Cities Index.
ATT 2 - Vesting Tentative Map Resolution

Mountain View City Council
January 28, 2025

Document
ATT 2 - Vesting Tentative Map Resolution
Meeting
January 28, 2025
Body
Mountain View City Council
Original file
1.1 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on legistar1.granicus.com. That file is the official record.

Attachment 2
MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-25r-1 Page 1

CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESOLUTION NO.

SERIES 2024

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW

CONDITIONALLY APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE MAP TO CREATE FIVE LOTS AND ONE COMMON LOT ON A 0.51-ACRE LOT AT 198 EASY STREET

WHEREAS, on January 22, 2024 , Pho Phan of Phan Architects ( “Applicant”) submitted an application (Application No. PL -2024-018) for a Planned Unit Development Permit, Special Development Permit, and Development Review Permit to construct a five-unit rowhouse project, and a Heritage Tree Removal Permit to remove e ight Heritage trees on a 0. 51-acre project site located at 198 Easy Street (project site); and

WHEREAS, on the same date , the Applicant submitted an application (Application No. PL-2024-019) for a Vesting Tentative Map to create five lots and one common lot for rowhouse purposes at the project site; and

WHEREAS, the subject property has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Medium- Density Residential; and

WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R3 -3/sd (Multiple -Family Residential/Special Design) Zoning District; and

WHEREAS, the General Plan sets a goal for an expanded and enhanced park and open space system to meet current City needs for parks and open space based on population growth arising from new residential development. New residential subdivisions have a significant impact on the use and availability of park and recreation space and facilities; and

WHEREAS, this project includes a new residential subdivision and , therefore, is subject to the City’s Park Land Dedication Ordinance (Chapter 41 of the City Code ), which requires dedication of park land in the amount of 3 .0 acres per 1,000 residents or payment of an in -lieu fee; and

WHEREAS, a park land dedication or payment of a Park Land Dedication In-Lieu Fee is critical to provide needed park facilities for the occupants of this project because it is located in the Whisman Planning Area identified in the 2014 Parks and Open Space Plan, which is an area having a deficiency of 7.44 acres of park land for existing residents of the area based on the General Plan standard of 3.0 acres of park land per 1,000 residents. The Whisman Planning Area is currently developed with 18.44 acres of park land where 25.88 acres of park land are required to serve the current population. Therefore, there currently are not adequate park land facilities available for occupants of this project, and additional park facilities are necessary; and MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 Page 2 10444v3

WHEREAS, on December 18, 2024, the Subdivision Committee and the Zoning Administrator conducted a duly noticed joint public hearing and recommended the City Council conditionally approve a Vesting Tentative Map for the project site , subject to the attached findings and conditions of approval, and a related Planned Unit Development, Special Design Permit, Development Review Permit, and Heritage Tree Removal Permit; and

WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on January 28, 2025 on said application and received and considered all evidence presented at said hearing, including the recommendation from the Subdivision Committee and Zoning Administrator, the City Council report, and project materials, and determined that the Vesting Tentative Map is consistent with the applicable zoning and subdivision requirements in the General Plan and the City Code; and

WHEREAS, on that same date, the City Council adopted a companion r esolution conditionally approving a Planned Unit Development Permit, Development Review Permit, Special Design Permit , and Heritage Tree Removal Permit and finding the project exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332; and

WHEREAS, subdivision of the property will facilitate the development of the project site consistent with applicable provisions of the General Plan; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED: that, based on substantial evidence in the record, the City Council of the City of Mountain View finds the project to be categorically exempt from review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (“In -Fill Development”) as described in further detail below; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED: that the City Council hereby makes the following findings regarding the Vesting Tentative Map (Application No. PL-2024-019) per City Code Section 36.44.70:

A. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with applicable general and specific plans. (Gov. Code §§ 66473.5, 66474) .

