ATT 10 - CEQA Categorical Exemption Report — Mountain View City Council, April 28, 2026 (part 1 of 3)

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report
prepared by
City of Mountain View
Community Development | Planning
500 Castro Street, #2
Mountain View, California 94041
Contact: Edgar Maravilla, Senior Planner
prepared with the assistance of
Rincon Consultants, Inc.
99 South Almaden Boulevard
San José, California 95113
September 2025
Attachment 10
Table of Contents
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report i
Table of Contents
1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project Characteristics .................................................................................................................... 2 Existing Site Conditions ....................................................................................................... 2 Project Description .............................................................................................................. 7 3 Consistency Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 11 Criterion (a) ....................................................................................................................... 11 Criterion (b) ....................................................................................................................... 12 Criterion (c) ....................................................................................................................... 13 Criterion (d) ....................................................................................................................... 13

3.4.1 Traffic ................................................................................................................ 13

3.4.2 Noise ................................................................................................................. 16

3.4.3 Air Quality ......................................................................................................... 19

3.4.4 Water Quality ................................................................................................... 21 Criterion (e) ....................................................................................................................... 22 Exceptions to the Exemption ............................................................................................ 24

3.6.1 Cumulative Impacts Criterion ........................................................................... 24

3.6.2 Significant Effect due to Unusual Circumstances ............................................. 24

3.6.3 Scenic Highways ................................................................................................ 25

3.6.4 Hazardous Waste Sites ..................................................................................... 25

3.6.5 Historical Resources .......................................................................................... 25 4 Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 27 5 References .................................................................................................................................... 28 Tables
Table 1 Building Floor Area Composition ....................................................................................... 7 Table 2 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 14 Table 3 Estimated Construction Noise Levels .............................................................................. 16 Table 4 Construction Vibration Levels ......................................................................................... 18 Table 5 BAAQMD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance ............................................................. 19 Table 6 Construction Emissions ................................................................................................... 20 Table 7 Operational Emissions ..................................................................................................... 21 City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

ii
Figures
Figure 1 Regional Project Location .................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2 Project Site Location .......................................................................................................... 4 Figure 3 Photographs of the Project Site ........................................................................................ 5 Figure 4 Proposed Site Plan ............................................................................................................. 8 Figure 5 Proposed Building Renderings .......................................................................................... 9 Appendices
Appendix A Multi-Modal Transportation Analysis
Appendix B Roadway Construction Noise Model
Appendix C Vibration Analysis Worksheets
Appendix D California Emissions Estimator Model Results Appendix E Utility Impact Study
Appendix F Historic Resources Evaluation

Introduction
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 1
1 Introduction
This report serves as the technical documentation of an environmental analysis performed by Rincon Consultants, Inc. for the 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project in the City of Mountain View.

The intent of the analysis is to document whether the project is eligible for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption (CE) pursuant to Section 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The report provides an introduction, project description, and evaluation of the project’s consistency with the requirements for a Class 32 exemption. This includes an analysis of the project’s potential impacts in the areas of biological resources, traffic, air quality, noise, water quality, and historic resources. The report concludes that the project is eligible for a Class 32 exemption.

Public Resources Code Section 21084 requires the CEQA Guidelines to include a list of classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and that are, therefore, exempt from CEQA. Categorically Exempt projects under CEQA fall into several distinct categories. A Class 32 Exemption applies to the proposed project.

The CEQA Guidelines
Section 15332 states that a Class 32 CE is allowed when:
a. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.
c. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

Additionally, CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 outlines exceptions to the applicability of a CE, including cumulative impacts, significant effects due to unusual circumstances, scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, and historical resources. A full listing of these exceptions and an assessment of their applicability to the proposed project is provided in this report. Rincon Consultants, Inc. evaluated the project’s consistency with the Class 32 criteria and the exceptions to the applicability of a CE to confirm the project’s eligibility for the Class 32 exemption.

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

2 2 Project Characteristics
Existing Site Conditions
The project site is a generally flat, irregular-shaped area on the southeast corner of the intersection of Castro Street and West El Camino Real in the downtown area of Mountain View. The site address is commonly referred to as 881 Castro Street, and the site is in the P-19 (Downtown) Precise Plan area. More specifically, the project site encompasses approximately 1.43 acres on six parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 158-06-008, 158-06-010, 158-06-036, 158-06-037, 158-06-038, and 158- 06-039), as well as existing right-of-way for Fairmount Avenue between Castro Street and Hope Street. Figure 1 shows the regional location of the project site, and Figure 2 shows the project site’s location in its local context.

The approximately 1.43-acre site is currently developed with five single-story commercial buildings with retail and office uses and a two-story multifamily residential building. The site also includes landscaping, including approximately 28 on site trees, sidewalks, driveways, surface parking (paved), and utilities, such as overhead electric and telecommunication and belowground sanitary sewer and storm drain. Additionally, the portion of the site consisting of the right-of-way for Fairmount Avenue between Castro Street and Hope Street is developed with the paved road surface of Fairmount Avenue.

The approximately 28 trees on-site are a mix of species, but mostly London plane (Platanus x hispanica), liquidambar (Liquidambar styraciflua), deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara), Hollywood juniper (Juniperus chinensis), and privet (Ligustrum japonicum). Seven of the on-site trees meet the City’s definition of a Heritage Tree. Other existing on-site landscaping consists of shrubs and maintained lawn and flowers, mostly within planters or in spaces between storefronts and sidewalks. There are no naturalized plant communities (e.g., forestland, grassland, chapparal, riparian etc.) within the project site.

Given its downtown location, the project site is surrounded by urban development in all directions.

Gateway Park, a small City park, is adjacent to the southwestern corner of the project site. Office and mixed-use buildings up to four stories tall are west of the site, on the opposite side of Castro Street. Similar development is located to the south of the site, on the opposite side of El Camino Real. Conditions to the east of the project site, on the opposite side of Hope Street, consist of a single-story commercial building and numerous residential buildings up to two stories in height.

Figure 3 shows existing conditions on and around the project site.

Project Characteristics
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 3
Figure 1 Regional Project Location

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

4 Figure 2 Project Site Location

Project Characteristics
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 5
Figure 3 Photographs of the Project Site
Pho
tograph 1. Southerly view from near the intersection of Castro Street and Yosemite Avenue. The project site is visible to the left side of the photo, characterized by retail buildings.

Pho
tograph 2. Easterly view of project site from Castro Street. This photo shows the area of the project site characterized by retail buildings and Fairmont Avenue.

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

6 Photograph 3. Easterly view of the project site from Gateway Park. This area of the project site is characterized by the existing bank and office building.

Photograph 4. Northerly view from internal to the project site near Fairmont Avenue. This area of the project site is characterized by surface parking for existing businesses on-site.

Project Characteristics
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 7
Project Description
The proposed project would involve demolition of existing on-site buildings and development (utilities, sidewalks, roadways, surface parking, etc.) and consolidation of the six parcels comprising the site into a single parcel. Following demolition of existing on-site development and consolidation of the site property, the project applicant would construct an eight-story podium-style building on the project site. The building would include five levels of wood-frame construction over two levels of concrete construction. Additionally, two stories of below-grade parking would be provided. The building rooftop would include photovoltaic solar panels and heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment. The maximum building height would be approximately 103 feet above grade.

The building would be mixed use with a total floor area of approximately 293,756 square feet, providing commercial/retail space and residential units. The ground floor of the building would contain approximately 9,743 square feet of commercial/retail space as well as residential support spaces, such as a leasing office and lobby, utility and storage rooms, a trash room, bike storage room, and coworking space. The ground floor would also contain six residential units. The second through eighth floor of the building would contain residential units, as well as landscaped decks/outdoor open spaces. A total of 140 residential dwelling units would be provided, consisting of a mix of studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and three-bedroom units. Figure 4 shows the conceptual site plan for the ground floor of the building. Table 1 provides a summary of the building floor area composition.

Table 1 Building Floor Area Composition
Use/Space Type Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8 Total Residential Area 8,941 27,317 28, 595 30,141 27,691 27,973 24,239 22,811 199,151 Residential Decks 1,446 3,813 3,993 2,161 4,088 1,388 2,038 1,565 20,647 Landscape Decks 118 336 798 280 303 1,835
Commercial Area 9,743 9,743
Community Room 612 612
Amenity Space 6,428 76 76 569 694 76 1,007 8,622
Utility Area 5,559 1,095 1,095 1,095 1,095 1,095 1,106 1,106 13,246 Circulation Area 2,227 5,462 5,462 5,597 5,178 5,178 5,398 5,398 39,900 Total 34,956 37,805 39,490 40,437 39,026 35,710 34,091 32,323 293,756 Note: All values in table are in square feet
Source: Applicant provided site plans dated May 31, 2024 The project would include pedestrian “paseos,” which are walkable pathways within the project.

The main paseo would be created by converting existing Fairmont Avenue within the project site into a publicly accessible walkable corridor passing through the ground level of the proposed building. The main paseo would include architectural details and various building components such as residential porches, canopies, terraces and balconies along its length. It would be interspersed with outdoor dining elements, benches, cobbled stone walkways, benches and drought tolerant landscaping. The proposed main paseo is shown in Figure 5, which is a conceptual rendering of the proposed project.

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

8 Figure 4 Proposed Site Plan1

Source: Kenneth Rodrigues & Partners, Inc. 2024

1 Ground floor only. Upper floors would consist of standard floor-plan residential units.

Project Characteristics
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 9
Figure 5 Proposed Building Renderings
Pro
posed building from the intersection of Castro Street and El Camino Real Source: Kenneth Rodrigues & Partners, Inc.

Pase
o of proposed building from Castro Street
Source: DES Architects + Engineers

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

10 Circulation and Parking
The proposed building would include a parking garage consisting of two levels of below-grade parking.

Ingress and egress to the parking garage would be from a single driveway on Hope Street, on the east side of the building, as shown on Figure 4. A total of 200 parking spaces would be provided. The provided parking stalls would include 32 spaces for the commercial use, a single commercial loading space, and the remaining parking spaces for building residents.

The building would also provide 164 bicycle spaces, including 14 short-term visitor residential parking spaces, 10 short-term commercial spaces, and 140 long-term spaces. Aside from the ingress/egress ramp into the garage, no vehicle circulation would be provided on the site. All circulation on the project site at street level would be pedestrian and bicycle. The proposed 164 bicycle spaces would exceed the minimum requirement stated in the Municipal Code, which is 154 spaces.

Landscaping
There are approximately 28 trees on the project site (not inclusive of street trees or trees at the gateway park). Approximately 18 of the trees would be removed during project construction. Ten of the onsite trees would be preserved and retained on-site. These existing trees will contribute to the site landscaping. The proposed project would also include planting new trees, as both new street trees and elsewhere on the project site, such as landscape decks and around the main paseo area.

Species used for tree plantings would include cork bark maple (Acer palmatum “Sango Kaku”), western redbud (Cercis occidentalis), Saratoga hybrid laurel (Laurus nobilis “Saratoga”), scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea), blue oak (Quercus douglasii), Brisbane box (Tristania conferta), and chitalpa (xChitalpa tashkentensis). In addition to the tree plantings, the project would include a mix of shrubs and ground cover on residential and landscape decks, as well as within bioretention areas. The main paseo would be lined with planters containing landscaping. Project landscaping would meet the City’s Water Efficient Landscape requirements and would consist of species native to California.

Construction
Project construction would commence with the demolition of existing structures and development on the project site. Construction fencing would be installed at the site perimeter as indicated on the approved site plan and where possible placing the construction fencing at the back of the existing sidewalk to maintain pedestrian circulation. Hope Street between El Camino Real and Fairmont Avenue would be used for construction ingress and egress to the site solely off of El Camino Real, but would remain open to vehicles during construction. All staging of construction toilets, dumpsters, and trade contractor job containers would remain within the construction fencing perimeter. Tree protection fencing would be installed around existing trees to be preserved and retained. Project construction would require the removal of approximately 31 trees inclusive of onsite trees and street trees, some of which meet the City’s definition of a Heritage Tree. All trees at Gateway Park and located on adjacent private properties would be maintained and not damaged by the project.

Construction would occur Monday through Friday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.

Construction is not planned on weekends. If weekend construction were to become necessary, no construction would occur on Sundays, and Saturday construction would require City approval.

Construction would last for approximately 30 months. Equipment would include water trucks, skip loaders, forklifts, dump trucks, concrete pumps and trucks, cranes, and trailers, among other pieces of typical equipment. Equipment would be staged and stored on the project site. A total of approximately 42,750 cubic yards of soil material would be exported from the site during construction, primarily the result of the proposed below-grade parking.

Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 11
3 Consistency Analysis
Criterion (a)
The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.

According to the City’s General Plan, the land use designation of most of the project site is Downtown Mixed-Use, with a small area designated as Medium Density Residential. Within the Downtown Mixed-Use land use designation, development is guided by the Downtown Precise Plan.

According to the Downtown Precise Plan, the project site is within Area J of the plan area, which is called “East of Castro Street Frontage” (City of Mountain View 2024) Within Area J most commercial and retail uses are permitted, including restaurants without drive-through facilities. Residential is a provisional use on upper floors of buildings at a maximum density of 50 dwelling units per acre.

Maximum height in Area J is four stories or 55 feet, whichever is less, along Castro Street. Maximum height along Hope Street is three stories or 35 feet, whichever is less. All parking in Area J must be provided on-site and surface parking is strongly discouraged (City of Mountain View 2024). The Medium Density Residential land use designation allows for a mix of single- and multi-family housing with a density of 13 to 25 dwelling units per acre.

Pursuant to the Mountain View Municipal Code, the project site is zoned Planned Community/Precise Plan. Specifically, the P-19 Precise Plan, according to Section 36.22.05 of the Municipal Code, the Planned Community/Precise Plan is designed to provide for those uses or combinations of uses which may be appropriately developed as a planned area development. There are no height, area, or yard requirements in the zoning district except as may be imposed by the applicable precise plan or as conditions upon the granting of a planned community permit (Mountain View Municipal Code Section 36.22.20). According to Mountain View Municipal Code Section 36.22.30, a planned community permit is required except as specified in an applicable precise plan prior to the development of any use within a Planned Community district, other than crop and tree farming. The permit must set forth with particularity the nature of each use to be permitted and define the location and extent of each such permitted use by reference to a map or maps attached to the permit.

The project applicant is requesting a planned community permit pursuant to Mountain View Municipal Code Section 36.22.30. The issuance of a planned community permit is consistent with the General Plan designation because the Downtown Mixed-Use land use designation is guided by the Downtown Precise Plan. Additionally, the project would be consistent with the overall land use policies specified in the Downtown Precise Plan, including:
 Concentrate pedestrian-oriented uses along Castro Street and cross streets and extending one block on either side of Castro Street.

Project Consistency: The project would improve the existing sidewalk along its frontage of Castro Street with new landscaping and landscaping amenities, such as benches and tables.

The main paseo would provide a pedestrian connection extending one block east of Castro Street to Hope Street.

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

12  Focus new office development on the 400 blocks of Castro Street and in Area I.

Project Consistency: The proposed project does not include office development. But it may allow for office development with approval of a Conditional Use Permit.  Focus new residential development in the Transition Areas and in mixed-use projects.

Project Consistency: The proposed project is a mixed-use project.  Ensure that sufficient and well-designed parking is provided for all new development.

Maintain and encourage convenient parking for all uses.

Project Consistency: The proposed project would exceed parking requirements. Parking would be provided in a below-grade parking garage.
 Preserve and enhance existing residential neighborhoods in and near downtown, including linking surrounding residential neighborhoods to the downtown core with attractive street improvements and pedestrian connection.

Project Consistency: The project would include improve the existing sidewalk along its frontage of Castro Street, El Camino Real, and Hope Street with new landscaping and landscaping amenities, such as benches and tables. The main paseo would provide a pedestrian connection between the commercial uses on Castro Street and the residential neighborhood along Hope Street.

As allowed per state legislation, specifically the incentives concession and waivers per the State Density Bonus Law and AB 1287, the proposed project is consistent with the development standards for Area J in the Downtown Precise Plan. The planned community permit that must be obtained for the project would allow for the project to be constructed compliant with the State’s density bonus program and AB 1287.

In summary, projects in Downtown Mixed-Use land use designation must be consistent with the Downtown Precise Plan. In order for the proposed project to proceed, the project applicant must obtain a planned community permit pursuant to Section 36.22 of the Mountain View Municipal Code. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the applicable General Plan land use designation and policies, as well as the applicable zoning regulations. The project would meet the requirements of criterion (a).

Criterion (b)
The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

The proposed project is at the corner of the intersection of Castro Street and El Camino Real, which is within the limits of the City of Mountain View. The project site is comprised of six parcels with a combined total area of approximately 1.43 acres. The location of the project site is in the downtown area of Mountain View. Urban uses surround the project site in all directions for numerous blocks.

Therefore, the project would occur within city limits on a site of less than five acres that is surrounded by urban uses. The proposed project would meet the requirements of criterion (b).

Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 13
Criterion (c)
The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.

The project site is located within a highly developed urban area that lacks habitat that would be suitable for sensitive animal or plant species. The project site is developed with five single-story commercial buildings with retail and office uses and a two-story multifamily residential building.

Paved surface parking and roadway surface are also present within the project site.

A search of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system concluded that the project site does not contain critical habitats (USFWS 2024a). The IPaC system identified 13 endangered, rare, or threatened species known to occur in the general area. The identified species are associated with open water, marsh, and vernal pool habitat, as well as eucalyptus trees. Given the developed and urban conditions of the project site, as well as distance from required habitats (e.g., open water, cliffs, brackish marsh, etc.), the proposed project would have no impacts on these species or their habitat. Kielty Arborist Services prepared an arborist report for the project in May 5, 2025. The arborist report is included in the site plan set for the project. According to the arborists report, there are 28 existing trees on-site. Because the trees are located in areas of high human activity and presence (i.e., downtown), and are isolated from forestlands, natural water bodies, and other natural habitat, they do not provide structure or habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened birds or other species. Although the on-site trees are not habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened bird species, if removal occurs during the migratory nesting season, a preconstruction nesting survey would be required pursuant to the City’s Standard Condition of Approval, Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey.

Add
itionally, the project site does not contain special-stat us plant and wildlife taxa recognized on
the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Online Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants of California (CNPS 2024) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, And Rare Plants of California (California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2024). The project site is located within a developed area that lacks habitat that would be suitable for endangered, rare, or threatened species.

Due
to the developed nature of the project site and surrounding areas, the project site does not have value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Therefore, the proposed project would meet the requirements of criterion (c).

Criterion (d)
Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

The following discussion provides an analysis of the project’s potential effects with respect to traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality.

3.4.1 Traffic
Trip Generation
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. prepared a Multi-Modal Transportation Analysis (MTA) for the proposed project, which is included as Appendix A to this report. As discussed in the MTA, City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

14 Hexagon calculated the gross project trips and net project trips that would be expected from operation of the project. The gross project trips are the new vehicle trips that the project would generate without accounting for the existing vehicle trips to and from the project site that would no longer occur after existing on-site land uses are demolished. Net project trips are the total new trips that would after existing trips are subtracted from the gross project trips. Project operational vehicle trip generation rates were based on trip rates for Multifamily Housing Not Close to Rail Transit/Mid-Rise (Land Use Code 221) and Strip Retail Plaza (Land Use Code 822) from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 11
th Edition. The number of vehicle trips that
occur from existing on-site uses was based on driveway counts conducted on September 24, 2024.

The following trip reductions were applied to the trip generation rates consistent with Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) guidance: 1) residential/retail internal trip reduction; 2) transit trip reduction; and 3) pass-by retail trip reduction. The first trip reduction assumes that the mixed-use element of the project would allow residents to walk to retail uses, avoiding the need to use vehicles. The second reduction assumes that some transit use would occur because there is a major bus stop within 2,000 feet of the project site. The third trip reduction assumes that some trips generated from the commercial component of the project would be trips that occur regardless, such as people already driving past the site who decide to stop and visit a retail shop.

As shown in Table 2, the gross project trips resulting from the project is expected to be 836 daily vehicle trips, and when the existing 230 daily trips from on-site uses are subtract, a net total of 606 daily vehicle trips. Table 2 also shows net new trips during morning rush hour (AM peak hour) and evening rush hour (PM peak hour). AM peak hour is defined as 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and PM peak hour is defined as 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM.

Table 2 Trip Generation
Land Use Size Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Mid-Rise Multifamily Residential 140 units 636 12 40 52 33 22 55 -Residential/Retail Internal Capture Reduction (15%) - 80 -1 -2 -3 -4 -4 -8 -Transit Reduction (2%) -11 0 -1 -1 -1 0 -1
Sub-Total Residential 545 11 37 48 28 18 46
Retail 9,743 square feet 532 14 9 23 32 32 64
-Residential/Retail Internal Capture Reduction (15%) - 80 -2 -1 -3 -4 -4 -8 -Pass-By Reduction (30%) -136 0 0 0 -8 -9 -17
Sub-Total Retail 316 12 8 20 20 19 39
Gross Proposed Trips 861 23 45 68 48 37 85
Existing Uses 230 14 4 18 11 17 28
Net Project Trips 631 9 41 50 37 20 57
Notes:

1. Residential/retail internal trip reductions were applied to the project per the 2014 Santa Clara VTA Guidelines.

2. Pursuant to VTA Guidelines, a transit trip reduction is applied because the site is within 2,000 feet of a major bus stop.

3. Pass-by trip reduction is based on maximum allowable pass-by trip reduction rate in the VTA Guidelines for the peak hour.

Source: Appendix A
Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 15
Vehicle Miles Traveled
Pursuant to Senate Bill 743, transportation impacts should be measured using vehicle miles travelled (VMT) instead of the previously used Level of Service (LOS) (California Office of Planning and Research [OPR] 2018). Reducing VMT is an effective climate strategy and is intended to decrease greenhouse gas emissions associated with the transportation sector while increasing benefits to human health.

The City’s VMT policy establishes certain projects that are presumed to have a less than significant impact per the CEQA guidance and do not require a VMT analysis. Among the types of projects presumed to have a less than significant impact includes residential and employment projects located in areas of low VMT, defined as exhibiting VMT that is 15 percent or greater below the existing nine-county Bay Area regional reference average VMT. Reference average VMT per capita or per employee are obtained from VMT.

As part of the MTA, Hexagon obtained the most current reference average VMT per capita, which is

13.95 miles per capita (Appendix A). When the 13.95 is multiplied by 15 percent, the resultant threshold for less than significant impacts is 11.86 miles per capita. According to the MTA, without the proposed project, existing VMT in the project area is 11.28 miles per capita, which is below the threshold of 11.86. With the addition of the project, VMT per capita is 11.04, which is also below the threshold. Because VMT in the area, including with the proposed project, would be below the threshold of 11.86 miles per capita, impacts would be less than significant.

Site Access
Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via a new driveway on Hope Street between Fairmont Avenue and El Camino Real. Based on the Mountain View Municipal Code (Section

36.32.80), two-way driveways should be a minimum of 18 feet, with no maximum requirement. The project’s driveway would be 25 feet wide, which would satisfy the City’s requirements. There would be adequate site access.

Construction Traffic
Construction would occur within the hours the City allows for construction activities. Specifically, the City’s Municipal Code Section 8.70, allows for construction Monday through Friday between 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and no construction activity on Saturday and Sunday. Buildout of the proposed project would not involve road closures that would significantly affect emergency vehicle access or create significant hazards to bicycles and pedestrians. Construction trips would generally be staggered throughout the day, with most trips occurring during off-peak hours. Furthermore, construction traffic impacts are temporary by their nature and would have no effect on traffic and circulation beyond the construction period.

Conclusion
Based on the assessment of traffic impacts and site access above, there would be no significant impacts related to transportation or traffic.

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

16 3.4.2 Noise
The primary existing source of noise in the project site vicinity is motor vehicle traffic, including automobiles, trucks, buses, and motorcycles. As collector streets, El Camino Real and Castro Street produce noise from vehicles. Traffic on Hope Street and Fairmont Avenue also contribute to existing noise levels in the project area. Other noise sources include typical urban activities, such as car horns, people talking, and landscape maintenance equipment (e.g., mowers, leaf blowers, etc.) Construction of the project would have the potential to create noise levels above ambient noise conditions on a temporary basis. The project would result in temporary noise level increases during site preparation, grading, paving, building, and architectural coating activities. Construction noise would typically be higher during the more equipment-intensive phases of initial construction (i.e., demolition, site preparation and grading work) and would be lower during the later construction phases (i.e., building construction and paving). This is because earlier construction phases typically involve the loudest equipment, such as dozers and dump trucks.

To determine construction noise impacts, noise was estimated at residences closest to the project site using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) Version 1.1, shown in Table 3. Over the course of a typical construction day, construction equipment would be located as close as 85 feet to the nearest residential and park use. This construction would typically be located at an average distance further away over an 8-hour period due to the nature of construction where equipment is mobile throughout the day. Table 3 shows the construction noise levels attributable to each construction phase modeled at nearby residential receptors.

Table 3 Estimated Construction Noise Levels
Construction Phase
Estimated Noise Levels (dBA Leq)
RCNM Reference
Noise Level
(50 feet)
Single-Family
Residence
to the North
(85 feet)
Gateway Park
to the South
(85 feet)
Single-Family
Residence
to the East
(160 feet)
Demolition 80 75 75 70
Site Preparation 81 76 76 71
Grading 84 79 79 74
Building Construction 75 70 70 65
Paving 75 70 70 65
Roadway Construction Noise Model data sheets and assumptions are included in Appendix B.

The Federal Transit Administration has established 80 dBA Leq (8-hour) as the threshold for construction noise at residential land uses (Federal Transit Administration 2018). As shown in Table 3, noise levels at the nearest residential uses to the north would not exceed the FTA’s residential construction noise threshold of 80 dBA Leq (8-hour). In addition, construction would occur within the hours the City allows for construction activities. Specifically, the City’s Municipal Code Section 8.70, allows for construction Monday through Friday between 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and no construction activity on Saturday and Sunday. These are the hours and days when many people are away from their residences and at work or school. These are also daytime hours when fewer people tend to sleep, and noise is less obtrusive. Therefore, project construction noise impacts would be less than significant.

Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 17
The primary on-site operational noise source from the project would be from mechanical equipment such as HVAC units. This analysis assumes the use of a typical HVAC system for multi- family residential sites, which is a 2.5-ton Carrier 24ABA4030 air conditioner with Puron refrigerant that has a sound power level of 76 dBA, which is equivalent to a sound pressure level (SPL) of 68 dBA Leq. To provide a reasonable worst-case (i.e., loudest) analysis, two HVAC units operating simultaneously were modeled at the same location on the proposed roof approximately 30 feet from the residential land use to the north, which is the nearest sensitive receptor to the project.

Accounting for the 30-foot distance between the proposed HVAC units and the residential property line to the north and the proposed 6-foot parapet wall on the roof’s edge, shown in the architectural plans for this project (Kenneth Rodrigues 2024) (which would provide at least an estimated noise reduction of 5 dBA), noise generated by the project’s HVAC equipment would attenuate to approximately 46 dBA Leq at the adjacent residential property line to the north. All other sensitive receptors would be located at a further distance away and therefore, project generated noise would lower at those locations. As stated in the City’s Municipal Code Section

21.26(a) (MVMC 2024), noise generated by the project’s HVAC equipment would not exceed the City’s nighttime noise limit of 50 dBA at the receiving residential property line to the north, and impacts would be less than significant.

Additional on-site noise sources such as landscape maintenance and conversations would be typical of noise generated by neighboring land uses and would not substantially contribute to overall ambient noise levels. Therefore, on-site project operations would have a less than significant impact.

