MEMBERS
Amencan lnsutuce of
Certified Public Accountants
PCPS The A/CPA Alliance
(01 CPA Fi,ms
Governmental Audit
Q11C1/1ty Cenre,
Califot nia Society of
Certified Public Accountants
•
Proud Member of
AlliottGlobalAlliance~
ROGERS , ANDERSON , MALODY & SCOTT , LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. SINCE 1948
STAB ILITY . ACCURACY. TRUST.
-1-
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING AND
ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
Independent Auditor’s Report
To the Honorable City Council
City of Murrieta
Murrieta, California
We have audited, in accordance with the auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of Am erica and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards) ,
the financial statements of the governmental activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Murrieta (the City) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2024, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and have issued our report thereon dated December 12, 2024.
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of ex pressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the purpo se of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the City’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses.
However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies may exist that were not identified.
461
-2-
Report on Compliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements.
However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards.
Purpose of This Report
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control or on compliance. This report is an integral par t of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control and comp liance. Accordingly, this communication is not suitable for any other purpose.
San Bernardino, California
December 12, 2024
462
735 E. Carneg ie Dr . Suit e I 00
San Bernardino . CA 92408
909 889 0871 T
909 889 5361 F
ramscpa . net
PARTNERS
Scott W Manno. CPA. CGMA
Leena Shanbhag, CPA. MST. CGMA
Bradferd A. Welebir. CPA. MBA. CGMA
Jenny W. Liu. CPA, MST
Ga,·denya Duran, CPA, CGMA
Brianna Schultz, CPA. CGMA
Brenda L. Odle. CPA. MST (Partne, Emeritus)
Te, ry P Shea, CPA (Panner Emenws)
MANAGERS/ STAFF
Seong-Hyea Lee. CPA. MBA
Evelyn Morenlin-Barcena. CPA
Vernnica Hernandez, CPA
Laura A1v1zu. CPA
John Maldonado, CPA, MSA
Julia Rodriguez Fuentes. CPA, MSA
Dem, Hite. CPA
Jeffrey McKennan. CPA
Mornca Wysock,, CPA
Jacob Weatherb,e. CPA, MSA
Bolim Han. CPA. MAcc
A nny Gonzalez, CPA
MEMBERS
Amencan lnsutuce of
Certified Public Accountants
PCPS The A/CPA Alliance
(01 CPA Fi,ms
Governmental Audit
Q11C1/1ty Cenre,
Califot nia Society of
Certified Public Accountants
•
Proud Member of
AlliottGlobalAlliance~
ROGERS , ANDERSON , MALODY & SCOTT , LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS. SINCE 1948
STAB ILITY . ACCURACY. TRUST.
-3-
REPORT ON COMPLIANCE FOR EACH MAJOR FEDERAL PROGRAM;
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE; AND REPORT
ON SCHEDULE OF EXPENDITURES OF FEDERAL AWARDS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFORM GUIDANCE
Independent Auditor’s Report
The Honorable City Council
City of Murrieta
Murrieta, California
Report on Compliance for Each Major Federal Program
Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
We have audited the City of Murrieta’s (the City) compliance with the types of compliance requirements described in the OMB Compliance Supplement that could have a direct and material effect on each of the City’s major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2024. The City’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditor’s results section of the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs.
In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the types of compliance requirements referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2024.
Basis for Opinion on Each Major Federal Program
We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United Stat es of America (GAAS); the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards); and the audit requirements of Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Our responsibilities under those standards and the Uniform Guidance are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section of our report.
We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with re levant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion on compliance for each major federal program. Our audit does not provide a legal determination of the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above.
463
-4-
Responsibilities of Management for Compliance
Management is responsible for compliance with the requirements referred to above and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of effective internal control over compliance with the requirements of laws, statutes, regulations, rules and provisions of co ntracts or grant agreements applicable to the City’s federal programs.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether material noncompliance with the compliance requirements referred to above occurred, whether due to fraud or error, and express an opinion on the City’s compliance based on our audit. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee t hat an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards , and the Uniform Guidance will al ways detect material noncompliance when it exists. The risk of not detecting material noncompliance resulting from fraud is higher than for that resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, fo rgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Noncompliance wi th the compliance requirements referred to above is considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, it would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user of the report on compliance about the City’s compliance with the requirements of each major federal program as a whole.
In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS, Government Auditing Standards , and the Uniform Guidance, we:
Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. Identify and assess the risks of material noncomp liance, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the City’s compliance with the compliance requirements referred to above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Obtain an understanding of the City’s internal cont rol over compliance relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances and to test and report on internal control over compliance in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control over compliance.
Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and any significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal control over compliance that we identified during the audit.
Report on Internal Control over Compliance
A deficiency in internal control over compliance exists when the design or operation of a control over compliance does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or detect and correct, noncomp liance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A material weakness in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal contro l over compliance, such that there is a reasonable possibility that material noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A significant deficiency in internal control over compliance is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over compliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is less severe than a material weakness in internal control over compliance, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with governance.
464
-5-
Our consideration of internal control over compliance was for the limited purpose described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of Compliance section above and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control over compliance that might be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance. Given these limitations, du ring our audit we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over compliance that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. However, material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in internal control over compliance may exist that were not identified.
Our audit was not designed for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
Report on Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Required by the Uniform Guidance
We have audited the financial statements of the City as of and for the year ended June 30, 2024, and have issued our report thereon dated December 12, 2024, which contained unmodified opinions on those financial statements. Our audit was performed for t he purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements as a whole. The accomp anying schedule of expenditures of federal awards is presented for purposes of additional analysis as required by the Uniform Guidance and is not a required part of the financial statements. Such information is the resp onsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting a nd other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the schedule of expenditures of federal awards is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the financial statements as a whole.
