SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS
Office of the City Clerk
City Council of the City of Napa
Regular Meeting
April 16, 2024
FOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPA
AFTERNOON SESSION:
SUBMITTED PRIOR TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
6. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
6.A. Council Spotlight – Napa Central Dispatch
• PowerPoint Presentation from Staff.
6.B. Expenditure Plan for the Proposed Napa Valley Transportation Improvement Act (Measure U)
• PowerPoint Presentation from Staff.
• PowerPoint Presentation from NVTA.
1) Email from Napa Chamber of Commerce received on April 16, 2024.
7. CONSENT HEARINGS:
7.A. Adjustment to Recyclable Materials Gate Fees for Materials • Memo from Staff with correction to a table in Exhibit A of Attachment 1.
7.B. Ace & Vine (Polvora) Card Table Expansion
• Memo from staff with clarification on recommended action.
MONTHLY
SPOTLIGHT
CITY OF NAPA
Napa Central
Dispatch
Service to
Napa County
Communities
City Council Regular Meeting
4/16/2024
Supplemental - Item 6.A.
From: City Staff
MONTHLY
SPOTLIGHT
CITY OF NAPA
Napa Central Dispatch
Presented by:
Christopher Parker-Swain –
Public Safety Dispatcher II
And ….
Celina Davis –
Public Safety Dispatcher II
• Dispatch Positions and Training
• Intergraph-I/Dispatcher
• EMD/ProQA
• DTO Program
• Fire IDT/SWAT
• Wireless 911 Calls and Texts
* The Napa Central Dispatch is the primary answer point for all 911 emergency calls for the City of Napa, City of American Canyon, Town of Yountville, and all unincorporated areas of Napa County. * The center dispatches for the Napa Police Department, Napa County Sheriff's Department, the American Canyon Police Department, American Canyon Fire Protection District, Napa Fire Department, American Medical Response, and Napa County Animal Control. * The center is staffed by:
> 4 Full-Time Public Safety Dispatch Supervisors
> 13 Full-Time Public Safety Dispatchers
> 2 Full-Time Public Safety Dispatch Call Takers
> 4 Part-Time Extra Help Dispatcher
• We are currently funded to staff 29 full-time positions, but as you can see from the numbers above we are experiencing a staffing shortage at this time. • The Dispatch Center operates in myriad of technical equipment, including a computer aided dispatch system, intelligent phone work-stations and numerous computerized systems to access information regarding arrests, vehicle registration, drivers license information, etc.
Dispatch Positions
• Public Safety Call Taker
• Public Safety Dispatcher I/II
• Public Safety Supervisor
• Support
• The DTO program at Napa Central Dispatch is designed to prepare trainees for success as both Call-Takers and Public Safety Dispatchers. • Each DTO must complete a 24 hour Training Officer Program through California P.O.S.T. (Peace Officer Standards and Training).
• Trainees are assigned to DTO’s for about three weeks at a time. For those three weeks or so, the trainee’s schedule will mirror that of their DTO. The DTO listens to all of the trainee’s calls and radio traffic. The DTO has the ability to cut in on radio transmissions or phones calls if needed.
• During each shift the DTO makes notes on each call the trainee takes, or events they dispatch etc. At the end of the shift the DTO meets with the trainee one on one for an evaluation. Each trainee has the same set of guidelines they need to work toward meeting in order to be released on their own.
• The IDT and SWAT Teams are two special teams within
Dispatch that respond to the scenes of incidents.
• For large fire calls like structure fires or major wildland fires the Fire IDT, or Fire Incident Dispatcher Team, will be paged out to assist the command post at the scene of the fire.
• For large law enforcement calls where SWAT is called out, the SWAT Tactical Dispatch team will get paged out to
respond to the scene to assist at the command post.
• We respond with both NPD & NSO SWAT teams,
NPD & NSO CNT/HNT teams, and any other major
crime event.
