Applicable MlxedUse Coro rP( 30)- El Camin Real Precise
Plan 0 65111
0 - 2 cant
onestory restaurant - FAR: 0172; Maximum Year
MO
9ce; the build 52, see
Is surround. bya building has
not been halo ink
ntsee ( up ; sgnsptgrmlalyboarded v..sell ma
n
YescurrentOwned No - .eiy- Avallawe Not used In Prior H° uvng Element 0 26
0 260pportumty site Density set
by FAR
18s). Maximum
dwell,. antis per re shown
s based on the range
precedent
Projects.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
Mara WEL CAMINO 046210dREAL1. 37015 Not Appilcable Mlxed- Use fail r2"'se 65111Plan ea o
0. Fn Rd° 22vrgle tenantVear matlresssbre- Built 15600. Yea- i; cunentOwned . elk_ Available Nd Used In Prar Hpuvng Element
036
0 360pportuntry site Maximum Density
set by FAR
1 es).
Maximum
dwell) uwis per range precdentOf
promo. MOUNTAIN VIEW
AMINO REAL Od0 1700.. Not Apprlcawe Mixed- U..rn r R()- El Camin eat
0 65111 precise Plan1 -
one- story tena. dayycare center- 0 ear Built)
0 Yes- currentNo PM. ely- Owned Avallawe Notused
In
Peor vng Element M
0 0
66 Opportu. ry sue cersl. set by
FAR 1.).
Maximum dwell)
units per basedrange of precedentjecisa MOUNTAIN
VIEW CTAM0
EL NO REAL0462104
15437006Not Appilcable Mlxe6Use fnnlrR(s)PreclsePlan
045ea 065111 vngle tenanise car wash -FAR 0.1d Year Bulit 1960 tc Yescunent Owned . ely_ Available HO sedln Pnpr uvng 22Element 00 22 Oppontunlry site Maximum ce. 4
set by FAR
185) Maximum drvellIng
units per range dprojectsprecedent
MOUNTAIN VI FIELD
RB 9d0433909 16028aW
Not
Appilcable M edU Mixed -
Use W(
n1)-P
n
recce
Plan
0 ds
0 nedolyv ale tenanitasttood- 198d FARYes 0161currentear Pnv. wilt ely- bin O ed
vala
e
A
Used w In Nd
PMr H °vng Element
0 1] 0
1] Opportu. ry sue Maximum Density set
by FAR 135)
xre showni¢
paseonirg
antisper smog.. herease or
decrease of rots precedent
MOUNTAIN VIEW 9
AMINO REAL W0 EL
0462104
15437007 Not
APPllcable Mlxed- Use fuel 2"-" Real se
Plan
0 65111 0. dory Bogle tenant
frontondare - ear Built 1858
building is not sell martian. boarded up wjedv', sYes- cunent N.-. .12- AvailableN. used In. r.r HoumaElementacre
0 02]
27 oppmtunlrysite Maornurn Density set by
FAR 18s). Maximum
dwelling us.
per shown s based on
therange of precedent moods MOUNTAIN
VI CAMINO REAL
0462104 15431068 Not Applicable Mlxed- use Coro P( 30)-El Camin Real Precise
65111 0 -
Plan 0
one -
gory vr. le tenant fast food - FAR 0. 1, Year Bunt:
1966
Yes
currentNo ely Owned
Avallawe Not used
In
PMr
Ho..Element 0 22
0 220pportu.
ry siteacre Maxtrours Dens. set by
FAR 185) anon
dwell,.
antis
per shown s based on
the range d precedent
mbcts. MOUNTAIN
VIEW alaaW REAL
0411612 14836029 B MlxedLse fnm r R()- El Camin eat
Precise
65111 0Plan 0oneMry vacant, mg.
tenant recall - FAR u' reundsiheu{ arcelat2116aed
00 W EICambp
Real;
2116, 2100, and 2124 W El Canna
Real are
under the same OWnerShIP a Y
s-cunent
0 _
ed . elk_ bin Available In H sad Prar ouvng 0Element331 0 1 darn Opp° ry
siteacre
set Densi. by FAR
18s). Maximum
dwell) uwis
per shown s based the
range on of precedent projects
VI Mddldield 9d333 MOUNTAIN
14712041 Npigpprlcawe General rat zoned for Dec al) Cs 0 43 0Salon
3 edory shoprng center( r..
uranis, Isp space) 0260; dvteYear
Bbeirgunt in nventpNn
rs
nPPortiveYea- cunent Owned .elk_ Avallawe NO used In Pros vng Element Opportunity 0site- 21 0 ebmary 14, 2023 Rezonedb
allow r¢
Ide.
t aapprmdmately- 43 UWacReZala mee nRHgN4t necessary to MOUNTAIN VIEW CAMINO REAL O461612
14e36028 B Mixed -Use Com r R( a)-El Camin eat
Precise
tPlan one- 0 65111 Mry
vacant. vrgle tenant
recall - FAR 19., chaln link 0sur]
reunds Nel{ a elsat2116aed 00WEI CaminpReal;
2116,
2100, and 2124 W El Canna Real
are anger
the
yen cunent 0 _ed . elk_
bin Available H Pnpr sad In ouvng Element 60Oppprtuniry 60siteacre 0 0Maximum censity set byFAR 18s). Maximum dwein
units
per
shown s based on the
range d Precedent projects
HCD Sites Inventory Table A
MOUNTAIN VI CAMINOERFAL 940461612 148360Z] B Mixe0- use Cnnl P. 3,), Real Precise 6 Plan 0 65111 0
one- story vacant, single tenant reta11-
ram nnk
e jpininpa741A1i
np Real; 2116,
2100, he same avnel mP
np
under t Real are
yes tune. Np- OwrieOPMalely- Ava.'
Naud. In Prbr
Hpuvng Element
43 0 0
43 Opp dunl rysiteacre
Marenrem censlry set
by
FAR
185% xlmum dwelling units per
on
the
range
ofpreced
precedent projects
MOUNTAIN VIEW 21CA MINDER_ FAL C4a26O5 19304006 Not gppllcable Mlxeduse Coro P( 30)- El Camia
Real Precise Plan
0 4150 0 - one- story vale tenanitlre store - FAR:
0OT1, Year ullt. 1959Oxne.
yes._ curse. 5ely Available Used m Prior
Hpuvng „ seen.,
0 12 0 1 2Oppoduniry site
Marernum Density set
by
FAR
135). Maximum dwelnrg ants per
acre shown rsbased on
the
range
a precedent projects.
MOUNTAIN VIEW 223M.. Blvd 940414723 15844004 Not Applicable Mixe2L 0I
Ma.,ee)
se CRA 0 2 0229Ym)-
one- story retell spaces ( freer shop and
FAR : 0669; Year Built 1962;
Iangwmer lssuppmve asite bang In
Inventoryshortfall)
Yestune.
Owned
Available Nap vng used Element In Prbr 0 15 0
OppMn y Site - future
pn b(rezpmng meet RHNAat
MOUNTAIN VIEW 2312 ALM45T 94043 14] 3603] Not Applicable Neigeoborhopd
MIx Lse
CN 0 30 0 nestpry recall( alen, Inwrance' restauran6- FAR: 0211; Year Bu1t1960 Yes-tune. e1Y_
O2544
Available
sad In Prler
Hp vng Element
0 20 O O¢ pnM"IFebrua
p23
ryt0' Rezoned aapprmdmaattely 0DWamial t
t necessa
meet RrvgNA.
ryio
MOUNTAIN VIE 320WEL
CAMINOREAL 0461420 14036001 Not Applicable Mlxebuse COm r P(30)- El Camia
Real Precise Plan
o 65111 0
one- story sungle tenant retailfence surrounds Be ti1969; a chin link Ves- tune .
Pnv. e1YOwned
A vela bl a
Na Usedln Prior
Housing Element
0 24 0
24Oppduniry Siteacre
Dessiry set
by FAR 185). Maximum dwell. uns pr
shown s don the range
of secedent projects.
MOUNTAIN VI CNMINOLRFAL 94046260s 19304018 Not Applicab. Mlxe6use ... or n R( )Precise Plan 0 41-
50 0 0183pVarBetenantlgupr e uIt19] 1 sere- FAR: yes - curse. Ovme4. elV- Available Hp usingse. Element ln Pnpr 0 e 0 60ppduniry site Maximum Density set
by FAR
135) Maximum dwelling onum.. the range
a precedent Projects.
MOUNTAIN VIEW 36. CAMINOWE3REAL 04a1421 14828005 Not Applicable CECR enter) VIImgeorrlho 6. 3)"El Camia
eat Precise Plan
0 65111 0.
spry six-Unt relall ( beauty, Wellness,
xupurrciure, resauranry- FAR O161;
Year ullt 1984
Yes- currentO
eIYw'"
gvallable
Nau se d. In P. ran
Housing Element
0 37 0
W31,
OppMnty see
Zones, of January 2023es
Marernurn Density set
by
FAR
185). Maximum U.velllr Lists perapprmeimately
acre shown s based on
the
range
aprecedent prorec6. Rezoned
la 23
FAR,
allowing fist1111111/ ac. meet
RHRezonIngNAinecessary to MOUNTAIN
VIEW 2483 OLD FIELD MWV
94043-
2330 14711025 C General Mixed - Use CM 0 43 134 story
restaurant.. M..1. ot. 973,
0384;
aYear oth
2483 and team vacancy UgmaWaywhich have iho same ow Ve
stune. wri .
ec e1y gvallable O H
sedln Element Pri0r 48puvn9 0 O 40 Oppdunry Sue MOUNTAIN VIEW 24. IEFFIIELD WY
94043-
2316 14711029 C General Mixed - use C. 0 43 050 oneaory" vcalntserene/ light industrial Year
tenlantvacancy
sgns0 375, tb. 2483152 warn
M24414l2 Wahave sold
iM
Same
ownershlp YesVe
Pnv. e1V- Owned
Avalaae
6. usedl3 Pray Housing
Element 18
0 0 1 e
fun Nto si OPp MOUNTAIN
VIEW24. OLD My SD D1EFIELD 0412316 147, 034 Applicable General Mixed - Use CM 0 43 O. one- story sale tenant liquor store - FAR: O. 160, Year yid: 19]] Yes
tune. Pnv. ely- Owned
vela
M a Na A
used In Prior rynvng
Element 0
20 0 20 oppduniry site MOUMAIN
VIEW CAMINO REAL O4a13W 14821000 Not Applicable Mlxeduse Center P(40) San
nlo
58 Precise Plan
0 65 O
01] Sov veletenaniuIrestaua. - i. FAR ear 1901 Yescunem Ovmed alely- gvallable Hp sedln Element Pnpr0vng 2y 0 29 Oppduniry Sue Density set by
FAR 235).
Maximum . waling us.. acre
shown s based on sore..
Increase or .crease of
r.. nci' s
precedent MOUNTAIN
VIEW 33. W 63
REAL040- 1117 14816015 du gppllcable ECR Wageorr 6.Center) 3- EI
353356 Real
Precise Plan 0
65111 0_ sto
bank that is pad of a
multis
plrg center - FAR 019,Year Buia.
19] 2
Yes -
current Pnv.
el w'
n
Owned y Ayala. Na use. ln Prior H
pvng Element 0
6 0 84601 my Site- or
Ja31,
2023 nary
Maremum
Density set by
FAR 18.
5)
xlmum
dwell mg us.
per
reshown
ls based on range a
precedent Projects. Rezoned
823FAR, allowing aRpprmdmately
65- 111 MSc mend
RHgNAt necessary to MOUNTAIN
VIEW C AUFORNw ST0461206 14815018 Not Applicable Mlxeduse Cnm P( 40) Sand Pre Plan
0 6389 onestory recall ( laundrpm., convenience auto
pads)- FAR 0193, Year ads 1900
yes -
current e1y
O -
ed xn
gvallable H
sad Element In63Prior puvng 0 O 63 Oppdunry Sue Maximum return wit FAR acre5shpwnlls based on iMuna6 Pararange
precedent projects_ MOUMAIN
VI CAMINO REAL 94046111] 14816012 A CRVII eDerr ntr)
Real
PrelCamlan Precise eel Plan 0
65111 1_ onwslory
pharmacy that pad a a
mulii- tenant
shopirg center- average FAR: r
a045554 stes at 2630 W E1
al2
Fayade D.Ne(
APN 13))
year Bum: 1972, pad aa
site
vnih common 0wners. with
potential todevelop as one project Yes -
current 80 Pnv. el y
Owrie0
mu..
Na
use. ln Prior No
using Element 0
22 0 Opp0r2nry
Rae - pned
es January 31, 2023es Maximum
Deesity set by
FAR
18. 5)
xlmum dwell) unl( sper rest
nls bawd on range aprecedeniprolecis.
Rezoned
b23FAR, allp%ng apprm.
matety 65-111 Dtac RezorenHg
at necessary to meetR
MOUNTAIN
VIEWCAA uFORNw sT040- 1205 14015021 Not Applicable Mlxeduse Cnrrl 0( 40)- San
Preclw gbnip Plan
0 6389 O. restaurant OC9
vrgleYear Built: tenantrest 1964 99; y
escurreru Oxne0 . ely Avalane Na
usedln Pnpr Hpuvng
Element 0
24 O 24 OPpdunry site Ma
mom Density set by
FAR 185).
Maximum dwalli unB per Ofrange
precedent MOUNTAIN
VIMB FIELD 9f043- 3910 16026007 Na Applicable mixeduse an P( 41)- East
nPrec6e WMan
0 45 1. cant site chain mfr. mcture link orfence surround reproveme. sthe vie; is present a
YescurrentOwned Np-PrN. ely- swam. wdln Pnpr N
sing Element 0
3] 0 31OppdunTy site Marernurm
Density wet by
FAR 5612
shewnlsbawdU pnlrgunits per aropodanal
Increase or . sece. ntcrease rays Protects
MOUMAIN
VIEW WEL REAL3u3AMINO 0f626O6 1500s113 Not Applicable MlxeM1use Cnm. or P( 30)- El Camia Real
Precise Plan 0
di- 50
0 nestpryvrgle tenant restauant - FAR 0.
146; year Built 1980 yescurrent No - .
el7 Own..
Avaiable
Na
Usedln P. Hound
Element 0
13 0 1 3
OP...
sea Density
set by
FAR 135)
Maximum dwell...per range
Of
precedent prole. MOUNTAIN
VI FIELD RD
940413909
160z8005 Not Applicable East mixed -
use an W( 41)-East
nPrec
se Plan 0
45 365 story09sngle tenant restaurant/ deb FARO ear Butt 1980 yescurrent No - ately- 0,/,"
ed Avalla5W
used
In Pnpr H
sing Element 0
14 0 14 Oppodun5 site Marenum
Density set by
FAR urn
acre
shownbased. shxwn uni8pr sbased pna appdanal acre
increase sor .crease mrrct' precedent Koreas
MOUNTAIN
VIE MD MIDDLEFIELD 16028306 Notgpplicable MIxe6
use W(
41)-
East Pan
n Precise 0
45 O. one- storyvrgle tenantresUumnndel FAR.
0. ear Built 1980 vas
current No -
Pnv. e1Y- O,
ned gvallable
Usedln
Pnpr Hound
Berne. 0
3 0 3OppdunitV site pi
Den.. Density
set
by
FAR
unB
Par s 135). ...
based on a
0rppolre
own read or decrease rwEs
precedent Protects
MOUNTAIN
VIEW Aus_ umO RD 040- 1212 14815017 Not Applicable Mlxed- Use tom P( 4O)- San
Precise 0
A.. Planvng 63E9 O. estpry medaalpeass- FAR: 0290. year Buie: 196s Yescurrent No - y .
alely- Owned
A
Ibl vela
e
Not
Used In Pnpr H
Element 0
32 0 32 OPpdunry site Maxium
185) dwtbVFAR Mammum Maximum un6 dwelling per a shown
is based on the range
a
precede.
projects. MOUNTAIN VIEW
33WEL REAL MIND15801001 Of0 Not APpaable SCR VIImgDernd0r Center) PrRai Camlan se cal Plan Prec 0 65111 O O2] svryva le tenanitlre 1965 yes. store - FAR: current es mint Ownedsated- AvalWne Na Usedln Prior Hp vng Element 0 21
O Opp... sueRezoned asp.,
January 31 2023
b y
FAR
185). Maxemurn
dwell,. units per re shown
s based on the range
Of
precedent
Projects. Rezoned a
appresimaattelV.- Mallg meet Ing
notnecessary to MOUNTAIN VIEW
318...Blvd 94043 15326006 Notgpplkable MlxedL rr
Ma., e.
CPA 0
2 0 2Yrgle story me. ical ogee- FAR : O2T1; year Bum:
1950 yes - current
No Ovine. .
elyAvallaae H used In 0Pnpr8ouvng Element 0 opprwnry sae - future not needed
et
HNA shortfall) me
HCD Sites Inventory Table A
MOUNTAIN VIEW MO FIELD 940f3 16052a1a Not Applicable Ea. WhismanW(n1)- EaP Mixed - Use plan n recce 0 112 2 one-story llgnEnduanal - FAR 03Y3,
Year Bolt 9.
yes current No - Pnva( eryOwn. A vaia a a
Na used lnprbr
Housng ES..
150 10 0 168. 999Mni4 site
censiry set
by FAR
xre' all aunits per
m
5oa... ling
aoportlpnallncreace r0 n
is precedent ordecrease
Projects
MOUNTAIN VIEW M tEFIELD
RD
0464028 16052a11 Not Applicable
Mixed Use W4s)- Ea. recise
Plan
a 112 a. one- story light Industrial - FAR : 0357,
year Bud 982
V es - tune m
No - aelyOvmed
Available HO sing usedElement In Pnpr 72 a a 20ppoituniry Sit Magmurn Density set
by FAR
honMaxs bsedonguM(s per
acre
shown sMwns
Eased
on proportional
Increase or decrease of
r dist.. precedent Pmlects
MOUNTAIN
VI FIELD RD
94 0414067 16052012 Not Applcable Med- use an W( 41)-
East 151408e Plan 0
112 1 5story light olustnal- FAR: 0339, Year
Bum: 1959 es -
m curse Y No -
aely- Ovme2
Avanabe
H
sea ES.. iSPrbr84sing 84
a
0 84 Opponunlry Site murn
Density set by
FAR 25)
Maxlmum4wellingunib per acre
shown s based on Increase
or decrease district'
precedent s smilar MOUNTAIN
VIEW 3845AN ANTONIO
RD 940461214 14815022 Not APPlrcable MI%e8-
Usepmdor P(40)-San
precise Anbnio plan
a
6369 8. 03stpearry Pugle Vear Built tnan 19]thank - tFAR: 52; Yes - Current Owned Privately- AvaiWae Na used In Prior Housing Elemem 50
0 0 58 OPPonuniry Site Max
mum Denary set by
FAR
acre
s Maximuarn ewelllnrangeer rangeOf
Precedent projects. n MOUNTAIN
VIEW 40WE9 CAMINORFAL 90 040
15801002 Not Applicable CEMon.- Use Illagen entry
P(
M)-
El Camlm RealP
ecse Pan a
65111 a OZIstVry stgun. letenan( 1965tlrestore- yes FAR ear cunem 0 aely- Available H
sed ElememIn8Pnor ouvng 12 a O Murry of January 312023
Maginurn
Density set by
FAR 185)
xlmum duelllrg units per acreshown
Ls based on the
range of
precedent projects. meet Rezoned
b23
FAR, allowing appmelmately
6S11t W/ ac
omnngnnot
necessary to RFINA
MOUNTAIN
VIEW 6L MOFF 91043 15324016 Not Applicable Mixe0. LLse Corridor CN a 72 1. one- story 4-una commercial ( sM1op)- beauty, FAR : maitMgun 0156 Year Bunt i 9 Yescunem aely- N. Owned Available d.