The project’s increase in traffic noise was estimated by adding the project daily trip generation (see Table 2) to the existing average daily traffic (ADT) volume on the surrounding roadways according to Replica’s modeled data about activity in the built environment (Replica 2023). The addition of 606 daily vehicle trips associated with project operation would result in an increase in traffic noise that would be up to approximately 0.4 dBA L
dn. Although the City does not have specific noise level criteria for assessing traffic noise impacts. The following thresholds of significance are similar to those recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (FICON 2020), which use criteria
based on transportation noise increases and are commonly applied to roadway traffic noise analyses under CEQA. A significant impact would occur if traffic noise increases the existing noise environment by the following:
 Greater than 1.5 dBA L
dn for ambient noise environments of 65 dBA Ldn and higher.  Greater than 3 dBA Ldn for ambient noise environments of 60 to 64 Ldn.  Greater than 5 dBA Ldn for ambient noise environments of less than 60 dBA Ldn.

Based on the ambient noise measurements recorded on October 21, 2024, by Rincon Consultants, the existing ambient noise level near the southeast corner of the project site, at the intersection of W. El Camino Real (I-82) and Hope Street is 75 dBA L
dn at 50 feet. A significant impact would occur if
project-related traffic increases the 75 dBA Ldn ambient noise environment of noise-sensitive locations by 1.5 dBA Ldn or more (FICON 2020). As the project would result in a traffic noise increase

0.4 dBA Ldn, the project’s traffic noise increase would not exceed 1.5 dBA Ldn or more. Additionally, traffic noise level increases on other surrounding roadways would be a smaller increase. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

18 Groundborne Vibration
The project does not include any substantial vibration sources associated with operation. Therefore, construction activities have the greatest potential to generate groundborne vibration affecting nearby receptors, especially during grading and excavation of the project site. According to the project applicant, impact pile driving is not proposed. Foundation piles would be drilled and set.

Rubber-tire loaders would be used when within close distances to nearby buildings.

Table 4
identifies vibration velocity levels at the nearby sensitive receptors for the various types of equipment that would operate during project construction. As shown in Table 4, as the multi-family residential building to the north is the closest building to the proposed project, specific distances have been implemented as a construction best management practice for consideration of potential vibration levels.

Table 4 Construction Vibration Levels
Equipment
in/sec PPV
Reference Level
Residences to the North
(864 Hope Street)
Adjacent Commercial
Building to the North
(821 Castro Street)
Distance (feet) 25 30 15
Large Bulldozer 0.089 0.068 0.191
Drill Rig 0.089 0.068 0.191
Loaded Trucks 0.076 0.058 0.164
Small Bulldozer 0.003 0.002 0.006
Distance (feet) 25 70 140
Vibratory Roller 0.210 0.045 0.016
FTA Threshold for Building Damage 0.2 0.3
Threshold Exceeded? No No
PPV = peak particle velocity; in/sec = inches per second Vibration analysis worksheets are included in Appendix C.

Source: Federal Transit Administration 2018.

The city does not have a quantified threshold against which to assess vibration impacts during construction and operation. Therefore, the Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (Federal Transit Administration 2018) was used to evaluate potential construction vibration impacts related to potential building damage. Construction vibration impacts facilitated by the project would be significant if vibration levels exceed the Federal Transit Administration’s criteria shown in Table 4. For example, impacts would be significant if vibration levels exceed 0.2 in/sec PPV at residential structures, and 0.3 in/sec PPV at commercial structures. This is the limit where minor cosmetic (i.e., non-structural) damage may occur to these buildings. Therefore, for a conservative analysis to these buildings, construction vibration impacts would be significant if vibration levels exceed 0.2 in/sec PPV at nearby residential buildings or 0.3 in/sec PPV at nearby commercial buildings.

Based on the information presented in
Table 4, vibration levels from a large bulldozer would be up to approximately 0.191 in/sec PPV at the commercial building adjacent to the north and 0.068 in/sec PPV at the residential building to the north. Therefore, construction vibration would not Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 19
exceed the 0.3 in/sec PPV threshold for structural damage to nearby commercial structures or the

0.2 in/sec PPV threshold for residential buildings and impacts would be less than significant.

Conclusion
Based on the assessment of the temporary and long-term increase in noise and groundborne vibration there would be no significant impacts related to noise.

3.4.3 Air Quality
A significant adverse air quality impact may occur when a project individually or cumulatively interferes with progress toward the attainment of the ozone standard by releasing emissions that equal or exceed the established long-term quantitative thresholds for pollutants or causes an exceedance of a state or federal ambient air quality standard for a criteria pollutant or pollutants.

Primary criteria pollutants are emitted directly from a source (e.g., vehicle tailpipe, an exhaust stack of a factory, etc.) into the atmosphere. Commonly found primary criteria pollutants include reactive organic gases (ROG), nitric oxides (NO
x), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). PM 10 is particulate matter measuring no more than 10 microns in diameter, while PM2.5 is fine particulate matter measuring no more than 2.5 microns in diameter.

Significance Thresholds
Because the project site is located within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) and falls under the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), this air quality analysis conforms to the methodologies recommended in the BAAQMD’s 2022 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines (BAAQMD 2022).

The following significance thresholds have been recommended by the BAAQMD for construction- related air quality impacts and project operation-related air quality impacts. For the purposes of this analysis, the project would result in a significant impact if construction or operational emissions would exceed any of the thresholds shown in Table 5.

Table 5 BAAQMD Air Quality Thresholds of Significance
Pollutant/Precursor
Construction: Average Daily
Emissions (lbs/day)
Operation: Average Daily
Emissions (lbs/day)
Operation: Maximum Annual
Emissions (tpy)
ROG 54 54 10
NOX 54 54 10
PM10 82 (exhaust) 82 15
PM2.5 54 (exhaust) 54 10
lbs/day = pounds per day; tpy = tons per year; ROG = reactive organic gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; PM10 = respirable particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers or less.; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less
Source: BAAQMD 2022
City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

20 Methodology
The air pollutant emissions generated by project construction and operation were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2022.1. CalEEMod uses project- specific information, including the project’s land uses, square footage for different uses (e.g., residential, commercial, townhouses), and location, to model a project’s construction and operational emissions. The analysis reflects the construction and operation of the project as described under Section 2, Project Description. User-defined inputs were used where possible, based on information supplied by the project applicant. The CalEEMod output report is provided as Appendix D to this report.

Construction Emissions
Development of the proposed project would involve parking pavement demolition, site grading, excavation, new building construction, and other construction-related activities that have the potential to generate substantial air pollutant emissions. Temporary construction emissions from these activities were estimated using CalEEMod, based on the gross amount of proposed new residential space. Table 6 shows the maximum daily construction emissions.

Table 6 Construction Emissions
Year
Maximum Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
ROG NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 SOX
2025 0.40 3.48 11.6 0.51 0.17 0.02
2026 1.80 13.6 26.6 2.29 0.83 0.05
2027 1.79 15.9 30.7 2.84 1.00 0.06
2028 1.29 9.92 14.2 1.74 0.63 0.02
Maximum Construction Emissions 1.80 15.9 30.7 2.84 1.00 0.06 Average Daily Construction Emissions 1.20 9.79 16.0 1.67 0.61 0.03 BAAQMD Thresholds 54 54 N/A 82 54 N/A
Threshold Exceeded? No No N/A No No N/A
See Appendix D for CalEEMod worksheets; emission data presented is the highest of winter or summer outputs N/A = not applicable; lbs/day = pounds per day; ROG = reactive organic gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; CO = Carbon Monoxide; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less; PM10 = respirable particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers or less; SOx = oxides of sulfur.

No BAAQMD threshold for CO or SOX,
As shown in Table 6, the estimated construction emissions of the project would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would result in no significant air quality impacts.

Operational Emissions
Long-term operational emissions associated with the proposed project are those associated with vehicle trips (mobile emissions), the use of electricity (energy), and consumer products and architectural coatings (area source emissions) upon buildout of the project. Total operational emissions are shown in Table 7.

Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 21
Table 7 Operational Emissions
Sources
Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day)
ROG NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 SOX
Total Operational Emissions 11.5 3.72 33.5 5.15 1.44 0.06 BAAQMD Thresholds 54 54 N/A 82 54 N/A
Threshold Exceeded? No No N/A No No N/A
See Appendix D for CalEEMod worksheets; emission data presented is the highest of winter or summer outputs N/A = not applicable; lbs/day = pounds per day; ROG = reactive organic gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; CO = Carbon Monoxide; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less; PM10 = respirable particulate matter with an aerodynamic resistance diameter of 10 micrometers or less; SOx = oxides of sulfur.

No BAAQMD threshold for CO or SOX,
Conclusion
Construction and operational emissions would not exceed BAAQMD thresholds for any criteria pollutant and would comply with BAAQMD criteria pollutant thresholds. The proposed project would not result in individually or cumulatively significant impacts to air quality. This impact would be less than significant.

3.4.4 Water Quality
Urban runoff can have a variety of deleterious effects on water quality and water resources (United States Environmental Protection Agency 2024). Oil and grease contain a number of hydrocarbon compounds, some of which are toxic to aquatic organisms at low concentrations. Heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, and copper are the most common metals found in urban stormwater runoff.

These metals can be toxic to aquatic organisms and have the potential to contaminate drinking water supplies. Additionally, potential runoff may occur during construction, as stormwater runoff leaving construction sites can carry sediments, construction debris, oil, and chemicals off site.

Runoff during operation may occur as landscaping chemicals and impervious surface debris may be carried off site by stormwater.

As part of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has established regulations under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program to control both construction and operation stormwater discharges. In the Bay Area, the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) administers the NPDES permitting program and is responsible for developing permitting requirements. The proposed project would be subject to the San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP) – NPDES Permit Order No. R2-2015-0049, and all provisions set forth in Section C.3, New Development and Redevelopment.

Under the conditions of the permitting program, the project applicant would be required to eliminate or reduce non-stormwater discharges into storm drain systems and watercourses and adhere to best management practices (BMPs) for stormwater management during project construction (RWQCB 2015). The proposed project would disturb at least one acre of land, and therefore must obtain and adhere to a General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (2009-0009-DWQ General Permit). As part of this permit, the applicant must implement a construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that contains BMPs and control measures to implement during construction to avoid erosion and release of construction materials and fluids. Stormwater pollutant control measures that should be City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

22 incorporated in this plan include erosion control, run-on and runoff control, sediment control, advanced treatment as appropriate, site management, and non-stormwater management through all construction phases. Implementation of the SWPPP and adherence to the NPDES General Permit, which is required pursuant to Mountain View Municipal Code Section 8.20.36, would prevent significant impacts on water quality as a result of project construction.

The Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP) Order No. R2-2015-0049 permits stormwater discharges from municipal separate sewer systems (MS4s), pursuant to NPDES regulations (RWQCB 2015). Section C.3 of the MRP, New Development and Redevelopment, addresses post-construction stormwater requirements for new development projects that add and/or replace more than 10,000 square feet of impervious area. As the proposed project would replace more than 10,000 square feet of impervious area within the project site, it must comply with the provisions by the RWQCB in Section C.3. Thus, the proposed project must implement source control requirements to minimize stormwater pollutants in urban runoff, site design and stormwater treatment requirements that limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems and minimize impacts from stormwater and urban runoff on the biological integrity of water bodies, and sizing criteria for stormwater treatment systems (RWQCB 2015).

According to the Conceptual Development Stormwater Treatment Plan (Plan Sheet C-6.0, dated May 15, 2025), the impervious area on the project site would decrease as a result of the proposed project. This is to say that during operation of the proposed project there would be more area on the project site where water is able to infiltrate the ground than compared with existing on-site conditions. Nonetheless, the proposed project would result in approximately 49,106 square feet of impervious surface on the project site. Stormwater runoff from impervious surfaces would flow to bioretention filters that slow and treat runoff before discharge. Furthermore, the applicant must prepare a Stormwater Management Plan that conforms with MRP Order No. R2-2015-0049. The proposed project’s Stormwater Management Plan must be designed to handle stormwater via flow- based methods, based on the C.3. Stormwater Handbook. In accordance with the C.3 requirements, the project would be designed to direct runoff from roofs and sidewalks into vegetated areas, which are already included in the proposed project. Additionally, the Stormwater Management Plan includes routine maintenance activities for the planned bioretention areas. For these reasons, operation of the proposed project would not result in significant water quality impacts.

Conclusion
The proposed project would not increase impermeable surfaces on the site. The project would comply with the NPDES General Permit and MRP, and the Mountain View Municipal Code, specifically Section 8. Therefore, the impacts related to water quality would be less than significant.

Criterion (e)
The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

Public utilities include “wet” utilities, such as water and wastewater treatment, and “dry” utilities, such as electricity and solid waste diversion and disposal. The project would be located in an urban area served by existing public utilities. The existing on-site uses, consisting of commercial and residential uses, generate demand for utilities. For example, these uses consume water and generate wastewater that requires treatment before discharge to surface waters. The proposed project would increase the demand for water and for wastewater treatment because it would redevelop the site at a greater density than existing conditions. In order to assess the adequacy of Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 23
wet utilities, a Utility Impact Study was prepared for the project by Schaaf and Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers in October 2024 (see Appendix E).

According to the Utility Impact Study, water demand from existing uses on the project site is approximately 2,578 gallons per day (GPD). The Utility Impact Study also provides the future cumulative water demand, which is based on the City’s future planned infrastructure and future planned land use and growth. The future cumulative water demand for the project site is 6,638 GPD. Water demand resulting from the proposed project would be approximately 20,501 GPD, exceeding existing water demand by approximately 17,923 GPD and future cumulative demand by approximately 13,863 GPD. The Utility Impact Study concluded that there would be sufficient potable water capacity to serve the project in combination with existing and future cumulative demand. The Utility Impact Study also determined that existing water infrastructure (water mains, fire hydrants, fire pipeline, etc.) would be sufficient for the project in combination with both existing and future cumulative demand.

According to the Utility Impact Study, the incremental difference in base wastewater flow with the project would be approximately 13,608 GPD greater than the base wastewater flow under existing conditions and approximately 11,054 GPD greater than the future cumulative conditions.

The Utility Impact Study determined that there would be no deficiencies along the project wastewater conveyance pathway in the existing condition or in the future cumulative condition. The project would not contribute to any additional deficiencies in the wastewater system.

Electricity is currently provided throughout Mountain View, including the project site, by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Electric would be provided to the proposed project with connections to existing infrastructure owner by PG&E that currently serve the downtown area, including the project site.

Solid waste collection service in Mountain View is provided by Recology. Accordingly, Recology would provide solid waste collection service for the proposed project, consistent with its ongoing collection services for most of the existing uses on the project site. Recology also provides recycling diversion and collection of organics (i.e., compost material). The proposed project would be adequately served by solid waste services.

Fire protection services in Mountain View are provided by the City of Mountain View Fire Department, which has five locations throughout the City. Fire Station #1, located at 251 S.

Shoreline Boulevard, is approximately 0.8 mile from and closest to the project site. Law enforcement and police services in Mountain View are provided by the Mountain View Police Department. The Mountain View Police Department currently provides police services to the project site. The proposed project would not require an expansive of the service area of the City of Mountain View Fire Department or the Mountain View Police Department. The proposed project would be adequately served by fire protection, law enforcement, and police services.

The proposed project would be adequately served by utilities and public services. Therefore, the project would meet the requirements of criterion (e).

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

24 Exceptions to the Exemption
CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 outlines exceptions to the applicability of a CE, including cumulative impacts, significant effects due to unusual circumstances, scenic highways, hazardous waste sites, and historical resources. These exceptions are discussed below. As shown, none of the exceptions would apply.

3.6.1 Cumulative Impacts Criterion
CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 states that “all exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.” There are no other or additional projects planned on the project site other than the proposed project described in Section 2.2, Project Description. Therefore, there are no successive projects in the same place as the proposed project.

There are several projects proximate to the project site that are currently working through the City’s entitlement process (i.e., permits) or recently completed the process, including a new condominium building at 99 Hope Street and a new mixed-use development at 749 West El Camino Real. Both of these projects are on opposite sides of streets adjacent to the project site (City of Mountain View n.d.). If construction of these projects overlap the construction phase of the proposed project, there could be cumulative construction impacts, such as noise from construction equipment operating simultaneously on the project site and at one or more of the other proximate projects. However, noise is measured in decibels, which are on a logarithmic scale. For this reason, two sounds of similar levels, such as two dump trucks operating close to one another, do not double the sound level at nearby receptors. Likewise, other projects of the same type, such as the two projects proximate to the project site would be required to comply with the City’s construction hours (Municipal Code Section 8.70). Similarly, these other projects would be required to implement BMPs and runoff controls during construction to prevent adverse water quality impacts.

Operation of the projects at 99 Hope Street and 749 West El Camino Real would likely overlap with operation of the proposed project. This would result in a cumulative increase in demand for utility services, such as potable water and wastewater treatment. As discussed in Section 3.5, Criterion (e), the Utility Impact Study prepared for the project determined that existing water and wastewater infrastructure would be sufficient for the project in combination with both existing and future cumulative demand (Appendix E). Similarly, the MTA for the project also considered future planned conditions and determined impacts would be less than significant (Appendix A).

In summary, planned projects of the same type on parcels surrounding the project site would have environmental impacts, such as temporary construction noise impacts, but when combined with the proposed project impacts would not result in significant environmental impacts. Therefore, no significant cumulative impact would result from successive projects of the same type in the same place over time. This exception to a CE does not apply to the proposed project.

3.6.2 Significant Effect due to Unusual Circumstances
CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 states that “a categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.” As discussed under the Existing Site Conditions section above, the project site has been developed with existing structures. Additionally, the project would be generally consistent with the surrounding land uses. As described under Section 4.4, Criterion (d), Consistency Analysis
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 25
above, the project would not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, water quality, or utilities and public services, and there are no unusual circumstances at the project site which would exacerbate environmental effects. The project site is generally flat and does not possess characteristics which would qualify as unusual circumstances under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2. Therefore, there are no known unusual circumstances at the project site or related to project operations that would create a reasonable possibility of significant effects to the environment. This exception would not apply to the project.

3.6.3 Scenic Highways
CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 states that a CE “shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway.” The project site is not on, near or prominently visible from an officially designated California Scenic Highway.

The nearest designated California Scenic Highway is Interstate 280 north of Stanford University (Caltrans 2019), which is approximately 6 miles from the project site and separated by many buildings, rolling topography, and other visual obstructions. Therefore, this exception to a CE is not applicable to the proposed project.

3.6.4 Hazardous Waste Sites
CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 states that a CE “shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.” Rincon Consultants conducted a search of the EnviroStor environmental database and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites (Cortese) List on October 31, 2024. The records review indicated that the project site is not located on a site included on a list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code (Department of Toxic Substances Control 2024). Additionally, a search on the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Geotracker indicated that the project site was not located on a cleanup site. Accordingly, the project site is not on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

Therefore, this exception does not apply to the project.

3.6.5 Historical Resources
CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 states that a CE “shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” Given that the project site is located in the downtown area of Mountain View where buildings often date to the historic era, the City retained Rincon Consultants to conduct a historic resources evaluation. The Historic Resources Evaluation, dated December 16, 2024, is included as Appendix F to this report, and provides details of the methodology and results of the evaluation. Briefly, through the evaluation it was determined that no historical or known archaeological resources occur within or adjacent to the project site. Existing buildings on the project site are recommended as not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historical Resources, or local registers based on applicable eligibility criteria.

The project site has been previously disturbed during grading for and construction of the existing buildings and surface parking, in which event belowground archaeological resources would have likely been uncovered, if present. However, the project would require excavation to depths exceeding prior disturbance. There is no known archaeological sensitivity at the project site or at City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

26 these depths. Nonetheless, compliance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code would be required. This section of the California Health and Safety Code states that in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site of any nearby areas. Additionally, ff prehistoric or historic-period cultural materials are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, work within 100 feet of the find would be halted until a qualified archaeologist and Native American representative can assess the significance of the find pursuant to the City’s standard Condition of Approval, Discovery of Archaeological Resources.

As archaeological resources are not known to be present and the project site and the City’s standard Condition of Approval would apply to unanticipated discoveries, and existing buildings on the site do not qualify as historical resources as defined by CEQA Section 15064.5(a), the project would not result in a potentially significant adverse impact or change in the significance of a historic resource as defined by CEQA. Therefore, this exception does not apply to the project.

Summary
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 27
4 Summary
Based on this analysis, the proposed 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project meets the criteria for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, exceptions to the applicability of a CE, as specified in Section 15300.2(a) through (f) of the CEQA Guidelines, do not apply to the project. Therefore, the proposed project is exempt from CEQA.

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

28 5 References
Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2022. California Environmental Quality Act Thresholds and Guidelines Update. Retrieved on December 29, 2024, from https://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/planning-and-research/ceqa/ceqa-guidelines- 2022/ceqa-guidelines-chapter-0-cover-page-
pdf.pdf?rev=f250e4ab435c491ba2afcbe299590a67&sc_lang=en California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2024. EnviroStor Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List [map database]. Retrieved on October 31, 2024, from https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/map/?myaddress=Search California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2019. California State Scenic Highway System Map [map database]. Retrieved on October 31, 2024, from https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116 f1aacaa.

California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2024. State and Federally Listed Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Plants of California. Retrieved on October 31, 2024, from https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109390 California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2024. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants [database].

Mountain View 7.5-Minute USGS Topographic Quadrangle. Retrieved on October 31, 2024, from
https://rareplants.cnps.org/Search/result?frm=T&ccl=SCL&sl=1&quad=3712241:&elev=:m:o California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Guidance on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20190122- 743_Technical_Advisory.pdf. (accessed December 2024).

Clean Water Program. 2017. C.3 Stormwater Technical Guidance. https://www.cleanwaterprogram.org/images/uploads/C3_Technical_Guidance_v6_Oct_201 7_FINAL_Errata_updated_04.20.18.pdf. (accessed November 2024).

Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON)/Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 2020. 1050.1F Desk Reference – Noise and Noise-Compatible Land Use. February 2020.

Federal Transit Administration. 2018. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. FTA Report No. 0123. Retrieved on December 29, 2024, from
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research- innovation/118131/transit-noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no- 0123_0.pdf
Kenneth Rodrigues & Partners, Inc. 2024. Castro Commons Site 1. May 31, 2024.

Mountain View, City of. 2024. City of Mountain View Downtown Precise Plan. Adopted September 2024. Retrieved on October 30, 2024, from
https://developmentpermits.mountainview.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/1168/638 627874867430000
_____. N.D. Mountain View Development Projects [interactive map]. Retrieved on January 2, 2025, from https://econdev.mountainview.gov/business/development-projects References
Class 32 Categorical Exemption Report 29
Replica. 2023. Replica Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) Data. 2023. (Accessed November 2024) State Water Resources Control Board [SWRCB]. 2024. GeoTracker [map database]. Retrieved on October 31, 2024, from
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=Search+GeoTrac ker
United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2024. Urbanization and Stormwater Runoff.

Retrieved on December 3, 2024, from
https://www.epa.gov/sourcewaterprotection/urbanization-and-stormwater-runoff United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2024a. IPaC Information and Planning for Consultation. Retrieved on October 30, 2024 from
https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/location/SQJR5GZMABCKJJTSCJEX4YGL6Q/resources#endan gered-species
_____. 2022b. Wetlands Mapper. https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/wetlands/apps/wetlands- mapper/. (accessed November 2022).

City of Mountain View
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Project

30 This page intentionally left blank.

Appendix A
Multi-Modal Transportation Analysis

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use
Development
Multi-Modal Transportation Analysis
Prepared for:

Rincon Consultants, Inc.

May 2, 2025
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Hexagon Office: 100 Century Center Court, Suite 501
San Jose, CA 95112
Phone: 408.971.6100
Hexagon Job Number: 24KK17
Client Name: Rincon Consultants, Inc.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025

Table of Contents
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... i

1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1

2. Existing Transportation Conditions ................................................................................................. 9

3. Intersection Operational Analysis ................................................................................................. 19

4. Other Transportation Issues ......................................................................................................... 31 Appendices
Appendix A Traffic Counts
Appendix B Level of Service Calculations
Appendix C Volume Summary
Appendix D Gross Project Trip, Existing Trip Credit, and Retail Pass-By Trip Assignments Appendix E Signal Warrant Analyses
List of Tables
Table ES-1 Intersection Level of Service Summary .............................................................................. iv Table 1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Average Control Delay ...... 6 Table 2 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Average Delay ............... 6 Table 3 Existing Transit Services ................................................................................................... 12 Table 4 Existing Intersection Levels of Service .............................................................................. 18 Table 5 Project Trip Generation Estimates .................................................................................... 21 Table 6 Background Intersection Levels of Service ....................................................................... 28 Table 7 Intersection Queuing Analysis Summary .......................................................................... 30 List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location and Study Intersections ................................................................................. 2 Figure 2 Proposed Site Plan ............................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3 Existing Transit Services ................................................................................................... 11 Figure 4 Existing Bicycle Facilities .................................................................................................. 14 Figure 5 Existing Lane Configurations ............................................................................................ 16 Figure 6 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 17 Figure 7 Project Trip Distribution ..................................................................................................... 22 Figure 8 Net Project Trip and Pass-by Assignment ........................................................................ 23 Figure 9 Diverted Traffic From Fairmont Avenue ............................................................................ 25 Figure 10 Background Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................. 26 Figure 11 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes ......................................................................... 27 Figure 12 Parking Garage Plans ....................................................................................................... 35 Figure 13 Pedestrian Quality of Service (PQOS) Map ...................................................................... 38 Figure 14 Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS) Map ....................................................................... 41

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | i
Executive Summary
This report presents the results of the multi-modal transportation analysis (MTA) conducted for the proposed mixed-use development at 881 Castro Street in Mountain View, California (see Figure 1). The project site is located at the northeast corner of the Castro Street and El Camino Real intersection and within the Downtown Precise Plan (DPP) area. The project proposes to demolish the existing buildings on site and construct an 8-story mixed-use building with 140 condominium units and 9,776 square feet of ground-floor commercial space with two levels of below-grade parking. A multi-use paseo that is closed to motor vehicle traffic is proposed to replace the existing Fairmont Avenue between Castro Street and Hope Street. Existing buildings on site include three commercial properties and four residential units. Vehicle access to the parking garage would be provided via a new driveway on Hope Street.

The MTA evaluates potential transportation effects of the project in accordance with the standards and methodologies set forth by the City of Mountain View’s MTA Handbook. The MTA includes an analysis of the traffic operational effects of the project on the key intersections in the vicinity of the site, an evaluation of conformance with City plans, a review of site access and on-site circulation, an evaluation of potential adverse effects on transit services and pedestrian and bicycle facilities, an evaluation of traffic effects on neighborhood streets, and a parking evaluation.

VMT Analysis
Pursuant to Senate Bill 743, transportation impacts should be measured using vehicle miles travelled (VMT) instead of the previously used Level of Service (LOS) (California Office of Planning and Research [OPR] 2018). The City’s VMT policy establishes certain projects that are presumed to have a less than significant impact per the CEQA guidance and do not require a VMT analysis. Among the types of projects presumed to have a less than significant impact includes residential and employment projects located in areas of low VMT, defined as exhibiting VMT that is 15 percent or greater below the existing nine-county Bay Area regional reference average VMT. Reference average VMT per capita or per employee are obtained from the Santa Clara Countywide VMT Evaluation Tool. For residential developments, the VMT threshold is 11.86 miles per capita (15% below the Bay Area average of 13.95 miles per capita). The VMT Tool estimates that the existing VMT in the project area is 11.28 miles per capita and would be 11.04 miles per capita with the proposed development. Because VMT in the area, including with the proposed project, would be below the threshold of 11.86 miles per capita, impacts would be less than significant.

Project Trip Estimates
Trip generation estimates for the proposed project were based on trip rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. After applying the applicable 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | ii
reductions and existing trip credits, the net new project trips would be 631 new daily trips, including 50 new trips (9 inbound and 41 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 57 new trips (37 inbound and 20 outbound) during the PM peak hour.

Diverted Traffic from Fairmont Avenue Closure
The project would close Fairmont Avenue to motor vehicle traffic between Castro Street and Hope Street. The traffic on Fairmont that would be diverted to Yosemite Avenue and El Camino Real was estimated using the peak-hour intersection counts on Fairmont Avenue at Castro Street and Hope Street.

