955 School Street
Napa, CA 94559
www.cityofnapa.org
CITY OF NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
Mayor Scott Sedgley
Vice Mayor Beth Painter
Councilmember Liz Alessio
Councilmember Mary Luros
Councilmember Bernie Narvaez
3:30 PM City Hall Council ChambersTuesday, November 7, 2023 3:30 PM Afternoon Session
6:30 PM Evening Session
3:30 P.M. AFTERNOON SESSION
1. CALL TO ORDER: 3:32 P.M.
1.A. Roll Call:
Councilmember Alessio, Councilmember Luros, Councilmember Narvaez, Vice Mayor Painter, and Mayor Sedgley
Present: 5 -
2. AGENDA REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS:
City Clerk Carranza announced the following supplemental items:
Item 4. - Email from Maureen Trippe and Joyce Stavert.
Items 6.A., 6.B. and 6.C. - PowerPoint Presentations.
(Copies of all supplemental documents are included in Attachment 1)
3. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS:
3.A. 379-2023
Arbor Day
Mayor Sedgley and members of Council read the proclamation. Jeff Gittings, Parks and Urban Forestry Manager, accepted the proclamation and provided remarks.
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
4. PUBLIC COMMENT:
(See supplemental document in Attachment 1)
Pat Burrows, President of the Napa City Firefighters Association - provided comments to encourage Council to fund staffing of Engine 1 with three additional full-time staff members.
Jim Hinton - Thanked Napa Firefighters for response to calls and provided comments regarding Visit Napa Valley salaries. He would like to see funds spent towards activities for local children or parks maintenance.
Assistant City Manager Liz Habkirk introduced Joana De Sousa, Management Fellow, in the City Manager's Office. Ms. De Sousa provided brief remarks.
5. CONSENT CALENDAR:
Approval of the Consent Agenda
A motion was made by Councilmember Alessio, seconded by Councilmember Narvaez, to approve the Consent Agenda with item 5.I. pulled for public comment. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Luros, Narvaez, Painter, and Sedgley5 -
5.A. 405-2023
City Council Meeting Minutes
Approved the minutes from the October 17, 2023 Regular Meeting of the City Council.
5.B. 407-2023 City Manager’s Office Staffing Plan Update (Amending Napa Municipal Code Section 2.08.090 regarding the designation of appointive officers in the City Manager’s Office)
Approved the second reading and final passage and adopted Ordinance O2023-011 amending Napa Municipal Code Section 2.08.090 regarding the designation of appointive officers in the City Manager’s Office.
Enactment No: O2023-011
5.C. 406-2023
2024 City Council Calendar
Adopted Resolution R2023-116 establishing the 2024 Calendar for Regular City Council Meetings and City Holidays, and approving the cancellations of regular meetings of the City Council on January 2, 2024, July 2, 2024, and November 6, 2024.
Enactment No: R2023-116
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
5.D. 418-2023 Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee (CDBG) Membership
1. Reappointed incumbents, Karina O’Briain, Harry Collamore, Robert J. Van Der Velde and Virginia A. Young, to the Community Development Block Grant Advisory Committee (CDBG) for terms effective immediately and ending September 30, 2026; and
2. Corrected the term end dates for Committee Members Richard Tippitt and Jennifer Ancona to September 30, 2025.
5.E. 395-2023
OpenGov, Inc. eProcurement Software
Authorized the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No.
C2020-138 with OpenGov, Inc. in the amount of $207,335 for the purchase of an integrated web-based electronic procurement platform, implementation services, and support services, for a 3-year term.
5.F. 400-2023
Classification Plan and Salary for Scale House Supervisor in the Utilities Department
Adopted Resolution R2023-117 amending the City Classification Plan by adopting the new classification specification and salary range for Scale House Supervisor; and amending the Budget Staffing Plan by adding one (1) Scale House Supervisor position, and deleting one (1) Senior Scale House Attendant position.
Enactment No: R2023-117
5.G. 401-2023
Classification Plan and Salary for Stormwater Program Coordinator in the Public Works Department
Adopted Resolution R2023-118 amending the City Classification Plan by adopting the new classification specification and salary range for Stormwater Program Coordinator; and amending the Budget Staffing Plan by adding one (1) Stormwater Program Coordinator position, and deleting one (1) Engineering Assistant position.
Enactment No: R2023-118
5.H. 402-2023
Classification Plan and Salary for Senior Transportation Planner in the Public Works Department
Adopted Resolution R2023-119 amending the City Classification Plan by adopting the new classification specification and salary range for Senior Transportation Planner; and amending the Budget Staffing Plan by adding one (1) Senior Transportation Planner position, and deleting one (1) Transportation Planner II position.
Enactment No: R2023-119
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
5.I. 403-2023 Classification Plan and Salary for Senior Traffic Engineer in the Public Works Department
The item was pulled by Maureen Trippe, Slow Down Napa, who provided public comment. Ms. Trippe voiced disappoint that specific verbiage to address traffic calming was not included in the specification.
Julie Lucido, Public Works Director, and Heather Ruiz, Human Resources, provided a brief report.
Brief Council comments ensued.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Painter, seconded by Councilmember Alessio, to adopt Resolution R2023-120 amending the City Classification Plan by adopting the revised classification specification and salary range for Senior Traffic Engineer in the Public Works Department. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Luros, Narvaez, Painter, and Sedgley5 -
Enactment No: R2023-120
5.J. 384-2023
American Canyon Fire Protection District Agreement
Authorized the Police Chief to execute a five-year contract (C2023-680) for Public Safety Dispatching Services between the City of Napa and the American Canyon Fire Protection District (ACFPD).
5.K. 399-2023
Body Worn Cameras and Digital Evidence Management for the Police Department-Update
Adopted Resolution R2023-121 authorizing the Police Chief to execute an agreement with Axon Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $1,594,238.43, for a five-year term to purchase body worn cameras, a digital evidence management system, and taser electronic control devices and rescinding Resolution R2023-115.
Enactment No: R2023-121
5.L. 388-2023
Fire Station Alerting System Replacement
Authorized the Assistant City Manager to execute a contract in an amount not-to-exceed $510,000 with Westnet to replace the alerting systems for all five City Fire Stations and determine that the exception for procurement via existing contracts of other public agencies in Napa Municipal Code Section 2.91.060 applies to the contract.
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
5.M. 389-2023 Radio Network Site Connectivity
Authorized the Assistant City Manager to execute an agreement with Vision Communications for a not to exceed amount of $300,000 to install and maintain a Public Safety data network and determine that (1) the exception for procurement via existing contracts of other public agencies in Napa Municipal Code Section
2.91.060 applies to the Public Safety data network; and (2) the actions authorized by this item are exempt from CEQA.
5.N. 393-2023
Rose Lane Sewer Separation - Reimbursement Agreement with the Napa Sanitation District
Adopted Resolution R2023-122 authorizing the Public Works Director to execute on behalf of the City a Reimbursement Agreement with the Napa Sanitation District in an amount of up to $300,000 to reimburse the District for a portion of the cost to construct a sewer separation project on Rose Lane in the City of Napa; amending the Capital Improvement Plan as Documented in Council Budget Amendment No. 2P5; and determining that the actions authorized by this resolution are exempt from CEQA.
Enactment No: R2023-122
5.O. 361-2023
SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant Program
Adopted Resolution R2023-123 authorizing the Utilities Director, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to implement and secure payment for the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) SB 1383 Local Assistance Grant in an amount not to exceed $175,000.
Enactment No: R2023-123
5.P. 394-2023
On-Call Water Engineering Professional Services
Authorized the Utilities Director to execute agreements with Carollo Engineers, Inc., GEI Consultants, Inc., HDR Engineering, Inc., West Yost Associates, Inc., and Wood Rodgers, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $500,000 each, for on-call water engineering professional services.
6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
6.A. 271-2023 Outside Water Service to Vintage High School Culinary and Agricultural Facility
(See supplemental document in Attachment 1)
Utilities Director Phil Brun provided the report. He also shared that Mike Pearson, Napa Valley Unified School District, and Brendon Freeman, Napa LAFCO, were also in attendance and available to respond to questions.
Mayor Sedgley called for public comment; there were no requests to speak.
Discussion was turned over to Council; individual comments and questions ensued.
A motion was made by Councilmember Narvaez, seconded by Vice Mayor Painter, to adopt Resolution R2023-124: (1) supporting Napa Valley Unified School District's application to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County to amend the City's sphere of influence to include the northern portion of 1130 Trower Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number 038-040-020); (2) authorizing the Utilities Director to execute a Declaration of Covenants and Agreement Regarding Water Service with the Napa Valley Unified School District to provide water service to 1130 Trower Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number 038-040-020) for the Vintage High School Culinary and Agricultural Facility; (3) authorizing the Utilities Director to submit an application to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County for an outside service agreement; and (4) determining that the actions authorized by this resolution were adequately analyzed by a previous CEQA action or are exempt from CEQA. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Luros, Narvaez, Painter, and Sedgley5 -
Enactment No: R2023-124
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
6.B. 360-2023 Equal Employment Opportunity Annual Report, and Equity and Inclusion Plan - 2022/2023
(See supplemental document in Attachment 1)
Heather Ruiz, Human Resources Director introduced the item. MJ Tueros, Human Resources Manager, provided the report.
Mayor Sedgley called for public comment; there were no requests to speak.
Discussion was turned over to Council; individual comments and questions ensued.
A motion was made by Vice Mayor Painter, seconded by Councilmember Alessio, to adopt Resolution R2023-125 approving the 2022 Equal Employment Opportunity Annual Report and approving the 2023 Equity and Inclusion Plan. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Luros, Narvaez, Painter, and Sedgley5 -
Enactment No: R2023-125
6.C. 371-2023
Treasurer’s Quarterly Investment Report on the City’s Investment Portfolio for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2023
(See supplemental document in Attachment 1)
Paul Phangureh, Deputy Finance Director, introduced the item. Monique Spyke, Managing Director, PFM Asset Management LLC, provided the report.
Mayor Sedgley called for public comment; there were no requests to speak.
Discussion was turned over to Council; brief individual questions and comments ensued.
7. CONSENT HEARINGS:
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
Approval of the Consent Agenda
Mayor Sedgley announced the consent hearings.
He also provided brief comments regarding Mills Act Agreements and questioned impacts of potential future agreements.Councilmember Alessio provided comments suggesting a review of the Historic Resource Index.
There were no requests to speak from members of the public; the hearings were opened and closed without comment.
A motion was made by Councilmember Alessio, seconded by Councilmember Luros, to approve the Consent Hearing Agenda. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Luros, Narvaez, Painter, and Sedgley5 -
7.A. 385-2023
Preservation of Qualified Historical Property at 2165 Lone Oak Avenue Authorized the Community Development Director, on behalf of the City, to execute a Mills Act Historic Preservation Agreement with Tom and Jeanne Andrews, trustees of the Andrews Family Trust dated May 18, 2001, for the Local Landmark property at 2165 Lone Oak Avenue.
7.B. 386-2023
Preservation of Qualified Historical Property at 1206 Oak Street Authorized the Community Development Director, on behalf of the City, to execute a Mills Act Historic Preservation Agreement with Bob Stroub, trustee of the Robert Marshall Stroup Revocable Trust dated 10/15/2020, for the Local Landmark property at 1206 Oak Street.
8. PUBLIC COMMENT: None (public comment was called during item 4)
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
9. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER:
City Manager Potter shared that in the first quarter of 2024 staff would be bringing an item to Council to discuss City parks inventory. Additionally, he shared that staff was working on securing the Napa Valley Expo for the July 4, 2024 event.
Councilmember Narvaez invited members of the public to attend the Veteran's Day service at Veteran's Memorial Park at 11:00 A.M. on November 11, 2023. He also acknowledged the Marine Corps birthday, November 10, 2023.
Councilmember Alessio invited members of the public to attend a community education event on Veteran's suicide and survivors guilt on November 13, 2023 from 6:30 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. at the Napa Valley College Performing Arts center. The event would include a screening of the film "Merit x Zoe," followed by a panel discussion.
Mayor Sedgley asked if there was support from Councilmembers to ask staff to bring back at a future meeting a report to analyze the impacts of Mills Act agreements, as well as review the Historic Resources Inventory.
Brief discussion ensued; the request was not supported by a majority of members.
CITY COUNCIL RECESS: 5:15 P.M.
6:30 P.M. EVENING SESSION
10. CALL TO ORDER: 6:30 P.M.
10.A. Roll Call:
Councilmember Alessio, Councilmember Luros, Councilmember Narvaez, Vice Mayor Painter, and Mayor Sedgley
Present: 5 -
11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
12. AGENDA REVIEW AND SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS:
City Clerk Carranza announced the following supplemental items:
Item 14.A.:
- PowerPoint presentation from staff.
- PowerPoint presentation from applicant.
- Email from Robert Gligorea.
Item 14.B.
- PowerPoint presentation from staff.
- Email from Michael Weinberg.
(Copies of all supplemental documents are included in Attachment 2)
13. PUBLIC COMMENT:
Jim Hinton - encouraged Council to use TOT revenue to enhance Parks and Recreation facilities and services.
Susan Rushing-Hart - suggested that the City make available hard copy materials of various records for public viewing at their counters. She also shared concerns regarding water diversion near Salvador Creek, potential flooding, and loss of wildlife.
Liz Russell - member of Napa County Suicide Prevention Council, Volunteer with Moms Demand Action, and a gun violence survivor -provided comments regarding Veteran's support; invited members of the public to a movie screening and panel discussion on November 13, 2023 from 6:30 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. at the Napa Valley College Performing Arts Center.
14. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
14.A. 387-2023 Vintage Farm Subdivision
(See supplemental documents in Attachment 2)
Ryder Dilley, Associate Planner, provided the staff report.
Mayor Sedgley called for disclosures; Councilmembers provided them.
Mayor Sedgley asked the applicant if they wished to provide an opening statement. Steve Abbs of Davidon Homes, provided a brief presentation further outlining the proposed project.
Mayor Sedgley opened public testimony.
Rob Mangewala, Napa Valley Unified School District - spoke in support of the project.
Susan Rushing-Hart - voiced various concerns regarding the project to include impacts to Salvador Creek, cost of homes, extension of Sierra, and potential flooding.
Bob Gligorea - voiced various concerns regarding the project to include the removal of existing trees and traffic impacts.
A motion was made by Councilmember Alessio, seconded by Councilmember Narvaez, to close public testimony. The motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Sedgley asked the applicant if he would like to rebut any comments provided. Mr. Abbs provided further clarification regarding drainage of the site and removal of trees.
Discussion was turned over to Council.
City staff and applicants responded to individual questions and comments from members of Council.
A motion was made by Councilmember Alessio, seconded by Vice Mayor Painter, to adopt Resolution R2023-126 approving a Tentative Subdivision Map and Design Review Permit to subdivide an approximately 10.45-acre property into 53 single-family residential lots with five (5) open space parcels, a Design Review Permit for the house plans and "back-on" fence treatment, and a Use Permit to authorize the creation of five (5) flag lots at 1185 Sierra Avenue and determining that the actions authorized by this resolution were adequately analyzed by a previous CEQA action. The motion carried by the following vote:
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
Aye: Alessio, Luros, Narvaez, Painter, and Sedgley5 -
Enactment No: R2023-126
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
14.B. 293-2023 Water Rates for 2024-2028
(See supplemental documents in Attachment 2)
Mayor Sedgley opened the public hearing.