The subdivision is compatible with General Plan policies—specifically, the project supports the General Plan Policies LUD 3.5 (Diversity) and LUD 6.1 (Neighborhood Character). The subdivision provides for the improvement of the 0.51 acre with frontage improvements, including new utility connections, new landscaping, and new curb, gutter, and sidewalks;

B. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development. (Gov. Code § 66474). The site is zoned to allow multi -family residential development and is a relatively flat with access, utility, and site amenities suitable for residential development;

C. The proposed design of the subdivision and the improvements, as conditioned, will not cause environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. (Gov. Code § 66474) The design of the subdivision and the proposed MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 Page 3 10444v3
improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitats as the project site complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a categorically exempt proje ct under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (“In-Fill Development”) because the project is consistent with the following findings, and none of the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply:

1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The proposed project is in substantial compliance with the intent of requirements of the applicable zoning district, and implementation of the proposed harmonious and integrated Planned Unit Development design is superior to standard development in the underlying zone and, therefore, justifies the exceptions to the requirements bec ause the project complies with the Rowhouse Guidelines, which facilitates rowhouse projects with shared common open space and access and is designed with an attractive architectural style, which includes appropriate articulation and architectural treatments, such as porches, balconies, window shutters, and varied exterior materials, such as wood-type horizontal siding and stucco.

2. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses . The gross project site is approximately 0.51 acre in size and is located on the west side of Easy Street, between the State Route 85 on -ramp and Gladys Court, within the central portion of the City of Mountain View. The site is located within an urbanized, developed, residential area of the City and is surrounded by existing residential uses. Therefore, the propos ed project would meet this criterion.

3. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.

The project site is developed with existing residential use and is located within a developed, urban area of the City. The site does not contain habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.

No species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species are known to occur at the site location, and no sensitive or jurisdictional habitats are present at or adjacent to the site. The site is not part of any habitat conservation plan. Therefore, the project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, and the project would meet this criterion under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332(c).

4. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

Traffic/Transportation: As the project is residential, it would not exceed the City’s transportation impact thresholds. According to the City of Mountain View’s Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) policy, residential projects located in areas of low VMT, defined as exhibiting VMT that is 15% or greater below the existing nine -county Bay Area MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 Page 4 10444v3
regional average VMT, shall be presumed to have a less -than-significant transportation impact. The project site is located in a low -VMT area and, therefore, the project would not result in significant transportation impacts.

Noise: The project would not exceed the City’s applicable significance thresholds related to noise or vibration. The project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or a public airport and would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive aircraft noise levels.

The project would result in construction noise and vibration at levels similar to other midrise construction projects within the City. There is nothing unique or peculiar about the project or its construction that would suggest that the project would have greater construction noise or vibration impacts than other typical midrise construction projects.

The project would include stationary sources of operational noise, such as mechanical heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment, that is standardized for noise reduction as well as an emergency generator for the elevator. Stationary equipment would be located and shielded to operate within the City’s Noise Ordinance requirements. As directed by the California Supreme Court in Make UC A Good Neighbor v. Regents of University of California (2024) 16 Cal.5th 43, noise from resident activity at the site is not considered an environmental impact.

Based on the above discussion, the project would not result in significant or unique noise impacts. With implementation of all required standard conditions of approval pertaining to noise (see Section 5.0, CEQA Checklist, for full text of applicable conditions), the project would not result in significant effects related to noise or vibration. For these reasons, the project would meet the criteria pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332(d).

Air Quality: The project would not exceed the City’s applicable significance thresholds related to air quality. The project is consistent with the policies and standards of the City’s General Plan and proposes infill residential development within an area that is well served by transit. As such, the project is also considered to be consistent with the Clean Air Plan.

T
he project would not exceed the screening criteria published by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) air quality emissions resulting from construction or operations. Construction
-r
elated emissions from the project will be
reduced to a le ss-than-significant level with implementation of required City of Mountain View standard conditions of approval. Given the nature of the proposed residential use, project operations would not be a substantial source of toxic air contaminants and would not pose a health risk to others. Pursuant to the City of Mountain View’s standard conditions of approval, the project will be required to MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 Page 5 10444v3
install MERV 13 or better HVAC air filters which will remove emissions from indoor air and ensure that the project will not result in significant health risks.

