ATT 7 - Project Plans — Mountain View City Council, May 23, 2023

BERNARDO AVE

CENTRAL EXPWY

CALTRAIN TRACK
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIFORNIA
189 N BERNARDO AVE

P R O J E C T T E A M

S H E E T I N D E X

ARCHITECTURAL
A-0 COVER SHEET
A-1 VICINITY MAP
A-2 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
A-3 PHOTO SIMULATION BIRDS EYE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
A-4 PHOTO SIMULATION STREET LEVEL LOOKING SOUTHEAST
A-5 PHOTO SIMULATION STREET LEVEL LOOKING FROM CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY A-6 PROJECT RENDERING LOOKING SOUTH
A-7 PROJECT RENDERING LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY A-8a PROJECT RENDERING NORTH SOUTH PASEO
A-8b PROJECT RENDERING BUILDING ENTRANCE VIEW
A-8c PROJECT RENDERING BN PARKING GARAGE AND PROPOSED BUILDING 2 A-9 EXISTING CONDITIONS SITE PLAN
A-10 PROPOSED SITE PLAN
A-11a ZONING CALCULATION AND OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS
A-11b LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATIONS
A-12 PARKING LAYOUT AND CIRCULATION PLAN
A-13 AREA DIAGRAM & GRAPHIC CALCULATION S - EXISTING BUILDING 1 A-14 AREA DIAGRAM & GRAPHIC CALCULATIONS - NEW BUILDING 2 A-15 CODE ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED BUILDING 2
A-16 CODE ANALYSIS PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE
A-17 CODE ANALYSIS TABULATION
A-18 SHADOW STUDY
A-19 EXISTING BUILDING 1 RENOVATION FLOOR PLANS
A-20 PROPOSED BUILDING 2 FLOOR PLANS
A-21 PROPOSED BUILDING 2 FLOOR PLANS
A-22 PROPOSED BUILDING 2 ROOF PLAN
A-23 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE FLOOR PLANS
A-24 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE FLOOR PLANS
A-25 DESIGN IMAGERY EXISTING BUILDING 1 RENOVATION
A-26 EXISTING BUILDING1 ELEVATIONS
A-27 PROPOSED BUILDING 1 RENOVATION ELEVATIONS
A-28 DESIGN IMAGERY PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING 2
A-29 PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING 2 ELEVATIONS
A-30 PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE ELEVATIONS
A-31 MATERIALS AND FINISHES
A-32 SITE SECTIONS
A-33 WALL SECTION AND ENLARGED RENDER
A-34 WALL SECTION AND ENLARGED RENDER
A-35 WALL SECTION AND ENLARGED RENDER
A-36 DETAILS
A-37 DETAILS
A-38 DETAILS
OWNER
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.
445 N. WHISMAN ROAD, SUITE 200
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043
Phone: 650.965.0700
Contact: Rachana Ramesh
Email: [email protected]

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
965 PAGE MILL ROAD
PALO ALTO, CA 94304
Phone: 650.344.1500
Contact: Steve Lynch
Email: [email protected]

ARCHITECT

THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP, INC
181 GREENWICH ST
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
Phone: 415.433.4672
Contact: Gary Laymon
Email: [email protected]

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
SANDIS
1700 S WINCHESTER BLVD, SUITE 200
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
Phone: 408.636.0962
Contact: Steven Yasutake
Email: [email protected]

CIVIL ENGINEER
PROPERTY ADDRESS: PROPOSED
APN:

LOT AREA:

ZONING:

USE:

OCCUPANCY:

TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:

USE:

OCCUPANCY:

TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:

TOTAL OFFICE AREA:

BUILDING COVERAGE:

ALLOWABLE BASE FAR:

TDR:

BASE + TDR:

PROPOSED FAR:

BONUS FAR REQUESTED:

STORIES PROPOSED:

ALLOWABLE HEIGHT:

PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT:

SPRINKLER SYSTEM:

PARKING MAXIMUM ALLOWED:

PARKING PROVIDED:

REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE:

PROVIDED ACCESSIBLE SPACES:

SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING REQUIRED:

SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING PROVIDED:

LONG TERM BIKE PARKING REQUIRED:

LONG TERM BIKE PARKING PROVIDED:
189 N BERNARDO AVENUE
165-36-004
166,877 SF (3.83 AC)
P-41
OFFICE

B OFFICE

II-B(S)

PARKING GARAGE
S2

II-B(S)
142,700 SF
65,610 SF (39.3%)

0.4 BASE (66,750 SF)
28,000 SF
94,750 SF
142,700 SF
(0.85)
47,950 SF
4 STORIES
60'- 0"
75'-0" (WITH BONUS FAR)
75'- 0"
YES
414 STALLS (2.9/1000)
401 STALLS (2.81/1000 )
9 + 2 (VAN)
9 + 2 (VAN)
7 8
71 72
A-39 LEED CHECKLIST
A-40 MOUNTAIN VIEW GREEN BUILDING CHECKLIST
A-41 DESIGN GOALS AND CITY COMMENTS CHECKLIST
CIVIL
C-1.0 COVER SHEET
C-2.0 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PLAN
C-3.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN
C-4.0 UTILITY PLAN
C-5.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
C-6.0 FIRE ACCESS PLAN
C-7.0 TRASH TRUCK TURNING
C-8.0 UNDERCROSSING PLAN

LANDSCAPE
L1.0 MATERIALS, COLORS AND FINISH SCHEDULE
L2.0 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN
L2.1 LANDSCAPE DETAIL PLANS
L2.2 LANDSCAPE DETAIL PLANS
L2.3 ROOF LANDSCAPE DETAIL PLAN
L3.0 LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN
L3.1 LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES AND DETAILS
L4.0 HYDROZONE PLAN
L5.0 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN
L5.1 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN
L5.2 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION PLAN ROOF
L5.3 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES
L5.4 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DETAILS
L5.5 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DETAILS
L5.6 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION DETAILS
L5.7 LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SCHEDULES AND CALCULATIONS
L6.0 LANDSCAPE SECTIONS
L6.1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS
L6.2 LANDSCAPE DETAILS
L6.3 LANDSCAPE DETAILS
L7.0 TREE CANOPY COVERAGE PLAN
L8.0 TREE DISPOSITION PLAN
L8.1 ARBORIST REPORT
L8.2 ARBORIST REPORT
L8.3 ARBORIST REPORT
L8.4 ARBORIST REPORT
L9.0 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
L9.1 SITE LIGHTING CUT SHEETS

V I C I N I T Y M A P

PROJECT SITE
NOTE: REFER TO SHEET A-11 FOR ZONING
CALCULATIONS AND A-12 FOR PARKING ANALYSIS
THE 189 NORTH BERNARDO HAS A SITE AREA OF 3.83 ACRE AND IS LOCATED WITHIN THE EAST WHISMAN PRECISE PLAN AREA.

THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING A NEW OFFICE BUILDING WITH A ROOF DECK AND A PARKING STRUCTURE SITED WITHIN A TWO STORY EXISTING OFFICE DEVELOPMENT. THERE WILL BE MINOR EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS TO THE EXISTING BUILDING TO MAKE IT COHESIVE WITH THE PROPOSED BUILDING. A PROPOSED MULTI-USE PATH AT THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ALONG CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY WILL CONNECT THE PUBLIC CIRCULATION NETWORK IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE EAST WHISMAN PRECISE PLAN. NEW LANDSCAPING WITH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN

SPACE PROVIDE TEXTURAL CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE STRUCTURES ON THE SITE, ENCOURAGE PUBLIC ACCESS THROUGH AND AROUND THE SITE AND ALLOW FOR PRESERVATION OF STANDS OF EXISTING MATURE TREES.

IN SUMMARY, 189 NORTH BERNARDO HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO FIT COMFORTABLY WITHIN THE EXISTING DEVELOPED OFFICE COMPLEX WHILE MAKING A TRANSITION TO THE EAST WHISMAN PRECISE PLAN VISION. THE OFFICE BUILDING MAKES A REFINED STATEMENT WHICH BRINGS AN ACCENT POINT TO THIS AREA WHICH WILL CONTINUE TO BE DEVELOPED WITH MORE ENLIVENED COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY.

