*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
In founding their new company, Noyce and Moore worked with venture capitalist Arthur Rock, who had also backed Fairchild at its beginning, to raise the $2.5 million in startup funds, as well as contributing some of their own resources.24 As “Intel” was already the name of a hotel chain in the midwestern United States, Moore and Noyce purchased the right to use the name for $15,000, and thus NM Electronics became Intel, short for Integrated Electronics. On August 1, 1968, Intel moved into 365 E. Middlefield Road, which they leased after Union Carbide Corporation left the building. With Noyce and Moore working out of the conference room, this building served as Intel’s first headquarters (Error! Reference source not found.).25 Bob Noyce was the first Chief Executive Officer, Gordon Moore was the Executive Vice President, and Arthur Rock served as Chairman of Intel. .
Figure 18: Intel staff outside of 365 E. Middlefield Road in 1968. Courtesy of the Computer History Museum.
Figure 19: Newspaper clipping announcing the founding
of Intel. San Jose Mercury News, August 6, 1968.
Stan Mazor, who worked for Fairchild and was recruited to Intel in 1969, described the working conditions at the first headquarters in an interview with the Computer History Museum in 2007: “We were located at 365 Middlefield. It was an extremely small building, and my office had three desks in it.”26 The 30,000 square foot manufacturing facility was a tight working space with furnishings left behind by the previous tenants, Union Carbide. Bob Noyce estimated that a meeting could be called by yelling to a colleague who would be less than 20 steps away from the crammed offices.27 They used a long table to set up their
24 Molella, Arthur P. and Anna Karvellas, Places of Invention, Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press: 2015, 23. 25 Intel 35 Year Anniversary, Intel Corporation, 2003.
26 “Oral History Panel on the Development and Promotion of the Intel 4004 Microprocessor,” Stan Mazor interviewed by Dave House, Computer History Museum, April 25, 2007.
27 Leslie Berlin, The Man Behind the Microchip: Robert Noyce and the Invention of Silicon Valley (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008), 169.
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________
*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
“communication center,” and the “cafeteria” consisted of vending machine food. Union Carbide had left the fabrication area in the rear in disarray; pipes sticking out of the ceiling, wires along the walls, and holes in the floor. Gene Flath, a product engineer, was tasked with acquiring custom equipment and materials for Intel’s new “fab” area. Noyce and Moore changed the way developing and manufacturing the types of chips and devices Intel made had been done up until that point. Rather than operating two separate facilities, they “co-located” development and manufacturing to ensure that they did not waste time and effort in developing devices that could not practically be built.
Figure 20: QA Inspection workers, 1969. Intel Museum
Silicon Valley History Online Collection. Online Archive of California.
Figure 21: Monitoring furnace banks, 1969. Intel Museum Silicon Valley History Online Collection. Online Archive of California.
Intel’s first product was the 3101 Schottky bipolar random-access memory (RAM), produced beginning in April 1969. RAM serves as the main memory in a computer, storing working data and code. A bipolar transistor allows the device to be able to switch or amplify currents. The 3101 RAM was an important development because of its speed and large memory capacity. The same year, Intel also developed the world’s first commercial chip to use a metal oxide semiconductor (MOS), the 1101 static RAM.28 A static RAM does not have to be refreshed as often as other RAM, so it has a higher performance rate and lower power usage. This chip relied on silicon gates instead of metal, changing semiconductor technology across the industry. Intel described the advance in an article published in 2018 to reflect on their first products at their 50th anniversary:
The process technology developed for the 1101 became the industry standard and a key revenue source for Intel. And while Intel’s first product, the 3101, had already established the company’s ability to improve on established technologies and manufacturing processes, the 1101 established the company’s ability to develop industry-changing new ones.29
Semiconductor memory chips had been developed prior to Intel’s production, but Intel was the first company to mass produced the devices on a commercial level. In 1970, the 1103 DRAM was announced for commercial use, changing industry standards for computer memory as the world’s first dynamic random-access memory chip. 30 All computers today have RAM, and DRAM is popular in modern computers. In 1969, Frederico Faggin, Ted Hoff, and Stanley Mazor of Intel began developing a custom set of chips for calculator company, Busicom, including the 4001 program memory chip, the 4002 data memory chip, the 4003 peripheral interface chip, and the 4004 CPU chip, which together comprised the MCS-4 chip set. 31 The chip designs were completed in 1970, and the working chips were given to Busicom in March 1971. Intel began selling the chips in November of 1971. The Intel 4004 was the world’s first microprocessor, serving as a complete CPU on a single chip.32 Intel developed and produced the 3101, 1101, 1103, and 4000 series chips during their time headquartered at the subject property at 365 E. Middlefield Road.
28 “Intel’s Founding,” Intel, Accessed June 16, 2022, https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/history/virtual-vault/articles/intels-founding.html. 29 “Intel at 50: Intel’s 1101,” Intel Newsroom, accessed June 22, 2022, https://newsroom.intel.com/news/intel-50-intels-1101/. 30 Intel 35 Year Anniversary, Intel Corporation, 2003.
31 Stephen Cass, “Chip Hall of Fame: Intel 4004 Microprocessor,” July 2, 2018, Accessed July 5, 2022, https://spectrum.ieee.org/chip-hall-of-fame- intel-4004-microprocessor.
32Stephen Cass, “Chip Hall of Fame: Intel 4004 Microprocessor.”
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________
*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
In 1971, Intel required more space than available at its facility at 365 E. Middlefield Road and moved to a larger property in Santa Clara. That year, Intel went public and celebrated its first $1 million month.33 The following year, Intel opened its first international factory to help produce their growing variety of computer chips and processors. By its 10-year anniversary in 1978, Intel had 10,000 employees. As of 1979, Gordon Moore served as Intel Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, with Bob Noyce as the Vice Chairman, and Andy Grove as president and Chief Operating Officer. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, Intel opened factories and offices in Arizona, Barbados, Oregon, Israel, and the Philippines.34 In a 2014 history of the company’s development, author Michael Malone describes the growth of Intel in the 1980s as follows:
In 1980, Intel set out to do what seemed impossible: to be the industry’s leading supplier and leading innovator at the same time. In pursuit of this wildly ambitious goal, the company took advantage of the good times to embark on a frenzy of activity. In that year alone, the company opened a Hong Kong subsidiary and a fab plant in Puerto Rico, even as it closed its original Mountain View fab. The company also installed a massive new order-processing system to deal with the exploding demand for its products.35
In 1983, the company passed $1 billion in annual revenue for the first time. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, Intel grew at a steady rate and soon became a household name. In 1992, Intel was the largest semiconductor supplier in the world, according to Dataquest.36 Intel celebrated its 35th anniversary in 2003, the year it shipped its 1 billionth processor.
Suburban Corporate & Technology Developments
Suburban corporate development began in American cities in the 1940s, and became increasingly popular in the decades following World War II as large corporations, particularly those with large research and development functions, looked for space to expand their facilities. With the rise in automobile ownership and commuter transit systems, as well as the perceived ills of urban life— pollution, congestion, crime, and so on— a growing number of white collar workers were buying homes in the suburbs.
Corporations also saw advantages of the suburbs with large swaths of cheaper available land and proximity to the suburban workforce. Unlike large industrial facilities, these corporate campuses were largely dedicated to office headquarters, laboratories, and research and development activities, so-called “smokeless” industries, which were seen as compatible with the surrounding middle class residential areas. In addition to extensive parking for employees, these corporate campuses were set in designed landscapes to create a parklike or pastoral atmosphere.
In her book Pastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes, Louise A. Mozingo, landscape architect and professor at University of California, Berkeley, has identified three typologies of suburban corporate workplaces:
• Corporate Campus – The corporate campus, which first appeared in the 1940s, was purpose-built and designed in the manner of a university campus with buildings organized around a landscaped quad and “provided facilities for a singular division of middle management: corporate research. The corporate campus initiated the shift of white-collar work into pastoral suburban settings.”37 One example is the 1956 General Motors Technical Center in Warren, Michigan, designed by architect Eero Saarinen and landscape architect Thomas Church. • Corporate Estate – The corporate estate, which arose in the early 1950s, “consisted of an imposing building complex arrived at by a coursing entry drive through a scenically designed landscape of 200 acres or more.”38 Like corporate campuses, corporate estates were purpose-built for a specific company. An example is the 1971 Weyerhaeuser Corporate Headquarters outside of Tacoma, Washington designed by architects Skidmore, Owings & Merrill and landscape architect Peter Walker of Sasaki, Walker and Associates. • Office Park – The office park, developed in the 1950s, provided a “lower-cost, flexible alterative to the corporate campus and estate. The office park scheme provided lots for office buildings, each encircled by a pool of parking, a matrix of landscape edges, medians, and verges that provided suburban consistency.”39 Developers could sell, lease, or build to provide offices to a number of different companies. The subject property at 355-365 E. Middlefield Road is located in an area of 1960s suburban corporate growth which most closely fits this type of development. Another example is the 1951 Stanford Industrial Park, now known as the Stanford Research Park, in Palo Alto, which includes buildings for a variety of companies designed by different architects.
33 Intel 35 Year Anniversary, Intel Corporation, 2003.
34 Intel 35 Year Anniversary, Intel Corporation, 2003.
35Michael Malone, The Intel Trinity: How Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, and Andy Grove Built the World’s Most Important Computer, Harper Collins New York: 2014, 322.
36 Intel 35 Year Anniversary, Intel Corporation, 2003.
37 Louise A. Mozingo, Pastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes, (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2011), 12. 38 Mozingo, Pastoral Capitalism, 12.
39 Mozingo, Pastoral Capitalism, 13.
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________
*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
Numerous suburban corporate workplaces were constructed in Silicon Valley beginning in the late 1960s with increasing pervasiveness in the 1970s. An essay on the history of the corporate campus in Silicon Valley for The Urbanist, the publication of non-profit urban and regional planning policy organization SPUR, observes:
[…] these facilities were located near major research universities to capture a highly educated workforce for companies that would commercialize academic innovation, develop new technologies and conduct government and defense research. It was a winning formula, as academics and technology entrepreneurs formed formidable clusters of companies, opportunities and ideas. In various ways, research parks replicated the suburban planning and design controls pioneered in the city of Menlo Park in 1948, deliberately presenting an alternative to industrial factories, where most research and development functions had traditionally been housed. [By the 1970s] It became increasingly important for national technology firms to establish a presence in Silicon Valley.
