170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 Imagining change in historic environments through
design, research, and technology
MEMORANDUM
DATE August 19, 2025 PROJECT
NUMBER
25066
TO Martin Bettge PROJECT 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View OF 484 Loreto Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
FROM Walker Shores, Architectural Historian
Cultural Resources Planner
Stacy Kozakavich, Cultural Resources
Planner, Project Manger
CC Christina Dikas, Principal-in-Charge VIA Email
REGARDING 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Analysis
This Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Analysis memorandum has been prepared at the request of the property owner for a proposed project located at 484 Loreto Street (APN 158-30-060) in the Palmita Park neighborhood of Mountain View. The subject building is a one- story residential building built in 1924 by the Minton Company, the primary developer of Palmita Park. The building includes features of the Classical Revival and Mission Revival architectural styles. 484 Loreto Street is currently listed on the Mountain View Register of Historic Resources, and has been previously found eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) and National Register of Historic Places (National Register). 1 The property owners are proposing a project that would involve exterior alterations to the residence, including altering openings and constructing a wood deck at the north (rear) elevation, and altering the east end of the detached garage with new openings. The purpose of this memorandum is to review the proposed exterior alterations to the historic residence for compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties , specifically the Standards for Rehabilitation, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 1 Carey & Co. Inc., “Citywide Historic Properties Survey Part II” Prepared for the City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008, page 97-99.
Attachment 4
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 Methodology
Page & Turnbull conducted a site visit on April 11, 2025 to document existing conditions and to develop a list of character-defining features to guide the analysis of the proposed project’s compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Page & Turnbull reviewed the proposed project plan set for 484 Loreto Street titled “484 Loreto St,” prepared by Oasis Home Design Studio (dated July 22, 2025) that was provided to Page & Turnbull via email on April 24, 2025. Page & Turnbull also reviewed historic building construction permits provided by the City of Mountain View, historic architectural drawings, historic maps, and aerial photographs to gain an understanding of past alterations to the property.
Historic Status
484 Loreto Street was surveyed in 2007 during the completion of the Citywide Historic Properties Survey and was assigned a National Register of Historic Places (National Register) 3S rating.2 3S indicates the building “appears eligible for the National Register individually through survey evaluation.” The Department of Parks and Recreation 523 survey form (DPR form) for 484 Loreto Street which was prepared at the time of the survey did not assign a period of significance or list specific character-defining features of the property. The DPR form identified the design of the building as an “eclectic mix of [the] Mission and Classical Revival” style and a “significant example of architecture in planned communities of 1920s and 1930s America.”3 The DPR form is included in Appendix A.
An in-progress historic resources survey update for Mountain View has confirmed the previous finding of significance for the 484 Loreto Street, which the updated evaluation has found eligible for continued listing on the Mountain View Register, as well as the California Register and National Register.4 The building was found significant as the first residence constructed in the Palmita Park subdivision, and as a good example of its eclectic interpretation of the Mission Revival architectural style. The period of significance was identified as 1924, the year of construction. The updated DPR forms are included in Appendix B.
484 Loreto Street is currently listed on the Mountain View Register, and the property has an active Mills Act contract.
2 Carey & Co. Inc., “Citywide Historic Properties Survey Parts I and II” Prepared for the City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008.
3 Carey & Co. Inc., “Citywide Historic Properties Survey Part II” Prepared for the City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008, page 97-99.
4 Page & Turnbull, City of Mountain View: Citywide Historic Resources Survey Report – Administrative Draft (San Francisco:
Prepared for the City of Mountain View, January 10, 2025), 40. 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Architectural Description
The 2007 DPR form includes a brief architectural description of the subject property. This section is supplemental to that description to provide context for the list of character-defining features and analysis of the proposed project.
484 Loreto Street is located in Palmita Park at the northeast corner of the intersection formed by Bush Street and Loreto Street, and includes a single-family residence and a detached garage (Figure 1). The residence is generally rectangular shaped in plan, set on a concrete foundation, and clad in stucco. The building is capped with a low pitched cross gable roof clad in asphalt shingles with pedimented gables at the west elevation. Dentils line the cornice on the south, west, and north elevations and frame both pediments.
The south (primary) façade features a prominent Mission Revival style, shaped archway and parapet that leads to the covered front porch.5 The gable at the southwest corner features cutaway corners with molded brackets and downward finials (Figure 2 and Figure 3). A stucco external chimney is located on the primary façade. Typical windows are wood-frame double-hung divided-lite windows.
Figure 1. Residence at 484 Loreto Street, looking north.
5 The subject residence is not aligned along true cardinal directions. The primary façade faces southwest, but for the purposes of this memo, the primary façade will be referred to as the south façade, and so on.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Figure 2. Detail view of angled window and braces at
west end of primary façade. Looking north.
Figure 3. Detail view of window west (left) of primary
entrance. Looking northwest.
The west elevation faces Bush Street, and features the two pedimented gables at the north (left) and south (right) ends, each within projecting volumes (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Typical windows are featured within all three sides of each projecting volume, and on the west -facing wall between them.
Two rectangular wood louvered vents are located near the center of the west elevation, one immediately below the cornice, and one at the level of the ground floor. At the time of the site visit, the latter was obscured from view by a shrub.
Figure 4. Oblique view of the north (left) half of the
west elevation. Looking northeast.
Figure 5. Oblique view of the south (right) half of the west elevation. Looking southeast.
The north (rear) elevation faces the rear yard. It features a wood panel door at the center with a wood stoop, and a wood-frame two-lite fixed window immediately to its west (right). Typical windows are featured at the east (left) and west (right) ends of the elevation (Figure 6). A circular, painted aluminum louvered vent is set within the gable end. The east elevation features a variety of typical windows, and tile clad steps leading from the covered front porch (Figure 7).
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Figure 6. Oblique view of the north (rear) elevation.
Looking southwest.
Figure 7. Oblique view of the east elevation. Looking
southwest.
The detached garage is located at the northwest corner of the parcel, north of the residence. It features a pair of wood multi-lite swinging doors and a Mission style shaped parapet on its west elevation, a wood panel door on its south elevation, and a wood-frame double-hung window on its east elevation (Figure 8 and Figure 9). The east elevation of the garage also features a pedimented gable, and denticulations are featured on the north, east, and south elevation cornices.
Figure 8. Oblique view of west elevation of detached
garage. Looking northeast.
Figure 9. Oblique view of south elevation (left) and
east elevation (right) of detached garage. Looking
northwest.
Construction Chronology
The residence and detached garage were both constructed in 1924 by the Minton Company, a local developer, and the developer of the Palmita Park subdivision (Figure 10 and Figure 11). 484 Loreto
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 Street was the first home built in Palmita Park, originally constructed for Alfred and Emily Olson.6 Alfred Olson was the company treasurer of the Minton Company and a member of its board of directors.7 According to the 2007 evaluation form, the Olson family maintained ownership of the subject property into the 1980s.
Building permit research shows that the main residence and detached garage were reroofed in 2011.8 Original wood windows were renovated to double-pane, within the original wood sashes.9
Figure 10. Original architectural drawings of the primary façade, 1924. Source: “A. Olson ”, by The Minton Company, Inc, (March 10, 1924), Sheet 1. Provided courtesy of the property owner.
6 City of Mountain View Register of Historic Resources, “484 Loreto Street,” March 15, 2002. 7 “Boom makes rapid progress in Palmita Park,” The Mountain View Register Leader, May 1, 1925. 8 Building Permits No. 2011-2408, 2011-2409. On file at the City of Mountain View Community Development Department. 9 Conversation with property owner, April 11, 2025.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Figure 11. Original architectural drawings of the west and east elevations, and the primary elevation of the detached garage, 1924. Source: “A. Olson ”, by The Minton Company, Inc, (March 10, 1924), Sheet 3. Provided courtesy of the property owner.
Character-Defining Features
For a property to be eligible for listing in a local historic register, the essential physical features (or character-defining features) that enable the property to convey its historic identity must be evident.
To be eligible, a property must contain enough of those characteristics, and these features must also retain a sufficient degree of integrity. Characteristics can be expressed in terms such as form, proportion, structure, plan, style, or materials.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Page & Turnbull developed the following list of character-defining features for 484 Loreto Street based upon primary architectural features identified in the 2025 DPR form, review of historic construction documentation, and observations made during the site visit. The character -defining features relate to the property’s architectural character, particularly the elements of the Mission Revival and Classical Revival styles, as well as its design relative to neighboring properties which were part of the Palmita Park development. Those features that date to the period of significance and which contribute to its architectural character, or which represent compatible replacements of such original features, are character-defining.
The character-defining features for 484 Loreto Street include:
• Overall siting and scale, including historic setback
• Complex plan and massing
• Stucco cladding
• Mission Revival parapets and pedimented gables
• Cornice with dentils
• Entry portico with arched opening
• Bay window with projecting eave
• Cutaway corners and molded brackets with downward finials at southwest corner • Attached planting bed
• 12-over-one and 9-over-one double-hung wood sash windows with ogee lugs, where present • Detached garage with shaped parapet and wing walls, dentils, pedimented cornice, and paired side-hinge door
While compatible overall with the Mission Revival elements of the building’s style, such as the shaped parapets, stucco cladding, and arched openings, the decorative ceramic tiles at the front porch steps, facing Loreto Avenue, do not appear to be original . Drawings for the house, dated 1924, specify “cement” front steps and landing, which appears to be the material present at other nearby properties in Palmita Park which exhibit similar Mission Revival and Spanish Colonial Revival characteristics.
Proposed Project Description
The proposed project description is based on the scope of work described and illustrated in the drawing set for 484 Loreto Street, titled “484 Loreto St”, by Oasis Home Design Studio, dated July 22, 2025 (included in the Appendix C of this memorandum). The proposed project includes the following alterations (Figure 12 through Figure 14):
• 158 square-foot wood deck at the northeast corner of the building. The deck would attach to the east (left) side of the north elevation, and feature wide wood steps leading north and 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 east, wrapping around the northeast corner of the deck, and would include a wood sidewall containing a planter box on its west side, closest to Bush Street, and wrapping around the northwest corner of the deck. The construction of the deck and its entrances to and from the house would include the following alterations to the residence:
o removal of one pair of existing, original nine-over-one divided lite windows at the east end of the north elevation, and enlargement of this opening and installation of new French doors
o removal of existing wood door and wood window at the center of the north elevation, and enlargement of the openings into one opening for installation of new French doors
o Stucco patching around altered openings
• Renovation of the garage for additional use as a storage and activity space with increased access from the rear yard, including:
o new arched openings at the northeast and southeast corners of the detached garage o new arched windows on the north and south elevation of the detached garage o new opening at the east elevation of the detached garage, to be left open 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Figure 12. Existing and proposed north elevations, showing altered openings and new deck. Source: “484 Loreto St”, by Oasis Home Design Studio, (July 22, 2025), Sheet A6.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Figure 13. Existing and proposed west elevations, showing altered openings and new deck at the north (left).