Er.. Opp° Mnity H
ss ElememIn 82puvng 0 a Sit ebmary
14, 2023
Rezonedballrnv
residential at aRpepr°
ari mately- 72 DWac. meet
RHNAi necessary to MOUNTAIN
VIEW Rd MiMleti 94a43 16a52021 Not Applicable Eastwhisman mseduse W( 45) P
ise Plan
a
147- 169 aaa story
Iig9ht InMMna1 bunang- FAR: one- story Bud 1991; previous app... for readentlal development wiMmwn
due to ni.
ric agmflscance
of adjacent st YescurrentOwneO Pnvaely- N. M. Na
used In PMr Hpuvng
Elemem 15a
15a 139 43 0uspoduessSit urn
cessiry set by
FAR 35) mMaeimum dxelnng um(s
per re25244
precedent isprojects EaseMOUNTAIN donrange a
VIEW 401 ELLIS ST 041. 43 1. 58017 G Eastd- Use Mixed - use P( 41)-
East PrecisePlan
an
0 112 4. 51
story
office building- FAR: 0 519, year
Bunt 19.. Approved development agreement
irKludesdempmion of N¢
hang
for revdential development In Phase
1(expected by 2026) Yes --
current owne0 aely AvaiWae Nausedln PMr Hpusin
gEtmem 0
0 450 4 Oppoduno Site- Park
Master
an
Plan
Maximum
Denary set by
FAR 35).
Numbera Dwelnng units used
on approved Master Plan. MOUNTAIN
VI MI FIELD 94 0464006 16053006 Not Applicable Mi
e,
use an W( 41)- E0P
a
ham.
recce anWge 14]- 169 1 e- story light industrial - FAR : 0307, Year Bud 1966 V
m curse No - esaely- Owned
vaia
Im aNot A
Used In Pnor Housng
ES.. 110
a 0 1100ppoduess sit Maxmum
cessiry set by
FAR 35).
Mad mum dwelling its per
acre
shown s based on the of
ec. ent promo, MOUNTAIN
VIEW M LEFIELD RD
940464032
16053005 Not Applicable Mixed
use W(
41)-
EaP
n
remsePlan
0 147- 169 129 ne- stp
MlnMstnal/
FARa333V agerky service ce ear
Built l9]] V
m curse Pnvael- es - yOvmed Avanable Ho sedln ElememPray139uvng a 0 90Pportuniry sit Max cemidxel057 FAR 35) mManmum igunit2Per ns
based on the
range of
Precedent Projects. MOUNTAIN
VIEW 475 ELLIS ST 94043- 2203 leasao11 N a
Applicable M
44u se s -W`
hs)
rn5APrecse Plan
0 112 4 Ve- eory 7,lgMlndustnal-FAR 0335 ear 966 Yes- cunem 0 - 24 Avanable ately- wn H sed Elememin150 Pnor pone 150 52 35 2.
9POMnity Sit Maxrmurn
Density set by
FAR acre)
shown sba alOinn aum(s per
prirsep
ncFAreasear decrease rs
Precede. MOUNTAIN r
VIEW 69gOFFEfT 94043- 4727 15849002 Not Applicable rased - Use Cnmdm C. 0 72 096 gas statbn- FAR: 004. Year Bunt 1968 Yes- currentNOwned aely- Mad. NHoa use4ln mePnorm0using48 Ele 0 Opportunity Site - future ezonirg( rezoning
not needed b
meet RMA martially MOUNTAIN
VI
FIELD RD 043-
2243
1..016 G Mixed use W(41)-
East
nprecise Plan 0
112
584 story office
building- FAR: 0 537; Year Bud
19., Approved development agreement lrcludes
demolition of ihs Idirg lorrevdential2ovelopmem
In Phase 1 (
expected by 2126) Yes - current
N. Owned "' Avanable H sed In0prior. 0Housing Elemem 400 4 Op... Site- e Mastr PlanbeofDMaster Park Maxmum
Density
set by FAR
35). Number
of Dxelling units ssd on
approved Plan. MOUNTAIN VIE
W ss
FarthllU Dme 2013043- 16001011 Not Applcable Neighborhood Commercial P(32)- Evandale
0 43 1 two- storyhotel an fivepropeM owner structures- FAR ear has expressed u , In resiaenoal development scurrentNo V - pnvael- y Owned Avanable
Na
used
In Prior ueueeg Elemem
0 34
0 Oecp ortuniN
site - fut,re b(r¢
pmnng' no NApre et shortfall) MouNTAwvl
A
Eveyn venue 16o6soa994a41 Na Appucabt Riges9cemalry R4 0 80 a 56 estorry1950; inausinallgarage vanparking laFout puanased by affordable housing developer Yes- cunem
aety- wn
owned
Ayala.
N.
H
sea
In
42Pnor. 0ouvng Elemem 0 OPPPM0F sae - February14,
2023 Rezoned
from
MM to R4 MOUNTAIN
VIEW
WEL CHMINORFAL 19303. 0462641 4
Not Applsabe Mixe0. Use Cnmdm P(30)-El
Camira Real Precse
Plan 0 41-
50 0
e- stpryve yesl tenantcPaintstore - FAR: 026year uin1981 seeet aely OwneO Avaiable
Na
used
In Pnor Housing Etmem
012
0 1 OP... sae Density set
by FAR
135).
Maximum
duelling on. per acre shown
s based on toe range
Of nt
promo. MOUNTAIN VIEW
CAB SAN ANTONIORD 14816017 940461304 Not Applicable Mixe0. Use Corr P(40)- San Pbell° Preerse Plan 63E9 0
1 e- storyv9' Veetenant bank - m FAR: 0222: yea44ul. as- aely- Owned curse A
bl
vaia sed a In
0 Pnor Houyng325505t 61
0 610Pponunity site Madmumecersiry set
by FAR
1a5). Maximu4Wrelli
5410519r ofPrecedent
Projects MOUNTAIN VIEW
RENGSTORFF AV 940462105
15437009
t Applicable Mixe0. Use Corri R`eal) PrecsePlan 0 66111 o 6a onestory fuur- laundry) unit nt,bial rumrestaurant, FAR beauty, 0 Year Btt 1974vng v1acant, yeacurrentOwned
aely- Avanable N. 999In Prior blouson Elemem
030
a M Oppoituniry Site Magmurn Density
by FAR acres ow
umbased onervo nththeunitsrange per re stuwnls of Projects
MOUNTAIN VI
CAMINO REAL 04625ae 150a6006 Not Applicable Mixe0. Use Coro rp( 38)- Ecamlyd Real Precse
Plan 0 41
set a
story single
tenant car service ulldg- FAR
a 159, Year Burn building Kna
yell maimairu0/ boar0. d upnon..
y
m
es - aely- Chemed tune
vaia
a
used APMr Ia
Housng Elemem
0 9
0 90ppoduniry siteacre 4ecedent Density
setby FAR
35) x
um dwelling umtu Per shown s
based on the range
of
prec.
ent project. MOUNTAIN VIEW
ANTONIIO RD 94a40 1481M16 E xe0. Use
Corridor pVllmge P(
30)
El
Camim Real Precse
Plan 0 65111
2 - e- story vacant, si rgt tenant grocery stare- R02., ear Bunt 972 Yes cunem
Privately- Owl. Available
used
In
norHwang d Element P
150 20
a 1 Opp° MMniry SiJ- p a
312023
January Maximum Density
set by FAR
185) Maximum
dwellingunits per re shown
is based on range of Precedent
promo, n Rezonedb23 FAR,
allowing aapprogrnately 65-
111 Mac. meet Rezorinngnecessary
toMOUIVAIN VIEW
Evelyn Avenue i6o6500294041 N Not HigM1
cemiry Residemu 0R4 80 1 68 oneto
two-story Iight Industrial with muliple tenants;
same tenant spates available VearBui
2 purchased by
affordable houvng eloper es -
tune
Er."- Y m Owned Avaiae Na bl used
In Prior. blouson Element
126 0
0 1 spa . Sae - b February
lb, 2023 Rezoned
NM
R4o MouNTAIN ezon VIEW rum
785 CASTRO ST 94041- 2013 158a9009 Not Applicable re nMlxed- PP( 19) sea reci 500
0 e- aory19vacant oftces- FAR .
030, Ye emn- Downtown Vescurrent
owned
aely- Avanabe us Hong Elemem
0 a
a 80ppoduniry Sue MOUNTAIN VIEW
CAMINO REAL 0462833 190a1a03 t
Applicable Mixe0. Use Cnm rR( 8)-
El
0Camim 65111 eat PreclsepWn 4 9 m
other
ref. «mast - AR0electo275, Y
rNEui eaoppoduniry Nan
area t yes- O -
M ' vat"' Own.
Available
H
sad In 55Pnpr. 0ovng Elemem 0 5 SOppoituniry site Maxonurn Dens. set by FAR
185)
Maximum
Mellon unit per acre sMwnls
based on range of precedent,
ects h
HCD Sites Inventory Table A
MOUNTAIN VIEW BOO MAUCE AV 940434022 16057012 G
M ix -edu se
w(
41)- EamnPrecse
Plan
o 112 4
9]
three Mee spaces veth trqusinal uses -
9. Year Buin: 1968; Approved
development agreement Includes
of
a
port. mints properly to
the Cry
ryfo dousing In Phase)
expected byn2026))
Y escurrent
won
Owned Availabe Not u`-
9 gElement In Prbr 179 0 0 1 G rMma el Park 31te- Master Plan
Maxmum enslty set
by
FAR
5). Number 02 Gxelnngoohs
sea on approved Master Plan.
MOUNTAIN VIEW MIMMONTEAV 0412514 18902024 Not Appllcable Mixed - Use Cnm r R( )near precise Pan 0 65- 111 O. 0O81voV veletenantamO ui re2lr- FAR: t.1563Yes- Owned alelY- Availabe Ho vngsedlnElement Pnor 0 15 0 15 OPP06uniry site um cereTy set
by FAR
es). Maximumdwell unl6 rangeper
of precedent Projects. n
MOUMAINVIEW 815 MAUOEAV 940454021 16059ao1 Not Appllcable East WhIsman
Mixed use
W(
41)-
Eam
n
Prec5e
Plan
0 112 0. oneslorycchu honlce- FAR. O21, Year
Butt: 1
yes current OwnedPnvately- A vaia bl a
Not used In Prbr
Ho slog Element
72 0 0 2Opporcuniry Site
Denary set
by
FAR
25) Maximum dxeling urea per
acre shown Is based on
aoporclonal Increase or decrease
Protect.. rd n
is precedent
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA MINORFAL 0462836 16110009 Not Appllcable Mlxeduse Coro rR(.1)pE recce
an
PI 0 65111 1
37(
onerestauanl, story fourunlicommemlal beauesalon, cheoactors FAR: 0235Year ullt, 9] 1
P )-
Ves- cunem n
Own.
gvailade Used
In deer H
Os. Element 6
0 0 60 Opportudry site Masrouro
censidset by FAR eSY %
Imum dwelllrg unlBper acre
n a
based
on the
range of
precedent Projects. MOUNTAIN
VI CAMINO REAL 046280] 1900] 003 Not Apo,. MixeM1use Coro r P( 30)-El Camlm Real
Precse Plan o
6511, 0 tenant
raumnt- FAR eon
Year YryvBut: uilt. OO9S 1568 Yes
current alely
Owned
Avaeade
Used
In Pnor Houvng
Element 0
14 0 1
4Opporcuniry siteacre Masmum
cerslty set by
FAR 185Y
Masao. dwell) unla per shown
s based the of range n
precedent protects. MOUNTAIN
VIEW 830 Leong Dome 94043- 2062 15319003 Not Applcable Cemmbercaled aP( 32)-
Evandale 0 43 0] 8
gas stallon- FAR: 0O61; Vear Bum: 1973 Yes- current0 wonedmety Avaade H sedln Element Pnor0vng 23 0 OppaMmry Ste - future rennIng
not edezonitemeet HNAR ( shortfall) MOUNTAIN VIEW
CAMINORFAL
0462807 19807004 Not APPlbable Mix. - Use ...or nC. d R( Plan3)Precise 065-111 1 FARVO23 nyetenant usedgoods rel.- ear yes current BulL, Ol 566 Pednvately- Avaeade Ndusedln Prior Ho vng Element 58 0 0
58 OpPortudry Sae Maxenum Denary set
by FAR 185).
Maximum dwelling
15150# rnthe range
Of
Precedent Projects.
MOUMAIN VIEW 835
MAUVE AV 940434021 16059002 Not Appllcabte Ea. Whernan Mixed - use W(
41)-da9
nPreclse
Ran 0112
000
ei 0
lgMlndumnalOnee- 966FAR: 0381 yesear current alely- Built, Owned A d
vaia
e Used Nm In
Prbr H slog Element
70 0 0
O OpponunTy site censiry set by
FAR 25)
mMaelmum dweling
ud6 per acresMwnsbased based. aoporclonal
Increaseor
decreasePrecedent Prott... rdMOUNTAIN VIEWMret's
8. Leong Dolve. 022 1531. 02 Not Appllcable Colghb° rh°°d mmercial EvandaleP( 32)- 0 43 136 N' OVOry hotel - FAR:03]9; Year Bolt. 19] 3 yescurrent NoL.
Pnvately- Avaeade Nd Usedln Prior Houvng Element 0 37
0 3]
re.,( rezomnng' mt OppaMnlry
Site - future shortfall)
me H NA
MOUMAIN VIEW
ass MAUVE
AV 940434021 160s9003 Not Apo,. Mixed - use W( 41)-
Ea. P
nPrecse
an 0
112
0 emoY
IgMlndumnalOnice- FAR: 0369 mery-( ea18unli96625) Yes current mMaelmum Owned Avaeade H 54[
651nor
slog Element 076 60OpponunTy site cerslry set by FAR
dwelling ud6
per roc
p09055sbased based. aopomonal
Increase Mordecrease
ec;lar0 r .
precedent
MOUNTAIN VIEW 870 Leong
Dove 940432062 15319001 Not Applcable Nelghborhoed Commercial P(32) - Evandale 0 43
1 - cant lot with a gatearoundn- FAR O0] 2; Year Buin yes current PMalely Owned Available
Nol Used PriorIn Houvng
Element 0 36 0
070004nlry Site -
future ezoniedrg( rezonlnngtmt meet NA shortfall)
MOUNTAIN VIEW e] S
MAUCE
AV 940434021 1fA59004
to ppllcable East WhIsman M edu ix
use W11(
4) PrEa. Plan
0 112
0 -
FARm039vacant
hunt
Inumnal office Vear Brae4Oppontumry oen, ately slog yes -current AvailableH Used In Poor Elementaopomonal 74 0Denary 0 site set by FAR 25). sMaelmum dweling
ud6 per
Increase acre shown or decrease m;slar0 based on
ris precedent
Protects. MOUNTAIN VIEW
885 MAUOE
AV
94043 16059005 G WhIsman ix - ec M edu
P(
nPrecse 41) Plan dd.
0 112 109
v
nglemory Industnal bud,
FAR:
Year Butt: t563; ApprovedEa. development0465
Tan agreement Includes 58f theCry a
port.. 660)
91 5765opety
to
expected byB2026)) ry fordousing In YPhase es -1 current No _alelY_ Clamed
Availabe H
sed In
Prbr
ovng Element1159Ot 0 09Wda site- el Park Master Panset, YMaxmumcenslty FAR 25).
Number 02Uwelnng unts based
n aPPrwed Master Plan.
MOUNTAIN VIEW aacLd, NO REAL
04628W 1.07000 t Appllcable MixedUse Coe r Ra)- EI Carr nl precise Plan- 111 00 65- onestory rental car brat.- V FAR Dry vrgle tenant ren Year Built 196O _es- ed cunem merywon Available ry Prbr Used In ovng Element 20 Opportudry 20 0 siteacre Masmurn cersltywtbyFAR 185). Maximum dwell)
Lists, shown
s based on the
range f precedent projects.