The Peninsula was primed for its explosive growth as the global center of technological innovation — all in a postwar suburban environment that was socially homogeneous, spatially dispersed and utterly dependent on the private automobile.40
Table 5 provides examples of some of the earliest purpose-built corporate campuses, estates, and office parks developed for technology firms in Silicon Valley. Among those which have been demolished is the building Intel constructed in 1970 to accommodate their growing company.
Table 5. Early corporate development locations in Silicon Valley. Shaded entries shaded red have been demolished.
Year Built Corporate Workplace City Architect/Landscape Architect 1951 Sunset Magazine Menlo Park Cliff May / Thomas Church 1953 Varian Associates at Stanford Industrial
Park
Palo Alto Erich Mendelsohn and Michael Gallis /
Thomas Church
1954-
1970s
Hewlett-Packard at Stanford Industrial
Park
Palo Alto Clark & Stromquist /Thomas Church,
Royston, Hanamoto & Mayes
1956-58 IBM Building 25 at Cottle Road San Jose John S. Bolles / Douglas Baylis 1964 IBM Advanced Systems Development
System Los Gatos Laboratory
San Jose Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum /
Lawrence Halprin
1967 Hewlett-Packard Mountain View Division
(formerly Datamec Corporation)
Mountain
View
1968,
1975
Hewlett-Packard Santa Clara Division Santa Clara Clark, Stromquist, Potter & Ehrlich / Royston, Hanamoto, Beck & Abey
1968 Varian Associates factory at VALLCO
Business & Industrial Park
Cupertino Rockrise & Watson
c. 1968 Fairchild Semiconductors Mountain
View
Simpson, Stratta & Associates
1969 HP Cupertino Division at VALLCO
Business & Industrial Park
Cupertino Not available.
1970 Xerox Palo Alto Research Center (PARC) Palo Alto Hellmuth, Obata & Kassabaum 1970 Intel Corporation SC1 Building Santa Clara
1971 Memorex Corporation Research Facility Santa Clara Simpson, Stratta & Associates 1972 National Semiconductor Corporation (now
Texas Instruments)
Santa Clara Dennis A. Kobaza & Associates
1973 Alza Headquarters Palo Alto McCue Boone Tomsick
1974 Moffett Park Sunnyvale
1977 IBM Santa Teresa Laboratory San Jose McCue Boone Tomsick / Sasaki, Walker & Associates
1970s Digital Equipment Corporations Santa Clara Gensler & Associates 1980 Qume Corporation Santa Clara Hawley & Peterson
1983 IBM Almaden Valley Research Laboratory San Jose McCue Boone Tomsick
40 Benjamin Grant, “The Corporate Campus: A Local History,” The Urbanist 553 (September 2016), accessed online February 9, 2021, https://www.spur.org/publications/urbanist-article/2016-09-21/corporate-campus-local-history.
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________
*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
Significance Evaluation
California Register of Historical Resources
In order for a property to be considered eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), the property must possess significance and retain integrity to convey that significance. The criteria for significance are:
Criterion 1 (Events): Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States.
355-365 E. Middlefield Road appears to be significant under Criterion 1 for its association with the early operation of Intel.
Constructed in 1964 during an early period of suburban corporate growth in the city, 355-365 E. Middlefield Road was built as an industrial office building first occupied by Union Carbide. Intel occupied the building from 1968-1971, during the first three years of the company’s life. During this period of occupancy of 355-365 E. Middlefield Road, Intel developed and produced commercial memory chips and microprocessors which contributed significantly to the advancement of computing technology, including groundbreaking memory chips. 355-365 E. Middlefield Road is documented in numerous publications as the first location of Intel, and was an important location in the company’s history. In addition, as the company’s subsequent building in Santa Clara, built in 1970, has been demolished, the subject property is a rare remaining physical location associated with the now-global company’s early history. The period of significance for 355-365 E. Middlefield Road is 1968-1971, corresponding to the years of occupation by Intel.
Criterion 2 (Persons): Associated with the lives of persons important to local, California or national history.
355-365 E. Middlefield Road does not appear to be individually significant under Criterion 2. Bob Noyce and Gordon Moore founded Intel in 1968, and held critical roles in its evolution over the years. Frederico Faggin, Ted Hoff, and Stanley Mazor were the primary engineers who worked on some of Intel’s early projects. All of these individuals contributed to the advancements in technology for which Intel is historically significant under Criterion 1. However, the subject building was not found to be strongly associated with any of these individuals in particular; rather it was directly associated with the significant operations of the company as a whole. As such, the contribution made by these individuals is more appropriately included in the building’s significance under Criterion 1. Research did not identify other individuals associated with prior or subsequent occupations of the subject property who appear to have made significant contributions to local, State, or national history.
Criterion 3 (Architecture): Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values:
355-365 E. Middlefield Road does not appear to be individually significant under Criterion 3. 355-365 E. Middlefield Road is an industrial office building that was constructed in 1964 by an unknown architect and/or builder. Though an example of suburban corporate development in Santa Clara County, the building is of a simple commercial-industrial type constructed with common materials and using common methods of the mid-1960s. The building is not an example of a component of a cohesive early corporate campus or estate. It does not possess features that are highly representative of a particular architectural style. The building does not provide and exceptional or influential example of a particular style, and is not identified as the work of an influential or master-level design professional. The building does not embody the aesthetic ideal of any particular type or style to a high degree, relatively to other examples in the region, such that it would possess high artistic value.
Criterion 4 (Information Potential): Has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation.
The property at 355-365 E. Middlefield Road does not appear to be individually significant under Criterion 4 as a building or property that has the potential to provide information important to the prehistory or history of the City of Mountain View, state, or nation. It does not feature construction or material types, or embody engineering practices that would, with additional study, provide important information. Evaluation of this property was limited to age-eligible resources above ground and did not involve survey or evaluation of the subject property for the purposes of archaeological information.
Mountain View Register of Historic Resources
According to City of Mountain View Municipal Code Section 36.54.65, a building, structure, site, or other improvement must meet one or more of the following criteria for designation by City Council as a historic resource to be placed on the Mountain View Register.
a) Is strongly identified with a person who, or an organization which, significantly contributed to the culture, history or development of the City of Mountain View;
b) Is the site of a significant historic event in the city's past; DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________
*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
c) Embodies distinctive characteristics significant to the city in terms of a type, period, region or method of construction or representative of the work of a master or possession of high artistic value; or
d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to the city's prehistory or history.
These criteria closely follow those defined for eligibility for listing in the California Register, as discussed above. As Page & Turnbull finds that the property at 355-365 E. Middlefield Road is directly associated with significant events in Mountain View’s history, the property does appear to be eligible for listing as a historic resource in the Mountain View Register under Criterion B. 365 E. Middlefield Road was the location of Intel Corporation’s first headquarters, beginning in 1968. During their time at Middlefield Road, Intel made several important products which were widely influential in technological development through the following decades. Intel was an integral part of the rise of Silicon Valley in Santa Clara County and the city of Mountain View.
Integrity
To qualify for listing in any local, state, or national historic register, a property or landscape must possess significance under at least one evaluative criterion, as described earlier, and retain integrity. Integrity is defined by the California Office of Historic Preservation as “the authenticity of a historical resource’s physical identity by the survival of certain characteristics that existing during the resource’s period of significance,” or more simply defined as “the ability of a property to convey its significance.”
Location: The building on the subject property remains in its original location since its construction in 1964. Thus, the property retains integrity of the location.
Setting: The subject property was historically located in a neighborhood characterized primarily by industrial office buildings constructed in the mid-20th century. Although some buildings from this period have been altered or replaced with new buildings, overall, the surrounding neighborhood retains its historic character. Thus, the property retains integrity of setting.
Design: The building on the subject property is a commercial-industrial building that was designed and built with common materials of the period, lending the overall appearance vernacular qualities. The building continues to display characteristics of its original design, such as being a one-story rectangular mass building with a symmetrical primary façade, generally uniform fenestration, projecting front corners, a flat roof, and stucco exterior. There have been minor alterations, such as the removal of original primary façade decorative panels and addition of a roll up door. Despite these alterations, the property remains able overall to convey its character as a commercial-industrial building. Thus, the property retains integrity of design.
Materials: The building on the property retains most of its historic materials that were part of the original design, such as the stucco cladding that is on all exterior facades and metal-frame windows. Thus, the property retains integrity of materials.
Workmanship: The building at 355-365 E. Middlefield Road displays elements that demonstrate the workmanship that contributed to its design, including the stucco cladding, metal-frame (storefront) windows and glazed doors. All of these elements remain intact.
Thus, the property retains integrity of workmanship.
Feeling: The subject property continues to impart the feeling of a commercial-industrial building built in 1964. Thus, the property retains integrity of feeling.
Association: Through its retention of integrity of location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, and feeling, the subject property continues to convey its significance as a commercial industrial building designed in the mid-twentieth century. Thus, the property retains integrity of association.
In sum, 355-365 E. Middlefield Road retains all seven aspects of integrity. Although there have been small alterations over time, these alterations have a minor effect on the design integrity of this building and do not result in a total loss of integrity for this building or property as a whole.
Character-Defining Features
The character- defining features of 355-365 E. Middlefield Road and its site include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Rectangular massing
• One-story height with flat roof
• Large storefront windows
• Stucco exterior
• Parking lot and driveway
• Projecting northeast and northwest corners
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________
*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
Conclusion
The property at 355-365 E Middlefield Road appears to be individually eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources under Criterion 1 for its association with the early development of Intel, and the company’s technological advances made while occupying the building. It appears individually eligible for listing in the Mountain View Register of Historic Resources.
The California Historical Resource Status Code (CHRSC) of 3CS has been assigned to the property, meaning “Appears eligible for CR individually through survey evaluation.”41
B.12 References
Archives & Architecture, LLC. County of Santa Clara Historic Context Statement. County of Santa Clara Department of Planning and Development. Revised February 2012.
“A Brief History of Santa Clara.” City of Santa Clara.
A Region of Health and Prosperity: Mountain View. Mountain View: Board of Trade, 1903.
Bean, Walton and James Rawls. California: An Interpretive History. New York: McGraw Hill, 2003.
Berlin, Leslie. The Man Behind the Microchip: Robert Noyce and the Invention of Silicon Valley. New York: Oxford University Press. 2008.
California State Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation. Technical Assistance Bulletin #8: User’s Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historical Resource Inventory Directory. Sacramento.
November 2004.
Cass, Stephen. “Chip Hall of Fame: Intel 4004 Microprocessor.” July 2, 2018. Accessed July 5, 2022. https://spectrum.ieee.org/chip-hall-of-fame-intel-4004-microprocessor. “Economic History.” National Park Service. January 16, 2018. accessed online January 18. https://www.nps.gov/articles/economic- history.htm.