Joy Eldredge, Deputy Utilities Director, provided the report.
Mayor Sedgley called for disclosures; there were none.
Before Mayor Sedgley opened the Public Testimony portion of the Hearing, he explained that if any member of the public would like to speak during Public Testimony, they could see the City Clerk to obtain a speaker card.
He further explained that while City Council would carefully consider the public comments provided, under the requirements of the California Constitution and Proposition 218, the City may not implement the proposed updated water rates if written protests are submitted from a majority of the parcels that receive water service from the City. He instructed the public to submit written protests to the City Clerk prior to the close of public testimony. He reiterated that if the number of written protests was fifty percent or less than the number of parcels that receive water service from the City, the Council would deliberate and vote on the staff’s recommendation to approve the water rates.
Mayor Sedgley then opened the public testimony portion of the Public Hearing. The following individuals spoke:
Cindy Worthington - shared some concerns regarding the verbiage on the protest letter and questioned if there were other funding sources to look at for alternate methods of paying for the needed infrastructure improvements.
Lois Apperson - posed questions regarding notification of the rate hearing and increase. Was concerned that not enough rate payers were aware.
Suggested that comparison to other nearby counties was not fair comparison.
A motion was made by Councilmember Luros, seconded by
Councilmember Narvaez, to close the public testimony. The motion carried unanimously.
Discussion ensued, questions that were posed by members of the public were addressed.
Further individual Councilmember comments and questions ensued
ATTACHMENT 1
November 7, 2023CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA
MEETING MINUTES - Draft
City Clerk Carranza announced that at close of business that date, a total of 1,030 Protest Letters were received. During the hearing, an additional 1 Protest Letter was provided, resulting in 1,031 Protest Letters received.
Utilities Director Brun acknowledged Deputy Director Eldredge for her efforts in the rate setting process.
A motion was made by Councilmember Narvaez, seconded by Councilmember Luros, to adopt Resolution R2023-127 approving Water Rates Over a Five-Year Period (2024-2028), for all Water Rate Customers (Inside City and Outside City) Including Single-Family Residential, Multi-Family Residential, Commercial, Irrigation, Fire Service Charges, Pumped Zone Surcharges, and Treat & Wheel Charges; and Maintaining the Amount of Rateshare Program for Lower Income Customers; and Determining that the actions authorized by this resolution are exempt from CEQA. The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: Alessio, Luros, Narvaez, Painter, and Sedgley5 -
Enactment No: R2023-127
15. COMMENTS BY COUNCIL OR CITY MANAGER:
Councilmember Alessio shared that donation bins for Operation With Love From Home are out. Care packages will be assembled on Saturday, December 9, 2023 at 10:00 a.m at the Crosswalk Church Gymnasium.
Councilmember Narvaez invited members of the public to attend the Veteran's Day service at Veteran's Memorial Park at 11:00 A.M. on November 11, 2023. He also acknowledged the Marine Corps birthday, November 10, 2023.
16. ADJOURNMENT: 8:43 P.M.
The next regularly scheduled meeting for the City Council of the City of Napa is December 5, 2023.
Submitted by:
_______________________________
Tiffany Carranza, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
Office of the City Clerk
City Council of the City of Napa
Regular Meeting
November 7, 2023
FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
AFTE
RNOON SESSION:
SUBMI
TTED PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
4. PUBL
IC COMMENT:
1) Email from Maureen Trippe and Joyce Stavert received November 4, 2023.
6. ADMINI
STRATIVE REPORTS:
6.A. Outs
ide Water Service to Vintage High Farm Site
• PowerPoint Presentation from Staff.
6.B. Equ
al Employment Opportunity Annual Report, and Equity and Inclusion Plan – 2002/2023 • PowerPoint Presentation from Staff.
6.C. T
reasurer’s Quarterly Investment Report on the City’s Investment Portfolio for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2023.
• PowerPoint Presentation from Staff.
ATTACHMENT 1
From: Maureen Trippe
To: Clerk
Cc: Bernie Narvaez; Joyce Stavert; Liz Alessio; Mary Luros; Scott Sedgley; Steve Potter; Beth Painter Subject: Please include in City Council Agenda packet11/7 Date: Saturday, November 4, 2023 1:46:13 PM
[EXTERNAL]
Please include this in the agenda packet for City Council Meeting on November 7th. It is a link to the Letter to the Editor from Maureen Trippe and Joyce Stavert.
Napa Has Lost Its Way On Traffic Issues
https://napavalleyregister.com/opinion/letters/letter-napa-has-lost-its-way-on-traffic- issues/article_0887f782-7365-11ee-9aa7-df23c4c4e1ed.html We invite each Council Member to give us feedback on the concerns we have outlined.
Feedback by email would be ideal.
Thanks,
Maureen and Joyce
Joyce Stavert
Maureen Trippe
Item 4. Public Comment
ATTACHMENT 1
Nov ember 7, 2023Agenda Item 6A 1
Out
side Water Service to
Vintage High School Culinary
and Agricultural Facility
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental - Item 6.A.
From: City Staff
ATTACHMENT 1
End of Trower Avenue
Northeast of Vintage High School
Project Site
2
ATTACHMENT 1
NVUSD is replacing existing agricultural facility at Vintage Hig
h
Educational and Ag buildings, a working vineyard, and agri
cultural land
Provide access to technical education in agriculture, food, natur
al resources, and hospitality and tourism.
Part of school programming and limited to existing
stud
ents.
Project
3
ATTACHMENT 1
Requesting 3” C ommercial Water Service and 8” Fire
Water Service for the Project
Project is on portion of parcel (highlighted) that is outside Rur
al Urban Limit Line (RUL) and Sphere of Influence (SOI) Charter Section 180 allows water service outside RUL fo r public school facilities
Request and Constraints
4 Per Government Code
Section 56133, parcel
must be in City’s SOI
unless there is a threat to
public health and safety
NVUSD has submitted
request to LAFCO to
modify City SOI
ATTACHMENT 1
If Water Services are approved by Council, a
Dec
laration of Covenants and Agreement
Regarding Water Service would be executed with
NVUSD and include terms and conditions covering
the following items:
Water Services
Right-of-Wa
y
Street Improvements
Deed Restriction on Unused Land for
Affor
dable Housing
Proposed Terms
5
ATTACHMENT 1
Water service for project only
Extend City water main and install services
Pay all applicable fees
Proposed Terms – Water Services
6
ATTACHMENT 1
Dedicate property for an 84’ right-of-way for future extension of Trower Avenue
Property dedicated at no cost to City
Proposed Terms – Right-of-Way
7
ATTACHMENT 1
Construct a portion of future Trower Avenue
Enter into Maintenance Agreement where NVUSD
will maintain improvements
Construct Improvements at no cost to City
Proposed Terms – Street Improvements
8
ATTACHMENT 1
NVUSD shall execute a deed restriction on the
unuse
d portion of the Property south of the
future Trower Avenue extension (highlighted)
restricting its use for NVUSD non-residential
facilities or future affordable housing
Proposed Terms – Land for Housing
9
ATTACHMENT 1
Recommended Action
10 Adopt a resolution:
(1) supporting Napa Valley Unified School District’s application to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County to amend the City’s sphere of influence to include the northern portion of 1130 Trower Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number 038-040- 020);
(2) authorizing the Utilities Director to execute a Declaration of Covenants and Agreement Regarding Water Service with the Napa Valley Unified School District to provide water service to 1130 Trower Avenue (Assessor Parcel Number 038-040-020) for the Vintage High School Culinary and Agricultural Facility; (3) authorizing the Utilities Director to submit an application to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County for an outside service agreement; and
(4) determining that the actions authorized by this resolution were adequately analyzed by a previous CEQA action or are exempt from CEQA.
ATTACHMENT 1
Equi
ty & Inclusion Plan
2023
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental - Item 6.B.
From: City Staff
ATTACHMENT 1
Purpose
Attracting and retaining
highly skilled employees is
paramount to the City of
Napa’s success. The long-
term success of the City is
predicated on a workforce of
highly competent, motivated
people whose behavior
exemplifies the stated values
of the organization. In order
to ensure the City attracts,
hires and retains a high
quality workforce, the City
has developed equity and
inclusion objectives outlined
in this document.
ATTACHMENT 1
2022 Accomplishments
ATTACHMENT 1
2022 Accomplishments
Successful continuation of DEI Training program
~100% employee participation in Year-2
Ex
ecutive Team coaching sessions
Completed 98 competency-ba sed recruitments (69 full-time) Increased community outreach and participation in local recruitment eve
nts
Enhanced recruitment advertising - Pr int, Online, Radio, Outdoor, Transit Implemented tools to mitigate the impact of bias during the application scr
eening process
Completed first Employee Engagement Survey in 2022
Completed two Wellness Challenges in 2022 - “S pring Into Motion” and “Feel Like a Million” which received statewide recognition at CalCities Annual Conference
Held first Mid-Manager Retreat, since COVID-19
Exp
ansion of Buddy Program
ATTACHMENT 1
Current Objectives
1) 100% Citywide completion
DEI Year-3 employee training
2) Conduct 2nd Citywide
Employee Engagement Survey
and complete at least one
resulting action item
3) Offer more training
opportunities for new
Managers + Supervisors, as
well as all City employees
4) Implement innovative
recruitment/retention
initiatives
ATTACHMENT 1
Current Objectives
ATTACHMENT 1
Enhancing the
City of Napa
Employment Brand
Talented employees reflecting the community
ATTACHMENT 1
Inclusive Training
ATTACHMENT 1
Government Alliance on Race and
Equity (GARE) Training
ATTACHMENT 1
Specialized DEI Training –
Managers & Supervisors
ATTACHMENT 1
Culture Program
ATTACHMENT 1
The Why
Communicates
purpose of the
organization
Guides
organizational
culture
Informs strategy
development
Describes our
identity as an
employer
ATTACHMENT 1
Mission Statement
MISSION
STATEMENT
ATTACHMENT 1
Core Values
CORE VALUES
Integrity
Consistently demonstrating the highest level of
ethical conduct with accountability and pride.
Service
Engaging in meaningful work to care for our
community through resourceful dedication and
humble actions.
Inclusion
Creating a sense of ease and belonging through
respect, acceptance, and mindfulness of our
collective diversity.
Collaboration
Working together with a shared purpose while
respectfully considering all voices to achieve
common goals, solutions, and greater outcomes.
ATTACHMENT 1
Inclusive Recruiting
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Napa Employee Diversity
City of Napa Population * 2021
Employees
2022
Employees
Race % % %
Asian 2.80% 3.31% 4.82%
Black/ African
American 0.70% 1.42% 1.83%
Hispanic/ Latinx/
Latine/ Latin(o/a) 39.90% 23.64% 25.00%
Native American or
Alaskan Native 0.60% 1.42% 1.38%
Native Hawaiian/
Pacific Islander 0.01% 0.00% 0.00%
Other/ Multi-Ethnic 6.60% 2.84% 1.83%
White 53.0% 67.38% 63.76%
*Data Source: 2020 U.S Census Bureau
ATTACHMENT 1
Moving Forward
The employees at the City of Napa are
inspired to serve our community. As we
harness the strength of our unique set of
experiences, perspectives, skills and
ideas, we will maximize opportunities to
discover and leverage our talents to
benefit the residents we serve.
ATTACHMENT 1
The City of Napa is an Equal Opportunity Employer,
and we believe that a diverse, equitable and inclusive
workplace will maximize our talents to benefit the
residents we serve.
Ensuring that all employees and job applicants for employment are protected by federal, state and local laws designed to protect employees and job applicants from discrimination on the basis of race/ethnicity, religion, color, sex (including pregnancy, gender identity, and sexual orientation), parental status, national origin, age, disability, family medical history or genetic information, political affiliation, military service, or other non-merit based factors. These protections extend to all management practices and decisions, including recruitment and hiring practices, appraisal systems, promotions, training and career development programs.
ATTACHMENT 1
PFM
Asset Management LLC
NOT F
DIC INSURED : NO BANK GUARANTEE : MAY LOSE VALUE
pfmam.c
om
City of Napa
Inve
stment Program Update
Presentation to the City Council
415-393-7270
For I
nstitutional Investor or Investment Professional
Use Only – This material is not for inspection by,
distribution to, or quotation to the general public
November
7, 2023
Monique Spyke, Managing Director
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental - Item 6.C.
From: City Staff
ATTACHMENT 1
▸ U.S. economy has been characterized by:
▹ High inflation. Peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 and, while now at 3.7%, is still above the F
ed’s 2% target.
▹ Stronger than expected GDP. A recession in 2023 appeared likely at the start of the c
alendar year, but growth for the first three quarters has been relatively strong.
▹ Resilient labor market. Unemployment rate below 4% since February 2022. ▹ Headwinds exist. Higher energy prices, elevated geopolitical risks, high inflation, and r
educed consumer savings, could lead to a recession in the next year. ▸ Fed has hiked rates over 500 basis points (5.00%) since March 2022. ▹ Fo
r 10 consecutive meetings the Fed raised the target rate, bringing it from
0.0 0% to 0.25% to its current range of 5.25% to 5.50%. ▹ Potential for one additional rate hike in 2023.
▹ Market currently has a “higher-fo r-longer” mindset.
▸ Interest rates are at their highest levels since 2006-07 . ▹ Yield curve is inverted.
▹ Higher yields present great opportunities for City’s future earnings. ▹ Increase in rates has negatively impacted market values.
Market Themes
1
ATTACHMENT 1
Treasury Yields Higher; Curve Inverted
2Source: Bloomberg as of September 30, 2023.
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
2-Year Treasury Yield
September 30, 2006 - September 30, 2023
17-Year Average:
1.47%
5.04%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
3 M
1 Y
2 Y
3 Y
4 Y
5 Y
10 Y
30 Y
Maturity
U.S. Treasury Yield Curve
September 30, 2023 March 31, 2023
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Napa’s Investment Objectives
City’s investment policy. 3
Safety
• High quality
investments
• Diversification by
sector, issuer,
and maturity
• Management of
credit and market
risk
Liquidity
• Cash flow
coordination with
the City
• Allocation to
overnight funds
Return on
Investment
• Duration
management
• Active trading
and continual
evaluation of
relative value
among allowable
sectors
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Napa’s Portfolio
As of September 30, 2023. Total funds includes PFMAM-managed funds and the City’s balances in LAIF and the CAMP Pool. CAMP Pool is managed by PFMAM. 4
Liquid
Funds
Core
Funds
(PFMAM-
Managed)
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
Millions
City's Total Funds
4%
14%
29%
27%
26%
0%
10%
20%
30%
0-1 Year 1-2 Years 2-3 Years 3-4 Years 4-5 Years
Maturity Distribution of Core Funds
ATTACHMENT 1
City of Napa’s PFMAM-Managed Portfolio
5 Ratings by Standard & Poor’s as of September 30, 2023. Securities in the City's portfolio are in compliance with California Government Code and the City's investment policy. Portfolio information excludes overnight funds, including LAIF and the CAMP Pool. Accrued interest is excluded.