MOUNTAIN VIEW
897 Leong Dove
94043- 2042 16001009 Not Applcable Commencledaled P( 32)- Evandale 0 430
onestorybased12759
gs vacant and In
poor cond..- FAR: 0
Year ui Yes- Owned melt'- Available
Ho sedln Prbr
ovng Element 0 6 0Ste - Oppo. nrar futureezonrng edb( rezone. not meHRHNA shortfall) MOUMAIN
VIAV MOM 1700007940462319
Not
Appllcable xeduseelndor 0ECRVIIage enter) P( 38)- El2aminlo Real Precse
PlanIvgh 0
65-
111 1
e-mo0ryvngletenantonaesupP store
Rah po; Vearrat1952; ce
eel oPPotunity area
and isadjacent toyes -current Owned Ing reside mltAvailable H 19[ 651nor vn9 Element 66 0 0 OfOpportunely January Ste- 31,. 23 Mml mum Plenary setby
FAR 185)
Maximum dwelllg unl6 per
range mMaxenum
precedent Rezoned b23 FAR, a8pprosrnatelyallovnng
65-
111Cu/
roc. nl Hg. t
necessary to MOUNTAIN VIEW
975
BAY ST 940462626 19314001
Not Applcable CECR VIIagemdo Center) PR( 38)- El Cams No PreciseReal Plan 0 t9self car 65111 O.wash - 9vngletena' FAR: O095; Year BU It yescurrent Owned melt'- AvaiableHot Used Eement 0
2.3 0 OppoMdry Site- 3¢ 7ednof January
23 cemiry
set by
FAR 185). dwell) Maximum
acre shown
s
based
ongun) yraapprmlHatel, nece1a
mprecedent palec6. Rezoned b23 FAR, albwng 111
Maw. ry to
mniR MOUNTAIN VIEW FAYETTE
OR 1481 040 fA13
A
Mixed -use err P^ 40) - San Aryans Precise Plan 0 63- 09 a-.
lot (parking serving
adjacent
multi - tenant
reallyaverage
FAR: 0. 15 far alp ring
es at 2630 W
El Can. Peal and
Fayette
Unve( APN14oTIc); VearBun: Not Applcable ( ra
bdldlrg of aonconsolidated site); sae wthFad common ohot with potential
to
developas one sproject Yescurrent V O _ d melt- won Available sed H invng Prar Element 0 0 a4
opPartphlry set sitebyMaximum Density FAR 185). Maximum dwell) hunter Per restawnls based
on range
ofVIEW FAYETTE precedent ORpajeca. 040 n1481.MOUNTAIN
14 E Mixed -use
eon P(40)-San Precise Plan 0 63- 09 0. arking lot(
serving adjacent retail) -
FAR:
Year EWE
Not Appleable( noasset"- building el- onOwned Yvte) yes - A valIadcurrent a Nnvng
Element
Net usedln
Pa.' 0
0 00, 30niry site Maximum cerslty set
by FAR per
G..). twwnllsbaserouro dwell. untse acre ofprecedent projects. MOUNTAIN VIEW Monett Blvd 043 1532.05 Not
Appllcable Mmed-)se
en)Corr.. CRA 0 2 0l a Parking for N/A ,
532fA05- FAR: WA; year BUlit N/A
Yes -current
Owned
In Prat ovngmelt- Available Ho Used Element 0 9
0 OppaMnlry Ste - future meet notneededm coned to H NA MOUNTAIN VIEW NwrvISMAN RB 94o43
WhIsman 1602e003 N Ea. M edu
ww1) Fameclae 9 4s a 96: 60:
01W Density
set by
FAR well. Appllcable won set y
FAR
of
precedent Projects.
n
Resolution No. 18781
HCD Sites Inventory Table B: this is intentionally blank HCD Sites Inventory Table C
Zoning Designation
From Table A, Column G
and Table B, Columns L and N
e. g., „ R- 1 „)
eneral Land Uses Allowed ( e. g., " Low -
density residential')
CN
Neighborhood - serving commercial ( Residential mixed - use added February 14, 2023) -
https:// library. municode. com/ ca/ mountain_ view/ codes/ code_ of_ ordinances? n odeld= PTIITHCO_ CH36ZO_ ARTVCOZO_ DIV4COIGCNZODIST
CO
Small offices -
https:// library. municode. com/ ca/ mountain_ view/ codes/ code_ of_ ordinances? n odeld= PTI ITH CO_ CH36ZO_ ARTVCOZO_ DIVSCOFICOZODIST
CRA
Multi - family residential up to 43 DU/ ac, office, commercial, hotels, etc - https:// library. municode. com/ ca/ mountain_ view/ codes/ code_ of_ ordinances? n odeld= PTIITHCO_ CH36ZO_ ARTVCOZO_ DIV6CORETECRZODIST
CS
Commercial services, such as auto repair and contractors ( Residential mixed - use added February 14, 2023) -
https:// library. municode. com/ ca/ mountain_ view/ codes/ code_ of_ ordinances? n odeld= PTI ITH CO_ CH36ZO_ ARTVCOZO_ DIV7CORVCSZODIST
R4
Residential up to 80 DU/ ac -
https:// library. municode. com/ ca/ mountain_ view/ codes/ code_ of_ ordinances? n odeld= PTIITHCO CH36Z0 ARTIVREZO DIV6HINSR4ZODIST
P( 19)- Downtown Precise Plan
Downtown Mixed Use ( commercial, office, multi - family residential) - https:// www. mountainview. gov/ civicax/ filebank/ blobdload. aspx? BIobID= 29700 P( 27) - Grant - Phyllis Precise Plan
Shopping center ( commercial); General Plan allows residential up to 1. 85 FAR Residential mixed - use added February 14, 2023) -
https:// www. mountainview. gov/ civicax/ filebank/ blobdload. aspx? blobid= 2773 P( 32)- Evandale Precise Plan
Various. Area A ( location of sites) allows neighborhood commercial and hotels - https:// www. mountainview. gov/ civicax/ filebank/ blobdload. aspx? blobid= 2776 P( 38) - El Camino Real Precise Plan
Multi - family residential up to 1. 35/ 1. 85/ 2. 3 FAR ( depending on area), office, commercial, hotels, etc -
https:// www. mountainview. gov/ civicax/ filebank/ blobdload. aspx? BIobID= 29701 P( 39) - North Bayshore Precise Plan
Multi -family residential up to 1. 85/ 3. 5/ 4. 5 FAR ( depending on area), office, commercial, hotels, etc -
https:// www. mountainview. gov/ civicax/ filebank/ blobdload. aspx? BIobID= 29702 P( 40) - San Antonio Precise Plan
Multi - family residential up to 1. 85/ 2. 35 FAR ( depending on area), office, commercial, hotels, etc -
https:// www. mountainview. gov/ civicax/ filebank/ blobdload. aspx? BIobID= 29703 P( 41) - East Whisman Precise Plan
Multi -family residential up to 1. 85/ 2. 5/ 3. 5 FAR ( depending on area), office, commercial, hotels, etc -
https:// www. mountainview. gov/ civicax/ filebank/ blobdload. aspx? BIobID= 32005 DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis Resolution No. 18781
Sites for Emergency Shelters
Pursuant to AB2339 ( Government Code Section 65583( a)( 4) and ( 7)), the City must identify sites and zoning districts for emergency shelters.
The land area need for emergency shelter sites is based on the latest point -in -time count ( published in the 2022 Santa Clara County Point -in -Time Report on Homelessness, from Applied Survey Research and the County of Santa Clara), any pipeline funded rapid rehousing and permanent supportive housing units in the City, and a ratio determined by State law. These are summarized in Table 70 below. It should be noted that this is a conservative estimate since the units in Table 70 may be expected to house more than one person.
Table 70: Need for Emergency Shelters
2022 Point - In - Time Count ( Unsheltered) 206
Pipeline Rapid Rehousing and Permanent Supportive Housing 174 See Table 71)
Remaining Need 32
Land Area Needed ( based on 200 sq. ff per person) 6, 400 sq. ft.
Table 71: Pipeline Rapid Rehousing and Permanent Supportive Housing Project Units
Crestview ( 901 E. El Camino Real)
Lot 12
1265 Montecito Avenue
1 100 La Avenida
1020 Terra Bella Avenue
1012 Linda Vista Avenue
96 W. El Camino Real
Total Units
20 20
41 30
27 16
20 174
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis 350 Resolution No. 18781
The following site can accommodate an emergency shelter and is greater than 6, 400 square feet. 860 Bay Street, APN 158-01-039
This is a vacant 10, 900 square foot site in the El Camino Real Precise Plan. It has excellent access to transit, since it is 550 feet walking distance from a VTA route 22 stop ( the most frequent service in Santa Clara County) with service to Downtown Mountain View and other major commercial and job centers throughout the South Bay and Peninsula. It is less than a 1, 500 foot walk to two major shopping centers with groceries ( Nob Hill, 99 Ranch, Nijiya), a pharmacy ( Walgreens), and myriad other goods and services. It is less than a mile to El Camino Hospital, a major facility with emergency services and Palo Alto Medical Foundation, another major medical facility. Mental health services are provided at the Community Health Awareness Council, less than a half mile away.
Program 1. 1 will rezone the El Camino Real Precise Plan consistent with AB2339, allowing emergency shelters without a conditional use permit and identifying objective standards.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix E: Housing Sites Analysis 351.
N M w ME
N M v NM
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
HOUSING ELEMENT
We
00a
AIR
APPENDIX
F
Summary of Public Input
Resolution No. 18781
Countywide Meeting Summary
Mountain View: Introducing the Housing Element Update
let' s Talk Housing
A series of countywide meetings about the Housing Element update were held from August to September 2021. Each meeting offered Spanish -language interpretation and provided community members with an introduction the Housing Element update, why it matters, information on the Let' s Talk Housing outreach effort and countywide trends. Breakout room discussions with individual cities and towns followed.
Who We Heard From
In total 832 registered for the series. Of those who registered for the series, the majority identified as White and over half were 50 years or older. Over sixty percent lived over 21 years within the county, and over half were homeowners.
How long have you lived in Living Situation
Don' t live here
11- 20 years
County?
0- 5 years
21+ years
ADU
3% 5%
6- 10 years
Live with friends or family Own Rent Other
Type of Home
2%
69%
Apartment Single family home Mobile or Manufactured home Other Resolution No. 18781
Countywide Meeting Summary Lei' s Talk Housing
Mountain View was part of the August 30th, 2021 introductory meeting, along with Milpitas, Sunnyvale, and Santa Clara. This meeting offered Vietnamese interpretation in addition to Spanish, courtesy of the City of Milpitas, and outreach for the meeting was conducted in the three languages. Twenty- seven people who registered for the August 30th meeting identified as living in Mountain View. Of the Mountain View participants, half indicated owning their home. A majority of them indicated that they lived in an apartment or condo and one indicated living in a mobile or manufactured home. Half of participants were between the ages of 30- 49 and half identified as White.
What We Heard
Main Meeting
People were asked to share a word in the chat describing housing now at the beginning of the meeting, and the housing they envisioned in their communities ten years from now.
Now In 2030
progressive
attractive
expensive - need more of it
insufficient sunnyvale
unaffordable locking
a insufficient
expensive
unbalanced
divisive
or unreachable nightmare
unequal sunnyvale
challenged
fic ient- unaffordable
challenging - for many
unreachable - dream
0a7
7 0
a
LE
E
dense and neartransit
multi - generational
abundant
dense and high
affordable housing
multi -generational ongested
affordable
dense social
housing for all
Nplentiful community
m >
high rise lots more housing
new meaning of community
0 y
inclusive
vailat!e
housing neartransit
senior housing
English -language Breakout Session
In the breakout session, participants expressed that they valued living in Mountain View. However, they recognized that there is a substantial imbalance between jobs and housing. They also shared a desire for more walkable and connected neighborhoods, particularly in neighborhoods with more affordable housing options like rowhouses. Participants identified parking as an inefficient use of land that contributes to pollution and raises rental prices as well. Ideas to address these needs included rezoning land for five times the City' s allocated RHNA number to build in a buffer since only 20% of the available sites were developed during the last RHNA cycle.
Spanish -language Breakout Session
Mountain View residents participating in the Spanish -language breakout room recognized recent efforts the City has made to boost affordable housing and expressed appreciation for them. At the same time, they acknowledged that much more is needed. They expressed the need for the City to preserve mobile homes, as they are one of the few remaining affordable housing options for many immigrant low -wage workers. Other housing challenges they recognized are the lack of housing Resolution No. 18781
Countywide Meeting Summary Let' s Talk Housing
options for older adults and young people, and the lack of options and services for people who are homeless. Participants pointed out that there often isn' t enough of an effort to engage young people in housing discussions and suggested the City focus on engaging them as well. Among ideas to address Mountain View' s housing challenges were: promoting affordable housing opportunities and removing barriers to apply for them, preservation of mobile home parks, a community or tenant opportunity to purchase program, and a young adult housing program.
Post Event Survey
The post -event survey reflected the variety of opinions present on issues ranging from a desire to preserve communities as they are, to an appeal for more and diverse housing everywhere in the county. Community members responded that they valued the space and the information provided within it and would like to have longer times for such community discussions in the future so all participants can share their thoughts. Additionally, they suggested the City target outreach for future housing element engagement opportunities to the local day worker center and the Mobile Home Alliance.
Resolution No. 18781
Mountain View Appendix
Main Meeting
Questions from Feedback form
NA
Breakout Room Chat and/ or Notes
Questions:
N/ A
Comments
N/ A
Responses to facilitator questions:
What is working in Mountain View? ( In the chat, share a word or two about what you value or love about your community and it' s housing.)
Rowhouses: Nice rowhouses but disconnected - uncomfortable walking environment. Would like to see neighborhoods that are walkable, and also connect to somewhere. This would allow less parking.
I am a part of a housing association that focuses on community organizing. It' s great to be in these kinds of meetings. Mountainview has to add 11, 135 housing units according to the RHNA 2023- 2031 plan. Of those, 2, 773 have to be for very low income houses.
There' s several affordable housing units and Mountainview has mobile parks. Someone in the chat Doris) mentioned this in the chat: she asked if the housing elements can be applied to mobile homes.
If the owner of the mobile home park for personal reasons decides that he has to get rid of the property. That creates anguish because sometimes they are parks of more than 200 mobile homes. I think it is important to think about the needs of these mobile home parks.
2. What are some of our key housing needs, challenges and opportunities? (In the chat, share a word or two about our key housing needs, challenges or opportunities.) A single parking spot can increase rent by $ 3000 per year and also contributes to pollution Need enough development in an area to support businesses, etc., to create more walkable areas Jobs/ Housing imbalance: Google putting up offices, etc.
A lot of offices being built, every office built makes the job/ housing balance worse We' re way behind on park space - City keeps collecting in -lieu fees It seems that 11, 000 additional units is not very high nor is the percentage of housing separated for low income units. What do you think? I think the number is too low - I think the city is trying to help I think the challenges Hispanic families have is the high cost of housing in Mountainview. For example, someone in the elderly, 80 years old, applied for support (to rent an inexpensive apartment) and was asked to have 40 thousand in the bank and that exceeds our ability to pay. She applied to Affordable Housing and was told that she did not have sufficient funds. Hopes are dashed by those high standards Resolution No. 18781
If someone has a good credit history, it should be enough. The two dads - dad and mom - have to work and the children are often left alone in order to pay the rent. Family time is sacrificed.
In Mountain View I see that the city is making an effort to support us but there are obstacles that we must work on to move forward together.
There is a housing program: if someone is going to build, the owner can offer to make the units affordable. I see that as positive. It is working well. There are several elements that I do not know but I
3. What ideas or suggestions do you have to help meet our housing needs? ( In the chat, share any ideas or suggestions you have to help meet our housing needs. ) Only developed 20% of inventory sites in last RHNA cycle, need to zone for 5x RHNA in order to accommodate ( LA model), we should do the same, otherwise rent will keep going up because not Building in a buffer
When an owner decides to sell their property, it would be good if they had contemplated offering the city to work with the city in order to serve the needs of the community. But I see that sometimes they prefer to offer it to other private / for -profit actors. It would be good to enter into negotiations to San Jose has a similar program. It gives the option to NGOs or non- profit organizations. Perhaps Mountain View will be encouraged to adopt something similar.
I am concerned about homeless street dwellers. I want them to have a home. I don' t see it much but once in a while I have seen it near my home. It is not a problem of a single city - it is of the whole My daughter told me that it would be good to have a program for young people who want to be able to save for their housing needs. It is important to involve young people.
4. How can we make sure we hear from our entire community? Neighborhood meetings: neighborhood associations - Reach out to ones you have contacts for that have regular meetings and make sure community knows about plans that affect that particular I think it is important to spread the word. I did not know about this Housing Elements process. As we were told, it only happens every 8 years. Perhaps my colleagues had problems entering through Zoom.
I think there were several steps and it would be easier not to have the registration process but to simply be able to access with a single button. That can help those struggling with technology and with Resolution No. 18781
We use email or whatsapp. The city of Mountain View has a WhatsApp of ambassadors and with great pride I am part of that group. There is another group of "Mountain View High School parents" and I am also part of that group. Churches and other community groups can also help spread the word.
5. What Kind of Housing Do We Have in the Future ( Let' s return to it being 2030, and how we' ve accomplished a lot! In the chat, share with us a word or two about your vision for the housing in our No responses
It' s 2030, and we' ve accomplished a lot! What kind of housing is in our community now? No responses
Resolution No. 18781
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
n n : 1HOUSING ELEMENT
HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE WORKSHOP # 1
September 23, 2021 - 6: 30- 8: 00pm
The purpose of the Housing Element Update Workshop was to provide an overview of the intention, components, and process of a Housing Element Update and gather questions and comments from participants about housing concerns, goals, and characteristics. Feedback received will inform the content of future outreach events, and will guide in preparing the Housing Element Update.
The meeting was held via Zoom on Thursday, September 23, 2021 from 6: 30- 8: 00pm and was facilitated by City staff and the consultant team. Live simultaneous Mandarin interpretation was available, and there were approximately 40 public participants. The format of the meeting is described in the agenda below:
Welcome & Introductions & Live Poll: Demographic Questions Housing Element Update Presentation: Overview of the Project & Process Live Poll: Housing Questions
Small Group Discussion Breakout rooms
Small Group Report Out
Closing and Next Steps
ATTENDANCE
Meeting participants: A total of 60 individuals registered; 38 attended Presenters
City — Ellen Yau
BAE— Stephanie Hagar
Plan to Place — Dave Javid
Consultant Team
BAE — Stephanie Hagar
ESA - Evan Wasserman
Plan to Place — Dave Javid, Paul Kronser, Rachael Sharkland CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 1 Resolution No. 18781
WORKSHOP SUMMARY
Dave Javid and Ellen Yau opened the meeting by welcoming attendees, giving an agenda overview, and opening the demographic live poll ( see results below). After the poll closed, Stephanie Hagar delivered a presentation offering an overview of the Housing Element Update project and process, which was recorded and will be posted on the website for public access.
After the presentation, Dave gave an overview of the small group breakout logistics and opened the second live poll to garner feedback related to housing priorities.
Demographic Poll Results ( Full results in appendix)
Age:
O 36% of the attendees were between the ages of 26- 45; O 29% were between 46- 64;
Race and Ethnicity:
O 50% White
O 32. 1 % Asian
Do you currently rent or own the home you live in?
O 53. 6% Own
O 39. 3% Rent
What type of housing do you live in?
O 46. 4% Home/ Duplex
O 39. 3% Apartment
Which bracket best describes your household income
O 78. 6% $ 100, 000 or more
O 17. 9% $ 60, 000 to $ 99, 999
Which ofthe following describes why you decided to attend tonight's workshop? ( May select more than one)
O 82. 1% I live in Mountain View
O 14. 3% I want to know more about the Housing Element Update Process Housing Poll Results ( Full results in appendix)
How satisfied are you with your current housing situation? O 32% Satisfied
O 25% Somewhat satisfied
How satisfied are you with the affordability of housing in Mountain View? O 46. 4% Dissatisfied
O 25% Somewhat dissatisfied
How satisfied are you with the variety of housing types that are available in Mountain View?
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 2 Resolution No. 18781
O 35. 7% Dissatisfied
O 21. 4% Somewhat dissatisfied
How do you feel about the amount of new housing that has been built in Mountain View during the past few years?
O 46. 4% Too little has been built
O 21. 4% Somewhat too much has been built
How Well do you think Mountain View provides access to housing and opportunity for all segments ofthe population, regardless of race, ethnicity, age, disability, status etc?
46. 4% Neutral
25% Not Well
The majority of the meeting was devoted to gathering input from meeting participants through facilitated small group discussions. Feedback was recorded in a virtual whiteboard in response to the discussion prompts below The summary below provides a high-level overview of themes that emerged from the break- out discussions.
SHARE YOUR THOUGHTSI COMPLETE A HOUSING ELEMENT COMMUNITY INPUT FORM HERE httos.lfbit.lylmvhousinq
53. 7011M E! liI V- 1"{# NWt." 1± t, 4Oii: hthl tit Ivlmvhoustng chint: se 2) What do you think Mountain View should do to address housing needs or goals?/ filiAt! L fnigug{- FA3k1V%A1t #? o. eornagrersollmlarcaswaNn+ rerea tirWino [ e wllr w amslim ihntEarseareas/ N. rmuldmerauereneealRNNomALE hum run + eua. rilel rviel u reLeuaenielfeesLg uses eg cImPPIn0. epee VmamFlR lor5 retell or laiiees b R. anrllne she { 1rY process mellnw Nmes[ o0e acm. ma mare ellikE. 1e111. 4 ape reyurErmeno ror._ w9ewla4rrenurn Irelane Irw. vnrenw arras 1 IlLor. orotaMIMIlAiek' J 4mc m. Nedam p. ymene eau na tolewnwmeerd mledlennme HruadoNs!' 451axWm W[ aR64flkNW, 11,91CI
DISCUSSION
17117,1
mat
rs rurdlB irsaNarme. le F,oa. gprgem r fi7le gfA#® IFM3i l$ nem. enmIXe anus ro rkawrecr ONO eYiM,. NP, MaCh.
