RESOLUTION R2004 39
RESOLUTIONOFTHECITYCOUNCILOFTHECITYOFNAPAJOINING THE STATEWIDE COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE
PROGRAMANDAUTHORIZINGTHECALIFORNIASTATEWIDECOMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO ACCEPT
APPLICATIONSFROMPROPERTYOWNERS, CONDUCTSPECIALASSESSMENTPROCEEDINGSANDLEVYASSESSMENTSWITHINTHETERRITORYOFTHECITYOFNAPA WHEREAS, theCaliforniaStatewideCommunitiesDevelopmentAuthority ( the "Authorit') is a jointexerciseofpowersauthoritythemembersofwhichincludenumerouscitiesandcountiesintheStateofCalifornia, includingtheCityofNapa ("Cit'); and WHEREAS, theAuthorityhasestablishedtheStatewideCommunityInfrastructureProgramSCIP") toallowthefinancingofcertaindevelopmentimpactfees ( the " Fees") levied in accordance with theMitigationFeeAct (CaliforniaGovernmentCodeSections66000andfollowing) andotherauthorityprovidingforthelevyoffeesonnewdevelopmenttopayforpubliccapitalimprovements (collectively, theFeeAcY') throughthelevyofspecialassessmentspursuanttotheMunicipalImprovementActof1913StreetsandHighwaysCodeSections10000andfollowing) (the "1913AcY') andtheissuanceofimprovementbonds (the "LocalObligations") undertheImprovementBondActof 1915 (StreetsandHighwaysCodeSections8500andfollowing) (the "1915AcY'); and WHEREAS, theCitydesirestoallowselectedownersofpropertybeingdevelopedwithinitsjurisdictiontoparticipateinSCIPandtoallowtheAuthoritytoconductassessmentproceedingsunderthe1913ActandissueLocalObligationsunderthe1915ActtofinanceFeesleviedonsuchpropertiesprovidedthatsuchpropertyownersvoluntarilyagreetoparticipateandconsenttothelevyofsuchassessments; and WHEREAS, ineachyearinwhicheligiblepropertyownerswithinthejurisdictionoftheCityelecttoparticipateinSCIP, theAuthoritywillconductassessmentproceedingsunderthe1913ActandissueLocalObligationsunderthe1915ActtofinanceFeespayablebysuchpropertyownersand, attheconclusionofsuchproceedings, willleryspecialassessmentsonsuchpropertywithintheterritoryoftheCity; and WHEREAS, therehasbeenpresentedtothismeetingaproposedformofResolutionofIntentiontobeadoptedbytheAuthorityinconnectionwithsuchassessmentproceedings, acopyofwhichisattached hereto as Exhibit A( the "ROI") andtheterritorywithinwhichassessmentmaybeleviedforSCIP providedthattheownerofanypropertysubjecttoassessmentconsentstosuchassessment) shallbecoterminouswiththeofficialboundariesoftheCityofrecordatthetimeofadoptionofeachsuchResolutionofIntention (the "ProposedBoundaries"), andreferenceisherebymadetosuchboundaries fortheplatormaprequiredtobeincludedinthisResolutionpursuanttoSection10104oftheStreetsandHighways Code; and WHEREAS, theCitywillnotberesponsiblefortheconductofanyassessmentproceedings; thelevyorcollectionofassessmentsoranyrequiredremedialactioninthecaseofdelinquenciesinsuchassessmentpayments; ortheissuance, saleoradministrationoftheLocalObligationsoranyotherbondsissuedinconnectionwithSCIP; and WHEREAS, pursuanttoGovernmentCodeSection6586.5, noticewaspublishedatleastfivedayspriortotheadoptionofthisresolutionofapublichearing, whichwasdulyconductedbythisCouncilconcerningthesignificantpublicbenefitsofSCIPandthefinancingofthepubliccapitalimprovementstobepaidforwiththeproceedsoftheFees.
R2004 39
ATTACHMENT 3
NOW, THEREFORE, BEITRESOLVEDbytheCityCounciloftheCityofNapaasfollows:
Section 1.
TheCityherebyconsentstotheconductofspecialassessmentproceedingsbytheAuthorityinconnectionwithSCIPpursuanttothe1913ActandtheissuanceofLocalObligationsunderthe1915ActonanypropertywithintheProposedBoundaries; provided, that a) SuchproceedingsareconductedpursuanttooneormoreResolutionsofIntentioninsubstantially the form of the ROI; and b) Thelegalowner(s) ofsuchpropertyexecuteawrittenconsenttothelevyofassessmentinconnectionwithSCIPbytheAuthorityandexecuteanassessmentballotinfavorofsuchassessmentincompliancewiththerequirementsofArticleXIIIDoftheStateConstitution. c) TheCityofNapahasfirstreviewedandiswillingtosupporttheplacementoffeesasanassessmentforsaidprojectwhichmeetsgoalssetoutinSection4ofthisResolution.
Section2. TheCityherebyfindsanddeclaresthattheissuanceofbondsbytheAuthorityinconnectionwithSCIPwillprovidesignificantpublicbenefits, includingwithoutlimitation, savingsineffectiveinterestrate, bondpreparation, bondunderwritingandbondissuancecostsandthemoreefficientdeliveryoflocalagencyservicestoresidentialandcommercialdevelopment.
Section3. TheAuthorityhaspreparedandwiflupdatefromtimetotimetheSCIPManualofProcedures" (the "Manual") andtheCitywillhandleFeerevenuesforpropertiesparticipatinginSCIPinaccordance with the procedures set forth therein.
Section4. TheappropriateofficialsandstaffoftheCityofNapaareherebyauthorizedtomakeSCIPapplicationsavailabletoeligiblepropertyownersasdeterminedbytheCityofNapafortheconstructionofprojectsthatbenefittheCityofNapainachievingitsgoalsintheareasofeconomicaldevelopment, affordablehousing, multi-familyhousing, commercialandindustrialdevelopmentasitseesfit. EligibilitytoparticipateinthisprogramwillbedeterminedsolelybyCityofNapaofficialsbaseduponapolicystatementdevelopedindependentlyofany outsideinfluences. ThestaffpersonslistedonExhibitB, andanyotherstaffpersonschosenbytheCityManagerfromtimetotime, areherebydesignatedasthecontactpersonsfortheAuthorityinconnectionwiththeSCIPprogram.
Section5. TheappropriateofficialsandstaffoftheCityareherebyauthorizedanddirectedtoexecuteanddeliversuchclosingcertificatesrequisitionsandrelateddocumentsasarereasonablyrequiredbytheAuthorityinaccordancewiththeManualtoimplementSCIPforpropertyownerswhoelecttoparticipateinSCIPandtoevidencecompliancewiththerequirementsoffederalandstatelawinconnectionwiththeissuancebytheAuthorityoftheLocalObligationandanyotherbondsforSCIP. Tothatend, andpursuanttoTreasuryRegulationsSection1.150-2, thestaffpersonslistedonExhibitA, orotherstaffpersonactinginthesamecapacityfortheCitywithrespecttoSCIP, areherebyauthorizedanddesignatedtodeclaretheofficialintentoftheCitywithrespecttothepubliccapitalimprovementstobepaidorreimbursedthroughparticipationinSCIP.
Section6. ThisResolutionshalltakeeffectimmediatelyuponitsadoption. TheCityClerkisherebyauthorizedanddirectedtotransmitacertifiedcopyofthisresolutiontotheSecretaryoftheAuthority.
R2004 39
ATTACHMENT 3
IHEREBYCERTIFYthattheforegoingresolutionwasdulyandregularlyadoptedbytheCityCounciloftheCityofNapaataregularmeetingofsaidCityCouncilheldonthe16hdayofMarch, 2004, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Block, Techel, Martin, CrawfordandHenderson
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ATTES :
CITY LERK OF HE CITY OF NAPA
R2004 39
ATTACHMENT 3
EXHIBIT A
FORMOFRESOLUTIONOF INTENTION
TO BE ADOPTED BY CSCDA
RESOLUTIONOF INTENTIONOF THECALIFORNIASTATEWIDE
COMMUNITIESDEVELOPMENTAUTHORITYTO FINANCETHEPAYMENT OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTSINTHEPROPOSEDASSESSMENTDISTRICTNO. COUNTY OF NAPA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PROPOSEDBOUNDARYMAP, MAKINGCERTAINDECLARATIONS, FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS CONCERNING RELATEDMATTERS, AND AUTHORIZING RELATED ACTIONS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, undertheauthorityoftheMunicipalImprovementAct of 1913 ( the " 1913 AcY'), being Division 12 (commencingwithSections10000andfollowing) oftheCaliforniaStreetsandHighwaysCode, theCommission ( the " Commission") oftheCaliforniaStatewideCommunitiesDevelopmentAuthority (theAuthority') intendstofinance, throughitsStatewideCommunityInfrastructureProgram, thepaymentofcertaindevelopmentimpactfeesforpublicimprovementsasdescribedinExhibitAattachedheretoandbythisreferenceincorporatedherein (the `ImprovementFees"), all of which are of benefit to the proposedAssessment District No. CountyofNapa, California (the "AssessmentDistricY'); and WHEREAS, theCommissionfindsthatthelandspeciallybenefitedbytheImprovementFeesisshownwithintheboundariesofthemapentitled "ProposedBoundariesofAssessmentDistrictNo. County of Napa, California," a copyof whichmapis onfilewiththeSecretaryandpresentedto this Commissionmeeting, anddeterminesthatthelandwithintheexteriorboundariesshownonthemapshallbedesignated "AssessmentDistrictNo. County of Napa, California"; NOW, THEREFORE, BEITRESOLVEDthattheCommissionoftheCaliforniaStatewideCommunitiesDevelopmentAuthorityherebyfinds, determinesandresolvesasfollows:
1. Theaboverecitalsaretrueandcorrect, andtkeCommissionsofindsanddetermines. 2•
PursuanttoSection2961oftheSpecialAssessmentInvestigation, LimitationandMajorityProtestActof 1931 (the "1931AcY'), beingDivision4(commencingwithSection 2800) oftheCaliforniaStreetsandHighwaysCode, theCommissionherebydeclaresitsintenttocomplywiththerequirementsofthe1931ActbycomplyingwithPart7.5thereof.
3. TheCommissionhasorwilldesignatearegistered, professionalengineerasEngineerofWorkforthisproject, andherebydirectssaidfirmtopreparethereportcontainingthemattersrequiredbySections2961(b) and10204oftheStreetsandHighwaysCode, assupplementedbySection4ofArticleXIIIDoftheCaliforniaConstitution.
4. TheproposedboundarymapoftheAssessmentDistrictisherebyapprovedandadopted. PursuanttoSection3111oftheCaliforniaStreetsandHighwaysCode, theSecretaryoftheAuthorityisdirectedtofileacopyofthemapintheofficeoftheCountyRecorderoftheCountyofNapawithinfifteen (15) daysoftheadoptionofthisresolution.
5. TheCommissiondeterminesthatthecostoftheImprovementFeesshallbespeciallyassessedagainstthelots, piecesorparcelsoflandwithintheAssessmentDistrict benefitingfromthepaymentoftheImprovementFees. TheCommissionintendstolevyaspecialassessmentuponsuchlots, piecesorparcelsinaccordancewiththespecialbenefittobereceivedbyeachsuchlot, pieceorparcelofland, respectively, fromthepayment of the Improvement Fees.
R2004 39
ATTACHMENT 3
6. TheCommissionintends, pursuantto subparagraph ( of Section 10204 of the California StreetsandHighwaysCode, toprovideforanannualassessmentuponeachofthe parcelsoflandintheproposedassessmentdistricttopayvariouscostsandexpenses incurredfromtimetotimebytheAuthorityandnototherwisereimbursedtotheAuthoritywhichresultfromtheadministrationandcollectionofassessmentinstallmentsorfromthe administrationor registrationof the improvementbondsand the variousfundsand accounts pertaining thereto.
7. Bondsrepresentingunpaidassessments, andbearinginterestataratenottoexceedtwelve percent ( 12°/ a) per annum, will be issuedin the mannerprovidedby theImprovementBondAct of 1915 (Division10, Streetsand Highways Code), and the last installmentofthebondsshallmaturenottoexceedthirty (30) yearsfromtheseconddayofSeptembernextsucceedingtwelve (12) monthsfromtheirdate.
8. TheprocedureforthecollectionofassessmentsandadvanceretirementofbondsundertheImprovementBondActof1915shallbeasprovidedinPart11.1, Division10, oftheStreetsandHighwaysCodeof theStateof Califomia.
9. NeithertheAuthoritynoranymemberagencythereofwillobligateitselftoadvance availablefundsfromitsortheirownfundsorotherwisetocureanydeficiencywhichmayoccurinthebondredemptionfund. Adeterminationnottoobligateitselfshallnotprevent theAuthorityoranysuchmemberagencyfrom, initssolediscretion, soadvancingfunds.
10. TheamountofanysurplusremainingintheimprovementfundaftercompletionoftheimprovementsandpaymentofallclaimsshallbedistributedinaccordancewiththeprovisionsofSection10427.1oftheStreetsandHighwaysCode.
11. TotheextentanyImprovementFeesarepaidtotheAuthorityincashwithrespectto propertywithintheproposedAssessmentDistrictpriortothedateofissuanceofthe bonds, theamountssopaidshallbereimbursedfromtheproceedsofthebondstotheproperty owner or developer that made the payment.
R2004 39
ATTACHMENT 3