Securities not rated (NR) or rated BBB+ by S&P are rated A-, or the equivalent, or better by Moody’s and/or Fitch.
Credit Quality
Sector Allocation and Policy Compliance
▸ Portfolio is of high credit quality and well diversified.
Market Value
As of September 30, 2023
Percent
of
Portfolio
Permitted
by Policy
U.S. Treasuries $65,946,182 34% 100%
Federal Agencies $4,684,525 2% 100%
Federal Agency CMBS $28,530,939 15% 100%
Supranationals $2,766,996 1% 30%
Municipals $8,195,001 4% 100%
Asset-Backed Security $27,260,804 14% 20%
Corporate Notes $49,393,100 26% 30%
Negotiable CDs $5,099,788 3% 30%
Total $191,877,334
NR
4%
BBB+
2%
AAA
14%
AA
59%
A
21%
ATTACHMENT 1
Active Management to Maintain Duration and
Capture Higher Yields
6Based on principal proceeds of sells, maturities, and purchases. ($80) ($60) ($40) ($20) $0 $20 $40 $60
Corporate Note
Asset-Backed
Negotiable CD
Municipal
Supranational
Agency MBS
Federal Agency
U.S. Treasury
Millions
Summary of Portfolio Activity
October 2022 – September 2023 Net Activity
(millions)
-$48.1
-$4.1
+$27.0
-$0.8
-$1.3
+$5.8
+$14.9
+$10.2
Sell/Maturity Buy
ATTACHMENT 1
Yield at Market
5.15%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
Portfolio Yields
September 2013 - September 2023
Portfolio Earnings Increasing
7As of September 30, 2023. PFMAM managed portfolio only and excludes overnight funds including LAIF and the CAMP Pool. +2.21%
$0.50
$0.47
$0.52 $0.53
$0.62
$0.75
$0.81
$1.03
$1.24
$1.56
$0.0
$0.4
$0.8
$1.2
$1.6
$2.0Millions
Quarterly Interest Earnings
Yield at Cost
3.23%
ATTACHMENT 1
Long-Term Portfolio Performance Remains
Positive
Interest earned calculated as the ending accrued interest less beginning accrued interest, plus net interest activity.
Returns are presented on an annualized basis.
The portfolio’s benchmark is the ICE BofAML 1-5 Year U.S Treasury/Agency Index. Source: Bloomberg. ▸ While sharply rising interest rates have had a negative impact on the portfolio’s market values, the por
tfolio continues to perform well versus its benchmark, the 1-5 Year U.S. Treasury/Agency index.
▸ Portfolio outperformance can be attributed to the portfolio’s diversification and duration management
.
8 Market Value Basis Earnings Past 1 Year Past 5 Years Past 10 Years Interest Earned $4,629,231 $14,366,621 $21,277,167
Change in Market Value $659,479 ($9,223,641) ($11,819,544) Total Dollar Return $5,288,710 $5,142,980 $9,457,623
Total Return
City of Napa 2.70% 1.29% 1.17%
Benchmark 2.14% 0.93% 0.83%
Difference +0.56% +0.36% +0.34%
As of September 30, 2023
ATTACHMENT 1
Outlook
9 ECONOMY AND INTEREST RATES
▸ Strong labor market and wage growth
▸ Inflation stuck at 3% - 3.5% significantly over the Fed’s 2% target
▸ U.S. consumer favors services yet spending less as we approach the holidays
▸ Federal Reserve continues to fight inflation, anticipate one more rate hike in 2023
▸ Increased risk of recession due to decreased consumer spending, higher energy prices, and manufacturing
slump
PORTFOLIO STRATEGY
▸ Continued focus on safety and liquidity
▸ Maintain broad diversification by sector, industry, and issuer
▸ Evaluate all opportunities to safely add value to the portfolios
ATTACHMENT 1
Disclaimer
Investment advisory services are provided by PFM Asset Management LLC (“PFMAM”), an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp Asset Management, Inc. (“USBAM”). USBAM is a subsidiary of U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S.
Bank”). U.S. Bank is a separate entity and subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of PFMAM.The information contained is not an offer to purchase or sell any securities. Additional applicable regulatory information is available upon request.
For more information regarding PFMAM’s services please visitwww.pfmam.com.
Disclaimer
10
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 2
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
Office of the City Clerk
City Council of the City of Napa
Regular Meeting
November 7, 2023
FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
EVENI
NG SESSION:
SUBMI
TTED PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
14. PUBLI
C HEARINGS:
14.A. Vin
tage Farm Subdivision
• PowerPoint Presentation from Staff.
• PowerPoint Presentation from Applicant.
1) Email from Robert Gligorea received on November 7, 2023
14.B.
Water Rates for 2024-2028
• PowerPoint Presentation from Staff.
1) Email from Michael Weinberg received on September 27, 2023 SUBMI
TTED DURING OR AFTER THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
13. PUBLIC COMMENT:
1) Written communication with photos from Susan Rushing Hart received November 7, 2023.
ATTACHMENT 1
<5oFPtl^V) 13
f^\ .^u9A^ ^M l^-^ ^
City Council MembersNov,2023
I have some general concerns regarding the availability of information to the public and specific concerns with my area.
At one time, it was possible to look at and read the General Plan at our local library, the Planning Department or at City Hall. You could also check out materials on an upcoming development or the General Plan from the Planning Department to take home overnight. Hard copy materials are no longer made available to the general public unless they pay for them. Can the City reinstate this practice? My major (and personal), concern is of the water diverted to Salvador Creek. Once upon a time, there were three creeks in the area that joined the Napa River at Trancas Crossing. Pre-1985, Garfield Park property frequently flooded and there was a seasonal pond on the north side of Garfield Ln.
The neighborhood is aware that there are flood events that occur at the Garfield bridge of Salvador Creek. Soon after the Silverado Creek subdivision was completed the area flooded. The city is aware there are problems but it does not address the increase of depth, frequency, velocity, nor the severe erosion caused by the flood events.
Shouldn't the city address these issues?
When the EIR and other studies were done for the Big Ranch Road Specific Plan (BRRSP), I was concerned about the species of interest. Amongst the life forms I had seen, there had been small blue butterflies, bats, salmon and western pond turtles that were of special concern. I was told that the salmon were only lost, that the creek was
ATTACHMENT 1
man-made so there would be no native salmon. I researched and found this to be inaccurate. The creek was man manipulated.
When the 2020 General Plan came into being, rather than making a new study or EIR for that property north and west of the specific plan area the city only extended the of BRRSP's coverage.
Recently, I became aware that the County Board of Supervisors had not disputed information passed on to FEMA. It was claimed that the Salvador Creek drained an area of 2.2 miles. At the time, I told the Board that this was not true.
Only recently, I had reason to contact FEMA. I believe they continue to use information that is not true. I was told that the information they receive comes from the City of Napa's Planning department. Can the Planning department verify what information they have sent on to FEMA?
The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) which is managed by FEMA posted on their website that "...just one inch of floodwater can cause up to $25,000 in damage..."
I understand that the City has 2 more projects that will ultimately drain to Salvador Creek within the Planning Dept. How can any hydrology study or plan be accurate if the information the study is based on is wrong?
I am concerned with the connection of Sierra Ave to Villa Lane. The City held meetings open to the general public and certain slowing down measures were agreed upon.
ATTACHMENT 1
Those measures are no longer a part of the new plan. The general public has not been made aware of this change. The walkability of the neighborhood will be lost. Will the city lower the speed limit thru the park property (as it is lowered thru park property on Garfield Ln)? The city had also agreed to make changes to the crossing at El Capitan Way. Is this still a part of the plan?
Sierra Ave is not wide enough to be considered a collector Street. From Lassen St east, to Jefferson, there are no sidewalks and people walk in the street. I believe it is most threatening after dark. I am concerned that it will only become more dangerous for those people who live on Sierra Ave, walk to the 7-11, and those children who attend the grammar school or families that attend church on Lassen St. at the very least, can the speed limit be lowered in this area?
Villa Lane is also dangerous. First of all, the directional signs painted on the streets have worn away and have been illegible for several years (I would take a can of white spray paint and fix it but I don't want to be arrested for the defacing of public property); can the City remedy this?
Trancas St to Blackberry can be treacherous. There are several elder seniors living who live and walk (using walkers) on Villa Ln. From 9 am to 5 pm (between Trancas St. and Firefly) cars are constantly entering and exiting doctor's or medical offices. They often fail to "look both ways" and just pull into the Lane. For safety's sake can the speed limit be lowered? Students walk to school walk to and from school along Villa Ln. Cars often speed to the north end of the lane.
If a death occurs on Villa Ln or Sierra Ave, will this connection be discontinued?
ATTACHMENT 1
0-
^
fi
yI
> \f
a.
^^A
^i
*••
^4
ft) s
(
«
t t I
\
t (f
f
I »
I
* (
^ li
I-
\
i
t
l)»w
!-•
'\
1 i »
<
f-
f
k•/
4 f '•• :9-
^^
^
^ ^..(I
N»'s
^
fc-
t <IPE;.»"- i
g
•il-.S'f-
K1
i t
H
<"i<
I r"1,* ;d"
>^':^&:|teE-*^..^'i£^%<?
I s I
ATTACHMENT 1
fit
v .^»%"^^
""'
1ffv~
^;; •
S^N P^BLO BA, / - .— " ^ -^ . \.;1^1^
^i ^^^uj^f-es, .0. \^&.."'' . ^. $:?/ 4:;yL" ,;"^/
^o^K. . &/^^^'6/.,^^ '^^K^£^
\N ^
^M
' •
LfftOIN(f
Et- C,£SB o-jl^^^T&l^r
;Si^^p^^
ATTACHMENT 1
^w••»
.<s^* «
s
?<»'0
s ^ B
» 1 »»
^
^
I".
»
»'
:^^
t«
w
•
?•
••
», »
v?4 »
»*•^^ ^t.1
»,
•*
*'.-•
^
0 <
"•
•
if• ^*J-t .<(•»'^, ^
^
s ^.<•
%»«.
.»
It
^
(t
A» »
\ <•<*v •
•^ s
f%«» »<(
^
t^••
M.»t
^»<t"
^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^^\
ȣs's
^.:
»
t^
9 ^
t»»« ?;
•
^. ^1
»•^
A
»
^^ <. •
»
•t
<ll• » »
*
<(•
^%
1 ^1 ^
»* t
<^1 "k
s •t
» ?
<,*
s?
^.;.y t
J9
^
•^ *
t y"^t»»
•s.^s
t.^
«»
•
^
» <(
»
•^
v^»." %»
^
1^ ».»*»<
•I^ ^t c%
t
• w.t6»% •i "
1»<
»^ v y.;
.< ^.
<
^
^ •i
^
^
»
t\
\•• *
T.\*B
». w
t
s»^
,;
t
^
'-».
»>4
^
y^
ftv ^*
^-» s'«»./- l.,'A*
N
.-» ^ M
^••
s;7'*•
y
•
•t^ /-•-.^^ ?»^'
r ^9^ ^
s'^<»
^
^-?]
^•^ ^m
f- s.
»» ^
,+•^>
% •^fK
^^<
p;«,•
» ";
t
/ ^
^
^•A h ^
g
?'* ^•s^
m amIfe<J
^
>;
r»i- ^'s
^
^t
4.'-
^»
I-%'^.':-^
tt <
t1;\
•^\
.*Ifc
^\
fc
^
i»*
^ «t
V
^"
-M^
»
'^m.<,i
¥^A
6«8,^^v
yv,•;•*
b;,:^•.i»r.t .1
•<
ATTACHMENT 1
V-'.
V
s' ^ »--
•^^
*<
\ -:-'•
'/-
&
^.•fl -^ft -^A'-^^
•\&
Y% ^
^ ^/.^
^
^ ^
c'»'
i .^ ^
'I ^'.•;' ^
^
^
100
K
^
..°
%
^
M
:'..
^<•{•
^ <•^..
^.
.y-
^•*
^
\:y.
.>•
;1M
••'0
x ^ ..* •/t:'.&•
^.
^:' ;
»
-•--
^
»
(..
•o
.< •/^
^ Oak Knoll
—%-
/
.,'.f
%^
'Windmill
^
^3'-^>&
^•"',D
^s '-'-'':
m
-.^••
^lie
s'/.;
.^
•^'•:• -.20^
'/.t'. A..
'10 -,
^
-<
-^
••»
s. ^ %
*'
^
r.. ''^
tf
\^
^
v
^
'^. ^ =<•
^ ^ ;i
^m
cf<f
toe ••
li ^x *.
1 r\
T.!
'•^. ^^ ^
^
.\^ .\.@ M^
v^'-^€
Trailer?;^:.
^.
101
•\'
0 ^
5-
•^^J '•s.^•^.°li
A^
<"^N^
^"
:v-
<\.
\"<•*•«
.-•• •:^
^
d
Y^^
^
"'..
x^
t<
.<•"" ^
°.'
m^r^ 50.
^•-
&
",
^~
:%A^
T%ller1i-s
^
^.
z.60 ^i^
-^'
^ i'-S ^ ^^
,??
\i^:m •s -y
u
<»
^ *« •^
.<
'^':<«1
..'
;"•
.'s'^ ^y<A.^. roC.^';
^ "«.'.\ Kl Cn
^
Sch
^ s^.
»;
ym ^- ^ ,.•
rF i^c<o
•^
••»• ^ i
^ J ^ „.''
f.
•^^
^
•'c
.^.
/
^^:'~^^~ ^•s
I-BM7 ^
T<»
^
r
^
^
,^» ^f^tS
3^:-^
•^
y ^'^
,^
••0"). .-^ ,'
;< .'-'
t'
'•s
--^' i^
\
^^^" •^^5^r,
^y,
•^s%
>?
^ r^
•\
••
^\*^ ^\
*;••. Sl
^:f^
^:^
^
^ ^ ;<>•=•3=V-:
'I S£.."••>!
^^^Ss
^>:
.0
w
c.^
.,°.*g;^^fjuw^
^ ?<':
^
^^
IJ^IQ-?
v
^.
^
%?
.•.•/<ol
^-> v'^.
..'r.eii
<*BM4 ^
^-
\;
c
^"A 3c .IrKi;cl A
^'^
I
B°°.' ??• %
-f
;•
^
^s^.
w.."
^ \-
'.»
tf°
^
Siv
tf •)\i.
•••
^
F. ^^s&
•^
-.£^
•'1^%.»°
;••«; 1
^/
;».*
p.
•°•°5<s
^'"^^ ^
6^
a
15 »• ^
l>L'tQ"n,r^acr .^, ^ s.
-^-
lj,fc£cli
1 ^-
a I-
1\;
w^.
