ATCH 23_IS Addendum (05-29-25) — Napa City Council, June 24, 2025 (part 2 of 2)

Crea
te a Downtown Napa Civic Center:

The project’s key goals will help to

“make Downtown Napa an inviting and friendly place to live, work and visit” (52) and “promote the role of Downtown as the primary place where civic buildings are concentrated and where people come together to enjoy public art and culture, open spaces, and public facilities” (52).
•

Deve
lop an Active, Connected, and Safe Public Realm:

The project is
committed to balancing building development with “a human-scale, pedestrian- friendly environment that is inviting to residents and visitors”

(52). This will be accomplished by “[creating] linkages to and between public gathering places, parks and the Napa River for people to explore Downtown”

(53), including connections to Oxbow Commons, Riverstage, and Public Market; developing “public improvements further the goal of a safe and inviting Downtown” (91); designing a “larger developments that [groups] retail, hotel, multi-unit residential and/or o
ffi
ce bu
ildings to shape distinct and memorable
open space(s), that are accessible to the public” (97); and incorporating

“special building forms (i.e., towers) and site improvements (i.e., fountains or sculpture) . . . to help organize and accent spaces by framing entrances, terminating views and highlighting central focal points” (97). •

Int
egrate Mixed Use Development:

The project’s buildings will create
opportunities for a mix of residential, commercial, and hotel uses. This range of uses will “promote Downtown Napa as an opportunity area for mixed-use development, including a range of housing options and densities” (52) and concentrate “activity-generating uses in the core area of Downtown, including retail shops, o
ffi
ces
, commercial services, restaurants and entertainment venues” (53).
•

Pro
mote Quality Design:

Buildings and open spaces throughout the First Street
Development will be designed to the highest quality and “[developed with] unique structures that complement their surroundings, orienting buildings and entrances to streets and public gathering places” (53).

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
8 WEST ST

MAIN ST

COOMBS ST

RANDOLPH ST

FRANKLIN ST

BROWN ST

BROWN STREET CORRIDOR

HERITAGE
PARK
FIRST
STREET
NAPA
MALL
NAPA
CREEK
NAPA
CREEK
DWIGHT

MURRA Y
PLAZA

PROJECT

PROJECT
SITE
SITE
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
REALM
REALM
OPERA
HOUSE
PLAZA

RIVERFRONT

PROMENADE
NAPA
COUNTY
COURT

VETERANS

MEMORIAL PARK

CLINTON ST
3RD ST
2ND ST

PEARL ST
1ST ST

CLA Y ST

CANYON ST
OXBOW

RIVERSTAGE
OXBOW
PUBLIC
MARKET

PHASE II

PHASE I

TOWN CENTER FOCUS AREA
LEGEND

PEDES

TRIAN CORRIDORS
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

EMBRACING THE

DOWNTOWN FABRIC
Key Elements:
•

Koh
l’s Department Store:

The large-scale Kohl’s Department Store is the
primary building dominating the site. This building will be demolished and replaced with new structures as a key project redevelopment strategy. •

Gordon
Building:

This historic downtown building on the corner of Coombs and First Street offers a prominent street frontage.
•

Res
taurants & Cafes:

The area includes various dining opportunities,
including three restaurants fronting Dwight Murray Plaza (Don Perico Mexican Restaurant, Jax Diner, and Napa Noodles), Allegria Restaurant along the Brown Street Corridor, and Starbucks on the corner of Main and First Streets. •

Dwi
ght Murray Plaza:

The plaza is outdated and ill-designed for the urban fabric of downtown, but was intended to be a prominent gathering area. •

Bro
wn Street Corridor & Parkway Mall:

Connected to the Dwight Murray Plaza
is the Brown Street Corridor and Parkway Mall, which include amenities such as mature shade trees and outdoor dining areas. These mid-block passages increase urban fabric permeability and pedestrian access opportunities. •

9/1
1 Memorial Garden:

The memorial garden and sculpture offers a peaceful
area for reﬂection.
•

Nap
a Creek:

The Napa Creek corridor transects the northern corner of the site and offers green space connection to areas such as Heritage Park, Napa Riverfront Promenade, and the Oxbow Riverstage.
•

Par
king Lots & Garages:

The proposed project area includes over 100 parking
stalls in 3 surface parking lots. The nearby Pearl Street Garage offers additional parking opportunities to visitors.
•

Nea
rby Amenities:

Other nearby amenities include Napa institutions—such as the Napa Valley Opera House as well as shopping stores within the First Street Mall and along nearby streets.
9 LEGEND

PROPOSED PROJECT SITE

EXTG

MAIN VEHICULAR THOROUGHFARES

PROPOSED PROJECT PUBLIC REALM

EXTG

PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS

PRO

POSED ENHANCED

EXTG

PARKING AREAS

PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
JAX
DINER

PARKW A Y
MALL
NAPA
CREEK
9/11

MEMORIAL
GARDEN
NAPA

NOODLES
DWIGHT

MURRA Y
PLAZA

DON PERICO

MEXICAN

RESTAURANT

STARBUCKS

ALLEGRIA

RESTAURANT

MIY AMO
KOH’S

DEPARTMENT
STORE

FIRST STREET

NAPA MALL
GORDON

BUILDING

NAPA COUNTY

OFFICES

COOMBS STREET

BROWN STREET CORRIDOR

MAIN STREET

PEARL STREET
1ST STREET

EXISTING

PARKING
APPROX.
50 STALLS

EXISTING

CITY PARKING
APPROX.
23 STALLS
NAPA

FIREFIGHTERS
MUSEUM
NAPA

V ALLEY
OPERA
HOUSE

EXISTING

CITY PARKING
APPROX.
36 STALLS
PEARL
STREET
GARAGE
APPROX.
403 STALLS
I
:

I
I
:

I
I
•
I
•
I
•
I
•
--
--
•••
-
-
-
-
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
MAY 2012
CHAPTER 4
80 This section provides guidance for development
in the three identiﬁ ed Focus Areas. It is not
intended to be regulatory, but rather to be utilized
in formulating design for new development in
these areas. Focus Areas are geographic areas
in Downtown Napa which, due to their strategic
locations and existing mix and intensity of land
uses, offer catalytic development opportunities.

Three speciﬁ c areas within the city center are
identiﬁ ed as Focus Areas (see Figure 4.4: Focus
Areas):
• Town Center
• CineDome
• Copia
While these Focus Areas differ from each other in
terms of character, land uses, vacancies, potential
development sites and location within Downtown,
taken together they represent the highest
concentration of opportunities for change within
the Planning Area.

The following Focus Area descriptions include
speciﬁ c objectives that should guide future
redevelopment of the area to better achieve the
vision. Diagrams show the key components of each
Focus Area such as land use, access routes and
existing assets, including cultural amenities and
historic buildings. The descriptions and diagrams
represent development concepts or scenarios
for each Focus Area, but they are not intended
to dictate speciﬁ c design solutions. The ultimate
development of these areas should be shaped
through speciﬁ c project design and reﬁ ned during
the review and approval process.

CineDome
T own
Center
Copia

4.8 FOCUS AREAS

5. SPECIFIC PLAN

TOWN CENTER FOCUS AREA
The First Street Napa Phase II Redevelopment is located with the Downtown Napa Speciﬁc Plan’s Town Center Focus Area. This focus area supports achieving one of the key goals of the Speciﬁc Plan, which is to “designate the Downtown core as the location for Downtown’s retail activities, supported by retail, service, o ffi
ce an
d
residential opportunities bordering the core in a mixed-use designation” (53).

The approximately 14-acre Town Center Focus Area is located near the center of Downtown. It is the commercial “heart” of the city, bounded to the east by Main Street, to the south by First Street, to the west by Franklin Street and to the north by Clay and Pearl streets (see Figure 4.5: Town Center Focus Area). The majority of the area is composed of the Napa Town Center and the Kohl’s development,

a shopping mall located on several consolidated blocks. The area also includes commercial uses, surface and structured parking, two public plazas, surrounding street frontages, and a portion of Napa Creek. All of these uses can be addressed and reconﬁgured to reactivate downtown.

This project aims to achieve a number of the speciﬁc objectives for this Town Center Focus Area, which in turn achieve the vision of the Speciﬁc Plan, including:
•

“[I
mproving] pedestrian, bicycle and auto circulation through the design of streets, pathways and passageways” (82).
•

“[Pr
omoting] mixed-use development throughout the area, with retail emphasis on ground ﬂoors to activate building edges and housing and/or o ffi
ce abo
ve. This
site represents the best opportunity for density and height in Downtown” (82). •

“[E
ncouraging] gathering places such as plazas and outdoor seating areas in public spaces as well as private development projects” (82). •

“[R
eactivating] Brown Street as public space that supports pedestrian and bicycle activity” (82).
•

“[Pr
oviding improved] space for a 9-11 memorial” (82).

PHASE 2 - PROJECT CITY BLOCK

DOWNTOWN AREAS OF FOCUS
PHASE 1 - EXISTING CITY BLOCK

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
10 Phase II
Phase II
Phase I
Phase I
---
---
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

5. SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DISTRICTS
AND

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
The First Street Napa Phase II Redevelopment primarily is located in the Downtown Commercial Core Land Use District and partially within the Downtown Mixed Use District. The underlying land use districts will be combined with the Planned Development Overlay District (PD).

The PD Overlay, which incorporates these guidelines, is intended to encourage high quality, innovative and creative development design and allow for varied or mixed uses by providing flexibility in underlying zoning standards and provide a mechanism for preservation and enchancement of site features while continuing to permit efficient use of land. The PD requires the project’s design to incorporate the distinct mixed-used development and public realm objectives into a seamless development integrated into the “Focus Area” as envisioned in the Specific Plan.

The following pages will describe the project design elements in greater detail, particularly in relationship to implementing the Downtown Napa Speciﬁc Plan.

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
11 FINAL DOWNTOWN NAPA SPECIFIC PLAN

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING DISTRICTS
55 FIGURE 4.1: Land Use Designations and Zoning Districts Map Napa River
Napa Creek
Safeway
City Hall
Library
Historic
Courthouse
State
Superior
Courthouse
County
Facilities

FIRST ST

THIRD ST

MAIN ST
OAK ST

SOSCOL AVE

SECOND ST

JEFFERSON ST

SILVERADO TRL

BROWN ST

CLAY ST
B ST

SEMINARY ST

WASHINGTON ST

YAJOME ST

NAPA ST

CENTER ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O

D
R

PEARL ST

JUAREZ ST

EAST AVE

FOURTH ST
A ST
C ST

VALLEJO ST

FIFTH ST

HAYES ST

EVANS AVE

DIVISION ST

POLK ST

MCKINSTRY ST

YOUNT ST

BERNA AVE

CLINTON ST

SPRING ST

CAYMUS ST

WARREN ST

WEST ST

CALISTOGA AVE

POST ST

SCHOOL ST

LEGION AVE
C

EDAR AVE

EGGLESTON ST

BEHRENS ST

WATER ST

ACTION AVE

RIVER TERRACE DRIVE

CHURCH ST

COLLEGE ST

PLAZA AVE

CLAY ST

SECOND ST

BROWN ST

RANDOLPH ST

COOMBS ST

MAIN ST

FRANKLIN ST

FIRST ST
Veterans
Memorial
Park
Promenade
Heritage
Park
Dwight
Murray
Plaza
Future China
Point Overlook
Oxbow Commons
Bypass Channel
N
0 700ft
1400ft
350ft
Downtown Area
Downtown Mixed-Use
Downtown Core Commercial
Downtown Neighborhood
Oxbow Commercial
Downtown Parks/Open Space
Land Use Districts
Downtown Public
Project
Site
PHASE 2 - CITY BLOCK

PROJECT SITE
(PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLA Y)

PUBLIC REALM
~
-~
\.
<"
♦,.
'
.
,,,,,.
r·---------·-,
•
l
I
•
/
.
""\
•
I
,
\
,
I
~
(,
,
I
.

I
\
'
·,
,
\
·
--'
l
.
•
I
.

I
I
I
.

I
·-·
,.
.
\
.
-~
'·
iii
111
11111111••!!!!
··••••••••"'
art
~
·•
A
••
~
■
==u~
..
iil!f
§
~
I
••
=
----~
■
·
,
\
.
\
i
i
.

I
.-
.
--■---
■
-------
•
.J
------·
I
---------·
·-----·
-
-
-
-
-
-
---
---
----
■
■
■
■
■
I
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
12 6. D

ESIGN & STANDARDS
The First Street Napa Phase II Redevelopment project will develop an integrated, active, and inviting expansion of downtown Napa with both private and public realms of development.

Key Private Realm Elements:
•

Hotel Uses:

The hotel will be an STR-rated upper-upscale facility with up to 161 rooms. The Ho
tel will also include amenities such as a restaurant on the ground floor and a rooftop patio and bar, a spa and event space. These amenities may be operated as independent retail and commercial uses from the hotel.
•

Resi
dential Uses:
78 market-rate for sale branded condominium units that will be serviced by the Hotel and may be made available for short-term transient rental in connection with the Hotel.
•

Reta
il Uses:

Up to 15,000 sf of stand-alone retail space in the ground floors of two buildings, along with up to 15,000 sf of hotel and residential accessory commercial space in the ground and second floors of two buildings.

Key Public Realm Elements:
•

Outdoor and Public Spaces:

The o
utdoor and public spaces will include both raised and
atgrade spaces facilitating a myriad of public and private uses. This will include spaces designed for active engagement and connections for pedestrians on adjacent public property on First Street and the former Brown Street. Programming includes the potential for public gatherings, food and beverage sales, and for organized public and private events. •

The Pr
oject will develop a new public plaza (the “New Plaza”) of a size equal to or greater than the Dwight Murray Plaza (approximately 0.18 acres) and in a location roughly aligned with the former Clay Street right-of-way (to create visual connections for pedestrians from Coombs Street to the 9/11 Memorial Garden and the Opera House). The New Plaza will be a pedestrian- oriented ADA-compliant space with design elements for retail activation complimentary to First Street and public gathering opportunities that will include a public concourse running between the hotel and residential buildings that will lead from the First Street Napa mall to the Brown Street Corridor.
•

The fo
rmer Brown Street corridor will be restored and is intended to be designed to meaningfully engage the adjacent public rights-of-way between the Project site, new hotel drop-off, the 9/11 Memorial Garden, Main Street, Napa Creek and the surrounding downtown areas and Oxbow district. This will transform the currently underutilized spaces adjacent to the Creek into an extension of the project’s spaces for public and private uses. •

A new p
edestrian crossing extending from the existing sidewalk and aligning with the mid- block bridge across the Napa Creek will further connect the project to the Oxbow district to the east.

Use
Area (SF)
Units / Keys
Hotel & BOH
Approx. 190,000
161
Residential
Approx. 178,000
78 Retail / Spa / Amenity
Approx. 30,000
-
TOTAL
Approx. 398,000
239
(Not including MEP and Parking)
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY

PUBLIC REALM

CITY OWNED PARCELS

6. EXISTING
SITE &
PARCEL

CONFIGURA TION
13 APN
003-166-008
APN
003-166-013
APN
003-166-015
APN
003-166-016

COOMBS STREET

LLC PARCEL

COOMBS STREET

LLC PARCEL

COOMBS STREET

LLC PARCEL

COOMBS STREET LLC
PARCEL
APN
003-166-010

GORDON BUILDING
APN
003-166-004
APN
003-166-017

0.18 ac

PARKING LOT

PROPERTY
APN
003 -166 - 011

CITY PROPERTY

DWIGHT MURRY
PLAZA
(OUTSIDE OF PROJECT)
N

APA CREEK

PROJECT

PROJECT
SITE
SITE

EXISTING

ALLEGRIA

RESTAURANT

EXISTING

STARBUCKS

EXISTING CITY

PARKING LOT
9/11 Memorial

EXISTING CITY

PARKING LOT
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
REALM
REALM
Existing site conditions showing the extent of
various parcels, current ownership and extents of
public realm adjacent to the project.

The Project will be developed on the 1.94-acre
parcels that includes the Kohl’s Department
Store and other users located at 1106, 1116 and
1118 First Street, Napa, California, designated
as Assessor’s Parcel Nos. 003-166-010, 003-166-
013, 003-116-015, 003-166-016 (“CS Parcel”).;
the approximately 0.7-acre property and the
surface parking lot located at 1151 Pearl Street in
Napa, California, designated as Assessor’s Parcel
Nos. 003-166-008 & 003-166-011 (“Parking
Lot Parcel”) and the approximately 0.19 acre
property on First Street adjacent to the CS Parcel
known as the Dwight Murray Plaza, designated
as Assessor’s Parcel Nos 003-166-017 (“Dwight
Murray Parcel”).

The Dwight Murray Parcel, the Parking Lot
Parcel and the CS Parcel all together comprise
approximately 2.83 acres of land and are
referred to herein collectively as the “Property”.

Other Project improvements will occur within
the Brown Street right-of-way adjacent to the
Property. The existing configuration does not
implement the vision of the Downtown Napa
Specific Plan or Focus Area.
-
-------
I
I
I
-:i
I
~
I
I
I
I
------
'
I
-
----
ATTACHMENT 23

6. PROJECT SITE AND

PARCEL CONFIGURA TION

PROJECT SITE BOUNDARY

PUBLIC REALM

AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO

DEDICATE A PUBLIC ACCESS

AND USE EASEMENT OF
APPROXIMATEL Y 8,310SF,

RELOCATING DWIGHT

MURRA Y PLAZA

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
14 HOTEL + RETAIL &
HOTEL + RETAIL &

SERVICES

EXISTING
GORDON

BUILDING

EXISTING

ALLEGRIA

RESTAURANT

EXISTING

STARBUCKS

EXISTING CITY

PARKING LOT

MAIN STREET

PROJECT

PROJECT
SITE
SITE
PUBLIC
PUBLIC
REALM
REALM
RESIDENCES +
RESIDENCES +

RETAIL & SERVICES

RETAIL & SERVICES
9/11 Memorial
N

APA CREEK
The proposed site configuration, relocating the
new plaza and pedestrian corridor extension
from the Napa First Street mall up to the 9-11
Memorial and Brown Street public realm.

Project includes a new common arrival to replace
existing parking lot.

The 7 existing parcels will be reconfigured into 3
fee parcels, 1 condominium airspace parcel and 1
airspace parcel for a total of 5 parcels for financing, ownership and condominium property division
purposes. The condominium airspace parcel will
consist of 78 Residential Units and 32 Commercial
Units for financing, ownership and condominium
subdivision purposes.

The new parcel configuration will activate down-
town and implement the vision of the Specific Plan.
__
J
I
I
+
I
~--~at
-
~......,.......-..,i
I
p
I
"'
"'
18 e:
"'
(.J
al
~
I
ll
;«,.
l
ij
!
1 ~
I
i:!l
'
I
li:
'
o
l
e
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l0,00'
PARCEL
ONE

1.400
ACRES

BUILDING
ONE

COMMERCIAL
UNITS:
32 RESIDENTIAL
UN
ITS
:
78 PARCEL
THREE
1 .
186
ACRES

BUILDING
TWO

COMMERCIAL
UNITS:
0 S3?'51!'l0'[
110
,00'
ffMA
FLOOD
ZONE
-x
(S
H
ADED)
-
----
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

PUBLIC ART OPPORTUNITY

PROJECT PUBLIC REALM EXTENTS

PROJECT FUNDED
15 6. LA YOUTS AND IMPROVEMENTS

PUBLIC REALM
The project’s public realm will create “attractive and inviting public realm” (109) with “tree-lined, pedestrian-oriented walking streets and outdoor plazas with numerous gathering spaces, outdoor cafes and seating areas, and unique design elements” (109). The site design will emphasize a careful balance between buildings and the public realm with “open spaces, walkways and alleys to break up building mass, allow access through developments and create visual breaks” (95).

Key Elements:
•

Ren
ovated Brown Street Pedestrian Corridor:

The Brown Street Pedestrian
Corridor will be renovated with an improved hardscape and landscape design, seating areas, and vendor areas. This aligns the Downtown Napa Speciﬁc Plan goal of “[enhancing] and [maintaining] the North and South Brown Street Plazas as part of the overall pedestrian and bicycle circulation system” and creating an area “to serve as a plaza/community gathering space in conjunction with Dwight Murray Plaza” (125).
•

Int
erior Pedestrian Corridor:

The Interior Pedestrian Corridor will bisect the
interior part of the project site and provide multiple access points to buildings, a direct pedestrian walkway from the First Street Napa Mall, and more general pedestrian connection route through downtown. This corridor will feature hardscape and landscape design, seating areas, and vendor areas integrated into the Brown Street Pedestrian Corridor.
•

Main S
treet Crossing:

A new pedestrian crossing at approximately the mid-
block location to align with the existing sidewalk connecting the 9-11 Memorial will be funded by the project.
•

Main S
treet Arrival:

The existing city parking lot will be improved and
redesigned to provide a dedicated drop off at the Brown Street corridor. •

Publ
ic Art:

The project will incorporate public art at key locations as identified in the City of Napa Public Art Master Plan. The site plan recognizes that “public art is an important component in creating a unique downtown experience [and] . . . may function as gateway identifiers” (120).
•

Thes
e key elements will create a human scale, pedestrian-friendly linkage through downtown, the project site, Brown Street, the 9-11 Memorial, Main Street, Napa Creek, and the Oxbow.

HOTEL + RETAIL &
HOTEL + RETAIL &

SERVICES

EXISTING
GORDON

BUILDING

EXISTING

ALLEGRIA

RESTAURANT

EXISTING
RETAIL

EXISTING CITY

PARKING LOT

MAIN STREET
RESIDENCES +
RESIDENCES +

RETAIL & SERVICES

RETAIL & SERVICES
9/11
Memorial

FIRST STREET

PEARL STREET

BROWN STREET CORRIDOR

COOMBS STREET
New Approximate Main
Street Crossing
Napa Creek
Main Street
Arrival
Public Art Wall
----
----
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. S

ITE LA YOUT

ACCESS AND CIRCULA TION
The project will address many of the key objectives of the Downtown Napa Speciﬁc Plan’s Streetscape Plan (see Figure 5.3). This includes creating improved pedestrian plazas along Coombs Street and Brown Street; enhancing design features along three streets: Main Street (Core Street), First Street (Core Street), and Pearl Street (Secondary Street); and improving the experience at the Pearl and Main Street Secondary Gateway.

Key Elements:
•

Ped
estrian Circulation:

Pedestrians will have a variety of routes to circulate
through the project site. This includes the primary Brown Street and Interior Pedestrian Corridors as well as pathway connections through Napa Creek.

The design will “provide a human-scale, pedestrian-friendly environment

that is inviting to residents and visitors” (52) and foster “linkages to and between public gathering places, parks and the Napa River for people to explore Downtown” (53). Mid-block pedestrian passages, particularly across Coombs and Main Street, will encourage improved pedestrian circulation within the site and more generally through downtown; these mid-block crossings will “consider [using] in-pavement ﬂashers, and crosswalk signage that ﬂashes to alert drivers of a crossing” (111). Buildings will also be oriented towards walkways in order to “foster a pedestrian environment” (91).
•

Bic
ycle Circulation & Parking:

Bicyclists will be directed to travel along the
mid-block corridors and through the potential improved Napa Creek corridor.

This plan will ensure a “a clear path of travel for…bicyclists through new development, and particularly through parking lots and open spaces” (128).

Bicyclists will be provided with “bicycle parking [that] is conveniently located and accessed” (128) and “route and wayﬁnding signage along bike pathways for orientation and to encourage long-distance use” (128).
•

Veh
icular Access:

The project will also incorporate a variety of drop-off areas, particularly along Coombs, within the existing City Parking Lot adjacent to the Brown Street Corridor and 9/11 Memorial Garden. Fire truck access will be integrated into the site plan.
•

Res
idence Parking:

The residences have dedicated parking in a two level garage structure, integrated into the podium of the residence building. A minimum ratio of 1 parking space per residence unit is provided with additional spaces that are valet operated in a tandem configuration.
•

Bui
lding Loading Areas:

To the extent possible, new loading areas will be
located “within the building footprint or within private parcel, where possible, to minimize adverse tra
ffi
c imp
acts and street activities” (128).

RESIDENCE

LOADING
HOTEL

RESIDENCE
GARAGE

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
16 HOTEL
ENTRY

RESIDENCE

ARRIVAL

DROP OFF

BIKE RACKS
FIRE
ACCESS
LEGEND

PRIMARY ARRIV AL POINTS

FIRE AC
CESS

LOADING & SERVICE

PRO

POSED ENHANCED

PEDES

TRIAN CONNECTIONS
FIRE
ACCESS
HOTEL + RETAIL &
HOTEL + RETAIL &

SERVICES

SERVICES
RESIDENCES +
RESIDENCES +

RETAIL & SERVICES

RETAIL & SERVICES
•
0 0
•••
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. S

ITE LA YOUT

PARKING AND LOADING
Key Elements:
•

Exi
sting Parking Lot Location:

Visitors to the First Street Napa Phase II
Redevelopment will be able to arrive at a renovated drop off with parking adjacent to the Starbucks and Allegria Restaurant and accessed on Main Street making Main Street a key downtown access point. This lot location is designed “to make parking easy to locate and access” (126), places parking “strategically where demand is highest” (126), and avoids “entrances or exits of parking facilities on residential streets” (126). This also allows for limiting impact along First Street by eliminating the existing lay-by lane on First Street, pushing all vehicular drop off into the new arrival.
•

Ped
estrian Interaction:

The parking lot design strategically accommodates
pedestrian circulation by locating access on a “side [street] . . . rather than from [a] pedestrian-oriented [street]” (126) and “[ensures] parking is as unobtrusive as possible and does not detract from the pedestrian orientation of Downtown” (126).
•

Saf
ety & Visibility: T
he parking lot will incorporate “safe walkways and visual connections to parking lots and structures, and provide ample lighting in and around parking lots and structures to enhance safety” (126). •

Sig
nage:

The parking lot will include “attractive signage to clearly direct drivers into and out of . . . surface parking entrances” (126). •

Tech
nology & Charging Stations:

The parking lot design will potentially

“[incorporate] other technologies, such as charging stations for electric vehicles, into parking” (126).
•

Vale
t Parking:

To support the Hotel and Residences, valet parking is provided at the new Brown Street Corridor drop off.

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
17 LEGEND

PRIMARY ARRIV AL POINTS

FIRE AC
CESS

LOADING & SERVICE

PRO

POSED ENHANCED

PEDES

TRIAN CONNECTIONS

HOTEL ENTRY

DROP OFF
FIRE
ACCESS
HOTEL + RETAIL &
HOTEL + RETAIL &

SERVICES

SERVICES
•
0 0
•••
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
18 Given the project’s proximity to nearby downtown Napa historic landmarks and buildings, the First Street Napa Phase II Redevelopment project will incorporate various features to subtly acknowledge this relationship.

Key Elements:
• Adjacent Historic Resources:

The project team will research and “reference
the information for adjacent historic resources to verify that the proposed change is compatible with both the subject property and the adjacent historic resources” (108).
• Height, Setbacks, and Stepbacks:

The proposed buildings will “reinforce the
historic pattern with heights, setbacks and upper-level stepbacks oriented to the many existing two- and three-story buildings” (98). Proposed buildings near historic commercials buildings abut walls and aim to “create a solid block face” (108).
• Style and Materials:

Selected styles and materials will complement the
character of the existing historic buildings (108).

Gordon Building
Winship-Smernes Building
First National Bank Building
Napa Valley Opera House

JANUARY 17, 2021 | 21

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT

PROJECT VISION

BUILDING HISTORIC INTEGRATION

5.8446 in

6. I

NTEGRATION OF HISTORIC DOWNTOWN

DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
Given the project’s proximity to nearby downtown Napa historic landmarks and buildings, the First Street Napa Phase II Redevelopment project will incorporate various features to acknowledge this historic relationship.

Key Elements:
•

His
toric Patterns:

The project will restore the historic urban grain, aligning the street frontage with the existing historic resources while bringing back the implied building mass from the Migliavacca buildings past and extension of urban grid through the new pedestrian paseo.
•

Hei
ght, Setbacks, and Stepbacks:

The buildings will “reinforce the historic
pattern with heights, setbacks and upper-level stepbacks oriented to the many existing two- and three-story buildings” (98). Proposed buildings near historic commercials buildings abut walls and aim to “create a solid block face” (108). •

Styl
e and Materials:

Selected styles and materials will complement the character of the existing historic buildings (108).
•

Bui
lding Setbacks
:

Along first street, consistent setbacks with adjacent existing Gordon Building, continuation of historic zero lot line and building face along First Street. Other property boundaries hold no requirements, consistent with the zero lot line within the Downtown specific plan.

M IGL I AVACC A

PRE-GORDON

BUILDING
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
19 6. ADJACENT I

NTEGRATION OF HISTORIC

DOWNTOWN

GORDON BUILDING
Given the project’s proximity to nearby downtown Napa historic landmarks and buildings, the First Street Napa Phase II Redevelopment project will incorporate various features to subtly acknowledge this relationship.

Key Elements:
•

Inc
entives for Preservation:

The Downtown Napa Historic Resources Design
Guidelines document prepared by Page + Turnbull (Appendix G) specifically identifies historic structures and provides guidelines for new development to ensure they are designed to complement and protect these existing structures.

Chapter 8 – Implementation also includes federal, state, and local measures and incentives for the preservation of historic resources.
•

Desi
gn Guidelines for Historic Resources:

These guidelines must be consulted
for any project involving a property listed on the inventory or that is adjacent to a significant historic property as defined in the Downtown Napa Historic Resources Design Guidelines.
•

New C
onstruction & Historic Resources:

For new development that is adjacent
or within close proximity to historic resources:

1. Con
sider how the style, massing, rhythm, setbacks and materials of new construction may affect the character of adjacent historic resources.

2. Nea
r historic residential properties, set new construction back from the street and preserve the open space and rhythm between residences.

3. Nea
r historic commercial buildings, abut adjacent buildings with new construction to create a solid block face, unless otherwise specified.

4. If an addi
tion or new construction is under consideration, reference the information for adjacent historic resources to verify that the proposed change is compatible with both the subject property and the adjacent historic resources.

5. Con
sult the building code and zoning code in addition to the Downtown Napa Historic Resources Design Guidelines, as it is not a regulatory document. •

Gor
don Building - Additions & Adjacent New Construction:

Opportunities
for adjacent new development may exist at the rear of the Gordon Building, currently a service alley and non-historic department store. The Gordon Building has a strong street presence, and therefore there are no height limitations relative to historic resources on adjacent new construction, except as otherwise prescribed by the DSPDevelopment Standards.

