Agenda packet — Murrieta City Council, August 19, 2025 (part 5 of 6)

SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Task 1.1. Project Management
This task will include ongoing general project management activities.

Mark Thomas will maintain project files in electronic format in conformity with Caltrans’ Uniform Filing System. A correspondence and submittal log will be used to track correspondence, submittals and other significant project data.

Mark Thomas will provide support and participate in coordination and presentations to the City of Murrieta and as necessary.

Task 1.2. Monthly Project Team Meetings (10)
Mark Thomas will lead the overall coordination effort with the project team in consultation with and under the direction of the City assigned Project Manager. Mark Thomas will schedule, prepare for, and attend project team meetings with City and Caltrans to share project information, make decisions, assign project tasks, and identify items critical to project delivery. Key team members will be present at each team meeting depending on the items to be discussed. Mark Thomas will prepare and distribute agendas prior to each meeting and prepare meeting minutes with action items within one week after the meeting. It is assumed there will be approximately 10 PDT meetings held in a virtual format. Additional focus meetings will be held as necessary.

Task 1.3. Monthly Schedule Updates (10)
Mark Thomas will develop a milestone schedule and incorporate the activities in an overall schedule for the project.

The project schedule should show all the expected sequence of tasks and subtasks and include durations for the performance of each task, subtask, milestones, submittal dates and review periods for each submittal. Working with the City Project Manager and other project team members, Mark Thomas shall prepare, maintain and use a critical action items list to monitor project progress and to implement recovery action plans.

Task 1.4. Stakeholder Meetings / Other Coordination (1) Mark Thomas will develop project presentation materials for up to one (1) presentation to be given at a City Council meeting or Stakeholder workshop. Mark Thomas Project Manager (PM) and Principal-in-Charge (PIC) will attend the presentation. Project presentation materials will include a PowerPoint presentation and exhibits compiled from existing project information.

Task 1.5. QC Plan / Program
Mark Thomas will implement established Quality Assurance (QA) Procedures, which includes performing Quality Control (QC) and QA Audits for the project. The QA/QC program is overseen by a companywide QA Manager, whose role is to implement companywide QC standards, confirm and audit QC procedures on projects, and to verify that all finished products meet the current standard of practice.

Independent QC reviews will be performed at each level of completion by an experienced staff member not directly involved with the project. QC Checklists specific to the discipline involved in creating the deliverable will be used, with comments, responses by the design team, and verification of implementation fully documented.

QA audits will be performed at major milestones at least twice on the project by a QA Auditor, who is not directly involved with the project. The QA Audits will review all records of QC on the project and will provide feedback to the 762

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 2 of 13 ends

PM and PIC. QA Audits review everything from completions of QC reviews to project budget, schedule, incorporation of client and stakeholder comments, and other tasks pertinent to the successful completion of the work on time and within budget.

Task 1.6. Outreach and Public Meetings (1)
Mark Thomas will prepare and attend one (1) open house style public meeting to provide a project update to the public and obtain feedback on final design elements. Mark Thomas will prepare and produce the exhibits for the meeting.

DELIVERABLES
• Monthly Project Progress Reports/Invoices
• PDT Meeting Agendas, Minutes, and Action Items Lists, Data Request Log, Design Decision Log (Kick Off and 9 Meetings)
• General Meeting/Outreach and/or Public meeting Agendas, Minutes, Action Items, and/or presentation slides (PDF/MS PPT - 2 meetings)
• CPM Design Schedule / Risk Register (PDF)
• QC Plan (PDF)
TASK 2. FIELD SURVEY
Task 2.1. Field Visits and Research
Mark Thomas will field walk site and inventory visible utility, topography, drainage, and other notable features.

Additionally, Mark Thomas will generate field notes and a 360-degree photograph log with GIS mapping link.

Prior to commencing any surveying/boundary retracem ent activities, Mark Thomas will secure available r esearch from the City of Murrieta, County of Riverside, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC & WCD) and any project information supplied by the City. The following is included as part of this scope of services:

1. Secure vesting deeds and review to establish owners hip of all recorded interests, including fee ownership of Impacted properties as identified in the Project Understanding.

2. Review Preliminary Title Reports. An allowance of $1,000 has been established to acquire an anticipated twenty-six (26) Title Reports.

3. Secure available Parcel Maps/Tract Maps/Records of Survey/Corner Records and other record mapping from the Riverside County Surveyor.

4. Request from the City of Murrieta and Riverside County any available documentation showing centerline monument ties, benchmarks, roadway vacation documen ts, as-built improvement plans, and building and safety related permits/land covenants.

5. Secure records/roadway and drainage as-builts (as made available).

Task 2.2. Supplemental Survey
Once the geometrics are refined utilizing the aerial mapping, Mark Thomas will perform supplemental design survey using a combination of stationary LiDAR, conventional Total Station, differential levels and global positioning system (GPS) procedures to locate all hardscape, drainage features, utility facilities, break lines, driveways, and other pertinent features to produce accurate elevations and horizontal coordinates with tolerance of +/- ½”:

The design survey data collected from this phase will be downloaded, processed and tied to the horizontal and vertical control established for the Project. Mark Thomas will generate a Final Topographic Survey Base Map at 1” = 50’ scale.

763

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 3 of 13 ends

Mapped features will generally include edge of pavement/curb and gutter/sidewalk, driveways, parking features, roadway crown, toes/tops, landscape features such as monument signs/irrigation control valves/significant vegetation and trees, manholes, drop inlets, walls, signs, utility/light/signal poles, above ground utility service facilities, storm drain facilities, and other visible improvements at the surface elevation. Break lines will be collected along all mapped improvements listed above to create continuous contours with a 1.0’ interval and a Digital Terrain Model (DTM).

Task 2.3. Right of Way Base Maps (LandNET) (OPTIONAL)
Mark Thomas to prepare preliminary right of way basemap based on GIS linework and calculated record data.

Mark Thomas will deploy field crews to locate centerline, right of way, jurisdictional limits and impacted property corner monumentation within the Project Limits and retracement area generally shown below. Mark Thomas will review and analyze the property records, easements, corner records, record maps, centerline ties, and as-built information obtained. Mark Thomas will then delineate the street centerlines and right of way within the project area.

Mark Thomas will do a boundary retracement determination on up to twenty-six (26) property acquisition parcels and will plot easements within said parcels per Preliminary Title Reports acquired.

All results will be depicted in a Land Net Base Map and distributed to the project team to be used as the basis of existing street centerlines, rights of way, easements and property lines used in all property acquisition efforts. Land Net Base Map will also Include grid markers demonstrating 100-foot Intervals along the California State Plane Coordinate system NAD83 for northing and easting coordinates. A Monument PNEZD Summary Table will be provided illustrating all found monumentation and any control set along the corridor with corresponding survey point numbers, northings, eastings, elevations, and a detailed description of the monuments/control points.

DELIVERABLES
• 360-degree photograph log with GIS mapping link
• Project Control, Report and Control Diagram (PDF)
• Digital Terrain Model (DTM) and/or Supplemental Survey Points (ACAD Civil 3D) (OPTIONAL) • Boundary Retracement for Caltrans Basemaps (LandNET) (OPTIONAL) • Preliminary Title Reports (PDF) (OPTIONAL)
TASK 3. UTILITY COORDINATION
Task 3.1. Utility Coordination Meetings (all utilities) Mark Thomas will provide final utility coordination for the project. Utility coordination services will be conducted in general conformance with Caltrans Local Assistance and Utility Relocation Manuals, and applicable local agencies and utility owners’ requirements.

Task 3.2. Utility Coordination Letters
Mark Thomas will work with the City and Caltrans to finalize all utility agreements and certifications. This will include preparing Utility “B” and “C” letters along with Notice to Owners, Reports of Investigations, and Utility Agreements to satisfy Caltrans requirements. Once completed, Utility Certification packages will be sent to the City and Caltrans for approval and included in the Right of Way Certification package.

Task 3.3. Utility Research
Mark Thomas will obtain utility as-builts.
764

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 4 of 13 ends

Task 3.4. Preparation of Composite Utility Plan (OPTIONAL) Mark Thomas will help the City with conceptual relocation plans.

Task 3.5. Potholes (subsurface investigation) (23)
SAFEPROBE shall provide subsurface exploration services as per the following:

1. Provide equipment, skilled personnel, trained technician and supplies necessary to perform utility location services (potholing), utilizing air/vacuum soil extraction method.

2. Provide electronic equipment, skilled personnel and trained technician if requested to perform electronic designation.

3. Contact Underground Service Alert (USA), mark areas for USA and coordinate with utility owners alerted by USA.

4. Soil will be air/vacuum extracted form the test holes to expose the utility to be measured, in such manner to insure the safety and integrity of the utility.

5. The disturbed areas will be restored, as neatly as reasonably possible to the condition prior to the soil extraction process.

6. Backfill and compact in 6" lifts maximum using original soil unless agency regulations require a special fill and provide cold patch pavement restoration or in-kind.

7. Provide the following information for each test hole:
a. Utility will be measured to one tenth of a foot from existing ground to top of utility, identified as to type, location, and size of pipe.
b. Located by nail placed in asphalt or flags where only soil exists. c. Photo of each exposed found utility

8. The location of the potholes will be as per drawings and plans from Client indicating the locations of the proposed potholes.

Task 3.6. Utility Certification (final plans, agreements, conflict resolution) It is the burden of the utility owner to provide claims for relocation costs. To facilitate the determination of costs, Mark Thomas will work closely with the affected utility owners to develop relocation plans that will clear the project.

Based on the existing rights of installation of each owner (easement, lease, permit, prior right), Mark Thomas will prepare our recommendations for liability split. In the event of disagreement on the liability split with the owner, these recommendations will be used for discussion with the Owner and Caltrans.

When the relocation plans are received, Mark Thomas will check the relocation design against the latest project plans for conflicts. Mark Thomas will then send a copy of the Final Plans (“C” Plans) along with a Notice to Owner (NTO) directing the utility company to initiate relocation construction. Based on the approved relocation plan from each owner and the agreed liability split, Mark Thomas will prepare Report of Investigations as required by the Caltrans Right of Way Manual.

DELIVERABLES
• Utility Coordination Meetings (up to 10)
• Utility Coordination Letters (PDF - ABC Letters)
• Utility Mapping matrix and research file (Excel)
• Utility Preliminary Relocation Layouts / Composite Utility Plan (PDF) (OPTIONAL) • Report of Investigation Submittal (PDF)
• Potholing (up to 23)
• Utility Agreements (PDF and MS Word)
• Notice to Owners (PDF)
765

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 5 of 13 ends

TASK 4. RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING (26 PARCELS)
Task 4.1. Right of Way Requirements Maps (OPTIONAL)
Mark Thomas will prepare a right of way needs map based upon right of way mapping to identify permanent and temporary right of way requirements. Mapping will identify necessary area for acquisition, existing underlying ownership information and impacts to existing easements as can be determined from available information. Land rights required for utility relocation (as best understood prior to final utility company prepared utility relocation plans) will also be depicted on the right of way requirements mapping (50 scale). The right of way requirements maps will be prepared in Caltrans format and submitted concurrently with the 95% PS&E and will be updated following any additional design refinements.

Task 4.2. Appraisal Maps
Mark Thomas to prepare Right of Way Appraisal maps based on the final Land Net mapping. The Right of Way Appraisal Map will identify the boundary of the Right of Way to be acquired based on the design engineers Right of Way requirements. Appraisal Maps show the acquisition parcels to be acquired, areas, types of estate to be acquired, and improvements. These maps are used for determining property values and severance damages, appraisal reports, right of way certification, and utility. It is assumed that the ROW Appraisal Map to be prepared by Mark Thomas will be up to one (1) sheet.

Task 4.3. Legal Descriptions and Plats
Mark Thomas will prepare up to twenty-six (26) Legal Descriptions and Plat map exhibits for impacted properties under the responsible charge of California Licensed Professional Land Surveyor.

DELIVERABLES
• Right of Way Requirements Maps (PDF) (OPTIONAL)
• Appraisal Maps (PDF)
• Legal Descriptions and Plats (PDF)

TASKS 5, 6 AND 7 PS&E
This task assumes an anticipated level of effort based on an 8-month project duration. If approval of PS&E documents exceeds this timeframe, then scope of work will be revisited.

The PS&E package will be prepared in conformance with Caltrans design and drafting standards. PS&E packages will be submitted at 95% (Task 5), 100% (Task 6), and Final (Task 7) stages of completion as described below. The Mark Thomas team will review comments from the 65% Roadway PS&E from the City and Caltrans and incorporate the comments into the 95% PS&E submittal.

The total plan package will be developed over a series of submittals with the following plan sheets comprising the final plan package:

766

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 6 of 13 ends

Roadway and Electrical Plans
Approximate sheet count:

Sheet Description Estimated Number of Sheets
Title Sheet 1
Typical Cross Sections 15
Key Map and Line Index 1
Project Control 1
Layouts 9
Profile and Superelevation Diagram 24
Construction Details 23
Contour Grading 9
Drainage Plans, Profiles and Quantities 16
Utility Plans 9
Construction Area Signs 1
Stage Construction, Traffic Handling and Detour Plans 18 Pavement Delineation Plans, Details and Quantities 10
Sign Plans, Details and Quantities 14
Summary of Quantities 2
Retaining Wall Plans 4
Erosion Control Plans, Details and Quantities 11
Electrical Plans, Details and Quantities 10
Total Sheets 178

Structures Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare structural calculations and plans for the Keller Rd Undercrossing (UC) widen selected bridge alternative and two Sub-Horizontal Ground Anchor (SHGA) retaining walls, one on either side of Keller Rd in front of Keller Rd UC abutment. For the purposes of this scope of work, it is assumed that a single span, cast-in-place, post- tensioned box girder is the preferred structure alternative.

Approximate sheet count:

Sheet Description Estimated Number of Sheets
Keller Rd UC Widen
General Plan 1
Index to Plans 1
Foundation Plan 1
Abutment 1 Layout 1
Abutment 2 Layout 1
Abutment Details 3
Typical Section 1
Girder Layout 1
Girder Details 2
Aesthetic Details 1
767

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 7 of 13 ends

Miscellaneous Details 1
Log of Test Borings 2
Total Structure Sheets 17
Sub -Horizontal Ground Anchor Retaining Wall (RW 307 shown, RW 308 similar)

General Plan 1
Index to Plans 1
Structure Plan 1
SHGA Details 1
Drainage Details 1
Miscellaneous Details 1
Log of Test Borings 1
Total Structure Sheets 7

Landscape and Irrigation Plans (OPTIONAL)
Approximate Sheet Count:

Sheet Description Estimated Number of Sheets
Planting Legend 1
Planting Plan & Quantities 10
Irrigation Schedule 2
Irrigation Plans & Quantities 10
Total Sheets 23

Layout Sheets
Layout plans will follow Caltrans plan format. Typical cross sections, profiles and superelevation diagrams, and layouts will be provided. Construction details will be required for intersection and gore staking control.

Drainage Plans
Culverts, ditches, inlets, and other drainage features will be shown on the drainage plans. Drainage systems will be numbered with letters assigned to individual drainage items. Drainage profiles will be on separate sheets, followed by drainage details and drainage quantities. Details will be required for any City standards, including manholes.

Erosion Control Plans
Erosion control plans including planting requirements for biostrips and bioswales within the project limits will be prepared. Erosion control plans will be prepared in conformance with current Caltrans requirements.

Utility Plans
Utility plans will be prepared which depict mapped utility facilities at the time of the start of construction. Utility facilities to be relocated by the contractor will be shown, while facilities to be relocated by others will be shown. Utility plans will also include pothole locations. Any utility facilities that will be relocated prior to construction will be shown as an existing condition.

Stage Construction Plans
Mark Thomas will prepare stage construction plans to depict the elements associated with the construction staging approach, including:

768

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 8 of 13 ends

• Identification of proposed facility/lane closures and work zone areas per stage. • Identification of proposed detours required per s tage. • Location of construction area signs
• Temporary pavement delineation per stage.
• Location and limits of k-rail and crash cushions per stage. • Construction notes indicating the major elements of construction to be completed per stage. • Traffic handling notes that describe the proposed traffic handling procedures to be completed per stage.

Electrical Plans
LIN Consulting, Inc. (LCI) shall be responsible for the design of lighting systems for the proposed I-215 freeway merger (on ramps) and diverging (of ramps) from Keller Road within the project limits and redesigning existing bridge soffit lighting impacted by I-215 road widening. This includes coordination with SCE, providing power, and new service cabinets where required.

The lighting design shall meet Caltrans Specifications for lighting levels, and design for the installation of conduit, junction boxes, and wiring as necessary to provide power to new luminaires.

Ramp Metering Systems
LCI shall prepare ramp metering design plans for I-215 northbound and southbound on ramps.

Construction Cost Estimates
Mark Thomas will prepare an itemized engineer’s estimate at all submittal stages of the project. The format will be similar to the Caltrans AASHTOWare format. The unit costs will be determined by reviewing similar recent project bid summaries, recent similar Caltrans Contract Cost Data book, the California Highway Construction Cost Index information and reviewing the Caltrans ESC site for unit costs.

Cost Estimate Certification
Mark Thomas will prepare the Cost Estimate Certification as required by the Caltrans RTL Guide.

Special Provisions
Mark Thomas will develop project special provisions using the current Caltrans Standard Special Provisions during the design phase. The special provisions will be prepared using Microsoft Word. Special Provisions will be submitted at the 95% and 100% submittals. It is assumed the City will provide the boilerplate contract language to be included in the specifications at the 95% submittal.

Constructability Review
Mark Thomas will perform an internal constructability review satisfying Caltrans’ requirements. The review will be performed by construction management staff who are independent of the project design team. Constructability Review comments provided by Caltrans will also be addressed. Comments will be documented and resolved as part of the 100% submittal.

Structure Calculations and Structure Independent Check
Mark Thomas will perform structure design calculations, which will be in accordance with AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th Edition with the California Amendments and Caltrans Seismic Design Criteria, Version 2.0. The 2024 Caltrans Standards and current versions of the Caltrans Structure Technical Policies and Bridge Design Manuals will be used.

Mark Thomas will perform an independent design check of the structure in conformance with Caltrans bridge design procedures. The independent check will be completed by an engineer who was not involved in the original design of the structure. Calculations will be performed to check the bridge layouts and structural integrity. Upon completion of the independent check, discrepancies between the designer and checker will be reconciled and plans updated.

769

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 9 of 13 ends

Task 7.13 Construction CPM Schedule
Task 7.14 Ready to List Support and Certification
Mark Thomas will prepare the Ready to List Certification Form and compile the required documents.

DELIVERABLES (ALL PDF)
• 95% & 100% Plans, Specs, and Estimates
• Structure Independent Check Calculation Package
• Structure Independent Quantity Calculation
• Structural Plans of two (2) non-standard (special design) retaining walls • Retaining wall design calculation
• Special Provisions
• Structure quantities estimates
• Structure construction cost estimates
• Itemized Engineer’s Construction Cost Estimates
• Cost Estimate Certification
• Non-Standard Special Provisions (nSSPs) (if required) • Final PS&E Package
• Constructability Review
• Construction CPM Schedule
• Traffic Safety Review
• Stage Construction and Detour Plans
• Ready to List Certification Checklist/Package
TASK 8. DESIGN SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION
Task 8.1. Construction Support / Bidder Inquires / Request for Information When requested by the City, Mark Thomas will respond to bidder inquiries and/or requests for information for the updated Final PS&E bid package. Mark Thomas will respond to bidder inquiries with up to a maximum of ten (10) responses. Should the City request that Mark Thomas prepare the bid addendum documents and plans, an additional scope and fee will need to be prepares and approved to provide bid addendum documents and plans.

DELIVERABLES
• Ten (10) bidder inquiries / RFI’s / Submittal Reviews TASK 9. ENGINEERING STUDIES (95% THRU FINAL)
Task 9.1. Stormwater Data Report (SWDR)
Based on comments received on the draft SWDR, Mark Thomas will update and finalize the report. Comments will be addressed and documented in a matrix.
770

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 10 of 13 ends

Task 9.2. Drainage Report
Based on comments received on the draft drainage report, Mark Thomas will update and finalize the report. Comments will be addressed and documented in a matrix.

Task 9.3. Supplemental DSDDs (4) (OPTIONAL)
As design progresses, additional nonstandard features may be identified. If design exceptions are required, Mark Thomas will prepare supplemental Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD). The supplemental DSDD will be submitted to Caltrans for approval.

DELIVERABLES (ALL PDF)
• Final SWDR and all attachments
• Final Drainage Report
• Storm Water Information Handout
• Treatment BMP calculations (WQV/WQF)
• Supplemental Design Standard Deviation Document (up to 4 locations) TASK 10. GEOTECHNICAL
Task 10.1. Field Work Borings, Laboratory, and Analysis Geotechnical Investigation
Caltrans is enforcing the AASHTO recommendations of a soil boring at each bridge support locations where substructure width is less than 100 feet; minimum of two borings are required per location where substructure width is greater than 100 feet. For proposed embankments and roadway improvements, a soil boring is proposed every 500 to 1,000 feet. Based on this, EMI’s geotechnical field investigations plan is presented in Table A. Data obtained from some boreholes will be used for multiple design elements. The boreholes will be excavated using a truck-mounted or track- mounted drilling rig. Asphalt concrete cold-patch will be used to replace asphalt that is removed by excavations, and quick-set cement will be used to replace concrete that is removed by excavations.

EMI will prepare a boring location plan and this plan will be used to secure encroachment permits from Caltrans, City of Murrieta, and City of Menifee. Any other permits, if required, will be secured by others.

EMI field personnel will collect soil samples for laboratory testing, including bulk samples of near-surface soils and small disturbed and relatively undisturbed ring samples of deeper soils. The small disturbed and relatively undisturbed soil samples will be collected using split-spoon samplers at a vertical interval of about 5 feet, alternating between the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) sampler and the Modified California Drive (MCD) sampler. Samples of subsurface soils will be logged during the field investigation, secured in their containers or collected in plastic bags, and transported to the EMI laboratory.

Table A. Proposed Soil Boring Information
Design Element Proposed Number of
Borings
Approximate Proposed
Depth (feet)
SB Off -Ramp Bridge 2 80
RW 307 1 50
RW 308 1 50
RW 298 5 40
Overhead Signs 4 40
Roadway Improvements 7 20 – 30
4 5 – 10

771

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 11 of 13 ends

Field Soil Infiltration Testing: EMI will perform two infiltration tests for the project. Depth of the infiltration testing will depend on the design invert elevation of the proposed BMP but is assumed to be no more than 10 feet below existing ground. Each infiltration test well will be soaked overnight and infiltration testing will commence the following day. Well infiltration testing will be performed following USBR 7300-89 method.

Laboratory Testing
Field logs of the boreholes will be reviewed to select representative soil samples for laboratory testing. Various laboratory tests will be performed on soil samples to determine or derive their physical and engineering characteristics.

Anticipated laboratory tests include: in-situ density and moisture content, grain size, direct shear, UU triaxial, R-value, sand equivalent, maximum density and optimum moisture content, and soil corrosion tests. Laboratory tests will be conducted in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards or California Test methods.

Geotechnical Engineering Analyses
Results obtained from the field investigation and laboratory testing will be used to characterize subsurface soils and conditions and create idealized soil profiles for design purposes. The following analyses will be performed for the project:
• Evaluation of seismicity and estimation of Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) based on the Caltrans design criteria, and recommendations of an ARS curve for the bridge structural design. • Assessment of soil liquefaction potential, seismic settlement, and lateral spreading. • Foundation analysis for bridge and retaining walls.
• Assessment of global slope stability and settlement of embankments. • Evaluation of soil corrosivity conditions and recommendations for mitigation measures. • Design of pavement structural section in accordance with the Caltrans method.

Task 10.2. Foundation Reports
EMI will prepare the reports listed in Table B.

