Attachment 1
-1-
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
RESOLUTION NO.
SERIES 2025
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW
APPROVING A HISTORIC PRESERVATION PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT
EXTERIOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE REAR FACADE OF AN EXISTING ONE-STORY, 1,821 SQUARE FOOT HISTORIC SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A BASEMENT AND DETACHED GARAGE ON A 0.14-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 484 LORETO STREET (APN 158-30-060) AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS
EXEMPT FROM REVIEW UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, an application (Application No. PL-11180) was received from Daniel Fonseca, on behalf of Martin Bettge and Xinning Ho , for a Historic Preservation Permit to construct exterior modifications to the rear facade of an existing one-story, 1,821 square foot historic single-family residence with a basement and detached garage on a 0.14-acre site located at 484 Loreto Street (APN 158-30-060); and
WHEREAS, the subject property has a General Plan Land Use Designation of Low -Density Residential; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located in the R1 (Single -Family Residential) Zoning District; and
WHEREAS, the existing single-family residence on the subject property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register of Historic Resources and appears eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historic Resources under Criterion C/3/c as a significant example of architecture in planned communities of 1920s and 1930s , demonstrating the era’s dominant architectural trends; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on October 14, 2025 on said application and received and considered all evidence presented at said hearing, including the City Council report and project materials; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED: that, based on substantial evidence in the record, the City Council of the City of Mountain View finds the project to be categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code Section 21000, et seq. ) (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., Title 14) Section 1533 1 (“Historic Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation”) as described in further detail below; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED: that the City Council of the City of Mountain View makes the following findings regarding the Historic Preservation Permit to construct exterior modifications to an -2-
existing 1,821 square foot historic single-family residence with a basement and detached garage pursuant to Sections 36.54.85.d and 36.54.90 of the City Code:
a. The proposed significant alteration will not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of the historic resource. The proposed significant alteration will not result in substantial adverse changes in the significance of the historic resource because the project will retain most of the property’s historic materials and features, such as stucco cladding, Mission Revival parapets and pedimented gables, cornice with dentils, arched entry portico, bay window, and cutaway corners with molded b rackets and finials. While three of the original windows and a door are proposed for removal to accommodate installation of two new pairs of French doors providing access to a new wood deck , these windows and door are located on the rear (east) facade and are not visible from the public right-of-way. These alterations are located on the rear elevation, minimally visible from the public right -of-way, and would not impair the building’s ability to convey its historic significance. The alterations to the detached garage include new arched openings and w indows on its north, south, and east elevations; however, its west elevation, which features the Mission Revival parapet and other character -defining features visible from Bush Street, will remain intact. Therefore, the proposed alterations affect a minimal amount of historic material and do not diminish the significance of the resource.
b. The proposed significant alteration maintains and enhances the appearance of the community. The proposed significant alteration maintains and enhances the appearance of the community by retaining the primary street -facing facades and character -defining features that establish the historic and architectural presence of the property. The addition of the rear wood deck is modest in scale, compatible in materials, and minimally visible from public rights-of-way.
Similarly, the alt erations to the detached ga rage occur on elevations with limited visibility and maintain the integrity of its Bush Street fa cade. The project’s design preserves the traditional residential scale of the property and remains consistent with the surrounding Palmita Park neighborhood, which is characterized by single-family homes of varied period revival styles.
c. The alteration is in substantial compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. The project is in substantial compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (SOIS) for Rehabilitation, as supported by the SOIS compliance analysis memorandum prepared by Page & Turnbull, Inc. (Page & Turnbull) , dated August 19, 2025 ( see Attachment 4 to the October 14, 2025 Council report (SOIS Compliance Analysis), incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein) and the following facts. The project retains the historic residential use of the property and preserves the distinctive Bush Street fa cade of the detached garage in its entirety (Rehabilitation Standard 1). The historic character of the property is retained through the preservation of the primary Mission Revival features, including the overall siting and setback, the cross-gable roof with pedimented gables, the stucco cladding, the cornice with dentils, the cutaway corners with molded brackets and finials, and all original fenestration visible from public rights -of-way. The project requires the removal of only two of the 11 nine-over-one windows, one partially glazed wood door, and one fixed two-lite wood window located at the rear of the north elevation in order to accommodate new French doors. These alterations are located at the rear and are not visible from the public -3-
right-of-way. Their removal does not impair the building’s ability to convey its architectural and historic significance (Rehabilitation Standard 2).