P R O J E C T I N F O R M A T I O N

P R O J E C T D E S C R I P T I O N
FORMAL SUBMITTAL 03.26.2020 : RESUBMITTAL-1 09.15.2020 : RESUBMITTAL-2 09.03.2021 : RESUBMITTAL-3 03.28.2022 : RESUBMITTAL-4 05.27.2022 : RESUBMITTAL-5 08.15.2022 : RESUBMITTAL-6 09.30.2022 Attachment 7
HWY 237
HWY 85

BERNARDO AVE

CENTRAL EXPWY

MIDDLEFIELD RD

CALTRAIN TRACK

LIGHT RAIL

TRANSIT STATION

PROJECT SITE
(1.2 miles) (1.3 miles)(2.3 miles)
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

VICINITY MAP
A-1
1/2 MILE RADIUS
1/2" MILE RADIUS

MOUNTAIN VIEW

STATION
BUS
STOP
(0.0 miles)
BIKE
LANE

CALTRAIN

TRACK TRACK

LIGHT RAIL
DNUP
DN
UP
291 N. BERNARDO AVE
EXISTING BUILDING 1
2 STORY OFFICE

C E N T R A L E X P R E S S W A Y
PROPOSED BUILDING 2
4 STORY OFFICE
(E) 1 STORY OFFICE(E) 2 STORY OFFICE
(E) 1 STORY OFFICE

PROPOSED PARKING
GARAGE
GF
J
C
D
E
B
A B
C D
E F
G H
J
H
K
EXISTING 2 STORY OFFICE

ON ADJACENT PROPERTY
PROPOSED BUILDING 2
4 STORY OFFICE

CENTRAL

EXPRESSWAY

NEIGHBORHOOD

CONTEXT
A-2
1:1000
CONTEXT SITE PLAN1
1:500
PROPOSED SITE ELEVATION2

NEW MULTI-USE
PATH

EXISTING

SURFACE

PARKING

PROPOSED

PARKING
GARAGE
IMAGES OF ADJACENT BUILDINGS4
2 A-2
(E) 1 STORY RESIDENTIAL
(E) 2 STORY OFFICE
(E) 1 STORY OFFICE
(E) 1 STORY
OFFICE
1:500
PROPOSED SITE ELEVATION3

PROPOSED

PARKING GARAGE
PROPOSED BUILDING 2
4 STORY OFFICE BUILDING
EXISTING BUILDING 1 RENOVATIONS
2 STORY OFFICE
2 A-2
3 A-2
3 A-2
50' 50'

NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE
297 N. BERNARDO AVE
295 N. BERNARDO AVE
319 N. BERNARDO AVE
329 N. BERNARDO AVE
339 N. BERNARDO AVE
+75'-0"
+35-0"
+45'-0"
+75'-0"
+35'-0"
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022
PL PL
A
K
+68'-0"
+68'-0"
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022 PHOTO SIMULATION

BIRDS EYE VIEW

LOOKING SOUTH
A-3

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

PHOTO SIMULATION STREET

LEVEL VIEW FROM

ADJACENT PROPERTY AND

N BERNARDO AVE
A-4

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

PHOTO SIMULATION

STREET LEVEL VIEW

FROM CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
A-5

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

PROJECT RENDERING

LOOKING SOUTH
A-6

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022 PROJECT RENDERING

LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM

CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
A-7

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

PROJECT RENDERING

PEDESTRIAN LEVEL VIEW

NORTH SOUTH PASEO
A-8a

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

PROJECT RENDERING

PEDESTRIAN LEVEL VIEW

BUILDING ENTRANCE VIEW
A-8b

PROJECT RENDERING

PEDESTRIAN LEVEL VIEW

BETWEEN PARKING GARAGE
AND PROPOSED BUILDING 2
A-8c
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 09.30.2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS

SITE PLAN
A-9
30' 0' 60'

C E N T R A L E X P R E S S W A Y
EXISTING BUILDING 1
2 STORY OFFICE
(TO REMAIN)
± 58,400 SF

SURFACE PARKING
219 STALLS

NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

PROPERTY
LINE 57.40'
R=40'

NON-ACCESS

EASEMENT
84'
5'
18'
47'-10"

EXISTING HERITAGE TREES
1 2
3 PROPERTY LINE

LIGHT FIXTURES
KEYNOTES:
4 FENCE

TRASH ENCLOSURE TO BE REMOVED

SIGNAGE
8 SURFACE PARKING
2 1
9 BIKE PARKING
3 4
5 6
7 8
PROPERTY LINE 947.29'
PROPERTY LINE 724.50' R=1433'
PROPERTY LINE 165.97' R=750'

68.41'
PROPERTY LINE 187.06'
5 EXISTING PG&E AND PT&T EASEMENT
10 RECREATIONAL COURT
9 7
3 1
1 SETBACK
6 10
18'
15'
26'-9"
11 (E) 2 STORY OFFICE
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022
(E) 1 STORY RESIDENTIAL
295 N. BERNARDO AVENUE
(E) 2 STORY OFFICE
291 N. BERNARDO AVENUE
(E) 1 STORY OFFICE
297 N. BERNARDO AVENUE
947'-3"
251'-11"
84'48'

EXISTING OFFICE/ ROAD DEVELOPMENT TO REMAIN
KEYNOTES:
26'-11"
2 57'-5"
127'-7"32'-6"
16'-6"
9'
72'-1"
15'-2"
85'-2"
11 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

NON-ACCESS

EASEMENT
12 12 TRANSFORMER TO BE REMOVED
728'-5"
166'
68'-5"
15'

DNUP
3 9
9 5
DN
UP
± 0.0'- 5.0'
DN
UP
6 1
1 189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022 ZONING CALCULATIONS,

OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS

AND CBC CODE ANALYSIS
A-11a
30' 0' 60'
BUILDING COVERAGE:

PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING

EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING
GARAGE (FOOTPRINT@ GRADE)
18,510 SF
29,520 SF
17,580 SF
ZONING CALCULATIONS:

SITE AREA: 166,877 SF (3.83 AC)
BUILDING AREA:

EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING

PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING

ENCLOSED DECK AREA
59,040 SF
82,865 SF
795 SF
OPEN SPACE ANALYSIS:

PRIVATE DECK OPEN AREAS (ABV.)
(EXCLUDED FOR SITE COVERAGE)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MATRIX:

EWPP
(REQUIRED)

EXISTING OFFICE

PROPOSED OFFICE

PARKING GARAGE

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PROPOSEDAREA(SF)

BUILDING FOOTPRINT
SOFTSCAPE AREA 34,877 SF
65,610 SF
12,288 SF
DRIVEWAY/VEHICLE CIRCULATION 28,360 SF

FAR RATIO AREA (SF)
FAR BREAKDOWN:

LOT COVERAGE %
--

17.0% TOTAL BUILDING AREA 142,700 SF

20.9%
30'
33'-7"
30'-7"

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK
60'-0"
75'-0"
24'-0"
61'-9"
15'-3"
24'-1"
16'-11"
102'-5"

39.3%

COMMON USEABLE OPEN AREA
(PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICALLY-ACCESSIBLE)
23,330 SF 14.0%

COMMON USEABLE

OPEN SPACE

C E N T R A L E X P R E S S W A Y

NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

SURFACE PARKING

PUBLIC OPEN
SPACE
COMMON

USEABLE

OPEN SPACE
COMMON

USEABLE

OPEN SPACE
EXISTING BUILDING -1
2 STORY OFFICE
(TO REMAIN)
PROPOSED BUILDING-2
4 STORY OFFICE

PROPOSED PARKING
GARAGE
MINIMUM LANDSCAPE AREA (30%)
(SOFTSCAPE + COMMON USABLE OPEN AREA
+MULTI-USE PATH)
TOTAL 166,877 SF (100%)
68'-0" TO PARAPET

AT CLOSEST POINT

GREENWAY OR MULTI-USE PATH
(PRIVATELY OWNED PUBLICALLY-ACCESSIBLE)
14,700 SF 8.8%
100%
23'
24'
12'
6'-5"
947'-3"
32'-10" 26'-4" 127'-11"
728'-5"
166'
57'-5"
68'-5"

REQUIRED

SETBACK
15'

REQUIRED

SETBACK
15'
10'
2'
2'
16'-11"
15'-3"

REQUIREDSETBACK
15'
30'-4"
16'-11"
26'-8"
LEGEND
82'-6"
82'-2"

MULTI-USE PATH
74'-2"
143'-5"
49'-2"

REQUUIRED

SETBACK
15'
9'-6"
NORTH
WEST
EAST
SOUTH (@CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY)
15'-0"
15'-0"
(PER EWPP SECTION 3.5, TABLE 8 AND CHARACTER SUB AREAS FIGURE 12) 30'
15'-0"
15'-0" N.A

MINIMUM COMMON USEABLE
OPEN AREA(150SF/1000SF)
50,063 SF
BUILDING HEIGHT:

WITH BONUS FAR:

SETBACKS

OPEN AREA
BASE + TDR
BASE FAR: 0.40
- -
66,750 SF
94,750 SF
FAR

0.4 BASE + TDR

BASE FAR
BONUS FAR REQUESTED: 47,950 SF
PROPOSED FAR0.85
65,610 SF (39.3%)
LANDSCAPE AREA 72,907 SF (43.7%)

TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE
72,907 SF (43.7% > 30% , OK)
21,350 SF 23,330 SF
DRIVEWAY//VEHICLE CIRCULATION 28,360 SF (17.0%)
75'-0" TO STAIR TOWER
PURCHASED TDR 28,000 SF

0.75 BONUS FAR (125,157)
+ TDR (28,000)

TOTAL OPEN AREA
(COMMON USABLE OPEN AREA +MULTI-USE
PATH + PRIVATE DECK OPEN AREA)
- - 50,318 SF
AREA BREAKDOWN:

PROPOSED FAR: 0.85 142,700 SF

0.917 153,157 SF

MEASURED TO PUE
15'15'
NOTE: THE ASSUMED/ IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE IS ONLY PROVIDED TO ILLUSTRATE HOW THE BUILDING ELEMENTS ARE COMPLIANT WITH CALIFORNIOA BUILDING CODE (CBC)FOR REQUIRED SEPARATIONS. - -
25'-6"
24'-1"
24'-6"
NOTE: REFER SHEET A13 AND A14 FOR AREA DIAGRAM AND GRAPHIC CALCULATIONS NOTE: REFER SHEET A13 AND A14 FOR AREA DIAGRAM AND GRAPHIC CALCULATIONS.