Y4rr.v.. nrmusmg prvndersm eras. axe hew, Ice nee... ne 1.. m.../, gA11 E90. 1-', T- F,iR gB9ALT$ ID! FBISM_ 1pnl ruN6inuUng proAEer, fm [ mace more se.: w. ring! SffReCtevei. B hlettA291Ed1. som6men pmrerturc for renters endmr mode home mark. xvrlen5i. W9N1i TRientT' onTlT M4M.
Helmhmnwoaue« wet hume. emelrs. mosenwenttf MeaM3ifl? lliy1011R . hspurvaaeeg. smsria de nrph. r wary lE lP* C1 PAM. 1
CHAT MANDARIN TRANSLATION
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 3 Resolution No. 18781
BREAK OUT DISCUSSION PROMPTS AND SUMMARY
The following questions were asked in each small break out room. Participants were encouraged to raise their virtual hands and offer verbal responses, or could respond via Chat.
The Main Takeaways section below provides a high level summary of responses collected from each of the 3 breakout rooms. The numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of breakout rooms in which the referenced comment was expressed.
Discussion Prompts:
1. What do you think are the most critical housing issues in Mountain View?
2. What do you think Mountain View should do to address Housing needs or goals?
3. What characteristics do you want to see in housing over the next 10 years?
4. What suggestions do you have for Mountain View to solicit additional feedback on the Housing Element Update?
Main Takeaways:
1. What do you think are the most critical housing issues in Mountain View? o We need more affordable housing. ( 3)
o There is a lack of Senior housing. ( 1)
o We need more types of housing at all income levels. (3) o The lack of housing at all levels is largely because it isn' t legal according to planning and zoning code to build at needed densities. (1) o The densities needed to make building housing profitable for a developer aren' t permitted. (1)
o The City should thoughtfully locate new housing units and consider existing housing stock, co -location with jobs and transit. ( 3) o City should concentrate higher density housing in Precise Planned areas / planned communities. ( 1)
o We have an imbalance between office space and housing (office space outcompetes housing). (2)
o Minimum parking requirements, setbacks, and height requirements are too restrictive and prevent housing from being built. (1)
o Concern expressed around buildings 3 stories and higher directly adjacent to single family homes. ( 2)
o We should reduce the costs and time it takes to build in order to incentivize housing at all levels. ( 2)
2. What do you think Mountain View should do to address Housing needs or goals? o Support expressed for exploring rezoning as a strategy to allow for higher densities. ( 3)
o The City should simultaneously plan for more infrastructure when planning for housing (i. e. wider roads, more parks, sidewalks, better connection to public transit, schools and other services). ( 2)
o The City should fund down payment assistance programs. ( 1) o The City should make it easier to develop smaller, infill sites. ( 2) o The City should change regulations, especially parking requirements ( lower or unbundle) to encourage housing construction. (2)
o The Housing element should address the difficulty of production, because lack of supply is one of the main issues. (2)
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 4 Resolution No. 18781
o Concern expressed about parking and traffic congestion. ( 2) o The Housing Element should include non- traditional housing types ( ie. stacked flats, co- ops, and ADUs). ( 2)
o Building new housing is an opportunity for more walkable/ interconnected neighborhoods. ( 1)
o The City needs to do more precise plans, and less broad sweeping changes on rezoning / new construction due to the wide variety of housing types co -existing already. (1)
3. What characteristics do you want to see in housing over the next 10 years? o The City should focus on the mitigation/ elimination of homelessness. ( 2) o Tech companies are one of the main pressures increasing housing costs. (2) o Desire to see corporate/tech neighbors paying for infrastructure, housing, transit and other public services. ( 2)
o Focus on continued support for more diverse demography in Mountain View; diversity is an asset. (2)
o
I would like to see environmentally responsible development ( recycled water, solar etc.). ( 2)
4. What suggestions do you have for Mountain View to solicit additional feedback on the Housing Element Update?
o City should solicit feedback from everyone who works in Mountain View, survey at offices/ employers. ( 2)
o There should be more outreach to renters ( eg. posting ads on Craigslist, mailers in utility bills). ( 2)
o The City should reach out to leverage neighborhood associations. ( 1) o City should try to reach out to future/ potential residents. ( 1) o Please offer Spanish interpretation. ( 1)
o Reach out to Mountain View Day worker center, grocery stores, mobile home alliance, CSA's, rent relief, next door and community forums, connect with different faith communities, and contact authors of
https:// escholarship. orq/ uc/ item/ 6786z5i9 ( 1).
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 5 Resolution No. 18781
APPENDIX
LIVE POLL: DEMOGRAPHIC RESULTS
19 25
Aae
26 45 46 64
21. 4%
28. 6%
65 and over
CITY OF MOUNTAIN Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 6
Resolution No. 18781
2.Race and Ethnicity: ( select all that apply)
White • Hispanic or LatinX • Asian Other
3.Do you currently own or rent the home you live in?
Rent • Own i Other
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 7 Resolution No. 18781
4,What type of housing do you live in?
Apartment • House/ Duplex • Townhome r Mobilehome or manufactured home
39. 3%
46.4%
5. Which bracket best describes your household income?
21, 000 to $44,999 • $ 60, 000 to $99,999 • $ 100, 000 or More Ado1111kill
78. 6%
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 8 Resolution No. 18781
6.Which of the following describes why you decided to attend tonight' s workshop? (may select more than one) I live in Mountain View • I work in Mountain View • I want to know more about the Housing Element Update Process CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 9 Resolution No. 18781
LIVE POLL: HOUSING RESULTS
1. How satisfied are you with your current housing situation? Satisfied ` Somewhat Satisfied • Neutral 01 Somewhat Dissatisfied ! Dissatsficd CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 10 Resolution No. 18781
2.I3ow satisfied are you with the affordability of housing in Mountain View? Satisfied • Somewhat Satisfied • Neutral Somewhat Dissatisfied , Dissatified
3.1low satisfied are you with the variety of housing types that are available in Mountain View?
Satisfied • Somewhat Satisfied • Neutral Somewhat Dissatisfied • Dissatsfeed CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 11 Resolution No. 18781
4.How do you feel about the amount of new housing that has been built in Mountain View during the past few years?
Too little has been built * Somewhat too little has been built • About the right amount has been built Somewhat too much has been built • Too much has been built CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 12 Resolution No. 18781
5. How well do you think Mountain View provides access to housing and opportunity for all segments of the population, regardless of race, ethnicity, age, disability status, etc.? Wcl! • Somewhat well • Neutral
25. 0%
f
Nat very well • Not well
10. 7%
CITY OF MOUNTAIN Housing Element Update Workshop # 1 13 Resolution No. 18781
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
ill ill HOUSING ELEMENT
HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
ONLINE FEEDBACK FORM SUMMARY
September 23, 2021 - January 2nd, 2022
The purpose of the Housing Element Update is to guide how the City seeks to produce new housing, preserve existing housing, ensure fair access to housing, prevent displacement of existing residents, and meet other critical housing needs over the next 8 years as required by California' s Department of Housing and Community Development. To gather feedback and reach a broader audience, an online feedback form was prepared to gather input from the Mountain View community in addition to other engagement efforts.
The online feedback form was made available on the project website www.mvhousingelement. orq) from September 23rd, 2021 through January 2nd, 2022. The survey link was shared at community events ( e. g. Monster Bash, Tree Lighting), via social media and community chat groups, published in City publications, and sent to stakeholders and interested parties who signed up for project notifications. A total of 343 responses were received in English, Russian, Spanish and Chinese. Feedback received will inform the content of future outreach efforts, and will guide the development of the Housing Element.
The following questions were included in the online feedback form.
1. What do you think are the most critical housing issues in Mountain View (select top 5)?
2. What do you think Mountain View should do to support more housing construction?
3. What do you think Mountain View should do to make housing more affordable
4. What do you think Mountain View should do to provide more housing for residents with special housing needs?
5. What do you think Mountain View should do to protect existing renters and homeowners?
6. What characteristics do you want to see in housing over the next 10 years?
7. What suggestions do you have for Mountain View to solicit additional feedback on the Housing Element Update?
8. What is one thing that you think is most important for us to consider as part of the Housing Element Update?
9. Is there anything else that you would like to add?
Below is a summary of the input received through the multiple choice questions, followed by common themes captured from the open ended "Other" option that accompanied each question see complete list of responses at www. mvhousingelement. org). Numbers in parentheses after each common theme indicates the number of responses that were accounted for.
CITY OF MOUNTAIN Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 1 Resolution No. 18781
ONLINE FEEDBACK FORM SUMMARY: MULTIPLE CHOICE
QUESTIONS 1- 5
1. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE MOST CRITICAL HOUSING ISSUES IN MOUNTAIN VIEW ( SELECT TOP 5)?
Not enough housing for low- income households
Not enough housing for middle -income households
Not enough housing for unhoused people ( e. g., emergency shelters and permanent supportive housing)
Not enough new housing development
Not enough housing near jobs, transportation, schools, and/ or grocery stores
Lack of housing for small households ( e. g., smaller homes, which might be more affordable than larger homes)
Lack of housing for families ( e. g., larger homes with 3 + bedroom)
Not enough protection for renters facing displacement due to rent increases or other factors
Not enough rental housing
Lack of senior housing
Not enough for -sale condos or townhomes
Fair housing issues / unequal access to quality housing Too much new housing development
Not enough services for unhoused people
Not enough single- family homes
Not enough down payment assistance for middle -income and low- income households
Lack of housing for people with disabilities ( e. g., homes with accessibility features)
Not enough financial assistance for lower -income homeowners that need to make home repairs
Other
s••
95 95
89 85
79 79
76 71
69 69
62 61
47 44
41 28
0 50 100 150 200 250
Common themes for open- ended response for `Other':
o Need for Complementary Infrastructure/Services to Support Housing ( 5) o Excessive Development ( 5)
o Neighborhood Preservation ( 5)
o Need for Innovation and Diversity in Housing Types (4) o Environmental Quality ( e. g. open space, trees) ( 4) CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 2 Resolution No. 18781
2. WHAT DO YOU THINK MOUNTAIN VIEW SHOULD DO TO SUPPORT MORE HOUSING CONSTRUCTION?
Rezone non- residential areas to allow housing to be built on sites that could be redeveloped from non- residential to residential uses, eg. shopping center parking lots, on top of retail or offices, and/ or on sites that could be redeveloped from non- residential to residential uses
Rezone existing residential areas to allow more homes to be built in these areas
Streamline the City process to allow homes to be approved more quickly
Reduce parking requirements or change other requirements for housing projects ( e. g., open space, parking, etc.) to reduce construction costs and allow more space for other purposes Make it easier for homeowners to build second units / accessory dwelling units
Other
109
50 100 150 200
Common themes for open- ended response for `Other':
o Limit Housing Growth ( 11)
o Allow/ Encourage Mixed Use ( 4)
o Reduce/ Remove Governmental Constraints ( 4)
o Redevelop Obsolescent Offices with Housing ( 3)
o Advocate for Regional Cooperation ( 3)
o Ensure Adequate Infrastructure to Support Housing ( 3) o City As Developer (3)
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 3 Resolution No. 18781
3. WHAT DO YOU THINK MOUNTAIN VIEW SHOULD DO TO MAKE HOUSING MORE AFFORDABLE?
Provide more funding for affordable housing projects
Increase requirements for new developments to include low- income units ( current requirement is15% affordable for most projects, 25% for rowhouses and townhouses)
Provide down payment assistance to low- income and
middle - income households
Other
111
0 5C 100 - 150 200
Common themes for open- ended response for `Other':
o Build More Housing ( 5)
o Not The City' s Role/ Do Nothing ( 5)
o Provide Incentives and Streamline Approvals ( 3)
o Focus Housing Near Transit (2)
o Improve Transit Service ( 2)
o Leverage Public Land for Affordable Housing ( 2)
o City As Developer (2)
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 4 Resolution No. 18781
4. WHAT DO YOU THINK MOUNTAIN VIEW SHOULD DO TO PROVIDE MORE HOUSING FOR RESIDENTS WITH SPECIAL HOUSING NEEDS?
Require more units to include accessibility features
Work with housing providers to create more housing for people who are homeless
Work with housing providers to create more senior housing Other
0 50 100 150
Common themes for open- ended response for `Other':
o Nothing Needs To Be Done ( 7)
o Advocate for Regional Cooperation ( 4)
o Not Familiar With Issue/ Needs ( 3)
o Provide Funding for Accessible Housing ( 3)
o Develop Accessible Housing ( 2)
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 5 Resolution No. 18781
5. WHAT DO YOU THINK MOUNTAIN VIEW SHOULD DO TO PROTECT EXISTING RENTERS AND HOMEOWNERS?
Provide housing for people Who are displaced from their homes due to demolition
Strengthen protections for mobile home park residents
Strengthen protections for renters
Provide more outreach to renters about their rights
Provide fair housing education and training
Help homeowners with home repairs and maintenance
Other
107
0 78
50 100 150
Common themes for open- ended response for `Other':
o Nothing Needs to be Done ( 11)
o Control Costs or Provide Financial or Displacement Assistance ( 5) o Preserve Neighborhoods ( 5)
o Create Local Funding Mechanism ( 3)
o Enforce Existing laws/ policies ( 3)
CITY OF MOUNTAIN Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 6 Resolution No. 18781
OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS 6- 9 - COMMON THEMES FOR
OPEN- ENDED RESPONSES
6. WHAT CHARACTERISTICS DO YOU WANT TO SEE IN HOUSING OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS?
o More Supply and Density
o Affordable Housing Across Socio- Economic Spectrum
o Small -Scale Infill/Existing Neighborhood Preservation o Transit -Oriented Development
o Diverse Housing Options ( e. g. special needs housing) o Maintain Quality of Life and Environment
o Limit Growth and Density
o Quality and Unique Design
o Evaluate Review Process/ Fees/ Regulations
7. WHAT SUGGESTIONS DO YOU HAVE FOR MOUNTAIN VIEW TO SOLICIT ADDITIONAL FEEDBACK ON THE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE?
o Comments received regarding what groups the City should outreach to:
Community Organizations/ Neighborhood Groups ( 8)
Workers/ Businesses ( 5)
Families with children ( 4)
Renters ( 4)
Low- Income/ Unhoused ( 3)
Homeowners ( 3)
o Comments received on the best methods to take feedback from the community:
Community Meetings/Workshop/ Pop- ups ( 8)
Surveys ( 5)
Go to existing meetings ( 2)
o Comments received on the best method to conduct outreach:
Direct Mailing ( 11)
Social Media// Online/ Email ( 6)
City Bills & Newsletter/City Locations (e. g. Library/Senior Center) (6) Article ( 3)
Door to Door ( flyers, solicitors) ( 2)
o Other comments regarding additional feedback suggestions:
More of it ( 2)
Provide more education resources ( 2)
8. WHAT IS ONE THING THAT YOU THINK IS MOST IMPORTANT FOR US TO CONSIDER AS PART OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE?
o Focus new housing on Affordability Across Socio-Economic Spectrum (44) o Comments about R3 Zoning Update (32)
o
Increase the quantity and density of new housing. ( 30) CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 7 Resolution No. 18781
o Focus on new low and/ or medium density housing to preserve the existing neighborhoods. ( 18)
o Promote new housing near transit centers and create walkable developments. 14)
o When adding new housing, provide additional infrastructure to support the added residents. ( 11)
o Protect the quality of life and environment of Mountain View. (11) o Develop funding programs for affordable housing. ( 8) o Provide programs that protect renters. ( 6)
o Streamline the approval process for new building and development. (6) o Ensure the safety of Mountain View residents.( 6)
o Reduce parking standards for new developments. ( 5)
o
Include adequate parking for new development. ( 3)
9. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO ADD?
o Limit the density and height of new development/ housing. ( 32) o Build more housing in general. ( 22)
o Provide more housing that is affordable for families, seniors, disabled, workers, and service providers. ( 19)
o Thank you for providing opportunities for community feedback. ( 17) o New housing should be environmentally sensitive. ( 14) o Preserve the City characteristics. ( 9)
o New housing should be able to limit the need for automobile use. ( 5) o Protect existing renters from future rent increases.(4) o Provide more outreach and education on housing opportunities and existing issues facing Mountain View residents. ( 4)
o Recreational Vehicles ( RVs) should not be allowed Citywide and should not take up parking needed for Mountain View residents. ( 3)
o Ensure that Mountain View is a safe community. (2)
o The City should work on streamlining the development process and reduce costs associated with building. ( 2)
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW Housing Element Update - Feedback Form Summary 8 Jul
am liNE
NE so NE
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
HOUSING ELEMENT
APPENDIX
G
Resolution No. 18781
City of Mountain View
Multi -Family Housing
Violation Checklist
Resolution No. 18781
APPENDIX G: CITY OF MOUNTAIN Vitt'
FAMILY HOUSING VIOLATION CHECKLIS W
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING VIOLATION CHECKLIST
This checklist is provided for your convenience and is designed to assist you in understanding inspection and code requirements. This checklist can be used by you on a regular basis to evaluate your property in regards to basic fire, electrical, plumbing, housing, and mechanical code requirements. Use of this checklist does not replace the City' s routine inspection program, but it will help you understand the types of issues the City inspector looks for during the inspection. Items marked with a shaded box are considered serious violations, versus nonserious violations marked with an unshaded box. If used proactively, correcting any serious violations prior to the inspection can reduce the annual inspection fee. This is not an exhaustive or comprehensive list but only provided as a guide.
Electrical Standards
The electrical wiring of the garbage disposal must
be properly installed. Flexible electrical cords shall
be so connected to devices and fittings so that
tension will not be transmitted to electrical joints or terminals and labeled on outlet.
Grounded electrical outlets must be properly
wired. Reverse polarity and/ or open grounds are
not allowed.
All ground - type, three - prong receptacles must be
properly grounded or provided with GFCI protection. All ground - type electrical receptacles wired to nongrounded electrical systems must be
replaced with proper two -prong, nonground
receptacles to prevent misuse and to protect users
from possible injury.
Circuit breakers or fuses must be legibly and
durably marked at the circuit box or subpanel to
indicate the circuit it protects. ( No voids shall be
left in panel.)
All electrical light switches and receptacles shall be
securely attached to the junction box and fit snugly
against the wall surface. All faceplates must be
solid, unbroken, and secured tightly to the device
yoke and flush against the wall.
To prevent possible injury to the user, pull -chain
switches for electrical fixtures must be made of
nonconductive material at any point at which the
user can make contact.
Higher -amperage fuses than design and wire
gauge are not allowed.
Flexible electrical cords and cables ( such as
extension cords, etc.) cannot be used: ( 1) as a
substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure;
2) through holes in walls, ceilings, or floors;
3) through doorways, windows, or similar openings; ( 4) where attached to building surfaces; ( 5) where concealed behind building walls, ceilings, or
floors; ( 6) where installed in raceways.
In locations where electrical equipment could be
exposed to physical damage, appropriate enclosures or guards shall be installed to prevent damage to it.
All splices and joints and the free ends of
conductors shall be covered with an insulation
equivalent to that of the conductors suitable for the
purpose and terminated in the junction box.
No electrical system, including outlets, permanently wired outlet extensions, and electrical devices, shall be installed or altered unless a
separate permit for each building or structure has
first been obtained from the Chief Building Official.
