955 School Street
Napa, CA 94559
www.cityofnapa.org
CITY OF NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Final
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
Mayor Scott Sedgley
Vice Mayor Mary Luros
Councilmember Liz Alessio
Councilmember Bernie Narvaez
Councilmember Beth Painter
3:30 PM City Hall Council ChambersTuesday, April 5, 2022 3:30PM Afternoon Session
No Evening Session
3:30 P.M. AFTERNOON SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER: 3:33 P.M.
1.A. Roll Call:
Councilmember Alessio, Councilmember Narvaez, Councilmember Painter, Vice Mayor Luros, and Mayor Sedgley
Present: 5 -
2. AGENDA REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS:
City Clerk Carranza announced the following supplemental items:
Item 4.: Email from Dalton J. Piercey.
Item 6.B.: PowerPoint presentation by City staff.
Item 6.C.: PowerPoint presentation by City staff.
Item 6.D.:
- Updated Attachment 1 - Resolution, correcting a typographical error in recital 1, from "ordinance," to "resolution."
- Emails from Sharyn Fernandez, Lori Stelling and Lynne Baker. (Copies of all supplemental documents are included in Attachment 1)
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
3.A. 86-2022
Recognition of Lark Ferrell, Housing Manager
Mayor Sedgley and Councilmembers read the proclamation. Housing Manager Ferrell received the proclamation and provided remarks.
April 5, 2022CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Final
3.B. 87-2022 Education and Sharing Day, April 12, 2022
Mayor Sedgley and Councilmembers read the proclamation. Rabbi Elchonon Tenenbaum accepted the proclamation and provided remarks.
3.C. 89-2022 Sexual Assault Awareness Month
Mayor Sedgley and Councilmembers read the proclamation. Bailie, NEWS Sexual Assault Victim Services Program Manager, accepted the proclamation and provided remarks.
3.D. 133-2022
Blue Ribbon - National Child Abuse Prevention Month
Mayor Sedgley and Councilmembers read the proclamation. Michele Grupe, Executive Director of the COPE Family Center and Jennifer Gonzales, Chief of Police of the Napa Department, received the proclamation and provided remarks.
4. PUBLIC COMMENT:
(See supplemental documents in Attachment 1)
John Sidorski - provided comments regarding the lack of restrictions regarding the placement of solar panels and shared photos of the glare into his home from the solar panels of a neighboring home. He asked who he could contact regarding the matter.
Russ Jones - provided comments regarding speeding on Kilburn Avenue.
Cheryl Meyerdirk - provided comments regarding abandoned vehicles near the Laurel Street Apartments.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approval of the Consent Agenda
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Luros, seconded by Councilmember Alessio, to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Narvaez, Painter, Luros, and Sedgley5 -
5.A. 106-2022
City Council Meeting Minutes
Approved the February 1, 2022, February 8, 2022 and February 15, 2022 Regular Meeting Minutes and the February 8, 2022 and February 18, 2022 Special Meeting Minutes.
April 5, 2022CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Final
5.B. 111-2022 Monthly Budget and Investment Statement
Received the Monthly Budget and Investment Statements as of January 31, 2022, and as of February 28, 2022.
5.C. 81-2022 Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) Budget Adjustment
Approved both revenue and expenditure budget adjustments to appropriate the grant revenue in the CDBG-DR Fund in the amount of $420,094 for affordable multifamily housing projects, as documented in Budget Adjustment No.
BE2204501.
5.D. 101-2022
Emergency Replacement of Oak Street Storm Drain
Determined there was a need to continue the emergency action to execute and implement construction contracts for the replacement of the Oak Street Storm Drain from Franklin Street to Brown Street, and determine that the actions authorized by this item are exempt from CEQA.
5.E. 123-2022
Storm Drain Infrastructure Condition Assessment
Authorized the Public Works Director to execute on behalf of the City an amendment to Agreement No. C2020-116 with National Plant Services, Inc., for a Storm Drain Infrastructure Condition Assessment in the increased amount of $475,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $875,000.
5.F. 46-2022
Environmental Health and Safety Services
Authorized the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 2 to City Agreement number C2020-217 with Du-All Safety, LLC for environmental health and safety services including safety inspections, chemical safety, written safety programs, and training, in an amount not to exceed $350,000, for a total contract amount of up to $475,000.
5.G. 99-2022
Public Works Department Classification Specifications and Salary Ranges for positions in the Streets Crew
Adopted Resolution R2022-026 (1) Amending the City Classification Plan by Adopting the Classification Specifications and Salary Ranges for Napa City Employees’ Association positions in the Public Works Department; and (2) Amending the Budget Staffing Plan to add and delete positions in the Public Works Department to implement the amendment to the Classification Plan.
Enactment No: R2022-026
5.H. 100-2022
Public Works Department Classification Specifications - Electrician I and Electrician II
Adopted Resolution R2022-027 amending the City Classification Plan by Adopting Classification Specification Revisions for Electrician I and Electrician II.
Enactment No: R2022-027
April 5, 2022CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Final
5.I. 98-2022 Utilities Department Classification & Compensation Study Adopted Resolution R2022-028 (1) Amending the City Classification Plan by Adopting the Classification Specifications and Salary Ranges for Napa City Employees’ Association Positions in the Utilities Department; and (2) Amending the Budget Staffing Plan to add and delete positions in the Utilities Department to implement the amendment to the Classification Plan.
Enactment No: R2022-028
6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
6.A. 70-2022
Proclamation of Local Emergency to Respond to the Coronavirus (COVID-19)
City Manager Potter provided the staff report.
There were no requests to speak from the public.
A motion was made by Councilmember Painter, seconded by Councilmember Narvaez, to continue the Proclamation of Local Emergency authorizing the City Manager to take actions necessary to respond to the Coronavirus (COVID-19); and ratify actions taken by the City Manager in implementation of the Proclamation of Local Emergency. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Narvaez, Painter, Luros, and Sedgley5 -
6.B. 93-2022
Capital Improvement Program; 2022-2023 Budget Cycle; Project List (See supplemental documents in Attachment 1)
Public Works Director Julie Lucido opened the report and presented the Capital Improvement Program, reviewed the CIP budget and CIP project list.