BIKE ROOM AND SHOWER ROOM AREAS HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED FROM FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS. 71'-9"
61'-9"
26'

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

N/S PASEO

NORTH-SOUTH PASEO
12'

N/S PASEO
10'
11'-9"
NOTE: THE MONETARY VALUE OF THE COMMUNITY BENEFIT CONTRIBUTION OF $25/BONUS FAR SQUARE FOOT, FOR THE REQUESTED BONUS FAR OF 47,950 SF IS $1,198,750.

SEE CIVIL SHEET C-8.0 FOR A LAND DEDICATION ON EITHER THE 189 N BERNARDO OR 280 N

BERNARDO SITE TO ACCOMMODATE THE BERNARDO UNDERCROSSING AND A SMALL PLAZA AT THE CORNER. WE WILL FOLLOW UP WITH A LAND VALUATION BASED ON TODAY'S FAIR MARKET VALUE TO DETERMINE THE ALTERNATIVE CONTRIBUTION COST. IF THIS CONTRIBUTION DOES NOT REACH THE $1,198,750 REQUIREMENTS, WE WILL BRIDGE THAT GAP WITH THE STANDARD $25/SF COMMUNITY BENEFIT.

DNUP
3 9
9 5
DN
UP
± 0.0'- 5.0'
DN
UP
6 1
1 189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

LANDSCAPE AREA

CALCULATIONS
A-11b
30' 0' 60'
LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS:

AREA(SF)

BUILDING FOOTPRINT
LANDSCAPE AREA 72,907 SF
65,610 SF
DRIVEWAY/VEHICLE CIRCULATION 28,360 SF
LOT COVERAGE %

17.0%

43.7% (> 30% , OK)
30'
33'-7"
30'-7"

PROPERTY LINE

SETBACK
102'-5"

39.3%

COMMON USEABLE

OPEN SPACE

C E N T R A L E X P R E S S W A Y

NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

SURFACE PARKING

PUBLIC OPEN
SPACE
COMMON

USEABLE

OPEN SPACE
COMMON

USEABLE

OPEN SPACE
EXISTING BUILDING -1
2 STORY OFFICE
(TO REMAIN)
PROPOSED BUILDING-2
4 STORY OFFICE

PROPOSED PARKING
GARAGE
100%
23'
24'
12'
6'-5"
947'-3"
32'-10" 26'-4" 127'-11"
728'-5"
166'
57'-5"
68'-5"

REQUIRED

SETBACK
15'

REQUIRED

SETBACK
15'
10'
2'
2'
16'-11"
15'-3"

REQUIREDSETBACK
15'
30'-4"
16'-11"
26'-8"
LEGEND
82'-6"
82'-2"

MULTI-USE PATH
74'-2"
143'-5"
49'-2"

REQUUIRED

SETBACK
15'
9'-6"
30'
15'15'
25'-6"
24'-1"
24'-6"
71'-9"
61'-9"
26'
SITE AREA 166,877 SF

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

NORTH-SOUTH PASEO
NOTE: COMMON USEABLE OPEN AREA AND MULTI-USE PATH HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA. REFER SHEET A-11a FOR DETAILS.

N/S PASEO
12'
10'
11'-5"
11'-9"
HCV
VAN

HCHC HCHCHCHCV HC CS LSLS CS
DNUP
3 9
9 5
DN
UP
± 0.0'- 5.0'
DN
UP
HC
HC
HCEV
EV
EV
EV
EV
6 EV EV EV EV EV EV
1 EV
1 CSLS
VAN
LS CS
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 09.30.2022
NORTH BERNARDO AVENUEPROPERTY LINE 947.34'
PROPERTY LINE 724.47' R=1433'
PROPERTY LINE 165.97' R=750'

68.41'

PROPERTY
LINE 57.40'
R=40'
PROPERTY LINE 186.96'

PARKING LAYOUT &

CIRCULATION PLAN
A-1230' 0' 60'

C E N T R A L E X P R E S S W A Y

NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

SURFACE PARKING
30 STALLS

PUBLIC OPEN
SPACE
1 2
3 PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE TRAIL - MULTI-USE PATH

BIKE RACKS
KEYNOTES:
4 VEHICULAR DROP OFF ZONE
5 ACCESSIBLE PARKING

FIRE TRUCK HAMMERHEAD
6 7
8 9
10 11
3 4
4 1 1
8 REQUIRED

ACCESSIBLE STALLS (HC)

PROVIDED
9 9
PARKING SUMMARY:

ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STALLS (EV)

LONG TERM BICYCLE PARKING

PARKING GARAGE

SURFACE PARKING
367 STALLS
30 STALLS
36 36
4 4

SHORT TERM BICYCLE PARKING

CAR SHARE SPACES (CS)
8 71 72
SHOWERS 2 2
MAXIMUM 414 397
LOADING SPACES (LS) 4 4
ACCESSIBLE VAN STALLS (HCV) 2 2
7 MAXIMUM 2.9/1000 2.78/1000

PARKING STALLS

PARKING RATIO

TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING
TOTAL PARKING STALLS 397 STALLS

EV PARKING (EV)
2 79

LONG TERM BIKE STORAGE
11 ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING
10 SHOWER ROOMS
9 322 5 2 2 4
EXISTING BUILDING -1
2 STORY OFFICE
(TO REMAIN)
PROPOSED BUILDING-2
4 STORY OFFICE

PROPOSED PARKING
GARAGE
80 12 LOADING SPACE (LS)
13 CAR SHARE (CS)
13 12
9 14 GATE AT PARKING ENTRANCE
14 4
1 A-12
1"=10'
STANDARD DOUBLE STRIPED PARKING SPACE1
30'
24'
15'
26'-4"
9'
15'
R28'
R28'
R28'
R28'
120'
72' 8'-6"
26' 18'
26' 18'18' 15'-6"

MULTI-USE PATH
5 COMMON USEABLE

OPEN SPACE
COMMON

USEABLE

OPEN SPACE
COMMON

USEABLE

OPEN SPACE

RELOCATED TRANSFORMER

TRASH ENCLOSURE
7 33'-7"
30'
14'
LEGEND

HC - ACCESSIBLE STALLS

HCV - ACCESSIBLE VAN STALLS

LS - LOADING SPACES

CS - CAR SHARE SPACES

EV - ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STALLS
9'
18'
9'
1'
9'
4"
1'-8"
9'
MOTORCYCLE PARKING 14- -
NOTE: REFER A20 AND A21 PARKING GARAGE ANALYSIS
57'-6"
TOTAL BUILDING AREA (INCL. ENCLOSED DECKS) 142,700 SFSITE ENTRY

VEHICLE ENTRY

BUILDING ENTRANCE

PUBLIC STREET

CLASS II BIKE LANE

DRIVEWAY

VEHICLE TURNAROUND

PEDESTRIAN PATH

BIKE PATH

MULTI-USE PATH

NORTH-SOUTH PASEO
LEGEND
1 3
3 1 6

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

PRIVATELY-OWNED,

PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE

OPEN SPACE

NORTH-SOUTH
PASEO

NORTH SOUTH
PASEO
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022
16' 0' 32'
1 2
3 NEW ENTRY DOOR W/ CLEAR

GLAZING/ CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
KEYNOTES:
4 EXIT STAIRS

RESTROOM
A-19
EXISTING BUILDING 1

RENOVATION FLOOR PLANS
24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"11'-11" 36'-0"48'-0"48'-0"
24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"24'-0"11'-11" 36'-0"48'-0"48'-0"
84'-0"
71'-10"
48'-0"
60'-2"
12'-4" 48'-1"
72'-0"
84'-0"
71'-10"
48'-0"
60'-2"
12'-4" 48'-1"
72'-0"
1 2 23 3

ELEVATOR
4 2 1
2 23 3
42 5 NEW DOUBLE DOOR
6 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 1 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 2
29,520 SF 29,520 SF 6 METAL CLADDING
7 NEW CANOPY
7 67 6 6
56 189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022
16' 0' 32'
LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 1 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 2
34'-0"34'-0"34'-0"
102'-0"
2'-6"
28'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"
178'-0"
34'-0"34'-0"34'-0"
102'-0"
2'-6"
30'-0"28'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"
17,765 SF 20,870 SF
30'-0"
178'-0"
1 2
3 ENTRY DOOR W/ CLEAR GLAZING

ELEVATORS
KEYNOTES:
4 LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
CANOPY
6 7