• We also are part of the State of California TERT
program and respond for mutual aid relief to major
events around the state (most recent
being Chico/Paradise fires)
New for Napa County in 2021:
• Cell phone users can now ‘Text to 911’ to receive 911 help Advantages:
• Discrete when the victim or reporting party are unable to make a voice call • Great communication tool for those who may be unable to speak Disadvantages:
• Extensive delay receiving and relaying information to responding units (fire or medical)
• Dispatch is unable to hear and monitor any background communications or noises like we would during a voice call. This could be critical for in progress events for responding units
• Subject to the user even replying back to any question we send back. Also may be unable to transfer the message if the incident is occurring outside of Napa County
MONTHLY
SPOTLIGHT
CITY OF NAPA
Thank you for
the opportunity
to share what
we do at Napa
Central
Dispatch!!
NAPA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
-
TAX AGENCY
NAPA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT ACT “MEASURE U”
-
PRESENTATION TO THE CITY OF NAPA CITY COUNCIL
-
JULIE LUCIDO
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
APRIL 16, 2024
City Council Regular Meeting
4/16/2024
Supplemental - Item 6.B.
From: City Staff
Recommended Action
Consider adoption of a resolution
approving the Napa Valley
Transportation Improvement Act
Expenditure Plan, as proposed by the
NVTA -TA to implement the Napa Valley
Transportation Improvement Act
“Measure U” amending and replacing a
transaction and use tax expenditure
plan and determining that the actions
authorized by this resolution are
exempt from CEQA.
Items of
Consideration
• Modeling Tool for Pavement Condition
Index Values
• Annual Average Funding and Total
Funding
• Bond Financing Option
• Other Priority Transportation Projects
• NVTA -TA Board’s Approval of Revised
Expenditure Plan/Next Steps
Pavement
Condition
Index (PCI)
A modeling tool is used to project the
future pavement condition index (PCI)
results. The model does not adequately
account for total project costs such:
• Engineering/design, survey, inspection,
materials testing, administration, etc.
• Traffic Safety for All Modes: traffic calming,
sidewalk install/repairs, ADA ramps, bike
facilities
• Drainage, failed subgrade, etc.
Salvador Avenue
Complete Streets
(SR 29 to Eastern City Limits)
Street Paving & Repairs
Sidewalk Repair & Gaps
New Bike Lanes with Green Markings
Improved Intersection Safety and
High Visibility Crosswalk Striping
Improved Drainage
Total Project Cost Estimate: $3.7M+
PCI Model Cost Estimate: $1.2M
Modified Funding Distribution
Agency Existing
Measure T
Proposed
Measure U
City of Napa 40.35% 36.5%
County of Napa 39.65% 35.2%
City of American Canyon 7.7% 7.2%
City of Calistoga 2.7% 2.7%
City of St. Helena 5.9% 6.0%
Town of Yountville 2.7% 3.1%
NVTA Administration 1.0% 2.0%
NVTA Regional Projects N/A 7.3%
FY 26 to FY 43:
City of Napa would
receive approximately
10% less revenue
(average of $1.4M
less annually)
FY 44 to FY 55:
After the Measure
T sunset,
estimated average
annual revenue of
$19.9M
JEFFERSON STREET
REHABILITATION
(APPROXIMATELY $1.4M+)
FREEWAY DRIVE
REHABILITATION
(APPROXIMATELY $1.4M+)
Bond Financing As Option
If Measure U approved, bond financing
would be option for the City to consider
Key Components for Considerations:
• Timing for favorable financial market
• Balance between borrowing and future
maintenance funds
• Projects include traffic safety for all
modes/complete streets/traffic calming
features
Other Transportation Projects
Example of Five -way Intersection
Project
• Would allow City up to 5% of
revenue on other transportation
projects
• Traffic capacity projects like the
Five -way Project are not prioritized
by State
• City initiated Project
• Use of Measure U would limit
Caltrans costs; project would fall
under “self -help” state
transportation policies
• Option for internal funding swaps
Measure T
Projects
NVTA-TA
• For “Measure U” to move forward for NVTA -TA Board to approve for November 5, 2024 election, City of Napa City Council must approve
• On consent calendar for American Canyon today, all other member agencies have approved
• NVTA’s proposed timeline:
1. April: Governing bodies for Cities of Napa, American Canyon, St.
Helena, Calistoga, Town of Yountville, and County of Napa consider approval of expenditure plan
2. May 2024: Ordinance and Expenditure Plan considered by NVTA- TA Board of Directors to submit to County BOS to place on ballot
3. June 2024: Board of Supervisors take action to approve measures for election
4. November 5, 2024: Election
Recommended Action
Consider adoption of a resolution
approving the Napa Valley
Transportation Improvement Act
Expenditure Plan, as proposed by the
NVTA -TA to implement the Napa Valley
Transportation Improvement Act
“Measure U” amending and replacing a
transaction and use tax expenditure
plan and determining that the actions
authorized by this resolution are
exempt from CEQA.
1 Measure U
NAPA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT ACT
City of Napa, April 16, 2024
City Council Regular Meeting
4/16/2024
Supplemental - Item 6.B.
From: NVTA
Measure T —
Constraints
2 • Measure T is a ½ cent sales tax —
approved by the voters in 2012,
operative in 2018, expires in 2043.
• Pay-Go program infuses roughly $25
million a year for local street and road
projects.
• Program revenues are insufficient to
catch up on years of deferred
maintenance.
• As a Pay-Go sales tax, Measure T
increases annually at roughly the same
rate as the Consumer Price Index: 4.6%.
This approach cannot keep up with the
growing cost of construction, which
increases at 10.7%.
MEASURE U —
Opportunities
Without raising taxes, the proposed Measure U maintains existing ½ cent sales tax for 30 years, from 2025 to 2055.
• Allows for bonding
• Allows jurisdictions some flexibility with their Measure funds for non- maintenance transportation projects – new capacity
• Revenue Projections: $1.2 Billion Program
• 90.7% for Local Streets and Roads
• 7.3% on Regional Projects
• 2% on Administration
$56 million for Regional Projects including SR 29 Improvements:
• Airport – SR 29 at SR 12 intersection
• American Canyon – Napa Junction/AC Road
• Carneros — SR 29 at SR 12
Funds Highway Operations and Emergency Evacuations with back-up battery storage and changeable highway messaging signage. 3 Carneros
Intersection:
SR 12 at SR 121
4 Airport SR 29/SR 12 North Kelly Road Intersection – Conceptual Rendering
5 City of Napa – Five-Way Intersection Conceptual Design Measure U allows jurisdictions to use up to 5% of their LSR funds on other transportation projects including capacity.
6 Revenue Distribution
Total revenues assume no borrowing by jurisdiction
Jurisdiction Measure T (2025-2043) Measure U (2025-2055) American Canyon $48,222 $92,722
Calistoga $16,909 $34,771
City of Napa $252,697 $465,931
County of Napa $248,313 $449,705
St. Helena $36,950 $76,496
Yountville $16,909 39,407
Regional Countywide Capital Program and Administration
(including 2% admin costs and debt service on $56 million) $119,289
Totals $620,000 $1,278,323
Amounts are in the $1,000s of 2024 dollars
7 Local Streets & Roads Distribution
Jurisdiction Measure T % Measure U %
American Canyon 7.70% 7.2%
Calistoga 2.70% 2.7%
City of Napa 40.35% 36.5%
County of Napa 39.65% 35.2%
St. Helena 5.90% 6.0%
Yountville 2.70% 3.1%
NVTA Administration 1.00% 2.0%
Regional Capital Projects (Includes Debt Service) 7.3%
Total 100% 100%
The agreed upon proposal is a return to source/lane miles hybrid, updated every 5 years and calculated using the most recent three years to allow for planning and smoothing. No jurisdiction would receive less than 3% of the LSR revenues.