Secretary of Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties:

Items 9 & 10 from the Secretary of Interior Standards:

9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.

10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in a such a manner that, if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired.

STEP TOWER BACK FROM HISTORIC

REINFORCED

STREET FRONTAGE

GORDON BLDG
PODIUM
TOWER

ALIGN FACADE ELEMENTS TO RESPOND TO THE

GORDON BUILDING HISTORIC CHARACTER

ROOFTOP ACTIVATION

CONTINUE A RYTHM OF COLUMNS ALONG

THE FIRST STREET FRONTAGE, EXTENING THE
“URBAN BLOCK FACE”
5 _______________
__
_
______________
_
_____
l
--~
Tiled
pent
roof
pru:apet
Decorative
tecra
cotta
and
brick
facade
Palladian
windows
Multi
-
light
mezzanine
windows
with
terra
cotta
details
Remove
non
-
historic
metal
canopy
N
on
-
historic
storefronts
separated
by
tecra
cotta
pilasters
Decorativ
e
tiled
base
- - - - - -
I-
- - - - -
➔
- - - - -
-1-
- - - - -
t-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-
-
-
-
-
-
r
-
-
-
-
-
,
-
-
-
-
-
-1-
-
-
-
-
-
T
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. B

UILDING ORIENT A TION & SCALE
Key Elements:
•

Prim
ary Facades & Entries:

The project site design prioritizes “[orienting]
buildings so that primary façades and key pedestrian entries face major streets or plazas” (93).
•

Corner
s:

The buildings will incorporate “corners… [with] accentuated with height, articulation and unique roof silhouettes to emphasize their presence” (93). The project will aim to “locate ground-ﬂoor commercial uses on street corners at key intersections” (93).
•

Fir
st Floor Height:

The buildings’ ﬁrst ﬂoor height will be a minimum of 14 feet, which is in alignment with the Downtown Napa Speciﬁc Plan’s Ground Floor Height Guideline Area (95); this height requirement will “distinguish that area as the retail core of Downtown” (95).
•

Upp
er Story Stepbacks:

Buildings will incorporate upper story stepbacks in
order to “retain [a] pedestrian scale” (98) setting; these setbacks will include “balconies or roof gardens” (98).

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
20 GORDON BLDG

HISTORIC MIGLIAVACCA BLDG MASSING

STEP TOWER BACK FROM HISTORIC

REINFORCED

STREET FRONTAGE

GORDON BLDG
PODIUM
TOWER

INDICATIVE STEPPED MASSING

OFF PODIUM LEVEL

PROVIDE EXCEPTIONS FOR ROOFTOP

ACTIV ATION

M IGL I AVACC A

PRE-GORDON

BUILDING
75FT MAX BUILDING HEIGHT

BEFORE ROOF TOP ACTIVATION
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
21 6. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Building Form Standards
Downtown | Zone
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)

5.0 for the Hotel and Retail components
of the Mixed Use Development
Residential Density (dwelling units/acre or
du/ac)
A total of 78 residential units if
associated with the Mixed Use
Development.

Building Height (ft)
Max 75’ , subject to PD Rooftop Features
Front Setback
First Street setback shall be consistent
with the existing Gordon Building
front setback and the building face may
maintain the historic zero lot line along
First Street.

Pearl Street
no requirement
Side Setback
no requirement
Rear Setback
no requirement
Stepbacks
Per Project Guidelines
Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft)
no requirement
Lot Width (feet) at front set-back line no requirement
Lot Frontage (feet) at front property line) no requirement

FINAL DOWNTOWN NAPA SPECIFIC PLAN

LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING DISTRICTS
73 FIGURE 4.3: Building Form Zones

FIRST ST

THIRD ST

SECOND ST

FIRST ST

FOURTH ST

FIFTH ST

SECOND ST
Napa River
Napa Creek

JEFFERSON ST

SILVERADO TRL

BROWN ST
CL
S
T

SEMINARY ST

WASHINGTON ST

YAJOME ST

NAPA ST

CENTER ST
A
R
R
O
Y
O
D
R

PEARL ST

JUAREZ ST

EAST AVE
A ST

VALLEJO ST

HAYES ST

EVANS AVE

BURNELL ST

DIVISION ST

POLK ST

MCKINSTRY ST

YOUNT ST

BERNA AVE

CLINTON ST

SPRING ST

CAYMUS ST

E V A S I V A D

WARREN ST

WEST ST
FAIRVI

HENNESSEY DR

CALISTOGA AVE

POST ST

SCHOOL ST

LEGION AVE
A
VE

EGGLESTON ST

BEHRENS ST

WATER ST

ACTION AVE

CHURCH ST

COLLEGE ST

PLAZA AVE

CLAY ST

BROWN ST

COOMBS ST

MAIN ST

FRANKLIN ST
Veterans
Memorial
Park
Future China
Point Overlook
Oxbow
Commons
Bypass
Channel

THIRD ST

FIFTH ST

DIVISION ST

POLK ST
T

COLLEGE ST
GE ST
EGE ST
COLLE
COLLEG

FIRST ST

THIRD ST

SECOND ST

FIRST ST

FOURTH ST
CL
SEMINA
R
Y ST
R
R
W

ASHINGTON ST
W
W

PEARL ST

WEST ST

SCHOOL ST

CHURCH ST
C

BROWN ST
WN ST

BROWN ST

COOMBS ST
COOM
MBS ST

MAIN ST

FRANKLIN ST
FR
RANK
K
ST

MCKINST
R
Y S
R
R

FIRST ST
W
A
W
W
TER ST
A
A

DOWNTOWN
II

DOWNTOWN
I

TRANSITION

DOWNTOWN
II
Rooftop Features :

In addition to those height limit exclusions listed in Section

Key Elements:

Standards:

The project generally will conform to the Building Form Standards for the Downtown I Zone, which “allows the most intensive development at the very center of the Planning Area, tapering down where necessary to address historic resources and provide a transition to the Downtown II zone. Building form is intended to provide su
ffi
cie
nt height, ﬂoor area and density to accommodate mixed-use development with residential uses above active storefronts” (74). This includes the following standards:

I
l
l
l
l
l
·-----------■-
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. MASS AND FORM

STANDARDS
Key Elements:
•

Prim
ary Facades & Entries:

The project site design prioritizes “[orienting]
buildings so that primary façades and key pedestrian entries face major streets or plazas” (93).
•

Corner
s:

Fir
st Floor Height:

Upp
er Story Stepbacks:

Buildings will incorporate upper story stepbacks at the roof top in order to “retain [a] pedestrian scale” (98) setting; these setbacks will include “balconies or roof gardens” (98). Additionally the upper penthouse level of hotel keys and residences step back from the primary facade for additional massing articulation.
•

Shade:

B
uilding design considers the “potential shading impacts on surroundings” (98). Building height, mass, setbacks, and arrangement “respond to potential shading issues, minimizing shading impacts where they would be undesirable or maximizing shading where it is desired” (98). •

Bui
lding Setbacks
:

Along first street, consistent with adjacent existing Gordon Building, the front setback shall maintain the historic zero lot line and building face along First Street. Other property boundaries hold no requirements, consistent with the zero lot line within the Downtown specific plan. •

Heig
ht Exceptions
:

In addition to those height limit exclusions listed in Section

17.52.220, the Project height limits specified in Title 17 may be exceeded for rooftop patios with conditioned space that are for food and bar service with restrooms and food and bar service structures provided that such features are accessory to the Project on the site and are setback, screened or otherwise designed to minimize visibility from First and Main Streets adjacent to the site, further provided that portions of structures providing rooftop and building fire access are not required to minimize visibility from Main Street.
22 MAY 2012
CHAPTER 4
74 Building Height Standard
• 75’ Maximum
1 Lot Development Standards
Minimum lot area (sq. ft) no requirement
Lot Width at front setback line no requirement
Lot Frontage at front property line no requirement

DOWNTOWN I
The Downtown I zone allows the most intensive
development at the very center of the Planning
Area, tapering down where necessary to address
historic resources and provide a transition to the
Downtown II zone. Building form is intended to
provide sufﬁ cient height, ﬂ oor area and density
to accommodate mixed-use development with
residential uses above active storefronts.

Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Standard
• Up to 5.0 FAR
Residential Density Standard
• 20 to 60 dwelling units/acre
Setback Standards
There are no required front, side or rear setbacks.

This pattern is consistent with a traditional
downtown where buildings are built up to the
property line and sit side-by-side. The guidelines in
Chapter 5 – Design Guidelines provide guidance
for designing buildings to have an active street
presence.

Front Setback no requirement
Side Setback no requirement
Rear Setback no requirement
1 In Downtown I, building height is measured from
the ground to the mid-point of a pitched roof,
or to the parapet of a ﬂ at roof. Special design
features may extend beyond the height limit,
including architectural elements such as steeples
and towers. See Municipal Code section 17.52.220.

FRONT
SIDE

SIDE SETBACK
no requirement

REAR SETBACK
no requirement

FRONT SETBACK
no requirement
HEIGHT
75’ max
FRONT
PUBLIC R.O.W./

PROPERTY LINE
First Floor
Floor-to-Ceiling
15’ min
Per Planned Development Overlay
MAY 2012
CHAPTER 5
98 Ensure that a building’s height, mass and scale do not overwhelm the pedestrian experience on the street. Utilize design strategies such as upper fl oor stepbacks and façade articulation to ensure a comfortable pedestrian scale.

Ground-floor
Commercial
Condo/
Apartment
Condo/
Apartment
Condo/
Apartment
Upper-level
stepback with
balcony and garden
Activate façade
with balconies
10’
10’
10’
15’
C. BUILDING HEIGHTS AND STEPBACKS
While the height limits allowed in the center
of Downtown range from 60- to 75-feet, many
existing buildings (particularly buildings with
historic character) have façades of a smaller scale.

New buildings and building additions should
reinforce the historic pattern with heights, setbacks
and upper-level stepbacks oriented to the many
existing two- and three-story buildings.

Building Heights and Stepbacks Guidelines:

1. Retain pedestrian scale with design strategies
such as upper-story stepbacks.

2. Activate upper-story stepback areas with
balconies or roof gardens.

3. Give consideration to the potential shading
impacts on surroundings. Heights, massing
and site plans should respond to potential
shading issues, minimizing shading impacts
where they would be undesirable or
maximizing shading where it is desired.

MAY 2012
CHAPTER 5
98 Ensure that a building’s height, mass and scale do not overwhelm the pedestrian experience on the street. Utilize design strategies such as upper fl oor stepbacks and façade articulation to ensure a comfortable pedestrian scale.

New buildings and building additions should
reinforce the historic pattern with heights, setbacks
and upper-level stepbacks oriented to the many
existing two- and three-story buildings.

Building Heights and Stepbacks Guidelines:

1. Retain pedestrian scale with design strategies
such as upper-story stepbacks.

2. Activate upper-story stepback areas with
balconies or roof gardens.

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
23 6. BUILDING MASSING &

SETBACKS

ALONG FIRST STREET RELA TIVE TO THE GORDON BUILDING
Existing Condition:

Elevation of existing retail and restaurants at Dwight Murry Plaza

EXISTING & HISTORIC REFERENCE

BUIL TING SETBACK & STEPBACK APPROACH

GORDON BLDG

DWIGHT MURRY PLAZA
(EXTG)
GORDON

M IGL I AVACC A
GORDON
Old Historic Building
Relation to the extents of the historic Migliavacca Building and it’s relationship to the Gordon building

GORDON BLDG

M IGL I AVAC C A BL D G
Design of the Podium:

The first two levels of the redevelopment shall align with the Gordon and references back to the historic Migliavacca Building proportions

GORDON BLDG

CONTINUATION OF HISTORIC STREET

MASSING

STEP TOWER MASSING BACK FROM NEW

PODIUM STREET FRONTAGE
Design of the Tower
The tower above shall step back from the edge of the podium level by approximately 3 feet to maintain the 2-story proportions along First Street and Brown street when adjacent to the public space adjacent to the 9/11 memorial. This reinforces the historic pattern of zero setbacks on interior block lot lines.

GORDON BLDG
PODIUM
PODIUM
TOWER
C

OMMERCIAL RETAIL

(EXTG)
Setback Consistent
with Gordon Building
_____________
_
____
_
_
_
_
________________
l
-
-
-
--
-----
...........
_
--
...

RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
24 6. BUILDING FACADE

ARTICULATION
Key Elements:
•

Ove
rall Façade Design:

The buildings will create a “human scale” environment
and “avoid large uninterrupted expanses of wall surfaces” (100) by enlivening facades with “projecting elements such as entrance porches, porticoes, canopies, awnings and trellises” (100); recessed entries to develop small alcoves (101); complete commercial storefronts with details including

“doors, display windows, bulkheads, signage areas and awnings” (101); expressive elements such as “cornices, lintels, sills, balconies” (101); and well-designed upper level features such as “balconies and bay windows” (102). While it will be important to create dynamic facades, designs will prioritize features and details “that have purpose rather than being applied or strictly decorative” (100). •

Rear & S
ide Facades:

The site design—with mid-block pedestrian passages—
will create a context with most building facades being visible to the public realm.

Building designs will accommodate this layout by develop rear and side facades that will “still be pleasant and inviting” and “have the same level of trim and finish as the front facade” (101).
•

Wind
ows:

Building design will “maximize transparent windows on all sides of building” and create unobstructed views into interior spaces (102). Ground- floor commercial areas will feature “display windows to enliven the street and provide pedestrian views into the interior of the storefront” (101); to the extent possible, these areas will have “floor to ceiling windows” (102). Window design will prioritize “clear or lightly tinted glass on ground floor building façades that preserves transparency” and avoid “opaque, reflective or dark tinted glass” (103).

RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. BUILDING MA TERIALS
Key Elements, continued:
•

Ove
rall Material Quality:

Selected building materials will be of high-quality,
provide visual interest, and “suggest durability and permanence to last into the future” (103). Building “trim and metalwork [will] be related to the building architecture” (103).
•

Bal
conies:

Upper level balconies will incorporate “transparent or semi- transparent railings to enhance natural lighting and maximize “eyes on the street” (102).
•

Awn
ings, Lintels, Sills, Overhangs, and Arcades:

Facades—particularly on
south or southeast facing fronts—will feature “protruding vertical or horizontal shading devices” (101) such as awnings, lintels, sills, overhangs, and arcades to provide sun and weather protection and create spaces where pedestrians can comfortably walk, shop, eat, and sit. These design features will be decorative and “complementary to the overall façade design” (106) and will also help to highlight entrances and assist in wayfinding (106). Awnings will be in scale with the building, be “regularly maintained and cleaned” (106), and may incorporate signage “on the street facing side of the valance with a subtle design reflecting the business name or service” (106). Design of awnings will avoid features which “inhibit pedestrian movement or views” (106); “[cover] transom windows or architectural elements such as belt courses, decorative trim or other notable architectural façade elements” (106); “cover building piers” (106); or include “signage on the sloping portion of the awning” (106).

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
25 --
--
sr..e,
:

L.IIIIIESTM"
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. LANDSCAPE
Key Elements:
•

Ove
rall Landscaping Strategy:

The site’s landscaping will create a verdant,
calming, pedestrian-scaled, and shaded public realm. The landscaping will “be planned and scaled to complement the existing adjacent landscaping and building forms” (99). Various landscape treatment strategies will be created for different sections of the site. For example, the pedestrian corridors are likely to feature a more organized landscape with allées of trees and shrubs within planter boxes, whereas the Napa Creek corridor will feature a more naturalistic landscape.
•

Pla
nt Selection:

Selected plant species will prioritize durable, drought- resistant, and native vegetation, including trees, shrubs, perennials, grasses, and groundcovers.
•

Str
eet and Pedestrian Corridor Trees:

The site design will incorporate trees
species similar or complementary to the existing species found throughout the site and in the nearby vicinity. Trees will be planted along streets with a design and species selection “consistent with the streetscape” (99). •

Nap
a Creek: Except for certain minimal improvements, the Project & Public Realm Improvements will not be located closer to Napa Creek’s top of bank or levees than the existing or previous extent of urbanized development or areas of physical disturbance.

HOTEL

RESIDENCES
TOP OF
BANK

EXTENT OF EXISTING DISTURBANCE
& DEVELOPMENT

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
26 RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
• Integrated Existing 9/11 Memorial:

The 9/11 Memorial sculpture will be
better integrated into the proposed public realm by improving access from the surrounding plazas and pedestrian corridors.

• Seating in Alcoves, Arcades, Setbacks, and Edge Areas:

Building alcoves,
arcades, and setbacks as well as public realm edge areas will be activated with seating and furniture to create a lively public realm. These areas will offer “a range of seating area options, allowing for both large group socializing and more intimate, quiet contemplation” (125). The seating areas will be balanced with “adequate space for pedestrian movement and activity” (99), specifically “a clear pedestrian zone of at least five feet, unobstructed by seating, displays or activity areas” (112).

• Hardscape and Landscape Materials:

Throughout the public realm hardscapes
will incorporate “special paving materials such as pavers, scored concrete, stone or other accent materials” (125) and be complemented with landscaping that “[creates] character and provide pedestrian scale” (125) with “trees and landscaping to provide shade and visual relief” (125).

Key Elements, continued:

JANUARY 17, 2021 | 14

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT

PROJECT VISION

PUBLIC REALM

6. PUBLIC REALM -

LANDSCAPE
Key Elements, continued:
•

Int
egrated Existing 9/11 Memorial:

The 9/11 Memorial sculpture will be
better integrated into the proposed public realm by improving access from the surrounding plazas and pedestrian corridors.
•

Seat
ing in Alcoves, Arcades, Setbacks, and Edge Areas:

Building alcoves,
arcades, and setbacks as well as public realm edge areas will be activated with seating and furniture to create a lively public realm. These areas will offer “a range of seating area options, allowing for both large group socializing and more intimate, quiet contemplation” (125). The seating areas will be balanced with “adequate space for pedestrian movement and activity” (99), speciﬁcally “a clear pedestrian zone of at least ﬁve feet, unobstructed by seating, displays or activity areas” (112).
•

Har
dscape and Landscape Materials:

Main S
treet Crossing:

A new pedestrian crossing at approximately the mid-
block location to align with the existing sidewalk connecting the 9-11 Memorial will be funded by the project.

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
27 RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. PUBLIC REALM -

BROWN STREET
Key Elements:
•

Sha
red Arrival
:

A new shared arrival, replacing the existing city parking lot, will provide a convenient location for both hotel guests and visitors to downtown Napa to be dropped off or valet their vehicle.
•

Pub
lic Art
:

Anchoring the arrival experience and integrating into a new valet support building is an opportunity to provide a public art opportunity. •

Exi
sting Trash Enclosure Removal:

The trash enclosure on the existing City
Parking Lot will be removed. Trash operations that this enclosure served can be reduced with the reductions of the existing tenants anchoring Dwight Murray Plaza
•

Gro
und Floor Activation:

Along the Brown Street Corridor, the public realm
will be activated through primary entries to the Hotel, Restaurant, Upscale Commercial Tenant space along with the new central vehicular arrival, valet service and 9-11 Memorial.

HOTEL ENTRY

SHARED ARRIVAL

PASS THROUGH

VALET &

PUBLIC ART

EXISTING

RESTAURANT

EXISTING

COMMERCIAL RETAIL
9-11

MEMORIAL

PUBLIC ART OPPORTUNITY

ACTIVATED PLAZA

EXAMPLE

PUBLIC ART

INSPIRATION
STAGE

RESTAURANT

TERRACE
FLEX
SPACE

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
28 .....
--~-----
i:==:i-
c:::=J
c:::=J
7 ©
GORDON
HUETHER+

PARTNERS
2025
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

6. PUBLIC REALM -

PUBLIC ART
Key Elements, continued:
•

Pub
lic Art:

The project will incorporate public art at key locations as identified in the City of Napa’s Public Art Master Plan. This is included pursuant to the City’s Public Art Requirement for private development, and is in substantial conformity to the Master Plan, citing that “...public art is an important component in creating a unique downtown experience [and] ... may function as gateway identifiers.” (O2010 4, 4/6/10; O2011 5, 11/15/11) (120). •

The s
pace in front of the north wall of the Allegria building has been identified as a prime location for the public art installation. This location offers viewers a sense of arrival to the property, serving as a visual screen for the large “behind a building” wall.
•

The i
nstallation will face the 9/11 Memorial Garden, establishing a visual dialogue between the two artworks.
•

Cre
ative themes may include history and nature in context with the surrounding architecture and landscape.
•

Sugg
ested materials include weathering steel, stainless steel, glass and mixed- media, all of which require little to no maintenance.

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
29 © GORDON HUETHER + PARTNERS 2025
RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

JANUARY 17, 2021 | 24

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT

PROJECT VISION

SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES
Key Elements:
• Green & Cool Roofs:

The project will include the use of “green and/or ‘cool’ roofs to reduce the heat-island effect” (129). Green roofs will incorporate “water collection devices such as cisterns and rain barrels” and cool roofs will use “materials that effectively reflect the sun’s energy” (129). • Building Materials:

Project buildings will “utilize materials and finishes that are durable and long-lasting” (129) to prolong architectural integrity and longevity. • Window Light Shelves:

Project buildings may include “light-shelves on south-
facing windows and entries to maximize natural lighting” (129).

• Non-Vehicular Access:

The project will incorporate numerous features to “allow for easy pedestrian, bicycle and transit access” (129). • Landscaping, Shade, and Water Use:

The project’s landscape design will
prioritize “[creating] comfortable micro-climates and [reducing the] heat- island effect” with strategies such as “[incorporating] sun angle and shade/ shadow studies to maximize energy efficiency” and “[encouraging] large tree canopies in the setbacks of private development and in parking lots, greenways, parks and plazas” (129). To the extent possible, “native or drought-tolerant, low maintenance plant species” will be used to create a landscape with limited watering and improvement needs (130).
• Hardscape & Landscape Surfaces:

The site design will “minimize impervious
surfaces that have large thermal gain” and instead prioritize “[planting] groundcovers and [using] mulch to prevent ground reflection and keep the surface soil cooler” (129).
• Stormwater & Landscaping:

Strategies such naturally-drained “sidewalk
planters and planter strips (i.e., in landscaped bulbouts and along sidewalk edges)” will be used to the extent possible to collect stormwater run-off. This approach will help to create an environment of natural percolation and replace piped percolation where possible (130). Throughout the site, “new open spaces [will be explored] as opportunities for stormwater detention and infiltration” (130).
• Stormwater & Permeable Surfaces:

The project will prioritize “[using]
permeable pavers around tree wells instead of impervious materials in order to increase the infiltration of stormwater run-off” (130). • Stormwater & Education:

The site design will “consider the use of permeable
pavers and stormwater planters as opportunities for interpretive or educational signage” (130).

6. SUSTAINABLE STRATEGIES
Key Elements:
•

Green & Cool Roofs:

The p
roject will include the use of “green and/or ‘cool’ roofs to reduce the heat-island effect” (129). Green roofs will incorporate

“water collection devices such as cisterns and rain barrels” and cool roofs will use “materials that effectively reflect the sun’s energy” (129). •

Buil
ding Materials:

Project buildings will “utilize materials and finishes that are durable and long-lasting” (129) to prolong architectural integrity and longevity. •

Win
dow Light Shelves:

Project buildings may include “light-shelves on south-facing windows and entries to maximize natural lighting” (129). •

Non
-Vehicular Access:

The project will incorporate numerous features to “allow for easy pedestrian, bicycle and transit access” (129).
•

Lands
caping, Shade, and Water Use:

The project’s landscape design will prioritize
“[creating] comfortable micro-climates and [reducing the] heat-island effect” with strategies such as “[incorporating] sun angle and shade/shadow studies to maximize energy efficiency” and “[encouraging] large tree canopies in the setbacks of private development and in parking lots, greenways, parks and plazas” (129). To the extent possible, “native or drought-tolerant, low maintenance plant species” will be used to create a landscape with limited watering and improvement needs (130). •

Har
dscape & Landscape Surfaces:

The site design will “minimize impervious surfaces
that have large thermal gain” and instead prioritize “[planting] groundcovers and [using] mulch to prevent ground reflection and keep the surface soil cooler” (129). •

Sto
rmwater & Landscaping:

Throughout the site, “new open spaces [will be explored] as opportunities for stormwater detention and infiltration” (130).
•

Sto
rmwater & Permeable Surfaces:

The project will prioritize “[using] permeable
pavers around tree wells instead of impervious materials in order to increase the infiltration of stormwater run-off” (130).
•

Sto
rmwater & Education:

The site design will “consider the use of permeable pavers and stormwater planters as opportunities for interpretive or educational signage” (130).

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
30 RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
31 Key Elements:
• Lighting Intent:

The site’s lighting design is intended to “enhance the best qualities of that building [and] not to become a ‘beacon,”[by incorporating] light levels . . . appropriate for the amount of illumination intended” (105). The overall lighting strategy will “enhance the ambiance and safety of Downtown through the use of strategically placed lighting elements” (91). • Lighting Design:

The site design will primarily rely upon “building-mounted lighting . . . particularly in pedestrian-oriented and high-visibility areas, and [will] be designed and placed to accent the building’s architectural characteristics” (104). This strategy of “architectural lighting [will] enhance a building during twilight and night time hours” (104), “ensure building entrances are well-lit with appropriately-scaled light fixtures that complement the architectural style of the building” (104), incorporate “light fixtures and poles [that] are architecturally compatible with the building’s architectural style” (104), and include a “color and finish of lighting metalwork [that will] harmonize with building metalwork, if applicable” (104).
• Signage Intent:

The site design’s pedestrian corridors will incorporate “Secondary Gateways [that] include pedestrian-scaled wayfinding signage and/or directional kiosks” (123). These “Secondary Gateways are located within Downtown and are scaled to pedestrians rather than vehicles” (123). Signage located on buildings will be “on wall areas or architectural features specifically designed for them such as recessed wall areas, towers, turrets or parapets” (105).
• Signage Design:

Signage will “reflect a crafted, high-quality, detailed design approach” (105); “ensure sign shapes, type styles and color combinations complement building styles and reflect the business they represent” (105); and incorporate “the uses they represent in creative and fun, as well as functional, ways” (105).
• Furniture:

A variety of public furniture—including benches, tables, chairs, umbrellas, bollards, waste receptacles, and bicycle racks—will be used to create an inviting public realm scaled to the pedestrian experience. These furnishings are intended to “provide convenience to pedestrians and enhance the historic setting of Downtown” (120).
• Public Art:

JANUARY 17, 2021 | 22

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT

PROJECT VISION

LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, FURNITURE, AND ART

6. LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, AND FURNITURE
Key Elements:
•

Light
ing Intent:

Lig
hting Design:

The site design will primarily rely upon “building-mounted lighting . . . particularly in pedestrian-oriented and high-visibility areas,

and [will] be designed and placed to accent the building’s architectural characteristics” (104). This strategy of “architectural lighting [will] enhance a building during twilight and night time hours” (104), “ensure building entrances are well-lit with appropriately-scaled light fixtures that complement the architectural style of the building” (104), incorporate “light fixtures and poles [that] are architecturally compatible with the building’s architectural style”

(104), and include a “color and finish of lighting metalwork [that will] harmonize with building metalwork, if applicable” (104). Additional opportunities for light posts along the Brown Street Corridor will be identified and located to be complimentary to the architectural lighting along the public realm. •

Sig
nage Intent:

The site design’s pedestrian corridors will incorporate

“Secondary Gateways [that] include pedestrian-scaled wayfinding signage and/or directional kiosks” (123). These “Secondary Gateways are located within Downtown and are scaled to pedestrians rather than vehicles” (123). Signage located on buildings will be “on wall areas or architectural features specifically designed for them such as recessed wall areas, towers, turrets or parapets” (105). •

Sign
age Design:

Fur
niture:

RIOS
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

COOMBS STREET

DWIGHT MURRAY PLAZA

PEARL STREET
1st STREET

MAIN STREET

PEARL STREET
1st STREET
C5.0

DEMOLITION PLAN
Project No.
415 Jackson St, Suite 100
San Francisco, CA 94111
T 415/673-8990
www.10sb.co
A California Corporation
SB ARCHITECTS, INC.

A22134-1
Sheet No.

Sheet Title
Issued

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Owner

NAPA FIRST STREET HOTEL & BRANDED RESIDENTIAL

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT
FIRST STREET, NAPA, CA 94559
Coombs Street LLC
3160 Crow Canyon Rd.

San Ramon, CA 94583
Z:\2022\A22134-1\DWG\CIVIL\A22134-1-DP.dwg
[C5.0 DEMOLITION PLAN] Plot: Friday, January 31, 2025 ANDY ARCHER

1. DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ONLY EXISTING BUILDINGS AS DEPICTED BY BUILDING REMOVAL PATTERN SHOWN IN LEGEND. REMOVE ALL UNDER SLAB UTILITIES AND CUT/CAP WET OR DRY UTILITIES 5' FROM BUILDING. FOUNDATION TO BE REMOVED IN IT'S ENTIRETY.

2. SITE WORK DEMOLITION SHALL INCLUDE THE REMOVAL OF ALL CONCRETE THAT IS

DEPICTED BY CONCRETE REMOVAL PATTERN (SEE LEGEND), INCLUDING AC

PAVEMENT, BASE ROCK AND ALL UTILITIES (NOT DESIGNATED FOR PROTECTION) WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS OF WORK.

3. ALL UNUSED PUBLIC UTILITY LATERALS WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE ABANDONED AND CAPPED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR 5' FROM EXISTING BUILDING IF IT'S LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.

4. REMOVE ALL LANDSCAPE GROUND COVER AND SHRUBS WITHIN PROJECT LIMIT OF WORK AS DEPICTED BY REMOVAL PATTERN SHOWN IN LEGEND.

5. REMOVE ALL IRRIGATION WITHIN CONCRETE PLANTER AREAS HAVING EXISTING TREES REMOVED.

LEGEND

KEYNOTES

REMOVE CONCRETE CURB

REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER

REMOVE IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING

REMOVE WALL & FOUNDATION IN IT'S ENTIRETY

REMOVE ELECTRICAL BOX

REMOVE UNKNOWN UTILITY BOX
REMOVE ELECTRICAL VAULT AND/OR LINE TO BLDG. ANY ELECTRICAL LINE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE ABANDONED IN PLACE. TERMINATE ELECTRICAL LINE AT VAULT OR BOX AND CAP ON-SITE WHERE SHOWN.

