Final
July 21, 2016 1
City of Murrieta Development Impact Fee 2016 Update – Final Attachment 2
Final
July 21, 2016 2
Table E.2 shows the additional funding required to fully fund the planned facilities.
Fee Category
Net Project
Cost
Projected
Impact Fee
Revenue
Additional
Funding
Required
Law Enforcement DIF 9,786,567$ 8,567,000$ 1,219,567$ Fire DIF 16,701,426 16,701,426 -
Street DIF 350,851,903 315,035,646 35,816,256
Traffic Signal DIF 76,332,546 60,137,717 16,194,829 Storm Drain DIF 26,699,234 6,758,778 19,940,455 General Facility DIF 3,443,582 3,443,582 -
Parks & Recreation DIF 19,891,200 19,891,200 -
Community Center DIF 20,562,118 3,482,000 17,080,118 Library DIF 1,764,900 1,764,900 -
Total 526,033,476$ 435,782,250$ 90,251,225$
Sources: Tables 3.3, 3.6, 4.3, 5.4, 5.5, 6.2, 6.3, 7.3, 8.3, 10.7, 11.3, 11.6, and 12.4; Willdan Financial Services.
Table E.2: Non-Impact Fee Funding Required
Final
July 21, 2016 3
Table 2.1 presents the growth projections used in each section of the study. Each section will calculate a service population for facility type based on this information.
Table 2.1: Demographic Assumptions
2015 2035 Increase
Residents1 112,100 128,000 15,900
Dwelling Units2
Single Family 28,100 34,500 6,400
Multi-family 7,700 9,500 1,800
Total 35,800 44,000 8,200
Building Square Feet (000s)3
Commercial 5,573 19,637 14,064
Office 5,868 27,869 22,001
Industrial4
2,536 1,498 (1,037)
Total 13,977 49,005 35,028
Employment5
Commercial 8,100 38,200 30,100
Office 7,200 88,600 81,400
Industrial4
2,800 1,500 (1,300)
Total 18,100 128,300 110,200
Note: Figures have been rounded to the hundreds.
Sources: California Department of Finance (DOF), Table E-5, 2015; Murrieta General Plan EIR,Tables 5.2-3, 4 and 7; CA Employment Development Department Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, 3rd Quarter, 2012; Willdan Financial Services.
1 Current population from California Department of Finance (DOF). Projection for 2035 based on 2035 General Plan EIR.
2 Current values from DOF. Total future dw elling units from 2035 General Plan EIR, allocated to single and multi family based on current proportions. 5 Existing estimates based on data from CA EDD. Excludes government employees.
Future employees from 2035 General Plan EIR
3 Existing estimates and future employees from 2035 General Plan EIR 4 The City has rezoned some existing and future land uses as office.
Final
July 21, 2016 4
Table 2.2 displays the occupancy density factors used to allocate the fees in the fee schedule for each facility category.
Law Enforcement Facilities
Table 3.1 displays the service population for law enforcement facilities.
Table 2.2: Occupant Density
Residential
Single Family 3.42 Residents Per Dwelling Unit
Multifamily 2.39 Residents Per Dwelling Unit
Nonresidential
Commercial 2.39 Employees per 1,000 square feet Office 3.12 Employees per 1,000 square feet
Industrial 1.16 Employees per 1,000 square feet Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Tables B25024 and B25033; The Natelson Company, Inc., Employment Density Study Summary Report, prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments, October 31, 2001, SCAG region data; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 3.1: Law Enforcement Facilities Service Population Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2015) 112,100 18,100 117,700
New Development (2015-2035) 15,900 110,200 50,100 Total (2035) 128,000 128,300 167,800
Weighting factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 5
Tables 3.2 displays the City’s inventory of existing facilities law enforcement facilities.
Table 3.3 displays the City’s planned law enforcement facilities. The existing fund balance is subtracted from the total cost of planned facilities to determine the net cost of planned facilities.
Table 3.2: Law Enforcement Existing Facilities Inventory Inventory Unit Cost Value
Land (acres)
Police Station 5.95 280,000$ 1,666,000$
Buildings (square feet)
Police Headquarters 28,800 281$ 8,100,000$
Storage Building 7,158 168 1,200,000
Parking Shelter 3,852 29 110,000
Subtotal 9,410,000$
Vehicles (See Appendix Table A.1) 5,648,000$
Equipment
Telecommunications Equipment 1,220,000$
Police Headquarters Furniture and Equipment 700,000
Police Storage Furniture and Equipment 150,000
Subtotal 2,070,000$
Canines 5 15,000$ 75,000$
Total Value of Existing Facilities 18,869,000$
Sources: City of Murrieta; Appendix Table A.1,Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 6
Table 3.4 below shows the system standard calculation (existing + future facility value / future service population). Under the system standard the non-fee funding identified must be paid by the planning horizon, or new development has paid too high a fee.
Table 3.5 below shows the maximum justified impact fees resulting from using the system standard.
The City can charge any fee up to this amount.
Table 3.3 Planned Law Enforcement Facilities
Value
Buildings
Police Station Expansion 10,000,000$
(Less: Existing Fund Balance) (213,433)
Net Cost of Planned Facilities 9,786,567$
Sources: Capital Improvement Plan FY 2013-14 to FY 2017-18, City of Murrieta, California; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 3.4: Law Enforcement Facilities System Standard
Value of Existing Facilities 18,869,000$
Value of Planned Facilities 9,786,567
Total System Value (2035) 28,655,567$
Future Service Population (2035) 167,800
Cost per Capita 171$
Facility Standard per Resident 171$
Facility Standard per Worker1 53
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.
Sources: Tables 3.1 and 3.2; City of Murrieta; Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 7
Table 3.6 below shows the fee revenue resulting from using the system standard methodology. Under the system standard, the City must fund the remaining $1.2 million with a funding source other than impact fees, or new development will have paid too high a fee.
Table 3.5: Law Enforcement Facilities Fee - System Standard A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / 1,000
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee 1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee 1 Sq. Ft.
Residential
Single Family 171$ 3.42 585$ 12$ 597$ Multi-family 171 2.39 409 8 417 Nonresidential
Commercial 53$ 2.39 127$ 3$ 130$ 0.13$ Office 53 3.12 165 3 168 0.17 Industrial 53 1.16 61 1 62 0.06 Sources: Tables 2.2 and 3.4; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Persons per dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Table 3.6: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita 171$
Growth in Service Population (2015 - 2035) 50,100
Fee Revenue 8,567,000$
Cost of Planned Facilities 9,786,567
Non-Fee Revenue to Be Identified (1,219,567)$
Sources: Tables 3.1, 3.3 and 3.4.
Final
July 21, 2016 8
Appendix Table A.1: Police Vehicle Inventory
Description
Average
Unit Cost Units Total Value
1992 Ford Crown Victoria 56,000$ 1 56,000$ 2000 Dodge Dakota Pickup 25,000 1 25,000 2001 Ford Crown Victoria 56,000 3 168,000 2001 Ford Expedition 41,000 1 41,000 2001 Ford F150 41,000 1 41,000
2001 Ford Taurus 25,000 1 25,000
2003 Ford Expedition 41,000 1 41,000 2005 Ford Crown Victoria 56,000 1 56,000 2005 Ford Expedition 41,000 2 82,000 2005 Ford F150 41,000 1 41,000
2005 Ford F350 65,000 1 65,000
2005 Ford Taurus 25,000 1 25,000
2005 Freightliner Motorhome 300,000 1 300,000 2006 BMW 1200 35,000 1 35,000
2006 Dodge Charger 37,000 1 37,000
2006 Dodge Durango 35,000 2 70,000
2006 Ford Expedition 41,000 1 41,000 2006 Ford F150 41,000 3 123,000
2006 Ford F350 65,000 1 65,000
2007 BMW 1200 35,000 1 35,000
2007 Dodge Charger 37,000 1 37,000
2007 Ford Crown Victoria 56,000 1 56,000 2007 Ford F450 70,000 2 140,000
2007 Ford Ranger 25,000 3 75,000
2008 Dodge 1500 Pickup 41,000 1 41,000 2008 Dodge Charger 56,000 9 504,000
2008 Dodge Durango 35,000 3 105,000
2008 Dodge Ram Quad Cab 41,000 1 41,000 2008 Ford Ranger 25,000 2 50,000
2009 BMW 1200 35,000 4 140,000
2009 Suzuki Dirtbike 10,000 2 20,000 2010 Honda Accord 25,000 1 25,000
2010 Honda Odyssey 35,000 1 35,000
2011 Chevy Tahoe 56,000 1 56,000
2011 Dodge Charger 56,000 6 336,000
2011 Ford Crown Victoria 56,000 1 56,000 2011 Ford F150 41,000 2 82,000
2012 Chevy Tahoe 56,000 6 336,000
2012 Ford F250 55,000 1 55,000
2013 Chevy Tahoe 56,000 4 224,000
2014 Chevy Tahoe 56,000 1 56,000
2014 Dodge Charger 56,000 4 224,000
2014 Ford Explorer 56,000 6 336,000
2015 BMW 1200 35,000 1 35,000
2015 Dodge Durango 35,000 1 35,000
2015 Ford Explorer 56,000 12 672,000
2016 Ford Explorer 56,000 9 504,000
Total Existing Value 5,648,000$
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 9
Fire Protection Facilities
Table 4.1 displays the service population for fire protection facilities.
Tables 4.2 displays the City’s inventory of existing facilities fire protection facilities.
Table 4.1: Fire Facilities Service Population
Residents Workers1
Service
Population
Existing (2015) 112,100 18,100 124,600
New Development (2015-2035) 15,900 110,200 91,900 Total (2035) 128,000 128,300 216,500
Weighting factor 1.00 0.69
Source: Table 2.1; City of Phoenix, AZ.
Note: Service population w eighting factors based on City of Phoenix service call data w eighted by the relative proportions of residential and nonresidential land use in the City, allow ing the results of this survey to be applied in other areas.
Final
July 21, 2016 10
Table 4.3 displays the City’s planned fire protection facilities. The existing fund balance is subtracted from the total cost of planned facilities to determine the net cost of planned facilities.
Table 4.2: Existing Fire Facilities Land and Building Inventory Inventory Units Unit Cost Value 1
Land (acres)
Station 1 and Admin 1.89 acres 280,000$ 529,200$ Station 2 1.76 acres 280,000 492,800
Station 3 2.30 acres 280,000 644,000
Station 4 3.99 acres 280,000 1,117,200
Station 5 1.45 acres 280,000 406,000
Subtotal 11.39 acres 3,189,200$
Buildings (square feet) 2
Fire Station 1 14,332 Sq. Ft. 347$ 4,972,200$ Administration Building 3,000 Sq. Ft. 687 2,060,000 Shop Maintenance 6,110 Sq. Ft. 134 819,200 Training Building 2,266 Sq. Ft. 132 298,300 Shelter 1,160 Sq. Ft. 11 13,300
Storage / Shop 660 Sq. Ft. 89 59,000 Fire Station 2 10,200 Sq. Ft. 270 2,749,900 Fire Station 3 7,572 Sq. Ft. 284 2,152,800 Fire Station 4 9,500 Sq. Ft. 533 5,067,600 Fire Station 5 - Building 1 (Temp)3 1,400 Sq. Ft. - - Fire Station 5 - Building 2 (Temp)3
1,800 Sq. Ft. - -
Subtotal 18,192,300$
Vehicles and Apparatus (See Appendix Table A.2) 9,608,500$ Total Value of Existing Facilities 30,990,000$
1 Unit costs are replacement values supplied by the City of Murrieta based on insurance valuation.
Sources: 2013-2014 Renew al Questionnaire Application, City of Murietta; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Total cost includes building cost and contents (furnishings and equipment) specific to each building. 3 No value show n for these facilities because they w ill be replaced by planned Station #5.
