ATCH 1 - Stantec Proposal — Napa City Council, December 19, 2023

SECTION 1
City of Napa
Request for Proposal for CEQA Analysis for
South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project
July 18, 2023 (Updated October 23, 2023)
Attention: Prepared By:

Ryder Dilley, Associate Planner Stantec Consulting Services Inc.

Planning Department 1340 Treat Boulevard, Suite 300
Napa, CA 94559 Walnut Creek, CA 94597
ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 1

A. Cover Letter
July 18, 2023; Updated October 23, 2023
City of Napa
Planning Department
Attn: Mr. Ryder Dilley, Associate Planner
Submitted via email: [email protected]
Dear Mr. Dilley:

Reference: Proposal for Environmental Services for the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project Stantec Consulting Services Inc. (Stantec) is honored to present this proposal, offering our expertise to assist the City of Napa (City; Napa) with the environmental review for the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project (Project). We have carefully reviewed the Project information and request for proposal (RFP) provided by the City on June 26, 2023, and fully comprehend the City's need for the preparation of an Initial Study and other necessary documentation as mandated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Additionally, we are prepared to undertake associated technical studies for the proposed approximately 6.7-acre waterfront development situated at 585-601 First Street and 933 Water Street (and includes 876 Water Street).

At Stantec, we take immense pride in being a comprehensive firm offering the in-house ability to execute all necessary studies and evaluations to support the City, boasting a team of accomplished project managers, engineers, planners, and scientists with extensive experience collaborating with municipalities on projects akin to the remarkable South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project. Our recent track record showcases our capability to successfully complete multiple waterfront mixed-use infill developments in the Bay Area, including noteworthy projects such as:
• Northern Waterfront 30-acre Mixed-Use Development Project, Vallejo • Mare Island Connolly Corridor Mixed-Use Development Project, Vallejo • Sacramento Waterfront Redevelopment Project, Sacramento • San Diego Seaport Waterfront Redevelopment Project, San Diego • Various Moffett Federal Airfield Demolition and Improvement Projects, Sunnyvale In our proposal, we highlight our exceptional proficiency in working with public sector clients and regulatory agencies on complex projects around the Bay Area. This adeptness enables us to develop responsible and defensible CEQA documents while remaining mindful of the public disclosure process and helping the City maintain public trust. The success and repeat business secured by our team serve as a testament to their planning expertise and mastery of CEQA.

Over the years, Stantec has achieved excellence in completing numerous environmental and planning documents, ensuring full compliance with CEQA. Our approach incorporates CEQA streamlining strategies, such as "Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning" (California PRC Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183), "Infill Exemption" (California Senate Bill (SB) 226 Streamlining), and "Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment" (SCEA) provisions under SB 375.Our proficiency in streamlining the CEQA review process is evident through significant projects, including the Bay Area's inaugural SCEA for the 240-unit affordable senior Brunswick Street Apartment Project in Daly City and Oakland's most substantial senior affordable apartment project to date, comprising 540 units. Having successfully completed hundreds of environmental evaluations (CEQA), permitting, and compliance requirements in the Bay Area, we showcase our diverse and extensive experience.

To support the City with the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project, we proudly present our accomplished team, recognized and awarded by the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) for their exceptional ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 2

work over the past three years. Notably, our team has received Outstanding CEQA Documents awards for projects in Oakland and Santa Rosa in 2020, as well as Environmental Analysis Document Merit Awards for projects in Daly City and Santa Rosa in 2022 and 2023, respectively. These esteemed accolades truly highlight Stantec's unwavering dedication to delivering outstanding results while ensuring legal defensibility.

Our proposed Management team is composed of seasoned CEQA practitioners and technical specialists, led by the accomplished Principal-in-Charge, Trevor Macenski, and the experienced Project Manager, Anna Radonich.

Their leadership brings a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the table. Notably, both Trevor and Anna offer unique perspectives on the CEQA process, drawing from their respective community involvements as elected officials serving on the City Council of Benicia and as a Planning Commissioner in the City of Lafayette. Together, they have seamlessly collaborated on more than 50 CEQA documents in the last five years, with approximately a dozen of these projects involving waterfront, mixed-use, and infill developments akin to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project. This extensive experience ensures that our team possesses an intimate understanding of the intricacies and challenges involved in such developments, enabling us to navigate the complexities of you Project with finesse and expertise.

Our team's collective knowledge, diverse expertise, and proven track record highlight our commitment to delivering legally defensible CEQA documents with outstanding quality. At Stantec, we take great pride in assembling a passionate team with impressive credentials that embraces responsible development, enriching both communities and the environment. We eagerly anticipate bringing our wealth of experience, dedication, and expertise to ensure the success of the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project.

REQUIRED STATEMENTS.
• We have reviewed your proposed Services Agreement (Agreement) and, should we be selected for this assignment, we will be able to conclude a mutually satisfactory contract with you. Stantec recently completed a project with the City utilizing the same Agreement and successfully came to a mutually satisfactory contract with the City, on that project.
• Trevor Macenski is authorized to commit Stantec to adhere to the performance standards in the request for qualifications.
• We acknowledge receipt of Response to Information Request Addenda dated July 6, 2023. • Established in 1954, Stantec is a corporation organization incorporated in the state of New York. • Stantec’s contact information:

Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
1340 Treat Blvd, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Phone: 916.508.4170; Website: www.stantec.com
• Stantec’s Primary Representative (for purposed of this RFP):

Trevor Macenski, Senior Principal, US West – Planning Practice Leader Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
1340 Treat Blvd, Suite 300, Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Phone: 916.508.4170; Email: [email protected]

We look forward to speaking to you soon. As our primary point of contact, Trevor Macenski is available to discuss our qualifications and answer any questions the City may have.

Sincerely,

Trevor Macenski
Senior Principal, US West – Planning Practice Leader:
916.508.4170
[email protected]

Anna Radonich
Principal Planner
925.285.6541
[email protected]
ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 3

B. General Qualifications
Established in 1954, the Stantec community brings together approximately 25,000 employees working in over 400 locations across six continents. Our collaborative approach spans various disciplines and industries, enabling us to bring to life diverse projects in buildings, energy and resource management, environmental conservation, water management, and infrastructure development. We are dedicated to serving the communities and individuals we work with, fostering long-term relationships.

With a global team of over 3,000 environmental professionals, we pride ourselves on being a knowledge -based organization. Our employees are passionate about their work and strive to deliver exceptional results.

For more than two decades, our California Planning and Environmental Services team has been assisting municipalities. We have a track record of producing accurate assessments and disclosure documents that thoroughly evaluate impacts. Our primary objective is to support the City in preparing a high-quality environmental document for the Project that complies with CEQA. We aim to achieve this in the most time-efficient, technically sound, and cost-effective manner possible.

LOCAL PRESENCE +

RESOURCES
Stantec maintains offices in
six locations in the San
Francisco Bay Area. This
concentrated geographic
range is specifically designed
to help ensure Stantec has
staff resources strategically
located to provide
comprehensive coverage of
the respective geographies in
the greater Bay Area. Each of
these offices comes under the
leadership of Trevor
Macenski, Principal-in-Charge,
who will manage staffing
resources in accordance with
Project schedules, required
technical expertise, and
budgets. Our company’s
collaborative approach to
sharing resources throughout
the region and beyond allows
us to deliver the best person
for the job or task at hand.

Our Walnut Creek office will
provide the local expertise and
boots on the ground
coordination. In addition, to
augment our local expertise, if
a specific technical issue or question arises, we
are able to respond to the City’s needs using
direct technical resources within the state and
nationwide.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 4

C. Experience
At Stantec, our journey is defined by over 20 years of unwavering expertise, commitment, and passion for excellence in environmental consulting and engineering services. With a global presence and a local focus, we take pride in being at the forefront of innovation, sustainability, and responsible development.

Our diverse team of skilled professionals, including project managers, engineers, planners, and scientists, brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to every endeavor. From the initial planning stages to the final implementation, we approach each project with meticulous attention to detail, ensuring alignment with environmental regulations and community aspirations. Our commitment to excellence in CEQA compliance and agency permitting allows us to streamline processes, reduce risks, and drive successful outcomes for our clients.

Throughout our journey, we have earned the trust of clients worldwide, navigating the complexities of environmental challenges and delivering tailored solutions that consistently exceed expectations. Our experience spans a wide range of projects, from master planning and design to permitting for significant developments, such as the Bay Area's largest military base reuse projects, the redevelopment of Vallejo's Northern Waterfront, and the transformation of the Sacramento Waterfront. Additionally, our expertise extends to over 60 local public sector entitlement and environmental compliance projects in the Bay Area in just the past 5 years.

Our team thrives on repeat business, a testament to the satisfaction of our clients and the exce ptional work provided by our local environmental planning team. The experience, expertise, and services we offer align closely with projects similar to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project.

Our highlighted experiences encompass various sectors, including:

WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENTS: From remediation to CEQA
documentation and the complexities of permitting and agency compliance, our extensive experience in waterfront projects both within and beyond the Bay Area demonstrates our proficiency in navigating the unique challenges of waterfront development.

Stantec's expertise extends to handling agency permitting with entities such as the Army Corps of Engineers, Flood Protection Boards, Regional Water Quality Control Board, US Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Game. We regularly prepare CEQA and permitting packages for projects that interface urban uses with waterways. Moreover, tackling careful consideration and adaptation to sea -level rise and flooding and how that plays into the CEQA process to ensure waterfront developments remain resilient and sustainable over time. By integrating best practices in environmental planning and engineering, we create enduring waterfront spaces that harmonize with their natural surroundings, enhance the community, and withstand the challenges posed by changing coastal conditions.

HOTEL & DESTINATION USES: At Stantec, our expertise in
preparing CEQA documents extends to hotel and destination use projects, where we are committed to carefully assessing the unique impacts and opportunities that arise from such developments to create responsible and sustainable hospitality spaces. We understand that successful hotel and destination projects should seamlessly blend with the character and cultural essence of the surrounding area. When it comes to Use-Driven Impacts and Regional Events, we are keen on understanding the potential increase in visitor traffic and demands on local infrastructure during regional events or promotional activities. By analyzing these factors, we ensure that our projects can effectively accommodate fluctuations and mitigate any short-term impacts, minimizing disruption to the community. In evaluating these types of uses, on the Total Number of Rooms/Keys are the driver, and we use this to conduct a thorough analysis of the project's impacts. This comprehensive assessment includes considerations of water and energy consumption, waste generation, traffic patterns, transportation impacts, and overall ecological footprint.

Understanding the implications of the project's scale empowers us to recommend appropriate mitigation CIA, First Street Bridge, Napa, CA

First Street Bridge, Napa River
ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 5

measures and design choices, thereby reducing negative environmental effects. Additionally , addressing parking demands and promoting sustainable transportation options is essential for projects like South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project. Hence, we incorporate Shared Parking Strategies and Mobility Services in our CEQA documents for hotel and destination projects. Our shared parking strategies optimize parking space utilization by accommodating different land uses within the same facilities. Additionally, our consideration of various mobility services, such as shuttle programs, bike-sharing initiatives, and public transportation connectivity, helps us mitigate traffic congestion and minimize the overall environmental impact of the development.

HISTORIC RESOURCES: At Stantec, we recognize the
paramount importance of adhering to historic preservation guidelines in the dynamic landscape of California development.

Our team boasts extensive experience in collaborating with state and federal authorities, enabling us to excel in handling complex projects within historic districts. We are dedicated to achieving a seamless integration of history and modernity in every endeavor we undertake.

Our team is well-versed in the Department of the Interior Standards for Historic Preservation, which serve as a cornerstone in our approach to historical district development. This expertise allows us to navigate the intricate guidelines effectively, ensuring that our projects respect the unique character and heritage of the area. This coupled with understanding the Nuance of Eligible and Historic Structures in Historic Districts: Preservation within historic districts often involves distinguishing between eligible and historic structures. With our in-depth understanding of this nuanced aspect, we can identify and carefully address the significance of each structure, preserving the essential elements while accommodating the project's needs.

Our team possesses a comprehensive understanding of the difference between direct and indirect effec ts analysis in historic district development. This knowledge empowers us to accurately assess the potential impacts of our projects on the surrounding historic fabric and implement appropriate measures to safeguard the district's integrity. Stantec has valuable recent experience in dealing with historic building demolitions and mitigation strategies. Our portfolio includes support for the largest demolition of a historic structure in the Western US, as well as evaluating and mitigating the relocation of multiple historic buildings. Through meticulous planning and innovative strategies, we ensure that these actions are carried out responsibly, preserving the district's heritage while progressing towards the project's objectives.

MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL: Our team possesses extensive
expertise in supporting a diverse range of mixed-use residential projects throughout the Bay Area. With a proven track record, we have successfully prepared CEQA documentation for high-rise developments in San Francisco, skillfully navigating the unique challenges of vertical growth. In the realm of Mixed-Use developments, Stantec excels in striking the delicate balance of diverse land uses, managing infrastructure challenges associated with higher density, and carefully addressing both direct and indirect impacts on adjacent properties to foster successful placemaking.

With a wealth of experience, our multidisciplinary team collaborates to create vibrant environments that seamlessly blend residential, commercial, retail, and recreational elements.

Moreover, our experience extends to mixed-use developments in Santa Rosa, where we artfully balance the need for new housing with historic preservation. These projects harmoniously blend residential, commercial, and recreational spaces, enhancing the city's urban fabric and creating a sense of place. Our proficiency in preparing complex CEQA documents includes instances where we must expand infrastructure to accommodate increased residential density within existing communities. We diligently plan utilities, transportation networks, and critical infrastructure to sustain growth without compromising community livability. Lastly, we guide our clients through the CEQA and Planning process, ensuring impactful disclosure of project impacts while fostering a sense of community identity through thoughtful planning and social interaction. With an unwavering commitment to Post War Era Homes, First St., Napa, CA
McKinstry St. and First St., Napa, CA
ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 6

excellence, we create residential developments that enrich the lives of residents and contribute positively to the communities they serve.

At Stantec, we are committed to contributing our collective knowledge and expertise to the success of projects like the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project. With our dedicated team, extensive experience, and proven track record, we look forward to creating lasting positive impacts on the environment, the community, and the future of responsible development.

2344 Old Sonoma Road Mixed Use Project,
Planning Services, Napa
Working with the City of Napa, Stantec reviewed and revised an applicant provided CEQA Evaluation under Section 15183, using Appendix M, and Appendix N offered under the CEQA streamlining infill provisions of SB 226. The project included 162 mixed-income for-sale residential units and approximately 9,575 square feet of nonresidential space for commercial and community serving uses.