With implementation of the City’s standard conditions of approval, the project would not result in significant effects related to air quality and would meet the criteria pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332(d).

Water Quality : The project would not exceed the City’s applicable significance thresholds related to water quality. The project site is currently developed and is located within an urbanized environment. There are no lakes, creeks, or other surface waters in the immediate site vicinity. The project site is served by the City’s existing stormwater system and downstream conveyance channels that will receive runoff from the project.

Given the location and flat nature of the site, the project would not substantially increase runoff as a source of polluted runoff from the site. The project will be subject to regulatory requirements and the City’s standard conditions of approval, which require site design measures to reduce the amount of stormwater runoff and limit pollution in stormwater runoff. With implementation of all required standard conditions pertaining to water, the project would not result in significant impacts related to w ater quality and would meet the criteria pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332(d) for an infill exemption.

5. T
he site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services . The project site is located within an urbanized residential area of the City, which is served by all needed utilities (e.g., water, electricity, sanitary sewer facilities, and storm drain facilities) and all required public services (e.g., police and fire services, public schools).

The proposed redevelopment will require specific on
-s
ite extensions and
improvements to existing utility infrastructure to serve the new residential rowhouse buildings. The project would not result in significant effects rela ted to utilities or public services and would meet the criteria pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332(d) for an infill exemption.

D. T
he design of the subdivision and its improvements will not cause serious public health problems. (Gov. Code § 66474) The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the project will be consistent with the policies included in the General Plan and the City Code and will be subject to standard conditions of approval to protect public health, safety, convenience, and welfare. Proposed public (off-site) improvements are designed to meet applicable City design standards and the City Code. Additionally, the project will be further reviewed for compliance with Building and Fire Codes to ensure on -site improvements comply with applicable codes for safe habitation;

MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 Page 6 10444v3
E. The design of the subdivision and its improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public -at-large, for access through or use of property within the subdivision. (Gov. Code § 66474) The subdivision and improvements as conditioned will not conflict with existing easements that will remain on the subject site;

F. For a proposed subdivision with more than five hundred (500) dwelling units, water will be available and sufficient to serve the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 66473.7 of the Subdivision Map Act. (Gov. Code § 66473.7) This finding does not apply because the project proposes five (5) dwelling units , which is less than five hundred (500) dwelling units;

G. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the sewer system will not violate regional water quality control regulations. (Gov. Code § 66474.6) The subdivision will not result in the discharge of waste into the sewer system that would violate regional water quality control regulations;

H. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. (Gov. Code § 66473.1) The subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities.

I. The City has considered the effects on housing needs of the region in which the local jurisdiction is situated and balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. (Gov. Code § 66412.3) In approving the vesting tentative map, the City Council has considered its effect upon the housing needs of the region balanced with the public service needs of Mountain View residents and available fiscal and environmental resources; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED: that the City Council hereby finds the Vesting Tentative Map to be consistent with the applicable zoning and subdivision requirements in the General Plan and the City Code; and be it

FURTHER RESOLVED: that the City Council hereby approves the Vesting Tentative Map (Application No. PL -2024-019), based on the findings above and subject to the subdivider’s compliance with and fulfillment of all of the conditions of approval, which are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference as though set forth fully herein.

TIME FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW.

The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, as established by Resolution No. 13850, adopted by the City Council on August 9, 1983.

