Agenda packet — Murrieta City Council, June 2, 2026 (part 2 of 5)

RR 5/08/09
2 APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________
Tiffany Israel, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§

CITY OF MURRIETA )
I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 26-4937 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Murrieta at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of June, 2026, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

158
159
160
161
162
163
ORDINANCE NO. 633-26

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT

BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA AND THE

BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO INCLUDE PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES’ PENSION REFORM ACT (PEPRA) LANGUAGE

Summary: This ordinance approves an amendment to the City’s contract with the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to reference Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) language.

WHEREAS, the City of Murrieta (the “City”) participates in the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) pursuant to a contract with the Board of Administration of CalPERS (the “Board”); and

WHEREAS, the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (“PEPRA”) established new requirements and limitations applicable to public retirement systems and participating agencies, including provisions governing pensionable compensation and benefit structures; and

WHEREAS, the City desires to ensure that its CalPERS contract provisions are consistent with and fully compliant with the requirements of PEPRA and applicable state law; and

WHEREAS, the Board has requested that participating agencies amend their contracts to expressly incorporate and clarify compliance with PEPRA provisions where necessary; and

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Murrieta has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to approve an amendment to its contract with CalPERS to incorporate PEPRA language and ensure continued participation in the CalPERS retirement system in accordance with state law.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Murrieta and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.

SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of the City of Murrieta.

SECTION 3. This ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA only 164
Ordinance No. 633-26

Page 2 of 3 ends

applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Where, as here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question would have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective on the thirty -first (31st) day after its passage and adoption, and within fifteen (15) days after its final passage and the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted and published in a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City in the manner required by law and shall cause a copy of this Ordinance and its certification, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ______, 2026.

Jon Levell, Mayor

ATTEST:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Tiffany J. Israel, City Attorney

165
Ordinance No. 633-26

Page 3 of 3 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§

CITY OF MURRIETA )

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 633-26 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Murrieta at the regular meeting thereof, held on the ____ day of ____, 2026, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California further certify that Ordinance No. 633-26 was duly published according to law and the order of the City Council of said City and the same was so published in Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation on the following date(s):

Introduced Ordinance:

Adopted Ordinance:

In witness whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name this ___ day of ____, 2026.

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
166
167
168
169
170
171
01375.0004 2131753.1
RESOLUTION NO. MFD 26-227

A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

THE MURRIETA FIRE DISTRICT TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO

CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE

BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MURRIETA FIRE DISTRICT

WHEREAS, the Public Employees’ Retirement Law permits the participation of public agencies and their employees in the Public Employees’ Retirement System by the execution of a contract, and sets forth the procedure by which said public agencies may elect to subject themselves and their employees to amendments to said law; and

WHEREAS, one of the steps in the procedures to amend this contract is the adoption by the governing body of the public agency of a resolution giving notice of its intention to approve an amendment to said contract, which resolution shall contain a summary of the changes proposed in said contract; and

WHEREAS, the following is a statement of the proposed change:

To include language from the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MURRIETA
FIRE DISTRICT DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. That the Board of Directors of the Murrieta Fire Protection District gives notice of the intention to approve an amendment to the contract between the Board of Directors of the Murrieta Fire Protection District and the Board of Administration of the Public Employees’ Retirement System, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, as an “Exhibit A” and by this reference made a part hereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 2026.

____________________________
Jon Levell, Chair
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Cristal McDonald, Secretary

172
Resolution No. MFD 26-227

Page 2 of 2 ends

RR 5/08/09
2 01375.0004 2131753.1
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

_____________________________
Tiffany Israel, General Counsel

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§

CITY OF MURRIETA )
I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. MFD 26-227 was duly passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Murrieta Fire District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 2nd day of June, 2026, and was signed by the Chair of the said Board, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Cristal McDonald, Secretary

173
174
175
176
177
01375.0004 2131751.1
ORDINANCE NO. 634-26

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE MURRIETA FIRE DISTRICT APPROVING

AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF

DIRECTORS OF THE MURRIETA FIRE DISTRICT AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO INCLUDE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ PENSION

REFORM ACT (PEPRA) LANGUAGE

Summary: This ordinance approves an amendment to the Murrieta Fire District’s contract with the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) to reference Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) language.

WHEREAS, the Murrieta Fire District (the “District”) participates in the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (“CalPERS”) pursuant to a contract with the Board of Administration of CalPERS (the “Board”); and

WHEREAS, the District desires to ensure that its CalPERS contract provisions are consistent with and fully compliant with the requirements of PEPRA and applicable state law; and

WHEREAS, the Board has requested that participating agencies amend their contracts to expressly incorporate and clarify compliance with PEPRA provisions where necessary; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Murrieta Fire District has determined that it is in the best interest of the District to approve an amendment to its contract with CalPERS to incorporate PEPRA language and ensure continued participation in the CalPERS retirement system in accordance with state law.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. That an amendment to the contract between the Board of Directors of the Murrieta Fire District and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, is hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit A, and by such reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.

SECTION 2. The Chair of the Murrieta Board of Directors of the Murrieta Fire District is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed to execute said amendment for and on behalf of the Murrieta Fire District.

178
Ordinance No. 634-26

Page 2 of 3 ends

01375.0004 2131751.1

SECTION 3. This ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which provides that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environmen t.

Where, as here, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question would have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

The Board of Directors hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____day of ________, 2026.

Jon Levell, Mayor

ATTEST:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Tiffany J. Israel, City Attorney

179
Ordinance No. 634-26

Page 3 of 3 ends

01375.0004 2131751.1

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§

CITY OF MURRIETA )

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 634-26 was duly passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Murrieta Fire Protection District at the regular meeting thereof, held on the ____ day of _____, 2026, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California further certify that Ordinance No. 634-26 was duly published according to law and the order of the City Council of said City and the same was so published in Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation on the following date(s):

Introduced Ordinance:

Adopted Ordinance:

In witness whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name this 2nd day of June, 2026.

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
180
181
182
183
184

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 6.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brian Crawford, Municipal Services Director
PREPARED BY: Garrett Strang, Capital Projects Program Manager SUBJECT:

Award Construction Contract for the Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Program 2026, CIP No. 13064, MSD Project No. 26-003

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this item is to award the construction contract for the Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Program to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, find the project to be exempt from CEQA, and amend the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget to reallocate available savings from prior years’Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Projects into CIP No. 13064.

RECOMMENDATION
Amend the Capital Improvement Plan Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26 by transferring the Measure A remaining funding from CIP Nos. 8293, 13051, and 13073 in the combined amount of $625,618.28 into CIP No. 13064; Find the Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Program 2026, CIP No. 13064, MSD Project No. 26-003, to be exempt from CEQA and award the construction contract to Carter Enterprises Group, Inc., dba Pavement Rehab Company, in the amount of $411,888;
Authorize a 15% construction contingency of $61,783.20; Authorize the Director of Municipal Services, or his designee, to approve contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the contract amount; and
Authorize the Mayor to execute the construction contract.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On June 3, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. 25-4836, approving the Capital Improvement Plan Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26, and the Fiscal Year 2025/26 to 2029/30 Capital Improvement Plan, which included the Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Projects CIP Nos. 8293, 13051, 13064, and 13073 (Vote 5-0).

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
This item aligns with the City Council goal of: planning, programming and creating infrastructure development relating to priority Tier 1. This project includes the correction of approximately 400 ADA barriers throughout the CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
185
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 6.
relating to priority Tier 1. This project includes the correction of approximately 400 ADA barriers throughout the City.

DISCUSSION
The Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Program 2026, CIP No. 13064, consists of the removal and replacement of various damaged sidewalk panels, grinding of raised sidewalk panel lips, miscellaneous asphalt repairs, and other ancillary improvements at various citywide locations mainly along the corridor of Whitewood Road, between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and the northern city limits near Mapleton Street. This project aims to improve access for all Murrieta residents and ensure that pedestrian paths of travel comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This project is funded with Measure A (Fund 302) funds.

Staff combined CIP Project Nos. 8293, 13051, 13064, and 13073, and advertised as one (1) project under CIP No. 13064 to allow for greater efficiency in construction and to achieve a more desirable economy of scale.

Staff recommends reallocating the balance of unspent Measure A fund from other years’Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Projects into CIP No. 13064, bringing the total Measure A balance in CIP No. 13064 to $675,618.28. A breakdown of the reallocation of Measure A funds from various Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Projects into CIP No. 13064 is as follows:

CIP No./Funding Source Project Balance
CIP No. 8293/Measure A $525,618.28
CIP No. 13051/Measure A $50,000
CIP No. 13064/Measure A (Existing Balance) $50,000
CIP No. 13073/Measure A $50,000
Total Funding Available for CIP 13064: $675,618.28
The project includes removal and replacement of existing sidewalk panels, concrete grinding, asphalt repairs, and other ancillary work at the following location:
· Base Bid - Whitewood Rd. between Murrieta Hot Springs Rd. and Los Alamos Rd. · Additive Bid 1 - Whitewood Rd. between Los Alamos Rd. and Hunter Rd. · Additive Bid 2 - Whitewood Rd. between Hunter Rd. and the Northern City Limits · Additive Bid 3 - Various Citywide Locations

PROJECT BIDDING AND DETERMINATION
The City advertised the project on April 8, 2026, and received a total of 11 construction bids on April 30, 2026.

The basis of the bid for determining the low bidder was defined in the specifications as the sum of the total Base Bid Items and all Additive Bid Items. The bid results are as follows:

Bidder Base Bid Items +
Additive Bid Items

1. Carter Enterprises Group, Inc. dba Pavement Rehab Co. $411,888.00

2. Gentry General Engineering, Inc. $424,781.10

3. DT Stellar General Engineering $448,971.00

4. Van Engineering, Inc. $464,338.60

5. Ethics Landscape Construction, Inc. $505,603.74

6. LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. $539,062.50

7. Sael Construction Corporation $589,388.00

8. Leonida Builders, Inc $631,440.55

9. No Limit Construction $639,958.75

10. S&H Civilworks $697,547.00

11. Marin Concrete Construction, Inc. $1,530,734.73
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
186
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 6.

Bidder Base Bid Items +
Additive Bid Items

1. Carter Enterprises Group, Inc. dba Pavement Rehab Co. $411,888.00

2. Gentry General Engineering, Inc. $424,781.10

3. DT Stellar General Engineering $448,971.00

4. Van Engineering, Inc. $464,338.60

5. Ethics Landscape Construction, Inc. $505,603.74

6. LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. $539,062.50

7. Sael Construction Corporation $589,388.00

8. Leonida Builders, Inc $631,440.55

9. No Limit Construction $639,958.75

10. S&H Civilworks $697,547.00

11. Marin Concrete Construction, Inc. $1,530,734.73
Staff elected to utilize Additive Bids 1, 2, and 3 (Bid Items 13 through 38). Bid Items 13 through 38 were advertised on the Bid Sheet as Additive Bids to allow the City to analyze the bid items’costs and either accept or reject any or all the additive bids based on the final cost of the overall project and the availability of funding.

The low bid cost came in favorably, and sufficient funding is available for the Base Bid and all Additive Bids.

Therefore, staff recommends awarding the full bid amount.

Staff have reviewed the bids and determined that the item prices are consistent with today’sconstruction market. Staff recommends that the construction contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, Carter Enterprises Group, Inc., dba Pavement Rehab Company, in the amount of $411,888.00, for the total Base Bid and Additive Bids 1, 2, and 3 (Bid Items 13 through 38), plus a 15% construction contingency of $61,783.20, for a total of $473,671.20.

PUBLIC NOTICING
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

CEQA AND REGULATORY OVERVIEW
Staff recommends exemption of this project from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15302 (Class 2 Categorical Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines because this project involves “replacement or reconstruction” of existing infrastructure or facilities and is on the same site and serves the same purpose and capacity as the facility being replaced without expanded use.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact for the approval of the construction contract is $411,888, plus a 15% contingency amount of $61,783.20, for a total not to exceed amount of $473,671.20. Funding will be available in CIP No. 13064 after the successful reallocation and transfer of available Measure A funds from CIP Nos. 8293, 13051, and 13073 in the combined amount of $625,618.28 to CIP No. 13064.

If City Council approves the construction contract, staff recommends an amendment to the FY 2025/26 CIP Budget for FY 2025/26 and the FY 2025/26 to 2029/30 Capital Improvement Plan to reallocate the balance of Measure A funds from CIP Nos. 8293, 13051, and 13073 in the combined amount of $625,618.28 into CIP No. 13064.

ATTACHMENTS
ATT 1 - Contract between the City of Murrieta and Carter Enterprises Group, Inc dba Pavement Rehab Co.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
187
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 6.

ATT 2 - Proposal from Carter Enterprises Group, Inc dba Pavement Rehab Co.

ATT 3 - Bid Results Summary
ATT 4 - Vicinity Map
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price % of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price
Median Total
Price
Average Total
Price
Average % of
Total Bid Price
Base Bid - Whitewood Road: Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Los Alamos Road 1 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Base Bid price) LS 1 $21,455.80 $21,455.80 5.21% $18,624.00 $18,624.00 4.38% $7,000.00 $7,000.00 1.56% $25,000.00 $25,000.00 5.38% $8,387.00 $8,387.00 1.66% $12,000.00 $12,000.00 2.23% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $34,190.42 $34,190.42 5.41% $32,000.00 $32,000.00 5.00% $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2.15% $94,392.00 $94,392.00 6.17% $18,624.00 $24,640.84 3.61% 2 Traffic Control System LS 1 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 4.13% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.89% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $33,000.00 $33,000.00 6.12% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $33,000.00 $33,000.00 5.23% $25,000.00 $25,000.00 3.91% $20,000.00 $20,000.00 2.87% $26,130.00 $26,130.00 1.71% $17,000.00 $16,750.27 2.77% 3 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.21% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.67% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.08% $4,676.00 $4,676.00 0.92% $16,500.00 $16,500.00 3.06% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.63% $6,500.00 $6,500.00 1.02% $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2.15% $23,180.00 $23,180.00 1.51% $5,000.00 $7,888.91 1.19% 4 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.21% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $4,500.00 $4,500.00 1.00% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.75% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $7,000.00 $7,000.00 1.30% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $12,000.00 $12,000.00 1.90% $5,500.00 $5,500.00 0.86% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $19,205.00 $19,205.00 1.25% $5,000.00 $6,044.36 0.90% 5 Project Information Sign EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $2,328.00 $2,328.00 0.55% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.56% $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.32% $770.00 $770.00 0.15% $1,325.00 $1,325.00 0.25% $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.25% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.32% $1,200.00 $1,200.00 0.19% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $3,637.00 $3,637.00 0.24% $1,500.00 $2,069.09 0.34% 6 Concrete Removal SF 7979 $5.00 $39,895.00 9.69% $3.85 $30,719.15 7.23% $8.00 $63,832.00 14.22% $3.00 $23,937.00 5.16% $5.61 $44,762.19 8.85% $5.00 $39,895.00 7.40% $5.00 $39,895.00 6.77% $4.00 $31,916.00 5.05% $7.45 $59,443.55 9.29% $3.00 $23,937.00 3.43% $21.97 $175,298.63 11.45% $39,895.00 $52,139.14 8.05% 7 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 7879 $11.00 $86,669.00 21.04% $7.00 $55,153.00 12.98% $10.00 $78,790.00 17.55% $10.00 $78,790.00 16.97% $10.48 $82,571.92 16.33% $10.50 $82,729.50 15.35% $11.00 $86,669.00 14.70% $12.00 $94,548.00 14.97% $17.75 $139,852.25 21.85% $10.00 $78,790.00 11.30% $29.44 $231,957.76 15.15% $82,729.50 $99,683.68 16.20% 8 Type A-6 PCC Curb and Gutter, City Std. 301 LF 100 $100.00 $10,000.00 2.43% $51.00 $5,100.00 1.20% $75.00 $7,500.00 1.67% $20.00 $2,000.00 0.43% $80.94 $8,094.00 1.60% $58.00 $5,800.00 1.08% $140.00 $14,000.00 2.38% $60.00 $6,000.00 0.95% $98.00 $9,800.00 1.53% $150.00 $15,000.00 2.15% $128.48 $12,848.00 0.84% $8,094.00 $8,740.18 1.48% 9 Concrete Sidewalk ADA Grinding, MSD Std. 100 (4' - 6' Sidewalk Width) EA 35 $100.00 $3,500.00 0.85% $134.00 $4,690.00 1.10% $220.00 $7,700.00 1.72% $500.00 $17,500.00 3.77% $239.00 $8,365.00 1.65% $330.00 $11,550.00 2.14% $500.00 $17,500.00 2.97% $120.00 $4,200.00 0.67% $255.00 $8,925.00 1.39% $5,500.00 $192,500.00 27.60% $215.77 $7,551.95 0.49% $8,365.00 $25,816.54 4.03% 10 Remove and Dispose of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (6.5" AC Digouts) SF 1834 $3.65 $6,694.10 1.63% $9.50 $17,423.00 4.10% $8.00 $14,672.00 3.27% $2.50 $4,585.00 0.99% $7.80 $14,305.20 2.83% $5.25 $9,628.50 1.79% $12.00 $22,008.00 3.73% $6.00 $11,004.00 1.74% $7.05 $12,929.70 2.02% $5.00 $9,170.00 1.31% $24.66 $45,226.44 2.95% $12,929.70 $15,240.54 2.40% 11 Asphalt Concrete Pavement for Removal and Replacement of AC (Digouts) TON 82 $200.00 $16,400.00 3.98% $279.00 $22,878.00 5.39% $185.00 $15,170.00 3.38% $250.00 $20,500.00 4.41% $432.00 $35,424.00 7.01% $200.00 $16,400.00 3.04% $520.00 $42,640.00 7.23% $404.00 $33,128.00 5.25% $215.00 $17,630.00 2.75% $150.00 $12,300.00 1.76% $876.70 $71,889.40 4.70% $20,500.00 $27,669.04 4.45% 12 Install Pavement Striping Detail 39 (Paint) LF 200 $10.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $13.00 $2,600.00 0.61% $18.00 $3,600.00 0.80% $2.20 $440.00 0.09% $14.00 $2,800.00 0.55% $34.00 $6,800.00 1.26% $30.00 $6,000.00 1.02% $20.00 $4,000.00 0.63% $5.00 $1,000.00 0.16% $20.00 $4,000.00 0.57% $17.52 $3,504.00 0.23% $3,504.00 $3,340.36 0.58% Additive Bid 1 - Whitewood Road: Los Alamos Road to Hunter Road Subtotal $214,613.90 $172,592.15 $212,264.00 $192,752.00 $214,906.31 $242,628.00 $240,212.00 $269,986.42 $319,780.50 $395,697.00 $714,820.18 13 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Additive Bid 1 Price) LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.61% $13,803.00 $13,803.00 3.25% $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.89% $15,000.00 $15,000.00 3.23% $7,379.00 $7,379.00 1.46% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.86% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $22,714.03 $22,714.03 3.60% $6,000.00 $6,000.00 0.94% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $47,536.00 $47,536.00 3.11% $7,379.00 $12,448.37 1.83% 14 Traffic Control System LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.97% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.89% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $16,500.00 $16,500.00 3.06% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $27,000.00 $27,000.00 4.28% $11,000.00 $11,000.00 1.72% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.43% $12,701.00 $12,701.00 0.83% $10,000.00 $10,120.36 1.71% 15 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.45% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $4,675.00 $4,675.00 0.92% $9,750.00 $9,750.00 1.81% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.79% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $11,222.00 $11,222.00 0.73% $2,500.00 $4,297.18 0.67% 16 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.22% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.65% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.58% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $9,316.00 $9,316.00 0.61% $2,200.00 $3,572.64 0.53% 17 Concrete Removal SF 1581 $5.00 $7,905.00 1.92% $3.60 $5,691.60 1.34% $8.00 $12,648.00 2.82% $5.00 $7,905.00 1.70% $5.61 $8,869.41 1.75% $5.25 $8,300.25 1.54% $6.00 $9,486.00 1.61% $4.00 $6,324.00 1.00% $7.45 $11,778.45 1.84% $5.00 $7,905.00 1.13% $24.31 $38,434.11 2.51% $8,300.25 $11,386.07 1.74% 18 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 1581 $11.00 $17,391.00 4.22% $7.00 $11,067.00 2.61% $10.00 $15,810.00 3.52% $10.00 $15,810.00 3.40% $10.48 $16,568.88 3.28% $9.50 $15,019.50 2.79% $12.00 $18,972.00 3.22% $12.00 $18,972.00 3.00% $17.75 $28,062.75 4.39% $10.00 $15,810.00 2.27% $32.58 $51,508.98 3.36% $16,568.88 $20,453.83 3.28% 19 Concrete Sidewalk ADA Grinding, MSD Std. 100 (4' - 6' Sidewalk Width) EA 24 $100.00 $2,400.00 0.58% $112.00 $2,688.00 0.63% $220.00 $5,280.00 1.18% $400.00 $9,600.00 2.07% $239.00 $5,736.00 1.13% $330.00 $7,920.00 1.47% $500.00 $12,000.00 2.04% $120.00 $2,880.00 0.46% $255.00 $6,120.00 0.96% $750.00 $18,000.00 2.58% $238.78 $5,730.72 0.37% $5,736.00 $7,123.16 1.22% 20 Remove and Dispose of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (6.5" AC Digouts) SF 3410 $3.65 $12,446.50 3.02% $11.30 $38,533.00 9.07% $8.00 $27,280.00 6.08% $4.00 $13,640.00 2.94% $7.80 $26,598.00 5.26% $5.25 $17,902.50 3.32% $12.00 $40,920.00 6.94% $6.00 $20,460.00 3.24% $7.05 $24,040.50 3.76% $5.00 $17,050.00 2.44% $27.29 $93,058.90 6.08% $24,040.50 $30,175.40 4.74% 21 Asphalt Concrete Pavement for Removal and Replacement of AC (Digouts) TON 153 $200.00 $30,600.00 7.43% $251.00 $38,403.00 9.04% $185.00 $28,305.00 6.30% $250.00 $38,250.00 8.24% $432.00 $66,096.00 13.07% $200.00 $30,600.00 5.68% $520.00 $79,560.00 13.50% $404.00 $61,812.00 9.79% $215.00 $32,895.00 5.14% $200.00 $30,600.00 4.39% $647.90 $99,128.70 6.48% $38,250.00 $48,749.97 8.10% 22 Install Pavement Striping Detail 39 (Paint) LF 313 $10.00 $3,130.00 0.76% $13.00 $4,069.00 0.96% $11.00 $3,443.00 0.77% $2.20 $688.60 0.15% $14.00 $4,382.00 0.87% $17.00 $5,321.00 0.99% $30.00 $9,390.00 1.59% $13.42 $4,200.46 0.67% $5.00 $1,565.00 0.24% $25.00 $7,825.00 1.12% $17.41 $5,449.33 0.36% $4,200.46 $4,496.67 0.77% Additive Bid 2 - Whitewood Road: Hunter Road to North City Limits Subtotal $82,372.50 $127,331.60 $103,766.00 $115,893.60 $145,055.29 $124,813.25 $180,328.00 $179,362.49 $125,861.70 $122,190.00 $374,085.74 23 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Additive Bid 2 Price) LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $6,089.00 $6,089.00 1.43% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.56% $8,000.00 $8,000.00 1.72% $7,379.00 $7,379.00 1.46% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.86% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $7,259.28 $7,259.28 1.15% $6,500.00 $6,500.00 1.02% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $15,415.00 $15,415.00 1.01% $6,500.00 $6,649.30 1.08% 24 Traffic Control System LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.56% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $16,000.00 $16,000.00 2.97% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $12,000.00 $12,000.00 1.90% $6,000.00 $6,000.00 0.94% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.43% $4,530.00 $4,530.00 0.30% $6,000.00 $7,104.82 1.27% 25 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.45% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.75% $4,675.00 $4,675.00 0.92% $9,750.00 $9,750.00 1.81% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.48% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $4,003.00 $4,003.00 0.26% $3,000.00 $3,640.91 0.63% 26 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.22% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.65% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.63% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $3,323.00 $3,323.00 0.22% $2,200.00 $2,482.36 0.41% 27 Concrete Removal SF 1709 $5.00 $8,545.00 2.07% $3.65 $6,237.85 1.47% $8.00 $13,672.00 3.05% $4.00 $6,836.00 1.47% $5.61 $9,587.49 1.90% $5.25 $8,972.25 1.66% $6.00 $10,254.00 1.74% $4.00 $6,836.00 1.08% $7.45 $12,732.05 1.99% $5.00 $8,545.00 1.23% $24.31 $41,545.79 2.71% $8,972.25 $12,160.31 1.85% 28 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 1709 $11.00 $18,799.00 4.56% $7.00 $11,963.00 2.82% $10.00 $17,090.00 3.81% $10.00 $17,090.00 3.68% $10.48 $17,910.32 3.54% $9.50 $16,235.50 3.01% $12.00 $20,508.00 3.48% $12.00 $20,508.00 3.25% $17.75 $30,334.75 4.74% $10.00 $17,090.00 2.45% $32.58 $55,679.22 3.64% $17,910.32 $22,109.80 3.54% 29 Concrete Sidewalk ADA Grinding, MSD Std. 100 (4' - 6' Sidewalk Width) EA 31 $100.00 $3,100.00 0.75% $112.00 $3,472.00 0.82% $220.00 $6,820.00 1.52% $500.00 $15,500.00 3.34% $239.00 $7,409.00 1.47% $330.00 $10,230.00 1.90% $500.00 $15,500.00 2.63% $120.00 $3,720.00 0.59% $255.00 $7,905.00 1.24% $750.00 $23,250.00 3.33% $238.78 $7,402.18 0.48% $7,409.00 $9,482.56 1.64% Additive Bid 3 - Various Citywide Locations Subtotal $35,444.00 $40,838.85 $45,582.00 $63,426.00 $51,711.81 $74,687.75 $57,262.00 $57,323.28 $67,871.80 $73,885.00 $131,898.19 30 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Additive Bid 3 Price) LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $9,946.00 $9,946.00 2.34% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.67% $12,000.00 $12,000.00 2.58% $7,379.00 $7,379.00 1.46% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.86% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $15,800.36 $15,800.36 2.50% $10,500.00 $10,500.00 1.64% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $36,222.00 $36,222.00 2.37% $9,946.00 $10,440.67 1.56% 31 Traffic Control System LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.67% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $11,400.00 $11,400.00 2.11% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $18,000.00 $18,000.00 2.85% $8,500.00 $8,500.00 1.33% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.43% $10,645.00 $10,645.00 0.70% $10,000.00 $8,151.64 1.38% 32 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.45% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.08% $4,675.00 $4,675.00 0.92% $9,750.00 $9,750.00 1.81% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.48% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $9,406.00 $9,406.00 0.61% $3,000.00 $4,268.45 0.69% 33 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.33% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.65% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $6,000.00 $6,000.00 0.95% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $7,808.00 $7,808.00 0.51% $2,200.00 $3,117.36 0.47% 34 Concrete Removal SF 3179 $5.00 $15,895.00 3.86% $4.50 $14,305.50 3.37% $8.00 $25,432.00 5.66% $4.00 $12,716.00 2.74% $5.61 $17,834.19 3.53% $3.50 $11,126.50 2.06% $6.00 $19,074.00 3.24% $4.00 $12,716.00 2.01% $7.45 $23,683.55 3.70% $5.00 $15,895.00 2.28% $24.31 $77,281.49 5.05% $15,895.00 $22,359.93 3.41% 35 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 2992 $11.00 $32,912.00 7.99% $7.00 $20,944.00 4.93% $10.00 $29,920.00 6.66% $10.00 $29,920.00 6.44% $10.48 $31,356.16 6.20% $9.50 $28,424.00 5.27% $12.00 $35,904.00 6.09% $12.00 $35,904.00 5.69% $17.75 $53,108.00 8.30% $10.00 $29,920.00 4.29% $32.58 $97,479.36 6.37% $31,356.16 $38,708.32 6.20% 36 Type A-6 PCC Curb and Gutter, City Std. 301 LF 187 $100.00 $18,700.00 4.54% $51.00 $9,537.00 2.25% $75.00 $14,025.00 3.12% $65.00 $12,155.00 2.62% $80.94 $15,135.78 2.99% $31.00 $5,797.00 1.08% $140.00 $26,180.00 4.44% $60.00 $11,220.00 1.78% $98.00 $18,326.00 2.86% $150.00 $28,050.00 4.02% $142.19 $26,589.53 1.74% $15,135.78 $16,883.21 2.86% 37 Remove and Dispose of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (4" AC Digouts) SF 644 $3.65 $2,350.60 0.57% $11.25 $7,245.00 1.71% $8.00 $5,152.00 1.15% $4.00 $2,576.00 0.55% $7.80 $5,023.20 0.99% $14.00 $9,016.00 1.67% $12.00 $7,728.00 1.31% $12.00 $7,728.00 1.22% $6.30 $4,057.20 0.63% $5.00 $3,220.00 0.46% $34.11 $21,966.84 1.44% $5,152.00 $6,914.80 1.06% 38 Asphalt Concrete Pavement for Removal and Replacement of AC (Digouts) TON 18 $200.00 $3,600.00 0.87% $498.00 $8,964.00 2.11% $185.00 $3,330.00 0.74% $300.00 $5,400.00 1.16% $432.00 $7,776.00 1.54% $440.00 $7,920.00 1.47% $650.00 $11,700.00 1.99% $800.00 $14,400.00 2.28% $215.00 $3,870.00 0.60% $200.00 $3,600.00 0.52% $1,251.80 $22,532.40 1.47% $7,776.00 $8,462.95 1.34% Subtotal $79,457.60 $84,018.50 $87,359.00 $92,267.00 $93,930.33 $96,933.50 $111,586.00 $124,768.36 $126,444.75 $105,685.00 $309,930.62 Total $411,888.00 $424,781.10 $448,971.00 $464,338.60 $505,603.74 $539,062.50 $589,388.00 $631,440.55 $639,958.75 $697,457.00 $1,530,734.73 Gentry General Engineering, Inc. DT Stellar General Engineering Van Engineering inc ETHICS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION, INC. L C Paving & Sealing, Inc.

Bid Results Breakdown
Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Program
MSD Project No. 26-003, CIP No. 13064
Bids Opened April 30, 2026 @ 2:00 PM
Carter Enterprises Group Inc. DBA Pavement Rehab Co. Bid Review Sael Construction Corporation Leonida Builders Inc NoLimit Construction S&H Civilworks MARIN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC 278
Bid Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Total Price % of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price
Base Bid - Whitewood Road: Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Los Alamos Road 1 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Base Bid price) LS 1 $21,455.80 $21,455.80 5.21% $18,624.00 $18,624.00 4.38% $7,000.00 2 Traffic Control System LS 1 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 4.13% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $4,000.00 3 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.21% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $3,000.00 4 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.21% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $4,500.00 5 Project Information Sign EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $2,328.00 $2,328.00 0.55% $2,500.00 6 Concrete Removal SF 7979 $5.00 $39,895.00 9.69% $3.85 $30,719.15 7.23% $8.00 7 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 7879 $11.00 $86,669.00 21.04% $7.00 $55,153.00 12.98% $10.00 8 Type A-6 PCC Curb and Gutter, City Std. 301 LF 100 $100.00 $10,000.00 2.43% $51.00 $5,100.00 1.20% $75.00 9 Concrete Sidewalk ADA Grinding, MSD Std. 100 (4' - 6' Sidewalk Width) EA 35 $100.00 $3,500.00 0.85% $134.00 $4,690.00 1.10% $220.00 10 Remove and Dispose of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (6.5" AC Digouts) SF 1834 $3.65 $6,694.10 1.63% $9.50 $17,423.00 4.10% $8.00 11 Asphalt Concrete Pavement for Removal and Replacement of AC (Digouts) TON 82 $200.00 $16,400.00 3.98% $279.00 $22,878.00 5.39% $185.00 12 Install Pavement Striping Detail 39 (Paint) LF 200 $10.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $13.00 $2,600.00 0.61% $18.00 Additive Bid 1 - Whitewood Road: Los Alamos Road to Hunter Road Subtotal $214,613.90 $172,592.15 13 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Additive Bid 1 Price) LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.61% $13,803.00 $13,803.00 3.25% $4,000.00 14 Traffic Control System LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 0.97% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $4,000.00 15 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $2,000.00 16 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $1,000.00 17 Concrete Removal SF 1581 $5.00 $7,905.00 1.92% $3.60 $5,691.60 1.34% $8.00 18 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 1581 $11.00 $17,391.00 4.22% $7.00 $11,067.00 2.61% $10.00 19 Concrete Sidewalk ADA Grinding, MSD Std. 100 (4' - 6' Sidewalk Width) EA 24 $100.00 $2,400.00 0.58% $112.00 $2,688.00 0.63% $220.00 20 Remove and Dispose of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (6.5" AC Digouts) SF 3410 $3.65 $12,446.50 3.02% $11.30 $38,533.00 9.07% $8.00 21 Asphalt Concrete Pavement for Removal and Replacement of AC (Digouts) TON 153 $200.00 $30,600.00 7.43% $251.00 $38,403.00 9.04% $185.00 22 Install Pavement Striping Detail 39 (Paint) LF 313 $10.00 $3,130.00 0.76% $13.00 $4,069.00 0.96% $11.00 Additive Bid 2 - Whitewood Road: Hunter Road to North City Limits Subtotal $82,372.50 $127,331.60 23 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Additive Bid 2 Price) LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $6,089.00 $6,089.00 1.43% $2,500.00 24 Traffic Control System LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $2,500.00 25 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $2,000.00 26 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $1,000.00 27 Concrete Removal SF 1709 $5.00 $8,545.00 2.07% $3.65 $6,237.85 1.47% $8.00 28 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 1709 $11.00 $18,799.00 4.56% $7.00 $11,963.00 2.82% $10.00 29 Concrete Sidewalk ADA Grinding, MSD Std. 100 (4' - 6' Sidewalk Width) EA 31 $100.00 $3,100.00 0.75% $112.00 $3,472.00 0.82% $220.00 Additive Bid 3 - Various Citywide Locations Subtotal $35,444.00 $40,838.85 30 Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total Additive Bid 3 Price) LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $9,946.00 $9,946.00 2.34% $3,000.00 31 Traffic Control System LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.49% $10,160.00 $10,160.00 2.39% $3,000.00 32 Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $1,922.00 $1,922.00 0.45% $2,000.00 33 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 0.24% $995.00 $995.00 0.23% $1,500.00 34 Concrete Removal SF 3179 $5.00 $15,895.00 3.86% $4.50 $14,305.50 3.37% $8.00 35 Concrete Sidewalks, City Std. 320 SF 2992 $11.00 $32,912.00 7.99% $7.00 $20,944.00 4.93% $10.00 36 Type A-6 PCC Curb and Gutter, City Std. 301 LF 187 $100.00 $18,700.00 4.54% $51.00 $9,537.00 2.25% $75.00 37 Remove and Dispose of Asphalt Concrete Pavement (4" AC Digouts) SF 644 $3.65 $2,350.60 0.57% $11.25 $7,245.00 1.71% $8.00 38 Asphalt Concrete Pavement for Removal and Replacement of AC (Digouts) TON 18 $200.00 $3,600.00 0.87% $498.00 $8,964.00 2.11% $185.00 Subtotal $79,457.60 $84,018.50
Total $411,888.00 $424,781.10
Gentry General Engineering, Inc. DT Stellar General Engineering Bid Results Breakdown
Citywide Sidewalk Replacement Program
MSD Project No. 26-003, CIP No. 13064
Bids Opened April 30, 2026 @ 2:00 PM
Carter Enterprises Group Inc. DBA Pavement Rehab Co.
279
Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price
$7,000.00 1.56% $25,000.00 $25,000.00 5.38% $8,387.00 $8,387.00 1.66% $12,000.00 $12,000.00 2.23% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $34,190.42 $4,000.00 0.89% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $33,000.00 $33,000.00 6.12% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $33,000.00 $3,000.00 0.67% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.08% $4,676.00 $4,676.00 0.92% $16,500.00 $16,500.00 3.06% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $4,000.00 $4,500.00 1.00% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.75% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $7,000.00 $7,000.00 1.30% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $12,000.00 $2,500.00 0.56% $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.32% $770.00 $770.00 0.15% $1,325.00 $1,325.00 0.25% $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.25% $2,000.00 $63,832.00 14.22% $3.00 $23,937.00 5.16% $5.61 $44,762.19 8.85% $5.00 $39,895.00 7.40% $5.00 $39,895.00 6.77% $4.00 $78,790.00 17.55% $10.00 $78,790.00 16.97% $10.48 $82,571.92 16.33% $10.50 $82,729.50 15.35% $11.00 $86,669.00 14.70% $12.00 $7,500.00 1.67% $20.00 $2,000.00 0.43% $80.94 $8,094.00 1.60% $58.00 $5,800.00 1.08% $140.00 $14,000.00 2.38% $60.00 $7,700.00 1.72% $500.00 $17,500.00 3.77% $239.00 $8,365.00 1.65% $330.00 $11,550.00 2.14% $500.00 $17,500.00 2.97% $120.00 $14,672.00 3.27% $2.50 $4,585.00 0.99% $7.80 $14,305.20 2.83% $5.25 $9,628.50 1.79% $12.00 $22,008.00 3.73% $6.00 $15,170.00 3.38% $250.00 $20,500.00 4.41% $432.00 $35,424.00 7.01% $200.00 $16,400.00 3.04% $520.00 $42,640.00 7.23% $404.00 $3,600.00 0.80% $2.20 $440.00 0.09% $14.00 $2,800.00 0.55% $34.00 $6,800.00 1.26% $30.00 $6,000.00 1.02% $20.00 $212,264.00 $192,752.00 $214,906.31 $242,628.00 $240,212.00 $4,000.00 0.89% $15,000.00 $15,000.00 3.23% $7,379.00 $7,379.00 1.46% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.86% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $22,714.03 $4,000.00 0.89% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $16,500.00 $16,500.00 3.06% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $27,000.00 $2,000.00 0.45% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $4,675.00 $4,675.00 0.92% $9,750.00 $9,750.00 1.81% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $1,000.00 0.22% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.65% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $10,000.00 $12,648.00 2.82% $5.00 $7,905.00 1.70% $5.61 $8,869.41 1.75% $5.25 $8,300.25 1.54% $6.00 $9,486.00 1.61% $4.00 $15,810.00 3.52% $10.00 $15,810.00 3.40% $10.48 $16,568.88 3.28% $9.50 $15,019.50 2.79% $12.00 $18,972.00 3.22% $12.00 $5,280.00 1.18% $400.00 $9,600.00 2.07% $239.00 $5,736.00 1.13% $330.00 $7,920.00 1.47% $500.00 $12,000.00 2.04% $120.00 $27,280.00 6.08% $4.00 $13,640.00 2.94% $7.80 $26,598.00 5.26% $5.25 $17,902.50 3.32% $12.00 $40,920.00 6.94% $6.00 $28,305.00 6.30% $250.00 $38,250.00 8.24% $432.00 $66,096.00 13.07% $200.00 $30,600.00 5.68% $520.00 $79,560.00 13.50% $404.00 $3,443.00 0.77% $2.20 $688.60 0.15% $14.00 $4,382.00 0.87% $17.00 $5,321.00 0.99% $30.00 $9,390.00 1.59% $13.42 $103,766.00 $115,893.60 $145,055.29 $124,813.25 $180,328.00 $2,500.00 0.56% $8,000.00 $8,000.00 1.72% $7,379.00 $7,379.00 1.46% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.86% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $7,259.28 $2,500.00 0.56% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $16,000.00 $16,000.00 2.97% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $12,000.00 $2,000.00 0.45% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.75% $4,675.00 $4,675.00 0.92% $9,750.00 $9,750.00 1.81% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $3,000.00 $1,000.00 0.22% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.65% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $4,000.00 $13,672.00 3.05% $4.00 $6,836.00 1.47% $5.61 $9,587.49 1.90% $5.25 $8,972.25 1.66% $6.00 $10,254.00 1.74% $4.00 $17,090.00 3.81% $10.00 $17,090.00 3.68% $10.48 $17,910.32 3.54% $9.50 $16,235.50 3.01% $12.00 $20,508.00 3.48% $12.00 $6,820.00 1.52% $500.00 $15,500.00 3.34% $239.00 $7,409.00 1.47% $330.00 $10,230.00 1.90% $500.00 $15,500.00 2.63% $120.00 $45,582.00 $63,426.00 $51,711.81 $74,687.75 $57,262.00
$3,000.00 0.67% $12,000.00 $12,000.00 2.58% $7,379.00 $7,379.00 1.46% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.86% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $15,800.36 $3,000.00 0.67% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 2.15% $2,963.00 $2,963.00 0.59% $11,400.00 $11,400.00 2.11% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $18,000.00 $2,000.00 0.45% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 1.08% $4,675.00 $4,675.00 0.92% $9,750.00 $9,750.00 1.81% $3,000.00 $3,000.00 0.51% $3,000.00 $1,500.00 0.33% $2,500.00 $2,500.00 0.54% $1,788.00 $1,788.00 0.35% $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.65% $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.34% $6,000.00 $25,432.00 5.66% $4.00 $12,716.00 2.74% $5.61 $17,834.19 3.53% $3.50 $11,126.50 2.06% $6.00 $19,074.00 3.24% $4.00 $29,920.00 6.66% $10.00 $29,920.00 6.44% $10.48 $31,356.16 6.20% $9.50 $28,424.00 5.27% $12.00 $35,904.00 6.09% $12.00 $14,025.00 3.12% $65.00 $12,155.00 2.62% $80.94 $15,135.78 2.99% $31.00 $5,797.00 1.08% $140.00 $26,180.00 4.44% $60.00 $5,152.00 1.15% $4.00 $2,576.00 0.55% $7.80 $5,023.20 0.99% $14.00 $9,016.00 1.67% $12.00 $7,728.00 1.31% $12.00 $3,330.00 0.74% $300.00 $5,400.00 1.16% $432.00 $7,776.00 1.54% $440.00 $7,920.00 1.47% $650.00 $11,700.00 1.99% $800.00 $87,359.00 $92,267.00 $93,930.33 $96,933.50 $111,586.00 $448,971.00 $464,338.60 $505,603.74 $539,062.50 $589,388.00 DT Stellar General Engineering Van Engineering inc ETHICS LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION, INC. L C Paving & Sealing, Inc. Sael Construction Corporation Leonida Builders Inc 280
Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price Unit Price Total Price
% of Total
Bid Price
Median Total
Price
Average Total
Price
Average % of
Total Bid Price
$34,190.42 5.41% $32,000.00 $32,000.00 5.00% $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2.15% $94,392.00 $94,392.00 6.17% $18,624.00 $24,640.84 3.61% $33,000.00 5.23% $25,000.00 $25,000.00 3.91% $20,000.00 $20,000.00 2.87% $26,130.00 $26,130.00 1.71% $17,000.00 $16,750.27 2.77% $4,000.00 0.63% $6,500.00 $6,500.00 1.02% $15,000.00 $15,000.00 2.15% $23,180.00 $23,180.00 1.51% $5,000.00 $7,888.91 1.19% $12,000.00 1.90% $5,500.00 $5,500.00 0.86% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $19,205.00 $19,205.00 1.25% $5,000.00 $6,044.36 0.90% $2,000.00 0.32% $1,200.00 $1,200.00 0.19% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $3,637.00 $3,637.00 0.24% $1,500.00 $2,069.09 0.34% $31,916.00 5.05% $7.45 $59,443.55 9.29% $3.00 $23,937.00 3.43% $21.97 $175,298.63 11.45% $39,895.00 $52,139.14 8.05% $94,548.00 14.97% $17.75 $139,852.25 21.85% $10.00 $78,790.00 11.30% $29.44 $231,957.76 15.15% $82,729.50 $99,683.68 16.20% $6,000.00 0.95% $98.00 $9,800.00 1.53% $150.00 $15,000.00 2.15% $128.48 $12,848.00 0.84% $8,094.00 $8,740.18 1.48% $4,200.00 0.67% $255.00 $8,925.00 1.39% $5,500.00 $192,500.00 27.60% $215.77 $7,551.95 0.49% $8,365.00 $25,816.54 4.03% $11,004.00 1.74% $7.05 $12,929.70 2.02% $5.00 $9,170.00 1.31% $24.66 $45,226.44 2.95% $12,929.70 $15,240.54 2.40% $33,128.00 5.25% $215.00 $17,630.00 2.75% $150.00 $12,300.00 1.76% $876.70 $71,889.40 4.70% $20,500.00 $27,669.04 4.45% $4,000.00 0.63% $5.00 $1,000.00 0.16% $20.00 $4,000.00 0.57% $17.52 $3,504.00 0.23% $3,504.00 $3,340.36 0.58% $269,986.42 $319,780.50 $395,697.00 $714,820.18
$22,714.03 3.60% $6,000.00 $6,000.00 0.94% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $47,536.00 $47,536.00 3.11% $7,379.00 $12,448.37 1.83% $27,000.00 4.28% $11,000.00 $11,000.00 1.72% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.43% $12,701.00 $12,701.00 0.83% $10,000.00 $10,120.36 1.71% $5,000.00 0.79% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $11,222.00 $11,222.00 0.73% $2,500.00 $4,297.18 0.67% $10,000.00 1.58% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $9,316.00 $9,316.00 0.61% $2,200.00 $3,572.64 0.53% $6,324.00 1.00% $7.45 $11,778.45 1.84% $5.00 $7,905.00 1.13% $24.31 $38,434.11 2.51% $8,300.25 $11,386.07 1.74% $18,972.00 3.00% $17.75 $28,062.75 4.39% $10.00 $15,810.00 2.27% $32.58 $51,508.98 3.36% $16,568.88 $20,453.83 3.28% $2,880.00 0.46% $255.00 $6,120.00 0.96% $750.00 $18,000.00 2.58% $238.78 $5,730.72 0.37% $5,736.00 $7,123.16 1.22% $20,460.00 3.24% $7.05 $24,040.50 3.76% $5.00 $17,050.00 2.44% $27.29 $93,058.90 6.08% $24,040.50 $30,175.40 4.74% $61,812.00 9.79% $215.00 $32,895.00 5.14% $200.00 $30,600.00 4.39% $647.90 $99,128.70 6.48% $38,250.00 $48,749.97 8.10% $4,200.46 0.67% $5.00 $1,565.00 0.24% $25.00 $7,825.00 1.12% $17.41 $5,449.33 0.36% $4,200.46 $4,496.67 0.77% $179,362.49 $125,861.70 $122,190.00 $374,085.74
$7,259.28 1.15% $6,500.00 $6,500.00 1.02% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $15,415.00 $15,415.00 1.01% $6,500.00 $6,649.30 1.08% $12,000.00 1.90% $6,000.00 $6,000.00 0.94% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.43% $4,530.00 $4,530.00 0.30% $6,000.00 $7,104.82 1.27% $3,000.00 0.48% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $4,003.00 $4,003.00 0.26% $3,000.00 $3,640.91 0.63% $4,000.00 0.63% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $3,323.00 $3,323.00 0.22% $2,200.00 $2,482.36 0.41% $6,836.00 1.08% $7.45 $12,732.05 1.99% $5.00 $8,545.00 1.23% $24.31 $41,545.79 2.71% $8,972.25 $12,160.31 1.85% $20,508.00 3.25% $17.75 $30,334.75 4.74% $10.00 $17,090.00 2.45% $32.58 $55,679.22 3.64% $17,910.32 $22,109.80 3.54% $3,720.00 0.59% $255.00 $7,905.00 1.24% $750.00 $23,250.00 3.33% $238.78 $7,402.18 0.48% $7,409.00 $9,482.56 1.64% $57,323.28 $67,871.80 $73,885.00 $131,898.19
$15,800.36 2.50% $10,500.00 $10,500.00 1.64% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $36,222.00 $36,222.00 2.37% $9,946.00 $10,440.67 1.56% $18,000.00 2.85% $8,500.00 $8,500.00 1.33% $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1.43% $10,645.00 $10,645.00 0.70% $10,000.00 $8,151.64 1.38% $3,000.00 0.48% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $9,406.00 $9,406.00 0.61% $3,000.00 $4,268.45 0.69% $6,000.00 0.95% $2,200.00 $2,200.00 0.34% $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.72% $7,808.00 $7,808.00 0.51% $2,200.00 $3,117.36 0.47% $12,716.00 2.01% $7.45 $23,683.55 3.70% $5.00 $15,895.00 2.28% $24.31 $77,281.49 5.05% $15,895.00 $22,359.93 3.41% $35,904.00 5.69% $17.75 $53,108.00 8.30% $10.00 $29,920.00 4.29% $32.58 $97,479.36 6.37% $31,356.16 $38,708.32 6.20% $11,220.00 1.78% $98.00 $18,326.00 2.86% $150.00 $28,050.00 4.02% $142.19 $26,589.53 1.74% $15,135.78 $16,883.21 2.86% $7,728.00 1.22% $6.30 $4,057.20 0.63% $5.00 $3,220.00 0.46% $34.11 $21,966.84 1.44% $5,152.00 $6,914.80 1.06% $14,400.00 2.28% $215.00 $3,870.00 0.60% $200.00 $3,600.00 0.52% $1,251.80 $22,532.40 1.47% $7,776.00 $8,462.95 1.34% $124,768.36 $126,444.75 $105,685.00 $309,930.62
$631,440.55 $639,958.75 $697,457.00 $1,530,734.73
Bid ReviewLeonida Builders Inc NoLimit Construction S&H Civilworks MARIN CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC 281
District 1
District 2
District 5
District 4
Project Boundary:

Whitewood Road

M U R R I E T A H O T S P R I N G S
R
D

C L I N
T O
N

K E I T H R D
L
O
S
A
L
A
M
O
S
R
D
V

I A Z A P A
T
A

DEVON ST

S A G E G L E
N
S
T
J
U
N
I P
E
R
S
T

SOCORRO ST

KARA ST

BREDA AVE

T R I P L E C R A N C H R D

RAVENNA ST

G A T I N E A U S T
L
A
A

L B A D R
H
Y
D
R
U
S
P
L
C
A
L
L
E
Q
U
E
D
O
M
A
R
G
A
R
I
T
A
R
D
P
E
T
U
N
I
A
S
T
J
A
C
K
S
O
N
A
V
E

S A L V
I
A
L
N
H
I
G
H
B
U
R
Y
D
R

SANDY AVE
B

U S M A N R D
T
R E E
R
O
S
E
A
V
E

YORKTON RD
K
U
C
E
R
A
C
T
M
I
T
C
H
E
L
L
R
D
F
A
L
K
IR
K
D
R

A N D R O M E D A S T
M
A

R Y P L

CALLE ANDRAS
C
A
R
N

A T I O
N
A
V
E
O
R
C
H
I
D
T
R
E
E
A
V
E

V I A E S P A D A
J
A
Y
L
E

N E S T
P
A
R
K
C
R

E S T D R
Q
U
I N
T
A
N
I
A
D
R
C
A
R
L T O
N
O
A
K
S
S
T

HAZEL GLEN RD

SPUR DR

W R A N G L E R D R
V I A
M
O
N
S
E
R
A
T
E

P E B B L E B E A C H D R
G
A
L
I
L
E
O
L
N
W
I
L
L
O
W
B
E
N
D
D
R
B
L
A
C
K
T
H
O
R
N
E
D
R
S
H
A
D
Y
M
A
P
L
E
R
D
G
O
L
D
E
N
E
A
G

L E A V E
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
A
C
A
C
I
A
S
C
A
L
L
E
S
A
N
V

I C E N T E

WARE ST
A
S
C
E
L
L
A
L
N

C H I T T A
M
W
O
O
D
P
L
V
E
R
B
E
N
A
A V
E
V I A
T
A
F
F
I A
C
O
U
N
T
R
Y
M
I
L
L
R
D
B
I
R
C
H
T
R
E
E
D
R
V
I A

P R I N C E S A

PAMPLONA AVE
V I A
L
A
P
A
L
O
M
A

M A P L E T
O
N
A
V
E
O
A

K M O N T C T

TOULON DR
C
R
E
S
T
A
D
E
L
R
E
Y
O

C L E A R V I E W S T
D
A
P
H
N
E
D
R
A
Z
A
L
E
A
L
N
P
U
M

P K I N S T
V
I
A
T
E
M
P
R
A
N
O

C L E A R B
R
O
O
K
D
R
P
O
I N

S E T T I A
S
T
L
A
L
U
N
E
A
V
E
L
A
V
A
T
E
R
A
S
T
T
U
C
A

N A P L
V
I
A
A
Z
U
L
I
R
I
S
L
N

KELLER RD
S U
M
A
C
A
V
E
R

O B E R T T R E N T J O N E S
P
K
Y
G
L
O
R
I
O
S
A
P
L
C
O
P
P
E
R
L E
A
F
C
T
K
I
N
G
S
N
A
K
E
A
V
E
C
A
L
L
E
Y
O
R
B
A
V
I S
T
A
E
M
I L Y
P
L
P
I
C
T
O
R
A
V
E
T
A

L I T H A W A Y
M
E
M
B
E
R
S
C
L
U
B
D
R
V
I
A
E
S
C
A
R L A
T
A
R
A
N
C
H
H O
U S E
S T

TONYA LN

VERANDA WAY
N
E
W
H
A
V
E
N
D
R

H U B B L E W A Y
V I S
T
A
M
U
R
R
I
E
T
A
R
D
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
M
I
G
U
E
L
O
E
S
T
E
M
U R R
I E
T
A
O
A K
S
A
V
E
V
I
A
E
S
P
A
N
A

L Y N N C T
O
A
K
M
E
A
D
O
W
S
P L
R
A
N
C
H
W
O
O
D
D
R
H

A C K B E R R Y S T
A
V
E
N
I
D
A
S
O
M
B R A
E
A
R
L
Y
L
N
M
A
N
G
R
O
V
E
S
T
G
E
M
I
N
A
A
V
E

B I G D I P P E R
W
A
Y
V
A
N
D

E R B I L T A V E
P A P
E
R
B
A
R
K
A
V
E
R
A

M S H O
R
N
D
R
S
E
R
E
N
E
T
Y
L
N
A
S
H
W
O
O
D
L
N
T
H
I
S
T
L
E
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
C
O
U
P
L
E
S
A
V
E
S
P A
R
K
M
A
N
D
R

M O R N
I N
G
S
T
A
R
D
R

L I N N E L L N
M
C
E
L
W
A
I N
R
D
R
O
C
K
C
R
E
S
T
D
R
C
I R

C I N U S S T

R O S S I T E R R D
C
R
A
B
A

P P L E
S
T

V I A M A D
R
I
D
H
A
N
C
O
C
K
A
V
E
W
I L
D
F
L
O
W
E
R
D
R
C
A
L
L
E
S
A
N
C
L
E

M E N T E

V I A P L A
Y
A
D
E
L
R
E
Y
A
U
G
U
S
T
A
D
R
T
H
Y
M
E
L
N
L
A
S

B R I S A S
R
D
V
I
A
C
A
D
I Z
V
I A
L
A
C
O
L
I
N
A
P
O
P
P
Y
L
N

A Z A R A S T

SCOTT RD
G

R E E R
R
D

DAMSEL ST
V

I A M I R A M O S A

S K I R A
N
C
H
S
T

WALT RD
N
A
N
D
I
N
A
L
N
M
A
R
I
G
O
L
D
L
N

V I R I D I A N
S T

SIERRA LN
M

A P L E T O N S T

C A L L E D E
L
B
U
H
O
A
L
T
A
M
U
R
R
I E
T
A
D
R

HUNTER RD
M
A
S
T
E
R
S
D
R
C
A
M
I N
O
A
L B A

B O T T L E B
R
U
S
H
W
A
Y
V
I A
D E L
S
O
L

LIBERTY RD
B
U
C
K
W
O
O
D
W
A
Y
S
H
A
M
R
O
C
K
L
N

C R O S B Y S T

SHEA LN
B
O
X
E

L D E R
D
R

G A N D O L F C T

BRUNING ST

BAXTER RD
S
H
A
D
E
S
C
A
L
E
D
R
A
V
E
N
I D
A
P
A
L
I
Z
A
D
A
M
E
A
D
O
W
L
A
R
K
L
N

GREENBERG PL

WILLIE LN

CATT RD
V
I
N
C
A
L
N

VIA DEL LARGO

B R A N W I N S T

LEAFWOOD DR
S

T A R F A L L
W
A Y

SPYGLASS CIR
V
IA
D
O
M
I
N
I
Q
U
E
V
I A
P
E
R
A
I-215

S H A D Y L N
V
I
A
C
A
R
E
Z
A

T R E F
O

I L S T

MENIFEE RD
C
A

L L E A
L
T
A

N E W C A
S
T
L
E
R
D
O
L
D
S
P
R
I
N
G
R
D

ARIEL ST
C
A
T
A
L
I N
A
S
T
R
U
T
H
E
L
L
E
N
W
A
Y

B A K E R L N
E
T
I E
N
N
E C
I R

JOAN DUNN LN
H
A
C
H
T E N
R
D
I-15

ARENDT LN
C
E
D
A
R
W
O
O
D
D
R
V

I A L A S
J
U
N
IT
A
S
V
I
A
M
O
N
T
A
L
V
O

ALTA LOMA LN
S
N
O
W
G
U
M
L
N
S
K
Y
P
A
R
K
R
D
B
E
N
T
T

R E E D R
V
I
A
C
A
S
T
A
N
A
V
I
A
L
A
S
L
O
M A S
M A D
R
O
N
E
D
R
P
O
S
T
O
A
K
P
L
D
E
R

B Y D R
V
I A
G
A
L
L
E
T
A
S
C
A
L
L
E
A
Z
U
C
A
R
C
O
R
T
E
G
A
T
A
A
S
T

M A S O
N
A V E

CAPE AIRE WAY
M
A X M
I L
L
I A
N
A
V
E

EPPLE ST

LACEBARK DR
LEE LN
P
A
B
E
S
U
R
D
D
O
N
A
L
D
R
D
S
O
U
T
H
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
B
R
IG
G
S
R
D
L A Z
Y
H
A
W
K
A
V
E

STEPP RD
W
A
L
S
H
C
E
N
T

E R D R

BRIANS WY
P I N
Y
O
N
S
T
B
R
O
N
C
O
W
A
Y
D
U
S
T
E
R
R
D

PORTH RD
C
E
L
I A
R D
C
R A
W
F
O

R D C A N Y
O
N
R
D

SOMERS RD

TWIN WILLOW RD
W
I
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
R
D
A
N
T
E
L
O
P
E
R
D
0 0.5 10.25
Miles
282

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 7.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Brian Crawford, Municipal Services Director
PREPARED BY: Garrett Strang, Capital Projects Program Manager SUBJECT:

Award a Construction Contract for the Fire Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project, CIP No. 21037, MSD Project No. 26-001

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this item is to award a construction contract for the Fire Station 1 Living Quarters Improvements Project to the lowest responsible bidder, find the project to be exempt from CEQA, and amend the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) budget to appropriate additional funding necessary to fully fund CIP No. 21037.

RECOMMENDATION
Amend the Capital Improvement Plan Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26 and establish an appropriation of $1,174,719.74 using Measure T Fund Unassigned Fund Balance into CIP No. 21037; Find the Fire Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project, CIP No. 21037, MSD Project No. 26-001, to be exempt from CEQA and award the construction contract to DeArk E&C, Inc. in the amount of $1,450,000; Authorize a 15% construction contingency of $217,500;
Authorize the Director of Municipal Services, and/or his designee, to approve contract change orders not to exceed 15% of the contract amount; and
Authorize the Mayor to execute the construction contract.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On June 3, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. 25-4836, approving the Capital Improvement Plan Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26, and the Fiscal Year 2025/26 to 2029/30 Capital Improvement Plan, which included the Fire Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project, CIP No. 21037 (Vote: 5-0).

On July 1, 2025, the City Council approved a purchase order with TR Design Group, Inc., in the amount of $174,129, plus a 15% contingency, for a total amount of $200,248 to perform architectural and consultant services related to the remodel of Fire Station 1 under the terms of their existing on-call Professional Services CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
283
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 7.

Agreement with the City (Vote: 4-0-1).

On March 17, 2026, the City Council awarded the construction contract for the Temporary Modular Living Quarters Fire Station 1 in association with CIP No. 21037 to CSLM Construction Inc. in the amount of $217,822.74, and authorized the City Manager to execute the contract on behalf of the City (Vote: 5-0).

On May 5, 2026, the City Council approved a Purchase Order for Construction Management Services for the Fire Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project, CIP No. 21037, to Griffin Structures in the amount of $247,160 under the terms of their existing on-call General Services Agreement with the City (Vote: 5-0).

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
This item aligns with the City Council goal of: providing a high level of innovative public safety relating to priority Tier 1. This project includes a full remodel of the existing living quarters at Fire Station 1.

DISCUSSION
The Murrieta Fire and Rescue Station 1 Living Quarters is a 38-year-old facility that is due for renovations to address aging infrastructure and deferred maintenance affecting both the interior and exterior of the building, as well as to provide quarters for female staff that could be assigned to the station in the future. The existing amenities and layout no longer fully support the size of modern apparatus or current staffing needs, making a comprehensive overhaul of the living quarters imperative to the Fire Department’soperations. The proposed remodel will address critical needs, including spatial constraints, modernize living accommodations, update the facility’s outdated mechanical, electrical, and plumbing equipment, modernize the living quarters (bedrooms, common areas, patio, office spaces, kitchen, restrooms, showers, etc.), address safety concerns, ADA Improvements, accessibility, and address the current and future needs of the Fire Department.

During construction, on-duty firefighters will be relocated to temporary modular living quarters on site at Fire Station 1. Normal operations of the Fire Station will remain unchanged, and emergency response capabilities will not be impacted.

PROJECT BIDDING AND DETERMINATION
The City of Murrieta (City) advertised the project on March 26, 2026, and received a total of 13 construction bids on April 28, 2026. The basis for determining the low bidder was defined in the specifications as the sum of the Base Bid. The bid results are as follows:

Bidder Total Base Bid

1. DeArk E&C, INC $1,450,000.00

2. Tovey/Shultz Construction, Inc. $1,670,026.73

3. R.C. Construction Services $1,670,537.00

4. SWCS Inc $1,874,737.00

5. Blackstone Builders Inc. $1,976,899.00

6. Coelho Inc $1,998,360.00

7. R. Dependable Construction Inc. $2,185,000.00

8. Caliba Inc. $2,251,443.40

9. M. Brey, Inc $2,376,050.07
10 MLC Constructors, Inc. $2,464,817.00
11 AA Modern General Contractors Inc. $2,487,000.00

12. First Trade $2,575,000.00

13. Leonida Builders Inc $2,733,000.00
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
284
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 7.

Bidder Total Base Bid

1. DeArk E&C, INC $1,450,000.00

2. Tovey/Shultz Construction, Inc. $1,670,026.73

3. R.C. Construction Services $1,670,537.00

4. SWCS Inc $1,874,737.00

5. Blackstone Builders Inc. $1,976,899.00

6. Coelho Inc $1,998,360.00

7. R. Dependable Construction Inc. $2,185,000.00

8. Caliba Inc. $2,251,443.40

9. M. Brey, Inc $2,376,050.07
10 MLC Constructors, Inc. $2,464,817.00
11 AA Modern General Contractors Inc. $2,487,000.00

12. First Trade $2,575,000.00

13. Leonida Builders Inc $2,733,000.00
The City received a formal bid protest from the number two (2) bidder, Tovey/Shultz Construction, Inc. (Tovey/Shultz), protesting the bid submitted by the apparent low bidder, DeArk E&C, Inc. (DeArk). Staff, including the City Attorney’sOffice, reviewed the bid protest and determined that the noted deficiencies in DeArk’sbid proposal were either informalities, immaterial to the outcome of the bid, or were otherwise deemed not to be valid and did not provide DeArk with a competitive advantage in the bidding process. Therefore, DeArk is not subject to disqualification from being awarded the construction contract. A formal response was provided to Tovey/Shultz outlining the City’s position on the bid protest.

Staff reviewed the bids and determined that the item prices are consistent with today’sconstruction market.

Staff recommends that the construction contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, DeArk E&C, Inc., in the amount of $1,450,000 for the total Base Bid, plus a 15% construction contingency of $217,500, for a total of $1,667,500.

PUBLIC NOTICING
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

CEQA AND REGULATORY OVERVIEW
Staff recommends exemption of this project from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15302 (Class 2 Categorical Exemption) of the CEQA Guidelines because this project involves “replacementor reconstruction”of existing infrastructure or facilities and is on the same site serving the same purpose and capacity as the facility being replaced without expanded use.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact for approval of the construction contract is $1,450,000, plus an additional 15% contingency amount of $217,500, for a total not to exceed amount of $1,667,500. The total estimated project costs, including associated soft costs such as design, inspection, permits, purchase of temporary modular living quarters, construction management, and other administrative costs for the Fire Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project, are $2,674,719.74. Funding will be available in CIP No. 21037 upon approval of the requested amendments to the Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan Budget for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

As part of the prior-year Capital Improvement Plan budget development, City Council approved $1,500,000, in funding for this project (CIP No. 21037). Based on total project cost estimates, staff recommends an additional appropriation of $1,174,719.74 from the Measure T Unassigned Fund Balance into CIP No. 21037, bringing the total project budget to $2,674,719.74, to fully fund the Fire Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project, including contingency. CIP No. 21037 is funded by Measure T (Fund 111).

ATTACHMENTS
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
285
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 7.

ATT 1 - Contract between the City of Murrieta and DeArk E&C, Inc.

ATT 2 - Proposal from DeArk E&C, Inc.

ATT 3 - Bid Results Summary
ATT 4 - Vicinity Map
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 1

INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM

DEARK E&C INC,
EFFECTIVE | REVISION DATE: 01/01/2025
IIPP
347
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 2

INJURY AND ILLNESS PREVENTION PROGRAM (IIPP)
Purpose
The purpose of the IIPP (Injury and Illness Prevention Program) is to ensure employee safety and health while achieving compliance with California Department of Industrial Relations | Title 8 (T8), of the Californ ia Code of Regulations (CCR), Section 3203.

Scope
This IIPP applies to all employees working in The State of California and to all operations performed in The State of Califor nia.

Policy Statement
The personal safety and health of each [DEARK E&C INC.] employee is paramount. Prevention of occupationally induced injuries and illnesses is of such consequence that it will be given precedence over operating productivity, whenever necessar y.

To the greatest degree possible, management will provide all mechanical and physical activities required for personal safety and health, in keeping with the highest standards.

Responsibilities
[SEAN LEE] is the [DEARK E&C INC.] Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP) administrator, who has the authority, responsibility and overall accountability for the comprehensive implementation of this IIPP.

Ma
nagers and Supervisors shall implement and maintain the IIPP in the work area and answer all employee inquiries about the IIPP. Each manager and supervisor will have a copy of this IIPP, and will ensure that each employee has a copy of this IIPP.

Safety Communication
Open, two–way communication between management and employees concerning health and safety is required in order to have a workplace that is both productive and free from hazards .

Th
e system of communication as outlined below will facilitate an uninterrupted flow of health and safety information between management and employees in a manner that is easy to understand.

The
communication system should be comprised of the following elements:
• New
hire orientation will provide new employees with the proper information about safety and health policies and procedures,
• IIPPs, workplace safety and health training programs will be regularly reviewed with the staff, • Safety meetings will occur on a regularly scheduled basis, • Employees and supervisors will effectively communicate safety and health concerns, • Safety information will be posted in visible areas and/or distributed, • A system must be implemented so that employees can report safety and health problems or hazards effectively and anonymously without fear reprisal or reprimand,
Wh
en required, a labor and management safety committee will meet on a regular basis:
• A wr
itten record of the health and safety committee meetings will be composed and r etained, • The committee will review results of scheduled periodic inspections, investigation reports of accidents and exposures, and alleged hazardous conditions,
• The committee will make recommendations to prevent future accidents and exposures, in additio n to recommending ways to implement employee's safety suggestions.

Per
iodic inspections to assess identified workplace hazards will be performed by competent observers in the following workplace areas:
• Th
e Project Manager or Safety Representative shall serve as inspector, and provide daily safety review of the project sites.
• A Safety Group or Committee will be responsible for performing safety evaluations of the project sites on an as 348
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 3
needed basis.

Periodic inspections involve the identification and assessment of workplace hazards. Applicable documentation must be used, along with other methods that have been deemed effective in the identification and evaluation of workplace hazards.

P
eriodic inspections are to be conducted according to the following:
• A
ny time that potentially hazardous substances, procedures or equipment is introduced into the workplace, • When previously unidentified hazards are recognized,
• Whenever a work-related injury or illness occurs,
• When employees (both temporary and permanent) are hired or reassigned to processes, operations or tasks that have yet to undergo a hazard evaluation,
• Any time the company feels that workplace conditions warrant an inspection.

Employee Compliance
• M
anagement holds the responsibility of ensuring that all safety and health related policies and procedures have bee n c
ommunicated to all employees and that the employees understand all information provided to them. • Both managers and supervisors will enforce all rules fairly and uniformly. • Employees will comply with the IIPP by taking advantage of all applicable incentives, training and retraining.

T
he systems used to ensure all employees comply with rules to maintain a safe work environment include:
• P
roviding employees with the provisions of the IIPP,
• Making sure that the safety of each employee's work is properly evaluated, • Recognizing those employees who engage in safe and healthful work practices, • Training employees who fail to adhere to safety performance guidelines, • Taking disciplinary action against employees who fail to comply with the safety guidelines.

Code of Safe Practices
The following “Code of Safe Practices” shall be observed and complied with by “all” employees, supervisors and managers:

1. All persons shall follow these safe practice rules, render every possible aid to safe operations, and report all unsa fe c
onditions or practices to the foreman or superintendent.

2. Foremen shall insist on employees observing and obeying every rule, regulation, and order as is necessary to the safe conduct of the work, and shall take such action as is necessary to obtain observance.

3. All employees shall be given frequent accident prevention instructions. Instructions shall be given at least every 10 w
orking days.

4. Anyone known to be under the influence of drugs or intoxicating substances that impair the employee's ability to safely perform the assigned duties shall not be allowed on the job while in that condition.

5. Horseplay, scuffling, and other acts that tend to have an adverse influence on the safety or well -being of the e
mployees shall be prohibited.

6. Work shall be well planned and supervised to prevent injuries in the handling of materials and in working together with equipment.

7. No one shall knowingly be permitted or required to work while the employee's ability or alertness is so impaire d by
f
atigue, illness, or other causes that it might unnecessarily expose the emplo yee or others to injury.

8. Employees shall not enter manholes, underground vaults, chambers, tanks, silos, or other similar places that receive little ventilation, unless it has been determined that is safe to enter.

9. Employees shall be instructed to ensure that all guards and other protective devices are in proper places a nd
a
djusted, and shall report deficiencies promptly to the foreman or superintendent.

10. Crowding or pushing when boarding or leaving any vehicle or other conveyance shall be prohibited.

11. Workers shall not handle or tamper with any electrical equipment, machinery, or air or water lines in a manner not within the scope of their duties, unless they have received instructions from their foreman.

12. All injuries shall be reported promptly to the foreman or superintendent so that arrangements can be made for medical or first aid treatment.

13. When lifting heavy objects, the large muscles of the leg instead of the smaller muscles of the back shall be used. 349
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 4

14. Inappropriate footwear or shoes with thin or badly worn soles shall not be worn.

15. Materials, tools, or other objects shall not be thrown from buildings or structures until proper precautions are take n t
o protect others from the falling objects.

16. Employees shall cleanse thoroughly after handling hazardous su bstances, and follow special instructions fro
m authorized sources.

17. H
od carriers should avoid the use of extension ladders when carrying loads. Such ladders may provide adequate strength, but the rung position and rope arrangement make such climbing difficult and hazardous for t
his trade.

18. Work shall be so arranged that employees are able to face ladder and use both hands while climbing.

19. Ga
soline shall not be used for cleaning purposes.

20. N
o burning, welding, or other source of ignition shall be applied to any enclosed tank or vessel, even if there are some openings, until it has first been determined that no possibility of explosion exists, and authority for the work is obtained from the foreman or superintendent.

21. A
ny damage to scaffolds, falsework, or other supporting structures shall be immediately reported to the fo
reman and repaired before use.

22. A
ll tools and equipment shall be maintained in good condition.

23. Damaged tools or equipment shall be removed from service and tagged "DEFECTIVE."

24. Pipe or Stillson wrenches shall not be used as a substitute for other wrenches.

25. Only appropriate tools shall be used for the job.

26. Wrenches shall not be altered by the addition of handle-extensions or "cheaters."

27. F
iles shall be equipped with handles and not used to punch or pry.

28. A
screwdriver shall not be used as a chisel.

29. Wheelbarrows shall not be pushed with handles in an upright position.

30. Portable electric tools shall not be lifted or lowered by means of the power cord. Ropes shall be used.

31. E
lectric cords shall not be exposed to damage from vehicles.

32. I
n locations where the use of a portable power tool is difficult, the tool shall be supported by means of a r
ope or similar support of adequate strength.

33. O
nly authorized persons shall operate machinery or equipment.

34. Loose or frayed clothing, or long hair, dangling ties, finger rings, etc., shall not be worn around moving machinery or other sources of entanglement.

35. Machinery shall not be serviced, repaired or adjusted while in operation, nor shall oiling of moving parts be attempted, except on equipment that is designed or fitted with safeguards to protect the person performing the work.

36. A
ll subcontractors (if applicable) shall adhere to these safe practices and their own during their course of work.

37. A
ll employees shall be trained at least annually on the hazards associated with their course of work.

38. E
ach employee reserves the right to refuse to work if a hazard is present and shall notify their supervisor of the hazard immediately.

39. E
ach employee reserves the right to bypass supervisors if they are ordered to work when a hazard is present by calling the next supervisory individual in their chain of command.

40. E
ach employee is responsible for reporting unsafe practices by other workers to their supervisor.

Inspections, Hazard Assessment, Control & Correction
Site-specific inspections for each non high-hazard location where employees are present shall be conducted and recorded at least monthly. Site’s, which are considered high-hazard, shall be inspected either on a weekly or daily basis (determined by safety administrator) generating inspection records with each inspection. Based upon the severity of the hazard, unsafe or unhealthy work conditions will be corrected in a timely fashion according to the following procedures:
• W
hen an imminent hazard exists that cannot be abolished immediately without posing risk to employees and/or property occurs, employees are to be removed from the area. Only those employees who are needed to correct th e c
ondition are exempt,
• Those employees needed to correct the hazardous condition will be provided with the required protectio n e
quipment,
350
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 5
• All actions and dated of completion will be documented on the designated forms.

Incident (Accident) Investigation
The following procedures will be implemented to investigate workplace acciden ts and possible substance exposures:
• T
he accident scene must be visited as soon as possible,
• Injured workers and witnesses will be interviewed,
• The cause of the accident and/or exposure will be determined, • Corrective actions will be taken to prevent recurrence of the accident or exposure, • The findings of the investigation will be documented and the appropriate corrective actions will be taken.

Training and Instruction
Employees, managers, and supervisors must have training and instruction in both general and job specific safety and health practices before or at the time of their initial job assignments.

T
raining and instruction will be provided as follows:
• A
t the time when the IIPP is first established,
• For every new employee as they undergo new hire training, • Employees who are in construction are provided training through a Cal/OSHA approved construction industr y o
ccupational safety and health training program,
• All employees that have new job assignments for which they have not been previously trained, • When new substances, processes, procedures and/or equipment that poses new hazards are introduced to the workplace
,
• W
hen the employer has been advised of a new or previously unidentified hazard.

A
ll supervisors will have training to familiarize them with the health and safety hazards that pose potential risks to worker s who are under their immediate direction and control. Every employee will receive training on the particular hazards involved in their job assignment. Workplace safety and health training shall include, but are not limited to, the following:
• Di
sclosure of the IIPP, action plan for emergencies, fire prevention plan and methods for reporting injuries as we ll as unsafe working conditions and practices,
• Proper use of protective clothing including gloves, footwear and personal protection equipment, • Disclosure of the chemical hazards to which employees may be potentially exposed, along with other hazard program information,
• The location of toilets, hand washing stations and water drinking facilities, • The provision of medical services, first aid and emergency procedures, • Specific instruction to all employees about hazards, which are unique to their job assignment, in instances where th e
i
nformation was not provided in other training.

Record Keeping | Documentation
The following steps have been taken or are being taken to implement and maintain the IIPP:
• Re
cords of hazard inspections detailing the person(s) who conducted the inspections, the unsafe conditions and work practices that have been identified and the corrective action implemented to ameliorate the unsafe conditions an d w
ork practices, all of which is recorded on the hazard assessment and correction forms, • Documentation of safety and health training for each employee, including the names of each employee, the dates of training, the type of training and the training providers, • Inspection records and training documentation will be maintained for one year, except for those employees that hav e
wo
rked for less than one year.
351
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 6
Appendix
The following IIPP supporting forms are located at the end of this document. Each document shall be used in conjunction with the IIPP and shall be used to record all IIPP actions:
• Ha
zard Identification Checklist
• Hazard Assessment | Abatement Record
• Incident Investigation Record
• Training and Instruction Record
• Mandatory Training Subject List
352
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 7

HAZARD IDENTIFICATION CHECKLIST
The following checklist and abatement record (at bottom of this document) can be used to identify, evaluate and abate (correct) hazards in your workplace. The checklist covers a wide variety of workplace safety and health hazards. All of the topics covered in the checklist may not apply to your particular workplace. When evaluating your workplace use the sections of the checklist that “do” apply to your workplace and work activities.

GEN

ERAL WORK ENVIRONMENT
 Are all worksites clean and orderly?
 Are work surfaces kept dry or appropriate means taken to assure the surfaces are slip-resistant?  Are all spilled materials or liquids cleaned up immediately?  Is combustible scrap, debris and waste stored safely and removed from the worksite promptly?  Is accumulated combustible dust routinely removed from elevated surfaces, including the overhead structure of buildings?
 Is combustible dust cleaned up with a vacuum system to prevent the dust going into suspension?  Is metallic or conductive dust prevented from entering or accumulation on or around electrical enclosures or equipment?
 Are covered metal waste cans used for oily and paint-soaked waste?  Are all oil and gas fired devices equipped with flame failure controls that will prevent flow of fuel if pilots or main burners are not working?
 Are paint spray booths, dip tanks and the like cleaned regularly?  Are the minimum number of toilets and washing facilities provided?  Are all toilets and washing facilities clean and sanitary?  Are all work areas adequately illuminated?
 Are pits and floor openings covered or otherwise guarded?

PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
 Are protective goggles or face shields provided and worn where there is any danger of flying particles or corrosive materials?
 Are approved safety glasses required to be worn at all times in areas where there is a risk of eye injuries such as punctures, abrasions, contusions or burns?
 Are employees who need corrective lenses (glasses or contacts lenses) in working environments with harmful exposures, required to wear only approved safety glasses, protective goggles, or use other medically approved precautionary procedures?
 Are protective gloves, aprons, shields, or other means provided against cuts, corrosive liquids and chemicals?  Are hard hats provided and worn where danger of falling objects exists?  Are hard hats inspected periodically for damage to the shell and suspension system?  Is appropriate foot protection required where there is the risk of foot injuries from hot, corrosive, poisonous substances, falling objects, crushing or penetrating actions?  Are approved respirators provided for regular or emergency use where needed?  Is all protective equipment maintained in a sanitary condition and ready for use?  Do you have eye wash facilities and a quick drench shower within the work area where employees are exposed to injurious corrosive materials?
 Where special equipment is needed for electrical workers, is it available?  When lunches are eaten on the premises, are they eaten in areas where there is no exposure to toxic materials or other health hazards?
 Is protection against the effects of occupational noise exposure provided when sound levels exceed those of the Cal/OSHA noise standard?
353
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 8

WALKWAYS
 Are aisles and passageways kept clear?
 Are aisles and walkways marked as appropriate?
 Are wet surfaces covered with non-slip materials?
 Are holes in the floor, sidewalk or other walking surface repaired properly, covered or otherwise made safe?  Is there safe clearance for walking in aisles where motorized or mechanical handling equipment is operating.  Are spilled materials cleaned up immediately?
 Are materials or equipment stored in such a way that sharp projectiles will not interfere with the walkway?  Are changes of direction or elevations readily identifiable?  Are aisles or walkways that pass near moving or operating machinery, welding operations or similar operations arranged so employees will not be subjected to potential hazards?  Is adequate headroom provided for the entire length of any aisle or walkway?  Are standard guardrails provided wherever aisle or walkway surfaces are elevated more than 30 inches above any adjacent floor or the ground?
 Are bridges provided over conveyors and similar hazards?

FLOOR AND WALL STAIRWAYS
 Are floor openings guarded by a cover, guardrail, or equivalent on all sides (except at entrance to stairways or ladders)?
 Are toeboards installed around the edges of a permanent floor opening (where persons may pass below the opening)?
 Are skylight screens of such construction and mounting that they will withstand a load of at least 200 pounds?  Is the glass in windows, doors, glass walls that are subject to human impact, of sufficient thickness and type for the condition of use?
 Are grates or similar type covers over floor openings such as floor drains, of such design that foot traffic or rolling equipment will not be affected by the grate spacing?  Are unused portions of service pits and pits not actually in use either covered or protected by guardrails or equivalent?
 Are manhole covers, trench covers and similar covers, plus their supports, designed to carry a truck rear axle load of at least 20,000 pounds when located in roadways and subject to vehicle traffic?  Are floor or wall openings in fire resistive construction provided with doors or covers compatible with the fire rating of the structure and provided with self-closing feature when appropriate?

STAIRS & STAIRWAYS
 Are standard stair rails or handrails on all stairways having four or more risers?  Are all stairways at least 22 inches wide?
 Do stairs have at least a 6'6" overhead clearance?
 Do stairs angle no more than 50 and no less than 30 degrees?  Are stairs of hollow-pan type treads and landings filled to noising level with solid material?  Are step risers on stairs uniform from top to bottom, with no riser spacing greater than 7-1/2 inches?  Are steps on stairs and stairways designed or provided with a surface that renders them slip resistant?  Are stairway handrails located between 30 and 34 inches above the leading edge of stair treads?  Do stairway handrails have a least 1-1/2 inches of clearance between the handrails and the wall or surface they are mounted on?
 Are stairway handrails capable of withstanding a load of 200 pounds, applied in any direction?  Where stairs or stairways exit directly into any area where vehicles may be operated, are adequate barriers and warnings provided to prevent employees stepping into the path of traffic?  Do stairway landings have a dimension measured in the direction of travel, at least equal to width of the 354
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 9
stairway?
 Is the vertical distance between stairway landings limited to 12 feet or less? 355
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 10

ELEVATED SURFACES
 Are signs posted, when appropriate, showing the elevated surface load capacity?  Are surfaces elevated more than 30 inches above the floor or ground provided with standard guardrails?  Are all elevated surfaces (beneath which people or machinery could be exposed to falling objects) provided with standard 4-inch toeboards?
 Is a permanent means of access and egress provided to elevated storage and work surfaces?  Is required headroom provided where necessary?
 Is material on elevated surfaces piled, stacked or racked in a manner to prevent it from tipping, falling, collapsing, rolling or spreading?
 Are dock boards or bridge plates used when transferring materials between docks and trucks or rail cars?

EXITING OR EGRESS
 Are all exits marked with an exit sign and illuminated by a reliable light source?  Are the directions to exits, when not immediately apparent, marked with visible signs?  Are doors, passageways or stairways, that are neither exits nor access to exits and which could be mistaken for exits, appropriately marked "NOT AN EXIT", "TO BASEMENT", "STOREROOM", and the like?  Are exit signs provided with the word "EXIT" in lettering at least 5 inches high and the stroke of the lettering at least 1/2 inch wide?
 Are exit doors side-hinged?
 Are all exits kept free of obstructions?
 Are at least two means of egress provided from elevated platforms, pits or rooms where the absence of a second exit would increase the risk of injury from hot, poisonous, corrosive, suffocating, flammable, or explosive substances?
 Are there sufficient exits to permit prompt escape in case of emergency?  Are special precautions taken to protect employees during construction and repair operations?  Is the number of exits from each floor of a building, and the number of exits from the building itself, appropriate for the building occupancy load?
 Are exit stairways which are required to be separated from other parts of a building enclosed by at least two hour fire-resistive construction in buildings more than four stories in height, and not less than one-hour fire resistive construction elsewhere?
 When ramps are used as part of required exiting from a building, is the ramp slope limited to 1- foot vertical and 12 feet horizontal?
 Where exiting will be through frameless glass doors, glass exit doors, storm doors, and such are the doors fully tempered and meet the safety requirements for human impact?