Fire Safety Standards
To maintain required fire separation protection for
dwelling units, all holes, gaps, and openings in the
ceiling and walls of the carport/ garages must be
repaired. Finished surfaces must be solid, continuous and sealed around all penetrations. Repairs must be made in the same material as the original
construction or of a material with equal fire rating.
Vegetation overgrowth must not inhibit proper use
of required exiting stairways. All encroaching
HM- 34 ( Rev. 12- 04- 13) Page 1 of 4
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix G: City of Mountain View Mulitfamily Housing Violation Checklist 381 Resolution No. 18781
vegetation must be trimmed or removed to assure
safe ingress and egress.
Every apartment complex is required to have at
least one ( 1) 2- A:10- B: C rated fire extinguisher
located within 75' travel distance of the entrance
door of each dwelling unit and 50' travel distance
of every covered parking stall. In multi -story
apartment complexes, extinguishers must be provided and mounted on every floor so that travel on stairways will not be required to reach an
extinguisher.
All fire extinguishers are required to have a
minimum 2- A:10- B: C rating. Soda acid and water
load extinguishers are inadequate to fight electrical
and oil fires and must be replaced.
Fire extinguishers are required to be serviced,
recharged, and tagged by a State licensee at least
once a year, after each use, or when pressure gauge
shows recharge needed.
Smoke alarms shall be installed and maintained in
full working order at all of the following locations:
on the ceiling or wall outside of each separate
sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of
bedrooms, in each room used for sleeping
purposes, and in each story within a dwelling unit
and in enclosed common stairwells of apartment
complexes and other multiple -dwelling complexes.
A carbon monoxide ( CO) alarm shall be installed in
all dwelling units of multi -unit occupancies having
fossil -fuel -burning appliances or attached garages.
CO devices should be installed outside each
sleeping area. The device manufacturer' s installation instructions should also be followed ( Senate Bill 183, also known as the " Carbon Monoxide
Poisoning Prevention Act").
Refuse dumpsters/ containers with an individual
capacity of 1. 5 cubic yards or greater stored or
placed within 5' of combustible walls, openings, or
eave lines, shall be protected by an automatic fire
protection ( sprinkler) system ( keep lids closed).
Windows, sliding glass doors, and all exiting
systems within a dwelling unit shall be obvious,
unobstructed, and permit exiting from the building
in the case of an emergency.
HIM-34 ( Rev. 12- 04- 13)
General Exterior Standards
The exterior surfaces of the buildings must be
maintained, including replacement of broken and
cracked windows and doors and providing paint
or other approved protective covering for weather -
exposed surfaces.
All crawl space vent openings must be covered
with a corrosion -resistant wire mesh with mesh
openings of 1/ 4" in dimension. All screens must
seal tightly to prevent infestation.
Crawlspaces shall be provided with a minimum
18" by 24" opening unobstructed by pipes, ducts,
crawl spaces, and similar construction with cover.
Leaking roofs should be repaired or replaced.
The guardrails and/ or handrails of exterior stairways and balconies must be securely attached to the deck or structure.
The swimming pool or the entire property on
which it is located shall be walled or fenced as to
prevent uncontrolled access by children from the
street or from adjacent properties. The wall or
fence shall be a minimum of 60" high with a self -
closing, self -latching device placed no lower than
54" above the ground.
All required security lighting must be maintained
operational at all times. All automatic control
devices must be periodically adjusted to assure
lighting fixtures will operate from before dusk to
after dawn.
All garbage containers are required to have tightfitting lids which must be in place at all times in order to promote sanitation and health.
Property owners shall provide a sufficient number
of standard garbage containers with close -fitting
covers for receiving and holding all garbage from
the premises without leakage or escape of odor.
Registration shall be current for all vehicles on a
property unless vehicles are completely enclosed
within a building.
Fences, walls, hedges, or street plantings shall not
exceed 3' in height within the required front yard
or street setback.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix G: City of Mountain View Mulitfamily Housing Violation Checklist 382 Resolution No. 18781
General Interior Standards
Surfaces shall be protected by appropriate
moisture -resistant wall covering or paint.
All holes, gaps, cracks, and openings in floors,
walls, and ceilings must be patched and sealed,
and all baseboards secured in place to prevent
insect infestation.
All water -damaged surfaces must be restored to
their original condition.
All missing, broken, and loose wall and/ or countertop ceramic tile must be replaced and/ or reattached to create a solid surface. All cracked
ceramic tile must be sealed to prevent water entry
to the substructure and water damage to the
structure.
All habitable rooms within a dwelling unit shall
have a minimum net glazed opening of not less
than 8 percent of the floor area of the room served.
All habitable rooms within a dwelling unit shall be
provided with natural ventilation by means of
openable exterior openings with an area of not less
than 4 percent of the floor area being ventilated.
In lieu of required exterior openings for natural
ventilation, a mechanical ventilation system may
be provided. Such mechanical ventilation system
must be maintained in full operational condition at
all times ( bathrooms).
Shower walls shall have smooth, hard, nonabsorbent surfaces such as Portland cement, concrete, ceramic tile, or other approved material to a height
of 70" above the drain inlet. All valves, faucets,
and shower assemblies provided on these walls
shall be installed and sealed in an appropriate
manner to protect structural elements from
moisture and water damage.
Water -heating equipment shall be provided with
an approved listed, adequately sized pressure relief
valve.
All water heater pressure relief valves installed on
water heaters located within a building or structure
shall be provided with full-sized drain of
galvanized steel or hard -drawn copper piping and
fittings. Such pipes shall extend from the valve to
the outside of the building, with the end of the pipe
not more than 2' nor less than 6" above ground and
pointing downward. No part of such pipe shall be
trapped, and the terminal end of the drainpipe
shall not be threaded.
An odorizing agent in natural gas has a detrimental
effect on copper gas lines, causing deterioration to
the inside of the pipe. The International Plumbing
Code requires the replacement of all copper gas
lines supplying gas -burning appliances with
approved materials.
No drainpipe for any clothes washer shall extend
more than 30" nor less than 18" above the trap.
Clothes washer drainpipe traps shall be installed
not less than 6" and not more than 18" above the
floor.
Clothes washers and similar plumbing appliances
shall not be directly connected to the building
drainage system in such a manner as to create a
back- siphonage due to suction ( air break required).
plumbing fixtures, such as
toilets, shall be rigidly secured to the drainage
connection and to the floor and caulked around the
base.
All floor -mounted
No domestic dishwashing machine shall be directly
connected to a drainage system or food waste
disposer without the use of an approved dishwasher air -gap fitting on the discharge side of the dishwashing machine.
All faucets, stop valves, drains, shower heads, and
toilet assemblies shall be drip -free and not leak.
Bathroom sink drain stop valve strainers are
required to prevent rodent and vermin migration
through the drainage system.
Gas -burning water heaters shall be securely
fastened in place by anchors or strapping to resist
horizontal displacement due to earthquake motion.
Strapping shall be at points within the upper onethird ( 1/ 3) and lower one- third ( 1/ 3) of its vertical dimensions. At the lower point, a minimum
distance of 4" shall be maintained above the
controls with the strapping ( 100- gallon- 4 straps;
75- gallon- 3 straps;
40- gallon- 2 straps).
I-IM-34 ( Rev. 12- 04- 13) Page 3 of 4
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix G: City of Mountain View Mulitfamily Housing Violation Checklist 383 Resolution No. 18781
Tub and shower enclosures, as well as sinks and
countertops, require caulking, grouting, or sealing
to prevent water leaks and damage to
substructures.
The drainage system ( including " P- traps" and trap
arms) is required to have a smooth and uniform
interior waterway with a minimum 1/ 4" per foot
slope and smooth interior surfaces for all drainage
pipes and fittings. The use of " corrugated" flexible
elbow pipes, traps, and trap arms is not permitted.
The minimum required total area of combustion air
openings in enclosures for gas -burning appliances
shall be one hundred ( 100) square inches each;
openings shall be located within the upper 12" of
the enclosure and in the lower 12".
Combustion air openings to attic spaces for gas -
burning appliances are to be provided with
galvanized sleeves of not less than 26- gauge steel
or other approved material extending from the
appliance enclosure to at least 6" above the top of
the ceiling joist. Such openings must not be
covered with screens.
Domestic clothes dryers must terminate to the
outside of the building and must be equipped with
backdraft dampers. Ducts used for domestic
clothes dryers must be of metal and shall have
smooth interior surfaces. Screws are not permitted
in ducts.
No part of the grille for wall -mounted, gas -burning
heaters shall be closer than 18" to combustible
materials; i.e., couches.
Dwelling units shall be provided with heating
facilities capable of maintaining a room temperature of 68 degrees F. at a point 3' above the floor in all habitable rooms.
Water heaters which depend on the combustion of
fuel for heat shall not be installed in a room used or
designed to be used for sleeping purposes,
bathroom, clothes closets, or in a closet or other
confined space opening into a bath or bedroom.
HM-34 ( Rev. 12- 04- 13)
Warm -air furnaces shall not be located in a room
used or designed to be used as a bedroom,
bathroom, closet, or in any enclosed space with
access only through such room or space.
Unused openings in a venting system must be
closed or capped.
Heating system and water heater flues must be
properly connected. ( Single -wall pipe connections
shall be secured with three ( 3) screws.)
The filter and filter enclosure cover for all furnaces
must be maintained in proper position.
An accessible shutoff valve must exist in the fuel -
gas piping outside of each appliance and ahead of
the union connection.
Sliding glass windows shall have both a primary
and an auxiliary locking device.
A vent connector which is part of a gravity -type
venting system shall have a continuous rise of not
less than 1/ 4" per foot of length measured from the
appliance vent collar to the vent.
A manager, janitor, housekeeper, or other responsible person shall reside on the premises and shall have charge of every apartment complex in which
there are 16 or more dwelling units.
Openable windows must have screens.
All window opening/ closing devices for casement
windows must be operable to allow window
operation.
The apartment complex shall be free of cockroach
or rat infestations.
Locks and latches for exit doors must allow
opening from the inside without the use of a key or
any special knowledge or effort. Locks, latches,
and deadbolts for exiting doors of individual
dwelling units must be mounted no higher than
48" above the floor level.
DRAFT Mountain View Housing Element I Appendix G: City of Mountain View Mulitfamily Housing Violation Checklist 384
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
HOUSING ELEMENT
i////
APPENDIX
H
Economic Analysis of
Governmental Requirements
Resolution
No.
18781
Page
447
of
483 Exhibit 1
Evaluation of Governmental Constraints for Rowhomes and Multifamily Rental Housing Mountain View Housing Element Governmental Constraints Analysis Constraint
Category
Governmental
Constraint Summary Description of Governmental Constraint Purpose of Governmental Constraint Potential Impacts on Development
Feasibility
Significance of
Constraint Based
on Cost Evaluation*
Affordable
Housing
On -site
Inclusionary
Housing
Requirements
The City' s inclusionary housing ( IH) program requires developers to provide a percentage of below market rate BMR) units on -site that are affordable to households at specified income levels. Developers can alternatively
meet this obligation via land dedication, payment of BMR in - lieu fees or other strategies if approved by the City Council.
Providing new BMR housing affordable to a
broad range of local residents and workers
helps meet RHNA goals and other important
State, regional and local policy objectives.
Reduces land values to property owners,
increases development costs, affects market
rate unit pricing, and/ or lowers
developer/ investor returns. ( If developers
cannot meet underwriting criteria or achieve
adequate returns to attract investment, then
development will not proceed.)
Major
Affordable
Housing
BMR In - Lieu
Housing Fee
The City has adopted a BMR in -lieu housing fee to help fund affordable housing in the City. The housing fee is paid by developers that are unable to fully meet the
inclusionary housing requirement on - site or via land
dedication.
if if Major
Parks
Park Land
Dedication Inlieu Fee
Park land dedication in - lieu fee is based on residential land value, which varies by residential density and
geography. In FY 21/ 22, fee ranges from $ 57, 500 to
73, 200 per market rate unit ( see Exhibit 3).
Expanding park land provides new open space
and recreational resources to residents and
students of the local school districts.
Reduces developable land area for housing and
increases development costs for market rate
housing. ( See Exhibit 3)
Moderate to Major
rowhome),
Major ( multifamily
Park Land
Dedication
Park land dedication requirement varies by residential
density with ratio of . 0060 acres of parkland per market rate unit for development of 13 du/ acre or greater.
Affordable housing is exempt from park land dedication
requirement.
if n
POPA Credit Privately owned/ publicly accessible ( POPA) open space that meets specific criteria for recreational and open
space use is eligible for a land dedication or fee credit up to seventy- five ( 75) percent of the value of the land devoted to the POPA open space.
if n
Schools School Impact
Fees
School fee is based on Statewide Level 1 fee of
4. 08/ SF, distributed to the two school districts.
Improving academic resources and school
facilities is important to maintaining quality
public education.
Increases development costs. Minimal
Schools Parcel tax All parcels in Mountain View pay a parcel tax to fund schools.
if Increases annual costs of owning or operating
housing, which reduces capacity to secure
funding to help pay for development costs.
Minimal
Schools Additional
annual
assessments or
taxes
Local school districts are considering levying additional assessments or special taxes to help fund schools.
if if Major
Seifel Consulting, Inc. 4/ 29/ 22
Resolution
No.
18781
Page
448
of
483 Exhibit 1
Evaluation of Governmental Constraints for Rowhomes and Multifamily Rental Housing Mountain View Housing Element Governmental Constraints Analysis Constraint
Category
Governmental
Constraint Summary Description of Governmental Constraint Purpose of Governmental Constraint Potential Impacts on Development
Feasibility
Significance of
Constraint Based
on Cost Evaluation*
Transportation Citywide TIF City has adopted a citywide transportation impact fee TIF) for residential development.
Enhancing multi -modal transportation networks
helps achieve circulation, Single Occupancy
Vehicle ( SOV) and climate goals.
Increases development costs. Minimal
Transportation TDM - Transit
Pass
City requires a transportation management analysis for
new development, which often includes adoption of a
transportation demand management ( TDM) program that
may include offering a free transit pass to residents.
Implementing a TDM program helps achieve
circulation, Single Occupancy Vehicle ( SOV)
and climate goals while reducing parking needs.
Increases annual costs of owning or operating
housing, which reduces capacity to secure
funding to help pay for development costs.
Minimal
Transportation TDM- Other
TDM measures
including TMA
Other TDM measures include an onsite TDM coordinator,
TDM electronic signage, shuttles, and/ or participation in a Transportation Management Association ( TMA).
if if Moderate
Community
Benefits
Provision of
community
benefits
City requires that developers provide community benefits in order to secure certain development approvals,
including increased Floor Area Ratio ( FAR).
Enhancing community amenities, such as
providing space for local organizations and
businesses, helps meet community goals.
Increases development costs and may change
the amount of land available for new housing
units, parks and community amenities.
Minimal
Development
Requirements
Increased
Parking
Requirements
Parking requirements range from 1- 2 spaces/ unit
depending on housing type and bedroom size. Guest
parking requirements range from . 15 to . 60 spaces per unit. Model parking standard requires 1 space for
studio/ one- bedroom units, 2 parking spaces for two
bedroom or larger units, with 15% of required spaces for guests.
Providing on -site parking may reduce parking
pressures on surrounding neighborhoods.
Increases amount of parking, which affects
building construction, increases development
costs and may change the amount of land
available for new housing units, parks and
community amenities, plus inhibit reaching multi -
modal transportation and climate goals.
Moderate
Development
Requirements
Design,
Building,
Infrastructure
Requirements
City requires developer to meet numerous design,
building and infrastructure requirements, which could
result in increased development costs as predevelopment progresses
Enhancing design and building standards, such
as REACH codes, helps meet planning, design
and climate goals.
Increases development costs and may change
the amount of land available for new housing
units, parks and community amenities.
Minimal
Development
Requirements
Extended
Development
Schedule
City requirements and/ or processing time frames may
increase the time it takes for developers to receive land use, design, infrastructure, permitting, plan check, and construction related approvals.
Allows additional staff review to help assure
housing meets pertinent land use, design,
infrastructure, and building standards
Increases carrying costs for land and
predevelopment expenses and/ or increases
construction costs due to extended schedule.
Moderate
Minimal - increases development costs less than 1%, Moderate - increases development costs between 1% to 5%, Major - increases development costs by 5% or more.
Source: City of Mountain View Municipal Code, FY 2021/ 22 Master Fee Schedule and Below Market Rate ( BMR) Program, California Housing and Community Development Department.
Seifel Consulting, Inc. 4/ 29/ 22
Resolution
No.
18781
Page
449
of
483
Exhibit 2
Summary Financial Evaluation of Governmental Constraints Based on Cost Impact Per Housing Unit Mountain View Housing Element Governmental Constraints Analysis Rowhome Unit 1 Multifamily Rental Unit
Constraint
Category
Governmental
Constraint
Increase in Development
Costs and Obligations Key Assumptions
Cost
Impact Per
Unit
Percent
of Dev' t
Cost
Cost
Impact Per
Unit
Percent
of Dev't
Cost
Significance of
Constraint Based
on Cost Evaluation
Affordable
Housing
On - site
Inclusionary
Housing
Requirements and
BMR In -lieu Fee
Provision of BMR units on - site
that are priced or rented for
less than development cost or
fee payment
Housing BMR in -lieu fee for
rowhome at
131. 06/ habitable SF and
multifamily rental at
100. 66/ habitable SF
196, 600 13. 9% 80, 500 9. 3% Major
Parks
Park Land
Dedication and Inlieu Fee
Park land dedication or
payment of fee per market
rate unit
See Exhibit 3— Scenario 1
57, 500
74, 400
4. 1%- 5. 3%
51, 600
73, 200
6. 0%- 8. 5%
Moderate to Major
rowhome),
Major ( multifamily)
Park Land
Dedication
Proportion of site to be
dedicated.
See Exhibit 3— Scenario 2
POPA Credit Proportion of site to be
dedicated.
See Exhibit 3— Scenario 3
Schools School Impact Fees School impact fee per unit Level 1 fee cost of
4. 08/ assessable SF
6, 120 0. 4% 4, 080 0. 5% Minimal
Schools Parcel tax Annual parcel tax payment Parcel tax of $ 191 per parcel 3, 141 0. 2% 16 0. 0% Minimal Schools Additional annual
assessments or
taxes
Potential increase in annual
costs associated with new
school funding
Projected at $ 5, 000/ year for
rowhome and $ 4, 000/ year for
multifamily
82, 200 5. 8% 65, 800 7. 6% Major
Transportation Citywide TIF Impact fee per unit TIF for rowhome at 5, 188/ unit and multifamily
rental at $ 2, 905/ unit
5, 188 0. 4% 2, 905 0. 3% Minimal
Transportation TDM - Transit Pass Annual cost of VTA transit pass ( discounted for larger
residential developments)
VTA Smart Pass at
135/ year X 2 persons for
rowhome and $ 135/ year X
1. 5 persons for multifamily
4, 400 0. 3% 3, 300 0. 4% Minimal
Transportation TDM- Other TDM
measures including
TMA
Annual contribution to TMA
and other TDM measures
TDM/ TMA contribution
estimated at
100/ month/ unit.
19, 700 1. 4% 19, 700 2. 3% Moderate
Seifel Consulting, Inc. 4/ 29/ 22
Resolution
No.