NOTICE. The conditions of project approval set forth herein include certain fees and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), these conditions constitute MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 Page 7 10444v3
written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees and a description of the dedications, reservations, and exactions. The applicant is hereby further notified that the 90 -day appeal period, in which the applicant may protest these fees and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If the applicant fails to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all requirements of S ection 66020, the applicant will be legally barred from later challenging such fees or exactions.
– – – – – – – – – – –
MN
/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1
E
xhibits: A. Subdivision Conditions of Approval
B. Vesting Tentative Map
Exhibit A
MN/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 1 of 6

SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS
APPLICATION NO.: PL-2024-019
198 EASY STREET

FINAL MAP

1. MAP SUBMITTAL: File a final map for approval and recordation in accordance with the City Code and the California Subdivision Map Act prior to the issuance of any building permit for the property(ies) within the subdivision. All existing and proposed easements are to b e shown on the map. Submit the map for review concurrent with all items on the Map Checklist and the Off-Site Improvement Plans to the Public Works Department. All required materials shall be submitted electronically (i.e., flattened, reduced-size PDFs).

2. PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT: At first submittal of a final map to the Public Works Department, the applicant shall provide a current preliminary title report indicating the exact name of the current legal owners of the property, their type of ownersh ip (
individual, partnership, corporation, etc.), and legal description of the property involved (dated within six months of the submission). The title report shall include all easements and agreements referenced in the title report. Depending upon the type of ownership, additional information may be required. The applicant shall provide an updated title report to the Public Works Department upon request. All required materials shall be submitted electronically (i.e., flattened, reduced -size PDFs).

3. SOILS REPORT: Soils and geotechnical reports prepared for the subdivision shall be indicated on a final map. Submit a copy of the report with the first submittal of a final map. All required materials shall be submitted electronically (i.e., flattene d, reduced-size PDFs).

As required by the State Seismic Hazards Mapping Act, a project site -specific geotechnical investigation shall be conducted by a registered soils/geologist identifying any seismic hazards and recommending mitigation measures to be taken by the project.

Th
e applicant, through the applicant’s registered soils engineer/geologist, shall certify the project complies with the requirements of the State Seismic Hazards Mapping Act. Indicate the location (page number) within the geotechnical report of where this certification is located or provide a separate letter stating such.

4. MAP DOCUMENTS: Prior to the approval and recordation of the map, submit a subdivision guarantee, Santa Clara County Tax Collector’s letter regarding unpaid taxes or assessments, and subdivision security if there are unpaid taxes or special assessments. All required materials shall be submitted electronically (i.e., flattened, reduced-size PDFs).

5. FINAL MAP APPROVAL: A final map shall be signed and notarized by the owner and engineer/surveyor and submitted with an

8.5”x11” reduction of the map and a PDF to the Public Works Department. In order to place the approval of a final map on the public hearing agenda for the City Council, all related materials and agreements must be completed, signed, and receive d by
t
he Public Works Department 40 calendar days prior to the Council meeting date. After City Council approval, the City Engineer will sign the map. The applicant’s title company shall have the Santa Clara County Recorder’s Office record the original and shall provide a Xerox Mylar copy of the map to be endorsed by the Santa Clara County Recorder’s Office. The endorsed Xerox Mylar copy and a PDF shall be returned within one week after recording the map to the Public Works Department.

RIGHTS-OF-WAY

6. STREET DEDICATION: Dedicate a public street in fee on the face of the map, as required by the Public Works Director, to complete the existing cul-de-sac as shown on the preliminary final map.

7. FRONTAGE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DEDICATION: Dedicate a 10’ wide public utility easement (PUE) along project street frontage(s) on the face of the map for such use as sanitary sewer, water, storm drains, and other public utilities, including gas, electric, communication, and cable television facilities, as r equired by the Public Works Director. Utility boxes and vaults are not allowed to encroach into the public sidewalk and must fit either entirely within the landscape strip or within the PUE. The property owner or homeowners association shall maintain the surface improvements over the easement and must not modify or obstruct the easement area in a manner contrary to the intent of the easement. The dedication statement shall specify the PUE shall be kept free and clear of buildings and other permanent stru ctures/facilities, including, but not limited to, the M
N/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 2 of 6
following: garages, sheds, carports, and storage structures; balconies and porches; retaining walls; C.3 bioretention systems ; and private utility lines running longitudinally within the PUE.

8. PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT: Dedicate a public service easement (PSE) on the face of the map to the utility companies for th e proposed electric, gas, and telecommunication conduits and vaults serving the project.

9. PRIVATE UTILITY AND ACCESS EASEMENTS: Dedicate private utility and/or access easements on the face of the map, as necessary, for the common private street and utility improvements.

10. UTILITY EASEMENT AND APPROVALS: Dedicate utility easements, as required by the utility companies and as approved by the Public Works Director. All street and public service easement dedications are to be shown on a final map. The subdivider shall submit two copies of the map to PG&E, AT&T (SBC), and Comcast for their review and determination of easement needs. Th e publ
ic service easement dedications must be approved by the utility companies prior to the approval of a final map.

11. STORM DRAIN EASEMENT: The subdivider shall provide a private, irrevocable storm drain easement over Lots 1 through 5 and the common lot in favor of Lots 1 through 5.

ASSESSMENTS, FEES, AND PARK LAND

12. SUBDIVISION FEES: Pay all subdivision fees due in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of payment prior to the approval of a final map.

13. MAP PLAN CHECK FEE: Prior to issuance of any building permits OR prior to approval of a final map, as applicable, the applicant shall pay the map plan check fee in accordance with Sections 28.27.b and 28.19.b of the City Code per the rates in effect at time of payment. The map plan check fee shall be paid at the time of initial map plan check submittal per the adopted fee in effect at time of payment.

14. PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION FEE: Prior to issuance of any building permits or prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall pay the plan check and inspection fee in accordance with Sections 27.60 and 28.36 of the City Code per the adopted rates in effect at time of payment.

A
n initial plan check fee based on the Public Works adopted fee schedule shall be paid at the time of initial improvement pla n check submittal based on the initial cost estimate for constructing street improvements and other public facilities; public a nd private utilities and structures located within the public right -of-way; and utility, grading, and driveway improvements for common green and townhouse-type condominiums. Once the plans have been approved, the approved cost estimate will be used to determine the final bond amounts, plan check fees, and inspection fees. Any paid initial plan check fee will be deducted from the approved final plan check fee.

15. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE: Prior to issuance of any building permits OR prior to approval of the final map, as applicable, the applicant shall pay the transportation impact fee for the development. Residential category fees are based on the number of units. Retail, Service, Office, R&D, and Industrial category fees are based on the square footage of the development. Credit is given for the existing site use(s), as applicable.

16. PARK LAND DEDICATION FEE: Prior to issuance of any building permits or prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall pay the Park Land Dedication Fee of $193,200, n accordance with Chapter 41 of the City Code. No credit against the Park Land Dedication Fee is allowed for private open space and recreational facilities. (PROJECT- SPECIFIC CONDITION)

17. STORM DRAINAGE FEE: Prior to issuance of any building permits and prior to approval of a final map, the applicant shall pay the off-site storm drainage fee per Section 28.51(b) and with the rates in effect at time of payment.