Proposed is at the top, existing is at the bottom. Source: “484 Loreto St”, by Oasis Home Design Studio, (July 22, 2025), Sheet A6.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Figure 14. Elevations, floorplan, and rendering of alterations to detached garage. Source: “484 Loreto St”, by Oasis Home Design Studio, (July 22, 2025), Sheet A7.
Table 1, below, provides a summary of the proposed alterations to the character-defining features of the property.
Table 1. Proposed retention and alteration of character-defining features Character-Defining Feature Retained?
Overall siting and scale, including historic setback Yes Complex plan and massing Yes
Stucco Cladding Yes
Mission Revival parapets and pedimented gables Yes
Cornice with dentils Yes
Entry portico with arched opening Yes
Bay window with projecting eave Yes
Cutaway corners and molded brackets with downward finials at southwest corner
Yes
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
Character-Defining Feature Retained?
Attached planting bed Yes
12-over-one and 9-over-one double-hung wood sash windows with ogee lugs, where present
Partially (two of eleven
nine-over-one windows
would be removed)
Detached garage with shaped parapet and wing walls, dentils, pedimented cornice, and paired side-hinge door
Yes
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation Compliance Section 36.54.90 of Mountain View’s historic preservation ordinance states:
Alterations to buildings that are eligible for the National Register or the California Register shall be reviewed pursuant to Section 36.54.85 Requirement of permit — Development review process subsections a., b., c., and d. and except that the city council shall determine whether to grant a historic preservation “HP” permit and the council must find that the alteration is in substantial compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. If an HP permit is granted, any structure proposed to replace a historic resource shall be subject to design review and approval by the city council. 10
As 484 Loreto Street has previously been found eligible for listing on the National Register, the proposed project must be found substantially compliant with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards prior to issuance of an HP permit.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (the Standards) provide guidance for reviewing proposed work on historic properties and are a useful analytic tool for understanding and describing the potential impacts of substantial changes to historic resources. 11 Non-conformance with the Standards does not determine whether a project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource. Rather, projects that comply with the Standards benefit from a regulatory presumption that they wil l have a less-than-significant adverse impact on a historic resource, and are categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA. Projects that do not fully comply with the Standards may or may not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historic resource.
The Secretary of the Interior offers four sets of standards to guide the treatment of historic properties: Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration, and Reconstruction. Typically, one set of Standards is chosen for a project based on the project scope. For the purposes of the proposed project at 484 Loreto Street, the Standards for Rehabilitation, which “acknowledge the need to alter or add to a historic building to meet continuing or new uses while retaining the building’s historic character,” are the appropriate Standards for the proposed project’s scope. 12’
10 City of Mountain View. A Codification of the General Ordinances of the City of Mountain View, California, 18.13, § 1 § Division 15 (1938).
11 Anne E. Grimmer, The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings, (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Technical Preservation Services, 2017). 12 Grimmer, The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 The following discussion considers the proposed project’s potential effects on the historic status of, and compatibility with, the residential building at 484 Loreto Street, and provides comments on whether the project appears to adhere to the ten Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.
1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment.
The proposed project would continue the residential use of the residence, and expand the use of the garage to facilitate storage in addition to auto parking. The character defining features of the detached garage at its distinctive Bush Street façade, would not be altered. Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 1.
2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.
Many of the historic materials and features that characterize the original Mission and Classical Revival style building would be retained. Character-defining features that would be retained include the overall massing and site setback, cross-gable roof, pedimented gable ends, stucco cladding, dentils, cutaway corners and the original fenestration on the street-facing elevations. The sole character-defining feature that will be altered are the windows; of the existing eleven nine -over-one windows, two will be removed from the east side of the north façade. All character-defining windows at the west and south elevations, which face Loreto and Bush streets, would be retained.
Construction of new entrances for the proposed rear deck would alter three original openings at the north elevation, which currently consist of one pair of nine-over-one divided-lite double-hung windows, one partially glazed door, and one two-lite fixed wood window. The project would remove the original windows and door, and expand the openings to install two pairs of French doors. The project would also remove the existing rear staircase, which is not character -defining, to install the proposed rear deck. The features which would be changed by the project are minimally visible from public right-of-way, on the side of the rear elevation farthest away from the public right-of-way at Bush Street. Their removal would not impair the ability of the building to convey its significance , as their removal would not be visible from the street. Nine of the nine-over-one divided-lite windows would remain, including all of those visible from the public rights-of-way. The new French doors added to enlarged openings at the rear façade would be wood or clad wood and of a simple, contemporary style with ten-lite glazing in each leaf. The location and scale of these new doors would not detract from the distinctive features concentrated on the west and south sides of the house. Construction of the proposed deck would not meaningfully impact significant spatial 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 relationships at the site, such as the orientation of the residence to the detached garage, and would not meaningfully impact circulation routes.
The alterations to the detached garage would remove one original undivided wood window and a wood door, add new arched windows to the north and south elevations, add a new window opening to the east elevation, to remail open, and add arched openings at the southeast and northwest corners. The features changed by the alteration of the garage are also minimally visible, and would not impair the ability of the garage to contribute to the significance of the residence.
Thus, the removal of the specified original openings is not likely to affect the historic character of the residence and the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 2.
3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken.
No conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings would be added to the original building. The proposed rear deck would not create a false sense of historical development.
At the garage, while the design for the proposed new arched openings is inspired by the cutaway corners at the southwest corner of the residence, the new features at the garage would differ from the original in scale and detail; those on the garage would be larger and simpler, framing an opening in the wall rather than a window, and would not be mistaken for an original historic feature.
Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 3.
4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved.
The property has a period of significance of 1924, the year of construction, associated with its Mission and Classical Revival style architectural influences. The building has been altered little over time, including the replacement of some doors within original openings, and floor tile at the front entrance, but none of these alterations have acquired historic significance in their own right. Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 4.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a historic property shall be preserved.
The distinctive features of the residence and detached garage, including the pedimented gable ends, dentils, and cutaway corner and molded brackets, would be retained in the proposed project. The replacement of original windows are limited to the rear of the building and minimally visible from the street, and would not impact the craftsmanship or character of the building. The project proposes to remove only what is necessary to complete the project. This alteration is therefore unlikely to impair the ability of the building to convey its significance. Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 5.
6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.
No missing or previously altered features are proposed to be repaired or replaced. Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 6.
7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
The project does not propose any physical or chemical treatments to historic materials or finishes.
Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 7.
8. Significant archeological resources affected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken.
As currently planned, the proposed project does not involve any major ground disturbance. In the case of the inadvertent discovery of archaeological materials during ground disturbing activity, provided that standard discovery procedures for the City of Mountain View are followed, the proposed project would be in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 8.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.
The proposed project would construct a 158 square-foot deck at the northeast corner of the residence, attached to the east end of the north elevation. The deck would be at the rear side of the house and would be minimally visible from the Bush Street and Loreto Street public rights-of-way, therefore compatible in its modest size and scale. The proposed deck surface material would be wood plank, a material compatible with the design of the existing building, and which has been used for rear steps since the construction of the property. The proposed contemporary design of the deck, utilizing treated wood, would be sufficiently differentiated from the original portions of the building that it would be legible as a new feature. The original windows and original door at the north elevation of the residence would be altered, The project would alter three original openings at the north elevation, which currently consist of one pair of nine-over-one divided-lite double-hung windows, one partially glazed door, and one two-lite fixed wood window. The project would remove the original windows and door, and expand the openings to install two pairs of French doors. The project would also remove the existing rear staircase, which is not character -defining, to install the proposed rear deck.
The windows and door which would be removed for alterations at the rear elevation are minimally visible from the public right-of-way/All original fenestration visible from the public right-of-way at the south and west sides of the building will be retained. Removal of the noted windows and door would not diminish the significance or integrity of the building. The two proposed pairs of French doors reference the lite patterns of windows at the projecting bay window at the southwest corner of the building, but are sufficiently differentiated due to their contemporary design and location at a rear deck.
The alterations to the garage would remove one original window and one original door and create new openings on the east elevation and at the east side of the north and south elevations. The portion of the garage which is proposed to be altered is minimally visible from the public right-of- way, and the changes would not diminish the building’s ability to contribute to the significance of the property. Proposed new windows at the garage would reference the divided-lite original windows at the property, but would be sufficiently differentiated from the old through their arched shape .
Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 9.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154
10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.
The proposed deck is located at the rear of the residence. If, hypothetically, removed in the future, the general form and integrity of the residence as viewed from the street would be unimpaired.
Thus, the proposed project is in compliance with Rehabilitation Standard 10.
Conclusion
As the above analysis demonstrates, the proposed project, as currently designed, complies with all ten of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4(b)(1), if a project complies with the Standards for Rehabilitation, the project’s impact “would generally be considered mitigated below a level of significance and thus is not significant.” Therefore, as currently designed, the proposed project would not result in project-specific impacts, and would not cause a substantial adverse change to the historical resource as defined by CEQA.
The project also meets the requirements of Section 36.54.90 of the City of Mountain View’s Code of Ordinances.
Qualifications
Page & Turnbull was established in 1973 as Charles Hall Page & Associates to provide architectural and conservation services for historic buildings, resources, and civic areas. The company was one of the first architecture firms in California to dedicate its practice to historic preservation and is among the longest practicing such firms in the country. Offices are located in Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Francisco, and San Jose, and staff includes licensed architects, designers, architectural historians, conservators, and planners. All of Page & Turnbull’s professional staff members meet or exceed the Secretary of the Interior’s Historic Preservation Professional Qualification Standards.