Table B. Foundation Reports
Design Element Review Agency Deliverables
SB Off -Ramp Bridge Caltrans One Foundation Report
RW 307 and RW 308 Caltrans One Foundation Report

EMI will address any review comments resulting from the Caltrans review and prepare a Final Foundation Report.

Task 10.3. Geotechnical and Materials Report
EMI will prepare the reports listed in Table C.

Table C. Geotechnical and Materials Reports
Design Element Review Agency Deliverables
RW 298, Overhead Signs, Roadway
Cuts/Embankments and Slopes, BMP Caltrans Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) Pavement Structural Sections Caltrans Materials Report (MR)

EMI will address any review comments resulting from the Caltrans review and prepare Final Geotechnical Design Report and Final Materials Report.

772

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 12 of 13 ends

DELIVERABLES (ALL PDF)
• Foundation Reports (FR)
• Geotechnical Design Reports (GDR)
• Materials Report (MR)
• Note: Log of Geotechnical Borings included with PS&E Package TASK 11. REGULARTORY AGENCY PERMITTING
Task 11.1. Environmental Permitting
VCS Environmental (VCS), will assist the Mark Thomas team to obtain the following regulatory permits:
- USACE Section 404 Nationwide Permit
- RWQCB Section 401 Water Quality Certification
- CDFW Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement
VCS will prepare the regulatory permit applications, utilizing the Jurisdictional Delineation and Natural Environment Study prepared for the project.

VCS will prepare the Section 404 Application for a Nationwide Permit. The 404 permitting process will require that the Corps initiate Section 106 Consultation. VCS will provide the Corps with the Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) and Archeological Survey Report (ASR) and accompanying Area of Potential Effect (APE) and our cultural staff will be available to coordinate with the Corps archeologist on the Section 106 process. While Native American consultation occurred for CEQA, USACE must also conduct its own initiation and coordination with the tribes and the State Historic Preservation Office. Additionally, USACE must initiate consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, which in this case will be a simple letter to the United States Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) who will reply that take authority is covered by the western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan through a streamlined Section

7. The 404 Permit also requires that the 401 Water Quality Certification be issued.

VCS will prepare the RWQCB Section 401 Water Quality Certification application. This requires an alternatives analysis related to the specific water impacts. The RWQCB requires the certified CEQA document in order to fully process and issue a 401.

VCS will prepare the Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement. CDFW also requires the certified CEQA document in order to fully process and issue the 1602 Agreement. This Agreement will have conditions that must be reviewed carefully and can be discussed and/or negotiated with CDFW. VCS will assist the City in identifying conditions that may need to be removed or discussed in further detail with the CDFW.

The Project’s Environmental Commitment Record describes mitigation as “through a mitigation bank approved by CDFW or through payment to an approved in-lieu fee program”. VCS will assist the City in finding the appropriate mitigation. There are few if any credits available within western Riverside and therefore identifying mitigation may be challenging. Pursuant to the Riverside Conservation Authority, waters mitigation must remain in western Riverside. VCS is aware of properties within the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) area that support waters that may be available for applicant sponsored mitigation should bank or in-lieu credits be unavailable.

VCS assumes three field visits. One field visit to confirm delineation and up to two meetings in the field with regulators.

This Scope assumes the following:

1. The current APE and cultural studies will be sufficient for Section 106. 773

I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
City of Mur rieta

Page 13 of 13 ends

2. Typically, the MSHCP Consistency Analysis, JPR and all or part of the Determination of Biologically Superior or Equivalent Preservation (DBESP) is completed during PA/ED. If that is not the case and the City needs assistance with the MSHCP compliance, VCS can provide an additional scope of work.

3. Coordination time with the agencies is subjective and can exceed estimates. We have assumed 150 hours and if all of these hours are not needed, they will not be billed. However, should there be a protracted negotiation with any of the agencies and the City, particularly on mitigation, we are not able to absorb these extra costs.

4. Mitigation options identification – 10 hours. Should applicant sponsored mitigation be required, a change order can be provided to prepare a Habitat Mitigation & Monitoring Plan and all of the associated documents.

5. No new State or Federal threatened or endangered species issues will arise. Should additional work be required related to new species, including surveying and/or permitting, a change order would be required.

6. Coordination with regulators is billed on a time and materials basis due to the subjectivity of the permitting process.

7. The City shall pay all permitting fees.

DELIVERABLES
• Regulatory Agency Permits

774

01375.0006 2025866.1

EXHIBIT “B”

SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)

There are no special requirements for this project.

775

01375.0006 2025866.1
EXHIBIT “C”

SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION

I. City will compensate Consultant for the Services performed upon submission of a valid invoice. Each invoice is to include
A. Line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate.

B. Line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services.

C. Line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation.

D. Line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

II. The total compensation for all Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in the Cover Page of this Agreement.

III. Consultant’s billing rates for any hourly Services are attached as Exhibit C-1. In connection with the services provided pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, City will pay Consultant upon City’s receipt of a written invoice provided by Consultant no more than monthly. City will pay Consultant for work completed, billed in increments of six minutes (0.1 hours), not to exceed the Contract Sum. The City will reimburse the Consultant for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to performing services on behalf of the Client that are approved in advance in writing by the City such as mileage, copies, binding costs, postage, parking, travel, and lodging expenses as part of the not to exceed Contract Sum. To receive reimbursements, the Consultant must provide the City with a receipt and a description of the expense incurred along with the invoice. No mark up on expenses may be added.

776
Sr. Engineering
Manager
Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Technical Lead
Technical Lead
Sr. Project Engineer
Sr. Technical
Engineer
Project Engineer
Civil Engineering
Designer
Sr. Technician
Design Engineer II
Design Engineer I
LAUD Division
Manager
LAUD Project
Manager
Landscape Designer
II
Landscape Designer
I
Survey Division
Manager
Survey Manager II
Project Surveyor II
Asst Surveyor II
Survey Specialist II
2-Person Crew
(OE12)
Division Manager -
CM
Resident Engineer
Project Accountant
Sr. Project
Coordinator
Sr. Graphic Manager
Earth Mechanics,
Inc
Lin Consulting
SafeProbe
VCS
Enter Staff Names if Necessary =>
$439 $323 $299 $253 $245 $210 $195 $210 $188 $183 $153 $293 $235 $143 $111 $380 $276 $223 $156 $186 $444 $409 $306 $159 $181 $231 DBE DBE DBE DBE

1.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Project Management 40 40 8 12 100 $30,795 - - - $30,795.00

1.2 Monthly Project Team Meetings (10) 40 10 40 20 20 130 $38,125 - - - $38,125.00

1.3 Monthly Project Schedule Updates (10) 8 8 $3,510 - - - $3,510.00

1.4 Stakeholder Meetings / Other Coordination (1) 84 8 4 24 $7,185 - - - $7,185.00

1.5 QC Plan / Program 60 60 60 180 $41,550 - - - $41,550.00

1.6 Outreach and Public Meetings (1) 44 8 8 24 $6,355 - - - $6,355.00 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $2,500 - - - $2,500.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 1 1 0 0 1 8 0 6 0 1 4 0 0 8 0 0 0 3 6 00000000000 0 0 8 1 2 1 2 4 6 6 $130,020 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $130,020.00

2.0 FIELD SURVE Y

2.1 Field Visits and Research 4 4 8 8 8 128 1 6 59 $11,583 - $1,517.21 - - $13,099.71

2.2 Supplemental Survey 3 5 10 20 20 40 98 $29,346 - - - $29,346.25 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $3,500 - - - $3,500.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 2 0 4 00048008 8000047 1 8 3 6 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 00 1 5 7 $44,429 $0 $1,517.21 $0 $0 $45,945.96

3.0 UTILITY COORDINATION

3.1 Utility Coordination Meetings (all utilities) 44 0 8 0 124 $23,690 - - - $23,690.00

3.2 Utility Coordination Letters 44 1 6 24 $3,950 - - - $3,950.00

3.3 Utility Research (As-Builts) 41 6 20 $3,220 - - - $3,220.00

3.5 Potholes (subsurface investigation) (23) 0$ 0 - - $0.00

3.6 Utility Certification (final plans, agreements,
conflict resolution) 16 40 56 $10,420 - - $10,420.00 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $420 45,940 - $46,360.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 3 0 4 0000 6 400 1 2 4 3 20000000000 0 0 0 00 2 2 4 $41,700 - $0.00 $45,940 $0 $87,640.00

4.0 RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING (26 Parcels)

4.2 Appraisal Maps 31 05 25 22 6 143 $28,440 - - - $28,440.00

4.3 Legal Descriptions and Plats 5 16 156 156 26 359 $70,248 - - - $70,247.50 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $26,000 - - - $26,000.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 4 0 0 00000000 000008 2 6 2 0 8 2 0 8 5 20 0 0 0 00 5 0 2 $124,688 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $124,687.50

5.0 95% PS&E

5.1 Roadway Plans 8 24 60 100 120 340 620 1272 $227,700 - - - $227,700.00

5.2 Roadway Estimates 4 8 32 32 60 72 208 $38,200 - - - $38,200.00

5.3 Roadway Specifications (SSPs) 21 6 6 0 78 $16,385 - - - $16,385.00

5.4 Structures Plans 24 32 72 200 328 $68,440 - - - $68,440.00

5.5 Structures Calculations/Independent Check 40 100 160 160 180 640 $151,875 - - - $151,875.00

5.6 Structures Estimates 4 1 63 26 0 112 $22,520 - - - $22,520.00

5.7 Structures Specifications (SSPs) 41 6 3 2 52 $12,310 - - - $12,310.00

5.8 Electrical Plans 0$ 0 - $38,994.34 - - $38,994.34

5.9 Electrical Estimates 0$ 0 - $3,175.32 - - $3,175.32

5.10 Electrical Specifications (SSPs) 0 $0 $3,606.46

5.14 Construction CPM Schedule 8 20 16 44 $14,635
OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - - $0.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 5 8 1 0 2 1 1 6 2 9 2 0 2 3 2 4 4 4 1 5 2 2 0 0 4 6 0 6 9 20000000000 2 0 1 6 0 00 2734 $552,065 $0 $45,776.12 $0 $0 $579,599.66

6.0 100% PS&E

6.1 Roadway Plans 4 12 24 72 80 220 280 692 $125,375 - - - $125,375.00

6.2 Roadway Estimates 48 8 2 4 4 0 84 $14,730 - - - $14,730.00

6.3 Roadway Specifications (SSPs) 42 4 28 $5,690 - - - $5,690.00

6.4 Structures Plans 32 60 72 160 324 $73,365 - - - $73,365.00

6.5 Structures Estimates 4 8 20 32 64 $13,050 - - - $13,050.00

6.6 Structures Specifications (SSPs) 48 1 6 28 $6,800 - - - $6,800.00

6.7 Electrical Plans 0$ 0 - $30,462.88 - - $30,462.88

6.8 Electrical Estimates 0$ 0 - $2,933.01 - - $2,933.01

6.9 Electrical Specifications (SSPs) 0$ 0 - $2,826.00 - - $2,826.00

6.13 Construction CPM Schedule 8 8 4 20 $6,055 - - - $6,055.00 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - - $0.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 6 4 5 2 6 8 4 0 0 7 2 1 4 8 8 8 1 6 0 2 7 6 3 2 00000000000 8 4 0 00 1240 $245,065 $0 $36,221.89 $0 $0 $281,286.89

7.0 Final PS&E

7.1 Roadway Plans 2 8 32 60 120 160 382 $68,038 - - - $68,037.50

7.2 Roadway Estimates 2 4 8 16 20 50 $8,935 - - - $8,935.00

7.3 Roadway Specifications (SSPs) 2 20 22 $4,405 - - - $4,405.00

7.4 Structures Plans 12 16 24 40 92 $21,190 - - - $21,190.00

7.5 Structures Estimates 4 4 16 24 $5,405 - - - $5,405.00

7.6 Structures Specifications (SSPs) 4 4 8 16 $4,045 - - - $4,045.00

7.7 Electrical Plans 0$ 0 - $17,970.07 - - $17,970.07

7.8 Electrical Estimates 0$ 0 - $1,587.66 - - $1,587.66

7.9 Electrical Specifications (SSPs) 0$ 0 - $1,803.23 - - $1,803.23

7.13 Construction CPM Schedule 48 12 $2,240 - - - $2,240.00

7.14 Ready to List Support and Certification 4 16 40 60 $11,710 - - - $11,710.00 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - - $0.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 7 2 2 4 2 4 1 2 0 2 4 8 4 6 8 4 0 2 0 0 1 8 00000000000 0 0 0 00 6 5 8 $125,968 $0 $21,360.96 $0 $0 $147,328.46

8.0 DESIGN SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION

8.1 Construction Support/Bidder
Inquires/Request for Information (10) 42 04 0 64 $11,195 9,129.16 $1,459.48 - - $21,783.64 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - - $0.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 8 0 0 4000 2 0000 4 00000000000 0 0 0 00 6 4 $11,195 $9,129.16 $1,459.48 $0 $0 $21,783.64

9.0 ENGINEERING STUDIES (95% THRU FINAL)

TOTAL COST
COST PROPOSAL FOR PROJECT SCOPE - City of Murrieta: I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E Total MT Cost
Mark Thomas
Total
Hours
Subconsultants
*Please note that rates shown are for estimating
purpose only. See Rate Schedule for actual
rates/ranges.

Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only. See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges.

MT Fee ( Rates)
7/18/2025
777

9.1 Stormwater Data Report (SWDR) 4 20 40 160 224 $36,795 - - - $36,795.00

9.2 Drainage Report 8 40 80 200 328 $55,290 - - - $55,290.00 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - - $0.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 9 0 0 1 2000 6 000 1 2 0 3 6 00000000000 0 0 0 00 5 5 2 $92,085 $0 $0.00 $0 $0 $92,085.00

10.0 GEOTECHNICAL

10.1 Field Work Borings, Laboratory and Analysis 0 $0 77,562.46 - - $77,562.46

10.2 Foundation Reports 0 $0 37,798.48 - - $37,798.48

10.3 Geotechnical and Materials Report 0 $0 40,412.28 - - $40,412.28 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 63,710.00 - - $63,710.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 1 0 0 0 00000000 00000000000 0 0 0 000 $ 0 $219,483.22 $0.00 $0 $0 $219,483.22

11.0 REGULATORY AGENCY PERMITTING

11.1 Environmental Permitting 28 2 0 30 $5,100 - - 83,658.80 $88,758.80 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0 - - 300.00 $300.00 S u b t o t a l P h a s e 1 1 0 0 00208000 2 00000000000 0 0 0 00 3 0 $ 5 , 1 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 . 0 0 $ 0 $83,958.80 $89,058.80 TOTAL HOURS 114 204 224 404 142 332 916 308 400 1224 165 20000 1 2 3 3 2 2 6 2 4 4 7 2 4 0 2 8 2 0 8 1 2 1 2 6627 OTHER DIRECT COSTS $32,420.00 $63,710.00 $0.00 $45,940.00 $300.00 $142,370.00 TOTAL COST $50,018 $65,790 $66,920 $102, 010 $34,790 $69,720 $178,620 $64,680 $75,000 $223, 380 $251,930 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,560 $9,116 ####### ####### ####### ####### $11,445 $6,125 $1,270 $2,175 $2,775 $1,372,313.75 $228,612.38 $106,335.66 $45,940.00 $83,958.80 $1,837,160.59 O. OPTIONAL TASKS
O.1 2.3 ROW Base Maps (LandNET) 3 5 16 16 20 24 84 $22,956 - - - - $22,956.25 O.2 3.4 Preparation of Composite Utility Plan 60 240 300 $48,300 - - - - $48,300.00 O.3 4.1 ROW Requirements Maps 82 4 8 0 112 $18,140 - - - - $18,140.00 O.15 9.3 Supplemental DSDDs (4) 24 8 6 0 4 0 114 $20,265 - - - - $20,265.00 Subtotal Optional Tasks 0 2 8 12 0 8 116 0 120 94 504 14 164 332 620 3 5 16 16 20 24 0 0 0 0 0 2078 $109,661.25 $0 $3,910.68 $0 $22,160 $109,661.25 Please note that the rates shown are for estimating purposes only. See rate schedule for actual rates/ranges.

MT Fee ( Rates)
7/18/2025
778
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant: Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Project No. Contract No. Date 7/18/2025

DIRECT LABOR
Range Hours
Actual or
Average
Hourly Rate
Total
$168 - $205 0.0 180.65 $ - $
$115 - $150 114.0 161.76 $ 18,440.45$
$111 - $130 0.0 133.19 $ - $
$111 - $130 0.0 132.72 $ - $
$84 - $120 204.0 118.90 $ 24,255.45$
$81 - $110 224.0 110.14 $ 24,672.06$
$72 - $100 0.0 101.85 $ - $
$70 - $90 404.0 93.09 $ 37,609.04$
$60 - $90 142.0 90.33 $ 12,826.37$
$62 - $75 332.0 77.42 $ 25,704.36$
$49 - $75 916.0 71.89 $ 65,853.60$
$49 - $80 308.0 77.42 $ 23,846.22$
$50 - $70 400.0 69.13 $ 27,650.99$
$40 - $65 1224.0 67.28 $ 82,355.72$
$33 - $50 1652.0 56.22 $ 92,881.53$
$30 - $45 0.0 42.86 $ - $
$17 - $30 0.0 33.18 $ - $
$90 - $105 0.0 107.84 $ - $
$86 - $100 0.0 102.31 $ - $
$63 - $90 0.0 86.64 $ - $
$57 - $70 0.0 68.21 $ - $
$42 - $55 0.0 59.91 $ - $
$37 - $50 0.0 52.54 $ - $
$29 - $35 0.0 41.02 $ - $
$23 - $30 0.0 32.26 $ - $
$96 - $165 12.0 140.10 $ 1,681.18$
$84 - $100 33.0 101.85 $ 3,360.98$
$72 - $95 0.0 93.09 $ - $
$67 - $95 0.0 97.24 $ - $
$58 - $80 226.0 82.03 $ 18,539.07$
$57 - $75 0.0 77.88 $ - $
$51 - $60 0.0 66.36 $ - $
$42 - $55 244.0 57.61 $ 14,055.92$
$39 - $50 0.0 53.00 $ - $
$48 - $90 0.0 87.10 $ - $
$41 - $70 72.0 68.67 $ 4,944.00$
$39 - $60 0.0 58.53 $ - $
$43 - $50 0.0 55.30 $ - $
$42 - $60 0.0 60.83 $ - $
$35 - $55 0.0 55.76 $ - $
$19 - $40 0.0 37.33 $ - $
$84 - $100 0.0 107.38 $ - $
$58 - $70 0.0 82.49 $ - $
$53 - $65 0.0 82.49 $ - $
$51 - $60 0.0 80.65 $ - $
$38 - $55 0.0 56.68 $ - $
$110 - $130 0.0 141.94 $ - $
$168 - $195 0.0 213.83 $ - $
Name
Engineering Manager
Design Manager
Sr. Project Manager
Sr. Technical Lead
Project Manager
Technical Lead
Principal
Classification/Title
I-215/Keller Road Interchang
Sr. Engineering Manager
Design Engineer I
Technician
Intern
LAUD Division Manager
Sr. LAUD Project Manager
LAUD Project Manager
Sr. Project Engineer
Sr. Technical Engineer
Project Engineer
Civil Engineering Designer
Sr. Technician
Design Engineer II
Survey Manager II
Survey Manager I
Project Surveyor III
Project Surveyor II
Project Surveyor I
Asst Surveyor III
Sr. Landscape Architect
Landscape Architect
Landscape Designer II
Landscape Designer I
Landscape Intern
Survey Division Manager
Survey Technician III
Survey Technician II
Survey Technician I
SUE Program Manager
Chief of Party (OE3)
Instrumentperson (OE3)
Asst Surveyor II
Asst Surveyor I
Survey Specialist III
Survey Specialist II
Survey Specialist I
Lead Survey Technician
Chainperson (OE3)
Apprentice (OE3)
2-Person Crew (OE3)
3-Person Crew (OE3)
Prime Consultant
Subconsultant
2nd Tier Subconsultant
779
$55 - $65 0.0 71.43 $ - $
$63 - $75 0.0 91.25 $ - $
$58 - $70 0.0 82.49 $ - $
$55 - $65 0.0 76.96 $ - $
$47 - $55 0.0 66.36 $ - $
$117 - $135 40.0 163.60 $ 6,544.07$
$175 - $205 0.0 242.87 $ - $
$64 - $75 0.0 89.87 $ - $
$139 - $165 28.0 150.70 $ 4,219.54$
$101 - $120 0.0 109.22 $ - $
$94 - $110 0.0 112.91 $ - $
$106 - $125 0.0 125.81 $ - $
$94 - $110 20.0 112.91 $ 2,258.16$
$60 - $70 0.0 84.34 $ - $
$52 - $80 0.0 88.48 $ - $
$45 - $75 0.0 83.87 $ - $
$48 - $70 0.0 74.20 $ - $
$41 - $50 0.0 57.61 $ - $
$30 - $40 0.0 45.62 $ - $
$103 - $125 0.0 128.12 $ - $
$70 - $85 0.0 87.10 $ - $
$39 - $75 0.0 71.43 $ - $
$65 - $75 0.0 82.49 $ - $
$35 - $60 8.0 58.53 $ 468.22 $
$44 - $65 12.0 66.82 $ 801.88 $
$37 - $55 0.0 54.84 $ - $
$40 - $55 0.0 58.53 $ - $
$28 - $40 0.0 34.56 $ - $
$37 - $55 0.0 51.62 $ - $
$36 - $45 0.0 44.70 $ - $
$57 - $80 12.0 85.26 $ 1,023.09$
$43 - $65 0.0 70.51 $ - $
$34 - $45 0.0 52.08 $ - $
$123 - $145 0.0 132.72 $ - $
$109 - $130 0.0 117.06 $ - $
$84 - $100 0.0 91.25 $ - $
$44 - $65 0.0 56.22 $ - $
$34 - $50 0.0 44.24 $ - $
$30 - $40 0.0 33.64 $ - $
$191.71 0.0 191.71 $ - $

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs 493,991.90$
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) (0.00) $ c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] 493,991.90$

INDIRECT COSTS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 94.47%) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 466,674.15 $ f) Overhead (Rate: 52.11%) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 257,419.18 $ h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00%) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $ j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] 724,093.33$
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [[(c) + (j)] x fixed fee 10.00 %] 121,808.52$ Instrumentperson (OE12)
Chainperson (OE12)
Apprentice (OE12)
2-Person Crew (OE12)
3-Person Crew (OE12)
Utility Locator (South)
Utility Locator (North)
Chief of Party (OE12)
Inspector - CM
Office Engineer
Sr. Planner
Planner II
Planner I
Funding Manager
Division Manager - CM
Area Manager - CM
Project Manager - CM
Sr. Resident Engineer
Resident Engineer
Asst. Resident Engineer
Sr. Project Assistant
Project Assistant
Sr. Technical Writer
Technical Writer
Sr. Graphic Manager
Sr. Graphic Designer
Sr. Funding Specialist
Funding Specialist
Project Accountant Manager
Project Accountant
Sr. Project Coordinator
Project Coordinator
Strategic Consulting
Sr. Inspector
Inspector
Inspector - Apprentice
Graphic Designer
District Manager-Engineer
Deputy District Manager
Operations Manager
780
l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary Quantity Unit Unit Cost
1000 miles $0.70 700.00 $
5000 miles $0.70 3,500.00 $
600 miles $0.70 420.00 $
0 sheets $1.00 - $
0 sheets $0.35 - $
0 sheets $0.05 - $
6 RT $300.00 1,800.00 $
0 EA $15.00 - $
0 EA $5,000.00 - $
26 LS $1,000.00 26,000.00 $
0 LS $1,000.00 - $
0 LS $3,000.00 - $
0 Day $260.00 - $
0 Day $8,000.00 - $
0 HR $30.00 - $
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 32,420.00$
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: Earth Mechanics, Inc 228,612.38$
Subconsultant 2: Lin Consulting 106,335.66$
Subconsultant 3: SafeProbe 45,940.00$
Subconsultant 4: VCS 83,958.80$
Subconsultant 5: SUBCONSULTANT 5 -$
Subconsultant 6: SUBCONSULTANT 6 -$
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS 464,846.84$
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] 497,266.84$ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 1,837,160.59$
NOTES:

Mileage - Survey
Reproductions - full size
Reproductions - half size
Structure/Quantity Calculations
Misc. Costs (Flight from Sacramento)
Overnight Mail/Mail
Potholing

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant’s annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Per Diem
MTLS Mobile Scanner
Survey Equipment
Misc. Surveys (Maps, PTR's etc.)
Safety Plan
Traffic Control
Description of Item
Mileage
Mileage - SUE
781
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Direct Labor Subtotal
per Cost Proposal
Total Hours per
Cost Proposal Avg Hourly Rate 1 Year Contract Duration
$493,991.90 / 6627.0 = $74.54 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rates

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Average Hourly Rate Escalation
Year 1 $74.54 + 0.00% = $74.54 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $74.54 + 0.00% = $74.54 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $74.54 + 0.00% = $74.54 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $74.54 + 0.00% = $74.54 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 5 $74.54 + 0.00% = $74.54 Year 6 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 6 $74.54 + 0.00% = $74.54 Year 7 Avg Hourly Rate

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated %
Completed Each Year
Total hours per
Cost Proposal
Total Hours per
Year
Year 1 100% x 6627.0 = 6627.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0% x 6627.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0% x 6627.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0% x 6627.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0% x 6627.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Year 6 0% x 6627.0 = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 6
Total 100% Total 6627.0

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
Estimated hours
(calculated above) Cost per Year
Year 1 $74.54 x 6627.0 = $493,991.90 Estimated Cost Year 1 Year 2 $74.54 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 2
Year 3 $74.54 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 3
Year 4 $74.54 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 4
Year 5 $74.54 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 5
Year 6 $74.54 x 0.0 = $0.00 Estimated Cost Year 6
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation $493,991.90
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation $493,991.90
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase ($0.00) Transfer to Page 1 NOTES:

4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES

1. This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

2. An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology)

3. This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 782
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Certification of Direct Costs:

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Zachary Siviglia Title*: President/CEO
Signature: Date of Certification: 07/18/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone Number: (916) 390-5131 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Address: 516 Gibson Dr. Suite 230, Roseville, CA 95678 *An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Engineering Services
All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements.

Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) 783
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Earth Mechanics, Inc.

Project No. Contract No. Date 7/6/2025
Range Hours Actual
Hourly Rate Total
Principal / PM $105.70 - $111.00 70 105.70$ 7,399.00$ Pr
incipal Engineer / Geologist $78.40 - $81.60 50 80.60$ 4,030.00$ Seni
or Engineer / Geologist $66.90 - $78.30 90 71.80$ 6,462.00$ Sr
. Project Engineer / Geologist $60.50 - $60.70 190 60.50$ 11,495.00$ Pr
oject Engineer / Geologist $52.80 - $60.30 90 60.30$ 5,427.00$ Sr
. Staff Engineer / Geologist $49.60 - $53.40 120 53.40$ 6,408.00$ St
aff Engineer / Geologist $35.50 - $41.80 200 41.80$ 8,360.00$ Seni
or Technician $51.60 - $54.10 90 54.10$ 4,869.00$ Tec
hnician $21.10 - $30.20 50 30.20$ 1,510.00$
LA

BOR COSTS
55,960.00$
c) T
OTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] 55,960.00$
I

NDIRECT COSTS

50.72% ) e) Tot
al Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 28,382.91$
117.17% ) g) Over
head [(c) x (f)] 65,568.33$
0% ) i) Gen & Admi
n [(c) x (h)] -$
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] 93,951.24$
FI
XED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 14,991.12$ l
) CONSULT
ANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total

7.5 Day 6,000.00$ 45,000.00$
5 Day 2,300.00$ 11,500.00$
2800
Mile 0.70$ 1,960.00$
12 Test 250.00$ 3,000.00$
2 EA 325.00$ 650.00$
8 EA 200.00$ 1,600.00$
l
) T
OTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 63,710.00$
m) SUBCONSULT
ANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary)
m) T
OTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS -$
n) T
OTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] 63,710.00$ TO
TAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 228,612.37$
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Ant
icipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation)
d) Fr
inge Benefits (Rate:
f) Over
head & G&A (Rate:
h) Gener
al & Admin (Rate:

Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

Description of Item
Drill Rig Rental
Traffic Control Rental
Mileage
R-Value
Soil Cuttings Contaminants Testing
Soil Cuttings (Drums) Disposal
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the c onsultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Alahesh Thurairajah*
784
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 7/6/2025

1. Cal
culate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 55,960.00 = $ 58.91
Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 58.91
+ = $ 61.85 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 61.85
+ = $ 64.94 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 64.94
+ = $ 68.19 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $ 68.19
+ = $ 71.60 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 950.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% =
950.0
Year 1 $ 58.91 *= $ 55,960.00
Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ 61.85 *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ 64.94 *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ 68.19 *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $ - *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 5
= $ 55,960.00
= $ 55,960.00
= $ - T
ransfer to Page 1
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other me thods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).

This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 5%

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
950.0
950.0
Cost per Year
Earth Mechanics, Inc.

CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
950.0
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
950

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
950
0 0
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
950.0
Total

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
950.0
5%
5%
785
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Gener
ally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Ter
ms and conditions of the contract

3. Ti
tle 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures

5. 23 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Des
ign Related Service

6. 48 Cc
ode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Name: Alahesh Thurairajah Title *: President
Signature: Date of Certification: 7/6/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: 714-751-3826 Address: 17800 Newhope Street, Suite B, Fountain Valley, CA 92708 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Certification of Direct Costs:

Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice Pr
esident or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.
541330 - Geotechnical Engineering
541380 - Laboratory Testing
786
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: LIN Consulting
Project No. Contract No. Date 7/18/2025
Range Hours Actual
Hourly Rate Total
Project Manager 9 105.00$ 945.00$
Seni
or Project Manager 182 86.00$ 15,652.09$
As
sistant Project Manager 196 55.50$ 10,877.75$
Pr
oject Engineer 236 43.50$ 10,265.76$
LA

BOR COSTS
37,740.60$
c) T
OTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] 37,740.60$
I

NDIRECT COSTS

35.12% ) e) Tot
al Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 13,254.50$
121.02% ) g) Over
head [(c) x (f)] 45,673.68$
) i) G
en & Admin [(c) x (h)] -$
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] 58,928.18$
FI
XED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 9,666.88$ l
) CONSULT
ANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
-$
-$
l
) T
OTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS -$
m) SUBCONSULT
ANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary)
m) T
OTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS -$
n) T
OTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] -$ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 106,335.66$
NOTES:

1. 2.

Description of Item
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the c onsultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

Murrieta I-215/Keller IC

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
787
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 7/18/2025

1. Cal
culate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 37,740.60 = $ 60.58
Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 60.58
+ = $ 63.61 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $ 63.61
+ = $ 66.79 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $ 66.79
+ = $ 70.13 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $ 70.13
+ = $ 73.63 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 623.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% =
623.0
Year 1 $ 60.58 *= $ 37,740.60
Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $ 63.61 *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $ 66.79 *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $ 70.13 *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $ - *= $ -
Estimated Hours Year 5
= $ 37,740.60
= $ 37,740.60
= $ - T
ransfer to Page 1
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).

This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 5%
Murrieta I-215/Keller IC

3. Cal
culate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
623.0
623.0
Cost per Year
LIN Consulting

CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
623.0
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
623

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
623
0 0
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
623.0
Total

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
623.0
5%
5%
788
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Gener
ally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Ter
ms and conditions of the contract

3. Ti
tle 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures

5. 23 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Des
ign Related Service

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Name: Sandy Hou Title *: Corporate Secretary/Principal Signature: Date of Certification: 7/18/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: 909-396-6850 Address: 21600 Copley Dr., Suite 270, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Certification of Direct Costs:

Engineering Services
789
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: SafeProbe
Project No. Contract No. Date 5/21/2025
Range Hours Actual
Hourly Rate Total
0 0.00$ 0.00$
-$
-$
-$

LABOR COSTS

0.00$
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] 0.00$

INDIRECT COSTS

0.00% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 0.00$

0.00% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 0.00$
) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] -$
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] 0.00$
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 0.00$ l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
23 Pothole 1,300.00$ 29,900.00$
3 Plan 1,800.00$ 5,400.00$
4 Day 1,700.00$ 6,800.00$
24 Hour 160.00$ 3,840.00$
-$
-$
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 45,940.00$
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS -$
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] 45,940.00$ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 45,940.00$
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:

Subconsultant 1:

Subconsultant 2:

Description of Item
Vacuum excavation (Pothole) maximum of 8 ft depth
Traffic control plan per MUTCD / WATCH Manual (added or deleted as needed) Traffic control set-up during potholing
Mobilization/Coordination/Dig-Alert Marking/Encroachment permit processing/Reports The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
790
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 5/21/2025

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 0.00 = $ 0.00 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 0.00 + = $ 0.00 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 0.00 + = $ 0.00 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 0.00 + = $ 0.00 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 0.00 + = $ 0.00 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 0.0
Year 1 $ 0.00 * = $ 0.00 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 0.00 * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 0.00 * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 0.00 * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 $ - * = $ - Estimated Hours Year 5 = $ 0.00
= $ 0.00
= $ - Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).

This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 5%

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal

0.0 0.0
Cost per Year
SafeProbe

CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES

0.0 Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
0 2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
0 0
0 0
0 Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)

0.0 Total

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%

0.0 5%
5%
791
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Name: Mauro Poyaoan Title *: Vice President
Signature: Date of Certification: 5/21/2025
Email: [email protected] Phone number: 213-251-5960 Address: 9608 Van Nuys Blvd, Suite 206, Panorama City, CA 91402 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Certification of Direct Costs:

Engineering Services
792
Cost Proposal 1
Cost Plus Fixed Fee or Lump Sum
Prime Consultant Subconsultant 2nd Tier Subconsultant Consultant: Vandermost Consulting Services, Inc. dba VCS Environmental Project No. Contract No. Date 7/18/2025
Range Hours Actual
Hourly Rate Total
President $105-$120 5 $109.52 547.60 $
Vice President $75-$90 53 $79.33 4,204.41 $
Director, Environmental Services $65-$75 134 $69.71 9,341.50 $ Project Manager II $35-$45 363 $40.38 14,658.41 $
Production Manger $45-$55 10 $45.43 454.29 $
Project Coordinator $25-$35 24 $29.68 712.32 $
Senior Project Manager III $45-$55 $50.00 - $
Office Assistant $35-$45 2 $37.86 75.72 $

LABOR COSTS
29,994.25$
c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] 29,994.25$

INDIRECT COSTS

66.29% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] 19,883.19 $

87.27% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] 26,176.01 $
) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] - $
j) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS [(e) + (g) + (i)] 46,059.20$
FIXED FEE k) TOTAL FIXED FEE [(c) + (j)] x fixed fee: 10% 7,605.35$ l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
429 0.70 $ 300.00$
-$
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS 300.00$
m) SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS' COSTS - $
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l) + (m)] 300.00$ TOTAL COST [(c) + (j) + (k) + (n)] 83,958.80$
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany. a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) d) Fringe Benefits (Rate:
f) Overhead & G&A (Rate:
h) General & Admin (Rate:

Subconsultant 1:

Subconsultant 2:

Description of Item
Mileage
The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

I-215/Keller Interchange

DIRECT LABOR
Classification/Title Name
Eric Turner
Joel Martinez
Linda Bo
Ana Canning/Alex Bicknell
Willa Sumer
Brianna Granados
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Julie Beeman
Wade Caffrey
Docusign Envelope ID: 06E444AA-CEA0-416B-8126-D482FED38830 793
Consultant
Project No. Contract No. Date 7/18/2025

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$ 29,994.25 = $ 50.75 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $ 50.75 + = $ 53.29 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate Year 2 $ 53.29 + = $ 55.95 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate Year 3 $ 55.95 + = $ 58.75 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate Year 4 $ 58.75 + = $ 61.69 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 591.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 591.0
Year 1 $ 50.75 *= $ 29,994.25 Estimated Hours Year 1 Year 2 $ 53.29 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 2 Year 3 $ 55.95 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 3 Year 4 $ 58.75 *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 4 Year 5 $ - *= $ - Estimated Hours Year 5 = $ 29,994.25
= $ 29,994.25
= $ - Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:

1. 2.

3. 4. Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year.

An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology).

This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted.

Vandermost Consulting Services, Inc. dba VCS Environmental 5%
I-215/Keller Interchange

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
591.0
591.0
Cost per Year

CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES
591.0
Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
591

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
591
0 0
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
(calculated above) (calculated above)
591.0
Total

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 5%
591.0
5%
5%
Docusign Envelope ID: 06E444AA-CEA0-416B-8126-D482FED38830 794
I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Proceedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

6. 48 Ccode of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements. Costs that are noncompliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate(s).

Name: Julie Beeman Title *: President
Signature: Date of Certification: 7/18/2025
Email:
[email protected] Phone number: 949-234-6070 Address: 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Certification of Direct Costs:
* An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant's or subconsultant's organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

Regulatory Permitting and Biological Services
Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Docusign Envelope ID: 06E444AA-CEA0-416B-8126-D482FED38830 795

01375.0006 2025866.1
EXHIBIT “D”

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE

I. Consultant shall perform Services as set forth in Exhibit A.

II. Consultant shall deliver the following tangible work products to the City by the following dates.

Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD) by Spring 2026; PS&E Submittal (100%) by Spring 2026; Environmental Permitting by Summer 2026, and Construction Advertising by Winter of 2026.

III. The Department Contact may approve extensions for performance of the Services in accordance with Section 3.2.

796

01375.0006 2025866.1
EXHIBIT “E”

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS

Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE

Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non- owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees)

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance appropriates to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

5. Cyber: Vendor/Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for security breaches, system failures, injuries to persons, damages to software, or damages to property (including computer equipment) which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Vendor, its agents, representatives, or employees. Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance claims arising out of their services and including, but not limited to loss, damage, theft or other misuse of data, infringement of intellectual property, invasion of privacy and breach of data.

Cyber Liability Insurance, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Vendor in this agreement and shall include, 797

01375.0006 2025866.1
but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses.

6. Technology Professional Liability Errors & Omissions (Only if vendor is providing a technology service (data storage, website designers, etc.,) or product (software providers)
Technology Professional Liability Errors and Omissions Insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession and work hereunder, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by the Vendor in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses.

a. The Policy shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information “property” of the Agency in the care, custody, or control of the Vendor.

If the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

Additional Insured Status
The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used).

798

01375.0006 2025866.1
Primary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non-contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies.

Umbrella or Excess Policy
The Consultant may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non-contributory, additional insured, Self-Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the Consultant’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.

Notice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

Waiver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subject to a self-insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 [fill in the amount for your comfort level for the specific Consultant and job – it could be much higher, or in the case of a very small Consultant, you might want it lower] unless approved in writing by City. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City may deduct from any amounts otherwise due Consultant to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self-insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, 799

01375.0006 2025866.1
including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

Claims Made Policies (note – should be applicable only to professional liability, see below) If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences.

However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

800

01375.0006 2025866.1
Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

801
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVEOFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDLSUBRLTR INSDWVD
PRODUCER CONTACTNAME: FAXPHONE(A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext):E-MAILADDRESS:INSURER A :INSURED INSURER B :INSURER C :INSURER D :INSURER E :INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBERPOLICY EFFPOLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCELIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)(MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIABEXCESS LIABWORKERS COMPENSATIONAND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE$DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADEOCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence)MED EXP (Any one person)$PERSONAL & ADV INJURY$GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:GENERAL AGGREGATE$PRO-POLICYLOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT OTHER: $COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT$(Ea accident)ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person)$OWNEDSCHEDULEDBODILY INJURY (Per accident)$AUTOS ONLYAUTOSHIREDNON-OWNEDPROPERTY DAMAGE$AUTOS ONLYAUTOS ONLY(Per accident)$OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCECLAIMS-MADEAGGREGATE$DEDRETENTION$ PEROTH-STATUTEERE.L. EACH ACCIDENTE.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE$If yes, describe underE.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGENAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / NN / A(Mandatory in NH)
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORETHE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED INACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIODINDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THISCERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THISCERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIESBELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZEDREPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement onthis certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGESCERTIFICATE NUMBER:REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDERCANCELLATION
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03)

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEDATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$$$$
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
7/16/2025
License # 0E67768(925) 918-453520443Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.2833 Junction Avenue, Ste 110San Jose, CA 951343528920508NA A 1,000,000XX70401850599/15/20249/15/20251,000,00015,0001,000,0002,000,0002,000,0001,000,000A XX70401839129/15/20249/15/20259,000,000B 70402832349/15/20249/15/20259,000,000C X7402748259/15/20249/15/20251,000,0001,000,0001,000,000DCyber LiabilityACS12843247/1/20249/15/2025Limit5,000,000I-215/Keller Road Interchange, CIP No. 8449City of Murrieta, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers are included as additional insured.The Workers Compensation / Employers Liability Deductible is none.

City of Murrieta1 Town SquareMurrieta, CA 92562
MARKTHO-01SEITAS
IOA Insurance Services3875 Hopyard RoadSuite 200Pleasanton, CA 94588Jessica [email protected] Casualty CompanyThe Continental Insurance CompanyValley Forge Insurance CompanyLloyd's X

X XXXX X
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
CA Policy # 7 40274825All Other States Policy # 7040185157 809

01375.0006 2025866.1
EXHIBIT “F”

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS

Federal law requires that agreements between non-federal recipients of federal awards (including local jurisdictions receiving federal grants) and transferees (subrecipients and contractors) include certain statutory or regulatory language. Most of these requirements are included at 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix II. The following are incorporated into this Agreement as if set forth in full above.

Debarment and suspension . If the Contract Sum exceeds $25,000, the parties shall comply with debarment and suspension regulations set forth in 2 CFR Part 200, Appendix II (H). When applicable, a contract award must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM). A SAM exclusion contains the names of parties debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority.

Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act . If the Contract Sum exceeds $150,000, the Contractor/Consultant shall comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q, and the Clean Water Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387.

Byrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment . If the Contract Sum exceeds $100,000, Contractor/Consultant must file, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 1352, the required certification relating to prohibitions on the use of federal funds to influence agency staff and congressional staff in connection with obtaining a covered federal award.

Prohibition on certain telecommunications and video surveillance services or equipment. Contractor/Consultant is prohibited from, among other things, entering into a contract to procure or obtain equipment, services or systems that use equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities) as a substantial or essential component of any system or as critical technology as part of any system, pursuant to 2 C.F.R. § 200.216. This section also includes restrictions on video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (and 31 C.F.R. Part 22) (Title VI). Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d et seq., Contractor/Consultant is required to abide by the policy and procedures codified at 22 C.F.R. Part 141, which stipulates that no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.

Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 . Contractor/Consultant shall abide by Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. This law prohibits federal contractors and subcontractors from discriminating in employment against individuals with disabilities and 810

01375.0006 2025866.1
requires that employers take affirmative action to recruit, hire, promote and retain these individuals.

Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (and 31 C.F.R. Part 23) . Contractor/Consultant shall comply with the Age Discrimination Act of 1975. This law prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance.

If the Scope of Work in Exhibit “A” contains any construction work, the following are incorporated herein:

Equal employment opportunity. During the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows:

(1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to e mployees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided by the contracting officer setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.

(2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.

(3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an in vestigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information.

(4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or wor kers' representative of the contractor's commitments under section 202 of Executive Order 811

01375.0006 2025866.1
11246 of September 24, 1965, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

(5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.

(6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by the rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the contracting agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.

(7) In the event of the contractor's non -compliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of such rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.

(8) The contractor will include the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as may be directed by the Secretary of Labor as a means of enforcing such provis ions including sanctions for noncompliance: Provided, however, that in the event the contractor becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction, the contractor may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

Davis-Bacon Act. Contractor shall comply with the Davis-Bacon Act, 40 U.S.C. §§ 3141- 3148 in addition to any California prevailing wage laws in effect.

Copeland “Anti -Kickback” Act . Contractor shall comply with the Copeland “Anti - Kickback” Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3145, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations at 29 C.F.R. Part 3.

Build America, Buy America Act provisions . The Build America, Buy America Act requires that iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in applicable federally funded infrastructure projects be produced in the United States.

Contractor shall comply with the requirements of the Build America, Buy America Act.

812

01375.0006 2025866.1
For contracts that employ mechanics or laborers:

Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act . Where applicable under 40 U.S.C. § 3701, and if the Contract Sum is in excess of $100,000 and the Scope of Work in Exhibit “A” includes the employment of mechanics or laborers, Contractor/Consultant shall comply with 40 U.S.C. §§ 3702 and 3704, as stated by Department of Labor regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 5.5 (b)(1)-(4).

For funding agreements involving research work:

Rights to inventions made under a contract or agreement . If the federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 C.F.R. Part 401.2(a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, a ssignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 C.F.R. Part 401.

813

01375.0006 2025866.1
EXHIBIT “G”

CALTRANS EXHIBIT 10-O2 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT

814
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-O2
Consultant Contract DBE Commitment

1. Local Agency: 2. Contract DBE Goal

3. Proj
ect Description:

4. Proj
ect Location:

5. Consultant's Name:

6. Prime Certified DBE 7. Total Contract Aw
ard Amount: $1,837,160.59

8. Total Dollar Amount for AL
L Subconsultants: 9. Total Number of AL
L Subconsultants: 4

13. DBE
Dollar
Amount
$228,612.38
$106,335.66
$45,940.00
$83,958.80
$0.00
$0.00

20. Local Agency
Contract Number:

21. Federal-Aid Proj
ect Number:

22. Contract Execution Date:
7/18/2025

24. Date 16. Date
(916) 390-5131

26. Phone 18. Phone
DISTRIBUTION:

1. Original – Local Agency
ADA Notice:

Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

EXHIBIT 10-O2 CONSULTANT CONTRACT DBE COMMITMENT
City of Murrieta 22%
I-215/Keller Road Interchange PS&E
I-215 PM R14.10 to PM R15.26
$464,846.84

10. Description of W
ork, Service, or Materials
Supplied

11. DBE
Certification
Number

12. DBE Contact Information
Geotechnical EngineeringLaboratory
Testing 4369
Earth Mechanics, Inc
17800 Newhope St., Suite B
Fountain Valley, CA 92708
714-751-3826
Engineering Services 3013
LIN Consulting, Inc
21600 Copley Dr, Suite 270
Diamond Bar, CA 91765
909-396-6850
Engineering Services 37109
Safeprobe, Inc
9608 Van Nuys Blvd., Suite 206
Panorama City, CA 91402
213-251-5960

Consulting ServicesRegulatory Permitting & Biolo 40141
VCS Environmental
30900 Rancho Viejo Rd., #100
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675-1762
949-234-6070
$464,846.84

25.30%
Local Agency to Complete this Section

14. TOTA

L CLAIMED DBE PARTICIPATION
Local Agency certifies that all DBE certifications are valid and information on this form is complete and accurate.

IMPORTANT: Identify all DBE firms being claimed for credit, regardless of tier. Written confirmation of each listed DBE is required.

23. Local Agency
Representative's Signature 15. Preparer's Signature

2. Copy
– Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE). Failure to submit to DLAE within 30 days of contract execution may result in de-obligation of federal funds on contract.

For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in alternate formats. For information call (916) 654-6410 or TDD (916) 654- 3880 or write Records and Forms Management, 1120 N Street, MS-89, Sacramento, CA 95814.

