Mountain View City Council
March 24, 2026

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 2550 Ninth Street Suite 112, Berkeley, CA, 94710, 925.484.0211 ● www.hortscience.com Preliminary Arborist Report
555 West Middlefield Road
Mountain View, CA

PREPARED FOR
AvalonBay Communities
455 Market Street, Suite 1650
San Francisco, CA 94105
PREPARED BY:

HortScience | Bartlett Consulting
2550 Ninth Street Suite 112
Berkeley, CA, 94710
October 14, 2016
Updated June 7, 2018
Updated February 28, 2019
Updated October 1, 2021
Updated March 28, 2025
Updated June 4, 2025
Attachment 7

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company 2550 Ninth Street Suite 112, Berkeley, CA, 94710, 925.484.0211 ● www.hortscience.com Preliminary Arborist Report
555 West Middlefield Rd.

Mountain View, CA

Table of Contents

Page

Introduction and Overview 1

Tree Assessment Methods 1

Description of Trees 2

Heritage trees 4

Suitability for Preservation 5

Preliminary Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations 6

Preliminary Tree Preservation Guidelines 8

List of Tables

Table 1. Tree Condition and Frequency of Occurrence. 2 Table 2. Tree Suitability for Preservation. 6
Table 3. Tree Disposition Totals. 7

Exhibits

Tree Assessment Plan
Tree Assessment

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Preliminary Arborist Report
555 West Middlefield Rd.

Mountain View, CA
Introduction and Overview
AvalonBay Communities is planning to redevelop the site at 555 West Middlefield Rd. in Mountain View, CA. HortScience | Bartlett Consulting, Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. (H | BC) has prepared several iterations of arborist reports for this site beginning in 2016 and was asked to prepare a Preliminary Arborist Report for the site as part of the submittal to the City of Mountain View. The site currently consists of apartment buildings, with recreational facilities, associated parking and landscaping.

This report provides the following information:

1. An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees within the propose d pr
oject area based on a visual inspection from the ground.

2. A preliminary assessment of trees that will be preserved and removed based on AvalonBay Communities’ preliminary plans.

3. Preliminary guidelines for tree preservation during the design, construction, and mai
ntenance phases of development.

Tree Assessment Methods
Trees were originally assessed in November of 2012 and conditions were updated on June 29- 30, 2016. Trees were added to the scope February 26, 2019 and October 2024. The assessment included all trees 4” and greater located within the proposed project area and trees with branches that extended into the project area. The assessment procedure consisted of the following steps:

1. Identifying the tree species;

2. Tagging each tree with a numerically coded metal tag and recording its location on a map;

3. Meas
uring the trunk diameter at a point 54” above grade;

4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 to 5:
5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species.
4 - Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected.
3 - Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated with regular care.
2 - Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. 1 - Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated.

5. Rating the su itability for preservation as “high”, “moderate” or “low”. Suitability for preservation considers the health, age, and structural condition of the tree species and its potential to remain an asset to the site.

High: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the potential for longevity at the site.

Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects than can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more intense management and monitoring, and may have shorter life span than those in ‘high’ category.

Low: Trees in poor health or with significant structural defects that cannot be mitigated. Tree is expected to continue to decline, regardless of treatment. The species or individual tree may have characteristics that are undesirable for landscapes, and generally are unsuited for use areas.

Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company D
escription of Trees
HortScience | Bartlett Consulting evaluated 442 trees, representing 19 different species (Table 1, next page), including 10 street trees and 14 off-site trees whose branches extended over the site.

Overall, the trees at the site were in good (38%), fair (43%), and poor (19%) condition. Tree species selection was typical of those found in Bay Area landscapes. The landscape was mostly mature and had been well-maintained. Descriptions of each tree are found in the Tree Assessment and approximate locations are plotted on the Tree Assessment Plan (see Exhibits).

Ta
ble 1. Condition ratings and frequency of occurrence of trees 555 West Middlefield Rd., Mountain View, CA
Common Name Scientific Name Condition Total
Removed Poor
(1-2)
Fair
(3)
Good
(4-5)
African fern-pine Afrocarpus falcatus - - 1 1 2
Bronze loquat Eriobotrya deflexa - 4 66 12 82
Blue gum Eucalyptus globulus - 4 1 - 5
Silver dollar gum Eucalyptus polyanthemos - - 1 2 3
Red ironbark Eucalyptus sideroxylon - 9 19 - 28
English holly Ilex aquifolium - - 2 1 3
Glossy privet Ligustrum lucidum - 6 3 - 9
Southern magnolia Magnolia grandiflora - - 8 19 27
Olive Olea europaea - 8 37 86 131
Aleppo pine Pinus halepensis - 6 1 - 7
Monterey pine Pinus radiata - 2 1 - 3
Victorian box Pittosporum undulatum - 12 9 - 21
Carolina cherry laurel Prunus caroliniana - 6 3 - 9
Coast live oak Quercus agrifolia - 1 7 1 9
Holly oak Quercus ilex - - 3 1 4
Pepper tree Schinus molle - 2 3 - 5
Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia - 24 9 - 33
Coast redwood Sequoia sempervirens - 2 15 43 60
Windmill palm Trachycarpus fortunei - - - 1 1
Removed 22 - - - -
Total - 86 189 167 442
Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company The most frequently occurring species was olive, with 131 trees (30% of the population). Trees were mature. All had multiple trunks and almost all had been previously topped. Most trees were in good condition (86 trees). The olive’s had full or slightly thin crowns and minor trunk wounds, which is typical for mature olives (Photo 1). Trees in fair condition (37 trees) had thinning crowns and more significant defects, such as decay in one stem or trunk sunburn. Trees in poor condition (eight trees) had very thin crowns and dieback (Photo 2).

T
he second most commons species was bronze loquat with 82 trees (18%). Trees were mostly in fair condition (66 trees) with multiple or codominant trunks and fair form and structure. Four trees in poor condition had a small crown, poor structure, and/or dieback. Trees in good condition (1 2 trees) had dense crowns and good form. Most trees were growing against buildings and had been previously topped or pruned for building clearance.

S
ixty (60) coast redwoods were evaluated (13%).

Redwoods were concentrated along the Moffett Blvd.
frontage, on the slope between the site and Middlefield Rd., and in the center of the site around the pools. Trees were young to mature, with trunk diameters ranging
from seven to 54 inches, and an average diameter of 29
inches. Most redwoods (43 trees) were in good
condition with good form and structure and dense or
slightly thin crowns (Photo 3). Trees in fair condition (15 trees) had fair form, thinning crowns, and several had
trunk leans. Two trees in poor condition had
thin crowns and
suppressed form.

Many trees grew
in groups and, as
a result, had
asymmetrical
crowns.

Photo 1 (far
left):

Olive #318 had
been previously
topped at 15’,
but had a full,
dense crown
and was in good
condition.

P
hoto 2 (left):

Tree #319 was
in poor condition
with very little
live foliage.

Photo 3: A group of three coast
redwoods (#178-180) was located
in a planter near the center of the
site. Tree # 179 (left) was in fair
condition with corrected trunk lean
and thin crown, while trees #178
and 180 were in good condition
with dense crowns.

Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Thirty-three (33) Brazilian pepper trees (7%) were located at the east end of the site on a bank adjacent to the sound wall. Trees were crowded and had not been maintained, and most had poor form and structure. Nine trees were in fair condition and 24 trees were in poor condition.

T
wenty-eight (28) red ironbarks (6%) were evaluated at the site. Most trees had been previously topped at 30-35 feet. Trees in fair condition (19 trees) had regrown reasonable crowns, but generally had poor form and structure. Trees in poor condition (8 trees) had small, thin crowns.

None of the trees were in good condition.

S
outhern magnolias made up 6% of the population
with 27 trees. Magnolias were in good (19 trees) and
fair condition (eight trees). Trees in good condition
had good form and structure and slightly thin crowns
(Photo 4). Trees in fair condition had a thinning crown and/or poor color.