Deputy Utilities Director Joy Eldredge reviewed the Utilities Department Enterprise Funds projects.
Mayor Sedgley called for public comment; there were no requests to speak.
Discussion and individual Council comments ensued. Staff responded to various questions regarding the projects.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Luros, seconded by Councilmember Narvaez, to adopt Resolution R2022-029 obligating $250,000 of Public Art funds for Soscol Median Public Art Project (PA22PR04), as documented in Budget Adjustment No.
BE2204502. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Narvaez, Painter, Luros, and Sedgley5 -
Enactment No: R2022-029
April 5, 2022CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Final
Mayor Sedgley called for a break at 5:26 P.M.; the meeting reconvened at 5:33 P.M.
6.C. 107-2022 Napa River Dredging Federal Project
(See supplemental document in Attachment 1)
Public Works Director Julie Lucido provided the report.
Discussion was turned over to Council. Individual Council comments and question ensued. Ms. Lucido, joined by Rick Thommaser, Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, joined provided responses to Council's questions. Councilmembers shared overall support of the project.
Mayor Sedgley called for public comment; there were no requests to speak.
6.D. 121-2022
Resolution Declaring a Climate Emergency
(See supplemental documents in Attachment 1)
Assistant City Manager Liz Habkirk provided the staff report.
Mayor Sedgley and Councilmembers read the resolution, declaring a climate emergency.
Mayor Sedgley called for public comment.
Chris Benz on behalf of Napa Climate Now! - thanked Council and City staff; happy to see that resources would be assigned.
Jim Wilson - shared that he was proud to see the resolution get adopted in advance of current Napa Schools for Climate Action leadership team's graduation. He also provided additional comments regarding climate change goals and thanked Council and staff for the support and encouragement.
A motion was made by Councilmember Painter, seconded by Councilmember Alessio, to adopt Resolution R2022-030, a resolution declaring a climate emergency. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Narvaez, Painter, Luros, and Sedgley5 -
Enactment No: R2022-030
April 5, 2022CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Final
7. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER:
Mayor Sedgley provided comments regarding the Ukrainian fundraiser that was held the Sunday prior. He shared that he was proud that all members of City Council attended, and thanked all the volunteers and event organizers. Councilmember Painter shared that it had been reported the fundraiser raised $107,000 and that donations would continue to be accepted for an additional two months.
Councilmember Painter provided a brief report out of information provided during the Napa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Meeting regarding allocation of the State water supply.
8. CLOSED SESSION:
City Attorney Barrett announced the closed session item.
Additionally, he provided a brief public report from a previous Council meeting closed session sharing that the City Council met in closed session on February 15, 2022, to provide direction to the City’s real property negotiators regarding the acquisition of a .21 acre portion of property located at 1701 D Street Alley (APN 002-071-010). During that closed session, City Council unanimously authorized City staff to execute an agreement with the property owners (MB Napa Creek Land (DE), LLC) to acquire the property, and the easement for the property was granted to the City on March 15, 2022.
The agreement (C2022-050) and the easement (2022-0005389) are public records available upon request to the City Clerk’s Office.
8.A. 135-2022
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code
Section 54957.6): City designated representatives: Steve Potter, Liz Habkirk, Michael Barrett, Heather Ruiz, MJ Tueros, and Jennifer Gonzalez.
Employee organization: Napa Police Officer’s Association (NPOA).
9. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned to closed session at 6:12 P.M.
Submitted by:
_______________________________
Tiffany Carranza, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 1
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
Office of the City Clerk
City Council of the City of Napa
Regular Meeting
April 5, 2022
FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
AFT
ERNOON SESSION:
SUBM
ITTED PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
4. PU
BLIC COMMENT:
1) Email from Dalton J. Piercey received on March 21, 2022.
6. ADMI
NISTRATIVE REPORTS:
6.B
. Capital Improvement Program; 2022-2023 Budget Cycle; Project List • PowerPoint Presentation by City Staff.
6.C
. Napa River Dredging Federal Project
• PowerPoint Presentation by City Staff.
6.D
. Resolution Declaring a Climate Emergency
• Updated Attachment 1 - Resolution, correcting a typographical error in recital 1, from “ordinance,” to “resolution.”
1) Email from Sharyn Fernandez received on April 4, 2022. 2) Email from Lori Stelling received on April 4, 2022.
3) Email from Lynne Baker received on April 5, 2022.
SUBM
ITTED DURING THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
4. PU
BLIC COMMENT:
1) P hotos from John Sidorski received on April 5, 2022.
Item 4. Public Comment
collective acts of unprofessionalism with civil and criminal acts thrown in. Believe it or not. I have performed music in Napa Valley since I was 19 and I have seen it all.
The recent development of regulating music “busking” in downtown yes is helpful in that we can offer a more professional look to music/arts performances in downtown. However looking at the plan for the events in Dwight Murray and Veterans Park, I can see clearly that the planners are not music based professionals whom have worked with musicians. In my years of acting as a Promoter/Performing Musician I can see that there are positives and negatives to the beginning of the event. And most importantly I see another action by city legislation that results in the control of music opportunities either fair or not fair. Myself having worked concerts since the age of 11 years, I like the "everybody wins" approach resulting in “good music business”. That is a another element I find lacking in governmental decision making in Napa County in general.
Because local music is a “Gig Based Industry” the pandemic severely impacted musicians as myself and other part time musicians whom are dependent on our gig based industry. And as well it extends to those individuals whom provide sub-services for the local music industry.
Such as instruction and teaching, recording and producing, instrument repair, professional music business, booking/contracting and multimedia technical services. To mention a few. I have had 8 musicians whom had to move from Napa County during the pandemic. One musician whom I know was living in his car homeless at the onset of the pandemic and died.