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 Appendix A – 2007 DPR Survey Form
2007 State of California Department of Parks & Recreation (DPR) 523 forms for 484 Loreto Street (Carey & Co., Inc, 2007)
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ; Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View Date: T ; R ; ¼ of ¼ of Sec ; M.D. B.M. c. Address: 484 Loreto Street City: Mountain View Zip: 94041 d. UTM: Zone: 10 ; mE/ mN (G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: Elevation:
Assessor Parcel Number: 158-30-060
*P3a. Description:
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2, Single-family property *P4. Resources Present: ;Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo:
View of the west façade; April 26, 2007
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
;Historic Prehistoric Both
1924; City Database
*P7. Owner and Address:
Carol and Ralph E. Pursifull, Jr.
484 Loreto Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Carey & Co., Inc.
460 Bush Street
San Francisco, CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
December 2007
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
P5a. Photo or Drawing
Located on a corner lot, this one-story, single-family home combines an eclectic mix of Mission and Classical Revival details.
It is rectangular in plan with an asphalt shingle-clad gable roof and stucco cladding. Multi-lite, wood-sash casement windows are predominate throughout. Decorative details include a Mission style, shaped archway and parapet leading to the covered front porch, which features red clay tile and glazed porcelain tile flooring. Dentils decorate the cornice on all street elevations and frame two gable pediments. One gable features cutaway corners with windows and molded brackets.
This parcel also includes a single-story, rectangular garage with a flat roof and stucco cladding.
*P11. Report Citation: Carey & Co. “Citywide Historic Properties Survey, Mountain View, California.” September 1, 2008.
*Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map ;Continuation Sheet ;Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other (List):
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 484 Loreto Street
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Single-family home B4. Present Use: Single-family home *B5. Architectural Style: Bungalow with Mission and Classical Revival elements *B6. Construction History: Constructed in 1924.
*B7. Moved? ;No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Palmita Park Subdivision
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Minton Lumber Co. *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1924 Property Type: Single-family property Applicable Criteria: C/3
This house was the first to be constructed in the Palmita Park subdivision, a residential neighborhood bounded by Bush, Dana, Calderon, and Velarde Streets developed over twenty years by the Minton Lumber Company, one of Mountain View’s pioneering businesses, and Bert Holeman (d. 1951), a Kansas native who arrived in Mountain View in 1912 and founded First National Bank, for which he served as president until 1925. In 1923 the Minton Company bought 9.5 acres fronting Calderon Avenue from W. A. Goodpasture and 4.5 acres fronting Bush Street from Holeman. The latter then collaborated with the lumber company to promote residential development on the combined 14 acres. Between 1924 and 1925, the developers graded, curbed, paved, and installed sewer, water, gas, electric, and telephones services for lots along the entire frontage on Bush and Loreto Streets as well Anza and Velarde Streets. A Mrs. C. E. Kunze won a contest to name the new subdivision, and a row of palm trees were planted along the entire frontage of Bush Street in honor of the subdivision’s name, Palmita Park. In 1926 Minton bought 15 more parcels from Holeman and developed another street.
Houses of many styles, including this Spanish-influenced residence, characterize the planned subdivision of Palmita Park.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
*B12. References:
See continuation sheet.
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Carey & Co., Inc.
*Date of Evaluation: December 2007
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Carey & Co., Inc. *Date: December 2007 ; Continuation Update
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
Continuation of B10. Significance:
The Minton Lumber Company, Mountain View’s “oldest continually operating commercial establishment” dates to 1911.
That year, Earl D. Minton traveled from Neligh, Nebraska to Mountain View where he purchased Parkinson Brothers Lumber & Hardware on Front Street (now Evelyn Avenue), a company that dated to 1897. Mountain View’s population counted about 1,000 residents in 1911, but grew steadily for the next thirty years and accelerated dramatically during the postwar era. The Lumber Company’s growth paralleled that of the city. Its investment in the Palmita Park subdivision both reflected and propelled future mayor Earl Minton’s vision for the potential growth of the city.
Alfred Olson (1889-1971) joined Minton Lumber Company as treasurer and member of the board of directors after World War I, when he had been a messmate with Earl Minton. He married Emily Luella Beystrom in 1923 and built their first home the following year. The house remained in the Olson family into the 1980s.
This house appears eligible for the NRHP/CRHR under Criteria C/3 as a significant example of architecture in planned communities of 1920s and 1930s America. These subdivisions typically featured a variety of styles while maintaining uniform building and lot sizes and building setbacks. This small-scale house blends several styles to create a picturesque effect with historical associations, demonstrating the era’s dominant architectural trends. However, the property does not appear to be eligible for the NRHP/CRHR under Criteria A/1, B/2, or D/4. It is not associated with persons, events, or broad patterns important to local, California, or National history, nor is it likely to yield information important to history or prehistory. It retains a high level of integrity, with a continuity of setting and no obvious exterior alterations.
Continuation of B12. References:
Gelernter, Mark. A History of American Architecture: Buildings in Their Cultural and Technological Context. New Haven, NH:
University Press of New England, 1999.
Mountain View Preservation Alliance. “Alfred and Emily Olsen House.” http://www.mv-pa.org/properties/484Loreto/ index.html (accessed August 15, 2007).
“Olsen, Afren and Emily.” Vertical Files, History Center, Mountain View Public Library.
“Our History.” Minton Lumber & Supply, http://www.mintonslumber.com/histmain.htm (accessed November 30, 2007).
Palmita Park. Vertical Files, History Center, Mountain View Public Library.
Perry, Nicholas. Mountain View. Images of America. San Francisco: Arcadia Press, 2006.
“Where did Palmita Park Get Its Street?” Mountain View Register-Leader. January 25, 1924.
Wright, Gwendolyn. Building the Dream: A Social History of American Housing. New York: Pantheon Books, 1981. 484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 Appendix B – 2025 DPR Survey Form
2025 State of California Department of Parks & Recreation (DPR) 523 forms for 484 Loreto Street (Page & Turnbull, 2025).
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 484 LORETO ST City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-2161 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15830060 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Mission Revival Plan Shape: Rectangle Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1
Roof Style: Compound Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Stucco Primary Door Material: Wood
Window Style: Bay Window, Double-Hung, Fixed Window Material: Wood Porch: Portico Garage: Detached Garage
Other Architectural/Site Features: Complex plan and massing with Mission Revival parapets and pedimented gables. Bay window with projecting eave and attached planting bed. 12-over-one double hung wood sash windows with ogee lugs. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present: ✓Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓Historic Prehistoric Both
1924; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
PURSIFULL RALPH E JR, 484 LORETO ST,
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments: NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓Continuation Sheet ✓Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 484 LORETO ST
B1. Historic Name: Alfred and Emily Olson House
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Mission Revival
*B6. Construction History: 484 Loreto Street was the first residence to be constructed in the Palmita Park Subdivision in 1924. It was built by Alfred Olson of the Minton Lumber Company, who was the first owner and occupant and an executive of the company.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Garage
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Minton Lumber Company; Alfred Olson *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1924 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: C/3 (Design) Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
484 Loreto Street is a Mission Revival style single-family residence located in Old Mountain View, associated with the theme of Residential Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. 484 Loreto Street was the first residence built in 1924 in the Palmita Park subdivision, which was planned and built by the Minton Lumber Company.
Palmita Park subdivision is a residential neighborhood bounded by Bush, Dana, and Velarde Streets and Calderon Avenue. It was developed over 20 years, beginning in 1924, by the Minton Lumber Company and Bert Holeman, a local businessman. The Minton Lumber Company was founded in 1911. Bert Holeman was a Kansas native who arrived in Mountain View in 1912. He founded the First National Bank in Mountain View, for which he served as president until 1925. In 1923, the Minton Lumber Company bought 9.5 acres fronting Calderon Avenue from W. A. Goodpasture and 4.5 acres fronting Bush Street from Bert Holeman. Holeman collaborated with the Minton Company to promote residential development on the combined 14 acres. A contest to name the new subdivision elicited the name Palmita Park; palm trees were planted along the Bush Street frontage in honor of the subdivision’s new name. In March 1924, Palmita Park was annexed to Mountain View. Between 1924 and 1925, the developers graded, curbed, paved, and installed sewer, water, gas, electric and telephone service for lots along the frontage on Bush, Loreto, Anza, and Velarde Streets. In 1926, the Minton Company added Westinghouse electroliers (streetlights) to the subdivision. Lots were sold only to buyers who, at the time of purchase, made a contract with the Minton Company for the construction of a home. The contract included the planting of lawns and shrubbery, and house sites were established with a common setback and uniform distance from lot lines. Construction started from Bush Street at Loreto and moved east toward Calderon Avenue. Advertisements in the Mountain View Register Leader in 1924 and 1925 suggest that some of the subdivision’s early houses were built on speculation by the Minton Company for immediate purchase while others were built according to the Minton company's plan books from which buyers could select a plan and style for customized construction.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
HP4. Ancillary building
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
The property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register. Property has an active Mills Act contract. Property was given a status code of 3S in the Carey & Co. survey (2008 Draft).
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
No major exterior alterations are noted.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The Palmita Park houses built in the 1920s exhibit the range of cottage and period revival styles popular in that decade; however, the Great Depression interrupted the full build-out of the subdivi sion. Houses from the late 1930s and the post-World War II building boom in the Minimal Traditional style appear to have filled out the remaining blocks. The house at 484 Loreto Street was built by Minton Lumber Company treasurer and Board of Directors member Alfred Olson, who owned and occupied the property with his wife Emily. The Olson family retained ownership through the 1980s.
484 Loreto Street appears eligibile for the National Register, California Register and Mountain View Register under Criterion C/3/c as a notable and first-in-the-development example of Mission Revival architecture buil t within the stylistically diverse Palmita Park subdivision during the 1920s. The property appears minimally altered and retains sufficient integrity for listing in the National Register and California Register. The period of significance is 1924, the year of construction.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall siting and scale, including historic setback
Complex plan and massing
Stucco cladding
Mission Revival parapets and pedimented gables
Cornice with dentils
Entry portico with arched openings
Bay window with projecting eave
Attached planting bed
12-over-one double-hung wood sash windows with ogee lugs Detached garage with shaped parapet and wing walls, and paired side-hinge doors.
