Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Murrieta City Council
September 15, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 15, 2026
Body
Murrieta City Council
Pages
103
Original file
33.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on murrieta.legistar.com. That file is the official record.

(2) The minimum parcel area for properties zoned RR can include adjacent area to the centerline of the public street right-of-way.
(3) For projects proposing a clustering configuration with detached single-family homes or within small attached unit configurations, please see 16.16.020 “Planned Residential Development General Standards” and 16.16.030 “Planned Residential Development Design Standards and Parameters” for requirements.
(4) For structures located within a Hillside Area, see the maximum height criteria as provided within Section 16.24 (Hillside Development) and applicability. “

SECTION 5. Section 16.08.020 (Residential Districts General Development Standards), Table 16.08-04 (Residential (Multi-Family) Zones General Development Standards) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“
TABLE 16.08-4

RESIDENTIAL (MULTI-FAMILY) ZONES

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Feature MF-1(5) MF-2 MF-3 MF-4
Minimum Parcel Size 5 acres 5 acres 5 acres 5 acres Minimum Parcel Width 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Density Range 10.1 - 15
du/acre

15.1 - 18.0
du/acre

18.1-29.0 du-
acre
Min. 30
du/acre
Minimum Livable Area 500 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft.

Setbacks
Street 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet
Interior 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet
Maximum Parcel Coverage 35% 35% 50% None
Maximum Height Limit 50 feet 50 feet 60 feet 100 feet Open Space (per dwelling unit)
Private Open Space 60 sq. ft./upper
floor
100 sq.
ft./ground floor
60 sq. ft./upper
floor
100 sq.
ft./ground floor
All units 50 sq.
ft.(2)
All units 50 sq.
ft.(2)
Common Open Space 200 sq. ft. 200 sq. ft. 150 sq. ft.(3) 150 sq. ft.(3) Recreational Amenities For projects
containing 25
or more
dwelling units,
provide one
recreational
amenity for
each 30
dwelling units
or fraction
thereof(4)
For projects
containing 25
or more
dwelling units,
provide one
recreational
amenity for
each 30
dwelling units
or fraction
thereof(4)
Minimum On-site Landscaping 10% of the site area
244
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 8 of 49 ends

Notes:

(1) When adjacent to existing single-family residential use or zone, the building setback from the nearest property line shall be 10 feet for the first 25 feet in height, above 25 feet in height the setback shall be 20 feet, and above 50 feet, the setback shall be 30 feet. (2) For stand-alone multi-family residential projects or as part of a mixed-use development, each residential unit shall be provided with at least one area of private open space accessible directly from the living area of the unit, in the form of fenced yard or patio, a deck, or balcony at a minimum area of 50 square feet. The minimum dimension, width, or depth of a balcony shall be 5 feet. (3) All common open space shall be conveniently located and accessible to all dwelling units on the site. Common open space may include landscaping, pedestrian paths and recreational amenities. In projects containing fewer than 10 units, the common open space shall have a minimum width and depth of 10 feet. In projects containing 10 or more or units, the minimum width and depth shall be 20 feet. (4) One common recreational amenity shall be provided for each 30 units or fraction thereof. The following listed amenities satisfy the above recreational facilities requirements. Recognizing that certain facilities serve more people than others, have a wider interest or appeal, and/or occupy more area, specified items may be counted as two amenities, as noted. In all cases, each square foot of land area devoted to a recreational amenity shall be credited as common open space on a 1:1 basis. a. Clubhouse (two)
b. Swimming Pool (two)
c. Tennis, Basketball or Racquetball court
d. Weightlifting facility
e. Children's playground equipment
f. Sauna or Jacuzzi
g. Day Care Facility (two)
h. Other recreational amenities deemed adequate by the director.

(5) For projects proposing a clustering configuration with detached single-family homes or within small attached unit configurations, please see 16.16.020 “Planned Residential Development General Standards” and 16.16.030 “Planned Residential Development Design Standards and Parameters” for requirements.
(6) For structures located within a Hillside Area, see the maximum height criteria as provided within Section 16.24 (Hillside Development) and applicability. “
SECTION 6. Section 16.14.010 (Purpose), Table 16.14-2 (Special Purpose Districts General Development Standards) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“
TABLE 16.14-2

SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Feature P&R C&I OS
Setbacks
245
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 9 of 49 ends

Street 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet
Interior 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
From Abutting Residential District 15 feet
Accessory Structures Same as Primary Structure
Maximum Height Limit(1) 35 feet(1) 50 feet(1) 35 feet(1) (1) For structures located within a Hillside Area, see the maximum height criteria as provided within Section 16.24 (Hillside Development) and applicability. “

SECTION 7. Section 16.18.080 (Height Measurement and Height Limit Exceptions) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“All structures shall meet the following standards relating to height, except for fences and walls, which shall comply with Chapter 16.22 (Fences, Hedges, and Walls).

A. Maximum Height. The height of structures shall not exceed the standard established by the applicable zoning district in Article II (Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses) or for structures within a Hillside Area under Section 16.24.020.A. In addition, the maximum height for structures on a specific parcel shall be measured as follows:

1. Establishing the high point and low point on the property as reference grade points as follows:
a. A measurement is taken from the lower of existing or proposed grade, 5 feet away from the lowest grade point around the structure in accordance with Figure 16.18 -1. This point shall be the low reference grade point. The highest point anywhere on the structure may not exceed the elevation of that low grade point by more than the allowable height plus the grade dif ferential between the low point of structure and high point of structure (excluding items as detailed under Section 16.18.080(B) (Exceptions to Height Limits)), but in such case where the actual grade differential exceeds 10 feet, only a maximum of 10 feet may be added to the maximum allowable height per the zone. The measurement is the difference in elevation between the highest and the lowest adjacent ground elevation surrounding the building.

FIGURE 16.18-1

MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS

246
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 10 of 49 ends

b. If the difference in elevation is 10 feet or less, the reference grade point is established at the highest adjacent ground elevation. See Figure 16.18-2. If the difference in elevation is greater than 10 feet, the reference grade point is established at 10 feet above the lowest adjacent ground elevation. See Figure 16.18-3. For stepped or terraced buildings, the building height is the overall height as illustrated in Figures 16.18-4 and Figure 16.18-5.

FIGURE(S) 16.18-2, -3, -4. -5

MEASUREMENT CRITERIA

c. For a project with a proposed pad configuration, the height of the structure measured by the vertical distance from the finished grade to the height of the roof line. See Figure 16.18-6.

247
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 11 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.18-6

MEASUREMENT WITH PAD CONFIGURATION

B. Exceptions to Height Limits. Exceptions to the height limits identified in this development code shall apply in the following manner:

1. Roof-mounted Features. Roof-mounted features including chimneys, cupolas, clock towers, elevator equipment rooms, equipment enclosures, and similar architectural features shall be allowed, up to a maximum of fifteen (15) feet above the allowed structure height. The total square footage of all structures above the heights allowed in the zoning districts shall not occupy more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total roof area of the structure. Greater height or area coverage may be allowed subject to the approval of a minor conditional use permit in compliance with Chapter 16.52.

2. Parapet Walls. Fire or parapet walls may extend up to four feet above the allowable height limit of the structure.

3. Public Assembly, Hotels, Class "A" Office and Public Structures. Places of public assembly including churches, schools, assembly halls, Class "A" office buildings greater than three (3) stories, hotels and other similar structures may exceed the established height limit by one (1) foot for every two (2) feet that the minimum required front, rear and side yard setbacks are increased. The increase in the front, rear and side yard setbacks is determined by averaging the total of the increased building setbacks at the closest point on all sides. The maximum additional height allowed is thirty (30) feet above the height limit established for the applicable zoning district. This exception shall not apply when the site is adjacent to single-family zoned property. This exception may be used in conjunction with the height exception for rooftop equipment.

4. Telecommunications Facilities. Telecommunication facilities, including antennae, poles, towers, and necessary mechanical appurtenances, may be authorized to exceed the height limit established for the applicable zoning district, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in compliance with Chapter

16.52. 5. Basement. A basement is defined as a story that has its floor surface below the adjoining finished grade as both conditioned and unconditioned space per the California Building and Residential Codes.”

SECTION 8. Section 16.22.050 (Measurement of Fence or Wall Height) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
248
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 12 of 49 ends

“16.22.050 Measurement of Fence or Wall Height.

Where there is a difference in the ground level between two adjacent parcels, the height of a fence or wall constructed along the property line shall be determined by using the finish grade of the highest contiguous parcel.”

SECTION 9. Section 16.22.060 (Walls Required Between Different Zoning Districts) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“16.22.060 Walls Required Between Different Zoning Districts.

Walls shall be provided and maintained between different zoning districts as follows:

A. Where a nonresidential or multi-family zoning district abuts a residential zoning district, a solid masonry wall of six feet in height shall be constructed on the zone boundary line. Walls may be constructed higher than six feet if the viewshed is not impeded and is subject to the approval of the Director;

B. Where a BP or IG zoning district abuts another zoning district, a solid masonry wall six feet in height shall be constructed on the zone boundary line;

C. Walls shall be of solid masonry construction and shall be of a decorative design when in view of public rights-of-way subject to approval of the director; and

D. The director may waive or modify requirements for walls between different zoning districts where a solid masonry wall already exists on the contiguous property if the following findings can be made:

1. The existing wall meets or can be modified to conform to the intent of this chapter;

2. Suitable landscaping can be installed adjacent to the existing wall to supplement and enhance the desired physical separation;

3. The existing wall can be protected to prevent vehicle damage, if necessary, and

4. Concurrence of the adjacent property owner can be obtained, to modify the existing wall to meet the requirements of this chapter.”

SECTION 10. Chapter 16.24 (Hillside Development) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“16.24.010 Purpose.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide regulations for the development of areas in the City that, because of their topography, require special consideration to ensure that they are developed in a way that substantially maintains their natural character and environmental and aesthetic values to implement the City’s General Plan, and to provide for the safety, health, and welfare of the public by:

249
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 13 of 49 ends

A. Providing guidelines and standards for development in visually sensitive Hillside Areas to minimize the adverse impacts of grading and to promote the goals and objectives of the City’s General Plan;

B. Maintaining an environmental equilibrium consistent with existing vegetation, wildlife, soils, geology, slopes, and drainage patterns, and to preserve natural topography and scenic character, including canyons, creeks, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines whenever feasible;

C. Reasonably consider development proposals that feature water conservation and aquifer recharge techniques;

D. Reasonably consider development proposals that are sensitive to fire, flood, slide, erosion, pollution, or other safety hazards;

E. Reasonably consider sensitive development through flexible design and innovative arrangement of building sites by utilizing variable lot sizes, clustering, and setback variations;

F. Utilizing nontraditional design standards for streets and hillside grading where development quality and public safety are not affected;

G. Reasonably consider developments that incorporate desirable existing features of land (e.g., natural vegetation, viewsheds, topographic features);

H. Protecting significant natural areas for ecologic purposes, educational, and other scientific study purposes; 1. Encouraging the use of drought-tolerant plant material to protect slopes from soil erosion and slippage, preserve natural watershed, minimize fire hazard, and minimize the scarring and deformation of the natural landscape;

I. Limiting the impact of cut slopes on adjacent developed and undeveloped properties; and

J. Providing for appropriate intensity of development (e.g., density, massing, etc.) through a variety of design techniques to ensure that development intensity decreases as slopes become steeper (e.g., lot sizes appropriate for steeper topography and separation of structures sufficient to preserve a viewshed).

16.24.020 Applicability.

A. Location Consideration for Analysis. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code, the standards contained in this chapter apply to uses and structures within Hillside Areas that have a slope twenty-five (25) percent or greater and as designated within the boundaries of a Hillside Overlay Map.

Additionally, please refer to Table 16.24-1 (Undeveloped And Developed Standards And Processing Requirements), Section 16.02.020 (Exemptions from Land Use Permit Requirements), and Section

16.24.080 (Exceptions) for activities and features exempt from review.

B. Basis for Slope Determinations. Slope determinations shall be based upon citywide contour data as provided on the City’s website under the Geographic Information System webpage under Interactive Mapping.

C. Development Plan Permit Required. Hillside developments shall be subject to the approval of a development plan permit in compliance with Chapter 16.56, unless exempt per adopted City policy or State Law (Example: Accessory Dwelling Unit).
250
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 14 of 49 ends

D. Applicability Criteria. The development standards, guidelines, and provisions of this chapter shall be applied to those portions of land with a predominance of natural slopes exceeding twenty-five (25) percent or greater and areas that are integrally contiguous. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to projects relating to subdivisions, permits, uses, structures, specific plans, master development plans, and associated site plans for development review as described under Table 16.24-1 (Undeveloped and Developed Standards and Processing Requirements), except as specifically exempted by Section

16.02.020 (Exemptions from Land Use Permit Requirements), and Section 16.24.080 (Exceptions).

TABLE 16.24-1

UNDEVELOPED AND DEVELOPED STANDARDS AND PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS

Feature/Standard Undeveloped /
Natural
Both Undeveloped
and Developed
Portions of a Hillside
Area Site
Developed
Hillside Development
Plan Permit Applies.

Applies to the
Undeveloped / Natural
portions of the site that
were not previously
legally
disturbed/developed.

Exempt from Permit
for Developed
Portions where the
scope of work
involves ≤ 50 cubic
yards for flatwork,
pools, spas, or other
areas of the site that
have been legally
disturbed, as described
under Section

16.02.020
(Exemptions from
Land Use Permit
Requirements).

Exempt from Permit
for Developed
Portions where the
scope of work
involves ≤ 50 cubic
yards for flatwork,
pools, spas, or other
areas of the site that
have been legally
disturbed, and as
described under
Section 16.02.020
(Exemptions from
Land Use Permit
Requirements).

Permit Evidence for
“Developed”
Classification
N/A

Grading permits and
records,
Building Permits /
Certificates of
Occupancy,
Grading Permits and
Records,
Building permits /
Certificates of
Occupancy,
Approved Grading
Plans
251
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 15 of 49 ends

Approved Grading
Plans

Agricultural Uses as
it relates to a
“Developed”
Classification
N/A
“Developed” as it
relates to a disturbed
hillside area condition
does not include
agricultural uses or
improvements
customarily associated
with agricultural
operations, including
but not limited to crop
cultivation, grazing,
orchards, vineyards,
irrigation systems,
fencing, or agricultural
access roads. The
installation or
maintenance of such
agricultural
improvements shall
not, by itself, cause a
hillside area to be
considered
“developed” for
purposes of this
Chapter.
“Developed” as it
relates to a disturbed
hillside area condition
does not include
agricultural uses or
improvements
customarily associated
with agricultural
operations, including
but not limited to crop
cultivation, grazing,
orchards, vineyards,
irrigation systems,
fencing, or agricultural
access roads. The
installation or
maintenance of such
agricultural
improvements shall
not, by itself, cause a
hillside area to be
considered
“developed” for
purposes of this
Chapter.

Evidence for
“Developed”
Classification
without Permit
History
N/A

Aerial Imagery.

Subject to review by
the Director for a
determination. If there
is a disagreement with
the determination, it
shall be referred to the
Planning Commission
for a final
determination.

Aerial Imagery.

Subject to review by
the Director for a
determination. If there
is a disagreement with
the determination, it
shall be referred to the
Planning Commission
for a final
determination.

252
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 16 of 49 ends

Grading Permit Applies.

Applies to the
Undeveloped / Natural
portions of the subject
site that were not
previously legally
disturbed.

Applies if soil
disturbance exceeds 50
cubic yards and is
determined to be
exempt by the City
Engineer, per Section

15.52.030 (Permits
Required) and Section

15.52.040 (Permit
Exceptions).

For the developed
portion of a subject
site, a grading permit
is required if soil
disturbance exceeds 50
cubic yards and is
determined to be not
exempt by the City
Engineer, per review
of the criteria as
described under
Section 15.52.030
(Permits Required)
and Section 15.52.040
(Permit Exceptions).

Fine Grade and
Drainage Review N/A

Subject to City
Engineer review for
the developed portions
of the site, unless the
Fine Grade and
Drainage Review is
determined not to be
eligible, per Section

15.52.030 (Permits
Required) and Section

15.52.040 (Permit
Exceptions).

Subject to City
Engineer review,
unless the Fine Grade
Drainage Review is
determined not to be
eligible, per Section

15.52.030 (Permits
Required) and Section

15.52.040 (Permit
Exceptions).

Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs) &
Accessory Structures

Approval of an ADU
is tolled for any
required discretionary
actions (e.g. grading
permit) per State law.

Approval of an ADU
is tolled for any
required discretionary
actions (e.g. grading
permit) per State law.

Approval of an ADU
is tolled for any
required discretionary
actions (e.g. grading
permit) per State law.

253
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 17 of 49 ends

Approval of Accessory
Structures, 1,000 sq.
ft. or greater, requires
a Hillside
Development Permit

Approval of Accessory
Structures, 1,000 sq.
ft. or greater, requires
a Hillside
Development Permit

Approval of Accessory
Structures, 1,000 sq.
ft. or greater, requires
a Hillside
Development Permit

All Projects located
in a designated
Hillside Area

All components are
subject to hillside
design standards

All components are
subject to hillside
design standards

All components are
subject to hillside
design standards

16.24.030 Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter the following definitions shall apply:

Agricultural Use. “Developed” as it relates to a disturbed hillside area condition does not include agricultural uses or improvements customarily associated with agricultural operations, including but not limited to crop cultivation, grazing, orchards, vineyards, irrigation systems, fencing, or agricultural access roads. The installation or maintenance of such agricultural improvements shall not, by itself, cause a hillside area to be considered “developed” for purposes of this Chapter.

City. The City of Murrieta, state of California, referred to in this development code as the “City.”

City Engineer. The director of Public Works/City Engineer of the city or their duly delegated representative.

City Manager. The official employed by an elected council to direct the administration of the City. See Chapter 2.08 “City Manager”

Clearing. The removal of vegetation (grass, brush, trees, and similar plant types) by hand or mechanical means (e.g. brushing, grubbing).

Cluster Development. A concept where structures are grouped on certain portions of a site, frequently of different shapes and sizes, surrounded by large expanses of open space.

Contour. A line drawn on a plan that connects points of equal elevation.

Cut. An act by which soil, sand, gravel, or rock is cut into, dug, quarried, uncovered, removed, or relocated, and shall include the conditions resulting therefrom.

Daylight Line. The line between the finished grade and natural terrain drawn by connecting points where pro-posed contours meet existing contours.

Developed. Means land that has been altered from its natural state through grading, excavation, fill placement, construction, paving, landscaping, or installation of infrastructure improvements.

Director. See Section 16.46.050 “Director.”

Elevation. Height or distance above mean sea level.
254
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 18 of 49 ends

Erosion. The process by which the soil and rock components are worn away and removed from one place to another by natural forces (e.g., wind, water)

Fill. A deposit of soil, sand, gravel, rock, or other material placed by artificial means.

Finished Grade. The final elevation of the ground surface after development, that is in conformance with approved plans.

Grading. To bring an existing surface to a designed form by excavating, filling, or landforming operations.

Contour Grading. A grading concept designed to result in earth shaping that resembles natural terrain characteristics.

Conventional Grading. A grading concept that results in simple, straight forward, cut and fill lines and even slopes.

Landform Grading. A grading method that replicates the irregular shapes of the natural ground surface.

Landform graded land surfaces are characterized by continuous series of concave and convex forms interspersed with mounds that blend into profiles, nonlinearity in plan view, varying slope gradients, and significant transition zones, between man-made and natural land surfaces.

Hillside Area. Means those areas specifically designated on a Hillside Overlay Map as adopted by the City Council under Section 16.24.100.

Mass Grading. The movement of large quantities of earth over large areas. Disruption of the majority of the on-site surface terrain resulting in a successive pad/terrace configuration.

Minimal Grading. A grading concept designed to minimize excavation and filling. Allows the movement of earth for projects (e.g., as individual building foundations, driveways, local roads, and utility excavation). The concept is associated with roads conforming closely to natural contours and with structures being built on natural terrain.

Pad. A level area created by grading to accommodate development.

Prominent Ridge. A ridge or hill location that is visible from Interstate 15, Interstate 215, or from an arterial or secondary street, that forms part of the skyline or is seen as a distinct edge against a backdrop of land.
255
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 19 of 49 ends

Ridge. An extended, narrow, conspicuous elevation of land generally between valleys.

Slope. An inclined ground surface, the inclination of which is expressed as a ratio of the vertical distance (rise), or change in elevation, to the horizontal distance (run). The percent of a given slope is determined by dividing the rise by the run, multiplied by one hundred (100).

Undeveloped. Means land within a hillside area that remains in a substantially natural state and has not been significantly altered by grading, construction, paving, or installation of infrastructure improvements.

Slope, Man-made. A manufactured slope consisting wholly or partially of either cut or filled material.

Slope, Natural. A slope that is not man-made.

Slope, Natural. A slope that is not man-made that exceeds twenty-five (25) percent.

Slope Ratio. The relationship of a slope's horizontal length to vertical height, with the height specified as one (e.g. 2:1).

Slope Transition. The area where a slope plane changes to meet the natural terrain or a level graded area either vertically or horizontally.

16.24.040 Application Submittal Requirements.

256
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 20 of 49 ends

Applications for development shall comply with the submittal requirements of this chapter. When a development project is a specific plan or master development plan, the submittal requirements shall be incorporated in the appropriate sections of the corresponding documents. If adequate detailed studies are provided with the specific plan and/or master development plan, subsequent implementing development applications shall be reviewed for substantial conformance with these plans.

Application filing requirements are as follows:

A. Natural Features Map. This map shall identify slope banks, ridgelines, canyons, natural drainage courses, United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) blueline streams, rock outcroppings, sensitive biological habitats, cultural resources, and other natural features for the purposes of project review and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis.

B. Overall Conceptual Grading Plan. An overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted at a minimum scale of one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet). The plan shall include the following items:

1. A legend with symbols identifying the following, but not limited to: high point, low point, spot elevations, pad, top of wall, top of footing, top of curb, top of ground surface on both sides of a retaining wall, and planned drainage improvements;

2. A separate map shall be provided with proposed cut and fill areas, depths of these identified areas shown in five-foot topographic lines. Quantities of each cut and fill area shall be identified and calculated as a percentage of the total site area. The cut and fill areas shall be either colored green and red, cross- hatched, or screened to delineate each respective area;

3. Contours for existing and proposed topographic conditions shall be provided within submitted plan exhibits. Existing contours shall be depicted with continuous screened lines and proposed contours shall be depicted as above except with a solid line. Contours shall be shown at minimum intervals of two feet of change in elevation. Elevations of less than two feet shall be depicted with spot elevations; and

4. Additional information as required to assist with review of the project.

C. Drainage Map. A conceptual drainage and flood control facilities map describing planned drainage improvements. The map shall utilize City standards or an acceptable alternate as determined by the City Engineer or their designee.

D. Slope Profile Drawings. Cross-section slope profiles shall be included with the slope analysis.

Additional profiles may be required as determined by the City Engineer or their designee. The slope profiles shall:

1. Be drawn at the same scale and indexed, or keyed, to the slope analysis map, grading plan, and project site map. Both vertical and horizontal scales shall be indicated;

2. Show existing and proposed topography, structures, and infrastructure. Proposed topography, structures, and infrastructures shall be drawn with a thin, solid line. Existing topography and features shall be drawn with a dashed line;

3. Extend at a minimum of one hundred (100) feet outside the project site boundary to clearly show the impact on adjacent property. Additional distance may be necessary to determine off-site terrain and features;
257
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 21 of 49 ends

4. Be drawn along those portions of the subject site where:

a. The greatest portion of the site where alteration of existing topography is proposed;

b. The most intensive or massive portion of the site where development is proposed (e.g. where structures are proposed);

c. Where proposed grading would potentially impact existing natural drainage conditions.

5. At least two of the slope profiles shall be roughly parallel to each other and roughly perpendicular to existing contour lines. At least one other slope profile shall be roughly at a ninety (90) degree angle to the other slope profiles and existing contour lines.

F. Indicate Source of Data. Indicate the datum, source, data, and scale.

G. Geotechnical Report. A geotechnical and soils report shall be prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer to City standards and provide in sufficient detail to substantiate and support the design concepts presented in the application. Additional environmental technical studies and investigations, including, but not limited to, hydrologic, seismic, access/circulation, cultural, tribal cultural, and biological resources may be required to help in the determination of the buildable area of a subject site for consistency with project review and for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis.

H. Objective Design Guidelines. Objective design guidelines shall be provided for projects that are to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Otherwise, illustrative building elevations showing all sides of the structure shall be provided.