EXIT DOORS
 Are doors that are required to serve as exits designed and constructed so that the way of exit travel is obvious and direct?
 Are windows that could be mistaken for exit doors, made inaccessible by means of barriers or railings?  Are exit doors openable from the direction of exit travel without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort, when the building is occupied?
 Is a revolving, sliding or overhead door prohibited from serving as a required exit door?  Where panic hardware is installed on a required exit door, will it allow the door to open by applying a force of 15 pounds or less in the direction of the exit traffic?  Are doors on cold storage rooms provided with an inside release mechanism that will release the latch and open the door even if it's padlocked or otherwise locked on the outside?  Where exit doors open directly onto any street, alley or other area where vehicles may be operated, are adequate barriers and warnings provided to prevent employees stepping into the path of traffic?  Are doors that swing in both directions and are located between rooms where there is frequent traffic, provided 356
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 11
with viewing panels in each door?
357
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 12

PORTABLE LADDERS
 Are all ladders maintained in good condition, joints between steps and side rails tight, all hardware and fittings securely attached, and moveable parts operating freely without binding or undue play?  Are non-slip safety feet provided on each ladder?
 Are non-slip safety feet provided on each metal or rung ladder?  Are ladder rungs and steps free of grease and oil?
 Is it prohibited to place a ladder in front of doors opening toward the ladder except when the door is blocked open, locked or guarded?
 Is it prohibited to place ladders on boxes, barrels, or other unstable bases to obtain additional height?  Are employees instructed to face the ladder when ascending or descending?  Are employees prohibited from using ladders that are broken, missing steps, rungs, or cleats, broken side rails or other faulty equipment?
 Are employees instructed not to use the top 2 steps of ordinary stepladders as a step?  When portable rung ladders are used to gain access to elevated platforms, roofs, and the like does the ladder always extend at least 3 feet above the elevated surface?  Is it required that when portable rung or cleat type ladders are used the base is so placed that slipping will not occur, or it is lashed or otherwise held in place?
 Are portable metal ladders legibly marked with signs reading "CAUTION" "Do Not Use Around Electrical Equipment" or equivalent wording?
 Are employees prohibited from using ladders as guys, braces, skids, gin poles, or for other than their intended purposes?
 Are employees instructed to only adjust extension ladders while standing at a base (not while standing on the ladder or from a position above the ladder)?
 Are metal ladders inspected for damage?
 Are the rungs of ladders uniformly spaced at 12 inches, center to center?

HAND TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
 Are all tools and equipment (both, company and employee-owned) used by employees at their workplace in good condition?
 Are hand tools such as chisels, punches, which develop mushroomed heads during use, reconditioned or replaced as necessary?
 Are broken or fractured handles on hammers, axes and similar equipment replaced promptly?  Are worn or bent wrenches replaced regularly?
 Are appropriate handles used on files and similar tools?  Are employees made aware of the hazards caused by faulty or improperly used hand tools?  Are appropriate safety glasses, face shields, and similar equipment used while using hand tools or equipment that might produce flying materials or be subject to breakage?  Are jacks checked periodically to assure they are in good operating condition?  Are tool handles wedged tightly in the head of all tools?  Are tool cutting edges kept sharp so the tool will move smoothly without binding or skipping?  Are tools stored in dry, secure location where they won't be tampered with?  Is eye and face protection used when driving hardened or tempered spuds or nails?

PORTABLE (POWER OPERATED) TOOLS & EQUIPMENT
 Are grinders, saws, and similar equipment provided with appropriate safety guards?  Are power tools used with the correct shield, guard or attachment recommended by the manufacturer?  Are portable circular saws equipped with guards above and below the base shoe?  Are circular saw guards checked to assure they are not wedged up, thus leaving the lower portion of the blade unguarded?
358
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 13
 Are rotating or moving parts of equipment guarded to prevent physical contact? 359
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 14
 Are all cord-connected, electrically operated tools and equipment effectively grounded or of the approved double insulated type?
 Are effective guards in place over belts, pulleys, chains, and sprockets, on equipment such as concrete mixers, air compressors, and the like?
 Are portable fans provided with full guards or screens having openings 1/2 inch or less?  Is hoisting equipment available and used for lifting heavy objects, and are hoist ratings and characteristics appropriate for the task?
 Are ground-fault circuit interrupters provided on all temporary electrical 15 and 20 ampere circuits, used during periods of construction?
 Are pneumatic and hydraulic hoses on power-operated tools checked regularly for deterioration or damage?

ABRASIVE WHEEL EQUIPMENT GRINDERS
 Is the work rest used and kept adjusted to within 1/8 inch of the wheel?  Is the adjustable tongue on the top side of the grinder used and kept adjusted to within 1/4 inch of the wheel?  Do side guards cover the spindle, nut, and flange and 75 percent of the wheel diameter?  Are bench and pedestal grinders permanently mounted?  Are goggles or face shields always worn when grinding?  Is the maximum RPM rating of each abrasive wheel compatible with the RPM rating of the grinder motor?  Are fixed or permanently mounted grinders connected to their electrical supply system with metallic conduit or other permanent wiring method?
 Does each grinder have an individual on and off control switch?  Is each electrically operated grinder effectively grounded?  Before new abrasive wheels are mounted, are they visually inspected and ring tested?  Are dust collectors and powered exhausts provided on grinders used in operations that produce large amounts of dust?
 Are splashguards mounted on grinders that use coolant, to prevent the coolant reaching employees?  Is cleanliness maintained around grinder?

POWDER ACTUATED TOOLS
 Are employees who operate powder-actuated tools trained in their use and carry a valid operator's card?  Do the powder-actuated tools being used have written approval of the Division of Occupational Safety and Health?
 Is each powder-actuated tool stored in its own locked container when not being used?  Is a sign at least 7" by 10" with bold type reading "POWDER-ACTUATED TOOL IN USE" conspicuously posted when the tool is being used?
 Are powder-actuated tools left unloaded until they are actually ready to be used?  Are powder-actuated tools inspected for obstructions or defects each day before use?  Do powder-actuated tools operators have and use appropriate personal protective equipment such as hard hats, safety goggles, safety shoes and ear protectors?

MACHINE GUARDING
 Is there a training program to instruct employees on safe methods of machine operation?  Is there adequate supervision to ensure that employees are following safe machine operating procedures?  Is there a regular program of safety inspection of machinery and equipment?  Is all machinery and equipment kept clean and properly maintained?  Is sufficient clearance provided around and between machines to allow for safe operations, set up and servicing, material handling and waste removal?
 Is equipment and machinery securely placed and anchored, when necessary to prevent tipping or other movement that could result in personal injury?
360
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 15
 Is there a power shut-off switch within reach of the operator's position at each machine?  Can electric power to each machine be locked out for maintenance, repair, or security? 361
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 16
 Are the noncurrent-carrying metal parts of electrically operated machines bonded and grounded?  Are foot-operated switches guarded or arranged to prevent accidental actuation by personnel or falling  Are manually operated valves and switches controlling the operation of equipment and machines clearly identified and readily accessible?
 Are all emergency stop buttons colored red?
 Are all pulleys and belts that are within 7 feet of the floor or working level properly guarded?  Are all moving chains and gears properly guarded?
 Are splashguards mounted on machines that use coolant, to prevent the coolant from reaching employees?  Are methods provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards created at the point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips, and sparks?  Are machinery guards secure and so arranged that they do not offer a hazard in their use?  If special hand tools are used for placing and removing material, do they protect the operator's hands?  Are revolving drums, barrels, and containers required to be guarded by an enclosure that is interlocked with the drive mechanism, so that revolution cannot occur unless the guard enclosure is in place, so guarded?  Do arbors and mandrels have firm and secure bearings and are they free from play?  Are provisions made to prevent machines from automatically starting when power is restored after a power failure or shutdown?
 Are machines constructed so as to be free from excessive vibration when the largest size tool is mounted and run at full speed?
 If machinery is cleaned with compressed air, is air pressure controlled and personal protective equipment or other safeguards used to protect operators and other workers from eye and body injury?  Are fan blades protected with a guard having openings no larger than 1/2 inch, when operating within 7 feet of the floor?
 Are saws used for ripping, equipped with anti-kick back devices and spreaders?  Are radial arm saws so arranged that the cutting head will gently return to the back of the table when released?

LOCKOUT BLOCKOUT PROCEDURES
 Is all machinery or equipment capable of movement, required to be de-energized or disengaged and blocked or locked out during cleaning, servicing, adjusting or setting up operations, whenever required?  Is the locking-out of control circuits in lieu of locking-out main power disconnects prohibited?  Are all equipment control valve handles provided with a means for locking-out?  Does the lockout procedure require that stored energy (i.e. mechanical, hydraulic, air,) be released or blocked before equipment is locked-out for repairs?
 Are appropriate employees provided with individually keyed personal safety locks?  Are employees required to keep personal control of their key(s) while they have safety locks in use?  Is it required that employees check the safety of the lock out by attempting a start up after making sure no one is exposed?
 Where the power disconnecting means for equipment does not also disconnect the electrical control circuit:
 Are the appropriate electrical enclosures identified?  Is means provide to assure the control circuit can also be disconnected and locked out?

WELDING, CUTTING & BRAZING
 Are only authorized and trained personnel permitted to use welding, cutting or brazing equipment?  Do all operator have a copy of the appropriate operating instructions and are they directed to follow them?  Are compressed gas cylinders regularly examined for obvious signs of defects, deep rusting, or leakage?  Is care used in handling and storage of cylinders, safety valves, relief valves, and the like, to prevent damage?
 Are precautions taken to prevent the mixture of air or oxygen with flammable gases, except at a burner or in a 362
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 17
standard torch?
363
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 18
 Are only approved apparatus (torches, regulators, pressure-reducing valves, acetylene generators, manifolds) used?
 Are cylinders kept away from sources of heat?
 Is it prohibited to use cylinders as rollers or supports?  Are empty cylinders appropriately marked their valves closed and valve-protection caps on?  Are signs reading: DANGER NO-SMOKING, MATCHES, OR OPEN LIGHTS, or the equivalent posted?  Are cylinders, cylinder valves, couplings, regulators, hoses, and apparatus keep free of oily or greasy substances?
 Is care taken not to drop or strike cylinders?
 Unless secured on special trucks, are regulators removed and valve-protection caps put in place before moving cylinders?
 Do cylinders without fixed hand wheels have keys, handles, or non-adjustable wrenches on stem valves when in service?
 Are liquefied gases stored and shipped valve-end up with valve covers in place?  Are employees instructed to never crack a fuel-gas cylinder valve near sources of ignition?  Before a regulator is removed, is the valve closed and gas released form the regulator?  Is red used to identify the acetylene (and other fuel-gas) hose, green for oxygen hose, and black for inert gas and air hose?
 Are pressure-reducing regulators used only for the gas and pressures for which they are intended?  Is open circuit (No Load) voltage of arc welding and cutting machines as low as possible and not in excess of the recommended limits?
 Under wet conditions, are automatic controls for reducing no-load voltage used?  Is grounding of the machine frame and safety ground connections of portable machines checked periodically?  Are electrodes removed from the holders when not in use?  Is it required that electric power to the welder be shut off when no one is in attendance?  Is suitable fire extinguishing equipment available for immediate use?  Is the welder forbidden to coil or loop welding electrode cable around his body?  Are wet machines thoroughly dried and tested before being used?  Are work and electrode lead cables frequently inspected for wear and damage, and replaced when needed?  Do means for connecting cables' lengths have adequate insulation?  When the object to be welded cannot be moved and fire hazards cannot be removed, are shields used to confine heat, sparks, and slag?
 Are firewatchers assigned when welding or cutting is performed, in locations where a serious fire might develop?
 Are combustible floors kept wet, covered by damp sand, or protected by fire-resistant shields?  When floors are wet down, are personnel protected from possible electrical shock?  When welding is done on metal walls, are precautions taken to protect combustibles on the other side?  Before hot work is begun, are used drums, barrels, tanks, and other containers so thoroughly cleaned that no substances remain that could explode, ignite, or produce toxic vapors?  Is it required that eye protection helmets, hand shields and goggles meet appropriate standards?  Are employees exposed to the hazards created by welding, cutting, or bracing operations protected with personal protective equipment and clothing?
 Is a check made for adequate ventilation in and where welding or cutting is preformed?  When working in confined places are environmental monitoring tests taken and means provided for quick removal of welders in case of an emergency?

COMPRESSORS & COMPRESSED AIR
 Are compressors equipped with pressure relief valves, and pressure gauges?  Are compressor air intakes installed and equipped to ensure that only clean uncontaminated air enters the 364
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 19
compressor?
 Are air filters installed on the compressor intake? 365
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 20
 Are compressors operated and lubricated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations?  Are safety devices on compressed air systems checked frequently?  Before any repair work is done on the pressure system of a compressor, is the pressure bled off and the system locked-out?
 Are signs posted to warn of the automatic starting feature of the compressors?  Is the belt drive system totally enclosed to provide protection for the front, back, top, and sides?  Is it strictly prohibited to direct compressed air towards a person?  Are employees prohibited from using highly compressed air for cleaning purposes?  If compressed air is used for cleaning off clothing, is the pressure reduced to less than 10 psi?  When using compressed air for cleaning, do employees use personal protective equipment?  Are safety chains or other suitable locking devices used at couplings of high pressure hose lines where a connection failure would create a hazard?
 Before compressed air is used to empty containers of liquid, is the safe working pressure of the container checked?
 When compressed air is used with abrasive blast cleaning equipment, is the operating valve a type that must be held open manually?
 When compressed air is used to inflate auto tires, is a clip-on chuck and an inline regulator preset to 40 psi required?
 Is it prohibited to use compressed air to clean up or move combustible dust if such action could cause the dust to be suspended in the air and cause a fire or explosion hazard?

COMPRESSED AIR RECEIVERS
 Is every receiver equipped with a pressure gauge and with one or more automatic, spring-loaded safety valves?
 Is the total relieving capacity of the safety valve capable of preventing pressure in the receiver from exceeding the maximum allowable working pressure of the receiver by more than 10 percent?  Is every air receiver provided with a drainpipe and valve at the lowest point for the removal of accumulated oil and water?
 Are compressed air receivers periodically drained of moisture and oil?  Are all safety valves tested frequently and at regular intervals to determine whether they are in good operating condition?
 Is there a current operating permit issued by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health?  Is the inlet of air receivers and piping systems kept free of accumulated oil and carbonaceous materials?

COMPRESSED GAS & CYLINDERS
 Are cylinders with a water weight capacity over 30 pounds equipped with means for connecting a valve protector device, or with a collar or recess to protect the valve?  Are cylinders legibly marked to clearly identify the gas contained?  Are compressed gas cylinders stored in areas which are protected from external heat sources such as flame impingement, intense radiant heat, electric arcs, or high temperature lines?  Are cylinders located or stored in areas where they will not be damaged by passing or falling objects, or subject to tampering by unauthorized persons?
 Are cylinders stored or transported in a manner to prevent them creating a hazard by tipping, falling or rolling?  Are cylinders containing liquefied fuel gas, stored or transported in a position so that the safety relief device is always in direct contact with the vapor space in the cylinder?  Are valve protectors always placed on cylinders when the cylinders are not in use or connected for use?  Are all valves closed off before a cylinder is moved, when the cylinder is empty, and at the completion of each job?
 Are low pressure fuel-gas cylinders checked periodically for corrosion, general distortion, cracks, or any other defect that might indicate a weakness or render it unfit for service? 366
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 21
 Does the periodic check of low pressure fuel-gas cylinders include a close inspection of the cylinders' bottom? 367
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 22

HOIST & AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT
 Is each overhead electric hoist equipped with a limit device to stop the hook travel at its highest and lowest point of safe travel?
 Will each hoist automatically stop and hold any load up to 125 percent of its rated load, if its actuating force is removed?
 Is the rated load of each hoist legibly marked and visible to the operator?  Are stops provided at the safe limits of travel for trolley hoist?  Are the controls of hoists plainly marked to indicate the direction of travel or motion?  Is each cage-controlled hoist equipped with an effective warning device?  Are close-fitting guards or other suitable devices installed on hoist to assure hoist ropes will be maintained in the sheave groves?
 Are all hoist chains or ropes of sufficient length to handle the full range of movement for the application while still maintaining two full wraps on the drum at all times?  Are nip points or contact points between hoist ropes and sheaves which are permanently located within 7 feet of the floor, ground or working platform, guarded?
 Is it prohibited to use chains or rope slings that are kinked or twisted?  Is it prohibited to use the hoist rope or chain wrapped around the load as a substitute, for a sling?  Is the operator instructed to avoid carrying loads over people?  Are only employees who have been trained in the proper use of hoists allowed to operate them?

INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS - FORKLIFTS
 Are only trained personnel allowed to operate industrial trucks?  Is substantial overhead protective equipment provided on high lift rider equipment?  Are the required lift truck operating rules posted and enforced?  Is directional lighting provided on each industrial truck that operates in an area with less than 2 foot candles per square foot of general lighting?
 Does each industrial truck have a warning horn, whistle, gong or other device which can be clearly heard above the normal noise in the areas where operated?
 Are the brakes on each industrial truck capable of bringing the vehicle to a complete and safe stop when fully loaded?
 Will the industrial truck's parking brake effectively prevent the vehicle from moving when unattended?  Are industrial trucks operating in areas where flammable gases or vapors, or combustible dust or ignitable fibers may be present in the atmosphere, approved for such locations?  Are motorized hand and hand/rider trucks so designed that the brakes are applied, and power to the drive motor shuts off when the operator releases his/her grip on the device that controls the travel?  Are industrial trucks with internal combustion engine operated in buildings or enclosed areas, carefully checked to ensure such operations do not cause harmful concentration of dangerous gases or fumes?

SPRAYING OPERATIONS
 Is adequate ventilation assured before spray operations are started?  Is mechanical ventilation provided when spraying operation is done in enclosed areas?  When mechanical ventilation is provided during spraying operations, is it so arranged that it will not circulate the contaminated air?
 Is the spray area free of hot surfaces?
 Is the spray area at least 20 feet from flames, sparks, operating electrical motors and other ignition sources?  Are portable lamps used to illuminate spray areas suitable for use in a hazardous location?  Is approved respiratory equipment provided and used when appropriate during spraying operations?  Do solvents used for cleaning have a flash point of 100E F or more? 368
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 23
 Are fire control sprinkler heads kept clean?
369
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 24
 Are "NO SMOKING" signs posted in spray areas, paint rooms, paint booths, and paint storage areas?  Is the spray area kept clean of combustible residue?  Are spray booths constructed of metal, masonry, or other substantial noncombustible material?  Are spray booth floors and baffles noncombustible and easily cleaned?  Is infrared drying apparatus kept out of the spray area during spraying operations?  Is the spray booth completely ventilated before using the drying apparatus?  Is the electric drying apparatus properly grounded?  Are lighting fixtures for spray booths located outside of the booth and the interior lighted through sealed clear panels?
 Are the electric motors for exhaust fans placed outside booths or ducts?  Are belts and pulleys inside the booth fully enclosed?  Do ducts have access doors to allow cleaning?
 Do all drying spaces have adequate ventilation?

ENTERING CONFINED SPACES
 Are confined spaces thoroughly emptied of any corrosive or hazardous substances, such as acids or caustics, before entry?
 Before entry, are all lines to a confined space, containing inert, toxic, flammable, or corrosive materials valved off and blanked or disconnected and separated?
 Is it required that all impellers, agitators, or other moving equipment inside confined spaces be locked-out if they present a hazard?
 Is either natural or mechanical ventilation provided prior to confined space entry?  Before entry, are appropriate atmospheric tests performed to check for oxygen deficiency, toxic substance and explosive concentrations in the confined space before entry?  Is adequate illumination provided for the work to be performed in the confined space?  Is the atmosphere inside the confined space frequently tested or continuously monitor during conduct of work?  Is there an assigned safety standby employee outside of the confined space, whose sole responsibility is to watch the work in progress, sound an alarm if necessary, and render assistance?  Is the standby employee or other employees prohibited from entering the confined space without lifelines and respiratory equipment if there is any questions as to the cause of an emergency?  In addition to the standby employee, is there at least one other trained rescuer in the vicinity?  Are all rescuers appropriately trained and using approved, recently inspected equipment?  Does all rescue equipment allow for lifting employees vertically from a top opening?  Are there trained personnel in First Aid and CPR immediately available?  Is there an effective communication system in place whenever respiratory equipment is used and the employee in the confined space is out of sight of the standby person?  Is approved respiratory equipment required if the atmosphere inside the confined space cannot be made acceptable?
 Is all portable electrical equipment used inside confined spaces either grounded and insulated, or equipped with ground fault protection?
 Before gas welding or burning is started in a confined space, are hoses checked for leaks, compressed gas bottles forbidden inside of the confined space, torches lighted only outside of the confined area and the confined area tested for an explosive atmosphere each time before a lighted torch is to be taken into the confined space?
 If employees will be using oxygen-consuming equipment such as salamanders, torches, furnaces, in a confined space, is sufficient air provided to assure combustion without reducing the oxygen concentration of the atmosphere below 19.5 percent by volume?
 Whenever combustion-type equipment is used in confined space, are provisions made to ensure the exhaust gases are vented outside of the enclosure?
 Is each confined space checked for decaying vegetation or animal matter, which may produce methane? 370
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 25
 Is the confined space checked for possible industrial waste, which could contain toxic properties? 371
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 26
 If the confined space is below the ground and near areas where motor vehicles will be operating, is it possible for vehicle exhaust or carbon monoxide to enter the space?

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
 Are all work areas properly illuminated?
 Are employees instructed in proper first aid and other emergency procedures?  Are hazardous substances identified which may cause harm by inhalation, ingestion, skin absorption or contact?
 Are employees aware of the hazards involved with the various chemicals they may be exposed to in their work environment, such as ammonia, chlorine, epoxies, and caustics?  Is employee exposure to chemicals in the workplace kept within acceptable levels?  Can a less harmful method or product be used?
 Is the work area's ventilation system appropriate for the work being performed?  Are spray painting operations done in spray rooms or booths equipped with an appropriate exhaust system?  Is employee exposure to welding fumes controlled by ventilation, use of respirators, exposure time, or other means?
 Are welders and other workers nearby provided with flash shields during welding operations?  If forklifts and other vehicles are used in buildings or other enclosed areas, are the carbon monoxide levels kept below maximum acceptable concentration?
 Has there been a determination that noise levels in the facilities are within acceptable levels?  Are steps being taken to use engineering controls to reduce excessive noise levels?  Are proper precautions being taken when handling asbestos and other fibrous materials?  Are caution labels and signs used to warn of asbestos?  Are wet methods used, when practicable, to prevent the emission of airborne asbestos fibers, silica dust and similar hazardous materials?
 Is vacuuming with appropriate equipment used whenever possible rather than blowing or sweeping dust?  Are grinders, saws, and other machines that produce respirable dusts vented to an industrial collector or central exhaust system?
 Are all local exhaust ventilation systems designed and operating properly such as airflow and volume necessary for the application? Are the ducts free of obstructions or the belts slipping?  Is personal protective equipment provided, used and maintained wherever required?  Are there written standard operating procedures for the selection and use of respirators where needed?  Are restrooms and washrooms kept clean and sanitary?  Is all water provided for drinking, washing, and cooking potable?  Are all outlets for water not suitable for drinking clearly identified?  Are employees' physical capacities assessed before being assigned to jobs requiring heavy work?  Are employees instructed in the proper manner of lifting heavy objects?  Where heat is a problem, have all fixed work areas been provided with spot cooling or air conditioning?  Are employees screened before assignment to areas of high heat to determine if their health condition might make them more susceptible to having an adverse reaction?  Are employees working on streets and roadways where they are exposed to the hazards of traffic, required to wear bright colored (traffic orange) warning vest?
 Are exhaust stacks and air intakes located that contaminated air will not be recirculated within a building or other enclosed area?
 Is equipment producing ultra-violet radiation properly shielded?

FLAMMABLE & COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS
 Are combustible scrap, debris and waste materials (i.e. oily rags) stored in covered metal receptacles and removed from the worksite promptly?
 Is proper storage practiced to minimize the risk of fire including spontaneous combustion? 372
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 27
 Are approved containers and tanks used for the storage and handling of flammable and combustible liquids? 373
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 28
 Are all connections on drums and combustible liquid piping, vapor and liquid tight?  Are all flammable liquids kept in closed containers when not in use (e.g. parts cleaning tanks, pans)?  Are bulk drums of flammable liquids grounded and bonded to containers during dispensing?  Do storage rooms for flammable and combustible liquids have explosion-proof lights?  Do storage rooms for flammable and combustible liquids have mechanical or gravity ventilation?  Is liquefied petroleum gas stored, handled, and used in accordance with safe practices and standards?  Are liquefied petroleum storage tanks guarded to prevent damage from vehicles?  Are all solvent wastes and flammable liquids kept in fire-resistant covered containers until they are removed from the worksite?
 Is vacuuming used whenever possible rather than blowing or sweeping combustible dust?  Are fire separators placed between containers of combustibles or flammables, when stacked one upon another, to assure their support and stability?
 Are fuel gas cylinders and oxygen cylinders separated by distance, fire resistant barriers or other means while in storage?
 Are fire extinguishers selected and provided for the types of materials in areas where they are to be used?  Class A: Ordinary combustible material fires.
 Class B: Flammable liquid, gas or grease fires.
 Class C: Energized-electrical equipment fires.
 If a Halon 1301 fire extinguisher is used, can employees evacuate within the specified time for that extinguisher?
 Are appropriate fire extinguishers mounted within 75 feet of outside areas containing flammable liquids, and within 10 feet of any inside storage area for such materials?  Is the transfer/withdrawal of flammable or combustible liquids performed by trained personnel?  Are fire extinguishers mounted so that employees do not have to travel more than 75 feet for a class "A" fire or 50 feet for a class "B" fire?
 Are employees trained in the use of fire extinguishers?  Are extinguishers free from obstructions or blockage?  Are all extinguishers serviced, maintained and tagged at intervals not to exceed one year?  Are all extinguishers fully charged and in their designated places?  Is a record maintained of required monthly checks of extinguishers?  Where sprinkler systems are permanently installed, are the nozzle heads directed or arranged so that water will not be sprayed into operating electrical switchboards and equipment?  Are "NO SMOKING" signs posted where appropriate in areas where flammable or combustible materials are used or stored?
 Are "NO SMOKING" signs posted on liquefied petroleum gas tanks?  Are "NO SMOKING" rules enforced in areas involving storage and use of flammable materials?  Are safety cans used for dispensing flammable or combustible liquids at a point of use?  Are all spills of flammable or combustible liquids cleaned up promptly?  Are storage tanks adequately vented to prevent the development of excessive vacuum or pressure as a result of filling, emptying, or atmosphere temperature changes?  Are storage tanks equipped with emergency venting that will relieve excessive internal pressure caused by fire exposure?
 Are spare portable or butane tanks, which are sued by industrial trucks stored in accord with regulations?

FIRE PROTECTION
 Do you have a fire prevention plan?
 Does your plan describe the type of fire protection equipment and/or systems?  Have you established practices and procedures to control potential fire hazards and ignition sources?  Are employees aware of the fire hazards of the material and processes to which they are exposed?  Is your local fire department well acquainted with your facilities, location and specific hazards? 374
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 29
 If you have a fire alarm system, is it tested at least annually? 375
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 30
 If you have a fire alarm system, is it certified as required?  If you have interior standpipes and valves, are they inspected regularly?  If you have outside private fire hydrants, are they flushed at least once a year and on a routine preventive maintenance schedule?
 Are fire doors and shutters in good operating condition?  Are fire doors and shutters unobstructed and protected against obstructions, including their counterweights?  Are fire door and shutter fusible links in place?
 Are automatic sprinkler system water control valves, air and water pressures checked weekly/periodically as required?
 Is maintenance of automatic sprinkler system assigned to responsible persons or to a sprinkler contractor?  Are sprinkler heads protected by metal guards, when exposed to physical damage?  Is proper clearance maintained below sprinkler heads?  Are portable fire extinguishers provided in adequate number and type?  Are fire extinguishers mounted in readily accessible locations?  Are fire extinguishers recharged regularly and noted on the inspection tag?  Are employees periodically instructed in the use of extinguishers and fire protection procedures?

HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL EXPOSURES
 Are employees trained in the safe handling practices of hazardous chemicals such as acids, caustics, and the like?
 Are employees aware of the potential hazards involving various chemicals stored or used in the workplace-- such as acids, bases, caustics, epoxies, and phenols?
 Is employee exposure to chemicals kept within acceptable levels?  Are eye wash fountains and safety showers provided in areas where corrosive chemicals are handled?  Are all containers, such as vats and storage tanks labeled as to their contents--e.g. "CAUSTICS"?  Are all employees required to use personal protective clothing and equipment when handling chemicals (i.e. gloves, eye protection, and respirators)?
 Are flammable or toxic chemicals kept in closed containers when not in use?  Are chemical piping systems clearly marked as to their content?  Where corrosive liquids are frequently handled in open containers or drawn from storage vessels or pipelines, is adequate means readily available for neutralizing or disposing of spills or overflows properly and safely?  Have standard operating procedures been established and are they being followed when cleaning up chemical spills?
 Where needed for emergency use, are respirators stored in a convenient, clean and sanitary location?  Are respirators intended for emergency use adequate for the various uses for which they may be needed?  Are employees prohibited from eating in areas where hazardous chemicals are present?  Is personal protective equipment provided, used and maintained whenever necessary?  Are there written standard operating procedures for the selection and use of respirators where needed?  If you have a respirator protection program, are your employees instructed on the correct usage and limitations of the respirators?
 Are the respirators NIOSH approved for this particular application?  Are they regularly inspected and cleaned sanitized and maintained?  If hazardous substances are used in your processes, do you have a medical or biological monitoring system in operation?
 Are you familiar with the Threshold Limit Values or Permissible Exposure Limits of airborne contaminants and physical agents used in your workplace?
 Have control procedures been instituted for hazardous materials, where appropriate, such as respirators, ventilation systems, handling practices, and the like?
 Whenever possible, are hazardous substances handled in properly designed and exhausted booths or similar locations?
376
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 31
 Do you use general dilution or local exhaust ventilation systems to control dusts, vapors, gases, fumes, smoke, solvents or mists which may be generated in your workplace? 377
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 32
 Is ventilation equipment provided for removal of contaminants from such operations as production grinding, buffing, spray painting, and/or vapor decreasing, and is it operating properly?  Do employees complain about dizziness, headaches, nausea, irritation, or other factors of discomfort when they use solvents or other chemicals?
 Is there a dermatitis problem--do employees complain about skin dryness, irritation, or sensitization?  Have you considered the use of an industrial hygienist or environmental health specialist to evaluate your operation?
 If internal combustion engines are used, is carbon monoxide kept within acceptable levels?  Is vacuuming used, rather than blowing or sweeping dusts whenever possible for clean up?  Are materials, which give off toxic asphyxiant, suffocating or anesthetic fumes, stored in remote or isolated locations when not in use?

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES COMMUNICATION
 Is there a list of hazardous substances used in your workplace?  Is there a written hazard communication program dealing with Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) labeling, and employee training?
 Who is responsible for MSDSs, container labeling, employee training?  Is each container for a hazardous substance (i.e. vats, bottles, storage tanks,) labeled with product identity and a hazard warning (communication of the specific health hazards and physical hazards)?  Is there a Material Safety Data Sheet readily available for each hazardous substance used?  How will you inform other employers whose employees share the same work area where the hazardous substances are used?
 Is there an employee training program for hazardous substances?  Does this program include:
 An explanation of what an MSDS is and how to use and obtain one?  MSDS contents for each hazardous substance or class of substances?  Explanation of "Right to Know"?
 Identification of where employees can see the employer's written hazard communication program and where hazardous substances are present in their work area?
 The physical and health hazards of substances in the work area, how to detect their presence, and specific protective measures to be used?
 Details of the hazard communication program, including how to use the labeling system and MSDSs?  How employees will be informed of hazards of non-routine tasks, and hazards of unlabeled pipes?

ELECTRICAL
 Are your workplace electricians familiar with the Cal/OSHA Electrical Safety Orders?  Do you specify compliance with Cal/OSHA for all contract electrical work?  Are all employees required to report as soon as practicable any obvious hazard to life or property observed in connection with electrical equipment or lines?
 Are employees instructed to make preliminary inspections and/or appropriate tests to determine what conditions exist before starting work on electrical equipment or lines?  When electrical equipment or lines are to be serviced, maintained or adjusted, are necessary switches opened, locked-out and tagged whenever possible?
 Are portable electrical tools and equipment grounded or of the double insulated type?  Are electrical appliances such as vacuum cleaners, polishers, vending machines grounded?  Do extension cords being used have a grounding conductor?  Are multiple plug adapters prohibited?
 Are ground-fault circuit interrupters installed on each temporary 15 or 20 ampere, 120 volt AC circuit at locations where construction, demolition, modifications, alterations or excavations are being performed?  Are all temporary circuits protected by suitable disconnecting switches or plug connectors at the junction with 378
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 33
permanent wiring?
 Is exposed wiring and cords with frayed or deteriorated insulation repaired or replaced promptly? 379
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 34
 Are flexible cords and cables free of splices or taps?  Are clamps or other securing means provided on flexible cords or cables at plugs, receptacles, tools, and equipment and is the cord jacket securely held in place?  Are all cord, cable and raceway connections intact and secure?  In wet or damp locations, are electrical tools and equipment appropriate for the use or location or otherwise protected?
 Is the location of electrical power lines and cables (overhead, underground, underfloor, other side of walls) determined before digging, drilling or similar work is begun?  Are metal measuring tapes, ropes, handlines or similar devices with metallic thread woven into the fabric prohibited where they could come in contact with energized parts of equipment or circuit conductors?  Is the use of metal ladders prohibited in area where the ladder or the person using the ladder could come in contact with energized parts of equipment, fixtures or circuit conductors?  Are all disconnecting switches and circuit breakers labeled to indicate their use or equipment served?  Are disconnecting means always opened before fuses are replaced?  Do all interior wiring systems include provisions for grounding metal parts of electrical raceways, equipment and enclosures?
 Are all electrical raceways and enclosures securely fastened in place?  Are all energized parts of electrical circuits and equipment guarded against accidental contact by approved cabinets or enclosures?
 Is sufficient access and working space provided and maintained about all electrical equipment to permit ready and safe operations and maintenance?
 Are all unused openings (including conduit knockouts) in electrical enclosures and fittings closed with appropriate covers, plugs or plates?
 Are electrical enclosures such as switches, receptacles, junction boxes, etc., provided with tight-fitting covers or plates?
 Are disconnecting switches for electrical motors in excess of two horsepower, capable of opening the circuit when the motor is in a stalled condition, without exploding? (Switches must be horsepower rated equal to or in excess of the motor hp rating).
 Is low voltage protection provided in the control device of motors driving machines or equipment, which could cause probably injury from inadvertent starting?
 Is each motor disconnecting switch or circuit breaker located within sight of the motor control device?  Is each motor located within sight of its controller or the controller disconnecting means capable of being locked in the open position or is a separate disconnecting means installed in the circuit within sight of the motor?
 Is the controller for each motor in excess of two horsepower, rated in horsepower equal to or in excess of the rating of the motor is serves?
 Are employees who regularly work on or around energized electrical equipment or lines instructed in the cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) methods?
 Are employees prohibited from working alone on energized lines or equipment over 600 volts? NOISE
 Are there areas in the workplace where continuous noise levels exceed 85 dBA? (To determine maximum allowable levels for intermittent or impact noise, see Title 8, Section 5097.)  Are noise levels being measured using a sound level meter or an octave band analyzer and records being kept?
 Have you tried isolating noisy machinery from the rest of your operation?  Have engineering controls been used to reduce excessive noise levels?  Where engineering controls are determined not feasible, are administrative controls (i.e. worker rotation) being used to minimize individual employee exposure to noise?  Is there an ongoing preventive health program to educate employees in safe levels of noise and exposure, effects of noise on their health, and use of personal protection?  Is the training repeated annually for employees exposed to continuous noise above 85 dBA? 380
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 35
 Have work areas where noise levels make voice communication between employees difficult been identified and posted?
381
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 36
 Is approved hearing protective equipment (noise attenuating devices) available to every employee working in areas where continuous noise levels exceed 85 dBA?
 If you use ear protectors, are employees properly fitted and instructed in their use and care?  Are employees exposed to continuous noise above 85 dBA given periodic audiometric testing to ensure that you have an effective hearing protection system?

FUELING
 Is it prohibited to fuel an internal combustion engine with a flammable liquid while the engine is running?  Are fueling operations done in such a manner that likelihood of spillage will be minimal?  When spillage occurs during fueling operations, is the spilled fuel cleaned up completely, evaporated, or other measures taken to control vapors before restarting the engine?  Are fuel tank caps replaced and secured before starting the engine?  In fueling operations is there always metal contact between the container and fuel tank?  Are fueling hoses of a type designed to handle the specific type of fuel?  Is it prohibited to handle or transfer gasoline in open containers?  Are open lights, open flames, or sparking or arcing equipment prohibited near fueling or transfer of fuel operations?
 Is smoking prohibited in the vicinity of fueling operations?  Are fueling operations prohibited in building or other enclosed areas that are not specifically ventilated for this purpose?
 Where fueling or transfer of fuel is done through a gravity flow system, are the nozzles of the self-closing type?

IDENTIFICATION OF PIPING SYSTEMS
 When nonpotable water is piped through a facility, are outlets or taps posted to alert employees that it is unsafe and not to be used for drinking, washing or other personal use?  When hazardous substances are transported through above ground piping, is each pipeline identified at points where confusion could introduce hazards to employees?
 When pipelines are identified by color painting, are all visible parts of the line so identified?  When pipelines are identified by color painted bands or tapes, are the bands or tapes located at reasonable intervals and at each outlet, valve or connection?
 When pipelines are identified by color, is the color code posted at all locations where confusion could introduce hazards to employees?
 When the contents of pipelines are identified by name or name abbreviation, is the information readily visible on the pipe near each valve or outlet?
 When pipelines carrying hazardous substances are identified by tags, are the tags constructed of durable materials, the message carried clearly ad permanently distinguishable and are tags installed at each valve or outlet?
 When pipelines are heated by electricity, steam or other external source, are suitable warning signs or tags placed at unions, valves, or other serviceable parts of the system?

MATERIAL HANDLING
 Is there safe clearance for equipment through aisles and doorways?  Are aisleways designated, permanently marked, and kept clear to allow unhindered passage?  Are motorized vehicles and mechanized equipment inspected daily or prior to use?  Are vehicles shut off and brakes set prior to loading or unloading?  Are containers or combustibles or flammables, when stacked while being moved, always separated by dunnage sufficient to provide stability?
 Are dock boards (bridge plates) used when loading or unloading operations are taking place between vehicles and docks?
382
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 37
 Are trucks and trailers secured from movement during loading and unloading operations? 383
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 38
 Are dock plates and loading ramps constructed and maintained with sufficient strength to support imposed loading?
 Are hand trucks maintained in safe operating condition?  Are chutes equipped with sideboards of sufficient height to prevent the materials being handled from falling off?
 Are chutes and gravity roller sections firmly placed or secured to prevent displacement?  At the delivery end of rollers or chutes, are provisions made to brake the movement of the handled materials.  Are pallets usually inspected before being loaded or moved?  Are hooks with safety latches or other arrangements used when hoisting materials so that slings or load attachments won't accidentally slip off the hoist hooks?  Are securing chains, ropes, chockers or slings adequate for the job to be performed?  When hoisting material or equipment, are provisions made to assure no one will be passing under the suspended loads?
 Are Material Safety Data Sheets available to employees handling hazardous substances?

TRANSPORTING EMPLOYEES & MATERIALS
 Do employees who operate vehicles on public thoroughfares have valid operator's licenses?  When seven or more employees are regularly transported in a van, bus or truck, is the operator's license appropriate for the class of vehicle being driven?
 Is each van, bus or truck used regularly to transport employees, equipped with an adequate number of seats?  When employees are transported by truck, are provision provided to prevent their falling from the vehicle?  Are vehicles used to transport employees, equipped with lamps, brakes, horns, mirrors, windshields and turn signals in good repair?
 Are transport vehicles provided with handrails, steps, stirrups or similar devices, so placed and arranged that employees can safely mount or dismount?
 Are employee transport vehicles equipped at all times with at least two reflective type flares?  Is a full charged fire extinguisher, in good condition, with at least 4 B:C rating maintained in each employee transport vehicle?
 When cutting tools with sharp edges are carried in passenger compartments of employee transport vehicles, are they placed in closed boxes or containers which are secured in place?  Are employees prohibited from riding on top of any load, which can shift, topple, or otherwise become unstable?

CONTROL OF HARMFUL SUBSTANCES BY VENTILATION
 Is the volume and velocity of air in each exhaust system sufficient to gather the dusts, fumes, mists, vapors or gases to be controlled, and to convey them to a suitable point of disposal?  Are exhaust inlets, ducts and plenums designed, constructed, and supported to prevent collapse or failure of any part of the system?
 Are clean-out ports or doors provided at intervals not to exceed 12 feet in all horizontal runs of exhaust ducts?  Where two or more different type of operations are being controlled through the same exhaust system, will the combination of substances being controlled, constitute a fire, explosion or chemical reaction hazard in the duct?
 Is adequate makeup air provided to areas where exhaust systems are operating?  Is the intake for makeup air located so that only clean, fresh air, which is free of contaminates, will enter the work environment?
 Where two or more ventilation systems are serving a work area, is their operation such that one will not offset the functions of the other?