Hoover, Mildred. Historic Spots in California. Stanford University Press, 2002.
Ignoffo, Mary Jo. Milestones: A History of Mountain View, California. Cupertino, CA: California History Center & Foundation, 2002.
“Intel at 50: Intel’s 1101.” Intel Newsroom. accessed June 22, 2022. https://newsroom.intel.com/news/intel-50-intels-1101/. “Intel’s Founding.” Intel. Accessed June 16, 2022. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/history/virtual-vault/articles/intels- founding.html.
Intel 35 Year Anniversary. Intel Corporation. 2003.
Lecuyer, Christophe. “Making Silicon Valley: Engineering Culture, Innovation, and Industrial Growth, 1930-1970.” Enterprise & Society 2, no. 4. December 2001.
Malone, Michael. The Intel Trinity: How Robert Noyce, Gordon Moore, and Andy Grove Built the World’s Most Important Computer.
Harper Collins New York: 2014.
Mazurek, Jan. Making Microchips: Policy, Globalization, and Economic Restructuring in the Semiconductor Industry. MIT Press, 2003.
Molella, Arthur P. and Anna Karvellas. Places of Invention. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press: 2015.
Mosier, Page. "A Brief History of Population Growth in the Greater San Francisco Bay Region," in Geology & Natural History of the San Francisco Bay Area: A Field-Trip Guidebook. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2188. ed. Philip W. Stoffer and Leslie C. Gordon. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 2001.
“Oral History Panel on the Development and Promotion of the Intel 4004 Microprocessor.” Stan Mazor interviewed by Dave House.
Computer History Museum. April 25, 2007.
41 California State Office of Historic Preservation Department of Parks and Recreation, Technical Assistance Bulletin #8: User’s Guide to the California Historical Resource Status Codes & Historical Resource Inventory Directory, Sacramento, November 2004.
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________
*Recorded by Sarah Kefalas, Stacy Kozakavich, Page & Turnbull, Inc. *Date June 7, 2022 Continuation Update
DPR 523L
Saxenian, Annalice. "The Origins and Business Culture of Silicon Valley." in Major Problems in California History. cd. Sucheng Chan and Spencer Olin. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 1997.
Starr, Kevin. Endangered Dreams: The Great Depression in California. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Valley Title Company. Lease. Santa Clara County Assessor Office. December 1, 1965.
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 1250 W MIDDLEFIELD RD City: Mountain View Zip: 94043-3113 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15314003 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Late Modern Plan Shape: Rectangle
Construction Type: Reinforced Concrete Number of Stories: 1 Roof Style: Flat with Parapet Roof Material: Not Visible Exterior Material: Bush-hammered concrete Primary Door Material: Fully Glazed Window Style: Storefront Window Material: Metal
Porch: Portico Garage: Surface Parking Lot
Other Architectural/Site Features: Flared concrete piers; an interior, open courtyard, not visible from the public right-of-way; and non- original projecting stuccoed colonnade entrance.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP6. 1-3 story commercial building *P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
April 26, 2024
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1969; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
NEW COMMUNITY BAPTIST CH, 1250 W
MIDDLEFIELD RD, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94043
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 1250 W MIDDLEFIELD RD
B1. Historic Name: Spectra-Physics Inc.
B2. Common Name: New Community Baptist Church
B3. Original Use: T ech/Corporate Office Park B4. Present Use: Religious *B5. Architectural Style: Late Modern
*B6. Construction History:
The construction of 1250 W Middlefield Road broke ground in 1966 and the building was opened as a manufacturing plant for Spectra-Physics by early 1969. From analysis of Google Street View data, the building has been used as a church since at least 2007.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Simpson, Stratta & Associates b. Builder: Swinerton and Walberg Co. *B10. Significance: Theme: T echnology & Innovation - Birth of Silicon Valley (1945-1979) Area: Mountain View
Period of Significance: 1969 Property Type: T ech/Corporate Office Park Applicable NR/CR Criteria: A/1 (Events) Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion b (Events), MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
The property is a Late Modern style former manufacturing plant, now used as a church, located in the Rex Manor neighborhood and associated with the theme of T echnology & Innovation-Birth of Silicon Valley (1945-1979) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. The property opened in 1969 as the first purpose-built manufacturing plant for the local research and development company Spectra-Physics, founded in 1961 and known for developing the first commercial laser. Spectra-Physics continued to occupy the building until approximately the 1990s. The building was designed by the architecture firm Simpson, Stratta & Associates of San Francisco, a notable local firm credited with designing many of Silicon Valley's important research and development o ffice and facilities buildings, including a Plating Division Facility for the Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation in Mountain View (demolished). 1250 Middle field Road is located within a 56-acre o ffice park along N. Shoreline Boulevard and T erra Bella Avenue that was developed in the early 1960s by Mountain View Industrial Park Inc. and was home to other prominent research and development companies.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
None
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
Known alterations include the front colonnade entryway, likely added when the building was converted to church, and a second-story addition that is setback from the main facades and occupies less than a quarter of the roof.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The subject building appears eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, and Mountain View Register under Criterion A/1/b for its association with the important development of Mountain View's technology and innovation sector and as the primary manufacturing plant for Spectra-Physics, which paved the way for commercially viable lasers. The building also appears eligible for listing in the Mountain View Register under Criterion c as a good local example of Late Modern architecture and the work of notable local architecture firm Simpson, Stratta & Associates. Due to the addition of the entry portico, the second floor, and alterations to the entryway, the property does not retain sufficient historic integrity for listing in the National Register and the California Register under Criterion C/3. However, the building retains sufficient integrity for local designation under Criterion c. The building also retains integrity of location, setting, feeling, and association, along with sufficient elements of design and materials to convey its significance for technological innovation under Criterion A/1/b. The period of significance is 1969, the year of construction.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall rectangular form and one-story massing
Flared concrete piers
Bush hammered concrete wall panels
Cast concrete rectilinear block parapet and flat roof.
Continuation of B12. References:
“Spectra-Physics Begins $1 Million Job: Architects Simpson, Stratta and Associates of San Francisco Designed the New Manufacturing Plant.” Palo Alto Times, October 25, 1966, 6.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 1855 MIRAMONTE AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94040-4029 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 19329003 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Tudor Revival/English Cottage Plan Shape: Irregular Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 2.5
Roof Style: Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Stucco Primary Door Material: Wood
Window Style: Bay Window, Casement Window Material: Aluminum, Wood Porch: None Garage: Carport
Other Architectural/Site Features: Subject (front) building, described above, has an approximately H-plan footprint with an additional front (west) wing and steeply pitched gable roofs. The east half of the parcel is occupied by two-story multi-family Neo-Tudor Revival style buildings constructed c. 2010 arranged around a central courtyard. A driveway extends from Miramonte Avenue, over a bridge with brick walls crossing Permenante Creek, to a circular driveway just west of the center of the property. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP3. Multiple family property *P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1927; The Peninsula Times Tribune, March 12,
1927.
*P7. Owner and Address:
MINISTRY SERVICES OF THE DAUGHTERS, 26000
ALTAMONT RD, LOS ALTOS HILLS CA 94022
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 1855 MIRAMONTE AV
B1. Historic Name: Wright Residence
B2. Common Name: Sister's House; Villa Siena Senior Living Community B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Multi-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival/English Cottage *B6. Construction History: The subject building was originally constructed in 1927, situated at the center of the current parcel. The building was originally surrounded by apricot orchards, and featured a garden designed by Thomas Church in in 1938. By the early 1970s, a senior living facility constructed new residential buildings on the parcel to the north and east of the subject building.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved?
No ✓ Yes Unknown Date: 2009-
2011
Original
Location:
Center of same parcel and rotated 90 degrees
counterclockwise
*B8. Related Features: Bridge with brick walls over Permanente Creek along Miramonte Avenue; mature trees B9a. Architect: Charles McKenzie b. Builder: The Minton Company *B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1927 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: C/3 (Design) Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
The property was developed as a single-family residence, designed in the Tudor Revival style, in what is now known as the Cuesta Park neighborhood, and is associated with the theme of Residential Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement.
The building was originally designed by San Jose architect of merit Charles McKenzie and built by the Minton Company for William and Nellie Wright in 1927. William Wright was a real estate broker in Mountain View, and one of the founders of the First National Bank of Mountain View. Research was unable to con firm how much, if any, of the orchard on the subject property was used for commercial purposes by the Wrights. The Wrights lived at the property until 1948. In the 1970s, the property was purchased by the present owners, Villa Sienna, and converted into a senior living facility with additional new facilities.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
HP19. Bridge
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
The property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
In a multi-year project beginning in 2009, the building was temporarily moved slightly to the southwest before being moved and rotated to its current location at the northwest corner of the parcel in 2011. The Church-designed landscape was demolished at this time, although a few individual mature trees may remain. New Neo-Tudor Revival style buildings for senior housing were constructed. Some individual windows on the original residence appear to have been replaced.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The former Wright Residence appears to be eligible for the National Register, California Register, and Mountain View Historic Register under Criterion C/3/c as an excellent local example of the Tudor Revival style designed by architect of merit Charles McKenzie. The property does not appear to be individually eligible for listing under any other criteria. The period of significance is 1927, the year of construction. Despite alterations such as the relocation of the building on its original property, the replacement of some windows, and the demolition of the original orchards and gardens that surrounded the building, the property appears to retain integrity of design, materials, and workmanship, which are most essential to convey architectural significance. The building appears to retain sufficient overall historic integrity for listing in the National Register. California Register, and Mountain View Register.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing
Steeply pitched cross-gable roof
Fenestration pattern and leaded glass and wood casement windows Stucco cladding
Decorative half timbering
Bay windows
Entrance recessed beneath overhanging half-timbered second story Bridge with brick walls over Permenante Creek off of Miramonte Avenue Continuation of B12. References:
"Building News," The Peninsula Times Tribune, March 12, 1927.
City of Mountain View, "1855 Miramonte Avenue input form," Mountain View Historic Register, March 15, 2002.
Google Earth (2008, 2009, 2011, 2014).