This is a continuing cycle of musicians going on the street or having to give up their life in Napa and move somewhere else. For the grace of god I am still here, barely. Fighting every day to keep my head above the water line.
I am disappointed that I did not see any provision in your distribution of the American Rescue Plan Act for the local music industry. We are at the bottom of the expendable cash pyramid.
And strapped additionally with a legislative handicap. Yes some can argue that the music industry does not end at the Napa County line, thats true. But musicians know that demographics is of key importance to their success at home and elsewhere. Though the pandemic neutralized the demographic function for music business.
In the music business we have a term called “Middle Man Complex”. That term infers to the act of a individual being between the musician and the money. In that the middle man controls the opportunity to earn the income and as well takes the lion’s share. As we saw once in 90’s where a booking agent was violating
California Agency Laws by booking music acts for 3000
dollars paying the musicians in form as employee’s one third of the money and keeping the rest. The DA failed to listen to me and that person escaped prosecution for his eight year fraud.
I have to offer this, I know many of you and the people in City government. I have found many individuals of goodwill and good heart in city government. Yet, I have to offer that some decisions you are making are counter productive to a good local music industry for musicians of today and tomorrow. In form I find those decision are as well fostered in the middle man complex.
I stand ready if I can be helpful to you in concern of Music Industry knowledge.
Dalton J. Piercey
To: Napa City Council 3-20-22
City Of Napa
955 School Street
City Hall, South Wing
Napa, CA 94559
From: Dalton J. Piercey
Napa, ca. 94558
Dear City Manager, Mayor & Council Members:
I have read the report in the Register on the cities use and access of the American Rescue Plan Act Funding. In one thought I was immediately disappointed and the other raises the same concerns that continue to foster my musician rebellion towards the status quo. Musicians are rebels at heart armed with melody and poetry FYI.
As of this date I have been working on a feature writing/story and to my surprise indicates that Napa Town proper and city government has had and continues a systematic form of encroachment on music opportunities for local working music business professionals/musicians since as early as 1962. I say this with humility for I know and understand that many individuals and city officials are not experienced music business professionals. So my reasoning is, I continue to see this in actions that the City Government, Planning Department and NCRD with others take in concern of our local music industry.
For you to have a more enhanced perspective the first important element you need to know and understand is that our local music industry is based on what we professionals term as a “Gig Based Industry”. For a clearer explanation that means music shows in venues that we find and book to derive funding for our small music business city and county wide. That will pay our bills, our rent and create in sustaining a professional music career.
You could think of a “Gig Based Industry” in the form of contractors bidding on trade work opportunities. The keyword being opportunities. When the city and planning department act with their bureaucracy to legislate entertainment permits and regulation controls of venues that have or want to host performances, potential operators finding that the costs of over legislation with the required financial costs exceed (along with volumes of planning department red tape) the desire to have a stage and live entertainment becomes impossible for the majority. The systemic result is the loss of opportunities that would provide income into a “Gig Based Industry”. Either pro industry or local industries both are diminished with the loss of opportunities. Any industry has to have cash flowing through it to succeed.
In Calistoga I met a Wine Baron from Napa town whom told me once “that we do not want music to be successful or creator than wine”. I talked with a downtown business merchant whom has passed and he said “all of us in downtown have concluded that music is no good money”. With the long and continued diminished capacity continuing for local music we have a cultural deficit in that we have generational detachment in music business and music performance. That in turn contributes a whole myriad collection of political, personal and collective acts of unprofessionalism with civil and criminal acts thrown in. Believe it or not. I have performed music in Napa Valley since I was 19 and I have seen it all.
The recent development of regulating music “busking” in downtown yes is helpful in that we can offer a more professional look to music/arts performances in downtown. However looking at the plan for the events in Dwight Murray and Veterans Park, I can see clearly that the planners are not music based professionals whom have worked with musicians. In my years of acting as a Promoter/Performing Musician I can see that there are positives and negatives to the beginning of the event. And most importantly I see another action by city legislation that results in the control of music opportunities either fair or not fair. Myself having worked concerts since the age of 11 years, I like the "everybody wins" approach resulting in “good music business”. That is a another element I find lacking in governmental decision making in Napa County in general.
Because local music is a “Gig Based Industry” the pandemic severely impacted musicians as myself and other part time musicians whom are dependent on our gig based industry. And as well it extends to those individuals whom provide sub- services for the local music industry. Such as instruction and teaching, recording and producing, instrument repair, professional music business, booking/contracting and multimedia technical services. To mention a few. I have had 8 musicians whom had to move from Napa County during the pandemic. One musician whom I know was living in his car homeless at the onset of the pandemic and died. This is a continuing cycle of musicians going on the street or having to give up their life in Napa and move somewhere else. For the grace of god I am still here, barely.
Fighting every day to keep my head above the water line.
I am disappointed that I did not see any provision in your distribution of the American Rescue Plan Act for the local music industry. We are at the bottom of the expendable cash pyramid. And strapped additionally with a legislative handicap. Yes some can argue that the music industry does not end at the Napa County line, thats true. But musicians know that demographics is of key importance to their success at home and elsewhere. Though the pandemic neutralized the demographic function for music business.
In the music business we have a term called “Middle Man Complex”. That term infers to the act of a individual being between the musician and the money. In that the middle man controls the opportunity to earn the income and as well takes the lion’s share. As we saw once in 90’s where a booking agent was violating California
Agency Laws by booking music acts for 3000 dollars paying the musicians in form as employee’s one third of the money and keeping the rest. The DA failed to listen to me and that person escaped prosecution for his eight year fraud.
I have to offer this, I know many of you and the people in City government. I have found many individuals of goodwill and good heart in city government. Yet, I have to offer that some decisions you are making are counter productive to a good local music industry for musicians of today and tomorrow. In form I find those decision are as well fostered in the middle man complex.
I stand ready if I can be helpful to you in concern of Music Industry knowledge.