The new rear deck is designed in a contemporary style, and the new arched openings at the garage, while referencing features of the residence, are simpler and larger in scale, so they would not create a false sense of historical development (Rehabilitation Standard 3). No changes are proposed that would affect alterations that have acquired significance over time. The property’s period of significance is the 1920s, and prior minor alterations, such as replacement doors and decorative tile at the front porch steps, have not achieved historic significance (Rehabilitation Standard 4). Distinctive features of the property, including the pedimented gables, cornice dentils, and decorative brackets, are preserved. The limited removal of windows at the rear elevation does not affect these character -defining features and is restricted to what is necessary to accommodate the new French doors (Rehabilitation Standard 5). The project does not propose repair by replacement of deteriorated features (Rehabilitation Standard 6). The project does not propose any chemical or abra sive treatments that would damage the existing structure (Rehabilitation Standard 7). The proposed work does not require any major ground disturbance that may impact archaeological resources on site (Rehabilitation Standard 8). The new deck is modest in size, located at the rear of the residence, and not visible from the public right-of-way. Its wood construction is compatible with the historic property, while its contemporary design differentiates it as new. The French doors at the rear replicate the divid ed light pattern found in the projecting bay window while remaining distinct in design and placement. The garage modifications are limited to elevations not visible from the public right- of-way and are compatible yet distinguishable through their simplified design (Rehabilitation Standard 9). If the deck were removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property as viewed from the street would remain intact (Rehabilitation Standard 10).
d. The approval of the Historic Preservation Permit complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Historic Preservation Permit complies with CEQA because it qualifies as a categorically exempt project per CEQA Guidelines Section 15331 (“Historic Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation”). The project proposes minimal facade modifications to the rear elevation and detached garage that are both differentiated from and compatible with the existing historic single-family residence with a proportion, scale, and exterior materials that maintain the historic resource in a manner consistent with the SOIS for Rehabilitation. The area of facade modifications is not visible from the public right -of-way, and the proposed alteration would not diminish the historic character of the residence. The City retained Page & Turnbull to prepare a Historic Resource Assessment (HRA), dated January 2, 2025. The applicant submitted an SOIS Compliance Analysis Memorandum prepared by Page & Turnbull and dated August 19, 2025 . The HRA and SOIS analysis reports conclude that the proposed project would not result in an adverse change to the historic resource. CEQA Guidelines Section 15331 applies to projects consistent with the SOIS for the Treatment of Historic Properties. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(1), if a project is in compliance with all 10 Standards for Rehabilitation, the project’s impacts “shall generally be considered mitigated below a level of significance and thus is not significant.” The proposed exterior modifications will serve to complement or match the original characteristics of the existing building, and the -4-
original portions of the historic residence will retain the features, design, and context that make the building significant for its Mission Revival architecture. The project complies with the SOIS Standards for Rehabilitation and Section 36.54.90 of the City Code. Therefore, as currently designed, the project would not result in project-specific impacts and does not have the potential to cause a substantial adverse change to the historical resource as defined by CEQA or the City Code; and be it;
FURTHER RESOLVED: that the City Council hereby approves the Historic Preservation Permit for the project at 484 Loreto Street based on the findings above and subject to the applicant’s fulfillment of all the conditions of approval, which are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.
TIME FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
The time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought is governed by California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, as established by Resolution No. 13850, adopted by the City Council on August 9, 1983.
– – – – – – – – – – –
CDD/DP-10-14-25r
Exhibit: A. Conditions of Approval
Exhibit A
CDD/DP
PL-11180-COA Page 1 of 5
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
APPLICATION NO.: PL-11180
484 LORETO STREET
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that the applicant is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Mountain View City Code and the State of California. Where approval by a City Department Director or Official is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws, and regulations, and accepted practices for the item (s) under review. The applicant is hereby notified that the applicant is required to comply with all applicable codes or ordinances of the City of Mountain View and the State of California that pertain to this development and are noted herein.
This approval is granted to construct exterior modifications to the rear facade of an existing one -story, 1,821 square foot historic single-family residence with a basement and a detached garage located on Assessor’s Parcel No. 158 -30-060. Development shall be substantially as shown on the project materials listed below, except as may be modified by conditions contained herein, which are kept on file in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department:
a. Project plans prepared by Daniel Fonseca, dated July 22, 2025.
b. Historic Resource Assessment prepared by Page & Turnbull , and Secretary of the Interior Standards Compliance Analysis Memorandum prepared by Walker Shores with Page & Turnbull, dated August 19, 2025.
THIS REQUEST IS GRANTED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
Planning Division—650-903-6306 or [email protected]
1. EXPIRATION: This permit is valid for a period of four years from the date of approval. This permit shall become null and void if building permits have not been issued and construction activity has not commenced within the four-year period unless a permit extension has been submitted to and approved by the Zoning Administrator at a duly noticed public hearing prior to the expiration date.
