Napa City Council
May 17, 2022

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.

Ongoing 5% HMGP / BRIC ,
Internal
Funding
Goal 3: Promote a fire
safe community.

High ps-WF-CN12, ps-WFCN-13, psCC-CN-18
ma-WF-CN-43 Wildfire SP -
Structural
Projects
Ongoing 2015 City of
Napa
Continue to upgrade existing
water utility infrastructure to
increase redundancy in high
fire hazard areas especially at
the rural and urban interface to
minimize the risk of losing
access to infrastructure during
an event.

Utilities Department High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
AFG
Goal 5: Create a more
disaster resilient
community. Goal 3:

Promote a fire safe
community.

Medium ps-WF-CN11, ps-WFCN-16
ma-WF-CN-44 Wildfire PPRO -
Property
Protection
Ongoing 2015 City of
Napa
Ensure the Fire Department
reviews all building plans in
WUI areas for defensible space,
emergency vehicle access, fire
flow and ignition resistant
construction requirements.

Fire Department Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.

Ongoing Planning HMGP / BRIC ,
AFG
Goal 3: Promote a fire
safe community.

Low ps-WF-CN12, ps-CCCN-18
ma-WF-CN-45 Wildfire PPRO -
Property
Protection
Ongoing 2015 City of
Napa
Provide an ongoing vegetation
management program such as
the City's Weed Abatement
ordinance to prohibit the spread
of wildfire in ground and aerial
fuels and to assist homeowners
in developing defensible space.

Fire Department,
Community
Development
Department,
Property Owners
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.
1-3 Years Planning HMGP / BRIC ,
AFG
Goal 3: Promote a fire
safe community.

Low ps-WF-CN12, ps-WFCN-12, psCC-CN-18,
ps-EW-CN39
ma-WF-CN-46 Wildfire NRP -
Natural
Resource
Protection
Pending 2021 City of
Napa
Coordinate watershed
protection efforts within the
Lake Hennessey and Lake
Milliken watersheds to protect
drinking water supplies from
water quality impacts.

Fire Dept. High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.

Ongoing Project HMGP / BRIC ,
Internal
Funding
Goal 4: Promote an
overall natural hazardsafe community. Goal 3:

Promote a fire safe
community.

High ps-WF-CN16
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 286 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
5-33
Mitigation No.

Hazard
Type
Mitigation
Type Status Year
Primary
Agency Title/Description Responsible Party Estimated Cost Estimated Benefit Time
Frame
HMA
Activity
Type
Potential Grant
Source Goal Priority
Related
Problem
Statements
ma-WF-CN-47 Wildfire SP -
Structural
Projects
Pending 2021 City of
Napa
Implement Lake Hennessy
Intake Pump Station
Defensible Space /Construction
Upgrade
Fire Dept.; Coord
with County and
other partners
High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
EMPG ,
Internal
Funding
Goal 3: Promote a fire
safe community.

High ps-WF-CN16, ps-CCCN-18
ma-WF-CN-48 Wildfire PPRO -
Property
Protection
Pending 2021 City of
Napa
Conduct Lake Hennessy
Pipeline Protection Project
Fire Dept; Utilities
Department
High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC ,
Internal
Funding
Goal 4: Promote an
overall natural hazardsafe community. Goal 3:

Promote a fire safe
community.

High ps-WF-CN16, ps-CCCN-18
ma-WF-CN-50 Wildfire PRV -
Prevention
Pending 2021 City of
Napa
Implement demonstration fuels
treatment and emergency
access project at Timberhill
Park
Fire Department High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project CalFIRE ,

HMGP / BRIC
Goal 3: Promote a fire
safe community.

Extreme ps-WF-CN15, ps-WFCN-14, psWF-CN-12,
ps-CC-CN18
ma-WF-CN-61 Wildfire ES -
Emergency
Services
Ongoing 2021 City of
Napa
Maintain Fire Access Roads
and evacuation routes that
have been identified throughout
the City of Napa.

City Council
(funding allocation);
Fire Department
Medium - The project could
be implemented with
existing funding but would
require a re-apportionment
of the budget or a budget
amendment, or the cost of
the project would have to be
spread over multiple years.

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.

Ongoing N/A Internal
Funding ,
CalFIRE
Goal 5: Create a more
disaster resilient
community. Goal 3:

Promote a fire safe
community.

Extreme ps-WF-CN12
ma-WF-CN-63 Wildfire PPRO -
Property
Protection
Pending 2021 City of
Napa
Fund and implement the
Milliken Raw Water Pipeline
Hardening Project
Utilities Department High - Existing funding will
not cover the cost of the
project; implementation
would require new revenue
through an alternative
source (for example, bonds,
grants, and fee increases).

High - Project will
provide an immediate
reduction of risk
exposure for life and
property.
3-5 Years Project HMGP / BRIC Goal 3: Promote a fire
safe community.

Extreme ps-WF-CN13
Note: As a living document, project descriptions and actions in the tables above will be modified to reflect current conditions over time in MAST. 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 287 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
5-34

INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 288 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
6-1
Section 6. Plan Implementation and Maintenance
It is important that this plan becomes a usable, used tool for all planning committee to ensure reductions in possible damage from a natural hazard event. This section discusses adopting, implementing, monitoring, evaluating, and updating the HMP, which should help ensure that the HMP remains relevant.

This section describes the incorporation of the HMP into existing planning mechanisms, and how the jurisdictions will continue to engage the public.

6.1 Plan Adoption
To comply with DMA 2000, the City of Napa Council has officially adopted the City of Napa Hazard Mitigation Plan. The adoption of the HMP recognizes the City’s commitment to reducing the impacts of natural hazards within the city. A copy of the HMP adoption resolution is included immediately following the Executive Summary.

6.2 Plan Implementation
Over time, implementation strategies for mitigation actions will become more detailed. MAST will be extremely useful to plan for updates to this HMP and to update individual mitigation actions as implemented or revised. In conjunction with the progress report processes, implementation strategy worksheets will be extremely useful as a plan of record tool for updates. Each implementation strategy worksheet provides individual steps and resources need to complete each priority mitigation action. The following are considerations for developing future implementation strategies:
▪ Use processes that already exist. Take advantage of the tools and procedures identified in the capability assessment in Section 5.3. Using planning mechanisms already in use and familiar to planning committee will give the planning implementation phase a strong initial boost. ▪ Updated work plans, policies, or procedure. Incorporating hazard mitigation concepts and activities can help integrate the HMP into daily operations. These changes can include how major development projects and subdivision reviews are addressed in hazard-prone areas or ensure that hazard mitigation concerns are considered in the approval of major capital improvement projects. ▪ Job descriptions. Working with department or agency heads to revise job descriptions of government staff to include mitigation-related duties, including designating a “mitigation lead” within a department, can further institutionalize hazard mitigation with little financial expenditure or programmatic overhaul.

6.2.1 Steering Committee
The Steering Committee oversaw the development of the plan and made recommendations on key elements of the plan, including the maintenance strategy. The Steering Committee recommended that an 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 289 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-2
oversight committee referred to herein as the HMP Steering Committee, should have an active role in the plan maintenance strategy. Therefore, it is recommended that the HMP Steering Committee become involved in key elements of the plan maintenance strategy. The new HMP Steering Committee should strive to include representation from the Planning Committee, as well as other stakeholder groups and members of the public in the planning area. Keeping this new HMP Steering Committee intact will also jump-start future updates.

The new HMP Steering Committee will develop annual progress reports to provide input to the City of Napa City Council on possible improvements or action steps to be considered at the next update. It will be the HMP Steering Committee’s role to create a report in an effort to identify revisions and issues needing to be addressed by future plans. These annual reports will also be released to the media and posted online for public review.

6.3 Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the HMP
This section describes the schedule and process for monitoring, evaluating, and updating the HMP. The Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST), has been developed as a primary resource for updating and monitoring mitigation actions. See subsection 6.3.2 below for more information on MAST.

6.3.1 Schedule
Monitoring the progress of the mitigation actions will be ongoing throughout the five-year period between the adoption of the HMP and the next update effort. The newly-formed HMP Steering Committee will meet biannually to monitor the implementation of mitigation actions and develop updates as necessary.

The HMP will be updated every five years, as required by DMA 2000. The update process will begin approximately 18 months prior to the expiration of the HMP. However, should a significant disaster occur within the city or impacting the city from the greater region, the HMP Steering Committee will reconvene within 30 days of the disaster to review and update the HMP as appropriate. The City Council will adopt written updates to the HMP as a DMA 2000 requirement.

6.3.2 Mitigation Action Support Tool (MAST) Updates
Hazard problem statements and mitigation activities will be updated through a web interface application developed specifically for the City of Napa, available on the project website, (http://mitigatehazards.com/napahmp/), to ensure this HMP remains a living document.

MAST is a web-based interactive tool that enables multiple users to search, view, enter, and update mitigation actions, ideas or projects, and other information. MAST provides participating jurisdiction staff and plan reviewers (Cal OES/FEMA) access to valuable mitigation information that can be leveraged by future planning or other risk reduction efforts. Users can update the status of their mitigation projects throughout the planning lifecycle and this web-based tool will improve participating jurisdiction’s ability 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 290 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
6-3
to apply for FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) grant programs including the initial grant application processes through Cal OES.

6.3.3 Process
The HMP Steering Committee will coordinate with responsible agencies/organizations identified for each mitigation action. These responsible agencies/organizations will monitor and evaluate the progress made on the implementation of mitigation actions and report to the HMP Steering Committee on an annual basis. These responsible departments will assess the effectiveness of the mitigation actions and modify them as appropriate. MAST will assist mitigation project managers in reporting on the status and assessing the effectiveness of the mitigation actions. Most updates to the HMP will occur easily through MAST.

Information from the mitigation leads within responsible departments will be used to monitor mitigation actions and annual evaluation of the HMP. The following questions will be considered in evaluating HMP effectiveness:
▪ Has the nature or magnitude of hazards affecting the City changed? ▪ Are there new hazards that have the potential to impact the City? ▪ Do the identified goals and actions address current and expected conditions? ▪ Have mitigation actions been implemented or completed? ▪ Has the implementation of identified mitigation actions resulted in expected outcomes? ▪ Are current resources adequate to implement the HMP?
▪ Should additional local resources be committed to address identified hazards? Future updates to the HMP will account for any new hazard vulnerabilities, special circumstances, or new information that becomes available. Issues that arise or updates made during monitoring and evaluating the HMP will be incorporated into the next update of the HMP in 2026. The questions identified above would remain valid during the preparation of the 2026 update.

6.3.4 Continuing Public Involvement
During the five-year update cycle, City staff will involve the public through public workshops and meetings. Information on upcoming public events related to the HMP or solicitation for comments will be announced via newspapers, mailings, and on the City HMP website (http://mitigatehazards.com/napahmp/). An electronic copy of the current HMP document will be accessible through the City website. The HMP Planning Committee will, as much as practicable, incorporate the following concepts into its public outreach strategy to ensure continued public involvement in the HMP planning process:
▪ Work with public service clubs, i.e., the Rotary Club of Napa, and the Napa Library. 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 291 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-4
▪ Collaborate with faith-based organizations, i.e., Napa Valley Community Church, Grace Church of Napa Valley, Napa Methodist Church, Congregation Beth Shalom, etc. ▪ Create story ideas for media outlets, such as newspapers, local radio, and TV ▪ Distribute emails and postcards/mailers to residents about hazard mitigation updates ▪ Post meeting announcements at City Halls, community centers, coffee houses, grocery stores, etc. ▪ Educate and collaborate with insurance companies.
▪ Participate in other existing local community meeting places, i.e., Napa Farmers Market, Napa Valley Arts in April, City of Napa Nights, etc.
▪ Distribute information through K-12 schools
▪ Continue to use the City website as a distribution point of hazard mitigation information

6.3.5 HMA Monitoring
FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Program is the catalyst that drives increased understanding and supports proactive community action to reduce losses from natural hazards. To support this vision, FEMA funds three grant programs under HMA. The three programs are the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Program, and Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) Program.
8 ▪ HMGP assists in implementing long-term hazard mitigation planning and projects following a Presidential major disaster declaration
▪ BRIC provides funds for hazard mitigation planning and projects on an annual basis ▪ FMA provides funds for planning and projects to reduce or eliminate risk of flood damage to buildings that are insured under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) on an annual basis.

HMGP funding is generally 15% of the total amount of Federal assistance provided to a State, Territory, or federally-recognized tribe following a major disaster declaration. BRIC and FMA funding depends on the amount congress appropriates each year for those programs. The HMGP supports cost-effective postdisaster projects and is the longest-running mitigation program among FEMA’s three grant programs. A 2017 study by the National Institute of Building Sciences’ (NIBS) Multihazard Mitigation Council has shown that every federal dollar spent on mitigation saves six dollars in response and recovery costs.