University of California, Santa Barbara Library FrameFinder, historic aerials (1948, 1965). Accessed online November 2024, https:/ /mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 243 MOFFETT BL City: Mountain View Zip: 94043-4723 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15844005 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Postwar Industrial Plan Shape: Rectangle Construction Type: Reinforced Concrete Number of Stories: 1 Roof Style: Monitor, Parapet Roof Material: Asphalt - Rolled Exterior Material: Concrete - Concrete Masonry Unit (CMU), Stucco Primary Door Material: Metal Window Style: Clerestory, Fixed, Pivot, Skylight Window Material: Steel Porch: None Garage: None
Other Architectural/Site Features: Roof has a central monitor with a low-pitch gable, behind a shaped parapet. Addition at the rear of the parcel, with gable sheet metal roof, walls clad in wood siding, metal siding, and concrete masonry units. Garage entrances to the building at the primary (north), west side and south facades
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP8. Industrial building
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1946; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
STANAWAY DAWN ET AL, 1200 MILLBRAE AVE,
MILLBRAE CA 94030
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 243 MOFFETT BL
B1. Historic Name: Arrow Development Building
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Industrial B4. Present Use: Auto-Related Commercial/Light Industrial *B5. Architectural Style: Postwar Industrial
*B6. Construction History: The building was originally constructed in 1946. By 1955, a gable-roof addition was built at the rear of the parcel.
By 2007, an original window at the north of the central garage door, and a pedestrian door south of the central garage door, both at the westernmost wall of the building were replaced.
*B7. Moved?
✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Agricultural & Industrial Development (1945-1959) Area: Mountain View
Period of Significance: 1946-1960 Property Type: Industrial Applicable NR/CR Criteria: A/1 (Events) Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion b (Events) Statement of Significance:
The property is a one-story light industrial building located north of downtown Mountain View on the east side of Mo ffett Boulevard and is associated with the theme of Agricultural & Industrial Development (1945-1959) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement.
Originally built in 1948, the property was the founding location of the Arrow Development Company. Established by four engineers from the Hendy Ironworks Plant in Sunnyvale, the Arrow Development Company developed machinery, truck bodies and trailers, and recreational equipment. Their work captured the attention of Walt Disney in 1953, and he contracted Arrow Development Company to design, build, and test about half of Disneyland's rides by 1960. In 1959, the company revolutionized the steel tube roller coaster, used for the Matterhorn ride, and set the standard for modern roller coasters. Walt Disney Productions purchased a one-third stake in the company in 1960, and relocated Arrow Development Company to 1555 Plymouth Street in Mountain View.
The building appears eligible for the National Register, California Register, and Mountain View Register under Criteria A/1/b for its major and influential contributions to the development of roller coaster and amusement park technology, as well as the transition of Mountain View's economy after World War II. The period of significance is 1946, the year of construction, through 1960, when Arrow Development Company relocated. Despite the replacement of several windows, doors, and skylights, overall the building retains high integrity. The building retains its overall industrial design, workmanship, and most exterior materials, as well as integrity of setting, location, feeling, and association. The gable-roof addition at the rear of the property was constructed by 1955, within the period of signifi cance of the property, and so is a contributing feature of the building's historic significance.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
None
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B12. References:
Carey & Co. Inc, "Citywide Historic Properties Survey Mountain View, California." Vols. I and II. Prepared for City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008.
Google Street View (2007).
University of California, Santa Barbara Library FrameFinder, historic aerials (1956). Accessed online July 2024, https:/ /mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 252 MONROE DR City: Mountain View Zip: 94040-1016 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 14807026 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Vernacular Plan Shape: Rectangle
Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 2
Roof Style: Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Wood - Clapboard/Lap/Bevel Primary Door Material: Not Visible Window Style: Hung Window Material: Wood
Porch: Enclosed Garage: Detached Garage
Other Architectural/Site Features: Property includes multiple single-family houses and a detached garage with a tank house. Swimming pool behind one house not visible from street.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP4. Ancillary Building (Tank House) *P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
April 26, 2024
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
ca.1931; Aerial photograph, Fairchild Aerial Surveys
*P7. Owner and Address:
MARTINEZ JOHN WILLIAM AND JULIE ELLEN
TRUST, 252 MONROE DR, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA
94040
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 252 MONROE DR
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Tank House
B3. Original Use: Agricultural B4. Present Use: Agricultural *B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular
*B6. Construction History:
The property consists of five or more buildings constructed from the early 1930s to the 1960s. From analysis of aerial photographs, the subject parcel was originally located within a rural area of western Mountain View that was planted with orchards, and eventually developed with housing tracts by the 1950s. An aerial photograph from 1931 shows the footprint of the tank house building, which is still extant. As such, the tank house likely dates to an earlier period of ownership and construction. By the 1940s, several other buildings had been constructed on the property surrounding the tank house.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Swimming Pool, Prominent or Unusual Tree, Tank House, Barn B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Agricultural & Industrial Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View
Period of Significance: ca.1931 Property Type: Agricultural Applicable NR/CR Criteria: None Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
252 Monroe Drive is a multi-family residential property located in the Greater San Antonio neighborhood that is associated with the theme of Agricultural & Industrial Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. In 1933, the owners of the property were Charles Washington Schenk and Ellen Schenk. Charles Schenk was a superintendent of the L.P. Degan Belting Company of San Francisco. Schenk occupied the subject property through the late 1960s. Prior to ownership by the Schenk family, a large tank house was built on the lot, likely for agricultural use associated with the surrounding orchards. Tank houses are an important building typology associated with California's early patterns of development. They stored water for both urban and rural properties prior to the advent of electricity and access to water mains and typically utilized an attached windmill to pump and store water through a self-sufficient system.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
HP3. Multiple family property
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
None
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
From visual analysis, the tank house appears to have been converted into a residential unit with windows and doors installed at an unknown date. The largest building facing Monroe Drive also appears altered with a Mediterranean Revival facade.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The subject property includes a rare, extant example of a pre-1930s tank house in the Greater San Antonio area of Mountain View.
Therefore, the tank house on the property appears eligible for local listing under Mountain View Register Criterion (c). The other buildings on the property are not historically significant. As the original context of the owner and builder of the tank house is not known, and due to alterations, the subject property does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register under any criteria. The tank house retains overall integrity for local designation, despite alterations to the exterior, following conversion to residential use. The tank house has a period of significance of ca.1931, the earliest documentation of the tank house.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Square, box-like form and two-story height
Gable roof
Clapboard siding
Attached vernacular structure
Continuation of B12. References:
“Charles Schenk.” Palo Alto Times, April 8, 1969.
University of California, Santa Barbara Library FrameFinder, historic aerials (1931, 1941). Accessed online June 2024, https:/ /mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 372 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-1114 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15408023 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Craftsman Plan Shape: Rectangle
Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1
Roof Style: Hip Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Wood - Shingle Primary Door Material: Wood Window Style: Casement Window Material: Wood
Porch: Partial Width Garage: None
Other Architectural/Site Features: Partial-width porch with Tuscan columns and shingled railing; wood windows with ogee lugs and diamond muntin upper sash; wood front door with ornately carved detail; and brick chimney. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1905; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
YU ROBERT AND CHU TRACY TRUSTEE, 372
MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA
94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 372 MOUNTAIN VIEW AV
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman
*B6. Construction History:
372 Mountain View Avenue was built in 1905. It first appears on the 1908 Sanborn map as a one-story, wood- frame residence with a rectangular plan and full-width porch. By 1921, the building was enlarged with several additions creating a U-shaped footprint. Additions included an extension to the south side of the primary facade and the west side of the rear facade. A porch was also added to the rear facade.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1851-1909) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1905 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: None Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
372 Mountain View Avenue is a Craftsman bungalow in the Shoreline West neighborhood associated with the theme of Residential Development (1851-1909) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. 372 Mountain View Avenue was built as part of the larger pattern of residential development in surrounding blocks spurred by the need to house employees of the Pacifi c Press Association, whose printing facility was located less than a half mile to the northeast of the property.
The neighborhood now referred to as "Shoreline West" grew as a residential area at what was then the west edge of Mountain View following the ca. 1904 establishment of the Seventh Day Adventist publisher, the Pacifi c Press publishing company. The publishing company's plant was located on Villa Street west of what is now South Shoreline Boulevard, having moved to Mountain View from its previous location in Oakland. where it was established in 1874. Seventh-Day Adventist families who moved to the area with the business built their homes in the blocks along Mariposa Street, Pettis Avenue, Palo Alto Avenue, and Mountain View Avenue. According to historian Nick Perry, about 100 Seventh-Day Adventist families moved to Mountain View along with the Pacifi c Press Association, establishing an industrial enterprise in a town that previously had a population of around 600 and whose economy was based on agriculture. In subsequent decades, members of the Seventh Day Adventist community established to the southwest of the Pacifi c Press Association built local institutions such as the Mountain View Academy high school, established in 1922, and became active in local politics. By the start of World War II, the neighborhood consisted of dense residential blocks interspersed with patches of orchards remaining from its previous agricultural use. The publishing plant remained in operation in Mountain View until 1984.
The original owner/occupants were not identified through the course of research, however, at least one renter in 1920 was listed as a clerk for the Pacific Press. By 1930, the residence was occupied by a plumber and his family.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
The property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register and has an active Mills Act contract.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
Sometime after 1956, the detached rear garage was rotated to face the rear alleyway.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
372 Mountain View Avenue is currently listed in the Mountain View Register as a good local example of a Craftsman bungalow in the Shoreline West neighborhood and retains eligibility under Mountain View Criterion c (Architecture). Due to several additions and extensions to the primary and rear facades, the property does not appear to retain sufficient historic integrity or rise to a level of individual significance for listing in the National Register or California Register. As currently written, the Mountain View Historic Preservation Ordinance does not provide a definition of historic integrity or threshold for integrity assessment, and a somewhat lower threshold of historic integrity compared to National Register and California Register-eligible properties may be utilized in assessing properties of local significance for the Mountain View Register. As such, the property retains sufficient historic integrity to convey its local significance for Mountain View Register eligibility.
The period of significance is 1905, the year of construction.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing
Hipped roof with overhanging eaves and exposed rafter tails Partial-width porch with Tuscan columns and shingled porch railing Wood shingle siding
Fenestration pattern and original wood-sash double-hung windows with diamond muntin upper sash Original, partially-glazed wood door with a circular window and carved Craftsman detailing Exterior brick chimney at front porch.
Continuation of B12. References:
Carey & Co. Inc, "Citywide Historic Properties Survey Mountain View, California." Vols. I and II. Prepared for City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008.
Ignoffo, Mary Jo. "Milestones: A History of Mountain View, California." Cupertino, CA: California History Center, 2002.
Perry, Nicholas. "Mountain View." Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing, 2006.