Zachary Siviglia

25. Local Agency
Representative's Name 17. Preparer's Name
President/CEO

27. Local Agency
Representative's Title 19. Preparer's Title

Page 1 of 1 ends

July 23, 2015815

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brian Crawford, Municipal Services Director
PREPARED BY: Brian Crawford, Municipal Services Director SUBJECT:

Murrieta Children's Library Expansion Project Financing, Award of Construction Contract, Amendment of the Architect’s Contract, and Authorization for Project Management Services

RECOMMENDATION
Amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating and Capital Improvement Plan budgets to provide an additional budget appropriation for Capital Improvement Project No. 21027 as detailed in the fiscal impact statement; and
Appropriate $3,500,000, from the Measure T Sustainability Reserve Account; Adopt Resolution No. 25-4884 entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Murrieta, California, to Approve an Interfund Loan up to $3,500,000, from the Measure T Fund to the Library Development Impact Fee Fund to Partially Fund the Children’s Library Expansion Project (CIP 21027); Approve a Second Amendment and Change Order to Purchase Order P03681, SVA Architects, Inc., in the amount of $55,603, for architectural design services and out-of-scope work; Award the construction contract for the Murrieta Children's Library Expansion, Capital Improvement Project No. 21027, to the lowest responsible bidder, R.C. Construction, in the amount of $5,188,600, plus a 15% contingency; and
Authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On June 6, 2023, the City Council approved and authorized the City Manager to execute an Agreement with SVA Architects, Inc., for architectural design services for the Murrieta Public Library Expansion Project in the amount of $302,300 (Vote: 4-0-1).

On May 7, 2024, the City Council approved Agreements for On-Call Vertical Construction/Project Management Consulting Services between the City of Murrieta and RWBID Construction Management LLC, Griffin Structures, and Transtech Engineering (Vote: 5-0).

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 8
powered by Legistar™
816
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.

On June 18, 2024, the City Council approved moving forward to the next phase of project design for the Murrieta Children’sLibrary Expansion; approved a recommended project financing strategy, including the use of an interfund loan, grant funds, already established Development Impact Fees, and donations; authorized the City Manager to approve a change order for $222,700 to SVA Architects, Inc., for the next phase of design services; and approved a purchase order for $475,000 to RWBID Construction Management, LLC, for project and construction management services (Vote: 4-0-1).

On June 3, 2025, a Joint Resolution was adopted by the City Council and the Boards of Directors of the Murrieta Library District, Murrieta Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Murrieta Redevelopment Agency, and Murrieta Housing Authority, approving the Operating Budget for Fiscal Years 2025/26 and 2026/27. Resolution Nos. 25-4837, MLB 25-201; CSD 25-285, RSA 25-35, MHA 25-45 (Vote: 5- 0).

On June 3, 2025, a Joint Resolution was adopted by the City Council and the Boards of Directors of the Murrieta Library District, Murrieta Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Murrieta Redevelopment Agency, Approving the Capital Improvement Plan Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26, Approving the Fiscal Years 2025/26 to 2029/30 Capital Improvement Plan. Resolution Nos. 25-4836, MLB 25-200, CSD 25-284, RSA 25-34 (Vote: 5-0).

CITY COUNCIL GOAL
Coordinate and deliver responsive, effective community services.

DISCUSSION
The Murrieta Public Library (Library) fulfills a wide array of purposes for the community, all based on encouraging the love of reading and lifelong learning. Through the Library and its collections, services, technology, and programs, children of all ages have an excellent environment to meet, study, and learn about the world in a non-academic setting. It is where adults can expand their skills and find the answers and resources to resolve personal and professional dilemmas. The Library is where community members can gather formally and informally for cultural events and workshops or to share stories. It is a place where positive memories are created and where the foundation of a culturally, educationally, and economically developed community is successfully established.

The Library, constructed in 2007, does not currently have the space and facilities to adequately meet the increased community needs stemming from the City's increased population, with current programming over 100% of the attendance levels in 2007. The existing children's area is only 2,700 square feet (sf) and does not have a space dedicated to story time or children's specific programming. The Library's multipurpose community room is used for meetings, events, and adult and children's programming needs.

In March 2022, the California State Library (CSL) released the Building Forward Infrastructure Grant Program (Grant) that supports California's public libraries for capital projects addressing critical maintenance needs, improving energy efficiency and sustainability, and expanding access digitally and physically. Library staff applied to fund an expansion of the children's area and a new story time space, and the CSL approved a grant award for $1,505,625, with City matching funds for $752,813. The funding award was the catalyst for beginning the process to expand the Library's children's section.

The planning and design for the Murrieta Children's Library Expansion Project (Project) has been in progress since July 2023. City staff, along with the design team from SVA Architects, have worked closely with community stakeholders, including members of the Murrieta Library Foundation, the Friends of the Murrieta CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 2 of 8
powered by Legistar™
817
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.
community stakeholders, including members of the Murrieta Library Foundation, the Friends of the Murrieta Library, parents, and library staff, to plan a modest expansion that will meet the community's needs for the future. The team went through several rounds of value engineering, including reducing the size of the expansion and replacing some design elements with more budget-conscious solutions, to ensure the Project fit within a reasonable budget.

The result is a creative 4,500 square foot expansion space incorporating a multipurpose Storytime room that can be split into two separate spaces, a roomy area for book stacks, restrooms, staff offices, and storage. The plans also call for remodeling the existing children's library space to transform it into an engaging section for tweens. Lastly, the Carol Carson Garden of Verses outdoor space on the north end of the Library will be expanded, and features will be added to activate the space for a variety of exciting, year-round programming.

Attachment 5 includes images of the floorplan for the expansion, as well as renderings of the interior, exterior, and garden.

On June 18, 2024, staff reviewed with the City Council the various design concepts as well as the cost estimates and proposed financial strategy to proceed. Based on City Council direction at that time, staff advanced to the next phase of detailed design to prepare for the construction bid process based on the selected design.

The team recently completed the plans, specifications, and final bid documents for the Project. On June 13, 2025, a bid opportunity was published on PlanetBids and was also publicly advertised twice in a regional newspaper on June 18, 2025, and again on June 28, 2025. A total of eight construction bids were received:

Contractor Bid
R.C. Construction Services $5,188,600
Bilbro Construction Company, Inc $5,431,000
OptimaRPM $5,455,304
R2BUILD $5,567,400
Spec Construction Co Inc $5,583,000
PCN3INC $5,997,000
KYA Services, LLC $6,451,671
Newman Midland Corp. $8,671,353
The bids were reviewed, and the item prices were determined to be consistent with today's construction market.

Contractors were required to provide two alternative bid items. The first was a deductive bid item for replacing the specified interior architectural lighting on the ceiling of the book stacks area with standard lighting. The second was an additive bid item to replace the specified floor carpeting with upgraded carpeting that is easier to maintain and is expected to have a longer life span. The above bid amounts assume the City will retain the specified architectural lighting and upgrade the carpeting.

Staff recommends that the contract be awarded to the lowest responsive bidder, R.C. Construction Services, for $5,188,600, plus a fifteen percent (15%) contingency of $778,290, for a total contract amount of $5,966,890.

No bid protests were received for the Project.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 3 of 8
powered by Legistar™
818
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.

Project Budget
In June 2024, staff presented the City Council with an estimated all-in Project budget (including hard costs, like construction expenses, and soft costs, like design, project management, furnishings, and permitting) of $7,053,000 based on a comprehensive construction estimate conducted at the time. These estimates were an educated guess based on the real bid results of hundreds of other regional projects. Making estimation even more difficult was uncertainty in the construction sector pricing, driven by inflation and possible tariffs on critical construction materials. A more recent estimate, conducted in March 2025, put the all-in budget for the Project at almost $9 million. Fortunately, the construction bids came in lower than expected, and the resulting all-in budget is just over $8 million.

It is important to note that the budget includes a 15% contingency on the value of the construction contract, which is considered industry standard and amounts to $778,290. This amount is requested to be committed to the Project for any unforeseen circumstances that may arise during construction. However, if only minimal issues are encountered, then the entire contingency amount may not be spent.

Item Amount
Construction $5,188,600
Construction Contingency (15%) 778,290
Inspection Services 98,000
Architectural Design Services (SVA) 580,603
Project/Construction Management, Labor Compliance (RWBID) 375,000 Water/Wastewater Capacity Fees (estimated) 50,000
Moving/Storage of Books & Materials 25,000
Fixtures, Furnishings & Equipment (Jan 2026) 620,000
Low Voltage/IT Services (Mar 2026) 300,000
Total $8,015,493
Now that the actual construction cost is known, some adjustments need to be made to the fees negotiated with the City's design team, SVA Architects (SVA). A sliding scale fee was negotiated with SVA, which means their design service fees decrease as construction costs increase. A purchase order for $302,300 was initially issued to SVA in June 2023 and was based solely on the amount of funding the City had for the Project at the time, which was $2,250,000. In June 2024, SVA presented an estimate for construction based on a cost estimate developed during the schematic design phase, and the City agreed to a reconciliation of the fee and issued a change order increasing the fee for services to $500,000. The change order also included additional funding for out-of-scope survey work and reworking the schematic design after the City decided to reduce the square footage of the expansion, totaling $25,000. Now that the construction cost is known, an additional reconciliation change order is needed to increase the total fee to $544,803, or 10.5% of construction costs, plus an additional out-of-scope task for $10,800 for additional topography work, bringing the total agreement amount to $580,603, a portion of which has already been expended to get to this point of the project. A Second Amendment to the SVA agreement is needed to authorize these services and costs.

RWBID Construction Management (RWBID) has provided pre-construction project management services for the Project since June 2024. RWBID was selected through a Request for Proposals process in 2023-2024 and awarded a contract for on-call vertical construction management services. In June 2024, RWBID presented a CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 4 of 8
powered by Legistar™
819
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.
awarded a contract for on-call vertical construction management services. In June 2024, RWBID presented a proposal for the library expansion project with not-to-exceed fees of $475,000, divided into pre-construction and construction phases, and the City Council approved the full expenditure. The City issued a purchase order (PO) for only pre-construction services for $215,000. Approximately $90,000 remains in the PO, which will be closed and the funds disencumbered. RWBID will be issued a new PO for construction management services during the construction phase for $250,000. At the conclusion of construction, the total value of RWBID’s services for the entire project is anticipated to be $375,000.

Funding for some Project costs will not be needed until a later date. The purchase of Fixtures, Furnishings, and Equipment (FF&E) for bookcases, seating, desks, and staff workstations can wait until winter 2026, depending on order lead times. Low-voltage wiring and information technology-related services will not be needed until the building expansion is almost entirely constructed and includes installing low-voltage wiring and data cabling for key card access points, Wi-Fi access points, data connections for workstations, and security cameras. Staff will bring those purchase and service contracts to the City Council for consideration at a later date. The anticipated cost for these elements is included in the full project budget, reflected in the table above.

Fundraising
In addition to securing funding through grants, development impact fees, and an interfund loan, the City has been working with numerous supporting groups, including the Murrieta Public Library Foundation and the Friends of the Murrieta Library, to raise awareness of the Children’sExpansion project and to raise funds.

These efforts aim to enhance the Project’sscope, reduce reliance on City funds, and foster deeper community engagement. The fundraising strategy developed by staff and the supporting groups aimed to raise between $550,000 to $1.5 million. Over the course of the past year, outreach efforts have included staffing booths at 13 local events, presentations to local community groups (approximately 10), social media, a project newsletter, direct solicitation, and school partnerships. As of the beginning of August, the fundraising campaign has achieved the following:

Source Amount Raised
Murrieta Public Library Foundation $135,000
Friends of the Murrieta Library $103,400
Pending private sector commitments $ 40,000
Water district support (including in-kind contributions and lawn removal rebate)
$110,000
TOTAL COMMITMENTS $388,400
Staff and the Foundation continue to fundraise for the Children’sLibrary Expansion project and will provide up- to-date donation figures when staff returns to the City Council to seek approval for contracts related to the FF&E and Low Voltage/IT Services.

Project Funding
A portion of the funding required to proceed with the construction of the Murrieta Children’sLibrary Expansion Project has already been allocated to CIP 21027 during the Capital Improvement Plan budgeting process, and previous City Council actions:

Funding Source Amount
California State Library Building Forward Grant $1,505,625 Grant Matching Funds from Library Development Impact
Fees (DIF)
752,813
Additional Library DIF 802,300
Interfund Loan 3,500,000
Donation Commitments 388,400
Subtotal $6,944,326
Estimated Additional Funding Required
Measure T Unassigned Funds 1,075,000
Total $8,019,326
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 5 of 8
powered by Legistar™
820
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.

Funding Source Amount
California State Library Building Forward Grant $1,505,625 Grant Matching Funds from Library Development Impact
Fees (DIF)
752,813
Additional Library DIF 802,300
Interfund Loan 3,500,000
Donation Commitments 388,400
Subtotal $6,944,326
Estimated Additional Funding Required
Measure T Unassigned Funds 1,075,000
Total $8,019,326
To provide the remaining funding for the Project, staff is recommending an Interfund Loan between the Measure T Fund and the Library DIF Fund, and a budget appropriation from Unassigned Fund Balance from the Measure T Fund.

On June 18, 2024, staff presented the City Council with a comparison of options to fund a part of the Project.

The first option was issuing bonds, and the second was an interfund loan. Both would be repaid using future Library DIF. At that time, the City Council conceptually approved using the interfund loan approach.

Alternatively, if the City Council had preferred to issue debt and pursue a bond for the necessary funds, staff would have pursued that over the course of the past 14 months due to the required lead time.

Bond Analysis
As of July 2025, the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee has maintained the federal funds rate within a target range of 4.25% to 4.50%. Given current bond market conditions, the estimated average interest rate for a 30-year lease revenue bond is expected to fall within the range of 5.00% to 5.50%.

These elevated market rates are driving higher interest costs, which in turn increase both the total interest expense and the annual debt service payments. Based on a 30-year lease revenue bond with an average annual interest rate of 5.00%, the estimated annual debt service payment would be approximately $227,680, with total interest paid over the life of the bond amounting to roughly $3,330,400.

Interfund Loan Analysis
Interfund loans are a common financial tool used by local government agencies. These loans should provide a reasonable benefit to the lending fund without creating a financial burden for the borrowing fund.

Under the proposed loan terms, the borrowing fund would benefit from an interest rate lower than what would typically be available through public bond financing. The loan interest rate is generally aligned with the City's long-term investment yield-what the lending fund would have earned had the funds remained invested. As of June 30, 2025, the average purchase yield on the City's long-term investment portfolio is approximately 2.0%.

Considering the annual average revenue from Library DIF, staff recommends setting the Interfund Loan interest rate at 1.0%. At this rate, the Library DIF Fund would realize an estimated $2,761,848 in interest expense savings over a 30-year period, compared to a standard bond issuance.

The opportunity cost to the Measure T Fund-resulting from investing $3.5 million at 1% instead of the typical CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 6 of 8
powered by Legistar™
821
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.

The opportunity cost to the Measure T Fund-resulting from investing $3.5 million at 1% instead of the typical 2%-is approximately $1,621,375 over the same 30-year term. When factoring in the interest savings for the Library DIF Fund and the opportunity cost to the Measure T Fund, the combined net benefit of the proposed loan is approximately $1,140,473, as detailed in the table below. 30-Years Bond 3,330,400.00
Interfund Loan 568,552.00
Interest Savings 2,761,848.00
Measure T Fund
Opportunity Cost 1,621,375.00
Net Benefit 1,140,473.00
Library DIF Interest Expense
The term of the Interfund Loan will align with a standard 30-year bond, with an estimated annual debt service payment of $135,618. The Library DIF Fund generates revenue to support this level of debt service.

Based on this analysis, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution authorizing execution of an Interfund Loan agreement. The agreement includes key terms such as the loan amount, interest rate, and the debt service payment schedule.

Next Steps
If the City Council approves moving forward, construction is expected to begin in September 2025 and will take approximately 12 months. A groundbreaking celebration will be scheduled for early September. The goal will be to minimize disruption to regular library operations and programming as much as possible, though it is anticipated that some adjustments will be required.

FISCAL IMPACT
The proposed $3,500,000 Interfund Loan will require a budget appropriation in the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budget to establish a transfer-out from the Measure T Fund-utilizing funds set aside in the Sustainability Reserves for this purpose-and a corresponding transfer-in to the Library DIF Fund.

A budget appropriation of $1,075,000 from the Measure T Unassigned Fund Balance is required for the balance of the funding necessary to construct the Project. If, during a future project update, donation collections are greater than the current amount, the budget appropriation from Measure T can be reduced and returned to Unassigned Fund Balance.

The Interfund Loan will be recorded in the General Ledger in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Associated financial impacts, including investment earnings for the Measure T Fund and interest expense for the Library DIF Fund, will be included in a future budget update and incorporated into future biennial operating budgets for the term of the loan. Additionally, the terms of the Interfund Loan will be disclosed in the Notes section of City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report.

ATTACHMENTS

1. R.C. Construction Agreement and Bid Proposal

2. SVA Architects Amendment Proposal
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 7 of 8
powered by Legistar™
822
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 23.

3. RWBID Construction Management Proposal

4. Resolution No. 25-4884

5. Images of Library Expansion Floor Plan, Interior, Exterior, and Garden CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 8 of 8
powered by Legistar™
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A :

NAIC #
NAME:

CONTACT
(A/C, No):

FAX
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext):

PHONE

INSURED
REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR
WVD
ADDL
INSD

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $
$
$PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person)

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOSAUTOS ONLY

NON-OWNED

SCHEDULEDOWNED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
ER
OTH-

STATUTE
PER

LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EFF

POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR
INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE
$AGGREGATE
$
OCCUR

CLAIMS-MADE
DED RETENTION $
$PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$GENERAL AGGREGATE
$PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$MED EXP (Any one person)
$EACH OCCURRENCE

DAMAGE TO RENTED
$PREMISES (Ea occurrence)

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

POLICY PRO-

JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
8/5/2025
Sequel Insurance Services
111 Scripps Drive
Sacramento CA 95825
279-202-3979
279-688-0001
[email protected]
License#: 6010509
Zurich American Insurance Company
16535
ROBECLA-01
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
25674
Robert Clapper Construction Services, Inc.

DBA: R.C. Construction Services, Inc.
700 New York Street
Redlands CA 92374
RSUI Indemnity Company
22314
910215123
A
X
2,000,000
X
1,000,000
10,000
2,000,000
4,000,000
X
Y
GLO 0381535-10
7/1/2025
7/1/2026
4,000,000
A
2,000,000
X
Y
BAP 0381536-10
7/1/2025
7/1/2026
B
X
5,000,000
X
CUP-9W13830A-25-NF
7/1/2025
7/1/2026
5,000,000
A
X
Y
WC 0381534-10
7/1/2025
7/1/2026
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
B
C
Installation Floater
Excess Liability - Tier 2
630-9T262146
LHA607397
7/1/2025
7/1/2025
7/1/2026
7/1/2026
Limit At Any One Loc.

Deductible
Limit
250,000
1,000
5,000,000
RE: CITY PROJECT NO. 23-458/CIP 21027; MURRIETA CHILDREN’S LIBRARY EXPANSION; 700 New York St, Redlands, CA 92374 CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are General Liability Additional Insureds per terms and conditions of the attached endorsement(s).

Primary Wording for General Liability applies per terms and conditions of the attached endorsement. Auto Liability Additional Insured applies per terms and conditions of the attached endorsement. Primary Wording for Auto Liability applies per terms and conditions of the attached endorsement. Workers Compensation Waiver of Subrogation applies per terms and conditions of the attached endorsement.

City of Murrieta
1 Town Square
Murrieta, CA 92562
857
07/01/2025
07/01/2025
07/01/2026
BAP 0381536-10
858
859
860
861
862
863
07/01/2025
GLO 0381535-10
864
865
866
867
WC 0381534-10
868

01375.0023 2030481.3

AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH

THE CITY OF MURRIETA AND CONSULTANT

Amendment No.: 2nd Amendment
Original Agreement Title (“Agreement”): AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MURRIETA AND SVA ARCHITECTS, INC.

Agreement Effective Date: June 6, 2023
Agreement Termination Date: June 6, 2026
Consultant Name: SVA Architects, Inc.

Brief Description of Scope of Services (“Services”) under the original agreement : Consultant is providing architectural design services for the Murrieta Library Expansion Project. In order for successful project completion, various tasks are implemented in phases to meet City’s project expectation.

Task 1: Preliminary Design/Concept Planning
Consultant will conduct an initial meeting with City staff, facilities team, and other stakeholders to review project objectives, tour existing library, and obtain and review any existing plans and documents relevant to the development of the projec t. Consultant will discuss organizational structure, time schedule, project budget, responsibilities and priorities.

Task 2: Schematic Design
Consultant will develop three concept designs based upon the results of Task 1. Associated cost estimates will be developed for these designs, and one concept will be selected to proceed.

Schematic site and floor plans, building elevations, building sectio ns, and preliminary landscape/parking plans will be prepared as well as schematic site studies.

Task 3: Design Development
Design development drawings, outline specifications, and preliminary engineering calculations and analysis will be performed to reflect various components including architectural, interiors, civil, electrical/mechanical, and specialty design. A second esti mate of construction costs will be developed.

Task 4: Contract Documents
The final design of the project will be coordinated and revised based upon the results of previous reviews. Engineering systems design will be finalized and completed. The design team will coordinate to handle construction contract contents of the project manual. Updated estimated of construction costs will be prepared.

Task 5: Permitting
Consultant will obtain permits for this project and ensure a smooth design development and construction documents process.

Task 6: FF&E Design, Procurement, and Installations
Consultant’s in-house Interiors Department will evaluate the existing furnishings, fixtures, and equipment to provide recommendations for reuse or replacement. Cons ultant will prepare 869

01375.0023 2030481.3
performance-based specification set.

Task 7: Bidding
Consultant will coordinate distribution to contractors, assistance with construction pre -bid conference, response to questions during the bidding phase. If necessary, the design team will make recommendations for award of the construction contract.

Task 8: Construction Consulting
Consultant will advise City of any deficiencies observed during construction and conduct both an administrative and physical review of the project status. Consultant will revie w and monitor the construction schedule as necessary and conduct site reviews. A detailed punch list will be created for each space, building component, or site element in a detailed manner by the design team and submitted to the contractor for correction and completion.

This Second Amendment to the Agreement, made effective on the date executed by the City by and between the City of Murrieta, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California ("City"), and the above referenced Consultant with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct:

RECITALS

Whereas, City is a general law city, formed and existing pursuant to the provisions of the California Government Code.

Whereas, City and Consultant entered into an Agreement on June 6, 2023 for the Services.

Whereas, the Agreement was previously modified by the following prior amendments: The Agreement authorized a sliding scale fee structure from Consultant to account for the increasing construction costs and decreasing design fees percentages based on a $2.25 million construction budget with compensation not to exceed $ 302,300. On June 18, 2024, the First Amendment to the Agreement was authorized by the City Council, based on a proposal from Consultant dated May 31, 2024, as the project’s scope grew to award additional compensation in the amount of $222,700 (a new total not to exceed $525 ,000) based on a construction budget that was increased to $4,545,454.55.

Whereas, as the City Council is concurrently awarding the construction contract for the project in the amount of $5,188,600, the City and Consultant wish to amend the Agreement as further set forth herein.

AMENDMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct.
870

01375.0023 2030481.3

2. The following terms of the Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows:

“3.1 The term of this Agreement shall be from 6/6/23 to 6/6/27.”

“4.1 Consideration. In consideration of the services to be performed by CONSULTANT for the CITY as set forth in Section 1, the CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT in accordance with the rates set forth in Exhibit “B”, attached hereto and incorporated herei n, a not -to-exceed contract sum of Five Hundred Eighty Thousand Six Hundred Three Dollars ($580,603). In the event that the construction budget for the Project changes from the initial contract award of $5,188,600, the parties agree to meet in good fai th to negotiate a revised not -to-exceed contract sum based on the increased construction budget and the hourly rates set forth in Exhibit “B” and subject to City Council approval.”