EXIT STAIRS

MEN'S RESTROOM

WOMEN'S RESTROOM
1 2
3 14
5 5
7 6
15 7 6
A-20
PROPOSED BUILDING 2

FLOOR PLANS
STAIR 1
STAIR 2

ELEVATOR
LOBBY
WOMEN
MEN
STAIR 1
STAIR 2

ELEVATOR
LOBBY
WOMEN
MEN
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
5 STAIR 3
5 STAIR 3
8 SHOWER ROOM
11 9

BIKE ROOM

EXISTING
BUILDING -1
12 PARKING
GARAGE

C E N T R A L E X P R E S S W A Y
5 10

RECESSED DOWN LIGHTS
10 10
8 9
8 9
11 12
13 ELECTRICAL ROOM

IDF ROOM

JANITOR
25'-3"
5 STAIR 4
20'-2"
17'-5"
5 STAIR 4
DECK
660 SF

MULTI-USE PATH
14 VERTICAL METAL FINS15
15'-0"
30'-0"
1'-6"
30'-0"
15 2
4'-0"
5 13

UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
14 1414
13 LOBBY
24'-4"
25'-6"
26'-8"
15'-5"
25'-1"
1'-6"
4 3
14 3

BIKE ROOM
2 A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022
22,105 SF
LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 1 20,255 SF
LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN 2
STAIR 2 STAIR 2
A-21
PROPOSED BUILDING 2

FLOOR PLANS
16' 0' 32'
15 5
7 6 15
5 7 6
STAIR 1

ELEVATOR
LOBBY
WOMEN
MEN
STAIR 1

ELEVATOR
LOBBY
WOMEN
MEN
5 STAIR 3
5 STAIR 3
10 8
9 10
8 9
34'-0"34'-0"34'-0"
102'-0"
8'-6"28'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"
178'-0"
25'-3"
28'-3"
34'-0"34'-0"34'-0"
102'-0"
8'-6"28'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"
178'-0"
25'-3"
28'-3"
STAIR 4STAIR 4
DECK
930 SF
55 4'-0"
15 15 15
1 2
3 ENTRY DOOR W/ CLEAR GLAZING

ELEVATORS
KEYNOTES:
4 LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE
CANOPY
6 7

EXIT STAIRS

MEN'S RESTROOM

WOMEN'S RESTROOM
8 SHOWER ROOM
9 BIKE ROOM
5 10

RECESSED DOWN LIGHTS
11 12
13 ELECTRICAL ROOM

IDF ROOM

JANITOR
14 VERTICAL METAL FINS15
DECK
630 SF
14 14
14 14

UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM
3'-6"
4'-0"3'-6"
3 14
3 2
A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
73'-0"
65'-0"
68'-0"
ROOF PLAN 1
28'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"
178'-0"
25'-1"34'-0"34'-0"34'-0"
102'-0"
4'-0"

OCCUPIED

DECK AREA

LANDSCAPE

AND SEATING AREA
PROPOSED BUILDING 2

ROOF PLAN
A-22
1 2
3 SINGLE PLY ROOFING

ELEVATORS
KEYNOTES:
4 5

OCCUPIED DECK AREA
6 7

EXIT STAIRS

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREEN
15 2
4 8 COLUMN

DECK BELOW
5 BUILDING AREA : 1,870 SF
OCCUPIED DECK AREA : 10,070 SF
7 APPROXIMATE SIZE

AND LOCATION OF

MECHANICAL

EQUIPMENT WITH
P. V. PANELS ABOVE
2 2'-6"
16' 0' 32'
2'-6"
STAIR 2
STAIR 3
STAIR 4
STAIR 1
73'-0"
68'-0"
64'-0"
PV FLOOR PLAN 2
28'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"
178'-0"
23'-0"34'-0"34'-0"34'-0"
102'-0"
2'-6"
2'-6"

PV PANEL
3 1'-6"
4'-0"
1'-6"
65'-3"
108'-10"
2 A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
2 A-32
1 A-32
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022
5 9
9 10
10 7
DN
UP
- 15.0'
-10.0'
UP
89 8
5 7
5 3
7 6
26 9
UP
6 1
1 MC
UP
MC
5 4
UP -20.0'
5 10
7 7
16 7
1 UP
3 9
MC5

PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE

FLOOR PLANS
A-23
58,020 SF
52'-3"
387'-5"
95'-3"
94'-11"
GARAGE LEVEL B-1 FLOOR PLAN1
19'-3"
18'

AREA & STALL COUNT

PART OF GARAGE
LEVEL B-1
26,680 SF
GARAGE LEVEL B-2 FLOOR PLAN2
1 2
3 1 2 8
30' 0' 60'
38'
162'-9"
2 A-32
2 A-32
5'
9'-6"
GARAGE LEVEL 1
GARAGE LEVEL 2
GARAGE LEVEL 3
GARAGE LEVEL 4
GARAGE LEVEL B-1
GARAGE LEVEL B-2
34 STALLS
37 STALLS
40 STALLS
40 STALLS
151 STALLS
65 STALLS
18' 18'18' 24'18'18' 24'
24' 18'
26'-6"18'
18'
GARAGE PARKING ANALYSIS:
11'-2"
TOTAL 367 STALLS

ACCESSIBLE PARKING

EV CHARGING
3 STALLS
36 STALLS
4 PROPOSED BUILDING -2 FOOTPRINT

ABOVE GROUND
GARAGE LEVEL B-1

FOOT PRINT ABOVE
GARAGE LEVEL-1 FOOTPRINT

ABOVE GROUND
9'
20'-11"
26'76'-6"
64'-3" 20'-10"
24'
43'-6"
42'-3" 38'
162'-9"
9'-6"
18'
9'
20'-11"
64'-3" 20'-10"
349'
406'-8"
197'-9"
24'
62' 36'-10"
95'-3"26'15'-6"
136'-9"
18' 18'18' 24'
STAIR 1
STAIR 2
STAIR 5
STAIR 6
STAIR 7
18'
STAIR 1
STAIR 2
STAIR 5
41'-7" 43'-6" 36'-10"
NOTE: REFER SHEET A-12 FOR PARKING TABULATION
RAMP B-1
RAMP L-1
RAMP B-1
KEYNOTES:
1 2
3 ELEVATORS
4 5
6 STANDARD PARKING STALL

GREEN SCREEN

ACCESSIBLE STALL
STAIR

PERIMETER WALL
7 EV CHARGER (DUAL)
8 STRUCTURAL COLUMN
9 TENSILE MESH FACADE SCREEN
10 PV PANEL
LEGEND

HC - ACCESSIBLE STALLS

HCV - ACCESSIBLE VAN STALLS

EV - ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STALLS

LS - LOADING SPACES

CS - CAR SHARE SPACES

MC - MOTORCYCLE SPACES
11 METAL VERTICAL FINS
UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM12
CANOPY13
24' 18'
24'
24'
2 A-32
2 A-32
18'24' 18'
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 09.30.2022
+ 25.0'
9 9
+30.0'9
DN
5 UP
DNUP
6 1
1 DNUP
3 9
9 5
DN
UP
± 0.0'- 5.0'
DN
UP
HC
HC
HCEV
EV
EV
EV
EV
6 EV EV EV EV EV EV
1 EV
1 9
9 UP
9 DN
5 UP
DNUP
+20.0'+ 15.0'
6 1
1 9
9 UP
+10.0'+ 5.0'
6 DN
5 UP
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
EV
6 EV EV EV EV EV EV
1 DNUP
EV
1 189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022

PROPOSED PARKING GARAGE

FLOOR PLANS
A-24
63'-5"
193'-4"
114'-6"
17,580 SF
GARAGE LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN118,060 SF
GARAGE LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLANS3
18,060 SF
GARAGE LEVEL 4 FLOOR PLAN4
KEYNOTES:
1 2
3 ELEVATORS
4 5
6 STANDARD PARKING STALL

ACCESSIBLE STALL
STAIR

PERIMETER WALL
30' 0' 60'
63'-5"
193'-4"
114'-6"
7 EV CHARGER (DUAL)
2 A-32
2 A-32
18' 26'-6"
18' 24' 18'18'24'
18' 26'-6"
24' 18'
18' 24' 18'18'24'
9'-6"
5'
9'-6"
188'-4"
20'-10"64'-3"94'-11"
188'-4"
20'-10"64'-3"94'-11"
8 STRUCTURAL COLUMN
9 TENSILE MESH FACADE SCREEN
79 5'
18' 26'-6" 18'
17,580 SF
GARAGE LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN2
63'-5"
18' 26'-6" 18'
18' 24' 18'18'24'
8 8'-4" 8'-4"
193'-4"
114'-6"
5'
9'-6"
188'-4"
20'-10"64'-3"94'-11" 8'-4"
63'-5"
18' 24' 18'18'24'
193'-4"
114'-6"
5'
9'-6"
188'-4"
20'-10"64'-3"94'-11" 8'-4"
24' 18'18'
18'
STAIR 5
STAIR 6
STAIR 7
18'
STAIR 5
STAIR 6
STAIR 7
STAIR 5
STAIR 6
STAIR 5
STAIR 6
18'
24'
24'
4 2
5 1
GARAGE PV PANEL FLOOR PLAN5
63'-5"
193'-4"
114'-6"
188'-4"
20'-10"50'-5"62'-8" 8'-4"
10 PV PANEL
10 9
LEGEND