I. No Grading Proposed. See 16.24.080 (Exceptions) for applicability.

J. Additional Information. The following items may be required if determined necessary by the City Engineer or their designee to aid in the analysis of the proposed project:

1. A line of sight or view analysis;

2. Photographic and/or computer-generated graphic renderings; or

3. A topographic model and/or large-scale detailed partial model;

16.24.050 Project Review Procedures.

Projects within designated hillside areas shall be subject to review and approval by the director or the commission in compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

A. Director Approval. The director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny development proposal applications when the following conditions apply:

1. Development plan permits;

2. Extensions of time; or
258
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 22 of 49 ends

3. Building permit reviews.

B. Commission Approval. The commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny development proposal applications when one or more of the following conditions apply:

1. When padded building sites are proposed, or

2. Proposals referred to the commission by the director.

C. Modification of Requirements. The commission may modify or waive a development standard:

1. When an improved or more environmentally sensitive design would result. Further, where it can be demonstrated that imposing the objective hillside development standards would either render a parcel unbuildable and create a loss of its reasonable economic use, or place an undue restriction on the improvement of the property, development consistent with the City’s General Plan shall be allowed subject to approval by the Planning Commission, if the following findings can be made:

a. The site is physically suitable for the design and siting of the proposed development. The proposed development will result in minimum disturbance of environmentally sensitive areas;

b. The grading in connection with the development would not result in soil erosion, silting of lower slopes, flooding, severe scarring, create other geological instability conditions, or a fire hazard condition that would affect the public’s health, safety and general welfare for the City, as determined by the City Engineer.

16.24.060 Hillside Development Standards.

The following are minimum standards and shall apply to a use, development, or alteration of land in compliance with Section 16.24.020 (Applicability). These standards are supplemented by the provisions of the development guidelines contained in Section 16.24.070 (Hillside Development Guidelines) of this chapter.

A. Hillside Slope Categories. The following categories serve as guidelines for determining the applicability of hillside conditions at a subject site.

TABLE 16.24-2

HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

% Natural
Slope
Category
Standards
Under 25% This is not considered a hillside condition. Please note that slope calculations shall not be rounded to the nearest whole number.
25% and
Over but
less than
50%
This is a hillside condition. Development within this slope category is limited to the less visually prominent slopes of a subject site, where it can be demonstrated that grading, vegetation removal, safety, aesthetic, and other environmental impacts are minimized. Potential impacts from site access and roadways shall be minimized by following natural contours or using grade separations. Proposed structures shall blend with the natural landform through their shape, 259
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 23 of 49 ends

material, and utilization of natural occurring color(s). Please note that slope calculations shall not be rounded to the nearest whole number.
50% and
over(1)
This is an excessive slope condition, and development is prohibited. (1) This applies to the property as a whole.

B. Site Design.

1. Projects shall incorporate clustering, variable setbacks, multiple orientations, and other site planning techniques to preserve open spaces, protect natural features, and offer views to residents.

2. When clustering techniques are utilized, the minimum lot sizes may be decreased to five thousand (5,000) square feet when it is necessary to preserve sensitive lands (e.g., hillsides, creeks, habitat areas, etc.). Lots may be allowed smaller than five thousand (5,000) square feet, but not smaller than four thousand (4,000) square feet, for up to twenty (20) percent of the total approved lots and only under an approved specific plan when necessary to preserve sensitive and Hillside Areas. Lots under five thousand (5,000) square feet are prohibited in slope areas of twenty-five (25) percent or greater.

C. Driveways and Roadways.

1. Driveways shall be designed in a manner as to when a vehicle is entering a public and /or private streets, adequate sight distance shall be maintained as determined by the City Engineer or their designee.

2. Driveways shall not be located within three feet of a side property line. Exceptions to this standard may be considered based on lot size, percentage of slope, drainage facilities and use as a common driveway by the City Engineer or their designee.

3. Only slopes less than fifty (50) percent (2:1) shall be permitted adjacent to driveways.

4. Driveway grades above fifteen (15) percent may only be considered by the City Engineer or their designee when driveways are aligned with the natural contours of the land, and are necessary to achieve site design, and safety considerations to the satisfaction of the building and safety official, City Engineer, or designee, and fire code official. Design considerations shall be employed, including the use of vertical curves. On proposed driveways with a slope greater than fifteen (15) percent, a coarse, all-weather paving material (e.g. asphalt or concrete), or grooves for traction, shall be incorporated into the design.

5. Roadways shall conform to the natural landform. Significant alterations to the physical and visual character of a hillside shall be avoided by eliminating large notches in ridgelines and wide straight alignments. Modified or reduced-width road sections and split sections shall be considered in the layout of hillside streets to reduce grading and cuts in topography while allowing access for fire trucks and other emergency vehicles.
260
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 24 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-1

ROADWAY PLACEMENT

6. Where road construction is proposed, the standards shall be consistent with those identified for high fire hazard areas, the California Fire Code, and with City design standards.

7. The extent of vegetation and visual disruption shall be minimized by the combined use of retaining structures and regrading to approximate natural slopes. The view along a street frontage shall be screened with landscaping and the maintenance of views shall be preserved as demonstrated on the 261
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 25 of 49 ends

project plans. The use of terraced walls and landscaping is a recommended design technique to address this visual impact.

8. Wet utilities shall be placed in the road right-of-way, where feasible, and approved by the reviewing agency.

9. Scaled roadway drainage facilities and grades shall be provided consistent with City design standards.

D. Architecture.

1. The maximum structure height shall be thirty (30) feet. Refer to Section 16.18.080.A (Maximum Height) for additional criteria on how to calculate the maximum height for a sloped parcel.

a. Architectural Projections Allowed. Architectural projections and variations in roof design are encouraged. Projections above the maximum height limits for architectural features may be allowed subject to approval by the Director.

2. Reduction of front yard setbacks may be considered in order to minimize rear yard grading.

3. Building materials and color schemes shall be of earth tones and the value (lightness or darkness) of the specific hue shall be as close to that of the immediately surrounding landscape as possible as demonstrated on the project plans.

4. Treated wood or materials of a wood-like appearance, having the necessary fire retardant characteristics are a design option for exterior surfaces. Use of other natural materials (e.g., river rock) is a design option as well. The reflectivity of exposed surfaces (walls, roofs, windows, frames, and paved surfaces) shall be mitigated with the incorporation of overhangs, trellises, planting, and similar features.

5. Exterior lighting shall be located and shielded in compliance with Section 16.18.100 (Lighting).

E. Walls and Fences.

TABLE 16.24-3
RETAINING WALLS – WITHIN HILLSIDE AREAS
Criteria
Up to Three Feet Within Front or
Street-Side Setback
Walls within the required front yard
or street-side setback shall not
exceed three feet in height, shall be
separated by a minimum of three
feet, and shall incorporate
landscaping to screen the wall(s).

Line-of-Sight Locations/Visibility
Triangles
For any required line–of–sight
locations, or visibility triangles, a
maximum of thirty inches in height
shall be permitted.
262
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 26 of 49 ends

Up to Six Feet. Where multiple terraced retaining
walls are designed to retain larger
slopes, they shall not exceed six
feet in height. Refer to Figure

16.24-2.

Over Six Feet Prohibited, unless the applicant
seeks a waiver or modification. The
director may waive or modify the
requirements of this standard if the
following findings can be made:

That the waiver of modification, as
applied to the project, will not
adversely impact adjoining
properties; and

That the waiver or modification will
not be contrary to the public health,
safety, and general welfare; and

That the waiver or modification will
ensure that the retaining wall
incorporates additional screening
measures where a wall would be
visible from the public right-of-
way, including, but not limited to,
the use of earth-tone colors and/or
landscaping, in order to maintain
visual compatibility with the
surrounding hillside area.

Over Six Feet and as Part of the
Structure.

Walls that are an integral part of the
primary structure may exceed six
feet in height; however, their visual
impact shall be mitigated through
contour grading and landscape
treatment. Refer to Figure 16.24-3.

Required Offset At six feet in height, a retaining
wall shall be separated by a
minimum of six feet horizontally.

Refer to Figure 16.24-2.

263
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 27 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-2

HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALLS

3. Walls that are an integral part of the primary structure may exceed six feet in height; however, their visual impact shall be mitigated through contour grading and landscape treatment.

FIGURE 16.24-3

RETAINING WALL AS PART OF PRIMARY STRUCTURE

1. Retaining walls may be permitted when used to reduce grading, preserve natural features, or improve soil stabilization.
264
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 28 of 49 ends

2. Split‑face block, crib walls, keystone systems, retaining walls with stone veneer, and similar designs may be utilized.

3. The color palette and materials of a retaining wall or similar wall system should utilize earth‑tone colors and be consistent with the predominant hues and materials of the adjacent hillsides.

4. If landscaping is proposed to be utilized in conjunction with a retaining or similar wall system, plant materials should be appropriate for the local climate and suited to the wall’s sun exposure.

FIGURE 16.24-4

EXAMPLE OF DECORATIVE RETAINING WALL WITH A STONE VENEER

265
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 29 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-5

EXAMPLE OF SPLIT FACE RETAINING WALL

FIGURE 16.24-6

EXAMPLE OF KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL

266
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 30 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-7

EXAMPLE OF KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL WITH LANDSCAPING

5. Retaining Walls visible from the public right-of-way shall be designed to provide variation in placement, use of planters, differing materials, and modulation of the wall plane to help emulate the pre- existing hillside contours.

6. Retaining Walls shall follow landform grading shapes and contours.

7. Tubular steel or wrought-iron safety fencing may be necessary in conjunction with retaining wall locations. If necessary, these wall locations are to provide for landscape safety maintenance personnel.

Construction shall be consistent with the California Building Code (CBC) and related codes.

F. Landscaping. Revegetation in hillside areas shall reflect the visual patterns found naturally in local canyons and valleys. The landscaping as viewed from urban areas and the arterial roadway system shall mask and screen man-made structures.

1 . Indigenous, or naturalized plants that blend naturally with the landscape shall be utilized in areas where planting is required. The plant selection shall be deep-rooted, drought-tolerant, and fire-resistant.

2. Natural landform planting shall be used to soften manufactured slopes, reduce the impact of development on steep slopes or ridgelines. and provide erosion control. These landscape techniques shall serve to reintroduce landscape patterns that occur naturally. 267
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 31 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-8

NATURAL LANDFORM PLANTING

3. A “vegetative backdrop” shall be maintained by replanting the site with native trees and/or providing the same vegetation that was removed, consistent with City landscaping standards. As demonstrated in the project plans, the proposed vegetation shall be sized and spaced appropriately to screen structures from the growth of the species at maturity and to preserve the appearance of the natural skyline.

268
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 32 of 49 ends

4. The surface of graded or disturbed slopes with three feet or greater vertical height shall be protected against damage by erosion through the planting of deep rooted ground cover as demonstrated on the project plans. Slopes exceeding eight feet in vertical height shall be planted with ground cover and a combination of shrubs and trees that have a high "root-to-shoot" ratio. The size of shrubs and trees shall be determined based on the individual project area as deemed appropriate by the department and/or Planning Commission.

5. Jute mesh or an equivalent shall be required when planting occurs between August fifteenth and April fifteenth, and when determined, as necessary, by a soils engineer and/or licensed landscape architect. Jute mesh shall be used in combination with required plantings as outlined in the slope landscaping guidelines available on the City of Murrieta’s website for optimal long-term slope stabilization.

6. Indigenous, native vegetation shall be retained and supplemented within canyons and along natural drainage courses where grading does not occur, provided that it conforms with fuel modification and tire prevention plans.

7. Common open space areas, front, and side yards adjacent to a street shall be landscaped and irrigated consistent with City landscaping and fire protection standards. These areas shall be provided with native plant materials that blend with the natural character of the surrounding landscape.

8. In order to protect slopes from soil erosion and failure, and to facilitate revegetation, and automatic irrigation system shall be installed on slopes with planting. Design and operation of the irrigation system shall respect the special conditions that exist in hillside situations specific to maintaining slope stabilization and integrity. In all cases, the emphasis shall be toward using plant materials that may eventually not need to be irrigated; therefore, temporary irrigation systems may be used as approved by the City’s landscape architect and City Engineer. Water and energy conservation techniques shall be utilized (e.g. drip irrigation, alluvial rockscape, etc.). Where irrigation systems are installed above ground, ultraviolet light-resistant brown line, or other approved color, shall be used.

9. A permanent fuel modification area shall be required around projects that are located within high or very-high fire severity zone, adjacent to a high or very-high fire severity zone, or exposed to hazardous fire areas for the purpose of fire protection. The fuel modification area shall be maintained by its owners, a homeowners' association, or other public nonprofit agency, or conveyed within a public easement.

Adequate provisions shall be made for the continual maintenance of these areas, and the fire code official may require brush, vegetation, combustible item(s), or debris to be removed, cleared, and maintained, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 8.32 of the Municipal Code. Where feasible, fuel modification areas shall be designated as common open space rather than private open space. The recommended width of the fuel modification area shall be based on applicable building and fire codes and the recommendations of the fire code official with consideration given to:

a. A worst-case Santa Ana wind condition;

b. The natural ungraded slope of the land within the project and in the areas adjacent to the project;

c. Fuel load;

d. All weather access to the project by fire suppression equipment and personnel, access directly to the fuel modified area, and egress out of the project area in case of evacuation;

269
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 33 of 49 ends

e. The on-site availability of water that can be used for firefighting purposes with regard to fire flows, water pressure, and duration;

f. "Built-in" fire protection within structures (i.e., sprinklers etc.);

g. Soil erosion and sediment control measures;

h. The fire department fuel modification policy and the Wild Urban Interface Undesirable Plants & Trees list;

i. Fuel modification zones for landscaping as outlined by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

10. Fuel modification areas shall also incorporate soil erosion and sediment control measures to alleviate permanent scarring and accelerated erosion.

G. Grading.

1. Grading shall not take place on natural slopes that exceed fifty (50) percent.

2. Slopes created by grading of the site shall not exceed fifty (50) percent or 2:1. Slopes exceeding 2:1 but less than or equal to 1.5:1 may be considered upon additional analysis by a licensed geotechnical engineer. Slopes shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in height between terraces or benches, except that the Planning Commission may permit slopes exceeding these dimensions where the slopes will result in a natural appearance and will not create geological or erosion hazards. The soils report and stabilization study shall be subject to third-party review prior to approval by the City.

3. In order to help address visual impacts at Prominent Ridgelines, the use of the combination of naturally occurring vegetation (trees/shrubs) and proposed landscaping shall be implemented to screen proposed structures at these locations. Alternatively, earth tone colors can be used as a design option if landscape screening is not feasible. Additionally, any required Fuel Modification Zone and California Fire Code standards shall be considered in the design of this screening method, blending with the terrain and existing vegetation.

4. Clearing and/or grubbing, excavation, and other earth disturbances shall not be initiated on hillside areas prior to the issuance of a grading permit, with the exception of county/state authorized soils remediation operations, drill holes, and exploratory trenches for the collection of geologic and soil data or for weed abatement activities. Trenches are to be backfilled and erosion treatment provided where slopes exceed twenty-five (25) percent.

5. Manufactured cut and fill slopes exceeding ten feet in height which would be either exposed to public view, or are adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas, shall be landform or contour graded, where physically feasible, so that their ultimate appearance will resemble a natural slope. This will include slopes adjacent to streets and highways, slopes, adjacent to parks, schools, open spaces, and other public facilities and other prominent slopes.

6. Landform grading shall be used where zero to twenty-five (0-25) percent (non-hillside) slopes intersect with twenty-five to fifty (25-50) percent (hillside) slopes. Proper transitioning from manufactured slopes created by conventional grading methods to natural slopes shall be achieved 270
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 34 of 49 ends

gradually and naturally through the use of radii or irregular curvilinear shapes that will blend into the adjoining topography tangentially and not create abrupt changes.

7. Fill slopes shall not be placed perpendicularly across a canyon. Straight line cut of fill slopes shall not be made to appear like a dam. The terminus of the fill shall, instead, be concave in shape to restore the canyon appearance. This concave configuration shall be in combination with the use of substantially flatter slope ratios (4:1, 3.5:1, 3: I) at or near the center of this indentation. Symmetrical or unsymmetrical con-cave configurations shall be used depending upon the adjoining or underlying topographic characteristics.

8. Minimal radius rounding at the edges of cut and fill slopes is not an acceptable method.

Transitioning from manufactured slopes to natural slopes shall be achieved gradually and naturally through the use of radii or irregular curvilinear shapes that will blend into the adjoining topography tangentially and not create abrupt changes.

9. In the planning, design, and development of public utilities and infrastructure, every reasonable effort as demonstrated shall be made to minimize grading impacts and incorporates a design that follows the natural contours and character of the land.

10. Side yard slopes and rear yard slopes (less than twenty (20) feet in height) whose view is blocked by future structures need not have landform design applied.

11. Grading shall be phased so that prompt revegetation or construction will control erosion. Where possible, only those areas that will be built on, resurfaced, or landscaped shall be disturbed. Top soil shall be stockpiled during the rough grading phase and utilized on pads or revegetated habitat areas, upon the recommendation of the soils engineer.

12. Applicable requirements of the City and state shall be complied with in conjunction with the latest National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit prior to the issuance of a grading permit. This may include, but is not limited to, a Grading Plan, and Erosion Control Plan, Best Management Plan (During Construction and Post-Construction Phases) and Construction Monitoring Program.

H. Drainage.

1. Debris basins, energy-dissipating devices, and down drains shall be provided, where necessary, to reduce erosion when grading is undertaken in the hillside areas. Natural drainage courses shall be retained where health and safety can be maintained. Drainage courses retained in a natural state shall be protected from grading activity. In instances where a crossing is required, a natural crossing and bank protection shall be a design option over steel and concrete systems. Where drainage structures are required, they shall be naturalized with coloration, plant materials, native rocks and/or concealment with grading techniques.

2. Drainage channels, slope drainage devices, interceptor drains and terrace drains shall be placed in less visible locations as demonstrated on the project plans and evaluated for erosion. Down drains shall be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face. In this manner they will be built into the overall landform of the slope. They shall also receive a naturalizing treatment, which may include native rock, colored concrete, and/or landscaping so that the structure appears as an integral part of the environment. In all cases, a concrete liner shall be used in addition to a naturalizing treatment as demonstrated on the project plans and evaluated for erosion. 271
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 35 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-9

NATURALIZED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LANDFORMING

3. Cross-lot drainage usage shall be minimized. In situations where this is not possible using conventional design, optional techniques (e.g., single loaded streets, reduced densities, etc.) shall be considered. Use of cross-lot drainage may be considered only after demonstration that this method will not adversely affect the proposed lots or adjacent properties, and that it is required in order to minimize the amount of grading which would result with conventional drainage practices.

4. Where cross lot drainage is utilized, the following shall apply:

a. Project Interiors. One lot may drain across one other lot if a maintenance easement is provided within either an improved, open “V”-swale gutter which has a naturalized appearance, or within a closed drainage pipe that shall be a minimum twelve (12) inches in diameter. This drainage shall be conveyed either to a public street or to a drainage easement. If drainage is conveyed to a private easement, it shall be maintained by its owners or a Homeowners' Association; otherwise, the drainage shall be conveyed to a public easement. The easement width shall be determined on an individual basis and shall be dependent on appropriate hydrologic studies and access requirements. Irrigation lines shall be placed above swales to minimize the impacts in the event of a system failure. When irrigation lines cross an open “V”-swale they shall be placed into a galvanized pipe, which is to be clamped to the soil on both sides of the swale subject to the review of the City Engineer or their designee.

b. Project Boundaries. On-site drainage shall be conveyed in an improved open “V”-swale gutter, which has a naturalized appearance, or within an underground pipe in either a private drainage easement, that is to be maintained by its owners or a homeowners' association, or it shall be conveyed in a public easement. The easement width shall be a minimum of ten feet. A greater width may be determined necessary on an individual basis and shall be dependent on appropriate hydrologic studies and access requirements.

I. Public Safety.

272
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 36 of 49 ends

1. Residential developments shall be constructed in a manner so as to reduce the potential for spread of wildfires as follows:

a. In the case of a conflict where more restrictive provisions are contained in the adopted and/or locally adopted version(s) of the California Building Code or in the California Fire Code, the more restrictive provisions shall apply.

b. Roofs shall be covered with noncombustible materials (e.g., clay tile, concrete shake, tile, or similar materials). Open ends shall be stopped in order to prevent bird nests, or other combustible material, lodging within the roof and to prevent entry of flames.

c. Exterior walls and fences shall be surfaced with noncombustible or flame resistive materials.

Alternate surface materials may be approved subject to the approval of the fire code official and building official. Except as otherwise provided herein, exterior walls shall extend to the ground.

d. Balconies, patio roofs, eaves and other similar overhangs shall be of noncombustible or flame resistive materials.

e. Plastic webbing, split or whole bamboo, reed or straw-like materials, corrugated plastic or fiberglass materials, and similar flammable materials are not permitted for use on patio covers.

f. Vents for attics and underfloor areas shall be designed and located to minimize the likelihood of the spread of fire.

g. Chimneys shall be provided with approved spark arresters.

2. Adequate water supply and pressure for the proposed development shall be required in compliance with the fire department Standards.

3. The fire code official shall require brush, vegetation, or combustible debris to be removed and cleared within ten feet on each side of every roadway and access drive, and may enter upon private property to do so. This requirement shall not apply to single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery, or cultivated groundcover provided they do not form a means of readily transmitting fire.

4. If the fire code official determines in a specific case that difficult terrain, danger of erosion, or other unusual circumstances make strict compliance with the clearance of vegetation undesirable or impractical, he or she may suspend enforcement thereof and require reasonable alternative measures designed to advance the purposes of this chapter.

5. Site design shall provide for all-weather equipment access to publicly maintained slope areas for maintenance and emergency purposes. Secondary access shall be provided, or an alternative method may be considered by the fire code official with evidence to ensure public safety.

6. Structures and facilities shall be restricted in geologically hazardous areas.

7. Special construction features shall be required in the design of structures where site investigations confirm potential geologic hazards.

273
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 37 of 49 ends

8. Development not on public sewers shall be permitted only after site specific investigations have been conducted that demonstrate the soils are suitable for on-site wastewater disposal and the disposal of wastewater will not degrade the subsurface water quality.

9. Due to the hazard associated with saturated soils in areas of steep slopes, irrigation systems in critical areas that have the potential for failure in the judgement of the City Engineer, or their designee, shall be required to be equipped with potentiometers to make sure that the systems will not operate when there is sufficient moisture in the soil.

16.24.070 Hillside Development Guidelines.

The hillside development guidelines are intended to illustrate and amplify the appropriate development concepts for designated hillside areas. The guidelines are not intended to be an exhaustive list of standards, but rather policy statements, to encourage development that is sensitive to the unique characteristics common to hillside properties. The guidelines allow for flexibility and they encourage creativity, especially where a specific plan is prepared. However, the objective development standards provided in Section 16.24.060 shall be considered as a "benchmark" against which hillside development proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the purposes of this chapter.

The guideline's purpose is to allow for innovative or alternate methods of design in hillside areas.

Innovation is encouraged as long as the end result is one that respects the natural character of the hillside and is consistent with the purposes of this chapter and the goals, objectives and policies of the City’s General Plan.

Conformance with the guidelines shall be incorporated in the preparation and approval of subdivisions and individual site developments. During the application review process, the City will evaluate the consistency of the proposal with the purposes of this chapter. Prior to the start of the design effort, it is recommended that the project design team members read the City’s General Plan and become familiar with its policies.

A. Site Design.

1. Design of building sites shall be sensitive to the natural terrain. Structures shall be located in a way that minimizes grading and preserves natural features (e.g., prominent knolls, ridgelines, etc.)

2. Preserve views of significant visual features.

3. Where possible, graded areas should be designed with manufactured slopes located on the uphill side of structures.
274
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 38 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-10
EXHIBIT 2 - BUILDING PLACEMENT AT A SITE

4. To the extent possible, the width of a building, measured in the direction of the slope, shall be minimized. The degree of the slope will dictate how this is accomplished and shall be demonstrated on the project plans (See Figure 16.24-11 Exhibit 3 – Building Placement at a Site.”

275
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 39 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-11
EXHIBIT 3 - BUILDING PLACEMENT AT A SITE

5. Clustering of development is encouraged.

B. Driveways and Roadways.

1. Driveways that serve more than one parcel are encouraged as a method of reducing grading, paving, and site disturbance.

FIGURE 16.24-12

ROADWAY PLACEMENT AT A SITE

C. Architecture.

1. The form, mass, and profile of the individual buildings and architectural features shall be designed to blend with the natural terrain and preserve the character and profile of the natural slope.

Techniques to accomplish this include:

a. Detaching the garage from the residence; and

b. Integrating retaining walls into garage walls on sloping lots to reduce gradingand minimize visibility of walls; and

c. Including architectural enrichments and variations in roof massing. Roofs shall incorporate low profiles (for example 3:12 slope) to minimize their visual impact. On sloping land, the roof pitch shall 276
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 40 of 49 ends

follow the slope of the hillside, instead of being perpendicular to the hillside or opposing hillside slope.

Gable ends shall not be used on downhill elevations. Upper stories shall not be cantilevered out of the opposite direction of the hillside slope.

2. The design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of building scale and to minimize the blocking of views as demonstrated on the project plans. For example, within a development, the majority of the units should not be designed with minimum setback to minimum setback. See additional criteria as provided under Section 16.08.030 “Single-family Residential Design Standards and Design Features” and Section 16.08.040 “Multi-family Residential Design Standards”.

D. Walls and Fences.

1. When possible, walls and fences shall be designed as an integral part of the building in order to minimize the visual impact on surrounding areas.

