Digitally signed by
William Sowa
DN: C=US,
[email protected],
Reason: I am the author
of this document
Date: 2024.05.30
12:34:01-07'00'
ARBORIST REPORT
March 1, 2019
Rev. May 30, 2024
4984.00
PROJ
ECT
Ambra Property
Mountain View, CA
PREPAR
ED FOR
Mario Ambra
PREPAR
ED BY
HMH
1570 Oakland Road
San Jose, CA 95131
William Sowa
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-12270A
Attachment 3
HMH Page 1 of 27 05/30/24
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Table of Contents 1
Introduction and Overview 2
Methodology 2
Summary of Findings 2
General Observations and Recommendations 3
Recommendations for Tree Protection During Construction 6 Maintenance Recommendations for Trees to Remain 8
Terms and Conditions 10
Exhibit A - Tree Location Map 11
Exhibit B – Site Plan 12
Table 1 - Tree Quantity Summary 13
Table 2 - Tree Evaluation Summary 14
Table 3 – Tree Valuations 24
HMH Page 2 of 27 05/30/24
INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
HMH was contracted to complete a tree survey, assessment and arborist report for trees located within the limit of work illustrated on Exhibit A, attached. The project site encompasses three adjacent parcels, totaling approximately 1.75 acres. The parcels are partially developed with several structures. The property was historically agriculture and operated an olive oil production facility and a couple of residential single family units and accessory structures. The parcels are bound by Rengstorff Ave, Plymouth Street, Leghorn Street and residential development. with developed with office buildings, surface parking and ornamental landscaping throughout the site.
There is vegetation along both these frontages that was not part of this survey. Our scope of services includes visually locating, measuring DBH, and assessing the condition of all trees within the limit of work. Disposition and health recommendations are based on current site conditions.
Site development/design may affect the preservation suitability.
METHODOLOGY
Our tree survey work is a deliberate and systematic methodology for cataloging trees on site:
1. Identify each tree species.
2. Note each tree’s location on a site map.
3. Measure each trunk circumference at 4.5’ above grade per ISA standards.
4. Evaluate the health and structure of each tree using the following numerical standard:
5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species. 4 - A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected.
3 - A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that may that might be mitigated with care. 2 - A tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated.
1 - A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormic growth; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated.
0 - Tree is dead.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
HMH conducted a tree inventory of 133 trees located within the limit of work outlined in Exhibit A. 35 of the trees inventoried are classified as Heritage Trees under the City of Mountain View tree section 32.23. A protected tree is:
The City of Mountain View’s (“City”) Heritage Tree Ordinance (“Ordinance”), regulates removal of heritage trees. The Ordinance defines heritage trees to include four types of trees:
(1) Trees with a trunk with a circumference of forty-eight inches (48”) or more measured at fifty-four inches (54”)
(2) Multi-branched trees which have major branches below fifty-four (54) inches above the natural grade with a circumference of forty-eight (48) inches measured just below the first major trunk fork.
(3) Any quercus (oak), sequoia (redwood), or cedrus (cedar) tree with a circumference of twelve (12) inches or more when measured at fifty-four (54) inches above natural grade. (4) Trees that are designated by resolution of the city council to be of special historic value or significant community benefit. In order for this designation to occur, the City must first provide written notice to the property where the tree is located.
HMH Page 3 of 27 05/30/24
Overall, the tree species planted throughout the site are moderately diverse with the largest proportion of a single species representing approximately 47% of the total tree quantity. Aside from a small number of recently planted trees, most of the trees inventoried were moderately mature with an estimated age of approximately 30-40 years old.
Architecture and Landscape Architecture plans dated August 2023 were reviewed for impacts on trees.
Table 1 - Tree Quantity Summary summarizes tree quantities by both species and size. Each species that was inventoried as part of this scope is included. This is a useful tool for analyzing the mixture of trees as part of the project. The size table is useful when calculating mitigation requirements in the case of tree removal as well as aiding in determining tree maturity.
Table 2 - Tree Evaluation Summary lists each tree number, botanical name, common name, DBH, circumference, ordinance trees, health rating, preservation suitability, general notes and observations and recommendations.
See Exhibit A for Tree Location Map
See Table 1 for Tree Quantity Summary by species.
See Table 2 for Tree Evaluation Summary for sizes, notes and recommendations regarding each tree.
See Table 3 for Tree Valuations
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Major species recommendations shown below, see recommendation column on Table 2 for individual species/specimens.
Species: Cupressus sempervirens (Italian Cypress)
Quantity: 63
Observation: Italian cypress make about 47% of the trees found within the limit of work.
Generally, these trees were observed in moderate to good health. They ring the front and side of the project along Rengstorff Ave and Plymouth Street. A few new trees have been planted to maintain the look of the perimeter green “wall”
Recommendations: The Italian Cypress trees need to be removed. They are in direct conflict with the proposed sidewalk.
Species: Casuarina equisetifolia (Australian Pine)
Quantity: 18
Observations: The Australian Pine look to be some of the oldest trees on the site as they have large canopies and truck diamgeters. They appear to be in moderate health but due to lack of maintenance have poor branch and crown structure. Trees 72-78 are behind the newer good neighbor fence along the east property edge but look to be the same age.
Recommendations: Trees 72 – 78 are slightly off site. There is a proposed walkway that is apx. 3 feet from the trunks and the proposed building is apx. 12-13’ from the trunks. The construction activities such as excavation and compaction will negatively impact the tree roots. Because of these impacts, it is recommended these trees are removed. If they are to be retained, monitoring HMH Page 4 of 27 05/30/24
of the trees health should be done regularly and crown cleaning pruning can improve the overall appearance. Tree protection should remain in place during the duration of construction per the City of Mountain View Tree Technical Manual.