Benefits of Bonding
• Reduces construction costs by funding projects sooner and delivering projects quicker.
• Jurisdictions benefit from economies of scale by
partnering with each other on connecting infrastructure and delivering similar projects (e.g. ADA curb cuts).
• Bonding will make it easier to fix more roads today,
reducing the cost of road maintenance–high quality
roads are less expensive to maintain.
• Provides near term resources to ready projects for better results when seeking competitive grant funds.
• Bringing the funding forward stabilizes annual revenue distributions to the jurisdictions and provides resources to deliver larger projects.
• Minimizes or eliminates impacts of regional capital
projects funding and financing on local streets and road program revenues.
8 Pay-Go results in
significantly diminished
purchasing power for
projects.
Today’s dollar will
lose 54% of its
purchasing power by
2055. By bringing
funds forward, we
will be able to build
more projects for
much less over the
life of the measure.
9 Bonding by Jurisdiction — Modeling
NVTA modeled different scenarios to better understand the revenues each jurisdiction might receive over the 30-year life of Measure U. Below is an example of the revenues a jurisdiction would receive under different bonding scenarios. NVTA bond issuance will be based on several factors including shovel-ready projects, economic conditions, and the health of the bond market.
*Measure T reflects what each jurisdiction is expected to receive between 2025 and 2043 when Measure T sunsets.
Jurisdiction Measure T*
Remaining
Measure U PayGo
(In $1,000s)
Measure U Scenarios Range
(In $1,000s)
Without Bonding With Bonding
American Canyon $48,222 $92,722 $76,012--$79,748
Calistoga $16,909 $34,771 $28,504--$29,905
City of Napa $252,697 $465,931 $381,960--$400,732
County of Napa $248,313 $449,705 $368,658--$386,777
St. Helena $36,950 $76,496 $62,710--$65,792
Yountville $16,909 $39,407 $32,305--$33,893
10 Funding Levels and Pavement Condition Index Scores
Jurisdiction
Financing Structure:
Measure U Bonding Measure T
Scenarios Range
Countywide Average 73.9--74.6 59.3
Measure U allows bonding which will result in meaningful changes in Napa Valley’s pavement condition.
MTC’s PCI Scores Condition
Categories
Very Good 70+
Good 50-70
Poor 25-50
Very Poor 0-25
Soscol Ave. Newly Paved
11 Regional Projects – How We Stack Up Compared to Other Self-Help Counties
Local Streets
and Roads, 28%
Highway
Improvements,
19%
Managed
Lanes, 3%
TDM and Grade
Separation, 3%
Active
Transportation, 3%
Transit
Operations,
26%
Transit Capital,
18%
Self Help County Coalition (25 Counties)
Highway
Improvements
(includes Debt
Service), 7.3%
Local Streets and
Roads, 90.7%
Administration, 2.0%
NVTA Proposed Measure
Alternative 2 - $6 million Pre-Construction and
$50 Million Highway Program
12 Timeline and Next Steps
Approved by NVTA-TA — February 2024 (Draft
Measure approved for circulation at February
meeting)
• Expenditure Plan Approval by Jurisdictions –
March-April 2024
• Final Approval by NVTA-TA Board of Directors
– May 2024
• Approval by County to place on November
2024 Ballot – June 2024
• Ballot Measure to Registrar – June 2024
• Election Day — November 5
13 Item 6.B.
City Hall: 955 School Street, Napa CA 94559
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660, Napa CA 94559
(707) 257
-
950
3
www.cityofnapa.org
MEMO
TO:
Mayor and City Council
M
embers
FROM:
Kevin Miller
,
Materials Diversion Administrator
DATE:
April 14
, 202
4 SUBJECT:
Correction to Agenda Item
7 .A
–
Adjustment to Recyclable Materials Gate
Fees for the Materials Diversion Facility (Afternoon Consent Hearing)
Subsequent to publishing the
agenda material for the
April 16
,
202
4 ,
City Council
meeting,
an
edit
to
Agenda Item
7 .A
–
Adjustment to
Recyclable Materials Gate Fees for Materials
Diversion Facility
was
identified.