MAST will be extremely useful in applying for Cal OES funding. Plan maintenance will be primarily done through MAST. Figure 6-1 demonstrates how MAST information will translate into Cal OES NOIs and grant Sub application requests.
8 In August of 2020, the BRIC program replaced Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) grant program. 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 292 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
6-5
Figure 6-1: MAST and Cal OES Grant Applications
Following a disaster, California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) and local City of Napa officials in a joint effort with FEMA will perform Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDA) of the areas that sustained damage. Cal OES submits, through the FEMA Regional Office, the information collected along with a damage estimate to request a declaration from the President. A Presidential Major Disaster Declaration provides for the availability of HMGP funds at the request of a state’s Governor in eligible communities within a state, tribe, or territory. Figure 6-2 depicts this.

Figure 6-2 shows a timeline of how projects should be developed and administered by local government and FEMA under the HMGP program. HMGP grant recipients will have 36 months from the close of the application period to complete projects.
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 293 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-6
Figure 6-2: HMGP Timeline
For More information on HMGP project development process visit:
www.fema.gov/hazard-mitigation-grant-program-guide-state/local-governments

6.3.6 Incorporation into Other Planning Mechanisms
For the HMP to be successful, the recommendations and underlying principles of the HMP should be incorporated into community planning and development such as capital improvement budgeting, building and zoning codes, general plans and regional plans. Integration into a variety of departments at the City level provides an opportunity to network, identify, and highlight mitigation activities and opportunities at all levels of government. It is also important to monitor funding opportunities that can be leveraged to implement the mitigation actions.

Information from this HMP can be incorporated into:
▪ City of Napa General Plan: The HMP will provide information that can be incorporated into the Safety, Land Use, and Conservation Elements of the City’s General Plan as they are updated. In particular, the City may decide to update the Safety Element of the General Plan to incorporate the HMP in compliance with AB 2140. Specific risk and vulnerability information from the City of Napa HMP will assist in identifying areas where development may be at risk to potential hazards, which in turn can be incorporated into General Plans. For example, the City may want to consider instituting a hazard overlay zone that requires additional scrutiny because of close proximity to certain hazards.
▪ Climate Action Planning: The City intends to turn to updating climate action planning materials after it updates its General Plan. The HMP will be an important document for such an update, including mapping, vulnerability information, and mitigation actions that can be carried forward. ▪ Building / Development Codes and Zoning Ordinances: The HMP provides information to enable the City to make decisions on appropriate building/development codes and ordinances.

Appropriate building codes and ordinances can increase resilience against natural disasters. Some municipal mitigation actions directly recommend updates or new regulations as mitigation for 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 294 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
6-7
hazard risks; those mitigation actions indicate priorities for regulatory updates in participating jurisdictions.
▪ Community Wildfire Protection Plans (CWPP): The HMP will provide information that can be incorporated into future CWPP updates, and incorporated key information and projects from the recently-developed 2021 CWPP.
▪ Water/ Flood Management Plans: The HMP will provide information that can be included in updates to or the development of the Napa Valley Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan, Stormwater Management Plan, the Napa River Flood Management Plan, Napa Valley Drought Contingency Plan, the Urban Water Management Plan, and other water/ flood management plans.

While the process for updating these types of plans will vary by jurisdiction, the flood data developed for the HMP can be used in other mechanisms along with exposure and damage estimation information.

6.1.1 Planning Integration Processes
With adoption of this plan, the City of Napa and HMP Steering Committee will be responsible for the plan implementation and maintenance. The City and the HMP Steering Committee will continue to:
▪ Act as a forum for hazard mitigation issues,
▪ Disseminate hazard mitigation ideas and activities to City of Napa communities, ▪ Ensure hazard mitigation risk assessments and maps remain a consideration for safety decisionmakers,
▪ Report on plan progress and recommended changes, and
▪ Inform and solicit input from the public.
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 295 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
6-8

INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 296 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
7-1
Section 7. Works Cited
(2014). Retrieved from National Climate Assessment: https://nca2014.globalchange.gov/ ABAG. (2017). Plan Bay Area 2040: Projections 2040. Retrieved 08 24, 2021, from http://projections.planbayarea.org/data
Ackerly. (2018). San Francisco Bay Area Summaryy Report. Retrieved 01 21, 2021, from https://climateassessment.ca.gov/regions/
ALERTWildfire. (2021). ALERTWildfire "About". (D. G. University of Nevada, Editor) Retrieved 11 10, 2021, from http://www.alertwildfire.org/about.html
American Community Survey. (2013-2017). American Community Survey. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-kits/2018/acs-5year.html Association of Bay Area Governments. (2014, July 21). Napa County Earthquake Hazard. Retrieved from Association of Bay Area Governments Resilience Program:
http://resilience.abag.ca.gov/earthquakes/napa/
Balch, J. K., Bradley, B. A., Abatzoglou, J. T., Nagy, R. C., Fusco, E. J., & Mahood, A. L. (2017). Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States. PNAS, 114(11), 2946-2951. doi:10.1073/pnas.1617394114
Bay Area Council Economic Institute. (2019). City of Napa Economic Development Action Strategy. Napa.

Retrieved December 30, 2020, from https://www.cityofnapa.org/DocumentCenter/View/5398/2019- City-of-Napa-Economic-Development-Action-Strategy
Bay Area Council Economic Institute. (2019). City of Napa Economic Development Action Strategy.

Retrieved from https://www.cityofnapa.org/DocumentCenter/View/5398/2019-City-of-NapaEconomic-Development-Action-Strategy Bedsworth. (2018). Statewide Summary Report: California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

Retrieved 01 21, 2021, from https://www.climateassessment.ca.gov/state/ Billings, S. B., Gallagher, E., & Ricketts, L. (2019). Let the Rich Be Flooded: The Distribution of Financial Aid and Distress after Hurricane Harvey. SSRN.

Blume, H. (2019, 12 06). PG&E reaches $13.5-billion settlement with victims of devastating California wildfires. LA Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2019-12-06/pgesettlement-fire-northern-california 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 297 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-2
Brooks, R. (2021). After the Fires- Hydrophobic Soils. Retrieved from California Land Conservation Assistance Network: https://www.californialandcan.org/article/After-the-Fires--HydrophobicSoils/9 Cal Fire. (2018, September 3). Incident Information. Retrieved from Cal Fire:
http://cdfdata.fire.ca.gov/incidents/incidents_cur_search_results?search=napa&submit=Search CAL FIRE. (2019, Dec.). Wildland Urban Interface Map. Retrieved 11 16, 2021, from CAL FIRE/ FRAP:
https://frap.fire.ca.gov/media/10300/wui_19_ada.pdf
CAL Fire. (2020). LNU Lightning Complex (includes Hennessey, Gamble, 15-10, Spanish, Markley, 13-4, 11- 16, Walbridge). Retrieved from https://www.fire.ca.gov/incidents/2020/8/17/lnu-lightningcomplex-includes-hennessey-gamble-15-10-spanish-markley-13-4-11-16-walbridge/ CAL FIRE. (2021). Tree Mortality. Retrieved 11 16, 2021, from CAL FIRE FRAP: https://frap.fire.ca.gov/frapprojects/tree-mortality/ Cal OES. (2018). State of California Hazard Mitigation Plan. Retrieved from https://www.caloes.ca.gov/HazardMitigationSite/Documents/002- 2018%20SHMP_FINAL_ENTIRE%20PLAN.pdf#search=404
Cal OES. (2020). Dam Safety Planning Division. Retrieved from Cal OES: https://www.caloes.ca.gov/caloes-divisions/hazard-mitigation/dam-safety-planning-division Cal. Adaptation Planning Guide. (2020). Cal OES. Retrieved from https://www.caloes.ca.gov/HazardMitigationSite/Documents/CA-Adaptation-Planning-GuideFINAL-June-2020-Accessible.pdf Cal-Adapt. (2021). Extreme Heat Days and Warm Nights. Retrieved 03 10, 2021, from https://caladapt.org/tools/extreme-heat/ Cal-Adapt. (2021). Extreme Precipitation. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from https://cal-adapt.org/tools/extremeprecipitation/#lat=38.2854&lng=-122.0000&boundary=counties&climatevar=Precipitation California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. (2013‐2018). California Cooperative Wildland Fire Management and Stafford Act Response Agreement. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://gacc.nifc.gov/oscc/cwcg/docs/2013cfma/FinalCFMA2013-2018.pdf California Department of Public Health. (n.d.). Infectious Diseases by Disease, County, Year, and Sex.

Retrieved 12 05, 2021, from https://data.chhs.ca.gov/dataset/infectious-disease California Department of Water Resources. (2015). California's Most Significant Droughts. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from
https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/waterconditions/docs/California_Signficant_Droughts_2015_sm all.pdf
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 298 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
7-3
California Department of Water Resources. (2015). California's Most Significant Droughts: Comparing Historical and Recent Conditions.

California Department of Water Resources. (2020). California’s Most Significant Droughts: Comparing Historical and Recent Conditions. Retrieved from https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWRWebsite/Web-Pages/What-We-Do/Drought-Mitigation/Files/Publications-AndReports/a6022_CalSigDroughts19_v9_ay11.pdf (2010). California Drought Contingency Plan. California Department of Water Resources. Retrieved 05 14, 2020, from
https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/waterplan/docs/cwpu2013/Final/vol4/drought/01California_Dro ught_Contigency_Plan.pdf
California Employment Development Department. (2019). Agricultural Employment in California.

Retrieved 01 26, 2020, from Occupational Employment Statistics and Wages (OES) Employment and Wages: https://www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov/data/oes-employment-and-wages.html California Energy Commission. (2020). Retrieved from http://v1.cal-adapt.org/tools/factsheet/ California Fire. (2020). Red Flag Warning & Fire Weather Watches. Retrieved from https://www.fire.ca.gov/programs/communications/red-flag-warnings-fire-weather-watches/ California Legislative Information. (n.d.). Public Resources Code. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PRC&sectionNum= 4102.&article=1.&highlight=true&keyword=%EF%82%A7%09State%20Responsibility%20Areas%20 California Office of Emergency Services. (2018). California State Hazard Mitigation Plan. Retrieved from https://www.caloes.ca.gov/cal-oes-divisions/hazard-mitigation/hazard-mitigationplanning/state-hazard-mitigation-plan California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. (2019). Heat Related Mortality and Morbidity. Retrieved 04 02, 2021, from https://oehha.ca.gov/epic/impacts-biologicalsystems/heat-related-mortality-and-morbidity California Public Utilities Commission. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/deenergization/ California Seismic Safety Commission. (2002, July 11). Improving Natural Gas Safety in Earthquakes.

Retrieved from https://ssc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2020/08/cssc_2002- 03_natural_gas_safety.pdf
California Senate Office of Research. (2018). Climate Change and Health: Understanding How Global Warming Could Impact Public Health in California. Retrieved December 31, 2020, from https://sor.senate.ca.gov/sites/sor.senate.ca.gov/files/Public%20Health%20Climate%20Change%20 LINKS_4%201126.pdf
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 299 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-4
California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. (2018). Statewide Summary Report. Retrieved from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Statewide_Reports-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 013_Statewide_Summary_Report_ADA.pdf
CDC. (2013). Climate Change and Extrememe Heat Events. Center for Disease Control. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from
https://www.cdc.gov/climateandhealth/pubs/ClimateChangeandExtremeHeatEvents.pdf CDC. (2017). About Extreme Heat. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/heat_guide.html CDC. (2020, 07 21). CDC Mission. Retrieved from Center for Disease Control and Prevention:
https://www.cdc.gov/maso/pdf/cdcmiss.pdf
CDC. (2020, 07 31). Lyme Disease. Retrieved from Center for Disease Control:
https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/index.html
CDC. (2020). Mold After a Disaster. Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/mold/index.html
CDC. (2021). COVID-19 Pandemic Planning Scenarios. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html CDC. (2021, August). Delta Variant: What We Know About the Science. Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/delta-variant.html CDC. (2021). Extreme Heat. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from
https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/extremeheat/index.html
CDC. (n.d.). Measles (Rubeola). Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention:
https://www.cdc.gov/measles/index.html
CDWR. (2021). Urban Water Management Plans. Retrieved from Colorado Dept. of Water Resources:
https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Water-Use-And-Efficiency/Urban-Water-Use-Efficiency/UrbanWater-Management-Plans Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. (n.d.). Wildfires and Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.c2es.org/content/wildfires-and-climate-change/ Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Disease Burden of Influenza. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html#:~:text=CDC%20estimates%20that%20influenz a%20has,61%2C000%20deaths%20annually%20since%202010.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). 1918 Pandemic (H1N1 virus). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/1918-pandemic-h1n1.html 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 300 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
7-5
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021, September). Risk for COVID-19 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death by Race/Ethnicity. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/covid-data/investigationsdiscovery/hospitalization-death-by-race-ethnicity.html CGS. (2020). Seismic Shaking Hazard Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Pages/PSHA/shaking-assessment.aspx City and County of San Francisco Hazard Mitigation Plan. (2014). 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan.