Working side by side with the City, Stantec reviewed and revised a series of technical evaluations in-house to support the CEQA package that included, air, noise, and historical resources components.

Why this experience is relevant to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project: Bay Area Project; Downtown Mixed- Use Redevelopment; Historic District Evaluations; Adjacent Sensitive Uses; Alterations of Visual Character; Transition of Uses.

Client Contact: Ricky Caperton, AICP, Planning Manager, City of Napa, Community Development Department, 1600 1st Street, Napa, CA 94559; Phone: 707.257.9604; Email: [email protected]

Northern Waterfront Mixed-Use
Development Project, Planning Services,
Vallejo
In 2007, The City of Vallejo adopted a Planned
Development Master Plan and Design Guidelines
for the three Districts of their Waterfront: North,
Central and South. The Plan and Guidelines call for
attractive, mixed-use, people-oriented development
including public open spaces. As an extension of
City staff, Stantec is processed entitlements and
supplemental environmental review for
development of the North Waterfront project,
working closely with both Economic Development and Planning Divisions. The project include d 175 residential units, 25,000 square feet of retail, and over 7 acres of a promenade and wetland park areas. Parking and commercial uses, while preserving and enhancing public use areas are incorporated into the area(s) immediately adjacent to the existing Marina and walking paths along the Napa River. The project’s entitlements relied on tiered environmental analysis from the previously certified 2005 EIR prepared by the city’s Redevelopment Agency.

Challenges unique to the project include Sea Level Rise, Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) Permitting, Aquatic Habitat Analysis, Hazardous Materials Management, and Vehicle Miles Traveled.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 7

Why this experience is relevant to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project: Bay Area Project; Waterfront Project; Downtown Mixed-Use Redevelopment; Historic District Evaluations; Hotel/Destination Uses; Sea Level Rise; Adjacent Sensitive Uses; Alterations of Visual Character; Transition of Uses.

Client Contact: Gillian Hayes, Assistant City Manager, City of Vallejo, City Manager’s Office, 555 Santa Clara Street, Vallejo, CA 94590; Phone: 707.648.4163; Email: [email protected]

Sacramento Waterfront Redevelopment
Project, Environmental and Urban Planning
Services, Sacramento
Located at the historic starting point of the
transcontinental rail heading east, our project focuses on revitalizing a 2.5-acre nationally recognized historic district along the waterfront and train depot area in
Sacramento. The aim of this ambitious revitalization
effort is to attract a diverse mix of people and offer a wide range of activities along Sacramento’s
waterfront.

As the driving force behind this transformation,
Stantec is providing comprehensive services including architecture, building engineering, landscape design, civil engineering, and environmental expertise. Our responsibilities encompass client coordination, preparation of exhibits for grants, master plan design, construction document assistance, opinion of probable construction costs, specifications, and construction administration. Collaborating closely with the city, State Railroad Hist ory Museum, utility providers, business stakeholders, and our in-house team of engineers, architects, landscape architects, interior designers, and environmental resource specialists, we are working hand-in-hand to bring a visionary concept to life across approximately seven acres of the District.

The project's central design features include market and assembly buildings, outdoor dining areas, play spaces, a signature water feature, an LED monument, and ample outdoor event venue space. To foster community engagement and enjoyment, we have also emphasized preserving the mature urban forest and developing various amenities in the park. These amenities consist of wayfinding and interpretive signage, multi -use plazas for gatherings, sport courts, movie nights, pop-up festivals, and food trucks. Furthermore, the plan incorporates drinking fountains, shade structures, bike paths, public restrooms, adventure playgrounds, pathway additions, parking lot renovations, architectural lighting, and pathway/trail lighting improvements.

Throughout the process, Stantec has navigated unique challenges, including ensuring compliance with Section 106 regulations concerning non-historic period recreation structures, as well as the NEPA process. Additionally, we have been advising the design team on the 404 B 1 Alternatives process for project formation.

An essential aspect of our work involved developing the CEQA and NEPA documentation, which seamlessly integrates with the City of Sacramento's downtown specific plan. We also crafted an addendum that comprehensively covers all unique project components under the City's Specific Plan EIR.

As the project progresses, our team remains committed to creating an inviting, vibrant, and dynamic space that will enhance the Sacramento waterfront experience and become a cherished destination for people of all backgrounds and interests. We are currently guiding the project through the schematic design and permitting/approvals process, ensuring its successful realization.

Why this experience is relevant to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project: Waterfront Project; Downtown Mixed-Use Redevelopment; Historic District Evaluations; Hotel/Destination Uses; Sea Level Rise; Adjacent Sensitive Uses; Alterations of Visual Character; Transition of Uses.

Client Contact: Ellen Sullivan, Project Manager, City of Sacramento, City Managers Office of Innovation and Economic Development,915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814; Phone: 916-808-5758; Email:
[email protected] t

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 8

Seaport San Diego Waterfront
Development Project, Environmental and
Urban Planning Services, San Diego
The Port of San Diego awarded Protea Waterfront
Development the highly anticipated redevelopment
of 70-acres of premier waterfront located between
Downtown San Diego and the San Diego Bayfront.

Built over the next decade, the project will include a
480-foot observation tower; partially underground
aquarium; three hotels; shops and restaurants; 30-
acres of new parkland; beaches and promenades;
and upgraded facilities for commercial fishing fleets and pleasure craft. Seaport San Diego will be an interactive, diverse district offering recreational, commercial, cultural and educational attractions with vital, ongoing programs and activities while incorporating the rich aquatic heritage of the region.

Stantec is supporting multiple facets of the project but is the lead Urban and Environmental Planning firm working side by side with CRTKL the lead architect to help facilitate the development of project and its adherence to the Environmental Leadership Development Project (ELDP) certification under SB 7 a unique CEQA streamlining mechanism. Considerations related to the redevelopment of the area include: Sea Level Rise, Coastal Commission Permitting, Species and Habitat Conservation, Historic Resource Management, Historic Structure Demolitions, Commercial Fishing Operations, Seismic and Fault Analyses, Greenhouse Gases, and Vehicle Miles Traveled.

Client Contact: Alex Buggy, Gafcon Development, 5960 Cornerstone Court West, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121; Phone: 203.940-0880; Email: [email protected]

Confidential Technology Client, Moffett Federal
Airfield, Sunnyvale
Stantec is leading the Master Planning, Design, Engineering, Architecture, and CEQA/NEPA compliance under a
Programmatic EIR/EIS for buildout of Moffett Federal Airfield.

With over 15 individual projects running concurrently, our comprehensive approach to deliver over 25 different services disciplines across a team of 150 professionals, Stantec is proud to be working on one of the Bay Area’s most active military base development sites. One project to note that is significant is the demolition of the largest historic structure on the west coast and the development of commercial,
residential, and industrial uses. Stantec is currenting preparing a new stand-alone EA and in accordance with NEPA, as amended (42 United States Code 4321-4347), and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1500-1508). Key issues associated with the project include the demolition of historic structures and Section 106 compliance, transportation planning and design, visual resource impacts and compliance, and special-status species impacts.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 9

Why this experience is relevant to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project: Bay Area Project; Waterfront Project; Downtown Mixed-Use Redevelopment; Historic District Evaluations; Sea Level Rise; Adjacent Sensitive Uses; Alterations of Visual Character; Transition of Uses.

Client Contact: Katie O’Brien, Senior Director, Confidential Technology Company, Google MP5, 1160 N Mathilda Ave, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Phone: 415.994.5903; Email: [email protected]

Mare Island Redevelopment,
Environmental and Urban Planning Services,
Vallejo
The City of Vallejo and the Nimitz Group/Mare
Island Company are undertaking the
infrastructure and vertical development of up to

1.2 million square feet of manufacturing, office,
retail and residential space on Mare Island to
stimulate development under the currently
approved Mare Island Specific Plan. Stantec is
working as an extension of City staff to help lead
the entitlement and planning efforts associated with the planning actions. Stantec identified a single point of contact supported by technical specialists with expertise in base reuse planning, brownfield development and remediation, CEQA and NEPA documentation, wildlife and resource permitting, historic preservation, and transportation planning. Unique considerations related to the redevelopment of the island include Sea Level Rise, BCDC Permitting, Species and Habitat Conservation, Historic Resource Management, Historic Structure Demolitions, and Hazardous Materials Management.

Client Contact: Gillian Hayes, Assistant City Manager, City of Vallejo, City Manager’s Office, 555 Santa Clara Street, Vallejo, CA 94590; Phone: 707.648.4163; Email: [email protected]

Caritas Village, Affordable
Housing and Social Services
Rehab Project, EIR and EA, Santa
Rosa
Stantec worked with the City of Santa
Rosa to prepare an EIR and U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD) EA for the Caritas Village
Project. Stantec assisted the City of Santa Rosa with
CEQA compliance for a comprehensive homeless
services and emergency housing shelter and affordable
housing project.

The Caritas Village Project involves the construction of just over a full city-block of development that includes a comprehensive family and homeless support services facility. Stantec prepared air quality, cultural resources analysis including salvage reports, public report documentation, incorporation of interpretativ e materials, and compatible design to address the significant and unavoidable impacts to two historic-eligible listing properties.

Overall, Stantec prepared a comprehensive EIR that addressed concerns regarding consistency with the St. Rose Historic District, existing city plans for pedestrian linkages, and the Downtown Station Specific Plan. The EIR ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 10

approval process underwent over twelve hours of public hearings through the City of Santa Rosa Planning Commission and City Council. Stantec’s team effectively presented the analysis and responded to all comments on the EIR. Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations were adopted; no legal challenges were filed .

The EIR received unanimous approval.

Client Contact: Kristinae Toomians, Senior Planner, City of Santa Rosa, Planning & Economic Development, 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 3, Santa Rosa, CA 95404; Phone: 707.543.4692; Email: [email protected]

3575 Mendocino Avenue
Project, SCEA and EA, Santa Rosa
Working with the City of Santa Rosa
and Burbank Housing, Stantec
prepared an SCEA and HUD EA for the
redevelopment of an approximately 13.3-acre infill site, that was taken by the devastating Tubbs Fire in 2017,
into a compact, sustainable, transit-oriented, master
planned transit village community with up to 532 high-
density multi-family housing units consisting of 162 units affordable for low and very low senior households and up to 370 market rate housing units. The senior aff ordable housing component will include construction of three separate four-story buildings totaling 136,185 gsf on 2.5- acres of the project site. The market rate housing component will include the construction of approximately eight separate three- or four-story buildings totaling 510,531 gsf on 9 acres of the project site. The project will also include 1-acre of shared open space and the construction of a new public street (0.8-acre), on-and off-site utility infrastructure, parking (including surface, covered, and an aboveground garage), driveways, frontage improvements, landscaping, and a new stormwater outfall into the adjacent, off-site Russell Creek. Stantec prepared the following technical studies in-house to support the CEQA/NEPA analysis: air quality/health risk assessment and greenhouse gas analysis; biological resources technical report; wetland delineation; 404, 401, 1600 permits; section 106 report; and noise assessment.

Why this experience is relevant to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project: Bay Area Project; Waterfront Project; Downtown Mixed-Use Redevelopment; Historic District Evaluations; Adjacent Sensitive Uses; Alterations of Visual Character; Transition of Uses.

Midway Village
Redevelopment Project, SCEA
and EA, Daly City
Stantec assisted the City of Daly City
with CEQA and NEPA compliance for
the Midway Village Redevelopment Project on
approximately 11 acres. The project is San Mateo’s
largest affordable housing project to date and is funded by HUD. The existing affordable housing residential
development on the site will be demolished. The new
ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 11

development will consist of a community center; a childcare center and play area; seven residential buildings (three-, four-, and five-stories) with courtyards providing 566 housing units; a revised street system; underground and surface parking for 791 vehicles; landscaping and new open spaces including a community garden; and improvements to the 3.2-acre city park. Stantec prepared the following technical studies in-house to support the CEQA/NEPA analysis: biological resources, air quality, GHG, HRA, cultural and historic resources, and noise assessment.

Client Contact: Michael Van Lonkhuysen, Planning Manager, City of Daly City, Planning Division, 333 90th Street, Daly City, CA 94015; Phone: 650.991.8033; Email: [email protected]

Aspire ERES Charter School
Project, 15183.3 Infill Exemption and
CEQA Compliance Strategy, Oakland
Working with the City of Oakland, Stantec
developed a CEQA exemption package
compliance strategy for a 600-student, 49,000-square-foot public charter school infill project. The project is located on a brownfield site, and the team used CEQA Guideline
Section 15183.3, Appendix M, and Appendix N offered
under the CEQA streamlining infill provisions of SB 226.

The project was identified as a transit priority project (TPP) as it is located within a priority development area (Fruitvale and Diamond areas) as defined by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) in the Plan Bay Area 2040. Stantec used the prior CEQA analysis provided in the City of Oakland’s program EIRs, including the 1998 General Plan Land Use and Transportation Element and the 2003 Central City East Redevelopment Plan EIR, including the City of Oakland’s Standard Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures identified therein, as well as the 2013 Plan Bay Area EIR to address the project -specific environmental impacts of the project.

Working side by side with the City, Stantec prepared a series of technical studies in-house to support the CEQA exemption documentation package that included traffic (both Level of Service and vehicle miles travele d analysis), air, noise, and historical resources components. As part of the traffic analysis, Stantec calculated the project VMT with the implementation of transportation demand management measures. Stantec worked with the City of Oakland to identify an exemption method for the project to ensure the project would not result in significant impacts. This ensured both the developer and the City of Oakland a defensible and fully compliant CEQA strategy.

Client Contact: Heather Klein, Planner III, Oakland City Planning, 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, CA 94612; Pone: 510.238.3659; Email: [email protected]

Beyond the projects highlighted above, Attachment A to this proposal includes a matrix listing all key team members and their involvement on dozens of additional projects similar to the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 12

D. Proposed Scopes of Services
Project Understanding
The City of Napa is considering a proposal for the
redevelopment of approximately 6.7 acres located on the south side of First Street and Water Street and bounded by Napa River to the east and to the south. The Project is comprised of five parcels identified as assessor’s parcel numbers (APNs): 003-242-001, -004, -005, -006, -007, and -008. The Project proposes the construction of 130
residential units, 170 hotel rooms, 362 parking spaces, a trail along the river’s edge, and associated landscaping and pedestrian features. In addition, the Project proposed approximately 156,580 square feet (hotel and commercial) of non-residential space for visitor and community-serving uses, such as retail, food and beverage, and outdoor event space. The proposed maximum height of the structures
would be 75 feet. The Project site is also located along the Napa River within an existing floodplain and the Applicant will likely provide a flood solution through fill.