It is expected that the traffic traveling southbound and northbound on Castro Street and turning onto eastbound Fairmont Avenue would be relocated to Yosemite Avenue and El Camino Real, respectively.

There are surface parking spaces behind the existing commercial buildings on Castro Street between Yosemite Avenue and Fairmont Avenue. Traffic associated with these parking spaces currently enters Yosemite Avenue and exits through Fairmont Avenue. The project would demolish the southern part of the area (buildings and surface parking), so the traffic associated with the remaining parking spaces would need to exit through Yosemite Avenue with the project. The project should work with the adjacent property to reconfigure the remaining surface parking area, so that traffic can enter and exit the parking area via Yosemite Avenue.

Intersection Level of Service Analysis
The results of the intersection level of service analysis (see Table ES-1) show that all study intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service with and without the addition of project trips and the diverted traffic from the closure of Fairmont Avenue.

Intersection Queuing Analysis
The results of the intersection queuing analysis indicate that the westbound left turn from El Camino Real at Castro Street would have queuing deficiencies exacerbated by the project. Although this is a CMP intersection, as described below, the small increase in vehicle queueing would not cause an adverse effect on traffic operations of the intersection.

The existing storage capacity for the westbound left-turn lane on El Camino Real at Castro Street is approximately 350 feet (14 vehicles). Under existing and background conditions, the 95th percentile queue exceeds the storage lane by 25 feet, or one vehicle during the PM peak hour. The project would add one vehicle to the PM peak-hour queue compared to the background conditions, causing the queue to exceed the storage lane by two vehicles. The small increase is not expected to affect the westbound through traffic as there are three westbound through lanes.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Operations
The project would have an adverse effect on pedestrian operations because the project is expected to add vehicle trips to nearby street segments that have a pedestrian quality of service (PQOS) score of 3 or more, including El Camino Real and Castro Street. The project would provide wider sidewalks with landscaping along the project frontage to enhance the pedestrian environment. The project would also build new ADA curb ramps along the project frontage at the Hope Street/El Camino Real intersection.

Taking these factors into account, the project is expected to improve the PQOS along El Camino Real along the project frontage.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | iii
The project would create an adverse effect on bicycle operations, as the project is expected to add vehicle trips to El Camino Real and Shoreline Boulevard, which have a bicycle level of service (BLTS) of 3 or 4. In addition, the El Camino Real Streetscape Plan is currently being integrated and new buffered bike lanes would be installed. With the planned improvements identified in these documents, El Camino Real is expected to have a BLTS score of 2 and Shoreline Boulevard between El Camino Real and Wright Avenue is expected to have a BLTS score of 1.

Other Transportation Issues
The proposed site plan shows generally adequate site access and on-site circulation. As allowed per state legislation, the project should consider the following recommendation resulting from the site plan review.

Recommendations
• The proposed loading zone on Hope Street shall be designed for both freight and passenger loading. The project shall coordinate with any future curb cuts on adjacent projects (e.g., for trash pickup from the proposed development at 969 Hope Street) to better facilitate the proposed loading zone and provide more functional access on Hope Street. • Lighting on public rights of way must comply with the Downtown lighting standards. Given that the multi-use paseo will provide a public connection between Castro Street and Hope Street, it is recommended that the proposed lighting along the paseo also meet the downtown lighting design criteria for pedestrian pathways, if feasible.
• It is recommended the applicant coordinate with the adjacent property owner, north of the project site on Castro Street, 805 Castro, to update the surface parking area to the rear of the building, so traffic can better enter and exit the parking area via Yosemite Avenue. The existing configuration is designed for through access to Fairmont Avenue, which will no longer be available with the proposed project.
• Though the project meets long-term bicycle parking requirements, it is recommended the project provide long-term bicycle parking at grade for improved access and fewer conflicts with onsite vehicle movements, if feasible.
•
•
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA February 13, 2025 Page | iv
Table ES-1
Intersection Level of Service Summary

LOS Peak Count Avg. Av g. Avg. Incr. In Incr. In
ID Intersection Standard Hour Date Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS Crit. Del.4 Crit. V/C4 1 Castro St and El Camino Real* E AM 09/12/24 41. 9 D 42.7 D 43.1 D -0.6 -0.002 PM 09/12/24 39.6 D 40.7 D 40.2 D 0.6 0.016
2 Castro St and Fairmont Ave2 D AM 09/12/24 8.1 A 8.2 A -- -- -- -- (one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 7.9 A 8.0 A -- -- -- -- 3 Castro St and High School Way D AM 09/12/24 10.3 B 10.5 B 10.5 B -- -- (one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 11.5 B 12.0 B 12.0 B -- -- 4 Castro St and Yosemite Ave D AM 09/12/24 11.8 B 12.3 B 12.2 B -- -- (one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 12.2 B 12.8 B 12.8 B -- -- 5 Hope St and Yosemite Ave D AM 09/12/24 9.3 A 9.3 A 9.4 A -- -- (two-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 9.5 A 9.5 A 9.6 A -- -- 6 Hope St and Fairmont Ave3 D AM 09/12/24 9.1 A 9.1 A 8.9 A -- -- (two-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 9.2 A 9.2 A 8.7 A -- -- 7 Hope St and El Camino Real D AM 09/12/24 12.3 B 12.4 B 12.9 B -- -- (one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 13.0 B 13.0 B 13.5 B -- -- 8 E AM 09/12/24 15.8 B 16.3 B 16.4 B 0.1 0.003
PM 09/12/24 18.6 B 19.2 B 19.3 B 0.1 0.009
9 Shoreline Blvd and Church St D AM 09/12/24 18.1 B 19.4 B 19.5 B 0.2 0.002 PM 09/12/24 23.6 C 24.1 C 24.2 C 0.3 0.004
10 E AM 09/12/24 50.4 D 50.4 D 50.1 D -0.4 -0.002
PM 09/12/24 46.0 D 46.1 D 46.0 D 0.0 0.001
11 Hope St and Project Dwy (Future) D AM -- -- -- -- -- 8.6 A -- -- (one-way stop control) PM -- -- -- -- -- 8.7 A -- --
Notes:
* Denotes VTA CMP intersection

2. With the project, Fairmont Avenue would be closed to vehicle traffic. There would be no opposing traffic for Castro Street.

3. With the project, the west leg of Fairmont Avenue would be closed to vehicle traffic.

4. The critical delay and v/c increase for unsignalized intersections are not calculated, as these values only determine the adverse effect at signalized intersections.

1. Weighted average control delay measured in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections. Worst approach delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS are reported for side-street stop-controlled intersections.

Existing Background Background+Project
Castro St and Church St
Shoreline Blvd/Miramonte Ave and El
Camino Real*
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 1

1. Introduction
This report presents the results of the multi-modal transportation analysis (MTA) conducted for the proposed mixed-use development at 881 Castro Street in Mountain View, California (see Figure 1). The project site is located within the Downtown Precise Plan (DPP) area. The project proposes to demolish the existing buildings on site and construct an 8-story mixed-use building with 140 condominium units and 9,776 square feet of ground-floor commercial space with two levels of below-grade parking. A multi-use paseo that is closed to motor vehicle traffic is proposed to replace the existing Fairmont Avenue between Castro Street and Hope Street. Existing buildings on site to be demolished include three commercial properties and four residential units. Vehicle access to the parking garage would be provided via a new driveway on Hope Street.

Scope of Study
The purpose of the study is to evaluate potential transportation effects of the project in accordance with the standards and methodologies set forth by the City of Mountain View and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The VTA administers the Congestion Management Program (CMP).

The MTA was prepared based on the City’s MTA Handbook (February 2021). The MTA includes an analysis of the traffic operational effects of the project on the key intersections, evaluations of City policies conformances, a review of site access and on-site circulation, an evaluation of potential adverse effects on transit services and pedestrian and bicycle facilities, an evaluation of traffic effects on neighborhood streets, and a parking evaluation.

Study Intersections
The study intersections were selected in accordance with the City’s MTA Handbook, VTA’s Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines (October 2014), and in consultation with Mountain View staff. The study includes those intersections that would experience a traffic increase of 10 or more peak-hour trips per lane. The study intersections are listed below and shown on Figure 1. Two study intersections are designated as CMP intersections.

Mountain View
1 2
3 5
4 6
11 7
8 9
10 Church St
Castro St
W El Camino Real Calderon Ave
Yosemite Ave
W Dana StSnow St
Fairmont Ave
S Shoreline Blvd
High School Way
Miramonte A
ve
Miramonte Ave Hope StHope StMiramonte A
ve
Hope St
X = Study Intersection
= Site Location
LEGEND
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 1
Site Location and Study Intersections
Figure 2
Proposed Site Plan
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 4

1. Castro Street and El Camino Real (CMP intersection)

2. Castro Street and Fairmont Avenue (unsignalized)

3. Castro Street and High School Way (unsignalized)

4. Castro Street and Yosemite Avenue (unsignalized)

5. Hope Street and Yosemite Avenue (unsignalized)

6. Hope Street and Fairmont Avenue (unsignalized)

7. Hope Street and El Camino Real (unsignalized)

8. Castro Street and Church Street

9. Shoreline Boulevard and Church Street

10. Shoreline Boulevard-Miramonte Avenue and El Camino Real (CMP intersection)

11. Hope Street and Project Driveway (unsignalized) – future project access Traffic conditions at the study intersections were analyzed for the weekday AM and PM peak hours of traffic. Locally, the AM peak hour of traffic is usually between 7:00 and 10:00 AM, and the PM peak hour is typically between 4:00 and 7:00 PM. It is during these periods that the most congested traffic conditions occur on an average weekday.

Intersection traffic conditions were evaluated for the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions. Existing AM and PM peak-hour traffic volumes were obtained from new turning-movement counts conducted in September 2024.
• Background Conditions. Background traffic volumes were estimated by adding to existing traffic volumes the projected volumes from approved but not yet constructed developments in the vicinity of the project. The added traffic from approved but not yet constructed developments was based on the list of approved projects provided by the Cities of Mountain View and Los Altos.
• Background Plus Project Conditions. Background plus project traffic volumes were estimated by adding the additional traffic generated by the project and the diverted traffic from the closure of Fairmont Avenue. Background plus project conditions were evaluated relative to background conditions in order to determine potential project adverse effects.

Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology
This section presents the methods used to determine traffic conditions at the study intersections. It includes descriptions of the data requirements, the analysis methodologies, and the applicable level of service standards.

Data Requirements
The data required for the analysis were obtained from new traffic counts, the Cities of Mountain View and Los Altos, Google Earth, and field observations. The following data were collected from these sources:
• Intersection traffic volumes,
• Lane geometries,
• Signal timing and phasing, and
• A list of approved but not yet constructed developments. 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 5
Intersection Level of Service Analysis Methodologies and Standards Traffic conditions at the study intersections were evaluated using level of service (LOS). Level of service is a qualitative description of operating conditions ranging from LOS A, or free-flow conditions with little or no delay, to LOS F, or jammed conditions with excessive delays.

Signalized Intersections
For signalized intersections, the level of service method evaluates intersection operations on the basis of average control delay time for all vehicles at the intersection based on the methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Table 1 presents the level of service definitions for signalized intersections.

This study utilizes the TRAFFIX software to determine intersection levels of service based on the 2000 HCM methodology. Since TRAFFIX is approved by VTA as the level of service analysis software for CMP signalized intersections, the City of Mountain View employs the CMP default values for the analysis parameters. TRAFFIX software was used to analyze intersection operations and intersection adverse effects based on the increases in critical-movement delay and the volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c) between no-project and project scenarios.

According to the City’s MTA Handbook, the standard for signalized intersections is LOS D, except for CMP intersections and facilities, County Expressway intersections, and intersections in the Downtown and San Antonio Center planning areas, where the standard is LOS E.

Unsignalized Intersections
Level of service analysis at unsignalized intersections is generally used to determine the need for modifications in the type of intersection control (i.e., all-way stop or signalization). As part of the evaluation, traffic volumes, delays and traffic signal warrants are evaluated to determine if the existing intersection control is appropriate.

For unsignalized intersections, level of service depends on the average delay experienced by vehicles on the stop-controlled approaches. For side street stop-controlled intersections (two-way or T- intersections), operations are defined by the average control delay experienced by vehicles entering the intersection from the stop-controlled approaches on minor streets or from left-turn approaches on major streets. The level of service is reported based on the average delay for the worst approach. The level of service definitions for unsignalized intersections is shown in Table 2. This study utilizes the TRAFFIX software to determine intersection levels of service based on the 2000 HCM methodology for unsignalized intersections.

The City of Mountain View does not have an adopted level of service standard for unsignalized intersections. However, the City strives to maintain LOS D for unsignalized intersections. 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 6
Table 1
Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Average Control Delay

Table 2
Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Average Delay

Source: Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Washington, D.C., 2000), p.10-16.

Level of
Service Description Average Control Delay
(seconds/vehicle)
A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths. 10.0 or less
B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. 10.1 to 20.0
C
Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear.

20.1 to 35.0
F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over-saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. greater than 80.0 D
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.

35.1 to 55.0
E
Operations with high delays indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences.

55.1 to 80.0
A Little or no traffic delay 10.0 or less
B Short traffic delays 10.1 to 15.0
C Average traffic delays 15.1 to 25.0
D Long traffic delays 25.1 to 35.0
E Very long traffic delays 35.1 to 50.0
F Extreme traffic delays greater than 50.0
Source: Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Washington, D.C., 2000) p17-2.

Level of Service Description Average Delay Per Vehicle (Sec.) 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 7
Intersection Vehicle Queuing Analysis
The analysis of intersection operations was supplemented with a vehicle queuing analysis at intersections where the project would add a substantial number of trips to the left-turn movements or stop-controlled approaches. The vehicle queuing analysis is used to determine the appropriate storage lengths for the high demand turn lanes where the project would add a substantial number of trips.

Vehicle queues were estimated using a Poisson probability distribution, which estimates the probability of “n” vehicles for a vehicle movement using the following formula:

P (x=n) = λ
n e – (λ)
n!
Where:

P (x=n) = probability of “n” vehicles in queue per lane n = number of vehicles in the queue per lane
λ = average # of vehicles in the queue per lane (vehicles per hr per lane/signal cycles per hr) The basis of the analysis is as follows: (1) the Poisson probability distribution is used to estimate the 95th percentile maximum number of queued vehicles for a particular left-turn movement; (2) the estimated maximum number of vehicles in the queue is translated into a queue length, assuming 25 feet per vehicle; and (3) the estimated maximum queue length is compared to the existing or planned available storage capacity for the left-turn movement. This analysis thus provides a basis for estimating future turn pocket storage requirements at intersections.

For signalized intersections, the 95th percentile queue length value indicates that during the peak hour, a queue of this length or less would occur on 95 percent of the signal cycles, or a queue length larger than the 95th percentile queue would only occur on 5 percent of the signal cycles (about 3 cycles during the peak hour for a signal with a 60-second cycle length). Thus, turn pocket storage designs based on the 95th percentile queue length would ensure that storage space would be exceeded only 5 percent of the time for a signalized movement.

Definition of Adverse Intersection Operational Effects
Adverse operational effects at signalized intersections are based on the City of Mountain View and CMP level of service standards. For the unsignalized intersections, the City of Mountain View has applied adverse effect criteria in other traffic studies even though there is no formally adopted level of service policy for unsignalized intersections.

Signalized Intersections
According to the City of Mountain View and CMP level of service standards, a development is said to create an adverse operational effect on traffic conditions at a signalized intersection if for either peak hour, either of the following conditions occurs:

1. The level of service at the intersection drops below its respective level of service standard (LOS D or better for all local intersections in Mountain View and LOS E or better for CMP and expressway intersections) when project traffic is added, or

2. An intersection that operates below its level of service standard under no-project conditions experiences an increase in critical-movement delay of four (4) or more seconds, and an increase in critical volume-to-capacity ratio (v/c) of one percent (0.01) or more when project traffic is added.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 8
The exception to this threshold is when the addition of project traffic reduces the amount of average control delay for critical movements, i.e., the change in average control delay for critical movements is negative. In this case, the threshold is when the project increases the critical v/c value by 0.01 or more.

Unsignalized Intersections
The project is said to create an adverse operational effect on traffic conditions at an unsignalized intersection in the City of Mountain View if for either peak hour:

1. The addition of project traffic causes the average intersection delay for all-way stop-controlled or the worst movement/approach for side-street stop-controlled intersections to degrade to LOS F, and

2. The intersection satisfies the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) peak-hour volume signal warrant.

Report Organization
This report has a total of four chapters. Chapter 2 describes existing conditions including the existing roadway network, transit service, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Chapter 3 presents the intersection operational analysis including the method by which project traffic is estimated, the project’s traffic effects on the intersection operations and a vehicle queuing analysis. Chapter 4 presents the analyses of other transportation-related issues, including conformance with the General Plan, Downtown Precise Plan, and the Downtown Lighting Study, site access and on-site circulation, potential effects on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities, effects on surrounding neighborhood streets, and parking.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 9

2. Existing Transportation Conditions
This chapter describes existing conditions for transportation facilities in the vicinity of the site, including the roadway network, transit services, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and traffic operations at the study intersections.

Existing Roadway Network
Regional access to the project site is provided by SR 85 and SR 237. Local access to the project site is provided via El Camino Real (SR 82), Shoreline Boulevard, Castro Street, Calderon Avenue, Church Street, Fairmont Avenue, and Hope Street.

SR 85 is a north-south freeway that begins at US 101, east of N. Shoreline Boulevard, extends south towards San Jose, and terminates at US 101 east of the Silicon Valley Boulevard/Bernal Road interchange. SR 85 is six lanes wide (two mixed-flow lanes and one HOV lane in each direction) in the vicinity of the project site. SR 85 provides access to the project site via interchanges at SR 237 and El Camino Real.

SR 237 is a four-lane to six-lane freeway within the project vicinity that extends west to El Camino Real in Mountain View and east to I-880 in Milpitas. East of Mathilda Avenue, SR 237 has two mixed-flow lanes and one HOV lane in each direction. West of Mathilda Avenue, SR 237 has two mixed-flow lanes in each direction. SR 237 provides access to the project site via a full interchange at El Camino Real.

El Camino Real (SR 82) is a six-lane arterial that extends from Santa Clara County northerly to San Mateo County. El Camino Real is oriented in an approximately east-west direction in the project vicinity with a raised, landscaped median and left-turn pockets provided at some intersections. Sidewalks exist on both sides of the street. In the project vicinity, Caltrans is currently in the process of installing protected bike lanes and removing on-street parking. The speed limit is 35 miles per hour (mph). El Camino Real provides access to the site via its intersections with Castro Street and Hope Street.

Shoreline Boulevard is a north-south arterial that transitions from Miramonte Avenue in the south at El Camino Real (SR 82) and extends across US 101 to Shoreline Park on the Bay side. Shoreline Boulevard is a four to six-lane roadway with a landscaped median and left-turn pockets at some intersections between El Camino Real and Stierlin Road. North of Stierlin Road, Shoreline Boulevard is a four-lane undivided roadway. Shoreline Boulevard has bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the street except between Villa Street and Wright Avenue. On-street parking is permitted on Shoreline Boulevard in the project vicinity between High School Way and Villa Street. The speed limit is 35 mph.

Castro Street is a two-lane north-south collector street starting from Miramonte Avenue in the south and transitioning into Moffett Boulevard at Central Expressway in the north. Castro Street has a 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 10
landscaped median with left-turn pockets at intersections south of El Camino Real and north of Church Street. Bike lanes are provided south of El Camino Real. There are sidewalks along both sides of the entire street in the project vicinity. On-street parking is permitted on both sides of the street between El Camino Real and California Street, except between Mercy Street and north of Church Street. South of El Camino Real, parking is permitted on the east side of the street between Victor Way and the VTA Route 51 bus stop. Parking is permitted on the west side between Sonia Way and the southern Miramonte Gardens Apartments driveway. The speed limit is 25 mph. Castro Street is closed to vehicular traffic from California Street to Evelyn Avenue (east of Castro Street) in the northbound direction and from Central Expressway to California Street in the southbound direction.

Calderon Avenue is a north-south two-lane collector between El Camino Real and Evelyn Avenue.

South of El Camino Real, it becomes Phyllis Avenue. Bike lanes exist along both sides of the street for the entire length. Sidewalks exist along both sides of the street. On-street parking is permitted on both sides of the street between Evelyn Avenue and Dana Street, and on some segments of the street between Velarde Street and Centre Street. The posted speed limit is 25 mph.

Church Street is a two-lane east-west local street between Yuba Drive in the east and Shoreline Boulevard in the west, where it transitions into Latham Street. Sidewalks exist along both sides of the street. On-street parking is permitted along both sides of the street, except between Franklin Street and Castro Street from 8 AM to 4 PM and between Castro Street and Hope Street at all times. There is one sign in each direction that indicates Church Street is a bike route just east of Shoreline Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Access to the project site would be provided via its intersection with Hope Street.

Fairmont Avenue is a two-lane east-west local street between Castro Street and Shary Avenue.

Sidewalks exist along both sides of the street. At Castro Street, only eastbound traffic is permitted along Fairmont Avenue. On-street parking is permitted along both sides of the street. Fairmont Avenue would be closed to vehicular traffic between Castro Street and Hope Street with the project and replaced with a multi-use paseo.

Hope Street is a two-lane north-south local street between El Camino Real and Evelyn Avenue.

Sidewalks exist along both sides of the street. On-street parking is permitted along both sides of the street, with a two-hour time limit between Mercy Street and Evelyn Avenue from 9 AM to 6 PM. Hope Street provides direct access to the proposed project.

Existing Transit Services
Existing public transit services in the study area are provided by the VTA and the City of Mountain View. VTA operates bus and light rail transit (LRT) services in Santa Clara County and Google, partnering with the City of Mountain View, provides shuttle services between residential areas and points of interest within the City (see Figure 3 and Table 3).

VTA Bus Service
VTA Local Routes 51 and 52 and Frequent Routes 22 and 522 serve the project area with bus stops in each direction along El Camino Real and Castro Street. The bus stops closest to the project site are along Castro Street for routes 51 and 52, approximately 155 feet north of the project site, and along El Camino Real for routes 22 and 522, approximately 355 feet to the project sire. Routes 51 and 52 also stop at the Mountain View Transit Center, which is served by an additional two VTA local bus routes, 21 and 40.

MVgo C, D
MVgo D
MVgo C
MVgo C
MVgo B, D
MVgo A
MVgo C
522
22 522
22 51
21 51
51 52
52 52
51 21 51
21 52
40 21 Mountain View
Transit Center
MVgo A, MVgo B,
MVgo C, MVgo D
MVCS
21 51 5240
85 237
Castro St
Church St
Villa St
W El Camino Real
Mercy St
View St
Calderon Ave
California St
Central Expy
Pettis Ave
W Evelyn Ave
W Dana St
S Shoreline Blvd
N El Monte Ave
Easy St
Mariposa Ave
Yose
mite Ave
Snow St
Fairmont Ave
Mountain View
Ave
High School
Way
Escuela Ave
Phyllis Ave
Hope StHope StHope St
= VTA Local Bus Route
= VTA Rapid Bus Route
= Site Location
LEGEND
XX
= VTA Light Rail: Mountain View - Alum Rock
= Nearby Bus Stop
51,52,
MVCS
MVCS
51,52
22,52,522
22,522
= MVgo Route
= Mountain View Community Shuttle (MVCS)
= VTA Frequent Bus RouteXX
Moun
tain
Mountain
ViewViewCaltrainCaltrain
StationStation
Mountain
ViewCaltrain
Station
= Caltrain Tracks
XXX
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 3
Existing Transit Services
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 12
Table 3
Existing Transit Services

Mountain View Community Shuttle
Operated by the City of Mountain View and Google, the Mountain View Community Shuttle (MVCS) provides free service to many residential neighborhoods, senior residences and services, city offices, library, recreational facilities, medical offices, shopping centers, and entertainment venues in the City.

The shuttle stops closest to the project site are on Castro Street along the project frontage. The MVCS also stops at the Mountain View Transit Center.

Mountain View Transit Center
The Mountain View Transit Center is on Evelyn Avenue at Hope Street, about 0.6 mile from the project site. Although the Transit Center is just outside of walking distance to the project site, it is accessible via VTA routes 51 and 52. The Transit Center is served by Caltrain, VTA LRT, several VTA bus routes, four MVgo shuttle routes, and the MVCS.

Caltrain Commuter Train Service
Caltrain provides frequent commuter train service between San Jose and San Francisco seven days a week, with stops at most cities in between. During the AM peak period between 7:00 and 10:00, there are 3 limited northbound and southbound trains, 2 express northbound and 3 express southbound trains, and 6 local northbound and southbound trains serving the Mountain View station. During the PM peak period between 4:00 and 7:00, there are 3 limited northbound and southbound trains, 3 express northbound and southbound trains, and 6 local northbound and southbound trains serving the Mountain View station. Bicycles are permitted on Caltrain, and there are bicycle racks and bicycle lockers available at the Mountain View Transit Center.

Headways1
Route Route Description (minutes)
VTA Bus Routes
Frequent Route 22 Palo Alto Transit
Center - Eastridge
4:15 AM - 3:00 AM
(next day) 15 El Camino Real and Castro Street 355
Local Route 51 Moffet Field - West
Valley College 5:50 AM - 7:55 PM 30 Castro Street and Yosemite Avenue 155
Local Route 52
Foothill College -
Mountain View Transit
Center via El Monte
7:10 AM - 7:30 PM 23-38 Castro Street and Yosemite
Avenue 155
Frequent Route 522 Palo Alto Transit
Center - Eastridge
4:40 AM - 11:35
PM 15 El Camino Real and Castro Street 355
Mountain View Community Shuttle2
MVCS Throughout Mountain
View 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM 30 Castro Street and Yosemite
Avenue 155
Notes:

2. Operated by Mountain View and Google. It provides free transportation connections between many residential neighborhoods, senior residences and services, city offices, library, park and recreational facilities, medical offices, shopping centers, and entertainment venues throughout Mountain View.

Weekday Hours
of Operation Nearby Bus Stops
Walking Distance from
Nearest Stop to Project
Site (feet)

1. Headways during weekday peak periods as of October 2024. 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 13
VTA Light-Rail Transit Service
The VTA operates the 42.2-mile LRT system extending from south San Jose through downtown to the northern areas of San Jose, Santa Clara, Milpitas, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale. The service operates nearly 24 hours a day with 15-minute headways during much of the day. The Mountain View- Alum Rock LRT line (Orange Line) operates along Central Expressway within the project vicinity and a stop at the Mountain View Transit Center.

Mountain View Transportation Management Association (TMA) Shuttles The TMA operates the MVgo shuttle system. This shuttle system is provided through the collection of TMA member dues. MVgo operates four shuttle routes that provide service to employment areas from the Mountain View Transit Center. Three routes serve the North Bayshore area, and one route serves the N. Whisman area. The shuttles are timed to meet Caltrain arrivals during the AM and departures during PM commute periods. All MVgo shuttle Routes A, B, C, and D stop at the Mountain View Transit Center.

Existing Pedestrian Facilities
Pedestrian facilities consist of sidewalks and crosswalks, which are present along most roadways in the project vicinity, and at signalized and some unsignalized intersections. Pedestrian signal heads and push buttons are present at the signalized study intersections where crosswalks are available.

Sidewalks are present along El Camino Real, Castro Street, Hope Street, and Yosemite Avenue.

Sidewalks are also present on virtually all other streets in the area. Crosswalks exist across virtually all intersections across Castro Street. The crosswalks across Castro Street at Yosemite Avenue are high- visibility crosswalks. A midblock crossing exists along Castro Street between Church Street and Yosemite Avenue.

Castro Street between California Avenue and Evelyn Avenue is a pedestrian mall and is closed to vehicular and bicycle traffic. The City is currently working on further improvements along the pedestrian mall, including decorating the street, improving wayfinding signage, and intersection improvements.