REMOVE SITE LIGHT, CONCRETE BASE, CONDUIT & ELECTRIC LINE

REMOVE SITE LIGHT BOX

REMOVE FLAG POLE, BASE, AND ELECTRICAL CONNECTION IF EQUIPPED

REMOVE SANITARY SEWER BOX

REMOVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

REMOVE SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

CAP OR PLUG SANITARY SEWER LATERAL - SEE PLAN

REMOVE TELEPHONE LINE AND/OR BOX

REMOVE TELEPHONE BOOTH

CABLE TV LINE TO BE CAPPED AND OR REMOVE CTV BOX

REMOVE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

REMOVE STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN AND/OR SUMP PUMP

CAP OR PLUG STORM DRAIN LINE AS SHOWN

REMOVE STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT
REMOVE "STATUE" STRUCTURE AND/OR RELOCATED PER LANDSCAPE PLANS

REMOVE FDC AT BLDG WALL AND CAP SERVICE LATERAL

REMOVE WATER VALVE

REMOVE WATER BOX

CAP WATERLINE SERVICE

CAP GAS LINE, AND/OR REMOVE GAS MANHOLE OR BOX

REMOVE WOODEN PLANTER BOX

REMOVE STEEL COLUMN

REMOVE CONCRETE OR STEEL WALL

REMOVE SIGN, POLE, AND BASE

REMOVE ROCK WATER FOUNTAIN STRUCTURE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING MONITORING WELL AT ALL TIMES BY THE

CONTRACTOR DURING THE DEMOLITION PHASE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING WATERLINE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING WATER BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING WATER VALVE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING ELECTRICAL BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING UTILITY BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING ELECTRICAL PEDESTAL

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING ELECTRICAL VAULT
PROTECT EXISTING TREE IN PLACE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR TREE

PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS, FENCING & DETAILS

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN AND STORM

DRAIN PIPE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM WATER CURB INLET

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE OR BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING TELEPHONE LINE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SITE LIGHT

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING GAS VALVE BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SIGN

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER BOX

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPE

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING PIPE BOLLARD

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING WOODEN FENCE AND RETAINING WALL

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING SITE LIGHT

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM WATER CURB INLET

PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPE

RELOCATE EXISTING TREE PER LANDSCAPE PLANS

RELOCATE/PRESERVE EXISTING SIGN, AND TO BE ELEVATED

REMOVE EX UNDERGROUND UTILITIES

DEMOLISH EXISTING BUILDING

REMOVE EX CONCRETE, BRICK PAVERS, AND BASE ROCK

REMOVE EXISTING AC PAVEMENT AND BASE ROCK

PLUG & CAP EXISTING UTILITY WHERE SHOWN

REMOVE IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING

SAWCUT LINE

EX TREE AND STUMP TO BE REMOVED
LEGEND

7. D

EMOLITION PLAN

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
32 A demolition plan that takes various site access,
screening, security and construction needs has
been developed in conjunction with the design
team.

The demolition and construction phases will
be thoughtfully planned to limit disruption to
visitors and adjacent buildings in downtown
and maximize safety. The project will utilize
common construction practices to complete
demolition and construction in the most
expeditious and efficient manner possible.

Construction fencing will surround the
perimeter of the site along First Street, around
the Gordon Building, up Coombs and Pearl, then
following a meandering path along the creek to
the 9/11 Memorial and out to Main Street before
coming back to Brown Street and then First.

Visually appealing graphics will be applied to
construction fencing at certain areas on First
and Main Streets. Typical 30-foot construction
gates will be placed around the site with two on
Coombs Street, one on First, and one on Pearl. 2
15-foot construction gates will be located off of
Main Street. Temporary crosswalks will also be
utilized to ensure safe and convenient pedestrian
paths of travel while under construction.

Additionally, the construction site will maintain
surveillance systems around the site to maintain
safety and accountability, and to ensure no
unexpected delays due to vandalism, tampering,
or theft.
i
u
:::J
ID
:::,
Q.
~
'''''
'''
''
'''
''
''''''
'2~
6 ~

9.QJ
IQ.
'''
''''''''''
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
~
~
~
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
~
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~
_
,,,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
X
X
X
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
;
~
,
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
,
;
•
\
~
~
'
~
o,
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
'
i
f
52 '
RE
'''
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
'
IE

17.4-7
IO"(NW)
'-
'\.
'-
'-
'-
'-
'\
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
"\
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'\
'-
'\
'-
'\'
'-
'\
'-
'-
'\
'-
'\
'-
'-
'\
'-
'-
'\
'-
'\
'-
'\
'-
'-
'\
'-
'\
'\
'-
'\
'-
'-
'\
'-
'\
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'
'-
'-~
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'-
'''
''
'''
'''
''
'''
''
,
~
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' I~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'''''~~ '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' 8 ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, rn
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ~
if"~Jof8-(NW)
'
'''
'''''
'''
''
'''
'''
''
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'''''''''
'''
''
'''
I
-
~
l--:
,
\
(--:
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
!
,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .
,,
~
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' "
,
,,A,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, •
)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '
·
''''~'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
~
''
'
'
'''
'''''
'''
''''
'
''
'
''
''
'
''
'''
''
'
'
,
-:
,'
.
v
,
\'.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,~,
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,

EXISITNGBURDING
,,,,,,,,,,,,
'
!
?
~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '
,
~
'
~
~
~
;
~
,
~
~
-
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~:
·
ixisTiN(/aUILfJ1NG
.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
,.;,t
~
~
~
~
~
,
~
:
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
_
T?
~:
?7fr!~L:~H_E?
,:
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
''''
'''''
'''
'.

TOBE

DEMOUSHED
'''
'''''
''''
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~''''''''''''''~~~~~~~~~~~~f
v,,,
~
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'''
'
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
,;;:.
~
,
,
.
,
''
'''
'''''
'''
''
'''
'''
''
'''''''''
''''''''
'''''''''
'''
''
'''
'''
''
''''
~
~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
,
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
1'
'''''
'''
''''
'
''
'
''
''
'
''
'
''
''
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
.,
w•;
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
''
'
''
''
'
''
'
''
''
'
'
~
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
·
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I
.2'---
11:'.:
-~lrP;c,I
''''
''''''''''
I
''''''''''''''
r--
.Jrk
'
'''
'''''
'''
''
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
''
'''
''
'
'
'
',
,.
,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'
5'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ )
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ~
*~~~
~~=~=r=~=::l.==~=~~=::l:i,,,,,,'=::er=
m
\
8 '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' ('
1 ~
'''
'''''
'''
''
'''
'''
''
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
'''''''''
'''
''
'''
'''
''
''''
'ifff!Eo°,[sfa_°uRfnoN
:f::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 7 A,
l'-'
t
'--"
--Jf"
~
I
~N~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~7' -
~
'
-
~
-
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
-
~
~-
•
1 -
t
1 ,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,~
,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' ,j
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
,'
~
'
'i
'
,.
~
,
,
:--.
'''
'''
''''
'
''
'
''
''
'
''
'
''
''
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
''
'
''
''
'
''
'
''
''
'
'
'
"i
'
'
~~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
<
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
c_
~
-r,
_,
,
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
~
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
·
~
~
_
'
'
-
~
~
''''
'''
'''''
'''
''
'''
'''
''
''''''''''''
,
-
,
'''''''''''''''
'''''''''
'''
''
'''
'''
''
'').'
'~
-
~
{
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~;;;;;
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~"
~'
~
-
',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
(ll
2116
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
'i,
5111H
''''''''''''''''''''''

EXISTING

BUILDING
(TORE
/1,M
JN}
~
K
IHHWR
I
GH
T
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

CONSERVATORY

OVERALL BUIDLING
244' - 0"
PASEO
42' - 6"

OVERALL BUIDLING
246' - 6"

OVERALL BUIDLING
240' - 7"

OVERALL BUIDLING
149' - 3"

OVERALL BUIDLING
246' - 6"
PASEO
40' - 0"

OVERALL BUIDLING
130' - 2"
240' - 7" PASEO LENGTH

PARKING GARAGE ENTRY

RESIDENCE

MAIN ENTRY
TRASH

HOTEL MAIN
ENTRY

FIRE CONTROL
ROOM

FIRE CONTROL
ROOM
30FT TRUCK TURNING

DIAGRAM
30FT TRUCK TURNING

DIAGRAM

EXISTING

PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE
HOTEL

DROP-OFF
(E) ACCESS PATH TO
REMAIN

LOADING & TRASH
ACCESS
91' - 6"
1 A1.05

PROPERTY LINE
135' - 2"

PROPERTY LINE
335' - 1"

PROPERTY LINE
70' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE
241' - 4"

PROPERTY LINE
8' - 8"

PROPERTY LINE
150' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE
90' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE
424' - 4"

PROPERTY LINE
116' - 6"
A2.77
1 EXISTING MAIN STREET

PARKING LOT

EXISTING MAIN STREET

PARKING LOT

NAPA CREEK

MAIN STREET

STARBUCKS
Scale: N.T.S.

SITE CONSTRUCTION FENCE PLAN
1 Date
SLP-3
Project number
Drawn by
Checked by

GENERALPLAN
9271
Project Name: NFS
Client Name
01/30/25
DG
GE
N.T.S
No.

Description
Date

NAPA FIRST STREET HOTEL &

NAPA, CA
FOR Approval

BRANDED RESIDENTIAL
www.buildgc.com
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434
http://www.pacific-structures.com/
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434

CONSTRUCTION FENCE GATE
(30' WIDE) TYP.

CONSTRUCTION FENCE GATES
(15' WIDE)

TEMP CONSTRUCTION

CROSSING

NAPA FIRST STREET PROJECT

COOMBS STREET

PEARL STREET
1ST STREET

7. S

ITE CONSTRUCTION

FENCING AND

LOGISTICS PLAN

CONSERVATORY

OVERALL BUIDLING
244' - 0"
PASEO
42' - 6"

OVERALL BUIDLING
246' - 6"

OVERALL BUIDLING
240' - 7"

OVERALL BUIDLING
149' - 3"

OVERALL BUIDLING
246' - 6"
PASEO
40' - 0"

OVERALL BUIDLING
130' - 2"
240' - 7" PASEO LENGTH

PARKING GARAGE ENTRY

RESIDENCE

MAIN ENTRY
TRASH

HOTEL MAIN
ENTRY

FIRE CONTROL
ROOM

FIRE CONTROL
ROOM
30FT TRUCK TURNING

DIAGRAM
30FT TRUCK TURNING

DIAGRAM

EXISTING

PEDESTRIAN
BRIDGE
HOTEL

DROP-OFF
(E) ACCESS PATH TO
REMAIN

LOADING & TRASH
ACCESS
91' - 6"
1 A1.05

PROPERTY LINE
135' - 2"

PROPERTY LINE
335' - 1"

PROPERTY LINE
70' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE
241' - 4"

PROPERTY LINE
8' - 8"

PROPERTY LINE
150' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE
90' - 0"

PROPERTY LINE
424' - 4"

PROPERTY LINE
116' - 6"
A2.77
1 EXISTING MAIN STREET

PARKING LOT

EXISTING MAIN STREET

PARKING LOT

NAPA CREEK

MAIN STREET

STARBUCKS
Scale: N.T.S.

SITE CONSTRUCTION FENCE PLAN
1 Date
SLP-3
Project number
Drawn by
Checked by

GENERALPLAN
9271
Project Name: NFS
Client Name
01/30/25
DG
GE
N.T.S
No.

Description
Date

NAPA FIRST STREET HOTEL &

NAPA, CA
FOR Approval

BRANDED RESIDENTIAL
www.buildgc.com
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434
http://www.pacific-structures.com/
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434

CONSTRUCTION FENCE GATE
(30' WIDE) TYP.

CONSTRUCTION FENCE GATES
(15' WIDE)

TEMP CONSTRUCTION

CROSSING

NAPA FIRST STREET PROJECT

COOMBS STREET

PEARL STREET
1ST STREET

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
33 As construction commences, the site
construction fencing to screen and secure the
site has been developed in conjunction with the
Contractor.

During construction, temporary pedestrian
crosswalks and designations will be provided to
ease pedestrian access around the site.
..
..
1/
~
.
r---~-:_;:;.-..r---
~-
l
,
<
---
_7""'-
----
"
.
--------
l
\
I
LEGEND:

I I

CONSTRUCTION
GATE
- - - -

CONSTRUCTION
FENCE

PENDING
SFMTA

APPROVAL
+
....

TRUCK
ROUTE:

ARRIVING
AT
SITE
TRUCK
ROUTE:

EXITING
SITE
-

PEDESTRIAN
PATH

PORTABLE
TOILET
■

HANDWASHING

STATION
~
KIHHWR
I
GHT
1053
ATTACHMENT 23

COOMBS STREET

DWIGHT MURRAY PLAZA

PEARL STREET
1st STREET

TEMPORARY

PEDESTRIAN
CROSS WALK, (2)

STOP SIGNS AND

BARRICADES
(TYP.)
Scale: N.T.S.

SITE LOGISTICS PLAN - CIVIL COORDINATION
1 Date
SLP-2
Project number
Drawn by
Checked by

GENERALPLAN
9271
Project Name: NFS
Client Name: -
01/30/25
DG
GE
N.T.S
No.

Description
Date

NAPA FIRST STREET HOTEL &

NAPA, CA
FOR Approval

BRANDED RESIDENTIAL
www.buildgc.com
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434
http://www.pacific-structures.com/
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434

TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK,
(2) STOP SIGNS & BARRICADES

7. S

ITE LOGISTICS PLAN

COOMBS STREET

DWIGHT MURRAY PLAZA

PEARL STREET
1st STREET

TEMPORARY

PEDESTRIAN
CROSS WALK, (2)

STOP SIGNS AND

BARRICADES
(TYP.)
Scale: N.T.S.

SITE LOGISTICS PLAN - CIVIL COORDINATION
1 Date
SLP-2
Project number
Drawn by
Checked by

GENERALPLAN
9271
Project Name: NFS
Client Name: -
01/30/25
DG
GE
N.T.S
No.

Description
Date

NAPA FIRST STREET HOTEL &

NAPA, CA
FOR Approval

BRANDED RESIDENTIAL
www.buildgc.com
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434
http://www.pacific-structures.com/
160 S. Van Ness
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone: 415.970.5434

TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK,
(2) STOP SIGNS & BARRICADES

FIRST STREET NAPA

PHASE II REDEVELOPMENT
34 During construction, temporary pedestrian
crosswalks and designations will be provided to
ease pedestrian access around the site.

LEGEND:

IILL
~
KIHHWR
I
GHT
1053
ATTACHMENT 23
First Street Napa Phase II Project

Initial Study/
Addendum

FCS

APPENDIX B:

DNSP Capacity Analysis
ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23

APPENDIX B
:

COMPARISON OF

DEVELOPMENT

ANTICIPATED IN
DNSP
EIR

WITH ACTUAL

DEVELOPMENT TO DATE AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT

The
Downtown Napa Specific Plan (
DNSP
)

established six land use designations and zoning districts within the DNSP
Area
.

Within these six districts, putting aside parks and open space uses, the DNSP permits four broad classes of land uses:

residential uses, hotel and lodging uses, office uses, and other commercial uses grouped into the category of “retail” uses.

While each of these four categories contains
numerous more specific uses, these four categories effectively capture the broad range of land uses that are permitted by the DNSP
.

The DNSP was not intended to, and does not, establish any specific or numerical limits on any of the four

land use categories. Rather, it was intended to allow flexibility among the various use categories to allow Downtown development to respond to changing financial and market conditions.

T
he DNSP does not
contain any specific limits or caps on the number of residential units ,

hotel rooms, or the total square
footage of office or commercial uses allowed in the DNSP Area
.

When the City adopted the DNSP, it was required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the potential environmental effects from development of the DNSP Area. In the absence of specific numerical limits on the various types of develo pment allowed in the DNSP Area, the authors of the
DNSP
Environmental Impact Report (
EIR
)

were required to make certain assumptions about how the Downtown area would be developed and how much development would occur in each land use category.

These assumpt
ions were used to describe the DNSP “project” that was evaluated in the DNSP EIR. The authors assumed, for purposes of the environmental analysis, that the following levels of development would occur in the DNSP

Area:

Table
1 : Development Assumptions Used in DNSP EIR

Residential

Lodging/Hotel Rooms

Office Space

Retail Space

627 units

303 rooms

470,620 Square Feet

108,590 square feet

As noted above, these assumptions were made solely for the purpose of environmental review and did not

and do not establish any limits or caps on the amount of development that the City may approve in the DNSP Area in any given use category.

Consistent with CEQA’s requirements
that
an EIR analyze
alternatives to the project, t
he DNSP EIR also evaluated an “
Additional Hotel Alternative
.”
This alternative
wa
s similar to the
DNSP

project
, except with a 167,000 square
f
oo
t
reduction in office

space to offset
an

addition
al

200

hotel

rooms

(for a total assumed 503 rooms)
, and
all other uses
,

which would remain the

same.

The DNSP EIR concluded that

all the
less
-
than
-
significant

impacts under the

DNSP

project analysis
would remain less

than

significant under this alternative.

Since the adoption of the DNSP, actual development in the DNSP
Area has not conformed to the DNSP

EIR
“project”
assumptions in each category. In

most categories (i.e., residential units, office space, and retail

space), actual development has lagged far behind the assumptions used in the DNSP EIR, and in one case (hotel rooms), actual development has exceeded the assumption used in the DNSP EIR.

ATTACHMENT 23
CEQA concerns itself with the environmental effects from proposed development on the existing environment, referred to in CEQA parlance as the “environmental baseline”, without regard to the

types of

uses that are proposed.

A
ctual development in the

DNSP
Area has
not conform
ed

to the assumptions
used in the DNSP EIR. Because of this
,
the DNSP EIR development buildout
assumptions
do

not reflect
the existing physical conditions in the

DNSP Area
. As a result, they should not be used to evaluate the
potential effects from new development propos
als in

the
DNSP
Area

because if they were, the
evaluation
would produce a false picture of the new development’s effects on the environment . Instead,
the
environmental analysis for proposed new development in the DNSP Area

should recognize the actual
development trends that have occurred in the

DNSP Area

and account for the facts that (a)

residential,
office, and retail development in the
DNSP Area

is far less than what was anticipated in the DNSP EIR,
and (b) hotel and lodging development has exceeded what was anticipated in the DNSP EIR. Adjusting the environmental baseline to reflect the actual levels of development in the DNSP Area

allows
the potential
environmental effects of a new

project
to
be accurately assessed.

A
ft
er an accurate assessment of the
new
project’s environmental effects has been completed, the Lead Agency can

then determin
e
whether or
not the
new
project’s environmental effects are within the scope of the significant effects from DNSP
buildout described in
the DNSP EIR.

To
account for the fact that actual development in the
DNSP Area

has not conformed to the
development
assumptions used in the DNSP EIR, the difference between the DNSP EIR’s assumptions and the actual levels of development that have occurred

can be calculated for each land use category
.

Table 2 below
shows, for each land use category, the development assumption used in the DNSP EIR, the actual amount of

new
development that has occurred, the amount of new development that has been approved but not
yet built
, and the amount of new development that can still be approved before reaching the assumption used in the DNSP EIR
.

Table
2 :

DNSP EIR D
evelopment
Assumptions v. Actual Development in
DNSP Area

Category

DNSP EIR

Assumptions

Approved

Projects
1 Proposed

Project

Approved Plus
Project

Difference
2 Residential

627 units

100 units

78 units

178 units

-
449

units

Hotel

303 rooms

501 rooms

161 rooms

662 rooms

359 rooms

Office

470,600

sq. ft
.

51,634 sq. ft
.

0 sq. ft
.

51,634 sq. ft.

-
418,966

sq. ft
.

Retail

108,590 sq. ft
.

11,432 sq. ft.

30,000 sq. ft
.

67,158 sq. ft.

-
67,158

sq. ft
.

Notes:

All values are approximate.

Bold

text denotes negative value.

1 Includes
all
project
s

approved
after DNSP adoption
, including built projects and unbuilt projects
.

2 Calculated by subtracting total of Approved Projects and the proposed
Project from number of projects assumed in the DNSP EIR.

Sources:

City of Napa. 2012. Downtown Napa Specific Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report. Table 3 -
2: Development Capacity
Under the Specific Plan.

City of Napa. 2025.

ATTACHMENT 23
Because actual development in the
DNSP
Area
, even including development of the proposed Project,
remains well below what was anticipated by and evaluated in the DNSP EIR, it is reasonable to assume that the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project would
be within the scope of the
environmental effects described in the DNSP EIR, and no new or more severe environmental effects not described in the DNSP EIR will occur as a result of the proposed Project.

useful
indicator
for comparing the
potential environmental effects from the proposed Project to the environmental
effects identified and described in
the DNSP EIR
is the amount of t
raffic generat
ed by
the
two development scenarios.

In addition to the direct impacts created by additional vehicle traffic (vehicle miles travelled and level
-
of
-
service impacts), traffic generation is a key driver of air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise impacts.

For illustrative purposes,
comparing the relative
increases in t
raffic

under each
scenario
to the
appropriate
baseline assumptions is a reasonable way to evaluate
and compare the
level
of environmental impacts
described in the DNSP EIR to the level of impacts from actual development under the DNSP
,

together with the potential impacts of the proposed Project.

Under the
2035
buildout analysis
,
1 the DSNP EIR
concluded
that implementation of the DNSP would
generate
12,211 new daily vehicle trips.

The increased daily traffic from
DNSP development
since

the

adoption of the DNSP
,

plus
the
anticipated
traffic from approved but not yet built projects,
is 4,229 new
daily trips, which is 35

percent

of the total expected traffic analyzed in the DNSP EIR
, or
7,982
fewer
daily
trips
than was anticipated by the DNSP EIR.

Because the proposed Project would substantially reduce the existing volume of retail development on the Project site, implementation of the proposed Project would decrease the number of daily vehicle trips within the DNSP
Area
.

By removing approximately 46,000 square feet of
existing
retail uses from the
Project site (mostly from closure of the existing Kohl’s department store), daily traffic trips in the DNSP Area
would be reduced by approximately 1,882 daily trips
,
bringing the total number of daily trips
generated by uses in the DNSP
Area
to 3,581, which is 8,630 fewer trips and only 29

percent
of the total
number of daily trips anticipated by the DNSP EIR.
2 Based on these traffic figures, it is reasonable to
assume that the potential environmental impacts relating to traffic from the proposed Project ,

plus all
other

approved development in the DNSP
Area,

would be well within the scope of the same impacts as
described in the DNSP EIR.

As shown in Table
3 , above, the
proposed
Project
would add
161 hotel rooms

and
78 residential units

to
the DNSP
Area
.

With respect to retail uses, although the

proposed

Project
would
develop approximately
30,000 square feet of

new retail uses, it also involves the closure of approximately 76,000 square feet of existing retail uses, resulting in a net loss of 46,000 square feet of retail uses on the Project site
.
3 Although the
proposed
Project

would increase

the number of hotel rooms in excess of the number of

1 W
-
Trans. 2025. First Street Napa Phase II VMT and Trip Generation Assessment. May 1.

2 Ibid.

3 Parkway Plaza is located on the Property, which, including Kohl’s, contains 76,000 square feet of retail uses. The proposed Project adds 30,000 square feet of new retail and demolishes the 76,000 square feet of existing retail.

This is a net decrease
of 46,000 square feet. When combined with the 11,430 square feet of net retail growth since adoption of the DNSP, th e
proposed Project will
result in an overall decrease of 34,570 square feet o
f

retail use
s

within the DNSP

as compared to
existing conditions.

ATTACHMENT 23
rooms anticipated with the prior hotel projects, with the 449 remaining residential units, the 418,966 square feet of office capacity
,

and increase in retail capacity to 143,158 square feet, the environmental impacts from the developed and entitled projects plus the proposed
Project’s impacts
would be

less than
anticipated in the 2035 DNSP EIR buildout analysis.

With the
proposed
Project, the number of hotel
rooms
,
commercial development (office and retail)
,

and housing

would also remain
less than the amoun
t
of development analyzed in the
DNSP EIR’s Additional Hotel Alternative analysis
.

Following the reduction in demand for office space that occurred during and after the COVID -
19 Pandemic, it is unlikely that 418,966 square feet of office capacity (or the 251,996 square feet of office capacity under the DNSP EIR’s Additional Hotel Alterna
tive analysis) would be permitted or built before
2035.

This trend is reflected in Table
s

2 and 3
,
which show that
only 4

percent

of the DNSP EIR’s
analyzed office capacity has been constructed and only an additional 7

percent

has been entitled since
2012.

Additionally, under the DNSP and zoning adopted in conjunction with the DNSP
, the
Project site
could
accommodate up to
585,882
square
f
eet

of commercial uses, such as office and retail
, and/or

156

housing units or
a
combination thereof. The proposed
161 hotel rooms, 78 residential units
,

and decrease
in the amount of retail by 46,000 square feet

is less than the site
-
specific capacity in the DNSP for the
Property.

Based on all the foregoing, it is reasonable to assume that the proposed Project would
not result in any
new significant environmental effects that were not identified and addressed in the DNSP EIR, or substantially increase the severity of any significant effects that were previously identified in the DNSP EIR.

Therefore, the proposed Project
is within the scope of the project that was evaluated in the DNSP EIR.

ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23
First Street Napa Phase II Project

Initial Study/
Addendum

FCS

APPENDIX C:

Air Quality Screening Analysis
ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23
Air Quality
, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Energy

Supporting
Information

Table of Contents

BAAQMD Screening Report
–

Operational
Emissions

1 BAAQMD Screening Report
–

Stationary Sources

Surrounding Project Site

2 BAAQMD
Screening Report for Roadway and Rails

Project Site

3 ATTACHMENT 23
Multi-land Use Screening Tool Overview
Instructions
Land Use Category
Land Use Type
Unit
Project
Land Use Size
Has Overlapping
Construction
Phases?
Residential
Condo-Townhouse Hi-Rise
DU

78.0 FALSE
Residential
Apartments High Rise
DU
161.0
FALSE
Retail
Regional Shopping Center
KSF

30.0 FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
Developed by
Last updated:
5/6/2022
This screening tool helps to determine whether the daily construction or operational emissions associated with a proposed land use development project with multiple land use types would exceed BAAQMD's average daily thresholds.

Exceeds Construction Threshold?
Exceeds Operational Threshold?
BAAQMD's Recommendation
Use the drop-down menus to select the land use category and land use type for each type of land use included in the project. Enter the proposed size of each land use based on the default units that are autopopulated in column D.

The tool will estimate whether the project may exceed the construction thresholds, operational thresholds, or both, and whether further analysis is needed before making a significance determination.

This tool will not work for projects which have construction-related activities overlapping with operational activities, and vice versa.