The Fee Schedule in Exhibit “B” is revised to reflect updated design fees reconciled as follows:

3. All other conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Second Amendment to the Agreement to be executed on the dates set forth below.

Signature Page to Follow.

871

01375.0023 2030481.3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF MURRIETA, a California municipal
corporation
By:

Cindy Warren, Mayor
ATTEST: Date:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP

Tiffany Israel, City Attorney
Date:

CONSULTANT:

SVA ARCHITECTS, INC., a California corporation

Two corporate officer signatures required when Contractor is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairperson of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. (Cal. Corp. Code § 313.) Appropriate attestations shall be included as may be required by the bylaws, articles of incorporation or other rules or regulations applicable to Contractor’s business City.

By:

Name: Robert M. Simons, AIA
Title: Partner and President
Date:

By:

Name: Ernesto M. Vasquez, FAIA
Title: CEO
Date:
872

AC BILBREW LIBRARY RENOVATION

LOS ANGELES, CA
MAY 27, 2024 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

CITY OF MURRIETA

PROJECT AND CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE

MURRIETA LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT
873

COVER LETTER
01 SECTION
Stoneview Nature Center

CULVER CITY, CA
874
1 May 27, 2024
Mr. Brian Crawford, Senior Program Manager
City of Murrieta
City Manager’s Office
1 Town Square
Murrieta, CA 92562
Re: Request for Proposals to Provide Construction/Project Management Services for the Murrieta Library Expansion Project
Dear Mr. Crawford:

RWBID Construction Management, LLC, a registered California Limited Liability Company, is pleased to submit our proposal to provide Construction/Project Management Services to the City of Murrieta for the Murrieta Library Expansion Project. RWBID has extensive experience managing similar public works projects of various project sizes and complexities. Because of our extensive experience providing on-call PM/CM services with other local public agencies, we are well positioned to provide you with the specialized skills and services needed to manage the demands and high expectations for today’s complicated projects. RWBID is a great fit for this work based on the following:

Exceptional Staff. We understand that providing professionally licensed staff is key to delivering your projects and programs. Our staff for this contract is led by the Principal In-Charge and Principal Project Manager that are both California licensed architects with decades of code analysis, design management, and project permitting experience. Our key staff for this project includes Tinka Rogic, a California licensed architect to lead the design management and pre-construction phase and Sal Manzella, a Certified Construction Manager (CCM) to lead the construction, closeout, and FF&E Move Management phases of the project. We have schedulers, estimators, and document control staff to provide Tinka and Sal the technical support required for a project of this complexity.

Relevant Project Experience. RWBID has extensive specialty experience delivering library renovation and addition projects for local public agencies. We have completed and are currently managing several relevant library projects in Southern California including the following projects:

RWBID

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT
139 Hermosa Avenue
Hermosa Beach, CA
90254
T 626.888.9411
www.rwbid.com
- El Monte Library Improvements ($4 Million)
- Rosemead Library Improvements ($3.5 Million)
- AC Bilbrew Library Refurbishment ($3.4 Million)
- Julian Dixon Library Renovations ($3.2 Million)
- San Gabriel Library Refurbishment ($3 Million)
- Pico Rivera Library Renovation ($3 Million)
- Compton Library Renovation ($2.2 Million)
- Gardena Library Renovation ($1.5 Million)
- View Park Library Refurbishment ($1 Million)
- Walnut Library Refurbishment ($1 Million)
- LA County Library Program Management for
Various Renovations ($3.5 Million)
We bring a deep understanding of delivering these projects to the City and our history of lessons learned will save the City from potential costly missteps.

Integrated Services. We can provide a range of comprehensive design- and construction-related services in-house for this project, including construction project management, master planning assistance, economic development planning and administration, finance management, resident

engineering, value engineering, constructability reviews, commissioning, and project controls management. Our depth of resources ensures that we will be able to address any of the City’s needs throughout the course of the project. The result is a successful team offering totally integrated services.
875
2 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
STEWARDS OF PUBLIC FUNDS. RWBID has worked with multiple public agencies to deliver grant funded projects, including projects that are federally funded, state funded, and locally funded. We are currently working on several infrastructure, Parks and Recreation, and housing projects locally that are funded by Metro Transit Oriented Development Planning Grant Program, No Place Like Home Program, State Proposition 68, State Proposition 1, Safe Clean Water Act Municipal Funds, LA County Proposition A, and LA County Vision Zero. Our Project Management and Construction Management staff will work closely with the City grant staff to ensure all the grant required scope of work is included with the project, quality inspection are made, reporting and photographic evidence are regularly provided, and timelines are met for reimbursement.

PRINCIPAL-LEVEL ATTENTION TO YOUR PROJECT. RWBID is uniquely able to provide principal- level involvement on this project. The firm’s Principal, Matthew Feldhaus, Architect, CCM, LEED AP
, will oversee the entire project team and respond to the needs of the City immediately as they come up. Because we are a professional business that only takes on the amount of work able to be effectively managed, we can provide the necessary services on a short notice. The testament to this approach is the amount of repeat business we receive from our Clients.

We believe that you will find the RWBID team extremely qualified for this project. We will work tirelessly to manage this project for the City using proven processes and deliver the project on time and under budget. As the authorized agent and primary contact representing the Company with authority to bind the firm by contract and all commitments for this project, I would like to thank you for this opportunity.

Sincerely,
Matthew Feldhaus, President
California Architect C-33265
RWBID Construction Management, LLC
(c) 562-477-7609
(e) [email protected]
876

TABLE OF CONTENTS
02 SECTION
Campus Kilpatrick

MALIBU, CA
877
3 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Section 1

COVER LETTER
Section 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS 3
4 4
5 7
8 Section 3

STAFFING AND ORGANIZATION
3A Proposed Staffing
3B Key Personnel
3C
Organizational Chart
3D Staff Resumes
17 17
Section 4

SCOPE OF SERVICES
4A Staff Responsibilities
19 19
20 Section 5

FEE PROPOSAL
5A Maximum Not-To-Exceed Fee
5B Resource Plan
878

STAFFING AND ORGANIZATION
03 SECTION
Julian Dixon Library Renovation

CULVER CITY, CA
879
4 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
3A PROPOSED STAFFING
Our approach to staffing City of Murrieta Library Expansion Project was simple, provide the staffing that the City already knows and is familiar with f
rom our recent interview, and
provide licensed professionals that are e
xperts in their field.

As a licensed California Architect, T
inka Rogic will lead the
intense re-design effort for the p
roject. She will look for every
opportunity to provide Value Engineering while still
maintaining all the critical s
cope items for the library.

Once construction starts, Sal Manzella, C
ertified Construction
Manager (CCM), will ensure the c
onstruction team follows the
contract documents and holds the contractors accountable to provide a safe and quality c
onstruction product.

Our support staff of schedulers, estimators, and document control technicians will provide Tinka and Sal the technical expertise required for a project o
f this complexity.

Finally, the team will have all the technical oversight and resources necessary through the Principal
level leadership of
Ryan Kristan. Ryan is a
licensed architect and a Project/
Construction Management expert with almost 15 years of
delivering similar public agency
projects. The firm Principal-
In-Charge, Matthew Feldhaus will also
provide project
oversight whenever necessary at no additional cost to the City.

The following chart and key
personnel description provides
insight into our core team providing services for the project, including education, relevant experience, and
professional
credentials for each key staff
member.
03 STAFFING AND ORGANIZATION

PROJECT TITLE KEY STAFF MEMBER

YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

PROFESSIONAL

CERTIFICATION/

LICENSE/

REGISTRATION EDUCATION

LIBRARIES
RENOVATION EXP.

LOW-BID CONSTRUCT.

FF&E MOVE MGMT
Principal-In-Charge Matthew Feldhaus 24 Architect, CCM, LEED AP M.Arch √ √ √ √
Principal Project Manager Ryan Kristan 19 Architect, LEED AP M.Arch √ √ √ √ Project Manager III Tinka Rogic 25 Architect,
LEED AP M.Arch √ √ √ √
Construction Manage r II Sal Manzella 25 CCM, LEED BD+C BS Construct Mgmt.
√ √ √ √
Scheduler II John Jacobs 25 BS Construct
Mgmt.
√ √ √ √
Estimator II Sam Shabani 10 MS Engineering √ √ √ √
Document Control II Christine Barcelon 18 BS Nutrition √ √ 880
5 3B KEY PERSONNEL
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE – MATTHEW FELDHAUS, ARCHITECT,

CCM, LEED AP
Matthew Feldhaus will be the Project Director, Program
Manager, and administrator of the RWBID staff for this
contract. He has 24 years of related design and construction management experience providing services for public and private clients. Matthew has proficiency in this role with multiple public agencies including the County of Los Angeles, the City of Pasadena, the City of Long Beach, the Port of Long Beach, and Los Angeles World Airports. He has managed
Capital Construction projects with values ranging from
$750,000 to $2 billion, including dozens of master planning and civic center projects on behalf of various local public agencies.

Matthew will be the primary point of contact for work
performed under this Agreement and he will provide an
excellent working relationship with the staff and management of the City. He will be responsible for overall contract performance and quality matters. He will be in charge of contract coordination, staff performance, and supervising subcontracted services as part of this scope of work.

Matthew is a licensed architect in the state of California, a Certified Construction Manager (CCM), and a LEED Accredited Professional. Matthew holds a Master’s degree from the
University of Southern California and a Bachelor’s degree from Lehigh University. In 2013, he launched a student
internship program in collaboration with the Construction Managers Association of America (CMAA) Southern
California Chapter and it has grown to provide internships and scholarships valued at over $300,000 per year with an aggregate total of $1.8 million awarded since 2013. He is a Past President of the CMAA Southern California chapter and the current President/Chair for the CMAA Southern California Charitable Foundation.

PRINCIPAL PROJECT MANAGER – RYAN KRISTAN,

ARCHITECT, LEED AP
Ryan has worked for RWBID since 2011 and he has managed some of the region’s most complex building projects. He has delivered projects using design-build, design-bid-build, JOC, and Public-Private-Partnership. Ryan is a licensed architect and brings a deep understanding of the built environment as he collaborates well with design consultants and contractors to deliver complicated public agency projects. Ryan is an expert at delivering parks and recreation, libraries, aquatic/ swimming pool projects, and community center projects for the firm.

Ryan will be responsible for training of staff and operations and technical oversight. Ryan is available as a resource to the Project and Construction Management teams and the City of Murrieta.

PROJECT MANAGER II – TINKA ROGIC, ARCHITECT, LEED AP
Tinka has 25 years of design and construction management experience with a focus on providing project management services for public clients, including the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Unified School District. She has managed projects with values ranging from $5 million to $200 million and has extensive experience collaborating with and managing architecture and engineering teams from the project definition phases through construction completion. Tinka has extensive experience managing and delivering library, parks and
recreation projects, and other relevant large community benefit projects.

As the day-to-day point of contact for work performed under this Agreement, Tinka will be committed to utmost client satisfaction. She will ensure that goals, quality expectations and deliverables are met at each stage of the project,
identifying potential risks and issues, and developing strategies to mitigate them. Tinka will be responsible for keeping budgets and timelines on track, while reporting regularly on progress to City staff, and coordinating with consultants, outside agencies, stakeholders, commissions, and other stakeholders.

Tinka is a licensed architect in California and a LEED
Accredited Professional (AP). She holds a Master's degree in Architecture from SCI-Arc in Los Angeles, CA.
881
6 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
PROJECT SCHEDULER II – JOHN JACOBS
John will provide scheduling services for the project and will be responsible for managing and monitoring the overall
construction schedule, and provide support for cost, change management, and risk controls. He has 25 years of project controls experience managing the planning/scheduling of design and construction projects, including significant experience planning libraries, parks and recreation projects, public works, fire, and public safety projects for local clients including LA County Public Works, the City of Manhattan Beach, LA Metro, and Los Angeles World Airports.

John will proactively identify project technical issues and schedule impacts for senior management to ensure remedial actions are promptly taken to avoid financial losses. He will help streamline the project by following strict industry standards and contracted terms and conditions. John will work with the Project/Construction Manager, contractor, and architect to continuously monitor and ensure that schedule complies with the actual work on-site, help them make critical decisions, and bring the project back on track in case of delays.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER II – SAL MANZELLA, CCM, LEED BD+C
Sal Manzella, CCM has over 25 years of experience providing project and construction m
anagement services to many large and
complex public and private owner organizations, including 10+ years delivering d
eferred maintenance and major renovation
projects for various LA County Departments. He is well versed in project delivery procedures f
or projects and programs and he has
delivered a diverse range of projects including libraries, pool/ aquatics projects, deferred m
aintenance projects, major
renovations, central plant u
pgrades, ADA improvements, and facility
master planning.

Sal is a
Certified Construction Manager (CCM) and a LEED Building Design and Construction (
BD+C) professional.

ESTIMATOR II –SAM SHABANI
Sam has over 10 years of cost estimating and cost control experience for public agencies and Owners in the construction industry. His skills include budgetary/conceptual estimates, hard bid and negotiated bid construction estimates, Fair Cost Estimates (FCE) for Change Orders, and various forms of project cost controls and construction administrative support.

Sam will provide part-time cost estimating to the project team throughout the life of the project. He will provide initial cost estimates to enable the City to secure appropriate project financing. During construction, Sam will analyze change order requests from the contractor to ensure fair pricing and accuracy in scope. He will track and analyze design and construction contract amendments to ensure budget reliance.

Sam will maintain and update the cost exposure/change order log throughout the project.

DOCUMENT CONTROL II – CHRISTINE BARCELON
Christine has an extensive background in providing all aspects of construction/project management support, administration, records management, closeout procedures, and facility
operations. She is a team player with comprehensive
experience in construction project management and
engineering support working on some of the largest projects in Southern California, including the $1.8 billion Harbor UCLA Master Plan project, Olive View Medical Center, and the $5 billion Inglewood LA Rams Stadium project. Christine has worked with many local public agencies including LA County, Southern California Gas, and LADWP. She has managed an
administrative and technical team of up to 8 staff.
882
7 1 - 1SECTION 0 SECTION NAME HERE

RWBID PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Matthew Feldhaus ARCHITECT, CCM, LEED AP

CONSTRUCTION MANAGER II
Sal Manzella CCM, LEED BD+C

PROJECT MANAGER III
Tinka Rogic ARCH, LEED AP

ESTIMATOR II
Sam Shabani

SCHEDULER II
John Jacobs

DOCUMENT CONTROL II
Christine Barcelon

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES

PRINCIPAL PROJECT MANAGER
Ryan Kristian AIA, LEED AP
3C ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
RWBID has organized a team of expert project managers,
construction managers, and project support staff. Our main goal is to effectively advise and assist the City with building this important community resource. Our firm is
experienced at managing these project types and we will provide all of the resources necessary to complete the
project on time and under budget. The following
organizational chart highlights the arrangement and
reporting structure of our team including key personnel and additional support staff proposed for this contract. You will find detailed resumes indicating relevant experience in Section 3D – Staff Resumes.
883
8 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Rancho Los Amigos Master Plan

DOWNEY, CA
Matthew was the Project Manager for
the master planning, redevelopment,
and construction of the Rancho Los
Amigos campus. The development plan
consists of 5 million SF of medical,
county office, commercial office, retail,
restaurant, hotel, and parking, and
all new infrastructure to support the
redevelopment. The project costs are
estimated at $2.7 billion.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Rancho Los Amigos South Campus
Headquarters Buildings

DOWNEY, CA
Matthew is also the Project Manager
for the new Rancho Los Amigos South
Campus project that will construct
a new ISD headquarters, Probation
Department headquarters, and a new
Sheriff Crime Lab. This project is
estimated to cost $468 million and will
be complete in 2021.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Rancho Los Amigos Hospital
Consolidation Project

DOWNEY, CA
Matthew was the Project Manager for
the pre-design and design of the $402
million project. Pre-design activities
include coordinating infrastructure
investigations, hazardous materials
investigations, materials testing, historic
analysis reports, environmental and
geotechnical investigations, and design
programming. Matthew also provided
oversight of the scoping documents for
the design-build project. He assisted
with project phasing to ensure the
facility would be operational during
construction and meet critical state
mandated deadlines.

ISD COUNTY DATA CENTER
County of Los Angeles, Department of
Public Works

DOWNEY, CA
Matthew was the Project manager for
design and construction of a new $208
million, 112,000 SF facility. The facility is
to be built partially below ground with a
vegetated roof and landscaped berms.

The project also includes historic
renovations to a Power Building, an
entry building, an office building, and
historic bungalows.

Matthew has 23 years of experience and has an extensive background in leading, managing, and coordinating an array of projects and programs. Matthew possesses a design and technical background and he is extremely detail oriented, excelling at all aspects of team leadership, project management, design management, construction management, and project administration. His diversity in project management is evident, having managed small projects from $750,000 up to billion-dollar programs. Matthew is also active in the Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) Southern California Chapter, serving on the Board of Directors since 2010. Matthew was recently selected by Engineering News-Record (ENR) California as a Top 20 Under 40 recipient.

This annual competition identifies the “Best-of-the-Best” in the construction and design industry and celebrates leadership, community involvement, and career dedication.

MATTHEW FELDHAUS ARCHITECT, CCM, LEED AP
Principal-In-Charge

RELE VAN T YE ARS OF EXPERIENCE
24 EDUC
ATION
Master of Architecture, University o f
Southern C alifornia,
Bachelor of Arts, Architecture Major,
Lehigh University

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Lice
nsed Architect, CA #C-33265
Certified Construction Manager (CMCI)
LEED Accredited Professional ( USGBC)

LOCAL PUBLIC

AGENCY EXPERIENCE
BUDGET

MANAGEMENT

PROFESSIONAL

LICENSE / CCM
VALUE

ENGINEERING

EXPERIENCE
QA/QC

EXPERIENCE

PROJECT/

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

LEED AP /

ENVISION

EXPERIENCE

SCHEDULE

MANAGEMENT
DESIGN

MANAGEMENT
JOC
CMAR
P3

DESIGN-BUILD
3D STAFF RESUMES
884
9 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
As Needed Consultant Project and
Program Management Services

ALHAMBRA, CA
Matthew was the Project Manager
and Construction Manager for the
design and construction of various
Public Works projects. On-site project
management Owner’s representative
managing schedule, budget, design,
construction, commissioning, and
closeout. Project delivery methods
include design-bid-build, design-build,
and Job Order Contracting.

GALLO CENTER FOR THE ARTS
Performing Arts Center

MODESTO, CA
Matthew was the Assistant Project
Manager for the new 1,600 seat, 85,000
SF, $38 million performing arts center
in Modesto, CA. Matthew assisted with
the redesign efforts when funding and
financing from the city were less than
expected. He met with the foundation
Board of Directors occasionally to give
project status updates and present
negotiated change orders for approval.

US BANKRUPTCY AND US TRUSTEES COURT
Tenant Improvements

MODESTO, CA
Matthew was the Project manager
for the design and construction of
the 15,000 SF tenant improvement
project. The project consisted of
a new court, supporting security
measures and offices, meeting spaces,
and modifications to the building
core services. Activities included
coordinating with multiple agencies
including the US General Services, US
Marshals, and courts personnel.

HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
Headquarters Building

LOS ANGELES, CA
Matthew was the Project manager for
the design and construction of the $8.5
million, 24,000 SF headquarters for
the non-profit entity. The new facility
serves as the headquarters for their
multiple free programs including
counseling, education, tattoo removal,
job training and job placement. The
project consists of a fully-functioning
bakery, catering facility, restaurant,
offices, tattoo removal clinic, and
classrooms.

CUSHMAN WATT SCOUT CENTER
Office Building and Parking Garage

LOS ANGELES, CA
Matthew was the Project manager for
the design and construction of a $9.5
million, 25,000 SF new office facility
and 42,000 SF parking garage and roof
landscape activities deck. The project
consists of new offices, retail shop,
community meeting rooms, and an
urban outdoor Scout experience located
on the roof of the adjacent parking
garage.

Rancho Los Amigos Master Plan
885
10 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Ryan has eightteen years of professional experience with an architectural and construction management background. He has been instrumental in projects where schedule and budget, as well as design, have been critical to the completion of complicated projects. Ryan has the ability to keep a project well organized and moving forward in order to achieve the goals of the client. Based on a strong sense of design coupled with a sincere concern for the built environment, Ryan excels at Project Management. His experience managing complicated higher educational projects coupled with his experience managing large scale owner capital projects is an asset to public agencies.

RYAN KRISTIAN AIA, LEED AP
Principal Project Manager

RELEVAN T YE ARS OF EXPERIENCE
19 EDUC
ATION
Master of Architecture, U niv ersity
of Southern California
Bachelor of Science in Architectural
Studies

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Licensed Architect, CA #C-32303
LEED Accredited Professional ( USGBC)

LOCAL PUBLIC

AGENCY EXPERIENCE
BUDGET

MANAGEMENT

PROFESSIONAL

LICENSE / CCM
VALUE

ENGINEERING

EXPERIENCE
QA/QC

EXPERIENCE

PROJECT/

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

LEED AP /

ENVISION

EXPERIENCE

SCHEDULE

MANAGEMENT
DESIGN

MANAGEMENT
JOC
CMAR
P3

DESIGN-BUILD

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Stoneview Nature Center

CULVER CITY, CA
As the Construction Manager for
the $10.5 million Stoneview Nature
Center design-build project, Ryan lead
the transformation of the five-acre
brownfield in a highly sustainable park.

The 4,000 SF Community Building and
Interpretive Garden are places for the
community to come together to engage
with each other and the environment.

The project has won four awards
including from CMAA and DBIA.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Helen Keller Park Remediation

LOS ANGELES, CA
Ryan was the construction manager for
this complicated landfill park project.

The Helen Keller Park low-bid project
required extensive coordination with
State and Local agencies, along with
full-time environmental monitoring,
and specialized contractors due to the
previously abandoned landfill. The
scope of work included relocating the
top 12” of soil from 6.6 acres to the
baseball field, which was surrounded
by a retaining wall to contain the
contaminated soil.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Park to Playa Trail: Stoneview Nature
Center to Scenic Overlook

CULVER CITY, CA
Ryan was the Project and Construction
Management of this $2.3 million trail
project required coordination with
State, County, and local cities on a site
previously occupied by the Inglewood
Oil Fields. The positive community
outreach lead to a design that required
grading of the sloped hillsides,
landscaping, and railings that met the
needs of all parties.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Park to Playa Trail: Stoneview Nature
Center to Kenneth Hahn State Recreation
Area

CULVER CITY, CA
Ryan’s organization skills and
proactive leadership were critical
to the success of this project. The
extensive Project Management of this
pedestrian bridge and trail project is
due to the involvement of many stake
holders across multiple municipalities,
including California, City of Los Angeles,
and the City of Culver City. The daily
management also includes coordination
of schedules with Southern California
Edison who is undergrounding overhead
electrical lines that conflict with the
120-foot span bridge.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Jesse Owens Basketball Court

LOS ANGELES, CA
The funding for this $900,000 project
required the Construction Management
of a fast schedule for both construction
and grant reimbursement. By
coordinating the County of Los Angeles
Department of Parks and Recreation
and the contractor, the project was
completed on-time and under budget.
886
11 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Central Juvenile Hall and Eastlake
Court Master Plan

LOS ANGELES, CA
Ryan’s Project Management required
compiling a team of qualified architects,
planners, and justice consultants. The
leadership of this project maintained
open lines of communication between
County Departments and the design
team to deliver a report that provided
not only master plan options, but
also construction phasing and cost
information.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Hall of Justice Cafeteria

LOS ANGELES, CA
The key to success for the Construction
Management of this 8,000 SF kitchen
and cafeteria was customer service and
transparency. By forging a bond with
the Sheriff’s Department, the District
Attorney, and the contractor, Ryan
delivered this challenging project using
trust and strict decision making.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Victoria Golf Course Redevelopment

CARSON, CA
Acting as the direct liaison between
the Second Supervisorial District and
the two private developers, Ryan is
providing proactive leadership to push
this large project to be completed by a
schedule unprecedented in the County.