SANITIZING EQUIPMENT & CLOTHING
384
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 39
 Is personal protective clothing or equipment, that employees are required to wear or use, of a type capable of being easily cleaned and disinfected?
 Are employees prohibited from interchanging personal protective clothing or equipment, unless it has been properly cleaned?
 Are machines and equipment, which processes, handle or apply materials that could be injurious to employees, cleaned and/or decontaminated before being overhauled or placed in storage?  Are employees prohibited from smoking or eating in any area where contaminates are present that could be injurious if ingested?
 When employees are required to change from street clothing into protective clothing, is a clean changeroom with separate storage facility for street and protective clothing provided?  Are employees required to shower and wash their hair as soon as possible after a known contact has occurred with a carcinogen?
 When equipment, materials, or other items are taken into or removed from a carcinogen regulated area, is it done in a manner that will not contaminate non-regulated areas or the external environment?

TIRE INFLATION
 Where tires are mounted and/or inflated on drop center wheels is a safe practice procedure posted and enforced?
 Where tires are mounted and/or inflated on wheels with split rims and/or retainer rings is a safe practice procedure posted and enforced?
 Does each tire inflation hose have a clip-on chuck with at least 24 inches of hose between the chuck and an in- line hand valve and gauge?
 Does the tire inflation control valve automatically shut off the airflow when the valve is released?  Is a tire restraining device such as a cage, rack or other effective means used while inflating tires mounted on split rims, or rims using retainer rings?
 Are employees strictly forbidden from taking a position directly over or in front of a tire while it's being inflated?

EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN
 Are you required to have an emergency action plan?
 Does the emergency action plan comply with requirements of T8CCR 3220(a)?  Have emergency escape procedures and routes been developed and communicated to all employers?  Do employees, who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate, know the proper procedures?
 Is the employee alarm system that provides a warning for emergency action recognizable and perceptible above ambient conditions?
 Are alarm systems properly maintained and tested regularly?  Is the emergency action plan reviewed and revised periodically?  Do employees now their responsibilities:
 For reporting emergencies?
 During an emergency?
 For conducting rescue and medical duties?

INFECTION CONTROL
 Are employees potentially exposed to infectious agents in body fluids?  Have occasions of potential occupational exposure been identified and documented?  Has a training and information program been provided for employees exposed to or potentially exposed to blood and/or body fluids?
 Have infection control procedures been instituted where appropriate, such as ventilation, universal precautions, workplace practices, and personal protective equipment? 385
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 40
 Are employees aware of specific workplace practices to follow when appropriate? (Hand washing, handling sharp instruments, handling of laundry, disposal of contaminated materials, reusable equipment.) 386
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 41
 Is personal protective equipment provided to employees, and in all appropriate locations?  Is the necessary equipment (i.e. mouthpieces, resuscitation bags, and other ventilation devices) provided for administering mouth-to-mouth resuscitation on potentially infected patients?  Are facilities/equipment to comply with workplace practices available, such as hand-washing sinks, biohazard tags and labels, needle containers, detergents/disinfectants to clean up spills?  Are all equipment and environmental and working surfaces cleaned and disinfected after contact with blood or potentially infectious materials?
 Is infectious waste placed in closable, leak proof containers, bags or puncture-resistant holders with proper labels?
 Has medical surveillance including HBV evaluation, antibody testing and vaccination been made available to potentially exposed employees?
 Training on universal precautions?
 Training on personal protective equipment?
 Training on workplace practices, which should include blood drawing, room cleaning, laundry handling, clean up of blood spills?
 Training on needlestick exposure/management?
 Hepatitis B vaccinations?

ERGONOMICS
 Can the work be performed without eyestrain or glare to the employees?  Does the task require prolonged raising of the arms?  Do the neck and shoulders have to be stooped to view the task?  Are there pressure points on any parts of the body (wrists, forearms, back of thighs)?  Can the work be done using the larger muscles of the body?  Can the work be done without twisting or overly bending the lower back?  Are there sufficient rest breaks, in addition to the regular rest breaks, to relieve stress from repetitive-motion tasks?
 Are tools, instruments and machinery shaped, positioned and handled so that tasks can be performed comfortably?
 Are all pieces of furniture adjusted, positioned and arranged to minimize strain on all parts of the body?

VENTILATION FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY
 Does your HVAC system provide at least the quantity of outdoor air required by the State Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part 2 at the time the building was constructed?  Is the HVAC system inspected at least annually, and problems corrected?  Are inspection records retained for at least 5 years?

CRANE CHECKLIST
 Are the cranes visually inspected for defective components prior to the beginning of any work shift?  Are all electrically operated cranes effectively grounded?  Is a crane preventive maintenance program established?  Is the load chart clearly visible to the operator?
 Are operating controls clearly identified?
 Is a fire extinguisher provided at the operator's station?  Is the rated capacity visibly marked on each crane?  Is an audible warning device mounted on each crane?  Is sufficient illumination provided for the operator to perform the work safely?  Are cranes of such design, that the boom could fall over backward, equipped with boomstops? 387
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 42
 Does each crane have a certificate indicating that required testing and examinations have been performed?  Are crane inspection and maintenance records maintained and available for inspection? 388
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 43
HAZARD ASSESSMENT | ABATEMENT RECORD
This hazard assessment | abatement record shall be kept on file for at least 3 years after the hazard has been abated or mitigated.

Al
l hazards should be corrected as soon as possible, based on the severity of the hazard. If a serious imminent hazard cannot be immediately corrected, evacuate personnel from the area and restrict access until the hazard can be addressed.

Supervisor/Safety Coordinator Name: Telephone:

Supervisor/Safety Coordinator Signature: Date:

Description and
Location of Unsafe
Condition
Date
Discovered
Required Action and
Responsible Party
Completion Date
Projected A ctual
389
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 44

INCIDENT INVESTIGATION RECORD
This incident (accident, illness, exposure, etc.) investigation record shall be kept on file for at least 3 years after the date of occurrence. All affected employees and applicable third parties shall be provide a copy of incident records upon request.

Incident Information
Name(s) of Affected Employee(s): Date of Incident:

Work Area of Affected Employee(s): Date Investigation Began:

Describe Nature of Incident:

Part(s) of Body Affected:

Describe Medical Treatment Administered:

Witness Information
Witness #1 Name: Phone:

Witness’s Description of Incident:

Witness’s Signature:

Witness #2 Name: Phone:

Witness’s Description of Incident:

Witness’s Signature:
390
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 45
Investigation Results
List contributing factors/root causes:

Was a mandatory safe work practice violated? Yes No
Was the unsafe condition, practice or protective equipment problem corrected immediately?
If
no, what has been done to ensure correction?
Yes No
Do additional mandatory safe work practices need to be implemented? If
yes, please describe safe work practice:

Yes No
List corrective actions taken and date implemented:

Signature of Investigator: Date:

Signature of Person Responsible for Corrective Actions: Date:
391
IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 46
TRAINING | INSTRUCTION RECORD
This training and instruction record shall be kept on file for at least 3 years after the termination of the employee’s employment. All applicable third parties shall be provided a copy of training records upon request.

Employee Name(s) Training Date(s) Training Subject(s) Instructor Name(s) 392
FDFFF IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 47
Mandatory Training Subjects for All Employees
Training Subject Method of Instruction Instructor | Training Source Name IIPP (Injury & Illness Prevention Program on-site Safety Manager Code of Safe Work Practices on-site Safety Manager
Emergency Action Plan on-site Safety Manager
Ergonomics on-site Safety Manager
Hazard Communication on-site Safety Manager
Materials Handling on-site Safety Manager
Office Safety (general) on-site Safety Manager
New Hire Safety Orientation on-site Safety Manager
Additional Training Subjects (make any of the following subjects mandatory training) Training Subject
Applicable
Standards Course No. Affected Employees Frequency Estimated Hours Instructor | Training
Source Name
Accident Prevention Signs and Tags 145 N/A Field Employees Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Asbestos Abatement Training (OSHA Class I
and II) 1001 N/A Employees exposed to asbestos Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary Asbestos Awareness Training (OSHA Class IV) 1001 N/A
Employees potentially exposed to
asbestos Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary
Asbestos Operations and Maintenance Training
(OSHA Class III) 1001 N/A Employees exposed to asbestos Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary Bloodborne Pathogens 1030 N/A
Employees with occupational
exposure, first aid responders,
police Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary
Chainsaw Safety 266 N/A
Employees using chainsaws as
part of their job Initial 1 Update as necessary
Compressed Gas Safety 101 N/A
Employees using compressed
gases Initial 1 Update as necessary
Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) 147 N/A
Employees that may service or
maintain equipment Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Crane, derrick, and hoist safety Subpart N N/A
Employees using/operating
applicable equipment
Initial/Regularly
thereafter 1 Update as necessary
Diving Safety 410 N/A
Employees involved in underwater
diving Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary
Drivers Safety UAF mandated N/A
Any employee who drives a UAF
vehicle or rents one for UAF
related work
If taken after January
1, 2003 - no
refresher needed. 1 Update as necessary
Electrical Safety-Related Work 332 N/A
Employees working with electrical
equipment Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary
Emergency Action Plan 38 N/A All
Initial / Periodic
Change in Plan 1 Update as necessary
Ethylene Oxide (ETO) 1047 N/A Employees exposed to ETO Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary 393
FDFFF IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 48
Explosive or Blasting Agents 109 N/A
Employees that use, handle, store,
or transport, these products Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Fall Protection 66 App C N/A All exposed workers
Initial / Periodic
New Hazard or
Equipment 1 Update as necessary
Fire Extinguishing System(s) 160 N/A
Employees who inspect and/or
maintain these systems Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary Fire Prevention Plan 38 N/A All Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Formaldehyde 1048(n) N/A
Employees with exposure at or
above 0.1 ppm Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary
Hazard Communication 1200 N/A
All employees exposed to hazardous
chemicals (excluding labs), infectious
agents, or pesticides
Initial / Periodic New
Hazard 1 Update as necessary
Hazardous Waste Management N/A
All employees working with chemicals
and generating hazardous waste Initial 1 Update as necessary Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response 120 N/A
Personnel expected to respond to
an uncontrolled release Initial/Annual 1 Update as necessary Hearing Protection 95 N/A
Employees working in high noise
areas Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary
Hydrofluoric Acid N/A
Employees and students who use
hydrofluoric acid Initial 1 Update as necessary
Job Hazard Analysis Subpart I, App B N/A
Employees exposed to workplace
hazard Initial/New Hazards 1 Update as necessary
Laboratory Safety 1450 N/A
All laboratory employees, new
exposures
Initial / refresher
every 2 yrs 1 Update as necessary
Ladder Safety 25, 26, 27 N/A
Employees using applicable
ladders
Initial/Change in
equipment 1 Update as necessary
Laser Safety N/A
All employees that use lasers
(Class 2 or higher) Initial 1 Update as necessary
Lead 1025 N/A Employees exposed to lead
Initial Assignment /
Annual at or above
Action Level 1 Update as necessary
Mechanical Power Presses 217 N/A
Employees exposed to power
presses Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary
Medical Services and First Aid (recommended
for general employees) 151 N/A
First aid providers and any other
employee
Every 2 years for
providers; 1 year for
others 1 Update as necessary
Methylene Chloride 1052 N/A Employees with exposure Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary New Employee Orientation N/A All Initial 1 Update as necessary Ergonomics, Office and Labs (recommended) N/A Any Initial 1 Update as necessary Operations of Powered Platforms 66 N/A
Employees using powered
platforms Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary
Permit Required Confined Space 146 N/A

1. Authorized entrants/attendants,

2. rescue personnel

1. Initial / Periodic 2.

Initial/Annual 1 Update as necessary
Personal Protective Equipment 132 N/A Employees required to use PPE Initial / Change in
work place/PPE use 1
Supervisor (For large
groups, EHS&RM can be of
assistance)
394
FDFFF IIPP / DEARK E&C. ( rev. 2025) 49
Pesticide Safety EPA mandated N/A
All agricultural workers and
pesticide handlers
Initial / refresher
every 5 years 1 Update as necessary
Portable Fire Extinguishers 157 N/A
Employees with extinguishers in their
work area Initial / Annual 1 Update as necessary
Powered Industrial Trucks 178 N/A All designated operators or forklifts Initial / Every 3 years 1 Update as necessary Process Safety Management of Highly
Hazardous Chemicals 119 N/A
Employees with processes involving a
flammable liquid or gas in excess of 10,000
lbs or a chemical at or above the threshold
amount (App A)
Call EHS&RM if your
department is in this
category 1 Update as necessary
Radiation Safety NRC requirement N/A
Employees using radioactive
materials Initial 1 Update as necessary
Record keeping N/A (Included in New Employee Orientation) 1 Respiratory Protection 134 N/A
All employees required to wear a
respirator of any type
Initial / Annually
New Hazard 1 Update as necessary
Scaffold User Safety N/A
All employees required to build or
work on scaffolds Initial 1 Update as necessary
Servicing of Multi-Piece and Single-Piece Rim
Wheels 177 N/A Maintenance garage employees Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Storage and Handling of LP Gases 110 N/A
All personnel who perform
installation, removal, operation or
maintenance Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary
Storage of Flammable and Combustible Liquids 106 N/A
Employees who handle, store, or
dispense these products Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Toxic and Hazardous Substances 1000 N/A
Employees that are exposed at or above the
limits for air contaminant listed in Table Z-
1*. Call EHS&RM for monitoring Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Trenching N/A
Employees who work in
excavations Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary
Tuberculosis
OSHA Draft
Standard 10/1997 N/A
All employees at risk i.e. medical,
fire, and police personnel, some
maintenance staff Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Violence in the Workplace (recommended)
General Duty
Clause N/A Any Initial 1 Update as necessary
Welding 253 N/A
All employees who perform
welding /cutting operations Initial / Periodic 1 Update as necessary Yellow indicates training that is mandatory for all employees. For training ideas or materials, contact IIPP administrator.

The term periodic training generally means training that occurs at regular intervals (e.g. 1 to 3 years). Annual refresher training is recommended in order to maintain the understanding/skill level required by most performance-based standards. The estimated times needed to provide training for each course, type of activity or exposure is the amount of time needed for the employee to obtain a minimum level of proficiency. More or less time may be needed depending on class size and the experience level of attendees. All training must be documented. 395
IIPP / Code of Safe Practices ( Rev. 2025 by DEARK E&C INC. ) 1 D
EARK E&C INC .

Code of Safe Practices
It is our policy that everythi ng possible will be done to protect emp loyees, custo mers and visitors from accidents. Safety is a cooperative undertaking requiring participat ion by every employ ee.

Failure by any emp loyee to comply with safe ty rules will be groun ds for corr ective discipline .

Supervisors shall insi st that e mployees observe all app licable Company, State, and Federal safe ty rules and practices and take act ion as is necessa ry to obtain compliance.

To carry out this policy, emp loyees SHALL:

1. Report unsafe conditions/equipment to su pervisor or safe ty coordina tor.

2. Report accident s, injuries and illnesses to your supervisor or safety coordina tor.

3. Persons known to be under the influence of into xicating liquor or drugs shall not b e permitted to be on the job.

4. Horseplay and other acts that have an adver se influence on the safety or well being of other employees are strictly prohibi ted.

5. Mea ns of egress shall never be blocked, shall be well lighted a nd unlocked during work ing hours.

6. In t he event of fire, sound the nearest alarm a nd evacuate the building.

7. Upon hearing the alarm bell, i mmediately evacuate the building and ga ther at the designated locatio n. Remain there until the " ALL CLE AR " signal is give n.

8. ONLY trained workers may a ttempt to respond to a fire or other emergency.

9. All e xit doors shall comply wi th fire safety regulations during business hour s.

10. There shall be no stora ge of a ny type permi tted in exit aisle s, corridors, stairs, doorway s and shall not block emergency equipme nt of any type.

11. All work areas shall be maintained in a safe, clean, neat and orderly manner.

12. All spills shall be cleaned up promp tly.

13. Always utili ze proper lifting t echniques. Never a ttempt to lift or push an object that is too heavy for you. Contact your supervisor when help is n ecessary. 396
IIPP / Code of Safe Practices ( Rev. 2025 by DEARK E&C INC. ) 2

14. Never stack material on top of locker s, file cabinets or o ther high place s. Do not store an y material in an un stable manner.

15. Report frayed electrical cords or exposed wiring to your supervisor i mmediately.

16. Never use a metal ladder when working on or near el ectrical components a nd systems.

17. Do not use electrical tools or equipme nt that is not pro perly grou nded.

18. All electrical equipme nt and app liances shall be plugged into appropria te wall r eceptacles or approved extens ion cord sized f or capacity. T hree pronged plugs shall be used to ensure continuity of grou nd.

19. All electrical cords i nstalled in or across tra ffic areas shall be installed in approp riate rubber protectors to preve nt electrical shock, trip hazards and allow wheelchair acces s.

20. Do not use compressed air for cleaning off clo thing.

21. Do not store compre ssed gas cylinders i n areas that are exposed to extreme heat source s, electric arcs or high t emperature l ines. All cylinders shall be chained in an upright posi tion to prevent falling or tippi ng over.

22. All pipelines shall be identified and approp riately la beled as to their con tents.

23. Hearing protect ion shall be worn in all areas identified as havi ng high noi se expos ure.

24. Goggles or face shields shall be worn when performing grinding opera tions.

25. Report all faulty or excessively worn hand tools to your supervisor. Do not use.

26. Do not enter con fined spaces unless tests for toxic sub stances a nd oxygen deficiency have been provided.

27. Always k eep flammable or toxic chemicals in c losed containers when not in use. Store in approved flammable storage cabine ts.

28. Consuming food in areas where hazardo us chemicals are present is pro hibited.

29. Poisonous solutions not inten ded for consu mption shall be appropriately labeled and stored.

30. A written Lock-out-Tag-out program mu st be comp lied with at all times. 397
IIPP / Code of Safe Practices ( Rev. 2025 by DEARK E&C INC. ) 3 General – Code of Safe Practices Acknowledgement
I, , have read and fully understand my responsibility to strongly adhere to all safety practices outlined in the “Code of Safe Practices”. I understand that at any time I violate any of these safe practices, disciplinary action may follow. I have received a copy and have fully discussed this outline with my immediate Supervisor.
_ _ _
Signed Date
Supervisor ___ _
Signature / Printed Name Date
398

u
u

TAILGATE TRAINING SIGN-IN

u Training Date uJobsite Location Name
u Training Time Spent uLocation Address
u Training Topic(s)
u Training Done By Signature
Trainer’s Position
u Actions to Do
Names of workers attending
Print Name Signature

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

k
399

u Names of workers attending (continued from front side) Print Name Signature

7. 8.

9. 10.

11. 12.

13. 14.

15. 16.

17. 18.

19. 20.

21. 22.
400

u
u
u
u
TAILGATE TOPIC:

Things to do before giving this tailgate training

Introduction
Show the Video (if there is one)

QUESTIONS TO ASK

1. 2.

3. 401

c
c
c
c
c

TAILGATE TEMPLATE
k Key training points

c
c
AFTER THE TRAINING, EMPLOYER ACTIONS TO TAKE:

1. 2.

3. AFTER THE TRAINING, SAFE WORK PRACTICES THAT WORKERS CAN DO:

1. 2.

3. 402
Item No. Section Description Unit of Measure Quantity Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Median Item Price Average Item Price Average % of Total Bid Price 1 Base Bid Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total base bid price) LS 1 $50,000.00 3.4% $180,878.73 10.8% $28,673.00 1.7% $100,000.00 5.3% $65,000.00 3.3% $96,440.00 4.8% $325,000.00 14.9% $55,000.00 2.4% $218,107.92 9.2% $250,000.00 10.1% $33,800.00 1.4% $27,850.00 1.1% $314,000.00 11.5% $96,440.00 $134,211.51 6.2% 2 Base Bid General Conditions LS 1 $50,000.00 3.4% $180,878.73 10.8% $228,231.00 13.7% $214,256.00 11.4% $98,000.00 5.0% $81,140.00 4.1% $80,000.00 3.7% $346,800.00 15.4% $26,720.31 1.1% $100,000.00 4.1% $227,700.00 9.2% $33,000.00 1.3% $150,000.00 5.5% $100,000.00 $139,748.16 6.8% 3 Base Bid Demolition LS 1 $45,000.00 3.1% $90,816.21 5.4% $59,360.00 3.6% $90,768.00 4.8% $107,182.00 5.4% $47,000.00 2.4% $115,000.00 5.3% $61,600.00 2.7% $129,744.56 5.5% $183,210.00 7.4% $250,200.00 10.1% $132,000.00 5.1% $275,000.00 10.1% $107,182.00 $122,067.75 5.5% 4 Base Bid Concrete/Minor Structural/Misc. Metals LS 1 $39,000.00 2.7% $37,005.59 2.2% $94,767.00 5.7% $174,959.00 9.3% $94,135.00 4.8% $39,370.00 2.0% $85,000.00 3.9% $187,862.40 8.3% $91,161.20 3.8% $62,075.00 2.5% $64,800.00 2.6% $181,500.00 7.0% $50,000.00 1.8% $85,000.00 $92,433.48 4.4% 5 Base Bid Rough Carpentry/Framing LS 1 $92,000.00 6.3% $68,508.07 4.1% $85,430.00 5.1% $69,138.00 3.7% $123,200.00 6.2% $89,450.00 4.5% $115,000.00 5.3% $101,624.60 4.5% $147,128.62 6.2% $239,850.00 9.7% $241,200.00 9.7% $165,000.00 6.4% $160,000.00 5.9% $115,000.00 $130,579.18 6.0% 6 Base Bid Gypsum Board/Plaster/ACT/Insulation LS 1 $63,000.00 4.3% $76,976.12 4.6% $167,586.00 10.0% $121,071.00 6.5% $130,000.00 6.6% $184,580.00 9.2% $125,000.00 5.7% $171,215.00 7.6% $242,484.61 10.2% $157,380.00 6.4% $228,300.00 9.2% $275,000.00 10.7% $145,000.00 5.3% $157,380.00 $160,584.06 7.4% 7 Base Bid Openings/Doors/Frames/Hardware LS 1 $66,000.00 4.6% $60,365.72 3.6% $63,600.00 3.8% $62,112.00 3.3% $70,000.00 3.5% $125,510.00 6.3% $65,000.00 3.0% $121,000.00 5.4% $85,036.09 3.6% $128,050.00 5.2% $121,200.00 4.9% $192,500.00 7.5% $48,000.00 1.8% $70,000.00 $92,951.83 4.3% 8 Base Bid Glazing LS 1 $12,000.00 0.8% $33,692.50 2.0% $40,439.00 2.4% $33,726.00 1.8% $62,000.00 3.1% $46,700.00 2.3% $65,000.00 3.0% $57,123.00 2.5% $40,524.58 1.7% $58,500.00 2.4% $34,800.00 1.4% $44,000.00 1.7% $40,000.00 1.5% $40,524.58 $43,731.16 2.1% 9 Base Bid Flooring LS 1 $147,000.00 10.1% $160,714.33 9.6% $106,054.00 6.3% $103,539.00 5.5% $130,708.00 6.6% $159,210.00 8.0% $65,000.00 3.0% $142,885.60 6.3% $31,299.48 1.3% $134,550.00 5.5% $68,300.00 2.7% $86,250.00 3.3% $55,000.00 2.0% $106,054.00 $106,962.34 5.4% 10 Base Bid Painting/Coatings LS 1 $31,000.00 2.1% $29,200.16 1.7% $47,345.00 2.8% $29,997.00 1.6% $62,500.00 3.2% $40,670.00 2.0% $65,000.00 3.0% $24,915.00 1.1% $131,772.77 5.5% $81,575.00 3.3% $93,400.00 3.8% $192,500.00 7.5% $94,000.00 3.4% $62,500.00 $71,067.30 3.2% 11 Base Bid Specialties/Toilet Accessories/Signage LS 1 $30,000.00 2.1% $34,905.43 2.1% $73,564.00 4.4% $108,362.00 5.8% $75,990.00 3.8% $69,360.00 3.5% $30,000.00 1.4% $52,816.50 2.3% $210,938.92 8.9% $40,430.00 1.6% $84,900.00 3.4% $33,000.00 1.3% $38,000.00 1.4% $52,816.50 $67,866.68 3.2% 12 Base Bid Finish Carpentry/Casework/Counters LS 1 $133,000.00 9.2% $112,209.49 6.7% $105,907.00 6.3% $88,009.00 4.7% $140,000.00 7.1% $193,310.00 9.7% $115,000.00 5.3% $168,447.50 7.5% $130,469.39 5.5% $116,640.00 4.7% $166,800.00 6.7% $115,000.00 4.5% $265,000.00 9.7% $130,469.39 $142,291.72 6.7% 13 Base Bid Plumbing LS 1 $170,000.00 11.7% $174,077.89 10.4% $159,000.00 9.5% $158,795.00 8.5% $175,500.00 8.9% $159,600.00 8.0% $250,000.00 11.4% $225,847.60 10.0% $178,496.43 7.5% $286,390.00 11.6% $191,000.00 7.7% $218,500.00 8.5% $180,000.00 6.6% $178,496.43 $194,400.53 9.3% 14 Base Bid HVAC/Controls/Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing LS 1 $203,000.00 14.0% $128,018.01 7.7% $131,440.00 7.9% $183,679.00 9.8% $145,250.00 7.3% $125,030.00 6.3% $135,000.00 6.2% $125,386.80 5.6% $103,024.69 4.3% $169,000.00 6.9% $148,600.00 6.0% $224,150.00 8.7% $450,000.00 16.5% $145,250.00 $174,736.81 8.2% 15 Base Bid Fire Alarm/Low Voltage/Communications LS 1 $47,000.00 3.2% $69,619.36 4.2% $12,720.00 0.8% $63,053.00 3.4% $102,984.00 5.2% $35,030.00 1.8% $85,000.00 3.9% $86,670.10 3.8% $143,384.54 6.0% $86,000.00 3.5% $115,000.00 4.6% $92,000.00 3.6% $85,000.00 3.1% $85,000.00 $78,727.77 3.6% 16 Base Bid Electrical/Lighting/Power LS 1 $169,000.00 11.7% $167,900.94 10.1% $206,700.00 12.4% $131,148.00 7.0% $280,450.00 14.2% $253,450.00 12.7% $220,000.00 10.1% $231,866.80 10.3% $325,751.76 13.7% $214,175.00 8.7% $255,000.00 10.3% $230,000.00 8.9% $200,000.00 7.3% $220,000.00 $221,957.12 10.6% 17 Base Bid Testing/Inspection Support/Commissioning LS 1 $13,000.00 0.9% $5,615.42 0.3% $1.00 0.0% $15,000.00 0.8% $15,000.00 0.8% $37,470.00 1.9% $20,000.00 0.9% $38,500.00 1.7% $39,536.18 1.7% $5,000.00 0.2% $27,200.00 1.1% $16,500.00 0.6% $15,000.00 0.5% $15,000.00 $19,063.28 0.9% 18 Base Bid Exterior/Patio Improvements LS 1 $38,000.00 2.6% $26,657.50 1.6% $23,850.00 1.4% $63,113.00 3.4% $42,000.00 2.1% $148,380.00 7.4% $165,000.00 7.6% $10,000.00 0.4% $34,264.69 1.4% $41,492.00 1.7% $64,000.00 2.6% $230,000.00 8.9% $144,000.00 5.3% $42,000.00 $79,289.01 3.6% 19 Base Bid Hazardous Material/Abatement/AQMD LS 1 $20,000.00 1.4% $15,140.28 0.9% $14,670.00 0.9% $15,514.00 0.8% $25,000.00 1.3% $25,790.00 1.3% $20,000.00 0.9% $15,224.00 0.7% $34,264.69 1.4% $78,000.00 3.2% $22,000.00 0.9% $17,250.00 0.7% $15,000.00 0.5% $20,000.00 $24,450.23 1.1% 20 Base Bid Fire Sprinklers LS 1 $32,000.00 2.2% $16,846.25 1.0% $21,200.00 1.3% $48,498.00 2.6% $32,000.00 1.6% $40,870.00 2.0% $40,000.00 1.8% $26,658.50 1.2% $31,938.64 1.3% $32,500.00 1.3% $48,800.00 2.0% $69,000.00 2.7% $10,000.00 0.4% $32,000.00 $34,639.34 1.6% Total Bid Price: $1,450,000.00 $1,670,026.73 $1,670,537.00 $1,874,737.00 $1,976,899.00 $1,998,360.00 $2,185,000.00 $2,251,443.40 $2,376,050.07 $2,464,817.00 $2,487,000.00 $2,575,000.00 $2,733,000.00 $2,185,000.00 $2,131,759.25 Tovey/Shultz Construction, Inc.

Bid Results Breakdown
Murrieta Fire & Rescue Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project MSD Project No. 26-001, CIP No. 21037
Bids Opened: April 28, 2026 @ 2:00 p.m.

DEARK E&C, INC Bid Review R.C. Construction Services SWCS Inc Blackstone Builders Inc. Coelho Inc R. Dependable Construction Inc. Caliba Inc. M. Brey, Inc MLC Constructors, Inc. AA Modern General Contractors Inc. First Trade Leonida Builders Inc 403
Item No. Section Description Unit of Measure Quantity Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost 1 Base Bid Mobilization (not to exceed 15% of total base bid price) LS 1 $50,000.00 3.4% $180,878.73 10.8% $28,673.00 1.7% $100,000.00 2 Base Bid General Conditions LS 1 $50,000.00 3.4% $180,878.73 10.8% $228,231.00 13.7% $214,256.00 3 Base Bid Demolition LS 1 $45,000.00 3.1% $90,816.21 5.4% $59,360.00 3.6% $90,768.00 4 Base Bid Concrete/Minor Structural/Misc. Metals LS 1 $39,000.00 2.7% $37,005.59 2.2% $94,767.00 5.7% $174,959.00 5 Base Bid Rough Carpentry/Framing LS 1 $92,000.00 6.3% $68,508.07 4.1% $85,430.00 5.1% $69,138.00 6 Base Bid Gypsum Board/Plaster/ACT/Insulation LS 1 $63,000.00 4.3% $76,976.12 4.6% $167,586.00 10.0% $121,071.00 7 Base Bid Openings/Doors/Frames/Hardware LS 1 $66,000.00 4.6% $60,365.72 3.6% $63,600.00 3.8% $62,112.00 8 Base Bid Glazing LS 1 $12,000.00 0.8% $33,692.50 2.0% $40,439.00 2.4% $33,726.00 9 Base Bid Flooring LS 1 $147,000.00 10.1% $160,714.33 9.6% $106,054.00 6.3% $103,539.00 10 Base Bid Painting/Coatings LS 1 $31,000.00 2.1% $29,200.16 1.7% $47,345.00 2.8% $29,997.00 11 Base Bid Specialties/Toilet Accessories/Signage LS 1 $30,000.00 2.1% $34,905.43 2.1% $73,564.00 4.4% $108,362.00 12 Base Bid Finish Carpentry/Casework/Counters LS 1 $133,000.00 9.2% $112,209.49 6.7% $105,907.00 6.3% $88,009.00 13 Base Bid Plumbing LS 1 $170,000.00 11.7% $174,077.89 10.4% $159,000.00 9.5% $158,795.00 14 Base Bid HVAC/Controls/Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing LS 1 $203,000.00 14.0% $128,018.01 7.7% $131,440.00 7.9% $183,679.00 15 Base Bid Fire Alarm/Low Voltage/Communications LS 1 $47,000.00 3.2% $69,619.36 4.2% $12,720.00 0.8% $63,053.00 16 Base Bid Electrical/Lighting/Power LS 1 $169,000.00 11.7% $167,900.94 10.1% $206,700.00 12.4% $131,148.00 17 Base Bid Testing/Inspection Support/Commissioning LS 1 $13,000.00 0.9% $5,615.42 0.3% $1.00 0.0% $15,000.00 18 Base Bid Exterior/Patio Improvements LS 1 $38,000.00 2.6% $26,657.50 1.6% $23,850.00 1.4% $63,113.00 19 Base Bid Hazardous Material/Abatement/AQMD LS 1 $20,000.00 1.4% $15,140.28 0.9% $14,670.00 0.9% $15,514.00 20 Base Bid Fire Sprinklers LS 1 $32,000.00 2.2% $16,846.25 1.0% $21,200.00 1.3% $48,498.00 Total Bid Price: $1,450,000.00 $1,670,026.73 $1,670,537.00 $1,874,737.00 Tovey/Shultz Construction, Inc.

Bid Results Breakdown
Murrieta Fire & Rescue Station 1 Living Quarters Improvement Project MSD Project No. 26-001, CIP No. 21037
Bids Opened: April 28, 2026 @ 2:00 p.m.

DEARK E&C, INC R.C. Construction Services SWCS Inc
(Zoomed In Version)
404
% of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price

5.3% $65,000.00 3.3% $96,440.00 4.8% $325,000.00 14.9% $55,000.00 2.4% $218,107.92 9.2% $250,000.00 10.1%

11.4% $98,000.00 5.0% $81,140.00 4.1% $80,000.00 3.7% $346,800.00 15.4% $26,720.31 1.1% $100,000.00 4.1%

4.8% $107,182.00 5.4% $47,000.00 2.4% $115,000.00 5.3% $61,600.00 2.7% $129,744.56 5.5% $183,210.00 7.4%

9.3% $94,135.00 4.8% $39,370.00 2.0% $85,000.00 3.9% $187,862.40 8.3% $91,161.20 3.8% $62,075.00 2.5%

3.7% $123,200.00 6.2% $89,450.00 4.5% $115,000.00 5.3% $101,624.60 4.5% $147,128.62 6.2% $239,850.00 9.7%

6.5% $130,000.00 6.6% $184,580.00 9.2% $125,000.00 5.7% $171,215.00 7.6% $242,484.61 10.2% $157,380.00 6.4%

3.3% $70,000.00 3.5% $125,510.00 6.3% $65,000.00 3.0% $121,000.00 5.4% $85,036.09 3.6% $128,050.00 5.2%

1.8% $62,000.00 3.1% $46,700.00 2.3% $65,000.00 3.0% $57,123.00 2.5% $40,524.58 1.7% $58,500.00 2.4%

5.5% $130,708.00 6.6% $159,210.00 8.0% $65,000.00 3.0% $142,885.60 6.3% $31,299.48 1.3% $134,550.00 5.5%

1.6% $62,500.00 3.2% $40,670.00 2.0% $65,000.00 3.0% $24,915.00 1.1% $131,772.77 5.5% $81,575.00 3.3%

5.8% $75,990.00 3.8% $69,360.00 3.5% $30,000.00 1.4% $52,816.50 2.3% $210,938.92 8.9% $40,430.00 1.6%

4.7% $140,000.00 7.1% $193,310.00 9.7% $115,000.00 5.3% $168,447.50 7.5% $130,469.39 5.5% $116,640.00 4.7%

8.5% $175,500.00 8.9% $159,600.00 8.0% $250,000.00 11.4% $225,847.60 10.0% $178,496.43 7.5% $286,390.00 11.6%

9.8% $145,250.00 7.3% $125,030.00 6.3% $135,000.00 6.2% $125,386.80 5.6% $103,024.69 4.3% $169,000.00 6.9%

3.4% $102,984.00 5.2% $35,030.00 1.8% $85,000.00 3.9% $86,670.10 3.8% $143,384.54 6.0% $86,000.00 3.5%

7.0% $280,450.00 14.2% $253,450.00 12.7% $220,000.00 10.1% $231,866.80 10.3% $325,751.76 13.7% $214,175.00 8.7%

0.8% $15,000.00 0.8% $37,470.00 1.9% $20,000.00 0.9% $38,500.00 1.7% $39,536.18 1.7% $5,000.00 0.2%

3.4% $42,000.00 2.1% $148,380.00 7.4% $165,000.00 7.6% $10,000.00 0.4% $34,264.69 1.4% $41,492.00 1.7%

0.8% $25,000.00 1.3% $25,790.00 1.3% $20,000.00 0.9% $15,224.00 0.7% $34,264.69 1.4% $78,000.00 3.2%

2.6% $32,000.00 1.6% $40,870.00 2.0% $40,000.00 1.8% $26,658.50 1.2% $31,938.64 1.3% $32,500.00 1.3% $1,976,899.00 $1,998,360.00 $2,185,000.00 $2,251,443.40 $2,376,050.07 $2,464,817.00 SWCS Inc Blackstone Builders Inc. Coelho Inc R. Dependable Construction Inc. Caliba Inc. M. Brey, Inc MLC Constructors, Inc. 405
Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Item Cost % of Total Bid Price Median Item Price Average Item Price Average % of Total Bid Price $33,800.00 1.4% $27,850.00 1.1% $314,000.00 11.5% $96,440.00 $134,211.51 6.2% $227,700.00 9.2% $33,000.00 1.3% $150,000.00 5.5% $100,000.00 $139,748.16 6.8% $250,200.00 10.1% $132,000.00 5.1% $275,000.00 10.1% $107,182.00 $122,067.75 5.5% $64,800.00 2.6% $181,500.00 7.0% $50,000.00 1.8% $85,000.00 $92,433.48 4.4% $241,200.00 9.7% $165,000.00 6.4% $160,000.00 5.9% $115,000.00 $130,579.18 6.0% $228,300.00 9.2% $275,000.00 10.7% $145,000.00 5.3% $157,380.00 $160,584.06 7.4% $121,200.00 4.9% $192,500.00 7.5% $48,000.00 1.8% $70,000.00 $92,951.83 4.3% $34,800.00 1.4% $44,000.00 1.7% $40,000.00 1.5% $40,524.58 $43,731.16 2.1% $68,300.00 2.7% $86,250.00 3.3% $55,000.00 2.0% $106,054.00 $106,962.34 5.4% $93,400.00 3.8% $192,500.00 7.5% $94,000.00 3.4% $62,500.00 $71,067.30 3.2% $84,900.00 3.4% $33,000.00 1.3% $38,000.00 1.4% $52,816.50 $67,866.68 3.2% $166,800.00 6.7% $115,000.00 4.5% $265,000.00 9.7% $130,469.39 $142,291.72 6.7% $191,000.00 7.7% $218,500.00 8.5% $180,000.00 6.6% $178,496.43 $194,400.53 9.3% $148,600.00 6.0% $224,150.00 8.7% $450,000.00 16.5% $145,250.00 $174,736.81 8.2% $115,000.00 4.6% $92,000.00 3.6% $85,000.00 3.1% $85,000.00 $78,727.77 3.6% $255,000.00 10.3% $230,000.00 8.9% $200,000.00 7.3% $220,000.00 $221,957.12 10.6% $27,200.00 1.1% $16,500.00 0.6% $15,000.00 0.5% $15,000.00 $19,063.28 0.9% $64,000.00 2.6% $230,000.00 8.9% $144,000.00 5.3% $42,000.00 $79,289.01 3.6% $22,000.00 0.9% $17,250.00 0.7% $15,000.00 0.5% $20,000.00 $24,450.23 1.1% $48,800.00 2.0% $69,000.00 2.7% $10,000.00 0.4% $32,000.00 $34,639.34 1.6% $2,487,000.00 $2,575,000.00 $2,733,000.00 $2,185,000.00 $2,131,759.25 Bid Review AA Modern General Contractors Inc. First Trade Leonida Builders Inc 406
B ST

JUNIPER ST

PLUM AVE
Fire Station No.1
41825 Juniper Street 8/23/2022
CIP 21019Vicinity Map
100 0 10050 Feet
E

LOCATION MAP
^_
G:\GISData\Departments\Engineering\ArcMapDocs_22\Vicinity2022..mxd 10/1/25
21037
407

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 8.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Bob Moehling, Public Works Director
PREPARED BY: Garrett Strang, Capital Projects Program Manager SUBJECT:

Notice of Completion of Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Projects, CIP No. 13044 and CIP No. 13046

ABSTRACT
Staff deems construction of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022/23 Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) No. 13044, and the FY 2023/24 Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, CIP No. 13046, to be substantially complete and recommends accepting the improvements and having the City Clerk record a Notice of Completion (NOC).

RECOMMENDATION
Accept the improvements for the FY 2022/23 Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, CIP No. 13044, and the FY 2023/24 Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, CIP No. 13046, as complete; Authorize the City Clerk to record a Notice of Completion and release bonds in accordance with State law and City Ordinances; and
Release any remaining retention from CIP No. 13044 and CIP No. 13046 in accordance with State law and City ordinances.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On December 7, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution No. 21-4502, authorizing the allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds for FY 2022/23, which included the funding of Pedestrian Safety Enhancements Project FY 2022/23, CIP No. 13044, and authorized the City Manager to execute the required supplemental agreements with the County of Riverside.

On November 15, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 22-4626, authorizing the allocation of Community Development Block Grant funds for FY 2023/24, which included the funding of Pedestrian Safety Enhancements Project FY 2023/24, CIP No. 13046 and authorized the City Manager to execute the required supplemental agreements with the County of Riverside.

On June 3, 2025, the City Council approved Resolution No. 25-4836, approving the Capital Improvement Plan Budget for FY 2025/26, and the FY 2025/26 to 2029/30 Capital Improvement Plan, which included the CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
408
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 8.

Budget for FY 2025/26, and the FY 2025/26 to 2029/30 Capital Improvement Plan, which included the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Projects CIP No. 13044 and CIP No. 13046.

On April 1, 2025, the City Council awarded the construction contract for the FY 2022/23 Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, CIP No. 13044, and the FY 2023/24 Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Project, CIP No. 13046, to LC Paving & Sealing, Inc., in the amount of $907,067.75.

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
The City Council’s goal of planning, programming and creating infrastructure development is associated with this Tier 1 project.

DISCUSSION
Construction began on May 27, 2025, and was deemed substantially complete on September 25, 2025. The project consisted of the installation of pedestrian curb ramps, sidewalks, and crosswalk striping at various intersections to improve access for disabled persons under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The Project is funded utilizing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Gas Tax funds. CDBG funds are federally funded through the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and are administered by the County of Riverside Department of Housing Workforce Solutions (HWS). The project included improvements at the following intersections:

1. Clinton Keith Road and Chantory/Bear Creek South

2. Clinton Keith Road and Calle Del Oso Oro/Bear Creek North

3. Clinton Keith Road and Club View Drive

4. Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Whitewood Road

5. Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Via Princesa West/Villa Drive

6. Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Margarita Road

7. Whitewood Road and Rockcrest Drive

8. Whitewood Road and Carolwood Court

9. Poinsettia Street and Nasturtium Lane

10. Poinsettia Street and Gladiolus Avenue

11. St. Raphael Drive and Dartanian Place

12. Carlton Oaks Street and Crosswalk (near Redbud Lane)

13. Carlton Oaks Street and Murrieta Oaks Avenue
Final payment, other than retention, has been made to the contractor, and the project was successfully completed within the original contract value. Staff has inspected the improvements and found them to be satisfactory.