Continuation of B12. References:
"Boom makes rapid progress in Palmita Park," Mountain View Register, May 1, 1925.
Carey & Co. Inc, "Citywide Historic Properties Survey Mountain View, California." Vols. I and II. Prepared for City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008.
Ignoffo, Mary Jo. "Milestones: A History of Mountain View, California." Cupertino, CA: California History Center, 2002.
Kayne, Melanie and Kyle Hartzell. "Palmita Park: Clippings that reveal the rich history of home." Self-published, 2024.
Perry, Nicholas. "Mountain View." Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing, 2006.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
484 Loreto Street, Mountain View – SOIS Compliance Analysis [25066]
PAGE & TURNBULL 170 MAIDEN LANE, 5TH FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94108 TEL 415-362-5154 Appendix C – Proposed Project Drawing Set
Proposed project drawings for 484 Loreto Street, “484 Loreto St” prepared by Oasis Home Design Studio, dated July 22, 2025.
1 (E) BASEMENT /FAMILY ROOM37"52"
9'-6" 3'
19'-6"
6'-4"
(E) BASEMENT SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
12'-3"
4'-3"17'-11"
1234567891011121314
5'-5"5'-1"
(E) W01 30-36EGRESS WINDOW
(E)4x10 FLUSH BEAM(E)4x10 FLUSH BEAM
(E)4x10 FLUSH BEAM(E)7x9 14" FLUSH BEAM
(E)4x10 FLUSH BEAM
(E) FLUSH STL.BEAM 8X40 / PERSTRUCTURAL PLANS
15' SIDE CORNER5' INTERIOR SIDE SET BACK
20' FRONT SET BACK
4'-7"6'-8"1'
(N) 3 12" x 9 14"
(N) 3 12" x 9 14"
1' 4'-7"
2"
33"12" 165"
(E) BEDROOM 2
(E) MASTER BEDROOM(E) KITCHEN
(E) DINING ROOM
(E) LIVING ROOM
(E) FOYER
(E) GARAGE 243 SF
9'-114" 3'-614" 6'-112"
6'-312"
5'-6"1'-514"1'-4"2'-1134"2'-6"2'-8"914"5'-6"3'-714" 5'-9"7'-6"9'-1012" 2'-8" 8" 9'-914"3'-614"
3'-8"6' 4'-334"
(E) MASTERBATH
(E) BATH
2'-4"2'-412"
9'-8"32"60"
21"72"4058"
(E)ATTIC ACCESS
2'-1"4'-2"
DWSINK REF
RANGEHOOD
24"
39"24"
39"24"
16'-914"21"21"
7314"24"
24"11'-414"24"24"33"24"27"
30"
132"
21'-014"
6'-312"
3'-5"3'-612"
11'-2"
(E)LAUNDRY
9'-714"
3'
4'-712"
614" 614"
1'-1012"
LINEN CLOSETD05 30 30
5'-9"5'-3"
7'-614"
4'-6"10'-1114"
8'6" TO PROPERTY LINE
2'-4"4'-2"
1114"512"1'
13'-312"
32"44"36"
9"4"
13'-312"
D02 24 68POCKET DOOR
48"21"
912"
(E)ATTIC ACCESS
4'-014"
36"
30"36"33"
2'-412"5114"12" SHOWERBENCH16X24”18”HIGH
3'
MW
(E) CLOSET (E) CLOSET
(E) FRONT PORCH
(E)ELECTRIC PANEL 200 AMP(E)BOSCH BOVA SPLIT SYSTEM HEATPUMP 12'-9"
9'56'-5"
16'-10"8'-5"
42'-5"
53' PROPERTY LINE
100' PROPERTY LINE
25'BUSH STREET
LORETO STREETCENTER LINECENTER LINE
5'-6"6'-6"13'
484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041(E) SITE PLAN / FLOOR PLANSC: 18" = 1' 15' SIDE CORNER SET BACK5' INTERIOR SIDE SET BACK
20' FRONT SET BACK
11 1
OLIVE TREE EXISTING
STANDARD GREENLAWN PLANNED
EXISTING JACARANDA TREEEXISTING LEMON TREE
HERBS LAVENDERPLANNED
EXISTING FEIJOABUSHCITY TREE(CRAPE MYRTLE)
5'-9"5'-3"
8'6" TO PROPERTY LINE13'-312" TOPROPERTY LINE
10'-2" TO PROPERTY LINE15'-312" TO PROPERTY LINE11'-5" TO PROPERTY LINE 24'-512" TO PROPERTY LINE
19'-634" TO PROPERTY LINE20'13'-514" TO PROPERTY LINE
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE
16'-612" TO PROPERTY LINE
25'-912" TO PROPERTY LINE
31'-1034" TO PROPERTY LINE
11' 18'-014" TO PROPERTY LINE
5'
PAVED
STANDARD GREENLAWN PLANNED
STANDARD GREENLAWN PLANNED
STANDARD GREENLAWN PLANNED
(E) FENCE
(E)EXTERIORPRIVACY WALLS
1 1 (E) CLEAN OUT
(E) CLEAN OUT
(E) SEWER LINE (E) SEWER LINE
(E) 4 " SEWER LINE
7' EASEMENT
1 1
CURB OPENING19'-7" DOUBLE DRIVEWAY CURB OPENING
SLOPE 14" TO 12"
5'-214"
(E)SUPER HIGHEFFICIENCY PLUS 11GPM RESIDENTIAL199,000 BTU NATURALGAS EXTERIORTANKLESS WATERHEATER 12'-214"
20'
8'
12'-214"
(E) W01 30-36EGRESS WINDOW
2'-334" TO PROPERTY LINE18'-10"
8'-1"17'-812" TO PROPERTY LINE
31'-1014" TO PROPERTY LINE
12'-1"
6'-1"
SCOPE OF WORK / PROJECT STATEMENT-THE PROPOSED ALTERATION REQUIRES A HISTORIC PRESERVATION PERMIT-THE PROPERTY OWNERS, XINNING HO AND MARTIN BETTGE, ARE PROPOSING TOINVOLVE MINIMALLY VISIBLE ALTERATIONS TO THIS HISTORIC MOUNTAIN VIEWRESIDENCE (“OLSON HOUSE, 1924”) AND ITS DETACHED GARAGE.-THE PROPERTY OWNERS ENGAGED THE ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSERVATIONSERVICES TEAM AT PAGE&TURNBULL TO ASSESS THE PROPERTY AND THEPROPOSED EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS.-ACCORDING TO THE HISTORIC ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM OF THEPROFESSIONAL STAFF, THE PROJECT AS CURRENTLY DESIGNED WILL NOTALTER THE CHARACTER- DEFINING DISTINCTIVE BUSH/LORETO STREETFAÇADES,-THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ALL TEN OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’SSTANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION, AND IS NOT EXPECTED TO RESULT INPROJECT-SPECIFIC IMPACTS OR CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE CHANGE TOTHE HISTORICAL RESOURCE-ALL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT(CEQA).THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS ILLUSTRATED IN THIS SET AND INCLUDES THE FOLLOWINGSPECIFIC ALTERATIONS, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’SSTANDARDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HISTORIC \PROPERTIES / SPECIFICALLY, THE STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATIONEXTERIOR ALTERATIONSNEW OUTDOOR DECK AND STAIRS TO THE BACKYARD:-REPLACEMENT OF THE AGING, UTILITARIAN WOOD STAIRCASE AT THENORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING WITH AN EXPANDED AND MOREACCESSIBLE WOOD DECK, EXTENDING ALONG THE EAST (LEFT) SIDE OF THENORTH ELEVATION.-ATTACHED A NEW LEDGER TO (E) STUCCO WALL / STUCCO PATCH / TYP-ADD FLASHING TO FRAMING AND Z FLASHING OVER PT LEDGER / 2 LAYERS OFBUILDING PAPER OVER FLASHING / DECK LEDGER / TYP-OVERALL EXTERIOR ACCESSORY FRAMING / NOT THE BE ATTACHEDTO (E) STUCCO WALL / ONLY AT LEDGER / ½” GAP / TYPNEW KITCHEN FRENCH DOOR - 60 68 - OUTSWING DOORNEW MASTER BEDROOM FRENCH DOOR - 60 68 - OUTSWING DOOR-INSTALLATION OF TRADITIONAL YET DURABLE WOOD-CLAD DOUBLE OUTSWINGDOORS WITH AUTHENTICALLY DIVIDED LITES-FRENCH DOORS BY PELLA TRADITIONAL RESERVE, MARVIN ULTIMATE WOOD, ORSIMILAR, ARE DESIGNED TO VISUALLY OPEN UP THE INSIDE OF THE MASTERBEDROOM AND KITCHEN WHILE CONNECTING THESE INTERIOR SPACES TO THEREAR OUTDOOR AREAS, INCLUDING THE WOOD DECK.REMODEL (E) GARAGE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE-REMODEL (E) GARAGE - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE / TO REPAIR AND CREATE AVERSATILE SPACE WHILE MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE TO - THE SECRETARY OFINTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION - PER PLANS.-THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE SHALL NOT BE CHANGED.GENERAL NOTE - CONSTRUCTION AND ATTACHING ELEMENTS INTO THE (E) HOME-PRIORITIZE PRESERVING ORIGINAL FEATURES AND SURFACE DETAILING.-MINIMIZE MATERIAL LOSS AND DAMAGE DURING INSTALLATION. 484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060