E. Landscaping.

1. Street trees shall be provided in select areas to enhance the natural character of the areas and to create a more rural appearance. Street tree species selection, and spacing of trees, shall be sensitive to the context in which they are planted. Species selection shall be considered to minimize potential impacts to infrastructure improvements (i.e. root damage to streets, sidewalks, etc.).

2. Slopes shall be designed with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope planes, consistent with landform grading concepts.

277
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 41 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-13

BUILDING ENVELOPE ON SLOPE

F. Grading.

There are three distinct types of grading proposed in these guidelines, each with a unique quality, and each with an individual and appropriate application as determined by the City Engineer or designee.

Larger sites will most likely incorporate all three concepts in various parts of the plan.

1. Minimal Grading. This is typically used for large lot single family homes, custom homes with variable foundations that conform to the existing slopes, and other uses that utilize the least amount of grading in order to get the facility and structures built. This technique embraces the following concepts:

a. Grading shall be limited to individual flat graded pad areas for residential building sites.

Grading shall be limited to only the required building areas and adjacent outdoor amenities in steep hillside areas;

b. Foundation systems that require little or no grading are encouraged, forcing the architecture to conform to the land rather than the land to conform to the dwelling;

c. Cut and fill lines delineating the grading activity whereby cut areas adjoining next to fill areas shall be situated outside of areas where differential settlement is not desirable (e.g., roadways, building pads, driveways, etc.);

d. The balancing of grading is the concept to minimize the volume of cubic yards of earth excavated and filled.

2. Contour Grading. This concept results in post-development landforms that exhibit many of the characteristics present within natural landforms. Contour grading is typically used in situations where conventional, terraced, grading with benches and slopes might be used but a "softened" grading look is desired. This would be desirable for areas that are limited in public view (i.e. concealed rear yards). 278
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 42 of 49 ends

Typically, contour grading can reduce required cut and fill volumes as compared with traditional, terraced, grading. The design elements associated with this type of grading include: (See Figure 16.24-14 “Contour Grading”)

a. The use of horizontal and vertical curve variations for slope banks creating a curvilinear pattern;

b. Post-development landforms that exhibit natural terrain characteristics (without the heavy modeling effects of landform grading);

c. A general rounding of slopes at slope intersections and transition zones with natural grade;

d. Pad configurations that are curvilinear; and

e. Slopes that are designed with contour grading techniques (e.g., the location of slopes behind structure (not in side yards), slopes in hidden locations, or slopes less than ten feet in height).

FIGURE 16.24-14

CONTOUR GRADING

279
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 43 of 49 ends

FIGURE 16.24-15

LANDFORM GRADING

3. Landform Grading. Graded slopes in this category will replicate the irregular shapes of natural slopes. Landform grading techniques shall be used whenever slopes are created that will be open to public view.

The intent of these grading guidelines is to incorporate the basic principles of the landform grading concept as the preferred method in the design and construction of hillside development projects. (See Figure 16.24-15 “Landform Grading”)

Landform grading techniques shall incorporate the following concepts:

a. Land plans shall flow with the natural topography rather than against it. This means that street patterns and building pad configurations shall follow the underlying topographic features rather than cutting across them;

b. Landform graded slopes are characterized by continuous series of concave and convex forms interspersed with mounds that blend into profiles with varying slope gradients and with significant transition zones between man-made and natural slopes;

c. Slope drainage devices either follow natural lines of the slopes or are tucked away in special Swale and berm combinations in order to conceal the drains from view. Exposed segments in visible areas are treated with natural rock for a more aesthetically pleasing appearance;

d. This technique shall be used wherever possible to provide for a variety of slope percentage, slope direction, and topographical detailing in a three-dimensional, undulating pattern similar to existing terrain; and

280
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 44 of 49 ends

e. Manufactured cut and fill slopes in excess of ten feet in height that will be either exposed to permanent public view or are adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas, shall be designed with features characteristic of natural slopes. This design shall be implemented, as determined by the City Engineer based on the project plans so that the ultimate appearance will resemble a natural slope. This is applicable to, but not limited to, slopes along streets, highways, adjacent to parks, schools, open spaces, other public facilities, and other prominent and visible slopes.

4. The following grading guidelines and techniques serve to implement preferred landform grading techniques and help avoid unnecessary cut and fill:

a. Cuts. When grading into convex landforms (i.e., outward-projecting features), the resulting cuts shall maintain a similarly projecting form and be contoured to blend seamlessly with the undisturbed portions, thereby preserving a natural-appearing landform.

b. Use of variable slope ratios. Because landform grading designs require the use of variable slope ratios, this may result in loss of usable area near building pads. Therefore, only cut slopes may be steeper than 2:1, but not steeper than 1.5:1 and shall meet the following guidelines:

1) A geotechnical engineer shall certify that slopes will meet standard stability requirements; 2) A licensed landscape architect shall certify the plantability of the slopes, with an emphasis on the slopes steeper than 2:1; and

3) The overall ratio from top to toe will be 2:1 or flatter; and 4) Ratios flatter than 2:1 will also be used in the slope design.

c. Grading operations shall occur to avoid the rainy season, October fifteenth (15th) to April fifteenth (15th). Grading permits shall only be issued when a plan for erosion and sediment control has been approved by the City without regard to time of year. Additionally, those projects also requiring a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall obtain approval of the SWPPP prior to any grading permit issuance.

d. Rounded and smooth transitions shall occur where man-made and natural slopes intersect.

Where cut or fill conditions are created, slopes shall be varied. The angle of a graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain.

e. Manufactured slopes adjacent to roadways shall be consistent with the landform grading and revegetation techniques.

f. Slopes shall implement drainage measures as detailed within Sub-article 11 of the City of Murrieta Grading Manual.

G. Drainage.

1. Natural drainage courses shall be preserved and enhanced to the maximum extent per the associated National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit associated with the project site.

281
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 45 of 49 ends

2. The NPDES Permit also requires that a project’s stormwater runoff be retained on-site through filtration to the maximum extent permitted by State law. Runoff not retained on-site shall be conveyed off-site in accordance with City standards, codes, and policies.

16.24.080 Exceptions.

A. Residential Accessory Structures and Accessory Dwelling Units. This Chapter shall not apply to the development of residential accessory structures and accessory dwelling units on parcels with existing development approvals when the new construction:

1. Does not require the use of a retaining wall; and

2. Meets the criteria as described within Section 16.44.150 (Residential Accessory Uses and Structures) and Section 16.44.160 (Accessory Dwelling Units) and Section 16.02.020 (Exemptions from Land Use Permit Requirements).

16.24.090 (Reserved).

Reserved for future updates

16.24.100 Hillside Overlay Map.

282
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 46 of 49 ends

A. Refer to the City’s online Geographic Information System (GIS) as an additional mapping resource for project review.”

SECTION 11. Section 16.28.080 (Landscaping Standards) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“16.28.080 Landscape Standards.

Landscape areas and materials shall be designed, installed, and maintained in compliance with the following:

A. General Design Standards. The following features shall be incorporated into the design of the proposed landscape and shown on required landscape plans:

1. Landscaping shall be planned as an integral part of the overall project design and not simply located in excess space after parking areas and structures have been planned;

2. Pedestrian access to sidewalks and structures shall be considered in the design of all landscaped areas;

3. Landscape planting shall be provided for all adjacent public rights-of-way, in compliance with Chapter 16.108 (Improvements);

4. With the exception of single-family residential units, landscape adjacent to driveways and parking areas shall be protected from vehicle damage through the provision of minimum six (6) inch high concrete curbs or other types of barriers as approved by the director;

5. Landscaped areas shall not be less than five (5) feet in width, except where determined by the director;

6. Concrete strips, a minimum of four (4) inches in width, shall be provided to separate all turf areas from other landscaped areas, except for single-family residential landscape projects;

7. Permeable surfaces shall be used wherever permissible in place of impervious paving, to encourage on-site water infiltration and support water conservation measures. Permeable surfaces shall be identified on plans; and

8. Protective tree grates shall be provided for trees planted in pedestrian areas, except for single-family residential landscape projects and as determined by the director.

B. Plant Materials. Plant materials shall be selected and installed to comply with the following requirements:

1. A mix of plant materials shall be provided in compliance with the following table (Table 16.28-2).

Calculations documenting the required mix shall be shown on the landscape plan;

TABLE 16.28-2

MINIMUM REQUIRED MIX OF PLANT MATERIALS
Plant Material Minimum Required Percentage
283
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 47 of 49 ends

Trees
Twenty-four (24) inch box 35%*
Fifteen (15) gallon 65%
Shrubs
Five (5) gallon 70%
One (1) gallon (herbaceous only) with city
approval
30%
Groundcover
Coverage within two (2) years 100%
A greater percentage of specimen trees may be utilized with a corresponding reduction in the number of fifteen- (15-) gallon trees subject to the review of the director.

2. Trees for shade shall be provided for buildings/structures, as well as for parking lots and open space areas. These trees can be deciduous or evergreen and are to be incorporated to provide natural cooling opportunities for the purpose of energy and water conservation;

3. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures, at an equivalent of at least one (1) tree per thirty (30) linear feet of structure. Other areas shall provide trees at a ratio of one (1) tree for each three hundred (300) square feet of landscaped area. The clustering of trees is encouraged;

4. Mature specimen trees in thirty-six (36) inch and forty-eight (48) inch boxes shall be provided for large projects in sufficient quantity subject to the approval of the Director, to provide variety and emphasis at main focal areas;

5. All trees shall be staked or guyed (on a case-by-case basis) subject to the review of the director and in compliance with city standards;

6. Trees and shrubs shall be planted so that at maturity they do not interfere with service lines and traffic safety sight areas;

7. Trees and shrubs shall be planted and maintained in a manner that protects the basic rights of adjacent property owners, particularly the right to solar access;

8. Trees planted near public sidewalks or curbs shall be of a species and installed in a manner that prevents physical damage to sidewalks, curbs, gutters and other public improvements; and

9. Groundcover shall be of live plant material. Limited quantities of gravel, colored rock, bark, and similar materials may be used in combination with a living groundcover.”

SECTION 12. This ordinance was previously reviewed for consistency with the Citywide Comprehensive Development Code in 1998. The standards were originally evaluated and implemented pursuant to the Negative Declaration adopted for implementation of the Comprehensive Development Code on October 28, 1997. Furthermore, the proposed updates have been evaluated for consistency with the current project proposal in consideration of the previously adopted Negative Declaration and the Murrieta General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Subsequent Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) certified by the City 284
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 48 of 49 ends

of Murrieta in 2021 (SCH No. 2010111084) in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 1516 2. Based on this evaluation, staff determined that the proposed updates would not result in new significant environmental impacts, a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts , or changed circumstances that would require preparat ion of a subsequent or supplemental environmental document. Accordingly, the previously adopted environmental documents adequately address the proposed modifications.

SECTION 13. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance i s for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 14. This Ordinance shall become effective on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage and adoption, and within fifteen (15) days after its final passage and the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted and published in a newspaper of general ci rculation, printed, published and circulated in the City in the manner required by law and shall cause a copy of this Ordinance and its certification, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ________, 202__.

Jon Levell, Mayor

ATTEST:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Tiffany J. Israel, City Attorney

285
Ordinance No. 638-26

Page 49 of 49 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§

CITY OF MURRIETA )

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 638-26 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Murrieta at the regular meeting thereof, held on the ___th day of _______, 202__, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following
vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California further certify that Ordinance No. 638-26 was duly published according to law and the order of the City Council of said City and the same was so published in Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation on the following date(s):

Adopted Ordinance: , 2026.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name this __ day of ______________, 2026.

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

286

REDLINE

ORDINANCE NO. 26-__

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA,

CALIFORNIA, TO AMEND THE MURRIETA MUNICIPAL CODE (TITLES 8 AND 15), CHAPTERS 8.20, 15.52, AND TO AMEND MURRIETA
DEVELOPMENT CODE (TITLE 16) FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVISING AND UPDATING CHAPTERS 16.08, 16.14, 16.18, 16.22, 16.24, 16.28, AND TO ADD NEW SECTIONS 16.24.080, ENTITLED “EXCEPTIONS”, 16.24.090, ENTITLED “RESERVED”, AND 16.24.100, ENTITLED “HILLSIDE

OVERLAY MAP

Summary: This Ordinance updates the City’s existing hillside regulations to promote and guide the orderly development of hillside areas through standards, which are specifically designed to address the unique challenges of such terrain. These updated regulations include, but are not limited to, provisions related to the measurement of building height on a slope with new graphics, clarification of applicability of a hillside area, the basis for a slope determination, when a hillside development permit is required, undeveloped and developed review criteria and applicability, updated definitions, hillside application materials, review procedures, slope grading techniques, the placement and height of retaining walls in hillside areas, site access, aesthetic and landscape treatments, exceptions to a permit, and incorporation of new hillside overlay into the municipal code.

WHEREAS, the City of Murrieta (“City”) proposes an amendment to the City's Development Code for the purpose of revising and updating Chapters 8.20 and 15.52 (“Municipal Code Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, updates are provided to modify Chapters 8.20 and 15.52 of the Murrieta Municipal Code for the purposes of clarifying property maintenance and vegetation requirements, including revegetation of sloped areas following catastrophic events such as wildfires or landslides to reduce erosion, and update the grading regulations to reference the City's definition of a “Hillside Area” contained in the Murrieta Development Code.

WHEREAS, the City of Murrieta (“City”) proposes an amendment to the City's Development Code for the purpose of revising and updating Chapters 16.08, 16.14, 16.18, 16.22,

16.24, and 16.28 (“Development Code Amendment”); and

WHEREAS, with an effective date of December 18th, 1997, the City Council, after extensive public input, adopted Ordinance No. 182-97, which is generally known as the City of Murrieta Development Code, which contained provisions for hillside development regulations; and

WHEREAS, the purpose of this Ordinance is to promote and encourage the orderly development of hillside areas of the City by the application of regulations and requirements established to meet the particular problems associated with the development of hillside areas, 287
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 2 of 65 ends

including, but not limited to clarification of where hillside areas apply and related review processes, slope grading techniques, placement and height of structures, retaining walls, access, and atheistic treatments; and

WHEREAS, it was discovered by public input and verified by staff that these provisions are being applied Citywide, whereas the original intention was for these provisions to be applied to properties within the designated Hillside Overlay; and

WHEREAS, DCA-2021-2396 includes updates in order to provide consistency and eliminate errors within the sections of the City's Development Code as identified for hillside areas and related development criteria; and

WHEREAS, on March 29, 2022, the City Council directed staff to review the hillside development standards and explained to staff that they were never meant to apply on a citywide basis; and

WHEREAS, on December 14th, 2022, the City held a first public workshop. This item was continued from that meeting and re-noticed for the January 25, 2023, meeting. No report or presentation was provided; and

WHEREAS, on January 25th, 2023, the City held a second public workshop at its Planning Commission meeting to provide and receive input from local residents and the Commission concerning hillside development standards in the City. Areas that were covered were inclusive of existing and proposed Hillside Overlay applicability, height allowances for structures, height measurement criteria, hillside slope applicability, average slope calculation, Prominent Ridgeline Overlay, and retaining wall criteria. The other items presented by staff were potential techniques to improve the readability of the existing Murrieta Municipal Code (MMC), examples of graphic exhibits that could be incorporated, highlights of areas to resolve code inconsistencies, ways to incorporate best practices, and suggestions from staff on how to simplify the standards to make them more user-friendly to both staff and applicants; and

WHEREAS, on April 11th, 2023, staff hosted a presentation on the existing and proposed hillside standards. Staff held the workshop to obtain additional feedback from the community on the proposed hillside development standards. This additional outreach was conducted per direction from the prior Planning Commission for further community input and to provide transparency. Areas that were covered were inclusive of existing and proposed Hillside Overlay applicability, height allowances for structures, height measurement criteria, hillside slope applicability, average slope calculation, Prominent Ridgeline Overlay, and retaining wall criteria. There was time provided for questions/answers at the end of the presentation for feedback on the proposed updates from the public; and

WHEREAS, on June 28th, 2023, the City of Murrieta Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Development Code Amendment, at which the staff report was presented as well as written comments from the public regarding the need for the proposed code amendment and providing evidence in the record to support the findings required by the Murrieta Development Code Section 16.58.080; and
288
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 3 of 65 ends

WHEREAS, on August 15, 2023, the City Council hosted its first workshop on this item.

The City Council requested additional information. Council members and staff discussed key standards for retaining wall heights, specifically discussing a 6-foot baseline and the balance between aesthetic landscaping and mandatory fire safety fuel modification zones. The session aimed to replace subjective guidelines with objective criteria for building on slopes, ensuring that new developments preserve the city’s visual ridgelines while providing a clearer, more predictable path for project approvals. The workshop was continued to a future meeting date; and

WHEREAS, on March 5, 2024, the City Council hosted a second workshop on this item.

The discussion centered on a potential review process for retaining walls, clarifying building height measurements on sloped terrain, and ensuring the "Hillside Overlay" maps accurately reflect local topography to avoid unnecessary burdens on flat-land homeowners. Crucially, the Council worked to harmonize aesthetic screening requirements with mandatory state fire safety and fuel modification mandates, prioritizing the protection of prominent ridgelines while ensuring the code aligns with current California law. Due to additional time needed for the discussion and feedback, the workshop was continued for a second time; and

WHEREAS, on June 17, 2025, the City Council hosted a third workshop on this item. The direction/feedback from the Council was that detailed examples of standards from other localities and more of them were needed in order to assist the Council with moving forward; and

WHEREAS, on October 21, 2025, the City Council held its fourth workshop on this item. The discussion centered on the following areas, where the Council reached consensus on key Focus Topics with the Applicability of Standards; Identifying The City’s Hillside Areas: 20 Percent Slope Versus 25 Percent; 25 Percent Slope Criteria; Specific Plans; and the use of Geographic Info. Systems (GIS) And Average Slope Formula; and

WHEREAS, on November 18, 2025, the City Council conducted its fifth workshop on this item, during which several key policy directions and considerations were identified, including, but not limited to, the following: that updates to retaining wall regulations should be addressed on a citywide basis rather than limited to Hillside Areas; that standards should provide both flexibility through defined options and sufficient specificity, particularly with respect to retaining wall design; that retaining wall design standards should be implemented citywide; that color palettes for retaining walls should generally consist of muted tones, with specific shades or blends established in advance to ensure a consistent and desirable aesthetic; that earthtone colors may be appropriate for hillside structures; that retaining walls exceeding six feet in height may, in certain circumstances, be excessive on a citywide basis; that tiered retaining walls incorporating landscaping are a preferred design feature; that Keystone-style walls with integrated landscaping are also desirable; that landscaping is a priority consideration for the Council, including the establishment of larger plant sizes earlier in the development process; that additional clarification from the Fire Department is necessary regarding planting requirements within Fuel Modification Plans; and that distinctions between rural residential and tract home front-yard setbacks should be more clearly defined; and,

289
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 4 of 65 ends

WHEREAS, on February 3, 2026, the City Council held its sixth and final workshop on the topic. The Murrieta City Council discussed key topics, including retaining walls, landscaping standards, fire severity zones, distinctions between developed and undeveloped properties, and the relationship between hillside and citywide standards. Public input raised concerns about the visual and regulatory impacts of retaining walls, tree removal credits, definitions of undisturbed land, conditions of approval, and broader issues such as Senate Bill 9 and insurance implications.

Following that discussion, the Council reached consensus to provide direction on specific retaining wall types (including geogrid, CMU, and keystone walls) for hillside areas, suggested requiring earlier installation of larger landscaping, and that a separate ordinance was needed on a city-wide basis as it relates to retaining walls, along with direction to staff that the definitions of developed and undeveloped land for hillside areas need to be clearly defined.

WHEREAS, on May 13, 2026, following public testimony and deliberation regarding various components of the proposed hillside regulations, the Planning Commission continued consideration of the item to allow staff additional time to refine the definitions of developed (disturbed) and undeveloped (undisturbed) hillside areas, which have since been incorporated into the draft Ordinance; and staff further incorporated stakeholder-recommended revisions, including replacing the term "encourage" with "reasonably consider" in Section 16.24.010 (Purpose) and clarifying the methodology for rounding slope percentages when determining whether a property constitutes a hillside condition under the Ordinance; and,

WHEREAS, on July 8, 2026, the Planning Commission continued its consideration of the proposed hillside regulations, with particular discussion focused on the distinction between developed/disturbed and undeveloped/undisturbed hillside areas. This issue had been a key topic of discussion at the May 13, 2026, hearing and was among the primary reasons the item was continued to allow staff additional time to evaluate and refine the proposed standards. Following the staff presentation, Commission deliberation, and public testimony, the Planning Commission concluded its review of the proposed Hillside Development Code amendments. The Commission voted to recommend that the City Council authorize the associated environmental determination and approval of the Development Code Amendment; thereby, advancing the proposed amendments to the City Council for final consideration.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct and incorporated herein.

SECTION 2. Section 8.20.030.P.5.b. (Declaration of Nuisance) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

8.20.030 Declaration of Nuisance.
...

P. To maintain any property or structure in such a manner as to cause or allow the property or structure to become defective, unsightly or in such other condition of deterioration or disrepair as the same may cause substantial depreciation of the property values of, or similar 290
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 5 of 65 ends

detriment to surrounding properties, as well as an adverse effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the city. This includes but is not limited to any of the following:
...

5. Property which is not in compliance with the following minimum standard requirements:
...

b. In all zones, trees, shrubs, lawns, landscaping, and other plantings shall be maintained, including regular irrigation, pruning of trees, trimming of shrubs and cutting of lawns, in conformity with the surrounding vicinity. Property shall also comply with the weed abatement standards in Chapter 8.32 of this code; and, in any case, abate dead, decayed, diseased, overgrown or hazardous trees, weeds and vegetation, cultivated or uncultivated, which is likely to harbor rats or vermin, or constitute an unsightly appearance, or is detrimental to neighboring properties or property values shall be abated. Following a catastrophic event causing a loss of vegetation (i.e. wildfire, landslide, etc.), all impacted sloped areas of a subject parcel shall be revegetated to prevent further erosion pursuant to Section 16.28.080 (Landscaping Standards).

SECTION 3. Section 15.52.020 (Definitions) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

15.52.020 Definitions.
…

“Hillside Area,” Refer to the definition for this term under Section 16.24.030.

“Hillside site,” means a site where the existing grade is twenty percent (20%) or greater and which may be adversely affected by drainage and/or stability conditions within or from outside the site, or which may cause an adverse affect on adjacent property.

…

SECTION 4. Section 16.08.020 (Residential Districts General Development Standards), Table 16.08-03 (Residential (Single-Family) Zones General Development Standards) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“
TABLE 16.08-3

RESIDENTIAL (SINGLE-FAMILY) ZONES

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development
Feature
RR ER-1 ER-2 ER-3 SF-1 SF-2(3)
Minimum
Parcel Size

2.5 acres(2)

1.0 acres

0.5 acres(1)
10,000
sq. ft.
7,200 sq.
ft.
4,350 sq. ft.
291
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 6 of 65 ends

Density Range 0.1 - 0.4
dus/acre

0.4 - 1.0
dus/acre

1.0 - 2.0
dus/acre

2.0 - 3.0
dus/acre

2.1 - 5.0
dus/acre

5.1 - 10.0
dus/acre
Minimum
Parcel Width
100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 70 feet 70 feet 55 feet, 45 feet for parcels less than 5,000
square feet. This parcel
width shall be increased
to a 50 foot width for
every fifth lot on a non-
cul-d e-
sac parcel street
frontage.

Minimum
Livable Area
1,000
sq. ft.
1,000
sq. ft.
1,000
sq. ft.
1,000
sq. ft.
1,000 sq.
ft.
1,000 sq. ft.

Setbacks
Front 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
Interior 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 10 feet 10 feet 7.5 feet per side.

For parcels less than
5,000 sq. ft. =
A minimum of an
average of 12 feet
overall for the
combination on of both
interior sides with no
side setback of less than
5 feet.

Street Side 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 10 feet Rear 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
Accessory
Structures
Consistent with Section 16.44.150
Maximum
Parcel
Coverage
25% 25% 35% 35% 35% for
two- story;
45% for
single story
50%
Maximum
Building Height
40 feet(4) 40 feet(4) 40 feet(4) 35 feet(4) 35 feet(4) 35 feet(4) Minimum On-
site
Landscaping
25% of front yard area
Small Attached
Unit
Configuration
Refer to Section 16.16.020 “Planned Residential Development General Standards” for development standards and project review and 16.16.030 “Planned Residential Development Design Standards and Parameters.”
Notes:
(1) A forty (40) foot wide buffer shall be provided along Washington Avenue (from Guava to Elm Street) in the public right-of-way. Landscaping to include six-foot high block wall, pedestrian trails and/or sidewalk, and landscaping berms to act as natural buffers. New residential projects will be 292
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 7 of 65 ends

allowed to access from Washington Avenue with residential lots abutting Washington Avenue are prohibited from taking direct access from Washington Avenue. (2) The minimum parcel area for properties zoned RR can include adjacent area to the centerline of the public street right-of-way.
(3) For projects proposing a clustering configuration with detached single-family homes or within small attached unit configurations, please see 16.16.020 “Planned Residential Development General Standards” and 16.16.030 “Planned Residential Development Design Standards and Parameters” for requirements.
(4) For structures located within a Hillside Area, see the maximum height criteria as provided within Section 16.24 (Hillside Development) and applicability. “
SECTION 5. Section 16.08.020 (Residential Districts General Development Standards), Table

16.08-04 (Residential (Multi-Family) Zones General Development Standards) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“
TABLE 16.08-4

RESIDENTIAL (MULTI-FAMILY) ZONES

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Development Feature MF-1(5) MF-2 MF-3 MF-4
Minimum Parcel Size 5 acres 5 acres 5 acres 5 acres Minimum Parcel Width 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Density Range 10.1 - 15
du/acre

15.1 - 18.0
du/acre

18.1-29.0 du-
acre
Min. 30
du/acre
Minimum Livable Area 500 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft.