PUBLIC NOTICING
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

CEQA AND REGULATORY OVERVIEW
This project is recommended for exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines because this project consists of operations and repairs to existing CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
409
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 8.
facilities with no expanded use.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total construction cost of $896,251.99, is within the original contract value of $907,067.75. The anticipated overall total project costs, including permits, design, administration, inspection, and construction, are approximately $966,727.31. Funding was provided from CDBG funds in CIP Nos. 13044 and 13046.

Any unspent project funds remaining after completion of the Capital Improvement Project shall revert to the respective funds’available balance. Finance staff will prepare the required budget and accounting entry to reflect the updated fund balance.

ATTACHMENTS
ATT 1 - Notice of Completion
ATT 2 - Vicinity Map
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
410
411
215
ELM ST
M
C
E
L
W
A
I
N
R
D

GUAVA ST
N
U

T M E G
S
T

HAYES AVE LEMON ST

JUNIPER ST
M
A
R
G
A
R
I
T
A
R
D
ELM ST
FIG ST
V
I
A
P
R
I N

C E S A

L I N N E L L N

GUAVA ST

KELLER RD
L
I
N
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
A
L
T
A
M
U
R
R
I E
T
A
D
R

VINEYARD PKY

JUNIPER ST

MAGNOLIA ST

MONROE AVE
J
A
C
K
S
O
N
A
V
E
IVY ST

HAYES AVE
L
A
S
B
R
I S
A
S R
D
M
O
N
R
O
E
A V E
J
A
C
K
S
O
N
A
V
E
C
A

L L E D E L O
S
O
O
R
O
C
L
I
N
T
O
N
K
E
I
T
H
R
D
N
U
T
M
E
G
S
T

KALMIA ST
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
O
A
K
S
R
D
H
A
N
C
O
C
K
A
V
E

ANTELOPE RD

MADISON AVE
M
U

R R I E T A H O
T

S P R I N G S R D

ADAMS AVE

C L I N T O N K E I T H R D
L
O
S
A
L
A
M
O
S
R
D

WASHINGTON AVE

J E F F E
R
S
O
N
A
V
E
W
H
I
T
E
W
O
O
D
R
D
Overview Map
F
Pedestrian Safety Enhancements Project
(CIP No. 13044 and 13046) 02/26/25
Attachment
0 1.50.75
Miles Vicinity Map
412

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 9.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Bob Moehling, Public Works Director
PREPARED BY: Anita Agyeman, Management Analyst - Public Works SUBJECT:

Agreement for Consulting Services for the Storm Drain Master Plan, CIP No. 19002

ABSTRACT
This item approves an Agreement for Professional Services (Agreement) for the preparation of the Storm Drain Master Plan, CIP No. 19002 (Project). The Project will evaluate the City’sexisting storm drain system, identify deficiencies, and develop a prioritized Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project list to address current and future drainage needs. The Project is partially funded through existing CIP appropriations, with additional funding subject to City Council approval if services are authorized. The Storm Drain Master Plan will provide a comprehensive framework to guide long-term infrastructure planning, improve system performance, and enhance flood protection throughout the City.

RECOMMENDATION
Amend the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 Capital Improvement Plan Budget to establish an additional appropriation of $511,000 of Storm Drain Development Impact Fees (DIF) into CIP Project No. 19002; Approve the Agreement for Professional Services to develop a Storm Drain Master Plan, CIP No. 19002, with Rick Engineering Company, Inc., in the amount of $564,600; Authorize a 10% contingency of $56,400; and
Authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement, not-to-exceed 10% of the contract amount.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On June 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-4836, approving the Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2025/26 to 2029/30, which included the Storm Drain Master Plan, CIP No. 19002 (Vote: 5-0).

On February 26, 2026, the City Council held a workshop to conduct a comprehensive review of the City’stop priorities. The development of the Storm Drain Master Plan, CIP No. 19002, was upgraded to a Tier 1 Small Scale Project from Tier 2 on Agenda Item No. WS1.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
413
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 9.

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
This item aligns with the City Council goal of: planning, programming and creating infrastructure development relating to priority Tier 1.

DISCUSSION
Development of a Storm Drain Master Plan consists of preparing a comprehensive, citywide planning document to evaluate, model, and improve the City’sstorm drain infrastructure system. The Project includes assessing existing drainage facilities, identifying deficiencies, and developing prioritized CIP project lists to address current and future drainage needs throughout the City of Murrieta (City).

The Project encompasses all major drainage systems within the City, including storm drainpipes, culverts, channels, inlets, manholes, and related facilities that are part of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4). The majority of the City is located within the Santa Margarita River Watershed, with drainage conveyed through facilities such as Murrieta Creek, Warm Springs Creek, and various local drainage lines identified in Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD) master drainage plan for Murrieta Creek.

The Project proposes to develop a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based inventory of existing drainage infrastructure and to perform hydrologic and hydraulic modeling to evaluate system performance under various storm events. The analysis will identify undersized or deficient facilities, flood-prone areas, and gaps in the existing drainage network. Based on this analysis, the Project will provide recommendations for repairs, upgrades, and new storm drain facilities, along with prioritization and planning-level cost estimates for implementation.

The Project will also evaluate future conditions, including projected development and land use changes, to ensure the storm drain system can accommodate long-term growth. The final Storm Drain Master Plan will include a prioritized CIP project list, identifying projects for near-term (5-year) and long-term (20-year) implementation, as well as potential funding sources, including local, state, and federal programs.

On October 15, 2025, the City issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for professional engineering services to prepare the Storm Drain Master Plan. The City received eleven statements of qualifications (SOQ) from qualified consultants. A short list was established of the three best-qualified firms, and interviews were held.

Rick Engineering Company (REC) was selected by the City’s panel. REC is highly experienced in the preparation of storm drain master plans for agencies throughout Southern California. Work is expected to commence in July 2026 and has an estimated project duration of 22 months.

Staff reviewed REC’sproposal for preparation of the Storm Drain Master Plan and found it consistent with current market pricing for similar types of work. The cost of the plan is $495,000, with optional tasks increasing the total potential cost to $564,600. Staff recommends approving a 10% contingency in the event of minor additions that would be subject to approval by the City Manager for a total amount of $621,000.

The current budget for CIP No. 19002 is $250,000. The total Agreement amount, including contingency, is $621,000. Additional funding for this project is necessary to fund staff time associated with this project (instead of the General Fund), as well as the potential for additional specialty consulting services which may be needed to complete the Storm Drain Master Plan; the recommended amount for these items is $140,000. Combined, the total estimated cost for this project is $761,000. Therefore, an additional appropriation of $511,000 in Storm Drain Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds is needed for CIP No. 19002.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
414
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 9.

PUBLIC NOTICING
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

CEQA AND REGULATORY OVERVIEW
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because this action will not result in a physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total fiscal impact of approving the contract is $495,000, with optional tasks increasing the total potential cost to $564,600. Staff is recommending a 10% contingency, or $56,400, for a total of $621,000. In addition, staff recommends allocating another $140,000 to the CIP project budget to cover charging staff time to this project rather than the General Fund and to address any need for specialty consulting services related to completing the Storm Drain Master Plan. Combined, this makes the estimated total project cost $761,000.

The Project is currently funded in the amount of $250,000 from Fund 134, Storm Drain Development Impact Fee (DIF). An appropriation of $511,000 is necessary from Storm Drain DIF into CIP Project No. 19002.

If the City Council approves the agreement, staff recommends that City Council approve an amendment to the FY 2025/26 Capital Improvement Plan Budget to establish an additional appropriation of $511,000 of Storm Drain Development Impact Fees (DIF) into CIP Project No. 19002.

ATTACHMENTS
ATT 1 - Agreement with Rick Engineering Company, Inc.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
415
For City Clerk Use Only
Contract No._________

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WITH THE CITY OF MURRIETA (“CITY”)
Project Name/Description (“Project”): Storm Drain Master Plan Consultant Name (“Consultant”): Rick Engineering Company Consultant Business Type: Corporation
Consultant Address: 5620 Friars Road, San Diego, CA 92110 Consultant Representative Name and Title (“Consultant Representative”): Brendan Hastie, Vice President
Consultant Representative Work Phone and Email: (619) 204-5979, [email protected] Termination Date: May 1, 2028
Total Not-To-Exceed Contract Amount (“Contract Sum”): $564,600.00 City Department Contact (“Department Contact”): Jeff Hitch, City Engineer Department Contact Work Phone: (951) 461-6076
Department Contact Email: [email protected]
Is Federal Funding Being Used to Fund Any Part of The Project (Yes/No): No 416

RECITALS
The City desires to contract with a Consultant to provide professional services as more furth
er set forth herein.

The Ci
ty circulated a Request for Quotes or Proposals for the above-described professional services.

Consult
ant submitted a proposal to City to provide the above -described professional services.

City S
taff has reviewed all the proposals and after considering the demonstrated competence of Consultant, the professional qualifications of Consultant, and the fairness and reasonableness of Consultant’s proposed cost, staff has determined that an agreement to provide the required services should be awarded to Consultant.
417

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WITH THE CITY OF MURRIETA (“CITY”)
THI
S AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of the effective on the date executed by the City by and between CITY OF MURRIETA, a California municipal corporation (“ City”) and (“Consultant ”). City and Consultant may be referred to individually as “Party” or collectively as “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants made by the Parties and contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTI
CLE 1. SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide those services specified in the “ Scope of Services ” attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, which may be referred to herein as the “services ” or “ work” hereunder. As a material inducement to City entering into this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants: a) it has the qualifications, experience, and facilities necessary to properly perform the Services required under this Agreement b) all services set forth in the Scope of Services will be performed in a competent and satisfactory manner; c) all materials used for services will be both of good quality as well as fit for the purpose intended; and, d) Consultant shall follow the highest professional standards and practices in performing the services required hereunder.

1.2 Consultant’s Proposal. The Scope of Services shall include the scope of services or work included in Consultant’s proposal or bid, which shall be incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such proposal or bid, and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall govern. No other terms and conditions from Consultant’s proposal or bid, other than description of scope of services or work, shall apply to this Agreement, unless specifically agreed to by City in writing.

1.3 Compliance with Law. All services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules and regulations of City and any federal, State or local governmental agency having jurisdiction in effect at the time services are rendered. City, and its officers, employees and agents, shall not be liable at law or in equity for failure of Consultant to comply with this Section.

1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Consultant shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for Consultant’s performance of the services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties or interest levied, assessed or imposed against City hereunder. 418

1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents and warrants Consultant: a) has thoroughly investigated and considered services to be performed, b) has carefully considered how services should be performed, and c) fully understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of services under this Agreement.

1.6 Software and Computer Services. If the Scope of Services includes the provision and/or installation of any software, computer system, or other computer technology, Consultant represents and warrants that it is familiar with and/or has inspected City’s current infrastructure, equipment, computer system and software and that the software, computer system, or other computer technology provided and/or installed by Consultant under this Agreement is compatible, and shall be fully functional, with such infrastructure, equipment, computer system and software of City . Consultant acknowledges that City is relying on this representation by Consultant as a material consideration in entering into this Agreement.

1.7 Prevailing Wages. If services include any “public work” or “maintenance work,” as those terms are defined in California Labor Code section 1720 et seq. and California Code of Regulations, Title 8, s ection 16000 et seq. , and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant shall pay prevailing wages for such work and comply with the requirements in California Labor Code section 1770 et seq. and 1810 et seq., and all other applicable laws.

1.8 Contract Modifications. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, or any modifications or revisions to the standard terms and conditions herein are made a part hereof as set forth in the “Contract Modifications” attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of Exhibit B and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of Exhibit B shall govern.

ARTICLE 2. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT

2.1 Contract Sum. Subject to any limitations set forth in this Agreement, City agrees to pay Consultant the rates specified in the “Schedule of Compensation” attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and incorporated herein by this reference . The total compensation for all work, including reimbursement for actual expenses, shall not exceed the Contract Sum set forth above . Compensation may include reimbursement, for actual and necessary expenditures , if both are specified in the Schedule of Compensation, as well as approved by City in advance.

2.2 Invoices. Unless some other method of payment is specified in Exhibit C, Schedule of Compensation, in any month in which Consultant wishes to receive payment, no later than the first business day of such month, Consultant shall submit to City, in a form approved by City’s Finance Director, an invoice for services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. By submitting an invoice for payment under this 419
Agreement, Consultant is certifying compliance with all provisions of this Agreement. Except as provided in Sections 7.3, 7.4 and 7.5, City shall pay Consultant for all expenses stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement generally within thirty (30) days, and City will use its best efforts to make payment no later than forty- five (45) days, from the submission of an invoice in an approved form. In the event any charges or expenses are disputed by City, the original invoice shall be returned by City to Consultant for correction and resubmission. Review and payment by City for any invoice provided by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any rights or remedies provided herein or any applicable law. Each invoice is to include (unless otherwise specified by City) : 1) line items for all personnel describing the work performed, the number of hours worked, and the hourly rate; 2) line items for all materials and equipment properly charged to the Services; 3) line items for all other approved reimbursable expenses claimed, with supporting documentation; and 4) line items for all approved subcontractor labor, supplies, equipment, materials, and travel properly charged to the Services.

ARTICLE 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE

3.0 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement.

3.1 Term. The Agreement shall commence and become effective upon the date executed by the City and will continue until the Termination Date. This Agreement may be extended for up to two, additional one -year periods upon the mutual agreement in writing of both parties.

Unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 7 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until completion of any ongoing services, which shall be no later than the Termination Date set forth above.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Indemnification and Insurance provisions set forth in Article 5 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

3.2 Schedule of Performance. Consultant shall commence the services pursuant to this Agreement upon receipt of a written notice to proceed from City and shall perform all services within the time period(s) established in Exhibit A.

3.3 Force Majeure. The time period(s) specified in Exhibit A for performance of the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Consultant , including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, wars, litigation, and/or acts of any governmental agency, including City, if Consultant shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify City in writing of the causes of the delay.

City shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the services for the period of the enforced delay when and if in the judgment of City such delay is justified. City’s determination shall be final and conclusive upon the Parties to this Agreement. In no event shall Consultant be 420
entitled to recover damages against City for any delay in the performance of this Agreement, however caused, Consultant’s sole remedy being extension of this Agreement pursuant to this Section.

ARTICLE 4. COORDINATION OF WORK

4.1 Representative of Consultant. The Consultant Representative is authorized to act on Consultant’s behalf with respect to the work or services specified herein and to make all decisions in connection therewith. It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the representative was a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the representative may not be replaced nor may their responsibilities be substantially reduced by Consultant without the express written approval of City.

4.2 Department Contact for City . The Department Contact (or other person designated by the City Manager) shall be the primary person on behalf of City responsible for the administration of the Agreement. It shall be Consultant ’s responsibility to assure that the Department Contact is kept informed of both the progress of the performance of the services as well as any decisions which must be made by City.

4.3 Approvals from City. City approvals or actions, pursuant to the authority of this Agreement, are to be made (unless otherwise specified) either by the Department Contact, City Manager or by their delegate as provided for in writing.

4.4 Independent Co ntractor. Neither City , nor any of its officers, employees or agents, shall have any control over the manner or means by which Consultant , or its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, perform the services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. Consultant shall perform all services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain under only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it, or any of its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, are officers, employees or agents of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Consultant in its business or otherwise or a joint venturer or a member of any joint enterprise with Consultant.

Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. Consultant represents and warrants that the personnel used to provide services to City pursuant to this Agreement shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive control and direction.

No City employee benefits shall be available to Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, in connection with the performance of this Agreement.

City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant , its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. In the event that Consultant or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this 421
Agreement claims or is determined by a federal or state agency, a court of competent jurisdiction, or the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, to be classified as other than an independent contractor for City, then Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any and all assessed fines, penalties, judgments, employee and/or employer contributions, and any other damages and costs assessed to City as a consequence of, or in any way attributable to, the assertion that Consultant , or any officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor Consultant used to provide services under this Agreement, is/are employees of City.

4.5 Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of Consultant , its principals and employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, without express written approval of City, Consultant shall not contract with any other City to perform in whole or in part services required hereunder without express written approval of City, and neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred or assigned. No approved transfer shall release Consultant, or any surety or insured of Consultant, of any liability hereunder without express written consent of City.

ARTICLE 5. INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

5.1 Insurance Coverages. Prior to commencement of any services under this Agreement, and without limiting Consultant’s indemnification obligation to City, Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, in a form and content satisfactory to City, for the duration of the Agreement, primary policies of insurance of the type and amounts set forth in the “Insurance Requirements” attached hereto as Exhibit “D” and incorporated herein by this reference.

5.2 Indemnification.
(a) General Obligations. Except as set forth for Design Professionals below, Consultant agrees, to the full extent permitted by law, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officers, employees and agents (each an “Indemnitee” and collectively, “Indemnitees”) against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from, whether actual or threatened, any and all actions, either judicial, administrative, arbitration or regulatory claims, damages to persons or property, losses, costs, penalties, obligations, errors, omissions or liabilities (herein “Claims or Liabilities”) that may be asserted or claimed by any person, firm or City arising out of or in connection with the negligent performance of the work, operations or activities provided herein of Consultant, its officers, employees, agents, subcontractors, or invitees, or any individual or entity for which Consultant is legally liable (each an “ Indemnitor” and collectively, “Indemnitors”), or arising from Indemnitors’ reckless or willful misconduct, or arising from Indemnitors’ negligent performance of or failure to perform any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement, and in connection therewith:
1) Consultant will defend any action or actions filed or threatened in connection with any such Claims or Liabilities, or at option of Indemnitee(s) will reimburse and pay for all costs and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees, 422
incurred by Indemnitee(s) in connection therewith; and, 2) Consultant will promptly pay any judgment rendered against Indemnitee(s) for any such Claims or Liabilities, and will save and hold Indemnitee(s) harmless therefrom. (b) Further Provisions. The indemnity obligation herein shall be binding on successors, assigns and heirs of Consultant and shall survive termination of this Agreement. Consultant shall incorporate similar indemnity agreements as provided herein with its subcontractors, and if Consultant fails to do so Consultant shall be fully responsible to indemnify City hereunder therefor. Failure of City and/or City Parties (collectively “City” for solely this Section 5. 2(b)) to monitor compliance with any of the indemnification provisions herein shall not be a waiver hereof. The indemnification provisions herein do not apply to claims or liabilities occurring as a result of City’s sole negligence or willful misconduct, but, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall apply to claims and liabilities resulting in part from City’s negligence, except that design professionals’ indemnity hereunder shall be limited to claims and liabilities arising out of the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of the design professional. The indemnification provided herein includes Claims or Liabilities arising from any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services hereunder. Payment of invoices by City is not a condition precedent to enforcement of the indemnity obligation herein. In the event of any dispute between Consultant and City, as to whether liability arises from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, Consultant will be obligated to pay for City’s defense until such time as a final judgment has been entered adjudicating City as solely negligent or responsible for willful misconduct. Consultant will not be entitled in the absence of such a determination to any reimbursement of defense costs including but not limited to attorney’s fees, expert fees and costs of litigation. (c) Pursuant to the full language of California Civil Code §2782, and only if Consultant qualifies as a D esign Professional , Consultant agrees to indemnify, including the cost to defend, City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, or liability that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant and its employees or agents in the performance of services under this contract, but this indemnity does not apply to liability for damages arising from the sole negligence, active negligence, or willful acts of the City; and does not apply to any passive negligence of the City unless caused at least in part by the Consultant. The City agrees that in no event shall the cost to defend charged to the Consultant exceed Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

This duty to indemnify shall not be waived or modified by contractual agreement or acts of the parties.

5.3 Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Consultant’s services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Indemnitees against, and will hold and save them and each of them harmless from , whether actual or threatened, any and all Claims and Liabilities, consistent with all obligations provided for in this Section

5.3, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful 423
act, error or omission, or reckless or willful misconduct of Indemnitors in the performance of professional services under this Agreement.

ARTICLE 6. RECORDS, REPORTS AND RELEASE OF INFORMATION

6.1 Records. Consultant shall keep, and require subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports, studies or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and services performed hereunder (“books and records ”) as shall be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement and enable City to evaluate the performance of such services. Any and all such books and records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, shall be complete and detailed, and shall be readily a ccessible. City shall have full and free access to such books and records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit and make records and transcripts. Such books and records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the services hereunder. City shall have access to such books and records in the event any audit is required. Consultant shall fully cooperate with City in providing access to any and all Consultant records and documents if a public records request is made and disclosure is required by law including but not limited to the California Public Records Act.

6.2 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents and other materials (“documents and materials ”) prepared by Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors in the performance of this Agreement shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of City and/or upon the termination of this Agreement, and Consultant shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership, use, reuse, or assignment of the documents and materials hereunder. Consultant may retain copies of such documents and materials for its own use. Consultant shall have the right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any documents and materials prepared by them, and in the event Consultant fails to secure such assignment, Consultant shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. Moreover, with respect to any Consultant documents and materials that may qualify as “works made for hire” as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101, such documents and materials are hereby deemed “works made for hire” for City.

6.3 Confidentiality and Release of Information. All information gained or work product produced by Consultant in its performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential, unless such information is in the public domain or already known to Consultant. Consultant shall not release or disclose any such information or work product to persons or entities other than City without prior written authorization from City . Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not, without prior written authorization from City or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide documents, declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other 424
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered “voluntary” provided Consultant immediately gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. If Consultant, or any officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of Consultant, provides any information or work product in violation of this Agreement, then City shall have the right to reimbursement and indemnity from Consultant for any damages, costs and fees, including attorney’s fees, caused by or incurred as a result of Consultant’s conduct. As concerning, r egarding or related to, in any way, this Agreement and the work performed thereunder: a) Consultant shall immediately notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party; b) City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding; and, c) Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant , however, this right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

ARTICLE 7. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION

7.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed and governed both as to validity and to performance of the Parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Consultant agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. In the event of litigation in a U.S. District Court, venue shall lie exclusively in the Central District of California, in the County of Riverside, State of California.

7.2 Suspension, or Termination, Prior to Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement except as specifically provided in Section

7.4 for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate or suspend this Agreement, or any portion hereof, at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, upon ten (10) days’ notice to Consultant, except that where termination or suspension is due to the fault of Consultant, the period of notice may be such shorter time as determined by City . Upon receipt of any notice of termination or suspension, Consultant shall immediately cease all services hereunder , unless the notice provides otherwise, or except such as specifically approved by City . Upon submittal of an invoice consistent with Section 2. 2, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for all services rendered prior to the effective date of the notice of termination or suspension and for any services authorized by City thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation, or such a s may be approved by City, except as provided in Section 7.5. In event of termination, or suspension, 425
without cause pursuant to this Section, there is no need to provide opportunity to cure pursuant to Section 7.3.

7.3 Default of Consultant and Opportunity to Cure. In the event that Consultant is in default under the terms of this Agreement, City shall not have any obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default. Instead, City may give notice to Consultant of the default and the reasons for the default. The notice shall include the timeframe in which Consultant may cure the default. This timeframe is presumptively ten (10) days, but may be extended, or reduced, if circumstances warrant, as determined by City. During the period of time that Consultant is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices , without liability for interest. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during the period of default. If Consultant does not cure the default by conclusion of noticed timeframe , City may immediately both terminate this Agreement with notice to Consultant as well as pursue the remedy in Section 7.4, without prejudice to any other remedy to which City may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement . Any failure on the part of City to give notice of Consultant ’s default shall not be deemed to result in a waiver of City ’s legal rights or any rights arising out of any provision of this Agreement.

7.4 Termination for Default of Consultant. If termination is due to the failure of Consultant to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 7.3, take over the work and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Consultant shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such dama ges), and City may withhold any payments to Consultant for the purpose of set-off or partial payment of the amounts owed City therefor.

7.5 Retention of Funds. Consultant hereby authorizes City to deduct from any amount payable to Consultant (whether or not arising out of this Agreement) (i) any amounts the payment of which may be in dispute hereunder or which are necessary to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages suffered by City, and (ii) all amounts for which City may be liable to third parties, by reason of Consultant’s acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform Consultant’s obligation under this Agreement. In the event that any claim is made by a third party, the amount or validity of which is disputed by Consultant, or any indebtedness shall exist which shall appear to be the basis for a claim of lien, City may withhold from any payment due, without liability for interest because of such withholding, an amount sufficient to cover such claim. The failure of City to exercise such right to deduct or to withhold shall not, however, affect the obligations of Consultant to insure, indemnify, and protect City as elsewhere provided herein.
426

7.6 Waiver. Waiver by any Party to this Agreement of any term, condition, or covenant of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term, condition, or covenant. Waiver by any Party of any breach of the provisions of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other provision or a waiver of any subsequent breach or violation of any provision of this Agreement. Acceptance by City of any work or services by Consultant shall not constitute a waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy by a non-defaulting Party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. Any waiver by either Party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Consultant of non- compliance with any requirement of this Agreement imposes no additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder. Payment to Consultant for work performed pursuant to this Agreement shall not be deemed to waive any defects in work performed by Consultant.

7.7 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the Parties are cumulative and the exercise by either Party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other Party.

7.8 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either Party may take legal action, in law or in equity, to cure, correct or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, Consultant shall file a statutory claim pursuant to Government Code s ections 905 et seq. and 910 et seq., in order to pursue a legal action under this Agreement.

7.9 Attorneys’ Fees. If either Party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys ’ fees. Attorneys’ fees shall include attorneys ’ fees on any appeal, and a Party entitled to attorneys’ fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, consultants’ fees, taking depositions and discovery and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such 427
litigation. Such fees and costs shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment.

ARTICLE 8. INDIVIDUAL LIABILITY, CONFLICTS AND NON-DISCRIMINATION

8.1 Non-liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer or employee of City shall be personally liable to Consultant, or any successor in interest, in the event of any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Consultant or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement.

8.2 Conflict of Interest. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Consultant’s performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of City. Consultant agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. City, in its sole discretion, shall determine the existence of a conflict of interest and may terminate this Agreement in the event such a conflict of interest exists upon sending Consultant written notice describing the conflict. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects their financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which they are, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Consultant warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement.

8.3 Covenant Against Discrimination. Consultant covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry or other protected class.

ARTICLE 9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

9.1 Notices. Any notice or other communication either Party desires or is required to give to the other Party or any other person in regards to this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, which provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the Uni ted States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, in the case of 428
City addressed to City Clerk at City of Murrieta, 1 Town Square, Murrieta California 92562, and in the case of Consultant, to the person(s) at the address designated on the cover page of this Agreement. Either Party may change its address by notifying the other Party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated at the time personally delivered or in seventy- two (72) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section.

9.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either Party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement, headings used, or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply.

9.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument.

9.4 Integration; Amendment. This Agreement including the attachments hereto is the entire, complete and exclusive expression of the understanding of the P arties as to the Agreement . It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the Parties hereto affecting this Agreement, and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, arrangements, agreements and understandings, if any, between the Parties , concerning this Agreement, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Consultant and by City.

9.5 Severability. Should a portion of this Agreement be declared invalid or unenforceable by a judgment or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining portions of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the Parties unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either Party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless.

9.6 No Undue Influence. Consultant declares and warrants that no undue influence or pressure was used against or in concert with any officer or employee of City in connection with the award, terms or implementation of this Agreement, including any method of coercion, confidential financial arrangement, or financial inducement. No officer or employee of City has or will receive compensation, directly or indirectly, from Consultant, or from any officer, employee or agent of Consultant, in connection with the award of this Agreement or any work to be conducted as a result of this Agreement. Violation of this Section shall be a material breach of this Agreement entitling City to remedies in Section 7.4 and any and all remedies at law or equity.

9.7 Corporate Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Parties hereto warrant that (i) such Party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said Party , 429
(iii) by so executing this Agreement, such Party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other agreement to which said Party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns of the Parties.

9.8 Federal Funding. If federal funding is being utilized to fund any part of the Project, as indicated on the Cover Page of this Agreement, the terms of Exhibit “E” are hereby incorporated herein by this reference. If no federal funding is being utilized, Exhibit F may be omitted.
[
SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
430
01375.0001 962082.4 -15 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first-above written.

CI
TY OF MURRIETA ATTEST:

By:_____________________________ By:_____________________________ Jon Levell, Mayor Cristal McDonald, City Clerk
Date: ___________________________ Date: ___________________________

APPROVED AS TO FORM
A

LESHIRE & WYNDER, LLP
B
y: ____________________________
T
iffany Israel, City Attorney
CO
NSULTANT:

B
y:_____________________________ By:_____________________________ Name: Brendan Hastie Name: Tim Gabrielson
Title: Vice President Title: Corporate Secretary
Date: ___________________________ Date: ___________________________ Two corporate officer signatures required when Contractor is a corporation, with one signature required from each of the following groups: 1) Chair person of the Board, President or any Vice President; and 2) Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer or any Assistant Treasurer. (Cal. Corp. Code § 313.) Appropriate attestations shall be included as may be required by the bylaws, articles of incorporation or other rules or regulations applicable to Contractor’s business City.

431
01375.0001 962082.4
EX

HIBIT A
S

COPE OF SERVICES
I. Consultant will perform the following Services:

The Consultant shall provide all professional, technical, and administrative services necessary to prepare a comprehensive Citywide Storm Drain Master Plan (SDMP) for the City of Murrieta. Services include full project management; coordination with City st aff; preparation of schedules; progress reporting; QA/QC; participation in public, commission, and City Council meetings; and complete file and data management. The Consultant shall research, compile, and verify all available drainage‑related data; develop a unified GIS‑based inventory of the City’s storm drain infrastructure; digitize and incorporate as‑built plans; identify missing or incorrect data; perform field verification as needed; and produce a model‑ready GIS geodatabase with feature attributes, connectivity, metadata, and confidence levels. The Consultant shall prepare basin delineations and conduct hydrologic and hydraulic analyses in accordance with RCFC & WCD methodologies, developing a 1D/2D model reflecting existing conditions, overland flow, and MS4 system performance for required storm events. Using model results, the Consultant shall identify system deficiencies; determine required improvements and associated sizing; identify missing or recommended new conveyance facilities; and evaluate mu lti‑benefit and regional opportunities. The Consultant shall develop prioritized near‑term and long‑term capital improvement recommendations supported by cost estimates, prioritization scoring, and identification of potential local, state, and federal funding sources. The Consultant shall prepare a Draft and Final Storm Drain Master Plan including all required exhibits, maps, technical documentation, and GIS/model files, and shall provide a web‑based GIS viewer for City use. The Consultant shall also prepare a memorandum outlining best practices and recommendations for ongoing operation, maintenance, and inspection of the City’s storm drain assets. Optional services may include CCTV inspection of selected facilities and additional as‑built digitization, if requested by the City.

II. All work product is subject to review and acceptance by the City, and must be revised by the Consultant without additional charge to the City until found satisfactory and accepted by City.
432

RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY TOTAL
Labor Classification
Principal
Associate/
Manager
Principal Project
Engineer/Manager
Associate Project
Engineer/Manager
Principal Water
Resources Designer
Associate Water
Resources Designer
Assistant Water
Resources Designer
GIS Asset Manager
GIS Programmer
Grant
Writing/Funding
Specialist
Task Billing Rates $300 $260 $240 $220 $175 $160 $145 $200 $180 $180 TASK 1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT, MEETINGS, AND COORDINATION

1.1 Project Kickoff Meeting 2 8 2 2 $3,440 $3,440 $0 $3,440

1.2 Progress Meetings (Assumes 9 meetings) 4 18 $5,880 $5,880 $5,880

1.3 Agendas and Meeting Minutes 18 $4,680 $4,680 $4,680

1.4 Public and Council Meetings (Assumes 2 Meetings) 4 6 8 20 8 12 4 $12,360 $12,360 $12,360

1.5 Project Tracking and File Management 15 20 $7,900 $7,900 $0 $7,900

1.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 4 30 $9,000 $9,000 $0 $9,000 Task 1 Sub-Total 14 95 8 0 0 20 0 30 12 6 $43,260 $0 $43,260 $0 $43,260 TASK 2.RESEARCH, DATA COLLECTION, AND COMPILATION

2.1 Compile Available Drainage System Data 8 8 2 20 24 24 20 10 $21,060 $21,060 $0 $21,060

2.2 Existing Infrastructure Digitization and As-Built Verification 4 4 120 50 20 20 $35,890 $35,890 $35,890

2.3 Identify Critical Missing or Incorrect Data 8 8 10 20 10 10 10 $14,200 $14,200 $14,200

2.4 Identify Missing Infrastructure 8 4 30 10 $9,290 $9,290 $9,290

2.5 Confidence-Based Field Validation 8 8 12 80 10 10 $23,240 $420 $23,660 $0 $23,660

2.6 Compile GIS Data and Assemble Inventory Database 4 30 20 $10,640 $10,640 $0 $10,640 Task 2 Sub-Total 0 36 32 18 30 274 94 90 70 0 $114,320 $420 $114,740 $0 $114,740 TASK 3. EXISTING CONDITION HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS AND

MODELING

3.1 Compile Hydrologic Data and Generate Subcatchments (Assumes 2100 Subcatchments) 2 4 16 24 40 100 80 40 20 $56,960 $56,960 $0 $56,960

3.2 Existing Condition Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model 2 8 16 24 80 180 140 20 $78,500 $78,500 $0 $78,500 Task 3 Sub-Total 4 12 32 48 120 280 220 40 40 0 $135,460 $0 $135,460 $0 $135,460 TASK 4. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS (CIP DEVELOPMENT)

4.1 Identify Existing Deficiencies and Improvements 1 20 20 30 30 80 80 20 20 $54,150 $54,150 $0 $54,150

4.2 Identify Missing Proposed Improvements 2 12 12 18 30 80 40 $34,410 $34,410 $34,410

4.3 Identify Multi-Benefit and Water Quality Opportunity Sites 4 14 10 6 $7,070 $7,070 $7,070

4.4 Prepare Opinion of Probable Construction Costs 4 6 30 30 $11,630 $11,630 $11,630

4.5 Prioritize Improvements Using a Scoring Matrix 1 12 8 12 10 20 30 $17,280 $17,280 $0 $17,280

4.6 Identify Funding Source 8 80 $16,480 $16,480 $0 $16,480 Task 4 Sub-Total 4 60 46 74 80 210 180 26 20 80 $141,020 $141,020 $0 $141,020 TASK 5. DEVELOP THE STORM DRAIN MASTER PLAN

5.1 Compile GIS and Modeling Results into Web-Based Viewer 4 8 32 16 $12,240 $12,240 $0 $12,240

5.2 Prepare Draft Storm Drain Master Plan 2 16 24 12 16 16 8 10 10 $23,240 $23,240 $0 $23,240

5.3 Final SDMP 2 12 8 8 12 12 4 $11,780 $11,780 $11,780

5.4 O&M Best Practices Memo 2 8 16 14 12 12 $13,260 $13,260 $0 $13,260 Task 5 Sub-Total 6 40 56 34 0 40 40 40 30 10 $60,520 $0 $60,520 $0 $60,520 OPTIONAL TASK A – CCTV FIELD INSPECTIONS
A.1 CCTV Inspection and PACP Condition Grading (10 Days Assumed) 4 8 10 20 $8,400 $8,400 $30,000 $38,400 OPTIONAL TASK B – ADDITONAL AS-BUILT PLAN DIGITIZATION
B.1 Additional As-Built Data Digitization (T&M NTE) 4 8 80 80 20 $31,200 $31,200 $31,200 Optional Tasks Sub-Total 0 8 0 16 0 90 80 40 0 0 39,600 0 39,600 30,000 69,600 Total Project Hours 28 243 174 174 230 824 534 226 172 96 Total Project Hours (w/ Optional Tasks) 28 251 174 190 230 914 614 266 172 96 Total Project Cost (w/ out Optional Tasks) $8,400 $63,180 $41,760 $38,280 $40,250 $131,840 $77,430 $45,200 $30,960 $17,280 $494,580 $420 $495,000 $0 $495,000 Total Project Cost (w/ Optional Tasks) $8,400 $65,260 $41,760 $41,800 $40,250 $146,240 $89,030 $53,200 $30,960 $17,280 $534,180 $420 $534,600 $30,000 $564,600 Total Cost
Cost Loaded Work Plan

CITY OF MURRIETA
Professional Engineering Services for the City of Murrieta Storm Drain Master Plan RICK Labor Cost
Reimbursable
Expenses
RICK Total Cost
Optional CCTV
Partner
433

QUALIFICATIONS TO PROVIDE
Consultant Services for a Storm
Drain System Master Plan
F or the City of Murrieta
Pr oject No. 21-446 / CIP 19002
N ovember 19, 2025
/ 5620 Friars Road, San Diego, CA 92110
/ (619) 291-0707
/ RICKENGINEERING.COM
434
1 November 19, 2025
City of Murrieta
Attn: Josh Forhman, PE, Associate Civil Engineer
1 Town Square
Murrieta, CA 92562
SUBJECT: Qualifications for Consultant Services for a Storm Drain Master Plan Dear Mr. Fohrman,
RICK Engineering Company (RICK) is pleased to submit our Statement of Qualifications to prepare the City of Murrieta’s Storm Drain Master Plan (SDMP). RICK has supported the City for many years, and our team brings unmatched familiarity with local drainage issues, regional hydrology, and the infrastructure needs of rapidly developing communities across Southwest Riverside County.

Our approach aligns directly with the RFQ requirements and emphasizes clear communication, defensible analysis, and practical implementation. As a true one-stop-shop, RICK will complete all GIS, modeling, asset verification, and QA/QC in-house, ensuring consistency, reducing coordination cost, and avoiding the fragmented subcontracting approach. This integrated structure provides Murrieta with a streamlined delivery team and a single point of accountability throughout the project.

Our proposed Implementation Approach focuses on:
• A model-ready GIS inventory with confidence tracking to support long-term maintenance and lifecycle asset management
• A combined 1D/2D hydrologic and hydraulic model to capture system performance, overland flow, and provide visual results that significantly improve the communication value of the model results • A prioritized, funding-focused CIP program aligned with regional and state grant opportunities • A web-based GIS viewer so City staff can easily access, visualize, and communicate SDMP results RICK Engineering Company is a California corporation located at 5620 Friars Road, San Diego, CA 92110. We have reviewed and acknowledge Addenda 1, 2, and 3 posted on PlanetBids.

Please contact Andrew Thies at (619) 688-1454 [email protected] or Brendan Hastie, P.E. at (619) 204-5979 [email protected] with any questions.

Thank you for your time and consideration. We appreciate the opportunity to continue our partnership with the City of Murrieta through this important project.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
Andrew Thies, CFM Brendan Hastie, PE, LEED AP
Project Manager Principal In Charge

1. Transmittal Letter
435
2 2. Table of Contents

3. Executive Summary
The City is seeking a highly qualified professional consultant to develop a Storm Drain Master Plan. RICK has the leadership to provide the best service and qualifications to support the plan development. This statement of qualifications was structured to match the major sections listed in the RFQ and below is the concise synopsis starting with Section 4:

4. Introduction: Highlights the extensive experience RICK brings in supporting local jurisdictions with Strom Drain Master Plans.

5. Company Background: Provide company background for RICK.

6. Project Management: Project management approach will be based on four critical elements (coordination; project planning and scheduling; cost control; and QA/QC program) and continuous improvement.

7. Staff: The strongest asset of our team is the key team members we have assembled. This section summarizes the qualifications and experience of the staff.

8. Qualifications and References: This section provides project descriptions and references from four projects that are comparable to the services requested in this City contract and demonstrate quality, results-driven work over the past five years.

9. Fee Proposal: Per the RFP, the fee proposal is included under a separate cover.

10. Anticipated Project Schedule: Provides an anticipated schedule of 15 months which includes a one-month buffer.

11. Implementation Approach: Summarizes the proposed approach including scope of work, efforts needed to ensure a successful project, possible solutions to support a successful delivery of the project, list of deliverables and assumption made in development of the schedule and work plan.

12. Additional Information: Acknowledges the addenda and a completed statement of compliance form.

SECTION PAGE SECTION PAGE

1. Transmittal Letter and Statement of
Understanding and Approach
1 7. Staff 6

2. Table of Contents 2 8. Qualifications and References 8

3. Executive Summary 2 9. Fee Proposal (separate document) --

4. Introduction 3 10. Anticipated Project Schedule 12

5. Company Background 4 11. Implementation Approach 13

6. Project Management 5 12. Appendix - Additional Information 436
3 4. Introduction
RICK Engineering Company (RICK) is a California-based civil engineering and water resources firm with over two decades of experience preparing Storm Drain Master Plans, drainage studies, and GIS-based infrastructure inventories for jurisdictions throughout the region. Our portfolio includes work in Menifee, Paso Robles, Tustin, San Marcos, Carlsbad, Lemon Grove, and the City and County of San Diego, projects similar in scope and complexity to the City of Murrieta’s Storm Drain Master Plan. These efforts, shown on the accompanying Experience Map, demonstrate our ability to support municipalities with basin planning, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, GIS modernization, and CIP development.

RICK offers the City a team that is already familiar with Murrieta’s drainage system, data environment, and local hydrology.

Our previous support to the City positions us to begin work efficiently, reduce onboarding time, and focus on the technical components that will have the greatest long-term value. Because our hydrology, hydraulics, GIS, asset management, and CIP specialists work together in-house, all inventory development, modeling, QA/QC, and analysis for this project will be performed internally. This integrated approach ensures consistency, predictable schedules, and high-quality technical review without reliance on external subconsultants.

Our qualifications align directly with the needs of this SDMP. RICK has extensive experience developing model- ready drainage inventories with confidence tracking; completing 1D/2D hydrologic and hydraulic models for citywide infrastructure systems; identifying and sizing systemwide deficiencies; preparing funding-focused CIP recommendations; and delivering GIS-centered tools that help City staff maintain, update, and communicate drainage information effectively.