?i *?
te?!3
m^u
^
•'.e^
^^
t-^3=
^
0 ^
s\':
m0^Ar
•*h-
•t
'.^;'~
•• §^ if •r"•»
s'•^
^^^(^ :7^^)y^<^^^^- f ^K^^^
ATTACHMENT 1
^-: •^
.^-•^-<n
!*ff^
\i ^
^ V /g-
^
^ f
's
^ s;
^
••»"•<»
.-3
•^
I'--:
X•^\•
fj
•K•^
\ '«
r^ss& fl,
1 <<
'*}
V.v«<
«r
»^
v>^
-/ 'y
%•
^
\ */^y
*as•;'"• s*.i •If-»» ^ ^'-;
»x^ •*.(<,? ^\
^^^
6 ^
^.
1-".
.»
t^^ \^ ';.
-'
,»
^\w ^
\
^
r:
^ •t
^
-^i
•*•.-M
^s
\
i f
/«^ ^;*i
^.'
^
4 ./
«%. 4
^
•o,
•••>
'•-;.
»
^
'< «i
v \
*-*'
-M v
•^f'
•»! <.< .r
I ss^,;'^- ,'.
4( '^
I*
B
4/ ^i t» <sl
<•
^ f 41
%..
»*-
s
*.' Sti»^
y ^
»:
^
R\ ®
St
f
"$
:..'
».
^"^ ^
-^
:.f .c-5 -*':
^
y^^ *^ »^\> •s\
*'^
^.
^-t
^\^?f
';>
,f
$ ^^-^%
\
f^, •'< -^ ^^'.I ^^'-^
(*
,^ :•„
\
^
^
%
^
^.
^\
\•'*"
^-
t
•E^*?••
#
\
<r^^ ^^
^^^f ''^^
vy^^
w
=..*
^\
r<i' ^•••t
\<•J^c-'"<\
«^ •-•^
^s •^ *%
^
4. •*•
^-; •"
(28-'s
^slti
^> '<»^^t
•^y-^^ M^
^
\f
>ft
^ ^
1 ^ £. ^
-->
V-;
^
A^;•; \.
*-.>.-s:
i
^
5^r
m,^ !;
<-»
£^
•s-:'•f-..
•-/ Th*
^ s;>
^•A ^
'•V-nt ••»>
^1
•V
0 ^^^-^
^
1k%"
1\^ •«
m
*<•
u
^
.»/
\ ^1K
^
^
t;
^
? ?•;^
>
^
cm^
^"<
'^
^ ^?» f
^ ^ »'^
-•
>••»^ ?-£
a
4 ^^w.
^•>••:••^>^4 3k;
% :.<^^>i
»\
•iC
9 ^
*<<p<•^ t
^-^ft^ JiW
'^.
< ^ 71
\ fl'^
t?^^r,<
;
\.- \ ^ 4 •^';'xi\.
^
t< ^3 ^ ^\ ^ f--'
!.,
« ^
-•<.
«[1
^
^ t
£'- •<
/&.r?
>
»i
'-"•..
f.'.
s
fa? ^
lr
•^ &
;r:^ —^
r^s ^1?<
5. ft*
^f^
v
/•^^
-•<.
'» ^•"«.
f-* ^
^1 t^
.V
•»
?
--,«.
i 7y.
•»3
^
*-
^'.11-?
^ •':?V
t
^^ /^ ^^.
'^^
^ ^
s^fp-y *.
'•,
^
•^
k-
*> '(• ^s^-?.- ^
•^
^>«a
•'•«^ ^
an*Ja& \-^
ATTACHMENT 1
a®
3 ^*
w-
»r &
^
Wl
« ^^a
k,i< •%
<(.^
*
y € I
«,
^
I
m
^
w.
a
•V *
^
I»
i.l:l..::ait
1 s^ 3
i-
a»
I
m
Ih "••s a
»s
t
ISlm
B
li^ a-~^^
m
!•
i»^t
a»^^
Ica a
^)3»
i y ^a St ^K iS9iWH •«»
^
i^cI'1 3 «T»»B -I/ii1 h,B<s~» IB
^bI I I yI
» ^
»>..
a:, ti
a
f. s»
t
If
t
)
at I »s
a,
KIll.1
t»a^
I
sm ,1
I< %» »fi
^ sf»? w
:&
g
««B'(S
ft ^»sg••
.1
^v ^»-.. t
I •-t<It .jl
1 -ig
a
I^ill
ls"i I"<w
W*5-:.'
m
»<^ t«
"a» I-r"•f
t s(S*
%.^*y i
a.K »
sm »•«m
'e-~''^^,,^^_::tB.,I.3iwt?
.Ihs,^ . • a8' '^
^m EW '%,..*..
!i »l«
^. I» ^
y !"
i g
^
s
ak
tfI
/
«
ALi:
ATTACHMENT 1
. ^'.-^ ..^
«"
's
^rm
„-«- • ;,..1>.h .,;,.,„:.."'t ?i
iK 's
s' •
»'*t'.: ..i'?c*
^<k
s
f
t ? ,
tf
A) \ I<^
^ffij
1 .t
--^
<^
') (
ft
fe
^ !it ^ Ik-W
.*
s
^
&
s
;?
m^^
ATTACHMENT 1
0 5
^ ^LL^
/
<J
A<sr<»
:•"'•-.MS,,.< ••
•^
0 0 ^0 10
\l ^^
T/fueoor M
BW
^
'A-/tf It.
i^ v
&^
A
y^' ^
</FW
.-t-
\ 'OWf OflLI
yy<5"' 0HOT\S)»^7^S,
'A<d
^
s";•/-<•'/? 0
^00(^
ON~h
'^
Tuloca
?1
fj^sw/rc ? £
?• sS-
:-^fg.
sg r
• •u.
•5"<A7- -» ^S-y/t/
A
•^>
SUCH. ^c^^
^
?1[Z ^
5<» •£V,
0 ^ ^w^ W?G/
r :<?irf.
/
^
l/fvu
•f: ^"^
:"^?1
i^a..;^^
^3^ ^ ^,^T-
^'-?
^
X'^ it;
:. /),7/>S'c> 'S£^/7S/^-a •^:> ^
w
.<
°.
^
r^ ^
A
^^
1^^
y_
^ ^ I
s, /^
MA
.^J^
i
/?
.^?
">
^-
^
s
fe5
^ £^
;;
^
'AL
0 &.<
^.
'<
^
^
(/ SAJVPY{BL0B
•s^^&'^ h^-'M&VftLLEJO JuNCTf /^AJ
5^; 4:7^-& /^/Li ^^'^^.^
Lf/VDlNCf
£L G{ eg BO
0 0°c"^ 4W i.1
^^^^^ u"r
^.¥]
ATTACHMENT 1
X-:. J-1-'1^
^ ^^
") ,^^Mile
•^ ^i-
^
/ 1
^/ ^ ,"<
5\-^^ ^0 L•a /< vs^ ^
^ ^(:<
^^^ ••
."• ••'0»'.^-I
\< ii«=;
^? .^ .noilI:T •mLS3
•y;s:
^i^&-'^^ Windmill
,--;
,^ .^/-^
-;.p ?c
^
•\^t^
•I 1
^s^ ^^- .:£••^i•';^ °%11^"•'•'•: ^'^ ^=-
^^ l'<
w ^ ^
-^^
^^i ^% zv^fc^;•^
°.
»-•
r^^ :K^
^- •.•••»^I^^^
>:::v•^ •s'.
•T^m^•. ^
f:
<^?• ^.f•-I z
.-;'£;'
^:': :\c^ ^^ itraOO^.^ t<-h
i
\
^t^ ^ J••»*
^m. iS
V'
-s^TS^ ^.
^^ ''.. ^
^N ^ BM
^ ^ •^A- :-'.;..,^ s>.
*' ,$'^^ ?•^ ,'
r^ ••> —A5 ^^ (I -\^ r:^ ^s?'^•-An:ooii )i^^-';.°^ ?^^:-^^ 0 ^•^~\ ^0 m.^Ketlr;
A"-•BM :"1C
^ IF£^? S^"».«i^ ^
!?<;.y
s3 h\. »51,F.' ;•;•••:
^-";iy wK.
^•""^^ ^^^4f i
y
^ ^['-'un
Sd ;sc;-^--
—-•
^T' -y-^^ w-i3te ^ ^il -^ (6•• % ?.5^.;-•:
^t .^
•I-i .V-3€, t^wK4r" '•s':
ATTACHMENT 1
's*' "•.'*.
t^
*?t s« w..m '"*.%
f \'
?"t^ &i
m J»t
•?-t^
*-
a
-.1*
^
»^^
M
*
-s^ ;.<. •»'i
s.;-'
:.
^^'fit
%-1.<
;i
\
s:
t
.i>
f \
f3 I-^
>aE»
BS-t'
t.t
'I
^
^
"f
«
t s
^••V
m^
1 V-
f,
^&^ ^ .«vk^ •w
k-.
S^i^".^
^
;-.'
/ %'•si•f
s•sf,
&.
?!••
^.'•i-
m '*'
»^
E~
•I•\
s^
"•?
m m
K?
wr/-»•» »>-.i m
•^
^m ^
».-
f^^ ^ t
^
nsf
^-».
•^^;
.;;
,.<
^
•*^
^1••?»
.'••
"V
%•;:':.;
:1
-3
^ ^
»^^
•V%
y.:~.
k
K^
^?\
I
'^
,%
y
.\
%
I•«,
^
t
*
'**
\
^.»
»
?-•
\,
s<
•
M
SL%
^
<v
s
^
%*-.
•^
^
m »»
•^
\^.
'•••«
^
^
»
S1?
»fc •t
i
^
•n
^
a
•j;>-
•»<
^
^.*
t»<
8*1
•^-
^<•<b.*
ftw»a*
t *»»
*
^
»
»
*^^ )•
^^ •X
^% »»<
\
s' <f-fiy:
>^
<M ^
^v<
••
'.%
^
K
^
»
«'s<
s^
y
^\^^«
»%s
# t'^
r
*
t^
*0
li
II1^
^
«^I
»
»\
<1
»
*.
«f -*
»
<t A<»
^
^
•*^
«•
^
^•F
<r»,
\€
»
^
*•
»<»
^
^
»
t
"t
»
^
As •k
> «
v
»
»
^
s
s
Is^
«ll
»f\
^
*
m
»
t.
^:»<
At
»
B»
%.»
f k
^ fc
<f
^
•fe
^ t.
»
:v
»
<
&'s
*
\
^.»t
»^ »^
»^'» \
t
s?&9
*»
%v »»*^ >
<»,^
^^*.
^
•
r^
•
»
<f*••% "»
»^
^
^
•
*
^,»•
s;*
^ hI h^.^ »t*
<*
* »<
\
*»
*.
^
^ <*
•<4
t
'it*
^ <
^«
•
^'1^<
s'. ^*-•<:
4'
mfc
ms. «:?»
A ftv^s.^ <c^
»*
*B •yt^ •»a.
f
^f»,1I
»'
s ^
* -A
%*k.,* *'•»•
1 It> r*»
%» ^<^ •*<L
«
^
»• '•
•
•
»
*
•-»
A\
•»
\ .«
^^ \^
».^ t*^<»< 4
•
±
-t.*
^^
*~\^
\
ATTACHMENT 1
s.\
\^
&^
^
,•-;
\
,/
%^ »-. /^ -3:?-^ •^t\2 •%; ^•V >f. <.^ .:
•f ;^-"» »•^t.
\ :*';•s.^ *-* ^t»*; ,t
^ ^ \.T,
•\-<VL•»•<- \
•<
^
fl»•/^ ^
<i~ ?..•- ^* s
^ \^(
^s;:<,?. ^"
^
^ \^
\ ^
7 ^•\ -k'•^ ^
-t «»!-; ^
t^/,« •t
/ "?y»•:
* ^J ^^.
•^
;-.: 4 ^
0 < '^ V(- A- v
*
^ <- t \
>:«E
;
»\-..'
a?
*fri «<:^ r''•.t ^ *^ f^'f w..
V
a
^^$?'-? 'f11 ^ *. T'?«, ^^ zTIs^S'X;-. v;t ;-iS;•<'
^i^ ;/J•s•4 4*"^ ^1^.•5;: \
2\^ .s f -^•>^
•^
^•u7f
^ ••"•'•^<•X0- »
^
^>-^»S»i •^ •<
^ \-i•-A. •I.i. f
fS
>>:;^
m^ ;•.",•>•\ a•i
f^
<<•^•'••
I
:'*» V-
^./ '; M^m^ .M ^m
'. \^^
3. ^€.%
^A•i. % ^
•> '••s.
•:* n: -
<.
^
\^\ y •^rf\ •'•
^>. -.s >,-+'i~ ^? f-'•'-^- >-..sr ?-.<.
^
a';>\ ^-/<
.^Vr :
<•ft
.<-» >\.
^
-i<\ •*„
". »<yt
v*
<;:?^ ^••f-.m »-":^ '•»•^ •'•^ K
^
t' £^
^
<*r <t't 5l': •\
^ ''«•^^ i \(<• & -•*• UL,
>5.'. kV'
^
te >> .-^'&•:;: i?s .^'^
:.;.f
?
».
i??
^, ^%M /
<r;'.r
^ <t 3
^•>:•:;- %^
'•4*
m
iW-. g<z^ ^
m. ^ c-\^ ..-«: •ys•-a /»'
c» .';
\- '4' &.••:;sI* I»'. %•^,*. ^ •»:-x ^•it »: I f
^^ \.-'•^ Ar^^ V. •t
^^ r:
V,% —
/;^fet n
^
;•<:
»•
K \ry.-. <^ «. ^^m ^t
!^."? ^
,-t
'«•J> ;•
^-^ ^-*-•^
*-.~•^
." \
•/. ^ .*<NC3
^
I V,7
ATTACHMENT 1
Flow (cfs)
§
c
s
8 u
0 MJ
g M
U1
pp.
8 ^
8 8
g
8 u
?FS>
§ 8
0 U1
ATTACHMENT 1
siisa
mv
~tM"
: *',.:''
» /:;
^
ATTACHMENT 1
VW^... .^'f" ^v. v^.K •l^^' • ^' ^^1.-^^m.
t
'^.-
I
m
k?^' '•"'• v ' ^' .^!
.^ . 's:"-y
A
\ff
^,*
^
rsyiNII3
•V
,ySS^-'-wf^f^-»
fcs-
">WN*ysilfetA^% »w
<ar> .^w»
»-r
ast*;
e
a -I*
T
.^»<.2S.;
s-1
«*»•
-T?TAJ -^<D]^
ATTACHMENT 1
PL21-0063 Vintage Farm Subdivision
November 7, 2023
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental Item 14.A.
From: City Staff
ATTACHMENT 1
Vintage Farm Subdivision
VINTAGE FARM SUBDIVISION – 1185 SIERRA AVENUE
(PL21-0063) An application for a Tentative Subdivision Map and Design Review Permit to subdivide an approximately 10.45-acre property into 53 single-family residential lots with five (5) open space parcels, and a Design Review Permit for the house plans and “back-on” fence treatment, and a Use Permit to authorize the creation of five (5) flag lots at 1185 Sierra Avenue. The property is located within the Low Density Residential General Plan Designation, and the RI 4, Single-Family Infill, and FP, Floodplain Management Overlay Zoning Districts.