For Exhibit A to Attachment 1 for this item, there was an error for “Source
-
Separated Commercial Clear Glass from Napa County (per City Agreement No. 8782” where the current Gate Fees of a $20 per ton credit should have remained unchanged (as it was for
green glass above it) but
incorrectly showed a “$20 per ton charge.”
ADJUSTMENT TO RECYCLABLE MATERIALS GATE FEES FOR MATERIALS DIVERSION FACILITY
(Attachment
1 –
EXHIBIT A
)
1. The Table for Exhibit A “MDF Recyclable Materials Gate Fees Effective 5/1/204 and Effective 7/1/2024 for Napa County per City Agreement No. 8782”
on page
4 of 6
has
been updated as follows
(see corrected
term
in
bolded red text
below)
:
Material
Master Fee
Schedule
No.
Current
Gate Fees
Gate Fees
Effective 5
-
1 -
2024
(Effective 7
-
1 -
2024 for
Napa County)
Residential Recyclable Materials from Napa
County (per City Agreement No. 8782)
7.16.15 $55 per ton
credit
$25 per ton charge
Commercial
Recyclable Materials from Napa
County (per City Agreement No. 8782)
7.16.16 $5 per ton
credit
$70 per ton charge
Source
-
Separated Commercial Green Glass
from Napa County (per City Agreement No.
8782)
7.16.17 $20 per ton
credit
$20 per ton credit
Item 7.A.
City Hall: 955 School Street, Napa CA 94559 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660, Napa CA 94559 (707) 257-9503 www.cityofnapa.org Source-Separated Commercial Clear Glass
from Napa County (per City Agreement No.
8782)
7.16.18 $20 per ton
credit $20 per ton credit
Residential Single-Stream (“Mixed”)
Recyclable Materials
7.16.13 $30 per ton
credit $30 per ton charge
Commercial Single-Stream (“Mixed”)
Recyclable Materials *
7.16.14 $10 per ton
charge
$75 per ton charge
Minimum Charge per load *
$24 per
vehicle
(load)
$24 per vehicle (load)
* Minimum Charge per load is applicable only to materials listed in the above chart with an “*”
ATTACHMENT 1
R
20 2
4 -
__
Page
1 of
6 April 16
, 20
2 4
RESOLUTION
R20
2 4
-
__
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NAPA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING
RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
GATE FEE
S
AT
THE CITY’S
MATERIALS DIVERSION FACILITY
, TO BECOME
EFFECTIVE
MA
Y
1, 202
4 ,
AND
JULY 1, 2024
,
FOR NAPA
COUNTY
PER CITY AGREEMENT NO. 8782
WHEREAS, the City and Napa Recycling & Waste Services, LLC ( “
NRWS
”
)
are
parties to
a contract
by which NRWS provides services to the City
for Collection and
Transportation of Municipal Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Compostables
and
operation of the Napa Materials Diversion Facility (City Agreement No. 8687, hereinafter referred to as “Contract”)
; and the Contract
was originally approved by the City Council
on December 7, 2004, and was subsequently amended on
April
18 , 202
3 (R202
3 -
0 38
)
;
and
WHEREAS, under the terms of the Contract
,
the City, as owner of the Napa
Materials Diversion Facility (“MDF”), is responsible for determining what materials are accepted at the MDF and for establishing gate fees to be charged to third party
customers
for
certain recyclable
material
s
delivered to the MDF; and
WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed projected revenues and costs associated with the acceptance and processing
various
certain
recyclable
materials
at the MDF; and
WHEREAS, City staff has
summarized the increased costs
as well as
de
creased
material sales
revenues
in
the
“
202
4 MDF
Recyclable Materials
Gate Fee Analysis
,
”
which is documented in this Resolution (including Exhibits “A” and “B,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference) as well as the staff report to City Council accompanying this resolution and Attachment 2 to that staff report, all of which are available for public review
electronica
lly
and in the office of the City Clerk
; and
WHEREAS
,
based on the 202
4 MDF Recyclable Materials Gate Fee Analysis, City
staff has
determined
that
revenue from the sales of recyclable materials have
de
creased
substantially
while
processing cost
s
have
also
increased and that certain gate
fees
should
be
in
creased
(or converted
from credits
to charges
)
in accordance with this Resolution
to
reflect
the
lower
market value
and
increased processing costs
of recyclable materials
;
and
WHEREAS, the
Utilities Director has determined that
MDF
recyclable materials
gate fees are
not subject to
the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Public Resources C
ode Section 21080(b)(8)
, based on the findings set forth in the MDF
Recyclable Materials
Gate Fee Analysis
; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to establish
“
recyclable materials
gate
fees
”
to
recover the cost of providing service
s
to
jurisdictional and third
-
party contractual
Item 7.A.