Dalton J. Piercey
Dalton is a Digital Media Specialist
And Performing Musician/ Independent Producer
And Recording Engineer
Instructor Performance Techniques For The Musicians Stage Gretschkat Music.
A Music Artist And Music Business Professional
Published Music Scribe/ Music Journalist
A Graduate Of Sonoma State University
City Council Presentation
Capital Improvement Program
April 05, 2022Agenda Item 6.B
VINE TRAIL GAP CLOSURE
ALL PHOTOS: VINE TRAIL GAP CLOSURE
City Council Meeting
4/5/2022
Supplmental - 6.B.
From: City Staff
• Review & provide direction regarding proposed Capital Improvement Program for the 2022-2023 budget cycle
• Highlight of new, completed and upcoming projects
INTRODUCTION
WORKSHOP
RECOMMENDED ACTION
• (1) Provide direction regarding proposed Capital
Improvement Program for the 2022-2023 budget cycle.; and • (2) Adopt a resolution (1) obligating $250,000 of Public Art funds for Soscol Median Public Art Project (PA22PK04), as documented in Budget Adjustment No. BE2204502.
This Budget Process
• Upcoming budget documents are for single year (FY 22‐23) • CIP portion of budget is also approved for single year (FY 22‐23) • Five‐year CIP developed to plan for future expenditures (through FY 26‐27)
• Today’s item will present CIP separately from operating budget, to obtain input & direction
• CIP to be approved with full budget in June
Next Step
• Finalize CIP based on Council input & direction
• Presenting Projects in three lists:
• (1) Projects Completed List
• (2) Projects Eliminated List
• (3) Projects Added – New Projects & Added Funding
• Project Summary Sheets for all Projects in the 5‐year CIP
City Council Workshop:
Priorities Addressed through CIP
• Addressing Aging Infrastructure
• Park Infrastructure Repairs
• Streets and Sidewalks Repairs and Improvements
• Multi‐modal Transportation Improvements (Implementation of Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans)
• Traffic Safety & Traffic Calming
• City Building Facilities Repairs
• Storm Drain System Assessment & Repairs
Council Stated Priorities Regarding Infrastructure:
• Fix What is Broken
• Finish What is Started
• Leverage Grant Funding
Focus for FY 22/23 General Fund CIP’s
• 64 projects (new projects or additional funding)
• 17 funding sources intended for Capital projects
totals $41,478,048
CIP for 2022-2023 budget cycle
• 124 projects (new projects or additional
funding)
• 19 funding sources intended for Capital projects
totals $169,848,048
5-Year ClP (2022-2023 through 2026-2027)
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
• (1)-Year 2022-2023 total CIP budget $41,478,048
• (64) projects with funding from (17) sources
• Water Enterprise – (19) projects totaling $9.80 million • Measure T – (4) projects totaling $9.15 million
• ARPA – (6) projects totaling $8.48 million
• GF Building Reserve – (7) projects totaling $2.85 million • General Fund Reserve – (9) projects totaling $1.30 million Water Enterprise Fund
9,801,128
24%
Measure T
9,150,000
22%
ARPA ‐ American Rescue
Plan Act of 2021
8,480,000
20%
State Gas Tax
3,625,000
9%
CIP Facilities Reserve
2,850,000
7%
FEMA
1,333,536
3%
Linda Vista DIF ‐
Residential Development
1,300,000
3%
CIP General Reserve
1,295,000
3%
Public Art Fund
775,000
2%
Materials Diversion
Enterprise Fund
635,000
2%
River Park Assessment
500,000
1%
North Jefferson DIF ‐ Street Improvement
500,000
1%
CalOES
333,384
1%
Risk Management Fund
300,000
1%
RMRA
250,000
1%
Lake Park Assessment
250,000
1%
FY 2022‐2023 CIP BY SOURCE
Source Total
Water Enterprise Fund 9,801,128
Measure T 9,150,000
ARPA - American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 8,480,000
State Gas Tax 3,625,000
CIP Facilities Reserve 2,850,000
FEMA 1,333,536
Linda Vista DIF - Residential Development 1,300,000
CIP General Reserve 1,295,000
Public Art Fund 775,000
Materials Diversion Enterprise Fund 635,000
River Park Assessment 500,000
North Jefferson DIF - Street Improvement 500,000
CalOES 333,384
Risk Management Fund 300,000
RMRA 250,000
Lake Park Assessment 250,000
Other Agencies (Not shown in chart) 100,000
GRAND TOTAL 41,478,048
• 64 projects within 11 categories for $41,478,048
• Streets – Paving & concrete projects $15.10 million not including proposed LSPP & SW Improvement Program budgets • Water Distribution, Quality, Supply, and Transmission projects totaling $10.22 million
• Facilities $6.79 million in projects from Facility Conditions Assessment identified immediate needs
• Council priorities – Streets & Sidewalks, efficient high-quality drinking water for health & safety of community & investment in existing City facilities to safely deliver services to community Street
15,100,000
37%
Facilities
6,785,000
16%
Storm Drain
4,715,000
11%Water Distribution
3,650,000
9%
Water Quality
(Treatment)
3,490,000
9%
Water Transmission
3,078,048
8%
Bike/Pedestrian
Facility
1,365,000
3%
Watershed (Supply
Source)
1,350,000
3%
Park / Public Art
1,345,000
3%
Miscellaneous
500,000
1%
Bridge
100,000
0%
FY 2022‐2023 CIP BY CATEGORY