We Hear the Napa Community
The South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project will transform the Napa waterfront. Understanding the Project will be welcomed by some members of the Napa community and rejected by others, Stantec attended the Project’s Pre - Application Presentation to the Napa Planning Commission on June 15, 2023 to better understand the public’ perspective on the Project. Public comments during the June 15, 2023 meeting were focused on the following topics:
• Shared parking / subterranean parking
• Draft Demand Management Program
• Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety
• Integration of pedestrian facilities with
existing community.
• Waterfront access.
• Oxbow District vs. Downtown
• Interaction with / impacts to Napa River
Flood Control Project
• Potential Impacts to Alta Heights
neighborhood
• Affordable Housing and Density Bonus Law
• City Art Program
• Total Hotel rooms within the surrounding
community area.
• Trucking Routes- Construction Activities
• Density identified in Napa’s General Plan
• Zero net energy and Green Buildings
• Community request for EIR
CEQA Approaches Evaluated
In preparation of this proposal, we reviewed various CEQA approaches to determine the recommended CEQA approach for the Project, including:
15183 - Projects Consistent with a Community Plan or Zoning: California PRC Section 21083.3, and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, mandates that projects which are consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. This approach streamlines the review of such projects and reduces the need to prepare repetitive environmental studies. In order for a project to qualify for streamlining under Section 15183, the project must be consistent with one of the following: (1) a community plan adopted as part of a general plan [Napa Downtown Specific Plan; the Project conforms], (2) a zoning action which zoned or designated the parcel on which the project would be located to accommodate a particular density of development [the Project conforms with current zoning of Oxbow South Oxbow Conceptual Rendering, Napa, CA
ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 13

Commercial (OBC)], or (3) a general plan of a local agency [2040 Napa General Plan; the Project conforms], and the project must also be consistent with an EIR which was certified by the lead agency for the zoning action, the community plan, or the general plan [the Project conforms]. If significant impacts could occur, previous mitigation measures or uniformly applicable development policies or standards will be identified to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. If potential impacts cannot be reduced, preparation of an SCEA should be considered.

As such, the Project is eligible for streamlining under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183; however, it is advised that the City use 15183.3 per the discussion below. This approach gives limited flexibility related to mitigation and project specific impacts.
15183.3 Infill Exemption: The Project site is located in a Priority Development Area as identified by Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) (Downtown Napa and Soscol Gateway Corridor) within 0.2 - mile of the Soscol Gateway Transit Center, a major transit stop. Based on research and review of the frequency intervals as of July 2023, the Soscol Gateway Transit Center is a major transit stop that contains “the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during peak commute periods.” As such, the Project qualifies as a Transportation Priority Project (TPP). SB 226 Streamlining applies to TPP residential, retail, and office uses per Public Resources Code [PRC] Section 21094.5; CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.3 and promotes infill development by: (1) providing flexibility in project design by basing eligibility largely on environmental performance rather than prescribed project characteristics; and (2) avoiding repetitive environmental review where effects have already been analyzed at a programmatic level. In response to SB 226, new Guidelines Section 15183.3 was developed, requiring that a project, in order to be eligible for streamlined review, must meet certain criteria including being located in an urban area on a previously developed site or surrounded by at least 75 percent urban uses [the Project conforms], satisfying performance standards in CEQA Guidelines Appendix M [the Project conforms], and being consistent with applicable policies such as a Sustainable Communities Strategy [Plan Bay Area 2050; the Project conforms].

In addition to these requirements, the project must incorporate renewable energy components, promote transit or active transportation, be consistent with a plan for land uses surrounding transit stations within 0.5 miles of the project, and, in certain cases, undertake soil and water remediation.

Based on initial review of the Project information provided in the City's RFP, Stantec will evaluate whether the Project is qualified for an infill exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.3. The evaluation will assess potential impacts on resource areas covered under CEQA following the Appendix M performance standards and the Environmental Checklist in Appendix N. The analysis will also consider the City's 2040 General Plan and its accompanying certified EIR and the Napa Downtown Specific Plan and its accompanying EIR to determine if project-specific impacts were adequately addressed. If significant impacts could occur, previous mitigation measures or uniformly applicable development policies or standards will be identified to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. If potential impacts cannot be reduced, preparation of an SCEA should be considered.

As such, the Project is eligible for the 15183.3 Infill Exemption and is preferred over the conventional 15183 approach, but gives limited flexibility related to mitigation and project specific impacts.

Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) under SB 375: In order for a TPP or a Residential Project to be eligible for any of the SB 375 CEQA provisions, it must be consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in either a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy PRC Section 21155(a) and 21159.28). The Project site is located in a Priority Development Area as identified by ABAG (Downtown Napa and Soscol Gateway Corridor]) within 0.2-mile of the Soscol Gateway Transit Center, a major transit stop. Based on research and review of the frequency intervals as of July 2023, the Soscol Gateway Transit Center is a major transit stop that contains “the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during peak commute periods.” Additionally, the density of the Project qualifies it as a TPP as defined by PRC Section 21155(b)―the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 14

proposes a density of 26 units per acre, while the minimum density required to qualify for a TPP project is 20 units per acre.

As such, the Project qualifies for a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) under SB 375. An SCEA may be used for analysis of TPPs that have incorporated all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in prior applicable environmental impact reports (EIRs) (in this case, Plan Bay Area 2050 EIR, the Napa 2040 General Plan EIR, and the Napa Downtown Specific Plan EIR) (PRC Section 21155.2).

In accordance with the statue, residential projects with a total square footage of at least 50 percent residential uses (the Project site plans indicate that over 50 percent of the proposed uses would be residential) and TPPs can use the provisions in PRC Section 21159.28. Documents developed pursuant to PRC Section 21159.28 are NOT required to reference, describe, or discuss the following:
• Growth inducing impacts,
• Project specific or cumulative impacts from cars and light trucks on Global Warming or the Regional Transportation Network, and
• Cumulative effects identified and mitigated for in previous applicable EIR's shall NOT be treated as cumulatively considerable for the project.

As such Stantec will evaluate whether the Project is “qualified” as a TPP consistent with SCEA Criteria under PRC Section 21155 and 21155.2; including: Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Consistency, Land Use, Density, Proximity to Transit, and Mitigation Incorporation.

The SCEA will evaluate the potential Project impacts on the resource areas covered under CEQA following the Environmental Checklist, Appendix G of the 2022 CEQA Guidelines.

As such, the Project is eligible for CEQA provisions under SB 375 and qualifies for an SCEA. This document has the same level of legal defeasibility as an EIR, substantial evidence, with significantly less time and cost. This approach gives the maximum flexibility related to mitigation and project specific impacts.

Focused EIR. Napa City Council recently recognized the Soscol Gateway Transit Center as a major transit stop, as defined by PRC Section 21155, thereby qualifying the Project as a TPP and for CEQA streamlining per the provisions of SB 226 and SB 375. However, should preparation of the CEQA document identify a significant unavoidable impact, as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126, or should City staff direct the preparation of an EIR, Stantec would prepare an EIR for the Project pursuant to PRC Section 21083; CEQA Guidelines Sections 15120 – 15132.

Stantec would review and rely on prior planning and environmental documents (e.g., the Napa 2040 General Plan EIR, the Napa Downtown Specific Plan EIR, the 1997 American Center for the Wine, Food, and Arts Project EIR, and the 1998 Floodwall Environmental Impact Statement [EIS]/EIR) to screen out Project-level and cumulative analyses as much as possible. An Initial Study will be prepared to provide for a thorough disclosure of potential environmental impacts, and a focused environmental impact report (EIR) will follow only for those resource topics for which a significant and unavoidable impact or over which considerable controversy may arise.

Based on a review of the Project and our knowledge of the Project setting, we anticipate the more significant potential environmental issues associated with development of the Project would include aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, and tribal cultural resources impacts. Prior to initiating work on the EIR, Stantec will prepare an Initial Study to scope the EIR so that it is limited only to those resource considerations that need to be evaluated in detail (likely to be ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 15

aesthetics, air quality, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, and tribal cultural resources, based on the assumptions in this scope of work). Given the existing long-term operations on the site, the EIR will need to provide a detailed description of the baseline setting from which to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with both construction and long-term operations of the Project.

As such, the Project is eligible for a Focused EIR. This document has the advantage of the substantial evidence standard. This approach gives the maximum flexibility related to mitigation and project specific impacts.

Scopes of Work
Upon review of various CEQA approaches, Stantec believes preparation of an SCEA is the appropriate CEQA approach and documentation for the Project We recommend an SCEA be prepared for the Project as this allows a streamlined review process for residential infill development projects and projects within 0.5-mile of a major transit stop. The SCEA will provide greater flexibility related to mitigation as Project-specific mitigation measures may be included.

A standalone SCEA Scope of Work reflecting the Draft Scope of Services outlined in the RFP is included as Attachment B to this proposal.

A detailed cost tables and schedule are included in Attachment A. A summary of costs and schedules are also summarized in Section F. Cost Estimate and Timeline, of this proposal.

Quality Management and Consistency
Stantec has experience preparing multiple projects within geographic proximity to one another and we have learned through that experience that quality management and consistency is key to project document defensibility. To that end, Stantec has a formal quality management system in use across the organization that is registered to the ISO 9001:2008 Quality management standard. This internationally recognized standard for quality management reduces project risk, while providing support for regulatory compliance, promoting reliability, improving productivity and the efficiency of our services, and increasing client confidence. Our Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan will be built into the CEQA document’s technical, schedule, and budget needs to ensure that quality is built in at the beginning and verified as the Project progresses. What this means for the City is that when you receive a submittal from Stantec, City staff will be able to focus on content and context versus quality issues (typos, grammar, etc.) requiring re -work and revisions.

E. Staffing
Approach to Project Management
Our management approach is informed by many factors, including our experienced-based understanding of the City’s organizational structure, policies, and procedures for implementing CEQA and expectations regarding internal and external communications and overall performance. Our approach:

1. Supports the role of the City as the CEQA lead agency.

2. Clearly assigns overall project leadership responsibilities to the respective project manager.

3. Facilitates frequent and orderly communication between the City, the Stantec project team , the public, and trustee and responsible agencies.

4. Commits key personnel and senior staff to specific tasks for the duration of the performance period.

5. Coordinates the multi-disciplinary resources of the Stantec team to deliver high-quality work products that anticipate and respond to the City’s needs.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 16

6. Implements quality control measures before work products are submitted to the City.

7. Tracks and reports project cost and completion status to the City and to project personnel.

Responsible Personnel
For the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project, Stantec offers a team that provides expertise across the complete suite of disciplines required to address the full range of environmental concerns that are likely to arise. The selection of our in-house team members was based on four key factors:

1. Technical expertise in issue areas of concern to the City;

2. Prior experience with similar projects with similar scope, locale, and issues;

3. Availability during the performance period and ability to anticipate and accommodate changes in schedules for delivering milestone work products; and

4. A demonstrated ability to effectively communicate and present technical information to the public and to assist the City in coordinating with other participating agencies.

Organization Chart
Our organization chart on the next page shows how we approach client communication and project management, and the value we place on internal quality control. Our team is organized around our Principal in Charge, who is supported by our Project Manager and a technical team consisting of a cadre of tec hnical specialists. Beyond these key team members, we have more than 1,400 professionals in California. Under the direction of Trevor Macenski, there are a total of 300 environmental and planning staff supporting the western region. Stantec offers locally experienced resource leaders and a mix of junior, mid-level, and senior-level staff to maximize cost efficiencies, while providing necessary senior oversight to support successful Project completion.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 17

Project Team Profiles
We have assembled a team of key professionals, all with experience working on waterfront, mixed-use, and infill development projects in the Bay Area. Assigned staff will be committed to the Project through its completion. Brief descriptions of the Project management team and technical resources leads and their roles are provided in the following paragraphs. Resumes are provided in Attachment C and additional resumes can be provided upon request.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 18

TREVOR MACENSKI
Principal-in-Charge
Trevor is Stantec’s
Environmental and Planning
Practice leader in the western
united states. He has more
than 18 years of experience as an
environmental scientist with an advanced
understanding of land-use planning. As part of
our national impact assessment practice, he and
brings a creative, problem- solving approach to
his role as a liaison between the various
participants in the planning, permitting, and
project development process, including project
sponsors, engineers, attorneys, lead and
responsible agencies, and concerned
community groups. He is an experienced
environmental impact assessment practitioner, a
skilled public presenter, and an educator in the
environmental field. Trevor has worked on over
125 CEQA documents, including more than 30
EIRs that have been litigated, and has two
published CEQA court cases to his name
without a single document having been
overturned. Trevor is a City Council Member for
the City of Benicia and was previously on the
Planning Commission, and Historic Preservation
and Design Review Commission for the City of
Benicia. He understands the municipal planning
process and is sensitive to community concerns.

ANNA RADONICH
Project Manager
Anna manages Stantec project
teams, and she contributes
analytical work products
documenting CEQA compliance for agency
decisions related to urban development,
redevelopment, and infill projects. As an
experienced urban and environmental planner
with more than 20 years of professional
experience, she synthesizes, reformats, and
adapts knowledge generated by Stantec
investigations for the specific needs of cities’
planning and CEQA compliance efforts in
processing planning applications for mixed-use
developments, in-fill projects, and commercial
projects within the community. Anna has
experience in environmental compliance
strategies for land use and local development
projects in both the public and private sectors.

She has experience coordinating regulatory
review and compliance, including facilitating
public engagement, participating in regulator
proceedings, and tracking compliance
requirements. Anna is also a Planning
Commissioner for the City of Lafayette.

CHRISTINE ABRAHAM
ESQ.

QA/QC Manager
As an environmental
consultant with more than 18
years of experience in environmental review and
CEQA compliance documentation, Christine has
prepared and managed all levels of CEQA
documentation, from EIRs to EISs. In addition to
document preparation, Christine draws from her
legal background to provide a thorough peer
review of environmental documents to verify
defensibility, as well as engaging in litigation
support when needed.

KAITYN HECK
Air Quality, GHG, and Toxics
Kaitlyn has eight years of
experience as an Air Quality
and Greenhouse Gas
Technical Specialist. She has
worked on CEQA/NEPA project technical
reports for a variety of development and
infrastructure projects including residential and
commercial developments, utility projects,

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 19

transportation projects, and long-term planning
projects. Kaitlyn has been the lead technical
expert for projects in air districts across the state
including the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD), Bay Area Air
Quality Management District (BAAQMD), San
Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
(SJVAPCD), Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District (VCAPCD), and Monterey Bay
Air Resources Board (MBARB). She is
experienced with the California Emissions
Estimator Model (CalEEMod), AERMOD
dispersion modeling, EMFAC, and OFFROAD
programs.