PROJECT INFORMATION:HOME OWNER(S): MARTIN BETTGE & XINNIN HOPROJECT ADDRESS: 484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041PHONE NUMBER: MARTIN: 408-768-5002, XINNING 669-243-5536EMAIL: [email protected] / [email protected] DESIGNERCONTACT NAME DANIEL FONSECACOMPANY NAME OASIS HOME DESIGNPHONE (510) 4188340EMAIL [email protected] ENGINEERCONTACT NAME EVERLISTO QUEBRAL, S.E.COMPANY NAME EQ ENGINEERINGPHONE NUMBER (408) 229 3517EMAIL [email protected] CONSULTANTSECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION ANALYSISCONTACT NAME CHRISTINA DIKAS PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE WALKER SHORES ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN CULTURAL RESOURCES PLANNER STACY KOZAKAVICH CULTURAL RESOURCESCOUNTY & CITY CONTACT INFORMATIONMOUNTAIN VIEWCOUNTY WEBSITE: HTTPS://WWW.MOUNTAINVIEW.GOV/DEFAULT.ASPADDRESS: 500 CASTRO STREET, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041BUILDING EMAIL: [email protected]: (650) 903-6313PLANNING DIVISION BY PHONE AT 650-903-6306 OR BY EMAIL [email protected] STAFF TEAM:HANG ZHOU, [email protected] / 650-903-6306 ASSOCIATE PLANNER / CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEWAPPLICABLE CODE EDITION20222022 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE2022 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC)2022 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE2022 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE (CPC)2022 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)2022 GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE2022 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (T-24)PROJECT DATA & CODE RESEARCH:PROJECT ADDRESS:484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041ONE-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING BUILT IN 1924HISTORICAL STATUSCURRENTLY LISTED ON THE MOUNTAIN VIEW REGISTER OF HISTORIC RESOURCES.PREVIOUSLY FOUND ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING ON THE CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICALRESOURCES (CALIFORNIA REGISTER) AND NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES (NATIONALREGISTER).APN 15830060MAIN HOME BEDROOMS & BATHROOMS 2 BED / 2 BATHPARKING GARAGE - DETACHEDZONING AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION RESIDENTIAL BUILDING - R 1 ZONE(E)PROJECT AREAS SCHEDULE:LOT SIZE 5300 SFMAIN HOME TOTAL INTERIOR LIVABLE 1265 SF(E) FINISH BASEMENT / FAMILY ROOM 556 SF(E)FRONT PORCH 195 SF(E)DETACHED GARAGE 243 SFR1 ZONING DISTRICT REQUIRES FIFTY PERCENT OF THE FRONT SETBACK AREA TO BE PERMANENTLYLANDSCAPED
GENERAL LOCATION
PARCEL MAP
INDEX:A1 (E) FLOOR PLAN / PROJECT DATE CODE RESEARCH / SCOPE OF WORKA2 SITE PLAN / LANDSCAPED AREAS / AREAS OF WORKA3 (E) ELEVATIONS & BUILDING MATERIALA4 (E) SECTION DRAWINGSA5 (P) CONSTRUCTION PLANA6 (E) & (P) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA7 (N) SHED *THE STAMPING OF THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS IS NOT ANAPPROVAL TO VIOLATE ANY CITY POLICY OR ORDINANCE, COUNTY,STATE OR FEDERAL LAW.*THE ORIGINAL JOB CARD AND APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANSMUST BE ONSITE AT TIME OF EACH INSPECTION. THECONTRACTOR MUST BE PRESENT AT TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION.GENERAL NOTES*TO OBTAIN DEBRIS BOXES, PLEASE CONTACT RECOLOGYMOUNTAIN VIEW AT (650) 967-3034, OR THE CITY OF MOUNTAINVIEW PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR REQUIREMENTS AT (650)903-6311. i.OCCUPANCY R-3ii.DESCRIPTION OF USE SINGLE FAMILY USE RESIDENTIALiii.TYPE V-B WOOD FRAME CONSTRUCTIONiv.SPRINKLERS NOv.STORIES 1vi.HEIGHT 15’vii.INDICATE IF THE HOUSE HAS AC OR NOT NO AC (E) BUILDING SPECS AND MATERIALS:ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION / BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF HOME STYLECLASSICAL REVIVAL AND MISSION REVIVAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLESPER / SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATIONANALYSIS- 484 LORETO STREET INCLUDES A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A DETACHEDGARAGE.- LOCATED IN PALMITA PARK AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTIONFORMED BY BUSH STREET AND LORETO STREET- THE RESIDENCE IS GENERALLY RECTANGULAR-SHAPED IN PLAN, SET ON ACONCRETE FOUNDATION, AND CLAD IN STUCCO.- THE BUILDING IS CAPPED WITH A LOW-PITCHED CROSS-GABLE ROOF CLAD INASPHALT SHINGLES WITH PEDIMENTED GABLES AT THE WEST ELEVATION- DENTILS LINE THE CORNICE ON THE SOUTH, WEST, AND NORTH ELEVATIONSAND FRAME BOTH PEDIMENTS.- THE SOUTH (PRIMARY) FAÇADE FEATURES A PROMINENT MISSION REVIVALSTYLE SHAPED ARCHWAY AND PARAPET THAT LEADS TO THE COVERED FRONTPORCH.- THE GABLE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER FEATURES CUTAWAY CORNERS WITHMOLDED BRACKETS AND DOWNWARD FINIALS.- STUCCO CLADDING AND A STUCCO EXTERNAL CHIMNEY IS LOCATED ON THEPRIMARY FAÇADE.- TYPICAL WINDOWS ARE WOOD-FRAME DOUBLE-HUNG DIVIDED-LITE WINDOWS.- MISSION REVIVAL PARAPETS AND PEDIMENTED GABLES- CORNICE WITH DENTILS- ENTRY PORTICO WITH ARCHED OPENING- BAY WINDOW WITH PROJECTING EAVE- CUTAWAY CORNERS AND MOLDED BRACKETS WITH DOWNWARD FINIALS AT THESOUTHWEST CORNER- ATTACHED PLANTING BED- 12-OVER-ONE DOUBLE-HUNG WOOD SASH WINDOWS WITH OGEE LUGS, WHEREPRESENT- DETACHED GARAGE WITH SHAPED PARAPET AND WING WALLS, DENTILS,PEDIMENTED CORNICE, AND PAIRED SIDE-HINGE DOOREXTERIOR BUILDING SURFACES / INCLUDING ROOF AND FACADE:- ELEVATION DRAWING TO REFLECT THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS OF THEBUILDINGS ACCURATELYCLASSICAL REVIVAL AND MISSION REVIVAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLES- TO INCLUDE DIMENSIONED LENGTH, DEPTH, AND WIDTH- ALL NEW FINISHES TO MAINTAIN (E) COLORS AND MATERIALS OF THE HOUSE SCALEDATESHEET:
PERSHEET
03-26-25
REVISIONS:________________________________________________________________________________________________ HOME OWNER(S):MARTIN & XINNIN484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060 OASIS HOMEDESIGN STUDIODANIEL [email protected] A1(E) FLOOR PLAN/ PROJECT DATE /CODE RESEARCHSCOPE OF WORK 106-06-25
1 207-22-25
1 1
1 1
(E) FRONT PORCH (E) CLOSET (E) CLOSET
(E) BATH
(E) MASTERBATH
(E) FOYER
(E) LIVING ROOM
(E) DINING ROOM
(E) KITCHEN
(E) MASTER BEDROOM
(E) BEDROOM 2
CENTER LINE STREET
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
DRIVEWAY14'-7"DOUBLE DRIVEWAY WIDTH16 FT MIN - 20 FT MAX SLOPE 14" TO 12"
1'-6"6"2'-6"
19'-7" DOUBLE DRIVEWAY CURB OPENING
CURB OPENING
1'-6"6"
2'-6"
5'-6" SIDE WALK
6'-6" ROW LAND SCAPING
62' RIGHT OF WAY38' STREET
5'-6" SIDE WALK6'-6" ROW LAND SCAPING
5'-6" SIDE WALK6'-6" ROW LAND SCAPING
62' RIGHT OF WAYPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
CENTER LINE STREET38' STREET
5'-6" SIDE WALK6'-6" ROW LAND SCAPING
ROW LAND SCAPING
ROW LAND SCAPING
ROW LAND SCAPING
SIDE WALK
SIDE WALK
SIDE WALK
SIDE WALK
SIDE WALK
SIDE WALK
SIDE WALK
BUSH STREET
5'
18'-014" TO PROPERTY LINE
5'-3"
11'
31'-1034" TO PROPERTY LINE
2'-334" TO PROPERTY LINE
25'-912" TO PROPERTY LINE
16'-612" TO PROPERTY LINE
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE
13'-514" TO PROPERTY LINE
20'
19'-634" TO PROPERTY LINE
24'-512" TO PROPERTY LINE
11'-5" TO PROPERTY LINE15'-312" TO PROPERTY LINE10'-2" TO PROPERTY LINE 13'-312" TO PROPERTYLINE (E)PATIO DECK TO BE REMOVE(E)DOOR & WINDOW TO BEREMOVE (E)WINDOW TO BE REMOVE
REMODEL (E) GARAGEACCESSORY STRUCTURETO RESEMBLE THEARCHITECTURAL STYLE ANDDETAILS OF THE MAIN HOME ANDHISTORICAL PERIOD 243 SF(E) GARAGE 20' FRONT SET BACK
5' INTERIOR SIDE SET BACK
15' SIDE CORNER SET BACK
484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041(E) SITE PLAN / FLOOR PLANSC:316" = 1'CENTER LINECENTER LINELORETO STREET
BUSH STREET
100' PROPERTY LINE
53' PROPERTY LINE
42'-5"
8'-5"
16'-10"
58'-11"
9'
12'-9"
(E)BOSCH BOVA SPLIT SYSTEM HEATPUMP(E)ELECTRIC PANEL 200 AMP (E) FRONT PORCH
8'6" TO PROPERTY LINE
5'-3"
5'-9"
9'-714"
(E) EXTERIORTANKLESS WATERHEATER
2 18'-10"
8'-1"
17'-812" TO PROPERTY LINE
31'-1014" TO PROPERTY LINE
12'-1"
6'-1"
GENERAL LOCATION
AERIAL VIEW
484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060
PARCEL MAP
(E)FRONT PORCH
(E) CONDITIONED SPACE
(E) PATIO DECKEXISTING STRUCTURES
(E) DETACHED GARAGE50% OF THE REQUIRED FRONT SETBACK AREA SHALL BEPERMANENTLY LANDSCAPED.(E) FRONT YARD AREA 1294 SF(E) LANDSCAPING 1121 SF = 86 % SCALEDATESHEET:
PERSHEET
03-26-25
REVISIONS:________________________________________________________________________________________________ HOME OWNER(S):MARTIN & XINNIN484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060 OASIS HOMEDESIGN STUDIODANIEL [email protected] A2SITE PLAN
106-06-25
1 207-22-25
8'-4"2'-6" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
2'-6" GRADE TO FINISH FLOOR
5'-112"
CEILING HEIGHT
INTERIOR FLOOR
ROOF8'-4"2'-6" 5'-2"
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
2'-6" GRADE TOFINISH FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT
ROOF8'-4"2'-6" 5'-2"
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
8'-4"1'-9" 5'-2"
5'-112"
8'-4"1'-9" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
ROOF2'-9"
ROOF2'-9"
6'
2' 4'-5"
15'-10"
3'-6"
9'-934"