Sanborn Map Company, fire insurance maps (1943, 1956). Accessed via San Francisco Public Library.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 360 OAK ST City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-1232 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15812007 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Craftsman Plan Shape: Rectangle
Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1
Roof Style: Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Stucco Primary Door Material: Wood
Window Style: Fixed, Hung Window Material: Wood
Porch: Partial Width Garage: Basement Garage
Other Architectural/Site Features: Curved porch columns create oblong openings; exposed rafter tails; exterior brick chimney; and metal awning at primary facade.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1923; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
KESELER INGRID M, 360 OAK ST, MOUNTAIN
VIEW CA 94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 360 OAK ST
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Craftsman
*B6. Construction History: The building was originally constructed in 1923. An original detached garage was demolished before 2007, and in 2022 the front door was replaced. Metal awning was likely not original. Brick at chimney may have been replaced. *B7. Moved?
✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1923 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: None Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
The property is a one-story, single-family Craftsman style residence located in Old Mountain View associated with the theme of Residential Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement.
The residence was originally constructed for Alvin Mason in 1923. The property was previously originally owned by William Mason, Alvin Mason's father, who raised Alvin and his siblings at the adjacent property to the north at 336 California Street (demolished). Alvin Mason was a miller and cabinetmaker for the Minton Lumber Company from approximately 1920 through 1940, and retired by 1950. Conceivably, Alvin Mason could have used his trade skills to build the subject residence himself; however, this could not be confirmed through available archival sources. Alvin Mason and his wife Ruth Mason lived at the subject property through the 1990s.
The subject property does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register under any criteria.
While the property does not rise to the level of signifi cance for individual designation in the National Register or California Register, it is currently listed in the Mountain View Register. It is a good local example of a Craftsman style residence from the 1920s in Old Mountain View, distinguished by its oblong porch openings, and continues to be eligible for local listing under Mountain View Register Criterion c. The period of significance is the year the building was constructed, 1923. The property retains all aspects of historic integrity and overall retains integrity for listing in the Mountain View Register
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing
Gable roof with overhanging eaves and exposed rafter tails Stucco cladding
Curved porch columns creating oblong openings
Original fenestration pattern and wood windows
Exterior brick chimney
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
The property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register. Property has an active Mills Act contract.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B12. References:
City of Mountain View, "360 Oak Street input form," Mountain View Historic Register, March 13, 2002.
Google Street View (2007, 2008, 2021, 2022).
"Minton's Honored," The Peninsula Times Tribune, October 31, 1974.
Sanborn Map Company, fire insurance maps (1908, 1921, 1943, 1956). Accessed via San Francisco Public Library.
United States Federal Census (1930, 1940, 1950). Accessed online June 2024, Ancestry.com.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 340 PALO ALTO AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-1118 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15408041 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Folk Victorian/National Folk Plan Shape: Rectangle Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1.5
Roof Style: Dutch Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle Exterior Material: Wood - Clapboard/Lap/Bevel Primary Door Material: Wood - Panel Window Style: Double-Hung Window Material: Wood
Porch: Partial Width, Wraparound Garage: Detached Garage Other Architectural/Site Features: Dutch gable roof with front-facing gable and two gabled dormers on each of the side facades. A wood frame porch wraps around with Tuscan columns and turned wood balusters. There are two brick chimneys. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
June 29, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1908; Mountain View Assessment Rolls
*P7. Owner and Address:
BYER DOUGLAS R TRUSTEE, 891 ALLARDICE
WAY, STANFORD CA 94305
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
May 4, 2023
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 340 PALO ALTO AV
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Folk Victorian/National Folk
*B6. Construction History:
The subject property was built in 1908. The building first appears on the 1908 Sanborn map, which shows the building footprint as a one-story single-family residence with a compound footprint including a partial-width wraparound porch and several bay windows. The gabled dormers are visible in early 1920s photographs. By 1921, two small ancillary buildings were added to the rear of the parcel, including a rectilinear one-story residential unit in the northeast corner and a rectilinear one-to-one-and-one-half-story storeroom. In 1934, the storeroom was destroyed by a fire, but was eventually rebuilt.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Garage
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1851-1909) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1908 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: C/3 (Design) Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: Not Evaluated for Mountain View Register Statement of Significance:
The property is a single-family Folk Victorian residence with Queen Anne and Colonial Revival in fluences located in the Shoreline West neighborhood, associated with the theme of Residential Development (1851-1909) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. The residence was part of the larger pattern of residential development in surrounding blocks spurred by the need to house employees of the Pacifi c Press Association, whose printing facility was located nearby at 1340 Villa Street. The neighborhood now referred to as "Shoreline West" grew as a residential area at what was then the west edge of Mountain View following the 1904 relocation of the Seventh-day Adventist publisher, the Pacifi c Press publishing company from Oakland, where it was established in 1874. Some 100 Seventh-day Adventist families moved to the area with the business, building their homes in the blocks along Mariposa Street, Pettis Avenue, Palo Alto Avenue, and Mountain View Avenue. The Pacific Press Association established an industrial enterprise in a town which previously had a population of around 600 and whose economy was based in agriculture. In subsequent decades, members of the Seventh-day Adventist community also built local institutions such as the Mountain View Academy high school, established in 1922, and became active in local politics. By the start of World War II, the neighborhood consisted of dense residential blocks interspersed with patches of orchards remaining from its previous agricultural use. The publishing plant remained in operation in Mountain View until 1984, when operations relocated to Idaho and the site was redeveloped.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
Property was previously listed on the Mountain View Register, but was later voluntarily removed from the Register by the property owner.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: May 4, 2023
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: May 4, 2023 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
Around 2003, the rear storeroom was demolished, and around 2005, the property underwent a renovation that included a one-story addition to the rear facade and construction of a concrete accessibility ramp. It appears that the original wrought iron fence was removed at this time.
Between 2019 and 2021, the subject parcel was subdivided at the southern side. At an unknown date, the detached residential unit was converted to a garage, and the property was reverted back to a single-family residence.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The original owners and occupants of 340 Palo Alto Avenue were James and Susie Stover, who occupied the house through the 1930s or later. In the 1930 census, James Stover was listed without an occupation, and Susie Stover was listed as a salesperson for a dry goods company. Around the 1920s, it appears that the property was converted to multi-family residential use and hosted several renters, possibly within the main residential building or the rear ancillary buildings. George Hood was listed as the builder for the renovation. The property is now a single-family residence.
340 Palo Alto Avenue is significant as an excellent example of Folk Victorian style architecture in Mountain View, associated with early patterns of residential development in the Shoreline West neighborhood. 340 Palo Alto Avenue is eligible for listing in the National Register and California Register at the local level under Criterion C/3 (Architecture) with a period of significance of 1908, the year of construction.
The original owners and occupants of the property do not appear to have made significant contributions to local, state, or national history, and no other notable individuals appear to be associated with the property. Several minor alterations have included a rear addition that is not visible from the public right-of-way and a compatibly designed accessible entrance ramp to the porch. The property retains its character- defining features and historic integrity for National Register and California Register eligibility. This evaluation does not address Mountain View Register eligibility.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
One-and-one-half story height
Dutch gable roof with gabled dormers
Asymmetrical massing and fenestration pattern
Wraparound wood-frame front porch with Tuscan columns, cornice, and turned balusters Wood clapboard horizontal siding
Angled bay windows
Double-hung wood sash windows
Brick chimneys.
Continuation of B12. References:
Carey & Co. Inc, "Citywide Historic Properties Survey Mountain View, California." Vols. I and II. Prepared for City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008.
City of Mountain View Planning Department, "Now and Then: Exploring Mountain View's Architectural Heritage." City of Mountain View, April 1979.
Hall, Clifford. Stover Home. 1922. Photograph. California Revealed from Mountain View Public Library. http:/ /archive.org/details/cmv_000404.
Hall, Clifford. Stover Home, Family in Front. ca 1922. Photograph. California Revealed from Mountain View Public Library. https:/ /californiarevealed.org/do/0a0d90c3-51ac-4a44-9d99-077102e4d22e#page/1.
Ignoffo, Mary Jo. "Milestones: A History of Mountain View, California." Cupertino, CA: California History Center, 2002. “Permits Issued for 17 Buildings.” Daily Palo Alto Times, February 1, 1922, 6. Newspapers.com.
Perry, Nicholas. "Mountain View." Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing, 2006.
United States Federal Census (1910, 1920, 1930, 1940, 1950). Accessed online October 2024, Ancestry.com.
University of California, Santa Barbara Library FrameFinder, historic aerials (DATE). Accessed online October 2024, https:/ /mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 390 PALO ALTO AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-1118 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15408039 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Tudor Revival/English Cottage Plan Shape: Irregular Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1.5
Roof Style: Jerkinhead Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle Exterior Material: Stucco Primary Door Material: Partially Glazed Window Style: Casement, Fixed, Double-Hung Window Material: Vinyl, Wood Porch: None Garage: Detached Garage
Other Architectural/Site Features: Jerkinhead roof with rounded corners and lunette window at the upper gable end. Large picture window on the primary facade with decoratively shaped opening and applied ornament above. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
June 25, 2024
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1928; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
CHEN SHARON F AND POSKEY JERAL, 390 PALO
ALTO AVE, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 390 PALO ALTO AV
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Tudor Revival/English Cottage *B6. Construction History: 390 Palo Alto Avenue was constructed in 1928 by Fred L. Cozard. Based on comparisons with Sanborn maps, a rectangular rear addition was added sometime after 1943.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved?
✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Fred L. Cozard
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1928 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: None Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
The property is a single-family residence located in the Shoreline West neighborhood designed in the English Cottage style that is associated with the theme of Residential Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. The builder of the subject property was Fred L. Cozard, who owned and occupied the property with his wife Florence.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
The property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register. Property has an active Mills Act contract.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
Other alterations include the installation of solar panels to the roof of the detached garage, and possibly the replacement of hung windows at the front of the building. The garage appears to be a later addition, or altered.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The subject property does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register under any criteria.
While the property does not rise to the level of significance for individual designation in the National Register or California Register, it is listed on the local Mountain View Register. The property remains eligible for listing in the Mountain View Register under Criterion c as a rare example of the English Cottage style by a local builder, with a period of significance of 1928, the year of construction.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing
Jerkinhead roof with rounded edges
Arched, recessed entryway
Brick chimney with rounded edges
Stucco siding
Fenestration pattern
Tri-partite picture window with shaped surround on the primary facade Cast plaster facade ornamentation
Lunnette window at the gable end.
Continuation of B12. References:
“Instruments on File: Santa Clara County.” Daily Palo Alto Times, May 15, 1928.
Sanborn Map Company, fire insurance maps (1921, 1943, 1956). Accessed via San Francisco Public Library.