MICHELLE TOVAR
Biological Resources &
Regulatory Compliance
Michelle is a principal
biologist with 20 years of
experience in permitting, regional conservation
planning, environmental compliance, sensitive
species and their habitats, and mitigation. She
has extensive experience in working with clients
and regulatory agencies on environmental
compliance documents and related permits. She
is a project manager and permit specialist that
assists clients with the state and federal
Environmental Species Acts, NEPA, and Clean
Water Act; she is also highly experienced in
negotiating avoidance, mitigation/
compensation, and enhancement agreements
with other agencies including USACE, FHWA,
Caltrans, RWQCB, and private developers. As a
former USFWS employee, she has developed
many working relationships with biologists,
technical leaders and regional chiefs throughout
the western regions.

ALISA REYNOLDS, RPA
Cultural Resources
Management
Alisa manages cultural
resources compliance
processes for local agencies,
development, and transportation projects. She
specializes in NEPA, National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP) and Section 106
compliance, mitigation implementation
procedures, Section 4(f), and project
management. Alisa meets the Secretary of the
Interior’s standards and guidelines for a
professional archaeologist, and her focus is on
strategizing best approaches to work with a
diverse range of clients, stakeholders, and tribes
to move the cultural resources process forward.

Alisa has more than 20 years’ experience as an
archaeological principal investigator for complex
archaeological projects, including managing field
crews, coordinating with construction managers,
and building consensus with Native American
tribes and individuals.

REBECCA RIGGS
Historic Resources
Rebecca leads Stantec
architectural history projects,
including managing and
participating in surveys of
historic resources and authoring technical
documents and reports for Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act, NEPA, and
CEQA compliance for a variety of cultural
resources projects. With six years of
professional experience as an architectural
historian, she has in-depth knowledge for
researching and evaluating historic buildings,
structures, and landscapes, as well as providing
guidance to clients and agencies on required
compliance for existing historic districts and
buildings. She has experience authoring and
coordinating with local, state, and federal
agencies for regulatory review and compliance,
as well as public outreach and working with
agencies and interested parties to complete
historic preservation measures. She has served
as lead architectural historian on several
complex projects that involve close consultation
with multiple agencies and involve the
development of not only technical reports, but
programmatic agreements and memorandums
of agreement and mitigation development and
implementation.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 20

NEIL DORAN
Hazardous Materials &
Remediation
Neil has 23 years of
experience as an
environmental professional.

His expertise includes environmental site
assessment, site investigation design and
implementation, geologic and hydrogeologic
characterization, remediation planning and
implementation, vapor intrusion evaluation,
human health risk assessment and
management, environmental compliance
monitoring for remediation projects, and
development and implementation of in-situ
bioremediation programs. He has extensive
experience with regulatory agencies at the local,
state, and federal level facilitating voluntary
investigation and remediation programs at urban
infill and brownfield projects in the San
Francisco Bay Area and across California,
including regionally significant and
transformative projects such as the Sacramento
Railyards.

KRISTIN POLLOT, AICP
Planning
Kristin is an urban planner with
extensive experience in
entitlements, planning policy
and a wide range of
environmental compliance work. She has spent
the bulk of her career (16+ years) working as a
city planner for local government (City of
Pittsburg), where as a division manager, she
oversaw the processing of hundreds of
discretionary entitlement applications and
dozens of CEQA documents for a wide variety of
projects. Kristin has direct experience managing
entitlements for large scale residential
subdivisions, new and expanded commercial
and industrial sites, green infrastructure projects,
urban infill, waterfront development and multi-
family projects. She also has directly managed
the preparation of multiple highly controversial
EIRs and NEPA documents.

TRACIE FERGUSON
Noise Analyses
Tracie has over 20 years of
experience as an acoustical
consultant on a wide range of
project types, including environmental noise
studies, government buildings, educational
facilities, commercial spaces, mixed-use
developments, and tenant improvements. She
brings expertise in environmental noise control,
CEQA documentation, mechanical noise and
vibration control, and architectural acoustics.

Tracie is skilled at providing design
recommendations and mitigation measures to
meet the requirements of applicable codes and
ordinances. Her deep technical knowledge,
experience with complex facilities, ability to
integrate with multiple team members and agility
in implementing innovative design solutions set
her apart.

DARYL ZERFASS, TE, PTP
Traffic & Transportation
Daryl has more than 28 years
of experience in multiple
aspects of traffic engineering
and transportation planning. He has a proven
record of managing large-scale traffic studies
efficiently and effectively. His projects include
freeway facility and interchange studies for
PSRs and PRs, traffic impact studies for large-
scale development projects, transportation
studies for Specific Plans and General Plan
updates, large-area transportation studies,
corridor studies, transportation nexus fee
studies, traffic model development, and land-use
related circulation studies. Daryl views every
project as an opportunity to develop innovative
transportation solutions and is committed to
expanding accessibility for all members of the
community.

JOSH HOHN, AICP
Visual Simulations &
Aesthetics
Josh is a visual resources
expert with experience in
environmental planning and
ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 21

permitting. With close to 20 years of experience
as a visual analyst, Josh has produced technical
reports and CEQA/NEPA documents, or their
equivalent, for dozens of infill residential and
mixed-use development projects, as well as
proposed power generation and transmission
projects. support of his work, he has testified
before the California Energy Commission and
West Virginia Public Service Commission. He
has also conducted visual assessments for a
variety of infrastructure projects, including roads,
water treatment plants, communications
facilities, and California High-Speed Rail. As
Stantec’s Visual Resources Practice Lead, Josh
has written or overseen visual impact analyses
for projects throughout California and across the
country.

F. Cost Estimate and Timeline
The standalone SCEA Scopes of Work reflecting the Draft Scope of Services outlined in the RFP is included as Attachment B to this proposal.

We have provided a time and materials cost estimate to prepare the SCEA Scope of Work attached to this proposal (Attachment B). The detailed cost estimate indicating expenditures for personnel resources and materials for each task identified in the scope of work is provided therein. The cost estimate has all tasks and sub- tasks listed, with billing rates, and total costs per task and sub-task. The cost summary is provided below and a detailed cost spreadsheet (including all tasks and sub-tasks listed, with billing rates, and total costs per task and sub-task) is provided as Attachment 2 to Attachment B. Additionally, Attachment B includes a preliminary work schedule for the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project, as duplicated below.

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 22

SCEA
Cost Estimate
We have provided a time and materials cost estimate to prepare the SCEA for the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project.

Task Budget
Task 1: Project Management, Kick-off & Regular Update Meetings $11,248 Task 2: Project Consistency Review and Mitigation Evaluation $8,522 Task 3: Project Description $10,910
Task 4: Technical Studies
Task 4-1: Air Quality and GHG Emissions Analysis $14,220 Task 4-2: Biological Resources Assessment $6,498
Task 4-3: Cultural Resources Assessment $14,368
Task 4-4: Noise Impact Assessment $5,256
Task 4-5: Transportation $7,302
Task 5: Administrative Draft SCEA $64,900
Task 6: Screencheck Draft SCEA and Public SCEA $21,304
Task 7: Response to Comments and MMRP $15,008
Task 8: Public Hearings $11,616
Labor Total $191,152
5% Contingency Budget $9,558
Direct Costs $2,658
Total Budget $203,368

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 23

Schedule
The following is the preliminary work schedule for preparation of an SCEA for the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project, assuming authorization is received by December 1, 2023. Stantec will work with the City on finalizing this schedule during the initial Project kick-off meeting.

Work Product / Milestone
Estimate
Completion
(Weeks)
Contract Awarded Week 1
Project Initiation Meeting; Receipt of Approved Project Plans, and all Technical Studies Prepared by the City’s/Applicant’s consultants Week 1
Stantec Submits Draft Project Description for City Review Week 2 City Review Draft Project Description Week 3
Stantec Prepares Administrative Draft SCEA and Technical Studies Week 4-8 City Reviews Administrative Draft SCEA and Technical Studies Weeks 9-11 Stantec Revises and Submits Screencheck Draft SCEA to City Week 12-13 City Reviews Screencheck Draft SCEA Week 14-15
Stantec Revises and Prepares Public SCEA for Submittal to City and State Clearinghouse Week 16 SCEA Distributed for Public Review Week 17
State Clearinghouse 30-Day Public Review Period Weeks 18-22 Stantec Prepares Responses to Comments and MMRP Weeks 23-24 Hearings TBD

ATTACHMENT 1

South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project I Stantec 24

G. Exceptions to Agreement
Stantec has reviewed your proposed Services Agreement and, should we be selected for this assignment, we will be able to conclude a mutually satisfactory contract with you. Stantec recently completed a project with the City utilizing the same Agreement and successfully came to a mutually satisfactory contract with the City, on that project.

ATTACHMENT 1

ATTACHMENT A

Project Experience Matrix

ATTACHMENT 1

DEMONSTRATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE + TEAM’S COLLABORATIVE EXPERIENCE - Denotes AEP Award Winning Project

PROJECTS

Bay Area
Project

Waterfront
Projects

Downtown
Mixed-Use
Redevelopment

Historic
District
Evaluations

Hotel/
Destination
Uses

Sea Level
Rise
Adaptation

Adjacent
Sensitive Uses

Alterations of
Visual
Character

Transition
of Uses Trevor M Anna R Christine A AQ/GHG BIO CUL/HST HAZ NOI TRANS VIS 2344 Old Sonoma Road, Napa, 15183 Peer-Review • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Northern Waterfront Mixed-Use, Vallejo, Entitlements, CEQA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Sacramento Waterfront, Sacramento, Addendum and EA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Seaport Village, San Diego, EIR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MFA Hangar 3 Demolition, NEPA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • MFA Eastside Airfield Improvement Project, NEPA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Former Mare Island Naval Base Environmental & Planning
Services • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Mare Island Connolly Corridor Mixed Use Project, CEQA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Caritas Village, Affordable Housing & Social Services
Rehab, Santa Rosa, EIR and EA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3575 Mendocino Avenue, Affordable
Housing, Santa Rosa, SCEA and EA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Midway Village, Affordable Housing, Daly City,
SCEA and EA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Aspire ERES, Charter School, Oakland, Exemption • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Vallejo Transit Center and Housing Complex Project,
Vallejo, ISMND • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Mowry Village Residential, Newark, EIR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1180 Main Street Office, Redwood
City, ISMND • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
East Main Street Redevelopment Project, Vacaville, ISMND • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Six Flags Theme Park Expansion Project, Vallejo, ISMND • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 469 Stevenson Street, San Francisco, EIR and Recirculated EIR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Brunswick, Senior Housing, Daly City, SCEA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1125 Arguello, Mixed-Use Office Affordable Housing,
Redwood City, EIR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • El Camino Real Mixed-Use Hotel and Residential,
Millbrae, SCEA • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • La Quinta Hotel Project, Vallejo, 15183 Package • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Home 2 Suites Hotel Project, Vacaville, ISMND • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Home 2 Suites Hotel Project, Antioch, ISMND • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Quintal Road Residential Development Project, Manteca,
EIR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
1 ATTACHMENT B

Scope of Work – SCEA

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
2 A. Scope of Work – SCEA
In order for a Transit Priority Project (TPP) or a Residential Project to be eligible for any of the California Senate Bill (SB) 375 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) provisions, it must be consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the Project area in either a sustainable communities strategy or an alternative planning strategy (Public Resource s Code [PRC] Section 21155(a) and 21159.28). The Project site is located in a Priority Development Area as identified by Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) (Downtown Napa and Soscol Gateway Corridor]) within 0.2-mile of the Soscol Gateway Transit Center, a major transit stop. The Soscol Gateway Transit Center is a major transit stop that contains “the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during peak commute periods.” Additionally, th e density of the Project qualifies it as a TPP as defined by PRC Section 21155(b)―the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project proposes a density of 26 units per acre, while the minimum density required to qualify for a TPP project is 20 units per acre.

As such, the Project qualifies for a Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) under SB 375. An SCEA may be used for analysis of TPPs that have incorporated all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in prior applicable environmental impact reports (EIRs) (in this case, Plan Bay Area 2050 EIR, the Napa 2040 General Plan EIR, and the Downtown Napa Specific Plan EIR( (PRC Section 21155.2).

The SCEA will evaluate the potential Project impacts on the resource areas covered under CEQA following the Environmental Checklist, Appendix G of the 2022 CEQA Guidelines.

If a significant impact could occur, specific mitigation measures would be required to bring any potential significant impact to a level that is less than significant. If a potential significant impact cannot be mitigated to a level of less than significant, preparation of an EIR should be considered. It is assumed that potential impacts can be reduced to a less-than-significant level, and the development of an EIR would not necessary; preparation of an EIR is therefore not included in this scope to prepare an SCEA .

Task 1: Project Management, Kick-off & Regular Update Meetings Upon the City’s review of our scope of work, Stantec’s Principal-in-Charge, Trevor Macenski, and Project Manager, Anna Radonich, will attend one 1-hour virtual meeting with City staff and the Applicant to explain the process, methodology, and approach to preparing an SCEA document.

Trevor and Anna will coordinate and attend one 2-hour kick-off in-person or virtual meeting with City staff and the Applicant to initiate the Project and review Stantec's scope of work and a description of the Project to be evaluated in the SCEA, including maps and graphics. To maximize efficiency, Stantec also proposes that the kick-off meeting agenda include, but not be limited to, the following action items:

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
3 • Introduce and establish lines of communication among project team members and identify roles and responsibilities.
• Identify, discuss, and revise, as necessary, the scope, methodology, content, approach, and schedule for completion.
• Review/refine the project objectives (CEQA).
• Discuss the schedule for providing information to Stantec for documents required for preparation of the SCEA.

Additionally, during the kick-off meeting, the Applicant team, City, and Stantec will discuss “baseline” and agree on the definition of baseline, for the Project CEQA analysis.

Within a week of the kick-off meeting, Stantec shall prepare and submit any revisions to the statement of work based on feedback from the City.

Once environmental review is underway, a bi-weekly Project check-in virtual meeting of up to one-hour would be scheduled with the City staff, Applicant, and the Project team to provide updates on the Project progress. Prior to each bi-weekly meeting, Stantec will provide an updated Microsoft Project schedule, agenda, and action items tracker. Stantec will prepare and distribute meeting minutes following all Project meetings Stantec prepares agendas for. In total, we have accounted for fourteen one-hour bi-weekly virtual meetings.

In addition, this scope includes one 2-hour virtual meeting for review of City comments to the Administrative Draft SCEA document.