The intersection improvements would include a single centralized crossing with new pedestrian signals at the Castro Street/Villa Street and Castro Street/Dana Street intersections.

Within a typical walking distance (a half mile or 10 minutes), continuous pedestrian facilities are present between the project and the surrounding land uses, including Downtown Mountain View, restaurants, retail shops, bus stops, and offices in the area.

Existing Bicycle Facilities
The bicycle facilities that exist within one mile of the project site (see Figure 4) include a multi-use trail (Class I bikeway), striped bike lanes (Class II bikeway), shared bike routes (Class III bikeway), and protected bike lanes (Class IV bikeway). Bike paths or multi-use trails are shared between pedestrians and bicyclists and separated from motor vehicle traffic. Bike lanes are lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycles with special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bike routes are streets with signage and pavement markings where bicyclists share a travel lane with motorists. Protected bike lanes are lanes on roadways that provide separation between bicyclists and vehicles through posts, parked cars, planters, etc.

Stevens Creek Trail
85 237
Castro St
Church St
Villa St
W El Camino Real
Mercy St
View St
Calderon Ave
California St
Central Expy
Pettis Ave
W Evelyn Ave
W Dana St
S Shoreline Blvd
N El Monte Ave
Easy St
Mariposa Ave
Yose
mite Ave
Snow St
Fairmont Ave
Mountain View Ave
High School
Way
Escuela Ave
Phyllis Ave
Miramonte AveMiramonte AveMiramonte Ave
= Site Location
LEGEND
= Class II Bike Lanes
= Class III Bike Routes
= Class I Multi-use Trail
= Class IV Protected Bikeway
= In Progress Class IV Bike Lane
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 4
Existing Bicycle Facilities
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 15
The Stevens Creek Trail extends from the Bay Trail in Shoreline Park, under US 101 and Middlefield Road, and ends at Dale Avenue/Heatherstone Avenue. The trail is shared between pedestrians and bicyclists and separated from motor vehicle traffic. The trail includes an overcrossing at SR 237 and an underpass at El Camino Real in the project area. Access to the trail is available from El Camino Real, just west of SR 85.

Striped bike lanes are present along the following street segments:
• Shoreline Boulevard, for the entire street
• Miramonte Avenue, south of Harpster Drive
• Calderon Avenue, for the entire street
• Phyllis Avenue, for the entire street
• California Street, west of Castro Street
• Castro Street, south of El Camino Real
Castro Street provides protected bike lanes along both sides of the street, south of El Camino Real.

Caltrans is currently in the process of installing protected bike lanes along El Camino Real in the project vicinity. The completion is estimated for late 2025.

Bike routes are typically designated with sharrows (shared-lane pavement markings), and bikes may take the travel lane. Bike routes are appropriate for low-volume streets with slow travel speeds, especially those on which motorist volumes are low enough that passing maneuvers can use the full street width; on roadways with bicycle demand but without adequate space for bike lanes; and as “gap fillers” where there are short breaks in bike lanes due to right-of-way constraints. Bike routes are indicated with signs along the following streets:
• California Street, east of Castro Street,
• Church Street, for the entire street
Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Volumes
The existing lane configurations at the study intersections were obtained from field observations (see Figure 5).

Existing traffic volumes were obtained from turning movement counts collected on a typical weekday, Thursday, September 12, 2024, between 7:00 and 10:00 AM and between 4:00 and 7:00 PM (see Figure 6). The intersection turning-movement counts conducted for this analysis are presented in Appendix A.

NORTH
Not to Scale
9 5
1 6 7
2 3
8 4
10 St
Casto
Real
Camino
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
St
Hope
Figure 5
Existing Lane Configurations
St
Church
Way
School
High
Ave
Fairmont
Ave
Yosemite
El
Ave
Miramonte
11 Dwy
Project
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Hope
St
Hope
St
Casto
St
Hope
Blvd
Shoreline
Blvd
Shoreline
St
Church
Real
Camino
El
Ave
Yosemite
Ave
Fairmont
Real
Camino
El
STOP
STOP
LEGEND
= Signalized Intersection
= Stop Controlled ApproachSTOP
STOP
STOP
= Existing Condition
= Proposed Project Modifications
STOP
STOP
STOP
STOP
NORTH
Not to Scale
9 5
1 6 7
2 3
8 4
10 St
Casto
Real
Camino
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
St
Hope
Figure 6
Existing Traffic Volumes
St
Church
Way
School
High
Ave
Fairmont
Ave
Yosemite
El
Ave
Miramonte
11 Dwy
Project
LEGEND
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Hope
St
Hope
St
Casto
St
Hope
Blvd
Shoreline
Blvd
Shoreline
St
Church
Real
Camino
El
Ave
Yosemite
Ave
Fairmont
Real
Camino
El
= AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes XX(XX)
95(49)
113(109)
177(115)
105(189)
67(99)
39(55)
143(204)
1046(1307)
207(137)
112(101)
1001(1158)
44(42)
400(313)
5(25)
2(2)
199(351)
77(65)
323(255)
147(263)
38(26)
11(20)
57(94)
311(257)
24(20)
14(8)
159(254)
25(38)
9(11)
9(14)
28(33)
0(1)
0(1)
10(11)
5(12)
0(2)
13(20)
1(1)
8(8)
14(20)
3(0)
0(4)
35(39)
3(4)
1(3)
9(7)
2(1)
2(2)
0(4)
0(10)
4(20)
1(8)
4(19)
3(17) 1541(1661)
36(36)
1255(1496)
20(10)
45(48)
226(170)
49(48)
4(6)
92(161)
8(21)
32(45)
78(77)
21(18)
21(17)
78(89)
48(51)
23(16)
680(555)
28(48)
81(126)
628(729)
12(15)
29(57)
25(34)
78(67)
26(23)
36(56)
81(29)
145(132)
297(188)
50(24)
172(173)
331(351)
218(302)
114(114)
1110(1175)
116(112)
292(294)
779(1088)
127(147)
36(36)
3(17)
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 18
Existing Intersection Levels of Service
The results of the intersection level of service analysis show that all the study intersections currently operate at acceptable levels of service (see Table 4). The intersection level of service calculation sheets for the project are included in Appendix B.

Table 4
Existing Intersection Levels of Service

Observed Existing Traffic Conditions
Traffic conditions were observed in the field in November 2024 to identify any existing operational deficiencies and to confirm the accuracy of calculated levels of service. The purpose of this effort was (1) to identify any existing traffic problems that may not be directly related to intersection level of service, and (2) to identify any locations where the level of service analysis does not accurately reflect existing traffic conditions.

Overall, all study intersections operated adequately during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic, and the level of service analysis appears to accurately reflect existing traffic conditions.

LOS Peak Count Avg.

ID Intersection Standard Hour Date Delay1 LOS
1 Castro St and El Camino Real* E AM 09/12/24 41.9 D
PM 09/12/24 39.6 D
2 Castro St and Fairmont Ave D AM 09/12/24 8.1 A
(one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 7.9 A
3 Castro St and High School Way D AM 09/12/24 10.3 B
(one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 11.5 B
4 Castro St and Yosemite Ave D AM 09/12/24 11.8 B
(one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 12.2 B
5 Hope St and Yosemite Ave D AM 09/12/24 9.3 A
(two-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 9.5 A
6 Hope St and Fairmont Ave D AM 09/12/24 9.1 A
(two-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 9.2 A
7 Hope St and El Camino Real D AM 09/12/24 12.3 B
(one-way stop control) PM 09/12/24 13.0 B
8 E AM 09/12/24 15.8 B
PM 09/12/24 18.6 B
9 Shoreline Blvd and Church St D AM 09/12/24 18.1 B
PM 09/12/24 23.6 C
10 E AM 09/12/24 50.4 D
PM 09/12/24 46.0 D
Notes:
* Denotes VTA CMP intersection
Existing

Castro St and Church St
Shoreline Blvd/Miramonte Ave and
El Camino Real*
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 19

3. Intersection Operational Analysis
This chapter presents the vehicle traffic operational analysis including the method by which project traffic is estimated, the results of intersection level of service analysis, any adverse effects to intersection level of service caused by the project, and an intersection vehicle queuing analysis. A potential adverse operational effect on a study intersection is not considered a CEQA impact.

Project Trip Estimates
The magnitude of traffic produced by a new development and the locations where that traffic would appear were estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. In determining project trip generation, the magnitude of traffic traveling to and from the proposed project was estimated for the AM and PM peak hours. As part of the project trip distribution, the directions to and from which the project trips would travel were estimated. In the project trip assignment, the project trips were assigned to specific streets and intersections. These procedures are described below.

Trip Generation
Through empirical research, data have been collected that show trip generation rates for many types of land uses. The data are published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) manual entitled Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The magnitude of traffic added to the roadway system by a particular development is estimated by multiplying the applicable trip generation rates by the size of the development. Trip generation estimates (see Table 5) for the project are based on standard trip generation rates published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual for “Mid-Rise Multifamily Housing” (Land use 221) and “Strip Retail Plaza” (Land use 822).

The “Mid-Rise Multifamily Housing” category refers to apartments and condominiums located within the same building that have between 4 and 10 levels. The “Strip Retail Plaza” category refers to an integrated group of commercial establishments. This category includes trip data for retail/commercial uses less than 40,000 s.f.

Trip Adjustments and Reductions
Because the project would provide residential and retail mixed-use on site, some residents would patronize the retail business, which would result in the internalization of some project trips. Per the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)’s Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, an internal trip reduction of 15% between retail and residential uses was applied to the project. The trip reduction factor was first applied to the smaller trip generator; then the same trips were subtracted from the larger trip generator to account for both trip ends. 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 20
The project is located within 2,000 feet of a major bus stop1 for VTA Routes 22 and 522. Therefore, per the VTA TIA Guidelines, a 2% transit reduction was applied to the residential uses. This reduction is supported by the project’s access to public transit.

In addition, trip generation for retail uses is typically adjusted to account for pass-by trips. Pass-by trips are trips that would already be on the adjacent roadways (and are therefore already counted in the existing traffic) but would turn into the site while passing by. Pass-by trips are therefore excluded from the traffic projections (although pass-by traffic is accounted for at the site entrances). An average pass- by trip reduction of 30% was applied to the daily trips and the PM peak-hour trips of the retail component of the project based on the maximum allowable pass-by reduction per the VTA TIA Guidelines although the ITE Trip Generation Manual shows a higher pass-by rate (40%) for shopping plaza.

Existing Trip Credits
The project would demolish the existing uses on the site, including three commercial properties and four residential units. Trips associated with the existing uses on the project site can be subtracted from the project trip estimates. The trips generated by the existing uses were counted in September 2024.

Based on the driveway counts, the existing uses generated 230 daily trips, including 18 trips during the AM peak hour and 28 trips during PM peak hour.

Project Trips
After applying the trip reductions and existing trip credits, it is estimated that the proposed project would generate 631 new daily trips, including 50 new trips (9 inbound and 41 outbound) during the AM peak hour and 57 new trips (37 inbound and 20 outbound) during the PM peak hour (see Table 5).

Trip Distribution and Assignment
The trip distribution for the project was estimated based on existing travel patterns on the surrounding roadway network and the locations of complementary land uses (see Figure 7). Although Castro Street is closed to vehicular traffic north of California Street, motor vehicle trips to/from the Downtown area are expected to use Castro Street as the connecting road between the project site and the Downtown, and the trip distribution is taking into account overall Downtown access.

The net peak-hour trips generated by the proposed project were assigned to the roadway system based on the directions of approach and departure, the roadway network connections, and the location of project driveway (see Figure 8). Figure 8 also includes the pass-by trips at and near the driveway.

The assignments of the gross project trips, pass-by trips, and exiting trip credits are provided in Appendix D.

1 A major bus stop is defined as a stop where six or more buses per hour from the same or different routes stop during the peak period.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 21
Table 5
Project Trip Generation Estimates

El Camino Real has a raised median, so only right turns in and out of Hope Street are possible.

Inbound project traffic traveling eastbound on El Camino Real are expected to use Castro Street and Yosemite Avenue to access the driveway on Hope Street. Outbound project traffic from southbound Hope Street destined to eastbound El Camino Real would need to make a U-turn at Castro Street. Field observations showed that the traffic on the westbound approach on El Camino Real at Castro Street extended past Hope Street. However, the traffic along the westbound approach was not constant, leaving gaps for southbound vehicles from Hope Street to turn right and to enter the westbound left turn lane on El Camino Real at Castro Street. Thus, southbound right turn traffic from Hope Street to El Camino Real are not expected to experience long delays.

There are some movements with negative trips due to existing credits. Some movements, such as inbound and outbound movements to/from Fairmont Avenue, would not exist anymore. In addition, due to the different access points between the existing developments and the proposed development, some movements would not be replaced with project traffic.

Land Use Trips In Out Total In Out Total
Proposed Use
Mid-Rise Multifamily Residential1 140 units 4.54 636 0.37 12 40 52 0.39 33 22 55 - Residential/Retail Internal Capture (15%)3 -80 -1 -2 -3 -4 -4 -8 - Transit Reduction (2%)4 -11 0 -1 -1 -1 0 -1
545 11 37 48 28 18 46
Retail2 9.776 ksf 54.45 532 2.36 14 9 23 6.59 32 32 64
- Residential/Retail Internal Capture (15%)3 -80 -2 -1 -3 -4 -4 -8 - Pass-By Reduction (30%)5 -136 0 0 0 -8 -9 -17
316 12 8 20 20 19 39
Gross Proposed Trips 861 23 45 68 48 37 85
Existing Uses
Existing Uses6 230 14 4 18 11 17 28
Net Project Trips 631 9 41 50 37 20 57
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021.

2. Strip Retail Plaza (<40k) (Land Use 822): average rates in trips per 1,000 s.f. are used.

3. Residential/retail internal trip reductions were applied to the project per the 2014 Santa Clara VTA TIA Guidelines.

4. Per VTA TIA Guidelines, a transit trip reduction is applied to the project that is within 2,000 feet of a major bus stop.

Size
Sub-Total Residential
Sub-Total Retail

6. AM and PM peak-hour trips were based on the driveway counts conducted on September 24, 2024. Daily trips were estimated based on the average AM and PM peak-hour trips multiplied by 10.

Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Trip
Rate
Trip
Rate
Trips Trip
Rate
Trips

5. Pass-by trip reduction is based on the maximum allowable pass-by trip reduction rate in the VTA TIA Guidelines for the daily and PM peak hour. Hexagon assumes no pass-by trip reduction during the AM peak hour for retail uses.

1. Multifamily Housing Not Close to Rail Transit (Mid-Rise) (Land Use 221): average trip rates in trips per dwelling unit (du) are used.

Mountain View
1 2
3 5
4 6
11 7
8 9
10 Church St
Castro St
W El Camino Real Calderon Ave
Yosemite Ave
W Dana StSnow St
Fairmont Ave
S Shoreline Blvd
High School Way
Miramonte A
ve
Miramonte Ave Hope StHope StMiramonte A
ve
Hope St
25%(25%)
35%(25%)
5%(5%)
15%(15%)
15%(15%)
5%(15%)
X
= Residential(Commercial) Trip Distribution
= Study Intersection
= Site Location
LEGEND
XX%(XX%)
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 7
Project Trip Distribution
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
NORTH
Not to Scale
Figure 8
Net Project Trip and Pass-by Assignment
LEGEND
= AM(PM) Peak-Hour Trips XX(XX)
* Note: Includes Pass-by Trips
9 5
1 67
23 8
4 10 11
St
Casto
Real
Camino
St
Hope
St
Church
Way
School
High
Ave
Fairmont
Ave
Yosemite
El
Ave
Miramonte
Dwy
Project
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Hope
St
Hope
St
Casto
St
Hope
Blvd
Shoreline
Blvd
Shoreline
St
Church
Real
Camino
El
Ave
Yosemite
Ave
Fairmont
Real
Camino
El
0(2)
0(-4*) 3(5*)
18(13*)
10(4)
-2(11*)
0(-3*)
-1(14*)
-1(-1)
0(-4*)
8(11*)
0(-4*)
0(-3*)
8(14*)
2(10*)
0(-1*)
0(-3)
7(9*)
9(9*)
3(2)
1(3)
0(-3)
13(26*)
0(-4)
12(12*)
14(30*)
-1(-1)
0(-1)
-1(-4)
31(25*) 0(-3*)
9(17*)
18(10)
5(3*)
2(1)
-2(2)
3(7)
3(7)
-5(-1) 5(4)
-5(-1) 10(4)
3(9)
9(21*)
0(-4)
-1(-9)
14(35*)
12(12*)
33(34*)
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 24
Diverted Traffic
The project would close Fairmont Avenue to motor vehicle traffic between Castro Street and Hope Street. The traffic on Fairmont that would be diverted to Yosemite Avenue and El Camino Real was estimated using the peak-hour intersection counts on Fairmont Avenue at Castro Street and Hope Street.

It is expected that the traffic traveling southbound and northbound on Castro Street and turning onto eastbound Fairmont Avenue would be relocated to Yosemite Avenue and El Camino Real, respectively.

Roadway Network
The lane configurations of the study intersections under project conditions would be the same as existing conditions, except the Castro Street/Fairmont Avenue and Hope Street/Fairmont Avenue intersections, where the project would close Fairmont Avenue to motor vehicle traffic between these two intersections. Although the El Camino Real Streetscape Plan (Caltrans project) is in progress in the study area, these improvements would not change the study intersection lane configurations, and the project would not alter the existing intersection lane configurations.

Traffic Volumes
Background Traffic Volumes
Background traffic volumes for the study intersections (see Figure 10) were estimated by adding to the existing traffic volumes the trips generated by nearby approved projects that have not been constructed or occupied.

Lists of approved projects were obtained from the Cities of Mountain View and Los Altos. Hexagon considered both the location and size of the approved projects in order to eliminate those that were too far away or too small to affect traffic conditions of the study intersections. The approved projects considered for the study are listed in Appendix C. Vehicle trips from the approved projects were obtained from the project’s TIA or environmental document (Initial Study or EIR), if available. For projects without a traffic study, trip estimates were developed using rates published in the Trip Generation Manual. The estimated trips were assigned to the study intersections according to distributions identified in the development traffic studies, if available, or knowledge of the study area.

The approved trips and traffic volumes for all components of traffic are tabulated in Appendix C.

Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes
Project trips, as represented in the above project trip assignment, were added to background traffic volumes to obtain background plus project traffic volumes (see Figure 11).

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 9
Diverted Traffic From Fairmont Avenue
= Site Location
LEGEND
= AM(PM) Peak-Hour Diverted Trips from Existing VolumesXX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Diverted Trips from Remaining
Surface Parking Area
XX(XX)
X = Study IntersectionSt
Casto
Ave
Fairmont
-4(-24)
-2(-2)
St
Casto
Ave
Yosemite
2(2) 0(4)
Ave
Fairmont
St
Hope 2(2)
-2(-10)
-4(-20)
0(-4)
St
Casto
Real
Camino
El
0(4) 0(-4)
-4(-24)
4(24)
Way
School
High
St
Casto
0(4)
-2(-2)
-2(2)
St
Hope
Ave
Yosemite
0(-4)
0(4)
2(2)
St
Hope
Real
Camino
El
0(-4)
4(24)
El Camino Re
al
El Camino RealEl Camino Re
al
High School WayHigh School WayHigh School Way
0(-8)
0(4)0(4)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 NORTH
Not to Scale
9 5
1 6 7
2 3
8 4
10 St
Casto
Real
Camino
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
St
Hope
Figure 10
Background Traffic Volumes
St
Church
Way
School
High
Ave
Fairmont
Ave
Yosemite
El
Ave
Miramonte
11 Dwy
Project
LEGEND
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Hope
St
Hope
St
Casto
St
Hope
Blvd
Shoreline
Blvd
Shoreline
St
Church
Real
Camino
El
Ave
Yosemite
Ave
Fairmont
Real
Camino
El
= AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes XX(XX)
95(49)
121(112)
177(115)
116(213)
69(107)
41(62)
143(204)
1046(1307)
230(151)
119(103)
1001(1158)
44(42)
438(332)
5(25)
2(2)
214(390)
77(65)
361(274)
162(302)
38(26)
11(20)
57(94)
349(276)
24(20)
14(8)
174(293)
25(38)
9(11)
9(14)
28(33)
0(1)
0(1)
10(11)
5(12)
0(2)
13(20)
1(1)
8(8)
14(20)
3(0)
0(4)
35(39)
3(4)
1(3)
9(7)
2(1)
2(2)
0(4)
0(10)
4(20)
1(8)
4(19)
3(17) 1564(1675)
36(36)
1266(1520)
20(10)
80(60)
229(177)
49(48)
4(6)
99(166)
14(23)
32(45)
80(77)
21(18)
22(23)
78(91)
56(85)
23(16)
683(562)
36(51)
130(145)
635(734)
12(15)
30(64)
25(34)
88(112)
26(23)
36(56)
81(29)
145(132)
297(188)
50(24)
172(173)
331(351)
226(314)
114(114)
1112(1182)
116(112)
303(304)
786(1090)
127(147)
36(36)
3(17)
NORTH
Not to Scale
9 5
1 6 7
2 3
8 4
10 St
Casto
Real
Camino
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
St
Hope
Figure 11
Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes
St
Church
Way
School
High
Ave
Fairmont
Ave
Yosemite
El
Ave
Miramonte
11 Dwy
Project
LEGEND
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Casto
St
Hope
St
Hope
St
Casto
St
Hope
Blvd
Shoreline
Blvd
Shoreline
St
Church
Real
Camino
El
Ave
Yosemite
Ave
Fairmont
Real
Camino
El
= AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes XX(XX)
*Note: Includes Passby Trips
95(49)
121(114)
177(115)
116(213)
69(103)
41(66)
164(221)
1056(1308)
230(151)
112(90)
1005(1179)
44(42)
437(346)
214(390)
77(65)
369(285)
160(300)
38(26)
11(20)
57(94)
349(273)
32(34)
18(20)
172(290)
25(39)
16(20)
18(23)
31(30)
0(1)
0(1)
11(15)
5(12)
0(2)
13(20)
1(1)
8(11)
14(20)
18(28)
47(51)
3(4)
3(5)
23(37)
1(0)
2(2)
0(4)
4(19)
34(38) 1564(1672)
45(53)
1288(1554)
20(10)
85(63)
230(178)
49(48)
4(6)
97(168)
14(23)
32(45)
80(77)
21(18)
22(23)
78(91)
59(92)
23(16)
683(562)
36(51)
133(152)
629(733)
12(15)
30(64)
25(34)
93(116)
26(23)
36(56)
81(29)
145(132)
297(188)
50(24)
166(172)
331(351)
226(314)
114(114)
1122(1187)
116(112)
303(304)
789(1099)
127(147)
9(21)
36(32)
2(8)
14(35)
12(12)
33(34)
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 28
Intersection Levels of Service
The results of the intersection level of service analysis (see Table 6) show that all study intersections would operate at acceptable levels during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic under background and background plus project conditions. The background plus project analysis accounts for the diverted trips previously discussed. The critical delay and v/c increase for unsignalized intersections are not calculated, as these values only determine the adverse effect at signalized intersections. The intersection level of service calculation sheets for the project are included in Appendix B.

There are some signalized intersections for which the average delay under project conditions is shown to be less than under no project conditions during at least one peak hour. The average delay can be less under project conditions because the intersection delay is a weighted average of all intersection movements. The addition of project traffic to movements with delays lower than the average intersection delay can reduce the average delay for the entire intersection. There are some signalized intersections for which the critical delay under project conditions is shown to be less than no project conditions. This is because the project trips are assigned to the non-critical movements of the intersection.

Signal Warrant Analysis At Unsignalized Intersections
Traffic operations at the unsignalized intersections were also analyzed on the basis of the Peak-Hour Volume Signal Warrant, (Warrant #3) described in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2014 Edition. This method makes no evaluation of intersection level of service, but simply provides an indication whether peak-hour traffic volumes are, or would be, sufficient to justify installation of a traffic signal. The results of the peak-hour volume signal warrant analysis indicate that none of the unsignalized intersections would meet the signal warrant under any scenario (see Appendix E).
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 29
Table 6
Background Intersection Levels of Service

Intersection Queuing Analysis
The analysis of intersection operations was supplemented with a vehicle queuing analysis for intersections where the project would add a substantial number of trips to the left-turn movements or stop-controlled movements. This analysis provides a basis for estimating future storage requirements at the intersections under existing, background, and project conditions. Vehicle queues were estimated using a Poisson probability distribution, described in Chapter 1. The westbound left-turn movement from El Camino Real to Castro Street was evaluated, and the results of the queueing analysis are summarized in Table 7. The queuing analysis indicates that the existing queuing deficiency would be exacerbated by the project at the intersection. Although this is a CMP intersection, as described below, the small increase in vehicle queueing would not cause an adverse effect on traffic operations of the intersection.

Castro Street and El Camino Real – Westbound Left Turn
The existing storage capacity for the westbound left-turn lane on El Camino Real at Castro Street is approximately 350 feet (14 vehicles). Under existing conditions, the 95th percentile queue exceeds the LOS Peak Avg. Avg. Incr. In Incr. In
ID Intersection Standard Hour Delay1 LOS Delay1 LOS Crit. Del.4 Crit. V/C4 1 Castro St and El Camino Real* E AM 42.7 D 43.1 D -0.6 -0.002 PM 40.7 D 40.2 D 0.6 0.016
2 Castro St and Fairmont Ave2 D AM 8.2 A -- -- -- --
(one-way stop control) PM 8.0 A -- -- -- --
3 Castro St and High School Way D AM 10.5 B 10.5 B -- -- (one-way stop control) PM 12.0 B 12.0 B -- --
4 Castro St and Yosemite Ave D AM 12.3 B 12.2 B -- --
(one-way stop control) PM 12.8 B 12.8 B -- --
5 Hope St and Yosemite Ave D AM 9.3 A 9.4 A -- --
(two-way stop control) PM 9.5 A 9.6 A -- --
6 Hope St and Fairmont Ave3 D AM 9.1 A 8.9 A -- --
(two-way stop control) PM 9.2 A 8.7 A -- --
7 Hope St and El Camino Real D AM 12.4 B 12.9 B -- --
(one-way stop control) PM 13.0 B 13.5 B -- --
8 E AM 16.3 B 16.4 B 0.1 0.003
PM 19.2 B 19.3 B 0.1 0.009
9 Shoreline Blvd and Church St D AM 19.4 B 19.5 B 0.2 0.002 PM 24.1 C 24.2 C 0.3 0.004
10 E AM 50.4 D 50.1 D -0.4 -0.002
PM 46.1 D 46.0 D 0.0 0.001
11 Hope St and Project Dwy (Future) D AM -- -- 8.6 A -- -- (one-way stop control) PM -- -- 8.7 A -- --
Notes:
* Denotes VTA CMP intersection.

2. With the project, Fairmont Avenue would be closed to vehicle traffic. There would be no opposing traffic for Castro Street.

3. With the project, the west leg of Fairmont Avenue would be closed to vehicle traffic.

4. The critical delay and v/c increase for unsignalized intersections are not calculated, as these values only determine the adverse effect at signalized intersections.

1. Weighted average control delay measured in seconds per vehicle for signalized and all-way stop intersections. Worst approach delay (seconds per vehicle) and LOS are reported for side stop-controlled intersections.

Background Background+Project
Castro St and Church St
Shoreline Blvd/Miramonte Ave and El Camino
Real*
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 30
storage lane by 25 feet, or one vehicle, during the PM peak hour. Under background conditions, the queue would remain the same. The project would add one vehicle to the PM peak-hour queue. Field observations showed that all left-turn vehicles were able to clear the intersection in one cycle and through traffic was not affected. Based on field observations, the small increase is not expected to affect the westbound through traffic as there are three westbound through lanes.