This 180-acre site is being transformed
into a major sports complex including
40 tennis courts, 10 soccer fields, retail,
and Tiger Woods Top Golf.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Challenger Memorial Youth Center
Security Enhancements

LANCASTER, CA
As technology changes and the need
for security increases, the Ryan’s
project management included walking
the County of Los Angeles Probation
Department though research and design
to meet the needs of a State mandate
to enhance the lives of youth at the
camp. Included in the project is CCTV
along with panic alarms and related
infrastructure.

Stoneview Nature Center
887
12 Highly versatile, decisive and organized space planner, architect and owner representative with over 25 years of professional experience in new construction and modernization projects, working in all phases of design. Successfully managed and collaborated on a variety of projects, including educational, healthcare, workplace, residential and commercial work, consistently delivering quality work on time and within budget.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY OFFICE OF THE CEO
Real Estate Support Services

LOS ANGELES, CA
Space Analyst, creating programs and
space utilization recommendations
based on department’s current and
long-term space needs.
- Provides space programs based on
requests for new leases or lease
renewals.
- Evaluates space utilization and
provides recommendations for
future space use.
- Collects space request data and
survey information to provide
updates to GIS team.
- Analyzes survey information,
including telework data, to include in
project analysis.
- Prepares cost estimates and
coordinates approvals with
department budget analysts
- Presents analyses to Section Chief
and Real Estate Development
Manager.
- Provides input for Space Standard
guidelines as well as Policies and
Procedures.
- Leads coordination meetings with
Real Estate Development Leasing
group. -Creates improvements and
provides training for paperless
online space requests.
- Identifies and coordinates relocation
opportunities.
- Collaborated with design
professionals on strategic LA County
Space Reduction Plan.

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
(LAUSD)
Design Manager

LOS ANGELES, CA
Owner Representative for new
construction and comprehensive
modernization projectsmanaging the
District’s planning and design process
for the Facilities Services Division.
- Managed multiple projects
through interaction with architects,
consultants and District personnel
from project conception to final
approval.
- Ensured that plans were within
functional, budgetary, environmental
and legal requirements, and
met building codes and District
standards.
- Provided Architects and consultants
with clear and consistent direction
on work scope, project objectives,
standards, schedules and budget.
- Tracked internal and vendor cost
estimates at all stages of design.
- Reviewed design options and
ensured that the designs met the
project objectives, the needs of the
District, the local community and the
environment.
- Participated in community relations
and outreach programs.
- Ensured that all steps within the
project were documented per legal
requirements.
- Coordinated with other branches
such as Office of the Environment
Health & Safety, Maintenance &
Operations, and Project Execution.
- Verified building data and provided
updates for CAFM system.

RELEVANT YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
25 EDUCATION
Master of Architecture SCI-Arc, Los
Angeles, California
Diploma in Architecture Technische
Universität München (TUM), Munich,
Germany

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
CA Architect License C-30853
LEED BD+C

CDT (CSI)
TINKA ROGIC ARCH, LEED AP BD+C
Project
Manager III

LOCAL PUBLIC

AGENCY EXPERIENCE
BUDGET

MANAGEMENT

PROFESSIONAL

LICENSE / CCM
VALUE

ENGINEERING

EXPERIENCE
QA/QC

EXPERIENCE

PROJECT/

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

LEED AP /

ENVISION

EXPERIENCE

SCHEDULE

MANAGEMENT
DESIGN

MANAGEMENT
JOC
CMAR
P3

DESIGN-BUILD
888
13 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Sal has over 25 years of experience providing project management services to many large and complex Public and Private owner organizations, including LA County, Raytheon Corporation, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. He is well versed in the LA County project delivery procedures for projects and programs to deliver pool/aquatics projects, deferred maintenance projects, major renovations, central plant upgrades, ADA improvements, hazardous waste removal, and facility master planning. Sal has 9 years of experience with LA County ISD and Public Works managing projects for various County departments including CEO, Health Services, Libraries, Probation, Superior Courts, Sheriff, and Public Health.

LA COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION
Project Manager

AL HAMBRA, CA
Sal is managing the design,
construction, and inspection of the
installation of underwater lighting
and new deck lighting at 23 existing
pool and aquatic center facilities. The
fastracked program cost $11 million
and was phased to be completed
between two active swim seasons. The
program is part of the Parks After Dark
(PAD) program to provide nighttime
activities for youth during the summer
holiday season.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES PUBLIC WORKS
Project Manager

AL HAMBRA, CA
Mr. Manzella has managed dozens
of Facility Reinvestment Program
(FRP), deferred maintenance, new
construction, and tenant improvement
projects for LA County Public Works. He
has worked closely with the Sheriff’s
Department and Probation Department
to deliver their key capital improvement
projects. His duties include design
management, budget and schedule
management, construction
management, bidding coordination,
JOC review and oversight, and project
closeout.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES INTERNAL

SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Senior Project Manager

LOS ANGELES, CA
Mr. Manzella’s duties included multiple
capital construction projects for
the Department of Health Services,
Probation Department, Superior Courts,
and Public Health Department. His
responsibilities include development
of scope, design, evaluating proposals,
managing construction and closeout.

Oversaw RWBID staff of 6 PMs and
support staff. Select projects included:
- Camp Miller/Kilpatrick pool
renovation
- Barry J. Nidorf pool renovation
project
- Camp Challenger ADA upgrades
- B.J. Nidorf asbestos abatement
- Rio Hondo Probation office
renovations
- Warm Springs Rehabilitation Center
new water filtration system
- Harbor UCLA elevator modernization
- Harbor UCLA clinic building roof
replacement
- Registrar Recorder chapel and office
renovations
- Public Health Antelope Valley
Dorm-Z HVAC upgrades

RAYTHEON CORPORATION
Senior Facilities Project Manager

EL SEGUNDO, CA
Duties include project planning, design
management, procurement, and
construction management through
closeout. Mr. Manzella worked with
his customers from project inception
through delivery to the end-user
customer. Typical projects included
office renovations, site improvements,
roofing and HVAC replacement projects,
and new lab facilities. Select projects
included:
- Class 10k clean room design and
construction
- Laser lab renovation basement level
- Radar lab renovation w/emergency
back-up power system
- Laser lab high-rise rooftop location

SAL MANZELLA CCM, LEED AP
Construction Manager II

RELEVANT YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
25 EDUCATION
BS, Engineering & Construction
Management, California State University,
Long Beach

LICENSES/CERTIFICATIONS
Certified Construction Manager (CCM)
#A2159
California General Contractor B-License
#688242
LEED AP #10312984
Six Sigma Expert Certification

LOCAL PUBLIC

AGENCY EXPERIENCE
BUDGET

MANAGEMENT

PROFESSIONAL

LICENSE / CCM
VALUE

ENGINEERING

EXPERIENCE
QA/QC

EXPERIENCE

PROJECT/

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

LEED AP /

ENVISION

EXPERIENCE

SCHEDULE

MANAGEMENT
DESIGN

MANAGEMENT
JOC
CMAR
P3

DESIGN-BUILD
889
14 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
John has extensive experience in creating and maintaining schedules and providing contractor schedule reviews for multiple public agency clients including Los Angeles County Public Works, Los Angeles World Airports, Metro, and multiple school districts. John has been primarily responsible for construction oversight, creating and maintaining project schedules, verification of completed work for progress payments, creating specialized progress reports for upper management, and conducting Time Impact Analysis for critical path items.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

PUBLIC WORKS
Scheduler II

ALHAMBRA, CA
John is responsible for updating, building,
and maintaining the schedules for over 200
projects across LA County Public Works’
Capital Improvement Program. His work
includes:
• Schedule builds and monthly schedule
updates for $3 Billion of projects
• Contractor schedule baseline review,
contractor schedule update review, and
claims mitigation
• Knowledge of construction and advice for
avoidance of project delays
• Work with the Section Heads to create
special layouts and third-party reports
for data
• Effective communication and
problemsolving skills
• Identify deviations of the critical path due
to an activity slip
• Recommendation of recovery plans
• Create What-If schedules for multiple
delivery types
• Time Impact Analysis for change orders,
delayed activities, acts of God

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH POLICE AND FIRE

FACILITY
Scheduler

LOS ANGELES, CA
John provided scheduling services for
the $40 million new police and fire facility
project. He created monthly projected
costs, verified the work completed in the
field against the progress payment, created
deficiency notices, tracked submittals,
RFIs, and change orders. He coordinated
with several utility companies to relocate
utilities for an underground parking
structure. He created traffic control plans
for the excavation of sand from the site for
the parking structure.

LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS (LAWA)

CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT PROJECT
Scheduler

INGLEWOOD, CA
John provided construction scheduler
services for the new $255 million
central plant with a 20,000-ton cooling
capacity and utility distribution piping for
electrical, communications, reclaimed
water, fire water, and potable water
piping to all terminals. He created
a detailed buildable schedule with
commissioning activities, modified the
schedule sequencing and durations
to match job conditions, and adjusted
durations on cost loaded activities to
accurately predict completion dates. John
inserted additional change order work as
Time Impact Analysis into the schedule to
verify its impact on the critical path. All
new activities were coded to show up in
the reports delivered to the management
team. He provided weekly updates
and verified cost loaded activities and
remaining durations were accurate.

LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS (LAWA)

TOM BRADLEY INTERNATIONAL TERMINAL,
Scheduler

INGLEWOOD, CA
John provided scheduling services for
construction of the $1.5 Billion Tom
Bradley International Terminals at
LAX, adding one million square feet
for new terminals and core. This new
construction for the Tom Bradley Airport
also involved working on analyzing the
contract changes and scope creep to
determine which changes included time
impacts. John researched change orders
for Time Impact Analysis and determined
additional days to include in the schedule.

He updated the bi-weekly schedules
from the superintendent data for publish
to the owner and subcontractors. John
did a weekly job walk to verify the
superintendent’s updates.

JOHN JACOBS
Scheduler II

RELEVANT YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
25 EDUCATION
BS, Construction Management California
State University of Sacramento

LOCAL PUBLIC

AGENCY EXPERIENCE
BUDGET

MANAGEMENT

PROFESSIONAL

LICENSE / CCM
QA/QC

EXPERIENCE

PROJECT/

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

LEED AP /

ENVISION

EXPERIENCE
DESIGN

MANAGEMENT
JOC P3

DESIGN-BUILD
CMAR
VALUE

ENGINEERING

EXPERIENCE

SCHEDULE

MANAGEMENT
890
15 Sam is a highly skilled and motivated Senior Construction Cost Estimator with ten years of experience as a construction estimator in healthcare, commercial, educational, industrial, and residential projects. He has 6+ years of previous industry experience in Civil Engineering and construction management. Sam has provided cost estimates and change order review for multiple public agencies.

SENIOR COST ESTIMATOR

REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT LIST PROVIDED AS AN
ATTACHMENT.
- Prepared cost estimates for more
than 200 healthcare, commercial,
K-12, colleges, and heavy civil
projects
- Prepared quantity take-offs and cost
estimates for high-rise buildings
- Reviewed Guaranteed Maximum
Price (GMP) proposals and verified
validity of contractor proposed
pricing
- Prepared ROM estimates for
preliminary design and feasibility
studies
- Provided constructability reviews for
community college projects
- Analyzed, revised, and implemented
cost data based on changing market
conditions
- Provided contractor’s change order
review at the MLK Child Family Well
Being Center, Olive View Medical
Center, and the Port of Los Angeles

RELEVANT PROJECTS ESTIMATED
- P8301 Sunset Blvd Restaurant and
Office ($15M)
- AFB-Wright Patterson ($17M)
- Alhambra Unified School District -
Baldwin Elementary ($6M)
- Bethune Middle School - ADA Barrier
Removals ($2M)
- Cal Poly SLO University Union and
Building ($22M)
- California State University Los
Angeles: Student Housing Project
($26M)
- California State University San
Bernardino Student Union ($71M)
- Cerritos College Health Science
Renovation ($31M)
- City of Downey: Measure S Projects
($13M)
- City of LONG BEACH: more than 50
projects ($25M)
- County of San Diego: El Cajon Library
($1M)
- Fullerton College: Buildings 300 &
500 ($18M)
- GSA San Diego Office ($5M)
- Long Beach City College ($14M)
- Los Angeles Community College
District: ELAC ADA Phase III ($8M)
- Dockweiler Beach RV Park
Expansion ($1M)
- NOCCCD: Central Plant ($8M)
- Pasadena Expansion Ecology and
Life Science study ($145M)
- Port of Los Angeles: Change order
review (more than 20 projects)
- Port of Los Angeles: On-Call Cost
Estimate

SAM SHABANI EIT
Estimator II

RELEVANT YEARS OF EXPERIENCE
10 EDUCATION
Tehran Polytechnic, MSc in Geotechnical
Engineering
Azad University, Tehran, Iran, BS in Civil
Engineering

LOCAL PUBLIC

AGENCY EXPERIENCE
BUDGET

MANAGEMENT

PROFESSIONAL

LICENSE / CCM
VALUE

ENGINEERING

EXPERIENCE
QA/QC

EXPERIENCE

PROJECT/

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

LEED AP /

ENVISION

EXPERIENCE

SCHEDULE

MANAGEMENT
DESIGN

MANAGEMENT
JOC P3

DESIGN-BUILD
CMAR
891
16 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Christine has an extensive background in providing all aspects of construction/project management support, administration, records management, closeout, procedures, and facility operations. She is a self-motivated, diligent manager that works with a sense of urgency and possesses strong analytical skills. She is a team player with comprehensive experience in construction project management and engineering support working on some of the largest projects in Southern California, including the $1.8 billion Harbor UCLA Master Plan project, Olive View Medical Center, and the $5 billion Inglewood LA Rams Stadium project.

CHRISTINE BARCELON
Document Control II

HARBOR UCLA MASTER PLAN
Document Control Manager

TORRANCE, CA
Christine is the lead document control
manager for the $1.8 billion Harbor
UCLA Master Plan project. In her role
as manager, she leads a team of six (6)
technical and administrative staff to
support the construction management
team. She works closely with the Public
Works project management team
to successfully deliver the projects
and resolve issues. Christine’s duties
included:
- Process and maintain project
documents according to County
procedures
- Distribute and assign workload
amongst the six support team
members
- Provide leadership to resolve issues
- Establish the policies and
procedures for document control
activities as part of the Project
Management Plan (PMP)
- Manage correspondence, field
memos, submittals, invoices,
drawing logs, safety notices, RFIs,
and photos

OLIVE VIEW MEDICAL CENTER PROJECTS
Document Control II

SYLMAR, CA
Christine is the lead document control
manager and office/trailer manager
for various seismic compliance and
renovation projects at Olive View
Medical Center. Projects include a new
Agriculture Commission trailer, new
clinical space, installation of code blue
stations, emergency power upgrades,
Fire Alarm and Nurse Call system
upgrades, gastrointestinal tenant
improvements, and SB1953 seismic
compliance at the inpatient building.

Christine’s duties included:
- Provided construction support
services to project management
staff on multiple, concurrent,
Projects through Closeout, tracking
closeout status,
compiling required
documentation, assembling
turnover packages and maintaining
archival records both in-house and
off-site.
- Process and maintain project
documents according to
County procedures · Manage
correspondence, field memos,
submittals, invoices, saf
ety notices,
RFIs
- Preparation of Board letters, NTPs,
meeting minutes, and transmittals
- Provide administrative support
working in the office/trailer
- Conducted all project closeout
coordination including the following
tasks:

Tracked closeout status,
including DSA approvals, compiled
all required documentation, ensured
punch list items were completed,
administratively assisted with final
payment and retention release
documentation, assembled turnover
packages, maintained archival
records, assisted with FF&E / move-in
transition, coordinated warranty and
Maintenance & Operations manual
turnover

RELEVANT YEARS

OF EX PE RIENCE
18 EDUCATION
College of the Holly Spirit, Manila,
Philippines, B.S. in Nutrition

PROFESSIONAL

LICENSE / CCM

LOCAL PUBLIC

AGENCY EXPERIENCE
BUDGET

MANAGEMENT
VALUE

ENGINEERING

EXPERIENCE
QA/QC

EXPERIENCE

PROJECT/

CONSTRUCTION

MANAGEMENT

LEED AP /

ENVISION

EXPERIENCE

SCHEDULE

MANAGEMENT
DESIGN

MANAGEMENT
JOC
CMAR
P3

DESIGN-BUILD
892

SCOPE OF SERVICES
04 SECTION
Pico Rivera Library Renovation

PICO RIVERA, CA
893
17 SCOPE OF SERVICES
4A STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES
RWBID has reviewed the scope of work for the project described in the Request for Proposal. We have also extensively reviewed the project’s prior history and the City’s concern to provide a right-sized project that is fiscally prudent. We are proposing the right technical staff and administrative services to accomplish the goals for the project, and we are ensuring that we are caretakers of this public funding. The following table identifies the services listed in the RFP that will be provided in-house by RWBID professional and technical staff. This table includes our approach to staff the project and identifies the staff with Primary (P) and Support (S) responsibilities to accomplish the scope of work. 04 Stevenson Ranch Library Renovation

STEVENSON RANCH, CA
894
18 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

TASK SCOPE OF SERVICES
Ryan Kristan
(Principal Project Manager)
Tinka Rogic
(Project Manager III)
Sal Manzella
(Construction Manager II)
John Jacobs
(Scheduler II)
Sam Shabani
(Estimator II)
Christine Barcelon
(Document Control II)

2.1 Develop a comprehensive proj mgmt plan outlining objectives, timelines, milestones, and budget S P S S S

2.2 Coordinate with stakeholders including library management, AE, contractors, and relevant authorities. S P

2.3 Establish effective communication channels to ensure timely updates and resolution of issues. S P

2.4 Conduct regular progress meetings and provide detailed reports to stakeholders. S P

2.5 Monitor project progress, identify potential risks, and implement mitigation strategies. S P S

2.6 Manage project documentation, including contracts, permits, and approvals. PSS

3.1 Review and approve design documents to ensure alignment with project requirements and budget. S P

3.2 Constructability, cost estimation and bid documentation reviews.

3.3 Assist obtaining necessary permits and approvals from City engineering, planning and building & safety.

3.4 Develop a detailed project schedule incorporating design, procurement, and construction phases.

3.5 Grant management to ensure the project design complies with the State requirements.

4.1 Assist with the bidding process for selecting contractors and subcontractors.

4.2 Manage construction activities to ensure adherence to specifications, quality, and safety protocols.

4.3 Conduct regular site inspections to monitor progress and compliance with the construction schedule.

4.4 Address any design modifications or unforeseen issues in a timely manner.

4.5 Facilitate coordination among various trades to minimize disruptions and conflicts.

4.6 Implement a robust change management process to document and evaluate any deviations.

4.7 Review of all contractor applications for payment.

4.8 Manage and maintain documentation storage and control.

4.9 Grant management to insure all constructed items comply with the State requirements.

5.1 Conduct final inspections and ensure completion of all punch list items.

5.2 Facilitate the transition of the expanded facility to the library management team.

5.3 Provide training and support for operating and maintaining new systems and equipment.

5.4 Ensure all project documentation, as-built drawings, and warranties are handed over to the library.

5.5 Grant closeout.

6.1 Project Management Plan

6.2 Design Review Reports

6.3 Progress Reports

6.4 Meeting Minutes

6.5 Construction Inspection Reports

6.6 Change Order Log

6.7 Final Inspection Reports

6.8 Training Documentation

7.1 Successful handover of the expanded library facility to the library management team.

7.2 Post-project evaluation meetings to gather feedback and identify lessons learned for future projects.

P = Primary Responsibility S = Support Responsibility S
P S
S S P
S P
P S
S P

S P S S
S P S
P S
P
P S S

P S S S

S S S S P
S S P
P
S S P
S S P

S S S S P

S P S S S

S P S S S S

S P S S S

P P S S S
P P S
P S

P S S S
P S
P S

S S P S

S P S S S S
895

FEE PROPOSAL
05 SECTION
AC Bilbrew Librar y Renovation

LOS ANGELES, CA
896
19 FEE PROPOSAL
5A MAXIMUM NOT-TO-EXCEED FEE
RWBID proposes a Not-to-Exceed Fee of $475,000 to provide Project and Construction Management services for the City of Murrieta Library Expansion Project. This Not-to-Exceed Fee includes labor hours identified in the resource plan and $7,925 for reimbursable costs over the course of the project.

In addition, if RWBID is selected to manage this project, the company will pledge to donate $10,000 to the Murrieta Public Library Foundation. The donation will highlight that our firm and our staff are dedicated to being good stewards of public and donated funds for the project. The donation would be scheduled to be made at the midpoint of the construction phase, should we be contracted for this project
.
05 Pico Rivera Library Renovation

PICO RIVERA, CA
897

J JASO NDJ F M A MJ JASO NDJ F M A MJ JASO ND
City Council Award Contracts/NTP Jun-2024
Schematic Design Aug-2024
Design Development Oct-2024
Construction Documents Jan-2025
Plan Check and Permitting Mar-2025
FF&E Design Mar-2025
Bid and Award Jun-2025
NTP for Construction Jul-2025
Construction Aug-2026
Closeout Sep-2026
Project Complete Sep-2026
FF&E Move Management Nov-2026
J J A S O N D J F M A M J Subtotal Hours Rate Subtotal
Pre-Construction Phase J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Subtotal Hours Rate Subtotal Construction Phase
Principal Project Manager Ryan Kristan 0 20 20 20 20 20 0000000 1 0 0 220.00$ 22,000$ 2 0 2 0 000000000000 2 0 000 6 0 220.00 $ 13,200$ Project Manager III Tinka Rogic 0 80 80 60 60 60 60 60 45 45 45 45 45 685 195.00$ 133,575$ 3 0 3 0 0000000000000000 6 0 195.00 $ 11,700$ Construction Manager II Sal Manzella 000000000000 2 0 2 0 180.00$ 3,600$ 20 80 80 80 80 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 40 40 40 0 1,000 180.00 $ 180,000$ Scheduler II John Jacobs 0 0 40 0 40 0 0 40 00000 1 2 0 160.00$ 19,200$ 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 00000000000 8 0 160.00 $ 12,800$ Estimator II Sam Shabani 0 0 40 0 40 0 0 40 00000 1 2 0 175.00$ 21,000$ 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 00000000000 8 0 175.00 $ 14,000$ Document Control II Christine Barcelon 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 120 100.00$ 12,000$ 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 10 10 0 240 100.00 $ 24,000$ Reimburseables Not-To-Exceed 3,625$ Not-To-Exceed 4,300$ Donation to Murrieta Public Library Foundation (10,000)$ Project Labor Total 0 110 190 90 170 90 70 150 55 55 55 55 75 1,065 80 190 140 120 120 100 100 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 80 50 50 0 1,520 215,000$ 250,000$
465,000$ Total Not-To-Exceed Fee
Subtotal Pre-Construction Fee
2025 2025
2025 2025
Subtotal Construction Fee
Lump Sum
Schedule Milestones Finish Date
Position Staff
2024 2026
2024 2026
Pre-Construction Phase Construction Phase
22 RWBID CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
5B RESOURCE PLAN
898
899
RESOLUTION NO. 25-4884

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE AN INTERFUND LOAN UP
TO $ 3,500,000 FROM THE MEASURE T FUND TO THE LIBRARY

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND TO PARTIALLY FUND THE
CHILDREN’S LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT (CIP NO. 21027).

