Mountain View City Council
March 10, 2026

Preliminary Arborist Report, TDDG June 2024
21911 Dolores Ave. Cupertino, CA Page 1
HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Arborist Report
515 – 525 N. Whisman Road
Mountain View, CA
PREPARED FOR:

EQ Management, LLC
233 S. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
PREPARED BY:

HortScience | Bartlett Consulting
2550 Ninth Street
Suite 112
Berkeley, CA 94710
January 2026
Attachment 8
HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 2550 Ninth Street, Suite 112 ● Berkeley, CA 94710 ● 925.484.0211 ● www.hortscience.com

Arborist Report
515 – 525 N. Whisman Road
Mountain View, CA
Table of Contents

Page
Introduction and Overview 1 Assessment Methods 1 Description of Trees 2 City of Mountain View Tree Protection Requirements 7 Suitability for Preservation 7 Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations 9 Tree Preservation Guidelines 9

List of Tables

Table 1. Condition ratings and frequency of occurrence 2

Table 2. Tree suitability for preservation 8

Exhibits
Tree Assessment Map Tree Assessment Form Tree Disposition

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Arborist Report
515 – 525 N. Whisman Road
Mountain View, CA

Introduction and Overview
EQ Management, LLC is preparing plans to redevelop the subject property. Current site use consists of two commercial buildings, a courtyard, round-about driveway, multiple parking lots, and landscaping. Trees were located along the boundaries, in the parking lots, and within the landscaped areas that encompassed the west side of the property. HortScience | Bartlett Consulting (Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company) was asked to prepare an Arborist Report as required by the City of Mountain View.

This report provides the following information:

1. An assessment of tree health, structure, suitability for preservation, and protected status within and adjacent to the project area.

2. An evaluation of the impacts to trees based on most recent plans provided by the client.

3. Tree preservation guidelines.

Assessment Methods
Trees were assessed on February 5, 2025 and January 22, 2026. All trees measuring 4 inches and greater in diameter were included in the assessment. The assessment procedure consisted of the following steps:

1. Identifying the tree species with a trunk diameter of 4 inches and greater within the property and adjacent trees overhanging the property;

2. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a map;

3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54 inches above grade;

4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 – 5:
5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species.
4 - Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected.
3 - Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated with regular care.
2 - Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. 1 - Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated.

5. Rating the suitability for preservation as “high,” “moderate,” or “low.” Suitability for preservation considers the health, age, and structural condition of the tree, as well as its potential to remain an asset to the site for years to come.

High: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the potential for longevity at the site.

Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects than can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more intense management and monitoring and may have shorter life span than those in the ‘high’ category.

Low: Trees in poor health or with significant structural defects that cannot be mitigated. Tree is expected to continue to decline, regardless of treatment. The species or individual may have characteristics that are undesirable for landscapes and generally are unsuited for use areas.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 2

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Description of Trees
Three hundred thirty-five (335) trees were assessed, representing 22 species (Table 1). Two- thirds of the trees were in fair condition (219 trees, 65% of the population). Sixty-six (66 or 20%) were in good condition and 49 trees (15%) were poor. Southern magnolia #21 was dead. Coast live oak is native to the area but none of the assessed trees were indigenous to the site. Trees were utilized for screening and as accents throughout the property. Sixteen (16) trees were located in the parkway strip along N. Whisman Road. Trees along the south and east boundaries were topped and pruned away from transmission and utility lines. Otherwise, trees appeared vigorous and well-maintained.

Descriptions of each tree can be found in the Tree Assessment Form, and approximate locations are shown on the Tree Assessment Map (see Exhibits).

Table 1. Tree condition ratings and frequency of occurrence 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View CA
Common Name Scientific Name Condition Total
Dead
(0) Poor
(1-2)
Fair
(3)
Good
(4-5)

Blackwood acacia Acacia melanoxylon - 11 4 - 15
Japanese maple Acer palmatum - - 5 1 6
Marina madrone Arbutus 'Marina' - - 1 1 2
Eastern redbud Cercis canadensis - - 1 - 1
Silver dollar gum Eucalyptus polyanthemos - - 1 1 2
Evergreen ash Fraxinus uhdei - 4 15 1 20
Crape myrtle Lagerstroemia indica - - 1 1 2
Glossy privet Ligustrum lucidum - - 1 - 1
Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua - 1 1 1 3
Southern magnolia Magnolia grandiflora 1 3 3 1 8
Carolina laurel cherry Prunus caroliniana - 1 - - 1
Olive Olea europaea - 1 2 - 3
Canary Island pine Pinus canariensis - 2 21 3 26
Monterey pine Pinus radiata - 1 1 - 2
London plane Platanus x hispanica - 9 86 29 124
Callery pear Pyrus calleryana - 2 11 1 14
Coast live oak Quercus agrifolia - 1 1 - 2
Red oak Quercus rubra - - 19 1 20
Southern live oak Quercus virginiana - 2 8 - 10
Purple Robe locust Robinia ambigua 'Purple Robe' - 10 1 - 11 Coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens - - 33 25 58
Chinese elm Ulmus parvifolia - 1 3 - 4

Total 1 49 219 66 335

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 3

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Of the 124 London plane trees, 86 were in fair condition, 29 were in good condition, and nine were poor. Trees were located throughout the property, primarily in small parking lot strips and islands. Development stage ranged from immature to mature with trunk diameters of 4 – 20 inches. Semi-mature and mature trees in good condition grew in significant landscaping areas in the central courtyard and
along the west side of the
site (Photo 1).

Sixteen (16) London planes grew in the parkway strip along N. Whisman Road. They were in fair and poor condition. Roots had developed into a block where they had been confined within a basin (Photo 2). Tree #191 was a parking lot tree in good condition with good structure and a vigorous, balanced crown. It grew in a narrow island with a metal grate and had impacted a charging station (Photo 3 and Inset).

Photo 2: Street
tree roots were
shaped by the
previous basins.

Photo 1: Looking east
at mature London
planes #106, 107 (L)
and 109, 110 (R) in the
central courtyard.

Photo 3 and Inset: London plane #191 grew through a metal grate and abutted a charging station.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 4

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Fifty-eight (58) coast redwoods were assessed. Most grew in groves within park-like landscape areas, while the remainder were located in narrow strips along boundaries (Photo 4). Thirty-three (33) were in fair condition and 25 were good.

Photo 4: Coast redwoods lined boundaries in narrow planters. Canary Island pines (L) and southern live oak (R) grew alongside them.

Overall, redwoods were semi-mature to mature in
development, with trunk diameters that ranged from
14 – 35 inches. Tree #230 was immature with a 7-
inch-diameter trunk. Trees exhibited the typical form
and structure of the species along with excellent
foliar density and color, except where crowns had
been pruned to provide clearance to utility lines.

Trees #27, 64, and 91 were specimen trees in
excellent condition (Photo 5).

Canary Island pine was represented by 26
individuals. Development was mature with trunk
diameters of 14 – 23 inches. Trees were in small
groups and in fair to good condition. Of the two trees in poor condition, #272 had a westerly lean, poor
structure, and extensive sap exudate on the trunk.

Tree #323 had been topped below transmission lines
and had a sparse, one-sided crown.

Twenty (20) evergreen ash trees grew in landscape
strips and planters throughout the site. Condition
was mostly fair. Trees #97, 101, 139, and 140 were
poor, while condition of tree #98 was good. It had good structure, a vigorous crown, and extensive surface
roots which extended over 30 feet from the trunk.

Overall ash tree structure was poor with narrow attachments, crossing branches, and decay or cavities in stems and unions. Trees #131, 132, 140, and 172 were semi-mature in development with trunk diameters of 6 – 9 inches. The remaining 16 trees had trunks that ranged from 11 – 24 inches in diameter, indicating a mature development stage.

Twenty (20) red oaks were located across the site. Nearly all were in fair condition. Trees #49, 50, 51, and 56 grew singly in open landscaping. Tree #49 was in good condition and had a wide, balanced crown with good structure. The remaining 16 trees were located in narrow planters between either a building and sidewalk or retaining wall and parking lot.

Photo 5: Coast redwood #64 (R)
was in excellent condition.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 5

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Of the 15 blackwood acacia trees, 11 were in poor condition. Trees #257, 282, 283, and 322 were fair. Overall structure was poor with trunk lean, narrow attachments, and a history of poor pruning. Roots had been removed on trees #256 and 257. Tree #283 was a stump sprout adjacent to a power pole. Tree #334 was codominant at 5 feet, swept east, and had a large crack in the east stem which extended from attachment to elbow.

Callery pear was represented by 14 trees. Most were in fair condition and grew in narrow landscaping strips between a building and sidewalk. Trees #42 and 104 were in poor condition.

Tree #122 was in good condition with good structure and a vigorous crown. It was semi-mature in development with a 6-inch-wide trunk. Overall, development was semi-mature with an average trunk diameter of 9 inches.

Eleven (11) Purple Robe locust trees grew in
parking lot islands. Condition was mostly
poor and very poor. Six trees were all but
dead (Photo 6 and Inset). Tree #148 was in
fair condition with fair structure and a
narrow, moderately vigorous crown.

Ten (10) southern live oaks grew in
significant landscape areas on the west side
of the site and in narrow boundary strips to
the south and north. Condition was mostly
fair. Trees #36 and 302 were in poor
condition with poor structure and a history of
poor pruning. Trunk diameters ranged from
9 – 19 inches, indicating trees were semi-
mature and mature.

Eight southern magnolias were semi-mature
in development with trunk diameters that
ranged from 5 – 9 inches. Trees were either
generally crowded and/or suppressed.

Three trees were poor in condition and three
trees were fair. Tree #20 was a good young
tree with good structure and vigor. Tree #21
was standing dead.

Japanese maples #125 – 130 grew in a narrow landscape strip between a building and sidewalk.

Structure was fair with multiple attachments at base and the round form typical of the species.