Species: Sequoia sempervirens (coast redwood)
Quantity: 2
Observations: The two Coast Redwood trees are being overpowered by the Chinese Pistache (tree #4) tree planted in front of them. This has resulted in moderate to poor health and structure for these two trees. They are also planted in small tree wells in paved area and look stressed from potentially lack of water.
Recommendations: Overcrowding will continue if the current conditions remain. Removal of one species would allow for the more natural development of the canopy of the remaining tree. If the redwoods are to remain additional supplemental potable water should be applied to revive the specimens. These trees are out of the construction scope of work.
Species: Pistacia chinensis (Chinese Pistache)
Quantity: 5
Observations: The five Chinese Pistace along Leghorn Street are in moderately good health.
They are functioning as street tree although they are technically on private property. These specimens could benefit from a crown cleaning and supplemental irrigation. They can continue to provide a benefit to street scape along this frontage if able to be worked into the design and protected during construction.
Recommendations: Provide additional canopy area by removing adjacent trees that are declining and provide structural pruning. Provide supplemental irrigation. These trees are out of the construction scope of work.
Species: Olea europaea (Olive Tree)
Quantity: 8
Observations: Most of the olive trees are older orchard trees and are in moderate to poor health.
Years of lack of pruning and dieback has created some irregular crown structure and lopsidedness for many of the trees. The center of tree 127 has complete dieback.
Recommendations: Olives have a good rate of transplant success if performed by a skilled tree moving company. A couple of the specimens could be candidates for on or offsite replanting. If the trees are not transplanted they will need to be removed because they are within the footprint of the proposed building.
Species: Magnolia grandiflora (Magnolia Tree)
Quantity: 1
Observations: The magnolia tree is in moderate health and exhibits signs of stress potentially due to lack of water. It is along the perimeter of the site along Rengstorff Ave just at the end of the long stand of Italian Cypress.
Recommendations: The magnolia is in direct conflict with the proposed sidewalk.
Species: Citrus sp. (Assorted Citrus), Diospyros kaki (Persimmon), Ficus carica (Fig), Malus sp. (Assorted Apple), Morus Alba (Mulberry), Pyrus sp. (Assorted Pear), Prunus sp. (Assorted cherry and plum), Punica granatum (Pomegranate)
HMH Page 5 of 27 05/30/24
Quantity: 36
Observations: The reminder of the site trees are fruiting forms of trees that are of various ages with some being recently planted and other more mature specimens. Most of the older trees have not been maintained over the years and while many still were producing fruit they have poor structures and some dieback. The younger trees are in fine form, but no real fruit production was observed on many which may be a sign of lack of water or nutrients for proper setting of fruit.
Most of the trees were non-significant except for the single mulberry tree (#100). There is bracing between several the branches so additional care has been taken to make sure the structure of the tree does not fail. It appears to be one of the older trees on the site.
Recommendations: Many of these trees will continue to decline and develop poor shape unless there is a maintenance program tailored to fruit producing trees which is more specific than their ornamental counterparts. Many of the fig and citrus have poor canopy structure and canopy die back. While there could be opportunities for moving some of the smaller trees it would be more cost effective to purchase new nursery stock. Most of the trees are in conflict with the proposed building, either within the footprint or within a few feet and will need to be removed.
HMH Page 6 of 27 05/30/24
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREE PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION Follow the requirements in Section 5: Best Management Practices for Construction Site Management in the City of Mountain View Tree Technical Manual. https://www.mountainview.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/3898/637974641051670000 Site preparation: Tree protection shall be installed before demolition, grading or construction begins and remain in place until final inspection of the project permit.
The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) for discretionary development projects is determined by the Project Arborist. The TPZ is typically calculated, at a minimum, to be the greater of:
• 6 feet, or
• Out to the dripline of the tree (the edge of the canopy), or • Calculated by multiplying each tree’s diameter at 4.5 feet above existing grade (DBH) by a factor of one (1) to determine the diameter, in feet, of the area above and below ground to be protected. For example, a tree with trunk diameter of 20 inches would have TPZ fencing installed at least 10 feet from the trunk (diameter=20 feet, radius=10 feet) The TPZ for all other projects is typically out to the dripline of the tree.
The typical procedure is to install fencing to define the TPZ as described in the Conditions of Approval and/or Tree Protection Report. Fencing shall be:
• 6-foot high chain link, with posts 2 inches in diameter, driven 2 feet into the ground. The distance between posts shall be not more than 10 feet.
• If the plans approve trunk wraps instead of fencing, follow those specifications instead.
Trunk wraps usually consist of placing 2 inch by 4 inch lumber or straw waddles around the trunk, then securing them with a wrap of orange plastic safety netting. • Movable barriers of chain link fencing secured to cement blocks may be substituted for “fixed” fencing if the Project Arborist and City staff agree that the fencing will need to be moved to accommodate certain phases of construction.
There shall be a 8.5 x 11-inches warning sign on each fence. See the City of Mountain View Tree Technical Manual for example.
All contractors, subcontractors and other personnel shall be warned that encroachment within the fenced area is forbidden without the consent of the certified arborist on the job. This includes, but is not limited to, storage of lumber and other materials, disposal of paints, solvents or other noxious materials, parked cars, grading equipment or other heavy equipment. Install a six -inch (6”) layer of coarse mulch or wood chips within the TPZ of protected trees. Mulch shall be kept 12 inches away from the trunk.
Trenching and excavation
Only excavate by hand or with compressed air within the TPZ of trees (if approved). Machine trenching shall not be allowed.
Any approved excavation, demolition or extraction of material shall be performed with equipment sitting outside the TPZ. Use the smallest equipment required, and as roots are encountered stop excavation and expose roots by hand. Prune any root 2 inches or larger at the edge of the excavation or trench, using a clean and sharp saw, sawzall, narrow trencher with sharp blades or other approved root pruning equipment.
Fill trenches within 24 hours; where this is not possible, the side of the trench adjacent to the trees should be kept shaded with dampened, untreated burlap, wetted as frequently as necessary to keep the burlap wet.