WHEREAS, the City owns and operates the Murrieta Public Library facility (the “Library”); and

WHEREAS, the City desires to do various improvements to the library, including the Children’s Library Expansion Project; and

WHEREAS, the City maintains the Library Development Impact Fund as a special fund for development impact fees received from developers pursuant to Resolution No. 98-612 and Municipal Code 16.36 for the purpose of providing funds to improve the library, including the Project; and

WHEREAS, the Library Development Impact Fund does not have sufficient funds to fund the entire project; and

WHEREAS, the City desires to loan and transfer $3.5 million from its Measure T Fund reserves, in lieu of obtaining third-party financing, to the Library DIF Fund for the purpose of carrying out the Project; and

WHEREAS, the City proposes to charge interest at a rate of one percent (1%) per annum for the Inter-Fund Loan; and

WHEREAS, the Inter-Fund Loan serves a public purpose by ensuring the continued enhancement and improvement of the Library to the benefit of the City’s constituents.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS

Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Murrieta hereby approves the $3.5 million Inter-Fund loan (Exhibit A)from the Measure T Fund to the Library Development Impact Fee Fund for the Children’s Expansion.

Section 2. That the Inter-Fund Loan terms are $3.5 million loan amortized over thirty years with interest accruing at one percent (1%).

Section 3. That the City Manager or designee is authorized to administer the loan and the planned schedule of repayment.

900
RR 5/08/09
2 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19 day of August, 2025.

____________________________
Cindy Warren, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________
Tiffany Israel, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§

CITY OF MURRIETA )
I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 25-4884 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Murrieta at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 19 day of August, 2025, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

901

A-1

INTER-FUND TRANSFER/ LOAN AGREEMENT
This INTER-FUND TRANSFER/ LOAN AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this 19 day of August, 2025, by and among the Measure T Fund (Fund No. 111) (“Measure T Fund”) and the Library Development Impact Fee Fund (Fund No. 131) (“Library DIF Fund”) of the City of Murrieta (the "City"), each of which has a separate and distinct source of income, to wit, the Measure T Fund is funded by Sales & Use Tax, and the Library DIF Fund is a special fund and is funded by fees paid by developers in connection with development projects pursuant to Resolution No. 98-612 and Municipal Code 16.36 provides that the amount of the DIF fee shall be established by resolution.

R E C I T A L S
A. The City owns and operates the Murrieta Public Library facility (the “Library”).

The City desires to do various improvements to the library, including the Children’s Library Expansion Project (the “Project”).

B. The City maintains the Library DIF Fund as a special fund for development impact fees received from developers pursuant to Resolution No. 98-612 and Municipal Code 16.36 for the purpose of providing funds to improve the library, including the Project.

C. The City now desires to construct the Project , as more particularly described in Exhibit A hereto, that is funded from the Library DIF Fund; however, there are insufficient funds in the Library DIF Fund to fund the entire Project.

D. The City desires to loan and transfer funds from its Measure T Fund reserves, in lieu of obtaining third-party financing, to the Library DIF Fund for the purpose of carrying out the Project (the “Inter-Fund Loan”).

E. The City proposes to charge interest at a rate of one percent (1%) per annum for the Inter-Fund Loan. This interest rate is less than the rate the City would pay if it were to finance the Project from outside sources because the current market interest rate for municipal bonds and/or certificates of participation is approximately 5.5% per annum.

F. The Inter-Fund Loan ser ves a public purpose by ensuring the continued enhancement and improvement of the Library to the benefit of the City’s constituents.

C O V E N A N T S
Based upon the foregoing Recitals and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by both parties, the Measure T Fund and the Library DIF Fund hereby agree as follows:

1. Recitals Incorporated.
902

A-2

The Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated into this Agreement by this reference.

2. Inter-Fund Loan.

On or after August, 2025, the Measure T Fund may provide for inter-fund loans on the terms specified below to the Library DIF Fund to the extent necessary to fund the Project but in an amount that is to not exceed $3,500,000. This amount is based upon the reasonable expected cost of the Project as determined by the anticipated project bid & management costs . All inter- fund loans shall be trac ked by the City’s Finance Department . The funds may only be used for costs associated with the Project.

3. Repayment.

The Library DIF Fund agrees to repay the Inter-Fund Loan Amount, with interest accruing at 1% amortized over thirty 30 years beginning on or after July 1, 2026, as provided in the Payment Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit B (the “Schedule”). The Inter-Fund Loan shall be payable out of funds deposited in the Library DIF Fund. In the event that the Library DIF Fund lacks sufficient funds to make payment as provided in the Schedule, then the amount shall be payable from the next available revenues of the Library DIF Fund . Delinquent amounts shall bear interest at the same rate as the Inter-Fund Loan.

4. Additional Debt.

The Library DIF Fund may incur indebtedness which is superior, on a parity or subordinate to the Inter-Fund Loan. In the absence of an express determination by the Library DIF Fund to the contrary, any such indebtedness shall be superior to the Inter-Fund Loan.

5. Prepayment.

The Library DIF Fund may prepay any Inter-Fund Loan without penalty at any time during the term of the Inter-Fund Loan.

6. Entire Agreement; Amendment.

This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement related to the Inter -Fund Loan .

Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement may be modified or amended only by an agreement approved by the City Council.

7. Non-Liability of City Officials, Officers, and Employees.

No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of the City shall be personally liable for any amount that may become due to the City hereunder.

8. Termination of Agreement.

This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect for a period of , and the obligations of the Library DIF Fund shall terminate on written notice by either party of such termination or payment in full of the Inter-Fund Loan, whichever occurs first. 903

A-3

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the date and year first written above.

CITY OF MURRIETA (MEASURE T FUND)
By: ________________________________
Cindy Warren, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
By: ____________________________
Tiffany Israel, City Attorney

CITY OF MURRIETA (LIBRARY DIF FUND)
By: _______________________________
Cindy Warren, Mayor

ATTEST:
________________________________
Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

904

A-4

Exhibit A
Project

Project Description: The proposed project will complete the original plans and final build -out of the Library in the current garden area. The Children's section will be expanded , and a large storytime room will be added that can hold various programs and accommodate events for the community.
905

A-5

Exhibit B
Schedule

Interfund Loan Amount: 3,500,000
Annual Interest Rate: 1.0%
Loan Terms (Years): 30
Interfund Loan From Measure T Fund to Library DIF Fund
Year Annual Payment Interest Principal Remaining Balance 1 135,618.40 35,000.00 100,618.40 3,399,381.60 2 135,618.40 33,993.82 101,624.58 3,297,757.02 3 135,618.40 32,977.57 102,640.83 3,195,116.20 4 135,618.40 31,951.16 103,667.23 3,091,448.96 5 135,618.40 30,914.49 104,703.91 2,986,745.06 6 135,618.40 29,867.45 105,750.95 2,880,994.11 7 135,618.40 28,809.94 106,808.46 2,774,185.66 8 135,618.40 27,741.86 107,876.54 2,666,309.12 9 135,618.40 26,663.09 108,955.31 2,557,353.81 10 135,618.40 25,573.54 110,044.86 2,447,308.95 11 135,618.40 24,473.09 111,145.31 2,336,163.65 12 135,618.40 23,361.64 112,256.76 2,223,906.89 13 135,618.40 22,239.07 113,379.33 2,110,527.56 14 135,618.40 21,105.28 114,513.12 1,996,014.44 15 135,618.40 19,960.14 115,658.25 1,880,356.19 16 135,618.40 18,803.56 116,814.83 1,763,541.35 17 135,618.40 17,635.41 117,982.98 1,645,558.37 18 135,618.40 16,455.58 119,162.81 1,526,395.56 19 135,618.40 15,263.96 120,354.44 1,406,041.12 20 135,618.40 14,060.41 121,557.99 1,284,483.13 21 135,618.40 12,844.83 122,773.56 1,161,709.57 22 135,618.40 11,617.10 124,001.30 1,037,708.27 23 135,618.40 10,377.08 125,241.31 912,466.95 24 135,618.40 9,124.67 126,493.73 785,973.23 25 135,618.40 7,859.73 127,758.66 658,214.56 26 135,618.40 6,582.15 129,036.25 529,178.31 27 135,618.40 5,291.78 130,326.61 398,851.70 28 135,618.40 3,988.52 131,629.88 267,221.82 29 135,618.40 2,672.22 132,946.18 134,275.64 30 135,618.40 1,342.76 134,275.64 - Payment Loan Schedule
City of Murrieta
906

MURRIETA CHILDREN’S LIBRARY EXPANSION PROJECT

FLOOR PLAN & RENDERINGS
907

908

909

910

911

912

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 24.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: David Chantarangsu, AICP, Development Services Director PREPARED BY: Jarrett Ramaiya, Deputy Development Director SUBJECT:

Approval of Agreements for Environmental Work for Los Alamos Sports Park Soccer Project

RECOMMENDATION
Amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Operating Budget by establishing an appropriation of $347,230 for contract services;
Approve an Amendment to the Agreement with Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. in the amount of $163,120 for environmental analysis and permitting;
Approve an Agreement with RICK in the amount of $184,110 for environmental analysis and permitting; Authorize the exemption from bidding requirements; and
Authorize the City Manager to execute both Agreements.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On April 6, 2021, the City Council passed Resolution No. 21-4376 authorizing an agreement with Harris & Associates to provide a project manager for the Los Alamos Sports Park Soccer Project (Vote: 5-0).

On December 7, 2021, City Council conceptually approved the plan to move forward with seeking the entitlement for the proposed Los Alamos Sports Park Soccer Project (Vote: 5-0).

On March 20, 2024, the City Manager approved an Agreement with Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc., for biological surveying and permitting with the Agencies.

On September 3, 2024, the City Council asked staff to bring back the item to the next City Council hearing to review the status of the soccer project (Vote: 5-0).

On September 17, 2024, the City Council formed an Ad-Hoc Subcommittee to review the status of the soccer project and discuss the expenditure of funds (Vote: 5-0).

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 1 of 6
powered by Legistar™
913
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 24.

CITY COUNCIL GOAL
Coordinate and deliver responsive, effective community services.

BACKGROUND
Since 2018, the City of Murrieta (City) has been working with the Murrieta Youth Soccer League (MYSL), pursuing development of additional soccer fields at Los Alamos Hills Sports Park (Park), located at 37000 Ruth Ellen Way. The Park is generally bounded by Whitewood Road on the north, Los Alamos Road to the south, and Ruth Ellen Way to the west.

The goal of developing the Park is to expand recreational opportunities for residents, as well as to create a regional recreational venue for competitive youth soccer. The Park includes football, soccer, and other recreational sports fields. The current concept for expanding the Park (Project) includes six soccer fields, a building for bathrooms, lighting, and on-site parking areas. The fields will provide expanded recreational amenities, which the City hopes will draw visitors to the area annually, boosting the local economy as visitors patronize local stores, restaurants, and hotels. The development of additional soccer fields at the Park is currently unfunded but MYSL has expressed interest is a partnership whereby the City would finance improvements and MYSL would pay the associated debt service. The City is currently reviewing a proforma submitted by MYSL that further explores the potential for such a partnership.

At the September 3, 2024, City Council hearing, staff presented a similar request for project and environmental permitting. City Council voted to form an Ad-Hoc Subcommittee to look closely at the project and cost. Council Members Ron Holliday and Jon Levell volunteered to be Ad-Hoc Subcommittee members and held meetings with staff to discuss the proposal. The Ad Hoc Subcommittee focused on several issues, including:
· Whether to pursue environmental permitting now or to wait until plans for the park’sdevelopment were solidified between the City and MYSL.
· The scope of environmental permitting and whether or not a criteria refinement would be necessary or some lower standard of environmental review.
· Issues relating to land conservation to satisfy the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA).

The Ad Hoc Subcommittee ultimately reached the conclusion that the City should pursue environmental permitting regardless of any specific proposed park development because the permitting must be completed for any future development of the land. The City does not own any other large properties appropriate for the location of sports fields and costs to permit the property will only increase over time. The Subcommittee also reached the conclusion that a Criteria Refinement is likely beyond what is required for environmental permitting. However, that issue remains a conversation between the City, RCA and state and federal wildlife agencies.

Project Consistency with MSHCP
Land development, including the further development of the Park, is subject to the MSHCP, which is a master plan for the conservation of sensitive habitat areas and species within western Riverside County. The City is a permittee of the MSHCP and is bound by its procedures and conservation objectives. Los Alamos Park is included within an area of the MSHCP known as Core 2. This area of the MSHCP includes over 8,800 acres, nearly half of which may include habitat for rare, threatened, or endangered plants and animal species. The RCA administers the MSHCP. In the image below, Core 2 is shown east of Interstate 215, over the Los Alamos area, and goes farther to the northeast into the County of Riverside.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 2 of 6
powered by Legistar™
914
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 24.

MSHCP CORE 2 VICINITY MAP
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 3 of 6
powered by Legistar™
915
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 24.

After meeting with State, federal, and regional agencies involved in the Project’s environmental review process, the City was informed that implementation of Phase 2 for the Park would require a complex environmental review process under the MSHCP referred to as Criteria Refinement, which would allow the City to deviate from the stated habitat conservation objectives for land Core 2.

Staff and the Ad Hoc Subcommittee disagree with the RCA’sposition that the City is subject to a Criteria Refinement process, as City records indicate that mitigation for both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Park was completed. As such, the recommended contract amendments do not include work to process a Criteria Refinement but include the other necessary environmental permitting due to the verified presence within the Project area of plants, avian, and other species that are considered “candidate,”“rare,”“threatened,”and “endangered” under regional requirements (MSHCP), and State and federal law.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 4 of 6
powered by Legistar™
916
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 24.

City Consultant Status
In searching for the most effective consultant for the environmental permitting requirements, staff previously identified Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. (GLA) as the consulting firm that has successfully completed complex environmental permitting processes with the RCA, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). In addition, GLA has specialized experience with agency permit processes that will be critical in surveying for other protected species that are not included in the MSHCP but are protected by the state. The City will need to obtain permits from the State to undertake the Project, and GLA has specialized experience in the surveying and permitting processes that will be required.

In addition to GLA, staff are requesting to onboard RICK (formerly Rick Engineering Company) to provide planning, engineering, and design services related to processing the necessary permits from the State. To provide more supporting information that cannot be accomplished by GLA, RICK will provide additional technical studies and information, such as a conceptual grading plan, stormwater management plan, drainage study, stormwater plan, surveying, and the preparation of an environmental document. Contract amendments and scopes of work for GLA and RICK are attached for the City Council’s reference.

City Competitive Bidding Process
The City’s purchasing regulations in Murrieta Municipal Code Chapter 3.08, as well as administrative purchasing procedures, govern the acquisition of contract services. Contracts for services that exceed $75,000 are typically obtained through a formal bidding process. However, exceptions can be made in accordance with the provisions of Murrieta Municipal Code Section 3.08.280.

The Development Services Department (DSD) is currently working with GLA for the preparation of the State and federal permit applications. To prepare and submit the necessary applications to the agencies, DSD would need to expand the services provided by GLA and retain the services of RICK. These two firms have been selected due to their experience and proven track record.

The proposed Amendment for GLA will increase the amount to $163,120, expand the scope of work, and extend the term to June 30, 2027.

The proposed Agreement with RICK will allocate $184,110, expand the scope of work, and extend the term to June 30, 2027.

FISCAL IMPACT
If the City Council approves staff’s recommendations, the total amount for both GLA and RICK contract amendments totals $347,230. Staff recommends that the City Council direct staff to amend the operating budget in FY 2025/26 and increase appropriation using General Fund Unassigned Fund Balance in the amount of $347,230 in the Planning Division operating budget for Contract Services account number 1104400- 60480 ($163,120 for Glenn Lukos, Inc.) and 1101600-60320 ($184,110 for Rick) to enter into an agreement for the Los Alamos Sports Park Soccer Project. The succeeding fiscal year of this amended agreement will be budgeted as part of the biennial budget process.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc.

2. Agreement with Rick
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 5 of 6
powered by Legistar™
917
8/19/2025
Agenda Item No. 24.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 8/14/2025Page 6 of 6
powered by Legistar™
918

01375.0001/937862.4 -1-

AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH

THE CITY OF MURRIETA AND CONSULTANT

Amendment No.: 1
Original Agreement Title (“Agreement”): Agreement with Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc.

Agreement Effective Date: 03/20/24
Agreement Termination Date: 12/31/25
Consultant Name: Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc.

Brief Description of Scope of Services (“Services”): Additional environmental analysis and Agency permitting.

This Amendment to the Agreement, made effective on the date executed by the City by and between the City of Murrieta, a Municipal Corporation, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California ("City"), and the above re ferenced Consultant with reference to the following facts which are acknowledged by each party as true and correct:

RECITALS

Whereas, City is a general law city, formed and existing pursuant to the provisions of the California Government Code.

Whereas, City and Consultant entered into an Agreement on the Effective Date set forth above for the Services.

Whereas, City and Consultant wish to amend the Agreement as further set forth herein.

Whereas, the Agreement was previously modified by the following prior amendments: None.

AMENDMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct.

2. The following terms of the Agreement are hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 3.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

“The term of this Agreement shall be from March 4, 2024, until June 30, 2027.”

Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

“Consideration. In consideration of the services to be performed by CONSULTANT for the 919

01375.0001/937862.4 -2-

CITY as set forth in Section 1, the CITY agrees to pay CONSULTANT the rates set forth in Exhibit A-1 with a total contract not-to-exceed sum of One Hundred and Sixty Three Thousand, Twenty Dollars ($163,020.00). Hourly billing shall be in increments of six (6) minutes for actual time spent working on the Project.”

Pursuant to Section 4.2 of the Agreement, additional services to include cultural resources (CEQA archeological resources assessment and consultation under AB-52) and additional biological support (additional species surveys, preparation of technical studies, additional environmental permitting (Incidental Take Permit) are hereby added to the Scope of Services as set forth in the attached proposal.

3. All other conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be executed on the dates set forth below.

[Signature Page to Follow.]

920

01375.0001/937862.4 -3-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF MURRIETA, a California municipal
corporation
By:

Justin Clifton, City Manager
ATTEST: Date:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP

Tiffany Israel, City Attorney
Date:

CONSULTANT:

Two corporate officer signatures required when
Contractor is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chairperson of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. (Cal. Corp. Code § 313.) Appropriate attestations shall be included as may be required by the bylaws, articles of incorporation or other rules or
regulations applicable to Contractor’s business City.

By:

Name: Thienan Pfeiffer
Title: Director of Regulatory Services, Glenn
Lukos Association, Inc.

Date:

By:

Name:Dominique Brunel
Title:Secretary, Glenn Lukos Association, Inc.

Date:
921

SCOPE OF WORK

MSHCP, REGULATORY, CULTURAL RESOURCES SUPPORT

LOS ALAMOS SPORTS COMPLEX

MURRIETA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

TASK I. MSHCP CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS

Since the Project site is located within the MSHCP Criteria Area, the Project will require Joint Project Review (JPR). GLA will prepare a Joint Project Review (JPR) application and submit this package to the City and RCA in accordance with MSHCP requirements. The JPR application will include the following:

• Background information, such as information regarding the applicant; • Assessor’s parcel numbers;
• Total acres of development and conservation; and
• A description of the proposed Project.

In support of the JPR application, GLA will prepare a MSHCP Consistency Analysis. The report will summarize the biological findings, present the Project design, and analyze how the Project correlates to the MSHCP guidelines. The report will also discuss Riparian/Riverine and Vernal Pool Areas, Narrow Endemic Plant Species, Additional Survey Areas, Urban/Wildlife Interface, Criteria Cell Requirements, and Criteria Area Species. The report will follow the RCA template for the MSHCP Consistency Analysis.

TASK II. PREPARE DETERMINATION OF BIOLOGICAL EQUIVA LENT OR

SUPERIOR PRESERVATION (DBESP) ANALYSIS

GLA will prepare a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation (DBESP) Analysis that meets the requirements for approval of a DBESP. The report will provide a definition of the project area for all portions of the project; a written project description, demonstrating why an avoidance alternative is not feasible; a written description of biological information available for the project site including the results of resource mapping; soils description/analysis/map, floral and faunal list; analysis of 100% avoidance and alternatives (including minimization of direct and indirect effects); quantification of unavoidable impacts to the MSHCP species/habitats triggering the DBESP, including direct and indirect effects; a functions and values assessment that will focus on affects to downstream values related to Conserved Species; habitat assessments for least Bell’s vireo, southwestern willow flycatcher, western yellow-billed cuckoo, Riverside fairy shrimp, and vernal pool fairy shrimp; a written description of project design features and mitigation measures that reduce indirect effects, such as edge treatments, landscaping, elevation difference, minimization and/or compensation through restoration or enhancement; written discussion of edge treatments and their relation to the functions and values to be conserved (including lighting, noise, trash/debris, urban and storm water runoff, toxic material, exotic plant and animal infestations, dust); mitigation measures need to demonstrate ensure long-term conservation and need to consider restoration and/or enhancement of on-site habitat restoration and/or enhancement of off-site habitat; and a finding 922

demonstrating that although the proposed project would not avoid impacts, with proposed design and compensation measures, the project would be biologically equivalent or superior to that which would occur under an avoidance alternative without these measures.

The client will need to provide the necessary project details including engineering details and design, construction timing, and alternatives for the DBESP. This task and cost estimate include budget sufficient for one thorough revision to the draft (initial) report and one revision to the report following initial wildlife agency review and comment.

TASK III. COORDINATE JOINT PROJECT REVIEW (T&M)

GLA will coordinate with the Project team and the RCA as part of the JPR process. The RCA has 14 days to review an initial JPR application package and either issue JPR Findings or provide comments requiring revisions. Each subsequent review after resubmittal of the documents to the RCA is another 14 days. GLA recommends that the Project team attend at least one pre-application meeting with the RCA and Wildlife Agencies to discuss the Project, although additional meetings could be necessary. This task assumes five meetings with the Project team, two coordination meetings with the RCA and Wildlife Agencies, and miscellaneous coordination. Should additional meetings be required, a change order will be prepared to incorporate these additional meetings into GLA’s scope of work.

TASK IV. COORDINATE DBESP REVIEW (T&M)

GLA will coordinate with the Project team and the RCA as part of the DBESP review process. The Wildlife Agencies have 60 days to perform an initial review of a DBESP Analysis once the RCA has completed JPR. If the Wildlife Agencies provide comments requiring revisions to the DBESP Analysis, then each subsequent review could take up to another 60 days, although subsequent reviews could be expedited depending on the extent of revisions. GLA recommends that the Project team attend at least one DBESP pre-application meeting (which is different from the general pre- application meetings recommended prior to JPR) with the RCA and Wildlife Agencies to discuss the Project, although additional meetings could be necessary. This task assumes three meetings with the Project team, two coordination meetings with the RCA and Wildlife Agencies, and miscellaneous coordination. Should additional meetings be required, a change order will be prepared to incorporate these additional meetings into GLA’s scope of work.

TASK V. DELINEATE ON SITE FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCY JURISDICTION

A field team of regulatory specialists will re-delineate Corps jurisdictional boundaries within the project site. The field team will investigate specific conditions relating to jurisdictional criteria such as evidence of ordinary high water marks (OHWM), wetland vegetation indicator species, hydric soils, and appropriate hydrology, all as outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (1987 Manual) and the 2008 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region (Version 2.0). Reference will also made to the 2019 State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State (State Board Wetland Definition and Procedures) to identify suspected State wetland 923

habitats. The OHWM will be evaluated using the methodology set forth in the 2008 Field Guide to the Identification of the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) in the Arid West Region of the Western United States. These data will be recorded on the aerial photograph for use in preparing jurisdictional maps and a letter report.

A field team of regulatory specialists will re-delineate CDFW jurisdictional boundaries within the project site. All intermittent and ephemeral streams, rivers, creeks, dry washes, sloughs, blue-line streams, and watercourses with subsurface flows, canals, aqueducts, irrigation ditches, and other means of water conveyance, and lakes will be examined for indicators of CDFW jurisdiction.

These indicators include biologic components of aquatic systems (such as riparian vegetation) and physical features (such as a bed or channel, banks, levees, instream features such as logs or snags, and flood plains). Measurements of this jurisdiction will be taken at periodic intervals along the drainage and mapped onto a 200-scale topographic map. Isolated wetlands (such as vernal pools) are generally not considered to be within CDFW jurisdiction.