APNs: 038-250-035 and -037
Applicant: Davidon Homes
ATTACHMENT 1
Project Location
1185 Sierra Avenue
ATTACHMENT 1
Site Context
• Vintage Farm
• Approximately 10.45-acres
• Adjacent Right-of-Way
– Sierra Avenue
– Villa Lane
– Austin Miller Memorial
Bike Path
• Adjacent Uses
– North: Garfield Park
– East: Single-Family
Residential
– South: Single-Family
Residential
– West: Single-Family
Residential
ATTACHMENT 1
Project Description
• Tentative Subdivision Map
– 53 single-family residential lots
– Five (5) open space parcels
• Design Review
– Tentative Subdivision Map
– Four (4) house plan options
• Three (3) style options (A, B, C) for each house plan – “Back-on” fence treatment
• Use Permit
– Five (5) flag lots
ATTACHMENT 1
Property Designation
• General Plan
– Low Density Residential (3-8 du/acre)
– Approximately 10.45-acre property
– Min. 32 – Max. 83 units
• Zoning
– RI 4 – Single-Family Infill (Min. 4,000 sq. ft. lot size) – FP – Floodplain Management Overlay
ATTACHMENT 1
Tentative Map
Standard residential lots ranging
from 4,823 to 8,246 square feet
ATTACHMENT 1
Proposed House Plans
• Four (4) house plan options
– Plans 1 - 4
• One (1) single-story and three (3) two-story plan options • Three (3) style options (A, B, C) for each house plan – Plan 4 includes an alternate floor plan option that would include an attached ADU
• House plans
– Approximately 1,870 to 2,862 sq. ft. in size
– Heights range from 18’-9” to 28’-9”
ATTACHMENT 1
Single Story - Plan 1 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Single Story - Plan 1 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Single Story - Plan 1 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 2 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 2 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 2 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 3 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 3 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 3 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 4 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 4 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 4 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story – Plan 4 (ADU Alt)
STANDARD ADU ALT
• Attached ADU option in-lieu of first-floor bedroom
• Approximately 406 sq. ft.
• Subdivision may include up to 13 ADUs as part of Plan 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Access to Project Site
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Local Street
ATTACHMENT 1
Circulation
ATTACHMENT 1
Landscape Plan
ATTACHMENT 1
Flag Lots
ATTACHMENT 1
Planning Commission Meeting
October 05, 2023
• Commission discussion focused on –
• Generally pleased with the design of the subdivision, its compatibility with the existing neighborhood, and the Applicant’s willingness to expand upon prior architectural styles;
• During public comment, four (4) members of the public spoke voicing concerns and two (2) members representing Napa Valley Unified School District (NVUSD) in support of the Project;
• General concerns with the renderings showing window mullions that are “fake” and the roofing type choice. Project will contribute to climate change. City needs to consider objective standards for building to fight climate change and Applicant shall consider options for prospective home buyers.
• Planning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 3 – 1, with one abstention.
ATTACHMENT 1
Design Review Permit - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.62.050
Pursuant to NMC Section 17.62.050, a design review permit is required for subdivisions of five or more lots and for fence “side on” or “back on” treatments.
Home designs shall be submitted with the application for design review of the subdivision.
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.62.080 – Required
Findings
A. The project design is in accord with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan design policies.
B. The project design is consistent with applicable design review guidelines adopted by the City Council.
C. The design review permit is in accord with provisions of this title and will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the development site, or to the public health, safety or general welfare.
ATTACHMENT 1
Tentative Subdivision Map - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 16.20.070 – Required
Findings
A. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
B. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, as described in the State Subdivision Map Act and any guidelines promulgated by the Council.
ATTACHMENT 1
Use Permit - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.08.020
Pursuant to NMC Section 17.08.020, the RI 4 Zone District allows a subdivision with 1 or more flag lots subject to the approval of a use permit.
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.60.070 – Required
Findings
A. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, applicable specific plans, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purposes of the district and overlay district in which the site is located.
B. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, or to the general welfare of the city.
C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance.
ATTACHMENT 1
Tree Removal - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 12.45.090
The City Council’s approval of this project is subject to the required finding in NMC Section 12.45.090(B)(2)(d) relating to the removal of protected native trees. The Applicant requests the removal of two (2) Coast Live Oak trees and four (4) Valley Oak trees that are each classified as a Protected Native Tree pursuant to NMC Chapter 12.45.
Napa Municipal Code Section 12.45.090(B)(2)(d) –
Required Finding
A. The project has minimized tree loss to the extent possible when balanced with General Plan land uses and policies and applicable design guidelines.
ATTACHMENT 1
Recommendation
Adopt a resolution approving a Tentative Subdivision
Map and Design Review Permit to subdivide an
approximately 10.45-acre property into 53 single-family residential lots with five (5) open space parcels, a Design Review Permit for the house plans and “back-on” fence
treatment, and a Use Permit to authorize the creation of five (5) flag lots at 1185 Sierra Avenue, and determining that the actions authorized by the resolution were
adequately analyzed by a previous California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) action.
ATTACHMENT 1
End of Presentation
ATTACHMENT 1
Transportation Enhancements
There are multiple transportation enhancements/traffic calming features along the Sierra Avenue Extension and Villa Lane.
ATTACHMENT 1
Transportation Enhancements
There are multiple transportation enhancements/traffic calming features along the Sierra Avenue Extension and Villa Lane.
ATTACHMENT 1
Transportation Enhancements
There are multiple transportation enhancements/traffic calming features along the Sierra Avenue Extension and Villa Lane.
ATTACHMENT 1
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental - Item 14.A.
From: Applicant
ATTACHMENT 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
ATTACHMENT 1
PROPOSED PROJECT
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
PERIMETER
ENHANCEMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1
EXISTING VILLA LANE
ATTACHMENT 1
SIERRA AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS
Austin Miller
Memorial Path
ATTACHMENT 1
SIERRA AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS
Austin Miller
Memorial Path
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 1
1,870 sf
17 units (32%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 2
2,488 sf
12 units (23%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 3
2,565 sf
11 units (20%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 4
2,854 sf
ADU Option
13 units (25%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Street Scene Lots 3-8
Street Scene Lots 48-53
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
Standard Jr. Primary Bedroom Optional ADU
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 1
1,870 sf
17 units (32%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 2
2,488 sf
12 units (23%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 3
2,565 sf
11 units (20%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 4
2,854 sf
ADU Option
13 units (25%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Vintage Farm Subdivision
Comments and Concerns Regarding Proposed Subdivision
Robert Gligorea, Blackberry Drive resident for 24 years
• Tenta�ve Subdivision Map and Design Review states that house plans descrip�on includes “back-on” and “side-on” fence treatment but doesn’t explain what this is. Numerous Google searches fail to find a descrip�on of what “back-on” or “side-on” fence treatment is. Need writen explana�on from builder to be able to provide appropriate comment.
• Will streets in new subdivision be wide enough to allow dual direc�on vehicle travel when vehicles are parked on both sides of the street? Streets in Silverado Creek Subdivision are not wide enough to permit this.
• Landscaping plan indicates that a majority of the exis�ng Sycamore trees on Villa Lane would be maintained except for 15 trees along the Southeast side of the project site that will be removed to allow an addi�onal street connec�on from Villa Lane to the internal streets as well as an addi�onal bioreten�on facility. There are currently only 29 Sycamore trees on the West side of Villa Lane. So it appears that a majority of the exis�ng trees will be cut down rather than be maintained. What is the requirement for these trees to be removed?
• The Landscaping plan indicates that the Sycamore trees to be cut down are along the Southeast side of the project site. However, a review of the detailed Landscaping Plan indicates that most of the trees to be cut down are along the Northeast side of the project? Which is it? • Dozens of people walk their dogs on the shaded sidewalk on the West side of Villa Lane each day. If the Sycamore trees are cut down, will addi�onal trees be planted to provide shade on this sidewalk or will there be no shade in the future on this sidewalk? Many of the people who walk their dogs on this sidewalk do not live within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision and will not have received any prior no�fica�on about this proposed subdivision nor the elimina�on of the shade on the sidewalk where they are currently walking their dogs.
• The Project Descrip�on Document indicates that the subdivision is designed with a rear yard landscape treatment along the East side of lots 24 to 32 adjacent to Villa Lane. The landscaping treatment will consist of a mixture of trees and small shrubs with a 6 foot tall fence. If the landscaping plan is to include trees, why are 15 mature Sycamore trees being removed? • The builder has not provided a plan to minimize dust during the building of the subdivision. Although comments were made during the planning commission that dust would only be a problem during the ini�al stages of construc�on when earth was being moved, that is not true for the soil types that are present on the construc�on site. During construc�on of the Silverado Creek Subdivision, there were 2 or more inches of loose soil on top of each lot and the evening winds caused a great deal of dust in our neighborhood.
• Will the houses in the new subdivision be added to the exis�ng Silverado Creek Maintenance District? This maintenance district is currently paying for the maintenance of the exis�ng landscaping along Villa Lane including tree trimming, landscape watering, and leaf pickup. Will the new homeowners’ associa�on for the proposed subdivision be taking over this responsibility or will the new homes become part of the Silverado Creek Maintenance District? • Sprinkler systems and drip-irriga�on systems on exis�ng homes in the Silverado Creek Subdivision were designed based on exis�ng water pressure in the supply lines to the subdivision. Are plans in place to
ATTACHMENT 1
ensure that adding a large number of new homes to the neighborhood won’t adversely affect water pressure in the Silverado Creek Subdivision?
• At Planning Commission Mee�ng, the builder indicated that asphalt shingle and concrete �le roofs each have an es�mated life of approximately 20 years and that costs for each were the same. A review of roofing industry websites indicates that �le roofs have an es�mated life substan�ally longer than asphalt shingle roofs and that cost to install �le roofs is also much greater than the cost to install asphalt shingle roofs. Why did the builder misrepresent these facts at the Planning Commission Mee�ng? And why could the builder not specify the exact type of asphalt shingles he planned to use when ques�oned by the Planning Commission?
• Pads for houses in proposed subdivision will be built at approximately same eleva�on as the exis�ng houses along Blackberry Drive. What steps will be taken to ensure that the exis�ng retaining walls along Blackberry Drive houses will not be damaged during construc�on or in the future? • Grading and Drainage Plan for proposed subdivision indicates that overflow from the reten�on ponds at the South East and South West corners of the proposed subdivision will flow into the reten�on ponds in the exis�ng Silverado Creek Subdivision or be diverted into Silverado Creek, respec�vely. One or more houses in the Silverado Creek Subdivision are already in the flood plain; will this diversion of addi�onal water from the proposed subdivision result in addi�onal houses in the exis�ng subdivision being moved into the flood plain?
• Traffic Impact Study does not appear to include the addi�onal traffic that will appear on Villa Lane and Sierra Avenue once these two streets are connected. A substan�al amount of traffic already cuts through the South and South East por�on of the Silverado Creek Subdivision as a short-cut to subdivisions West of Silverado Creek Subdivision by avoiding the Trancas Street and Jefferson Street intersec�on. The traffic impact study for the proposed subdivision needs to include this addi�onal an�cipated short-cut traffic that will flow through the neighborhood once Villa Lane is no longer a dead end road.
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
Cit
y of Napa Water Rates
“You
don’t know the value of
water until the well runs dry”
- Ben Franklin
Nove
mber 07, 2023
“Whi
skey is for drinking...
Water is for fighting”
- Mark Twain
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental - Item 14.B.
From: City Staff
ATTACHMENT 1
2 • Water Supplies
Lake Hennessey
Milliken Reservoir
State Water Project
• Water Treatment - 3 Plants (43 MGD)
• Water Transmission
14 Storage Tanks (31 million gal)
10 Pump Stations
11 Regulator Stations
• Wat
er Distribution
360 miles of Pipelines
25,500 Water Services (City & Unincorporated
County)
$941 Million SystemCity of Napa Water System
ATTACHMENT 1
3 Annual Budget $38 Million
$6M annual Capital Improvements
24/7 Operation
68 full-time staff
Real-time monitoring at treatment plants
Hundreds of samples every week
Certified, licensed professionals
operating at all times
Turbidimeters
City of Napa Water System
ATTACHMENT 1
Water Rates Cost of Service
Revenue Collected
No taxes
>90% of revenue is bimonthly water bills
Cell tower leases, capacity fees/new connections
Costs to Operate and Invest in System
O&M
Capital Improvements
Non-recurring (Sanitary Survey of Watersheds,
Urban Water Mgmt Plan)
Detailed review 6 years ago in 2017
4 ... costs to provide
service
ATTACHMENT 1
Current Status of Water Enterprise
Rates not adjusted since October 2021
Budget deficit of $6.8M if we maintain $6M annual
CIP
commitment
Proposed Rates are necessary
Operate the system
Purchase water supply
Invest in infrastructure
… Re
liable System …
5
ATTACHMENT 1
6 Demand Projections
2001-2028
ATTACHMENT 1
Operating Expenses
Inflationary Increases
24/7 operation
68 staff ensure Regulatory Compliance
Water Supply - St ate Water Project (+$2M)
Treatment – Che micals (+$700k since 2020)
Distribution –Rep air Clamps, Fittings, Pipe
(+$250k)
Risk/Liability – (+$700k )
7
ATTACHMENT 1
8 No Rate Increase
Unable to maintain the same level of service
More s
ervice interruptions
Lack of capital investments results in higher operating costs & future capital replacement costs.
ATTACHMENT 1
9 Meets needs for operations, maintenance and water supply costs
Increases annual contribution to CIP from $6M to $8M by 2028
Prepares for 30-Yr Master Plan and Financial Plan
Supports $100M Bond issuance in 2027 ($7.2M annual debt service)
Proposed Rate Increase
Responsible Investment
ATTACHMENT 1
10 Identified CIP Needs
Water Quality - focus o n Hennessey Treatment Plant Upgrades in 2028-2030 ($80M)
Water Supply – Hennessey spillway expansion ($10M)
Water Transmission – 12-in on BV Road, 36-in AC main 17 miles ($4M/mile)
36-inch main river and creek crossing vulnerabilities
ATTACHMENT 1
11 Current and Proposed Rates
ATTACHMENT 1
12 Current and Proposed Rates
ATTACHMENT 1
13 Residential 1-in meter
Indoor Consumption: 8 units (4 units per month)
$42.57
$47.88
$53.62
$58.45
$68.81
$63.71
Typical Winter Monthly Bill
Adjustment is approximately $5 per month
52% of all bills will be at this level or lower
ATTACHMENT 1
14 Residential 1-in meter
In/Outdoor Consumption: 16 units (8 units per month)
$62.86
$72.32
$81.00
$88.29
$103.93
$96.23
Adjustment is approximately $8-10 per month
77% of all bills will be at this level or lower
Typical Summer Monthly Bill
ATTACHMENT 1
15 Typical Two Unit consumer
Adjustment is approximately $2.50-3.50 per month
15% of all bills will be at this level or lower
Residential 1-in meter
In/Outdoor Consumption: 2 units (1 unit per month)
ATTACHMENT 1
16 Typical Family of Four
ATTACHMENT 1
Assistance Programs
*RateShare Program – $25 per bill discount for low-income single family residential customers who are enrolled in PG&E CARE program.