HC - ACCESSIBLE STALLS

HCV - ACCESSIBLE VAN STALLS

EV - ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STALLS

LS - LOADING SPACES

CS - CAR SHARE SPACES

MC - MOTORCYCLE SPACES
RAMP L-1
RAMP L-2
RAMP L-2
RAMP L-3
RAMP L-3
RAMP L-4
RAMP L-4
RAMP L-4
(BELOW)
11 METAL VERTICAL FINS
32'-3" 13'-10"
RAMP L-4
(BELOW)
RAMP L-4
(BELOW)
4 11
UNITIZED CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM12
CANOPY
6 12 12
11 12
2 A-32
2 A-32
2 A-32
2 A-32
2 A-32
2 A-32
2 A-32
2 A-32
9 9

DESIGN IMAGERY
EXISTING BUILDING 1 RENOVATION
A-25
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 09.30.2022
ENTRY

OUTDOOR

RECREATION
NEW

LANDSCAPING
EXISTING BUILDING 1 PLAN

EXISTING ENTRANCE

EXISTING OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREAS

EXISTING COLUMN PILASTER CLADDING

PROPOSED ENTRANCE PROPOSED OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREAS

PROPOSED
BUILDING 2

EXISTING BUILDING

PROPOSED ALUMINUM METAL

PANEL CLADDING

EXISTING
BUILDING 1
PROPOSED BUILDING 1 RENOVATION RENDER

PROPOSED STUCCO REVEALS

EXISTING STUCCO FINISH
STUCCO
COLOR

05.27.2022

08.15.2022

DN
DN

DESIGN IMAGERY
PROPOSED BUILDING 2
A-28
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 09.30.2022
PROPOSED BUILDING 2 PLAN

FRITTED GLASS FACADE

ROOF DECK

FRITTED GLASS FACADE

METAL FINS

FRITTED GLASS AND VERTICAL FINS FACADE VERTICAL METAL FINS

ROOF DECK ROOF DECK
PROPOSED BUILDING 2 RENDER

CLEAR AND SPANDREL GLASS FACADE

CLEAR AND SPANDREL

GLASS FACADE

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 08.15.2022
PARKING STRUCTURE - MATERIALS AND COLORS3

MATERIALS AND FINISHES
A-31
NEW OFFICE BUILDING - MATERIALS AND COLORS2
EXISTING BUILDING - MATERIALS AND COLORS1

SG ALUMINUM CLADDING,

ALUCOBOND, METAL PANEL,
COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED
A1
GUARDIAN BIRD1ST UV STRIPE COATING,
SN68 (#4) PAIRED WITH GUARDIAN SUN

GUARD LOW-E COATINGS
CG1 FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS, GUARDIAN
GLASS, GUARDIAN DECO HT, COLOR:

WARM GREY

SG LOUVERED METAL ROOF SCREEN,
CASCADE ROOFTOP SCREENS, COLOR:

SLATE GRAY
MS
CG1 PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL,
PCI, 127, COLOR: BUFF/TAN
PCGUARDIAN BIRD1ST UV STRIPE COATING,
SN68 (#4) PAIRED WITH GUARDIAN SUN

GUARD LOW-E COATINGS

CANTILEVERED CANOPY - MASA ARCHITECTURAL CANOPIES - EXTRUDECK ALUMINUM

SUNSHADE SYSTEM
C
METAL FINISH - TIGER DYRLAC 38/91020 - ANODIZED SILVER
TENSILE MESH FAÇADE SCREEN, STRUCTURFLEX
FABRIC : COATED PES MESH - SERGE FERRARI SOLTIS FT 381
FRAME : FACID 65 ALUMINUM FRAME
PS

CLEAR GLASS - GUARDIAN GLASS - GUARDIAN

ULTRACLEAR LOW-IRON GLASS
CG1
CG2

FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS, GUARDIAN
GLASS, GUARDIAN DECO HT, COLOR:

WARM GREY

EXISTING CLEAR GRAY GLASS - GUARDIAN GLASS,

GUARDIAN ULTRACLEAR LOW-IRON GLASS
COLOR: GRAY
*(THIS IS EXISTING GLASS MATERIAL TO REMAIN)

FRITTED GLASS, BENDHEIM GLASS,

LINEAR PATTERN FRITTED

RAINSCREEN GLASS
FG

ALUMINUM CLADDING,

ALUCOBOND, METAL PANEL,
COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED
A1

ALUMINUM CLADDING,

ALUCOBOND, METAL PANEL,
COLOR: DARK GRAY ANODIZED
A2

FROSTED SPANDREL GLASS, GUARDIAN
GLASS, GUARDIAN DECO HT, COLOR:

WARM GREY
SG

ALUMINUM CLADDING,

ALUCOBOND, METAL PANEL,
COLOR: CLEAR ANODIZED
A1
ALUMINUM METAL FINS @

PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING
MF
ALUMINUM METAL FINS @

PARKING GARAGE
MF
SP STUCCO PAINT, DUNN EDWARDS DE6122

DRY CREEK

FRITTED GLASS, BENDHEIM GLASS,

LINEAR PATTERN FRITTED

RAINSCREEN GLASS
FG

WOOD CLADDING - GEOLAM PANELS,
VERTIGO 5010, COLOR : TEAK
WC

WOOD CLADDING - GEOLAM PANELS,
VERTIGO 5010, COLOR : TEAK
WC
189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 09.30.2022

SITE SECTION
A-32
1/16" = 1'-0"
BUILDING SECTION AA1
1/16" = 1'-0"
BUILDING SECTION BB2
1 A-32
2 A-32
PROPOSED BUILDING 2

CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
(E)SURFACE

PARKING

PROPOSED

PARKING GARAGE
PROPOSED BUILDING 2

PROPOSED PARKING
GARAGE
19'-2"" TO

PROPERTY
LINE
2'-6" TO

PROPERTY LINE

PROPERTY LINE
24'-0" TO

PROPERTY
LINE
31'-8"
EXISTING BUILDING 1

EXISTING
2 STORY OFFICE

BUILDING ON ADJACENT PROPOERTY

PROPERTY LINE
5 5
3 74'-6"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0"
44'-6"
10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"10'-0"
16' 0' 32'

CIRCULATION
CORE
10'-0"10'-0"
+16'-0"
0'-0" (F.F.E. 91.10')
-10'-0"
-20'-0"
+32'-0"
+48'-0"
+74'-6"
+64'-0"

LEVEL PV
75'-0"
16'-0" 16'-0" 16'-0" 10'-11"16'-0"10'-0"10'-0"
ROOF
LEVEL 4
LEVEL 3
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
LEVEL B-1
LEVEL B-2
-10'-0"
-20'-0"
ROOF
+64'-0"
LEVEL 4
+48'-0"
LEVEL 3
+32'-0"
LEVEL 2
+16'-0"
LEVEL 1
0'-0" (F.F.E. 91.10')
LEVEL B-1
LEVEL B-2
+45'-0"
T.O. ROOF
+30'-0"
LEVEL 4
+20'-0"
LEVEL 3
+10'-0"
LEVEL 2
LEVEL 1
0'-0"
7 3

MULTI-USE PATH
T.O. DRIVEWAY
-0'-6" (90.94')
T.O. GRADE
-0'-8" (90.90')
T.O. PARAPET
+68'-0" (159.10')
4'-0"6'-6"
T.O. CURB
0'-0" (91.10')
T.O. GRADE
-1'-0" (90.79')
BIKE
ROOM
KEYNOTES:
1 2
3 CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - CLEAR GLASS
5CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM - FRITTED GLASS
4 METAL VERTICAL FINS

LOUVERED METAL ROOF SCREEN
6 7
8 ALUMINUM METAL PANEL CALDDING
9 DECK WITH CLEAR GLASS SYSTEM
10ROOF DECK

ROOF PV PANELS

ALUMINUM METAL PANEL CANOPY
4'-6"
T.O.STAIR TOWER
+74'-11"
5 4
22 1
8 10

TENSILE MESH FACADE SCREEN
6 3 9 9
9 5

HEIGHT LIMIT WITH BONUS FAR
+75'-0"

189 NORTH BERNARDO AVENUE

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

SAND HILL PROPERTY COMPANY
KENNETH RODRIGUES & PARTNERS, INC.

32.625 09.30.2022
- Retain trees as much as possible or replant /
relocate elsewhere. Meander multi-use path to
retain existing trees as much as possible. New
trees to be native trees.
- Make POPOs more accessible way finding
through design with opened up entry points and
signages. Enhance the design and programming
in POPO areas.
- Reduce building footprint in Level 1 to have a
wider buffer between building and multi-use path.

Enhance ground plane connection between the
building and open spaces
- Strong N/S paseo connection from multi-use path
to the adjacent site. Hammer head to have
enhanced paving.
- Reevaluate the asphalt frontage at main entry to
the building areas to soften the appearance.