Final
July 21, 2016 11
Table 4.4 below shows the calculation of the planned facilities standard (planned facility value / growth in service population). Under the planned facilities standard the fee revenue perfectly matches the cost of planned facilities.
Table 4.3: Planned Fire Protection Facilities
Value
New Fire Stations
Training Center 3,061,500$
Fire Station #5 at Vineyard Parkway 6,445,000
Fire Station #6 6,445,000
Subtotal 15,951,500$
New Apparatus
Two (2) Type 1 Engines - $675,000 each 1,350,000$
Type 3 Engine 425,000
Subtotal 1,775,000$
Total Cost - Planned Facilities 17,726,500$
(Less: Existing Fund Balance) (1,025,074)
Net Cost of Planned Facilities 16,701,426$
Sources: Capital Improvement Plan FY 2013-14 to FY 2017-18, City of Murrieta, California; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 4.4: Fire Protection Facilities Planned Facilities Standard Net Value of Planned Facilities 16,701,426$
Service Population Growth (2015 to 2035) 91,900
Cost per Capita 182$
Facility Standard per Resident 182$
Facility Standard per Worker1 126
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.69.
Sources: Tables 4.1 and 4.2; City of Murrieta; Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 12
Table 4.5 below shows the maximum justified impact fees resulting from using the planned facilities standard. The City can charge any fee up to this amount. Note that using the planned facilities methodology recovers the exact amount of planned facilities costs identified in Table 4.3.
Table 4.5: Fire Protection Facilities Fee
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D F = E / 1,000
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee 1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee 1 Sq. Ft.
Residential
Single Family 182$ 3.42 622$ 12$ 634$ Multi-family 182 2.39 435 9 444 Nonresidential
Commercial 126$ 2.39 301$ 6$ 307$ 0.31$ Office 126 3.12 393 8 401 0.40 Industrial 126 1.16 146 3 149 0.15 Sources: Tables 2.2 and 4.4; Willdan Financial Services. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
1 Persons per dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential.
Final
July 21, 2016 13
Appendix Table A.2: Existing Fire Apparatus Inventory
Inventory ID Unit Name Model Year
Replacement
Value
Existing Inventory - Heavy Apparatus
41-001 International/Bean Pumper 1941 $ 500 23-028 Seagraves (Parade Unit) 1923 2,500 84-012 E-One Pumper (E-23 Explorers) 1984 120,000 87-075 Ford F-700 Stake Side Utility (OES) 1987 50,000 88-018 E-One Pumper (E-22) 1988 675,000 01-037 Freightliner/Weststates (B-2) 2001 550,000 01-038 American LaFrance Pumper (E-21) 2001 675,000 03-043 E-One Quint (T-1) 2003 1,200,000 04-047 International (WT-1) 2004 90,000 05-049 E-One Pumper (E-3) 2005 675,000 05-050 E-One Pumper (E-4) 2005 675,000
05-051 International/E-1 (B-5) 2005 425,000 08-063 Pierce Pumper (E-2) 2006 675,000 07-059 International/Peirce (B-3) 2007 425,000 07-058 E-One Pumper (E-5) 2007 675,000 08-069 International/Rosenbauer OES 8634 2007 425,000 15-078 Pierce Quint Ladder Truck 2015 1,200,000 Subtotal $ 8,538,000
Existing Inventory - Light Duty Vehicles
97-035 Ford Expedition 4X4 (SWAT) 1997 $ 65,000 98-034 Chevy 4X4 P/U ( TRU Tow Vehicle) 1998 35,000 98-036 Dodge 4X4 P/U (DC-6301) 1998 38,000 01-039 Ford Taurus 2001 35,000 01-040 Ford Crown Victoria 2001 35,000 03-044 Ford F-150 P/U (Training) 2003 40,000 02-042 Ford F-150 4X4 P/U (Disaster-1) 2003 43,000 04-045 Ford F-150 P/U (Prevention 2) 2004 40,000 04-046 Ford F-150 P/U (EMS-1 ) 2004 40,000 04-048 Chevrolet 2500 4X4 P/U (Batt-6305) 2004 65,000 06-052 Ford F-350 (Repair-1) 2006 85,000 07-054 Chevy Avalanche 2007 40,000 07-055 Chevy Tahoe 2007 65,000 08-060 Ford F-350 (LA/1 Tow Vehicle) 2008 37,000 08-061 Ford F-250 (Batt-6306) 2008 65,000 08-062 Chevy Suburban (Batt-6307) 2008 65,000 14-073 Polaris Ranger XP (Ranger 5) 2014 15,000 15-076 Ford F-250 4X4 (Batt- 6305) 2015 65,000 15-077 Ford F-250 4X4 (DFC-6301) 2015 65,000 Subtotal $ 938,000
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 14
Streets, Minor Bridges and Culverts Impact Fee
Table 5.1 calculates the trip rate adjustment factors used to estimate trip demand and allocate fee responsibility. This table will also be used in the traffic signals fee.
Appendix Table A.2: Existing Fire Apparatus Inventory Continued Inventory ID Unit Name Model Year
Replacement
Value
Existing Inventory - Trailers
02-041 Wells 2 Axel Trailer (TRU-1) 2002 $ 9,500 07-053 Az-Tex 2 Axel Trailer (Explorers) 2007 9,500 07-056 Wells 2 axel Trailer (Cert-3) 2007 9,500 07-057 Scott/Liberty Light Air (LA/1) 2007 40,000 08-072 Wells 2 axel trailer (Cert-1) 2008 9,500 08-066 Wells 2 axel trailer (Cert-2) 2008 9,500 08-068 Wells 2 axel trailer (Cert-4) 2008 9,500 10-067 Wells 2 axel trailer (Cert-5) 2009 9,500 Polaris Ranger XP trailer 26,000
Subtotal $ 132,500
Total Value - Existing Inventory $ 9,608,500
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 15
Table 5.2 estimates trip demand in 2015 and 2035. The trip demand factor from Table 5.1 is multiplied by estimates of existing and future development from Table 2.1 to determine existing and future demand for traffic facilities. This table will also be used in the traffic signals fee.
Final
July 21, 2016 16
Table 5.3 displays existing and future level of service for the Streets, Minor Bridges & Culverts Impact Fee projects.
Table 5.2: Land Use Scenario and Total Trips
Land Use
Trip
Demand
Factor
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Units /
1,000 SF Trips
Residential
Single Family 10.62 28,100 298,422 6,400 67,968 34,500 366,390 Multi-family 7.38 7,700 56,826 1,800 13,284 9,500 70,110 Subtotal 35,800 355,248 8,200 81,252 44,000 436,500 Nonresidential
Commercial 17.61 5,573 98,145 14,064 247,669 19,637 345,814 Office 13.43 5,868 78,807 22,001 295,475 27,869 374,282 Industrial 1.92 2,536 4,868 (1,037) (1,991) 1,498 2,877 Subtotal 13,977 181,820 35,028 541,153 49,005 722,973 Total 537,068 622,405 1,159,473
46% 54% 100%
Sources: Tables 2.1 and 5.1; Willdan Financial Services 2015 Total - 2035Growth 2015 to 2035
Final
July 21, 2016 17
Table 5.3: Existing and Future Roadway Segment LOS
Allocation
Project Roadway Classification
No. of
Lanes
Existing
V/C
Existing
LOS
Bike
Lane Future
No. of
Lanes
Future
V/C
Future
LOS Bike Lane
To New
Development
ST-07 - A-B Jefferson Avenue Secondary 2 0.86 D Class II Arterial 6 1.01 F Class II 100% ST-07 - C Jefferson Avenue Arterial 3 0.86 D Class II Arterial 6 1.01 F Class II 100% ST-07 - D Jefferson Avenue Arterial 2 0.77 C - Arterial 6 0.73 C Class II 100% ST-08 - A Jefferson Avenue Arterial 2 0.22 A Class II Arterial 6 0.40 A Class II 100% ST-08 - B-C Jefferson Avenue Arterial 2 0.22 A - Arterial 6 0.50 A Class II 100% ST-14 - C Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Multi-Modal TC 4 1.11 F - Arterial 6 1.23 F Class II 100% ST-15 - B Washington Avenue --- 4 0.38 A - Secondary 4 0.36 A Class II 100% ST-15 - D Washington Avenue --- 3 0.49 A Class II Secondary 4 0.48 A Class II 100% ST-15 - E Washington Avenue --- 3 0.49 A Class II Secondary 4 0.48 A Class II 100% ST-15 - G Washington Avenue --- 4 0.55 A - Secondary 4 0.56 A Class II 100% ST-15 - L Washington Avenue --- - - - - Collector 2 0.11 A MP Trail 54% ST-16 - A Washington Avenue Industrial Collector 2 0.05 A - Industrial Collector 2 0.25 A MP Trail 100% ST-16 - B Washington Avenue Industrial Collector - - - - Industrial Collector 2 0.10 A MP Trail 100% ST 17/18 - A Guava Street --- 2 0.02 A - Major 4 0.46 A Class II 100% ST 17/18 - E Guava Street --- 2 0.09 A - Collector 2 0.49 A Class II 100% ST-19 - A- B Adams Avenue 2 0.18 A - Secondary 4 0.13 A - 100% ST-20 - A Ivy Street Major 2 0.73 C - Major 4 0.41 A Class II 54% ST-20 - B Ivy Street 2 0.33 A - Major 4 0.26 A Class II 100% ST-26 - A Kalmia Street Collector 2 1.18 F - Collector 2 0.63 B Class II / MP Trail 100% ST-27/28 - A Kalmia Street Major 3 0.99 E - Arterial 6 0.91 E Class II 100% ST-27/28 - B Kalmia Street Major 3 1.26 F - Major 4 0.83 D Class II 54% ST-29 - A Lemon Street Secondary 2 0.32 A - Secondary 4 0.16 A Class II 100% ST-30 - A Nutmeg Street Secondary 2 0.44 A - Secondary 4 0.77 C Class II 100% ST-31 - A-B Nutmeg Street Secondary 2 0.45 A - Secondary 4 0.49 A Class II 100% Source: Kimley Horn and Associates.