Setbacks
Street 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet
Interior 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet
Maximum Parcel Coverage 35% 35% 50% None
Maximum Height Limit 50 feet 50 feet 60 feet 100 feet Open Space (per dwelling unit)
Private Open Space 60 sq. ft./upper
floor
100 sq.
ft./ground floor
60 sq. ft./upper
floor
100 sq.
ft./ground floor
All units 50 sq.
ft.(2)
All units 50 sq.
ft.(2)
Common Open Space 200 sq. ft. 200 sq. ft. 150 sq. ft.(3) 150 sq. ft.(3) Recreational Amenities For projects
containing 25
or more
dwelling units,
provide one
recreational
amenity for
each 30
dwelling units
or fraction
thereof(4)
For projects
containing 25
or more
dwelling units,
provide one
recreational
amenity for
each 30
dwelling units
or fraction
thereof(4)
293
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 8 of 65 ends

Minimum On-site Landscaping 10% of the site area
Notes:

(1) When adjacent to existing single-family residential use or zone, the building setback from the nearest property line shall be 10 feet for the first 25 feet in height, above 25 feet in height the setback shall be 20 feet, and above 50 feet, the setback shall be 30 feet. (2) For stand-alone multi-family residential projects or as part of a mixed-use development, each residential unit shall be provided with at least one area of private open space accessible directly from the living area of the unit, in the form of fenced yard or patio, a deck or balcony at a minimum area of 50 square feet. The minimum dimension, width or depth of a balcony shall be 5 feet. (3) All common open space shall be conveniently located and accessible to all dwelling units on the site. Common open space may include landscaping, pedestrian paths and recreational amenities. In projects containing fewer than 10 units, the common open space shall have a minimum width and depth of 10 feet. In projects containing 10 or more or units, the minimum width and depth shall be 20 feet. (4) One common recreational amenity shall be provided for each 30 units or fraction thereof. The following listed amenities satisfy the above recreational facilities requirements. Recognizing that certain facilities serve more people than others, have a wider interest or appeal, and/or occupy more area, specified items may be counted as two amenities, as noted. In all cases, each square foot of land area devoted to a recreational amenity shall be credited as common open space on a 1:1 basis. a. Clubhouse (two)
b. Swimming Pool (two)
c. Tennis, Basketball or Racquetball court
d. Weightlifting facility
e. Children's playground equipment
f. Sauna or Jacuzzi
g. Day Care Facility (two)
h. Other recreational amenities deemed adequate by the director.

(5) For projects proposing a clustering configuration with detached single-family homes or within small attached unit configurations, please see 16.16.020 “Planned Residential Development General Standards” and 16.16.030 “Planned Residential Development Design Standards and Parameters” for requirements.
(6) For structures located within a Hillside Area, see the maximum height criteria as provided within Section 16.24 (Hillside Development) and applicability. “

SECTION 6. Section 16.14.010 (Purpose), Table 16.14-2 (Special Purpose Districts General Development Standards) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“
TABLE 16.14-2

SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
294
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 9 of 65 ends

Development Feature P&R C&I OS
Setbacks
Street 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet
Interior 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet
From Abutting Residential District 15 feet
Accessory Structures Same as Primary Structure
Maximum Height Limit(1) 35 feet(1) 50 feet(1) 35 feet(1) (1) For structures located within a Hillside Area, see the maximum height criteria as provided within Section 16.24 (Hillside Development) and applicability. “

SECTION 7. Section 16.18.080 (Height Measurement and Height Limit Exceptions) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“All structures shall meet the following standards relating to height, except for fences and walls, which shall comply with Chapter 16.22 (Fences, Hedges, and Walls).

A. Maximum Height. The height of structures shall not exceed the standard established by the applicable zoning district in Article II (Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses). or for structures within a Hillside Area under Section 16.24.020.A. In addition, the Mmaximum height for structures on a specific parcel shall be measured as follows: the vertical distance from finish grade to an imaginary plane located the allowed number of feet above and parallel to the finish grade.

FIGURE 3-1

HEIGHT MEASUREMENT

1. Establishing the high point and low point on the property as reference grade points as follows:
a. A measurement is taken from the lower of existing or proposed grade, 5 feet away from the lowest grade point around the structure in accordance with Figure 16.18 -1. This point shall be the low reference grade point. The highest point anywhere on the structure may not exceed the elevation of that low grade point by more than the allowable height plus the grade differential between the low point of structure and high point of structure (excluding items as detailed under Section 16.18.080(B) (Exc eptions to Height Limits)), but in such case where the actual grade differential exceeds 10 feet, only a maximum of 10 feet may be added to the maximum allowable height per the zone. The measurement is the difference in elevation between the highest and the lowest adjacent ground elevation surrounding the building. 295
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 10 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.18-1

MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS

b. If the difference in elevation is 10 feet or less, the reference grade point is established at the highest adjacent ground elevation. See Figure 16.18-2. If the difference in elevation is greater than 10 feet, the reference grade point is established at 10 feet above the lowest adjacent ground elevation. See Figure 16.18-3. For stepped or terraced buildings, the building height is the overall height as illustrated in Figures 16.18-4 and Figure 16.18-5.

FIGURE(S) 16.18-2, -3, -4. -5
296
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 11 of 65 ends

MEASUREMENT CRITERIA

c. For a project with a proposed pad configuration, the height of the structure measured by the vertical distance from the finished grade to the height of the roof line. See Figure 16.18-6.

FIGURE 16.18-6

MEASUREMENT WITH PAD CONFIGURATION

B. Structures on Sloping Parcels. Where the average slope of a parcel is greater than one foot rise or fall in 7 feet of distance from the street elevation at the property line, structure height shall be measured in compliance with Chapter 16.24 (Hillside Development).

CB. Exceptions to Height Limits. Exceptions to the height limits identified in this development code shall apply in the following manner:

1. Roof-mounted Features. Roof-mounted features including chimneys, cupolas, clock towers, elevator equipment rooms, equipment enclosures, and similar architectural features shall be allowed, up to a maximum of fifteen (15) feet above the allowed structure height. The total square footage of all structures above the heights allowed in the zoning districts shall not occupy more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total roof area of the structure. Greater height or area coverage may be allowed subject to the approval of a minor conditional use permit in compliance with Chapter 16.52.

2. Parapet Walls. Fire or parapet walls may extend up to four feet above the allowable height limit of the structure.

3. Public Assembly, Hotels, Class "A" Office and Public Structures. Places of public assembly including churches, schools, assembly halls, Class "A" office buildings greater than three (3) stories, hotels and other similar structures may exceed the established height limit by one (1) foot for every two (2) feet that the minimum required front, rear and side yard setbacks are increased. The increase in the front, rear and side yard setbacks is determined by averaging the total of the increased building setbacks at the closest point on all sides. The maximum additional height allowed is thirty (30) feet above the height limit established for the applicable zoning district. This exception shall not apply when the site is adjacent to single-family zoned property. This exception may be used in conjunction with the height exception for rooftop equipment.

4. Telecommunications Facilities. Telecommunication facilities, including antennae, poles, towers, and necessary mechanical appurtenances, may be authorized to exceed the height limit established for the 297
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 12 of 65 ends

applicable zoning district, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in compliance with Chapter

16.52. 5. Basement. A basement is defined as a story that has its floor surface below the adjoining finished grade as both conditioned and unconditioned space per the California Building and Residential Codes.” SECTION 8. Section 16.22.050 (Measurement of Fence or Wall Height) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“16.22.050 Measurement of Fence or Wall Height.

Where there is a difference in the ground level between two adjacent parcels of less than two feet, the height of a fence or wall constructed along the property line shall be determined by using the finish grade of the highest contiguous parcel. When there is a difference in the ground level between two adjacent parcels of two feet or more, the height of a fence or wall shall be determined by the director.”

SECTION 9. Section 16.22.060 (Walls Required Between Different Zoning Districts) of the Murrieta Municipal Code is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“16.22.060 Walls Required Between Different Zoning Districts.

Walls shall be provided and maintained between different zoning districts as follows:

A. Where a nonresidential or multi-family zoning district abuts a residential zoning district, a solid masonry wall C of six feet in height shall be constructed on the zone boundary line. Walls may be constructed higher than six feet if the viewshed is not impeded and is subject to the approval of the Ddirector;

B. Where a BP or IG zoning district abuts another zoning district, a solid masonry wall six feet in height shall be constructed on the zone boundary line;

C. Walls shall be of solid masonry construction and shall be of a decorative design when in view of public rights-of-way subject to approval of the director; and

D. The director may waive or modify requirements for walls between different zoning districts where a solid masonry wall already exists on the contiguous property if the following findings can be made:

1. The existing wall meets or can be modified to conform to the intent of this chapter;

2. Suitable landscaping can be installed adjacent to the existing wall to supplement and enhance the de-sireddesired physical separation;

3. The existing wall can be protected to prevent vehicle damage, if necessary, and

4. Concurrence of the adjacent property owner can be obtained, to modify the existing wall to meet the requirements of this chapter.”

SECTION 10. Chapter 16.24 (Hillside Development) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“16.24.010 Purpose.
298
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 13 of 65 ends

The purpose of this chapter is to provide regulations for the development of areas in the cityCity that, because of their topography, require special consideration to ensure that they are developed in a way that substantially maintains their natural character and environmental and aesthetic values to implement the City’s Ggeneral Pplan, and to provide for the safety, health, and welfare of the public by:

A. Providing guidelines and standards for development in visually sensitive hillside areasHillside Areas to minimize the ad-verseadverse impacts of gradinggrading and to promote the goals and objectives of the City’s Ggeneral Pplan;

B. Maintaining an environmental equilibrium consistent with existing vegetation, wildlife, soils, geology, slopesslopes, and drainage patterns, and to preserve natural topography and scenic character, including canyons, creeks, knolls, rock outcrops, and ridgelines whenever feasible;

C. EncouragingReasonably consider development proposals that feature water conservation and aquifer recharge techniques;

D. EncouragingReasonably consider development proposals that are sensitive to fire, flood, slide, erosionerosion, pollution, or other safety hazards;

E. EncouragingReasonably consider sensitive development through flexible design and innovative arrangement of building sites by utilizing variable lot sizes, clustering, and setback variations;

F. Utilizing nontraditional design standards for streets and hillside gradinggrading where development quality and public safety are not affected;

G. EncouragingReasonably consider developments that incorporate desirable existing features of land (e.g., natural vegetation, viewsheds, topographic features);

H. Protecting significant natural areas for ecologic purposes, educational, and other scientific study purposes; 1. Encouraging the use of drought-tolerant plant material to protect slopesslopes from soil erosionerosion and slippage, preserve natural watershed, minimize fire hazard, and minimize the scarring and deformation of the natural landscape;

IJ. Limiting the impact of cutcut slopesslopes on adjacent developed and undeveloped properties; and

JK. Providing for appropriate intensity of development (e.g., density, massing, etc.) in hillside areas through a variety of design techniques to ensure that development intensity decreases as slopesslopes become steeper (e.g., lot sizes appropriate for steeper topography and separation of structures sufficient to preserve thea viewshed).

16.24.020 Applicability.

A. Hillside Area. The standards contained in this chapter apply to uses and structures within areas that have a slope of twenty (20) percent or greater and/or are designated on the significant features map on file with the department.

A. Location Consideration for Analysis. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Code, the standards contained in this chapter apply to uses and structures within Hillside Areas that have a slope twenty-five (25) percent or greater and as designated within the boundaries of a Hillside Overlay Map.

Additionally, please refer to Table 16.24-1 (Undeveloped And Developed Standards And Processing 299
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 14 of 65 ends

Requirements), Section 16.02.020 (Exemptions from Land Use Permit Requirements), and Section

16.24.080 (Exceptions) for activities and features exempt from review.

B. Basis for Slope Determinations. For the purpose of this chapter, slope shall be computed on the natural slope of the land before grading is commenced, as determined from a topographic map having a scale of not less than one inch equals one hundred (100) feet and a contour tour interval of not more than five feet. Slope determinations shall be based upon citywide contour data as provided on the City’s website under the Geographic Information System webpage under Interactive Mapping.

C. Development Plan Permit Required. Hillside developments shall be subject to the approval of a development plan permit in compliance with Chapter 16.56, unless exempt per adopted City policy or State Law (Example: Accessory Dwelling Unit).

D. The development standards, guidelines and provisions of this chapter shall be applied to those portions of land with a predominance of significant natural slopes exceeding twenty-five (25) percent and areas that are integrally contiguous or slopes determined as significant by the director. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to projects relating to subdivisions, permits, uses, structures, specific plans, master development plans, and associated site plans for development review except as specifically exempted by Section 16.02.020.

D. Applicability Criteria. The development standards, guidelines, and provisions of this chapter shall be applied to those portions of land with a predominance of natural slopes exceeding twenty-five (25) percent or greater and areas that are integrally contiguous. The provisions of this chapter shall apply to projects relating to subdivisions, permits, uses, structures, specific plans, master development plans, and associated site plans for development review as described under Table 16.24-1 (Undeveloped and Developed Standards and Processing Requirements), except as specifically exempted by Section

16.02.020 (Exemptions from Land Use Permit Requirements), and Section 16.24.080 (Exceptions).

TABLE 16.24-1

UNDEVELOPED AND DEVELOPED STANDARDS AND PROCESSING REQUIREMENTS

Feature/Standard Undeveloped /
Natural
Both Undeveloped
and Developed
Portions of a Hillside
Area Site
Developed
Hillside Development
Plan Permit Applies.

Applies to the
Undeveloped / Natural
portions of the site that
were not previously
legally
disturbed/developed.

Exempt from Permit
for Developed
Portions where the
scope of work
involves ≤ 50 cubic
yards for flatwork,
pools, spas, or other
areas of the site that
300
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 15 of 65 ends

Exempt from Permit
for Developed
Portions where the
scope of work
involves ≤ 50 cubic
yards for flatwork,
pools, spas, or other
areas of the site that
have been legally
disturbed, and as
described under
Section 16.02.020
(Exemptions from
Land Use Permit
Requirements).

have been legally
disturbed, as described
under Section

16.02.020
(Exemptions from
Land Use Permit
Requirements).

Permit Evidence for
“Developed”
Classification
N/A

Grading permits and
records,
Building Permits /
Certificates of
Occupancy,
Approved Grading
Plans

Grading Permits and
Records,
Building permits /
Certificates of
Occupancy,
Approved Grading
Plans
Agricultural Uses as
it relates to a
“Developed”
Classification
N/A
“Developed” as it
relates to a disturbed
hillside area condition
does not include
agricultural uses or
improvements
customarily associated
with agricultural
operations, including
but not limited to crop
cultivation, grazing,
orchards, vineyards,
irrigation systems,
fencing, or agricultural
access roads. The
installation or
maintenance of such
agricultural
improvements shall
not, by itself, cause a
hillside area to be
considered
“developed” for
purposes of this
Chapter.
“Developed” as it
relates to a disturbed
hillside area condition
does not include
agricultural uses or
improvements
customarily associated
with agricultural
operations, including
but not limited to crop
cultivation, grazing,
orchards, vineyards,
irrigation systems,
fencing, or agricultural
access roads. The
installation or
maintenance of such
agricultural
improvements shall
not, by itself, cause a
hillside area to be
considered
“developed” for
purposes of this
Chapter.
301
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 16 of 65 ends

Evidence for
“Developed”
Classification
without Permit
History
N/A

Aerial Imagery.

Subject to review by
the Director for a
determination. If there
is a disagreement with
the determination, it
shall be referred to the
Planning Commission
for a final
determination.

Aerial Imagery.

Subject to review by
the Director for a
determination. If there
is a disagreement with
the determination, it
shall be referred to the
Planning Commission
for a final
determination.

Grading Permit Applies.

Applies to the
Undeveloped / Natural
portions of the subject
site that were not
previously legally
disturbed.

Applies if soil
disturbance exceeds 50
cubic yards and is
determined to be
exempt by the City
Engineer, per Section

15.52.030 (Permits
Required) and Section

15.52.040 (Permit
Exceptions).

For the developed
portion of a subject
site, a grading permit
is required if soil
disturbance exceeds 50
cubic yards and is
determined to be not
exempt by the City
Engineer, per review
of the criteria as
described under
Section 15.52.030
(Permits Required)
and Section 15.52.040
(Permit Exceptions).

Fine Grade and
Drainage Review N/A

Subject to City
Engineer review for
the developed portions
of the site, unless the
Fine Grade and
Drainage Review is
determined not to be
eligible, per Section

15.52.030 (Permits
Required) and Section

Subject to City
Engineer review,
unless the Fine Grade
Drainage Review is
determined not to be
eligible, per Section

15.52.030 (Permits
Required) and Section

15.52.040 (Permit
Exceptions).
302
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 17 of 65 ends

15.52.040 (Permit
Exceptions).

Accessory Dwelling
Units (ADUs) &
Accessory Structures

Approval of an ADU
is tolled for any
required discretionary
actions (e.g. grading
permit) per State law.

Approval of an ADU
is tolled for any
required discretionary
actions (e.g. grading
permit) per State law.

Approval of an ADU
is tolled for any
required discretionary
actions (e.g. grading
permit) per State law.

Approval of Accessory
Structures, 1,000 sq.
ft. or greater, requires
a Hillside
Development Permit

Approval of Accessory
Structures, 1,000 sq.
ft. or greater, requires
a Hillside
Development Permit

Approval of Accessory
Structures, 1,000 sq.
ft. or greater, requires
a Hillside
Development Permit

All Projects located
in a designated
Hillside Area

All components are
subject to hillside
design standards

All components are
subject to hillside
design standards

All components are
subject to hillside
design standards

16.24.030 Definitions.

For the purposes of this chapter the following definitions shall apply:

Agricultural Use. “Developed” as it relates to a disturbed hillside area condition does not include agricultural uses or improvements customarily associated with agricultural operations, including but not limited to crop cultivation, grazing, orchards, vineyards, irrigation systems, fencing, or agricultural access roads. The installation or maintenance of such agricultural improvements shall not, by itself, cause a hillside area to be considered “developed” for purposes of this Chapter.

City. The City of Murrieta, state of California, referred to in this development code as the “City.”

City Engineer. The director of Public Works/City Engineer of the city or their duly delegated representative.

City Manager. The official employed by an elected council to direct the administration of the City. See Chapter 2.08 “City Manager”

Clearing. The removal of vegetation (grass, brush, trees, and similar plant types) by hand or mechanical means (e.g. brushing, and/or grubbing).

Cluster Development. A concept where structures are grouped on certain portions of a site, frequently of different shapes and sizes, surrounded by large expanses of open space.

Contour. A line drawn on a plan that connects points of equal elevation. 303
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 18 of 65 ends

Cut. The mechanical removal of earth material.An act by which soil, sand, gravel, or rock is cut into, dug, quarried, uncovered, removed, or relocated, and shall include the conditions resulting therefrom.

Daylight Line. The line between the finished grade and natural terrain drawn by connecting points where pro-posed contours meet existing contours.

Developed. Means land that has been altered from its natural state through grading, excavation, fill placement, construction, paving, landscaping, or installation of infrastructure improvements.

Director. See Section 16.46.050 “Director.”

Elevation. Height or distance above mean sea level.

Erosion. The process by which the soil and rock components of the earth's crust are worn away and removed from one place to another by natural forces (e.g., as wind, and water)

Fill. A deposit of earth material placed by artificial means.deposit of soil, sand, gravel, rock, or other material placed by artificial means.

Finished Grade. The final elevation of the ground surface after development, that is in conformance with the approved plans.

Grading. To bring an existing surface to a designed form by excavating, filling, or landforming operations in excess of fifty (50) cubic yards.

Contour Grading. A grading concept designed to result in earth formsshaping that resembles natural terrain characteristics. Horizontal and vertical curve variations are often used for slope banks.

Conventional Grading. A grading concept that results in simple, straight forward, cut and fill lines and even planed slopesslopes. This is the most basic type of grading often resulting in an "engineered or man- made" appearance attributable to a lack of curvilinear or natural-appearing shapes.

Landform Grading. A grading method that replicates the irregular shapes of the natural slopesground surface. Landform graded slopesland surfaces are characterized by continuous series of concave and convex forms interspersed with mounds that blend into profiles, nonlinearity in plan view, varying slope gradients, and significant transition zones, between man-made and natural slopesland surfaces.

304
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 19 of 65 ends

Hillside Area. Land with an average rise or fall of twenty-five (25) percent or greater or a vertical rise of thirty (30) feet or moreMeans those areas specifically designated on a Hillside Overlay Map as adopted by the City Council under Section 16.24.100.

Mass Grading. The movement of large quantities of earth over large areas. Disruption of the majority of the on-site surface terrain resulting in a successive pad/terrace configuration. Modification or elimination of natural landforms may result.

Minimal Grading. A grading concept designed to minimize excavation and filling. Allows the movement of earth for projects (e.g., as individual building foundations, driveways, local roads, and utility excavation). The concept is associated with roads conforming closely to natural contours and with structures being built on natural terrain.

Pad. A level area created by grading to accommodate development.

Prominent Ridge. A ridge or hill location that is visible from Interstate 15, Interstate 215, or from an arterial or secondary street, that forms part of the skyline or is seen as a distinct edge against a backdrop of land.

Ridge. An extended, narrow, conspicuous elevation of land generally between valleys.

Slope. An inclined ground surface, the inclination of which is expressed as a ratio of the vertical distance (rise), or change in elevation, to the horizontal distance (run). The percent of a given slope is determined by dividing the rise by the run, multiplied by one hundred (100).

Undeveloped. Means land within a hillside area that remains in a substantially natural state and has not been significantly altered by grading, construction, paving, or installation of infrastructure improvements.

305
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 20 of 65 ends

Slope, Average. The method of determining average natural slope of land using the following equation:

I x L x .0023 where
A
I = Contour interval in feet.

L = Combined length in feet of contour lines measured on the project site. .0023 = A constant that converts square feet into acres and expresses slope in percent.

A = Project site area in acres.

Slope, Man-made. A manufactured slope consisting wholly or partially of either cut or filled material.

Slope, Natural. A slope that is not man-made.

Slope, Significant Natural. A slope that is not man-made that exceeds twenty-five (25) percent and a vertical rise of thirty (30) feet or more.

Slope Ratio. The relationship of a slope's horizontal length to vertical height, with the height specified as one (e.g. 2:1).

Slope Transition. The area where a slope plane changes to meet the natural terrain or a level graded area either vertically or horizontally.

16.24.040 Application Submittal Requirements.

Applications for development within the hillside overlay zoning district shall comply with the submittal requirements of this chapter. When a development project is a specific plan or master development plan, the submittal requirements shall be incorporated in the appropriate sections of the corresponding documents. If adequate detailed studies are provided with the specific plan and/or master development 306
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 21 of 65 ends

plan, subsequent implementing development applications shall be reviewed for substantial conformance with these plans.

Application filing requirements are as follows:

A. A Natural Features Map. This map shall identify slope banks, ridgelines, canyons, natural drainage courses, United States Geological Survey (U.S.G.S.) blueline streams, rock outcroppings, sensitive bioticbiological habitats, cultural resources, and other natural features for the purposes of project review and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis determined to be worthy of consideration for preservation.

B. A Conceptual Grading Plan. A conceptual grading plan shall be submitted at a minimum scale of one inch to two hundred (200) feet (this scale may be adjusted with the approval of the department). The plan shall include the following items:

1. A legend with appropriate symbols indicating high point, low point, spot elevations, pad and finished floor elevations, top of wall, top of curb, change in direction of drainage, and planned drainage improvements;

2. A separate map with proposed fill areas and cut areas, depths of these areas clearly shown in five- foot topographic lines. Quantities of each cut and fill area shall be clearly marked and calculated as a percentage of the total site area. The fill and cut areas shall be either colored green and red, respectively, cross-hatched, or screened to delineate the separate areas;

3. Contours for existing and proposed land conditions. Existing contours shall be depicted with a dashed line with every fifth contour darker, and proposed contours shall be depicted as above except with a solid line. Contours shall be shown at minimum intervals of five feet of change in elevation, with two- foot contours in the flatter areas (if using Riverside County flood control district topographic maps, a four-foot interval may be used); and

4. Additional information as required to assist department review of the project.

B. Overall Conceptual Grading Plan. An overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted at a minimum scale of one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet). The plan shall include the following items:

1. A legend with symbols identifying the following, but not limited to: high point, low point, spot elevations, pad, top of wall, top of footing, top of curb, top of ground surface on both sides of a retaining wall, and planned drainage improvements;

2. A separate map shall be provided with proposed cut and fill areas, depths of these identified areas shown in five-foot topographic lines. Quantities of each cut and fill area shall be identified and calculated as a percentage of the total site area. The cut and fill areas shall be either colored green and red, cross- hatched, or screened to delineate each respective area;

3. Contours for existing and proposed topographic conditions shall be provided within submitted plan exhibits. Existing contours shall be depicted with continuous screened lines and proposed contours shall be depicted as above except with a solid line. Contours shall be shown at minimum intervals of two feet of change in elevation. Elevations of less than two feet shall be depicted with spot elevations; and

4. Additional information as required to assist with review of the project.

307
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 22 of 65 ends

C. Drainage Map. A conceptual drainage and flood control facilities map describing planned drainage improvements. The map shall utilize cityCity standards or an acceptable alternate as determined by the city engineerCity Engineer or their designee.