2. PERMIT EXTENSION: Zoning permits may be extended for up to two years after an Administrative Zoning public hearing, in compliance with procedures described in Chapter 36 of the City Code. An application for extension must be filed with the Planning Division, including appropriate fees, prior to the original expiration date of the permit(s).
3. PLANNING INSPECTION: Inspection(s) by the Planning Division are required for foundation, framing, application of exterior materials, and final completion of each structure to ensure that the construction matches the approved plans.
PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
4. CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PERMIT PLANS: In a letter, the project architect shall certify the architectural design shown in the building permit plans match the approved plans. Any changes or modifications must be clearly noted in writing and shown on redlined plan sheets. The project architect shall also certify the structural plans are consistent with the architectural plans.
In the event of a discrepancy between the structural plans and the architectural plans, the architectural plans shall take precedence, and revised structural drawings shall be submitted to the Building Division.
5. ACCESSORY STRUCTURE(S): Any future accessory structure on -site will require approval by the Planning Division and may require separate City permits.
6. ZONING INFORMATION: The following information must be listed on the title sheet of the building permit drawings: (a) zoning permit application number; (b) zoning district designation; (c) total floor area ratio and residential density in units per a cre, if applicable; (d) lot area (in square feet and acreage); and (e) total number of parking spaces.
CDD/DP
PL-11180-COA Page 2 of 5
7. REVISIONS TO THE APPROVED PROJECT: Minor revisions to the approved project, including conditions of approval, shall require approval by the Zoning Administrator. Major modifications as determined by the Zoning Administrator shall require a duly noticed public hearing, which can be referred to the City Council.
8. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) DIAGRAM: Building permit drawings must include a floor area ratio (FAR) diagram for each structure on-site, clearly identifying each level of the structure(s) and the gross area(s) which count toward floor area per required zoning calculations. The diagram must also clearly identify all areas which are exempt from FAR.
9. COLOR CHIPS: At submittal of building plan check, provide a set of color chips, and the color scheme shall be shown on the elevations.
SITE DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING DESIGN
10. EXTERIOR MATERIALS: High-quality materials and finishes shall be used throughout the project and shall remain in compliance with the materials identified in the approved plans, except as modified by the conditions of approval herein. Details regarding all color and architectural details shall be provided in the building permit plan submittal and shall be subject to review an d approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of building permits.
11. WINDOWS AND DOORS : Manufacturer type, design, material, and installation details for all windows and doors within the project shall be specified in the building permit drawings for review and approval by the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of building permits.
12. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (GROUND SCREENING): All mechanical equipment, such as air condenser (AC) units or generators, shall be concealed behind opaque screening. No mechanical equipment is permitted on front porches or balconies but may be located in the fenced yard area or building rooftops.
13. FENCE(S)/WALL(S): All fencing and walls are to be shown on building plan drawings, including details on height, location, and material finish. No fence or wall shall exceed 6’ in height, measured from adjacent grade to the top of the fence or wall. The design and location must be approved by the Zoning Administrator and comply with all setback and traffic visibility area requirements.
NOISE
14. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (NOISE): The noise emitted by any mechanical equipment shall not exceed a level of 55 dB(A) during the day or 50 dB(A) during the night, 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., when measured at any location on the adjoining residentially used property.
15. CONSTRUCTION NOISE REDUCTION: The following noise reduction measures shall be incorporated into construction plans and contractor specifications to reduce the impact of temporary construction -related noise on nearby properties: (a) comply with manufacturer’s muffler requirements on all construction equipment engines; (b) turn off construction equipment when not in use, where applicable; (c) locate stationary equipment as far as practical from receiving properties; (d) use tempora ry sound barriers or sound curtains around loud stationary equipment if the other noise reduction methods are not effective or possible; and (e) shroud or shield impact tools and use electric-powered rather than diesel-powered construction equipment.
HISTORIC RESOURCES
16. SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR STANDARDS: All construction activities, including maintenance, repair, stabilization, rehabilitation, restoration, preservation, conservation, or reconstruction of the historical resource, shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (Weeks and Grimmer 1995).
CDD/DP
PL-11180-COA Page 3 of 5
17. DOCUMENTATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCE: Prior to issuance of a building permit for any work being done on the historic structure, the applicant shall provide the following documentation: two (2) copies of each historical assessment, printed on archival paper, and one (1) complete set of photographs of the existing property (including the immediate neighborhood to establish context), the site (including any non -historic structure), and all exterior elevations and features. The applicant shall produce high-quality images (20 megapixels or higher), either through the use of a digital camera or a film camera (black and white film only). Digital photographs shall be provided on an external drive. Any physical photographs shall be printed on fiber paper of archival quality in black and white. Documentation shall be submitted to the Planning Division and will be stored in the Mountain View History Center.