HMH Page 7 of 27 05/30/24
Tunneling and directional boring
Where possible, route pipes outside of the TPZ of a protected tree to avoid conflict with roots.
Where it is not possible to reroute pipes, the contractor should bore or tunnel beneath the TPZ of the tree. The boring shall take place not less than three feet (3’) below the surface of the soil in order to avoid encountering “feeder” roots. Mechanically boring a tunnel under the roots within the TPZ with a horizontal directional drill and hydraulic or pneumatic air excavation technology is preferable instead of trenching.
All boring equipment must be staged outside of the TPZ.
Tree root protection and maintenance
Root Buffer: When areas under the tree canopy cannot be fenced, a temporary buffer can be used to cover the root zone and remain in place at the specified thickness until final grading stage.
The protective buffer consists of a base course of tree chips spread over the root area to a minimum of 6- inch depth, layered by ¾ inch quarry gravel to stabilize ¾ inch plywood on top.
Mulching: Spread wood chips within the TPZ to a 4- to 6-inch depth. Mulch should be no closer than 1-ft. to the trunk. Mulch material shall be 2-inch unpainted, untreated wood chips or approved equal.
Irrigation: Apply water to the rootzone of trees that are to be preserved on site. Deep slow watering is recommended.
Damage and mitigation
Report any severe damage due to construction activities to the Project Arborist and City Staff within six (6) hours so that remedial action can be taken.
In the event of injury, the following mitigation and damage control measures apply:
Root injury: All damaged, torn, and cut roots shall be given a clean cut to remove ragged edges.
Prune roots 2 inches or larger to sound wood.
Injury to branches or leaves: Prune broken or torn branches back to an appropriate point within five days of injury. If leaves are heat scorched from equipment exhaust pipes, consult the Project Arborist within 6 hours.
Activities to Avoid
Runoff or spillage of damaging materials into the area below any tree canopy.
Storing construction materials or portable toilets, stockpiling of soil, or parking or driving vehicles within the TPZ.
Cutting, breaking, skinning, or bruising tree roots, branches, or trunks.
Parking vehicles and discharging exhaust into foliage.
Securing cable, chain, or rope to trees or shrubs.
Trenching, digging, or otherwise excavating within the TPZ of trees.
Soil disturbance or grade change.
HMH Page 8 of 27 05/30/24
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREES TO REMAIN
Regular maintenance, designed to promote plant health and vigor, ensures longevity of existing trees. Regular inspections and the necessary follow-up care of mulching, fertilizing, and pruning, can detect problems and correct them before they become damaging or fatal.
Post Construction: At minimum, follow the recommended steps below:
• Complete post-construction tree maintenance, including pruning, mulching, irrigation, and soil aeration where necessary.
• Remove, by hand, all root protection material such as wood chips, gravel, and plywood. • Provide slow and deep watering throughout the dripline of trees on the site. • Inspect trees annually for at least three (3) and up to five (5) years after construction to look for changes in condition and signs of insects or disease and to determine maintenance needs.
Tree Inspection: Regular inspections of mature trees at least once a year can prevent or reduce the severity of future disease, insect, and environmental problems. During tree inspection, four characteristics of tree vigor should be examined: new leaves or buds, leaf size, twig growth, and absence of crown dieback (gradual death of the upper part of the tree). A reduction in the extension of shoots (new growing parts), such as buds or new leaves, is a fairly reliable cue that the tree’s health has recently changed. Growth of the shoots over the past three years may be compared to determine whether there is a reduction in the tree’s typical growth pattern. Further signs of poor tree health are trunk decay, crown dieback, or both. These symptoms often indicate problems that began several years before. Loose bark or deformed growths, such as trunk conks (mushrooms), are common signs of stem decay. Any abnormalities found during these inspections, including insect activity and spotted, deformed, discolored, or dead leaves and twigs, should be noted and observed closely.
Mulching: Mulch, or decomposed organic material, placed over the root zone of a tree reduces environmental stress by providing a root environment that is cooler and contains more moisture than the surrounding soil. Mulch can also prevent mechanical damage by keeping machines such as lawn mowers and string trimmers away from the tree’s base. Furthermore, mulch reduces competition from surrounding weeds and turf. To be most effective, mulch should be placed 2 to 4 inches deep and cover the entire root system, which may be as far as 2 or 3 times the diameter of the branch spread of the tree. If the area and activities happening around the tree do not permit the entire area to be mulched, it is recommended that as much of the area under the drip line of the tree is mulched as possible. When placing mulch, care should be taken not to cover the actual trunk of the tree. This mulch-free area, 1 to 2 inches wide at the base, is sufficient to avoid moist bark conditions and prevent trunk decay. An organic mulch layer 2 to 4 inches deep of loosely packed shredded leaves, pine straw, peat moss, or composted wood chips is adequate. Plastic should not be used as it interferes with the exchange of gases between soil and air, which inhibits root growth. Thicker mulch layers, 5 to 6 inches deep or greater, may also inhibit gas exchange.
Fertilization: Trees require certain nutrients (essential elements) to function and grow. Urban landscape trees may be growing in soils that do not contain sufficient available nutrients for satisfactory growth and development. In certain situations, it may be necessary to fertilize to improve plant vigor. Fertilizing a tree can improve growth; however, if fertilizer is not applied wisely, it may not benefit the tree at all and may even adversely affect the tree. Mature trees making satisfactory growth may not require fertilization. When considering supplemental fertilizer, it is important to consider nutrients deficiencies and how and when to amend the deficiencies.
HMH Page 9 of 27 05/30/24
Soil conditions, especially pH and organic matter content, vary greatly, making the proper selection and use of fertilizer a somewhat complex process. To that end, it is recommended that the soil be tested for nutrient content. A soil testing laboratory and can give advice on application rates, timing, and the best blend of fertilizer for each tree and other landscape plants on site.