ATTACHMENT 1
R2024-__ Page 2 of 6 April 16, 2024
customers who deliver certain recyclable materials to the MDF , pursuant to the City’s home rule authority as a charter city (pursuant to California Constitution, Article XI, section 5, and City of Napa Charter Section 4) and the City’s police power (pursuant to California Constitution, Article XI, section 7); and
WHEREAS, the City’s authority to establish “ recyclable materials gate fees” is subject to the requirements of Proposition 26 (California Constitution Article XIII C, section 1(e), and the City has documented in this Resolution compliance with those requirements, as well as compliance with California Government Code Sections 66016 – 66019; and
WHEREAS, at least ten days prior to the date this Resolution is to be considered, a legal advertisement was published in the Napa Valley Register announcing a public hearing on April 6, 2024, where a staff report and cost analysis would be made available to the public documenting the amount of cost, or estimated cost, required to provide the service for which the fees herein adopted are levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide the service; and
WHEREAS, the City Council previously established Recyclable Materials Gate Fees effective March 1, 2023, per Resolution R2023-016; and
WHEREAS, the Recyclable Materials Gate Fee for the County of Napa has been further analyzed based on composition studies specific to Recyclable Materials delivered to the City’s MDF and more recent materials sales revenue data; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered all information related to this matter, as presented at the public meeting of the City Council identified herein, including any supporting reports by City Staff, and any information provided during public meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Napa, as follows:
1. The City Council hereby finds that the facts set forth in the recitals to this Resolution are true and correct and establish the factual basis for the City Council’s adoption of this Resolution.
2. The City Council hereby finds that the recyclable materials gate fees established by this Resolution are charges imposed for a specific government service that: (i) is provided directly to those who are charged the fees, and (ii) is not provided to those not charged the fees. The City Council hereby finds that the amount of the self-haul and/or contractual gate fees meet the criteria set forth in the subparagraphs to this section 2, below, based on the facts identified in this Resolution, particularly including the 2024 MDF Recyclable Materials Gate Fee Analysis identified in the recitals to this Resolution.
a. The amount of the fees do not exceed the reasonable costs of providing the service. The fees will generate revenue to offset the estimated reasonable operational and contractual costs incurred by the City in accepting materials at the MDF for processing and recycling operations.
ATTACHMENT 1
R2024-__ Page 3 of 6 April 16, 2024
The amount of each fee is no more than necessary to cover the costs incurred by the City in conducting the activities to provide the services for which the fees are imposed.
b. The City has allocated the service costs to each individual fee payor in a manner that bears a reasonable relationship to each payor’s burdens on, and benefits received from, the City activities and services.
c. Based on the findings set forth in this section 2, the fees established by this Resolution are not “taxes” as defined by California Constitution Article XIII C, section 1(e).