Construction and Operation Screening Tool
NO
NO
Further Analysis Not Required
B
AY
A
REA
A
l
R
01/
ALl
T
Y
E:7
MAN

AGEMENT
DI
STRIC
T
n
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
□
ATTACHMENT 23
Facility ID
Facility Name
Address
City
State
Zip
County
Latitude
Longitude
Source Details
Cancer Risk
Chronic Hazard Index
PM 2.5
13492
Pacific Bell
1300 Clay Street
Napa
CA
94558
Napa

38.3 -122.29
Generator

7.12 0

0.01 13992
Napa County Public Works
1125 3rd Street
Napa
CA
94559
Napa

38.3 -122.28
Generator

0.01 0
0 13993
Napa County Public Works
1195 3rd Street
Napa
CA
94559
Napa

38.3 -122.29
Generator

7.01 0

0.01 18913
Napa Square Owner NY LLC
1401 1st Street
Napa
CA
94559
Napa

38.3 -122.29
Generator

5.57 0

0.01 18950

AUL CORP
1250 Main Street
Napa
CA
94559
Napa

38.3 -122.29
Generator
0 0
0 19478
River Front Construction LLC
588 Main St Bldg A
Napa
CA
94559
Napa

38.3 -122.28
Generator

1.92 0
0 19851
Judicial Council of California JCC 28-A1
1111 3rd Street
Napa
CA
94559
Napa

38.3 -122.28
Generator

2.31 0
0 200573
Lodgeworks
1230 1ST ST
Napa
CA
94559
Napa

38.3 -122.29
Generator

2.74 0
0 ATTACHMENT 23
UTMX
UTMY
Road Cancer Risk
Road Chronic HI
Road PM2.5
Rail Cancer Risk
Rail Chronic HI
Rail PM2.5
562431
4239244

20.69141006

0.038996

0.232239
-3.40E+38
-3.40E+38
-3.40E+38
Data Provided By: BAAQMD as raster file (.tif) datasets Roadway Screening Tool - Cancer Risk Last Updated December 8 2022 Roadway Screening Tool - Chronic Hazard Last Updated December 8 2022 Roadway Screening Tool - PM2.5 Last Updated December 8 2022 Rail Screening Tool - Cancer Risk Last Updated January 30 2023 Rail Screening Tool - Chronic Hazard Last Updated January 30 2023 Rail Screening Tool - PM2.5 Last Updated January 30 2023 ATTACHMENT 23
First Street Napa Phase II Project

Initial Study/
Addendum

FCS

APPENDIX D:

Biological Resources Supporting
Information
ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23
Species
Element Code
Federal Status
State Status
Global Rank
State Rank
Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Accipiter cooperii
Cooper's hawk
ABNKC12040
None
None
G5
S4
WL
Acipenser medirostris pop. 1
green sturgeon - southern DPS
AFCAA01031
Threatened
None
G2T1
S1
SSC
Actinemys marmorata
northwestern pond turtle
ARAAD02031
Proposed
Threatened
None
G2
SNR
SSC
Adela oplerella
Opler's longhorn moth
IILEE0G040
None
None
G2
S2
Agelaius tricolor
tricolored blackbird
ABPBXB0020
None
Threatened
G1G2
S2
SSC
Agrostis hendersonii
Henderson's bent grass
PMPOA040K0
None
None
G2Q
S2

3.2 Allium peninsulare var. franciscanum
Franciscan onion
PMLIL021R1
None
None
G4G5T2
S2
1B.2
Amorpha californica var. napensis
Napa false indigo
PDFAB08012
None
None
G4T2
S2
1B.2
Amsinckia lunaris
bent-flowered fiddleneck
PDBOR01070
None
None
G3
S3
1B.2
Andrena blennospermatis
Blennosperma vernal pool andrenid bee
IIHYM35030
None
None
G2
S1
Antrozous pallidus
pallid bat
AMACC10010
None
None
G4
S3
SSC
Aquila chrysaetos
golden eagle
ABNKC22010
None
None
G5
S3
FP
Arctostaphylos stanfordiana ssp. decumbens
Rincon Ridge manzanita
PDERI041G4
None
None
G3T1
S1
1B.1
Ardea alba
great egret
ABNGA04040
None
None
G5
S4
Ardea herodias
great blue heron
ABNGA04010
None
None
G5
S4
Astragalus claranus
Clara Hunt's milk-vetch
PDFAB0F240
Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
Astragalus tener var. tener
alkali milk-vetch
PDFAB0F8R1
None
None
G2T1
S1
1B.2
Athene cunicularia
burrowing owl
ABNSB10010
None
Candidate
Endangered
G4
S2
SSC
Balsamorhiza macrolepis
big-scale balsamroot
PDAST11061
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Quad IS (Mt. George (3812232) OR Cordelia (3812222) OR Capell Valley (3812242) OR Sonoma (3812234) OR Yountville (3812243) OR Rutherford (3812244) OR Napa (3812233) OR Cuttings Wharf (3812223) OR Sears Point (3812224)) Query Criteria:

Report Printed on Thursday, December 19, 2024

Page 1 of 6 ends

Commercial Version -- Dated December, 1 2024 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Information Expires 6/1/2025
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
ATTACHMENT 23
Species
Element Code
Federal Status
State Status
Global Rank
State Rank
Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Blennosperma bakeri
Sonoma sunshine
PDAST1A010
Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
Bombus caliginosus
obscure bumble bee
IIHYM24380
None
None
G2G3
S1S2
Bombus occidentalis
western bumble bee
IIHYM24252
None
Candidate
Endangered
G3
S1
Bombus pensylvanicus
American bumble bee
IIHYM24260
None
None
G3G4
S2
Branchinecta lynchi
vernal pool fairy shrimp
ICBRA03030
Threatened
None
G3
S3
Brodiaea leptandra
narrow-anthered brodiaea
PMLIL0C022
None
None
G3?
S3?
1B.2
Buteo regalis
ferruginous hawk
ABNKC19120
None
None
G4
S3S4
WL
Buteo swainsoni
Swainson's hawk
ABNKC19070
None
Threatened
G5
S4
Calasellus californicus
An isopod
ICMAL34010
None
None
G2
S3
Carex lyngbyei
Lyngbye's sedge
PMCYP037Y0
None
None
G5
S3
2B.2
Castilleja affinis var. neglecta
Tiburon paintbrush
PDSCR0D013
Endangered
Threatened
G4G5T1T2
S1S2
1B.2
Castilleja ambigua var. meadii
Mead's owls-clover
PDSCR0D404
None
None
G5T1
S1
1B.1
Ceanothus confusus
Rincon Ridge ceanothus
PDRHA04220
None
None
G1
S1
1B.1
Ceanothus divergens
Calistoga ceanothus
PDRHA04240
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Ceanothus purpureus
holly-leaved ceanothus
PDRHA04160
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Ceanothus sonomensis
Sonoma ceanothus
PDRHA04420
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Centromadia parryi ssp. parryi
pappose tarplant
PDAST4R0P2
None
None
G3T2
S2
1B.2
Charadrius nivosus nivosus
western snowy plover
ABNNB03031
Threatened
None
G3T3
S3
SSC
Chloropyron molle ssp. molle
soft salty bird's-beak
PDSCR0J0D2
Endangered
Rare
G2T1
S1
1B.2
Circus hudsonius
northern harrier
ABNKC11011
None
None
G5
S3
SSC
Coastal Brackish Marsh
Coastal Brackish Marsh
CTT52200CA
None
None
G2
S2.1
Report Printed on Thursday, December 19, 2024

Page 2 of 6 ends

Commercial Version -- Dated December, 1 2024 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Information Expires 6/1/2025
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
ATTACHMENT 23
Species
Element Code
Federal Status
State Status
Global Rank
State Rank
Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Coturnicops noveboracensis
yellow rail
ABNME01010
None
None
G4
S2
SSC
Cypseloides niger
black swift
ABNUA01010
None
None
G4
S3
SSC
Danaus plexippus plexippus pop. 1
monarch - California overwintering population
IILEPP2012
Candidate
None
G4T1T2Q
S2
Desmocerus californicus dimorphus
valley elderberry longhorn beetle
IICOL48011
Threatened
None
G3T3
S3
Dicamptodon ensatus
California giant salamander
AAAAH01020
None
None
G2G3
S2S3
SSC
Downingia pusilla
dwarf downingia
PDCAM060C0
None
None
GU
S2
2B.2
Elanus leucurus
white-tailed kite
ABNKC06010
None
None
G5
S3S4
FP
Erethizon dorsatum
North American porcupine
AMAFJ01010
None
None
G5
S3
Erigeron greenei
Greene's narrow-leaved daisy
PDAST3M5G0
None
None
G2?
S2?
1B.2
Eryngium jepsonii
Jepson's coyote-thistle
PDAPI0Z130
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Extriplex joaquinana
San Joaquin spearscale
PDCHE041F3
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Falco peregrinus anatum
American peregrine falcon
ABNKD06071
Delisted
Delisted
G4T4
S3S4
Geothlypis trichas sinuosa
saltmarsh common yellowthroat
ABPBX1201A
None
None
G5T3
S3
SSC
Gonidea angulata
western ridged mussel
IMBIV19010
None
None
G3
S2
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
bald eagle
ABNKC10010
Delisted
Endangered
G5
S3
FP
Hemizonia congesta ssp. congesta
congested-headed hayfield tarplant
PDAST4R0W1
None
None
G5T2
S2
1B.2
Hesperoleucus venustus subditus
southern coastal roach
AFCJB19032
None
None
GNRT2
S2
SSC
Hesperolinon breweri
Brewer's western flax
PDLIN01030
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Hesperolinon sharsmithiae
Sharsmith's western flax
PDLIN010E0
None
None
G2Q
S2
1B.2
Horkelia tenuiloba
thin-lobed horkelia
PDROS0W0E0
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Hydroprogne caspia
Caspian tern
ABNNM08020
None
None
G5
S4
Report Printed on Thursday, December 19, 2024

Page 3 of 6 ends

Commercial Version -- Dated December, 1 2024 -- Biogeographic Data Branch Information Expires 6/1/2025
Selected Elements by Scientific Name
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife
California Natural Diversity Database
ATTACHMENT 23
Species
Element Code
Federal Status
State Status
Global Rank
State Rank
Rare Plant
Rank/CDFW
SSC or FP
Hypomesus transpacificus
Delta smelt
AFCHB01040
Threatened
Endangered
G1
S1
Isocoma arguta
Carquinez goldenbush
PDAST57050
None
None
G1
S1
1B.1
Lasiurus frantzii
western red bat
AMACC05080
None
None
G4
S3
SSC
Lasthenia conjugens
Contra Costa goldfields
PDAST5L040
Endangered
None
G1
S1
1B.1
Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus
California black rail
ABNME03041
None
Threatened
G3T1
S2
FP
Lathyrus jepsonii var. jepsonii
Delta tule pea
PDFAB250D2
None
None
G5T2
S2
1B.2
Legenere limosa
legenere
PDCAM0C010
None
None
G2
S2
1B.1
Leptosiphon jepsonii
Jepson's leptosiphon
PDPLM09140
None
None
G2G3
S2S3
1B.2
Lilaeopsis masonii
Mason's lilaeopsis
PDAPI19030
None
Rare
G2
S2
1B.1
Limnanthes vinculans
Sebastopol meadowfoam
PDLIM02090
Endangered
Endangered
G1
S1
1B.1
Lupinus sericatus
Cobb Mountain lupine
PDFAB2B3J0
None
None
G2?
S2?
1B.2
Melospiza melodia maxillaris
Suisun song sparrow
ABPBXA301K
None
None
G5T3
S2
SSC
Melospiza melodia samuelis
San Pablo song sparrow
ABPBXA301W
None
None
G5T2
S2
SSC
Nannopterum auritum
double-crested cormorant
ABNFD01020
None
None
G5
S4
WL
Navarretia leucocephala ssp. pauciflora
few-flowered navarretia
PDPLM0C0E4
Endangered
Threatened
G4T1
S1
1B.1
Northern Coastal Salt Marsh
Northern Coastal Salt Marsh
CTT52110CA
None
None
G3
S3.2
Northern Vernal Pool
Northern Vernal Pool
CTT44100CA
None
None
G2
S2.1
Nycticorax nycticorax
black-crowned night heron
ABNGA11010
None
None
G5
S4
Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus pop. 8
steelhead - central California coast DPS
AFCHA0209G
Threatened
None
G5T3Q
S3
SSC
Penstemon newberryi var. sonomensis
Sonoma beardtongue
PDSCR1L483
None
None
G4T3
S3
1B.3
Pogonichthys macrolepidotus
Sacramento splittail
AFCJB34020
None
None
G3
S3
SSC
Report Printed on Thursday, December 19, 2024

Page 4 of 6 ends

3.1 Rallus obsoletus obsoletus
California Ridgway's rail
ABNME05011
Endangered
Endangered
G3T1
S2
FP
Rana boylii pop. 1
foothill yellow-legged frog - north coast DPS
AAABH01051
None
None
G3T4
S4
SSC
Rana draytonii
California red-legged frog
AAABH01022
Threatened
None
G2G3
S2S3
SSC
Reithrodontomys raviventris
salt-marsh harvest mouse
AMAFF02040
Endangered
Endangered
G1G2
S3
FP
Rhynchospora californica
California beaked-rush
PMCYP0N060
None
None
G1
S1
1B.1
Riparia riparia
bank swallow
ABPAU08010
None
Threatened
G5
S3
Sagittaria sanfordii
Sanford's arrowhead
PMALI040Q0
None
None
G3
S3
1B.2
Serpentine Bunchgrass
Serpentine Bunchgrass
CTT42130CA
None
None
G2
S2.2
Sidalcea hickmanii ssp. napensis
Napa checkerbloom
PDMAL110A6
None
None
G2T1
S1
1B.1
Sidalcea keckii
Keck's checkerbloom
PDMAL110D0
Endangered
None
G2
S2
1B.1
Sorex ornatus sinuosus
Suisun shrew
AMABA01103
None
None
G5T1T2Q
S1S2
SSC
Speyeria callippe callippe
callippe silverspot butterfly
IILEPJ6091
Endangered
None
G5T1
S1
Speyeria zerene sonomensis
Sonoma zerene fritillary
IILEPJ6083
None
None
G5T1
S1
Spirinchus thaleichthys pop. 2
longfin smelt - San Francisco Bay-Delta DPS
AFCHB03040
Endangered
Threatened
G5TNRQ
S1
Streptanthus hesperidis
green jewelflower
PDBRA2G510
None
None
G2G3
S2S3
1B.2
Stygobromus cowani
Cowan's amphipod
ICMAL05D70
None
None
G1
S1
Symphyotrichum lentum
Suisun Marsh aster
PDASTE8470
None
None
G2
S2
1B.2
Syncaris pacifica
California freshwater shrimp
ICMAL27010
Endangered
Endangered
G2
S2
Taricha rivularis
red-bellied newt
AAAAF02020
None
None
G2
S2
SSC
Taxidea taxus
American badger
AMAJF04010
None
None
G5
S3
SSC
Report Printed on Thursday, December 19, 2024

Page 5 of 6 ends

Page 6 of 6 ends

SOCIETY
CNPS
Rare
Plant
lnvento[Y.

Search
Results
10 matches
found
.

Click
on
scientific
name
for
details
Search
Criteria:

Fed
List
is
one
of
[FE
:

FT
:

FC
:

FD]
or
State
List
is
one
of
[CE:CT:CR
:

CC
:

CD]
,
S
Rank
is
one
of
[S1
:

S2:S3
:

S4].
9-Quad
include
[3812232:3812222:3812242
:
3812234:3812243
:
3812244
:
3812233:3812223
:
3812224]
CA
RARE
.a.

SCIENTIFIC
COMMON

BLOOMING
FED
STATE
GLOBAL
STATE
PLANT
CA
DATE
NAME
NAME
FAMILY

LIFEFORM
PERIOD

LIST LIST
RANK

RANK RANK

ENDEMIC
ADDED
PHOTO
Astragalus
Clara
Hunt's
Fabaceae
annual
herb
Mar-May
FE
CE
G1
S1
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
claranus
milk-vetch
01-01
No
Photo
Available
BlennosfJ.erma
Sonoma
Asteraceae
annual
herb
Mar-May
FE
CE
G1
S1
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
bakeri
sunshine
01-01
No
Photo
Available
Castillejil.

Tiburon
Orobanchaceae
perennial
herb
Apr-Jun
FE
CT
G4G5T1T2
S1S2
1B
.
2 Yes
1974-
affinis
var.
paintbrush
(hemiparasitic)
01-01
No
Photo
neglecta
Available
Chlorogyfon
soft
salty
Orobanchaceae
annual
herb
Jun-Nov
FE
CR
G2T1
S1
1B
.
2 Yes
1974-
mo//essP-,.
bird's-beak
(hemiparasitic)
01-01
mo/le
©2014
John
Doyen
Lasthenia
Contra
Costa
Asteraceae
annual
herb
Mar-Jun
FE
None
G1
S1
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
conjygens
goldfields
01-01
©
2013
Neal
Kramer
Li/aeofJ.sis
Mason's
Apiaceae
perennial
Apr-Nov
None
CR
G2
S2
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
masonii
lilaeopsis
rhizomatous
07-01
No
Photo
herb
Available
Limnanthes
Sebastopol
Limnanthaceae
annual
herb
Apr-May
FE
CE
G1
S1
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
vincu/ans
meadowfoam
01-01
©2015
Vernon
Smith
Navarretia
few-flowered
Polemoniaceae
annual
herb
May-Jun
FE
CT
G4T1
S1
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
/eucoceu_hala
navarretia
01-01
SSP...,...fJ.8UCif!ora
©2013
Jake
Ruygt
Sidalcea
keckii
Keck's
Malvaceae
annual
herb
Apr-
FE
None
G2
S2
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
checkerbloom
May(Jun)
01-01
No
Photo
Available
ATTACHMENT 23
Trifolium
amoenum
two-fork
clover
Showing
1 to
10 of
10 entries
Suggested
Citation
:

Fabaceae
annual
herb
Apr-Jun
FE
None
G1
S1
1B
.
1 Yes
1974-
01-01
No
Photo
Available
California
Native
Plant
Society,
Rare
Plant
Program
.
2024.

Rare
Plant
Inventory
(online
edition,
v9.5).

Website
https
:
//www
.
rareplants.cnps.org
[accessed
19 December
2024]
.

ATTACHMENT 23
IPaC
U.S.

Fish
&
Wildlife
Service
IPaC
resource
list
This
report
is
an
automatically
generated
list
of
species
and
other
resources
such
as
critical
habitat
(collectively
referred
to
as
trust
resources)
under
the
U.S.

Fish
and
Wildlife
Service's
(USFWS)
jurisdiction
that
are
known
or
expected
to
be
on
or
near
the
project
area
referenced
below.

The
list
may
also
include
trust
resources
that
occur
outside
of
the
project
area,
but
that
could
potentially
be
directly
or
indirectly
affected
by
activities
in
the
project
area.

However,
determining
the
likelihood
and
extent
of
effects
a
project
may
have
on
trust
resources
typically
requires
gathering
additional
site-specific
(e.g.,
vegetation/species
surveys)
and
project-specific
(e.g.,
magnitude
and
timing
of
proposed
activities)
information.

Below
is
a
summary
of
the
project
information
you
provided
and
contact
information
for
the
USFWS
office(s)
with
jurisdiction
in
the
defined
project
area.

Please
read
the
introduction
to
each
section
that
follows
(Endangered
Species,
Migratory
Birds,
USFWS
Facilities,
and
NWI
Wetlands)
for
additional
information
applicable
to
the
trust
resources
addressed
in
that
section.

Location
Napa
County,
California
Local
office
Sacramento
Fish
And
Wildlife
Office
\.
(916)
414-6600
161
(916)
414-6713
ATTACHMENT 23
Federal
Building
2800
Cottage
Way,
Room
W-2605
Sacramento,
CA
95825-1846
ATTACHMENT 23
Endangered
species
This
resource
list
is
for
informational
purposes
only
and
does
not
constitute
an
analysis
of
project
level
impacts.

The
primary
information
used
to
generate
this
list
is
the
known
or
expected
range
of
each
species
.

Additional
areas
of
influence
(AOI)
for
species
are
also
considered
.

An
AOI
includes
areas
outside
of
the
species
range
if
the
species
could
be
indirectly
affected
by
activities
in
that
area
(e
.
g
.
,
placing
a
dam
upstream
of
a
fish
population
even
if
that
fish
does
not
occur
at
the
dam
site,
may
indirectly
impact
the
species
by
reducing
or
eliminating
water
flow
downstream)
.

Because
species
can
move,
and
site
conditions
can
change,
the
species
on
this
list
are
not
guaranteed
to
be
found
on
or
near
the
project
area.

To
fully
determine
any
potential
effects
to
species,
additional
site-specific
and
project-specific
information
is
often
required
.

Section
7 of
the
Endangered
Species
Act
requires
Federal
agencies
to
"request
of
the
Secretary
information
whether
any
species
which
is
listed
or
proposed
to
be
listed
may
be
present
in
the
area
of
such
proposed
action"
for
any
project
that
is
conducted,
permitted
,
funded,
or
licensed
by
any
Federal
agency
.

A
letter
from
the
local
office
and
a
species
list
which
fulfills
this
requirement
can
only
be
obtained
by
requesting
an
official
species
list
from
either
the
Regulatory
Review
section
in
IPaC
(see
directions
below)
or
from
the
local
field
office
directly
.

For
project
evaluations
that
require
USFWS
concurrence/review,
please
return
to
the
IPaC
website
and
request
an
official
species
list
by
doing
the
following
:
1 .

Draw
the
project
location
and
click
CONTINUE.

2. Click
DEFINE
PROJECT.

3. Log
in
(if
directed
to
do
so).

4. Provide
a
name
and
description
for
your
project.

5. Click

REQUEST

SPECIES
LIST.

Listed
species
l
and
their
critical
habitats
are
managed
by
the
Ecological
Services
Program
of
the
U.S.

Fish
and
Wildlife
Service
(USFWS)
and
the
fisheries
division
of
the
National
Oceanic
and
Atmospheric
Administration
(NOAA
Fisheries
i
).

Species
and
critical
habitats
under
the
sole
responsibility
of
NOAA
Fisheries
are
not
shown
on
this
list.

Please
contact
NOAA
Fisheries
for
~P-ecies
under
their
jurisdiction
.

1. Species
listed
under
the
Endangered
SP-ecies
Act
are
threatened
or
endangered;
IPaC
also
shows
species
that
are
candidates,
or
proposed,
for
listing.

See
the
listing
status
P-ag~
for
more
information.

IPaC
only
shows
species
that
are
regulated
by
USFWS
(see
FAQ).

ATTACHMENT 23

2. NOAA
Fisheries
,
also
known
as
the
National
Marine
Fisheries
Service
(NMFS),
is
an
office
of
the
National
Oceanic
and
Atmospheric
Administration
within
the
Department
of
Commerce.

The
following
species
are
potentially
affected
by
activities
in
this
location:

Mammals
NAME
Salt
Marsh
Harvest
Mouse
Reithrodontomys
raviventris
Wherever
found
No
critical
habitat
has
been
designated
for
this
species
.
httf2s:/
/ecos.fws.gov/eq2/sP-ecies/613
Birds
NAME
California
Least
Tern
Sternu
l
a
anti
ll
ar
u
m
brown
i
Wherever
found
No
critical
habitat
has
been
designated
for
this
species.
httf2s://ecos.fws.gov/eq~lsP-ecies/81
04 Northern
Spotted
Owl
St
r
ix
occ
i
den
t
a
li
s
caurina
Wherever
found
There
is
final
critical
habitat
for
this
species
.

Your
location
does
not
overlap
the
critical
habitat.
httP-s
:
//ecos.fws.
go
v/eq~lsP-
e
ci
e
s/1123
Reptiles
NAME
Northwestern
Pond
Turtle
Act
i
ne
m
ys
m
a
r
mo
r
ata
Wherever
fo
u
nd
No
critical
habitat
has
been
designated
for
this
species
.
httP-s://ecos.fws
.
gov/ecP-ISP-ecies/1111
Amphibians
NAME
STATUS
Endangered
STATUS
Endangered
Threatened
S
T
A
T
US
Proposed
Threatened
STATUS
ATTACHMENT 23
California
Red-legged
Frog
Rana
draytonii
Wherever
found
There
is
final
critical
habitat
for
this
species.

Your
location
does
not
overlap
the
critical
habitat.
https:/
/
ecos.
fws.gov
I
ecp/speci
es/2891
Insects
NAME
Monarch
Butterfly
Danaus
plexippus
Wherever
found
There
is
proposed
critical
habitat
for
this
species.
httfJs:/
/
ecos.
fws.gov/eqJISP-ecies/97
43 Crustaceans
NAME
Conservancy
Fairy
Shrimp
Branchinecta
conservatio
Wherever
found
There
is
final
critical
habitat
for
this
species.

Your
location
does
not
overlap
the
critical
habitat.
httQs
:
//ecos
.
fws.gov/ecQISQecies/8246
Flowering
Plants
NAME
Contra
Costa
Goldfields
L
asthen
i
a
co
nju
gens
Wherever
found
There
is
final
critical
habitat
for
this
species
.

Your
location
does
not
overlap
the
critical
habitat.
httQs:/
/ecos.
fws.gov/ecQISP-ecies/7058
Showy
Indian
Clover
Trifolium
amoenum
Wherever
found
No
critical
habitat
has
been
designated
for
this
species.
httQs:/
I
ecos.
fws
.
gov
I
ecQI
SQeci
es/6459
Threatened
STATUS
Proposed
Threatened
STA
TU
S
Endangered
S
T
A
TU
S
Endangered
Endangered
ATTACHMENT 23
Critical
habitats
Potential
effects
to
critical
habitat(s)
in
this
location
must
be
analyzed
along
with
the
endangered
species
themselves.

There
are
no
critical
habitats
at
this
location.

You
are still
required
to
determine
if
your
project(s)
may
have
effects
on
all
above
listed
species.

Bald
&
Golden
Eagles
There
are
no
documented
cases
of
eagles
being
present
at
this
location.

However,
if
you
believe
eagles
may
be
using
your
site,
please
reach
out
to
the
local
Fish
and
Wildlife
Service
office.

Additional
information
can
be
found
using
the
following
links:
•
Eagle
Management
https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
•
Measures
for
avoiding
and
minimizing
impacts
to
birds
https://www.fws.gov/libra
r
y:/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take migratorY.-birds
•
Nationwide
conservation
measures
for
birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/fi
l
es/documents/nationwide-standard-conservation
measures.pdf
•
Supplemental
Information
for
Migratory
Birds
and
Eagles
in
IPaC
https://www.fws.gov/media/supp
l
emental-information-migratory:-birds-and-bald-and
golden-eag
l
es-may'.-occur-project-action
Bald
and
Golden
Eagle
information
is
not
available
at
this
time
What
does
IPaC
use
to
generate
the
potential
presence
of
bald
and
golden
eagles
in
my
specified
location?
The
potential
for
eagle
presence
is
derived
from
data
provided
by
the
Avian
Knowledge
Network
(AKN).
.

The
AKN
data
is
based
on
a
growing
collection
of
survey,
banding,
and
citizen
science
datasets
and
is
queried
and
filtered
to
return
a
list
of
those
birds
reported
as
occurring
in
the
10km
grid
cell(s)
which
your
project
ATTACHMENT 23
intersects,
and
that
have
been
identified
as
warranting
special
attention
because
they
are
a
BCC
species
in
that
area,
an
eagle
(fg
gle
Act
requirements
may
apply).

To
see
a
list
of
all
birds
potentially
present
in
your
project
area,
please
visit
the
Ragid
Avian
Information
Locator
(RAIL)
Too
l.

What
does
IPaC
use
to
generate
the
probability
of
presence
graphs
of
bald
and
golden
eagles
in
my
specified
location?
The
Migratory
Bird
Resource
List
is
comprised
of
USFWS
Birds
of
Conservation
Concern
(BC().
and
other
species
that
may
warrant
special
attention
in
your
project
location.

The
migratory
bird
list
generated
for
your
project
is
derived
from
data
provided
by
the
Avian
Knowledgg_
Network
(AKN).
.

The
AKN
data
is
based
on
a
growing
collection
of
survey,
banding,
and
citizen
science
datasets
and
is
queried
and
filtered
to
return
a
list
of
those
birds
reported
as
occurring
in
the
10km
grid
cell(s)
which
your
project
intersects,
and
that
have
been
identified
as
warranting
special
attention
because
they
are
a
BCC
species
in
that
area,
an
eagle
(
Eagle
Act
requirements
may
apply),
or
a
species
that
has
a
particular
vulnerability
to
offshore
activities
or
development.

Again,
the
Migratory
Bird
Resource
list
includes
only
a
subset
of
birds
that
may
occur
in
your
project
area.

It
is
not
representative
of
all
birds
that
may
occur
in
your
project
area.

To
get
a
list
of
all
birds
potentially
present
in
your
project
area,
please
visit
the
Ragid
Avian
Information
Locator
(RAIL)
Tool.

What
if
I
have
eagles
on
my
list?
If
your
project
has
the
potential
to
disturb
or
kill
eagles,
you
may
need
to
obtain
a
permit
to
avoid
violating
the
Eagle
Act
should
such
impacts
occur.

Please
contact
your
local
Fish
and
Wildlife
Service
Field
Office
if
you
have
questions.

Migratory
birds
Certain
birds
are
protected
under
the
Migratory
Bird
Treaty
Act
l
and
the
Bald
and
Golden
Eagle
Protection
Act
Z
.

Any
person
or
organization
who
plans
or
conducts
activities
that
may
result
in
impacts
to
migratory
birds,
eagles,
and
their
habitats
should
follow
appropriate
regulations
and
consider
implementing appropriate
conservation
measures,
as
described
below.

1. The
MigratorY.

Birds
TreatY.

Act
of
1918.

2. The
Bald
and
Golden
Eagle
Protection
Act
of
1940.

Additional
information
can
be
found
using
the
following
links:
•
Eagle
Management
https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management
•
Measures
for
avoiding
and
minimizing
impacts
to
birds
https://www.fws.gov/librar_y_/collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take migratorY.-birds
•
Nationwide
conservation
measures
for
birds
https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf ATTACHMENT 23
•
Supplemental
Information
for
Migratory
Birds
and
Eagles
in
IPaC
https://www.fws.gov/media/suP-plemental-information-migratO[Y--birds-and-bald -
and
golden-eagl
es-maY.-occu
r-project-action
Migratory
bird
information
is
not
available
at
this
time
Tell
me
more
about
conservation
measures
I
can
implement
to
avoid
or
minimize
impacts
to
migratory
birds
.

Nationw
i
de
Conservat
i
on
Measures
describes
measures
that
can
help
avoid
and
minimize
impacts
to
all
birds
at
any
location
year
round.

Implementation
of
these
measures
is
particularly
important
when
birds
are
most
likely
to
occur
in
the
project
area
.

When
birds
may
be
breeding
in
the
area,
identifying
the
locations
of
any
active
nests
and
avoiding
their
destruction
is
a
very
helpful
impact
minimization
measure.

To
see
when
birds
are
most
likely
to
occur
and
be
breeding
in
your
project
area,
view
the
Probability
of
Presence
Summary.

Additional
measures
or
P-ermits
may
be
advisable
depending
on
the
type
of
activity
you
are
conducting
and
the
type
of
infrastructure
or
bird
species
present
on
your
project
site.

What
does
IPaC
use
to
generate
the
list
of
migratory
birds
that
potentially
occur
in
my
specified
location?
The
Migratory
Bird
Resource
List
is
comprised
of
USFWS
Birds
of
Conservation
Concern
(BC().
and
other
species
that
may
warrant
special
attention
in
your
project
location.

The
migratory
bird
list
generated
for
your
project
is
derived
from
data
provided
by
the
Avian
Knowledgg
Network
(AKN).
.

The
AKN
data
is
based
on
a
growing
collection
of
survey,
banding,
and
citizen
science
datasets
and
is
queried
and
filtered
to
return
a
list
of
those
birds
reported
as
occurring
in
the
10km
grid
cell(s)
which
your
project
intersects,
and
that
have
been
identified
as
warranting
special
attention
because
they
are
a
BCC
species
in
that
area,
an
eagle
(
Eagle
Act
requirements
may
apply),
or
a
species
that
has
a
particular
vulnerability
to
offshore
activities
or
development.

Again,
the
Migratory
Bird
Resource
list
includes
only
a
subset
of
birds
that
may
occur
in
your
project
area.

It
is
not
representative
of
all
birds
that
may
occur
in
your
project
area.

To
get
a
list
of
all
birds
potentially
present
in
your
project
area,
please
visit
the
RaP-id
Avian
Information
Locator
(RAIL)
Tool.

What
does
IPaC
use
to
generate
the
probability
of
presence
graphs
for
the
migratory
birds
potentially
occurring
in
my
specified
location?
The
probability
of
presence
graphs
associated
with
your
migratory
bird
list
are
based
on
data
provided
by
the
Avian
Knowledge
Network
(AKNJ
.

This
data
is
derived
from
a
growing
collection
of
survey.
banding,
and
citizen
science
datasets
.

Probability
of
presence
data
is
continuously
being
updated
as
new
and
better
information
becomes
available.

To
learn
more
about
how
the
probability
of
presence
graphs
are
produced
and
how
to
interpret
them,
go
the
Probability
of
Presence
Summary
and
then
click
on
the
"Tell
me
about
these
graphs"
link.

How
do
I
know
if
a
bird
is
breeding,
wintering
or
migrating
in
my
area?
ATTACHMENT 23
To
see
what
part
of
a
particular
bird's
range
your
project
area
falls
within
(i.e.
breeding,
wintering,
migrating
or
year-round),
you
may
query
your
location
using
the
RAIL
Tool
and
look
at
the
range
maps
provided
for
birds
in
your
area
at
the
bottom
of
the
profiles
provided
for
each
bird
in
your
results.

If
a
bird
on
your
migratory
bird
species
list
has
a
breeding
season
associated
with
it,
if
that
bird
does
occur
in
your
project
area,
there
may
be
nests
present
at
some
point
within
the
timeframe
specified
.

If
"Breeds
elsewhere"
is
indicated,
then
the
bird
likely
does
not
breed
in
your
project
area
.