Most were in fair condition. Tree #125 was in good condition. It had an open, vigorous crown.

Four Chinese elms grew along the north boundary. Trees #16, 284, and 294 were off-site with branches that extended approximately 15 – 20 feet into the property. Tree #15 grew adjacent to a sidewalk and was heavily suppressed. All had good vigor. Structure was poor and very poor with a history of poor pruning and branch failure. Condition was poor to fair.

Three olive and three sweetgum trees were assessed. Olive trees #111 and 113 were in fair condition. Olive #112 was poor. All had multiple attachments from the base and were semi- mature in development with stem diameters that ranged from 3 – 5 inches. Sweetgums #68 and 69 grew adjacent to a sidewalk bulb-out underneath utility and power lines. Condition was poor and fair, respectively. Structure was poor and trees were suppressed. Sweetgum #156 grew singly in a large peninsula. It was in good condition with good structure and a vigorous crown.

Photo 6 (left) and Inset: Purple Robe locust
#201 was all but dead with very low vigor and
extensive bark loss on the trunk and branches.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 6

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company The following species were represented by two or fewer trees:

 Two coast live oaks grew in dense landscaping at the northwest corner of the site. Tree #26 was semi-mature with a trunk diameter of 6 inches. It was in poor condition with a sinuous single stem, poor structure, and chlorotic foliage. Tree #33 was mature and in fair condition with an open, vigorous crown. Root flare was exposed and surface roots were extensive.

 Crape myrtles #159 and 160 accented the entrance of a building. Trees were mature with trunk diameters of 10 and 8 inches, respectively. Form and structure were typical for the species. Tree #159 was in good condition while tree #160 was fair.

 Two Marina madrones grew at the edge of a grove. Tree #71 was in good condition with good structure and vigorous crown. Tree #72 was in fair condition. It was suppressed and leaned to the south.

 Mature Monterey pine trees #224 and 226 were topped below power lines. Tree #224 grew in an 8-foot sidewalk bulb-out. It was in fair condition with moderate vigor and a trunk diameter of 30 inches. Tree #226 was crowded among other trees in a narrow landscape strip. It was in poor condition with poor structure and low vigor.

 Two mature silver-dollar trees dominated the west corners of the site. Tree #14 had a 38-inch diameter trunk and was in fair condition with a wide, open crown. Tree #84 grew near a sidewalk and was in good condition with a 36-inch trunk. Crown was compact and vigorous. Branches had been pruned away from utility and power lines, resulting in asymmetry to the east (Photo 7).

 Carolina laurel cherry #303 was a
volunteer in poor condition adjacent to
a power pole. It was suppressed and
crowded with very poor structure and a
vigorous crown.

 Eastern redbud #1 accented the main
entrance. It was a mature tree in fair
condition. Structure was poor with a
history of poor pruning. Crown was
vigorous and asymmetric to the east.

 Glossy privet #24 represented a grove
of approximately 50 similar-sized and
smaller trees which had colonized a
portion of the north boundary. The
property line was unclear, therefore
ownership of trees was undetermined.

Photo 7: Silver dollar tree #84 was
pruned away from power lines.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 7

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company City of Mountain View Tree Protection Requirements
The City of Mountain View Code of Ordinances, Chapter 32, Article II, designates all cedars (Cedrus), oaks (Quercus), and redwoods (Sequoia) 12 inches and greater in trunk circumference, and any other species 48 inches and greater in trunk circumference, protected Heritage trees.

Circumference is to be measured at 54 inches above natural grade. Street trees are also protected.

Based on these criteria, 167 trees were protected (151 Heritage, 16 Street). All protected trees will require a permit for removal. Individual tree designations are located in the Tree Assessment Form (see Exhibits).

Suitability for Preservation
Before evaluating the impacts that will occur during development, it is important to consider the quality of the tree resource itself, and the potential for individual trees to function well over an extended length of time. Trees that are preserved on development sites must be carefully selected to make sure that they may survive development impacts, adapt to a new environment and perform well in the landscape.

Our goal is to identify trees that have the potential for long-term health, structural stability, and longevity. For trees growing in open fields, away from areas where people and property are present, structural defects and/or poor health present a low risk of damage or injury if they fail.

However, we must be concerned about safety in use areas. Therefore, where development encroaches into existing plantings, we must consider their structural stability as well as their potential to grow and thrive in a new environment. Where development will not occur, the normal life cycles of decline, structural failure and death should be allowed to continue.

Evaluation of suitability for preservation considers several factors:
 Tree health
Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, demolition of existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil compaction than are non-vigorous trees. Coast redwoods #27, 64 and 91, and London plane #48 were in excellent condition with good structure and vigorous, balanced crowns. They would make excellent candidates for preservation.
 Structural integrity
Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that cannot be corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in areas where damage to people or property is likely. For example, Purple Robe locusts #180, 201, 205, 223, 269, and 270 had low vigor with extensive decay columns and dieback. These trees would not be suitable for preservation in a use area.
 Species response
There is a wide variation in the response of individual species to construction impacts and changes in the environment. Chinese elm and coast redwood, for instance, are tolerant of root loss and impacts from construction but require supplemental irrigation post-injury. Coast live oak, on the other hand, is tolerant of root severance but intolerant of impacts from construction and frequent summer irrigation.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 8

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company  Tree age and longevity
Old trees, while having significant emotional and aesthetic appeal, have limited physiological capacity to adjust to an altered environment. Young trees are better able to generate new tissue and respond to change. Considering the London planes, for example, immature trees #137, 142, and 183 would be more likely to tolerate impacts than mature trees #62, 184, and 255.
 Invasiveness
Species which spread across a site and displace desired vegetation are not always appropriate for retention. This is particularly true when indigenous species are displaced.

The California Invasive Plant Inventory Database (http://www.cal-ipc.org/paf/) lists species identified as being invasive. Mountain View is part of the Central West Floristic Province. Blackwood acacia, glossy privet, and olive are listed as having limited invasive potential. Callery pear is on the watch list.

Each tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, structural condition and ability to safely coexist within a development environment (Table 2).

Table 2. Tree suitability for preservation
515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View CA

High Trees in this category had good health and structural stability that have the potential for longevity at the site. Of the assessed trees, 15 had high suitability for preservation: Canary Island pine #271, coast redwoods #4, 5, 13, 27, 28, 64, 73, 75 and 91, and London planes #48, 52, 184, 200 and 202.

Moderate Trees in this category have fair health and/or structural defects that may be abated with treatment. Trees require more intense management and monitoring and may have shorter lifespans than those in the “high” category.

One hundred ninety-three (193) trees had moderate suitability for preservation, including: 81 London planes, 39 coast redwoods, 15 Canary Island pines, 10 red oaks, southern live oaks #9, 25, 37 and 237, and coast live oak #33. Glossy privet #24 represented a grove of approximately 50 stems with moderate suitability for preservation.

Low Trees in this category are in poor health or have significant defects in structure that cannot be abated with treatment. These trees can be expected to decline regardless of management. The species or individual tree may possess characteristics that are undesirable in landscape settings or may be unsuited for use areas. One hundred twenty-six (126) trees or 38% of the population had low suitability for preservation. Among them were 38 London planes, 14 blackwood acacias, 10 coast redwoods, 10 Purple Robe locusts, 10 red oaks, southern live oaks #34, 36, 38, 231, 297 and 302, and coast live oak #26.

Note: Southern magnolia #21 was standing dead and not included in this table.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 9

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company We consider trees with high suitability for preservation to be the best candidates for preservation.

We do not recommend retention of trees with low suitability for preservation in areas where people or property will be present. Retention of trees with moderate suitability for preservation depends upon the intensity of proposed site changes.

Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations
Appropriate tree retention is a practical match between the location and intensity of construction activities with the quality and health of trees. The Tree Assessment Form was the reference point for tree condition and quality. Impacts from the proposed project were assessed using the Preliminary Site Plan prepared by CBG Civil Engineers (April 29, 2025). Street trees #304 and 305 were present at the site yet were not represented on the plans. Demolition, grading, drainage, stormwater, utility, and other plans that could affect trees were not reviewed for this report.

The development proposes to remove all interior structures, driveways, pathways and landscaping, and install multi-unit residences with alleys, driveways, and extensive landscaping.

Development will also replace the existing sidewalk and parkway strip along N. Whisman Road.

A sidewalk along the east boundary will be preserved. Proposed construction will encompass the vast majority of the site, leaving very little opportunity for tree preservation. Proposed landscaping along the north boundary and the retention of a sidewalk along the east boundary provide some ability to preserve trees.

Based on my evaluation of the proposed site plan, 16 on-site trees along the east boundary (9 Heritage) and off-site Heritage Chinese elms #16, 284, and 294 will be preserved. Three hundred sixteen (316) trees will be removed (155 Protected). Of these, 139 are Heritage and 16 are Street trees (London planes #304 – 319). All are within the development envelope.

Successful retention of trees to be preserved will depend on the care with which work is performed around the trees and all parties committing to the Tree Preservation Guidelines.

Recommendations for individual trees are provided in the Tree Disposition form (see Exhibits).

Tree Preservation Guidelines
Sixteen (16) street trees and 300 on-site trees (139 Heritage) will be removed. Three trees located off-site close to the project boundary and sixteen on-site trees will be retained.

Ownership of glossy privets will have to be determined. The following recommendations will help reduce impacts to preserved trees from development, and maintain their health and structural stability through the clearing, grading, and construction phases.

Design recommendations

1. Where possible, include the location of all trees within 10 feet of the project limit. Include trunk locations on all project plans.

2. The project’s perimeter fence will also serve as the TREE PROTECTION ZONE. The fence should enclose the project site along the west edge of the east sidewalk. No grading, excavation, construction or storage of materials should occur outside the project limit.

3. All plans affecting trees shall be reviewed by the Project Arborist regarding tree impacts.

These include, but are not limited to, demolition plans, grading plans, drainage plans, utility plans, and landscape and irrigation plans.