3. The City Council hereby approves and establishes the recyclable materials gate fees and credits for the MDF in the amounts set forth in the column labeled “Gate Fees Effective 5-1-2024” on the chart in Exhibit “A” to this resolution; and those fees and credits shall become effective May 1, 2024 or July 1, 2024 for Napa County.
4. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and the Finance Director to implement the fees established by this Resolution, including: (a) administratively organizing and publishing the fees in the City’s Master Fee Schedule; and (b) implementing and enforcing the fees in accordance with the City Council Policy Resolution for the establishment, implementation, and enforcement of City Fees (R2018- 046).
5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Napa at a public meeting of said City Council held on the 16 th day of April, 2024, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: ________________________
Tiffany Carranza
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
_________________________
Michael W. Barrett
City Attorney
ATTACHMENT 1
R2024-__ Page 4 of 6 April 16, 2024
Exhibit A
MDF Recyclable Materials Gate Fees Effective 5/1/2023
and Effective 7/1/2024 for Napa County per City Agreement No. 8782
Material
Master Fee
Schedule
No.
Current
Gate Fees
Gate Fees
Effective 5-1-2024
(Effective 7-1-2024 for
Napa County)
Residential Recyclable Materials from Napa
County (per City Agreement No. 8782)
7.16.15 $55 per ton
credit
$25 per ton charge
Commercial Recyclable Materials from Napa
County (per City Agreement No. 8782)
7.16.16 $5 per ton
credit $70 per ton charge
Source-Separated Commercial Green Glass
from Napa County (per City Agreement No.
8782)
7.16.17 $20 per ton
credit $20 per ton credit
Source-Separated Commercial Clear Glass
from Napa County (per City Agreement No.
8782)
7.16.18 $20 per ton
credit $20 per ton credit
Residential Single-Stream (“Mixed”)
Recyclable Materials
7.16.13 $30 per ton
credit $30 per ton charge
Commercial Single-Stream (“Mixed”)
Recyclable Materials *
7.16.14 $10 per ton
charge
$75 per ton charge
Minimum Charge per load *
$24 per
vehicle
(load)
$24 per vehicle (load)
* Minimum Charge per load is applicable only to materials listed in the above chart with an “*”
ATTACHMENT 1
R2024-__ Page 5 of 6 April 16, 2024
Exhibit B
Executive Summary of Analysis and Basis for Proposed
MDF Recyclable Materials Gate Fees to become Effective 5/1/2024 and Effective 7/1/2024 for Napa County per City-County MOU for Use of the City’s Materials Diversion Facility (City Agreement No. 8782)
Material
Master
Fee
Schedule
No.
Narrative Description of Analysis* and Basis
of specific Proposed MDF Recyclable Gate
Fees to become Effective 5/1/2024
Residential Recyclable
Materials from Napa
County (per City
Agreement No. 8782)
7.16.15 Page 2 of Analysis describes an estimated
average revenue of $191.98/ton of the category
of residential “single-stream” (mixed) materials
of which 70% is retained as City revenue
($134.39/ton). The City revenue is reduced by a
projected $101.37/ton in over-baseline
processing costs leaving a net City revenue of
$33.01/ton. The $33.01/ton in estimated net
revenue is further reduced by $21.89/ton for
stream’s portion of MDF capital costs (p. 24 of
Analysis). The proposed gate fee (charge) is
the approximate midpoint of the 20% market
volatility buffer (p. 3 of Analysis).
Commercial Recyclable
Materials from Napa
County (per City
Agreement No. 8782)
7.16.16 Page 2 of Analysis describes an estimated
average revenue of $101.56/ton of the category
of commercial “single-stream” (mixed) materials
of which 70% is retained as City revenue
($71.09/ton). The City revenue is reduced by a
projected $101.37/ton in over-baseline
processing costs leaving a net City revenue of
negative $30.28/ton. The negative $30.28/ton in
estimated revenue is further reduced by
$21.89/ton for stream’s portion of MDF capital
costs (p. 24 of Analysis). The proposed gate fee
(charge) is the approximate midpoint of the 20%
market volatility buffer (p. 3 of Analysis).