Table 7
Intersection Queuing Analysis Summary

AM PM
Existing
Cycle (sec) 180 170
Volume
(vph) 143 204
95th %. Queue (veh/ln) 12 15
95th %. Queue1 (ft/ln) 300 375
Storage (ft/ln) 350 350
Adequate (

Y/N) Y N
Background
Cycle (sec) 180 170
Volume (vph) 143 204
95th %. Queue (veh/ln) 12 15
95th %. Queue1 (ft/ln) 300 375
Storage (ft/ln) 350 350
Adequate (

Y/N) Y N
Background Plus Project
Cycle (sec) 180 170
Volume (vph) 164 221
95th %. Queue (veh/ln) 13 16
95th %. Queue1 (ft/ln) 325 400
Storage (ft/ln) 350 350
Adequate (

Y/N) Y N
Notes:
1 Assumes 25 feet per vehicle queued.

WBL
Analysis Scenario
WBL = westbound left turn movement.

Castro St & El Camino Real
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 31

4. Other Transportation Issues
This chapter presents other transportation issues associated with the project, including:
• Conformance with the City policies
• Site access and circulation
• Effects on pedestrians, bicycles, and transit facilities • Effects on surrounding neighborhood streets
• Parking
The analyses in this chapter are based on the City’s MTA Handbook and professional judgment in accordance with the standards and methods employed by the traffic engineering community.

Conformance with City Policies
General Plan
The City’s General Plan aims to support the Downtown area. The project is located within the Central Neighborhoods/Downtown Planning Area. The project is in conformance with the General Plan, as described below:
• Connect the Community. The project would support transit access and improve multimodal connectivity through a multi-use paseo that would replace vehicular traffic along Fairmont Avenue and updated crosswalks across the north and east legs of the Hope Street/Fairmont Avenue intersection.
• Develop Around Transit. The project would be within 500 feet of bus stops along El Camino Real and Castro Street.

Downtown Precise Plan (DPP)
The project is located within the Downtown Precise Plan (DPP) Area J (East of Castro Street Frontage), which includes parcels bounded by El Camino Real, Castro Street, Mercy Street, and Hope Street. The project is in conformance with the DPP, as described below:
• Commercial Pedestrian Entrances. The project would provide commercial uses along the Castro Street frontage and residential uses along the Hope Street frontage • Site Access. The project’s driveway would be located along Hope Street, which would avoid curb cuts along Castro Street and El Camino Real.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 32
• On-Site Parking. All parking should be on site and hidden from the project frontage. The parking garage entrance would be on Hope Street, hidden from the project frontage, and the garage would be located underground.
• Service Areas. Trash enclosures and mechanical equipment should be screened and located away from adjacent residential uses. On-site trash bins should be in one area. The project would provide one trash room for residential use in the southeast area of the site, next to the lobby. The trash room would be enclosed and placed along the passenger drop off zone, where garbage trucks would easily be able to access the trash staging area via Hope Street. The project would provide another trash room in the northwest corner of the site for commercial and residential use. Because the paseo would separate the first 3 levels of the building into a north side and south side, two separate trash areas would be acceptable.

Downtown Lighting Study
The 2020 Downtown Lighting Study analyzed the Downtown area bounded by Evelyn Avenue in the north, Franklin Street in the west, El Camino Real in the south, and View Street in the east. Because the area is a popular spot for late night attractions, the City evaluated the areas where the lighting levels are lower than desired. The study recommends lighting design criteria for intersections based on the street classifications and for pedestrian areas and bikeways based on the pedestrian classifications.

El Camino Real is a major street with a high pedestrian level; Castro Street and as a collector street with a median pedestrian level; Hope Street is a local street with a median pedestrian level, and Fairmont Avenue and Yosemite Avenue are local streets with a low pedestrian level. A major/collector intersection with a high pedestrian level requires higher illumination than a local/local intersection with a low pedestrian level. Sidewalks adjacent to roadways with a high pedestrian level requires high illumination than sidewalks and pathways in low pedestrian areas.

Within the project vicinity, the City identified additional lighting should be installed at the following uncontrolled crosswalks along Castro Street: Castro Street at High School Way/Yosemite Avenue (2 crosswalks) and Castro Street between Church Street and Yosemite Avenue. In addition, the lighting along Castro Street and Hope Street would also require enhancing. Lighting enhancements would include adding more light posts and retrofitting existing light posts with more energy and optically efficient lights.

The project would maintain the existing streetlights along Castro Street and El Camino Real and add in recessed lighting along the pedestrian walking path on site in front of the commercial uses on Castro Street and El Camino Real and pedestrian scale lighting along Hope Street. There would also be various lighting additions within the site, including along the multi-use paseo. The project would have to update the existing light posts and add more light posts on the sidewalks along the Castro Street and Hope Street frontages to conform with the downtown lighting plan. The proposed lightings along the along the multi-use paseo should also meet the lighting design criteria for pedestrian pathways.

Site Access and Circulation
A review of the project site plan was performed to determine if adequate vehicle site access and on-site circulation would be provided and to identify any access or circulation issues that should be improved.

This review is based on the site plan dated September 30, 2024, presented on Figure 2 and in accordance with generally accepted traffic engineering standards.

Vehicular Site Access
Vehicle access to the project site would be provided via a new driveway on Hope Street between Fairmont Avenue and El Camino Real. The project would remove the existing driveways on Hope 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 33
Street and El Camino Real and close Fairmont Avenue to motor vehicular traffic between Castro Street and Hope Street. Most areas within the DPP require a maximum 22-foot two-way driveway, unless additional width is required for safety and operations. DPP Area J, where the project site would be, does not have a requirement for driveway width. Based on the City’s Zoning Code, driveways should be a minimum of 18 feet, with no maximum requirement. The project’s driveway would be 25 feet wide, which would satisfy the City’s requirement.

Traffic Operations at the Project Driveway
Traffic operations at the project driveway were evaluated to identify whether there would be vehicle queuing issues. The gross site trips that would occur at the project driveway are 23 inbound trips and 45 outbound trips during the AM peak hour, and 56 inbound trips and 46 outbound trips during the PM peak hour (see Figure 8 for Intersection 11). The PM peak-hour trips include the pass-by trips.

The northbound left-turn trips (9 AM and 21 PM peak-hour trips) are expected to have a vehicle delay of 7.2 seconds and 7.3 seconds per vehicle during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Because of the small number of left-turn trips accessing the driveway, the short delay is not expected to affect traffic flow on northbound Hope Street and, subsequently, vehicles turning onto Hope Street from El Camino Real. Vehicles turning right into the project site from southbound Hope Street may slow traffic in the travel lane momentarily due to vehicles slowing down to turn into the driveway. However, this would not have a significant effect on traffic operations because of the small amount of traffic on Hope Street.

Some minor on-site vehicle queuing could occur for outbound traffic. Given the estimated 46 outbound trips in the PM peak hour at the driveway, which calculates to about one outbound trip every 78 seconds, the probability of two or more outbound vehicles exiting the site at the same time would be low. The garage access ramp between the sidewalk and the drive aisle in the parking garage would accommodate three vehicles. Therefore, the outbound vehicle queue is not expected to affect the on- site circulation.

Sight Distance at Project Driveway
The project driveway should be free and clear of any obstructions to provide adequate sight distance, thereby ensuring that exiting vehicles can see pedestrians on the sidewalk and vehicles and bicycles traveling on Hope Street. Providing the appropriate sight distance reduces the likelihood of a collision at a driveway and provides drivers with the ability to locate sufficient gaps in traffic and exit a driveway.

According to the City’s Standard Detail A-22, any landscaping, structures and signage within the pedestrian triangle and vehicle triangle at the driveway should be no taller than 3 feet and located in such a way to ensure an unobstructed view for drivers exiting the site, and street trees must have a high canopy of at least 6 feet. The landscaping features shown on the site plan are not expected to obstruct the vision of exiting drivers provided the landscaping is also kept at a low level within the pedestrian triangle and vehicle triangle at the driveway.

Pedestrian triangles are measured 25 feet from the back of the sidewalk and 25 feet to both sides of a driveway. The walls of the garage entrance would be within the pedestrian triangles and are likely to limit visibility for exiting vehicles to see pedestrians on the sidewalks. To ensure pedestrian safety, the site plan shows that the project driveway would be stop-controlled with a stop bar marking at the back of the sidewalk and the garage walls should be less than 3 feet in height.

According to the City’s Standard Detail A-22, the stopping sight distance on Hope Street should be 150 feet due to the 25-mph speed limit. Thus, a driver must be able to see 150 feet looking in either direction out of the driveway to locate a sufficient gap to turn out of the driveway. There is no roadway curve on Hope Street that would obstruct the vision of exiting drivers, and on-street parking near the 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 34
driveway would be prohibited for at least 10 feet, with a loading zone beginning 30 feet south of the driveway. The project should restrict parking for the entire 30 feet between the driveway and the loading zone. A large delivery vehicle in the loading zone may potentially block the view of exiting vehicles at the project driveway to see vehicles turning right from El Camino Real to Hope Street.

However, loading vehicles are not expected to constantly occupy the space. The project driveway would be offset from the Fairmont Avenue intersection. Because exiting vehicles would be able to see vehicles traveling on Fairmont Avenue, exiting vehicles would have adequate sight distance.

Corner Visibility at Intersections
The project site fronts the corner of the Hope Street/El Camino Real intersection. The intersection corner should be free and clear of any obstructions to optimize corner visibility per the City’s Standard Details A-23, thereby ensuring the vehicles approaching the intersection can see other vehicles or bicycles traveling on the cross street. Any landscaping and signage within the safety visibility triangle at the intersection corners should be no taller than 3 feet and in such a way to ensure an unobstructed view for drivers on the street.

According to the site plan, the landscape plan shows landscaping would be added to the Hope Street/El Camino Real intersection. No building structure would be located within the corner visibility triangles (35 feet from the right-of-way) and the landscaping provided at the corners would be less than 3 feet tall within the corner visibility triangles, which would maintain the required sight distance.

Vehicle On-Site Circulation
Within the site, two-way 26-foot drive aisles would be provided within the parking garage. The width of all drive aisles meets the City of Mountain View minimum requirement (24 feet) for 90-degree parking spaces on double-loaded drive aisles with two-way traffic. The parking stalls throughout the site would be 90-degree uniform parking stalls. The stall depth (20 feet) of the parking spaces would meet City’s minimum standard (18 feet).

The ramp to the underground garage is shown to be 26 feet wide, which is adequate for two-way traffic.

The site plan shows one ramp within each level of the residential garage (see Figure 14), which would be 22 feet wide. The slope of the ramp between the ground level and level B1 would be 15 percent with a 7.5 percent transition slope to prevent vehicles from bottoming out. The slope between levels P1 and P2 is unknown; however, there would also be transition slopes.

On-site vehicle circulation was also evaluated to identify whether there are dead-end aisles within the parking garages (see Figure 12). Dead-end aisles are undesirable because drivers can enter the aisle, and upon discovering that there is no available parking, must back out or conduct three-point turns. The garage plan shows dead-end aisles on both levels B1 and B2. However, the project would provide a turnaround space at each dead-end aisle, which would provide adequate circulation.

Parking for retail patrons would be located on level B1 of the parking garage, indicated by signage.

Residential parking stalls would be reserved by unit, located on both levels B1 and B2.

Loading Zone on Hope Street
The site plan indicates a loading zone along the project frontage on Hope Street, just south of the driveway, which would be convenient for people accessing the site using Uber/Lyft or other rideshare apps (e.g., Scoop, Bay Area Carpool). The site plan does not indicate if the loading zone would be limited to only freight loading. The loading zone should be signed for both freight and passenger loading.

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 12
Parking Garage Plans
Basement Level B2
110 Stalls
Basement Level B1
90 Stalls
'1
9$1
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9

83 9$1
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(99$1
(9
(9
(9
(99$1
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9
(9

7<3,&$/
7<3,&$/

&200(5&,$/
/2$',1*
63$&(
Bike
Storage
Room
Bike
Storage
Room
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 36
The loading zone on Hope Street would be 80-foot long and approximately 8.5 feet wide, beginning 30 feet south of the proposed project driveway. Currently, on-street parking is permitted along both sides of Hope Street, south of Fairmont Avenue. Thus, vehicles accessing the loading area are not expected to have an adverse effect on traffic flow along southbound Hope Street as vehicles currently pull over to park. In addition, southbound vehicles are expected to travel slower to approach El Camino Real due to the stop-control. The project would install a raised crosswalk along the north leg of the Hope Street/Fairmont Avenue intersection, which would also provide traffic calming and slow vehicular speed.

An adjacent development project at 969 Hope Street will install a curb cut for trash pick-up on Hope Street across the project’s loading zone. The project’s loading zone would need to coordinate with the future curb cut at 969 Hope Street.

Truck Access and Circulation
Emergency response vehicles would access the project site from El Camino Real, Castro Street, Hope Street, and the project driveway.

The City requires one loading space for commercial, industrial, institutional, and service uses of 10,000 to 30,000 square feet. Thus, the proposed commercial space would not require a loading space.

The project would provide one residential trash room near the project driveway and one commercial and residential trash room in the northern area of the site. Staff would move the trash bins from the trash enclosures to the staging areas accessed from Castro Street for the north side and Hope Street for the south side on garbage collection days. Trash collection would occur on the street.

Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Facility Assessment
The following describes the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities that serve the site and evaluates whether appropriate bicycle and pedestrian access and transit service are provided between the site and nearby destinations.

Pedestrian Operations
Pedestrian Access and Circulation
Pedestrian access to the project site is provided via sidewalks on El Camino Real, Castro Street, Hope Street, and surrounding streets. Pedestrian walkways would be provided through the site that provide pedestrian access from the project frontage streets to elevators and stairways to the residential units, amenities, and commercial uses (see Figure 2). The project would also provide a multi-use paseo which would replace vehicular traffic on Fairmont Avenue between Castro Street and Hope Street. The multi-use paseo would connect to the new proposed curb ramp on the northwest corner of Hope Street at Fairmont Avenue. The project would provide 12-foot-wide sidewalks (7-foot walk zone and 5-foot landscaping) on El Camino Real between Hope Street and the existing Gateway Park, 21-foot sidewalks (10-foot walk zone and 11-foot landscaping/bike parking/art) on Castro Street, and 13-foot sidewalks (8-foot walk zone and 5-foot landscaping) on Hope Street. The project would provide new high visibility crosswalks on the north and east legs of the Hope Street/Fairmont Avenue intersection.

The crosswalk along the north leg is proposed as a raised crosswalk.

ADA Access
Within 0.5 mile of the project site, curb ramps are present at the signalized intersections on El Camino Real between Shoreline Boulevard and Calderon Avenue, on Castro Street between Miramonte Avenue and California Street, and on Hope Street between El Camino Real and California Street. 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 37
Some corners meet current ADA curb ramp designs, such as truncated domes and adequate curb ramp slopes. Truncated domes are the standard design requirement for detectable warnings which enable people with visual disabilities to determine the boundary between the sidewalk and the street.

The following signalized intersections in the project vicinity include at least one corner that does not include truncated domes, and the ramp slope of these ramps do not appear to meet the current ADA standard:
• Shoreline Boulevard and El Camino Real
• Calderon Avenue and El Camino Real
• Castro Street and Mercy Street
• Castro Street and California Street
The project would build new curb ramps at all corners of Hope Street/Fairmont Avenue intersection.

The curb ramps at Castro Street/Mercy Street and Castro Street/California Street will be updated by the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Caltrans is also expected to install new curb ramps at the northeast corner of the Castro Street/El Camino Real intersection and both corners at the Hope Street/El Camino Real intersection. The new curb ramps would be built to ADA standards.

Pedestrian Infrastructure, Safety, and User Experience
Pedestrian facilities in the study area consist of sidewalks and crosswalks. A complete network of sidewalks is present along all of the surrounding streets. Crosswalks with pedestrian signal heads are located at all of the signalized intersections in the project vicinity. High-visibility midblock crosswalks are available on Castro Street at Yosemite Avenue. The project would provide new high visibility crosswalks at the Hope Street/Fairmont Avenue intersection.

The project would install an east-west multi-use paseo along the center of the project site, across Fairmont Avenue. The paseo would better connect pedestrians and bicyclists to the planned bike lanes along Castro Street, as well as the retail and restaurant uses along Castro Street.

According to the 2012 General Plan, a neighborhood is walkable when people can travel comfortably and safely on foot to many destinations. Convenient walking distance is considered to be a half mile to a mile, a walk that would take 10 to 20 minutes. Within a half mile of the project site, there are a few restaurants and retail stores (on El Camino Real and in Downtown Mountain View) and bus stops on El Camino Real and Castro Street.

Although located within one-half mile, access to some of the surrounding land uses and bus stops would require crossing busy arterial streets (El Camino Real). The wide street might be uncomfortable for some pedestrians to cross, but signalized crosswalks are available at the Castro Street/El Camino Real intersection. The City’s CIP 2024-25 includes a project (CIP 25-30) to design it as a protected intersection (El Camino Real/Castro Street Protected Intersection and Castro Bikeway Improvements at Yosemite/High School Project).

Pedestrian Quality of Service
According to the City’s MTA Handbook, a project woud result in an adverse effect on pedestrian operations if the project increases vehicle trips to a roadway with a pedestrian quality of service (PQOS) score of 3 or more.

PQOS identifies the level of comfort for pedestrians on any given roadway. Mountain View’s Comprehensive Modal Plan (AccessMV), published in May 2021, includes a PQOS map (see Figure 13) that shows continuity or gaps in the pedestrian facilities as indicated with a PQOS score ranging from 1 to 5. A higher PQOS score indicates a low quality of service. 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 13
Pedestrian Quality of Service (PQOS) Map
Project Boundary
Source: City of Mountain View AccessMV Plan (May 2021)
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 39
The PQOS metric in the AccessMV document covers the following factors:
• Proximity to a variety of destinations and amenities
• Street connectivity and directness of routes to destinations • Presence of a continuous network of pedestrian facilities • Motor vehicle traffic speed; and
• Street width and intersection conditions
Based on the PQOS map, the following streets in the project vicinity have a PQOS greater than 2, which is not desirable:
• El Camino Real (PQOS 5)
• Shoreline Boulevard north of El Camino Real (PQOS 4 and 5) • Castro Street south of El Camino Real (PQOS 3)
The project would have an adverse effect on pedestrian operations because the project is expected to add vehicle trips to these street segments that have a PQOS score of 3 or more.

The project would provide wider sidewalks with landscaping along the project frontage to enhance the pedestrian environment. Taking this into account, the project is expected to improve the PQOS along El Camino Real along the project frontage. In addition, Caltrans would build new ADA curb ramps along the project frontage at the Hope Street/El Camino Real and Castro Street/El Camino Real intersections.

Bicycle Operations
Bicycle Access and Circulation
Bicycle access to the project site is via bike lanes on Shoreline Boulevard, Calderon Avenue, and Castro Street and the bike route on Church that connect cyclists from the project site to the surrounding areas. The site plan shows that a buffered bike lane would eventually be installed along Castro Street as approved under CIP 25-30, which includes this segment with buffered bike lane design. The design alternatives are still under consideration; however, under all design alternatives, protected intersection treatments would be installed at the Castro Street/El Camino Real intersection and protected or separated bike lanes would be provided along Castro Street. The project would provide a secure bicycle storage room on the ground level of the building north of the paseo and a bicycle storage room in levels B1 and B2 of the garage.

Short-term bicycle racks would be placed in well-lit, highly visible locations along Castro Street and within the paseo.

Bicycle Infrastructure and Safety
In the immediate project vicinity, there are bike lanes on Calderon Avenue/Phyllis Avenue, Shoreline Boulevard, and Castro Street (south of El Camino Real).

The 2015 Bicycle Transportation Plan Update evaluates the quality of the bicycle network in the City in terms of connectivity gaps and low stress gaps. The plan identifies spot gaps, corridor gaps, and quality gaps along El Camino Real, Castro Street, and Calderon Avenue. Spot gaps refer to point-specific locations lacking dedicated bicycle facilities or other treatments to accommodate safe and comfortable bicycle travel. Corridor gaps are missing links longer than one mile, while quality gaps are links of an existing bikeway that are deficient or have operational shortcomings. A buffered bicycle lane will be installed along El Camino Real via the El Camino Real Streetscape Plan and along Castro Street under approved CIP 25-30. It is expected that these bicycle-friendly infrastructures would improve the quality of the bicycle network in the area.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 40
Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress
According to the City’s MTA Handbook, a project woud result in an adverse effect on bicycle operations if the project increases vehicle trips to a roadway with a bicycle level of traffic stress (BLTS) score of 3 or 4, or the project would not connect to the City’s low-street (BLTS 1 to 2) bike network.

The City’s AccessMV report includes a BLTS map (see Figure 14) to identify the perceived comfort and safety of existing roads and bikeway facilities from the perspective of cyclists, as indicated with a BLTS score ranging from 1 to 4. A higher BLTS score indicates that the bikeway is comfortable for a more confident adult. A BLTS score of 1 is comfortable for all ages and abilities, a BLTS score of 2 is comfortable for an average adult, while a BLTS score of 4 indicates that the streets are comfortable only for highly confident riders. The metric (ranging from 1 to 4) in the AccessMV document covers the following factors:
• Number of through lanes or street width
• Posted speed limit or prevailing vehicle speed
• Presence and type of bicycle facilities
• Presence of traffic signals
Based on the BLTS map, the following streets in the project vicinity have a BLTS greater than 2, which is undesirable:
• El Camino Real (BLTS 4)
• Castro Street between Church Street and California Street (BLTS 3) • Shoreline Boulevard (BLTS 3)
The project would create an adverse effect on bicycle operations, as the project is expected to add vehicle trips to these street segments.

The AccessMV plan includes a BLTS map considering the planned bicycle facilities listed in the VTA Countywide Bicycle Plan (2018), the City of Mountain View Bicycle Transportation Plan (2015), the Caltrain Bicycle Access and Parking Plan (2008), and several area precise plans. In addition, the El Camino Real Streetscape Plan is currently being integrated and new buffered bike lanes would be installed. With the planned improvements identified in these documents, El Camino Real is expected to have a BLTS score of 2 and Shoreline Boulevard between El Camino Real and Wright Avenue is expected to have a BLTS score of 1.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Access to Schools and Nearby Parks The project site is located within the boundary of Landels Elementary School, Graham Middle School, and Mountain View High School, which are about 1.0-mile northeast, 0.4-mile south, and 2.4 miles southeast of the project site, respectively. Continuous sidewalks and crosswalks are present between the site and the elementary and middle schools. According to the City’s suggested routes to schools, elementary school students would use Castro Street, Church Street, Bush Street, and Mercy Street.

However, the elementary school would be out of reasonable walking distance (0.5 mile or 10 minutes).

Middle School students would use Castro Street. Mountain View High School is not within reasonable walking distance of the project site. However, some high school students may wish to bike to school.

Bicyclists would have to travel with caution along El Camino Real until reaching the Phyllis Avenue bike lanes and following the City’s suggested route using Martens Avenue, Yorkshire Way, Sleeper Avenue, Franklin Avenue, and Diericx Drive to Mountain View High School.

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA
Figure 14
Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS) Map
Project Boundary
Source: City of Mountain View AccessMV Plan (May 2021)
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 42
The project site is approximately 0.2 mile east from Eagle Park, located between Church Street and High School Way east of Shoreline Boulevard and 0.2 mile southeast from Pioneer Memorial Park, located on Church Street west of Castro Street. Pedestrian access to Eagle Park is provided via Castro Street, Hope Street, Church Street, and High School Way. There are continuous sidewalks between Eagle Park and the project site, and high visibility crosswalks are available crossing Castro Street and High School Way/Yosemite Avenue. There are no bicycle facilities between the site and the park.

However, bicyclists could travel along Castro Street, Hope Street, Church Street, and High School Way. Similarly, pedestrian access to Pioneer Memorial Park is provided via Castro Street, Hope Street, and Church Street. Although there are no bicycle facilities, bicyclists could use these streets.

Transit Operations
Transit Facilities, Service, and Access
The project site is served by VTA Routes 22, 51, 52, and 522 with bus stops located on El Camino Real and Castro Street and is located within one mile of the Mountain View Transit Center. According to the California Public Resources Code Section 21155, a high-quality transit corridor is defined as a corridor with fixed route bus service with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during peak commute periods. Therefore, the project is located in a transit proximity area because it is within a half mile of bus stops along El Camino Real that serve routes 22 and 522.

Transit Ridership
It is expected that the project would generate some transit trips to get to the employment areas or to other destinations. According to VTA TIA Guidelines, approximately two percent of residents in housing within 2,000 feet of a major bus stop are expected to utilize transit. The increase in transit ridership from this project would be minimal (one transit rider per hour) and would be accommodated by the currently available capacity of the bus services in the study area.

Effects on Surrounding Neighborhood Streets
Vehicle access to the project site is via El Camino Real, Castro Street, and Hope Street. Hope Street is a local street that mostly serves residential developments, including the project’s residential use. El Camino Real and Castro Street are already serving office, commercial, and residential uses in the project vicinity. Thus, project trips traveling on Castro Street, El Camino Real, and Hope Street would not be considered cut-through traffic. Yosemite Avenue and Fairmont Avenue would provide access to Hope Street; however, neither street connects to other major streets. Therefore, the project is not expected to cause an adverse effect or cut-through traffic issues on the surrounding neighborhood streets.

Fairmont Avenue Closure
The project would close the existing Fairmont Avenue to motor vehicular traffic between Castro Street and Hope Avenue. It currently serves the existing commercial and residential buildings to be demolished as part of the project, and a small surface parking lot between Yosemite Avenue and Fairmont Avenue. As previously described, traffic traveling southbound and northbound on Castro Street and turning onto eastbound Fairmont Avenue would be diverted to Yosemite Avenue and El Camino Real, respectively. Traffic traveling southbound Castro Street and turning onto eastbound Fairmont Avenue would make southbound left turns onto Yosemite Avenue instead. Traffic traveling northbound Castro Street and turning onto eastbound Fairmont Avenue would continue eastbound El Camino Real and make eastbound left turns at downstream intersections to get back to the neighborhoods east of the project site.
881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 43
Because traffic along Fairmont Avenue between Castro Street and Hope Avenue is low, based on the traffic counts conducted in September 2024, the diverted traffic is not expected to cause an adverse effect to the diverted intersections, as shown previously in the level of service summary.

Parking
Vehicle Parking
Vehicle parking for the project was reviewed per the City of Mountain View and State of California requirements. For multi-family residential units, the DPP originally required the following minimum parking ratios:
• 1.5 spaces for each studio and one-bedroom unit,
• 2 spaces for two- or more bedroom units,
• Plus 0.3 space per unit for guest parking.

Because the project would provide 20% of the units as below market rate units, the project can qualify for the State Density Bonus Law. Per Public Resources Code Section 65915 (p) (1)), the City may not impose minimum vehicular parking ratios that exceed the following ratios:
• 1.0 space for studio and one-bedroom units
• 1.5 spaces for two-to-three-bedroom units
• 2.5 spaces for four or more-bedroom units
For retail use, the DPP requires one space per 300 square feet. Based on this ratio, the proposed 9,776 s.f. of retail space would require 33 parking spaces.

The California Assembly Bill 2097, which was approved on September 22, 2022, prohibits a public agency from imposing any minimum automobile parking requirement on any residential, commercial, or other development project, as defined, that is located within ½ mile of public transit. The project is located within ½ mile of the intersection of two major bus routes (Route 22 and Route 522) with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods. Furthermore, on November 12, 2024, the City approved Resolution No. 18945, which amended the DPP to eliminate the minimum parking requirements for residential developments or any residential component of a mixed-use development. Thus, the project is not subject to any minimum automobile parking requirements for the residential use.

Bicycle Parking
The bicycle parking requirements for the project were calculated based on the City of Mountain View Zoning Ordinance, Section 36.32.50 (see Table 14). The residential bicycle parking requirements are one long-term space per unit and one short-term space per 10 units. Thus, the residential use would require 140 long-term spaces and 14 short-term spaces. For commercial uses, the City’s bicycle parking requirement is 5% of the vehicle parking spaces. Thus, the project would require 2 bicycle parking spaces for commercial use. The zoning code does not specify the requirements for long-term and short-term parking for commercial uses, which are based on the City’s Bicycle Parking Guidelines.