What
are
the
levels
of
concern
for
migratory
birds?
Migratory
birds
delivered
through
IPaC
fall
into
the
following
distinct
categories
of
concern:

1. "BCC
Rangewide"
birds
are
Birds
of
Conservation
Concern
(BCC)
that
are
of
concern
throughout
their
range
anywhere
within
the
USA
(including
Hawaii,
the
Pacific
Islands,
Puerto
Rico,
and
the
Virgin
Islands);

2. "BCC
-
BCR"
birds
are
BCCs
that
are
of
concern
only
in
particular
Bird
Conservation
Regions
(BCRs)
in
the
continental
USA;
and

3. "Non-BCC
-
Vulnerable"
birds
are
not
BCC
species
in
your
project
area,
but
appear
on
your
list
either
because
of
the
Eagle
Act
requirements
(for
eagles)
or
(for
non-eagles)
potential
susceptibilities
in
offshore
areas
from
certain
types
of
development
or
activities
(e.g.
offshore
energy
development
or
longline
fishing)
.

Although
it
is
important
to
try
to
avoid
and
minimize
impacts
to
all
birds,
efforts
should
be
made,
in
particular,
to
avoid
and
minimize
impacts
to
the
birds
on
this
list,
especially
eagles
and
BCC
species
of
rangewide
concern
.

For
more
information
on
conservation
measures
you
can
implement
to
help
avoid
and
minimize
migratory
bird
impacts
and
requirements
for
eagles,
please
see
the
FAQs
for
these
topics.

Details
about
birds
that
are
potentially
affected
by
offshore
projects
For
additional
details
about
the
relative
occurrence
and
abundance
of
both
individual
bird
species
and
groups
of
bird
species
within
your
project
area
off
the
Atlantic
Coast,
please
visit
the
Northeast
Ocean
Data
Portal.

The
Portal
also
offers
data
and
information about
other
taxa
besides
birds
that
may
be
helpful
to
you
in
your
project
review.

Alternately,
you
may
download
the
bird
model
results
files
underlying
the
portal
maps
through
the
NOAA
NCCOS
Integrative
Statistical
Modeling
and
Predictive
MaP-.12ing
of
Marine
Bird
Distributions
and
Abundance
on
the
Atlantic
Outer
Continental
Shelf
project
webpage
.

Bird
tracking
data
can
also
provide
additional
details
about
occurrence
and
habitat
use
throughout
the
year,
including
migration.

Models
relying
on
survey
data
may
not
include
this
information.

For
additional
information
on
marine
bird
tracking
data,
see
the
Diving
Bird
Study,_
and
the
nanotag
studies
or
contact
C
a
leb
S
12 ie
g
e
l
or
P
a
m
Lorin
g
.

What
if
I
have
eagles
on
my
list?
If
your
project
has
the
potential
to
disturb
or
kill
eagles,
you
may
need
to
obtain
a
12ermit
to
avoid
violating
the
Eagle
Act
should
such
impacts
occur
.

Proper
Interpretation
and
Use
of
Your
Migratory
Bird
Report
The
migratory
bird
list
generated
is
not
a
list
of
all
birds
in
your
project
area,
only
a
subset
of
birds
of
priority
concern.

To
learn
more
about how
your
list
is
generated,
and
see
options
for
identifying
what
other
birds
may
be
in
your
project
area,
please
see
the
FAQ
"What
does
IPaC
use
to
generate
the
migratory
birds
potentially
occurring
in
my
specified
location".

Please
be
aware
this
report
provides
the
"probability
of
ATTACHMENT 23
presence"
of
birds
within
the
10 km
grid
cell(s)
that
overlap
your
project;
not
your
exact
project
footprint.

On
the
graphs
provided,
please
also
look
carefully
at
the
survey
effort
(indicated
by
the
black
vertical
bar)
and
for
the
existence
of
the
"no
data"
indicator
(a
red
horizontal
bar).

A
high
survey
effort
is
the
key
component.

If
the
survey
effort
is
high,
then the
probability
of
presence
score
can
be
viewed
as
more
dependable.

In
contrast,
a
low
survey
effort
bar
or
no
data
bar
means
a
lack
of
data
and,
therefore,
a
lack
of
certainty
about
presence
of
the
species.

This
list
is
not
perfect;
it
is
simply
a
starting
point
for
identifying
what
birds
of
concern
have
the
potential
to
be
in
your
project
area,
when
they
might
be
there,
and
if
they
might
be
breeding
(which
means
nests
might
be
present).

The
list
helps
you
know
what
to
look
for
to
confirm
presence,
and
helps
guide
you
in
knowing
when
to
implement
conservation
measures
to
avoid
or
minimize
potential
impacts
from
your
project
activities,
should
presence
be
confirmed.

To
learn
more
about
conservation
measures,
visit
the
FAQ
"Tell
me
about
conservation
measures
I
can
implement
to
avoid
or
minimize
impacts
to
migratory
birds"
at
the
bottom
of
your
migratory
bird
trust
resources
page.

Facilities
National
Wildlife
Refuge
lands
Any
activity
proposed
on
lands
managed
by
the
National
Wildlife
Refuge.
system
must
undergo
a
'Compatibility
Determination'
conducted
by
the
Refuge.

Please
contact
the
individual
Refuges
to
discuss
any
questions
or
concerns.

There
are
no
refuge
lands
at
this
location.

Fish
hatcheries
There
are
no
fish
hatcheries
at
this
location.

Wetlands
in
the
National
Wetlands
Inventory
(NWI)
Impacts
to
NWI
wetlands
and
other
aquatic
habitats
may
be
subject
to
regulation
under
Section
404
of
the
Clean
Water
Act,
or
other
State/Federal
statutes.

For
more
information
please
contact
the
Regulatory
Program
of
the
local
U.S.

ArmY.

CoqJs
of
Engineers
Distric
t.

ATTACHMENT 23
Please
note
that
the
NWI
data
being
shown
may
be
out
of
date.

We
are
currently
working
to
update
our
NWI
data
set.

We
recommend
you
verify
these
results
with
a
site
visit
to
determine
the
actual
extent
of
wetlands
on
site.

This
location
overlaps
the
following
wetlands:

RIVERINE
R3UBH
A
full
description
for
each
wetland
code
can
be
found
at
the
National
Wetlands
lnvento[Y.
website
NOTE:

This
initial
screening
does
not
replace
an
on-site
delineation
to
determine
whether
wetlands
occur.

Additional
information
on
the
NWI
data
is
provided
below.

Data
limitations
The
Service's
objective
of
mapping
wetlands
and
deepwater
habitats
is
to
produce
reconnaissance
level
information
on
the
location,
type
and
size
of
these
resources.

The
maps
are
prepared
from
the
analysis
of
high
altitude
imagery.

Wetlands
are
identified
based
on
vegetation,
visible
hydrology
and
geography.

A
margin
of
error
is
inherent
in
the
use
of
imagery;
thus,
detailed
on-the-ground
inspection
of
any
particular
site
may
result
in
revision
of
the
wetland
boundaries
or
classification
established
through
image
analysis.

The
accuracy
of
image
interpretation
depends
on
the
quality
of
the
imagery,
the
experience
of
the
image
analysts,
the
amount
and
quality
of
the
collateral
data
and
the
amount
of
ground
truth
verification
work
conducted
.

Metadata
should
be
consulted
to
determine
the
date
of
the
source
imagery
used
and
any
mapping
problems.

Wetlands
or
other
mapped
features
may
have
changed
since
the
date
of
the
imagery
or
field
work.

There
may
be
occasional
differences
in
polygon
boundaries
or
classifications
between
the
information
depicted
on
the
map
and
the
actual
conditions
on
site.

Data
exclusions
Certain
wetland
habitats
are
excluded
from
the
National
mapping
program
because
of
the
limitations
of
aerial
imagery
as
the
primary
data
source
used
to
detect
wetlands.

These
habitats
include
seagrasses
or
submerged
aquatic
vegetation
that
are
found
in
the
intertidal
and
subtidal
zones
of
estuaries
and
nearshore
coastal
waters.

Some
deepwater
reef
communities
(coral
or
tuberficid
worm
reefs)
have
also
been
excluded
from
the
inventory.

These
habitats,
because
of
their
depth,
go
undetected
by
aerial
imagery.

Data
precautions
Federal
,
state,
and
local
regulatory
agencies
with
jurisdiction
over
wetlands
may
define
and
describe
wetlands
in
a
different
manner
than
that
used
in
this
inventory.

There
is
no
attempt,
in
either
the
design
or
products
of
this
inventory,
to
define
the
limits
of
proprietary
jurisdiction
of
any
Federal,
state,
or
local
government
or
to
establish
the
geographical
scope
of
the
regulatory
programs
of
government
agencies.

Persons
intending
to
engage
in
activities
involving
modifications
within
or
adjacent
to
wetland
areas
should
ATTACHMENT 23
seek
the
advice
of
appropriate
Federal,
state,
or
local
agencies
concerning
specified
agency
regulatory
programs
and
proprietary
jurisdictions
that
may
affect
such
activities.

ATTACHMENT 23
First Street Napa Phase II Project

Initial Study/
Addendum

FCS

APPENDIX E:

Cultural Resources Search
ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23
Non-discretionary Permit, Archaeological Status Report
THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY LEVEL FOR THIS PARCEL IS: High Recommendation:

This parcel is in an area normally considered to have a high archaeological sensitivity. An archaeological evaluation has indicated that no archaeological sites are present. The recommendations of the report should be consulted and implemented where applicable to the proposed project. Should any artifacts or archaeological features be encountered at any time during the proposed project, all work should be halted in the vicinity of the discovery, and the City of Napa should be contacted immediately.

ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT INFORMATION:

The findings of this report are:

Positive
State File Number(s):

How many recorded archaeological sites were identified? Was the report part of a larger environmental evaluation (EIR)? Yes Recorded Archaeological
Sites:

REPORTS WITH A STATE FILE NUMBER ARE ON FILE WITH THE REGIONAL OFFICE OF THE

CALIFORNIA HISTORIC RESOURCE INVENTORY SYSTEM, LOCATED AT SONOMA STATE UNIVERSITY

THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL STATUS REPORT IS AN INITIAL EVALUATION TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTATION PRIOR TO INITIATING A PERMITTED PROJECT.

Monday, March 24, 2025 8:50:02 AM
THIS STATUS REPORT WAS GENERATED ON:

THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL STATUS REPORT IS VALID FOR SIX MONTHS FROM THE ABOVE DATE.

Other Reported
Resources:

PARCEL NUMBER:
31661500
Other File Reference:

EIR: Napa River/Napa Creek Flood Reduction
Area:
1657.82570 sq. ft.

Address
*No Site Address*
Owner's Last Name:

Zoning Designation:

CBP
Land Use:

VACANT,NON-TAXABLE
PastFinder is a product of Archaeological Resource Service, Petaluma, California (707) 762-2573

Page 1 of 1 ends

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
1 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
000196
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
000196
Trinomial:

CA-
NAP-
000228
Name:

Nelson
No.
228
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Nelson
No.
228
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Site
Age:

Prehistoric
Information
base:

Unknown
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Not
for
publication
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
8/24/1958
E.

Robinson
[none]
Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/1/2005
(icrds)
Last
modified:
4/26/2017
(grahams)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
4/1/2005
jay
Appended
records
from
discontinued
ICRDS.
4/24/2017
hagell
edited
resource
name
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
2 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
000619
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
000619
Trinomial:

CA-
NAP-
000744
Name:

Napa/1
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Napa/1
OHP
PRN
COE890522A
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Site
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Not
for
publication
Collections:

Yes
Accession
no(s):
[none]
Facility:

Greenwood
and
Associates
General
notes
collected
by
Rosenson
(1975):
"These
materials
were
recovered
from
two
test
trenches
and
two
test
pits."
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
3/3/1988
R.

Paul
Hampson,
Roberta
S.

Greenwood
Greenwood
and
Associates
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
010794
1989
Cultural
Resource
Investigation
at
China
Point
Park,
Napa
Greenwood
and
Associates
S-
036531
2009
Archaeological
Survey
of
Approximately

4.5 Acres
Along
Napa
Creek
in
Napa
County,
California,
for
the
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
(NCBSP)
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
S-
001403
1975
Field
Notes
of
Archaeological
Reconnaissance
Made
on
the
"Chinatown",
NAP-
261,and
NAP-
14 Sites
Situated
Along
the
Napa
River
Basin.

S-
030595
2004
Archaeological
Testing
and
National
Register
Re-
Evaluation,
CA-
NAP-
744H
(P-
28-
000619),
Napa
Chinatown
and
Vicinity,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

S-
009053
1975
An
Historical
Study
and
the
Cultural
Evaluation
of
a
Chinatown
Site
in
the
City
of
Napa
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Napa
PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 562700mE
4239100mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/1/2005
(icrds)
Last
modified:
9/11/2019
(Niece)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
4/1/2005
jay
Appended
records
from
discontinued
ICRDS.
8/26/2016
hagell
edited
resource
name,
recording
event
9/11/2019
Niece
Edited
collections
data
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
3 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
000966
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
000966
Trinomial:

CA-
NAP-
001113
Name:

Southern
Pacific
Railroad
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Southern
Pacific
Railroad
OHP
PRN
4574-
0072-
0000
OTIS
Resource
Number
683579
Caltrans
04-
NAP-
29,
PM

25.5/28.4,
EA
04-
219-
259400
Other
F3
Other
F4
Other
C-
Cuttings
Wharf-
1 Other
Southern
Pacific
Railroad
right-
of-
way
and
trestles
Other
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train
Other
Napa
Valley
Railroad
Voided
P-
28-
001188
National
Register
NPS
96001535
Other
Napa
Valley-
Southern
Pacific
RR
OHP
PRN
FHWA061024A
6Y
Cross-
refs:

Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
01-
001783
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
06-
000586
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
27-
002923
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
35-
000334
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
41-
001877
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
43-
000928
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
44-
000377
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
48-
000549
Extends
into
another
county
as
P-
49-
001510
Physically
overlaps
or
intersects
P-
28-
001750
See
also
P-
28-
001528
See
also
P-
28-
001733
See
also
P-
28-
001751
Subsumes
P-
28-
001157
Subsumes
P-
28-
001188
Is
an
element
of
district
P-
28-
001547
Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Not
for
publication
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
2/17/1998
Adam
Sriro,
Bright
Eastman
Anthropological
Studies
Center,
Sonoma
State
University
Original
record
for
P-
28-
000966
e
8/1/2008
Vicki
Beard
Tom
Origer
&
Associates
a
recording
of
4 features,
2 of
which
are
included
in
this
record
b
8/4/1999
J.

Nelson
Jones
&
Stokes
Original
record
for
P-
28-
001188,
subsumed
c
6/21/2001
Matt
Bischoff
Statistical
Research,
Inc.

Napa
Valley
Wine
Train
d
2/1/2006
Vida
Germano,
Noah
Stewart
Caltrans
District
4 Napa
Valley
Railroad
h
4/1/2009
Nelson
Thompson
Tom
Origer
&
Assoc
reconnaissance
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
036261
VOIDED
S#:
see
additional
citation
'b'
of
S-
36559
S-
052390
2019
Archaeological
Survey
and
Extended
Phase
I
Testing
Report
for
the
Soscol
Avenue
Mixed
Use
Development,
City
of
Napa,
California
Far
Western
Anthropological
Research
Group,
Inc.

S-
016849
VOIDED
S#
-
additional
citation
'd'
of
S-
7618
S-
029242
2004
A
Cultural
Resources
Study
of
the
Proposed
North
Napa
Siphon
and
Pipeline
Project,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California.

Anthropological
Studies
Center,
Sonoma
State
University
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
4 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
S-
007618
1986
Historic
Properties
Survey
Report,
Proposed
Shoulder
Widening
and
Installation
of
Left
Turn
Lanes
Along
St.

Helena
Highway,
Napa
County,
4-
NAP-
29 22.2/28.4
04226-
111330
Caltrans
District
4 S-
019204
1997
A
Cultural
Resources
Evaluation
of
the
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train,
St.

Helena
Station
Archaeological
Resource
Service
S-
019206
1997
Cultural
Resources
Evaluation
of
the
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train,
Yountville
Station
Archaeological
Resource
Service
S-
039456
2012
A
Cultural
Resources
Investigation
of
the
California
Department
of
Fish
and
Game,
In-
stream
Flow
Measurements
on
Napa
Tributaries
Project
(R3-
60),
Napa
County,
California
Cultural
Resources
Facility,
Humboldt
State
University
S-
020115
1998
A
Cultural
Resources
Study
of
the
Piazza
Dei
Cotta
Development
Project,
Yountville,
Napa
County,
California
Anthropological
Studies
Center,
Sonoma
State
University
S-
038004
2006
Historic
Property
Survey
Report,
04-
NAP-
29/12
&
221,
KP

8.0/11.4

0.0/1.2,
PM

5.0/7.1

0.0/.7,
CU
175/170,
EA
281200
Caltrans
S-
022736
2000
Final
Cultural
Resources
Inventory
Report
for
Williams
Communications,
Inc.,
Fiber
Optic
Cable
System
Installation
Project,
Point
Arena
to
Robbins
and
Point
Arena
to
Sacramento,
California:

Volume
I
Jones
&
Stokes
Associates,
Inc.

S-
006324
1983
Report
of
Archaeological
Test
Excavations,
City
of
Calistoga
NBA
Water
Supply
Project,
Napa
County,
California
Archaeological
Consulting
and
Research
Services,
Inc.

S-
044293
2013
Cultural
Resources
Constraints
Report:

Pueblo-
1103
Blitz-
Napa
Distribution
Circuit
Reliability
Improvements
Cardno
ENTRIX
S-
044294
2013
Cultural
Resources
Constraints
Report:

Silverado
2105
Circuit-
Napa
Reconductoring
Cardno
ENTRIX
S-
057312
2022
Cultural
Resources
Letter
Report:

Residences
at
Napa
Junction
Cultural
Resources
Peer
Review
Analytical
Environmental
Services
S-
022603
2000
Archaeological
Survey
Report
for
Proposed
Site
Improvements
at
Rutherford
Depot
for
the
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train,
Rutherford,
Napa
County,
California
Heritage
Resources
Management
S-
052322
2019
Cultural
Resources
Letter
Report
for
Napa
Pipe
2018
Revised
Project,
Napa
County,
California
Natural
Investigations
Company
S-
036559
2009
Historic
Property
and
Archaeological
Survey
Reports,
proposed
bike
path
between
post
miles
04-
NAP-
29 19.0
and

19.8,
ESPL-
5395
(001)/965100
Caltrans,
District
4 S-
033573
2007
A
Cultural
Resources
Survey
of
APN
036-
330-
001,
2200
and
2210
Webber
Avenue,
Yountville,
Napa
County,
California
Tom
Origer
&
Associates
S-
034138
VOIDED
S#
-
additional
citation
'a'
of
S-
034210
S-
034210
2006
Historic
Property
Survey
Report
for
the
Route
29 Saint
Helena
Left-
Turn
Channelization
and
Road
Rehabilitation
Project
in
Napa
County,
California,
04-
NAP-
29,
PM

25.5/28.4
(KP

41.0/45.7),
EA
259400.

Caltrans
S-
034685
2003
Cultural
Resources
Data
Recovery
of
a
Portion
of
the
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train
Rail
Line,
Napa
County,
California
Statistical
Research,
Inc.

S-
024386
2001
Historic
Context
for
and
Evaluation
of
the
Napa
Valley
Railroad
Statistical
Research,
Inc.

Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Calistoga
Cuttings
Wharf
Napa
Rutherford
St
Helena
Yountville
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
027-
470-
006
027-
470-
008
027-
270-
026
027-
450-
024
027-
450-
008
030-
020-
012
030-
120-
013
009-
120-
002
009-
660-
016
009-
111-
001
009-
110-
001
009-
090-
039
030-
270-
011
030-
260-
001
030-
030-
002
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
5 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 555400mE
4250750mN
NAD27
Zone
10 562650mE
4232900mN
NAD27
Zone
10 563030mE
4236970mN
NAD27
Zone
10 563010mE
4326560mN
NAD27
Zone
10 555340mE
4250780mN
NAD27
Zone
10 555460mE
4250740mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/1/2005
(icrds)
Last
modified:
10/18/2022
(neala)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
4/1/2005
jay
Appended
records
from
discontinued
ICRDS.
4/1/1998
AOLPJ
Primary
number
28-
000966
assigned.
4/24/2009
jordanl
subsumed
P-
28-
001157
into
this
record
('c')
11/18/2008
jordanl
subsumed
P-
28-
001188
into
this
record
('b')
2/4/2015
rinerg
collated
PDF
pages
and
folder
pages
to
match
recording
events
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
6 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001019
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001019
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Bridge
21C-
96 Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Bridge
21C-
96 OHP
PRN
DOE
28-
99-
0014-
0000
Other
First
Street
Bridge
over
Napa
Creek
OHP
Property
Number
122962
Other
First
Street
over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
(#21C-
96)
OHP
PRN
COE990324A
OHP
PRN
FHWA030430X
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
04-
0008-
0000
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Structure
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
3/1/1999
Stephen
D.

Mikesell
JRP
Historical
Consulting
Services
DOE-
28-
99-
0014-
0000/COE990324A
c
12/18/2002
Stacie
Ham,
Andrew
Hope
Caltrans
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
036531
2009
Archaeological
Survey
of
Approximately

4.5 Acres
Along
Napa
Creek
in
Napa
County,
California,
for
the
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
(NCBSP)
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
S-
030595
2004
Archaeological
Testing
and
National
Register
Re-
Evaluation,
CA-
NAP-
744H
(P-
28-
000619),
Napa
Chinatown
and
Vicinity,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

S-
030905
2003
Caltrans
Statewide
Historic
Bridge
Update
-
Survey
and
Evaluation
of
Masonry
Arch
Bridges
California
Department
of
Transportation
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Napa
94559
PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 561355mE
4238943mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/1/2005
(icrds)
Last
modified:
1/6/2017
(simsa)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
4/1/2005
jay
Appended
records
from
discontinued
ICRDS.
8/4/2000
AOLPJ
Primary
number
28-
001019
assigned.
1/6/2017
simsa
DOE-
28-
04-
0008-
0000
and
FHWA030430X
not
on
file
at
the
NWIC.

Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
7 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001136
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001136
Trinomial:

CA-
NAP-
000958
Name:

ARS
99-
61-
01 Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
ARS
99-
61-
01 Other
American
Center
for
Wine,
Food,
and
Arts
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Site
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Not
for
publication
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/1999
Cassandra
Chattan,
Elizabeth
Bedolla
Archaeological
Resource
Service
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
015511
1993
A
preliminary
archival
research
and
backhoe
investigation
of
the
Oxbow
project
area
within
the
City
of
Napa
(letter
report)
Tom
Origer
and
Associates
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
500
First
Street
Napa
PLSS:

T5N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

MDBM
UTMs:

Zone
10 563040mE
4239460mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/6/2005
(jay)
Last
modified:
5/15/2017
(surgeonj)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
4/6/2005
jay
Entered
minimal
information
from
hard
copy
list
provided
by
Leigh.

Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
8 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001238
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001238
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Borreo
Building
920
Third
Street,
Napa,
CA
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Borreo
Building
920
Third
Street,
Napa,
CA
OHP
PRN
4558-
0148-
0000
Other
Thompson
Beard
&
Sons
Grain
&
Feed
Other
Borreo
Building
OHP
PRN
28-
0005
OHP
Property
Number
000249
OHP
PRN
4558-
0148-
0000
OHP
PRN
65006862
Other
Holmes
Moving
and
Storage
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
This
property
was
given
a
status
of
2S1
(Howse;
Hist.Surv.
4558-
0148-
0000)
in
1979
and
the
status
changed
to
7J
in
1990
(Howse
NAT
.

REG.
28-
0005).

Recently,
URS
(2004),
on
behalf
of
FEMA,
evaluated
this
property
(FEMA
040610A;
on
file
at
NWIC
in
DOE
Files)
and
came
to
the
conclusion
that
the
building
had
lost
its
integrity
and
was
not
eligible
for
the
NRHP.

Currently,
the
property
is
listed
with
the
following
status:
7W
(01/31/90).

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
b
5/3/2004
David
Livingstone
URS
Corp.
a
4/24/1978
K.

Kernberger
Napa
Historic
Preservation
Society
4558-
0148-
0000
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
028617
2004
Cultural
Resources
Technical
Report,
Borreo
Building
Retrofit,
City
of
Napa,
DPMC-
PJ-
09-
CA-
2003-
019
URS
Corporation
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
920
Third
Street
Napa
006-
131-
007-
000
94559
PLSS:

T5N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

MDBM
UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/6/2005
(jay)
Last
modified:
5/15/2017
(surgeonj)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
4/6/2005
jay
Entered
minimal
information
from
hard
copy
list
provided
by
Leigh.
5/16/2014
castrom
Information
was
verifed
and
updated.
5/12/2017
moored
Joseph
has
been
contacted
for
looking
for
other
OHP
documentation.

Added
HRI
recording
event
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
9 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001248
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001248
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1410
Seminary
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1410
Seminary
Street
OHP
Property
Number
155141
OHP
PRN
COE940104A
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
building
was
demolished
as
part
of
the
Napa
Flood
Control
Project
[TZ
8/17/18]
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
4/1/2004
Ward
Hill
[none]
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
028983
2004
Historic
Architecture
Report,
1410
Seminary
Street,
City
of
Napa
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1410
Seminary
Street
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/6/2005
(jay)
Last
modified:
9/7/2018
(rinerg)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
4/6/2005
jay
Entered
minimal
information
from
hard
copy
list
provided
by
Leigh.
8/17/2018
zavalat
made
general
note
9/7/2018
rinerg
check
InfoBase=SurfaceSurvey
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
10 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001295
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001295
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Pearl
Street
over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
(#21C-
97)
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Pearl
Street
over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
(#21C-
97)
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
04-
0024-
0000
OHP
PRN
FHWA030430X
OHP
Property
Number
147022
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Structure
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
12/18/2002
Stacie
Ham,
Andrew
Hope
Caltrans-
Headquarters
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
036531
2009
Archaeological
Survey
of
Approximately

4.5 Acres
Along
Napa
Creek
in
Napa
County,
California,
for
the
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
(NCBSP)
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
S-
030905
2003
Caltrans
Statewide
Historic
Bridge
Update
-
Survey
and
Evaluation
of
Masonry
Arch
Bridges
California
Department
of
Transportation
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Napa
PLSS:

T6N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

MDBM
UTMs:

Zone
10 562519mE
4239198mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
12/15/2005
(kellyn)
Last
modified:
1/6/2017
(simsa)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
1/6/2017
simsa
DOE-
28-
04-
0024-
0000
and
FHWA030430X
not
on
file
at
the
NWIC
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
11 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001296
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001296
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Coombs
Street
over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
(#21C-
94)
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Coombs
Street
over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
(#21C-
94)
OHP
Property
Number
147021
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
04-
0023-
0000
OHP
PRN
FHWA030430X
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Structure
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
FHWA030430X
and
DOE-
28-
04-
0023-
0000
are
not
on
file
at
the
NWIC.

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
12/18/2002
Stacie
Ham,
Andrew
Hope
Caltrans-
Headquarts
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
036531
2009
Archaeological
Survey
of
Approximately

4.5 Acres
Along
Napa
Creek
in
Napa
County,
California,
for
the
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
(NCBSP)
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
S-
030905
2003
Caltrans
Statewide
Historic
Bridge
Update
-
Survey
and
Evaluation
of
Masonry
Arch
Bridges
California
Department
of
Transportation
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Coombs
St
Napa
PLSS:

T6N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

MDBM
UTMs:

Zone
10 562353mE
4239201mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
12/15/2005
(kellyn)
Last
modified:
1/5/2017
(moored)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
1/5/2017
moored
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
12 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001297
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001297
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Seminary
Street
over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
(#21C-
92)
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Seminary
Street
over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
(#21C-
92)
OHP
Property
Number
147020
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
04-
0022-
0000
OHP
PRN
FHWA030430X
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Structure
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
FHWA030430X
and
DOE-
28-
04-
0022-
0000
are
not
on
file
at
the
NWIC.

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
12/18/2002
Stacie
Ham,
Andrew
Hope
Caltrans-
Headquarters
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
036531
2009
Archaeological
Survey
of
Approximately

4.5 Acres
Along
Napa
Creek
in
Napa
County,
California,
for
the
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
(NCBSP)
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
S-
030905
2003
Caltrans
Statewide
Historic
Bridge
Update
-
Survey
and
Evaluation
of
Masonry
Arch
Bridges
California
Department
of
Transportation
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Seminary
Street
Napa
PLSS:

T6N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

MDBM
UTMs:

Zone
10 562228mE
4239227mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
12/15/2005
(kellyn)
Last
modified:
8/26/2016
(hagell)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
13 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001298
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001298
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Jefferson
Street
over
Napa
Creek
(#21C-
10)
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Jefferson
Street
over
Napa
Creek
(#21C-
10)
OHP
Property
Number
147017
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
04-
0018-
0000
OHP
PRN
FHWA030430X
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Structure
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
FHWA030430X
and
DOE-
28-
04-
0018-
0000
are
not
on
file
at
the
NWIC.

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
12/18/2002
Stacie
Ham,
Andrew
Hope
Caltrans-
Headquarters
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
036531
2009
Archaeological
Survey
of
Approximately

4.5 Acres
Along
Napa
Creek
in
Napa
County,
California,
for
the
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
(NCBSP)
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
S-
030905
2003
Caltrans
Statewide
Historic
Bridge
Update
-
Survey
and
Evaluation
of
Masonry
Arch
Bridges
California
Department
of
Transportation
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Jefferson
Street
Napa
PLSS:

T6N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

HBM
UTMs:

Zone
10 561937mE
4239132mN
NAD27
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
12/15/2005
(kellyn)
Last
modified:
8/26/2016
(hagell)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
14 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001327
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001327
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Bridge
21C0044
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Bridge
21C0044
Caltrans
Bridge
21C0044
Caltrans
Bridge
21C-
44 OHP
Property
Number
147018
National
Register
28-
0071
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
04-
0019-
0000
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Structure
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Not
for
publication
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
12/18/2002
Stacie
Ham,
Andrew
Hope
Caltrans-
Headquarters
b
8/1/2005
Andrew
Hope
Caltrans
c
1/2/2006
Stacie
Ham
Napa
County
Landmarks,
Inc.
28-
0071
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
030902
2005
Historic
Resource
Evaluation
Report,
Re-
Evaluation
of
the
Main
Street
Bridge
in
Napa,
Napa
County
(Bridge
21C0044)
California
Department
of
Transportation
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Main
Street,
southeast
of
Pearl
Street
Napa
94559
PLSS:

T6N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

MDBM
UTMs:

Zone
0 562520mE
4239136mN
NAD27
(Main
Street
over
Napa
Creek)
Zone
0 562520mE
4239136mN
NAD27
(Main
Street
southeast
of
Pearl
Street)
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/25/2006
(liz)
Last
modified:
1/6/2017
(simsa)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
1/6/2017
simsa
DOE-
28-
04-
019-
0000
is
not
on
file
at
the
NWIC
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
15 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001438
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001438
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Sunsweet
Fruit
Packing
Warehouse
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Sunsweet
Fruit
Packing
Warehouse
Other
California
Prune
&
Apricot
Association
Packing
Sheds
Other
Sunsweet
Plant
No.
6 OHP
Property
Number
170024
OHP
PRN
FCC080108D
Other
California
Prune
&
Apricot
Growers
Packing
House
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
12/1/2007
Dana
E.