18781
Page
450
of
483
Exhibit 2
Summary Financial Evaluation of Governmental Constraints Based on Cost Impact Per Housing Unit Mountain View Housing Element Governmental Constraints Analysis Rowhome Unit 1 Multifamily Rental Unit
Constraint
Category
Governmental
Constraint
Increase in Development
Costs and Obligations Key Assumptions
Cost
Impact Per
Unit
Percent
of Dev' t
Cost
Cost
Impact Per
Unit
Percent
of Dev't
Cost
Significance of
Constraint Based
on Cost Evaluation
Community
Benefits
Community benefit
payment or
contribution
Cost of community benefits ECRPP community benefit
payment at $ 6. 60/ SF for
multifamily but may be lower
elsewhere.
0. 0% 5, 280 0. 6% Minimal
Development
Requirements
Increased Parking
Requirements
Parking increase of . 4 spaces
per unit
Estimated increase in parking
development cost based on
0. 4 spaces @
60, 000/ space.
24, 000 1. 7% 24, 000 2. 8% Moderate
Development
Requirements
Design, Building,
Infrastructure
Requirements
City design, building and/ or
infrastructure requirements
that increase development
costs
Estimated increase at 1% of
building related costs.
6, 000 0. 4% 5, 000 0. 6% Minimal
Development
Requirements
Extended
Development
Schedule
Increased development costs
due to delays in City approval.
Schedule extended by 4
months multiplied by 50% of
land and construction costs
at 10% equity carrying cost.
16, 000 1. 1% 9, 000 1. 0% Moderate
Translation of Annualized Cost to Development Cost
Loan Constant as Proxy for Annual Cost 6. 08% ( 4. 5% interest, 30 year amortization) Source: City of Mountain View Municipal Code, FY 2021/ 22 Master Fee Schedule and Below Market Rate ( BMR) Program, California Housing and Community Development Dept.
Seifel Consulting, Inc. 4/ 29/ 22
Resolution No. 18781
Exhibit 3
Evaluation of Alternative Park Land Dedication Scenarios Mountain View Housing Element Governmental Constraints Analysis R3 Zoning
Rowhome
R3 Zoning
Multifamily
R4 or ECR & SA PP
Multifamily
NBPP, EWPP
Multifamily
Assumed Density per Acre 20 du/ acre 30 du/ acre 75 du/ acre 125 du/ acre Park Land Dedication Density Category 13- 25 du/ acre 26+ du/ acre 26+ du/ acre 26+ du/ acre Park Land Dedication Requirement 0. 006 acres/ unit 0. 006 acres/ unit 0. 006 acres/ unit 0. 006 acres/ unit Scenario 1- Fee Only- Developments less than 50 units, on Small Sites and/ or Undesirable Park Locations ( Most Projects) Value per Acre ( per Master Fee Schedule)
Park Land Fee Per Market Rate Unit
9, 580, 000 per acre
57, 500 per unit
10, 450, 000 per acre
62, 700 per unit
12, 200, 000 per acre
73, 200 per unit
12, 200, 000 per acre
73, 200 per unit
Scenario 2- Park Land Dedication + Fee With Allowed Increase in Density for Multifamily ( 6 Acre Developments) Assumed Parcel Area 6 acres 6 acres 6 acres 6 acres
Potential Housing Units 120 180 450 750
Park Land Requirement
Percent of Site Required for Park
0. 50 acres
8%
0. 92 acres
15%
2. 29 acres
38%
3. 82 acres
64%
Onsite Park Land Dedication
Percent of Site Dedicated as Park
0. 40 acres
7%
0. 60 acres
10%
0. 60 acres
10%
0. 60 acres
10%
Remaining Development Potential 5. 60 acres 5. 40 acres 5. 40 acres 5. 40 acres Density ( Increased for Multifamily) 20 du/ acre 33 du/ acre 83 du/ acre 139 du/ acre Housing Units on Remaining Acreage
Percent Affordable
Affordable BMR Units
Market Rate
112 units
25%
28 units
84 units
180 units
15%
27 units
153 units
450 units
15%
68 units
382 units
750 units
15%
113 units
637 units
Remaining Park Land Requirement 0. 10 acres 0. 32 acres 1. 69 acres 3. 22 acres Total Cost of Park Land Plus Fee
Per Market Rate Unit
4, 828, 000
57, 500 per unit
3, 323, 000
21, 700 per unit
20, 642, 000
54, 000 per unit
39, 308, 000
61, 700 per unit
Potential Decrease in Units from Park Land
Dedication 8 units 0 units 0 units 0 units
Scenario 3- POPA Land Dedication + Fee With Allowed Increase in Density for Multifamily ( 6 Acre Developments) Assumed Parcel Area 6 acre 6 acre 6 acre 6 acre
Park Land Requirement 0. 51 acres 0. 92 acres 2. 29 acres 3. 82 acres POPA Dedication
Potential POPA Dedication Credit
Percent of Property as POPA
0. 6 acres
0. 45 acres
10%
0. 9 acres
0. 675 acres
15%
0. 9 acres
0. 675 acres
15%
0. 9 acres
0. 675 acres
15%
Remaining Development Potential
Deducting 50% of POPA) 5. 70 acres 5. 55 acres 5. 55 acres 5. 55 acres Density ( Increased for Multifamily) 20 du/ acre 32 du/ acre 81 du/ acre 135 du/ acre Housing Units on Remaining Acreage
Percent Affordable
Affordable BMR Units
Market Rate
114 units
25%
29 units
85 units
180 units
15%
27 units
153 units
450 units
15%
68 units
382 units
750 units
15%
113 units
637 units
Remaining Park Land Requirement 0. 06 acres 0. 24 acres 1. 62 acres 3. 15 acres Total Cost of POPA Plus Fee
Per Market Rate Unit
6, 323, 000
74,400 per unit
2, 539, 000
16, 600 per unit
19, 727, 000
51, 600 per unit
38, 393, 000
60,300 per unit
Potential Decrease in Housing Units from
POPA Dedication 6 units 0 units 0 units 0 units
Source: City of Mountain View Municipal Code and FY 2021/ 22 Master Fee Schedule.
Seifel Consulting Inc. 4/ 29/ 22
Resolution No. 18781
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
m m :: HOUSING ELEMENT
Resolution No. 18781
Exhibit E
Modifications to March 8, 2023, Draft of the City of Mountain View 6th Cycle Housing Element 2023-2031
Page numbers reference Exhibit D - March 8th Draft Housing Element 2023- 2031 Added or deleted text to the March 8th Draft presented to EPC, and includes EPC recommended edits
Gray highlighted text means added or deleted after EPC Recommendation on March 15th Chapter 1, Page 18
The sites inventory portion of the Housing Element Update also responds to input received during the public engagement process. Some specific sites were removed from the inventory in response to input from property owners and the general public that redevelopment was unlikely on those sites.
The City is undertaking a voluntary rezoning effort, not required to meet RHNA, concurrent with the Housing Element Update to increase the capacity in the sites inventory and include additional sites throughout the City, including south of El Camino Real, cvcn though the inventory can rcoaconably achieve the RHNA without these rezoning;. While there are still fewer sites south of El Camino Real compared to the remainder of the City, the site inventory identifies all sites south of El Camino Real with a reasonable likelihood of generating affordable units consistent with HCD guidance regarding likelihood and viability of redevelopment with affordable units.
Chapter 1, Page 20
The City is developing policies and ordinances intends to consider other specific actions that were requested by members of the public but that are not explicitly included in the Housing Plan chapter of this Housing Element Update. Many of these actions will require further analysis by City staff, additional public engagement, and consideration by City Council before the City can define specific future outcomes, and therefore are not included in the Housing Plan at the level of specificity that some of the public comments requested.
Chapter 3, Page 30
Goal 1: An increase in the quantity and diversity of housing options, focusing on active nodes, and walkable neighborhoods with amenities and services.
To achieve this goal, the City will acquire/ preserve existing housing units ; address, remove, or mitigate constraints to housing production;; and produce new affordable units.
Chapter 3, Page 34
1.1 Zoning Ordinance Update for Consistency with State Laws Update the Zoning Ordinance to address consistency with the following State laws and HCD guidance:
a) Add provisions for Low -Barrier Navigation Centers in compliance with AB 101( 2019)
Resolution No. 18781
b) Add provisions for Employee Housing in compliance with Health and Safety Code, § 17000 et seq)
c) Add provisions to allow mobilehome parks in all residential zones in compliance with Government Code 65852. 7
d) Amend ordinance to add definition of residential care homes and allow residential care homes as a permitted use regardless of the number of residents. e) Amend ordinance to remove unnecessary findings associated with Reasonable Accommodation permits to remove constraints to housing for special needs populations Program 2. 3)
f) Amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow emergency shelters by right consistent with AB2339. At minimum, this will include the El Camino Real Precise Plan ( consistent with the analysis provided in the sites inventory, Appendix E).
g) Ensure zoning and general plan for all sites is consistent with the Housing Element site inventory and pipeline projects. The following areas will be rezoned, even though they cover morc parcels than the site invcntory: 1
a. Leong Drive and Fairchild Drive properties at the west end of the Evandale Precise Plan ( up to at least 43 DU/ ac) - the rezoning will also identify which sites will have required neighborhood commercial
b. 1702 Miramonte, 777 Cuesta Drive, and 1949 Grant Road ( up to a least 30 DU/ ac) c. Moffett Boulevard ( up to at least 1. 85 FAR, approximately 72 DU/ ac) - the rezoning will also identify which sites will have required neighborhood commercial d. 677- 699 Calderon Ave ( up to at least 30 DU/ ac) - with required neighborhood commercial
e. Mountain View Transit Center ( up to at least 75 DU/ ac)-- in addition, the City will continue to work with and facilitate Caltrain in the development of residential on this site, possibly with other uses
Objectives and Metrics:
Update the Zoning Ordinance as needed to fully accommodate the City' s 6th Cycle RHNA.
Update the Zoning Ordinance to be consistent with recent legislation, Government Code and Health and Safety Code regulations.
Milestone and Timeframe:
Adopt zoning updates for AB 2339 by March 31, 2024
Adopt general zoning updates by December 31, 2024
Adopt zoning updates needed for any sites included in the sites inventory by December 31, 2024. If a pipeline rezoning project is not approved by this date, those units will be removed from the buffer. If there is no buffer remaining, then additional sites will be identified through the " no net loss" process.
Adopt zoning updates annually as necessary to respond to future changes in State law ongoing).
1 The rezonings cover more parcels than the sites inventory to provide additional housing opportunities, especially in high -opportunity areas.
Resolution No. 18781
Responsibility: Planning Division
Potential Funding: Development Services Fund ( DSF) and General Fund AFFH Program: Housing Mobility
Chapter 3, Page 35
1.3 Review and Update Ordinance and Precise Plan Residential Standards Review development standards to ensure they reflect contemporary building types, improve ease of implementation and improve consistency across districts. a) Ensure development projects can meet their allowed densities. Conduct a development prototype study, update definitions as necessary for consistency between plans and districts, and revise multifamily development standards in major districts (including R3) and Precise Plans to ensure projects can, at minimum, meet their allowed density and are economically feasible, where possible through reductions of physical development standards. Economic feasibility and the cumulative effects of standards will be inputs in the reduction of standards. Where appropriate, calibrate standards to lot size. Focus on standards with the greatest feasibility impacts on underutilized sites, such as open area, parking, and building coverage.
b) Compile, evaluate and refine requirements outside the Zoning Ordinance, including Heritage tree preservation and Public Works standards and requirements. c) Ensure that zoning code is updated to reflect densities and other standards as required by state law ( e. g., SB 478).
d) Adopt a TDM Ordinance that provides clear requirements for residential trip reduction across all precise plans and zoning districts and update precise plans as needed. Through the ordinance, study the cost of TDM requirements on typical residential developments, and allow residential developers to meet TDM goals through lower -cost options. Update the zoning ordinance to allow residential parking reductions for projects that implement TDM and exempt parking requirements from projects meeting enhanced TDM criteria ( Program
1.2).
e) Study live -work as an allowed residential use near retail areas, major corridors and other viable locations.
f) Identify additional Gatekeeper exemptions for residential projects based on location, size, affordability and other policy goals.
g) Hold at least one Gatekeeper meeting per year, which may be limited to residential or residential mixed -use projects only, creating greater opportunities for project -specific rezonings.
h) Conduct a review of R2 zoned properties. For all properties, upzone to either allow density greater than typical R1 properties under development similar to SB9 ( at least four units per typical parcel, plus ADUs), or integrate the sites into the R3 zone. Sites selected to integrate into the R3 zone should be based on affirmatively furthering fair housing, access to transit, schools and services and other policy goals.
Resolution No. 18781
Objectives and Metrics
Streamline the development review process by updating definitions for standards such as height, open area, common usable open area, floor area ratio, personal storage, pavement coverage and building coverage, and ensuring definitions are consistent with contemporary building types and across the Zoning Ordinance and Precise Plans.
Reduce government constraints in multifamily zoning districts ( R3, R4, CRA) and four Precise Plans ( El Camino Real, San Antonio, North Bayshore and East Whisman) by ensuring that projects can build up to their allowed density, and committing to objective, quantifiable, written development standards, conditions, and policies that will facilitate and accommodate development at the maximum density permitted on the site. by reds icing standards that have the grc\ atcst feasibility impacts on undcrutilizcd sitcs Reduce government constraints by allowing reduced parking for projects that implement TDM.
Expand small business access and opportunities by creating live -work spaces in appropriate residential areas
Increase residential zoning capacity in the R2 zone in locations that further access and fair housing goals.
Create increased opportunities for project -specific rezonings through the Gatekeeper process Milestones and Timeframe
Hold an annual Gatekeeper meeting, which may be limited or focused on residential or residential mixed - use projects at Council discretion, and begin accepting Gatekeeper applications before June 30, 2024
Conduct prototype study and evaluate standards outside the Zoning Ordinance by June 30, 2025
Update Zoning Ordinance and Precise Plans to reflect reduced standards and live -work by December 31, 2025
Adopt a Citywide TDM ordinance by December 31, 2026
Responsibility: Planning Division, Community Services Department and Public Works Department Potential Funding: Development Services Fund ( DSF)
AFFH Program: Housing Mobility, Access to Opportunity
Chapter 3, Page 38
1. 7. Monitor and Promote Accessory Dwelling Units, Junior Accessory Dwelling Units and SB9 Developments
The City will make the following
additional program enhancements to further promote them ADUs/ JADUs:
a) Develop an ADU/ JADU/ SB9 Monitoring Survey to collect data from project applicants during the building permit application process in order to enhance the existing tracking of
Resolution No. 18781
ADUs/ JADUs/ SB9 production with more details such as occupancy status and rent levels at time of occupancy.
b) Utilize the data collected from the Monitoring Survey to better understand the income groups they serve and inform future improvements to the outreach and educational efforts c) Continue to track and monitor the number and rents of ADUs/ JADUs/ SB9 Developments proposed and constructed and the progress of meeting RHNA assumptions of 30 12 units per year.
d) Participate in the Santa Clara County Collaborative' s development of an ADU Program and Resource Center which includes a countywide ADU website, plans gallery, guidebook, spotlight stories, calculator, and other tools to increase awareness and provide online assistance tools.
Objectives and Metrics:
Maintain or increase ADU/ JADU production in typically high -resource single- family neighborhoods where otherwise net new housing units may not occur and improve residential mobility and access to opportunity.
Enable the construction of at least 243 net new units through ADUs/ JADUs/ SB9 during the planning period through promotion, assistance and other tools.
Determine the obstacles affecting affordable ADU/ JADU/ SB9 production through monitoring and data collection and alleviate them as needed.
Streamline ADU and SB9 development through pre -approved design resources.
Milestone and Timeframe:
Implement ADU monitoring survey by December 31, 2024
Update City webpage with resources developed by the Collaborative by December 31, 2023.
Responsibility: Planning Division
Potential Funding: General Fund
Chapter 3, Page 39
1.8 Park Land Ordinance Update
a) Complete Phase 2 of the Park Land Dedication Ordinance update and the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan. Analysis that would support fee reductions could include:
Review of best -practices for parkland acquisition funding Pursuit of grants and other funding sources
Review of the City' s population density assumptions
Opportunities for private development to provide public open space through existing zoning requirements ( e. g., POPAs)
Development incentives and exceptions to standards for public open space
Resolution No. 18781
b) Adopt a Nexus Study that compares the City' s in -lieu fee to other cities, incorporates other sources of funding, revises valuation methodology, considers all or partial payment of fees at project occupancy, i
space, and other factors listed above for the adoption of lower residential park in -lieu fees. Prior to the adoption of these fees, reevaluate the cumulative impact of all residential fees.
This responds to input received from market -rate housing developers during the outreach process see Chapter 1: Introduction, Public Participation section).
Objectives and Metrics: Reduce constraints on residential development by reviewing and revising the park land dedication requirements to maintain access to high quality open space while reducing the financial impact to residential development. Reduce the monetary parkland in -lieu fee payment by at least 20%, on average, across a range of typical residential projects, through reduced fees as determined by the Nexus Study and/ or through other ways for developments to receive parkland credit and thereby reduce fees through relaxing regulations on the size and type of privately owned, publicly accessible ( POPA) areas and/ or allowing parkland credit for new pedestrian connections and trails.
Milestone and Timeframe:
By December 31, 2024, adopt the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan ( addressing anticipated open space needs and long-term funding strategies) By December 31, 2025, adopt the Nexus Study, reduced fees, alternate mitigations and/ or other programs to reduce costs on residential.
Responsibility: Community Services Department, Public Works Department and Planning Division Potential Funding: Park Land Dedication Fund and Shoreline Regional Park Community Fund Chapter 3, Page 47
2. 1. Subsidize and Support Affordable Housing Programs Make funding available and support programs that allow for the City to increase the number of affordable housing units for underserved populations, including:
1. Deeper affordability levels such as extremely low income ( ELI) and below
2. Supportive housing, such as rapid rehousing or permanent supportive housing ( PSH), for unhoused community members,
3. larger units to serve larger households,
4. people with special needs, including a range of disabilities, and
5. homeownership programs for lower and middle income residents.
Resolution No. 18781
Objectives and Metrics:
Make more housing available to households otherwise left out of the Mountain View housing market, such as whether the calculation of BMR prices/ rents cause a barrier to qualifying for the units because HCD income levels increase faster than the incomes of our residents who seek BMR housing.
Mitigate displacement from a range of unit types, including apartments and mobile homes, through community ccntcrcd programs, possibly including COPA/ TOPA or community land trusts.
Produce at least 200 supportive housing units for households who have experienced homelessness.
Increase the share of two and three -bedroom units in the City' s affordable housing stock.
Increase the number of ownership opportunities for middle -income households, and market those opportunities to historically excluded populations.
Increase the number of units built for special needs populations and market those units to organizations that support disabilities.
Milestone and Timeframe:
Funding opportunities will be made available ongoing via the City' s NOFA process and other programs.
Ongoing evaluation of needed units for populations with special needs, and funding opportunities through the City' s NOFA process as needed and available Staff will evaluate innovative programs over the housing element period, bringing findings to the Council as appropriate. This will include research as part of the 2022- 2024 Breakthrough Grant to identify and implement affordable housing funding programs, displacement response strategy, and outreach/ education/ community building efforts. This may include study sessions on affordable housing and displacement. Once research is complete, if directed to pursue further, develop program with 5 years.