The purpose of this report on internal control over compliance is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over compliance and the results of that testing based on the requirements of the Uniform Guidance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
San Bernardino, California
December 12, 2024
465
City of Murrieta
Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards
Year Ended June 30, 2024
See accompanying notes to the schedule of expenditures of federal awards. -6-
Federal Grantor/Pass-Through Grantor/Program Title
Assistance
Listing
Number
Program/Project
Identification Number
Federal
Expenditures
Amount
Provided to
Subrecipients
U.S. Department of Commerce
Direct Assistance:
Economic Development Cluster:
Economic Development Administration Grant 11.300 NA 149,858 $ - $ Total Assistance Listing 11.300 / Economic Development Cluster 149,858 - Total U.S. Department of Commerce 149,858 -
U.S. Department of Justice
Direct Assistance:
Bulletproof Vest Partnership Grant 16.607 NA 1,096 - Total Assistance Listing 16.607 1,096 -
Equitable Sharing Funds 16.922 CA0334200 363,713 - Total Assistance Listing 16.922 363,713 -
Total U.S. Department of Justice 364,809 -
U.S. Department of Transportation
Passed through the State of California Office of Traffic Safety:
Highway Safety Cluster:
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program 20.600 PT24126 56,298 - Selective Traffic Enforcement Program 20.600 PT23051 10,611 Total Assistance Listing 20.600 / Highway Safety Cluster 66,909 - Selective Traffic Enforcement Program 20.608 PT24126 60,758 - Selective Traffic Enforcement Program 20.608 PT23051 21,221 - Total Assistance Listing 20.608 81,979 -
Total U.S. Department of Transportation 148,888 - U.S. Department of the Treasury
Direct Assistance:
Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (ARPA) 21.027 NA 2,148,256 - Total Assistance Listing 21.027 2,148,256 -
Total U.S. Department of the Treasury 2,148,256 -
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Direct Assistance:
Regional Homeless Alliance Program - SAMHSA Grant 93.493 1H79FG000733-01 182,119 - Total Assistance Listing 93.493 182,119 -
Total U.S. Department of the Health and Human Services 182,119 - U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Passed through California Governor's Office of Emergency Services:
Federal Hazard Mitigation Grant 97.039 FEMA-4558-DR-CA 5,385 - Total Assistance Listing 97.039 5,385 -
Federal Emergency Management Agency Safer 97.083 EMW-2019-FF-01158 429,537 - Total Assistance Listing 97.083 429,537 -
Passed through the County of Riverside Emergency Management Department EMPG Program 97.042 2023-0006 24,680 -
Total Assistance Listing 97.042 24,680 -
Homeland Security Grant Program 97.067 NA 14,617 - Total Assistance Listing 97.067 14,617 -
Total U.S. Department of Homeland Security 474,219 - Total Expenditures of Federal Awards 3,468,149$ - $
466
City of Murrieta
Notes to the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards Year Ended June 30, 2024
-7-
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) includes the federal awards activity of the City of Murrieta (the City) under federal programs of federal government for the year ended June 30, 2024. The information in this SEFA is presented in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Because the SEFA presents only a selected portion of the operations of the City, it is not intended to and does not present the financial position, changes in net position or fund balance, or cash flows of the City.
For the purposes of this schedule, federal financial assistance includes both federal financial assistances received directly from a federal agency, as well as federal funds received indirectly by the City from a nonfederal agency or other organization. Only that portion of program expenditures reimbursable with such federal funds are reported in the accompanying schedule.
Program expenditures in excess of the maximum federal reimbursement authorized or the portion of the program expenditures that were funded with state, local or other non-federal funds are excluded from the accompanying schedule.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Expenditures reported on the SEFA are reported on the modified accrual basis of accounting.
Such expenditures are recognized following the cost principles contained in the Uniform Guidance, wherein certain types of expenditures are not allowable or are limited as to reimbursement. Negative amounts shown on the SEFA, if any, represent adjustments or credits made in the normal course of business to amounts reported as expenditures in prior years.
3. De Minimis Indirect Cost Rate
The City did not elect to use the 10-percent indirect cost rate allowed under the Uniform Guidance .
467
City of Murrieta
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended June 30, 2024
-8-
SECTION I. SUMMARY OF AUDITOR'S RESULTS
Financial Statements
audited were prepared in accordance with GAAP: Unmodified Internal control over financial reporting:
Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Yes X None Reported Noncompliance material to financial
statements noted? Yes X No
Federal Awards
Internal control over major federal programs:
Material weakness(es) identified? Yes X No
Significant deficiency(ies) identified? Yes X None Reported Type of auditor's report issued on compliance for major federal programs: unmodified Any audit findings disclosed that
are required to be reported in
accordance with 2 CFR 200.516(a) Yes X No
Identification of major federal programs:
CFDA Number
21.027
Dollar threshold used to distinguish
between type A and type B programs: 750,000 $
Auditee qualified as low-risk auditee? X Yes No
Name of Federal Program
Type of auditor's report issued on whether the financial statements Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal
Recovery Funds (ARPA)
468
City of Murrieta
Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs
Year Ended June 30, 2024
-9-
Section II: Financial Statement Findings
No findings to be reported.
Section III: Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs
No findings to be reported.
469
City of Murrieta
Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings
Year Ended June 30, 2024
-10-
No prior year findings were reported.
470
Rogers, Anderson, Malody & Scott, LLP
Annual Audit Presentation
For the year ended June 30, 2024
January 21, 2025
Presented by:
Jeffrey McKennan, CPA
Senior Accountant