Supernowicz
Historic
Resource
Associates
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
034513
2008
New
Tower
("NT")
Submission
Packet,
FCC
Form
620,
849
Jackson,
SF18860A
Earth
Touch,
Inc.,
Historic
Resource
Associates
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
849
Jackson
Street
Napa
507-
0645-
020-
02 94559
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/24/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
5/15/2017
(surgeonj)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
5/12/2017
moored
FCC080108D
not
on
file
at
the
NWIC
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
16 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001507
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001507
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
743
First
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
743
First
Street
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Building
no
longer
there
(JJS
08/21/18).

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
743
First
Street
Napa
003-
241-
001
[incorrect]
003-
241-
05 [current]
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
17 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001508
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001508
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
807
Soscol
Avenue
/
812
3rd
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
807
Soscol
Avenue
/
812
3rd
Street
OHP
Property
Number
176185
OHP
PRN
COE940104A
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Assocites,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
807
Soscol
Avenue
Napa
006-
131-
005
812
3rd
Street
Napa
006-
131-
006
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
9/5/2018
neala
corrected
recorder
name
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
18 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001509
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001509
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
876
Water
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
876
Water
Street
OHP
Property
Number
176163
OHP
PRN
COE940104A
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Building
no
longer
there
(JJS
08/21/18).

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
876
Water
Street
Napa
003-
242-
001
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
19 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001510
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001510
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
923
Water
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
923
Water
Street
Other
Napa
Corporation
Yard
OHP
Property
Number
176186
OHP
PRN
COE940104A
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
923
Water
Street
Napa
003-
242-
003
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
20 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001511
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001511
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1415
Earl
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1415
Earl
Street
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1415
Earl
Street
Napa
003-
126-
002
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
21 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001512
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001512
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1404
Center
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1404
Center
Street
OHP
Property
Number
176187
OHP
PRN
COE940104A
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1404
Center
Street
Napa
003-
127-
001
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
22 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001513
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001513
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1434
Center
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1434
Center
Street
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1434
Center
Street
Napa
003-
127-
003
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
23 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001514
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001514
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1440
Center
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1440
Center
Street
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1440
Center
Street
Napa
003-
127-
004
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
24 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001515
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001515
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1450
Center
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1450
Center
Street
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
7/1/2008
Ward
Hill
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1450
Center
Street
Napa
003-
127-
005
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/9/2008
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/5/2018
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
25 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001547
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001547
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Napa
Valley
Railroad
District
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Napa
Valley
Railroad
District
Other
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train
Other
Southern
Pacific
Railroad
Cross-
refs:

Physically
overlaps
or
intersects
P-
28-
002608
See
also
P-
28-
001733
Is
a
district
with
element
P-
28-
000966
Is
a
district
with
element
P-
28-
001750
Is
a
district
with
element
P-
28-
001751
Attributes
Resource
type:

District
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
5/1/2006
Vida
Germano
Caltrans
District
4 Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
052390
2019
Archaeological
Survey
and
Extended
Phase
I
Testing
Report
for
the
Soscol
Avenue
Mixed
Use
Development,
City
of
Napa,
California
Far
Western
Anthropological
Research
Group,
Inc.

S-
040023
2012
Cultural
Resource
Inventory
and
Buried
Site
Sensitivity
Model
for
the
Town
of
Yountville
Recycled
Water
Expansion
Project,
Napa
County,
California
Anthropological
Studies
Center,
Sonoma
State
University
S-
016849
VOIDED
S#
-
additional
citation
'd'
of
S-
7618
S-
034210
2006
Historic
Property
Survey
Report
for
the
Route
29 Saint
Helena
Left-
Turn
Channelization
and
Road
Rehabilitation
Project
in
Napa
County,
California,
04-
NAP-
29,
PM

25.5/28.4
(KP

41.0/45.7),
EA
259400.

Caltrans
S-
007618
1986
Historic
Properties
Survey
Report,
Proposed
Shoulder
Widening
and
Installation
of
Left
Turn
Lanes
Along
St.

Helena
Highway,
Napa
County,
4-
NAP-
29 22.2/28.4
04226-
111330
Caltrans
District
4 S-
039456
2012
A
Cultural
Resources
Investigation
of
the
California
Department
of
Fish
and
Game,
In-
stream
Flow
Measurements
on
Napa
Tributaries
Project
(R3-
60),
Napa
County,
California
Cultural
Resources
Facility,
Humboldt
State
University
S-
044293
2013
Cultural
Resources
Constraints
Report:

Pueblo-
1103
Blitz-
Napa
Distribution
Circuit
Reliability
Improvements
Cardno
ENTRIX
S-
034685
2003
Cultural
Resources
Data
Recovery
of
a
Portion
of
the
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train
Rail
Line,
Napa
County,
California
Statistical
Research,
Inc.

S-
052322
2019
Cultural
Resources
Letter
Report
for
Napa
Pipe
2018
Revised
Project,
Napa
County,
California
Natural
Investigations
Company
S-
051333
2018
Archaeological
Investigation
for
the
Riverside
Ponds
&
Headworks
River
Bank
Repair
Project
-
Geotechnical
Soil
Testing
-
HMGP
4240-
20-
27,
Napa
County,
California
Tetra
Tech,
Inc.

S-
034138
VOIDED
S#
-
additional
citation
'a'
of
S-
034210
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Calistoga
Napa
Rutherford
St
Helena
Yountville
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
4/30/2009
(jordanl)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
26 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Last
modified:
8/2/2021
(neala)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
3/15/2017
hagell
edited
other
identifier
8/2/2021
neala
added
attributes
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
27 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001613
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001613
Trinomial:

CA-
NAP-
001099
Name:

ASM-
Napa-
1 Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
ASM-
Napa-
1 Other
FS#
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Site
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Not
for
publication
Collections:

Yes
Accession
no(s):
[none]
Facility:

ASM
affiliates
General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
8/13/2011
S.S.

Mahoney,
L.

Fryman,
and
K.

Sprengeler
ASM
Affiliates,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
038617
2012
Archaeological
Testing
of
CA-
NAP-
1099H,
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
ASM
Affiliates
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1102
Pearl
Street
Napa
94559
PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 562318mE
4239423mN
NAD83
(2011
record)
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
1/3/2012
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
9/18/2019
(NiecE)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
9/18/2019
NiecE
Edited
collections
data
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
28 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001614
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001614
Trinomial:

CA-
NAP-
001100
Name:

Brick
wall
footing
and
historic
debris
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Brick
wall
footing
and
historic
debris
Other
Trash
Deposit,
Dump
from
Chinese
Laundry
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Site
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Not
for
publication
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
2/12/2011
Melissa
Montag
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
038402
2011
Napa
Creek
Flood
Control
Project
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
S-
038617
2012
Archaeological
Testing
of
CA-
NAP-
1099H,
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
ASM
Affiliates
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1201
Main
Street
Napa
94559
PLSS:

T5N
R4W
of
of
Sec.

MDBM
UTMs:

Zone
10 562331mE
4239416mN
NAD83
(2011
record)
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
1/3/2012
(jordanl)
Last
modified:
1/6/2017
(simsa)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
29 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001674
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001674
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
850
Caymus
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
850
Caymus
Street
OHP
PRN
DOE
28-
99-
0004-
0000
OHP
Property
Number
122855
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
3/2/1999
Sean
Dexter,
Mary
Sayers
[none]
Original
Record
Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
850
Caymus
Street
Napa
003-
145-
010
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
11/5/2013
(castrom)
Last
modified:
3/5/2015
(grahams)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
2/19/2015
castrom
GIS
Completed
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
30 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001678
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001678
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1032
Caymus
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1032
Caymus
Street
OHP
PRN
DOE
28-
99-
0005-
0000
OHP
Property
Number
99797
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
3/2/1999
Sean
Dexter,
Mary
Sayers
[none]
Original
Record
Associated
reports
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1032
Caymus
Street
Napa
003-
135-
008
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
11/5/2013
(castrom)
Last
modified:
3/5/2015
(grahams)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
2/19/2015
castrom
GIS
Completed
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
31 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001835
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001835
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1300
Clay
Street
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1300
Clay
Street
Other
Venture
Commerce
Center
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
5/23/2012
Britta
Fenniman
EBI
Consulting
b
9/15/2015
K.A.

Crawford
Crawford
Historic
Services
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
046614
2015
Collocation
("CO")
Submission
Packet,
Downtown
Napa,
Project
No.

SF33XC812E
EarthTouch,
Inc.

S-
047946
2015
FCC
Form
621
Collocation
Submission
Packet:

BA00389A
(SF389
Napa
AT&T),
1300
Clay
Street,
Napa,
CA
94559
Environmental
Assessment
Specialists,
Inc.

Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1300
Clay
Street
Napa
94559
PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 562187mE
4239212mN
NAD83
(2012)
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
7/12/2016
(simsa)
Last
modified:
2/3/2017
(grahams)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
7/12/2016
simsa
Added
resource
from
S-
46614;
populated
database
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
32 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001880
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001880
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Bridge
21C-
12 Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Bridge
21C-
12 Other
Third
Street
Bridge
over
Napa
River
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
99-
0015-
0000
OHP
PRN
COE-
990324A
OHP
Property
Number
122963
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Structure
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
3/1/1999
Stephen
D.

Mikesell
JRP
Historical
Consulting
DOE-
28-
99-
0015-
0000/COE-
990324A
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
023097
1999
Historic
Property
Survey
Report,
Third
Street
(
Bridge
21C-
12)
Over
the
Napa
River
Replacement
Project,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
California
Department
of
Transportation
District
4 Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Napa
94559
PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 562745mE
4238943mN
NAD83
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
5/12/2017
(moored)
Last
modified:
5/15/2017
(surgeonj)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
5/12/2017
moored
Assign
P#,
taken
from
COE-
990324A
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
33 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
001996
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
001996
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:
1021
McKenzie
Drive
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
1021
McKenzie
Drive
OHP
Property
Number
184266
OHP
PRN
4558-
0835-
0000
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
a
1/1/2011
K.

Horak,
A.

Lyons,
M.

Davis
Architectural
Resources
Group,
Inc.

Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
049120
2011
Alta
Heights
Historic
Context
Statement
and
Survey
Report,
Napa,
California
Architectural
Resources
Group
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1021
McKenzie
Dr
Napa
045-
090-
09 PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
7/7/2017
(yanagig)
Last
modified:
2/20/2018
(yanagig)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
7/7/2017
yanagig
Assigned
primary
number
using
import
tool.
7/14/2017
rinerg
correct
the
location
address
(was:
1015
Clark
St,
Napa,
CA)
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
34 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
002440
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
002440
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Hatt
Building/Napa
Mill
Building
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Hatt
Building/Napa
Mill
Building
OHP
Property
Number
000151
OHP
PRN
DOE-
28-
94-
0004-
0000
OHP
PRN
NPS-
77000316-
0000
OHP
PRN
4558-
0050-
0000
OHP
PRN
COE940104A
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
c
11/5/1992
Rand
Herbert;
Stephen
D.

Mikesell
JRP
Historical
Consulting
Services
DOE-
28-
94-
0004-
0000
b
4/24/1978
Frederick
Pond
Napa
Co.

Hist.

Pres.
&
Her.

Com.

HRI
a
8/12/1974
David
&
Kathleen
Kernberger
Napa
Historic
Preservation
Society
nomination
form
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
048678
1993
National
Register
Evaluation
for
Hatt
Building,
Noyes
Lumber
Company
and
Jaekle
Bros.

Planing
Mill
Buildings,
Napa,
California
JRP
Historical
Consulting
Services
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
550
Main
St
Napa
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
10/18/2017
(bentonb)
Last
modified:
10/19/2017
(surgeonj)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
35 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
002544
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
002544
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Model
Railroad
Building
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Model
Railroad
Building
Cross-
refs:

Physically
overlaps
or
intersects
P-
28-
002545
Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Resource
(building)
contains
another
resource
(P-
28-
002545,
model
railroad
exhibt)
within.
[JM
6/03/19]
Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
11/29/2018
Brian
Matuk
Evans
&
De
Shazo
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
052275
2018
Historic
Resource
Evaluation
Of
The
Model
Railroad
Building
And
Model
Railroad
Exhibit
Located
575
3rd
Street,
Napa
County,
California
Evans
&
De
Shazo,
Inc
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
575
3rd
St
Napa
006-
145-
003
94541
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
5/9/2019
(surgeonj)
Last
modified:
6/4/2019
(surgeonj)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
5/13/2019
surgeonj
Notified
submitter.
5/24/2019
murazzoj
Updated
attributes,
quad,
address
Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
36 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
002545
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
002545
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

Model
Railroad
Exhibit
Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
Model
Railroad
Exhibit
Cross-
refs:

Physically
overlaps
or
intersects
P-
28-
002544
Attributes
Resource
type:

Object
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Exhibit
located
inside
of
resource
P-
28-
002544.

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
11/29/2018
Brian
Matuk
Evans
&
De
Shazo
Associated
reports
Report
No.

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
575
3rd
St.

Napa
006-
145-
003
94541
PLSS:

UTMs:

Database
record
metadata
Entered:
5/9/2019
(surgeonj)
Last
modified:
4/7/2021
(neala)
IC
actions:

Date
User
Action
taken
5/13/2019
surgeonj
Notified
submitter.
5/24/2019
murazzoj
Updated
attributes,
quad,
address.

Resource
is
located
inside
building
(P-
28-
002544).

Record
status:

Verified
PDF
status:

GIS
status:

ATTACHMENT 23
Page
37 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
002683
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
002683
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

ARS
08-
020-
02 Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
ARS
08-
020-
02 Other
1215
Silverado
Trail
Other
1236
Juarez
Street
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Not
in
2012
HPD
or
BERD
(prior
to
2022).

Last
image
of
features
in
Google
Earth
3/2016.

NWIC
9/1/2023
yanagig.

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
11/17/2008
Cassandra
Chattan
Archaeological
Resource
Service
From
S-
54200
citation
a,
PDF
page
42 Associated
reports
Report
No.

Year
Title
Affiliation
S-
054200
2008
A
Cultural
Resources
Mitigation
Plan
for
the
Ritz-
Carlton
Napa
Valley
Project,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Archaeological
Resource
Service
Location
information
County:

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
1215
Silverado
Trail
Napa
1219
Silverado
Trail
006-
065-
07 1236
Jaurez
Street
006-
065-
02 PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 563250mE
4239520mN
NAD83
(11/17/2008)
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/1/2023
(YanagiG)
Last
modified:
9/5/2023
(willoughbyl)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
38 of
38 3/27/2025
1:43
PM
Resource
Detail:

P-
28-
002684
Identifying
information
Primary
No.:

P-
28-
002684
Trinomial:

CA-
Name:

ARS-
08-
020-
03 Other
IDs:

Type
Name
Resource
Name
ARS-
08-
020-
03 Other
Foundation
at
northeast
corner
of
Juarez
and
Clay
Streets
Cross-
refs:

Attributes
Resource
type:

Building
Age:

Historic
Information
base:

Surface
survey
Attribute
codes:

Disclosure:

Unrestricted
Collections:

No
Accession
no(s):

Facility:

General
notes
Not
in
2012
HPD
or
BERD
(prior
to
2022).

Last
image
of
features
in
Google
Earth
3/2016.

NWIC
9/1/2023
yanagig.

Recording
events
Date
Recorder(s)
Affiliation
Notes
11/17/2008
Cassandra
Chattan
Archaeological
Research
Service
From
S-
54200
citation
a,
PDF
page

47. Associated
reports
Report
No.

Napa
USGS
quad(s):

Napa
Address:

Address
City
Assessor's
parcel
no.

Zip
code
Juarez
Street
Napa
006-
064-
01 94558
PLSS:

UTMs:

Zone
10 563220mE
4239570mN
NAD83
(11/17/2008)
Database
record
metadata
Entered:
9/1/2023
(YanagiG)
Last
modified:
3/15/2024
(neala)
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
1 of
6 3/27/2025
1:46
PM
Report
List
Report
No.

Other
IDs
Year
Author(s)
Title
Affiliation
Resources
S-
000004
1967
David
A.

Fredrickson
Appraisal
of
the
Archaeological
Resources
of
the
Napa
River
(Trancas
Road
to
Edgerley
Island)
and
Three
Potential
Reservoir
Areas
in
the
Napa
River
Basin
P-
28-
000027,
P-
28-
000218,
P-
28-
000222
S-
000089
1974
Michael
J.

Moratto
An
Archaeological
Survey
of
Possible
Dredge
Spoil
Disposal
Sites
for
the
Napa
River
Channel
Improvements
Project
Archaeological
Research
Laboratory,
San
Francisco
State
University
P-
28-
000027,
P-
28-
000218
S-
001139
1978
Felicia
Gobba
Shinnamon
Archaeological
Impact
Evaluation:

Napa
Creek
Project,
Napa,
California.

S-
001403
1975
Martin
Rosenson
Field
Notes
of
Archaeological
Reconnaissance
Made
on
the
"Chinatown",
NAP-
261,and
NAP-
14 Sites
Situated
Along
the
Napa
River
Basin.

P-
28-
000027,
P-
28-
000218,
P-
28-
000619
S-
008856
1986
Suzanne
Baker
Archaeological
Reconnaissance
of
the
Napa
Transit
Project,
Napa,
California
Archaeological
Consultants
S-
010794
OHP
PRN:

COE890522A
1989
R.

Paul
Hampson
Roberta
S.

Greenwood
Cultural
Resource
Investigation
at
China
Point
Park,
Napa
Greenwood
and
Associates
P-
28-
000619
S-
010794a
1989
Leo
R.

Barker
Research
Design
for
Cultural
Resource
Investigation
at
China
Point
Park,
Napa
and
Cultural
Resource
Investigation
at
China
Point
Park,
Napa
National
Park
Service
S-
010794b
0 Scope
of
Services,
Archaeological
Test
Excavation
Program,
City
of
Napa
Chinatown
Site,
Napa,
California
(Draft)
S-
010794c
1989
Kathryn
Gualtieri
COE
890522A;
Determination
of
Eligibility:

CA-
Nap-
744H,
Napa
Chinatown
Site
[Regulatory
Branch
No,
16521E29]
Office
of
Historic
Preservation
S-
012739
1960
Milton
W.

Stoll,
Jr.

Napa
Valley
Archaeological
Survey
P-
28-
000015,
P-
28-
000016,
P-
28-
000018,
P-
28-
000019,
P-
28-
000020,
P-
28-
000027,
P-
28-
000036,
P-
28-
000037,
P-
28-
000048,
P-
28-
000123,
P-
28-
000129,
P-
28-
000133,
P-
28-
000135,
P-
28-
000136,
P-
28-
000137,
P-
28-
000140,
P-
28-
000151,
P-
28-
000167,
P-
28-
000268,
P-
28-
000826,
P-
28-
000828,
P-
28-
000846,
P-
28-
000847,
P-
28-
000868,
P-
28-
002477,
P-
28-
002568
S-
015511
Submitter:

Oxbow
Project
Area
Cultural
Resources
1993
Thomas
Origer
A
preliminary
archival
research
and
backhoe
investigation
of
the
Oxbow
project
area
within
the
City
of
Napa
(letter
report)
Tom
Origer
and
Associates
P-
28-
001136
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
2 of
6 3/27/2025
1:46
PM
Report
No.

Other
IDs
Year
Author(s)
Title
Affiliation
Resources
S-
015825
1994
Janine
M.

Loyd
Thomas
M.

Origer
An
Archaeological
Survey
of
1356
Calistoga
Avenue,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Tom
Origer
and
Associates
S-
017519
1978
Stephen
A.

Dietz
Archaeological
report
for
Soscol
Avenue,
from
Third
Street
to
Napa
Street,
SS131
(1705-
131)
(letter
report)
Archaeological
Consulting
and
Research
Services,
Inc.

S-
018592
Submitter:

A.R.S.

Project
#96-
42 1996
Katherine
Flynn
A
Cultural
Resources
Evaluation
of
a
Property
Located
at
2020
Clay
Street
in
the
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County
Archaeological
Resource
Service
S-
023097
1999
Colin
I.

Busby
Melody
E.

Tannam
Donna
M.

Garaventa
Historic
Property
Survey
Report,
Third
Street
(
Bridge
21C-
12)
Over
the
Napa
River
Replacement
Project,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
California
Department
of
Transportation
District
4 Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

P-
28-
001880
S-
023097a
1999
Colin
I.

Busby
Positive
Archaeological
Survey
Report
Third
Street
Bridge
(Bridge
21C-
12)
Over
the
Napa
River
Replacement
Project,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Basin
Research
Associates,
inc.

S-
023097b
1999
Stephen
D.

Mikesell
Draft,
Bridge
Evaluations
Bridge
21C-
96,
First
Street
Over
Napa
Creek
Bridge
21C-
91,
First
Street
Over
Napa
River
Over
Flow
Bridge
21C-
12,
Third
Street
over
Napa
River
Napa
County,
California
JRP
Historical
Consulting
Services
S-
023413
2000
Katherine
S.

Flynn
Archaeological
Survey
Report
for
the
Jefferson/Clay
Street
Signal
Installation
and
Improvements,
Federal
Aid
Project
No.

STPL-
5042
(024)
in
the
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
(04-
NAP-
0 P.M.

Nap)
Archaeological
Resource
Service
S-
024386
Submitter:

Technical
Report
01-
52 2001
Matt
Bischoff
Matthew
Sterner
Historic
Context
for
and
Evaluation
of
the
Napa
Valley
Railroad
Statistical
Research,
Inc.

P-
28-
000966,
P-
28-
001157
S-
024719
Voided:

S-
26207
2001
Robert
Cartier
Cultural
Resource
Evaluation
for
the
Napa
Hotel
Project
in
the
City
of
Napa,
California
Archaeological
Resource
Management
P-
28-
001178
S-
024719a
2002
Robert
Cartier
Archaeological
Testing
Program
for
the
Napa
Hotel
Project
in
the
City
of
Napa,
California
Archaeological
Resource
Management
S-
024719b
2008
Robert
R.

Cartier
Updated
Archaeological
Testing
Program
for
the
River
House
Resort
Project
in
the
City
Of
Napa,
California
Archaeological
Resource
Management
S-
024968
2000
Robert
Harmon
Technical
Report
for
Archaeological
Resources
Initial
Study,
Soscol
Avenue
Bridge
(Bridge
21C-
126)
Over
the
Napa
River
Bypass,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

S-
028617
OHP
PRN:

FEMA
040610A
2004
Cultural
Resources
Technical
Report,
Borreo
Building
Retrofit,
City
of
Napa,
DPMC-
PJ-
09-
CA-
2003-
019
URS
Corporation
P-
28-
001238
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
3 of
6 3/27/2025
1:46
PM
Report
No.

Other
IDs
Year
Author(s)
Title
Affiliation
Resources
S-
028983
2004
Ward
Hill
Historic
Architecture
Report,
1410
Seminary
Street,
City
of
Napa
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

P-
28-
001248
S-
029242
Submitter:

Project
QA166-
64/04
2004
Sunshine
Psota
A
Cultural
Resources
Study
of
the
Proposed
North
Napa
Siphon
and
Pipeline
Project,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California.

Anthropological
Studies
Center,
Sonoma
State
University
P-
28-
000966
S-
030595
2004
Archaeological
Testing
and
National
Register
Re-
Evaluation,
CA-
NAP-
744H
(P-
28-
000619),
Napa
Chinatown
and
Vicinity,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Basin
Research
Associates,
Inc.

P-
28-
000619,
P-
28-
001019
S-
030902
2005
Andrew
Hope
Historic
Resource
Evaluation
Report,
Re-
Evaluation
of
the
Main
Street
Bridge
in
Napa,
Napa
County
(Bridge
21C0044)
California
Department
of
Transportation
P-
28-
001327
S-
030905
OHP
PRN:

FHWA030430X
OHP
PRN:

DOE
49-
04-
0002-
0000
2003
Stacie
Ham
Caltrans
Statewide
Historic
Bridge
Update
-
Survey
and
Evaluation
of
Masonry
Arch
Bridges
California
Department
of
Transportation
P-
28-
001019,
P-
28-
001190,
P-
28-
001291,
P-
28-
001292,
P-
28-
001294,
P-
28-
001295,
P-
28-
001296,
P-
28-
001297,
P-
28-
001298,
P-
28-
001299,
P-
28-
001300,
P-
28-
001301,
P-
28-
001302,
P-
28-
001303,
P-
28-
001304,
P-
28-
001305,
P-
28-
001306,
P-
28-
001307,
P-
28-
001308,
P-
28-
001309,
P-
28-
001310,
P-
28-
001311,
P-
28-
001312,
P-
28-
001313,
P-
28-
001314,
P-
28-
001315,
P-
28-
001316,
P-
28-
001317,
P-
49-
002863,
P-
49-
003294,
P-
49-
003295,
P-
49-
003296,
P-
49-
003298
S-
030905a
2004
Stephen
E.

Mikesell
FHWA030430X;
Survey
and
Evaluation
of
Masonry
Arch
Bridges
-
Caltrans
Statewide
Historic
Bridge
Survey
Update
Office
Historic
Preservation
S-
033061
Submitter:

SWCA
Cultural
Resources
Report
Database
No.
06-
507
Submitter:

SWCA
Report
No.
10715-
180
2006
Nancy
Sikes
Cindy
Arrington
Bryon
Bass
Chris
Corey
Kevin
Hunt
Steve
O'Neil
Catherine
Pruett
Tony
Sawyer
Michael
Tuma
Leslie
Wagner
Alex
Wesson
Cultural
Resources
Final
Report
of
Monitoring
and
Findings
for
the
Qwest
Network
Construction
Project,
State
of
California
SWCA
Environmental
Consultants
P-
01-
000027,
P-
01-
000040,
P-
01-
000087,
P-
01-
000088,
P-
01-
000089,
P-
01-
000090,
P-
07-
000138,
P-
27-
000802,
P-
27-
001191,
P-
27-
001207,
P-
28-
000467,
P-
43-
000106,
P-
43-
000141,
P-
43-
000449,
P-
43-
000573,
P-
43-
000575,
P-
43-
000754,
P-
43-
000928,
P-
43-
001071,
P-
48-
000208,
P-
48-
000211,
P-
48-
000214,
P-
48-
000441,
P-
48-
000549,
P-
49-
001583,
P-
57-
000194,
P-
57-
000198,
P-
57-
000297,
P-
57-
000301,
P-
57-
000307
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
4 of
6 3/27/2025
1:46
PM
Report
No.

Other
IDs
Year
Author(s)
Title
Affiliation
Resources
S-
033061a
2006
Cultural
Resources
Final
Report
of
Monitoring
and
Findings
for
the
Qwest
Network
Construction
Project,
State
of
California
SWCA
Environmental
Consultants
S-
033061b
2007
Nancy
E.

Sikes
Final
Report
of
Monitoring
and
Findings
for
the
Qwest
Network
Construction
Project
(letter
report)
SWCA
Environmental
Consultants
S-
034513
Submitter:

Project
Name:
849
Jackson
Submitter:

Project
Number:

SF18860A
2008
Dana
E.

Supernowicz
New
Tower
("NT")
Submission
Packet,
FCC
Form
620,
849
Jackson,
SF18860A
Earth
Touch,
Inc.,
Historic
Resource
Associates
P-
28-
001438
S-
034513a
2008
Cultural
Resources
Study
of
849
Jackson
Project
Metro
PCS
Site
No.

SF-
18860A
849
Jackson
Street,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
94559
Historic
Resource
Associates
S-
034685
Submitter:

Technical
Report
03-
55 Agency
Nbr:

HAER
No.

CA-
322
2003
Matthew
A.

Sterner
Scott
Thompson
Cultural
Resources
Data
Recovery
of
a
Portion
of
the
Napa
Valley
Wine
Train
Rail
Line,
Napa
County,
California
Statistical
Research,
Inc.

P-
28-
000966,
P-
28-
001547
S-
034685a
2003
Matt
C.

Bischoff
Matthew
A.

Sterner
Scott
Thompson
Historic
American
Engineering
Record
for
the
Napa
Valley
Railroad
Bridge
Statistical
Research,
Inc.

S-
036531
2009
S.

Joe
Griffin
Archaeological
Survey
of
Approximately

4.5 Acres
Along
Napa
Creek
in
Napa
County,
California,
for
the
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
(NCBSP)
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
P-
28-
000619,
P-
28-
001019,
P-
28-
001295,
P-
28-
001296,
P-
28-
001297,
P-
28-
001298
S-
038402
OHP
PRN:

COE940104A
2011
Melissa
Montag
Napa
Creek
Flood
Control
Project
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers
P-
28-
001614
S-
038617
2012
Shannon
Mahoney
Leslie
Fryman
Archaeological
Testing
of
CA-
NAP-
1099H,
Napa
Creek
Bank
Stabilization
Project
ASM
Affiliates
P-
28-
001613,
P-
28-
001614
S-
038617a
2011
Archaeological
Testing
Plan
for
the
Napa
Flood
Control
Project
ASM
Affiliates
S-
038617b
2011
Joe
Griffin
Milford
Wayne
Donaldson
Jeff
W.

Brooke
Section
106
consultation
for
the
post-
review
discovery
of
a
historic
archaeological
deposit
encountered
during
work
on
the
Napa
River/Napa
Creek
Flood
Control
Project
U.S.

Army
Corps
of
Engineers;
California
Office
of
Historic
Preservation
S-
045662
Submitter:
310346
2014
Carolyn
Losee
Cultural
Resources
Investigation
for
AT&T
CA4017
"Napa
Valley
Expo"
575
Third
Street,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
94559
(letter
report)
Archaeological
Resources
Technology
S-
045662a
2015
Stephen
Geist
FCC
Form
620
New
Tower
Submission
Packet,
Proposed
New
Monotree,
Horizon
Tower
#CA4017,
Horizon
Tower
Site
Name:

Napa
Valley
Expo,
575
Third
Street,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California,
94559,
GE2G
Project
Number
310346
Geist
Engineering
&
Environmental
Group,
Inc.

GE2G
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
5 of
6 3/27/2025
1:46
PM
Report
No.

Other
IDs
Year
Author(s)
Title
Affiliation
Resources
S-
046614
Submitter:

SF33XC812E
2015
Lorna
Billat
Collocation
("CO")
Submission
Packet,
Downtown
Napa,
Project
No.