Category 2023
Street 15,100,000
Facilities 6,785,000
Storm Drain 4,715,000
Water Distribution 3,650,000
Water Quality (Treatment) 3,490,000
Water Transmission 3,078,048
Bike/Pedestrian Facility 1,365,000
Watershed (Supply Source) 1,350,000
Park / Public Art 1,345,000
Miscellaneous 500,000
Bridge 100,000
GRAND TOTAL 41,478,048
• (9) total existing projects funded through General Fund-CIP for 2022-2023
• (1) bicycle/pedestrian path project local funding qualifies towards requirements of Measure T program
• (4) projects under miscellaneous and facilities category, all increase efficiencies
• (4) parks projects to repair or replace community infrastructure and meet regulatory requirements
General Fund‐CIP 2022‐2023
Bicycle & Pedestrian $550,000 43%
Bridges/Facilities/Misc $200,000 15%
Parks $545,000 42%
Total $1,295,000 100%
• 5-Year FY 22/23 – FY 26/27 total CIP budget $169,848,048 • 124 projects with funding from 19 sources
• Water Enterprise – 84 projects totaling $73.6 million • Measure T – 22 projects totaling $39.85 million
• General Fund – Approximately $1 million per year with $9.7 million Parking Garage pushed out to FY 26/27
• GF Building Reserve –Projects to address immediate City Building Facilities needs and advance Asset Management
Water Enterprise
Fund
$73,557,690
43%Measure T
$39,850,000
23%
CIP General Reserve
$17,003,282
10%
ARPA
$8,480,000
5%
State Gas Tax
$7,425,000
4%
CIP Facilities Reserve
$4,350,000
3%
FEMA
$4,172,286
2%
Materials Diversion
Enterprise Fund
$3,445,000
2%
Parking DIF
$2,769,535
2%
Parking Replacement Funds
$2,372,183
1%
Linda Vista DIF ‐
Residential Development
$1,300,000
1%
Public Art Fund
$1,280,000
1%
Source Total
Water Enterprise Fund 73,557,690
Measure T 39,850,000
CIP General Reserve 17,003,282
ARPA - American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 8,480,000
State Gas Tax 7,425,000
CIP Facilities Reserve 4,350,000
FEMA 4,172,286
Materials Diversion Enterprise Fund 3,445,000
Parking DIF 2,769,535
Parking Replacement Funds 2,372,183
Linda Vista DIF - Residential Development 1,300,000
Public Art Fund 1,280,000
CalOES 1,043,072
North Jefferson DIF - Street Improvement 1,000,000
River Park Assessment 500,000
Other Agencies 500,000
Risk Management Fund 300,000
Lake Park Assessment 250,000
RMRA 250,000
GRAND TOTAL 169,848,048
5 YEAR PLAN‐CIP BY SOURCE
Less than 1%
CalOES
North Jefferson DIF
River Park Assessment
Other Agencies
Risk Management Fund
Lake Park Assessment
RMRA
GENERAL FUND
*INCLUDED FEDERAL GRANT
VINE TRAIL GAP CLOSURE*
CORPORATION YARD
GATE
COMPLETED PROJECTS BUDGET
CYCLE 21/22
LAS FLORES
COMMUNITY CENTER
PARKING LOT REPAVING
GENERAL FUND
COMPLETED PROJECTS BUDGET
CYCLE 21/22
PEARL STREET PARKING
GARAGE STRUCTURAL REPAIRS**
** ADDED TO CIP DURING FY21/22
MEASURE T
SOSCOL AVE REHAB
CENTRAL TO LA HOMA
COMPLETED PROJECTS BUDGET
CYCLE 21/22
WESTWOOD REHAB PHASE
2A – BREMAN & BANCROFT
COURTS
TROWER AVE REHAB
PHASE 2
TRANCAS STREET REHAB
SB-1/RMRA FUND
Operations Paving & Sidewalk Program
COMPLETED PROJECTS* BUDGET
CYCLE 21/22
MONARCH/PAULSON AREA
VINEYARD PARK AREA
GRANDVIEW FOSTER AREA
SB-1/RMRA FUND
Operations Paving & Sidewalk Program
COMPLETED PROJECTS BUDGET
CYCLE 21/22
STANLEY LANE
BIKE TRAIL
OAK STREET EMERGENCY REPAIR
COMPLETED PROJECTS* BUDGET CYCLE
21/22
SB-1/RMRA FUND
Emphasis
on Street
Conditions
Considerations
• Funding for street repairs is additionally addressing:
– accessibility requirements (curb ramps and sidewalk
repairs)
– storm drain repairs/replacements
– bicycle facilities
– traffic safety
– traffic signals
• Elements require detailed surveys, additional
engineering services, take longer to prepare, and
increase costs
• Streets first paved by operations team 5-10+ years ago are aging and now deteriorating
• Construction costs increasing much faster than revenue • Overall paving conditions are declining
Emphasis
• Filled all vacant street maintenance worker positions and reduced number of vacancies in engineering division
• Created Street Improvement Team with Engineering and
Operations staff to focus on pavement improvments
• Pavement System Plan being developed currently to
best target investments for improvements
GENERAL FUND:
(1) NEW PROJECT
Two year
focus: FY 22‐23 &
FY 23‐24
GENERAL FUND:
(1) NEW PROJECT ADDED
One year
focus: FY 22‐
23 SR 29 UNDERCROSSING
BUHMAN CREEK
BANK REPAIR
KENNEDY PARK
BACKFLOW DEVICE
BRIDGE ASSESSMENTS
GENERAL FUND:
PARKS – NO NEW PROJECTS
Two year
focus: FY 22‐
23 & FY 23‐24
KENNEDY PARK PATHWAYS
PARK AMENITY REPLACEMENTS
PLAYGROUND RETROFITS
GENERAL FUND –
BUILDING RESERVE
One year focus:
FY 22‐23
GENERAL FUND –
BUILDING RESERVE
One year
focus: FY 21‐22
City Building Facilities Program
• Prepare Construction Documents for projects
initially funded in FY20/21 & FY21/22
• Future adjustments to budgets expected as
professional services consultants complete
investigations, surveys, designs, and estimates
FC20PW03 Police & Fire Admin Building HVAC Chiller
FC22PW01 City Hall (Transformer, HVAC, Roof)