All documentation shall be forwarded to the Planning Division (one copy of which will be forwarded to the Mountain View History Center) prior to the issuance of any building or demolition permits for the property.
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
18. DISTURBANCE COORDINATOR: The applicant shall designate a “disturbance coordinator” who will be responsible for responding to any local complaints regarding construction noise. The coordinator (who may be an employee of the general contractor) will determine the cause of the complaint and will require that reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem be implemented. A telephone number of the noise disturbance coordinator shall be conspicuously posted at the construction site fence and on the notification sent to neighbors adjacent to the site. The sign must also list an emergency after-hours contact number for emergency personnel.
19. HEALTH AND SAFETY MEASURES: The permittee/contractor is responsible for preparing and implementing an appropriate health and safety plan to address the contamination and manage the operations in a safe manner and in compliance with the Cal/OSHA Construction Safety Orders and other state and federal requirements.
20. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CONTAMINATION: To reduce the potential for construction workers and adjacent uses to encounter hazardous materials contamination from asbestos -containing materials (ACM) and lead -based paint, the following measures are to be included in the project:
a. In conformance with local, state, and federal laws, an asbestos building survey and a lead -based paint survey shall be completed by a qualified professional to determine the presence of ACMs and/or lead -based paint on the structures proposed for demolition. The surveys shall be completed prior to demolition work beginning on the structures.
b. A registered asbestos abatement contractor shall be retained to remove and dispose of all potentially friable ACMs, in accordance with the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) guidelines, prior to building demolition that may disturb the materials. All construction activities shall be undertaken in accordance with Cal/OSHA standards, contained in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR), Section 1529, to protect workers from exposure to asbestos. Materials containing more than 1% asbestos are also subject to Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) regulations.
During demolition activities, all building materials containing lead -based paint shall be removed in accordance with Cal/OSHA Lead in Construction Standard, Title 8, CCR 1532.1, including employee training, employee air monitoring, and dust control.
Any debris or soil containing lead-based paint or coatings shall be disposed of at landfills that meet acceptance criteria for the waste being disposed.
21. BASIC AIR QUALITY CONSTRUCTION MEASURES: The applicant shall require all construction contractors to implement the basic construction mitigation measures recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) to reduce fugitive dust emissions. Emission reduction measures will include, at a minimum, the following measures: (a) all exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) will be watered two times p er day; (b) all haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site will be covered; (c) all visi ble mud or dirt track - out onto adjacent public roads will be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited; (d) all vehicle speeds on unpaved roads will be limited to 15 mph; (e) all roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved will be completed as soon as possible. Building pads will be laid as soon as possible after grading CDD/DP
PL-11180-COA Page 4 of 5
unless seeding or soil binders are used; (f) idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measures Title 13, Section 2485, of the California Code of Regulations). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points; (g) all construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications.
All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation; and (h) post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the City of Mountain View regarding dust complaints. This person will respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. BAAQMD’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations.
22. DISCOVERY OF CONTAMINATED SOILS: If contaminated soils are discovered, the applicant will ensure the contractor employs engineering controls and Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize human exposure to potential contaminants.
Engineering controls and construction BMPs will include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) contractor employees working on-site will be certified in OSHA’s 40-hour Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response (HAZWOPER) training; (b) the contractor will stockpile soi l during redevelopment activities to allow for proper characterization and evaluation of disposal options; (c) the contractor will monitor area around construction site for fugitive vapor emissions with appropriate field screening instrumentation; (d) the contractor will water/mist soil as it is being excavated and loaded onto transportation trucks; (e) the contractor will place any stockpiled soil in areas shielded from prevailing winds; and (f) the contractor will cover the bottom of excavated areas with sheeting when work is not being performed.
23. DISCOVERY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: If prehistoric or historic-period cultural materials are unearthed during ground- disturbing activities, it is recommended that all work within 100’ of the find be halted until a qualified archaeologist and Native American representative can assess the sign ificance of the find. Prehistoric materials might include obsidian and chert -flaked stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, scrapers) or tool-making debris; culturally darkened soil (“midden”) containing heat- affected rocks and artifacts; stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, handstones, or milling slabs); and battered -stone tools, such as hammerstones and pitted stones. Historic-period materials might include stone, concrete, or adobe footings and walls; filled wells or privies; and deposits of metal, glass, and/or ceramic refuse. If the find is determined to be potentially significant, the archaeologist, in consultation with the Native American representative, will develop a treatment plan that could include site avoidance, capping, or data recovery.