D. Slope Analysis Map. A slope analysis map for the purpose of determining the quantity amount and location of land as it exists in its natural state and for calculating average slope categories. A base topographical map forof the site shall be prepared and shall have a scale of not less than one inch to onetwo hundred (100200) feet. The base topographical map shall include adjoining properties within one hundred (100) feet of the site boundaries to portray the site's context. Slope bands in contrasting colors shall be delineated in the range of zero to twenty-five (0—25) percent, twenty-six to fifty (26—50) percent, and fifty (50) percent or greater. A tabulation of the land area by slope percentage shall also be provided.

The exact method for computing the percent slope and area of each slope category shall be sufficiently de-scribed and presented so that a review can be readily made. A heavy solid line indicating the twenty- five (25) percent grade differential shall be clearly marked on the plan. An eight and one-half by eleven (8 1/2 x 11) inch legible acetate reduction of the slope analysis with appropriate legend shall also be provided.

DE. Slope Profile Drawings. A sufficient number of slope profiles shall be provided to clearly illustrate the ex-tent of the proposed grading. A minimum of four cCross-section slope profiles shall be included with the slope analysis. Additional profiles may be required as determined by the city engineerCity Engineer or their designee. The slope profiles shall:

1. Be drawn at the same scale and indexed, or keyed, to the slope analysis map, grading grading plan, and project site map. Both vertical and horizontal scales shall be indicated;

2. Show existing and proposed topography, structures, and infrastructure. Proposed topography, structures, and infrastructures shall be drawn with a thin, solid line. Existing topography and features shall be drawn with a dashed line;

3. Extend at a minimum of least one hundred (100) feet outside the project site boundary to clearly show the impact on adjacent property. Additional distance may be necessary to determine off-site terrain and features;

4. Be drawn along those portions of the subject site where:

a. The greatest portion of the site where alteration of existing topography is proposed;

b. The most intensive or massive development portion of the site where development is proposed (e.g. where structures are proposed);

c. The site is most visible from surrounding land uses; and

cd. Where proposed gradinggrading willwould potentially impact existing natural drainage conditions.

5. At least two of the slope profiles shall be roughly parallel to each other and roughly perpendicular to existing contourcontour lines. At least one other slope profile shall be roughly at a ninety (90) degree angle to the other slope profiles and existing contour lines. 308
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 23 of 65 ends

F. Indicate Source of Data. Both the slope analysis and slope profiles shall Iindicate the datum, source, data, and scale of topographic data used in the slope analysis and slope profiles.

G. Geotechnical Report. A geotechnical and soils report, shall be prepared by a registered geotechnical engineer to cityCity standards and provide in sufficient detail to substantiate and support the design concepts presented in the application as submitted. Additional environmental technical studies and investigations, including, but not limited to, hydrologic, seismic, access/circulation, cultural, tribal cultural, and biota researchbiological resources may also be required to help in the determination of the buildable area of a subject site for consistency with project review and for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis.

H. Objective Design Guidelines. Objective Ddesign guidelines shall be provided for projects that are to be reviewed by the Planning Ccommission. Otherwise, illustrative building elevationselevations showing all sides of the structure shall be provided.

I. No Grading Proposed. In the event that no grading is proposed, (e.g., custom lot subdivision) a statement to that effect shall be filed with a plan that shows possible future house plotting, pad grading, driveway de-sign, and septic system location for each parcel proposed. The plan shall be prepared on a topographic map drawn at a scale of one inch to two hundred (200) feet.See 16.24.080 (Exceptions) for applicability.

J. Additional Information. The following items may be required if determined necessary by the directorCity Engineer or their designee to aid in the analysis of the proposed project:

1. A line of sight or view analysis;

2. Photographic and/or computer generatedcomputer-generated graphic renderings; or

3. A topographic model and/or large scalelarge-scale detailed partial model; or

4. Other illustrative techniques determined necessary to aid in review of the project.

K. Exceptions to the filing requirements shall be determined by the director.

16.24.050 Project Review Procedures.

Projects within designated hillside areas shall be subject to review and approval by the director or the commission in compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

A. Director Approval. The director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny development proposal applications when the following conditions apply:

1. Development plan permits;

2. Extensions of time; or

3. Building permit reviews.

309
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 24 of 65 ends

B. Commission Approval. The commission shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny development proposal applications when one or more of the following conditions apply:

1. When padded building sites are proposed; , or

2. Proposals referred to the commission by the director.

C. Modification of Requirements. The commission may modify or waive a development standard:

when an improved or more sensitive design will result. Further, where it can be demonstrated that imposing hillside development standards would either render a parcel unbuildable and create a loss of its reasonable economic use, or place an undue restriction on the improvement of the property, development consistent with the general plan shall be allowed subject to approval by the commission, if the following findings can be made:

a. The site is physically suitable for the design and siting of the proposed development. The proposed development will result in minimum disturbance of environmentally sensitive areas;

b. The grading proposed in connection with the development will not result in soil erosion, silting of lower slopes, flooding, severe scarring or other geological instability or fire hazard that would affect health, safety and general welfare as determined by the city engineer;

c. The proposed development retains the visual quality of the site, the aesthetic qualities of the area and the neighborhood characteristics by utilizing proper structural scale and character, varied architectural treatments, and appropriate plant materials; and

d. The proposed development is in conformance with the qualitative development standards and guidelines as established in this chapter and is conformance with the goals, objectives and policies of the general plan.

1. When an improved or more environmentally sensitive design would result. Further, where it can be demonstrated that imposing the objective hillside development standards would either render a parcel unbuildable and create a loss of its reasonable economic use, or place an undue restriction on the improvement of the property, development consistent with the City’s General Plan shall be allowed subject to approval by the Planning Commission, if the following findings can be made:

a. The site is physically suitable for the design and siting of the proposed development. The proposed development will result in minimum disturbance of environmentally sensitive areas;

b. The grading in connection with the development would not result in soil erosion, silting of lower slopes, flooding, severe scarring, create other geological instability conditions, or a fire hazard condition that would affect the public’s health, safety and general welfare for the City, as determined by the City Engineer.

16.24.060 Hillside Development Standards.

The following are minimum standards and shall apply to a use, development, or alteration of land in compliance with Section 16.24.020 (Applicability). These standards are supplemented by the provisions of the development guidelines contained in Section 16.24.070 (Hillside Development Guidelines) of this chapter.

310
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 25 of 65 ends

A. Hillside Slope Categories. The following descriptionscategories serve as general standardsguidelines for determining the applicability of hillside slopeconditions at a subject site categories to ensure that development will compliment the overall character of the landform.

TABLE 16.24-2

HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

% Natural
Slope
Category
Standards
Up toUnder
25%
This is not considered a hillside condition. Please note that slope calculations shall not be rounded to the nearest whole number.
25% and
Over up
tobut less
than 50%
This is a hillside condition. Development within this slope category is limited to the less visually prominent slopesslopes of a subject site, and then only where it can be showndemonstrated that gradinggrading, vegetation removal, safety, and environmental and aesthetic, and other environmental impacts arecan be minimized. Potential Iimpacts of from site access and roadways shall be minimized by following natural contourscontours or using grade separations.

Proposed Sstructures shall blend with the natural landform through their shape, material, and utilization of natural occurring color(s). Special hillside architectural and design techniques are required, which may include the use of larger lots, variable setbacks, and variable building structural techniques and clustering. Padded building sites may be considered in some instances.

Where this occurs, the commission may consider padded building sites adjacent to special features when it is found that grading of padded building sites will create a better relationship between the special feature(s) and the building sites.Please note that slope calculations shall not be rounded to the nearest whole number.
50% and
over(1)
This is an excessive slope condition, and development is prohibited. (1) This applies to the property as a whole.

B. Site Design.

1. Projects located in hillside areas shall incorporate clustering, variable setbacks, multiple orientations, and other site planning techniques to preserve open spaces, protect natural features, and offer views to residents.

311
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 26 of 65 ends

2. When clustering techniques are usedutilized, the minimum lot sizes may be decreased to five thousand (5,000) square feet when it is necessary to preserve sensitive lands (e.g., hillsides, creeks, habitat areas, etc.). Lots may be allowed smaller than five thousand (5,000) square feet, but not smaller than four thousand (4,000) square feet, for up to twenty (20) percent of the total approved lots and only under an approved specific plan when absolutely necessary to preserve sensitive and hillside areasHillside Areas. Lots under five thou-sandthousand (5,000) square feet are prohibited in slope areas of twenty-five (25) percent or greater.

C. Driveways and Roadways.

1. Driveways shall be designed in a manner as to when a vehicle is entering a public /and /or private streets, maintaining adequate sight distance shall be maintained as determined by the city engineerCity Engineer or their designee.

2. Driveways shall not be located within three feet of a side property line. Exceptions to this standard may be considered based on lot size, percentage of slope, appropriate drainage facilities and use as a common (joint) driveway by the City Engineer or their designee.

3. Only slopesslopes less than fifty (50) percent (2:1) shall be allowedpermitted adjacent to driveways.

4. Driveway grades above fifteen (15) percent may only be considered by the City Engineer or their designee when driveways are aligned with the natural contourscontours of the land, and are necessary to achieve effective site design, and safety considerations are met to the satisfaction of the building and safety official, city engineer, and the fire departmentbuilding and safety official, City Engineer, or designee, and fire code official. Proper dDesign considerations shall be employed, including the use of vertical curves. On proposed driveways that may be approved with a slope greater than fifteen (15) percent, a coarse, all-weather paving material (e.g. asphalt or concrete), or grooves for traction, shall be incorporated into the designconstruction.

5. Roadways shall conform to the natural landform. Significant alterations to the physical and visual character of a hillside shall be avoided by eliminating large notches in ridgelines and wide straight alignments. Modified or reduced widthreduced-width road sections and split sections shall be considered in the layout of hillside streets to reduce gradinggrading and cutscuts in topography while allowing access for fire trucks and other emergency vehicles.
312
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 27 of 65 ends

313
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 28 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-1

ROADWAY PLACEMENT

6. Where road construction is proposed in hillside areas, the standards shall be consistent with those identified for high fire hazard areas, the California Fire Code, and with City design standards.

7. The extent of vegetation and visual disruption shall be minimized by the combined use of retaining structures and regrading to approximate natural slopesslopes. The view along a street frontage shall be screened with landscaping and the maintenance of views shall be preserved as demonstrated on the project plans. shall provide a pleasant appearance with a sense of open space and landscaping. The use of terraced walls and landscaping to reduce grading impact associated with retaining walls is a recommended design technique to address this visual impactencouraged.

8. Wet utilities shall be placed in the road right-of-way, where feasible, and approved by the reviewing agency.

9. AppropriateScaled roadway drainage facilities and grades shall be provided consistent with City design standards.

D. Architecture.

1. The building envelope for primary structures, except for padded building sites,The maximum structure height shall be thirty (30) feet. Refer to Section 16.18.080.A (Maximum Height) for additional criteria on how to calculate the maximum height for a sloped parcel.as follows:

a. Downhill Lot. The maximum structure height shall be thirty (30) feet, measured from finished grade at the front setback line extending towards the rear of the lot. The maximum height at the side setbacks shall be fifteen (15) feet extending up toward the center of the lot at a forty-five (45) degree angle to a maximum height of thirty (30) feet as measured from finished grade. 314
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 29 of 65 ends

FIGURE 3-4

BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR DOWNHILL LOT

b. Uphill Lot. The maximum structure height shall be fifteen (15) feet, measured from finished grade at the front setback line extending up towards the rear of the lot at a forty-five- (45-) degree angle to a maxi-mum height of thirty (30) feet. The maximum height at the side setbacks shall be fifteen (15) feet extending up towards the center of the lot at a forty-five- (45-) degree angle to a maximum height of thirty (30) feet as measured from finished grade.

FIGURE 3-5

BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR UPHILL LOT

c. Cross Slope Lot. The maximum structure height shall be thirty (30) feet, measured from finished grade at the maximum front setback line extending towards the rear of the lot. The maximum height at the side setbacks shall be fifteen (15) feet extending up towards the center of the lot at a forty- five-(45-) degree angle to a maximum of thirty (30) feet as measured from finished grade. 315
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 30 of 65 ends

FIGURE 3-6

BUILDING ENVELOPE FOR CROSS LOT SLOPE

ad. Architectural Projections Allowed. Architectural projections and variations in roof design are encouraged. Projections above the maximum height limits for architectural features may be allowed subject to approval by the directorDirector.

2. In steeper terrain, Rreduction of front yard setbacks may be considered in order to minimize rear yard grading.

3. Architectural treatments shall be provided on all sides of a structure. Elements of the architectural treatment used on the front facade shall be repeated on all sides of a structure with additional emphasis on those elevations visible from public rights-of-way.

43. Building materials and color schemes shall blend with the natural landscape. Colors shall be of earth tones and the value (lightness or darkness) of the specific hue shall be as close to that of the immediately surrounding landscape as possible as demonstrated on the project plans. Where exterior stucco is used, it shall have a final coat of integrated color in a muted earth tone. Contrasting color accents shall be kept to a minimum.

54. Treated wood or materials of a wood-like appearance, having the necessary fire retardant characteristics. are a design optionencouraged for exterior surfaces. Use of other natural materials (e.g., river rock) is also strongly encourageda design option as well. The reflectivity of exposed surfaces (walls, roofs, windows, frames, and paved surfaces) shall be mitigated bywith the incorporation of overhangs, trellises, planting, and similar features.

65. Exterior lighting shall be located and shielded so as to not impact adjacent property owners in terms of glare and privacy in compliance with Section 16.18.100 (Lighting).

E. Walls and Fences.

TABLE 16.24-3
RETAINING WALLS – WITHIN HILLSIDE AREAS
Criteria
Up to Three Feet Within Front or
Street-Side Setback
Walls within the required front yard
or street-side setback shall not
exceed three feet in height, shall be
separated by a minimum of three
feet, and shall incorporate
landscaping to screen the wall(s).
316
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 31 of 65 ends

Line-of-Sight Locations/Visibility
Triangles
For any required line–of–sight
locations, or visibility triangles, a
maximum of thirty inches in height
shall be permitted.

Up to Six Feet. Where multiple terraced retaining
walls are designed to retain larger
slopes, they shall not exceed six
feet in height. Refer to Figure

16.24-2.

Over Six Feet Prohibited, unless the applicant
seeks a waiver or modification. The
director may waive or modify the
requirements of this standard if the
following findings can be made:

That the waiver of modification, as
applied to the project, will not
adversely impact adjoining
properties; and

That the waiver or modification will
not be contrary to the public health,
safety, and general welfare; and

That the waiver or modification will
ensure that the retaining wall
incorporates additional screening
measures where a wall would be
visible from the public right-of-
way, including, but not limited to,
the use of earth-tone colors and/or
landscaping, in order to maintain
visual compatibility with the
surrounding hillside area.

Over Six Feet and as Part of the
Structure.

Walls that are an integral part of the
primary structure may exceed six
feet in height; however, their visual
impact shall be mitigated through
contour grading and landscape
treatment. Refer to Figure 16.24-3.

Required Offset At six feet in height, a retaining
wall shall be separated by a
minimum of six feet horizontally.

Refer to Figure 16.24-2.

317
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 32 of 65 ends

1. Retaining walls, not exceeding six feet in height, may be allowed to reduce grading, preserve natural features, or increase soil stabilization. Within the required front yard setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height.

2. Where multiple (terraced) walls are designed to retain larger slopes they shall not exceed six feet in height and shall be separated by a minimum of six feet horizontally. A maximum of two walls shall be placed together. Walls within the required front yard setback shall not exceed three feet in height and shall be separated by a minimum of three feet and shall incorporate landscaping to screen the wall(s).

FIGURE 3-716.24-2

HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALLS

3. Walls that are an integral part of the primary structure may exceed six feet in height; however, their visual impact shall be mitigated through contour grading and landscape treatment. 318
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 33 of 65 ends

FIGURE 3-816.24-3

RETAINING WALL AS PART OF PRIMARY STRUCTURE

4. Crib walls may be approved on a case by case basis if it can be demonstrated that excessive height is not being created and provisions for extensive landscaping are incorporated.

5. Walls and fences shall incorporate materials and colors used in an adjacent structures. Naturally occur-ring materials (e.g., river rock, flagstone, etc.) shall be used whenever possible.

6. Walls and fencing visible from the public right-of-way shall be designed to incorporate visual interest through variation in placement, use of planters, differing materials, and modulation of the wall plane.

7. Walls and fences shall follow landform grading shapes and contours. 319
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 34 of 65 ends

1. Retaining walls may be permitted when used to reduce grading, preserve natural features, or improve soil stabilization.

2. Split‑face block, crib walls, keystone systems, retaining walls with stone veneer, and similar designs may be utilized.

3. The color palette and materials of a retaining wall or similar wall system should utilize earth‑tone colors and be consistent with the predominant hues and materials of the adjacent hillsides.

4. If landscaping is proposed to be utilized in conjunction with a retaining or similar wall system, plant materials should be appropriate for the local climate and suited to the wall’s sun exposure.

FIGURE 16.24-4

EXAMPLE OF DECORATIVE RETAINING WALL WITH A STONE VENEER

320
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 35 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-5

EXAMPLE OF SPLIT FACE RETAINING WALL

FIGURE 16.24-6

EXAMPLE OF KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL

321
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 36 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-7

EXAMPLE OF KEYSTONE RETAINING WALL WITH LANDSCAPING

5. Retaining Walls visible from the public right-of-way shall be designed to provide variation in placement, use of planters, differing materials, and modulation of the wall plane to help emulate the pre- existing hillside contours.

6. Retaining Walls shall follow landform grading shapes and contours.

7. Tubular steel or wrought-iron safety fencing may be necessary in conjunction with retaining wall locations. If necessary, these wall locations are to provide for landscape safety maintenance personnel.

Construction shall be consistent with the California Building Code (CBC) and related codes.

FE. Landscaping. Revegetation in hillside areas shall reflect the visual patterns found naturally in local canyons and valleys. The landscaping as viewed from urban areas and the arterial roadway system shall mask and screen man-made structures.

1 . Indigenous, or naturalized plants that blend naturally with the landscape shall be utilized in areas where planting is required. The plant selection shall be deep-rooted, drought-tolerant, and fire-resistant.

2. Natural landform planting shall be used to soften manufactured slopes, reduce the impact of development on steep slopes or ridgelines. and provide erosion control. These landscape techniques shall serve to reintroduce landscape patterns that occur naturally in the hillsides. 322
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 37 of 65 ends

323
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 38 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-8

NATURAL LANDFORM PLANTING

3. A "vegetative backdrop" shall be maintained by replanting with native trees or the same vegetation that was removed. The vegetation should screen structures to the extent possible at maturity and preserve the appearance of the natural skyline.

3. A “vegetative backdrop” shall be maintained by replanting the site with native trees and/or providing the same vegetation that was removed, consistent with City landscaping standards. As demonstrated in the project plans, the proposed vegetation shall be sized and spaced appropriately to screen structures from the growth of the species at maturity and to preserve the appearance of the natural skyline.

4. The surface of graded or disturbed slopes with three feet or greater vertical height shall be protected against damage by erosion through the planting of deep rooted ground cover as demonstrated on the project plans. Slopes exceeding eight feet in vertical height shall be planted with ground cover and a combination ofof shrubs and trees that have a high "root-to-shoot" ratio. The size of shrubs and trees shall be determined based on the individual project area as deemed appropriate by the department and/or Planning Ccommission.

5. Jute mesh or an equivalent shall be required when planting occurs between August fifteenth and April fifteenth, and when determined, as necessary, by a soils engineer and/or licensed landscape architect. Jute mesh shall be used in combination with required plantings as outlined in the slope landscaping guidelines available on the City of Murrieta’s website for optimal long-term slope stabilization.

6. Indigenous, native vegetation shall be retained and supplemented within canyons and along natural drainage courses where grading does not occur, provided that it conforms with fuel modification and tire prevention plans.

324
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 39 of 65 ends

7. Common open areas and front and side yards adjacent to a street shall be adequately landscaped and irrigated. The areas shall be provided with native plant materials that blend with the natural character of the surrounding landscape.

7. Common open space areas, front, and side yards adjacent to a street shall be landscaped and irrigated consistent with City landscaping and fire protection standards. These areas shall be provided with native plant materials that blend with the natural character of the surrounding landscape.

8. In order to protect slopes from soil erosion and slippage and to facilitate revegetation, an automatic irrigation system shall be installed on slopes with planting. Design and operation of the irrigation system shall respect the special conditions that exist in hillside situations specific to maintaining slope stabilization and integrity. In all cases, the emphasis shall be toward using plant materials that may eventually not need to be irrigated: therefore, temporary irrigation systems may be used as approved by the city's landscape architect and city engineer. Water and energy conservation techniques shall be utilized (e.g., drip irrigation, alluvial rockscape, etc.) Where irrigation systems are installed above ground, ultraviolet light resistant. brown line or other approved color, shall be used.

8. In order to protect slopes from soil erosion and failure, and to facilitate revegetation, and automatic irrigation system shall be installed on slopes with planting. Design and operation of the irrigation system shall respect the special conditions that exist in hillside situations specific to maintaining slope stabilization and integrity. In all cases, the emphasis shall be toward using plant materials that may eventually not need to be irrigated; therefore, temporary irrigation systems may be used as approved by the City’s landscape architect and City Engineer. Water and energy conservation techniques shall be utilized (e.g. drip irrigation, alluvial rockscape, etc.). Where irrigation systems are installed above ground, ultraviolet light-resistant brown line, or other approved color, shall be used.

9. A permanent fuel modification area shall be required around development projects that are adjacent or exposed to hazardous fire areas for the purpose of fire protection. The fuel modification area shall be maintained by its owners, a homeowners' association, or other public nonprofit agency or conveyed in a public easement. Adequate provisions shall be made for the continual maintenance of these areas and the fire chief may require brush, vegetation, or debris to be removed and cleared consistent with the provisions of Chapter 8.32 of the municipal code. Where feasible, fuel modification areas shall be designated as common open space rather than private open space. The recommended width of the fuel modification area shall be based on applicable building and fire codes and the recommendations of the fire chief with consideration given to:

a. A worst-case Santa Ana wind condition;

b. The natural ungraded slope of the land within the project and in the areas adjacent to the project;

c. Fuel loading:

d. Access to the project by fire suppression equipment. and access directly to the fuel modified area, and egress out of the project in case of evacuation;

e. The on-site availability of water that can be used for fire fighting purposes with regard to fire flows, water pressure, and duration:

f. "Built-in" fire protection within structures (i.e., sprinklers etc.);

g. Soil erosion and sediment control measures; and

325
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 40 of 65 ends

h. The fire department fuel modification policy document.

10. Fuel modification areas shall also incorporate soil erosion and sediment control measures to alleviate permanent scarring and accelerated erosion.

9. A permanent fuel modification area shall be required around projects that are located within high or very-high fire severity zone, adjacent to a high or very-high fire severity zone, or exposed to hazardous fire areas for the purpose of fire protection. The fuel modification area shall be maintained by its owners, a homeowners' association, or other public nonprofit agency, or conveyed within a public easement.

Adequate provisions shall be made for the continual maintenance of these areas, and the fire code official may require brush, vegetation, combustible item(s), or debris to be removed, cleared, and maintained, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 8.32 of the Municipal Code. Where feasible, fuel modification areas shall be designated as common open space rather than private open space. The recommended width of the fuel modification area shall be based on applicable building and fire codes and the recommendations of the fire code official with consideration given to:

a. A worst-case Santa Ana wind condition;

b. The natural ungraded slope of the land within the project and in the areas adjacent to the project;

c. Fuel load;

d. All weather access to the project by fire suppression equipment and personnel, access directly to the fuel modified area, and egress out of the project area in case of evacuation;

e. The on-site availability of water that can be used for firefighting purposes with regard to fire flows, water pressure, and duration;

f. "Built-in" fire protection within structures (i.e., sprinklers etc.);

g. Soil erosion and sediment control measures;

h. The fire department fuel modification policy and the Wild Urban Interface Undesirable Plants & Trees list;

i. Fuel modification zones for landscaping as outlined by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

10. Fuel modification areas shall also incorporate soil erosion and sediment control measures to alleviate permanent scarring and accelerated erosion.