Mature trees have expansive root systems that extend from 2 to 3 times the size of the leaf canopy. A major portion of actively growing roots is located outside the tree’s drip line.
Understanding the actual size and extent of a tree’s root system before applying fertilizer is paramount to determine quantity, type and rate at which to best apply fertilizer. Always follow manufacturer recommendations for use and application.
Pruning: Pruning is often desirable or necessary to remove dead, diseased, or insect -infested branches and to improve tree structure, enhance vigor, or maintain safety. Because each cut has the potential to change the growth of (or cause damage to) a tree, no branch should be removed without reason. Removing foliage from a tree has two distinct effects on growth: (1) it reduces photosynthesis and, (2) it may reduce overall growth. Pruning should always be performed sparingly. Caution must be taken not to over -prune as a tree may not be able to gather and process enough sunlight to survive. Pruning mature trees may require special equipment, training, and experience. Arborists are equipped to provide a variety of services to assist in performing the job safely and reducing risk of personal injury and property damage (See also Addendum A - ANSI A300 Part 1 Pruning Standards).
Removal: There are circumstances when removal is necessary. An arborist can help decide whether or not a tree should be removed. Professionally trained arborists have the skills and equipment to safely and efficiently remove trees. Removal is recommended when a tree: (1) is dead, dying, or considered irreparably hazardous; (2) is causing an obstruction or is crowding and causing harm to other trees and the situation is impossible to correct through pruning; (3) is to be replaced by a more suitable specimen, and; (4) should be removed to allow for construction.
Pruning or removing trees, especially large trees, can be dangerous work. It should be performed only by those trained and equipped to work safely in trees.
HMH Page 10 of 27 05/30/24
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The following terms and conditions apply to all oral and written reports and correspondence pertaining to consultations, inspections and activities of HMH.
1. The scope of any report or other correspondence is limited to the trees and conditions specifically mentioned in those reports and correspondence. HMH assumes no liability for the failure of trees or parts of trees, either inspected or otherwise. HMH assumes no responsibility to report on the condition of any tree or landscape feature not specifically requested by the named client.
2. No tree described in this report was climbed, unless otherwise stated. HMH does not take responsibility for any defects, which could have only been discovered by climbing. A full root collar inspection, consisting of excavating the soil around the tree to uncover the root collar and major buttress roots was not performed unless otherwise stated. HMH does not take responsibility for any root defects, which could only have been discovered by such an inspection.
3. HMH shall not be required to provide further documentation, give testimony, be deposed, or attend court by reason of this appraisal or report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of additional fees for such services as described by HMH or in the schedule of fees or contract.
4. HMH guarantees no warrantee, either expressed or implied, as to the suitability of the information contained in the reports for any reason. It is the responsibility of the client to determine applicability to his/her case.
5. Any report and the values, observations and recommendations expressed therein represent the professional opinion of HMH, and the fee for services is in no manner contingent upon the reporting of a specified value nor upon any particular finding to be reported.
6. Any photographs, diagrams, graphs, sketches or other graphic material included in any report, being intended solely as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys, unless otherwise noted in the report. Any reproductions of graphic material or the work produced by other persons, is intended solely for the purpose of clarification and ease of reference. Inclusion of said information does not constitute a representation by HMH as to the sufficiency or accuracy of that information.
7. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
HMH Page 11 of 27 05/30/24
EXHIBIT A
5SFFT
68-54 53 5SFFT 52-16 5SFFT 15-8
7 133 131
127
126
125 104
105
100 98 97 96
93 95 5
132 130 129 103 102 101 99 89 94 92 91 90 3
69 70 128
122
124
123
106
109
88 107
108
87 86 85 2
84 80
71 5SFFT 72-78
5SFFT 121-110
83 82 81 79
1 6
4 HMH Page 12 of 27 05/30/24
EXHIBIT B - SITE PLAN
SITE AREA =
54782 SQ. FT.
HMH Page 13 of 27 05/30/24
TABLE 1 - TREE QUANTITY SUMMARY
Tree Quantity by Species
Species Quantity % of Site
Casuarina equisetifolia 18 14%
Citrus sp. 4 3%
Cupressus sempervirens 63 47%
Diospyros kaki 4 3%
Ficus carica 8 6%
Malus sp. 2 2%
Magnolia grandiflora 1 1%
Morus Alba 1 1%
Olea europaea 8 6%
Pistacia chinensis 5 4%
Pyrus sp. 5 4%
Prunus sp. 10 8%
Punica granatum 2 2%
Sequoia sempervirens 2 2%
Total Trees 133 100%
HMH Page 14 of 27 05/30/24
TREE EVALUATION SUMMARY
Prepared By: William Sowa, ISA Certified Arborist, WE-12270A DBH MEASUREMENT HEIGHT: 54"
Date of Evaluation: 5/28/2024
Suitability for Preservation is based on the following
Good - Trees with good health and structural stability that have the potential for longevity at the site.
Moderate - Trees in somewhat declining health and/or exhibits structural defects that cannot be abated with treatment. Trees will require more intense management and will have a shorter lifespan than those in the 'Good' category.
Poor - Trees in poor health or with significant structural defects that cannot be mitigated. Tree is expected to decline, regardless of treatment.
Health Rating
5 A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species. 4 A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected. 3 A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that may that might be mitigated with care. 2 A tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. 1 A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormic growth; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. 0 Tree is dead.
Abbreviations and Definitions
CD Codominant branches Forked branches nearly the same size in diameter, arising from a common junction an lacking a normal branch union.
CDB Dieback in Crown Condition where branches in the tree crown die from the tips toward the center.
CR CR Tree is bounded closely by one or more of the following: structure, tree, D Decline Tree shows obvious signs of decline, which may be indicative of the presence of multiple biotic and abiotic disorders.
DBH Diameter at Breast
Height Measurement of tree diameter in inches. Measurement height varies by City and is noted above.