FC22PW02 Senior Center (paving, site work & ADA)
FC22PW03 Las Flores Community Center Paving and ADA
FC22PW04 Corp Yard Electrical System Evaluation and Plan FC22PW05 CSB Electrical System Evaluation and Design
FC22PW06 Parking Facilities FCA and ADA Assessments
FC22PW07 Senior Center Pedestrian Bridge Repair
GENERAL FUND –
BUILDING RESERVE
Two year
focus: FY 22‐
23, FY23‐24
City Building Facilities Program
• Develop city-wide, multi-year contracts
for repair of building elements:
• Roofs
• Exteriors
• Develop city-wide, multi-year contract
for access barrier removals
• Develop a Building Facilities Asset
Management Plan
ROOFING NEEDS
EXTERIOR NEEDS
ACCESS BARRIERS
AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN
ACT OF 2021 (ARPA)
One year focus:
FY 22‐23
MEASURE T ‐ 5‐YEAR PLAN
NO NEW PROJECTS
Five year: FY 22‐23,
23‐24, 24‐25, 25‐26 &
26‐27
MEASURE T
Five year: FY
22‐23, 23‐24,
24‐25, 25‐26 &
26‐27
JEFFERSON STREET
REHABILITATION
WESTWOOD
NEIGHBORHOOD
INTERIOR STREETS
AUTOMATED TRAFFIC
SIGNAL MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS (ATMS)
LAUREL AVENUE
REHABILITATION
RMRA (SB 1), GAS TAX
Five year: FY 22‐
23, 23‐24, 24‐25,
25‐26 & 26‐27
Funding sources also contribute to Public Works Operations
UNCONTROLLED CROSSWALK
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
RMRA (SB1), GAS TAX
Five year: FY 22‐
23, 23‐24, 24‐25,
25‐26 & 26‐27
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS
(SOSCOL/OLD SOSCOL – PHASE 2)
PUBLIC ART FUND
Three year
focus: FY 22‐23,
23‐24, 24‐25
ADDITIONALLY, $250,000 IN PUBLIC ART FUNDING IS PROPOSED FOR ALLOCATION FOR THE SOSCOL MEDIAN PUBLIC ART PROJECT IN FY21/22
PUBLIC ART FUND
Two year
focus: FY 21‐22,
22‐23
ROUNDABOUT
PUBLIC ART
SOSCOL MEDIAN
PUBLIC ART
TRAFFIC SAFETY AND TRAFFIC
CALMING PROJECTS
• Local Roadway Safety Plan – HSIP and OBAG Eligibility • 2 pedestrian beacons each year ($50,000 annually from gas tax) + 6 more primarily along vine trail in FY 21-22 as part of grant to support housing development
• Pedestrian Improvements in Westwood neighborhood
• 5-way intersection project (Third/Silverado/Coombsville/East), however, requires full financial plan before it can move forward to construction
• Advanced Traffic Management System-traffic signal interconnect, signal coordination
• Some traffic improvements possible with pavement rehabilitation projects (Measure T, SB-1 funding sources)
• From operating budget (not CIP)-Local Roadways Safety Plan and start of “Vision Zero” policy development
• Other: Partnership with NVTA, County & Caltrans for Imola corridor multi-modal improvements, grant likely to begin project
IN CONSTRUCTION FY 22/23 BUDGET
CYCLE 22/23
SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS
(SOSCOL/OLD SOSCOL – PHASE 2)
AUTOMATED TRAFFIC
SIGNAL MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS (ATMS)
* JEFFERSON ST *
IN CONSTRUCTION FY 22/23 BUDGET
CYCLE 22/23
SENIOR CENTER BRIDGE
RAILING REPAIR
BROWNS VALLEY CREEK
BANK REPAIR – BUHMAN PARK
IN CONSTRUCTION FY 22/23 BUDGET
CYCLE 22/23
POLICE ADMINISTRATION HVAC
CORPORATION YARD ELECTRICAL REPAIR
IN CONSTRUCTION FY 22/23 BUDGET
CYCLE 22/23
JEFFERSON STREET RULE 20A – OVERHEAD
TO UNDERGROUND UTILITY CONVERSION
UTILITY PROJECTS COMPLETED
Hillcrest Pump Station Rebuild
($2.1M FEMA funds)
Silverado Highlands Pump Station Rebuild
($1.4M FEMA funds)
HILLCREST SILVERADO
UTILITY PROJECTS COMPLETED
Milliken Raw Water Pipeline ‐ 50 Repairs ($584K FEMA funds) Barwick‐Jamieson Plant Safety Upgrades—Stairs and Railings ($187K) Water Main Upgrades (2,500 ft, $325K):
• Randolph St (1,110 ft)
• McCormick Ln (235 ft)
• S Franklin St (540 ft)
• S Seminary St (620 ft)
MILLIKEN PIPE
REPAIRS
TREATMENT PLANT
NEW SAFETY STAIRS
WATER MAIN
REPLACEMENT
UTILITY PROJECTS IN
CONSTRUCTION FY 22-23
Browns Valley Road Water Main Replacement
Coordinated with Measure T ($1M)
Westwood Water Main Upgrades
Coordinated with Measure T ($1.3M)
Montgomery St Water Main Replacements
Coordinated with 10‐Mile Paving ($500K)
Westgate Pressure Regulating Station ($200k)
Downtown East Side Pressure Regulating Station ($1M)
HIGHLIGHTED UTILITY PROJECTS
FY 2024-FY 2027
Wood Waste Materials Diversion Bio‐Gasification
Assessment at City MDF ($400K). Potential $25+M Project.
Hennessey Treatment Plant Rehabilitation
Improvements & Upgrades Phase II ($14M)
Hennessey Spillway Flow Expansion ($10M)
Watershed Sampling and Analysis Program
($200k/yr, $100k County funds)
Water Main Replacements on Coombs Street ahead of
Measure T ($300k)
SPECIAL THANKS TO:
Management:
Public Works
Engineering and
Finance
Collaboration
• Public Works
• Utilities
• Parks and
Recreation
• Community
Development
• Fire Department
• Police Department
C
I
P
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1) Provide direction regarding proposed Capital
Improvement Program for the 2022-2023 budget
cycle
2) Adopt a resolution (1) obligating $250,000 of
Public Art funds for Soscol Median Public Art
Project (PA22PK04), as documented in Budget
Adjustment No. BE2204502.
