Cities Index.
ATT 2 - Project Chronology

Mountain View City Council
April 9, 2024

Document
ATT 2 - Project Chronology
Meeting
April 9, 2024
Body
Mountain View City Council
Original file
157 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

R3 Zoning District Update Project Chronology
O
ctober 29, 2019 – City Council Mee�ng
Op�ons for responding to displacement study session
N
ovember 12, 2019 - City Council Mee�ng
• Approve project scope of work
• Approve Op�cos Design, Inc. contract
S
eptember 22, 2020 – City Council Mee�ng
Displacement Response Strategy update
O
ctober 13, 2020 - City Council Mee�ng
Present key ini�al findings and receive Council direc�on on next steps. Council comments included the following (note that comments do not necessarily represent majority):
• Exis�ng R3 standards do not meet community goals; many R3 projects exhibit a lot of “sameness”;
• R3 standards should focus on form and neighborhood fit and less on floor area ra�o (FAR) and density limits;
• Need to look at mi�ga�ng parking impacts from new R3 development; • Look at new tree canopy standards; also, preserve exis�ng tree canopies in R3 neighborhoods;
• Public space is lacking with newer R3 development; focus on providing a more pleasant public/pedestrian experience;
• Adding more units in R3 is important;
• Larger units for families are lacking in R3; consider encouraging or requiring a minimum threshold for the amount of larger units in new development; • Address usable, common open space that is public, efficient, and usable by residents;
• Consider maximizing density and incen�vizing new development; new rowhouse development reduces opportuni�es for new stacked flat/higher-density development;
Attachment 2
• Quality of life in R3 is very important; consider any addi�onal infrastructure that is needed;
• R3 project is needed to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) alloca�on;
• New R3 standards should increase densi�es;
• Consider priori�zing R3 “subareas” that require seismic retrofits; • Focus on “the look and feel” and character of buildings and making great neighborhoods;
• Do not incen�ve “look-alike” buildings; address architectural variety and interest; • Consider R3 changes that increase densi�es near transit; focus on proximity to services, bikeways, etc.
• Concern over poten�al large increase of new units and impact to community and infrastructure, including poten�al school impacts; and
• Strategies are needed for new R3 development that displaces residents.

October 26, 2020 - Community Mee�ng #1

November 16, 2020 - Community Mee�ng #2

March 17, 2021 – Environmental Planning Commission Mee�ng April 13, 2021 - City Council Mee�ng
Provide direc�on on Dra� standards, materials and concepts. City Council comments included the following (note that comments do not necessarily represent majority):
• Resolve displacement issue first
• More outreach needed
• General support for zones
o Some CC members (2) concerned about R3 impact/influence on General Plan o Concern over R3-D
o Concern over some geographic areas/equity
o Concern over R3/R4 issues
• Concern about walkability/streetscape/landscaping
• Support for diversity of housing types
• Most ok with approach for addressing overlay zones, but bring back op�ons • Need to address issues of ameni�es (parks, retail, etc)

Summer 2022 – Neighborhood Workshops

April 11, 2023 – City Council Mee�ng
Housing Element Adop�on

October 10, 2023 – City Council Mee�ng
Displacement Response Strategy – local replacement requirements

December 11, 2023 – Tenants’ Workshop

← All documents from this meeting