12'-4"5'-012"9'-934"
7'-014"
6'-1"
5'-10"
5'-3"1'-314" 4'-334"
7'
1'-3"7'-1"1'-9" 1'-3"40'-614"
2'-6"
4'-6"
2'-6"4'-6"
6'-11"
3'-6"
2'-6"4'-6"
6"2'-6" 2'-10"6'-11"
3'-8"
3'
2' 4'
5'-6"
8'-6" 13'-034"9'-714"6'-1"
6'-612"
6'-1"
8'-4"1'-9" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL9'-10"
6'-334"
7'5'-1034"
38'-334" 5'-9"5'-6"
1'-4"2'2'-6"
3'2'-4"2'-4"
4'-6"
8"1'-4"2'
8'-4"1'-9" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
2'-9"ROOF
8'-4"5'-2"
1'-9" GRADE TO FINISH FLOOR2'-6" GRADE TOFINISH FLOOR
1'-4"4'-4"5'-6"4'-4"21'-014"
15'-10"
2'-3"
12'-10"
1'-834"
2'-4"8"2'-4"
4'
2'-6"2'-6"
2'-10"
1112" 2' 3'-6"2'5" 5"
4'-4"
3'-6"6'
5'-1"
5'-014"
CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
CEILING HEIGHT
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
(E) NORTH ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
(E) SOUTH ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
(E) WEST ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
(E) EAST ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
13'-312" 4'-4"3'-5"
(E) BASEMENT / FAMILY ROOM /PROJECTION
8'-4" CEILING HEIGHT10'-912"
12'-214"
PROPERTY LINE
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE
12'-214"8'
PROPERTY LINE
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE
(E)PATIO DECK
THE WEST ELEVATION OF THEGARAGE SHALL NOT BECHANGED
EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN TRIMSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
WINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
CORNICEMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
EXTERIOR STAIR MATERIAL:WOOD NATURAL - SEALED
ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLADGABLE VENTMATERIAL: ALUMINUMFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN WINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITETRIMSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLADCHIMNEYMATERIAL:STUCCOFINISH:TEXTURECOLOR: BEIGE / TANN EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLADEXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN TRIMSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
WINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLAD
TRIMSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITEWINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE (E) DOWNSPOUT(E) CRAWLSPACE VENTILATION
(E) CRAWLSPACE VENT
(E) DOWNSPOUT
(E) DOWNSPOUT(E) DOWNSPOUT
(E) CRAWLSPACE VENT(E) DOWNSPOUT
HISTORIC COOLER VENTSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE 10'-1012"
2 8'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT10'-3"
1 10'-212"8'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT9'-612"
21 10'-1012"
28'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT10'-3"
1 7'-934" WALL PLATE HEIGHT2% SLOPE
2% SLOPE 2% SLOPE
2% SLOPE2% SLOPE
2% SLOPE 2% SLOPE
GRADE2% SLOPE
16'-1" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
10'-212"8'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT
15'-11" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
15'-11" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
15'-11" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
16'-2" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 08'-4" CEILING HEIGHT10'-912"7'-934" WALL PLATE HEIGHTGRADE 2 2
2 2
2 2
1 (E)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS1(E) FENCE1
(E) FENCE1
(E) BUILDING SPECS AND MATERIALS:ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION / BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF HOME STYLECLASSICAL REVIVAL AND MISSION REVIVAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLESPER / SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATIONANALYSIS- 484 LORETO STREET INCLUDES A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A DETACHEDGARAGE.- LOCATED IN PALMITA PARK AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTIONFORMED BY BUSH STREET AND LORETO STREET- THE RESIDENCE IS GENERALLY RECTANGULAR-SHAPED IN PLAN, SET ON ACONCRETE FOUNDATION, AND CLAD IN STUCCO.- THE BUILDING IS CAPPED WITH A LOW-PITCHED CROSS-GABLE ROOF CLAD INASPHALT SHINGLES WITH PEDIMENTED GABLES AT THE WEST ELEVATION- DENTILS LINE THE CORNICE ON THE SOUTH, WEST, AND NORTH ELEVATIONSAND FRAME BOTH PEDIMENTS.- THE SOUTH (PRIMARY) FAÇADE FEATURES A PROMINENT MISSION REVIVALSTYLE SHAPED ARCHWAY AND PARAPET THAT LEADS TO THE COVERED FRONTPORCH.- THE GABLE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER FEATURES CUTAWAY CORNERS WITHMOLDED BRACKETS AND DOWNWARD FINIALS.- STUCCO CLADDING AND A STUCCO EXTERNAL CHIMNEY IS LOCATED ON THEPRIMARY FAÇADE.- TYPICAL WINDOWS ARE WOOD-FRAME DOUBLE-HUNG DIVIDED-LITE WINDOWS.- MISSION REVIVAL PARAPETS AND PEDIMENTED GABLES- CORNICE WITH DENTILS- ENTRY PORTICO WITH ARCHED OPENING- BAY WINDOW WITH PROJECTING EAVE- CUTAWAY CORNERS AND MOLDED BRACKETS WITH DOWNWARD FINIALS AT THESOUTHWEST CORNER- ATTACHED PLANTING BED- 12-OVER-ONE DOUBLE-HUNG WOOD SASH WINDOWS WITH OGEE LUGS, WHEREPRESENT- DETACHED GARAGE WITH SHAPED PARAPET AND WING WALLS, DENTILS,PEDIMENTED CORNICE, AND PAIRED SIDE-HINGE DOOREXTERIOR BUILDING SURFACES / INCLUDING ROOF AND FACADE:- ELEVATION DRAWING TO REFLECT THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS OF THEBUILDINGS ACCURATELYCLASSICAL REVIVAL AND MISSION REVIVAL ARCHITECTURAL STYLES- TO INCLUDE DIMENSIONED LENGTH, DEPTH, AND WIDTH- ALL NEW FINISHES TO MAINTAIN (E) COLORS AND MATERIALS OF THE HOUSE
TYPEMATERIALFINISHCOLORNOTES
SCALEDATESHEET:
PERSHEET
REVISIONS:________________________________________________________________________________________________ OASIS HOMEDESIGN STUDIODANIEL [email protected] A3(E) ELEVATIONS
03-26-25
HOME OWNER(S):MARTIN & XINNIN484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060 106-06-25
1 1
207-22-25
(E) KITCHEN(E) LIVING ROOM
(E) BASEMENT / FAMILY ROOM
(E) KITCHEN
8'-4"5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
INTERIOR FLOOR
ROOF
CEILING HEIGHT
INTERIOR FLOOR
ROOF8'-4"5'-2"
BASEMENT
CEILING HEIGHT
INTERIOR FLOOR
ROOF8'-4"5'-2"
8'-4"5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
INTERIOR FLOOR
ROOF
PROPERTY LINE 2'-6" GRADE TO FINISH FLOOR
8"
8'-9"
CEILING HEIGHT
BASEMENT
8'-9"
CEILING HEIGHT
BASEMENT
8'-9"
CEILING HEIGHT
(E) SECTION DRAWINGS (A'-A")SC: 1/4" =1'
(E) SECTION DRAWINGS (B'-B")SC: 1/4" =1'
734"
1234567891011121314
8'-9"
BASEMENT
CEILING HEIGHT
(E) BASEMENT / FAMILY ROOM
16'-7" TO PROPERTY LINE
13'-5" TO PROPERTY LINE
8'6" TO PROPERTY LINE(E) BOSCH BVA SERIES AIRHANDLER2-3-4-5 TON CAPACITYR410A (E)CEILING HEIGHT/BASEMENT 8' 9"
7'-512" HEADROOM
(E) STARIS SECTION / BASEMENT SC: 1/4" =1'
7'-8" HEADROOM
1'-9" GRADE TO FINISH FLOOR
10'-1012"
2 8'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT9'-5"
1 5'-112"10'-1012"
28'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT10'-3"
1 2% SLOPE2% SLOPE
2% SLOPE2% SLOPE
16'-2" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 02
1 16'-2" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 02
1 SCALEDATESHEET:
PERSHEET
REVISIONS:________________________________________________________________________________________________ OASIS HOMEDESIGN STUDIODANIEL [email protected] A4(E) SECTION
03-26-25484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060 HOME OWNER(S):MARTIN & XINNIN
106-06-25207-22-25
(E) FRONT PORCH (E) CLOSET (E) CLOSET
(E) BATH
(E) MASTERBATH
(E) FOYER
(E) LIVING ROOM
(E) DINING ROOM
(E) KITCHEN(E) MASTER BEDROOM
(E) BEDROOM 2
4'-2"
"REMODEL (E) GARAGE ACCESSORYSTRUCTURE TO REPAIR AND CREATE AVERSATILE SPACE WHILE MAINTAININGCOMPLIANCE TO THE SECRETARY OF THEINTERIOR'S STANDARDS FORREHABILITATION / PER PLANS. THE WESTELEVATION OF THE GARAGE SHALL NOTBE CHANGED. 9"
(P) CONSTRUCTION PLANSCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"
(E)WINDOW TO BE REMOVE(E)DOOR & WINDOW TO BEREMOVE
(E)PATIO DECK TO BE REMOVE
(E)DOOR TO BE REMOVE(N)WINDOW
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINE
(N)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS
SCOPE OF WORK / PROJECT STATEMENTTHE PROPERTY OWNERS, XINNING HO AND MARTIN BETTGE, ARE PROPOSINGTO INVOLVE MINIMALLY VISIBLE ALTERATIONS TO THIS HISTORIC MOUNTAINVIEW RESIDENCE (“OLSON HOUSE, 1924”) AND ITS DETACHED GARAGE.THE PROPERTY OWNERS ENGAGED THE ARCHITECTURAL AND CONSERVATIONSERVICES TEAM AT PAGE&TURNBULL TO ASSESS THE PROPERTY AND THEPROPOSED EXTERIOR ALTERATIONS.ACCORDING TO THE HISTORIC ASSESSMENT MEMORANDUM OF THEPROFESSIONAL STAFF, THE PROJECT AS CURRENTLY DESIGNED WILL NOTALTER THE CHARACTER- DEFINING DISTINCTIVE BUSH/LORETO STREETFAÇADES,THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH ALL TEN OF THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’SSTANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION, AND IS NOT EXPECTED TO RESULT INPROJECT-SPECIFIC IMPACTS OR CAUSE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE CHANGE TOTHE HISTORICAL RESOURCEALL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT(CEQA).THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS ILLUSTRATED IN THIS SET AND INCLUDES THEFOLLOWING SPECIFIC ALTERATIONS, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SECRETARY OFTHE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF HISTORIC \PROPERTIES / SPECIFICALLY, THE STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATIONEXTERIOR ALTERATIONSNEW OUTDOOR DECK AND STAIRS TO THE BACKYARD:-REPLACEMENT OF THE AGING, UTILITARIAN WOOD STAIRCASE AT THENORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING WITH AN EXPANDED AND MOREACCESSIBLE WOOD DECK, EXTENDING ALONG THE EAST (LEFT) SIDE OFTHE NORTH ELEVATION.-ATTACHED A NEW LEDGER TO (E) STUCCO WALL / STUCCO PATCH / TYP-ADD FLASHING TO FRAMING AND Z FLASHING OVER PT LEDGER / 2LAYERS OF BUILDING PAPER OVER FLASHING / DECK LEDGER / TYP-OVERALL EXTERIOR ACCESSORY FRAMING / NOT THE BE ATTACHEDTO (E) STUCCO WALL / ONLY AT LEDGER / ½” GAP / TYPNEW KITCHEN FRENCH DOOR - 60 68 - OUTSWING DOORNEW MASTER BEDROOM FRENCH DOOR - 60 68 - OUTSWING DOOR-INSTALLATION OF TRADITIONAL YET DURABLE WOOD-CLAD DOUBLEOUTSWING DOORS WITH AUTHENTICALLY DIVIDED LITES-FRENCH DOORS BY PELLA TRADITIONAL RESERVE, MARVIN ULTIMATEWOOD, OR SIMILAR, ARE DESIGNED TO VISUALLY OPEN UP THE INSIDE OFTHE MASTER BEDROOM AND KITCHEN WHILE CONNECTING THESEINTERIOR SPACES TO THE REAR OUTDOOR AREAS, INCLUDING THEWOOD DECK.REMODEL (E) GARAGE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE-REMODEL (E) GARAGE - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE / TO REPAIR ANDCREATE A VERSATILE SPACE WHILE MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE TO - THESECRETARY OF INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION - PERPLANS.-THE WEST ELEVATION OF THE GARAGE SHALL NOT BE CHANGED.GENERAL NOTE - CONSTRUCTION AND ATTACHING ELEMENTS INTO THE (E)HOME-PRIORITIZE PRESERVING ORIGINAL FEATURES AND SURFACE DETAILING.-MINIMIZE MATERIAL LOSS AND DAMAGE DURING INSTALLATION.
TYPEMATERIALFINISHCOLORNOTES
(E)WALL TO REMIAN
(E)WALL TO BE REMOVE
(N) WALLSLEGENDS :
(E) DECK TO BE REMOVE
SCALEDATESHEET:
PERSHEET
REVISIONS:________________________________________________________________________________________________ OASIS HOMEDESIGN STUDIODANIEL [email protected] A5CONSTRUCTION PLAN
03-26-25484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060 HOME OWNER(S):MARTIN & XINNIN1
207-22-25106-06-25
3'-734" 6' 3'-734"
5'-9"5'-3"5'-9"
8'-412" TO PROPERTY LINE21'-1034"
4'-9"11'-11"
4'-614"
(N)FRENCH DOOR 60 68
38' PROPERTY LINE
23'-7" PROPERTY LINE85' PROPERTY LINE
(E)ELECTRIC PANEL 200 AMP
BEDROOM 2
(E) MASTER BEDROOM(E) KITCHEN
72"x80"
(E) DINING ROOM
(E) LIVING ROOM
(E) FOYER70"x66"h: 2' 0"
(E) MASTERBATH
(E) BATH
8'-834"TO PROPERTY LINE
4 (E) SITE PLAN & (N) FLOOR PLAN SC: 1/8" =1'
(E)BOSCH BOVA SPLIT SYSTEM HEATPUMP
12'-214"
6'10'-514"(N)FRENCH DOOR 60 68
4'-434"10'-1014"
112'-9"
11'-6"14'-7"58'-11"
16'-10"8'-5"
42'-5"
53' PROPERTY LINE
100' PROPERTY LINE
25'BUSH STREET
LORETO STREETCENTER LINECENTER LINE
5'-6"6'-6"13'
(N) STAIRS FROM BACK BEDROOM ANDKITCHEN INTO PATIO / PER CODE ANDSTRUCTURAL ENGINEER DETAILS / TOMATCH (E) HISTORIAL CRITERIA 15' SIDE CORNER SET BACK
5' INTERIOR SIDE SET BACK
20' FRONT SET BACK
1 11 PAVED
STANDARD GREENLAWN PLANNED
OLIVE TREE EXISTING
STANDARD GREENLAWN PLANNED
STANDARD GREENLAWN PLANNED
EXISTING JACARANDA TREEEXISTING LEMON TREE
HERBS LAVENDERPLANNED
EXISTING FEIJOABUSHCITY TREE(CRAPE MYRTLE)
PAVED PAVED
PAVED
IN PLANTER BEDS / HERBS
1 CURB OPENING19'-7" DOUBLE DRIVEWAY CURB OPENING
SLOPE 14" TO 12"
(E) EXTERIORTANKLESS WATERHEATER
3'-2"4'-3"3'-434"
(N) SHED
3'3' 3'-6"3'
2'-5"3'11'-7"
12'-214"8'1'-8"11'-2" 2'-3"16'-5"
10"1'-4"
20'
3'2'-5"3'11'-7"11'-2"15'-11"20'
1'-8"
12'-214"
3'-1034"
1'-4"
2'-3"3'-1034"
(N)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS2
12'-1" 7'-8"3'-012"12' 5'-334"
6'-8"
3'
(E) W01 30-36EGRESS WINDOW
2'-334" TO PROPERTY LINE18'-10"
8'-1"17'-812" TO PROPERTY LINE
31'-1014" TO PROPERTY LINE
12'-1"
6'-1"
8'-4"
(E)INTERIOR FLOOR
ROOF
(E)CEILING HEIGHT
(N)FRENCH 60 68
(N)PATIO DECK158 SFRISE HEIGHT 6"TREAD DEPTH 11"
(N)FRENCH 60 68
3 COATS OF PLASTERSCRATCH / BROWN / FINISH(N) STUCCO PATCH / TYPWITH 6" OVERLAP WITHEXISTINGTWO LAYERS OFBUILDING PAPERSTUCCO MOLDING (P) NORTH ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
2'-6" GRADE TO FINISH FLOOR
CEILING HEIGHT
INTERIOR FLOOR
ROOF8'-4"2'-6" 5'-2"
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
ROOF2'-9"2'-6"4'-6"
6"2'-6" 2'-10"6'-11"
3'-8"
3' 2'4'
5'-6"
8'-6" 13'-034"9'-714"6'-1"
6'-612"
6'-1"
(E) NORTH ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
(E) EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN (E) TRIMSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
(E) WINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
(E) CORNICEMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE (E) EXTERIOR STAIR MATERIAL:WOOD NATURAL - SEALED
(E) ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLADGABLE VENTMATERIAL: ALUMINUMFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE (E) DOWNSPOUT(E) CRAWLSPACE VENTILATION
(E) EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN (E) TRIMSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
(E) WINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
(E) CORNICEMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE (E) ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLAD(E) GABLE VENTMATERIAL: ALUMINUMFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE (E) DOWNSPOUT(E) CRAWLSPACE VENTILATION
5'-1 12"
1 (N) 2X6 P.T.DF#2 LEDGERW/ (2) 14" X 4 12" SDSSCREW @ 16" O.C.TO RIM/BLK 1 NO WORK DONE HERE
A6001
A6002
2% SLOPE
16'-2" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
8'-4"2'-6" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
5'-112"10'-1012"
2 8'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT10'-3"
1 2% SLOPE
16'-2" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
8'-4"2'-6" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
5'-112"10'-1012"
2 8'-5" WALL PLATE HEIGHT10'-3"
1 2
2 1
2 1
A6003
LOCATIONTYPSIZEKITCHEND01
(N) EXTERIOR DOOR SCHEDULE
D02MASTER BEDROOMHEADER
DOOR SCHEDULE
DOUBLE OUTSWING60 6860 68(N) OPENING
THE CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY ALL EXTERIOR CONDITIONS AND SIZES BEFORE ORDERING AND INSTALLING
DOUBLE OUTSWING(E) OPENING