Existing Conditions (2013) Future Conditions (2035)
Final
July 21, 2016 18
Table 5.3: Existing and Future Roadway Segment LOS (Continued) Allocation
Project Roadway
Existing
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Existing
V/C
Existing
LOS
Bike
Lane
Future
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Future
V/C
Future
LOS Bike Lane
To New
Development
ST-33 - B Monroe Avenue Major - - - - Major 4 0.67 B Class II 100% ST-35 - A Jackson Avenue Collector 3 0.51 A - Secondary 4 0.39 A Class II 100% ST-36 - A Whitewood Road Major - - - - Major 4 0.62 B MP Trail 100% ST-40/41 - A McElwain Road Secondary 2 - Secondary 4 - - Class II 54% ST-40/41 - B McElwain Road Secondary 3 - Secondary 4 0.77 C Class II 54% ST-42 - A Linnel Lane Secondary 2 - Secondary 4 0.93 E Class II 54% ST-42 - B Lee Lane Secondary - - - - Secondary 4 0.57 A - 100% ST-46 - B Whitewood Road Major 3 0.24 A Class II Major 4 0.79 C MP Trail 100% ST-46/47 - A New Antelope Road --- - - - - Major 4 1.06 F Class II 100% ST-48 - A Baxter Road --- - - - - Secondary 4 0.01 A MP Trail 100% ST-49 - A I-215 & Keller Road Interchange --- - - - - Interchange - - - - 54% ST-50 - A Elm Street Major 2 0.19 A - Major 4 0.53 A Class II 100% ST-51 - A Madison Avenue Major 2 0.26 A - Major 4 0.11 A Class II 100% ST-51 - B Madison Avenue --- - - - - 0.14 A Class II 100% ST-51 - C Madison Avenue Major 2 0.26 A - 0.53 A Class II 54% ST-52 - A Monroe Avenue --- - - - - Major 4 0.06 A Class II 100% ST-54 - A Murrieta Hot Springs Road Arterial 4 0.59 A - Urban Arterial 6 0.86 D Class II 100% ST-55 - A Murrieta Hot Springs Road --- - - - - Arterial 6 0.09 A Class II 100% ST-56 - A Date Street --- - - - - Major 4 0.58 A Class II 100% ST-57 - A Hayes Avenue Collector 2 0.05 A - Collector 2 0.59 A MP Trail 100% ST-58 - A Douglas Avenue Collector 2 0.1 A - Collector 2 0.22 A - 100% ST-59 - A Fig Street --- - - - - Industrial Collector 2 0.34 A - 100% ST-60 - A Larchmont Lane --- - - - - Industrial Collector 2 0.50 A - 100% Source: Kimley Horn and Associates.
Existing Conditions (2013) Future Conditions (2035)
Final
July 21, 2016 19
Table 5.3: Existing and Future Roadway Segment LOS (Continued) Allocation
Project Roadway
Existing
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Existing
V/C
Existing
LOS
Bike
Lane
Future
Classification
No. of
Lanes
Future
V/C
Future
LOS Bike Lane
To New
Development
ST-61 - A Clinton Keith Road --- - - - - Arterial 6 1.11 F MP Trail 100% ST-62 - A SR 79 Expressway 4 0.55 A Class II Expressway 6 0.31 A Class II 100% ST-62 - B SR 79 Expressway 4 0.55 A Class II Expressway 6 1.15 F Class II 100% ST-64 - A Porth Road --- - - - - Collector 2 - 54%
ST-65 - A Liberty Road --- - - - - Collector 2 0.30 A - 100% ST-66 - A Antelope Industrial Collector 2 - Industrial Collector 2 0.41 A - 54% ST-67 - A Keller Road Arterial 3 Class II Arterial 6 0.79 C Class II, MP Trail 54% ST-68 - A Mitchell Road --- - - - - Secondary 4 0.47 A - 100% ST-69 - A Gateway Road --- - - - - Collector 2 0.40 A - 100% ST-70 - A Adams Avenue Collector 2 0.52 A Class II Collector 2 1.01 F Class II 100% ST-71 - A Hawthorne --- - - - - Collector 2 0.12 A Class II 100% ST-72 - A Ivy Street Collector 2 0.58 A Class II Collector 2 0.06 A Class II 100% ST-73 - A Adams Avenue Collector 2 0.15 A - Secondary 4 0.45 A Class II 100% ST-74 - A Elm Street Secondary 2 0.19 A - Secondary 4 0.04 A - 100% ST-75 - A Lemon Street Secondary 2 0.52 A - Secondary 4 0.47 A Class II 100% ST-76 - A Vista Murrieta --- - - - - Collector 2 0.12 A - 100% ST-78 - A Fig Street Industrial Collector 2 0.19 A - Industrial Collector 2 0.06 A - 100% ST-80 - A Elm Street Major 2 0.3 A - Major 4 0.08 A Class II 100% ST-81 - A Los Alamos Collector 2 0.36 A - Collector 2 0.28 A Class II 100% ST-82 - A Lincoln Collector 2 0.3 A - Collector 2 0.22 A Class III 100% Source: Kimley Horn and Associates.
Existing Conditions (2013) Future Conditions (2035)
Final
July 21, 2016 20
Table 5.4 displays the cost estimates of the projects included in the Streets, Minor Bridges & Culverts Impact Fee.
Table 5.4: Roadway Segment Facilities Costs
Project Roadway Description Lane Feet Total Cost
Allocation To
New
Development
Cost
Allocated To
New
Development
ST-07 - A-B Jefferson Avenue
Widen 2200 LF on the west side Lemon to N/O
Kalmia (A). Widen 1000 LF on the east side N/O
Kalmia to Centerpointe (B). Construct additional
23 LF, 4 lane span bridge to cross canal at
$575,000.
2,200 $ 5,063,701 100% $ 5,063,701
ST-07 - C1 Jefferson Avenue Widen 350 LF on the east side Kalmia to canal 350 787,500 100% 787,500 ST-07 - D Jefferson Avenue Widen 1700 LF on the east side Lemon to S/O Lily. 1,700 3,838,445 100% 3,838,445 ST-08 - A Jefferson Avenue Widen 900 LF on the east side Gateway to City Limits 900 2,190,047 100% 2,190,047 ST-08 - B-C Jefferson Avenue Widen 500 LF on the eas side S/O Gateway (B) and 1100 LF on the west side S/O Gateway (C). 1,100 2,676,724 100% 2,676,724 ST-14 - C1 Murrieta Hot Springs RdWiden 5300 LF on the south side Margartia Rd to Winchester 5,300 10,000,000 100% 10,000,000 ST-15 - B Washington Avenue Widen 1000 LF on the east side Nutmeg to S/O N. City Limit. Add two bike lanes and a sidewalk. 1,000 1,206,328 100% 1,206,328 ST-15 - D Washington Avenue Widen 800 LF on the east side Lemon to Davenport (D). 800 1,048,648 100% 1,048,648 ST-15 - E Washington Avenue Widen 1700 LF on the east side Fullerton to Magnolia 1,700 2,228,378 100% 2,228,378 ST-15 - G Washington Avenue Widen 700 LF on the east side S/O Calle de Oso Oro. Add two bike lanes and a sidewalk. 700 844,430 100% 844,430 ST-15 - L Washington Avenue Reconstruct a new 2 lane collector. 2,620 4,945,128 54% 2,670,369 Notes:
1 Cost estimated by the City of Murrieta. Contingencies w ere added to the initial estimates.
Sources: City of Murrieta; Kimley Horn and Associates.
-Streetlight and dry utility costs are included in cost/LF. Streetlights are estimated at one streetlight every 250' at $16,000 each, dry utilities are estimated as $40,000 every 2500'. -The costs for a one lane bridge span is estimated at $6,250/LF.
Final
July 21, 2016 21
Table 5.4: Roadway Segment Facilities Costs Continued
Project Roadway Description Lane Feet Total Cost
Allocation To
New
Development
Cost
Allocated To
New
Development
ST-16 - A Washington Avenue Construct between Elm and Guava at 5280 LF 5,280 $ 9,842,444 100% $ 9,842,444 ST-16 - B Washington Avenue Construct 3900 LF S. City Limit to Elm 3,900 9,062,693 100% 9,062,693 ST 17/18 - A Guava Street 1320 LF widening on north side and 820 LF widening on south side Jefferson to Monroe 2,280 4,757,748 100% 4,757,748 ST 17/18 - E Guava Street Widen 5400 LF Washington to W/O John Wayne 5,400 8,516,159 100% 8,516,159 ST-19 - A- B Adams Avenue
Widen 1300 LF on the west side Brown to Guava
(A) and widen 2800 LF on the east side Guava to
Hawthorn (B).
2,800 6,078,134 100% 6,078,134
ST-20 - A1 Ivy Street Widen 1320 LF on the north side Jefferson to Adams 1,320 1,480,000 54% 799,200 ST-20 - B1 Ivy Street Widen 1320 LF on the north side Adams to Washington 1,320 1,480,000 100% 1,480,000 ST-26 - A Kalmia Street Widen/Construct 2640 LF W. City Limits to Washington 2,640 4,491,224 100% 4,491,224 ST-27/28 - A1 Kalmia Street
Widen 690 LF on the north side Village Walk to
Jefferson which includes narrowing travel lanes,
relocating the median, and constructing a through
lane and SW.
690 1,352,500 100% 1,352,500
ST-27/28 - B Kalmia Street Widen 2200 LF on the northside W/O Jefferson to Washington 2,200 3,767,350 54% 2,034,369 ST-29 - A Lemon Street Widen 2000 LF on the north side of Washington to E/O Hayes. 2,000 3,440,458 100% 3,440,458 ST-30 - A Nutmeg Street
Widen appx 480 LF along bridge on Calle de Oso
Oro. Construct additional two lane span bridge at
$6M.
480 6,825,710 100% 6,825,710
ST-31 - A-B Nutmeg Street
Widen 1700 LF on the south side Washington to
Adams (A) and widen 700 LF on the north side
W/O Adams to Washington (B).
1,700 2,924,389 100% 2,924,389
Notes:
1 Cost estimated by the City of Murrieta. Contingencies w ere added to the initial estimates.
Sources: City of Murrieta; Kimley Horn and Associates.
-Streetlight and dry utility costs are included in cost/LF. Streetlights are estimated at one streetlight every 250' at $16,000 each, dry utilities are estimated as $40,000 every 2500'. -The costs for a one lane bridge span is estimated at $6,250/LF.
Final
July 21, 2016 22
Table 5.4: Roadway Segment Facilities Costs Continued
Project Roadway Description Lane Feet Total Cost
Allocation To
New
Development
Cost
Allocated To
New
Development
ST-33 - B Monroe Avenue Construct 3800 LF Los Almos to Murrieta Hot Springs. 3,800 $ 9,518,640 100% $ 9,518,640 ST-35 - A Jackson Avenue Widen 1300 LF on the east side Nutmeg St to S/O Robards 1,300 1,704,053 100% 1,704,053 ST-36 - A Whitewood Road Construct 4600 LF Jackson to Murrieta Hot Springs 4,600 8,733,923 100% 8,733,923 ST-40/41 - A McElwain Road Widen/Construct 3000 LF Linnel Ln to N. City Limit 3,000 6,241,967 54% 3,370,662 ST-40/41 - B McElwain Road Construct 650 LF S/O Linnel Ln on west side 650 852,027 54% 460,094 ST-42 - A Linnel Lane Widen 1100 LF on the north side W/O I-215 1,100 1,892,252 54% 1,021,816 ST-42 - B Lee Lane Construct 2640 LF of new roadway on the north side Menifee to Whitewood 2,640 5,730,812 100% 5,730,812 ST-46 - B Whitewood Road Widen 4800 LF on the east side Hunter to Clinton Keith 4,800 2,500,000 100% 2,500,000 ST-46/47 - A New Antelope Road
Construct appx 16000 LF of New Antelope Rd
Clinton Keith to Scott. Construct new signal at
Clinton Keith (Intersection #21).