4. Irrigation systems must be designed so that no trenching severs roots larger than 2 inches in diameter within the TREE PROTECTION ZONE.

5. Any herbicides placed under paving materials must be safe for use around trees and labeled for that use.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 10

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Pre-demolition and pre-construction treatments and recommendations

1. The project’s perimeter fence will serve as the TREE PROTECTION ZONE for off-site trees.

No grading, excavation, construction, or storage of materials should occur outside the project limit.

2. Where demolition must occur close to trees, such as
removing pavement and hardscaping as needed for
regrading, install temporary trunk protection devices
such as winding silt sock wattle or wood planks
around trunks (Figure 1). Any low branches that are
within the work zone should also be protected.

Remove trunk protection after demolition is completed
and install protective fencing at the limits of the tree protection zone. Do not retain wattling around tree
trunks for more than 2 – 3 weeks to avoid
damaging trunks from excess moisture.

3. Off-site trees to be preserved may require pruning to provide clearance for demolition, grading and
construction. This is especially true for Chinese elms #16, 284, and 294. The tree care firm providing the
pruning shall be a State of California Licensed Tree
Contractor (C61/D49). All pruning shall be done by
Certified Arborist or Certified Tree Worker in
accordance with the latest edition of the Best
Management Practices for Pruning (International
Society of Arboriculture) and the American National
Standard for Tree Care Operations (Z133.1) and Pruning (A300).

4. Tree(s) to be removed that have branches extending into the canopy of tree(s) to remain shall be removed by a Certified Arborist or Certified Tree Worker and not by the demolition contractor. The Certified Arborist or Certified Tree Worker shall remove the trees in a manner that causes no damage to the tree(s) and understory to remain.

5. Trees to be removed shall be felled so as to fall away from TREE PROTECTION ZONE and avoid pulling and breaking of roots of off-site trees to remain. If roots are entwined, the Project Arborist may require first severing the major woody root mass before extracting the trees.

6. All tree work shall comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as well as California Fish and Wildlife code 3503-3513 to not disturb nesting birds. To the extent feasible, tree pruning and removal should be scheduled outside of the breeding season. Breeding bird surveys should be conducted prior to tree work. Qualified biologists should be involved in establishing work buffers for active nests.

Figure 1: Silt sock wattle
wound around trunks and
wrapped in snow fencing.

Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 11

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Recommendations for tree protection during construction

1. Any approved grading, construction, demolition, or other work within 1 foot of the TREE PROTECTION ZONE should be monitored by the Project Arborist.

2. Any root pruning that will occur within 1 foot of the TREE PROTECTION ZONE shall receive prior approval of and may be supervised by the Project Arborist. Roots should be cut with a saw to provide a flat and smooth cut. Removal of roots larger than 2 inches in diameter should be avoided.

3. If roots 2 inches and greater in diameter are encountered during site work and must be cut to complete the construction, the Project Arborist must be consulted to evaluate effects on the health and stability of the tree and recommend treatment.

4. If injury should occur to any tree during construction, it should be evaluated as soon as possible by the Project Arborist so that appropriate treatments can be applied.

Maintenance of impacted trees
Preserved trees will experience a physical environment different from that of pre-development.

As a result, tree health and structural stability should be monitored. Occasional pruning, fertilization, mulch, pest management, replanting, and irrigation may be required. In addition, provisions for monitoring both tree health and structural stability following construction must be made a priority.

Our procedures included assessing trees for observable defects in structure. This is not to say that trees without significant defects will not fail. Failure of apparently defect-free trees does occur, especially during storm events. Wind forces, for example, can exceed the strength of defect-free wood causing branches and trunks to break. Wind forces coupled with rain can saturate soils, reducing their ability to hold roots, and blow over defect-free trees. Although we cannot predict all failures, identifying those trees with observable defects is a critical component of enhancing public safety.

Furthermore, trees change over time. Our inspections represent the condition of the tree at the time of inspection. As trees age, the likelihood of failure of branches or entire trees increases.

Annual tree inspections are recommended to identify changes to tree health and structure. In addition, trees should be inspected after storms of unusual severity to evaluate damage and structural changes. Initiating these inspections is the responsibility of the client and/or tree owner.

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding my observations or recommendations.

HortScience | Bartlett Consulting
Scott Wheeler, Project Arborist
Registered Consulting Arborist #881
ISA BCMA #WE-10187B
ISA TRAQ | ASCA TPAQ
Arborist Report 515 – 525 N. Whisman Road, Mountain View EQ Management, LLC; January 2026 Page 12

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company

Exhibits

Tree Assessment Map

Tree Assessment

Tree Disposition

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
1 Eastern redbud 12 38 No 3 Moderate Leans N.; multiple attachments at 7’; poor pruning; poor structure; shoots
from wounds; vigorous; crowded;
asymmetric to E.
2 Coast redwood 21 66 Heritage 3 Moderate Interior tree; typical form and structure; large gaps in crown; crowded.
3 Coast redwood 25 79 Heritage 4 Moderate Interior tree; typical form and structure; crowded.
4 Coast redwood 21 66 Heritage 4 High Edge tree; typical form and structure; slight gaps in crown.
5 Coast redwood 28 88 Heritage 4 High Edge tree; typical form and structure; vigorous.
6 Coast redwood 24 75 Heritage 4 Moderate Interior tree; crowded; typical form and structure; asymmetric crown S.
7 Coast redwood 26 82 Heritage 4 Moderate Interior tree; typical form and structure; crowded; asymmetric crown N.
8 Coast redwood 25 79 Heritage 4 Moderate Edge tree; slight lean W.; typical form and structure; crowded; asymmetric
crown W.
9 Southern live oak 14 44 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 9’; suppressed; asymmetric crown N.; moderate 1-2”
branch dieback.
10 Southern magnolia 9 28 No 3 Low Suppressed; asymmetric crown W.; sparse rangy crown.
11 Southern magnolia 9 28 No 3 Low Suppressed; crowded; asymmetric crown W.; sparse rangy crown.
12 London plane 10 31 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 9’; crowded; open crown; asymmetric crown bows S.

Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
13 Coast redwood 29 91 Heritage 4 High Typical form and structure; crowded; excellent foliage color; pruned away
from power lines.
14 Silver dollar gum 38 119 Heritage 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 15’; open spreading crown; history of branch
failure; vigorous.
15 Chinese elm 10 31 No 2 Low 5’ from sidewalk; multiple attachments at 10’; hard bow S.; severely
asymmetric S.; suppressed; poor
structure.
16 Chinese elm 16 50 Heritage 3 Low Off site; tagged. Overhangs 20’; codominant at 6’; pruned hard away
from power pole; severely asymmetric
crown S.
17 London plane 17 53 Heritage 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 12’; crowded; asymmetric crown S.; poor structure.
18 London plane 11 35 No 2 Low Bows S.; suppressed; crowded; narrow crown; poor structure.
19 London plane 7 22 No 2 Low Leans E.; suppressed; high narrow crown; poor structure.
20 Southern magnolia 8 25 No 4 Moderate Good young tree; crowded; good structure.
21 Southern magnolia 8 25 No 0 -- Standing dead.
22 Southern magnolia 5 16 No 2 Low Crowded; suppressed; poor structure; low vigor.
23 Southern magnolia 5 16 No 2 Low Crowded; suppressed; poor structure; low vigor.
24 Glossy privet 5 16 No 3 Moderate 50 stem grove along boundary; 5” and smaller; some on site some off site;
overhangs up to 10’; crowded; rangy.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
25 Southern live oak 10 31 Heritage 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 10’; crowded; asymmetric crown S.; moderate vigor.
26 Coast live oak 6 19 Heritage 2 Low Sinuous single stem weaves N; crowded; suppressed; poor structure;
chlorotic.
27 Coast redwood 21 66 Heritage 5 High Typical form and structure; excellent color and vigor; good young tree.
28 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 4 High Typical form and structure; crowded; interior tree; good young tree.
29 Coast redwood 14 44 Heritage 3 Moderate Typical form and structure; crowded; interior tree; gaps thru crown.
30 Canary Island pine 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 15’; narrow attachment; vigorous; crowded; edge
tree.
31 Canary Island pine 19 60 Heritage 3 Low Typical form and structure; crowded; edge tree; asymmetric crown S.; gaps
thru crown.
32 Evergreen ash 17 53 Heritage 3 Low Codominant stems at 6’; small cavity in attachment; small depression at
attachment N.; crowded; asymmetric
crown E.; in 17’ x 12’ landscape bulb
out.
33 Coast live oak 17 53 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 18’; overly exposed root flare; crowded; open
crown; vigorous.
34 Southern live oak 9 28 Heritage 3 Low Crowded interior tree; multiple attachments at 10’; low spreading
crown; poor structure; vigorous.
35 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Low Poor structure; large gap thru crown W.; minor 1” branch dieback.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
36 Southern live oak 9 28 Heritage 2 Low Crowded interior tree; multiple attachments at 9’; low spreading crown;
poor structure; extensive sm branch
dieback.
37 Southern live oak 14 44 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 9’; crowded; rangy crown; extensive 1” branch
dieback; epicormics.
38 Southern live oak 12 38 Heritage 3 Low Crowded; suppressed; interior tree; asymmetric crown W.; extensive 1”
branch dieback.
39 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate Typical form and structure; asymmetric crown W.; extensive gaps thru crown E.
40 Coast redwood 21 66 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; edge tree; slight lean W.; minor gaps thru crown;
vigorous.
41 Callery pear 8 25 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 6’; narrow attachments; history of branch failure;
pruned away from building; 6’ landscape
strip adjacent to building.
42 Callery pear 7 22 No 2 Low Codominant stems at 6’; removed center stem; narrow attachments; leans
N.; pruned away from building; 6’
landscape strip adjacent to building.
43 Callery pear 7 22 No 3 Low Codominant stems at 6’; narrow attachments; pruned away from
building; 6’ landscape strip adjacent to
building.
44 Evergreen ash 13 41 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 7’; cavity in attachment; asymmetric crown N.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
45 Evergreen ash 22 69 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 8’; very narrow attachments; included bark; crowded.
46 Evergreen ash 21 66 Heritage 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 7’; cavity in attachment; asymmetric crown S.; 1”
girdling root S.
47 London plane 12 38 No 3 Moderate Slight bow E.; poor taper; trunk swollen with shaggy bark at 3’; narrow base;
open crown.
48 London plane 11 35 No 5 High Good structure; balanced crown; room to grow; vigorous.
49 Red oak 14 44 Heritage 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 12’; edge tree; open spreading crown; slightly
asymmetric crown E.; good structure.
50 Red oak 12 38 Heritage 3 Moderate Crowded; asymmetric crown W.; good structure.
51 Red oak 13 41 Heritage 3 Low Multiple attachments at 6’; crowded interior tree; fused 5” branches at 9’;
poor structure.
52 London plane 13 41 No 4 High Multiple attachments at 8’; slightly asymmetric crown w.; good structure;
vigorous.
53 London plane 9 28 No 3 Moderate Leans SE.; crowded; narrow crown; poor structure.
54 London plane 10 31 No 3 Low Codominant stems at 18’; crowded; narrow crown; poor structure.
55 London plane 11 35 No 4 Moderate Leans E.; edge tree; good structure; vigorous.
56 Red oak 13 41 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 5’; history of poor pruning; poor structure; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
57 London plane 13 41 No 4 Moderate Leans S.; crowded; good structure; vigorous.
58 London plane 11 35 No 3 Moderate Leans S.; crowded; asymmetric crown S.; poor structure; vigorous.
59 London plane 9 28 No 3 Moderate Bows S.; asymmetric crown S.; poor structure; vigorous.
60 London plane 8 25 No 3 Moderate Bows W.; asymmetric crown W.; poor structure; vigorous.
61 London plane 8 25 No 3 Moderate Sweeps E.; crowded; narrow crown; poor structure; vigorous; epicormics.
62 London plane 19 60 Heritage 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 5’; open spreading crown; epicormics; vigorous.
63 London plane 7 22 No 3 Low Crowded; single sinuous stem; poor structure.
64 Coast redwood 35 110 Heritage 5 High Typical form and structure; vigorous edge tree in excellent condition.
65 Coast redwood 35 110 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; interior tree; crowded; slightly sparse; minor 1-3”
branch dieback.
66 Coast redwood 31 97 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; interior tree; crowded; slightly sparse; minor 1-3”
branch dieback.
67 Coast redwood 23 72 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; slight lean S.; edge tree; crowded; slightly sparse;
vigorous.
68 Sweetgum 19 60 Heritage 2 Low 4’ from sidewalk; terrible pruning; crowded; suppressed; bark sloughing
from central stems; headed and topped
away from power lines.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
69 Sweetgum 19 60 Heritage 3 Low 4’ from sidewalk; codominant stems at 15’; headed away from power lines.
70 London plane 10 31 No 3 Moderate Asymmetric crown E.; poor structure; vigorous.
71 Marina madrone 14 44 No 4 Moderate Good structure; vigorous; crowded; epicormics thru interior.
72 Marina madrone 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate Leans S.; codominant stems at 6’; crowded; suppressed; open crown;
epicormics.
73 Coast redwood 28 88 Heritage 4 High Typical form and structure; edge tree; slight gaps thru crown; vigorous.
74 Coast redwood 32 100 Heritage 3 Moderate Typical form and structure; edge tree; 2’ from sidewalk and client entryway sign;
gaps thru crown; pruned away from
power lines.
75 Coast redwood 32 100 Heritage 4 High Typical form and structure; edge tree adjacent to sidewalk; roots disrupting
concrete; vigorous; pruned away from
power lines.
76 Canary Island pine 14 44 No 3 Moderate Slight bow at base; crowded; Typical form and structure; vigorous.
77 Coast redwood 29 91 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; crowded; vigorous; excellent color.
78 Coast redwood 25 79 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; crowded; interior tree; vigorous; slight gaps thru
crown.
79 Coast redwood 26 82 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; crowded; vigorous; slight gaps thru crown.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
80 Canary Island pine 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate Typical form and structure; slight lean S.; top of berm; crowded; vigorous;
asymmetric crown W.; minor 1” branch
dieback.
81 Canary Island pine 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate Typical form and structure; sinuous single stem sweeps S.; top of berm;
crowded; vigorous; asymmetric crown
W.
82 Southern magnolia 6 19 No 2 Low Leans N.; sparse crown; moderate sm branch dieback.
83 Southern magnolia 7 22 No 3 Low Multiple attachments at 6’; moderate vigor; minor sm branch dieback.
84 Silver dollar gum 36 113 Heritage 4 Moderate Compact vigorous crown; pruned away from power lines; kino in small fissures
S.; buried root crown.
85 London plane 7 22 No 3 Moderate Leans S.; asymmetric crown S.; vigorous.
86 London plane 12 38 No 2 Low Codominant stems at 6’; high crown; poor structure; low vigor.
87 Canary Island pine 17 53 Heritage 3 Low Sinuous single stem; asymmetric crown S.; moderate 1” branch dieback;
moderate vigor.
88 Canary Island pine 15 47 No 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 10’; very narrow attachment; minor 1” branch dieback;
moderate vigor.
89 Evergreen ash 15 47 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 8’; crowded; asymmetric crown S.; extensive surface
roots.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
90 Canary Island pine 20 63 Heritage 3 Moderate Sinuous single stem; crowded; moderate 1” branch dieback; moderate
vigor.
91 Coast redwood 30 94 Heritage 5 High Typical form and structure; edge tree centered btwn fence corner, light pole,
and 2 trees; vigorous; excellent color.
92 London plane 12 38 No 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 7’; high crown; poor structure.
93 Canary Island pine 18 57 Heritage 4 Moderate Sinuous single stem; 3’ from curb; crook at 10’; gap in crown at 30’; vigorous.
94 Canary Island pine 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate Leans E.; gaps thru crown; history of branch failure; 7 x 4’ from curbs;
vigorous; asymmetric crown E.
95 Canary Island pine 19 60 Heritage 4 Moderate Typical form and structure; high crown; vigorous; excellent color; 4’ from fence
and curb; 3’ from hydrant and water line.
96 London plane 6 19 No 3 Moderate Suppressed; crowded; asymmetric crown N.
97 Evergreen ash 12 38 No 2 Low Heavy lean E.; codominant stems at 8’; very narrow attachment; suppressed;
poor structure.
98 Evergreen ash 22 69 Heritage 4 Moderate Sweeps E.; good structure; vigorous; crowded; 3’ from curb and drain; large
surface roots extend 30’ N.
99 London plane 10 31 No 3 Moderate Bows S.; asymmetric crown S.; history of poor pruning; vigorous.
100 Evergreen ash 21 66 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 8’; crowded; asymmetric crown W.; narrow
attachments.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
101 Evergreen ash 19 60 Heritage 2 Low Codominant stems at 8’; narrow attachments; upright crown; poor
structure.
102 Evergreen ash 24 75 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 7’; narrow attachments; upright crown; 5’ seam in
trunk W.
103 Callery pear 8 25 No 3 Low In 7’ planter been walk and building; very narrow attachments; poor pruning;
branch failure; vigorous.
104 Callery pear 7 22 No 2 Low In 7’ planter been walk and building; very narrow attachments; poor pruning;
very poor structure.
105 Callery pear 9 28 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 6’; narrow attachments;bows S; 5’ from building;
pruned away from building.
106 London plane 12 38 No 4 Moderate Slight lean E.; multiple attachments at 15’; asymmetric crown W.; crowded;
good structure; vigorous.
107 London plane 12 38 No 4 Moderate Asymmetric crown E.; crowded; good structure; vigorous; pruned away from
path.
108 Callery pear 13 41 No 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 6’; narrow attachments; leans N.; 6’ from building;
pruned away from building.
109 London plane 11 35 No 4 Moderate 4’ from walk and patio; asymmetric crown W.; crowded; pruned away from
path; vigorous.
110 London plane 14 44 No 4 Moderate Bows E.; pruned away from path; good structure; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
111 Olive 5,4,4,3 51 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; asymmetric crown S.; moderate 1”
branch dieback; moderate vigor.
112 Olive 5,4,3,3,3 56 Heritage 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; extensive 1” branch dieback; moderate vigor.
113 Olive 5,4,4,3 51 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; moderate 1” branch dieback; moderate vigor.
114 Canary Island pine 23 72 Heritage 3 Moderate Adjacent to walk, 3’ from sidewalk; 4” root cut at base E.; Typical form and
structure; yellowing.
115 Red oak 8 25 Heritage 3 Low Crowded; rangy crown; tall and spindly; vigorous.
116 Red oak 6 19 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 7’; poor pruning; poor structure; vigorous.
117 Red oak 9 28 Heritage 3 Low In 7’ wide landscape strip; asymmetric crown N.; heavy laterals N.; poor
structure; vigorous.
118 Red oak 9 28 Heritage 3 Low Asymmetric crown N.; multiple attachments at 15’; large gap in crown;
branch failure; poor structure; vigorous.
119 Red oak 11 35 Heritage 3 Low Corrected bow N.; codominant stems at 18’; asymmetric crown N.; vigorous.
120 Callery pear 9 28 No 3 Low Multiple attachments at 7’; narrow attachments; narrow crown; asymmetric
crown W.; poor pruning.
121 Callery pear 9 28 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 6’; narrow attachments; narrow crown; poor
pruning; 5’ from sidewalk.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
122 Callery pear 6 19 No 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 6’; narrow attachments; narrow crown; 5’ from
sidewalk; good young tree.
123 Callery pear 9 28 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 12’; narrow attachments; narrow crown; leans W.; 5’
from sidewalk.
124 Callery pear 12 38 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 12’; narrow attachments; 1’ long indent in main stem
at attachment; narrow crown; 5’ from
sidewalk.
125 Japanese maple 4,4,4 38 No 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; open crown; poor pruning; vigorous.
126 Japanese maple 5,4 28 No 3 Moderate Codominant stems at base; poor structure; minor 1” branch dieback;