SF33XC812E
EarthTouch,
Inc.

P-
28-
001835
S-
046614a
2014
Dana
E.

Supernowicz
Architectural
Evaluation
Study
of
the
Downtown
Napa
Project,
Sprint
Site
No.

SF33XC812E,
1300
Clay
Street,
Napa
County,
California
Historic
Resource
Associates
S-
047946
OHP
PRN:

FCC_2015_1102_010
2015
Carrie
D.

Wills
Kathleen
Crawford
FCC
Form
621
Collocation
Submission
Packet:

BA00389A
(SF389
Napa
AT&T),
1300
Clay
Street,
Napa,
CA
94559
Environmental
Assessment
Specialists,
Inc.

P-
28-
001835
S-
047946a
2015
Carrie
D.

Wills
Kathleen
A.

Crawford
Cultural
Resources
Records
Search
and
Site
Visit
Results
for
T-
Mobile
West,
LLC
Candidate
BA00389A
(SF389
Napa
AT&T)
1300
Clay
Street,
Napa
County,
Napa,
California
(letter
report)
Environmental
Assessment
Specialists,
Inc.

S-
047946b
2015
Carrie
D.

Wills
Kathleen
A.

Crawford
Direct
APE
Historic
Architectural
Assessment
for
T-
Mobile
West,
LLC
Candidate
BA00389A
(SF389
Napa
AT&T)
1300
Clay
Street,
Napa
County,
Napa,
California
(letter
report)
Environmental
Assessment
Specialists,
Inc.

S-
047946c
2015
Julianne
Polanco
FCC_2015_1102_010;
BA00389A
(SF389
Napa
AT&T)
1300
Clay
Street,
Napa,
Collocation
Office
of
Historic
Preservation
S-
048576
Caltrans:

CML-
5042(057)
2016
Samantha
Murray
Historic
Property
Survey
Report;
California
Boulevard
Roundabouts
Project,
City
&
County
of
Napa,
CA
Dudek
P-
28-
001863,
P-
28-
001864,
P-
28-
001865,
P-
28-
001866,
P-
28-
001867,
P-
28-
001868
S-
048576a
2016
Samantha
Murray
Historical
Resources
Evaluation
Report
for
the
California
Boulevard
Roundabouts
Project,
City
&
County
of
Napa,
CA
Dudeck
S-
048576b
2016
Samantah
Murray
Archaeological
Survey
Report
for
the
California
Boulevard
Roundabouts
Project,
City
&
County
of
Napa,
CA
Dudek
S-
048576c
2016
William
Burns
Adam
Giacinto
Micah
Hale
Samantha
Murray
Extended
Phase
1 Proposal
for
the
California
Boulevard
Roundabouts
Project
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
CA
Dudek
S-
048576d
2016
Adam
Giacinto
Micah
Hale
Samantha
Murray
Extended
Phase
1 Report
for
the
California
Boulevard
Roundabouts
Project
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
CA
Dudek
S-
048576e
2016
Samantha
Murray
Finding
of
No
Adverse
Effect
with
Standard
Conditions
for
the
California
Boulevard
Roundabouts
Project,
City
&
County
of
Napa,
CA
Dudek
S-
048678
Other:

Purchase
Order:

DACW05-
92-
P-
2408
1993
National
Register
Evaluation
for
Hatt
Building,
Noyes
Lumber
Company
and
Jaekle
Bros.

Planing
Mill
Buildings,
Napa,
California
JRP
Historical
Consulting
Services
P-
28-
002440
S-
049120
2011
Alta
Heights
Historic
Context
Statement
and
Survey
Report,
Napa,
California
Architectural
Resources
Group
558
Associated
Resources
ATTACHMENT 23
Page
6 of
6 3/27/2025
1:46
PM
Report
No.

Other
IDs
Year
Author(s)
Title
Affiliation
Resources
S-
052275
2018
Brian
Matuk
Stacey
De
Shazo
Historic
Resource
Evaluation
Of
The
Model
Railroad
Building
And
Model
Railroad
Exhibit
Located
575
3rd
Street,
Napa
County,
California
Evans
&
De
Shazo,
Inc
P-
28-
002544,
P-
28-
002545
S-
054200
Submitter:

A.R.S.

Project
08-
020
2008
William
Roop
A
Cultural
Resources
Mitigation
Plan
for
the
Ritz-
Carlton
Napa
Valley
Project,
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Archaeological
Resource
Service
P-
28-
001178,
P-
28-
002683,
P-
28-
002684
S-
054200a
2008
Cassandra
Chattan
Historic
Structures
Evaluation
of
the
Napa
Ritz-
Carlton
Project.

ARS
08-
020
Archaeological
Resource
Service
S-
054200b
2009
Jeff
A.

Parsons
Geochemistry
And
Geoarchaeological
Evaluation
Of
Thirteen
Soil
Samples
From
Prehistoric
Site
NAP-
928,
City
Of
Napa,
California
Jeff
A.

Parsons
Geoarchaeology
S-
054200c
2010
Sally
Evans
William
Roop
The
Ritz-
Carlton,
Napa
Valley
Project,
Historic
Property
Evaluation
Report
for
CA-
NAP-
928,
City
of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Archaeological
Resource
Service
S-
054200d
2013
William
Roop
Historic
Property
Treatment
Plan
(HPTP)
For
Ca-
NAP-
928,
City
Of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
Archaeological
Resource
Service
S-
054200e
2020
C.

Jesse
Phillips
Bruno
Texier
Trish
Fernandez
Al
Schwitalla
Richard
Terk
Dana
DePietro
Final
Technical
Report
And
Results
Of
The
Data
Recovery
Plan
For
The
Historic
Property
Treatment
Plan
For
Ca-
Nap-
928,
City
Of
Napa,
Napa
County,
California
InContext,
FirstCarbon
Solutions
ATTACHMENT 23
Local Government Tribal Consultation List Request

Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100

West Sacramento, CA 95691

916
-
373
-
3710

916
-
373
-
5471
–
Fax

[email protected]

Type of List Requested

☐

CEQA Tribal Consultation List (AB 52)
– P
er Public
Resources Code § 21080.3.1, sub
s. (b), (d)
, (e) and 2108

0.3 .2

☐

General Plan (SB 18)
- P
er Government Code
§ 65352.3.

Local Action Type:

___

General Plan

___

General Pla
n Element

___
General
Plan Amendment

___
Specific Plan

___
Specific Plan Amendment

___
Pre
-
planning Outreach Activity

Required Information

Project Title:
____________________________________________________________________ ________

Local Government/Lead Agency:
_________________________________________________________ __

Contact Person:
____________________________________________________________________ ______

Street Address:
_____________________________________________________________________ ______

City:
_____
________________________________________________
Zip:
__________________________

Phone:
_________________________________
___
Fax:
_______________________________________
__

Email:
_____________________________________________

Specific Area Subject to Proposed Action

County:
__
______________________________

City/Community:
_______________________
_
___

Project Description:

Additional Request

☐

Sacred Lands File Search
-
Required Information:

USGS Quadrangle Name
(s):
_
___________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________

Township:
_______
____________

Range:
________
__
_
__
_
_____

Section(s):
___
________________

ATTACHMENT 23
6 1 4 5 0 0 0 1 " 0 3 / 2 0 2 5 | 6 1 4 5 0 0 0 1 _ r e c o r d _ se a r c h . m xd R e c o r d S e a r c h M a p
R a d i us S o ur c e : U S G S N a p a 7 . 5 ' Q ua d r a n g l e / T 0 5 N R 0 4 W S e c 2 , 3 , 1 0 , 1 1 P r o j e c t S i t e S o ur c e : U S G S N a p a 7 . 5 ' Q ua d r a n g l e / T 0 5 N R 0 4 W S e c 1 0 C I T Y O F N A P A
F I R S T S T R E E T N A P A P H A S E I I P R O J E C T 1 , 0 0 0
0
1 , 0 0 0
5 0 0
F e e t
Project Area
Half-Mile Radius
••
•
FCS
An
ADEC
Innovation
ATTACHMENT 23

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Gavin Newsom,
Governor

NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page
1 of

2 March 28, 2025

Dr. Dana Douglas DePietro

City of Napa

Via Email to: ddepietro@fcs
-
intl.com

Re:

Native American Tribal Consultation, Pursuant to the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), Amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014), Public
Resources Code Sections 5097.94 (m), 21073, 21074, 21080.3.1, 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2 and 21084.3,
First Street Napa Phase II Project, Napa County

To Whom It May Concern:

Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (c), attached is a consultation list of tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the above -
listed
project. Please note that the intent of the AB 52 amendments to CEQA is to avoid and/or mitigate impacts to tribal cultural resources, (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)) (“Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource.”)

Public Resources Code sections 21080.3.1 and 21084.3(c) require CEQA lead agencies to consult with California Native American tribes that have requested notice from such agencies of proposed projects in the geographic area that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the tribes on projects for which a Notice of Preparation or Notice of Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration has been filed on or after July 1, 2015. Specifically, Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (d) provides:

Within 14 days of determining that an application for a project is complete or a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, the lead agency shall provide formal notification to the designated contact of, or a tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, which shall be accomplished by means of at least one written notification that includes a brief description of the proposed project and its location, the lead agency contact information, and a notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation pursuant to this section.

The AB 52 amendments to CEQA law does not preclude initiating consultation with the tribes that are culturally and traditionally affiliated within your jurisdiction prior to receiving requests for notification of projects in the tribe’s areas of traditional and cultural affiliation. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) recommends, but does not require, early consultation as a best practice to ensure that lead agencies receive sufficient information about cultural resources in a project area to avoid damaging effects to tribal cultural resources.

The NAHC also recommends, but does not require that agencies should also include with their notification letters, information regarding any cultural resources assessment that has been completed on the area of potential effect (APE), such as:

1. The results of any record search that may have been conducted at an Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS), including, but not limited to:

HAIRPERSON

Reginald Pagaling

Chumash

V
ICE
-
C

HAIRPERSON

Buffy McQuillen

Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

ECRETARY

Sara Dutschke

Miwok

ARLIAMENTARIAN

Wayne Nelson

Luiseño

OMMISSIONER

Isaac Bojorquez

Ohlone
-
Costanoan

OMMISSIONER

Stanley Rodriguez

Kumeyaay

OMMISSIONER

Reid Milanovich

Cahuilla

OMMISSIONER

Bennae Calac

Pauma
-
Yuima Band of
Luiseño Indians

OMMISSIONER

Vacant

A
CTING
E

XECUTIVE
S

ECRETARY

S
TEVEN
Q
UINN

NAHC

HEADQUARTERS

1550 Harbor Boulevard

Suite 100

West Sacramento,
California 95691

(916) 373
-
3710

[email protected]

ATTACHMENT 23

Page
2 of
2 •

A listing of any and all known cultural resources that have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE, such as known archaeological sites;

•

Copies of any and all cultural resource records and study reports that may have been provided by the Information Center as part of the records search response;

•

Whether the records search indicates a low, moderate, or high probability that unrecorded cultural resources are located in the APE; and

•

If a survey is recommended by the Information Center to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present.

2. The results of any archaeological inventory survey that was conducted, including:

•

Any report that may contain site forms, site significance, and suggested mitigation measures.

All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure in accordance with Government Code section 6254.10.

3. The result of
the

Sacred Lands File (SLF) check conducted through the Native American Heritage Commission was
positive
. Please contact the
Mishewal
-
Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley

on the attached list for more
information.

4. Any ethnographic studies conducted for any area including all or part of the APE; and

5. Any geotechnical reports regarding all or part of the APE.

Lead agencies should be aware that records maintained by the NAHC and CHRIS are not exhaustive and a negative response to these searches does not preclude the existence of a tribal cultural resource. A tribe may be the only source of information regarding the existence of a tribal cultural resource.

This information will aid tribes in determining whether to request formal consultation. In the event that they do, having the information beforehand will help to facilitate the consultation process.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify the NAHC. With your assistance, we can assure that our consultation list remains current.

If you have any questions, please contact me at my email address:

[email protected]

Sincerely,

Melina Carlos

Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

ATTACHMENT 23
County
Tribe Name
Fed (F)
Non-Fed (N)
Contact Person
Contact Address
Phone #
Fax #
Email Address
Cultural Affiliation
Guidiville Rancheria of California
F
Bunny Tarin, Tribal Administrator
PO Box 339
Talmage, CA, 95481
(707) 462-3682
[email protected]
Pomo
Guidiville Rancheria of California
F
Michael Derry, Historian
PO Box 339
Talmage, CA, 95481
(707) 391-1665
Pomo
Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander
Valley
N
Scott Gabaldon, Chairperson
2275 Silk Road
Windsor, CA, 95492
(707) 494-9159
[email protected]
Wappo
Mishewal-Wappo Tribe of Alexander
Valley
N
Christi Gabaldon, Tribal Monitor
7095 Saint Helena Rd
Santa Rosa, CA, 95404
(707) 889-1423
[email protected]
Wappo
Pinoleville Pomo Nation
F
Leona Willams, Chairperson
500 B Pinoleville Drive
Ukiah, CA, 95482
(707) 463-1454
(707) 463-6601
Pomo
Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation
F
James Kinter, Tribal Secretary
P.O. Box 18
Brooks, CA, 95606
(530) 908-7564
[email protected]
Patwin
Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation
F
Yvonne Perkins, THPO, Cultural
Resources Chairman
P.O. Box 18
Brooks, CA, 95606
(530) 796-3400
[email protected]
Patwin
Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation
F
Anthony Roberts, Chairperson
P.O. Box 18
Brooks, CA, 95606
(530) 796-3400
[email protected]
Patwin
Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation
F
Leland Kinter, Tribal Treasurer
P.O. Box 18
Brooks, CA, 95606
(530) 908-2902
[email protected]
Patwin
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
Napa County
3/28/2025
Counties
Last Updated
Napa
Alameda,Contra
Costa,Lake,Marin,Mendocino,Napa,Sacrament
o,San Joaquin,Solano,Sonoma
6/21/2023
Alameda,Contra
Costa,Lake,Marin,Mendocino,Napa,Sacrament
o,San Joaquin,Solano,Sonoma
6/21/2023
Lake,Napa,Sonoma
1/31/2024
Lake,Napa,Sonoma
1/31/2024
Lake,Mendocino,Napa,Sonoma
Colusa,Lake,Napa,Sacramento,Solano,Sutter,
Yolo
11/6/2023
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for consultation with Native American tribes under Public Resources Code Sections 21080.3.1 for the proposed First Street Napa Phase II Project, Napa County.

Record: PROJ-2025-001702
Report Type: AB52 GIS
Counties: Napa
NAHC Group: All
Colusa,Lake,Napa,Sacramento,Solano,Sutter,
Yolo
11/6/2023
Colusa,Lake,Napa,Sacramento,Solano,Sutter,
Yolo
11/6/2023
Colusa,Lake,Napa,Sacramento,Solano,Sutter,
Yolo
11/6/2023
03/28/2025 04:54 PM
1 of 1
I
+
ATTACHMENT 23
First Street Napa Phase II Project

Initial Study/
Addendum

FCS

APPENDIX F:

VMT and Trip Generation Assessment

ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23

490 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 201 Santa Rosa, CA 95401 707.542.9500 w-
trans.com

SANTA ROSA • OAKLAND

May 1, 2025

Mr. Jason Brandman

First Carbon Solutions

2999 Oak Road, Suite 250

Walnut Creek, CA 94597

First Street Napa Phase II VMT and Trip Generation Assessment

Dear Mr.

Brandman
;
As requested,
W-
Trans has prepared a focused transportation assessment for the proposed First Street Napa Phase II project in the City of Napa. The purpose of this letter is to
assess the anticipated Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
and vehicular trip generation characteristics of the proposed project, with the information to
be used in support
of an addendum to the 2012
Downtown Napa Specific Plan EIR

that is being prepared by First Carbon Solutions.

Project Description

The proposed project is within the boundaries of the Downtown Napa Specific Plan area
and is envisioned
in
the
Specific Plan to be redeveloped. The site is generally bounded by Main Street, Coombs Street, Pearl Street, and First Street in downtown Napa. The predominant
existing
use on the site is a

67,356 square foot

Kohl’s department
store that closed in March 2025; 8,612 square feet of combined smaller retail/restaurant uses are also present on the site
. The First Street Napa Phase II development would in
clude demolition of the existing building
s
and
reconfiguration of adjacent public and private spaces,
adding

up to 78 for
-
sale branded residential units
, up to
16 1
hotel rooms, and up to 30,000 square feet of retail. Approximately half of the retail

portion

would be accessory
spaces related to the project’s hotel and residential uses with the remainder being standalone commercial space.

VMT Assessment

VMT Thresholds of Significance

Source of VMT Data

VMT projections for the City of Napa
we
re obtained from the Solano Napa
Activity
-
Based Model, or SNABM, which
is the regional travel demand model jointly operated by the Napa Valley Transportation Authority (NVTA) and Solano Transportation Authority (STA). VMT data obtained from the SNABM is used to assess the potential transp
ortation impacts associated with development projects in the City of Napa and has also been used in the preparation of environmental documents for program
-
level plans including the City of Napa 2040 General Plan EIR.

City
-
Adopted Thresholds

The City of Napa adopted the following VMT thresholds of significance for analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA in May 2021:

•

Residential Projects: A proposed project exceeding a level of 15 percent below existing regional VMT per capita may indicate a significant transportation impact.

•

Office Projects: A proposed project exceeding a level of 15 percent below existing regional VMT per employee may indicate a significant transportation impact.

•

Retail Projects: A net increase in total VMT may indicate a significant transportation impact.

Consistent with this policy, the City of Napa 2040 General Plan EIR applied a residential significance threshold equal to 14.70 VMT per capita, which is 15 percent below the Napa countywide average of 17.30 VMT per capita ,
~
~-Trans
ATTACHMENT 23
M
r
.

Jason Brandman

Page
2 May 1, 2025

and an o
ffice/
e
mployment
significance

threshold equal to 22.87 VMT per employee, which is 15 percent below the Napa countywide average of 26.90 VMT per employee.

Retail Threshold and Screening

Both the City of Napa and the
Technical Advisory

on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA
, California
Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), 2018 (referred to herein as the Technical Advisory
)

establish the
retail VMT significance threshold as a net increase in total VMT.

In its recommended thresholds for retail uses, the
Technical Advisory

indicates that, unlike regional retail, local
-
serving retail development typically redistributes
shopping trips rather than creating new trips, noting tha t “lead agencies generally may presume such
development creates a less
-
than
-
significant transportation impact.” The document continues by noting, “Generally, however, retail development including stores larger than 50,000 square feet might be considered re
gional
-
serving, and so lead agencies should undertake an analysis to determine whether the project might increase or decrease VMT.” Most jurisdictions have used the 50,000 square foot retail size cited by OPR as the maximum amount of retail, or in some cas
es the maximum tenant size, that may qualify for local
-
serving retail
screening. For the purposes of the proposed First Street Napa Phase II project, retail

VMT was assessed in
consideration of whether
such

uses would be considered local
-
serving, thereby qualifying for screening from
quantitative VMT analysis per the guidance set forth in the Technical Advisory
.

Applied Threshold for Hotel Uses

Thresholds for
land use

types
other than residential, employment or retail
are
determined

on a case
-
by
-
case basis
,
typically relying on guidance contained in the

Technical Advisory
,
as well as consideration of how similar uses have
been assessed in other jurisdictions
.

Neither Napa’s adopted VMT significance thresholds nor the Technical
Advisory

address how hotel and lodging type uses should be assessed. Over the five years since VMT became a mandatory component of transportation CEQA analyses, the most common approach to assessing hotel VMT has been to treat the land use similar to retail, quali
tatively analyzing the potential to increase total VMT at the regional level. Some jurisdictions have also chosen to quantitatively analyze the employment -
based VMT
components

of
hotels
,

either instead of or in addition to a qualitative assessment of effec ts on regional VMT.

Th
e
conservative
approach
of examining total VMT qualitatively as well as hotel employee VMT quantitatively is consistent with
that used for a similar downtown Napa hotel, as detailed in the Transportation Impact Study for the First and Oxbow
Gateway Project
, W
-
Trans,
2023 and

has therefore been chosen for application in this analysis.

The
proposed First Street Napa Phase II project includes residential ownership
units that will be
branded and
managed by the hotel. The travel and VMT characteristics of these units would likely vary

by occupant type
; travel
by owners and other long
-
term stay occupants would be similar to downtown Napa residents, while travel by short
-
term stay
occupants

would be similar to that generated by hotel guests. For the purposes of this analysis, the potential VMT characteristics associated with both occupant type s were assessed.

Project VMT Assessment

Residential VMT

The proposed project site spans two traffic analysis zones (TAZ) in the SNABM model, with about one -
third of the
project in TAZ 82 and two
-
thirds in TAZ 89. Given the lack of existing residential uses in this part of downtown Napa, the model includes no re
sidential VMT data in these TAZs. Therefore, residential VMT data was estimated by calculating the weighted average VMT per capita for the ten downtown Napa TAZs surrounding the project site
; weighting was applied using the number of residents in each TAZ as contained in the SNABM model
. The
resulting
weighted average VMT per capita was calculated to be 9.37 miles. Since the weighted average VMT per capita is less than the 14.70 VMT per capita significance threshold for residential uses, the residential component of the proposed project would be conside
red to have a less
-
than
-
significant VMT impact. An exhibit showing the
downtown Napa TAZ boundaries along with their corresponding VMT per capita projections is enclosed. It is noted that the entire downtown N
apa area including all ten TAZs used to determine the weighted average fall ATTACHMENT 23
M
r
.

Jason Brandman

Page
3 May 1, 2025

below the residential VMT significance threshold
, providing additional evidence that downtown Napa is a VMT -
efficient area for residential uses.

Because the residential component of the project would be co -
branded with the hotel with the potential for units
to occasionally be used for short
-
term guest stays, the VMT characteristics associated with these

units may
at times
be

more like

that associated with hotel guests

than residents
. Such hotel
-
type VMT attributes are addressed in the
following section.

Hotel Guest VMT

Hotels and other visitor
-
focused uses require consideration of the project’s
expected

customer base and where
those customers would otherwise have stayed if the project were not constructed.

Hotels that

include a major
new attraction
,

facilities for larger
convention
s, or resort amenities that in and of themselves are a primary reason for guest choices in visiting the area may potentially generate new VMT in the region. Adding new hotel rooms to an area where average hotel occupancy rates are indicative of frequent sold
-
out conditions
, thereby allowing
latent visitor demand to
fill the new rooms without affecting occupancy at other properties,

may also potentially
lead to increased regional VMT.

For the remaining types of lodging uses, however, adding new room capacity is unlikely to draw new visitors to
the
area
;
rather, the addition of new rooms tends to simply

redistribute where visitors stay. This shift in travel
patterns and VMT is similar to how retail uses

are

recommended to be

treated in the
Technical Advisory
, in which
many types of retail projects may generally be presumed to have a less -
than
-
significant VMT impact since the total
amount of shopping that occurs in a given geographic area tends to remain unchanged, and in fact adding new
retail uses to the urban fabric often reduces the distances (i.e., the “miles” in VMT) that people need to drive on shopping trips.

The addition of a new hotel in downtown Napa would not directly increase the total amount of lodging demand in the region.

As of December 2024, the six
-
month moving average hotel occupancy rate in the City of Napa was 65 percent
1 , and based on an article in the North Bay Business Journal, hotel occupancy rates during the August 2024 peak season were approximately 71 percent in Napa County as a whole 2 .

These occupancy rates indicate

that there is not an untapped demand s
uch

that adding new lodging would by itself generate new vehicular travel to the area.

The addition of new lodging may, however, shift where some guests to the Napa Valley region choose to stay. The project site is centrally located among many of the region’s primary visitor attractions, and its location in downtown Napa would also be conven
ient to those traveling to the area on business. As such, the project could potentially
reduce total regional VMT if it results in guests finding lodging opportunities closer to their primary destinations rather than having to stay in less
-
central location
s that require longer driving distances. This potential VMT reduction effect would be further pronounced if guests currently choosing to make day trip s

to Napa from
locations such as San Francisco, Sacramento, and San Jose instead choose to stay overnight given the convenience and appeal of the project’s location.

The proposed project
site
is also located in an area with well
-
developed

1 https://www.cityofnapa.org/1172/Economic
-
Development
-
Dashboard
, accessed March 24, 2025

2 https://www.northbaybusinessjournal.com/article/industrynews/visit -
napa
-
valley
-
spending
-
tourism/#:~:text=Hotel%20occupancy%20in%20Napa%20County,up%204.8%25%20from%20August%202023 .
,
accessed March 24, 2025

ATTACHMENT 23
Mr
.

Jason Brandman

Page
4 May 1, 2025

pedestrian and bicycle networks, is located within walking distance of numerous downtown Napa shops, services, and restaurants, and is one
-
half

mile
walking distance
from the Soscol Gateway Transit center at which local and regional transit routes can be accessed. The project also proposes to further enhance pedestrian circulation by adding a new crosswalk on Main Street and renovating the Brown Street corridor to provide enhanced pedestrian and streetscape amenities.

Th
e existing and expanded
-
upon
availabi
lity of non
-
auto travel
facilities in the project
vicinity and downtown would be expected to reduce the level of auto travel and VMT generated by hotel guests, particularly the short
-
to
-
mid
-
length
trips
that
hotel guests often make during the day
.

Given these conditions, the project can reasonably be presumed to result in a less -
than
-
significant VMT impact
associated with
hotel
guest travel.

Hotel Employee VMT

As shown on the enclosed map, t
he proposed project site
spans two small downtown Napa TAZs in

the SNABM
model
. However, the project’s hotel component where employee activity would be based

is contained within only
the southern zone, TAZ 89. VMT data from TAZ 89 was therefore used to assess hotel
employee VMT. The reported
average VMT per employee in the TAZ is

16.70 miles. Since the reported VMT per employee in project’s TAZ is less than the 22.87 VMT per employee significance threshold,

the employment
-
based VMT associated with the hotel

would be considered to have a less
-
than
-
significant VMT impact.

Retail VMT

The VMT associated with the proposed project’s retail uses was assessed in consideration guidance set forth in the Technical Advisory
. Because the proposed retail uses are less than 50,000 square feet, and more importantly, would be oriented toward downtown Napa visitors, employees, and lodging residents, such uses would be considered local
-
serving and presumed to have a less
-
than
-
signi
ficant VMT impact. It is also noted that approximately half of the project’s retail/commercial space is anticipated to consist of uses that are ancillary to the hotel.

Summary of VMT Findings

A summary of the VMT assessment completed for each of the project’s various components is shown in Table 1
.

Table
1 –

Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Summary

Project
Component

Threshold

Proposed Project

Impact?

Branded Residential Units

Treated as Residential

14.70 VMT per capita (15 percent below
countywide average 17.30 VMT per capita)

9.37 VMT per capita

LTS

Treated as Hotel

Net Increase in Hotel Guest Regional VMT

No
increase in

regional VMT

LTS

Hotel

Hotel
Guest VMT

Net Increase in Hotel Guest Regional VMT

No increase in

regional VMT

LTS

Hotel
Employee VMT

22.87 VMT per employee (15 percent below
c
ountywide
a
verage 26.90 VMT per employee)

16.70 VMT per
employee

LTS

Retail

Net Increase in Total Regional VMT

Screened
-

no increase
in regional VMT

LTS

Note: LTS = Less than significant

Finding
–
The proposed project is expected to have a less
-
than
-
significant VMT impact.

ATTACHMENT 23
M
r
.

Jason Brandman

Page
5 May 1, 2025

Project
Trip Generatio
n

The change in the number of automobile trips that are generated by a project as compared to existing uses can provide insight into the effect a land use change will have on

localized traffic congestion.

The additional
vehicle
trips

generated by a project can affect

traffic congestion,
which is
typically measured at intersections using a Level
of Service (LOS) metric
. While a project’s effects on congestion and LOS

are

not considered in CEQA
, they often
remain o
f interest to the community and decision makers
. The following information
on the project’s net increase
in vehicle trips
is therefore being provided
as a supplement to the VMT analysis for
informational purposes.

Applied Trip Generation Rates and Land Uses

The anticipated trip generation for the proposed project was estimated using standard rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in
Trip Generation Manual
, 11
th

Edition, 2021
.

Rates
for
the
“
Hotel
” (ITE
LU #
310
)
, “Timeshare” (ITE LU #265), and “Strip Retail Plaza <40k” (ITE LU #822) land uses were applied .

Trip
generation rates for the “Department Store” land use (ITE LU#875) were applied to estimate the trips previously
associated with the Kohl’s use that
has recently closed and wil
l
be demolished
.

The use of “Timeshare” trip
generation rates for the branded residential uses was deemed appropriate since such rates account for the typical travel characteristics of both owners and short
-
term users of these units; the timeshare trip rates are also cons
ervative in that they have a slightly higher per
-
unit trip generation than both mid
-
rise residential and hotel
uses.

Based on the project description, approximately half of the project’s 30,000 square feet of retail/service uses would be ancillary to the hotel. The ITE land use description for hotels states, “ A hotel is a place of lodging that provides
sleeping accommodations and supporting facilities such as restaurants, cocktail lounges, meeting and banquet rooms or convention facilities, limited recreational facilities (pool, fitness room), and/or other reta il and service shops.
” The
trips associated with these functio
ns are therefore already reflected in the hotel trip generation rates. Standard ITE rates for a small retail plaza were applied to the remaining 15,000 square feet of non -
hotel related retail/service
uses proposed by the project.

Internal Capture Trips

The
Trip Generation Manual

also includes data and methodologies that can be applied to determine the proportion of internal trips that may occur within a development area that includes a variety of land uses. Internal trips occur at mixed
-
use developments, and in the case of the
First Street Phase II project

would

primarily

consist of residents
and hotel guests
patronizing adjacent retail uses, as well as employees of nonresidential uses patronizing other nonresidential uses (such as
hotel
employees
patroni
zing

adjacent
service retail and
restaurant

uses
).

These trips
would be

made by walking

rather than driving
and would
therefore
not affect the adjacent street network.

Note
that the
data
used to estimate internally
-
captured trips included only the 15,000 square feet of non -
hotel related
retail/service uses to avoid double
-
counting.

Copies of the
worksheets

indicating the derivation of the internal
capture rates are enclosed.

Total Project Trip Generation

The expected trip generation potential for the proposed project is indicated in Table
2 , with deductions taken for
trips made to and from the
existing Kohl’s department store

and other retail/restaurant uses
at the site

as well as
for internal capture. The proposed project is expected to generate an average of 2,539

trips per day, including
138

trips during the a.m. peak hour and
205

during the p.m. peak hour.