This task also includes development and maintenance of the project schedule, and the internal coordination required to publish the necessary CEQA documentation and to prepare the “final” SCEA for adoption by the City. This task consists of those management activities that ensure Stantec’s ability to keep the Project running smoothly. As the liaison between Stantec staff, City staff, and Applicant, Stantec’s Principal-in-Charge, Trevor, will ensure that information is distributed appropriately, and that comments regarding Project-related issues are communicated effectively and efficiently.

Stantec will take notes during each meeting attended and distribute the draft notes to the meeting distribution list within three business days of each meeting.

Trevor and Anna will attend the following Project meetings:
• One 1-hour virtual meeting with City staff and the Applicant to explain the process, methodology, and approach to preparing an SCEA document.
• One 2-hour in-person or virtual kick-off meeting to initiate the Project. • Up to fourteen one-hour bi-weekly Project check-in virtual meetings. • One 2-hour virtual meeting for review of City comments to the Administrative Draft SCEA document.
• Trevor and Anna’s attendance at up to three public hearings is captured in Task 8, Public Hearings.

Deliverable
• Draft Meeting Notes for all meetings attended by Stantec (with exception of City Council Hearings as outlined in Task 8, Public Hearings): one electronic copy (MS Word or email and PDF as needed)
• Bi-weekly Updated Schedule using Microsoft Project: one electronic copy (PDF) • Meeting Agenda for all Project meetings attended by Stantec: one electronic copy (MS Word or email and PDF as needed)
ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
4 • Bi-weekly Updated Action Items Tracker: one electronic copy (MS Word or email and PDF as needed)
Task 2: Project Consistency Review and Mitigation Evaluation Under this task, Stantec will gather existing background data on the Project site using available sources such as information from the State Historic Preservation Office, Plan Bay Area 2050, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, and any information generated by the Applicant such as Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Arborist’s Report and Tree Survey, etc.

Stantec will develop the summary findings for the Plan Bay Area 2050 and conduct the mitigation applicability, identifying any mitigation measures that would apply to the Project.

Deliverable
• Draft Mitigation Evaluation: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed) Task 3: Project Description
Concurrent with Task 2, Project Consistency Review and Mitigation Evaluation, Stantec will initiate Project activities, working closely with City staff to ensure the development of a detailed Project Description in compliance with the City’s expectations. The Project description will include regional and local setting; the Project goals and objectives; and Project characteristics and important features and allow the public to provide input at public meetings and provide meaningful comments on the environmental consequences of the Project.

Deliverable
• Draft Project Description: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed) Task 4: Technical Studies
Stantec will prepare the below technical assessments in-house to support the SCEA analysis. The standalone Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas (GHG), and Energy Technical Study, Biological Resources Technical Memorandum, and Cultural Resources Technical Summary Report will each be included as appendices to the SCEA document, while the noise and transportation assessments will be wholly contained within the respective resource section with supporting documentation and modeling included as an appendix to the SCEA document. With exception to the in-house technical assessments listed below in Task 4, it is assumed that all other technical studies, site plans, and data, including, but not limited to the Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Phase I ESA, and water/sewer demand calculations, will be provided by the City and/or Applicant during the Project kick-off meeting. This scope of work does not include a Water Supply Assessment and assumes the Applicant will prepare one, if determined necessary, by the City. Additionally, Stantec’s scope does not include agency consultation or permits/permit fees obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Should permitting be required and not performed by the Applicant, Stantec can provide a supplemental scope of work and fee, upon request.

Task 4-1: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Stantec staff will prepare a standalone Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Technical Study in accordance with the provisions outlined in CEQA, and consistent with the requirements and methodologies recommended by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), the Napa 2040 General Plan, and SB 32 greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
5 Affected Environment, Regulatory Setting, and Background Information: This will include a discussion of the Project location and regional setting, summary of pertinent and general air quality requirements, GHG statutes and regulations, including the federal and California Clean Air Acts, California and National Ambient Air Quality Standards and applicable regional air quality and GHG plans and programs. This tasks also includes listing of the Project area attainment status with the ambient air quality standards and summarizing local air quality data (as available). All sensitive receptor sites in proximity to the Project will be identified. The background information will also include a discussion of the Project’s electricity provider and pertinent energy regulations.

Criteria Pollutant Estimation. The air quality analysis will include a discussion and evaluation of regional construction emissions and long-term operational emissions. Emissions associated with Project construction and net operation (proposed project emissions minus existing site emissions) will be evaluated using the current version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Pollutants to be assessed include the following: reactive organic gases (ROG), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). The construction and net operational emissions will be compared to BAAQMD project-level thresholds disclosed within the BAAQMD’s 2017 CEQA Guidelines to determine project significance.

Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Analysis. A qualitative assessment of CO hotspots will be provided consistent with BAAQMD CO screening analysis. If it is later determined that a quantitative assessment of CO is necessary, a budget augment will be requested.

Greenhouse Gas Analysis. The air quality modeling prepared for the criteria air pollutants will be used to generate emission estimates of GHGs in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MT CO2e).

Consistent with BAAQMD recommendations, construction and operational emissions will be disc losed within the analysis. In April 2022, the BAAQMD approved updated, qualitative GHG thresholds. These thresholds allow a project to determine significance based on an approved Climate Action Plan (CAP) or meet specific energy and transportation requirements. The City of Napa prepared a draft 2040 General Plan that was published in October 2022 and includes a Climate and Sustainability Element which states that the City is working with the County on a combined CAP. In the event that this CAP is prepared a nd approved prior to the time of analysis, then the CAP will be used to determine significance. However, if the CAP has not been finalized by the time of analysis, GHG significance will be determined based on the Project’s consistency with BAAQMD’s 2022 qualitative thresholds that would require vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions and all electric facilities. In addition, the Project will be compared to other applicable GHG reduction plans such as the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Scoping Plan.

Construction Health Risk Assessment. The Project site lies in an existing commercial area. Based on a review of Google Earth, there are single family residents located approximately 300 feet to the east and south of the project site boundary. To assess the impacts of construction-related diesel particulate matter (DPM) to nearby receptors, Stantec will prepare a quantitative health risk assessment (HRA) and will be included as an appendix to the Air Quality and GHG Technical Report. The HRA will be conduct ed in accordance with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the BAAQMD guidance to assess these impacts. The construction HRA will include the following:
• Estimation of TAC Emissions. The main source of TACs would be DPM emissions from construction equipment. DPM emissions will be obtained from the CalEEMod modeling. • Air Dispersion Modeling. Dispersion modeling will be prepared using the current version of AERMOD, a dispersion model approved by the USEPA and BAAQMD to calculate the concentration of DPM at nearby sensitive receptors.
• Risk Characterization. The inhalation risk will be estimated as the main exposure pathway from Project emissions is inhalation. The HRA will be calculated following the latest OEHHA and BAAQMD guidance.
• Findings and Discussions: The findings for cancer and non-cancer risks will be disclosed and compared to BAAQMD thresholds.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
6 Note: Due to the proximity of nearby receptors, it is assumed that construction emissions will need to be mitigated with Tier 4 off-road construction to reduce the health risk during construction.

Operational Health Risk Assessment. Based on the preliminary project description, the Project is not a source of substantial toxic air contaminants such as those associated with distribution and large warehouse centers that would result in a health risk impact to nearby sensitive receptors. A qualitative discussion of the health risk impacts posed to existing, off-site sensitive receptors will be sufficient.

However, the Project would place new residents that could be impacted by existing stationary and mobile sources of TACs. The analysis will include a review of BAAQMD health risk screening tools to evaluate the single stationary and cumulative risk posed to new receptors from stationary and mobile sources within 1,000 feet.

Energy Analysis. Project energy demands from petroleum fuel (gasoline and diesel), natural gas, and electricity during both construction and operation will be calculated based on the air quality modeling output files, CARB’s EMFAC2021, and EMFAC OFFROAD. The analysis will also include a discussion of the project’s consistency with energy reduction plans include California Green Building Standards and the City’s 2040 General Plan.

Emissions Reductions and Significance Findings. If deemed necessary, mitigation measures will be identified to reduce significant impacts related to air constituents and GHG emissions. Emissions reductions from these measures will be quantified. Sources of measures include, but are not limited to, the Office of the California Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures report. Significance findings will be provided for both pre- and post-mitigation conditions.

Assumptions
• Stantec will provide the City and Applicant with the modeling assumptions for review and comment prior to initiating the comprehensive modeling. The schedule clock will be paused during the review period and will begin upon receipt of acceptance. • CalEEMod will be used to estimate criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions. • If CalEEMod is updated and the update precipitates revised modeling a budget augment will be warranted.
• The criteria air pollutant/GHG modeling includes one round of comprehensive modeling and assumes modeling will be prepared for the existing site (to calculate the emissions that will be displaces) and the proposed Project. Based on the preliminary description of the project, this scope includes 12 hours of modeling. The scope assumes a single phase of construction. If the level of effort exceeds the estimated number of hours a budget augment may be requested. • A qualitative assessment of CO hotspots will be provided. If it is later determined that a quantitative assessment of CO is necessary, a budget augment will be requested. • The HRA assumes that construction will take place over a single phase. If construction is prepared in phases, a budget augment may be requested. If the construction phasing would place residents on the project site prior to completion of construction, an operational HRA to evaluate the risk posed to on-site receptors during remaining construction would be required and a budget augment may be requested.
• Major changes to the Project features, design, schedule or other parameters that precipitate revisions to the emissions modeling may also warrant a budget augment. • Changes to the Project that occur after completing the analysis that require re-modeling will be considered additional work that is not covered by this scope of work. • The Project is not considered a source of substantial odors. A qualitative assessment of odors will be provided, which documents the distance to any odor sources relative to the BAAQMD’s guidance.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
7 • Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Data Needs
The following data would assist in preparation of the analyses. If data is not available, Stantec will use default modeling assumptions and may propose timing and phasing assumptions for approval. • The timing of construction, the type and number of construction equipment anticipated, and the amount of import or export of soil during construction. • Sustainability project design features that would reduce GHG emissions (i.e., energy efficiency features beyond what is required by law, use of drought tolerant plants, water reduction features, waste reduction features, etc.).

Schedule
Stantec will provide the methodology and modeling assumptions to the City for review within two weeks of receipt of all information needed to complete the analysis. Upon approval of the methodology and assumptions, the air quality/greenhouse gas emissions assessment will be provided to the City within four weeks.

Deliverable
• Standalone Air Quality, GHG, and Energy Technical Study with modeling output files included as appendices, included as an appendix to the SCEA document. The results will be reflected in the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Energy sections of the SCEA. The Study will be submitted to the City in PDF as needed.

Task 4-2: Biological Resources Assessment
The Project site is substantially developed; however, sensitive habitats or special-status species may still be present. Based on desktop review, existing General Plan information, and the 1999 Floodwall EIS/EIR, Stantec will characterize habitat types present in the Project area and the potential for special-status plant or wildlife species to occur. Stantec will also refer to the City’s tree ordinance and Municipal Code, Chapter 12.44. Based on the results of the desktop review, Stantec will identify standard measures from the General Plan EIR as they apply to the Project. Stantec will document the desktop review in a Biological Resources Technical Memorandum.

Assumptions
• Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Deliverable
• The standalone Biological Resources Technical Memorandum will be provided as a n appendix to the SCEA document. The results will be reflected in the Biological Resources section of the SCEA document. The Memorandum will be submitted to the City in PDF as needed.

Task 4-3: Cultural Resources Assessment
Stantec will prepare a standalone Cultural Resources Technical Summary Report that will evaluate the Project’s impacts to Cultural Resources. As part of this effort, Stantec, will conduct the following: 1) Review of background information and conduct desktop review of built resources over 50 years in age, 2) conduct pedestrian survey for archaeology and built resources 3) summarize results into an appropriate short technical document format, including historic context, eligibility recommendations and potential impacts on built environment resources. This will include completion of DPR-523 forms for state-level documentation of all surveyed resources.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
8 Review of Background Information and Desktop Review. Stantec will review background information regarding archaeological resources for the area, including relevant project files; National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listings; state and local landmark listings; and known previously recorded archaeological sites within 0.25-mile of the Project area.

Stantec will also review relevant background information for the area and the built environment, including relevant project files; National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listings; state and local landmark listings; and known previously recorded resources in the Built Environment Resources Directory (BERD).

In-person research may also be completed at the Napa County Library and the Napa County Clerk- Recorder or Assessor.

Pedestrian Survey. Stantec will conduct a pedestrian survey of the proposed Project area.

Archaeological survey will be conducted by walking systematic transects spaced no greater than 15 meters apart over the entire area of potential effect (APE). Stantec will also complete a built environment pedestrian survey of the built environment in the proposed Project area. This survey will be conducted by driving or walking down Vernon Street and Water Street to document present built environment conditions.

Summary Technical Report. Stantec will summarize the results of the desktop review, built resources evaluation, pedestrian surveys, and tribal outreach in a summary technical memo.

Tribal Cultural Resources Review. As now required by AB 52, The tribal cultural resources section of the SCEA will analyze direct and indirect impacts to tribal cultural resources as a result of the Project.

Stantec staff will analyze impacts by utilizing the information gathered through the cultural and historical resources section desktop review and survey as well as the results of AB 52 consultations with local Tribes to assess impacts to tribal cultural resources. We assume that tribal cultural resources, if impacted, will be mitigated to a less than significant level. This scope of work assumes Stantec will work with the City to prepare and conduct all AB 52 outreach and consultation. Stantec will engage Native American tribes based on the City’s lists to ensure that they are invited to consultation regarding the Project.

Assumptions
AB 52:
• This scope of work assumes Stantec will work with the City will prepare and conduct all AB 52 outreach and consultation. Stantec will engage Native American tribes based on the City’s lists to ensure that they are invited to consultation regarding the Project. • Within 14 days of a decision to undertake the Project, Napa shall provide written notification to the tribes that requested placement on notice list.
• Notice to Tribes shall include brief Project Description, location, and Napa contact information. • Tribes have 30 days to request consultation.
• Napa shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a Tribe’s request for consultation.

Archaeological and Built Resources Pedestrian Survey:
• One archaeologist will survey in one 10-hour day.
• A 0.25-mile radius around the will be considered for the desktop review. • Assumes there are built environment resources within the Project area. Desktop review will consider built environment resources.