The project would provide 160 long-term bicycle parking spaces within bicycle storage rooms on the ground level in the building north of the paseo and within storage rooms on levels B1 and B2 of the garage. The project should provide all long-term bicycle parking on the ground level for easy access.

The project would provide 22 bike racks (44 short-term parking spaces) within the site in well-lit, highly visible locations surrounding the property along Castro Street and the multi-use paseo. Therefore, the proposed number of bicycle parking spaces would meet the City’s bicycle parking requirement. 881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development MTA May 2, 2025 Page | 44
Recommendation
As allowed per state legislation, the project should consider the following recommendation resulting from the site plan review.

Recommendation
• The proposed loading zone on Hope Street shall be designed for both freight and passenger loading. The project shall coordinate with any future curb cuts on adjacent projects (e.g., for trash pickup from the proposed development at 969 Hope Street) to better facilitate the proposed loading zone and provide more functional access on Hope Street. • Lighting on public rights of way must comply with the Downtown lighting standards. Given that the multi-use paseo will provide a public connection between Castro Street and Hope Street, it is recommended that the proposed lighting along the paseo also meet the downtown lighting design criteria for pedestrian pathways, if feasible.
• It is recommended the applicant coordinate with the adjacent property owner, north of the project site on Castro Street, 805 Castro, to update the surface parking area to the rear of the building, so traffic can better enter and exit the parking area via Yosemite Avenue. The existing configuration is designed for through access to Fairmont Avenue, which will no longer be available with the proposed project.
• Though the project meets long-term bicycle parking requirements, it is recommended the project provide long-term bicycle parking at grade for improved access and fewer conflicts with onsite vehicle movements, if feasible.

881 Castro Street Mixed-Use Development
Multi-modal Transportation Analysis

Technical Appendices

May 2, 2025

Appendix A

Traffic Counts

CASTRO ST CASTRO STEL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 1 CASTRO ST & EL CAMINO REAL AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
211 414
1,396
1,304
385234
1,157
1,197

0.91 N
S
E W

0.76 0.96

0.65 0.90
(994)(543)
(3,801)
(3,113)
(3,251)
(2,759)
(693)(438)
39 0
105
207
1,046
122
44 1,001
94 21
18 6794
113
177
1 EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
12 78
10 40
N
S
E W
2256
46 6 6
20 20
0 1
11 0
19 0
1 0
0 15
0 1
0 0
0 16
N
S
EW
0 0
0 1
18 1
16 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 2 4 0 9 32 7 108 5 7 217 406 0 3 2 02,1721 31 2 8 7:15 AM 0 5 2 0 8 50 7 125 2 15 204 423 9 9 2 02,5970 34 8 8 7:30 AM 1 6 11 0 24 80 6 218 2 15 304 657 10 4 3 13,0404 34 11 13 7:45 AM 0 19 10 0 22 110 14 203 6 33 298 686 8 10 3 43,1356 31 24 9 8:00 AM 0 27 33 0 29 324 18 209 2 57 281 831 14 54 2 23,14926 43 59 11 8:15 AM 0 50 19 0 28 243 21 255 10 31 267 866 8 9 3 43,0439 62 79 8 8:30 AM 0 16 27 0 22 46 29 281 7 16 256 752 9 10 0 42,7655 56 17 10 8:45 AM 1 1 34 0 26 75 26 256 2 18 242 700 9 5 5 22,6114 46 22 10 9:00 AM 0 8 24 0 23 33 22 213 13 10 285 725 9 6 3 42,4754 66 37 14 9:15 AM 0 11 23 0 42 95 23 194 2 12 197 588 11 3 3 05 46 12 7 9:30 AM 1 7 21 0 36 74 16 204 4 15 204 598 11 12 2 02 53 14 10 9:45 AM 0 8 11 0 32 143 25 176 4 11 186 564 6 3 1 12 59 26 7 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 7 0 0 2 0 90 0 0 0
Lights 93 109 177 105 62 3790 977 44 120 1,012 205 3,07017 21 1 0 Mediums 1 4 0 0 5 24 17 0 2 32 2 701 0 0 0
Total 94 1,001 44 122 1,046 207 94 113 177 105 67 39 3,14918 21 1 0

CASTRO ST CASTRO STFAIRMONT AVE FAIRMONT AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 2 CASTRO ST & FAIRMONT AVE AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
201 399
1 7
405201
0 0

0.94 N
S
E W

0.84 0.25

0.95 0.00
(965)(549)
(2)
(17)
()
()
(977)(546)
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1990
399
5 1

FAIRMONT AVE

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
0 55
0 37
N
S
E W
1639
00 0 0
16 21
0 0
9 0
18 1
0 0
2 10
0 0
0 0
0 13
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
16 2
12 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 41 0 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 65 2 4 0 03300 0 1 0
7:15 AM 0 0 41 0 0 200 0 0 0 0 0 62 6 6 0 04260 0 1 0
7:30 AM 0 0 50 0 1 480 0 0 0 0 0 99 13 3 0 05230 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 56 0 1 470 0 0 0 0 0 104 17 7 1 05720 0 0 0 8:00 AM 1 0 94 0 0 650 0 0 0 0 0 161 10 31 0 06070 0 1 0 8:15 AM 0 0 101 0 1 560 0 0 0 1 0 159 9 9 0 06040 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 108 0 1 370 0 0 0 0 0 148 9 9 0 05910 0 2 0 8:45 AM 0 0 96 0 0 410 0 0 0 0 0 139 9 6 0 05860 0 2 0
9:00 AM 0 0 108 0 0 480 0 0 0 0 0 158 9 7 0 05910 0 2 0 9:15 AM 0 0 91 1 1 530 0 0 0 0 0 146 7 1 0 00 0 0 0
9:30 AM 1 0 86 1 0 530 0 0 0 0 0 143 13 11 0 10 1 1 0
9:45 AM 1 0 90 0 0 510 0 0 0 0 0 144 8 6 0 00 0 2 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 0 389 5 2 192 00 0 0 1 0 0 5900 0 1 0
Mediums 0 10 0 0 7 00 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 399 5 2 199 0 6070 0 1 0

CASTRO ST CASTRO STHIGH SCHOOL WAY HIGH SCHOOL WAY
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 3 CASTRO ST & HIGH SCHOOL WAY AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
185 334
0 0
400204
68 115

0.92 N
S
E W

0.78 0.00

0.94 0.80
(769)(507)
()
()
(305)
(153)
(966)(552)
38 0
0 0
0 0
57 0
11 0
0 14777
323
0 0

HIGH SCHOOL WAY

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
30 59
0 56
N
S
E W
1841
00 5 25
31 25
5 3
10 0
13 0
0 0
0 9
3 0
2 0
3 2
N
S
EW
1 4
0 0
12 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 2 39 0 0 210 2 0 0 0 0 72 4 2 1 13522 0 0 6
7:15 AM 0 8 32 0 0 180 2 0 0 0 0 63 9 7 0 24570 0 0 3
7:30 AM 0 5 44 0 0 400 0 0 0 0 0 102 14 5 0 256510 0 0 3 7:45 AM 0 18 40 0 0 360 2 0 0 0 0 115 9 7 0 262013 0 0 6 8:00 AM 0 16 75 0 0 490 7 0 0 0 0 177 12 30 0 1965315 0 0 15 8:15 AM 0 22 79 0 0 440 2 0 0 0 0 171 12 11 0 163517 0 0 7 8:30 AM 0 21 89 0 0 260 1 0 0 0 0 157 12 10 0 862813 0 0 7 8:45 AM 0 18 80 0 0 280 1 0 0 0 0 148 20 8 0 262212 0 0 9 9:00 AM 0 33 73 0 0 340 2 0 0 0 0 159 12 9 0 562113 0 0 4 9:15 AM 0 31 63 0 0 470 5 0 0 0 0 164 14 0 0 48 0 0 10
9:30 AM 1 25 65 0 0 400 1 0 0 0 0 151 20 9 0 1113 0 0 6 9:45 AM 0 24 63 0 0 420 2 0 0 0 0 147 12 2 0 210 0 0 6
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 77 313 0 0 140 3811 0 57 0 0 0 6360 0 0 0
Mediums 0 10 0 0 7 00 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0
Total 11 0 57 0 0 0 77 323 0 0 147 38 6530 0 0 0

CASTRO ST CASTRO STYOSEMITE AVE YOSEMITE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 4 CASTRO ST & YOSEMITE AVE AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
173 321
34 37
335184
0 0

0.92 N
S
E W

0.86 0.73

0.93 0.00
(754)(484)
(75)
(72)
()
()
(771)(504)
0 1
13 9
0 25
0 0
0 0
0 1590
311
24 0

YOSEMITE AVE

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
30 60
19 85
N
S
E W
2535
163
18 12
51 34
1 0
11 0
14 0
0 3
1 7
0 5
0 0
0 3
N
S
EW
0 1
0 5
14 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 39 0 4 260 0 0 0 1 0 72 7 2 1 22990 0 2 0
7:15 AM 0 0 34 0 1 200 0 0 0 1 0 56 9 7 2 23740 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 43 0 1 400 0 0 0 1 0 87 14 6 2 54570 1 1 0
7:45 AM 0 0 41 1 1 310 0 0 0 8 0 84 7 6 2 64990 2 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 73 0 1 530 0 0 0 11 0 147 21 26 8 55420 1 8 0 8:15 AM 0 0 79 1 3 450 0 0 0 5 0 139 19 14 1 75160 2 4 0 8:30 AM 0 0 88 0 4 290 0 0 0 4 0 129 24 9 8 65070 2 2 0 8:45 AM 0 0 71 0 5 320 0 0 0 5 0 127 21 11 2 124980 4 10 0 9:00 AM 0 0 72 0 4 370 0 0 0 2 0 121 22 8 5 104890 3 3 0 9:15 AM 0 0 64 0 4 500 0 0 0 7 0 130 19 10 4 110 1 4 0
9:30 AM 0 0 62 1 3 410 0 0 0 6 0 120 31 7 6 90 2 5 0
9:45 AM 0 0 64 0 0 460 0 0 0 3 0 118 19 3 2 70 3 2 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 0 301 24 13 152 00 0 0 25 0 9 5250 0 0 1
Mediums 0 10 0 0 7 00 0 0 0 0 0 170 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 25 0 9 0 311 24 13 159 0 5420 0 0 1

HOPE ST HOPE STYOSEMITE AVE YOSEMITE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 5 HOPE ST & YOSEMITE AVE AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
15 37
14 14
3713
25 27

0.63 N
S
E W

0.71 0.50

0.71 0.63
(91)(43)
(24)
(21)
(70)
(52)
(89)(26)
5 0
0 1
13 0
3 14
8 0
0 109
28 0
0 YOSEMITE AVE

YOSEMITE AVE

HOPE ST

HOPE ST
9 4
9 6
N
S
E W
31 36
9 0
4 2
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 2
1 0
1 1
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 00 5 1 0 0 1 9 0 3 1 2410 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 6 0 0 00 1 0 0 0 0 7 1 1 0 2680 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 1 6 0 0 00 2 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 3710 0 0 1
7:45 AM 0 0 5 1 0 10 1 0 0 0 2 15 0 1 0 2790 0 0 5
8:00 AM 0 3 10 0 0 30 2 6 0 0 7 36 2 1 6 8911 0 0 4
8:15 AM 0 1 3 0 0 20 1 1 0 0 2 10 3 2 2 0730 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 3 9 0 0 00 1 3 0 0 1 18 0 1 1 0760 1 0 0
8:45 AM 0 2 6 0 0 50 4 4 0 0 3 27 1 0 0 1832 0 0 1
9:00 AM 0 4 3 0 0 50 1 1 0 0 2 18 2 1 0 5760 0 0 2
9:15 AM 0 1 2 0 0 01 3 1 0 0 2 13 2 1 4 00 0 0 3
9:30 AM 0 5 8 0 0 20 2 3 0 0 1 25 0 1 0 02 0 0 2
9:45 AM 0 4 4 0 0 10 2 0 0 1 1 20 3 0 1 21 0 1 5
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 9 25 0 0 10 58 14 3 0 13 1 880 0 0 0
Mediums 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0
Total 8 14 3 0 13 1 9 28 0 0 10 5 910 0 0 0

HOPE ST HOPE STFAIRMONT AVE FAIRMONT AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 6 HOPE ST & FAIRMONT AVE AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
12 35
3 8
3812
5 3

0.81 N
S
E W

0.57 0.75

0.79 0.58
(88)(26)
(4)
(16)
(4)
(13)
(90)(25)
2 0
1 0
1 2
1 4
0 0
0 90
35 3
0 FAIRMONT AVE

FAIRMONT AVE

HOPE ST

HOPE ST
4 4
2 3
N
S
E W
40 02
4 0
1 2
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 1
2 0
0 0
N
S
EW
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1250 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 6 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 1400 0 1 0
7:30 AM 0 0 6 0 0 00 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 1420 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 7 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 9 0 1 2 0490 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 11 0 0 30 0 0 0 1 0 17 0 0 0 3580 0 1 1
8:15 AM 0 0 4 0 1 00 0 2 0 0 0 9 2 4 1 1540 0 2 0
8:30 AM 0 0 12 0 0 00 0 1 0 0 1 14 0 0 1 0540 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 8 0 0 60 0 1 0 1 0 18 1 0 0 0561 0 0 1
9:00 AM 0 0 7 0 1 40 0 1 0 0 0 13 0 2 1 1500 0 0 0
9:15 AM 1 0 5 0 0 00 0 3 0 0 0 9 7 2 3 10 0 0 0
9:30 AM 0 1 10 0 0 40 1 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 00 0 0 0
9:45 AM 0 0 8 0 1 20 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 00 1 0 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 0 32 3 1 9 20 4 1 1 1 0 540 0 0 0
Mediums 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 0 1 0 0 40 0 0 0
Total 0 4 1 2 1 0 0 35 3 1 9 2 580 0 0 0

HOPE ST HOPE STEL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 7 HOPE ST & EL CAMINO REAL AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
3 36
1,577
1,259
420
1,275
1,544

0.94 N
S
E W

0.65 0.94

0.67 0.87
(87)(20)
(4,071)
(3,093)
(4,004)
(3,122)
(17)(46)
3 0
0 36
1,541
0 20
1,255
0 0
0 00
0 4
0 EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

HOPE ST

HOPE ST
6 0
33 0
N
S
E W
00 1023
5 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 121 0 0 263 387 1 1 6 32,1081 0 0 2 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 147 0 0 268 423 0 0 5 12,4330 7 1 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 232 0 0 359 601 0 0 13 12,7672 6 2 0 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 275 0 0 411 697 0 0 8 12,8592 7 2 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 291 0 0 405 712 0 0 8 02,8042 10 1 3 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 368 0 0 376 757 0 0 3 32,7617 6 0 0 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 321 0 0 349 693 0 0 14 22,5269 13 1 0 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 305 0 0 321 642 0 0 5 42,4152 8 2 4 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 277 0 0 374 669 0 0 7 42,3188 6 1 3 9:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 244 0 0 266 522 0 0 8 04 5 2 1
9:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 251 0 0 307 582 0 0 8 07 10 2 5
9:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 244 0 0 285 545 0 0 5 02 9 3 2
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 6 0 0 2 0 80 0 0 0
Lights 0 0 4 0 0 30 1,227 20 0 1,508 34 2,7960 0 0 0
Mediums 0 0 0 0 0 00 22 0 0 31 2 550 0 0 0
Total 0 1,255 20 0 1,541 36 0 0 4 0 0 3 2,8590 0 0 0

CASTRO ST CASTRO STCHURCH ST CHURCH ST
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 8 CASTRO ST & CHURCH ST AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
104 268
131
131
320172
147
131

0.93 N
S
E W

0.90 0.87

0.88 0.78
(609)(300)
(290)
(280)
(301)
(351)
(738)(489)
8 0
4 21
78 32
48 78
21 0
0 9245
226
49 0

CHURCH ST

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
1 35
24 59
N
S
E W
1619
1014
0 1
35 24
0 0
8 0
5 0
3 5
5 3
0 1
2 11
1 1
N
S
EW
0 0
0 1
4 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 7 19 0 0 170 0 7 0 4 7 70 5 3 0 03544 1 4 0
7:15 AM 0 7 15 0 1 100 1 4 0 1 7 62 7 6 5 24726 0 8 2
7:30 AM 0 9 22 0 0 140 0 7 0 8 9 97 7 3 6 158718 3 7 0
7:45 AM 0 4 25 0 1 200 3 15 0 10 20 125 11 6 6 066614 3 9 1 8:00 AM 0 10 58 0 0 250 3 31 0 14 22 188 10 16 11 170213 3 9 0 8:15 AM 0 13 53 0 1 320 5 17 0 6 18 177 23 4 2 067815 5 11 1 8:30 AM 0 15 65 0 1 180 4 15 0 4 27 176 10 8 6 064210 4 11 2 8:45 AM 0 7 50 0 2 170 9 15 0 8 11 161 16 7 5 063710 9 18 5 9:00 AM 0 8 54 0 1 250 4 9 0 6 13 164 15 5 12 262314 8 12 10 9:15 AM 0 8 41 0 1 280 3 13 0 6 8 141 30 13 12 417 1 11 4 9:30 AM 0 11 64 0 0 310 12 11 0 8 8 171 18 16 12 112 5 9 0 9:45 AM 0 12 42 0 1 220 11 8 0 11 8 147 26 8 10 011 4 10 7 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 45 216 49 4 85 820 77 48 32 74 21 6790 0 0 0
Mediums 0 10 0 0 7 01 1 0 0 4 0 230 0 0 0
Total 21 78 48 32 78 21 45 226 49 4 92 8 7020 0 0 0

SHORELINE BLVD SHORELINE BLVDCHURCH ST CHURCH ST
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 9 SHORELINE BLVD & CHURCH ST AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
721 786
132
143
730742
143
55 0.91
N
S
E W

0.82 0.89

0.91 0.55
(1,749)(1,524)
(303)
(352)
(108)
(272)
(1,615)(1,505)
12 2
79 78
25 29
81 36
26 0
0 62818
680
28 4

CHURCH ST

SHORELINE BLVD

SHORELINE BLVD
5 11
20 4
N
S
E W
38 164
3 2
4 0
1 0
1 2
1 1
5 2
1 7
1 12
0 12
1 2
N
S
EW
1 0
1 11
0 1
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 46 1 4 420 0 6 0 1 6 123 1 0 1 08947 7 0 3
7:15 AM 1 0 48 0 11 560 1 1 0 7 1 143 1 2 0 11,2474 11 1 1 7:30 AM 3 1 65 0 8 1020 2 7 0 6 7 230 4 2 0 01,55014 10 3 2 7:45 AM 3 3 129 1 10 1740 7 10 0 3 7 398 3 7 9 11,72612 27 7 5 8:00 AM 1 6 143 0 23 1960 12 14 0 10 6 476 1 1 7 11,68841 18 6 0 8:15 AM 0 4 205 0 23 1510 5 8 0 9 5 446 0 1 2 01,54615 11 6 4 8:30 AM 0 5 203 1 23 1070 2 4 0 7 7 406 0 2 2 31,38013 22 9 3 8:45 AM 0 1 171 0 30 1040 3 10 0 9 3 360 0 2 1 01,2518 14 5 2 9:00 AM 0 0 177 1 13 970 3 4 0 3 4 334 1 2 1 21,1328 16 4 4 9:15 AM 2 1 118 0 18 830 7 9 0 7 3 280 0 3 2 38 14 8 2
9:30 AM 0 0 121 1 23 950 4 4 0 6 6 277 0 1 2 16 4 7 0
9:45 AM 2 0 95 1 26 700 7 2 0 8 3 241 0 1 5 04 15 5 3
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0
Lights 18 671 28 77 623 1226 36 80 29 25 74 1,7050 0 4 2 Mediums 0 9 0 2 4 00 0 1 0 0 4 200 0 0 0
Total 26 36 81 29 25 78 18 680 28 79 628 12 1,7260 0 4 2

SHORELINE BLVD SHORELINE BLVDEL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 10 SHORELINE BLVD & EL CAMINO REAL AM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
721 695
1,340
1,011
492561
1,198
1,484

0.96 N
S
E W

0.75 0.96

0.96 0.91
(1,569)(1,431)
(3,403)
(2,575)
(3,705)
(3,069)
(992)(1,046)
218
2 170
116
1,110
102
127
779
280
12 12
331144
297
50 1

EL CAMINO REAL

SHORELINE BLVD

SHORELINE BLVD
4 11
8 4
N
S
E W
92 62
3 1
2 2
3 0
7 0
3 0
3 0
0 0
0 2
0 1
0 1
N
S
EW
1 2
1 1
1 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 6 1 19 160 17 100 1 7 209 413 1 1 2 02,4686 12 0 14 7:15 AM 0 16 15 0 26 230 24 99 1 10 222 484 0 0 0 03,03013 9 2 24 7:30 AM 0 8 25 0 30 344 35 178 6 14 288 686 3 1 1 03,51825 14 1 24 7:45 AM 0 33 52 1 41 791 55 172 3 33 294 885 1 0 2 13,75137 22 11 51 8:00 AM 1 41 68 0 61 1182 51 169 3 31 285 975 2 6 1 03,73233 32 20 60 8:15 AM 0 43 79 0 36 895 89 187 5 21 264 972 0 5 1 23,57032 40 11 71 8:30 AM 0 27 98 1 32 454 85 251 1 17 267 919 1 0 4 13,26425 22 8 36 8:45 AM 0 27 81 0 30 429 93 232 5 15 233 866 0 6 1 13,00634 20 6 39 9:00 AM 1 31 79 1 35 418 67 194 0 14 253 813 0 0 1 22,69521 29 2 37 9:15 AM 0 22 34 0 25 395 64 177 5 9 213 666 1 4 0 314 26 4 29 9:30 AM 0 16 49 1 31 363 58 172 3 17 212 661 7 3 5 19 14 6 34 9:45 AM 0 22 40 1 18 224 43 151 3 11 172 555 0 2 0 012 16 2 38 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 00 5 0 0 2 0 80 0 0 0
Lights 144 296 50 169 326 216277 751 127 101 1,086 111 3,68112 12 1 2 Mediums 0 1 0 1 4 23 23 0 1 22 5 620 0 0 0
Total 280 779 127 102 1,110 116 144 297 50 170 331 218 3,75112 12 1 2

CASTRO ST CASTRO STEL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 1 CASTRO ST & EL CAMINO REAL PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:30 PM - 06:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:45 PM - 06:00 PM
343 335
1,648
1,502
273310
1,301
1,418

0.91 N
S
E W

0.82 0.86

0.86 0.90
(930)(983)
(4,417)
(4,316)
(3,890)
(3,783)
(716)(763)
55 0
189
137
1,307
164
42 1,158
89 40
12 9944
109
115
5 EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
6 38
16 19
N
S
E W
2018
106
5 1
7 12
0 0
6 0
3 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 5
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 3
3 2
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 1 14 28 0 58 142 17 341 8 24 258 850 9 9 8 63,32510 31 23 21 4:15 PM 4 14 26 0 42 144 27 296 5 29 239 777 20 17 5 53,3108 29 23 17 4:30 PM 3 9 23 0 35 191 16 259 10 28 331 819 16 2 6 23,3246 41 26 12 4:45 PM 1 7 20 0 47 127 12 330 7 31 331 879 6 3 2 13,3583 35 14 22 5:00 PM 2 12 20 0 58 247 20 269 11 33 291 835 5 10 3 33,45417 31 25 15 5:15 PM 4 13 35 0 45 222 23 236 8 39 276 791 7 15 3 23,53610 33 21 24 5:30 PM 1 12 32 0 46 303 14 265 10 42 311 853 6 12 2 13,5659 25 40 13 5:45 PM 0 13 23 0 33 233 20 330 12 45 374 975 1 3 8 13,39610 47 25 17 6:00 PM 3 8 30 0 72 252 22 311 9 41 308 917 11 12 3 13,1209 31 32 14 6:15 PM 1 11 24 0 38 214 33 252 9 36 314 820 1 11 3 314 34 18 11 6:30 PM 0 3 12 0 32 198 13 257 5 23 246 684 19 6 6 36 32 15 13 6:45 PM 1 10 21 0 42 146 17 245 8 25 238 699 11 7 3 87 33 13 19 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 0
Lights 44 105 114 189 95 5387 1,144 42 164 1,298 137 3,52912 40 5 0 Mediums 0 4 1 0 4 22 14 0 0 8 0 350 0 0 0
Total 89 1,158 42 164 1,307 137 44 109 115 189 99 55 3,56512 40 5 0

CASTRO ST CASTRO STFAIRMONT AVE FAIRMONT AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 2 CASTRO ST & FAIRMONT AVE PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:15 PM - 06:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM
353 315
1 25
338352
0 0

0.91 N
S
E W

0.91 0.50

0.92 0.00
(890)(984)
(3)
(55)
()
()
(933)(975)
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 3510
312
25 1

FAIRMONT AVE

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
1 39
0 4
N
S
E W
2019
00 0 1
3 1
0 0
10 0
1 0
0 0
4 6
0 0
0 0
0 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
1 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 74 0 1 990 0 0 0 0 0 178 2 6 0 06280 1 3 0
4:15 PM 0 0 80 1 1 690 0 0 0 0 0 155 0 15 0 06170 0 4 0 4:30 PM 0 0 77 0 0 670 0 0 0 0 0 146 2 1 0 06410 0 2 0
4:45 PM 1 0 65 0 1 810 0 0 0 0 0 149 0 5 2 06570 0 1 0
5:00 PM 0 0 67 1 1 960 0 0 0 0 0 167 0 8 0 16690 0 2 0
5:15 PM 0 0 87 0 0 870 0 0 0 0 0 179 0 15 0 06920 0 5 0 5:30 PM 1 0 65 1 0 900 0 0 0 0 0 162 0 7 0 06820 0 5 0
5:45 PM 0 0 81 0 0 720 0 0 0 0 0 161 2 7 0 06440 1 7 0
6:00 PM 0 0 79 1 0 1020 0 0 0 0 0 190 2 10 0 16230 0 8 0 6:15 PM 0 0 85 0 2 770 0 0 0 0 0 169 4 7 0 00 0 5 0
6:30 PM 0 0 53 0 2 650 0 0 0 1 0 124 14 14 0 00 0 3 0
6:45 PM 0 0 71 0 0 670 0 0 0 0 0 140 17 13 0 00 0 2 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 0 307 25 0 344 00 0 0 0 0 1 6800 0 1 2
Mediums 0 5 0 0 7 00 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 312 25 0 351 0 6920 0 1 2

CASTRO ST CASTRO STHIGH SCHOOL WAY HIGH SCHOOL WAY
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 3 CASTRO ST & HIGH SCHOOL WAY PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:15 PM - 06:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM
289 275
0 0
320357
114
91 0.92
N
S
E W

0.93 0.00

0.90 0.84
(773)(802)
()
()
(230)
(296)
(895)(990)
26 0
0 0
0 0
94 0
20 0
0 26365
255
0 0

HIGH SCHOOL WAY

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
30 61
0 61
N
S
E W
3724
00 15 15
21 40
3 1
10 0
0 0
0 0
0 7
1 0
2 0
0 6
N
S
EW
1 2
0 0
0 0
2 4
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 1 14 60 0 0 760 1 0 0 0 0 176 17 15 0 565423 0 0 1 4:15 PM 0 8 74 0 0 570 0 0 0 0 0 159 16 30 0 1265314 0 0 6 4:30 PM 0 13 64 0 0 540 6 0 0 0 0 155 23 13 0 368513 0 0 5 4:45 PM 0 13 52 0 0 650 10 0 0 0 0 164 10 14 0 569620 0 0 4 5:00 PM 1 12 56 0 0 750 3 0 0 0 0 175 9 11 0 270224 0 0 4 5:15 PM 0 14 75 0 0 620 7 0 0 0 0 191 15 12 0 972327 0 0 6 5:30 PM 0 9 58 0 0 730 3 0 0 0 0 166 13 10 0 870219 0 0 4 5:45 PM 0 24 58 0 0 530 6 0 0 0 0 170 14 21 0 866220 0 0 9 6:00 PM 0 18 64 0 0 750 4 0 0 0 0 196 19 18 0 563728 0 0 7 6:15 PM 1 16 68 0 0 600 6 0 0 0 0 170 12 10 0 417 0 0 2 6:30 PM 0 14 38 0 0 480 3 0 0 0 0 126 23 12 0 517 0 0 6 6:45 PM 0 15 55 0 0 440 2 0 0 0 0 145 34 14 0 323 0 0 6 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 65 250 0 0 257 2620 0 94 0 0 0 7120 0 0 0
Mediums 0 5 0 0 6 00 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
Total 20 0 94 0 0 0 65 255 0 0 263 26 7230 0 0 0