EG Epicormic Growth Watersprouting on trunk and main leaders. Typically indicative of tree stress.
EH Exposed Heartwood Exposure of the tree's heartwood is typically seen as an open wound that leaves a tree more susceptible to pathogens, disease or infection.
H Hazardous A tree that in it's current condition, presents a hazard.
HD Headed Poor pruning practice of cutting back branches. Often practiced under utility lines to limit tree height.
IB Included Bark Structural defect where bark is included between the branch attachment so the wood can't join. Such defect can have a higher probability of failure.
LC Low crotch Multiple central leaders originating below the DBH measurement site.
LN Leaning Tree Tree leaning, see notes for severity.
ML Multiple Leaders More than one upright primary stem
PT Phototropism Tree exhibits phototropic growth habits. Reduced trunk taper, misshapen trunk and canopy growth are examples of this growth habit.
S Suckers Shoot arising from the roots.
SD Structural Defects Naturally or secondary conditions including cavities, poor branch attachments, cracks, or decayed wood in any part of the tree that may contribute to structural failure.
SE Severe Indicates the severity of the following term.
SL Slight Indicates the mildness of the following term.
SR Surface Roots Roots visible at finished grade.
ST Stress Environmental factor inhibiting regular tree growth. Includes drought, salty soils, nitrogen and other nutrient deficiencies in the soil.
WU Weak Union Weak union or fork in tree branching structure.
HMH Page 15 of 27 05/30/24
Heritage Tree
The City of Mountain View’s (“City”) Heritage Tree Ordinance (“Heritage”), regulates removal of heritage trees. The Ordinance defines heritage trees to include four types of trees:
(1) Trees with a trunk with a circumference of forty-eight inches (48”) or more measured at fifty-four inches (54”) (2) Multi-branched trees which have major branches below fifty-four (54) inches above the natural grade with a circumference of forty-eight (48) inches measured just below the first major trunk fork.
(3) Any quercus (oak), sequoia (redwood), or cedrus (cedar) tree with a circumference of twelve (12) inches or more when measured at fifty-four (54) inches above natural grade. (4) Trees that are designated by resolution of the city council to be of special historic value or significant community benefit. In order for this designation to occur, the City must first provide written notice to the property where the tree is located. Mario and Liz, will you please confirm that you have never received such notice from the City for any tree at the property? HMH Page 16 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
1 Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 14.0 44 NO 4 Good Acting as street tree could be retained with
proper protection measures.
2 Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 15.3 48 YES 4 Good Acting as street tree could be retained with
proper protection measures.
3 Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 16.6 52 YES 4 Good Acting as street tree could be retained with
proper protection measures.
4 Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 11.8 37 NO 4 Good Acting as street tree could be retained with
proper protection measures.
5 Sequoia sempervirens
Redwood Tree
11.8 37
YES
3 Poor
ST, CDB
Croweded canopies and showing signs of
stress. Remove to help adjancet trees.
6 Sequoia sempervirens
Redwood Tree
14.1 44
YES
3 Poor
ST, CDB
Croweded canopies and showing signs of
stress. Remove to help adjancet trees.
7 Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache 12.8 40 NO 4 Moderate Acting as street tree could be retained with
proper protection measures.
8 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.0 31 NO 4 Moderate
Not within the scope of work
9 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.2 32 NO 4 Moderate
Not within the scope of work
10 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.8 34 NO 4 Moderate vine infestation
Not within the scope of work
11 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.0 31 NO 4 Moderate vine infestation
Not within the scope of work
12 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.0 25 NO 4 Moderate vine infestation
Not within the scope of work
13 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 13.5 42 NO 4 Moderate vine infestation
Not within the scope of work
14 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.0 31 NO 4 Moderate
Not within the scope of work
15 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 38 NO 4 Moderate
Not within the scope of work
16 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.8 40 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
17 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 38 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
18 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 29 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
19 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.5 39 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
20 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 38 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
HMH Page 17 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
21 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.6 33 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
22 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.1 32 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
23 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 13.3 42 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
24 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 30 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
25 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.2 29 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
26 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.8 24 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
27 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 29 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
28 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.0 25 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
29 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.9 31 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
30 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.8 24 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
31 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 30 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
32 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.5 27 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
33 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.0 28 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
34 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 29 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
35 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.0 25 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
36 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.3 39 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
37 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 38 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
38 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 30 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
39 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.5 33 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
40 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.6 36 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
HMH Page 18 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
41 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.5 30 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
42 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.2 29 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
43 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.3 32 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
44 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.0 28 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
45 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 30 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
46 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 30 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
47 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.0 35 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
48 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.0 31 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
49 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.2 32 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
50 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.4 36 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
51 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 29 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
52 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.2 32 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
53 Magnolia grandiflora Magnolia 16.5 52 YES 3 Moderate SD Remove 2:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed sidewalk
54 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.5 36 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed curb
55 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.0 31 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk/ramp
56 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.2 23 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
57 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.7 24 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
58 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.5 24 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
59 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.0 25 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
60 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.8 24 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
HMH Page 19 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
61 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.5 27 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
62 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.3 26 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
63 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 6.9 22 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
64 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 6.5 20 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
65 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 6.0 19 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
66 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 13.5 42 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
67 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 38 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
68 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.0 35 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
69 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.6 36 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
70 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 1.4 4 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
71 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 1.6 5 NO 4 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Tree in direct conflict with proposed
sidewalk
72 Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
28.3 89
YES
3 Good
Off site tree, trunk within apx. 3' of
proposed walkway. Excavation and
compaction will negatively effect root
system on that side of tree. Consider
removal of tree.
73 Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
21.4 67
YES
3 Good
Off site tree, trunk within apx. 3' of
proposed walkway and 12-13' of proposed
building. Excavation and compaction will
negatively effect root system on that side of
tree. Consider removal of tree.