United States Federal Census (1930). Accessed online June 2024, Ancestry.com.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 562 PETTIS AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-1832 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15424030 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Vernacular Bungalow Plan Shape: Rectangle Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1
Roof Style: Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Wood - Clapboard/Lap/Bevel Primary Door Material: Wood Window Style: Fixed, Double-Hung Window Material: Vinyl Porch: Partial Width Garage: Detached Garage
Other Architectural/Site Features: Turned wood balustrade at central, partial-width porch; wood lattice vent in gable end. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1925; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
GAUTHRON CHRISTOPHE AND PURNIMA, 562
PETTIS AVE, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 562 PETTIS AV
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular Bungalow
*B6. Construction History:
562 Pettis was built in 1925. The property first appears on the 1943 Sanborn map, which shows the residence with a square footprint, central front porch, and rear porch aligned to the left (south) corner of the building.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1925 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: None Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
562 Pettis Avenue is a Craftsman-style bungalow located in the Shoreline West neighborhood, associated with the theme of Residential Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. 562 Pettis Avenue was built as part of the larger pattern of residential development in surrounding blocks spurred by the need to house employees of the Pacific Press Association, whose printing facility was located less than a half mile to the northeast of the property. The neighborhood now referred to as "Shoreline West" grew as a residential area at what was then the west edge of Mountain View following the ca. 1904 establishment of the Seventh-day Adventist publisher, the Pacifi c Press publishing company. The publishing company's plant was located on Villa Street west of what is now South Shoreline Boulevard, having moved to Mountain View from its previous location in Oakland where it was established in 1874.
Seventh-day Adventist families who moved to the area with the business built their homes in the blocks along Mariposa Street, Pettis Avenue, Palo Alto Avenue, and Mountain View Avenue. According to historian Nick Perry, about 100 Seventh-Day Adventist families moved to Mountain View along with the Pacific Press Association, establishing an industrial enterprise in a town that previously had a population of around 600 and whose economy was based on agriculture. In subsequent decades, members of the Seventh-day Adventist community established to the southwest of the Pacifi c Press Association built local institutions such as the Mountain View Academy high school, established in 1922, and became active in local politics. By the start of World War II, the neighborhood consisted of dense residential blocks interspersed with patches of orchards remaining from its previous agricultural use. The publishing plant remained in operation in Mountain View until 1984.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
The property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register. Property has an active Mills Act contract.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
Aerial photographs show that a two-story addition was added to the rear facade around the 1990s. Several alterations were made at an unknown date, including: the replacement of the original front door, the replacement of original double-hung and fixed wood sash windows with simulated divided lite vinyl sashes, the installation of a garden kitchen window, and the replacement of the original porch flooring with tile pavers. A detached garage is set back at the northern side of the property and appears to be a later addition or altered.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The subject property does not appear to be individually eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register under any criteria. It is not associated with persons, events, or broad patterns important to local, California, or national history, nor is it likely to yield information important to history or prehistory. The property has not been identified as the work of a notable architect or builder and does not possess high artistic merit. While the property does not rise to the level of significance for individual designation in the National Register or California Register, it is currently listed in the Mountain View Register. 562 Pettis Avenue retains eligibility for the Mountain View Register under Criterion c (Design) as a good local example of a small vernacular bungalow with Craftsman influences, built during a period of increased housing development for local employees of the Pacific Press Association. Due to exterior alterations including the replacement of wood sash double-hung windows with incompatible vinyl multi-lite windows, along with the installation of a garden window and an incompatible front door, the property does not retain sufficient historic integrity for listing in the National Register or California Register. As currently written, the Mountain View Historic Preservation Ordinance does not provide a definition of historic integrity or threshold for integrity assessment, and a somewhat lower threshold of historic integrity compared to National Register and California Register-eligible properties may be utilized in assessing properties of local significance for the Mountain View Register. The two-story rear addition is setback such that the overall form and massing of the original bungalow remains legible, and enough original materials and features are intact to convey the bungalow design. As such, the property retains sufficient historic integrity to convey its local significance for Mountain View Register eligibility. The period of significance is 1925, the year of construction.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing
Low-pitched gable roof with overhanging eaves and exposed beam ends Wood lattice vent in the gable end
Partial-width central porch with simple square columns and turned-spindle balustrade Horizontal wood clapboard siding
Flat wood window surrounds.
Continuation of B12. References:
Ignoffo, Mary Jo. "Milestones: A History of Mountain View, California." Cupertino, CA: California History Center, 2002.
NETR Online, aerial photographs, 1948-2020. Accessed online October 2024, https:/ /www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
Perry, Nicholas. "Mountain View." Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing, 2006.
Sanborn Map Company, fire insurance maps (1921, 1943, 1956). Accessed via San Francisco Public Library.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 604 PETTIS AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-1834 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15431048 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Folk Victorian/National Folk Plan Shape: Rectangle Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1
Roof Style: Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Wood - Drop/Groove Primary Door Material: Wood Window Style: Double-Hung Window Material: Wood
Porch: Engaged, Full Width Garage: Detached Garage
Other Architectural/Site Features: Paired, square columns support engaged, full-width front porch with removable sunshades; wood knee brace brackets at the gable ends.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
ca.1888-1900; "Now and Then: Exploring Mountain
View’s Architectural Heritage," 1979
*P7. Owner and Address:
KOELLER GILBERT C AND JANET M, 604 PETTIS
AVE, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 604 PETTIS AV
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Folk Victorian/National Folk
*B6. Construction History: The exact date of construction of 604 Pettis is unknown; however, the parcel was recorded ca.1888 as part of the Snow and Pettis Addition and based on the architectural style, the date of construction can be estimated to this period of the late 19th century. The property appears on the 1921 Sanborn insurance map with a rectangular plan footprint with full-width porch and two rear ancillary buildings, including a barn in the northwestern corner of the parcel.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved?
✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1851-1909) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: ca.1888-1900 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: C/3 (Design) Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: Not Evaluated for Mountain View Register Statement of Significance:
604 Pettis Avenue is a National Folk style single-family residence located in the Shoreline West neighborhood, associated with the theme of Residential Development (1851-1909) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. The property was built ca.1888 during a period of early residential development and agricultural expansion in Mountain View. The earliest known occupants ca.1914 were Mr. A. Gould, a laborer, and his wife Leonora. The house remained within the extended Gould family for sixty years.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
Property was previously listed on the Mountain View Register, but was later voluntarily removed from the Register by the property owner.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
In 1990, a new concrete foundation was poured. The two rear auxiliary buildings were eventually replaced by a garage sometime after 1956.
No further exterior alterations were noted from visual inspection.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
604 Pettis Avenue appears eligible for the National Register and California Register under Criterion C/3 and as an early surviving National Folk style single-family residence built during a period of early residential expansion. The residence includes distinctive features of the style, including the simple form, lack of added ornamentation, and engaged (recessed) porch. The symmetrical facade arrangement and prominent porch columns subtly evoke Colonial Revival influences in this vernacular National Folk building. No major exterior alterations were identified; therefore the property retains sufficient overall historic integrity for listing in the National Register and California Register. The period of significance is ca.1888-1900, the estimated period of construction. This evaluation does not address Mountain View Register eligibility.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing
Engaged, full-width front porch
Paired, square porch columns
Side-gable roof with knee brace brackets
Wide tongue and groove horizontal wood siding
Fenestration pattern, including one-over-one double-hung wood sash windows with ogee lugs and flat wood surrounds.
Continuation of B12. References:
Carey & Co. Inc, "Citywide Historic Properties Survey Mountain View, California." Vols. I and II. Prepared for City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008.
City of Mountain View Planning Department, "Now and Then: Exploring Mountain View's Architectural Heritage." City of Mountain View, April 1979.
Ignoffo, Mary Jo. "Milestones: A History of Mountain View, California." Cupertino, CA: California History Center, 2002.
Perry, Nicholas. "Mountain View." Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing, 2006.
Sanborn Map Company, fire insurance maps (1921, 1943, 1956). Accessed via San Francisco Public Library.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 195 N RENGSTORFF AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94043-4221 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15001002 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Midcentury Modern Plan Shape: Square Construction Type: Reinforced Concrete Number of Stories: 1 Roof Style: Hyperbolic Paraboloid Roof Material: Thin Shell Concrete Exterior Material: Concrete Primary Door Material: Not Visible Window Style: Stained/Leaded Glass Window Material: Metal Porch: None Garage: Surface Parking Lot
Other Architectural/Site Features: Hyperobolic paraboloid roof creates peaks at each of the four facades and extends down nearly to the ground at each corner. Window systems beneath each gable end have geometric stained glass between horizontal metal mullions. A detached rear ministry building was not highly visible from the public right-of-way but contains a two-story, gabled building. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP16. Religious building
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
February 9, 2024
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
ca.1964-1966; Palo Alto Times
*P7. Owner and Address:
CEN CALIF CONF ASSN SEVENTH DAY
ADVENTISTS, POST OFFICE BOX 770, CLOVIS CA
93613
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 195 N RENGSTORFF AV
B1. Historic Name: Mountain View Japanese Seventh-day Adventist Church B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Religious B4. Present Use: Religious
*B5. Architectural Style: Midcentury Modern
*B6. Construction History:
Construction on the property began in 1964 with work done by members of the church congregation under the leadership of contractor Fred Bray and church Elder Shirou Kunihira. An image from an archival newspaper shows the formation of the concrete roof poured onto wood planks and rebar framing. Construction of the chapel was likely completed in the next one or two years; however, this was not confirmed by research or permit documentation. A detached ministry building located behind the church appears to have been constructed concurrently with, or shortly after the construction of the main church building according to historic aerial photographs.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Ministry Building
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Fred Bray (with church congregants) *B10. Significance: Theme: Civic Growth and Social, Religious & Cultural Development (1945-1979) Area: Mountain View
Period of Significance: ca.1964-1970 Property Type: Religious Applicable NR/CR Criteria: A/1 (Events), C/3 (Design)
Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion b (Events), MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
The property has a chapel and ministry building designed in the Midcentury Modern style located immediately east of the Monta Loma neighborhood and associated with the theme of Civic Growth and Social, Religious, and Cultural Development (1945-1979) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement.
The subject property was built 1964-ca.1966 and appears to be the first Seventh-day Adventist church constructed by and for the Japanese community in Mountain View; however, the congregation's founding dates back to the 1920s according to their Facebook page. It has been continuously used by the Japanese community as a Seventh-day Adventist church since its construction.
