Cities Index.
ATT 1 - Attachment A - Draft Resolution No. 24-4799

Murrieta City Council
December 3, 2024

Document
ATT 1 - Attachment A - Draft Resolution No. 24-4799
Meeting
December 3, 2024
Body
Murrieta City Council
Original file
30 KB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on murrieta.legistar1.com. That file is the official record.

RESOLUTION 24-4799
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA INTERFERING WITH THE CITY’S LAND USE AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City of Murrieta (“Murrieta”) incorporated on July 1st 1991; and WHEREAS, the citizens of the unincorporated area that is now Murrieta wanted to become a city to have local control over their land use and services including public safety; and WHEREAS, after incorporation Murrieta adopted a general plan and zoning code that established a blue print of housing densities and infrastructure to mitigate the growth outlined in the general plan and provided a framework for the establishments of public facilities, including parks, libraries, senior centers, City Hall, Police Station, and other recreational amenities; and WHEREAS, Murrieta has blossomed into a beautiful City that is home to thousands of families that enjoy a high quality of life living there; and WHEREAS, the State of California has concluded that there is not enough housing in the State and has mandated that all municipalities desiring to sell any excess land must comply with the “Surplus Land Act” which requires the public agency to offer the land for sale to recreational and educational public entities and to housing developers. Under the Surplus Land Act if any housing developer indicates interest in the land, the public agency desiring to sell the land must enter into a good faith negotiation period with any and all potentially interested developers and comply with rigorous guidelines in doing so. Additionally, the public agency must record a covenant against the land requiring between 15 and 25% of any future housing constructed on the land to be deed restricted as affordable housing. These requirements apply regardless of the location of the land and, in combination with other newer laws allowing increased density for affordable housing and limiting the discretion public agencies traditionally had in many areas of housing development, potentially allow the development of high density projects that were never contemplated by the Murrieta General Plan; and WHEREAS, the State of California, through The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process, has been a critical framework for addressing California’s alleged housing needs, and thus has mandated that Murrieta update the Housing Element of the city’s General Plan to demonstrate that the City can accommodate the building of 3,043 new dwelling units, the majority of which are deed restricted for occupancy or ownership as affordable units, by 2029 during the 6th RHNA cycle of 2021 through 2029.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

The recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference.

The City is opposed to being mandated to approve the building of 3043 additional housing units with limited environmental review and being required to mitigate the impacts on approximately 30,000 new residents and 3000 more vehicles to travel on roads that already exceed their capacity today, the impact on our public safety and other municipal services, the impacts to our public schools and healthcare facilities.

The City hereby encourages all 482 California cities to oppose this unfunded mandate of providing high density housing to meet unrealistic goals set by the State by embracing and this resolution under their own city’s name, and collectively meeting with the Governor and legislators to reverse this mandate that will devastate municipal services statewide and reduce the quality of life of all Californians.

Should the Governor and legislature ignore and not mitigate the impacts of this mandate, then California Cities will be forced to take additional actions to represent the interest of our residents and preserve local control.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ________, 202__.

Lori Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Tiffany J. Israel, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§
CITY OF MURRIETA )
I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 24-4799 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Murrieta at the regular meeting thereof, held on the ___th day of _______, 202_, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

← All documents from this meeting