Low Income Household Water Assistance Program (LIHWAP)- Administered through Dept of Health & Human Services, bills are paid directly to City of Napa as eligible utility. Extended thru March 31, 2024.
* RateShare Program is funded by non-rate revenue received from cell tower leases.
ATTACHMENT 1
18 * Total cost is higher; a portion of capital costs are paid through property taxes.
Comparison to Bay Area
ATTACHMENT 1
19 Clean, safe, reliable tap water:
• 1 penny per gallon
Value of Water
• Delivered!
ATTACHMENT 1
Clean safe, reliable, low-cost water for our customers Manage the system and invest in infrastructure to:
ensu
re system reliability
reduce long-term O&M costs
Responsible investment in critical
infra
structure
Water Enterprise Goals
ATTACHMENT 1
2024
Jan 1– A dopted Rates take effect
Mar 1 thru April 30 - Fi rst bills under new rates
delivered to customers
Next Steps if Approved
ATTACHMENT 1
Adopt a Resolution approving Water Rates Over a Five-
Year Period (2024-2028), for all Water Rate Customers
(Inside City and Outside City) Including Single-Family
Residential, Multi-Family Residential, Commercial,
Irrigation, Fire Service Charges, Pumped Zone
Surcharges, and Treat & Wheel Charges; and
Maintaining the Amount of Rateshare Program for Lower
Income Customers; and
Determining that the actions authorized by this resolution are exempt from CEQA.
Requested Action
ATTACHMENT 1
23 Questions
or
Comments
ATTACHMENT 1
From: Beth Painter
To: Clerk
Subject: Fwd: proposed water rate increase
Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 6:39:05 AM
Sent from Beth Painter's IPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Michael Weinberg
Date: September 26, 2023 at 8:47:36 PM PDT
To: Scott Sedgley <[email protected]>, Liz Alessio <[email protected]>, Beth Painter <[email protected]>, Mary Luros <[email protected]>, Bernie Narvaez <[email protected]> Subject: proposed water rate increase
[EXTERNAL]
Dear Mayor and City Council
I am not able to the public hearing regarding the proposed water rate increases, and these are my comments on the subject.
I am in favor of the proposed rate increases. Increasing water rates will encourage customers to be more thoughtful and waterwise. Also, the City should be looking for ways to help customers make smarter choices and provide additional resources so that customers can reduce their water usage.
Sincerely,
Michael Weinberg
Item 14.B.
ATTACHMENT 1
PL21-0063 Vintage Farm Subdivision
November 7, 2023
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental Item 14.A.
From: City Staff
ATTACHMENT 1
Vintage Farm Subdivision
VINTAGE FARM SUBDIVISION – 1185 SIERRA AVENUE
(PL21-0063) An application for a Tentative Subdivision Map and Design Review Permit to subdivide an approximately 10.45-acre property into 53 single-family residential lots with five (5) open space parcels, and a Design Review Permit for the house plans and “back-on” fence treatment, and a Use Permit to authorize the creation of five (5) flag lots at 1185 Sierra Avenue. The property is located within the Low Density Residential General Plan Designation, and the RI 4, Single-Family Infill, and FP, Floodplain Management Overlay Zoning Districts.
APNs: 038-250-035 and -037
Applicant: Davidon Homes
ATTACHMENT 1
Project Location
1185 Sierra Avenue
ATTACHMENT 1
Site Context
• Vintage Farm
• Approximately 10.45-acres
• Adjacent Right-of-Way
– Sierra Avenue
– Villa Lane
– Austin Miller Memorial
Bike Path
• Adjacent Uses
– North: Garfield Park
– East: Single-Family
Residential
– South: Single-Family
Residential
– West: Single-Family
Residential
ATTACHMENT 1
Project Description
• Tentative Subdivision Map
– 53 single-family residential lots
– Five (5) open space parcels
• Design Review
– Tentative Subdivision Map
– Four (4) house plan options
• Three (3) style options (A, B, C) for each house plan – “Back-on” fence treatment
• Use Permit
– Five (5) flag lots
ATTACHMENT 1
Property Designation
• General Plan
– Low Density Residential (3-8 du/acre)
– Approximately 10.45-acre property
– Min. 32 – Max. 83 units
• Zoning
– RI 4 – Single-Family Infill (Min. 4,000 sq. ft. lot size) – FP – Floodplain Management Overlay
ATTACHMENT 1
Tentative Map
Standard residential lots ranging
from 4,823 to 8,246 square feet
ATTACHMENT 1
Proposed House Plans
• Four (4) house plan options
– Plans 1 - 4
• One (1) single-story and three (3) two-story plan options • Three (3) style options (A, B, C) for each house plan – Plan 4 includes an alternate floor plan option that would include an attached ADU
• House plans
– Approximately 1,870 to 2,862 sq. ft. in size
– Heights range from 18’-9” to 28’-9”
ATTACHMENT 1
Single Story - Plan 1 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Single Story - Plan 1 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Single Story - Plan 1 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 2 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 2 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 2 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 3 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 3 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 3 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 4 (A)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 4 (B)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story - Plan 4 (C)
ATTACHMENT 1
Two Story – Plan 4 (ADU Alt)
STANDARD ADU ALT
• Attached ADU option in-lieu of first-floor bedroom
• Approximately 406 sq. ft.
• Subdivision may include up to 13 ADUs as part of Plan 4
ATTACHMENT 1
Access to Project Site
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Local Street
ATTACHMENT 1
Circulation
ATTACHMENT 1
Landscape Plan
ATTACHMENT 1
Flag Lots
ATTACHMENT 1
Planning Commission Meeting
October 05, 2023
• Commission discussion focused on –
• Generally pleased with the design of the subdivision, its compatibility with the existing neighborhood, and the Applicant’s willingness to expand upon prior architectural styles;
• During public comment, four (4) members of the public spoke voicing concerns and two (2) members representing Napa Valley Unified School District (NVUSD) in support of the Project;
• General concerns with the renderings showing window mullions that are “fake” and the roofing type choice. Project will contribute to climate change. City needs to consider objective standards for building to fight climate change and Applicant shall consider options for prospective home buyers.
• Planning Commission recommended approval by a vote of 3 – 1, with one abstention.
ATTACHMENT 1
Design Review Permit - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.62.050
Pursuant to NMC Section 17.62.050, a design review permit is required for subdivisions of five or more lots and for fence “side on” or “back on” treatments.
Home designs shall be submitted with the application for design review of the subdivision.
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.62.080 – Required
Findings
A. The project design is in accord with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan design policies.
B. The project design is consistent with applicable design review guidelines adopted by the City Council.
C. The design review permit is in accord with provisions of this title and will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity of the development site, or to the public health, safety or general welfare.
ATTACHMENT 1
Tentative Subdivision Map - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 16.20.070 – Required
Findings
A. That the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
B. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision, as described in the State Subdivision Map Act and any guidelines promulgated by the Council.
ATTACHMENT 1
Use Permit - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.08.020
Pursuant to NMC Section 17.08.020, the RI 4 Zone District allows a subdivision with 1 or more flag lots subject to the approval of a use permit.
Napa Municipal Code Section 17.60.070 – Required
Findings
A. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, applicable specific plans, the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purposes of the district and overlay district in which the site is located.
B. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity, or to the general welfare of the city.
C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the zoning ordinance.
ATTACHMENT 1
Tree Removal - Findings
Napa Municipal Code Section 12.45.090
The City Council’s approval of this project is subject to the required finding in NMC Section 12.45.090(B)(2)(d) relating to the removal of protected native trees. The Applicant requests the removal of two (2) Coast Live Oak trees and four (4) Valley Oak trees that are each classified as a Protected Native Tree pursuant to NMC Chapter 12.45.
Napa Municipal Code Section 12.45.090(B)(2)(d) –
Required Finding
A. The project has minimized tree loss to the extent possible when balanced with General Plan land uses and policies and applicable design guidelines.
ATTACHMENT 1
Recommendation
Adopt a resolution approving a Tentative Subdivision
Map and Design Review Permit to subdivide an
approximately 10.45-acre property into 53 single-family residential lots with five (5) open space parcels, a Design Review Permit for the house plans and “back-on” fence
treatment, and a Use Permit to authorize the creation of five (5) flag lots at 1185 Sierra Avenue, and determining that the actions authorized by the resolution were
adequately analyzed by a previous California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) action.
ATTACHMENT 1
End of Presentation
ATTACHMENT 1
Transportation Enhancements
There are multiple transportation enhancements/traffic calming features along the Sierra Avenue Extension and Villa Lane.
ATTACHMENT 1
Transportation Enhancements
There are multiple transportation enhancements/traffic calming features along the Sierra Avenue Extension and Villa Lane.
ATTACHMENT 1
Transportation Enhancements
There are multiple transportation enhancements/traffic calming features along the Sierra Avenue Extension and Villa Lane.
ATTACHMENT 1
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental - Item 14.A.
From: Applicant
ATTACHMENT 1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
ATTACHMENT 1
PROPOSED PROJECT
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
PERIMETER
ENHANCEMENTS
ATTACHMENT 1
EXISTING VILLA LANE
ATTACHMENT 1
SIERRA AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS
Austin Miller
Memorial Path
ATTACHMENT 1
SIERRA AVENUE
IMPROVEMENTS
Austin Miller
Memorial Path
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 1
1,870 sf
17 units (32%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 2
2,488 sf
12 units (23%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 3
2,565 sf
11 units (20%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 4
2,854 sf
ADU Option
13 units (25%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Street Scene Lots 3-8
Street Scene Lots 48-53
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
Standard Jr. Primary Bedroom Optional ADU
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 1
1,870 sf
17 units (32%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 2
2,488 sf
12 units (23%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 3
2,565 sf
11 units (20%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Plan 4
2,854 sf
ADU Option
13 units (25%)
ATTACHMENT 1
Vintage Farm Subdivision
Comments and Concerns Regarding Proposed Subdivision
Robert Gligorea, Blackberry Drive resident for 24 years
• Tenta�ve Subdivision Map and Design Review states that house plans descrip�on includes “back-on” and “side-on” fence treatment but doesn’t explain what this is. Numerous Google searches fail to find a descrip�on of what “back-on” or “side-on” fence treatment is. Need writen explana�on from builder to be able to provide appropriate comment.
• Will streets in new subdivision be wide enough to allow dual direc�on vehicle travel when vehicles are parked on both sides of the street? Streets in Silverado Creek Subdivision are not wide enough to permit this.
• Landscaping plan indicates that a majority of the exis�ng Sycamore trees on Villa Lane would be maintained except for 15 trees along the Southeast side of the project site that will be removed to allow an addi�onal street connec�on from Villa Lane to the internal streets as well as an addi�onal bioreten�on facility. There are currently only 29 Sycamore trees on the West side of Villa Lane. So it appears that a majority of the exis�ng trees will be cut down rather than be maintained. What is the requirement for these trees to be removed?
• The Landscaping plan indicates that the Sycamore trees to be cut down are along the Southeast side of the project site. However, a review of the detailed Landscaping Plan indicates that most of the trees to be cut down are along the Northeast side of the project? Which is it? • Dozens of people walk their dogs on the shaded sidewalk on the West side of Villa Lane each day. If the Sycamore trees are cut down, will addi�onal trees be planted to provide shade on this sidewalk or will there be no shade in the future on this sidewalk? Many of the people who walk their dogs on this sidewalk do not live within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision and will not have received any prior no�fica�on about this proposed subdivision nor the elimina�on of the shade on the sidewalk where they are currently walking their dogs.
• The Project Descrip�on Document indicates that the subdivision is designed with a rear yard landscape treatment along the East side of lots 24 to 32 adjacent to Villa Lane. The landscaping treatment will consist of a mixture of trees and small shrubs with a 6 foot tall fence. If the landscaping plan is to include trees, why are 15 mature Sycamore trees being removed? • The builder has not provided a plan to minimize dust during the building of the subdivision. Although comments were made during the planning commission that dust would only be a problem during the ini�al stages of construc�on when earth was being moved, that is not true for the soil types that are present on the construc�on site. During construc�on of the Silverado Creek Subdivision, there were 2 or more inches of loose soil on top of each lot and the evening winds caused a great deal of dust in our neighborhood.
• Will the houses in the new subdivision be added to the exis�ng Silverado Creek Maintenance District? This maintenance district is currently paying for the maintenance of the exis�ng landscaping along Villa Lane including tree trimming, landscape watering, and leaf pickup. Will the new homeowners’ associa�on for the proposed subdivision be taking over this responsibility or will the new homes become part of the Silverado Creek Maintenance District? • Sprinkler systems and drip-irriga�on systems on exis�ng homes in the Silverado Creek Subdivision were designed based on exis�ng water pressure in the supply lines to the subdivision. Are plans in place to
ATTACHMENT 1
ensure that adding a large number of new homes to the neighborhood won’t adversely affect water pressure in the Silverado Creek Subdivision?
• At Planning Commission Mee�ng, the builder indicated that asphalt shingle and concrete �le roofs each have an es�mated life of approximately 20 years and that costs for each were the same. A review of roofing industry websites indicates that �le roofs have an es�mated life substan�ally longer than asphalt shingle roofs and that cost to install �le roofs is also much greater than the cost to install asphalt shingle roofs. Why did the builder misrepresent these facts at the Planning Commission Mee�ng? And why could the builder not specify the exact type of asphalt shingles he planned to use when ques�oned by the Planning Commission?
• Pads for houses in proposed subdivision will be built at approximately same eleva�on as the exis�ng houses along Blackberry Drive. What steps will be taken to ensure that the exis�ng retaining walls along Blackberry Drive houses will not be damaged during construc�on or in the future? • Grading and Drainage Plan for proposed subdivision indicates that overflow from the reten�on ponds at the South East and South West corners of the proposed subdivision will flow into the reten�on ponds in the exis�ng Silverado Creek Subdivision or be diverted into Silverado Creek, respec�vely. One or more houses in the Silverado Creek Subdivision are already in the flood plain; will this diversion of addi�onal water from the proposed subdivision result in addi�onal houses in the exis�ng subdivision being moved into the flood plain?
• Traffic Impact Study does not appear to include the addi�onal traffic that will appear on Villa Lane and Sierra Avenue once these two streets are connected. A substan�al amount of traffic already cuts through the South and South East por�on of the Silverado Creek Subdivision as a short-cut to subdivisions West of Silverado Creek Subdivision by avoiding the Trancas Street and Jefferson Street intersec�on. The traffic impact study for the proposed subdivision needs to include this addi�onal an�cipated short-cut traffic that will flow through the neighborhood once Villa Lane is no longer a dead end road.
ATTACHMENT 1
ATTACHMENT 1
Cit
y of Napa Water Rates
“You
don’t know the value of
water until the well runs dry”
- Ben Franklin
Nove
mber 07, 2023
“Whi
skey is for drinking...
Water is for fighting”
- Mark Twain
City Council Regular Meeting
11/7/2023
Supplemental - Item 14.B.