Reduce surface parking and paved/asphalt area
to preserve trees, provide green screen and
increase landscape area.
- Trash and transformer to be relocated away from
the center open space area.
- Horizontal emphasis of the building wrap looks
great. Vertical stair elements to be
de-emphasized as it conflicts with this wrap
theme. Recess Level 1 to give floating glass
building appearance.
- Garage design to be more compatible with office
building and garage entry to be more prominent.
- Bird safe glass to be used.

DESIGN GOALS PROPOSED

REDESIGN

DESIGN GOALS AND CITY

COMMENTS CHECKLIST
A-41

Bike Lockers
Concrete Colors
Bike Rack
Accent Paving on Structure
Permeable Paving
Multi-Use Sport Court
Stone Accent Wall and Seat Wall
Outdoor Seating and Office Working Areas
Multi-Use Path
Outdoor Dining and BBQ Area
Pedestrian Pole Lights and Bollard Lights
Sculptural Stones
Games
Reclaimed Redwood Signage
Reclaimed Redwood Benches
Living Wall

08.15.2022

08.15.2022
Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

Tree Tag #
To be Removed Per
2023 Revision Sheet
L8.0
Author Recommends
Removal Due to Very
Poor Condition or
Elevated Risk of Failure
Trunk 1 (in.)
Trunk 2 (in.)
Trunk 3 (in.)
Trunk 4 (in.)
Trunk 5 (in.)
Trunk 6 (in.)
Adjusted Trunk
Diameter Inches @ 54”
A.G. (1+2+3+4+5)
"Heritage Tree" per
City of Mountain
View, CA
(3.8" Dia. Quercus,
Cedrus, Sequoia, and

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(0-100% each)
Overall Condition
Rating (0-100%)
Live Twig Density
(Very Poor, Poor, Mod,
Good, Exc.)
Lopsided Canopy
(Direction Noted)
Trunk Lean
(Direction Noted)
Historical Stem Splitout
Evidence
(Note Elevation)
Severely Pruned in Past
(topping, liontailing,
shearing)
Buried Root Crown
(BRC) or Girdling Roots
(GR)
Twig, Branch, Limb
Decay (Note Elevation)
Codominant Mainstems
with Severe Bark
Inclusion(s)

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
1 X 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 22/20 45/45 45% Poor Poor X
2 X 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/20 50/45 48% Poor Poor
3 Est. 18 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Est. 18 X coast live oak Quercus agrifolia 45/25 80/65 77% Good Good South South Sycamore borers between zero and 20 feet.

Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.

Trunk buffer if possible to
install.
4 Est. 16 Est. 16 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Est. 32 X coast live oak Quercus agrifolia 45/25 80/50 64% Fair Good South South X Chain link fencing is embedded in lower mainstem zero to 2 feet.

Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.

Trunk buffer if possible to
install.
5 Est. 13 Est. 12 Est. 9 Est. 9 Est. 7 0.0 Est. 50 X Shamel ash Fraxinus uhdei 55/40 75/55 65% Fair Mod South
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.

Trunk buffer if possible to
install.
6 X X 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/12 35/20 20% Very Poor Poor GR Yes. At 5 feet.
7 X X 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 Raywood ash
Fraxinus ' Raywood' 25/10 30/20 25% Very Poor Poor X 4 to 6 feet
Raywood ash decline syndrome.

Girdling roots or other anomaly at
grade.
8 X X 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/18 50/25 29% Very Poor Poor to
Mod East X At 6 feet.
9 X X 14.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 Raywood ash
Fraxinus
'Raywood' 35/20 25/25 25% Very Poor Poor North X Raywood ash decline syndrome. 10 31.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 85/25 85/85 85% Good Good
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
11 32.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.1 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 90/25 85/85 85% Good Good
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 1 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
12 32.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 90/25 80/40 60% Fair Mod Yes. At 45
feet.

Use cables (or brace rod at fork at
45 feet) to stabilize fork.

Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
13 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 85/25 80/80 80% Good Mod to
Good
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
14 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.3 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 85/25 80/40 58% Fair Mod to
Good At 45 feet. Use cables (or brace at the fork at
45 feet) to stabilize the fork.

Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
15 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 85/25 80/68 75% Good Good
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
16 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.9 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 85/25 85/80 80% Good Good
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
17 25.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 85/20 85/75 80% Good Good South At 45 feet. Use cables (or brace at the fork at 45 feet) to stabilize the fork.

Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
18 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.2 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 85/20 85/75 80% Good Good South
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
19 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 80/20 75/68 70% Good Mod Apical meristem appears to have split out in the past.

Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
20 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/25 70/65 70% Good Mod S-form at 70 feet.

Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
21 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/25 70/70 70% Good Mod
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 2 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
22 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/25 70/70 70% Good Mod
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
23 22.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.9 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/25 75/75 75% Good Mod
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
24 20.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 65/25 75/75 75% Good Mod
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
25 21.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 58/25 83/75 80% Good Mod to
Good
Chain link fence,TriAx triaxial
geogrid, Water applied heavy via
hoses and/or existing system.
26 X 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 Purple robe robinia
Robinia ' Purple
Robe' 25/15 70/40 48% Poor Mod GR X X
27 X 6.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 Purple robe robinia
Robinia ' Purple
Robe' 28/15 70/50 57% Fair Mod X X
28 X
29 18.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 X American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 50/35 80/50 60% Fair Good West GR At 14 feet Use cables (and/or brace at the
fork at 14 feet) if tree is retained,
to stabilize the fork.

Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
30 X 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 50/20 70/65 69% Fair Mod
31 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 55/20 70/60 63% Fair Mod West
Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
32 X 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 50/20 60/60 60% Fair Mod West
33 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 London plane
cultivar
Platanus x
acerifolia Cult. 48/30 85/70 76% Good Good South
west
South
west
Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
(Tree has been removed from site as of 5/25/2022, assumedly due to tree death, though not verified).

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 3 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
34 X 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 45/25 60/70 67% Fair Mod West West 35 X 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 45/20 60/60 60% Fair Mod
36 X 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 35/18 50/30 39% Poor Poor to
Mod West West GR
37 X 13.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 40/25 60/30 36% Poor Mod West West GR X X 38 X X 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 American
sweetgum
Liquidambar styraciflua 50/18 50/20 27% Very Poor Poor to Mod 9 feet GR X
No buttress roots on west side.

Codominant mainstem splitout at 9
feet.
39 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 80/20 80/65 75% Good Mod West
Trunk buffer and chain link
fencing. Heavy irrigation during
construction.
40 X 34.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.2 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/30 85/65 75% Good Good West
41 X 26.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/18 75/67 72% Good Mod South
42 X 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 60/18 75/65 70% Good Mod West
43 X 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.1 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/20 85/70 77% Good Good West
44 X 26.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/20 80/70 75% Good Mod West
Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 4 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
45 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 75/20 70/70 70% Good Mod South
Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
46 X 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 75/25 80/70 78% Good Good South
47 22.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.1 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/18 75/65 70% Good Mod West No buttress roots on west side.

Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
48 X 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.3 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 65/20 75/65 73% Good Mod No buttress roots on south side. 49 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/15 75/65 70% Good Mod No buttress roots on south side.

Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
50 20.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/18 75/65 73% Good Mod West
Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
51 X 21.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/22 80/70 75% Good Good West
52 X 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.7 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/22 85/73 77% Good Good West
53 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 65/16 70/60 68% Fair Mod
Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
54 X 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/20 80/68 75% Good Mod
55 X 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 55/14 70/60 68% Fair Mod West
Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 5 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
56 X 21.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.3 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/16 80/65 70% Good Mod West
57 X 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.4 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/16 80/70 77% Good Mod West
58 T 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 17/8 90/90 90% Exc. Good Need to remove stakes and ties from this tree ASAP if retained.
(TREE EXPECTED TO BE

TRANSPLANTED PER PROJECT
TEAM DISCUSSION, 7/5/2022)
59 X 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 17/8 90/90 90% Exc. Good Need to remove stakes and ties from this tree ASAP.
60 Est. 5 Est. 5 Est. 4 Est. 2 Est. 2 0.0 Est. 18 X coast live oak Quercus agrifolia 23/15 90/40 45% Poor Good
Note chain link embedded in the
mainstems. Tree was cut down to
uknown elevation in the past.

Current canopy consists of
resprouts arising from the cut
stump.

Chain link fencing and trunk
buffer.
61 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 X coast live oak
Quercus agrifolia 23/13 90/63 75% Good Good S-trunk zero to 6 feet.

Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels.

Irrigate only if damages are
occurring to root system within
15 feet of trunk edge.
62 X 12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 40/18 85/75 80% Good Good
63 X 19.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 50/25 80/75 78% Good Mod to
Good
64 X 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 45/20 70/65 68% Fair Mod Tree is stunted in shade of nearby eucalyptus #65 to the South.
65 X 57.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.5 X Eucalyptus species (see right)
Tree is likely
either
Eucalyptus leucoxylon or Eucalyptus
viminalis. There were no fruits or
buds on the
85/65 78/50 60% Fair Mod Yes. At 4 to
6 feet.