74 Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
23.5 74
YES
3 Good
Off site tree, trunk within apx. 3' of
proposed walkway and 12-13' of proposed
building. Excavation and compaction will
negatively effect root system on that side of
tree. Consider removal of tree.
75 Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
19.4 61
YES
3 Good
Off site tree, trunk within apx. 3' of
proposed walkway and 12-13' of proposed
building. Excavation and compaction will
negatively effect root system on that side of
tree. Consider removal of tree.
HMH Page 20 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
76 Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
24.2 76
YES
3 Good
Off site tree, trunk within apx. 3' of
proposed walkway and 12-13' of proposed
building. Excavation and compaction will
negatively effect root system on that side of
tree. Consider removal of tree.
77 Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
20.8 65
YES
3 Good
Off site tree, trunk within apx. 3' of
proposed walkway and 12-13' of proposed
building. Excavation and compaction will
negatively effect root system on that side of
tree. Consider removal of tree.
78 Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
11.6 36
NO
3 Good
Off site tree, trunk within apx. 3' of
proposed walkway and 12-13' of proposed
building. Excavation and compaction will
negatively effect root system on that side of
tree. Consider removal of tree.
79 Ficus carica Fig Tree 20.0 63 YES 3 Poor ST, SD
Not within the scope of work
80 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 22.0 69 YES 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within proposed biotreatment planter and within 5' of proposed building.
81 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 31.0 97 YES 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building 82 Ficus carica Fig Tree 22.0 69 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building 83 Ficus carica Fig Tree 12.0 38 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 84 Ficus carica Fig Tree 16.0 50 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building 85 Diospyros kaki Persimmon Tree 10.0 31 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within 1' of proposed biotreatment planter and 10' of proposed building
86 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 8.0 25 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 87 Ficus carica Fig Tree 18.0 57 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building 88 Punica granatum Pomegranate 10.0 31 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 89 Punica granatum Pomegranate 16.0 50 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within 1' of proposed biotreatment planter and 10' of proposed building
90 Prunus laurocerasus Laural Cherry 10.0 31 NO 2 Poor ST, SD
Not within the scope of work
91 Prunus sp Cherry Tree 8.0 25 NO 2 Poor ST, SD
Not within the scope of work
HMH Page 21 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
92 Ficus carica Fig Tree 12.8 40 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within the proposed driveway 93 Diospyros kaki
Persimmon Tree
19.0 60
YES
3 Poor
ST, SD
Remove
2:1
Within 3' of proposed driveway. Excavation
and compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
94 Diospyros kaki Persimmon Tree 7.0 22 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within the proposed driveway 95 Ficus carica Fig Tree 41.0 129 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within the proposed driveway 96 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 3.0 9 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 97 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 5.0 16 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 98 Prunus persica Peach Tree 3.0 9 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 99 Diospyros kaki Persimmon Tree 18.0 57 YES 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building
100
Morus Sp
Mulberry
60.0 188
YES
3 Moderate
SD Large heavy
branches that are
currently braced
from possible failure
Remove
2:1
Within footprint of proposed building
101 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 10.0 31 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 102 Prunus sp Cherry Tree 2.0 6 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 103 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 6.0 19 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 104 Ficus carica Fig Tree 16.0 50 YES 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building 105 Prunus sp Cherry Tree 5.0 16 NO 3 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 106 Prunus sp Cherry Tree 7.0 22 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 107 Prunus sp Plum Tree 19.0 60 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building 108 Prunus sp Plum Tree 8.0 25 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 109 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 9.0 28 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building HMH Page 22 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
110
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
32.0 100
YES
2 Poor
ST, SD
Remove
2:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
111
Prunus sp
Plum Tree
27.0 85
YES
2 Poor
ST, SD
Remove
2:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
112
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
9.9 31
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
113
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
9.2 29
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
114
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
38.0 119
YES
3 Moderate
Remove
2:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
115
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
11.2 35
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
116
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
9.6 30
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
117
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
11.0 35
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
118
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
11.5 36
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
119
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
9.0 28
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
120
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
14.5 46
NO
3 Moderate
Remove
1:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
121
Casuarina
equisetifolia
Australian Pine
48.0 151
YES
3 Moderate
Remove
2:1
Within 5' of proposed biotreatment planter
and 9' of proposed building. Excavation and
compaction would negatively affect root
system of tree
HMH Page 23 of 27 05/30/24
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
CIRCUM-
FERENCE
HERITAGE TREE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
REMOVE?
RELOCATE?
MITIGATION
REQUIREMENTS
RECOMMENDATIONS
122 Olea europaea Olive Tree 33.0 104 YES 3 Poor ST, SD Relocate Possible relocation. Within footprint of
proposed building.
123 Olea europaea Olive Tree 9.5 30 NO 3 Moderate SD Relocate Possible relocation. Within footprint of
proposed building.
124 Olea europaea Olive Tree 27.0 85 YES 3 Moderate EHW, Decay Relocate Possible relocation. Within footprint of
proposed building.
125 Olea europaea Olive Tree 34.5 108 YES 2 Poor EHW, SD, hollow Relocate Possible relocation. Within footprint of
proposed building.
126 Olea europaea Olive Tree 16.0 50 YES 3 Moderate
Relocate
Possible relocation. Within footprint of
proposed building.
127 Olea europaea Olive Tree 46.0 144 YES 2 Poor Center of tree dead. Remove 2:1 Tree should be removed due to poor health 128 Prunus sp Plum Tree 44.0 138 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Tree within 1' of proposed biotreatment planter and 5' of proposed building.