The Regional Board’s jurisdiction pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act will be identical to that of the Corps pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. However, where the Corps declines jurisdiction, the Regional Board will claim jurisdiction over such waters pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Act. GLA will identify and delineate any such waters and keep track of those waters separately from those within Corps jurisdiction.

TASK VI. PREPARE JURISDICTIONAL DELINEATION REPORT

A regulatory specialist will prepare a letter report to document the findings concerning Corps, Regional Board, and CDFW jurisdiction on the site. The report will document the extent of jurisdiction and assess wetland-related biological resources. Documentation will consist of (1) field data sheets (as an appendix), (2) color photographs of representative jurisdictional areas (and non- jurisdictional areas that could be mistaken for jurisdiction), (3) a topographic map (at the scale provided by the client, but not less than 200-scale) of the limits of jurisdictional areas (the map will show all points at which measurements were made and soil pits examined), and, if applicable, (4) a table showing the area of Corps, Regional Board, and CDFW jurisdiction for each drainage and tributary.

TASK VII. FORMULATE MITIGATION PLAN

Feasible measures for mitigating any impacts upon vernal pool resources resulting from project implementation will be recommended for consideration. Agency policy generally requires that: (1) on site mitigation be given full consideration, (2) mitigation be like-in-kind (to the maximum extent possible), and (3) habitat be replaced at no less than 1 to 1 by area (even if mitigation is designed so as to result in higher value habitat). Emphasis will be placed upon providing the maximum attainable compatibility between project design objectives and regulatory requirements. Off-site mitigation will be required if on site mitigation is not feasible, however, the search for suitable off- site mitigation locations is not included in this scope of work. Based on the avoided areas of existing vernal pool resources, it is likely that on-site mitigation for vernal pool impacts will be achievable.
924

After approval of recommended mitigation by the client, conceptual plans will be prepared.

Conceptual plans will include plant lists, a general description of site preparation methods, biological monitoring program, maintenance program, and other information sufficient to satisfy resource agency review requirements. A final planting plan with specifications sufficient to obtain bids for installation of the mitigation should be prepared only after obtaining approval from all the agencies; preparation of a final plan, if necessary, is not included in this scope of work. Grading, if any, for the conceptual mitigation plan will be recommended by GLA, however, final grading plans must be reviewed and approved by the client's engineer at the client's expense.

TASK VIII. PROCESS APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMIN ATION

The drainage features on site are ephemeral (i.e., are not relatively permanent, flowing, or standing bodies of water that are tributary to other waters of the United States); therefore, they are not expected to meet the current definition of waters of the United States as defined in Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 328.3(a). The mapped vernal pools on site are also likely not to be deemed wetlands under the same Corps regulations. Should the Corps decline to assert jurisdiction over the drainage features and vernal pools on site, then no Corps jurisdictional waters would be present, and no CWA Section 404 Permit would be required for the Project.

In order to secure an Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) from the Corps, GLA will prepare the AJD forms and provide the necessary backup information. If concurrence is received, the Corps would issue the AJD and No Permit Necessary Letter.

The request for an AJD may include:

• Administrative information;
• Summary information, including Section 10 of the 1899 Rivers and Harbors Act and/or Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or excluded waters and/or other features; • Other summary information, such as photographs, hydrology information, National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps;
• Stream Duration Assessment Method (SDAM) forms; and
• Information contained in the Corps’ Antecedent Precipitation Tool.

TASK IX. PREPARE STREAMBED ALTERATION NOTIFICATION

A 1602 Streambed Alteration Notification will be completed in accordance with CDFW standards and, only after review and approval by the client, submitted to the CDFW for review. As of September 1, 2020, the notifications will be submitted online through CDFW’s online portal, EPIMS. GLA will register the project on behalf of the Client (Applicant) and upload the required notification, which will include, at a minimum:

• detailed description of the proposed project, including grading plans provided by the client; • detailed description of the regulated features to be impacted by the proposed project; • discussion of approvals and certifications being obtained from other federal, state, or local agencies;
925

• conceptual mitigation plan as discussed above;
• correct notification fee as broken down by CDFW project; and • a completed CDFW notification form.

Please be aware that CDFW generally will not accept a notification unless accompanied by a draft CEQA document, and will not issue any authorization until the CEQA document has been approved and a Notice of Determination or other similar documentation is filed.

TASK X. PREPARE REQUEST FOR WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIRE MENT A 401 Water Quality Certification is only required when a project, affecting waters of the United States, requires a federal action such as a Corps permit. If there is no federal action, but waters of the state are being affected, the Regional Board requires the processing of a Waste Discharge Requirement pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Act.

In April of 2019, the State Water Resources Control Board adopted the State Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State (“Procedures”) which became effective on May 28, 20 20. The Procedures set forth the process under which each Regional Board is required to review projects result in the permanent loss of waters of the State, which includes both federal waters, subject to Section 404 jurisdiction as well as waters which are not regulated as waters of the U.S. pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. For areas subject to fill, the Procedures includes three “Tiers” under which projects are evaluated.

• Tier 1 projects include any discharge of dredged or fill material that directly impacts less than or equal to one tenth (0.1) of an acre or less than or equal to 100 linear feet of waters of the state…

• Tier 2 projects include any discharge of dredged or fill material that directly impacts more than one tenth (0.1) and less than or equal to two tenths (0.2) of an acre or more than 100 and less than or equal to 300 linear feet of waters of the state…

• Tier 3 projects include any discharge of dredged or fill material that directly impacts more than two-tenths (0.2) of an acre or 300 linear feet of waters of the state, rare, threatened or endangered species habitat in waters of the state, wetlands or eel grass beds, or Outstanding National Resource Waters or Areas of Special Biological Significance, and is not a project that inherently cannot be located at an alternate location. Tier 3 projects shall provide an analysis of off-site and on-site alternatives.

Based on the impacts described in the existing Biological Resources Technical Report prepared by Harris & Associates (2022), it is anticipated that the Project would be considered a Tier 1 project, and the level of effort prescribed to this task is based on this impact analysis.

926

Please be aware that the Regional Board will not accept an application unless accompanied by a draft CEQA document, and will not issue any authorization until the CEQA document has been approved and a Notice of Determination or other similar documentation is filed.

TASK XI. PROCESS ITP FOR CROTCH’S BUMBLE BEE

CBB is currently a Candidate listed species under CESA and while it is anticipated that the California Gish and Game Commission will make a listing determination in Q4 2025 or Q1 2026, in order for construction to proceed while the status of the species remains as is, an ITP must be processed. GLA will complete the application and provide all required supporting documentation, including a description of how the Project will fully mitigate for impacts to CBB and CBB habitat.

TASK XII. PROJECT AND REGULATORY AGENCY COORDINATIO N (T&M)

The AJD, 1602 notification, Waste Discharge Requirement, and ITP request will be coordinated with the Corps, CDFW, and Regional Board throughout processing to ensure that any potential problems are made known to the client and resolved at the earliest possible opportunity. This task also includes coordination with the engineering and/or project team on large digital file transfers and reviews. The degree of effort anticipated and included under this task is based on a reasonable and general approximation of effort. It is not feasible to know with certainty what level of coordination an agency will require because this is dependent on the specific agency personnel processing the permit and client perspectives.

TASK XIII. PREPARE CEQA ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES AS SESSMENT

CEQA Phase I Archaeological Resources Assessment (Phase I) work will consist of background research, a pedestrian field survey of the Project site, and preparation of a report documenting the findings. GLA will request an appointment to conduct an in-person records search at the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System located at San Diego State University. The SCIC, an affiliate of the California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP), is the official repository of cultural resources reports and records for Riverside County. The records search will identify recorded cultural resources and studies in, and within 0.5 mile of, the entire Project site. Local county listings, historic aerial photographs, and historic topographic maps, if available, will also be reviewed.

Following completion of the SCIC record search, a pedestrian field survey of the approximately 47- acre Project site will be conducted to identify surficial cultural resources in the Project site. It is assumed that the field survey can be completed by one archaeologist within two days. After the field survey is completed, a report will be prepared to document the Phase I methods, results, and recommendations for next steps (if any). A copy of the final report will be submitted to the SCIC in fulfillment of a requirement to access their archives.

This scope assumes that no archaeological resources will be identified in the Project site as a result of the records search or field survey. If archaeological resources are identified, GLA will notify you immediately to discuss and develop a scope and budget for additional tasks. For example, if 927

resources are identified, cultural resources would need to be recorded on State of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) Series 523 forms in accordance with the guidelines established by OHP.

GLA understands that the City has initiated coordination with Pechanga Band of Indians and assumes that representatives from Pechanga Band of Indians will request to review the draft Phase I report and will provide comments on the document. The budget for the CEQA archaeological assessment includes a total of eight hours for GLA to coordinate with Pechanga Band of Indians representatives and respond to tribal representative comments on the Phase I report. The scope does not include assistance with Native American consultation or coordination with other tribal groups.

TASK XIV. PREPARE CEQA HISTORIC RESOURCE EVALUATION

The single-family residence on the Project site was constructed in 1976 and is currently less than 50 years of age, which is the threshold or historical significance. However, an evaluation of the residence is proposed to ensure that all cultural resources aspects of the Project site are addressed in the event that certification of the CEQA document occurs in 2026, at which time the residence would be 50 years of age. To evaluate the residence, an architectural historian will conduct archival research on the history and development of the property. Research locations will include, but not be limited to, the City of Murrieta, the Riverside County Assessor’s Office, and the local public libraries. Research will utilize primary and secondary sources of information such as building permits, historic maps and photographs, newspaper articles, city directories, and written histories.

The architectural historian will also conduct an intensive ‐level field survey of this property. During
the survey, photographs will be taken of the exterior of the building and notations will be made regarding the building’s architectural style, integrity, and condition. Safe access to the property will be required to complete the survey. Access to the interior of the residence is not required.

DPR forms will be prepared, which will include an architectural description, photograph, historic context, list of references, and a significance evaluation using the California Register of Historical Resources and City criteria. Upon completion of the evaluation, the property will be assigned a California Historical Resources Status Code indicating its level of significance. Along with the DPR forms, a brief memorandum will be prepared to summarize research, field methods, and findings.

928

COST

For tasks identified as time and materials (T&M), GLA's direct expenses shall be those costs incurred directly for the CLIENT's project, including but not limited to, necessary transportation costs including mileage by automobile at the current rate allowed by IRS and subcontractor fees.

Reimbursement for these expenses shall be on the basis of actual charges when furnished by GLA.

An administrative charge of 15% shall be applied to all direct expense and subcontractor charges and is included in the cost. The table below has been developed to aid us in estimating the total cost of the proposed work; GLA reserves the right as necessary to shift costs between tasks as the work proceeds

TASK
TOTAL
COSTS
Task I. MSHCP Consistency Analysis $13,860
Task II. DBESP Analysis $13,860
Task III. Coordinate JPR (T&M) $7,260
Task IV. Coordinate DBESP Review (T&M) $7,260
Task V. Delineate Jurisdiction $8,910
Task VI. Prepare JD Report $11,220
Task VII. Formulate Mitigation Plan $14,520
Task VIII. Process AJD $8,910
Task IX. Process SAA with CDFW $8,910
Task X. Process WDR with Regional Board $8,910
Task XI. Process ITP for CBB $15,840
Task XII. Project and Agency Coordination (T&M) $16,500 Task XIII. Prepare CEQA Archaeo Res. Assessment $18,700 Task XIV. Prepare CEQA Historic Res. Assessment $8,360 TOTAL $163,020
929

1940 E Deere Avenue, Suite 250 ● Santa Ana, California 92705 ● 949.837.0404

SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES
Valid through December 31, 2025

Title Hourly Labor Rates

Technical Director $220-340
Principal-in-Charge $200-275
Project Manager
Regulatory Specialist
$95-210

$95-210
Habitat Restoration Specialist $95-210
Wildlife Biologist
Cultural Resource Specialist
$95-210

$95-210
GIS Specialist $95-210
Field Assistant $85-120
Intern $85-120
Clerical $85-110

p:2025 FEE-general_T&M

930

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WITH THE CITY OF MURRIETA (“CITY”)
Project Name/Description (“Project”): LOS ALAMOS SPORTS PARK SOCCER PROJECT Contract Number:

Consultant Name (“Consultant”): RICK
Consultant Business Type:Limited Liability Company (LLC) Consultant Address: 5620 Friars Road, San Diego, CA 92110 Consultant Representative Name and Title (“ Consultant Representative ”):Brian F. Mooney, FAICP, Principal, Planning and Design Division
Consultant Representative Work Phone and Email: 619-908-3526 [email protected]
Termination Date:June 30, 2027
Total Not-To-Exceed Contract Amount (“Contract Sum”):$184,110.00 City Department Contact (“Department Contact”):Jarrett Ramaiya, Development Services Department Contact Work Phone and Email:951 461-6069 [email protected] Is Federal Funding Being Used to Fund Any Part of The Project (Yes/No):No

931

RECITALS
The City desires to contract with a Consultant to provide professional services as more further set forth herein.

The City circulated a Request for Quotes or Proposals for the above-described professional services.

Consultant submitted a proposal to City to provide the above -described professional services.

City Staff has reviewed all the proposals and after considering the demonstrated competence of Consultant, the professional qualifications of Consultant, and the fairness and reasonableness of Consultant’s proposed cost, staff has determined that an agreem ent to provide the required services should be awarded to Consultant.

See Exhibit A for Scope of Services.

932

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WITH THE CITY OF MURRIETA (“CITY”)

THIS AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the effective on the date executed by the City by and between CITY OF MURRIETA, a California municipal corporation (“ City”) and (“ Consultant”). City and Consultant may be referred to individually as “Party” or collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “ Scope of Services ” attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “ services” or “ work” hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants: a) it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement b) all services set forth in the Scope of Services will be performed in a competent and satisfactory manner; c) all materials used for services will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended; and, d) Consultant shall follow the highest professional standards and practices in performing the services required hereunder.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the scope of services or work included in Consultant’s proposal or bid , which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal or bid, and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. No other terms and conditions from Consultant’s proposal or bid, other than description of scope of services or work, shall apply to this Agreement, unless specifically agreed to by City in writing.

1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules and regulations of City and any federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction in effect at the time services are rendered. City, and its officers, employees and agents, shall not be liable at law or in equity for failure of Consultant to comply with this Section.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder.

933

1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants Consultant: a) has thoroughly investigated and considered services to be performed, b) has carefully considered how services should be performed, and c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of services under this Agreement.

1.6 Software and Computer Services. If the Scope of Services includes the provision and/or installation of any software, computer system, or other computer technology, Consultant represents and warrants that it is familiar with and/or has inspected City’s current infrastructure, equipment, computer system and software and that the software, computer system, or other computer technology provided and/or installed by Consultant under this Agreement is compatible, and shall be fully functional, with such infrastruc ture, equipment, computer system and software of City. Consultant acknowledges that City is relying on this representation by Consultant as a material consideration in entering into this Agreement.

1.7 Prevailing Wages. If services include any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 16000 et seq. , and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws.

1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in the “Special Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the rates specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference . The total compensation for all work, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed the Contract Sum set forth above . Compensation may include reimbursement, for actual and necessary expenditures , if both are specified in the Schedule of Compensation, as well as approved by City in advance.

2.2 Invoices. Unless some other method of payment is specified in Exhibit C, Schedule of Compensation, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first business day of such month, Consultant shall submit to City, in a form approved by City’s Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. By submitting an invoice for payment under this Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of this 934

Agreement. Except as provided in Section s 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement generally within thirty (30) days, and City will use its best efforts to make payment no later than forty -five (45) days, from the submission of an invoice in an approved form. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. Each invoice is to include (unless otherwise specified by City) : 1) line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate; 2) line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services; 3) line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation ; and 4) l ine items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.0 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.1 Term. The Agreement shall commence and become effective upon the date executed by the City and will continue until the Termination Date. This Agreement may be extended for up to two, additional one -year periods upon the mutual agreement in writing of both parties.

Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of any ongoing services, which shall be no later than the Termination Date set forth above.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Indemnification and Insurance provisions set forth in Article 5 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed from City and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in the “Schedule of Performance” attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by this reference.

3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify City in writing of the causes of the delay. City shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of City such delay is justified. City’s determination shall be final 935

and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of this Agreement pursuant to this Section.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representative of Consultant. The Consultant Representative is authorized to act on Consultant’s behalf with respect to the work or services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the representative was a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City.

4.2 Department Contact for City . The Department Contact (or other person designated by the City Manager) shall be the primary person on behalf of City responsible for the administration of the Agreement. It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the Department Contact is kept informed of both the progress of the performance of the services as well as any decisions which must be made by City.

4.3 Approvals from City. City approvals or actions, pursuant to the authority of this Agreement, are to be made (unless otherwise specified) either by the Contract Manager, City Manager or by their delegate as provided for in writing.

4.4 Independent Co ntractor. Neither City , nor any of its officers, employees or agents, shall have any control over the manner or means by which Consultant , or its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors , perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain under only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it, or any of its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, are officers, employees or agents of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to City pursuant to this Agreement shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive control and direction.

No City employee benefits shall be available to Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, in connection with the performance of this Agreement.

City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant , its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. In the event that Consultant or any officer, 936

employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, to be classified as other than an independent contractor for City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant , or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor Consultant used to provide services under this Agreement, is/are employees of City.

4.5 Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant, its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, without express written approval of City, Consultant shall not contract with any other City to perform in whole or in part services required hereunder without express written approval of City , and n either this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred or assigned. No approved transfer shall release Consultant, or any surety or insured of Consultant, of any liability hereunder without express written consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages. Prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, and without limiting Consultant’s indemnification obligation to City, Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, for the duration of the Agreement, primary policies of insurance of the type and amounts set forth in the “Insurance Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit E and incorporated herein by this reference.

5.2 Indemnification.
(a) General Obligations. Consultant agrees, to the full extent permitted by law, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents (each an “ Indemnitee” and collectively, “ Indemnitees”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual or threatened, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein “ Claims or Liabilities ”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or City arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or City for which Consultant is legally liable (each an “Indemnitor” and collectively, “ Indemnitors”), or arising from Indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith: 1) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed or threatened in connection with any such Claims or Liabilities, or at option of Indemnitee(s) will reimburse and pay for all costs and expenses, including 937

legal costs and attorneys’ fees, incurred by Indemnitee(s) in connection therewith; and, 2) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against Indemnitee(s) for any such Claims or Liabilities, and will save and hold Indemnitee(s) harmless therefrom.
(b) Further Provisions. The indemnity obligation herein shall be binding on successors, assigns and heirs of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements as provided herein with its subcontractors, and if Consultant fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefor. Failure of City and/or City Parties (collectively “City” for solely this Section 5. 2(b)) to monitor compliance with any of the indemnification provisions herein shall not be a waiver hereof. The indemnification provisions herein do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful misconduct, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professi onal. The indemnification provided herein includes Claims or Liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services hereunder. Payment of invoi ces by City is not a condition precedent to enforcement of the indemnity obligation herein. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and City, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, Consultant will be o bligated to pay for City’s defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City as solely negligent or responsible for willful misconduct. Consultant will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation. (c) Pursuant to the full language of California Civil Code §2782, Design Professionals agrees to indemnify, including the cost to defend, City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, or liability that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Design Professional and its empl oyees or agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages arising from the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful acts of the City; and does not apply to any passive negligence of the City unless caused at least in part by the Design Professional. The City agrees that in no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Design Professional exceed that professional’s proportionate percentage of fault. This duty to indemnify shall not be waived or modified by contractual agreement or acts of the parties.

5.3 Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Indemnitees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from , whether actual or threatened, any and all Claims and Liabilities, consistent with all obligations provided for in this Section

5.3, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful 938

act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (“books and records ”) as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable City to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such books and records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, shall be complete and detailed, and shall be readily accessible . City shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts. Such books and records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder. City shall have access to such books and records in the event any audit is required. Consultant shall fully cooperate with City in providing access to any and all Consultant records and documents if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (“ documents and materials ”) prepared by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of City and/or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership , use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant may retain copies of such documents and materials for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents and materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, with respect to any Consultant documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for City.

6.3 Confidentiality and Release of Information. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from City. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior wri tten authorization from City or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other 939

information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant immediately gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. As concerning, r egarding or related to, in any way, this Agreement and the work performed thereunder: a) Consultant shall immediately notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admiss ions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party ; b) City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding; and, c) Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant , however, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Riverside, State of California.

7.2 Suspension, or Termination, Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section

7.4 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate or suspend this Agreement, or any portion hereof, at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, upon ten (10) days’ notice to Consultant, except that where termination or suspension is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as determined by City. Upon receipt of any notice of termination or suspension, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder , unless the notice provides otherwise, or except such as specifically approved by City. Upon submittal of an invoice consistent with Section 2. 2, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination or suspension and for any services authorized by City thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation, or such a s may be approved by City, except as provided in Section 7.5. In event of termination , or suspension, 940

without cause pursuant to this Section, there is no need to provide opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.3.

7.3 Default of Consultant and Opportunity to Cure . In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively t en (10) days, but may be extended, or reduced, if circumstances warrant, as determined by City. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices , without liability for interest. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default by conclusion of noticed timeframe , City may immediately both terminate this Agreement with notice to Consultant as well as pursue the remedy in Section 7.4, without prejudice to any other rem edy to which City may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement . Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Consultant’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.4 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.3, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such dama ges), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed City therefor.

7.5 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, cost s, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.

941

7.6 Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non -defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non -compliance with any requirement of this Agreement imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

7.7 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.8 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code sections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees. If either Party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether lega l or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys ’ fees. Attorneys’ fees shall include attorneys ’ fees on any appeal, and a Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, consultants’ fees, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such 942

litigation. Such fees and costs shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY, CONFLICTS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performan ce of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of City. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. City, in its sole discretion, shall determine the existence of a conflict of interest and may terminate this Agreement in the event such a conflict of interest exists upon sending Consultant written notice describing the conflict. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects their financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which they are, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, r eligion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices. Any notice or other communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person in regards to this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the Uni ted States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, in the case of 943

City addressed to City Clerk at City of Murrieta, 1 Town Square, Murrieta California 92562, and in the case of Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the cover page of this Agreement. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy -two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement , headings used, or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the Parties as to the Agreement . It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement, and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties, concerning this Agreement, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City.

9.5 Severability. Should a portion of this Agreement be declared invalid or unenforceable by a judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 No Undue Influence. Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer or employee of City in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of City has or will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the awar d of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to remedies in Section 7.4 and any and all remedies at law or equity.

9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party, 944

(iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

9.8 Federal Funding. If federal funding is being utilized to fund any part of the Project, as indicated on the Cover Page of this Agreement, the terms of Exhibit F are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. If no federal funding is being utilized, Exhibit F may be omitted.

[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
945

01375.0001/962082.2 -15-

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CITY:

CITY OF MURRIETA, a California municipal
corporation
By:

Justin Clifton, City Manager
ATTEST: Effective Date:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
Date:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ALESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP

Tiffany Israel, City Attorney
Date:

CONSULTANT:

Two corporate officer signatures required when Consultant is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chair person of the Board,
President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any
Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any
Assistant Treasurer. (Cal. Corp. Code § 313.) Appropriate attestations shall be included as may be required by the bylaws, articles of incorporation or other rules or
regulations applicable to Consultant’s business City.

By:

Name:

Title:

Date:

By:

Name:

Title:

Date:
946

01375.0001/962082.2

EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services:

Preparation of conceptual grading plan, drainage, surveying, and preparation of the environmental documents.

II. In addition to any other requirements of this Agreement, during performance of the Services, Consultant will keep the City appraised of the status of performance by delivering the following status reports:

Boundary survey, conceptual plans and technical reports, and environmental documents.

III. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.

IV. Consultant will utilize the following personnel to accomplish the Services:

See proposal.

947
Mr. Jarrett Ramaiya
May 15, 2025

Page 1 of 14 ends

Murrieta City CouncilAugust 19, 2025

Murrieta City Council
August 19, 2025