City of Napa. (2015). General Plan. Retrieved 05 17, 2021, from https://www.cityofnapa.org/259/GeneralPlan City of Napa. (2015). Hazard Mitigation Plan. Retrieved from https://www.cityofnapa.org/DocumentCenter/View/5963/Hazard_Mitigation_Plan_2015?bidId= City of Napa. (2020). Napa Major Employers. Retrieved from https://www.cityofnapa.org/670/EconomicReports City of Napa. (n.d.). Fire Prevention Division. Retrieved from https://www.cityofnapa.org/665/Prevention City of Napa Hazard Mitigation Plan. (2015).

City of Napa. (n.d.). Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.cityofnapa.org/486/Sustainability CPUC. (2021). Fire-Threat Maps and Fire-Safety Rulemaking. Retrieved 11 16, 2021, from https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/wildfires/fire-threat-maps-and-fire-safetyrulemaking D. Branum, R. C. (2016). Earthquake Shaking Potential for California. CGS. Retrieved 04 07, 2020, from https://ssc.ca.gov/forms_pubs/shaking_18x23.pdf
Department of Environmental Conservation. (2020). State of Vermont. Retrieved from https://dec.vermont.gov/waste-management/spills
Domingue, S. J., & Emrich, C. T. (2019). Social Vulnerability and Procedural Equity: Exploring the Distribution of Disaster Aid Across Counties in the United States. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3).

DWR. (2019). Division of Safety of Dams. Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from https://water.ca.gov/Programs/AllPrograms/Division-of-Safety-of-Dams Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (2019). City of Napa Economic, Demographic, and Real Estate Profile.

Retrieved from
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b566dd931d4dff47aa7864a/t/5cbdfb25971a18245224998a/1 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 301 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-6
555954477078/City+of+Napa+Economic%2C+Demographic%2C+and+Real+Estate+Profile+4.2.19.pd f
EPA. (2021). Climate Change Indicators. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://www.epa.gov/climateindicators/weather-climate Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2019). Why Dams Fail. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/why-dams-fail
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. (2011). Dam Safety Program. Retrieved from https://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/gen-info/regulation/dam-safety.asp Federal Highway Administration. (2013). A Guide for Maintaining Pedestrian Facilities for Enhanced Safety. Retrieved 04 02, 2021, from
https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/fhwasa13037/chap3.cfm FEMA. (2020). Data Feeds. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/data-sets FEMA. (2020, 07 31). Types of Floods and Floodplains. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://training.fema.gov/hiedu/docs/fmc/chapter%202%20- %20types%20of%20floods%20and%20floodplains.pdf
FEMA. (2020). Wildland urban interface (WUI). Retrieved from https://www.usfa.fema.gov/wui/ FEMA. (2021, Feb. 11). Napa River Flood Protection Project: A "Living" River Concept. Retrieved from FEMA Mitigation Case Studies: https://www.fema.gov/case-study/napa-river-flood-protection-projectliving-river-concept Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2014). Direct and Indirect Effects of Sea-Level Rise. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/nr/climpag/pub/eire0047_en.asp Graham, B. a. (1988). Assessing the Threat to Life from Dam Failure. Water Resources Bulletin, 24(6).

Grantham, T. (2018). North Coast Summary Report, California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment.

University of California, Berkley. Retrieved 07 30, 2020, from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg_Report-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 001_NorthCoast_ADA.pdf
Grantham, Teodore; University of California, Berkeley. (2018). California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Reg_ReportSUM-CCCA4-2018-001_NorthCoast_ADA.pdf Groom, N. (2020, 04 15). Trump administration halts wildfire prevention tool in California over coronavirus. Reuters. Retrieved 07 29, 2020, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 302 of 416 CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
7-7
coronavirus-usa-wildfires/trump-administration-halts-wildfire-prevention-tool-in-californiaover-coronavirus-idUSKCN21X1HD Harvard School of Public Health. (2021, Aug. 13). Press Release: Wildfire smoke may have contributed to thousands of extra COVID-19 cases and deaths in western U.S. in 2020. Retrieved from https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/wildfire-smoke-may-have-contributed-tothousands-of-extra-covid-19-cases-and-deaths-in-western-u-s-in-2020/ Howell, J., & Elliot, J. R. (2019). Damages Done: The Longitudinal Impacts of Natural Hazards on Wealth Inequality in the United States. Social Problems, 66(3), 448-467.

Hu, J. C. (2020, 07 24). COVID-19 is complicating Seattle's response to wildfire smoke. High Country News.

Retrieved 07 29, 2020, from https://www.hcn.org/articles/north-covid-19-is-complicating-seattlesresponse-to-wildfire-smoke Johns Hopkins University of Medicine. (2021). Coronavirus Resource Center. Retrieved from https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/#covid-19-basics
Krause, E., & Reeves, R. (2017, Sept. 18). Hurricans hit the poor the hardest. Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from Brookings Institute: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/social-mobilitymemos/2017/09/18/hurricanes-hit-the-poor-the-hardest/ Lareau, N. P., Nauslar, N. J., & Abatzoglou, J. T. (2018). The Carr Fire Vortex: A Case of Pyrotornadogenesis? Geophysical Research Letters, 45(13), 13107-13115.

Leah Fisher, Sonya Ziaja. (2018). California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019-11/Statewide_Reports-SUM-CCCA4-2018- 013_Statewide_Summary_Report_ADA.pdf
Levin, Phil; Davies, Ian. (2019, Nov. 6). Racial and Ethnic Minorities are More Vulnerable to Wildfires.

Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from The Conversation: http://theconversation.com/racial-and-ethnicminorities-are-more-vulnerable-to-wildfires-106290 Lutz, H. (2018, February 21). Napa grapegrowers brace for extended frost season, with little rain. Retrieved from Napa Valley Register: https://napavalleyregister.com/news/local/napa-grapegrowers-bracefor-extended-frost-season-with-little-rain/article_74a4eca7-b723-5ebd-abdf-61a2ba7e4958.html Mayo Clinic. (n.d.). Measles. Retrieved from Mayo Clinic: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseasesconditions/measles/symptoms-causes/syc-20374857 Morris, G. (2021). 2020 Fire Siege. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

Napa City Website. (2021). High Performance Building Regulations. Retrieved 08 2021, 24, from https://www.cityofnapa.org/579/High-Performance-Building-Regulations 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 303 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-8
Napa County. (2014). Napa County Wildland Fire Background Report. Retrieved from https://www.countyofnapa.org/DocumentCenter/View/3288/Wildland-Fire-BackgroundInformation-August-2014-PDF Napa County. (2016). Napa Valley Groundwater Sustainability: A Basin Analysis Report for the Napa Valley Subbasin. Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting. Retrieved from https://www.napawatersheds.org/managed_files/Document/8266/Napa%20Valley%20Subbasin%2 0Basin%20Analysis%20Report_2016_sm.pdf
Napa County. (2021). Coronavirus (COVID-19). Retrieved 05 12, 2021, from https://www.countyofnapa.org/2739/Coronavirus-COVID-19
(2018). Napa County Climate Action Plan. Retrieved from https://www.countyofnapa.org/DocumentCenter/View/9247/Revised-Draft-CAP-PDF National Center for Disaster Preparedness. (2020). Vulnerable Populations. Retrieved 01 24, 2020, from https://ncdp.columbia.edu/research/vulnerable-populations/ National Institute of Building Sciences. (2017). Publications. Retrieved from https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1516812817859-
9f866330bd6a1a93f54cdc61088f310a/MS2_2017InterimReport.pdf National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research. (2016). Drought. Retrieved from https://niwa.co.nz/education-and-training/schools/students/drought National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration . (2020). What are El Niño and La Niña? Retrieved from National Ocean Service: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/ninonina.html National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (n.d.). Is Sea Level Rising. Retrieved from https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/sealevel.html
National Park Service. (2018). Wildfire Causes and Evaluations. Retrieved from https://www.nps.gov/articles/wildfire-causes-andevaluation.htm#:~:text=Humans%20and%20Wildfire,and%20intentional%20acts%20of%20arson.

National Research Council. (2012). Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington:

Past, Present, and Future. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/catalog/13389/sea-level-rise-forthe-coasts-of-california-oregon-and-washington National Weather Service. (n.d.). Red Flag Warning. Retrieved August 2020, from https://www.weather.gov/mqt/redflagtips#:~:text=A%20Red%20Flag%20Warning%20means,increa sed%20risk%20of%20fire%20danger.&text=%2DExtinguish%20all%20outdoor%20fires%20properly,i s%20cold%20to%20the%20touch.
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 304 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
7-9
Nix, J. (2017, Oct. 25). 42 Dead, 8,400 Structures Burned, More Than $1 Billion in Damage: the Devastating Toll of California’s Wildfires. Retrieved from Mother Jones:
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2017/10/california-fires-damage-total/ NOAA. (2017). Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States. Silver Spring, Maryland.

Retrieved 07 27, 2020, from
https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/techrpt83_Global_and_Regional_SLR_Scenarios_ for_the_US_final.pdf
NOAA. (2018). Ask the scientist: How can the weather spark and spread wildfires? Retrieved from https://www.noaa.gov/stories/ask-scientist-how-can-weather-spark-and-spread-wildfires NOAA. (2021). Storm Events Database. Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from National Centers for Environmental Information:
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/listevents.jsp?eventType=%28Z%29+Flood&beginDate_ mm=01&beginDate_dd=01&beginDate_yyyy=2000&endDate_mm=01&endDate_dd=31&endDate_yy yy=2021&county=NAPA%3A55&hailfilter=0.00&tornfilter=0&windfilter=000&sort=DT&submitbutto NOAA. (2021). Tides and Currents. Retrieved 05 10, 2021, from https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/waterlevels.html?id=9414290 Office of the State Fire Marshal. (2021). Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/divisions/wildfire-planning-engineering/wildfire-preventionengineering/fire-hazard-severity-zones/ OPR Planning and Investing for a Resilient California. (n.d.). A Guidebook for State Agencies. 19. Retrieved from https://opr.ca.gov/docs/20180313-Building_a_Resilient_CA.pdf Pacific Northwest Seismic Network. (n.d.). Ground Motion. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://pnsn.org/outreach/earthquakehazards/ground-motion Peterson, D. A., Fromm, M. D., McRae, R. H., Campbell, J. R., Hyer, E. J., Taha, G., . . . Deland, M. T. (2021).

Australia’s Black Summer pyrocumulonimbus super outbreak reveals potential for increasingly extreme stratospheric smoke events. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 4(38).

R. Dean Hardy, Mathew E. Hauer. (2018). Social vulnerability projections improve sea-level rise risk assessments. Retrieved 08 29, 2021, from https://mathewhauer.github.io/papers/2018- AppliedGeographerHardyHauer.pdf
Ready. (2021). Extreme Heat. Retrieved 04 01, 2021, from Ready:
https://www.ready.gov/heat#:~:text=Extreme%20heat%20is%20a%20period,which%20can%20lead %20to%20death.
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 305 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-10
Rodriguez, B., Lareau, N. P., Kingsmill, D. E., & Clements, C. B. (2020). Extreme Pyroconvective Updrafts During a Megafire. Geophysical Research Letteres, 47(18).

San Francisco Department of Emergency Management. (2019). Communicable Diseases. Retrieved from SF72: https://www.sf72.org/hazard/communicable-diseases Scripps Institution of Oceanography . (2018). Climate, Drought, and Sea Level Rise Scenarios For California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment. State of California Energy Commission. (2012). Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington.

Seismic Safety Commission. (2009). The Field Act and its Relative Effectiveness in. Retrieved from ssc.ca.gov: https://ssc.ca.gov/forms_pubs/cssc_09-02_the_field_act_report_appendices.pdf Syphard, A. A., Rustigian-Romsos, H., Mann, M., Conlisk, E., Moritz, M. A., & Ackerly, D. (2019). The relative influence of climate and housing development on current and projected future fire patterns and structure loss across three California landscapes. Global Environmental Change, 56, 41-55.