The Seventh-day Adventists have had a long-standing presence in Mountain View, extending back to 1904 when the Pacific Press publishing facility moved to town from Oakland. The Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) Church, an Adventist Protestant Christian denomination, has a long history of missionary work, is currently practiced worldwide, and has congregations in Mountain View that re flect the diverse cultural backgrounds in the city. The Japanese community also has a long history in Mountain View; however, after most Japanese residents were interned in concentration camps by the United States government during World War II, the community had to fight to reestablish its roots and heal from a collective trauma.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
HP4. Ancillary building, HP36. Ethnic Minority Property (Japanese/Japanese American)
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
None
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
No major exterior alterations to the chapel are visible or identified through research.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
During the postwar period, previously established social, fraternal, and religious organizations continued to play a role in the community.
Some long-time religious congregations in Mountain View remodeled or expanded into new facilities, while other new congregations were established. Often these religious congregations embraced Midcentury Modernism to signal their continued relevance in contemporary society. In the case of 195 N Rengstorff Avenue, the chapel has a dramatic, sweeping hyperbolic paraboloid roof which is an innovative construction method developed by 20th-century Modern architecture that allows for uninterrupted large interior spans. The hyperbolic paraboloid construction method is not known to have been used in any other extant buildings in Mountain View.
The chapel and ministry building at 195 N Rengstorff Avenue appear eligible for the National Register, California Register, and Mountain View Register at the local level of significance under Criterion A/1/b (Events) for association with the Japanese community in Mountain View; specifically as the first SDA church purpose-built by and for the Japanese community during the post-World War II period when the local Japanese community was reestablishing roots in Mountain View following wartime internment. Additionally, the chapel is individually eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, and Mountain View Register under Criterion C/3/c as an excellent local example of Midcentury Modernism that is particularly distinctive for its hyperbolic paraboloid roof. The period of significance is 1964-1970, spanning the year of construction through the period of reestablishment of the Japanese community in Mountain View following WWII. The property appears to have few if any, exterior alterations and retains sufficient integrity for listing in all three registers.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing
Concrete hyperbolic paraboloid roof
Window systems at each gable end with tripartite stained glass panels Concrete pebble dash exterior cladding and engaged concrete columns Original two-lite aluminum slider windows grouped along the lower level Two-story gabled ministry building at rear of site.
Continuation of B12. References:
Flora Chou, Stephanie Cisneros, Deepeaka Dhaliwal, Stephanie Hodal, and Donna Graves. 2023. “Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in California, 1850-1995.” National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form. National Parks Service.
Jeannette Bradley. “Japanese Church: Adventist Building Unusual Sanctuary.” Palo Alto Times, May 2, 1964, 4.
NETR Online, aerial photographs, 1948-2020. Accessed online October 2024, https:/ /www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
Mountain View Japanese Seventh-day Adventist Church. "Introduction." Facebook Page, 2024. https:/ /www.facebook.com/MVJSDA/ DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 987 N RENGSTORFF AV City: Mountain View Zip: 94043-1713 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15302041 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Vernacular Plan Shape: Irregular
Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 2
Roof Style: Flat, Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle, Built Up Roof/Tar and Gravel Exterior Material: Wood - Drop/Groove Primary Door Material: Wood Window Style: Double-Hung Window Material: Wood
Porch: None Garage: Carport
Other Architectural/Site Features:
Complex composed of several connected buildings with a mix of flat and low gable roofs. Building is primarily one story with a rear two-story portion that has a painted sign reading "Ambra Olive Oil." A round water tank is located on the roof.
Italian cypress trees line the property along Rengstorff Avenue. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP8. Industrial building
*P4. Resources Present: ✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
ca.1926-1930; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
AMBRA MARIO L, 987 N RENGSTORFF AVE,
MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94043
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 987 N RENGSTORFF AV
B1. Historic Name: Ambra Olive Oil Company Building
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Industrial B4. Present Use: Commercial *B5. Architectural Style: Vernacular
*B6. Construction History:
The property at 987 N Rengstorff is a complex of connected buildings constructed from ca. 1926- 1930.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Water tank, Italian cypress trees B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Agricultural & Industrial Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View
Period of Significance: ca.1926-1953 Property Type: Industrial Applicable NR/CR Criteria: A/1 (Events), B/2 (Persons)
Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion a (Persons), MVRHR Criterion b (Events) Statement of Significance:
987 N. Rengstorff Avenue is a former residence and olive oil processing facility located in northwest Mountain View, associated with the theme of Agricultural & Industrial Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. Around 1926, Mario Ambra (1887–1968) founded the Ambra Olive Oil Company in Mountain View and began operating the business from his residence at 987 N. Rengstorff Avenue, which later expanded over time as a processing facility. A native of Pachino, Italy, Ambra immigrated to the United States in 1906 and settled in Mountain View with his wife, Rosaria (1890–1981), by the 1920s. Ambra was a carpenter and likely the builder of the complex (however this could not be con firmed during the course of research). Ambra had one of the largest olive orchards in Mountain View and brought his olives to the facility at 987 N. Regstorff Avenue for processing into olive oil. Following Ambra's retirement in 1953, his son Concetto took over operations, and his grandson, also named Mario Ambra, went on to be mayor of Mountain View. The factory has been continuously family-owned and operated since ca.1926, however, it no longer produces olive oil and instead manufactures other food items.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
HP4. Ancillary building
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
Property was previously listed on the Mountain View Register, but was later voluntarily removed from the Register by the property owner.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
A fire took place at the factory in 1997, however, the extent of the damage and any subsequent alterations are not known. Several windows on the rear east facade appear to have been replaced with metal or vinyl sash at an unknown date. Many original features including wood sash windows with ogee lugs, shiplap siding, and water tower are extant and the main building complex appears much as it did in a 1995 photograph, prior to the fire. Ancillary buildings on the site, now addressed 925 and 927 N Rengstorff Avenue appear in a 1948 aerial. A smaller metal storage building west of the main building complex was built at an unknown date prior to 1995.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The former Ambra Olive Oil Factory at 987 N Rengstorff Avenue appears eligible for listing in the National Register, California Register, and Mountain View Register under Criteria A/1/b (Events) as a rare surviving agricultural property associated with the primary period of growth in the canning and packing industries in Mountain View; and under Criterion B/2/a (Persons) for its association with the Ambra family, who were prominent members of the community and significant for their contributions to the agricultural industry in Mountain View. The building complex has a vernacular style which is typical for an industrial building of the era, but is not distinctive of a particular architectural style or construction method for eligibility under Criterion C/3/c (Architecture). While some alterations were likely made following damage from a fire in 1997, the property continues to convey its original use as an agricultural facility and retains its overall form and most original elements including wood sash windows, shiplap siding, and the tank house. Therefore, the property retains sufficient historic integrity necessary for all three registers. The period of significance is ca.1926 to 1953, beginning with the approximate year of the factory's opening through Mario Ambra's retirement.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Complex form and multi-story massing
Flat and gabled roofs with overhanging eaves with exposed rafter tails Shiplap horizontal wood siding
One-over-one original wood sash windows with ogee lugs
Round water tank
Painted "Ambra Olive Oil" sign
Ancillary buildings built during period of significance (addressed 925 and 927 N. Rengstorff Ave.) Continuation of B12. References:
Ambra Olive Oil Co. 1995. Photograph. California Revealed from Mountain View Public Library. https:/ /californiarevealed.org/do/f28adc3f-b3a1-4031-a51e-bb60dfe2c232#page/1 Carey & Co. Inc, "Citywide Historic Properties Survey Mountain View, California." Vols. I and II. Prepared for City of Mountain View, September 1, 2008.
NETR Online, aerial photographs, 1948-2020. Accessed online September 2024, https:/ /www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 575 N SHORELINE BL City: Mountain View Zip: 94043-3102 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15324022 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Midcentury Modern, Neo-Japanese Plan Shape: Rectangle Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1
Roof Style: Gable Roof Material: Clay Tile
Exterior Material: Stucco, Wood - Vertical Board Primary Door Material: Wood Window Style: Clerestory, Fixed, Ribbon, Stained/Leaded Glass Window Material: Metal Porch: "Engawa" style porch Garage: Surface Parking Lot Other Architectural/Site Features: Multiple buildings on site from various years; earliest buildings are Midcentury Modern and later buildings are Neo-Japanese/Modern. The central building features a steeply pitched gable roof with a gabled monitor, gray clay barrel tiles, and; a wrap-around "engawa" porch with covered section facing central campus courtyard. Other buildings have low-pitched gable roofs. A Japanese style rock garden is located between the the two largest buildings, and several landscaped areas are located in the front of the buildings.
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP16. Religious building
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
April 26, 2024
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1957; Mountain View Buddhist T emple Website and
1960 aerial photo
*P7. Owner and Address:
MOUNTAIN VIEW BUDDHIST TEMPLE, 575 N
SHORELINE BLVD, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94043
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 575 N SHORELINE BL
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name: Mountain View Buddhist T emple
B3. Original Use: Religious B4. Present Use: Religious
*B5. Architectural Style: Midcentury Modern, Neo-Japanese *B6. Construction History:
The first temple and social hall were completed in 1957. The education building and first parsonage (minister's residence) were completed in 1967. A second minister's residence (closest to N. Shoreline Blvd.) was completed in 1973. A new temple (central building with steep gable roof) broke ground in early 1978 and was completed in 1979; a new social hall to the south and rock garden appear to have been installed around this time.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: T emple, social hall, education building, minister's residence, garden B9a. Architect: Seiichi Kami b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Civic Growth and Social, Religious & Cultural Development (1945-1979) Area: Mountain View
Period of Significance: 1957-1979 Property Type: Religious Applicable NR/CR Criteria: 1 (Events) Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion b (Events) Statement of Significance:
The property is a Buddhist temple in the North Whisman neighborhood, associated with the theme of Civic Growth and Social, Religious, and Cultural Development (1945-1979) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. The property has Midcentury Modern style buildings as well as buildings that combine Modernist elements with Neo-Japanese architecture.
The Japanese community has a long history in Mountain View, however, after most Japanese residents were interned in concentration camps by the United States government during World War II, the community had to fight to reestablish its roots and heal from a collective trauma.