CASTRO ST CASTRO STYOSEMITE AVE YOSEMITE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 4 CASTRO ST & YOSEMITE AVE PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:15 PM - 06:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
262 268
49 28
277292
0 0

0.93 N
S
E W

0.89 0.77

0.83 0.00
(754)(741)
(106)
(67)
()
()
(775)(801)
0 0
8 11
0 38
0 0
0 0
0 2540
257
20 0

YOSEMITE AVE

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
15 37
30 70
N
S
E W
1720
1515
7 8
24 46
1 0
6 1
4 0
0 5
2 3
0 3
0 0
0 1
N
S
EW
0 1
1 2
4 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 57 0 0 660 0 0 0 10 0 138 23 7 5 45500 1 4 0 4:15 PM 0 0 70 0 1 550 0 0 0 5 0 136 24 11 12 25530 1 4 0 4:30 PM 0 0 67 0 6 570 0 0 0 3 0 141 29 9 3 15750 5 3 0 4:45 PM 0 0 60 0 3 600 0 0 0 8 0 135 12 4 5 15780 1 3 0 5:00 PM 0 0 55 0 3 750 0 0 0 4 0 141 11 10 2 25720 1 3 0 5:15 PM 0 0 78 0 5 610 0 0 0 8 0 158 16 6 9 25880 1 5 0 5:30 PM 0 0 58 0 2 700 0 0 0 7 0 144 13 11 8 85660 5 2 0 5:45 PM 0 0 57 0 0 490 0 0 0 14 0 129 16 15 8 05200 2 7 0 6:00 PM 0 0 64 0 1 740 0 0 0 9 0 157 25 5 5 55000 3 6 0 6:15 PM 0 0 70 0 1 570 0 0 0 5 0 136 14 8 4 00 0 3 0
6:30 PM 0 0 41 0 1 460 0 0 0 8 0 98 26 10 5 30 2 0 0
6:45 PM 0 0 55 0 1 470 0 0 0 3 0 109 34 15 3 40 0 3 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 0 252 20 8 248 00 0 0 38 0 11 5770 0 0 0
Mediums 0 5 0 0 6 00 0 0 0 0 0 110 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 38 0 11 0 257 20 8 254 0 5880 0 0 0

HOPE ST HOPE STYOSEMITE AVE YOSEMITE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 5 HOPE ST & YOSEMITE AVE PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:15 PM - 06:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM
24 42
23 23
4812
28 46

0.88 N
S
E W

0.67 0.82

0.87 0.70
(132)(54)
(37)
(45)
(102)
(62)
(156)(30)
12 0
1 1
20 1
0 20
8 1
0 1114
33 1
0 YOSEMITE AVE

YOSEMITE AVE

HOPE ST

HOPE ST
5 6
3 6
N
S
E W
24 21
3 2
3 3
0 2
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 1
0 2
2 2
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 6 10 0 0 30 1 3 0 0 2 28 1 0 3 11020 0 0 3
4:15 PM 0 6 5 0 0 30 2 1 0 0 1 21 0 2 2 0980 0 0 3
4:30 PM 0 6 11 0 0 00 5 3 0 0 1 28 0 1 2 21100 0 0 2
4:45 PM 0 2 13 0 0 10 3 1 0 0 1 25 2 4 0 01091 0 0 3
5:00 PM 0 2 10 0 0 40 1 2 0 0 3 24 4 2 0 31121 0 1 0
5:15 PM 0 1 10 0 0 10 4 6 1 1 4 33 1 1 0 21230 0 0 5
5:30 PM 0 4 5 0 0 40 1 4 0 0 6 27 2 1 2 11060 1 0 2
5:45 PM 0 4 8 0 0 20 1 6 0 0 5 28 3 3 1 11010 0 1 1
6:00 PM 0 5 10 0 1 40 2 4 0 0 5 35 0 1 0 1950 0 0 4
6:15 PM 0 2 6 0 0 20 0 4 0 0 0 16 1 3 0 00 0 1 1
6:30 PM 0 3 11 0 0 20 1 1 0 0 3 22 1 5 1 10 0 0 1
6:45 PM 0 3 10 0 2 00 0 3 0 0 2 22 0 0 0 21 1 0 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 14 33 1 1 11 128 20 0 1 20 1 1230 1 0 0
Mediums 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Total 8 20 0 1 20 1 14 33 1 1 11 12 1230 1 0 0

HOPE ST HOPE STFAIRMONT AVE FAIRMONT AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 6 HOPE ST & FAIRMONT AVE PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:45 PM - 06:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM
11 52
7 27
4717
38 7

0.86 N
S
E W

0.75 0.58

0.91 0.77
(154)(30)
(9)
(49)
(8)
(80)
(135)(43)
1 0
3 4
1 2
8 20
9 0
1 74
39 4
0 FAIRMONT AVE

FAIRMONT AVE

HOPE ST

HOPE ST
7 9
3 4
N
S
E W
27 21
2 5
3 1
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 12 0 0 30 3 1 0 0 0 20 0 0 2 1791 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 7 0 1 30 3 1 0 0 0 16 0 2 2 0771 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 13 0 0 00 4 1 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0802 0 1 0
4:45 PM 0 1 13 0 0 20 2 2 0 0 0 22 1 2 1 1781 1 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 11 0 1 20 0 3 0 0 0 18 0 2 3 0841 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 12 0 0 20 0 3 0 1 0 19 1 1 1 0961 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 5 0 1 30 3 5 0 0 0 19 0 0 1 0982 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 2 7 0 0 20 4 6 0 1 1 28 1 2 1 01034 1 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 10 0 1 20 4 8 0 0 0 30 0 2 0 2911 1 2 1
6:15 PM 0 0 11 0 2 00 0 4 0 1 0 21 1 2 1 12 0 1 0
6:30 PM 0 2 11 0 0 31 1 2 0 0 0 24 2 3 1 41 2 1 0
6:45 PM 0 0 13 0 1 00 0 1 0 0 0 16 0 2 1 01 0 0 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 4 39 4 3 7 19 20 8 2 1 3 1021 0 0 0
Mediums 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0
Total 9 20 8 2 1 4 4 39 4 3 7 1 1031 0 0 0

HOPE ST HOPE STEL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 7 HOPE ST & EL CAMINO REAL PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:30 PM - 06:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:45 PM - 06:00 PM
17 36
1,697
1,515
1910
1,506
1,678

0.91 N
S
E W

0.68 0.90

0.58 0.87
(131)(43)
(4,553)
(4,268)
(4,465)
(4,260)
(51)(43)
17 0
0 36
1,661
0 10
1,496
0 0
0 00
0 19
0 EL CAMINO REAL

EL CAMINO REAL

HOPE ST

HOPE ST
3 0
56 0
N
S
E W
00 3026
3 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 398 0 0 316 745 0 0 26 13,01412 12 1 6 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 373 0 0 324 720 0 0 17 23,0105 9 5 4 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 316 0 0 380 725 0 0 12 12,9566 15 5 3 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 382 0 0 410 824 0 0 4 13,0116 14 9 3 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 356 0 0 371 741 0 0 10 23,0742 8 2 2 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 294 0 0 354 666 0 0 15 23,1921 11 3 3 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 357 0 0 409 780 0 0 9 23,2391 5 5 3 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 397 0 0 465 887 0 0 20 03,0614 8 6 7 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 428 0 0 409 859 0 0 16 02,8193 12 2 5 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 314 0 0 378 713 0 0 11 12 11 6 2 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 296 0 0 287 602 0 0 14 40 13 1 5 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 306 0 0 319 645 0 0 7 11 13 6 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 1 0 0 1 0 20 0 0 0
Lights 0 0 19 0 0 170 1,480 10 0 1,652 36 3,2140 0 0 0
Mediums 0 0 0 0 0 00 15 0 0 8 0 230 0 0 0
Total 0 1,496 10 0 1,661 36 0 0 19 0 0 17 3,2390 0 0 0

CASTRO ST CASTRO STCHURCH ST CHURCH ST
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 8 CASTRO ST & CHURCH ST PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:30 PM - 05:30 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
188 205
140
143
266258
157
145

0.95 N
S
E W

0.85 0.83

0.89 0.78
(557)(493)
(384)
(447)
(386)
(506)
(723)(716)
21 0
6 18
77 45
51 89
17 0
0 16147
170
48 1

CHURCH ST

CASTRO ST

CASTRO ST
23 43
36 58
N
S
E W
2617
1818
13 10
28 30
0 0
4 0
0 0
7 0
6 3
0 0
2 8
5 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 10 43 0 1 440 9 25 0 11 18 184 26 3 12 471513 4 3 3 4:15 PM 0 11 41 0 1 350 7 22 0 12 8 169 21 3 0 272310 4 14 4 4:30 PM 0 14 54 0 1 390 4 17 0 9 16 186 22 10 8 275113 3 7 9 4:45 PM 0 8 36 0 1 360 3 25 0 6 19 176 36 8 14 974721 5 12 4 5:00 PM 0 11 38 0 3 460 7 29 0 18 16 192 0 13 7 57304 3 11 6 5:15 PM 1 14 42 0 1 400 3 18 0 12 26 197 0 12 7 774913 7 18 2 5:30 PM 0 8 39 0 0 450 4 28 0 9 20 182 0 19 18 573612 6 7 4 5:45 PM 0 15 36 0 0 300 0 20 0 8 23 159 0 16 11 568413 1 11 2 6:00 PM 0 13 31 0 1 400 5 38 0 15 28 211 28 16 6 466117 5 18 0 6:15 PM 0 5 48 0 5 370 3 25 0 5 21 184 35 10 4 516 4 15 0 6:30 PM 0 7 23 0 0 250 2 31 0 6 14 130 36 15 12 910 2 8 2 6:45 PM 2 9 29 0 1 230 4 19 0 4 14 136 35 21 6 1116 2 11 2 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 47 166 48 6 154 2117 88 50 45 77 18 7380 0 1 0
Mediums 0 4 0 0 7 00 1 1 0 0 0 130 0 0 0
Total 17 89 51 45 77 18 47 170 48 6 161 21 7510 0 1 0

SHORELINE BLVD SHORELINE BLVDCHURCH ST CHURCH ST
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 9 SHORELINE BLVD & CHURCH ST PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:15 PM - 06:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM
870 648
158
227
619821
108
59 0.98
N
S
E W

0.95 0.90

0.95 0.87
(1,865)(2,251)
(432)
(628)
(187)
(293)
(1,827)(2,123)
15 3
123
67 34
57 29
56 23
0 0
72910
555
48 6

CHURCH ST

SHORELINE BLVD

SHORELINE BLVD
9 3
19 3
N
S
E W
21 910
4 5
1 2
4 0
2 0
0 1
5 2
1 1
0 2
0 7
1 1
N
S
EW
4 0
0 2
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 1 3 146 1 17 1370 4 8 0 15 7 388 0 0 9 21,58112 20 13 4 4:15 PM 0 5 116 0 20 1670 3 12 0 16 2 372 1 2 7 21,6024 9 16 2 4:30 PM 0 4 150 0 31 1250 3 7 0 9 6 376 0 1 3 11,6727 12 18 4 4:45 PM 0 1 170 1 27 1680 1 11 0 12 20 445 0 1 2 11,73011 9 9 5 5:00 PM 0 3 149 2 27 1440 5 16 0 8 14 409 0 3 7 41,7176 21 8 6 5:15 PM 2 0 159 0 25 1770 5 6 0 18 7 442 1 1 2 21,75510 19 10 4 5:30 PM 2 2 130 0 31 1960 4 19 0 12 7 434 1 1 3 11,7167 10 13 1 5:45 PM 2 6 134 1 26 1760 8 15 0 10 8 432 0 0 8 01,6357 23 13 3 6:00 PM 0 2 132 2 41 1800 6 16 0 17 12 447 1 1 6 61,5055 15 12 7 6:15 PM 3 3 144 0 27 1360 3 21 0 17 12 403 0 0 11 211 3 15 8 6:30 PM 4 0 104 3 34 1390 2 11 0 12 5 353 1 0 8 58 19 9 3 6:45 PM 3 0 104 2 28 1080 2 9 0 11 6 302 0 2 11 38 9 7 5 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0
Lights 10 551 48 123 728 1523 56 29 57 34 67 1,7500 0 6 3 Mediums 0 4 0 0 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0
Total 23 56 29 57 34 67 10 555 48 123 729 15 1,7550 0 6 3

SHORELINE BLVD SHORELINE BLVDEL CAMINO REAL EL CAMINO REAL (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
Location: 10 SHORELINE BLVD & EL CAMINO REAL PM
Thursday, September 12, 2024Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:15 PM - 06:15 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 06:00 PM - 06:15 PM
826 570
1,401
1,293
344595
1,529
1,642

0.96 N
S
E W

0.94 0.94

0.87 0.86
(1,643)(2,140)
(3,940)
(3,747)
(4,618)
(4,354)
(998)(1,424)
302
9 164
112
1,175
97 147
1,088
261
17 33
351132
188
24 0

EL CAMINO REAL

SHORELINE BLVD

SHORELINE BLVD
8 2
5 8
N
S
E W
11 14
6 2
1 7
0 0
4 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 3
N
S
EW
0 0
0 1
0 1
0 3
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 36 37 2 41 548 73 341 0 19 282 1,023 3 0 3 43,90826 31 4 69 4:15 PM 1 30 45 3 37 686 44 274 8 15 221 899 4 0 2 03,83131 27 9 80 4:30 PM 0 29 74 0 32 6512 54 231 2 19 291 924 6 0 0 43,90516 34 10 55 4:45 PM 1 30 48 0 32 8411 63 320 3 16 299 1,062 7 0 4 04,02139 38 5 73 5:00 PM 0 36 60 1 33 607 57 237 3 21 289 946 2 0 0 03,97622 33 9 78 5:15 PM 0 31 55 3 36 946 60 242 3 15 268 973 3 0 1 14,10046 25 3 86 5:30 PM 0 29 47 3 34 10213 58 307 5 26 278 1,040 0 0 1 14,07528 32 4 74 5:45 PM 0 35 49 1 53 908 71 221 3 23 325 1,017 3 2 3 23,77336 25 10 67 6:00 PM 0 37 37 2 41 656 72 318 6 33 304 1,070 2 0 0 43,54837 30 7 75 6:15 PM 0 26 54 2 41 6910 67 246 5 12 288 948 1 0 0 225 23 7 73 6:30 PM 0 19 15 1 29 5611 58 196 7 15 218 738 6 1 0 821 23 5 64 6:45 PM 0 23 35 0 29 3414 31 247 5 13 239 792 5 1 1 227 40 6 49 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 00 2 0 0 1 0 30 0 0 0
Lights 132 188 24 162 351 302258 1,070 147 97 1,165 112 4,06733 17 0 9 Mediums 0 0 0 2 0 03 16 0 0 9 0 300 0 0 0
Total 261 1,088 147 97 1,175 112 132 188 24 164 351 302 4,10033 17 0 9

AUTO CENSUS
Date: Traffic Monitoring and Analysis
Counters: 5973 Larkstone Loop
Location:

Weather: Fair
Start Time IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 7:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
7:45 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 1
8:00 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3
8:15 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 3
8:30 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 3
8:45 2 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 4 4
9:00 3 2 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 4 4
Hourly
Peak Hour Totals
7:00 - 8:00 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 12
7:15 - 8:15 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 3 15
7:30 - 8:30 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 13
7:45 - 8:45 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 1 3 16
8:00 - 9:00 1 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 1 1 18
Peak Volumes: 1 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 0 1 1 18
In 14
Out 4
Start Time IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT IN OUT 4:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1
4:45 1 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2
5:00 1 7 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 2 5
5:15 1 7 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 1 2 5
5:30 2 7 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1 1 2 5
5:45 2 7 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 8 1 2 3 6
6:00 2 7 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 9 1 4 3 8
Hourly
Peak Hour Totals
4:00-5:00 1 7 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 2 5 26
4:15-5:15 1 5 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 1 1 2 5 27
4:30-5:30 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 1 2 4 22
4:45-5:45 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 1 2 3 4 28
5:00-6:00 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 6 1 3 1 3 22
Peak Volumes: 1 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 1 2 3 4 28
In 11
Out 17
Street 2 Street 3DWY 1 DWY 2 DWY 3 DWY 6 Street 1DWY 4 DWY 5 Peak Hour Volume Count- 24KK17(Mt.View)
Jo, Jana, Betty, Steve, Dave
Street 1 Street 2 Street 3DWY 1 DWY 2 DWY 3 DWY 4
9/24/2024
881 Castro
445 Lily Ann Way
DWY 5 DWY 6
San Jose, CA 95123

Appendix B

Level of Service Calculations

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose 881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #2: Castro St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 199 2
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.002

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 400 5
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 8:00-9:00
Base Vol: 0 400 5 2 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 400 5 2 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 400 5 2 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 400 5 2 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 400 5 2 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 405 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1165 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1165 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 400 5 2 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIGNAL WARRANT DISCLAIMER
This peak hour signal warrant analysis should be considered solely as an "indicator" of the likelihood of an unsignalized intersection warranting a traffic signal in the future. Intersections that exceed this warrant are probably more likely to meet one or more of the other volume based signal warrant (such as the 4-hour or 8-hour warrants).

The peak hour warrant analysis in this report is not intended to replace a rigorous and complete traffic signal warrant analysis by the responsible jurisdiction. Consideration of the other signal warrants, which is beyond the scope of this software, may yield different results.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 400 5 2 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 606
Minor Approach Volume: 0
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 457
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #2: Castro St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 214 2
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.002

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 438 5
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 443 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1128 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1128 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 659
Minor Approach Volume: 0
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 429
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #2: Castro St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 214 0
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.000

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0
Final Vol: 0 437 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 438 5 2 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 -4 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 437 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 437 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 437 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 437 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 437 0 0 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 651
Minor Approach Volume: 0
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 334
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-7
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #3: Castro St/High School Way

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 38 147 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

11 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.065

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 2.0

0 57 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 2.0

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0
Final Vol: 77 323 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 8:00- 9:00 Base Vol: 77 323 0 0 147 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 323 0 0 147 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 323 0 0 147 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 323 0 0 147 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 77 323 0 0 147 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 185 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 643 643 166 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1402 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 441 394 884 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1402 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 423 373 884 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 751 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 77 323 0 0 147 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.3 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=68]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=653] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 77 323 0 0 147 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 585
Minor Approach Volume: 68
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 470
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #3: Castro St/High School Way

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 38 162 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

11 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.066

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.9

0 57 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.9

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0
Final Vol: 77 361 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 200 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 696 696 181 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1384 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 411 368 867 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1384 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 393 347 867 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 726 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.5 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=68]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=706] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 638
Minor Approach Volume: 68
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 440
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-11
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #3: Castro St/High School Way

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 38 160 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

11 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.066

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.8

0 57 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.8

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0
Final Vol: 77 369 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 77 361 0 0 162 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 369 0 0 160 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 77 369 0 0 160 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 77 369 0 0 160 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 198 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 702 702 179 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1387 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 407 365 869 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1387 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 389 344 869 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.06 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.00 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 725 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 77 369 0 0 160 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 10.5 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=68]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=712] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 77 369 0 0 160 38 11 0 57 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 644
Minor Approach Volume: 68
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 337
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-13
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #4: Castro St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 159 14
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 9

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.048

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.9

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.9

0 25
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 311 24
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 8:00-9:00
Base Vol: 0 311 24 14 159 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 311 24 14 159 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 311 24 14 159 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 311 24 14 159 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 311 24 14 159 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 335 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 510 510 323 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1236 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 527 469 723 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1236 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 522 464 723 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.01 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 564 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.8 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.8 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-14
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 311 24 14 159 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=34]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=542] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 311 24 14 159 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 508
Minor Approach Volume: 34
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 518
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #4: Castro St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 174 14
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 9

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.051

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.9

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.9

0 25
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 349 24
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 373 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 563 563 361 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1197 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 491 438 688 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1197 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 487 433 688 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.01 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 527 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.3 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=34]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=595] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 561
Minor Approach Volume: 34
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 484
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-17
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #4: Castro St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 172 18
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 16

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.052

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.1

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.1

0 25
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 349 32
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 349 24 14 174 0 0 0 0 25 0 9 Added Vol: 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 2 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 349 32 18 172 0 0 0 0 25 0 16 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 349 32 18 172 0 0 0 0 25 0 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 349 32 18 172 0 0 0 0 25 0 16 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 381 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 573 573 365 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1189 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 484 432 685 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1189 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 479 426 685 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.02 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 542 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-18
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 349 32 18 172 0 0 0 0 25 0 16 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=41]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=612] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 349 32 18 172 0 0 0 0 25 0 16 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 571
Minor Approach Volume: 41
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 478
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-19
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #5: Hope St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 5 10 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

8 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 1

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 14 1!

Critical V/C: 0.033

1! 13
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 5.9

0 3 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 5.9

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 9 28 0
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 8:00-9:00
Base Vol: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 xxxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 xxxxx xxxxx 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 53 46 xxxxx xxxx 47 14 14 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 951 850 xxxxx xxxx 849 1072 1617 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 935 846 xxxxx xxxx 845 1072 1617 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.03 xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 866 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 909 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 9.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * A * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.3 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A A * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-20
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 ApproachDel: 9.3 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=37]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=91] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=15]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 39
Minor Approach Volume: 37
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1085
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-21
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #5: Hope St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 5 10 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

8 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 1

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 14 1!

Critical V/C: 0.033

1! 13
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 5.9

0 3 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 5.9

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 9 28 0
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-22
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 ApproachDel: 9.3 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=37]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=15]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-23
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #5: Hope St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 5 11 0
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

8 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 1

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 14 1!

Critical V/C: 0.037

1! 13
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 5.6

0 18 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 5.6

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 18 31 0
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 9 28 0 0 10 5 8 14 3 0 13 1 Added Vol: 9 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 18 31 0 0 11 5 8 14 18 0 13 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 18 31 0 0 11 5 8 14 18 0 13 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 18 31 0 0 11 5 8 14 18 0 13 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 61 53 xxxxx xxxx 62 14 14 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 940 842 xxxxx xxxx 833 1072 1617 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 923 838 xxxxx xxxx 829 1072 1617 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.04 xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 867 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 892 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 9.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * A * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.4 9.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A A * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-24
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 18 31 0 0 11 5 8 14 18 0 13 1 ApproachDel: 9.4 9.1 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=49]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=119] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=16]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Initial Vol: 18 31 0 0 11 5 8 14 18 0 13 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 54
Minor Approach Volume: 49
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-25
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #6: Hope St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 2 9 1
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 4 1!

Critical V/C: 0.005

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.2

0 1 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.2

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 0 35 3
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 8:00-9:00
Base Vol: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 38 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 50 10 51 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1585 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 845 1077 953 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1585 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 845 1077 949 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 883 xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.1 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * A * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.1 8.8 ApproachLOS: * * A A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-26
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.1 8.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=5]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=57] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=2]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 50
Minor Approach Volume: 5
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1018
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-27
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #6: Hope St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 2 9 1
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 4 1!