These capabilities support the City’s goals for an implementable, technically defensible, and easily maintainable Storm Drain Master Plan completed in a timely manner.

RICK is committed to continuing our partnership with the City of Murrieta by delivering an SDMP that provides clear insight into system performance, practical recommendations, and tools to support long-term infrastructure planning and funding. 437
4 Firm Background
RICK is a local multidisciplinary engineering, landscape architecture, and planning firm known throughout the Western United States for providing high-quality service and value to clients for 70 years. Our company’s broad array of engineering disciplines allows us to provide comprehensive services that can be managed in-house to assure optimum project quality and efficiency.

RICK’s Water Resources Department provides comprehensive storm water solutions for public works and land development, guiding projects from the planning phase through the entitlement process, final design, and construction. As experts in water resource analysis and planning for more than 40 years, our team offers a wide range of experience in stormwater management, including surface runoff modeling, flood control design, hydraulic and sediment transport analyses, urban drainage design, FEMA floodplain mapping and processing, GIS master planning, and stormwater quality modeling and design.

Many of our clients face a complex regulatory environment, including drainage, water quality, and floodplain-related constraints. Our expert engineers are well-versed in local, state, and federal water resources requirements and are able to guide clients through the process. We deploy state-of-the-art technologies to assist with data analysis, modeling, and design. We provide smart solutions for complex issues.

Personnel Summary
Brendan Hastie, PE, LEED AP, will serve as Principal in Charge and Andrew Thies, CFM, will serve as Project Manager. Brendan Hastie, Andrew Thies, and Venkat Gummadi have ownership positions at RICK and will be supporting this project.

RICK Revenue and Profit
As requested in the RFQ, the following chart outlines RICK’s annual company revenues and profit for the last three fiscal years.

NOTE: Profit reflects earnings before discretionary expenses and income tax provision.

FIRM
Rick Engineering Company
(RICK)

LOCATION OF OFFICES
San Diego (HQ)
Riverside
Orange
San Luis Obispo
Santa Clarita
Sacramento
Las Vegas
Phoenix
Tucson
Arvada
Centennial

OFFICE TO SERVE CITY
San Diego (HQ)
5620 Friars Road
San Diego, CA 92110

FISCAL YEAR REVENUE/SALES PROFIT/(LOSS)
2022 66,322,721 8,612,285
2023 69,277,737 2,622,938
2024 76,765,837 1,936,560

5. Company Background
CO
Santa Clarita
Irvine
San Diego
Tucson
Riverside
Las Vegas
CA
NV
AZ
Sacramento
Phoenix
Arvada
Centennial
San Luis Obispo
438
5 We understand the importance of providing close individual attention to each project and to working within the constraints of time and budget. Our management approach is based on years of successful project experience on similar projects in the region and for the City. Our approach will be based on five critical elements and continuous improvement:

Communication and Coordination
Communication and coordination with City staff will be
key in meeting the City’s project goals. The success
of our project performance is a result of our close
communication and coordination with our public agency
clients. We have specific protocols to ensure the chain of communication between the City, the team, cooperating
public agencies, and the project stakeholders, is
established early and actively maintained throughout the project life cycle. In his role as Project Manager, Andrew Thies, CFM, will be responsible for establishing and
maintaining all project management procedures. Principal- in-Charge, Brendan Hastie, PE, LEED AP, will support
Andrew, as needed, in implementing our established
procedures and providing any needed resources to the
project.

Project Planning, Scheduling, and Schedule
Reporting Software
Detailed planning at the beginning of the project is
essential to reduce risk, ensure quality, and maintain
schedule and budget. As part of our proven planning
and scheduling practice, Andrew will formalize a Work
Plan at the outset of the project. This Work Plan will
include project scope tasks, budgets, and deliverables
as well as the responsible parties for each item. In
addition to delivering it to the City, Andrew will distribute and review the Work Plan with team members to ensure
understanding and compliance. He will create a detailed schedule using Microsoft Project to organize the overall project tasks and budget and track actual versus
scheduled work and costs. The detailed Microsoft Project schedule will be shared during the kick-off meeting.

Cost Control
Successful project management requires accommodating
project adjustments while maintaining budget and
schedule. Andrew will continuously monitor the activities of the project team, tracking actual progress versus
budgeted costs. Should deviations occur, he will take
immediate corrective action. To facilitate this effort, RICK will use Deltek Advantage to track expenditures,
including both labor and direct costs, on a weekly and
long-term basis. Up-to-date information is available to the Project Manager at all times, and progress reports will be included with each monthly invoice for City review and
approval.

Quality Assurance / Quality Control
RICK promotes a continuous emphasis and commitment
to quality control through all phases of its projects. These practice standards must conform to the expectations of
our clients, the engineering industry, public agencies, and the community. This is facilitated by attention to
the company’s manual on quality control standards,
periodic quality control seminars, and staff performance reviews throughout the company. These measures are
applied to all levels of work, including project scheduling, documentation, plan preparation, and field survey.

For this project, Quality Control Review will not only be a continuous effort led by our Project Manager and design team, but assured by Venkat Gummadi, PE, QSD/P,
CPESC, our QA/QC Manager, throughout the project
duration. By using this process, all deliverables will be subject to internal reviews prior to submittal to the City.

6. Project Management
439
6 7. Staff
A. Organizational Chart
A well-organized team, with a clear division of responsibilities is essential to successful delivery of any project. The organizational chart presented below delineates the project tasks that each key team member will be responsible for and the reporting/communication structure within the team.

Serving as the Primary Contact, our Project Manager,
Andrew Thies, CFM, will have full responsibility for meeting this project’s requirements, on time and within budget.

All proposed staff are RICK employees, unless otherwise noted.

Resumes for staff members with asterisks are
provided in the Appendix.

Our proposed team’s collaborative experience fosters
better communication, a shared understanding of roles
and responsibilities, and the ability to anticipate challenges, ultimately leading to more effective collaboration and a successful project outcome.

PROJECT MANAGER:

Andrew Thies CFM*

QA /QC MANAGER &
TECHINCAL ADVISOR:

Venkat Gummadi PE, QSD/P , CPESC*

WATER RESOURCES
ENGINEERING:

Kevin McKinnon PE*
Lukas Thompson PE*
Bavya Vuppalapati EIT*
Callum McRae EIT*
Chris Mattox PE*
Daniel Angel EIT

GIS / ASSET
MANAGEMENT:

Mikala Randich *
Mario Terrazas
Ben Alonzo

FUNDING & FEE
STRATEGIES:

Sydney Rankmore *
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE:

Brendan Hastie PE, LEED AP*
RICK has proven experience in completing major projects and tasks for numerous, local agencies. Our staff has
worked on many relevant projects/tasks and has a proven track record of producing quality products that are on
schedule and meet the client’s needs. The following list provides a sampling of RICK’s current local Southern
California clients.

Our proposed work plan to sucessfully deliver this project is presented in Section 11 and proposed schedule is
presented in Section 10. This project work will be executed from RICK’s San Diego office.

Current Client List
» City of San Diego
» County of San Diego
» City of Murrieta
» City of Menifee
» City of Tustin
» City of Paso Robles
» City of Riverside
» Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District (RCFC&WCD)
440
7 Name Role Certifications Highest Degree Years of
Experience
Key Personnel
Venkat Gummadi QA/QC Manager & Technical
Advisor

PE, CPESC,
QSD/P MS, Civil Engineering 17
Brendan Hastie Principal-in-charge PE, LEED AP BS, Civil Engineering 25 Andrew Thies Project Manager EIT, CFM BS, Civil Engineering 11 Kevin McKinnon Water Resources Engineering PE, QSP/QSD MBA, BS, Civil Engineering 11 Lukas Thompson Water Resources Engineering PE, QSD/P BS, Civil and Environmental Engineering 10
Bavya Vuppalapati Water Resources Engineering EIT MS, Water Resources 9 Callum McRae Water Resources Engineering EIT BS, Environmental Engineering 3
Chris Mattox Water Resources Engineering PE BS, Environmental Engineering 11
Mikala Randich GIS / Asset Management CSPR SC BS, Environmental Science 8 Sydney Rankmore Funding & Fee Strategies RPP MCIP MS, Community and Regional Planning 6
Additional
Support Staff
Mario Terrazas GIS / Asset Management - - 28
Ben Alonzo GIS / Asset Management GISP MS, GIS 15
Daniel Angel Water Resources Engineering EIT BS, Civil Engineering 1 Total Hours
Brendan Hastie
Venkat Gummadi
Andrew Thies
Kevin McKinnon
Lukas Thompson
Bavya Vuppalapati
Callum McRae
Chris Mattox
Mikala Randich
Sydney Rankmore
Mario Terrazas
Ben Alonzo
Daniel Angel
Task 1 - Project Management 185 4% 4% 51% 4% 0% 0% 11% 0% 8% 3% 8% 6% 0% Task 2 - Research, Data
Collection, and Compilation 648 0% 0% 6% 4% 1% 5% 43% 1% 8% 0% 8% 9% 15% Task 3 - Existing Condition H&H
Analysis & Modeling 796 0% 1% 2% 4% 3% 15% 35% 3% 3% 0% 3% 5% 28% Task 4 - Recommended
Improvements 780 0% 1% 8% 6% 5% 10% 27% 5% 2% 10% 2% 3% 23% Task 5 - Develop SDMP 296 1% 1% 14% 19% 6% 0% 14% 6% 7% 3% 7% 10% 14% Optional Task A- CCTV Field Insp. 42 0% 0% 10% 0% 10% 0% 24% 10% 24% 0% 24% 0% 0% Optional Task B- Add’l As Built
Plan Digitization 192 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 0% 42% 42% 5% 5% 0% 0% 0% The matrix below shows the effort in percentage of total in person-hours, that will be contributed by each professional, during each phase and the overall project.

B. Staff Experience and Effort Matrices
The table below shows the qualifications and experience of professionals selected to support the City on this project. It includes both key personnel and additional support staff. 441
8 8. Qualifications and References

PROJECTS
CALIF0RNIA MUNICIPALITIES SCOPE
Menifee Drainage Master Plan | City of Menifee *      Lemon Grove Drainage Master Plan | City of Lemon Grove *      Carlsbad Drainage Master Plan | City of Carlsbad *       Tustin Storm Drain Master Plan | City of Tustin *     Waterway Naturalization Study | City of Agoura Hills      Drainage Master Plan Update | City of Paso Robles       Downtown Watershed Plan | City of Atascadero       Rainbow Creek Watershed Implementation Plan | County of San Diego      Multiple Watershed Master Plans | City of San Diego      San Marcos Drainage Master Plan | City of San Marcos      El Cajon Citywide Drainage Master Plan | City of El Cajon      GIS Drainage Master Plans for SDA 1, 3, 7, 8, 10 | County of San Diego       South Mission Beach Watershed Master Plan | City of San Diego      Encinitas Creek Drainage Master Plan | City of Encinitas      Vista Drainage Master Plan | City of Vista     
Ocean Beach Drainage Master Plan | City of San Diego      Gonzales Drainage Master Plan | City of Gonzales      East Otay Mesa Drainage Master Plan | County of San Diego     Eden Valley Drainage Master Plan | County of San Diego     Seeley Drainage Master Plan | Imperial County      * Detailed project descriptions provided on following pages.

The following pages provide project descriptions for three projects which are comparable to the services requested in this City contract and demonstrate quality, results-driven work over the past five years. We have selected projects that demonstrate our technical expertise, as well as our history of timely, budget-sensitive delivery. All projects were completed on time and within budget.

We encourage you to contact the referenced clients
for further information regarding our qualifications and experience.

Additionally, RICK has received no claims for errors and omissions relative to municipal Strom Drain Master Plan projects over the last ten years.

With decades of directly related project experience and comprehensive in-house water resources capabilities, we present unique benefits to the City. Our Water Resources Division staff includes well-known specialists in hydrology and hydraulics, with wide-ranging experience in preparing SDMPs, storm drain design, and integrating GIS services to enhance the value of storm drain inventories and analyses.

We have provided similar services for a variety of local municipalities and public agencies, including the Cities of Menifee, Carlsbad, San Marcos, Lemon Grove, El Cajon,
Encinitas, San Diego, and County of San Diego.

The following matrix provides an overview of RICK’s SDMP experience in California. Detailed project descriptions are also provided for a subset of projects. These projects
consist of nearly identical services to those expected
by the City. Each design team remained unchanged
throughout the project. This project history demonstrates our ability to deliver high-quality services with a cohesive team of professionals and our proven ability to provide all services required for the SDMP.

PROJECT MANAGEMENTRESEARCH|DATA COLLECTION H&H ANALYSIS |MODELINGRECOMMENED IMP.| CIP DEV.CIP FUNDING ANALYSISDEVELOP SDMP 442
9 CITY OF MENIFEE: 29844 HAUN ROAD MENIFEE, CA 92586
Master Drainage Plan and Culvert
Inspections Program
CITY OF TUSTIN: 300 CENTENNIAL WAY, TUSTIN, CA 92780
Storm Drain Master Plan: 2025
RICK prepared a comprehensive Citywide Master
Drainage Plan integrating a fully connected,
GIS-based storm drain inventory and 1D/2D
hydrologic and hydraulic modeling consistent
with RCFC&WCD methodologies. Extensive
GIS data development was performed including
digitizing as-builts, correcting connectivity, and
verifying field data that enabled the production
of an accurate, hydraulically linked system.

The model identified capacity deficiencies,
informed recommended improvements, and
defined regional opportunities for multi-benefit
(flood control/water quality) projects.

Coordination with RCFC&WCD ensured
consistency with City and County standards,
region-specific design criteria, and regional
drainage plans. Recommendations were
bundled into implementable projects with
preliminary cost estimates, supporting both
5-year and 20-year Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) planning. All deliverables were
provided through an interactive, GIS-centered
web application, allowing the City to visualize
existing conditions, proposed improvements,
and project priorities for long-term stormwater
infrastructure management.

RICK is assisting the City of Tustin in preparing a comprehensive Storm Drain Master Plan to analyze the City’s existing drainage infrastructure. The effort requires the development of a city-wide GIS inventory of drainage facilities for both City- and County-owned facilities. A standardized GIS data schema, developed with City staff input, was created that ensures consistency across the municipalities in the region.

Building on verified inventory data, RICK is developing an inspection prioritization matrix that considers facility type, age, size, and location to guide planned CCTV inspections and targeted field verification.

The project will result in a fully connected GIS storm drain network, including inventory confidence and condition assessment mapping, to identify areas requiring additional inspection or field verification.

Once the system is fully connected, a dual-drainage hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) model will identify deficiencies under existing and future build-out conditions for the 2-, 10-, 25, and 100-year storm events. Model results, combined with inspection findings, will inform development of future CIP projects. The team will also explore funding strategies and grant opportunities to support implementation and ensure long-term system resilience.

CLIENT
City of Menifee

CONTACT INFORMATION
Run Chen, PE, PMP
Senior Engineer, Public Works
(858) 495-5257
COMPLETED COST *
$711,000

ESTIMATED COST PRIOR TO

CONTRACTING
$668,000

KEY STAFF
Brendan Hastie, PE, LEED AP
PIC
Andrew Thies, CFM
Project Manager
* PRICES REFLECT BOTH

PROJECTS
CLIENT
City of Tustin

CONTACT INFORMATION
Alex Waite
Senior Management Analyst
(714) 573-3305

COMPLETED COST
N/A

ESTIMATED COST PRIOR TO

CONTRACTING
$692,000

KEY STAFF
Brendan Hastie, PE, LEED AP
Principal In Charge
Andrew Thies, CFM
Project Manager
Drainage Conveyance & Deficiency Mapping
CIP Project Identification
443
10 CITY OF CARLSBAD: 1635 FARADAY AVENUE, CARLSBAD, CA 92008 Drainage Master Plan Update: 2024
RICK prepared a citywide DMP to
assess existing drainage deficiencies
in the City’s infrastructure and provide
recommendations to improve the
stormwater conveyance system.

Recommendations focused on large-scale
storm drain CIP projects, and potential
regional improvements opportunities for
stormwater detention and water quality.

A fiscal & fee analysis was also prepared to inform revisions to the City’s existing development impact fee program.

RICK assessed drainage components by creating detailed H&H models using high-resolution geospatial datasets. The drainage analysis focused on the public drainage infrastructure system, including pipes, culverts, open channels, and inlets. Development of detailed H&H models using a dual drainage approach to estimate 1D conveyance capacity of surface and subsurface systems for the 2, 10, and 100-Year (24-Hour) storm events. A 2D model approach was performed at drainage “hot spot” locations and regions with very flat topography to create a detailed visual representation of surface flow routing, split flow conditions, surface storage, and flow attenuation within areas of concern.

CONTACT INFORMATION
David Edwards, MS, PE, CFM
Senior Engineer
(760) 271-7147

COMPLETED COST
$1,010,000

ESTIMATED COST PRIOR

TO CONTRACTING
$945,000

KEY PERSONNEL
Brendan Hastie, PE, LEED AP
Project Manager/PIC
Andrew Thies, CFM
Deputy Project Manager
CITY OF LEMON GROVE: 3232 MAIN STREET LEMON GROVE, CA 91945 Drainage Master Plan: 2020
RICK assisted the City in successfully
leveraging Senate Bill 1 (SB1) funding to
address sinkholes and failing infrastructure
caused by deteriorating CMP storm drains
and recurring flooded areas, in order to
support the planning, design, funding, and
implementation of future CIP projects.

RICK assessed the drainage components of
the DMP by utilizing high-resolution spatial
datasets to generate detailed H&H models. A holistic modeling program was used to prepare models for multiple storm events for over five square miles of the City. The models used a dual drainage approach, which allowed for dynamic interaction between the 2D surface routing, storage, detention (above and below ground), and 1D pipe flow, to provide a finely detailed model of the study areas drainage infrastructure.

The project included identifying areas for potential future projects to provide detention and/or water quality benefits. The City’s CMP storm drains were graded based on a rating system that assigned each pipe with a repair priority and repair techniques were recommended for each length of pipe. The comprehensive assessments of the network resulted in a list of prioritized, site-specific, bundled, implementation-ready projects for City officials to reference in order to advance the watershed management goals of the City.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Mike James, Assistant City Manager
*previously at City of Lemon Grove now
at City of Encinitas
(760) 633-2795

COMPLETED COST
$299,000

ESTIMATED COST PRIOR TO

CONTRACTING
$299,000

KEY STAFF
Brendan Hastie, PE, LEED AP
Project Manager/PIC
Andrew Thies, CFM
Deputy Project Manager
444
11 KEY POTENTIAL

CHALLENGES RICK SOLUTION/BENEFIT WHERE WE HAVE DONE THIS BEFORE Unclear project
objectives that
jeopardize City
Council approval
Utilize the kick-off meeting to review
recently completed master plans with
various objectives to establish clear
goals and intentions ensuring a
successful project for all parties.
» City of Lemon Grove
DMP
» City of San Marcos
DMP
» City of El Cajon DMP
Fragmented and
outdated storm
drain data
Compile available GIS, ADP/MDP, as-
built, and FEMA data into a unified
geodatabase with Confidence Level
tracking. Use a Priority Matrix to focus
verification on high-consequence
trunk mains and crossings. Produce a
Model-Ready inventory that improves
modeling accuracy and lowers long-term
maintenance costs.
» Rainbow Creek WIP
» City of Lemon Grove
DMP
» City of Menifee
» City of Carlsbad DMP
» City of Paso Robles
DMP
Identifying
systemwide
deficiencies and
scalable solutions

Using hydraulic-model results, provide
citywide recommendations for all
deficient pipes and culverts with unit
costs, determine required sizes per
City standards, and coordinate with
staff to select up to 10 representative
projects for further refinement. This
gives the City a holistic understanding
of system needs at low cost.
» City of Tustin SDMP
» City of San Diego
IDEAs
» City of San Diego
WMP
» City of Menifee DMP
» City of Paso Robles
DMP
Developing
actionable and
fundable CIP
recommendations
Translate hydrologic and hydraulic
results into clear, prioritized, grant-
ready projects, supported by a
transparent scoring matrix and
planning-level costs. Identify short-
term and long-term funding strategies
and align eligible projects with
programs such as FEMA BRIC,
CalOES, SRF, IRWM, and regional
partnerships.
» City of Carlsbad
» City of Lemon Grove
DMP
» City of San Marcos
DMP
» County of San Diego
SDA DMPs
» City of Paso Robles
DMP
Integrating
long-term data
management and
staff capacity
Deliver a comprehensive GIS database
and ArcGIS Online Web Viewer, configured
for City use.
» Paso Robles
Downtown Watershed
Plan
» City of Menifee DMP
» Atascadero Downtown
Watershed Plan
» Port of San Diego
» City of Paso Robles
DMP
Potential Challenges & Solutions
Potential challenges, our proposed solutions, and our experience addressing similar challenges for other clients are presented in the table below.
445

10. Anticipated Project Schedule
The below table reflects the anticipated project schedule, showing all work tasks included in the scope of work, as well as the estimated duration to complete each task, with estimated start/finish dates. We plan to present a detailed Microsoft Project Schedule that will breakdown the schedule at a subtask level during the kick-off meeting and will make necessary adjustments based on feedback from City staff within five (5) business days from the kick-off meeting.

9. Fee Proposal
Per the RFQ instructions, fee proposal is provided under separate cover. 12 2026 2027
Task
Number Task Name Duration Key Milestones/Ciy Review Points Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Kickoff Project Kickoff - 2/23/2026 Kickoff meeting & work plan approval 1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT,
MEETINGS, AND COORDINATION Ongoing Monthly coordination meetings, QA/QC checkpoints, progress reports
2 RESEARCH, DATA COLLECTION,
AND COMPILATION 90 Days City review of compiled GIS & record drawings
3 EXISTING CONDITION H&H
MODELING 120 Days
Subcatchment Maps, Modeling Files,
ExistinG Condition H&H Technical Memo
Deliverable: Existing System PCSWMM
Model and Results (Jun 2026)
4 RECOMMENDED

IMPROVEMENTS (CIP

DEVELOPMENT)
120 Days
Identification of Citywide deficient
facilities, Proposed project prioritization,
5-year and 20-year Program
5 DEVELOP THE STORM DRAIN
MASTER PLAN 60 Days
Draft SDMP Submittal, City Review, Final
SDMP, Data Delivery
Deliverable: Draft 1D/2D Model Results
(Feb 2026)
Optional A CCTV INSPECTION 60 Days Optional at City’s request (can run parallel to Tasks 2-3)
PROJECT COMPLETION 30 Days
* Optional Task B will run concurrently with Tasks 2 and 3 of the proposed scope 446
13 The RICK Team brings decades of experience delivering high-resolution storm drain master plans across California, including recent efforts for the Cities of Tustin, Agoura Hills, Paso Robles, Carlsbad, Lemon Grove, and San Diego. Our
familiarity with Murrieta’s infrastructure, coupled with our technical understanding of regional drainage and permitting requirements, ensures a practical and informed approach.

The map below illustrates Murrieta’s major drainage
systems, FEMA flood zones, key hydrologic features, and jurisdictional boundaries, providing the spatial foundation for field inspections, modeling, and CIP development.

Cole
Canyon
Yode
rCreek
Warm S
pringsCreek
Conduits Segment Count Linear Feet
Main 2,892 147,247
Channel 517 38,658
Lateral 1,524 30,252
Stream 449 116,148
Other 203 6,906
Total 5,585 339,211
Structures Count
Catch Basin 1,854
Inlet 156
Manhole 1,202
Inflow 410
Outflow 512
Detention Basin 32
Total 4,166
15 215
15 Cole
Canyon
Yode
rCreek
Wa
rm Spr
ingsCreek
Conduits Segment Count Linear Feet
Main 2,892 147,247
Channel 517 38,658
Lateral 1,524 30,252
Stream 449 116,148
Other 203 6,906
Total 5,585 339,211
Structures Count
Catch Basin 1,854
Inlet 156
Manhole 1,202
Inflow 410
Outflow 512
Detention Basin 32
Total 4,166
15 15
Cole
Canyon
Yode
rCreek
Warm Sprin
gs Creek
Conduits Segment Count Linear Feet
Main 2,892 147,247
Channel 517 38,658
Lateral 1,524 30,252
Stream 449 116,148
Other 203 6,906
Total 5,585 339,211
Structures Count
Catch Basin 1,854
Inlet 156
Manhole 1,202
Inflow 410
Outflow 512
Detention Basin 32
Total 4,166
15 15

11. Implementation Approach
RICK’s approach is centered on developing a Storm
Drain Master Plan that is directly usable for day-to-day public works decision-making, CIP planning, development review, and maintenance strategy. Because our team has
supported the City of Murrieta across drainage, mapping, and capital planning efforts, and recently delivered a
comparable citywide SDMP for a neighboring Inland
Empire jurisdiction, RICK begin with a clear understanding of regional hydrology, ADP/MDP context, maintenance
practices, and City expectations. This reduces project
startup time, avoids unnecessary rework, and supports
efficient, accurate progress toward City goals.

RICK will deliver:
• A City-maintainable GIS drainage inventory
• A calibrated, transparent hydrologic and hydraulic
model that is RCFC & WCD compliant
• A defensible and fundable CIP prioritized for maximum community benefit
• A Web GIS Viewer and staff training to ensure the
SDMP remains a living, updateable system
This ensures the City receives a plan that supports
implementation, not just documentation.
447
14 TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Our team will manage this project as an extension of
City staff, emphasizing predictable communication, clear decision-making, and proactive issue resolution.

1.1 Kick-Off Meeting
RICK will conduct a kickoff meeting with City staff at Notice to Proceed to refine goals, confirm data availability, align communication protocols, and finalize the Project Work
Plan with milestones and review cycles.

1.2 Progress Meetings
RICK will conduct regular project progress meetings (virtual or in-person) with City staff to maintain alignment and make timely decisions regarding modeling assumptions,
data needs, CIP prioritization, and public communication materials. Assumes up to nine meetings.

1.3 Agendas and Meeting Materials
Agendas will be distributed at least one business day prior, and meeting summaries with action items will be provided within five business days.

1.4 Public and Council Meetings
RICK will assist and participate in public, commission, and City Council presentations, providing maps, graphics, exhibits, and speaking support to communicate project
outcomes. Assumes up to two meetings.

1.5 Project Tracking and File Management
Monthly progress memorandums, schedule updates, and
invoicing will be provided. All project data, models, GIS files, and supporting documentation will be maintained in a clear directory structure accessible to the City.

1.6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
QA/QC reviews will be conducted prior to each City
submittal to ensure consistency across GIS inventory,
model conditions, cost estimates, and CIP prioritizations.

Deliverables:
• Project Work Plan and Schedule
• Kick-Off Meeting Materials and Summary
• Progress Meeting Agendas and Minutes
• Monthly Progress Memoranda and Invoices
• QA/QC Review Log (GIS, H&H, and CIP deliverables)
• Public/Council Presentation Support Materials
City Benefits:
• No learning curve: Our long history with Murrieta
eliminates onboarding delays.
• Low City workload: RICK structures communication
and reviews to minimize staff burden.
• Predictability: Transparent schedule and progress
reporting prevents surprises.
• Confidence in outcomes: Built-in QA/QC ensures a
consistent, defensible Plan.
• Better communication to leadership and public: Clear
maps and briefing materials support approvals and
project funding discussions.

TASK 2: RESEARCH, DATA COLLECTION,

AND COMPILATION
This task develops the verified drainage system inventory forming the analytical foundation for hydrology, hydraulics, and CIP development. Murrieta’s system, consisting of
approximately 5,600 pipe and channel segments (≈ 340,000 LF) and 4,000 associated structures, spans multiple ADP basins including Warm Springs, Cole Canyon, and Murrieta Creek. Our approach emphasizes confidence tracking,
prioritization of high-consequence assets, and creation of a model-ready, maintainable GIS dataset that supports future City updates and long-term asset management.

2.1 Compile Available Drainage System Data
RICK will compile available information including ADP/MDP maps, as-built drawings, FEMA mapping, General Plan
land use data, USGS soils and topography, aerial imagery, and existing City GIS layers to establish a unified baseline dataset. Data will be referenced and stored in a format compatible with the City’s GIS environment, including
standardized feature classes, domains, and metadata.

Data sources will include the RCFC&WCD ADPs (Warm
Springs, Santa Gertrudis, and Murrieta Creek), historical master plan data, FEMA FIRM layers, and the City’s GIS
and CAD records. Each dataset will be cataloged with
source date and reliability rating to initiate Confidence Level tracking.

2.2 Existing Infrastructure Digitization and As-Built
Verification
RICK understands the importance of compiling accurate
data for the success of the SDMP project. After a data
request was submitted, the City stated it does not maintain an existing spatial dataset for the City’s storm drain and MS4 features. Through review of publicly available data obtained through City of Murrieta ArcGIS online portal, RICK was able to locate preliminary storm drain infrastructure spatial data that will be leveraged during the digitization efforts. RICK will compile and digitize existing record plans and as-builts to compliment existing data and produce a spatially-connected dataset of the City’s existing drainage infrastructure. Based on responses from the City, an
estimated 90 percent of the system will have available record plans. The digitization efforts will focus on both spatial and non-spatial (geometry, material, size, etc.) data gathered from review of the provided record documents. Datasets
448
15 will be cataloged with feature source, confidence, as-built date, datum, and other fields as requested through close coordination with City staff and regional partners to ensure compatibility with existing data systems. Digitization efforts will be focused on critical, large diameter infrastructure (36 inches and greater), and facilities with slopes less than 1.0 percent, as presented in available data compiled by RICK.

Assumptions regarding facility depth and invert elevations may be made for smaller diameter facilities with slopes greater than 2.0 percent.

2.3 Identify Critical Missing or Incorrect Data
Based on responses from the City, an estimated 10 percent of the system is missing record plan information, so
identifying crucial facilities lacking appropriate data will be instrumental to project success. RICK will identify missing pipe sizes, invert elevations, materials, and connectivity issues and document each in a Data Gap Matrix that clearly indicates where supplemental research or verification may be warranted. This matrix becomes a communication tool
for both modeling and future asset management planning.

Each data gap will be recorded in a Data Gap Matrix linking specific asset IDs to missing attributes (size, invert, material) and proposed verification method (desktop, field, CCTV).

2.4 Identify Missing Infrastructure
RICK will use aerial imagery, street-level review, and
network tracing to confirm system connectivity and identify unmapped or undocumented storm drain infrastructure
required to complete the system record. Missing or uncertain features will be flagged for classification under Confidence Level ratings.

The team will leverage drainage boundary tracing in GIS to locate discontinuities between mapped and inferred
systems, particularly at jurisdictional interfaces with RCFC&WCD facilities and Caltrans rights-of-way.

2.5 As-Built Verification and Confidence-Based Field
Validation
RICK will leverage drainage boundary tracing in GIS to locate discontinuities between mapped and inferred systems,
particularly at jurisdictional interfaces with RCFC&WCD facilities and Caltrans rights-of-way.

All verified assets will be assigned a Confidence Level (High, Moderate, Low) within the GIS schema, based on source
and verification type (e.g., field-measured, record plan, inferred). These fields, Spatial Source, Spatial Confidence, and Attribute Confidence, allow City staff to visualize data reliability directly within ArcGIS (assumes review of 150 As- Built Plan Sheets).

Field verification efforts are limited to the activities defined in the Priority Matrix and are capped at up to ten (10) field- verification days unless otherwise authorized by the City.

CCTV inspection is considered an optional, City-approved task and will only be performed if directed; for budgeting purposes, we have assumed up to ten (10) days of on-
call CCTV support through RICK’s established inspection partner.

2.6 Compile GIS Data and Assemble Inventory
Database
Following priority verification, the GIS inventory will be updated to a Model-Ready condition, meaning:
• Network connectivity is complete
• Backbone conveyance geometry and elevations are
verified
• Confidence Levels are assigned and documented for
all features
Once these updates are complete, the drainage GIS will
be formally designated Model-Ready, meaning the system
reflects verified conveyance pathways, elevations, and data confidence appropriate for hydraulic evaluation.

This verified database will then integrate directly with the Task 3 PCSWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model, helping
ensure that modeling results represent the built environment rather than inferred or assumed conditions.

Deliverables:
• Consolidated drainage data library
• Data Gap Matrix identifying missing or uncertain
attributes
• Priority Matrix for Field Verification and As-Built
Digitization
• Field Verification Prioritization Map and Log
• Confidence Level Rating incorporated into GIS dataset • GIS Storm Drain Inventory Geodatabase with full
metadata documentation
Priority level Asset Focus Field Verification Approach
High City-owned trunk mains, major culverts, major
crossings, detention basins
Verify before modeling using as-built review, spot
survey, or CCTV as applicable
Moderate Local collector lines with moderate influence on hydraulic grade
Verify selectively if modeling shows sensitivity
Low Laterals or structures with minimal capacity effect Verification is resource dependent; Confidence Level documented
City of Menifee Dashboard
449
16 City Benefits:
• Establishes one authoritative drainage system dataset • Focuses field verification where it has maximum
hydraulic and CIP value
• Ensures trunk and high-consequence conveyance
assets are fully understood
• Reduces cost by avoiding unnecessary field work and
digitization
• Produces a model-ready and maintenance-ready GIS
system
• Creates transparency in data certainty to support future planning and budgeting
TASK 3: EXISTING CONDITION

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC

ANALYSIS AND MODELING
This task develops the citywide hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) model using the verified, Model-Ready drainage GIS.

Before modeling begins, RICK will meet with the City to review available hydrologic and hydraulic methodologies, confirm RCFC&WCD compliance needs, and jointly select
the approach that best aligns with the City’s goals. RICK has extensive experience delivering H&H models under
RCFC&WCD standards, ADP/MDP methodologies, and
citywide master-planning frameworks, and will ensure the agreed-upon method is compliant, reliable, and appropriate for long-term City use.

Although SWMM itself was excluded in the City’s Q&A,
PCSWMM can be configured to fully apply RCFC&WCD
hydrology, including District-standard rainfall patterns, loss parameters, routing assumptions, and unit hydrograph
methods. RICK recommends a PCSWMM-based approach
that incorporates these RCFC&WCD requirements while
enabling 2D overland flow, providing a practical and
compliant “best-of-both-worlds” solution.

This method improves upon traditional ADP/MDP
hydrology by enabling evaluation of how local infrastructure constraints, roadway grading, inlet capacity, and overland flow paths influence system performance, producing a
more complete understanding of actual conditions within Murrieta’s built environment allowing for better allocation of resources during CIP development.

3.1 Compile Hydrologic Data and Generate
Subcatchments
RICK will generate subcatchments using updated terrain
data and the verified GIS. Based on the City’s ~1,854 catch basins and 156 inlets, the model will include approximately 2,000–2,100 subcatchments, providing an appropriate
level of detail for localized and basin-level hydrology.

Hydrologic inputs will be fully aligned with RCFC&WCD
methodology, including:
• District-standard loss rates and infiltration parameters • Unit hydrograph parameters consistent with applicable ADP/MDP basins
• Runoff coefficients derived from RCFC&WCD land-use
categories
• Routing, roughness, and depression storage values
consistent with District practice
Design storms will use RCFC&WCD rainfall distributions
and IDF curves. NOAA Atlas 14 may be referenced for
cross-checks and potential incorporation.

3.2 Existing Condition Hydrologic and Hydraulic Model
RICK will construct a 1D/2D PCSWMM model that
incorporates:
• 1D pipe and channel hydraulics from the verified GIS
• 2D overland flow computation to represent roadway
ponding, surface flow routes, and drainage relief paths • Dual drainage behavior between surface and
subsurface systems
Model simulations will evaluate the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events, with the 100-year event used as the primary basis for deficiency mapping and CIP development.

While PCSWMM is not listed by the District, its hydrology and routing configuration will be structured to match
RCFC&WCD methodology, ensuring regional consistency
while providing enhanced representation of local flow
behavior, particularly where overland relief and roadway grading influence drainage.

Calibration will reference
available observations,
maintenance history, and
field-verified constraints.

Model results will map
surcharge locations,
roadway flooding, ponding,
and overland flow pathways
under existing conditions.

Deliverables:
• Subcatchment maps and hydrology tables
• All PCSWMM model files
• Technical memo summarizing methodology and
assumptions
• Existing condition hydraulic performance and deficiency exhibits
City Benefits:
• Subcatchment-level hydrology tied to actual inlet
distribution
• 2D modeling provides improved understanding of
roadway flooding and overland flow behavior
• Transparent, updateable model supporting future CIP
planning and grant applications
• Modeling results reflect verified infrastructure conditions from Task 2
TASK 4: RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS
(CIP DEVELOPMENT)
This task converts modeling results into a defensible,
fundable set of drainage improvements. We pair hydraulic performance, system condition, and cost considerations
to develop a clear roadmap for near-term and long-term
investment. Detailed concept development and refinement City of Menifee
450
17 is assumed for up to ten (10) representative CIP projects, developed in coordination with City staff.

4.1 Identify Existing Deficiencies and Improvements
RICK will size deficient pipes and culverts citywide,
not only those elevated into the formal CIP list, to give Murrieta a comprehensive understanding of system needs.

Improvements may include upsizing, parallel relief systems, new inlets, channel modifications, or localized overland conveyance enhancements. This full sizing effort provides a transparent, systemwide view of drainage needs beyond the selected focus projects.

4.2 Identify Missing Proposed Improvements
RICK will identify and conceptually size new conveyance or capture facilities where system gaps, missing links, or ADP-referenced improvements limit performance.

Recommendations will reference RCFC&WCD ADP/MDP
guidance where applicable.

4.3 Identify Multi-Benefit and Water Quality
Opportunity Sites
RICK will screen the drainage network and publicly owned parcels to identify up to ten (10) locations where regional water-quality, trash-capture, or multi-benefit stormwater improvements may be feasible. These opportunity areas
will be documented in GIS and incorporated into the Web Viewer to support future grant pursuit and CIP coordination.

4.4 Prepare Opinion of Probable Construction Costs
Unit costs will be developed based on recent regional
bid history and RICK’s comparable work in surrounding
jurisdictions. All sized pipes, including structures not developed into standalone CIP projects, will be assigned planning-level costs, giving the City a clear view of
potential future obligations and opportunities for proactive reinvestment.

4.5 Prioritize Improvements Using a Scoring Matrix
RICK will apply a prioritization matrix based on hydraulic deficiency, consequence of failure, flood risk reduction, constructability, equity, and maintenance implications.

The scoring process allows clear communication to City
leadership and the public and provides a foundation for future budget cycles.

RICK will deliver:
• 5-Year near-term CIP (implementation-ready)
• 20-Year long-range program with costs

4.6 Identify Funding Sources
RICK will identify and summarize funding pathways for
each project type, including:
• FEMA BRIC and Hazard Mitigation Assistance
• CalOES grant programs
• SWRCB SRF
• IRWM funding opportunities
• RCFC&WCD or regional cost-sharing
• Federal infrastructure programs and resiliency funding Project scoring will incorporate grant competitiveness
factors, helping the City prioritize improvements that
can leverage outside funding. Where applicable, we will identify multi-benefit stormwater projects that support flood reduction, and multi benefit compliance, strengthening
grant viability.

Deliverables:
• Citywide list of deficient facilities with conceptual sizing • GIS layer of up to ten (10) multi-benefit/water-quality opportunity locations incorporated into final GIS and
Web Viewer Planning-level unit costs and project-level
estimates
• Prioritization matrix and scoring results
• 5-Year CIP and 20-Year Long-Range Program
• Funding and grant opportunity summary
City Benefits:
• Clear understanding of both immediate and long-range
drainage needs
• Transparent prioritization process grounded in hydraulic benefit and risk reduction
• Strategic positioning for competitive grant funding
• Planning-level costs that inform future budget and
impact-fee updates
TASK 5: DEVELOP THE STORM DRAIN

MASTER PLAN
This task compiles all verified data, modeling results, and improvement recommendations into a clear, actionable
Storm Drain Master Plan supported by an intuitive Web GIS Viewer.

5.1 Compile GIS and Modeling Results into Web-
Based Viewer
RICK will compile SDMP data, including drainage
inventory, modeling results, flooding extents, and CIP
recommendations, into a secure, GIS web application that can be transferred into the City’s AGOL account.

This goes beyond RFP requirements by enabling:
• Interactive viewing of improvement projects
• On-screen review of model extents and flow paths
• Department-to-department collaboration without
specialized software
451
18 5.2 Prepare Draft Storm Drain Master Plan
RICK will prepare the Draft SDMP consistent with the City’s specified structure and content requirements, including:
• Summary of methods, assumptions, inputs, and results
from Tasks 1–4
• Documentation of system deficiencies and improvement
needs
• Citywide mapping of drainage infrastructure, flooding extents, and basin conditions
• Tables and graphics supporting inventory, hydrology,
hydraulics, and CIP components
• High-level permitting, utility, and constructability
considerations
Enhancements beyond the RFP:
• Integrated Confidence Level maps to support future
updates
• Basin-level summaries aligned with Warm Springs, Cole Canyon, and Santa Gertrudis watershed boundaries
• Inclusion of 2D overland flow results for visualizing surface flooding pathways
RICK will provide the Draft SDMP in PDF format for City review, along with all supporting GIS data and model files.

5.3 Final SDMP
Following City review, RICK will refine the SDMP to
incorporate comments and provide:
• Finalized documentation aligned with the RFP-required content
• Updated maps, figures, and improvement
recommendations
• Final GIS geodatabase and PCSWMM model package
(1D/2D)
Enhancement:
• A clearly organized appendix structure for technical
data, submittal-ready for council adoption and future
grant applications.

5.4 O&M Best Practices Memo
RICK will prepare a concise memo outlining maintenance, inspection, and asset-management recommendations for
City-owned storm drain infrastructure. This memo fulfills the RFP requirement for operations guidance while adding:
• Condition and Confidence-based maintenance
prioritization
• Recommendations for future field verification
sequencing
• Integration with the City’s existing MS4/NPDES
programs
Deliverables:
• Draft and Final SDMP (PDF and editable formats)
• Web GIS Viewer and Instructions
• All GIS and Model Files (fully documented)
• O&M / Inspection Best Practices Memo
• Council/Commission Presentation Support
City Benefits:
• Produces a practical, usable SDMP
• Web GIS Viewer allows staff to explore and present
results without specialized software
• Plan is ready for implementation and grant pursuit
• Documented methodology ensures future updates are
low-cost
OPTIONAL TASK A: CCTV FIELD

INSPECTIONS
Based on the field research and prioritization of City-owned facilities performed in previous tasks, the RICK team will perform CCTV inspection on high-rick, or unknown-condition segments of City-Owned drainage facilities.