Built Environment Pedestrian Survey
• One architectural historian will survey and complete off-site research in one 10-hour day. • All potential built environment resources within a 0.25-mile radius will be considered for the desktop review and survey in areas directly adjacent as needed. • Assumes there will be 5 to 6 built environment resources surveyed and documented.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
9 Other
• Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Deliverable
• The standalone Cultural Resources Technical Summary Report, which will include built environment findings, will be provided as a confidential appendix to the SCEA document and will include completed California Department of Parks and Recreation DPR-523 Forms. The results will be reflected in the Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources sections of the SCEA.

The Report will be submitted to the City in PDF as needed.

Task 4-4: Noise Impact Assessment
Stantec will develop a noise study within the SCEA document that will evaluate the Project’s impacts from noise. Major noise sources in the Project area are related to roadways, such as First Street and Soscol Avenue, existing retail buildings, single family homes, and activities associated with these uses. Noise increases associated with traffic as well as construction, stationary sources such as HVAC equipment, general operational activities, and functions at the event barn associated with the Project, need to be evaluated. The Noise section of the SCEA document will be developed using the following steps:
• Stantec will assess the current ambient noise levels at the Project site using the noise contours contained in Figure 3.11-2 and Table 3.11-11 in the Napa 2040 General Plan EIR. • Using the published ambient noise levels, initial project information, and general site and exterior façade assumptions, establish initial recommendations to mitigate exterior noise to meet the standards for Land/Use Noise Compatibility in the Napa 2040 General Plan, California Building Code, and the California Green Buildings Standards Code (CalGreen). • Using the Project specific traffic count data provided by the traffic assessment and general industry standard practice, determine the potential effect the Project will have on local traffic counts and determine the impact to the neighboring community. Data will be evaluated for anticipated traffic noise during the construction of the Project and from operational traffic noise after the Project is functional.
• Quantify the fixed-source operational noise and event barn noise generated by the Project to determine potential noise impacts associated with the Project and will identify potential measures to address these impacts in accordance with Chapter 8.08 “Noise Control Regulations” in the City of Napa Municipal Code and the requirements in the City’s 2040 General Plan. • Stantec will use the Federal Highway Administration Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) to determine potential impacts to surrounding sensitive receptors from short term construction noise. Stantec will provide an assessment regarding project-related construction and its impact on existing noise sensitive receivers.
• Using the information contained in the Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Guidelines document, determine the potential groundborne vibration impact of the Project construction to nearby sensitive receivers.

Assumptions
• The noise analysis will be wholly contained within the Noise section of the SCEA. As such, Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Deliverable
• The noise impact assessment will be included within the Noise section of the SCEA, and all modeling results will be included an appendix to the SCEA document in PDF.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
10 Task 4-5: Transportation
Stantec will evaluate the Project’s impact on transportation, including an analysis of VMT. The analysis will address CEQA Guidelines regarding the analysis of transportation impacts where VMT is recognized as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impact. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has provided a Technical Advisory (December 2018) that recommends specific VMT significance thresholds that may constitute a significant transportation impact and lead agencies have the discretion to set or apply their own thresholds of significance. OPR recommends use of a per-capita measurement of VMT for CEQA analysis based on average VMT per resident for evaluation of residential development. The City of Napa has similarly adopted thresholds of significance consistent with the OPR recommendation. Certain types of development, such as development within a

0.5-mile of an existing major transit stop can generally be presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT.

The proposed Project would add new development that is less than a 0.5 mile walk from the Soscol Gateway Transit Center located on Burnell Street. The Project site is also located with a Priority Development Area as designated by the Napa County Transportation Authority, as well as within a Transit Priority Area as documented by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. The Soscol Gateway Transit Center is a hub for Vine Transit with bus arrivals every few minutes. Since the Soscol Gateway Transit Center qualifies as a major transit stop, the Project is expected to have a less than significant impact on VMT.

The transportation assessment will also address potential conflicts with current transportation planning programs (plans, ordinances, and policies), increased hazards due to the project geometric design features if applicable, and emergency access.

Deliverable
• The transportation assessment will be wholly contained within the Transportation section of the SCEA, and all relevant data and calculations will be an appendix to the SCEA document in PDF.

Task 5: Administrative Draft SCEA
Stantec will prepare the Administrative Draft SCEA under this task, which will include a description of the Project, supporting map(s) showing the Project site, a list of Project objectives, the probable environmental effects of the Project based on criteria contained in the Plan Bay Area 2050 EIR and the 2022 CEQA guidelines. Stantec will develop a SCEA that incorporates all feasible mitigation measures, performance standards, or criteria set forth in the Plan Bay Area 2050 EIR, the Napa 2040 General Plan EIR, and the Downtown Napa Specific Plan EIR) (PRC Section 21155.2) Stantec will also rely on information in the the 1997 American Center for the Wine, Food, and Arts Project EIR, and 1999 Napa River/Napa Creek Flood Reduction Project Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement[EIS]/EIR [1998 Floodwall EIS/EIR]) to supplement the analysis as needed.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
11 The SCEA will evaluate the potential Project impacts on the resource areas covered under CEQA following the Environmental Checklist, Appendix G of the 2022 CEQA Guidelines.

If a significant impact could occur, specific mitigation measures would be required to bring any potential significant impact to a level that is less than significant. If a potential significant impact cannot be mitigated to a level of less than significant, preparation of an EIR should be considered. It is assumed that potential impacts can be reduced to a less-than-significant level and the development of an EIR would not be necessary; preparation of an EIR is therefore not included in this scope to prepare an SCEA.

All text and graphics to be used in the SCEA will be included, in proposed final form, in the Administrative Draft SCEA document.

In addition to all legal requirements, the Administrative Draft SCEA will also include the following:
• A summary table that clearly describes all potential impacts, states whether or not the impact is significant, identifies potential mitigation measures, and indicates whether or not the impact remains significant upon implementation of the mitigation measures. • Maps, graphics, tables, and charts necessary to clearly depict the location and nature of any environmental constraints and potentially significant impacts identified in the SCEA, and present relevant information.
• An impact discussion that numerically identifies each impact, with each significant impact followed by appropriate mitigation measures. Whenever possible, equally effective alternative mitigation measures should be proposed. This will allow the City to select the mitigation measure determined to be most feasible and desirable at the time of Project approval.

Furthermore, the Administrative Draft SCEA document will also include a robust, separate, and specific section documenting and establishing the baseline conditions for the Project. The Project site is cur rently developed.

The SCEA will include the following sections:
• Introduction. This section will provide introductory information about the Project and the document organization. This section will also include the required findings indicating that the Project complies with the requirements of CEQA for using a SCEA pursuant to PRC Section 21155.2(b).
• Project Description. This section will include the Project Description. • Transit Priority Projects and the Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment.

This section will include a background discussion on SB 375 and an analysis of the Project’s consistency with the TPP Criteria and Plan Bay Area 2050. • Initial Study Checklist. This section will include the completed Initial Study Checklist showing the significance level under each environmental impact category. • Environmental Impact Analysis. This section will include an assessment and discussion of impacts associated with each subject area in the Initial Study Checklist. In making an impact determination, the analysis will assume implementation of applicable Project design features.

Where potentially significant effects are identified, mitigation measures will be provided to reduce such impacts to a less-than-significant level. Each checklist discussion will list applicable Project- level mitigation measures from the Plan Bay Area 2050 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) and demonstrate Project compliance.
• List of Preparers. This section will provide a list of City personnel, other governmental agency personnel, and consultant team members who participated in the preparation of the SCEA. • References, Acronyms, and Abbreviations. This section will provide a list of references, acronyms, and abbreviations used in the SCEA.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
12 • Appendices. The various technical reports and other documents used to support the SCEA will be provided on a file sharing site (FTP).

Our team will compile all sections of the SCEA document and will conduct thorough internal senior review by the Project Manager, QA/QC review, and editorial review to ensure an appropriate level of technical content, readability, and consistency prior to submittal to the City for review.

The Administrative Draft SCEA will be prepared for the City. Stantec will then use City comments on the Administrative Draft SCEA to develop the Screencheck Draft SCEA. While all resources will be analyzed in the SCEA, per CEQA Guidelines, the following discussions highlight the resource considerations that we anticipate being critical to the Project:

Aesthetics
This section of the SCEA will address the visual resources in the Project vicinity and the potential for visual impacts to occur as a result of implementing the Project. The Napa 2040 General Plan will be used to determine the local significance of the area’s visual character. While the Project site is formerly a developed project in an urban area, the Project will constitute a denser land use on the Project site, and thus could potentially affect the aesthetic character or quality of the existing visual environment. Stantec will use the Applicant’s elevations to evaluate the potential visual and aesthetic impacts from the Project.

While a formal aesthetics analysis is not required for an SCEA document, Stantec will include the section in the SCEA document for informational purposes.

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Stantec will prepare the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions sections of the SCEA using the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Technical Study outlined in Task 4-1, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Biological Resources
Stantec will prepare the Biological Resources section of the SCEA using the Biological Resources Technical Memorandum as outlined in Task 4-2, Biological Resources Assessment, and the 1999 Floodwall EIS/EIR.

Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources
Stantec will prepare the Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources sections of the SCEA using the Cultural Resources Technical Summary Report as outlined in Task 4-3 Cultural Resources Assessment. This scope of work assumes Stantec will work with the City to prepare and conduct all AB 52 outreach and consultation. Stantec will engage Native American tribes based on the City’s lists to ensure that they are invited to consultation regarding the Project.

Energy
Stantec will prepare the Energy section of the SCEA using the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Technical Study outlined in Task 4-1, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Stantec will prepare the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the SCEA using the Phase I ESA and any other information prepared by the Applicant’s consultant. Stantec will use the Phase I ESA to describe the known and potential sources of hazardous wastes in the Project vicinity (i.e., with 0.25 -mile of the Project site). Additionally, Stantec will review online databases from the Department of Toxic Substances Control, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and other regulatory agencies to determine the potential for encountering hazardous wastes within the Project area.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Stantec will analyze potential impacts on hydrology and water quality, including analysis of the stormwater system, potential flooding impacts, and potential impacts on the Napa River, when preparing ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
13 the Hydrology and Water Quality section of the SCEA. Stantec will reference the 1999 Floodwall EIS/EIR as needed.

Land Use and Planning / Population and Housing
Existing conditions will be reviewed by Stantec through resource-specific site visits, by determining site zoning, and examining local land use plans and policies to determine Project consistency. Existing surrounding land uses will be identified and described to determine land use compatibility and to identify potential conflicts that could occur during Project construction or operation. In evaluating land use issues, Stantec will consider the consistency/compliance of the Project with federal, state, regional, and local land use plans and regulations, as well as the Project’s compatibility with the existing and planned land uses in the vicinity.

Stantec will compare the Project’s impacts in population with the Napa 2040 General Plan and General Plan Housing Element to confirm that the Project’s impacts to population have been accounted for both at regional and local levels, and to determine if an appropriate jobs/housing balance will be maintained.

Noise
Stantec will prepare the Noise section of the SCEA as outlined in Task 4-4, Noise Impact Assessment.

Public Services
Stantec will use the most recent data available and contact relevant service providers to provide a description of existing Napa community services, including police and fire protection and schools. We will provide a description of potential impacts to existing conditions and services resulting from the construction and operation of the Project.

Transportation
Stantec will prepare the Transportation section of the SCEA as outlined in Task 4-5, Transportation. We will evaluate both onsite and adjacent circulation routes for both automobile, pedestrian, and bicyclists to make the requisite significance determinations in accordance with the CEQA guidelines. Stantec will assess the transportation impacts (i.e., traffic, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, and parking) associated with construction and operation of the Project. The Project site is located within 0.2-mile of the Soscol Gateway Transit Center, a major transit stop. Generally, projects within 0.5-mile of a major transit stop should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact.

Utilities and Service Systems
This section of the SCEA will address potential effects related to the availability and capacity of utilities and services. Utilities and services that will be addressed include sewer service, water service, and solid waste collection and disposal. This section will discuss whether any of these services or facilities is below adopted standards, or near or beyond their capacity to adequately serve the Project. Stantec will rely on stormwater, sewer, and water supply/capacity calculations provided by the Applicant. Particular attention will be given to water demands that will result from long-term operation of the Project.

Wildfire
The SCEA document will analyze the potential for wildfire inducement. Stantec will utilize any existing fire behavior modeling and City and County wide efforts but will make current references to existing fuel loads and wind behaviors. Additionally, Stantec will reference any State Wildfire Hazard Severity Zone designations.

A detailed analysis of impacts that could occur as a result of implementation of the Project will be conducted and presented for each element of the natural and built environment. Baseline conditions will be qualitatively and quantitatively described. The boundaries of the affected environment will be established by definable geographic units such as airshed, watershed, viewshed, and socio -political ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
14 boundaries. Impacts will be qualitatively and quantitatively assessed and described. Significance of impacts will be measured against criteria that have been established by regulation, accepted standards, or other definable criteria. Information sources will be cited.

Stantec will prepare and submit one electronic copy (MS Word) of the Administrative Draft SCEA (including appendices) to the City for review. It is assumed the City will provide one consolidated, reconciled set of comments on the Administrative Draft SCEA.

Deliverable
• Administrative Draft SCEA: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed).

Task 6: Screencheck Draft and Public SCEA
Screencheck Draft SCEA
Upon receipt of the City’s comments on the Administrative Draft SCEA, Stantec will make necessary revisions and prepare and submit one electronic copy (MS Word and built PDF) of the Screencheck Draft SCEA (including appendices) to the City for review. It is assumed the City’s comments on the Administrative Draft SCEA will be minimal and will not require new analysis or modeling.

Public SCEA
Stantec will prepare the Public SCEA by implementing the City’s comments on the Screencheck Draft SCEA. It is assumed that the City will provide a consolidated, reconciled set of comments on the Screencheck Draft SCEA (including appendices). It is assumed the City’s comments on the Scre encheck Draft SCEA will be minimal and will not require new analysis or modeling. The Public SCEA is the version of the document which will circulate around to the public, be posted on the City’s website, and sent to the State Clearinghouse.

Stantec understands that the City will be responsible for on-site notices and legal notices in the newspaper. Stantec will prepare the notices (including the Notice of Intent to Adopt [NOA] and Notice of Completion [NOC]) and the City will prepare the notice list and prepare and mail the citizen mailings. This task includes preparation of the associated mailings and newspaper notices electronic files for City printing, envelope stuffing, and distribution. Stantec will prepare the SCEA in a manner that is ready to be published for public review. Once the SCEA is deemed acceptable for public distribution, Stantec will upload the electronic copies to the State Clearinghouse CEQA portal in coordination with the City.

Stantec will provide an electronic copy to the City for distribution and web posting. Upon request, Stantec will provide the City with up to three bound hard copies (with appendices on thumb drive) of the SCEA document.