16,000 40,078,485 100% 40,078,485
ST-48 - A Baxter Road Widen/Construct 2600 LF on the south side Whitewood to Menifee (E. City Limit) 2,600 6,512,754 100% 6,512,754 ST-49 - A I-215 & Keller Road InterchangeConstruct interchange - 25,000,000 54% 13,500,000 ST-50 - A Elm Street Jefferson Avenue to Monroe Avenue 2,100 4,382,136 100% 4,382,136 Notes:
1 Cost estimated by the City of Murrieta. Contingencies w ere added to the initial estimates.
Sources: City of Murrieta; Kimley Horn and Associates.
-Streetlight and dry utility costs are included in cost/LF. Streetlights are estimated at one streetlight every 250' at $16,000 each, dry utilities are estimated as $40,000 every 2500'. -The costs for a one lane bridge span is estimated at $6,250/LF.
Final
July 21, 2016 23
Table 5.4: Roadway Segment Facilities Costs Continued
Project Roadway Description Lane Feet Total Cost
Allocation To
New
Development
Cost
Allocated To
New
Development
ST-51 - A Madison Avenue Nick Ln to Date St 1,290 $ 2,691,884 100% $ 2,691,884 ST-51 - B Madison Avenue Golden Gate Cir to Nick Ln 700 1,753,434 100% 1,753,434 ST-51 - C Madison Avenue Murrieta Hot Springs Rd to Golden Gate Cir 5,830 14,603,598 54% 7,885,943 ST-52 - A Monroe Avenue Guava St to Larchmont 4,000 10,019,621 100% 10,019,621 ST-54 - A Murrieta Hot Springs RoadMadison Ave to Jefferson Ave 1,320 1,823,821 100% 1,823,821 ST-55 - A Murrieta Hot Springs RoadJefferson Ave to Adams Ave 1,320 3,974,032 100% 3,974,032 ST-56 - A Date Street Winchester Creek Rd to Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 1,320 3,306,475 100% 3,306,475 ST-57 - A Hayes Avenue Kalmia St to Guava St 8,000 12,616,531 100% 12,616,531 ST-58 - A Douglas Avenue Guava St to Elm St 5,280 8,326,911 100% 8,326,911 ST-59 - A Fig Street Jefferson Ave to Monroe Avenue 2,400 5,577,042 100% 5,577,042 ST-60 - A Larchmont Lane Jefferson Ave to Monroe 2,100 4,879,911 100% 4,879,911 ST-61 - A Clinton Keith Road Whitewood Rd to Arendt Ln along Regency frontage 1,320 5,227,000 100% 5,227,000 ST-62 - A SR 79 Max Gillis Blvd to Benton Rd 2,900 1,575,921 100% 1,575,921 ST-62 - B SR 79 Benton Rd to Briggs Rd 900 489,079 100% 489,079 ST-64 - A Porth Road Liberty Rd to Clinton Keith 2,700 5,096,124 54% 2,751,907 ST-65 - A Liberty Road Porth Rd to City Limit 1,320 2,491,438 100% 2,491,438 ST-66 - A Antelope Stepp Rd to Brians Way 7,000 11,039,465 54% 5,961,311 ST-67 - A Keller Road I-215 to Menifee Rd 1,700 2,943,517 54% 1,589,499 ST-68 - A Mitchell Road McElwain to Clinton Keith 2,300 4,992,753 100% 4,992,753 ST-69 - A Gateway Road Jefferson to City Limit 650 1,226,845 100% 1,226,845 ST-70 - A Adams Avenue Lemon to Kalmia 2,640 4,163,455 100% 4,163,455 ST-71 - A Hawthorne Adams to Washington 1,320 2,491,438 100% 2,491,438 ST-72 - A Ivy Street Washington to Hayes 1,900 2,996,426 100% 2,996,426 ST-73 - A Adams Avenue Guava St to Cherry 9,300 10,000,000 100% 10,000,000 ST-74 - A Elm Street Washington to Douglas 1,320 2,270,702 100% 2,270,702 ST-75 - A Lemon Street Washington to Jefferson 2,640 4,541,405 100% 4,541,405 ST-76 - A Vista Murrieta Los Alamos to Monroe 2,900 5,473,615 100% 5,473,615 ST-78 - A Fig Street Adams to Jefferson 700 1,304,870 100% 1,304,870 ST-80 - A Elm Street Adams to Jefferson 1,300 2,712,751 100% 2,712,751 ST-81 - A Los Alamos Via Santee to Ruth Ellen 900 1,419,360 100% 1,419,360 ST-82 - A Lincoln Juniper to Los Alamos 1,000 1,577,066 100% 1,577,066 Total $ 355,601,677 $319,785,420
Notes:
1 Cost estimated by the City of Murrieta. Contingencies w ere added to the initial estimates.
Sources: City of Murrieta; Kimley Horn and Associates.
Streetlight and dry utility costs are included in cost/LF. Streetlights are estimated at one streetlight every 250' at $16,000 each, dry utilities are estimated as $40,000 every 2500'.
The costs for a one lane bridge span is estimated at $6,250/LF.
Final
July 21, 2016 24
In Table 5.5 the net cost of the planned facilities allocated to new development is divided by the growth in trips to determine the cost per trip.
Table 5.6 multiplies the cost per trip from Table 5.5 by the trip demand factors in Table 5.1 to calculate a fee per land use.
Table 5.5: Cost per Trip to Accommodate Growth
Project Costs
Fee Program Share of Planned Facilities Costs 319,785,420$ Less Existing Fund Balance (4,749,774)
Net Costs 315,035,646$
Growth in Daily Trips 622,405
Cost per Trip 506$
Sources: Tables 5.2 and 5.4; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 5.6: Streets, Minor Bridges & Culverts Impact Fee A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D E / 1,000
Trip
Land Use
Cost Per
Trip
Demand
Factor Base Fee 1
Admin
Charge1, 2 Total Fee 1
Fee per
Sq. Ft.
Residential
Single Family 506$ 10.62 5,374$ 107$ 5,481$ Multi-family 506 7.38 3,734 75 3,809 Nonresidential
Commercial 506$ 17.61 8,911$ 178$ 9,089$ 9.09$ Office 506 13.43 6,796 136 6,932 6.93 Industrial 506 1.92 972 19 991 0.99 Sources: Tables 5.1 and 5.5; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Persons per dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Final
July 21, 2016 25
Traffic Signal Fee
Table 6.1 displays the level of service (LOS) data for the projects included in the traffic signal fee.
Final
July 21, 2016 26
Table 6.1: Traffic Signal and Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Allocation
to
GP Int
No. Intersections Control
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Contro
l
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
New
Development
9 New Antelope Rd / Baxter Rd Signal - - - - 25.2 C 89.2 F Signal - - - - 100% 14 New Antelope Rd / Linnel Lane TWSC - - - - 22.1 C 28.5 C Signal 21.4 C 23.4 C 100% 15 Whitewood Rd / Linnel Lane Signal - - - - 26.0 C 43.7 D Signal 24.6 C 38.7 D 100% 21 Clinton Keith Rd / New Antelope Rd TWSC - - - - 5.1 A 4.5 A Signal - - - - 100% 22 Whitewood Rd / Clinton Keith Rd Signal 10.5 B 13.4 B 145.9 F 121.7 F Signal - - - - 100% 25 Winchester Rd (SR-79) / Clinton Keith Rd Signal 14.4 B 21.2 C 38.8 D 53.7 D Signal - - - - 100% 27 Monroe Ave / Los Alamos Rd Signal 15 B 12.4 B 24.5 C 27.5 C Signal - - - - 100% 28 Jefferson Ave / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Signal 21.2 C 20.7 C 133.3 F 206.4 F Signal 56.1 E 115.8 F 100% 29 Madison Ave / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Signal 25.3 C 34.2 C 26.6 C 129.6 F Signal 23.5 C 51.1 D 100% 31 I-15 NB Off Ramp / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Signal 11.8 B 15.3 B 5.7 A 7.9 A Ramp - - - - 54% 36 French Valley - Date St / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd DNE DNE DNE DNE DNE 12.9 B 18.4 B Signal - - - - 100% 37 Jefferson Ave / Guava St Signal 2 A 1.4 A 9.4 A 7.9 A Signal - - - - 100% 39 Washington Ave / Calle Del Oso Oro - Nutmeg St Signal 29.2 C 26.8 C 27.6 C 27.5 C Signal - - - - 100% 41 Jefferson Ave / Nutmeg St Signal 13.2 B 12.9 B 51.1 D 36.0 D Signal - - - - 100% 42 Jefferson Ave / Magnolia St AWSC 18.2 C 21.2 C 10.7 B 9.4 A Signal - - - - 54% 43 Jefferson Ave / Lemon St Signal 10.9 B 6.6 A 28.2 C 18.3 B Signal - - - - 100% 44 Jefferson Ave / Kalmia St Signal 26.2 C 26.7 C 59.3 E 159.9 F Signal 60.3 E 158.5 F 100% 49 Monroe Ave / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd TWSC 15.8 C 23.8 C 8.0 A 16.2 B Signal - - - - 54% 57 Whitewood Rd / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd Signal 12.6 B 9.7 A 28.3 C 88.7 F Signal 28.4 C 51.6 D 100% 58 Adams Ave / Guava St AWSC 8.6 A 9.3 A 12.2 B 143.0 B Signal - - - - 100% 60 Linnel Rd Ext (Mitchell Rd) / Clinton Keith Rd Signal 14.5 B 5.8 A 20.4 C 120.7 F Signal 18.7 B 29.6 C 100% Washington Ave / Lemon St Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Jackson Ave / Nutmeg St Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Adams St / Kalmia St Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Adams St / Ivy St AWSC - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Jefferson Ave / Elm St Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Hayes Ave / De Luz Rd - Guava St TWSC - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Madison Ave / Elm St AWSC - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Clinton Keith Rd / McElwain Rd Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Linnel Ln / McElwain Rd AWSC - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Jefferson Ave / Fig St Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Madison Ave / Fig St AWSC - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Jefferson Ave / Centerpointe Ct Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Washington Ave / Fullerton Rd Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Villagewalk / Centerpointe Ct Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Villagewalk / Kalmia Rd Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% Murrieta Hot Springs Rd / Via Princessa E Signal - - - - - - - - Signal - - - - 54% DNE - Indicates intersections that do not exist.
Source: Kimley Horn and Associates.
Existing Conditions 2035 No Improvement 2035 + Recommended Improvement AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Final
July 21, 2016 27
Table 6.2 displays the cost estimates for the traffic signal improvement projects.