129 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 10.0 31 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 130 Olea europaea Olive Tree 12.0 38 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 131 Malus sp. Apple Tree 6.0 19 NO 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building 132 Olea europaea Olive Tree 16.0 50 YES 2 Poor ST, SD Remove 2:1 Within footprint of proposed building 133 Malus sp. Apple Tree 8.0 25 NO 3 Moderate
Remove 1:1 Within footprint of proposed building
HMH Page 24 of 27 05/30/24
TABLE 3 - TREE VALUATION TABLE
TREE #
BOTANICAL
NAME
COMMON
NAME
DBH (IN)
CONDITION %
LOCATION %
SPECIES
RATING %
REPLACEMENT
TREE DIAMETER
(IN)
REPLACEMEN
T TREE TRUNK
AREA
(IN^2/CM^2)
REPLACEMENT
TREE COST
INSTALLATION COST
INSTALLED TREE
COST
UNIT TREE
COST
APPRAISED TRUNK
AREA (IN^2/CM^2)
APPRAISED TREE
TRUNK INCREASE
(IN^2/CM^2)
BASIC TREE COST
APPRAISED VALUE
16 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.8 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 128.6144 116.0544 $ 5,096.00 $ 8,561.28 17 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 113.04 100.48 $ 4,600.00 $ 7,728.00 18 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 65.00585 52.44585 $ 3,070.25 $ 5,158.02 19 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 122.65625 110.09625 $ 4,906.25 $ 8,242.50 20 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 113.04 100.48 $ 4,600.00 $ 7,728.00 21 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.6 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 88.2026 75.6426 $ 3,809.00 $ 6,399.12 22 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.1 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 80.07785 67.51785 $ 3,550.25 $ 5,964.42 23 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 13.3 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 138.85865 126.29865 $ 5,422.25 $ 9,109.38 24 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 69.3626 56.8026 $ 3,209.00 $ 5,391.12 25 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.2 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 66.4424 53.8824 $ 3,116.00 $ 5,234.88 26 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.8 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 47.7594 35.1994 $ 2,521.00 $ 4,235.28 27 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 65.00585 52.44585 $ 3,070.25 $ 5,158.02 28 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 50.24 37.68 $ 2,600.00 $ 4,368.00 29 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.9 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 76.93785 64.37785 $ 3,450.25 $ 5,796.42 30 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.8 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 47.7594 35.1994 $ 2,521.00 $ 4,235.28 31 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 69.3626 56.8026 $ 3,209.00 $ 5,391.12 32 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 56.71625 44.15625 $ 2,806.25 $ 4,714.50 33 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 63.585 51.025 $ 3,025.00 $ 5,082.00 34 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 65.00585 52.44585 $ 3,070.25 $ 5,158.02 35 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 50.24 37.68 $ 2,600.00 $ 4,368.00 36 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.3 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 118.76265 106.20265 $ 4,782.25 $ 8,034.18 37 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 113.04 100.48 $ 4,600.00 $ 7,728.00 38 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 69.3626 56.8026 $ 3,209.00 $ 5,391.12 39 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 86.54625 73.98625 $ 3,756.25 $ 6,310.50 40 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.6 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 105.6296 93.0696 $ 4,364.00 $ 7,331.52 41 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 70.84625 58.28625 $ 3,256.25 $ 5,470.50 42 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.2 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 66.4424 53.8824 $ 3,116.00 $ 5,234.88 43 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.3 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 83.28065 70.72065 $ 3,652.25 $ 6,135.78 HMH Page 25 of 27 05/30/24
44 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 63.585 51.025 $ 3,025.00 $ 5,082.00 45 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 69.3626 56.8026 $ 3,209.00 $ 5,391.12 46 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.4 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 69.3626 56.8026 $ 3,209.00 $ 5,391.12 47 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 94.985 82.425 $ 4,025.00 $ 6,762.00 48 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 78.5 65.94 $ 3,500.00 $ 5,880.00 49 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.2 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 81.6714 69.1114 $ 3,601.00 $ 6,049.68 50 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.4 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 102.0186 89.4586 $ 4,249.00 $ 7,138.32 51 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 9.1 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 65.00585 52.44585 $ 3,070.25 $ 5,158.02 52 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.2 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 81.6714 69.1114 $ 3,601.00 $ 6,049.68 53 Magnolia
grandiflora Magnolia 16.5 0.6 0.5 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 213.71625 201.15625 $ 7,806.25 $ 4,683.75 54 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 103.81625 91.25625 $ 4,306.25 $ 7,234.50 55 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 10.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 78.5 65.94 $ 3,500.00 $ 5,880.00 56 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.2 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 40.6944 28.1344 $ 2,296.00 $ 3,857.28 57 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.7 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 46.54265 33.98265 $ 2,482.25 $ 4,170.18 58 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 44.15625 31.59625 $ 2,406.25 $ 4,042.50 59 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 50.24 37.68 $ 2,600.00 $ 4,368.00 60 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 7.8 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 47.7594 35.1994 $ 2,521.00 $ 4,235.28 61 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 56.71625 44.15625 $ 2,806.25 $ 4,714.50 62 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 8.3 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 54.07865 41.51865 $ 2,722.25 $ 4,573.38 63 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 6.9 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 37.37385 24.81385 $ 2,190.25 $ 3,679.62 64 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 6.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 33.16625 20.60625 $ 2,056.25 $ 3,454.50 65 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 6.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 28.26 15.7 $ 1,900.00 $ 3,192.00 66 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 13.5 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 143.06625 130.50625 $ 5,556.25 $ 9,334.50 67 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 12.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 113.04 100.48 $ 4,600.00 $ 7,728.00 68 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.0 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 94.985 82.425 $ 4,025.00 $ 6,762.00 69 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 11.6 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 105.6296 93.0696 $ 4,364.00 $ 7,331.52 70 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 1.4 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 1.5386 -11.0214 $ 1,049.00 $ 1,762.32 71 Cupressus