T
wenty-one (21) Victorian box were evaluated. Trees
were in either in fair (9 trees) or poor (12 trees)
condition. Those in fair condition were suppressed or
crowded. Trees in poor condition had more significant
defects such as poor form and structure, decay, and
dieback.

T
he remaining species were represented by 9 or
fewer trees and included the following:
• Nine glossy privets in fair (3 trees) and poor (6
t
rees) condition;
• Nine coast live oaks good (tree #403), fair (7
t
rees), and poor (tree #280) condition;
• Nine Carolina cherry laurel in fair (3 trees), and poor (6 trees) condition; • Seven Aleppo pine in fair (tree #392) and poor (6 trees) condition; • Five blue gums growing in the median at the end of Cypress Point in fair (tree #416) and poor
(4 trees) condition;
• Five pepper trees in fair (3 trees) and poor (2 trees) condition; • Four holly oaks in good (tree #359) and fair (3 trees) condition; • Three silver dollar gums in good (2 trees) and fair (tree #342) condition; • Three English holly in good (tree #352) and fair (2 trees) condition; • Three Monterey pine in fair (tree #98) and poor (2 trees) condition; • Two African fern-pines in good and fair condition;
• One windmill palm in good condition.

H
eritage Trees
The City of Mountain View defines a Heritage tree as any tree 48 inches and greater in trunk circumference (15 inches or larger in diameter) and oaks, cedars, and sequoias 12 inches and greater in trunk circumference (4 inches or larger in diameter). Three hundred thirty-three (333) trees qualified as Heritage. Heritage status of individual trees is identified in the Tree Assessment (see Exhibits).

Photo 4: Southern magnolia #174
was in good condition with good
form and structure.

Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Suitability for Preservation
Before evaluating the impacts that will occur during development, it is important to consider the quality of the tree resource itself, and the potential for individual trees that are preserved on development sites must be carefully selected to make sure that they may survive development impacts, adapt to a new environment, and perform well in the landscape.

E
ach tree was rated for suitability for preservation based upon its age, health, structural condition, and ability to safely coexist within a development environment (see Tree Assessment in Exhibits, and Table 2). We consider trees with high suitability for preservation to be the best candidates for preservation. We do not recommend retention of trees with low suitability for preservation in areas where people or property will be present. Retention of trees with moderate suitability for preservation depends upon the intensity of proposed site changes. Off-site and street trees were not rated.
 Tree health
Healthy, vigorous trees are better able to tolerate impacts such as root injury, demolition of
existing structures, changes in soil grade and moisture, and soil compaction than are non
-vigorous trees.
 Structural integrity
Trees with significant amounts of wood decay and other structural defects that cannot be corrected are likely to fail. Such trees should not be preserved in areas where damage t o
peop
le or property is likely. For example, red ironbarks and silver dollar gums that had been
topped have a high likelihood of branch failure.
 Species response
There is a wide variation in the response of individual species to construction impacts and changes in the environment. For instance, coast redwood and coast live oak are relatively tolerant of construction impacts compared to Monterey pine, which is ver y
s
ensitive to root damage.
 Tree age and longevity
Old trees, while having significant emotional and aesthetic appeal, have limit ed
phy
siological capacity to adjust to an altered environment. Young trees are better able t o gener
ate new tissue and respond to change.
 Species invasiveness
Species that spread across a site and displace desired vegetation are not alwa ys
appr
opriate for retention. This is particularly true when indigenous species are displaced.

The California Invasive Plant Inventory Database (http://www.cal-ipc.org/paf/) lists species identified as being invasive. Mountain View is part of the Central West Floristic Province. Brazilian pepper, and olive are listed as “limited.” Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company T
able 2. Tree suitability for preservation
555 West Middlefield Rd., Mountain View, CA
H
igh Trees in this category had good health and structural stability that have the potential for longevity at the site. Ninety-three (93) trees had high suitability for preservation: 51 olives, 24 coast redwood, 15 southern magnolias, bronze loquat #146, English holly #352, and windmill palm #7.

Mo
derate Trees in this category have fair health and/or structural defects that may be abated with treatment. Trees in this category require more intense management and monitoring and may have shorter lifespans than those in the “high” category. One hundred eighty-four trees (184) had moderate suitability for preservation: 63 olives, 61 bronze loquats, 30 coast redwoods, 11 southern magnolias; Victorian boxes #30, 97, 102, and 106; glossy privets #279, 281, and 283; Brazilian peppers #269 and 278; coast live oaks #276 and 277; English holly #353 and 354; holly oaks #363 and 413, African fern- pine #305, Aleppo pine #392, Carolina cherry laurel #247, and red ironbark #110.

L
ow Trees in this category are in poor health or have significant defects in structure that cannot be abated with treatment. These trees can be expected to decline regardless of management. The species or individual tree may possess either characteristics that are undesirable in landscape settings or be unsuited for use areas. One hundred forty-three (143) trees had low suitability for preservation: 31 Brazilian peppers, 27 red ironbarks, 20 bronze loquats, 17 Victorian boxes, 15 olives, 8 Carolina cherry laurels, 6 Aleppo pines, 6 glossy privets; coast redwoods #129, 131, 189, 202, and 360; peppers #362, 365, 372, and 390; African fern-pine #357, coast live oak #280, silver dollar gum #342, and Southern magnolia #433.

Preliminary Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations
Appropriate tree retention develops a practical match between the location and intensity of construction activities and the quality and health of trees. The Tree Assessment was the reference point for tree condition and quality. I referred to the PGA Designs Existing Tree Removal & Preservation Plan prepared by dated March 10, 2025 to estimate tree impacts.

Surveyed trunk locations for most trees were included on the plan.

C
onstruction level plans have yet to be prepared. A final review of site plans should include the following information:
 Demolition, grading/drainage, utility, and landscape/irrigation information with survey ed t
ree locations on all plans;
 Any modifications to plans that will affect trees intended for preservation.

T
he updated project design is reconfigured to build the parking garages above-grade in locations that are hidden from public view. The general development areas remain the same, although the building footprints have changed in ways that have modified some of the tree disposition plans.

Key stands of heritage redwood trees along Moffett Boulevard and internal to the site are still planned to be preserved in the new project design.

Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company The development proposes construction of 323 new apartments over three lots across the site with above ground and surface parking. A garage driveway will connect off the end of Cypress Point Drive and travel along the east perimeter of the site, and a park will be dedicated to the City. Portions of the site will not be developed.

Impac
ts from construction byway of grading, excavation, and other activities will leave little opportunity for preservation trees. Construction of Building C and other amenities will require grading of the berm adjacent to the sound wall which will impact many trees. The berm was populated with invasive trees in fair and poor condition.

B
ased on my evaluation, 103 trees will be removed (49 heritage and 59 had low suitability for preservation). Thirty-nine (39) trees olives will be transplanted within the project area, see Table 3 Tree Disposition Totals.

T
able 3. Tree Disposition Totals
555 West Middlefield Rd., Mountain View, CA
Row Labels Heritage Non-Heritage Grand Total
Preserve 163 137 300
High 49 8 57
Moderate 68 70 138
Low 29 55 84
Off-site 16 4 20
Remove 49 54 103
High 4 9 13
Moderate 14 16 30
Low 30 29 59
Off-site 1 1
Transplant 39 39
High 23 23
Moderate 16 16
Grand Total 251 191 442
Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Preliminary Tree Preservation Guidelines
The goal of tree preservation is not merely tree survival during development but maintenance of tree health and beauty for many years. Trees retained on sites that are either subject to extensive injury during construction or are inadequately maintained become a liability rather than an asset.

The response of individual trees will depend on the amount of excavation and grading, the care with which demolition is undertaken, and the construction methods. Coordinating any construction activity inside the T
REE PROTECTION ZONE can minimize these impacts.

The following recommendations will help reduce impacts to trees from development and maintain and improve their health and vitality through the clearing, grading and construction phases.

Design recommendations

1. All plans affecting trees shall be reviewed by the Consulting Arborist with regard to tr ee
i
mpacts. These include, but are not limited to, demolition plans, grading and utility plans, landscape and irrigation plans.