Table 6.2: Traffic Signal and Intersection - Improvement Costs GP Int
No. Intersection
Estimated
Construction
Costs
Project
Specifications
and
Engineering
(PS+E) for
Design (15%)
Traffic
Control (5%)
Stormwater
Management
(5%)
Contingencies
(15%) Grand Total
Allocation to
New
Development
Total Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
9 New Antelope Rd / Baxter Rd 2,756,250$ 413,438$ 137,813$ 137,813$ 413,438$ 3,858,750$ 100% 3,858,750$ 14 New Antelope Rd / Linnel Lane 3,612,500 541,875 180,625 180,625 541,875 5,057,500 100% 5,057,500 15 Whitewood Rd / Linnel Lane 1,622,750 243,413 81,138 81,138 243,413 2,271,850 100% 2,271,850 21 Clinton Keith Rd / New Antelope Rd 1,556,250 233,438 77,813 77,813 233,438 2,178,750 100% 2,178,750 22 Whitewood Rd / Clinton Keith Rd 2,620,250 393,038 131,013 131,013 393,038 3,668,350 100% 3,668,350 25 Winchester Rd (SR-79) / Clinton Keith Rd 3,215,000 482,250 160,750 160,750 482,250 4,501,000 100% 4,501,000 27 Monroe Ave / Los Alamos Rd 1,456,250 218,438 72,813 72,813 218,438 2,038,750 100% 2,038,750 28 Jefferson Ave / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 3,309,250 496,388 165,463 165,463 496,388 4,632,950 100% 4,632,950 29 Madison Ave / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 250,000 37,500 12,500 12,500 37,500 350,000 100% 350,000 31 I-15 NB Off Ramp / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 2,000,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 2,800,000 54% 1,512,000 36 French Valley - Date St / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 1,556,250 233,438 77,813 77,813 233,438 2,178,750 100% 2,178,750 37 Jefferson Ave / Guava St 500,000 75,000 25,000 25,000 75,000 700,000 100% 700,000 39 Washington Ave / Calle Del Oso Oro - Nutmeg St 750,000 112,500 37,500 37,500 112,500 1,050,000 100% 1,050,000 41 Jefferson Ave / Nutmeg St 901,000 135,150 45,050 45,050 135,150 1,261,400 100% 1,261,400 42 Jefferson Ave / Magnolia St 1,601,000 240,150 80,050 80,050 240,150 2,241,400 54% 1,210,356 43 Jefferson Ave / Lemon St 1,088,500 163,275 54,425 54,425 163,275 1,523,900 100% 1,523,900 44 Jefferson Ave / Kalmia St 750,000 112,500 37,500 37,500 112,500 1,050,000 100% 1,050,000 49 Monroe Ave / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 2,058,000 308,700 102,900 102,900 308,700 2,881,200 54% 1,555,848 57 Whitewood Rd / Murrieta Hot Springs Rd 751,750 112,763 37,588 37,588 112,763 1,052,450 100% 1,052,450 58 Adams Ave / Guava St 1,170,000 175,500 58,500 58,500 175,500 1,638,000 100% 1,638,000 60 Linnel Rd Ext (Mitchell Rd) / Clinton Keith Rd 1,622,750 243,413 81,138 81,138 243,413 2,271,850 100% 2,271,850 Washington Ave / Lemon St 1,000,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 1,400,000 54% 756,000 Jackson Ave / Nutmeg St 500,000 75,000 25,000 25,000 75,000 700,000 54% 378,000 Adams St / Kalmia St 750,000 112,500 37,500 37,500 112,500 1,050,000 54% 567,000 Notes: All costs in current 2013 dollars.
Cost Assumptions:
Left Hand Turn Lane: $350,000
Right Hand Turn Lane: $250,000
New Signal: $350,000
Signal Modification (e.g., adding a phase) : $250,000
Source: Kimley Horn Associates.
Final
July 21, 2016 28
Table 6.2: Traffic Signal and Intersection - Improvement Costs Continued GP Int
No. Intersection
Estimated
Construction
Costs
Project
Specifications
and
Engineering
(PS+E) for
Design (15%)
Traffic
Control (5%)
Stormwater
Management
(5%)
Contingencies
(15%) Grand Total
Allocation to
New
Development
Total Cost
Allocated to
New
Development
Adams St / Ivy St 750,000$ 112,500$ 37,500$ 37,500$ 112,500$ 1,050,000$ 54% 567,000$ Jefferson Ave / Elm St 1,100,000 165,000 55,000 55,000 165,000 1,540,000 54% 831,600 Hayes Ave / De Luz Rd - Guava St 1,472,750 220,913 73,638 73,638 220,913 2,061,850 54% 1,113,399 Madison Ave / Elm St 2,357,000 353,550 117,850 117,850 353,550 3,299,800 54% 1,781,892 Clinton Keith Rd / McElwain Rd 1,260,000 189,000 63,000 63,000 189,000 1,764,000 54% 952,560 Linnel Ln / McElwain Rd 2,132,750 319,913 106,638 106,638 319,913 2,985,850 54% 1,612,359 Jefferson Ave / Fig St 1,161,000 174,150 58,050 58,050 174,150 1,625,400 54% 877,716 Madison Ave / Fig St 2,594,000 389,100 129,700 129,700 389,100 3,631,600 54% 1,961,064 Jefferson Ave / Centerpointe Ct 701,750 105,263 35,088 35,088 105,263 982,450 54% 530,523 Washington Ave / Fullerton Rd 811,000 121,650 40,550 40,550 121,650 1,135,400 54% 613,116 Villagewalk / Centerpointe Ct 998,500 149,775 49,925 49,925 149,775 1,397,900 54% 754,866 Villagewalk / Kalmia Rd 998,500 149,775 49,925 49,925 149,775 1,397,900 54% 754,866 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd / Via Princessa E 901,000 135,150 45,050 45,050 135,150 1,261,400 54% 681,156 Total 54,636,000$ 8,195,400$ 2,731,800$ 2,731,800$ 8,195,400$ 76,490,400$ 60,295,571$ Notes: All costs in current 2013 dollars.
Cost Assumptions:
Left Hand Turn Lane: $350,000
Right Hand Turn Lane: $250,000
New Signal: $350,000
Signal Modification (e.g., adding a phase) : $250,000
Source: Kimley Horn Associates.
Final
July 21, 2016 29
In Table 6.3 the net cost of the planned facilities allocated to new development is divided by the growth in trips to determine the cost per trip.
Table 6.4 multiplies the cost per trip from Table 6.3 by the trip demand factors in Table 5.1 to calculate a fee per land use.
Table 6.3: Cost per Trip to Accommodate Growth
Fee Program Share of Planned Facilities Costs 60,295,571$ Less Existing Fund Balance (157,854)
Net Costs 60,137,717$
Growth in Daily Trips 622,405
Cost per Trip 97$
Sources: Tables 5.2 and 6.2; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 6.4: Traffic Signals and Controlers Impact Fee
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D E / 1,000
Trip
Land Use
Cost Per
Trip
Demand
Factor Base Fee 1
Admin
Charge1, 2 Total Fee 1
Fee per
Sq. Ft.
Residential
Single Family 97$ 10.62 1,030$ 21$ 1,051$ Multi-family 97 7.38 716 14 730 Nonresidential
Commercial 97$ 17.61 1,708$ 34$ 1,742$ 1.74$ Office 97 13.43 1,303 26 1,329 1.33 Industrial 97 1.92 186 4 190 0.19 Sources: Tables 5.1 and 6.3; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Persons per dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Final
July 21, 2016 30
Storm Drainage Facilities Fee
Table 7.1 calculates the equivalent demand units for the different land uses included in the study.
Table 7.2 estimates storm drain demand in 2015 and 2035. The EDU factor from Table 7.1 is multiplied by estimates of existing and future development from Table 2.1 to determine existing and future demand for storm drain facilities.
Table 7.1: Equivalent Dwelling Units
DU or
KSF per
acre 1
Average
Percent
Impervious
Equivalent
Dwelling
Unit (EDU)2
Residential
Single Family 5.00 40% 1.00
Multi-Family 10.00 73% 0.91
Nonresidential
Commercial 21.78 90% 0.52
Office 41.38 90% 0.27
Industrial 17.42 90% 0.65
1 Dw elling units for residential and thousand building square feet for non-residential.
Density based on estimated development and acreage for each land use type in the General Plan . Nonresidential densities are based on floor-area-ratios of 0.5 for commercial, 0.95 for office, and 0.40 for industrial, derived from the ranges in Table 3-18 of the General Plan Land Use Element.
2 EDUs per dw elling unit for residential development and per thousand square feet for nonresidential development.
Sources: Murrieta General Plan Land Use Element, Table 3-18. Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 31
Table 7.3 displays the costs of storm drain facilities allocated to new development.
Table 7.2: Storm Drain Facilities Equivalent Dwelling Units EDU
Factor1
Existing
(DU/KSF)
Projected
Growth
(DU/KSF)
Total
(DU/KSF)
Existing
EDUs
Growth in
EDUs Total
Existing City
Residential
Single Family 1.00 28,100 6,400 34,500 28,100 6,400 34,500 Multi-Family 0.91 7,700 1,800 9,500 7,007 1,638 8,645 Subtotal 35,800 8,200 44,000 35,107 8,038 43,145 Nonresidential
Commercial 0.52 5,573 14,064 19,637 2,898 7,313 10,211 Office 0.27 5,868 22,001 27,869 1,584 5,940 7,524 Industrial 0.65 2,536 (1,037) 1,498 1,648 (674) 974 Subtotal 13,977 35,028 49,005 6,131 12,579 18,709 Total 41,238 20,617 61,854
Share 66.7% 33.3%
1 Per dw elling unit (residential) or thousand building square feet (nonresidential).
Sources: Table 2.1 and 7.1; Willdan Financial Services
Final
July 21, 2016 32
Project
Number Description Total Cost1
Allocation to
New
Development 2
Costs
Allocated to
New
Development
SD-01 Construct Storm Drainage Line D 6,998,454$ 33.33% 2,332,585$ SD-11 Construct Storm Drainage Line L 2,436,171 33.33% 811,976 SD-12 Construct Storm Drainage Line L-1 201,784 33.33% 67,255 SD-13 Construct Storm Drainage Line M 592,227 33.33% 197,389 SD-14 Construct Storm Drainage Line M-1 319,901 33.33% 106,623 SD-15 Construct Storm Drainage Line N 1,737,310 33.33% 579,045 SD-16 Construct Storm Drainage N/O Larchmont, Jefferson to Murrieta Creek 1,171,331 33.33% 390,404 SD-17 Construct Storm Drainage N/O Fuex Wa, Jefferson to Murrieta Creek 592,227 33.33% 197,389 SD-19 Construct Storm Drainage Line, Kalmia Street, Historic Murrieta Area 185,703 33.33% 61,895 SD-20 Construct Storm Drainage Line, "B" Street, Historic Murrieta area 146,498 33.33% 48,828 SD-21 Construct Storm Drainage Line, Juniper Street, Historic Murrieta area - 33.33% - SD-22 Construct Storm Drainage Line, Jefferson Street, Historic Murrieta area 108,602 33.33% 36,197 SD-23 Construct Storm Drainage Line, Adams Street, Historic Murrieta area 203,424 33.33% 67,801 SD-25 Construct Storm Drainage Line, Ivy Street, Historic Murrieta area - 33.33% - SD-26 Construct Storm Drainage Line, New Clay Street, Historic Murrieta area 188,824 33.33% 62,935 SD-27 Storm Drainage Master Plan 500,000 33.33% 166,650 8059 Guava: Jefferson to Murrieta Creek Road 208,398 33.33% 69,459 8157 Line D and D1‐Madison to Jefferson 30,246 33.33% 10,081 8202 Line E Storm Drain 74,725 33.33% 24,906
8345 Murrieta Creek Design 268,461 33.33% 89,478
10016 Development Impact Fee Nexus Study 4,900 33.33% 1,633 N/A Line F at Murrieta Creek 1,940,000 33.33% 646,602 N/A Construct Line G - Adams to Murrieta Creek 2,000,000 33.33% 666,600 SD-18 Construct Murrieta Creek Flood Control Channel 10,000,000 33.33% 3,333,000 Total 29,909,187$ 9,968,732$
(Less Existing Fund Balances) (3,209,954)$
Net Cost of Planned Facilities (Including Murrieta Creek) 6,758,778$ 2 Allocation is consistent w ith 1998 storm drain impact fee analysis.