From: City Staff
ATTACHMENT 1
2 • Water Supplies
Lake Hennessey
Milliken Reservoir
State Water Project
• Water Treatment - 3 Plants (43 MGD)
• Water Transmission
14 Storage Tanks (31 million gal)
10 Pump Stations
11 Regulator Stations
• Wat
er Distribution
360 miles of Pipelines
25,500 Water Services (City & Unincorporated
County)
$941 Million SystemCity of Napa Water System
ATTACHMENT 1
3 Annual Budget $38 Million
$6M annual Capital Improvements
24/7 Operation
68 full-time staff
Real-time monitoring at treatment plants
Hundreds of samples every week
Certified, licensed professionals
operating at all times
Turbidimeters
City of Napa Water System
ATTACHMENT 1
Water Rates Cost of Service
Revenue Collected
No taxes
>90% of revenue is bimonthly water bills
Cell tower leases, capacity fees/new connections
Costs to Operate and Invest in System
O&M
Capital Improvements
Non-recurring (Sanitary Survey of Watersheds,
Urban Water Mgmt Plan)
Detailed review 6 years ago in 2017
4 ... costs to provide
service
ATTACHMENT 1
Current Status of Water Enterprise
Rates not adjusted since October 2021
Budget deficit of $6.8M if we maintain $6M annual
CIP
commitment
Proposed Rates are necessary
Operate the system
Purchase water supply
Invest in infrastructure
… Re
liable System …
5
ATTACHMENT 1
6 Demand Projections
2001-2028
ATTACHMENT 1
Operating Expenses
Inflationary Increases
24/7 operation
68 staff ensure Regulatory Compliance
Water Supply - St ate Water Project (+$2M)
Treatment – Che micals (+$700k since 2020)
Distribution –Rep air Clamps, Fittings, Pipe
(+$250k)
Risk/Liability – (+$700k )
7
ATTACHMENT 1
8 No Rate Increase
Unable to maintain the same level of service
More s
ervice interruptions
Lack of capital investments results in higher operating costs & future capital replacement costs.
ATTACHMENT 1
9 Meets needs for operations, maintenance and water supply costs
Increases annual contribution to CIP from $6M to $8M by 2028
Prepares for 30-Yr Master Plan and Financial Plan
Supports $100M Bond issuance in 2027 ($7.2M annual debt service)
Proposed Rate Increase
Responsible Investment
ATTACHMENT 1
10 Identified CIP Needs
Water Quality - focus o n Hennessey Treatment Plant Upgrades in 2028-2030 ($80M)
Water Supply – Hennessey spillway expansion ($10M)
Water Transmission – 12-in on BV Road, 36-in AC main 17 miles ($4M/mile)
36-inch main river and creek crossing vulnerabilities
ATTACHMENT 1
11 Current and Proposed Rates
ATTACHMENT 1
12 Current and Proposed Rates
ATTACHMENT 1
13 Residential 1-in meter
Indoor Consumption: 8 units (4 units per month)
$42.57
$47.88
$53.62
$58.45
$68.81
$63.71
Typical Winter Monthly Bill
Adjustment is approximately $5 per month
52% of all bills will be at this level or lower
ATTACHMENT 1
14 Residential 1-in meter
In/Outdoor Consumption: 16 units (8 units per month)
$62.86
$72.32
$81.00
$88.29
$103.93
$96.23
Adjustment is approximately $8-10 per month
77% of all bills will be at this level or lower
Typical Summer Monthly Bill
ATTACHMENT 1
15 Typical Two Unit consumer
Adjustment is approximately $2.50-3.50 per month
15% of all bills will be at this level or lower
Residential 1-in meter
In/Outdoor Consumption: 2 units (1 unit per month)
ATTACHMENT 1
16 Typical Family of Four
ATTACHMENT 1
Assistance Programs
*RateShare Program – $25 per bill discount for low-income single family residential customers who are enrolled in PG&E CARE program.
Low Income Household Water Assistance Program (LIHWAP)- Administered through Dept of Health & Human Services, bills are paid directly to City of Napa as eligible utility. Extended thru March 31, 2024.
* RateShare Program is funded by non-rate revenue received from cell tower leases.
ATTACHMENT 1
18 * Total cost is higher; a portion of capital costs are paid through property taxes.
Comparison to Bay Area
ATTACHMENT 1
19 Clean, safe, reliable tap water:
• 1 penny per gallon
Value of Water
• Delivered!
ATTACHMENT 1
Clean safe, reliable, low-cost water for our customers Manage the system and invest in infrastructure to:
ensu
re system reliability
reduce long-term O&M costs
Responsible investment in critical
infra
structure
Water Enterprise Goals
ATTACHMENT 1
2024
Jan 1– A dopted Rates take effect
Mar 1 thru April 30 - Fi rst bills under new rates
delivered to customers
Next Steps if Approved
ATTACHMENT 1
Adopt a Resolution approving Water Rates Over a Five-
Year Period (2024-2028), for all Water Rate Customers
(Inside City and Outside City) Including Single-Family
Residential, Multi-Family Residential, Commercial,
Irrigation, Fire Service Charges, Pumped Zone
Surcharges, and Treat & Wheel Charges; and
Maintaining the Amount of Rateshare Program for Lower
Income Customers; and
Determining that the actions authorized by this resolution are exempt from CEQA.
Requested Action
ATTACHMENT 1
23 Questions
or
Comments
ATTACHMENT 1
From: Beth Painter
To: Clerk
Subject: Fwd: proposed water rate increase
Date: Wednesday, September 27, 2023 6:39:05 AM
Sent from Beth Painter's IPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: Michael Weinberg
Date: September 26, 2023 at 8:47:36 PM PDT
To: Scott Sedgley <[email protected]>, Liz Alessio <[email protected]>, Beth Painter <[email protected]>, Mary Luros <[email protected]>, Bernie Narvaez <[email protected]> Subject: proposed water rate increase
[EXTERNAL]
Dear Mayor and City Council
I am not able to the public hearing regarding the proposed water rate increases, and these are my comments on the subject.
I am in favor of the proposed rate increases. Increasing water rates will encourage customers to be more thoughtful and waterwise. Also, the City should be looking for ways to help customers make smarter choices and provide additional resources so that customers can reduce their water usage.
Sincerely,
Michael Weinberg
Item 14.B.
ATTACHMENT 1
<5oFPtl^V) 13
f^\ .^u9A^ ^M l^-^ ^
City Council MembersNov,2023
I have some general concerns regarding the availability of information to the public and specific concerns with my area.
At one time, it was possible to look at and read the General Plan at our local library, the Planning Department or at City Hall. You could also check out materials on an upcoming development or the General Plan from the Planning Department to take home overnight. Hard copy materials are no longer made available to the general public unless they pay for them. Can the City reinstate this practice? My major (and personal), concern is of the water diverted to Salvador Creek. Once upon a time, there were three creeks in the area that joined the Napa River at Trancas Crossing. Pre-1985, Garfield Park property frequently flooded and there was a seasonal pond on the north side of Garfield Ln.
The neighborhood is aware that there are flood events that occur at the Garfield bridge of Salvador Creek. Soon after the Silverado Creek subdivision was completed the area flooded. The city is aware there are problems but it does not address the increase of depth, frequency, velocity, nor the severe erosion caused by the flood events.
Shouldn't the city address these issues?
When the EIR and other studies were done for the Big Ranch Road Specific Plan (BRRSP), I was concerned about the species of interest. Amongst the life forms I had seen, there had been small blue butterflies, bats, salmon and western pond turtles that were of special concern. I was told that the salmon were only lost, that the creek was
ATTACHMENT 1
man-made so there would be no native salmon. I researched and found this to be inaccurate. The creek was man manipulated.
When the 2020 General Plan came into being, rather than making a new study or EIR for that property north and west of the specific plan area the city only extended the of BRRSP's coverage.
Recently, I became aware that the County Board of Supervisors had not disputed information passed on to FEMA. It was claimed that the Salvador Creek drained an area of 2.2 miles. At the time, I told the Board that this was not true.
Only recently, I had reason to contact FEMA. I believe they continue to use information that is not true. I was told that the information they receive comes from the City of Napa's Planning department. Can the Planning department verify what information they have sent on to FEMA?
The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) which is managed by FEMA posted on their website that "...just one inch of floodwater can cause up to $25,000 in damage..."
I understand that the City has 2 more projects that will ultimately drain to Salvador Creek within the Planning Dept. How can any hydrology study or plan be accurate if the information the study is based on is wrong?
I am concerned with the connection of Sierra Ave to Villa Lane. The City held meetings open to the general public and certain slowing down measures were agreed upon.
ATTACHMENT 1
Those measures are no longer a part of the new plan. The general public has not been made aware of this change. The walkability of the neighborhood will be lost. Will the city lower the speed limit thru the park property (as it is lowered thru park property on Garfield Ln)? The city had also agreed to make changes to the crossing at El Capitan Way. Is this still a part of the plan?
Sierra Ave is not wide enough to be considered a collector Street. From Lassen St east, to Jefferson, there are no sidewalks and people walk in the street. I believe it is most threatening after dark. I am concerned that it will only become more dangerous for those people who live on Sierra Ave, walk to the 7-11, and those children who attend the grammar school or families that attend church on Lassen St. at the very least, can the speed limit be lowered in this area?
Villa Lane is also dangerous. First of all, the directional signs painted on the streets have worn away and have been illegible for several years (I would take a can of white spray paint and fix it but I don't want to be arrested for the defacing of public property); can the City remedy this?
Trancas St to Blackberry can be treacherous. There are several elder seniors living who live and walk (using walkers) on Villa Ln. From 9 am to 5 pm (between Trancas St. and Firefly) cars are constantly entering and exiting doctor's or medical offices. They often fail to "look both ways" and just pull into the Lane. For safety's sake can the speed limit be lowered? Students walk to school walk to and from school along Villa Ln. Cars often speed to the north end of the lane.
If a death occurs on Villa Ln or Sierra Ave, will this connection be discontinued?
ATTACHMENT 1
0-
^
fi
yI
> \f
a.
^^A
^i
*••
^4
ft) s
(
«
t t I
\
t (f
f
I »
I
* (
^ li
I-
\
i
t
l)»w
!-•
'\
1 i »
<
f-
f
k•/
4 f '•• :9-
^^
^
^ ^..(I
N»'s
^
fc-
t <IPE;.»"- i
g
•il-.S'f-
K1
i t
H
<"i<
I r"1,* ;d"
>^':^&:|teE-*^..^'i£^%<?
I s I
ATTACHMENT 1
fit
v .^»%"^^
""'
1ffv~
^;; •
S^N P^BLO BA, / - .— " ^ -^ . \.;1^1^
^i ^^^uj^f-es, .0. \^&.."'' . ^. $:?/ 4:;yL" ,;"^/
^o^K. . &/^^^'6/.,^^ '^^K^£^
\N ^
^M
' •
LfftOIN(f
Et- C,£SB o-jl^^^T&l^r
;Si^^p^^
ATTACHMENT 1
^w••»
.<s^* «
s
?<»'0
s ^ B
» 1 »»
^
^
I".
»
»'
:^^
t«
w
•
?•
••
», »
v?4 »
»*•^^ ^t.1
»,
•*
*'.-•
^
0 <
"•
•
if• ^*J-t .<(•»'^, ^
^
s ^.<•
%»«.
.»
It
^
(t
A» »
\ <•<*v •
•^ s
f%«» »<(
^
t^••
M.»t
^»<t"
^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^^\
ȣs's
^.:
»
t^
9 ^
t»»« ?;
•
^. ^1
»•^
A
»
^^ <. •
»
•t
<ll• » »
*
<(•
^%
1 ^1 ^
»* t
<^1 "k
s •t
» ?
<,*
s?
^.;.y t
J9
^
•^ *
t y"^t»»
•s.^s
t.^
«»
•
^
» <(
»
•^
v^»." %»
^
1^ ».»*»<
•I^ ^t c%
t
• w.t6»% •i "
1»<
»^ v y.;
.< ^.
<
^
^ •i
^
^
»
t\
\•• *
T.\*B
». w
t
s»^
,;
t
^
'-».
»>4
^
y^
ftv ^*
^-» s'«»./- l.,'A*
N
.-» ^ M
^••
s;7'*•
y
•
•t^ /-•-.^^ ?»^'
r ^9^ ^
s'^<»
^
^-?]
^•^ ^m
f- s.
»» ^
,+•^>
% •^fK
^^<
p;«,•
» ";
t
/ ^
^
^•A h ^
g
?'* ^•s^
m amIfe<J
^
>;
r»i- ^'s
^
^t
4.'-
^»
I-%'^.':-^
tt <
t1;\
•^\
.*Ifc
^\
fc
^
i»*
^ «t
V
^"
-M^
»
'^m.<,i
¥^A
6«8,^^v
yv,•;•*
b;,:^•.i»r.t .1
•<
ATTACHMENT 1
V-'.
V
s' ^ »--
•^^
*<
\ -:-'•
'/-
&
^.•fl -^ft -^A'-^^
•\&
Y% ^
^ ^/.^
^
^ ^
c'»'
i .^ ^
'I ^'.•;' ^
^
^
100
K
^
..°
%
^
M
:'..
^<•{•
^ <•^..
^.
.y-
^•*
^
\:y.
.>•
;1M
••'0
x ^ ..* •/t:'.&•
^.
^:' ;
»
-•--
^
»
(..
•o
.< •/^
^ Oak Knoll
—%-
/
.,'.f
%^
'Windmill
^
^3'-^>&
^•"',D
^s '-'-'':
m
-.^••
^lie
s'/.;
.^
•^'•:• -.20^
'/.t'. A..
'10 -,
^
-<
-^
••»
s. ^ %
*'
^
r.. ''^
tf
\^
^
v
^
'^. ^ =<•
^ ^ ;i
^m
cf<f
toe ••
li ^x *.
1 r\
T.!
'•^. ^^ ^
^
.\^ .\.@ M^
v^'-^€
Trailer?;^:.
^.
101
•\'
0 ^
5-
•^^J '•s.^•^.°li
A^
<"^N^
^"
:v-
<\.
\"<•*•«
.-•• •:^
^
d
Y^^
^
"'..
x^
t<
.<•"" ^
°.'
m^r^ 50.
^•-
&
",
^~
:%A^
T%ller1i-s
^
^.
z.60 ^i^
-^'
^ i'-S ^ ^^
,??
\i^:m •s -y
u
<»
^ *« •^
.<
'^':<«1
..'
;"•
.'s'^ ^y<A.^. roC.^';
^ "«.'.\ Kl Cn
^
Sch
^ s^.
»;
ym ^- ^ ,.•
rF i^c<o
•^
••»• ^ i
^ J ^ „.''
f.
•^^
^
•'c
.^.
/
^^:'~^^~ ^•s
I-BM7 ^
T<»
^
r
^
^
,^» ^f^tS
3^:-^
•^
y ^'^
,^
••0"). .-^ ,'
;< .'-'
t'
'•s
--^' i^
\
^^^" •^^5^r,
^y,
•^s%
>?
^ r^
•\
••
^\*^ ^\
*;••. Sl
^:f^
^:^
^
^ ^ ;<>•=•3=V-:
'I S£.."••>!
^^^Ss
^>:
.0
w
c.^
.,°.*g;^^fjuw^
^ ?<':
^
^^
IJ^IQ-?
v
^.
^
%?
.•.•/<ol
^-> v'^.