G. Grading.

1. GradingGrading shall not take place on natural slopesslopes that exceed fifty (50) percent.

2. Slopes created by grading of the site shall not exceed fifty (50) percent or 2:1, without a soils report and stabilization study indicating a greater permissible slope. Slopes shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in height between terraces or benches, except that the commission may permit slopes exceeding these dimensions where the slopes will result in a natural appearance and will not create geological or erosion hazards. The soils report and stabilization study will be subject to third party review prior to approval by 326
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 41 of 65 ends

the city. Refer to the hillside development guidelines (16.24.070) for methods to accomplish this standard.

2. Slopes created by grading of the site shall not exceed fifty (50) percent or 2:1. Slopes exceeding 2:1 but less than or equal to 1.5:1 may be considered upon additional analysis by a licensed geotechnical engineer. Slopes shall not exceed thirty (30) feet in height between terraces or benches, except that the Planning Commission may permit slopes exceeding these dimensions where the slopes will result in a natural appearance and will not create geological or erosion hazards. The soils report and stabilization study shall be subject to third-party review prior to approval by the City.

3. Structures shall not visually impair ridgeline silhouettes. Structures are not permitted closer to a prominent ridge than fifty (50) feet measured vertically on a cross-section or one hundred fifty (150) feet horizontally on a topographic map. whichever is more restrictive. Exceptions to this requirement for public facilities. utilities. and infrastructure necessary to serve the public health, safety, and welfare may be considered by the commission.

3. In order to help address visual impacts at Prominent Ridgelines, the use of the combination of naturally occurring vegetation (trees/shrubs) and proposed landscaping shall be implemented to screen proposed structures at these locations. Alternatively, earth tone colors can be used as a design option if landscape screening is not feasible. Additionally, any required Fuel Modification Zone and California Fire Code standards shall be considered in the design of this screening method, blending with the terrain and existing vegetation.

4. ClearingClearing and/or grubbing, excavation, orand other earth disturbances shall not be permittedinitiated on hillside areashillside areas prior to the issuance of a gradinggrading permit,. with the exception of county/state authorized soils remediation operations, drill holes, and exploratory trenches for the collection of geologic and soil data or for weed abatement activities. Trenches are to be properly backfilled and in addition, erosionerosion treatment provided where slopesslopes exceed twenty-five (25) percent.

5. Manufactured cutcut and fillfill slopesslopes exceeding ten feet in height which willwould be either exposed to public view, or are adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas, shall be landformlandform or contourcontour graded, where physically feasible, so that their ultimate appearance will resemble a natural slope. This will include slopesslopes alongadjacent to streets and highways, slopesslopes, adjacent to parks, schools, open spaces, and other public facilities and other prominent slopesslopes. Refer to the hillside development guidelines (16.24.070) for methods to accomplish this standard.

6. LandformLandform gradinggrading shall be used where zero to twenty-five (0-25) percent (non- hillside) slopesslopes intersect with twenty-five to fifty (25-50) percent (hillside) slopesslopes. Proper transitioning from manufactured slopesslopes created by conventionalconventional gradinggrading methods to natural slopesslopes shall be achieved gradually and naturally through the use of radii or irregular curvilinear shapes that will blend into the adjoining topography tangentially and not create abrupt changes.

7. FillFill slopesslopes shall not be placed perpendicularly across a canyon. Straight line cutcut ofF fillof fill slopesslopes shall not be made to appear like a dam. The terminus of the fillfill shall, instead, be concave in shape to restore the can-yoncanyon appearance. This concave configuration shall be in combination with the use of substantially flatter slope ratiosslope ratios (4:1, 3.5:1, 3: I ) at or near the center of this indentation. Symmetrical or unsymmetrical con-cave configurations shall be used depending upon the adjoining or underlying topographic characteristics.

327
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 42 of 65 ends

8. Minimal radius rounding at the edges of cutcut and fillfill slopesslopes is not an acceptable method. Proper Ttransitioning from manufactured slopesslopes to natural slopesslopes shall be achieved gradually and naturally through the use of radii or irregular curvilinear shapes that will blend into the adjoining topography tangentially and not create abrupt changes.

9. In the planning, design, and development of public utilities and infrastructure, every reasonable effort as demonstrated shall be made to minimize gradinggrading impacts and incorporates a design that follows harmonize with the natural contourscontours and character of the land.

10. Side yard slopesslopes and low (less than twenty (20) feet in height) rear yard slopesslopes (less than twenty (20) feet in height) whose view is blocked by future structures need not have landform design applied.

11. GradingGrading shall be phased so that prompt revegetation or construction will control erosionerosion. Where possible,. only those areas that will be built on, resurfaced, or landscaped shall be disturbed. Top soil shall be stockpiled during the rough gradinggrading phase and usedutilized on padspads or revegetated habitat areas, upon the recommendation of the soils engineer. Refer to the hillside development guidelines for methods to accomplish this standard.

12. Applicable requirements of the cityCity and state shall be complied with in conjunction with athe latest National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit prior to the issuance of a gradinggrading permit., whichThis may include, but is not limited to, an Grading Plan, and ErosionErosion Control Plan, Best Management Plan (including Notice of Intent to be filed with the state Water Resources Control Board)(During Construction and Post-Construction Phases) and Construction Monitoring Program.

H. Drainage.

1. Debris basins, energy dissipatingenergy-dissipating devices, and down drains shall be provided, where necessary, to reduce erosionerosion when gradinggrading is undertaken in the hillside areashillside areas. Natural drainage courses shouldshall be retained where health and safety can be maintainedare not jeopardized. Drainage courses retained in a natural state shall be protected from gradinggrading activity.

In instances where a crossing is required,. a natural crossing and bank protection shall be a preferreddesign option over steel and concrete systems. Where drainage structures are required, they shall be naturalized with coloration, plant materials, native rocks and/or concealment with gradinggrading techniques.

2. Drainage channels, slope drainage devices, interceptor drains and terrace drains shouldshall be placed in less visible locations as demonstrated on the project plans and evaluated for erosion. Down drains shall be hidden in swales diagonally or curvilinear across a slope face. In this manner they will be built into the overall landform of the slope. They shouldshall also receive a naturalizing treatment, which may include native rock, colored concrete, and/or landscaping so that the structure appears as an integral part of the environment. In all cases, a concrete liner shall be used in addition to a naturalizing treatment as demonstrated on the project plans and evaluated for erosion. 328
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 43 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-9

NATURALIZED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LANDFORMING

3. Cross lotCross-lot drainage usage shall be minimized. In situations where this is not possible using conventional design., optional techniques (e.g., single loaded streets, reduced densities, etc.) shall be 329
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 44 of 65 ends

considered. Use of cross lotcross-lot drainage may be considered only after demonstration that this method will not adversely affect the proposed lots or adjacent properties, and that it is absolutely required in order to minimize the amount of gradinggrading which would result with conventional drainage practices.

4. Where cross lot drainage is utilized, the following shall apply:

a. Project Interiors. One lot may drain across one other lot if a maintenance easement is provided within either an improved, open “V”-swale gutter which has a naturalized appearance, or within a closed drainage pipe that shall be a minimum twelve (12) inches in diameter. This drainage shall be conveyed to either to a public street or to a drainage easement. If drainage is conveyed to a private easement, it shall be maintained by its owners or a Homeowners' Association; otherwise,. the drain-agedrainage shall be conveyed to a public easement. The easement width shall be determined on an individual basis and shall be dependent on appropriate hydrologic studies and access requirements. Irrigation lines shall be placed above swales to minimize the impacts in the event of a system failure. When irrigation lines cross an open “V”-swale they shall be placed into a galvanized pipe, which is to be clamped to the soil on both sides of the swale subject to the review of the directorCity Engineer or their designee.

b. Project Boundaries. On-site drainage shall be conveyed in an improved open “V”-swale gutter, which has a naturalized appearance, or within an underground pipe in either a private drainage easement, that is to be maintained by its owners or a homeowners' association, or it shall be conveyed in a public easement. The easement width shall be a minimum of ten feet. A greater width may be determined necessary on an individual basis and shall be dependent on appropriate hydrologic studies and access requirements.

I. Public Safety.

1. Residential developments shall be constructed in a manner so as to reduce the potential for spread of brushfireswildfires as follows:

a. In the case of a conflict where more restrictive provisions are contained in the uniformadopted and/or locally adopted version(s) of the California Building Code building code or in the uniform fire codeCalifornia Fire Code, the more restrictive provisions shall apply.

b. Roofs shall be covered with noncombustible materials (e.g., clay tile, concrete shake, tile, or similar materials). Open ends shall be stopped in order to prevent bird nests, or other combustible material, lodging within the roof and to prevent entry of flames.

c. Exterior walls and fences shall be surfaced with noncombustible or flame resistive materials.

Alternate surface materials may be approved subject to the approval of the fire chiefcode official and Bbuilding Oofficial. Except as otherwise provided herein, exterior walls shall extend to the ground.

d. Balconies., patio roofs, eaves and other similar overhangs shall be of noncombustible or flame resistive materials.

e. Plastic webbing, split or whole bamboo, reed or straw-like materials, corrugated plastic or fiberglass materials, and similar flammable materials are not permitted for use on patio covers.

f. Vents for attics and underfloor areas shall be designed and located to minimize the likelihood of spreading the spread of fire.
330
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 45 of 65 ends

g. Chimneys shall be provided with approved spark arresters.

2. Adequate water supply and pressure for proposed development shall be required in compliance with the proposed development shall be required in compliance with the fire department Standards.

3. The fire chiefcode official shall require brush, vegetation, or combustible debris to be removed and cleared within ten feet on each side of every roadway and access drive, and may enter upon private property to do so. This requirement shall not apply to single specimens of trees, ornamental shrubbery, or cultivated groundcover provided they do not form a means of readily transmitting fire.

4. If the fire chiefcode official determines in a specific case that difficult terrain, danger of erosionerosion, or other unusual circumstances make strict compliance with the clearance of vegetation undesirable or impractical, he or she may suspend enforcement thereof and require reasonable alternative measures designed to advance the purposes of this chapter.

5. Site design shall provide for all-weather equipment access to publicly maintained slope areas for maintenance and emergency purposes. Secondary access shall be provided, or an alternative method may be considered by the fire code official with evidence to ensure public safety.

6. Structures and facilities shall be restricted in geologically hazardous areas.

7. Special construction features shall be required in the design of structures where site investigations con-firmconfirm potential geologic hazards.

8. Development not on public sewers shall be permitted only after site specific investigations have been conducted that demonstrate the soils are suitable for on-site wastewater disposal and the disposal of wastewater will not degrade the subsurface water quality.

9. Due to the hazard associated with saturated soils in areas of steep slopesslopes, irrigation systems in critical areas that have the potential for failure in the judgement of the city engineerCity Engineer, or their designee, shall be required to be equipped with potentiometers to make sure that the systems will not operate when there is sufficient moisture in the soil.

16.24.070 Hillside Development Guidelines.

The hillside development guidelines are intended to illustrate and amplify the appropriate development concepts for designated hillside areashillside areas. The guidelines are not intended to be an exhaustive list of standards, but rather policy statements, to encourage development that is sensitive to the unique characteristics common to hillside properties. The guidelines allow for flexibility and they encourage creativity, especially where a specific plan is prepared. How-everHowever, the objective development standards provided in Section 16.24.060 shall be considered as a "benchmark" against which hillside development proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the purposes of this chapter.

The guideline's purpose is to allow for innovative or alternate methods of design in hillside areashillside areas. Innovation is encouraged as long as the end result is one that respects the natural character of the hillside and is consistent with the purposes of this chapter and the goals, objectives and policies of the City’s Ggeneral Pplan .

331
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 46 of 65 ends

Conformance with the guidelines willshall be incorporated in the preparation and approval of subdivisions and individual site developments. During the application review process, the cityCity will evaluate the consistency of the proposal with the purposes of this chapter. Prior to the start of the design effort, it is recommended that the project design team members read the City’s Ggeneral Pplan and become familiar with its policies.

A. Site Design.

1. Design of building sites shouldshall be sensitive to the natural terrain. Structures shouldshall be located in a way that minimizes gradinggrading and preserves natural features (e.g., prominent knolls, ridgelines, etc.)

2. Preserve views of significant visual features,. as designated on the hillside overlay zone map, as seen from both within and outside a hillside development. When designing lots and plotting homes, the following provisions should be considered:

a. Dwellings should be oriented to allow view opportunities. even though views may be limited.

Residential privacy should not be unreasonably sacrificed; and

b. A significant public vista, skyline, open space corridor, or vertical open space corridor as seen from an interstate, an arterial, or a secondary street should be a major design element in the site planning process.

3. Where possible, graded areas should be designed with manufactured slopes located on the uphill side of structures.
332
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 47 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-10
EXHIBIT 2 - BUILDING PLACEMENT AT A SITE

4. To the extent possible,. the width of a building, measured in the direction of the slope, shouldshall be minimized in order to limit the amount of cutting and tilling and to better "fit" the house to the natural terrain. The degree of slope will dictate how this is accomplishedthe slope will dictate how this is accomplished and shall be demonstrated on the project plans (See Figure 16.24-11 Exhibit 3 – Building Placement at a Site.”
333
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 48 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-11
EXHIBIT 3 - BUILDING PLACEMENT AT A SITE

5. Clustering of development is encouraged. in hillside areas regardless of size. This is particularly important in environmentally sensitive areas in order to reduce the potential for tire hazard, erosion and excess runoff, and to preserve existing natural features and open space.

B. Driveways and Roadways.

1. Driveways that serve more than one parcel are encouraged as a method of reducing unnecessary grading grading, paving, and site disturbance.
334
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 49 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-12

ROADWAY PLACEMENT AT A SITE

335
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 50 of 65 ends

C. Architecture.

1. The form, mass, and profile of the individual buildings and architectural features shouldshall be designed to blend with the natural terrain and preserve the character and profile of the natural slope.

Techniques that should be consideredto accomplish this include:

a. Detaching the garage from the residence;: and

b. Integrating retaining walls into garage walls on sloping lots to reduce grading grading and minimize visibility of walls:; and

c. Including architectural enrichments and variations in roof massing. Roofs should have shall incorporate low profiles (for example 3:12 slope) to minimize their visual impact. On sloping land, the roof pitch shouldshall follow the slope of the hill-side hillside, instead of being perpendicular to the hillside or opposing hillside slopeslope. Care should be taken to avoid the use of gabled ends on downhill elevations. Gable ends shall not be used on downhill elevations. Upper stories shouldshall not be cantilevered out of the opposite direction of the hillside slope.

2. The design of the structure shouldshall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuildingbuilding scale and to minimize the blocking of views as demonstrated on the project plans. For example, within a development, the majority of the units should not be designed with minimum setback to minimum setback. See additional criteria as provided under Section 16.08.030 “Single-family Residential Design Standards and Design Features” and Section

16.08.040 “Multi-family Residential Design Standards”.

3. Large expanses of a single material on walls, roofs, or paving areas should be avoided. Create interesting, small scale patterns by breaking up building mass, varying building materials, and through design and placement of windows and doors. Building plans and elevations should be varied throughout a development to avoid a monotonous "cookie-cutter" look.

D. Walls and Fences.

1. Walls and fences can be used to define a sense of place and create an attractive appearance.

However, walls should not dominate a view, and their height should be limited adjacent to a street or trail or within a rear yard. Extensive landscaping should be used to reduce the visual impact of walls. In 336
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 51 of 65 ends

addition, street front walls should incorporate varying design and natural materials. The use of open view fencing is encouraged, so long as adequate public safety and residential privacy are maintained.

2. When possible, walls and fences shouldshall be designed as an integral part of the building in order to minimize the visual impact on surrounding areas.

3. Visually obtrusive solid fencing should be avoided in highly visible areas (unless required for sound attenuation), with the preference being for open (wrought iron) fencing.

E. Landscaping.

1. Street trees shouldshall be provided in select areas to enhance the natural character of the areas and to create a more rural appearance. Street tree species selection, and spacing of trees, shouldshall be sensitive to the context in which they are planted. Species selection shouldshall be considered to minimize potential impacts to infrastructure also be respectful of potential impact on infra-structure improvements (i.e. root damage to streets, sidewalks, etc.).

2. SlopesSlopes shouldshall be designed with informal clusters of trees and shrubs to soften and vary the slope planes, consistent with landformlandform gradinggrading concepts.

337
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 52 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-13

BUILDING ENVELOPE ON SLOPE

F. Grading.

There are three distinct types of gradinggrading proposed in these guidelines, each with a unique quality, and each with an individual and appropriate application as determined by the City Engineer or designee.

Larger sites will most likely incorporate all three concepts in various parts of the plan.

1. Minimal Grading. This is typically used for large lot single family homes, custom homes with variable foundations that conform to the existing slopesslopes, and other uses that utilize the least amount 338
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 53 of 65 ends

of gradinggrading in order to get the facility and structures built. This technique embraces the following concepts:

a. GradingGrading shouldshall be limited to individual flat graded pad areas for residential building sites. GradingGrading shouldshall be limited to only the required building areas and adjacent outdoor amenities in steep hillside areashillside areas;

b. Foundation systems that require little or no gradinggrading are encouraged, forcing the architecture to con-formconform to the land rather than the land to conform to the dwelling;:

c. Roadways, driveways, and individual building pads should be designed to conform with the contours and to attempt to daylight in the center of the road or building pad to ensure a minimum cut and fill situation; and
c. Cut and fill lines delineating the grading activity whereby cut areas adjoining next to fill areas shall be situated outside of areas where differential settlement is not desirable (e.g., roadways, building pads, driveways, etc.);

d. The balancing of gradinggrading is the concept to minimizes the amountvolume of cubic yards of earth excavated and filled.

2. Contour Grading. This concept results in post-development landforms that exhibit many of the characteristics present within natural landforms. ContourContour gradinggrading is typically used in situations where conventional, terraced, gradinggrading with benches and slopesslopes might be used but a "softened" gradinggrading look is desired. This would be desirable for areas that are limited in public view (i.e. concealed rear yards). Typically, contourcontour gradinggrading can reduce required cutcut and fillfill volumes as compared with traditional, terraced, gradinggrading. The design elements associated with this type of gradinggrading include: (See Figure 3-916.24-14 “Contour Grading”)

a. The use of horizontal and vertical curve variations for slope banks creating a curvilinear pattern;

b. Post-development landforms that exhibit natural terrain characteristics (without the heavy modeling effects of landformlandform gradinggrading);

c. A general rounding of slopesslopes at slopeslope intersections and transition zones with natural grade;

d. PadPad configurations that are curvilinear; and

e. SlopesSlopes that are designed with contourcontour gradinggrading techniques (e.g., the location of slopesslopes behind structure (not in side yards), slopesslopes in hidden locations, or slopesslopes less than ten feet in height).

FIGURE 3-9

CONTOUR GRADING
339
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 54 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-14

CONTOUR GRADING

FIGURE 3-10

LANDFORM GRADING
340
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 55 of 65 ends

FIGURE 16.24-15

LANDFORM GRADING

3. Landform Grading. Graded slopesslopes in this category will replicate the irregular shapes of natural slopesslopes. LandformLandform gradinggrading techniques shouldshall be used whenever slopesslopes are created that will be open to public view. This is particularly true for slopes that exceed ten feet in height.

The intent of these gradinggrading guidelines, is to incorporate the basic principles of the landformlandform gradinggrading concept as the preferred method in the design and construction of hillside development projects. so that they w ill be in harmony with the natural topography and reflect natural plant distribution patterns. (See Figure 3-1016.24-15 “Landform Grading”)

341
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 56 of 65 ends

LandformLandform gradinggrading techniques embraceshall incorporate the following concepts:

a. Land plans shouldshall flow with the natural topography rather than against it. This means that street pat-ternspatterns and building padpad configurations shall follow the underlying topographic features rather than cutting across them;:

b. Landform graded slopes are characterized by continuous series of concave and convex forms interspersed with mounds that blend into profiles with varying slope gradients and with significant transition zones between man-made and natural slopes;;

c. Pad configurations are irregular. Slope down-draindrainage devices either follow natural lines of the slopes or are tucked away in special Swale and berm combinations in order to conceal the drains from view. Exposed segments in visible areas are treated with natural rock for a more aesthetically pleasing appearance;

d. Theis technique shouldshall be used wherever possible to provide for a variety of both slope percentage, slope direction, and topographical detailing in a three-dimensional, undulating. pattern similar to existing terrain;: and

e. Manufactured cutcut and fillfill slopesslopes exceedingin excess of ten feet in height that will be either exposed to permanent public view or are adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas, shouldshall be designed with features characteristic ofof natural slopesslopes,. This design shall be implemented, where physically feasibleas determined by the City Engineer based on the project plans so that theirthe ultimate appearance will resemble a natural slope. This will includeis applicable to, but not limited to, slopesslopes along streets, and highways, adjacent to parks, schools, open spaces,. other public facilities, and other prominent and visible slopesslopes.

4. The following basic gradinggrading guidelines and techniques serve to implement preferred landformlandform grading techniques and help avoid unnecessary cutcut and fillfill:

a. CutsCuts. When grading into convex landforms (i.e., outward-projecting features), the resulting cuts shall maintain a similarly projecting form and be contoured to blend seamlessly with the undisturbed portions, thereby preserving a natural-appearing landform.When convex shaped natural features. (e.g., protruding minor landforms) are cut, the residual landform should not be a flat slope face, but rather should be restored to resemble the original. This will require more than just rounding at the edges but, in effect, reconfiguring it so the final result will give the appearance of a protruding ridgeline.

b. Use of variable slope ratiosslope ratios. Because Landform grading designs require the use of variable slope ratios at greater than 2:1 and may create valleys or concave indentations on building pad areas, they may result in loss of usable area. In addition, engineering and construction costs may increase.

Be-cause of this, segments of a cut or fill slope may be designed with variable slope ratios less than 2:1, but not less than 1.5: I within the following guidelines and subject to third party review at the applicant's expense: Because landform grading designs require the use of variable slope ratios, this may result in loss of usable area near building pads. Therefore, only cut slopes may be steeper than 2:1, but not steeper than

1.5:1 and shall meet the following guidelines:

1) A geotechnical engineer shall certify that slopesslopes will meet standard stability requirements;
2) A licensed landscape architect shall certify the plantability of the slopes, with an emphasis on the slopes steeper than 2:1; and
342
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 57 of 65 ends

32) The overall ratio from top to toe will be 2:1 or flatter; and

43) Ratios flatter than 2:1 will also be used in the slope design.

c. GradingGrading operations should be plannedshall occur to avoid the rainy season, October fifteenth (15th) to April fifteenth (I 5th15th). GradingGrading permits shall only be issued when a plan for erosion controlerosion and silt retentionsediment control has been approved by the cityCity without regard to time of year. Additionally, those projects also requiring a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall obtain approval of the SWPPP prior to any grading permit issuance.

d. A rRounded and smooth transitions should be madeshall occur where when the planes of man- made and natural slopesslopes intersect. Where cutcut or fillfill conditions are created, slopesslopes shouldshall be varied. rather than left at a constant angle or create an unnatural, rigid, `'engineered" appearance. The angle of a graded slopeslope shouldshall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain.

e. Manufactured slopesslopes adjacent to roadways shall be consistent with the landformlandform gradinggrading and revegetation techniques., where physically feasible to create visually interesting and pleasing streetscapes. The higher the slope becomes, the more important the modeling effect of landform grading becomes.

f. Top of slope berms shall be used to eliminate the possibility of drainage sheet flow over the slope that would potentially cause an unstable condition. Tops of slopes should be rounded in conformance with landform grading techniques, or increased in size to reduce the visual impact of the back of a home.

f. Slopes shall implement drainage measures as detailed within Sub-article 11 of the City of Murrieta Grading Manual.

G.G. Drainage.

1. Natural drainage courses shouldshall be preserved and enhanced to the extent possiblemaximum extent per the associated National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit associated with the project site. Rather than filling them in, drainage features should be incorporated as an integral part of the project design in order to enhance the overall quality and aesthetics of a site, to provide attractive open space vistas, and to preserve the natural character of the site. Encourage the use of natural drainage courses as natural boundaries between neighborhoods.

2. Storm drainage runoff resulting from project development should be minimized. Where possible, flood control plans for storm waters should encourage the detention of water for percolation in to the ground-water to conserve it for future uses and to mitigate downstream flooding.The NPDES Permit also requires that a project’s stormwater runoff be retained on-site through filtration to the maximum extent permitted by State law. Runoff not retained on-site shall be conveyed off-site in accordance with City standards, codes, and policies.

343
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 58 of 65 ends

16.24.080 Exceptions.

A. Residential Accessory Structures and Accessory Dwelling Units. This Chapter shall not apply to the development of residential accessory structures and accessory dwelling units on parcels with existing development approvals when the new construction:

1. Does not require the use of a retaining wall; and

2. Meets the criteria as described within Section 16.44.150 (Residential Accessory Uses and Structures) and Section 16.44.160 (Accessory Dwelling Units) and Section 16.02.020 (Exemptions from Land Use Permit Requirements).

344
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 59 of 65 ends

16.24.090 (Reserved).

Reserved for future updates

345
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 60 of 65 ends

16.24.100 Hillside Overlay Map.

A. Refer to the City’s online Geographic Information System (GIS) as an additional mapping resource for project review.

346
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 61 of 65 ends

SECTION 11. Section 16.28.080 (Landscaping Standards) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“16.28.080 Landscape Standards.