vigorous.
127 Japanese maple 5,5,4 44 No 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; in 5’ landscape strip btwn sw & building; poor
structure; crossed stems; branch failure;
pruned away from building.
128 Japanese maple 5,4,4 41 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; in 5’ landscape strip btwn sw & building;
open structure; crossed branches;
pruned away from building.
129 Japanese maple 5,5,5 47 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; in 5’ landscape strip btwn sw & building;
open structure; pruned away from
building.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
130 Japanese maple 5,5 31 No 3 Moderate Codominant stems at base; in 5’ landscape strip btwn sw & building;
good structure; pruned away from
building.
131 Evergreen ash 7 22 No 3 Low In 5’ wide landscape strip; leans S; narrow crown; poor structure.
132 Evergreen ash 6 19 No 3 Low In 5’ wide landscape strip; asymmetric crown S; wide crown; poor structure.
133 London plane 6 19 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; multiple attachments at 8’; large gaps thru crown; vigorous.
134 London plane 5 16 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; asymmetric crown W.; good structure; pruned above parking
lot; vigorous.
135 London plane 5 16 No 2 Low In 4x4’ landscape strip; pruned above parking lot; poor structure.
136 London plane 5 16 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ landscape strip; pruned above parking lot; dense asymmetric crown W;
vigorous.
137 London plane 4 13 No 2 Low In 4x4’ landscape strip; leans E.; poor structure.
138 Evergreen ash 13 41 No 3 Moderate In 9’ landscape strip; leans S.; multiple attachments at 7’; asymmetric crown S;
poor structure.
139 Evergreen ash 11 35 No 2 Low In 9’ landscape strip; leans E.; decay in stub wound S. at 7’; high crown; poor
structure.
140 Evergreen ash 6 19 No 2 Low In 9’ landscaping strip; leans E.; high crown; poor structure.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
141 Evergreen ash 13 41 No 3 Moderate In 9’ landscaping strip; codominant stems at 8’; dense crown; poor
structure.
142 London plane 4 13 No 4 Moderate In 4x4’ landscape strip; pruned above parking lot; multiple attachments at 9’;
good structure.
143 London plane 8 25 No 4 Moderate In 4x4’ landscape strip; pruned above parking lot; corrected lean E.;
asymmetric crown W.; vigorous.
144 London plane 7 22 No 3 Moderate In 5’ wide landscaping strip; suppressed; asymmetric crown N.; good
structure.
145 London plane 17 53 Heritage 4 Moderate In 5’ wide landscaping strip; codominant stems at 6’; vigorous; good structure.
146 London plane 5 16 No 3 Moderate In 5’ wide landscaping strip; suppressed; asymmetric crown S.;
vigorous.
147 London plane 17 53 Heritage 4 Moderate In landscaping island 2’ and 4’ from curb; codominant stems at 8’ fused into
single stem; vigorous; good structure.
148 Purple Robe locust 10 31 No 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 8’; narrow crown; bark splitting along stems and branches;
moderate vigor; 4’ from 3 curbs, 3’ from
light pole.
149 London plane 7 22 No 3 Moderate In landscaping bulb out 4’ from curbs; slight lean E.; asymmetric crown S.;
poor structure; minor 1” branch dieback;
vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
150 Canary Island pine 15 47 No 3 Low 2 & 4’ from concrete; multiple attachments at 15’; main stem bows
around 6” branch at 15’; poor structure;
yellowing.
151 Red oak 7 22 Heritage 3 Moderate Suppressed; bows E.; wide spaced branches; moderate vigor.
152 Red oak 9 28 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 15’; stubbed long lateral N.; open crown.
153 Red oak 7 22 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 12’; poor pruning; pruned away from building;
asymmetric open crown E.
154 Red oak 11 35 Heritage 3 Low Multiple attachments at 12’; poor pruning; pruned away from building;
asymmetric crown E.
155 Red oak 12 38 Heritage 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 12’; poor pruning; pruned away from building;
asymmetric crown E.; poor structure;
vigorous.
156 Sweetgum 14 44 No 4 Moderate Slight lean S.; multiple attachments at 6’; good structure; vigorous; pruned
above parking lot; in 10’ x 13’ bulb out.
157 Callery pear 7 22 No 3 Moderate Codominant stems at 10’; narrow attachments; narrow crown; vigorous.
158 Callery pear 10 31 No 3 Low Multiple attachments at 6’; bows S.; asymmetric crown S.; poor pruning;
narrow attachments; narrow crown;
epicormics.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
159 Crape myrtle 10 31 No 4 Moderate 4’ from sidewalk, 5’ from building; multiple attachments at 6’; pruned away
from building; dense vigorous crown;
good structure.
160 Crape myrtle 8 25 No 3 Moderate 4’ from sidewalk, 5’ from building; multiple attachments at 5’; pruned away
from building; poor pruning; dense
crown.
161 Red oak 8 25 Heritage 3 Moderate Pruned away from building; asymmetric crown S.; poor structure; poor pruning.
162 Red oak 8 25 Heritage 3 Moderate Pruned away from building; asymmetric crown S.; poor structure; poor pruning.
163 Red oak 8 25 Heritage 3 Low Pruned away from building; asymmetric crown S.; leans S.; branch failure; poor
structure; poor pruning.
164 Red oak 7 22 Heritage 3 Low In landscape 4’ from walk and 5’ from building; multiple attachments at 8’;
wounds on trunk S. mostly healed,
lowest wound oozing smelly exudate;
open spreading crown; all leaves still
attached; poor pruning and structure.
165 London plane 7 22 No 4 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; codominant stems at 12’; asymmetric crown W.;
vigorous.
166 London plane 7 22 No 4 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; codominant stems at 12’; asymmetric crown W.;
vigorous.
167 London plane 8 25 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ landscaping island; heavy asymmetric crown W.; epicormics;
vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
168 London plane 6 19 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ landscaping island; poor structure; gaps thru crown; vigorous.
169 London plane 7 22 No 4 Moderate In 4x4’ landscaping island; slight corrected bow E.; crook at 20’; vigorous.
170 London plane 7 22 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ landscaping island; slight corrected bow E.; crook at 20’; dense
upper crown; gap thru middle crown;
vigorous.
171 London plane 8 25 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ landscaping island; high thin crown; crowded; vigorous.
172 Evergreen ash 9 28 No 3 Moderate In 9’ landscaping strip; sinuous stem; crook at 15’; crowded; asymmetric
crown N.; vigorous.
173 Evergreen ash 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate In 9’ landscaping strip; codominant stems at 6’; seam from attachment to
base; asymmetric crown S.; poor
structure.
174 Evergreen ash 11 35 No 3 Moderate In 11’ planter; multiple attachments at 7’; narrow upright crown; crowded;
asymmetric crown S.
175 Evergreen ash 11 35 No 3 Moderate In 11’ planter; codominant stems at 7’; open spreading; poor structure.
176 London plane 7 22 No 3 Low In 4x4’ island; leans E.; crowded; poor structure; vigorous.
177 London plane 11 35 No 4 Moderate In 4x4’ island; multiple attachments at 12’; narrow upright crown; good
structure; vigorous.
178 London plane 8 25 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; codominant stems at 15’; wide attachment; dense crown;
vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
179 London plane 13 41 No 4 Moderate In 9’ wide landscaping strip; large full crown; specimen tree; asymmetric
crown N.; good structure.
180 Purple Robe locust 11 35 No 1 Low In 7’ landscaping strip; all but dead. 181 Purple Robe locust 11 35 No 2 Low In 7’ landscaping strip; multiple attachments at 7’; narrow attachments;
narrow upright crown; extensive 1-4”
branch dieback.
182 London plane 8 25 No 4 Moderate In 4x4’ island; narrow vaselike crown; good structure; vigorous.
183 London plane 4 13 No 2 Low In 4x4’ island; bows S.; gap in crown; poor structure.
184 London plane 20 63 Heritage 4 High Multiple attachments at 6’; wide spreading crown; slight lean S.;
vigorous.
185 London plane 5 16 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; stem doglegs at 15’; funky structure.
186 London plane 6 19 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; bows S.; asymmetric crown S.; good structure.
187 London plane 6 19 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; leans S.; gaps thru crown; extensive epicormics.
188 London plane 5 16 No 2 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; codominant stems at 12’; leans S.; asymmetric
crown S.; poor pruning; gaps thru
crown; extensive epicormics.
189 London plane 6 19 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; bows S.; good structure; poor pruning.
190 London plane 7 22 No 4 Moderate In 4x4’ island; slight sweep S.; good structure; poor pruning; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
191 London plane 17 53 Heritage 4 Moderate In 7’ landscaping strip with grate cutout; corrected lean S.; codominant stems at
12’; wide spreading crown; gap in crown
E.; asymmetric crown W.; vigorous;
growing into charging station.
192 London plane 17 53 Heritage 3 Moderate In 7’ landscaping strip with grate cutout; corrected lean S.; codominant stems at
4’; measured below attachment; open
spreading crown.
193 London plane 7 22 No 3 Low In 7’ landscaping strip; heavy sweep S.; codominant stems at 12’; good
structure.
194 London plane 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; open upright crown; gaps thru crown; moderate vigor; poor
pruning.
195 London plane 17 53 Heritage 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 5’; robust crown; vigorous; poor pruning above parking
lot; in 15x25’ landscaping island.
196 London plane 9 28 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 12’; suppressed; asymmetric crown W.; in 15x25’
landscaping island.
197 London plane 12 38 No 3 Moderate In 7’ landscaping strip with grate cutout; codominant stems at 6’; asymmetric
crown E.; windswept E.; epicormics.
198 London plane 5 16 No 3 Low In 4x4’ island; suppressed; asymmetric crown S.; poor structure.
199 Purple Robe locust 9 28 No 2 Low Multiple attachments at 8’; in 7’ landscape island; suppressed; leans
W.; poor vigor.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
200 London plane 17 53 Heritage 4 High Multiple attachments at 6’; good structure; wide crown; bare lower crown.
201 Purple Robe locust 10 31 No 1 Low In 7’ landscaping strip; all but dead. 202 London plane 16 50 Heritage 4 High Multiple attachments at 8’; good structure; wide crown; bare lower crown.
203 London plane 10 31 No 3 Moderate In 7’ landscaping strip; leans S.; codominant stems at 6’; branch fused
btwn attachments at 8’; vigorous wide
crown.
204 London plane 6 19 No 3 Low In 7’ landscaping strip; leans S.; codominant stems at 12’; poor structure;
vigorous.
205 Purple Robe locust 10 31 No 1 Low In 9’ landscaping strip; all but dead. 206 London plane 11 35 No 3 Moderate In 9’ landscaping strip; high spreading crown; dense; poor structure; vigorous.
207 London plane 10 31 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; multiple attachments at 7’; leans S.; open
spreading crown.
208 London plane 6 19 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; leans S.; asymmetric crown W.
209 London plane 7 22 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; narrow upright crown; codominant stems at 15’; gaps
thru crown.
210 London plane 11 35 No 3 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; high wide crown; codominant stems at 8’; vigorous.
211 London plane 13 41 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; high wide crown; asymmetric crown S.; multiple
attachments at 6’; gaps thru crown.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
212 London plane 6 19 No 3 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; corrected lean S.; good structure; moderate vigor.
213 London plane 9 28 No 3 Low In 8’ landscaping strip; asymmetric crown W.; multiple attachments at 15’;
poor structure.
214 London plane 9 28 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; asymmetric crown N.; history of branch failure; gaps
tho crown; vigorous.
215 London plane 14 44 No 3 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; codominant stems at 8’; asymmetric crown W.;
vigorous.
216 London plane 7 22 No 3 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; leans S.; dense crown; poor structure; vigorous.
217 London plane 6 19 No 4 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; slight bow S.; dense crown; good structure; vigorous.
218 London plane 9 28 No 4 Moderate In 5’ landscaping strip; slight bow S.; dense crown; good structure; vigorous.
219 London plane 8 25 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; multiple attachments at 10’; leans S.; gaps thru
crown.
220 London plane 7 22 No 3 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; multiple attachments at 10’; leans S.; gaps thru
crown.
221 London plane 8 25 No 3 Low In 4x4’ island; upper stems bows S. and corrects; open crown; epicormics.
222 London plane 8 25 No 3 Moderate In 4x4’ island; bows S.; dense crown; vigorous.
223 Purple Robe locust 12 38 No 1 Low In 7’ landscape strip; all but dead.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
224 Monterey pine 30 94 Heritage 3 Low In 8’ sidewalk bulb out; topped and pruned away from power lines; poor
pruning; moderate vigor.
225 Coast redwood 20 63 Heritage 3 Moderate In 12’ landscaping strip; topped below power lines; vigorous.
226 Monterey pine 16 50 Heritage 2 Low Topped below power lines; extensive 1- 3” branch dieback; low vigor.
227 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate In 12’ landscaping strip; topped below power lines; vigorous.
228 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate In 12’ landscaping strip; topped below power lines; vigorous.
229 Coast redwood 22 69 Heritage 3 Moderate In 12’ landscaping strip; topped below power lines; vigorous.
230 Coast redwood 7 22 Heritage 4 Moderate In 12’ landscaping strip; big sweep S.; growing into chain link; vigorous.
231 Southern live oak 19 60 Heritage 3 Low In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines; poor
structure; vigorous.
232 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines;
crowded; vigorous.
233 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines;
vigorous.
234 Coast redwood 21 66 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines;
vigorous.
235 Canary Island pine 17 53 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines; dense
crown; poor structure; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
236 Canary Island pine 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines; dense