sempervirens Italian Cypress 1.6 0.8 0.7 3 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 2.0096 -10.5504 $ 1,064.00 $ 1,787.52 80 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 22.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 379.94 367.38 $ 13,100.00 $ 11,004.00 81 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 31.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 754.385 741.825 $ 25,025.00 $ 21,021.00 82 Ficus carica Fig Tree 22.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 379.94 367.38 $ 13,100.00 $ 7,336.00 83 Ficus carica Fig Tree 12.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 113.04 100.48 $ 4,600.00 $ 2,576.00 84 Ficus carica Fig Tree 16.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 200.96 188.4 $ 7,400.00 $ 4,144.00 HMH Page 26 of 27 05/30/24
85 Diospyros kaki Persimmon
Tree 10.0 0.6 0.7 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 78.5 65.94 $ 3,500.00 $ 1,470.00 86 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 8.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 50.24 37.68 $ 2,600.00 $ 1,456.00 87 Ficus carica Fig Tree 18.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 254.34 241.78 $ 9,100.00 $ 5,096.00 88 Punica granatum Pomegranate 10.0 0.4 0.7 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 78.5 65.94 $ 3,500.00 $ 980.00 89 Punica granatum Pomegranate 16.0 0.4 0.7 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 200.96 188.4 $ 7,400.00 $ 2,072.00 92 Ficus carica Fig Tree 12.8 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 128.6144 116.0544 $ 5,096.00 $ 2,853.76 93 Diospyros kaki Persimmon
Tree 19.0 0.6 0.7 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 283.385 270.825 $ 10,025.00 $ 4,210.50 94 Diospyros kaki Persimmon
Tree 7.0 0.6 0.7 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 38.465 25.905 $ 2,225.00 $ 934.50 95 Ficus carica Fig Tree 41.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 1319.585 1307.025 $ 43,025.00 $ 24,094.00 96 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 3.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 7.065 -5.495 $ 1,225.00 $ 686.00 97 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 5.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 19.625 7.065 $ 1,625.00 $ 1,365.00 98 Prunus persica Peach Tree 3.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 7.065 -5.495 $ 1,225.00 $ 1,029.00 99 Diospyros kaki Persimmon
Tree 18.0 0.6 0.7 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 254.34 241.78 $ 9,100.00 $ 3,822.00 100 Morus Sp Mulberry 60.0 0.6 0.8 4 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 2826 2813.44 $ 91,000.00 $ 174,720.00 101 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 10.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 78.5 65.94 $ 3,500.00 $ 2,940.00 102 Prunus sp Cherry Tree 2.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 3.14 -9.42 $ 1,100.00 $ 924.00 103 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 6.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 28.26 15.7 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,596.00 104 Ficus carica Fig Tree 16.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 200.96 188.4 $ 7,400.00 $ 6,216.00 105 Prunus sp Cherry Tree 5.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 19.625 7.065 $ 1,625.00 $ 1,365.00 106 Prunus sp Cherry Tree 7.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 38.465 25.905 $ 2,225.00 $ 1,246.00 107 Prunus sp Plum Tree 19.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 283.385 270.825 $ 10,025.00 $ 5,614.00 108 Prunus sp Plum Tree 8.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 50.24 37.68 $ 2,600.00 $ 1,456.00 109 Pyrus sp. Pear Tree 9.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 63.585 51.025 $ 3,025.00 $ 1,694.00 110
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 32.0 0.4 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 803.84 791.28 $ 26,600.00 $ 17,024.00 111 Prunus sp Plum Tree 27.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 572.265 559.705 $ 19,225.00 $ 10,766.00 112
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 9.9 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 76.93785 64.37785 $ 3,450.25 $ 3,312.24 113
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 9.2 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 66.4424 53.8824 $ 3,116.00 $ 2,991.36 114
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 38.0 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 1133.54 1120.98 $ 37,100.00 $ 35,616.00 115
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 11.2 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 98.4704 85.9104 $ 4,136.00 $ 3,970.56 116
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 9.6 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 72.3456 59.7856 $ 3,304.00 $ 3,171.84 117
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 11.0 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 94.985 82.425 $ 4,025.00 $ 3,864.00 118
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 11.5 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 103.81625 91.25625 $ 4,306.25 $ 4,134.00 119
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 9.0 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 63.585 51.025 $ 3,025.00 $ 2,904.00 120
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 14.5 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 165.04625 152.48625 $ 6,256.25 $ 6,006.00 121
Casuarina
equisetifolia Australian Pine 48.0 0.6 0.8 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 1808.64 1796.08 $ 58,600.00 $ 56,256.00 HMH Page 27 of 27 05/30/24
122 Olea europaea Olive Tree 33.0 0.6 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 854.865 842.305 $ 28,225.00 $ 13,548.00 123 Olea europaea Olive Tree 9.5 0.6 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 70.84625 58.28625 $ 3,256.25 $ 1,563.00 124 Olea europaea Olive Tree 27.0 0.6 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 572.265 559.705 $ 19,225.00 $ 9,228.00 125 Olea europaea Olive Tree 34.5 0.4 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 934.34625 921.78625 $ 30,756.25 $ 9,842.00 126 Olea europaea Olive Tree 16.0 0.6 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 200.96 188.4 $ 7,400.00 $ 3,552.00 127 Olea europaea Olive Tree 46.0 0.4 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 1661.06 1648.5 $ 53,900.00 $ 17,248.00 128 Prunus sp Plum Tree 44.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 1519.76 1507.2 $ 49,400.00 $ 27,664.00 129 Citrus sp. Citrus Tree 10.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 78.5 65.94 $ 3,500.00 $ 1,960.00 130 Olea europaea Olive Tree 12.0 0.4 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 113.04 100.48 $ 4,600.00 $ 1,472.00 131 Malus sp. Apple Tree 6.0 0.4 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 28.26 15.7 $ 1,900.00 $ 1,064.00 132 Olea europaea Olive Tree 16.0 0.4 0.8 1 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 200.96 188.4 $ 7,400.00 $ 2,368.00 133 Malus sp. Apple Tree 8.0 0.6 0.7 2 4 12.56 $ 400.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 31.85 50.24 37.68 $ 2,600.00 $ 2,184.00 The valuations were done using the Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers Trunk Formula method.