Landscape areas and materials shall be designed, installed, and maintained in compliance with the following:

A. General Design Standards. The following features shall be incorporated into the design of the proposed landscape and shown on required landscape plans:

1. Landscaping shall be planned as an integral part of the overall project design and not simply located in excess space after parking areas and structures have been planned;

2. Pedestrian access to sidewalks and structures shall be considered in the design of all landscaped areas;

3. Landscape planting shall be provided for all adjacent public rights-of-way, in compliance with Chapter 16.108 (Improvements);

4. With the exception of single-family residential units, landscape adjacent to driveways and parking areas shall be protected from vehicle damage through the provision of minimum six (6) inch high concrete curbs or other types of barriers as approved by the director;

5. Landscaped areas shall not be less than five (5) feet in width, except where determined by the director;

6. Concrete strips, a minimum of four (4) inches in width, shall be provided to separate all turf areas from other landscaped areas, except for single-family residential landscape projects;

7. Permeable surfaces shall be used wherever permissible in place of impervious paving, to encourage on-site water infiltration and support water conservation measures. Permeable surfaces shall be identified on plans; and

8. Protective tree grates shall be provided for trees planted in pedestrian areas, except for single-family residential landscape projects and as determined by the director.

B. Plant Materials. Plant materials shall be selected and installed to comply with the following requirements:

1. A mix of plant materials shall be provided in compliance with the following table (Table 3-516.28- 2). Calculations documenting the required mix shall be shown on the landscape plan;

Table 3-5TABLE 16.28-2

MINIMUM REQUIRED MIX OF PLANT MATERIALS
Plant Material Minimum Required Percentage
Trees
Twenty-four (24) inch box 35%*
Fifteen- (15) -gallon 65%
Shrubs
347
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 62 of 65 ends

Five- (5-) gallon 70%
One- (1-) gallon (herbaceous only) with city
approval
30%
Groundcover
Coverage within two (2) years 100%
A greater percentage of specimen trees may be utilized with a corresponding reduction in the number of fifteen- (15-) gallon trees subject to the review of the director.

2. Trees for shade shall be provided for buildings/structures, as well as for parking lots and open space areas. These trees can be deciduous or evergreen and are to be incorporated to provide natural cooling opportunities for the purpose of energy and water conservation;

3. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures, at an equivalent of at least one (1) tree per thirty (30) linear feet of structure. Other areas shall provide trees at a ratio of one (1) tree for each three hundred (300) square feet of landscaped area. The clustering of trees is encouraged;

4. Mature specimen trees in thirty-six (36) inch and forty-eight (48) inch boxes shall be provided for large projects in sufficient quantity subject to the approval of the Director, to provide variety and emphasis at main focal areas;

5. All trees shall be staked or guyed (on a case-by-case basis) subject to the review of the director and in compliance with city standards;

6. Trees and shrubs shall be planted so that at maturity they do not interfere with service lines and traffic safety sight areas;

7. Trees and shrubs shall be planted and maintained in a manner that protects the basic rights of adjacent property owners, particularly the right to solar access;

8. Trees planted near public sidewalks or curbs shall be of a species and installed in a manner that prevents physical damage to sidewalks, curbs, gutters and other public improvements; and

9. Groundcover shall be of live plant material. Limited quantities of gravel, colored rock, bark, and similar materials may be used in combination with a living groundcover.”

348
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 63 of 65 ends

SECTION 12. This ordinance was previously reviewed for consistency with the Citywide Comprehensive Development Code in 1998. The standards were originally evaluated and implemented pursuant to the Negative Declaration adopted for implementation of the Comprehensive Development Code on October 28, 1997. Furthermore, the proposed updates have been evaluated for consistency with the current project proposal in consideration of the previously adopted Negative Declaration and the Murrieta General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Subsequent Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) certified by the City of Murrieta in 2021 (SCH No. 2010111084) in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 21166 and California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA) Guidelines Section 15162. Based on this evaluation, staff determined that the proposed updates would not result in new significant environmental impacts, a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts , or changed circumstances that would require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental environmental document. Accordingly, the previously adopted environmental documents adequately address the proposed modifications.

SECTION 13. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance.

The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 14. This Ordinance shall become effective on the thirty-first (31st) day after its passage and adoption, and within fifteen (15) days after its final passage and the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted and published in a newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in the City in the manner required by law and shall cause a copy of this Ordinance and its certification, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the City.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this ___ day of ________, 202__.

Jon Levell, Mayor

ATTEST:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

349
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 64 of 65 ends

Tiffany J. Israel, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )§

CITY OF MURRIETA )

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 26-_____ was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Murrieta at the regular meeting thereof, held on the ___th day of _______, 202__, and was signed by the Mayor of the said City, and that the same was passed and adopted by the following
vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

I, Cristal McDonald, City Clerk of the City of Murrieta, California further certify that Ordinance No. 26-____ was duly published according to law and the order of the City Council of said City and the same was so published in Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation on the following date(s):

Adopted Ordinance: , 2026.

In witness whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name this __ day of ______________, 2026.

Cristal McDonald, City Clerk

350
Ordinance No. 26-___

Page 65 of 65 ends

351
SP 15
SP
276SP 8SP 215
SP 20SP 9
SP 309
SP 10
SP 2
SP 5
SP 1
SP 310
SP 4
SP
21 SP 15
SP
276SP 8SP 215
SP 20SP 9
SP 309
SP 10
SP 2
SP 5
SP 1
SP 310
SP 4
SP
21 C L I N T
O

N K E I T H R D
N
U
T
M
E
G
S
T
J
E
F
F
E
R
S
O
N
A
V
E
L
O
S
A
L
A
M
O
S
R
D
W
I
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
R
D
215
15 LAKE

ELSINORE

MENIFEE

TEMECULA

WILDOMAR
City of Murrieta
Hillside Area Overlay Map
±
0 1 20.5
Miles
SP 1 - Murrieta
Highlands
SP 2 - Greer Ranch
SP 4 - Murrieta Hills
SP 5 - Golden City
SP 8 - Downtown
Murrieta
SP 9 - Copper Canyon
SP 10 - Murrieta Oaks
SP 15 - Creekside
Village
SP 20 - Santa Rosa
Highlands
SP 21 - Adobe Springs
SP 215 - Vineyard
SP 276 - The Triangle
SP 309 - Murrieta
Springs
SP 310
Hillside Area
City Boundary
Please Note: For properties
located within a Specific Plan,
please consult the subject
Specific Plan as it relates to
applicable Hillside Development
regulations and implementation
requirements.
352

353

354

355

356
357
358

CITY OF MURRIETA

April 24, 2026

Environmental Review Update Checklist Form
For Projects with Previously Approved Environmental Documents

FOR PURPOSES OF CONSIDERATION OF
Development Code Amendment No. DCA-2021-2396

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15164 set forth the criteria for determining the appropriate additional environmental documentation , if any, to be completed when there is a previously adopted Negative Declaration (ND) or a previously certified environmental impact report ( PEIR) covering the project for which a subsequent discretionary action is required. This Environmental Review Update Checklist Form has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) to explain the rationale for determining whether any additional environmental documentation is needed for the subject discretionary action.

1. Original project and background on the previously adopted ND and certified General Plan EIR:

The original “Project” was adoption of the citywide Comprehensive Development Code in 1998. These standards were originally evaluated and implemented under the adopted Negative Declaration for implementation of the Comprehensive Development Code on October 28, 1997. These updates have been evaluated for consistency for the current “Project” proposal utilizing this Negative Declaration and the Murrieta General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Subsequent SEIR in 2021 (SCH No. 2010111084), by the City of Murrieta.

The City Council adopted a General Plan in 1994 following incorporation in 1991. At that time, it was determined that all development decisions were to continue to utilize Riverside County’s Ordinance No. 348 (Zoning) until such a time that the City adopted its own Development Code, provided that the County’s Ordinance No. 348 was not in conflict with the General Plan.

In August 1996, the City Council approved a contract with a design consultant to assist with the development of the initial Murrieta Development Code (MDC). In September 1997, the City began the process for adoption after holding several joint Planning Commission and City Council public workshops to receive public input and to develop standards. In early 1998, the City implemented these new standards replaci ng County Ordinance No. 348. Inclusive of these new standards were parameters covering Hillside Development.

Following this period, in August 1996, the City Council approved a contract with a design consultant to assist with the development of the MDC. In September 1997, the City began the process for adoption.

This was inclusive of holding several joint Planning Commission and City Council public workshops to receive public input and to develop standards. In early 1998, the City implemented these new standards. Inclusive of these standards were parameters covering Hillside Development as described under MDC Chapter 16.24 (Hillside Development).
359
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 2 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

NEGATIVE DECLARATION

As described under the project description within the ND, the objective of the updates was: ..To establish comprehensive standards and straightforward processes for development within the City of Murrieta. The Development Code is an implementing document of the General Plan which will govern zoning and subdivision regulations citywide. It will expa nd the zoning districts established in the General Plan and propose allowable uses within each zoning district. The document includes, but is not limited to site planning and general development standards for landscaping, noise, parking, signs, and tree pr eservation. The new Comprehensive Development Code will replace Ordinance 348 (Zoning) and Ordinance No. 460 (Subdivisions) in addition to other land use -related ordinances. The implementing document will not cause the physical construction of any new stru ctures or the subdivision of land rather it establishes standards and requirements for the processing of applications consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City’s General Plan.1

GENERAL PLAN 2035 FEIR (2011)

In 2011, the City processed a needed General Plan Update to address a wide variety of Planning issues including development in hillside areas . T he General Plan 2035 F EIR identified significant impacts on the environment that could not be avoided or mitigated to a level of insignificance. Due to this, in 2011, the City Council adopted a statement of overriding considerations when the General Plan EIR was certified that justified why the merits of the General Plan update outweighed the unavoidable significant impacts. These four areas included:

Land Use

• Consistency with the Riverside County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

Traffic and Circulation

• Roadway Segments (Project and Cumulative Impacts). Even with the installation of the recommended improvements, implementation of the proposed General Plan 2035 would result in unacceptable levels of service on the roadway segments shown as LOS D in green, LOS E in yellow, and LOS F in red on Exhibit 5.4-14. The results of these impacts were determined to be significant unavoidable impacts for the roadway segments shown as LOS D, LOS E, and LOS F on Exhibit 5.4-14 of that document.

• Intersections (Project and Cumulative Impacts). The following 16 intersections were projected to operate at levels of service that d id not meet the City’s standards, thus result ing in a significant unavoidable significant impact.

Intersection 1: Menifee Road / Scott Road Intersection 3: Winchester Road – SR-79 / Scott Road Intersection 4: Antelope Road / Keller Road
Intersection 9: Antelope Road / Golden City Drive – Baxter Road Intersection 10: Whitewood – Meadowlark / Golden City Drive – Baxter Road Intersection 18:

California Oaks Road / Clinton Keith Road
360
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 3 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

Intersection 20: I -215 NB Off -Ramp / Clinton Keith Road Intersection 22: Meadowlark – Whitewood Road / Clinton Keith Road
Intersection 25: Winchester Road – SR-79 / Clinton Keith Road – Benton Road Intersection 28:

Jefferson Avenue / Murrieta Hot Springs Road
Intersection 44: Jefferson Avenue / Kalmia Street
Intersection 52: Winchester Road (SR -79) / Murrieta Hot Springs Road Intersection 53:

Hancock Avenue / Los Alamos Road
Intersection 54: I -215 SB Ramps / Los Alamos Road Intersection 57: Whitewood Road / Murrieta Hot Springs Road Intersection 59: Nutmeg Street / Clinton Keith Road

Air Quality

• Short-Term Construction Emissions
• Long-Term Mobile and Stationary Source Emissions
• Cumulative Short-Term Construction Emissions Impacts
• Cumulative Long-Term Mobile and Stationary Source Emissions

Noise

• Cumulative Long-Term Operational Noise Impacts

Parks and Recreational Facilities

• Parks and Recreational Facilities – Project and Cumulative Impacts2

GENERAL PLAN 2035 SEIR (2020)

In 2020, the City prepared a Supplemental Environmen tal Impact Report (SEIR) to the General Plan 2035. It was needed at that time to analyze planning-related issues and to comply with updated Elements and related Policies/Goals. The SEIR analyzed only those subject areas for which there were changes in circumstances, or new information result ing in potentially greater impacts than those identified in the 2011 General Plan 2035 FEIR.

Section 4.0, Environmental Analysis, of that document, provides a description of these potential environmental impacts and recommended General Plan policies, implementation measures, and mitigation measures to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. After implementation of the recommended policies, implementation measures, and mitigation measures, it was determined that most of the potentially significant impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels. However, it was determined that the following new impacts could not be feasibly mitigated :

Traffic and Circulation

Roadway Segments (Project and Cumulative Impacts). Even with the installation of the recommended improvements, implementation of the proposed Project would result in an unacceptable level of service on the following roadway segments:

361
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 4 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

• Clinton Keith Road east of California Oaks Road (new deficiency) • California Oaks Road south of Clinton Keith Road (new deficiency) • Jefferson Avenue south of California Oaks Road (new deficiency) • Los Alamos Road between Monroe Avenue and Hancock Avenue (deficient in “without project”) • Murrieta Hot Springs Road between I-15 and I-215 (deficient in “without project”) • Murrieta Hot Springs Road between Alta Murrieta Drive and Whitewood Road (deficient in “without project”)
• Murrieta Hot Springs Road between Whitewood Road and Margarita Road (deficient in “without project”).

Intersections (Project and Cumulative Impacts). The following 5 intersections would result in unavoidable traffic impacts, and thus result in an unavoidable significant impact.

• Jefferson Avenue/Kalmia Street
• Winchester Road (SR‐79)/Murrieta Hot Springs Road
• Hancock Avenue/Los Alamos Road
• Whitewood Road/Murrieta Hot Springs Road
• Whitewood Road/Clinton Keith Road

Air Quality

• Short-Term Construction Emissions
• Long-Term Mobile and Stationary Source Emissions
• Cumulative Short-Term Construction Emissions Impacts
• Cumulative Long-Term Mobile and Stationary Source Emissions

The SEIR (SCH No. 2010111084), including the 2011 General Plan EIR (the “General Plan EIR”), identified potentially significant environmental effects, some of which could feasibly be mitigated or avoided. Such effects and corresponding mitigation measures, goals, and policies, are identified in the General Plan 2035 EIR (2011), and are incorporated by reference within that document. The General Plan EIR determined that all significant environmental effects, with the exception of four discussed above, can feasibly be avoided, have been avoided, or reduced to a level of insignificance. 3 The mitigation measures and monitoring program (MMRP) are listed collectively known as the General Plan EIR for the purposes of this review.

CONCLUSION

The scope of the Project (2026) is to clarify and correct existing hillside review protocols and minor modifications consistent with existing baseline standards. Furthermore, implementing these standards in an objective manner consistent with recent State housing legislation requirements. It should be noted that individual projects are still subject to subsequent environmental review and site-specific analysis for consistency with CEQA . Lastly, the City General Plan MMRP’s are reviewed for applicability and are carried forward on an individual project-level basis.

Pursuant CEQA Guidelines section 15164(b), the City of Murrieta, as the lead agency for this project, the proposed text amendment for hillside development, has determined that a 15162 Consistency 362
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 5 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

Analysis to the approved Negative Declaration and adopted General Plan EIR are appropriate, as only minor technical changes or additions are necessary and n one of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 requiring the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.

Based upon a review of the current project, none of the situations described in Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines apply. No changes in circumstances have occurred, and no new information of substantial importance has manifested, which w ould result in new significant or substantially increased adverse impacts as a result of the Project.

2. Lead agency name and address:

City of Murrieta
Development Services Department, Planning Division
1 Town Square
Murrieta, CA 92562
(951) 461-6061

a. Contact: Chris Tracy, AICP Senior Planner
b. Phone number: (951) 461-6046
c. E-mail: [email protected]

3. Project applicant’s name and address:

City of Murrieta
Development Services Department, Planning Division
1 Town Square
Murrieta, CA 92562

a. Contact: Chris Tracy, AICP Senior Planner
b. Phone number: (951) 461-6046
c. E-mail: [email protected]

4. Summary of the activities authorized by present permit/entitlement application(s):

The MDC is the primary instrument for implementing the City’s General Plan. It provides the City’s regulations for the development and use of property within the City limits, and provides information on zoning, subdivisions, and other related land use activities. Inclusive of these standards are parameters covering Hillside Development, specifically under MDC Chapter 16.24 (Hillside Development).

5. Does the project for which a subsequent discretionary action is now proposed differ in any way from the previously approved project?

YES NO

If yes, describe ALL differences.

363
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 6 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

6. SUBJECT AREAS DETERMINED TO HAVE NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE

SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS COMPARED TO THOSE IDENTIFIED IN THE PREVIOUS ND OR PEIR. The subject areas checked below were determined to be new significant environmental effects or to be previously identified effects that have a substantial increase in severity either due to a change in project, change in circumstances or new information of substantial importance, as indicated by the checklist and discussion on the following pages.

NONE

Aesthetics Agr. & Forestry Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology & Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
Hydrology & Water Quality
Land Use & Planning Mineral Resources Noise
Population & Housing
Transportation/Traffic

Public Services
Tribal Cultural Resources

Recreation
Utilities & Service Systems

364
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 7 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this analysis, the Department of Development Services has determined that:

No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefo re, the previousl y adopted ND and previously certified EIR (FEIR & SEIR) are adequate.

No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, because the project is a residential project in conformance with, and pursuant to, a Specific Plan with a EIR completed after January 1, 1980, the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182.

Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous ND due to the involvement of significant new environmental ef fects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). However, all new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in severity of previously identified significant effects are clearly avoidable through the incorporation of mitigation measures agreed to by the project applicant . Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT ND is required.

Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous ND or PEIR due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT or SUPPLEMENTAL PEIR is required.

Chris Tracy

4/24/2026
Signature Date

Chris Tracy, AICP

Senior Planner
Printed Name Title

365
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 8 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

INTRODUCTION

CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15164 set forth the criteria for determining the appropriate additional environmental documentation, if any, to be completed when there is a previously adopted ND or a previously certified EIR for the project.

CEQA Guidelines, Section 15162(a) and 15163 state that when an ND has been adopted or an EIR certified for a project, no Subsequent or Supplemental EIR or Subsequent Negative Declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole public record, one or more of the following:

1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; or
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previously adopted Negative Declaration or previously certified EIR; or c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Negative Declaration or EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

CEQA Guidelines, Section 15164(a) states that an Addendum to a previously certified EIR may be prepared if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental PEIR have occurred.

CEQA Guidelines, Section 15164(b) states that an Addendum to a previously adopted Negative Declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary.

If the factors listed in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15163, or 15164 have not occurred or are not met, no changes to the previously certified EIR or previously adopted ND are necessary.

366
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 9 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

The following responses detail any changes in the project, changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken and/or "new information of substantial importance" that may cause one or more effects to environmental resources. The responses support the “Determination,” above, as to the type of environmental documentation required, if any.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UPDATE CHECKLIST

I. AESTHETICS – Since the previous ND was adopted and certification of the EIR occurred, are there any changes in the project, changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken and/or "new information of substantial importance" that cause one or more effects to aesthetic resources including: (a) the obstruction of views from a scenic vista ; (b) damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway, (c) degrade the existing visual character of the site and surroundings, or (d) generation of light or glare?

YES NO

Comprehensive Development Code Negative Declaration, General Plan EIR, and Proposed Project

Negative Declaration

Impacts on Aesthetics as provided within Comprehensive Development Code Negative Declaration for this issue area were determined to have “Less than Significant Impact” with respect to affecting a scenic vista or scenic highway, having a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect, or creating a source for light or glare.

As noted within the ND with respect to Aesthetic Resources : ..The document establishes standards for development of residential, commercial, industrial, and special purpose zones in addition to providing buffers between potentially conflicting uses such as between equestrian/agricultural and industrial uses.

The document regulates the following uses in conformance with the General Plan and applicable local, state and federal laws. These include, but are not limited to: affordable housing, air quality, geologic/seismic hazards, hazardous materials storage, hillside dev elopment, infrastructure mitigation, landscaping, lighting on project sites and for the regional benefit of Mount Palomar, noise, nonconforming structures, parking and loading of vehicles, signage, solid waste/recycling, transportation demand management, tree preservation, and vibrations. The Development Code defines the administrative processes necessary for development within the City. (Comprehensive Dev. Code, IS-11)1

Since the adoption of the ND in 1997; there have not been any significant modifications to the City’s Hillside standards and more specifically aesthetic resources . These resources can be valued based on their uniqueness, prominence, quality, and relationship to community identity. Visual resources are important from an aesthetic perspective when they are identified as containing a significant scenic value. Within this understanding, a scenic vista can be defined as the public view of an area that is visually or aesthetically unique, such as a valley or a mountain range. A substantial adverse effect on visual resources could result in situations in which a development project introduces physical features that are not characteristic of current development, obstructs an identified public scenic vista, impairs views from other public areas, or has a substantial change to the natural landscape. The proposed code amendment simply modifies and clarifies existing planning and engineering standards to support future development within designated Hillside areas and throughout the City. Individual development p rojects would still be subject to 367
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 10 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

environmental review under CEQA with site-specific analysis with visual analysis, comply with maximum building heights, the City’s development review process, and would be required to demonstrate consistency with General Plan policies and compliance with City’s Municipal Code development standards.

Provided this background, the proposed code amendment would not result in a significant adverse effect on a scenic vista.

There are no roadways within the City that are considered eligible for official designation as a County or State Scenic Highway . The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) designates official and eligible scenic highways. There are no designated or proposed state scenic highways within the vicinity of the project site that would be impacted by the proposed code amendments. The nearest highway to the City limits with a designation is Interstate (I) 215, which has an eligible state scenic highway for a three- mile portion north of the City limits but is not listed as a designated scenic highway. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in an impact related to scenic resources within a state scenic highway.

General Plan 2035 FEIR (2011)

The General Plan 2035 FEIR analyzed this issue area under Aesthetics:

..IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD HAVE AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON A SCENIC VISTA.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

..In general, future development under the proposed General Plan 2035 would be sub ject to compliance with the regulations, guidelines, and development review process set forth in the MDC, as well as the proposed General Plan 2035 goals and policies. These regulations and guidelines are intended to diminish conflicts between urban develo pment and visual resources, and preserve hills and ridges. Where permitted, development on hillsides within the City would involve careful siting, grading, and design in order to minimize exposure and preserve the City’s vistas. Additionally, due to the conceptual nature of the future development, proposals would require individual assessments of potential project -specific impacts to scenic vistas. If necessary, mitigation would be recommended to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. Therefore, future development according to the proposed General Plan 2035 is not anticipated to significantly impact the City’s scenic vistas; thus impacts are considered less than significant in this regard.

LAND USE ELEMENT

Goal LU-1 A complementary balance of land uses througho ut the community that meets the needs of existing residents and businesses as well as anticipated growth, and achieves the community’s vision.

Policies

LU-1.4 Provide for the development of complementary land uses, such as open space, recreation, civic, and service uses for all future residential and non-residential development.

CONSERVATION ELEMENT
368
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 11 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

Goal CSV-5 Hills and ridges are protected for their environmental and aesthetic values.

Policies

CSV-5.1 Promote compliance with hillside development standards and guidelines to maintain the natural character and the environmental and aesthetic values of sloped areas.

CSV-5.2 Incorporate significant landform features into City parks and open space, where appropriate.

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Goal ROS-7 Open space areas are planned to protect, conserve, and utilize resources of unique character and value for the community.

Policies

ROS-7.1 Preserve and enhance open space resources in Murrieta.

ROS-7.2 Designate open space to preserve habitat and scenic views of natural areas.

ROS-7.3 Seek opportunities to designate open space along waterways, while also providing for the development of trails.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures beyond the goals and policies identified in the proposed General Plan 2035 are required.

Goals and Policies in the Proposed General Plan 2035:

..LAND USE ELEMENT

Goal LU-1 A complementary balance of land uses throughout the community that meets the needs of existing residents and businesses as well as anticipated growth, and achieves the community’s vision.

Policies

LU-1.4 Provide for the development of complementary land uses, such as open space, recreation, civic, and service uses for all future residential and non-residential development.

CONSERVATION ELEMENT

Goal CSV-5 Hills and ridges are protected for their environmental and aesthetic values.

Policies

CSV-5.1 Promote compliance with hillside development standards and guidelines to maintain the natural character and the environmental and aesthetic values of sloped areas. 369
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 12 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

CSV-5.2 Incorporate significant landform features into City parks and open space, where appropriate.

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Goal ROS-7 Open space areas are planned to protect, conserve, and utilize resources of unique character and value for the community.

Policies

ROS-7.1 Preserve and enhance open space resources in Murrieta.

ROS-7.2 Designate open space to preserve habitat and scenic views of natural areas.

ROS-7.3 Seek opportunities to designate open space along waterways, while also providing for the development of trails.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.3 -15 through Page 5.3-18)2

Impacts to Scenic Vistas would be reduced to below a level of significance with the implementation of the above General Plan Goals and Policies as reviewed on a project -level basis. To achieve this it would involve careful siting and hillside grading techniques to minimize exposure and preserve vistas. Also, due to the unknown nature of the future development in hillside areas, future projects would require individual assessments of potential impacts to scenic vistas and assess opportunities for preservation of open spaces in hillside areas. If necessary, mitigation would be recommended to reduce the potential effects to a less than significant level.

..IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD SUBSTANTIALLY DAMAGE SCENIC RESOURCES WITHIN A STATE SCENIC HIGHWAY.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

..Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable.

..CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD TEMPORARILY DEGRADE

THE VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE RESPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT SITE AND/OR ITS IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Potentially Significant Impact.

..Mitigation Measures:

370
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 13 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

AES-1 For future development located in or immediately adjacent to residentially zoned properties, construction documents shall include language that requires all construction contractors to strictly control the staging of construction equipment and the cleanlin ess of construction equipment stored or driven beyond the limits of the construction work area. Construction equipment shall be parked and staged within the project site, as distant from the residential use, as reasonably possible. Staging areas shall be s creened from view from residential properties.

AES-2 Construction documents shall include language requiring that construction vehicles be kept clean and free of mud and dust prior to leaving the development site. Streets surrounding the development site shall be swept daily and maintained free of dirt and debris.

AES-3 Construction worker parking may be located off -site with prior approval by the City. On - street parking of construction worker vehicles on residential streets shall be prohibited.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR,

Page 5 ends

Impacts from Construction-related visual impacts would be short-term and temporary. With implementation of project -screening techniques, a site would partially relieve the visual distractions encoun tered. To reduce this issue area to below of level of significance for development in hillside areas, Mitigation Measures AES-1, AES-2, and AES-3 would be evaluated for applicability and carried forward on a project- level basis.

..FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD PERMANENTLY DEGRADE THE VISUAL CHARACTER OF THE RESPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT SITE AND ITS IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

..Goals and Policies in the Proposed General Plan 2035:

LAND USE ELEMENT

Goal LU-2 A community that preserves its rural characteristics in appropriate locations.

Policies LU-2.1 Provide for the keeping of horses and other livestock, as well as farming or agricultural operations, on appropriate larger lot residential property to preserve the community’s heritage.

Goal LU-3 Stable, well-maintained residential neighborhoods in Murrieta.

Policies

LU-3.1 Maintain and enhance the character of single-family residential neighborhoods.

LU-3.2 Protect residential areas from the effects of potentially incompatible uses. Where new commercial or industrial development is allowed adjacent to residentially zoned districts, establish and/or maintain 371
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 14 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

standards for circulation, noise, setbacks, buffer areas, landscaping and architecture, which ensure compatibility between the uses.

LU-3.3 Assure that the type and intensity of land use shall be consistent with that of the immediate neighborhood.

LU-3.4 Strive to provide a diverse mix of housing types, along with uniformly high standards of residential property maintenance to preserve residents’ real estate values and their high quality of life.

LU-3.5 Prohibit uses that lead to deterioration of residential neighborhoods, or adversely impact the safety or the residential character of a residential neighborhood.

Goal LU -9 Land use patterns and urban design that support healthy and sustainable lifestyles and businesses.

Policies

LU-9.1 Encourage human-scale urban design on the neighborhood, block, and building scale.

Goal LU -10 A community that provides pedestrian -friendly environments for residential, commercial, business, and recreation uses.

Policies

LU-10.1 Prepare and use design guidelines to encourage hi gh-quality, pedestrian-oriented design that enhances the public realm.

LU-10.2 Consider preparation and adoption of a St reet Master Plan that addresses walkability and streetscape.

LU-10.5 Update the Development Code to create walkabil ity, and interesting and varied pedestrian environments.

LU-10.7 Encourage well-designed covered or structured parking instead of surface parking lots

LU-10.8 Encourage new surface off -street parking to be l ocated behind or to the side of buildings, as appropriate.

LU-10.9 Encourage ground -floor structured parking to be buffered from the pedestrian environment through strategies such as wrapping the structure with active retail uses, placing entrances off the street, and screening with landscaping or art.

Goal LU-11 A community that is comprehensively designed to create a positive and distinctive City image by protecting historic resources, and by strengthening the positive qualities of the City’s overall image and neighborhood identity.

Policies
372
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 15 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

LU-11.1 Study and determine areas in the City where rural character can be created, enhanced, or preserved.

LU-11.2 Endeavor to establish distinctive themes and character for individual focus areas or other areas, as appropriate, within the community.

LU-11.3 Enhance the positive qualities that give residential, commercial, and industrial areas their unique identities, while also allowing flexibility for innovative design.

LU-11.4 Preserve the unique character and integrity of the City's traditional residential neighborhoods.

LU-11.5 Improve the appearance and function of regi onal commercial centers through improved site design, landscaping, and architectural integrity.

LU-11.6 Seek to create unique retail spaces that are a rchitecturally rich, pedestrian friendly, culturally sensitive, and economically viable.

LU-11.7 Prepare and implement design guidelines for special districts or areas with unique character in the City of Murrieta, as appropriate.

LU-11.8 Develop a design palette for multiple-family and mixed use buildings.

Goal LU -12 Effective use of redevelopment as a to ol for economic development and community improvement.

Policies

LU-12.1 Continue to prioritize commercial, industrial, and re sidential revitalization within the redevelopment project area.

LU-12.2 Revitalize private and public lands in need of redevelopment or those that are underdeveloped due to lack of public facilities and revitalization.

LU-12.3 Provide yearly review of the City’s redevelopme nt program under the California Community Redevelopment Law to coordinate and pursue community improvement and revitalization activities.

LU-12.4 Ensure conditions of blight are evaluated, as need ed, to ensure the Redevelopment Plan is reflective of community needs.

Goal LU-20 West of Warm Springs Creek, preserve the hist oric rural character of the Los Alamos Hills area by maintaining its unique environment rural style with low density development and small rural roads while preserving natural features.

Policies

LU-20.1 Maintain the existing 2.5-acre minimum residential parcel size west of Warm Springs Creek. 373
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 16 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

LU-20.2 Establish development standards for all new construction to ensure high quality rural development in the area west of Warm Springs Creek.

LU-20.3 Establish unifying visual elements, such as split rail fencing, mature native trees, and well-spaced homes, as a means of distinguishing the Los Alamos Hills area as a rural historic enclave within Murrieta for the area west of Warm Springs Road.

LU-20.4 Encourage the construction of homes and accessory structures, west of Warm Springs Creek that are compatible with surrounding residential uses and the rural character of the Los Alamos Hills area.

LU-20.7 Allow commercial farms, tree crops and other agricultural uses on lots of at least 2.5 acres in size consistent with Los Alamos’ long history as an agricultural community.

LU-20.8 Allow for the creation of entry monuments that are rural in ch aracter to announce the arrival into the Los Alamos Hills area.

LU-20.9 Discourage features such as small lots, conventional sidewalks, or conventional street lights, west of Warm Springs Creek.

Goal LU-21 Appropriate land use transitions between rural lan d uses west of Warm Springs Creek and more intense land uses east of Warm Springs Creek.

Policies

LU-21.1 Consider the creation of a transitional density/intensi ty non-rural area to serve as a buffer area between the developments along Winchester Road and the rural residential land uses to the west of Warm Springs Creek.

Goal LU-22 Natural and visual resources are valued resources to maintain the rural character of the Los Alamos Hills.

Policies

LU-22.1 Encourage the preservation of natural and visual resources within Los Alamos Hills, such as rock outcroppings and scenic views of the local hills and valleys, to the greatest degree practicable.

LU-22.2 Encourage new construction and landscape design that utilizes grading techniques to mimic the natural terrain.

LU-22.3 Encourage development that minimizes impacts to existing water courses, mature trees, and natural features as much as poss ible. In those cases that these areas/features are impacted, the final design should provide adequate mitigation on-site and/or in nearby areas.

LU-22.4 Encourage healthy and structurally sound, existing groves of eucalyptus and other mature non- native trees located west of Warm Springs Creek to be considered a visual asset to the area, and should be conserved and maintained to the maximum degree practicable. 374
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 17 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

LU-22.5 Encourage new development to replace or supplement with native tree species as opportunities arise.

Goal LU-24 Historic Murrieta as the City’s cultural, civic and community center.

Policies

LU-24.1 Preserve and enhance the historic Murrieta area a s the governmental and cultural focal point of the City.

Goal LU-27 The quality and character of the City is preserved and enhanced by compliance with relevant codes and regulations.

Policies

LU-27.1 Review the Development Code and determine which sections are outdated to meet current trends, regulations, adopted community visions, and the General Plan 2035 land use designations, and revise as necessary.

CONSERVATION ELEMENT

Goal CSV-4 Restoration of the natural function and aesthetic value of creeks, while providing flood control measures and opportunities for recreation.

Policies

CSV-4.1 Prioritize creek preservation, restoration and/or mitigation banking along creeks as mitigation for environmental impacts.

CSV-4.2 Consider alternatives to hardlined bottoms and s ide slopes within flood control facilities, where technically feasible.

CSV-4.3 Preserve Warm Springs Creek and Cole Creek as a wildlife corridor, while accommodating flood control measures and passive recreation.

CSV-4.4 Retain and restore natural drainage courses and their function where health and safety are not jeopardized.

CSV-4.5 Support efforts for restoration, flood control, and recreation along Murrieta Creek, in coordination with regional and federal plans.

CSV-4.6 Seek funds and provide support for creek restoration, maintenance and protection through grant and mitigation programs, development entitlements, and non-profit organizations.

CSV-4.7 Continue to support the architectural enhancement of bridges over creeks as a scenic resource.

375
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 18 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

Goal CSV-5 Hills and ridges are protected for their environmental and aesthetic values.

Policies

CSV-5.1 Promote compliance with hillside development standards and guidelines to maintain the natural character and the environmental and aesthetic values of sloped areas.

CSV-5.2 Incorporate significant landform features into City parks and open space, where appropriate.

CSV-5.3 Maintain a register of cultural resources that includes landforms with cultural significance.

Goal CSV-9 A community that promotes the growth of an u rban forest and water -efficient landscaping, recognizing that plants provide natural services such as habitat, storm water management, soil retention, air filtration, and cooling, and also have aesthetic and economic value.

Policies

CSV-9.1 Identify and protect native trees, trees of histori c or cultural significance, and mature trees, consistent with the Tree Preservation Ordinance.

CSV-9.2 Consider the establishment of street tree standard s and a program for street tree planting, maintenance, and replacement.

CSV-9.3 Promote the use of street trees as a buffer between pedestrians and motorized traffic.

CSV-9.4 Encourage the planting of street trees in linear plant ing beds rather than tree wells in order to support long-living healthy trees. (formerly hc 9.3)

CSV-9.5 Encourage the planting of trees in private yards and properties.

CSV-9.6 Maintain a guide to preferred trees, shrubs, and ground cover pl ants of noninvasive species, or refer private parties to an existing guide that meets City needs to assist private landscaping efforts.

CSV-9.8 Encourage any new landscaped areas requiring permits to respect and incorporate the distinctive elements of the existing com munity landscape, including the retention of existing trees, to the maximum extent feasible.

CSV-9.9 Promote the use of native plant species in public landscaping of parks, schools, medians and planter strips, as well as in private development throughout the City.

RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

Goal ROS-7 Open space areas are planned to protect, conserve, and utilize resources of unique character and value for the community.

Policies

376
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 19 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

ROS-7.1 Preserve and enhance open space resources in Murrieta.

ROS-7.2 Designate open space to preserve habitat and scenic views of natural areas.

ROS-7.3 Seek opportunities to designate open space along waterways, while also providing for the development of trails.

ROS-7.4 When possible, link open space and parks for the movement of wildlife and people.

..Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures beyond the goals and policies identified in the proposed General Plan 2035 are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.3-20 through Page 5.3-31)2

Projects in hillside areas would be evaluated to verify compliance with the above General Plan 2035 goals and policie s, as well as the provisions of the MDC, which address the visual character/quality of a development site and its s urroundings. Furthermore, projects in hillside areas would also undergo environmental review on a project -by-project basis, in order to evaluate th e relationship between the existing visual character istics of the site and its surroundings and a given project . Provided this background, impacts would be less than significant.

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD CREATE NEW SOURCES OF LIGHT/GLARE THAT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT VIEWS IN THE AREA.

Level of Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

Goals and Policies in the Proposed General Plan 2035:

..LAND USE ELEMENT

Goal LU-20 West of Warm Springs Creek, preserve the historic rural ch aracter of the Los Alamos Hills area by maintaining its unique environment rural style with low density development and small rural roads while preserving natural features.

Policies
LU-20.10 Encourage the minimal use of outdoor lighting to maintain the nighttime dark sky in the rural Los Alamos Hills area.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures beyond the goals and policies identified in the proposed General Plan 2035 are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.3-31 through 5.3-32)2

Proposed Project - No Substantial Change From Previous Analysis 377
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 20 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

Impacts from light and glare would remain less than significant with the review for consistency with the Murrieta Development Code. This would be confirmed with the design, installation, and ope ration of all exterior lighting would reduce in a manner to address glare, light spillover onto adjacent properties, or other conflicts. Lastly, compliance with General Plan 2035 Policy LU-20.10, which addresses lighting in the Los Alamos Hills area, would further minimize potential impacts within that hillside area . Lastly, projects in hillside areas would be reviewed for compliance Section 16.18.110 “Mount Palomar Lighting Standards” to ensure dark skies are maintained throughout the City.

..FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD CREATE SHADE AND SHADOWS THAT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USES.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

..Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.3-33)2

Projects in hillside areas are reviewed for consistency with Murrieta Development Code Chapters 16.08,

16.10, 16.12, 16.14, and 16.18. This includes provisions to address potential shade and shadow affects on adjacent properties, including parcel coverage, density and intensity, setbacks, and building height and placement. Also, projects would be subject to environmental review on a project -level basis. With this review, it requires an analysis of shade and shadow impacts. Incorporation of mitigation measures would be brought forward on a project-level basis to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level.

..DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 AND CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT COULD RESULT IN CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE AESTHETICS, LIGHT, AND GLARE IMPACTS.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Potentially Significant Impact.

Mitigation Measures: Refer to Mitigation Measures AES-1 to AES-3. No additional mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

..Aesthetics impacts associated with implementation of the proposed General Plan 2035 would be less than significant by adherence to and/or compliance with goals and policies in the proposed General Plan 2035, compliance with the Murrieta Development Code, a nd recommended mitigation measures. No significant unavoidable aesthetics impacts would occur as a result of buildout of the proposed General Plan 2035. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.3-33 through Page 5.3-34)2

Proposed Project - No Substantial Change From Previous Analysis

It was determined that at a cumulative level, the General Plan 2035 goals and polici es would reduce the incremental aesthetic impacts on the region to less than a significant level with implementation of Mitigation 378
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 21 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

Measures AES-1 to AES-3 as described above. Additionally, it was determined that it would not result in any regional aesthetic impacts that extend beyond the City’s borders. As the code amendment modifies and clarifies existing planning and engineering standards for hillside areas, it is not anticipated that it will increase impacts at a cumulative level as every project would be reviewed for compliance with the Murrieta Development Code. Furthermore, architectural plans for any future buildings would be reviewed by the City prior to the issuance of building permits, including whether the exterior building materials or exterior lights would produce substantial glare. Conformance with the Murrieta Municipal Code, permit plan checks, and reviews by City staff would ensure that substantial lighting and glare impacts from future building and development would not be created.

All in all, provided the preceding discussion for the issue areas covered under Aesthetics, there would not be a substantial change relative to aesthetic resourc e impacts as identified from those which were disclosed and analyzed by the Negative Declaration and General Plan 2035 Final Environmental Impact Report for this issue area (Aesthetics), and no new or increased impacts are forecasted to result from this Project. Given the preceding discussion, the Code updates would not create a new scenario where t here would be obstruction of views from a scenic vista; damage to scenic resources wit hin a state scenic highway, degrade the existing visual character of the site and surroundings; or create a significant impact from the generation of light or glare . To address all four of these issue areas, i ndividual projects are still subject to subsequent environmental review and site-specific analysis for consistency with CEQA, the City General Plan Goals and Policies, and Aesthetic Mitigation Measures would be carried forward on an individual project-level basis.

I. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES – Since the previous ND was adopted and certification of the EIR occurred, are there any changes in the project, changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken and/or "new information of substantial importance" that cause one or more effects to aesthetic resources including: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide or Local Importance (Important Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, or other agricultural resources, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?

YES NO

Comprehensive Development Code Negative Declaration, General Plan FEIR, and Proposed Project

Negative Declaration

The Comprehensive Development Code Negative Declaration analyzed “Agriculture Resources” under the “Land Use & Planning” section. A less -than-significant impact was rendered in terms of the Project negatively affecting agricultural resources or operations. The proposed code amendment simply modifies and clarifies existing planning and engineering standards to support future development throughout the City which would not conflict with lands designated for planned Agriculture with respect to identified Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance , and there are no Williamson Act contract lands within the City.

Additionally, the ND analyzed impacts to “Forestry Resources” under the "Biology" section of the Initial Study. Specifically, it was determined that there would render a less-than-significant impact to l ocally 379
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 22 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

designated species and/or natural communities (e.g. heritage trees, oak forests, etc.). There is no property zoned or used for forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned for timberland production within the city, or would cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland production zones. (Comprehensive Dev.

Code)1

General Plan 2035 FEIR (2011)

The General Plan 2035 FEIR analyzed this issue area under Agricultural Resources:

..IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD RESULT IN CONVERSION OF FARMLAND TO NON-AGRICULTURAL USE, INCLUDING LAND SHOWN ON THE 2008 FARMLAND MAPPING AND MONITORING PROGRAM, AS UNIQUE FARMLAND.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

..Goals and Policies in the Proposed General Plan 2035:

CONSERVATION ELEMENT

Goal CSV-10 Fresh food is grown locally and made available through multiple venues that maintain a link to the City’s agricultural heritage and promote healthy eating.

Policies

CSV-10.1 Allow agricultural uses to continue in rural residential areas.

CSV-10.2 Consider ways to allow small-scale urban agriculture in parks, schools, and neighborhoods.

CSV-10.3 Ensure that residents are permitted to grow fruits and vegetables in their yards, so long as there are not significant negative impacts to adjacent property owners.

CSV-10.4 Encourage and support the use of public lands for community gardens and other food production facilities, when feasible.

CSV-10.5 Support opportunities for local food production and access, such as farmers’ markets, community gardens, harvest sharing programs, and community supported agriculture programs.

CSV-10.6 Encourage local farmers to sell fresh food locally.

CSV-10.7 Allow public facilities such as schools, libraries, and commu nity centers to be used as Community Supported Agriculture pick-up sites, where feasible.

LAND USE ELEMENT

Goal LU-2 A community that preserves its rural characteristics in appropriate locations.

Policies
380
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 23 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

LU-2.1 Provide for the keeping of horses and other livestock, as well as farming or agricultural operations, on appropriate larger lot residential property to preserve the community’s heritage.

Goal LU-20 West of Warm Springs Creek, preserve the hist oric rural character of the Los Alamos Hills area by maintaining its unique environment rural style with low density development and small rural roads while preserving natural features.

Policies

LU-20.6 Allow the keeping of personal livestock for bot h commercial and non -commercial purposes pursuant to the standards in the City ’s Development Code, and as may be modified through a Specific Plan.

LU-20.7 Allow commercial farms, tree crops and other agricultural uses on lots of at least 2.5 acres in size consistent with Los Alamos’ long history as an agricultural community.

..Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures beyond the goals and policies identified in the proposed General Plan 2035 are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable. (Murrieta General Pl an 2035 FEIR, Page 5.9-9 through Page 5.9-11)2

Impacts to Agricultural Resources would remain below a level of significance with the implementation of the above General Plan Goals and Policies. These impacts would be reviewed on a project -level basis.

With potential development in hillside areas, large rural residential areas would rem ain in place, where agricultural uses would largely remain due to topographic conflicts . The General Plan goals and policies would support the protection of rural characteristics and the continuance for agricultural uses in these rural residential areas.

..IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 COULD CONFLICT WITH EXISTING ZONING FOR AGRICULTURAL USES, OR A WILLIAMSON ACT CONTRACT.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: No Impact.

..Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.11-12)2

There are no properties are currently under Williamson Act contracts in the City; therefore, no impacts would occur with respect to this issue area .

..DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 2035 AND OTHER CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT COULD RESULT IN CUMULATIVELY CONSIDERABLE IMPACTS TO AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact. 381
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 24 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

..Goals and Policies in the Proposed General Plan 2035: Refer to the goals and policies referenced above in this Section 5.11.

Mitigation Measures: No mitigation measures beyond the goals and policies identified in the proposed General Plan 2035 are required.

Level of Significance After Mitigation: Not Applicable. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.11-13)2

It was determined that t he potential for agricultural uses in rural residential areas would remain, and the expansion of agricultural uses in urbanized areas is encouraged. Therefore, it was determined that it would result in less than cumulatively considerable agricultural resource impacts.

..Agricultural impacts associated with implementation of the proposed General Plan 2035 would not occur or would be less than significant with compliance with and/or adherence to State and local regulations, and goal and policies in the proposed General Plan 2035. Therefore, no significant unavoidable agricultural resources impacts would occur as a result of the proposed General Plan 2035. (Murrieta General Plan 2035 FEIR, Page 5.11-13 through Page 14)2

Proposed Project - No Substantial Change From Previous Analysis

The proposed code amendment does not involve construction. Individual projects are analyzed for consistency with the MSCHP Plan , subject to subsequent environmental review , and have a project - specific analysis for consistency with CEQA and with the City General Plan goals and policies on an individual project-level basis. Given the preceding discussion, the Code updates would not create a new scenario where there would be the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide or Local I mportance (Important Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, or other agricultural resources, to non -agricultural use; conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. To ensure agricultural resources are not negatively impacted from hillside development, individual projects would still be subject to subsequent environmental review and site -specific anal ysis for consistency with CEQA and the City General Plan goals and policies.

II. AIR QUALITY - Since the previous ND was adopted and certification of the EIR occurred, are there any changes in the project, changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in one or more substantial adverse physical impacts associated with (a) a conflict or obstruction of the implementation of the applicable air quality plan; (b) the violation of any air quality standards or contribution to an existing or projected air quality violation; (c) a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants (d) exposure of sensitive receptors to pollutants; or (e) a creation of objectionable odors?

YES NO

Comprehensive Development Code Negative Declaration, General Plan 2035 SEIR, and Proposed Project
382
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 25 of 103 ends

1. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Comprehensive Development Code, 1997.

2. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Final Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, July 19, 2011, https://www.murrietaca.gov/303/General-Plan-2035.

3. City of Murrieta, Development Services Dept., Planning Div., Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Murrieta General Plan 2035, February, 2020, https://www.murrietaca.gov/267/General-Plan-Update-SEIR.

1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 ● (951) 304-CITY (2489) ● www.MurrietaCA.gov

Negative Declaration

Impacts to Air Quality under the Comprehensive Developmen t Code Negative Declaration were determined to result in a less-than-significant impact in terms of a) violation of any air quality standard or contributing to an existing or projected air quality violation b) exposing sensitive receptors to pollutants c) altering air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate or d) creating objectionable odors.

For context/background, the Project is located within the City of Murrieta in the portion of Riverside County that lies within the South Coast Air Basin (Basin or SCAB). The Project area is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The Basin is a 6,600‐square‐mile coastal plain bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the southwest and the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains to the north and east. The Basin includes the non ‐desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties, and all of Orange County.

The ambient concentrations of air pollutants are determined by the amount of emissions released by sources and the atmosphere’s ability to transport and dilute such emissions. Natural factors that affect transport and dilution include terrain, wind, atmosp heric stability, and sunlight. Therefore, existing air quality conditions in the area are determined by such natural factors as topography, meteorology, and climate, in addition to the amount of emissions released by existing air pollutant sources. The ann ual average temperatures throughout the SCAB vary from the low to middle 60s (degrees Fahrenheit). Due to a decreased marine influence, the eastern portion of the SCAB shows greater variability in average annual minimum and maximum temperatures. Because the State of California had established Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) several years before the federal action and because of unique air quality problems introduced by the restrictive dispersion meteorology, there is a considerable difference between state and national clean air standards. As noted within the ND:

..The document regulates the following uses in conformance with the General Plan and applicable local, state and federal laws. These include, but are not limited to: affordable housing, air quality , geologic/seismic hazards, hazardous materials storage, hillside development, infrastructure mitigation, landscaping, lighting on project sites and for the regional benefit of Mount Palomar, noise, nonconforming structures, parking and loading of vehicles , signage, solid waste/recycling, transportation demand management, tree preservation, and vibrations. (Comprehensive Dev. Code, IS-11)1

General Plan 2035 SEIR (2020)

As noted within the General Plan 2035 SEIR, Impacts to Air Quality were determined to be significant and unavoidable for the basin; however, significance the level of these impacts would be determined during project review and appropriate mitigation measures would be developed as appropriate.

..THE PROPOSED PROJECT MAY CONFLICT WITH OR OBSTRUCT IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

APPLICABLE AIR QUALITY PLAN

Level of Significance Before Mitigation: Less Than Significant Impact.

..Mitigation Measures: Not Applicable
383
Dev. Code Amend. No. DCA-2021-2396
April 24, 2026

Page 26 of 103 ends
← All documents from this meeting