Updatc Council on the suitability of community land trusts or COPA/ TOPA to addrem unmct Responsibility: Housing and Neighborhoods Division
Potential Funding: General Fund and local housing funds AFFH Program: Housing Mobility, Access to Opportunity, Displacement Prevention
Resolution No. 18781
Chapter 3, Page 47
2. 6 Affirmatively Further Fair Housing
Continue to prepare and update the City' s Assessment of Fair Housing and implement actions as necessary to remove barriers to fair housing choice, as required by HUD and State Housing Element law.
Objectives and Metrics:
Remove impediments to fair housing and provide equitable access to housing and opportunity.
Improve access to affordable housing in the City' s high -opportunity neighborhoods through implementation of programs 1. 3, 1. 4, 1. 5, 1. 6, 1. 7, 1. 11, 2. 2 and 4. 5.
In addition to 65 units through Program 1. 4, and 120 units ( based on half the City' s R1 properties) expected south of El Camino Real Precise Plan through Program 1. 7, the City will develop and adopt incentives and zoning to facilitate property owners south of the El Camino Real Precise Plan ( other than churches) to dedicate land to affordable housing developers or build affordable housing. The incentives and zoning will target the development, in expectation, of at least 100 additional affordable units.
Milestone and Timeframe:
Update Assessment of Fair Housing as required by HUD with the first update completed in 2023, and subsequent updates based on HUD guidance.
Implement necessary actions continuously as needed.
Develop and adopt incentives and zoning changes by December 31, 2024. If 40 units are not proposed by December 31, 2027, or if those units do not proceed, the City will conduct further outreach to determine policies that would better encourage these projects and address government constraints. The City will either adopt these policies or other policies that reduce constraints on affordable housing south of the El Camino Real Precise Plan by December 31, 2028.
Responsibility: Housing and Neighborhoods Division and Planning Division Potential Funding: CDBG/ HOME funds and Development Services Fund AFFH Program: Housing Mobility, Access to Opportunity, Place -Based Strategies, Displacement Prevention
Chapter 3, Page 48
3. 1 Homelessness Prevention and Services for the Unhoused a) Develop and implement a strategy to support those who are unhoused and prevent people from becoming unhoused
Resolution No. 18781
b) Continue to partner with the Mountain View Los Altos Community Services Agency ( CSA), LifeMoves and similar agencies that provide services and/ or shelter to the unhoused community members, such as offering financial support and advertising available programs to residents living in the City.
c) Participate in regional homeless programs that support short-term shelter and transitional housing programs that accommodate families and individuals from Mountain View. d) Allow emergency shelters pursuant to AB 2339 (see program 1. 1) Objectives and Metrics:
Prevent households from becoming homeless, for example, fewer evictions than in the past Available safety net services for those who need them ( such as shelter) - maintain at least 100 shelter or interim housing spots
A range of housing options to move households from homelessness to permanent housing, including the development of at least 200 supportive housing units Mobility out of homelessness and into permanent housing, with data showing households moving from shelter and interim housing to Mountain View -based permanent housing Milestone and Timeframe:
Develop strategy by December 31, 2024. Strategy will address critical programs to prevent and respond to homelessness including:
o Funding for rental assistance or financial assistance programs to prevent homelessness, which the City funds annually. Preferences for new housing for households who experienced or are at risk of experiencing displacement at City - subsidized housing developments or in BMR units
o Funding and incentives for the development of shelter, interim housing, and supportive housing, including via City funds and federal funds o The creation of comprehensive pathways for households to move from homelessness to City -subsidized supportive housing units
o New and expanded partnerships to address populations at risk of homelessness and continue to work with the County and to fund countywide shelters and beds for survivors of cuch aJ domestic violence victim, especially women and children.
Annually support CSA, LifeMoves and other partner agencies as part of Annual Plan.
Regularly support the development of permanent housing via regular NOFA process or through marketing City -owned sites.
See program 1. 1 for AB2339 tmeframe
Responsibility: City Manager' s Office and Housing and Neighborhoods Division Potential Funding: Local housing funds and CDBG/ HOME funds AFFH Program: Displacement Prevention
Resolution No. 18781
Chapter 3, Page 49
3. 2 Displacement Prevention and Mitigation
Prevent/ mitigate displacement of households, including those in mobile homes, and prevent the loss of naturally occurring affordable units. Conserve and improve existing affordable housing stock.
Objectives and Metrics:
Prevent displacement through rent stabilization;; deed restriction,; and housing preservation work; community ownership models to acquire/ preserve at least 50 housing units that would remain affordable ( e. g., around 30% of household income);; and/ or Opportunity to Purchase Act ( OPA) Programs;. These measures should include a range of units, such as apartments, mobile homes, and different unit sizes. Eviction levels should not increase or preferably should be lowered.
Replace all rent -stabilized units through SB 330 and enforce right of first refusal. Develop local replacement requirements to replace demolished rent -stabilized units - details to be determined pending Council evaluation of replacement requirement options, where legally feasible
Assist all displaced eligible tenants in receiving SB 330/ Tenant Relocation Assistance to partially mitigate displacement impacts. Evaluate the efficacy of TRAO in meeting anti - displacement goals, such as being able to stay in Mountain View Apply for outside funding sources ( Programs 4. 2, 4. 3, and 4. 4) and develop funding partnerships to invest at least $ 10 million to support the preservation/ acquisition of naturally affordable units via the community ownership model.
Create a community ownership action plan for a community ownership model/ structure that, with community partners, could address housing needs that aren' t met through traditional affordable housing and that could take part in preservation and acquisition activities. The action plan will identify the City' s and other organizations' responsibilities, establish a schedule such that acquisition could occur within two years, depending on the timing of funding opportunities and the fulfillment of other organizations' responsibilities.
Assist tenants in understanding their housing rights via the Housing and Eviction Help Center Program 2. 5).
Inform property owners of their responsibilities related to just cause evictions and habitability under the CSFRA, MHRSO, and relevant state laws, via regular webinars ( Programs 1. 12 and
2. 5)
Maintain habitability of naturally occurring affordable housing via regular code enforcement through the multi -family housing inspection program.( Program 1. 12) Provide benefits and relocation assistance to displaced residents to partially mitigate impacts of displacement, with the goal of having a comprehensive strategy to prevent displacement before the expiration of SB 330. Strategies may include:
o Temporary relocation
o Realistic options for exercising right of first refusal o Pathways to affordable housing
Resolution No. 18781
o Preservation of " naturally affordable" housing
o Connections to owners of developments with vacant " naturally affordable" units Study amendments to the Mobile Home Rent Stabilization Ordinance ( MHRSO) such that reduce annual allowable allowed rent increases are consistent with or less than comparable jurisdictions with rent control for mobile home parks.
Assist in preserving at least two naturally occurring affordable housing projects during the planning period, and aim to preserve more, to both preserve units and create a viable space for displaced residents to move. Provide support to community groups on potential acquisition/ preservation opportunities.
Milestone and Timeframe:
Continuously enforce the Tenant Relocation Assistance Ordinance, Community Stabilization and Fair Rent Act ( CSFRA), Mobile Home Rent Stabilization Ordinance ( MHRSO), Condominium Conversion Ordinance ( CCO), and relevant state tenant protection laws Create community ownership action plan by June 30 December 31, 2025.
Study updates to MHRSO regarding allowed rent increases and adopt ( if directed by Council) by March December 31, 2025.
Evaluate the efficacy of TRAO by December 31, 2024. Continuously monitor conditions to identify need for updates to TRAO, including potential necescary increases in a&cistance.
Develop funding strategy for affordable housing preservation by December 31, 2025.
As part of the Displacement Response Strategy project, propose anti -displacement strategies to Council in 2023, including local replacement requirements and community ownership models and Opportunity to Purchase Act ( OPA) Programs. Develop comprehensive potential alternatives to displacement," via first right of refusal requirements, displaced - resident preferences, partnerships with developers on alternative units for displaced residents, and plans for unit preservation by 2028.
Target expenditure of funds to assist in preserving at least two naturally occurring affordable housing projects during the planning period.
Responsibility: Housing and Neighborhoods and Planning Divisions Potential Funding: Local housing funds and CDBG/ HOME funds AFFH Program: Place - Based Strategies, Displacement Prevention Chapter 3, Page 59
Schedule
Date Program/ Task Responsibility
Short- term 4. 1: Compliance with new transparency
requirements for posting all zoning,
development standards and fees on the
City' s website
Building
4. 8: Share a copy of the updated Housing
Element to school districts
Planning
4.9: Share a copy of the updated Housing
Element to water/ sewer utility staff
Planning
Resolution No. 18781
December 2023 1. 7 Update City webpage with ADU
resources developed by the Santa Clara
County Collaborative
Planning
1. 9: Complete first review BMR Phase 2
program
Housing
2. 6: Update Assessment of Fair Housing Housing
3. 2 Propose anti displacement response Housing
strategies to Council
4. 7: Compile and maintain contact list for Housing and community engagement Planning
March 2024 - 1.1 Zoning Ordinance Update for AB 2339 Planning June 2024 1. 3 Establishing Gatekeeper schedule and
begin accepting Gatekeeper applications
2. 3: Produce and distribute Reasonable
Accommodation information materials
Planning
Planning
4. 1: Review and update NOFA process Housing, Planning
4. 1: Implement electronic review software Building, Planning December 2024 - Various Zoning Ordinance Updates:
O 1. 1: Zoning Ordinance Update for
Consistency with State Laws
O 1. 2: Eliminate minimum Parking
Standards for Residential in Transit -
Oriented Areas, Affordable Housing
Developments, and Other Cases
O 1. 4: Religious and Community Assembly
Sites for Housing
1. 7: Implement ADU monitoring survey
Planning
Planning
1. 8 Adoption of Parks and Recreation
Strategic Plan
Community
Services
1. 12: Outreach to tenant and landlords
about tenants' rights under CSFRA
Housing
2. 1: Updatc Council on innovativc affordablc Housing
housing programs, including acrescmcnt of
CLTs, COPA/ TOPA
2. 6: Develop and adopt incentives and
zoning changes ( AFFH)
Planning
3. 1: Develop Homelessness Prevention and Housing and City Services for the Unhoused strategy Manager' s Office
3. 2: Evaluate the efficacy of TRAO by Housing
December 31, 2024.
4. 1 Implement the following 2021 Matrix IT, Finance,
Study Recommendations: Housing, Building,
o
Implement online permitting system and Planning
ProjectDox)
o Streamline City' s contract process
for consultant services
Resolution No. 18781
March 2025
June 2025
o Establish and publish formal
planning application review
timelines
o Standardize development permit -
related comment letters
o Create a dashboard for
implementation of Matrix Study
recommendations
o Conduct a Development Services
Fund Fee Study and update the
Master Fee Schedule
4. 2 Participate in planning process for a City Manager' s 2024 regional housing funding measure Office
3. 2 Update the MHRSO Housing
1. 3: Conduct prototype study for residential Planning
standards
1. 5: Inform property owners about non- Planning
conforming density updates to Zoning
Ordinance
3. 2 Develop community ownership action Housing
plan
1.1: Rezoning sites to be included in Sites Planning
December 2025 Inventory
Various Zoning Ordinance Updates:
O 1. 3: Review and Update Ordinance
and Precise Plan Residential
StandardsO 1. 5: Non -conforming R1 and R2
Multifamily Developments
1. 8 Adopt reduced fees, alternate
mitigations and/ or other programs to
reduce costs on residential development
2. 2: Perform needs assessment for Pilot
ADU & SB9 Financial Incentives Program
Planning
Planning
Housing
3. 2 Develop funding strategy for affordable
housing preservation
4. 1 Implement the following 2021 Matrix
Study Recommendations:
o Expand GIS system for the public
o Create dashboard with historic and
current performance indicators for
development review process ( IT,
Housing, Building, and Planning)
4. 3 Complete evaluation of new funding
sources
Housing
Housing
4.4: Secure funding to support identified
near -term pipeline projects
Housing
4. 6: Meet with major employers to partner
on workforce housing
Planning
Resolution No. 18781
December 2026 - 2. 2: Develop pilot ADU & SB9 grant program Housing informed by needs assessment
Various Zoning Ordinance Updates
Planning, unless specified below):
O 1. 2 and 1.3: TDM Ordinance ( Public
Works)
O 1. 6: SB9 DUO Subdivisions ( Public
Works)
O 4. 1: Review Zoning Ordinance
processes and approval bodies
Planning, unless
specified
December 2027 - 3. 2 Study updates to MHRSO
1. 4 Conduct outreach and adopt additional
policies for affordable housing south of ECR
Housing
4. 5 Identify the remaining Downtown Planning and
affordable units needed and/ or issue RFP Public Works
December 2028 - 1. 9: Complete second review BMR Phase 2 Housing program, including:
O 2. 4: Evaluate effectiveness of efforts
to increase equitable access to
housing.
O 2. 5: Perform self -evaluation on fair
housing practices.
2. 2: Assess pilot ADU & SB9 grant program
for continuation
Housing
2. 6: Develop and adopt additional
incentives and zoning changes if metrics
aren' t met ( AFFH)
Planning
3. 2 Develop comprehensive " alternatives to
displacement" strategy
4. 4 Secure additional funding to meet City' s
anti -displacement goals
Housing
Housing
December 2029 - 2. 1: Develop program for innovative housing Housing solutions based on research and findings
Resolution No. 18781
Exhibit F
Modifications to March 8, 2023 Housing Element as Modified by Exhibit E Page numbers reference Exhibit D - March 8th Draft Housing Element 2023- 2031 Recommended added or dcictcd text to the March 8th Draft as modified by Exhibit E Chapter 3, Page 34
1. 1 Zoning Ordinance Update for Consistency with State Laws Update the Zoning Ordinance to address consistency with the following State laws and HCD guidance:
a) Add provisions for Low -Barrier Navigation Centers in compliance with AB 101 (2019) b) Add provisions for Employee Housing in compliance with Health and Safety Code, § 17000 et seq)
c) Add provisions to allow mobilehome parks in all residential zones in compliance with Government Code 65852. 7
d) Amend ordinance to add definition of residential care homes and allow residential care homes as a permitted use regardless of the number of residents. e) Amend ordinance to remove unnecessary findings associated with Reasonable Accommodation permits to remove constraints to housing for special needs populations Program 2. 3)
f) Amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow emergency shelters by right consistent with AB2339. At minimum, this will include the El Camino Real Precise Plan ( consistent with the analysis provided in the sites inventory, Appendix E). In addition, identify at least one additional site consistent with the AB2339 methodology and the non -vacant sites analysis in Appendix E, and amend the subject Zoning District or Precise Plan as necessary. g) Ensure zoning and general plan for all sites is consistent with the Housing Element site inventory and pipeline projects. The following areas will be rezoned: 1 a. Leong Drive and Fairchild Drive properties at the west end of the Evandale Precise Plan ( up to at least 43 DU/ ac) - the rezoning will also identify which sites will have required neighborhood commercial
b. 1702 Miramonte, 777 Cuesta Drive, and 1949 Grant Road ( up to a least 30 DU/ ac) c. Moffett Boulevard ( up to at least 1.85 FAR, approximately 72 DU/ ac) - the rezoning will also identify which sites will have required neighborhood commercial d. 677- 699 Calderon Ave ( up to at least 30 DU/ ac) - with required neighborhood commercial
e. Mountain View Transit Center ( up to at least 75 DU/ ac)-- in addition, the City will continue to work with and facilitate Caltrain in the development of residential on this site, possibly with other uses
1 The rezonings cover more parcels than the sites inventory to provide additional housing opportunities, especially in high -opportunity areas.
Resolution No. 18781
Objectives and Metrics:
Update the Zoning Ordinance as needed to fully accommodate the City' s 6th Cycle RHNA.
Update the Zoning Ordinance to be consistent with recent legislation, Government Code and Health and Safety Code regulations.
Milestone and Timeframe:
Adopt zoning updates for AB 2339 by March 31, 2024
Adopt general zoning updates by December 31, 2024
Adopt zoning updates needed for any sites included in the sites inventory by December 31, 2024. If a pipeline rezoning project is not approved by this date, those units will be removed from the buffer. If there is no buffer remaining, then additional sites will be identified through the " no net loss" process.
Adopt zoning updates annually as necessary to respond to future changes in State law ongoing).
Responsibility: Planning Division
Potential Funding: Development Services Fund ( DSF) and General Fund AFFH Program: Housing Mobility
Chapter 3, Page 38
1.7 Monitor and Promote Accessory Dwelling Units, Junior Accessory Dwelling Units and SB9 Developments
The City will make the following additional program enhancements to further promote ADUs/ JADUs:
a) Develop an ADU/ JADU/ SB9 Monitoring Survey to collect data from project applicants during the building permit application process in order to enhance the existing tracking of ADUs/ JADUs/ SB9 production with more details such as occupancy status and rent levels at time of occupancy.
b) Utilize the data collected from the Monitoring Survey to better understand the income groups they serve and inform future improvements to the outreach and educational efforts c) Continue to track and monitor the number and rents of ADUs/ JADUs/ SB9 Developments proposed and constructed and the progress of meeting RHNA assumptions of 30 units per year.
d) Participate in the Santa Clara County Collaborative' s development of an ADU Program and Resource Center which includes a countywide ADU website, plans gallery, guidebook, spotlight stories, calculator, and other tools to increase awareness, and provide online accictancc tool ;. Provide staff assistance and user-friendly tools for the public for ADUs and SB9 projects.
Resolution No. 18781
Objectives and Metrics:
Maintain or increase ADU/ JADU production in typically high -resource single- family neighborhoods where otherwise net new housing units may not occur and improve residential mobility and access to opportunity.
Enable the construction of at least 243 net new units through ADUs/ JADUs/ SB9 during the planning period through promotion, assistance and other tools.
Determine the obstacles affecting affordable ADU/ JADU/ SB9 production through monitoring and data collection and alleviate them as needed
Streamline ADU and SB9 development through pre -approved design resources Milestone and Timeframe:
Implement ADU monitoring survey by December 31, 2024
Update City webpage with resources developed by the Collaborative by December 31, 2023.
Responsibility: Planning Division
Potential Funding: General Fund
Chapter 3, Page 39
1.8 Park Land Ordinance Update
a) Complete Phase 2 of the Park Land Dedication Ordinance update and the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan. Analysis that would support fee reductions could include:
Review of best -practices for parkland acquisition funding Pursuit of grants and other funding sources
Review of the City' s population density assumptions
Opportunities for private development to provide public open space through existing zoning requirements ( e. g., POPAs)
Development incentives and exceptions to standards for public open space b) Adopt a Nexus Study that compares the City' s in -lieu fee to other cities, incorporates other sources of funding, revises valuation methodology, considers' establishes criteria for all or partial payment of fees at project occupancy, and other factors for the adoption of lower residential park in -lieu fees. Prior to the adoption of these fees, reevaluate the cumulative impact of all residential fees.
This responds to input received from market -rate housing developers during the outreach process see Chapter 1: Introduction, Public Participation section).