M
N/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 3 of 6

STREET IMPROVEMENTS

18. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COMMON IMPROVEMENTS: Install or reconstruct standard public and private common improvements required for the subdivision and as required by Chapters 27 and 28 of the City Code. The public improvements include, but are no
t limited to, new detached sidewalk, curb, and gutter; street signs per City Standards, two (2) ADA curb ramps, (2) driveways, installation of three (3) City standard light poles, full street overlay on Gladys Court, half street easement on Easy Street , and t
he undergrounding of overhead electric. The private common improvements include, but are not limited to, private storm drain connection, joint trench connection, and common driveway. a. I
mprovement Agreement: Prior to the approval of a final map, the property owner must sign a Public Works Department improvement agreement for the installation of the public and on- site common improvements. b. B
onds/Securities: Prior to the approval of a final map, the property owner must sign a Public Works Department faithful performance bond (100%) and materials/labor bond (100%) or provide a letter of credit (150%) or cash security (100%) securing the installation and warranty of the off-site and on-site common improvements in a form approved by the City A
ttorney’s Office. The surety (bond company) must be listed as an acceptable surety on the most current Department of the Treasury’s Listing of Approved Sureties on Federal Bonds, Department Circular 570. This list of approved sureties is available through the internet at: www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/suretyBnd/c570_a-z.htm. The bond amount must be below the underwriting limitation amount listed on the Department of the Treasury’s Listing of Approved Sureties. The surety must be licensed to do business in California. Guidelines for security are available at the Public Works Department.
c. Insurance: Prior to the approval of a final map, the property owner must provide a Certificate of Insurance and endorsements for the Commercial General Liability and Automobile Liability naming the City as an additional insured from the entity that will sign the im provement agreement. The insurance coverage amounts are a minimum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) Commercial General Liability, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Automobile Liability, One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Contractor’s Pollution
Liability, and One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) Workers’ Compensation. The insurance requirements are available from the Public Works Department.

19. INFRASTRUCTURE QUANTITIES: Upon submittal of the initial building permit and improvement plans, submit a completed construction cost estimate form indicating the quantities of the street and utility improvements with the submittal of the improvement plans. The construction cost estimate is used to estimate the cost of improvements and to determine the Public Works plan check and inspection fees. The construction cost estimate is to be prepared by the civil engineer preparing the improvement plans.

20. OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Prepare off-site public improvement plans in accordance with Chapter 28 of the City Code, the City’s Standard Design Criteria, Submittal Checklist, Plan Review Checklist, and the conditions of approval of the projec t.

T
he plans are to be drawn on 24”x36 ” sheets at a minimum scale of 1” = 20’. The plans shall be stamped by a California - registered civil engineer and shall show all public improvements and other applicable work within the public right -of-way.

T
raffic control plans for each phase of construction shall be prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the Californi a M
anual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) and shall show, at a minimum, work areas, delineators, signs, and other traffic-control measures required for work that impacts traffic on existing streets. Construction management plans: Locations of on-site parking for construction equipment and construction workers and on-site material storage areas must be submitted for review and approval and shall be incorporated into the off-site improvement plans and identified as “For Reference Only.” O
ff-site improvement plans, an initial plan check fee, and map plan check fee based on the Public Works fee schedule, Improvement Plan Checklist, and items noted within the Checklist must be submitted together as a separate packag e c
oncurrent with the first submittal of the building plans and a final map. All required materials shall be submitted electronically (i.e., flattened, reduced-size PDFs).

The off-site plans must be approved and signed by the Public Works Department. After the plans have been signed by the Public Works Department, two full -size and two half -size black-line sets, one PDF of the signed/stamped plan set, and a USD M
N/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 4 of 6
flash drive with CAD file and PDF must be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the approval of a final map. CAD files shall meet the City’s Digital Data Submission Standards.

21. PRIVATE COMMON IMPROVEMENT PLANS: Prepare on-site common improvement plans consisting of the proposed demolition, fill, grading, retaining walls, drainage, private streets, common driveways, common utilities, public utilities, an d o
ther applicable improvements in accordance with Chapter 28 of the City Code, the Standard Design Criteria for Commo n G
reen and Townhouse-Type Condominiums, and the conditions of approval of the subdivision. The plans are to be drawn o n 24”
x36” sheets at a minimum scale of 1” = 20’. The plans shall be stamped by a Cali fornia-registered civil engineer. Where both public and common improvement plans are required, the plans shall be combined into one set of plans.

T
he improvement plans, Improvement Plan Checklist, and items noted within the Checklist must be submitted together as a separate package concurrent with the first submittal of the building plans and a final map. All required materials shall be submitted electronically (i.e., flattened, reduced-size PDFs).