24. DISCOVERY OF HUMAN REMAINS: In the event of the discovery of human remains during construction or demolition, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site within a 50’ radius of the location of such discovery, or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains. The Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified and shall make a determination as to whether the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines that the remains are not subject to their authority, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which shall attempt to identify descendants of the deceased Native American. If no satisfactory agreement can be reached as to the disposition of the remains pursuant to this state law, then the landowner shall reinter the human remains and items associated with Native American burials on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance. A final report shall be submitted to the City’s Community Development Director prior to release of a Certificate of Occupancy. This report shall contain a description of the mitigation programs and its results, including a description of the monitoring and testing resources analysis methodology and conclusions, and a description of the disposition/curation of the resources. The report shall verify completion of the mitigation program to the satisfaction of the City’s Community Development Director.
25. DISCOVERY OF PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES: In the event that a fossil is discovered during construction of the project, excavations within 50’ of the find shall be temporarily halted or delayed until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards. The City shall include a standard inadvertent discovery clause in every construction contract to inform contractors of this requirement. If the find is determined to be significant and if avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall design and carry out a data recovery plan consistent w ith the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards.
Building Division—650-903-6313 or [email protected]
Entitlement review by the Building Division is preliminary. Building and Fire plan check reviews are separate permit processes applied for once the zoning approval has been obtained and appeal period has concluded; a formal permit submittal to the Building Div ision CDD/DP
PL-11180-COA Page 5 of 5
is required. Plan check review shall determine the specific requirements and construction compliance in accordance with adopted local, state, and federal codes for all building and/or fire permits. For more information on submittal requirements and timelines, contact the Building Division online at www.mountainview.gov/building. It is a violation of the MVCC for any building occupancy or construction to commence without the proper building and/or fire permits and issued Certificate of Occupancy.
26. BUILDING CODES: Construction plans will need to meet the current codes adopted by the Building Division upon building permit submittal. Current codes are the 2022 California Codes: Building, Residential, Fire, Electrical, Mechanical, Plumbing, CALGreen, CALEnergy, in conjunction with the City of Mountain View Amendments, and the Mountain View Green Building Code (MVGBC).
Please note that the 2025 California Codes may be applicable depending on the time of building submittal .
27. USE AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: Provide proposed use(s) and occupancy(ies) for the proposed project per the CBC, Chapter 3.
28. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: Provide the type of proposed construction per Chapter 6 of the CBC.
29. EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENINGS: The project shall comply with the egress window requirements per the CRC, Section R310.
30. MVGBC CALGREEN: If required, the project shall comply with the Mountain View CALGreen checklist requirements available online at www.mountainview.gov/greenbuilding (e.g., conversion of the existing garage into habitable space).
31. FIRE ACCESS LANE(S): The site must always meet/maintain the existing fire access lane(s).
32. STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS: Structural calculations may be required once the application for a building permit is submitted.
33. SCHOOL IMPACT FEE: The project may be subject to school impact fees. To obtain information, fee estimates, and procedures, please contact the following local school districts: Mountain View Los Altos Union High School District at www.mvla.net or 650- 940-4650; and Mountain View Whisman School District at www.mvwsd.org or 650-526-3500; or Los Altos School District at www.lasdschools.org or 650-947-1150.
34. PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION: Pedestrians shall be protected during construction, remodeling, and demolition; additionally, if required, signs shall be provided to direct pedestrian traffic. Provide sufficient information at the time of building plan submittal of how pedestrians will be protected from construction activity per the CBC, Section 3306.
35. WORK HOURS/CONSTRUCTION SITE SIGNAGE: No work shall commence on the job site prior to 7:00 a.m. nor continue later than 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, nor shall any work be permitted on Saturday or Sunday or any holiday unless prior approval is granted by the Chief Building Official. The general contractor, applicant, developer, or property owner shall erect a sign at all construction site entrances/exits to advise subcontractors and material suppliers of the working hours (see job c ard for specifics) and contact information, including an after-hours contact. Violation of this condition of approval may be subject to the penalties outlined in Section 8.70 of the MVCC and/or suspension of building permits.
NOTE: As required by California Government Code Section 66020, the applicant is hereby notified that the 90 -day period has begun as of the date of approval of this application, in which the applicant may protest any fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions imposed by the City as part of this approval or as a condition of approval. The fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions are described in the approved plans, conditions of approval, and/or the adopted City fee schedule.