Sources: City of Murrieta; Engineering New s Record; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Projects numbers beginning w ith "SD-" have been adjusted for inflation from August 1998 to November 2015, using Engineering New s Record's Building Cost Index, w ith the exception of SD-27.
Table 7.3: Total Cost of Facilities Needed to Serve New Development
Final
July 21, 2016 33
Table 7.4 divides the new planned facility costs by the growth in EDUs to determine a cost per EDU.
Table 7.5 multiples the cost per EDU by the EDU factors in Table 7.1 to determine a fee per dwelling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential space.
Net Cost of Planned Facilities for New Development 3,425,778$ Growth in EDUs 20,617
Cost per EDU 166$
Sources: Tables 7.2 and 7.3; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 7.4: Storm Drain Planned Facility Standard
Table 7.5: Storm Drainage Facilities Impact Fee
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D E / 1,000
Cost Per
EDU
EDU
Factor Base Fee 1
Admin
Charge1, 2 Total Fee 1
Fee per Sq.
Ft.
Residential
Single Family 328$ 1.00 328$ 7$ 334$ Multi-family 328 0.91 298 6 304 Nonresidential
Commercial 328$ 0.52 170$ 3$ 173$ 0.17$ Office 328 0.27 89 2 90 0.09 Industrial 328 0.65 213 4 217 0.22 Sources: Tables 7.1 and 7.4; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Persons per dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Final
July 21, 2016 34
General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment
Table 8.1 displays the existing and future service population for general facilities.
Residents Workers
Service
Population
Existing (2015) 112,100 18,100 117,700
New Development (2015-2035) 15,900 110,200 50,100 Total (2035) 128,000 128,300 167,800
Weighting factor 1.00 0.31
Source: Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 8.1: General Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment
Service Population
Final
July 21, 2016 35
Table 8.2 displays the general facilities inventory.
Table 8.2: General Facilties Inventory
Inventory Unit Cost1 Value
Land (acres)
New City Hall 4.04 280,000$ 1,131,200$
Old City Hall 0.95 280,000 266,000
Los Alamos Hills Office 19.13 280,000 5,356,400 Stretch Form Building 4.31 280,000 1,206,800 Maintenance Yard 6.90 280,000 1,932,000
Subtotal 35.33 9,892,400$
Buildings (square feet)
New City Hall 35,000 285$ 9,975,000$
Old City Hall 13,683 205 2,800,000
Public Works Modular Office 1,440 150 216,000 Shop Bldg 4,284 91 390,000
Storage Shed # 1 640 23 15,000
Storage Shed # 2 640 23 15,000
Equipment Shelter 2,520 36 90,000
Subtotal 58,207 13,501,000$
Vehicles (Appendix Table A.3) 2,007,536$
Equipment (Appendix Table A.4) 7,070,000$
Building Contents
Old City Hall n/a n/a 700,000$
Public Works Modular Office n/a n/a 40,000
Shop Bldg n/a n/a 65,000
Storage Shed # 1 n/a n/a 10,000
Storage Shed # 2 n/a n/a 10,000
Equipment Shelter n/a n/a 25,000
New City Hall n/a n/a 2,000,000
Subtotal - 2,850,000$
Total Value of Existing Facilities 35,320,936$
1 Unit costs are replacement valuations supplied by the City of Murrieta.
Sources: City of Murrieta; Appendix Tables A.1 and A.2, Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 36
Table 8.3 displays the planned general facilities.
Table 8.4 below shows the calculation of the planned facilities standard (planned facility value / growth in service population). Under the planned facilities standard the fee revenue perfectly matches the cost of planned facilities.
Amount Units Unit Cost Total
Public Works Maintenance Building 10,000 Sq. Ft. 285$ 2,850,000$ North Murrieta Technology Corridor Master Plan n/a 150,000 Permitting Software 800,000
Subtotal 3,800,000$
(Less Existing Fund Balance) (356,418)
Net Cost of Planned Facilities 3,443,582$
Table 8.3: Planned Facilities
Sources: Capital Improvement Plan FY 2013-14 to FY 2017-18, City of Murrieta, California; Willdan Financial Services.
Net Value of Planned Facilities 3,443,582$
Service Population Growth (2015 to 2035) 50,100
Cost per Capita 69$
Facility Standard per Resident 69$
Facility Standard per Worker 1 21
1 Based on a w eighing factor of 0.31.
Sources: Tables 8.1, 8.2 and 8.3; City of Murrieta; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 8.4: General Facilities, Vehicles and
Equipment Planned Facilities Standard
Final
July 21, 2016 37
Table 8.5 below shows the maximum justified impact fees resulting from using the planned facilities standard. The City can charge any fee up to this amount. Note that using the planned facilities methodology recovers the exact amount of planned facilities costs identified in Table 8.3.
Table 8.5: General Government Facilities Fee - Planned Facilities Standard A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D E / 1,000
Cost Per Admin Fee per
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee 1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee 1 Sq. Ft.
Residential
Single Family Unit 69$ 3.42 236$ 5$ 241$ Multi-family Unit 69 2.39 165 3 168 Nonresidential
Commercial 21$ 2.39 50$ 1$ 51$ 0.05$ Office 21 3.12 66 1 67 0.07 Industrial 21 1.16 24 0 24 0.02 1 Fee per dw elling unit (residential) or per 1,000 square feet (nonresidential).
Sources: Tables 2.2 and 8.4; Willdan Financial Services 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Final
July 21, 2016 38
Appendix Table A.3: General Government Vehicle Inventory Description Department
Replacement
Value
1999 Crown Victoria CH Pool 35,000$
2000 Ford Explorer 4WD CH Pool 45,000
2001 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2002 Chevrolet 1500 PW 35,000
2002 Ford Diesel Dump Truck PW 95,000
2003 Ford F-150 B&S 35,000
2003 Ford F-150 B&S 35,000
2003 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2003 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2003 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2003 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2003 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2003 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2004 Ford F-150 B&S 35,000
2004 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2004 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2004 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2004 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2005 Chevy1500 Extended Cab PW 35,000
2005 Dodge 1500 Pickup B&S 35,000
2005 Dodge 1500 Pickup B&S 35,000
2005 Dodge 1500 Pickup B&S 35,000
2005 Dodge 2500 PW 40,000
2005 Global Electric Motor CSD 9,287
2005 Global Electric Motor CSD 9,287
2005 Global Electric Motor IS 9,287
2006 Chevrolet Cargo Van CSD 42,600
2006 Chevy Trailblazer B&S 41,075
2006 Ford Ranger CH Pool 26,100
PW = Public Works
CH POOL = City Hall Pool
B&S = Building and Safety
CSD = Community Services District.
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 39
Appendix Table A.3: General Government Vehicle Inventory Description Department
Replacement
Value
2006 Ford Ranger CH Pool 26,100
2006 Ford Ranger CH Pool 26,100
2006 Ford Ranger CH Pool 26,100
2006 Ford Ranger CSD 26,100
2006 Ford Ranger CSD 26,100
2006 Ford Ranger CSD 26,100
2006 Ford Ranger PW 26,100
2006 GMC Sierra PW 35,000
2007 Ford E-350 CSD 50,000
2007 Ford Explorer XLT CSD 44,050
2007 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2007 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2007 Ford F-750 Dump Truck PW 103,000
2008 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2008 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2008 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2008 Ford F-150 CSD 35,000
2008 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2008 Ford F-150 PW 35,000
2009 Ford Escape CSD 37,575
2009 Ford Escape CSD 37,575
2009 Ford F-150 4x2 Supercab CSD 40,000
2009 Ford F-150 4x2 Supercab CSD 40,000
2009 Ford F-750 PW 110,000
Kubota Tractor with loader CSD 30,000
Total Value - General Government Vehicles 2,007,536$
PW = Public Works
CH POOL = City Hall Pool
B&S = Building and Safety
CSD = Community Services District.