A
fter deductions
for the removed Kohl’s
and
other uses
are taken into account, the project would be expected to generate 48 fewer

net

new trips on a daily
basis,
7 9

more trips
during the morning peak hour
,

and
17 more
tri
p
s

during the evening peak hour; these

trips
represent the
change

in traffic associated with the project
as
compared to
that

generated by

Kohl’s
and other uses
to be removed
.

ATTACHMENT 23
Mr
.

Jason Brandman

Page
6 May 1, 2025

Table
2 –

Trip Generation Summary

Land Use

Units

Daily

AM Peak Hour

PM Peak Hour

Rate

Trips

Rate

Trips

Out

Rate

Trips

Out

Existing to be Removed

Kohl’s

67.36 ksf

31.45 1

-
2,118

0.58 -
39 -
2 5

-
14 1.95

-
131

-
66 -
65 Retail/Restaurant

8.61 ksf

54.45 -
469

2.36 -
20 -
12 -
8 6.59

-
57 -
28 -
29 Existing Total Trips

-
2,587

-
5 9

-
37 -
22 -
188

-
94 -
94 Proposed

Hotel

16 1

rooms

7.99 1,2
86 0.46

7 4

4 1

33 0
.59

9 5

4 8

47 Branded
Residential

78 units

8.63 673

0.40 31

19 12

0.63 49

20 29

Retail
2 15 ksf

54.45 817

2.36 35

21 1
4 6.59

99 49

50 Internal Capture

8. 5
%
3 -
2 37

1.4 %

-
2 -
1 -
1 15.
6 %

-
38 -
19 -
19 Project Total

Trips

2,539

138

80 58

205

98 107

Net Change Trips

-
48 79

43 36

17 4

13 Note:

du = dwelling unit; ksf = 1,000 square feet;
1 daily rates for “Department Store” are unavailable so were estimated using

the same p.m. peak hour to daily ratios reflected in published trip generation rates for the “Apparel Store” land use;

2 reflects half of the project’s 30 ksf of retail/service uses (remainder is ancillary to the hotel and included in hotel trip

generation estimate);
3 daily internal capture estimated by applying the average of a.m. and p.m. peak hour internal

capture percentages

With respect to potential effects on downtown Napa traffic congestion, the project’s influences are likely to be modest.

The proposed project is expected to generate more traffic than existing uses during the a.m. peak hour, though downtown congestion is typically less of a concern in the mornings .

During the p.m. peak hour when
traffic in the area is typically most congested, t
he
project is
estimated
to result in a net increase of 17 trips
.

T
he

additional peak hour
trips would
disperse onto the downtown street grid and be expected to cause changes in intersection delay that are imperceptible to most drivers.

Trip Generation
W
ithin
the
Downtown Napa Specific Plan

Area

The Downtown Napa Specific Plan (DNSP) and associated DNSP EIR contemplated intensification of land uses in the downtown area consisting of both new development and redevelopment of existing uses.

Some d
evelopment
and redevelopment activity has take
n
place since 2012 when the DNSP was approved,
with additional
development

projects
entitled by the City of Napa
but not yet built.

To
understand how development in the DNSP
area has and is expected to track from a traffic perspective, including comparison to the

land use growth
increments analyzed

in the DNSP EIR, the trip generation associated with the following scenarios w
as estimated.

•

Added growth originally contemplated in the DNSP EIR

•

Growth associated with built and entitled projects since adoption of the DNSP EIR

•

Growth associated with built and entitled projects plus the proposed project

To
present a holistic trip generation comparison for these three scenarios focusing on land use growth increments within the DNSP, estimates were developed using four broad land use types as well as consistent assumptions pertaining to the percentage of inte
rnally
-
captured trips.

Note that for the proposed First Street Napa Phase II
project this approach leads to a less
-
detailed trip generation than that presented above in
Table 2
, but allows a
clearer apples
-
to
-
apples comparison when considering the differences among scenarios for the entire DNSP area.

ATTACHMENT 23
Mr
.

Jason Brandman

Page
7 May 1, 2025

The following land use categories and associated ITE trip generation rates from the 2021
Trip Generation Manual

were applied.

•

Residential
–
estimated using “Multifamily Housing (Mid
-
Rise) Not Close to Rail Transit”

(ITE LU#221) rates

•

Hotel
–
estimated using
“Hotel” (ITE LU #310)

rates

•

Office –
estimated using “General Office Building” (ITE LU #710) rates

•

Retail
–
estimated using “Strip Retail Plaza <40k” (ITE LU #822) rates

The DNSP EIR
applied deductions to the total trips estimated through application of standard ITE rates to account
for internally
-
captured trips as well as trips made by transit, walking, and bicycling. The deductions ranged from 26 to 31 percent depending on time period and scenario. For the purposes of this analysis ,
a uniform deduction
of 25 percent was
conservatively
applied to all scenarios.

A summary of the estimated added vehicular trips associated with each of the three DNSP land use growth scenarios is shown in

Table 3
.

A more detailed version of the table including applied trip generation rates is enclosed.

Table
3 –

Comparison of
Trip Generation
Within the Downtown Napa Specific Plan Area

Scenario

Land Use

Units

Weekday

Daily Trips

Weekday

AM Peak Hour Trips

Weekday

PM Peak Hour Trips

Added Growth Originally Contemplated in the DNSP EIR

Residential

627 units

2,847

232

245

Hotel

303 rooms

2,421

139

179

Office

470.6
0 ksf

5,101

715

678

Retail

108.59 ksf

5,913

256

716

Subtotal

16,282

1,342

1,818

Internal and Non
-
Auto Trips

-
4,071

-
336

-
454

Total

Trips

12,211

1,006

1,364

Growth Since Adoption of the DNSP EIR (Built plus
Entitled)

Residential

100 units

454

37 39

Hotel

501 rooms

4,003

230

296

Office

51.63 ksf

560

78 74

Retail

11.43 ksf

622

27 75

Subtotal

5,639

372

484

Internal and Non
-
Auto Trips

-
1,410

-
93 -
122

Total Trips

4,229

279

362

Percent of Total DNSP
Traffic Growth

35%

28%

27%

Growth Since Adoption of the DNSP (Built plus Entitled) plus Proposed Project

Residential

178 units

808

66 69

Hotel

662 rooms

5,289

305

391

Office

51.63 ksf

560

78 74

Retail

34.57 ksf

-
1,882

-
82 -
228

I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT 23
Mr
.

Jason Brandman

Page
8 May 1, 2025

Table
3 –

Comparison of
Trip Generation
Within the Downtown Napa Specific Plan Area

Scenario

Land Use

Units

Weekday

Daily Trips

Weekday

AM Peak Hour Trips

Weekday

PM Peak Hour Trips

Subtotal

4,775

367

306

Internal and Non
-
Auto Trips

-
1,194

-
9 2

-
77 Total Trips

3,581

275

229

Percent of Total DNSP Traffic Growth

29%

27%

17%

Note
s
:

ksf = 1,000 square feet
;

1 Proposed P
roject adds 30,000 s.f. of new retail and demolishes 76,000 s.f. of existing retail; the net
decrease

of 46,000 s.f., when combined with the 11,430 s.f. of retail growth since adoption of

the DNSP,
results in an overall
decrease

of 34,570 s.f. within the DNSP

Based on the applied trip generation estimates, built and entitled projects consume approximately 35 percent of the total anticipated
DNSP
growth in daily trips and 27 to 28 percent of the total anticipated DNSP
growth in peak
hour trips. With the proposed First Street Napa Phase II project, approximately
29 percent of the anticipated

DNSP

growth in daily trips and
17 to
27 percent of the anticipated
DNSP
growth in peak hour trips
is estimated to

be
consumed.

Note that
t
he

share of trips consumed by development in the
overall
DNSP
actually
decreases

with the
proposed project as compared to co
nditions wi
thout the project
; this is attributable to the
net decrease in retail
resulting from

the demolition of Kohl
’
s and
other retail

uses on the project site
3 .

Conclusions

•

The proposed project is expected to have a less
-
than
-
significant VMT impact.

•

The proposed project is expected to generate an average of 2,539 trips per day, including 138 trips during the a.m. peak hour and
205

during the p.m. peak hour. Compared to conditions
with

Kohl’s
and other
retail/restaurant uses to be removed, the project would be expected to generate 48 fewer

trips on a daily
basis,
79 more trips

during the morning peak hour
,
and
17 more

trip
s
during the evening peak hour.

•

The project’s influences on downtown Napa traffic congestion as compared to conditions when Kohl’s was open are likely to be modest; the relatively small incremental increase s in
peak hour trips
are

expected to
disperse onto the downtown street grid, causing negligible changes to delays.

•

Built and entitled projects are estimated to consume approximately 35 percent of the total growth in daily traffic associated with the land use changes envisioned by the DNSP.

•

With the proposed First Street Napa Phase II project, approximately 29 percent of the total anticipated DNSP
growth in daily trips is estimated to be consumed.

Th
e
decrease as compared to built and entitle
d projects
is

3 If
the
more detailed estima
tion of
net
change
s in
trip
s at the
First Street Napa Phase II

site

shown in Table 2
are

used to
represent

project

trips instead of the broad land use categories
and
associated trip generation rates
reflec
ted

in Table 3,
the percentages of DNSP trips consumed under
“
Built plus Entitled plus
Project
”
scenario
would be 34
%
of daily trips, 36% of a.m. peak hour trips, and 28% of p.m. peak hour trips.

ATTACHMENT 23
M
r
.

Jason Brandman

Page
9 May 1, 2025

attributable to the net decrease in retail square footage resulting f rom the project
’
s demolition of Kohl
’
s and

other retail uses on the project site.

Thank you for giving W
-
Trans the opportunity to provide these services. Please call if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Zachary Matley, AICP

Principal

JZM
/
NAP173
.L
1 Enclosure
s
:

Weighted VMT per Capita Exhibit
,
Internal Capture Worksheets
,
DNSP Trip Generation Information

ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23
First Street Napa Phase II Project
Mitigation M
onitoring and

Reporting Program

City of
Napa
,
Napa

County, California

PREPARED FOR:

City of Napa

Planning Division

1600 First Street

Napa, CA 94559

707.257.9530

Contact:

Ricky
Caperton, AICP

PREPARED BY:

FirstCarbon Solutions

2999 Oak Road, Suite 250

Walnut Creek, CA 94597

925.357.2562

Contact:

Mary Bean, Project Director

Angela Wolfe, Project Manager

June 18
,
2025

ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23
First Street Napa Phase II Project

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

FCS

1 H
ttps://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

PREFACE

Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 require a Lead Agency to adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) whenever it adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)

or
Environmental Impact Report (EIR)

in
conjunction with a project approval. The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure that
compliance with the
mitigation measures occurs during project implementation.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., an EIR was certified and a MMRP was adopted by the City of
Napa

(City) on May 1, 2012
(
Downtown Napa Specific Plan
Environmental Impact Report [DNSP EIR], State Clearinghouse [SCH] No. 20 10042043
).

The
Initial Study/Addendum to the DNSP EIR (Initial Study/Addendum)

prepared for the
proposed
First Street Napa Phase II Project

(proposed
P
roject)

concluded that project implementation would be
consistent with the development evaluated in the EIR and further identified relevant mitigation measures required by the EIR that are applicable to the project. This project -
specific MMRP
documents how and when the relevant mitigation measures adopted by the Lead Agency as part of the MMRP for the EIR, as well as ce
rtain
P
roject
-
specific refinements to related aspects of
implementation for mitigation measures related to cultural resources and Tribal cultural resources , will
be implemented for the proposed
P
roject and ensures that potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
P
roject are consistent with the impact conclusions set forth in the EIR as identified and explained more fully in the

Initial

Study/Addendum
.

This document does not discuss those subjects that the environmental analysis demonstrates would result in less than significant impacts and for which no mitigation was proposed or necessary.

ATTACHMENT 23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

3 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Table
1 :

First Street Napa Phase II

Project

Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

4.3 Air Quality

MM 4.B
-
1 :

In order to be consistent with the MSM A
-
1 and MSM
A
-
2 T
ransportation
C
ontrol
M
easures

(TCMs), the City shall
require that the following measures be included as potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies to be implemented by individual project applicants, where feasible and appropriate:

•

Install charging units for electric vehicles at residences and businesses.

•

Develop incentives for businesses to include preferential parking for electric and/or hybrid vehicles. (As required by the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code, Chapter 5, Section 5.106.5.2).

Submittal
and approval
of
TDM

Plan

Incorporation of TDM
strategies into project
construction documents

During permit
processing

City of Napa

Public
Works Traffic
Engineer; Economic
Development,
Building Official

MM 4.B
-
2 :

The City shall ensure that the Specific Plan design
guidelines and development standards incorporate the following measures to reduce or avoid exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs:

For construction activities, measures may include, but not limited to, the following:

•

Minimize idling time either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the time of idling to 5 minutes (as required by the State Airborne Toxics Control Measure [Title 13, Section 2485 of the California Code of Regulations]). Provide clear signa
ge that posts this requirement for workers at the
entrances to the site.

Incorporation into project
construction documents

Submittal of proof of
implementation during
construction

Prior to approval of
demolition or grading
permit

During construction

through to issuance
of occupancy permit

City of Napa

Community
Development
Department; Building
Official; Field
Inspector

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS

4 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

•
Use new diesel engines that are designed to minimize DPM emissions (usually through the use of catalyzed particulate filters in the exhaust) or retrofitting older engines with catalyzed particulate filters which would reduce up to 85 percent of DPM emissio
ns.

F
or operational activities, in order to comply with the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective
(ARB 2005) and achieve an acceptable interior air quality level for sensitive receptors, appropriate measures, shall be incorporated into residential building design. For projects to be developed under the Specific Plan that include residential receptors within 1,000 feet of a sour
ce of TACs (stationary or
CNR railroad), the appropriate measures shall include one of the following methods:

1. The project applicant shall retain a qualified air quality consultant to prepare a Health Risk Assessment (HRA) in accordance with the ARB and the Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment requirements to determine
the exposure of project resid
ents to TACs prior to issuance of
a demolition, grading, or building permit. The HRA shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval.

The applicant shall implement the approved HRA
recommendations, if any. If the HRA concludes that th
e air
quality risks from nearby sources are at or below acceptable levels, then additional measures are not required.

2. The project applicant shall implement the following features that have been found to reduce the air quality risk to sensitive receptors and shall be included in the project construction ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

5 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

plans. These shall be submitted to the Planning Division and the Building Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of a demolition, grading, or building permit and ongoing.

Do not locate sensitive receptors near distribution center’s entry and exit points.
b.

Do not locate sensitive receptors in the same building as a perchloroethylene dry cleaning facility.
c.

Maintain a 50’ buffer from a typical gas dispensing facility (under 3.6 million gallons of gas per year).
d.

Install, operate and maintain in good working order a
central heating and ventilation (HV) system or other air take system in the building, or in each individual residential unit that meets the efficiency standard of the MERV 13. The HV system shall inclu
de the following features: Installation of a
high efficiency filter and/or carbon filter to filter particulates and other chemical matter from entering the building. Either HEPA filters or ASHRAE 85 percent supply filters shall be used.
e.

Retain a qualified HV consultant or HERS rater during the design phase of the project to locate the HV system based on exposure modeling from the mobile and/or stationary
pollutant sources.
f.

Maintain positive pressure within the building.
g.

Achieve a performance standard of at least one air
exchange per hour of fresh outside filtered air.
h.

Achieve a performance standard of at least four air
exchanges per hour of recirculation.

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS

6 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

Achieve a performance standard of 0.25 air exchanges per hour of in unfiltered infiltration if the building is not positively pressurized.
j.

Project applicant shall maintain, repair and/or replace HV system or prepare an Operation and Maintenance Manual
for the HV system and the filter. The manual shall include the operating instructions and maintenance and
replacement schedule. This manual sh
all be included in the
CC&R’s for residential projects and distributed to the
building maintenance staff. In addition, the applicant shall prepare a separate Homeowners Manual. The manual shall
contain the operating instructions and maintenance and
repla
cement schedule for the HV system and the filters. It
shall also include a disclosure to the buyers of the air quality analysis findings.

MM 4.B
-
4 :

Implement Mitigation Measure 4.B
-
1 to ensure
consistency with the BAAQMD TCMs to promote clean, fuel efficient and zero
-
emission vehicles
.

See MM 4.B
-
1 See MM 4.B
-
1 See MM 4.B
-
1 4
.
4 Biological Resources

MM 4.C
-
1a
:

The City shall ensure that the project
-
specific and
Specific Plan design guidelines and development standards incorporate the following measures to reduce or avoid impacts to fish species:

•
Avoid, reduce, or compensate for indirect impacts to fish species; for example, removal of riparian vegetation would require compensatory shade plantings.

Incorporation into project
construction documents
.

Prior to
construction
permits.

City of Napa
Community
Development
Department

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

7 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

•

Design creek and river crossings so as to maintain
connectivity and allow for unimpeded flow of water, and if at all possible avoid building piers or footings within the channel.

MM 4.C
-
1b
:

Pre
-
Construction Special
-
Status Avian Surveys. No
more than two weeks in advance of any tree or
shrub pruning,
removal, or ground
-
disturbing activity that will commence during
the breeding season (February 1 through August 31), a qualified wildlife biologist will conduct pre
-
construction surveys of all
potential special
-
status bird nesting habitat in

the vicinity of the
planned activity. Pre
-
construction surveys are not required for
construction activities scheduled to occur during the
nonbreeding season (August 31 through January 31).

Construction activities commencing during the nonbreeding season a
nd continuing into the breeding season do not require
surveys (as it is assumed that any breeding birds taking up nests would be acclimated to project
-
related activities already
under way). Nests initiated during construction activities would be presumed t
o be unaffected by the activity, and a buffer zone
around such nests would not be necessary. However, a nest initiated during construction cannot be moved or altered.

If pre
-
construction surveys indicate that no nests of special
-
status birds are present or that nests are inactive or potential habitat is unoccupied:

no further mitigation is required.

If active nests of special
-
status birds are found during the
surveys: implement Mitigation Measure 4.C
-
1c
.

Qualified Biologist’s pe
-
construction survey and
submittal of survey
documents

No more than 14
days before start or
restart of construction
during the months of
February to
August.

City of Napa

Community
Development
Department
; Qualified
Biologist

MM 4.C
-
1c
:

Avoidance of active nests. If active nests of special
-
status birds or other birds are found during surveys, the results of the surveys would be discussed with the California
Consultation with
California Department of
Fish and
Wildlife (CDFW)

P
rior to construction
permits

CDFW
; City of Napa

Community

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS

8 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

Department of Fish and Game and avoidance procedures will be adopted, if necessary, on a case
-
by
-
case basis. In the event
that a special
-
status bird or protected nest is found, construction
would be stopped until either the bird leaves the area or avoidanc
e measures are adopted. Avoidance measures can
include construction buffer areas (up to several hundred feet in the case of raptors), relocation of birds, or seasonal avoidance.

If buffers are created, a no disturbance zone will be created around active nests during the breeding season or until a qualified biologist determines that all young have fledged. The size of the buffer zones and types of construction activities restricted will take into account factors such as the following:

1. Noise and human disturbance levels at the Plan area and the nesting site at the time of the survey and the noise and disturbance expected during the construction activity;

2. Distance and amount of vegetation or other screening between the Plan area and the nest; and sensitivity of
individual nesting species and behaviors of the nesting birds. and incorporation of
avoidance measures

into
construction documents.

Development
Department

4 .
5 Cultural and Tribal
Cultural Resources

MM 4.D
-
1 :

The City shall require that any future development
under the Specific Plan meets the intent and goals of the City of Napa Downtown Historic Design Guidelines. This includes any project that would alter historic resources or would be constructed adjacent to a historic resource

Ensure compliance of
project application with
City of Napa Downtown
Historic Design Guidelines

Prior to
project
approval

City of Napa
Community
Development
Department

MM 4.D
-
2a
:

When specific projects are proposed under the
Specific Plan that involves ground
-
disturbing activity into native
soils, the City's "PastFinder" archaeological database shall be consulted. Recommendations provided by the "PastFinder" database shall be imple
mented based on a parcel’s
Submittal
and approval
of
site
-
specific cultural
resources study

Prior to
project
approval

City of Napa

Community
Development
Department
; Qualified
ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

9 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

archaeological sensitivity. In those cases where a site -
specific
cultural resources study is necessary, it shall be performed by qualified cultural resources professional. The study will include an updated records search, pedestrian survey of the project a
rea, development of a historic context, sensitivity assessment for buried prehistoric and historic
-
period deposits, and
preparation of a technical report that meets federal and State requirements. If significant resources are identified and cannot be avoid
ed, treatment plans will be developed in consultation
with the City and Native American representatives to mitigate potential impacts to less than significant.

cultural resources
professional

MM 4.D
-
2b
:

Should any archaeological artifacts be found during
construction in the Planning Area, all construction activities within 50 feet shall immediately halt and the City must be notified. A qualified archaeologist shall inspect the findings within 24 hours of
the discovery. If the site is determined to
contain significant cultural resources, funding will be provided to identify, record, report, evaluate, and recover the resources as necessary. Construction within the area of the find shall not recomm
ence until impacts on the historical or unique
archaeological resource are mitigated. Additionally, Public Resources Code Section 5097.993 stipulates that a project sponsor must inform project personnel that collection of any Native American artifact is pr
ohibited by law.

Submittal and approval of
documentation that
construction personnel
have been trained
regarding the illegality of
collecting Tribal artifacts

If archaeological artifacts
are found, project
applicant and its
contractor(s) will halt all
construction activities
within 50 feet and notify
the City. Qualified
archaeologist will inspect
the findings within 24
hours of the discovery.

Identify record, re
port,
evaluate, and recover the
Prior to demolition or
grading permit
(whichever occurs
first)

O
ngoing
during
demo
li
tion, grading,
and construction.

City of Napa

Community
Development
Department
; building
official; building plan
checker
; Qualified
archaeologist

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS

10 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

resources as necessary.

Upon full mitigation City
will give approval for
recommencement of
construction within the
area.

MM 4.D
-
4 :

The treatment of any human remains and associated
or unassociated funerary objects discovered during soil -
disturbing activities shall comply with applicable State laws.

Such treatment would include immediate notification of the Napa County Coroner. In the
event of the coroner’s determination that
the human remains are Native American, the coroner shall notify of the Native American Heritage Commission, which would appoint a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) (PRC § 5097.98). The archaeological consultant, the Eve
nt Authority, and MLD shall
make all reasonable efforts to develop an agreement for the treatment, with appropriate dignity, of any human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5[d]). The agreement would take into consideration the appropriate excavation, removal, recordation, analysis, custodianship, curation, and final disposition of the human remains and associated or unassociated funerary objects. The PRC allows 48 hours to reach agreement on these matters. If t
he MLD and the other parties could not agree on the reburial method, the Event Authority shall follow Section 5097.98(b) of the PRC, which states that “the landowner or his or her authorized representative shall reinter the human remains and items associated with Native American burials with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further subsurface disturbance.”
Upon

discovery of human
remains and associated or
unassociated funerary
objects, the project
applicant will immediately
notify Napa County
Coroner and City of Napa
project planner. After such
notification, the
archaeological consultant,
project applicant, Nati
ve
Heritage Commission, and
Most Likely Descendant
(MlD) will develop an
agreement in accordance
with the specifications of
this measure and state
law.

If the MLD and the other
parties could not, applicant
will reinter the human
remains in accordance
with the specifications of
Ongoing during
grading and
construction

In the event of an
accidental discovery
or recognition of any
human remains
during ground
-
City of Napa
Community
Development
Department; field
inspector

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

11 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

this measure and state
law.

The project applicant will
incorporate the
specifications of this
measure into project
specifications and grading
and construction plans.

disturbing activities

Prior to ground
-
disturbing activities

Project
-
Specific
IM CUL
-
1 :

Archaeological Monitoring
.

A
qualified Archaeological Monitor reporting to the qualified Project Archaeologist shall be
present during all initial Project
-
related ground disturbance, which includes but is not limited to, clearing, grubbing, trenching, and grading to check for the inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains.

Qualified Archaeologist’s
on
-
site monitoring

During
initial ground
disturbance

Qualified
Archaeologist; City of
Napa Community
Development
Department

4.7 Geology and Soils

MM 4.D
-
3 :

Prior to the start of any subsurface excavations that
would extend beyond previously disturbed soils, all construction forepersons and field supervisors shall receive training by a qualified professional Paleontologist, as defined by the Society of Vertebr
ate Paleontology (SVP), who is experienced in
teaching non
-
specialists, to ensure they can recognize fossil
materials and will follow proper notification procedures in the event any are uncovered during construction. Procedures to be conveyed to workers in
clude halting construction within 50 feet
of any potential fossil find and notifying a qualified
Paleontologist, who will evaluate its significance. Training on Submittal and approval of
p
roject sponsor’s
documentation of trainings
of forepersons, field
supervisors and all
construction workers.

Submittal and approval of
paleontologist’s excavation
and salvage plan

Prior to demolition or
grading permit
(whichever occurs
first)

P
rior to the start of
any subsurface
excavations

City of Napa
Community
Development
Department; building
official

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FCS

12 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

paleontological resources will also be provided to all other construction workers but may involve using a videotape of the initial training and/or written materials rather than in -
person
training by a Paleontologist. If a fossil is determined to be signifi
cant and avoidance is not feasible, the Paleontologist will develop and implement an excavation and salvage plan in accordance with SVP standards
.

4. 8

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MM 4.B
-
5:

The City shall ensure that applicant(s) for individual
projects to be developed under the Specific Plan would
incorporate Green Building and Development Measures as
listed in Appendix C (AIR
-
2). Each increment of new
development under the Specific Plan re
quiring a discretionary
approval from the City (e.g., proposed tentative subdivision map, conditional use permit), would demonstrate that GHG emissions from operation would be reduced by 30 percent from business
-
as
-
usual 2020 emissions levels, in order to
achieve
1990 levels by 2020.

Incorporate Green Building
and Development
Measures into project
design and demonstrate
GHG emissions from
operations would adhere to
reduction goals set by the
City.

During

permit

processing

City of Napa
Community
Development
Department; building
plan checker

MM 4.B
-
6:

Implement Mitigation Measure 4.B
-
5 to reduce
GHGs.

See MM 4.B
-
5 See MM 4.B
-
5 See MM 4.B
-
5 4.13

Noise

MM 4.I
-
1a
:

Construction contractors for subsequent
development projects within the Planning Area shall utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment redesign, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acousticall
y-
attenuating shields or shrouds,
etc.) when within 400 feet of sensitive receptor locations.

Review and approve
project specifications and
grading and construction
plans for inclusion of
specifications in this
measure.

Prior to issuance of
building and grading
permit(s).

City of Napa
Community
Development
Department;

building
official
;
field inspecto
r
ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

13 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

Additional techniques shall include, but not be limited to the following noise control elements:

•

Nonresidential construction project activities (Monday through Friday) shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. with no startup of machines or equipment prior to 8 a.m. No delivery of materials nor equipment shall occur prior to 7:30 a.m. or

after 5:00 p.m. No cleaning of machines or equipment
shall occur after 6:00 p.m. No servicing of equipment shall occur past 6:45 p.m. Construction of weekends and holidays shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., unless a permit allows oth
erwise.

•

Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for construction shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible to avoid noise
associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. However, wh
ere use of pneumatic tools is
unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air
exhaust shall be used; this muffler shall achieve lower noise levels from the exhaust by approximately 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used where
feasible
in order to achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. Quieter procedures shall be used, such as drills rather than impact equipment, whenever feasible.

•

All construction equipment shall not be placed adjacent to developed areas unless said equipment is provided with
acoustical shielding.

•

Signs shall be posted at all construction site entrances to the property upon commencement of project construction, for the purposes of informing all contractors and subcontractors, their employees, agents, materialmen, and all other persons at the Inspect site during
construction to ensure
compliance with project
specifications and grading
and construction plans.

Field inspections
during construction.

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

14 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

construction site, of the basic requirements of Mitigation Measures 4.1
-
a through 4.1
-
c

MM 4.I
-
1b
:

Should pile
driving be necessary for a proposed
project, the project sponsor would require that the construction contractor limit pile driving activity to the least disturbing hours of the day. To further mitigate pile driving and/or other extreme noise
-
generating con
struction impacts, a set of site
-
specific
noise attenuation measures shall be completed under the supervision of a qualified acoustical consultant. No extreme noise
-
generating activities shall be allowed on weekends and
holidays. Techniques included may in
clude but not be limited to
the following:

•

Erect temporary plywood noise barriers around the
construction site,

•

Implement “quiet” pile driving technology (such as pre
-
drilling
of piles and the use of more than one pile driver to shorten the total pile driving duration), where feasible, in consideration of geotechnical and structural requirements and conditions;

•

Use noise control blankets on building structures as buildings are erected to reduce noise emission from the site; Evaluate the feasibility of noise control at the receivers by temporarily improving the noise reduction capability of adjacent buildings; and

•

Monitor the effectiveness of noise attenuation measures by taking noise measurements.

Review and approve
project specifications and
grading and construction
plans for inclusion of
specifications in this
measure.

Inspect site during
construction to ensure
compliance with project
specifications and grading
and construction plans.

Prior to issuance of
building and grading
permit(s).

Field inspections
during construction.

City of Napa
Community
Development
Department;

building
official
;

field inspecto
r

MM 4.I
-
1c
:

The City shall condition approval of projects in the
Planning Area near receptors sensitive to construction noise, such as residences and schools, such that, in the event of a justified complaint regarding construction noise, the City would Review all noise
complaints received;
assess whether noise
complaints are justified;
At approval of project
specifications,
grading permits and
building permits

Community
Development
Department; code
enforcement officer.

ATTACHMENT 23

FIRST STREET NAPA PHASE II PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

REPORTING PROGRAM

FCS

15 https://adecinnovations.sharepoint.com/sites/PublicationsSite/Shared Documents/Publications/Client (PN -
JN)/6145/61450001/MMRP/61450001 First Street Napa Phase II Project MMRP (1).docx

Mitigation
Measures

Method of Verification

Timing of
Verification

Responsible for
Verification

Verification of Completion

Date

Initial

have the ability to require changes in the construction practices to address the noise complaints.

alert Project Sponsor of
revised construction
practices.

Project applicant will
post
the City’s noise complaint
procedure in publicly
accessible locations at
each construction site.

Inspect site during
construction to ensure
compliance with revised
construction practices

O
ngoing during
demolition, grading,
construction

ATTACHMENT 23

Napa City CouncilJune 24, 2025

Napa City Council
June 24, 2025