Source-Separated
Commercial Green
Glass from Napa County
(per City Agreement No.
8782)
7.16.17 The credit recommended for this specific
material type is based on a stable value of glass
for CY2023 vs. CY2023 and previous
methodology specific to City Agreement No.
8782 with Napa County for source-separated
commercial glass delivered to City’s MDF.
ATTACHMENT 1
R2024-__ Page 6 of 6 April 16, 2024
Source-Separated
Commercial Clear Glass
from Napa County (per
City Agreement No.
8782)
7.16.18 The credit recommended for this specific
material type is based on a stable value of glass
for CY2023 vs. CY2022 and previous
methodology specific to City Agreement No.
8782 with Napa County for source-separated
commercial glass delivered to City’s MDF.
Residential Single-
Stream (“Mixed”)
Recyclable Materials
7.16.13 Page 1 of Analysis describes an estimated
average revenue of $179.63/ton of the category
of residential “single-stream” (mixed) materials
of which 70% is retained as City revenue
($125.74/ton). The City revenue is reduced by a
projected $101.37/ton in over-baseline
processing costs leaving a net City revenue of
$24.37/ton. The $24.37/ton in estimated net
revenue is further reduced by $21.89/ton for
stream’s portion of MDF capital costs (p. 24 of
Analysis). The proposed gate fee (charge) is
the approximate midpoint of the 24% market
volatility buffer (p. 3 of Analysis).
Commercial Single-
Stream (“Mixed”)
Recyclable Materials *
7.16.14 Page 1 of Analysis describes an estimated
average revenue of $109.20/ton of the category
of commercial “single-stream” (mixed) materials
of which 70% is retained as City revenue
($76.44/ton). The City revenue is reduced by a
projected $101.37/ton in over-baseline
processing costs leaving a net City revenue of
negative $24.94/ton. The negative $24.94/ton in
estimated revenue is further reduced by
$21.89/ton for stream’s portion of MDF capital
costs (p. 24 of Analysis). The proposed gate fee
(charge) is the approximate midpoint of the 24%
market volatility buffer (p. 3 of Analysis).
Minimum Charge per
load *
Minimum charge set based on separate analysis
performed for public MDF Gate Fees set by
Council resolution R2024-005.
• Note: “Analysis” refers to 2024 MDF Recyclable Materials Gate Fee Analysis (which is Attachment 2 to staff report for this item on the Napa City Council agenda for April 16, 2024 meeting).
City Hall: 955 School Street, Napa CA 94559
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 660, Napa CA 94559
(707) 257
-
950
3
www.cityofnapa.org
M E M O
TO:
Mayor and City Council
M
embers
FROM:
Tiffany Carranza
DATE:
April 16, 2024
SUBJECT:
Correction to Agenda Item
7.B.
–
Ace & Vine (Polvora) Card Table Expansion
Subsequent to publishing the
agenda material for the
April 16, 2024
,
City Council
meeting,
an
edit
to
the
recommended action of
Agenda Item
7.B.
-
Ace & Vine (Polvora) Card Table
Expansion
–
was
identified.
Item 7.B. is the first reading of the
proposed ordinance, and therefore the first recommended action
, of the proposed two for the item,
should
read “Approve the first reading and
introduction of an
ordinance amending Napa Municipal Code Section 5.16.140 (Limitations on Authorized Tables) to increase the number of card tables permitted to be in operation at one time in a card room from nine to 11 and determining that the actions authorized by this ord
inance are exempt from CEQA.
Redlined correction is included below, for reference
:
Adopt
Approve the first reading
and introduction of
an ordinance amending Napa Municipal
Code Section 5.16.140 (Limitations on Authorized Tables) to increase the number of card tables permitted to be in operation at one time in a card room from nine to 11 and determining that the actions authorized by this
ordinance are exempt from CEQA.
Item 7.B.