Attachment 2
1 Active Transportation Plan – April-May 2026 Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Council Transportation Committee and Community Feedback Summary of Feedback Themes and Plan Revisions
08-27-2026
As part of the public engagement process for the review of the Mountain View Active Transportation Plan (MVATP), the project team presented the draft document in a series of meetings including:
• Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) on April 29, 2026 • Public Workshop on May 4, 2026
• Council Transportation Committee (CTC) on June 16, 2026 The draft MVATP was available for public review from April 20, 2026 through May 18, 2026.
During the public review period, staff met with community members and received written input through the project website and by email. During the BPAC and CTC meetings, members offered positive feedback on the plan’s thoroughness and readability and recommended additions to the recommended policies and programs.
The key themes raised by BPAC, CTC, and community members were:
• Request the Final Plan be reviewed by BPAC and CTC prior to bringing to City Council • Strengthen the Programs and Policies section by referencing adopted local plans and explaining how the MVATP will coordinate with them
• More focus on pedestrian improvements in MVATP
• Greater consistency across sections of the plan
• Better highlight the MVATP’s role in advancing sustainability • Add performance metrics, defined outcomes (such as safety, mode shift, and comfort), and better multimodal data collection
This attachment summarizes the key themes raised by BPAC, CTC, and community members, and identifies where and how those themes have been addressed in the Final Plan.
Attachment 2
2 Feedback Theme How Addressed
Request for additional round
of review of the updated plan
by BPAC and CTC
• Staff will present the Final Plan to BPAC and CTC in August 2026, requesting the committees recommend the MVATP
for approval.
Strengthen the Programs and
Policies section by referencing
adopted local plans and
explaining how the MVATP
will coordinate with them
• Referenced the Vision Zero Action Plan and Local Roadway Safety Plan, Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan and
Biodiversity and Urban Forest Plan in Executive Summary, “Committing to a Safe and Active Community” (page x)
• Added sentence noting that “The MVATP actions
complement related actions in other city planning efforts, including….” in Introduction, “Why Does This Plan Matter and How Will It be Used?” (page 10)
• Added a reference to the Vision Zero Action Plan/Local Road Safey Plan in Chapter 3, “Policy and Program
Recommendations” (page 48)
• Added the following policies:
o Updated Design Standards to be Informed by Best
Practices (page 48)
o Upgrade Pedestrian Signals to Accessible Pedestrian
Signals (page 49)
o Managing and Enforcing the Transportation System
of All Road Users (page 51)
o Develop Key Performance Indicators to Measure
Active Transportation Progress (page 54)
• Added callout boxes providing additional detail on several policies and programs to Chapter 3, including: Updated
Design Standards (page 48), Greening/Tree Canopy (page
50), Managing and Enforcing the Transportation System
(page 51), Transportation Demand Management (page 53),
and Social Walks/Rides (page 54).
• Added a new appendix listing the non-infrastructure
recommendations from the Vision Zero Action Plan/Local
Road Safety Plan, Appendix D.
Attachment 2
3 Feedback Theme How Addressed
More focus on pedestrian
improvements in MVATP
• Updated Prioritization Map to show priority intersection projects in addition to linear sidewalk and bikeway projects (pages xi, 47)
• Added a paragraph to call-out “What is a Paseo?” in Existing Conditions, page 19
• Revised “Holistic Pedestrian Map” to better show the
proposed crossing improvements, Chapter 2 (page 34)
• Expanded the project description for El Camino Real
improvements to include pedestrian improvements, Chapter 3, “What’s Working” (page 38)
• Expanded description of prioritization process to clarify that projects include bicycle and pedestrian improvements,
Chapter 3, “Scoring and Prioritizing Infrastructure Projects”, (pages 40-41)
• Added bicycle and pedestrian icons to “Table 6, MVATP Identified Priority Projects,” Chapter 3, (page 45-46)
• Added Upgrade Pedestrian Signals to Accessible Pedestrian Signals in Chapter 3, “Table 7: List of Recommended Policies and Programs” (page 49)
Attachment 2
4 Greater consistency across
sections of the plan
• Reviewed the recommended improvements and project
cutsheets to confirm consistency across Plan sections.
Revisions to Appendix B: Cutsheet Development are listed below:
• Whisman Road (Dana to Fairchild)
o Changed the Resurfacing narrative to match the
cross-section graphic
• Latham Street (Showers to Escuela)
o Revised the Reconstruction narrative to note that
“Sidewalk widening will be explored for the entire
length and determined based on space available and
ADA needs. Mature trees are intended to remain
with the proposed improvements.”
o Added note to all maps that show sidewalk widening
that widening “May consist of spot widening.” (page
xi, page 34, page 47)
• Latham/Church Street (Escuela to Castro)
o Revised the Reconstruction narrative to note that
“Sidewalk widening will be explored for the entire
length and determined based on space available and
ADA needs. Mature trees are intended to remain
with the proposed improvements.”
o Added note to all maps that show sidewalk widening
that widening “May consist of spot widening.” (page
xi, page 34, page 47)
• Rengstorff Avenue (Leghorn to Garcia)
o Revised Reconstruction narrative to note that the
project “coordinates with the VTA-led 101/San
Antonio/Rengstorff Interchange Improvement
project, which will improve crossings at US-101
ramps.”
• Dana Street (Bush to Moorpark)
o Changed the Resurfacing narrative to match the
cross-section graphic
• Dana Street (Bush to Moorpark)
o Changed the Resurfacing narrative to match the
cross-section graphic
Continued….
Attachment 2
5 Feedback Theme How Addressed
• Evelyn Avenue (Bush to Bernardo)
o Added reference to Sunnyvale’s project to construct
a Class I shared use path on the north side of Evelyn
to the Existing narrative.
• Sylvan Avenue/The Americana (Moorpark to Continental) o Changed the Resurfacing narrative to match the
cross-section graphic
o Added a note that “Cross-section shows the most
constrained section. South of Dana St, parking on
one side can be retained with this option.”
Better highlight the MVATP’s
role in advancing
sustainability
• Referenced the Parks and Recreation Strategic Plan and Biodiversity and Urban Forest Plan in:
o Executive Summary, “Committing to a Safe and
Active Community” (page x)
o Introduction, “Purpose and Process” (page 1)
o Introduction, “Why Does this Plan Matter and How
Will It Be Used?” (page 10)
• Expanded language in Chapter 2, “Plantable Space” (page 31)
• Added callout box providing additional detail on
Greening/Tree Canopy and how the MVATP and Biodiversity and Urban Forest Plan are complementary in “Policy and
Program Recommendations,” Chapter 3, (page 50)
Add performance metrics,
defined outcomes (such as
safety, mode shift, and
comfort), and better
multimodal data collection
• In Chapter 3, Policy and Program Recommendations section, added policy to develop key performance indicators,
measure them, report annually (page 54)