A.1 CCTV Inspection and PACP Condition Grading
The results of previous system research and Tasks will
inform the optional CCTV efforts. RICK will coordinate with a subconsultant to conduct targeted CCTV inspections
of high-risk or unknown-condition segments (e.g., known O&M locations, CMP), and assign PACP condition ratings
to each. Rick will prioritize evaluation of the City-owned and maintained infrastructure with a diameter of 18-inches and larger with exceptions for critical connections of smaller diameter and differing ownership to better facilitate creation of critical CIP drainage improvement recommendations.

Note: CCTV inspection scope will be defined based on
the number of days the CCTV crew will be in the field
and agreed upon with the City at project initiation. For scoping purposes, it is assumed that twenty (10) days of CCTV inspection will be completed. Additional footage or inspection rounds may require a scope amendment.

OPTIONAL TASK B: ADDITIONAL AS-

BUILT PLAN DIGITIZATION
Based on the review and digitization of available as-built plans for critical infrastructure, this optional task will provide additional as-built digitization efforts for facilities outside the scope of the original assumptions in Task 2.

B.1 Additional As-Built Data Digitization (T&M NTE)
This optional task expands the baseline scope to further enhance the storm drain model beyond what would be
strictly necessary for the Master Plan model development.

If the City elects to more fully develop existing conditions of their drainage facilities, RICK will digitize additional as- built plan information including invert elevations, depth, slope, size, for features outside what is prioritized in Task 2 assumptions, improving network accuracy and connectivity.

Work will be closely coordinated with City staff to identify priority areas, integrate new features into the GIS database, and ensure the model reflects the most complete and
accurate representation of existing infrastructure.
452
19 Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures
The RICK team brings extensive experience delivering
public agency projects all across Riverside County and
includes completing projects directly performed for the City. This experience yields a thorough understanding
of the processes of working with Agency Departments
including public works/engineering, parks & Recreation
and development services.

We are also experienced with the regulations, processes, and personnel of various public agencies, including the City of Tustin, City of Orange, City of Anaheim, Orange County Flood Control District, Caltrans, Orange County Transit Authority and other key municipalities. Our familiarity with public works goes beyond the lead agencies to include
significant experience with other local agencies and
stakeholders, such as the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), and Southern California Edison, which will be invaluable when coordinating with project stakeholders.

RICK stays on the forefront of interpreting and implementing local agency regulations and standards. Our local
experience and familiarity provide significant value to clients and project stakeholders. Our project team members live in these communities and strive to prepare designs that reflect the local history, culture, and personality while maintaining client objectives, budgets, and schedules.

RICK has performed dozens of local projects within the
Riverside County Region, including for the Cities of Murrieta, Menifee, Temecula, Hemet, Wildomar, and Riverside County.

Through this experience, we have practical knowledge of regulations and standards as well as established, mutually beneficial relationships with local regulatory agencies and key project stakeholders Southern California Edison, SoCal Gas Company, and industry organizations like AWWA,
APWA, and others. Additionally, we are experienced with the regulations, processes, and personnel of various state and federal agencies, including Caltrans, California State Water Resources Control Board, FEMA, and FHWA. This agency
knowledge and experience provides significant value as
it allows us to successfully act on a moment’s notice to provide guidance and expertise, facilitate engineering
design services, and address citizen concerns to meet
critical project deadlines.

WE HAVE WORKED & COLLABORATED WITH LOCAL AGENCIES INCLUDING:

WHY THE RICK TEAM FOR THE CITY OF MURRIETA
Proven Track Record: Successfully delivered over 20 SDMPs in the last 10 years across Southern California.

Versatile Modeling Expertise: Proficient in all major modeling platforms; our 1D/2D models create clear, visual tools that help City leadership and the community understand drainage issues and solutions.

Integrated In-House Team: All GIS, modeling, QA/QC, and CIP development performed by RICK staff, no external dependencies for core tasks, ensuring efficiency, consistency, and schedule reliability.

Regulatory & Basin Familiarity: Deep understanding of MS4/NPDES programs and regional watersheds, allowing us to quickly align recommendations with local and regional requirements.

User-Ready Tools: GIS-integrated deliverables and a Web Viewer allow staff to easily apply, update, and communicate SDMP results without specialized software.

Strategic Funding Alignment: CIP recommendations packaged to support eligibility under federal, state, and regional grant programs.
453
20 maps, making
complex technical
data accessible to
a broad audience.

These innovations
improve decision-
making, streamline
plan development,
and support long-
term infrastructure
strategies.

WMP 2D Mesh Resolution
Sample Exhibits
RICK consistently works to advance
the efficiency and quality of the DMP/
SDMP development process by
working collaboratively with software
developers and developing unique
tools and strategies to provide
ever-improving master plans for our
clients. Here are examples of the
high-resolution modeling capabilities
and time-lapse inundation videos
that provide clear visual impacts,
facilitating stakeholder understanding.
2D Inundation Time Lapse
Web Applications
To enhance collaboration and transparency, RICK provides an interactive web application throughout the project’s duration.

This tool allows City staff to track progress, review data, provide feedback, and explore custom features tailored to project needs. Our approach includes visually impactful tools such as time-lapse inundation videos and detailed exhibit

1. Fully connected citywide GIS inventory accessible
in an easy-to-use web-application

3. One-click access to H&H results (per asset)

5. Dashboard visualizing Storm Drain Asset Conditions

4. Delineation tool to efficiently view total contributing area

6. Document Management System with Live Linked
As-Builts to GIS data

2. Clear results with visible inundation limits and
affected structures
454
21 Appendix
455
I
\ Key Personnel
Brendan Hastie PE, LEED AP
Principal-in-Charge
Brendan is a Principal at RICK where he manages a design team for preparing hydrologic, hydraulic, and water quality treatment analyses and design. Brendan has experience in a variety of water resources projects including H&H analysis, drainage design, flood plain studies, erosion and sediment control, hydromodification management, low impact development (LID), and water quality treatment facilities.

He has prepared and processed projects through various municipal agencies throughout the San Diego and Riverside region, and resource agencies including the RWQCB, the USACE, CDFW, and FEMA. He is very familiar with drainage design requirements, including variable H&H criteria, and he has prepared studies and designs ranging from the conceptual phase to final engineering, including plans, specifications, and cost estimates. He has managed similar DMPs for the County of San Diego, and Cities of Menifee, Carlsbad, San Marcos, Lemon Grove, and San Diego.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Menifee Drainage Master Plan, Menifee, CA: Brendan is serving as Principal- in-Charge/Project Manager for this project, working closely with the City in developing an DMP that will include a fully connected existing condition storm drain system, recommended improvements with a proposed condition model, bundled projects with opinion of probable construction cost, and identified regional improvement opportunities.

Rainbow Creek Watershed Implementation Plan, San Diego, CA: This Implementation Plan was prepared to achieve TMDL compliance within the Rainbow region of the Santa Margarita watershed of the County of San Diego.

Efforts included compiling and correcting the existing inventory, identifying priority outfalls, and creating a 1D/2D H&H model to determine potential drainage impacts on proposed structural BMPs. The work aimed to provide improved water quality benefits without negatively impacting flood conditions and culminated in six final Preliminary Engineering Reports (PERs). Brendan served as Principal-in-Charge.

Lemon Grove Drainage Master Plan, Lemon Grove, CA: Brendan served as Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for this project, where he assessed the drainage components of the DMP by utilizing high-resolution spatial datasets to generate detailed H&H models. A holistic modeling program was used to prepare models for the 2, 10, and 100-Year (24-Hour) storm events for over five square miles of the City.

Additional Master Plan Project Experience:

Chollas Creek Watershed Master Plan, San Diego, CA
San Marcos Drainage Master Plan, San Marcos, CA

EXPERIENCE
24 Years

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
Pennsylvania State
University

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil
Engineer in CA, No.
65809

LEED AP

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
American Public Works
Association (APWA)
California Storm Water
Quality Association
(CASQA)
Floodplain Management
Association (FMA)
Consultation Panel
Member for Water
Quality Improvement
Plan (WQIP) for San
Diego River
456
II
\ Key Personnel
Andrew Thies CFM
Project Manager
Andrew is a Principal Water Resources Manager at RICK. He has experience in every aspect of the drainage infrastructure lifecycle from planning, design, inventory development, condition assessment, and master plan modeling of the built environment. He has worked closely with H&H modeling developers to develop cutting edge approaches to H&H modeling and assessment on over 20 SDMPs throughout California. He is experienced in the use of a variety of modeling software’s and has dedicated his career to solving the challenging drainage problems of municipal clients throughout California. His experience in GIS-based master planning extends from 1D storm drain modeling of backbone systems to high resolution 1D/2D dynamically connected storm drain and surface conveyance modeling to the inlet scale and multiple variations in-between.

Andrew has also recently given SDMP presentations at FMA and CASQA annual conferences.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Lemon Grove Drainage Master Plan, Lemon Grove, CA: Andrew assessed the drainage components of the DMP by utilizing high- resolution spatial datasets to generate detailed H&H models. A holistic modeling program was used to prepare models for the 2, 10, and 100- Year (24-Hour) storm events for over five square miles of the City. Comprehensive storm drain condition assessment using CCTV with NASCO PACP scoring and a web-application for easy access to data for the City.

Menifee Drainage Master Plan, Menifee, CA: Andrew assisted the City of Menifee in developing an DMP that included a fully connected existing condition storm drain system, recommended improvements with a proposed condition model, bundled projects with opinion of probable construction cost, and identified regional improvement opportunities. Follow-on tasks included a comprehensive inspection plan development for all culverts with condition and maintenance recommendations presenting in an easy to use GIS based dashboard for progress tracking.

Citywide Waterway Naturalization Feasibility Study, Agoura Hills, CA Paso Robles SDMP Update, Paso Robles, CA
Carlsbad DMP Update, Carlsbad, CA
City of San Diego Individual Drainage Engineering Assessments, San Diego, CA • San Diego Bay Watershed
• San Diego River Watershed
• South Mission Beach Community
San Marcos Drainage Master Plan, San Marcos, CA
Vista Drainage Master Plan, Vista, CA
Rainbow Creek Watershed Implementation Plan, County of San Diego, CA Chico Storm Water Master Plan Update, Chico, CA

EXPERIENCE
11 Years

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
San Diego State
University

REGISTRATION
ASFPM Certified
Floodplain Manager, No.

US-17-09950

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
American Public Works
Association (APWA) -
Golf Tournament Co-
Chair
California Stormwater
Quality Association
(CASQA)
Floodplain Management
Association (FMA)
457
III
\ Key Personnel
Venkat Gummadi PE QSD/P CPESC
QA / QC Manager & Techincal Advisor
Venkat Gummadi is an Associate Principal at RICK, with more than 16 years of professional experience focused on urban stormwater management. He specializes in stormwater best management practice (BMP) design, integrated stormwater watershed master planning, and incorporation of sustainability principals to deliver sustainable and resilient communities and infrastructure.

Venkat’s practice focuses on NPDES permitting; municipal stormwater program planning and implementation; integrated stormwater watershed master planning; stormwater BMP selection, design, and maintenance; sustainability planning, stormwater guidance manual development; drainage retrofi t designs to incorporate water quality treatment in the urban environment; and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) implementation planning.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
San Diego Regional Guidance Documents and Efforts, San Diego County, CA: The County of San Diego, on behalf of the San Diego County Copermittees, led development of plans and guidance manuals required to comply with 2013 Regional MS4 Permit adopted by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. Venkat was the technical lead/project manager for the following:

Model BMP Design Manual;
Watershed Management Area Analysis;
Water Quality Equivalency Guidance Document – Phase 2;
Report of Waste Discharge Review and Analysis; and
San Diego BMP Help Desk Support.

Storm Water Standards, San Diego, CA: The City of San Diego developed a Storm Water Standards manual that addresses, and provides guidance for complying with, during construction requirements and updated onsite post- construction storm water requirements. This manual provides updated procedures for planning, preliminary design, selection, and design of permanent storm water BMPs based on the performance standards presented in the 2013 MS4 Permit.

Venkat was the consultant team project manager for development of the 2016 and 2018 editions of the manual.

Stream Rehabilitation Credit Framework, San Diego, CA: The Regional MS4 permit provides an option to the City of San Diego to allow implementation of stream rehabilitation projects as an alternative compliance option for priority development projects, when implementation of the rehabilitation project will have greater overall water quality benefit for the watershed management area than fully complying with the performance requirements from the MS4 permit onsite. As the consultant team project manager, Venkat oversaw development of hydromodication management equivalency metrics for stream rehabilitation projects.

EXPERIENCE
16 Years

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
San Diego State
University
BS, Civil Engineering,
Gandhi Institute of
Technology and
Management (GITAM)

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer in
CA, No. 81958
QSD/P, No. 268
CPESC. No. 6027
458
IV
\ Key Personnel
Kevin McKinnon PE QSD/P
Hydrology And Hydraulics
Kevin McKinnon, PE, MBA, is an Associate Water Resources Project Engineer at RICK. He is a registered Civil Engineer in California with over 11 years of experience in land development and public works. Progressing from designer to project manager, he has led infrastructure projects, managed design teams, and overseen budgets and contracts. His expertise includes stormwater, sewer, and water infrastructure design, along with business operations and client relations. Proficient in Civil3D, AutoCAD, ArcGIS, and hydraulic analysis tools, he combines technical skills with strategic project oversight. Kevin manages water resource projects, tracks budgets, and leads design teams.

Previously, at Shasta County DPW, he oversaw grant- funded water and wastewater projects worth up to $7 million, ensuring compliance with state and federal regulations. His past work experiences strengthened his expertise in project design, team leadership, and municipal coordination. With a blend of technical and business acumen, Kevin excels in delivering high-quality engineering solutions while effectively managing project timelines, budgets, and stakeholder relationships. His experience spans both public and private sectors, driving successful infrastructure development.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
City of San Diego Stormwater Department, Auburn Trash Capture Devices, San Diego, CA: Kevin served as Project Engineer and managed design of regional trash capture devices for three (3) locations, tributary to Auburn Creek in San Diego to meet State of California “Trash Amendments” to the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California. He prepared hydraulic and hydrologic report in support of the project construction documents.

City of San Diego Stormwater Department, San Diego Bay IDEA, San Diego, CA: Kevin served as Project Engineer and worked with City statf and consultants to analyze drainage system discharging to San Diego Bay.

With team, identified system deficiencies and conceptual projects in improve system drainage and reduce flooding and inundation.

Shasta County Department of Public Works, Community Service Area (CSA) Grant Funded Projects, Shasta County, CA: Kevin served as Associate Engineer and managed four (4) grant-funded improvement projects for water and wastewater systems. Projects involved replacing aging infrastructure and upsizing systems to meet future demand. He managed subconsultants and contracts and coordinated with California funding agencies.

Additional Master Plan Project Experience:

Tustin Storm Drain Master Plan, Tustin, CA
Paso Robles Storm Drain Master Plan, Paso Robles, CA

EXPERIENCE
11 Years

EDUCATION
Master in Business
Administration,
San Diego State
University
BS, Civil and
Environmental
Engineering,
University of California,
Davis

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer in
CA, No. 90910
QSD/QSP, No. 27334
459
V
\ Key Personnel
Lukas Thompson PE, QSD/P
Hydrology And Hydraulics
Lukas is an Associate Water Resources Project Engineer with RICK and has over 8 years of civil engineering design experience in both public and private sectors with another 2 years of construction management and field exposure. Lukas has prepared CDP, building permit, grading permit, right of way and public improvement civil plans and technical reports on an array of different projects ranging from private single family residential developments to high-rise private residential and mixed-use sites, to County of San Diego CIP bridge projects. Lukas has an extensive background working on private and public projects within the County of San Diego. Lukas has a high level of expertise in post construction BMP design, involving stormwater biofiltration/ infiltration basins, underground storage pipes, and modular wetland systems.

His ability to accommodate and incorporate the desires and requests of a client into his design while still adhering to technical design standards and requirements of municipalities is why clients continue to enjoy working with him project after project.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
City of Paso Robles – Storm Drain Master Plan: Civil Engineer/Modeling Designer/Project Manager - Rick is currently preparing a Citywide SDMP for the city of Paso Robles utilizing PCSWMM. RICK has extensively been collaborating with the city in updating the GIS network of their complete storm drain inventory through data gap analysis and field reconnaissance attribute obtaining. RICK has mapped their storm drain network and incorporated the GIS based system into PCSWMM for 1D and 2D modeling analyses. The combined 1D to 2D model approach generates more realistic results which helps better identify existing storm drain network deficiencies and prepares a more accurate existing condition to then generate proposed condition modeling and propose future CIP improvements. RICK will then produce cost estimates for each of recommended CIP projects.

County of San Diego CIP, Sycamore Bridge Project, Vicinity of San Marcos: Civil Engineer – Working in conjunction with the County’s adjunct statf structural engineer, worked as the lead civil designer in preparation of the County’s 30%/70% plan package and lead the County team in design coordination meetings and discussions with adjacent stakeholders such as the City of San Marcos. Prepared the overall roadway design of the project as well as the project’s green street SWQMP.

County of San Diego CIP, 13th Street Bridge Project, Vicinity of Ramona:

Civil Engineer – Working in conjunction with the County’s adjunct statf structural engineer, worked as the lead civil designer in preparation of the County’s 70% revised plan package per Caltrans’s bridge and roadway design required modifications. Redesigned portions of roadway approaches, reconfigured the project’s intersection design, and reworked/verified the project’s overall green street 70% design SWQMP.

EXPERIENCE
10 Years

EDUCATION
BS, Civil and
Environmental
Engineering, University
of Washington

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer in
CA, No. 91870
QSD/QSP, No. 27871
460
VI
\ Key Personnel
Bavya Vuppalapati EIT
Water Resources Engineering
Bavya Vuppalapati is a Principal Water Resources Designer at the San Diego office of RICK. She has experience across a wide range of water resources projects including hydrologic and hydraulic analysis, drainage and water quality design, and watershed master planning. She has extensive experience in using a combination of GIS and PCSWMM to develop drainage master plan models of varying resolution and type. Her experience in PCSWMM based master planning extends from 1-Dimensional storm drain modeling of backbone systems to high resolution 1D-2D dynamically connected storm drain and surface conveyance modeling to the inlet scale and multiple in- between.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Chollas Creek Watershed Master Plan, San Diego, CA: As Assistant Designer, Bavya assisted with storm drain inventory data corrections, H&H model setup, storm drain facility recommendations, and report preparation.

The project included utilizing high-resolution spatial datasets to generate detailed H&H models.

Drainage Master Plan, City of San Marcos, CA: Bavya helped prepare a Citywide DMP for the City of San Marcos utilizing PCSWMM in her role as Assistant Designer. Existing city-owned drainage facilities were identified, mapped, and incorporated into a GIS-based PCSWMM model for analysis.

Integrated Winter Gardens Drainage Plan, County of San Diego, CA: RICK prepared a comprehensive drainage plan for the County of San Diego aimed at identifying opportunities for water quality improvements while factoring in the need to improve flood control infrastructure. A 2D model was developed that identified opportunities or water quality and flood control improvements.

Bavya served as Assistant Designer.

Maple Canyon Restoration - Phase I, San Diego, CA: Bavya, as Assistant Designer, helped prepare H&H analysis as well as analysis and design of storm drain and outfall structures for all 13 systems. This project included 15 distinct drainage systems in an urban environment discharging into 13 outfalls in an open space canyon.

EXPERIENCE
9 Years

EDUCATION
MS, Water Resources
Engineering, San Diego
State University

REGISTRATION
Engineer in Training in
CA, No. 176429

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
San Diego County
Engineering Council
(SDCEC)
461
VII
\ Key Personnel
Callum McRae EIT
Water Resources Engineering
Callum McRae is a Water Resources Designer at RICK. He studied environmental engineering as an undergraduate student and civil engineering with an emphasis in water resources as a graduate student, both at SDSU.

During his time in San Diego State’s master’s program, he researched the removal of microplastics through bioretention soil media and presented his results at the annual CASQA conference in 2024. Callum’s educational background exemplifies his passion for water resources projects that benefit the environment as well as the people and communities within it. His work at Rick is focused on public programmatic projects including drainage master plans and stormwater asset mapping efforts to produce meaningful watershed level results that guide the selection of future drainage improvement projects and streamline asset management.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
County of San Diego Spring Walley Drainage Master Plan, Spring Valley, CA: As a Water Resources Designer, Callum worked to update the existing GIS inventory in the Spring Valley watershed and used the data to develop a hydrologic and hydraulic model in PCSWMM to assess current drainage conditions and produce future recommendations documented in the Drainage Master Plan report. The County of San Diego (County) Watershed Protection Program (WPP) has partnered with San Diego Coastkeeper (Coastkeeper) and the Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation (CERF) to conduct a Multi-Benefit Stormwater Management Planning Study (Planning Study) for the Spring Valley community. The goal of the Planning Study is to provide a demonstration of a holistic stormwater management framework that identifies a suite of strategies that address multiple planning needs, including water quality improvement, community enhancement, stormwater conveyance, and climate change resiliency.

City of San Diego San Diego Bay Watershed Management Area IDEAS, San Diego Bay, CA: Callum served as a Water Resources Designer and was responsible for editing storm drain inventory data to support hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of storm drain infrastructure throughout the San Diego Bay watershed management area. This task was performed primarily in PCSWMM.

San Diego State University, Oil and Grease Concentrations in Urban Runoff, San Diego, CA: Callum conducted manual grab sampling at multiple manholes and outlets through out SDSU campus parking lots to assist with data collection for a graduate research project. The project aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different sample collection techniques for monitoring oil and grease concentrations in urban stormwater. As part of this study, stormwater infrastructure responsible for collecting runoff from parking lots was prioritized for wet weather sampling.

EXPERIENCE
8 Years

EDUCATION
MS, Civil Engineering,
San Diego State
University
BS, Environmental
Engineering, San Diego
State University

REGISTRATION
Engineer in Training in
CA, No. 177286

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
California Stormwater
Quality Association
(CASQA)
462
VIII
\ Key Personnel
Chris Mattox PE
Water Resources Engineering
Christopher (Chris) Mattox is an Associate Project Manager in RICK’s Water Resources Division. Chris serves on a design team that prepares hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, drainage system design, water quality, trash capture devices, and hydromodification management designs for public works and private developments projects. He has extensive experience using continuous simulation models (i.e., Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) and San Diego BMP Sizing Spreadsheet) to analyze projects for compliance with Final Hydromodification Management Criteria. He has prepared numerous PDP SWQMPS, WQMPs, and HMPs and is skilled in the use of HEC-1, HEC-HMS, and the Rational Method for hydrologic modeling and basin routing, as well as HEC-RAS, and CivilGeo for hydraulic and sediment transport analysis.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Long Valley Wash and Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel Improvements, McMillan Communities, Temecula, CA: Chris served as Water Resources Lead Designer for the hydraulic design of the improvements for portions of Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash Channel in the City of Temecula for the Sommers Bend (Roripaugh Ranch) Development. This included value- engineering the designs specific to channel stabilization (i.e. – alternative slope stabilization materials for Santa Gertrudis Creek and drop structure design for Long Valley Wash). This also included preparing existing and proposed condition HEC-RAS hydraulic models for both channels (approximately 1,000 linear feet for Santa Gertrudis Creek and 5,500 linear feet for Long Valley Wash), including sediment transport (long-term) scour analysis for both channel improvements. Chris was also involved with as-needed support for the jurisdictional environmental permitting for both channels. Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel is now maintained by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District while the Long Valley Wash Channel was permitted by the City of Temecula and is privately maintained.

Ultimate Design and Construction of MDP Facility, Temecula, CA: Chris serves as the Water Resources Project Manager for the Sommers Bend project in the City of Temecula. This master planned community has over 1,000 residential units, two recreation centers, and a sports park that have all been constructed. There were several critical infrastructure improvements necessary to support the development of the site and were required prior to the issuance of building permits. An existing 72” MPD Line was designed and extended by the project to its ultimate alignment, along with construction of the associated headwall. This facility is now maintained by the RCFC District.

Additional Master Plan Project Experience:

Lennar Homes, Sevilla, French Valley, CA

EXPERIENCE
11 Years

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental
Engineering, North
Carolina University

REGISTRATION
Professional Engineer in
CA, No. 96303
Professional Engineer in
NC, No. 053039

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE)
American Public Works
Association (APWA)
463
IX
\ Key Personnel
Christian Atadero LSIT
Surveying / Mapping
Christian is an Assistant Survey Analyst at RICK. He graduated from California Baptist University in 2022 with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering. In the last five years he has worked as an intern, Chainman, Researcher, Surveyor Assistant, and Mapping Analyst, all at RICK. During his time at RICK, he has learned AutoCAD, MicroStation, and Bluebeam.

Working with a variety of people in all three departments: mapping, engineering, and survey has taught him teamwork and leadership skills.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
On-Call Services, Moreno Valley, CA: Christian served as an assistant surveyor for monument restoration and setting of street monuments and centerline ties throughout the City of Moreno Valley.

Kaiser Permanente, Ontario, CA: Christian served as an assistant surveyor where he assisted in establishing control and running a closed traverse on the fourth story to capture column locations for real building grid lines.

Pad K Future Hotel Site, Riverside, CA: Christian served as an assistant surveyor where he assisted in the shoring monitor of piles for the excavation center.

EXPERIENCE
7 Years

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering,
California Baptist
University University

REGISTRATION
Engineer in Training in
CA, No. 179101
Land Surveyor in
Training in CA, No. 9413
464
X
\ Key Personnel
Mikala Randich
GIS / Application Development
Mikala is a GIS Asset Manager at RICK’s San Diego office, brin ging her municipal, federal GIS, and asset management expertise to the company; she specializes in integrating spatial data and asset management software systems to efficiently analyze a range of assets, including stormwater infrastructure, roads, right-of-way, sidewalks, and additional campus infrastructure.

While creating successful end-to-end products for clients, Mikala utilizes efficient field data collection, technological data integrations, extensive support documentation, and seamless product delivery. Using ArcGIS Pro, Esri’s ArcGIS suite, and individual client unique asset management programs, Mikala supports clients with asset management planning and optimization through spatial analysis. She is collaborating with RICK’s Water Resources team to develop maintenance plan routes for efficient inspection of local pipelines, which will optimize public works vehicle routing and use inspection data to communicate maintenance recommendations via an interactive dashboard.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
City of San Diego, As-Needed GIS Support, San Diego, CA: Mikala is currently supporting the City by managing a task order to provide as-needed GIS services. Tasks performed under this include, as-built digitization, ownership research, inventory grouping to support inspections and maintenance, and updates to existing street sweeping GIS data to make it usable for navigation.

County of San Diego, Roadmap to Update MS4 GIS Inventory San Diego, CA:

Mikala is currently supporting the County in developing a GIS database schema for MS4 stormwater infrastructure, conducting plan document research in unincorporated areas, updating the GIS inventory, and documenting a detailed roadmap process to ensure an iterative and replicable process for the client for years to come.

City of Menifee Bridge/Culvert Inventory Study, Menifee, CA: This study created a condition assessment schema for approximately 160 culverts and 2 bridges, otfering valuable insights into maintenance needs and laying the foundation for informed asset management decision making for future improvements. The GIS team completed database design, workflow development, inventory of existing assets, managing field col- lection schedule and personnel, development of GIS based evaluation methods, preparing automated reporting and maintenance costs summaries, and GIS-based deliverables. Condition assessment analysis was performed to provide a score and maintenance recommendation for the evaluated assets. An analysis dashboard was created for City staff to easily filter and find assets most in need of maintenance or CIP efforts.

EXPERIENCE
8 Years

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental
Sciences, Florida State
University

REGISTRATION
Certified Stormwater
Plan Reviewer, No. 56
7 465
XI
\ Key Personnel
Sydney Rankmore RPP , MCIP
Funding Strategies
Sydney is an Associate Planner with RICK’s Planning + Design Division.

Sydney is a Registered Professional Planner (RPP) and Member of the Canadian Institute of Planning (MCIP). She recently relocated to San Diego from Western Canada, bringing valuable international experience and a unique perspective on local planning issues. Sydney has five years of community planning experience and is well-versed in policy development, strategic planning, and regulatory compliance.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
City of La Mesa, Downtown Village Specific Plan, La Mesa, CA:

Sydney is currently serving as Project Manager for the City of La Mesa Downtown Village Specific Plan Update, a focused planning initiative aimed at guiding future infill development, economic revitalization, and public realm improvements in the heart of La Mesa. This effort includes a detailed analysis of land use, mobility, economic development, and urban design strategies, supported by tailored community and stakeholder engagement. Sydney is responsible for overseeing all aspects of project delivery, including schedule tracking, coordination with City staff and subconsultants, and quality control of technical deliverables. She leads public engagement strategies—ranging from community workshops and stakeholder interviews to online tools and oversees the development of key documents including the existing conditions analysis, vision and guiding principles, land use alternatives, and design and mobility frameworks.

City of Vista, General Plan Update, Vista, CA: Sydney is currently serving as Project Manager for the City of Vista General Plan Update, a comprehensive and multi-yeareffort that will guide land use, housing, mobility, conservation, and quality of life in the City through 2050. The update includes development of General Plan elements, alternatives analysis, CEQA compliance, and a robust public engagement program. Her responsibilities include planning and facilitating public outreach events, guiding policy development in alignment with City Council priorities, managing technical teams and subconsultant partners, and ensuring clear communication across disciplines. Sydney’s leadership has been central to the project’s success in maintaining momentum, balancing technical accuracy with community input, and advancing a long-range vision that reflects Vista’s unique character and future opportunities.

City of Menifee, Innovation District Specific Plan, Menifee, CA:

Sydney is supporting the development of the City of Menifee Innovation District Specific Plan, which envisions a new, employment-focused district centered on advanced industries, research and development, and workforce housing.

The plan aims to transform a large, largely undeveloped area into a regional employment hub with a focus on flexibility, innovation, and sustainability.

Sydney contributes to the preparation of deliverables and supports the project team in shaping a comprehensive stakeholder and public engagement strategy. Her role includes participating in client and team coordination meetings, providing input on technical materials, and helping ensure that the Specific Plan reflects both community aspirations and the City’s long-term economic development goals.

EXPERIENCE
6 Years

EDUCATION
MA, Community and
Regional Planning,
University of British
Columbia BA,
Geography and
Planning, Queen’s
University

REGISTRATION
Registered Professional
Planner and Member of
the Canadian Institute of
Planning (RPP, MCIP)
International Association
of Public Participation
(IAP2)
466
01375.0001 962082.4 145610

EXHIBIT B
CO

NTRACT MODIFICATIONS
(Superseding Contract Boilerplate)

467
01375.0001 962082.4 145610

EXHIBIT C
S

CHEDULE OF COMPENSATION
I. T
he Scope of Work set forth herein shall be compensated for in the following manner:
☐ A single flat rate for all services as set forth in Exhibit “A.” ☒ Multiple flat rates for different specified services as set forth in Exhibit “A.” ☐ An hourly rate for some or all of the proposed services as set forth in Exhibit “A.” II. The total compensation for all Services shall not exceed the Contract Sum as provided in the Cover Page of this Agreement.

III. Consultant’s billing rates for any hourly Services are set forth in Exhibit “A .” In connection with the services provided pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, City will pay Consultant upon City’s receipt of a written invoice provided by Consultant no more than monthly. City will pay Consultant for work completed, billed in increments of six minutes (0.1 hours), not to exceed the Contract Sum. The City will reimburse the Consultant for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to performing services set forth in Exhibit “A” that are approved in advance in writing by the City such as mileage, copies, binding costs, postage, parking, travel, and lodging expenses as part of the not to exceed Contract Sum. To receive reimbursements, the Consultant must provide the City with a receipt and a description of the expense incurred along with the invoice. No mark up on expenses may be added.
468
01375.0001 962082.4
EX

HIBIT D
I

NSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
C
onsultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.

INIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
C
overage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. A
utomobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non-owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Wor
kers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (Not required if consultant provides written verification it has no employees)

4. P
rofessional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance appropriates to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate.

5. C
yber: Vendor/Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for security breaches, system failures, injuries to persons, damages to software, or damages to property (including computer equipment) which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Vendor, its agents, representatives, or employees. Vendor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance claims arising out of their services and including, but not limited to loss, damage, theft or other misuse of data, infringement of intellectual property, invasion of privacy and breach of data.

Cyber Liability Insurance, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Vendor in this agreement and shall include, but not be 469
01375.0001 962082.4
l
imited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses.

6. Technology Professional Liability Errors & Omissions (On ly if vendor is providing a technology service (data storage, website designers, etc.,) or product (software providers)
Technology Professional Liability Errors and Omissions Insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession and work hereunder, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by the Vendor in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses .
a. T
he Policy shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or information “property” of the Agency in the care, custody, or control of the Vendor.

I
f the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

O
ther Insurance Provisions
The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

A
dditional Insured Status
The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant's insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used).

P
rimary Coverage
For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant ’s insurance coverage shall be primary and non- contributory and at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City , its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance 470
01375.0001 962082.4
a
nd shall not contribute with it. This requirement shall also apply to any Excess or Umbrella liability policies.

U
mbrella or Excess Policy
The Consultant may use Umbrella or Excess Policies to provide the liability limits as required in this agreement. This form of insurance will be acceptable provided that all of the Primary and Umbrella or Excess Policies shall provide all of the insurance coverages herein required, including, but not limited to, primary and non- contributory, additional insured, Self -Insured Retentions (SIRs), indemnity, and defense requirements. The Umbrella or Excess policies shall be provided on a true “following form” or broader coverage basis, with coverage at least as broad as provided on the underlying Commercial General Liability insurance. No insurance policies maintained by the Additional Insureds, whether primary or excess, and which also apply to a loss covered hereunder, shall be called upon to contribute to a loss until the C onsultant’s primary and excess liability policies are exhausted.

N
otice of Cancellation
Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

Wai
ver of Subrogation
Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.

Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

S
elf-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City . The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City. The CGL and any policies, including Excess liability policies, may not be subje ct to a self -insured retention (SIR) or deductible that exceeds $25,000 [fill in the amount for your comfort level for the specific Consultant and job – it could be much higher, or in the case of a very small Consultant , you might want it lower] unless approved in writing by City. Any and all deductibles and SIRs shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant or subcontractor who procured such insurance and shall not apply to the Indemnified Additional Insured Parties. City may deduct from any amounts other wise due Consultant to fund the SIR/deductible. Policies shall NOT contain any self -insured retention (SIR) provision that limits the satisfaction of the SIR to the Named. The policy must also provide that Defense costs, including the Allocated Loss Adjustment Expenses, will satisfy the SIR or deductible. City reserves the right to obtain a copy of any policies and endorsements for verification.

A
cceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. 471
01375.0001 962082.4
C
laims Made Policies (note – should be applicable only to professional liability, see below) If any of the required policies provide claims-made coverage:

1. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

Verification of Coverage
Consultant shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsements Pages of the CGL and any Excess policies listing all policy endorsements. All certificates and endorsements and copies of the Declarations & Endorsements pages are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant ’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

Subcontractors
Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

Duration of Coverage
CGL & Excess liability policies for any construction related work, including, but not limited to, maintenance, service, or repair work, shall continue coverage for a minimum of 5 years for Completed Operations liability coverage. Such Insurance must be maintained, and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. 472

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A :

NAIC #
NAME:

CONTACT
(A/C, No):

FAX
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext):

PHONE

INSURED
REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR
WVD
ADDL
INSD

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $
$
$PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person)

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOSAUTOS ONLY

NON-OWNED

SCHEDULEDOWNED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
ER
OTH-

STATUTE
PER

LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EFF

POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR
INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE
$AGGREGATE
$
OCCUR

CLAIMS-MADE
DED RETENTION $
$PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$GENERAL AGGREGATE
$PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$MED EXP (Any one person)
$EACH OCCURRENCE

DAMAGE TO RENTED
$PREMISES (Ea occurrence)

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

POLICY PRO-

JECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

AUTOS ONLY
4/27/2026
Cavignac
451 A Street, Suite 1800
San Diego CA 92101
Certificate Department
619-744-0574
619-234-8601
[email protected]
XL Specialty Company
37885
RICKENG-01
Valley Forge Insurance Company
20508
Rick Engineering Company
5620 Friars Road
San Diego, CA 92110
Continental Casualty Co.
20443
Continental Insurance Company
35289
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
19038
1053138443
B
X
2,000,000
X
1,000,000
15,000
X
Separation of In
2,000,000
4,000,000
X
X
X
Y
Y
6076046485
1/1/2026
1/1/2027
4,000,000
Deductible
0 C
1,000,000
X
X
X
Y
Y
6076046499
1/1/2026
1/1/2027
D
X
X
9,000,000
6076046504
1/1/2026
1/1/2027
9,000,000
X
0 D
X
Y
WC 6 76046521
1/1/2026
1/1/2027
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
A
E
E
Professional Liability
Cyber Liability
Crime Liability
DPR5046952
105671660
105671660
8/15/2025
8/15/2025
8/15/2025
8/15/2026
8/15/2026
8/15/2026
Each Claim/Aggregate
Limit
Limit
$5M/$10M
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
Re: Project No. 21-446, Storm Drain Master Plan, Project No. 21-446 / CIP 19002. Additional Insured coverage applies to General Liability and Automobile Liability for The City of Murrieta, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers per policy form. Waiver of subrogation applies to General Liability, Automobile Liability, and Workers Compensation per policy form. Primary coverage applies to General Liability and Automobile Liability per policy form. Excess/Umbrella policy follows form over underlying policies: General Liability, Auto Liability & Employers Liability (additional insured and waiver of subrogation apply when afforded on underlying policies). Professional Liability - Claims made form, defense costs included within limit. If the insurance company elects to cancel or non-renew coverage for any reason other than nonpayment of premium they will provide 30 days notice of such cancellation or nonrenewal. General Liability Deductible $0. Auto Physical Damage: $1,000 Comprehensive & Collision Deductibles. Workers Compensation Deductible $0. Professional Liability Deductible $250,000.