The National Severe Storms Laboratory. (2020, 07 31). SEVERE WEATHER 101. Retrieved May 17, 2020, from https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/floods/types/ The National Severe Storms Laboratory. (n.d.). Severe Weather 101 - Damaging Winds. Retrieved May 17, 2020, from https://www.nssl.noaa.gov/education/svrwx101/wind/types/ U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2016). Public Health Emergency. Retrieved from https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/abc/Pages/afn-guidance.aspx U.S. Dep't of Ag. (2017). Hired Farm Labor, Workers and Payroll. Retrieved 01 26, 2020, from USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service:
https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/CDQT/chapter/2/table/7/state/CA/county/055/year/2017 U.S. Fire Administration. (2020, 06 11). National guidance for COVID-19 wildfire response released. FEMA website. Retrieved 07 27, 2020, from
https://www.usfa.fema.gov/operations/infograms/061120.html U.S. Geological Survey. (1985). Floods from Dam Failures. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.

Retrieved 05 08, 2020, from https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1985/0560/report.pdf United States Army Corps of Engineers. (n.d.). Huntington District Dam Safety Program. Retrieved from https://www.lrh.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Dam-Safety-Program/ United States Census Bureau. (2017). ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates. Retrieved from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?tid=ACSDP5Y2017.DP05 United States Census Bureau. (2019). Median Household Income. Retrieved 04 02, 2020, from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=kern%20median%20household%20income&tid=ACSST1Y2 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 306 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
7-11
015.S1901&t=Income%20%28Households,%20Families,%20Individuals%29%3AHousehold%20and%2 0Family
United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). Fire Effects on the Environment. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/page/fire-effects-environment United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Climate Impacts on Agriculture and Food Supply.

Retrieved from https://19january2017snapshot.epa.gov/climate-impacts/climate-impactsagriculture-and-food-supply_.html United States Fire Administration. (2020). Current events/issues affecting the fire and emergency services. Retrieved from https://www.usfa.fema.gov/current_events/ United States Forest Service. (n.d.). Prescribed Fire. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/prescribed-fire
United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). M6.0 South Napa, California Earthquake -August 24, 2014.

Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/m60-southnapa-california-earthquake-august-24-2014?qt-science_center_objects=0#qtscience_center_objects United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). Rain and Precipitation. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/special-topic/water-science-school/science/rain-and-precipitation?qtscience_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/modified-mercalliintensity-scale?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). The Pacific Coastal Fog Project. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.usgs.gov/centers/wgsc/science/pacific-coastal-fog-project?qtscience_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). The Science of Earthquakes. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World: https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquakehazards/science/science-earthquakes?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects United States Geological Survey. (n.d.). What Are the Long Term Effects of Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-are-long-term-effects-climate-change-1?qtnews_science_products=0#qt-news_science_products University of California, Davis Center for Watershed Sciences. (2020). Projects and Research Programs.

Retrieved from https://watershed.ucdavis.edu/
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 307 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-12
US Department of Energy. (2019). Extreme Weather and Climate Vulnerabilities of the Electric Grid.

Retrieved 04 02, 2021, from
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/09/f67/Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Laboratory%20 EIS%20Response.pdf
US EPA. (2020). Green Infrastructure. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/green-infrastructure/manageflood-risk USGS. (2016). Effects of Urban Development on Floods. Retrieved from US Geological Survey Science for a Changing World: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs07603/
USGS. (2020). 2018 United States (Lower 48) Seismic Hazard Long-term Model. Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/2018-united-states-lower48-seismic-hazard-long-term?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects USGS. (2020). Increases in Wildfire-Caused Erosion Could Impact Water Supply and Quality in the West.

Retrieved from https://www.usgs.gov/news/increases-wildfire-caused-erosion-could-impactwater-supply-and-quality-west-2 USGS. (n.d.). Earthquake Hazards 201 - Technical Q&A. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World: https://137.227.224.120/hazards/learn/technical.php#accel USGS. (n.d.). The Science of Earthquakes. Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World: https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/science/scienceearthquakes?qt-science_center_objects=0#qt-science_center_objects USGS. (n.d.). What is liquefaction? Retrieved May 15, 2020, from USGS Science for a Changing World:
https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-liquefaction?qt-news_science_products=0#qtnews_science_products Water Education Foundation. (2020). Oroville Dam: Aquapedia Background. Retrieved Jan. 30, 2020, from Aquapedia: https://www.watereducation.org/aquapedia/oroville-dam Werth, P. A., Potter, B. E., Clements, C. B., Finney, M. A., Goodrick, S. L., Alexander, M. E., . . . McAllister, S. S. (2016). Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers. Seattle:

United States Department of Agriculture.

Western Regional Climate Center. (2020). Climate of California. Retrieved from https://wrcc.dri.edu/Climate/narrative_ca.php
Wiebold, B. (2007). Flood Effects on Grain Crops. Retrieved from University of Missouri Extension:
https://extension.missouri.edu/publications/agw1014
World Health Organization. (2020). Novel Coronavirus – Japan (ex-China). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/csr/don/16-january-2020-novel-coronavirus-japan-ex1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 308 of 416 CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
7-13
china/en/#:~:text=Coronaviruses%20are%20a%20large%20family,COVID19%2Fcoronavirus%20dise ase.

World Health Organization-China Joint Mission. (2020). Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-1). Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/19162/Downloads/who-chinajoint-mission-on-covid-19---final-report-1100hr-28feb2020-11mar-update.pdf Yana S. Valachovic et al. (2011). Sudden Oak Death-caused Changes to Surface Fuel Loading and Potential Fire Behavior in Douglas-fir-tanoak Forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 1973-1986. 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 309 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
7-14

INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 310 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-1
A
Appendix A. Analysis Methodology
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 311 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-2
A GIS-based vulnerability assessment was conducted for each of the priority hazards identified by the Planning Committee. Several sources of data are necessary to conduct a vulnerability analysis. This appendix presents an outline of the data inputs, processing steps, and outputs used to create the vulnerability analysis results presented in the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The analysis methodology is presented first, followed by an overview of the analysis data.

A.1. Natural Hazard Exposure
The natural hazard exposure analysis (see C. Natural Hazard Exposure in Figure A-4) is an inventory of population, parcels, critical facilities, and other assets within each natural hazard area. As shown in Figure A-1, the presence of a structure inside a natural hazard area (the flood zone in this example) qualifies that structure as exposed to the natural hazard.

Figure A-1: Hazard Exposure
The total counts of parcels, people, facilities, assets and the sum of values within the planning area which could be exposed to a hazard event is referred to as the “exposure” in this plan. A natural hazards overlay was developed to reflect the combination of many known natural hazard spatial footprints. The spatial overlay method enables summarization of building values, parcel counts, population exposure, and critical facility exposure within a hazard’s geographic extents (see C. Natural Hazard Exposure in Figure A-4). The input data is used to evaluate exposure for earthquakes, flooding, dam inundation, and wildfire.

Damage Estimation with Hazus
FEMA’s Hazus software was implemented to conduct a detailed loss estimation for flood, earthquake, and dam inundation. Hazus is a nationally applicable standardized methodology that contains models for estimating potential losses from earthquakes, floods, and hurricanes. Hazus uses Geographic Information Systems (GIS) technology to estimate physical, economic, and social impacts of disasters. For purposes of this planning effort, Hazus was used to generate damage estimations due to possible earthquakes, flooding, and dam inundation depths. The estimated damage and losses provided by the Hazus Software 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 312 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-3
provide the ability to understand possible widescale damage to buildings and facilities (see D. Hazus Damage Estimations in Figure A-4).

In the hypothetical geography shown in Figure A-3, even though both structures are exposed to flooding, it is expected that the structure with a first floor height below the depth of flooding will receive significantly more damage than the structure with a first floor height above the expected water depth.

Note that not all building data contains first floor height and first floor height is an example of the type of field utilized by Hazus in calculating damage estimates.

Figure A-2: Flood Depth and Damage Curves
Figure A-3: Hazus Damage Estimations
Hazus is a FEMA product with highly detailed documentation provided on the analysis steps and algorithms performed against the input data and associated scenarios in the process of obtaining loss 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 313 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-4
estimates. The explanation in this appendix section is simplified. Refer to the full documentation and technical manuals from FEMA for greater explanation on Hazus specifics.

Distinguishing Results – Natural Hazard Exposure Analysis vs Hazus Results Table and chart references throughout the hazard mitigation plan are explicitly called out for Hazus results as “Damage Estimates”. There are expected differences in the results between estimations of Natural Hazard overlays and detailed Hazus results. Snapshot tables and Natural Hazard Exposure sections do not contain Hazus estimates.

A.2. Analysis Data
Assets, Value, and Population
A.2.1.1. Parcels
County-provided parcel geometry was joined with county assessor data. Provided address points were utilized to add accuracy to the analysis. Where multiple points were present on a given parcel, the values were normalized by the number of points in the parcel. Where building area attribution was available, a replacement cost of $300 per square foot was used as a basis for cost value. Where building area attribution was not available, assessed building values were utilized. Fields required by Hazus that were not present in the parcel data provided were given default values based on the mapped use-codes of each parcel.

Earthquake building design level attribution was based on year built (where the default was 1972) and building code adaptation chronology.

A.2.1.2. Asset Insurance Schedules
The city insurance schedule was used in developing Real Property Asset data with valuations and structural data for analyses. The city owned assets were utilized in Hazus as well as exposure analyses.

The tabular data were geocoded and quality checked for building placement. These data are presented in the exposure analysis as “Real Property Assets” and in Hazus results as appropriate general use code type or specific building location description.

A.2.1.3. Population
Population estimates were derived from 2013-2017 5-year Census American Community Survey (ACS) numbers as applied to Census block groups and Census Place geographies, then processed through GIS modeling in order to break down the proportional population for smaller units of area in relation to natural hazards.
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 314 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-5
A.2.1.4. Critical Infrastructure
Critical facilities and transportation/lifeline typically include hospitals, fire stations, police stations, storage of critical records, and similar facilities. These data came from a collection of sources including but not limited to: County GIS and City insurance data, CDSS, CEC, FCC, Hazus, USACE, FEMA, and NPS. All data sources have a level of accuracy acceptable for planning purposes. See Table A-1 for a list of Critical Infrastructure data used in the analysis.

A.2.1.5. Hazus Inputs
Hazus data inputs include hazard scenario data and detailed building data. The GIS team conducted a Level 2 analysis utilizing user-defined buildings with refined building characteristic parameters as inputs for the damage estimation calculations (See A.2.1.1 and A.2.1.2). Both countywide building data and government assets were used as inputs in this level 2 analysis. The customized user defined building dataset allows for more accurate results for damage estimation based upon detailed building characteristics.

Note: FEMA’s Hazus software utilizes different user defined building information inputs to develop loss estimates depending on the hazard module. The Hazus flood and earthquake modules use fragility curves based upon the user’s definition of building characteristics including but not limited to:
• Area
• Year Built
• Construction Type
• Number of Stories
• EQ Design Level
• Occupancy Type (Residential, Government, etc)
• Building Values
Defaults were used for missing fields and values based on use-code and other available information for that input.

Natural Hazard Data
A.2.2.1. Dam Inundation Zones
Dam inundation zone GIS data were provided by Cal OES and DWR. These represent the estimated flood extent in the event of dam failure for individual dams. Those dams from DWR include Conn Creek, Milliken, and Rector Creek.

Hazard Description
Inundation Area
CalOES and DWR dam inundation maps show the maximum extent of damage of a flood wave emanating from a dam failure. Dam Inundation maps for the State of California are required by California Government Code Section 8589.5(b).

Source: DWR, Cal OES
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 315 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-6
A.2.2.2. Dam Inundation Depth Grids
Flooding depth grids of dam inundation events is provided by DWR. The inundation depth grids used for this project include Conn Creek, Milliken, and Rector Creek site specific studies.

A.2.2.3. Earthquake Shaking
The CGS 2 percent chance – 50-yr probability map was used as a qualitative guide in selecting an earthquake epicenter based shakemap scenario for analyses in conjunction with the Countywide MJHMP use of shakemaps. The M6.7 West Napa earthquake shakemap scenario from USGS was used in both exposure and damage estimate analyses.

Intensity MMI Description/Damage
I-Not felt 0-1 Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable conditions.

II-Weak 1-2 Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings.

III-Weak 2-3
Felt quite noticeably by persons indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings. Many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing motor cars may rock slightly. Vibrations similar to the passing of a truck.

Duration estimated.

IV-Light 3-4
Felt indoors by many, outdoors by few during the day. At night, some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make cracking sound.

Sensation like heavy truck striking building. Standing motor cars rocked noticeably.

V-Moderate 4-5
Felt by nearly everyone; many awakened. Some dishes, windows broken.