Critical V/C: 0.005

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.2

0 1 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.2

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 0 35 3
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-28
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.1 8.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=5]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=2]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-29
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #6: Hope St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 1 23 3
Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.002

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.5

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.5

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 47 3
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 35 3 1 9 2 0 4 1 2 0 0 Added Vol: 0 12 0 0 14 -1 0 0 -1 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 2 0 0 -2 -4 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 47 3 3 23 1 -2 0 0 2 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 47 3 3 23 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 47 3 3 23 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 xxxxx 6.4 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 xxxxx 3.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 50 xxxx xxxxx 78 80 xxxxx 78 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1570 xxxx xxxxx 916 815 xxxxx 930 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1570 xxxx xxxxx 914 813 xxxxx 928 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.9 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-30
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 47 3 3 23 1 -2 0 0 2 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.9 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=OVERFLOW]
SUCCEED - Vehicle-hours greater than or equal to 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=-2]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=77] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=2]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 47 3 3 23 1 -2 0 0 2 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 77
Minor Approach Volume: 2
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 903
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-31
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #7: Hope St/El Camino Real

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 3 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 36

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

1 1255 2

Critical V/C: 0.007

2 1541
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 20 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1
Final Vol: 0 0 4
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 7:45-8:45
Base Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1255 20 0 1541 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1255 20 0 1541 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1255 20 0 1541 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1255 20 0 1541 36 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1255 20 0 1541 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 428 xxxx xxxx 532 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 580 xxxx xxxx 497 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 580 xxxx xxxx 497 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 11.2 xxxxx xxxx 12.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * B * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 11.2 12.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-32
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1255 20 0 1541 36 ApproachDel: 11.2 12.3 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=4]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=2859] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=3]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1255 20 0 1541 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 2852
Minor Approach Volume: 4
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -76 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-33
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #7: Hope St/El Camino Real

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 3 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 36

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

1 1266 2

Critical V/C: 0.007

2 1564
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 20 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1
Final Vol: 0 0 4
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 432 xxxx xxxx 539 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 577 xxxx xxxx 492 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 577 xxxx xxxx 492 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxx 12.4 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * B * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 11.3 12.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-34
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 ApproachDel: 11.3 12.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=4]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=2893] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=3]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 2886
Minor Approach Volume: 4
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -80 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-35
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #7: Hope St/El Camino Real

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 34 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 45

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

1 1288 2

Critical V/C: 0.070

2 1564
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.2

0 20 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.2

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1
Final Vol: 0 0 4
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1266 20 0 1564 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 18 0 0 0 9 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 4 0 0 34 0 1288 20 0 1564 45 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 4 0 0 34 0 1288 20 0 1564 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 4 0 0 34 0 1288 20 0 1564 45 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 439 xxxx xxxx 544 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 571 xxxx xxxx 489 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 571 xxxx xxxx 489 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 11.3 xxxxx xxxx 12.9 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * B * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 11.3 12.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-36
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 34 0 1288 20 0 1564 45 ApproachDel: 11.3 12.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=4]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=2955] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=34]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 4 0 0 34 0 1288 20 0 1564 45 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 2917
Minor Approach Volume: 34
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -84 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-37
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #8: Castro St/Church St

Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 8 92 4***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

21 1

Cycle Time (sec): 62

0 21

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 78*** 0

Critical V/C: 0.302

0 78
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 14.1

0 48 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 15.8

1 32***
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 45 226*** 49
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 8:00-9:00
Base Vol: 45 226 49 4 92 8 21 78 48 32 78 21 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 45 226 49 4 92 8 21 78 48 32 78 21 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 45 226 49 4 92 8 21 78 48 32 78 21 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 45 226 49 4 92 8 21 78 48 32 78 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 45 226 49 4 92 8 21 78 48 32 78 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 45 226 49 4 92 8 21 78 48 32 78 21 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.62 0.38 1.00 0.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1750 1479 321 1750 1656 144 1750 1114 686 1750 1418 382 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 10.1 31.4 31.4 0.5 21.8 21.8 3.2 14.4 14.4 3.8 14.9 14.9 Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.16 0.16 0.23 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.23 0.23 Delay/Veh: 22.6 9.1 9.1 43.0 13.9 13.9 29.5 20.1 20.1 29.5 19.2 19.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 22.6 9.1 9.1 43.0 13.9 13.9 29.5 20.1 20.1 29.5 19.2 19.2 LOS by Move: C A A D B B C C C C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 1 3 3 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-38
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #8: Castro St/Church St

Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 14 99 4***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

22 1

Cycle Time (sec): 62

0 21

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 78*** 0

Critical V/C: 0.309

0 80
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 14.2

0 56 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 16.3

1 32***
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 80 229*** 49
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 0.88 0.12 1.00 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1750 1483 317 1750 1577 223 1750 1048 752 1750 1426 374 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 13.2 31.0 31.0 0.5 18.2 18.2 3.4 14.9 14.9 3.7 15.2 15.2 Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.21 0.21 0.23 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.23 0.23 Delay/Veh: 20.4 9.4 9.4 43.8 16.7 16.7 29.3 19.7 19.7 29.7 19.0 19.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 20.4 9.4 9.4 43.8 16.7 16.7 29.3 19.7 19.7 29.7 19.0 19.0 LOS by Move: C A A D B B C B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 2 3 3 0 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-39
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #8: Castro St/Church St

Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 14 97 4***
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

22 1

Cycle Time (sec): 62

0 21

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 78*** 0

Critical V/C: 0.312

0 80
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 14.3

0 59 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 16.4

1 32***
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 85 230*** 49
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 80 229 49 4 99 14 22 78 56 32 80 21 Added Vol: 5 1 0 0 -2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 85 230 49 4 97 14 22 78 59 32 80 21 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 85 230 49 4 97 14 22 78 59 32 80 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 85 230 49 4 97 14 22 78 59 32 80 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 85 230 49 4 97 14 22 78 59 32 80 21 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 0.87 0.13 1.00 0.57 0.43 1.00 0.79 0.21 Final Sat.: 1750 1484 316 1750 1573 227 1750 1025 775 1750 1426 374 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.01 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 13.8 30.8 30.8 0.5 17.5 17.5 3.4 15.1 15.1 3.6 15.3 15.3 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.22 0.22 0.23 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.23 0.23 Delay/Veh: 20.0 9.5 9.5 44.1 17.3 17.3 29.2 19.6 19.6 29.7 18.9 18.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 20.0 9.5 9.5 44.1 17.3 17.3 29.2 19.6 19.6 29.7 18.9 18.9 LOS by Move: C A A D B B C B B C B B HCM2kAvgQ: 2 3 3 0 2 2 0 2 2 1 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-40
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #9: Shoreline Blvd/Church St

Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 12 628 81***
Lanes: 0 1 2 0 1

Signal=Permit

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Overlap Lanes: Final Vol:

26 0

Cycle Time (sec): 113

1 78

1 Loss Time (sec): 9

0 36*** 0

Critical V/C: 0.225

0 25
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 17.0

1 81 1

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 18.1

0 29
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 23 680*** 28
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 7:45-8:45
Base Vol: 23 680 28 81 628 12 26 36 81 29 25 78 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 680 28 81 628 12 26 36 81 29 25 78 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 680 28 81 628 12 26 36 81 29 25 78 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 680 28 81 628 12 26 36 81 29 25 78 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 680 28 81 628 12 26 36 81 29 25 78 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 680 28 81 628 12 26 36 81 29 25 78 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 2.88 0.12 1.00 2.94 0.06 0.42 0.58 1.00 0.54 0.46 1.00 Final Sat.: 1750 5378 221 1750 5495 105 755 1045 1750 967 833 1750 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 30.5 63.5 63.5 23.2 56.2 56.2 17.3 17.3 47.8 17.3 17.3 40.5 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.12 Delay/Veh: 30.6 12.5 12.5 37.7 16.1 16.1 42.4 42.4 19.8 42.1 42.1 24.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.6 12.5 12.5 37.7 16.1 16.1 42.4 42.4 19.8 42.1 42.1 24.4 LOS by Move: C B B D B B D D B D D C HCM2kAvgQ: 1 4 4 3 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-41
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #9: Shoreline Blvd/Church St

Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 12 635 130***
Lanes: 0 1 2 0 1

Signal=Permit

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes: Final Vol:

26 0

Cycle Time (sec): 113

1 88

1 Loss Time (sec): 9

0 36*** 0

Critical V/C: 0.258

0 25
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 20.4

1 81 1

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 19.4

0 30
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 23 683*** 36
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 2.84 0.16 1.00 2.94 0.06 0.42 0.58 1.00 0.55 0.45 1.00 Final Sat.: 1750 5319 280 1750 5496 104 755 1045 1750 982 818 1750 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 31.0 56.3 56.3 32.6 57.9 57.9 15.1 15.1 46.1 15.1 15.1 47.7 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.12 Delay/Veh: 30.2 16.4 16.4 31.2 15.2 15.2 44.5 44.5 20.8 44.2 44.2 19.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.2 16.4 16.4 31.2 15.2 15.2 44.5 44.5 20.8 44.2 44.2 19.9 LOS by Move: C B B C B B D D C D D B HCM2kAvgQ: 1 5 5 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-42
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #9: Shoreline Blvd/Church St

Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 12 629 133***
Lanes: 0 1 2 0 1

Signal=Permit

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes: Final Vol:

26 0

Cycle Time (sec): 113

1 93

1 Loss Time (sec): 9

0 36*** 0

Critical V/C: 0.260

0 25
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 20.6

1 81 1

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 19.5

0 30
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol: 23 683*** 36
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 23 683 36 130 635 12 26 36 81 30 25 88 Added Vol: 0 0 0 3 -6 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 683 36 133 629 12 26 36 81 30 25 93 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 683 36 133 629 12 26 36 81 30 25 93 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 23 683 36 133 629 12 26 36 81 30 25 93 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 23 683 36 133 629 12 26 36 81 30 25 93 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 2.84 0.16 1.00 2.94 0.06 0.42 0.58 1.00 0.55 0.45 1.00 Final Sat.: 1750 5319 280 1750 5495 105 755 1045 1750 982 818 1750 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 31.3 55.9 55.9 33.1 57.7 57.7 15.0 15.0 46.3 15.0 15.0 48.1 Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.22 0.22 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.12 Delay/Veh: 30.0 16.6 16.6 30.8 15.3 15.3 44.6 44.6 20.7 44.3 44.3 19.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.0 16.6 16.6 30.8 15.3 15.3 44.6 44.6 20.7 44.3 44.3 19.8 LOS by Move: C B B C B B D D C D D B HCM2kAvgQ: 1 5 5 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-43
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #11: Hope St/Prj Dwy

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 3 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.000

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0
Final Vol: 0 36 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 39 39 3 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 978 857 1087 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 978 857 1087 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Hope St/Prj Dwy
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-44
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Hope St/Prj Dwy
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 39
Minor Approach Volume: 0
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1085
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-45
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #11: Hope St/Prj Dwy

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 3 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.000

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0
Final Vol: 0 36 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Hope St/Prj Dwy
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-46
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-47
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #11: Hope St/Prj Dwy

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 14 2 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

12 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.031

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 4.3

0 33 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 4.3

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0
Final Vol: 9 36 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 36 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 9 0 0 0 -1 14 12 0 33 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 9 36 0 0 2 14 12 0 33 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 9 36 0 0 2 14 12 0 33 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 9 36 0 0 2 14 12 0 33 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 16 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 63 63 9 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1615 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 948 832 1079 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1615 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 944 827 1079 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.00 0.03 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1039 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * A * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * A * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Hope St/Prj Dwy
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-48
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 9 36 0 0 2 14 12 0 33 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.6 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=45]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=106] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 Hope St/Prj Dwy
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 9 36 0 0 2 14 12 0 33 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 61
Minor Approach Volume: 45
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 965
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-49
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1001: Castro St/El Camino Real

Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 39 67*** 105
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

112***

1 Cycle Time (sec): 180

0 207

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 1001 2

Critical V/C: 0.474

2 1046***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 43.7

0 44 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 41.9

1 143
LOS: D

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol: 95 113*** 177
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 8:00-9:00
Base Vol: 95 113 177 105 67 39 112 1001 44 143 1046 207 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 113 177 105 67 39 112 1001 44 143 1046 207 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 95 113 177 105 67 39 112 1001 44 143 1046 207 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 95 113 177 105 67 39 112 1001 44 143 1046 207 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 95 113 177 105 67 39 112 1001 44 143 1046 207 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 95 113 177 105 67 39 112 1001 44 143 1046 207 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 0.46 0.54 1.00 1.51 0.94 0.55 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.49 0.51 Final Sat.: 822 978 1750 2662 1699 989 1750 5364 236 1750 4674 925 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 43.8 43.8 77.1 15.0 15.0 15.0 24.3 75.9 75.9 33.3 84.9 84.9 Volume/Cap: 0.47 0.47 0.24 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.47 0.47 Delay/Veh: 59.0 59.0 32.9 79.6 79.6 79.6 73.5 37.1 37.1 66.1 32.5 32.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 59.0 59.0 32.9 79.6 79.6 79.6 73.5 37.1 37.1 66.1 32.5 32.5 LOS by Move: E E C E E E E D D E C C HCM2kAvgQ: 10 10 6 4 4 4 6 13 13 8 15 15 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-50
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #1001: Castro St/El Camino Real

Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 41 69*** 116
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

119***

1 Cycle Time (sec): 180

0 230

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 1001 2

Critical V/C: 0.491

2 1046***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 44.8

0 44 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 42.7

1 143
LOS: D

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol: 95*** 121 177
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap

Base Vol: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 0.44 0.56 1.00 1.55 0.91 0.54 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.44 0.56 Final Sat.: 792 1008 1750 2746 1633 970 1750 5364 236 1750 4589 1009 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.08 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 44.0 44.0 77.0 15.5 15.5 15.5 24.9 75.5 75.5 33.0 83.6 83.6 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.49 0.24 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.49 0.49 Delay/Veh: 59.2 59.2 32.9 79.3 79.3 79.3 73.2 37.5 37.5 66.3 33.6 33.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 59.2 59.2 32.9 79.3 79.3 79.3 73.2 37.5 37.5 66.3 33.6 33.6 LOS by Move: E E C E E E E D D E C C HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 6 5 5 5 6 13 13 8 16 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-51
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #1001: Castro St/El Camino Real

Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 41 69*** 116
Lanes: 0 1 0 1 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

112***

1 Cycle Time (sec): 180

0 230

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 1005 2

Critical V/C: 0.489

2 1056***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 44.2

0 44 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 43.1

1 164
LOS: D

Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol: 95*** 121 177
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap

Base Vol: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 95 121 177 116 69 41 119 1001 44 143 1046 230 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 -3 0 0 21 10 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 -4 4 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 95 121 177 116 69 41 112 1005 44 164 1056 230 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 95 121 177 116 69 41 112 1005 44 164 1056 230 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 95 121 177 116 69 41 112 1005 44 164 1056 230 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 95 121 177 116 69 41 112 1005 44 164 1056 230 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 0.44 0.56 1.00 1.55 0.91 0.54 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.44 0.56 Final Sat.: 792 1008 1750 2746 1633 970 1750 5365 235 1750 4597 1001 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.19 0.19 0.09 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 44.2 44.2 80.3 15.6 15.6 15.6 23.6 72.1 72.1 36.1 84.6 84.6 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.49 0.23 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.49 0.49 Delay/Veh: 59.1 59.1 30.9 79.2 79.2 79.2 74.2 39.9 39.9 64.5 32.9 32.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 59.1 59.1 30.9 79.2 79.2 79.2 74.2 39.9 39.9 64.5 32.9 32.9 LOS by Move: E E C E E E E D D E C C HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 6 5 5 5 6 14 14 9 16 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-52
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1004: Shoreline Blvd/Miramonte Ave and El Camino Real

Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol: 218 331 172***
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

292***

2 Cycle Time (sec): 192

0 116

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 779 2

Critical V/C: 0.540

2 1110***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 52.1

0 127 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 50.4

1 114
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol: 145 297*** 50
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 7:45-8:45
Base Vol: 145 297 50 172 331 218 292 779 127 114 1110 116 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 145 297 50 172 331 218 292 779 127 114 1110 116 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 145 297 50 172 331 218 292 779 127 114 1110 116 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 145 297 50 172 331 218 292 779 127 114 1110 116 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 145 297 50 172 331 218 292 779 127 114 1110 116 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 145 297 50 172 331 218 292 779 127 114 1110 116 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.56 0.44 1.00 2.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 1750 3166 533 1750 3800 1750 3150 4814 785 1750 5069 530 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 33.3 33.4 33.4 35.0 35.0 68.0 33.0 79.0 79.0 31.8 77.9 77.9 Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.48 0.35 0.54 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.54 0.54 Delay/Veh: 68.2 68.7 68.7 68.6 66.4 43.2 69.1 37.3 37.3 67.9 41.0 41.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68.2 68.7 68.7 68.6 66.4 43.2 69.1 37.3 37.3 67.9 41.0 41.0 LOS by Move: E E E E E D E D D E D D HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 9 8 9 9 11 11 6 17 17 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-53
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background AM
Intersection #1004: Shoreline Blvd/Miramonte Ave and El Camino Real

Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol: 226 331 172***
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

303***

2 Cycle Time (sec): 192

0 116

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 786 2

Critical V/C: 0.544

2 1112***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 52.4

0 127 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 50.4

1 114
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol: 145 297*** 50
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.57 0.43 1.00 2.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 1750 3166 533 1750 3800 1750 3150 4820 779 1750 5070 529 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.13 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 33.1 33.1 33.1 34.7 34.8 68.7 34.0 79.6 79.6 31.8 77.4 77.4 Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.48 0.36 0.54 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.54 0.54 Delay/Veh: 68.5 69.0 69.0 68.9 66.7 43.0 68.6 37.0 37.0 67.9 41.3 41.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68.5 69.0 69.0 68.9 66.7 43.0 68.6 37.0 37.0 67.9 41.3 41.3 LOS by Move: E E E E E D E D D E D D HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 9 8 10 9 11 11 6 17 17 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:21:34 2025 Page 3-54
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj AM
Intersection #1004: Shoreline Blvd/Miramonte Ave and El Camino Real

Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol: 226 331 166***
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1

Signal=Protect

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

303***

2 Cycle Time (sec): 192

0 116

0 Loss Time (sec): 12

1 789 2

Critical V/C: 0.542

2 1122***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 51.9

0 127 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 50.1

1 114
LOS: D

Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol: 145 297*** 50
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 145 297 50 172 331 226 303 786 127 114 1112 116 Added Vol: 0 0 0 -6 0 0 0 3 0 0 10 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 145 297 50 166 331 226 303 789 127 114 1122 116 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 145 297 50 166 331 226 303 789 127 114 1122 116 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 145 297 50 166 331 226 303 789 127 114 1122 116 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 145 297 50 166 331 226 303 789 127 114 1122 116 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.57 0.43 1.00 2.71 0.29 Final Sat.: 1750 3166 533 1750 3800 1750 3150 4823 776 1750 5075 525 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.22 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 32.6 33.2 33.2 33.6 34.2 68.3 34.1 80.4 80.4 32.0 78.3 78.3 Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.49 0.36 0.54 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.54 0.54 Delay/Veh: 68.9 68.9 68.9 69.7 67.1 43.2 68.5 36.5 36.5 67.7 40.8 40.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68.9 68.9 68.9 69.7 67.1 43.2 68.5 36.5 36.5 67.7 40.8 40.8 LOS by Move: E E E E E D E D D E D D HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 9 8 10 9 11 11 6 17 17 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose 881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #2: Castro St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 351 2
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.002

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 313 25
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 5:15-6:15
Base Vol: 0 313 25 2 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 313 25 2 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 313 25 2 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 313 25 2 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 313 25 2 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 338 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1232 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1232 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 313 25 2 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 313 25 2 351 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 691
Minor Approach Volume: 0
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 412
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background PM
Intersection #2: Castro St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 390 2
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.002

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 332 25
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 357 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1213 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1213 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 749
Minor Approach Volume: 0
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 384
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj PM
Intersection #2: Castro St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 390 0
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.000

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.0

0 0
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0
Final Vol: 0 346 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 332 25 2 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 11 -1 0 -3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 3 -24 -2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 346 0 0 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 346 0 0 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 346 0 0 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 346 0 0 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 Castro St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 346 0 0 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 736
Minor Approach Volume: 0
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 301
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-7
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #3: Castro St/High School Way

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 26 263 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

20 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.122

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 2.5

0 94 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 2.5

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0
Final Vol: 65 255 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 5:15-6:15
Base Vol: 65 255 0 0 263 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 65 255 0 0 263 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 65 255 0 0 263 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 65 255 0 0 263 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 65 255 0 0 263 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 289 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 661 661 276 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1284 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 431 385 768 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1284 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 414 366 768 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.12 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 668 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.5 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.5 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 65 255 0 0 263 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.5 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.4]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=114]
SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=723] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 65 255 0 0 263 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 609
Minor Approach Volume: 114
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 456
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background PM
Intersection #3: Castro St/High School Way

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 26 302 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

20 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.129

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 2.4

0 94 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 2.4

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0
Final Vol: 65 274 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 328 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 719 719 315 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1243 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 398 357 730 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1243 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 382 338 730 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.13 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 630 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.0 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.0 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.4]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=114]
SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=781] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 667
Minor Approach Volume: 114
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 424
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-11
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj PM
Intersection #3: Castro St/High School Way

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 26 300 0
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

20 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 0

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 1!

Critical V/C: 0.128

0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 2.4

0 94 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 2.4

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0
Final Vol: 65 285 0
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 65 274 0 0 302 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 8 0 0 -3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 65 285 0 0 300 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 65 285 0 0 300 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 65 285 0 0 300 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 326 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 728 728 313 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1245 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 393 353 732 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1245 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 378 334 732 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.05 0.00 0.13 xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 629 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * B * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.0 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * B * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 65 285 0 0 300 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.0 xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.4]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=114]
SUCCEED - Approach volume greater than or equal to 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=790] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #3 Castro St/High School Way
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Vol: 65 285 0 0 300 26 20 0 94 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 676
Minor Approach Volume: 114
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 420
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-13
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #4: Castro St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 254 8
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 11

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.075

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.1

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.1

0 38
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 257 20
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 5:15-6:15
Base Vol: 0 257 20 8 254 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 257 20 8 254 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 257 20 8 254 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 257 20 8 254 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 257 20 8 254 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 277 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 537 537 267 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1298 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 508 453 777 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1298 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 506 450 777 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.08 0.00 0.01 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 549 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-14
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 257 20 8 254 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.2 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=49]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=588] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 257 20 8 254 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 539
Minor Approach Volume: 49
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 498
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background PM
Intersection #4: Castro St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 293 8
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 11

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.081

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.1

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.1

0 38
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 276 20
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 296 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 595 595 286 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1277 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 470 420 758 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1277 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 468 417 758 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.08 0.00 0.01 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 512 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.8 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=49]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=646] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 597
Minor Approach Volume: 49
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 463
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-17
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj PM
Intersection #4: Castro St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 290 20
Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 20

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.087

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 1.4

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 1.4

0 39
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 273 34
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 276 20 8 293 0 0 0 0 38 0 11 Added Vol: 0 -2 10 9 0 0 0 0 0 -3 0 7 PasserByVol: 0 -1 4 3 -3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 Initial Fut: 0 273 34 20 290 0 0 0 0 39 0 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 273 34 20 290 0 0 0 0 39 0 20 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 273 34 20 290 0 0 0 0 39 0 20 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 307 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 620 620 290 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1265 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 455 407 754 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1265 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 449 400 754 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.09 0.00 0.03 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 521 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 12.8 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 ApproachLOS: * * * B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-18
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 273 34 20 290 0 0 0 0 39 0 20 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 12.8 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.2]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=59]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=676] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 650 for intersection with less than four approaches.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 Castro St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 273 34 20 290 0 0 0 0 39 0 20 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 617
Minor Approach Volume: 59
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 451
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-19
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #5: Hope St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 12 11 1
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

8 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 1

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 20 1!

Critical V/C: 0.040

1! 20
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 6.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 6.0

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 14 33 1
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 5:15-6:15
Base Vol: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 72 61 20 78 61 21 21 xxxx xxxxx 20 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 924 834 1064 916 834 1063 1608 xxxx xxxxx 1609 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 900 829 1064 884 829 1063 1608 xxxx xxxxx 1609 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.2 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 852 xxxxx xxxx 934 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.5 xxxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A * * A * A * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.5 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A A * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-20
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 ApproachDel: 9.5 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=48]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=123] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=24]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 51
Minor Approach Volume: 48
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-21
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background PM
Intersection #5: Hope St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 12 11 1
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

8 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 1

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 20 1!

Critical V/C: 0.040

1! 20
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 6.0

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 6.0

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 14 33 1
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-22
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 ApproachDel: 9.5 9.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=48]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=24]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 51
Minor Approach Volume: 48
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 1013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-23
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj PM
Intersection #5: Hope St/Yosemite Ave

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 12 15 1
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

11 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 1

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 20 1!

Critical V/C: 0.037

1! 20
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 5.3

0 28 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 5.3

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 23 30 1
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 14 33 1 1 11 12 8 20 0 2 20 1 Added Vol: 7 3 0 0 4 0 -3 0 21 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 2 -6 0 0 0 0 6 0 7 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 30 1 1 15 12 11 20 28 2 20 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 23 30 1 1 15 12 11 20 28 2 20 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 23 30 1 1 15 12 11 20 28 2 20 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: 94 81 34 96 95 21 21 xxxx xxxxx 48 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 894 813 1045 891 799 1063 1608 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 866 806 1045 860 793 1063 1608 xxxx xxxxx 1572 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.03 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 834 xxxxx xxxx 893 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 9.6 xxxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * A * * A * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 9.6 9.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: A A * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-24
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 23 30 1 1 15 12 11 20 28 2 20 1 ApproachDel: 9.6 9.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=54]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=164] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=28]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 Hope St/Yosemite Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 23 30 1 1 15 12 11 20 28 2 20 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 82
Minor Approach Volume: 54
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 886
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-25
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #6: Hope St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 1 7 3
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

10 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 4

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 20 1!

Critical V/C: 0.024

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 4.4

0 8 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 4.4

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 4 39 4
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 5:45-6:45
Base Vol: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: 8 xxxx xxxxx 43 xxxx xxxxx 65 65 8 77 63 41 Potent Cap.: 1625 xxxx xxxxx 1579 xxxx xxxxx 934 830 1081 918 832 1036 Move Cap.: 1625 xxxx xxxxx 1579 xxxx xxxxx 928 826 1081 891 828 1036 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.2 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 897 xxxxx xxxx 983 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * A * * A * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.2 8.7 ApproachLOS: * * A A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-26
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.2 8.7 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=38]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=102] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=6]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 58
Minor Approach Volume: 38
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 979
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-27
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background PM
Intersection #6: Hope St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 1 7 3
Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

10 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 4

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 20 1!

Critical V/C: 0.024

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 4.4

0 8 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 4.4

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0
Final Vol: 4 39 4
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-28
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 9.2 8.7 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=38]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=6]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 58
Minor Approach Volume: 38
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 979
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-29
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj PM
Intersection #6: Hope St/Fairmont Ave

Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 0 37 5
Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0

Signal=Stop

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 4

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

0 0 0

Critical V/C: 0.004

1! 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.9

0 0 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.9

0 2
LOS: A

Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0
Final Vol: 0 51 4
Signal=Uncontrol/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 4 39 4 3 7 1 10 20 8 2 0 4 Added Vol: -4 10 0 0 25 -1 -1 0 -4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 2 0 2 5 0 -10 -20 -4 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 51 4 5 37 0 -1 0 0 2 0 4 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 51 4 5 37 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 51 4 5 37 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 6.4 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 55 xxxx xxxxx 102 102 37 100 100 53 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1563 xxxx xxxxx 884 792 1041 904 794 1020 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1563 xxxx xxxxx 878 789 1041 901 791 1020 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx 977 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * * * * A * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.7 ApproachLOS: * * * A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-30
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 51 4 5 37 0 -1 0 0 2 0 4 ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 8.7 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[eastbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=OVERFLOW]
SUCCEED - Vehicle-hours greater than or equal to 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=-1]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=3][total volume=102] FAIL - Total volume less than 650 for intersection
with less than four approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[westbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.0]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=6]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 Hope St/Fairmont Ave
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Initial Vol: 0 51 4 5 37 0 -1 0 0 2 0 4 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 97
Minor Approach Volume: 6
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: 842
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-31
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #7: Hope St/El Camino Real

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 17 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 9/12/2024 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 36

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

1 1496 2

Critical V/C: 0.037

2 1661
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.1

0 10 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.1

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1
Final Vol: 0 0 19
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Sep 2024 << 5:30-6:30
Base Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1496 10 0 1661 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1496 10 0 1661 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1496 10 0 1661 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1496 10 0 1661 36 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1496 10 0 1661 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 504 xxxx xxxx 572 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 519 xxxx xxxx 469 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 519 xxxx xxxx 469 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 12.2 xxxxx xxxx 13.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * B * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 12.2 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-32
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1496 10 0 1661 36 ApproachDel: 12.2 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=19]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=3239] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=17]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1496 10 0 1661 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 3203
Minor Approach Volume: 19
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -116 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-33
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background PM
Intersection #7: Hope St/El Camino Real

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 17 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 36

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

1 1520 2

Critical V/C: 0.037

2 1675
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.1

0 10 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.1

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1
Final Vol: 0 0 19
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 512 xxxx xxxx 576 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 513 xxxx xxxx 465 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 513 xxxx xxxx 465 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 12.3 xxxxx xxxx 13.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * B * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 12.3 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-34
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 ApproachDel: 12.3 13.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=19]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=3277] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=17]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 3241
Minor Approach Volume: 19
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -120 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-35
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose

881 Castro Street
Mountain View, CA
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Unsignalized (Future Volume Alternative)
Background + Prj PM
Intersection #7: Hope St/El Camino Real

Signal=Stop/Rights=Include
Final Vol: 38 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 0

Signal=Uncontrol

Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol:

0 0

Cycle Time (sec): 100

0 53

0 Loss Time (sec): 0

1 1554 2

Critical V/C: 0.083

2 1672
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 0.2

0 10 0

Avg Delay (sec/veh): 0.2

0 0
LOS: B

Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1
Final Vol: 0 0 19
Signal=Stop/Rights=Include

Base Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 19 0 0 17 0 1520 10 0 1675 36 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 10 0 0 0 14 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 24 0 0 -3 3 Initial Fut: 0 0 19 0 0 38 0 1554 10 0 1672 53 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 19 0 0 38 0 1554 10 0 1672 53 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 19 0 0 38 0 1554 10 0 1672 53 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Critical Gap Module:

Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 523 xxxx xxxx 584 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 504 xxxx xxxx 460 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 504 xxxx xxxx 460 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx 0.08 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Level Of Service Module:
2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 12.4 xxxxx xxxx 13.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * B * * B * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 12.4 13.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.

Peak Hour Delay Signal Warrant Report
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| COMPARE Wed Feb 12 12:14:10 2025 Page 3-36
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 38 0 1554 10 0 1672 53 ApproachDel: 12.4 13.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach[northbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=19]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #3: [approach count=4][total volume=3346] SUCCEED - Total volume greater than or equal to 800 for intersection with four or more approaches.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Approach[southbound][lanes=1][control=Stop Sign]
Signal Warrant Rule #1: [vehicle-hours=0.1]
FAIL - Vehicle-hours less than 4 for one lane approach.

Signal Warrant Rule #2: [approach volume=38]
FAIL - Approach volume less than 100 for one lane approach.

Peak Hour Volume Signal Warrant Report [Urban]
******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 Hope St/El Camino Real
******************************************************************************** Future Volume Alternative: Peak Hour Warrant NOT Met
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 Initial Vol: 0 0 19 0 0 38 0 1554 10 0 1672 53 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Major Street Volume: 3289
Minor Approach Volume: 38
Minor Approach Volume Threshold: -125 [less than minimum of 100] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mountain View City CouncilApril 28, 2026

Mountain View City Council
April 28, 2026