2. A TREE PROTECTION ZONE must be established for trees to be preserved, in which no di
sturbance is permitted. TREE PROTECTION ZONES shall be identified for trees to be pr
eserved by the Consulting Arborist once project plans have been finalized. No grading, excavation, construction or storage of materials shall occur within that zone.

3. Underground services including utilities, sub-drains, water or sewer shall be routed ar
ound the TREE PROTECTION ZONE. Where encroachment cannot be avoided, special construction techniques such as hand digging or tunneling under roots shall be employ ed w
here necessary to minimize root injury.

4. As trees withdraw water from the soil, expansive soils may shrink within the root area.

Therefore, foundations, footings and pavements on expansive soils near trees should be designed to withstand differential displacement.

5. No underground services including utilities, sub-drains, water or sewer shall be placed in the T
REE PROTECTION ZONE.

6. Tree Preservation Notes, prepared by the Consulting Arborist, should be included on all plans.

7. Do not lime within 25’ of any tree. Lime is toxic to tree roots.

8. Any herbicides placed under paving materials must be safe for use around trees and
l
abeled for that use.

9. Irrigation systems must be designed so that no trenching will occur not within the TREE PROTECTION ZONE.

Pr
e-construction treatments and recommendations

1. The construction superintendent shall meet with the Consulting Arborist before beginnin g w
ork to discuss work procedures and tree protection.

2. Fence all trees to be retained to completely enclose the TREE PROTECTION ZONE prior to demo
lition, grubbing or grading. Fences shall be 6 ft. chain link or equivalent as approv ed by
Consulting Arborist. Fences are to remain until all grading and construction is completed.

3. Pruning trees to provide construction and access clearance may be required. Off -site trees will likely require some amount of pruning to provide a construction clearance.

4. Prune trees to be preserved to clean the crown and to provide clearance. All pruni ng s
hall be done by a State of California Licensed Tree Contractor (C61/D49). All pruning s
hall be done by Certified Arborist or Certified Tree Worker in accordance with the Best Management Practices for Pruning (International Society of Arboriculture, 2002) and Preliminary Arborist Report - 555 West Middlefield Road.

AvalonBay Communities
Updated June 2025

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company adhere to the most recent editions of the American National Standard for Tree Care Operations (Z133.1) and Pruning (A300).

5. All tree work shall comply with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act as well as California Fish and Wildlife code 3503-3513 to not disturb nesting birds. To the extent feasible tre e
pr
uning and removal should be scheduled outside of the breeding season. Breeding bird s
urveys should be conducted prior to tree work. Qualified biologists should be involved in es
tablishing work buffers for active nests.

R
ecommendations for tree protection during construction

1. Prior to beginning work, the contractors working in the vicinity of trees to be preserv ed ar
e required to meet with the Consulting Arborist at the site to review all work procedures, access routes, storage areas and tree protection measures.

2. No grading, construction, demolition or other work shall occur within the TREE PROTECTION ZONE. Any modifications must be approved and monitored by the Consulting A
rborist.

3. Fences have been erected to protect trees to be preserved. Fences define a specific TREE PROTECTION ZONE for each tree or group of trees. Fences are to remain until all site w
ork has been completed. Fences may not be relocated or removed without permission of the Consultant.

4. Construction trailers, traffic and storage areas must remain outside fenced areas at all times.

5. Prior to grading, pad preparation, excavation for foundations/footings/walls, trenching, trees may require root pruning outside the T
REE PROTECTION ZONE. Any root pruning
r
equired for construction purposes shall receive the prior approval of, and be supervis ed by
, the Consulting Arborist.

6. If injury should occur to any tree during construction, it should be evaluated as soon as possible by the Consulting Arborist so that appropriate treatments can be applied.

7. No excess soil, chemicals, debris, equipment or other materials shall be dumped or stored within the T
REE PROTECTION ZONE.

8. Any additional tree pruning needed for clearance during construction must be perfor med by
a Certified Arborist and not by construction personnel.

M
aintenance of impacted trees
Preserved trees will experience a physical environment different from that pre-development. As a result, tree health and structural stability should be monitored. Occasional pruning, fertilization, mulch, pest management, replanting and irrigation may be required. In addition, provisions for monitoring both tree health and structural stability following construction must be made a priority.

As trees age, the likelihood of failure of branches or entire trees increases; therefore, annual inspection for hazard potential is recommended.

I
f you have any questions regarding my observations or recommendations, please contact me.

H
ortScience | Bartlett Consulting
D
arya Barar, Managing Consulting Urban Forester & Arborist Registered Consulting Arborist #693
ISA Certified Arborist No. WE-6757A
ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified
Qualified Tree and Plant Appraiser

HortScience│Bartlett Consulting ● Divisions of The F.A. Bartlett Tree Expert Company Exhibits
Tree Assessment Plan
Tree Assessment

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
1 Coast redwood 25 79 Yes 4 High Canopy slightly thin; good form and structure. 2 Coast redwood 23 72 Yes 4 High Canopy slightly thin; good form and structure. 3 Coast redwood 26 82 Yes 4 Moderate Lost top; crown slightly thin; good form and structure. 4 Southern magnolia 10 31 No 3 Moderate Trunk bows south. 5 Southern magnolia 13 41 No 4 High Good form and structure; interior tree. 6 Southern magnolia 13 41 No 4 High Good form and structure; over pruned; slightly thin. 7 Windmill palm 11,10,10,9
,9 154 Yes 5 High Multiple stems from base.
8 Southern magnolia 13 41 No 4 High Good form and structure; over pruned; slightly thin. 9 Olive 11,9,9,7 113 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'. 10 Olive 14,12,11,8
,7,7 185 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; trunk wounds; dense crown.
11 Olive
13,12,10,9 138 Yes 3 Moderate
Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; trunk wounds on interior stems; close to building on south; thin crown. 12 Olive 9,9,9,8 110 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; close to building on south.
13 Olive 11,10,8,7 113 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; close to building on south.
14 Olive 12,9,9,9,7,
6 163 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; close to building on west.
15 Olive 10,10,8,7,
7 132 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; full crown. 16 Red ironbark 21 66 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at 15'; previously topped at 30' with resprouts; poor form and structure; thin crown.
17 Red ironbark 10 31 No 1 Low Previously topped at 20'; little live material remains; poor form and structure; narrow form.
18 Red ironbark 16 50 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at 15'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure.

Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
19 Olive 10,10,9,7 113 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; close to building on east.
20 Olive 9,9,6,6 94 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; close to building on east; thin crown; trunk wound on west stem. 21 Red ironbark 11 35 No 2 Low Previously topped at 20'; little live material remains; poor form and structure.
22 Red ironbark 13 41 No 2 Low Previously topped at 20'; crook at 6'; poor form and structure. 23 Victorian box 8,8,3,3 69 Yes 1 Low Multiple attachments at base; suppressed form; crown bowed east; north stem failed.
24 Victorian box 6,2 25 No 1 Low Upright stem failed; poor form and structure. 25 Olive 12,11,8,7 119 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; full crown. 26 Victorian box 6,4,3,2 47 No 2 Low Suppressed form; crown bowed southeast; thin crown. 27 Removed - 82 - - - -
28 Removed - 116 - - - -
29 Victorian box 7,4,2 41 No 2 Low Suppressed form; crown bows southeast. 30 Victorian box 9,7,4 63 Yes 3 Moderate Suppressed form; crowded & one-sided east. 31 Silver dollar gum 25 79 Yes 4 - Off-site, no tag; multiple attachments at 15'; extends 15' east over wall; full crown.
32 Silver dollar gum 15 47 No 4 - Off-site, no tag; extends 10' east over wall; full crown. 33 Red ironbark 25 79 Yes 3 Low Previously topped at 30' with heavy resprout; poor form and structure.
34 Red ironbark 15 47 No 2 Low Codominant trunks at 20'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure; crook at 7'.
35 Red ironbark 15 47 No 2 Low Multiple attachments at 12'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure; thin upper crown.
37 Olive 8,9,9 82 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; close to building on south; thin crown to south; dieback.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
38 Olive 13,10,8,6 116 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; full crown; close to building on south.
39 Olive 13,12,12,1
0 148 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; full crown; close to building on south.
40 Removed - - - - - -
41 Olive 16,11,8 110 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; trunk wounds; crown bows west.
42 Olive 16,12,9,9 145 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; dense epicormics; trunk wounds.
43 Bronze loquat 10 31 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 6'; previously topped at 12'; slight lean north.
44 Olive 19,14,12 141 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 20'; dense epicormics; close to building on south.
45 Bronze loquat 9,6,6,6,4 97 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 2'; crowded with slight lean west; close to building.
46 Bronze loquat 8 25 No 2 Low Crowded; leans southwest; poor form and structure. 47 Bronze loquat 7,7,6 63 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; suppressed form top west; trunk wounds; close to building.
48 Bronze loquat 9,9,9,6,6 123 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; upright form; close to building. 49 Bronze loquat 9,8,7 75 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 2'; one-sided to southwest; close to building and suppressed.
50 Removed - - - - - -
51 Southern magnolia 13 41 No 5 High Good young tree; excellent form and structure. 52 Olive 11,8,8 85 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; minor trunk wounds.
53 Olive 13,12,12,9
,9,7 195 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; pruned away from building on north; epicormic growth.
54 Olive 12,11,11 107 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 20'; trunk wounds; full crown.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
55 Bronze loquat 12,8 63 Yes 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at 2''; one sided east; previously topped for building overhang.
56 Removed - - - - - -
57 Southern magnolia 14 44 No 4 High Good form and structure; slightly thin. 58 Removed - - - - - -
59 Bronze loquat 13 41 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 5'; one-sided to west; soil recently disturbed at base.
60 Bronze loquat 8,5,4 53 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; crowded & one-sided to west. 61 Bronze loquat 6,5 35 No 3 Low Codominant trunks at base; crowded & one-sided to west; thin crown.
62 Bronze loquat 10 31 No 3 Moderate Crowded; upright form. 63 Removed - 145 - - - -
64 Bronze loquat 8,7,6,3,3 85 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 3'; upright form. 65 Bronze loquat 9,9,8,4 94 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 3'; upright form. 66 Bronze loquat 10 31 No 2 Low Multiple attachments at 5'; upright form; slightly thin; poor color; dieback.
67 Bronze loquat 6,6,2 44 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; small, asymmetric crown. 68 Bronze loquat 6,5,2 41 No 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; small crown. 69 Bronze loquat 7,6 41 No 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at base. 70 Bronze loquat 8,4 38 No 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at 2'; narrow form. 71 Bronze loquat 8,7 47 No 4 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; upright form; full crown. 72 Bronze loquat 7,7,6,6,4,4 107 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; upright; full crown. 73 Bronze loquat 10 31 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 5'; narrow form. 74 Bronze loquat 9,6,5 63 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; full crown. 75 Bronze loquat 9,8,7,7,6 116 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 15'; thin crown with dieback; declining.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
76 Carolina cherry
laurel 13 41 No 1 Low Previously topped; close to building; extensive twig dieback; all but dead.
77 Carolina cherry
laurel 13 41 No 2 Low Leans southeast; previously topped at 25'; close to building; twig dieback.
78 Olive 16,13,11,8 151 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; full, dense crown.
79 Olive 12,10,10,9
,8 154 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; some stems lean east; pruned on west for building; full crown. 80 Removed - 107 - - - -
81 Olive 9,8,7,6 94 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; pruned south for building.
82 Olive 13,13,12 119 Yes 4 High Codominant trunks at 1'; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 83 Olive 11,11,9,9,
7 148 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 84 Removed - 126 - - - -
85 Bronze loquat 9 28 No 4 Moderate Upright form; previously topped at 15'; in interior courtyard; close to building.
86 Olive 14,12,12,1
0 151 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 20'; dense crown. 87 Bronze loquat 11,7,6 75 Yes 3 Low Narrow crown; growing between buildings; crown extends higher than building; suppressed.
88 Bronze loquat 12 38 No 3 Low Narrow crown; growing between buildings; codominant at 12'; crown grows higher than building.
89 Olive 15,12,12,1
1,9 185 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 3'; previously topped at 18'; dense crown; epicormic growth.
90 Olive 14,12,9 110 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 3'; previously topped at 15'; upright; minor sunscald on stems.
91 Olive 12,12,10,1
0,8 163 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; trunk wounds; slightly thin crown.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
92 Olive 13,10,10,9
,8 157 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; slightly thin crown.
93 Olive 11,9,9,7 113 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; slightly thin crown.
94 Olive 14,13,13 126 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; dense crown; close to building.
95 Olive 17,12,12,5 145 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; trunk wounds.
96 Olive 12,12,9,6 123 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; close to building on east.
97 Victorian box 7,4 35 No 3 Moderate Crowded; previously topped at 15'; twig dieback. 98 Monterey pine 30 94 Yes 3 - Off-site, no tag; extends 20' south over wall; sequoia pitch moth. 99 Victorian box 9,7,6,6 88 Yes 3 Low Crowded; one-sided to south.; basal and trunk decay. 101 Victorian box 6,5,4,4 60 No 1 Low Crowded; one-sided to south.; basal & trunk decay; dieback. 102 Victorian box 6,3,2 35 No 3 Moderate Suppressed and one-sided to south. 103 Red ironbark 28 88 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at 15'; south stem previously topped at 35'; poor form and structure; poor form and structure.
104 Victorian box 6,5 35 No 2 Low Crowded; one-sided to south.; twig dieback; suppressed form. 105 Victorian box 7 22 No 2 Low Trunk decay on south stem; suppressed form. 106 Victorian box 9,4,3 50 Yes 3 Moderate Minor twig dieback; small stem attaches at 1'. 107 Victorian box 6,2 25 No 3 Low Suppressed; leans south; twig dieback. 108 Victorian box 7,6,4 53 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; trunk decay; suppressed form. 109 Monterey pine 32 101 Yes 2 - Off-site, no tag; pine pitch canker; dieback; extends 20' S; over wall; sequoia pitch moth.
110 Red ironbark 25 79 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 15'; previously topped at 35'; slightly thin.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
111 Monterey pine 16 50 Yes 2 - Off-site, no tag; sequoia pitch moth; extends 20' south over wall; browning foliage.
112 Olive 12,10,9,8,
7,6 163 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities; planted on bank; poor color.
113 Olive 9,8,8,6,5 113 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities; planted on bank.
114 Olive 9,8,7,4 88 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; small crown; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities; planted on bank.
115 Coast redwood 26 82 Yes 4 Moderate Group of 5 trees on mound; trunk sweeps to east; previously pruned on west for overhead utilities.
116 Coast redwood 27 85 Yes 4 High Group of 5 trees on mound; trunk sweeps to east; previously pruned west for overhead utilities.
117 Coast redwood 23 72 Yes 4 High Group of 5 trees on mound; interior tree; high, narrow crown. 118 Coast redwood 28 88 Yes 4 High Group of 5 trees on mound; one sided to east. 119 Coast redwood 18 58 Yes 4 High Group of 5 trees on mound; one sided to north. 120 Olive 11,10,7,7 110 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities; thin crown; branch failure on north. 121 Olive 10,10,9,9,
7 141 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities; full crown.
122 Olive 9,9,8,4 94 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; small crown; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities; full crown.
123 Coast redwood 26 82 Yes 4 High Group of 3 trees on mound; upright form; previously pruned west for overhead utilities.
124 Coast redwood 38 119 Yes 4 High Group of 3 on mound; upright form. 125 Coast redwood 48 151 Yes 4 High Group of 3 on mound; one-sided to east. 126 Olive 13,10,10,8 129 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities; poor color; dieback.
127 Olive 8,8,7,7,4 107 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; slightly thin; beneath overhead utilities; poor color dieback.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
128 Olive 9,9,9,7 107 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; very thin crown; beneath overhead utilities; poor color dieback.
129 Coast redwood 30 94 Yes 2 Low Group of 6 on mound; leans north; very thin crown; corrected trunk sweeps at 8'.
130 Coast redwood 40 126 Yes 4 Moderate Group of 6 on mound; upright form; pruned west for overhead utilities.
131 Coast redwood 8 25 No 2 Low Group of 6 on mound; central tree; suppressed form. 132 Coast redwood 35 110 Yes 4 High Group of 6 on mound; upright form; slightly thin; interior tree. 133 Coast redwood 40 126 Yes 4 High Group of 6 on mound; one-sided to east; good upright form; dense crown.
134 Coast redwood 20 63 Yes 3 Moderate Group of 6 on mound; one-sided to southeast; trunk sweeps at 5'; poor form and structure.
135 Olive 10,8,7,7 101 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; small, thin crown; beneath overhead utilities.
136 Olive 10,8,8 82 Yes 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at 2'; previously topped at 15'; small, thin crown; beneath overhead utilities.
137 Olive 11,10,10,9 126 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; beneath overhead utilities.
138 Olive 13,11,9,8 129 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; full crown; in parking planter.
139 Olive 14,11,10,8 135 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 140 Olive 6,6,5,5,4 82 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; stump sprout; basal decay; previously topped at 15'.
141 Olive 10,10,8,8,
8 138 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; slightly thin; poor color.
142 Olive 13,10,9,9 129 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; trunk wounds; full crown.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
143 Red ironbark 32 101 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at 4' and 10'; 4' codominant stem failed; previously topped at 30' with resprouts.
144 Southern magnolia 17 53 Yes 4 Moderate Pruned on north for building; close to building; good form and structure; full crown.
145 Red ironbark
25 79 Yes 3 Low
Growing between buildings; crown extends over top of building; leans south; previously topped at 35'; poor form and structure. 146 Bronze loquat 10 31 No 4 High Good young tree; previously topped at 15'. 147 Bronze loquat 7 22 No 3 Moderate Growing close to building; one-sided to west.; previously topped at 15'.
148 Olive 16,13,12,1
1 163 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 20'; trunk wounds; full crown.
149 Olive 16,11,10,1
0 148 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 20'; trunk wounds; full crown.
150 Olive 14,9 72 Yes 4 Moderate Codominant trunks at 2'; previously topped at 20'; stem removed south.
151 Olive 10,10,10,9
,8 148 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; trunk wounds; full crown.
152 Red ironbark 16 50 Yes 2 Low Previously topped at 20'; small, thin crown; poor form and structure.
153 Red ironbark 32 101 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 15'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure.
154 Southern magnolia 13 41 No 4 High Pruned on north for building; good upright form. 155 Olive 13,11,11,1
0 141 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; thin crown; basal wound; little foliage.
156 Olive 15,13,9 116 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 157 Olive 11,10,10,9 126 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; trunk wounds; minor sunscald on west facing stem.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
158 Southern magnolia 12 38 No 3 Moderate Close to building on north; epicormics; poor color. 159 Southern magnolia 12 38 No 4 Moderate Good young tree; surface roots. 160 Red ironbark
45 141 Yes 3 Low
Multiple attachments at 5'; previously topped at 35' with heavy resprouts; poor form and structure; bark checking below south stem.
161 Red ironbark 22 69 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 10'; previously topped at 35' with heavy resprouts; poor form and structure.
162 Red ironbark 19 60 Yes 3 Low Leans west; previously topped at 35'; poor form and structure; thin crown.
163 Red ironbark 28 88 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 10'; previously topped at 35'; poor form and structure; thin crown.
164 Red ironbark 22 69 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 8'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure; thin crown.
165 Red ironbark 18 57 Yes 3 Low Small, high, thin crown; previously topped at 35'; poor form and structure.
166 Red ironbark 18 57 Yes 1 Low Leans south over street; trunk wound from stem failure on north; previously topped at 35'; thin crown.
167 Red ironbark 24 75 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at 8'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure; thin crown.
168 Red ironbark 10 31 No 2 Low Small crown; previously topped at 15'; little remains; suppressed. 169 Red ironbark 24 75 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 10'; previously topped at 30'; very poor branch structure; thin crown.
170 Red ironbark 25 79 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at 7'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure; thin crown.
171 Red ironbark
24 75 Yes 3 Low
Codominant trunks at 10'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure; reduce or remove south facing stem over street; twig dieback.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
172 Red ironbark 22 69 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at 8'; previously topped at 30'; poor form and structure.
173 Southern magnolia 17 53 Yes 3 Moderate Codominant at 8'; crown slightly thin. 174 Southern magnolia 16 50 Yes 4 High Good upright form; crown slightly thin; strong central leader. 175 Coast redwood 26 82 Yes 4 High Good form and structure. 176 Olive 14,12,11,1
0,8,8 198 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; minor trunk wounds; full crown.
177 Olive 13,11,10,1
0,9,9 195 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; minor trunk wounds.
178 Coast redwood 38 119 Yes 4 High Group of 3; one-sided to west. 179 Coast redwood 64 201 Yes 3 Moderate Group of 3; corrected lean southeast; thin crown; massive tree. 180 Coast redwood 45 141 Yes 4 High Group of 3; slightly one sided to south; full crown; good form. 181 Coast redwood 23 72 Yes 4 High Good young tree; full crown. 182 Coast redwood 24 75 Yes 5 High Good young tree; full crown. 183 Olive 12,9,7,6 107 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; thin crown; minor trunk wounds with decay.
184 Olive 10,8,6,5 91 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; thin crown. 185 Coast redwood 32 101 Yes 4 Moderate Corrected form; thin upper crown. 186 Coast redwood 32 101 Yes 4 Moderate Lost top; interior tree; leans east; thin crown; corrected form. 187 Coast redwood 50 157 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments in upper crown; full crown; massive base. 188 Coast redwood 28 88 Yes 3 Moderate Trunk bows at 6' and is suppressed to southeast. 189 Coast redwood 32 101 Yes 3 Low Leans north; poor form and structure; twiggy foliage. 190 Coast redwood 31 97 Yes 3 Moderate Low branch at 18; codominant high in crown. 191 Coast redwood 39 123 Yes 4 High In group; good upright form. 192 Coast redwood 42 132 Yes 4 High In group; full narrow crown. 193 Coast redwood 38 119 Yes 4 High In group; slight bow at 6'; full crown.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
194 Olive 13,13,12,1
0,7 173 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 195 Coast redwood 44 138 Yes 4 Moderate In group; one-sided to east; full crown; codominant high in crown. 196 Coast redwood 26 82 Yes 3 Moderate In group; narrow form. 197 Coast redwood 35 110 Yes 4 High In group; close to base of tree #198; full crown. 198 Coast redwood 28 88 Yes 3 Moderate In group; narrow crown. 199 Coast redwood 26 82 Yes 3 Moderate In group; one-sided to north; codominant high in crown; trunk twisting; slightly thin.
200 Coast redwood 37 116 Yes 4 Moderate In group; slight lean to south.; thinning crown. 201 Coast redwood 42 132 Yes 4 High In group; one-sided to southwest; good upright form; full crown. 202 Coast redwood 14 44 Yes 3 Low Suppressed; small crown. 203 Coast redwood 43 135 Yes 4 Moderate In group; one-sided to west; close to tree #204; lost top. 204 Coast redwood 32 101 Yes 3 Moderate Lost top; trunk wounds; one sided to north; some browning foliage. 205 Southern magnolia 9 28 No 3 Moderate Good form; very thin crown. 206 Southern magnolia 9 28 No 4 High Thin crown.
207 Southern magnolia 8 25 No 4 Moderate Minor dieback; lost central leader; slightly thin crown. 208 Bronze loquat 9,8,8,8,7,6
,5 145 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; thin crown; poor color; twig dieback.
209 Olive 12,11,10,9 132 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; thin crown. 210 Olive 14,12,9,7,
5 148 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; thin crown; twig dieback; poor color.
211 Removed - - - - - -
212 Southern magnolia 7 22 No 3 Moderate Thin crown; poor color; minor dieback in upper crown.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
213 Olive 12,9,8,7,5,
5 145 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'. 214 Olive 9,8,8,7,6 119 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; narrow form; thin crown.
215 Coast redwood 34 107 Yes 4 Moderate Upright form; burls on lower trunk; slightly thin. 216 Olive 10,10,10,9
,8 148 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; slightly thin. 217 Olive 10,10,10,9
,7 145 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; slightly thin. 218 Olive 14,11,11,1
0,8 170 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; full crown. 219 Olive 13,10,9,8,
8 151 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; sun scald/trunk wounds; thin crown; poor color.
220 Olive 13,12,9 107 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; sun scald; pruned west for building; trunk decay.
221 Red ironbark 18 57 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at 7'; previously topped at 20'; leans north; dieback in upper crown.
222 Olive 12,8,8,6,6 126 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; west stem previously topped at 8'; pruned on west for building.
223 Olive 13,12,10,8 135 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 224 Olive 13,12,12,7 138 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; slightly thin. 225 Olive 13,12,12,1
0 147 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; dieback; slightly thin; poor color.
226 Olive 14,11,9 107 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; sun scald/trunk wounds; pruned on west for building.
227 Olive 14,13,13 126 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; sun scald; full crown.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
228 Olive 14,13,9,5 129 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 229 Carolina cherry
laurel 17 53 Yes 1 Low Twig dieback; Ganoderma conk at base north. 230 Olive 11,11,7,4 104 Yes 3 , Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 15'; slightly thin, small crown.
231 Olive 10,8,8,7 104 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; full crown. 232 Olive 13,12,11,9 141 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 233 Olive 18,15 104 Yes 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 15'; trunk wounds east with decay.
234 Olive 15,14,11,1
0 157 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; pruned for building on west; full crown.
235 Olive 19,10 91 Yes 4 High Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 15'; pruned for building on west; full crown.
236 Olive 11,11,10,7 123 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; full crown; pruned for building on west.
237 Olive 13,12,10,1
0,9 170 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; 9" and central stems have decay on the north side.
238 Olive 15,10,10 110 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; pruned for building on north; full crown; close to building.
239 Carolina cherry
laurel 10 31 No 2 Low Upright form; twig dieback; poor color. 240 Olive 14,11,11,9 141 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; slightly thin. 241 Olive 10,10,6,6 101 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; thin crown. 242 Carolina cherry
laurel 13 41 No 2 Low Bark loss; dieback; extensive sunscald and trunk decay.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
243 Carolina cherry
laurel 6 19 No 2 Low Extensive dieback; declining; half of tree is dead. 244 Olive 16,15,9 126 Yes 5 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; full, dense crown.
245 Olive 12,10,8,7,
6 135 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 18'; minor sun scald on south stem; pruned for building on north; full crown. 246 Olive 13,11,10,7 129 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; pruned for building on northwest; small crown.
247 Carolina cherry
laurel 15 47 No 3 Moderate Upright form; branch wound; thin crown. 248 Carolina cherry
laurel 14 44 No 3 Low Codominant trunks at 6'; slight lean east; thin crown. 249 Olive 14,12,9 110 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; pruned for building on west; full crown.
250 Olive 10,10,9,8 116 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 4'; previously topped at 18'; pruned for building on west.
251 Removed - - - - - -
252 Removed - - - - - -
253 Olive 17,9,6 101 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; trunk wounds; thin crown; decay at base.
254 Olive 14,10,9,8 129 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; full crown. 255 Removed - - - - - -
256 Olive 11,10,8 91 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 20'; fair form and structure.
257 Olive 11,11,5 85 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 20'; sparse crown. 258 Olive 24,8 101 Yes 4 Moderate Codominant trunks at 1'; previously topped at 18'; dense, full crown; minor trunk wounds.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
259 Olive 13,12,10,9 138 Yes 5 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; minor sun scald and trunk wounds; dense, full crown.
260 Olive 17,16 104 Yes 4 High Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 18'; full, dense crown; planted on mound.
261 Olive 8,6,5 60 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 12'; small, thin crown.
262 Olive 10,10,8,7 110 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; thin crown; trunk wounds with decay.
263 Olive 11,10,10,7 119 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 264 Olive 8,8,6,5 85 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 12'; small, thin crown.
265 Olive 10,6 50 Yes 3 Low Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 10'; thin, small crown; poor form and structure; base splitting apart.
266 Olive 13,12,10,9
,8 163 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; full, dense crown.
267 Olive 21,14 110 Yes 5 High Codominant trunks at 3'; previously topped at 18'; full crown; excellent form and structure.
268 Glossy privet 16,13,11 126 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at 8'; good form and structure; engulfed in ivy; very little foliage.
269 Brazilian pepper 14,12,9,8,
8,7,7,6 182 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; crown bowed to south; engulfed in ivy; on uphill slope; branches are a tangled mess.
270 Aleppo pine 38 119 Yes 1 Low Codominant trunks at 15'; leans to southwest; heavy weight over parking lot; top bows to southwest; failed stem.
271 Brazilian pepper 12,8,8,8,7,
7,6,6 157 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; hedgerow; pruned hard at edge of parking lot; under failed stem of #270.
272 Brazilian pepper 8,8,6,6,5,4 116 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; hedgerow; pruned hard at edge of parking lot; branches are a tangled mess.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
273 Brazilian pepper 6,6,5,4,3,3 85 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; hedgerow; pruned hard at edge of parking lot; branches are a tangled mess.
274 Brazilian pepper 8,7,6,5,4,3 104 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; hedgerow; pruned hard at edge of parking lot; branches are a tangled mess.
275 Brazilian pepper 8 25 No 2 Low Part of hedgerow; pruned hard at edge of parking lot; poor form and structure; multiple attachments at 6'.
276 Coast live oak 33 141 Yes 3 Moderate Leans to southwest; laterals to south; dieback in upper crown. 277 Coast live oak
28 88 Yes 3 Moderate
Codominant trunks at 6'; one-sided to west; base 6" from curb; minor asphalt displacement; majority of canopy extends southwest over parking lot.
278 Brazilian pepper 8,6,6,7,5,4
,3,3 113 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; part of hedgerow; pruned hard at edge of parking lot; partially failed at base.
279 Glossy privet 6,6,6,6,5,3
,3 101 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; part of hedgerow; pruned hard at edge of parking lot.
280 Coast live oak 26 82 Yes 1 Low Tree failed.
281 Glossy privet 9,8,8,7,7 123 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; upright form; twig dieback. 282 Olive 11,10,8,8,
5 132 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; crowded form.
283 Glossy privet 8,7,5 63 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; crowded & one-sided to south; twig dieback.
284 Coast redwood 32 101 Yes 3 Moderate Lost top; crowded form; lower branch dieback. 285 Glossy privet 7,5,5 53 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; crowded & one-sided to south; dieback.
286 Coast redwood 27 85 Yes 3 Moderate Crowded; codominant high in crown; one-sided to west.; dieback on north.
287 Glossy privet 7,6,3 50 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; crowded & one-sided to south; thin crown; dieback.
288 Olive 12,12,11 110 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; full crown. 289 Coast redwood 23,21 138 Yes 4 Moderate Codominant trunks at 3'; crowded form; one-sided to south.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
290 Olive 12,10,9,6 116 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 12'. 291 Olive 11,6,5,5,4,
3 107 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2' and 3'; previously topped at 12'; trunk wounds.
292 Coast redwood 48 151 Yes 4 Moderate Upright form; crown slightly thin; lower branch dieback. 293 Coast redwood 26 82 Yes 3 Moderate Crowded; asymmetric crown; thin crown. 294 Coast redwood 46 145 Yes 4 High Upright form; full crown; pruned for building on south. 295 Coast redwood 30,36 207 Yes 4 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; one stem upright; one stem sweeps east; minor dieback.
296 Southern magnolia 14 44 No 4 High Good young tree; tipped back; slightly thin crown. 297 Southern magnolia 10 31 No 4 Moderate Upright form; slightly thin. 298 Southern magnolia 14 44 No 4 High Codominant trunks at 10'; tipped back. 299 Coast redwood 45,40 267 Yes 4 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; slightly thin and dieback in upper crown.
300 Coast redwood 30,21 160 Yes 4 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; narrow form; thin canopies. 301 Southern magnolia 12 38 No 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at 6'; fair structure; tipped back; thinning crown; surface roots.
302 Coast redwood 48,22,12,1
0 289 Yes 5 High Multiple attachments at base; good form and structure; full crown; surface roots in turf.
303 Coast redwood 47 148 Yes 4 High Good form and structure; minor thinning. 304 Olive 11,10,9,8 119 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 12'; dense crown.
305 African fern-pine 8 25 No 4 Moderate Crowded; one-sided to west; dense crown. 306 Olive 6,3,3,3 47 No 1 Low Multiple attachments at base; suppressed; extensive dieback; previously topped at 8'.
307 Coast redwood 36 113 Yes 4 Moderate Good form and structure; slightly thin. 308 Coast redwood 21 66 Yes 4 Moderate Good form and structure; crown lifted to 12'; slightly thin. 309 Coast redwood 22 69 Yes 4 Moderate Good form and structure; crown lifted to 12'; slightly thin. 310 Coast redwood 22 69 Yes 4 Moderate Good form and structure; crown lifted to 12'; slightly thin.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
311 Olive 9,8,7,7,5 113 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 12'; trunk wounds; fruit in parking lot.
312 Olive 13,12,9,6 126 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; trunk wounds; fruit in parking lot.
313 Bronze loquat 6,6,5,4,4 79 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; pruned for building on north; fair form and structure.
314 Bronze loquat 7,7 44 No 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; pruned for building on north; fair form and structure.
315 Olive 13,10,8,8,
7 145 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; central stem thinning; heavy fruit.
316 Removed - 82 - - -
317 Olive 9,7,7,6,4 104 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; south stems declining; heavy fruit; thin crown.
318 Olive 14,12,9,9 138 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; dense crown; heavy fruit.
319 Olive 9,9,8,8 107 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; little live material remains.
320 Olive 12,9,7,7 110 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; pruned for building on west; heavy fruit.
321 Removed - 50 - - - -
322 Removed - 69 - - - -
323 Olive 11,11,8,6,
5 129 Yes 4 Moderate
Multiple attachments at 2'; previously topped at 15'; pruned for building on east; cavity filled with water in attachment; slightly thin crown.
324 Olive 11,11,8,8,
6 138 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 15'; pruned for building on east.; fruit on walkway.
325 Olive 9,9,6,6 91 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; thin crown. 326 Olive 11,11,10,5 116 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 15'; pruned for building on east; full crown.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
327 Olive 11,9,8,7,5 126 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on south; twig dieback.
328 Bronze loquat 5,5,3,1 44 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 329 Olive 9,9,8,8,6 126 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; trunk wounds; pruned for building on south; thin crown.
330 Bronze loquat 9 28 No 3 Moderate Upright form; previously topped at 30'; pruned for building on south; high crown extends over building.
331 Bronze loquat 10,7 53 Yes 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 30'; pruned for building on south; high crown extends over building.
332 Bronze loquat 8 25 No 2 Low Small crown; previously topped at 25'; poor form and structure; narrow form.
333 Bronze loquat 7,4 35 No 3 Low Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 20'; narrow form; poor form and structure.
334 Bronze loquat 7,6,5 57 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 335 Bronze loquat 6,6,5,5,4 82 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on east.; dense crown.
336 Bronze loquat 8,6,6,5,3 88 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on east; dense crown.
337 Bronze loquat 6,6,3,3 57 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on east; dense crown.
338 Bronze loquat 7,6,3,2,2 63 Yes 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on east; dense crown.
339 Bronze loquat 6,5,2 41 No 4 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on east; good form and structure.
340 Removed - 167 - - - -
341 Removed - 75 - - - -
342 Silver dollar gum 21 66 Yes 3 Low High crown extends over top of building; multiple topping points; growing between buildings; codominant trunks at 12'.
343 Bronze loquat 6,5,5 50 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; crown under building.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
344 Bronze loquat 9,7,6 69 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on west; high, small crown.
345 Bronze loquat 6,3 28 No 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at base; previously topped at 20'; narrow form. 346 Bronze loquat 8,4,2,2 50 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; high, small crown, decay on west stem.
347 Bronze loquat 7,5,5 53 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on west; high crown.
348 Bronze loquat 7 22 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 8'; previously topped at 20'; pruned for building on west; decay in pruning wounds.
349 Olive 10,10,9,7,
7,6,4 154 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 1'; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 350 Olive 15,10,9,9 135 Yes 4 High Multiple attachments at 3'; previously topped at 18'; full crown. 351 Victorian box 6,6,2 44 No 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; bows to south; poor form and structure; thin crown.
352 English holly 7 22 No 4 High Good young tree.
353 English holly 7,3,2 38 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 2'. 354 English holly 7 22 No 3 Moderate One-sided to south; edge of parking structure. 355 Brazilian pepper 8,8,7,6,5,5
,5,5,4,3,3 123 Yes 1 Low
Multiple attachments at base; stems bow west; base outside dripline; dense crown; failing.
356 Olive 6,5 35 No 2 Low Codominant trunks at 3'; small, thin crown; large trunk cavity. 357 African fern-pine 8,7,6 66 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; asymmetric form; thin crown. 358 Southern magnolia 11 35 No 4 High Good young tree; slightly thin. 359 Holly oak 14 44 Yes 4 - Off-site; codominant trunks at trunks at 8'; good form; fair structure.
360 Coast redwood 7 22 Yes 3 Low Thin crown; crowded form. 361 Brazilian pepper 19,8 85 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at base; large stem has significant lean over street; decay at base.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
362 Pepper tree 17,10 85 Yes 3 Low Poor form and structure; slightly thin crown. 363 Holly oak 7,5 38 Yes 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at 1'; slightly crowded form; sooty mold. 364 Brazilian pepper 9,7,6,6,5,3
,3 113 Yes 1 Low Partially failed; multiple attachments at base; poor structure; dense crown.
365 Pepper tree 15 47 No 2 Low Codominant trunks at 5'; poor form and structure; thin crown. 366 Brazilian pepper 20,12 101 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at 3'; thin crown; poor form. 367 Removed - 261 - - - -
368 Glossy privet 6,4,4 44 No 2 Low No tag; multiple attachments at base; thin crown. 369 Glossy privet 7,4,4 47 No 2 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; poor form and structure; crowded form. 370 Removed - 223 - - - -
371 Aleppo pine 17 53 Yes 1 Low Poor form and structure; lost central leader; dieback. 372 Pepper tree 20 63 Yes 3 Low Base outside of dripline; canopy hangs over sound wall. 373 Brazilian pepper 12,10,9,9,
7,6 167 Yes 1 Low Multiple attachments at base; poor form and structure; crowded; under failed stem.
374 Aleppo pine 14 44 No 2 Low Partial failure at base; base outside of dripline; crown extends south over sound wall.
375 Brazilian pepper 6,5,5,4,4 75 Yes 2 Low Poor form and structure; twig and branch dieback. 376 Glossy privet 6,6,4 50 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; high crown; crowded. 377 Brazilian pepper 11,5,5 66 Yes 1 Low Multiple attachments at base; poor form and structure; crowded. 378 Brazilian pepper 16,15,13,1
2,12,10,9,
6,5
245 Yes 3 Low
Multiple attachments at base; stems separating at base; spreading crown; twig dieback.
379 Removed - 57 - - - -
380 Brazilian pepper 6,5 35 No 1 Low Codominant trunks at base; poor form and structure; crowded. 381 Brazilian pepper 12,10,6,5,
5 119 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at 1'; poor form and structure.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
382 Brazilian pepper 9 Yes 1 Low Failed at base.
383 Brazilian pepper 8,7,6,6,5,4
,4,4 113 Yes 1 Low Failed at base.
384 Brazilian pepper 13,11,9,6 123 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; poor form and structure; dieback. 385 Brazilian pepper 7,6,5,5,4 85 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; poor form and structure; dieback. 386 Brazilian pepper 14,10,9,8,
5,5 160 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at 1'; significant lean south toward parking lot; poor form and structure.
387 Brazilian pepper 11,7 57 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at base; poor form and structure. 388 Aleppo pine 29 91 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at 5'; poor form and structure; dieback. 389 Brazilian pepper 8,6,5,5,5 91 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; crowded form; poor structure. 390 Pepper tree 18 57 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments high in crown; crowded form. 391 Brazilian pepper 14,14,12,1
0,7 179 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at 2'; heavy lean southwest over parking lot; poor form and structure.
392 Aleppo pine 33 104 Yes 3 Moderate Codominant trunks at 6'; fair form and structure; slightly thin crown.
393 Brazilian pepper 13,12 79 Yes 2 Low Codominant trunks at base; base outside of dripline; crowded. 394 Brazilian pepper 8,8,7,6,5 107 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; poor form and structure; dieback. 395 Brazilian pepper 15,7 69 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; crowded; poor form and structure. 396 Brazilian pepper 10,9,8,8,8,
8,7,7,6 160 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; spreading form; poor structure. 397 Brazilian pepper 7,6,6,6 79 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at base; crowded; poor form and structure. 398 Aleppo pine 30 94 Yes 1 Low Large 8'-long tearout wound with decay on south; lost central leader; poor form and structure; top failed.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
399 Aleppo pine 28,28,16,1
4,13 311 Yes 2 Low Multiple attachments at 2'; poor form and structure; slightly thin crown; history of branch failures.
400 Brazilian pepper 13 41 No 1 Low Partial failure at base; base outside of dripline; poor form and structure.
401 Brazilian pepper 15,9,8,7 123 Yes 2 Low Large stem leans southwest; multiple attachments at base; poor form and structure.
402 Brazilian pepper 6 19 No 1 Low Poor form and structure; suppressed form. 403 Coast live oak 25,19 138 Yes 4 - Off-site; codominant trunks at 3'; slight lean south; crowded form. 404 Coast live oak 25 79 Yes 3 - Off-site; trunk bends north toward Middlefield; fair form and structure.
405 Olive 10,5 47 No 2 - Off-site; poor form and structure; suppressed. 406 Coast live oak 14 44 Yes 3 - Off-site; asymmetrical crown; twig dieback. 407 Pepper tree 10,8 57 Yes 2 - Off-site; suppressed; poor form and structure. 408 Coast live oak 19,11 94 Yes 3 - Off-site; codominant trunks at 2'; crowded form. 409 Coast live oak 16,10 82 Yes 3 - Off-site; codominant trunks at base; crowded form. 410 Coast live oak 8 25 Yes 3 - Off-site; leans east over sound wall; crowded form. 411 Coast redwood 16 50 Yes 3 - Off-site; lost central leader; slightly thin crown; (206). 412 Holly oak 6 19 Yes 3 - Off-site; suppressed; thin crown. 413 Holly oak 5 16 Yes 3 Moderate Trunk swoops up; crowded form; high crown. 414 Blue gum 31,11,11,1
1,8 226 Yes 2 - Multiple attachments at 2'; storm drain 1' from base; trunk wound; trunks removed at attachments; high crown.
415 Removed - - - - - -
416 Blue gum 19,18,14,1
2,12,8 261 Yes 3 -
Multiple attachments at 3' with narrow attachments; high crown; crowded by adjacent trees; thin crown; twig and branch dieback. 417 Blue gum 16,14,13 135 Yes 2 - Multiple attachments at 2'; stems bow over street; high crown; crowded; thin crown; twig and branch dieback.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
418 Blue gum
21,10 97 Yes 2 -
Codominant trunks at 1'; crown leans east; crowded by adjacent tree; high crown; thin crown; twig and branch dieback.
419 Blue gum 35,18,18 223 Yes 2 - Multiple attachments at 2' and 4'; spreading form; thin crown; twig and branch dieback.
420 Bronze loquat 6,4,4,3 53 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; crown under building eave. 421 Bronze loquat 7,6,4 53 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; previously topped. 422 Bronze loquat 7,5 38 No 3 Low Codominant at base; crown extends under building. 423 Bronze loquat 6,6 38 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; crown lifted. 424 Victorian box 6,5,3,2 50 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base. 425 Victorian box 6,5 35 No 2 Low Codominant at base; suppressed. 426 Victorian box 6,6 38 No 2 Low Codominant at base; suppressed. 427 Bronze loquat 7,6,5,5 72 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; crown lifted. 428 Bronze loquat 6 19 No 3 Low Single stem; close to building; crown lifted. 429 Bronze loquat 7,6,5 57 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; crown lifted; close to building. 430 Victorian box 6,6 38 No 2 Low Codominant at base; dieback. 431 Victorian box 7,5 38 No 2 Low Codominant at base; dieback; poor form and structure. 432 Victorian box 6,6,6,5,5 88 Yes 3 Low Multiple attachments at base; poor form and structure. 433 Southern magnolia 6 19 No 3 Low Multiple attachments at 7'; poor structure. 434 Southern magnolia 7 22 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at 6'; moderate dieback. 435 Bronze loquat 7,6,5,4,3 79 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; crown lifted; close to building. 436 Bronze loquat 5,4,4,4,3 63 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 437 Bronze loquat 5,5,4,3,2,3 69 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 438 Bronze loquat 4,4,4,4,2 57 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 439 Carolina cherry
laurel 4 13 No 3 Low Twig and branch dieback; close to building.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
440 Bronze loquat 7,5 38 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; under building. 441 Bronze loquat 6,6,6 57 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; crown under building eave. 442 Bronze loquat 4,4,3,2 41 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 443 Bronze loquat 5,4,4,3 50 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 444 Bronze loquat 6,5,5,4,2 69 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 445 Bronze loquat 5,2 22 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; one stem removed; close to building. 446 Bronze loquat 7,7 44 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; under building. 447 Bronze loquat 6,6 38 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; under building. 448 Bronze loquat 6,4 31 No 3 Low Codominant at base; under building and very suppressed. 449 Bronze loquat 7,5,5 53 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 450 Bronze loquat 5,5,4,3 53 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 451 Bronze loquat 5,4,4 41 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 452 Bronze loquat 5,4,3,3,3,2 63 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 453 Bronze loquat 5,4,4,3 50 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 454 Bronze loquat 6,5,5 50 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 455 Bronze loquat 6,5,4 47 No 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 456 Southern magnolia 10 31 No 5 High Multiple attachments at 6'; good form and structure; full, dense crown.
457 Southern magnolia 11 35 No 5 High Multiple attachments at 8'; good form and structure; full, dense crown.
458 Bronze loquat 7,7,6,5,4 91 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 459 Bronze loquat 7,6 41 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; close to building. 460 Bronze loquat 7,4 35 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; close to building. 461 Bronze loquat 6,4 31 No 3 Moderate Codominant at base; close to building. 462 Bronze loquat 6,5,5,5,4,4
,4 91 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building.

Tree No. Species Trunk
Diameter
(in.)
Trunk
Cir.
(in.)
Protected
Tree?
Condition
1=poor
5=excellent
Suitability for
Preservation
Comments
Tree Assessment
555 West Middlefield Rd. Mountain
View, CA
October 2024
463 Southern magnolia 13 41 No 5 High Multiple attachments at 7'; good form and structure; full, dense crown.
464 Bronze loquat 8 25 No 3 Moderate Codominant at 6' and 7'; under building eave. 465 Bronze loquat 6,5,5,4,4 75 Yes 3 Moderate Multiple attachments at base; close to building. 466 Southern magnolia 12 38 No 5 High Multiple attachments at 7'; good form and structure; full, dense crown.