Unstable objects overturned. Pendulum clocks may stop.

VI-Strong 5-6
Felt by all, many frightened. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster. Damage slight.

VII-Very strong 6-7
Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; considerable damage in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken.

VIII-Severe 7-8
Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable damage in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse. Damage great in poorly built structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls. Heavy furniture overturned.

IX-Violent 8-9
Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb. Damage great in substantial buildings, with partial collapse. Buildings shifted off foundations.

X-Extreme 9-10 Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations. Rails bent.

Source: USGS Scenario MMI Grid
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 316 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-7
A.2.2.4. Flood Zones
The input parameters for Hazus analysis of Flood exposure included depth grids created with the FEMA Flood Zone data mentioned in section A.2.2.4. 100-YR and 500-YR were scenarios that were used to analyze the exposure to inputs as depicted in Figure A-4.

Hazard Flood Zone Description
100-YR Floodway
[SFHA] Subtype: Floodway
A "Regulatory Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. Communities must regulate development in these floodways to ensure that there are no increases in upstream flood elevations.
100-YR Flood Fringe
[SFHA]
SFHA outside
Floodway
The land area covered by the floodwaters of the base flood is the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) on NFIP maps. The SFHA is the area where the National Flood Insurance Program's (NFIP's) floodplain management regulations must be enforced and the area where the mandatory purchase of flood insurance applies.
500-YR Flood
[non-SFHA]
Subtypes: 0.2%
Annual Chance,
Protected by Levee
Moderate risk areas within the 0.2-percent-annual-chance floodplain, areas of 1-percent-annual-chance flooding where average depths are less than 1 foot, areas of 1-percent-annual-chance flooding where the contributing drainage area is less than 1 square mile, and areas protected from the 1- percent-annual-chance flood by a levee. No BFEs or base flood depths are shown within these zones.

Source: FEMA MSC DFIRM
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 317 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-8
A.2.2.5. Sea-level rise
GIS layer depicting boundaries of estimated sea level rise from 1-6ft above the current Mean Higher High Water conditions. This data is provided by ABAG and NOAA.

Hazard Native Class Description
0 - FT
0'
Sea level rise from 0 to 1 foot above Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) [98% probability by year 2100]
1 - FT
1'
Sea level rise from 0 to 1 foot above Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) [98% probability by year 2100]
2 - FT 2'
Sea level rise from 1 foot to 2 feet above MHHW [73% probability by year 2100]
3 - FT
3'
Sea level rise from 2 feet to 3 feet above MHHW [3% probability by year 2100] 4 - FT
4'
Sea level rise from 3 feet to 5 feet above MHHW [0.5% probability by year 2100]
5 - FT 5'
Sea level rise from 5 feet to 7 feet above MHHW [0.1% probability by year 2100]
6 - FT
6'
Sea level rise greater than or equal to 8 feet above MHHW [0.05% probability by year 2100]
Source: Association of Bay Area Governments
These data depict the potential inundation of coastal areas resulting from a projected 1 to 6 feet rise in sea level above current Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) conditions.
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 318 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-9
A.2.2.6. Wildfire Hazard Severity
A proprietary DP+S composite GIS layer derived from Wildland-urban interfaces, California Public Utilities Commission fire threat areas and Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

Hazard Native Class Description
Moderate
Tier 1 HHZs are zones in direct proximity to communities, roads, and utility lines, and are a direct threat to public safety. 1 WUI is the potential treatment zone in which projects could be conducted to reduce wildland fire threats to people.
1 / Moderate See Cal Fire FHSZ (State Responsibility Area [SRA] & Local Responsibility Area [LRA])
High
Tier 2
Tier 2 fire-threat areas depict areas where there is an elevated risk (including likelihood and potential impacts on people and property) from utility associated wildfires.

High See Cal Fire FHSZ (State Responsibility Area [SRA] & Local Responsibility Area [LRA])
Very High
Tier 3
Tier 3 fire-threat areas depict areas where there is an extreme risk (including likelihood and potential impacts on people and property) from utility associated wildfires.

Very High
Classification of a zone as moderate, high or very high fire hazard is based on a combination of how a fire will behave and the probability of flames and embers threatening buildings. Each area of the map gets a score for flame length, embers, and the likelihood of the area burning. Scores are then averaged over the zone areas. Final zone class (moderate, high and very high) is based on the averaged scores for the zone.

Source: Moderate - Cal Fire Tree Mortality, WUI, FHSZ; High - CPUC Utility Threat, Cal Fire FHSZ; Very High - High - CPUC Utility Threat, Cal Fire FHSZ (SRA & LRA)
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 319 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-10
Methodology Overview
Figure A-4: Data Analysis Methodology
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 320 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-11
Data Dictionary
Table A-1: Data Dictionary
Dataset Data Steward Notes
Napa Census Census TIGER County boundary - Cartographic Napa City City Updated with council districts
Napa County County County Boundary
GNIS Census Cartographic Basemap
Water Esri Cartographic Basemap - may need supplemental water lines layer
River Esri Cartographic Basemap
Address Point Locations County From county GIS - See Notes from county plan Building Outlines County From county GIS
Parcel Geometry County From county GIS
Parcel Roll County Assessors Used $300 /sqft replacement and where no area available utilized assessed improvement value
Emergency Operations
Center County The EOC falls outside of city limits and within County Jurisdiction Fire County, Insurance
Roll CDSS likely most complete source
Hospital Hazus From Hazus dataset
Police County, Insurance
Roll
This is a consolidated layer of law enforcement
provided by local jurisdiction
Adult Res Facility CDSS As defined by California Department of Social Services
Child Care Center CDSS, Insurance
Roll Some from Local Insurance Roll
Church County Places of Worship
Communication Tower Local Insurance
Roll Geocoded from insurance roll
Dam County Dam locations - does not include all agricultural dams
Farm Worker Housing County Farm Working Housing
Foster Family Agency CDSS As defined by California Department of Social Services
Historic Building NPS, Insurance
Roll Historic Building Registry
Home Care Organization CDSS As defined by California Department of Social Services
Insured Asset Insured Building
Tables Represented as "Real Property Asset"
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 321 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-12
Dataset Data Steward Notes
Library County, Insurance
Roll Some from Local Insurance Roll
Mobile Home Park County Provided by county
Res Child Care CDSS As defined by California Department of Social Services
Res Elder Care Facility CDSS As defined by California Department of Social Services
School County
School locations are expensive assets that are
often occupied with children but also can be safe
and useful shelters
Stream Rain Gauges Napa Watershed
Org Obtained from Napa Watershed Org
Water Treatment Plant Water Division Includes both water treatment and waste water treatment
Airport County From county but out of city boundary.

Bridge County Bridge locations
Levee FEMA Levee locations
Levee Centerline USACE NLD Levee Centerline locations
Levee Flood Wall USACE NLD Levee Floodwall locations
NG Pipeline CEC Natural Gas Pipeline
Power Plant CEC Power plants including some generators
Pressure Regulator
Station Water Division Obtained from Water Division GDB Pump Station Water Division Obtained from Water Division GDB Railroad Esri Industrial, commercial or tourist
Sample Station Water Division Obtained from Water Division GDB Street Esri Streets with road sub categories for summaries Substation CEC Power Substations
Transmission Line CEC Power Transmission Lines
Water Tank Water Division Obtained from Water Division GDB Water transmission Line Water Division Obtained from Water Division GDB Census Block US Census Bureau Census Tiger geometry
Census Block Group US Census Bureau Adjusted with 2017 ACS demographics report Census Place US Census Bureau Census Tiger geometry and ACS 2017 5-year estimates
Census Tract US Census Bureau Census Tiger geometry and ACS 2017 5-year estimates
Dam Inundation Cal OES, DWR Consolidated county, CalOES, and DWR Conn Creek, Rector, Milliken
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 322 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-13
Dataset Data Steward Notes
EQ Scenarios 1-X USGS, CISN West Napa Scenario
Flood Hazard FEMA Regional study from FEMA
Landslide Susceptibility CGS Low medium and high classifications Sea Level Rise ABAG Rise levels from 0-6'
Wildfire Hazard Cal Fire / CPUC Composite fire layer: Fire Threat CPUC, Tree Mortality, WUI, FHSZ
EQ Fault Zones CGS Locally obtained
Shake Potential USGS, CISN Utilized in scenario selection Fire Perimeter Calfire NIFC Statewide for burn perimeters 2000-2021 (Geomac Archive and new NIFC)
Fire Regime MFRI USGS https://www.landfire.gov/NationalProductDescrip tions13.php
Qfaults USGS Locally Obtained
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 323 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-14
Insured Assets Roll
Table A-2: Insured Asset Roll
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total
Corp Yard 2 $61,508 $2 $61,510
3 Canopy Veh Shelters, City Corporation Yard 1 $27,929 $1 $27,930 Pressure Wash Port, City Corporation Yard 1 $33,579 $1 $33,580 Equipment 5 $295,985 $34,711 $330,696
3 Vehicle Storage, City Corporation Yard 1 $50,801 $5,786 $56,587 Contractor'S Equipment 1 $1 $1 $2
Landscape Equipment, Fuller Park 1 $156,731 $28,922 $185,653 Vehicle Storage I, City Corporation Yard 1 $88,451 $1 $88,452 Vehicles 1 $1 $1 $2
Fire 7 $13,271,585 $1,213,351 $14,484,936
Fire Station #1, City Of Napa 1 $2,398,090 $422,528 $2,820,618 Fire Station #2, City Of Napa 1 $1,052,270 $70,421 $1,122,691 Fire Station #2-Training Tower, City Of Napa 1 $485,316 $14,085 $499,401 Fire Station #3, City Of Napa 1 $1,593,360 $347,056 $1,940,416 Fire Station #4, City Of Napa 1 $3,019,930 $345,443 $3,365,373 Fire Station #5, Fire Station 5 Site 1 $4,649,780 $1 $4,649,781 Storage Bldg, Fire Station No.4 1 $72,839 $13,817 $86,656 Library 1 $2,602,390 $57,841 $2,660,231
Goodman Library/Napa Historical Society Building, City Of Napa 1 $2,602,390 $57,841 $2,660,231 Misc 9 $10,014,577 $1,492,133 $11,506,710
Canopy, Senior Center 2 $266,040 $2 $266,042
Clean Materials Recovery Facility., City Of Napa 1 $3,174,490 $173,527 $3,348,017 Clubhouse (1) (South House), City Of Napa 1 $304,937 $1 $304,938 Clubhouse (2), City Of Napa 1 $285,878 $1 $285,879
Community Development Department, City Of Napa 1 $4,428,440 $1,056,320 $5,484,760 Housing Authority Of The City Of Napa: Lincoln 1 $1 $1 $2 Housing Authority/Materials Diversion & Recycling, City Of Napa 1 $1,554,790 $261,156 $1,815,946
Shop And Stop, Housing Authority Of The City Of Napa: Laurel 6 1 $1 $1,125 $1,126 Storage 2 $95,596 $72,156 $167,752
Garage/Storage Building 1 $82,293 $70,421 $152,714
Hazmat Storage, City Corporation Yard 1 $13,303 $1,735 $15,038 Water 18 $43,064,168 $1,559,208 $44,623,376
1 Mg (Welded Steel) Montana "B" Tank", City Of Napa Water Division 1 $1,435,060 $1 $1,435,061
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 324 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-15
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total
2Mg (Welded Steel) " C" Water Storage Tank", City Of Napa Water Division 1 $2,652,960 $1 $2,652,961
32000 Gallon (Bolted Steel) Hagen Oaks Water Tank, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $102,645 $1 $102,646
4 Mg Welded Steel Water Reservoir #2, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $4,020,820 $1 $4,020,821
4 Mg Welded Steel Water Reservoir, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $4,020,820 $1 $4,020,821 5 Mg Lakeview Reservoir, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $1 $1 $2 5Mg (Welded Steel) Imola Avenue Water Tank, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $4,703,930 $1 $4,703,931
5Mg Lakeview Reservoir (Buried), City Of Napa Water Division 1 $6,627,820 $1 $6,627,821 Alta Heights I, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $215,090 $1 $215,091 Alta Heights Ii, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $187,863 $56,687 $244,550 Chemical Storage, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $1,398,170 $678,851 $2,077,021 N/A, Hagen Oaks Pump Station 1 $92,538 $113,373 $205,911 N/A, Holly Court Pump Station 1 $92,538 $113,373 $205,911 Operations & Maintenance Facility, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $14,556,800 $285,241 $14,842,041 Ozone Building, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $2,549,830 $1 $2,549,831 Pumphouse Piping Etc., Eastside Reservoir 1 $122,241 $40,492 $162,733 Water Department Office 1 $1 $228,929 $228,930
Water Pump House, City Of Napa Water Division 1 $285,041 $42,252 $327,293 Office 7 $4,897,252 $860,428 $5,757,680
Administration Building, City Of Napa 1 $989,840 $201,858 $1,191,698 Large Annex Building, City Of Napa 1 $667,887 $57,423 $725,310 Multi-Purpose Building, City Of Napa 1 $2,175,180 $289,011 $2,464,191 Office, Office 1 $1 $28,922 $28,923
Office/Purchasing/Central Stores, City Of Napa 1 $434,313 $140,841 $575,154 Parks And Tree Maintenance Office, City Of Napa 1 $630,030 $57,841 $687,871 Personnel Office, Personnel Office & Annex 1 $1 $84,532 $84,533 Restroom 4 $399,840 $4 $399,844
Restroom #1 @ Mulberry Ii Picnic Area, Kennedy Park 1 $46,960 $1 $46,961 Restroom #2 @ Mulberry Ii Picnic Area, Kennedy Park 1 $96,550 $1 $96,551 Restroom (Pelusi), Kennedy Park 1 $127,547 $1 $127,548
Restroom Bldg, Fuller Park 1 $128,783 $1 $128,784
Golf Course 3 $1,714,926 $3 $1,714,929
Napa Golf Course- Cart Storage Building, City Of Napa 1 $397,555 $1 $397,556 Napa Golf Course- Clubhouse, City Of Napa 1 $1,317,370 $1 $1,317,371 Napa Golf Course- Golf Cart Storage, City Of Napa 1 $1 $1 $2 Rec 1 $403,524 $28,901 $432,425
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 325 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-16
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total
Pelusi Recreation Building, City Of Napa 1 $403,524 $28,901 $432,425 Residence 18 $5,695,965 $77,678 $5,773,643
Duplex, Housing Authority Of The City Of Napa: Laurel 14 1 $184,452 $2,251 $186,703 Duplex, Housing Authority Of The City Of Napa: Laurel 15 1 $184,452 $2,251 $186,703 Duplex, Housing Authority Of The City Of Napa: Laurel 8 1 $184,452 $2,251 $186,703 Duplex, Housing Authority Of The City Of Napa: Laurel 9 1 $184,452 $2,251 $186,703 Housing Authority Of The City Of Napa: Silverado 1 $1 $1 $2 Laurel Manor 1 (Four-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $345,860 $4,503 $350,363 Laurel Manor 10 (Five-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $420,273 $5,629 $425,902 Laurel Manor 11 (Recreation Building), City Of Napa 1 $435,264 $20,263 $455,527 Laurel Manor 12 (Five-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $420,273 $5,629 $425,902 Laurel Manor 13 (Four-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $345,860 $4,503 $350,363 Laurel Manor 16 (Four-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $345,860 $4,503 $350,363 Laurel Manor 2 (Four-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $345,860 $4,503 $350,363 Laurel Manor 3 (Four-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $345,860 $4,503 $350,363 Laurel Manor 4 (Four-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $345,860 $4,503 $350,363 Laurel Manor 5 (Five-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $420,273 $4,503 $424,776 Laurel Manor 7 (Five-Plex), City Of Napa 1 $420,273 $5,629 $425,902 Parks & Recreation Services Department Residence, City Of Napa 1 $266,640 $1 $266,641
Single Family Dwelling, .5 Acre Parcel 1 $500,000 $1 $500,001 Child Care 1 $235,785 $1 $235,786
Day Care Rto, Fuller Park 1 $235,785 $1 $235,786
City Hall 1 $4,183,540 $1,408,420 $5,591,960
City Hall, City Of Napa 1 $4,183,540 $1,408,420 $5,591,960 Police 2 $6,228,921 $1,408,421 $7,637,342
Police Department & Fire Administration, City Of Napa 1 $6,228,920 $1,408,420 $7,637,340 Police Shooting Range, Semi-Improved Land Rural 1 $1 $1 $2 Communication Tower 1 $70,427 $14,085 $84,512
Communication Tower & Equipment, Radio Facility - Mt. St.

Helena 1 $70,427 $14,085 $84,512
Parking Garage 3 $17,747,440 $3 $17,747,443
Clay Street Parking Garage., City Of Napa 1 $6,368,120 $1 $6,368,121 Parking Garage, City Of Napa 1 $5,592,150 $1 $5,592,151 Pearl Street Parking Garage, City Of Napa 1 $5,787,170 $1 $5,787,171 Historic 1 $2,184,260 $1 $2,184,261
Historic Borreo Building, City Of Napa 1 $2,184,260 $1 $2,184,261 Museum 1 $850,108 $1 $850,109
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 326 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
A-17
Site Value
Building/
Site Name # Bldg. Structure Content Total
Firefighter's Museum., City Of Napa 1 $850,108 $1 $850,109 Lot 2 $890,987 $281,686 $1,172,673

5.18 Acre Lot 1 $1 $1 $2
Surface Parking Lot, City Of Napa 1 $890,986 $281,685 $1,172,671 Teen Center 1 $184,741 $28,169 $212,910
Teen Resource Center 1 $184,741 $28,169 $212,910
Shop 4 $2,585,021 $422,049 $3,007,070
Facilities Shop, City Corporation Yard 1 $137,890 $69,410 $207,300 Fleet Maintenance Building, City Of Napa 1 $2,102,010 $289,011 $2,391,021 Repair Garage, City Corporation Yard 1 $251,779 $28,922 $280,701 Sign Shop, City Corporation Yard 1 $93,342 $34,706 $128,048 Community Center 1 $1,996,030 $70,421 $2,066,451
Las Flores Community Center, City Of Napa 1 $1,996,030 $70,421 $2,066,451 Grand Total 95 $119,674,576 $9,029,673 $128,704,249
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 327 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
A-18

INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 328 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B-1
B
Appendix B. Process Documentation
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 329 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B-2

INTENTIONAL BLANK PAGE
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 330 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
Appendix B
Table of Contents
Planning Committee Meeting Documentation..................................................B1 Public Notice & Press Release Documentation ................................................ B2 Survey & Results Documentation........................................................................ B3 Mitigation Strategy Prioritization Process Documentation.......................... B4 Website Documentation........................................................................................ B5 1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 331 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 332 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
Planning Committee
Meeting Documentation
Appendix B.1
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 333 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 334 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-1
First Name Last Name Title Affiliation
Type of
Stakeholder
(City, NGO,
local, regional,
state agency,
HMPC
Mtg #1
HMPC Mtg
#2
HMPC
Mtg #3
Draft
Review/
Direct
Outreach
Steve Brassfield Fire Chief (retired) City of Napa City X Zach Curren Fire Chief City of Napa City X
Phil Brun Utilities Director City of Napa City X
Doug DeMaster Senior Civil Engineer, Utilities Department City of Napa City X X X X Magdiel Frayre Parks, Trees, and Facilities Supervisor City of Napa City X Jaina French Community Relations & Media Manager City of Napa City X X Jeff Gittings Parks & Urban Forestry Management City of Napa City X X X Julie Lucido Public Works Director City of Napa City X X X Stephanie Proft Stormwater program. CRS Coord/ Floodplain Admin City of Napa City X X X X
Charlie Rhodes Battalion Chief. Project Lead. City of Napa City X X X X Joy Riesenberg Deputy City Manager City of Napa City X X Vincent Smith Community Development Director City of Napa City X Brandon Veyna Fire Prevention/ Inspector City of Napa City X Michael Walker Comm Dev, Planning and Code Enforcement
Div City of Napa City X X X
Jason Williams Chief Building Official City of Napa City X X Paul Warnock Team Leader City of Napa CERT Local Agency X X X Ken Arnold Napa County CERT Local Agency X X
Brian Bacinett Energy & Environmental Compliance Specialist Napa Valley Unified School District Local Agency X X
Lois Husted Base/Emergency Management Coordinator Queen of the Valley Medical Center Local Agency X X X
Trent Schager Fire Chief Napa State Hospital Fire
Department Local Agency X X
Kevin Twohey Napa Resident Napa Resident Local Citizen X X Beth Painter Napa Resident Citizen (now Council
member) Local Citizen X X X
Christina Benz Napa Resident
Napa Resident; Napa
Climate NOW!; Napa Sierra
Club
Local Citizen X X X
Tim Streblow Director, Napa Resident Gasser Foundation Local Citizen X Carol Rice Consultant Napa Communities
Firewise Foundation NGO X X
Teri Shore Advocacy Director Greenbelt Alliance NGO X X Celeste Giunta Director
Napa Valley Community
Orgs Active in Disasters
(COAD)

NGO X X X
Leah Greenbaum Emergency Services Officer Napa County Regional Agency X XX
Kevin Wasiewski Emergency Services Officer Napa County Regional Agency X
Frances Knapczyk Conservation Program Manager Napa County RCD Regional Agency X XX
Andrew Damron Technical Services Director Napa Sanitation District Regional Agency X X
City of Napa
2021 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
HMPC Meeting Attendance
HMPC Meeting Attendance
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 335 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-2
First Name Last Name Title Affiliation Type of Entity CRS Expertise Geoff Belyea Cal Fire/ Napa Co
Fire Asst Chief
Cal Fire/ Napa County Fire
Department Regional Agency
Property Protection,
Emergency Services
Paul Bradford Dep. Exec. Dir. For
Local Gov't Services
Association of Bay Area
Governments Regional Agency Public Information
Andrew Butler Senior Engineer Flood Control and Water Resources Regional Agency Structural Flood
Control Projects
James Cooper
Disaster Program
Manager Red Cross Local Agency Emergency Services
Nancy Levenburg Executive Director Napa County Historical Society NGO Public Information Phillip Miller Deputy Director Flood Control and Water Resources Regional Agency Structural Flood
Control Projects
Terrence Mulligan President
Napa Valley Community
Foundation Local Agency Preventative Measures
Hugo Nevarez Senior Manager Napa County Farm Bureau NGO Public Information Mike Palladini Stewardship
Program Manager Land Trust of Napa County NGO Public Information Doug Parker President & CEO Land Trust of Napa County NGO Public Information Gary Pitkin PD Lieutenants City of Napa City
Lena Pollastro
Land Programs
Manager Land Trust of Napa County NGO Public Information Jesse Ramer
and Education
Manager Napa Valley Vintners Local Business
Natural Resource
Protection
Allen Rossi
Director of
Maintenance and
Operations Napa County Office of Education Regional Agency Public Information Josh Schultz
Deputy
Superintendent Napa County Office of Education Regional Agency Public Information Sally Seymour Project Manager Sustainable Napa County NGO Preventative Measures
(codes)
Molly Williams
Industry and
Community Relations
Director Napa Valley Grapegrowers Local Business
Natural Resource
Protection
Penny Wilson District Assistant
Manager
Napa River Reclamation District
#2109 Regional Agency Public Information
Francie Winnen Secretary Friends of the Napa River NGO
Natural Resource
Protection
ISU Sander, Jacobs, Cassayre
Insurance Services Local Business Public Information
Malloy Imrie & Vasconi Insurance
Services, LLC Local Business Public Information
City of Napa
2021 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
INVITED TO HMPC- Did not participate
Non Participating Stakeholders
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 336 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-3
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-1
1 City of Napa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
Planning Committee Meeting #1
Agenda
▪ Welcome and Introductions
▪ Background
▪ Mitigation Planning Defined
▪ Planning Process Review
o Project Schedule
o Website Review
▪ FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance
▪ 2014 Mitigation Plan Review
o Recent Success Stories
▪ What Has Changed?
▪ Outreach
▪ Next Steps
Project Website: mitigatehazards.com
Project Webpage: mitigatehazards.com/napahmp/
Website Password: Napa2020
Via Zoom Conference call
Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020
2 PM – 4 PM
Web:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88984588725?pwd=a0hUVzNY
WEpmWi9qNEU0M1RqSnFlUT09
Passcode (web): Napa2020
Call in: 253 215 8782
Meeting ID: 889 8458 8725
HMPC Meeting #1 Agenda
Appendix_B-1
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 337 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-4
1 City of Napa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
Planning Committee Meeting #1
Agenda
▪ Welcome and Introductions
▪ Background
▪ Mitigation Planning Defined
▪ Planning Process Review
o Project Schedule
o Website Review
▪ FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance
▪ 2014 Mitigation Plan Review
o Recent Success Stories
▪ What Has Changed?
▪ Outreach
▪ Next Steps
Project Website: mitigatehazards.com
Project Webpage: mitigatehazards.com/napahmp/
Website Password: Napa2020
Via Zoom Conference call
Thursday, Nov. 19, 2020
2 PM – 4 PM
Web:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88984588725?pwd=a0hUVzNY
WEpmWi9qNEU0M1RqSnFlUT09
Passcode (web): Napa2020
Call in: 253 215 8782
Meeting ID: 889 8458 8725
HMPC Meeting #1 Agenda
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 338 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-5
Napa City Meeting #1:

Poll Results Reports
HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 1
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 339 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-6
1 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 2
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 340 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-7
2 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 3
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 341 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-8
3 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 4
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 342 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-9
4 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 5
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 343 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-10
5 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 6
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 344 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-11
6 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 7
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 345 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-12
7 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 8
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 346 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-13
8 HMPC Meeting #1 Poll EV Report 9
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 347 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-14
HMPC Meeting #1 Participant Screens
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 348 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-15
1 City of Napa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
Planning Committee Meeting #2
Agenda
▪ Welcome and Introductions
▪ Meeting #1 Brief Recap
▪ Risk Assessment/ Community Vulnerability Review
▪ Hazard Prioritization Exercise
▪ Review Upcoming Tasks (Areas of Concern, Capabilities, Mitigation Strategy)
▪ Review Outreach Materials
▪ Next Steps
Project Website: mitigatehazards.com
Project Webpage: mitigatehazards.com/napahmp/
Website Password: Napa2021
Polling Website for Smartphone: pollev.com/dynamicplanning Jan. 14 , 2021 Via Zoom Conference call
12 PM –2 PM Web:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82775716061?pwd=RVNLUW5Pb
G5wQ3pkUGhYS1FmWGhpZz09
Passcode (web): Napa2021
Call in: 669 900 6833
Meeting ID: 827 7571 6061
HMPC Meeting #2 Agenda
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 349 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-16
City of Napa Meeting #2:

Poll Results Reports
HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 1
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 350 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-17
9 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 10
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 351 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-18
10 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 11
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 352 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-19
1 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 2
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 353 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-20
2 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 3
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 354 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-21
3 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 4
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 355 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-22
4 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 5
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 356 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-23
5 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 6
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 357 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-24
6 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 7
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 358 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-25
7 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 8
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 359 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-26
8 HMPC Meeting # 2 PollEV Report 9
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 360 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-27
HPCMeeting #2 Participant Screens
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 361 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.1-28
HMPC Meeting #3 Parcipant Screens
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 362 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.1-29
1 City of Napa Hazard Mitigation Plan 2021 Update
Planning Committee Meeting #3
Monday, June 21st from 9-11 AM
Via Zoom conference call
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86253700703?pwd=emNZ
UWN3TldHTWdyR1NMS052Sk5vdz09
Password: Napa2021
Call-in option: 669 900 6833
Meeting ID: 862 5370 0703
Agenda
▪ Welcome and Introductions
▪ Check in and review of progress to date
▪ Linking Problem Statements and Mitigation Actions
o Review Mitigation Action Support Tool
▪ Setting Plan Goals
▪ Developing a Nexus to HMA Funding
▪ Maintaining Your Plan: the Next 5 Years
▪ Outreach check in
▪ Next Steps
Project Website: mitigatehazards.com
Project Webpage: http://mitigatehazards.com/NapaHMP/meetings/ Website Password: Napa2021
Polling Website for Smartphone: www.pollev.com/dynamicplanning HMPC Meeting #3 Agenda
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 363 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 364 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
Public Notice & Press
Release Documentation
Appendix B.2
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 365 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 366 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-1
City HMP Survey Post
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 367 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-2
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-1
City HMP Survey Post
Appendix_B-2
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 368 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-3
1 Torie Jarvis
From: Christina Benz <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2021 4:02 PM
To: Torie Jarvis; [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: Six Out of Forty-Six Actions You Can Take for Climate This Year Torie and Erin,
Please see item on survey in the Napa Climate NOW! newsletter.

Chris Benz
Napa Climate NOW!
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Napa Climate NOW! <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:00 AM
Subject: Six Out of Forty-Six Actions You Can Take for Climate This Year To: Christina Benz <[email protected]>
There are tons of actions to choose from: attend a training on solar or at least respond to a survey. Here are some different actions for you!
Volunteers Needed: Solar and
Energy Storage Training
Jumpstart Your Year with 46
Days of Action
Take This Survey to Support
Green Infrastructure
Napa Climate Now Survey Outreach
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 369 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-4
2 For each Napa resident, over 90%
of your greenhouse gas emissions
are related to your home and
your vehicles. Oddly, you can use
those two emitters to reverse the
climate change trend. We are
looking for volunteers who can
help us transform residential
homes with the power of solar -
join this training to help
neighbors and businesses
leverage the power of solar.

To mark the inauguration of the
46th President, 350 Bay Area, a
regional non-profit organization
dedicated to tackling the current
climate crisis, has organized the
46 Days of Climate Action. The
initiative is aimed at empowering
individuals of all ages and
backgrounds around the Bay Area
to take small actions that
collectively add up, helping to
bring attention and positive
impact to this important issue.

Take action here.

Bike highways are long distance
bikeways that run alongside state
highways (like the Napa Valley
Vine Trail). Caltrans Bay Area
wants your input on features that
will make bike highways safe and
easy for you to use. Learn more
about this program here and take
the survey here. Help green our
transportation infrastructure!
Let the City of Napa know
that Climate Change is a
Public Hazard
Climate Video Challenge For
California Middle and High
School Students
Interested in the Intersectional
Environmentalist Movement?
The City of Napa is updating its
Hazard Mitigation Plan and
wants to hear from you. Take
the survey here and let the city
know the climate change is a
hazard that should be included
in the Plan. Listing Climate
Change as a hazard will allow
the City to apply for funding
from FEMA to take action!
To protect the people and
places that we love, we need
to reimagine and rebuild our
present and future. We have
an opportunity to think
differently, to work differently,
to engage differently, and to
approach climate change in a
fair and just way for all
Californians. With this goal in
mind, the California Coastal
Commission invites California
Climate change and the solutions to
climate change are inextricably linked
to issues of racial, economic and global
justice. Come to an Environmental
Justice Committee meeting to see how
we are working on this critical area.

Contact Dave at
[email protected] for
meeting details.

Napa Climate Now Survey Outreach
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 370 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-5
3 middle and high school
students to present a video
response to the question:

What does climate justice look
like to me? Send your video
response to that question by
March 31st for a chance to
win. Find out more about the
challenge here.

Napa Climate NOW!
http://napa.350bayarea.org/
Napa Climate NOW! · Napa, California
This email was sent to [email protected]. To stop receiving emails, click here.

Napa Climate Now Survey Outreach
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 371 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-6
Napa FD Survey Post
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 372 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-7
Napa FD Survey Post Spanish
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 373 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-8
WWW.MITIGATEHAZARDS.COM
Help the City become more
informed about local hazards
and take a survey!!!
Be entered to win a hazard
mitigation home use item!
grand prize
$150 voucher toward
product

TAKE THE SURVEY AND

ENTER TO
a $150 voucher
toward product
WIN
www.mitigatehazards.com/
napahmp/
get-involved/
SURVEY LINK enlace de
encuesta
www.mitigatehazards.com/
napahmp/
get-involved/
gran premio
¡Un cupón por $150 en
productos !
Ayuda a la ciudad a estar más
informada sobre los peligros
locales respondiendo la
encuesta. Ingresa para ganar
un artículo para la mitigación
de peligros en casa.
¡RESPONDE LA ENCUESTA

Y ENTRA PARA
WWW.MITIGATEHAZARDS.COM
un cupón por $150 en
productos !
GANAR
Survey Graphic
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 374 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-9
City Public Draft FB Post
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 375 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-10
Napa FD Public Draft FB Post
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 376 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-11
Napa RCD Public Draft FB Post
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 377 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-12
Napa Newsletter Dec 3 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 378 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-13
Napa Newsletter Dec 3 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 379 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-14
Napa Newsletter Dec 3 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 380 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-15
Napa Newsletter Dec 3 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 381 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-16
Napa Newsletter Dec 10 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 382 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-17
Napa Newsletter Dec 10 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 383 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-18
Napa Newsletter Dec 10 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 384 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.2-19
Napa Newsletter Dec 10 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 385 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.2-20
Napa Newsletter Dec 10 Public Draft
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 386 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
Survey & Results
Documentation
Appendix B.3
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 387 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 388 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.3-1
1 City of Napa
2021 Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan:

Public Hazard Mitigation Survey
Summary
City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 389 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.3-2
Summary
An 8-question community survey was distributed by the City via a number of online platforms, namely social media ouotlets. The results of the survey are used to ensure that the priorities of the City match those of the residents/community members. The response rate for the survey has been remarkably successful, in large part due to comprehensive efforts at distributing the survey widely and ensuring its ease of access.

The survey response rate by demographic is listed here:

English Survey Responses
373
Spanish Survey Responses
15 City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 390 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.3-3
3 The following is a brief summary of responses:
▪ Property at risk? 81.8% of participants believe their property is at risk from a natural hazard disaster. ▪ Hazards experienced? Respondents have experienced the following hazards:
o Earthquakes (73.8%)
o Severe Weather – Summer (High Heat, High Wind) (57.8%) o Pandemic (55.7%)
o Drought (49.7%)
o Wildfire (45.7%)
o Flooding (15%)
o Only 5% of respondents had not experienced a natural hazard. ▪ Consider risk of hazards with home purchase? 58.2% of participants considered the risk of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home.
▪ Informed about hazard risks? 62.5% of respondents felt they were well-informed about the dangers of natural hazards, while 30.8% felt somewhat informed and 6.7% felt uninformed. ▪ What incentives would encourage home protection from hazards? Top three responses:
o rebate programs or reimbursement of upfront costs (64.9%) o insurance premium discounts (60.3%)
o building permit fee waivers (46.4%)
▪ Top mitigation projects for local governments to focus on? Top responses:
o Work on improving damage resistance of utilities (73.7%) o Retrofit and strengthen essential facilities (56.3%)
o Ensure emergency shelters, the Emergency Operations Center, and communication towns have backup power generators (55.5%)
o Replant vegetation after wildfires to prevent landslides and flooding (55%) o Replace inadequate or vulnerable bridges and roadways (51.7%) o Inform property owners of ways they can mitigate damage to their properties (49.3%) City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 391 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.3-4
4 Question-By-Question Summary
Question 1: Where does the survey respondent live?
The below pie chart shows the breakdown of where respondents live. City of Napa and other respondents include:
▪ City of Napa: 79.1% ▪ Unincorporated Napa County : 17.7% The remaining respondents represented an array of nearby municipalities . These included: Lake Berryessa, American Canyon, Folsom, and another municipality in Napa County.

Spanish survey results:

The majority of Spanish respondents came from the City of Napa (80%). The remaining respondents came from the County of Napa (13.3%) and other cities within the County of Napa (6.7%).

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 392 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.3-5
5 Question 2: Did you consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when you chose your home?
A majority of respondents (58.2%) did consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when they chose their home. A smaller percentage (30.6%) did not consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home. And smaller proportions either could not remember (2.7%) or did not have an option (8.6%) of considering the risks of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home.

Spanish survey results:

Of the four options, Spanish respondents responded with only three types of responses. Forty percent of the respondents did not consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when they chose their home. And an equal percentage (40%) did consider the risks of naturally occurring hazards when choosing their home.

A smaller percentage (20%) did not have an option when choosing their home.

Observation: The Spanish survey responses are split evenly between a yes and no, signaling that a greater proportion were influenced by this consideration than the English speakers.

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 393 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.3-6
6 Question 3: Do you believe your property is at risk from a natural disaster? Most respondents answered yes to this question, 81.8%, and only 18.2% answered no.

Spanish survey results:

Most respondents answered yes to this question, 73.3% as opposed to only 26.7% who answered no.

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 394 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.3-7
7 Question 4: Which of the following types of hazard events have you or someone in your household experienced at your current home? The below list summarizes the top responses for the type of hazard events respondents or household members have experienced, along with the percentage of total respondents:
▪ Earthquake (73.8%)
▪ Severe weather -summer (high heat, high wind) (57.8%) ▪ Pandemic (55.7%)
▪ Drought (Agricultural or domestic) (49.7%)
▪ Wildfire (45.7%)
▪ Severe weather -winter (extremely low temperatures, hard freezes) (15.1%) ▪ Flooding (including from a river, local drainage & high groundwater levels) (14.6%) ▪ Geohazard (landslide, erosion, mudslide, soil expansion/collapse) (7%) ▪ None of the above (5.4%)
▪ Climate Change (sea level rise) (4.9%)
▪ Agricultural disaster (1.1%)
▪ Dam failure (1.4%)
Respondents also replied with their own unique natural hazard concerns regarding which hazards they had experienced at their current home. Some trends from these responses included: chronically bad air; wildfire jump like Coffey Park in Santa Rosa; water quality; very poor air quality/from wildfires; water shortage; evacuation due to wildfire, etc.

Spanish survey results:

The below list includes the percentage of respondents who indicated that they have experienced the following hazards at their current home.
▪ Pandemic (80%)
▪ Earthquake (66.7%)
▪ Severe weather -summer (high heat, high wind) (53.3%) ▪ Drought (Agricultural or domestic) (40%)
▪ Wildfire (33.3%)
▪ Flooding (including from a river, local drainage & high groundwater levels) (13.3%) ▪ Severe weather -winter (extremely low temperatures, hard freezes) (20%) ▪ Dam failure (0%)
▪ Climate Change (sea level rise) (0%)
▪ None of the above (0%)
Observation: The exposure to pandemic by Spanish speaking populations was higher than in English speaking populations, as evidenced by the significantly higher percentage, 80% versus 55.7%.

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 395 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.3-8
8 Question 5: Do you think you are well informed about the dangers of natural hazards in this area?
The three options for answering this question were yes, no, and somewhat. Most respondents (62.5%) responded that they are well informed. About a third (30.8%) said no, they are not well informed, and 6.7% said they were somewhat well informed.

Spanish survey results:

Most Spanish speaking respondents answered yes to this question (40%). A minority answered no (26.7%), that they are well informed, and (33.3%) answered that they somewhat well informed.

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 396 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.3-9
9 Question 6: What actions have you taken for your home or property that increase personal safety or reduce risk and injury from potential disasters?
The list below reflects the percentage of respondents who have taken the following actions for their home or property that increase personal safety or reduce risk and injury from potential disasters. ▪ Purchased homeowners/renters insurance (84.3%)
▪ Installed low flow water devices for showers, faucets, and toilets (58.7%) ▪ Installed drought tolerant plants or landscaping (50.1%) ▪ Reduced vegetation around home for wildfire defense (48.5%) ▪ Installed alternate power supply; generators, battery/solar back up (39.1%) ▪ Installed fire resistant siding and roofing for wildfire defense (19%) ▪ Flood-proofing measures (elevating furnace, water heaters, electric panels) (11%) ▪ Asked landlord to conduct any of the above mitigation measures (7.2%) ▪ Installed basement flood proofing measures (sump pumps, waterproof paint/barriers) (7.4%) Respondents also replied with their own unique answers. Some highlights include: installing white reflective roofing, securing furniture for earthquake impact prevention, purchased earthquake insurance, installing additional ceiling insulation, creating emergency plan and go bags, etc.

Spanish survey results:

The list below reflects the percentage of respondents to the Spanish survey who have taken the following actions for their home or property that increase personal safety or reduce risk and injury from potential disasters.
▪ Purchased homeowners/renters insurance (38.5%)
▪ Reduced vegetation around home for wildfire defense (53.8%) ▪ Installed alternate power supply; generators, battery/solar back up (7.7%) ▪ Installed drought tolerant plants or landscaping (38.5%) ▪ Flood-proofing measures (elevating furnace, water heaters, electric panels) (15.4%) ▪ Installed fire resistant siding and roofing for wildfire defense (7.7%) ▪ Other (23.1%)
City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 397 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.3-10
10 Question 7: Which of the following incentives would encourage you to protect your home to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards? The list below reflects the percentage of respondents who indicated that the following incentives would encourage them to protect their homes to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards:
▪ Rebate programs or reimbursement of upfront costs (64.9%) ▪ Insurance premium discounts (60.3%)
▪ Building permit fee waiver (46.4%)
▪ Home improvement cost-share grants (40.2%)
▪ Labor assistance; for renters and homeowners (36.2%)
▪ Low interest home improvement loans (31.9%)
▪ Technical assistance: for renters and homeowners (27.3%) Respondents also replied with their own unique answers for which incentives would encourage them to protect their home to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards. Some noteworthy highlights include: help with analyzing and planning, training in sustainable landscaping/irrigation, better information, installation assistance for the disabled, etc.

Spanish survey results:

The list below reflects the percentage of Spanish-speaking respondents who indicated that the following incentives would encourage them to protect their homes to withstand the impacts of possible natural hazards:
▪ Rebate programs or reimbursement of upfront costs (20%) ▪ Technical assistance: for renters and homeowners (46.7%) ▪ Low interest home improvement loans (40%)
▪ Insurance premium discounts (20%)
▪ Building permit fee waiver (13.3%)
▪ Home improvement cost-share grants (13.3%)
▪ Labor assistance; for renters and homeowners (26.7%)
City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 398 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.3-11
11 Question 8: Which of the following mitigation projects do you believe local government agencies should focus on to reduce disruptions of services and to strengthen the community?
The list below reflects the percentage of respondents who selected various mitigation actions on which local governments should focus to reduce disruptions of services and to strengthen the community. ▪ Work on improving the damage resistance of utilities (73.7%) ▪ Ensure that emergency shelters, the Emergency Operations Center and communications towers have backup power generators (55.5%)
▪ Retrofit and strengthen essential facilities such as police, fire, emergency medical services, hospitals, schools, etc. (56.3%)
▪ Replant vegetation after wildfires to prevent landslides and flooding (55%) ▪ Replace inadequate or vulnerable bridges and roadways (51.7%) ▪ Inform property owners of ways they can mitigate damage to their properties (49.3%) ▪ Retrofit or upgrade drainage systems (38.3%)
▪ Assist vulnerable property owners with securing funding to mitigate impacts to their property(s) (53.1%)
▪ Provide better information about hazard risk and high-hazard areas (34.6%) ▪ Strengthen codes, ordinances, and plans (36.2%)
Respondents also replied with their own unique answers for which mitigation projects local governments should prioritize. Highlights include:
▪ Install renewable energy microgrid systems for
essential services.
▪ Help educate home owners in hillside areas of
Napa City of fire dangers of vegetation
overgrowth.
▪ Stronger responses to climate impacts and listening
to mitigation strategies of reducing pollution and
protecting natural landscapes.
▪ improve mobile phone reception in "dead spot"
areas so emergency information can be
transmitted to everyone.
▪ Clean up county and city own properties to prevent
fire hazard and reduce future problems after fires.
▪ Compile a list for elderly/infirm to be identified
for well fair check with evac assist in the event
of a disaster.

Spanish survey results:

The list below reflects the percentage of Spanish speaking respondents who selected various mitigation actions on which local governments should focus:
▪ Retrofit and strengthen essential facilities such as police, fire, emergency medical services, hospitals, schools, etc. (53.3%)
▪ Retrofit or upgrade drainage systems (33.3%)
▪ Work on improving the damage resistance of utilities (40%) ▪ Strengthen codes, ordinances, and plans (13.3%)
City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 399 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.3-12
12 ▪ Provide better information about hazard risk and high-hazard areas (40%) ▪ Replant vegetation after wildfires to prevent landslides and flooding (40%) ▪ Replace inadequate or vulnerable bridges and roadways (26.7%) ▪ Inform property owners of ways they can mitigate damage to their properties (13.3%) ▪ Assist vulnerable property owners with securing funding to mitigate impacts to their property(s) (33.3%)
▪ Ensure that emergency shelters, the Emergency Operations Center and communications towers have backup power generators (33.3%)
Additional Questions and Comments from Respondents
At the end of the survey, respondents were able to provide any additional questions or comments that they had regarding hazard mitigation and community protection against natural disasters. There were 334 different responses. These responses included compliments, questions, and comments indicating recommendations and challenges to mitigation. Below is a representative list of many comments, organized by theme. These themes include Wildfire, Climate Change, All Hazards, Earthquake, vulnerable populations, and Communication.

Wildfire
▪ Alta Heights is very close to burn area, but there is no evacuation plan or help in controlling increase of burnable material over the last 20 years. Some residents cannot join "Fire Wise" because they are within Napa City Limits.
▪ Develop good evacuation plans for wildfire and educate residents on plans. ▪ Air quality from wildfires is big concern.
▪ More needs to be done with brush management at parks like Westwood hills. ▪ Fire is the greatest threat. Need to work with property owners to clean up their property better to lower their risk and the stress on resources, besides cleaning county and city property to lower risk there.
▪ “There should be something passed to make it illegal for insurance companies to drop residents because of recent wildfires. We have lived here for years and suddenly no one wants to insure us.” ▪ “We were burned out in 2017. Insurance doesn’t begin to cover costs. Dead tree removal assistance would be helpful.”
▪ Start a citizens training program that educates the population on how to fire harden their property.

Employ CERT volunteers to go through neighborhoods and give out pamphlets on fire mitigation techniques.
▪ In some areas, 90% of the trees are dead. For instance, in Paradise. There are tall trees right by Howell mtn. road, which could obstruct evacuation routes if they fell across the road.

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 400 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.3-13
13 Climate Change
▪ Increase dependence on alternative energy sources.
▪ “As a parent, my #1 concern is that we address the climate emergency by reducing GHG emissions, including black carbon and methane, ensuring that our county reaches net zero emissions by 2030.

We must address the ROOT cause of our present-day hazards.” ▪ Protect against further deterioration of economy, security, and environment by making immediate reductions in carbon pollution. The County and cities can start by putting firm dates on stopping doing wrong by the climate.

All Hazards
▪ Make PG&E underground their facilities, without passing the cost on to their customers. ▪ “If we had a mass Exodus our roads couldn't help us get out safely.” ▪ Do not allow new construction/development in mapped earthquake, flood or slide zones. ▪ Put utilities underground. It makes the area look better and protects against hazards from the utility. ▪ “PG&E needs to stop with the seasonal rolling power outages every fall, every time there is a hot, dry, windy day. It's like living in a 3rd world country. Everyone blames global warming, but try controlled burning such as they do in Utah & Nevada.”
▪ Rebuild roads, maintain road surfaces and build separated bike lanes throughout the county to reduce the now significant threat of injury and death to cyclists. Promote biking as optimal local transportation for health and sustainability.
▪ Seasonal reminders in the paper or other publications to conserve water, check for common hazards, and list local resources for emergencies.
▪ No powerlines on windy vegetated areas. Mandate solar for those properties so there are not lines up in our vulnerable areas. Or underground power lines. ▪ Hazard mitigation works best when there is a whole-community approach to solving problems.

Educating communities about hazards in their local areas and phases of emergency management is key.
▪ The City’s police, fire and emergency medical services need to have specific plans for the different hazards the City faces. General Plans are lacking in some hazard mitigation strategies. ▪ Better resources for renters during an evacuation.
▪ “Please encourage self-sufficiency and self-reliance as much as possible. People who are prepared and adept at helping themselves are often the best equipped to help others AND support emergency response organizations when a natural disaster strikes.” Earthquake
▪ Provide earthquake notification and place to obtain info.

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 401 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.3-14
14 Communication
▪ Additional alternative ways to get/give emergency information. Sometimes during recent fires, floods & earthquakes text messages would work but cell phones & landlines did not which pose a problem for checking on seniors & those living in more isolated areas. ▪ “Would love to see this and other similar surveys better publicized so more people can participate.

Thank you also for having the survey in Spanish.”
▪ Fix/test/strengthen the emergency alert system in the City of Napa. Make sure it is robust enough to notify the public of an impending disaster when the power is out. ▪ “Increase county and city communications during times of crisis in both English and Spanish. I have noticed some improvement in the form of FB live and taped updates during the pandemic, but Nixle/Everbridge alerts are lacking.”
▪ Have better information for renters as to phone numbers who to call for help. You get a phone number, only to find that is not correct one, find another not to find that is not correct.

Vulnerable Populations
▪ City programs for medical vulnerable patients e.g., oxygen concentrators etc. that rely on power:
there aren’t effective processes to assist with urgent needs in the case of outages.

City of Napa Survey Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 402 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
Mitigation Strategy
Prioritization Process
Documentation
Appendix B.4
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 403 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 404 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.4-1
MAST Status Page
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 405 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 406 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
Website Documentation
Appendix B.5
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 407 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 408 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.5-1
Executive Summary
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 409 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.5-2
Mitigation at Home
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 410 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.5-3
Public Survey
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 411 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.5-4
Meetings
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 412 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.5-5
RAMP Resources
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 413 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.5-6
RAMP App
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 414 of 416
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
B.5-7
MAST Resources
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 415 of 416

HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN

CITY OF NAPA
CITY OF NAPA | HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN
B.5-8
Planning Process Library and Doc Upload
1-26-2022 Submittal EXHIBIT A Page 416 of 416