Not able to return to the Mockbee Building after World War II where they had previously met, the Japanese Buddhist community in Mountain View used the Japanese language school building (260 View Street, demolished 1962) for various activities, but foresaw the need for a larger, permanent space for religious as well as social and cultural activities. In 1954, the same year the group incorporated as the Mountain View Buddhist Association (renamed the Mountain View Buddhist T emple in 1970). They had raised enough money to purchase a one-and-a-half-acre property on Stierlin Road (now addressed 575 N. Shoreline Boulevard) in 1954. Berkeley-based architect Seiichi Kami was hired to design the first temple and social hall, completed in 1957.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
HP4. Ancillary building, HP13. Community center/social hall, HP36. Ethnic minority property (Japanese/Japanese American)
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
None
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
A storage building was constructed in 1982, as well as a columbarium addition to the temple. Original wood siding was replaced on several buildings in 1991. In 1998, a second storage building replaced the first parsonage building.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
The butsudan (Buddhist shrine or altar), which had originally been donated to the group by T omokichi Furuichi of Los Altos, was installed in the new temple. The Buddhist community continued to grow and was able to purchase an additional 6.9-acres adjoining the site in 1963 and develop a site master plan in 1966. The campus complex grew through the 1960s and into the 1980s. A new temple, the prominent central Neo-Japanese style building with a steep gable roof, was completed in 1979, and the old temple was subsequently renamed Young Buddhist Association (YBA) Hall. While the first buildings constructed in the 1960s are Midcentury Modern in style, the 1970s buildings have Modernist elements but with traditional Japanese architectural features. 575 N Shoreline Boulevard appears eligible for the California Register and Mountain View Register at the local level under Criterion 1/b (Events) for its direct and significant association with the Japanese Buddhist ethnic and religious community in Mountain View. The history of the Japanese Buddhist community in Mountain View stretches back to the early 1900s and, in addition to being a religious institution, the Mountain View Buddhist T emple as an organization has been involved in community efforts around language and education. The site represents the first purpose-built facilities constructed by and for the Japanese Buddhist community of Mountain View, following the disruption and displacement of the community by the U.S. government's program of interment of Japanese and Japanese Americans during World War II. The property is associated with a broader community and does not appear to be associated with one particular individual under Criterion B/2/a (Persons). The buildings are typical expressions of Midcentury Modern and Neo-Japanese architecture and do not appear to rise to a level of significance required for designation under Criterion C/3/c (Architecture).
The period of significance for the property under Criterion 1/b (Events) appears to be 1957, the year of construction of the first temple and social hall, through c.1979 when the new temple was completed. The property meets age-eligibility requirements for designation in the California Register and Mountain View Register with the 1957-c.1979 period of significance. While the property appears to be eligible for listing in the National Register, further research would be required to determine whether the property has "exceptional significance" for eligibility under Criterion G (Properties Less than 50 Years Old), or whether only a portion of the site is age-eligible and significant for listing in the National Register.
The property appears to retain sufficient historic integrity for listing on the California Register and Mountain View Register. The complex has evolved over time, but the original temple and education building are extant. Replacement of exterior wood siding has diminished integrity of materials and design to agree, although the overall site design retains integrity to the period of significance. Importantly, the property retains integrity of location, feeling, and association with the Japanese Buddhist community.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing of buildings, including the old temple (YBA Hall), education building, parsonage (minister's residence), Sangha hall, and new temple (Hondo)
Gable roof forms
Original cladding and exterior decorative features
Siting and spatial relationship between buildings
Japanese style rock garden.
Continuation of B12. References:
Mountain View Buddhist T emple. “Our History.” Accessed online March 13, 2023, https:/ /mvbuddhisttemple.org/about-mvbt/our- history/.
NETR Online, aerial photographs, 1948-2020. Accessed online October 2024, https:/ /www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date
P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: Not for Publication ✓ Unrestricted *a. County: Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address: 472 S SHORELINE BL City: Mountain View Zip: 94041-1928 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number (APN): 15425052 *P3a. Description:
Architectural Style: Folk Victorian/National Folk Plan Shape: Irregular Construction Type: Wood Frame Number of Stories: 1
Roof Style: Gable Roof Material: Asphalt - Shingle
Exterior Material: Wood - Drop/Groove, Wood - Shingle Primary Door Material: Wood Window Style: Bay Window, Casement, Hung Window Material: Wood Porch: Partial Width Garage: Detached Garage
Other Architectural/Site Features: Flared gable eave on one side of projecting front bay; decorative wood brackets at turned wood porch posts; exterior brick chimney; wood shingles (scalloped and straight) in gable ends. *P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single family property
*P4. Resources Present:
✓ Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5a. Photo
P5b. Description of Photo:
May 3, 2023
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
✓ Historic Prehistoric Both
1910; Santa Clara County Assessor
*P7. Owner and Address:
STAFFORD DIANE E AND ROBERT K, 472 S
SHORELINE BLVD, MOUNTAIN VIEW CA 94041
*P8. Recorded by:
Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San
Francisco CA 94108
*P9. Date Recorded:
January 2, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Intensive
*P11. Report Citation: Page & Turnbull, "City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement," prepared for City of Mountain View, Final Draft, October 1, 2024.
*Attachments:
NONE Location Map Sketch Map ✓ Continuation Sheet ✓ Building, Structure and Object Record Archaeological Record District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record Rock Art Record Artifact Record Photograph Record Other
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
*Resource Name or # 472 S SHORELINE BL
B1. Historic Name:
B2. Common Name:
B3. Original Use: Residential - Single-Family B4. Present Use: Residential - Single-Family *B5. Architectural Style: Folk Victorian/National Folk
*B6. Construction History:
472 S Shoreline Boulevard was built in 1910. It first appears on the 1921 Sanborn Insurance map, which shows the original building footprint with an L-shaped front porch, an open rear porch, as well as a rear ancillary building and a water tank house.
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved? ✓ No Yes Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: None
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Development (1910-1944) Area: Mountain View Period of Significance: 1910 Property Type: Residential - Single-Family Applicable NR/CR Criteria: None Mountain View Register of Historic Resources Criteria: MVRHR Criterion c (Design) Statement of Significance:
472 S Shoreline Boulevard is a Folk Victorian single-family residence located in the Shoreline West neighborhood, associated with the theme of Residential Development (1910-1944) as elaborated in the City of Mountain View Historic Context Statement. The property was built in 1910 and originally featured a water tank set back behind the main residence.
The residence was part of the larger pattern of residential development in surrounding blocks spurred by the need to house employees of the Pacific Press Association, whose printing facility was located nearby at 1340 Villa Street. The neighborhood now referred to as "Shoreline West" grew as a residential area at what was then the west edge of Mountain View following the 1904 relocation of the Seventh-day Adventist publisher, the Pacific Press publishing company from Oakland, where it was established in 1874. Some 100 Seventh-day Adventist families moved to the area with the business, building their homes in the blocks along Mariposa Street, Pettis Avenue, Palo Alto Avenue, and Mountain View Avenue. The Pacifi c Press Association established an industrial enterprise in a town which previously had a population of around 600 and whose economy was based in agriculture. In subsequent decades, members of the Seventh-day Adventist community also built local institutions such as the Mountain View Academy high school, established in 1922, and became active in local politics. By the start of World War II, the neighborhood consisted of dense residential blocks interspersed with patches of orchards remaining from its previous agricultural use. The publishing plant remained in operation in Mountain View until 1984, when operations relocated to Idaho and the site was redeveloped.
See Continuation Sheet.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes:
None
*B12. References:
See Continuation Sheet.
B13. Remarks:
The property is currently listed on the Mountain View Register.
*B14. Evaluator: Page & Turnbull, 170 Maiden Lane, 5th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94108
*Date of Evaluation: January 2, 2025
Sketch Map
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial
*Recorded by: Page & Turnbull *Date: January 2, 2025 ✓
Continuation Update
Continuation of B6. Construction History
By 1943, the water tank house was removed, and a small detached garage was constructed. From visual analysis, several alterations and additions were noted including removal of part of the L-shaped front porch, installation of a bay window at the primary facade, and two one- story hipped roof additions to the rear facade. The windows appear to have been replaced in-kind.
Continuation of B10. Statement of Significance
472 S Shoreline Boulevard is currently listed in the Mountain View Register and retains eligibility for listing under Criterion c as a surviving and rare local example of an early 20th-century transitional Folk Victorian cottage. Due to the removal of part of the original front porch, installation of a bay window, and two additions to the rear facade, the property does not retain sufficient historic integrity for listing in the National Register and/or California Register. As currently written, the Mountain View Historic Preservation Ordinance does not provide a definition of historic integrity or threshold for integrity assessment, and a somewhat lower threshold of historic integrity compared to National Register and California Register-eligible properties may be utilized in assessing properties of local significance for the Mountain View Register. The residence retains its original roofline and enough of its original design and materials to sufficiently convey its local significance for Mountain View Register eligibility. The period of significance is 1910, the year of construction.
The character-defining features of the resource include:
Overall form and massing (excluding rear additions)
Flared gable eave on the projecting front bay
Decorative wood brackets at turned wood porch posts
Horizontal tongue and groove wood siding
Wood shingle siding (scalloped and straight) in gable ends Multi-lite wood sash windows.
Continuation of B12. References:
Ignoffo, Mary Jo. "Milestones: A History of Mountain View, California." Cupertino, CA: California History Center, 2002.
NETR Online, aerial photographs, 1948-2020. Accessed online September 2024, https:/ /www.historicaerials.com/viewer.
Perry, Nicholas. "Mountain View." Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing, 2006.
Sanborn Map Company, fire insurance maps (1904, 1921, 1943, 1956). Accessed via San Francisco Public Library.
DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
DRAFT
P1. Other Identifier:
DPR 523A (9/2013) *Required information
State of California The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Sta tus Code
Other Listings
Review Cod e Reviewer Date
*P2. Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County : Santa Clara *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Mountain View (Date: 2021)
c. Address : 462 Sleeper Avenue City: Mountain View Zip: 94040 d. UTM:
e. Other Locational Data: Assessor Parcel Number 197-37-026 *P3a. Descr
iption:
Architectural Style: Folk Victorian/National Folk
Construction Tyle: Wood Frame
Roof Style: Gable
Exterior Material: Wood – Drop/Grove
Window Style: Double Hung, Casement
Porch: Wraparound with Hip Roof
Plan Shape: Rectangular
Number of Stories: 2.5
Roof Material: Asphalt Shingle
Primary Door Material: Wood
Window Material: Wood
Garage: Detached Rear Carport
Other Architectural/Site Features: Gabled dormer on west roof slope, stickwork on primary roof gable-end.
Alterations: It appears that the east portion of the wraparound porch and a rear porch have been enclosed. On the primary (south) façade, a second entry door with transom has been added, indicative of internal subdivision for use as a multi-family residential dwelling.
*P3b. Res
ource Attributes: HP2. Single Family Property
*P4. Resources Present: Building Structure Object Site District Element of District Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Desc
ription of Photo: Primary
façade, looking northwest. June 5,
2023.
*P6. Date C
onstructed/Age, Source: