ATCH 6 – Historical Memorandum — Napa City Council, May 2, 2023

Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

1 MEMORANDUM

Teresa Grimes | Historic Preservation

[email protected]

323
-
868
-
2391

Date:

Decem
ber
2 1
,
2022

For:

City of
Napa
, Planning Division

Subject:

Certificate of Appropriateness
, The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road

______________________________________________________________________________

NTRODUCTION

A development project (Project)

called The Crescent

has been proposed for the former site of
the Napa County Health and Human Services Campus (Project Site, see Fi
gure 1
). The 8.65
-
acre
Project Site is located at 2344 Old Sonoma Road and is occupied by eleven buildings and six
modular units
, which are

surrounded by landscaped areas, walkways, access roads, and surface
parking areas. The

Project

S
ite is
bounded

by single
-
family ho
uses

and the Napa Christian
School campus

to the north
,

single
-
family ho
uses

on Gesford Street to the east
,

Old Sonoma
Road to the south
,

and the Napa County Juvenile Justice Center and Walnut Street to the west.

Figure 1: Location of
P
roject
S
ite

dashed in red

(Google Earth, 2022)

Old Sonoma Road

Walnut Stree
t

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

2 The

southeastern portion of the Project Site

contains the
remaining
buildings

of the Napa
County Infirmary and

was listed in the National Register of Historic Pl
aces (National Register)
on
June 4, 2018

(see
Figure
s

2 and 3
)
. Properties listed in the National Register are automatically included in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register) and defined as mandatory historical resources by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

C
hanges

to
th
e
property

are regulated by
Municipal Code Section 15.52
,

which states the alteration,
demolition, or relocation of any listed
historical
resource requires a Certificate of
Appropriateness.

The findings required for the approval of a Certificate of Appropr iateness

i
nclude compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards

(Standards)
.

This
memorandum
was prepared for

the Certificate of Appropriateness application for
The Crescent

P
roject proposed by

the Napa Community Real Estate Fund
, LP

(Applicant)
.

Figure
2 : Location of
P
roject
S
ite

dashed in red and National Register
District
boundary
highlighted in yellow

(Google Earth, 2022)

Teresa Grimes | Historic Preservation (TGHP) was retained

by the Applicant

t
o review the
schematic design plans

for the
P
roject to ensure that
the
proposed
changes

are consistent with
the Standards.

She fulfills the qualifications for a historic preservation professional outlined in Title 36 of the Code of Feder
al Regulations, Part 61. Her résumé is included in
A
ttachment

A
.

Old Sonoma Road

Walnut Street

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

3 METHODOLOGY

In preparing this memorandum,
TGHP

performed the following tasks:

•

Reviewed existing information on the

property

including the National Register

Form
.

•

Researched the
construction history

of the

property

to fill information gaps in the
existing information.

•

Conducted
a
site visit

on January 3,
2022,

to
assess building conditions and to
identify
character
-
defining features
.

•

Provided advice to the
P
roject
T
eam on complian
ce with the

Standards
.

•

Reviewed the attached
schematic design plans

prepared

Project

M+
and dated
December 1
5 ,
2022

for

compliance with the Standards (see
Attachment
B
)
.

DEVELOPMENT

HISTORY

The
property

evolved over

time with buildings constructed, demolished, relocated, and altered between 1869 and 1997. The development history below is based upon the 2017 National Register Form and supplemented with published sources in local newspapers, Sanborn maps, aerial photogr
aphs, architectural drawings, and historic photographs.

TABLE I

Y
ear

Ev
ent

1869

The
County establishes an
i
nfirmary on a 20
-
acre parcel; Beeby Robinson & Son
construct the first building
.

1880 circa

A bird’s eye view drawing shows the
infirmary building oriented toward a
crescent shaped driveway

and lawn,

and a water tower and ancillary building on
the north (see
Figure
4 )
.

1890 circa

A cross
-
gabled hay barn is constructed to the north and a superintendent’s cottage to the east of infi
rmary building.

1897

The
County funds a new stone hospital building

(
west portion of
Building B)
.

1901

The
Sanborn Map documents
the

stone
hospital
building

on
the
west,
the
infirmary
building in

the

center, and
the superintendent’s cottage
on

the
east
;

the components are connected on
the
north

by a corridor. The hay barn and
water tower are to the north

(see
Figure
5 )
.

1910

The
Sanborn Map

shows more detail and subtle changes, but no major
alterations since
1901

(see
Figure
6 ).

1912

The
County hires William H. Corlett to prepare plans
for

men’s

(Building A)

and
women’s dormitories

(Building C)

(see
Figures
7 to
8 )
. The superintendent’s
cottage is moved further east.

1924

The
Sanborn Map documents
the stone

hospital

building on
the
west. The use

labeled

hospital and the building has a front gabled roof and projecting front porch.

The
infirmary

building in
the
center

is the same as before; however, it is
now shown as two stories. The use is labeled kitchen

and dining room.

The
ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

4 TABLE I

Y
ear

Ev
ent

superintendent’s cottage is relocated to the east of Building C. The water tower on the north is

gone.

There are three new ancillary buildings around the hay
barn on the north including a laundry

(see
Figure
9 ).

1934

The County recei
ves funds from the Civil Works Administration to remodel the two
-
story center building (Building B) to match Buildings A and C. The 1897 stone hospital building is retained but altered.

The front (south) porch is
removed and replaced with a 14’0” x 29’ x 6
” enclosed addition (see
Figure
10 ).

The 1869 infirmary building is demolished and replaced with a new building. A colonnade is constructed between Buildings B and C.

In addition, the front
(south) porches of Buildings B and C are altered (see
Figure
11 ). It appears that
some of the 1934 imp
rovements are based upon
u
ndated drawings by architect
C.L. Hunt

(see
Figure
12 ).

1949

The Sanborn Map documents the stone building is preserved, but the remainder is demolished and replaced (Building B). The ancillary buildings include the superintendent’s cottage on the east and the three buildings on the north

(see
Figure
13 )
. The hay barn is now labeled “Helps Quarters.”

1953

The Napa County Social Welfare Department constructs a new building at 2261 Elm Street.

1962

The institution be
comes a licensed nursing facility for the elderly. The building interiors are altered to accommodate non
-
ambulatory patients.

1970

The proposed re
-
roofing plan indicates clay roof

tiles

will be replaced with
asphalt shingles

(see
Figure
14 )
.

1973

The ins
titution closes as convalescent home because the buildings no longer meet State code. The County converts the property into an alcohol and mental health services facility and the name changes to Napa County Health and Human Services. Building A becomes a d
ining room and a crisis center; Building B
becomes administrative offices, a conference room, and activity room; and Building C becomes overnight accommodations for male and female patients.

Historic photographs show the front porches of Buildings A, B, an d C have been
enclosed by this time, but original windows remain

(see
Figures
15 to
16 )
.

1995

The County adopts a new master plan for the property

(see
Figure
17 )
. At this
time, there are 12 building
s

including six older buildings. The remainder are
modul
ar building
s
.

1997

Buildings A, B, and C are renovated including new restrooms and ADA ramps; four new modular buildings are added; two existing modular buildings are moved; the hay barn is dismantled, and materials re
-
used in
a
new animal barn
at
Connolly Ranch; the maintenance building and superintendent’s cottage are demolished, the colonnade that once connected Buildings B and C is also demolished.

2000s

The wood windows in Buildings A, B, and C are removed and replaced with vinyl windows between 1997 and 2012.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

5 TABLE I

Y
ear

Ev
ent

2014

The stone hospital building (west portion of Building B) is damaged in the South Napa earthquake.

2016

The Health and Services Agency moves to a new location and the buildings are vacated.

SUMMARY OF NATIONAL ELIGIBL
ITY

Boundary and

Contributing

Resources

The property was listed in the National Register in 2018 as a district under Criterion A and Criterion C.

The district boundary is generally rectangular in shape and includes the 1897/1934 hospital/infirmary buildi
ng (Building B) as well as the 1912 men’s and women’s
dormitory
buildings

(Buildings A and C), which are oriented around the crescent shaped driveway

and
lawn
. In addition to these three contributing buildings

and one contributing feature
, the district
inc
ludes three non
-
contributing buildings (Buildings D, E, and F) that were added in the 2000s.

The northern portion of the property was not included in the district boundary. It historically included farmland and ancillary buildings that supported the operat ion of the County Infirmary;
however, it was redeveloped by the Health and Human Services Agency from the 1950s through the 2000s

and does not retain historic character.

Figure
3 :

Boundary map from National Register Form

(
2017
)

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

6 Significance

The
d
istrict is significant under Criterion A at the local level for its association with the development
of
Napa County’s government institutions during the nineteenth century and the subsequent
expansion

of local government in response to population growth.

The period of
significance begins in 1912 with the construction of the men’s and women’s
dormitory buildings

(Buildings A and C)

flanking the

hospital/infirmary

building

(Building B)
.

Why the period of
significance

on the National Register Form

did not beg
in in 1897 with the construction of the
stone hospital building (west portion of Building B) is unclear.

The period of significance ends in
1962, when the County Infirmary

ceased to function
.

The
d
istrict is also eligible at the local level
for its

archite
cture f
rom

the period between 1912 and 1934. The three buildings and crescent

shaped driveway and

lawn

are linked by plan

and
us
e

and form a physical record of early
-
twentieth century institutional architecture.

The

1912 buildings designed by
master
archit
ect
W. H. Corlett
1 represent a
n
early use of reinforced concrete construction and are the first regional examples of a progressive cottage plan institution. They are also excellent examples of Corlett’s ability to blend utilitarian considerations such as fireproof construction and cost
-
consciousness with aesthetically distinctive buildings with Mission

Revival style

features.

Alterations

The National Register Form noted the following alterations that were confirmed by the investigations conducted for thi
s memorandum:

•

The removal of the clay roof

tiles

and replacement with composition shingles on all
three contributing buildings.

•

The removal of the wood sash
es

and replacement with vinyl sash
es

on all three
contributing buildings. However, window openings
were not re
-
sized

and a few original
wood sashes remain.

•

The enclosure of the arched front (south) porches on all three contributing buildings.

•

The removal of front (south) entrance doors on all three contributing buildings.

•

The removal of back (north) po
rches on Buildings A and C.
2 •

The removal
of
front and back steps and
the
addition of ADA ramps on all three
contributing buildings.

•

The addition of mechanical equipment and
a
screen on top of Building B.

•

The surrounding new development including institut
ional buildings on the north and
residential buildings on the east.

The
National Register

Form states that the three contributing buildings appear to retain much of their original interior fabric, but the investigation conducted for this memorandum found

1 The summary statement of significance attributes the 1934 portion of Building B to Corlett, but the narrative makes clear that he was not the architect.

2 Not noted on National Register Form.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

7 that was not the case. Floor plans have been reconfigured and materials

have been

replaced
repeatedly
.

Integrity

Notwithstanding the alterations noted above, the
National Register

Form found the district
retains all seven aspects of integrity: location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association.

CHARACTER
-

DEFINING FEATURES

Character
-
defining features are the architectural components that contribute to a building's sense of time and place.

Preservation Brief
No.
17:

Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic

Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character

notes:

A complete

understanding of any property may require documentary research about its style, construction, function, its furnishings, or contents; knowledge about the original builder, owners, and later occupants; and knowledge about the evolutionary history of the bu
ilding. Even though buildings may be of historic, rather than architectural significance, it is their tangible elements that embody its significance for association with specific events or persons and it is those tangible elements both on the exterior and interior that
should be preserved.
3 The character
-
defining features of
contributing
buildings can be generally grouped into three
categories: the overall visual character, the exterior materials and craftsmanship, and the interior spaces, features, and f
inishes. The relative importance of character
-
defining features depends on
the level of craftsmanship, visibility, and integrity.

The

character
-
defining features

of the National
Register District are listed below:

Overall

Visual

Character

•

Crescent

shaped

driveway

and

lawn

•

Orientation

contributing

buildings

driveway

•

Collection

individual

buildings

•

Residential

feeling

despite

institutional

use

•

One

story

height

•

Raised

basement
s

•

Rectangular

form
s

(Buildings

and

•

Irregular

form

(Building

•

Reinforced

concrete

construction

(Buildings

and

3 Lee H. Nelson,

"Preservation Brief #17: Architectural Charac
ter: Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character,” US Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Cultural Resources,

1. ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

8 •

Mission

Revival

style

•

Steeply

pitched

hipped

roofs

•

Symmetry

south

facades

(Buildings

and

Exterior

Materials

and

Craftsmanship

(Buildings

and

•

Lightly

textured

stucco

walls

•

Cut

stone

foundation

(Building

•

Overhanging

eaves

•

Exposed

carved

rafter

tails

•

Dormers

•

Belt

course
s

between

basement
s

and

first

floor
s

•

First

floor

window

openings

•

Basement

vent

openings

•

Wood

window

frames
,

sills,

and

sashes

remaining

few

locations

Interior

Spaces,

Features,

and

Finishes

(Buildings

and

•

None

PROPOSED

PROJECT
4 Introduction

The

proposed

P
roject w
ill

demolish nine
existing

buildings, rehabilitate three existing buildings
,

and construct six new condominium
buildings
and eight
new
single
-
family ho
uses
.

The three
rehabilitated buildings are the three buildings (Buildings A, B, and C) that contribute to t he
National Register District. Among the demolished buildings are the three non -
contributing
buildings (Buildings D, E, and F) to the National Register District

(see
Figure 3
).

It should be noted that the proposed Project changes the naming conventions f or the three
contributing buildings

from Buildings A, B, and C

to Buildings C1, C2, and C3.

For the sake of
simplicity, this

memorandum

uses the existing naming
conventions
.

The central

Building

will
be
adaptively reused as

a
community
-
serving
café,
art studios,

and
event

spaces.

Buildings

and

will be adaptively reused as residential units, with three units in each building.

Two new buildings

will be constructed within the boundary of the National Register District .

One of these (
called the Cres
cent
Building
)
will
occupy

the former location of the non
-
contributing Building D

that

will be demolished
. The other new building (
called the Carriage
Building
)
will be sit
uated

behind

(northwest)

Buildings
A

and
B
.

The Carriage
Buildin
g

will
include three

townhomes and
the
Crescent
Building

will include

three townhomes and one flat.

4 Project description provided by the Applicant.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

9 The center of the Project Site will be occupied by three more
new buildings

with 101
condominium units

constructed on top of a semi
-
subterranean parking garage. The
se

buildings
will be two to four stories in height and
arranged

in courtyard configurations

(Courtyard
Buildings)
. A small portion of one of these

C
ourtyard

B
uildings is

located

within the Natio
nal
Register District boundary.

The eastern edge of the
P
roject
S
ite
will include

eight new single
-
family ho
uses, three of which will be within the boundary of the National Register District . The
height, scale,

design,

and massing

of these ho
uses

creates a

transition between the
new
C
ourtyard
B
uildings

to the west

and
the adjacent single
-
family neighborhood

to the east
.

The
Project will also include a new
three
-

and four
-
story

building

with 40 condominium units

to the
north
west. This building

(called the Redwood Building)

will be accessed from Walnut Street and
is not located within the boundary of the National Register District.

Residential units on the
Project Site will total 162 units.

See
A
ttachment

for the proposed Project plans.

Build
ing Design Features

The

goals that lead to the

design of the

proposed
P
rojec
t include
d enhancing the integrity of
the National Register District, creating new housing that blends into the neighborhood organically, and rehabilitating the three contributing

buildings in compliance with the
Standards.

The integrity of the National Register District will be enhanced by r
ehabilitating the three
contributing buildings
, r
emoving the three non
-
contributing buildings
,

p
reserving the crescent

shaped driveway and
lawn
, and

c
onstructing two new non
-
contributing but compatible
buildings
.

A variety of new residential buildings will be constructed throughout the remainder of the Project Site with a mix
ture

of unit sizes and affordability levels.

Bu
ilding types will include
courtyard
s
, townhouses, triplexes, and single
-
family houses.

The architectural styles of the new
buildings reflect the architectural vocabulary of Napa and complement the architecture of the three
contributing
buildings
.

The site
plan was developed around mature trees to
avoid a
regimented pattern
. To ensure that the Project blended into the neighborhood , the
Applicant

retained two different architecture firms who each brought their own aesthetic viewpoint to th
e Project.

The thr
ee contributing buildings w
ill

be rehabilitated in compliance with the Standards. The
State Historical Building Code w
ill

be used
to preserve the character
-
defining features of the
contributing buildings, while converting them to new uses, updating mechani cal systems, and
providing reasonable access to the physically disabled.

The contributing buildings will be
preserved in their entirety maintaining building heights and shapes, roof forms and details, fenestration patterns, and stucco walls. Original featu res will be repaired as necessary using
recognized methods. A key component of the Project w
ill

be removing insensitive alterations
and restoring missing features to improve the historic character of the contributing buildings.

This work w
ill

include
removing non
-
original vinyl sashes, slab doors, composition roof shingles, ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

10 mechanical equipment, and ADA ramps and restoring clay tile roofs, wood window sashes and basement vents, front and back porch configurations, and wood paneled doors . New features
r
equired for the new uses w
ill

be located on rear (north) facades, which are not visible from Old Sonoma Road.

Sustainability

The
P
roject w
ill

include solar panels on
most of the new buildings and
Energy Star appliances
and low flow plumbing fixtures thr
oughout. Electric Vehicle (EV) chargers w
ill

be provided in

the
parking garage
. The single
-
family
house will

have
l
aundry to
l
andscape graywater systems
installed.

Open Space and Landscaping

The landscape design w
ill

retain over 50 of the existing 86 trees, retain the crescent

shaped
open space,

and
create

over 90,000 square feet of common open space for the
Project
S
ite. The
P
roject w
ill

include approximately one mile of new trails and walks to connect the new reside
ntial buildings, seven gardens
,

and ten courtyards.

The new landscape palette w
ill

predominately include appropriate native and ornamental plant material that is sustainable to the local climate. The landscape water needs w ill

meet the local
Water Use Requirements, as mandated by the State of California.

Additional sustainable features in the landscape include:

installation of
bio
-
retention and infiltration systems to clean and reduce storm water runoff
,

planting up to 100

additional trees to reduce heat island effect
,

inclusion of solar energy Photovoltaic panels on pergolas ,

installation of low flow drip and smart irrigation
,

and

installation of appropriate tree types and placement to reduce energy costs of the

buildings.

The existing crescent

shaped

open space

w
ill

be slightly reduced to meet sustainable water use
requirements but w
ill

still include approximately 20,000 square feet of lawn for resident use.

Seven on grade gardens w
ill

incorporate various amenities such a
s, seating areas, jogging trails,
horseshoe pits for play or bean bag toss, picnic areas, short term bicycle parking stations, free play open space and quiet contemplative areas. Ten courtyards constructed over the parking

garage

w
ill

offer residents shade
d spaces, communal conversation seating areas, barbequing opportunities, dining spaces and private open space patios. All of the gardens and courtyards w
ill

be accessible to the residents.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

11 SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS

Th
e

required findings for

the
approval of a Certificate of Appropriaten
ess are based upon
Municipal Code Section 15.52.070 (F) (2):

The project does not adversely affect the special character of historic, architectural, or aesthetic interest or value of the local landmark dis trict; and

The project is consistent with the applicable Secretary of the Interior’s Standards; and

The project is consistent with applicable historic design guidelines. (O2015 -
15,

12/15/15)

The Standards were issued by the National Park Service and are accompanied by Guidelines for four types of treatments: Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration, and Reconstruction. The most common treatment and the one that applies to the proposed p
roject

is rehabilitation.

The definition of rehabilitation assumes that at least some repair or alteration of the historic property

w
ill

be needed in order to provide for efficient, ongoing use; however, these repairs and alterations

should

not damage or destr
oy materials, features
,

or finishes that are important
in defining the
property
's historic character.

It is important to note that the Standards

are not intended to be prescriptive, but instead
provide general guidance. They are intended to be flexible an d adaptable to specific project
conditions to balance continuity and change, while retaining materials and features to the maximum extent feasible. Their interpretation requires exercising professional judgment and balancing the various opportunities and c
onstraints of any given project. Not every Standard
necessarily applies to every aspect of a project, nor is it necessary to comply with every Standard to achieve compliance as a whole.

In accordance
with
Municipal Code Section

15.52.070 (F) (2) (c)
the
Project is analyzed below
for compliance

with the
Standards

for Rehabilitation
.

Standard 1.

A property will be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its si te
and environment.

The property was originally constructed as the Napa County Infirmary; however, it

has not been
used for
that

purpose since 1962. Between 1962 and 1973, the property was used as a licensed nursing facility for the elderly. In 1973, the facility closed,

and the property was converted into
an alcohol and me
n
tal health

services facility. That facility closed in 2016
. The proposed Project
will convert Buildings A and C into residential condominiums; three units in each buil ding.

Building B will be converted into

an
event space, café, and
community arts center
.

These new
uses will require minimal changes to the charact
er
-
defining features of the contributing
buildings.

Most of the changes involve adding new dormers on the rear (north) roofs of Buildings A and C to allow for the use of the attic spaces. Additionally, a few window openings ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

12 on the rear facades of Buildings

A, B
,

and C will be lowered and converted into doorways.

The
crescent shaped driveway and lawn will continue to provide vehicular circulation and open space, respectively.

The Crescent Building will be the only new building that is clearly visible from Ol
d Sonoma Road. It will replace a non
-
contributing building that is not compatible with
the historic charac
ter of the property. As discussed further under Standard 9, the Crescent
Building

is compatible with the
massing, size, scale, and architectural featu
res of the
contributing buildings.

Therefore, the Project complies with Standard 1.

Standard 2.

The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize

a
property will be avoided.

The

Project
comp
lies

with Standard 2

because the

historic character
of the

contributing
buildings and landscape feature as well as the district as a whole

will be

retained and
preserved
.

The Project does not propose the removal of any of the character defining features described above.

The demolition activity described above is limited to the removal of

non
-
contributing buildings and

non
-
original materials and features

such as

roof shingle
s
,
vinyl
windows
, and ADA ramps.

Standard 3.

Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use.

Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from

other buildings, will not be
undertaken.

The use of architectural features or elements from other buildings is not proposed as part of the
P
roject.

The
contributing

buildings rather than other buildings have been used as the source of inspiration for minor alterations on the rear (north) facades of the contributing buildings.

Therefore, the
Project c
ompl
ies

with Standard 3.

As discussed further under Standard 9, the
new buildings within the boundary of the district have been designed to be compatible but distinguishable as new.

Standard 4.

Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be
retained and preserved.

As
previously stated
, the district is significan
t

in different contexts with different periods of
significance.

The period of significance under National Register Criterion A is 1912 to 1962 and

the

period of significance under Nat
ional Register Criterion C is 1912 to 1934.

The

Project
comp
lies

with Standard
4 because

n
one of the

alterations to the contributing buildings after
19 62 have acquired historic significance in their own right.

These changes were made to
improve the building’s mechanical systems and to provide accessibility, but without regard for aesthetics.

These

changes have diminished the integrity of
the
contributing buildings and the
Project
proposes

to reverse these chang
es to improve the
historic and architectural character
of the district.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

13 Standard 5.

Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property will be preserved.

The

P
roject

complies

with Standa
rd 5.

The contributing buildings are fairly simple in design

and
construction, which
reflects

their institutional use as a poor farm, their Mission Revival style that lacked ornamentation, and
(
in the case

of Building B and alterations to Buildings A and C
)

their
period of

construction during the Great Depressi
on. Some of the distinctive features
such as
wood sash windows and clay tile roofs have been removed and will be restored by the Project.

The most distinctive construction technique within the district is the use of reinforced concrete construction in Buildings A and C, which will be preserve d.

Standard 6.

Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualitie s and,
where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence.

The only feature that is deteriorated is the cut stone
, which is primarily exposed along the
foundation and
small
sect
ion
s

of the
east and
west facade
s

of the 1897 portion of Building B.

The

stone has been painted, which captured moisture. As a result, the

outer surface is spalling,
which

has

accelerate
d the

weathering.

The precise treatment of the stone has not been
dete
rmined. A qualified building materials conservator will be retained to further assess

the
condition of the stone and recommend a treatment ranging from preservation to consolidation.

At a minimum the stone will be preserved, which means the paint will be r emoved and a new

permeable

coating will be applied to stop future decay
.

In addition, some stone units have fallen

from the west facade

as a result of seismic activity.

To
address both the fallen stones and the structural condition of the remaining stones, the
architect and structural engineer have devised a solution that includes reinforcing the existing building walls with shotcrete installed on the interior side of the walls, and then attaching the existing stone (including stones that h
ave fallen and will be re
-
installed) to the new shotcrete
structure using reinforcing steel and epoxy

(see
Figure 18
).

Other features

such as the stucco walls and wood rafter tails

are in good to fair condition and
will be repaired as necessary.

As disc
ussed under Standard 5, some of the features are missing.

These include wood sash
windows, clay roof tiles, and
front

(south)

and
rear (north)

porch configurations and detai
ls.

New wood sashes have been designed to match the few original ones that remain a s well as the
historic drawings and photographs. Clay tile roof tiles have been selected to resemble the historic drawings and photographs
.

Front

and rear

porches have been designed to match the

historic drawings

and photographs
. In
Buildings A and C, the current front steps will be removed, the lower portions of the front and ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

14 rear walls will be preserved, and new front and rear steps will be created.

On the front porches,
the
non
-
original vinyl windows will be removed
,

and the

w
ood windows restored

to the 1934
design
. On the rear porches, the non
-
original infill will be removed so the arched openings can be restored.

In Building B, the
main entrance to the 1934 portion of the building is essentially intact; however, the arched o
penings have been infilled with vinyl windows. The vinyl windows will be removed to restore the original open porch.

the rear,
the corridor that connects the 1934
and 1897 portions has been infilled and the access was reconfigured with an ADA ramp.

Thes
e
non
-
original features will be removed. However, there are no historic drawings or photographs of the north façade. The original configuration of the corridor is evident from the physical evidence, but the design is unknown. As discussed under Standard 9,

the new railing is simple in
design, which is in keeping with the Mission Revival style of the building.

For all of the reasons discussed above, the Project will comply with Standard 6.

Standard 7.

Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials will not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.

Any chemical or physical treatments deemed necessary for the repair and restoration of historic materials and features will be conducted in accordance with National Park Service

standards and
guidance using the gentlest means possible. No treatments that c ause damage to historic
materials will be used. The
refore, the

Project complies with Standard 7.

Standard 8.

Significant archeological resources affected by a project will be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measur es will be
undertaken.

The Project will require ground disturbing
activities
, but m
ostly outside the boundary of the
district. The

Courtyard

Buildings

will be constructed on top of a semi
-
subterranean parking

garage, which will be approximately 7’ below g
rade. The Redwood Building, Crescent Building,
Carriage
Building
, and single
-
family houses will require excavations for footings 2’ to 3’ below grade.

The

2012 EIR for the proposed Napa County Health and Human Services Agency Campus Project did not identify any previously recorded archaeological resources of significance on the property.

In the event of the discovery of archaeological resources during const ruction,
established protocols will be followed to ensure the appropriate documentation and protection. Th
erefore, the P
roject will

comply with Standard 8.

Standard 9.

New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy histo
ric materials that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the massing, size, scale, ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

15 and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.

The Pro
ject complies with Standard
9 .

The Project does not propose any new additions to the
contributing buildings. Exterior alterations are proposed to the rear (north) facades of Buildings A, B, and C
. The
new
doorways will
require the
r
emoval of only small segments of stucco walls.

The original
wood
doors

have five panels, while the doors in new openings have three panel s
.

Similarly, the new dormer
s

will penetrate the roofline
s
; however, the historic material (clay tile)
is

already

missi
ng. The new dormers will match the size of the original dormers, but the windows

will be different. The original dormers have three multipaned windows, while the new windows will have single panes. Therefore, this new work will

not destroy significant amou
nts
of historic materials that could not be restored and will

be subtly differentiated from the old.

The decks associated with the new entrances on Buildings A and C

and the corridor on Building
B

will be simple in design

and construc
tion to complement but

not mimic the Mission Revival
style.

The new construction with
in

the boundary of the district

principally

includes the Carriage
Building

and Crescent Building.

Only the Crescent Building will be
clearly
visible from Old
Sonoma Road. The Carriage
Buildin
g

as well as the Courtyard

Buildings
, Redwood Building, and
single
-
family houses will

not

be visible from Old Sonoma Road

(see
Figure
19 )
. In any case, all of
the new construction is based upon Northern California architectural traditions.

The Carriage
Bui
lding

and Crescent Building were specifically designed to be compatible with the massing, size, and scale of the contributing buildings.

Instead of Mission Revival, the
new buildings will
take their ques from the Shingle Style
because the buildings that once stood in these general
locations were wood frame and wood clad

with pitched roofs
.

The

new buildings

w
ill

be clad in
cementitious siding with wood trim and details, t
he fenestration
will

consist of wood windows,
the
foundations

and porch
es

will be

stone, and the roof
s

would be clad in asphalt shingles.

Standard 10.

New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in such a manner that if remov
ed in the future, the essential form and integrity of
the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

The Project complies with Standard 10. All elements of the Project have been designed in a manner that is reversible.

T
he Project does no
t propose

any

additions to the contributing
buildings
.

As discussed under Standard 9, m
inor alterations are proposed to the rear (north)
facades of Buildings A, B, and C. I
f the new
doorways and dormer
s

were
removed in the future
,
the essential form and in
tegrity of the
contributing
building
s

would be unimpaired.

The
doorways will require openings in the walls and the dormers will require openings on the roofs .

T
he walls and roofs could be easily restored to their
original configuration
s

with little

if any

physical or visual impact to

the contributing buildings. The new construction with the boundary of the district

principally

includes the Carriage
Building
and C
rescent Building. Although they are
designed as permanent improvements, in the abstract they could be easily removed

in the
future without impairing the integrity of the district because they are free standing.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

16 RECOMMENDATIONS

•

An experienced
practitioner should be consulted regarding the specific treatment of the cut stone in Building B.

•

Test patches of selected cleaning
,
paint removal
,

or consolidation

method
s for the cut
stone in Building B
should be conducted in discrete locations
prior to widespread use.

•

Sandblasting or any other abrasive cleaning methods should not be used to prepare or clean exterior

stucco in Buildings A, B, or C.

•

At the completion of the Project, the National Register District

should be amended

to
exclude the s
ingle
-
family houses and
the
portion of the Courtyard Building within the
boundary following
National Register Bulletin 15, Guidelines for Selecting Boundaries .

CONCLUSION

After review
ing

the

schematic
design
plans pr
epared by Project M+
,
TGHP

has conclud
ed that
the
P
roject

w
ill

comply with the

Standards. The character
-
defining features of the
district

will
be retained and, in some cases, restored. The proposed alterations are limited to those necessary for the change of use and

for

improv
ing the

functiona
lity, accessibility, and safety of
the contributing buildings. The non
-
contributing buildings that will be demolished diminished the historic character of
the district. With one exception, the new non
-
contributing buildings
will not be clearly visible from

Old Sonoma Road. The new non
-
contributing buildings are
consistent with the historical development pattern of the district and co mpatible with

the
architecture of the contributing buildings.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

17 Figure 4: Bird’s eye view, circa 1880
.

Figure 5: Sanborn Map, Sheet 26, 1901.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

18 Figure
6 : Sanborn Map, Sheet
33 , 191
0 .

Figure 7: Building C, South Elevation William H. Corlett, 1912.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

19 Figure 8: Building C, West Elevation William H. Corlett, 1912.

Figure
9 : Sanborn Map, Sheet
33 , 191
0 .

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

20 Figure 10: Building B Floor Plan, C.L. Hunt,
1934.

Figure 11: Building A Floor Plan, C.L. Hunt, 1934.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

21 Figure 12: Proposed Plot Plan, C.L. Hunt, circa 1934.

Figure 13: Sanborn Map, Sheet 3, 1949.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

22 Figure 14
:

Re
-
roofing plan, E.R. Pierce, 1970.

Figure 15: Building B, South Façade,
1973.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

23 Figure 16: Building C, South Façade, 1973.

Figure 17:

Master Plan, 1995.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

24 Figure 18: Proposed treatment of
cut stone in Building B.

02 (E) STONE WALL

REMOVE PAINT VIA NON

DESTRUCTIVE PROCESS

NEW SHOTCRETE WALL PER
STRUCT. MECHANICALY ATTACH

TO (E) STONE WALL
NEW 1/2" PLASTER FINISH

PRIME AND PAINT PER SPEC
NEW 5/8" GYP BD CEILINGP

PRIME AND PAINT PER SPEC

NEW WD CEILING JOIST PER
STRUCT
NEW BASE BD.

PRIME AND PAINT PER SPCE
(E) WD FRAMING TO REMAIN
(E) WD SUB FLOOR TO REMAIN

NEW FINISH FLOOR PER SPEC
NEW CONC. FOOTING

PER STRUCT
(E) WD ROOF JOIST TO REMAIN
NEW 1/2" ROOF SHEATHING

NEW CLAY TILE ROOF
(E) ROOF VENT

TO REMAIN
NEW 1/2" ROOF SHEATHING

LINE OF (E) CEILING REMOVED
(E) RAFTER TAIL

REPAIR AS NEEDED
ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent,
2344 Old Sonoma Road
, Napa

25 Figure 19: Sight Line Studies
,
Moule
&

Pol
y
zoides

Architects,

2022
.

39 Courtyard Condos
ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

ATTACHMENT A

Resume

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

TERESA GRIMES | Historic Preservation

Teresa.

G
[email protected]

323
-
868
-
2391

Teresa Grimes
has
30 years of experience in the field of historic preservation. She is widely recognized as an expert in the identification and evaluation of historical resources having successfully prepared dozens of landmark and historic district applications for a wide v ariety of
property types. Teresa graduated from the University of California with a Master of Art degree in Architecture and has worked in the private, public, and non -
profit sectors.

Maintaining a leadership role from inspection to completion, Teresa has

overseen numerous
rehabilitation and adaptive reuse projects as well as expertly guided property owners through the process of securing Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credits and Mills Act Historic Property Contracts. She has managed the preparation of histor
ic structure reports and worked with
architects and engineers to comply with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

Educational Background

Professional Experience

•

M.A., Architecture, University of
California, Los Angeles, 1992

•

B.A.,
Political Science, University of
California, Los Angeles, 1986

•

Teresa Grimes

|
Historic Preservation,
Principal, 2020
-

Present

•

GPA Consulting, Principal Architectural
Historian, 2009
-
2020

•

Christopher A. Joseph & Associates, Senior
Architectural Historian,

2006
-
2009

•

Teresa Grimes

|
Historic Preservation,
Principal, 1999
-
2005, 1993
-
1994, 1991
-
1992

•

Historic Resources Group, Architectural
Historian, 1994
-
1998

•

Getty Conservation Institute, Research
Associate, 1992
-
1993

•

Los Angeles Conservancy, Preservation
Offi
cer, 1988
-
1991

Qualifications

•

Meets the Secretary of the Interior’s
Professional Qualifications Standards for
history and architectural history pursuant
to the Code of Federal Regulations, 36
CFR Part 61, Appendix A.

Professional Activities

•

Pasadena Heritage Board Member,

2008
-
2012

•

Highland Park Heritage Trust, Board
Member, 1996
-
1998

•

West Hollywood Cultural Heritage
Advisory Board, 1990
-
1994

Federal Rehabilitation Tax Applications

•

Bank of Italy Building/Nomad Hotel, 649 S. Olive Street, Los Angeles, 2015 -
2018
-

Managed Federal
Rehabilitation Tax Credit application and National Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s St
andards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

Breakers Hotel, 200 E. Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach, 2018

–

Managed Part 1 Federal Rehabilitation Tax
Credit application.

•

Casa de R
osas, 2600 S. Hoover Street, Los Angeles, 2017
-
2020
-

Managed Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit
application, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

monitored construction, coordinated approvals with S
tate Office of Historic Preservation and National Park
Service.

•

Elks Lodge No. 99, 607 S. Park View Street, Los Angeles, 2019 -
Ongoing
–

Managed Part 1 and Part 2 Federal
Rehabilitation Tax Credit applications, working with architects and engineers on comp liance with Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards, coordinating approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

Equitable Building, 6253
-
63 Hollywood Boulevard, 1999
-
2000

–

Prepared Part 1 and Part 2 Federal
Rehabilitation
Tax Credit application. Project was sold to developer who did not qualify for program.

•

Executive Office Building, Old Warner Brothers Studio, 5800 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2001 -
2002
-

Prepared Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit application and National Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretar
y of the Interior’s Standards, monitored construction,
coordinated approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

Gerry Building, 910 S. Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, 2001 -
2004
-

Prepared Federal Rehabilitation Tax Cred
it
application and National Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Servi
ce.

•

Hoover Hotel, 7035 Greenleaf Avenue, Whittier, 1999
-
2002
-

Prepared Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit
application and National Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, monitore
d construction, coordinated approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

Hotel Rosslyn Annex, 112 W. 5
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2011
-
2014
-

Managed Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit
application, worked with architects and
engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

Kerckhoff Building and Annex, 121 E. 6
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2001
-
2007

Prepared Federal Rehabilitation Tax
Credit application and National Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with State Office of Hi
storic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

Nirvana Apartments, 1775 N. Orange Drive, Los Angeles, 2018

–

Managed Part 1 Federal Rehabilitation Tax
Credit application.

•

Normandie Hotel, 3600 W. 6
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2011

–

Managed Part 1 Federal Reha
bilitation Tax Credit
application.

•

Old City Hall, 715 Marin Street, Vallejo, 2011
-
2014
-

Managed Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit application
and National Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interi
or’s Standards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

Old Masonic Temple, 707 Marin Street, Vallejo, 2011
-
2014
-

Managed Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit
application and Nation
al Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with State Office of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

•

San Fernando
Building, 400 S. Main Street, Los Angeles, 1999
-
2003

Prepared Federal Rehabilitation Tax
Credit application, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with

State Office of Historic Preservation and
National Park Service.

•

Santa Fe Coast Lines Hospital, 610
-
30 S. St. Louis Street, Los Angeles, 2005

Prepared Part 1 Federal
Rehabilitation Tax Credit application.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

•

Sears, Roebuck & Company National Distribution
Center 2650 E. Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2005

Prepared Part 1 Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit application.

•

Textile Center Building, 315 E. 8
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2004

Prepared Part 1 Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit
application.

•

Western Pacific Building, 1023 S. Broadway Los Angeles, 2015

Managed Part 1 Federal Rehabilitation Tax
Credit application.

•

Young’s Market Company Building, 1610 W. 7
th

Street, Los Angeles,

2002
-
2006

Prepared Federal
Rehabilitation Tax Credit application and National Register nomination, worked with architects and engineers on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, monitored construction, coordinated approvals with State Of
fice of Historic Preservation and National Park Service.

Mills Act Applications

•

20 E. Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, 2019
-

Managed Mills Act application.

•

26 E. Colorado Boulevard, Pasadena, 2019
-

Managed Mills Act application.

•

1111 N. Los Robles Avenue, P
asadena, 2013
-

Managed Mills Act application.

•

1121 N. Los Robles Avenue, Pasadena, 2013
-

Managed Mills Act application.

•

1145 Arden Road, Pasadena, 2020

–

Prepared Mills Act application.

•

Bartlett Building, 215 W. 7
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2016

–

Managed Mi
lls Act application.

•

Edison/El Rey Building, 48 S. Raymond Avenue, Pasadena, 2012

–

Managed Mills Act application.

•

Elks Lodge No. 99, 607 S. Park View Street, Los Angeles, 2020

–

Managed Mills Act application including
Historic Structure Report.

•

Foreman & Clark Building, 701 S. Hill Street, Los Angeles, 2018 –

Managed Mills Act application.

•

Four Gables Apartments, 8250
-
64 Fountain Avenue, West Hollywood, 2019

Managed Mills Act

application.

•

Gerry Building, 910 S. Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, 2002 –

Prepared Mills Act application.

•

Grand Central Market, 317 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, 2020 –

Prepared Mills Act application.

•

Gray Building, 824 S. Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, 2 002
–

Prepared Mills Act application.

•

Hellman Building, 401
-
11 S. Main Street, Los Angeles, 2002
–

Prepared Mills Act application.

•

Hindry House, 718 Prospect Boulevard, Pasadena, 2012

–

Managed Mills Act application.

•

Joannes Brothers Company Building, 800
Traction Avenue, Los Angeles, 2019

–

Managed Mills Act application
including Historic Structure Report.

•

Kerck
h
off Building and Annex, 121 E. 6
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2005

Prepared Mills Act application.

•

Kozy Knook

Court, 830 Brooks Avenue, Pasadena, 2013
-

Managed Mills Act application.

•

M.J. Connell Buildings 1, 2, 3 & 7, 716
-
24 S. Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, 2002

Prepared Mills Act
application.

•

M.J. Connell Buildings 4, 5 & 6, 738
-
46 S. Los Angeles
Street, Los Angeles, 2002

Prepared Mills Act
application.

•

Million Dollar Theater, 307 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, 2020

Managed Mills Act application.

•

Sears, Roebuck & Company National Distribution Center 2650 E. Olympic Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2006

Pre
pared Mills Act application.

•

Taft Building, 1680 Vine Street, Los Angeles, 2012

Prepared Mills Act application.

•

Textile Center Building, 315 E. 8
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2004

Prepared Mills Act application.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards Complia
nce

•

533 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, 2013

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified character
-
defining
features

of historical resource
, and recommended treatment in compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

1000 Avondale Road, San
Marino, 2011

Conducted fieldwork and research, evaluated building as potential historical resource based upon national, state, and local criteria, identified character -
defining features, and
recommended treatment in compliance with Secretary of the Inter ior’s Standards.

•

2 200 Union Avenue
, Los Angeles, 20
21 -

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified character
-
defining
features

of two historical resources in Flower Drive Historic District , reviewed

relocation and

rehabilitation
plans for compliance with

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards

and HPOZ Preservation Plan
, and prepared
memorandum

for C
ategorical Exemption.

•

2500 W. 6
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2010

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified character
-
defining
features

of historical resource
, reviewed rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

4174 Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2010

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified character
-
defining
features

of
historical resource
, reviewed rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

6399 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2015

Conducted fieldwork and research, evaluated building a
s
potential historical resource based upon national, state, and local criteria, identified character -
defining
features, and recommended treatment in compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

9465 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, 2014

Condu
cted fieldwork and research, identified character
-
defining
features, reviewed tenant improvement plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, prepared memorandum for Certificate of Appropriateness.

•

Alexandria Hotel, Los Angeles, 2006

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified character
-
defining
features, reviewed rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

American Society of Cinematographers Clubhouse
, Los Angeles, 2002

Conducted fieldwork and research,
identified character
-
defining features, reviewed rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

Buck Studios, 2626 Lacy
Street, Los Angeles, 2019

–

Managed preparation of memorandum reviewing
rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Clark Hall, Scripps College, Claremont, 2019

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining
features, reviewed rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, prepared memorandum for Certificate of Appropriateness.

•

Coca Cola Building, 963 E. 4
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2014

Conducted fieldwork and

research, evaluated
building as potential historical resource based upon national, state, and local criteria, identified character -
defining features, and recommended treatment in compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Commonwealth Nursery,

Griffith Park, Los Angeles, 2014
-
2016

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining features

of historical resource
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resour ces, and co
-
authored report for Categorical
Exemption.

•

Hillcrest Motor Company, 7001 Hollywood Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2013

Conducted fieldwork and research,
identified character
-
defining features

of historical resource
, advised on compliance with Secre
tary of the
Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

•

Hooper Center, Webb Schools, Claremont, 2018

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining features, reviewed rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, prepared memorandum for Certificate of Appropriateness.

•

Hotel Rosslyn, Los Angeles, 2006

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified ch
aracter
-
defining features

of
historical resource
, reviewed rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

House of Hope, City of Hope, Duarte, 2010

Conducted fieldwork and re
search, identified character
-
defining
features, reviewed adaptive reuse plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, prepared memorandum for Certificate of Appropriateness.

•

Kimberly Service Yard, Scripps College, Claremont, 2019

Condu
cted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining features, reviewed plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, prepared memorandum for Certificate of Appropriateness.

•

Loyola High School, Los Angeles, 2004
–

Conducted fieldwo
rk and research, identified character
-
defining
features of the historic buildings on campus, and prepared design guidelines for new construction.

•

Max Factor Building, 1600 N. Highland Avenue, Los Angeles, 2011

Conducted fieldwork and research,
identified

character
-
defining features

of historical resource
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

Municipal Ferry Building, Port of

Los Angeles, San Pedro, 2019

–

Managed preparation of memorandum
reviewing rehabilitation plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Musicians Union Building, 817 Vine Street, Los Angeles, 2017 -
2020

Conducted fieldwork and research
,
identified character
-
defining features

of historical resource
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

Sears, Roebuck and
Company, Hollywood. 5609 Santa Monica Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2018

Conducted
fieldwork and research, evaluated building as potential historical resource based upon national, state, and local criteria, identified character
-
defining features, and recommend
ed treatment in compliance with
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Seven Seas Building, 6902 Hollywood Boulevard, Los Angeles, 2008

Conducted fieldwork and research,
identified character
-
defining features

of historical resource
, advised on compliance

with Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

Silver Lake Reservoir Master Plan
, Los Angeles, 20
20 -
21 -

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified
char
acter
-
defining features

of cultural landscape
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and co -
authored
technical reports for
Master Plan.

•

Singleton Estate, 384 Delfern Drive
, Los Angeles, 2016

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining features

of cultural landscape
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and prepared re port for Categorical
Exemption.

•

Tokio Florist/Sakai
-
Kozawa Residence
,
2718 Hyperion Avenue
, Los Angeles, 20
20 -
Ongoing

Conducted
fieldwork and research, identified character
-
defining features

of historical resource and cultural landscape
,
advised on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources,

participated in community outreach,

and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

Vi
lla Carlotta, 5959 Franklin Avenue, Los Angeles, 2015
-
2019

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining features

of historical resource
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

Standards, coordinated approvals with Offic
e of Historic Resources,

participated in community outreach,

and
co
-
authored report for Categorical Exemption.

•

United Artist Theater, 933 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, 2011 -
2013
-

Conducted fieldwork and research,
identified character
-
defining features

of his
torical resource
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and prepared report for Categorical Exemption.

•

Willys
-
Knight Building, 425 W. 11
th

Street, Los Angeles, 2013

Cond
ucted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining features

of historical resource
, advised on compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, coordinated approvals with Office of Historic Resources, and co -
authored report for Categorical
E
xemption.

•

W. M. Keck Science Center, Scripps College, Claremont, 2020

Conducted fieldwork and research, identified
character
-
defining features, reviewed addition plans for compliance with Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, prepared memorandum for Ce
rtificate of Appropriateness.

Preservation Treatment Plans and Historic Structure Reports

•

Ahmanson Bank & Trust, Beverly Hills, 2018
-
2019

–

Co
-
conducted fieldwork, managed

preparation of

Preservation Treatment Plan

which included
identifying
character
-
defining features with recommendations for
treatment, reviewed plans for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared memorandum with recommendations and findings.

•

Athens Park Aquatics Facility, Los Angeles County, 2020

–

Manage
d
preparation of
Preservation Treatment
Plan

which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Bradbury Building, Los Angeles, 2016
-
2017

–

Managed
preparation
of
Tenant Improvement Guidelines

which
included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Braly Building/Continental Building, Los Angeles, 2019

–
Managed
preparation
of
Preservation Treatment Plan

which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment, reviewed plans for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared memorandum with recommendations and findings.

•

Charle
s H. Bevis Duplex, Los Angeles 2019
-
2020
-

Managed
preparation of
Preservation Treatment Plan

which
included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Charlotte Chase

Apartments, Los Angeles 2019
-
2020
-

Managed
preparation of
Preservation Treatment Plan

which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Elks Lodge No. 99, 60
7 S. Park View Street, Los Angeles, 2020

–

Managed preparation of Historic Structure
Report summarizing significance of building, chronicling construction history, and identifying character -
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance

the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Farmers & Merchants Bank Building, Los Angeles 2017
-

Managed preparation of Preservation Treatment
Plan

which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel, Los Angeles 2017
-

Managed preparation of Preservation Treatment Plan

which
included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance t he
Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Hughes Industrial Historic District, Los Angeles, 2010

–

Managed project, co
-
conducted fieldwork and
research, co
-
authored Historic Resource Treatment Plan
which included
identifying character
-
defining features
wit
h recommendations for treatment, reviewed specific project plans for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared memoranda with recommendations and findings.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The
Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment A

•

I. Magnin & Company Department Store, Los Angeles 2017
-
Ongoing
-

Co
-
conducted f
ieldwork and research,
managed Preservation Treatment Plan

which included
identifying character
-
defining features with
recommendations for treatment, reviewed plans for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared memorandum with recommen
dations and findings.

•

Jay Littleton Ball Park, Ontario, 2018
-
2019

–

Managed preparation of Historic Structure Report summarizing significance of property, chronicling construction history, and identifying character -
defining features with
recommendations fo
r treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Joannes Brothers Company Building, Los Angeles, 2017
-
2018

–

Managed preparation of Historic Structure
Report summarizing significance of building, chronicling construction history, and id entifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

John Anson Ford Theatres, Los Angeles, 2013
-
2017

–

Co
-
conducted fieldwork and research, managed Historic
Structure Report summ
arizing significance of building, chronicling construction history, and identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards.

•

Los Angeles Stock Exchange, Los Angeles, 2017
-
2018

–

Co
-
conducted fieldwork and research, managed
Preservation Treatment Plan

which included
identifying interior character
-
defining features with
recommendations for treatment, reviewed plans for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared
memorandum with recommendations and findings.

•

Point Fermin Light House, Los Angeles, 1999

–

Conducted fieldwork and research and prepared architectural description, statement of significance, and construction history for Historic Structure Report.

•

Securit
y Trust and Savings Bank Building, Los Angeles, 2020

–

Co
-
conducted fieldwork and research, managed
Preservation Treatment Plan

which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for
treatment, reviewed interior demolition plans fo
r Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared memorandum with recommendations and findings.

•

Sweeten Hall, Rancho Cucamonga, 2019

–

C
o
-
authored Preservation Treatment Plan which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recomm
endations for treatment in compliance the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards
.

•

Westlake Theater, Los Angeles 2018

–

Managed

preparation of
Preservation Treatment Plan which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatme
nt in compliance the Secretary of
the Interior’s Standards.

•

Wholesale Produce Market, Los Angeles, 2007

–

Conducted fieldwork and research and prepared,
Preservation Treatment Plan

which included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations

for
treatment, reviewed plans for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared memorandum with recommendations and findings.

•

Wilshire Tower, Los Angeles, 2020

–

Co
-
conducted fieldwork and research, managed Preservation Treatment Plan

whi
ch included
identifying character
-
defining features with recommendations for treatment, reviewed interior demolition plans for Secretary of the Interior’s Standards compliance, and prepared memorandum with recommendations and findings.

ATTACHMENT 6
Memorandum
–

The Crescent, 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa

Attachment B

ATTACHMENT B

–

Schematic Design Plans

ATTACHMENT 6
birird
The Crescent
2344 Old Sonoma Road

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
DEC 15, 2022
ATTACHMENT 6
1608040 02898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039 [email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
Vicinity Map

VICINITY MAP

OLD SONOMA ROAD

SPRUCE ST

CALVERA CT

WALNUT ST
CA 29

MONROE ST

LEGACY CT

FREDERICK DR

HARTSON ST

S SEYMOUR ST

ORAN CT

S MONTGOMERY ST

GESFORD ST

JEFFERSON ST
ASH ST

MADRONA ST

STEVENSON CT

SUTTER CT

CINNAMOND ST

ELM ST

NRHP BOUNDARY
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
DN
DN
101
104
106
126
128
105
127
103
129
118
125
136
117
119
130
131
132
133
134
135
137
138
139
140
141
142
145
124
108
112
114
143
144
146
123
121
120
107
110
111
113
115
122
109
116
102
B4
ELEV. 31.0
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 31.0
ELEV. 31.0
DN
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 29.9
ELEV. 29.0
ELEV. 28.5
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 31.7
ELEV. 33.5
ELEV. 32.2
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 32.0
ELEV. 31.0
ELEV. 32.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 27.0
ELEV. 26.5
ELEV. 26.7
ELEV. 26.7
ELEV. 26.5
ELEV. 26.3
ELEV. 26.3
ELEV. 29.9
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 34.0
ELEV. 36.0
ELEV. 26.5
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
UP
UP
UP
DN
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 31.0
ELEV. 29.0
ELEV.

30.0 ELEV.

33.0 ELEV.

33.0 Draft Updated Site Plan
0 20 40 80
Old Sonoma Road Housing
11/23/2022
Parking Garage
2237
2238
2250
•

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
BUILDINGS AND USES:

HISTORIC CRESCENT: OPEN SPACE

HISTORIC DORMITORY
BUILDING A(C1*) : RESIDENTIAL USE
3 UNITS

HISTORIC INFIRMARY
BUILDING B(C2*) : COMMERCIAL USE

HISTORIC DORMITORY
BUILDING C(C3*) : RESIDENTIAL USE
3 UNITS

NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
4 UNITS ( NON CONTRIBUTING)

NEW SINGLE FAMIL Y RESIDENCES
8 HOMES ( NON CONTRIBUTING)

NEW COURTYARD BUILDING
100 UNITS ( NON CONTRIBUTING)

NEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
3 UNITS ( NON CONTRIBUTING)
* LETTER DESIGNATION USED IN CEQA

REPOR
T

8 5
7 6
1 2
4 3

NRHP BOUNDARY

SITE PLAN
Site Plan
ATTACHMENT 6
1608040 02898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039 [email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
BUILDING C - DORMITORY, 2022
BUILDING B - INFIRMARY, 2022
BUILDING A - DORMITORY, 2022
Site Section

NRHP BOUNDARY

SITE SECTION

NRHP BOUNDARY

ELM STREET

COURTYARD BUILDNG

HISTORIC BUILDING

HISTORIC CRESCENT

EXISTING RESIDENCE

OLD SONOMA RD
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022

VIEW OF CRESCENT AND BUILDINGS A,B,C (LOOKING NORTH)

VIEW OF SITE FROM OLD SONOMA ROAD (LOOKING NORTH)

VIEW FROM SITES AT OLD SONOMA ROAD (LOOKING SOUTH)
Site Context
ATTACHMENT 6
804020 02898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039 [email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
P:\Drawings\21016-10 HHS Site - Old Sonoma Rd Napa\21016 - Plot Plan.dwg, 12/15/2022 12:09:03 PM, station h, AutoCAD PDF (High Quality Print).pc3
Site Survey
•

NRHP BOUNDARY

SITE SURVEY
ATTACHMENT 6
804020 02898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039 [email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
P:\Drawings\21016-10 HHS Site - Old Sonoma Rd Napa\Email Received\GeoMaps\2022-01-07 Aerial Base\35403.dwg, 1/31/2022 9:43:38 A M, AutoCAD PDF (High Quality Print).pc3, 1:1, Station R

TREE SURVEY

APPENDIX A
–

Tree Survey Table

Ralph Osterling Consultants

Page 8 ends

P (650) 573-8733 E [email protected]

TAG

SPP

DBH

STR

HEALTH

DIA CROWN

COMMENTS

2201
Coast Live Oak 23/23
Fair

Fair

40 Regulated
2202

Syc
amore
23 Fair

Good

35 2203

Pyrus

9 Fair

Fair

15 2204

Pyrus

13 Fair

Fair

15 2205

Redwood
24 Poor

Very
Poor

30 Regulated

2206

Redwood
26 Good

Good

35 Regulated

2207

Oak
9 Fair

Fair

15 2208

Oak
10 Good
Good
20 2209
Pine

38 Fair

Poor

45 Surface Roots

2210

Pine

39 Fair

Poor

30 Surface Roots

2211

Syc
amore
22 Good

Good

35 2212

Syc
amore
47 Fair

Fair

40 2213

Palm

36 Fair

Fair

15 2214

Mulberry
15 Fair

Fair

15 2215

Syc
amore
23 Fair

Fair

25 2216
Syc
amore
33 Fair

Good

30 2217

Redwood
53 Good
Good

45 Regulated

2218

Redwood
32 Good

Good

40 Regulated

2219

Redwood
41 Good

Good

40 Regulated

2220

Syc
amore
36 Fair

Fair

35 2221

Redwood
47 Good

Good

40 Regulated

2222

Syc
amore
22 Fair

Fair

35 2223

Sycamore
22 Fair

Fair

30 2224

Syc
amore
24 Fair

Good

35 2225

Syc
amore

22 Fair

Fair

30 2226

Syc
amore

23 Fair

Fair

30 2227

Syc
amore

23 Fair

Fair

30 APPENDIX A
–

Tree Survey Table

Ralph Osterling Consultants

Page 9 ends

P (650) 573-8733 E [email protected]

TAG

SPP

DBH

STR

HEALTH

DIA CROWN

COMMENTS

2228

Syc
amore

30 Fair

Fair

30 2229

Syc
amore

30 Poor

Poor

25 2230

Redwood
46 Good

Good

45 Regulated

2231

Redwood
44 Good
Good
45 Regulated

2232

Redwood
49 Good

Good

45 Regulated

2233

Plum

27 Poor

Very Poor

15 2234

Plum

31 Poor

Very Poor

15 2235

Ash

11 Poor

Poor

15 2236

Ash

12 Poor

Poor

15 2237

Redwood
36 Good

Fair

40 Regulated

2238

Redwood
39 Good
Fair

40 Regulated

2239

Plum

14 Poor

Poor

15 2240

Plum

11 Poor

Poor

12 2241

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

12 2242
Sweet Gum
9 Fair

Fair

10 2243
Sweet Gum
9 Fair

Fair

10 2244
Sweet Gum
9 Fair

Fair

8 2245
Sweet Gum
11 Fair

Fair

10 2246

Redwood
20 Fair

Poor

30 Regulated

2247

Redwood

21 Good

Fair

25 Regulated

2248

Redwood

21 Good

Good

30 Regulated

2249

Redwood

22 Good

Good

30 Regulated

2250
Redwood

48 Good Good
40 Regulated

2251

Deodar
39 Fair

Fair

40 2252

Sierra Redwood

48 Poor

Very
Poor

35 2253

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

20 2254

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

15 APPENDIX A
–

Tree Survey Table

Ralph Osterling Consultants

Page
10 P (650) 573-8733 E [email protected]

TAG

SPP

DBH

STR

HEALTH

DIA CROWN

COMMENTS

2255
Sweet Gum
9 Fair

Fair

10 2256

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

15 2257

Pyrus

12 Poor

Poor

12 2258

Pyrus

13 Poor

Poor

12 2259

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

10 2260

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

10 2261

Pyrus

13 Poor

Poor

15 2262

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

10 2263

Pyrus

11 Poor

Poor

10 2264

Pyrus

10 Poor

Poor

8 2265

Pyrus

9 Poor

Poor

8 2266

Pyrus

12 Fair

Fair

12 2267

Pyrus

10 Fair

Fair

10 2268

Pyrus

12 Fair

Fair

10 2269
Sweet Gum
14 Fair

Fair

25 2270

Sweet Gum

22 Poor

Poor

20 2271

Sweet Gum

20 Fair

Fair

35 2272

Sweet Gum

18 Fair

Fair

30 2273

Sweet Gum

17 Poor

Poor

30 2274

Sweet Gum

18 Poor

Poor

30 2275

Sweet Gum

17 Poor

Poor

30 2276

Sweet Gum

19 Poor

Poor

30 2277

Sweet Gum

20 Poor

Poor

35 2278
Sweet Gum
12 Poor

Poor

30 2279

Sweet Gum

12 Poor

Poor

30 2280

Sweet Gum

9 Poor

Poor

20 2281

Sweet Gum

10 Fair

Fair

25 APPENDIX A
–

Tree Survey Table

Ralph Osterling Consultants

Page
11 P (650) 573-8733 E [email protected]

TAG

SPP

DBH

STR

HEALTH

DIA CROWN

COMMENTS

2282

Pepper

11 Fair

Fair

20 2283
Sweet Gum
16 Fair

Fair

25 2284

Syc
amore
27 Poor

Poor

40 2285

Redwood
46 Good
Fair

20 Regulated

2286

Redwood
27/16
Good
Good
30 Regulated

Tree Survey
•

NRHP BOUNDARY
ATTACHMENT 6
804020 02898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039 [email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022

DEMO PLAN

DEMO NARRATIVE

REMOVE NON CONTRIBUTING BUILDINGS

AND HARDSCAPE

PROTECT HISTORIC STRUCTURES

PROTECT SPECIMEN TREES AS NOTED IN

TREE SURVEY

Demo Plan

DEMO EXISTING BUILDING

DEMO EXISTING BUILDING
DEMO

EXISTING

BUILDING
DEMO

EXISTING

BUILDING
DEMO

EXISTING

BUILDING
DEMO

EXISTING

BUILDING
DEMO

EXISTING

BUILDING
DEMO

EXISTING

BUILDING
•

NRHP BOUNDARY
ATTACHMENT 6
804020 02898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039 [email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
101
104
106
126
128
105
127
103
129
118
125
136
117
119
130
131
132
133
134
135
137
138
139
140
141
142
145
124
108
112
114
143
144
146
123
121
120
107
110
111
113
115
122
109
116
102
Xref .\Unit Plans\1BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\1BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\1BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\1BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\1BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\1BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH B - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\2BR F A - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH B - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH B - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH B - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH B - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH B - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH B - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH D - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH E - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH E - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH D - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH D - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH D - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH D - 2202 Napa.dwg
Xref .\Unit Plans\3BR TH D - 2202 Napa.dwg
ELEV. 31.0
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 31.0
ELEV. 31.0
DN
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 28.0
ELEV. 29.9
REFR
REFR

REDWOOD/FERN FOREST

EXISTING STANDS OF REDWOOD TREES TO
REMAIN. FERNS AND NATIVE PLANTS PLANTED

AS UNDER STORY

WOOD TIMBER RETAINING WALLS AND WOOD

STEPS AND GRAVEL/DG TREADS

RESAWN TREE LOGS AND STUMPS FROM

DEMOLISHED TREES

GRAVEL OR DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG)
WALKS

DINING TABLE STUMP SEATING BENCHES MADE

FROM ONSITE MILLED DEMOLISHED TREES

HORSE SHOES, BOCCE BALL OR BEANBAG

TOSS OR CHILDERN'S PLAY AREA
2 OAK WOODLAND AND BUTTERFLY GARDEN
EXISTING STANDS OF OAK TREES TO REMAIN.

NEW OAKS AND NATIVE WOODLAND PLANTS AS

UNDER STORY, MILKWEED AND OTHER

MONARCH BUTTERFLY HABITAT PLANTINGS

DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAILS AND

CONCRETE WALKS

PERIMETER FENCE AND SOLAR PANEL

PERGOLA

REAR PATIOS AND COMPOSITE DECKS FOR
CARRIAGE HOUSE AND HISTORICAL BUILDINGS.

SMALL LAWN FOR SUNBATHERS AND

PICNICKING EAST OF CARRIAGE HOUSE
4 SOUTHERN TRANSITION TRAIL

DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL CONNECTOR TO

OAK WOODLAND, CENTRAL MEADOW AND
CRESCENT LAWN FROM REDWOOD FOREST.

VINE COVERED FENCE AND SOLAR PANEL

PERGOLA SCREEN ADJACENT USE
3 ELM STREET/PLACE
ROADWAY WITH INFORMAL TREE PLANTINGS.

WIDE AND NARROW PARKWAYS WITH
OCCASIONAL PARKING OR DROP-OFF AREAS.

BIORETENTION SWALES ALONG THE ROAD AT

WIDER PARKWAYS

EXISTING LARGE OAK AND WALNUT TREES TO
BE RETAINED ON ELM STREET. IN THE SOUTH

LEG OF THE STREET A REDWOOD AND CEDAR
IS BEING ADDITIONALLY RETAINED.
1 EVENT SPACE AND ART CENTER

WOOD DECKS AT FINISH FLOOR LEVEL CONNECT FRONT
AND REAR OF HISTORICAL BUILDINGS.

PERMEABLE PAVERS AT CRESCENT DRIVE ANNOUNCE
ENTRY AND EASTERN PLAZA. EASTERN PLAZA PROVIDES
VEHICULAR ACCESS FOR SUPPLIES. STAIRS AND RAMPS

ELEVATE GUESTS AND RESIDENTS TO DECK LEVELS
A NORTH MEADOW RETAINS TWO REDWOOD TREES.

FROM THE NORTH MEADOW A STAIRCASE AND TRELLIS

SEPARATES THE RESIDENTIAL GREAT LAWN FROM THE
HISTORICAL BUILDINGS.
5 RESIDENTIAL GREAT LAWN

TO THE SOUTH OF THE RESIDENTIAL LAWN, A VINE
COVERED "MAYBECK STYLED" PERGOLA, STAIRS AND

RAMPS CONNECT TO RESIDENTIAL LAWN TO THE EVENT
SPACE MEADOW. A LAWN AND GENTLE MOUNDED BERM
OFFERS A REDWOOD STAND IN THE GREAT LAWN.
6 EXHIBITION SPACE AND SENSORY GARDEN

EXISTING SELECT FEW OF FLOWERING PYRUS TREES AND A

MEANDERING LANDSCAPE CREATES SPACE FOR LOCAL
EXHIBITION. FRAGRANT, FLOWERING AND INTERESTING PLANT

TEXTURES REINFORCE THE SENSORY EXPERIENCE
7 CRESCENT OPEN SPACE

THE ROADWAY RISES UP TO BE A CURBLESS CONDITION AT
THE MAIN HISTORICAL BUILDING.

THE LAWN IS FLUSH WITH THE PERMEABLE PAVERS. THE

GREAT CRESCENT IS BUFFERED BY AN ORNAMENTAL GRASS
GARDEN THAT PARALLES OLD SONORA ROAD. WALKWAYS

DIRECT RESIDENTS AND VISITORS ON THE PERIMETER OF THE
CRESCENT TO MAINTAIN THE LARGE OPEN SPACE.
8 RECALLING THE HISTORICAL USES OF THE SITE AN

INFORMAL ORGANIC ORCHARD OF FRUIT AND NUT TREES
ARE PLANTED ALONG WALKS. HERB, TEAS (YERBA BUENA)

AND MEDICINAL PLANTS ARE USED AS UNDER STORY
PLANTINGS.
9 EXISTING TREES TO BE PRESERVED
10 REDWOOD TREES

OAK TREES

CEDAR TREE

AND OTHER PERIMETER TREES TO BE

PROTECTED IN PLACE

SITE LEGEND

YERBA BUENA ORGANIC ORCHARD AND

WELLNESS GARDEN
1 3
4 4
5 5
7 8
9 5

ELM STREET

OLD SONOMA ROAD
WALNUT
11/22/2022

OLD SONOMA ROAD HOUSING

HERITAGE HOUSING PARTNERS
-

PARTNERS
Landscape Architecture . Planning . Urban Design 31742 Coast Highway
Laguna Beach, California
92651-6974
Tel: 949 645 9444
Fax: 949 715-7286

SITE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
North
60'
0 40'
20'
Graphic Scale In Feet
1 2
3 Landscape Plan

LANDSCAPE PLAN
•

NRHP BOUNDARY
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
DN
DN
UP
DN
UP
DN
UP
UP
DN
UP
01 04
C
A
03 02
B
M29
A401
A29
A401
A301
M29
A302
M29
A301
A29
A302
A29
0' - 8 3/4"
24' - 5 1/2"
28' - 1 1/2"
24' - 4 3/4"
0' - 8 3/4"
0' - 7"
23' - 8 3/4"
19' - 2 3/4"
0' - 7 1/2"
132 SF
BEDROOM #1
73 53 SF
BATH
74 253 SF

KITCHEN
76 361 SF

DINING / LIVING
77 552 SF

DINING / LIVING
78 36 SF
BATH
80 254 SF

KITCHEN
85 360 SF

DINING / LIVING
86 122 SF
BEDROOM #1
83 51 SF
BATH
82 44' - 2"
125 SF
PORCH
98 275 SF

KITCHEN
79 78' - 5 1/4"
CL
CLOSET
CLOSET
97 SF
ENTRY
103
27 SF
STAIR
104
30 SF
STAIR
105
135 SF
ENTRY
106
27 SF
STAIR
107
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A101
Author
222.03.1-A
C1 Historic Building
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD
NAPA, CA 94559

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"
A29

FIRST FLOOR
DN
DN
01 04
C
A
03 02
B
M29
A401
A29
A401
A301
M29
A302
M29
A301
A29
A302
A29
57 SF
BATH
213
254 SF

BEDROOM
211
CLOSET
122 SF

BEDROOM
221
48 SF
BATH
222
53 SF
BATH
223
248 SF

BEDROOM
224
57 SF
BATH
232
CLOSET
56 SF
STAIR
210
73 SF
STAIR
220
56 SF
STAIR
230
254 SF

BEDROOM
231
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A102
Author
222.03.1-A
C1 Historic Building
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD
NAPA, CA 94559

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"
A29

SECOND FLOOR
01 04
C
A
03 02
B
3' - 4"
24' - 6"
28' - 2"
24' - 5"
3' - 4"
83' - 8"
3' - 4"
23' - 9"
19' - 3"
3' - 5"
49' - 8"
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A103
Author
222.03.1-A
C1 Historic Building
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD
NAPA, CA 94559

ROOF PLAN
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"
A29

ROOF PLAN
UNIT 1:
1,250 SF*

2 BEDROOM, 2 BATH
UNIT 2:
1,425 SF*

2 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH
UNIT 3:
1,250 SF*

2 BEDROOM, 2 BATH
*
AREA MEASURE TO INTERIOR FACE OF WALL AT 7’-6” HEAD HEIGHT BUILDING A : PROPOSED PLANS
1 2
3 3
4 4
4 5
5 6
6 7
7 8
8 8
8 9
9 9
10 10
10 10
11 12
13 13
13 14
14 REMOVE (E) RAMPS STAIRS AND PIPE
RAILING TYP.

REMOVE (E) INFILL WINDOWS AT (E)

ENTRY PORCH

RESTORE WOOD WINDOWS AT ENTRY

PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE STAIR AND

RAILING AT FRONT ENTRY
REMOVE (E) ASPHALT SHINGLES.

RESTORE TILE ROOF PER HISTORIC
IMAGES. REPAIR RAFTER TAILS AND
INTEGRAL GUTTER AS REQUIRED.

RESTORE (E) WINDOWS. NEW WOOD

WINDOWS TO MATCH (E) DIVIDED

LIGHTS, OVERHEAD OPERATION

RESTORE ENTRY PORCH ARCHWAYS AT
THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

PROVIDE NEW ENTRY DOORS AND

TRANSOM TO UNITS AT (E) WINDOW

LOCATION ON BACK OF BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW STAIR AND RAISED

DECK AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW DORMERS TO MATCH
(E) AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

UNCOVER INFILL WINDOWS WHERE

FEASIBLE, PROVIDE NEW WOOD

WINDOW TO MATCH (E)

REP

AIR BASEMENT WINDOW VENTS TO

MATCH (E)

LOCATE HVAC EQUIPMENT BELOW DECK

INFILL JULLIETE BALCONY AT EXISTING

DOOR OPENING

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
Building A Plans
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
11/1/2022 7:28:10 PM
10/18/2022 5:31:40 PM
28'-0"
28'-0"
1 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
5 5
5 6
6 6
6 6
7 7
8 8
8 9
9 9
10 10
10 10
10 10
11 12
12 13
14 14
14 13
13 5' - 3"
7/13/2022 1:10:22 PM
28'-0"
28'-0"
28'-0"

EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION

BUILDING A : EXISTING/PROPOSED ELEVATIONS

REMOVE (E) RAMPS STAIRS AND PIPE
RAILING TYP.

REMOVE (E) INFILL WINDOWS AT (E)

ENTRY PORCH

RESTORE WOOD WINDOWS AT ENTRY

PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE STAIR AND

RAILING AT FRONT ENTRY
REMOVE (E) ASPHALT SHINGLES.

RESTORE TILE ROOF PER HISTORIC
IMAGES. REPAIR RAFTER TAILS AND
INTEGRAL GUTTER AS REQUIRED.

RESTORE (E) WINDOWS. NEW WOOD

WINDOWS TO MATCH (E) DIVIDED

LIGHTS, OVERHEAD OPERATION

RESTORE ENTRY PORCH ARCHWAYS AT
THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

PROVIDE NEW ENTRY DOORS AND

TRANSOM TO UNITS AT (E) WINDOW

LOCATION ON BACK OF BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW STAIR AND RAISED

DECK AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW DORMERS TO MATCH
(E) AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

UNCOVER INFILL WINDOWS WHERE

FEASIBLE, PROVIDE NEW WOOD

WINDOW TO MATCH (E)

REP

AIR BASEMENT WINDOW VENTS TO

MATCH (E)

LOCATE HVAC EQUIPMENT BELOW DECK

INFILL JULLIETE BALCONY AT EXISTING

DOOR OPENING

NORTH ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION

EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION
1 2
5 1
11 12
1 Building A Elevations
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
UP
UP
UP
UP
DN
Range
01 02
03 04
07 08
05 06
A
B
C
D
E
F
6' - 10"
30' - 0 1/2"
32' - 8"
17' - 9 1/2"
28' - 10"
17' - 4 1/2"
14' - 7"
7' - 9"
7' - 11"
31' - 5 1/2"
14' - 0"
13' - 3"
CAFE
108

KITCHEN
109
OFFICE
110
STUDIO
114
STUDIO
115

ART STUDIO
117
DECK
106
EVENT
101
ENTRY
100
PORCH
118
WC
104
WC
105
CLOSET
102
148' - 1 1/2"
74' - 4"
WC
112
STAIR
116
STAIR
107
13' - 1 1/2"
-1'-0" LOW
-0'-4" LOW
0'-0" LOW
-1'-0" LOW
-1'-0" LOW
-1'-0" LOW
0'-0" LOW
0'-0" LOW
0'-0" LOW
0'-0" LOW
0'-0" LOW
OFFICE
82 STUDIO
STUDIO
206
STUDIO
207

BACK OF HOUSE
208
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A101
Author
222.03.1-B
Napa Historic
Building B
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD,
NAPA, CA 94559

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Checker
3/16" = 1'-0"
A25

FIRST FLOOR
DN
01 02
03 04
07 08
05 06
A
B
C
D
E
F
6' - 10"
30' - 0 1/2"
32' - 8"
17' - 9 1/2"
28' - 10"
17' - 4 1/2"
14' - 7"
148' - 1 1/2"
7' - 9"
7' - 11"
31' - 5 1/2"
14' - 0"
13' - 3"
74' - 4"
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A102
Author
222.03.1-B
Napa Historic
Building B
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD,
NAPA, CA 94559

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Checker
3/16" = 1'-0"
A25

SECOND FLOOR
01 02
03 04
07 08
05 06
A
B
C
D
E
F
6' - 10"
30' - 0 1/2"
32' - 8"
17' - 9 1/2"
28' - 10"
17' - 4 1/2"
14' - 7"
148' - 1 1/2"
7' - 9"
7' - 11"
31' - 5 1/2"
14' - 0"
13' - 3"
74' - 4"
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A103
Author
222.03.1-B
Napa Historic
Building B
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD,
NAPA, CA 94559

ROOF PLAN
Checker
3/16" = 1'-0"
A25

ROOF PLAN
1 2
3 4
5 5
6 7
7 8
9 9
9 10
10 10
11 12
12 REMOVE (E) RAMPS STAIRS AND PIPE
RAILING TYP.

REMOVE (E) INFILL WINDOWS AT (E)

ENTRY PORCH

RESTORE ENTRY PORCH DETAILING

INCLUDING ARCHWAYS

PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE STAIR AND

RAILING AT FRONT ENTRY
REMOVE (E) ASPHALT SHINGLES.

RESTORE TILE ROOF PER HISTORIC
IMAGES. REPAIR RAFTER TAILS AND
INTEGRAL GUTTER AS REQUIRED.

RESTORE (E) WINDOWS. NEW WOOD

WINDOWS TO MATCH (E) DIVIDED

LIGHTS, OVERHEAD OPERATION

UNCOVER INFILL WINDOWS WHERE

FEASIBLE, PROVIDE NEW WOOD

WINDOW TO MATCH (E)

REP

AIR BASEMENT WINDOW VENTS TO

MATCH (E)

PROVIDE NEW ENTRY DOORS AND

TRANSOM TO UNIT AT (E) WINDOW
LOCATION.

REMOVE NONCONFORMING

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND SCREENS
WHERE FEASIBLE.

REMOVE INFILL WALL AT BACK OF

BUILDING AS INDICATED

PROVIDE NEW / EXPANDED RAISED
PORCH AT BACK OF BUILDING.

REMOVE (E) RAMP AT BACK OF

BUILDING

REPAIR/ REFINSH (E) STONE

FOUNDATION

LOCATE HVAC EQUIPMENT BELOW DECK

NEW ADA RAMP AND RAISED DECK
13 14
14 15
16 16
16 15

OPEN TO BELOW
BUILDING B : PROPOSED PLANS

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
Building B Plans
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
7/13/2022 12:55:02 PM
32'-3"
27'-11"
28'-11"
11/22/2022 3:12:13 PM
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12

REMOVE (E) RAMPS STAIRS AND PIPE
RAILING TYP.

REMOVE (E) INFILL WINDOWS AT (E)

ENTRY PORCH

RESTORE ENTRY PORCH DETAILING

INCLUDING ARCHWAYS

PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE STAIR AND

RAILING AT FRONT ENTRY
REMOVE (E) ASPHALT SHINGLES.

RESTORE TILE ROOF PER HISTORIC
IMAGES. REPAIR RAFTER TAILS AND
INTEGRAL GUTTER AS REQUIRED.

RESTORE (E) WINDOWS. NEW WOOD

WINDOWS TO MATCH (E) DIVIDED

LIGHTS, OVERHEAD OPERATION

UNCOVER INFILL WINDOWS WHERE

FEASIBLE, PROVIDE NEW WOOD

WINDOW TO MATCH (E)

REP

AIR BASEMENT WINDOW VENTS TO

MATCH (E)

PROVIDE NEW ENTRY DOORS AND

TRANSOM TO UNIT AT (E) WINDOW
LOCATION.

REMOVE NONCONFORMING

MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND SCREENS
WHERE FEASIBLE.

REMOVE INFILL WALL AT BACK OF

BUILDING AS INDICATED

PROVIDE NEW / EXPANDED RAISED
PORCH AT BACK OF BUILDING.

REMOVE (E) RAMP AT BACK OF

BUILDING

REPAIR/ REFINSH (E) STONE

FOUNDATION

LOCATE HVAC EQUIPMENT BELOW DECK

NEW RAISED WOOD DECK AND ADA
RAMP
13 14
15 16
BUILDING B : EXISTING/PROPOSED ELEVATIONS
7/13/2022 12:55:02 PM
32'-3"
27'-11"
28'-11"
5 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION

PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION
1 2
3 4
5 6
9 10
7/13/2022 1:15:37 PM
32'-11"
27'-11"
28'-11"
7/13/2022 1:15:37 PM
32'-11"
27'-11"
28'-11"

EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION

PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION
5 11
12 13
13 11
12 10
10 14
15 16
Building B Elevations
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
DN
DN
P102
1 A302
M29
A301
M29
128 SF

BEDROOM
226
47 SF
BATH
225
218 SF

BEDROOM
223
253 SF

BEDROOM
212
257 SF

BEDROOM
232
49 SF
BATH
213
49 SF
BATH
231
A301
A29
A302
A29
M29
A401
84' - 3"
50' - 2 1/2"
78' - 3"
37' - 1"
60 SF
STAIR
210
CLOSET
118 SF
STAIR
220
CLOSET
CLOSET
57 SF
STAIR
230
CLOSET
A29
A401
01 02
03 04
A
B
C
59 SF
BATH
224
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A102
Author
222.03.1-C
Napa Historic
Building C
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD
NAPA, CA 94559

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"
A29

SECOND FLOOR PLAN
UP
UP
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
DN
D
W
W
D
D
W
P102
1 A302
M29
A301
M29
A301
A29
A302
A29
M29
A401
44' - 2 1/2"
78' - 3"
438 SF
LIVING
112
170 SF

KITCHEN
113
45 SF
CORR
117
CLOSET
119 SF

BEDROOM
115
54 SF
BATH
116
97 SF
ENTRY
110
29 SF
STAIR
111
36 SF
BATH
121
567 SF
LIVING
123
238 SF

KITCHEN
125
71 SF
ENTRY
130
53 SF
BATH
131
133 SF

BEDROOM
132
22 SF
CLOSET
133
171 SF

KITCHEN
134
438 SF
LIVING
135
37 SF
CORR
136
28 SF
STAIR
138
CLOSET
A29
A401
01 02
03 04
A
B
C
125 SF
PORCH
60 0' - 7 1/2"
23' - 4"
19' - 7 1/2"
0' - 7 1/2"
0' - 7 1/2"
24' - 6"
27' - 3 1/2"
25' - 2"
0' - 7 1/2"
CLOSET
61 CLOSET
62 STAIR
63 C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ARCHITECT
2898 Rowena Ave Suite 102
Los Angeles, CA 90039
T 323 284 8921
www.projectmplus.com
C
D
E
stamp:
25 26
27 28
29 M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
A101
Author
222.03.1-C
Napa Historic
Building C
2344 OLD SONOMA ROAD
NAPA, CA 94559

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"
A29

FIRST FLOOR PLAN
BUILDING C : PROPOSED PLANS
01 04
C
A
03 02
B
3' - 4"
24' - 6"
28' - 2"
24' - 5"
3' - 4"
83' - 8"
3' - 4"
23' - 9"
19' - 3"
3' - 5"
49' - 8"
C

PROJECT M PLUS CORP
A
G
K
J
H
L
10 23
22 21
20 19
18 17
16 15
14 13
12 11
09 08
07 05
06 04
03 02
01 24
DATE
No.

ISSUED FOR
F
B
PROJECT NO:

DRAWN BY:

CHECKED BY:

PERMIT NO:

SHEET TITLE:

ROOF PLAN
Checker
1/4" = 1'-0"
A29

ROOF PLAN
UNIT 1:
1,250 SF*

2 BEDROOM, 2 BATH
UNIT 2:
1,425 SF*

2 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH
UNIT 3:
1,250 SF*

2 BEDROOM, 2 BATH
*
AREA MEASURE TO INTERIOR FACE OF WALL AT 7’-6” HEAD HEIGHT 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 3
4 4
5 6
7 8
8 8
9 9
10 10
10 13
13 14
14 REMOVE (E) RAMPS STAIRS AND PIPE
RAILING TYP.

REMOVE (E) INFILL WINDOWS AT (E)

ENTRY PORCH

RESTORE WOOD WINDOWS AT ENTRY

PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE STAIR AND

RAILING AT FRONT ENTRY
REMOVE (E) ASPHALT SHINGLES.

RESTORE TILE ROOF PER HISTORIC
IMAGES. REPAIR RAFTER TAILS AND
INTEGRAL GUTTER AS REQUIRED.

RESTORE (E) WINDOWS. NEW WOOD

WINDOWS TO MATCH (E) DIVIDED

LIGHTS, OVERHEAD OPERATION

RESTORE ENTRY PORCH ARCHWAYS AT
THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

PROVIDE NEW ENTRY DOORS AND

TRANSOM TO UNITS AT (E) WINDOW

LOCATION ON BACK OF BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW STAIR AND RAISED

DECK AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW DORMERS TO MATCH
(E) AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

UNCOVER INFILL WINDOWS WHERE

FEASIBLE, PROVIDE NEW WOOD

WINDOW TO MATCH (E)

REP

AIR BASEMENT WINDOW VENTS TO

MATCH (E)

LOCATE HVAC EQUIPMENT BELOW DECK

INFILL JULLIETE BALCONY AT EXISTING

DOOR OPENING

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

ROOF PLAN
Building C Plans
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
10/18/2022 5:31:40 PM
28'-0"
28'-0"
11/1/2022 7:28:10 PM
5' - 3"
7/13/2022 1:10:22 PM
28'-0"
28'-0"
28'-0"

EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 BUILDING C : EXISTING/PROPOSED ELEVATIONS

NORTH ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION
3 4
5 5
5 5
6 6
6 6
7 8
8 9
9 10
10 10
10 10
12 13
13 14
14 REMOVE (E) RAMPS STAIRS AND PIPE
RAILING TYP.

REMOVE (E) INFILL WINDOWS AT (E)

ENTRY PORCH

RESTORE WOOD WINDOWS AT ENTRY

PROVIDE NEW CONCRETE STAIR AND

RAILING AT FRONT ENTRY
REMOVE (E) ASPHALT SHINGLES.

RESTORE TILE ROOF PER HISTORIC
IMAGES. REPAIR RAFTER TAILS AND
INTEGRAL GUTTER AS REQUIRED.

RESTORE (E) WINDOWS. NEW WOOD

WINDOWS TO MATCH (E) DIVIDED

LIGHTS, OVERHEAD OPERATION

RESTORE ENTRY PORCH ARCHWAYS AT
THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.

PROVIDE NEW ENTRY DOORS AND

TRANSOM TO UNITS AT (E) WINDOW

LOCATION ON BACK OF BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW STAIR AND RAISED

DECK AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

PROVIDE NEW DORMERS TO MATCH
(E) AT EACH UNIT ON THE BACK OF

BUILDING

UNCOVER INFILL WINDOWS WHERE

FEASIBLE, PROVIDE NEW WOOD

WINDOW TO MATCH (E)

REP

AIR BASEMENT WINDOW VENTS TO

MATCH (E)

LOCATE HVAC EQUIPMENT BELOW DECK

INFILL JULLIETE BALCONY AT EXISTING

DOOR OPENING
Building C Elevations

EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION
1 2
5 1
11 12
1 ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022

EXISTING DETAILS

MATERIALS
1 CLAY TILE ROOF: MISSION BARREL

RAISED HIP CAP

SHAPED WOOD RAFTER TAIL

EIGHT OVER TWO DIVIDED LIGHT WINDOW

EIGHT OVER FOUR DIVIDED LIGHT
WINDOW

FIVE PANEL DOOR EXTERIOR / INTERIOR

DIVIDED LIGHT DOOR WITH TRANSOM

EXTERIOR
STONE BLOCK BASE : REMOVE PAINT / REPAIR

MID COURSE STUCCO DETAIL

METAL CRAWL SPACE VENTS
1 2
3 4
5 CLAY TILE ROOF

SMOOTH STUCCO / OFF WHITE

BASE STUCCO / PUTTY
METAL: OIL RUBBED BRONZE
WINDOW AND DOORS PT :

PUTTY GREEN / ALT GREY BLUE
CONCRETE: ACID ETCH

MATERIALS AND DETAILS
2 1
2 3
3 4
4 5
5 6
6 7
7 8
8 9
9 10
10 2
3 4
4 ALT
5 1
BUILDING B - INFIRMARY, 1973
BUILDING C - DORMITORY, 1973
Materials
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
BUILDING A&C: RENDERED ELEVATIONS
1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2
6 3
3 3
5 4
5 4
4 4
4 2
1 3
4 5
6 MATERIALS:

CLAY TILE ROOF

SMOOTH STUCCO / OFF WHITE

BASE STUCCO / PUTTY
METAL: OIL RUBBED BRONZE
WINDOW AND DOORS PT :

PUTTY GREEN / ALT GREY BLUE
CONCRETE: ACID ETCH

WOOD DECK

NORTH ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION

WEST ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION
Building A&C Rendered Elevation
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022
BUILDING B : RENDERED ELEVATIONS

EAST ELEVATION

NORTH ELEVATION

SOUTH ELEVATION
2 1
3 4
5 6
MATERIALS:

CLAY TILE ROOF

SMOOTH STUCCO / OFF WHITE

BASE STUCCO / PUTTY
METAL: OIL RUBBED BRONZE
WINDOW AND DOORS PT :

PUTTY GREEN / ALT GREY BLUE
CONCRETE: ACID ETCH

WOOD DECK

WEST ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION
1 1
2 2
6 4
4 3
5 5
5 1
1 2
2 4
4 Building B Rendered Elevation
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022

NEW NON-CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES

CARRIAGE BUILDING

EAST ELEVATION
•

NRHP BOUNDARY
8 7
6 5
New Non-Contributing Structures
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022

CRESCENT

BUILDING

NEW NON-CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES
•

NRHP BOUNDARY
8 7
6 5
New Non-Contributing Structures

WEST ELEVATION
ATTACHMENT 6
2898 ROWENA AVENUE #102 — SILVER LAKE, CA — 90039
[email protected] — 323.284.8921 — PROJECTMPLUS.COM 168 4 0
1/8” = 1’-0”NN

OLD SONOMA ROAD, HOUSING

NAPA, CA

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
15 DECEMBER 2022

NEW NON-CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES
New Non-Contributing Structures
20 Old Sonoma Road Housing Study
30 September 2022
© moule & polyzoides, architects and urbanists
all

drawings

are

conceptual

nature

and

not

verified

survey
.
not

for

construction
0 8’ 16’

NON CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES
7: COURTYARD CONDO BUILDING

SOUTH ELEVATION

NON CONTRIBUTING STRUCTURES
6: SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS
•

NRHP BOUNDARY
8 7
6 5

NORTH ELEVATION

EAST ELEVATION
ATTACHMENT 6

Napa City CouncilMay 2, 2023

Napa City Council
May 2, 2023