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 40
Appendix Table A.4: Equpiment Inventory
Total Cost
Router Enclosure 6,553$
ESRI GIS Software 4,899
Blade Enclosure 53,243
HP SAN/EVA4400 26,821
GEOXT 512 W/ Terrasync Pro 6,368
HP BL20PG2 XEON- Server 18,288
SAN Array 100 13,712
ArcSDE 9.0 Software 10,783
HP Server BLadeProliant BL20 6,552
Precision Workstation 670 5,528
Xplore PC Tablet 5,143
Dell Precision Workstation 670 13,520
NEO 2000 Tabe Backup 11,191
Data Repository 29,582
HP ProLiant DL585 Server 54,802
MSA 1000 SAN Starter Kit 14,038
Xplore PC Tablet 6,574
ArcInfo Software 11,176
HP DeskJet Z6100 42" Plotter 9,805
Production Line Tool Set Soft 5,395
Nexan SATABoy Disk Backup 15,427
Backup Software 7,290
1995 Vibration Roller Trailer 14,169
1995 Extend a Hoe Backhoe 60,746
1995 Motor Grader 122,754
Compressor Trailer 9,000
Thermal Imager 13,389
Audio Log Digital Recorder 911 29,318
Computer Aided Dispatch System 206,741
Dispatch Radio Console Pos. 121,258
Pass Thru Evidence Storage 21,681
Movable Shelving Unit 63,528
Electric Door Access System 48,000
CCTV Surveillance Cam Sys 68,330
Tack Trailer 8,000
Auto Extraction Unit+ 15,000
Layton H500B Paver 22,095
Auto Extraction Power Unit 6,500
18KVA UPS Battery Backup 25,000
2005 Single Axle Trailer 9,765
Forensic Recovery of Evidence Device 6,614
Movable Shelving Unit 11,586
DSM Lockers Pass Thru 21,682
EOC Mobile Command Post 334,751
2005 Backhoe Loader 59,801
Transmit Combiner 11,818
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 41
Appendix Table A.4: Equpiment Inventory (Continued)
Total Cost
Astro-Trac Receiver 22,500$
Astro-Trac Reciever 34,254
Netclock GPS Master Clock 8,457
Channel 2 Repeater 10,000
Spectra-Tac Comprato 30,000
Channel 3 Digitac Comparator 16,556
Channel 1 Quantar Repeater 54,000
Channel 3 Quantar Repeater 34,402
Emergency Generator 3456DITA 97,680
Central Electronics Bank Gold 29,924
Central Electronics CardCages 6,765
Gold Series Windows NT Server 5,204
MDB System Message Switch 5,625
MDB Client 28,350
Automatic Vehicle Location 8,985
Looking Glass Dispatch 20,000
Looking Glass Mobile Map 25,970
Looking Glass Crimes 10,000
Cotton Velour Traveler Curtain 5,841
Multi Media-Digital Scanner 12,221
Forensic Computer 6,149
Tactical Blanket 9,300
Auto Extraction Unit DPU3100 17,000
Auto Extraction Unit Engine 3 17,000
Auto Extraction Unit PPU1202 17,000
Tactical Throw Telephone 10,506
CAD Primary 40,000
Light Air Unit 78,000
Waxie 20" 1500 RPM Burnisher 5,390
Grand Piano 15,000
Video Conference Center 106,928
34 Mobile Data Bases 426,514
Dyna Vac Jet N Vac Pumper 44,995
ADT Alarm System 86,881
Alert AM Satelite Radio 111,621
2008 John Deere 310SJ Loader 84,495
Xplore PC Tablet W ArcPad 6,662
Autopulse Platform Resuscitati 92,217
Autopulse Platform Resuscitati 13,435
Portable Co-Oximeter Masimo 38,758
Hydro Tek Pressur Washer 9,013
Portable Computers 35,265
DUI Checkpoint Trailer 30,000
Tic Evolution 5200 8,297
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 42
Appendix Table A.4: Equpiment Inventory (Continued)
Total Cost
Road Force Trailer 8x16 6,910$
Station 2 Heating & Air Units 16,524
Property & Evidence Shelving 5,175
Dispatch Console #5 5,630
False Alarm Tracking Software 4,849
Falcon's View Park Fencing 23,152
Photo ID Machine/Camera 6,006
Con-Space CSI-2000 Rescue 1 6,419
Uninteruptable Power Supply 24,342
CCTV System-40600 Cal Oaks 13,921
Thermal Imaging Camera 5000 25,860
Fujitsu Scanner 6,331
Universal Fit Test System 10,956
Fire Alarm Sprinkler System 8,375
City Hall Card Access System 9,513
Training Room Epson Projector 5,261
Air Cleaning System Fire Stn 110,449
IP Communications System 871,548
Entry Gate System 8,587
Frequency 858.23750/813.23750 25,000
HP Proliant DL380 Server 17,154
Eagle Pincher Forklift 11,853
Fujitsu M4097D Duplex Scanner 4,854
EVO 500 Thermal Imaging Camera 8,775
CFAB Capital Budget Software 7,500
Xplore Tablet XPL 01-10830 11,067
Panasonic Tuffbook Dual XP 11,974
Fire Station #4 Radio Equip 14,552
Liberty Software 91,590
File Tracking Software 43,737
Fire Station #4 Phone System 13,570
System Expansion Hard Drives 5,926
Media Manager Software 11,881
HP Proliant DL380 - Fire 6,517
Security Gate @ Station 2 29,707
Security Gate @ Station 1 11,307
HP Designjet 820 MFP 19,298
Brake Lathe with Bench 5,398
Pool Cover & Reels 5,142
Closed Circuit TV 37,603
HP Designjet 820 MFP 19,298
TeleStaff Software 12,122
IBM i5 Model 9406-520 CAD 20,144
CAD Software 10,721
Vehicle Exhaust System 9,323
CAD 400 Redundancy 16,971
Smartnet Phone System 16,315
KR Nida Satellite Phone 14,552
Uninteruptable Power System 11,164
Tuffstuff AP4500 4 Station Gym 15,142
3M Detection System Model 8802 23,612
3M RefID Handheld Tracker 6,633
3M Selfcheck System 8410 19,689
3M Selfcheck System 8410 49,473
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 43
Appendix Table A.4: Equpiment Inventory (Continued)
Total Cost
Radar Speed Display Trailer 16,031$
1520 DC Speed Display Unit 12,133
Optical Library System 18,664
HP DL 380G5 Server 9,107
Team Budget Software 8,700
2007 Wells Cargo Road Force 6,620
Commercial Range 9,198
Tile Concrete Spray Turtle 7,524
IBMx3650 Series Server 11,206
TIC Evolution 5200 8,189
DVR for CCTV 10,909
Fujitsu B&W/Color Scanner 6,460
Holmatro PPU15 Personal Power 20,994
Holmatro DPU31 Pump 8,388
Holmatro 4050 NCT Cutter Core 31,918
Holmatro 4242 Spreader 28,979
Holmatro PPU15 Personal Power 5,249
Holmatro 4242 Spreader 5,737
LaserFiche Standard Server Sin 10,042
Fujitsu 5750C VRS Scanner 7,650
16 Channel DVR Flat Panel Moni 8,494
Cisco 2811 ISR Router 6,127
Midland Tech III Base Station 10,364
Midland Base Tech III Repeater 10,364
EZ6 Jeter Mobile System 95,622
Uninteruptable Power Source 95,898
Tangent Voting System 9,676
Voting Software 28,425
Fiber Optic Connect 65,934
Router & Phone System Station5 18,040
Budget Custom Reports Upgrade 5,175
Portable Aquatic Lift 6,997
Learning Express Software 5,379
Laserfiche Advanced Audit 11,982
Team Budget Planning Report 5,400
Wells Cargo 16x8 Road Force 7,224
Video Investigator 4.0 6,934
Heavy Truck Wheel Lift 40,000
Automotive Car/Truck Lift 8,000
Auto Extraction unit 7,500
Electric Auto Extraction Unit 16,700
HP Scanner Plotter 19,298
Wells 2 Axel Trailer 5,578
2007 Az Tex 2 Axel Trailer 6,620
DUI Trailer-Mighty Mover Tralr 11,000
Solar Speed Limit Sign 14,198
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 44
Appendix Table A.4: Equpiment Inventory (Continued)
Total Cost
Fire Supression System 88,985$
Centracom Elite Series Console 20,431
Vision Communication Console 27,187
Electric Hydraulic Expander 7,358
Security Cameras-Labor & Matls 12,968
Ingersoll-Rand Asphalt Compact 29,654
Zieman Carrier-Trailer 5,724
Dispatcher Wall Monitor 4,199
Audiolog, Max-Pro 3000 35,840
Library Automatic Doors 7,621
Audio/Visual Equipment FS# 4 Training 9,483
Traffic Management Audio/Video 79,476
Traffic Mgmt Video Server 11,744
IFAS Financial Software 570,054
Intelligent Return plus Library Sorter 256,701
2010 Wells Cargo RF8162 6,888
Auto Scrubber 5,981
Midland VHF Radio 21,161
Dispatch Console #6 47,454
23952.67 - Police Dept AMLP System 23,953
33142.32 - LP15 - Monitor/Defibrillator/Modem 364,566
Upgrade to GeoBlade Platform 10,332
Tactical Camera System 16,598
Network Storage Equipt 15,210
A/C Unit-City Hall's Video Rm 10,500
Remote surveillance unit 5,400
AC Units - Comm Center 32,180
SWAT handheld Unit 8,845
7,405,176$
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 45
Open Space - EXCLUDED
Park Facilities
Table 10.1 displays the park facilities service population.
Table 10.2 displays the City’s existing inventory of parkland.
Table 10.1: Parks Service Population
Residents
Existing (2015) 112,100
Growth (2015 - 2035) 15,900
Total (2035) 128,000
Source: Table 2.1.
Final
July 21, 2016 46
Table 10.2: Park Land Inventory
Developed
Acreage
Undeveloped
Acreage
Neighborhood Parks
Barratt Park 8.30 -
Firefighters Park 3.21 -
Grizzly Ridge Park 0.50 -
Mapleton Park 9.30 -
Mountain Pride Park 9.64 -
Murrieta Elementary School 4.26 -
Northstar Park 3.08 -
Rancho Acacia Park 10.11 -
Second Avenue Park - 6.10
Shady Maple Park 4.79 -
Valley Vista Park 6.50 -
Vintage Reserve Park 3.83 -
Subtotal 63.52 6.10
Neighborhood Play Areas
Antelope Hills Park - Active 5.31 -
Antigua Park 2.26 -
Blackmore Ranch Park 1.14 -
Calle Cipres Park 1.80 -
Calle Estancia Park 2.83 -
Carson Park 0.69 -
Century Park 3.90 -
Creekside Village Green 4.00 -
Crystal Aire Park 1.11 -
Eastgate Park 1.50 -
Echo Canyon Park 3.07 -
Golden Cities/Alderwood1 8.00
Meadowridge Park 4.29 -
Montafino Park 0.76 -
Monte Vista Park 1.06 -
Oak Terrace Park 0.20 -
Oak Tree Park 0.32 -
Palomar Park 1.75 -
Rosewood Park 0.41 -
Springbrook Park 0.29 -
Sycamore Park 2.66 -
Vineyard Park1 9.30
Whitewood Park 1.84 -
Subtotal 58.49
1 These parks are conditioned to be built by developers. Will be completed in the near future.
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 47
Table 10.3 displays the City’s inventory of special park facilities.
Table 10.2: Park Land Inventory - Continued
Developed
Acreage
Undeveloped
Acreage
Citywide Parks
Los Alamos Hills Sports Park 45.00 40.00 Community Parks
Alta Murrieta Sports Park 9.76 -
California Oaks Sports Park 19.99 -
Copper Canyon Park 20.94 -
Glen Arbor Park 18.92 -
Hunt Park 4.72 -
Mira Mosa Park 8.10 -
Pond Park 14.59 -
Torrey Pines Park 8.00 -
Subtotal 105.02 -
Special Use Parks
Equestrian Park 21.27 -
Sykes Ranch Park 2.61 -
Town Square Park 4.22 -
Subtotal 28.10
Nature Parks
Antelope Hills Park - -
Bear Valley Park 1 20.14 -
Bear Valley Park 2 3.97 -
Cole Canyon Park 140.00 -
Falcon's View Park 14.00 -
Oak Mesa P ark 5.98 -
Warm Springs Park 23.80 -
Subtotal 207.89 -
Total - Existing Parkland 508.02 46.10
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 48
Table 10.4 displays the cost to acquire and develop parkland in Murrieta.