Administrative Record
Stantec will maintain the administrative record throughout preparation of the SCEA document. Stantec will submit an electronic copy of the administrative record, via file sharing site (FTP), to the City prior to publication (30-day public circulation) of the SCEA document.

Deliverable
• Screencheck Draft SCEA for City review: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF). • Public SCEA for public circulation, posting to City’s website, and SCH: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF)
• One electronic copy of the NOA (PDF)
• One electronic copy of the NOC (PDF)
ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
15 • State Clearinghouse Electronic Submittal (including SCEA, NOC, and SCH Project Summary Form)
• Upon request, Stantec will provide the City with up to three bound hard copies (with appendices on thumb drive) of the SCEA document.
• Administrative Record: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF) • Assumes all black and white printing (except colored graphics) and that each deliverable is no more than 500 printed pages.

Task 7: Response to Comments and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Response to Comments
Under this task, Stantec will work with the City to respond to all comments related to the environmental analysis and provide the City with responses for their Staff Report, if requested by the City, for up to 50 individual comments (not individual comment letters) received during public review of the SCEA. This task does not include the formal preparation of a response to comments document. To this end, Stantec will prepare written responses to comments received during the public review period and submit t hem for City staff review within 15 days of receipt of comments from the City. The responses to comments will be prepared based on the requirements of the State CEQA Statutes and Guidelines. We assume the City will receive all public comments and compile them for Stantec. Responses that are within this proposal’s scope of work and budget consist of explanation, elaboration, or clarification of the data contained in the publicly circulated SCEA, with a budgeted effort for technical staff to respond up to 50 individual comments.

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP)
Stantec will prepare an MMRP for the Project, meeting the requirements of PRC Section 21081.6. We will prepare an Administrative Draft MMRP for City review. Upon receipt of a single consolidated, reconciled set of comments on the Administrative Draft MMRP, Stantec will prepare the “final” MMRP, reflecting all City comments. The MMRP will include revising mitigation measures included in the Response to Comments.

Deliverable
• Responses to Comments for City Staff Report: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed)
• Administrative Draft MMRP: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed) • “final” MMRP: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF)
Task 8. Public Hearings
Stantec Principal-in-Charge, Trevor, and Project Manager, Anna, will both attend up to four 2-hour public hearings (in-person or virtual) for the Project. It is assumed that Stantec will prepare a slide-deck presentation and/or graphics of the Project to accompany the City’s Staff Report presentation. When meetings take place as a formal public hearing before the Planning Commission or City Council, the City will be responsible for the preparation of minutes and the keeping of records. Additional public hearings/meetings will be reimbursed at a cost of $2,500 per meeting for both Trevor and Anna to attend, with prior authorization by the City.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
16 B. Schedule
The following is the preliminary work schedule for the South Oxbow Mixed-Use Project, assuming authorization is received by December 1, 2023. Stantec will work with the City on finalizing this schedule during the initial project kick-off meeting.

Work Product / Milestone
Estimate
Completion
(Weeks)
Contract Awarded Week 1
Project Initiation Meeting; Receipt of Approved Project Plans, and all Technical Studies Prepared by the City’s/Applicant’s consultants Week 1 Stantec Submits Draft Project Description for City Review Week 2 City Review Draft Project Description Week 3
Stantec Prepares Administrative Draft SCEA and Technical Studies Week 4-8 City Reviews Administrative Draft SCEA and Technical Studies Weeks 9-11 Stantec Revises and Submits Screencheck Draft SCEA to City Week 12-13 City Reviews Screencheck Draft SCEA Week 14-15
Stantec Revises and Prepares Public SCEA for Submittal to City and State Clearinghouse Week 16
SCEA Distributed for Public Review Week 17
State Clearinghouse 30-Day Public Review Period Weeks 18-22 Stantec Prepares Responses to Comments and MMRP Weeks 23-24 Hearings TBD

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
17 C. Cost Schedule
We have provided a time and materials cost estimate to prepare the SCEA for the South Oxbow Mixed- Use Project. The detailed cost estimate indicating expenditures for personnel resources and materials for each task identified in the scope of work is provided herein. The cost estimate has all tasks and sub-tasks listed, with billing rates, and total costs per task and sub-task. Cost summaries are provided below and a detailed cost spreadsheet (including all tasks and sub-tasks listed, with billing rates, and total costs per task and sub-task) is provided as Attachment 2.

Scope Assumptions
• This scope of work is considered preliminary and interim in nature. More specifically, it may be subject to revisions based upon feedback from Napa’s review of our proposal. • This proposal is a firm offer of services for a period of 60 days. All work will be performed on a time and materials price basis.
• With exception to the in-house technical assessments listed in Task 4, it is assumed that all other technical studies, site plans, and data, including, but not limited to the Preliminary Geotechnical Report, Phase I ESA, and water/sewer demand calculations, will be provided by the City and/or Applicant during the Project kick-off meeting.
• This scope of work does not include a Water Supply Assessment and assumes the Applicant will prepare one, if determined necessary, by the City.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
18 • Stantec’s scope does not include agency consultation or permits/permit fees obtained from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Should permitting be required and not performed by the Applicant, Stantec can provide a supplemental scope of work and fee, upon request. • It is assumed that potential impacts can be reduced to a less-than-significant level and the development of an EIR will not be necessary; preparation of an EIR is therefore not included in this SCEA scope or work.

Review Assumptions
The cost estimate is based on the assumption the City will conduct a three-week review of the Administrative Draft SCEA document and a two-week review of the Screencheck Draft SCEA document, resulting in schedule presented in Section B, Schedule, above. Should the City determine they require additional time for their review or additional rounds of revisions, the schedule will change, and additional budget may be required.

General Assumptions
• It is assumed the City will provide one consolidated, reconciled set of comments on each deliverable.
• There will no more than 50 individual comments on the publicly circulated SCEA requiring preparation of responses for the City’s Staff Report.
• Should comments on the Administrative Draft and Screencheck Draft SCEA require new analysis, a revised scope of services and fee would be provided.
• Stantec will submit the SCEA document to State Clearinghouse per State Clearinghouse electronic upload requirements; it is assumed that the City will be responsible for further distribution of the SCEA as required by law.
• We assume the City will receive all public comments on the SCEA document and compile them for Stantec.
• It is assumed Stantec will need to prepare a slide-deck presentation and/or graphics of the Project to accompany the City’s Staff Report presentation at public hearings. • When meetings take place as a formal public hearing before the Planning Commission or City Council, the City will be responsible for the preparation of minutes and the keeping of records.

Air Quality Assumptions
Assumptions
• Stantec will provide the City and Applicant with the modeling assumptions for review and comment prior to initiating the comprehensive modeling. The schedule clock will be paused during the review period and will begin upon receipt of acceptance. • CalEEMod will be used to estimate criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions. • If CalEEMod is updated and the update precipitates revised modeling a budget augment will be warranted.
• The criteria air pollutant/GHG modeling includes one round of comprehensive modeling and assumes modeling will be prepared for the existing site (to calculate the emissions that will be displaces) and the proposed Project. Based on the preliminary description of the project, this scope includes 12 hours of modeling. The scope assumes a single phase of construction. If the level of effort exceeds the estimated number of hours a budget augment may be requested. • A qualitative assessment of CO hotspots will be provided. If it is later determined that a quantitative assessment of CO is necessary, a budget augment will be requested.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
19 • The HRA assumes that construction will take place over a single phase. If construction is prepared in phases, a budget augment may be requested. If the construction phasing would place residents on the project site prior to completion of construction, an operational HRA to evaluate the risk posed to on-site receptors during remaining construction would be required and a budget augment may be requested.
• Major changes to the Project features, design, schedule or other parameters that precipitate revisions to the emissions modeling may also warrant a budget augment. • Changes to the Project that occur after completing the analysis that require re-modeling will be considered additional work that is not covered by this scope of work. • The Project is not considered a source of substantial odors. A qualitative assessment of odors will be provided, which documents the distance to any odor sources relative to the BAAQMD’s guidance.
• Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Deliverable
• Standalone Air Quality, GHG, and Energy Technical Study with modeling output files included as appendices, included as an appendix to the SCEA document. The results will be reflected in the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Energy sections of the SCEA. Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Cultural Resources Assumptions
AB 52:
• This scope of work assumes Stantec will work with the City will prepare and conduct all AB 52 outreach and consultation. Stantec will engage Native American tribes based on the City’s lists to ensure that they are invited to consultation regarding the Project. • Within 14 days of a decision to undertake the Project, Napa shall provide written notification to the tribes that requested placement on notice list.
• Notice to Tribes shall include brief Project Description, location, and Napa contact information. • Tribes have 30 days to request consultation.
• Napa shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a Tribe’s request for consultation.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
20 Archaeological and Built Resources Pedestrian Survey:
• One archaeologist will survey in one 10-hour day.
• A 0.25-mile radius around the will be considered for the desktop review. • Assumes there are built environment resources within the Project area. Desktop review will consider built environment resources.

Other
• Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Stantec will prepare Administrative Draft, Screencheck Draft, and Final/Public Draft of all technical studies/assessments.

Noise Assumptions
• The noise impact assessment will be included within the Noise section of the SCEA, and all modeling results will be included an appendix to the SCEA document in PDF.

Transportation Assumptions
• The transportation assessment will be wholly contained within the Transportation section of the SCEA, and all relevant data and calculations will be an appendix to the SCEA document in PDF.

Exclusions
• Intersection level of service (LOS) analysis. Per the request of the City, Stantec has developed a preliminary scope of work to evaluate LOS as a separate and standalone scope of work. We anticipate working with the City to finalize the desired intersections and modeling scenarios. Stantec’s LOS scope of work/fee is included as Attachment 1 to this SCEA proposal. • Site circulation and access analysis
• We anticipate a parking evaluation will be prepared by the Applicant in working with the City Schedule Assumptions
• Stantec will receive approved Project Description and construction plans, Project-related information, base maps, and any technical reports (for example: the Geotechnical Report, Phase I ESA, and water supply/demand calculations) during the kick-off meeting. • The periods shown in the schedule assume a set amount of time for the City’s review of each submittal. If review schedules change, the elapsed time of other tasks will be maintained. • All technical reports will be deemed adequate by the City when provided to Stantec for use in the SCEA.
• All City- and Applicant-provided technical reports will be available for Stantec’s use at the kick-off meeting.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
21 • Within 14 days of a decision to undertake the Project, Stantec and Napa shall provide written notification to the tribes that requested placement on notice list. • Notice to Tribes shall include brief Project Description, location, and Napa contact information. • Tribes have 30 days to request consultation.
• Napa shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a Tribe’s request for consultation.

Deliverable Assumptions
• Draft Meeting Notes for all meetings attended by Stantec (with exception of Planning Commission or City Council Hearings as outlined in Task 8, Public Hearings): one electronic copy (MS Word or email and PDF as needed)
• Bi-weekly Updated Schedule using Microsoft Project: one electronic copy (PDF) • Meeting Agenda for all Project meetings attended by Stantec: one electronic copy (MS Word or email and PDF as needed)
• Bi-weekly Updated Action Items Tracker: one electronic copy (MS Word or email and PDF as needed)
• Draft Mitigation Evaluation: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed) • Draft Project Description: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed) • Standalone Air Quality, GHG, and Energy Technical Study with modeling output files included as appendices, included as an appendix to the SCEA document. The results will be reflected in the Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Energy sections of the SCEA document. • The standalone Biological Resources Technical Memorandum will be provided as an appendix to the SCEA document. The results will be reflected in the Biological Resources section of the SCEA document. The Memorandum will be submitted to the City in PDF as needed. •
• The standalone Cultural Resources Technical Summary Report, which will include built environment findings, will be provided as a confidential appendix to the SCEA document and will include completed California Department of Parks and Recreation DPR-523 Forms. The results will be reflected in the Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources sections of the SCEA document.
• The noise impact assessment will be included within the Noise section of the SCEA document, and all modeling results will be included an appendix to the SCEA document. • The transportation assessment will be wholly contained within the Transportation section of th e SCEA document, and all relevant data and calculations will be an appendix to the SCEA document.
• Administrative Draft SCEA: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed) • Screencheck Draft SCEA for City review: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF). • Public SCEA for public circulation, posting to City’s website, and SCH: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF)
• One electronic copy of the NOA (PDF)
• One electronic copy of the NOC (PDF)
• State Clearinghouse Electronic Submittal (including SCEA, NOC, and SCH Project Summary Form)
• Upon request, Stantec will provide the City with up to three bound hard copies (with appendices on thumb drive) of the SCEA document.
• Administrative Record: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF) ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – SCEA
22 • Responses to Comments for City Staff Report: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed)
• Administrative Draft MMRP: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF as needed) • “final” MMRP: one electronic copy (MS Word and PDF)
• Assumes all black and white printing (except colored graphics) and that each deliverable is no more than 500 printed pages.

Meetings Assumptions
Trevor and Anna will attend the following Project meetings:
• One 1-hour virtual meeting with City staff and the Applicant to explain the process, methodology, and approach to preparing an SCEA document.
• One 2-hour in-person or virtual kick-off meeting to initiate the Project. • Up to fourteen one-hour bi-weekly Project check-in virtual meetings. • One 2-hour virtual meeting for review of City comments to the Administrative Draft SCEA document.
• Up to four 2-hour public hearings (in-person or virtual) for the Project. • Additional public hearings/meetings will be reimbursed at a cost of $2,500 per meeting for both Trevor and Anna to attend, with prior authorization by the City.

ATTACHMENT 1

Scope of Work – Level of Service

ATTACHMENT 1

1 Napa Oxbow Project – Traffic Study Scope of Work & Fee Estimate (Updated October 23, 2023) The project consists of a proposed hotel and residential development in the City of Napa, generally near the intersection of 1st Street and Vernon Street. Primary access to the project site is proposed via Vernon Street, Water Street, and a hotel driveway on 1st Street. The project site is currently occupied by a parking lot and various low traffic generating uses. Following is a scope of work to prepare a traffic study for the proposed project.

Scope of Work

1. Trip Generation Analysis
Estimates of project generated traffic will be prepared using standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates for the proposed uses. The trip generation and the project’s preliminary trip distribution estimates will be utilized to derive a recommended study area for analysis. This information will be documented in a scoping memorandum and provided to the City for review and approval.