..'r.eii
<*BM4 ^
^-
\;
c
^"A 3c .IrKi;cl A
^'^
I
B°°.' ??• %
-f
;•
^
^s^.
w.."
^ \-
'.»
tf°
^
Siv
tf •)\i.
•••
^
F. ^^s&
•^
-.£^
•'1^%.»°
;••«; 1
^/
;».*
p.
•°•°5<s
^'"^^ ^
6^
a
15 »• ^
l>L'tQ"n,r^acr .^, ^ s.
-^-
lj,fc£cli
1 ^-
a I-
1\;
w^.
?i *?
te?!3
m^u
^
•'.e^
^^
t-^3=
^
0 ^
s\':
m0^Ar
•*h-
•t
'.^;'~
•• §^ if •r"•»
s'•^
^^^(^ :7^^)y^<^^^^- f ^K^^^
ATTACHMENT 1
^-: •^
.^-•^-<n
!*ff^
\i ^
^ V /g-
^
^ f
's
^ s;
^
••»"•<»
.-3
•^
I'--:
X•^\•
fj
•K•^
\ '«
r^ss& fl,
1 <<
'*}
V.v«<
«r
»^
v>^
-/ 'y
%•
^
\ */^y
*as•;'"• s*.i •If-»» ^ ^'-;
»x^ •*.(<,? ^\
^^^
6 ^
^.
1-".
.»
t^^ \^ ';.
-'
,»
^\w ^
\
^
r:
^ •t
^
-^i
•*•.-M
^s
\
i f
/«^ ^;*i
^.'
^
4 ./
«%. 4
^
•o,
•••>
'•-;.
»
^
'< «i
v \
*-*'
-M v
•^f'
•»! <.< .r
I ss^,;'^- ,'.
4( '^
I*
B
4/ ^i t» <sl
<•
^ f 41
%..
»*-
s
*.' Sti»^
y ^
»:
^
R\ ®
St
f
"$
:..'
».
^"^ ^
-^
:.f .c-5 -*':
^
y^^ *^ »^\> •s\
*'^
^.
^-t
^\^?f
';>
,f
$ ^^-^%
\
f^, •'< -^ ^^'.I ^^'-^
(*
,^ :•„
\
^
^
%
^
^.
^\
\•'*"
^-
t
•E^*?••
#
\
<r^^ ^^
^^^f ''^^
vy^^
w
=..*
^\
r<i' ^•••t
\<•J^c-'"<\
«^ •-•^
^s •^ *%
^
4. •*•
^-; •"
(28-'s
^slti
^> '<»^^t
•^y-^^ M^
^
\f
>ft
^ ^
1 ^ £. ^
-->
V-;
^
A^;•; \.
*-.>.-s:
i
^
5^r
m,^ !;
<-»
£^
•s-:'•f-..
•-/ Th*
^ s;>
^•A ^
'•V-nt ••»>
^1
•V
0 ^^^-^
^
1k%"
1\^ •«
m
*<•
u
^
.»/
\ ^1K
^
^
t;
^
? ?•;^
>
^
cm^
^"<
'^
^ ^?» f
^ ^ »'^
-•
>••»^ ?-£
a
4 ^^w.
^•>••:••^>^4 3k;
% :.<^^>i
»\
•iC
9 ^
*<<p<•^ t
^-^ft^ JiW
'^.
< ^ 71
\ fl'^
t?^^r,<
;
\.- \ ^ 4 •^';'xi\.
^
t< ^3 ^ ^\ ^ f--'
!.,
« ^
-•<.
«[1
^
^ t
£'- •<
/&.r?
>
»i
'-"•..
f.'.
s
fa? ^
lr
•^ &
;r:^ —^
r^s ^1?<
5. ft*
^f^
v
/•^^
-•<.
'» ^•"«.
f-* ^
^1 t^
.V
•»
?
--,«.
i 7y.
•»3
^
*-
^'.11-?
^ •':?V
t
^^ /^ ^^.
'^^
^ ^
s^fp-y *.
'•,
^
•^
k-
*> '(• ^s^-?.- ^
•^
^>«a
•'•«^ ^
an*Ja& \-^
ATTACHMENT 1
a®
3 ^*
w-
»r &
^
Wl
« ^^a
k,i< •%
<(.^
*
y € I
«,
^
I
m
^
w.
a
•V *
^
I»
i.l:l..::ait
1 s^ 3
i-
a»
I
m
Ih "••s a
»s
t
ISlm
B
li^ a-~^^
m
!•
i»^t
a»^^
Ica a
^)3»
i y ^a St ^K iS9iWH •«»
^
i^cI'1 3 «T»»B -I/ii1 h,B<s~» IB
^bI I I yI
» ^
»>..
a:, ti
a
f. s»
t
If
t
)
at I »s
a,
KIll.1
t»a^
I
sm ,1
I< %» »fi
^ sf»? w
:&
g
««B'(S
ft ^»sg••
.1
^v ^»-.. t
I •-t<It .jl
1 -ig
a
I^ill
ls"i I"<w
W*5-:.'
m
»<^ t«
"a» I-r"•f
t s(S*
%.^*y i
a.K »
sm »•«m
'e-~''^^,,^^_::tB.,I.3iwt?
.Ihs,^ . • a8' '^
^m EW '%,..*..
!i »l«
^. I» ^
y !"
i g
^
s
ak
tfI
/
«
ALi:
ATTACHMENT 1
. ^'.-^ ..^
«"
's
^rm
„-«- • ;,..1>.h .,;,.,„:.."'t ?i
iK 's
s' •
»'*t'.: ..i'?c*
^<k
s
f
t ? ,
tf
A) \ I<^
^ffij
1 .t
--^
<^
') (
ft
fe
^ !it ^ Ik-W
.*
s
^
&
s
;?
m^^
ATTACHMENT 1
0 5
^ ^LL^
/
<J
A<sr<»
:•"'•-.MS,,.< ••
•^
0 0 ^0 10
\l ^^
T/fueoor M
BW
^
'A-/tf It.
i^ v
&^
A
y^' ^
</FW
.-t-
\ 'OWf OflLI
yy<5"' 0HOT\S)»^7^S,
'A<d
^
s";•/-<•'/? 0
^00(^
ON~h
'^
Tuloca
?1
fj^sw/rc ? £
?• sS-
:-^fg.
sg r
• •u.
•5"<A7- -» ^S-y/t/
A
•^>
SUCH. ^c^^
^
?1[Z ^
5<» •£V,
0 ^ ^w^ W?G/
r :<?irf.
/
^
l/fvu
•f: ^"^
:"^?1
i^a..;^^
^3^ ^ ^,^T-
^'-?
^
X'^ it;
:. /),7/>S'c> 'S£^/7S/^-a •^:> ^
w
.<
°.
^
r^ ^
A
^^
1^^
y_
^ ^ I
s, /^
MA
.^J^
i
/?
.^?
">
^-
^
s
fe5
^ £^
;;
^
'AL
0 &.<
^.
'<
^
^
(/ SAJVPY{BL0B
•s^^&'^ h^-'M&VftLLEJO JuNCTf /^AJ
5^; 4:7^-& /^/Li ^^'^^.^
Lf/VDlNCf
£L G{ eg BO
0 0°c"^ 4W i.1
^^^^^ u"r
^.¥]
ATTACHMENT 1
X-:. J-1-'1^
^ ^^
") ,^^Mile
•^ ^i-
^
/ 1
^/ ^ ,"<
5\-^^ ^0 L•a /< vs^ ^
^ ^(:<
^^^ ••
."• ••'0»'.^-I
\< ii«=;
^? .^ .noilI:T •mLS3
•y;s:
^i^&-'^^ Windmill
,--;
,^ .^/-^
-;.p ?c
^
•\^t^
•I 1
^s^ ^^- .:£••^i•';^ °%11^"•'•'•: ^'^ ^=-
^^ l'<
w ^ ^
-^^
^^i ^% zv^fc^;•^
°.
»-•
r^^ :K^
^- •.•••»^I^^^
>:::v•^ •s'.
•T^m^•. ^
f:
<^?• ^.f•-I z
.-;'£;'
^:': :\c^ ^^ itraOO^.^ t<-h
i
\
^t^ ^ J••»*
^m. iS
V'
-s^TS^ ^.
^^ ''.. ^
^N ^ BM
^ ^ •^A- :-'.;..,^ s>.
*' ,$'^^ ?•^ ,'
r^ ••> —A5 ^^ (I -\^ r:^ ^s?'^•-An:ooii )i^^-';.°^ ?^^:-^^ 0 ^•^~\ ^0 m.^Ketlr;
A"-•BM :"1C
^ IF£^? S^"».«i^ ^
!?<;.y
s3 h\. »51,F.' ;•;•••:
^-";iy wK.
^•""^^ ^^^4f i
y
^ ^['-'un
Sd ;sc;-^--
—-•
^T' -y-^^ w-i3te ^ ^il -^ (6•• % ?.5^.;-•:
^t .^
•I-i .V-3€, t^wK4r" '•s':
ATTACHMENT 1
's*' "•.'*.
t^
*?t s« w..m '"*.%
f \'
?"t^ &i
m J»t
•?-t^
*-
a
-.1*
^
»^^
M
*
-s^ ;.<. •»'i
s.;-'
:.
^^'fit
%-1.<
;i
\
s:
t
.i>
f \
f3 I-^
>aE»
BS-t'
t.t
'I
^
^
"f
«
t s
^••V
m^
1 V-
f,
^&^ ^ .«vk^ •w
k-.
S^i^".^
^
;-.'
/ %'•si•f
s•sf,
&.
?!••
^.'•i-
m '*'
»^
E~
•I•\
s^
"•?
m m
K?
wr/-»•» »>-.i m
•^
^m ^
».-
f^^ ^ t
^
nsf
^-».
•^^;
.;;
,.<
^
•*^
^1••?»
.'••
"V
%•;:':.;
:1
-3
^ ^
»^^
•V%
y.:~.
k
K^
^?\
I
'^
,%
y
.\
%
I•«,
^
t
*
'**
\
^.»
»
?-•
\,
s<
•
M
SL%
^
<v
s
^
%*-.
•^
^
m »»
•^
\^.
'•••«
^
^
»
S1?
»fc •t
i
^
•n
^
a
•j;>-
•»<
^
^.*
t»<
8*1
•^-
^<•<b.*
ftw»a*
t *»»
*
^
»
»
*^^ )•
^^ •X
^% »»<
\
s' <f-fiy:
>^
<M ^
^v<
••
'.%
^
K
^
»
«'s<
s^
y
^\^^«
»%s
# t'^
r
*
t^
*0
li
II1^
^
«^I
»
»\
<1
»
*.
«f -*
»
<t A<»
^
^
•*^
«•
^
^•F
<r»,
\€
»
^
*•
»<»
^
^
»
t
"t
»
^
As •k
> «
v
»
»
^
s
s
Is^
«ll
»f\
^
*
m
»
t.
^:»<
At
»
B»
%.»
f k
^ fc
<f
^
•fe
^ t.
»
:v
»
<
&'s
*
\
^.»t
»^ »^
»^'» \
t
s?&9
*»
%v »»*^ >
<»,^
^^*.
^
•
r^
•
»
<f*••% "»
»^
^
^
•
*
^,»•
s;*
^ hI h^.^ »t*
<*
* »<
\
*»
*.
^
^ <*
•<4
t
'it*
^ <
^«
•
^'1^<
s'. ^*-•<:
4'
mfc
ms. «:?»
A ftv^s.^ <c^
»*
*B •yt^ •»a.
f
^f»,1I
»'
s ^
* -A
%*k.,* *'•»•
1 It> r*»
%» ^<^ •*<L
«
^
»• '•
•
•
»
*
•-»
A\
•»
\ .«
^^ \^
».^ t*^<»< 4
•
±
-t.*
^^
*~\^
\
ATTACHMENT 1
s.\
\^
&^
^
,•-;
\
,/
%^ »-. /^ -3:?-^ •^t\2 •%; ^•V >f. <.^ .:
•f ;^-"» »•^t.
\ :*';•s.^ *-* ^t»*; ,t
^ ^ \.T,
•\-<VL•»•<- \
•<
^
fl»•/^ ^
<i~ ?..•- ^* s
^ \^(
^s;:<,?. ^"
^
^ \^
\ ^
7 ^•\ -k'•^ ^
-t «»!-; ^
t^/,« •t
/ "?y»•:
* ^J ^^.
•^
;-.: 4 ^
0 < '^ V(- A- v
*
^ <- t \
>:«E
;
»\-..'
a?
*fri «<:^ r''•.t ^ *^ f^'f w..
V
a
^^$?'-? 'f11 ^ *. T'?«, ^^ zTIs^S'X;-. v;t ;-iS;•<'
^i^ ;/J•s•4 4*"^ ^1^.•5;: \
2\^ .s f -^•>^
•^
^•u7f
^ ••"•'•^<•X0- »
^
^>-^»S»i •^ •<
^ \-i•-A. •I.i. f
fS
>>:;^
m^ ;•.",•>•\ a•i
f^
<<•^•'••
I
:'*» V-
^./ '; M^m^ .M ^m
'. \^^
3. ^€.%
^A•i. % ^
•> '••s.
•:* n: -
<.
^
\^\ y •^rf\ •'•
^>. -.s >,-+'i~ ^? f-'•'-^- >-..sr ?-.<.
^
a';>\ ^-/<
.^Vr :
<•ft
.<-» >\.
^
-i<\ •*„
". »<yt
v*
<;:?^ ^••f-.m »-":^ '•»•^ •'•^ K
^
t' £^
^
<*r <t't 5l': •\
^ ''«•^^ i \(<• & -•*• UL,
>5.'. kV'
^
te >> .-^'&•:;: i?s .^'^
:.;.f
?
».
i??
^, ^%M /
<r;'.r
^ <t 3
^•>:•:;- %^
'•4*
m
iW-. g<z^ ^
m. ^ c-\^ ..-«: •ys•-a /»'
c» .';
\- '4' &.••:;sI* I»'. %•^,*. ^ •»:-x ^•it »: I f
^^ \.-'•^ Ar^^ V. •t
^^ r:
V,% —
/;^fet n
^
;•<:
»•
K \ry.-. <^ «. ^^m ^t
!^."? ^
,-t
'«•J> ;•
^-^ ^-*-•^
*-.~•^
." \
•/. ^ .*<NC3
^
I V,7
ATTACHMENT 1
Flow (cfs)
§
c
s
8 u
0 MJ
g M
U1
pp.
8 ^
8 8
g
8 u
?FS>
§ 8
0 U1
ATTACHMENT 1
siisa
mv
~tM"
: *',.:''
» /:;
^
ATTACHMENT 1
VW^... .^'f" ^v. v^.K •l^^' • ^' ^^1.-^^m.
t
'^.-
I
m
k?^' '•"'• v ' ^' .^!
.^ . 's:"-y
A
\ff
^,*
^
rsyiNII3
•V
,ySS^-'-wf^f^-»
fcs-
">WN*ysilfetA^% »w
<ar> .^w»
»-r
ast*;
e
a -I*
T
.^»<.2S.;
s-1
«*»•
-T?TAJ -^<D]^
ATTACHMENT 1