Use cabling and/or through bolt
bracing to stabilize the bark
inclusion type fork? Note however
that these support systems may
not actually have any efficacy in
the case of this tree.
66 X 5.5 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.1 European olive
Olea europaea 20/20 70/50 57% Fair Mod South South X
Tree as pruned to remove lower
material (liontailing). Permanently
damaged from this pruning.

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 6 of 14

08.15.2022
Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
67 X 7.0 7.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 26.0 European olive
Olea europaea 25/20 75/55 65% Fair Mod South South X
Tree as pruned to remove lower
material (liontailing). Permanently
damaged from this pruning.
68 X 21.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 50/25 85/65 73% Good Mod to
Good
Missing buttress roots on west
side.
69 X 17.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.7 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 50/20 85/65 73% Good Mod to
Good
Missing buttress roots on south
side.
70 X 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 50/20 77/55 60% Fair Mod to
Good West
GR
north
side.

Lean caused by girdling roots, and
corrects to vertical.
71 X X
15" at
48"
above
grade

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15" purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/20 50/30 35% Poor Poor J-roots. X At 48" elev. X Significant twig decline. 72 X 5.0 5.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 green leaf plum
Prunus
cerasifera (wild) 15/20 75/35 55% Fair Mod At 1-foot
elev.
73 X 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 35/15 80/60 70% Good Mod to
Good No buttress roots on south side.
74 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 32/15 75/60 65% Fair Mod to
Good
GR east
side of
root
crown.

Chain link fencing and trunk
buffer. Irrigate where possible
during construction.
75 X 9.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.6 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 25/10 75/55 65% Fair Mod to
Good South No buttress roots on south side.
76 X 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 30/13 60/45 53% Fair Poor to
Mod
77 X X 8.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/6 20/15 17% Very Poor Very
Poor North North X Decline througout canopy.
78 X 12.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.2 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/18 35/30 33% Poor Poor West
79 X X 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/9 25/25 25% Very Poor Very
Poor West West X
Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 7 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
80 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 35/12 75/65 70% Good Mod No buttress roots on south side.

Chain link fencing and trunk
buffer. Irrigate where possible
during construction.
81 X 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 30/8 75/60 67% Fair Mod No buttress roots on south side. 82 X 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 33/12 75/65 70% Good Mod No buttress roots on east side. 83 X 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 35/12 75/65 70% Good Mod No buttress roots on west side. 84 X 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 35/13 78/58 65% Fair Mod West No buttress roots on west side. 85 X X

10.7 at
48"
above
grade.

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.7 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/6 20/20 20% Very Poor Very
Poor West GR X X Canopy dieback throughout
86 X X 12.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 45/13 80/67 73% Good Mod Suppressed by tree #89. 87 X X 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 60/18 75/72 74% Good Mod
88 X X 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 70/25 75/65 70% Good Mod South No buttress roots on east side. 89 X X 32.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 60/55 75/65 70% Good Mod West
90 X X 35.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.5 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/45 75/65 70% Good Mod East X
91 X X 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 X Raywood ash
Fraxinus ' Raywood' 40/40 25/25 25% Very Poor Poor GR X Raywood ash decline syndrome.

Will likely need to remove this tree
prematurely due to predisposition
to this new disease.
92 X X 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.3 X Raywood ash
Fraxinus ' Raywood' 45/25 25/25 25% Very Poor Poor GR? X Raywood ash decline syndrome.

Will likely need to remove this tree
prematurely due to predisposition
to this new disease.

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 8 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
93 X 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.8 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/20 60/50 54% Fair Poor to
Mod East East
94 X 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/35 50/40 47% Poor Poor East
95 X 18.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/35 50/40 45% Poor Poor East
96 X 20.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/45 55/45 50% Fair Poor
97 X 15.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.8 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 40/30 55/45 50% Fair Poor to
Mod North South X GR X
98 X 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.7 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 40/35 45/45 45% Poor Poor South X X
99 X (Monitor tree
for declines) 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.5 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/35 30/30 30% Poor Poor West X X
100 X 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/30 35/35 35% Poor Poor X
Buttress roots appear to have
been severed during walkway
renovation. Tree recently topped.
101 X 18.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/30 35/40 40% Poor Poor X Roots deflected from an earlier curb line. Recently topped.
102 X 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/20 30/40 35% Poor Poor X Roots deflected from an earlier curb line. Recently topped.
103 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.8 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 30/20 30/35 35% Poor Poor X X Topped. Trunk buffer, and irrigate "where possible".
104 18.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/30 40/35 38% Poor Poor X Roots deflected from an earlier curb line. Recently topped.

Trunk buffer, and irrigate "where
possible".
105 X X 14.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.8 Raywood ash
Fraxinus
'Raywood' 40/25 30/30 30% Poor Poor X Graft incompatibility. Raywood ash decline syndrome.
106 X X 17.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.7 X Raywood ash
Fraxinus
'Raywood' 25/25 15/15 15% Very Poor Very
Poor
Graft incompatibility. Raywood ash
decline syndrome.

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 9 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
107 X X 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.9 Raywood ash
Fraxinus
'Raywood' 20/20 15/15 15% Very Poor Very
Poor North North X Graft incompatibility. Raywood ash
decline syndrome.
108 X X 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 Raywood ash
Fraxinus
'Raywood' 25/25 20/20 20% Very Poor North North X Raywood ash decline syndrome. 109 X 21.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.4 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/30 45/38 42% Poor Poor to
Mod East X GR X Anthracnose infection. Topped.
110 X 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.6 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 30/25 40/35 37% Poor Poor X GR X Recently topped. 111 X 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 30/20 35/38 37% Poor Poor East X X Recently topped. 112 X 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 30/25 40/45 44% Poor Poor to
Mod East X X Recently topped.
113 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/30 30/25 28% Very Poor Poor X Zero to 7 feet. X Recently topped. Lower trunk
decayed.

Trunk buffer, and irrigate "where
possible".
114 n/a
Tree has been
removed as of
2022.

11.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/10 10/10 10% Very Poor Very
Poor
Zero to
8 feet. At 3 feet. Severe lower trunk decay.
115 n/a
Tree has been
removed as of
2022.

11.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.0 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 18/3 10/10 10% Very Poor Very
Poor
Zero to
8 feet. Severe lower trunk decay.
116 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.3 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 43/40 55/40 47% Poor Mod South X GR X Roots are destroying the existing parking lot curb and asphalt work.

Trunk buffer, and irrigate "where
possible".
117 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4 London plane
cultivar
Platanus x
acerifolia Cult. 50/18 75/75 75% Good Mod South
Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
118 X 13.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.9 London plane
cultivar
Platanus x
acerifolia Cult. 50/30 80/80 80% Good Mod South
119 X 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 London plane
cultivar
Platanus x
acerifolia Cult. 50/30 80/75 77% Good Mod South South
Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 10 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
120 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 Japanese maple
cultivar
Acer palmatum
Cult. 20/15 70/70 70% Good Mod Northe
ast
North
east
Needs additional irrigation
frequency and/or duration to
increase soil moisture year round.

However, avoid pooling of
irrigaiton and maintain fast
drainage to keep tree from
succumbing to
Verticillium wilt
fungus.

Chain link fence or trunk buffer,
and maintain all current
irrigation at a higher volume of
output than the existing
frequency/duration. If water
supply is shut off, use hand-
watering 3x/week.
121 T 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.6 swamp myrtle
Tristaniopsis
laurina 20/12 75/50 60% Fair Mod North North Tree has been liontailed (poor pruning practice). TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED.
122 T 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 swamp myrtle
Tristaniopsis
laurina 25/12 80/60 70% Good Mod West West Tree has been liontailed (poor pruning practice). TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED.
123 X 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/20 45/40 42% Poor Poor North North
east X Note flux on trunk at 5 feet
elevation.
124 X (?) 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 22/15 60/30 37% Poor Poor to
Mod North North X Severe angle of lean off from
vertical.
125 11.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 28/28 40/40 40% Poor Poor X Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Trunk buffer wrap will be used
to protect lower trunk. Also use
a hand-watering irrigation
regime.
126 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/30 50/45 47% Poor Poor to
Mod East East X At 5 feet. Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Trunk buffer wrap will be used
to protect lower trunk. Also use
a hand-watering irrigation
regime.
127 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.2 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/20 45/45 45% Poor Poor X
Inclusion
forming at 5
feet.

Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Trunk buffer wrap will be used
to protect lower trunk. Also use
a hand-watering irrigation
regime.
128 8.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/23 50/50 50% Fair Poor to
Mod East X Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Trunk buffer wrap will be used
to protect lower trunk. Also use
a hand-watering irrigation
regime.
129 X 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/23 55/55 55% Fair Poor to
Mod X Liontailed (poor pruning practice).
130 X 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 23/20 55/53 54% Fair Poor to
Mod X
Inclusion
forming at 5
feet.

Liontailed (poor pruning practice).
131 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 23/23 55/50 50% Fair Poor to
Mod East East X
Inclusion
forming at 5
feet.

Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Trunk buffer and chain link
fence panels. Heavy irrigation
during construction.
132 X 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/20 50/50 50% Fair Poor to
Mod X Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 11 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
133 X 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 25/20 55/55 55% Fair Mod East X
Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Girdling roots and/or bulbous
growth at north side of root crown.
134 X 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.7 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 23/23 55/45 50% Fair Mod East X
Bark
inclusion
forming at 5
feet.