City of Murrieta
One Town Square
Murrieta CA 92562
473
4
474
/0/1/2/0/1/2/3/0/3/401/01/2026
475
/Caa/C34/C22/C20/C28/C3b/C21/C6d/C36/C5a/C38/Ca4/Ca5/C35/C2f/Cab/Cac/Cac/Cac

&1$3$5$02817
6076046485
15 The Continental Insurance Co. 10/21/2024
Rick Engineering Company
%ODQNHW$GGLWLRQDO,QVXUHG2ZQHUV/HVVHHVRU&RQWUDFWRUV ZLWK3URGXFWV&RPSOHWHG2SHUDWLRQV&RYHUDJH(QGRUVHPHQW &1$
;;

3ROLF\1R

3DJHRI (QGRUVHPHQW1R

(IIHFWLYH'DWH

,QVXUHG1DPH

&RS\ULJKW&1$$OO5LJKWV5HVHUYHG
/C41/C42/C43/C44/C45/C46/C47/C48/C49
/C4a/C4b/C4c/C4d/C4e
7KLVHQGRUVHPHQWPRGLILHVLQVXUDQFHSURYLGHGXQGHUWKHIROORZLQJ

&200(5&,$/*(1(5$//,$%,/,7<&29(5$*(3$57
,WLVXQGHUVWRRGDQGDJUHHGDVIROORZV

/C49/C2e /C57/C48/C4f/C20/C49/C53/C20/C41/C4e/C20/C49/C4e/C53/C55/C52/C45/C44/C20 LVDPHQGHGWRLQFOXGHDVDQ
/C49/C6e/C73/C75/C72/C65/C64
DQ\SHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQZKRP\RXDUHUHTXLUHGE\
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74 WRDGGDVDQDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGRQWKLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74
EXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWROLDELOLW\IRU
/C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79
/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79

/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79/C20/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65 RU
/C70/C65/C72/C73/C6f/C6e/C61/C6c/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C61/C64/C76/C65/C72/C74/C69/C73/C69/C6e/C67/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79 FDXVHGLQZKROHRULQSDUWE\\RXUDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRU WKHDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRIWKRVHDFWLQJRQ\RXUEHKDOI

/C41/C2e
,QWKHSHUIRUPDQFHRI\RXURQJRLQJRSHUDWLRQVVXEMHFWWRVXFK /C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74

RU
/C42/C2e
,QWKHSHUIRUPDQFHRI
/C79/C6f/C75/C72/C20/C77/C6f/C72/C6b
VXEMHFWWRVXFK
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74 EXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWR
/C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79
RU
/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79/C20/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65 LQFOXGHGLQWKH
/C70/C72/C6f/C64/C75/C63/C74/C73/C2d/C63/C6f/C6d/C70/C6c/C65/C74/C65/C64/C20/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C61/C74/C69/C6f/C6e/C73/C20/C68/C61/C7a/C61/C72/C64 DQGRQO\LI

/C31/C2e
7KH
/C20/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74/C20 UHTXLUHV\RXWRSURYLGHWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVXFKFRYHUDJH DQG
/C32/C2e
7KLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74/C20 SURYLGHVVXFKFRYHUDJH
DQG
/C43/C2e
6XEMHFWDOZD\VWRWKHWHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQVRIWKLVSROLF\LQFOXGLQJWKHOLPLWVRILQVXUDQFHWKH,QVXUHUZLOOQRW SURYLGHVXFKDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGZLWK

/C31/C2e
&RYHUDJHEURDGHUWKDQZKDW\RXDUHUHTXLUHGWRSURYLGHE\WKH /C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74

RU
/C32/C2e
$KLJKHUOLPLWRILQVXUDQFHWKDQZKDW\RXDUHUHTXLUHGWRSURYLGHE\WKH /C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74
$Q\FRYHUDJHJUDQWHGE\WKLV3DUDJUDSK
/C49/C2e
VKDOODSSO\VROHO\WRWKHH[WHQWSHUPLVVLEOHE\ODZ
/C49/C49/C2e
,IWKHZULWWHQFRQWUDFWUHTXLUHVDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGFRYHUDJHXQGHUWKHHGLWLRQRI&*RU&*WKHQ SDUDJUDSK
/C49/C2e
DERYHLVGHOHWHGLQLWVHQWLUHW\DQGUHSODFHGE\WKHIROORZLQJ

/C57/C48/C4f/C20/C49/C53/C20/C41/C4e/C20/C49/C4e/C53/C55/C52/C45/C44/C20 LVDPHQGHGWRLQFOXGHDVDQ
/C49/C6e/C73/C75/C72/C65/C64
DQ\SHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQZKRP\RXDUHUHTXLUHGE\
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74 WRDGGDVDQDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGRQWKLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74
EXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWROLDELOLW\IRU
/C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79
/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79

/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79/C20/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65 RU
/C70/C65/C72/C73/C6f/C6e/C61/C6c/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C61/C64/C76/C65/C72/C74/C69/C73/C69/C6e/C67/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79 FDXVHGLQZKROHRULQSDUWE\\RXUDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRU WKHDFWVRURPLVVLRQVRIWKRVHDFWLQJRQ\RXUEHKDOI

/C41/C2e
,QWKHSHUIRUPDQFHRI\RXURQJRLQJRSHUDWLRQVVXEMHFWWRVXFK /C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74

/C31/C2e
7KH
/C20/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74/C20 UHTXLUHV\RXWRSURYLGHWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVXFKFRYHUDJH DQG
/C32/C2e
7KLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74/C20 SURYLGHVVXFKFRYHUDJH
/C49/C49/C49/C2e
%XWLIWKH
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74/C20

UHTXLUHV

/C41/C2e
$GGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGFRYHUDJHXQGHUWKHHGLWLRQ HGLWLRQRUHGLWLRQRI&*RUXQGHUWKH HGLWLRQRI&*
RU
/C42/C2e
$GGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGFRYHUDJHZLWK³DULVLQJRXWRI´ODQJXDJH

WKHQSDUDJUDSK
/C49/C2e
DERYHLVGHOHWHGLQLWVHQWLUHW\DQGUHSODFHGE\WKHIROORZLQJ

/C57/C48/C4f/C20/C49/C53/C20/C41/C4e/C20/C49/C4e/C53/C55/C52/C45/C44 LVDPHQGHGWRLQFOXGHDVDQ
/C49/C6e/C73/C75/C72/C65/C64
DQ\SHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQZKRP\RXDUHUHTXLUHGE\
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74 WRDGGDVDQDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGRQWKLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74
EXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWROLDELOLW\IRU
/C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79
/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79

/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79/C20/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65 RU
/C70/C65/C72/C73/C6f/C6e/C61/C6c/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C61/C64/C76/C65/C72/C74/C69/C73/C69/C6e/C67/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79 DULVLQJRXWRI
/C79/C6f/C75/C72/C20/C77/C6f/C72/C6b
WKDWLVVXEMHFWWRVXFK
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e
/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74

476
&1$3$5$02817
6076046485
15 The Continental Insurance Co. 10/21/2024
Rick Engineering Company
%ODQNHW$GGLWLRQDO,QVXUHG2ZQHUV/HVVHHVRU&RQWUDFWRUV ZLWK3URGXFWV&RPSOHWHG2SHUDWLRQV&RYHUDJH(QGRUVHPHQW &1$
;;

3ROLF\1R

3DJHRI (QGRUVHPHQW1R

(IIHFWLYH'DWH

,QVXUHG1DPH

&RS\ULJKW&1$$OO5LJKWV5HVHUYHG
/C41/C42/C43/C44/C45/C46/C47/C48/C49
/C4a/C4b/C4c/C4d/C4e
/C49/C56/C2e
%XWLIWKH
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74/C20 UHTXLUHVDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGFRYHUDJHWRWKHJUHDWHVWH[WHQWSHUPLVVLEOHE\ODZWKHQ SDUDJUDSK
/C49/C2e
DERYHLVGHOHWHGLQLWVHQWLUHW\DQGUHSODFHGE\WKHIROORZLQJ

/C57/C48/C4f/C20/C49/C53/C20/C41/C4e/C20/C49/C4e/C53/C55/C52/C45/C44 LVDPHQGHGWRLQFOXGHDVDQ
/C49/C6e/C73/C75/C72/C65/C64
DQ\SHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQZKRP\RXDUHUHTXLUHGE\
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74 WRDGGDVDQDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGRQWKLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74
EXWRQO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWROLDELOLW\IRU
/C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79
/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79

/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79/C20/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65 RU
/C70/C65/C72/C73/C6f/C6e/C61/C6c/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C61/C64/C76/C65/C72/C74/C69/C73/C69/C6e/C67/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79 DULVLQJRXWRI
/C79/C6f/C75/C72/C20/C77/C6f/C72/C6b
WKDWLVVXEMHFWWRVXFK
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e
/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74

/C56/C2e
7KHLQVXUDQFHJUDQWHGE\WKLVHQGRUVHPHQWWRWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGGRHVQRWDSSO\WR /C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79

/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79
/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65
RU
/C70/C65/C72/C73/C6f/C6e/C61/C6c/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C61/C64/C76/C65/C72/C74/C69/C73/C69/C6e/C67/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79 DULVLQJRXWRI

/C41/C2e
7KHUHQGHULQJRIRUWKHIDLOXUHWRUHQGHUDQ\SURIHVVLRQDODUFKLWHFWXUDOHQJLQHHULQJRUVXUYH\LQJVHUYLFHV

LQFOXGLQJ

/C31/C2e
7KHSUHSDULQJDSSURYLQJRUIDLOLQJWRSUHSDUHRUDSSURYHPDSVVKRSGUDZLQJVRSLQLRQVUHSRUWVVXUYH\V ILHOGRUGHUVFKDQJHRUGHUVRUGUDZLQJVDQGVSHFLILFDWLRQV DQG
/C32/C2e
6XSHUYLVRU\LQVSHFWLRQDUFKLWHFWXUDORUHQJLQHHULQJDFWLYLWLHV RU
/C42/C2e
$Q\SUHPLVHVRUZRUNIRUZKLFKWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGLVVSHFLILFDOO\OLVWHGDVDQDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGRQDQRWKHU HQGRUVHPHQWDWWDFKHGWRWKLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74

/C56/C49/C2e
8QGHU
/C43/C4f/C4d/C4d/C45/C52/C43/C49/C41/C4c/C20/C47/C45/C4e/C45/C52/C41/C4c/C20/C4c/C49/C41/C42/C49/C4c/C49/C54/C59/C20/C43/C4f/C4e/C44/C49/C54/C49/C4f/C4e/C53/C2c/C20 WKH
/C20
&RQGLWLRQHQWLWOHG
/C4f/C74/C68/C65/C72/C20/C49/C6e/C73/C75/C72/C61/C6e/C63/C65 LVDPHQGHGWR
DGGWKHIROORZLQJZKLFKVXSHUVHGHVDQ\SURYLVLRQWRWKHFRQWUDU\LQWKLV&RQGLWLRQRUHOVHZKHUHLQWKLV /C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65
/C50/C61/C72/C74

/C50/C72/C69/C6d/C61/C72/C79/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C4e/C6f/C6e/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C69/C62/C75/C74/C6f/C72/C79/C20/C49/C6e/C73/C75/C72/C61/C6e/C63/C65 :LWKUHVSHFWWRRWKHULQVXUDQFHDYDLODEOHWRWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGXQGHUZKLFKWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGLVDQDPHG LQVXUHGWKLVLQVXUDQFHLVSULPDU\WRDQGZLOOQRWVHHNFRQWULEXWLRQIURPVXFKRWKHULQVXUDQFHSURYLGHGWKDWD /C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e
/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74
UHTXLUHVWKHLQVXUDQFHSURYLGHGE\WKLVSROLF\WREH

/C31/C2e
3ULPDU\DQGQRQFRQWULEXWLQJZLWKRWKHULQVXUDQFHDYDLODEOHWRWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHG RU
/C32/C2e
3ULPDU\DQGWRQRWVHHNFRQWULEXWLRQIURPDQ\RWKHULQVXUDQFHDYDLODEOHWRWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHG %XWH[FHSWDVVSHFLILHGDERYHWKLVLQVXUDQFHZLOOEHH[FHVVRIDOORWKHULQVXUDQFHDYDLODEOHWRWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHG /C56/C49/C49/C2e
6ROHO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLQVXUDQFHJUDQWHGE\WKLVHQGRUVHPHQWWKHVHFWLRQHQWLWOHG /C43/C4f/C4d/C4d/C45/C52/C43/C49/C41/C4c/C20/C47/C45/C4e/C45/C52/C41/C4c /C4c/C49/C41/C42/C49/C4c/C49/C54/C59/C20/C43/C4f/C4e/C44/C49/C54/C49/C4f/C4e/C53 LVDPHQGHGDVIROORZV

7KH&RQGLWLRQHQWLWOHG
/C44/C75/C74/C69/C65/C73/C20/C49/C6e/C20/C54/C68/C65/C20/C45/C76/C65/C6e/C74/C20/C6f/C66/C20/C4f/C63/C63/C75/C72/C72/C65/C6e/C63/C65/C2c/C20/C4f/C66/C66/C65/C6e/C73/C65/C2c/C20/C43/C6c/C61/C69/C6d/C20/C6f/C72/C20/C53/C75/C69/C74 LVDPHQGHGZLWKWKHDGGLWLRQRI
WKHIROORZLQJ

$Q\DGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGSXUVXDQWWRWKLVHQGRUVHPHQWZLOODVVRRQDVSUDFWLFDEOH

/C31/C2e
*LYHWKH,QVXUHUZULWWHQQRWLFHRIDQ\
/C63/C6c/C61/C69/C6d
RUDQ\
/C6f/C63/C63/C75/C72/C72/C65/C6e/C63/C65
RURIIHQVHZKLFKPD\UHVXOWLQD
/C63/C6c/C61/C69/C6d

/C32/C2e
6HQGWKH,QVXUHUFRSLHVRIDOOOHJDOSDSHUVUHFHLYHGDQGRWKHUZLVHFRRSHUDWHZLWKWKH,QVXUHU /C20
LQWKHLQYHVWLJDWLRQ
GHIHQVHRUVHWWOHPHQWRIWKH
/C63/C6c/C61/C69/C6d

DQG
/C33/C2e
0DNHDYDLODEOHDQ\RWKHULQVXUDQFHDQGHQGHDYRUWRWHQGHUWKHGHIHQVHDQGLQGHPQLW\RIDQ\ /C63/C6c/C61/C69/C6d
WRDQ\RWKHU
LQVXUHURUVHOILQVXUHUZKRVHSROLF\RUSURJUDPDSSOLHVWRDORVVWKDWWKH,QVXUHUFRYHUVXQGHUWKLV /C63/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C70/C61/C72/C74

+RZHYHULIWKH
/C77/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74 UHTXLUHVWKLVLQVXUDQFHWREHSULPDU\DQGQRQFRQWULEXWRU\WKLVSDUDJUDSK /C33/C2e
GRHVQRWDSSO\WRRWKHULQVXUDQFHXQGHUZKLFKWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGLVDQDPHGLQVXUHG 7KH,QVXUHU
/C20
KDVQRGXW\WRGHIHQGRULQGHPQLI\DQDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGXQGHUWKLVHQGRUVHPHQWXQWLOWKH,QVXUHUUHFHLYHV ZULWWHQQRWLFHRID
/C63/C6c/C61/C69/C6d
IURPWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHG
477
/Caa/C34/C22/C20/C28/C3b/C21/C6d/C36/C5a/C38/Ca4/Ca5/C36/C3c/Cab/Cac/Cac/Cac

(IIHFWLYH'DWH

,QVXUHG1DPH

&RS\ULJKW&1$$OO5LJKWV5HVHUYHG
/C41/C42/C43/C44/C45/C46/C47/C48/C49
/C4a/C4b/C4c/C4d/C4e
/C56/C49/C49/C49/C2e
6ROHO\ZLWKUHVSHFWWRWKHLQVXUDQFHJUDQWHGE\WKLVHQGRUVHPHQWWKHVHFWLRQHQWLWOHG /C44/C45/C46/C49/C4e/C49/C54/C49/C4f/C4e/C53
LVDPHQGHGWR
DGGWKHIROORZLQJGHILQLWLRQ

/C57/C72/C69/C74/C74/C65/C6e/C20/C63/C6f/C6e/C74/C72/C61/C63/C74 PHDQVDZULWWHQFRQWUDFWRUZULWWHQDJUHHPHQWWKDWUHTXLUHV\RXWRPDNHDSHUVRQRURUJDQL]DWLRQDQ DGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHG
/C20
RQWKLV
/C43/C6f/C76/C65/C72/C61/C67/C65/C20/C50/C61/C72/C74
SURYLGHGWKHFRQWUDFWRUDJUHHPHQW

/C41/C2e
:DVH[HFXWHGSULRUWR

/C31/C2e
7KH
/C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79
RU
/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79/C20/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65

RU
/C32/C2e
7KHRIIHQVHWKDWFDXVHGWKH
/C70/C65/C72/C73/C6f/C6e/C61/C6c/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C61/C64/C76/C65/C72/C74/C69/C73/C69/C6e/C67/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79

IRUZKLFKWKHDGGLWLRQDOLQVXUHGVHHNVFRYHUDJH
DQG
/C42/C2e
,VVWLOOLQHIIHFWDWWKHWLPHRIWKH
/C62/C6f/C64/C69/C6c/C79/C20/C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79/C20 RU
/C70/C72/C6f/C70/C65/C72/C74/C79/C20/C64/C61/C6d/C61/C67/C65
/C6f/C63/C63/C75/C72/C72/C65/C6e/C63/C65
RU
/C70/C65/C72/C73/C6f/C6e/C61/C6c/C20/C61/C6e/C64/C20/C61/C64/C76/C65/C72/C74/C69/C73/C69/C6e/C67 /C69/C6e/C6a/C75/C72/C79/C20
RIIHQVH
$OORWKHUWHUPVDQGFRQGLWLRQVRIWKH3ROLF\UHPDLQXQFKDQJHG 7KLVHQGRUVHPHQWZKLFKIRUPVDSDUWRIDQGLVIRUDWWDFKPHQWWRWKH3ROLF\LVVXHGE\WKHGHVLJQDWHG,QVXUHUVWDNHVHIIHFW RQWKHHIIHFWLYHGDWHRIVDLG3ROLF\DWWKHKRXUVWDWHGLQVDLG3ROLF\XQOHVVDQRWKHUHIIHFWLYHGDWHLVVKRZQEHORZDQG H[SLUHVFRQFXUUHQWO\ZLWKVDLG3ROLF\
478
01/01/2024
479
/0/1/2/3/4/5/i255/7/1/9/1/10/11/i255/7/1/8/i255/12/12/13/14/15/16/17/18/i255/19/15/16/20/16/15/17/21/22/i255 /39/i255/12/7/18/i255/18/2/2/i255/40/3/41/42/28/26/i255/40/27/26/27/10/30/27/25/43/i255 /44/28/i255/3/26/i255/45/24/25/27/10/26/28/1/1/25/i255/32/24/25/i255/32/41/10/27/27/25/i255/28/42/32/28/8/i255 /44/29/i255/5/1/45/i255/42/32/30/27/i255/32/41/10/27/27/25/i255/45/24/25/27/10/i255/46/10/3/28/28/27/24/i255/4/1/24/28/10/32/4/28/i255/28/1/i255/47/10/1/30/3/25/27/i255/24/1/28/3/4/27/i255/1/29/i255/4/32/24/4/27/2/2/32/28/3/1/24/i255/28/1/i255/32/i255/47/32/10/28/5/i255/28/1/i255/46/42/1/11/i255/28/42/27/i255/18/41/27/24/28/i255/1/29/i255 /40/27/4/1/10/25/i255/42/32/26/i255/3/26/26/45/27/25/i255/32/i255/12/27/10/28/3/29/3/4/32/28/27/i255/1/29/i255/44/24/26/45/10/32/24/4/27/48/i255/32/24/25/i255/3/29/i255/46/27/i255/4/32/24/4/27/2/i255/32/i255/47/1/2/3/4/5/i255/28/27/10/11/i255/25/27/26/4/10/3/49/27/25/i255/1/24/i255/28/42/32/28/i255/12/27/10/28/3/29/3/4/32/28/27/i255/1/29/i255 /44/24/26/45/10/32/24/4/27/i255/29/1/10/i255/32/24/5/i255/10/27/32/26/1/24/i255/1/28/42/27/10/i255/28/42/32/24/i255/24/1/24/47/32/5/11/27/24/28/i255/1/29/i255/47/10/27/11/3/45/11/48/i255/28/42/27/24/i255/24/1/28/3/4/27/i255/1/29/i255/4/32/24/4/27/2/2/32/28/3/1/24/i255/46/3/2/2/i255/49/27/i255/47/10/1/30/3/25/27/25/i255/28/1/i255 /26/45/4/42/i255/12/27/10/28/3/29/3/4/32/28/27/42/1/2/25/27/10/26/i255/32/28/i255/2/27/32/26/28/i255/21/15/i255/25/32/5/26/i255/3/24/i255/32/25/30/32/24/4/27/i255/1/29/i255/28/42/27/i255/25/32/28/27/i255/4/32/24/4/27/2/2/32/28/3/1/24/i255/3/26/i255/27/29/29/27/4/28/3/30/27/43/i255 /44/29/i255/24/1/28/3/4/27/i255/3/26/i255/11/32/3/2/27/25/48/i255/28/42/27/24/i255/47/10/1/1/29/i255/1/29/i255/11/32/3/2/3/24/41/i255/28/1/i255/28/42/27/i255/2/32/26/28/i255/50/24/1/46/24/i255/11/32/3/2/3/24/41/i255/32/25/25/10/27/26/26/i255/1/29/i255/28/42/27/i255/12/27/10/28/3/29/3/4/32/28/27/42/1/2/25/27/10/i255/1/24/i255/29/3/2/27/i255/46/3/28/42/i255 /28/42/27/i255/18/41/27/24/28/i255/1/29/i255/40/27/4/1/10/25/i255/46/3/2/2/i255/49/27/i255/26/45/29/29/3/4/3/27/24/28/i255/28/1/i255/47/10/1/30/27/i255/24/1/28/3/4/27/43/i255 /18/24/5/i255/29/32/3/2/45/10/27/i255/49/5/i255/45/26/i255/28/1/i255/24/1/28/3/29/5/i255/26/45/4/42/i255/47/27/10/26/1/24/26/i255/1/10/i255/1/10/41/32/24/3/51/32/28/3/1/24/26/i255/46/3/2/2/i255/24/1/28/i255/27/52/28/27/24/25/i255/1/10/i255/3/24/30/32/2/3/25/32/28/27/i255/26/45/4/42/i255/4/32/24/4/27/2/2/32/28/3/1/24/48/i255/1/10/i255 /3/11/47/1/26/27/i255/32/24/5/i255/2/3/32/49/3/2/3/28/5/i255/1/10/i255/1/49/2/3/41/32/28/3/1/24/i255/45/47/1/24/i255/45/26/i255/1/10/i255/28/42/27/i255/18/41/27/24/28/i255/1/29/i255/40/27/4/1/10/25/43/i255 /18/2/2/i255/1/28/42/27/10/i255/28/27/10/11/26/i255/32/24/25/i255/4/1/24/25/3/28/3/1/24/26/i255/1/29/i255/28/42/27/i255/47/1/2/3/4/5/i255/10/27/11/32/3/24/i255/45/24/4/42/32/24/41/27/25/43/i255 /53/42/3/26/i255/27/24/25/1/10/26/27/11/27/24/28/48/i255/46/42/3/4/42/i255/29/1/10/11/26/i255/32/i255/47/32/10/28/i255/1/29/i255/32/24/25/i255/3/26/i255/29/1/10/i255/32/28/28/32/4/42/11/27/24/28/i255/28/1/i255/28/42/27/i255/47/1/2/3/4/5/i255/3/26/26/45/27/25/i255/49/5/i255/28/42/27/i255/25/27/26/3/41/24/32/28/27/25/i255/44/24/26/45/10/27/10/26/48/i255 /28/32/50/27/26/i255/27/29/29/27/4/28/i255/1/24/i255/28/42/27/i255/0/1/2/3/4/5/i255/23/29/29/27/4/28/3/30/27/i255/25/32/28/27/i255/1/29/i255/26/32/3/25/i255/47/1/2/3/4/5/i255/32/28/i255/28/42/27/i255/42/1/45/10/i255/26/28/32/28/27/25/i255/3/24/i255/26/32/3/25/i255/47/1/2/3/4/5/48/i255/45/24/2/27/26/26/i255/32/24/1/28/42/27/10/i255 /27/29/29/27/4/28/3/30/27/i255/25/32/28/27/i255/19/28/42/27/i255/23/24/25/1/10/26/27/11/27/24/28/i255/23/29/29/27/4/28/3/30/27/i255/31/32/28/27/22/i255/3/26/i255/26/42/1/46/24/i255/49/27/2/1/46/48/i255/32/24/25/i255/27/52/47/3/10/27/26/i255/4/1/24/4/45/10/10/27/24/28/2/5/i255/46/3/28/42/i255/26/32/3/25/i255/47/1/2/3/4/5/i255 /45/24/2/27/26/26/i255/32/24/1/28/42/27/10/i255/27/52/47/3/10/32/28/3/1/24/i255/25/32/28/27/i255/3/26/i255/26/42/1/46/24/i255/49/27/2/1/46/43/i255 /54/55/56/57/58/59/i255/55/61/i255/58/62/54/58/59/63/63/62/56/57/55/54/i255/56/55/i255/58/59/64/56/57/61/57/58/62/56/59/65/55/63/66/59/64/67/i255 /75/76/77/78/79/80/81/82/83/84/78/79/85/86/87/88/89/90/81/91/87/81/78/78/84/87/81/91/92/93/77/94/76/81/95

:&
:&
480
Workers Compensation And Employers Liability Insurance
Policy Endorsement

BLANKET WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS
This endorsement changes the policy to which it is attached.

It is agreed that Part One - Workers’ Compensation Insurance G. Recovery From Others and Part Two - Employers’ Liability Insurance H. Recovery From Others are amended by adding the following:

We will not enforce our right to recover against persons or organizations. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) PREMIUM CHARGE - Refer to the Schedule of Operations
The charge will be an amount to which you and we agree that is a percentage of the total standard premium for California exposure. The amount is 2%.

All other terms and conditions of the policy remain unchanged.

This endorsement, which forms a part of and is for attachment to the policy issued by the designated Insurers, takes effect on the Policy Effective Date of said policy at the hour stated in said policy, unless another effective date (the Endorsement Effective Date) is shown below, and expires concurrently with said policy unless another expiration date is shown below.

Endorsement No: 2; Page: 1 of 1
Underwriting Company: American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, 151 N Franklin St, Chicago, IL 60606
Form No: G-19160-B (11-1997)
Endorsement Effective Date:

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 10.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Bob Moehling, Public Works Director
PREPARED BY: Renée Santos, Executive Assistant - Engineering SUBJECT:

Approval of Purchase Order Increase for Michael Baker International, Inc. for Plan Check Services

ABSTRACT
Additional funding of $96,750 is needed to support ongoing engineering plan check services provided by Michael Baker International, Inc., under its current on-call consulting services agreement with the City. The additional $96,750 will need to be appropriated from the General Fund and an increase to MBI’spurchase order (PO) will need to be approved. Approval of this request will ensure continuity of service through the end of the fiscal year.

RECOMMENDATION
Amend the Fiscal Year (FY) 2025/26 Operating Budget to establish an additional appropriation of $96,750, as detailed in the fiscal impact statement;
Approve a $96,750 increase to the purchase order with Michael Baker International, Inc. for On-Call Plan Check services for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2025/26; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase order increase on behalf of the City.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On June 20, 2023, the City Council authorized Agreements for miscellaneous On-Call consulting services with various consulting firms including Michael Baker International, Inc. for engineering plan check services (Vote:
4-0).

On June 17, 2025, the City Council approved a purchase order with Michael Baker International, Inc. for On- Call Plan Check services for FY 2025/26 for an amount not to exceed $440,000 from the Engineering General Fund (Vote: 5-0).

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
This item aligns with the City Council goal of: maintaining a high performing organization that values fiscal CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 1 of 2
powered by Legistar™
482
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 10.
sustainability, transparency, accountability and organizational efficiency relating to an administrative priority.

DISCUSSION
On June 20, 2023, the City Council approved on-call agreements for engineering plan check services with multiple consulting firms, including Michael Baker International, Inc. (MBI). MBI has since been providing ongoing civil engineering plan check services in support of private development projects, including grading permits and street improvement encroachment permits.

On June 17, 2025, the City Council approved a purchase order (PO) with MBI for Fiscal Year 2025/26 in an amount not to exceed $440,000. Due to budgetary constraints, the initial purchase order was issued in a reduced amount of $428,250. Based on current projections, staff has determined that the amount of the existing PO is insufficient and that additional funding is required to support continued service through the end of the fiscal year. An increase of $96,750 is needed, bringing the total PO amount to $525,000. To increase this PO, an additional appropriation of $96,750 is needed for the remainder of the fiscal year.

Approval of this request will allow the City to continue providing timely plan check services and avoid delays in development review and permitting.

PUBLIC NOTICING
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

FISCAL IMPACT
The approval of this item will increase the FY 2025/26 budget by $96,750. If approved, Finance staff recommends City Council approve an amendment to the FY 2025/26 Operating Budget to appropriate $96,750 to the Engineering account 1106120-60600 using the General Fund Unassigned Fund balance. Typically, the cost for these services is recovered through permit fees paid for by project applicants as part of the development review process.

With the additional budget, there will be sufficient funds available in the Operating Budget Engineering account to accommodate the additional PO increase request.

ATTACHMENTS
None.

CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 2 of 2
powered by Legistar™
483

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 11.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Bob Moehling, Public Works Director
PREPARED BY: Renée Santos, Executive Assistant - Engineering SUBJECT:

Approval of Purchase Orders with Michael Baker International, Inc., HR Green Pacific, Inc., Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC, and Rick Engineering Company

ABSTRACT
This item requests authorization of purchase orders for several on-call consultants, including Michael Baker International, Inc.; HR Green Pacific, Inc.; Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC; and Rick Engineering Company. These consultants provide specialized services, including plan check, land development review, inspection, and traffic engineering. Continued use of these on-call consultants allows the City to efficiently deliver projects and maintain timely development review. Approval of the requested authorizations will ensure continuity of service.

RECOMMENDATION
Approve a purchase order with Michael Baker International, Inc., for On-Call Plan Check services for fiscal year 2026/27 for an amount not to exceed $470,000 from the Engineering General Fund; Approve a purchase order with Michael Baker International, Inc., for On-Call Land Development Review services for fiscal year 2026/27 for an amount not to exceed $80,000 from the Engineering General Fund; and Approve a purchase order with HR Green Pacific, Inc. for On-Call Plan Check services for fiscal year 2026/27 for an amount not to exceed $250,000 from the Engineering General Fund; and Approve a purchase order with Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC for On-Call Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) and Inspection services for fiscal year 2026/27 for an amount not to exceed $500,000 from the Engineering General Fund; and
Approve a purchase order with Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC for On-Call National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) services for fiscal year 2026/27 for an amount not to exceed $130,000 from the Engineering General Fund; and
Approve a purchase order with Rick Engineering Company for On-Call Traffic Engineering services for fiscal year 2026/27 for an amount not to exceed $144,900 from the Engineering General Fund; CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
484
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 11.

Approve a purchase order with Rick Engineering Company for On-Call Traffic Engineering consultant services for Fiscal Year 2026/27, for an amount not to exceed $238,870, with $73,865 from Capital Improvement Plan project No. 13074, $73,865 from Capital Improvement Plan project No. 13077, $73,865 from Capital Improvement Plan project No. 13078, and $17,275 from Capital Improvement Plan project 13079; and Authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase orders on behalf of the City.

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On June 20, 2023, the City Council authorized entering into Agreements for miscellaneous on-call consulting services that included Michael Baker International, Inc., HR Green Pacific, Inc., Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC, and Rick Engineering Company (Vote: 4-0).

On June 17, 2025, a first amendment to the June 20, 2023, on-call agreement with Anser Advisory Management, LLC was issued to reflect the company’sformal name change to Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC.

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
This item aligns with the City Council goal of: maintaining a high performing organization that values fiscal sustainability, transparency, accountability and organizational efficiency relating to priority Tier 1.

DISCUSSION
On June 20, 2023, the City Council approved on-call agreements for engineering plan check, land development review, public works and storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and inspection, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) inspection, and traffic engineering services with Michael Baker International, Inc. (MBI), HR Green Pacific, Inc. (HR Green), Accenture Infrastructure and Capital Projects, LLC (Accenture), and Rick Engineering Company (REC). These companies have been providing ongoing engineering services under the current on-call agreements.

New purchase orders (POs) are necessary to continue services in the upcoming fiscal year (FY) 2026/27 to supplement current staffing. The POs are listed below by consultant and service type, along with the PO amount based on trend analysis and projected services for FY 2026/27. The Rick Engineering Company POs are based on the proposals, which are included as attachments herein. A summary of the POs is as follows:

Consultant and Services PO Amount
MBI - Plan Check Services $470,000
MBI - Land Development Review Services $80,000
HR Green - Plan Check Services $250,000
Accenture - Public Works and SWPPP Inspection Services $500,000 Accenture - NPDES Inspection Services $130,000
REC - Traffic Engineering Consultant Services $144,900
REC - Neighborhood Traffic Management Program: CIP Project Numbers 13074, 13077, 13078, 13079
$238,870
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
485
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 11.

PUBLIC NOTICING
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for these POs is available in the FY 2026/27 Engineering Operating Budget.

Company PO Amount Funding Source
MBI - Plan Check Services $470,000 1106120-60600
MBI - Land Development Review Services $80,000 1106120-60360 HR Green - Plan Check Services $250,000 1106120-60600
Accenture - Public Works and SWPPP
Inspection Services
$500,000 1106120-60640
Accenture - NPDES Inspection Services $130,000 4316120-60640 REC - Traffic Engineering Consultant
Services
$144,900 1106120-60360
REC - Neighborhood Traffic Management
Program: CIP 13074
$73,865 3067500-60360/
13074306-100
REC - Citywide Signal Modifications: CIP
13077
$73,865 3027500-60360/
13077302-100
REC - Traffic Signal Optimization /
Congestion Management: CIP 13078
$73,865 3027500-60360/
13078302-100
REC - Priority Traffic Signal: CIP 13079 $17,275 3067500-60360/ 13079306-100

ATTACHMENTS
ATT 1 - Rick Engineering Company Proposal - Operating Budget ATT 2 - Rick Engineering Company Proposal - CIP Budget
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
486

April 30, 2026

Mr. Jeffrey J. Hitch, P.E.

City Engineer
City of Murrieta
1 Town Square
Murrieta, California 92562

SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR AS NEEDED SUPPLEMENTAL STAFFING TRAFFIC

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA (RICK JOB NUMBER 16750-F)

Dear Jeff:

Pursuant to your request, RICK is pleased to present a Scope of Services and associated Fee to provide professional engineering services for the subject project. This work consists of assisting the Engineering Department by providing staff one day a week at City Hall from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, to prepare staff reports and work orders, attend meetings, attend and present at Traffic Commission, respond to resident concerns/inquiries, perform signal timing tasks, and to provide plan checking services.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide these services. Should you have any questions regarding this proposal, please feel free to contact me at (619) 291 -0707. Thank you for requesting RICK to provide these services.

Sincerely,

RICK

Brian R. Stephenson, P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E.

RCE No. 69471
Associate Principal

K:\Files\16750\text\16750f.060.letter_operating.docx

Attachments
487

SCOPE OF WORK

Provide Staff at City Hall one day a week from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027. Typical tasks to be performed include:

1. Staff Reports
Assist the Director of Public Works and City Engineer by preparing staff reports for City Council, Planning Commission, and Traffic Commission meeting s. Items to be prepared for staff reports may include signal warrant analysis, all way stop a nalysis, road closure analysis, traffic calming measures, signal timing analysis, and all backup data needed for the report.

2. Meetings
Attend meetings as necessary for City Council, Plan ning Commission, Traffic Commission, Development Review Committee, School District, Poli ce Department, developer/applicant meetings, and Project Design Meetings.

3. Traffic Commission
Prepare staff reports for Traffic Commission meetings and present the reports on action items and informational items to the Commission at the meetings.

4. Work Orders
Prepare work orders for City of Murrieta maintenanc e staff. Typical work order items include sign installations, curb markings, and pavement markings/striping.

5. Resident Concerns/Inquiries
Respond to resident phone calls/emails requesting t raffic analysis within their neighborhoods.

Typical duties include analyzing locations for all way stops, additional signage, sight distance analysis, parking restrictions, and traffic calming measures.

6. Signal Timing
Prepare signal timing sheets for new signal install ations and troubleshoot problems at existing signal locations. Make any timing adjustments deemed necessary.

7. Plan Checking
Review and comment on any traffic signal plans, sig ning and striping plans, and traffic control plans that are not submitted as part of a separate development plan set, as requested by the City Engineer/Engineering Department.

488
FEE

Our fee for the work to be performed for the As-Nee ded Traffic Engineering Services would be based on a fixed fee in the amount of one hundred and forty-four thousand nine hundred dollars ($144,900.00).

Any printing, title company fees, blueprinting and miscellaneous expenses are included within this agreement. Not included are any items not specifically referred to above.

Fees and expenses will be billed monthly as the wor k progresses, and the net amount shall be due withi n thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the invoice in the Client's office.

489

April 30, 2026

Mr. Jeffrey J. Hitch, P.E.

City Engineer
City of Murrieta
1 Town Square
Murrieta, California 92562

SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS FOR THE CITY OF MURRIETA,
CALIFORNIA (RICK JOB NUMBER 16750-F)

Dear Jeff:

Pursuant to your request, RICK is pleased to present a Scope of Services and associated Fee to provide professional engineering services for the subject project. This work consists of assisting the Engineering Department with providing traffic engineering services for the following Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Projects, from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027:

Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (CIP 13074)
Citywide Signal Modifications (CIP 13077)
Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion Management (CIP 13078) Priority Traffic Signals (CIP 13079)

Sincerely,

RICK

Brian R. Stephenson, P.E., T.E., P.T.O.E.

RCE No. 69471
Associate Principal

K:\Files\16750\text\16750f.061.letter_CIP.docx

Attachments
490

SCOPE OF WORK

Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (CIP 13074)

Assist the Engineering Department with tasks relate d to the City’s approved Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). Typical duties include:

 Responding to resident requests for NTMP related issues.

 Investigating complaints related to traffic safety and recommending actions related to these requests.

 Managing the traffic counting subconsultants tasked with performing traffic volume counts, speed surveys, classification counts, and license plate surveys.

 Performing all way stop analysis.

 Performing signal warrant analysis.

 Preparing staff reports summarizing findings for Traffic Commission meetings.

 Attending Traffic Commission meetings.

 Attending neighborhood meetings.

Citywide Signal Modifications (CIP 13077)

Provide traffic engineering services related to Cit ywide Traffic Signal Modifications. Typical tasks include the following:

 Maintain the City’s left-turn phasing warrant analy sis and signalized intersections throughout the City and determine future intersecti on needs for protected left-turn phasing.

 Identify locations for Closed Circuit Television (C CTV) installations. Typical tasks include preparing bid specifications and documents for the CCTV’s installations and assisting City Staff with advertising the project(s) and providing Project Management.

 Identify locations for installation of cabinet swit ches. The switches will bring multiple types of communication equipment back to the TMC, f or monitoring of battery-back up and video detection, as well as the signal and CCTV camera.

 Identify locations for upgrades from wireless commu nication to single mode fiber and assist City Staff with advertising the project(s) and providing Project Management.

491

Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion Management (CIP 13078)

Provide traffic engineering services related to tra ffic signal timing at the City’s signalized intersections. Typical tasks include the following:

 Perform optimized timing parameters for traffic sig nals that are operating in free mode utilizing the Synchro software and implement the ti ming at the intersections via the City’s Quicnet system from within the Traffic Management Center.

 Perform optimized corridor timing parameters for the City’s Major and Arterial roadways utilizing the Synchro software and implement the ti ming at the intersections via the City’s Quicnet system from within the Traffic Manag ement Center. This task will require coordination with Caltrans and the cities of Temecu la and Menifee at locations that are shared between agencies.

 Assist the City’s Traffic Signal Technician with tr oubleshooting timing issues at City intersections.

 Implement current California Manual on Uniform Traf fic Control Devices (MUTCD) timing requirements at the City’s signalized intersections.

 Manage the traffic counting subconsultants tasked w ith performing turning movement counts at signalized intersection locations and wit h daily segment counts along the City’s roadway corridors.

Priority Traffic Signals (CIP 13079)

Assist the engineering department by maintaining th e City’s Traffic Signal Priority list. Typical tasks include the following:

 Responding to resident and staff requests for future traffic signalized locations.

 Performing traffic signal warrant analysis at locat ions that are anticipated to meet signalization warrants.

 Maintaining a list and ranking of warranted traffic signal locations.

492
FEE

Our fee for the work to be performed for the Traffi c Engineering Services for Capital Improvement Plan Projects would be based on a fixed fee in the amount of two hundred and thirty-eight thousand eight hundred and seventy dol lars ($238,870.00) and is summarized as follows:

 Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (CIP 13074) $ 73,865.00  Citywide Signal Modifications (CIP 13077) 73,865.00
 Traffic Signal Optimization/Congestion Management (CIP 13078) 73,865.00  Priority Traffic Signals (CIP 13079) 17,275.00
Total: $238,870.00

Any printing, title company fees, blueprinting and miscellaneous expenses are included within this agreement. Not included are any items not specifically referred to above.

Fees and expenses will be billed monthly as the work progresses, and the net amount shall be due within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the invoice in the Client's office.

493

CITY OF MURRIETA
City Council Meeting Agenda
Report
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 12.

TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Bob Moehling, Public Works Director
PREPARED BY: James Ozouf, Senior Civil Engineer, CIP
SUBJECT:

Local Street Projects for the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017

ABSTRACT
Adoption of this Resolution will allow the City to continue receiving SB1 funding for the purpose of pavement rehabilitation projects.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 26-4938 entitled: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Murrieta, California, Approving the Fiscal Year 2026/27 Project List for the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 to the California Transportation Commission; and
Amend the Fiscal Year (FY) 2026/27 Operating Budget to establish a Revenue budget of $3,136,635 in the SB1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Fund (307).

PRIOR ACTION/VOTE
On June 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-4835, approving the project list for the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 for submittal to the California Transportation Commission (Vote: 4-0-1).

On June 3, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 25-4836, approving the Fiscal Year 2025/26 to 2029/30 Capital Improvement Plan (Vote: 5-0).

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT
This item aligns with the City Council goal of: planning, programming and creating infrastructure development relating to an administrative priority.

DISCUSSION
On April 28, 2017, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 1 (SB1) which is known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. The purpose of the bill was to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs on the state highway system and local streets. Funds are derived from increases in per CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
494
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 12.
critical safety needs on the state highway system and local streets. Funds are derived from increases in per gallon fuel excise taxes, increases in diesel fuel sales taxes, and increases in vehicle registration fees.

Beginning November 1, 2017, the State Controller started depositing various portions of the new funding to the newly created Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). The funds are apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to Streets and Highways Code (SHC) Section 2032(h) for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads systems.

SB 1 prioritizes this funding towards critical maintenance, rehabilitation, and safety improvements on state highways, local streets and roads, and bridges, as well as to improve the State’strade corridors, transit, and active transportation facilities. As codified in the Streets and Highways Code (SHC), RMRA local streets and roads allocations must be used for projects that include, but are not limited to, the following:
· Road maintenance and rehabilitation
· Safety projects
· Railroad grade separations
· Traffic control devices
· Complete street components, including active transportation purposes, pedestrian and bicycle safety projects, transit facilities, and drainage and storm-water capture projects in conjunction with any other allowable project.

As part of SB1’svarious accountability and transparency measures, the City is required to annually submit a proposed project list to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) and subsequently provide year end updates on the progress of previously proposed projects in order to receive RMRA funding. The RMRA funding must also be specifically differentiated from the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) funding, commonly known as Gas Tax. Each project utilizing RMRA funds is required to include the following information: project description, specific location, proposed schedule for its completion, and the estimated useful life.

The proposed projects for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026/27 are the following pavement resurfacing and asphalt overlay of:
· Whitewood Road from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Los Alamos Road This project is expected to utilize the anticipated $3,136,635 RMRA funding for FY 2026/27. Staff is proposing to also use the RMRA funds for contract services and staff time to complete the preliminary engineering required for the design and construction of the roadway project.

PUBLIC NOTICING
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).

FISCAL IMPACT
SB1 will provide RMRA funds totaling approximately $3,136,635 in FY 2026/27. Staff recommends an amendment to the FY 2026/27 Operating budget to establish a revenue budget of $3,136,635 in the SB1 Road CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
495
6/2/2026
Agenda Item No. 12.
amendment to the FY 2026/27 Operating budget to establish a revenue budget of $3,136,635 in the SB1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Fund (307).

ATTACHMENTS
ATT 1 - Resolution No. 26-4938
CITY OF MURRIETA Printed on 5/28/2026Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
496
RESOLUTION NO. 26-4938

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 20 26/27

PROJECT LIST FOR THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY
ACT OF 2017 TO THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION

COMMISSION

WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and

WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of Murrieta are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and

WHEREAS, Murrieta must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and

WHEREAS, Murrieta, will receive an estimated $3,136,635 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026/27 from SB 1; and

WHEREAS, this is the tenth year in which Murrieta is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable Murrieta to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and

WHEREAS, Murrieta used a Pavement Management Program to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the communities priorities for transportation investment; and

WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help Murrieta maintain and rehabilitate approximately 1.9 miles of streets/roads throughout the City this year and similar projects into the future; and

WHEREAS, the 2021 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that Murrieta’s streets and roads are in good condition and this revenue will help the City increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will maintain our streets and roads in a good condition; and

WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets 497
Resolution No. 26-4938

Page 2 of 3 ends

Murrieta City CouncilJune 2, 2026

Murrieta City Council
June 2, 2026