Table 10.3: Existing Park Facility Inventory
Facility Inventory Units Unit Cost Total Cost
California Oaks Sports Park Admin & Life Guards Office 640 Sq. Ft. 203$ 130,000$ Park Restrooms 1,728 Sq. Ft. 174 300,000 Shelter 751 Sq. Ft. 40 30,000 Alta Murrieta Sports Park Restroom / Snack Bar 772 Sq. Ft. 194 150,000 Copper Canyon Park Office / Rec Room 2,128 Sq. Ft. 141 300,000 Pump House 1,054 Sq. Ft. 142 150,000 Restroom 404 Sq. Ft. 173 70,000 Trash Enclosure 180 Sq. Ft. 56 10,000 Shelter 260 Sq. Ft. 38 10,000 Los Alamos Sports Park Restroom / Snack Bar # 1 500 Sq. Ft. 190 95,000 Restroom / Snack Bar # 2 500 Sq. Ft. 190 95,000 Restroom / Snack Bar # 3 500 Sq. Ft. 190 95,000 Restrooms 264 Sq. Ft. 189 50,000 Trash Enclosure 180 Sq. Ft. 56 10,000 Trash Enclosure (Mechanical) 620 Sq. Ft. 32 20,000 Los Alamos Sports Park Trash Enclosure # 2 180 Sq. Ft. 56 10,000 Trash Enclosure # 3 180 Sq. Ft. 56 10,000 Shelter 260 Sq. Ft. 38 10,000 Trash Enclosure # 4 180 Sq. Ft. 56 10,000 Trash Enclosure # 5 180 Sq. Ft. 56 10,000 Shelter # 2 260 Sq. Ft. 38 10,000 Los Alamos Sports Park Shelter # 3 2,035 Sq. Ft. 25 50,000 Play Ground Shelter # 1 2,037 Sq. Ft. 25 50,000 Play Ground Shelter # 2 4,225 Sq. Ft. 26 110,000 Trash Enclosure # 6 180 Sq. Ft. 56 10,000 Park Maint. Dept Office 4,517 Sq. Ft. 161 725,000 Storage / Office 2,907 Sq. Ft. 81 235,000 Total Facility Investment 2,755,000$
Acres of Parkland 508.02
Cost per Acre 5,423$
Source: City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 49
Table 10.5 converts undeveloped parkland to an equivalent amount of developed parkland based on the value of an undeveloped acre of land relative to the value of an improved acre of parkland.
Table 10.6 calculates the City’s existing parkland standard per 1,000 capita.
Table 10.4: Park Facilities Unit Costs
Cost
Per Acre Share
Land Acquisition 280,000$ 63%
Park Improvements
Standard Park Improvements 160,000$
Special Use Facilities 5,000
Improvements Cost per Acre 165,000$ 37%
Total Cost per Acre 445,000$ 63%
Sources: Tables 10.2 and 10.3.
Table 10.5: Undeveloped Parkland Equivalent
Type
Cost per
Acre Acres
Parkland Improved 445,000$
Undeveloped Land 280,000
Undeveloped Land Costs 62.92%
Percentage of Parkland costs
Undeveloped Acres 46.10
Equivalent Improved Acres 29.01
Sources: Tables 6.2 and 6.3; Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 50
Table 10.7 calculates the amount and value of facilities needed to serve new development at the existing standard. Through buildout, new development will require 76.16 acres totaling approximately $19.9 million.
Table 10.6: Existing Parkland Standard
Developed Park Acreage 508.02
Undeveloped Equivalent Improved Acreage 29.01
537.03
Service Population (2015) 112,100
Existing Standard (Acres per 1,000 Residents) 4.79
Sources: Tables 10.1, 10.2 and 10;5; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 10.7: Park Facilities to Accommodate New Development Calculation
Parkland
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 residents) A 4.79
Resident Growth (2015-2035) B 15,900
Facility Needs (acres) C = (B / 1,000) x A 76.16
Less Existing Acres D (50.00)
Needed Acreage E = C - D 26.16
Average Unit Cost (per acre) F 280,000$
Total Cost of Parkland To Serve New Development G = E x F 7,324,800$ Improvements
Facility Standard (acres/1,000 residents) A 4.79
Resident Growth (2015-2035) B 15,900
Facility Needs (acres) C = (B / 1,000) x A 76.16
Average Unit Cost (per acre) H 165,000$
Total Cost of Park Improvements To Serve New Development I = C x H 12,566,400$ Total Cost of Land and Improvements J = G + I 19,891,200$ Sources: Tables 10.1, 10.4, and 10.6; City of Murrieta.
Final
July 21, 2016 51
Table 10.8 calculates the cost per capita of new parkland facilities.
Table 10.9 displays the park facilities fee schedule.
Table 10.8: Cost Per Capita Standard
Calculation
Parkland
Parkland Investment (per acre) A 280,000$
Facility Standard (acres per 1,000 residents) B 1.65
Total Cost Per 1,000 capita C = A x B 460,700$
Cost Per Resident D = C / 1,000 461$
Improvements
Parkland Investment (per acre) E 165,000$
Facility Standard (acres per 1,000 residents) B 4.79
Total Cost Per 1,000 capita F = E x B 790,000$
Cost Per Resident G = F / 1,000) 790$
Sources: Tables 10.3, 10.4 and 10.7; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 10.9: Park Facilities Fee Schedule
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D
Cost Per Base Admin
Land Use Capita Density Fee 1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee 1
Single Family
Parkland 461$ 3.42 1,576$ 32$ 1,607$ Improvements 790 3.42 2,702$ 54$ 2,756 Total 4,363$
Multifamily Family
Parkland 461$ 2.39 1,101$ 22$ 1,123$ Improvements 790 2.39 1,888 38 1,926 Total 3,049$
Sources: Tables 2.2 and 10.8; Willdan Financial Services. 1 Persons per dw elling unit or per 1,000 square feet of nonresidential. 2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification analyses.
Final
July 21, 2016 52
Community Centers
Table 11.1 displays the community centers facilities service population.
Table 11.2 displays the City’s existing inventory of community center facilities.
Residents
Existing (2015) 112,100
Growth (2015 - 2035) 15,900
Total (2035) 128,000
Source: Table 2.1.
Table 11.1: Community Centers
Service Population
Table 11.2: Existing Community Centers
Inventory Units Unit Cost1 Value
Land
Community Center 4.72 acres 280,000$ 1,321,600$ Teen Center 3.09 acres 280,000 865,200 Senior Center 2.14 acres 280,000 599,200 Subtotal 9.95 acres 2,786,000$
Buildings
Community Center 8,866 sq. ft. 192$ 1,700,000$ Classrooms 842 sq. ft. 154 130,000 Community Ctr Modular Office 1,440 sq. ft. 110 158,200 Senior Center 9,000 sq. ft. 222 2,000,000 Hay barn, maintenance garage and utility shed3,200 sq. ft. 100 320,000 Equestrian Center Building 1,621 sq. ft. 100 162,100 Equestrian Center Building 1,430 sq. ft. 100 143,000 Equestrian Center Building 754 sq. ft. 100 75,400 Subtotal 4,688,700$
Total Value - Existing Community Centers 7,474,700$
Sources: City of Murrieta; Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 53
Table 11.3 displays the net cost of planned community centers.
Table 11.4 below shows the calculation of the system standard (existing + future facility value / future service population). Under the system standard the non-fee funding identified must be paid by the planning horizon, or new development has paid too high a fee.
Table 11.5 below shows the maximum justified impact fees resulting from using the system standard.
The City can charge any fee up to this amount.
Amount Units Unit Cost Total
Community Room Addition 9,000 Sq. Ft. 344$ 3,096,000$ Youth Center 6,500 Sq. Ft. 344 2,236,000
Community Center 30,000 Sq. Ft. 344 10,320,000 Aquatic Center (Los Alamos) Pool / Splash Pad 5,000,000 Subtotal 20,652,000$
(Less Existing Fund Balance) (89,882)
Net Cost of Planned Facilities 20,562,118$
Table 11.3: Planned Community Center Facilities
Sources: Capital Improvement Plan FY 2013-14 to FY 2017-18, City of Murrieta, California; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 11.4: Community Center Facilities System Standard Value of Existing Facilities 7,474,700$
Cost of Planned Facilities 20,562,118
Total System Value (2035) 28,036,818$
Future Service Population (2035) 128,000
Cost Allocation per Capita 219$
Sources: Tables 11.1 and 11.2; Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 54
Table 11.6 below shows the fee revenue resulting from using the system standard methodology. Under the system standard, the City must fund the remaining $17.1 million with a funding source other than impact fees, or new development will have paid too high a fee.
Library Facilities
Table 12.1 displays the existing and future library facilities service population.
Table 11.5: Community Centers Facilities Fee
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D
Cost Per Base Admin
Land Use Capita Density Fee 1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee
Residential
Single Family 219$ 3.42 749$ 15$ 764$ Multi-family 219 2.39 523 10 533 Sources: Tables 2.2 and 11.3.
1 Fee per dw elling unit.2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue Table 11.6: Revenue Projection - System Standard
Cost per Capita 219$
Growth in Service Population (2015 - 2035) 15,900
Fee Revenue 3,482,000$
Cost of Planned Facilities 20,562,118
Non-Fee Revenue to Be Identified (17,080,118)$
Sources: Tables 11.1, 11.3 and 11.4.
Final
July 21, 2016 55
Table 12.2 displays the existing inventory of library facilities.
Table 12.3 displays the existing facility standard per resident for library facilities.
Table 12.1: Library Facilities Service Population
Residents
Existing Service Population (2015) 112,100
New Development (2015-2035) 15,900
Total (2035) 128,000
Source:Table 2.1; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 12.2: Existing Library Facilities
Inventory Units Unit Cost1 Value
Existing Library
Land (acres) 2.64 acres 280,000$ 739,200$ Building 23,375 square feet - 7,600,000 Mechanical Building 1,581 square feet 185,000 Collection na items 3,900,000
Total Value - Existing Library Facilities 12,424,200$
1 Unit costs based on actual construction costs for existing library. Cost per item based on data from similar jurisdictions. 2 Planned increases in collection based on maintaining ratio of building space to items.
Sources: City of Murrieta; Willdan Financial Services.
Final
July 21, 2016 56
Table 12.4 calculates the impact fee revenue needed to maintain the existing standard of library facilities.
Table 12.5 displays the library facilities fee schedule.
Table 12.3: Library Facilities Existing Standard
Value of Existing Facilities 12,424,200$
Existing Service Population 112,100
Facility Standard per Resident 111$
Sources: Tables 12.1 and 12.2; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 12.4: Library Impact Fee Revenue
Cost per Resident 111$
Growth in Service Population 15,900
Projected Impact Fee Revenue 1,764,900$
Sources: Tables 12.1 and 12.3; Willdan Financial Services.
Table 12.5: Library Facilities Fee
A B C = A x B D = C x 0.02 E = C + D
Cost Per Admin
Land Use Capita Density Base Fee 1 Charge1, 2 Total Fee Residential
Single Family 111$ 3.42 380$ 8$ 388$ Multi-family 111 2.39 265 5 270 Sources: Tables 2.2 and 12.3.
1 Fee per dw elling unit.
2 Administrative charge of 2.0 percent for (1) legal, accounting, and other administrative support and (2) impact fee program administrative costs including revenue collection, revenue and cost accounting, mandated public reporting, and fee justification