2. Existing Conditions Setting
The study area is anticipated to consist of the following seven (7) intersections in the vicinity of the project site:
1) 1st Street & Main Street (signal)
2) 1st Street &Soscol Avenue (signal)
3) 1st Street & McKinstry Street (side-street stop)
4) 1st Street & Vernon Street (side-street stop)
5) 1st Street & Juarez Street (side-street stop)
6) 1st Street & Silverado Trail (signal)
7) Vernon Street & Water Street (uncontrolled)
AM and PM weekday peak period intersection turning movement counts will be collected at the locations listed above using a professional traffic data collection service. The scope of work presented herein includes a budget sufficient to acquire new peak hour intersection turning movement counts for the seven (7) existing study area intersections noted above and 24-hour mid-block average daily traffic (ADT) counts for the study area roadways at three (3) key locations along 1st Street.

The final study area will be determined by City staff through the scoping process. Should the City require expanding the study area beyond what is identified above, an additional fee may apply. Roadways within the study area will be reviewed for the presence of facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) will be calculated for each intersection with a delay-based methodology using Synchro/SimTraffic software.

ATTACHMENT 1

3. Future Traffic Conditions
Traffic volume forecasts corresponding to a cumulative condition appropriate for the project’s anticipated near-term build-out year will be derived. A listing of pending and approved projects in the vicinity of the project site is to be provided by the City. Traffic generation estimates for the cumulative projects will be used to derive ADT forecasts for the study area mid-block roadway segments and peak hour intersection turning movement data for the study area intersections. This will then provide the background traffic data conditions for analysis of the project.

4. Intersection Operational Analysis
An intersection operational analysis of the following scenarios will be prepared:

1. Existing Conditions

2. Existing Conditions plus Project

3. Near-term Cumulative Conditions without Project

4. Near-term Cumulative Conditions with Project
A roadway operational analysis will be prepared for the study area intersections listed above, as well as each proposed project access location. Intersection LOS will be calculated and any operational deficiencies will be identified, along with potential treatments to address the deficiency if feasible. The site access evaluation will include queue length estimates, turn-pocket storage recommendations, and a traffic signal warrant analysis where applicable. Evaluation of long-range/General Plan horizon year analysis is specifically excluded from this scope of work and, if needed, would be subject to an additional fee.

5. Reports
A comprehensive traffic study report will be prepared to document the data and findings of the traffic analysis described above. Up to two (2) draft reports will be provided to the City for review and comment with revisions limited to the specific scope of work identified above incorporated into a final report.

6. Project Team Support
Stantec staff will be available for meetings and conference calls with the project team and City staff when requested. A total of 10 hours is budgeted for such meetings, with additional meeting time available at our standard hourly rates when authorized.

Deliverables

1. 1st Draft traffic study report for City review
ATTACHMENT 1

2. 2nd Draft traffic study report for City review

3. Final traffic study report
Fee Estimate
The fee estimate for the referenced scope of work is $35,788.

Exclusions
The above scope of work specifically excludes the following:
a. Parking studies
b. Geometric design
c. Travel demand model runs
d. Long-range/General Plan horizon year analysis
e. Response to public comments on circulated environmental documents and appendices f. Attendance at public meetings or hearings

Daryl Zerfass PE, PTP
Principal, Transportation Planning & Traffic Engineering Direct: 949 923-6058
Mobile: 949 302-8995
Fax: 949 923-6121
[email protected]

ATTACHMENT 1

ATTACHMENT 2

Detailed Cost Table

ATTACHMENT 1

DETAILED COST - SCEA

SOUTH OXBOW MIXED-USE PROJECT
Rate Table: 2
CLASSIFICATION UNITS RATE Units Dollars Units Dollars Units Dollars Units D ollars Units Dollars Units Dollars Units Dollars Units Dollars Units Dol lars Units Dollars Units Dollars Units Dollars Units Dollars

LABOR ALLOCATION

STANTEC LABOR
Level 3 hour $111 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Level 4 hour $122 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Level 5 hour $139 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Level 6 hour $143 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Level 7 hour $152 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Level 8 hour $162 0 $0 40 $6,480 40 $6,480 0 $0 32 $5,184 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 200 $32,400 80 $12,960 40 $6,480 0 $0 432 $69,984 Level 9 hour $168 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 80 $13,440 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 80 $13,440 Level 10 hour $173 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 24 $4,152 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 24 $4,152 Level 11 hour $189 0 $0 8 $1,512 16 $3,024 70 $13,230 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 80 $15,120 20 $3,780 20 $3,780 0 $0 214 $40,446 Level 12 hour $198 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 $990 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 5 $990 Level 13 hour $209 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 10 $2,090 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 10 $2,090 Level 14 hour $219 32 $7,008 0 $0 4 $876 0 $0 6 $1,314 0 $0 24 $5,256 0 $0 60 $13,140 16 $3,504 12 $2,628 24 $5,256 178 $38,982 Level 15 hour $232 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $928 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $928 Level 16 hour $256 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Level 17 hour $265 16 $4,240 2 $530 2 $530 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 4 $1,060 16 $4,240 4 $1,060 8 $2,120 24 $6,360 76 $20,140 TOTAL LABOR ALLOCATION $11,248 $8,522 $10,910 $14,220 $6, 498 $14,368 $5,256 $7,302 $64,900 $21,304 $15,008 $11,616 1023 $191,152 5% Contingency Budget $9,558

EXPENSES ALLOCATION

STANTEC EQUIPMENT
Field Vehicle day $100 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 $200 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 2 $200 Level D Safety Equipment day $40 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 SUBTOTAL EQUIPMENT COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2 $200

REBILLABLES
Shipping/Postage each $25 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3 $75 0 $0 0 $0 3 $75 Doc print each $250 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 3 $750 0 $0 0 $0 3 $750 records search fee each $1,300 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $1,300 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 1 $1,300 Mileage each $0.555 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 600 $333 600 $333 SUBTOTAL REBILLABLES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,300 $0 $0 $0 $825 $0 $333 0 $2,458 TOTAL EXPENSE ALLOCATION Markup 0% $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $825 $0 $333 607 $2,658 TOTAL COSTS $11,248 $8,522 $10,910 $14,220 $6,498 $15,868 $5, 256 $7,302 $64,900 $22,129 $15,008 $11,949 $203,368 Task 4 - Technical StudiesTask 2 - Consistency
Review and Mitigation
Evaluation
Task 1 - Project
Management, Kick-
off & Regular Update
Meetings
AQ/GHG/HRA/Energy Cultural Noise VMTBio
TOTAL COSTTask 5 - Admin Draft
SCEA
Task 6 - Screencheck
Draft and Public SCEA
Task 8 - Public
Hearings Task 3 - Draft Project
Description
Task 7 - RTC and
MMRP
FINAL_south_oxbow_coster.xlsx Page 1 of 1 Stantec Inc.

ATTACHMENT 1

ATTACHMENT C

Resumes

ATTACHMENT 1
Trevor leads Stantec’s national Environmental Impact Assessment practice and brings a creative, problem-solving approach to his role as a liaison between the various participants in the planning, permitting, and project development process, including project sponsors, engineers, attorneys, lead and responsible agencies, and concerned community groups. Trevor has consulted various cities in the Bay Area on infill projects implementing the current CEQA Streamlining provisions under Senate Bill (SB) 375 and SB 226. He is an experienced environmental impact assessment practitioner, a skilled public presenter, and educator in the environmental field. Trevor has experience coordinating all phases of regulatory review and compliance, including preparing permit applications, facilitating public engagement, participating in hearings and regulatory proceedings, and tracking compliance requirements. He has worked on over 100 CEQA documents, including more than 25 EIRs that have been litigated and has two published CEQA court cases to his name without a single document having been overturned. Trevor brings a creative, problem-solving approach to his role as a liaison between the various participants in the planning and project development process, including the project sponsors, engineers, attorneys, lead and responsible agencies, and concerned community groups. Trevor is also adjunct faculty at the University of California, Davis where he teaches Environmental Impact Assessment methodologies and is a City Council member for the City of Benicia.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
 City of Vacaville On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract  City of Vallejo On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract  City of Redwood City On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract
 City of Antioch On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract  Caritas Village Project EIR, Santa Rosa, California (Infill, High Public Scrutiny)
 3575 Mendocino Avenue, Affordable Housing, Santa Rosa, SCEA and EA
 469 Stevenson Street, San Francisco, EIR and Recirculated EIR  7th and Berry, RDR Facility, San Francisco, EIR
 Midway Village, Affordable Housing, Daly City SCEA and EA  Brunswick, Senior Housing, Daly City, SCEA
 1180 Main Street Office, Redwood City, ISMND
 1125 Arguello, Mixed-Use Office Affordable Housing, Redwood City, EIR  El Camino Real Mixed-Use Hotel and Residential, Millbrae, SCEA  Moffett Federal Airfield, Sunnyvale, EAs
 Mowry Village Residential, Newark, EIR
 San Jose Recycling, San Jose, ISMND
 Caritas Village, Affordable Housing and Social Services Rehab, Santa Rosa, EIR and EA
 Aspire ERES, Charter School, Oakland, Exemption
 Seaport Village, San Diego, EIR
 Northern Waterfront Mixed-Use, Vallejo, Entitlements, CEQA support  Mare Island, Vallejo, Addendum
 Ferry Terminal, Parking Garage, Vallejo, ISMND
 Sacramento Waterfront, Sacramento, Addendum and EA

EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Science and
Policy, John Hopkins University
BS, Environmental Policy Analysis
and Planning, University of California,
Davis

CERTIFICATIONS & TRAINING
Wetland Delineator Certification
Program, Wetland Training
Institute
Watershed Management, US
Environmental Protection Agency
Air Pollution Training Institute
(APTI), US Environmental
Protection Agency
CEQA Advanced Workshop Series,
Association of Environmental
Professionals
Hazardous Waste Operations,
Network Environmental

MEMBERSHIPS
Past Director, Superior and Bay Area
Chapters, Association of
Environmental Professionals
30+
Years of relevant experience
50%

TREVOR MACENSKI
Principal-in-Charge
ATTACHMENT 1
Anna manages Stantec project teams, and she contributes analytical work products documenting CEQA compliance for agency decisions related to urban development, redevelopment, and infill projects. As an experienced urban and environmental planner with 20 years of professional experience, she synthesizes, reformats, and adapts knowledge generated by Stantec investigations for the specific needs of cities’ planning and CEQA compliance efforts in processing planning applications for mixed-use developments, in-fill projects, and commercial projects within the community. Anna has experience in environmental compliance strategies for land use and local development projects in both the public and private sectors. She has experience coordinating regulatory review and compliance, including facilitating public engagement, participating in regulator proceedings, and tracking compliance requirements. Anna is also a Planning Commissioner for the City of Lafayette.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Vacaville On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract • City of Vallejo On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract • City of Redwood City On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract
• City of Antioch On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract • Caritas Village Project EIR, Santa Rosa, California (Infill, High Public Scrutiny)
• 3575 Mendocino Avenue, Affordable Housing, Santa Rosa, SCEA and EA
• 469 Stevenson Street, San Francisco, EIR and Recirculated EIR • 7th and Berry, RDR Facility, San Francisco, EIR
• Midway Village, Affordable Housing, Daly City SCEA and EA • Brunswick, Senior Housing, Daly City, SCEA
• 1180 Main Street Office, Redwood City, ISMND
• 1125 Arguello, Mixed-Use Office Affordable Housing, Redwood City, EIR • El Camino Real Mixed-Use Hotel and Residential, Millbrae, SCEA • Moffett Federal Airfield, Sunnyvale, EAs
• Mowry Village Residential, Newark, EIR
• Caritas Village, Affordable Housing and Social Services Rehab, Santa Rosa, EIR and EA
• Aspire ERES, Charter School, Oakland, Exemption
• Northern Waterfront Mixed-Use, Vallejo, Entitlements, CEQA support • Mare Island, Vallejo, Addendum
• Ferry Terminal, Parking Garage, Vallejo, ISMND
• Home 2 Suites Hotel Infill Project I Vacaville
• International Boulevard Senior Apartments Infill Project| Oakland • La Quinta Hotel Infill Project, Vallejo, ISMND
• LDK Warehouse Greenfield Project, Vacaville
20+
Years of relevant experience

EDUCATION
BS, Environmental Economics &
Policy, University of California,
Berkeley

MEMBERSHIPS
Association of Environmental
Professionals
30%

ANNA RADONICH
Project Manager
ATTACHMENT 1
As an environmental consultant with more than 15 years of experience in environmental review and CEQA and National Environmental Policy Act compliance documentation, Christine has prepared and managed all levels of CEQA documentation, from notices of exemption and initial studies in support of MNDs to EIRs. In addition to document preparation, Christine draws from her legal background to provide a thorough peer review of environmental documents to verify defensibility, as well as engaging in litigation support when needed.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
 City of Vacaville On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract  City of Vallejo On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract  City of Redwood City On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract
 City of Antioch On-Call Environmental and Planning Services Contract  Caritas Village Project EIR, Santa Rosa, California (Infill, High Public Scrutiny)
 3575 Mendocino Avenue, Affordable Housing, Santa Rosa, SCEA and EA
 469 Stevenson Street, San Francisco, EIR and Recirculated EIR  7th and Berry, RDR Facility, San Francisco, EIR
 Midway Village, Affordable Housing, Daly City SCEA and EA  Brunswick, Senior Housing, Daly City, SCEA
 1180 Main Street Office, Redwood City, ISMND
 1125 Arguello, Mixed-Use Office Affordable Housing, Redwood City, EIR  El Camino Real Mixed-Use Hotel and Residential, Millbrae, SCEA  Moffett Federal Airfield, Sunnyvale, EAs
 Mowry Village Residential, Newark, EIR
 Caritas Village, Affordable Housing and Social Services Rehab, Santa Rosa, EIR and EA
 Aspire ERES, Charter School, Oakland, Exemption
 Northern Waterfront Mixed-Use, Vallejo, Entitlements, CEQA support  Mare Island, Vallejo, Addendum
 Ferry Terminal, Parking Garage, Vallejo, ISMND
 Home 2 Suites Hotel Infill Project I Vacaville
 International Boulevard Senior Apartments Infill Project| Oakland  La Quinta Hotel Infill Project, Vallejo, ISMND
 LDK Warehouse Greenfield Project, Vacaville
15+
Years of relevant experience

EDUCATION
JD, Certificate in Environmental
and Natural Resources Law,
Northwestern School of Law of
Lewis and Clark College
BS, Safety and Systems Management
(Emphasis: Occupational and
Environmental Health and Safety),
University of Southern California, Los
Angeles

MEMBERSHIPS
State Bar of California, Member
No. 210812
25%

CHRISTINE ABRAHAM
ESQ.

QA/QC Manager
ATTACHMENT 1

Napa City CouncilDecember 19, 2023

Napa City Council
December 19, 2023