Questions, discussion, direction to
staff & recommended action
General Fund revenue (property tax, sales tax, TOT) may be used for any City purpose All non‐General Fund revenue must be used for its specified limited purpose, including:
General Fund
Annual
Contribution
City Buildings and
Facilities
Property
Development
Excise Tax
Capital Facilities
Replacement
Reserve
Emergency
Repairs
Emergency
Reserve
Transportation
Gas Tax
SB1
Measure T
Street
Improvement Fee
North Jefferson
Street
Improvement Fee
Solano/Orchard
Avenue Traffic
Fee
Redwood Road
Improvement Fee
Parks
Park
Development Fee
North Jefferson
Park Fee
Orchard Avenue
Park Fee
Parking
Parking Impact
Fees
Parking and
Business
Improvement Tax
Downtown
Parking
Assessment
Specific
Geographical
Areas
Big Ranch Specific
Plan Fee
Linda Vista
Specific Plan Fee
Lone Oak
Drainage Fee
River Park
Maintenance
District
Lake Park
Maintenance
District
Miscellaneous
Grants –
Federal/State
CDBG
Improvements
Fair Share
Payments by
Private
Developers
Street
Improvement
Underground Fee
GENERAL FUND
FACILITIES
ARPA
MEASURE T
OTHER FUNDS
OTHER FUNDS
OTHER FUNDS
SOLID WASTE RECYCLING
ENTERPRISE FUND & OTHER
AGENCIES
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
WATER ENTERPRISE FUND
FEMA & CalOES
Napa River Dredging
Federal Project
April 5, 2022
City Council Meeting
4/5/2022
Supplemental - 6.C.
From: City Staff
Nationally Recognized
Improvements for a Healthy,
Active River
• Flood Protection Improvements
• New Bridges
• Habitat Restoration
• Biking and Walking Trails
• Downtown Boat Dock
• Complementary Adjacent
Development
And a clear, maintained navigation
channel results in increased boating
activities, visitors, and economic
development
• Napa River is a federal navigation channel from Third Street to San Pablo Bay • US Army Corps of Engineers has responsibility for navigational dredging • Flood Control District is the local sponsor, responsible for securing a site to deposit dredge material and for local coordination
• $4.75M federal investment in dredging the Napa River
Napa River Dredging
Background
• Federal Dredging Projects:
1950, 1962, 1981, 1988,
1997/1999, and 2016 &
proposed 2022
• Channel design depth of 10
feet Mean Lower Low Water
• Previous Placement Sites:
Imola Avenue, Edgerly Island,
Kennedy Park, & proposed
South Jefferson
Clam Shell Method Operations
Kennedy Park
State Route 29
South
Jefferson
Street
The Meadows
of Napa Valley
Napa Yacht Club
City purchases 111.5
acres with FEMA
grant and conveys
property to Flood
District. (2000)
Flood District conveys 58
acres back to the City
with deed restriction
allowing Flood District to
deposit soil. (2007)
Napa Flood Control Project
Groundbreaking: July 31, 2000
South Jefferson Property
Approximately 1000 acres of farming land was
transformed to marsh, wetland, and tidal flats
SWOA 1940 SWOA 2007
Proposed
Next Steps
• Assess City Council support for depositing material at South Jefferson Street; compatible with future park development • Negotiate agreement with Flood District for use of site to deposit dredge material
• Flood District to lead community outreach efforts and obtain all required permit approvals
• Dredging planned for August‐December 2022
ATTACHMENT 1
R2022-___ Page 1 of 3 April 5, 2022
RESO
LUTION R2022-___
RESO
LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A CLIMATE
EMERGENCY
WHEREAS, there is broad scientific consensus that climate change caused by human activity represents a growing danger to human health, safety, and economic prosperity, and that the window of opportunity for long term climate preservation is rapidly closing; and
WHE
REAS, 195 countries have signed the "Paris Agreement" acknowledging the threat of climate change and the urgent need to combat it, agreeing to keep global mean temperature "well below 2°c above pre-industrial levels" and to "pursue efforts to limit temperature increase to 1.5°C;" and
WHE
REAS, the 2018 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, "Global Warming of 1.5°C," affirmed that l imiting global warming to 1.5°C would require rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society, and further projected that the earth could reach and exceed this temperature threshold as soon as 2030, far earlier than previously anticipated; and
WHE
REAS, the 2018 US government report , "Fourth National Climate Assessment," detailed the massive threat to the American economy posed by climate change and underscored the need for immediate climate emergency action at all levels of government; and
WHE
REAS, California, Napa County and their residents, economy, and environment have already experienced dramatic adverse effects from climate change, including prolonged wildfire seasons, firestorms, rising temperatures, mudslides, severe droughts, property destruction, damage to infrastructure, and loss of life; and WHER
EAS, climate breakdown, while endangering all people, disproportionately impacts the young and the most vulnerable, exacerbating existing social justice and other inequities; and
WHER
EAS, at their February 18, 2022 Council Workshop, the City Council has named Climate Change efforts as a priority for the next year; and WHERE
AS, the City of Napa is currently updating the City’s General Plan, the long-range planning document which includes elements related to land use, transportation, climate change and sustainability, and natural resources all of which will support and direct the City’s response to the climate emergency and encourages public comments on the draft General Plan.
Item 6.D.
ATTACHMENT 1
R2022-___ Page 2 of 3 April 5, 2022
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Napa as follows:
1. The Ci
ty Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this resolution are true and correct and establish the factual bases for adoption of this resolution.
2. A cli
mate emergency exists and it threatens our city, region, state, nation, and the natural world.