PELLA TRADITIONAL RESERVE OR MARVIN ULTIMATE WOOD / OR SIMILAR / TYPTRADITIONAL WOOD-CLAD DOUBLE OUTSWING DOORS WITH AUTHENTICALLY DIVIDED LITES AREAS OF WORKBUILDING MATERIALS:(E) CONDITIONS(N) CONDITIONSEXTERIOR WALL(E) STUCCO(N) TO MATCH (E) (N) WINDOW SCHEDULESHEDW01W02 FIXED WINDOW30 59(N) OPENING(E) OPENINGSHEDFIXED WINDOW30 59 DOOR NOTESR609.1GENERAL. WINDOWS AND DOORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FENESTRATION MANUFACTURER’S WRITTENINSTRUCTIONS. WINDOW AND DOOR OPENINGS SHALL BE FLASHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R703.4. WRITTENINSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE FENESTRATION MANUFACTURER FOR EACH WINDOW OR DOOR.- ALL GLASS IN DOORS SHALL BE TEMPERED. TEMPERED GLASS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED AND VISIBLE WHEN THEUNIT IS GLAZED.- ALL GLAZING WILL BE INSTALLED WITH A CERTIFYING LABEL ATTACHED, SHOWING THE "U" VALUE.- REFER TO FLOOR PLANS FOR DIRECTION OF DOOR SWING.- DOORS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM INFILTRATION REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 116 E.E.S.- VENTILATION SHALL COMPLY WITH C.B.C. 1203.4 AND R303.- ALL EXTERIOR WINDOW AND EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES TO HAVE AN STC RATING OF 36 OR GREATER.- DOORS MAY OPEN TO THE EXTERIOR ONLY IF THE FLOOR OR LANDING IS NOT MORE THAN 1-1/2 INCH LOWER THAN THE DOORTHRESHOLD. SECTION R311.3.1 CRC- GLAZED OPENINGS WITHIN EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE INSULATING-GLASS UNITS WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE,- EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES SHALL CONFORM TO THE PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS OF STANDARD 12-7A-1 OR SHALL BEAPPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION OR IGNITION-RESISTANT MATERIAL, OR SOLID CORE WOOD HAVING STILES ANDRAILS NOT LESS THAN 1 3/8 INCHES THICK WITH INTERIOR FIELD PANEL THICKNESS NO LESS THAN 1 1/4 INCHES THICK, ORSHALL HAVE A FIRE-RESISTANT RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 20 MIN WHEN TESTED ACCORDING TO NPA 257.- ALL EXTERIOR DOORS OTHER THAN VEHICULAR ACCESS DOORS TO GARAGES SHALL BE SOLID-CORE, NOT LESS THAN 1-3/8INCHES THICK OR UTILIZE MULTIPLE-GLAZED PANELS CONSISTING OF NOT LESS THAN DUAL PANE GLAZING, WITH AT LEASTONE TEMPERED GLASS PANE. (CRC R337)WINDOW NOTES- ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 24” OF DOORS SHALL BE TEMPERED.- ALL WINDOW DIMENSIONS PERTAIN TO ROUGH OPENINGS (R.O.), CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ACTUAL DIMENSIONS FORWINDOWS- ALL GLAZING WILL BE INSTALLED WITH A CERTIFYING LABEL ATTACHED, SHOWING THE NFRC LABEL.- ALL GLAZING SHALL BE SPECTRALLY SELECTIVE LOW E COATED TO MEET TITLE 24 ENERGY REQUIREMENTS.- WINDOWS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM INFILTRATION REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 116 E.E.S.D- VENTILATION SHALL COMPLY WITH C.B.C. 1203.4 AND R303- ALL EXTERIOR WINDOW AND EXTERIOR DOOR ASSEMBLIES TO HAVE AN STC RATING OF 36 OR GREATER.- TEMPERED GLASS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED AND VISIBLE WHEN THE UNIT IS GLAZED.- EVERY SPACE INTENDED FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH NATURAL VENTILATION AND NATURAL LIGHT BYMEANS OF VENTILATION / ARTIFICIAL LIGHT. CBC SECTIONS 1203.4 AND 1205.1 AND R303* THE MINIMUM NET GLAZED AREA FOR NATURAL LIGHT SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 8%OF THE FLOOR AREA OF THE ROOMSERVED. CBC SECTION 1205.2* THE MINIMUM OPENABLE AREA TO THE OUTDOORS FOR NATURAL VENTILATION SHALL BE 4% OF THE FLOOR AREA BEINGVENTILATED. SECTION 1203.4- EXTERIOR WALLS, WINDOW WALLS, GLAZED OPENING WITH EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE INSULATING-GLASS UNITS WITH AMINIMUM TEMPERED PANE- FIRE-EXISTING RATED GLAZING TESTED AS A PART OF FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED WALL ASSEMBLY IN ACCORDANCE WITHASTM E 119 OR UL 263 TO BE CONSTRUCTED OF MULTI-PANE GLAZING WITH A MINIMUM OF ONE TEMPERED PANE MEETING THEREQUIREMENT OF SECTION 2406, CONSTRUCTED OF GLASS BLOCK UNITS, OR HAVE A FIRE-RESISTIVE RATING OF NOT LESSTHAN 20 MINUTES WHEN TESTED ACCORDING TO NFPA 257 8'-4"1'-9" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
2'-9"ROOF
8'-4"5'-2"
10'-1012" WALL PLATE HEIGHT10'-1012" 5'-112"
1'-9" GRADE TO FINISH FLOOR2'-6" GRADE TOFINISH FLOOR
1'-4"4'-4"5'-6"4'-4"21'-014"
15'-10"
2'-3"
12'-10"
1'-834"
2'-4"8"2'-4"
4'
2'-6"2'-6"
2'-10"
1112" 2' 3'-6"2'5" 5"
4'-4"
3'-6"6'
5'-1"
5'-014"
CEILING HEIGHT
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
(E) WEST ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
10'-1"4'-4"6'-714"
12'-214"
10'-10"
8'
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE
(E)PATIO DECK
8'-4"1'-9" 5'-2"CEILING HEIGHT
FINISH FLOOR
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
2'-9"ROOF
8'-4"5'-2"5'-112"
1'-9" GRADE TO FINISH FLOOR2'-6" GRADE TOFINISH FLOOR
1'-4"4'-4"5'-6"4'-4"21'-014"
15'-10"
2'-3"
12'-10"
1'-834"
2'-4"8"2'-4"
4'
2'-6"2'-6"
2'-10"
1112" 2' 3'-6"2'5" 5"
4'-4"
3'-6"6'
5'-1"
5'-014"
CEILING HEIGHT
ROOF
EXTERIOR GRADE LEVEL
(P) WEST ELEVATION SC: 3/16" =1'
10'-1"4'-4"6'-714"
10'-10"
PROPERTY LINE
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE(N)PATIO DECK158 SF
12'-214"
10'-10"
THE WEST ELEVATION OF THEGARAGE SHALL NOT BECHANGED
8'
(E) EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN (E) ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLAD(E)EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN (E) WINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE(E) CRAWLSPACE VENT(E) DOWNSPOUT EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE /BROWN ASPHALT SHINGLE-CLAD(E)EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN (E)TRIMSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
WINDOWSMATERIAL:WOODFINISH:PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE(E) CRAWLSPACE VENT(E) DOWNSPOUT HISTORIC COOLER VENTSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE (E) HISTORIC COOLER VENTSMATERIAL: WOODFINISH: PAINTEDCOLOR: OFF WHITE
PROPERTY LINE
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE
2% SLOPE
15'-11" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
8'-4" CEILING HEIGHT10'-912"7'-934" WALL PLATE HEIGHTGRADE
PROPERTY LINE
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE
2% SLOPE
15'-11" HIGHEST ROOF POINT
ROOF
CURBLEVEL 0
8'-4" CEILING HEIGHT10'-912"7'-934" WALL PLATE HEIGHTGRADE 2 2
2 2
1 1
(E)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS1(E) FENCE1
(N)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS(E)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS1
2'-4"8"2'-4"
4'
(P) WEST ELEVATION / GARAGESC: 3/16" =1'
3'-2"8'4'-3" 3'-2"4'-3"3'-434" 31'-1034"
5'-4"
8'-834" TO PROPERTY LINE12'-214"
(E)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS(N)EXTERIOR PRIVACY WALLS
5'-814"
THE WEST ELEVATION OF THEGARAGE SHALL NOT BECHANGED
11 (E) EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN DECK JOIST1/2 PLYWD W/8D @ 6"O.C. E.N.(E) FTG
STEM WALLPAD GR
(E) 2X6 CRIPPLE @ 16" O.C.
U.O.N. A35 @ 16" O.C.2X6 P.T.DF#2 LEDGERW/ (2) 14" X 4 12" SDSSCREW @ 16" O.C.TO RIM/BLK BLACKPOLYPROPYLENESPACER 2-1/2 IN.DIAMETER 5/8 IN.THICK 12 PER BAG (E) STUCCO WALL
DETAIL 001
2-3/4"
342-1/2"34
1"34
12"
34" ROUND
(E) CORNICE DETAIL 002
SCALEDATESHEET:
PERSHEET
REVISIONS:________________________________________________________________________________________________ OASIS HOMEDESIGN STUDIODANIEL [email protected] A6(N) FLOOR PLAN &ELEVATIONS
03-26-25484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060 HOME OWNER(S):MARTIN & XINNIN
106-06-25
1 1
207-22-25
(N) SHED
(N) SHEDSC: 1/2" =1'
3'
3'
3'-6"3'
7'-9"8'-4"7"10'-912"
3' 6'-214" 3'
3'-6"
7'-9"8'-4"7"10'-912"
12'-214"
5'-712" 51°
12'-214"
10'-10"
2'-5"3'11'-7"
12'-214"
8'1'-8"11'-2" 2'-3"16'-5"
10"1'-4"
20'
3'2'-5"3'11'-7"11'-2"15'-11"
20'
8'
1'-8"
3'17'20'
R1'-6"180°5'-9"
11'-7"
3'-11"
7'-9"8'-4"7"
10'-912"
2'-512"
2'3' 2'-5"
3' 17'20'
R1'-6"180°
5'-9"
11'-7"
3'-11"
7'-9"8'-4"7"
10'-912"
2'-512"
2'3'2'-5"
12'-214"
THE WEST ELEVATION OF THEGARAGE SHALL NOT BECHANGEDEXISTING DOWNSPOUT
EXISTING DOWNSPOUT
(E) ROOF MATERIAL: EARTH-TONE / BROWNASPHALT SHINGLE-CLAD(E) EXTERIOR WALLMATERIAL: STUCCOFINISH: TEXTURECOLOR:BEIGE / TANN 3'-1034"
1'-4"
2'-3"3'-1034"
1'-4"1'-4"
R3'R3'
R3'
R3'
(N) STUCCO PATCH / TYPWITH 6" OVERLAP WITH EXISTING(N) STUCCO PATCH / TYPWITH 6" OVERLAP WITH EXISTING (N) STUCCO PATCH / TYPWITH 6" OVERLAP WITH EXISTING
A600322
SCALEDATESHEET:
PERSHEET
REVISIONS:________________________________________________________________________________________________ OASIS HOMEDESIGN STUDIODANIEL [email protected] A7(N) SHED
03-26-25484 LORETO ST, MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041APN 15830060 HOME OWNER(S):MARTIN & XINNIN
106-06-25207-22-25