Objectives and Metrics: Reduce constraints on residential development by reviewing and revising the park land dedication requirements to maintain access to high quality open space while reducing the financial impact to residential development. Reduce the monetary parkland in -lieu fee payment by Resolution No. 18781
at least 20%, on average, across a range of typical residential projects, through reduced fees as determined by the Nexus Study and/ or through other ways for developments to receive parkland credit and thereby reduce fees through relaxing regulations on the size and type of privately owned, publicly accessible ( POPA) areas and/ or allowing parkland credit for new pedestrian connections and trails.
Milestone and Timeframe:
By December 31, 2024, adopt the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan ( addressing anticipated open space needs and long-term funding strategies) By December 31, 2025, adopt the Nexus Study, reduced fees, alternate mitigations and/ or other programs to reduce costs on residential.
Responsibility: Community Services Department, Public Works Department and Planning Division Potential Funding: Park Land Dedication Fund and Shoreline Regional Park Community Fund Chapter 3, Page 50
4. 1 Development Streamlining and Processing Revisions
Implement processing procedures and technology improvements that will reduce Planning and Building Permit review timelines to address constraints resulting from the duration of staff review. a) Review and update the City' s affordable Housing NOFA process to improve coordination and communication internally ( e. g., coordination between Housing, Planning and other departments and internal processes in Planning and other departments) and with applicants. Encourage affordable housing developers to work with outside funding sources to leverage the City' s local funds to the maximum extent possible. Initial steps in the review include additional developer roundtables, garnering consultant advice, and reviewing other public agency best practices. In addition, the City will continue to facilitate and support 100% affordable housing development in the review process, by allocating dcdicatcd utilizing trained staff in each Department and Division involved in the development review and building permit processes, and by utilizing streamlining opportunities. The staff members will be trained in processes, requirements, timelines, and financing specific to affordable housing projects. This responds to input received from affordable housing developers during the outreach process ( see Chapter 1:
Introduction, Public Participation section).
b) Review development and post -development processes, timelines, and approval body levels to streamline permitting processes. Adopt procedures that improve internal coordination and staff throughput. This responds to input received from market -rate housing developers during the outreach process ( see Chapter 1: Introduction, Public Participation section).
c) Continue to implement the 2021 Development Review Assessment (" Matrix Study"), building off of completed recommendations ( such as revisions to Project Coordinating Committee process, updated application forms, application inactivity policy, and creation of Permit Navigator position).
d) Acquire additional tools and software that will improve development review, monitoring of housing supply, management of funding, transparency of data and approvals, and other processes involved in housing development for staff and public use.
Resolution No. 18781
In addition, Program 1. 3 will streamline development review by improving the consistency, transparency and relevance of the standards that affect residential development.
Objectives and Metrics:
Facilitate at least 1, 100 units of 100% affordable development by streamlining the funding approval process, prioritizing staff review, utilizing State streamlining ( e. g., SB35).
Reduce the number of resubmittals and time between application completeness and approval through process and approval body revisions.
Identify thresholds for multifamily projects that can be eligible for ministerial approvals.
Reduce the number of compliant projects in Precise Plans that require Council hearings.
Bring the city fully into compliance with new transparency legislation by posting project - specific fees online.
Improve the development review process through implementation of the 2021 Matrix Study.
Milestone and Timeframe:
Bring City into full compliance with transparency requirements as soon as possible.
Review and update NOFA process by June 30, 2024.
Update the Zoning Ordinance process and approval bodies by December 31, 2026 Implement the following 2021 Matrix Study recommendations:
o
Implement an online permitting system for Building, Planning and Public Works ProjectDox) by December 31, 2024
o Streamline the City' s contract process for consultant services related to development review by December 31, 2024
o Establish and publish formal planning application review timelines and track performance by December 31, 2024
o Standardize development permit -related comment letters to refer to adopted codes, design standards and include checkboxes for staff/ applicant by December 31, 2024 o Expand the City' s GIS system for the public on City' s website by December 31, 2025 o Create a dashboard with historic and current performance indicators for the development review process by December 31, 2025
o Create a dashboard for the implementation of the Matrix Study recommendations by December 31, 2024
o Conduct a Development Services Fund Fee Study and update the Master Fee Schedule based on results by December 31, 2024
Acquire additional software and tools as identified.
Responsibility: IT Department, Finance Department, Housing, Building and Planning Divisions Potential Funding: General Fund, Development Services Fund and local housing funds AFFH Program: Housing Mobility, Access to Opportunity
Appendix E, Page 311
Site -Specific Information
Beyond market conditions and development trends, other site -specific conditions found in select sites, as outlined below, make them viable for inclusion in the inventory and provide evidence that Resolution No. 18781
discontinuation of the existing use during the 6th cycle is probable. These factors include dilapidated building and site conditions, development agreements, landowners expressing development interest, and expiring lease data. While existing leases or other contracts in non -vacant sites have been considered, it is important to note that leases and contracts related to privately owned properties are not public information, and the City does not have any power to require or compel property owners to provide this information. However, through public listings the City has identified that nearly one fifth of the non -vacant sites in the inventory have some level of tenant or site vacancy.
In addition to the information below, Appendix I includes more information about inventory sites that were challenged through public comment.
Appendix E, Page 410
Sites for Emergency Shelters
Pursuant to AB2339 ( Government Code Section 65583( a)( 4) and ( 7)), the City must identify sites and zoning districts for emergency shelters.
The land area need for emergency shelter sites is based on the latest point -in -time count ( published in the 2022 Santa Clara County Point -in -Time Report on Homelessness, from Applied Survey Research and the County of Santa Clara), any pipeline funded rapid rehousing and permanent supportive housing units in the City, and a ratio determined by State law. These are summarized in Table 70 below. It should be noted that this is a conservative estimate since the units in Table 70 may be expected to house more than one person.
Table 70: Need for Emergency Shelters
2022 Point -In -Time Count ( Unsheltered)
Pipeline Rapid Rehousing and Permanent Supportive Housing See Table 71)
Remaining Need
206
174
32 Land Area Needed ( based on 200 sq. ft per person) 6, 400 sq. ft.
Table 71: Pipeline Rapid Rehousing and Permanent Supportive Housing Project
Crestview ( 901 E. El Camino Real)
Lot 12
1265 Montecito Avenue
Units
20 20
41 1100 La Avenida 30
1020 Terra Bella Avenue 27
1012 Linda Vista Avenue
96 W. El Camino Real
Total Units
16 20
174
Resolution No. 18781
The following site can accommodate an emergency shelter and is greater than 6, 400 square feet. 860 Bay Street, APN 158-01-039
This is a vacant 10, 900 square foot site in the El Camino Real Precise Plan. It has excellent access to transit, since it is 550 feet walking distance from a VTA route 22 stop (the most frequent service in Santa Clara County) with service to Downtown Mountain View and other major commercial and job centers throughout the South Bay and Peninsula. It is less than a 1,500 foot walk to two major shopping centers with groceries ( Nob Hill, 99 Ranch, Nijiya), a pharmacy ( Walgreens), and myriad other goods and services. It is less than a mile to El Camino Hospital, a major facility with emergency services and Palo Alto Medical Foundation, another major medical facility. Mental health services are provided at the Community Health Awareness Council, less than a half mile away.
Shortly before adoption of this document, an application to develop this site with housing units was submitted. If this project proceeds, the site will be unavailable for an emergency shelter. To support continued compliance with the intent of AB 2339, the City will identify one or more additional sites of at least 6, 400 square feet that meet the non -vacant sites analysis characteristics identified for housing sites earlier in this appendix.
Program 1. 1 will rezone amend the El Camino Real Precise Plan consistent with AB 2339, allowing emergency shelters without a conditional use permit and identifying objective standards. In addition, the Program directs the City to identify one or more additional sites and to amend the Zoning Ordinance or Precise Plan as necessary.
Appendix I ( New, Added)
See following pages.
Resolution
No.
18781
Page
474
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FB I be City Response
1350 Pear Ave It is not vacant; there are tenants
there, and as of February 2023,
the building continues to be
offered for commercial leases
This property is comprised of a single -story, multi -tenant light industrial building that was constructed in 1987, with a current FAR of 0. 332, well below the development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or are in the residential pipeline had tenants and/ or were offered for lease prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). The available office space in the property is listed with an asking rent of $ 27 per square foot per year.
According to the data available from Costar, this is lower than the per - square -foot asking rent for all multifamily rental properties that have been constructed in Mountain View in the past 20 years, including for 100 percent affordable properties. The higher rental rate for residential uses and the additional development potential for the site make this site an attractive development opportunity. In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs. City staff have reached out to the property manager for this site in writing and by phone but have not yet received a response.
885 Maude Ave this site' s capacity should be 885 Maude is comprised of two sites, including APN 16059006, with a adjusted so that it matches the total area of 1. 8 acres. Further, the City has conducted prototype and realistic density of other sites with economic analyses on these land dedication sites to guarantee that the the same zoning. The site is
currently zoned as East Whisman
number of units can be built.
Medium Intensity" 7; based on
Table 46 at p. 300 of the draft, it
thus has a " realistic density" of 79
du/ ac.; Because it is only 1.03
acres, it should therefore be
shown on the site inventory as 81
units ( i. e., 1. 03 times 79 du/ ac).
1 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
475
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FBM Letter City Response
1250 Space Park
Way
question as to either the timing or
the realistic capacity under the
existing zoning; At page 323 of
the March 6, 2023 draft Housing
Element, it explains that the
timeline of Phase 2 in the North
Bayshore Precise Plan is many
years away: " land dedication" is
tentatively by 2029," with
construction starting "within two
years from land dedication."
The timing for the North Bayshore Precise plan that is presented in the draft HEU is a worst -case scenario. It is more likely that the units will be constructed before 2031. The City can take a number of steps to facilitate the development of the site for affordable housing prior to land dedication, including issuing an RFP for an affordable housing developer to develop the site. Program 4. 5 in the draft HEU obligates the City to act on these sites to develop 100 percent affordable housing as soon as the sites are dedicated to the City.
1345 Shorebird
Way
question as to either the timing or
the realistic capacity under the
existing zoning; At page 323 of
the March 6, 2023 draft Housing
Element, it explains that the
timeline of Phase 2 in the North
Bayshore Precise Plan is many
years away: " land dedication" is
tentatively by 2029," with
construction starting " within two
years from land dedication."
See notes for 1250 Space Park Way
1375 Shorebird
Way
question as to either the timing or
the realistic capacity under the
existing zoning; At page 323 of
the March 6, 2023 draft Housing
Element, it explains that the
timeline of Phase 2 in the North
Bayshore Precise Plan is many
years away: " land dedication" is
tentatively by 2029," with
construction starting " within two
years from land dedication."
See notes for 1250 Space Park Way
2 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
476
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FB I be City Response
608 San Antonio
Road
has a bank ( Citibank), an art
school ( Cal Color Academy) at 612
San Antonio, a religious
organization at 616 San Antonio;
a space that appears to be
available for lease at 620 San
Antonio
This property is comprised of a single -story retail building that was constructed in 1970, with a current FAR of 0. 222, well below the development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or are in the residential pipeline had commercial businesses operating on the site prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs.
1070 La Avenida U. S. Postal Service Carrier Annex; This property is comprised of a single -story building that was constructed The block itself is unlikely to be in 1980, with a current FAR of 0. 334, well below the development redeveloped as housing; the potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site Analysis and Postal Service annex is across the Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these characteristics street from Microsoft' s Silicon make this site similar to sites that have recently redeveloped with Valley headquarters, and one door residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s residential down from an additional Microsoft pipeline. The site' s location near Microsoft facilities does not preclude the research facility use of the site for residential uses; residential properties new other major employers in Mountain View have been redeveloped as housing. In fact, a property that is three properties away from 1070 La Avenida is under development as a 100% affordable housing development. In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs. 3 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
477
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
401 E Middlefield At 401 E. Middlefield Road ( APN This property is comprised of a single -story light industrial building that Rd 160- 52- 021), on the same block was constructed in 1997, with a current FAR of 0. 35, well below the and currently occupied by development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site Mobilelron, a technology company Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these whose headquarters are across characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently the street, the site inventory redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s indicates that an earlier residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or application " for residential are in the residential pipeline had businesses operating on the site prior development on this site [ was] to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential withdrawn due to historic projects ( see Table 50). In addition, the City has several years during the significance of adjacent site." If 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property the owner has decided, after due owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and deliberation, not to proceed with
development for this reason, then
other programs.
it would seem to preclude listing The earlier development application for this included both 401 E the site, because it is not realistic Middlefield site and 355 East Middlefield site. 355 East Middlefield is the to expect it to redevelop; We do site that was identified as having historic significance, and is not included note that the prior proposal had in the site inventory. The historic significance of 355 East Middlefield far fewer affordable units: just 27 would have no bearing on the development potential for 401 E Middlefield lower income units and 41
moderate on a project
encompassing 6 acres
if a developer wanted to develop just the 401 E Middlefield site. 1280 Space Park Pickering Laboratories, which This property is comprised of a two- story industrial building that was Way makes high technology constructed in 1959, with a current FAR of 0. 42, well below the instruments and chemical development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site reagents for environmental,
pharmaceutical, and biochemical
Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently laboratories. Pickering owns the redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s building, and is headquartered residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or here. are in the residential pipeline had businesses operating on the site prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs.
4 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
478
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FB I be City Response
325 E Middlefield is the worldwide headquarters of This property is comprised of a single -story light industrial building that Road IGM Biosciences; it also has a was constructed in 1966, with a current FAR of 0. 373, well below the relatively new lease for a facility at development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site 875 Maude; IGM Biosciences is Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these not a short-term tenant at all: characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently publicly available information redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s shows that it signed a lease in residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or 2021 that lasts until 2032. are in the residential pipeline had businesses operating on the site prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). The lease information that is provided in the comment letter should not be assumed to override the characteristics that make this site a realistic site for residential development during the planning period, as discussed during the call that Reid and Stephanie had on March 29. In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs. To provide a conservative analysis, this site was removed from the inventory due to the date of the lease expiration. 5 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
479
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FBM Letter City Response
335 E Middlefield is a research facility for Volvo' s This property is comprised of a single -story light industrial building that Road autonomous driving technology was constructed in 1982, with a current FAR of 0. 357, well below the group; The property is currently development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site leased to Volvo long-term under a Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these ten year lease running until characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently sometime in 2026; it is unclear redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s whether Volvo has options to residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or extend the lease. are in the residential pipeline had businesses operating on the site prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). The lease information that is provided in the comment letter should not be assumed to override the characteristics that make this site a realistic site for residential development during the planning period. Moreover, the lease expiration date that is cited in the comment letter is relatively early in the planning period, leaving time to develop the site after the lease expires. In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs.
345 E Middlefield is the worldwide headquarters of See notes for 325 E Middlefield. It should be noted that information from Road IGM Biosciences; it also has a Compstak indicates that the lease for this site expires in 2023, leaving relatively new lease for a facility at plenty of time to develop the site after the lease expires. 875 Maude
6 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
480
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
450 E Middlefield is the headquarters of Coros, Inc., This property is comprised of a single -story light industrial building that Road a technology company for supply was constructed in 1966, with a current FAR of 0. 307, well below the chain issues founded in 2019; In development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site 2021, it signed a seven year Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these sublease for 448- 450 East characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently Middlefield, with an initial redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s expiration date of 2028 residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or are in the residential pipeline had businesses operating on the site prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). The lease information that is provided in the comment letter should not be assumed to override the characteristics that make this site a realistic site for residential development during the planning period. Moreover, the lease expiration date that is cited in the comment letter is within the planning period, leaving time for development after the lease expires. In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs. To provide a conservative analysis, this site was removed from the inventory due to the date of the lease expiration.
1500 Shoreline the City has not adequately This property owner has expressed interest in redeveloping the site with Blvd demonstrated that a site this large residential uses, and has recently submitted an application that includes can be developed as lower 440 lower income units. The site inventory conservatively assumes that income housing ( an affordable the site will accommodate 1,000 units, including market -rate units, during housing developer could not take the 6th Housing Element Cycle, though it could yield at least 1, 732 units. on a project this large), and the The inventory assumes that 100 of these units would be lower -income City fails to show that " sites of units, which would be required as part of a residential development on the equivalent size were successfully site due to the City' s inclusionary requirements. This information is developed during the prior provided in the Housing Sites Analysis and Inventory chapter to planning period for an equivalent demonstrate that the site inventory provides a conservative estimate of number of lower income housing
units as projected for the site ..."
the lower -income capacity for this site.
7 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
481
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FB `° e`"`er City Response
855 Maude Ave HackerDojo ( an open working This property is comprised of a single -story light industrial building that space for software projects,
founded in 2009), has a lease
was constructed in 1966, with a current FAR of 0. 369, well below the development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site that currently runs until 2026. Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or are in the residential pipeline had businesses operating on the site prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). The lease information that is provided in the comment letter cannot be verified and should not be assumed to override the characteristics that make this site a realistic site for residential development during the planning period. Moreover, the lease expiration date that is cited in the comment letter is relatively early in the planning period, leaving time to develop the site after the lease expires. In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs. 8 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
482
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FB I be City Response
875 Maude Ave is the worldwide headquarters of
IGM Biosciences; it also has a
relatively new lease for a facility at
875 Maude
This property is comprised of a single -story light industrial building that was constructed in 1963, with a current FAR of 0. 39, well below the development potential for the site. As discussed in the Housing Site Analysis and Inventory appendix of the Housing Element Update, these characteristics make this site similar to sites that have recently redeveloped with residential uses and sites that are currently in the City' s residential pipeline. Many of the sites that have recently redeveloped or are in the residential pipeline had businesses operating on the site prior to redevelopment, and nonetheless have since been slated for residential projects ( see Table 50). Information from Compstak indicates that the lease for this site expires in 2023, leaving plenty of time to develop the site after the lease expires. A leasing flyer advertising a space within the existing building in December 2021 listed an asking rent of $2. 50 per square foot per month. According to the data available from Costar, this is lower than the per -square -foot asking rent for all multifamily rental properties that have been constructed in Mountain View in the past 20 years, including for 100 percent affordable properties. The higher rental rate for residential uses and the additional development potential for the site make this site an attractive development opportunity. In addition, the City has several years during the 6th Housing Element cycle implementation period to convince property owners to pursue redevelopment through streamlining, lower fees, and other programs. 475 Ellis St research and development
building used by the City' s largest
company: Google. 475 Ellis, also
known as Google Building E475,
had a number of recent projects
to remodel its laboratories there,
including several in 2021 and
several more in 2022.
The property owners representatives have met with City staff and have expressed interest in redeveloping this site. As stated in the Housing Element Update, recent tenant improvements have not appeared to constrain developer interest in redeveloping other properties in Mountain View.
9 Resolution
No.
18781
Page
483
of
483
Appendix I
City Comments on Sites Identified in Farella Braun + Martel Letter dated March 13, 2023 April 12, 2023
Comment in March 13 FBM Letter City Response
630 San Antonio has existing, current uses of a To provide a more conservative analysis, the City will apply a discount to Rd Little Caesar' s Pizza ( in the main
structure), an 0racare Dental
the estimated capacity for this site.
also in the main structure), and a
La Salsa Mexican restaurant ( in a
building along the street frontage),
in addition to the grocery space
formerly occupied by Sprouts until
June 2022; has more than three
tenant spaces. Utilizing the same
80% discount approach to
realistic capacity would reduce
630 San Antonio from 150 lower
income and 20 moderate down to
30 lower income and 4 moderate
10