3. The sci
entific evidence indicates that an urgent global climate mobilization effort to reverse global warming is needed as quickly as possible towards net zero climate pollutants from public and private operations within the City by 2030.
4. The Cit
y Council has named climate change efforts as a Council Priority and commits to evaluating all planning and policy decisions through the lens of this pledge and the most current scientific evidence, and the Council directs the City Manager to use this same lens when evaluating and implementing both immediate and sustained actions in support of zero net emissions.
5. The Ci
ty Manager is hereby directed to prepare the recommended update to the City’s General Plan, to be presented to the Planning Commission and City Council for review and adoption, to document climate goals and practices that support climate protection actions. As a parallel effort, through the City’s budget review and approval process, the City Manager is hereby directed to recommend available resources (to include budget and staff) necessary for creating specific implementation strategy documents to prioritize goals into actionable tasks and projects required to accomplish General Plan Goals.
6. The Cit
y Manager is hereby further directed to develop partnerships with community organizations, businesses, schools, and regional partnerships to educate, mobilize, expand, and accelerate local, regional and statewide support for comprehensive, immediate, and sustained action to achieve its goal of net zero climate pollution.
ATTACHMENT 1
R2022-___ Page 3 of 3 April 5, 2022
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Napa at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 5th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEN
T:
ABSTAIN:
ATTES
T: ________________________
Tiffany Carranza
City
Clerk
Approv
ed as to form:
_________
________________
Michael W. Barrett
City Attorney
From: Sharyn Fernandez
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 11:21 PM
To: Beth Painter <bpain
[email protected]>
Cc: Julie Lucido <[email protected]>; Steve Potter <[email protected]> Subject: Climate Control for Napa
[EXTERNAL]
Hi there:
Having read today's(4/4/22) article on Climate Change in Napa Register, it made me think of my classes at San Jose State in the 70's, hearing of cars' pollution and the
greenhouse gas buildup. (Also about destroying part of the ozone layer). And global warming. That's how long
we've been trying to do something about it - not
two or three years!
I remember as well getting gas on alternating days, in long lines, but that was due to gas shortage. Maybe it did
helped the pollution problem (that's more prevalent in San José - smog city!) I would like to think this approach might help in the short and long run (or would people and
business move out?)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/05/13/ga
s-shortages-1970s/
https://www.npr.org/sections/pictureshow/2012/11/10/1
64792293/gas-lines-evoke-memories-oil-crises-in-the-
1970s
I know how conflicted I am driving my gas powered
vehicle, (including doing Doordash!and I hope to find a local job that I can walk to? or ride my bike or take a bus); however, with a 'social movement' - some might think of it as 'big brother', or 'social engineering', but I'd voluntarily Item 6.D.
go back to driving every other day, even or odd days, if I thought it would help.
You know it's time for real sustainability; if any building is done, build to manufacture here to use things here - at least here in California, ideally that don't rely on
transportation across the Country, or out of the Country, which we can see politically can be cut-off at short notice for political reasons, as well.
Napa is the perfect place to drive a bike (nice and flat!), too bad no Light rail vehicle system to go down the middle of Hwy 29 ( but that's a Caltrans issue?) - Carpooling is also optional, as are taxis, and I should try shopping by bus, I know...
The City should get proactive, use its stature and restrict vehicles powered by fuel!
thank you,
Sharyn Fernandez
From: Lori Stelling
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2022 11:42 PM
To: Scott Sedgley <[email protected]>; Liz Alessio <[email protected]>; Mary Luros <[email protected]>; Beth Painter <[email protected]>; Bernie Narvaez <[email protected]>; Steve Potter <[email protected]> Cc: Clerk <[email protected]>
Subject: Comment: Item 6D Climate Emergency Resolution
[EXTERNAL]
Dear Mayor Sedgley and Napa City Council Members,
As the parent of a Napa teen, I cannot pass up taking a moment tonight to voice my strong support for tomorrow’s Climate Emergency Resolution. I am deeply grateful for the work of the students from Schools for Climate Action in asking every jurisdiction within our valley to take some form of this important step.
As I’ve shared with you in the past, I feel more strongly than ever that now is the time for us to work together as a valley community (steadily, step by step) to take real policy action to address the climate emergency in a way that lets our youth know that we care deeply about their future and the healing of our planet. I view tomorrow's Climate Emergency Resolution as an important step towards every jurisdiction within our valley standing firmly behind our youth and their right to a livable future. This is the “active hope” I’ve been speaking about, which is so needed now.
Incase it didn’t cross your desk today, I also want to pass along the news that the third part of the IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report was released today (April 4th): Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change: Summary for Policymakers. You will find the report here: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth‐ assessment‐report‐working‐group‐3/ May it be beneficial in helping you and your staff determine your specific climate actions.
My family is taking notice of each step you take. We thank you for your leadership in recognizing the urgency of the climate crisis and committing to do all you can, within this crucial decade, for our children and our world.
Sincerely,
Lori Stelling
20+ year Napa resident
______________________________________________________________________________
City Council_Napa_CER_letter of support_Baker_220405.docx RE: City Council Meeting 04/05/22 Agenda Item 6D – Resolution Declaring a Climate Emergency Public Comment
April 5, 2022
To: Members of the City Council
Resolve: decide firmly on a course of action.
Thank you for adopting the Climate Emergency Resolution for the city of Napa. • The resolve shown by those who have labored for several years to achieve today’s action is commendable.
• The resolve demonstrated by the students – Emily Bit, Alisa Karish and others – to courageously stay the course and never give up is remarkable.
• The resolve of community members to testify time and again, provide background information, speak with individuals and groups shows that persistence pays off. • The resolve of City Council members to adopt the resolution speaks volumes to their determination to forge a better path for our community relative to climate action. • The resolve of countless others in and out of government to be part of the change that needs to take place in the coming years and decades shows commitment to making a difference for generations yet to come.
With deepest gratitude,
Lynne Baker, RN, MS
Lynne Baker