Liontailed (poor pruning practice).
135 X 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 22/25 55/45 50% Fair Mod X Liontailed (poor pruning practice). 136 X X 11.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.4 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 22/16 25/25 25% Very Poor Poor West X GR? Liontailed (poor pruning practice).

Bulbous growth or girdling roots on
west side causing lean to west.
137 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 camphor tree
Cinnamomum
camphora 25/30 60/45 53% Fair Mod Was liontail pruned. Trunk buffer wrap, and use hand watering irrigation regime.
138 X X 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.4 flowering pear
cultivar
Pyrus calleryana
Cult. 22/5 25/25 25% Very Poor Very
Poor
Tree is infected with fireblight
bacteria. Remove tree and replant
with another tree species that is
resistant to fireblight.
139 X 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 flowering pear
cultivar
Pyrus calleryana
Cult. 30/9 30/30 30% Poor Poor At 7 feet.

Tree is infected with fireblight
bacteria. Remove tree and replant
with another tree species that is
resistant to fireblight.

Chain link fence protection
"where possible", trunk buffer
wrap, and use hand watering
irrigation regime.
140 X 5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.8 flowering pear
cultivar
Pyrus calleryana
Cult. 35/9 50/40 44% Poor Mod At 10 feet.

Tree is infected with fireblight
bacteria. Remove tree and replant
with another tree species that is
resistant to fireblight.

Chain link fence protection
"where possible", trunk buffer
wrap, and use hand watering
irrigation regime.
141 X 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.4 Robinia or Cassia
species.

Robinia or Cassia sp. 33/20 80/50 59% Fair Good West South X 142 X 24.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.3 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 55/55 50/40 40% Poor Mod GR 15 feet. X
143 X 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 60/30 50/40 44% Poor Mod GR 11 feet X
144 X 15.0 ` 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 35/20 70/50 60% Fair Mod X
145 X 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 40/30 75/60 66% Fair Mod South X
Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 12 of 14

3 08.15.2022
Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
146 X 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.2 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/28 70/55 57% Fair Mod X
147 X 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/35 55/35 55% Fair Poor to
Mod XX
148 X 19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 65/30 60/35 43% Poor Mod GR X
149 X X 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 60/40 60/20 26% Very Poor Poor to
Mod West GR X
150 X 23.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 55/30 55/40 44% Poor Mod East GR 12 feet. 151 X 23.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.8 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/35 75/50 59% Fair Mod South South X Root system asymetrical. 152 X 18.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.6 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 45/30 65/55 59% Fair Mod GR X
153 X 20.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.8 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/35 75/65 73% Good Mod X
154 X 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.1 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 50/25 65/60 60% Fair Mod South South X
155 X 28.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.2 X Shamel ash
Fraxinus uhdei 60/40 75/50 59% Fair Mod GR X
156 X 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 60/25 75/70 74% Good Mod ?
157 X 25.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.8 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 60/25 65/70 68% Fair Poor to
Mod
Tree is experiencing soil moisture
deficit, and would perform better if
regular heavy irrigation were
provided to the open soil root
system.
158 X 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 60/25 75/65 71% Good Mod
Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 13 of 14 Tree Data
Survey Date: 6/19/2018 (Tree Disposition Revised 2/5/2023) 189 N. Bernardo Drive
Mountain View, California

15.3" Dia. All Other
Species, at 54"
Above Grade)
Common Name Scientific Name
(Genus, species )
Height and Canopy
Spread (ft.)
Health & Structural
Ratings

(Note Height)
Root Extension
Restricted in Planter
Roots Damaged On
Grade by Mowing
Notes Tree Protection Measures
(Preliminary)
159 X 28.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.5 X coast redwood
Sequoia
sempervirens 65/28 80/75 78% Good Mod to
Good
160 X 11.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 purple leaf plum
cultivar
Prunus
cerasifera Cult. 20/15 50/50 50% Fair Poor to
Mod
NOTES:

1. Tree stem diameters measured with a forester's D-tape which converts actual circumference to averaged diameter in tenths of inches.

2. Tree heights were measured using a Nikon 550 Forestry Pro hypsometer. Tree canopy spread was visually estimated.

3. Many of the trees at this site, such as the shamel ash trees along the north perimeter, and the purple leaf plums at the grass courtyard area were overpruned by tree care personnel who were either poorly trained, or under direction to perform work that is not in compliance with United States national pruning standards (ANSI A- 300 standards for tree care operations/woody plant maintenance/pruning). Many of the ash trees were top pruned, and many of the plums have been "lion-tailed" to remove inner and lower elevation live wood and foliage, resulting in permanent disfigurement to the trees, and will likely cause long-term problems over the remaining lifespans of the trees, such as over-extension of limbs, and loss of "damping" capability by the trees due to lack of inner and lower branches. Trees that have been top pruned usually develop weakly attached stems that are at increased risk of splitout. Trees that have been liontailed are at increased risk of limb and branch and total tree failure due to the loss of the "damping" ability of the tree to sway around and cancel out storm wind forces.

4. Many of the shamel ash along the north perimeter of the site are constricted in terms of normal root extension radiating outward from the trunks. The result has been that roots are circling and deformed, and lack normal bicycle spoke patterns that would typically help anchor the tree. The older curb and asphalt sections of the parking lot are in some cases cracked and displaced due to the shamel ash root and mainstem expansion processes, and will continue to sustain damages for the lives of the trees. Also note that because tree roots typically extend 3x to 5x the canopy dripline radius, we can expect that many of site trees may have extended their lateral woody roots out and under the older asphalt parking lot, coursing their way through the older baserock of the parking lot that is likely compacted to a lesser degree than would be a modern engineered system.

Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist / Cell (415) 203-0990 / [email protected] 14 of 14 4 08.15.2022

ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 / ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified / ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Cell: (415) 203-0990 / Email: [email protected] 32 of 51
Site Address: 189 N. Bernardo, Mountain View, CA Version: 2/5/2023

10. Chain Link Root Protection Zone Fencing:

Fencing protection shall be established prior to arrival of any site plan construction or demolition equipment on site.

The protective fencing shall be termed “Root Protection Zone” f encing or “RPZ”, and marked with appropri ate signage indicating that the fencing shall not be moved or removed without written authorization fro m the PA (project arborist).

Fencing material shall be chain link steel, minimum 5 feet in h eight, hung on two-inch diameter iron tube posts pounded 24-inches into the ground at a spacing of no greater than 8 feet on-center.

Alternative Method / Chain Link Panels:

Wire chain link panels together using steel bailing wire, or us e moveable concrete fence panel footings, to set the panels in place as fu ll perimeters. Affix the panels in place such that they cannot be moved, by pounding rebar into the soil at the corners of each fence panel and wiring those bars to the fence corners.
(see image at right).

FENCE LOCATIONS:

SEE WLCA TREE MAP MARKUP IN SECTION 10.0 OF THIS REPORT FOR THE

ROUGH LOCATIONS OF PROTECTION FENCING NOTED AS HEAVY RED

DASHED LINES IN FULL PERIMET ERS SURROUNDING TREES BEING RETAINED.

Images at right show both the pounded iron tube post method, an d also the alternative “chain link panel method”.

ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 / ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified / ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Cell: (415) 203-0990 / Email: [email protected] 49 of 51
Site Address: 189 N. Bernardo, Mountain View, CA Version: 2/5/2023

10.0 Tree Location and Protection Map Markup (Revised 2/5/2023)

WLCA marked up TGP tree disposition plan sheet L8.0 version Feb, 2023 as the basis for the tree protection map.

Note that the proposed walking paths have been completely reconfigured by TGP since the initial submittal in 2020. The proposed new walking path along Central Expressway will now require removal of a large number of heritage size coast redwood tree specimens that were originally to be preserved and protected as an evergreen screen along the south side of the proposed parking garage. Similarly, the redwood specimens lining the Central Expressway side of the existing building will now in many cases be required to be removed, which will result in the loss of a dense evergreen screen on that south side.

The result of this loss in evergreen tree screening will be significant year-round heat gain for the 189 N. Bernardo building.

As of Feb, 2023, the new landscape plan also involves construction of only the bike/ped pathway along Central Expressway. The formerly-required pathway that was to be built in an east-west orientation along the north perimeter parking lot has now been eliminated from the plans.

 Red dashed lines on the WLCA tr ee map markup indicate “best fit” chain link root protection zone fence routing, along non-optimal routes. The routing shown is the widest offset radius available, given the current plan layout as shown on the applicant’s submittal set of plan sheets.

 Yellow circles indicate trees t hat WLCA suggests for fitting with trunk buffer wraps as above-ground protection for the mainstem bark and xylem wood tissues.

ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist #401 / ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified / ISA Certified Arborist #WE-3172A Cell: (415) 203-0990 / Email: [email protected] 50 of 51
Site Address: 189 N. Bernardo, Mountain View, CA Version: 2/5/2023

Mountain View City CouncilMay 23, 2023

Mountain View City Council
May 23, 2023