crown; poor structure; vigorous.
237 Southern live oak 17 53 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; low spreading crown; wound on
trunk E.
238 Canary Island pine 20 63 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines; dense
crown; poor structure; vigorous.
239 Canary Island pine 22 69 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines; dense
crown; poor structure; vigorous.
240 Coast redwood 20 63 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines; pruned
away from power pole; crowded;
vigorous.
241 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines;
vigorous.
242 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines;
vigorous.
243 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6’ landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; topped below power lines;
vigorous.
244 Coast redwood 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate In landscaping strip; 2’ from border wall; crowded; topped below power lines;
vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
245 London plane 12 38 No 3 Low 2’ from edge of 10’ landscaping strip; crowded; pruned away from power lines;
asymmetric crown N.; vigorous.
246 Red oak 11 35 Heritage 3 Low Multiple attachments at 10’; topped below power lines; in 6’ landscape strip
3’ from border wall.
247 Red oak 10 31 Heritage 3 Low Multiple attachments at 10’; topped below power lines; in 6’ landscape strip
3’ from border wall.
248 Blackwood acacia 11 35 No 2 Low Multiple attachments at 7’; in 6’ landscape strip 2’ from border wall;
terrible structure; topped below power
lines.
249 Blackwood acacia 9 28 No 2 Low Multiple attachments at 7’; in landscaping 2’ from border wall; terrible
structure; topped below power lines.
250 London plane 10 31 No 3 Low In landscaping 5’ from curbs; poor structure; poor pruning; vigorous.
251 London plane 13 41 No 3 Moderate In 9’ landscape strip; multiple attachments at 10’; narrow upright
crown; crowded; poor pruning.
252 Coast redwood 26 82 Heritage 4 Moderate In 5’ parkway strip; root flare pillowing over curb; Typical form and structure;
pruned away from power lines E.;
vigorous.
253 Coast redwood 24 75 Heritage 4 Moderate In 5’ parkway strip; root flare roots disrupting sidewalk; pruned away from
power lines E.; Typical form and
structure; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
254 London plane 15 47 No 4 Moderate In 12x12’ landscape bulb out; multiple attachments at 8’; good structure;
vigorous.
255 London plane 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate In 12x12’ landscape bulb out; codominant stems at 8’; leans S.;
asymmetric crown S.; crowded;
vigorous.
256 Blackwood acacia 18 57 Heritage 2 Low In 5’ parkway strip; leans S.; roots cuts for irrigation; crowded; poor structure.
257 Blackwood acacia 16 50 Heritage 3 Low In 5’ parkway strip; roots cuts for sidewalk; crowded; vigorous; poor
structure.
258 London plane 14 44 No 3 Moderate In 10’ wide landscape bulb out; multiple attachments at 8’; corrected lean S.;
crowded.
259 London plane 15 47 No 3 Moderate In 10’ wide landscape bulb out; codominant stems at 12’’; corrected
lean S.; crowded.
260 Blackwood acacia 17 53 Heritage 2 Low Multiple attachments at 15’; leans S.; crook at 20’; seam between
attachments at 20’; asymmetric crown
W.; just awful.
261 London plane 17 53 Heritage 4 Moderate In 10’ wide landscape bulb out; multiple attachments at 8’; asymmetric crown S.;
open spreading crown; vigorous.
262 London plane 12 38 No 3 Moderate In 10’ wide landscape bulb out; codominant stems at 6’; high crown;
sparse branch structure.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
263 Blackwood acacia 18 57 Heritage 2 Low In 5’ parkway strip; crowded; vigorous; high narrow crown; pruned away from
power lines; poor structure.
264 London plane 15 47 No 3 Moderate 1’ from edge of 9’ wide landscape bulb out; multiple attachments at 8’; crowded;
asymmetric crown W.
265 Purple Robe locust 9 28 No 2 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; narrow upright crown; poor structure; decay at base
and in stems.
266 Purple Robe locust 9 28 No 2 Low In 5’ landscaping strip; narrow upright crown; poor structure; poor pruning;
borers in main stem; extensive dead
wood; 4’ wound on trunk N.
267 London plane 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate In 6x6’ grate in landscape bulb out; base impacting grate; crowded; asymmetric
crown S.
268 London plane 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate 1’ from edge of landscape bulb out; multiple attachments at 5’; base
impacting crowded; asymmetric crown
N.
269 Purple Robe locust 6 19 No 1 Low All but dead.
270 Purple Robe locust 11 35 No 1 Low All but dead; in 5’ parkway strip. 271 Canary Island pine 18 57 Heritage 4 High Typical form and structure; good structure and color; crowded.
272 Canary Island pine 15 47 No 2 Low Sinuous single stem; leans W.; multiple crooks; poor structure; oozing sap on
trunk.
273 Canary Island pine 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate In 5’ parkway strip; sweeps S.; high crown; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
274 London plane 15 47 No 3 Moderate In 5’ landscape strip; leans S.; multiple attachments at 6’; vigorous.
275 London plane 14 44 No 3 Low In grate in 6’ landscape strip; crowded; poor structure; open crown.
276 London plane 13 41 No 3 Moderate In grate in 5’ landscape strip; good structure; poor pruning; open crown.
277 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 4 Moderate In 5’ wide parkway strip; crowded; gaps in crown; excellent color and vigor.
278 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 4 Moderate In 5’ wide parkway strip; crowded; excellent color and vigor.
279 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 3 Moderate In 5’ wide parkway strip; crowded; gaps in crown; history of branch failure.
280 London plane 12 38 No 3 Low In 5’ bulb out; leans S.; multiple attachments at 5’; history of branch
failure.
281 London plane 11 35 No 3 Low In landscaping; leans S.; multiple attachments at 10’; crowded; good
structure.
282 Blackwood acacia 15 47 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 10’; 1’ from sidewalk; open spreading crown;
vigorous.
283 Blackwood acacia 4,3 22 No 3 Low Codominant stems at base; stump sprout; crowded; vigorous young tree.
284 Chinese elm 11,8 60 Heritage 3 Low Off-site; tagged. Overhangs edge of curb 13’; terrible structure; codominant
at base; awful pruning above parking
and below power lines.
285 Coast redwood 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate 5’ from curb in landscape; topped below power lines; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
286 Coast redwood 17 53 Heritage 3 Moderate 5’ from curb in landscape; topped below power lines; vigorous.
287 Coast redwood 15 47 Heritage 3 Moderate 5’ from curb in landscape; topped below power lines; moderate vigor.
288 Canary Island pine 16 50 Heritage 3 Low 5’ from curb in landscape; topped below power lines; moderate vigor; poor
structure.
289 Canary Island pine 14 44 No 3 Low 5’ from curb in landscape; topped below power lines; moderate vigor; poor
structure.
290 London plane 11 35 No 3 Moderate In 10’ bulb out; crowded; asymmetric crown S.; vigorous.
291 Coast redwood 16 50 Heritage 3 Moderate 4’ from curb in landscape; topped below power lines; moderate vigor.
292 Coast redwood 15 47 Heritage 3 Moderate 4’ from curb in landscape; crowded; topped below power lines; moderate
vigor.
293 Coast redwood 16 50 Heritage 3 Low 4’ from curb in landscape; crowded; gaps in crown; topped below power
lines; moderate vigor.
294 Chinese elm 13,5 57 Heritage 3 Moderate Off-site; tagged. Overhangs edge of curb 11’; codominant at base; crowded;
history of branch failure; dense crown;
epicormics.
295 Coast redwood 15 47 Heritage 3 Low 4’ from curb in landscape; crowded; topped below power lines; moderate
vigor.
296 Coast redwood 18 57 Heritage 3 Low 4’ from curb in landscape; crowded; topped below power lines; moderate
vigor.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
297 Southern live oak 11 35 Heritage 3 Low 4’ from edge of curb, 5’ from sidewalk; leans S.; pruned hard away from utility
lines; one-sided crown S.; dense crown;
poor structure.
298 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Low 3’ from curb in landscape; crowded; topped below power lines; moderate
vigor.
299 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Moderate 3’ from curb in landscape; crowded; topped below power lines; vigorous.
300 London plane 10 31 No 3 Low 4’ from curb in landscape; multiple attachments at 12’; pruned away from
power lines; asymmetric S.; poor
structure.
301 London plane 13 41 No 3 Low In landscape 4’ from curb; multiple attachments at 12’; pruned away from
power lines; crowded; leans S.;
asymmetric S.; poor structure.
302 Southern live oak 12 38 Heritage 2 Low Multiple attachments S. at 12’; one- sided crown S.; pruned away from
power lines; poor structure.
303 Carolina laurel
cherry
6 19 No 2 Low Volunteer; crowded; leans S.;
suppressed; crowded; poor structure;
vigorous.
304 London plane 6 19 Street 2 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; codominant stems at 8’; pruned below
utility lines; asymmetric crown W. over
street; square root flare from previous
basin.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
305 London plane 9 28 Street 3 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; leans S; asymmetric crown W. over street;
partially pruned below utility lines;
square root flare from previous basin;
vigorous.
306 London plane 7 22 Street 3 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; codominant stems at 9’; leans S;
asymmetric crown W. over street;
branches impact utility lines; square root
flare from previous basin; vigorous.
307 London plane 7 22 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; leans S; asymmetric crown W. over
street; branches impact utility lines;
square root flare from previous basin;
vigorous.
308 London plane 8 25 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; leans E.; asymmetric crown W. over
street; branches impact utility lines;
square root flare from previous basin;
vigorous.
309 London plane 10 31 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; codominant stems at 7’; heavy lean S.;
branches impact utility lines; square root
flare from previous basin; vigorous.
310 London plane 10 31 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; leans W.; asymmetric crown W. over
street; branches impact utility lines;
square root flare from previous basin;
vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
311 London plane 10 31 Street 3 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; leans S.; asymmetric crown W. over
street; branches impact utility lines;
square root flare from previous basin;
sparse crown.
312 London plane 10 31 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; leans W.; asymmetric crown W. over
street; branches impact utility lines and
power pole; square root flare from
previous basin; vigorous.
313 London plane 9 28 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; codominant stems at 10’; leans W.;
asymmetric crown W. over street;
branches impact utility lines; square root
flare from previous basin; vigorous.
314 London plane 9 28 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; codominant stems at 10’; leans S.;
asymmetric crown W. over street;
branches impact utility lines; square root
flare from previous basin; vigorous.
315 London plane 10 31 Street 3 Moderate Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; crowded; asymmetric crown W. over street;
branches impact utility lines; square root
flare from previous basin; vigorous.
316 London plane 8 25 Street 3 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; poor structure; moderate 1-2” branch
dieback; branches impact utility lines;
square root flare from previous basin;
sparse.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
317 London plane 8 25 Street 3 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; poor structure; asymmetric crown W. over
street; branches impact utility lines;
square root flare from previous basin;
sparse.
318 London plane 6 19 Street 2 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; leans S.; asymmetric crown W. over street;
suppressed; base outside dripline; base
undermined N.; square root flare from
previous basin; sparse.
319 London plane 5 16 Street 3 Low Street tree in 6’ parkway strip; leans S.; asymmetric crown W. over street;
suppressed; base undermined S.;
square root flare from previous basin;
vigorous.
320 Blackwood acacia 14 44 No 2 Low In 4’ planting strip btwn sidewalk and 1’ retaining wall; crowded; leans E.;
moderate 1-3” branch dieback.
321 Blackwood acacia 13 41 No 1 Low In 4’ planting strip btwn sidewalk and 1’ retaining wall; crowded; leans N.;
extensive 1-3” branch dieback.
322 Blackwood acacia 16 50 Heritage 3 Low In 4’ planting strip btwn sidewalk and 1’ retaining wall; large tear out on central
stem above attachment; narrow crown.
323 Canary Island pine 14 44 No 2 Low 3’ from sidewalk; topped at 20’; below high volts; one-sided S.
324 Canary Island pine 18 57 Heritage 3 Low 3’ from sidewalk; topped at 20’; below high volts; one-sided E.; vigorous.
325 Canary Island pine 14 44 No 3 Moderate 3’ from sidewalk; pruned away from below high volts; crowded; vigorous.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
515 - 525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
326 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Low 3’ from sidewalk; topped at 20’; below high volts; gaps thru crown.
327 Coast redwood 19 60 Heritage 3 Low 3’ from sidewalk; topped at 20’; below high volts; gaps thru crown.
328 Coast redwood 15 47 Heritage 3 Low 3’ from sidewalk; topped at 20’; below high volts; gaps thru crown; base
covered by ivy..
329 Canary Island pine 15 47 No 3 Moderate 3’ from sidewalk; pruned away from below high volts; one-sided W.;
vigorous.
330 Coast redwood 15 47 Heritage 3 Low 3’ from sidewalk; topped at 20’; below high volts; pruned away from utilities;
gaps thru crown.
331 Coast redwood 17 53 Heritage 3 Low 6” from sidewalk; topped at 20’; below high volts; pruned away from utilities;
gaps thru crown.
332 Blackwood acacia 7 22 No 2 Low 4’ from sidewalk; sinuous stem; narrow crown; grows btwn utilities and guy line.
333 Blackwood acacia 17 53 Heritage 2 Low 1’ from sidewalks; corrected lean S.; crowded; codominant w decay in
attachment at 15’; poor structure;
damage at base N.
334 Blackwood acacia 12 38 No 1 Low 1’ from sidewalk; codominant at 5’; grows into chain link fence; sweeps E.;
large crack in E. stem from attachment
to elbow.
335 Blackwood acacia 20 63 Heritage 2 Low 1’ from sidewalk; codominant with included bark at 6’; grows into chain link
fence; corrected lean S.; engulfed by
vine; one-sided S.

Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
1 Eastern redbud 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 2 Coast redwood 21 66 Remove Within development footprint 3 Coast redwood 25 79 Remove Within development footprint 4 Coast redwood 21 66 Remove Within development footprint 5 Coast redwood 28 88 Remove Within development footprint 6 Coast redwood 24 75 Remove Within development footprint 7 Coast redwood 26 82 Remove Within development footprint 8 Coast redwood 25 79 Remove Within development footprint 9 Southern live oak 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 10 Southern magnolia 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 11 Southern magnolia 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 12 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 13 Coast redwood 29 91 Remove Within development footprint 14 Silver dollar gum 38 119 Remove Within development footprint 15 Chinese elm 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 16 Chinese elm 16 50 Preserve Outside development envelope 17 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 18 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 19 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 20 Southern magnolia 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 21 Southern magnolia 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 22 Southern magnolia 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 23 Southern magnolia 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 24 Glossy privet 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 25 Southern live oak 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 26 Coast live oak 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 27 Coast redwood 21 66 Remove Within development footprint 28 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 29 Coast redwood 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 30 Canary Island pine 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 31 Canary Island pine 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 32 Evergreen ash 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 33 Coast live oak 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 34 Southern live oak 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 35 Coast redwood 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 36 Southern live oak 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 37 Southern live oak 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 38 Southern live oak 12 38 Remove Within development footprint Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
39 Coast redwood 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 40 Coast redwood 21 66 Remove Within development footprint 41 Callery pear 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 42 Callery pear 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 43 Callery pear 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 44 Evergreen ash 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 45 Evergreen ash 22 69 Remove Within development footprint 46 Evergreen ash 21 66 Remove Within development footprint 47 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 48 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 49 Red oak 14 44 Remove Within development footprint
50 Red oak 12 38 Remove Within development footprint
51 Red oak 13 41 Remove Within development footprint
52 London plane 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 53 London plane 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 54 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 55 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 56 Red oak 13 41 Remove Within development footprint
57 London plane 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 58 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 59 London plane 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 60 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 61 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 62 London plane 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 63 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 64 Coast redwood 35 110 Remove Within development footprint 65 Coast redwood 35 110 Remove Within development footprint 66 Coast redwood 31 97 Remove Within development footprint 67 Coast redwood 23 72 Remove Within development footprint 68 Sweetgum 19 60 Remove Within development footprint
69 Sweetgum 19 60 Remove Within development footprint
70 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 71 Marina madrone 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 72 Marina madrone 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 73 Coast redwood 28 88 Remove Within development footprint 74 Coast redwood 32 100 Remove Within development footprint 75 Coast redwood 32 100 Remove Within development footprint 76 Canary Island pine 14 44 Remove Within development footprint Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
77 Coast redwood 29 91 Remove Within development footprint 78 Coast redwood 25 79 Remove Within development footprint 79 Coast redwood 26 82 Remove Within development footprint 80 Canary Island pine 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 81 Canary Island pine 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 82 Southern magnolia 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 83 Southern magnolia 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 84 Silver dollar gum 36 113 Remove Within development footprint 85 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 86 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 87 Canary Island pine 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 88 Canary Island pine 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 89 Evergreen ash 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 90 Canary Island pine 20 63 Remove Within development footprint 91 Coast redwood 30 94 Remove Within development footprint 92 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 93 Canary Island pine 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 94 Canary Island pine 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 95 Canary Island pine 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 96 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 97 Evergreen ash 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 98 Evergreen ash 22 69 Remove Within development footprint 99 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 100 Evergreen ash 21 66 Remove Within development footprint 101 Evergreen ash 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 102 Evergreen ash 24 75 Remove Within development footprint 103 Callery pear 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 104 Callery pear 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 105 Callery pear 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 106 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 107 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 108 Callery pear 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 109 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 110 London plane 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 111 Olive 5,4,4,3 51 Remove Within development footprint 112 Olive 5,4,3,3,3 56 Remove Within development footprint 113 Olive 5,4,4,3 51 Remove Within development footprint 114 Canary Island pine 23 72 Remove Within development footprint Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
115 Red oak 8 25 Remove Within development footprint
116 Red oak 6 19 Remove Within development footprint
117 Red oak 9 28 Remove Within development footprint
118 Red oak 9 28 Remove Within development footprint
119 Red oak 11 35 Remove Within development footprint
120 Callery pear 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 121 Callery pear 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 122 Callery pear 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 123 Callery pear 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 124 Callery pear 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 125 Japanese maple 4,4,4 38 Remove Within development footprint 126 Japanese maple 5,4 28 Remove Within development footprint 127 Japanese maple 5,5,4 44 Remove Within development footprint 128 Japanese maple 5,4,4 41 Remove Within development footprint 129 Japanese maple 5,5,5 47 Remove Within development footprint 130 Japanese maple 5,5 31 Remove Within development footprint 131 Evergreen ash 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 132 Evergreen ash 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 133 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 134 London plane 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 135 London plane 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 136 London plane 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 137 London plane 4 13 Remove Within development footprint 138 Evergreen ash 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 139 Evergreen ash 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 140 Evergreen ash 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 141 Evergreen ash 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 142 London plane 4 13 Remove Within development footprint 143 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 144 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 145 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 146 London plane 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 147 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 148 Purple robe locust 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 149 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 150 Canary Island pine 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 151 Red oak 7 22 Remove Within development footprint
152 Red oak 9 28 Remove Within development footprint
Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
153 Red oak 7 22 Remove Within development footprint
154 Red oak 11 35 Remove Within development footprint
155 Red oak 12 38 Remove Within development footprint
156 Sweetgum 14 44 Remove Within development footprint
157 Callery pear 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 158 Callery pear 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 159 Crape myrtle 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 160 Crape myrtle 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 161 Red oak 8 25 Remove Within development footprint
162 Red oak 8 25 Remove Within development footprint
163 Red oak 8 25 Remove Within development footprint
164 Red oak 7 22 Remove Within development footprint
165 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 166 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 167 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 168 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 169 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 170 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 171 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 172 Evergreen ash 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 173 Evergreen ash 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 174 Evergreen ash 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 175 Evergreen ash 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 176 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 177 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 178 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 179 London plane 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 180 Purple robe locust 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 181 Purple robe locust 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 182 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 183 London plane 4 13 Remove Within development footprint 184 London plane 20 63 Remove Within development footprint 185 London plane 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 186 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 187 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 188 London plane 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 189 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 190 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
191 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 192 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 193 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 194 London plane 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 195 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 196 London plane 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 197 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 198 London plane 5 16 Remove Within development footprint 199 Purple robe locust 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 200 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 201 Purple robe locust 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 202 London plane 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 203 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 204 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 205 Purple robe locust 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 206 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 207 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 208 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 209 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 210 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 211 London plane 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 212 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 213 London plane 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 214 London plane 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 215 London plane 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 216 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 217 London plane 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 218 London plane 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 219 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 220 London plane 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 221 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 222 London plane 8 25 Remove Within development footprint 223 Purple robe locust 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 224 Monterey pine 30 94 Remove Within development footprint 225 Coast redwood 20 63 Remove Within development footprint 226 Monterey pine 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 227 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 228 Coast redwood 19 60 Remove Within development footprint Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
229 Coast redwood 22 69 Remove Within development footprint 230 Coast redwood 7 22 Remove Within development footprint 231 Southern live oak 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 232 Coast redwood 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 233 Coast redwood 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 234 Coast redwood 21 66 Remove Within development footprint 235 Canary Island pine 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 236 Canary Island pine 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 237 Southern live oak 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 238 Canary Island pine 20 63 Remove Within development footprint 239 Canary Island pine 22 69 Remove Within development footprint 240 Coast redwood 20 63 Remove Within development footprint 241 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 242 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 243 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 244 Coast redwood 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 245 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 246 Red oak 11 35 Remove Within development footprint
247 Red oak 10 31 Remove Within development footprint
248 Blackwood acacia 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 249 Blackwood acacia 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 250 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 251 London plane 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 252 Coast redwood 26 82 Remove Within development footprint 253 Coast redwood 24 75 Remove Within development footprint 254 London plane 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 255 London plane 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 256 Blackwood acacia 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 257 Blackwood acacia 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 258 London plane 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 259 London plane 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 260 Blackwood acacia 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 261 London plane 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 262 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 263 Blackwood acacia 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 264 London plane 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 265 Purple robe locust 9 28 Remove Within development footprint 266 Purple robe locust 9 28 Remove Within development footprint Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
267 London plane 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 268 London plane 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 269 Purple robe locust 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 270 Purple robe locust 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 271 Canary Island pine 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 272 Canary Island pine 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 273 Canary Island pine 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 274 London plane 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 275 London plane 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 276 London plane 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 277 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 278 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 279 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 280 London plane 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 281 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 282 Blackwood acacia 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 283 Blackwood acacia 4,3 22 Remove Within development footprint 284 Chinese elm 11,8 60 Preserve Outside development envelope 285 Coast redwood 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 286 Coast redwood 17 53 Remove Within development footprint 287 Coast redwood 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 288 Canary Island pine 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 289 Canary Island pine 14 44 Remove Within development footprint 290 London plane 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 291 Coast redwood 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 292 Coast redwood 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 293 Coast redwood 16 50 Remove Within development footprint 294 Chinese elm 13,5 57 Preserve Outside development envelope 295 Coast redwood 15 47 Remove Within development footprint 296 Coast redwood 18 57 Remove Within development footprint 297 Southern live oak 11 35 Remove Within development footprint 298 Coast redwood 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 299 Coast redwood 19 60 Remove Within development footprint 300 London plane 10 31 Remove Within development footprint 301 London plane 13 41 Remove Within development footprint 302 Southern live oak 12 38 Remove Within development footprint 303 Carolina laurel cherry 6 19 Remove Within development footprint 304 London plane 6 19 Remove Within parkway strip realignment Tree
No.

Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Circumference
(in.)
Disposition Comments
Tree Disposition
515-525 N. Whisman RoadMountain View, CAJanuary 2026
305 London plane 9 28 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 306 London plane 7 22 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 307 London plane 7 22 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 308 London plane 8 25 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 309 London plane 10 31 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 310 London plane 10 31 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 311 London plane 10 31 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 312 London plane 10 31 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 313 London plane 9 28 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 314 London plane 9 28 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 315 London plane 10 31 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 316 London plane 8 25 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 317 London plane 8 25 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 318 London plane 6 19 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 319 London plane 5 16 Remove Within parkway strip realignment 320 Blackwood acacia 14 44 Preserve Outside development envelope 321 Blackwood acacia 13 41 Preserve Outside development envelope 322 Blackwood acacia 16 50 Preserve Outside development envelope 323 Canary Island pine 14 44 Preserve Outside development envelope 324 Canary Island pine 18 57 Preserve Outside development envelope 325 Canary Island pine 14 44 Preserve Outside development envelope 326 Coast redwood 19 60 Preserve Outside development envelope 327 Coast redwood 19 60 Preserve Outside development envelope 328 Coast redwood 15 47 Preserve Outside development envelope 329 Canary Island pine 15 47 Preserve Outside development envelope 330 Coast redwood 15 47 Preserve Outside development envelope 331 Coast redwood 17 53 Preserve Outside development envelope 332 Blackwood acacia 7 22 Preserve Outside development envelope 333 Blackwood acacia 17 53 Preserve Outside development envelope 334 Blackwood acacia 12 38 Preserve Outside development envelope 335 Blackwood acacia 20 63 Preserve Outside development envelope