T
he improvement plans must be approved and signed by the Public Works Department. After the improvement plans have been signed by the Public Works Department, one full -size and one half -size black-line sets, one PDF of the signed/stamped plan set, and a USB flash drive with CAD file and PDF must be submitted to the Public Works Department prior to the approval of a final map. CAD files shall meet the City’s Digital Data Submission Standards.

UTILITIES

22. ON-SITE UTILITY MAINTENANCE: On-site water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage facilities shall be privately maintained by the property owner(s).

23. UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD SERVICES: All new and existing electric and telecommunication facilities serving the subdivision are to be placed underground, including transformers. The undergrounding of the new and existing overhead electric and telecommunication lines is to be completed prio r to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any new buildings within the subdivision. If allowed by the City, aboveground transformers shall be located so they are screened in the least visible location from the street or to the general public, as approved by the Community Development and Public Works Departments.

24. UNDERGROUNDING OF OVERHEAD LINES: Underground existing overhead electric and telecommunication facilities frontin g the property along Easy Street and/or within the division of land, unless waived by the City Council after consideration of t he r
ecommendation of the Public Works Director due to unusual or impractical circumstances. The undergrounding work shall be constructed in conjunction with any applicable off -site improvements and completed prior to issuance of a Certificate o f O
ccupancy for any new unit. All poles fronting the property and/or within the division of land shall be removed. If the undergrounding requirement is waived, the subdivider shall fulfill whatever substitute conditions the City shall impose prior to a f
inal map approval.

25. JOINT UTILITY PLANS: Upon submittal of the initial building permit and improvement plans, the applicant shall submit joint utility plans showing the location of the proposed electric, gas, and telecommunication conduits and associated facilities, including, but not limited to, vaults, manholes, cabinets, pedestals, etc. Appropriate horizontal and vertical clearances in accordance with PG&E requirements shall be provided between gas transmission lines, gas service lines, overhead utility lines, street trees, streetlights, and building structures. These plans shall be combined with and made part of the improvement plans.

Joint trench intent drawings will be accepted at first improvement plan submittal. All subsequent improvement plan submittal s
s
hall include joint trench design plans. Dedicate public utility easements that are necessary for the common utility on a final map.

GRADING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (ON-SITE)

26. LOT DRAINAGE: Each residential lot shall be designed to drain toward the streets, alleys, common driveways, or common areas. The drainage paths for the privately owned lots shall be designed such that the drainage paths do not cross the common M
N/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 5 of 6
property lines unless an exception is approved due to unavoidable circumstances by the Public Works Department, such as to provide drainage to an existing Heritage tree.

27. SURFACE WATER RELEASE: Provide a surface stormwater release for the lots, driveways, alleys, and private streets that prevents the residential buildings from being flooded in the event the storm drainage system becomes blocked or obstructed.

Show and identify path of surface water release on the improvement plans.

28. STORM DRAIN HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT: As portions of the site are or will be lower than the adjacent public street or the surface grade over the City’s storm mains, the owner shall sign an agreement to hold the City harmless against storm surcharges or blockages that may result in on-site flooding or damage prior to approval of a final map.

CC&RS

29. CC&Rs: Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for the homeowners association, together with a completed CC&R checklist, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney’s Office and the Community Development Department prior to approval and recordation of the map. Said covenants shall include and stipulate all of the standard provisions which are shown on the attached sheet. The checklist and proposed CC&Rs shall be annotated to show exactly where each of the standard provisions have been incorporated into the CC&R document.

30. CC&Rs, SPECIAL PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE: The homeowners association shall be responsible for replacing any special pavers or textured/colored concrete that is removed by the City to repair, replace, or maintain any City underground utilities locat ed within private streets, driveways, or easement areas. This r equirement shall be stated in the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A copy of the CC&Rs with this provision marked or highlighted shall be submitted to the Communit y D
evelopment Department for review and approval by the Public Works Departm ent.

31. CC&Rs, PRIVATE UTILITY MAINTENANCE PLAN: The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall include a provision that the homeowners association (HOA) prepare a private utility maintenance plan for on- site storm drainage facilities. The maintenance plan shall include elements, such as, but not limited to, flushing of the storm lines, and cleaning of storm drain inlets and grates A copy of the CC&Rs with this provision marked or highlighted shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval by the Public Works De partment.

32. CC&Rs, GARBAGE PICKUP (INDIVIDUAL SERVICE): The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall include a provision stating requirement to keep trash carts in designated storage area at all times except 24 hours prior to and 24 hou rs after the hauler assigned collection day. Each residence is responsible for bringing their trash, recycling, and compost carts to the street curb along Easy Street with wheels against the curb, 15’ overhead clearance, and 18” of separation between carts, by 6:00 a.m. on trash collection days. The CC&Rs shall also include an exhibit showing location of the carts on street for pick-up.

A copy of the CC&Rs with these provisions shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review a nd
a
pproval by the Public Works Department.

33. CC&Rs, PARKING RESTRICTION: Parking shall be prohibited within the common driveways, excluding approved guest parking, as the parking would obstruct the use of the driveway. These parking prohibitions shall be stated within the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A copy of the CC&Rs with this provision highlighted shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval by the Public Works Department. The common driveway shall be signed and/or striped as “No Parking” or “No Parking—Fire Lane.”

OTHER APPROVALS AND EXPIRATION

34. CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER APPROVALS: This map shall be consistent with all requirements of the Planned Unit Development Permit, Application No. PL-2024-018. All conditions of approval imposed under that application shall remain in full force and effect and shall be met prior to approval of a final map.

M
N/1/RESO
813-01-28-24r-1 6 of 6

35. APPROVAL EXPIRATION: If the map is not completed within 24 months from the date of this approval, this map shall expire.

The map is eligible for an extension of an additional 24 months, provided the application for extension is filed with the Planning Division by the applicant prior to the expiration of the original map. Upon filing a timely application for extension, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever occurs first
.

NOTE: As required by California Government Code Section 66020, the applicant is hereby notified that the 90 -day period has begun as of the date of approval of this application, in which the applicant may protest any fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed by the City as part of this approval or as a condition of approval. The fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions are described in the approved plans, conditions of approval, and/or the adopted City fee schedule.

A

MBER BLIZINSKI, ASSISTANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AB
/KP/1/CDD
813-12-18-24SD
SIX (6) LOT SUBDIVISION

CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW

LYING ENTIRELY WITHIN THE
SMP
CONSISTING OF ONE (1) SHEET
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043
198 EASY STREET
APN: 160-37-005

GENERAL INFORMATION
OWNER AND DEVELOPER: CIVIL ENGINEER
BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: BASIS OF BEARINGS:

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A PORTION OF LOT 87, AS SHOWN UPON THAT MAP ENTITLED, "MAP OF ESTRADA PARK", WHICH MAP WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE

OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON JANUARY 04, 1912 IN BOOK "N" PAGE 75 OF MAPS, AS DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED, DOCUMENT # 23465510, SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS.

LOT AREA TABLE

DESCRIPTION AREA
(SQFT.)
AREA
(ACRES)
LOT 1 1,569
LOT 2
LOT 3
LOT 4
LOT 5 4,356
LOT A
COMMON LOT 11,009
LOT B

DEDICATION IN FEE
TOTAL (EX.

PARCEL)
1,569
1,569
1,569

0.036

0.036

0.036

0.036

0.100

0.252
38 0.001
22,016 0.505
LOT C

DEDICATION IN FEE
338 0.008
STOP
APN: 160-37-010

KADAM SUDHIR/KADAM TEJASWI
30 GLADYS CT,
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94043
APN: 160-37-011

ATKINSON SCOTT C &
26 GLADYS CT,
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94043 MAILING ADDRESS:

APN: 160-37-003

KYRIALE PROPERTIES LLC
26 GLADYS CT,
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94043
MAILING ADDRESS:

KIM D/KIM SCOTT & ATKINSON
Exhibit B

← All documents from this meeting